Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 11291977 - R 77O IN 1
The following are the calendars prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator, and Public Works Director for Board consideration. 00001 JAMES P. KENNY.RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS tVARREN N.BOGGESS 1 ST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN NANCY C.FAHOEN. MARTIN£ZZ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ROBERT SCHRODER 2ND DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERT I SCHRODER.LAFAYETTE AND FOR JAMES R.OLSSON.COUNTY CLERK 3RD DISTRICT SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD AND ER OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT BOARD CHAMBERS.ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CHIEF CLERK ERIC H.HASSELTINE.PITTSBURG P.O.BOx 911 PHONE 14 1 51 372-2371 5TH DISTRICT MARTINEZ.CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY NOVEMBER 29, 1977 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator, Consider "Items Submitted to the Board. " Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. Consider recommendations of Board Committees. 9:45 A.M. -Executive Session (Government Code Section 54957. 6) as required or recess. 10:40 A.M. Consider ambulance service rate adjustments. 10:45 A.M. Time fixed to consummate purchase of R. Y. Moore property (1211 and 1215 Escobar Street, Martinez) required for County Civic Center. 10: 50 A.M. Hearing on proposed Subdivision 4952 Annexation (San Ramon area) to County. Service Area M-22. 10: 55 A.Y. Hearing on request of Concord TV Cable for rate increase and modification of rate setting procedure. 11:00 A.M. As ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District receive bid proposals for provision of weed abatement services. 11:05 A.M. Presentation of awards to Mrs. Eleanor Scott for forty years of dedicated service in the interest of children and their families. 11:10 A.M.- hearing on joint appeal of Kay Building Company and Danville Station Homeowners Association from Planning Commission denial of application to gain approval of Final Development Plan 3032-77, Danville area. 11:40 A.M. As ex officio the Governing Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15, hearing or. Resolution of Intention -o adopt Rasolu-ion of Necessity to acquire certain real proaerty in the Bethel Island area by eminent domain (continued :_om November 15) . 11:Y5 A.._. recision on appeal o_ tou.a Hila Property Owners Associa- si ori, Inc. , from Manning �%-.'o mission condi t-ional appro'7al of tentative map of Subdivision 4915 (Slbaco, Inc. applicant) , Alamo area (Nearing closed November 22� . 2-00 P. s. Budget Study Session. 000102 Boa. 29, 1977 Page 2 ITEN3 SUBMITTED TO TH3 30AF0 IT7YS 1 - 7: CQ SE T 1. ADOPT ordinance amending the County Ordinance Code with respect to (a) salary of employees who voluntarily demote; and (b) mileage compensation for employees using their private automobile. for county business. 2. AUTHORIZ3 Auditor to cancel redemption_ penalty and fee on 1976-77 secured assessment roll. 3. D3NY the claim of Steve F. Smyers, and the application of 3dmond Cleveland for permission to present a late claim. 4. ADOPT resolution authorizing City of Concord to inspect buildings in connection with proposed Cook Annexation. 5. FIX December 27, 1977 at the times indicated for hearings on the following planning matters: 11:15 a.m. Appeal of Roy Amador from Board of Appeals denial of application (Land Use Permit 2061-77) for approval of establishment of a mobile home for family member; 11: 30 a.m. Recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to request of Mr. Jay Herman (2138-RZ) to rezone land in the Pacheco area, and for approval of a development plan (3053-77) ; 11 : 35 a.m. Recommendation of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Ccm issien with rearect to request of Xr. `. gyne Schlosser (2133-RZ) to rezone land in the Danville area, and for approval of a develop- plan ( ?517-77) . 6. FIX January 3, 1978 at 11:00 a.m. for hearing on Planning Commission recommendation with respect to proposed amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance (repeal of Title 9 and reenact- ment of same in amended fora) . 7. ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of official canvass of votes cast in election held November 8 pertaining to formation of and maximum tax rate for Zone No. 1, Syron Fire Protection District. The measure carried. Items 8 - 13: DEVRMIYATIO`d (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) 8. MEMORAy`UM from County Health Officer and Public Works Director (in response to Board referral) recommending that Mr. R. F. Mygrant be granted a permit to install a sewage treatment facility to serve the Laze M Marina, subject to proper operating procedures. APPROVE R3CO MENDATION 9. MEMORA SUM from Director of Planning advising that the Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee recommends approval of the request of Kensington Community Service District for transfer of 54,300 held in the Park Dedication Trust Fund to complete a children's play area in the Kensington Park. APPROVE R3CONME D ATIO?1 10. LFTT3R from County Sheriff-Coroner stating that he was elected for a four-year term and there should be no removal of coroner's duty during his term unless sufficient cause exists, that the coroner function is being performed well, and that the Attorney General is required to act, where a conflict could or does exist. REFER TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Nov. 29, 1977 Page 3 Il. LETTER from Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training, U. S. Department of Labor, urging prime sponsors to reassess and reprogram funds to enable the CETA Public Service Employ- ment program to reach established goals. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HU!-'AN RESOURCES AGENCY 12. LETTER from Dean of -Natural Sciences, Los Medanos College, expressing concern with respect to level of funding allocated for Emergency Medical Services Program and urging that consideration be given to increased f"ur-ding. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HCTi-A,N RESOURCES AGENCY 13. LETTER from Chairman, Bethel Island Area Citizens Group for Boating Safety and Law Enforcement, suggesting that in addition to replacement and installation of speed signs in Delta waterways, postars also be placed in various business locations. RE? TO COUINTY SHERIrF-CORONER Items 14 - 17: INFOR�NL4TION (Copies of eommuni--ations iste as information items have been furnished to all interested paries. ) 14. LETTER from Chairperson, Contra Costa County Alcoholism Advisory Board, advising that said Board recommends placement of the administration of the proposed Correctional and Detention Services Advisory Commission in the Office of the County Administrator. 15. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that said Board supports the establishment of a Correctional and Detention Services Advisory Commission with its administration located in the County Administrator's Office. 16. LETTER from 1L. J. G. Hupp, Orinda, urging that the functions of County Sheriff and Coroner be separated. 17. ANNUAL report of Contra Costa County Medical Services Methadone Treatment Program for period from July 1, 1976 through Jure 30, 1977. Persons addressing the Board should complete the =orm rrovided on the rostrum and furnish the Clerk with a orritten cors of their uresentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITE14S: dEDNESDAY, 5 P.Y. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Finance Committee (Supervisors R. I. Schroder and J. P. Kenny) meets the 1st and 3rd Mcndays of each month, 9:00 a.m. , Room 108, County Administration Building, .Martinez. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 00004 .1 t OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions November 29, 1977 From: Arthur G. Will County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To Probation 581 Typist Clerk Human Services Trainee-CETA Worker II-CETA X581-22 Public 079 Weed and Weed Control Works 4030 Vertebrate Pest Technician Control Inspectors, 001 and #02; also delete class of Need Control Leadman Sheriff 2545 Senior Clerk Sheriff's Process Coroner #01 Clerk 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation County 0003 1 Management -- ._ Administrator Analyst III Civil 582 1 Communications -- service Equipment (PSE) Trainee-CETA 581 1 Graphics 1 Typist Clerk Aide-CETA Trainee-CETA, Q10 Medical 540 1 Storekeeper 1 Storeroom Clerk Services .05 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Ad=inistrator Re: Reccutmendee Actions 11-29-77 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS - continued 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Medical 540 1 22/40 Exempt 1 P.I. Exempt Medical Services Medical. Staff Staff Dentist, , #801 Dentist Public 650 1 Intermediate 1 P.I. Typist Clerk Works Typist Clerk #801 0475 Water Quality Control Operator 11 (class only) 3. Adopt resolution establishing an additional 34 CETA Title VI project positions to be allocated to various County depart- ments in accordance with revised CETA hiring schedule recommended by the Public Service Employinent Committee of the Manpower Advisory Council. II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 4. Name and Destination, Department and Date Meeting (a) Jonna Stratton Seattle, WA National Drug Medical Services 4-3-77 to 4-8- 77 Abuse Conference (b) Robert Jornlin Washington, D. C. APWA National Social Setvice 12.-5-7.7 to 12-9-77 Conference (c) Roger Tumbaga Fresno, CA Joint Funding Human Services 12-5-77 to 12-6-77 Programs Study Advisory Commission III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTb�TTS 5. District Attorney. Appropriate $40,720 for salary and wage benefit costs for six clerical positions fully financed by the State pursuant to approved contract with the Employment Development Department. 00006 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-29-77 Page: 3. III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS - continued 6. .Planning. Appropriate $75,575 of additional revenue to be received for services provided by the department in accordance with contracts approved by the Board. 7. Sheriff's Radio Facilities. Add $5,225 for communications equipment to be provided for emergency ambulance users. (Costs are recovered under lease terra from users. ) 8. Riverview Fire Protection District. Adjust various district appropriations for fire alarm' system and add $210 for increased cost of installation. of ceiling insulation. 9._ Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following budget units: Delta Municipal Court, Plant Acquisition, Probation. 10. County Auditor-Controller. Adjust 1976-1977 appropriations of various county departments and districts in' accordance with reported final expenditures. IV. LIENS AND .COLLECTIONS None. V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 11. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period (a) Intergovern- Area Agency on $2,500 8-15-77 mental Manage- Aging, training to ment Develop- needs survey 9-30-77 ment Institute (IMDI) (b) Carquinez Third Year Commu- $5,500* 7-1-77 Women's Club nity Development to Program Activity 6-30-78 140 Amendment * (additional funds) 00007 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-29-77 Page: 4. V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS - continued 11. Agency Purpose Amount Period (c) Young women's Continuation of day $8 ,500 7-1-77 Christian care services for to Association of children of AFDC 6-30-78 Contra Costa recipients enrolled County in Work Incentive (WIN) training programs (d) Martinez Bus Transportation of $51,660 10-1-77 Lines, Inc. mentally retarded to adults to sheltered 3-31-78 workshops (e) Contra Costa Sheltered workshop $226,930 10-1-77 County Assn. services for 91 to for the mentally retarded 9-30-78 Mentally adults Retarded, Inc.. VI. LEGISLATION None. VII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 12. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a lease renewal between County and Robert M. Barrett for premises at 1180 Brown Avenue, Lafayette for continued use bar the Public Works Department for communication equipment used at the Lafayette Corporation Yard. 13. Authorize Lease Management Division, Public 'Works Department, to negotiate for additional space for the federally sub- vented Law and Justice Systems Development project in Concord through June 30, 1978, 14. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a five-year agreement between County and Alameda-Contra Costa Transit .District by which the District will use a portion of county-leased communication side on Kregor Peak. To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-29-77 Page: 5. VIII.OTHER ACTION 15. Authorize reimbursement of $78 to Mr. James D. Matheron, . 279 Gladys Drive, Pleasant Hill, and $49 to Deputy Sheriff Larry Tannehill, 1114 Pine Street, Martinez, both for the loss of personal property (eyeglasses) incurred in the line of duty. 16. Authorize settlement of claims in the amount of $1,645 resulting from conciliation agreement and authorize Director of Personnel to execute the necessary documents. 17. Approve termination of Emergency Foster Home Program Agreement No. 20-170 with Mrs. Donna B. Long, as recommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency. 18. Acknowledge receipt of report from Director, Human Resources Agency, on impact of continued drought on Social Service operations. 19. Acknowledge receipt of status report from the . Director, Human Resources Agency, on the proposed Family Stress Center. 20. Introduce ordinance amendment providing for exemption of the position of Public Information Assistant; waive reading and fix December 6 , 1977 for adoption; position will perform information duties for Water Agency and for Board of Supervisors. 21. As recommended by the Director of Personnel, adopt resolution indicating intent to participate in CSAC cooperative program for administration of unemployment insurance effective January 1, 1978, and authorize Director of Personnel to proceed with required impl( menting actions. NOTE Following presentation of the County Administrator' s agenda, the Chairman will ask if anyone in attendance wishes to comment. Issues will be carried over to a later time if extended discussion is desired. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 12 NOON 00009 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California TO: Boa_d of Supervisors FROM: Vernon L. Cline Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Works Extra Business for November 29 , 1977 GENERAL Item 1. DETENTION FACILITY PROJECT - APPROVE BID ADDENDUM - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and autho- rize the Public Works Director to issue an addendum to plans and specifications for the Detention Facility Project approved 3n October 25, 1977 . The adde*adum is Addendum 2 - Detention Facility Plumbing, Project No. 5269-926- (48) . The addendum, dated November 22, 1977 and presented to the Board on that date, modifies plans and specifications as requested by Kaplan/McLaughlin, the project architects. Turner Construction Company, the project construction managers, anticipates no change in cost because of this addendum. Bids will continue to be received on December 1, 1977. (RE: Project No. 5269-926- (48) ) (DFP) Item 2. DETENTION FACILITY PROJECT - APPROVE BID ADDENDUM - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and autho- rize the Public Works Director to issue an addendum to plans and specifications for the Detention Facility Project approved on October 25, 1977 . The addendum is Addendum 3 - Detention Facility Electrical, Proect No. 5269-926- (46) . Ad The addendum modifies the light fixture specification as requested by Kaplan/McLaughlin, the project architects . Turner Construction Company, the construction managers, anticipates a minor cost reduction because of this addendum. Bids will continue to be received on December 1, 1977. (RE: Project No. 5269-926- (46) ) (DFP) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page 1 of 2 November 29, 1977 00010 Item 3. SHERIFF'S REHABILITATION CENTER - REJECTION OF BIDS - Clayton Area The Public Works Director received two bids for construction of the Kitchen/Dining Hall Facility, Sheriffis Rehabilitation Center, Marsh Creek Road, Clayton, on November 3, 1977 and both bids were excessive and beyond available funds. The project is funded wholly by a Grant from the Economic Develop- ment Administration. The County has received an extension to the time within which on-site labor must begin. It is recommended that the Board reject, all bids and order the Public Works Director to revise plans and specifications and. re- advertise for bids. Revision of the plans and specifications will not alter compliance with general and environmental review requirements. (RE: 4411-4061) (B&G) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page 2 of 2 November 29, 1977 00011 � r d PUi; I�RfGS DEPARTMENT � CONTRA COSTA COUNT Y ' Date: November 29, 1977 To: Board of Supervisors From: Vernon L. Cline, Public Works Director Subject: Contract Award Recommendation Re: Project No. 5269-926- (50) Supervisorial District II 'Bids for the construction of the Detention Facility Precast Concrete were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on Wednesday, November 23, 1977. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the construc- tion contract to the low bidder, Basalt Rock Company of Napa, California, in the amount of $646,450. The Construction Manager' s final estimate was $630,000. Other bids received were as follows: 1. Tecon Pacific, West Sacramento, California $674,000 VLC:kac cc: County Administrator County Counsel Clerk of the Board Detention Facility Project R , 00012 1 _ w� r I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Vernon L. Cline Public Works Director 4 SUBJECT: Public Works Agenda for November 29, 1977 REPORTS None SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I No Items ' SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 1. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 - AUTHORIZE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE GRANT DOCUMENTS - Port Costa Area Upon the recommendation of the Citizens' Advisory Committee, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio Governing Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5, authorize the Public Works Director, as Engineer ex officio of the District, to execute all documents necessary for the District to obtain a Clean Water Grant from the State and Federal governments. The Grant will enable the District to finance a Study of Wastewater Treatment Alternatives. The Study is required by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board and would investigate possible physical alternatives the District could construct to comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-500) . The District is currently discharging wastewater effluent in viola- tion of P.- L. 92-500. Compliance under the law had been scheduled for July 1, 1977. A new compliance time schedule will most probably be adopted at the December meeting of the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board, which will take into account the addi- tional time needed to conduct the Study. (RE: Work Order 5418-0927) (EC) im> Item 2. CENTER AXTENUE - ACCEPT DEED - Pacheco Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract, dated November 16, 1977, from the Mt. Diablo Unified School District and authorize the Public Works Direc- tor to sign said Contract on behalf of the County. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A_ Public Works Department Page 1 of 8 November 29, 1977 000,111 , .•1 Item 2 Continued: The contract obligates the County to construct approximately 163 _ linear feet of frontage improvements in exchange for approximately 1,300 square feet of School District land. (RE: Project No. 3471-4342-663-76) - (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III .Item 3. COUNTY SERVICE AREA -R-8 - APPROVE PROPERTY ACQUISITION - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, in accordance with ' the provisions of the Agreement dated September 17, 1974, between the City of Walnut Creek and the County, approve the City's proposal to proceed with appraisals and preliminary negotiations for the pur- chase of the Lea property on Oak Road, for park purposes. The acquisition will provide an additional .83 acres to the 3.64 acre Walden Park, previously acquired by the County on behalf of County Service Area R-8. The acquisition will be financed from the proceeds of the $6,750,000 1974 Parks and Open Space Bonds previously authorized by this Board for County Service Area R-8. (SAC) Item 4. CASTLE ROCK ROAD - APPROVE RENTAL AGREEMENT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a Rental Agreement, dated November 21, 1977, signed by Blaik Musolf and Nancy Cutshall for rental of County-owned property at 981 Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the Agreement on behalf of the County. The rental is on a month-to-month "as is" basis for $300 per month, and is effective December 1, 1977. (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DIS'T'RICT IV Item 5. LAS JUNTAS WAY - APPROVE TRAFFIC REGULATION - Walnut Creek Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineer- ing and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution Wo. 2400 be approved as follows: (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 8 November 29, 1977 00014 Item 5 Continued: Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, parking is hsreby declared to be prohibited at all times on the south side of LAS JUNTAS P67AY H4054F) Walnut Creek, beginning at a point 35 feet west of the centerline of Cherry Lane and extending westerly a distance of 40 feet. (TO) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 6. HILLCREST AVENUE - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Antioch Area The work performed under the contract for repair of base failures and placement of asphalt concrete overlay on Hilicrest Avenue be- tween Lone Tree Way and the Contra Costa Canal was completed by the contractor, Antioch Paving Company, Inc. , of Antioch, -on November 10, 1977 , in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $47, 000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of November 10, 1977. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 7561-4407-661-77) (C) Item 7. SUBDIVISION 4620 - ACCEPT SUBDIVISION - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors issue an Order stat- ing that the construction of improvements in Subdivision 4620 has been satisfactorily completed. No County roads were constructed. Subdivider: Mahlon C. Connett 2425 East Street Concord, CA 94520 Location: Subdivision 4620 is located on the south side of Clipper Hill Road (Russ Road) westerly of Bradford Place. (LD) Item 8. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 3B - ADOPT RESOLUTION - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors , as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, adopt a Resolution of Intention to (Continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Departme t _ Page 7 of 8 November 29, 19771t)Il•1 Item 8 Continued: Adopt Resolution of Necessity to acquire real property by eminent domain for the Green Valley Creek-East Branch Detention Basin and set December 20, 1977 at 10:55 a.m. , as the date the Board will meet to consider the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity to condemn. (RE: Work Order 8544-7520) (RP) . Item 9. FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 1 - CONVEY EASEMENT - Brentwood Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorize the Board Chairman to execute, on behalf of the District, a Grant of Easement for use as a roadway for vehicles, pedestrians and animals, to William P. Maggiora, Melvin E. Maggiora and Pierina M. Maggiora pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Right-of-Way Contract which has been previously approved. (RE: Work Order 8314-7521) (RP) (Agenda continues on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 8 November 29, 1977 00016 I � GENERAL Item 10. RECOMMENDATIONS ON AWARD OF CONTRACTS The Public Works Director will present recommendations on the award of contracts for which he has received bids. - (ADM) Item 11. FIRE COLLEGE AND STATION NO. 8 - APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services with John C. Wilson, Architect, for the design of remodeling of Classrooms at the Fire College site on Treat Boulevard and Station_ No. 8 , Concord. The First Amendment is effective November 29, 1977, and provides for an increase in architectural fees due to enlarging the project scope as requested by the Fire District and provides for an amended maximum architectural fee of $22, 000. (RE: 7100-4698) (B&G) Item 12. COUNTY HEALTH CLINIC - APPROVE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT Oakley Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and author- ize the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Frank P. Bellecci, Concord, for a topographic survey at the proposed County Health Clinic site in Oakley. This Agree- ment is effective November 29, 1977. These services are needed to supplement the County effort to meet the schedule requested by the County Medical Services Department to upgrade present facilities. This Agreement provides for a maximum payment to the consultant, in the amount of $2,000, which amount shall not be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. (RE: 4419-4729) (B&G) Item 13. BUCHANAN FIELD - ADOPT RESOLUTION - CLEAR ZONE It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution of Intention to adopt a Resolution of Necessity to condemn property needed for Clear Zone easements in connection with the improvement of the instrument landing system for Runway 19-R, and set Decem- ber 20, 1977, at 11:00 a.m. , as the date the Board will meet to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to Condemn. (RE: Work Order 5438-927) (RP) 00017 A G E N D A_ Public Works Department .0— , o S f ATnet b, 1"Ov- '7Q ! l Q9'7 �I Item 14. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: A. Accept the following instruments: No. Instrument Date Grantor Reference 1. Grant Deed 11-17-77 John Papini, SUB MS 163-75 et al. 2. Relinquishment of 11-17-77 John Papini, SUB MS 163-75 Abutters ' Rights et al. B, Accept the following instruments for recording only: 1. Offer of Dedication 11-16-77 Blackhawk De- SUB 4963 for Drainage Pur- velopment Co. poses 2. Offer of Dedication 11-11-77 Frank's Marina, LUP 2197-75 for Roadway Pur- Inc. poses 3. Offer of Dedication 8-29-77 Tony Cutino, SUB 4922 for Roadway Slope et al. Easement 4. Offer of Dedication 8-29-77 Tony Cutino, SUB 4922 for Roadway Slope et al. Easement (Second Docu- ment) 5. Offer of Dedication 11-17-77 John Papini, SUB MS 163-75 for Roadway Pur- et al. poses 6. Offer of Dedication 11-18-77 Ernest R. SUB MS 27-77 for Roadway Pur- Lasell, Jr. .- poses r. ,poses et al. (LD) Item 15. _ REPORT ON WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES A report on water conservation measures which have been taken to reduce consumption within County Government is submitted for the Board of Supervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. • (JML9) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page -6 of 8 November 29, 1977f1 p 0 . 018 Item 16. WOMEN' S FURLOUGH CENTER - APPROVE CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT Richmond Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Consult- ing Services Agreement with Richard Splenda and Assoc. , of Richmond, for landscape design at the Women' s Minimum Security/Work Education Furlough Center, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the Agreement. This Agreement is effective November 29, 1977 . These services are needed to supplement the County effort to comply with the Law Enforcement Assistance Agency requirements to provide a landscaped facility. This Agreement provides for a maximum payment to the consultant, in the amount of $4,000, which amount shall not be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. (RE: 4411-4722) (B&G) Item 17. INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACTS - APPROVE AMENDMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, acting in its capacity as Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and all fire districts of which it is the ex officio Governing Board, ap- prove the Amendments to the Inspection Services Contracts with Messrs. J. M. .Nelson, Robert G. Grady, Laurel Roderick Cameron and Robert G. Soto, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute same, These Amendments provide for increases in hourly wage rates to compensate inspectors for increased insurance costs which includes Contra Costa County, its officers and employees as additional in- sured. The Amendment with Robert G. Grady also appoints him to Senior Inspector (Mr. Grady is presently filling this position) . This is necessary because our present Senior Inspector is currently assigned to the Detention Facility. (B&G) Item 18. DETENTION FACILITY PROJECT - APPROVE CONTRACT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and author- ize the Public works Director to execute an Inspection Services Contract with Robert G. Grady, 64 Collins Drive, Pleasant Hill, CA 94553, for contract documents review and construction inspection services for the Detention Facility Project. The contract is effective November 29, 1977. Maximum payment shall not exceed sump- $15,000 without written authorization of the Public Works Director. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 7 of 8 November 29, 1977 Item 18 Continued: This contract provides for payment for services in accordance with the standard rates indicates! in the contract. (RE: Work Order No. 5269-926) (DFP) Item 19. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY - WEEKLY REPORT A. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider the attached "Calendar of Water Meetings." B. The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Supervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. C. Memorandum Report on Water Agency Activities - No public hearings or meetings were held during the past week. (EC) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 8 of 8 November 29, 1977 O(W20 Prepared by Chief Engineer of the Conga Costa County Water Agency November 29, 1977 CALENDAR OF HATER NEETINGS TIME ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REMARKS Recommended Authorization Nov 29 Tues. Corps of 7:00 p.m. Public Meeting an Staff Engineers/ Bristol Theatre Permits for Rock Dept. of }dater Edna Hill Barriers across False Resources Jr. High School River and Fisherman's Brentwood Cut, in the Delta s A31 start @ 9:30 a.m. Nov 28 Mon. Senate 'Assembly San Diego Interim Hearings on Staff 30 {tied. Conference San Francisco Peripheral Canal Bill Dec 2 Fri. Committee Redding (S.B. 346-Ayala) 12 Mon. Stockton Dec 8 Thurs. San Joaquin � 10:00 a.m. Public Advisory Staff Valley Inter- Fad Bureau Committee Meeting agency Drainage Office Program 1274 W. Hedges Fresno 0OC121 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9 :00 A.M. , TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 29 , 1977 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman W. N. Boggess, presiding Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, R. I. Schroder, E. H. Hasseltine. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. 00022 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 _Z7- :n the Matter of Ordinance(s) Introduced. The following ordinance(s) which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes December 6, 1977 as the time for adoption of same: Amending Section 32-2.624 of the County Ordinance Code with respect to exempting the Position. of- Pablic Information Assistant.. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors -affixed this 29th day of November . 19 77 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 = fs•h+ obbie ierrez ()()()23 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County and was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORDERS that said ordinances(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law. Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 77-111 Adds Section 36-4.805 with respect Contra Costa to salary of employees who voluntarily Times demote to a position with lower salary schedule and amends Section 36-8.1802 with respect to mileage compensation for employees who use their automobiles for official county business. PASSED on November 29,, 1977 by the following vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES i:0 ABSENT J. P. Kenny (x) ( ) ( } N. C. Fanden (x) ( ) ( ) R. I. Schroder (x) ( ) ( ) W. N. Boggess (x) ( ) ( ) E. H. Hasseltine (x) ( ) ( ) I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November. 19 77 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-nn Robbie tierr 00024 J POS I T I ON A D J U S T M E N T REQUEST No: 04 v Department HRA/MEDICAL SERVICES Budget Unit 540 Date 11-29-77 Action Requested: Reclassify the following positions to Health Care Counsellor II: Clerk 07240, I.T.C, 091-29, L.V,N. (3 positions) 624-10,07,12 Proposed effective date: 11-29-77 Explain why adjustment is needed: to reclassify incumbents to appropriate classification Ontra Costa Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEunty Amount: b. IVED 1 . Salaries a6 wages: NOV $ 2. F`i'xed Asset`s: (.ecat .ctema and coat) 2 9 19�� O $ =� Qw11f7 Ai5ministrcltor s: Estimated total $ ./ Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 29 19 To Civil Service: Recommend approval. a- County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 29, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Clerk, 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk and (3) Licensed Vocational Nurse positions to Health Care Counsellor II. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Health Care Counsellor II. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Clerk, position #20, Salary Level 178 (634-771) ; Intermediate Typist Clerk, position #29, Salary Level 240 (766-931) and Licensed Vocational Nurse, positions #07, 12, 10, Salary Level 259 (812-987) to Health Care Counsellor II, Salary Level 322 (984-1196) . Assistant PersonneLDti rector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: November 29, 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977. I County Adminlrsteator Action of the Board of Supervisors Ov 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED _ ) on N J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: 2 9 1977 BY: APPROVAL o6 thiz adjurtment ccn.6titutez an AppnopAi.eztt.on Adjustmemt and Peuonnet Re,so. cation Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form murt be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00025 I POS I T I ON A D J U S T M E N T REQUEST No: .4-0 Department PROBATION Budget Unit 581 Date 10/25/77 Action Requested: _11assification study for Human Service% Worker 11-CETA for �T Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To determine if CETA employee is properly classified Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Cotta County Amount: 1 . Sal ari g�antl wages: P: ��VED $ 2. Fined Ansett: (ti,6.t stems acid coot) 0cT n r ;n $ Estimated tola"lnt' Admini tor. $ `NI' _ Signature o Department Hea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date:- Oetnher 26, 1977 To Civil Service for review and recommendat�n. Count d strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation , Reclassify 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA to Human Services Worker II-CETA. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Human Services Worker II-CETA. Can be effective day foliowing' Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclas- sification of Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA position #581-22, Salary Level 178 (634-771) to Human Services Worker II-CETA, Salary Level 214T (780-860). Assi5tant Personne irector Kecommenda ion of County AdmM m s rator Uate: November 28, 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977 . County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors V 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSOR, .Coun�§'.Cl,erk Date: NOV 2 9 1977 By; fA ire A.Neutelr,�,' L`'?=' f Clerk APPROVAL o' thi,a adjui;bnent constitutu an Appr�op.vati.o►t Adjws�_rkf:t cued Petus6nnet ? Ruotuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must- be completed and' Srpplemer,ted, when 'appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or 6fffice affected. P1300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) ��(M`, i POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 0 /0 079- Department Public Works Budget Unit 4030 Date October 26, 1977 Action Requested: Cancel position of Weed & Vertebrate Pest Control Inspector (075-001 ;075-002) Add Weed Control Tech. (075-02;075-03) Proposed effective date=LO/26/ Explain why adjustment is needed: The responsibilities of the Weed Control Technicians are current3Zy- bang assigned to Weed & Vertebrate Pest Control Inspectors. Estimated colt al adjustment: Amount: C^=-�%.a 0 1 . '-Sal arf es =and wages: Costa county $ 122 X 2 P si ti ons=$244 2. '.Fixed Assets: (fit .ttema and coat) ;-(I_� f;i $ ------- Estimated tajo $ 244 o Cc; Si gnatur ';�'n' 0 C . epartment Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 1, 1977 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. ount Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 2 Weed and Vertebrate Pest Control Inspectors to Weed Control Technician. Remove the class of Weed Control Leadman. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being ;performed justify reclassification to Weed Control Technician. On November 22, 1977 the Civil Service Commission deleted. the class of Weed Control Leadman. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Weed and Vertebrate Pest Control Inspectors positions #01 and 02, Salary Level 322 (9&4-1196) to Weed Control Technician, Salary Level 354 (1084-1318) ; also by amending Resolution 77/602 by removing the class of Weed Control Leadman, Salary Level 354 (1084-1318). Can be effective day following Boa d action Assistant Personnel/Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 28 . 1977 .M t Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30,' 1977. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors N 0V 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED ) on i R. OLSSO), County/Clerk Date: NOV 2 9 1977 By: lylaxir- M. �J�>>o, 1.f �` Depuiy Clerk APPROVAL oS .tr't.i,a adjustment eon,6t tute,a an Appnopnc.ati.on Adjuzbnent and Peizzcr:neZ p, aotuti.on Amendment. ► ' NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form fmu,6t be completed and supplemented, hen appropr—sale, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 01002-1' r . POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: C> Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 2545 Date July 26, 1977 Action Requested: Reclassify one Senior Clerk position to Legal Clerk and one Inter. Typist Clerk position to/Legal Clerk Proposed effective date:9-1-77 Asst. Explain why adjustment is needed: Duties presently being performed by the incumbents are better described in the job specifications of the Legal Clerk series Estimated cost of adjustment: CoF Cosi-p Count Amount: -(-FIVE D 1 . SaTid riPZ and wages: t- $ 2,102 2. F�i`x —Asset: (tilt .ctema curd coat) A UG ; f T97 C_ r- "ice $ c- ` Adrninis, ., Estimated tIrtment r $ 2,102 Signature read Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: P1 1 9 7 7,— To Civil Service: Request recommend , i LI i!3 06uadlnistratW Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22. 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Sheriff's Process Clerk and classify 1 position. Reclassify 'l Senior Clerk position to Sheriff's Process Clerk. On November 22, 1977, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Sheriff's Process Clerk and recommended 1977-78 Salary Level 304 (931-1132) and 1978-79 Salary Level 320 (978- 1188). Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassifi- cation to Sheriff's Process Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above actions can be accomplished by amending Resolution 77/602 to reflect the adding of Sheriff's Process Clerk, 1977-78 Salary Level 304 (931-1132) and 1978-79 Salary Level 320 (978-1188); also by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Senior Clerk, position #01, Salary Level 280 (865-1052) to Sheriff's Process Clerk, Salary Level 304 (931-1132). Can be effective day followin Board action. , This class is not exempt from overtime. Assistant PersonW Director Recommendation of County Administrator ua e:-NQ1 pmbar ?$r 1877 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977 . O / County AdminUtfatdir Action of 'the Board of Supervisors N 011 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R.Makx SON, r unty e�rk NOV 91977 By: f.611 Date: 2 ' if12 �:cute6; i Daputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 .th,iz adju6tmeyit eon t tutea an Appnopnc.citi.on Adjurtment and PeJus.on;t,i Reaot tion Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mut be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) (h)(128 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: LO� j f Department County Administrator Budget Unit 0003 Date 11/15/77 Action Requested: Add (1) Management Analyst III Proposed effective date: 12/1/77 Explain why adjustment is needed: -;uj2nlemgnt Capital Planning Program per Board approval in 1977-1978 Final Budget. Estimated ca-Z o� adjustment: Amount: Ld 1 . Sal avis bd wages: $ 12,6b0 2. --F-i xeq�-AssWts: J tint .c tema and cost? t -- - Estimated total $ 12 CO-0 Signature Departme Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 16 77 Request classification determination. County n rator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Management Analyst III position. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Management Analyst III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Management Analyst III position, Salary Level 488 (1632-1983). Assistant Personn Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 28, 1977 71. Reco-emendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service commission approved effective November 30, 1977. County A ministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on NOV 2 9 1977 J. R. OLSS N,,;'Oounty .Clerics Date: NOV 2 9 1977 By. " M.3xia M.1fenf ! ,i eP�tY:CDerr, APPROVAL o6 this adjustmejit eonzt tutes an Apptcop&i,ati.on AdjLLsbnen)-',and Pe4zon'ne"2 Resotuti.on Amendment. i NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form rmuh t be completed and supplemenfed, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00029 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: /0/ YP Civil Service Department1�c Department Public Service Employment Budget Unit �rQate 11/18/77 Action Requested: Classify Z Communications Ecuinment OTrainee-CETA Dosition. Proposed effective datEn 1 77 Explain why adjustment is needed: To implement approval of Sheriff's Office CETect;. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: Counfy 1 . Salaries and wages: 2. Fixed Assets: (tiAt i tema and coat) O. 0J rice Estimated to y:n AI �c $ r, Signature i for epartment Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date:- County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: %InvpTnhPr,1R- 1477 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Communications Equiprent Trainee-CETA position. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Communications Equipment Trainee-CETA. Can be effective December l; 1977. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/l7 by adding (1) Communications Equipment Trainee-CETA, Salary Level 203t (754-832) . for personnel Directo Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 28, 1977 q}y- Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30,. 1977. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors t)0 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. O ,SSON, C . ty C1erk N O V 2 9 1977 Date:' By: iputy. Clea. APPROVAL o� tJLiA adjub#ment cont tutea an Appxopni.ati.on Adjustmekt and, P&.sonnee Reaotuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Tom section and reverse side of form fmu6t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00030 P 0 S I T I ON A D J U S T M E N T R E 0 U E S T No: Civil Service Department Department Public service Emnlovment Budget Unit 50- Date 11/Is 77 Action Requested: Classify (1) Graphics Aide-CETA position and cancel (1) Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA, position #581-10. Proposed effective da e: 12/1/77 Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify position assigned to County Schools Department. Estimated cost of adjustment: Costa Amount: County 1 . Salaries and wages: R�--C�!\/ED$ 2. Fixed Assets: (i"t -items and coat) _ t O�'ice of Estimated to $ ctor, Signature for Department Hea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: i County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Fehriiary 18. 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Graphics Aide-CETA and cancel 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Graphics Aide-CETA. Can be effective December 1, 1977. Tile above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Graphics Aide-CETA, Salary Level 235 (754-917) and the cancellation of 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA, position #10, Salary Level 178 (634-771) q1I V, t� for lersonne Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: No mber 28, 1977 �p Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977. xowd' County Wi strator Action of the Board of Supervisors NOV 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSN', County Clerk ', N 0 V 2 9 1977 - a, /, Date: B . I't;f-xitta M- A: �er le!d Deputy Clerk , APPROVAL os .thin adju6;bne;Lt eon,6t tutes a;: Appnophiati.on Adjuhtment and Pepzonnet Resotuti.on Amendment. t NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form fmu6 t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. ??1 P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) (Y)031 POSITION0 N ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department CCCo. Medical Services Budget Unit 540 Date 10/4/77 Action Requested: Add one Storekeeper position; cancel storeroom Clerk Position #130-05 Proposed effective date: as soon as j�o_ssiM e Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide adequate staffing for main storeroom Stores Department Estimated cwt adjustment: Contra Cosia County Amount: C' I r-4 — 1 . =Salaries -and wages: RECENED s 2. :_Eixed4Assets: (Wt item6 and cost) Ney t1977 efff.'re C) $ f fnt-/ AdIrrinistra-,or $ AGENCY Estimated toF � A 2Dt�t rovodiV-MrProV0Signature Georqe Degnan, M.D., Xbdic4l Director e. Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November- 107 To Civil Service for review and recommen!ati n. Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify I Storekeeper position and cancel 1 Storeroom Clerk Position. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Storekeeper. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by am-ending Resolution 71117 to reflect the additio of I Storekeeper, Salary Level 341 (1042-1267) and the cancellation of I Storeroom Clerk, position #05, Salary Level 279 (863-1049). Assistant Personnel rector Recommendation of County Administrator 11 Date: November 3, 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Nov Z 111977 Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: NOV 2 9 1977 axine t..t UePt�-Y7.,crerk— APPROVAL o6 thiz adjustmeivt coa6titut" on APPUPxiatioi AdillAtment and Pmonyi41 Ruotution Amendment. A- NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mcat tE completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (1,247) (Rev. 11/70) 0001- 2 P O S T F I 0 N A D J U S T M E N T R E Q U E S T No: Department CCCo. Medical Services Budget Unit Son Date ,nom-,-, Action Requested: Cancel P.I. Medical Staff Dentist position 520-801; add Medical Staff Dentist (22/40) Permanent-Pa: = time position Proposed effective date:11/1/77 i Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide adequate service in the Dental Clinic i c-- bt, Estimated`cost;orf a4.ustment: - Costa County Amount: 1 . Sal ari ei and_,wages: RECEIVED $ 2. Fixed Assets2 (ZZ6t item6 and co.6t) L._ 0 7 1 7 ti $ Offin o iy Administrator .�G_-ICY Estimated f all' $ Signature George Degnan, M.D. , dical Director Date.--- Head � � i Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: l November 15, i 0- To Civil Service for review and recommendation County Adtm ni or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22_, 1477 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify_1 Exempt Medical Staff Dentist 22/40 position and cancel 1 Permanent Intermittent Exempt Staff Dentist position. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as 22/40 Exempt Medical Staff Dentist. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 22/40 Exempt Medical Staff Dentist, Salary Level 635e (2433-31051 and the cancellation of I Permanent Intermittent Exempt Medical Staff-Medivat Dentist, position #801, Salary Level 635e (2433-3105). Assistant Personne ector ecommen d ion 0 County Administrator ate: _�j�vemher 28, 977' Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977 . County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors NOV 2 v JQj Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on J. R. OLS.SONI,_ County C16rk NOV 2 9 Date: T°77 B. : ` a epu�, Clerk Maxine APPROVAL o6 th i a ad j u6tmui t con t tute.6 an Apptcop.kia tion Ad j u6tr.ent and Pex6 onuet Resotutc:on Amendmeitt. .) )' NOTE: Toe section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300- (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 000' POS I T I ON A D J US TMENT:, REO'UEST No: 3 � � Department Public Works Budget Unit 650 Date May 16, 1977 er Action Requested: Reclassify one Intermediate Typist-Clerk permanent intermittent(650-801) Int_,mediate to permanent full-time /Typist-Clerk " � Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly staff the Land Development Division Estimat4 cosi:Zf adjustment: � j' nom Amount: 1 . Sal-aries- and wages: $ 440,00 Mo. 2. Eyed ,'sets: (t,czt item apid co.bt) 1 . Estimated total $ 440.00 Mo. Signature 411L'7y' Department H Initial Determination of County Administrator ate.—November 2. 1977 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 full-time (40/40) Intermediate Typist Clerk position and cancel 1 permanent intermittent Typist Clerk position. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as full-time Intermediate Typist Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 full-time Intermediate Typist Clerk, Salary Level 240 (766-931), and the cancellation of 1 permanent intermittent Typist Clerk, position #801, Salary Level 194 (666-809) . Assistant Person Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 28, 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 2 9 1977 R. OLSSON, 91xlty' Clerk Date: '64 2 9 1972 By: /, �fdXrneM-,�:,.,°:. , '• 1� ep�ry Clerk i APPROVAL of thin adjuhtment eotl6titutu an Appnopni.ati.on Adfud;bnent' -andTeMonneZ ResoZuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form rruat be completed and supplemented',`when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) {)()034 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: �Q Department Pubes Works Budget Unit 0475 Date 8/30/77 Action Requested: Create class for Water Quality Control Operator II Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To more accurately reflect duties and responsibilities due to increasing workload. See attached -lob spec. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Safariefan(,,,wages: $ 133,00 per Mo 2. Fii ec[ Asset (LL6t items and cost) niis d lliic:ate _ Estimated total $,,--)133. o vex Mo origin mas:, ocessed �6" 5/6/77 and w�,lost. Signature � 4ri; nt ead Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 8-31-77 To Civil Service: Request recommendat' Cou'Mtryy ArMIMistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 22, 1977 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Water Quality Control Operator II. On November 22, 1977, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Water Quality Control Operator II and recommended 1977-78 Salary Level 405T (1397-1540) and 1978=79 Salary Level 421T (1467-1617). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 77/602 by adding Water Quality Control Operator. II, Salary Level 405T (1397-1540). Can be effective day following Board action. This class is not exempt from overtime. Assistant Ters-onnO Director Recomatendation of County Administrator Date: November 28, 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, 1977. County Ad i ni stratCr` Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on NOV 2 9 1971 r J. R. OLS.QN, County Clerk Date: 'NOV 2 9 1977 ' By• _ Wine M.�eufuC �► � � ,Deputy Clerk APPROVAL os this adjustment conAtitute.s an Appn.opti,ati.on Adjuatnent and Peuonnet Re6oZuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and and reverse side of form mu4t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) �����13 1 r" • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY rL, ' APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT t ' TJC 2T ACCOUNT Col1Ac 1. DEPARTMENT Of 01CANIIATIIN IIIT: DISTRICT ATTOR14EY (CC #242) ORIANIZATIll 301-0IJECT 2. FIXED ASSET t,1ECAEASI> INCREASE 11JECT OF EXPENSE OA FIXED ASSET ITEM NI. 14VANTITT 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingencies 40,720 2800 1011 Permanent Salaries 35,241 1042 F. I.C.A. Expense 1,950 1060 Employee Health Insurance 3,287 2310 Professional and Personal Services 125 2361 Workers Compensation 117 0990 6301 Appropriable Revenue 46) 2� APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER The District Attorney has contracts with the �rl: Date Employment Development Department (EDD) which By' were executed by the Chairman, Board of Super- visors for funding 100% salary costs for 6 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR clerical positions during this fiscal year. The contracts alsoinclude an additional 28% By: DOtO l - to cover the costs of fringe benefits. The salary costs shown above also include $1,902 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of vacation accruals. Revenue Account #9425 Supervisors Kenny,Fand- (Org. #2800) State Aid - Employment and Training. YES: &hroatT,DgSgess,Hassetune The funds required by this adjustment are 100% reimbursable by the State. NO: N0V 2 9 19 7 00i Chief Ass't. 11 77 J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4. 16�_ MichaeliJ�. _ helan rIru DATE By: - � ;L f APPROPRIATION APOO5675 •,,'.;> rte: :^-r•.^z Ali. AIDNA: No. �� 3 (M 129 Raw. 77) SEE iNITRUCT10Nt ON REVERSE �i�� SE SIDE t 7/ 0 mw - s CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCOUNT COO11C L DEPARTNENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: District Attorney 01CANIZATION REVENUE z. INCREASE <DECREASE> ACCOUNT REVENUE DESCRIPTION i 2800 9425 St Aid Employment 4 Training APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER To increase estimated revenue for salary costs By: UK�- Date i(/21/-7-1 associated with 6 positions in the District Attorney's Office funded from the Employment Development Department. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR N OV 1 By: Dote ` BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Surcrvisors Kenny.Fanden YES: Schrader,Bvjbv,,.Il.,ssedrine NO: '1'L�Li. D04OV/ 2/9 77 J.R. OLSSOD , CLERK,,-- T' TC By .oh'.,i; Gni, REVENUE ADI. RA00 5078 (14 8134 7/77) JOURNAL NO. 111037 I11! IJ �O CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C a 7 1. DEPARTNENT 01 016A112ATi11 INIT: Accoult coIIIc Planning k 3-FZ Hou 17 147 cel ORiAR12ATII1 5I1-OiJEC1 !. ItpSi161T -bECREASE� INCREASE OIJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEE cusTRA ON 3500 1013 Temporary Salaries 28,460 2100 Office Suaplies 600 -2261 Occupancy Costs 4,930 -2303 Other Travel - Employees 1 ,300 -2310 Professional & Personal Services 39,285 -2473 Specialized Printing 1 ,000 -5022 Cost Applied to Services & Supplies 75,575 0;5�r -2310 Professional & Personal Services 75,575• 4 `x'°10 6301 Reserve for Contingencies 75,575 cl -6301 Appropriable New Revenues 75,575 Revenue Breakdown: 9569 Other Federal Aid, $48,075 9427 State Aid, Planning Surveys, $20,OCO 9660 Planning & Engineering Services, $7,50 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-C NTER Allocation of funds for externally funded projects ey: .� Dot. ll/�t/77 not included in FY 1977-78 budget. All projects are totally funded and are detailed in Board COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR approved agreements listed below: Ai�'� �/=g7 Board Approval By: Date Contracting Agency Amount BOARD OF SUPERVISORS U.S. Bureau of the Census $48,075 Supmisors Berry,Fandcn State Office of Planning & YES: Schroder,Boggess.Hasseltine Research 20,000 United Way of the Bay Area 7,500 No: NOV , ly 9/197 l � j.R. OLSSO�, CL K 4. D r. of Planning 11 /15i 77 •M TYII[ Ting OATS A th y A. Dehaesus By: APPRIPRIATI/R A PA��OSa ob�ic .Gierrez (M 129 Rev. T/T7) L 1 ADJ. JNRRAL I0. r SEE INSTRUCTIONS OR REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 4 LIE►ARTNENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT COOING Planning IRGANiZATION REVENUE 2. REVENUE DESCRIPTION INCREASE <DECREAE� ACCIUNT 0358 9569 Other Federal Aid 48,075 0358 9427 State Aid Planning Surveys 20,000 0,358 9660 Planning & Engineering Services 7,500 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR- ONTROLLER _ .� To increase estimated revenue for externally funded By: Date /-Z 11-7 projects not included in FY 1977-78 budget. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR aY: Date 2/35 977 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: Schroder,Iloggess,Hasselrine / N,V J 77 N0: x r'-7LC- Date V , 1� J.R. OLSSON� CLERK- REVENUE ADJ. RAOO 5080 JOURNAL 00. 00039 (N $134 7/77) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: 2595 ��P ,�� •/ O 51 � / a � o j'a< < h ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. QUANTITY 000 0/,30/ Unappropriated Reserve 5225.00 2595 4955 2 Mobile Radios 3,900 2595 4955 5 EMS Rear Control Units DDz 5 1, 325 0z � 3 o a FTT 00 n -_+m rn r� < MO rr, MC � C z o-+ .y 11 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER n The mobile radios will be placed intim service in By: 7SE4-12� r�G'' Dote ( /2�/7 ambulances in the Orinda Fire District one one owned by Cadillac Ambulance Company. The COUNTY AD INISTRATOR fire rear control units will permit the NOV12,B of five radios from non-emergency By: Date /2,3 1 . ulances to emergency ambulance users. IInder existing ambulance agreement, the costs will be recovered on a lease basis. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supmisors Kenny.FaWen YES: Schroder,Boggess,Hassclrine NO: `-1L"L-L- o OV '16i 197 L A. GLENN, .ADMIN. SERiriCES OFFICER UEFICE OF THE SHERIFF-CG;;Z;4Fq J.R. OLSSAN, CLERK 4. SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By: rJ APPROPRIATWN Q POO 5055( Rcbbie C errez ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 00040 SHERIFF-CORONER COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Inter-Office Memo TO : Les Glenn, Administrative Svcs. Officer DATE : 11-2-77 FROM : Roy H. Kong, Communications Director SUBJECT : Appropriation Adjustment - Ambulance Radios There is a requirement for two ambulance radios to equip Orinda fire and Cadillac Ambulancesimmediateiy as they are ready for service. The cost of these two units is $1 ,950 each. In addition,we need . five each Emergency Medical Service (EMS) rear control units at $265 each to modify the existing five radios from non-emergency ambulances to emergency ambulances users. Request aroropriation adjustment of $5,225 as required. RIIK:ab cc: Q. Eisenman, EMS 00041 1 w:J CONTRA COSTA COUNTY .t. APPROPRIATION A6JUSTMENT v T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODINC 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: Riverview Fire Protection District 0 CANIZATION SUB-OBJECT T. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 7200 4955 Handi-Com MH70 Series Portable Radio 0038 1 $ 900.00 7200 4955 Plectron Alert/Monitor Receiver Model R 720 and same with RSO 0039 20 3,193.00 7200 4955 Mocom 70 Series Radio 0040 4 4,247.00 7200 4955 Minitor/Monitor Radio Alert Receiver 0041 4 888.00 7200 4955 Priority dispatch transmitter, receivers antennas etc. , 0042 1 se 9,890.00 7200 4955 �No position operators console 0043 1 se 30,882.00 7200 4955 Fire Alarm System 0013 1 $50,000.00 7200 4684 Ceiling Insulation 210.00 7200 6301 For Ceiling Insulation 210.00 Co,-,-Ira Costa County RECEIVED SOV i 8 1977 Office of Ccurliy Administrator. 'APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST 4UDITOR=;C To list distribution of items under Fire Alarm System. By: Dafen �/� / To protide for increased cost from Reserve for Contingency account. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR N OV 2� )9T Cost per lowest bidder quotation $910.00 By: Dare 77-78 Appropriation 700.00 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Additional Appropriation $210.00 Supervisors Kerny.1:311 i n YES: Schroder,Boggess,HssWriw No: `7M7C_'e_- NOV 2 9 197 On J R. OLSS�JN Ci �irK _� �rkDL ,/i// � c , CHT[E7Fic C--DATi"E By: — AFPPODP.IAiICN Af 7 P.obbie ierrez ()_042 ADj. AUFIAL NO. !N 129 Pev 7/77) SEE fPiS'RJCI ICV! CN REVERSE SIDE - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C t 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OA OICANItATI81 OBIT: '�2 ^ _1_ '�tJN ICt ��vvr t ORUNIZAT11N 501-0IJECT !. FIRED ASSET <,tECREASC INCREASE OIJECT OF EIPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM /t. OWNtlii — 0215 1013 TEMPORARY SALARIES -0215-1013 3;389 rsoo 0215 1011 PERMANENT SALARIES -0215-1011r§88- 3,Sdc: = z� o Ir U J a J �Z LU 00 U c.p ¢ As O O U O G APPROVED ;. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CON LLER n Replenish budget depletion resulting from Date �! /.'+ /'? necessity of employing temporary help due E±r: to unfilled permanent positions. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Also three permanent employees are scheduled �"� NOV 2 1�77 to be on vacation during the months of November By` and December of 1977. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kcnm.2'ah:irn YES: &hruder,Duggess,Hasseitine NO: NOV r 9i 197 J.R. OLSS/", CLER 4. V Clerk-Admin. lir SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By: A►►II►IIAiIIN A POOJO$2. Robbie Gi? a rez ADJ. ANRNAL I1. (M 129 Rev. 7/77) 9EE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE 310E 00043 CONTRA -9STA, COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ' I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: County Administrator ACCOUNT CODING Public Works (Bldgs. & Grounds ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET -QECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. QUANTITY PLANT ACQUISITION DETENTION FACILITIES 4411 4206 Replace Heaters - Rehab. Center $2,480 4411 4a6g Improve Lighting - Rehab. Center 5 , 800 4411 4zL-9 Install Flooring - Rehab. Center 1,500 4411 4-27D Insulate Barracks - Rehab. Center 5, 900 4411 4206 Barracks Remodel $15, 680 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST AUDITOR-CO LLER Reallocate Marsh Creek Rehabilitation Center By: —Date I I AU177 remodel funds to individual jobs as appropriated in the Proposed Budget for COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR fiscal year 1977-1978. By: Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisor,Benny.Fanden YES: S �r��er,lloggess,Hawkine NO: q NOV/� y 197 Asst. County J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4. Admin. -Finance ll/U 77 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By: c_ r"; APPROPRIATION A POO 50il p 10 �sr; C2 ADJ. JOURNAL N0. (M 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 010041 ~ CONTRA COSTA.COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 17 ACCOUNT CODINC 1. DEPAITNENT 01 016ANIZAT101 IN!T: PROBATION ;;3060 ORIANIZAT111 SIB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASEJ INCREASE 11JECT OF EXPENSE ON FIIED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 3060 4951 Type�:riters, Electric 0002 860 3060 4951 Monroe Calculator, Model 1405 0007 1 230 3060 2100 Office Expense logo 0 rn n n s — rn o> < m APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTR ER Item #1 - To increase fixed asset appropriation in an :1replacement amount necessary for the purchase of six (.6) Ely: \ Data typewriters per Auditor-Controller COUNTY ADM NISTRATOR Budget Division. NOV 2 y77 Item #2 - To establish a fixed asset account for the By: Date purchase of a Monroe Calculator as a replacement BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of a Victor Multiplier, County Tag #67702 in the Probation Accounting Section. YES: 5chru cc,Eiucss,Hasscl�ine See attached memo regarding repairs and age of NO: the Victor Multiplier. fav J.R. OLSSPN, CLERK—" Q - r ASST.000NTY P.Q. 11 /17/ 77 �• •1[MATY11[ �/ TITLE RATE ey: APPRIPRIATIIR A_POO,i 0, :� ADJ. JIIRIAL 10. ��n +�- (Id 129 Nov. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS 00 REVERSE SID[ )0045,45, s ` MICCO OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 2340 PACHECO BOULEVARD- MARTINEZ.CALIFORNIA 94553 MARTINEZ (415) 228.7700- VALLEJO(707) 643.0700 i j r,• � iI ;� C 1 Probation Dept. ' Accounting Office NOV.14 Stanwell Dr. Concord P,,,(,iA ON ACCOUNTING c,01'4,R,'k C..S A CO., CALIF. ToWhom It May Concern: Regarding the Victor Multiplier that was brought to our shop for repair,serial number 9246817,county tag number 67702. This machine has a broken side frame rivet and is not economically repairable. The cost for such a job, due to the amount of parts that have to be replaced is not in line with the overall worth of the machine. Approximate age of the machine is 10 years. Trade in value is nil. Sincerly, Terry hove Service Manager 00045 Q • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY // APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Final 1976-77 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT permanent Salaries Adjustment RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Code Quantity) BudaetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 001-1011 446 002 4,792 003 15,173 004 8,576 010 2,786 011 26,953 015 1,316 016 47,368 020 1,665 . i 030 5,255 035 7,992 043770 055 4,252 r 058 311 060 18,753 061 9,629 062 4,461 j 074 110,633 075 3,217 076 1,708 079 89,558 145 3,181 148 2,561 149 2,016- 180 ,016180 1 15,579 200 [ 545 210 1 16,455 211 /� 1,126 i 214 ! 1,340 ■� . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT � 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITF—M ` Increase Fund Decrease - Code O+uantit ) BudaetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 215-1011 26 235 18,468 237 6 240 13,004 242 982 243 24,719 245 29,918 246 327 247 16,451 255 33,842 256 28,944 257 2,990 260 10,582 261 4,598 264 12,572 265 2,173 300 73,982 1120 303 5,353 1003 308 102,412 310 6 313 — 19,199 314 41,692 316 422 318 6 1120 320 24,685 1120 321 � 2,587 \ 1003 324 0414'J 28,028 327 13,352 S 335 20,601 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Dec-case Increase Find Code Quantity)— BudactUne!Object Sub.acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 3340-1011 11,378 355 6,464 357 3,579 359 796 362 525 364 229 365 653 366 16,715 450 132,487 460 21,398 472 1,418 475 232 500 2,767 501 237,037 502 495,367 503 18,179 504 , 22,641 505 1,792 506 13,839 508 28,075 509 67,583 540 47,629 570 20,582 C 579 3,492 I r S81 550,635 i 582 15,410 583 1/ 589 "`)(14"�� 11,830 17,159 (�l 591 6,929 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DaJEC T OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Code Quontit ) BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct, CR X IN 66) 01 1003 592-1011 1,079 602 80 1206 620 17,089 1003 630 442 C 650 15,069 654 48 659 966 01 1003 990-9970 .E'ese'�ve ,- Lonfi rtf�geic+s �e�lf�a/ �uro� 1,848,317 1120 994 ( ea;i, Stial., 21,919 ` 1206 991 ) 216ra,-y 17,089 PROOF _Comp._ _ _K.P. _VER. s. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations countywide Date Description to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Permanent Salaries Perm Sal Adj and place the balance in the reserve for contingencies. Increases and/or decreases to project cost centers and other reimbursed cost centers reflect a corresponding increase or decrease to revenue depending on their. indi- APPROVED: SIGN 4kES DATE vidual ratio of reimbursement. AUDITOR— ' CONTROLLER: ' v ` 197 COUNTY NOV 2 1977 ADMINISTRATOR: S BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES- Scp: isms Kcrnv.r-_Mcn Sc rc�'.c:.&��Gc�s,Hassdrane No:.�, �. on 00050 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b j\ - ° a. • �� C Asst. Budget AnalystNOV 2 2 1977 Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. �7 U (M 129 REV. 2/75) L Journal No. Crr Instructions uu Reverse Side • • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE FL*1 Adjustmeit Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ` Increase Code Quantic l BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) M 01 1003 001 1044 653 002 308 003 1,511 004 725 010 541 011 3,570 015 15 016 5,395 020 - 123 030 798 035 588 04: 2.56 OSS 321 058 105 060 1,620 061 824 062 853 074 9,918 075 477 076 2,110 079 9,012 145 211 148 220 149 (i/�fl� 113 180 1,216 200 572 210 6,582 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Code 'Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 211 1044 523 i 214 ! 1,242 215 3,444 235 4,233 237 2 240 2 2,317 242 277 243 3,671 245 2,804 246 34 247 1,929 255 9,313 256 3_,690 257 1,982 260 1,669 261 74 264 2,134 265 1,443 300 17,653 1120 303 i 2,071 1003 308 10,212 310 11 313 j 3,741 3"14 3,731 316 829 318 0101n:52 111 1120 320 2,337 1120 321 839 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantic } BudaetUnir Ob'ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 65j 01 1003 324 1044 1,084 327 1,694 335 1,953 340 1,192 355 823 357 398 359 1,339 3362 67 364 24 365 43 366 1,567 450 17,545 460 2,544 472 516 475 874 S00 285 501 37,463 502 43,861 503 1 833 504 1,918 505 203 506 1,115 508 2,839 509 6,327 540 13,173 570 II1` 709 579 `/! 644 581 48,225 582 1,078 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease , Codc Quantity) Budoct Unit 06iect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 583 1044 2,597 589 2,120 591 765 592 863 1206 620 2,157 1003 630 47 I 650 2,272 654 15 659 574 OI 1 1003 990-9970 ' J ' 242 411 1120 994-9970 1,105 1206 991-9970 ,Ci6iary 2,157 PROOF _Comp. VEP.. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TIN TOTAL To adjust individual cost center appropriations county- ENTRY wide to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Retirement Date Description expense, and place the balance in the reserve for con- tingencies. Increases and/or decreases to project cost -Ret: Cnntr centers and other reimbursed cost centers reflect a Adj. corresponding increase or decrease to revenue depending on their individual ratio of reimbursement. APPROVED: SIGNATLLP S DATE AUDITOR— /� 197 . V,;L�C"�6w CONTROLLER: �f ADA ISTRATOR: NOy G CJ7 7 I r BOARD PF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES upen•aars Kenn..' Sihti.err,14,:;tess•Heseltine ��`����.� NOV 19 1977 No:. -977 Cf) J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b �, r' v�C � Assistant Budget Analyst RO I Ctd'Crre/z Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. 7�� (�M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. See 1nstructious on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE FICA Expense Adjustment Card Special ACCOUNT 1. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrease Increase Code Qu on tit ) Fund BudvetUnit Object Sub.A:ct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 001-1042 41 002 219 003 327 004 1,637 010 1,428 011 5,174 015 166 016 2,213 020 8 030 635 035 585 043 164 044 2SO 046 355 055 47 i 058 18 060 920 061 770 062 S55 074 1 7,007 075 575 076 900 079 8,936 145 } 283 14821 /n��` 149 ( 00110JI 55 180 � 620 1 200 80 j { 210 2,725 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT L DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED'ASSETITEM' Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantit ) Bud et Unit Ob'ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 211-1042 392 214378 215 1,600 235 1,200 237 8 240 1,560 242 2,797 243 2,150 245 1,514 246 37 247 435 255 2,125 256 1,677 257 237 260 207 261 6 C 264 52 265 73 300 766 1120 303 13 1003 308 4,610 + 310 24 1 313 1,011 314 4,579 316 1,605 318 1120 320 f ZT1 M 1,254 1120 321 / 1,454 1003 324 t 597 iCONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION- ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Decrease Increase Code 'Quantity) Budoet Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 327-1042 1,389 335 1,745 340 616 355 633 357 1,286 359 631 362 41 364 9 36S 330 366 1,436 450 19,640 460 1,800 472 134 475 259 S00 74 501 23,244 502 30,093 503 2,345 504 1,581 505 74 S06 143 508 2,234 509 4,193 540 41,882 570 1,101 579 1lf) f 250 581 29,890 582 857 583 777 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED Decrease ASSET ITEM ' Increase Code Quantity) PrdoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 589-1042 2,743 591 406 592 561 602 41 1 f06 620 1,991 t 1003 630 2 650 3,350 654 7 659 8,898 01 1003 990-9970 F'csc�v� �. Co��i.fJerc�iPs ��Pr2/ ����/ 216,968 1120 994 / .Pev S � 2,695 S 1206 991 � � ,[,��y 1,991 r PROOF _Comp._ _ K.P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations countywide Date Description to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Social Security contributions, and place the balance in the reserve for FICA Exp Adj contingencies. Increases and/or decreases to project cost centers and other reimbursed cost centers reflect a corresponding increase or decrease to revenue depending on their APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE individual ratio of reimbursement. CONTROLLER- V 2 2 197 COUNTY N017 2 1J 1 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Sup crvisn.s?germ:,F.ihdc:t ticnnJ<--- iiu�,�;c,,.lf:uscttiuc NOV 927� 00055 N0% 7Ze—;L �an J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b- /'� � CxLo Asst. Budget Analyst NOV 2 2 1977 Signature Title Dete Approp Adj. � ')(� (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. J�'7 Yee /nstrtrcllorrs ou Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Health Insurance Adjustment Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Fund Decrease Code :Quantity) BudaetUnit Ob"ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 001 1060 226 002 654 ' 003 518 004 647 010 1,172 I011 1,054 015 30 016 4,437 020 8 030 15 035 1,697 043 22 055 1,620 058 133 050 '' 694 061 i 212 062 214 074 2,813 075 5 076 1,287 079 ' 1.321 145 424 148 240 149 i 68 180 1200 )1�(35� 1,375 69 210 383 f 211 } 1,149 i 214 878 , • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. OEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Code Quantity) BudaetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 215 1060 1,790 j 235 519 i 237 1 1 240 444 242 6,167 243 561 245 3,849 246 8 247 799 255 548 256 1,263 257 788 260 962 261 549 I 264 646 { ; 265 173 300 1,854 1120 303 9 1003 308 122 310 19 1 .3 404 314 2,866 316 1,678 318 7 1120 32044�r 44 1120 321 i 01�'rU0 244 1003 324 793 327 505 335 606' iCONTRA COSTA COUNTY . APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Code Quantit ) kud.etUnit Ob'ect ISub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 340 106 69 355 1,398 357 157 359 153 362 110 364 45 365 46 366 1,161 450 3,295 460 86 472 769 475 220 500 611 501 22,769 ' 502 14,206 i 503 450 504 3,004 i 505 9 i 506 1,187 ! 508 676 (, 509 3,857 540 10,879 570 475 579 414 5581 82 ��s� 27,180 !�V 148 583 559 589 ; 7,651 591 975 592 798 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Speciol ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN i56) 01 1206 620-1060 2,945 1003 =630 20 650 1,042 ( 654 7 659 60 0 1003 990-9970 ,�''',csc Ve- 711V1 �,R�`/•cgGstGlEJ3 t�2s=E.�z f to tc/ 119,186 .1220 994-9970 / leer S,(ar. 297 1206 991-9970 2,945 PROOF _Comp.TP. _ _VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each} TOTAL To adjust individual cost center appropriations county- ENTRY wide to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Health Insurance Date Description and place the balance in the reserve for contingencies. Increases and/or decreases to project cost centers and Hlth. Ins. Adjl. other reimbursed cost centers reflect a corresponding increase or decrease to revenue depending on their individual ratio of reimbursement. APPROVED: SI RES DATE AUDITOR tom, 2 2', 197 CONTROLLER: v°Y �j COUNTY Y111k� NOV ) u ADMINISTRATOR. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: &;PC-%•1s0rsh:..r.:.:,r.,:; �1�� ��v Staun'.cr,hct gr;,,Hassr)tine lj( ,6 10 NO:. �d -- onNV 21X97 NOV 2 ? 1977 Assistant Budget Analyst J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by Y• -- f Q��biy� tin.rr?Z Signature Title / Date o rnaNoAdj. -,,Journal ,,f urnal No. r {M 129 REV. 2/75} • arc l,rstrrrctirws on Ret erre Side I • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Employee Life Insu a Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET iTE?A ' Increase Fund Decrease Codc Quontit ) BudactUnit Ob'ect Sub.Acct.. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 001 1062 26 002 14 003 337 004 45 010 36 011 - - 202 015 26 016 263 020 1- 030 41 035 371 043 14 055 40 058 26 060 12 061 6 062 92 074 129 075 87 076 14 079 174 145 12 148 1 149 1 180 180 200 4 12 n ` 2110 l/��`16 64 214 12 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Decrease Increase Cod C3uantit ) Fund BudactUnit Ob ect Sjb.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 215 1062 1 235 1 101 237 46 240 26 242 76 243 187 245 27 255 6 256 1 260 1 261 2 264 1 265 1 300 35 308 450 313 63 314 136 316 131 1120 320 3 1120 321 105 1003 324 12 335 273 340 32 355 1 357 330 359 �► 1 362 00 �6, 12 26 364 49 • 365 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1, DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUOITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. 013JECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Decrease Increase Fund Code Quantity) BuductUnit Obiect Sub.Accs. f CR X IN 66) 01 1003 450 1062 371 460 35 472 14 475 1 501 11,645 502 816 503 137 504 93 505 120 506 116 508 so 509 364 540 766 570 26 579 12 581 575 582 - 72 583 46 589 250 592 68 1206 620 116 1003 650 254 659 98 990-9970 l(leselee 8t375 1120 994-9970ee,SA?1- S 108 1206 991-9970 116 PROD P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations county- Date Description wide to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Life Insurance, and place the balance in the reserve for contingencies. Emp. Life Insurance Increases and/or decreases to project cost centers and other Adjustment reimbursed cost centers reflect a corresponding increase or decrease to revenue depending on their individual ratio of reimbursement. APPROVED: SIGNFNRES DATE AUDITOR— DATE 1 V 97, CONTROLLER- mV 2 2 197, COUNTY OV cl Nov ADMINISTRATOR: - 3 1977 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES- SuPt-isors k-czlnv.1:3hden S:hr-u-It:r.boggtw.Hasscltine 0006i N DAI �7 Journal Na. NO:. '�ec Instruclions wi Ret erse Side NOV 2 2 19771 J. R. OLSSM, CLERK by Assist. Budget Analyst R:-"o G01*-errez Signature Title Date .4pprop.Adj. J7�1/ ,32 (M 129 REV. 2/75) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I- DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE F UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Labor Provided/Received Adjustment Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudoctUnit Ob act Sub.Acct. Decrease CR X IN 66) 01 1003 004-1081 4,313 010-1082 100 016-1081 1,021 043-1082 107 044-1081 1,586 046-1081 2,500 060-1081 1,296 061-1081 4,488 061-1082 1,681 062-1081 2,707 074-1081 516 075-1081 12 076-1081 1,104 079-1082 43800 180-1082 147 215-1082 192 242-1082 18,641 243-10S2 3,320 246-1081 4,850 257-1081 1,SO4 307-1051 4,455 308-1081 10,536 308-1082 4,877 310-1081 48 313-1081 10,082 313-1082 681 01) 1� 9,500 314-1081 314-1082 4,318 a = 1 - - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1, DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Page Z Card Speciol Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Code Quantity) BudaerUnit Ob ecc Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 318-1081 460 324-1082 3,917 327-1081 222 327-1082 130 335-1081 192 365-1082 256 366-1081 156 450-1081 3,510 450-1082 112,780 451-1081 41,946 451-1082 8,843 460-1081 96,000 472-1081 33849 472-,1082 972 501-1082 50,193 502-1081 1,936 502-1082 505 503-1082 8,005 504-1081 505 505-1081 5,821 505-1082 6?117 506-1081 12,110 508-1082 11079 509-1082 7,047 540-1081 54,079 570-1081 00016 1 3,030 583-1081 9,599- 583-1082 4,000 589-1081 476 9,811 • ' ' • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Page 3 Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantity). Budoet Unit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 650-1082 31,142 654-1081 475 659-1082 11,989 01 1120 320-1081 1,114 321-1081 1,453 320-1082 541 321-1082 1,000 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies General Func 1,026 1120 994-9970 Reserve for Contingencies Rev Shar FLud 1,026 PROOF _Comp._ _ K-P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each TOTAL To adjust individual cost center appropriations countywide ENTRY t0 reflect final 1976-77 charges for Labor Provided and Date Description Labor Received. Labor Prov/Rec Adj APPROVED: SIGN RES dDATE AUDI TOR- \An ER: V CONTROLL COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. 7 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Surea•i�or Kcnnr,Fah,en t197J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b " \ '1 ..Asst, Budget Analys Uy 2 2 197 Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. �-. 13 3 (M 129 REV. 2/75) ` Journal No. ee Instructions un Ret erse Side CCONTRA COSTA COUNTY % APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Occupancy Costs—Rented Buildings Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Incrccse Code Ouontit ) Fund Budoet Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN W 01 1003 001 2261 3,261 004 3,899 010 •2,039 011 5,801 016 518 020 4,332 030 2,074 035 3,689 043 4,160 044 6,507 058 32 075 156 079 3,099 081 194 148 8,120 149 2,494 210 2,568 211 6,647 214 7,985 215 4,660 235 313 240 2,333 242 9,802 243 44,479 245 24,981 247 255 00069 2,J6I 5,835 257 763 260 343 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY �,rt APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Decrease Increcse Code Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. _LaLIN IN 66) 01 1003 261 2261 1,854 264 2,009 308 310 2,192 27 316 7,902 324 20,354 335 348 355 3,959 362 621 364 455 450 23,899 451 42,850 472 584 500 3,345 501 1,555 S02 6,748 503 16,815 504 622 505 378 506 2,427 508 2,907 509 6,694 540 6,036 579 663 583 10,215 589 21,026 630 3,905 071 8822 179,338 990 9970 Reserve for Contingencies Gen Fund 637 PROOF Comp._ -K_P_ q 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - -ENTRY To adjust various cost centers to reflect final 1976-77 Date Description charges for Occupancy Costs-Rented Buildings, and return the balance to the reserve for contingencies. OC_ C'�;JQtfCy OSS Ads APPROVED: SIGN RESI AUDITOR- CONTROLLER: Y COUNTY ADI.IINISTRATOR:BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES• $¢rcrci-ars icr, Fa!:3cnS6: dc:.B a.Hassc: Pd D'd q 1077 0 i 070 No:. on f NOV 2 2 1977 J. R. OL SSAV, CLERK a, Assist. Budget Analyst r !7h', Gutierrez Signature I Title Dot• t1 ` ournol Not (M 129 REV. 2/75) ti ec Instructions ou Reverse Side . 5� • _ � , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-7Z RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Occupancy Costs-Co-Owned Buildings Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantic ) BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 004 2262 1,702 362 160 451 8,647 501 3,712 502 83 503 1,907 508 4,194 540 18,573 592 300 070 8822 14,635 990 9970 Reserve for Contingencies Gen. Fund 4,655 PROOF _Comp._ _ K.P. _ VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust various cost centers to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Occupancy Costs - County Owned Dare Description Buildings, and return the balance to the reserve for wee i r1Cv Ccj contingencies. Ask APPROVED: SIG RES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: - UDITOR—CONTROLLER: +� ^� 1977 COUNTY ��0 V 9 1.-17 7 ADMINISTRATOR: ` BOARDSOF SUPERVISORS ORDER: upen•uors Kenn%. YES: Schroder.I3u&irss,Hssseieine D +n 7 NO% o�0v rNov 2 1977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by �• c - _ � Assist. Budeet Analyst ;ta'.i pit}tprrr!7 , Signature Title -7 Date o Ado. J55L3 W 129 REV. 2/75) ournana l No. / ` See Instructions On Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Final 1976-77 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Telephone Exchange Service RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CON TROLL-ER'S USE Card Special /ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrease Increase Fund CR X IN 66) Code Quantity) BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. 01 1003 001-2111 844 002- 365 003- 57 004- 33,799 010- 1,473 011- 944 015- 1,070 016- 1,412 020- 162 030- 32 035- 3,104 043- 747 044- 260 055- 101 058_ 300 059- 712 061- 541 062- 324 074- 666 075- 318 076- 308 079- 2,807 145- 426 148- I98 149- 23 180- nn 2,432 200- 4) � `12 326 210- 2,389 711- 269 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Page 2 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card -pecial ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSE- Fund ITEM ' Decrease Increase Code Quantity) BudaetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 10033 237-2111 66 238- 8 240- 1,655 242- 1,295 243- 4,212 245- 10,015 247- 3,591 255- 7,768 256- 1,587 257- 483 260- 17 261- 95 265- 2 300- 4,346 307- 100 308- 4,089 314- 2,688 324- 382 { 33S- 1,991 340- 605 I 355- 718 357- 120 359- 485 i 362- 417 i 364- 35 365- 105 366- t� 450- 010011 571 982 500- 1 1,281 882 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Page 3 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) Fund BudaetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 501-2111 22,906 502- 42,106 503- 495 505- 543 506- 5,368 507- 2,129 508- 1,530 509- 3,343 540- 15,522 570- 1,155 579- 287 581- 82 582- 1,010 583- 384 589- 5,116 592- 758 630- 693 650- 2,099 654- 1,129 1120 303-2111 3 320- 448 321- I 582 994-9970 Reserve for Contingencies Rev. Shar. Fund 143 1206 620-2111 991-9970 Reserve for Contingencies Library Fund 98 • 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE page 4 Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Code Quantity) Bud et Unit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 060-2100 11 -2110 37x994 -2301 429 I -2473 783 ( -8822 83?244 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies General Fund 467021 9)31 PROOF _Comp._ _ -K.P` 7VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of eoch) TOTAL To adjust individual cost center appropriations countywide ENTRY to reflect final 1976-77 charges for telephone exchange Dote Description se-.-vices. Tel Exch Svc Adj To adjust cost center 060, telephone exchange service, to reflect its status as fu..ly cos: applied, and return the balance to the reserve for contingencies. Increases and/or decreases to project cost centers and other reimbursed cost centers reflect a corresponding increase or decrease APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE to revenue depending on their individual ratio of reimbursement. AUDITOR CONTROLLER: V 2 2' 1977 COUNTY 1'.4 ' OV 2 1977 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARDSOF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: apenv:so Kenny.F ah.:rn 5<hruirr,130'esess,Hasseltine 1 J! `•F75 onl�i Li V-.;-"� l�7 NOV 2 2 197' P,obb -U Ierrez J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by - I, Asst. Budget Analyst Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. W 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. o� Seg' Instructions on Reverse Side c CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT �g76_7Z RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Data ProcessinjZ Services Adjustment Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 667 01 1003 002 2315 8 003 228 010 66,793 015 6,867 016 20,384 035 6,264 043 429 044 1,019 046 1,936 058 62 063 65 145 2,169 149 85 189 521 210 233 211 7,241 212 3,517 213 4,211 214 226 215 203 235 13,332 23"7 1,072 240 701 242 74 245 257 255 173 308 0007!'f 133 355 804 357 140 j • ^ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEFd ' Decrease Increase Code Quantic ) BudaetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 366 2315 761 450 3,140 503 750 509 I 3,7-77 540 7,461 583 2,477 650 1,034 l 1206 620 2315 396 991 9970 Reserve for Contingencies Library Fund 396_ II 1003 011 1013 2,031 1014 2,655 2310 32,056 2477 3,669 8822 87,689 012 2310 85,130 1 8822 83,930 990 9970 Reserve for Contingencies General Fund 44,617 PROOF _Comp._ _K_P_ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items dnd cost of each TOTAL ENTRY Description To adjust individual cost center appropriations county- wide to reflect final 1976-77 charges for Data Processing Data Processing Svc. Services. To adjust cost centers 011 and 012 General Fund to reflect their status as fully cost applied and Adjustment return the balance to the Reserve for Contingencies. APPROVED: SIGN ES DATE AUDITOR— _ CONTROLLER: jOV �' 1 !977 COUNTY �},o] ADMINISTRATOR: uV 077 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supm-isors Denny.Fanden S,inwer.Boggrss,Hasseltine `7L � NOV 197 on l' �i NOV 2 2 1977 J. OLSSON, CLERK byl=/' � '� Assist. Budget Analyst r -t,;.,� . , Si nature I " �I— . fi t' rr.� 9 Title Q Dafe Approp.Adj. �' 3l (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. See InslrnclMns on Reverse Side r • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Microfilm Service Adjustment Card Special ACCOUNT _. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Increase Fund Decrease r Code Quantit ) BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 004-2324 25 010 1,737 011 1,201 015 102 016 1,165 030 " 263 035 14 043 18 149 58 189 1,249 215 _ - 2,000 240 4 245 49 247 164 255 - 199 308 767 340 968 355 535 357 .172 450 153 460 155 501 388 502 217 504 94 506 89 508 3251�[�F,f� 509 374 540 650 9,871 158 • 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) BudaetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct_ CR X IN 66) 01 1003 148-1013 2,918 S < 2310 13,989 J 8822 13,686 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies-General Funl 14,229 01 1206 620-2324 1,000 s 5 991-9970 Reserve for Contingencies-Library Funi 1,000 PROOF _Comp._ +K.P. _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations Date Description countywide to reflect final 1976-77 charges for microfilm services. Microfilm Svc. Adj , To adjust cost center 148, Microfilm Service, to reflect its status as fully cost applied, and return the balance to the reserve for contingencies. APPROVED: SIGNA RES DATE AUDITOR— e CONTROLLER: V 2 92 197 COUNTY c � IOU 'P ��� ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES. Sapen'isurs ,coo 1: %, 'j..n Schrce cr,Eck ss.H.uselciae NO:, '' �I t�''f 2 �LtS 1 '� o.. _ 1 4i�c Asst. Budget AnalystNOV 2 2 1977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by 1. - R:.'`! . Gutierrez Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. v Cee Instructions on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Administrative Services Adjustment Card Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Code Quantic ) BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 450-4400 Admin Svcs Adj 8,348 509 57,645 540 25,258 180-8824 Cost Applied Overhead 26,039 190 t 4 S 2,000 PROOF _Comp.— _ _K_P_ _ _VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations to Date Description reflect final 1976-77 charges for Administrative �! ff services from the Human Resources Agency. APPROVED: 51GNA RES DATE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: C- �f ? �97 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Suprc:sors K nnr.Fah icn :�:'r:j-:cr.Bc:�;c5s.Ei:sseititu !l`�1►f {, NOV `? Q 197. !fit r�Jv1��vf NOV 2 .. 1977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by s. r Assistant Budget Analyst RobI@ Gutierrez Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. W 129 REV. 2/75? Journal No. ' .Seep fnstrrn-liriu5 on Reverse Side — CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-1977 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Employee Benefits & Insurance Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Fund Decrease Code 4,iamit f Bud et Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 61 1003 146-1042 Emp Benefits Adj 343,34 -1044 I 487,198 -1060 214,021 -1061 55x503 -1062 12,962 -1090 1,591 -8821 1,077,546 -8890 11891 1006 -1042 7,920 -1044 15,117 -1060 8,S75 -1061 2,490 -1062 238 -8821 34,340 1120 -1042 28,221 -1044 96,475 -1060 29,613 -1062 1x098 -SS21 155,407 1206 -1042 137,259 -1044 225,270 -1060 124,845 -1061 191006 -1062 3,264 -1090 9 -8821 509,644 -8890 9 1401 -1042 !l�){� 1 4,332 - 1044 9,623 inn2-710 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM" Increase Fund Decrease Code 'Quantity) BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1401 146-,1061 Emp Benfits Adj 214 I -1062 I I 199 r8821 17,078 01 10i 3 150-2361 Insurance Adj 62,321 -8822 204,922 1006 -2361 2,487 .-8822 2,487 1206 -2361 12,090 -8822 12,090 1401 -2361 4,961 -8822 4,961 1120 -2361 48,236 1120 994-9970 Reserve for Contingencies Rev. 48,236 Sharing Fund 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies General 178,083 Fund PROOF _Comp._ _ _K_P_ _VEP,. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each TOTAL - ENTRY To adjust the Employee Benefits (146) and Insurance (150) Date Description Cost Centers to reflect final 1976-77 expenditures, and place the balance in the reserve for contingencies. As Above APPROVED: SIGNA DATE AUDITOR- _ r Ov � N .197 CONTROLLER: a COUNTY NOV J 1,`377ADMINISTRATOR- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES Supcnisors n ^r..,Fand;n Eoggess.H.useltine 00082`�00 8/f+ n No:. NOV V ? 