HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09131988 - 1.87 TO_ - .ABOARD OF SUPERVISORS File: 250-8741/A. 1�. 1
FROM: ' BARTON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES C=tra
CWLQ
DATE'. September 13 , 1988 (JO " "1
SUBJECT: APPROVING CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL
SERVICES FOR CENTRAL COUNTY CORPORATION YARD FOR PUBLIC WORKS
MARTINEZ (WH181B)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION
A. APPROVE a consulting services agreement with Interactive
Resources, 117 Park Place, Point. Richmond, for
architectural services for Central County Corporation
Yard for Public Works, Martinez.
B. AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to execute the
agreement, which will be effective August 22, 1988, and
will provide for architectural services through the
Design Development Phase, with a payment limit for basic
services of $67,200. 00., which- amount shall not be
exceeded without prior, written authorization by the
Director of General Services. -In addition, the agreement
will provide the Board an option to extend the
architectural services beyond the Design Development
Phase.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Funds in the capital account established for the project are
sufficient to cover the amount encumbered by this agreement.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND
A. On April 19, 1985, a master plan for Central County
Corporation Yard was completed by Interactive Resources.
A revised predesign program for Central County
Corporation Yard for Public Works was completed in August
1987 by Interactive :Resources Inc. to reflect changes
when the County established a General Services Department
separate from Public Works. The revised program has been
approved by the Public Works Department and the County
Administrator and they have recommended that design for
the project should proceed.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE S :
ACTION OF BOARD ON SFP 13 1988 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _X- OTHER _
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF.AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: Administrators Office ATTESTED SEP 13 1988
General Services Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Architectural SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Accounting
County Counsel ,
M382/7-83 Architect (Via AD)
BY ,DEPUTY
Page 1 of 2
vry
III. REASONS FOR RECOMEENDATIONS/BACKGROUND (continued)
B. Negotiations have been completed and an appropriate
agreement for architectural services is ready to sign.
The agreement describes full services, including
Schematic Design, :Design Development, Construction
Document, and Bidding and Construction phases of service.
C. While the agreement describes terms for 'full services, it
includes provisions which limit services to Schematic
Design and Design Development Phases, with an option to
extend the services to subsequent phases under the terms
described, after completion of the Design Development
Phase. This limitation is used to accommodate the
County' s expected cash flow conditions.
D. The project for the Central County Corporation Yard for
Public Works is necessary to accommodate the Lafayette
Corporation Yard whose lease is on month to month in 1988
and to relocate the outdated Shell Corporation Yard site.
E. The County must proceed with this agreement for
architectural services because it does not have
sufficient staff to provide the services.
F. Interactive Resourcesr Inc. has 30o minority and 340
female staff and 210 of the professionals employed by the
firm are minorities and 290 of the professional are
female.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
If this recommendation is not approved, the County will risk
not having a permanent site to relocate the Lafayette
Corporation Yard.
25041B08.24A
BB:dt
Page 2 of 2