HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08151989 - T.9 MR T. 9 MR
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DATE: August 15, 1989
MATTER OF RECORD
-------------------------------------------=-------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Proposed 1989 Revision to the County Solid Waste Management
Plan
This being the time fixed for hearing on the proposed 1989
Revision to the County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Harvey Bragdon, Director of Community Development Department,
explained the procedures before the Board this date.
David Okita of the Community Development Department Environmental
Division described the proposed Plan. He noted that the Plan also
contains landfill sites and reserve sites to be included in the
General Plan Amendment. He advised that the Plan was reviewed by the
Solid Waste Commission and that Commission recommends that the Board
approve the Plan.
The Chair declared the hearing open. The following persons
appeared and commented:
Jim Hulsoff , Vice Chair of the Solid Waste Commission
Brian Kruse, Brentwood
Don Seferovich, 16800 Marsh Creek Road, Clayton, speaking for the
Marsh Creek Association
Barbara Price, Council member of the City of Antioch
Linda Callon, of Berliner, Cohen, & Biagini, Ten Almaden
Boulevard, San Jose, representing the City of Antioch, East Bay
Regional Park District and the Contra Costa Water District
Thomas H. Lindenmeyer, 11500 Skyline Boulevard, Oakland,
representing the East Bay Regional Park District
Dennis Pisila, 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord, representing the
Contra Costa Water District
Fred Caploe, Attorney, 2530 Arnold Drive, Suite 360, Martinez ,
representing the City of Pittsburg, submitted two letters for the
record and indicated that he would make arrangements with County
Counsel to make reductions of the picture exhibits displayed in the
Board Room today part of the record. (No exhibits received by the
Clerk)
Dr. C. Michael Hogan, Earth Metrics Incorporated, 2855 Campus
Drive, Suite 300, San Mateo, representing the City of Pittsburg,
submitted a 4-page letter dated August 15, 1989.
Dr. Theodore V. Tronoff, Tronoff Engineers and Planners, 5850
.Shellmound Street, Emeryville, representing the City of Pittsburg,
submitted a copy of his August 15, 1989 letter to Attorney Fred Caploe
on the subject: "City of Pittsburg - Contra Costa County Solid Waste
Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, Response Document. "
Dan Parker, 6363 Christie, #1507, Emeryville, representing the
City of Pittsburg, submitted a pictorial report entitled: "Proposed
Keller Dump, Visual Impacts on the City of Pittsburg. "
Ron Currie, 4270 Diehl Way, Pittsburg, Councilman for the City of
Pittsburg
Robert Lewis, 50 Hawthorne Lane, Pittsburg, speaking for the
Pittsburg Community Advisory Commission
Harry Alker, 2010 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, speaking for the
Pittsburg Chamber of Commerce
Tom Bruen, representing the Keller Canyon Landfill Company
Dr. Jill Shapiro, leader of project engineers and design team for
Keller Canyon Landfill Company, showed slides of the proposed landfill
Tom Reilly, 950 Waterbird Way, Martinez, speaking for Acme Fill
Corporation
John Hawthorne, 2241 Westwood Lane, Pittsburg
Fred Caploe, Attorney for the City of Pittsburg, requested that
this hearing be continued to provide for the consultant the
opportunity to respond to new information provided today.
County Counsel clarified that most of Mr. Caploe' s comments are
to the General Plan, not the matter before the Board today.
No one else desired to speak.
Harvey Bragdon recommended that the hearing be closed and the
Board take action today.
Supervisor Torlakson advised that he supports the basic plan but
has trouble with most of the sites except for the Marsh Canyon site.
He commented that he believed that landfills must be kept away from
cities and homes, and that he would not be supporting the motion to
approve the staff ' s recommendation, because he could not support four
out of the five sites.
Supervisor McPeak advised that she would vote in support, but
that she was vehemently opposed to the Kirker Pass site.
Supervisor Fanden advised that although she did not favor all of
the sites, it is imperative that the Board proceed and go forward in
moving the CoSWMP along to the Cities for approval.
The Board thereupon adopted Resolution No. 89/544 .