9 1977 � . ( DAsst. Budget Analyst NOV 2 2 1977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by � �. - , Robb I Gutierre Signature Title Dote Approp.Adj. �7 31� (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. / t- Vee frtslrvrcilrius Ull Reverse Side . . ^ � \ cVwTnA COSTA roVwTY \. xpPnopnxnON Ao]uSruE*T ^ l • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT L CEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg_ 2 Ccid Special ACCOUNT 2. DBJEC'+ OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' I ncrease Fund Decr Code ^, emit ) BudoetUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. X IN 66) 01 1003 077-2310 -3530 163 180-2250 2,045 -2270 478 -2310 470 -8822 2,993 149-8822 2,549 189-2100 2,549 200-1013 211484 -2351 2,484 256-7751 001 144 j -7752 0033 144 264-2477 21 1 -7751 001 21 308-2301 3,665 l -3310 3,665 314-2283 4,535 -3530 30S -8822 4,230 1120 320-1013 8,390 -2281 4,596 -2282 4,190 -3310 396 321-2310 75 -3530 75 ICCU3 357-2479 17 f —3530 !'1 17 362-2479 zf1 127 —3530 127 `. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DCP:RTRICN! OR LUDGE! UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'dUSE Pg. 3 Ccrd Special ACCOUNT2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrecse Increase Code O.rcntit ) Fund Budret Unit Ob'ecCR X IN 66) 01 1003 366-1014 --2120 295 451-7752 707 49 -7754 005 79 010 30 500-2303 1,114 501-2110 47,478 -2301 31,314 -3317 5,409. 502-3550 478 504-2301 1,708 506-8822 51,150 507-2300 17,184 -3317 18,484 509-2302 20,233 514-3312 28 516-2490 50,287 518-3312 28 518-3590 50,287 540-1013 67,604 -2310 33,833 -3530 3,096 -3550 3,340 -7754 195 127 -7754 786 48 -7758 190 18 -7754 196 � , 193 540-8822 27,335 570-1013 3,946 -2310 4,071 _ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. D[P:.RTt.tENl OR BUDGE t UNIT p RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 4 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Decrease Increase Code 10ionfily) Fund Budget Unit Object Sub.Accr. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 570-3530 125 1589-2310 589-2310 1,997 I 1 -3317 1,997 1206 620-3530 212 -8822 1,957 -2270 1,160 -2281 1,009 1003 650-7751 732 371 -7754 015 12 -7751 003 383 730-2283 110 f -3530 110 582-7752 003 11 1 -7752 004 11 086-7710 621 547 -7710 690 576 -7712 603 29 097-7710 606 339 -7711 603 50 608 389 1 118-7710- 603 346 1 701 346 01 1120 086-7710 620 883 097-7710 709 383 303-1013 ^��r�8s 11023 -2170 !) 4 11,965 -7750 001 612 1 r 002 320 2 nn3 705 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. D11PAR1b1ENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AU DITOR•CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 5 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. D©JECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code 0uantit ) Fund QudaetUnit Ob"ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1120 303-7750 005 610 006 34 1 008 240 2 009 700 1 -7751 014 265 015 68 016 51 1 017 269 -7752 011 565 012 386 -7754 017 2,600 330-2319 2,617 472-2310 370 572-3310 12,220 01 1003 010-1013 283 -1014 382 -2270 1,161 -23"02 238 -24733 2,000 -8822 17,223 t -8829 1,325 020-1013 418 -1014 274 -2100 1,087 046-1013 1,429 -2310 Of)os � 1,898 ' I -8822 30,000 ` 058-2100 116 I ! -2301 147 ...v._�__e-�, 1ST C.�-�..r«� ..ice--.�.�•3 y-.�--_.�...4:^�"' .. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. COPA R NME:T GP BUDGE f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 6 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• 1-c-cse Code Quantity) Fund BudoctUnit Ob'ect Sub.Acct. Deucasc CR X IN 66) 01 1003 058-2303 263 1 -2102 50 074-1014 103 -2170 4,191 -2310 640 1 -7750 001 240 -8822 226,273 075-1013 3,774 -1014 157 -1090 67 -2170 670 -7754 005 207 -8822 74,610 -8827 134 06-1013 262 - -1014 2,869 -2281 154 -2302 3,483 -8822 10,351 079-1013 16,167 -1014 1,656 -2100 1,661 -2270 1,704 -2283 4,803 -2302 7,615 2 -7752 014 �,_, 700 ���`� S 1 -7754 001 MONS 203 -8822 90,364 f -8827 261,789 - �- - -_ --_._._=�L__ _. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. bLPAR N-1EN I OR IjUUGi;( UNIT RESERVED FOR AUUITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 7 Cerd Special ACCOUNT 2- OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Cecreese Inc"ccse Code oicntityl Fund Budco Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) O1 1003 081-2283 3,082 j 135-2471 915 190-8822 251752 211-1013 3,500 -1014 141 -2100 4,804 -2102 1,697 -2250 1,056 -2310 5,457 -2351 4,560 -2303 246 -8822 118 212-2102 13 1 -2310 10 213-2102 260 240-1013 3,546 -1014 4,542 -2310 . 12,227 -7751 001 646 1 -7752 007 250 -8822 5,950 242-2302 1,369 -2350 4,038 -3550 100 -7752 007 30 -8822f, 1,096 (]/��A� -1013 0 i 9 2,561 -1014 314 255-1013 12,836 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTIMCNT DEPART,1,',ENr0R01?0GH UNIT RESERVED rFOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE IN T P 8 Card �pcciaf ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Code L t Y) De -..IB3udgetUnit Object Sub.Acct. crease Fund 5_1 1093 :" CR X IN 66) 01 1003 255-10H4 5, 2310 8,127 -2477 5,459 3550 261 -8822 31274 -7750 004 240 -7751 Oil 165 -7751 019 946 -7752 013 260 -7752 ols 6- 260-1013 342 -2479 27 -3550 63 214-1013 141 -2302 65 300-1013 9,358 -1014 8,081 -2150 5,621 -2310 56,015 -3550 428 2 -7750 001 370 -7750 003 184 -7753 004 2,300 -7754 002 20 -8822 11,008 -88293,074 312-3310 81917 313-1013 00090 14,497 2283 1,668 3530 r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY t APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. CCI'ARTMENT OR !)UUGF f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 9 Card Special ACCOUNT �2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Code Qjvntit ) BudaetUnit Ob'ect Sub.Acct. t rCR X PJ 66) 01 1003 320-1013 438 j 321-1013 679 i 340-1013 812 -1014 118 -2100 3,130 -7751 002 119 1 005 101 -7752 004 230 -8822 6,924 355-1013 2,512 -1014 72 -2100 3,928 -7751 001 38 -8822 870 356-2310 8,114 359-1013 S00 i -1014 3,324 -2302 1,362 -3550 64 3 0-2310 7,753 450-1013 20,425 -1014 3,232 I -2479 121 -2490 9,855 -3580 8,447 1 -7750 001 220 002 00091 5 003 73 _J51 008 297 I COtdTRA COSTA COUNTY APf'ROPRiATiON ADJUSTMENT i. tiLF',:r�7,!E.17 CR 3UDGEi UPIIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Pg. 10 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Ojentit ) Fund BudactUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66)- 01 1003 450-7752 011 142 -7754 012 3 014 No 1 016 500 020 85 1 021 1x300 022 165 027 94 —8822 42x863 475-1013 1,094 —1014 1?537 —2100 288 —8822 3,414 490-2100 593 579-1013 549 —2100 142 —2302 1G2 630-1013 600 —2110 126 —2130 120 —2131 110 —2170 261 —2250 291 —2270 323 —2281 396 —7751 ^t�00 9„2 814 —7751 001 � 137 —7754 004 31 -7758 005 05 3 i 15 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1, DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pg. I I RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM " Decrease Increase Code :Quantity) Fund Bud etUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 659-1013 1161374 -1014 18,609 -2479 4,132 f -2302 320 -3550 121 -8821 172x862 671-2276 258 001-8822 121083 003- 9,530 004- 1,714 016- 2,664 030- R _ 62 043- 2,742 061- i 22291 j —8827 76,189 062-8822 48,227 —8827 21688 063-8822 39,965 149— II,524 200— 1 17710 210— ' 185 235— i 1,037 237- 83 243- 625 261- j 13 357-8822 38,944 I)���lJ 366- 1/ f 9 72 451- 11,538 472- 48x736 • ! CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE pg, 12 Card Special Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPE14SE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ` Increase Code Quantit ) Fund Budget Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 501-8822 149 502- 431 503- 6 508- I 4,046 583- I 112 650- I 41026 -8827 4,339 654-8822 1,357 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies General Fun 3641099 PROOF _Comp._ _K_P_ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outloy, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY TO adjust various cost centers countywide to reflect final 1976-77 expenditures. Individual cost centers Dote Description are adjusted internally wherever possible, the remainder Final 76-77 are taken from the Reserve for Contingencies. Adjustment \ APPROVED: SLQNATURES DATE AUDITOR—, CONTROLLER: /"NOV 2 2 1977 COUNTY NAV _ ADMINISTRATOR: 2 (il f BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors K nni.1:,.:: en Sc`arwrr,E�: ess,Hasschiae N G V u i977 NO%'-�G42!X— on J. R. OLSSAV, CLERK by see �- Asst. Budget Analyse o Fig UtirrezSignature , Title Date Approp -5 '—+ (M 129 REV. 2/75) .S � No. `� ee Instructions on Reverse Side Journal • '� CONT._RA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Public Works 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT as of 6A'30/77RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DBiECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Cade Quantic ) BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) ROAD & BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 01 1003 671 -2310 1 Rubberized Asphalt 47,000 2319 Road Job Contracts 228,099 2470 Road Materials 4,170 3541 Right of Way Development 30 f 1089 County Force Labor 228,099 SELECT ROAD & BRIDGE CONSTRUCT 661 -2319 Paso Corto Reconstruction 47,000 PUBLIC WORKS 650-2310 Professional Services 4,200 SELECT ROAD & BRIDGE RIGHT OF A 6 3-2310 Professional Services 6,303 3540 Rights of Way 2,168 3541 RW Development 4035 MINOR ROAD & BRIDGE RW 667-2310 Professional Services 1059 S 3540 Rights of Way 1,159 PROOF TOTAL _Comp._ _ K_P_ —VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) ENTRY 1976-7�7 Year-end adjustments. Date Description APPROVED: SIGN ESDATE AUDITOR- 1 2 2 19"7 CONTROLLER:tC NOV 2 n COUNTY l M�� NO 1977 ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD,OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: SOulxrr,sua Schroder,iiusycss,f iassclriae U 1977 0009.3 NO% on � J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by blie Works Director 10-25-7' � Rcb:;i ;Jeer'^' , Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. � (M 129 REV. 2/75) .SJournal No. Nee Instructions on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Final 1976-77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'; USE biaint, Radia f Elect, Equipment Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Cade Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 001-2276 72 030- 50 035- 50 Q62- 216 070- 503 079_ -. 482 200- 664 211- 184 214- 96 242- 120 25S_ _ 4,057 257- 118 260- 294 261- 338 264- 123 265- 210 308- 373 313- 169 314- 144 362- 1,112 366- 826 475- 84 540- 783 570- 100 650- 1,426 654- j 500 659- 599 599 671- 258 059- 3,397 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY , APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. GEPART`aENT OR, GUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct_ Decrease CR X,IN 66) 01 1003 055-1014 1,712 „ -2110 9:893 I -2170 485 -8822 10214 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies General Fund 1,596 II&P 1--14 / ' /,i- PROOF _Comp._ _ _K.P. V_E_R._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each TOTAL ENTRY To adjust individual cost center appropriations countywide to reflect final 1976777 charges for the maintenance of Date Description / radio $ electronic equipment, To adjust cost center 055, Radio Facilities, to reflect y- its status as fully cost applied, and return the balance to the reserve for contingencies, APPROVED: SIGN RES DATE AUDITOR— _ CONTROLLER: d V 2 n 19 COUNTY NOV 3 i977 ADMINISTRATOR: N Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER-, YES: SupC::"o:s Keir...F;hdca Sanztx':cr,SuSccss,Flsssckinr No:.`7Loa..L NOV 2 9 1977 01)09'1 �.--._ Asst. et Anals Budget Y A10V 2. Bud o J • u 1977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by � �. ' - C Rob I Gutler Signature Tit!e _ Q Q Dofe ` Approp.Ado. ✓tJ (M 129 REV, 2/75) Journal N . ' Sr,, ►rtslrvtrliuns utt Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Page I of 2 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub I is Warks RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE as of 6/30/77 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEIA^ Increase Fund decrease Code Quantit 1 Budoet Unit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-41 1 1 1 24'0 I 2401-2120 Ut i I i t;es 5551 1 9970 Reserve for Contingenc 5551 COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-46 2406 2406-2120 Utilities 2978 2310 Profess & Personal 131 9970 Reserve for Contingenc 3109 STORM DRAINAGE DISTRICT ZONE 1 2580 2580-3580 Grant in Aid 6361 2310 Profess d Personal 500 7700 001 Project E 6 F 500 7712 002 Contract E b F 4600 7712 003 Inspection 500 9970 Reserve for Contingenc 261 COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-6 2753 2753-1013 Temporary Salaries 5005 2100 Office Expense 972 2110 Communications 561 2160 ClothingJJV 496 2250 Hired Equipment :J 1689 2261 Bldg Maintenance 472 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works Page 2 of 2 -"T BU as of 6/30/77 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE OBJ CT 0 P 0 Increase Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM Decrease )3� (CR X IN 66) 6� Fund S. Code Quantity) Budoct Unit 06 ect Sub.Acct. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-6 Continued 01 2753 2753-2310 Profess & Personal 5903 2361 Workmens Comp Ins 647 2476 Recreation 2736 3550 Negotiated Damages 104 7713 001 Leasehold Impry 1322 7713 034 Room Divider 23 7752 035 Furniture 1 7754 004 Maintenance Tools 236 7753 002 Recreational Equip 681 9970 Reserve for Contingenc 19186 M PROOF Comp. I VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, list items and cost 0.f each TOTAL 1� ENTRY 1975-77 Year End Adjustments Data Description APPROVED: NATUR DA E AUDITOR— CONTROLL19. COUNTY 0 N 21 41977 ADMINISTRATOR: �f BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Suptrvistirs,Kcnny.':and4en Schroder,l3t)�css,Ii3sScIt'ne V '2) 1 7 NO% an Public Works Director 10/11/77 J. R. OLSSM, CLERK Signature Title Date I Approp.Adj. Journal No. (M 129 REV. 2/75) See histructions on Reverse Side page I of 3 Y CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE as of 6/30/77 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ` Decrease Increase Cade Quantity) Fund BudoetUnit Ob"ect Sub_Acct. CR X IN 661 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7A ct 2365 2365-7754 012 Scale Meter 2 5 S 7712 014 Sewer Sys Improv 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7A 2372 2372-2190 Publication of Notice 1331 2479 Other Spec Dep Exp 14310 2490 Misc Services 1360 7712 001 Subregional Fac 5410 17001 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 15 2388 2388-3530 Spec Svc Assess 320 5 S 2270 Repair b Service Equip 320 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 19 2393 2393-7712 007 Flow Meter 138 S 014 Instal 25 in gate 1156 015 Instal Hatchways 276 7790 Fixed Asset PY 9 7712 012 Plant Improv 1579 ( COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-12 I 2482 2482-2310 Profess & Fersonal 193 • page 2 of 3 i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub 1 is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE as of 6/30/77 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase ! Fund Decrease Code Quantity) Budget Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-12 - continued 01 2482 2482-7712 002* Landscaping 193 COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-17 2489 2489-2120 Utilities 1656 2282 Grounds Maintenance 385 3580 Grant in Aid 354 7712 003 Montaivin Phase 1 103 7750 014 Bayview Bleachers 7 7700 001 Bayview Site 2505 FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 3B 2520 2520-3540 Grn Vly RW 41600 7700 025 Fine Creek-BARTD RN 1088 7700 001 Arroyo Del Cerro 1088 7700 703 r'• V l y Rin; 41600 FLOOD CONTROL ZONE 1 2521 2521-3540 Lines E d E-1 RW 11970 7700 OD7 Marsh Crk Dam Esmts 218 703 Lines E & E-i RW 11970 006 Util E 3 El 218 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1 ����1� 2560 2560-7700 702 Line A RW 360 Page 3 of 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub I is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE as of 6/30/77 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Decrease CR X IN 66) Code Quantit Fund BuIaEiL�t Sub.Acct. ( STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (- continued 01 2560 2560-3541 RW Development 1360 1000 5' 7700 001 Line A Minert STORM DRAINAGE DISTRICTZONE13 2593 2593-2282 RW Maintenance 212 2319 Const Line 2 4747 7712 032 Const Line 2 4959 COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 2754 2754-1013 Temporary Salaries 31 f 2100 Office Expense 31 PROOF 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Dote Description 1976-77 Year End Adjustments APPROVED '�AI�KATURE.�_�/ VTE AUDITOR— CONTROLLf*,'_ COUNTY -,- ADMINISTRATOR: n�,cL��,�QV 2 3 1977 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny,F*d1cn r-',r,)dcr,BqZcss,Has5cItine 001 r, NO% t ublic Works Director 10/11/77 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK by GuitierrP�7 --Signature Titlei. Dote Approp,A, Journal No. (M 129 REV. 21/75) Set, Instructions on Reverse Side • CONTRA CGSTA tOUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public :irC_rk s Dept. RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE c !1t 7 l� _ Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIX nerease Fund Decrease Codc Quantic ) BudactUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) CCUN'TC SANITATION DISTRICT 7B 01 2366 2366-770C Fixed Asset P.Y. 81 S S S 227 . Repair 3c Service Equip 81 PROOF - Comp.- K_P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - ENTRY 1976-77 Year End Adjustments Date Description APPROVED: <41�,NATUR DA/�E AUDITOR- / �` 241 CONTROLLER: COUNTY t�0`J n ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny.Fanden Schrudcr.bu&�gcss.Hasschine n (�(� no N0-f�'!7f,e— Ibr4'v w J 977 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b _ Works Direnfior, l l -7l -7' Rol.; I Gut er, Signatur Title Date Approp.Adj. (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. ' .See Ltslruclinns tau Reverse Side • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. DBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ' Decrease Increase Code 4.iantit ) Fund BudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) Bethel Island Fire 01 2003 2003 2360 Insurance Other 526 S 7755 006 For Insurance Other 526 Byron Fire 2005 2005 2360 Insurance Other 347 7711 001 Building Construction 261 775" 005 Various Expenditures 608 Moraga Fire 2010 2010 7758 007 Plectron ffeceiver 5 j S S 006 For Plectron 5 Oakley Fire 2017 2017 2360 Insurance Other 3,359 1011 For Insurance Other 99 7750 001 For Insurance Other 149 003 For Insurance Other 179 004 For Insurance Other 17 005 For Insurance Other 54 006 For Insurance Other 177 7758 008 For Insurance Other 1,046 9970 For Insurance Other 2,138 Riverview Fire 2022 2022 7700 001 Land Purchased ( � 1� 179 7751 037 Electric Typewriter 1 1 147 IJ 7755 063 Various Expenditures 326 • i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Fund Decrease Code Quantity) BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) Tassajara Fire O/ 2023 2023 2281 Maintenance Building 2,810 S 7700 001 For Maintenance Building •1,632 7758 006 For Maintenance Building 1,178 Crockett-Carquinez Fire 2028 2028 7710 Oil Building Alteration 78 4 4 7750 001 For Building Alteration 78 Pinole Library 10 2710 2710 2310 Prof & Pers Services 8,750 S j 7711 002 For Prof & Pers Services 8,750 Ignacio Valley Library 13 2713 2713 2461 Books F Periodicals 2,160 7711 002 For Books $ Periodicals 2,160 CSA Police 1 2651 2651 1060 Insurance Contribution 36 ( 2250 Rent of Equipment 266 rJ l 2361 Workmen's Comp. 198 9970 Various Expenditures 500 CSA Police 5 2655 2655 2100 Office Expense 93 2250 Rent of Equipment 103 9970 Various Expenditures 00105 196 I • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT L DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase und F Code Quantity BudaetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) CSA P61ice 2 01 2652 2652 2130 Small Tools 383 { 2479 Other Special Dept. Exp. 1,027 S9970 Various Expenditures 1,410 PROOF _Comp._ _ _K;P_ _VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1976-77 year end adjustments Date Description APPROVED: %i G TURES TE AUDITOR- CONTROLLE,R' v COUNTY Q ADMINISTRATOR: NOVNO1977 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors b:u:,:;,.lWt. Swruder,BoiZw.Hasselune 00106 OV N 0:.�vC`7LC- n.: ti /Ae- J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b 1:0 C tierrCY/ Signature Title Approp.Adj. (M 129 REV. 2/75) Journal No. 'Nev /»s!r»clinns on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT L DEPARTMENT OR BUDGE f UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Consolidated Fire Protection District Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) Budoet Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 2025 2025 7710 618 Driver Training Area 33 704 Floor Covering 995 706 Air Cond Stn 1, 5, 14 1091 f 7712 608 Air Cond Stn 6, 13 155 7750 712 Dishwashers 1278 715 Portable Tank 25 726 Auxiliary Generator 9 767 Manikin 732 7752 736 Executive Desk 224 7753 737 Compact Sedan 678 7758 754 Microwave Alarm 15 7752 757 Lobby Furniture 1505 7750 725 Water Back Flow 12, 13, 14 2000 7711 304 Admin Bldg Construction 1734Y r. fV 1' 7 W f � G1 fT v- PROOF _Comp._ +K.P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Date Description Adjustment of Appropriations for Actual Expenditures /Is A,60LIL—� 1976-77 Year End Closing APPROVED: /SI MATURES D TE AUDITOR— CONTROLLER: UDITOR— l��!'/�, CONTROLLEF R. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: t NOV 1977 c BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Denny,Fah,'.rn SchfQtl.-I.Boggess.Hasseirine ah'ov ' s 1977 J. R. OLSSON\, CLERK by -� a. /�� Chief 11/17/77 Robbi' Signature Title Date Approp.Adj. (M 129 REV. 2/75) .S Journal No. ' re Instructions on Side �:flt�ll' }►�itr��iZ�l�j1 • lt:i�iiili: - j.�.'t.l:'ii«T1 t.T 1'.r`lli:..•t.•i. tl.: lt...• . .r - t TO CLIERIK BOMID OP surrrti�i ions at o t clock I•;_ Contra Co-ta County Record:, J. R. OLSSOI,i, County Recorder Tee S Official 730fi.RD Or SUPERVISORS., CO-31-TRA COSTA ,COJ?.TY, CA11FORI I t. In the ):Satter of Accepting and Giving }P ►E50LUiIO': 07 2jotice of Coapletion of Contract with ) and I•:OTICE OP Ci; :2LET1G:: Antioch Paving Company, Inc. (C. C.- §9-30066303'), Project No. 7561-4407-661-77 RESOLUTION 3:0. 77/97d The Board os Supervisors of Contra Costa County ]:ESOLVEES TILT: The County of Contra Costa on September 26, 1977 contracted -trith Antioch Paving Company, Inc. Route 1 , Box 612, Antioch, California 94509 _ Bane and J1QCress o:: Coal,-acro- ) f o. repair of base failures and placement of asphalt concrete overlay on Hillcrest Avenue bettreen Lone Tree Way and the Contra Costa Canal in the Antioch area, Proiect No. 7561-4407-661-77, With United Pacific Insurance Company of Tacoma, Washington as SUZIC-•;, -s L j i i:_-1i a o.'_* lJon din g Company) for work to be periormed on the Croy.:_^__s of the Coan t3; and • c� The Public: Works Director reports that said vor?: has beeninspected and complies with the approved plans, special provision 5, and o titaaidard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete z as of November 10; 1977 ; Therefore, said ivory is accepted as completed on said date, -and the e Clerk shall file with the Cou.--i ty Recorder a cony of this Resolution and Notice as 'a Notice of Completion for •said co.—_16 . cc - o PASSED AND ADOPTED ON November 29, 1977 _ - CERTIF!%G TI 011 and ITiRIF I C.tT1 OBI I certify that the f o-epoi•nv is a true and correct copy of a resolu- . tion and acceptance . duly adopted znzd entered on the nir_utes of i':is Board ' s meetinr; on th4 above da-e. I decla—z-a i_,n ler. penal ILY of perjury that 42he foregoing is true .znd correct. - Dated: November 29, 1977 J. R. OLSSO,:, County Clerk & at Martinez, California ex officio Clerk of the Board BY - epu cy Clerk Origin tore Public Works Department, Construction Division - cc: xecora aria re*i;urn Contractor Auc1itor. Publi c l:orks A A111-i"; 1444444-4;x PiESO7.UTION IN0. 77/976 00108 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion RESOLUTION NO. 77/977 of improvements, Subdivision 4620, Danville Area. The Public Works Director has notified this Board that improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4620, Danville area, as provided in the agreement heretofore approved by this Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in Subdivision 4620 have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4620 May ll, 1976 (Industrial Indemnity Co. - YS 751- 4085) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 135576 dated April 28, 1976) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Auditor Controller �eee�r Public Works Director Mahlon C. Connett 2425 East Street Concord, CA 94520 RESOLUTION NO. 77/977 00109 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Re: Intention to Adopt Resolution ) of Necessity to Acquire Real ) Property by Eminent Domain, ) RESOLUTION NO. 77/ 978 for Green Valley Creek - East ) Branch Detention Basin, ) (C.C.P. Sec. 1245.235) Danville Area ) Work Order No. 8544-7520 ) Flood Control Zone 3B ) RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY The Board of Supervisors as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District RESOLVES THAT: It intends to adopt a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of Real Property in the Danville area, for a flood control detention basin, a public improvement, which property is more particularly described in Appendix "A" attached hereto. This Board will meet on December 20, 1977, at 10:55 a.m, in the Board's Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, to hear those persons whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appear on the last equalized County assessment roll , and to consider the adoption of the Resolution. The Real Property Agent is DIRECTED to send the following notice to each such person by first-class mail : NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water .Conservation District declares its intention to adopt a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of real property in the Danville area, for a flood control detention basin, a public improvement, which property is more particularly described in the attachment hereto. The Board will meet on December 20, 1977, at 10:55 a.m. in the Board Chambers at 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California to consider the adoption of the Resolution. Each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appear on the last equalized County assessment roll has the right to..appear at such hearing and be heard on: l .' Whether the public interest and necessity require the project. 2. Whether the project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. PASSED on November 29, 1977, unanimously by Supervisors present. Originator: Public Works Department Real Property Division cc: Flood Control County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 77/978 Ujt.a,11 tdl1t-j Uc."I1b1U11 udb1n APPENDIX- "A" ' That parcel of land in the unincorporated area of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Portion of Sections 22 and 23, To:•rnship 1 South, Range 1 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridians described as follows : Commencing at an iron pipe at the intersection of the center line of Calle Crespi with the center line of Diablo Road formerly El Camino Tassajara, being the southeast corner of Lot 176, designated _ on the map of Yount Diablo Estate Park Subdivision, First Unit, filed May 6s 1916, I•lap Book 15, page 301; thence north 890 15' 45" east, . along said center line, 276 .72 feet to an iron pipe ; thence continuing along said center line of El Camino Tassajara, (from this point east known as Blackhawk Road) south 590 051 east, 399. 30 feet to the true point of beginning, which point bears nal-*: 590 05 ' west, 14.90 feet along said center line from the most easterly corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Ewell W. Slade, et ux, recorded February 28, 1949, Book 1356, Official Records , page 182 ; thence from said point of beginning south 190 31' 05" west, 1076.26 feet to a point which bears south 820 201 - west., 6.92 feet and south 880 241 cresttr 12.54 feet from the east line of said Slade parcel thence south 880 211 west, 153. 56 feet; thence north 710 241 west, 230 feet; thence north 490 431 west, 6.97 feet; thence north 490 381 45" west, 98.44 feet; thence north 820 571 45" west, 115. 38 feet; thence north 390 23' ~Jest, 55.92 feet; to the most southerly corner of the parcel of land described as Parcel Two in the deed to E. N. Thomas, et ux, recorded Ilay 16 , 1955, Book 2533, Official Records , page 101; thence north 380 321 41" west, along a southwest line of said Parcel Two, 38.40 feet to a point which bears south 200 251 41" east, 169 .65 feet from a southerly line of the - parcel of land described in the deed to Kenneth Richardson, recorded May 16, 1955, Book 2533, Official Records, page 156; thence north 200 251 41" west, 169. 65 feet to said southerly line ; thence along the exterior lines of said Richardson deed, 2533 OR 156, as follows : North 690 08' 09" east, 174. 38 feet ; northerly along; the are of a curve having a radius of 330 feet, the center of which bears north 690 081 09" east, an arc distance of 10 feet, more or less to a point from which the center of said curve bears north 710 361 25" east ; north 710 361 25" east, 153.09 feet; north 40 441 26" cast, 167 feet ; south 850 15' 34" east, 2.68 feet, and north 40 441 26-" east, 263.47 feet to a cors-ker on the easterly line of said Richardson property , which corner bears south 890 151 4511 west, 28.28 feet, south 190 49 ' 40" west, 282.24 feet and south 710 021 30" east, 30 . 81 flet from the southeast corner of Lot •176; thence south 710 021 30" east, 260 .23 feet; thence north 190 .011 east, 385 feet to a point in the center Line of said Blackhawk Road; thence south 590 051 east, 399. 30 feet to the true point of beginning. Microfilmed with board order BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Intention to Adopt Resolution ) of Necessity to Acquire Real ) RESOLUTION NO. 77/979 Property by Eminent Domain, ) for Buchanan Field Airport ) (C.C.P. Sec. 1245.235) Runway 19-R Clear Zone ) ` (Work Order 5438-927) ) RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: It intends to adopt a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of Real Property in the Concord area, for airport clear zone easements, a public improvement, which property is more particularly described in Appendix "A" attached hereto. This Board will meet on December 20, 1977, at 11 :00 a.m. , in the Board's Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, to hear those persons whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appear on • the last equalized County assessment roll , and to consider the adoption of the Resolution. The Real Property Agent is DIRECTED to send the following notice to each such person by first-class mail : NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County declares its intention to adopt a Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of real property in the Concord area, for airport clear zone easements, a public improvement, which property is more particularly described in the attachment hereto. The Board will meet on December 20, 1977, at 11 :00 a.m. , in the Board Chambers at 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, to consider the adoption of the Resolution. Each person whose property is to be acquired and whose name and address appear on the last equalized County assessment roll has the right- to appear at such hearing and be heard on: 1. ,Whether the public interest and necessity require the project. 2. Whether the project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 3. Whether the property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. PASSED -on-November 29, 1977, unanimously by Supervisors present. Originator: Public Works Dept. , Real Property Div. cc: County Counsel Airport Manager RESOLUTION NO. 77/979 001 a_2 1 Buchanan Field Airport Runway 19-R Clear Zone APPENDIX "A" PARCEL ONE (R/W Parcel 9 - Contra Costa County Water District) Portions of Parcel B, as said parcel is shown on the Parcel Map, recorded February 9, 1972 in Book 20 of Parcel Maps, at page 42, Records of Contra Costa County, California, lying in the Rancho Monte Del Diablo, described as follows: Beginning on the northeasterly line of Solano Way at the most southerly corner of said Parcel B (20 PM 42); thence, from said point of beginning, along said northeasterly line North 330 51 ' 58" West, 34.98 feet to a point on the easterly line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right of way, from which a radial line of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 1116.01 feet, bears North 700 59' 34" East; thence, northerly along said easterly .line and curve, through a central angle of 00 52' 4111, an arc distance of 17.10 feet; thence, North 300 11 ' 20" East, 149.65 feet to the easterly Tine of said Parcel B; thence, along said easterly line South 00 46' 02" West 161 .17 feet to the southerly line of said Parcel B; thence, along said southerly line South 74° 23' 02" West 50.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 0.167 acres, (7261 square feet) of land more or less. PARCEL TWO (R/W Parcel 9A - Contra Costa County Water District) Beginning on the northerly line of Parcel B (20 PM 42) as said parcel is described in Parcel One above distant South 76° 29' 15" East, 333.29 feet from the easterly line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company right of way; thence, from said point of beginning, along said northerly line of Parcel B (20 PM 42) South 76° 29' 15" East, 300.83 feet; thence, easterly along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 800.00 feet, through a central angle of 10 48' 03", an arc distance of 25.14 feet; thence, non- tangent to said curve, South 330 00' 33" West, 74.83 feet to the northerly line of Parcel A as said parcel is shown on said Parcel Map (20 PM 42) ; thence, along said northerly line South 82° 48' 02" West, 388.23 feet; thence, North 300 11 ' 20" East, 216.56 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 1 .029 acres (44,830 square feet) of land more or less. PARCEL THREE (R/W Parcel 10 - Galindo Assoc.) Portion of Parcel A as said parcel is shown an the Parcel Map filed February 9, 1972 in Book 20 of Parcel Maps, at page 42, Records of Contra Costa County, California,_ lying in the Rancho Monte Del Diablo, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of said Parcel A (20 PM 42); thence, from said point of beginning along the westerly line of said Parcel A (20 PM 42) North 00 46' 02" East, 379.69 feet to the northerly line of said Parcel A (20 PM 42); thence, along said northerly line North 820 48' 02" East, 523.33 feet; thence, South 330 00' 33" West, 435.22 feet to the southerly line of said Parcel A (20 PM 42) ; thence, along said southerly line South 74° 23' 02" West, 298.20 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 3.247 acres (141 ,427 square feet) of land more or less. Bearings used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System Zone III. 00) 1 .1.3 t d BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Consummate Purchase and ) Accept Deed of Moore Property ) RESOLUTION NO. 77/980 in Martinez, County Civic ) Center (1211 , 1215 Escobar ) (Gov. C. Sec. .25350) Street, Martinez). ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: This Board on October 18, 1977, passed Resolution of Intention No. 77/851 , and notice fixing November 29, 1977 at 10:45 a.m. , in its Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place when it Q' would meet to consummate purchase of the real property described therein from Robert M. Moore, said property being required for the County Civic Center; CQ said Resolution was duly published in the "Morning News Gazette." C) The Board hereby consummates said purchase and approves the Purchase cr�'l Y Agreement dated October 11 , 1977 between Robert M. Moore and the County for o the property located at 1211, 1215 Escobar Street, Martinez; and authorizes the County Administrator to sign said Purchase Agreement on behalf of the County. Q-� The County Auditor is hereby DIRECTED to draw a warrant chargeable to 5 Account No. 0115-4013 in favor of Escrow Number M-310404-2,. Western Title Insurance Company, 821 Main Street, Martinez, California, in the sum of o $89,500.00 for said property for payment to Robert M. Moore, upon his conveying to the County a Grant Deed therefor. t° - Said Deed, dated October 11 , 1977, is hereby ACCEPTED and the Clerk of this Board is ORDERED to have it recorded, together with a certified copy of this Resolution. PASSED on November 29, 1977, unanimously by the Supervisors present. Originator: Public Works Department, Real Property Division cc: County Administrator County Auditor , Recorder (c/o R/P) RESOLUTION NO. 77/980 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Subdivision 4952 ) Annexation to County Service Area ) RESOLUTION NO. 77/981 M-22, San Ramon Area ) (Gov.C. 5§56320, 56322, 56323; 56450) RESOLUTION ORDERING SUBDIVISION 4952 ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-22 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On October 18, 1977 this Board adopted Resolution No. 77/850 initiating proceedings for the subject annexation to County Service Area 12-22. The subject Annexation Territory and County Service Area Territory are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This annexation had been proposed by applications of the owners filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Com- mission on June 11, 1977. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with street lighting, street sweeping and landscape maintenance services. On October 5 , 1977, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the subject annexation to County Service Area M-22, with boundaries as described in Exhibit "A" . Said Commission also declared the territory proposed to be annexed as legally uninhabited, and assigned the proposal the designation of "Subdivision 4952 Annexation to County Service Area M-22" . The exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed are as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. This Board, at the time and place set for said hearing of this annexation, heard the determination of the Local Agencv Formation Commission read aloud, called for evidence or protests as provided for by Government Code Section 56314, and heard and duly considered such evidence and protests. This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest of the people of County Service Area M-22. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is legally uninhabited, and that no landowner therein filed a written protest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, along with the appropriate fees, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, in accordance with Government Code Section 56450. PASSED AND ADOPTED on November 29, 1977. DCG:g Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 77/981 41. J� 165-I ?•:•.�:r:i= DaJcrioon, D tis 1015/7' BY; I subdi*r±cion 4932 Annexation to Comity Service Aram u-22 Being a portion of Iia.-echo San Ramon, described as follows; Beginning at a point on the southern boundary of County Service . Area L-42, said point being at the intersection of the southeastern extension of the northeastern line of Twin Creeks Drive -idth the center of Norris Canyon Road; thence, Leaving said boundary of Cowity. Se-'wice.Area L-42, Easterly, along the center of Norris Canyon ?,oad, 1080 feet, =ore or less, to its intersection with the center of San Ramon Valley Boulevard; thence Southeasterly and Southerly, along the center of San P.azan Valley Boulevard, 4800. feet, nors or less, to its intersecticn with. tha center, of Bol�.ngs,- Canyon Road; thence Westerly and ;forth-;esterly, along the center of Bollinger Canyon P.oad, 5100 T eat, mora or less, to its intersection with the center of Morris Canyon. P.aad; thence Northeasterly, along the center of Norris Canyon Road, 950 feat, more or less, to its intersection with the southeastern extension of t the soul waster- Una of Lot 85, Tract 3869, filed October 24, 1969, 3n Map Book 128, at pave 3'-:, said point being on the southern bou=cdanJ of County Service Area I-42; thence Northeasterly, along the center of Dorris Canyon Road and said ba"-idary of County Service Area L•1:2, 1930 feet, rare or less, to the point of beQizLning. ContaLz--L*:o 287.65 acres, rare or less. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFOICUTA Re: Cancel Redemption Penalty and Fee ) on 1976-77 Secured Assessment Roll. ) RESOLUTI013 ITO. 77/ 982 TAX COLLECTOR'S 221.10: 1. Parcel No. 134-373-002-2 - Sale No. 76-1209. Due to clerical error payment received timely was not applied to the applicable tax bill; resulting in redemption penalty and fee attaching thereto. Having received timely payment, I now request cancellation of the redemption penalty and fee, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4985. Dated: November 17, 1977 EMIARD W. ZEAL, Tax Collector I consent, to this cancellation. JOHN . LAUSEN, Co y el By: -.��� s Asst. ��� Deputy X X x X X—X—XXX—XXX—X X—X—XX X X X X X X—X—X—X X—X X—X— —X X—X—XX—X X—Y.X X BOA-RD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above statute, and showing that the redemption penalty and fee attached because of clerical error, the Auditor is ORDERED to CANCEL them. PASSED ON November 29 1977 , by unanimous vote of Supervisors present._ APL:jam cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector (Redemption Dept.) RESOLUTION 110. 77/982 BOARD OF SUPERtiISORS , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re. ) Annexation to the City of ) RESOLUTION I•110. 77/ Concord, Authorization of ) City to Conduct Building ) Inspections ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: County Ordinance Code Section 72-4 .006(2) provides a procedure for inspection of buildings in areas in the process of annexation to incorporated cities . contra Costa County Assessor's Parcels Nos . . ( Annexation) is in the process of being annexed to the City of Concord. Said City Council by a resolution duly and regularly passed and adopted on a certified copy of :which is on file with the Clerk of this Board, has certified that the City has a building code equal to the building code ordinance of the County of Contra Costa and has requested that this Board authorize the inspection of all buildings and structures in said territory subject to annexation by the City , and that fees payable be collected by the City. Based on said resolution, this Board hereby finds that the City of Concord has a building code equal to that of the building code ordinance of the County of Contra Costa and that said City -is AUTHORIZED and DIRECTED to cause all buildings and structures erected on Parcels hos Annexation) to be inspected by City forces , and that all fees payable in connection with said inspection may be collected and retained by the City . ?t:SSr:D on 1977 unanimously by Supervisors Present . CC : city of Concord county Counsel Building Inspection county .dmi.nistrato-r copy, 1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONLaERXKBOARD 2 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNT T 3 In the Matter of Requesting the Board of Supervisors to Grant to4 Cityof Concord Jurisdiction Over_x.83 Acres Presently in the County, S pE IS04T Co. 5 for Purposes of Issuing, Building Permits and Conducting Construction 8 Inspections Pending Cook Annexation. RESOLUTION NO. 77-5839 7 8 WHEREAS, application for annexation has been made to the City of Concord 9 by property owners owning 75.81 percent of the land area and over two-thirds 10 (2/3) of the assessed value of all the property described in the Cook Annexation, 11 known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 147-331-017, 018, 019, 022, 054 and 055 and 12 consisting of 5.83 acres; and 13 WHEREAS, some property owners have asked the City of Concord to assume 14 ,jurisdiction over this area in regards to new construction inspection; and 15 WHEREAS, pursuant to Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, Section 72-4.006, 16 the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa has provided for a 17 procedure for inspection of construction and buildings in areas in the process 18 of annexation to incorporated cities; and 19 WHEREAS, Concord has a Building Code equal to the Building Code Ordinance 20 of the County of Contra Costa; and 21 WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the Cook Annexation 22 to the City of Concord on July 6, 1977; 28 1i NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of the County 24 of Contra Costa be, and it is hereby requested to authorize the City of Concord 25 to issue building permits and to inspect all buildings, structures and 26 construction in said territory subject to annexation, and to allow fees payable 27 therefor to be collected and retained by the City of Concord. The City Clerk 28 is directed to cause a certified copy of this resolution to be transmitted to Microfilmed with board ordet 1 the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Counlky. 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of 3 the City of Concord on November 7, 1977, by the following, vote: 4- AYES: Councilmembers - L.Azevedo, J.Bulman, W.Dixon, R.Holmes, R.La Pointe 5 NOES: Councilmembers - None s ABSENT: Councilmembers - None 7 ---- --- ----- --- 8 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 77-5839 was duly and 9 regularly adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the 10 City of Concord on November 7, 1977. it 12 13 BERNADETTE CARROLL, City Clerk 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Of)1.20 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Request of ) Concord TV Cable for Rate ) Increase and Rate Setting ) RESOLUTION NO. 77/984 Procedure Modification. ) WHEREAS the Board on November 22, 1977 having fixed this time for hearing on the request of Concord TV Cable that the County grant the same rate increase and modification in the rate setting procedure granted by the City of Concord so that uniform rates may be maintained throughout the entire area served by Concord TV Cable; and WHEREAS Chairman, W. N. Boggess having advised that over 90 percent of the subscribers reside within the City of Concord and that the requested increase and modification in the rate setting procedure have been carefully analyzed by city staff followed by a public hearing and subsequently approved; and WHEREAS Chairman Boggess having further reported that said request would result in a uniform rate for all subscribers served by the CATV system and that county staff has reviewed the matter and recommends approval; and WHEREAS the hearing having been opened, and no one having appeared in opposition; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that the hearing is CLOSED and the rate schedule of Concord TV Cable is APPROVED in accordance with the attached schedule, effective January 1, 1978. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, effective January 1, 1979 an increase of up to the maximum percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland area, as determined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period of September, 1977 through September, 1978, is AUTHORIZED subject to the condition that Concord TV Cable must notify the Board of Supervisors and all County subscribers in writing of the proposed rate changes at least 30 days prior to the effective date of such changes . PASSED AND ADOPTED this 29th day of November, 1977. cc: Concord TV Cable , County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 77/984 �411;�1 �c:Lteauie ► CONCORD TV CABLE RATE SCHEDULE Current Proposed MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGES Rates January 1, 1978 First Primary Outlet $ 6.20 $ 6.82 Additional TV Outlets/each 1.50 1.65 Additional .FM Outlets/each 1.50 1.65 Commercial Outlets/each 3.00 3.30 INSTALLATION CHARGES Residential Underground 20.00 22.00 Aerial 10.00 11.00 Commercial T & M* Public and Educational First Outlet -0- Additional Outlets T & M* ADDITIONAL TV & FM INSTALLATION CHARGES Residential At time of initial installation -0- Subsequent call back installation/each 10.00 11.00 Reconnect Charge 10.00 11.00 Relocation Charge 10.00 11.00 *Time & Material IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AS EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE C014TRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 15 Re: Condemnation of Property ) for a Public Sewer System, ) RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY Bethel Island Area ) NO. 77/ 985 W.O. No. 5400-927' ) (C.C.P. Sec. 1245.230) Sanitation District No. 15 ) ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as ex officio Governing Board of Contra Costa Sanitation District No. 15, by vote of two-thirds or more of its members, RESOLVES that: Pursuant to Health & Safety Code SS4740 and 4741, Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15 intends to construct a sewer system, a public improvement, and, in connection therewith, acquire an interest in certain real property. The property to be acquired consists of two (2) parcels and is generally located in the Bethel Island area adjacent to Willow Road. Said property is more particularly described in Appendix A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On October 11, 1977, this Board passed a resolution of in- tention to adopt a resolution of necessity for the acquisition by eminent domain of the property described in Appendix A (Resolution No. 77/840) and fixing November 8, 1977, in its chambers in the Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon. The hearing was held at that time and place and at that time was continued to November 15,• 1977. The November 15 hearing was held and continued to November* 29, 1977. Based upon the evidence presented to it at these hearings, this Board finds, determines and hereby declares the following: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed project; 2. The proposed project is planned and located in the manner which will be most compatible with the greatest _public good and the least private injury; and 3. The property described herein is necessary for the proposed project. The County Counsel of this County is hereby AUTHORIZED and EMPOWERED: To acquire in the District's name, by condemnation, the titles, easements and rights-of-way hereinafter described in and to said real property or interest(s) therein, in accordance with the provisions for eminent domain in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution of California: all parcels are sought to be acquired as easements for sanitary sewers. To prepare and prosecute in the District's name such pro- ceedings in the proper court as are necessary for such acquisition; and R M SOLli s 1J 1 _: '77/4785 . 00123 To deposit the probable amount of compensation, based on an appraisal, and to apply to said court for an order permitting the District to take immediate possession and use said real property for said public uses and purposes. PASSED AND ADOPTED on November 29, 1977 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors - Kenny, Fanden, Schroder, Hasseltine, Boggess NOES: None_ ABSENT: None ✓ UGlauta u. 1Y1�1.�U11 cc: i�ublic Works Director Mr. William Boyd, via Real Property Mr. John J. McNamara, via Real Property I-Zr. Joseph Spotts, via Real Property Mr. Richard Pearson, via Real Property Mr. Mike Landis, C.D.M. , via Real Property Environmental Control, Attn: Robert Jackson County Administrator County Auditor-Controller -2- RESOLUTION NO. 77/185_ �(}124 r Sanitary District No. 15 Resolution 77/g85 APPENDIX "A" PARCEL NO. 24 (Domingo) All that portion of the NW 1/4 and the NE 1/4 of Section 14 Township 2 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M., County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the most southerly corner of Lot 166 as said Lot is shown and so designated on the Official Map of Pleasantimes Subdivision, re- corded in the office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County, in Book 27 of Maps, at page 26; thence from said point of beginning along the northerly line of Parcel Four as said parcel is so designated in that certain deed, recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said County, in Book 7914 of Official Records, at page 638, thence South 64' 17' West 27.50 feet; thence, leaving said northerly line North 25° 43' West 577.44 feet to a point on the southerly line of that certain parcel of land in that certain deed, recorded in the office of the County Recorder of said County, in Book 1669 of Official Records, at page 93: thence, along said southerly line North 75° 28' East 28.03 feet to a point on the westerly line of said Pleasantimes Subdivision; thence, leaving last said southerly line and along said westerly line South 25° 43' East 572.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.363 acres of land more or less. PARCEL NO. 33 (Avery) All that portion of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 3, Township 2 North, Range 3 East, M.D.M., County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at the easterly line of that certain parcel of land described in that certain deed recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said County in Book 7209 of Official Records, at page 62 from which point the most southerly corner of Lot 21 , as said lot is shown and so designated on the official map of Subdivision No. 3870 recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said County in Book 129 of Maps, at page 46, bears the following two (2) courses: (1) North 17° 08' 42" West 112.00 feet, and (2) North 08° 46' 28" West 147.34 feet; thence, from said point of beginning North 72" 16' 37" East 60.00 feet; thence, South 17° 08' 42" East 20.00 feet; thence, South 72° 16' 37" West 60.00 feet; thence, North 17° 08' 42" West 20.00 feet to the point of beginning and containing 0.028 acre more or less. 00125 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on the ) Appeal of Kay Building Company ) et al from Action of the Planning ) November 29, 1977 Commission on Application for ) Development Plan 3032-77, Danville ) Area. ) The Board on November 8, 1977 having fixed this time for hearing on the appeal of Kay Building Company and the Danville Station Homeowners Association from Planning Commission denial of Final Development Plan No. 3032-77, Danville area; and Mr. Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning, having advised that the application would amend the Final Development Plan to add two tennis courts to the existing recreation facilities and that the Planning Commission denied the request based on the fact that the proposed location of the courts would not be harmonious with the surrounding residential properties; and Mr. Philip Harris , representing the Danville Station Homeowners Association, having stated that the additional tennis courts are n%eded to accomodate the Danville Station residents, that the location was chosen for the proximity to existing recreational and parking facilities, and that the courts will be built intoa hillside approximately eight feet below property level with extensive landscaping thereby insulating the new facilities from the nearest Greenbrook residents; and Mr. Ralph Farinha, Mr. Clinton Graves, and Mr. John Hubitsky, Greenbrook residents, having stated that the existing problems of noise, traffic and lighting would be compounded with the addition of two new tennis courts and that other areas within the Danville Station subdivision could be utilized rather than enlarging the present facilities ; and Mr. Harris, in rebuttal, having stated that the only other available location is a walnut grove surrounded by creeks and, due to Flood Control District easements and lack of parking and restroom facilities, the cost of development would be prohibitive; and Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having stated that a need for additional tennis courts does exist in the area and in his opinion the proposal would not present any serious impact on the surrounding homes if a 10 p.m. curfew were imposed on all four courts and, therefore, having recommended that the appeal be granted subject to the conditions recommended by Planning staff and amended to reflect said curfew; and Supervisor R. I. Schroder having stated that he would prefer to eliminate the lighting for the two additional courts but would concur with the recommended 10 p.m. curfew for all four courts; and Supervisor N. C. Fanden having stated that she was not entirely satisfied with the proposed location and would prefer a 9:30 p.m. curfew; and The Board members having discussed the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the appeal of Kay Building Company and the Danville Station Homeowners Association is GRANTED and Final Development Plan No. 3032-77 . is APPROVED subject to conditions (Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by referenced made a part hereof) . PASSED cr_ November 29, 1977 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, R. I. Schroder, E. H. Hasseltine and W. N. Boggess. NOES: Supervisor N—C. Fanden, ABSENT: None. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of the original document which is on file in my office. and that it was passed & adopted b, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. California. on the date shown. ATTEST:. J. lw oi.sso`. Count.v Clerk&6x-officio Clerk of said Board of supervisors, epu"erk. } eIINOV 29197' .Ranc'l Anic.ai;i CC: Kay Building Company Danville Station Homeowners Assn. Director of Planning County Assessor 0012 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions for Approval of Final Development Plan 3032-77 1. Approval is based on the plans received by the Planning Department on June 6, 1977 with the following conditions. 2. No permanent structures .other than drainage structures shall be con- structed within or over any dedicated drainage easement. 3. Submit site grading and drainage plans to the Public Works Department, * Land Development Division, for review prior to the issuance of any building permits or the construction of site improvements. 4. Collect all storm water flows entering- and originating within the developed portion of the subject property and convey them to an exist- ing adequate drainage facility. S. A drainage permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, for any work done within the existing .storm drainage easements. The proposed easterly tennis court shall be located outside the storm drainage easement, or a solution satisfactory to the Public Works Department shall be reached. 6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, submit landscape plans to the Director of Planning which incorporate additional mounding and dense evergreen planting, such as redwood trees, to provide an adequate screen between the tennis courts and the homes along the south property boundary. T. Lights shall be deflected to shine on the courts and court lights on all four courts shall not be permitted after 10:00 p.m. and enforced by the Danville Station Homeowners' Association. 8. This application is subject to prior approval by the Planning Commission of Final Development Plan Modification 3033-77 segregating the Danville Station Planned Unit District into two entities, Danville Station com- prised of Subdivisions 4336, 4410 and 4411 and Danville Place comprised of Subdivision 4439, each to have and be responsible for their respective open space and recreation facilities. DP:lsw 8-11-77 12-6-77 00128 t (, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of In-Home Care Program. The Board on October 18, 1977 having heard a presentation on the program operation and cost claiming procedures of the In-Home Care Program in this County, and the Board having referred the matter to the Internal Operations Committee (Supervisor Eric Hasseltine and Supervisor Nancy Fanden) on the aforementioned date for further review and discussion with County staff from the County Administrator's Office, Human Resources Agency, Social Service and Health Departments; and The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Hasseltine and Fanden) having met with appropriate County staff on November 23, 1977 to further consider the funding and claiming aspects of the In-Home Care Program; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the report of the Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Hasseltine and Fanden) dated November 29, 1977 is HEREBY APPROVED and the following actions are AUTHORIZED: 1. The Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to explore the possibility of utilizing CETA funds to provide for (a) an increased level of training for In-Home Care providers, and (b) for expansion of the In-Home Care Program to low and middle income recipients who are presently ineligible for such services. 2. The County Counsel is hereby DIRECTED to provide periodic reports to the Board on the status of the lawsuit now pending which was authorized by the Board on January 25, 1977 and which has the Board's REAFFIRMED SUPPORT pursuant to its action of this date. PASSED BY THE BOARD ON NOVEMBER 29, 1977. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Bocrd of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Vlel fare Director Supervisors Health Officer affixed this29th day of November 1977 Contracts Unit Manpower Director Deputy Director, HRA J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator � County Counsel Byg/CL-rn..c1 of*"\_h7Gii a r • Deputy Clerk County Auditor Jamie L. Johnson 00129 H-24 4/77 15m The Board of Supervisors Contra .IsmrsN.Ctsson COW-n!I Ex Ott,,:,u C,-r%c••the Board C. jnr y �'Cministration Building Costa Mrs.Carald,neRussell P.O. 3o ti 91 I Chet•., .r Var:;ne_ Cahfornia 94553 County lames P.1.0tnny-P.:chmond r+ Nancy C.canden-Martinez ..` y.„r.w.'j Rcbert 1.Schroder-Lafayette Warren N.Boggess-Concord I.;:r.c' Eric H.Hassettine-Pittsburg °'S'r"1 November 29, 1977 REPORT OF INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE ON IN-HOME CARE PROGRAM On October 18, 1977 the Board heard a presentation by County staff on this subject. At the conclusion of the presentation the Board referred this subject matter to the Internal Operations Committee for further review. The Committee met .-A th the Human Resources Director and staff from the Social Service Department and County Administrator's Office on November 23. The Committee received a report from the Human Resources Director, copies of which are attached for the Board members explaining .he ;,Tanner in which money is claimed against ''he In-Horl.e Care program for various purposes. Staff from the Social Service Department explained various elements of the In-Home Care program. As a result of this meeting, the Committee is generally satisfied with the way in which the In-Home Care program is presently being operated in this County and with the way in which costs are being claimed. The Committee is, however, concerned that the In-Home Care program be made available to more low and middle income, elderly, and disabled persons. The Committee is also concerned with the status of the court suit which the County has filed against the State. The Internal Operations Committee therefore recommends that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: 1 . Acknowledge receipt of this report and indicate their general support for the manner in which the In-Home Care program is presently being operated in this County. 2. Order the Human Resources Director to explore the possibility of utilizing CETA funds to provide an increased level of training for In-Home Care providers. 3. Order the Human Resources Director to explore the possibility of using CETA funds to provide In-Home Care services to those low and middle income recipients presently ineligible for In-Home Care services. Microiitmed ,vitit board order. 00130 -4- Express their continued support for the lawsuit authorized by the Board on January 25, 1977 and request the County Counsel to provide periodic reports to the Board on the status of the lawsuit. 5. Remove this item as a referral to the Internal Operations Committee. Eric H. Aliasseltine idancy C. FakAen Supervisor, District V Supervisor, M strict II Nt;cro-sall--► v✓irn board order, 00 c�� + T-1 peS OW-ceS A o ency D: ze 23, 1977 CONTRA COST, 0) 'NTY � �1J•1 _ Supe�vi sor Eric H. Hassel ti ne To Supervisor Nancy C. Fandt n internal ClJer tions Com.ml tt`e oft From C. C. 'tan ;•tarter, Director Subs CARE PROGRAM Your Co.-,,mi ttee will recall that on October 18 a presentation was made before the Board on this subject. At the conclusion of the presentation the Board referred to your Committee the issue of the In-Home Care program and its operating costs. You have asked that we meet with you today to go over this subject. Attached is a chart which shows the amounts claimed from State and Federal funds for various aspects of the In-Home Care program for each quarter of the 1970-1977 fiscal year. The first columnshows the comparison of all Title XX service costs at the worker and first line supervisor level charged to the In-Hoge Care program. This percentage is derived through tine studies which staff maintain on a daily basis and should represent a fairly accurate picture of the proportion of our Title XX Social Service tim.a going into this program. You will note that the percentage increased during eacil quarter of the last fiscal year. This does not mean that an increased amount of staff was devoted to in-Home Care. To the best of my knoaledga, the In-Hom.e Care program remained fairly stable in staffing level throUr11- out the fiscal year. Because of the ongoing attrition of social work stag► a smaller proportion of their time has been devoted to other programs. Therefore, the increasing percentage of time devoted to In-Home Care is directly attributable to attrition in other programs. The second column labeled Group I represents the approximate cost of salaries and fringe benefits for the social work staff and first line supervisors in the In-Home Care program. This figure is derived by taking the- total salary and fringe benefit costs for all Title XX social workers and supervisors and applying the percentage from the first column to that total cost. The figure is, therefore, somewhat of an approximation but should be fairly accurate. The third coluimn labeled Group II represents the overhead costs assigned to 'he In-Ho„me Care program. This includes clerical staff, administrative staff above the first line supervisor, space costs, and other indirect costs billed from other County departments. This cost is calculated in the same manner as the Group I costs in that all overhead costs in the department are added up, a portion of them are assigned to Title XX based on the percentage of tire staff spent on Title XX compared with other pro-rams, and then percentage from the first column is applied to that amount. This figure does not bear any direct relationship to the actual overhead costs of the In-Home Care program. It is, however, the method we must use in allocating costs not only to this program but to all other programs for which we claim State and Federal funds. The only alternative (srhi ch is not available to us at this time) is to maintain an elaborate accounting system [Aicrof0med %with board order, 00-132 _e rna Operations Coirnmi ttee 23, 1977 Paze 2 UK PROGRAM r which, mould permit us to shift the charge for all of these overhead costs to their appropriate programs. Colulmn Iii labeled direct costs represents payments made to providers (:_hat is people actually providing the In-Home Care services to our clients) , th= actual cost of liability insurance, workmen's compensation, and Saci-,l Security for the providers, the cost of fair hearings attributable to tat_- In-i✓:ome Care program, and the cost of our contract with the Bank of Amiarlca who actflually make the provider payments for the County. These costs are actual costs which can be clearly identified as being attributable to the In-iiame Care program. Column V represents the total claim for the In'-Home Care program for each quarter. You will note that the costs generally are higher each quarter; again generally because of attrition in other Social Service prograns :which has resulted in an increased and perhaps unfair proportion of costs being assigned to the In-Home Care program. As attrition continues either the sta finq level in In-Home Care will be maintained and ,.,ore and more of the overhead costs will be assigned to this program or a freeze will ha;» to be placed on staff assigned to In-Home Care in order to stabilize these overread costs. Staff from the Social Service Department are available to answer any �u�s�ions you may have on either the fiscal or program aspects of the In-Home Care program. CLVM:clg Attach,;,znt cc: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator Robert E. Jornlin, Welfare Director Dr. Orlyn Wood, Health Officer 00-133 lvlicroN[mt:d viith board order Human Resources Agency November 23, 1977 COD r • C ' i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY IN-NOME CARE CLAIMING STATISTICS 0 1976-1977 a a t FY 1976-1977 -0 __ Quarter Percent % Group I Group II Direct Costs Total E L7- 0 1st 15.7 $ 239,585 $163,089 $ 867 ,889 $1 ,270,563 z 2nd 17.2 265,172 199,376 802,480 1 ,267,028 3rd 17.9 263,412 205,990 1 ,118,750 1 ,588,152 4th 18.3 274,573 201 ,453 1 ,325,852 1 ,801 ,878 TOTAL $1 ,042,742 $769,908 $4,114,971 $5,927,621 In -11-1.e Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 19 77 In the Matter of Proposed Family Stress Center. The Board on August 30 , 1977 having approved the County Budget for fiscal year 1977-1978 in which was included an appro- priation of $250,000 to be used for a proposed family stress center for the central county area; and The Board on August 2, 1977 and September 13, 1977 having requested the Director, Human Resources Agency, to prepare a comprehensive analysis and report on the provision of family and children's services in this County, and the Board on October 18, 1977 having reaffirmed the intended use of the $250,000 appropriated for the family stress center contingent upon receipt of a report from the Director, Human Resources Agency, describing the type of program to be conducted in the proposed center and how the activities of such a center would be coordinated with other family and children's services in the com.,-nunity; and The Board having now received, through the office of the County Administrator, a preliminary report dated November 21, 1977 from the Director, Human Resources Agency; and Board members having e:cpressed their views on the matter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said preliminary report is ACKNOWLEDGED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that staff is AUTHORIZED to proceed as rapidly as possible with further actions toward implementation of the family stress center program with the understanding that the $250,000 appropriated in the budget is available as required but that legal requirements relating to County purchase of property will apply. PASSED by the Board on November 29 , 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board or Welfare Director Supervisors Medical Director affixed this 29th day of No ember 1977 Health Officer MH Director Contracts Unit J. R. O!_SSO�I, Clerk Teen Hope, Junior League, By c-=41.2 I.f1Deputy Clerk Task Force--Mrs. Laubscher Jamie L. Johnson Public Works Director County Administrator County Auditor-Controller County Counsel 001 3 5) H-24 4/77 15m Human Resources A genc ,f b y DateNovember 21 , 1977 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Arthur G. Will RECr'IVED To County Administrator 767 From C. L. Van arter, Director / 16717 J. R. OLSSON CLER X10 : SUPER ISORS Subj REPORT TO THE BOARD ON PROPOSED STA FAMILY STRESS CENTER IN CONCORD s � ' ''"""""'"'""""""""""""'"""'De You will recall as a part of the final adoption of the County Budget for this year that the Board of Supervisors appropriated x;250,000 to be used for the purchase of a facility which would become a family stress center for the Central County area. This money was made available contingent upon my filing a report with the Board of Supervisors describing the type of program which will be conducted in such a center and how the center would be coordinated with other family and children's services in the community. More recently, on October 18, the Board of Supervisors reaffirmed the intended use of this money at the request of Supervisor Boggess. Almost immediately upon the Board's appropriating funds for this purpose, I convened a Task Force to assist me in the preparation of the required report to the Board. This Task Force included a wide variety of County department staff and representatives from private agencies and volunteer organizations concerned with family and children's services generally and family stress in particular. This Task Force also included representatives from each of the major groups which had advanced proposals to the Board for revenue sharing funds. These included the Junior League, the Teen Hope Foundation, Inc. , the Social Service Department on behalf of the Edgar Children's Shelter, and the Child Abuse Prevention Council . The Task Force has met on four occasions to date in an effort to resolve any differences of opinion between the major participants, ensure that the proposed family stress center would include those services felt essential for the effective operation of such a center, and ensure close linkage and cooperation with the other principal family services in the Central County area. The attached chart is our attempt to diagram the types of services likely to be located in such a facility and the types of services with which linkage must be maintained. On November 29 the Task Force will continue their work on these linkages. At the same time, the Junior League has been exploring various building sites and has located a building in Concord which they believe could be used for the family stress center. The building is presently occupied by the Concord Christian Center and is located at 2449 Pacheco Street, Concord. A valuation analysis has been conducted by the Public Works Department. A more detailed evaluation of the exact condition of the building needs to be conducted. The Public Works Department has several concerns, particularly relating to the need for a termite inspection, a thorough evaluation of the condition of each of the buildings, and other related concerns. A. G. Will , Administrator November 21 , 1977 Page 2 REPORT TO THE BOARD ON PROPOSED FAMILY STRESS CENTER IN CONCORD It is also likely that.a use permit will be required from the City of Concord, particularly if any portion of the property is used for overnight housing of battered women, for instance, or otherwise is used on a 24-hour basis. Representatives from the City of Concord have been contacted and have indicated that such a use permit would not be required if the projected use of the building does not intensify the level of use already made by the church. This would include an evaluation of such things as the number of cars in the area, the number of staff and clients on site at any one time, and the hours of the day and night during which the facility would be used. Since it seems likely that the program we will be proposing will intensify the use of the property, we must consider the possibility of a use permit hearing. Since this would clearly be a condition which must be cleared before the County could consider buying the property, the need for and our ability to obtain a use permit must be made a condition of purchase. The several concerns which the Public Works Department has must also be considered contingencies on any offer the County would make. However, many of these issues cannot be resolved nor can final plans be made regarding the exact program which will be operated in the center until we have a fairly firm idea of where the center will be located. At this time, the Task Force I appointed has identified the services that should be made available to families in stress. These include: 1 . Parenting/Reparenting 2. Counseling 3. Information and Referral 4. Respite Care 5. Homemaker Services 6. 24-Hour Hot Line Ideally, all of these services would be located in the family stress center. Most of these services are currently being provcded by public and/or private agencies. The Task Force has identified the agencies that presently provide these services and I have requested preliminary commitments from those agencies regarding their willingness to relocate into the stress center and to give us their support for the proposal . The Task Force has identified the following necessary components for a stress center: 1 . Services to be located at the stress center. Some of these would be provided by professional staff hired by the Junior League. The services provided would include individual family and group counseling and coordination of multi-disciplinary teams. Other services to p' located in the center would include services provided by volunteers under the supervision 00137 A. G. Will , Administrator November 21 , 1977 Page 3 REPORT TO THE BOARD ON PROPOSED FAMILY STRESS CENTER IN CONCORD 1 . cont'd of professional staff, such as a 24-hour not line, crisis intervention, parenting/reparenting training, and information and referral. 2. Those services that are necessary elements of a stress center but which appear to be unavailable in this County at this time due to a lack of funding. These would include family homemakers, emergency transportation, and adequate facilities for runaway teenagers. 3. Those services currently being provided by professionals in public or private agencies which might be relocated into the stress center if space is available. These would include a child abuse coordinator, family protective services, mental health services, and sexual treatment services. 4. Those services provided by public and/or private agencies which would not be located in the facility but which require that linkages be developed. These would include emergency medical care services, respite care, legal assistance, substance abuse, etc. Final decisions on these programs and our ability to develop linkages are dependent at this time on our being sure where the center will be located and how much space will be available. It is my understanding that preliminary discussions are already underway with the owners. If it appears that further discussions will be productive, I understand that a request will be made to the Board of Supervisors to authorize formal negotiations for the purchase of the property. If those negotiations are successful then the Public Works Department will return to the Board with a report outlining the purchase price and conditions of purchase. The Board would then be asked to approve a "No tice of Intent to Purchase". At the conclusion of thirty days the Board's offer would be considered firm and the property would go into escrow. It is important that these steps proceed as quickly as possible so all of us are clear as to whether the property under discussion will be purchased or whether we should look elsewhere. From our discussions with your staff, I understand that no further formal action is required by the Board at this time. I would request, however, that this status report be filed with the Board at their meeting on November 29. CLVM:clg Attachment 00138 .GCATED 1/V FAMILY STRESS C[NIrR BOLI R L9 DIRECTOR Emergency Resplte� Family and Individual — BY PROI-ESS1eNAL S Care Counsellnq I M D C'S FarChildrenI 'Croup •Case�u_,, I • BY VOL UNTL'ERS AOVOCA C Y Parent Support I R rPahentEducaton Parentnq Support Crisrr Intervention. Parent Support ( LCDUIVSEL//k/16 ParentEducatlon CARE cE"TEP 0vireach 'Prent Arden Ser%Ices S�iF-Hel Gro,. s - - --- —_' J ClllLGRf1IS CGlIIClL „'--- - — -- --- - - - — �• ., :— p P.._ ;TPIA"v C,^'ifi/1011 JUlilOR LFAGGr o+G! ?LE6rl': -WECENTER •(LIRE MIL1,TR CARE Cflll'Er?-NOTUFlf fi £ ',!:','TES CAPC CIRECTOR ;HG /.!/il r•�?S l --,I CH/LD ABUSE RESP/TE 1 --' ----, SEX L ABUSE 41111- TAL�' r SER'✓/CES LOCATED A10VOC�C Y I PROTECTIVE POLICE ► ( FOSTCR ", r f�c3 c •lulE!•;L: rJlrrcE COORDINATOR CARE ,TREh7l✓,'ENT HEALTH , /SIDE OF CEiVT rR TO �• �r , . • . ,F SERVICES I SERV/CES , I CA i fll+l�RElJ, .,uICJC JR LEA6J_ CEs� •t�i0l.!EPJ I I E p _F .r,APC l-- __�J LPROGRAIX SCPVIC S +JE CODROI�I/iI LD •TEE/Jl' PSDE T %iiJ/CE 'EP% 'C:✓.!liy I 0 Y •E._. C.HJLDFrAJ •ED/•AR SNCLTel? ( T '�J •BATTERED WG.�i�EN "COLI il; Nf;-:h' r-- r '_S_HR ER __ EMfRGE>'�CY ----. •PRl/A;f. SEROUS -- ` APPP►OPl— ATE REGISTRY OF , ;RLL:S,J.;Y (E►ITER ; CPISIS I F I TEEN JIc�E IIITERVfN l>f L+' CAL l HEALTH ABUSE i_____..____ _j FOOD � .� � ,:,,.:, SERV/CES CASES ff�£RctOME ForrER T/G,N SERV/CSS MIRVICES r - -- :tl�9PLGf1�:.- 71 HOMES _ SUBSTAI'►�CE — +- � •VOLUNTEER 'CARE CEJJTER � � ABUSE , ���I�/CL i •i6LJll.•f.C4:'lCE .�r +� L.. .__..___-•-.. •16�V@LU.+VZEP •E,ti,_n.h,1FliA..S � •P/.16:!YCD I'.tFf,1'T.!4^OJ frEALTH DEPT. •CIAW ABUSE COORDINATOR •toL1CF •LIED SOC.SIRV/CE TRIATIVENT •TEf.N46i PAYU •C&.,W P,'JYSlCIAA'S •A05ATlC1! GISCc.i fY CL?'TC•�i v}.?S •NO•AA•rlW'-'l,Y REVEAITION- — -- -- —� > — -- -- --- =-CRISIS IA/TER�l1EI�ITIGN > -- — — ---=> — L ;lr, TER:+,1 ca ca IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX—OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY In the matter of Approving ) Position Statement on SB 346 ) November 29, 1977 (Peripheral Canal Legislation) ) The Public Works Director having this day submitted a draft of the position statement on Senate Bill 346 (Ayala) , including recommended amendments, for presentation at the November 30, 1977 hearing before the Senate Assembly Conference Committee in San Francisco, California (a draft of the position statement being attached hereto as Exhibit A) ; and The Board having discussed the proposed statement, and Supervisor N. C. Fanden having urged deletion of that portion of the statement entitled "Relocation of the Contra Costa Canal Intake" (set forth on Page 5 of Exhibit A) , commenting that at the November 22, 1977 meeting she had objected to that being included in the proposed amendments, but, in the interest of time, she had agreed to its inclusion in the draft only because she had been assured that the matter would again come before the Board this day at which time she would have an opportunity to request its deletion; and Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having expressed the view that relocation of the intake valve would assure delivery of an adequate supply of reasonable quality water which is vital for both county residents and industry, and having urged that the position statement as drafted by the Public Works Director be approved in its entirety; and Supervisor Fanden having asked Mr. Jack Port, Executive Secretary of the Contra Costa County Water Agency, whether in his opinion relocation of the canal intake would be in the best interest of the county, and Mr. Port having responded that the relocation proposal would not be consistent with the position taken by the Board to date, and further, inasmuch as the ,'pater District has never taken the position that the intake should be moved, it would seem to be inappropriate for the Board of Supervisors to propose same; and Mr. A. G. Will, Couift T Administrator, having commented that it might be well to note that ars article in the November 24, 1977 Contra Costa Times indicates that the Water District has acknowledged that it may find it necessary to consider moving the intake; and Supervisor R. I. Schroder having suggested that the Board should let it be known that it be known it would cooperate with the Water District if it desired to move the intake; and Supervisor Boggess having commented that the position of the Water District was not before the Board at this time; and Supervisor Fanden having recormended that the Board adopt its position statement as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto, thus eliminating any reference to the relocation of the canal intake; and 00.140 Board members having further discussed the matter, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Fanden is APPROVED and the testimony to be presented at said hearing is to be as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, R. I. Schroder, W. N. Boggess. NOES: Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine. ABSENT: None. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November, 1977. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK A. JOSEPH, Deputy Clerk cc: Public Works Department Environmental Control County Counsel County Administrator ��)141 DRAFT FOR BOARD APPROVAL NOVEMBER 23, 1977 Before the RECEIVED SENATE/ASSEMBLY CONFERENCE COMMITTEE NOV .,L9 1977 on SENATE BILL 346 (AYALA) J.. R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CO IRA COSTA CO. B ......._ ... ..........._...Deputy 47 POSITION STATEMENT of the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY NATER AGENCY November 30, 1977 San Francisco, California Contra Costa County's opposition to SB 346 (Ayala) stems from provisions in the Bill which would permit the delivery of greater amounts of Northern California waters to customers in San Joaquin Valley and Southern California at the expense of protection and enhancement of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Francisco Bay. In short, the Bill, if passed, would pave the way for greater Delta exports south with concommitant reductions in fresh water flows in and through the Delta and into San Francisco Bay. It is these fresh water flows more than any other single physical factor that determine the well-being of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuarine System (Bay-Delta System) . Usually called "Delta Outflows" or "Bay Inflow," these flows afford uses of the Bay-Delta waters by agriculture, by municipalities, and by industry. Additionally, the waters of the Bay-Delta System serve as a migration route and nursery ground for the very valuable anadromous fishery (salmon, striped bass, steelhead, American shad and sturgeon) which, in turn, supports a thriving recreational industry in the Bay-Delta area. PRESENTED BY SUPERVISOR 1%TARREN N. BOGGESS, CHAIRIMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, AND SUPERVISOR ERIC H. HASSELTINE, ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY. 00142 EMM7 A Microfilmed with board ordK In more specific terms, Contra Costa County's opposition to Senate Bill 346 (Ayala) is based upon the following five major points: • Inclusion of the Peripheral Canal in the Bill, • Relocation of the Contra Costa Canal Intake is made contingent upon construction of the Peripheral Canal, ??? (See page 5) • No recognition of the need for additional study to determine the effect of "Delta Outflows" on the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuarine System (Bay-Delta System) "and the relationship between such outflows and water quality standards, • Is silent on "limitation" of Delta exports, and • Does not provide for governmental separation between the state agency responsible for regulating water quality standards and the state agency operating the State Water Project. The remainder of our statement discusses each of these points in more detail and is written with the thought in mind that our discussion could provide a basis for possible amendments to the Bill. Furthermore, the basicrep mise behind these amendments should be that no construction of any state or federal water project be authorized until such time as the scientific and technical investigation, which we will be discussing later in this statement, has been completed, and findings incorporated into standards. INCLUSION OF THE PERIPHERAL CANAL The inclusion of the Peripheral Canal, as one of the projects which would be authorized for construction under the provisions of SB 346, is the principal reason why Contra Costa County opposes the Bill. Unless this project, which threatens severe damage to the Bay-Delta System, is eliminated can this county, in any way, even consider supporting the Bill. The Peripheral Canal has the potential for controlling virtually the intire regimen of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. For example, we now know that the Department of Rater Resources is planning to operate the 00,14.3 -2- Peripheral Canal with drastic reductions in Delta Outflows not only in "average years" but, more importantly, in "dry/critical years" as well. , Operation Studies submitted in the Phase II Hearings on the Delta Water Quality Control Plan before the State Water Resources Control Board show this quite clearly. Further in this regard, it has been our contention over the years that the so-called "surplus waters" in the Delta have never been quantified. In other words, knowledge is simply not available which would permit an intelligent decision as to how much Delta water can be diverted to San Joaquin Valley and Southern California and still not impair the environmental and economic integrity of the Delta and the Bay. It has been known for many years that reductions in Delta Outflows will severely affect municipal, agricultural and industrial water uses in the Delta as well as the fishery and wildlife habitat. What is not so well known is that degradation could also occur to the San Francisco Bay as well. In this connection, Contra Costa County retained the firm of J. B. Gilbert and Associates, Planning and Engineering Consultants, to conduct a study on the "Effects of Outflow from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta on the Quality of San Francisco Bay" (Gilbert Study) . The following are excerpts taken from Chapter II of their study, prepared for the Contra Costa County Water Agency, entitled "Principle Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation": "l. Of all the data available on the characteristics of Delta_ outflow and San Francisco Bay, little has been, or can be, used to determine in a quantitative manner the effects of Delta outflow on the quality/ of San Francisco Bay. 52is information has been developed by various governmental agencies and scientific investigators in response to their specific interests and objectives, which have been directed to either characterizing the quantity and quality of Delta outflow or characterizing the quality of San 1 ,ancisco Bay, not to relating the two. Host of the inquiry has been directed toward specific aspects or interactions among the -3- 00144 physical, chemical, and biological factors constituting the overall quality of San .Francisco Bay, and, in general, has not related observed or presumed effects in a quantitative manner to amount or quality of Delta outflow. (Emphasis added) 112. Substantial effects of planned reductions in Delta outflow on the physical and chemical character of San Francisco Bay can be quantitated and have been demonstrated, but the effects of these physical and chemical changes on the biota in the San Francisco Bay system are beyond quantification at the present time due to insufficient data and knowZedge. Statements of knowZedgeable individuals on the expected effects Of 2,educed DeZta outfZows on the biota in an Francisco Bay are generally conjectural, and sometimes conflicting. " (Emphasis added) Further on this point, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) have found in their study of the Bay, and stated in their "Progress Report for the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN," the following: "Fresh water coming from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta affects the bay system except south of Dumbarton Bridge. Change in delta outfZow--in its quality or in the way the flow fZuctuates--could have serious effects on the Bay. " ABAG has also concluded, as a result of their study, that: "By far the most significant source of fresh water to the Bay is the outflow from the Delta. All other sources are small in comparison. " All our discussion has centered on the planned reductions in Delta Outflows that would result if the Peripheral Canal were constructed. Other shortcomings of the Canal of equal importance can be mentioned. In general, it can be stated that the Department of Fish and Game has not demonstrated and have admitted they cannot say for certain the Canal will protect the Delta fishery; ostensibly, a function of the project. We-can list several problems which the Canal would create which have never existed before in the Delta with respect to the spawning of striped bass and the migration of salmon, both upstream and downstream. 00145 -4- In the interest of time, we will only emphasize what is probably the most striking operational difficulty and which may very well be insurmountable, i.e., the so-called fish screening device proposed to be installed at the head of the Canal; about 6,000 feet long. Moreover, our biological experts have informed us that the Peripheral Canal, as presently proposed, would be highly detrimental to the Delta fishery. Summarily stated, the proposed Peripheral Canal is the means with which Delta Outflows would be seriously reduced and the environment irreparably harmed. Therefore, any legislation, such as SB 346, which provides for construction of this facility, can , receive nothing less than outright opposition from Contra Costa County. O RELOCATION OF THE CONTRA COSTA CANAL INTAKE EDITORIAL NOTE: Supervisor Fallen seriously objected to this "point" at the Board Meeting on November 22, Z977; pointing out that if the Delta is fully and adequately protected there wouZd be no need to move the Canal Intake. It is our opinion that whether the Peripheral Canal is authorized or not authorized the Contra Costa Canal Intake should be relocated in order to ensure a reliable quality of water to the 250,000 people in Contra Costa County who are dependent on this supply. Numerous industries in our county are also dependent on this supply, particularly in the "dry/ critical years." Contra Costa County Water Agency totally supports the Contra Costa County Water District in any effort they wish to make in providing for relocation of the Intake. We reiterate the contingent condition that relocation of the Intake should not go hand in hand with construction of the Peripheral Canal. -5- 00146 • ADDITIONAL STUDY OF THE BAY-DELTA SYSTEM We stated earlier that there is not sufficient technical and scientific information upon which to reach an intelligent decision on the amount of fresh water needed to hold back ocean waters in the Delta and for flushing of San Francisco Bay. In this regard, the "Gilbert Study" came up with the following recommendation: "Based on the findings and conclusions, it is recommended that a comprehensive scientific and technical investigation be conducted to ascertain the effects of freshwater outflows from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta on the quality of the San Francisco Bay estuary, including, but not limited, to the effect of outflows on the ecology and the economic value of the San Francisco Bay-DeZta system. "The investigation should focus on the relationship between the magnitude of Delta outflows, with particular emphasis on the requirements for high outflows, and the protection and maintenance of a desirable biological food chain, fishery habitat, and wildlife habitat. Moreover, the investigation should result in a recommendation on the quantities of monthly, or at least seasonal, Delta outflows needed to adequately protect both the natural water-oriented resources and the economic resources of Sam Francisco Bay and the Delta. " We believe that such an investigation as recommended in the "Gilbert Study" should: 1. Be administered by agencies not directly involved in the sale of or purchase of water. 