Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09201988 - 1.42 TO: BIONR'U. OF SUPERVISORS Contra } FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon `- ra Director, Community Development Dept. C�o^sta DATE: September 20, 1988 County SUBJECT: Oakley Travel Demand/Traffic Engineering Model SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Amend contract with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. to incorporate revised scope of services for the Oakley Travel Demand/Traffic Engineering. Model . FINANCIAL IMPACT: The cost of the revised scope of services is $6,000 below the current authorization limit of $70,000. This work is funded by the Oakley Area of Benefit. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND: On February 23, 1988, the Board of Supervisors approved a contract with Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. , to develop the Oakley Travel Demand/Traffic Engineering Model . Changes are proposed to this contract which include: 1. deleting Phase I of the contract providing a regional impact analysis, and incorporating the work products into an optional traffic study task; 2. revising computer hardware requirements; 3. funding the collection of traffic counts; and 4. revising the contract's payment provisions to recognize the new work products and schedule. All revisions have been incorporated into a new work scope (see Exhibit A) to replace the original work scope. Orig. Dept. - CDD/TPD dpl4:bo0akMod.t08 X CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT; YES SIGNAT RE; RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR REC DATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE_ APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARV ON REP 2 1989 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED � OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT" COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS pONc�THE DATE SHOWN. cc: ATTESTED S E P 2 O 1985___ Public Works Dept. Asc Barton AscPHIL BATCHELOR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF hman Assoc. (via CDD) SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATORCommunity Development Auditor Co . Adm. BY ( ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 r REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND (cnt'd) The cost of the optional traffic study is not included in the contract revision. This optional task, if initiated, would be financed by developers and would require a separate action by the Board of Supervisors to increase the contract's authorization limit before work could proceed. The recommended action is needed to- comply -with the Oakley General Plan lawsuit settlement. The above recommendation will also maintain consistency with the work underway with the General Plan Review.