HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07071987 - IO.2 � a
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: Internal Operations Committee Contra
June 22, 1987 @ . Costa
DATE: County
SUBJECT: EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES OF B E & K
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(_S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Request the Director of Personnel to continue to refine the data
provided by B E & K and provide our Committee on August 24, 1987 with
a more complete analysis of the data including a comparison of com-
bined employer cost of salary and benefits taking into account the
fact that B E & K does not provide vacation, sick leave or pension
benefits to employees and the additional cost to the employee from the
fact that dependent' s health coverage is not paid by the employer.
2) Request the Director of Personnel to obtain salary and benefits for
nonunion employers in the county and compare those figures with
comparable data from B E & K and present our committee with the
results of his comparison on August 24, 1987.
3 ) Request County Counsel to describe how the Board of Supervisors can
give some preference to the use of American-made products in construc-
tion done for the County. If changes in statutes are required ask
County Counsel to outline in general terms what changes would be
required and report to our Committee on August 24, 1987.
BACKGROUND:
On - April 21, 1987 the Board, upon the recommendation of our Committee,
authorized us to continue to gather information regarding the employment
practices of B E & K, general contractor for the USS-POSCO modernization
project in Pittsburg.
On June 22, 1987 our Committee met with representatives from Congressman
Miller ' s office, Senator Boatwright' s office, Assemblyman Campbell' s
office, B E & K, USS-POSCO, the Associated Builders and Contractors, the
Central Labor Council, several labor organizations and county staff. We
received a preliminary report from the Director of Personnel based on a
brief analysis of salary and benefit data submitted by B E & K. The
Director of Personnel' s initial review indicates that the health plan
offered to B E & K' s employees is employer paid for the employee but
dependent coverage is available at $112 a month cost to the employee. It
was described as a fairly standard cost-containment policy in that it
includes second opinion requirements for elective surgery, co-payments and
a $500 deductible per person per year.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER .
4?* Fkodn'�&On\_'SIGNATURE s : N cy C. F'ah7deri p^7 T ort
ACTION OF BOARD ON July / , 198 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT If IV AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: County Administrator ATTESTED July 7, 1987
Personnel Director
County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
M382/7-83 B ,DEPUTY
a
Unskilled workers at B E & K start at a minimum of $7. 20 per hour. This
increases to a maximum of $16. 00 per hour for skilled workers. Precisely
comparable data are not readily available because data for USS-POSCO and
local unionized industry are averages at various levels.
B E & K does pay overtime but makes no provision for paid vacation, sick
leave or pension benefits.
The Director of Personnel noted that an accurate comparison with nonunion
employees will require some time to collect.
John Gibson, representing USS-POSCO noted that USS-POSCO had four goals
with their modernization project:
1) To remain in business they have to upgrade and modernize their
plant.
2) To preserve the existing 1100 jobs into the next century.
3 ) To improve the environment by purchasing the best available
equipment.
4) To maintain their tax base in the community.
Mr. Gibson noted that when the contract was awarded in December, 1986
USS-POSCO had three goals in mind:
1) To finish the job on time.
2) To finish the job within budget.
3 ) To complete the job in the most efficient manner possible.
The contract which was awarded to B E & K required the contractor to hire
locally, to provide training to employees to upgrade their skills and to
provide a reasonable benefit package.
Scott Robertson, Director of Communications for B E & K noted that B E & K
has an extensive training program underway to upgrade the skills of the
employees they hire so that when they leave the area they will leave behind
a trained work force who will find it easier to obtain a paying job.
At this point B E & K has hired 321 individuals, 75% - 800 of whom are
local in that they live within 100 miles of the job site. Mr. Robertson
noted that 420 of B E & K' s subcontractors are unionized and all but one of
the subcontractors are from California. In answer to a question from
Supervisor Torlakson Mr. Robertson indicated that employment by B E & K
will peak at 800 and that the job will be completed by the end of 1988.
Art Carter, speaking on behalf of the Central Labor Council, disputed that
B E & K has hired local residents. He maintained that when the job is over
the workers will move to other areas to find jobs. Mr. Carter' asked
B E & K what their safety record is under OSHA. Mr. Paul Liles, General
Counsel for B E & K indicated he was not sure but could supply that infor-
mation. Generally, B E & K believes they have a good safety record. Again
in response to a question from Mr. Carter about B E & K' s affirmative
action program Mr. Robertson indicated they could obtain that information.
Mr. Carter asked how many employees were at each wage level. Mr. Robertson
indicated his guess that 75% are not at the lowest category. He also noted
that this is proprietary information which B E & K does not wish to release
unless such information is required of all contractors.
Mr. Lonnie Reid of the Associated Builders and Contractors noted that
unions have priced themselves out of the market locally because competition
is national and international.
Steve Roberti, President of the Central Labor Council noted that construc-
tion workers are not transient. Most workers work and live in this county.
Mr. Roberti disagreed with Mr. Cisterman that the health plan offered is
comparable to industry standards. Mr. Roberti questioned why an employee
would pay for dependent care when the county hospital is available at
little or no cost. He also maintained that the wage rates paid by B E & K
are not comparable. He suggested that the lack of paid vacation, sick
leave and pension show that benefits are not comparable. It was noted that
the salary ranges offered for B E & K were apparently absolute high and low
ranges while the figures for USS-POSCO and local industry were average at
each level and were, therefore not entirely comparable without further
analysis.
Mr. Michael Munoz of the Carpenters Union noted that they had surveyed the
cars coming through the B E & K gate at USS-POSCO and disputed B E & K' s
contention that 750 - 800 of the employees were local. They observed of
280 workers, 122 out-of-state license plates and 158 California. Of the
California license plates, which they checked through DMV, 52 showed an
address which Mr. Munoz described as being more than 100 miles from the job
site.
Earl MacIntyre of USS-POSCO disputed this information on the basis that
they had made their own survey of license plates and their results showed
45 out-of-state plates and 109 California plates.
Based on all of these charges and counter charges and the lack of compara-
ble data our Committee has concluded that it is essential that objective
data be gathered which is comparable and will either confirm or dispel the
questions which have been raised. We are therefore making the above
recommendations.
Specifically in relation to the last recommendation Supervisor Fanden noted
her dismay that Contra Costa County had to build the main detention facili-
ty in Martinez with imported steel and that the Antioch Bridge was built
with imported steel all apparently because the County cannot apply a
"buy-American" preference to the awarding of such bids. As a result
Supervisor Fanden asked that County Counsel provide an explanation as to
why this was the case and what would be needed to change the rules on
awarding such bids. County Counsel indicated that it would require changes
in federal law.
cc: County Administrator
County Counsel
Director of Personnel
Congressman Miller (Pleasant Hill Office)
Congressman Dellums
Senator Boatwright (Concord Office)
Senator Petris
Assemblyman Baker
Assemblyman Bates
Assemblyman Campbell (Richmond Office)
Assemblyman Isenberg
Paul Liles, B E & K
Scott Robertson, B E & K
Earl MacIntyre, USS-POSCO
Lonnie Reid, Associated Builders & Contractors
Steve Roberti, Central Labor Council