2: Provide for participation of the various Bay Area and Delta interests, 3. Fully recognize that the Delta and the Bay are, in fact, one integral estuarine body of water, 4. Be a comprehensive scientific and technical investigation which would ascertain the effects of fresh water flows (Delta Outflows/Bay Inflows) , including "flushing flows" on the economic uses of the waters as well as the ecology and environment of the entire Bay-Delta System. 0014.7 -6- S. Focus on the relationship between the magnitude of Delta Outflows and the well being of the fishery habitat, biological food chain and wildlife habitat, 6. Result in a recommendation on minimum Delta Outflows needed to adequately protect both the economic and natural water oriented resources of San Francisco Bay and the Delta. With respect to the administration of the investigation, we would offer as a possible institutional arrangement a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency representative of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and the Delta Advisory Planning Council. Another possibility could be a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency representative of the BCDC and the various Delta counties. Upon completion of the investigation, the investigation should become subject to proceedings for the purpose of adopting standards designed to protect and enhance the entire Bay-Delta System. The proceedings shall consist of full public hearings providing for direct testimony and evidence submitted by expert witnesses and for cross examination of these witnesses by all interested parties. An amendment to the Bill designed to provide for this investigation is, therefore, highly recommended and should have to be written into the Bill. • "LIMITATION" ON DELTA EXPORTS As pointed out earlier, the well being of the Bay-Delta System is highly dependent on adequate Delta Outflows. It is therefore entirely logical that an amendment be included in the Bill requiring the Department of Water Resources to "limit" their export of Delta water south to San Joaquin Valley and Southern California to at least the amount exported during the Dater Year 1975-76. -7- 0014.8 We have good reason to believe that significant amounts of planned export of Delta waters may very well be, in fact, "non- surplus waters." In other words, they may be needed to fully protect the Bay-Delta System. More importantly, .once these exports start going south, they, in all probability, will be lost forever. It is, therefore, recommended that the Bill be amended to provide for limitation of Delta exports as outlined above. • GOVERNMENTAL SEPARATION OF DWR AND SWRCB For many years, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) has been an arm of the Resources Agency as has the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) . Over the years, since 1971, since the landmark Water Rights Decision D-1379 was issued by the State Water Resources Control Board, we have seen a -relentless lowering of Delta Water Quality Standards. Also, quite clearly, the State Water Project (SWP) is presently an operating utility no different than the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, or the Southern California Edison Company. For the above reasons, regulation of the SWP should come from an entirely separate agency, and we, therefore, recommend SB 346 be amended to reflect this concept of separation. Two suggestions in this regard are being offered, the first being: All functions relating to the SWP, including, but not limited to, administration, operation, maintenance and construction, shall be withdrawn from the Resources Agency and the Department of Water Resources and be transferred to a new agency which could be designated the "State Water Utility," and The second suggestion being: The existing State Water Resources Control Board be reconstituted as the State Water Authority, which Authority established as an -8- ��1149 independent agency of state government, shall take responsibility for all existing functions of the State Water Resources Control Board. In addition to said functions, the Authority shall have total regulatory powers in connection with the operation of the State Water Project. In conclusion, we urge the Conference Committee not rush this important Bill. Pushing ahead with this proposed legislation will not alleviate the present drought situation; nor should the drought situation be used as an excuse to do so, since drought situations are ephemeral. In this regard, we are most willing to sit down with the Conference Committee and work out amendments on the Bill. The opportunity to present our views on this very important Bill is very much appreciated and we do thank you for giving us the time. -9- 00'150 RECEIVED NOV dc) 1977 Before the SON JOINT SENATE/ASSEMBLY CONFERENCE -CO]NMITTELB J. R. OF SUP � LERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CO T COSTA CO. putyon ........... .. ._.. .._ ....-_.De SENATE BILL 346 (AYALA) POSITION STATEMENT of the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EATER AGENCY November 30, 1977 San Francisco, California Contra Costa County's opposition to SB 346 (Ayala) stems from provisions in the Bill which would permit the delivery of greater amounts of Northern California waters to customers in San Joaquin Valley and Southern California at the .expense of protection and enhancement of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Francisco Bay. In short, the Bill, if passed, would pave the way for greater Delta exports south with concommitant reductions in fresh water flows in and through the Delta and into San Francisco Bay. It is these fresh water flows more than any other single physical factor that determine the well-being of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuarine System (Bay-Delta System) . Usually called "Delta Outflows" or "Bay Inflow," these flows afford uses of the Bay-Delta waters by agriculture, by municipalities, and by industry. Additionally, the waters of the Bay-Delta System serve as a migration route and nursery ground for the very valuable anadromous fishery (salmon, str}ped bass, steelhead, American shad and sturgeon) which, in turn, supports a thriving recreational industry in the Bay-Delta area. PRESENTED BY SUPERVISOR 1%'AltREN N. BOGGESS, CHAI%%M1 OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, AND ATTENDED BY SUPERVISORS t^ ERIC H_ HASSELTINE AND P;AINCY C. F,4JiDEN FOR .THE BOARD, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS EX OFFICIO GOl'EPLNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY. x()151 Microfilmed with boned order EM D f " 9 In more specific terms, Contra Costa County's opposition to Senate Bill 346 (Ayala) is based upon the following major points: o Inclusion of authorization of the Peripheral Canal in the Bill, , O No recognition of the need for additional study to determine the effect of "Delta Outflows" on the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuarine System (Bay-Delta System) and the relationship between such outflows and water quality standards, O Is silent on "limitation" of Delta exports, and 0 Does not provide for governmental separation between the state agency responsible for regulating water quality standards and the state agency operating the State Water Project. The remainder of our statement discusses each of•these points in more detail and is written with the thought in mind that our discussion could provide a basis for possible amendments to the Bill. But, at thisop int, I wish to emphasize that our basic position is that no construction of any state or federal water project be authorized until such time as the scientific and technical investigation, which••t.e will be discussing later in this statement, has been completed and findings incorporated into standards. O INCLUSION OF THE PERIPHERAL CANAL The inclusion of the Peripheral Canal, as one of the projects which • would be authorized for construction under the provisions of SB 346, is the principal reason why Contra Costa County opposes the Bill. Unless this project, which threatens severe damage to the Bay-Delta System, is eliminated, this county cannot even consider supporting the Bill. The Peripheral Canal has the potential for controlling virtually the entire regimen of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. For example, we now know that the Department of l.'ater Resources is planning to operate the -2- 0015 Peripheral Canal with drastic reductions in Delta Outflows not only in , "average years" but, more importantly, in "dry/critical years" as well., Operation Studies submitted in the Phase II Hearings on the Delta Nater Quality Control Plan before the State Water Resources Control Board show this quite clearly. Further in this regard, it has been our contention over the years that the so-called "surplus waters" in the Delta have never been quantified. In other words, knowledge is simply not available which would permit an intelligent decision as to how much Delta water can be diverted to San Joaquin Valley and Southern California and still not impair the environmental and economic integrity of the Delta and the Bay. it has been known for many years that reductions in Delta Outflows will severely affect municipal, agricultural and industrial water uses in the Delta as well as the fishery and wildlife habitat. {.'hat is not so well known is that degradation could also occur to the San Francisco ( Bay as well. In this connection, Contra Costa County retained the firm of J. B. Gilbert and Associates, Planning and Engineering Consultants, to conduct a study on the "Effects of Outflow from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta on the Quality of San Francisco Bay" (Gilbert Study) . The following are excerpts taken from Chapter II of their study, prepared for the Contra Costa County Water Agency, entitled "Principe Findings and Conclusions and Recommendation": "Z. Of aZZ the data available on the characteristics of DeZta outflow and San F�ancisco Bari, ZittZe has been, or can be, used to determine in a quantitative manner the effects of DeZta outflow on the quality, of San Francisco Bay 'This information has been developed by various governmentaZ agencies and scion tific investigators in response to their specific interests and objectives, which have been directed to either claracrtc:_-i:s rrg the quantity and quaZity of DeZta outfZow or characterizing the quality of Sar. Francisco Bay, not to relating tyre t-oc. Aost of the inquiry has been directed toward specific aspects or interactions among the 00153 physical, chemicaZ, and biological factors constituting the overall quality of San Francisco Eau, and, in general, has not related observed or presumed effects in a quantitative ' manner to amount or quality of Delta outflow. (Emphasis added) "2. Substantial effects of planned'rea'UcGions in Delta outflow on the physical and chemical character of San Francisco Bay car, be quantitated and have been demonstrated, but the effects of these phz,sicaZ and chemical changes on the biota in the San Francisco Bay system are beyond quantification at the present Limadue to insufficient data and knowZedge. Statements of knotiZedgeable individuals on the crpected effects of reduced Delta ou r ours ons e Vio to sn .,an Francisco Baia are r<eneraZZy conjectural, and sometimes conflicting. " (Emphasis added) Further on this point, the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) have found in their study of the Bay, and stated in their "Progress Report for the DRAFT ENVIRONAfENTAL MNIAGEMENT PLAN," the following: "Fresh water coming from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta affects the bay system except south of Dumba,ton Bridge. Change in delta outfZow--in its quality or in the way the flora fZuctuates--could have serious effects on the Bay. " ABAG has also concluded, as a result of their study, that: "By far the most significant source of fresh water to the Bay is the outflow from the Delta. All other sources are small in comparison. " All our discussion has centered on the planned reductions in Delta Outflows that would result if the Peripheral Canal were constructed. Other shortcomings of the Canal of equal importance can be mentioned. In general, it can be stated that the Department of Fish and Game has not demonstrated and have admitted they cannot say for certain the Canal will protect the Delta fishery; ostensibly, a function of the project. We can list several problems which the Canal would create which have never existed before in the Delta with respect to the spawning of striped bass and the migration of salmon, both upstream and downstream. -4- �f)154 In the interest of time, we will only emphasize what is probably the most striking operational difficulty and which may very well be insur- mountable, i.e. , the so-called fish screening device proposed to be installed at the head of the Canal; about 6,000 feet long. In a very recent study, Dr. Fred H. Tarp, Ph.D. , presently on the faculty of Contra Costa College, pointed out numerous operational problems with the Peripheral Canal that have not been resolved with respect to coordination of the export of Delta water with protection of the Delta fishery. His study, in particular, questioned the reliability of the work of the Department of Fish and Game on the "screening problem." Dr. Tarp had this to say in response to this statement of the Department. "The fish protective facility at the head of the Peripheral Canal would be designed using the most advanced knowledge and experience in the field.": "Unfortunately, to [kite, not much credence can be given to, nor much confidence gained from, such a statement. Instead, the history has been one of 'groping in the dark' and 'grasping for straws. ' The results of tests will not be available until Z978. Until then, we are asked to accept on faith that these ,model studies will lead to solutions, and have the added faith that model studies have much reliability in assessing the reality of the prototype. " (Dr. Tarp's Response) Summarily stated, the proposed Peripheral Canal would be highly • detrimental to the Delta fishery and is the means by which Delta Outflows would be seriously reduced, and the environment irreparably harmed. Therefore, any legislation, such as SB 346, which provides for construction of this facility, can receive nothing less than outright opposition from Contra Costa County. o ADDITIONAL STUDY OF THE BAY-DELTA SYSTEM We stated earlier that there is not sufficient technical and scientific information upon which to reach an intelligent decision on 00155 the amount of fresh water flow needed to hold back ocean waters in the Delta and for "flushing" of San Francisco Bay. For example: In one area alone, the occurrence of periodic massive "fish kills" in the Gay-Delta System has been subject to much speculation and conjecture. Actually, study of this serious degradation of the environment has been cursory and superficial. As yet, knowledge is lacking as to exactly what physical factor, or factors, play the critical role in these "fish kills." It may very well prove out that Delta Outflows are the controlling factor in this situation. Also: On "flushing" we would point out that millions of dollars have been spent by the various communities throughout the Bay Area and Delta on treatment facilities, as has private industry. IIo�,cver, significant amounts of pollutants enter the Bay-Delta System from surface runoff. The only way these pollutants can be eliminated from the System is by way of high Delta Outflows or "flushing flows." Exactly how much and when these "flushing flows" have to occur has yet to be ascertained. In this connection, the "Gilbert Study" came up with the following recommendation: "Based on the findings and conclusions, it is recommended that a comprehensive scientific and technical investigation be conducted to ascertain the effects of freshwater outflows from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta on the quality of the San Francisco Bay estuary, including, but not limited to, the effect of outflows on the ecology and the economic value of the San Francisco Bay-Delta system. "she investigation should focus on the relationship between the magnitude of Delta •outflows, with particular emphasis on the requirements for high ov_tf-lows, and the protection and maintenance of a desirable biological food chain, fishery habitat and wiZdZife i:ab tat. 1.'ore0ver, the investigation should result in a r.co^:rc.r_'a'ation on the quantities of monthly, or at least seasonal, DeZta outflows needed to adequately protect both the natural Yater-oriented resources and the economic resources of San Francisco Bay and the Delta. " 00156 -6- (" We believe that such an investigation as recommended in the "Gilbert Study" should: 1. Be administered by agencies not directly involved in the sale of or purchase of water, 2. Provide for participation of the various Bay Area and Delta interests, 3. Fully recognize that the Delta and the Bay are, in fact, one integral estuarine body of water, 4. Be a comprehensive scientific and technical investigation which would ascertain the effects of fresh water flows (Delta Outflows/Bay Inflows) , including "flushing flows" on the economic uses of the waters as well as the ecology and environment of the entire Bay-Delta System. a S. Focus on the relationship between the magnitude of Delta Outflows and the well being of the fishery habitat, bio- logical food chain and wildlife habitat, 6. Result in a recommendation on minimum Delta Outflows needed to adequately protect both the economic and natural water-oriented resources of San Francisco Bay and the Delta. With respect to the administration of the investigation, we would offer, as a possible institutional arrangement, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency representative of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and the Delta Advisory Planning Council. Another possibility could be a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency repre- sentative of the BCDC and the various Delta counties. Upon completion of the investigation, the investigation should become subject to proceedings for the purpose of adopting standards designed to protect and enhance the entire Bay-Delta System. The proceedings shall consist of full public hearings providing for direct 01)15"1 testimony and evidence submitted by expert witnesses and for cross examination of these witnesses by all interested parties. Financing of this investigation appropriately should come from federal and state funding, and a separate bill or an amendment to the Bill designed to provide for this investigation is highly recom- mended. "LIMITATION" ON DELTA EXPORTS As pointed out earlier, the well being of the Bay-Delta System is highly dependent on adequate Delta Outflows. It is therefore entirely logical that an amendment be included in the Bill requiring the Department of Yater Resources to "limit" their export of Delta water south to San Joaquin Valley and Southern California to at least the maximum amount exported during the Water Year 1975-76. We have good reason to believe that significant amounts of planned export of Delta waters may very well be, in fact, "non-surplus waters." In other words, they may be needed to fully protect the Bay-Delta System. More importantly, once these exports start going south, they are lost forever. It is therefore recommended that the Bill be amended to provide for limitation of Delta exports as outlined above. GOVERNMENTAL SEPARATION OF DWR AND SWRCB For many years the Department of Water Resources (DWR) has been an arm of the Resources Agency as has the State Water Resources Control' Board (SWRCB). Over the years, since 1971, when the landmark Water Rights Decision D-1379 was issued by the State Water Resources Control Board, we have seen a relentless lowering of Delta Water Quality Standards. Also, quite clearly, the State Water Project (SWP) is presently an operating utility no different than the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, or the Southern California Edison Company. _8- 00158 1 For the above reasons, regulation of the SWP should come from an entirely separate agency, and we, therefore, recommend SB 346 be amended to reflect this concent of separation. Two possible solutions in this regard are being offered, the first being: All functions relating to the SWP, including, but not limited to, administration, operation, maintenance and construction, shall be transferred from the Resources Agency and the Department of Rater Resources to a new agency which could be designated the "State Rater Utility," and The second suggestion being: The existing State Rater Resources Control Board be removed from the Resources Agency and be reconstituted as the State Rater Authority as an independent regulatory agency of state government with responsibility for all existing functions of the State Rater Resources Control Board. In addition to those functions, the Authority should have total regulatory powers in connection with the operation of the State Rater Project and other water projects in California. We understand that at the hearing held in Fresno, on Senate Bill 346, that suggested amendments have been submitted to the Joint Committee designated as the "Lehman/Zenovich Amendments to SB 346." We have not had the opportunity to study these suggested amendments in great detail. However, our hurried study indicates that the suggested changes would. erode what little protection exists in the current Bill. After further study, the Contra Costa County Water Agency may very well wish to submit added comments to your Committee on these suggested amendments. In conclusion, we urge the Conference Committee not rush this Bill. Pushing ahead with this proposed legislation will not alleviate the present drought situation; nor should the drought situation be used as an excuse to do so, since drought situations are ephemeral. In this regard, we are most wil? ing to sit down with the Conference Committee and work out amendments to the Bill. The opportunity to present our views is very much appreciated, and we do thank you for giving us the time. 00159 -9- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 2q , 79 Z-7— In the Matter of _. Proposed Reassessment of Funds, CETA Public Service Employr.;ent Program. The Board 'having received a November 16, 1977 letter from Mr. Ernest G. Green, Assistant Secretary for Employment and Training,U.S. Department of Labor, urging prime sponsors to reassess their Comprehensive Employment Training Act (CETA) Title II and Title VI program plans to ensure that there will be a maximum use of available funds to enable the CETA Public Service Employment Program to reach established goals; IT IS .BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said letter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency . PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977 . hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy or an order entered on the minW" of said Board.of Supervisors on the dats aforesaid. cc: D:e._ -,�..CtOr, Human uman Witness my hand and the Sea( of the Board of Resources Agency Supervisors County Administrator affixed this ?g;t, doy of T r 19 d. R. OLSSON, Clerk By j',,,s 7 �ti'-;��� _� '1 Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H—24 4/77 15m 00160 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on Appeal ) of Round Hill Property Owners ) Association, Inc. , from Planning ) November 29, 1977 Commission Approval of Tentative ) Map for Subdivision 4915, Alamo Area. ) Elbaco, Inc. , Owner. ) _ The Board on November 22, 1977 having closed the hearing on. the appeal of the Round Hill Property Owners Association, Inc. , from Planning Commission conditional approval of the tentative map for Subdivision 4915, Alamo area, filed by Elbaco, Inc. , and fixed this date for decision thereon; and Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having advised that staff had strengthened the proposed conditions of approval to insure protection of the ridgeline and that a report from the Public Works Department states that construction of a secondary access is not practical as a condition of approval since Biltmore Drive, with required pavement widening, and Royal Oaks Drive have sufficient capacity to carry the projected traffic load; and Supervisor Hasseltine having stated that Condition No. 24 requiring county approval of the location and design of all residen- tial buildings would be unduly restrictive, and having suggested that the wording be amended to apply to only those lots where con- struction might or could affect the ridgeline; and Supervisor Hasseltine having recommended that the appeal:. of Round Hill Property Owners Association, Inc. , be denied and that the tentative map for Subdivision 4915 be approved with revised conditions, subject to staff preparing a resolution identifying the specific lots to which the provisions of Condition No. 24 would apply; and Supervisor N. C. Fanden having stated that she could not support the recommendation inasmuch as she felt that the matter should be referred to the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission for -review and recommendation; and The Board members having discussed the matter and having found that the proposal is consistent with: a) the San Ramon Valley Area General Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on May 24, 1977, b) the zoning for the property and c) the character of the area, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Hasseltine is APPROVED and staff is DIRECTED to prepare a resolution for approval of the tentative map for Subdivision 4915 with revised conditions. PASSED on November 29, 1977 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, R. I. Schroder, E. H. Hasseltine, W. N. Boggess. NOES: Supervisor N. C. Fanden. ABSENT: None. CE+ti's:[ED COPY CC: Round Hill Property t rel-tifr t!tat tills !sa hdt. true & correct copy of Owners Assn. Inc. 'w nrlr!n,! c!ncun:rnt xicich t on file in my office. :nd cftat it {:as n;:a.P•l & ;,c;nptrd by the Board of e[ r•nt Elbaco, Inc. =::lc�rti::rt • r, ra Cnsta Cot:rtry. C.rttifnrnia, on Public Works the date sho•r:l, p:."1T.:7T: J. it. Of-$os. County Clerk 4ex-officio clerk of said Board of Supervisors, Land Development by De�-CA-rk. Building Inspection � Director of Planning ----- --- _..% .__. ott A? /9;77 County Counsel 00161 in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 fig 77 In the Matter of Report of the Planning Commission with Respect to Proposed Amendment . to the County Ordinance Code Pertaining to Title No. 9 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Director of Planning having filed with the Board the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the County Ordinance Code be amended as follows : Repeal Title No. 9 (Subdivision Ordinance) and reenact same in amended form to conform to the State Subdivision Map Act; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, January 3, 1978 at 11:00 a.m. , in Room 107, County Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk, pursuant to code requirements, publish notice of same in THE INDEPENDENT, ALJTIOCH DAILY LEDGER, and 'CONTRA COSTA TIMES. PASSED by the Board on November 29 , 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors affixed this 2gth day of Nnt►pmhAr 19= J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson 00162 H-24 4/77 15m LCLERX LVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2 z 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Or ZkRVISORS TA Co. r` TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 21 November 1977 Attn: Clerk of the Board i FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: Ordinance Code Amendment, Sub- Director of Plane' division Ordinance (Title #9 and re-enact- ment in amended form. Attached is Planningion Resolution 7#90-1977, adopted by the Planning Commiss- ion on Tuesday, Novembe 22, 1977. This amendment was heard by the Planning Cmnission on Tuesday, September 27, 1977, and was approved at that time by a vote of 5 AYES - 2 ABSENT (Compaglia & Stoddard). The purpose of this amendment is to repeal Title #9 of the Subdivision Ordinance and to re-enact the same in an amendedto modernize its provisions and conform them to theState Subdivision Map Act. "j AAD/v Attac2ments: Resolution, Ordinance Amendment, Staff Report, Minutes. cc: Subdivison Ordinance file. Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. 00163 ANcrotilmed with board order RESOLUTION NO. 90-1977 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO REGULATIONS ON SUBDIVISIONS OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Director of Planning having advised the Planning Commission that the Proposed Subdivision Ordinance for the County of Contra Costa is in need of revision, modification and additions, the Planning Department along with Public Works Department and County Counsel have reviewed and prepared an amending Ordinance to achieve the desired revisions, modifications and additions; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on this application on September 16, 1977; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof was lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, September 27, 1977, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, at the September 27, 1977 public hearing residents and merchants from the area did appear and spoke on this matter both in favor and in opposition; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that the recommendation of. the DIRECTOR OF PLANNING be APPROVED as to the modifications, and additions of the proposed changes of the SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE CODE AMENDMENT and that this change be made as indicated on the County Ordinance Code, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendation is as follows: (1) Reenact in amended form Title 9 in order to modernize its provisions and conform them to the State Subdivision Map Act. 0 0 1 C.1 Microfilmed with board/lordeld)) RESOLUTION NO. 90-1977 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Commission shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 22, 1977, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - WALTON, ANDERSON, YOUNG, PHILLIPS, MILANO. NOES: Commissioners - NONE. ABSENT: Commissioners - STODDARD, COMPAGLIA. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - NONE. I, Donald E. Anderson, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 22, 1977, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission. AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Phillips, Stoddard, Young, Compaglia, Walton, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. irman of the Planning Commission ofthe County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: S etary of the ping Commission of the aunty offColitra Co a, State of California 00165 -2- Microrkmed with board order CONI COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report f° . ., F XXX, Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency : : _• Contra Costa 'County = ' c/o'Planning -Department �-, P.O. Box 9s1 ; Martinez, California 94553 Phone (41S) 372-2024 Phone , g• EIR Contact Person Arnold Jonas Contact- Person =; PROJECT DESCRIPTION: S11BDIVISION ORDINANCE . .: Consideration of repeal of Title 9 of the County Ordinance 'Code'(Subdivision Ordin- ance and reenact in amended from Title 9 in order to modernize.lts provisions and.'.. = . conform them.to the State Subdivision I-lap Act. The Project Will Not Have A Significant Effect On The Environment /. It is an Ordinance Amendment only, applicable county-wide and non-specific in nature. The new provisions would become active upon their use in the evaluation of specific project applications, and any resulting environmental effects would be judged at that h time on a case by case basis: Due in great part to a legal obligation to conform the Local Subdivision Ordinanc- to the enabling; State Legislation, the .County is :. constrained to make most of.the changes. To not do so could result in constraints on development within the Cainty to the general public detriment. The general nature of the changes are to promote subdivisions incorporating enhanced 'environmental protection. a= :` It is determined from initial study by Arnold Jonas' of the _ XXX Planning Department that this project .does not.have a of •ee-Y{•yy4 _ ' 411�ti •- • effect on the environment, ; Justification for negative declaration is- attached. <<- The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets Martinez, California D It e Posted&MltUlt V0, Final date for review/appealtxsr� 2(0 ?:y y 001 n ?y~" Planning Departmen Representative of)1� Mao filmed with board order STAFF REPORT SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE CODE AMENDMENT: PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE To consider the repeal of Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code (Subdivision Ordinance) and reenact in amended form Title 9 in order to modernize its provisions and conform them to the State Subdivision Map Act. This staff report consists of the following: a) Draft of Title 9, Subdivision Ordinance (43 pages) b) Resume' -of Proposed Revisions to Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code c) Letter dated April 27, 1977 from the East Bay Chapter of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors d) Letter dated May 3, 1977 from the Associated Building Industry, Eastern Division e) Letter dated May 5, 1977 from the Soil and Foundation Engineers Association (and memo dated May 9, 1977 from Judd R. Hall) f) Negative declaration of environmental impact The draft Subdivision Ordinance has been prepared by the County. Counsel's Office, the Department of Public Works, and the Planning Department with the assistance and advice of other County departments, professional organizations, and individual engineers and surveyors. It reflects the specific requirements of the State Subdivision Map Act and the County's current subdivision policies. In addition, we have also made changes in the administrative procedures (especially in Division 920, Park Dedications, pages 38, •39 and 40) that clarify the process and reduce processing time. Specific differences between the existing Title 9 and the draft are listed in the resume' . STAFF RECOM1\1ENDATION That the Board .of Supervisors repeal the present Title 9 of the County Code and reenact in amended form Title 9 as attached and further amend as follows (these amendments are those suggested by the Soil and Foundation .Engineers Association and the County Geologist) (additions are italicized, deletions lined through) : Amend Section 92-4.010 to read as follows (page 2) : 92-4,010 Building Inspection Department. The "Building Inspection Department" is the county agency which serves in an advisory capacity to appropriate advisory agencies and the Board of Supervisors concerning topography and soil conditions and-geelegie-€eatuFes, and their effect on the design and development of the subdivision. (Ord. 77- ) Amend Chapter 92.4, Definitions, by adding the following definitions: Civil Engineer, "Civil engineer" means a professional engineer in the branch of civil engineering holding a valid certificate of registration issued by the state of California. Engineering Geologist. "Engineering geologist" means a professional geologist in the branch of engineering geology holding a valid certificate of registration as an engineering geologist in the state of California. 001 6 > Waojum-cs with gourd ordbr - Geologic hazard or potentially hazardous soil condition. Includes but is not limited to conditions such as slope stability, groundwater seepage, erosion hazards, expansive soil, fauZt-related hazards, and liquefaction potential. Amend Section 92-4.084 to read as follows (page S) : Soil Engineer. "Soil engineer" is a civil engineer who is experienced in soil mechanics, who investigates and reports on the stability of existing or proposed slopes, who controls the installation and compaction of fills, who recommends soil bearing. values, and who provides design criteria and calculations for special earth structures such as buttress fills. (Note: This definition is the same as in the County Grading Ordinance.) Amend Section 94-2.204(3)(A), Information Required, as follows (top of page 10) : . (A) The outline of existiRg-s}ides;-slips;-slump-areas; any geologic or potentially hazardous soil condition, and areas subject to inundation or ponding, Amend Section 94-2.206(2) to read as follows (p. 10-11) (additions are italicized, deletions lined through) : (2) Two copies of a preliminary geologic and/or soils. reconnaissance report, as required by the Planning Department. Each report of a geological investigation shall be prepared and signed by a-geelegist registered-iR-GalifeERia-and-eertified-iR-exgineepiRg-geelegy- an engineering geologist. Each report of a soil investigation shall be prepared and signed by a civil soil engineer. who-is-registered-iR GaliferRia-and-whe-is-experieReed-iR-sail-engiReeriRg: The required report should be based on the latest grading plan for the subject development and shall reference the date-of that grading plan. The format for required reports shall generally follow the guidelines for Geologic/Seismic reports required by the Planning Department. All reports shall include the following: (A) . A detailed geologic map showing the location and extent of any geologic hazard or potentially hazardous soil condition within or immediately adjoining the subject property which warrants special management and/or further evaluation. (e-g-;-landslide areas;-Fault-seRes;-seeps)- (B) Recommendations outlining an exploration program to fully define and delineate any geologic hazard or potentially hazardous soil condition, and to accurately identify developable areas. (C) Conclusions regarding the effect of geelegie/seismie-and-sails eenditieas any geologic hazard or potentially hazardous soil condition within or immediately adjoining the project site on the design of the proposed subdivision. (D) Recommendations for redesign of the subdivision and/or recommendations for construction procedures to mitigate potentially hazardous conditions, if warranted. Microtilmed with board order The requirement for a preliminary geologic or soils reconnaissance report may be waived if the Planning Department determines that there are no apparent hazardous geologic or soils conditions within, adjacent to, or affecting the subdivision, based upon the geotechnical knowledge the department possesses. For subdivisions of four lots or less there is no mandatory requirement for a preliminary geologic or soils reconnaissance report. Such a report may be required if the Planning Department determines that there are apparent hazardous geologic or soils conditions within, adjacent to, or affecting the subdivision. A-geelegist;-registered-iR-Gali€erRia-and-eerti€ied-iR-engineeriRg geelegy-er-a-eivil-engineer-wke-is-registered-iR-GaliferRia-and-wke-is experieReed-iR-seil-eRgiaeering; An engineering geoZogist, within or retained by Contra Costa County,, shall. evaluate the reports required herein and advise the body having jurisdiction and authority. Supplemental reports and data may be required if deemed necessary. 00169 Microtitmed with f'--,rt4 .. RESUME' OF PROPOSED REVISIONS TO TITLE 9 OF THE COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE CODE AMENDMENT: PUBLIC HEARING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE To consider the repeal of Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code Subdivision Ordinance) and reenact in amended form Title 9 in order 'to modernize its provisions and conform thein to the State Subdivision Map Act. DIVISION 92 92-2.002 No change. 92-2.001 Changes State Code reference Prow 111usiness and Professions Code to Government Code as provided by Senate Bill 977, Chapter 1536, Statutes of 1974. 92-2.006 (a) Changes State Code reference. (b) Deletes reference to parts of subdivisions. 92-4.002 No change. 92-4.001 New section. 92-4.006 through 92-4.013 No change. 92-4.020 New section, was part of 920-6.002. 92-4.022 through 92-4.036 No change. 92-4.0313 Requires that subdivision improvement plans be "prepared under the direction of" rather than "be submitted by" a registered civil engineer. 92-4.0,10 First sentence same; second sentence added to conform to new Plap Act. (66419 (a) and 66419 (b)) . 92-4.042 tlirough 92-4.056 No change. 92-4.08 Term "Minor Subdivision" defined; terra "Minor Subdivision Kip" de i e Led. The term "Ten td L i ve Hap" shall apply to subdivisions of all sizes , as in the Plap Act. 92-4.060 Same as old Section 92-4.030. 92-4.062 through 92-4.066 No change. 001 iU Miuofilmed with board order 92-4.owy, De f i•r i t i on expanded Lo include add i 1.i oua 1 flu t i es, 92-4.U;0 ho change. 92-4.072 Description of scope and foruf of report deleted from this section and added to 94-4.420. 92-4.074 through 92-4.086 No chanye. 92-4.Ok"18 Definition chanyed to conform to the new ial) Act (66423). 92-4.090 (a) Definition chanyed. All but the last sentence is a direct quote from the New i,'ap Pct (66424.) .. (b) Last sentence takes the place of old ,Ordinance 92-4.086 sub-paragraph (1 ). (c) Old sub-paragraph (?) now in second to last sentence of 92-4.090 and Map Act (66424) . (d) Old sub-paragraphs (3) and (4) superseded by Dial) Act (66412). (e) Old stab-paragraph (5) deleted from Ordinance. This has the effect that divisions into four or less lots in heavy industrial , light inclustrial , controlled nr,11urfacturiny, commercial , r•eLa i I business, neigh- borhood business or administraLive•office land use districts must yo through the subdivision process. 92-4.092 and 92-4.094 No change. 92-6.002 through 92-6.006 No chane. 92-8.UO2 and 92-8.004 No change. 92-10.002 Same as previous Ordinance 9.'-10.00,1. 92-10.004 New section. 92-10.006 New section. 92-12 This entire chapter is new. DIVISION 94 94-2 It is important to note that in the nevi-Ordinance the Tentative Hap Chapter applies to all subdivisions regardless of size. 94-2.202 No change in first sentence. The remainder of the - section is the four exceptions contained in old Article 9242-2.12 with no changes except in form. 001 'x1 -2 Microfilmed with board order i 94-2.204 Was 911-1.402. (a) Aft-m- "sheet:" iii first paragraph• Auld "unless prior written approval of the Planning Deparbeent is given for- more than one sheet." (b) In middle of sub-paragraph (3), new requirement that parcel be oriented on map such that north is toward top of uiap. (c) Sub-paragraph (3) (A) greatly expanded by inclusion of old Sections 910-4.006, 910-4.002, 910-4.016, 910-4.004 (changed to apply to Tentative claps for all. size sub- divisions), and 910-4.014. (d) Sub-paragraph (3) (F) is new. 94-2.206 'Mas 94-2.404. (a) Sub-paragraph (2). Description of requirements for geologic acrd/or- soils report described. Also, wording added to hermit Planning Department to waive site reconnaissance by soil engineer in tire case of subdivisions of 4 or less lots. Describes who will evaluate reports. (b) Sub-paragraph (4) . Wording added to permit Planning Department to waive preliminary grading and site development plan. 94-2.602 Was 94-2.604. Describes no. of tentative, maps required for subdivisions of 5 lots or more or 4 lots 'or less. 94-2.604 Was 94-2.606. Time deadlines changed to conform to new Map Act. 94-2.606 Was 94-2.6011. Time between filing and subdivision conference extended ten days. Subdivision conference made optional . Provides that subdivider must have conditions at least 3 ' calendar clays prior to hearing. Reviser) Tentative Maps must be received one creek 'prior to hearing rather than 2 working days. 94-2.608 1•las 94-2.610. No change. 942.610 tiew section. Most of information is from old Section 94-4.808. New provision for extension of two years. 94-2.802 Wording charmed. Same intent. 94-2.804 ilo change. 94-2.1306 New section. Added to conform to new Map Act (66413.5). 12' -3- mrrofilmod with board order 94-2. IUU2 Same inlenL emi.epl_ Lhat "ir,Larested persons, as provi clad in Sec:t i arr 26-2.?40,1" are added to possible appellants in accordance with new Hap Act (66452.5). 94-4 This ChapLer has been expanded Lo include Parcel Maps. 94-4.202 Wording added to reiterate portions of 66426 and 66428 of the new Map AcL. 94-4.204 Boundary designation changed from red line to 1/16" black line to be compatible with microfilminj. 94-4.206 New section. Includes old sections 91U-4:004, 910-4.010 and 910-4.006. 94-4.203 Was 94-4.206. Only change is requirrarrrent that subdivision number be larger and dominant to name title. 94-4.210 Was 94-4.2LI8. Basically the same. Requires black ink for signatures and seals. Provides for waiving Owner's Certificate on Parcel Maps. (This provision is for use in rare cases of unusual hardship only.) 94-4.212 Was 91-4.210. Same except requires bearings to be based on California Coordinate System, Zone III. 94-4.214 through 94-4.2'24 was 94-4.212 through 94-4.222. Ho change. 94-4.226 was 94-4.224. Old section 910-4.012 added. ' 94-4.402 Permits advisory agency to require Soil Report on Minor Subdivisions as permitted by now Map Act (66490). 94-4.404 Added wording to exempt private roads from guarantee period. 94-4.406 All new (a) Cash deposit changed from $500 to 1%, with a $1 ,000 minimum, except in the case of totally private improvements. (4) . Permits acceptable instrumenLs of credit as security. (c) Details on paymni t security moved Lo 94-4.408. -4- Microfilmed with board order 94-4.40:4 New sectiuii (eras of 94-4.406).- (a) Changes payment security from 100 percent to 50 percent. (b) Permits acceptable instruments of credit as security. 94-4.410 Changed to include new improvement plan review fee and other possible_ fees perriitted Icy new Map Act and to delete pa.yvient for street signs. 94-4.412 No change. 94-4.414 Requirement for subordination deleted. 94-4.416 New section (self-explaria tory). 94-4.418 Was 94-4.408. Same, except new version permits instruments of credit as security. 94-4.420 Was 94-4.416. Same, except most of old 92-4.066 has been inserted. 94-4.602 Same, except: (a) Fees changed from ordinance to resolution. (b) Four sets of prints required in accordance with current practice.. 94-4,604 and 94-4.606. No change: 94-4.802 Several changes to clarify, conform to new Map Act, and conform to current practice. (a) Combines old sections 94-4.802, 94-4.304 and 94-4.80b. (b) Iluu,ber of prints required changed to conforw to current practice. (c) Time limits changed to conform to new Map Act (66458) . (d) Provides for findings in accordance with new Map • Act (66473.5). (e) Provides that title company shall Irrovide Recorder witil blue line print on linen in accordance with current practice. (f) I,a-or ia;pact is that this processing will also apply to Parcel Maps under new ordinance. -5- (�1174 A 1! A ratiim2d with board order 94-4,1306 lla; 911-4 Samu!, except, new 94-7. .611-f allows two-year extension. 94-4.801 Utas 94-4.810. 1!o Otange. 94-4.810 Was 94-4.1312. 110 chane. DIVISION 96 96-2.202 through 96-2.206. No change 96-2.208 Wording added at end to require clual'ity appropriate to microfilm reproduction. 96-2.402 Changed to provide for submittal of preliminary estimate and an improvement plan review fee as estiblished by the Board. The current intent is to recommend to the Board a 1 percent fee. The fee is dodiactible from the inspection fee per section 96-4.208. 96-2.404 Same, except reduces required prints. 96-2.406 Sauce intent. Simplified. 96-2,403 and 96-2.410 flu change. 96-2.602 Mu charge. 96-4.202 through 96-4.206 ' 96-4.208 Changed to have fee set by resolution rather than ordinance and provide for deduction of plan review fee from inspection fee. 96-4.402 Flo change. 96-4.404 Changed to allow Public Works to grant a one-year extension without Bcard approval . 96-4.602 and 96-4.604. 110 change , 96-6.202 110 .change. 96-6'.204 Changed to apply to ail streets within one, mile of a school . 96-6.206 and 96-6.203. Ho change. 96-6.210 1•!as 96-6.220. No change. 96-6.212 Was 96-6.210. flo change. -6- 001` 5 k1crofilmed with board order 96-6.714 :'ITIS :64%.l i7_. Ito ch:►n11e. 96-6:216 No change. 96-6.210 Ho change. 96-6.220 Was 96-6.222. No change. 96-6.222 leas 96-6.224. No change. 96-6.402 Changed to include old section 96-6.214. 96-6.404 through 96-6.410 No change. 96-6.602 Application procedure changed to conform to current Practice. 96-6.60+1 [to change. 96-G.0'02 through 96-6.306 No change. 96-8.202 through 96-3.206 No change. 96-8.402 Changed to require sidewalks along all thoroughfares regardless of school location. 96-8.404 No change. 96-21.406 Changed to include mailboxes. 9G-8.408 Changed to conform to practice and County Standard Plans. ' 96-8.410 New section. 96-10.002 through 96-10.006. No change. 96-12.202 through 96-12.210 No change. 96-12.402 and 96-12.40,1 I(o change. 96-12.406 was 922-4.2104 subparagraph (5). No change. 96-12.602 No change. 96-14.002 and 96-14.004 No change. UIVISIO1I 98 93-2.002 through 98-2.012 Nu change. 98-2.014 Was 910-2.002. No change. 93-2.016 through 93-21.026. Was 98-2.014 through 93-2.024. Only change is addition of private roads in 93-2.022- 001 7lla -7- microfilmed with board order 98-4.002. Private roads added 93-4.004 and 98-4.00G (,to change. 98-6.002 Private roads and driveways added. 98-6.004 through 98-6.008 No change. - 98-6.010 and 98-6.012 Private roads added. 98-6.014 No .change. 98-6.016 Private roads added. 98-8.202 through 98-8.206. No change. 98-8.402 Private roads added, 98-10.002 and 98-10.006 No change. DIVISION 912 912-2.002 through 912-2.006 No change. 912-2.008 Was 94-4.418. No change. DIVISION 914 914-2.002 Changed to require all building sites above 100-year flood due to Federal Flood Insurance Program, 914-2.004 through 914-2.018 No change. 914-4.202 No change. 914-4.204 Changed to permit aluminum pipe, 914-4.206 No change. 914-4.402 through 914-4.408 No change. 914-4.602 Changed to permit aluminum pipe. 914-4.604 No change. 914-6.002 through 914-6.014 No change. 914-8.002 through 914-8.014 No change. 914-10 Revised to clarify the portions relating to drainage easements and to discontinue requirements for access easements where not needed or unimproved channels. 001 '11 -8- Kjdofilmed with board order 914-12.202 Ho change. 914-12. 102 Ho change. DIVISION 916 No chances. DIVISION 918 No changes. DIVISION 920 920-2.002 Code change 920-4.002 Preliminary and tentative added -- removed - added (public) 920-4.004 (Public) added 920-4.006 New section per Westman 920-6.002 First sentence deleted 920-6:004 Flat fee of $300 established 920-6.006 Deleted ($300 fee before) 920-8.002 Partial credit may be given up to 50 percent 920-8.004 Add criteria ;#6 920-12.002 last 2 sentences deleted 920-12.004 Add (initial) 920-12.006 (MISTAKE) Should be (Park Dedication Trust Fund) 920-12.008 (MISTAKE) Scratch Association 920-12.010 Delete 920-12.012 (a) Deleted (b) becomes (a) new (b) 920-12.014 (a) Deleted add or other natural disaster- OW 7s -9- Microfilm2d witin board order i UIl'1JtUi! 924 9211-2.002 and 924-4.7.07.. Changed lv include revei-simi by Parcel Map. 924-4.204 and 924-4.206. No change. 924-4.208 ChanUed code reference. 924-4.210 and 1924-11.212. No change. 924-4.214 vias 924-4.402. No change.. 00119 Acrofilmed with board order -10- Division 92 Chapter 92-4 a GENERAL PROVISIONS DEFINITIONS Chapters: Sections: 92-2 Title, Purpose and Scope P P 92-4.002 General 92-4 Definitions 92-4.004: Advisory agency 92-6 Exceptions 92-4.006 Arterial street 92-8 Conformance 92-4.008 Block 92-10 Administration and Enforcement 92-4.010 Building Inspection Depart- 92-12 Notices of Violation and.Certifi- ment cates of.Compliance 92-4.011 Civil Engineer 92-4.012 Collector street 92-4.014. County Chapter 92-2 92-4.016 Critically expansive soils TITLE, PURPOSE AND SCOPE 92-4.018 Cul-de-sac 92-4.020 Dwelling unit Sections: 92-4.021 Engineering Geologist 92-2.002 Title 92-4.022 Final Map 92-2.004 Purpose 92-4.024 Flood Control District 92-2.006 Scope 92-4.026 Flood hazard 92-4.028 Freeways 92-4.030 Frontage • 92-2.002 Title. This Title shall be 92-4.032 Frontage improvements known as the 'Subdivision Ordinance' of 92-4.034 Frontage road the County of Contra Costa. (Ord. 77- 92-4.035 Geologic hazard or poten- tially hazardous soil condi- tion 92-2.004 Purpose. This Title is enacted 92-4.036 Health Department for the purpose of adopting subdivision 92-4.038 Improvement plan 92-4.040 Improvements regulations in accordance withthe Sub- 92-4.042 Industrial street division Map Act, Division 2 of Title 7 of 92-4.044 Inundation the Government Code of the State of 92-4.046 Lot California, and repeals all other regula- 92-4.048 Major drainage channels or tions of the County of Contra Costa in conduits conflict with this Title provided, however, 92-4.050 Marginal strip that such repeal shall not affect any 92-4.052. Median agreement, contract, or bond executed 92-4.054 Minor drainage channels or pursuant to such regulations or any rights g conduits of action accruing thereunder. (Ord. 77- 92-4.056 Minor street 92-4.058 Minor Subdivision 92-2.406 Scope; Under the provisions of 92-4.060 Ordinance Specifications g2-4.062 Parcel Division 2 o Title 7 of the Government Code, State of California, referred to 92-4.064 Parcel Map herein as the Subdivision Map Act and, in 92-4.066 Path 92-4.068 Planning Department addition to any other regulation provided 92-4.070 Ponding of local storm by law, the regulations contained in this g water Title shall apply to all subdivisions here- 92-4.072 Preliminary soil report after made entirely or partially within the unincorporated territory of this county. 92-4.074 Private road (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.076 Public Street - 92-4.078 Public Works Department 00180 Microfilmed with board order 92-4.080, Secondary drainage chap- that area: bounded on all sides by the nels or conduits adjacent streets, rights-of-way, railroads, 92-4,082 Sheet overflow public areas, or subdivision boundary, and 92-4.084 Soil engineer includes one or more lots or parcels. 92-4.086 Street (Ord. 77- 92-4.088 Subdivider 92-4.090 Subdivision 92-4.010 Building Inspection Depart- 92-4.092 Tentative Map ment. The "Building Inspection Depart- 92-4.094 Thoroughfares ment' is the county agency which serves in an advisory capacity to appropriate 92-4.002 General. As used in this advisory agencies and the Board of Super- Title, the following words shall have the visors concerning topography and soil con- meanings set forth in this Chapter. (Ord, ditions and their effect on the design and 77- development of the subdivision. (Ord. 77- . 92-4.004 Advisory agency. The Plan- ning Commission is designated as the 92-4.011 Civil Engineer. "Civil Engi- advisory agency with respect to Tentative neer" means a professional engineer in the Maps relating to subdivisions of five or branch of civil engineering holding a valid more lots and shall have all powers and certificate of registration issued by the duties with respect to said maps and the state of California. (Ord. 77- procedures relating thereto which are specified by law -and by this Title. tle. The 92-4.012 Collector street. "Collector Zoning Administrator elects to refer said street" is any street within a subdivision maps to . the' Planning Commission for or adjacent thereto which, because of its consideration, approval, conditional location with reference to other streets or approval or disapproval. other sources of traffic, carries or will carry traffic from minor streets to the The Zoning Administrator is designated as major system of arterial streets; and the advisory agency with respect. to Ten- includes the principal entrance streets for tative - Maps relating to subdivisions of residential developments and streets for four or less lots and shall have all powers circulation of traffic within such develop- and duties with respect to said maps and ments and serves, or will' serve, twenty- the procedure relating thereto as four or more dwelling units. (Ord. 77- specified by law and this Title. The Planning Department is designated as 92-4.014 County. "County" means the the advisory agency for purposes of re- County of Contra Costa, State of Califor- viewing and approving a Tentative Map nia, of which the governing body is the pursuant to Article 94-2.202 of this Title. Board of Supervisors. (Ord. 77- (Ord. 77- 92-4.016 Critically expansive soils. 92-4.006 Arterial street. "Arterial ltjc�r—itfc-gly expansive soils" or other soil street" isany street or road passing problems are soil conditions which can adjacent to or through the subdivision, cause damage to improvements, including which carries the major flow of traffic, streets, structures and buildings. They and for which the major traffic may shall be tested by acceptable procedures ultimately be in excess of twenty-four to provide data suitable for making ade- hundred vehicles per day. (Ord. 77- ) quate designs for the improvements. (Ord. 77- 92-4.008 Block. "Block" means the length of the frontage along the property 92-4.018 Cul-de-sac. "Cul-de-sae" is a line between consecutive streets inter- street which connects to another street secting the frontage; and may also mean only at one end, and serves sixteen dwell- (WIS1 2 ing units or less, with a maximum length 92-4.030 Frontage. "Frontage" is the of seven hundred feet. (Ord. 77-_ ) width of the lot or block measured along the property line adjacent to the street. 92-4.020 Dwelling unit. "Dwelling (Ord. 77- ) unit" is a building or a portion thereof, or a mobile home, designed for residential 92-4.032 Frontage improvements. occupation by one person or a group of "Frontage improvements" consist of curb, two or more persons living together as a longitudinal drainage, sidewalks, street domestic unit. (Ord. 77-_) lighting, planting and paving, or any com- bination thereof. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.021 Engineering Geologist. "Engi- neering geologist" means a professional 92-4.034 Frontage road. "Frontage geologist in the branch of engineering road" is a street or road adjacent to an geology holding .a valid certificate of arterial, thoroughfare; or freeway,. which registration as an engineering geologist in provides access to abutting properties and the state of California. (Ord. 77= ) protection from the through traffic on the more heavily travelled street. (Ord. 77- 92-4.022 Final Map. "Final Map" is a ) map prepared in accordance with the _ provisions of this Title and the Subdivision 92-4.035 Geologic hazard or potential) Map Act, which .map is designed to be hazardous soil conditions. Includes but is filed in the office of the Recorder of not limited to conditions such as slope Contra Costa County. (Ord. 77- . ) stability, groundwater seepage, erosion hazards, expansive soil, fault-related haz- 92-4.024 Flood Control District. The ards, and liquefaction potential. (Ord. 77- "Contra Costa County Water Conservation _) and Flood Control District," hereinafter referred to as the "Flood Control 92-4.036 Health Department. The District," serves in an advisory. capacity "Health Department" of the county, act- to appropriate advisory agencies•and the ing through the County Health Officer or Board of Supervisors relating to drainage his representative, serves in an advisory and flood control matters. (Ord 77-_) capacity to appropriate advisory agencies and the Board of Supervisors concerning 92-4.026 Flood hazard. "Flood hazard" matters of sanitation and public health. is possible occurrence oT overflow storm (Ord. 77- ) water causing flooding of lands or improvements, or having sufficient velo- 92-4.038 Improvement plan. "Improve- city to transport or deposit debris, to ment plan" is a plan prepared under the scour the surface soil, to dislodge or direction of a civil engineer, registered by damage buildings, or to cause erosion of the State of California, showing the loca- the banks of channels. (Ord. 77-_) tion and construction details of all im- provements required for the subdivision. 92-4.028 Freeways. "Freeways" are (Ord. 77- ) those highways which are defined in Sec- tion 23.5 of the. Streets and Highways 92-4.040 Improvements. "Improve- Code of the State of California, and ments" refers to such street work, drain- which, because of their design and loca- age facilities, utilities, and other facili- tion with reference to the county highway ties required to be installed by the sub- system and state highway system are or divider on the land to be used for public or will be used primarily for fast, heavy, or private streets, highways, ways, and ease- dense traffic and for which right of access ments as a condition precedent to the from abutting property or streets along approval and acceptance of a Final or ' the right-of-way boundaries will be prohi- Parcel Map thereof. "Improvements" also bited or limited. Ord. 77--J refer to such other specific improvements ni�� 2 , or types of improvements, the installation j of which, either by the subdivider, by public agencies, by private utilities, by any other entity approved by the local agency or _by a combination thereof, is necessary or convenient to insure con- formity to or implementation of the Gen- eral Plan or any Specific Plan adopted pursuant to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government-Code. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.042 Industrial street. "Industrial street" is a street serving traffic within an industrial development. (Ord.; 77=) 3+ 001 83 92-4.044 Inundation. "Inundation" is 92-4.064 Parcel. Map. "Parcel Maps' is use o indicate pon ed storm water or a map prepared in accordance with the storm water in motion of sufficient depth provisions:of this Title and the Subdivision to damage property due to the mere g P P Y Map Act. (Ord. 77- ) presence of-water or the depositing of —" silt. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.066 Path. "Path" is a right-of- way designated or use only by pedestrians 92-4.046 Lot. "Lot" means that portion and not intended for use as a way for of a parcel o land which is delineated or motor-driven vehicles. Public paths are described as a single integral unit on.the rights-of-way offered for dedication by a subdivision map. (Ord. 77- ) Final or Parcel Map or deeded to and accepted by the governing body of the 92-4.048 Major drainage channels or county. Private paths are'for the benefit conduits. "Major drainage channels or of the owners of lots designated on the conduits" are those channels or: conduits Final or Parcel Map. (Ord, 77- ) which serve a drainage area of four square miles or more. (Ord.-77- ) 92-4.068 Planning Department. "Plan- ning Department" is the technical staff of 92-4.050 Marginal strip. "Marginal the Planning Commission and is one of the strip" is the area between the edge of the divisions of county government. "Planning traveled roadway or curb line,• and the Department" shall also be the clerk of the adjacent property line. (Ord. 77-: _) advisory agency for purposes of receiving Tentative Maps' and clerk of. the appeals 92-4.052 Median. "Median" is the area board and legislative body for purposes of separating two roadways within the right- filing appeals as provided in the Subdivi- '` of-way. (Ord. 77- ) sion Map Act. (Ord, 77- ) 92-4.054 Minor drainage channels or 92-4.070 Ponding of local storm water. conduits. "Minor drainage channels or "ponding of local storm water' is standing conduits" are those channels or conduits storm water in local depressions.' As which serve a drainage area of..one square distinguished .from sheet overflow water, mile or less. (Ord. 77- ) this water originates on or in the vicinity of the subdivision, and due to the condi- 92-4.056 Minor street. "Minor street" tion of the ground surface, does not reach is any street which serves traffic for not a drainage channel or conduit. (Ord. 77- more than twenty-four dwelling units. ) (Ord. 77- 92-4.072 Preliminary soil report. "Pre 92-4.058 Minor Subdivision. "Minor liminary soil report" means a report pre- Subdivision" re ers to a subdivision of four pared by a soil engineer based upon or less lots. .(Ord. 77- ) adequate test borings or excavations jr, accordance with the provisions of this 92-4.060 Ordinance Specifications. Title and the Subdivision Map Act. (Ord. "Ordinance Specifications" refers to the 77- ) ordinance specifications as approved by resolution of the Board of Supervisors, in 92-4.074 Private road. "Private road" effect at the time. of filing the Parcel means any parcel of land or nonexclusive Map or Final Map of the subdivision, three easement not owned by the county, cities, copies of which are filed with the Clerk of or the State of California, which is used the Board of Supervisors. (Ord. 77-� ) or intended to be used for access to a lot or parcel. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.062 Parcel. "Parcel" is all land -� which is contiguous and under one owner- 92-4.076 Public street. "Public street'? ship. (Ord. 77- ) is a street for which the ee title or right- 4 00 a ' • 92-4.044 Inundation. "Inundation" is 92-4,064 Parcel. Map "Parcel Map" is use o indicate pon ed storm water or a map prepared ut accordance with the storm water in motion of sufficient depth provisions:of this Title and the Subdivision to damage property due to the mere Map Act. '{Ord. 77- } presence of•water or the depositing of silt. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.066 Path. "Path" is a right-of- way designated for use only by pedestrians 92-4.046 Lot. "Lot" means that portion and not intended for use as a way for of a parcel oMnd which is delineated or motor-driven vehicles. Public paths are described as a single integral unit on-the rights-of-way offered for dedication by a subdivision map. (Ord. 77- ) Final or Parcel Map or deeded to and accepted by the governing body of the 92-4.048 Major drainage channels or county. Private paths are for the benefit conduits. .. "Major drainage channels or of the owners of lots designated on the conduits are those channels or. conduits Final or Parcel Map. (Ord. 77- ) which serve a drainage area of four square miles or more. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.068 Planning Department. "Plan- ning Department" is the technical staff of 92-4.050 Marginal strip. "Marginal the Planning Commission and is one of the strip" is the area between the edge of the divisions of county government. "Planning traveled roadway or curb line,- and the Department" shall also be the clerk of the adjacent property line. (Ord. 77 } advisory agency for purposes of receiving Tentative Maps* and clerk of the appeals 92-4.052 Median. "Median" is the area board and legislative body for purposes of separatiingwtwt o roadways within the right- filing appeals as provided in the Subdivi- '' of-way. (Ord. 77- ) _ sion Map Act. (Ord. 77- ) 92-4.054 Minor drainage channels or 92-4,070 Ponding of local storm water. conduits. . "Minotnage channels or "Ponding ot local storm water" is standing conduits are those channels or conduits storm water in local depressions." As which serve a drainage area of.one square distinguished .from sheet overflow water, mile or less. (Ord. 77- ) this water originates on or in the vicinity of the subdivision, and due to the condi- 92-4.056 Minor. street. "Minor street" tion of the ground surface, does not reach is any street which serves traffic for not a drainage channel or conduit. (Ord. 77- more than twenty-four dwelling units. ) (Ord. 77- ). . 92-4.072 Preliminary soil report. "Pre- 92-4.058 Minor Subdivision. "Minor liminary soil report" means a report pre-- Subdivision"refers, to a subdivision of four pared by a soil engineer based upon or less lots, (Ord. 77- ) adequate test borings or excavations in accordance with the provisions of this 92-4.060 Ordinance Specifications. Title and the Subdivision Map Act. (Ord. "Ordinance Specifications" refers to the ordinance specifications as approved by resolution of the Board of Supervisors, in 92-4,074 Private road. "Private road" effect at the time, of filing the Parcel means any parcel of land or nonexclusive Map or Final Map of the subdivision, three easement not owned by the county, cities,- copies of which are filed with the Clerk of or the State of California, which is used the Burd of Supervisors. (Ord. 77- ) or intended to be used for access to a lot or parcel. (Ord: 77- ) 92-4.062 Parcel, "Parcel" is all land which is contiguous and under one owner- 92-4.076 Public street, "Public street" ship. {Ord. 77- ) is a street for which the ee title or right- 4 001 of-way is owned by the county, or offered 92-4.090 Subdivision. "Subdivision" for dedication to the public and accepted means the division o any improved or by the county. (Ord. 77-_) unimproved land, shown on the latest equalized county assessment roll as a unit 92-4.078 Public Works Department. or as contiguous units, for the purpose of The "Public Works Department" is the sale, lease or financing, whether imme county department which serves in an diate or future, except for leases of advisory capacity to appropriate advisory agricultural land for agricultural purposes agencies and the Board of Supervisors for the cultivation of food or fiber or the concerning streets, drainage, engineering, grazing or pasturing of livestock. Prop- and matters related to the office of erty shall be considered 'as contiguous County Surveyor: The Public Works De- units, even if it is separated by roads, partment is designated as the Clerk of the streets, utility easement or railroad Board of Supervisors for purposes of re- rights-of-way. "Subdivision" includes a ceiving Final or Parcel Maps. (Ord. 77- condominium project, as defined in Sec- tion 1350 of the Civil Code or a commun- ity apartment project, as defined in Sec- 92-4.080 Secondary drainage channels tion 11004 of the Business and Professions or conduits. "Secondary drainage channels Code. Any conveyance of land to a or conduits" are those channels or con- governmental agency, public entity or duits which serve a drainage area less public utility shall not be considered a than four square miles.and more than one division of land for purposes of computing • square mile. (Ord. 77-_ ) the number of lots. "Subdivision" shall not include a division resulting from a convey- 92-4.082 Sheet overflow. "Sheet over- ance of land or interest therein to an flow" indicates water of minor depths abutting property owner, not involving the either quiescent or flowing at .velocities creation of a new building lot or site, and less than those necessary to produce both parcels or lots will conform in all serious scour. (Ord. 77-._ ) other respects to this division and the County zoning ordinances after such divi- 92-4.084 Soil Engineer. "Soil engineer' sion, provided it is approved by resolution is a civil engineer who is experienced is of the Zoning Administrator. (Ord. 77- soil mechanics, who investigates and re- ) ports on the stability of existing or pro- 'posed slopes, who controls the installation 92-4.092 Tentative Map. "Tentative and compaction of fills, who recommends Map" refers to a map for the purpose of soil bearing values, and who provides showing the design of a proposed subdivi- design criteria and calculations for special sion and the existing conditions on and earth structures such as buttress fills. around the proposed subdivision. (Ord. 77- (Ord. 77-^) ^) 92-4.086 Street. "Street" is a way, 92-4.094 Thoroughfares. "Thorough- excluding a path or alley, for•pedestrian fares" are those roads of general county and vehicular traffic. (Ord. 77-_ ) importance which are designated as. county thoroughfares, either existing or 92-4.088 Subdivider. "Subdivider' proposed, on the county general plan of means a person, .firm, corporation, part- roads. (Ord. 77- ) nership or association who proposes to divide, divides or causes to be divided real EXCEPTIONS property into a subdivision for himself or for others. (Ord..77- ) Sections: 92-6.002 Advisory agency findings 5 00185 92-6.004 Advisory agency conditions. 92-8.004 Compliance with specifica- 92-6.006 Modification of requirements tions 92-6.002 Advisory agency findings. 92-8.002 Conformance to code. All Subject to the Subdivision Map .Act, the subdivisions subject to the provisions of advisory agency may authorize exceptions this Title shall conform to the regulations to any of the requirements and regulations of the county code and applicable zoning set forth in this Title. Application- for ordinances. (Ord. 77- ) such exception shall be made by the subdivider, stating fully the grounds for 92-8.004 Compliance with specifica- the application and the facts relied upon, tions. All construction materials, and the subdivider shall grant such addi- methods, tests, and workmanship shall tional time as May be required by the comply with the requirements of the advisory agency for the consideration of "Ordinance Specifications." (Ord. 77- the exception. Before granting .any such ) exception, the advisory agency shall find: (1) That there are unusual circumstances Chapter 92-10 or conditions affecting the property; ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT (2) That the exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a sub- stantial property right of the applicant; Sections: (3) That the granting of the exception 92-10.002 Action by interested persons _ 92-10.004 will not be materially detrimental to the Time Limits public welfare or injurious to other prop- 92-10.002 Action by interested persons. >> erty in the territory in which the property is situated. (Ord. 77- ) (a) When any provision of the Subdivision Map Act or this Title requires the exe- 92-6.004 Advisory agency conditions. cution of any certificate or affidavit or . In granting any such exception, the advi- the performance of any act by a person in sory agency shall designate the conditions his official capacity, who is also a subdivi- under which the exception is granted. der or an agent or employee thereof, such (Ord. ?7- ) certificate or affidavit shall be executed or such act performed by some other 92-6.006 Modification of requirements. person duly qualified therefor and desig- The standards and requirements•of these Hated so to act by the Board of regulations may be modified by the Plan- Supervisors. ning Commission in.the case of a plan or (b) All legal forms and notes used in certificates, 'acknowledgements, dedica- program for a new town; or for a com- . plete community or neighborhood unit tions, and other matters shall be subject which the Planning Commission finds pro- to approval by the County Counsel. (Ord. vides adequate public spaces and improve- 77- ) ments for the circulation, recreation, light, air and service needs of the subdivi- 92-10.004 Time Limits. The time limits speci sions when fully developed and populated, ied in this Title may be and which also provides such other provi- extended by mutual consent of the parties sions as will assure conformity to and concerned. (Ord. 77- ) _ achievement of the adopted General Plan. (Ord. 77- ) Chapter 92-12 J! Chapter 92-8 NOTICES OF VIOLATION AND MERGER = AND CERITIFCATES OF COMPLIANCE CONFORMANCE - Article 92-12.2 General Sections: Sections: 92-8.002 Conformance to code 92-12.202 Purpose 6 Article 92-12.4 Notices of violation and on his own: initiative or upon investigation merger of information received, determines that Sections: real property has been divided in violation 92-12.402 Knowledge of the provisions of the Subdivision Map 92-12.404 Tentative Violation Re- Act or of this Title, he may cause a notice. cordation of intention to record a notice of viola- 92-12.406 Violation Hearing No- tion, setting forth the information pre- tice scribed by Government Code Section 92-12.408 Merger Notice Rector- 66499.36, to be recorded with the County dations Recorder. (Ord. 77- ) 92-12.410 Merger Hearing 92-12.412 Planning Commission 92-12.406 Violation Hearing Notice. hearing After recording the notice of intention to 92-12.414 Board of Supervisors record a notice of violation, and at least Hearing sixty calendar days prior to the recording 92-12.416 Violation Action of a notice of violation, the Director of Article 92-12.6 Certificates of Compli- Planning shall advise the owner of the real ance property, by mail, - of the intention to Sections: record a notice and specifying a time, 92-12.602 Application date and place at which the owner .may 92-12.604 Fees present evidence to the Planning Commis- 92-12.606 Decision sion twhy such notice should not be 92-12.608 Denial - action recorded. The Director shall also mail a 92-12.610 Map compliance copy of the recorded notice of intention ►, to the owner. (Ord.. 77- ) Article 92-12.2 : General 92-12.408 Mer er Notice Recordations. If the Director of Planning, either on his 92-12.202 Purpose. This chapter sup- own initiative or upon investigation of plements the provisions of Government information received, determines that . Code Sections 66424.2, 66499.34;66499.35 contiguous parcels of land have merged and 66499.36 (Subdivision Map Act), per- pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivi- twining to notices of merger and violation sion Map Act or of this Title, he may and certificates of compliance. The cause a notice of merger, setting forth development of real property • in this the information prescribed by Government County which has been divided, or has Code Section 66424.2, to be recorded with resulted from a division, in violation of the County Recorder. (Ord. 77- ) provisions of the Subdivision Nlap Act and this Title is contrary to the public health, 92-12.410 Merger Hearing. At least safety and welfare. (Ord. 77- ) thirty calendar days prior to the recording of a notice of merger, the Director of Article 92-12.4 Planning shall advise the owner of the Notices of Violation and Merger parcels or units of land to be affected by the merger, in writing, of the intention to " 92-12.4021 Knowledge. Any county record a notice of merger and specifying a official having knowledge of a possible time, date and place at which the owner violation of, or the merger of parcels of may present evidence to the Planning land pursuant to the provisions of the Commission why such notice should not be Subdivision Map Act or of this Title, shall recorded. (Ord. 77- ) convey such information to the Director .of Planning. (Ord. 77- ) 92-12.412 Planning Commission Hear- ing. Upon the noticed hearing the Plann-, 92-12.404 Tentative Violation Recor- ing Commission may wholly or partially dation. If the Director-of Planning, either affirm, reverse or modify the decision of r 7 the Director of Planning and his.recorda- 92-12.604 Fees.: Upon requesting issu- tion of the notice of intention to record a ante of a. ceri icate of compliance, the notice of violation or noticed intention to applicant shall deposit with the Director record a notice of merger. If the Planning of Planning for payment to the treasurer Commission determines that no violation of the county cash or check in a sufficient of, or merger pursuant to the Subdivision sum to cover the fee for issuance and Map Act or this Title has occurred, it may recording :of the certificate: of compli- direct the Director. of Planning to issue ance. The schedule of fees will be those and file for recordation a releaase of the recommended by the Director of Planning notice of intention to record a notice of and adopted by the Board of Supervisors violation or not to'file a notice of merger. from time to time by resolution. (Ord. (Ord. 77- ) 77- ) 92-12.414 Board of Supervisors Hear- 92-12.606 Decision. Within 15 calendar _ ing. Any hearing before the Board of days after filing of the request, the Supervisors of an •appeal from the Plan- Director of Planning shall review the ning Commission as to the recordation of request and determine whether the prop- a notice of intention to record a notice of erty or the division thereof complies with violation or proposed recordation of a the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act notice of merger shall be conducted in and this Title, and shall determine accordance with the provisons pertaining whether a certificate of compliance to such appeals before the Commission. should be issued or denied or a conditional (Ord. 77-` ) certificate of compliance issued and re- corded. Any certificate of conditional 92-12.416 Violation Action. All certificate of compliance issued shall set departments, officials, and employees of forth the information prescribed by Gov- the county vested with the duty or author- ernment Code Section 66499.35 and shall ity to issue permits necessary to develop be filed for record with the County any real property shall conform to the Recorder by the Director of Planning. If provisions of this Title, and shall not the Director of Planning determines that willfully issue any permit or license for such property could.be brought into com- use or construction or any other purpose pliance by fulfillment of certain condi- in conflict with the provisions of this Title tions, he shall so state in his decision of or of the Subdivision Map Act; and any denial or the conditional certificate of such permit or license issued in- conflict compliance issued and recorded. (Ord. 77- therewith shall be null and void. Nothing _ ) in this Chapter shall be deemed to require the recording of a notice of violation or 92-12.608 Denial-Action. Upon denial merger as a condition precedent to the of any request for a certi icate of compli- enforceability of any of the provisions of ance by the Planning Director, the appli- this Title. (Ord-77-—) cant may still apply to the appropriate division of the County's Planning Agency Article 92-12.6 in accordance with the provisions of this Certificates of Compliance Title for approval of a Final or Parcel Map for his property. (Ord. 77- 92-12.602 7-9212.602 Application. Requests for 92-12.610 Map compliance. A recorded issuance of a certificate of compliance Final flap or Parcel �tilap shall constitute a shall be submitted, in legible and readily certificate of compliance with respect to reproducible writing, to the Planning De- the parcel of real property described partment, on its standardized form ac- therein. (Ord. 77- ) companied by a plo+ plan and such sup- — porting information as may be deemed Division 94 necessary by the Director of Planning to MAPS determine compliance herewith. (Ord. �,�� 77- ) JJ . 8 ters: 2. Both lots, after division, will front on , 1-2 Tentative Maps a public or dedicated street. 94-4 Final Maps and Parcel Maps 3. Dedication is not required for widen- ing, extending or creating a street. 4. The' lots created will, in all other Chapter 94-2 respects, comply with legal require- ments. TENTATIVE MAPS (Ord. 77- Article 94-2.2 General 94-2.204 Information required. The Sections: 94-2.202 Tentative Map Tentative Map shall be clearly anlegibly 94-2.204 information required drawn on one sheet, unless prior written approval of the Planning Department is 94-2.206 Data to accompany ll Tentative Map � given for more than one sheet, and shall Article 94-2.4 Design objectives contain .the following information: Article 94-2.6 Filing (1) The title, which shall containthe Sections. subdivision number assiged by "the 94-2.602 General Planning Department and the type of 94-2.604 Referral to interested subdivision, and may contain such agencies name as may - be selected by the 94-2.606 Subdivision conference subdivider; 94-2.608 Requests for exceptions (2) Names and addresses for: and variances 94-2.610 Expiration-Extension (A) Legal owner of property, (B) Subdivider, and Article 94-2.8 Action _ by _ Advisory (C) Person or persons who prepared Agency the map; Sections: (3) A topographical map accurately 94-2. 02 Approval of Tentative showing contours and other features Map of the existing terrain within the 94-2.804 Approval of exception subdivision, existing drainage chan- and variance applica- nets, roads, culverts, overhead and tions underground utility lines which may 94-2.806 Findings affect the design of the subdivision, Article 94-2.10 Appeal wells and springs, major structures, Sections:. irrigation ditches, utility poles, and 94-2.1002 Appeal-Procedure-Fee other improvements in their correct ' location. Elevations shall be in ac- Article 94-2.2 cord with U. S. Geological Survey (1929 Sea Level Datum). The map General shall be drawn to an engineer's scale large enough to show all. information 94-2.202 Tentative Map. A Tentative clearly. The parcel shall be oriented Map shall be submitted for approval pre- on the map sheet such.that the north ceding the submission of the Final Map or arrow shall point toward the top of Parcel Map for a subdivision. If all of the the sheet. Contour interval shall not following conditions are met by the appli- be greater than two feet if the cation and Tentative Map, the Zoning ground slope is less than ten percent Administrator (or staff) may approve the nor larger than five feet for ground Tentative Map: slopes greater than ten percent; and 1. No more than two lots are proposed at such intervals that the contour to be created and each of such lots lines will not be spread more than one cannot be further divided under the hundred fifty feet (ground distance) existing zoning classifications. apart. The map shall show: 9 00190 S (A) The outline of any geologic or (H) Typical geometric sections for potentially hazardous soil condi- streets showing pavement width, tion, and areas subject to inunda- 6jrbs, sidewalks, grading in mar- tion or ponding, gin strips, slopes of cuts and (B) The edges of pavement of exist- fills, and other construction pro- , ing streets, private roads, drive- posed or applicable, ways and other paved areas, (I) Areas to be used for public pur- (C) Location of existing property poses, lines and approximate boundaries (J) Location,- approximate grade, of existing easements within the direction of flow and type of subdivision, with the names of facility of existing drainage the owners of record, of ease- channels and storm drains, ments,.exclusions, and the prop- (K) A vicinity map showing roads, erties abutting the subdivision, adjoining subdivisions, towns (D) The proposed lot and street lay- creeks, railroads, and other data out with scaled dimensions of sufficient to locate the proposed each lot. Lot dimensions shall subdivision and show its relation conform to the requirements of to community development, Division 82 as to size and dimen- (L) North arrow, scales for maps and sions. contour interval, Lots, where not served by public (M) Boundary lines of existing land, sewers, shall not be smaller in use zones shall be delineated, area than the Health Department (N) Statement or plan as to proposed shall approve for septic tanks plans for draining the area sub- and drain field installation. ject to flooding or inundation by Side 'lot lines shall be. substan- waters flowing into or from the tially at right angles or'radial to subdivision, street lines. (0) If to be developed in increments, Each lot shall be identified by (a) the map shall indicate the lot numbers, beginning with num- approximate sequence of devel- ber "1" in each subdivision re- opment by units. quiring a Final Map; or (b) lot (Ord. 77-_) letters, beginning with letter "A" in each subdivision requiring a 94-2.206 Data to accompany Tentative Parcel Map. Numbers or letters Map. The Tentative Map shall be accom- shall be consecutive with no panied by the following data, which shall omissions or duplications. be submitted at the time the map is filed The subdivider shall show the with the Planning Department: area of each lot on the Tentative (1) A written statement of general infor- Map. The area shall be exclusive mation which shall contain the fol- of the portion lying in the street. lowing information: (E) The location of all proposed (A) Existing use or uses of property, easements for drainage and (B) A description of the proposed access, subdivision, including the number (F) The location and species of all of lots, their average and min- trees or; if massed, the outline imum size, and nature of devel- of the tree mass. Trunk dia- opment, meter of'all trees six (6) inches (C) Source of water supply, in diameter and over shall be (D) The method of sewage disposal noted. proposed, (G) Street names, width of streets (E) Other improvements proposed; and easements, approximate (2) Two copies of a preliminary geologic grade, and radius of curves along and/or soils reconnaissance report, as property lines of each street, required by the Planning Department. (��l 191 10 Each report of a geological investi- for a preliminary geologic or soils gation shall be prepared and signed by reconnaissance report. Such a report an engineering geologist. Each report may be required if the PIanning of a soil investigation shall be pre- Department determines that there pared and signed by a soil engineer. are apparent hazardous geologic or The. required report should be based soils conditions within, adjacent to.