Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07191988 - 1.25 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ��} FROiA Phil Batchelor �,,..,,��"},,,a County Administrator CJll.7lCl DATE: July 11, 198$ C"r"' "1 SUBJECT: Legislation:. Assembly Bill 3961 (Baker, Bates and Ferguson) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKZaROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Remove opposition to AB .3961 which originally exempted religious organizations operating child care facilities from the educational requirements for staff which are imposed on all other child care facilities. The bill has now been amended and no longer includes this provision. BACKGROUND: Assemblyman Ferguson had originally introduced AB 3961 to exempt religious organizations from the educational requirements that apply to staff in all other child care facilities. On June 28, 1988 , the Board voted to oppose AB 3961 because of this provision. AB 3961 has now been amended to add Assemblymen Baker and Bates as coauthors of the bill. As amended June 29, 1988, AB 3961 now does the following: 1. Repeals the existing Phillips/Reeves In-Home Child Protection Act of 1987 under which parents in this County and four other counties could, for a fee, request a criminal records check by the State and Federal governments of a child care provider or prospective . provider, with the provider' s written permission. 2. Reenacts similar provisions. Under the amended law it would be the responsibility of a child care provider to submit his or her fingerprints to the State and pay a fee. The Department of Justice, would run the fingerprints through both State and Federal law enforcement files. If there is no record that would disqualify the provider from being licensed, the Department of Justice would so code the Automated Child ' Abuse System. Thereafter, a parent, employment agency, or child care referral group could, for fee, submit a provider ' s driver' s license number to see whether they .11 CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE: / X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER S I GNATURE S /( ACTION OF BOARD ON July 19, 1988 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPEIW 1 SORS i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT; ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: Listed on Page 2 ATTESTED JUL 19 1988. PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M382/7-83 BY ,DEPUTY Page 2 have been coded into the Automated Child Abuse System as having no criminal conviction. If a provider ' s fingerprint clearance comes back indicating a criminal conviction which would preclude the provider from being . licensed, the Department of Justice would also notify the provider: If the fingerprint clearance indicates a conviction which could be waived for licensing purposes, the;; Department of Justice may either code the provider into the Automated Child 'Abuse System or refuse to do so, in which case the provider could appeal this decision. 3 . The Department of Justice would be required to keep the Automated Child Abuse System up-to-date with subsequent criminal history information and would be required to notify any parent, employment agency, or child care referral group of any subsequent criminal conviction. 4. The Department of Justice would also be required to establish an advisory committee consisting of a representative from the child care resource and referral agency in each county and one parent from each county. The advisory committee is charged with developing criteria on which to evaluate this project and recommending . them to the Department of Justice within six months of the effective date of the legislation. 5 . The Department of Justice is required to contract with an individual or firm to evaluate the project and report to the Legislature by August 1, 1990. The bill includes tests for determining whether the project is successful. 6 . The legislation applies only to San Francisco, Alameda, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, and San Diego counties. 7. The bill provides that its provisions are inoperative on June 30, 1991 and are repealed on January 1, 1992 . 8. The bill contains an urgency clause and would become effective upon approval by the Governor. In view of the substantial amendments made to the bill and the fact that it is co-authored by two members of this County's delegation and includes this County in the pilot. program, it is appropriate for the Board to withdraw its opposition. cc: County Administrator Social Services Director Sheriff-Coroner Catherine Ertz-Berger, Child Care Council Teri Dean, Child Care Council Assemblymen Tom Bates, William Baker, Gil Ferguson Ralph Heim, Jackson/Barish & Associates