HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08181987 - 1.3 -57
. i
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J . MICHAEL WALFORD , PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: August 18 , 1987
SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications for Highway 4
Widening at Gehringer School ,
Project No . 4580-6X4011-86 , Oakley Area .
Specific Request ( s ) or Recommendation ( s ) & Background &
Justification
I . RECOMMENDED ACTION :
APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Highway 4 Widening
at Gehringer School Project and ADVERTISE for bids to be received
on Thursday, September 17 , 1987 at 2 :00 p .m.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to p u b I i sh the Notice to
Contractors in accordance with Section 20392 of the Public
Contract Code , and
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of
Determination with the County Clerk .
II . FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated contract cost of the project is $132 ,500 . It is to
be funded by Oakley Area of Benefit .
III . REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors
the Plans and Specifications for the Highway 4 Widening at
Gehringer School Project .
The general prevailing rates of wages , which shall be the minimum
rates paid on this project , have been filed with the Clerk of
the Board and copies will be made available to any interested
party upon request .
Continued on attachment: X yes Signature:
Recommendation of County Administrator
Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other:
Signature( s) :
Action of Board on : AUG 18 1987
Approved as Recommended_ Other
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS
A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
Unanimous (Absent ) ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON
Ayes : Noes : THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
Absent: Abstain : SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Attested AUG 18 1987
Orig. Div. : PW (Design ) Phil Batchelor,
cc : County Administrator Clerk of the Board
Auditor- Controller of Supervisors and
PW Accounting County Administrator
Construction
Community Development
Attn : Gus Almquist ,
JDC/bb By
bo : 18 . t8 Deputy Clerk
� y r
The project has been determined to be in compliance with the
General Plan . A negative declaration of environmental
significance pertaining to this project was published with no
protest , and the Board has considered the negative declaration
together with all comments received during the public review
process . The Board hereby FINDS , on the basis of the initial
study and all comments received , that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment , and APPROVES the negative declaration .