- on o;on the latest grading plan for the or affecting the subdivision. subject development and shall refer- An engineering geologist, within or ence the date of that grading plan. retained by Contra Costa County, The format for required reports shall shall evaluate the reports required generally follow the guidelines for herein and advise the body having Geologic/Seismic reports required by jurisdiction and authority. Supple- the Planning Department. All reports mental reports and data may be shall include-the following: required if deemed necessary. (A) A detailed geologic map showing (3) When a Tentative Map is filed on an the location and extent of any area which is a part of a larger single geologic hazard or potentially ownership which may be subdivided in hazardous soil condition within the future, the Planning Department or immediately adjoining the may require a development plan subject property which warrants showing the proposed future develop- special management and/or fur- ment; • ther evaluation. (4) Four copies of a preliminary grading (B) Recommendations outlining an and site development plan, including exploration program to:fully de- drainage, when required by the Plan- fine lanfine and delineate any geologic ning Department. hazard or potentially hazardous (Ord. 77- ) soil condition, and to accurately identify developable areas. Article 94-2.4 (C) Conclusions regarding the effect Design Objectives of any geologic hazard or poten- tially hazardous soil condition within or immediately adjoining the project site on the design of the proposed subdivision. (D) Recommendations for redesign of the subdivision and/or recom- .mendations for construction pro- cedures to mitigate potentially hazardous conditions, if war- ranted. Article 94-2.6 The requirement for a preliminary Filing .geologic or soils reconnaissance --. report may be waived if the Planning 94-2.642 General. The subdivider shall Department determines that there file with the Planning Department twen- are no apparent hazardous geologic or ty-five prints of the tentative map of the soils conditions within, adjacent to, subdivision for all subdivisions of five lots ' or affecting the subdivision, based or more. For subdivisions of four lots or department possesses. upon the geotechnical knowledge the less the subdivider shall file twelve prints For subdivisions of four lots or less of the tentative map. The filing fee there is no mandatory requirement �� 00192 1 specified in Article 26-2.28 shall accom- calendar days prioc to any final action of pany the tentative maps. The time of the advisory agency. •A revised Tentative filing a Tentative Map and the required Map may 'be submitted at least one week accompanying statement is when the prior to any final action of the advisory Planning Department accepts them. The agency. (Ord. 77- ) Planning Department, within four working days after the Tentative Map has been 94-2.608 Requests for exceptions and received, shall examine the map and variances. The subdivider may submit a accept it for filing if it appears to written request for exceptions as to street substantially comply in form and content improvements, widths, grades, and other to the' requirements of this Chapter, or subdivision matters or variances from shall return it to' the subdivider with a zoning requirements, subject to the appro- written statement of the reason. (Ord. val of the advisory agency. (Ord. 77- 77- ) ) 94-2.604 Referral to interested agen- 94-2.610 Expiration-Extension. The cies. The Planning Department, within approval or conditional approval of a five calendar days after the filing of the Tentative Map shall expire .12 months map, shall forward copies to the Public after its original approval. The expiration Works Department, the Health Officer, of the approval or. conditional approval Flood Control District, Building Inspection shallterminate all proceedings and no Department, the chief engineer of a sani- Final Map or Parcel Map of all or any tary district if the subdivision lies within portion of the real property included a sanitary district-, the chief of the local within the Tentative Map shall be filed fire district, the serving school district, without first processing a new Tentative the utility companies 'serving the area, the Map. Upon application of the subdivider State Department of Transportation, and filed.prior to the expiration date of the other interested state and regional agen- approval or conditional approval of the .cies. Each of the agencies, within fifteen Tentative Map, the time at which such calendar days after receipt of the map, map expires may be extended by the may forward to the Planning Department advisory agency which originally approved its findings and recommendations thereon. the Tentative Map for a period or periods (Ord. 77- ) not exceeding a total of two years. (Ord. 77- ) 94-2.606 Subdivision conference. Within twenty-five working days after the Article 94-2.8 filing of a Tentative Map in compliance Action by Advisory Agency with Section 94-2.602, the Planning De- partment may hold a subdivision confer- 94-2.802 Approval of Tentative Map. ence on the Tentative Map. Written The advisory agency, pursuant to Section notice of such conference shall be given 26-2.2212 of this code, shall approve, to all interested agencies. At such con- conditionally approve, or disapprove the ference the recommendations of the Plan- map, and shall report such action in ning Department and the other affected writing direct to the subdivider, the agencies may be considered and corre- Public Works Department and such other lated. Following the conference, a written agencies as requested. In the case of a report of the recommendations shall be proposed tentative map for a minor sub- presented to the appropriate advisory division the advisory agency shall hear it agency prior to final action of the advi- within fifty (50) working days after filing sory agency. The written report will be it and thereafter render a decision within served on the subdivider at least three fifteen (15) calendar days unless these 12 �)�)l 93 s time limiis have been extended by mutual 94-4.204 Boundary designation consent of the parties concerns. In the 94-4.206 Lot designation even the map is disapproved, the advisory 94-4.208 Title sheet agency's report shall set forth the basis of 94=4.210 Affidavits, certificates, its action and identify the requirements or dedications, etc. conditions which have not been met or 94-4.212 Scale, north point and ba- performed. (Ord. 77- ) sis of bearings 94-4.214 Easements 94-2.804 Apprbval of exception and 94-4.216 Linear, angular and radial variance applications. The advisory data agency shall also .approve or disapprove 94-4.218 Adjoining corners of ad- the application of the subdivider for ex- joining subdivisions ceptions and variances. (Ord. 77- ) 94-4.220 City boundaries 94-4.222 Monument location 94-2.806 Findings. The advisory 94•-4.224 Soil report certificate agency shall not approve a Tentative Map 94-4.226 Printing or lettering unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions Article 94=4.4 Supplementary Documents for its design and improvement, is consis- Sections: tent with the applicable General and 94-4.402 Approval of supplement- Specific Plans required by law. When ary documents - Final approving the tentative map for-a minor Maps and Parcel Maps • subdivision, the advisory agency shall 94-4.404 Subdivision agreement make findings as required concerning the 94-4.406 Cash deposit and perfor- fulfillment of construction requirements. mance security (Ord. 77- ) 94-4.408 Payment security 94-4.410 Fee payment evidence Article 94-2.10 94-4.412 Deed for easements or Appeal rights-of-way 94-4.414 Joint use of right-of-way 94-2.1002 Appeal-Procedure-Fee. .If agreement the subdivider or any interested person, as 94-4.416 Supplementary documents provided in Section 26-2.2404 of this code, - Final Maps only is dissatisfied with the action of the 94-4.418 Tax letter -Security advisory agency with respect to the Ten- 94-4.420 Soil report tative Map, or with the improvements required by the advisory agency, he may Article 94-4.6 Checking appeal.. as provided in Section 26-2.2404 Sections: of this code, within fifteen calendar days 94-4.602 Prints required and Fees after.such action to the appropriate ap- 94-4.604 Error of closure intra- pellate division as .provided in Section 26- verse 2.2406 of this code pursuant to Article 26- 94-4.606 Public Works Department 2.24, paying the fee required under Arti- action cle 25-2.28. (Ord. 77- ) Article 94-4.8 Approval Chapter 94-4 Sections: 94-4.802 Approval and filing of FINAL MAPS AND PARCEL 1�IAPS maps 94-4.804 Time limit for recording Article 94-4.2 Form and Contents 94-4.806 Evidence of title Sections: 94-4.808 Filing by units 94-4.202 Final and Parcel Maps - General x01 ` 4 13 Article 94-4.2 94-4.208 Title sheet. The title sheet Form and Contents shall contain the su division number, con- spicuously placed at the top of the sheet, 94-4.202 Final and Parcel Maps _ and the location of the property being . General. A Final Map shall be submitted subdivided with reference to maps which. t for approval for all subdivisions' creating have been previously recorded, or by five or more lots, five or more condomin- reference to the plat of a United States iums as defined in Section 783 of the Civil survey. A subdivision name may be added Code, or a community apartment project below the subdivision number. The sub- containing five or more lots, except as division number shall be larger print and provided in Government Code Section dominant to any name title. In case the 66426. property included within the subdivision A Parcel Map shall be submitted for lies wholly in unincorporated territory, approval for all subdivisions as to which a the following words' shall appear in the Final Map is not otherwise required by titles: "In the County of Contra Costa." this Title, except those created by short- If partly in unincorporated territory and term leases (terminable by either party on partly within an incorporated city, the not more than 30 days' notice in writing) following words shall be used: "Lying of a portion of the operating right-of-way within the County of Contra Costa and of,a railroad corporation defined as such partly within the City of .....;,. (Ord. .77- by Section 230 of the Public Utilities ) Code, unless a showing is made in indivi- dual cases, upon substantial evidence, that 94-4.210 Affidavits certificates dedi- public policy necessitates such a Parcel cations, etc. Affidavits, certificates, Map. a acknowledgments, endorsements, accept- The form and contents of the Final Map or antes of dedication, and the notarial seals Parcel Map shall be in conformance with required by law and this Title shall appear. the Subdivision Map Act and this Title. only once on the title sheet. The above (Ord. 77- ) certificates, etc., may be printed thereon with opaque ink and by photographic 94-4.204 Boundary desi-,nation. The reproduction. Black ink shall be used for- boundary of-the subdivision shall be desig- all signatures and seals. If more than nated by a solid black line one-sixteenth three sheets are used, a key diagram shall (1/16) inch wide. (Ord. 77- ) be included on the first sheet. Where recommended by the Public Works De- 94-4.206 Lot designation. On Final partment and approved by the Board of Maps, each lot shall be numbered, begin- Supervisors the requirement for owner's ning Vith number "1" and continuing con- certificates on a Parcel Map may be secutively with no omissions or duplica- waived. (Ord. 77- ) tions_ ,On .Parcel Maps, each lot shall be let- 94-4.212 Scale, north point and basis of tered, beginning with letter "A" and con bearings. There must appear on each map tinuing consecutively with no omissions or sheet the scale, the north point, and the duplications. basis of bearings. The scale shall be forty All figures shall be conspicuous and solid. feet, fifty feet, or sixty feet to the inch Circles or other designs shall not be drawn or as approved by the Public Works De- around the lot numbers or letters. Each partment. The basis of bearings shall be lot must be shown entirely on one sheet of that approved by the Public Works De- the map. Dimensions of lots shall be partment and the map shall show the given as the net dimensions to the bound- equation of bearing to the true north. All aries of adjoining streets. (Ord. 77-� ) bearings shall be based on the California Coordinate System, Zone III. (Ord. 77- map showing such :subdivision; and if no such subdivision is adjacent, then by the name of the owner and reference to the 94-4.214 Easements. (a) Easements for recorded deed by book and page number roads or streets, paths, storm water drain- for the last recorded owner of such age, sanitary sewers, or other public use adjacent property. (Ord. 77- ; ) as may be required by a public, agency, shall be dedicated to the public for future 94-4.220 City boundaries. City bound- acceptance by a public agency, and the aries which cross or join the subdivision use shall be specified on the map. shall be clearly designated. (Ord. 77- ) (b) Easements for an existing or pro- posed utility installation for the use of a 94-4.222 Monument location. The private or nongovernmental agency shall location and description of all existing and • not be shown on the map unless there is a proposed monuments shall be shown. Ade- recorded conveyance to such individual or quaey of monumentation shall be deter corporation, except as provided in subset- mined by the Public Works Department. tion (d). (Ord. 77- ) (c) All easements of record shall be shown on the map, together with the name 94-4.224 Soil report certificate. When of* the grantee and sufficient recording a soil report has been prepared, the data to identify the conveyance, e.g., certificate required by Section 94-4.420 recorder's serial number and date, or book shall be noted on the map. (Ord. 77- and page of official records. ) (d) Easements 'not disclosed ; by the ` records in the office of the County Re- 94-4.226 Printing or lettering. All corder and found by the surveyor or printing or lettering on the map shall be engineer to be existing, shall be specifi- of one-eighth inch minimum height and of tally designated on the map, identifying such shape and weight as to 'be readily the apparent dominant tenements for legible on prints and other reproductions which the easement was created. made from the original drawings. No (e) The sidelines of all easements of ditto marks shall be used in the dimen- record shall be shown by dashed lines on sions and data shown on the map. (Ord.. the map with the widths, lengths and 77- ) bearings of record.* (Ord. 77- Article 94-4.4 94-4.216 Linear, angular and radial Supplementary Documents data. Sufficient linear, angular, and radial data shall be shown to determine 94-4.402 Approval of supplementary the bearings and lengths of the boundary documents-Final Maps and Parcel Maps. lines of the subdivision and of the bound- The Final Map or Parcel Map shall be ary lilies of every lot and parcel which is a accompanied by the documents.designated part thereof. Length, radius, and total in Sections 94-4.404 through 94-4.414, central angle or radial bearings of all which shall be approved by proper author- curves shall be shown. (Ord. 77-_) ities before the Final Map or Parcel Map is approved. A soil report. conforming to 94-4.218 Adjoining corners of adjoining the requirements of Section 94-4.420 of subdivisions. The adjoining corners of all this Title may be required by the advisory adjoining subdivisions shall be identified agency as a condition of approval of the by subdivision number, or name when not Tentative Map for a subdivision of four identified by official number, and refer- lots or less. (Ord. 77- ) ence to the book and page of the filed 00191) 15 94-4.404 Subdivision agreement. A new acceptable security guaranteeing the subdivision agreement shall be executed repair of: any defective work may be by the subdivider or his agent guaran- substituted for the performance security. teeing the completion of construction of The new security shall include the cash 1 improvements required by the county code deposit described above and shall be not and reviewed plans within a specified less than said cash deposit or fifteen time, and payment therefor. The subdivi- percent (15%) of the estimated cost of the sion agreement shall guarantee that all construction of the improvements, which- street and storm drain improvements'and ever amount is greater,. and shall be equipment deemed necessary for the use retained for the one-year guarantee of such subdivision or the proper drainage period. (Ord. 77- ) thereof and including, but not limited to, street surfacing, sidewalk, curbs, culverts, 94-4.408 Pa meat Security Security bridges, and storm drains shall: be free in the form of cash -deposit, acceptable from defects of material or workmanship surety bond, or acceptable instrument of and shall perform satisfactorily for a credit equivalent to fifty percent (50%) of period of at least .one year from and after the estimated cost of the improvement or the Board of Supervisors declares such the performance of the required act, shall improvements are complete. be required to secure payment to the The subdivider shall agree to repair any contractor, his subcontractors and to per- defect in any such improvement and to sons furnishing labor, materials or equip- replace any defective improvement which ment to them for the improvement or the cannot be repaired and which occurs performance of the required act. Six within the one-year period, at his own months after the acceptance of the work expense. as complete said payment security may be The one-year guarantee period shall not reduced to an amount not less than the apply to the improvement of a private total of all claims on which an action has road, which is to remain a private road. been filed and notice thereof given in (Ord. 77- ) writing to the legislative body; and if no such actions have been filed the security 94-4.406 Cash de osit and performance . may be released in full. (Ord. 77- security. 7-securit . A cash deposit, equal to one 1 percent of the estimated cost of con- 94-4.410 Fee payment evidence. Evi- struction of the improvements,• but not dence o cash payment o all fees required less than one thousand dollars ($1,000), for the checking and filing of maps, shall be required, together with such review of.the improvement plans, inspec- additional security in the form of cash tion of the construction, park dedication. deposit, acceptable surety bond, or fees, road, bridge or storm drainage im- acceptable instrument of credit equiva- provement area fees, fire hydrant rental lent to the estimated cost of the improve- fees and lighting fees shall be required. ment or of the act:to be performed, minus (Ord. 77- ) the cash deposit, guaranteeing perfor- mance of all work and repair of any 94-4.412 Deed for easements or rights- defect in the improvements which occurs of-way. Easements or rights-o -way within one (1) year of the acceptance of required for road or drainage purposes the work as complete, as set forth in the which have not been dedicated on the subdivision agreement. When there are no Final Map or Parcel Map shall be deeded. public improvements involved and the Written evidence acceptable to the county total cost of the private road improve- in the form of rights of entry or perma- ments is less than $1,000, the agreement nent easements across private property shall be secured by a cash deposit in the outside of the subdivision permitting or full amount of the estimated cost. Upon ?ranting access to perform necessary con- acceptance of the work as complete, a struction work and permitting the mainte- 16 00197 nance of the facility shall be required. recommended corrective action which is (Ord. 77- ) likely to prevent structural damage to each building, structure, or improvement. 94-4.414 Joint use of right-of-way to be constructed. agreement. Agreements, acceptable to It shall also report on the suitability of the county, executed by all owners of all the earth material for construction of utility and other easements within stable embankments and excavation proposed rights-of-way, consenting to,the slopes, including those necessary for any dedication of the road or consenting tb artificial or natural drainage channel; the joint use of the right-of-way, as may recommendations for construction proce- be required by the county for the public dures to obtain required.stability; maxi- use and convenience of the road, shall be mum .design velocities for any natural or required. (Ord. 77- ) artificial drainage channel; and any other geologic features, slides, unstable soil 94-4.416 Supplementary documents _ conditions, springs and seepage conditions, Final Maps only. In addition to those erosion control planting, or drainage documents specified in Sections :94-4.402 facilities to enable proper development of through 94-4.414, the Final Map..shall be the subdivision. accompanied by the documents designated The "preliminary soil report" shall be in Sections 94-4.418 and 94-4.420, which prepared on eight and one-half inch by shall be'approved by appropriate authori- eleven-inch paper of durable quality and ties before the Final Map is approved. any map or document which accompanies (Ord. 77- ) the report shall be of a convenient size and scale to fold to eight and one-half 94-4.418 Tax letter-Securitv. A letter inches by eleven inches. from the Tax Collector showing that all If the Building Inspector, or his desig- payable taxes and special assessments nated representative, determines that the have been paid and giving his estimate of report is complete and that the recom- taxes and assessments not yet.. payable mended action and procedures contained and, as applicable, an acceptable surety in the 'report are likely to prevent strue- bond or acceptable instrument of credit tural damage to buildings, structures or for their payment (where required by improvements to be constructed within Government Code Section 66492.) shall be the subdivision, he shall approve the filed with the Clerk of the Board of report and shall certify on the Final Map Supervisors. (Ord.;77- ) or Parcel Map that a preliminary soil investigation report has been prepared, 94-4.420 Soil report. Two copies of a together with the date of the report and preliminary soil investigation report to the name of the soil engineer preparing the Building Inspection Department shall the report and shall state that the report be required unless waived because the has been approved-'and is on file in the Building Inspection Department has deter- Building Inspection Department. The mined that, due to.the knowledge it has of recommended actions and procedures con- the soil qualities within the subdivision, no tained in the report shall become a condi- preliminary analysis is necessary. tion of approval and shall be incorporated The report shall indicate the presence in the development of the subdivision. of any critically expansive soils or any (Ord. 77-_) other soil problems which, if not cor- rected, may lead to defects in structures, buildings or other improvements. If the report indicates such soil problems, it shall further report on an investigation of each lot of the subdivision, including • 00198 17 Article 94-4.6 to the Board of Supervisors for approval. Checking The Board of Supervisors, within a period of ten calendar days after the filing of the 94-4.602 Prints required and Fees. The Final Map or Parcel Map with the Public subdivider shall submit three sets of prints Works Department, or at its next regular of the map and certificate sheet to the meeting after the meetina. at which it Public Works Department for checking receives the map, whichever is later, shall purposes beforethe certificates on the approve the map if it conforms to all original tracings are executed. The pre- requirements of law and this Title. The liminary prints shall be accompanied by a Board shall not approve the map unless it current preliminary title report, furnished shall find that the proposed subdivision, by the applicant and acceptable to the together with the provisions for its design Public Works Department; by traverse and improvement, is consistent with the sheets prepared by the subdivider's engi- applicable General and Specific Plans re- neer, showing the mathematical closure of quired by law. In the event the final or the subdivision's exterior boundaries; and parcel map is disapproved, the Board shall by a checkingfee as established and set forth the basis of its action and adopted by the Board of Supervisors from identify the requirements or conditions time to time by resolution. (Ord. 77- which have not been met or performed. At the time of its actions thereon, the Board shall accept, accept subject to 94-4.604 Error of closure in traverse. improvements, or reject any or all offers The error of closure in traverse around of dedication of streets and other ease- the subdivision and around the: interior ments. lots or blocks*shall not exceed one part in On approval of any Final Map or Parcel twenty thousand. (Ord. 77- Map, the Clerk of the Board of Supervi- sors shall release the map to the subdivi- 94-4.606 Public Works Department der's title company for ultimate trans- action. The Public Works Department, mittal to, and filing with the County within ten working days, shall-note the Recorder. In addition to the original required corrections, if any, on. one set of tracings, the subdivider's title company the preliminary prints and return' them to shall provide the County Recorder with a the engineer or surveyor for revision of blue line print on linen of each sheet. ,the maps. (Ord. 77- (Ord. 77- Article 94-4.8 94-4.806 Time limit for recording. The Approval time limit for recording the Final Map or . Parcel Map shall be.twelve months, com- 94-4.892 Approval and Filing of Maps. mencing with the approval of the Tenta- The original tracing. and one sat oUprints tive Map by the advisory agency, unless an of the revised map prepared in accordance extension of time is granted pursuant to with the Subdivision Map Act and this Section 94-2.610. (Ord. 77- Title and corrected to its final form, and signed by all parties required by the 94-4.808 Evidence of Title. The sub- Subdivision Map Act and this Title to divider shall present to the recorder the execute the certificates on the map, evidence of title required by the Subdivi- together with all supplementary docu- sion Map Act and this Title. (Ord. 77- ments and fees shall be presented to the Public Works Department for filing. If the map, all documents and fees are 94-4.810 Filing by units. The subdivider determined to be satisfactory, the Public may elect to file a Final Map for all or Works Department, within ten calendar part of the approved Tentative h1ap in the days following receipt, shall present them sequence of units approved by the Plan- 00199 ning Commission. Each Final Map which 96-2.202 General. Following approval constitutes a part, or unit, of the of the Tentative Map, the subdivider shall approved Tentative Map shall have a prepare and submit to the Public Works separate subdivision number. The subdivi- Department for review, complete con- ' sion agreement to be executed by the struction plans for the improvements re- subdivider shall provide for the construe- quired by this Title. (Ord. 77- ) tion of such improvements as may' be required to constitute. a logical and 96-2.204 Contents. The plans shall be orderly development of the whole subdivi- prepared under the direction of a regis- sion by units. (Ord.. 77- ) tered civil engineer, licensed by the State of California, and shall show the complete Division 96 plans, profiles and details for all street • work, drainage channels and structures, IMPROVEMENTS retaining walls or other improvements to support cut slopes and embankments, Chapters: bridges, the location of underground utili- 96-2 Plans ties which may control.the location and 96-4 Construction Work elevation of storm drains and culverts, the 96-6 Street Lighting location of fire hydrants, street . monu- 96-8 Sidewalks and Paths ments, curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, 96-10 Underground Utilities fences required by this Title, gates, drive- 96-12 Curbs and Gutters. ways, if constructed in conjunction with 96-14 Miscellaneous subdivision improvements, structures and drainage facilities to control slides, loea- Chapter 96-2 tion of street lights, sanitary sewers and other improvements which may be ` PLANS required to complete the work. If the plans include three or more sheets, a key Article 96-2.2 Forms and Contents map showing the streets, lots, street Sections: names-, storm drains, the area covered by 96-2.202 General each sheet of the plans, and a list showing 96-2.204 Contents the sheet numbers of the plans and their 96-2.206 Sewer plans contents shall be included on the first 96-2.208 Plans and profiles sheet of the plans. (Ord. 77- ) Article 96-2.4 Action by Public Works 96-2.206 Sewer plans. If the sanitary. Department sewers are not under county jurisdiction, Sections: the review of the improvement plans shall 96-2.402 Improvement plan review. not be construed as approval of the sewer 96-2.404 Corrected plans plans. (Ord. 77- ) 96-2.406 Review of revisions 96-2.408 Review prerequisite for 96-2.208 Plans and profiles. The plans Final Map or Parcel Map and profiles shall be submitted on uniform approval size sheets, twenty-four inches by thirty- 96-2.410 Supplementary plans and six inches overall dimension. A border documents shall be provided with one and one-half inches along the twenty-four inch limen- - Article 96-2.6 Appeal sion on the left hand side of the sheet, and Sections: a one half inch border on the other three 96-2.602 Appeal procedure sides. The sheets shall be provided with a suitable title block in the lower right hand Article 96-2.2 corner. The scales for various portions of Form and Contents the drawings and the north point where 19 00200 C applicable, shall be shown on all sheets. plans by the Public Works Department, Reference may be made to county stand- when improvements are required, shall be and details in lieu of duplicating .the a condition precedent to the approval of drawings thereon. The quality of the the Final, Map or Parcel Map for the drawings shall be such that high.contrast subdivision by the Board of Supervisors. microfilm reproductions may be made (Ord. 77- ) from them. All printing or lettering on the improvement plans shall be. of one- 96-2.410 Supplementary plans and docu- eighth inch minimum height and of such ments. Supplementary plans and docu- shape and weight as to be readily legible ments shall includegrading-plans, ol- on prints and microfilm reproductions. ogy, hydraulic computations and hst ruc - (Ord. 77- ) tural computations as required. (Ord. 77- Article 96-2.4 Action by Public Works Department Article 96-2.6 96-2.402 , Improvement Plan review. Appeal The subdivider shall submit four sets o 96-2.602 Appeal procedure. Appeal to improvement plans and a preliminary cost the Board of Supervisors shall be made estimate to the Public Works Department within fifteen working days on any con for review together with a review fee as ditios stated by the Public Works Depart- established and adopted by the Board of ment relative to the, improvement plans Supervisors from time to time by resolu- and not agreed to by the subdivider. (Ord. l tion. Upon completion of this review, one 77- ) set of the preliminary plans together with the required revisions, if any indicated c thereon, and a written statement will be Chapter 96-4 returned to the subdivider's engineer. (Ord. 77- ) CONSTRUCTION WORK 96-2.404 Corrected Plans. Six sets of Article 96-4.2 Inspection the corrected plans and any additional Sections: sets requested by the Public Works De- 96-4.202 General partment for distribution to interested 96-4.204 Right of Entry public agencies and utilities shall then be 96-4.206 Work prior to submitted to the • Public Works Depart- P Inspection' P 96-4.2A8 Fee ment. One set of the plans.reviewed by the Public Works Department with the Article 96-4.4 Completion r_-view and date noted thereon shall be Sections: returned to the subdivider's engineer. 96-4.402 General . (Ord. 77- ) 96-4.404 Penalty for Delay in Com- 96-2.406 Review of revisions. Requests pletion by the subdivider for review of revisions Article 96-4.6 Acceptance appearing necessary or desirable during Sections: construction shall be submitted to the 96-4.602 Recommendation by Pub- Public Works Department and processed in lic Works Department accordance with Sections 96-2.402 and 96-4.604 Resolution of Acceptance • 96-2.404 of this Division. (Ord. 77- ) Article 96-4.2 96-2.408 Review prerequisite for Final Inspection Map or Parcel Map approval. The comple- tion of the review of the improvement 96-4.202 General. All work done in constructing the improvements and all beyond the period stated in the subdivision materials furnished shall be subject to the agreement, unless an extension thereof is inspection of the Public Works Depart- approved by the Public Works Department ment. (Ord. 77- . } or Board of Supervisors and any involved corporate surety or financial institution, 96-4.204 Right of entry. The Public may result in forfeiture of the cash Works Department, the Building Inspec- deposit and/or security, or a portion tion Department and the Flood Control thereof, for the completion of the work. . District shall have:access to the-work at A one year extension may be approved by all times during its construction and shall the Public Works Department. Any be furnished with every reasonable facil- further extension can only.be approved by ity for ascertaining that the materials the Board of Supervisors. Prior to the used and the workmanship are in actor- approval of any extension the Public dance with the requirements of this Title. Works Department shall review the suffi (Ord. 77- ) eiency of the security and remaining work to be.done.' (Ord. 77- ) 96-4.206 Work prior to Ins ection. If any of the work on improvements is done Article 96-4.6 by the subdivider prior to the completion Acceptance of review of the improvement plans and payment of the inspection fee, or prior to 96-4.602 Recommendation by Public the inspection of the improvements as Works Department. When all improve- required by the Public Works Department, ment'wor c required by the improvement such work may be rejected and -shall be plans is complete to the satisfaction of deemed to have been done at the risk and the Public Works Department, it shall peril of the subdivider. (Ord. 77- ) notify the Board of Supervisors that such work has been 'satisfactorily completed 96-4.208 Fee. Prior to commencement and recommend the acceptance thereof. of construction, the subdivider shall pay (Ord. 77- ) to the Public Works Department the cost for the inspection of the work and check- 96-4.604 Resolution of I Acce tante. ing and testing of the materials as establ- Upon satisfactory completion of all work fished and adopted by the Board of Super- required to meet the requirements of this visors from time to time by resolution, Title and its acceptance, the Board of less the amount of the improvement plan Supervisors shall file a resolution of ae- review fee. If any portion of the work has ceptance. -(Ord. 77- } been done prior to the time of depositing the fee, the subdivider shall pay to the Chapter 96-6 county all necessary costs plus fifteen STREET LIGHTING percent thereof; for the inspection and testing required to verify the quantity and Article 96-6.2 Facilities quality of the work.done. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: 96-6.202 General Article 96-4.4 96-6.204 Near school sites Completion- 96-6.206 R-12 or higher density districts 96-4.402 General. The subdivider shall 96-6.208 Areas zoned for multiple prosecute the work to completion without family, business or com- -undue delay except for inclement weather mercial uses or other reasonable causes. (Ord. 77- 96-0.210 Existing public streets } 96-6.212 Construction plans 96=6.214 Size and location desig- 96-4.404 Penalty for Delay in Comple- nation tion. Delay in completion of the work 96-6.216 Intersections 00202 21 96-6.218 Review of plans 96-6.208 Areas zoned for multiple 96-6.220 Service rates family, business or commercial uses. 96-6.222 Street light ownership Street lighting facilities shall be provided along all streets within any portion of a Article 96-6.4 Standards subdivisiod zoned for multiple family, Sections: business or commercial land uses. (Ord. . 96-6.402 Placement 77- ) 96-6.404 Underground wiring 96-6.406 Electrolier installation- 96-6.210 Existing public streets. The 96-6.408 Ornamental Poles • requirements set forth in. Sections 96- 96-6.410 Conformance to Standards 6.202 - 96-6.208 apply to.the portions of any existing public street abutting the Article 96-6.6 County Service Areas subdivision. (Ord. 77- .(Street Street Lighting Sections: 96-6.212 Construction plans. Following 96-6.602 Request for street light-- approval of the Tentative Map, the sub- ing service divider shall prepare and submit for ap-- 96-6.604 Legal description. proval, as part of the improvement plans for the subdivision, construction plans for Article 96-6.8 Energizing Casts the street lighting improvements required Sections: by this Title. (Ord. 77- 9 9:08 0 2 7-96-6.802 Deposit required ` 96-6.804 Disposition of deposit 96-6.214 Size and location designation. 96-6.806 Unexpended deposit The improvement plans shall show the size and location of-each street light, and shall Article 96-6.2 bear the written approval by the public Facilities utility which proposes to serve the light- 96-6-202 96-6.202 General. To promote public ing system. (Ord. 7?- health, safety and welfare, .especially 96-6.216 Intersections. The Public traffic safety and crime deterrence, the Works Department may require upgrading subdivider shall provide street lighting of existing or proposed lights at intersec- facilities for proposed subdivisions to be tions where deemed necessary to prevent located as set forth in Sections 96-6.204 - a hazard to traffic or pedestrians. (Ord. 96-6.218. (Ord. 77- ) 77- ) 96-6.204 Near school sites. Street 96-6.218 Review of plans. The Public lighting -facilities shall be provided along Works Department's *review of the street all streets within one mile of an existing lighting part of the improvement plans, school or school.site approved by the local when street lighting facilities are re- school board. The one mile distance shall quired, shall be a condition precedent to be measured along the shortest pedestrian the approval of the Final Map or Parcel route available or planned, measured from Map for the subdivision by the Board of the closest boundary of the school and the Supervisors. (Ord. 77- ) subdivision. (Ord. 177- ) 96-6.220 Service Rates. Street lighting 96-6.206 R-12 or higher density dis- shall be provided pursuant to the latest tricts. Street lighting facilities shall be LS-1B street lighting rate established by provided along all streets wherein the the California Public Utilities Commis- area is zoned R-12 or in land use districts sion. (Ord. 77- ) having a higher density. (Ord. 77- ) '— 2Z . , 00203 96-6.222 Street Light Ownership. All 96-6.410: Conformance to Standards. hg ting systFffis shall be owned and street AU electricig equipment. and installation operated by the serving public utility shall conform to the applicable standards company under the jurisdiction, of the of the following, as they now exist or may California Public Utilities Commission, hereafter be amended: unless other adequate arrangements are (1) Electrical Safety Orders'of the Divi- approved by the Planning Commission. sion of Industrial Safety, Department of Neither the county nor any county service Industrial Relations, State of California; area (street lighting) shall be bound or (2) Rules for Overhead Electric Line obligatedfor the cost of procurement or Construction, General Order No. 95 of the erection of ornamental street lighting =P California Public Utilities Commission; standards or for the cost of equipment or (3) Standard Specifications of the serv- installation of any underground wiring ing public utility company. (Ord. 77- system. -(Ord. 77- Article 96-6.6 Article 96-6.4 County Service_Areas (Street Lighting) Standards 96-6.602 Request for Street Lighting 96-6.402 Placement. Whenever possi- Service. Before approval of the Final Map bli,_street light pales And other street or arcei Map of any subdivision in which lighting facilities shall be placed on lot the installation of street lighting facilities lines and at intersections in accordance isrequirea, the subdivider shall file a with the minimum'requirements regarding request quest with the Local Agency Formation spacing and lamp size for an new street Commission, copy to Public Works De- lighting to be established by the Board of partment, for approval of annexation of Supervisors on the recommendation of the the subdivision to 'a county service area Public 'Works Department. Street lighting for the purpose of financing the street shall be installed only within the right-of- lighting, maintenance and replacement way dedicated to the public and designed, costs, unless the subdivision is alreddy to be accepted for maintenance-by the contained within the boundaries of a county. (Ord. 77- county service area authorized to supply 96-6.404 ' Underground wirin:=r• Wiring street lighting: (Ord. 77- for street lighting purposes shall be in- 96-6.604 L2g.21 description. The request stalled underground and shall conform to shall be accompanied by a legal descrip- the standards of the public utility which tion of the exterior boundaries and map proposes -to'serve the street lighting Sys- showing the boundaries of the area to be ' tems. (Ord. 77- annexed with sufficient bearings and dis- tances to correctly describe the boundary. 96-6.406 Electrolier installation. When The map shall give such supplementary the subdivider requests installation of information as is necessary to accurately street lighting, electroliers must be furn- locate the area in relation to local ished and installed in accordance with the streets, city boundaries, or adjacent sub- requirements of the serving utility com- division. (Ord. 77- pany, before acceptance per Section 96- 4.602. (Ord. 77- Article 96-6.8 Ener&ing Costs 96-6.408 Ornamental Poles. Residential and commercial streetlightingpoles may 96-6.802 Deposit required. Prior to be of an ornamental type acceptable to approval of the Final Map or Faireel Map the Board of Supervisors when they meet the subdivider shall deposit money with the current standards of the serving public the Public Works Department, sufficient utility company. (Ord 77- in amount to energize and maintain the 23 00204 lights shown on the street lighting part of for pedestrian paths when required for the the improvement plans for one year. public convenience. (Ord. 77-_ ) (Ord. 77- ) J 96-8.206 Surfacing. Pedestrian paths 96-6.804 Disposition of deposit. The shall be surfaced with the same material one year lighting deposit shall be used to . of the same thickness specified below for pay the cost of energizing the lights from sidewalks and for a widthof at:least five the acceptance of the road and from fifty feet. (Ord. 77- percent occupancy of the subdivision until tax revenues are available to assume the Article 96-8.4 energizing cost. (Ord. 77- ) Sidewalks 96-6.806 Unexpended deposit. Any un- 96-8.402 Locations. Portland cement expended deposit shall be deposited to the concrete sidewalks shall be provided at credit of the lighting service ' area to the following locations within the subdivi- which the subdivision was annexed. (Ord. sion: 77- ) (1) Along all thoroughfares; (2) Along all arterials, collector and minor streets which serve as direct access to schools within one mile of an existing Chapter 9.6-8 school or school site approved by the local school board. The one mile distance shall SIDEWALKS AND PATHS be measured along the shortest pedestrian route available or planned, measured from Article 96-8.2 Paths the closest boundary of the school site and Sections: subdivision; 96-8.202 Along rear or side line of (3) Along all streets wherein the area is lots zoned R-12 or in land use districts having 96-8.204 Easements a higher density; 96-8.206 Surfacing (4) Along all streets within any portion of a subdivision zoned for multiple family, Article 96-8.4 Sidewalks. business, or 'commercial land uses. (Ord Sections: 77- ) 6-8.402 Locations 96-8.404 Width and thickness 96-8.404 Width and thickness. Sidewalks 96-8.406 Obstruction restriction shall be at least four feet wide, exclusive 96-8.408 Relationship to curbs of curbs, and not less than three and five 96-8.410 Relationship to right-of- eights inches thick. (Ord. 77-_) way line 96-8.406 Obstruction restriction. Side- Article 96-8.2 walks less than six feet in width shall not Paths be obstructed by utility installations, mailboxes or by planting. (Ord 77- ) 96-8.202 Along rear or side line of lots. Where paths are established along the rear 96-8.408 Relationship to curbs. Side- or side lines of lots, the path shall be walks adjacent to curbs shall be mono- entirely within the lot and contiguous to lithic with curb if curbs did not exist prior the rear line or side line of the lot, and to commencement of work included under the path shall be shown in dashed lines. the subdivision agreement. Sidewalks shall (Ord. 77- ) be adjacent to curbs unless the conditions • of approval of the Tentative Map provide 96-8.204 Easements. Easements not otherwise. (Ord. 77- ) less than six feet wide shall be provided 24 00205 96-8.4I0 Relationship to right-of-way. 96-12:206 Minumum grade Sidewalks shall be fully within the street 96-12:208 Designation on improve- right-of-way. (Ord. 77- ) _ ment plans 96-12.210 Minimum elevations Chapter 96-10 Article 96-12.4 Turn-Arounds° UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Sections: 96-12.402 Cul-de-sac Sections: 96-12.404 Radii for curb returns 96-10.002 Exceptions 96-12.406 Private road turn-around 96-10.004 Responsibility of subdivi- der Article 96-12.6 Driveways 96-10.006 Application of chapter Sections: 96-12.602 Encroachment permit re- 96-10.002 Exceptions. All utility dis- quired tributionacilities including but not limited to electric, communication and Article 96-12.2 cable television lines) within any residen- General tial or commercial subdivision shall be placed underground, except as follows: 96-12.202 Conditions requiring curbs. (1) Equipment appurtenant to under- Curbs shall be required under any of the ground facilities, such as surface mounted following conditions: transformers, pedestal 'mounted .terminal (1) The subdivision is within an R-20 boxes and meter cabinets, and concealed district or a district having a smaller lot ducts; size; (2) Metal poles supporting street lights. (2) The grade of the street is less than (Ord. 77- ) one percent or more than six percent; (3) The street frontage between adja- 96-10.004 Responsibility of subdivider. cent sections of curb is less than five The subdivider is responsible .for- com- hundred feet; plying with the requirements of this chap- (4) The subdivision is for commercial or ter and shall make the necessary arrange- industrial purposes. (Ord. 77- ) ments with the utility companies involved for the installation of the facilities. The 96-12.204 Block requirements. If curbs advisory agency may grant exceptions as are required in any portion of a block provided in. Chapter 92-6 if topographical, within the.subdivision, the entire frontage soil, or other conditions make underground along that block shall be curbed. (Ord. . installation of the facilities unreasonable 77- ) or impractical. (Ord. 77- ) 96-12.206 Minimum grade. The mini- 96-10.006 Application of chapter. mum grade for curbs and gutters shall be These. requirements apply to those por- one percent except a reduction may be tions of any existing public streets abut- authorized by the Public Works Depart- ting the subdivision. (Ord. 77-^ ) ment. (Ord. 77- ) 96-12.20_8 Designation on improvement Chapter 96-12 Tans. Improvement plans shall show curb proMes, including profiles for all curb CURBS AND GUTTERS returns and cul-de-sacs. (Ord. 77- ) Article 96-12.2 General 96-12.210 Minimum elevations. Mini- Sections: mum top of curb elevations shall conform 96-12.202 Conditions requiring curbs to Chapter 914-8. (Ord. 77- ) 96-12.204 Block requirements 25 00206 • Y , Article 96-12.4 county General Plan. The subdivider will urn- roun s be required to provide frontage improve- ments and pavement widening on the side 96-12.402 Cul-de-sac. A paved turn- or sides-of. the roadway adjacent to the around shall be provided at the ends of subdivision, including the adjustments of cul-de-sac streets. The radius for the edge all existing public utilities owned and of pavement, or curb line, shall be thirty- operated by public jurisdictions. (Ord. 77- five feet.•(Ord. 77- ) ) 96-12.404 Radii-for curb returns. Curb 96-14.004 Fire hydrants. The subdivider lines at street intersections and turn- shall arrange for the installation of fire arounds shall be constructed on a curve hydrants at locations designated by the having a radius equal to that shown below: local fire district and shall pay all costs in Standard Radius for Curb Returns. connection therewith. In those areas out- (1) All residential street intersections, side of- the East Bay Municipal Utility twenty feet; Districts the subdivider shall pay to the (2) Cul-de-sac turn-around, thirty--five Public Works Department an amount equal feet; to two years' rental for fire hydrant (3) Industrial street intersections, thirty service, which shall be forwarded through feet. (Ord. 77- } the Auditor-Controller to the serving fire protection district or fire district. (Ord. 96-12.406 Private road turn-around. A 77- paved turn-around area shall be provided at the end of any private road serving Division 98 more than two- lots. The radius for the edge of the pavement shall be thirty-five STREETS feet. Alternate turn-around provisions may be approved if adequate paved area is Chapters: provided to accommodate normal residen- 98-2 General tial traffic. (Ord. 77- ) 98-4 Width 98-6 Grades Article 96-12.6 98-8 Pavement Driveways 98-10 Street Trees 96-12.602 Encroachment permit Chapter 98-2 required. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from 'the Public Works De- GENERAL partment before construction of any driveway. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: Chapter 96-14 98-2.002 Conformance to General Plan MISCELLANEOUS 98-2.004 Reserve strips 98-2.006 Designation on Final Map or Parcel Map Sections: 98-2.008 Angle of intersection 96-14.002 Improvement of county 98-2.010 Centerlines streets 98-2.012 Distance between streets 96-14.004 Fire hydrants 98-2.014 Block length 98-2.016 Street name approval 96-14.002 Improvement of county 98-2.018 Street name signs streets. Frontage improvments shall be 98-2.020 Conditions requiring grade provided on all existing county streets separation adjacent to any subdivision to the stand- 98-2.022 Classification ards required by this Title and the adopted 98-2.024 Traffic safety devices 26 I n �� 1Il�2 i 98-2.026 Intersections 98-2.014 Block length. Block lengths shall not exceed one thousand feet. (Ord. 98-2.002 Conformance to General Plan. 77-_) The design, layout, width, circulation, and other design aspects of streets in a sub- 98-2.016 Street Name Approval. Street division shall conform to the locations names shall be subject to the approval of which may have been shown on the Gen- the Planning Department. (Ord. 77- eral Plan r,.- in all cases shall provide advantageous development for the general 98-2.018 Street Name r Signs. The sub- planning area within which the subdivision divider shall furnish and install necessary lies. (Ord. 77- street name signs in accordance with details approved by the- Public Works 98-2.004 Reserve strips. Reserve strips Department. (Ord. 77- conUMng the access to streets or other public rights-of-way shall not be approved 98-2.020 Conditions requiring grade unless such strips are necessary, for the separation. U a subdivision borders on, or protection of the public welfare or prop- contains a railroad right-of-way, a limited erty rights. (Ord. 77- access freeway, or similar type of facil- ity, the advisory agency may require that 98-2.006 Designation on Final Alap or the street plan be considered in its rela- Parcel �. The Final MaporParcel Mag tion to the probability of grade separa- shall show the monument line of each tion. (Ord 77- street, the boundary of each street, in- cluding the width 'of the portion of any 98-2.022 Classification. The classes of fractional street being dedicated, the streets shall 59 as follo Thoroughfares, width of existing road rights-of-way from arterials, collectors, minors, industrial public records, and the widths on each streets and private roads. (Ord. 77- side of the monument line of whole streets. The widths and locations of adja- 98-2.024 Traffic safety devices. The cent streets shall be shown as determined subdlivideFshall. furnish and place such from public records. Whenever the Public traffic safety devices within, or adjacent Works Department or a city engineer has to, the subdivision as may be specified by established either the centerline or monu- the Public Works Department. (Ord. 77- ment line of the street and such informa- tion is made a public record, this'location and data shall be shown on the Final Map 98-2.026 Intersections. (a) Street inter- or Parcel Map. (Ord. 77- sections shall Be designed to provide reasonable approaches from side streets, 98-2.008 Angle of intersection. All and to provide smooth continuous flow of steeets shat 'intersect as nearly as possi- drainage without overflow across the in- ble of right angles.,(Ord. 77- tersection. (b) Valley gutters shall be provided to 98-2.010 Centerlines. Streets entering carry drainage across intersections only If on opposite sides of any given street shall undera.Tround drainage facilities cannOt have their centerlines directly opposite reasonably be provided. Valley guttc-0 each other, or the centerlines shall be shall not be permitted across arteriAl offset by at least one hundred fifty feet. streets. Valley gutters shall be on -A (Ord. 77- continuous minimum grade of one percent., reduction of which may be approved 1,Y 7, 98-2.012 Distance between streets. The the Public Works Department. (Ord. minimum distance'between streets enter- ing a thoroughfare shall be eight, hundred feet. .(Ord. 77- 27 00208" Chapter 98-4 98-6.014 Earth slopes in cuts or embankments WIDTH 98-6.016 Horizontal curves Sections: 98-6.002 Maximum limits. Maximum 98-4.002 Minimum requirements street grades shall not exceed the fol- 98-4.004 Measurement lowing limits: 98-4.006 Exceptions (1) Arterial streets, eight percent; 98-4.002 Minimum requirements. The (2) Collector streets, fifteen percent; minimum width of pavement and rights- (3) Minor streets, twenty percent; of-way of the various classes of streets (4) Private road, twenty percent; shall be as shown on the following table: (5) Driveway, twenty-five percent. (Ord. 77-_} Width of Pavement Width of Class w/curbs w/o curbs .Right-of-way 98-6.004 Minimum limits. The mini- Thoroughfares&arteri°' Two-lane 40 feet 60 feet mum uniform grade or aII classes of � Four-lane undivided 64 feet 64 feet :e4 feet. streets shall not be less than one percent, Four-lane divided 80 feet 100 feet Industrial two-lane 48 feet 68 feet except reduction to not less than one-half industrial four-tans 64 feet 56 feet of one percent may be authorized.b the Collector stresu 36 feet 36 fee[ 56 feet p Y y Minor streets 32 feet 36 feet 52 feet Public Works Department. (Ord. 77- ) Private roads 16 feet 25 feet _ 98-6.006 Pavement across intersection. (Ord. 77- ) The grade of the pavement surface across an intersection shall not be more than six 98-4.004 Measurement. The width of percent. (Ord. 77- ) roadway shall be measured normal to the ` centerline between the top face of the 98-6.008 Streets entering intersection. curbs, or edges of the pavement, not The centerline grade o each street enter- including roadside ditches. (Ord. 77- ) ing an intersection shall not be more than - six percent within a distance of thirty 98-4.006 Exceptions. Exceptions to the feet from the nearest curb line of the widths set forth in Section 98-4.002, intersected street. (Ord. 77-_) because of terrain conditions in hillside areas, shall be considered on the basis of 98-6.010 Vertical curves. Changes of cross-sections and other evidence to be grade in vertical alignment of streets submitted by the subdivider. (Ord. 777 shall be `made with parabolic vertical• curves. The design of such curves shall be in accordance with standards outlined in Chapter 98-6 the California Division of Highways "Highway Design Manual". GRADES (a) "Stopping sight distances shall be provided for the following design speeds: Sections: (1) Arterial and industrial streets, for- . 98-6.002 Maximum limits ty miles per hour; 98-6.004 Minimum limits (2) Collector streets, thirty miles per 98-6.006 Pavement across intersec- hour; tion (3) Minor streets, twenty miles per 98-6.008 Street entering intersec- hour; tion (4) Private roads, fifteen miles per 98-6.010 Vertical curves hour. 98-6.012 Minimum length of ver- (b) "Headlight sight distancen shall be tical curve i provided for sag vertical curves in actor- 28 00209 t dance with these requirements; except Article 98-8.2 where installation of street lights elimi- 7 '—"De ign -" nates any sight restriction due to lighting. (Ord. 77- ) 98-8.202 General. The structural design of the pavement includes the determina- 98-6.012 Minimum length of • vertical tion of the thickness and type of subbase, curve. The minimum length of a, vertical base,.and surfacing to be placed over the curve shall be fifty feet for minor streets basement soil according to an accepted and private roads, one hundred feet -for method used by the Public Works Depart- collector streets, :and two hundred feet ment. The Public Works Department shall for arterials. (Ord..77- ) specify the structural design for the streets. (Ord. 77- ) 98-6.014 Earth 'slopes in cuts or em- bankments. Earth slopes in cuts or em- 98-8.204 Soil tests. The subdivider, at bank`ment sections shall not be steeper his expense, may make tests of the soil than one and one=half feet horizontal to over which the surfacing and base is to be one foot vertical, unless steeper slopes constructed and furnish the test reports to have been approves! based on a report sub- the Public Works Department for use in mitted by a soil engineer. The soil report determining a preliminary structural de-- shall be filed with the Public Works sign of the roadbed. Tests and pavement Department. (Ord. 77- ) structural design will be made by the Public Works Department after the pay- 98-6.016 Horizontal curves. ment of the inspection fee. (Ord. 77- } (a) Changes in direction of the streets shall be made' with horizontal circular 98-8.206 Thickness of base material and curves, with the edges of the pavement surfacing. In no case shall the thickness and curb lines parallel to and equidistant the base material be less than five-tenths ` from the centerline of the right-of-way. of one foot, nor shall the thickness of (b) The radius of curvature in the center- asphalt concrete surfacing be less than line of the street shall not be less than: fifteen-hundredths of a foot. (Ord. 77- (1) Arterial street, six hundred fifty ) feet; (2) Collector street, two hundred feet; 98-8.208 Crown. The pavement crown (3) Minor street, seventy-five feet; and geometric design of the street cross- (4) Private road, twenty-five feet. section shall be shown and dimensioned on (Ord. 77- } the improvement plans, and shall conform to accepted design standards. The mini- Chapter 98-8 mum cross-slope shall be two percent. On street grades over six percent, a five _ PAVEMENT percent cross-slope shall be provided adja- cent to the curb and gutter for a distance Article 98-8.2 Design of not less than ten feet from the face of Sections: the curb, reduction of which may be. 98-8.202 General approved by the Public Works Depart- 98-8.204 Soil tests ment. Crown requirements are waived for 98-8.206 Thickness of base mater- private roads. (Ord. 77- ) ial and surfacing 98-8.208 Crown 29 0 210 l Chapter 98-10 permanent survey monuments at the loca- tions specified on the filed subdivision STREET TREES map. The ,monuments and appurtenances shall conform to approved standards and Sections: details prescribed by the Public Works 98-10.002 Removal Department. (Ord. 77- ) 98-10.004 Approval of species and planting. 912-2.004 Allowable error. The allow- 98-10.006 Encroachment permit able field survey error shall not exceed required. one part in five thousand in distance, or thirty seconds in angular measurement. 98-10.002 Removal. All trees con- (Ord. 77- ) f icting with the grading, utilities, or other improvements, or overhanging the 912-2.006 Establishment of survey sidewalk or pavement so as to. form a measurements. Establishment of all sur- nuisance or hazard, shall be removed or vey measurements shall be certified to in trimmed to eliminate such nuisance or writing by the engineer to the Public hazard. (Ord 77- ) Works Department prior to acceptance of street improvements. (Ord. 77- ) 98-10.004 Approval of spedies and planting: Trees to be planted along the 912-2.008 Drainage easements. Along _ street within the right-of-way shall be of all portions o natural channels or water- such species and be planted in such lora- courses within or bordering upon the tions as may be approved by the Public subdivision, all angle points and inter- Works Department. (Ord. 77- ) sections at lot lines or drainage easements shall be marked on the ground in such a 98-10.006 Encroachment permit. An en- manner as to be readily identified on croachment permit shall be obtained from visual inspection as those which appear the Public Works Department for street upon the Final Map or Parcel Map. (Ord. tree planting. (Ord:77- ) 77- ) Division 912 Division 914 SURVEY MONUMENTS • DRAINAGE Chapters Chapters . 912-2 General Providions 914-2 Minimum Requirements 914-4 Appurtenances 'in Public Chapter 912-2 Rights-of-Way 914-6 Open Channels and Con- GENERAL PROVISIONS duits 914-8 Levees Sections: 914-10 Easements 912-2.002 Conformance to approved 914-12 Miscellaneous standards 912-2.00.1 Allowable error Chapter 914-2 912-2.006 Establishment of survey measurements MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 912-2.008 Drainage easements Sections.- 912-2.002 ections;912-2.002 Conformance to approved 914-2.002 Protection from surface standards. The subdivider shall construct waters n! 41 • 30 nt��Cj.•_� .i. C 914-2.004 Adequate storm drainage subdivision shall be designed to adequately facilities convey the storm water runoff from the 914-2.006 Surface water flowing ultimate development of the drainage from subdivision basin or watershed lying within and above 914-2.008 Surface water flowing to the subdivision. subdivision. (b) Wherever surface waters must be 914-2.010 Storm water disposal re- conveyed beyond the boundaries of the strictions subdivision in order to discharge into a 914-2.012 Runoff quantity. deter- natural watercourse or to an existing mination adequate storm drainage facility, the sub- 914-2.014 Drainage facilities -Mini- divider shall comply with. either subsee- mum capacities tions (c), (d) or (e), prior to filing of the 914-2.016 CIosed conduit require- Final Map or Parcel Map. ments (c) The subdivider shall deposit with the 914-2.018 Channel design standards Public Works Department a copy of a duly recorded drainage release from the adja- 914-2.002 Protection from surface cent property owners in a form and waters. All portions of the subdivision content acceptable to the County Coun- shall be protected from flood hazard, sel, accepting the flow of surface waters inundation, sheet overflow and ponding of from the subdivision onto and over that storm waters, springs and all other sur- property, or the detention and ponding of face waters. All finished floors shall be surface waters upon that property, with- above the water surface of a. 100-year out liability by the county for damages • frequency storm runoff. (Ord. 77-� ) occurring therefrom. Such releases shall be obtained from all property owners 914-2.004 Adequate storm drainage between the boundaries of the subdivision facilities. The design of all improvements and the point at which the surface waters within the subdivision shall be such that will enter a natural watercourse having all surface waters occuring within the definable bed and banks or an existing subdivision, as well as all surface waters adequate storm drainage facility. flowing onto and/or through the subdivi- (d) The subdivider shall deposit with the sion, shall be conveyed through the sub- Public Works Department a copy of a duly division without damage to any improve- recorded grant of a drainage easement to ment, building site, or dwelling which may the county from the property owner(s). be constructed within the subdivision. Such a document shall be obtained from Storm drainage facilities within the subdi- all property owners between the bound- vision shall be designed to adequately aries of the subdivision and the point at convey the storm water runoff from the which the surface 'waters will be dis- ultimate development of the drainage charged into a natural watercourse or an basin or watershed. (Ord. 77-�) existing adequate storm drainage facility, or the area upon which surface waters will 914-2.006 Surface water flowing from be detained and ponded. subdivision. (e) The subdivider shall present written a Surface waters flowing from the evidence which proves to the satisfaction subdivision in any.form or manner shall be of the Public Works Department that it is conveyed without damage to any improve- not feasible to obtain by negotiation from meet, building, or dwelling to a natural the property owner(s) either a drainage watercourse having a definable bed and release or a grant of drainage easement. banks, or to an existing adequate storm The Public Works Department may then drainage facility. Storm drainage facili- authorize the subdivider to institute con- ties to be constructed outside of the demnation proceedings to obtain the ease- 31 ment. (1) Major drainage channels and conduits (f) Whenever it shall appear to the shall have sufficient capacity to contain a subdivider, that those heretofore men- fifty-year frequency of average recur- { tioned matters relating to the acquisition rence interval runoff; r of drainage releases and easements, (2) Secondary drainage channels and and/or the institution of condemnation conduits shall have sufficient'capacity to proceedings, may be more expeditiously contain a twenty-five year frequency of administered by the County of Contra average recurrence interval runoff; Costa, the subdivider may request that (3) Minor drainage facilities, channels the Board of Supervisors direct the Public and conduits shall have sufficient capacity Works Department to assume the respons- to contain-a ten-year frequency of aver- ibility for proceeding with these matters. age recurrence interval runoff. (Ord. 77- The Board, upon such terms and conditions ) as they specify may authorize the Depart- ment to act on behalf of the subdivider in 914-2.016 Closed conduit requirements. complying with subsection (b). (Ord. 77- Waters within street areas shall be placed in closed conduits when the maximum depth of computed flow exceeds the capa- 914-2.008 Surface water flowing to sub- city of the gutter or creates a traffic division. Whenever surface waters flow- hazard or endangers property. 'Storm Ing o or onto the subdivision in any form water in natural or artificial drainage or manner will be detained or ponded on channels shall be placed in closed conduits adjacent property(s) as the result of im- or concrete lined channels where the provements constructed by the subdivider, quantity does not exceed eighty cubic feet the subdivider shall comply with Section per second except that the advisory 914-2.006 prior to the filing of the Final agency may recommend that an existing t Map or Parcel Map. (Ord. 77- ) natural watercourse endowed with signifi- cant natural beauty in the form of trees, 914-2.010 Storm water disposal re- shrubs, or scenic attraction may be uti- strictions. Storm waters flowing from the lized for an open drainage facility with subd�iv n in any form or manner shall such drainage improvements as may be not be permitted to flow into any water designated by the Public Works Depart- conveyance facility of the Contra Costa ment. Such areas shall either be _dedi- Canal, nor into any other water*convey- cated as easements or designated on the anee or impounding facility for domestic Final 1VIap or Parcel Map as. drainage water consumption: (Ord. 77- ) reserves upon and within which no im- provements or structures. of any nature 914-2.012 Runoff quantity determina- shall be constructed without the written tion. Runoff quantities shall be deter- consent of the Public Works Department. mined by methods consistent with current (Ord. 77- ) engineering practices using basic data supplied by the Public Works Department 914-2.018 Channel designstandards. for the frequency of the average recur- Design of drainage channels, conduits, and rence interval stipulated in Section 914- appurtenances shall conform with design 2.014. (Ord. 77- ) standards of the Public Works Depart- ment. (Ord. 77- ) 914-2.014 Drainage facilities-Minimum capacities. Drainage facilities directly Chapter 914-4 affecting the subdivision shall have the following minimum capacities: APPURTENANCES ISI PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 32 00213 Article 914-4.2 Culverts 914-4.402 Discharge to roadside Sections: - ditc es. o concentrated flow of storm 914-4.202 Under driveway culverts waters from a subdivision shall be dis- 914-4.204 Street crossing culverts charged into a roadside ditch. (Ord. 77- 914-4.206 Culverts outside the road- ) way 914-4.404 Roadside ditch sections. Article 914-4.4 Roadside Ditches Roadside ditch sections shall be subject to - Sections: the approval of the Public Works Depart- 914-4.402 Discharge to roadside ment as to shape, size, .gradient, lining, ditches and location within the road right-of-way, 914-4.404 Roadside ditch sections and shallhave the required hydraulic 914-4.406 Purpose of Roadside capacity. (Ord. 77- ) ditches 914-4.408 Roadside ditch gradients 914-4.406 Purpose of roadside ditches. Roadside ditches and gutters shall be Article 914-4.6 Miscellaneous provided to carry the drainage from the Sections: road and tributary lands without damage 914-4.602 Piping requirements to the roadbed or abutting property. (Ord. 914-4.604 Storm drain inlets 77- ) 914-4.606 Drainage structure to al- low for tidal action and 914-4.408 Roadside ditch gradients. _flood stage The maximum gradient or earth roadside ditches shall not exceed four percent, nor Article 914-4.2 be less than one percent. The minimum Culverts gradient for lined roadside ditches shall not be less than one percent. (Ord.. 77-- 914-4.202 Under drivewav culverts. ) Culverts under driveway entrances for roadside ditches shall be adequate to Article 914-4.6 carry the design flow, but shall not be less Miscellaneous than twelve inches inside diameter. (Ord. 77- ) 914-4.602 Piping requirements. All corrugated steel and aluminum pipe in- 914-4.204 Street crossing culverts. tended for- use within the roadway shall be Culverts crossing the street shall be of a of the gage recommended by the manu size adequate to carry the design flow, facturer and approved by the Public Works but shall not be smaller than fifteen Department for the cover and service inches inside diameter for concrete or conditions required. Corrugated steel and eighteen inches inside diameter for cor' aluminum pipe shall be bituminous coated. rugated metal pipe or aluminum pipe. where required by the Public Works De- (Ord. 77-�) partment. Additional protective coating or paving of metal pipes may be required 914-4.206 Culverts outside the road- for severe service conditions. The gage of way. Culverts for use outside the road- pipe proposed at each location shall be way may be of any approved type and noted on the improvement plans. (Ord. strength to meet field conditions. (Ord. 7?_ ) 77- ) — 914-4.604 Storm drain inlets. Storm Article 914-4.4 'drain inlets shall be of a design approved Roadside Ditches . by the Public Works Department. Water 002,14 33 shall be directed into the storm drain inlet 914-6.008 Lined channels—Side slopes. without a reversal of direction of the flow Side slopes or linedc anne s e of the water. (Ord. 77- ) those specified by a soil engineer. (Ord. 77- ) 914-4.606 Drainage structures to allow for tidal action and flood stage. Drainage 914-6.010 Closed conduits—Minimum structures shall allow for tidal action and flow linea Minimum flow line gradients flood stage where applicable. The hydrau- Tor close d conduits shall be. not less than lic pressure elevation in any storm drain- three one-thousandth foot per foot. (Ord. age system shall. be at least one and 77- ) twenty-five-hundredths feet below the top of any inlet grate or manhole. (Ord. 77- 914-6.012 Closed conduits or lined channels—Outlet velocity. Where the outlet velocity from a closed conduit or lined channel exceeds the maximum Chapter 914-6 allowable velocity for the earth channels receiving the flow, suitable protective -OPEN CHANNELS AND CONDUITS works such as riprap or a stilling basin shall be provided. (Ord. 77-_) Sections: 914-6.002 Earth channels - Maxi- 914-6.014 Clearance of natural chan- mum design velocities nels. The subdivider shall, within the 914-6.004 Earth channels - Minimum boundaries of the subdivision, selectively -velocities clear all natural channels and water- 914-6.006 Earth -channels - Side courses of all structures, trees, brush, and slopes debris which would interfere with or 914-6.008 Lined channels - Side obstruct the flow of storm waters. (Ord. slopes 77-_) 914-6.010Closed conduits.'-- Mini- mum.flow line Chapter 914-8 914-6.012 Closed conduits or lined channels - Outlet velocity LEVEES 914-6.014 Clearance of natural channels Sections: 914-8.002 Compliance requirements 914-6.002 Earth channels—Maximum 914-8.004 Toe and slope require- . design velocities. Maximum design velo- ments cities for natural or artificial earth chan- 914-8.006 Top width nels shall be those specified by a soil 914-8.008 Earth embankments engineer in the- preliminary soil report. 914-8.010 Degree of protection (Ord. 77- ) 914-8.012 Approval of design and construction 914-6.004 Earth channels—Minimum 914-8.014 Control and maintenance velocities. Minimum velocities at design . . capacity for earth channels shall be three. 914-8.002 Compliance requirements. feet per second. (Ord. 77- ) Adequate levees shall be provided in compliance with Section 914-2.002. (Ord. . 914-6.006 Earth channels—Side slopes. 77- ) Side slopes for improved earth channels shall be those specified by a soil engineer, 914-8.004 Toe and slope requirements. but in no instance shall side slopes be For levees used in combination with open steeper than one and one-half horizontal channels and waterways, the toe of the to one vertical.-(Ord. 77- ) levee on the water side shall bo placed at 34 001 I ' least two feet back from the top of the County, levees shall provide protection bank of channel or waterway. Levee from tides, flood flows in the Sacramento slopes shall not be steeper than two and San Joaquin Rivers and all waterways horizontal to one vertical. (Ord. 77- ) tributary thereto, and waves created by wind action. The basis for flood protection 914-8.006 Top. width. Top width of shall be the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' outer or circumferential levees con- standard project flood, approximately strueted for the protection of reclaimed equivalent to a recurrence interval of two lands shall be not less than eighteen feet. hundred years. Tops of curbs shall be not (Ord. 77- ) lower than elevation 9.5 U.S.G.S. datum. (Ord. 77- ) 914-8.008 Earth embankments. Earth embankments necessary for protection of 914-8.012 Approval of'design and con- any portion of the subdivision from sur- struction. Approval of uhe- design and face waters and - not adjacent 1 to open construction of all levees within those channels or waterways shall have mini- areas described in Section 914-8.010 (2), (3) mum top widths of five feet. Embank- and (4), shall be obtained from the U.S.. ment slopes shall be the same as for Army Corps of Engineers, California State levees. (Ord. 77- ) Reclamation Board, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commis- 914-8.010 Degree of protection. The sion, and any active operating local recla- degree of protection for which levees mation district within whose boundari2s shall be designed shall be as follows: levees are to be constructed. (Ord 77- (1) For watercourses and channels, ) < levees shall provide the degree of pro- tection as specified in Section 914-2.012; 914-8.014 Control and maintenance. (2) For those areas to be protected from The jurisdiction for the control and main- waters of. San Francisco Bay and San tenance of all required levees shall be as Pablo Bay from the southerly and westerly determined by the county, except as to boundaries of Contra Costa County.to the areas where reclamation districts or dis- state highway bridge at Carquinez Strait, tricts with similar powers have such re- levees shall provide protection from tides sponsibilities, in which case the district and from waves created by wind action. having that responsibility shall present Tops of curbs shall be not lower then assurances satisfactory to the county that elevation 7.5 U.S.G.S. datum; they have the necessary means and will (3) For those areas to be protected from perform the continued necessary mainte- the waters of Carquinez Strait and Suisun nance of' those levees protecting the. Bay from the state highway bridge at subdivision. (Ord. 77- ) Carquinez Strait to Simmons Point on 'Chipps Island, levees shall provide protec- Chapter 914-10 tion from tides,•flood flows in the Sacra- mento and San Joaquin Rivers, and waves EASEMENTS created by wind action. The basis for flood protection shall be the U.S. Army Article 914-10.2 Closed Conduits Corps of Engineers' standard project Sections: flood, approximately equivalent to a re- 914-10.202 Closed conduits - Mini- currence interval of two hundred years. mum widths of easements Tops of curbs shall be not lower than elevation 8.5 U.S.G.S. datum; Article 914-10.4 Open Channels (4) For those areas within the delta area Sections: from Simmons Point on Chipps Island to 914-10.402 Improved channels the easterly boundaries of Contra Costa width of easements 35 0021.6 t Improved channels - width(` rop (Feet) E"""""' 914-10.404 Im p Width (Feet) (Minimum width-Feet) !, Access easements 0-10 12 one side, 3 other side if within subdivision 914-10.406 Unimproved channels - 10-30 15 one side, 3 other side if within sufldivision Width of easements 30-40 18 one side, 3 other side if within subdivision 40-50 T I1 one side, 3 other side it within subdivision 914-10.408 Unimproved channels - 50-60 15 each side if within subdivision 60-70 13 each side it within subdivision Structure setback 80 and above u each side if within subdivision 914-10.410 Structures and land- scaping within ease- ments (b) For lined channels, access easements shall be provided along the banks as Article 914-10.6 Levees and Ponding follows: Areas Channel Lining Access Easements Sections:. Top Width Minimum Width 914-10.602 Easements and. ponding (Feet). (Feet) areas 3-10 3 one side 6 other side Article 914-10.2 10-15 6 one side 12 other side Closed Conduits 15-30 6 one side 15 other side 30-40 6 one side 18 other side 914-10.202 Closed conduits--Minimum 40-50 6 one side 21 other side50 and above same as earth channels - widths of easements. Minimum widths of drainage easements for closed conduits (c) Access easements shall be graded in a shall be equal to the outside diameter or manner so as to be usable by vehicular width of the conduit plus three feet on maintenance equipment but need not be each side, but in no location less than ten surfaced. Minimum radius of centerline feet. Drainage easements shall not be of access easements shall be forty feet. divided longitudinally by lot lines. (Ord. All access easements along channels shall 77- ) be provided with ingress easements from a public way and be usable by vehicular Article 914-10.4 "' maintenance equipment. The minimum Open Channels width of the ingress easements shall be twelve feet. Where trees in place on and 914-10.402 Improved channels - Width adjacent to channel banks are to remain, of Easements. The width of 'drainage adequate additional vehicular access ease- easements for excavated earth channels ment width shall be dedicated. (Ord. 77- and channels greater than three feet in - width that are lined with concrete or other materials, shall contain the full 914-10.406 Unim roved channels - outside top width of channel, including Width of Easements. The width of drain-- lining and the required adjacent access age easements for unimproved channels easements. For lined channels having a with side slopes steeper than 2:1 (2- top width less than three feet the mini- horizontal to 1-vertical) shall. be deter- mum width of drainage easement shall be mined by a line measured from the toe of ten feet. (Ord. 77- ) t slope a distance of twice the channel depth plus the appropriate top of bank 914-10.404 Improved channels - Access setback as follows: easements. a For excavated earth channels, within Channel Depth Top of Bank Set-Back the subdivision, access easements shall be (Feet) (Minimum Width-Feet) provided along the banks as follows: 0-6 12 each side if within subdivision 6-12 15 each side if within subdivision 12-18 IS each side if within subdivision ` 18 and above 21 each side if within stbilivision ,• n ,�_�.rl1 ` . 36 (1 The width of drainage easements for Article 914-12.2 r unimproved channels with side slopes flat- Ponding Areas ter than 2:1 (2-hgrizontal to 1-vertical) shall be the channel to width plus the P P 914-12.202 Ponding areas — When appropriate top of bank setback. (Ord. permitted. Disposal of storm,water drain- 77- ) age by means of ponding areas •may be 914-10.408 Unimproved channels - Permitted only with the approval of the _ Public Works Department, after study of • Structure setback. . the proposed disposal basin topography For unimproved channels exceeding 21- and soil characteristics and only where no feet in depth a structure setback line shall other reasonable method* of disposal is be determined by measuring from the toe feasible. (Ord. 77- of 7 of slope a distance of three times the channel depth. If the structure' setback Article 914-12.4 line falls outside of the drainage easement Subdrainage the Developer shall grant development rights to the county in a form that forbids 914-12.402 Subdrainage — Where re- location of structures, other than drainageuq ired. Subdrain facilities shall be pro- structures, within the setback area with- vided where specified by the soil engineer out approval of the Public Works Depart- controlling the work and other areas ment. (Ord. 77- ) where deemed necessary by the county to prevent sliding or settlement of the earth 914-10.410 Structures and landscaping surface. Facilities will be required to within easements. No permanent strut- convey the subdrainage to an approved tures of any OR other than drainage point of discharge. (Ord. 77- ) structures may be constructed within or ' over any drainage or access easement. Division 916 Landscaping including trees and shrubs may be accomplished within easements WATER AND SEWERS upon approval by the Public Works De- partment. (Ord. 77- ) Chapters: 916-2 Water Article 914-10.6 916-4 Sewers '17— Levees and Ponding Areas Chapter 916-2 914-10.602 Easements for levees and - ponding areas. All levees and all ponding WATER areas shall be completely contained within drainage easements. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: Chapter 914-2 916-2.002 Adequate Supply 916-2.002 Adequate Supply. An ade- MISCELLANEOUS quate approved water supply shall be provided to serve all of the proposed Article 914-12.2 Ponding Areas subdivision. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: 914-12.202 Ponding Areas When Chapter 916-4 permitted ' - Article 914-12.4 Subdrainage SEWERS Sections: Article 916-4.2 Sewerage 914-12.402 Subdrainage-Where re- Sections: .. quired 916-4.202 Sewerage requirements 00 37 21 � _ Article 916-4.4 Sanitary Sewers and Chapter 918-2 Sewage Treatment Plants GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: 916-4.402 Sewer system and sew- Sections: age treatment plant 918-2.002 Required by hazardous construction conditions 918-2.004 Required where street Article 916-4.2 crosses watercourses or Sewerage drainage structures 918-2.006 Required along outside 914-4.202 Sewerage requirements. boundaries' of open lined Sewerage shall be provided to the sub- channel easements division by a public sanitation district or utility having adequate plant and facil- 918-2.002 Required by hazardous con- ities. If, based on evidence submitted, the ditions. Fences shall be constructed by advisory agency finds that it is not feasi- the subdivider where a condition hazard- ble to construct, install, or connect to s ous to persons . or property may exist. sewerage system it may refer any request (Ord. 77- ) for an alternate means of sewage disposal to the County Health Department. (Ord. 918-2.004 Required where street 77- ) crosses watercourses or drainage struc- tures. Wherever a street crosses over a Article 916-4.4 watercourse or open channel, fences shall ` Sanitary Sewers and Sewage be provided around the head walls, end Treatment Plants walls and other appurtenances of bridges or drainage structures, and shall be of a ' 916-4.402 Sewer system and sewage type, height and location as required by treatment plant construction. In those the Public Works Department. (Ord. 77- areas served by a sanitation district.under ) the jurisdiction of the county, as distin- guished from a local sanitary district, all 918-2.006 Required along outside boun- sewage treatment facilities and appurte- daries o open lined channel easements. nances shall be constructed in accordance Fences shall be installed along the outside with the requirements of the Public Works boundaries of all easements containing Department and under the inspection of open lined channels having a depth of one the Public Works Department subsequent and one-half feet or more. Fences shall to payment of all required fees and be of the chain-link type, six feet in charges. Sanitary sewers to be con- height, and provided with gates at appro- structed in areas_ other than those under priate locations. (Ord. 77- ) the jurisdiction of the county, shall be submitted to the appropriate agency for Division 920 review. (Ord. 77- ) PARK DEDICATIONS Division 918 FENCES Chapters: 920-2 General Chapters: 920-4 Requirements 918-2 General Provisions 920-6 Standard for Area and Fees 38 00219 920-8 Private Space : 920-4.004 Single parcel development. 920-10 Use and Time Limits As a con tion of approval of any permit 920-12 Procedures to build al principal residential structure, including but not limited to a multiple family structure or trailer (mobile home) f' Chapter 920-2 park; an owner shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or do a combination of GENERAL both,,for public park or recreational pur- poses in accordance with the same stand- ards as if a final map or parcel map were Sections: required. (Ord. 77- ) 920-1.002 Authority 920-2.004 Plan 920-4.006 Exemptions. Subdivisions 920-2.006 Regulation containing less than five 5) parcels and not used for residential purposes shall be 920-2.002 Authority. This division is exempted from the requirements of this enacted pursuant to the authority granted section; provided however, that if a build- by Government Code Section 66477 and ing permit is requested for construction of the Constitution of the State of:Califor- a residential structure or structures on nia. (Ord. 77- ) one or more of the parcels the fee shall be required to be paid by the owner of each 920-2.004 Plan. The park and recrea- such parcel as a condition to the issuance tional facilities, or which dedication of of such permit. (Ord. 77- ) land andLOr payment of.a fee are required, < shall be accordance with the.Recrea- tion Element of the General Plan. (Ord. Chapter 920-6 77- ) t` STANDARDS FOR AREA AND FEES 920-2.006 Regulation. The Board may from time to time, by resolution, issue Sections: regulations to establish administration, 920-6.002 Dedication procedures, interpretation and policy di- 920-6.004 Amount of fee rection under this division. (Ord. 77- ) 920-6.002 Dedication. The total area required to be dedicated shall be com- Chapter 920-4 puted by multiplying the number of dwell- ing units to be included in the develop-. REQUIREMENTS ment by five hundred square feet. As used in this division,, "dwelling unit" means Sections: a building or a portion thereof, or a • 920-4.0.02 Subdivision mobile home, designed for residential.oc- 920-4.004 Single parcel development cupation by one person or a.group of two 920-4.006 Exemptions or more persons living together as a domestic unit. (Ord. 77- ) 920-4.002 Subdivisions. As a condition of approval of s preliminary or final 920-6.004 Amount of fee. When fees development plan, tentative or final map are to be paid in lieu of land dedication, or parcel map (which are hereinafter such fees shall be $300 per dwelling unit. referred to as development), the devel- A combination of fee payment and land oper of land for residential use, excluding dedication is permissible if approved by that land which is exempt as provided in the Planning Agency. (Ord. 77- ) the Subdivision Map Act, shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or do a Chapter 920-8 combination of both, for public park or recreational purposes. (Ord. 77-_ ) PRIVATE SPACE 39 n nncic, n �^ Sections: or other recreational improvements that 920-8.002 Partial Credit for private will meet' 'the specific recreation park space. needs of the future residents of the area: 920-8.004 Standards ' Criteria List Acres 1. Children's play apparatus area , .50 - .75 920-8.002 Partial Credit for private 2. Landscape park-like and quiet .50 - 1.00 space. Where private area for park and area . 3. Family Picnic area .25 - .75 recreational purposes is provided in a -4. Game court area .25 - .50 proposed development and such area is to 5. Turf playfield 1.00 - 3.00 be privately owned and maintained by the 6. Swim pool (42' x 75' with .25 - .50 adjacent deck and lawn area) future owner(s) of the development, par- , 7. Recreation center building .15 - .25 tial credit may be given by the planning (Ord..77- ) agency not . to exceed 50% against the requirement of 'land dedication or pay- ment of fees in lieu thereof if the Chapter 920-10 planning agency finds that it is in the public interest to do so and that all the USE AND TIME LIMITS standards set forth in Section 920-8.004 are met. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: 920-10.002 Use of land and fees. 920-8.004 Standards. There standards 920-10.004 Establishment and de- are: velopment time. (1) That yards, court areas, :setbacks 920-10.006 Hold or transfer L. and other open areas, required to be maintained by the zoning and building 920-10.002 Use of Iand and fees. The ordinances and regulations shall not be land, fees, or combination thereo are to included in the computation of such pri- be used only for the purpose of providing vate areas; and park or recreation facilities which will (2) That the private ownership and serve future residents of such develop- maintenance of the area is adequately ment; but if the County General Plan or a provided for by recorded written agree- Specific Plan contemplates a larger or ment, covenants or restrictions; and more significant recreation development (3) That the use of the private area is (such as an area or community park) which restricted for park and recreational pur- will serve an area including the develop- poses by recorded covenants which run ment, the dedicated land or fees.may be with the land in favor of the future devoted to such use. (Ord. 77- } owners of property within the tract and which cannot be amended or eliminated 920-10.004 Establishment and develop- without the consent of the county, or its ment time. The planning agency, in successor; and agreement with the local agency having (4) That the. proposed private area is park responsibility, if available, shall as- reasonably adaptable for use for park or sure the establishment and development recreational purposes, taking into consid- of the park and recreational facilities as eration such factors as size, shape, topo- the area develops and such facilities graphy, geology, access and location; and become necessary. (Ord. 77- ) (5) That facilities proposed for the area are in substantial accordance with 920-10.006 Hold or transfer. All land the provisions of the Recreational Ele- so dedicated or fees paid shall be held by ment of the General Plan; and the county only for such purpose, but the (6) That the area for which credit is county may transfer such land and/or fees given is a minimum of two contiguous to a local agency having authority to acres and provides a minimum of four of provide park and recreation services in the local park basic elements listed below, the area. (Ord. 77- ) 40 1 ' Chapter 920-12 920-12.006 Prerequisite for approval of j Final Map, Parcel Map, or Building Per- PROCEDURES mit. Land: When land is to be dedicated, it Sections: shall be offered for dedication in substan- 920-12.002 General tially the same manner as for streets and 920-12.004 Decision-Factors other easements. 920-12.006 Prerequisite for appro- (b) Fees: When a fee is required, it shall val of Final Map, Parcel be paid to the county prior to approval of Map, or Building Permit the Final- .Map, Parcel Map, or Building 920-12.008 Trust-Administration Permit, whichever first occurs. Fees shall 920-12.010 Agency for develop- be placed in a local park or recreation ment and maintenance facilities Trust Fund. (Ord. 77- ) 920-12.012 Refunds "- 920-12.014 Exemptions 920-12.008 Trust-Administration. The land and fees shall be held in trust by the 920-12.002 General. At the time of fill a tentative map—or other 'develop- county until the county transfers such p- responsibility to a county service area, ment for approval, the developer shall, as district, city, or association. If the a part of such filing, indicate whether he Recreation Element of the General Plan prefers to dedicate land for park and does not indicate the area of benefit and recreation purposes, or to pay a fee in lieu contribution for the specific park required thereof, or do a combination of these. If to serve a development, an appropriate he prefers to dedicate land, he shall amendment will be, prepared to so deli- suggest the specific land. (Ord. 77- ) neate an area, or a Specific Plan for such 920-12.004 Decision-Factors. At the area may be developed. (Ord. 77-_) time of initial development approval, the 920-12.010 Agency for development planning agency shall determine whether and maintenance. The planning agency to require a dedication of land within the shall designate a public agency (city, development, payment of a fee in lieu service area, district or other) to be thereof, or a combination of both. In responsible for development and mainte- making this determination, the agency nance of the park. If no such agency is shall consider the following factors: available to assume such responsibility, (1) Lands offered for dedication will the planning agency shall require the, substantially comply with the Recreation developer to annex to or to form an Element of the General Plan; appropriate agency, unless waived by the (2) ` The topography, soils, soil stability, planning agency. When such a public drainage, access, - location and general agency is designated for the area, the land utility of land in the development avail- and fees may be conveyed to such agency able for dedication; by the county for the purposes herein (S) The size and shape of the develop- enumerated. (Ord. 77- ) ment and land available for dedication; (4) How much land consisting of school 920-12.012 Refunds. playgrounds or public park lands is avail- (a) If a ffinal subdivision map, or parcel able for combination with dedicated lands map is vacated, and if the county still in the formation of local park and recrea- retains the land or fees, and if the tion facilities; and applicant so requests, the board may order (5) The space or local recreation facil- return to him of such land or fees. ities to be privately owned and maintained (b) If a building permit is cancelled or by future residents of the development. voided, and if the county stillretains the ;:. (Ord. 77- ) fee, and if the applicant so requests, the 41 0 l2 2 board may order return to him of such Article 924-4.4 Tentative Maps fee. (Ord. 77- ) Sections: 924-4.402 Filing for resubdivision , 920-12.014 Exemptions. A permit to repair or rebuild a dwelling unit which was Article 924-4.2 damaged by fire, Act of God, or other Maps natural disaster shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter if the permit is 924-4.202 Filing. After a prefiling applied for within one year of the damage conference with the Planning Department or destruction. (Ord. 77- ) and the Public Works Department, 12 copies of maps providing for reversion to Division 924 acreage shall be filed with the Planning Commission and shall be in the form of a REVERSION TO ACREAGE BY MAP Final Map or Parcel Map, dependent upon which was used to file the original sub- Chapters: division. (Ord. 77- ) 924.2 Planning Commission Autho- rity 924-4.204 Street and easement desig- 924-4 Procedure nation. Such a map shall delineate any streets or easements to be left in effect Chapter 924-2 after the reversion to acreage. (Ord: 77- PLANNING COMMISSION AUTHORITY 924-4.206 Bond, fee required. Any map Sections: so submitted shall be accompanied by: 924-2.002 Map approval (1) A guarantee of title in the amount of one thousand dollars for the benefit of the 924-2.002 Map approval. The Planning county, issued by a recognized title insur- Commission is the delegated authority to ance company; approve or disapprove maps in the form of (2) Evidence of nonuse of streets or a Final Map or a Parcel Map which easements; and provides for the reversion to acreage of (3) A filing fee as established or adopted land previously subdivided. (Ord.. 77- by the Board of Supervisors from time to time by resolution, no part of which shall be refundable. (Ord. 77- ) Chapter 924-4 924-4.208 Hearing. The Planning Com- PROCEDURE mission shall conduct its hearing in accor- dance with requirements of Government Article 924-4.2 Maps Code Sections 66499.11 through 66499.20- Sections: 1/2. (Ord. 77- ) 924-4.202 Filing 924-4.204 Street and easement des- 924-4.210 Planning Commission action. ignation The Planning Commission shall act upon 924-4.206 Bond, fee required the map within forty calendar days after 924-4.208 Hearing its next regular meeting, or such other 924-4.210 Planning Commission ac- time as mutually agreed upon by the tion subdivider and Planning Commission or 924-4.212 Certification the map shall be deemed disapproved n 42 02,23 unless the Planning Commission expressly continues the matter. (Ord. 77- 924-4.212 Certification. The map shat , be certHied by the County Surveyor as required by the Subdivision Map Act. The provisions-and fee for map checking as set forth in Section 94-4.602 shall be appli- cable to checking reversion to acreage maps prior to certification. (Ord. 77- 924-4.214 Filing for resubdivision. A Tentative Map for resubdivision: may be filed concurrently with the aforesaid re- version map. (Ord. 77- ) 10/27/77 ` 43 4' f 00224 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CMITRA COSTA COUtITY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ir. the Natter of Granting ) :44-1 F. Mygrant (Lazy M ) Ma tna) Permit to Install ) November 29, 1977 SG�oage• System and ) T, eatnlent Plant. ) The Board on August 3, 1976 having referred to the County Health Officer and Public Works Director the application of Mr. Robert F. Mygrant for a permit to install a sewage treatment facility to serve the Lazy M Marina located at Clifton Court Road and Italian Slough, Byron area; and The Board having received a November 21, 1977 report from the County Health Officer and Public Works Director advising that the proposed facility when constructed and operating properly will comply with the necessary requirements, and recommending that said permit be granted with the understanding that, following installation of said facility, operation will be maintained in accordance with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, discharge requirements (Order No. 76-138) and the requirements of the County Health Officer; and Supervisor N. C. Fanden having commented that this matter is s=latted to the appeal of Mr. Mygrant from the Planning Commission's revoeation, for nor-compliance with conditions, of Land Use Permit 2001-75 to establish a conLnercial boat harbor and a caretaker's mobile home in the Byron area; and Supervisor Fanden having noted that on May 10, 1977 the matter had been referred back to the Planning Commission for a six- month review period to allow Ifir. Mygrant to satisfactorily comply with the conditions of approval, that no report had yet been received, and having therefore moved that the Board take no action on the matter at this time, the motion died for lack of a second; and The Board members having further discussed the matter; On motion of Supervisor R. I. Schroder, seconded by Super- Visor E. H. Hasseltine, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommenda- tion of the Count; Health Officer and Public Works Director is APPROVED and tor. Mygrant is GRANTED a permit to install said sewage treatment facility. