Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09161986 - 1.29 AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Y CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FINAL APPROVAL NEEDED BY: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT �BOARO OF SUPERVISORS T/C 2 7 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ACCOUNT CODING BUDGET UNIT: PURI Ir WORK; f)FPARTMFKIT ORGANIZATION EXPENDITURE SUB-ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION CECR EASE INCREASE 100 100 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY I I I I FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT I , I ' I 1 7505 2250 HIRED EQUIPMENT $ 14,000 00 750.5 2310 PROFESSIONAL AND SPECIALIZED SERVICES I 20,00000 7505 2302 COUNTY EQUIPMENT I 2,000, 00 I � � I I ' 7505 6301 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES I 36,000100 7505 6301 APPROPRIABLE NEW REVENUE $ 36,00000 I I I , I I I I I 1 I ' I I I I I I , I I I I I � . I I TOTALS $ 36,000po $ 72,000 ,00 PROVED _- EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-'CO ROLLK a �98C ^ By: z / Dote TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT TREE REMOVAL PROGRAM COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD ON JULY 15, 1986, PER ATTACHED By: Date BOARD ORDER, WITH FUNDS FROM THE C.D.B.G. PROGRAM, � � BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WITH LOCAL MATCH FROM SPECIAL DISTRICT AUGMENTATION Supervisors Powers,Fanden, FUNDS AND DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE. YES: Schroder,MCPeak,TorlaksoR N 0: Phil Batchelor. Clerk of the Board of SUP:: jt„arc w,:;,;,Aa,rinistrator Public Works Director 9/2/86 SEP 16 10T SIGN RE - TITLE DATE By: �i Dote APPROPRIATION A POO _4Z . ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev.2/88) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCOUNT CODING BUDGET UNIT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION ACCOUNT REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE <0ECREASE> 100 100 1 I FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1 I I ' I , I � 7505 9967 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM OTHER FUNDS $ 33,000 100 1 I r 7505 9015 SPECIAL DISTRICT AUGMENTATION rcl 3,000 100 1 r I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I � I I TOTALS $ 36,000 ;00 ,APP OVED ! EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-,C LLER =�P 3 /� By: Date/ APPROPRIABLE REVENUE FROM SPECIAL DISTRICT AUGMENTATION- COUNTY COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR $ 3,000. , COUNTY DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE - $ 3,000. , By: 41�o' Date AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT - $ 30,000. PER BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BOARD ORDER. YES: Supervisors Powers,Fanden, Schroder,McPeak,Torlaksv� NO: Phil Batchelor, Clerk of the Board of lic Works Director 9/2/86TITLE DATE SIJ,er'V13:;,S and County Administrator Date SEP 16 1986 REVENUE ADJ. RAOO SO,2V JOURNAL NO. (M 8134 Rev. 2/86) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM.: Contra Finance Committee Costa DATE: ., Jt:ly 15, 1986 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION ON DOWNED TREE REMOVAL PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION Recommendations: 1 . Approve allocation of $3 ,.000 each_...-in _..Special _`District Augmentation Funds and -County Drainage, Maintenance -Funds to act as the 200 county match funding for a Community Development Block Grant (Attachment A) to remove downed trees for low and moderate income residents along natural creeks in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County; 2. Authorize the Chief Engineer as coordinator of the project to set income eligibility criteria for residents of the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County as established by the most recent published income :limits set by HUD for the Community Development Block Grant Program in the San Francisco Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) (Attachment B) and 3 . Approve, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, initial concentration of county work efforts in the San Pablo and Wildcat Creek Watershed areas which have been identified by the Chief Engineer as having the most press- ing problem of downed trees in unincorporated Contra Costa County. Financial Impact: - A one-time expenditure of $3 , 000 of Special District Augmentation Funds"and $3 , 000 of County General Drainage Maintenance Funds. Reasons for Recommendation/Background: /I '✓ �� is 1 A, The County has secured a, $30,000 Community_ Development. B1ock�.Gtant to . assist in the removal of downed--trees for low to moderate income-persons in unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County. The grant was awarded due to a demonstrated need to remove_..downed..trees which...had been undercut by high creek. . flows _for. an extended period of time. The trees were not eligible for removal under County _General ._Drainage Maintenance Policy and City Maintenance Policies. As a result, low to moderate income persons residing along these affected creeks would have to bear the cost of removal. Such costs could prove to be beyond the means 'of many of the low to moderate income residents. As condition of the award of CBDG funds the County was required to put forth a 20% match. The amount needed is $6,000 and must be expended prior to the use of the CBDG Funds . CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT; _ YES • SIGNATURE: y_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF B OMMITTEE APPROVE OT SIGNATURE I S I: Supervisor Tom Torlakson Su R t Schroder ACTION OF BOARD ON _ j'tiIiy 15, 1986 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X IV I HEREBY CERTIFY .THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: County Administrator ATTESTED . July 15, 1986 Community Development Director PHIL BATCHELOR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Public Works Director 12MM SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR B ,DEPUTY �1tJ M382/1-83