Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09271988 - 2.5 File: PD250-89U5/B.4 ?'� = ► BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: BARTON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES v('�wtra Costa��I It DATE: September 27, 1988 COU* SUBJECT: TEI4PORARY LITIGANT AND SPECTATOR SEATING AREA AT A.F. BRAY COURTS BUILDING; AUTHORIZATION NO. WPE637 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECONKENDATION FIND that an emergency exists and AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to proceed in the most expeditious manner, pursuant to Section 20134 of the Public Contract Code, to construct a temporary seating area for approximately 100 people on the third floor of the A.F. Bray Courts Building, 1020 Ward Street, Martinez, as required to permit litigants > and spectators to view the Sun Valley mall plane crash trial- via rial via remote video, and DECLARE that the project, as an emergency, is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The County will submit bills for all costs associated with this project to the State Administrative Office of the Courts for reimbursement pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure Section 404. 8. III. BACKGROUND: A. The State Judicial Council has coordinated all causes of action involving the Sun Valley Mall plane crash and has assigned Contra Costa County to try the case. The trial is scheduled to start on November 1, 1988 on the second floor of the new A.F. Bray Courts Building in Martinez. B. There are over 100 parties to the case, from different court jurisdictions. The litigants have a right to view the trial proceedings. The County, however, does not have a courtroom large enough to accommodate such a large number of litigants and spectators. Consequently, the Superior Court Administrator has requested that part of the unfinished space on the third floor of the A.F. Bray Courts Building be improved for temporary use by approximately 100 litigants and spectators, who will view the trial by remote video. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE; � u. RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S : ACTION OF BOARD ON SEP 27 h APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES' NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERV I SORSry ON THE(�DpAOTE SHOWN. cc: County Administrator ATTESTED SEP 2 ( 988 County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Court Administrator Jury Commissioner SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR General Services Department Architectural Division BY �h�y-�JLeF ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 Page 1 of 2 e C. The unfinished space on the third floor was designed to be completed for two courtrooms in the future when needed, when funds are available, and when parking is available to satisfy the demand created by the additional courtrooms. The improvements for the temporary use, where practical, will be permanent and will be usable when the additional courtrooms are completed in the future. D. The improvements must be completed by November 1, 1988 so that the space is available when the trial starts. If the improvements are not available by that date, the County will not be able to obtain reimbursement from the State Administrative Office of the Courts. E. The normal design, bid, construction process for this work is estimated to require four to six months. It is possible °to bypass the normal procedures for bidding the project and accomplish the project by the November 1, 1988 deadline through the provisions of Section 20134 of the Public Contract Code when the appropriate findings of an emergency are made by the Board. F. Since one of the bases of emergency defined in Section 20134 is . . . "when repair or replacements are necessary to permit the continued conduct of County operations or services" . . . ; since the County must provide for the litigants in the case by November 1, 1988; and since this cannot be done through the normal procurement process, it is appropriate to find that an emergency exists so that the County can continue to conduct its service to the Court. 25005B09.14B RDH:pg Page 2 of 2