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. cc: Nr. R. F. Mygrant Mr. J. Coker, Attorney Fir. A:. Neison, .At t•orney Nr. u. Piantanida, Attorney CERTIFIED COPY Dir:::_:,or o'L Planning County Health Officer I certify that this Is a full, true Rr correct ofn of ". � tb� original dnrumPnt tvhirh i� on file in my nfUrn. County Building Inspector n.:: that it eta!; Ir;aw•d fi adn)'.•-tl by the hoard of suim-r,i-ors of Cons rt Costa County. California. on th-m .:a— shown. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON. County Cl-rk& :a-offlelo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. by- n"pti-y Clerk.., onice' IY'77 00425 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS ESC OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT November 29 1n the Matter of Bids ,for Provision of Weed Abatement Services . This being the time for the Board to receive bids for the provision of weed abatement services, bids were received and read by the Clerk as follows: 1. For Abatement by Discing and Dozing: Lawrence Johnson Spilker Tree Service, Inc. 2 . For Abatement by Plowing, Hoeing and Rubbish Removal: 0,-;born Spray Service Spilker Tree Service,- Inc. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Fire Chief of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for review and recommendation. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc :. CCC 'ire Protection Dist . VVitness my hand and the Sea) of the Board of • County Administrator Supervisors 1 axed this rl day of M03,0-1 9_7 7 J. R. Ol_SSON. Clerk BY f�l� 'sin,_� C:�)2ullaJkll( Deputy Cierk Helen C. Marshall 00220 H-24 4/77 15m 0 • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of Request for Increased Funding of Emergency Medical Services Program. The Board having received a November 15, 1977 letter from Mr. Stanley H. Chin, Dean of Natural Sciences, Los Medanos College, expressing concern with respect to the present limited level of funding allocated for the County's Emergency Medical Services (EMS) program for fiscal year 1977-1978 ; and Mr. Chin having advised that the college is involved in the EMS program because of its role as one of the training agencies within the program, but that it is not appropriate for the college to support the program in any other financial capacity, and having urged the Board to give consideration to increasing the present level of funding; IT IS By THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Los Medanos College Director, :'_uman Resources 5upervisors Agency affixed this 29th day of November 1977 County Health Officer County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk ai H-244/7715m n��� r ! In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 . 19 -27 In the Matter of Construction Bids for the Kitchen/Dining Fall Facility at the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center, Clayton Area. (4411-4061) The Public Works Director having received bids on November 3, 1977 for construction of the Kitcben/Dining Hall Facility at the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center in Clayton, and having found all bids to be excessive and beyond available funds; and. The Public Works Director having received a subsequent time extension for use of the grant funds provided by the Economic Development Administration; and The Public Works Director having this day recommended. that plans and specifications be revised, and that he be instructed to re—advertise for bids for said project; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public ,tiorks Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Bldgs and Grnds Supervisor cc: Public ;:'orks Department offixed this 29thday ofNovember 19 77 _ Nove Architectural Division b . Agenda Clerk County Sheriff-Coroner J. P. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy C!erk 0 2S H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 7J_ In the Matter of Release of Park Dedication Fees to the Kensington Community Service District The Clerk of the Board on October 25, 1977 pursuant to Board policy having referred to the 'Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee the request of the Kensington Community Service District for $4300 in park dedication funds to develop a children's play area at the Kensington Park in Kensington; and In a November 17, 1977 memorandum the Director of Planning having advised that the Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee had reviewed the request and recommends it be approved and the Auditor- Controller be authorized to release $4300 held in the Park Dedication Trust Fund (3255) to the Kensington Community Service District, in accor- dance with the July 28, 1975 agreement between the County and the Kensington Community Service District. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Planning Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors CC: County Administrator affixed this 29 thiay of November . 19 77 County Auditor-Controller Kensington Community Services District J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Planning Department By C 7 i Deputy Clerk Sandra L. Nielson 00229 H-24 3/76 15m t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra ostaIOCo G VEty, State Df oCalifornia AS ARTHE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT November 29 . 19 77 In the Matter of _ Approving First Amendment to Architectural Services Agreement for Remodeling of Classrooms at Fire College and Remodeling of Station No. 8, Concord. (7100-4698) The Board of Supervisors, as ex-officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute the First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services with John C. Wilson, Architect, EI Sobrante, for design of the Remodeling of Classrooms at Fire College and for the Remodeling of Station No. 8 in Concord. The Amendment provides for enlarging the project scope and also provides for a maximum architectural fee of $22,000. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supervisors affixed this 29th day of_ November 19 77 cc: Public Works Department Agenda Clerk Architectural Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By //• 1 ll1 —y , Deputy Clerk J. Dye N.PODS County Administrator P. Burton Architect �l H-24 3/76 15m 00230 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE REMODELING OF CLASSR094S AT FIRE COLLEGE AND STATION NU:OBER 8 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CONCORD 1 . Effective Date and Parties: Effective November 29, 1977, John C. Wilson Architect, (herein called "Contractor"), and the County of Contra Costa (herein called "County"), a political subdivision of the State o5 California, mutually agree as follows: II. u rpose: The parties desire to amend that contract they entered into effective February 15, 1977, entitled "Agreement for Architectural Services". This . Agreement was for architectural services for the remodeling of classrooms at the Fire Co4leae on Treat Boulevard and the remodeling of Station No. 8, Concord. III . Amendments: The Agreement for Architectural services is hereby amended as follows: A. Article 11 , A, page 2: Delete Item 2 in its entirety and replace with the following: 112. Provide office and classroom addition and renovation of existing classrooms at the Fire College, 2945 Treat Boulevard, Concord." B. Article II , C. pave 2: Delete in its entirety and replace with the following: "c. The tentative construction cost is hereby declared to be Two Hundred Twenty Thousand and No/IOOths Dollars ($220,000) ." C. Article V, A, Page 10: Delete first paragraph in its entirety and replace with the following: "A. The County agrees to pay the Architect for full performance of architectural services for the construction documents and construction phases herein, a total f=e of $22,000." IV. - Effect: Except for the amendments agreed to herein, the Agreement of February 15, 1977 remains in full force and efsect. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY .PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR LENT By--L By IkI Vernon L. Cline J hn C. Wilson Public Works Director DBA John C. Wilson & Associates RECO'•iMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By TM Nr ' n Arthur G. Will County Administrator By • R., Ih"t. Rygh Deputy Public Works Director FOPJA, APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL Microfilmed with board order l � • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of Approving Amendments to Inspection Services Contracts. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in its capacity as governing board of the County of Contra Costa and all fire districts of which it is the ex-officio governing board APPROVES Amendments to existing Inspection Services Contracts for the following individuals: J. M. Nelson Robert G. Grady Laurel Roderick Cameron Robert G. Soto The aforesaid Amendments provide for increases in hourly wage rates to compensate inspectors for increased insurance costs which includes Contra Costa County, its officers and employees as additional insured. With respect to Mr. Robert G. Grady, the Amendment also appoints him to Senior Inspector. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute the aforementioned Amendments, which are effective December 1 , 1977. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November 1977 cc: Public Works Department Architectural Division Agenda Clerk J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By ��'0--� , Deputy Clerk J. Dye N.PODS County Administrator's Office P. Burton (Info) Inspectors 00232 H-24 3/76 15m FIRST AMENDMENT TO INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITH J. M. NELSON FOR THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: Detention Facility, Martinez 8-1-6-77 Work Order 5269-926 I . Effective Date and Parties: Effective December 1 , 1977, J. M. Nelson, Inspector, herein called "Contractor) , and the County of Contra Costa therein called "County") , a political subdivision of the State of Cali- fornia, mutually agree as follows: II. Purpose: The parties desire to amend the contracts they entered into ef- fective on dates shown, entitled "Special Engineering-Administrative Ser- vices, Construction Supervision and Inspection Contract". III. Amendments: The Contracts are hereby amended as follows: A. Article 1 , e, page 1 : Delete hourly wage rate indicated and replace with the following: e. $14.94 per hour B. Page 3, Add Article 12: 12. Senior Inspector. . The senior inspector shall perform additional supervisory duties, and/or special project duties, and do related work as required, for the Public Agency and shall be compensated at a higher rate for these services. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSPECTOR: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT lowV By, on L. C An Public Works Director RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ti By Arthur G. Will County Administrator By r--- R. M. Rygh Deputy Public Works Director Microfilmed with board order 60233 FORM APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL. I of 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITHWERT G. GRADY FOR THE FOLLOWIPJhONTRACTS: . Stone Valley School Neighborhood Park, Alamo 4-19-76 Work Order 5464-927 John Marsh Home Restoration, Brentwood 8-31-76 Budget No. 4429-4174 Pinole Library Roofing Systems, Pinole 11- 9-76 Budget No. 7710-2310 Kitchen Remodel , Juvenile Hall 2- 8-77 Budget No. 0115-4139 George Mi'lier Jr. Memorial West Therapeutic Pool 2- 8-77 Budget No. 4419-4709 Veterans Memorial Building, Danville, 3- 8-77 Work Order 5480-927 Apparatus Repair Shop at Fire College, Concord 2- 8-77 Budget No. 7100-4697 Montarabay Recreation Center, BayView Park 8-10-76 Work Order 5220-927 Women's Minimum Security, Work/Education Furlough Center, Richmond 8-31-76 Budget No. 4411-4053 Remodeling Classrooms at Fire College and . Remodel of Station No. 8, Concord 3- 8-77 Budget No. 7100-4698 Personal Security System at Juvenile Hall 6-21-77 Budget No. 0115-4138 Kitchen/Dining Hall Facility at the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center, Clayton 8-23-77 Budget No. 4411-4061 Civic Center Improvements, Martinez Area 8-23-77 Budget No. 4405-j; �6 7 Moraga Fire Protection District Administration Building 8-23-77 Budget No.*7050-401,19 North Wing Remodel-Planning Department 3-15-77 Budget No. 0115-4111 --3431 MacDonald Ave. , Richmond = '' 9- 6-77 Budget No. 4050-2310-Ai0- Metal Apparatus Building at Bethel WB99::3 Island Fire Protection District 8- 2-77 Budget No. 7003-4095 Flood Control Building Addition 8-23-77 Budget No. 4050-4062 816 Main Street, Martinez 9- 6-77 Budget No. 4423-4827 2366 Stanwell Drive, Concord -9- 6-77 Budget No. 4050-2310-A10- Landscaping at Women's Minimum"rSecurity f , W89995 Work/Education Furlough Center, Richmond 10-25-77 Budget No. 4411-4722 Kinder-Gym Remodel , Orinda Community Center 11- 1-77 Work Order 5276-927 Orinda Community Center Park, Phase IV 11-14-77 Work Order 5347-927 HVAC Systems at Stations 1 , 5, 6 and 14 3- 8-77 Budget No. 7100-4696 Community Park No. 1, Alamo Area 4-19-77 Work Order 5486-927 367 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill 9- 6-77 Budget No. 4405-4825 West County Fire Protection District Re-roof 11- 8-77 Budget No. 7260-4683 Mechanical and Safety Alterations, Civic Center 11- 8-77 Budget No. 4405-4267-Cl-EDP I. Effective Date and Parties: Effective December 1 , 1977, Robert G. Grady, Inspector, herein called "Contractor") , and the County of Contra Costa herein called "County") , a political subdivision of the State of California, mutually agree as follows: II. Purpose: The parties desire to amend the contracts they entered into effective on dates shown, entitled "Special Engineering-Administrative Services, Construction Supervision and Inspection Contract". III. Amendments: The Contracts are hereby amended as follows: A. Article 1 , e, page 1: Delete hourly wage rate indicated and replace with the following: e. $14.94 per hour B. Page 3. Add Article 12: 12. Senior Inspector. The senior inspector shall perform additional super- visory duties, and/or special project duties, and do related work as re- quired, for the Public Agency and shall be compensated at a higher rate for these services. Page I of 2 Microfilmed with board order 002t.I`C IV. Appointment: Robert G. Grady is appointed to Senior Inspector. V. Effect: Except *the amendments agreed to here the Inspection Ser ices Contracts listed heretofore, remain in full force and effect. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSPECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT BYBy jj on VernL. Cl ' Robert G. Grady Public Works Director RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: -By � Z Arthur G. Will County Administrator By R. M. Rygh Deputy Public Works Director FORM APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL Page 2 of 2 00235 FIRST AMENDMENT TO INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITH LAUREL RODERICK CAMERON FOR THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: -Stone Valley School Neighborhood Park, Alamo 5/2/77 Work Order 5464-927 George Miller Jr. Memorial West Therapeutic Pool 5/2/77 Budget No. 4419-4709 North Wing Remodel - Planning Department 5/2/77 Budget -No. 0115-4111 Women's Minimum Security, Work/Education Furlough Center _. 5/2/77 Budget No. 4411-4053 . Apparatus Repair Shop at Fire College, Concord 5/2/77 Budget No. 7100-4697 HVAC Systems, Stations 1 , 5, 6 and 14 5/2/77 Budget No. 7100-4696 Veterans Memorial Hall Remodel , Danville 5/2/77 Work Order 5480-927 Community Park No. 1 , Alamo 5/2/77 Work Order 5481-927 Personal Security System at Juvenile Hall 6/21/77 Budget No. 0115-4138 Metal Apparatus Building at Bethel Island Fire Protection District 8/2/77 Budget No. 7003-4095 Moraga Fire Protection District Administration Building 8/23/77 Budget No. 7050-4099 Flood Control Building Addition, Martinez 10/4/77 Budget No. 4050-4062 Kitchen/Dining Hall Facility at the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center, Clayton 8/23/77 Budget No. 4411-4061 Civic Center Improvements . 8/23/77 Budget No. 4405-ttJrWY-.Z47 816 Main Street, Martinez 9/6/77 Budget No. 4423-4827 357 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill 9/6/77 Budget No. 4405-4825 3431 MacDonald Ave. , Richmond 9/6/77 Budget No. 4050-2310-A10- WB9996 2366 Stanwell Drive, Concord 9/6/77 Budget No. 4050-2310-AlO WB9995 Kinder-Gym Remodel , Orinda Community Center 11./1/77 Work Order 5276-927 Landscaping at Women's Minimum Security, Work/Education Furlough Center, Richmond 10/25/77 Budget No. 4411-4722 West County Fire Protection District Re-roof 11/8/77 Budget No. 7260-4683 Mechanical and Safety Alterations, Civic Center Improvements 11/8/77 . Budget No. 4405-4267-Ci-EDI Orinda Community Center Park - Phase IV. 11/14/77 _ Mork Order 5347-927 I. Effective Date and Parties: Effective December 1 , 1977, Laurel Roderick Cameron, Inspector herein called "Contractor") , and the County of Confra Costa (herein called "County"), a political subdivision of the State of California, mutually agree as follows: II . Purpose: The parties desire to amend the contracts they entered into effective on dates shown, entitled "Special Engineering-Administrative Services, Construc- tion Supervision and Inspection Contract". III. Amendments: The Contracts are hereby amended as follows: A. Article 1 , e, page 1 : Delete hourly wage rate indicated and replace with the following: e. $14.05 per hour B. Page 3. Add Article 12: 12. Senior Inspector. The senior inspector shall perform additional super- visory duties, and/or special project duties, and do related work as re- quired, for the Public Agency and shall be compensated at a higher rate for these services. Page 1 of 2 00236 Microfilmed with board order i IV.. - Effect: Except for the Amendments agreed to herein, the Inspection Services Contracts listed heretofore, remain in full force and effect. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSPECTOR: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT By By ,^�-� Vernon L. Cline Laur 1 Roderick Cameron '�'ubl is Works Director RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By nM C1 n Arthur G. Will County Administrator By - R. M. Rygh Deputy Public Works Director FORM APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL Page 2 of 2 00237 FIRST AIM ENDMENT TO INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT WITH ROBERT G. SOTO FOR THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: George Miller Jr. Memorial West Therapeutic Pool , Richmond 10-II-77 Budget No. 4419-4709 Apparatus Repair Shop, Concord 10-11-77 Budget No. 7100-4697 HVAC Systems, Stations 1 , 5, 6 and 14 10-11-77 Budget No, 7100-351�6' North Wing Remodel - Planning Department 10-11-77 Budget No. 0115-4111 Veterans Memorial Building, Danville 10-11-77 Work Order 5480-927 Community Park No. 1, Alamo 10-11-77 Work Order 5486-927 Landscaping at Women's Minimum Security, Work/Education Furlough Center 10-25-77 Budget No. 4411-4722 Personal Security System at Juvenile Hall 10-25-77 Budget No. 0115-4138 Kinder-Gym Remodel, Orinda Community Center Park, Orinda 11 -1-77 Work Order 5276-927 816 Main Street, Martinez 11-8-77 Budget No. 4423-4827 Tassajara Fire Protection District Metal Apparatus Building 10-25-77 Budget No. 7023-4096 367 Civic Drive, Pleasant Hill 11- 8-77 Budget No. 4405-4825 Mechanical and Safety Alterations, Civic Center Improvements, Martinez 11-8-77 Budget No. 4405-4267-CI-EDA Moraga Fire Protection District Administration Building 10-4-77 Budget No. 7050-4099 Stone Valley School Park (CSA R-7) 10-11-77 Work Order 5464-927 Orinda Community Center - Phase IV 11-14-77 Mork Order 5347-927 'West County Fire Protection District Re-roof II-8-77 Budget No. 7260-4653 I . Effective Date and Parties: Effective December 1 , 1977, Robert G. Soto, Inspector (herein called "Contractor"), and ,the County of Contra Costa (herein called "County" ), a political subdivision of the State of California, mutually agree as follows: If . Purpose: The parties desire to amend the contracts they entered into effective on dates shown, entitled "Special Engineering-Administrative Services, Construction Supervision and Inspection Contract", 111 . Amendments: The Contracts are hereby amended as follo�:s: A. Article 1 , e, cape I : Delete hourly wage rate indicated and replace with the following: e. $14.05 per hour B. Pace Add Article 12: 12. Senior Inspector. The senior inspector shall perform additional supervisory duties, and/or special project duties, and do related worn as required, for the Public Agency and shall be compensated at a !•cipher rate for these services. 9�i}238 Microfilmed with board order ape 1 of 2 PV. Effect: Except for the amendments agreed to herein, the Inspection Services Contracts listed heretofore, remain in full force and effect. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INSPECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT By `I r BY .�.VernonL. CI i ne Robert' G. Soto Public Works Director RECd-t-'ENDED FOR APPROVAL: By Arthurb. Wi'll County Administrator Y R. M. Rygh Deputy Public Works Director FORM APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL 01239 Faze 2 o: 2 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 7_7- lu the Matter of Water Conservation Efforts within the Public Works Department Operations. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the November 28, 1977 memorandum from the Public Works Director outlining water conservation efforts within his department 's operations, is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 29th day of November 19= J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Sy !C-{gat,% - �L� a'�I %/'' Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00240 H-24 4177 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of _ Proposed Separation of Sheriff-Coroner Functions . The Board on November 15 , 1977 having requested the County Administrator to report on the matter of segregation of the offices of sheriff and coroner, which were combined in 1968 ; and creation of a position of Medical Examiner to perform the coroner function; and The Board having received a November 17, 1977 letter from Mr. Harry D. Ramsay, County Sheriff-Coroner, stating that he has been elected to the office of Countv Sheriff-Coroner for a four-year term and that there should be no removal of any coroner's duty during his term unless sufficient cause exists ; and Mr. Ramsay having advised that the State Attorney General is required to act in every instance where the sheriff and the coroner arelone and the same and where 'a conflict could or does in fact exist, and having also advised that the Attorney General may delegate the authority to the District Attorney to conduct an investigation into sheriff-coroner's responsibilities as necessary to resolve any problems; and Mr. Ramsay having noted that coroner inquests by law are public hearings and that every finding of a coroner concerning a death must be 'recorded and made available for public scrutiny; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid letter is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on November 29 , 1977. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 29th day of November 1977 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By .., �� _ Deputy Clerk Mar raig H-24 4/77 15m 1.70241 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 130AIRD ACTIO14 Nov. 29, 1977 NOTE TO C LA I NLA T Clain Against the County, ) The copy oS flus document mab-'eY to you iz uouh Routing Endorsements, and ) ;zottce oS .the action taken on you"L cZaun by the Board Action. (All Section ) Boatd oS Supew so�,s (Pa.,tagnaph TZT, below) , references are to California ) given puUuant 10 Govvuzment Code Sectti.orvs 911 .8, Government Code.) ) 913, ` 913.4. Ptease note vie "cvaani.ng" be,Zow. Claimant: Steve F. Sinyers, 675 East "11" Street, Benicia, CA Attorney: Tiionias S. Byrnes Address: Law Offices of Michael Janes Moriarty, 601 California Street, Suite 1111, San Francisco, CA 94103 Amount: $100,000. 00 (Via Auditor) Date Received: October 27, 1977 By delivery to Clerk on Oct. 27, 1977 By mail, postmarked on I. FRO,%I: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or Application to File Late Claim. DATED:Oct. 28, 1977 J. R. OLSSOV, Clerk, Byanb {�,� eta /q. Deputy ara U. Nieisoon II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of. the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( :`) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2' and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Laaim (S 11.6) . DATED: f•� (- '7-? JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By Lan ,,, � � u jL� Deputy III. UJARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only), ( X) This Claim is rejected in full. ( ) This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Boards Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: Nov. 29, 1977 J. R. OLSSO1Y, Clerk, by 7 Yj e1L) Deputy Sandra 14. Ni lson WARNING TO CLAINR.N7 (Government Code Sections 911.8 & 913) You have or' y 6 montA6 okom .the ►rcu.&&tg o6 .t ii.6 no.tcee to you w4ZLZn wh ick to S�:�e a cowl action on this %ejected Ct--,bn (.see Govt. Code Sec. 943.6) on 6 r::;.edz s St.om the der iat oS youh. Appp i.ea.t i.on .to F.Ue a Late CZa.im chi t'un which to ncti tto n a coc t Soh re.UeS Brom Section 945.4'6 c& m-bit i.ng deadZ,ine (zee Section 946.6) . You may .Beek the advice oS any atLatney cS youA choice .in connection tvi.dt t'hii!s ma;tL Leh. l,j you want to eon3uZ.t an atto,,Lne� you 6hateed do 6o .cmmediateZy. IV. FROj1: Clerk of the Board TO: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator, & (3) Public Works, Business & Services Division. Attached are cop4.es of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this dcciment, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: I)cc. 2. 1477 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By { � .�� Deputy rT_ 'eli -IcAyi V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County kiniscrator, TO: Clerk of the Board (3) Public Works of Supervisors Received copies of this Clair or Application and Board Order. DATED: vsC, 2, 1977 County Counsel, By County Administrator, By Public Works, By 8. 1 , CLAL'I AGAINST THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 910 et seq. , Steve F. Smyers, through his attorneys, presents the following claim: CLAIMANT'S NAME STEVE F. SMYERS C/o CLAIMANT' S ADDRESS 675 East "H" Street TELEPHONE (415), 433-3159 Benicia, Ca. AMOUNT OF CLAIM $ 100, 000.00 ADDRESS TO jJHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT [CLUERIK EF r c/o. Law Offices of Michael James Moriarty 601 California Street, Suite 1111kC 2 '? 9 j; San Francisco, CA. 94108 J. R. OLSSOV BOARD O= SUR.P,V;:O.nDATE OF INCIDENT July 23, 1977 aryl :c�sr co. LOCATION OF INCIDENT Grizzly Peak Blvd. , east of Centennial Road HOW DID IT OCCUR Claimant and his automobile went over a cliff after he turned into a "turnout area" to avoid hitting an oncoming automobile which was on the wrong side of the road. There were no warning signs, guard rails , or other protective measures which would have informed claimant that there was a cliff, for had he known of the cliff, he would have elected to remain on the road and possibly hit the other automobile or take some other action instead of driving into the turnout area in the manner which he did. DESCRIBE DAMAGE OR INJURY Fractured skull, loss of hearing, neurological damage, neck, back, shoulder injuries NAME OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE(S) CAUSING INJURY OR DAMAGE, IF KNOWN Such public employees are unknown at this date. ITEMIZATION OF CLAIM (List items totaling amount set forth above) Medical to date $ 7. 500 .00 Future Medical $ . 17, 500 .00 Loss of Earnings $ 20-,000 .00 General $ 55,000 .00 TOTAL $ 100,000 .00 Signed on behalf of Claimant Thomas S. Byrnes Microriimed with board order Attorney for Claimant 00243 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Approving Consulting Services Agreement for Landscape Design at the Women's Minimum Security, Work/Education Furlough Center, Richmond. (4411-4722) The Board of Supervisors APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Richard Splenda and Assoc. , of Richmond for landscape design at the Women's Minimum Security, Work/ Education Furlough Center. This Agreement is effective November 29, 1977 and provides for a maximum payment of $4,000, which amount shall not be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Bldgs and Grnds Supervisors cc: Public Works Department affixed this 29th day of November 19 77 Agenda Clerk Architectural Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By �f. /'p-� , Deputy Clerk J. Dye N.PODS County Administrator P. Burton Consultant (via P/w) 012444 H-24 4/77 15m CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT hese Qpeclrl- ^C --' r —orated 'elJ/: } r -efer a ?S:eCtal Cod-:t o J ^L .a: _ s ano...a . v� (a) ?utl;c A;,en:,%: Contra Costa County (b) Ccnsmultmait's : amz � Ad^:ess: Richard Splenda & Assoc.. Landscape Architects, West Richmond Avenue Pt Richmond, California 94801 - (c) EfrectizeLate: November 29, 1977 (d) Project 'aro., Number IAcat Cn: an scaping at Women s WOrk FUrlough Cente V , R'Chwoud-.Budget line- Item Nn- 4411-4722) (e) P • &nt $4,000.00 2. Si=aCM_esW( s.rj?la-�e si :a` ^As n'--est t' oa=ies' ag'eement hereto: CViiJvLi:L.l All By Deo;ji l cccaciiu in �7Lc3Zr:ess) State of *California, ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACi;.`:D7K..::' :•"s (CC X1190.1) The nn n l^moi rt:* a t;e Consultant, "m_'1.''.:tii1 to me in those it di'v id'uai 3d':d •..s:Lness �_^s�n s.._,_., bo for ..... capaclitles, personally appear.ad .-i�vre me today and ac f2cb•rle; ed that he it 2-vi 'M-1 1..::$ co---o.a':ion or partruership rt=ed above executed the e t:roLn inst`:rz..•e.^_: purs=ni to its by-Im-is or a resolution of its OFFIcIAL SEAL LS= rElizabeth 14. Cadwallader ��• Z_':1�:1 vi=a� NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA PUeiiC 7T0_^its � :e^,t^+r `� •', PRINCIPAL OFF. IY ••` CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MY Commission Expires September 26, 1918 Vernon L. Cline . 2 3. Da":'es Ei`'eCt2:e C:1 the above Cate, t:e �Ov e-^•2.^ed �u�',liC Agency 3.n4 (`Gnw.. 'a•^- ..l r z u i l y agree and P.ro-ise as fo'_lo:•:s: Io•ent. P:�!_c :goody hereby an iG S .G::jultant, and consuitan 3CCe��S : 'C to perc the professional services described here_1, UDC: the te=.s n �.r1 -_cr i n:rani n �f the .�';.^-:1+�+. ..ted • C i n• ,.....s ,...__r�„n .., ,... yh.m.,_..:s st,:�...• m:_re_ .. 5• Scope of Service. Scone of service ►^. ll be as rescr n„ d . 1 Appendix. �., a _n,..i-=._i hereto and made a par,. hereo-f. o. Insurance. Cons,.;ltant shall 1, at no cost to Public Agency, obtain and :r-nt.In d' the term., ereo:• (a) :or ersT Co=ensation a=s1jant -o state Ia: , and (o) Co.-.►rene_nsi ve Laabi' ty insurance, Inc?tiding coverage for awrned and non-o:med automnIc ?es, cath a rrtirni aza comb:L ed single limit coverage of $0510,000 for all damages due to bodilj n,j Ur'✓, sic'!cness or disease, or death to any person, and damage to property, inclJ.d n the loss of Use thereof, arising out of each accident. or occurrence. Consultant shall l furnish evidence of such coverage, namilng- Public P,gencY, its officers and emp. loyees as adciti ornT insureds, and requiring jU days' ':mitten notice of policy lapse or cancellation. 7. Pay:-ant_ Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services per£o:^ed at the rates shaven in :noendi t B attached hereto, vehich include all overhead and incice:,ta? expenses, for >•;hich no additional cormensation shall be alloT:red. In no evert shall the total �arr:aart paid to t_ Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. t(e) :•ritnout prior mritten approval of the Contra Costa CoL;.-rty Public :v'orks Director. Consul.tart Is statement of char es shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made u-1thin thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Teri;ration. At its option, Public Pg ency may terminate this agreement at any time by Ir:'::;.ten notice to the Consultant, ethet'rmer or not the Consultant is in default. Cyon such, termli n tion, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertain ng to the .'ori; possessed by idm. or under his control at that time, and gill be paid, —Ithout dupli-:�a.tion, all amounts due or therea_l"ter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Sta—tus. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an e•=loyee of Public Agency. 10. Inde:"_+;fication. Tre Consultant shall defend, save, and hold har:raess Public PZercy and its officers and e.•rployees froni any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachments Append-1K A ' Appendix 3 Mi Appendix C crofilmed with board order. Form approved by County Counsel 6/77 Richard Sptenda & Associates l Landscape architects 226 West RichiceW Arm - Pt RiChMOd •Q •94801 •(415) 237.4465 October 17, 1977 Ref: CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT LANDSCAPING WO'VIEN'S WORK FURLOUGH, RICHMOND, CA. 4411-4722 APPENDIX A SCOPE OF SERVICE: MASTER PLAN Master Plan rendering (brown line) Master Plan reproducible (sepia) CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Working Drawings (plans, details, etc. ) Specifications (technical portion only) APPENDIX B HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE: PRINCIPAL $30, 00/hour TECHNICAL 20. 00/hour CLERICAL 12. 00/hour Microfilmed with board order 00246 STATE COMPENSATION P.O.BOX 807,SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 94101 1!V SU RA NCE FUND CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE November 2, 1977 County of Contra Costa Public Works Dept. 64 Administration Blvd. Martinez, Ca. 94553 Attn: Mr. Bob Baba This is to certify that we have issued a valid Workers'Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the California Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated. (30) This policy is not subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon:t [ days'advance written notice to the employer. (30) We will also give you-55&days'advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration 443826-77 (4-4-77/4-4-78) EMPLOYER RESIDENT Richard Splenda & Associates 226 West Richmond Ave. Richmond, Ca. 94801 sh SCIF FORM 262A(REV.2-76).�. s Microfilmed with board order _ t..�a'YC��:i-.f - ria � ' i a i t .` y Y >3+)rs�t♦+IE{�i�>t,w �tit% . !.< •! ':. '���jp� -,•) � 'ls•nsasa� .r-+• ..Mali., �.. � •...+ ! -v> 7 t '• :'.E� ., •] .!�.->N J J J�r: +y �"=7t��r } +. 'a��y�) s :. NAWF app & COMPANIES'AF,FORDlr4G.COVERAGES MN •. _i76 Ygnacio Valley Road _ _ t Walnut Creek, CA 94598 IV r r E R . INSURANCE OOLIQANY OF NOM ArI 2ICF, c,vr nNt FIRE+M" T.'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY LEfrFR 7,.,.��,,� �,,,a,, CO'APA;h' Richard'Splendor I LLJGt. j ErT rEFt V -RI CI RD SPIaIDA .& ASSOCIATES rourr,NY 226•West Richtrond Avenue lxrTrlr Point .Ri_chtmrtd, CA-94801 Cu+ti`aNY ,y 'LETTER :-. .. wl Thisis tri *i.;rlv u:.1;potJ: ^c,,;Insilrolice list id bele:v h.,ve t.-cen issued to the itisured narrI I :rt�ove and are in€orce at this lime k Limits of Lkllilit in Thousand! 00 rUUCY Y ant A GENERAL LIABUTY GLP672312^ _ u-8-7 8� EfnflltYlNlJRv 3' 3 l���f1r!t.. •r'• 06 1111`0 a.•N' MJJPERrY DAM.06i i j(''�T�'t•1 t} `4.?NJ!'122 rr":� �-: .i; L�1.11trCt`Cr1)I i.iNl1...•'.yJ;. RD - �r`1 ipJ_ISr,:)'Arl.f:[U .. - �.. '.. .t,-• EX at. BODILY INJUrIYAND 7P1401`ERTY DAMAGE, i s l_t Pro-"* $ te-W PPnrr•EPTY CObtlilNEq 50Q r 500 a. r1lN!!EPJt•0Lr;T Cr.:FJ•'.'••; r*r?k All 1:..1111 r ~ PCRSONfl.,INJURY S 50Q 4.I2TOMOBILE Llr t••; t l Y 44 901 15-38 11=8=78' :wmLV IN IuRY F 1t i efl.11 Pf ft50ti. Z E E c,t2tly K3IUf t S v..val- IErr.lrrx.Currittr. r. ,a t N;rr{t t4nomilY pw"Ul f 3 (' )Y,1'A YRJ.17rAYIr:q 5 X tit ir7'J:':F r. COP.113INED �- 't•ln)P►rrtti uAetnc;r s 50Q ,�; .+ EXCESS LlAdDTY. - t 44riml Y InimY l.Ni/ x ,_ :•+Rau FnP ♦ ( PiY>rr.RfY DAMAGE c•rl rkT,eraltr.grcl!:. i Cprt.!IrKEp - 7 and $ n, Er+FLOYE ice'LrA6!LITY OTHER b, jOESCkTIt. J r/J •r. ..•.� r• ry J(r Vit:•.,..r1t a _... Ceitificatle holder its officers and employees are named as additional ancureds as respectsi ` services perfbri to by insured on project #4411 4722 - "Women's'lhbr-k Furlough') l Cancellation: �Iuwulct .ulv (11 th, ,J! _, liesr--1'ed polir•it be r'atic.01t.d belore tlJ+rE 1•IJiratien date thereof- the issuing com- .puny will tr.!•.iror to to the Below iiarned r:ertikate h'0 Ider. but failure to mail such notice shall witivse no obligation or liability of any kind upon the company. Nw• •,•..Y...:•ri-- r 1121:-s rt,t .l,ti;^ - - : .:" PUBLIC WIM DEPARIMM! Dart rzurll _Uw 7? C)OUWY OF CONTRA OOSTA : 64:-Admin titration;Btdl dingL ,. . It2 Martinez, CA:94553 �gi11 EU uJ Esen:arn� --- 1Nicrofl med with board orde�;0024C7 + �1 `tC7 s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of Approving Consulting Services Agreement for the County Health Clinic, Oakley. (4419-4729) The Board of Supervisors APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute A Consulting Services Agreement with Frank P. Bellecci , Surveyor, for a topographic survey at the proposed County Health Clinic site in Oakley. This Agreement is effective November 29, 1977 and provides for payment to the Consultant in the amount of $2,000, which amount shall not be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supervisors cc: Public Works Department affixed this 29thday of November 19 77 Agenda Clerk Architectural Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller J. Dye By Deputy Clerk County Administrator N.POUS P. Burton A Consultant JiliY,��j 1)0249 H-24 3/76 15m 1. Soecial Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. ,.'(a) Public -Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Frank P. Bellecci , Surveyor, 2056 East St. , Concord California gdS20 - (c) Effective Date: 15 November 1977 (d) Project Name, Number & Location: COUNTY HEALTH CLINIC AT OAKLEY - (Budget Line Item (e) Paymnent Limit..; $2,000 Y4419-4129) 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreemeent hereto: CONSLZTA;NT By !Designate official capacity in business! State of California ) ss Contra Costa County ) AC1410. Fr^ 'IVT (CC §1190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowrledged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. PUBLIC AGENCY [SEAL] OFFICIAL ICIAL SEAL By: �iernon L. Cline %'I'dCFNT H. CUNHA "tea ;:f PNOTA^Y PUCLIC-CALIFORNIA Public Works Director :;_,:J C0'1!-,r2, COSTA COUNTY 13, 1330 9B � , Date: .3/ y= Notary Public 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Eriloyment. Public Agency hereby employs Consultant, and Consultant accepts such em�aloyment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the tears and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. Consultant shall, at no cost to Public Agency, obtain and maintain during the tern hereof: (a) Z•lorkers' Compensation Insurance pursuant to state law, and (b) Comprehensive Liability Insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owrned automobiles, with a =. umum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person, and damage to property, including the loss of use thereof, arising out of each accident or.occurrence. Consultant shall furnish evidence of such coverage, naming Public Agency, its officers and employees as additional insu�^eds, and requiring30days' written notice of policy lapse or cancellation. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional ca-mensation shall be alloyed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Ter7Liriation. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertaining to the work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachments Appendix A- Scope of Service Appendix B- Fee Schedule Appendix C - Insurance ��d��5�` Form approved by County Counsel 677 Microfilmed with board order .r FRANK P. BELLECCI LK;P.5'F'? LAND SURVC� int J14- 2056 EAST STREET 4030 SAINT MARY'S STREET CONCORD,CA. 94520 c -_=� MARTINEZ,CA. 94553 -^82i (Office) = 228-2133(Residence) 689--0484 October 24, 1977 Contra Costa County Building Maintenance Department 823 Pain Street Martinez, CA 9 .553 Attention: Bob Bo a P, Gentlemen: In regards to the County' s planned project in Oakley. To perform the work required: . 1. Boundary survey the entire Block of Block 2 of the "Town of Oakley" bounded BB Ruby Street, Second Street, Acme Street, and O'Hara Avenue. 2. rile a Parcel Map or a Record of Survey on the parcel which ever may be required. 3. Set all necessary property corners with l)-" iron pipes. 4. Topographic survey on the entire Block. 5. Frepare Topographic Map as required by your office. All the above work mentioned not to exceed a sum of $2,000.00. Enclosed is my rats schedule for your use. If further information is required, please call. Very truly yours, r Bellecci Enclosure - I,icensed Land Surveyor FPB:sc Appendix A to Consulting Services Agreement dated November 15, 1977 be�ween Contra Costa County Public Works Department and Frank P. Bellecci, Surveyor. 0 page) Microfilmed with board order WPM t loft 1 SCHEDULE OF FEES OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL AVERAGE HOURLY RATES Licensed Land Surveyor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35/hour Senior Draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25/hour Computer-Draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27.50/hour Draftsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20/hour Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15/hour FIELD 2-man field party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $57.75/hour 3-man field party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $82.50/hour Stakes, monuments, materials included in price. Blueprints at cost plus 25% FRANK P. BELLECCI Licensed Land Surveyor 2056 East Street Concord, California 94520 Phone: 689-0484 8/1/77 Appendix B to Consulting Services Agreement dated November 15, 1977 between Contra Costa _County Public Wo ks Department and Frank P. Bellecci , Surveyor. (1 Page) 00252 1 of 1 Microfilmed with board order AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 5636 EFF: 12-2-77 This is to certify that STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Bloomington, Illinois STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Bloomington, Illinois has in force for BELLECCI, FRANK P DBA : FRANK P BELLECCI SURVEYING Name of Policyholder 2056 EAST STREET Address of Policyholder CONCORD, CA 94520 0 Rupunn location of operations - SAME Nov 15 tnn W-Rime WORKS IN the following coverages for the periods and limits indicated below. kcmmftw POLICY NUMBER TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY PERIOD LIMITS OF LIABILITY (eff./exp.) Comprehensive General Liability ❑ Dual Limits for: BODILY INJURY Manufacturers'and Each Occurrence S Contractors'Liability Aggregate S ❑Owners',Landlords'and PROPERTY DAMAGE Tenants'Liability The above insurance includes Each Occurrence S (applicable if indicated by®) ]PRODUCTS - COMPLETED OPERATIONS Aggregate` S OWNERS'OR CONTRACTORS'PROTECTIVE LIABILITY ®Combined Single Limit for: BODILY INJURY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE _ CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY Each Occurrence S_5aQ[1QQ POLICY NUMBER I TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY PERIOD Aggregate S 500000 (eff./exp.) CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY LIMITS EiWatercraft (If different than above) Liability BODILY INJURY 1,2-2-77 Each Occurrence S 97-81, 1947 � OFFICE PROPERTY DAMAGE 12-2-70 Each Occurrence S ❑ Aggregate S Workmen's Compensation Coverage A STATUTORY ❑ Coverage A Employer's Liability Coverage B S -Coverage B 'Aggregate not applicable if Owners'.Landlords'and Tenants'Liability I nsurance excludes structural alterations,new construction or demolition. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE NEITHER AFFIRMATIVELY NOR NEGATIVELY AMENDS, EXTENDS OR ALTERS THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY ANY POLICY DESCRIBED HEREIN, Appendix C to Consulting Services Agreement dated November 15, 1977 between Contra Costa County, Public Works Department and Frank P. Bellecci , Surveyor. (4 pages) NAME AND ADDRESS OF PARTY TO WHOM CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED F COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA MAINTENANCE DIVISION °at`!=— 725 COURT -�/-c� L_ MARTINEZ, CA Signature of uthorized Representative -� Title F6994.4 Page 1 of 4 Microfilmed with board order .« Y1r was BELLE-CL19 FKANK r E JOANNE E ` cow MEW 4030 ST MARYS ST MARTINEZ CA 94553 +rt frrr a r w ea,a.war DOW20 TO VROH WWA UT Aw MAAAW 2 CAA O.T Ars Ar CAM Aa 3 �1•r CTN GROW UM rw �.(a OV1q� T MAW OF MMM OPaIEATOa OPERATOR'S LICENSE NOISTATt ��*�E u`aw�TR 1►Ra. OCCUPAnOA 1, a� Y a HAD LICEN SE SUSPENDED, REVOKED OR REFUSEW.— r rC.TRAFFIC VOLATIONS ICONVIgnONS OR MAIL FORFErn~ OR: 0.HAD ACCIDENT OR LOSS?.._.......................................... d.ANY PHYSICAL LIIAITA ONS N MENTAL DEFECTS?...._._...,. I d" MICMU PAID � i 8042 049—BO3-05A ri A M c optP oMrt.a POCKY FmOO 500 500 500 2 5 M 15 130 ,, JUN-29-77 TO FEB-03-78 t - t4l Chum OESCEMSO%MOMt/lMM-TW-MY tftLbi0111fM S CovvmEt ' DATSUN 77 PICKUP KHL620173624 s 17 s 1' G ' COVERAGLu E3S`____--_ — •Q wEEaaRewr► rR�k,uM s f COVERAGES_----- C3 IMSUR,Ot C CK AGENra CHECK COVERAGES- EXCEPTIONS AND ENDORSEMENTS a, • s 62566, 6028. 3 ADDL INS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTYBUILDING ' y N"alvaDATE MAINTENANCE DEPT, ATTN: BOB BABA, MARTINEZ LSA 94553. 254.00 9 Appen J DATE 0,Ar. TME 3 ANTS CODE STAY► ' PERSONS tHSU>ZED COVERAGE I 491m C" TER. aA:a u Aa A• GE • z 09 1L301 0 7 1 z Lu 05 3 5636 N 62 Page 2 of 4 Microfilmed with board order 0025.1 I 6028.3 ADDITIONAL INSURED i (Prior Notice of Termination) Nothing herein contained shall be held to alter,vary.waive or extend any of the terms. conditions. agreements ' or limitations of the undermentioned policy other than as stated herein below. 1. I Effective 11/ 14177, 12:01 A.M. Standard Time. Attached to and forming a part of policy number 8QI12 049 303 o5A Issued to'3''f "MOT. °Tan 0— end Jrian_n_!? E. by the STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, of Bloomington. Illinois, or the STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, of Bloomington. Illinois. as indicated by the company name on the policy of which this endorsement is a part. J (The information above is required only when Countersigned 1 19LL this endorsement is issued subsequent to the prep ration of the policy.) _ �_, Alen, ' "`„”' r ied %presentative PH.o:F. 223.0520 f i It is hereby agreed that such insurance as is afforded (2) The additional insured named herein shalt not by the policy under coverages A and B for Bodily be held liable for any premium or expanse.of Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability is ! any nature on this policy or any extension extended to cover SEE BELOS thereof, and' ' (3) The additional insured named herein shalt not, subject to the provisions thereof granting coverage to by reason of being so named, be considered M an insured other than the named insured. a member of the tual Automobile Insurance State Company for any I It is further agreed that: purpose whatsoever. (1) The naming of an additional insured as herein The provisions of the policyto which this endorsement I provided shall not affect any recovery to which is attched will not be chaged, suspended,canceled, such additional insured would be entitled or otherwise terminated as to the interest of the under this policy if not named as such additional insured named herein without first giving I additional insured. and such additional insured-SO days' written notice. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BUILDING MAINTENANCE DEPT ATTN: BOB BABA MARTINEZ CA .945$3- President Page 3 of 4 Microfilmed with board order :.d STATE t COMPENSATION P.O.BOX 807,SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFCRNIA 94101_ � ' N S U R A NCE FUND -. CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS'COMPENSATION INSURANCE .' : September 16, 1977 �,• Contra Costa County F P.O. Box 791 , •; Martinez, CA 94553 ATTN: Babba This is to certify that we have issued'a valid Workers Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by ttie Ca(Iforrila Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated. `• I eThis otic Is not subject to cancellation b ;h Fund except upon ten days'advance written notice to the employer. �+ 3 We will also give.you days'advance notice shoilid this policy be cancelled prior to its normal expiration- 395983-77 (3-17-77/3-17-78) + EMPLOYER ;rte IDENT Y� Vrank Bellecci 205&"-est Street: Concord, CA 94520 Bt1 -. . % } SCI FORM 262A(REV.2-76)�.• DUPLICATE 3 i . t 5 00 Page 4 of 4 Microfilmed with board. order OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL AVERAGE HOURLY RATES Licensed Land Surveyor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $35/hour Senior Draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $25/hour Computer-Draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $27.50/hour Draftsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20/hour Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15/hour FIELD 2-man field party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $57.75/hour 3-man field party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $82.50/hour Stakes, monuments, materials included in price. Blueprints at cost plus 25% FRANK P. BELLECCI Licensed Land Surveyor 2056 East Street Concord, California 94520 Phone: 689-0484 8/1/77 gpoendix B to Consulting Services Agreement dated November 15, 1977 between Contra Costa County Public We ks Department and Frank P. Bellecci, Surveyor. (1 page) 1 of 1 00251 Microfilmed with board order t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 1977 . 19 In the Matter of Space for Law and Justice System Development Project IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Lease Management Division, Public Works Department, is AUTHORIZED to negotiate for additional space for the Law and Justice System Development. Project in Concord. Passed by the Board on NOV 2 9 1977 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Or ig: A dIm i n i stra t or Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: PL'biic Wor;'S Supervisors NOV 2 Lease Management � lgll affixed this day of 19 Lav and Justice System Develop^ent Project 1070 Concord Avenue J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Suite 190, Concord ' B�� lGsr �iL� Deputy Clerk Nr sine M.Netvtetd Deputy Cierk H-24 4/77 15m ��) 5` In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 Z'L In the Matter of Appointment to Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council. On the recommendation of Supervisor R. I. Schroder, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that NIr. H. Warner Griggs, Jr., 1733 Springbrook Road, Walnut Creek, California 94596 is APPOINTED as a representative of the Third Supervisorial District on the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr. Alexander Babin. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc' Pair. H. V1. Griggs, Jr. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Contra Costa County Supervisors Community Development affixed this 29 t play of_November 19 'jam Advisory Council Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor—Controller County Administrator By % Deputy Clerk Public Information Officer Ro bie Gutierrez H-24 3/7C, 15um IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUN'T'Y, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the clatter of Award of Contract ) for Detention Facility Precast ) Concrete, Martinez, California. ) November 29, 1977 Project iib. 5269-926-(50) ) Bidder TOTAL A )UM Bond Amounts Basalt Rock Company $646,450 Tabor & Mats. $ 323,225 Napa, California Faith, perf. $ 646,450 Tecon Pacific $674,000 West Sacramento, California The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public Works Director reeding that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED, that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed budder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance or other required documents, and the Public Works Director has reviewed and found thein to be sufficient, the Public Works Director is autInri.zed to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FUR= ORDERED that, in accordance with the project specifications and/or upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, any bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be exonerated and any checks or cash submitted for bid security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Suoervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness ray hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November 19 77, iriginator: Public Works Department J. R. OLSSON, Cler:, Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller -fin �� p ��� �/, Contractor By / , Deputy Cler 2 V N. Pous Foan 9.1 (Rev. 9-77) c c ; �Ct EIS • CONTRACT (Construction Agreement) J. R. O' SON (Contra Costa County Standard Form) CLERK BOARD O, SUPERVISORS CO RA COSTA CO. ey ..Deputy . ._. ...._.................... SPa'CIAL iS31S. These special terms are ir-corporated below by - ce. (552.3) Pardee: [Public Agency] Contra Costa County (Contractor] Basalt Rock Company (Complete legal race (52) ffectiae data: December 12, 1977 [See 54 for starting date.] (53) Tile Work: Detention Facility Precast Concrete, Proj. No. 5269-926-(50), which includes fabrication and erection of precast concrete units, including anchorage devices, supports, inserts and fastenings, all in accordance with Plans and Specifications prepared for the Public Works Director and in accordance with the apcepted .bid p�'oposaI . (S-�) Carp et:on _:zt: s e out (a) or (b) and "calendar" or "workingol (a) XWXJdXX*XX ----------- (b) Within 237 calendar]'`.@*("}(days from starting date. (SS) Liquidated Dmacges: $ None per calendar day. (Actual) (S6) 'ubZic Agency's agent: Public Works Director (57) Contract Price:/ s 646 450.00 —X0hUX*XXXNWWUXUftWXUXX xAXXYAi cxx,4 Xl� x�c(*Xx _x1mN� x �cx c x x [Strike out parenthetical ma a - s^.app is a. 2. 5iGi1,1,''J s S 3 dC3JC:IL�DG,%29zkbzk PuvZic Acencv, By: Vernon L. Cline Designated Representative) �.. Public Works Director AMMUXUX Contractor, hereby also acknowledging awareness of and compliance with Labor Code,!jr}36l cancerning workers' Compensation law,: '. i IACD 3TT21=QL0\4, PRESID,sNT. By: ( .✓� j (COFtPORATE- ' igna o:z. ai capacity/n t�nz usiness t sEALl ; GEO?GE A. STEIN VICE-PRESIDENT-ADMINISTRATION iD agnate fic_a cape ty zn the busin ess tF ,' �• ' `'+ SECRETARY Jote to Contractor (I) Exacuta acinowLadgmer-7 for.- baZaw, and (21 .f c corpora- tion, affix Corporata Sea.'. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of California ) ACXJ0W-rZDG1.1E.TT (by Corporation, Comity of Nana ) Ws' Partr.2rsup, or Individual) The person(s) signing above for Contractor, known to me in individual are- business capacity as stated, personally appea.:ed before r..e today and acknowledged ;hat hs/they executed it and that the corporation or partnership na.:.ed above executed it. Dated: December 15. 1977 ru!•» a�,vrs ,�'iuunusnuunlunusslluus' ,t ��„a1,; :: �•^ a_] LENA B]RCH Notarl Pup17.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - �- i�'`�F t>`J t��'• 7 Cou.^.fie?- C My Commission Expires August 31, i.i, (?age 1 az 4) (CC-i: Rev. Microfilmed with board order 161 3. WORK CONTRACT. CFUU;GES. (a) By their signatures in -Section 2, effective on the ?iMove nate, these parties promise and agree as set forth in this contract, incorporating by these references the material ('special terms") in Sec. 1. (b) Contractor shall, at his own cost and expense, and in a workmanlike manner, fully and faithfully perform and complete the work; and will furnish all materials, labor, services and transportation necessary, convenient and proper in order fairly to perform the requirements of this contract, all strictly in accordance with the Public agency's plans, drawings aad specifications: tc) The work can be changed only with Public agency's prior written order specifying such change and its cost agreed to by the parties; and the Public Agency shall never have to pay more than specified in Sec. 7 without such an order. 4. TINE: :1OTICE TO PROCEED. Contractor Whall start this work as directed in the speci- fications or the :notice to Proceed; and shall complete it as specified in Sec. 1. 5. LIQUIDATED DA11AGES. If the Contractor fails to complete this contract and this work within the time fixed therefor, allowance being made for contingencies as provided herein, he becomes liable to the Public agency for all its loss and damage therefrom; and because, from the nature.of the case, it is and will be impracticable and extremely difficult to ascertain and fix the Public agency's actual damage from any delay in performance hereof, it is agreed that Contractor will pay as liquidated damages to the Public Agency the reasonable sum specified in Sec. 1, the result of the parties' raasonable endeavor to estimate fair average compensation therefor, for each calendar day's delay in finishing said work; and if the same be not paid, Public Agency may, in addition to its other . remedies, deduct the same from any money due. or to become due Contractor under this con- tract. If the Public Agency for any cause authorizes or contributes to a delay, suspen- sion of work or extension of ti=e, its duration shall be added to the time allowed for completion, but it shall not be deemed a waiver nor be used to defeat any right of the Agency to damages for non-completion or delay hereunder. Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 4215, the Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the work, when such delay was .caused by the failure of the Public Agency or the owner of a utility to provide for removal or relocation of existing utility facilities. 5. 2:7^_'EGRaTED DOCLMENTS. The plans, drawings and specifications or special provisions o: rae Public agency s call for bids, and Contractor's accented bid for this work are hereby incorporated into this contract; and they are intenM to co-operate, so that any- tiing e.chibited in the plans or drawings and not mentioned in ire specifications or special provisions, or vice versa, is to be executed as if exhibited, mentioned and set forth in both, to the tvae intent and meaning thereof when taken all together; and differences of opinion concerning these shall be finally determined by Public Agency's Agent specified in Sec. 1. 7. PAY-ME1W .-,',ta) - For his strict and literal fulfillment of these promises and conditions, ebmpepsation for all this work, the Public Agency shall pay the Contractor �i . the sura specified," Sec. 1, except that in unit price contracts the pay-,.fent shall be =or �. finished quantit1" at unit bid prices. (b) iOn .or abqut\the first day of each calendar month the Contractor shall submit to the Public Agencj;a verified application for payment, support by a statement showing ail mzateria`ls ael;uall_v installed during the preceding month, the -labor expended thereon, 'a.d the. cost thezeef; whereupon, after checking, the Public agency shall issue to �ontracto=,a'c9 iacate forthe amount determined to be due, minus 10% thereof pursuant to Goverrre;:t� Code Sec. 530G7, but not until detective work and materials have been resaved, replaced and made good. 3. PAYbM:ITS WITTMELD. (a) The Public Agency or its agent may withhold any payment, or because of later pzscovered evidence nullify all or any certificate for payment, to such extent and period of time only as may be necessary to protect the Public Agency from loss because of: (1) Defective work not remedied, or uncompleted work, or (2) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing, or (3) Failure to properly pay subcontractors or for material or labor, or (4) iteasonable doubt that the work can be completed for the balance then unpaid, or (5) :Ia:.ace to another, contractor, or (6) Damage to the Public Agency, at^.er than damage due to delays. (b) The Public Acency shall use r_asonabl_ diligence to discover and report to the Contractor, as the work progresses, the materials and labor w1^.ich are not satisfactory to it, so as to avoid unnecossa_-y trouble or cost to the Contractor in making goad any defective work or parts. (c) 35 calendar dans after the Pt..'^lig Agency files its notice of ccr..plat-'On of t.':e entire (Page 2 of 4) (j'{ (CC-1; aev. 11 �) i 1V 262" l work, it shall issue a certificate to the Contractor and pay the balance of the contract price after deducting all arounts withheld under this contract, provided the Contractor shows that all claims for labor and materials have been paid, no claims have been presented to the Public agency based on acts or omissions of the Contractor, and no liens or withhold notices have been filed against the work or site, and provided there are not reasonable inaications of defective or missing work or of late-recorded notices of liens or claims against Contractor. 4. I1,SUPr1:1C:;. (Labor Code 551860-61) On signing this contract, Contractor must give Pudic Agency (1) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or (2) a certificate of Workers' Compensation insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (3) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. Contractor is aware of and complies with Labor Cods Sec. 3700 and the Workers' Compensation Law. 10. BOUDS. On signing this contract Contractor shall deliver to Public Agancy for approval good and sufficient bonds with sureties, in amounts) specified in the specifi- cations or special provisions, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this contract and his payment for all labor and materials hereunder. 11. r1ILL'RE TO PERFORM:. If the Contractor at any time refuses or neglects, without fault of the Public agency or its agent(s) , to supply sufficient materials or workmen to complete this agreement and work as provided herein, for a period of 10 days or more after written notice thereof by the Public Agency, the Public agency may furnish same and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof fro= the contract price. 12. UWS APPLY. General. Both parties recog u:e the applicability of various federal, state and ocsI lae:s ana regulations, especially Chapter 1 of Part 7 of the California Labor Code (beginning with Sec. 1720, and including Secs,:. 1735, 1777.5, i 1777.G forbidding discrimination) and intend that this agreeent complies therewith. The parties specifically stipulate that the relevant penalties and forfeitures provided in the Labor Cede, especially in Secs. 1775 & 1313, concerning prevailing wages and hour„ shall apply to this agreement as though fully stipulated herein. 13. SUBCONTRACTORS. Government Code 553100-4113 are incorporated herein. 14: :SAGE RATES. (a) Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1773, the Director of the Department of . Industrial Re ations has ascertained the general prevailing rates of wages per diem, and for holiday and overtime Work, in the locality in which this work is to be performed, for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract, and said rates are as specified in the call for bids for this work 'and are on file with the Public Ac_ncy, and are hereby incorporated herein. (b) This schedule of wages is based on a working day of 8 hours unless otherwise specified; and tete daily, rate is the hourly rate multiplied by the number of hours con- stituting the working day. ?then less tt:an that number of hours are worked, the daily wage rate is proportionately reduced, but the hourly rate remains as stated. (c) The Contractor, and all his subcontractors, :gust pay at least these rates to all persons on this work, including all travel-, subsistence, and fringe benefit paytients provided for by applicable collective bargaining agreements. All skilled labor not listed above must be paid at least the wage scale established by collective bargai.:ing agreement for such labor in the locality %there such war'-- is 'Laing perfo=ed. If it becomes neces- sary for the Contractor or any subcontractor to employ any person in a craft, classifi- cation or type of _% work (eceot executive, supervisory, administrative, clerical or other non-manual workers as such) for which no min-,= wage rata is s_recified, the Contractor shall i=ediately notify the Public agency which shall promptly determine the prevailing wage rate tierefor and furiish the Contractor with the minim-um rate based thereon, which scall apply fro= the time of the initial employment of the person affected and during the continuance of such er:ployment. 15. HOURS OF i.a3OR. Eight hours of labor in one calendar day constitutes a legal day's work, and no wori=zn e=.ployed at any t--we on this wor'.•: by the Contractor or by any sub- contrac-tor shall be raqui_ed or per_4 ttad to war': longer thereon except as provided is Labcr Code Secs. 1310-1315. 15. 'nP?G:'^ICiS. Properly indentured apprenr�ces =ay be employed on - is wcrk in aceortahce.wit. La:cr Code Secs. 1777.5 and 1777.0, forbidding discr,-ihation. (Page 3 of 4) (CC-i; R--v. 11-7a) �oj�s� 17_PREFERENCE FOR :SATERIALS. The Public agency desires to promote the industries and economy or Contra Costa County, and the Contractor therefore promises to use the products, work...en, laborers and mechanics of this County in every case where the price, fit.-loss and quality are equal. 18, ASSIGN=T. This agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives Me or e Contractor; but he cannot assign it in whole or in part, nor any conies due or to become due under it, without the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the Contractor's surety or sureties, unless they have waived notice of assignment. 19. NO WAIVER BY PUBLIC AGE::CY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the Public agency indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the Public Agency be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from the failure to ccaply with any of the teras and conditions hereof. 20. HOLD H-A-WILESS s I::CE:=:ITY. (a) Contractor promises to and shall hold harmless and indemnity from oris liabiliues as defined in this section. (b) The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the Public Agency and its electivesappointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. (c) The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedlysu�dincurred or threatened because of actions defined below, including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the Public Agency approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s) or action(s) at law or equity concerning these. (d) The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection. a .:attars covered by this contract and attributable to the contractor, subcontractor(s) , or any officer(s) , agent(s) or amployee(s) of one or rare of them. (e) :Ion-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on wnetaer or not any Indermitee has prepared, supplied,.or approved any plan(s) , drawing(s) , specification(s) or special provision(s) in connection with this work, has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. 21. 2-MAMATION. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Labor Code Sec. 5705, is app ieaa e, oy submitting to Public Agency a detailed plan showing tae design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during trench excavation. (Page 4 of 4) (CC-1; Rev. 11-75':) (�( • PE! 'ORMANCE BOND Bond No.C- R 6317166 r: The premium for this bond is s4,439.00 payable in advance and subject to adjust- ment at current manual rates. ten, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION i iBW14M'S FWD AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY ........� r ne.� HOME OFFICE:SAN FRAN^-ISCO.CALIFORNIA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, BASALT ROCK COMPANY, INC. as Principal, and TUE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation organized under the laws of the State of NEW JERSEY and duly authorized under the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA to become sale surety on bonds and under- taking, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CONTRA COSTA COUNTY as Obligee in the full and just sum of SIX HUNDRED FORTY SIX THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED FIFTY & OOf 100ths---------- DoIlars, ($ 646,450.00 ), lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Obligee, successors or assigns; for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, successors, administrators and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The Condition of the above Obligation is such that whereas the said Principal has entered into a contract of even date herewith with the said Obligee to do and perform the following work, to-wit: DETENTION FACILITY PRECAST CONCRETE — FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF PRECAST CONCRETE UNITS, INCLUDING ANCHORAGE DEVICES, SUPPORTS INSERTS AND FASTENINGS, ALL IN ACCRODANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE �•, ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL (PROJECT NO. 5269-926—(50)) 1 as is more specifically set forth in said contract, to which contract reference is hereby made; Now therefore, if the said Principal shall well and truly do the said work, and fulfill each and every of the covenants, conditions and •equirements of the said contract in accordance with the plans and specifications, then the above obligation to be void, otherwise to emain in full force and virtue. Jo right of action shall accrue under this bond to or for the use of any person other than the Obligee named herein. 1 1 +3ealed with our seals and dated this 12th day of DECEMBER 14 77 ' I BASALT RO 'k COMPANY, IN • JACK: 9ftt' LOW. PRESIDI .N Principal AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety t Microfilmed with board order gy David W. Sing At omay-in-Fact 34Q039-5.65 EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE t Utz STATB.OF+CALTMMA On this —l.Ssh....»......day of--ow"ker»in Me yaw am thomsu d WOW %.r A hun&W ard-..--27-....-»:b4bro iaR Urch CnUNTYOF --.»...-.—..»-�»-_ a NoW7 Pubic,State of CaWb ak duly commitsiomW mid suwm peno"Y appeared .._......».....»._...«...». ....»._.�.. _ lut=W toms t0 bs the Prncy,;rlyrtt. »..«»•»- of the corporstlon dast r*W in anti 6W axwoted the �i1 liMiT�it!'-=4 OAd aho li"ti~ to me to be the pell0il»..... who sweat go ut0da lnt ft next on b&f of�tyle coMomtim tgrltge!!!lu11!ltiilallle um = therstn nmtwt; and aC>ftsomled/si to me tint awk eatpomtion =wutsd the LFNABIRCH Ssans............... ----_...........................«.................._..,...».....»,.....» '" � IN WITj"W A+fWXWy I lass ha runto set my hand and off xed my official .. ��.:., gtpTARY Pi382.iC--Gtt3Ft?fL�1iA � . PRINCIPAL OFFICE Lv County ol:: �t�A�..»«»»-..«.»the day and c� NAPA COUNTY = stat in Elis...�..«..»...., My Ccrnr+rission Fx�s Avti�st 31,1978 Year in this cer ficate�t ODM talitten. Notery Public,State oJCdifornis» r � 1Prnod S172 cordon's Som ria u-l�ckaaesistl�ewlt cierr.awo.(C c Secs. ft901) _�_ _ . ... .. of CAUFORNIA4."o :%TY ' t7 of SAN MAKI Le On December 12, 1977 , before me,a Notary Public In and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared David W. Sing known to me to be Attone -in-Fact of the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument and known to me to be the person who executed r the said instrument in behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF.f have hereunto set my}land and afft"d my official seal the an ear s ed in this certifiicat e. • 1.,„r-, N. STANSBEIRY My Commission Expi - "T.cRY PUBLIC - caUFaatiia r .,;" SR i FAivCi3C0 COU-4TY lSotary Public fSy Con�ss o�Expirm Mcr. 16,1978 360212-.6-66 Microfilmed with board order PA':MENT BOND—PUBLIC WORKS Bond No. C- R 6317166 FIREMAN'S FIREMAN'S FUNO INSURANCE COMPANY THEAMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY FUND NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION C ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION AMERICAN AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE C OMPANIES HOME OFPICE: SAN FRANCISCO_CALIFORNIA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we, BASALT ROCK COMPANY, INC.. as Principal, and THE AMERICAN.IINSURANCE COMPANY ,incorporated under the laws of the State of NEV JERSEY and authorized to execute bonds and undertakings as sole surety, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto any and all persons named in California Civil Code Section 3181 whose claim has not been paid by the contractor, company or corporation, in the aggregate totalof THREE HUNDRED TWENTY THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE & 00/100ths– ------ 323,225.00 l� for the payment whereof, well and truly to be made, said Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs,administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The Condition of the foregoing obligation is such that; whereas the above bounden Principal has entered into a contract, dated DECEMBER 12 , 19 77, with the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY to do the following work, to-wit.DETENTION FACILITY PRECAST CONCRETE – FABRICATION AND ERECTION OF PRECAST WITHRPLLAANSNAND'SPECIFICATIONSHPREPAREDREGE YEOk FORPTHESPUBLICC WORKS DAND IRECTOR XRb INGS NLACCORDAANCE C WITH THE ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL (PROJECT NO. 5269-926–(50)) Y low, Therefore, if the above bounden Principal, contractor, person, company or corporation, or his or its sub-contractor, fails to pay any claimant named in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code, with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, that, the Surety on this bond will pay the same, in an amount not exceeding the aggregate sum specified in this bond, and also, in case suit is brought upon this bond, a reasonable attorney's fee. which shall be awarded by the court to the prevailing party in said suit, said attorney's fee to be taxed as costs in said suit. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any person named in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California so as to give a right of action to them or their assignees in any suit brought upon this bond. ` I This bond is executed and filed to comply with the provisions of the act of Legislature of the State of California as designated in t Civil Code,Sections 3247-3252 inclusive,and all amendments thereto. . I -igned and Sealed this 12th day of DECEMBER 19 77. BASALT ROC COMP ,�INCPrin ,� Jac;: 3 LOW. PRESIDI-N7. Tft AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety I By David W. Sing Attorney-in-Fact 360099-1-71 Microfilmed with board order IN DUPLICATE /�'1 ,,,� ` 1 I 6 . Y STA 12 OFCdLifml�lIILI On fhb »..:.1+Sxh........_dij,W»-December»in the Yew one thousand nine "OLM"OF ..M&PA_.. }ML htndned end____2Z....-...before std • a Madwy PW tie,Sub of CoNamik d&dy conmumned and swop;pusondly �..ed 1V,1f srr blQW...... .._.. _.. Moa io nee to be dna_.........PMOS I"iettl>w.--.»» of the corporation dewrhed ie end that ea wuW the within inshument. and also known to me to be the who ecumW On within instniment on behalf of the corporation LENA BIRCH - tAaeiie +.eA d whNO SW to me that such corporation executed the '• NOT C—CALIFORD" . PRINWAL OFFI C] IN r. `s .. NAPA COUNTY ° IN WlTMM VJMAWF I hue hereunto set my hoed and af/Lred my official • qty o f Napa _ Aueusl 31,1970 = seal be the »....» _.»._the day and Nty Comm:sin+ExPW+■ 2yar in this Mofi aft Wow written. Bin s _ owy / / N Stets o Cali aerie Cowdesy's Form No.29—Acknawkdpmot Cwpondoe(C C Sem 1190-1190.1) Printed S172 tate oU► f CAUADM Y � uatr of SAN FRANCJCO= December 12, 1977 On , baton may a N Public in and for said County and State, residing therein. duly commissioned and swam. personail7 appeared Cid W. TH4 A. a Known to me to be Attcrney4n-Fact of 't' ,t+. C i �;`;;�Ta � ; ,° 1 C01 TMINTY the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument,and known to me to he the person who executed the said instrument in behalf of the.said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. .r IN WITNESS WHEREOF.I have hereunto stet ase band and affixed mt official the stated is this certiff a va. • P1. STMSUERRY ".My Commission MMAMV pjUSC.CAUFORNIA Av •� Notos7 Public My Cseaesim Ettgires Par.16,1978 360212-6-" l - - J Microfilmed with board order il026J GENERAL ATHE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY ATTORNEY eR JMOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY. a Corpurattun duly organized and existing tinder the law:: of the State of New Jersey, and having its Home Office in the City and County'of San Francisco, California, has made, con:tituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint -"--DAVID W. SING----- it:: true and lawful Altorney(s)-in-Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred in its name, place and stead, to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds, undertakings, recognizances or other written obliga- tionsin the nature thereof --------------------------------------------------��_-_- and to bind the Corporation thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President, sealed with the corporate seal of the Corporation and duly attested by its Secretary. hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorneys)-in- Fact may do in the premises. This power of attorney is granted pursuant to Article VIII, Section 30 and 31 of By-laws of THE A14ERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY now in full force and effect. -'Arm-le Vill. Api-i to int and Auth,ntp of Rcsidrnl Assistant Sccretarir/, and Atlorecy-in-Fact and'Aornts to areept Legal Process and Araks .t lIl h'nfn nrf%. Section 30. Appuinlinciet. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President, any VIce-President or any other person authorized by the Board of Diroclors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors the President or any Vice-President,may,from time to time,appoint Resident Assistant Secretaries cad Altorneys-in-Fact to represent and act for and on beholf of the Corporation and Agents to accept legal process and make appewancas for and on behalf of the Corporation. ....tt.m 31. Aolhurito. Th.• Authority of such Resident Assistant Secretaries, Attorneys-in-Fact, and Agenis shall be as prescribed in the instrument ,.Vi,I rn.tug their api-inimeut. and any such appointment and all authority granted thereby may be revoked at any time by the Board of Directors or 1.t .iny 1r•r-on t'tntr.w.•md In make such appointment." 'ran:: power of atlorney is signed and sealed under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 28th day of September, 1966, and that said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "RESOLVED, that the signature of any Vice-President. Assistant Secretary, and Resident Assistant Secretary of this Corporation, and tln• seal of thi: Corporation may be affixed or printed on any power of attorney, on any revocation of any power of attorney, or on ntiy certificate relating thereto. by facsimile, and any power of attorney, any revoca;ior of any power of attorney, or certificate bearing ..urh facnitnile signature or fac::imile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Corporation" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice-President, and its corps,rate seal to be hereunto affixed this_. 11 th day of Agri 1 ,.w THE AMERICA)] INSURANCE COMPANY e �+ Vice-President STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO J} SIL On this 11 thday of-_ __.—APC1_l.. 1977, before me personally came—Wi]_.0 jm Wit aiih2r ki este known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he is Vice President of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, flu.• Corporrttion described in and which executed the above instrument: that he knows the seal of said Corporation; that the seal affixed to flw slid instnunt•nt is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said Corporation and that he signed his rninte flivreto by like order. 1N WI'rNFSS WHF.RL'OF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year herein first above written. twwn.tlr.tauntww�l� OFFICIAL SEAL , SUSIE K. GIUERT «� �� NOTARY��a&W� Not6iy Publie lb Cotrtraiafstt �Ilss. 17, MN CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, j CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 1, flu' midersigned, Assistant Secretary of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a NEW JERSEY Corporation, DO HEREBY 0:11111"Y Ihnt Ihc, loreg.nng and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remain.; in full Icrce and has not been revoked: and furthermore that Article Vlll• St-clions 30 and 31 of the Ry-laws of the Corpora:ion, and the Resolution of the Board of Directors, set forth in the Riwor ul Atf..rnry. etre now in force. Signed and sealed at the City and County of Sari Francisca Dated cL Dec mher lg 77 t..�w ��_ - Microfilmed with board order' Assistant Secretary 360546(NO) —TA-- II-76 00269 J I ROYAL ti GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANIES CERT1FiCATE OF INSURANCE Newled r Basalt Rock Company, Inc. , r JOHNSON & HIGGINS OF CALIFORMA, '^ewe P.O. Box 2540P„decM 601 CALIFORNIA STREET Ara«. Napa, California 94558 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. 94108 L J L J The policies indicated herein apply with respect to the hazards and for the coverage and limits of liability indicated by specific entry herein,subject to all the terms and conditions of such policies.This certificate is issued as a matter of information only,and confers no rights on the holder.It imposes no liability upon the Company and does not amend, extend,or alter in any way the coverage or the limits of liability afforded by any of the policies designated herein. COMPANY DATE ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 12-5-77 COVERAGES AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY HAZARDS POLICY NUMBER EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION BODILY INJURY LIABILITY PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY DATE DA 1E EACH FMCIN EACH OCCURRENCE EACH OCCUH[rsCE AGGR*GAIE Premises-Operations PTG 350013 5.1.77 5.1.$1 S 1,000•000 s Inc]. '000 5,00,000 Ele.otors 66 66 66 s .000 s IIIc]. .000 s IIIc].•000 Independent Contractors s• 46 s a s ,. ,000 s Incl. .000 s Inc].,000 s 5.000000 Products Completed 66 66 66 t — 000 s Incl. •000 s !ncL•000 s 5 00000° Operations AGGREGATE+ s 5 0Q0•o00 Contractual-os it It rt described belo.i s — .000 s Inc]. .000 s Ina]. ,000 s 5s00000o Automobile Lidwiltr Owned Automobiles 66 a s 64 s .000 s Cl. .000 s IncL 000 Hired Automobiles 66 46 s s s .000 sirngq000 tire..i ,000 Non-paned Automobiles X e 64 s♦ s .000 s clo. ,Doo s ,000 Wori,eewe Cowl0esteNiew COMPENSATION STATUTORY STATE IS) Self Insured Ce tificate #1516 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS, AUTOMOBILES. CONTRACTS, ETC (FOR CONTRACTS, INDICATE TYPE Or AGREfMENT, PARTY AND DATE.) In the event of any material change in or cancellation of the policy(s), the Company will notify the certificate holder in writing thirty (30) days prior to such change or cancellation. Re: Project No. 5269-926-(50) - Detention Facility Precast Concrete. Additional Insured Endorsement No. 1550 attached. 'IF LIMITS OF LIABILITY DIFFER FROM POLICY LIMITS, CHECK HERE: El (—Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. —1 This is to certify that The Company named herein has usued County Administration Bldg. — 6th Floor issued to the Named Insured the policies listed above. ALTke 651 Pine St. �� Martinez, CA 94553 LAttn: Thomas M. Finley, Detention Facilig Project Manager mg" .4ulbtot;cr-,f nr p „r,r►„e C.L.20798G Microfilmed with board order �)�l '`i'o ENDORSEMENT _ ,;,o Type policy number only, in this secUoi) above the heavy line, IF issued with policy and attuchr)ient slated in policy declarations. — 1.: S,CSIED DY Unless otherwise stated, this endorsement forms a part of the policy to which ") !ysn�,tY.�E attached as of issue, provided such attachment is stated in the policy declarations. Otherwise, this endorsement is issued for attachment to and forms a part of the policy numbered below, effective only on the date indicated on this endorsement -----�zEo RENRisEdrAilvE� C but at the same time or hour of the day as the policy became erective. Edti'. A}Y PPEIAIUM f ENO.EFF.DATE POLICY SYMBOL&M.MBER ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY tMo.,DAY.YR.) ❑ AddT [] Return $ 15-1-77 1 PTG 3500013 Named Insured(and address,zip code,:when necessary for mailing))--t Producer(and address,zip code,for mailing) —7 I � 1 Basalt Rock Company, Inc. Johnson & Higgins of Calif. P.O. Box 2540 601 California Street Napa, Calif. 94558 San Francisco, Calif. 94108 L J L J ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT It is understood and agreed Contra Costa County, its officers, employees and agents are named as additional insureds solely as respects the Project No. 5269-926-(50) - Detention Facility Precast Concrete. Microfilmed with board order 0..1) '11 End. No. 1550 CL 200308-•Sets - . 1 FORM A 4-12 (REv 6P5) STATE OF CALIFORNIA—AGRICULTURE AND SERVICES AGENCY EDMUND G.6ROM01 JR..Gavonwr c DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADDRESS XWY TOe SELF'-INSURANCE PLANS 1006 FOURTH STREET SECOND FLOOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SACRAMENTO. CA, 95814 CERTIFICATE OF SELF-INSURANCE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION To whom it may concern: THIS CERTIFIES THAT CERTIFICATE OF CONSENT TO SELF-INSURE NO. 153A WAS ISSUED TO: _BASALT ROCK COMPANY, INC.—(a California corporationL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 3700, LABOR CODE OF CALIFORNIA, ON April 1, 1973 , AND SAID CERTIFICATE IS NOW AND HAS BEEN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT SINCE THAT DATE, DONALD VIAL DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT or INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS DATED AT SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA THIS 12th DAY of Dacember, 1977 MANAGER, SELF-INSURANCE PLANS !kns cc: Basalt Rock Company, Inc. Microfilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 11ovember 29 , 1977 In the Motter of Resignation from the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council. Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having advised that he had received a November 18, 1977 letter from firs. Thelma Mosca tendering her resignation as a representative of Supervisorial District V on the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignation of Mrs. Mosca is ACCEPTED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to issue a Certificate of Appreciation for her cervices. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Contra Costa County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Community Development Supervisors Advisory Council affixed this 29th day of NovpmhPr 19]Z_ Director of Planning County Auditor-Controller County Administrator - ��• R.(�OLSSON, Clerk Public Information Officer gym rk crrr�' Deputy Clerk _�Aonda Amdahl ii` ,A,l 0021^3 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 1977 ' 19 In the Matter of Contract Extension #20-006-3 with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. for Six Month Continuation of Workshop Transportation Services for Mentally Retarded Adults The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, regarding the need to extend the workshop transportation contract with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. for six (6) months, in order to main- tain service and prevent an interruption in the transportation of mentally retarded adults currently attending the activity workshops operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded, so that changes in State regulations can be ascertained and followed; and The Board having authorized negotiations for such contract by its order dated October 4, 1977; IT IS BY THE oOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract Extension #20-006-3 with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. , for the term from October 1, 1977, through March 31, 1978, under Title XX of the Social Security Act, increasing the contract payment limit by $51,660, and under terms and conditions as more particulary set forth in said Contract Extension. PASSED BY THE BOARD on NOV 2 9 1977 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this day of N(1V `? 9 1977, 19 County Auditor/Controller County Welfare Director Contractor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 4„`'/�-%u,_; ,tt, /. L i Deputy Clerk RJP:sh 002t , H-24 4/77 15m CCC Standard Form M,av 1974 EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) 1 . Contract Identification: (lumber� :1 V1 Number: 20-006-2 Department: Social Service Subject: Workshop transportation services for mentally retarded adults Effective Date: October 1, 1976 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa, California (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: "lame: MARTINEZ BUS LIVES, INC. Capacity: Private-for-profit California corporation Address: P.O. Box 607, Martinez, California 94553 (3300 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez) 3. Extension of Term: The term of the above described contract between the parties hereto is hereby extended from October 1, 1977 to March 31, 1978 , unless sooner terminated as provided in said contract. 4. Pavment Linit: As to the extended term of the contract, the maximum amount payable by the County is increased by the following amount S 51,660 5. Other provisions: As to the term during which the above described contract is extended, the parties mutually agree to those Special Provisions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 6. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY F'COK'A cwrA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR Q RTINEZ BU' LINES, INC.) By l/ oggess By _ airman, ndrd of Supervisors Attest: County Clerk /'Ct �/ Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal ) Oeputy Robbie] tierre2 State of California ) ss. County of Contra Costa ) Recommended by Human Resources Agency ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor By known to me in those individual and. Designee business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they signed it and that the corpora- tion or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. HRA Contracts Administrator Form Approved: Mouasklx Dated: �P.�u-Qc.A., �/,/J. 77 By Alegi— ,Ctp&t�X Designe Deputy Yo6ty Clerk ROLK-N J. DEPUTY C1tJ :; ; C-LERK Ccniru C::ta Ccr'fiornia 002"110 J � SPECIAL PROVISIONS G Number 2 0 " " O 6 — 3 In accordance with Paragraph S. (Other Provisions) of this Contract Extension, County and Contractor agree to modify the Contract identified herein, effective Oztober 1 , 1977, as specified below, while all other parts of said Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 1. Change in Project. For the purpose of this extension agreement only, the Project description specified in Paragraph 8. (Project) of the Contract is hereby modified to read as follows : "California State Annual Statewide Social Services Plan for Fiscal Year 1977-78, and any revisions or modifications thereof." 2. Change in Legal Authority. The legal authority specified in Paragraph 9. (Legal Authority) of the Contract is hereby modified to read as follows : "Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, as amended (P.L. 93-647); 42 USCA Section 1397ff; California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703." 3. Change in Payment Amounts. The fee rate specified in Subparagraph b., Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) , of the Payment Provisions is hereby amended, effective October 1, 1977, by increasing the amount from $5.16 to the new fee rate of "$5.80 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan". 4. Change in Workshop Facility Locations. The locations of the workshop facilities specified in Paragraph 1. (Service) page 1, of the Service Plan are hereby changed to read as follows : "a. 490 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill; b. 610 and 630 West 10th Street, Pittsburg; and c. 3563 San Pablo Dam Road, Richmond (El Sobrante) ." 5. Change in Special Transportation Service. The last sentence in Paragraph 1. (service) , pave 1, of the Service Plan is hereby amended, effective October 1, 1977, to read as follows: "Contractor shall also provide occasional special transportation for regular enrollees having a temporary change of residence, to transport such enrollees on a short-term basis (not to exceed approximately 21 days at a time) between their new, temporary residence (e.g., a residential respite care facility) and their regular workshop, as prescribed above, providing that the enrollee' s new, temporary residence is located in the same general area of the County as the enrollee' s permanent residence (i.e., in the western, central, or eastern area of the County) ." 6. Chance in Service Unit Payment Rate. The service unit payment rate specified in Paragraph S. (Service Unit) , page 3, of the Service Plan is hereby amended, effective October 1, 1977, by increasing the amount from $5.16 to the new fee rate of "$5.80 per enrollee per day." 7. Change in State Plan Designation. The State Plan designated in Paragraph 1. (Compliance with Federal and State Requirements) of the Special Conditions is hereby modified to read as follows : "California State Annual Statewide Social Services Plan for Fiscal Year 1977-78, with respect to 'Services for Disabled Individuals' ." Initials: Contractor Coun y Dept. 0�) `�'� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California rd OV '2 9 1977 ' 19 In the Matter of Contract #20-004-3 with the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded, Inc. , To Provide Activity Workshop Services for Mentally Retarded Adults IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #20-004-3 with the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded, Inc., for provision of activity workshop services from October 1, 1977, through September 30, 1978, for mentally retarded adults under Title XX of the Social Security Act with a Contract Payment limit of $226,930, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. PASSED BY THE BOARD on N OV 2 9 1977 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator axed this day of-NJ 0V 2 9 3C177 , 19 County Auditor/Controller County Welfare Director Contractor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �i �i, , /.cam/ .1� Deputy Clerk RobbiVr7ufierrez 002" Pp4 07 15m County Standard Forri STAIvDAI:D CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 9 () - '. 1. Contract Identification Number Deaart:*ent : Social Service Subject: Activity workshop services for mentally retarded adults (Services for Disabled Individuals) Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County) , for its Department named anovo, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR THE 14ENTALLY RETARDED, INC. Capacity: Nonprofit California corporation Address: 2717 North Main Street, Walnut Creek, California 94596 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is October 1, 1977, and it terninates September 30, 1478, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not eycee,,' $ 226,930 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Pa}Went Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: California State Annual Statewide Social Services Plan for Fiscal Year 1977-78, and any revisions or modifications thereof. 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the fol.locaing legal authorities: Title XX ,o£ the U. S. Social Security Act, as amended (P.L. 93-647) ; 42 USCG Section 1397ff; California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703. A. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COI' . Y1 iC STA, CALIF090 CONTRACTOR B / W. N. By 4�,J,4 Ma AA 9 A7, Chairman, Board of Supervisors �. /CGU/JY� .� (Designate official capac-ty in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal.) State of California ) ss. BCounty of Contra Costa ) R ie Gutierre Deputy ACM014LEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Department known to me in those individual and /l business capacities, personally appeared � before me today and acknowledged that he/ Bye CCLtk� /` i12 � they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws HRA Contracts Administrator or a resolution of its board of directors. Form Approved: Dated: $v Designee kL2D\� -Eounty-CterJR _l. r-o "I"NC(_Contra C_:'u Coun'.Y, Cali •), (A-4617 REV 6/76) Cuntra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number M 0 0 4 1. Palm ent Basis. County shall 'in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to the Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor: [Check one alternative only. [ J a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [X] c. An amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] [X] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular FMC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost) , and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or [ ] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allowable costs. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 2. (Payment mounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. 002'r' (A-4618 REV 6/76) -1- Calera Costa County Standard Form PAYZMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor wl^'-n, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is i;:sufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the t«mination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the f.,fm required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred b:: Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs t :at have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments v:_de by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will ramit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contr-act, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlein_ant) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a. result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. (A-4618 REV 6/76) -2- Q��0VA U SERVICE PLAN Number 0 0 3- 1. Service Specifications. Contractor shall render for County under this Contract certain administration and staff services to provide an Activity Work_:hop Program for mentally retarded adults who have little or no potential for gainful employment but who require a structured day activity program to enable them to maintain and improve their ability to function independently in the family and community, to be self-sufficient, and to be partially self-supporting. This service includes full-time supervision and individually designed, developmental activities co,.prised of skill training and work experiences, individual and group counseling for handling personal problems and functional handicaps, social and recreational experiences, and specialized training for better grooming, self-care, social adjustment, and home management. 2. Service Delivery. Contractor shall administer the above service program to serve at least 91 (full-time equivalent) enrollees each month, subject to sufficient referrals from County, 5 days per week, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. , excluding regularly scheduled holidays, as follows: a. Activity Outline. Contractor will conduct the service program and seek to accomplish program objectives in accordance with the following activity outline: (1) Personal Adjustment. Contractor' s program shall cover such areas as personal hygiene, grooming, dress, manners, and appropriate behavior. Objectives are to help the enrollee: (a) Develop an understanding of good health and its relationship to good grooming; (b) Learn skills in body cleanliness and care; and (c) Develop a desire to select, wear, and care for clothing. (2) Social Adjustment. Contractor' s program shall cover social behavior, use of leisure time, recreation, table manners, and relationships with peers and authority. Objectives are to help the enrollee: (a) Develop respect for himself and others; (b) Attain poise to make him more a "part of society;" (c) Learn good manners and common courtesy; (d) Develop personality traits necessary for successful human relationships; and (e) Gain a knowledge of leisure-time activities available in the community and assist him in finding those activities best suited to his interests and abilities. (3) Work Adjustment and Community Living Skills. Contractor' s program shall cover training in appropriate relationships with other enrollees and employees, supervision, being punctual, the meaning of work, remedial academic instruction, and efficiency of performance. Objectives are to help the enrollee: (a) Develop an understanding of the relationship of work to daily living; (b) Learn basic requirements necessary to work; (c) Develop an appreciation for the value of money, an under- standing of the various types of buying, and how to use money correctly; (d) Develop homemaking skills, learn family economics, and develop a concept of family living; (e) Develop self-confidence in such areas as communication skills and use of transportation services; (f) Develop an awareness of safety regulations; and (g) Learn about laws and their importance. Initials: _L` " Contractor County Dept. SERVICE PLAN Number 0 3 (4) Work Sanpling, Work Evaluation and Job Station Placement. Contractor' s program shall cover testing and evaluation on specific types of work to determine the enrollee' s needs and capabilities relative to further training; provide periodic review and extensive evaluation at various work stations with counseling and remedial instruction; and provide long-term job station placement within the activity workshop and any supervised community work experience. Objectives are to : (a) Develop a work profile for each enrollee; (b) Provide remunerative (at no cost to County under this Contract) and non-remunerative work activity for indefinite periods of time to individuals who appear to be unemployable in the competitive labor market; and (c) Make professional evaluations at regular intervals, to identify those individuals who have developed sufficient behavioral and vocational skills to move into transitional training or directly into the competitive labor market. b. Activity Workshop Program. Contractor will : (1) Provide a professionally supervised and staffed program of activity workshop services in accordance with the below specified Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures and the following staffing description: of Time Staff Under Position Number Contract Job Description Facility 3 50 Responsible for the management of a work Manager activity center for mentally retarded adults. Overall personnel supervision. Production 4 55 Responsible for sheltered employment Foreman program, including customer contracts. Supervises production supervisors. Production 3 55 Responsible for the evaluation, training Supervisor II and job development program for the mentally retarded trainees in the sheltered employment program. Production 9 55 Responsible for the production work, Supervisor I including flow of work and training the mentally retarded enrollees in work- related activities. Development 3 60 Responsible for the personal development Coordinator and social adjustment program, including independent living skills and basic education. Development 3 60 Responsible for the evaluation, training Supervisor II and social adjustment and personal development program for the enrollees within the development section. Development 3 60 Responsible for assigned activities Supervisor I in the personal and social adjustment programs. Administrative 3 60 Performs the administrative support Secretary functions necessary for the operation of the facility. Involves numerous contacts with the enrollees, parents, community agencies, and volunteers. Initials: _ ont� County Dept. -2- 00282 SERVICE PLAN Number r10 �10 4 " (2) Provide County with periodic enrollee progress reports at least every 5 months, giving professional assessments of each enrollee' s potential to unction independently, to be self-sufficient, and to be partially self-supporting. 3. General Operations. As part of its performance hereunder, Contractor also will : a. Secure and maintain appropriate facility space and equipment and employ quali-fied and professional staff (as set forth in the above staffing description) sufficient to provide the full range of services specified herein. b. Provide necessary information as required by County for County' s recertification of each enrollee' s eligibility for receipt of services. c. Keep records on each enrollee which will include eligibility and certi- fication information provided by County, health and safety information, services provided, results obtained, program objectives attained, and daily attendance with dates for enrollees beginning and terminating service under this Contract. d. Provide County with periodic information (reports and evaluations) regarding enrollees in the time and manner prescribed by County, including, but not limited to, a service activity report summarizing all services provided and program objectives attained, an enrollee progress report showing the status and progress of each enrollee in the service program, and an enrollee attendance report showing the daily attendance of each enrollee in the service program. Contractor shall also report the daily attendance of its workshop clients who are not funded under this Contract but for whom County is purchasing bus transportation services to Contractor' s workshops. e. Advise the County promptly if any enrollee served under this Contract discontinues participation or enrollment in Contractor' s service program. f. Notify the County immediately, should Contractor exercise the right to terminate any enrollee from services. g. Advise enrollees under this Contract who are dissatisfied with any action taken by Contractor of their right to present grievances with respect to the provision of services hereunder. Contractor shall establish a fair hearing system whereby enrollees may present such grievances. h. Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and municipal regulations and ordinances governing health and safety. i. Utilize for the provision of services under this Contract, but not be limited to, the workshop facilities located at: (1) 490 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill; (2) 610 and 630 West 10th Street, Pittsburg; and (3) 3563 San Pablo Dam Road, Richmond (E1 Sobrante) . Contractor shall notify County of the use of any additional facilities. j. Comply with all State licensing standards, all applicable accrediting standards, and any other standards or criteria established by the State to assure quality of services. Contractor shall maintain the appropriate license and/or accreditation throughout the term of this Contract and provide County with valid documentation of such licensing and accreditation, upon request. k. Provide staff orientation and in-service training in order to maintain and continuously improve the professional competence of program staff and the quality of services, and provide County with such reports on training activities as nay be requested by County. Initials : Contractor Coun y Dept. -3- 00283 SERVICE PLAN Number f) — 0 '✓ 4 — S 1 . Cooperate with County in identifying and referring eligible workshop e :ollees to County' s bus service provider for workshop transportation services a_ W_: be authorized by County. Contractor shall verify workshop attendance for e_._ollees in connection with their use of said transportation services on a daily Contractor shall provide the bus service provider with a current time sz'-edole and list of nares and addresses of enrollees authorized for use of said transportation services to allow for the timely transportation of such enrollees bat eon their homes and Contractor' s workshop facilities. M. Cooperate with County' s bus service provider in working out routes and time schedules to conform to workshop schedules and safety conditions as necessary t:) e.F;ect the timely transport of enrollees authorized for said transportation services between their homes and the workshop facilities. Contractor shall evaluate .:_.a approve the acceptability of such routes and schedules prior to their implementa- t_on. As appropriate, Contractor shall provide the bus service provider with a>?ropriate and timely information concerning the anticipated absences, the health and physical condition, and the personal and social adjustment of enrollees in connection with said transportation services. 4. Enrollee Eligibility. Services under this Contract shall only be provided to persons who meet all of the following eligibility requirements; each enrollee =ust be. a. Referred and certified as being eligible for receipt of services, by written authorization from County, prior to service delivery and for a specified period, showing the beginning and ending dates of service eligibility, and b. - Age 18 or over (as required by Contractor' s enrollment standards) . County shall pay Contractor for authorized services to eligible enrollees as herein -provided for that period of service eligibility which is authorized by County for each such enrollee or until such time as County notifies Contractor of a cessation of eligibility, if an enrollee' s eligibility is terminated before the end of the authorized service period. 5. Conformity with Federal Cost Regulations. In accordance with and subject to Paragraph 3. (Allowable Costs) , page 1, of the Payment Provisions, the allowability of Contractor' s costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles set .Forth in "A Guide for Non-Profit Institutions (Cost Principles and Procedures for =stab lishing Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare," as issued by the U. S. Department of health, Education, and Welfare, Assistant Secretary, Controller, James B. Cardwell (58 pages) . 6. Audit Report. On or before November 30, 1978, or as otherwise authorized by County, Contractor shall submit to County an audit report, prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant, verifying Contractor's cost report submitted under Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) , page 2, of the Payment Previsions. Said audit shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted audit standards, including the "Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions" (issued by the U. S. Comptroller General, 1972, 54 pp.) . One thousand dollars ($1,000) of the Contract Payment Limit shall be budgeted by Contractor to procure said audit report. 7. Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures. Contractor shall provide services u-der this Contract in accordance with the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference. Specific line item bud:et amounts may vary by up to 15% without approval from County. Specific line it e= budget amounts may vary in excess of 15% and appropriate line item budget caategories may be added, but only with prior written authorization from the County Edman Resources Agency Director or his designee. All budget changes are subject to, the Contract Paydent Limit. Initials : Contractor County Dept. -4- 0028-4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS O � 0 'T - 3" Number x 1. Compliance with Federal and State Requirements. Without any limitation upon its obligations under Paragraph 1. Compliance with Law) , page 1, of the General Conditions, Contractor shall comply with all Federal and State regulations, circulars, orders, guidelines, and directives pertaining hereto, including Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter II, Part 228, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, as amended, and the California State Annual Statewide Social Services Plan, July 1, 1977 — June 30, 1978, with respect to "Services for Disabled Individuals." 2. Source of Funds. This Contract is funded under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act by a combination of County money (25%) and federal social services funds (75%) allocated to the County by the State of California. The County provides the local matching share for contract costs and receives reimbursement for the federal share from the State as follows : County matching funds (25%) $ 56,732 Federal funds (75X) 170,198 Total (Contract Payment Limit) $ 226,930 County guarantees that the County share of funding for this Contract does not consist of Federal funds. 3. Preference in Training and Employment. Contractor shall give preference in employment and training to public assistance recipients, when appropriate and required by applicable State or Federal laws or regulations. initials: l o—g 11V Contractor Coudtj Dept. BUDGET OF ESTIIATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES Number 2 - 0 0 `r - 3 ACTIVITY WORKSHOP PROGRAM (1) (10/1/77 through 9/30/78) Gross Less Portion Non-Prod. Net Program Production Program Contract Costs Income Costs (2) Costs (3) DIRECT PROGRAM COSTS Staff Salaries $299,532 $ 65,139 $234,393 $126,868 Fringe Benefits 33,000 7,176 25,824 13,978 Occupancy, Supplies, Repairs 97,100 21,116 75,984 41,127 Travel, Transp., Meetings 6,500 1,414 5,086 2,753 Depreciation 9,000 1,957 7,043 3,812 Dues, Licenses, Fees 800 174 626 339 Services, Public Programs 1,750 381 1,369 741 Truck & Van Operation 5,500 1,196 4,304 2,330 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $453,182 $ 98,553 $354,629 $191,948 CENTAL ADM-IN. (PRO-RATA) Salaries 4 $ 33,763 $ 7,342 $ 26,421 $ 14,301 Fringe Benefits 3,774 821 2,953 1,598 Other (occupancy, insur., etc.) 42,692 9,284 33,408 18,083 TOTAL ADMIN. COSTS $ 80,229 $ 17,447 $ 62,782 $ 33,982 TOTAL ALL COSTS $533,411 $116,000 $417,411 $225,930 Audit Report 1,000 TOTAL (CONTRACT PAYMENT LIMIT) $226,930 Notes : (1) Budget does not include an estimated $64,800 for the fiscal year which certain program staff receive in salary (Adult Education Subvention) directly from the local school districts for teaching basic education to enrollees as a regular part of the total Workshop Program; this money is neither a cost nor income to Contractor's program operation. (2) For an estimated 168 (full-time equivalent) enrollees. (3) For an estimated 91 (full-time equivalent) enrollees. Full-time equivalency shall be defined as the attendance of a County-referred enrollee such that the enrollee is absent not more than 4 days in any one calendar month; the attendance of County enrollees who are absent 5 days or more in any one calendar month shall be pro-rated based on the actual number of days attended compared to the total number of available workshop days in that month. (4) Consists of an Executive Director, Program Manager, Financial Manager, and 3 Office Support Staff. , Initials : /f'ON Contractor County Dept. 0286 r Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. S. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph S.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contracc may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -1- Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a inisdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -2- r • Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails'or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. :ate (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 1977 , 19 — In the Matter of Additional Funding of Third Year (1977-78) Community Development Activity Number 40 The Board having this day considered the recommendation of the Community Development Advisory Council and the Director of Planning that it .approve additional funding for Third Year Community Development Activity 440 in the amount of $5,500 in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an additional $5,500 be reallocated from the contingency reserve to Third Year Activity #40. Passed by the Board on N0%1 9 9 1077 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Carqunez Women' s Club Supervisors Administrator NOV � 9 1977 Auditor-Controller affixed this day of 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By__4 ,. 7 �'-%r,C Deputy Clerk o bi- utter rPz 049 H-24 4/77 15m BEFORE -ME BOARD OF TIM CARQUINEZ WOMN CLUB COWY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In thr- matter of Amending ) Third Year (1977-78) ) Co-r-nunity Development Block ) RESOLUTION 77 - 78 - 2 Grant Program Project ) Agreement # 40 ) MIEREAS the Carquinez Women Club has executed a Project Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Program funds (11iird Year Activity 9 40) with Contra Costa County for the -purpose of restoration of the Old Home- stead Historical Monument, and MEREAS it was found that additional funds would be necessary to complete the restoration, and WHEREAS the Community Development Advisory Council has voted to recommend the allocation of additional funds to the Carquinez Women Club to complete the restoration of the Old Homestead, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of the Carquinez Women Club adopts the Amendment to the Project Agreement for the Third Year Community Develop- ment Activity # 40, and authorizes the President of the Carquinez Women Club to execute the budget amendment. AYES: Sven Boatright, Rosomond Le hcuf, Lcssie Nilson, Rena Whelehan,Lily Jackson, Mary Canziani, Ella Roberts, Ilarri-et Yates, Grace Martin, hazel De Lozier, Margaret Galway, Pauline Del Agostino, Evelyn Canga, EEfie Schandelmier, Mercedes Pallotta. NOES: None ABSENT: Genevieve Reeder, �,Iary Eckhardt, Betty Carone. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the Board of the Carquinez Women Club at a regular meeting of said Board on the 7th day of October, 1977. HAZEL1:LOZIER, S -CR ETARY 1117 ELLA ROBERT S, PRES I D1 N'1' 00 ..•�.�.:':..�.::-v:-mow.vi.".....r'.iv vv`.•�,:-;.t AMENDMENT TO PROJECT AGREEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK. GRANT PROGRAM (County and the Carquinez Women's Club - Third Year Activity 40) Section 1. Parties - Effective on August 15, 1977 the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the Carquinez Women's Club, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor", hereby amend their September 27, 1977 agreement entitled "PROJECT AGREEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM", as follows: Section 2. Alteration (a) "4. Allocation Payment Limit. County's total payment to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed $9,450." (b) "G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expenditures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERI•Y 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $9,450.00 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11 . COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $9,450.00 2. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning •Director or his designee 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presribed by County. " (c) "H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: 40 PAGE 1 OF 1 BUDGET PERIOD: July 1 , 1977-June 30, 1978 Original Amendment No. 1 i (a) (b) (c) BUDGET ITEM CD FUNDS - $ + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - $ Historic Site Renovation 9,217 9,217 Exterior Refinishing Bathroom Facilities Historic Plaque Landscaping Permits Contract Administration 233 233 Insurance (e) TOTAL $9,450 $9,450" 00293 Section 3. Reaffirmance Said September 27, 1977 agreement entitled "PROJECT AGREEMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM" except as hereinabove amended shall remain in f 1 force and effect. COU(ITY ov'0 OSTA CAL I FA Q A CONTRACTOR �5S By� �,: ✓i—tom""' i/%LGti�_iL"'��2 ' .•� /� Chairman, Board of Supe*rv' ors ATTEST: J.R.; OLSSON, ounty Clerk By Deputy pob4� Gutierrez Note to Contractor: . (1 ) If a public agency, designate official capacity in Recommended by Department public agency and attach a certified copy of the governing body resolution authorizing execution of this agreement. i' /tel (2) If a corporation, designate official capacity in business, execute By / achnowledgement form and affix corporation Des n— eerDirecto� nthony A. ' Dehaesus� seal . of Plannjng Foran Approved: County Counsel By Deputy' y STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Counil On this—Ai y of !���:L _nirs rhe ye one thotuand nine httrdred and � -Z _.._.._..be ore me a Notary Public, State of California, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared known to rete to be the person--whose name___1-5 ubscribed to the within instrument and ackno:vledged io me ih4t–=?LPe_executed the same. OFF:CI,\t SEAL �}, IN WITNESS TVHEREOF I hat hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal > t i in the _.County of L�—t rhe day and year in this certificate first abo✓r:critten. t• ! if vJ.r ..v'. /4./' _ -- ✓ ,/ Notay Public,State of California. Cowderp's Form No.32—Acknowledgment—General. (C.C.Sec. 1190x) My Coaunission Expires —_ 00494 � t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 1977 . 19 In the Matter of Approval of Title IV A Training Needs Study Contract for Area Office on Aging IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #20-160 with the Intergovernmental Management Development Institute (IlVDI) during the period August 15, 1977 to September 30, 1977 to provide a Title IV A training needs study for the Area Office on Aging at a cost of $2500 in State funds. PASSED BY THE BOARD on NOV 2 9 1977 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency ;'Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn; Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator County Audi'tor/Con trollelaffix&d this day of hint, 9 U 1477 , 19 Area Office on Aging Social Service J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By /<_ ,cc,c. .L/c.LL!__ Deputy Clerk Ra5!�iYJ�Yierrez EH:sh 7 0295 H-24 4177 15m 1 Cantra Costa County Standard='Form STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number 2 0 - 16 p' Department: Social Service Subject: Area Agency on Aging Training 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: INTERGOVERNMENTAL MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE (I.M.D.I.) Capacity: Corporation. Address: 125- 12th Street, Suite 160 Oakland, California 94607 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is and it terminates Seprembpr 30, 1977 unless sooner teiminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 9,500 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the avnlication and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Not Applicable 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: 42 USC §3021 et seq. ; 45 CFR §903.0 et seq. ; California Government Code 53703 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CO TY QF�ONT 0 TA CALIFORNIA2 CONTRACTOR By/ Boggess By� --�— Chairman, Board of Supervisors (Designate official capacity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) State of California ) By r L C County of Contra Costa ) ss. ' Ro Gutierrez Deputy ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Department known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bvla«s or a re of its board of irectors. Form Approved: County Counsel ! / Dated: / ,( BykJ =� ' Deputy r OFFICIAL SEAL Fr,T Rir;A A HARRIS on 00 ; 6 � E nl..,f moi•. t' �I,il�rt l (A-4617 REV 6/76) Contra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) Number 2 O — 1 6 l/ 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [x] c. $2500 after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided or incurred by Contractor hereunder. 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 1. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractors performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. 2'9'1 (A-4619 REV 6/76) SERVICE PLAN Number O — 16 O Contractor will provide a training-needs study for the Area Office on Aging to use as a basic planning tool for implementation of a Federal Title IV-A grant of the Older Americans Act of 1962, as amended, and subject to the applicable program regulations and federal and state laws. Contractor will coordinate all activities conducted under terms of this Contract with Area Office on Aging. Contractor's Training Needs Study will be conducted as follows, with estimated staff days if applicable: Preparation of Survey. Estimated Staff Days 1. Contractor will conduct surveys of: a. Staffs of programs serving older persons. b. Seniors served by those programs. c. Seniors not served by those programs. 2. Contractor's survey activities will be to: a. Meet with Area Office on Aging staff to determine content of survey, people 1/4 x 2 people = 1/2 to be surveyed, etc. b. Design preliminary surveys. Obtain approval by Area Office on Aging 1-3/4 + 1/2 clerical staff. c. Conduct a preliminary surveys test- run with key contacts. d. Redesign surveys as needed. 1/2 + 1/4 clerical e. Administer surveys. f. Compile results. 1 + 1 clerical Preparation of Training Needs Report. 1. Contractor's activities will be to: a. Analyze survey results 1/2 b. Prepare report containing narrative and quantitative 1-1/2 + 1 clerical data. c. Present to AAA staff for 1/4 x 2 people = 1/2 critique. Design of Training Plan. 1. Contractor's Training Plan will: a. Establish objectives for each training activity. b. Determine content, length, etc. of each training activity. 1-1/2 + 3/4 clerical c. Recommend service deliverers. d. Present plan to Area Office on Aging. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Paragraph 19, Insurance, of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. Initials: Contractor County Dept. Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County., the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. (A-4616 REV 6/76) l Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS + (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County., the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. S. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 0 14199 (A-4616 REV 6/76) Contra Costa County Standard Form a GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. :3o Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi— dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a inisdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 003- 0 (A-4616REV 6/76) -2- Contra Costa County Standard Form • GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California :November 29 ' 19622 In the Matter of _ Executive Session. At 10:25 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, to discuss personnel matters. At 10:50 a.m. the Board reconvened in its Chambers and proceeded with its regular agenda. a Matter of Record hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of)VW-(; { entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this )q r-uday of Ne 4 efabe;E_ 19-7-:�- Ln ' q J P1. OISSON, Clerk Bye Cfi- e ) Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl 00,302 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NoveTber 29 . 19 77 In the Matter of Certificate of Appreciation to tflrs. Eleanor Scott. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to EXECUTE a Certificate of Appreciation to ?yrs. Eleanor Scott in grateful acknowledgement of 40 years of her dedicated service in the interest of children and their families. PASSED by the Board on November 29 , 1977. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Information Officer Supervisors affixed this a tr.day of J. R. OLSSON, Clerk _ 1/,��_/_' a6- Z.�Z Deputy Clerk Janie L. Johnson 00303 H-24 4177 15m IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I'�. the Matter of Appeal of ) 1-1r. Rov Amador ) from action of the Board of„ ) November 29 1977 Arneals on application _ ) for Lard Use Permit 2061-77, ) Oakley area. ) NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL ) UrHEREAS on the lst day of November ., - 1977 the Board of Appeals denied Application for Land Use Permit 2061 -77 of Mr. Roy Amador for establishment of a mobile home for a member of the family- Oakley area and WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, Mr. Roy Amador filed with this Board an appeal from said action NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107 , Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday , the 27th of December 19 77 , at 11:15 a.m., and the Clerk is directed to give notice to all interested parties . November 29 1977 PASSED by the Board or. ' I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: 11r. R. Amador Witness my hand and the Seal rir. A. Amador of the Board of Supervisors affixed Director of Planning this 29t13 dad/ of November 19-7j-. -J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Ey Ronda CAmdahl Deputy Clerk 00304 r. T 03 • , t• r Gt' RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ,N'.9V IS 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. R. 0.S50N CLERK BOARD Or SUPERVISORS kONTRe OSTA CO. Deputy TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 15 November 1977 Attn: Clerk of the Board FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus+1I SUBJECT: APPEAL - Roy Amador #.12061-77, to Director of Planner , establish a mobile home for member of family, 1 Oakley Area (S.D. V) APPELLANT/APPLICANT: RoAmador, Route ;2, Box 203 - Oakley, California 94561 OANE.R: Abraham Q. Amado , 11 Amador Street, Oakley, Calif. APPELLANT REQUEST: To establish mobile home on a descriptive parcel for member of the family. PROPERTY DESC_RIPTI(XN: A descriptive parcel fronting 100-feet on the east side of Broadway, approximately 540-feet south of Cypress Road in the Oakley Area. PUBLIC ITARINGS: Zoning Administrator - tfay 23, 1977 and June 13, 1977 DENIED. Board of Appeals - July 26, 1977, August 30, 1977, September 6, 1977. DENIED at September 6th hearing. RECONSIDERATION: Requested by Applicant and granted by Board of Appeals at September 20, 1977 Study Session ?;ieeti.ng. Reconsideration hearing Tuesday, November 1, 1977. DENIAL upheld. APPEALED by applicant to Board of Supervisors (see appeal letter attached). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TI:e following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: 1Ir. Roy Amador (Appellant) 1�1r. Abraham Q. Amador (aner) Route #2, Box 203 11 Amador Street Oakley, California 94561 Oakley, California 94561 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AAD/v cc: File ;2061-RZ Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. Attachments: Resolution of Board of Appeals. Cony of Appeal Letter. Copy of Notification of Denial & Appeal time &: date. Copy of Acknowledgement of Appeal. Copy of Staff Report. Copy of Area r Iap. Copy of MLinutes. Mlcrofil mad with board order BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS CONTRA COS'T'A COUNTY - CALIFORNIA In The Matter of an APPEAL by Roy Amador #2061-77, To Establish a Mobile Home for member of family. �. WIT-REAS, on April 20, 1977, the applicant ROY AIMADOR, filed an application (Land Use Permit #2061-77) , to gain approval to establish a mobile home for a member of the family; and WHEREAS, the property is described as being a descriptive parcel fronting 100-ft. , on the east side of Broadway, approximately 540-ft., south of Cypress Road, in the Oakley area; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Zoning Administrator on May 23, 1977, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, at said May 23, 1977, public hearing, the Zoning Administrator CONTINUED said application to June 13, 1977, to allow the applicant more time to clarify a septic, tank problem with the County Health Department; and WHEREkS, at said Continued Public Hearing on June 13, 1977, the applicant was not able to present information to the effect that the septic tank problem had been clarified; and *H REAS, the Zoning Administrator DENIED the application based on the applicant's inability to obtain County Health Department approval to install adequate sewage dis- posal for the existing di,relling unit and the request mobile home; and WHEREAS, on June 23, 1977, the applicant appealed the Zoning Administrator's decis- 'ion to the Board of Appeals; and VVI-1EREAS, on September 6, 1977, the Board of Appeals reviewed the applicant's appeal and DENIED the appeal upholding the decision of the Zoning Administrator inasmuch as the applicant was unable to obtain approval from the County Health Department for the second septic tank; and UIEREAS, the applicant requested reconsideration of the Board of Appeals's denial and on Tuesday, September 20, 1977, the Board of Appeals GR4d\TM the applicant's re- quest for reconsideration and instructed the Planning Staff to list this matter for re- consideration at a subsequent meeting; and YJI-IEREAS, on Tuesday, November 1, 1977, the Board of Appeals reconsidered their previous action of September 6, 1977, and after having considered, evaluated and reviewed Microfilmed with board order Of)306 APPEAL - Roy Amador #2061-77 the previously given testimony, the reconsideration hearing testimony and evidence at hand, voted to allow their previous decision of DENIAL to stand for the following reasons: (1) The County Health Department will not approve the sanitation facilities. The foregoing order was given by the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, November 1, 1977, as follows: AYES: Commissioners - Young, Milano, Walton, Compaglia, Phillips, Stoddard, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: - Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. DONALD E. ANDERSON Chairman of t e Planning Commission o e County of Contra Costa, State of California r DATE: 1S November 1977 ATTEST: (�;nt"r n De e -s., Director o arming C Esta Co r , State of 961zfornia Microfilmed with board order • Planning ias;a,A.rn>.. 19 Department Contra William L.Milano CW Pittsburg—Chairman dy Administration Buiiding,North Wing CO�'a Donath E.Anderson J.Box 951 ^O��t_ _ AlbeMors,4 —Vice Chairman titartinez.California 94553 County Albr�!7.Cnmpaglia Mart—f Anthony A.Dehaesus Director of Planning Carolyn D.Phillips Rodeo Jack Stoddard P.hone: 372-2031 Richmond- William V.Walton Pleasant Hill Andrew H.Young Alamo November 2, 1977 Mr. Roy Amador P. 0. Box 397 Oakley, California 94561 Dear Sir: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal dated Sept- ember 14, 1977, and the $50.00 appeal fee. Receipt No. G-512951 was issued you on September 15, 1977. The material relative to your appeal is being fonaarded to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors with duplicate copies to each supervisor. The Clerk of the Board will list your appeal on the Board's calendar and a time and date will be set for a public hearing on your appeal before the Board of Supervisors. ' The Clerk of the Board will notify you and all other interested parties of that time and date. Questions relative to the appeal should be .directed to the Planning Depart- ment. . Questions relative to the date and time of your appeal hearing should be directed to the Clerk- of the Board at the following telephone number: 372-2371. Should you have questions on any of the above information, do not hesitate to call either office. Very truly yours, Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Plannin By: �GZTa! T7 Gunther Boccius, Chief, AAD/GB/v Zoning Administration cc: File x2061-77 Abraham Q. .Amador (Owner) Co .t Health Department w.. y 1Yt,�lulllrte�i with board order 00308 » - -.-a A 00309 NCicrafi!med with board order i. •� w SEP ..C�"�-� tom• �. � .,G�=�• fs z'l7Zc.J`-� C Yl�/z'-L �Allv,CG�LC�C<C�2 -. --. Q, -77Z���"�? �-C%-/ice'-• ✓ --- F '�.' .. G�LLs�GLC-�I_.�/�f_ G/`+ � C�CLtiG�I/YCG�' ..Q(ZG•t.'��- -J-/z Ie4l. . &/ N7- z Ae,�Zr . i e,—1 00310 Microfilmed with board or&: i 7 i . &421/C:C- 61V"O/� azlr —' � �'C'r�'!1.% C�C/ �J1� :lJ1J C��r/ %'(�:-•' � C1 •- Ze- R �. ' ��L . � 2-e� �'`�✓r��'�., /arc-1.�.� ...._ . r �I t�l[�{ f ��'%�f`J .. C'C, •. � �- . ��LC�C��CC� 6Ll14c: Microfilmed with board order . Planning Commission Members ,ung Department Contra William L.Milbom Costa Pittsburg—Chairman ,nty Administration Building.(North Wing Costa Donald E.Anderson %Q. BOX 951 Moraga—Vice Chairman Martinez,California 94553 Count/ Albert R.Compaglia Martinez Anthony.A.Oehaesus Director of Planning Carolyn D.PhillipsRodeo Jack Stoddard Phone: 372-2031 Richmond William V.Walton Pleasant bill Andrew H.Young Alamo September 7, 1977 Mr. Roy Amador P. O. Box 397 Oakley, California 94561 Dear Sir: This letter is to inform you that on Tuesday, September 6, 1977, the Board of Appeals reviewed your land use permit to establish a mobile home for a member of the family. The Board of Appeals denied your application by a vote of 4 AYES, 1 ABSTAIN, 2 ABSEM. Ordinance Code Section 26-2.2406 states that an aggrieved party may appeal a decision of the Board of Appeals to the County Board of Supervisors for public hearing and determination. An appeal by you would require a written notice stating YOUR. REASONS for the appeal and a filing fee of $50.00 with the letter. An appeal and fee must be received by the Planning Department Office within fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of the Board of Appeal's action---in this instance by 5:00 P.M. , Wednesday, September 21, 1977. If no appeal is received within the date and time specified, the action of the Board of Appeals becomes final. Should you have questions on the above information, do not hesitate to call this office for clarification. Very truly yours, Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planning T By: lGL 1 Z Z � F1VC1'_"C 6-2 Gunther Boccius, Chief, Zoning Administration AAD/GB/v cc: File ;2061-77 Abraham Q. Amador 0031.2 ' Microfilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Molter of Approving Inspection Services Contract for Detention Facility Project, Martinez. Work Order 5269-926. The Board of Supervisors APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute an Inspection Services Contract with Mr. Robert G. Grady, 64 Collins Drive, Pleasant Hill , CA 94523, for contract documents review and construction inspection services for the County Detention Facility Project, Martinez. The contract is effective November 29, 1977, and provides for payment for services in accordance with the standard rates indicated in the contract. Maximum payment shall not exceed $15,000 without written authorization of the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Detention Facility Project Supervisors affixed this,23ttL day of_ November 19 77 cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director p County Counsel By Deputy Clerk Consultant (via P.W. ) N. Pous ot)3l_3 H-24 3/76 15m CONTRACT Special Engineering-Administrative Services Construction Supervision & Inspection 1. Special Conditions. These special conditions are incorporated below by reference: a) Public Agency: Contra Costa County b) Inspector's Name & Address: Robert G. Grady 64 Collins Drive, Pleasant Hill . CA 94523 c) Effective Date: _ November 29, 1977 d) Project's Name and Location: Detention Facility Project. Martinez California e) Rate of Compensation: 14.94 2. Si natures These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. PUBLIC ENCY INSPEC OR 8y V/U4V OT. - Public Works Director 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency (Owner) and the above-named Inspector mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. General Qualifications & Conditions. Public Agency hereby contracts with t Inspector, as one specially trained, experienced, expert and competent to perform the special engineering and administrative services of a construction supervisor and inspector, including those associated with the continuous con- struction supervision position commonly known as Clerk-of-the-Works, in con- nection with the above construction project, which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the Public Agency by architects and engineers in the design and constructiion supervision of construction pro- jects. This agreement does not preclude other employment of the Inspector if it does not interfere with the duties and hours of work required herein. 5. Term. The duration of this contract is the duration of this construction project, but either party may terminate it by giving 30 days advance written notice to the other. 6. General Duties & Instructions. The Inspector's construction supervision and inspection services include the following general duties and instructions. a. Status & Relationship with Public Agency and Architect. His independent contract relationship with the Public Agency parallels that which exists be- tween the Public Agency and the Architect; but he is subordinate to the Architect, because the Architect is responsible for the design of the project and for general supervision of its construction pursuant to the Public Agency Architect Agreement. Microfilmed with board order Formed Approved by County Counsel 1-77 0091- 14 b. Status & Relatio( ip with Contractor. He shall ; ntain a dignified but understanding rel-cionship with the workmen on the fob but he shall conduct business only through the contractor's job superintendent, and shall not give instructions directly to the Contractor's employee(s) or subcontractor(s) • and he shall immediately advise the Architect of any case where the Public Agency representatives give instructions to the Contractor's employees. c. Public Agency-Contractor Coordination. He shall effectively maintain close coordination of the Contractor's work and the owner's requirements by fre- quent, regular conferences or other suitable means, especially where projects involve alterations or modifications of or additions to an existing function- ing facility, which must be maintained as an operating unit during conduct of construction work, and therefore require special alertness to job conditions which may affect such continuing operations. He shall coordinate necessary interruptions of normal owner activities with the Public Agency and General Contractor beforehand. d. Familiarity with Contract. He shall become thoroughly familiar with all con- tract documents including specifications , drawings and addenda; and he shall supervise and check the adequacy and accuracy of required "as built" drawings prepared by the Contractor's employees (see also 7-a, below) . e. Personal Presence & Observation. He shall be personally present whenever work is being performed even on overtime, night, holiday or weekend basis when so directed) , and shall attend meetings called by the Public Agency, Contractor or Architect; and he shall make direct personal observations of work being performed by the General Contractor and subcontractor(s) for certification to Public Agency-Owner that such work is being performed in a skillful manner and in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. f. Advice & Suggestions. He shall advise Public Agency on all construction mat- ters, such as suggesting change orders or reviewing construction schedules; he shall evaluate suggestions or modifications which have been made to acco- modate on-the-job problems, and report them with recommendations to the Archi- tect; and he shall review and make recommendations to the Contractor on all pay estimates. g. Pre-Construction Review of Contract Documents. When so directed by the Public Agency, he shall perform in-depth review of the contract documents before construction begins, and make appropriate recommendations thereon to the Public Agency. 7. Sn-ccial Duties & Instructions. The Inspector's duties specially concerning the progress of the work include the following: a. General Records & Files. He shall maintain a file of, and be aware of the contents of,. the local , State, Federal , NFBU, NEPA, etc. , codes, regulations, directives , requirements, etc. , which are pertinent to this project, and are provided by the Public Agency; and he shall maintain a complete file of all drawings , specifications , contracts, change orders, directives, etc. , which _ determine work to be done by the Contractor (see also 6-d, above) . b. Diary and Reports. He shall maintain a bound daily diary, noting therein job problems , conferences and remarks; and he shall submit all reports deemed necessary by State and Federal agencies, Architect and Public Agency, which shall be timely and in sufficient detail to satisfy the purpose of the report. 0,)31.5 -2- C. 'ace-ial Records.( .,e shall maintain records of matt., ials and/or equipment ceiivered at the site, shoring manufacturers ' names, catalog, model serial nu:rber style, type, or other identifying information thereon and noting whether they: are in strict coMpliance with the olans, shop drawings and/or specifications, or are approved by the Architect. He shall certify to Pu_-lic Agency that all materials used in construction are as specified in contract documents; and, on completion and/or installation of each applicable item, he shall collect and assemble relevant information (including guarantees, certificates , i.:ainter•ance manuals, operating instructions, keying schedules , catalog numbers , vendors addresses and telephone contacts, etc_. , of naterials and/or equipment as required) ; and at the completion of the project, he shall db-liver this information to the Architect for delivery to the Public Agency. S. Pay for Services 3 Reimbursement for Expenses. a. Public Agency shall pay Inspector for these services at the above rate, for se-:i-monthly pay periods of the 1st through the 15th and 16th through the last day of the month. Payment will be made on the 10th of the month or the 25th of the month follo:•:ing the pay period if a demand billing is received by the County Public '.•torks Department on the last County working day of the period. b. ':ileage authorized by the Public Works Director or his deputy shall be re- iroursed at a rate to be mutually agreed upon from time to time reflecting actual and charging costs. 9. Insurance. Inspector shall , at no cost to Public Agency, obtain and maintain during the term hereof Conprehensive Liability Insurance, including coverage fe- c::ned and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of -.00,000 for all damages due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to an_y' per;bn, and damage to property including the loss of use thereof, arising Out of each accident or occurrence. Inspector shall furnish evidence of such coverace, naming Public Agency, its officers and employees as additional insureds, and recuiring 30 days' smitten notice of policy lapse or cancellation. 10. Enforcement and Interpretation of Contract. The Public Agency's agent for en- forcing and interpreting this Contract is the County's Public Works Director or a deputy. 11 . Adjustment of Comoensation. The rate of compensation may be adjusted by mutual consent of the parties Tor good cause sho:•:n. � 1 1-6 -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Approving Addendum 3 - Detention Facility Electrical , Martinez, California. Project No. 5269-926-(46) WHEREAS the Board approved plans and specifications for the Detention Facility Project on October 25, 1977; and WHEREAS Addendum 3 - Detention Facility Electrical , Project No. 5269-926-(46), modifying plans and specifications, has been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the Board concurs in the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the addendum be approved and issued; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the addendum to plans and specifications is hereby APPROVED. Bids for said work will continue to be received on December 1 , 1977 at the time and place specified previously. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Detention Facility Project affixed this-29th day of November 19 77 cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director By_ �h�a , Deputy Clerk County Counsel Turner Construction (via P.W.) H-24 i/;G Ism �`•�- ADDENDUM NO. 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DET14TION FACILITY DETENTION FACILITY ELEC'T'RICAL Project No. 5269-926-(46) The following information should be noted in reviewing this Addenda: 1. The Bid receipt date remains unchanged. 2. This Addendum must be acknowledged when you submit your Bid Proposal_. 3. One page attached. F L F, J. R. O[ SCN CLERK BOARD O.= SUPERVISORS ON A COSTA CO. Microfilmed with board order 0031.8 v I J 3 � H rn ' m r 7c 3 $ m D O n �• r rn 4 ;a DO N' d ul . CD v Y Z N t 0 ►-� � C - -om Ln -n -n c -onm z ~ Z > -0m -- - 0m ;aoE -•- D N -i ;0Ornxx -•imwoz - Ar ~ m -iXm -1 -i -1 o < -1 20r ---{ ;u n.-< - - CO -Df --• ;u -nO3 ►--. DOOM � O c) cn wrn r Z rn r- X v o G r I -vD -irn -< -. ODrOzc d D 2c rn r- cn rrt 2D -q rn X m -i -o cn w 0 o n C � -10 -n - OD 01 --zm - r n i O to t Z LnZ -i Z n ra ;Aj - � zxmzm > " r- - C3 --A — N = — mmm0 -1 D �o - t ' cnr- ;6cmz 2: > < -i m fn.o rn fn r 0 cn c r n d rnO t DOrn � r- -D -i = z w rnx. -00 z -icO z -icnDN — cnr -unrO � C DrrnrnC zD — cN 3 � D0A -4 � � -f0 - 0 � a rn -- 3rn � O = n — = r < fry J rOV) t7 � XO --1MM X z -i 7 C/) rr n •--• �7 w _ -i � D --lo D f�'I � rn � z �- V7 N m O C N D c r- o r-- 0 o h r rr r:r Zr z fT1 t~ Otr �t rt, Sv 1 (!I W 0 O G7 N Z Fl to kD rt- U.) - o Fl- I J rt D O Xc rn rn u) cn Z �7 G7 ;ti 0.03-1 9 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 M the Matter of Approving Addendum 2 - Detention Facility Plumbing, Martinez, California. Project No. 5269-926-(48) WHEREAS the Board approved plans and specifications for the Detention Facility Project on October 25, 1977; and WHEREAS Addendum 2, Detention Facility Plumbing, Project No. 5269-926-(48), dated November 22, 1977, modifying said plans and specifications, was filed with the Board on November 22, 1977 by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the Board concurs in the recommendation of the Public Works Director that the addendum be approved and issued; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the addendum to plans and specifications is hereby APPROVED. Bids for said work will continue to be received on December 1 , 1977 at the time .and place specified previously. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board .on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Detention Facility Project affixed this 29thday of November 19 77 cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director By /�G , Deputy Clerk County Counsel Turner Construction (via P.W.) N.POUS 003- 20 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Unemployment Insurance The Board having this day considered the recommendation of the Director of Personnel that it adopt a resolution indicating its intent to participate in the County Supervisors Association of California cooperative program for administration of unemployment insurance effective January 1, 1978; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is REFERRED to its Finance Committee (Supervisors R. I. Schroder and J. P. Kenny) for report on December S , 1977. PASSED by the Board on November 29 , 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc• Board Committee Director of Personnel Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 2 9th day of NovemheT+ 19T7 County Auditor-Controller County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk M4zsf Crai H-24 4/77 15m Contra _ Contra Costa County Costa CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT RECEIVED cufty Administration Building NOV - 8 1977 (Martinez, California Office of County Administrator, Date: November 8, 1977 T0: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator EI " ED . RE 1"R011I: Charles J. Leonard, Director of Personnelt�� • rlov�.y 1977 SUBJECT: Unemployment InsuranceOLSSON 1. R' OF SUPERVISORS uERK BOARD STA CO. De U Ini •,CONTRA :r. Effective January 1, 1978, but subject to action by the State Legislature, the unemployment insurance program will apply to public employees in the State of California. Attached is a report from Howard Brownson, County Safety Officer, pointing out the options available to Contra Costa County for the purpose of adminis- tering the program when it becomes effective. In my opinion, Contra Costa County would be best served by joining the total program to be administered by the County Supervisors Association of California. This would include the provision of consulting services from the firm of Reed & Roberts and the joining of the CSAAC special fund for purposes of providing a pool of money to pay unemployment insurance costs. Mr: Brownson's report discusses several alternatives including a rather comprehensive discussion of the CSAAC program. It is recommended that the matter be placed on the agenda of the Board of Supervisors for its early con- sideration with a recommendation that the attached resolution of intent to join the CSAAC program be adopted. I might add that at a recent meeting of the County Personnel Administrators' it was the concensus that the CSAAC plan offered the most reasonable and responsible means of meeting the cost and the administrative fiscal require- ments of the unemployment insurance program. CJL:mg A ttach. 00322 Microfilmed with board order AK 63 CONTRA COSTA COUMN iINIDIPLOY Eff INSUIMCE PROGRAM RECONINE DATION Background Unemployment Insurance is coming to local government on January 1, 1978. Public Law 94-566 requires all states to enact enabling legislation by then. California has not passed such legislation yet._ Our County has joined the National Institute of i itnicipal Law Officers (INIMLO) in fighting the constitutionality of the federal law. We should make contingency plans for handling unemployment insurance for our employees in case this fight is unsuccessful. To prepare for employment insurance there _are three areas where administrative decisions and procedures must be made: 1. Funding 2. Claims administration 3. Personnel practices There are several funding options available. One is to pay a payroll tax of 3.65 of wages (up to $7,000 per employee) to the Employment Development Department as a "contributory tax". This is by far the most expensive option. Other options are all modifications of a reimbursement funding. - That means that benefits paid out by E.D.D. are charged back to the County directly, or too-a fund in which the County participates. The County Supervisor Association of California has designed such a fund.just for counties. By paying an estimated payroll tax of -5% of gross salaries into this fiord the County would probably have enough money put aside to take care of claims. In this fund various employers do not share risk; each employer has its own account. The federal government will pay all benefits until August 1978. Thereafter the County runt operate within one of the funding options. In the matter of claims administration there is a need to watch the claims filed by former employees in order to stop unfair claims from being made and to make ,Lire that employees get proper benefits. The choice here of procedures is basi- tally between self-administration, using County staff to perform this policing function, or contract claims adjustors who would take care of this function for the County. Again, C.S.A.C. has contracted with a claim adjusting company, Reed Roberts Associates, to provide such services to any county which wants to join the C.S.A.C. group. These services are provided for a fee which is dependent on the number of employees. The fee will be between $1.80 and $2 per employee per year for these services depending on how man; counties participate. There is also the possibility of contracting as an individual employer with any of the several firms like Reed Roberts who do claims adjusting work. We have found none with as low a price as the C.S.A.C. group. In tine matter of personnel procedures and practices, we will have to loot: carefully at separation procedures in order to clarify our understanding of how people are terminated, so that unernloyncnt insurance claims can be justly a(hinistered. We shall need good documentation of termination interviews, classifications of reasons for terminations, and an understanding by all managers and supervisors of the basic rules for unemployment insurance claims. Likewise, we shall have to look carefully at personnel practices whic l may cause undue nuu�ers of uncuployrrent insurance 1 ) 2 . 1� )tlF-rV 2 claiias, such as the use of temporary and`per.,wicnt intermittent employees. Assis- tance in development of such procedures can be obtained from claim adjusting contrac- tors such.as Reed Roberts Associates. The C.S.A.C. contract with Reed Roberts includes the setting up of such services for member counties. It is included in the fee i.^.entioned above. Recorzaeadation Following is a recor,�ended plan for Contra Costa County: Contingency Plan Financing and Administration of Unemployment Insurance • 1. The County of Contra Costa, as the first priority, would become a member of the C.S.A.C. Special Fund. C.S.A.C. has retained the firm Reed Roberts and Associates to provide training and administrative services to County participants, and it is estimated these administrative costs will be appro_;imately $7,800 for the period from January 1, 1978 to June 30, 1978 and approximately $13,000 per year thereafter (see Exhibit I). This cost is considerably less than hiring personnel to administer the program internally. Under the C.S.A.C. plan each county would contribute to the fund for the first tiao or three years a percentage of gross wages paid by the county. Discussions have centered around 0.5; of gross payroll. After 2 to 3 years, each entity would be experience rated. The result would be a sharing of finds, but no sharing of risk. Interest earned by any excess funds would accrue in individual county accounts. At the rate of 0.5% of payroll, Contra Costa County's contri- bution 1•rould be approxi,-nately $500,000 per year until experience ratable. Spe- cial districts governed by the County Board of Supervisors can be included in the County's account. 2. Should C.S.A.C. not provide a progr ~;, the County of Contra Costa would elect to be an individual cost reimburser as the second priority in the selection of a financing method. To handle unforeseen contingencies under this option it is recommended that budgeting for fiscal year 1978/79 be at 0.70 of gross payroll to provide pay- ment of benefits, claims administration and a contingency reserve. The esti- mated cost for this option for that year is $700,000. If individual rei,-�bursenent is the funding option it is recommended that claims administration be contracted out to one of several firms *ho provide such service to employers. 3. Should the memiployment insurance not be required of Contra Costa County as the result of: a. A Court order staying or nullifying the- Federal law, or b. Failure of the California Legislature to pass enabling legislation, then, no program for unenployment insurance would be implemented by Contra Costa County. 00324 Exhibit I UMVLOYI•EJi T LNS'JR NCE FEES C.S.A.C.--REED & ROBEIUS PROGRAM Contra Costa County and Fire Districts Estimated 6,000 Employees (Full-time equivalent) Fee Amiount Date Due Program De-relopment Fee to $ 1,500 When contract is signed C.S.A.C., .one time only ,(0 $.25 per employee) _ (December 177) Adjusting Services from $ 6,000 $3,000 on 4-1-78 1-1-78 to 7-1-78 to Reed, . (@ -$1.00 per employee) $3,000 on 7-1-78 Roberts & Associates Initial Administration Fee to $300 When contract is signed C.S.A.C. Fund, one time only (January 1978) Adjusting services after $12,000 $39000 quarterly 7-1-78 to Peed, Roberts F $2.00 per eriployee) starting 10-1-73 Associates Continuing Administration fee rate per employee Semi-annually starting to C.S.A.C. Fund not lmown January 1, 1979 C.S.A.C. Special Fund $500,000 per year Quarterly, Estimated Estimated 0.50 $125,000 per quarter of gross payroll starting 8-1-78 0 i � I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of WIN Child Care Contract #20-026-3 with YWCA of Contra Costa County IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute contract #20-026-3 with the Young Women's Christian Association of Contra Costa County (YT?CA) for the provision of child day care services from July 1, 1977 through June 30, 1978 under Title IV-A and IV-C of the Federal Social Security Act, as amended, for the children of AFDC recipients enrolled in Work Incentive (WIN) training programs, with a payment limit of $8,500, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator County Auditor/Cont rollerafxed this 29thday of Noveriber 19= County Welfare Director Contractor J. OLSSON, Clerk By Geraldine Russell . Deputy Clerk SD:sh H-24 4/77 15m Contra ;,cst�a COU3t`j Standard Form 40 STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. C-)-arae~ Identification. Number 2 Q - 0 26 2 Daoartm-nt: Social Service Sub.;zct : Day Care Services for children of AFDC recipients enrolled in :2IN Training Programs (Title IV-C) 2. Far_ es. The County of Contra Costa California (County) , for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Co-a ractor: YOLT\G WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY C=paciry: Nonprofit California corporation :_3cress: 3230 Macdonald Avenue, Richmond, California 94804 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is July 1, 1977 and it terminates June 30, 1975 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. PavLent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S 8,500 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Pay=ent Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work: described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reverence: California State Annual Statewide Social Services Plan for Fiscal Year 1977-78, and any revisions or modifications thereof. 9. Legal authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703; Titles IV-A, IV-C, and S_{ of the Federal Social Security Act, as amended (P.L. 96-647) ; 45 CFR Chapter II, Parts 220 and 228; 42 USCA Sections 630ff and 1397ff. 10. Signatures. The signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: P CO N uF ./10 R , C3�LJ/IFORNI / CONTRACTOR ZZ Chairman, Board of Supervi rs.,' .SCJ 4•-,_Gee_ / L Z_G Zell z..� (Designate official capacity in businens Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clark and affix corporation seal) State of California ) ss. By � County of Contra Costa ) Deputy AMOI&EDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recormended by Department known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By ;W,/r-,-they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws HRA Contracts Administrator or a resolution of its board of directors. Form . 7,pro':ed ) Dated: � (,�'���,�}�!/�- a2/ , /�7 By Designee /Deputy Co y Clerk (3-4617 REV 6/76) 0032 1 • Contra Costa County Standard Form PMMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 2 © ` 026 2 1. Pavment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to the Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor: [Check one alternative only. ] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [X] b. $1.28 & $1.53 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ].c. An amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] [X] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular RIC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost) , and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or j ] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allowable costs. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 2. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Euuounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. 00 328 (A-4618 REV 6/76) -1- �, .:gra :ust.� Coun�y Standard Form PA-i7MEINT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Con ractor , in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the C_n_ractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to urnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its pr.::-ran, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the ter--ination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the for= required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred b_: Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowably_ costs tar- have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments m=de by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any suc- excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (?G=ment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to Cour ty. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan sn be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later t mn. 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that tae payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the a_lcwable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, i-c_uding any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) . a:--,-:e, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any suci: excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually ba?n incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County p_rsuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments mada pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. S. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) alo-:e, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or co=plying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit a.,:!, ncies occurring as EL result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also algre,es to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. (l�)jr)9 (:_-4618 REV 6/76) -2- _A • SERVICE PLAN . C Number 11 — 012 i? 2 1. Service. YWCy OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (Contractor) shall provide Countv with certain child day care services, defined as the provision of direct care, protection, supervision, and developmental experiences to an eligible child outside the child' s own home in a State licensed, approved, or certified day care _3ziiity, for some portion of a day, but less than 18 hours, for the period of the erent's enrollment in a WIN (Work Incentive) training program. For purposes of _eterminin:- the number of days counted for each eligible child enrolled under this CDntract, verified absence on account of illness or quarantine will be considered t� be regular attendance. Contractor's day care program shall include the following services for each child: a. Obtaining dental and medical evaluations upon entering day care and at re>ular intervals; b. assistance in arranging medical and dental care and treatment; c. Evaluation of nutritional, health, growth, and developmental needs; d. Continuing assessment of social and psychological adjustment; e. Meals prepared with nutritional consultation; f. Educational development activities; and C, Referral to appropriate community agencies providing needed services. 2. Specifications. Contractor shall provide day care services under this Contract for up to 15 children at any one time who are between 1 and 14 years of age, five days a week from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. at its day care center facilities located as follows: a. Richmond Extended Day Care Center b. West Pittsburg Child Development Center 3230 Miacdcnald Avenue, Richmond 3105 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg. 3. Staffing. Contractor shall employ staff to provide services hereunder as follows: M:HBER POSITION JOB DESCRIPTION 2 Director Responsible for overall Day Care Center operations and directing staff in providing care for children in a manner that contributes to their growth and development. 2 Head Teacher Responsible for all scheduling of programs, supervision of all teachers, staff training, and checking lesson plans. Supervised by Director. 6 Classroom Teachers Responsible for the planning and conducting of the daily program of child care. Supervised by Head Teacher. 2 Secretary Handles all clerical work. 2 Cook Requests food and supplies. Prepares food. 1 Comunity Aide Responsible for disseminating information in the community about the Day Care Center as well as encouraging community support. In addition, works with parents on an individual basis on special projects, as attendance, etc. 1 Nurse Arranges for health services to enrollees, as dental screening. Establishes procedures for administering necessary medicines. Supervises health controls. Relates to parents on health matters. 12 Teacher Aide Assists the teacher in the classroom. Supervised by teacher. 1 Van Driver Transports children from school to Day Care Center. ce above staffing description includes all positions, both full and part-time, for to day care center facilities identified above. Each staff person works under this Contract approximately 4.2% of total time. Initials: / •�\L ContractorC /nZtyDept. -1- OU1;3U • SERVICE PLAN Number-2 0 — 021, 6, •J 4. Regulations and Standards. Pursuant to Paragraph 9. (Legal Authority) of :his Contract, Contractor agrees to operate and maintain a professionally supervised care program for children and to provide services in accordance with all applicable Coln:;, State, and Fed:sral regulations and standards, as may be revised or amended, _-:eluding but not limited to: a. The Federal Interagency Day Care Requirements, pursuant to Section 522(d) of the Economic Opportunity Act, as approved by the U. S. Department of Health, -z-,-cation, and Welfare, U. S. Office of Economic Opportunity, and U. S. Department 3f Labor; b. California Administrative Code, Title 2, Division 2, Chapter 4; c. California Education Code Sections 16701 and 16705; and d. State of California Annual Statewide Social Services Plan, Title XX, ?,• i, 1977 - June 30, 1978, with respect to Child Day Care Services. 5. Eligibility. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract only for e dldren who meet all of the following eligibility requirements: a. Are certified as eligible for such services by the County's Social Service Department; b. Are current recipients of Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC); and c. Have parents enrolled and participating in a WIN (Work Incentive) training program. Children who do not have a parent enrolled in a WIN training program are ineligible X or services under this Contract. County will provide Contractor with written certification verifying the eligibility of each child for services hereunder. 5. Attendance Records. Contractor shall maintain daily attendance records, zhowing the daily attendance, including excused and unexcused absences, of each child served under this Contract. 7. Grievance Procedure. Contractor shall advise persons receiving services 111"er this Contract who are dissatisfied with any action taken by Contractor of Zneir right to present grievances with respect to the provision of services hereunder ad Contractor shall develop a fair hearing system whereby such persons may present grievances. 8. Program and Budget. Contractor acknowledges and certifies that its overall Aay care program is operated in part under an agreement with the California State Department of Education (pursuant to Titles IV-A and XX of the Federal Social Security e t) and that the day care services provided to children under the within Contract (pursuant to Title IV-C of the Federal Social Security Act) shall in no way differ from the day care services provided to children under the aforesaid agreement with the State Department of Education. Contractor agrees to notify County should said agreement with the State Department of Education cease to be effective during :_' 1977-78. County understands that the services provided under the within Contract are only a small fraction of Contractor's overall day care program. Contractor certifies and attests that its overall 12-month day care program for FY 1977-78 is funded as follows: Total Budget % of Revenue Reimbursement Total County WIN Contract (#20-026-3) $ 8,500 4.2 State Department of Education Agreement 14231716 70.8 CETA 30,010 14.9 Food 10,636 5.3 WIN Salary Reimbursement 1,955 1.0 Parent fees 5,300 2.6 Ways and Paeans 2,500 1.2 TOTAL $ 201,617 100% Contractor shall operate said program in accordance with the "Fiscal Year 1977-78 Da-: Care and WIN Child Hour Budget," attached hereto, which is incorporated herein D•: reference. Initials: Aorctor nt D SERVICE PLAN Number 0 •� 9. Unit Pa«ent Rate. In accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) , page 1, of the ?ayment Provisions, one unit for payment purposes shall be defined as the provision of day care services as specified herein for one eligible child for at least one full hoer during a calendar day and shall be paid at the rate of $1.28 per hour per child for children two years of age or older and $1.53 per hour per child for children under two years of age, subject to later adjustment to the actual allowable cost of said services in accordance with Paragraph 3. (Allowable Costs), page 1, and Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement), page 2, of the Payment Provisions and with Paragraph 10. (Unit Rate Payment Limit), page 3, of this Service Plan. 10. Unit Rate Payment Limit. County's total payment to Contractor under this Contract, pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) and Paragraph 7. (Audits), page 2, of the Payment Provisions, shall in no event exceed the fixed unit payment rates specified above or the allowable costs that have actually been incurred, whichever is less. 11. Audit. Contractor shall provide County with a copy of its regular annual audit which it provides to the State Department of Education in connection with the aforesaid agreement with the State Department of Education; said audit shall verify Contractor's cost report submitted under Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement), page 2, of the Payment Provisions. 12. Conformity with Federal Cost Regulations. In accordance with and subject to Paragraph 3. (Allowable Costs), page 1, of the Payment Provisions, the allowability of Contractor's costs shall be determined in accordance with the cost principles set forth in "A Guide for Non-Profit Institutions (Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare)," as issued by the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Assistant Secretary, Comptroller, James B. Cardwell (58 pages). 13. Source of Funds. This Contract is funded under Title IV-C of the Social Security Act by a combination of County money (3.25X), State money (6.75X), and federal social services funds (90X) allocated to the County by the State of California. The County provides a local matching share for contract costs and receives reimbursement for the state and federal shares from the State as follows: County matching funds (3.25X) $ 276 State funds (6.75X) 574 Federal funds (90X) 7,650 TOTAL (Payment Limit) $ 82500 County guarantees that the County share of funding for this Contract does not consist of Federal funds. 14. Preference in Training and Employment. Contractor shall give preference in employment and training to public assistance recipients, when appropriate and required by applicable State or Federal laws or regulations. /0 Initials: 111. tractory nt Dept. -3- 0033211 • FISCAL YEAR 1977-73 DAY CARE AND WIN CHILD HOUR BUDGET Number 2 0 CERTIFICATED SALARIES 1000 77-78 BUDGET 1100 Teacher Salaries $ 39,401 1300 Supervisors Salaries 21,256 1500 Physical and Mental Health Salaries 2,208 1800 Others and Administrative Personnel 6,552 Total 1000 Category $ 69,417 2100 Instructional Aides $ 49,161 2300 Clerical and Office Personnel 20,112 2500 Food Service Personnel 6,264 2600 Transportation Personnel 431073 2900 Other Classified Salaries -0- Total 2000 Category $ 79,610 EMPLOYEES BENEFITS 3000 3300 FICA and Health Insurance $ 163,750 3510 Unemployment Ins. Instructional Aides 1,475 3520 Unemployment Ins. All other Employees 2,996 3600 Workman's Compensation 5,960 3900 Other Benefits -0- Total 3000 Category $ 27 181 BOOKS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4000 4200 Other Books $ 75 4300 Instructional Supplies 2,100 4500 Other Supplies 1,375 4710 Food 6,700 4790 Other Food Expense 250 Total 4000 Category $ 10,500 CONTRACTED SERVICES AND OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES 5000 5100 Contracts for Personal Services $ 2,700 5200 Travel, Conference and Other 4,300 5420 Liability Insurance 705 5500 Utilities and Housekeeping Service 4,104 5600 Contracts, Rent & Leases 1,800 5700 Legal, Election and Audit Expense 1,300 Total 5000 Category $ 14,909 6490 Equipment $ -0- Total 6000 Category $ -0- GRAND TOTAL $2013,617 Initials- •y Contractor --CoVnty Dept. Contra Costa County • • Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisionh or the Service Plan. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -1- Contra Costa County Standard Form • GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. 0033 (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- Contra Costa County • • Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without. notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 13-4 (A-4616 REV 6/76) -1- Contra Costa County Standard Form GENTERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616 REV 6176) -2- Pontra Costa County ! . Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees "a Owialy-r-+e9l 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. 00336 (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 19 77 In the Matter of Official Statement of Votes Cast for Maximum Tax Rate for Zone No. 1, Byron Fire Protection' District. j The County Clerk having presented to the Board the official statement (canvass) of votes cast November 8, 1977 for the Maximufn Tax Rate for Zone No. 1, Byron Fire Protection District, which measure carried; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of same is ACKNOVILEDGED. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Clerk Supervisors Elections Dept. affixed this_.? ygtl-daof- November 19 77 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Cleric R6bbie. �Utierrez/f t'13 H-24 3/76 15m CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK TO RESULT OF THE CANVASS OF BYRON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ZONE NO. 1, FORMATION MEASURE B ELECTION State of California ) ( ss. County of Contra Costa ) I, JAMES R. OLSSON, County Clerk of said County, do hereby certify that I did canvass the returns of the vote cast at the Dis- trict Formation Election held on November 8, 1977, for Formation Measure B submitted to the vote of the voters, and that the State- ment of the Vote Cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast and the whole number of votes cast for and against the measure in said District and in each of the re- spective precincts therein, and that the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct. WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this 15th day of November, 1977. \•� ; JAMES R. OLSSON, County Clerk (SEAL) , Deputy County Clerk t . RECEIVED Nov lq 1977 J. OLS,LON X80 OF SunKDUtf R5 Mic;o::'m�:: �•::}h beard Order e' Ir STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST BYRON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ZONE NO. 1 MAXIMUM TAX RATE ELECTION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 1977 Special Votes Precinct Cast For . Against Absentees 8 7 1 142 57 53 4 Total 65 60 5 00 339 Mitro:j1jrnad woord order IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFOPIVIA In the Matter of Report of the ) Planning Co*nission on the Request ) of Jay-Henman, Applicant, (2138-RZ) ) to Rezone Land in the Pacheco Area ) November 29, 1977 and Development Plan•Application ) No. 3053-77. ) ) Beverly Jean Catalina, Owner. ) The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission reconmends approval of the request of Jay Henman, applicant, (2138-P.Z) to rezone 1.02 acres fronting approximately 159 feet on the north side of Second Avenue, 504.04 feet west of Elder Drive, Pacheco area, from Single Family Residen- tial District-7 (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-4) , and in connection therewith, also recommends approval of the development plan, application No. 3053-77, with conditions; IT IS BY THE BOARD OP.DERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 27, 1977 at 11 :30 a.m. , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, County Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets , Martinez, California. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk, pursuant to code requirements, publish notice of same in the MARTINEZ NETTIS GAZETTE and give notice by mail to all persons shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the proposed zoning change. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November, 1977. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By�lClil7ZC,P Jamie L. Johnson, Deputy Clerk cc: Jay Henman Beverley Jean Catalina List of Names Provided by Planning Director of Planning OW340 RECEIVED !/ Ar- P . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY NOV/F 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ J. R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF .St:PERVISORS nCONT STA CO. g4 ., De puty TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 16 November 1977 Attn: Clerk of the Board FROM: Anthony A. Dehae SUBJECT: REZONING & DEVEZAPI�ENT PIAN. Directoi-of P Jay Herman (Applicant) - B. J. Catalina (Owner) 2138-RZ & #3053-77 - Pacheco Area. Attached is Planning 4Resolution No. 89-1977, adopted by the Planning Carm- ission on Tuesday, 15 1 embex 1977, by unanimous vote (all members present) . This resolution also incorporates the approval of Development Plan application #3053- 77. Both applications were reviewed by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 8, 1977, and were approved by the Commission by a vote of 6 AYES - 1 ABSErTr (Milano) . The applicant is requesting to rezone 1.02 acres from Single Family Residential Dis- trict (R-7) to Ybltiple Family Residential District (M-4). The development plan application cgs approved for a 12 unit. apartment complex with 3-ft. , rearyard variance (10-ft., required) and 10-ft., frontyard variance (20-ft., requ red) . The property is described as being 1.02 acres fronting approximately 159-ft. , on the north side of Second Avenue, 504.04-ft., west of Elder Drive, in the Pacheco Area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Jay Herrman (Applicant) Robert J. Costa 5205 Clayton Road 1753 Concord Avenue Concord, Calif. 94520 Concord, California 94520 Beverley Jean Catalina ((Xwner) Robert F. Vasques 115 Flame Drive 111 Flame Drive Pacheco, California 94553 Pacheco, California 94553 AAD/v Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Neg.EIR, Staff Report, Minutes. cc: File: 2138-RZ & W3053-77 Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. 01341 Microrm-ned wan courd order RESOLUTION NO. 89-1977 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COb1MISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOM�4iENDATIONS.ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE BY JAY HENMAN (APPLICANT) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (OWNER) (2138-RZ) , IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE PACHECO AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by JAY HENMAN (Applicant) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (Applicant) (2138-RZ) , to rezone land in the Pacheco area from Single Family Residential District (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District(M-41 and also in conjunction Final Development Plan JAY HENMAN (Applicant) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (Owner) (3053-77), and which indicated for site plan approval for for multiple family group development and to have three story units, to be utilized for multiple residential proposed under this application, was received by the Planning Department Office on May 26, 1977 and September 14, 1977; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was _posted on September 1, 1977; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof was lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 8, 1977; and WHEREAS, the Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that the rezoning request of JAY HENMAN (Applicant) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (Owner) (2138-RZ), be APPROVED for change from Single Family Residential (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-4), and that this zoning change be made as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A Portion of the Districts Map For The Pacheco Area Insert Map No. 46, Contra Costa County, California and furthermore the Final Development Plan request of JAY HENMEN (Applicant) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (Owner) (3053-77) be APPROVID with conditions (Exhibit A attached) ; and 003- 42 Microfilmed with board ordf. RESOLUTION NO. 89-1977 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this •reccommendation is as follows: (1) The Proposed rezoning is in conformance with the General Plan. (2) Is consistent with the pattern of development of surrounding areas. (3) The development plan submitted reflects a proper transition, in terms of density and design. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Commission shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, November 8, 1977, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Compaglia, Stoddard, Phillips, Young, Walton, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - Milano. -ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Donald E. Anderson, Chairman of the Planning Commission of, the' County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing - was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 15, 1977, and this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission. -003- 43 -2- Microfilmed with board a RESOLUTION NO. 89-2977 AYES: Commissioners - Compagli.a, I-Elam, Walton, Yaa%, Phillips, Stoddard, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. LMI-rman of the Planning Commistion County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: SecretaryKntra the Planning Commiss- n of the C antyG of Costa, State of California J• RECEIVED N 0 V /f 1977 J. R. OtSSON CLERK BOARD Or SUPERVISORS B A COSTA CO. ON __oeoutr 00344 -3- hticroi►+med with board order J. Henman 3053-77 EXHIBIT 'A' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Approval is granted per elevations submitted September 14,' 1977 and revised plot plan submitted October 12, 1977. 2. The applicant shall submit a landscaping plan and cost estimate for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. If occupancy is requested prior in installation of the landscape improve- ments, then either: a) a cash bond; b) a bond; or c) a letter of credit; shall be delivered to the County for 100% of the estimated cost of the uncompleted portion of thelandscape and irrigation improvements. If compliance is not achieved after six months of occupancy, as determined by the County Zoning Administrator, the County shall contract for the completion of the landscaping and irrigation improvements to be paid for by the held sum. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, elevations and architectural design of the buildings shall be submitted for final review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. 5. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District as follows: provide one 'fire hydrant of the East Bay type behind curb line at the northeast corner of Flame Drive and Second Avenue. The hydrant and main system is to be capable of producing a required fire flow of 1,000 GPM while maintaining 20 pounds residual pressure in the main. 6. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department as follows: A. Convey to the County by Offer of Dedication 7 feet of additional right-of-way on Flame Drive as required for the planned future width of 60 feet. In accordance with Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be conveyed to Contra Costa County shall consent to the conveyance of those areas. The above instrument/s, which must be executed by the owner/s before any building permit can be issued, will be prepared by the Public Works Department, Land Development Division. B. Surface water originating on the subject property shall not be discharged .in a concentrated manner onto adjacent land. 00345 Microfilmed with board order J. Henan 3053-77 -2- C. Submit site grading and drainage plans to the Public Works Department Land Development Division for review prior to the issuance of any building permit or the construction of site improvements. D. Construct curb, 4-foot 6-inch sidewalk (width measured from curb face) . necessary longitudinal drainage, and pavement widening on Flame Drive and Second Avenue. The face of the curb shall be located 10 feet r from the right-of-way line. E. Collect all storm water flows entering and originating within the subject property and convey them in an adequate drainage facility to the existing storm drain at facilities at Flame Drive and/or Second Avenue. F. Building site pad elevations shall be at least one foot above the highest top of curb elevation on Second Avenue adjacent to the property. G. Install all new utility distribution services underground Submit improvement plans to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division for review; pay an inspection fee and applicable lighting and fire hydrant fees. The improvement plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division prior •to the issuance of any Building Permit. The review of improvement plans and the payment of all fees shall be completed prior to the clearance of any building for occupancy by the Public Works Department. If occupancy is requested prior to construction of improvements, the applicant shall execute a Road Improvement Agreement with Contra Costa County and post the bonds required by the Agreement to guarantee completion of the work. H. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Publc Works Department Land Development Division,for driveway connections within the right- of-way of Flame Drive and Second Avenue. An inspection fee, in the amount of 5% of the estimated construction cost shall be paid prior to the issuance of the encroachment permit. 7. The sideyard variance (10' requested 17' required in the M-4 District) are approved. 8. Off-street parking areas shall be surfaced with an asphaltic or Portland cement binder pavement, or similar material, so as to provide a durable and dustless surface, and shall be so graded and drained as to prevent the ponding of water. 9. Light standards for the parking area shall be low lying. All exterior lights shall be deflected to shine on applicant's property and not toward adjacent properties. OW346 h::c:oftilmed wlrh board order + + r'v ' I I I I ! # 1 1 R-7 I C ! T Y R7 Rezone OF � � f" � I IiI FromTo�t� MAR 7 I N E Z 1 C i T Y . OF t PLEASANT r � Hit� L 177r 171• � 1 { I � 1 � I 1 R_10 1 1I ii 11 3 = 800 I, Q NAS E---A &SQM Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A P6wria% OV ML T m Co txrA.�.C�sZA Cay ts��.,►�Q��i. indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of T ,4y�cNM�� airman of the Contra Cas County Planning Commission, State of Calif. ATT T: Se a ry of te ontra Costa County PI nnin Com ission, State of Calif. Findings Map Microfilmed with board order CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2031 Phone EIR Contact Person Margaret Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: JAY HENMAN (APPLICANT) BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (OWNER) COUNTY FILE 2138-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone 1.75 acres on the northeast intersec- • tion of Second Ave. & Flame Drive, from R-7 to M-3 in the Pacheco area. The Project Will Not Have A Significant Effect On The Environment The project conforms to the General Plan and zoning regulations.-.The property is subject to a high liquefaction potential and adverse soil characteristics. However, these problems may be mitigated with appropriate construction methods. The project may have significant growth-inducing potential, as the project is the first multiple rezoning request in this single family residential neighborhood since the 1975 Vine Hill-Pacheco General Plan Amendment was adopted. The project site has been considered for purchase and use as neighborhood park by the Pacheco Town Council; however, adequate funds were not realized. A park site may be available elsewhere in the vicinity. It is determined from initial study by Margaret Coulter of the XXX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets Martinez, California Da. e Post d 3Ck'a.— Final date for review/appeal 1-6 v3TTI By Planning Departme epresentative 0034.8 with board order CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TWINNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XX egative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County ; c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2031 Phone EIR Contact Person Margaret Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: JAY HENMAN (Applicant) - BEVERLY JEAN CATALINA (Owner), County File #3053-77: The applicant requests develop- ment pan approval for a 12 unit apartment complex. Subject property is described as follows: A descriptive parcel fronting approximately 259 feet on the north side of Second Avenue, 505.04 feet west of Elder Drive, in the Pacheco area. (R-7) (CT 3212) (Parcel #125-080-010) The Project Will Not Have A Significant Effect On The Environment The Project conforms to the General Plan and Zoning Regulations. The property is subject to a high liquefaction potential and adverse soil characteristics. However, these problems may be mitigated with appropriate construction methods. The project may have significant growth-inducing potential, as the project is the first multiple rezoning request -in this single family residential neighborhood since the 1975 Vine Hill-Pacheco General Plan Amendment was adopted. The project site has been considered for purchase and use as neighborhood park by the Pacheco Town Council; however, adequate funds were not realized. A park site may be available elsewhere in the vicinity. It is determined from initial study by Margaret Coulter of the XX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine $ Escobar Streets 2 Martinez, California _ ff Da a Po ted 3 l9`�`� Final date for review/appeal — P anning Dep n Representative 003- 49 Microfilmed with board. order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29, , 19 77 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Instruments for Recording Only r, r` rn IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Offers of Dedication are ACCEPTED for RECORDING only: Instrument Date Grantor Reference L7 v 1 . Offer of Dedication 11/16/77 Blackhawk for Drainage Purposes Development Co. Sub 4963 2. Offer of Dedication 0' for Roadway Purposes 11/11/77 Frank's Marina, Inc LUP 2197-75 L L 3. Offer of Dedication o for Roadway Slope Easement 8/29/77 Tony Cutino, et al Sub 4922 0 i-°•.. 4. Offer of Dedication for Roadway Slope Easement 8/29/77 Tony Cutibo, et al (second document) Sub 4922 5. Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes 11/17/77 John Papini , et al Sub MS 163-75 6. Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes 11/18/77 Ernest R. Lasell , Jr. , et al Sub MS 27-77 PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 29, 1977 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November . 19 77 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By /3 Deputy Clerk cc: Recorder (via P. W.) N.POUS Public Works Director Director of Planning H-24 4/77 75m 00150 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29, , 1977 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Instruments r� rn IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following instruments are ACCEPTED: .o CID o Instrument Date Grantor Reference . z Y 1 . Grant Deed 11/17/77 John Papini, et al Sub MS 163-75 L 0 2. Relinquishment of Q Abutters Rights 11/T7/77 John Papini, et al Sub MS 163-75 a- co L C) L 0 0 N O PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date afore%=d. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of Ndyember 19.72 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Originating Department: Public Works N.POUs Land Development Division cc: Recorder (via P. W.) Public Works Director g.i),11771 Director of Planning H-24417715m IN THE BOARD OF SUPEPVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of the Planning ) Commission on the Request of T;ayne Schlosser, ) Applicant, (2133-RZ) to Rezone Land in the ) November 29, 1977 *Danville Area and Development Plan No. 3017-77, ) B. Rajko-,ski, Applicant. ) G & S Development, OT.aner ) The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the request of Wayne Schlosser, applicant, (2133-RZ) to rezone two acres, more or less, fronting approximately 556 feet on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet south of 'Midland Way, also fronting at the eastern terminus of. 1•7embly Drive, Danville area, fron Single Familv Residential District-15 (R-15) to Multiple Family Residential District (11I-4) , and in connection therewith, also recommends approval of the development plan, Application' No. 3017-77, with conditions; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 27, 1977 at 11:35 a.m. , in the Board Chambers , Room 107, County Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk, pursuant to code requirements, publish notice of same in THE VALLEY PIONEER and give notice by mail to all persons shown on the last equalized assessment roll as owning real property within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the proposed zoning change. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I HEREBY CERTIFY. that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 29th day of November, 1977. J. R. OLSSON, CLERIC By �'r/Gt/JG/ Or 'r�iit. r} Jamie L. Johnson, Deputy Clerk cc: 17ayne Schlosser B. Rajkovski G & S Development List of Names Provided by Planning ��D 52 RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY N O V -V 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I R. OISSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERWSOn L_ZONTR CA TA CO: Moputy TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: November 16, 1977 Attn: Clerk of theBoard I - FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu ` SUBJECT: REZONING & DEVELOPMENT PLAN Director of P1 Wayne Schlosser #2133-RZ - B. Rajkovski #3017-77 - Danville Area. J Attached is San Ramon Va ey Area Planning Commission Resolution No. 84-1977 (SR) adopted by the San Ramon alley Area Planning Commission on Wednesday, October 26, 1977, by unanimous vote (all members present). This resolution also incorporates the approval of Development Plan application #3017-77. Both applications were reviewed by the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission on Wednesday, October 12, 1977 and were approved by the Commission by a vote of 5 AYES - 2 NOES. The applicant is requesting to rezone 2.36 acres from Single Family Residential District (R-15) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-4). The development plan application was approved for multiple family group development (site plan #1) and to have three story units. The property is described as being two acres, more or less, of a three acre parcel fronting approximately 556 feet on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet south of Midland Way, also fronting at the eastern terminus of Wembly Drive, in the Danville area. The following people should be notified on your Board's hearing date and time: Wayne Schlosser (Applicant & Owner) Bruce Roberts 195 N. Hartz Avenue 1088 Ocho Rios Danville, California 94526 Danville, California 94526 B. Rajkovski Leon Gartung 44 Montgomery St., #1858 720 Contada Circle San Francisco, California 94104 Danville, California 94526 G & S Development R. F. 0. Burdett 216 Estate Drive 21 Rio Del Court Danville, California 94526 Danville, California 94526 AAD:krt Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, Minutes cc: File 2133-RZ & #3017-77 ��`�53 Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. J�rlicrotilmed with board order RESOLUTION NO. 84-1977 (SR) RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAMON VALLEY AREA PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE BY WAYNE SCHLOSSER (APPLICANT AND OWNER) (2133-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAIN- ING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE DANVILLE AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by WAYNE SCHLOSSER (Applicant and Owner) (2133-RZ), to rezone land in the Danville area from Single Family Residential District (R- 15) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-4), and also in conjunction Final Development Plan B. RAJKOVSKI (Applicant) G. be S. DEVELOPMENT (Owner) (3017-77), and which indicated for site plan approval for multiple family group development and to have three story units, to be utilized for multiple residential purposed under this application, was received by the Planning Department Office on April 22, 1977; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on June 20, 1977 and June 15, 1977 respectively; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof was lawfully given, a public hearing was held by San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission on Wednesday, October-12, 1977; and WHEREAS, the Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that the rezoning request of WAYNE SCHLOSSER (Applicant and Owner) (2133-RZ), be APPROVED for change from Single Family Residential (R-15) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-4), and that this zoning change be made as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A Portion of the Districts Map of Danville, Contra Costa County, California, Insert Map No. 20 and Mt. Dablo Division Sector 7 and furthermore the Final Development Plan request of B. RAJKOVSKI (Applicant) G. & S. DEVELOPMENT (Owner) (3017-77) be APPROVED with Conditions (Exhibit A. attached: and (Microfilmed with board order RESOLUTION NO. 84-1977 (SR) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is as follows: (1) The Proposed rezoning is in conformance with the General Plan. (2) Is consistent with the pattern of development of surrounding areas. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Commission shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission on Wednesday, October 12, 1977, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Kennett, Meakin, Wright, Burow, Best. NOES: Commissioners- Olander, Young. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Andrew H. Young, Chairman of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa;-State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Wednesday, October 26, 1977, and this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission. Of 135ti -2- Microfilmed with board order RESOLUTION NO. 84-1977 (SR) AYES: Commissioners - Olander, Meakin, Wright, Burow, Best, Kennett, Young. NOES: Commissioners- None. ABSENT: Commissioners- None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners- None. airman of Me San HamNn Vallty Area Plan7ing Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Seczetar , of the Sari Ramon Va ey •Area PYanuiAg 'Eommisaionlof the Cotinty of Contra%Costa, State of California FRECEIVED .14 1977 R. OLSSON D OF SUPERVISORS CO5T-A JCO. 01)356 -3- A icrofiimed with board ordw B. •Rajov'ski 3017-77. EXHIBIT 'A' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Development shall generally be as shown on revised plans submitted dated by the Planning Department October 4, 1977, subject to final review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of a building permit and subject to the conditions listed below. 2. Comply with landscape and irrigation requirements, as follows: A. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the County Zoning Administator. A cost estimate or copy of contract for landscaping improve- ments shall be submitted with the plan. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed prior to occupancy. B. If occupancy is requested prior to the installation of the landscape and irrigation improvements, then either: (1) a cash deposit; (2) a bond; or (3) a letter of credit, shall be delivered to the County for 100 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted portion of the landscape and irrigation improvements. If compliance is not achieved after six months of occupnacy as determined by the County Zoning Administrator, the County shall contract for the completion of the landscaping and irrigation improvements to be paid for by the held sum. The County shall return the unused portion within one year of receipt or at the completion of all work. If drought conditions exist, the six month's period can be extended by the Zoning Administrator. 3. The proposed buildings shall be similar to that shown on submitted plans, Prior to the issuance of a building permit, elevations and architectural design of the buildings shall be subject to the final review and approval by the County Zoning Administator. The roofs and exterior walls of the building shall be free of such objects as air conditioning or utility equipment, television aerials, etc. , or screened for view. 4. Exterior lights shall be deflicted so that lights shine onto applicant's property and not toward adjacent properties. 5. There may be one sign as indicated for project identification purposed only permitted subject to the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for Zoning Administrator review and approval details for any allowable future patio covers and access storage structures. Approved details shall become a part of this permit. 7. Temporary alteration of a portion of the site or an approved structure for sales or renting purposed may be granted by the Zoning Administrator subject to adequate assurance of restoration of such alteration in accordance with the approved plan. 0035"1 Microfilmed with board order B. Rajovski -2- 3017-77 S. A variance may be granted for 5 feet between buildings where there is not major window orientation. 9. No garage shall be closer than 17 feet to the edge of the on-site roadway. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall comply with = the Alquist-Priolo Act. 11. Comply with the requirements of the County Building Inspection Department. 12. Comply with the requirements of the Danville Fire Protection District: a. A public water supply and fire hydrants in accordance with the Insurance Services Office Requirements. The size and design of the water supply and location of fire hydrants will be determined by this Fire District's review of the final plans. b. It is recommended that all roads in this development be installed by County standards and be County maintained. c. All street names submitted shall be cleared by this Fire District and through the County Planning Department. 13. The on-site common driveway shall be maintained at a 20 .foot clear minimum distance. 14. The applicant shall provide an emergency means of access from the site to Wembly Drive and at the south end of the site to San Ramon Valley Boulevard. The access shall not be used for normal traffic flow other than pedestrian or bicycle and shall be incorporated into the landscape plan, however, shall be designed to accommodate the movement of fire apparatus. These areas of emergency site entrance from Wembly Drive and San Ramon Valley Boulevard shall be restricted from street parking. The 25 foot wide minimum clear distance shall be maintained. 15. , A variance is granted to allow three story structures as proposed. 16. The applicant shall submit for review and approval the fence/wall details for enclosing private yard areas. 17. The applicant shall be obligated to pay full park land dedication fees as established by ordinance. No credit shall be given for on-site recreational facilities. 18. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department as follows: A. Convey to the County, by Grant Deed, 26 feet of additional right-of-way on San Ramon Valley Boulevard as required for the planned future width of 74 feet. Microfilmed with board order r B. Ra'ovski 3017-�7 -3- B. Convey to the County, of Offer of Dedication, a 10 foot wide drainage easement encompassing the system conveying storm water flows through the property. ` C. Submit a metes-and-bounds description and a plat, prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer, for the above mentioned drainage easements to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division for review and the preparation of instruments. D. In accordance with Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be conveyed to Contra Costa County shall consent to the conveyance of those areas. E. The above instrument(s) , which must be executed by the owner(s) before any building permit can be issued, will be prepared by the Public Works Department, Land Development Division. F. No permanent structures other than drainage structures shall be constructed within or over any dedicated drainage easement. G. Surface water originating on the subject property shall not be discharged in a concentrated manner onto adjacent land. H. Submit site grading and drainage plans to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division for review prior to the issuance of any building permit or the construction of site improvements. I. Construct curb, 6-foot 6-inch sidewalk (width measured from curb face), necessary longitudinal drainage, and pavement widening on San Ramon Valley Boulevard. The face of the curb shall be located 10 feet from the widened right-of-way line. J. Collect all storm water flows entering and originating within the subject property and convey them in an adequate drainage facility to the existing 48 RCP storm drain in San Ramon Valley Boulevard. K. Install all new utility distribution services underground. L. Install street lights on San Ramon Valley Boulevard. The final number and location of the lights will be determined by the Traffic Engineer. This property shall be annexed to County Service Area L-42 for the maintenance and operation of the street lights. M. Submit improvement plans to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division for review; pay an inspection fee and applicable lighting and fire hydrant fees. Overall curb grade plans will be prepared by the Public Works Department for use by the applicant in the preparation of specific improvement plans. The review of improvement plans and the payment of all fees shall be completed prior to the clearance of any building or occupancy by the Public Works Department. If occupancy is requested prior to construction of improvements, the applicant shall execute a Road Improvement Agreement with Contra Costa County and post the Bonds required by the Agreement to guarantee completion of hhe 003r-TJ work. Microfilmed with board order B. Raj ovski 3017-77 -4- N. Pay a drainage fee of $925.00 per gross acre prior to the issuance of any building Permit. 0. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, for driveway connections within the right-of-way of San Ramon Valley Boulevard. 19. No building permit can be issued until final approval action is taken on the rezoning. Microfilmed with board order Y i !/ •! /'• y �1/ , ..} ! i i�/ r� rte/`�{,�'" , J / f/,7 r`. ' S..;�� �`,r�: / //fes/ r �`\•., / / fly,,',•'/f /Rf5 fes\ �N Rezone FromM�a►S Tats dICIfE►ii4ri� /` Jr /r'/' �r' '!!'// r ; ` / r:T� ' Nk/ 1" 800' i, QmL �i ['�r , Chairman of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A Pba;tpm Or Tk F Qui£a km i&,.M1 sqm -MAS P I-X6 d Aun IA-L Q1 Atsi.b DivismA Swra.a. 7 indicating thereon the decision of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission in the matter of k&YML SeuiLa IS Ei1 Lh6w.A f Chairman of the San Ramon Valle Area J Planning Commission, State X Calif. ATAIT: ` ecreta off the San mon Valley Map`--'' Arel Planning Commi sion .of the Findings .M County of Calif- 003 6.1 su�suN ear Crockett Port CostaM1I��I cR'+"��MO R/Yf i y wast Pittsburg MARTINEZ •'w:. - / ,`% _r r '"—_. •'�`� PiTTSBUR ._ ;. ... NORTH .�..... 1tt=16,000' PacAoco ,r •a.., «..., rf CONCORD a .� tin ! •'•.' 1 Y a ! 1 1 PLEASANT HILL �� •'� CLAYTON , w`• .rwww J I � WALNUT CREEK .� LAfA1fETTE Q- P 1 Orinda j�^.3, f� Mt piobfa � Alamo • 4 _ � Canyon v, Maraga Diablo Donvillo $l to Location •,Son Raman �✓\\ MAP SYMBOLS ANTIOCH ,wco.Pa..aao Alamo w"Me .PO.w1{o 4.a.a{ \ 1` n1st0. ba... A.* .N,{I. L.r. --^^— un.o48{ wwo 841 3.1♦ ■3Pl. auw.�t \ ,,.✓� VICINITY MAP 2133-RZ 00362 hlicrol,Imed with board order CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XXX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2031 , Phone EIR Contact Person James Kennedy Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: B. RAJKOVSKI (Applicant) - G AND S DEVELOPMENT (Owner), County File #3017-77: The applicant requests site plan approval for multiple family group development and to have 3 story units. Subject property is described as follows: A descriptive parcel fronting 556 feet on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet south of Midland Way, also fronting at the eastern terminus of Wembly Drive, in the Danville area. (M-4 and R-15) (CT 3452) (Parcel #208-200-26) The project is in conformance with the adopted San Ramon Valley Area General Plan. The site is located within a special studies zone. A geologic report, as required by the Alquist- Priolo Act, should be required as a condition of approval. Design measures to permit storm drainage flow, which currently crosses the parcel in a ditch, to flow unimpeded shall be followed. The site has been identified as within a 60 dBA noise contour. Mitigating measures to reduce the impact of the noise should also be followed. It is determined from initial study by James ennf- y of the XXX Planning Department that this project does not have' a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets Martinez, California JwE 24-19 ` t�i ate Pos ed 15. 13M. PP Final date for review/appeal eal " brl� On.— ,00363 Planning Depart en Representative Microfilmed with board order A' , , r-7- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2031 Phone EIR Contact Person dames Kennedy Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GARTUNG INVESTMENTS (Applicant) WAYNE SCHLOSSER (Owner) County File 2133-R2: The applicant request approval to rezone a portion of a - 2.36 acre parcel from R-15 to M-4. Subject property is described as follows: A portion of a descriptive parcel fronting 556 feet on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approx. 1,200 feet south of Midland Way, also fronting at the eastern terminus of Wembly Drive, in the Danville area. (M-4 and R-15) (CT 3452) (Parcel #208-200-26) The Project Will Not Have A Significant Effect On The Environment The project is in conformance with the adopted San Ramon Valley Area General Plan. The site is located within a special studies zone. A geologic report, as requied by the Alquist- Priolo Act, should be required as a condition of approval. Design measure to permit storm drainage flow, which currently crosses the parcel in a ditch, to flow unimpeded shall be followed. The site has been identified as within a 60 dBA noise contour. Mitigating measure to reduce the impact of the noise should also be followed. It is determined from initial study by James Kennedy of the XXX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. � IThe Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets Martinez, California Da a Pos ed�l!t�lE, i�`119 Final date for review/appeal dumF- 2s B b"" 0,� Planning Dep m"presentative presentative ��t�s`t Wicrotiimed with board order AP9 1/74 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of Resignation from the Contra Costa County Manpower Advisory Council. On the recommendation of Supervisor N. C. Fanden, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignation of Mr, William 0. Smith from the Contra Costa County Manpower Advisory Council (Community- Organizations Category) is ACCEPTED. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Contra Costa County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Manpower Advisory Counci.lSupervison 29th November 77 County Administrator affixed this day of 19 Director,. Fluman Resources Agency OLSSON, Ciwk County Auditor-Controller Public Information Offi.cerBy Deputy Clark Ronda Amdahl H-24 4/77 15m O1�t�s� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Conveyance of Grant of Easement over Flood Control District Property W.O. 8314-7521 Sand Creek Channel Flood Control Zone 1 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that,pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Right-of-Way Contract dated April 20, 1965 between William P. Maggiora, Melvin E. Maggiora, Pierina M. Maggiora and Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District,this Board AUTHORIZES and DIRECTS its Chairman to execute, on behalf of the District, a Grant of Easement for use as a roadway for vehicles, pedestrians and animals. PASSED on November 29, 1977, unanimously by Supervisors present. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors affixed this 29tbday of November 1977 cc: Flood Control Recorder (via P/W) J. R. aLSSON, Clerk By 2- Deputy Clerk N. Pous 00366 H-24 3/76 15m Recorded at the Request of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY After Recording Mail to Public Works Department, Real Property Div. 6th Floor, Admin.- Bldg. Martinez, CA 94553 GRANT OF EASEMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision, hereinafter called "District", hereby grants to MELVIN E. MAGGIORA and PIERINA M. MAGGIORA, his wife as joint tenants, as to an undivided 1/2 interest; WILLIAM P. MAGGIORA, a, single man, as to an undivided 1/2 interest, hereinafter called "Grantee", an easement and right of way (not to be exclusive) , described in the Exhibit; "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, as an appurtenance to the parcel of land described in deed to Melvin E. Maggiora, et al , recorded August 2, 1960, in Book 3673, page 183, Official Records, Contra Costa County, State of California for use as a roadway for vehicles, pedestrians and >- animals. z C) The foregoing grant is made subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Grantee hereby acknowledges District's title to said land and agrees o never to challenge or resist said title. 2. . This easement is granted subject to any prior rights held by others z within said land. 0 U 0 3. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent District from C) granting other easements over said lands or using said lands for any and all purposes, provided, however, that District shall not unreasonably prevent or zobstruct Grantee's easement rights herein. w m 4. The District reserves its prior rights to use any and all of said lands C) described in Exhibit "A" for any purpose including, but not limited to construction, o reconstruction, repairing, maintaining, modifying, excavating, relocating or removing Flood Control facilities and appurtenances thereto. Grantee's use of this easement and the exercising of any rights hereunder shall , in no way, inter- fere with the District's use of said lands. In the event Grantee's use should Ld interfere, Grantee shall , at the request of the District, and at Grantee's sole cost and expense, modify or relocate its facilities to the satisfaction of the District within thirty (30) days after written notice to do so. In the event a Grantee fails to do so, said work may be performed by District at the expense of UJ Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to District promptly upon demand I= including engineering costs and any legal fees incurred to collect said costs. 0 U UJ 5. Any and all District facilities removed or damaged as a result of Grantee's use of said lands shall be repaired or replaced eqivalent to, or better than, their condition immediately prior to removal or damage, at the sole cost and expense of Grantee. In the event Grantee fails to do so, said work may be performed by District at the expense of Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to District promptly upon demand, including engineering costs and any legal fees incurred to collect said costs. 6. The land within the easement herein granted is described as being a portion of the Sand Creek channel patrol and maintenance road, as established and utilized by the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. District will not pay for or share in the cost of any improvements to said road desired by Grantee, -1- Microfilmed with board order ()03 7 and Grantee agrees that District assumes no responsibility for the construction, maintenance or repair of Grantee's improvements to said road resulting from District's operations and use of said land. 7. Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the District of and from any and all claims, demands, costs, damages, losses, actions, causes of action or judgments which District may pay or be required to pay by reason of any damage, including inverse condemnation, injury or death to any person or property suffered by any person, firm or corporation as a result of the exercise by Grantee of the rights herein granted to it. 8. This indenture is one affecting interests in land and all of the covenants herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto and the parcels of land described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Grant of Easement is signed and executed this 29th day of November 19L7. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS EX OFFICIO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF Terms and conditions agreed to: CONTCOSTA COUNTY FLQOP CONTROL WArTER�fllN_SERVATION,,DDISTRICT . 7�? - By�'���-rte. By W. Nogge�s�� Melvin E. Maggiora J Chairman, Board of Sdpervisors By �, �, ��� a r-crr�� Attest: J. R. Olsson, Clerk Pierina M• Maggiora B Y By?'l�1 �r�1;f• ;�.C�� .� '� ' Deputy N. Pous William P. Maggi ra , APPROVED AS TO FORM John B. Clausen, County Counsel By 7 _ Deputy - -2- OW368 Sand Creek Parcel X15-1 EXHIBIT "A" A portion of Lots 236 and 237 as shown on the map entitled "Subdivision Number Six, Brentwood Irrigated Farms, Amended" recorded August 4, 1920 in Book 17 of Maps at page 373, records of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: Commencing at point S-15 as said point S-15 is described in the Lis Pendens, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District vs. Englund Equipment Co. , Inc. , a corporation, et al , recorded ►larch 17, 1965 in Book 4825 of Official Records at page 602, records of said County; thence, from said point of commencement, North 520 00' 47" West 31 .00 feet to the westerly line of Fairview Avenue (50 feet in width) ; thence, along said westerly line North V 43' 55" East 52.00 feet to the true point of beginning of the following described strip of land: A strip of land 15.00 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: Thence, from said true point of beginning, North 58° 59' 59" West 40.55 feet; thence North 52° 00' 47" West 609.19 feet; thence, westerly along the arc of a tangent curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 800.00 feet, through a central angle of 330 05' 11", a distance of 461 .97 feet; thence, tangent to said curve, North 850 05' 58" West 301 .09 feet; thence North 820 14' 09" West 104.75 feet; thence, westerly along the arc of a tangent curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 450.00 feet, through a central angle of 20°49'50", a distance of 163.60 feet; thence, tangent to said curve, North 61024119" West 324.20 feet to a point which shall hereinafter be referred to as point S-17a; said point S-17a being the westerly terminus of the above described 15.00 feet-in-width strip of land. Point S-17a is further described as bearing North 28035'41" East 47.00 feet from point S-17 which was previously described in said Lis Pendens (4825 O.R. 602). { 0369 Microfilmed with board order FT 5-/7�� SPT. 5-/7a N28'354/'E — 15-00' MAGGIORA 47. 00' --56 O,R.I85 Nd�,2�'19"W g24.20� 6 o 0A,9'S0 \ r� t 50S 9. o � a R=800' O � "00 r v 09•l9 Q W , V � , D U) m + JOE h 1 60 • F Aid N58D59:59"W _ 75' + ?0-13- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 40-55' *43 FLOOD FLOOD CONTROL and .41-k/ �'�i .� 52.00 ' WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT N 59'00 5 SAND CREEK 31.00 C?.15 PARCEL X15-1 P ' ACCESS EASE. FOR PARCEL/5 RIGHT-OF-WAIF mic.mm J.E.N. I mcm M-77 scAu / 200 For location of PT5. 5-/5 F 5 -/7 ouwM J.E•Al. I o.n NOX..1977 rio.nc See Dw . ED-114 AMOM LL EB-221 Microfilmed with board order } 4 i • i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Pursuant to Section 22507) of the CVC, Declaring a ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO . 2400 Parking Zone on LAS JUNTAS WAY) (#4054F) Walnut Creek Area Date: November 29, 1977 (Supe. Dist. IV - Walnut Creek The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division , and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002. - 45-2.012 , the following traffic regulation is established (and oiher action taken as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, parking is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times on the south side of LAS JUNTAS WAY (#4054F) Walnut Creek beginning at a point 35 feet west of the center line of Cherry Lane and extending westerly a distance of 40 feet. NOV 2 9 1977 Adopted by the Board on-.-----__._.............._......, Sheriff California Highway Patrol 00371 T-14 • J In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 1917 , 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution =of a Five Year Agreement with Alameda Contra Costa Transit District for the premises at Kregor Peak Communications Site. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a five year communications site agreement with Alameda Contra Costa Transit District for the premises at Kregor Peak Communications Site. PASSED by this Board on NOV 2 9 1977 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Lease Management affixed this day of NOV 0 c, la77 . 19 _ cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller 47 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works By -'/ 1. , �/j^-,;�, Deputy Clerk Lessor (via L/M) , . Buildings & Grounds Sheriff Communications Division public Works Dept. , Lease Mgmt. , will disbribute !1 copies of agreement to all parties) . 11Q7Z H - 24 3/76 15m Contra Costa County Kregor Peak Communications Site Agreement 1 . PARTY: Effective on January 18 1978, the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY," and the Alameda Contra Costa Transit District, a political subdivision of California, hereinafter called District, mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. PURPOSE: The purpose of this agreement is to provide for the expansion of the County facilities at Kregor Peak Communications Site and to house additional District communications equipment. 3. PREMISES: The County, for and in consideration of the payments, rents, covenants, conditions and agreements contained herein, does hereby agree to ex- pand the facilities at Kregor Peak to provide space to the District suitable for the installation of three active base stations, one standby base station, and one combiner rack, together with the necessary vertical antenna space on the existing County tower. 4. PAYMENTS & RENT: Within fifteen (15) days of the execution and delivery of this agreement, the District shall cause to be paid to Contra Costa County, a one-time payment of Four Thousand Eight Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($4,800.00) as prepaid rent for space and utilities for the first five (5) year term of this agreement and no portion of said $4,800.00 is refundable should the agreement be terminated. 5. TERM: The term of this agreement shall be for five (5) years commencing on the date the premises are completed and available for occupancy by the District. When said date of occupancy is_ determined, it shall be inserted herein as the initial date of the term: Commencing on 1978 and ending on 1983. 6. EXTENSION: This agreement may, at the option of the District, be extended for five (5) years upon the same terms and conditions so far as applicable except the rent shall be at the same rate charged by the County to other govern- ment agencies plus the cost of electrical power provided for each active base station. The rent and cost of electrical power shall be determined and mutually agreed upon by the parties hereto at the time the option is exercised. 7. USE OF THE PREMISES: The premises shall be used by the District only for the purpose of operating a radio and microwave communications system compatible with the Contra Costa County Communications System, and for no other purpose. 8. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: The District shall not assign this lease or any interest therein, and shall not sublet the premises or any part thereof or any right or privilege appurtenant thereto, or suffer any other person to occupy or use the premises or any portion thereof. Any such assignment or subletting shall be void. and at the option of COUNTY terminate this lease. This lease shall not, nor any interest therein, be assignable as to the interest of the District by operation of law, without the written consent of COUNTY. 9. ACCESS: Subject to the following conditions and restrictions, the COUNTY hereby grants to District the non-exclusive right to use the County Easement for road purposes to the Kregor Peak Communications Site. Said Easement is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. A. The Easement shall be used only for the purpose of ingress and egress from the Communications Site and for no other purpose. B. District technicians shall utilize vehicles not to exceed one and a half ton capacity, owned by the District and clearly marked and designated as District vehicles. C. District shall strictly conform to all reasonable procedures imple- mented for the use, maintenance and security of the access and Communica- tions Site. 10. HOLD HARMLESS: It is understood and agreed the COUNTY shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property, in and upon said premises and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone on District business while in or upon the premises during said term, and District hereby agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless COUNTY from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage suit or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said leased premises arising out of Districts use and occu- pancy of said premises. 00374 11. This agreement is a sublease under the Master Lease dated November 15, 1960, by and between Edna Hanlon Thomas and Contra Costa County. 12. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease. COUNTY DISTRICT COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State f California ALAMEDA CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT G J- By Chairman, Board of Sup v' ors Robert• B. isbet JeInneral Manager AC9 ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ATTEST: By Deputy. R ie Gutierrez 77 Lawrence �. Ros�energ ���� District Secretary RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL APPROVED AS TO FORM: By By Pt-",r County dmin strator Obert E. Nisbet y Attorney By - /P ,c L Deputy Public Work Director Buildings and Grounds By Lease Management APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Deputy 0037) - 3 - EXHIBIT "A" Gregor Peak (Thomas) Site Description: Portion of the SW14 of Section 8, Township 1 forth, Range 1 East, Mount Diablo Ease and Meridian., described as follcrrs: Commencing on the southerly line of said SId (marked by a fence now upon the ground) at the intersection of the line, described in the right of way, through said SWI, of Section 89 from Edna Hanlon Thoras, a widow, to Pacific Gas and Electric Companyp a California corporation, recorded on May 13, 1959, in Volume 3372 of Offi- cial Records, at page h37, Records of Contra Costa County, California; from said point of corwencement the S4 corner of said Section 8 (marked by an intersection of fences now upon the ground) bears South 89' 39' 30" East, 1193-h feet; thence from said point of commencements along said line described in said P. G. & E. right of ways North 13. Oh' 30" Fest, 152h.00 feet; thence South 72' 28' 55" East, 573.97 feet to a 1; inch iron pipe set for the corner, and being the true point of beginning of the hereinafter described parcel of land* thence from said true point of beginning South . 75' 26' 55" East, 29040 feet to a 1i inch iron pipe set for the corner; thence North lh* 33' 05" East, 150.00 feet to a 11 inch iron pipe set for the corner; thence North 75' 26' 55" Nest, 290.110 feetto e 11 inch iron pipe set for the corner; thence South 1h' 33' 05" gest, L9.59 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A"; thence South lh* 33' 05" West, 100.41 feet to the true point of beginning. Containing an area of One Acre of lands Together with an easement for road purposes, described as follows: Access Description: A 20-foot strip of land, the center line of which is described as follows: Beginning at Point "A", hereinabove referred toj thence from said point of beginning South 85' 31' West, 50 AL feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 50.00 feet, an arc distance of 36.68 feet; thence tangent to said curve, 'Forth 52' 27' West, 86.9L feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, hav- ing a radius of 50.00 feet, an arc distance of 66.80 feet; thence tangent to said curve South 51. 00' West, 89.92 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, hav- ing a radius of K0.00 feet, an arc distance of 47.82 feet; thence tangent to said curve North V 12' 00" West, 10 .hl feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 30.00 feet, an arc distance of 78.61 feet to a point of reverse curve, a radial line of said reverse curve at said point bears North 14' 04' 30" West; thence along said reverse curve, having a radius of 180.00 feet through an angle of U' 35' 30", an arc distance of 139.0!, feet; thence tangent to said curve North 31' h0' _ 00" East, 120.05 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 100.00 feet, an arc distance of 18.53 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 3. 53 ' 50" East, 68.99 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of h5.00 feet, an are distance of 97.90 feet; thence tangent to said curve South 51. 29' 00" East, 8h.5) feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 75.00 feet, an arc distance of 122.81 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 34' 43' !,0" East, 102.79 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 85.00 feet, an arc distance of 96.50 feet; thence tangent to said curve South 80' 15' 30" East, 45.56 feet; thence alone a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 50000 feet, an arc distance of 35.33 feet; thence tangent to said curve Forth 59' 15' 10" East, 82.53 feet; thence along a targert curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, an arc distance of 2b.L5 feet; thence tangent to said curve Porth 87' 16' 30" East, 11.25 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 75.00 feet, an arc distance of 55.05 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 45' 13' 20" East, 37.65 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 75000 feet, an arc distance of L8.43 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 82' 13' 10" East, h3.02 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the lefts having a radius of 100.00 feet, an arc distance of 26.13 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 67' 15' 00" East, 80.55 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the rights having a radius of 100.00 feet, an arc distarce of 1L.29 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 75' 26' 20" East, 95.81 feet; thence alone a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 80.00 feet, an arc distance of 97.90 feet; thence tangent to aaid curve 013�s North 5. 19' 20" East, h5.16 feet; 'thence along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 80.00 feet, an arc distance of 103.17 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 68° h 7' 00" West, 81.52 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 215.00 feet, an arc distance of 236.21 feet; thence tangent to said curve North 5° 50' 10" West, 32.25 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the left, through a central angle of 21' 09' 20", having a radius of 250.00 feet, an arc distance of 92.31 feet to a point on the north line of said southwest s of Section 8, said point being the northerly termirnis of the above described center line from said point the West a corner of said Section 8 bears South 89' 56' 30" West, 2038.31 feet. Said road purposes shall include the right to construct, reconstruct, replace, repair, maintains and operate said road and appurtenant slope and drainage facili- ties. 2 - O()X7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 . 1977 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of a Two Year Lease with Robert M. Barrett for the premises at 1180 Brown Ave. , Lafayette IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a two year lease commencing November 22, 1977 with Robert M. Barrett for the premises at 1180 Brown Avenue, Lafayette, for continued occupancy by the Public Works Department for communication equipment used at the Lafayette Corpora- tion Yard. PASSED by this Board on November 29 , 19 77 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor Lease manayCl—leant affixed this 29 ty hday of November 1977 cc: County Administrator Public Works J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller (via L/M) Sheriff's Dept. (via L/M) By raig Deputy Clerk Lessor (via L/M) Buildings and Grounds ()9) 'i'S H-24 3j76 15m r L E A S E 1180 Brown Avenue Lafayette, California Sheriff - Communication 'Site 1 . PARTIES: Effective on November 29 1977, Robert M. Barrett here,,::a►ter called "LESSOR" •and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political sub- division of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY," mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. LEASE OF PREMISES: LESSOR, for and in consideration of the rents, hereby leases to COUNTY, and COUNTY accepts and takes those certain premises, consist- ing of an area approximately 2 feet by 4 feet in the northeasterly corner of the garage at the house, commonly known and designated as 1180 Brown Avenue, Lafayette, California, shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof together with rights of ingress and egress over the driveway to the i demised premises. 3. RENTAL: COUNTY shall pay to LESSOR, as rent for use of said premises, $12.00 for the period from November 22, 1977 through November 30, 1977, and thereafter a monthly rental of Forty and No/100 Dollars ($40.00), payable in advance on the tenth day of each month, during the term of this lease. Rental shall be paid to LESSOR at 1180 Brown Avenue, Lafayette, California 94549. 4. TERM: The term of this agreement shall be for two (2) years and nine (9) days commencing November 22, 1977 and ending November 30, 1979. 5. EXTENSION: The COUNTY may, at its option, extend this lease on the same terms and conditions for two (2) years commencing December 1 , 1979 and ending November 30, 1981 . 6. TERMINATION: COUNTY may, at any time during the term of this lease or ex- tension thereof, cancel said lease by giving LESSOR written notice at least sixty (60) days prior to such cancellation. 7. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the term of this lease as provided hereinabove shall be construed to be a tenancy -from month to month subject to the terms of this lease so far as applicable. 8. USE OF PREMISES: The premises shall be used during the term and extension hereof for operation, maintenance or repair of a radio communication transmitter. - 1 - Microfilmed with board order 9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS: LESSOR shall keep and maintain the demised prem- ises in good order, condition and repair. 10. UTILITIES: LESSOR shall pay for all electric service provided to the demised premises. 11. ALTERATIONS, FIXTURES AND SIGNS: COUNTY may make any lawful and proper minor alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises which shall remain COUNTY property and may be removed therefrom by COUNTY prior to the termination of this lease, all signs to meet with existing Code require- ments and LESSOR's approval. Any such alterations, signs or fixtures shall be at COUNTY's sole cost and expense. 12. EQUIPMENT LESSOR grants to COUNTY the right to erect and install on property of LESSOR such structures as may be necessary to operate said commu- nications equipment, including, but not limited to, antennas and telephone lines. All costs for installation, removal or maintenance of such structures shall be paid for by COUNTY. It is mutually agreed between the parties hereto that any structure or equipment installed by COUNTY shall be and remain the personal property of the COUNTY. Upon expiration of this lease or sooner termir.-:tion thereof, COUNTY shall remove all structures and equipment and leave the property in good order and condition. 13. HOLD HARMLESS: It is understood and agreed that LESSOR shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises while said persons are on COUNTY business, and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whom- soever while in or upon said leased premises during said term in conjunction with the performance of COUNTY business; and COUNTY hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising there- from, in, around, or upon said leased premises, except in the case of any structural, mechanical or• other failure of equipment or building owned by LESSOR, which results in damage to any person or property, LESSOR will be held liable. LESSOR agrees to hold COUNTY completely harmless from damages to persons or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property when and if said persons or property are passing through, are in or around said demised premises and are not a-cting in conjunction with COUNTY business. 00380 - 2 - 14. DESTRUCTION: A. In the event of damage causing a partial destruction of the premises during the term of this lease from any cause, and repairs can be made within sixty (60) days from the date of the damage under the applicable laws and regulations of governmental authorities, LESSOR shall repair said damage promptly and within a reasonable time, but such partial destruction shall in nowise void this lease except that COUNTY shall be entitled to a proportionate reduction of rent while such repairs are being made, such proportionate reduction to be based upon the extent to which the portion of the premises usably by COUNTY bears to the total area of the premises. B. If such repairs cannot be made in sixty (60) days, LESSOR may, at his option, make the same within a reasonable time, this lease continuing in full force and effect and the rent to be proportionately reduced as provided in the previous paragraph. In the event LESSOR does not so elect to make such repairs which cannot be made in sixty (60) days, or such repairs cannot be made under such laws and regulations, this lease may be terminated at the option of either party. C. A total destruction of the premises or the building in which the prem- ises are located shall terminate this lease. 15. QUIET ENJOYMENT: LESSOR covenants that COUNTY shall at all times during the said term peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the demised premises without suit, trouble or hindrance from or on account of LESSOR as long as COUNTY fully performs hereunder. 16. DEFAULTS: . In the event of COUNTY breach of any of the covenants or condi- tions herein, including rent payment, LESSOR may reenter and repossess the premises and remove all persons and property therefrom. In the event of such a breach by LESSOR, COUNTY may quit the premises without further cost or obliga- tion, or may proceed to repair the building or correct the problems resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due the LESSOR. 17. SURRENDER OF PREMISES: On the last day of the said term, or sooner term- ination of this lease, COUNTY will peaceably and quietly, leave and surrender to LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except signs and fixtures referred to hereinabove) in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by Act of God, or by circurstances over which COUNTY has no control excepted. COUNTY shall not be liable for painting the interior of the - 3 - ()1)ti81 - • 17. SURRENDER OF PREMISES (cont'd) demised premises upon termination of this lease. 18. SUCCESSORS: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto, jointly and severally. 19. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease. COUNTY LESSOR COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the St to of California Ji Robert M. Barrett y 1V. N. Bon ess Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy N.POUS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By County Admini rator i By Q^puty Public Works rector Buildings and Grounds i I By Real Property Agent � APPROVED AS TO FORM: f JOHN B. CLAUSEN, COUNTY COUNSEL ' i By Deputy 00x'382. - 4 - t� t✓ a•to `r tir% u) o v- oe. toW ` E t4 S t d cJ t-A 0 t- u c 1.1`r"p y cl ' Ltd". r;•. i h � IL A 6E • yr ` • S :: Lis. .: . , r +f w� i • . aRga-r7' RvpCR'�Y 4vV �, 1 Ito 1-! t: % 113 A),4 t' ff r, L,t �` U t~ 7"r r, C a.�i . �.... ....,... .._.... _ _..... ... _ L..t:ti�r`" • . '. . t+ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA November 29 1977 ) In the Matter of Establishing ) _ Increased Rates for Ambulance ) _ Services ) } The Board on November 22, 1977 having fixed this time to consider the report of the Health Officer recommending that ambulance service rates be adjusted effective November 1, 1977; and All persons desiring to comment on same having been heard, and Board members being in agreement, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 1443 and Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000 under which the County is permitted to provide for the transportation of the needy sick and indigents to and from hospitals, this Board has entered into agreements with -various ambulance companies for said transportation services under which said companies are reimbursed for rendering said services in accordance with a schedule of rates established from time to time by this Board. The Board rescinds its prior schedule of rates (Board Orders of October 16, 1973, February 19, 1974 and .November 24, 1975) and by. this Order adopts the following new schedule of rates for transportation services, effective November 1, 1977. 1: In all areas of Contra Costa County per delivery to the County Hospital: a. Base Rate $40.80 b. Mileage (one way) 1,.65 C. Night Call (7:00 p.m.-7:00 a.m.) 5.85 d. Code II 5.85 e. Code IIS 5.85 f. Oxygen 5.85 per tank g. Second patient '8.07 h. Waiting time over 15 minutes 5.85•/15 minutes i. Neonatal Incubator 29.07 j . All ambulance service rates' are subject to a five (5) mile minimum for a delivery to or from. County Hospital. 2. In the Richmond area (Emergency Response Area #1 on the map entitled "Emergency Response Areas of Contra Costa County" dated- January 1, 1975 and on file in the Office of the Sheriff-Coroner and the Clerk of the Board) : a. $49.00 per delivery to the specified county contract facility or any .other emergency facility as specified by the County Ambulance Permit Officer in the Ambulance Agreements executed between the County of Contra Costa and the individual ambulance companies. b. $25.00 per Code III delivery to any hospital emergency facility excluding item a above and County Hospital. 01011- �4 2. C. $18. 00 for returning one or more patients from Martinez to the Richmond area after a delivery in the reverse direction. d. $15. 00 for a dry run resulting from a call from an authorized county representative. 3. In the Central County area and portions of the Eastern County as specified (Emergency Response Area #2, 3 , 4, 5, 6, 7 on the map entitled "Emergency Response Areas of Contra Costa County" dated January 1, 1975 and on file in the Office of the Sheriff-Coroner and the Clerk of the Board) : a. $25. 00 per Code III delivery to any hospital emergency facility with the exception of the delivery to the County Hospital. b. $18 .00 for returning one or more patients from Martinez to an area from which a delivery has been made in the reverse direction. C. $15.00 for a dry run resulting from a call from an authorized County representative. 4. In the Eastern Area (Emergency Response Area #8 on the map entitled "Emergency Response Areas of Contra Costa County" dated January 1, 1975 and on file in the Office of the Sheriff-Coroner and the Clerk of the Board) : a. $49. 00 per delivery in Area #7 or #8 to the specified County Contract facility or any other emergency facility as specified by the Ambulance Permit Officer in the Ambulance Agreements executed between the County of Contra Costa and the individual ambulance companies. b. $18. 00 for returning one or more patients from Martinez to an area from which a delivery has been made in the reverse direction. C. $15. 00 for a dry run resulting from a call from an authorized county representative. 5. Other medical transportation resulting from a call from an authorized County Medical Services representative shall be at the following rates: a. Ambulatory/wheelchair patients: 1 patient $8.91 2 patients $16.20 3 patients $18.72 4 patients $22.86 3. b. Company wheelchair use $ .54 c. Gurney or litter patient $13.41 d. Extra attendant (gurney, litter or stretcher patient) $ 3.15 per hour e. Waiting time over 15 minutes $ 3.06/15 minutes f. Mileage (one way) $ .67 per mile g. Night call (7:00 p.m.- 7:00 a.m. ) $ 3.06 h. Dry run within county as a result from a call from an authorized County Medical Services representative. $ 7.50 i. Dry run outside of county resulting from a call from an authorized County Medical Services representative. $ 7.50 + mileage one way 6. Payment of the above rates is subject to compliance of all terms and conditions of the ambulance agreements executed between the County of Contra Costa and the individual ambulance companies. PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 29, 1977 . CERTIFIED COPY i certify ai the originaldocument whichtiruon file n my offe & correct copyice. Orig: Human Resources Agency and that it �eag P=cased & adopted by cite hoard of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors of contra Costa cIL 0ltv. California, on the date +Mown. A'CTEST: J. Ii OLSSOti, County cc: County Administrator Clerk&ex-officio Clerk of said Board of Superr-laors, County Auditor/Controller eputy Clerk_ 191/., Count Health Officer � � � ���� ( ��`�V"2� w County (g al C L� Si . 111 g on In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Matter of _ Report on impact of continued drought on Social Service operations IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt is ACKNOWLEDGED of report dated November 28, 1977 from the Director, Human Resources Agency, on the impact of continued drought on Social Service operations. Passed by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Human Resources DirectorSupervisors Social Services Director Health Officer affixed this 29th day of November , 19 77 B� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk j Deputy Clerk H 24 17174 - s-n.+ Maxine M. NeufAd • - Aorency .._human Resourcesb Date November 28, 1977 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Arthur G. Will Contra Costo County To County Administrator _ RECEIVED From C. L. Van Marter, Director 110V 2 8 1977 Office of Subj CONTINGENCY PLANNING FOR CONTINUATION OF DROUGHT County Administrator, Ref: Your Memo to the Members of the Board of Supervisors on this subject dated November 18, 1977 In the referenced memo you indicated two areas in which the Human Resources Agency is involved. The first of these is the use of so-called "grey water"; the second is in the impact of a continuing drought' on the caseload of the Social Service Department. In terms of the use of "grey water", I have consulted with Dr. Wood who confirms the general comments I made at the Department. Heads' meeting on this subject. Specifically, Dr. Wood endorses the attached resolution from the California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health. Basically, this resolution resists any relaxation of the uniform plumbing code which would allow the use of grey water for purposes other than flushing toilets or sub-surface yard irrigation. We would urge the Board of Supervisors to endorse a similar position with. the corresponding emphasis on water conservation measures. In relation to the impact on the Social Service caseload, I would reiterate the comments made at the Department Heads' meeting. These include the fact that we have identified approximately 200 farm labor families who are permanent residents of the County and who generally work in the area of the County served by the Contra Costa Water District. It is our understanding that if the drought continues and farmers decide not to undertake -any extensive planning this year that these 200 out. of 500 to 600 farm labor families in the County would be the first to -be affected and would probably remain unemployed during the traditional 1978 agricultural season. These families would probably be eligible for welfare almost immediately and at an average payment of approximately $300 per family per month. They would increase our AFDC expenditures by approximately $60,000 per month. They would, of course, also be eligible for Medi-Cal and Food Stamps. It is anticipated that the other farm labor families in the East County area would be less affected since they live and work in areas served by the two irrigation districts. It is our understanding that these irrigation districts are more likely to have water available for their customers and that therefore, there is only a remote possibility that the farmers will be - unable to undertake any agricultural activities this year. We anticipate relatively little other impact on the Social Service Depart- ment's caseload unless the drought were to continue for a very extended period of time and were therefore to have a major impact on private industry in the County. We have traditionally found little, if any, relationship between the AFDC caseload and the level of unemployment in the County. t Microfilmed with board order A. 6: Will , Administrator November 28, 1977 Page 2 This is probably the case because of-the excessive availability of unemployment insurance, other uhion benefits, and people's personal savings. We do tend to find that in periods of high unemployment, or where one or two major industries are affected, that the Food Stamp and Medi-Cal caseloads tend to go up first, particularly in central County. The impact on the AFDC caseload tends not to be felt for a period of at least six to nine -months. This seems to be the period of time required for people to exhaust their unemployment insurance and other resources. Because the income standards for Food Stamps and Medi-Cal are significantly higher than those for AFDC, these caseloads tend to be affected almost as soon- as a person is laid off. There has been a rather. marked increase in both the Food Stamp and Medi-Cal caseloads in central County over the last two years. We have no indications that this is directly attributable to the drought although in the case of some specific industries there may be a connection. I would tend to feel that it is rather a general reaction to the still high level of unemployment in the County. We will continue to monitor caseload growth carefully and will advise you and the Board if we begin to see any substantial increases which seem related to the drought. CLVM:cig Attachment cc: Dr. Orlyn Wood, Health Officer R. E. Jornlin, Welfare Director Ed Jackson, Fiscal Officer, Social Service RECEIVED NOV 29 1977 J.'R. OISSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS O_NiRA COST CO. B .Deputy 00389 A -i-,**,!;0T.1JT1ON 01F T.i.i. CAr,*Le0QN,*1A CONFERENICS, OF OF TATE. USE OF WHEREAS it has been proposed that various housing and pluimbing cod.z requiremenf--s he rt-1;1xcd to parmi t Ule re-11se of "g ter" where extre-me water shor'?:agos oxi-st, and WHE'RE'AS has boon slhxvi U.o conMin hi-iman urt.-ites, food rcsiducs and. other C",;g:inic TMLcr 11!;ii; will at!-.ract iiisGr.-j;s and ro-l-: ants wbich are -..!all kno,,7ri diseasc -V::ctors, and WHEREAS greywatek contains b.--.c; -16 nd viruses opublic health th -c*ncern which could constitute a co - -viii-y hazard, particularly .if there is considerable greyttraLer used in heavily populated neighborhoods, and on,-;:dns cl, amicals, such as 11111-,'P%11 AS household wastcs in grcvu aLr r - chlorine bleac'Nes, boron and I:)-- haritiful to r)lazits if used over extended pqriods, and WHEREAS Section 301 of the lin iforn. Plumbing Code, currently in effect throughout California, slLl-aLes that it is unlawful to dispose of , so-w-age, huinan excrement.or other li.quid wastes in any place or manner cycept th!:ough and by means of ,an approved plumbing and drainage sYste.m, =»d Sec Lion 33.01 -of the Code further rcquires that every building with plumbing fixtures shall be attached to an approved public or private . sr r be i.t rnsolv-?d this Conference 11^rebv expresses its opposition to the ralaxation of U.niforia Plu.-Jring Code provisions allowing the use of agreywzrter or any puxposns around the hcrae with the L L-1 4- excoption of flusihing toilets or for yard irrigation through a sub- sury_ace sys-% cm, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the major emphasis in the present drought sittuation should be dLrect-nd toward water conservation measuras vich as the use of flow res-1--rictors in faucets and showers, reduced c-,-rcics in dishwa-shers, rieduced non-o-;sential us-as of water, such as Cr sidcwalks ond car -washir.g, maxi_:r.,;n re-use of industrial process m -i F r L r L J_ i-,2r and. maux-51 j. irr P'an.ned recl�imat Ic. nd - -.-use o itunicinal waste- -11 co.;pliance witih rjublic heal-i-11- sLandarels. EXECU�TVV THIS E'Su"ILUTION W'S ADOPTED SY TRE CCMM_7TT;FE OF TEE CX'iLIFORNIA CONFERENCE OF "P.-TI.R. 0-11714ENTAT 0- DIRECTO.:'S OF EL March 23 1977 at Sac_ament_o %00390 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Appeal of ) Beacon Point Assoniates__ ) from action of the Board of ) Nov mbpr 29 1977 Appeals on Application ) for Land Use-Permit ) No. 2012-77 Walnut Creek-. ) NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL Area. ) WHEREAS on the 22nd day of November 1977 the Board of Appeals conditionally approved Application for Land U e Permit No. 2012-77 of Beacon Point Associates - for establishment of a multiple group development in the Walnut Creek area and WHEREAS Frithin the time allot-red by law, *Attorney M. E. Huguet, on behalf of Carlo Zocchi and Beacon Point Associates, filed with this Board an appeal from certain conditions approved by the Board of Appeals NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday , the 13th of December 19 77, at 2:30 p.m. , and the Clerk is directed to give notice to all interested parties. PASSED by the Board on 11Tauemhor 99., 19,77 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Attorney M. E. Huguet Witness my hand and the .Seal List of Names Provided of the Board of Supervisors affixed by Planning this ?2tb day of Nnvpmhnr _ Director of Planning 19-27-- J. R. OLSSON3 CLERK B*Ronda ruy nr Amdahl Deputy Clerk 00391 ' - RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOV 9f 1977 J. R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �.fCOtVTetA O"TA CO. B ..�t.�_ .Deputy TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 29 November 1 Attn: Clerk of Board FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: APPEAL - Beacon Points Associates Director of P1 #2012-77 - Multiple Group Development - Walnut Creek Area (S.D.III) APPLICANT' & OHNERS: Beaco Poeisifi ociates (Zocchi Brothers) , 1019 Detroit Avenue, Conco ia 94520. REQUESTING: Approval of multiple group development (224 residential units) . PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Parcel fronting 6$0-ft., on the north side of Ygnacio Valley Road and for 900-ft., on the west side of Bancroft Road, in the Walnut Creek Area. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Zoning Administrator, October 17, 1977. DECISION: Approved application with conditions. APPEALED BY: Applicant relative to the conditions and the City of Walnut Creek. relative to the Zoning Administator's decision. BOARD OF APPEALS HEARING: 22 November 1977. DECISION: Deny both appeals thereby APPROVIP:G permit as per Zoning Administrator's approval. /'7& APPEALED BY: Applicant and the G t - ^ 4rmk (See appeal letters attached) . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - See attached list for notification purposes. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AAD/gb cc: File #2012-77 Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. Attachments: Resolution of Board of Appeals. Copies of letters of appeal. Copy of notification of appeal time and date. Copy of Acknowledgement of Appeals. Copy of Staff Report. Copy of Area Map. Copy of Environmental Impact Report. Copy of Minutes of Board of Appeals. &Crofilmecl with board order BEACON POINT ASSOCIATES #2012-77 (Notification list for Board of Supervisors) Copy of Appeal letter dated 11/23/77 sent to the following: Beacon Point Associates Mr. Earl F. Paynten, Jr. 1019 Detroit Avenue 646 Eliska Court Concord, Calif. 94520 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Maurice E. Huguet, Attorney Howard Booth P. 0. Box 110 33 San Marino Court Martinez, California Walnut Creek, 'Calif. 94598 City Council of Walnut Creek B. Swica 1445 Civic Drive 1045 Springfield Drive Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek Planning Dept. Ray O'Leary 1501 North Calif. Blvd 2107 Asenath Court W/Crk, Calif. Walnut Creek,Calif. 94598 Scottsdale Homeowners Association Mr. John W. Kobzina c/o 2159 Angus Drive 505 Wimbledon Road Walnut Creek,. Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek Homeowners Assn. Mr. Edwin .Burger c/o 33 San Marino Court 2159 Angus Drive Walnut Creek; Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Pasquale V. Martirani Edward Murphy 513 Dover Drive 27 York Court W/Crk, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 R. H. Ingraham Thomas Krauss 101 Ready Road 17 San Benito City W/Crk, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94548 (Amberwood Association) Jay William Jacobus Tom Telfer (Architect) 155 Montgomery Street 201 Sir Francis Drake San Francisco, Calif. 94104 Greenbrae, California Charles Slambrook Peg Kovar 2050 Stratton Road 1078 Hacienda Drive Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Elizabeth Newfield Joseph M. Gueierez 634 Tarrytown Court 2818 Fyne Drive Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 0 ri19 3 Mr. Mrs. C. Coyle Karl M. Buesing 527 Heathergrove Court 322 Barrow Court Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Rev. & Mrs. Carl B. Gracely 271 Los Felicas Ave. , W/Crk 94598 Microfilmed with 1oard order geacun Po int Associates ;2012-77 - Notification list: Mr. Henry J. Kaider 53 San Marino Court Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Mr. Mrs. Wm. Wedgwood ' 2628 San Antonio Drive Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Mr. W. R. Walters 225 San Antonio Drive Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Mr. Hillard .J. Kerth 1757 Country-wood Court Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Mr. Mrs. Jim Dickinson 197 Los Cerros Avenue Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Lou Ann Oberbruner 5.2 San Marino Court Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Isakson & Associates 1353 Pine Street Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 00,194 Microfilmed with board order BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - CALMR41A In The Matter of An Appeal by BEACON POINTS ASSOCIATES (Applicant & Owner) - #2012-77, To Establish a Multiple Group Development in the Walnut Creek Area of said County. WHEREAS, a land use permit request by Beacon Points Associates (Applicant & Owner) , #2012-77, to establish a multiple group development on the northwest corner of Ygnacio Valley Road and Bancroft Read in the Walnut Creek area, was received by the Planning Department Office on January 19, 1977; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared on this application and was posted on May 12, 1977; and WHEREAS, a notice thereof was lawfully given, a public hearing was scheduled to be held by the Zoning Administrator on September 26, 1977, at which time the Zon- ing Administrator continued the application to October 17, 1977, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator having fully reviewed the Environmental impact Report and found it adequate; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Administrator having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all testimony and evidence submitted in this matter, APPROVED the application subject to certain conditions finding the following: (1) The project to be compatible with the General Plan and Multiple Residential Zoning District (M-3) ; and (2) Major impacts found by the Environmental Impact Report were mitigated by a reduction in density, a revised site plan, and conditions of approval relating to right-of-way improvements, noise, air quality and further design review; and WHEREAS, an appeal of certain conditions of approval, generally relating to further design review was received by the Planning Department Office on October 27, 1977, from Zocchi Brothers for Beacon Points Associates (Applicants & Owners) ; and WHEREAS, an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision to approve the appli- cation generally based on density, design and traffic was received in the Planning Department Office on October 31, 1977, from the City of Walnut Creek; and WHEREAS, a hearing was scheduled before the Board of Appeals on November 8, 1977, wherein the appeal hearing was continued at the request of both appellants to November 22, 1977; and WHEREAS, the Board of Appeals held a public hearing on Tuesday, November 22, 1977, Microriimad with board order . Beacon Points Associates #x2012-77 whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and t*MREAS, the Board of Appeals having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Appeals DENIES the appeals of Zocchi Brothers for Beacon Point Associates (Applicants & Owners) and the*City of Walnut Creek, and as a result APPROVES the application subject to the conditions im- posed by the Zoning Administrator; and BE IT FLTIM R RESOLVED that the reasons for this decision are as follows: (1) The findings made by the Zoning Administrator are appropriate, wherein the project*xras found compatible with the General Plan and Multiple Residential. Zoning District (M-3) , and major impacts found by the Envir- onmental Impact Report were adequately mitigated; and (2) The design and density of the project, including three story buildings, was found to be compatible and.consistent with the character of the surrounding development; and (3) The street improvements required for the development at least accommodated the traffic generated by it. The foregoing order was given by the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, November 22, 1977, as follows: AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Phillips, Stoddard, Young, Compaglia. NOES: Conmissioners - Walton, Anderson. ABSENT: Ccm-nissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. DONALD E. ANDERSON Chairman of the Planng Commissa.on of the County of Contra Cos State of California i DATE: 29 November 1977 ATTEST: f .1"Anth9hy esuls, Director o Planning, Contra sta Co , State of ifornia. f` 'x -2- Microriirnad wirii board( rder �4)396 Planning Commission Member- Planning Department Contra William L.Milano Costa ArLJ1�`taa F'ittslrunl -Chairman t;nunly Adinini-Mr lion Bijilding.North.Wing 1VDonald E.Anderson P.O. Box 951 Moraga - Vice Chairman Martinez, G ililornia 94553 County Albert Martin R.Comn��rlia Martin Anthony A.Dehaesus Director of Planninq Carolyn D.Phillips Rodeo Jack Stoddard Phone: 372-2031 - Richmond William V.Walton Pleasant Hill Andrew H.Young :Alamo December 5, 1977 Beacon Point Associates 1019 Detroit Avenue Concord, California 94520 Gentlemen: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal. and the filing fee in your appeal of Land Use Permit Application #.2012-77, relative to the condit- ion establishing a maximum of 183 units for the apartment complex. Receipt No. G-529073 was issued you on November 23, 1977, for this appeal. The material relative to your appeal is being forwarded to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors with duplicate copy to each supervisor. The Clerk of the Board will list your appeal on the Board's calendar and a time and'date will be set for a public hearing on your appeal before the Board of Supervisors. The Clerk of the Board will notify you and all other interested parties of that time and date. Questions relative to the appeal should be directed to the Planning Department. Questions pertaining to the date and time of your appeal should be directed to the Clerk of the Board - Telphone 327-2371. Should you have-questions on any of the above information, do not hesitate to call either office. Very truly yours, Anthony A. Dehaesus Director pf Planning By: Gunther Boccius, Chief, AAD/GB Zoning Administration cc: File #2012-77 Maurice E. Huguet, Attorney Walnut Creek City Council Walnut Creek Planning Department Rancho San Miguel Homeowners Assn. Amber Reed Homeowners Assn. Slralnut Creek Estates Homeowners Assn. Scottsdale Homeowners Association Brooktree Homeowners Association 003- 974 Clerk of Board of Supervisors & Supervisors Planning Department Col�ira William Planning .MilanssiWslNMt6as ' William L.titilano Pittsburg—Chairman County Administration Building. North Wing Costa Donald E.Anderson P Q.Box 3$1 ^ L y/_ Moraryi—Vice Chairman Martinez.California 94553 Albert R.Compaglia iVO��Le Martinez Anthony A.Dehaesus Director of Planning +.:� Carolyn D.PhillipsRodeo Jack Stoddard Phone: 372-2031 Richmond William V.Walton Pleasant Hill Andrew H.Young Alamo November 23, 1977 Beacon Points Associates 1019 Detroit Avenue Concord, California 94520 Gentlemen: This letter is to advise you .that on Tuesday, November 22, 1977, the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, sitting as the Board of Appeals, reviewed your appeal of multiple group development blan #2012-77, along with the City of Walnut Creek's appeal of the same application. The Board of Appeals denied your appeal as well as the City's appeal thereby granting the permit with the conditions imposed by the County Zoning Administra- tor. Further appeal by you or the City of Walnut Creek would require a written state- ment of the reasons for the appeal and an appeal fee of $50.00. An appeal and fee must be received by the Planning Department Office within fifteen (15) calendar days from the-date of the Board's action---in this in- stance by 5:00 P..M. , Wednesday, December 7, 1977. If no appeal is received within the date and time specified, the action of the Board of Appeals becomes final . Should you have questions on the above information, do not hesitate to call this office for clarification. . Very truly yours, Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planning By: e4e't Gunther Boccius, Chief, AAD/GB/v Zoning Administration cc: File 2012-77 Maurice Huguet, Attorney City of Walnut Creek Walnut Creek Planning Department Walnut Creek Homeowners Association Pasquale V. Martirani R. H. Ingraham Scottsdale Homeowners Association Microfilmed with board order 00398 TURNER & HUGUET ATTORNEYS AT LAW t ` `• ' , I 924 MAIN STREET P. O. BOX 110 Nov Z3 •(/� P 23 t 11 '77 GORDON B.TURNER MARTINEZ.CALIFORNIA 94553 MAURICE E.HUGUET,JR. (413) 228-3433 �;r '3•I• �� KENNETH R.BRANS November 23, 1977 Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 Re : Beacon Point Apartment Project County Planning Department File No. 2012-77 Gentlemen: As the attorney for Carlo Zocchi and Beacon Point Associates, the undersigned files this appeal to your Board from that portion of the Planning Commission decision of November 22, 1977, regarding the above:referenced project, which established a maximum of 183 units for the apartment complex. The remainder of the Planning Commission' s decision is concurred in. Our check in the amount of the $50 appeal fee is tendered herewith. Will you please set this appeal for hearing before your Board at the earliest possible date . Thank you. Yours very truly, Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. MEH:mec Enclosure cc: Carlo Zocchi �c SZ'7o 7 3 l SSU�D /�Z...3 • 77 Microfilmed. a�iti� board order 00399 � I} /Gid •moi ! ! 41. or • TURNER & HUGUET ATTORNEYS AT LAW 924 MAIN STREET P. O.BOX 110 GORDON B.TURNER MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553' MAURICE E.HUOUET.JR. (413) 228-3433 KENNETH R.BRANS November 23, 1977 VECNCOV EIVED 7 J. k. OLS'UW CLE OBO O;SSUPE VI RS ahl Supervisor Warren Boggess By.. ......_.............._....... e•p,m, 1331 Concord Avenue _ Concord, CA 94520 Re: Beacon Point Apartment Project County Planning Department File No. 2012-77 Dear Warren: Enclosed is a copy of the letter of appeal to the Board which I have filed today on behalf of Carlo Zocchi and Beacon Point Associates . I understand that Carlo has talked with you about having the matter of scheduling a hearing on the appeal brought up at your meeting next Tuesday, November 29. We would appreciate the appeal being set for hearing on Tuesday, December 13 since we understand the agendas for December 20 and 27 are already filled insofar as Planning matters are concerned. As you know, your agenda for the November 29 meeting was closed early because of the Thanksgiving holiday and for this o reason we could not get the matter of setting the appeal hearing on your regular agenda for the November 29 meeting. Yours very truly, Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. MEH:mec Enclosure cc: Carlo Zocchi g aorlhed with bodrd order 00400 TURNER & HUGUET ATTORNEYS AT LAW 92A MAIN STREET P. O.BOX 110 CORDON B.TURNER MARTINEZ.CALIFORNIA 94933 MAURICE E.HUGUET.,JR. (413) 228-3433 KENNETH R.BRANS - November 23, 1977 Board- of Supertirsors Contra Costa—County Admini�fation Building Martinez, CA 94553 Re: Beacon Point Apartment Project County Planning Department File No. 2012-77 Gentlemen: As the attorney for Carlo Zocchi and Beacon Point Associates, the undersigned files this appeal to your Board from that portion of the Planning Commission decision of November 22, 1977, regarding the above-referenced project, which established a maximum of 183 units for the apartment complex. The remainder of the Planning Commission's decision is concurred in. Our check. in the amount of the $50 appeal fee is tendered herewith. Will you please set this appeal for hearing before your Board at the earliest possible date. Thank you. Yours very truly, Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. MEH:mec Enclosure cc: Carlo Zocchi 00401 ® D !(d.0 olart;au w;ih board order Farm ROA !Memo a `y ll Sc ,t ti r •✓ �- umen • i_ Hbli rt F `\ '.' Hish SGh i MA IN ,S ••fiO=_ •V• •• % - lie Ad -�ry' NORTH 10 ntro 1 "=2000' - _�- � 8L Jam`"•• d ��• . C f 00 A ve •' ( _ „ •• �a �•' �.�' • fir •,a. 3 ,y ,��.• J.. %rpm�� • / pO •i Fdtrzhon Plant 0 Y .0 . �' _ • • ,�`� PROJECT SITE—�r=:i+ . s, ,�• _._ r4 c B 144 _ '{.,' •..,•,.. G Lam': - `�•`` ` a ,,. .��,;'. ('if fy ? It '-,�~ •f 1 `'' �•� ''�i✓;::" i'" - B—Ai �la�= a1� 1:• 1 ��` t Sehr 1 r 1._�j •' -�,+ t ir.;� 'tal ' �j�lr •,�.0 f t T -v 1` rl dop (T R St /1 a 5 Cly/ cote t ( cam_ t _� _ � •.•. `\i° l 1,_ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. LAND USE PERMIT 2012-77 BEACON POINT ASSOCIATES Microfilmed with board order 42 ..� .t-.... - -...,...._ •rr--fir - _..a.�'.:�I�-...... -..��:.�.Yra..,..___ �....-..-.-.._._,..:J.. �...l r.�..-��.I.. ��.ua�u�r.a....-r,.a_..!>. > .._...... •.. ._a.f.�. >._- c.t•, • SUISUN BAY s+�'4jYENTO QIVER 1 :/ w•.1 Pittsburg MARTINEZ rare 4 �� 0 �• __ _ PITTSBURG Q • - �� l rat ' Pacheco ,..� ..bars .. .,CONCORD NQRTH PLEASANT HILL'. 1 •* 1 1f=1 6,0001 i / CLAYTON 1 PROJECT' SITE . It - WALNUT CREEK LAFAYETTEhit Diable r Y Alamo r'••s Caayar, Morava \� Diablo Damao �. •Boa Romon ® \` MAP SYMBOLS ANTIOCK IwtoAroun. ut►t •\ \\ /"/• Alamo u.Iwtao.oAAfte Ae1►2 \ rrtt—* ..e .uo• ea.et `• � _/• 1.i•.\ �! • -----� e.11to.e. .we eAf A1tA eAMe reA.t1I VICINITY MRF - FIGURE T • 777th _ .z.r,:�r_.•.,...b..`,.s9«_.:`•.rte. s . . =:....,.nif�r?'.YJ.2.. r .:_. � i•.----.� . .... . ..1'.�.,. _ _}: $•. ., __.� ... __ .... _. .r... _ �vV a t CITY OF + :• r WALNUT REEK .9 /,r aQ iO.ii i LL \/\} �\ -M_(�,\�` `\\\ �/ R' r� s..44c is rccr tl P- - f PROJECT SITE � �/ a► soh OF A2 w CREEK ZONING MAP FIGURE-2 00 - _i,.-.-. L.._...._.. _,..,......._. _--•.^.sc�.l.4+i'�.. ..x:.. _+ti►. .. - r....•tr- ..t2..^. .- .'Lf'.,w✓-.�._ ..._",5,.,. :::r4.v_...-.,yam",. s � � " - «£>�,a 7 ,:::� � «ei„r,1lr► � 'y y: ;3�5� .�.f z S� : '�"gi-,� aY��,.Ya �"—j,i 7 . ' � -JO.S.B.f` +'�' O r �..ra-�i • 4k" � vti �1,�,��:� s 3 r.-y- �_t' 7'is's'�'s.,x k" ,T t J ] y • GT SIT '� S3�i Jj• / ' +iy �,5�\ RO��.i Yi J•A J4+Tt' 3 t IG. A „t ��,^ 'y.'ab"SI'�G'' ez�i�,.,a.X,.�s.�'� j..+��'t Y*»#,�Y 'k�'S:: -•i tr l3'FeA go 15 !` 1F 3 �' A ►fit' ~I/11 t MSL• �� e" .16 r ;riff` DO 10 t " T pl AMLa rr 6►S-TR I C? K 4 0 L r/�►'� UI�IFIE'D t � _ �.-•� -- MAP P pRGEI. 3 FIGORE t - S• y^r r l 1 cr LEGEND Water Surface ;• i; Paved Surface '.:A Deciduous Surface •� - i Evergreen Surface . ! •t� .w, rw .t•. :tr. `�jtA•�}.� 'f•'•••rw'• � , t nj DO �. ,i�l;..y.:��'. Wit.;.•. .t:. i...........•.. i ' •a stint'. `� � �! . l iL YGNACdo _ VALLEY kORr� _.. _ HOAn .SITE: PLAN MAP FIGURE 4- 04 t■^'■ +ee+[(( TABLE OF CONTENTS Envirc;-imental Impact Report Land Use Permit 2012-77 P_PC _.� Summary E I (ntroduclory f Discussion 2 -,, Project Description ,2 .aY Environmental.Inventory of the Region 3 Physical Description T `3 -' Existing Use and Surrounding Area 3 , Utilities and Public Services r 5 j t Circulation ' 6 U Plans, Ordinances,and Policies 8 ' W' a Soils, Geology, and Grading g i Hydrology and Water Quality 10 Vegetation and Wildlife 10 Recreation and Open Space Socioeconomic Characteristics Air Quality and Noise I Historical and Archaeological Aspects I5 Energy t 8 Environmental Impact Analysis I8 ._ Environmental Impact of Proposed Action 18 .Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Effects, 21 Mitigating Measures Proposed . 21 Alternatives to the Pr24 oposed Action `GrowtWnducing Impact of the Proposal a 21 Documents Utilized 27 Qualifications of EIR Preparation Agency 28 .l H ' s* .r-'^�<'0"+f+}s. �`• rpt. S S: t .'rtilti s'�.._. .__a`..'*..'`',Pr..#>_... f..,. ..� � .. 1'a1• ' s. .r.i bt j..�� ti•. ,.. S� ._..LT...t. ..7 '�.:.;,r...:. I SUMMARY Environmental Impact Report LUP 2012-77 The proposal is to locate a 224 unit apartment complex 'on a 10.98 acre parcel which fronts the western corner of the intersection of Ygnacio Valley Road and Bancroft Road, in the Walnut Creek area. Major Impacts -I-.- The proposed complex appears to be too regimented, dense, and "boxy." •4ppr' imately 1344 daily vehicle trips would be generated by.the proposal, .-The project would exceed the maximum allowable density (calculated through density'. -- Te F -. transfer) by 10 percent. - 4. The -existing noise levels and air quality at the adjacent intersection could'be ` detrimental to the residents of the proposed complex. S. The.tentative`site plan is not conducive to utilizing sunlight and shade to minimize energy demand for heating and cooling. �6. Similarly, typical design construction and appliances for projects of this nature suggesf that the proposed apartment complex would be more energy wasteful than is necessary, given present-day technology. Major Mitigation Measures - I. Redesign the project to: a) ' -be less uniform and regimented in appearance. b) utilize solar warmth'by orienting buildings for southern exposure c) _-`_use. sunscreen, 'gables, deciduous trees, etc., to screen summer sun► from south- `' facing window surfaces, yet allow infiltration of.winter sun, d) ek sean alternative to the proposed peripheral parking. ~ '..I A` noise .study (as per state law) should be made to assess the rnoise retention capabilities of the proposal. 3.. Air quality sampling should be performed at the site, and suggestions be given to reduce the effects of any adverse on-site air quality. G • '• (( -�r _ - ..y�. 1a G4 21 • 1'l.p 11. I. Introductory Discussion , A.' Project Description Under Land Use Permit number 2012-77, Beacon Point Associates, the applicant and owner, is seeking approval to construct a 224 unit apartment complex at the northwest corner of Ygnacio Valley Road and Bancroft Road, in the,Walnut Creek area. The subject property is located within _ Block 21 S .o# Census Tract 3382, and is further identified by Assessor's r: Parcel Nos. 144-060-020-021 (portion), and 144-060-024 (portion). This project, Beacon Point Apartments, is illustrated in Figure 4, the Tentative Site- Plan Map. A breakdown of the proposed units and the acreage committed to specific uses is given by the applicant as follows: Proposed Required Type ' Units 4 Parkin Parking }' I bedroom a 112 - . 168 _ 168 ' ':2 bedroom 112 224 h- Additional 56 56 Total A•r - 448 448 t -'Use Acr'ae Percent Buildings 1.87 ac. t7 - Paving 3.48 ac.. 32 Open Space 4.63 ac. 5 Total 10.98 ac. 100 The applicant states that the density of the proposed complex is 20.4 units aper acre, with approximately 51 percent of the property developed as -landscaped open space. However, the net density of the project (excluding =.the dedicated right-of-way) would be approximately 21.04 units per acre. ~1 - Internal-density (excluding the perimeter parking) would be in the area of 29.91 units per acre - ; 4 ' Two basic problems are associated with the applicant's estimates given above. These are: 1.87'acre" building coverage estimate does not include covered _ �_ `parking; which is considered a structure. ' The site plan (Figure.4) shown only half of the parking covered, when in fact section 84-28.14 of-the County Zoning Ordinance requires that all off-street parking in an M-3 zoning district be covered. `2:- The 5.63+acres of open space includes the proposed take and buffer 41 v strips adjacent to Bancroft and Ygnacio Valley Roads. Usable open space (within parking permiter and excluding lake) would be approxi- mately 2.52 acres, or 23% of the gross acreage. The proposed lake is approximately 0.57 acres in area, or 5% of the gross acreage. Figure 4 shows that the proposal consists of 22 buildings, two of which are three stories, with the remaining 20 two stories tall. A variance from the zoning ordinance-would be necessary for the two structures taller than 2.5 stories or 35i feet. There are no single story buildings. These buildings contain from!4 to 16-units, and are placed either parallel (or perpendicular to each other`in a basically rectangular- plan. Distances between the structures are 15-feet in places. . The dominant landscaping feature on the plan is a large body of water located between buildings I, 7 and 13 (see Site Plan, Figure 4). The applicant proposes a 47 foot tower in the center of the r '>`water-body as the visual center of the complex- This tower would be an or features somewhat resembling a lighthouse. 13 Environmental Inventory of the Region (. Physical Description 4 ` --The proposed apartment complex would be located on approximately 1 10.98 acres of vacant land fronting approximately 680 feet on the .,:,.,.-,-,..:,northwest side of Ygancio Valley Road and approximately 900 feet on the southwest side of Bancroft Road, in the Walnut Creek area. Typographical relief is slight, ranging roughly from 121 feet to 115 feet above sea level. The property was formerly used for agricultural purposes such & pasture and orchard. Slope is a slight I percent from Ygnocio Valley Road, draining northerly toward the Contra Costa CanaC. Existing Use and Surrounding Area The area of theproject site (see Figure 5) has been the subject of -- 'r much controversy during the past 5 years. Originally designated by the = ` County General Plan for low density residential use (September, 1955), } ` the plan was amended in May of 1972 to accommodate single family medium density, single.family high density, and. low and medium density multiple family uses. This area was redesignated in May of t is _1974 from. medium- density multiple family to low density multiple family. : (See Map, Figure 5.) The proposed density of the project is greater than that slowed for low density multiple family uses. However, the-May 1974 General Plan Amendment also allows future developers to -use density transfer throughout the- 86 acre area illustrated in Figure 5. Density transfer allows the difference between the project density and the maximum allowable density to be carried over to another project within the same area. The criterion for such a transfer is that the average density for the entire area be consistent P1, A41'r aa. a North '• :Y alai �. - js . a _ Coy oma, 1 G� 01.0 0 "s a- Q� � Cdr G LEGEND <_ mi1 ,Res _Low Publ1G end Seml 974 GENER p1- PLAN AMENDMENT AFFEETED. BY MAY AREA — f .r IGDRE with the requirements of the General Plan. This density transfer will be discussed in detail in the "Impacts" section of this report. New development in the adjacent areas consists of single family residences and medium density condominium projects. There is a large two story apartment complex across Ygnacio Valley Road from the site of . the proposed project. Bancroft Green, a condominium townhome subdivision, is under construction to.the northwest. Adjacent to the site at its southwest boundary is a vacant parcel of land which was approved in March of 1976 for the development of a : 288 unit retirement complex. Access.for this facility is proposed along " the northwest side of the subject property. 3. • Utilities.and Community Facilities a. -Utilities -. Energy: Electrical power and natural gas would be provided by tie—Pacific_ Gas and Electric Compony from lines adjacent to the property. Water: The site is located in the Contra Costa County Water Improvement District #1, and is within the Contra Costa County Water District sphere of influence. Water service would require annexation to the Water District. Although,the Contra Costa County Water .District has adopted a water rationing plan which includes a moratorium on new service connections, the subject property would be exempt from this moratorium since it is already within the Contra Costa Couniy Water Improvement District#I. Sewer: The site is located within the Central Contra Costa bounty Sanitary District. Solid Waste Disposal:- Disposal would be provided by the Valley isposalService, which serves-Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, and the San Ramon Valley. Refuse collected by Valley Disposal is trucked- to the Acme Fill sine in Martinez. The County Solid Waste Management Plan (1975) estimates that the Acme site would be filled to capacity by the year 2010. b. Recreation The property is % mile northeast of Heather Farms Park and 'h mile from Heather Farms Golf Course. c. Health The site is a block away from Doctor's Park, a medical center at Ygnacio Valley Road and Bancroft Road. John Muir Hospital, and 5- ,4 V� 1 _.... ..........a'..7.-....s.�.'w c:::n..iFm.1":'iw+•..irs+�:.c:a..•. ..Lc .....�, .- .aP•c...... _' „f:v. 1•.f �.`J.r+.�c:..i- ..- a ._. ._ - ,.e. ten. ,r..., . 't - an adjacent medical office complex, is only half a mile south of the project site, on Ygnacio Valley Road. Kaiser Permanente Hospital is approximately 5 miles to the southwest in downtown Walnut Creek. d. Police and Fire Police protection is provided by the Contra Costo County Sheriff's Department, operating out of Martinez, approximately 13 miles away. The subject property is located with Sheriff's Department Beat 22, which includes Concord,. Clayton, Upper Morgan Terri- tory Road, and Mt. Diablo. A Sheriff's patrol is maintained in Beat 22 at all times. e.. Shopping and Services Ygnacio Plaza Shopping Center is located directly across Ygnacio Valley Boulevard from the project site, with the Countrywood Shopping Center located 'h mile to the northwest. In addition, the; Walnut Creek downtown area is roughly 4 miles to the southwest; of the site. , _-7 : ,4. Circulation The site fronts Ygnacio Valley Road for approximately 600 feet; southwest of the intersection_ of Ygnacio and Bancroft Roads. Ygnacio ' Valley Road is a divided 6 Ione boulevard fully improved with the exception of the west bound section between Bancroft Road and San Carlos Road, ft is landscaped and equipped with turning lanes. -The - existing bicycle lane would be moved to a meandering asphalt bicycle path and sidewalk once development-associated improvements are made to the road. Bancroft Road intersects Ygnacio Valley Road adjacent to the project site, and borders the subject property on the northeast. Bancroft Road is presently . a 2 lane roadway, although the improvement of this arterial into-a 4 lane divided roadway is currently a requirement of - Bancroft Green Phase II,.ond would be installed adjacent to the site. The projected 1978 ADT for Bancroft Road at its, intersection with Ygnacio Valley Road is 21,000 vehicles (source: Community. Develop ment Department,.City of Walnut Creek), an increase of 8;500 over- the 1.973 figure. The average daily trip counts (ADT) for these roads as counted in recent years, and the 1976 accident counts, are presented in Figure 6. The intersection of Bancroft and Ygnacio Roads has been improved with traffic lights, islands, right-turn cutouts, and left-turn storage lanes, with signals. However, the intersection barely handles the .. _1_„ ..4:._'tY''-'.�:�Yil' �':1..+.:-`.•wrlx.a�..�•M+:.��\!s':N.,.... t. .... 1 -�. '•' f 'twtru' c' .. ' ' _ t . � .. •>.c.•2sw...v .t,.f._rJ:.f.i .'.a<Csr� .. ._.-1..:.ii...-�A.YSC'.=.5..4.'` .,. Counts taken January 1977 o Pea k AM Peak �. m PM AM.=7 :.15 -8:15AM 61 PM=4 .30-5 .30PM n94 116 YGNACIO , ' t TRAFFIC CGUNTS (AOT) BANCROFT/YGNACIO INTERSECTION - FIGURE 6 ( Z51!� y,�� � e 1 4 1 � i ,`9Y.1.[.r4;,.,.M . .i�.".•8.,.S4:.Z�a.Y ,(:.i' ..t. . .. y,i'P!'f-�G+,._, _.<�l,.li+^t^ � •,.v.T••. ,rt..v:.r.^Ctv'1�,"+ar...�w..•s6.:::.... _•...1'.'st`-, - __:+ •...,.M.� .Nr .. ..1!T.a'.;... ,,,r4i12K tc - heavy traffic flow due to the fact that traffic flows often exceed capacity. In the period 1972 through 1974,_65 accidents were recorded at this intersection, 23 of which were at night. Of the total of 65, 15 involved personal injury. Due to the wide streets, lack of pedestrian signal (for crossing Bancroft Road) the heavy volume of traffic the intersection is not ideal for pedestrians. Less hazardous pedestrian crossing points would be across Bancroft at the new signal on Pomar Way for ;those walking to the Countrywood Shopping Center, and across Ygnocio?Valley Road at Son Carlos Drive to reach.the Ygnacio Valley Shoppind Center. Minor Subdivision #152-75, which. created the subject property, was approved in May of 1976. -One condition of approval was the dedication of land for frontage improvements and the :. contribution of $25,000 toward the eventual cost of improving the r, ;•..Ygnocio-Bancroft intersection to include a dual " left-turn lane, and signal improvements. These improvements were under construction at the time of this writing. S. Plans, Ordinances and Policies The County General Plan presently designates the project site for low density (7 to 12 units per net acre) multiple family residential use.* The site is zoned M-3, however, which only requires 2,500 square feet ->- per unit, or 17.4 units per net acre. Resolution Number 25-1974 of the County Planning Commission, adopted in May of 1974 desigated the buildable 76 acres (excluding the _ 10 acre school district property) of the 86 acre parcel (see Map Figure 6) from which the'subject-property was created as multiple family low density (7 to 12 units per net acre). Density transfer is allowed to maintain,an average of not more than 12 units per net acre.except for the approximatety ten acre school property site. This density transfer • can be.summarized as follows: a ,The General Plan, in limiting the 74.06 net acres of this 76 acre -area to a maximum overall density of 12 dwelling units per net Ge has set a maximum of 888 dwelling units for the area. b. Bancroft Green Units i and Hwould number on esti 'sated 418 - units, which combined with the 288 units of the proposed "Nuez Arroyo" development would total 706 units. , c. -The-total unit potential for the vacant 10.98 net acre remainder of the origins) 76 acres would then be f 82 units (a-b), allowing a maximum density of 19.4 units per net acre. The-Open Space Element of the County General Plan designates the subject property, as an urban growth area. It is also identified by LAFCO as lying within the sphere of influence of the City of Walnut Creek. . i 4. r ' i,.•[ s S _ ' of .e .t` rk i -2• .. t .� '. t,�re t r. y Le. r 1�� �..�' f i,'N , ,r, t'7... , . '� The City of Walnut Creek's General Plan (adopted 197 t, amended 1975) designates the'property as medium density single family residential (2.5 to 4 units per acre). The Scenic Routes Element of the County General Plan identifies both Bancroft Road and Ygnacio Valley Road as they pass the subject property as connecting routes between existing scenic routes. 6. Soils and Geology The mapping of the Soil Conservation Service (Soil Survey for Contra Costa County, September 1974) identifies the predominant-soil type on the site as Zamora Silty clay loam. This soil consists of well-drained soils-that have developed in alluvium from the erosion of Eocene rocks along Shell Ridge and the complex of older rocks in the Mt. Diablo area. These soils have formed on alluvial fans and low terraces at: elevations of 100 to 500 feet, with slopes of. 0 to S percent. The alluvium is composed of lenticular beds of silty clay, and the surface' layer is relatively high in organic matter. The Zamora Silty clay loam' is characterized by moderate corrosivity and -shrink-swell potential.; Its medium strength makes this soil a good source of road fill. ' The' Zamora also has a medium to low shear strength and permeability, high water holding capacity, and its limitations for a dwelling without basement are classified as moderate.- In short, while this is not a soil with optimum engineering properties, its limitations for construction _ and grading are not severe. The Zamora silty clay loam is underlain at the site of the proposed minor subdivision by Quaternary alluvium, dating roughly to, 2 to 3 - million years for the oldest layers, and within the past 5,000 years for the top 10 inches or so. The alluvium probably reaches a-depth.of 50 to 100 feet in the area of the project site, with topsoil depth up to 3 feet. This alluvium is often interfaced with expansive clays which require specificconsideration during the construction of concrete slabs.'-When placed directly on grade, slabs tend to crack when the.soil swells from the exponsion of the clays. Building sites can be excavated and _- treated with lime or hydrated gypsum to semi-permanently swell the soil. In addition, sand and gravel can be placed between the grade and the slab to cushion the slab against the forces of the swelling earth, thereby reducing the likelihood of cracking and misalignment. The Concord fault occurs slightly less than 2 miles northeast of the site. The most recent significant (magnitude of 4.0 or greater) event along this fault took place in October of -1955, with a recorded magnitude of 5.4. Smaller events have been recorded since 1955. The Franklin Fault lies 2.3 miles to the southwest and is considered to be essentially an inactive fault, although the More Island earthquake of it}- .i • -•-. .����� , tii t rr}-T� .,t.�, ;t 4 •w ~ y •u rs �, r \{'t3 t ..t..•K t � y_#r.,�•, j, Kc — .. .. 7.e:�:-".�:a�d�.\4tZ�:a..'i 5 ..�4.e^._�:`.. -..tr'.:.s..?'.. �_.iv:c:.•.r. ,..�..:�:,,..ui.'-Si rs:Aa_.:�..'...�,:._.':�.. ..��+n ua:.'-...;-t..rr,.... :r.w..r+»�: :...a:.i• 1898 is often attributed to it. The Franklin Fault is considered by some to be an extension of the Calaveras Fault System, which is within a seismic special studies zone, as determined by the State Department of Mines and Geology. A soils and geology report for the adjacent property was carried out by Terrasearch, Incorporated, in May of 1974. This report found the site "safe for:residential buildings if certain specified recommendations are carried out:' 7. 'Hydrology and Water Quality ,There.�,ore no streams or watercourses of the property. As noted ,; :earlier,:drainage is good in the Zamora series- soils, and surface d Tr drainage is unnecessary. This area has, in the past, been flooded because of a combination of inadequate surface drainage and overflow. from the Ygnacio Valley Relift Branch of the Contra Costa Canal. Ground water quality in the area of the project site is good. The water- `,table is generally IS to 20 feet below the surface, with low to medium permeability of the aquifer. The subject property slopes gently toward the Contra Costa Canal, located approximately 900 feet northwest of :. the site. A 48 inch storm drainage line is proposed to be installed as parte of Bancroft Green Phase 11, immediately northwest of and adjacent to the project site. When constructed, this line would be an adequate facility to drain all surface water . runoff from this development. - " The proposed fake or "lagoon" would be filled from o well which the applicant will drill as the complex is constructed. Ground water has been found as high as 20 feet beneath the surface in this area. Although too brackish for human consumption, this water would be suitable for irrigation use. .8.. Vegetation and Wildlife More than a century of agricultural use has virtually eliminated all ,_ native vegetation from the project site with the exception of a few " =f lowering annuals• and perennials, which periodically have recurred r t '- since the land was removed from agricultural production. Most of the existing vegetation has been introduced. Likewise, domestication of the landscape has reduced the native -wildlife to typical grassland rodents and their predators, most notably owls and the American kestrel. Due to the increasing urbanization of the surrounding area, it is doubtful that other raptors would occur here. No rare or endangered plant and animal species are known to occur in the area of the project site. r.�.7 ..... l ..- -10 - V 00 hrt.,. 9. Recreation and Open Space Heather Farms Community Park is located approximately 500 feet southwest of the project site. There is an existing neighborhood park located approximately 44 mile southeast of the project site, near Walnut Avenue, and another proposed approximately I mile northwest of the site, at the point where Bancroft Road, Walnut Creek, and the BART tracks intersect each other. The Recreation Element of the County ;General Plan- shows, on its Interim Bicycle Paths Plan, a -,'bicycle path on--Ygnacio Valley Road. Any further improvements on Ygnacio Valley- Road should include a bicycle lane or path with landscaping .and design compatible with the sections which have previously been developed. L 40.- Socioeconomic Characteristics The 1975 Special Census for Contra Costa County shows, in Census - Tract 3382, 1,494 apartment units located in complexes of five or..' more units. These were found to have an average. of 2.0 persons per �T unit. - - Although.tocated in an unincorporated area of the county, the proposed -, .development could be considered an element of the City of Walnut Creek. Sun Valley Center and downtown Walnut Creek shopping areas ='are readily accessible to the residents. . Neighborhood shopping is available at the Ygnacio Plaza shopping center located across Ygnacio Valley Road from the project site, and the Countrywood shopping center located-at Treat Boulevard and Bancroft Road, less than half a mile northwest of the site. Approximdtely-77% of the families in Census Tract 3382 pay between $150-$400 for monthly housing expenses; with 24% of these families Ming between $300 and $400, the range of the proposed Beacon F Points rentals($300 to $370, according to the applicant)._The median . average housing payment in Census Tract 3382 was $299 in 1975, with ,.a median income of $20,233. Cultural needs--i.e., theaters, restau- ronts, etc..-would draw residents of this project to the urban centers of Walnut Creek and Lafayette, and the larger shopping complexes of Concord and Pleasant .Hill. [I' ' Air Quality and Noise a. ' Air Quality The--City- of Walnut Creek took air samples 'at the 'Ygnacio- Bancroft intersection early in 1973, It was found that under winter conditions during a surface inversion and light air flow, a !1 � ."1 � _ `ae �J fit,• r x 4 '-Y T •..y`fail�:. a TABLE I Socioeconomic _ Factors Single ,_.. Average Family Average tiedian Median Household Dwelling Number Home Community }. Income . Size Units Bedrooms Age__ EY Cerrito 15,056- 2..5 75.8 •2.6 24.6 s 4. Hercules 14,333 2 :• 84.3 - 28 , ; 580 . Pinole ;, 17,264 3 2 83.0 3 0. l5 4 Rutimond 10;353 2.7 67.1" Z.4 25.8 . San Pablo- " , '9,332' 2«5 . 52.6 " 2.1 21 ,0 14,126 „ 2.8 72.9. :2.7 16.8 : . Clayton 21,755 3.6 05.4 =3 5 10.1 Concord -241 3.0. . 2 T 13.3 Lafayette =21,207 2.8 ::77:4 :'2«9 _ 19.9 Moraga 25,935 3.2 71.1 : 3.4 . .`., 8.9 Pleasant Hill 15,089 . 2.8 73;5. :. 2«7 17:9 'Walnut Creek 17,153 2.4 43:1 2,5 9.5 -Pittsbur 9 t I,570 3.0. 78.4 : =2'T =' Antioch, 13,.175 2.9 : 74.4 ; z 7 11.0 Brentwood 9 r 778 2:3 '653 2 � 12.3 Unincorporated Contra Costa Coanty.111,393*- 3.0* 71 1 Source.- "Energy Use and Coruervation in Contra Costa County", Contra Costa County, Planning Department, 1976. i t t Sr t ve 'M,. '- s �t s �� is r '�" �, t y • - .L.. ` �' ' ' � •� J {�' t ll lily :' -` TABL� II ANNI4AL OCCURRENCE .OF DAIS`WHEN ; ' :,y ; :, ,{� r t HIGH-HOUR OXIDANT COUNT EXCEEDED '113 ' FEDERAL STANDARD ( .08 ppm) I[y WALNUT CREEK 60 50 �3 ' ' r 5r t ! NUMBER 40 ` r OF 30 DAYS, . ZO 10 s .1965 ' 1966 : 19671968 .1969 1970 1971 ' 1972 1973 ' 1974 1975 1976 YEAR ., SOURCEi Bay Area Air Pollution Control District L -rte {'.n J ' t , rl' '. ej� r.• kL-. _ a ' s t CO concentration of 20 ppm or greater could occur at this intersection. A CO level of 9 ppm for 3 hours is o violation of federal air quality standards. Oxidant levels in the Diablo Valley are high in comparison to the rest of the Bay Area-, primarily due to prevailing winds and the intensity of automobile use in the valley. However, the incidence of smog is greatly reduced by the fact that the inversion criterion in the Diablo Valley is greater than 84 degrees Fahrenheit as compared to 73 degrees Fahrenheit for i San Francisco and San Leandro (Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, Study of Oxidant Concentration Trends for 1962- 1972,.1973). The incidence of oxidant concentrations in the Walnut Creek area appears to be on the decrease (see Oxidant Summary, Table i). In its EIR for Broadmoor Unit 3 (August, 1973) the City of Walnut Creek noted that"air quality at the Bancroft-Ygnacio intersection was very poor, and suggested as a mitigation measure that those units nearest the-intersection- have air:conditioning installed in construction prior to sale, making them mandatory for the -prospective buyer... This was later required as a condition of approval. b. Noise ; Due to the location of the project site near the intersection of two major arterial thoroughfares, noise levels at the site are considered high. Measurements were made by a consulting firm - (Earth Metrics, Incorporated) on February 7, 197.5, between 11:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. . . Two 15 minute noise samples were taken at Bancroft Road and at" Ygnacio Valley Road, while both roads were wet. These indicated - that noise levels on these roads are of such magnitude as to merit attention in project design even under dry conditions. Bancroft Road was measured from a distance of 15 feet from the center of the near lane, at a point approximately 500 feet southeast of the canal The traffic count was 144 vehicles,"5 of which were heavy duty vehicles. The mean average sound level was 65 dBA with 76 dBA as the noise level which was exceeded 10 percent of the time. The Ygnacio Valley Road site was approximately 250 feet southwest of Bancroft Road and measured 25 feet from the center of the near lane. The traffic count was 416,.with no heavy duty vehicles. The mean average sound level was 67 dBA, with 76 dBA as the south level exceeded 10 percent of the time. Noise levels can be expected to increase with additional- traffic in future years, assuming that the percentage of trucks and motorcycles and mean speeds will remain constant. Ot 1 At The Community Noise Equivalency level (CNEL) is a weighted average noise level with emphasis on night time noise. The CNEL limits have been mapped on part of Bancroft Road, but unfortu- nately no further south than Ready Road (source: 1990 noise contours, Contra Costa County Noise Element, 1975): However, it may be inferred from the CNEL maps that some of the proposed structures appear to be within the 65 dBA CNEL line, and would require a special study to determine the effectiveness of the proposed construction to reduce the CNEL to 45 dBA or below. An acoustical evaluation of Unit I of the Bancroft Green Project (Buonaccorsi and Associates) was done to fulfill State of Califor- nia. Noise Insulation Standards (California Administrative Code, ::.Title 25, Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, Article-4, Section 1092). This evaluation determined that traffic- on Bancroft Road is the Y ` ` controlling noise source. In order to project future noise levels, a -- traffic volume for that development of 21,000 vehicles per day. ~� ` was estimated. : This is an increase of 70 percent, or 8,500; :vehicles per day, over the 1974 figure for Bancroft Road at the! '•>„_ ,-.corner of.Ygnocio Valley Road. This increase in volume is largely- accounted argelyaccounted for by traffic estimated to be generated by Country- wood Shopping Center, the Broadmoor Unit 3 Subdivision (now '-called the Estates of Walnut Creek), the Bancroft Green Develop- ment, and the subject proposed development. State regulations require multi -family residences located with Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) of 60 dBA or above to have a noise study to ensure that the interior level does not exceed 45 dB. The project site, fronting the intersection of Bancroft Road and Ygnacio Valley Road, falls within the projected r 60 ABA CNEL l i ne for 1975. 12. Historical and Archaeological Aspects The area is believed to ave been frequented by the Chupcon people prior to, 1811: although conflicting data places this group in Ygnacio Valley or Pittsburg-Antioch area. "Chupcon" means "slough. people" or "muddy land people." The oak trees of the Ygnacio Valley are probably the-"Robles de Los Chupcones" of early maps. This group spoke Miwok,and had been relocated to Mission Son Jose by 1811..-. . There -are no known archaeological or historical sites on the subject property. There are, however, several siies located within a 1 mile radius of the property, one of which i4 only %, mile southeast of the property. Some archaeological sites in the Concord and Alamo areas have been found buried under as much as 22 feet of alluvial soils. It is therefore possible that one or more archaeological sites would be unearthed by construction activity. t TABLE III - - Residential Energy Use Climate Factors Heating Cooling t Degree Degree Community f KWH Therms Days' Days E1 Cerrito--_ , - 4764 : 1056 2900 0 _ Hercul es 4820 _ ':.967 2750 ; 300. Pinole- - X6690 1248 2600 200 Richmond 4461 1C86 '- 2500 0 r San Pablo 3785 :"2600::"" . - 100 `r Martinez 5798 :1065 2500 500 Y .,:Clayton + 9931 1437 s. 2700 Concord 6419 r - 1054 2650 550 ytafayette 8057 1622 3300 360 r Moraga ` - 0985 2666 r 3304 360 " Pleasant Hill 7895 1154 2800 450 Walnut -Creek 6778 _1184 2800 450 j Pittsburg 6059 1005 2650 750 ,Antioch 6843 941 `260£ 89G Brentwood > '6047 966 = :2500 1000 '. Lam: •• `yam Unincorporated A a , r , East Bay Division 6733 ., 1268 N/A N/A ~ yr n v .. t J. Source: "Energy Use and.Conservation in Contra•Costa County", Contra Costa Cou►ity, Planning Department, 1976. - - 7 � J � b / c • r t 3� Y ''«J" a. •' .sem: r F- ,..tip i �s s•.., _. r-4.:.aF.... _ ., ,>.'M....:_.rG'...Mn.--..:;:',.._,.... _ > _. .YS......., «r.c.,C.'.. �.(-�... . ;.t.` r_T. \ a.:^. �7� r Mlw r - TABLE IV AVERAGE RESIDENCE _ . .UNINCORPORATED EAST BAY DIVISION . 1,268 Therms Gas BTU Use. :,.. i Percent Therms X 1,000 Space._Heating. 62 786 78,600 z ` Water Heating 31 . - 393 39,300 'Cooling ,. til, 5 63 6,300 Other to 2 25 2,500 :: MTAL'Th 1,267 y 60733 kwh Electricity BTU Use ' . Percent kWh X .1,000 Food Preparation be Preservation 33 ` 2,222 7,577 Lighting 21 . 1,41.4 1,999 14 ., _, %-942 1,332 Washing do Drying 10 :673 :-952 Television. 8 ;.539 -,.762 WaterHeating :471 666 . Other- ' ,, 7 '471 666 6,732 . .TOTAL kwli Average residential consumption in Walnut Creek (1975) .has been estimated by-P.G.&- E. at 1,184 th and 6,778 kwh. SOURCE: P.G:dc E.,-The Outlook, 1975. - - -l7 r 0. 13. Energy The average Walnut Creek household is assumed to experience approximately 450 cooling degree days and 2800 heating degree days annually,* Thereforemuch more energy is expended.for heating than for air conditioning. The average Walnut Creek residence annually uses approximately 6778 kwh of electricity and 1065 therms of natural . . gas. . Due largely to the wormer inland climate, this average energy consumption is higher at Walnut Creek than at coastal locations. Table ll' gives a countywide comparison of residential energy use. Table-IV illustrates the estimated distribution of residential gas and electricity use in the East Bay Area. This is an average based on a,large geographical area, yet the totals are strikingly close. 1 -to the consumption averages computed for-Walnut Creek. Hence t_he ,_ information in this table is presumed to be correct', t IL Environmental Impact Analysis ! A. 'The Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action t. Aesthetics The proposed apartment complex would appear uniform, dense, and square when viewed from the street. Only one of the 18 buildings 09) is offset, and this was apparently dictated by the shape of the property at its northeast corner rather than a need to break up a visual line. The Tentative Site Plan, Figure 4, shows that the buildings are long and repetitive,-the spaces between the buildings are out of scale with' the structures themselves, and the structures are sited at right angles -to each other: As a result, the project may appear "barracks-like," unappealing -to the pedestrian or motorist viewing. the project from off-site, and unstimulating and depressing to the stroller on-site. An exception to this visual mediocrity is the architectural treatment of the pool, deck and tower. However, the practicality of these will be discussed later. Their energy cost, dollar cost; resource use, and space use would be unnecessary if the structures themselves were more stimulating. , it *ey convention, heating and cooling loads are expressed as degree days. For this purpose, 65 degrees is accepted as the outdoor temperature at which no heating or cooling is required in buildings. When the temperature is below 65 degrees, the number of degrees difference between the average temperature and 65 degrees is the heating degree day load (i.e., if the average daily temperature is 60 degrees, .65-60 = 5 heating degree days). Conversely, when the temperature is above 65. degrees, the number of degrees difference between the overage temperature and 65 degrees is the cooling degree day toad. `a• � - �. 1 ° _ _ ,1. > '� � .: _r- - •721.. t �- . _�....._..a. 2. Water Consumption The proposal would be unnecessarily water-consumptive in that it would be constructed with conventional water-using devices. Current conservation efforts have shown that present-day standards for water- using devices are unnecessarily wasteful. 3. Circulation The proposal would generate opproximatley 1,344 vehicle trips per day, W 3 based on an estimated 6 trips/day per unit (source: Bay Area Air J, : Pollution Cotnrol District). It is assumed that the-greater majority of this traffic.would be conveyed to Boncroft Road via the Stratton Drive between buildings 15 arid 16. A- signal light is planned for ._this .intersection. This would increase the Bancroft Road ADT by i3pproximately I I%, a relatively high estimate due to the date of the u -;- Bancroft AOT count 0 973)• f Most of this traffic'can be assumed to continue on Treat Boulevard and r Ygnocio Valley Road, primarily west bound to shopping, BART f stations, and freeways.. . 4. Pians, Ordinances and Policies ' =_ Based on the 19.4 units per acre available for this project due to the density transfer allowed by the 1974 General Plan Amendment mentioned earlier in this report, the proposedapartment complex exceeds the maximum allowable density by approximately 10% (21.04 units per ocre versus 19.4 units per acre). The proposal does not conform to the Walnut Creek .General Plan, ;;:exceeding its maximum allowable density by approximately 425% (4.0 units per acre are the maximum allowable). a.. . Soils, Geology and Seismicity ' c . The alluvial deposits which underlie the site are often interlaced with expansive clays which may expand when wet, expanding the soil and cracking concrete slabs. Socioeconomic Characteristics The proposal would provide housing for an estimated 450 people based or. an over-oge of 2.0 people per apartment unit within Census Tract 3382. This would increase the demand for goods and services in the Bancroft/Ygnacio area significantly, through the infusion of nearly half a million dollars of combined gross annual incomes into this area (the average annual household income in Census .Tract 3382 is _ 4,\ a approximately $21,000). 6. Air Quality The high oxidant levels occurring in the vicinity of the project site could have an adverse effect on the health of future residents. High concentrations of oxidants in the air we breathe can lead to respiratory problems in the elderly, the sick, and the very young, and can seriously complicate existing respiratory ailments. 8. Noise ' _ Traffic levels on both Ygnacio and Bancroft Roads generate noise levels significant enough to. adversely effect the residents of the r :proposed complex. Excessive noise levels could lead to increased �- r 'tension and subsequent emotional and physical health problems, and could contribute to hearing loss later in life. 701. "9 `Water Quality 1 The proposal would .significantly reduce the permeable surface area within this approximate i i acre site by approximately 50% (buildings = _ ` ;:. 1.87 acres, paving = 3.48 acres, total = 5.55 acres). Stormwaterf runoff generated on-site would be increased by approxi- mately 33% (from approximately 45% of precipitation to approxi- . mately 60%). 10. Historical and Archaeological Aspects '' The site may contain archaeological sites due to the historical presence of water, vegetation, and level terrain. Development of this proper Ay without' regard-for possible archaeological sites could result rt - in the loss or damage of artifacts at these sites, and the irreversible loss of the locations and physical relationships of these ortifiacts in the.al Iwium. .>_ _ t !. Energy The:.proposed • apartment complex 'could be expected to annually `consume approximately 1,744,512 kwh (7,788 kwh x 224 units) of electricity and 265,216 therms (1184 therms x 224 units) of natural gas, according to the averages given in Table IV. However, these - averages include the higher consumption rates of the single family residences which predominate the Walnut Creek area. Hence it may be inferred that the proposed apartments would on the average consume less than this computed average due to a higher incidence of - working couples, smaller living areas, reduced landscaping needs, etc. e,� A The estimates given above may then be considered maximum probable rates of consumption. The greater majority of the electricity would be spent on cooking and refrigeration, lighting, and air conditioning (see Table IV). These uses are generally considered to be more inefficient in an apartment than in a single family home, due to inexpensive appliances, excessive exterior lighting, and less effective insulation and insolation. It is assumed by the applicant that there would be no gas cooking in .Jheproposed apartments. Essentially all of the natural gas consumed in proposed apartment complex would then be used for space he and water heating. Since economic feasibility is almost always Y tlx prime factor in. determining . the- site plan- and construction- --.'standards in in an apartment complex, much of this heating energy is lost due to poor orientation and radiation through exterior surfaces. B.- ' An Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided If This Proposal s mp emente 'The project would generate additional vehicular troffic, primarily on Bancroft Road, and on Ygnacio Valley Road and Treat Boulevard, to a .lesser extent. Expected increases on Bancroft Road are approximately ;x.1,344 vehicle trips or i I percent, with a proportionally similar increase in accident potential. - Y2, An unavoidableincrease in vehicle emissions and noise would result from the increased ADT on Bancroft and Ygnacio Valley Roads. 3..:_ Although measures exist by which energy use could be significantly reduced, this project is essentially a commitment to energy consump- • tion for however long the proposed apartment complex is economically feasible. 4. :;.Materials used in the construction of the proposed complex would also titer ,: be lost,although this impact could be reduced by the use of renewable r.esources (i.e., wood, and wood products) and recyclable building , terials (i.e., brick, copper). However, the project would unavoidably 'consume a considerable amount of nonrenewable resources. I—-Mitigating Measures Proposed to Minimize the Impact 1. Buildings _ a.. The rectangular alignment of the proposed buildings could be minimized allowing a less regimented appearance both on and off- site. b. - Varying setbacks could be used to offset excessively long visual -21- OV ' r :'S....a.sJ t. ........�..5.... ..�.i d3'�.,^..-:. _ ,y.�• -c� .. .,...-. _. ..r.'t.- v ..-, 15... .2a.:...-.ti .. "' r „4•. a- i « lines, eliminating an oppressive "tunnel-view" effect. Offset units within the-same structure (i.e., building 9 in Figure 4) would also achieve the same effect. c Building coverage (approximately 3.0 acres including carports, or 27 percent) could be reduced to free more open space. This need not mean a significant reduction in units(see below). d. A greater variation in building heights through the use of more three-story structures would break up the uniform building heights shown in Figure 5. e. -*A � more-relaxed feeling of space would result if the longest "= .,structures shown in Figure.4 were broken up into shorter elements _`which, could be .individuaiiy sited for:optimum expression of insolation, open space, and human scale. .: f. The structures should be generally^oriented with southern expo o- sures, and should be designed with southern gables, overhangs, :trellises, etc., intended to screen out intense summer sunlight, yet admit mild winter sunlight into the apartments. The present site . Ian (Figure 4) is dictated b •the.sha a of the property. ' 2.- Water Conservation a. The applicant proposes to drill a well to supply water for the lake. t" b. The-. applicant could also use well water for irrigating the landscape.' - , c. Water-restricting. devices and lovf-flow toilets, faucets, 'and shower heads should be designed into all units. -3• Parking _ `The peripheral parking proposed for this project could by eliminated releasing _land for open space which was previously ' committed to unnecessary access to parking. _ b: All parking stalls must be covered. 1= Thr,Site-Plan (Figure 4) shows perpendicular-parking which would cause vehicles to back into Stratton Drive. This should be eliminated from the map, as it is county policy not to allow vehicles to back onto a county right-of-way from a parking stall. ...4.- Open Space .1 m : The water area shown in Figure 4 could be significantly reduced. lt.-could continue to serve as a unique element of the project qJk design, without consuming approximatley 500 of the project's internal open space (excluding parking and street plantings. b. Better internal circulation would result from removing units from the water's edge, allowing pedestrian paths near all the banks. . C. More space could be provided between the proposed structures. A minimum distance of 35 feet would be desirable. d More interesting pedestrian and visual spaces. could be created among the buildings. This would be facilitated by reorienting the structures and reducing the water area in size. u`- ; e. Landscaping could be utilized to. support the recommended solar orientation of the structures. Deciduous trees, for example, could � 'be planted in.front of ail south facing windows to provide shade in -. the summer months,-yet allow solar radiation to provide heat and ' s light.during winter. , So -Energy Conservation L Theapplicant could significantly reduce the operating expenses of the "._ proposed apartment complex by incorporating the following features into the project: _... South-facing window areas. b. Double glazing in al windows. c. Additional solar bronze glass at all sun exposures. d. Full thermal insulation---all exterior walls and roof. ' e. Lowest possible light levels allowable for safety, .while still allowing normal residential activities. . = 1 f. Low electric consumption lighting fixtures for exterior uses. g. Minimum-use of lawn and other planting requiring high water use. Accent an native plants, ground covers, and low water demanding trees. Redwood chips and dolomite may also be used in some 1 Y areas as non-living landscape materials which require no water. h. - Install energy-saving appliances in all units. r i. Have all asappliances equipped with electric ig�itioi devices. r •- - .y Vi j C i. ,• 6 AirQuality F A detailed scimpling of the air quality existing at the site under varying atmospheric and climatological conditions should,be made under the auspices of the County Health Department to identify any potential health hazard to the future elderly residents of the proposed project. This sampling should be made prior to approval of the application. The d .. -•..�7.r.. .. t„i .. v-�1 t y r C^ r t „y .:: Health Department would then make-recommendations to the appli- cant forreducing this hazard to a significant level,. should the project be approved In addition, any structures located within 150 feet of the curb of the Ygnacio-Bancroft intersection should be equipped with fixed windows facing the intersection, and air conditioning upgraded to increased r capacity. Y 7. `Archaeoivgy - - r if' buried archaeological remains are uncovered during project cons- y <truction; all.work within a 30 meter radius of the discovery should be halted.=.Anarchaeologist must then be retained to assess the remains, :salvage all artifacts, and propose mitigation measures. g No. 4G -f a. The applicant proposes a masonry barrier wall to reduce off,site, noise. . b. A noise hazard study -of the proposal should be prepared as required by state law. All recommendations of the report shall be carried out by the applicant. D. Alternatives to the Proposed Action I. No Project. The applicant could abandon the proposed development y �Ions and allow the site to remain in its present undeveloped state. he owners would then be left to pay taxes on the land based on its potential without being able to get a return on their investment. This alternative would result in a 'loss of residential units in an.area considered appropriate for such use. Lower Densly . 'The subject property could be developed at a lower ensity th an is presently proposed. This would free more land for open `space an more -flexibility-in siting of the structures. The impacts mentioned earlier in this report would correspondingly decrease- in t _ intensity as_the density of the proposal is reduced. 3.r Single FamilX Residential. . Detached single family homes could be lit on fi site in place of the proposed apartment complex. This alternative would not require a general plan amendment because detached single family residential use is considered to be compatible with- multiple family residential use by the 'interpretive polices on General Plan and Developmeni Ordinance Conformance" adopted by the County Planning Commission in January of 1974. A new develop- ment of single family homes(the "Estates" of. Walnut Creek) is located 143 j ', �y!5 r 1 s t- 1 -Sk 4 '11� �' r , ,�,•-1 rid tt, ..t�•*s l .rY ' ', a Y~ rttj l .;?yr "'''._ - Awlf_ UL AVIVV o.. :�� �its�:�;,.r_►�; � � � �1��._,�,.��►- �I. �:at�---ems a:•ai®�� � �. v •:,t t� t �� 1+ F, LEGEND ` ��� •• Water Surface ='= .• Paved Surface CD Deciduous Surface Evergreen Surface :t MOTE: This alternative is conceptual •'� • - � � l.••.�• � •� a +Q aalY. and is neither intended to su99est detail, nor 9uaranted to Da faasiDla. ah ` I •, , i 171 NO N,tCIO ELLE RTy = Y ]IOAI) _-=_--- ALTERNATIVE SITE PLAN B a _ FIGURE 8 00433' - directly across Bancroft Road from the project site. The heal thy sales record of this project (21 lots sold between February and November of 1974, in the $75,000 to $95,000 bracket) illustrates that such a development is economically feasible in this area, consistent with the character of the neighborhood, and therefore may be considered a reasonable alternative to the proposed project. This alternative could also comply with the Walnut Creek General Plan. 4. Improved Site Plan. The Tentative Site Plan could be redesigned to show the structures oriented for optimum insolation, and an alterna- tive parking plan developed. Figures 7 and 8 show- two generalized alternate site plans, each with a recommended alternative method of . accommodating parking.. These examples ore intended to demonstrate the flexibility of design which exists for the site and the ease with which desirable environmental considerations may be incorporated. They do not represent specifically engineered alternatives. 5. Alternative Site. The applicant could seek another site for this proposal. While the traffic and density problems could no doubt be, significantly reduced at another site, the size of the proposed complex would be a limiting factor, as would be computability with neighboring land uses. E. Growth-inducing Impact•of the Action The proposed apartment complex would not be growth inducing as far as the extension of roads and utilities is concerned, and would not set a precedent for the gimilar development of vacant lands since development plans have been approved for all the properties within the density transfer area. However, the approval of this project could be construed as setting a precedent for similar large-scale apartment complexes .on flatlands which, unlike the subject property, may stili be practical for agricultural uses. F. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized During the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports, written and oral _ communications take place between the Planning Department and other County departments. The General Plan and its various elements are also scrutinized regarding the proposed ociion. If . additional consultations, contacts of consequence and documents were used, they are referenced below. Mr. Keith Lockard, Traffic Engineering, City of Walnut Creek. Mr. Olu Sawyer, Traffic Engineering, City of Walnut Creek. Mr. George Jackson, real estate solesman, "Estates of Walnut Creek, ` Ygnocio and Bancroft Roads, Walnut Creek, California. - - Information desk, Contra Costa County Water District. -27- 00��� "Progress Report on Trip Generation Research Counts," Volumes 1-8 (1965 73), Bay Area Air Pollution Control District. "Soil -Survey of Contra Costa County, September, 1974," USDA, Soil Conservation Service. Contaminant' and Weather Summaries, Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, 1969-1974.- Soiis and Geology Report, Bancroft Greens, Terrasearch, incorporated, May .21, 1974. . Environmental Impact Report for Broadmoor Unit Three,City of Walnut 'Creek, August 6, 1973. Environmentai Impact Report for Land Use Permit 2145--75, Contra Costo -County Planning Department. Walnut Creek General Plan, City of Walnut Creek, 1971, amended 1975. 1. - Qualification of EIR Preparation Agency This Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Contra Costa County Planning Department. The majority of the reports, are prepared by the Environmental Impact personnel of the Current Planning Division. Other Planning Department and other County personnel were utilized where necessary. Ordinarily the person directly coordinating and writing the report is listed as the contact person in the Notice of Completion, or Arnold B. Jonas, Senior Planner can be contacted. EIR Team Bruce Bowman, B. S. Urban Planning . Arnold B. Jonas, A. B. Economics Darwin Myers, B. S. Math., B. S. Geology, Ph. D. Geology Dale Sanders, B. S. Biology, Ph. D. Entomology Steve Wright; B. S. Engineering (Public.Works Department) BB:blh _28 c Y. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT :x NOTICE OF _ XX Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning. Depirtment P.O.——Box.9s1 Martinez, California 94553 Phone"(415) 3?2 2024 EIR Contact Person-Bruce Bowman r- "Contact-Person', ' PROJECT-DESCRIPTION: Under-Land Use Permit number 2012-77, Beacon Point.Associates, the applicant and owner, .is seeking approval to construct a 224 unit apartment complex at, the northwest corner of Ygnacio Valley Road and Bancroft Road, in the Walnut Creek area. The subject property is located within Block 215 of Census Tract 3382, and is further identified by Assessor's Parcel Numbers 144-060-020 and 021 (portion) and - 144-WO-024 (portion). ry Itis determined from initial study by of the Planning Department that this project does not have a significant. == .effect. on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached The Environmental Impact Report is available g p for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wingt' Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets- Martinez, California l J�kwl r�to Pas ,`�, ISM 1 Final date for review/appeal iU� �r•7 19�{ n ! g Depar Representative ._ rte":p� e_sk�. �$}•_.�s2,, . _.«..:a rm?,.:i,s, a r-i.. _ 1 ?s.: �, # �M r, < <.' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY.OF ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE File 4 77 Prepared byDate - f"-77. Reviewed by (�,'I!::���:. _. Date %�/►:��1'1 A. RECOMMENDATION: - ( . ) Negative Declaration (Environmental Impact Report Required The Project (May) (WiH-Not) have A Significant Effect'On The Environment Because: T//G _�UUE'cro6s�ls ����JE�T �pc`..S �,'oT C"�i�r�.t••-�� Tp �X /s �i�r�., �i aii,�c;.; Tv fl•eFi4' �G'E.0 L'i•ut 6 d /ry 6 V10J•r, 466'1 e-40 /J xSi.Qc y%l1.p sJ '"d*`T��/IG.�S, CaYG''.�'�O .Af'�•�;r/�vl, .f��'3T//s1r"� U�c�Ldc`f_ , / 8v/r.Q�/✓1. • 2� J l ���J��J F�:1''`4�i� L�J�T!� �I�1'? t�l �'.w�'f"i� r�J 1/�M 1 ',f!•• •i••: /��r�-:.. ••. .�"��r.�t'7v:t' �/J 7✓ C•rC.�i �f�'r f'iC�.•.�:,� �iEF G �c1 ,�lV L f1 L/t 7-5 s 0 -/i G/f r T!-:/ S c' Ti •V 0 i Ti n Nf0/c71'7& �l [. d Tfi e,e-C wo ve p viQ� iJ/ V'I.ue:E j •4 it l d!5N 0-,kV e P.!i B. PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. Project Location and Description: J✓ Yee r!" • G'.�'.,d:,e ,err �• _, !T rS � �, �o:va;'",::�4:� �2e-1 j/iU/TS �/�U/��/P �rc+:�,v �`'vF•%%Ji r/ �-�. ) �,tj/T; i !�G -� _ S7d.PV. .esd/c P,.;v s 2. Site Description: �9 /O : 9B y�.�c" .f��'�; ce ,77,'i4 7- �s .0/��sC-.�:7'f di9cr��r �I.1IG t/oiG crf �� �r✓y !/�Gc 7,o4y TioAl c:yccPT foe !�✓ice 0 �E'iJSS C�.�_ u�� c l�S. C:/.!e• oN 414Ja 4- 5 i �s3g •ez� L 4J,P- .3.' P.3. Character of Surrounding Areas: T/�c i90✓U�/!//✓G G/��✓� /�fy�r.'a�/� 7-G 4y - - �QQT// �ltST •/y�v0 • Sau>•i'! u'EST is Y.Qc�i✓T, TifiE.ec' iS � S/^/G4E fil.� c V. S/.�a'p��-sin,�� �./ ri✓� l i.:y .+F cel it,c/�r_ � �'�c C'�' �C.Q4fS FieOH` 7/'�� S/TG` 4!� E1A/l re- r r -,PO. --f-VQ /f Ile%t//_. fl�-''.�tld�/'TG>1?" i�r -iis�c �irf. n•/" t. •//4,•,v� r/�<<'•t. � �.i�-��;. 7,Ald 5r, ,,Or i. /.7 eV 7 1 C. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: Yes Maybe No N/A 1. Does the project conform to County General Plan proposals VI the various adopted Elements? (Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Conservation" and Open Space, Noise, Seismic Safety, Safety, Recreation, Scenic Routes, Solid waste) (See appropriate impact sections for application of specific elements). ' _ �?,^cr�'sD lifr.'rf�e'•,i �F_'sr. /�l�•:+• General Plan Designation* source: MUC rlIP44 ,!".9-'�'fLS/ Cl�.PG,aeSr=d f''w:t►CC7' /s o�c�lJN7TS PC2 A CS. -:Gow (.7-JS Ui.J,Ts pieJe- e4 2. Does the project conform to existing (or pf posed) zoning classification? Classification: ' 3. Does. it appear that any feature of the project, including f aesthetics, will generate significant public concern? Nature of Concern: ' 4. Will the project require approval, or permits by other than a. ' County Agency (Consider spheres of influence, and City Plans)? Z/ I Other Agency:_ j4*5r_-.c1&7- C.r2c el< .5W-AIe eE * S-= Significant N = Negligible C = Cumulative No = None U Unknown N/A Not Applicable D: ENVIRONMENTAL IlriPACTS: = *S N C No U 1T7• 1. -Earth. (Consider the Seismic Safety Element) Will the proposalRE r.esuTt in or be subject to: f a) Erection of structures within an Alquist-Priolo Act Special Studies Zone? b) Grading (consider amount, and aesthetics)? c) Slides, liquefaction or other hazards on or immediately adjoining the site? f-�ori�-,�1r -,%o /oc.J ,G-'.p r1�,�c1.�•r .d) Adverse soil or topographic characteristics (consider prime soils, slope, septic tank limitations, etc.)? e) Wind or water erosion of soils, on site or off? = Discussion: 0-0 it ..:a+... ,,..a;' ... _._...../;.. :.Y-.,:.+..,, +.3i_.. f _...,^.yy. _... ... ..•t......._.... . ._s..ro..a.✓• ...1�.,_:,.i: 1.- :.-' .t t.. .. ..ae.`r r •.Fd.}.•a `�..'.ei;�...F, .. S rr C No u NIA j r• 2'c Air. • Will the project result in deterioration of existing air quality, including creation of objectionable odors? Discussion: 3. Water. Will the project result in: a) Erection of structures within a designated flood (hazard) • - (prone) area? ✓ b) Reduction of surface or ground water quality or quantity? ✓ — c) Alteration of drainage patterns or runoff? ✓ d) Disruption of streams or water bodies? Discussion: 4.:• Plant/Animal Life. Will the project result in: - a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any ,. .'species of plants or animals? - b) .Reduction of the number of any unique, rare or endangered species-of plants or animals? • c) Introduction of new species of plants or animals into an area, or inhibition of the normal replenishment, migration or movement of existing species? ,/ d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop or existing - fish or wildlife habitat? ,c,/�s {fe.,�•., sr��-:� • 61011 - _ � [��/�`'i'rG.1'f!1 f�! fVc♦l���Cj S P T i'�i� �'�'�� •u�►f1� .�• — : - Discussion: a S. Noise. Will the project result in: a) Structures within the 60 dBA noise contour per the General Plan Noise Element? — b) Increases from existing noise levels? - = Discussion: S N C ..No 'U NIP �3. • 'natural Resources. Will- the project affect the potential use, extraction, conservation or depletion of a natural resource? Discussion: 7. Energy. Will the project result in demands upon existing sources o energy, or require the development of new energy sources? Discussion: , S. Utilities. Will the project result in the need for new systems or alterations to the following utilities (including sphere of influ- enceor district boundary change): electricity, natural gas, _ communications facilities, water, sewers, storm drainage, solid waste disposal. T« C.C. !,elA r»E.e: /��• f>r<•T' �/ � ' . - Discussion: 9, Public Services. Will the project result in the need for: a) - New or altered services in the following areas: fire protecti6n, police protection, schools, parks or other recreational facilities, roads, flood control or other public works facilities, public transit or other governmental services? _._, ✓ _... ,�, b) ' Alteration 'of sphere of influence or service district boundaries? ._ .� .:.. Discussion: 10. Tran ortation/Circulation. (Consider the Circulation Element) Will the project result in: a) Generation of additional vehicular movement with initis- tion or intensification of circulation problems (consider road design, project access, congestion, hazards to vehi- cles, pedestrians)? b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demands for new parking? i - c) Impact on existing waterborne; rail, air or public transpor- tation ransportation systems? 1Z Discussion: 004- 40 S N C No U ; • �' 1`I.' "Growth Inducement. (Consider the housing Element) Will the project: a) . Alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? ✓ b) Affect existing housing or create a demand for additional • housing? c) Establish a precedent for additional requests for similar uses? Discussion.- 120 iscussion:12. _ Aesthetics. (Consider the Scenic Routes Element) Will the fy projectt obstruct any public scenic vista or view, create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or produce new i ' light or glare? ✓` t Discussion:- ^:Y 13. Recreation. (Consider the Parks and Recreation and Circulation Elements) Will the project affect the quality or quantity of recreational opportunities? Discussion: .K11,7WI✓ C'UVN r 31 Aeap, . tA:Poak srrC 1,4 XA-t-41�c/,I 1,Y 7-a 11.1C1 Al r y, • 14. Archeological/Historical. Are there known archeological, histor- ical or other resources on the site or in the general vicinity? (Historical Resources Inventory and archaeological site maps.) _ Discussion: .. 15. Hazard. (ConsidertheSafety Element) Will the project result in a ris; of explosion, release of hazardous substances or other f dangers to public health or safety? Discussion: C 16. Other. (Consider the Open Space Element) will the project result in-other significant effects on the environment? r/ - Discussion: _ 01441 ' .. x�.......�...... _ •3'rJ:4 •7i..Y. .i..rvaw-tet•....._ •.�]_,..a -..t.. _av.a __........`.,,.. �sw....« nr.f. .. .!.••,. . .. .....f r. Jy ...�L .. _.... 1/�':•w S N C No U N/A Mandatory Findings of Significance (A "significant" check on any 01 Me following questions requires preparation of an EIR) a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or curtail the diversity in the environ- • !/ ment? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? - _ •-- � '�� �� Tom. c) Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? d) Does the :project have environmental impacts which will , cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either or indirectly?.:-. - - irectly Discussion: _ fr _ - w ,. ..,�•i,N� 1( 3 fes• _— - '.j .. Z .•-� .�rr is -; . J rt Y.x `.� _` x/76 `.-�• - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRr\ COSTA COUNTY, CALIFOPNIa Nov. 29 , 1977 �loplication to P sent a. Lat NOTE TO CLAINRNI'T aim Against the County, The cony o6 V-,c;6 document maiZed to you is yours Routin- Endorsements, and ) notice o6 the action •tahen on yoult clam by t[te Board Action. (All Section ) Boa,'td os Supetvizotz (Panagnapk III, betow} , references are to California ) given pu Auanz to Goveluunent Code Sections 911 .8, Government Code.) ) 913, ° 915.4. PZea6e note the "waan.i.ng" below, Claimant: Fdmond Cleveland, 828 Redhead Way, Suisun, CA 94584 - Attorney: John C. Smith, Jr. Address: Law Offices of Tiernan & Smith, Inc. P. O. Box 670, San Francisco, CA 94101 Amount: $25,000.00 Date Received: October 28, 1977 By delivery to Clerk on By mail, postmarked on Oct. 26, 1977 I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-notedGlaim or Application to File Late Claim. DATED: Oct. 28, 1977 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By Deputy an ra 1L. ie son II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. _ ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) , ( ✓ ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Lae Claim ( 'on 911.6) . DATED: l/ j- -2 `7 JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, B 6 Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) { ) This Claim is rejected in full. �a( I l: { XX) This Application to File Late Claim is denied .(Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: Nov. 29,' 1977 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by Alt 11A Deputy anra . NAelson WARNING TO CLAI'MWNT (Government Code Sections 911.8 913) You have oaZy 6 mo from the mEMM_g__oTthiz notice to you v_Zlin which to bite a cou., t action on thin nejectied Claim (.see Govt. Code Sec. 945.6) ok 6 months 6Aom the denial. of yours Application to File a Laze Claim w.i tti.n which to petition a eoutt Son netieS S,tom Section 945.4's cl im-4iti.ptg deadline (see Section 946.6) . You may aeek the advice o ' any attorney oS your choice in connection with tAis mattm IS you want to con,6u2t an attotrzey, you .6hou.ld do so immediately. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board T0: 1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator, & (3) Public Works, Business & Services Division Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: Nov. 30, 1977 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By Deputy Sandra Z. N' elson V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator, T0: Ylerk of the Board (3) Public Works of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim or Application and Board Order. '00443 DATED:Nov. 30, 1977 County Counsel, By - County Administrator, Ey Public Works, By 8. 1 Rev. 3/77 (SPACH BELOW PDX FnZ*4G SrA30 ONLY) CeraW IYWMW 1(4mCSm;tk,'r Lawoffices of-flemn&Sin* h inc.t G FORM&-094101 San pNo6woCAUbffia 2 (.1-3)621-M1 3 F I L 4 0C T '20 8 1377 5 A=m,r&c Claimant J. R. OLS-3014 CLERK BOARD CF SUPERVZOI PS CONTRA COSTA CO. 6 Nist'_ze ty 7 8 EDMOND CLEVELAND, 9 Claimant, NO. P-S' 10 VS. APPLICATION TO PRESENT CLAIM UNDER SECTION 911.4 OF THE 11 BROOKSIDE HOSPITAL, et al. , GOVERNMENT CODE ON BEHALF OF EDMOND CLEVELAND 12 Defendant. 13, 14 To: Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, P.O. Box 911, Martinez, California 94553 15 1. 1, JOHN C. SMITH, JR., the undersigned, as a person . 16 acting on behalf of and as attorney for the claimant, apply for 17 leave to present a claim under Government code Section 911.4. The 18 19 claim is founded on a cause of action for personal injuries which resulted from an occurrence on January 3, 1977, and for which a 20 claim was not presented within the lot}-day period provided by the 21 Government Code Section 911.2. For additional circumstances rela- 22 ting to the cause of action, reference is made to the proposed claim 23 24 attached to and incorporated as a part of this application and to 25 the accompanying declaration of John C. Smith, Jr. 2. The reason for the delay in presenting this claim 26 microfilmed with board order 00444 1 was through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, 2 and Brookside H6spital was not Prejudiced by the failure to 3 present this claim within the time specified in Government Code 4 Section 911.2; all as more particularly shown by the attached 5 declaration of John C. Smith, Jr. 6 3. 1 am presenting this application within a reason- 7 able time after the accrual of this cause of action, as more 8 particularly shown by the attached declaration of John C. Smith, 9 Jr. 10 WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that my application 11 be granted and that the attached proposed claim be received and 12 acted on in accordance with Goverment Code Sections 912.4 and 13 912.6. 14 DATED: October 26, 1977 15 LAW OFFICES OF TIERNAN & SMITH, INC. 16 17 B is JOHUC. SMITH, JR. Attorneys for Claimant 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Microfilmed with board order 0 0 4 45- } • 1 I ► .(d) The extent of the claimant's injuries and damages 2 is unknown at this time as no statement or medical report has 3 yet been received. 4 (e) The amount of this claim is indefinite, but is in 5 excess of $25,000.00. This claim is submitted on behalf of the 6 claimant by his attorneys, Law Offices of Tiernan & Smith, Inc. 7 DATED: - October 26, 1977 8 9 By JOHWC SMITH, JR. 10 Attorney for claimant: 11 12 13 14 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 t Microfilmed with board order 00446 (SPAo3 BaaW POR FUJNG Sri ONLY) Gerald JYwman john CSmitn,it Lawoffices of Tlenwn&Smith Inc. KAM0094101 SanFnnc&o,Caiifomia 2 (415)621-0M1 3 4 5 Anomer for Claimant 6 7 8 EDMOND CLEVELAND, ) 9 Claimant, ) NO. 10 vs. ) CLAIM AGAINST BROOKSIDE HOSPITAL 11 BROOKSIDE HOSPITAL, et al. , ) 12 Defendant. ) 13 To: Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County; P.O, Box 911, 14 Martinez, California 94553 15 (a) Name and Address of Claimant: 16 Edmond Cleveland 828 Redhead Way 17 Suisun, California 94584 18 (b) Please address all notices to Law Offices of Tiernan 19 & Smith, Inc. P.O. Box 670, San Francisco, California 94101. 20 (c) This claim arises out of an incident which occurred 21 on January 3, 1977, when the claimant fell from scaffolding at 22 Brookside Hospital • in the City of San Pablo. Said scaffolding at 23 Brookside Hospital was owned, maintained, and under the care and 24 control of the city of San Pablo. Said scaffolding was improper, 25 thereby causing claimant to fall proximately sustaining injuries 26 and damages as herein alleged. •r7- „ Microfilmed with board order 0044'1 '' (SPA6 B30cJ ?G3 FILltiG Sri3� O.rZ� Geraid Owman }ohn C Smith,Jr 1 Lawofficesof Tlefnan&Sm;th inc. FORM&M 9-nOl SmF=+Kisco,Caiiiornia 2 3 4 Claimant 5 A;toraeTs fnr 6 7 8 EDNIOND CLEVELAND, ) 9 Claimant, ) NO. 10 vs. } DECLARATION OF JOHN C. SMITH, JR. IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION TO 11 BROOKSIDE HOSPITAL, et al., ) PRESENT CLAIM UNDER SECTION 911.4 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE ON BEHALF 12 Defendant. ) OF EDMOND CLEVELAND 13 ) 14 To: Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, P.O. Box 911, Martinez, California 94553 15 • I, JOHN C. SMITH, JR. , declare: 16 17 That I am one of the attorneys for the claimant herein. That on January 3, 1977, claimant slipped and fell from a 18 19 scaffolding while working in the course and scope of his employment 20 with Williams & Burrows, Inc. , a construction company, on the premises known as Brookside Hospital; that through mistake, 21 22 inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, there was delay in presenting this claim and Brookside Hospital %ras not •prejudiced by 23 24 the failure to present this claim within the time specified in 25 Government Code Section 911.2; that claimant first came to my 26 office on August 10, 1977 which was his first knowledge of the Microfilmed with board order 00L�C��j I 100-day claim statute. 2 The aforementioned claim is attached to and 3 incorporated as a part of this decal.ration of John C. Smith, Jr. 4 The claim is based upon negligent maintenance, control, 5 care of the scaffolding under the control and maintenance of 6 Brookside Hospital located at San Pablo, California. Said 7 scaffolding at Brookside Hospital was .improper, thereby causing 8 claimant to fall proximately sustaining the injuries and damages 9 he received. 10 Declarant respectfully prays that the attached claim 11 presented to the West Contra Costa Hospital District be acted 12 upon. 13 I declare Tinder penalty of perjury that the foregoing 14 is true and correct. 15 Executed in San Francisco, California on October 26, 16 1977. 17 It JOHN C. SMI'IM, JR 18 Attorneys for Claimant 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 00449 Microfilm-nd with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Rental Agreement 981 Castle Rock Road Walnut Creek IT IS BY BOARD ORDERED that the Rental Agreement with Blaik Musolf and Nancy Cutshall , dated November 21 , 1977, for rental of County-owned property at 981 Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek is APPROVED, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to sign the Agreement on behalf of the County. The Agreement is on a month to month "as is" basis at a monthly rate of $300.00, effective December 1 , 1977. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors affixed this 29tWoy of November _ 1977 cc: Auditor-Controller _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �- Dui , Deputy Clerk N. Pous 00450 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 _' 19 77 In the Matter of Approving and Authorizing Contract for Property Acquisition, Center Avenue Project No. 3471-4342-663-76 Pacheco Area : IT IS BY THE�BOARD ORDERED that the Deed and Right of Way Contract, dated November 16, 1977, from the Mt. Diablo Unified School District are APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to sign the contract on behalf of the County. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept the above deed for the County of Contra Costa for recording. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. R 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department, Supervisors Real Property Division affixed this 29tMay of November . 1977 cc: Auditor�Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk N. Pous 00451 H-24 3/76 15m l { In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29, , 19 77 In the Matter of Approving Proposal by the City of Walnut Creek to Proceed with Appraisal and Negotiations to Acquire Property for Park Purposes. County Service Area R-8 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that, in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement dated September 17, 1974 between the City of Walnut Creek and County, the City's proposal to proceed with appraisals and preliminary negotiations for the purchase of the Lea property on Oak Road for park purposes is hereby APPROVED. The acquisition will provide an additional .83 acres to the 3.64 acre Walden Park previously acquired by the County on behalf of County Service Area R-8. The purchase will be financed from the proceeds of the sale of the $6,750,000.00 1974 Parks and Open Space Bonds previously authorized by the Board for County Service Area R-8. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Public Works Dept. (Service Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Area Coordinator) Supers cc: Public Works Director (2) affixed this29th day of November 19 Z7 City of Walnut Creek (via P/W) County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel County Auditor By- 2/ a ��'Z`� . Deputy Clerk Director of Planning N. Pous H-24 3/76 15m 00452 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 . 1977 In the Matter of - Appeal of Quandt District Improvement Association et al NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPEAL from Planning Commission Approval of the Tentative Map for Subdivision 4871, Lafayette ArA n 1.1HEREAS on the 25th day of October, 1977 the Planning Commission approved the tentative map for Subdivision 4871, Lafayette area, filed by Arnico, Inc, ; and WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, Attorney William J, Hooy, on behalf of Quandt District Improvement Association et al, filed with this Board an appeal from said action; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday, the 13th day of December, 1977 at 2 p.m, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to . give notice to all interested parties. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977, J I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. - Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ccAttorney W, J. Hooy List of Names Provided Supervisor by Planning affixed this 29th day of November 1977 Director of Planning J.VLDeputy SSON, Clerk sy Clerk 4onda a 004.53 H-24 4/77 15m 1 t RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY N 0 V-23 1977 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. R. O„„SO,y CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ONT C TA CO. 9 " ..De TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: November 23, 1977 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu i SUBJECT: Appeal , Subdivision 4371 Director of Planni g Arnico, Inc. (Lafayette area) 1l APPLICANT & OWNE Arnico, Inc. , 1093 Shary Circle, Concord 94520. ENGINEER: The Humann Company, 1021 Brown Avenue, Lafayette 94549. APPELLANT: . William J. Hooy, Attorney, representing the Quandt District Improvement Association and Springbrook Neighborhood Association, 3135 Clayton Road, Concord plus 7 property owners in the area. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 10-15-77 - Study Session. 10-25-77 - Planning Commission hearing. DECISION: Approved tentative map for 19 lots. APPEAL FILED: 11-7-77. Reasons for Appeal : See attached letter from William J. Hooy, Attorney consisting of 5 pages - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following people should be notified of the Board of Supervisors, hearing date and time: William J. Hooy Quandt District Improvement Association Attorney-at-Law 1265 Del Arroyo Court 3135 Clayton Road Lafayette', California 94549 Concord, Calif. 94520 (See attached list. for additional names and addresses.) AAD: Isw Attachments: Letter of Appeal , Resolution of Approval , EIR, Map. Microfilmad with board order C' ()f)454 Board of Supervisors - 2 - November 23, 1977 The Humann Company Arnico, Incorporated 1021 Brown Avenue 1093 Shary Circle Lafayette, CA 94549 Concord, CA 94520 Charles Wing Springbrook Neighborhood Association Fejes & Wing Merle Johnson, Chairman 975 Oakland St. , Suite 330 1188 Pleasant Hill Circle Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 R. Eshleman Jack Hohenstein 1211 Newell Avenue 1234 Laurel Lane Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Lafayette, California 94549 Mrs. Helen Fryman Joseph Hippie 1281 Summit Road 3377 Reliez Highland Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Robert Kropschot Claude Harman 1264 Del Arroyo Ct. 1265 Del Arroyo Ct. Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Larry Cowan Patrick J. Kenney 1271 Summit Road 1294 Candy Court Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Ms. Pattie Nelson Harvey E. Bragdon 3232 Quandt Road 4 Barrie Way Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Mill Valley, Calif. 94541 A. R. Peterson N. L. Houkes 3195 Quandt 1310 Pleasant Hill Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Jane DeMeter Ronald Henrickson 1313 Summit Road 1253 Summit Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Robert Becker Charles Collins 1269 Summit Road 1638 American Beauty Drive Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Concord, Calif. 94521 Edgar Lion Dana Murdoch City of Lafayette Tinning E DeLap 975 Oakland Street 1211 Newell Avenue Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94549 Jonathan Guterres Patricia Baxter 1312 Masterson Lane 1272 Del Arroyo Ct. Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Microfilmad with board order 00455 Board of Supervisors - 3 - November 23, 1977 Joseph Hippie Robert and Margery Howe• 3377 Reliez Highland Road 1334 Summit Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Ernest Lunbocher Mr. and Mrs. G. N.Houck 3261 Quandt Road 3255 Quandt Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 W. Vencill Da-Min-Ho 1273 Del Arroyo Ct. 3249 Quandt Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Donald Derito David Swanberg 1291 Summit Road 1288 Candy Ct. Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Hubert and Peggy Yarbrough 3237 Quandt Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Microfihod wif i board ordgr O 45 W ILLI AM J. HOOY _• . - ATTORNEY AT LAW 3135 CLAYTON ROAD s CONCORD,CALIFORNIA 94520 iiu�l j _4 f :� 11 TELEPHONE (415) 798-0426 " November 7, 1977 The Honorable Warren N. Boggess Chairman, and Members of the Board of Supervisors . Contra Costa County County Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Re: Appeal from action of the County Planning Commission in approving 19 lots for Subdivision 4871 Dear Chairman Boggess and Members of the County Board of Supervisors, This is an appeal from the action taken on October 25, 1977, by the County Planning Commission in fixing at nineteen the number of lots which will be authorized for Subdivision 4871 and in approving the tentative subdivision map for this tract. This appeal is taken under Sections 26-2.2404, et seq, of• the Contra Costa County Code. I am filing this appeal on behalf of the following families in the area adjacent to the pro- posed subdivision: (1) Lawrence Cowan, 1271 Summit Road, Lafayette, California (2) Donald & Jane Dirito, 1291 Summit Road, Lafayette, Calif, (3) Robert & Helen Fryman, 1281 Summit Road, Lafayette, Calif. (4) Ronald Henrickson, 1253 Summit Road, Lafayette, Calif. (5) Jack Hohenstein, 1234 Laurel Lane, Lafayette, California (6) Robert& Corinne Kropschot, 1264 Del Arroyo Ct.,Lafayette,Ca. (7) Bill & Barbara Vencill, 1273 Del Arroyo Ct., Lafayettc,Ca. I also represent the Quandt District Improvement Association, which is the association of homeowners in the Quandt District area in which this project lies. The appeal is also filed on behalf of the Springbrook Neighborhood Association, which also is an association of homeowners in this district. For con- venience in this appeal, I'll refer to all of the foregoing as "neighbors" and "neighborhood" and to the applicant here as the "developer" . This appeal is taken and based on the following points: 004.5 Microfilmed wi9h board order. Page 2 -'Board of Supervisors 1. The developer here has not presented satisfactory evidence to the neighborhood demonstrating that this site can be de- veloped to the density proposed. When- this matter was prev- iously submitted, your Board referred it back .to the Director of Planning for determination of the final number of lots, (between 10 and 26) which would be allowed in this subdivision. The final decision was to be made "only after consultation with the neighborhood" . True consultation did not really take place. it should be clear at the outset that the neighborhood is not intimating that this failure was a result of bad faith .or any kind of neglect. The failure was the result of circumstance and nothing more. The planning staff of the County did in fact have extended meetings with representatives of the neigh- borhood on September 16, 1977, and again on October 21, 1977. The first such meeting discussed the developer's proposal for twenty-six lots with specific designated "greenbelt areas" . Atter study and consultation with members, the neighborhood responded by letter, dated October 10, 1977, to the County planning staff. This letter (a copy of which is attached) re- flects a confusion by the neighborhood over what the develop- er intended particularly in the area of grading and drainage. The second meeting with the neighborhood was on October 21, 1977, and this concerned a proposal by the developer for a total of twenty lots with no greenbelt involved. The County staff indicated they felt eighteen lots would be proper and explained in more detail the process for development should the matter go forward. The staff then advised that the. sub-- division was set for hearing on October 25, 1977, before .th_e Planning Commission at which time the total number of lots would be fixed. The sudden change in number and dimensions of lots and the abruptness of the hearing date simply caught the neighborhood by surprise and they were not really able to properly react. You have to understand here that the neighborhood is made up of a considerably diverse amalgam of individuals and groups. Getting these together and securing the true consensus from them is a time consuming exercise. And, the rapid progression of events here simply prevented the neighborhood from pre- senting their specific concerns. Thus; the mandate of your Board as to "consultation" has really not been properly sat- isfied. Moreover, and perhaps more importantly, the developer has never provided any full explanation,. to the neighborhood as to how he intends tc handle the difficult problems of grading and building on the "problem lots" at this over-all inhospit- able site. The problem lot:; ticre are lots chosen by the planning staff and presumably are those directly in the .major slide areas which exist on this property. We've been advised Microfilmed with board order xO45 J. Page 3 - Board of Supervisors that experts from the County and the developer's staff have gone over the handling of these problem lots and are them- selves that the developer's plans are satisfactory,-'- However, the neighborhood has never been advised of the specifics here and thus, is severely handicapped in making any meaningful "consultation" on this aspect. The handl.in g• of the grading and building issues are perhaps the most significant concerns that the neighborhood has. After all, they're the ones who are going to be 'effected if portions of the hill slide down and block Quandt Road. More- over, they're going to have to live with the resulting eyesore if the development for some reason miscarries. Their concerns, therefore, are real and truly have not been addressed. 2. The neighborhood further contends that the action of the Planning Commission is in error since the site is not physi- cally suited for the nineteen lot development being proposed. in such circumstances, the legislative body of the County does not have the authority to approve the tentative map. Govern- ment Code, Section 66474; Contra Costa County Code, Section 26-2.2404(b) (2) . In this connection the neighborhood is able only to react ac- cording to the information which it has available to it. You will recall in our earlier appeal of April 15, 1977, the neighborhood contended the site is simply too steep and there is too much loose material on it to reasonably suppose that the property can be reconstituted as called for in the de- veloper's soils engineer's report. Some areas have over- 30 feet of loose material on them, and by rough estimate there is over 100,000 cubic yeards of such material which will have to be reconstituted. On the face of this is an inhospitable site. In such case the developer should provide the relevant details to the public so that the plan and proposal can• be properly evaluated. This has not been done and the matter should again be referred to the planning staff and Planning Commission for further hearings. 3. This special site with its special problems clearly re- quires special bonding to secure the public against improper development. It was and is an abuse of discretion to approve the nineteen lots here without requiring as preconditions the providing of bonds by the developer to ensure performance in accordance with the plans and specifications provided by them (at least 5100,000) ; for unforeseen engineering contingencies, (LO% of the ,total project cost) ; and for restoration of the site should the developer abandon or otherwise to complete the project ($150,000) . These bonding were recommended by the neighborhood in their prior appeal and are reasonably required Microfilmed with board order . , Page 4 Board of Supervisors to protect the public against abuse. It was thus an abuse of discretion to fail to require them as preconditions. Contra Costa County Code, Section 26-2.2404(c) (5) . 4. The neighborhood here believes that the "scenic easement" required as a condition by the Planning Commission will not adequately protect the trees which are located at the upper reaches of this property. It's clear that where environmental ' considerations are not properly addressed the Planning Com- mission lacks authority to approve a tentative map. Govern- ment Code, Section 66474(e) ; Contra Costa County Code, Section 26-2.2404 (e) . Condition No. 5 of the "conditions" approved by the Planning Commission provides for a "scenic easement" to be established to protect the grove of trees. These trees, _ incidentally, were apparently planted by the CCC in the 1930's. The problem,however, is that the easement concept is still somewhat ill determined. There aren't adequate answers to many of the significant problems involved, such as who main- tains the easement, who polices the maintenance, and who bears the cost of such. In all, the possible preferred ap- proach would be to require dedication and face the issue of maintenance as a public cost. 5. It was an abuse of discretion to approve the nineteen lots and tentative map without insuring that the developer would correct damage done to existing public improvements (e.q. Quandt Road) and private roadways (e.g. Summit Road) by rea- son of the movement of heavy equipment during the construc- tion phase of the development. Such requirement was recom- mended by the neighborhood to the planning staff and is a reasonable condition. It should thus have been incorporated as a requirement and failure of which is a basis for- reversal of the Planning Commission action. Contra Costa County Code, Section 26-2.2404 (c) (5) . 6. Finally, there appears to have been inadequate consideration given to the requirements of the City of Lafayette in plan- 4ing this nineteen unit development. The site lies within the sphere of influence of the City. The City's ordinances here would permit an estimated ten or less units on this site. Ad- ditionally, they would circumscribe placement and control the design features of the individual units to achieve their specif- ic asthetic goals. It makes little sense for the County to ignore the wishes of the City in this instance. We already have enough examples in the County of non-homogenous development, There's no rea- son to create another. Equally, cooperative planning has been announced as a prospective County policy. There is no better 004.60 Microfilmed wifli board order .Page 5 - Board of Supervisors place to begin than here. Certainly the City supports this, Mr. Marriner, the City Manager, having indicated that they are "not neutral" on- the nineteen lot proposal. There is further and obvious commonality of sentiment among the neighborhood as far as the City of Lafayette is concerned, in fact, there is an annexation election which is presently going on which will determine whether the area is in fact an- nexed to the City. The date for this election is November '15, 1977. Certainly no action should be undertaken at all until the results of this election are known and certified. Based on the foregoing the neighbors. hereby respectfully re quest that the Board reverse the decision of the County Plan- ning Commission on the approval of nineteen lots in this sub- division. The Board should either reduce the number of lots authorized to ten or less which is the number permitted by the City of Lafayette or refer the matter back to the County Plan- ning Commission nor public hearings and for further determin- ation as to appropriate density. Respectfully submitted, WILLIAM J. HOOY, Esq. WJHAa Enclosure 0(1461. Microfilmed with board order 126; Del Arroyo Court DISTRICT 1IMPROVENIENT ASSOCIATION' Lafayette, California YEtlos,tone 4-0355 . - o October 10, 1977- Anthony A. DeHaesus -` Director of Planning Contra Costa County P.O. Box 951 - Martinez, California 94553 re: Subdivision 4$71 Arnico, Inc. Dear Mr, DeHaesus; In response to your request, the following information is furnished to your office for consideration regarding the proposed subdivision for 26 lots on Quandt Road. We fully and unanimously support the comments and questions submitted by the Lafayette Area Planning Cort-3ittee, ' Merle Johnssoz+ Chairman, to your office for consideration. Their paper was also presented to the Quandt District Improvement Association members at their meeting on September 23, 1977_ Additional comments were asked for, and are suremarized be.-LO'.-T. There is a problem concerning what we should respond to. lrnj.;o has represented themselves different ways to different listeners. At the Planning Commission, they spoke in terms of reconstituting the entire hill. To the Board of Supervisors they spoke of driving piles, without needing to massively grade. To the Planning Staff, they repeated their intention to reconstitute the hill. Even* the raps we were presented with in September show different grading plans among them. Our first question. is What are trey really going to do? To date, there have been no answers or solutions tendered in response to the list of problems forsecn by the ne1E:hbors .cf the Quandt dill in reference to the proposed build.in- on that hill by Arnico. Arnico is still trying to force 25 ho fes onto a hill ill-equipped to meet the stress of that much development. The only difference between the original_ Plans of JE."1y and the iDlans as revised and presented in September is the a..IdLt?on of a ,omewhat hazily defined sCerlIC eas:,kner_t CUttin- ciid:•tay across 4-11 development. k'..'- n�ilmed with Sor7ra oraeir 004.62 For Ecl-tcr UnIr.itanrlirnt, incl the Prornutinn of Ql+jccfivc� Con;nue to All -2- Our principal. objection to this development was and continues to be the proposed density. In order to accommodate 26 homes, the hill must be massively removed and re-compacted. The result is a mechanical forcing of a development for the sole purpose of profit, frith insufficient attention to sound building practices, aesthetic impact, or obvious ecological and environmental con- siderations. The addition of a scenic easement midway through the development appears to be an attempt to break the eyesore that this development will be- However, we have some questions about it: 1 ) & will maintain the easement? 2) Assuming each property owner has to maintain a Dort4J.on of the easement, what is to prevent any of them from not raintaining their section of .the easement, if they so choose? 3) Why is there no general mairtainance access to the easement? 4) Uill the homeofiners be allowed to build fences around the area? 5) :That is to prevent each homeowner from fencing off his section of the easement to prevent its deterioration from becoming an eyesore to him? The drainage situation has not been adequately covered. ;that is to happen to the residents of Del Arroyo Court? They will either be ,subject to flooding frith annual regularity, or must suffer :•chile their entire street is torn up so that existing drainage can be improved to accommodate the extra runoff. (It should be noted that extra ru_nof f will be a fact for t ;o reasons: 1, vast amounts of roof and drive-way runoff frn?ch wrould ordin,arlly be abscrbed by the vacent land .-;Ill be channelled underground to encloses, draln3..ge systems emptying onto Del arroyo Court. 2. If the existing shale soil is to be recompacted and replaced then, by admission of tila county soils department, the compacted shale must be kept dry to remain stable. Even more runoff would have to be channelled away from open land and into covered drainage pipas. ) Which aZterr_ati;e do the residents of Del Arroyo Court have to look fors•;ard to? Or is there one we. do not kno:r about? it is unclear exact3y how and where Summit Road is to be widened, and the residents of Swart are understandabiy conoenned about both encroachment into their front yards and their protection from a present flooding hazard. Regarding the frontage on Campo Calle: Hoi .- is a four-foot retaining viall expected to hold and stabilize the new road ,,;hen telephone poles are already leaning due to earth n„ovement? The extensive use of bulkheads not only on Campo Calle home sites but all across the hill appears to be a very forced and un:',ottnd solution to t e P.t.ist- in, problem of two active slides and the 7orescen problem of deems. cuts into the hillside for buil:'iing pads. if t^e incredible number Microfilmed with board order 00463 -3-- of bulk-heads proposed are to be made of redwood for aesthetic purposes, then they will decompose in time--within 10 to 20 years-- and if they are to be constructed of concrete, then the effect of the concrete driveways alongside the concrete bulkheads will be of a concrete jungle in the middle of a rural neighborhood. Fox Ridge Road appears to be planned as a very deep cut into the hill. What 'is to happen above Fox Ridge, where the ground must consequently rise very sharply to compensate for the cut? This Mould appear to beincreasing the slide-prone problem of the hill Instead -of decreasing it. Several things were noticed in regard to the planned homes, themselves. First, it would seem that all the homes fronting on Quandt Road and Campo Calle employ the same floor plan, with some flipped over for an occasional difference. This would increase the^appearance of a cheap tract home area and certainly is not in keeping with the builder's promise of custom homes. Second, it would appear from the architect's sketches of the individual homes that only five models are being used, further giving the distinct appearance of a tract. Third, it would appear that a great many c7T the roofs slope with their ra-jority sections parallel to the hill. This will further the appearance of a concrete jungle, as most of what will be seen from the quandt Road side of the tract will be driveways, bulkheads, and roofs. The point was made by a contractor that should the developers find t'i�nselves r aX:y disuosed to cut costs at the end, they idill plan on tar and gravel and/or store roofs instead of the custom tile or shake which no ; exists in the neighborhood. Fourth, the reliefs of the proposed homes sro;•r a 20' or more elevation difference between the front and rear of most of the homes, requiring large amounts of na::ed siding to be used to cover the discrepancies, giving a "e ack-ar-box" appearance. There is still no plan for the preservation of the existing grova of trees at the top of the hill other than the term "scenic easement, " which r-ay or may not be heeded to various degrees by the homeo:�we-rs. There has been the ass���:o*i ori by the developers all along -hat only 15' feet, give or take a few inches, will have to be removed and compacted at any one point. This is shown on the cross-section mass. ile Trish to emphasize that they have no idea how much cart will actually ha.e to be re-o-,,ed aha co-:,EIcEaa. 1 they find a cost is rroh ibitive half-:,.,ay through the- project, what is to protect the neighbors and the hill from abandonment? When is the developer go?n_; to supply th•e ans:•;ers to these questions? :.1hen is he going to supply tyle addi . soils Microfilmed with board order 00461 -engineering data necessary to determine the extent of landslides and other problems on the site, which has long been considered unbuildable? Both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, at hearings on this subdivision, directed that additional studies be conducted to determine the nature and extent of the soils problems. The developer was to supply detailed plans as to how any such problems would be solved. To date we have received nothing but verbal assurances that the problems will be taken care of--no facts or plans. . Too much is being pushed through too fast. Issues are not being dealt with as they arise. The following are the recommendations of the Quandt District Improvement -Association. 1) We believe that the county proposed minimum of 10 homes Would be much more suitable to this hillside, providing the proper natural sites could be found. The term natural sites would include. areas requiring a minimum of removal and compaction and a minimum use of bulkheads and retaining :,calls, 2) Every effort should be made to design each of the homes individually, as is the normal tray of building on hillsides. The homes should conform to the geology and existing structures in the neighborhood in every way possible tO prevent the current- ly anticipated view of three levels o." three-story homes. 3) There should be the re:�uireme,Zt of a omieo,rners Association with the, express purpose of maintaining and protecting the existing trees and any other designated scenic easements. 4) The developers conform to the bonds requested by our attorney, Fir. Bill ; ooy, as stated in his appeal or. our behalf to the Contra Costa County Board of Super-llsors dated April 15, 1977. although there is a legal bond normally requested of a developer,* we feel that extra bonding be required due to the peculiar circumstances of -this development. This is not a normal development, and nornal bonding will not be suf-ficient It is imperative that Arnico be held legally liable for all effects of its project for a minimum of one year and u.referably longer. Such effects would cover drainage and flooding, road damage by heavy equipment or earth slides, any other damage due to- earth slippage, preservation of the existin,-S trees, and anythirr; else that could have- a significant impact on the existing neighborhood. 5) The developer should be required to plant numerous trees along any designated sc2nic casement of ninimium 15 gallon size. Microfilmed with bocird older We respectfully request your serious consideration of the above proposals from us, as be are taxpayers, neighbors of the proposed development, And concerned citizens. Thank you. Sincerely, Ronald J. Rd4n ickson, president Quandt District. Improvement Association EJB/hf cc:* Planning Commission; Contra Costa County✓ Dill nooy Board of Supervisors., Contra Costa County Arnico, Inc. officers of the Quandt District Improvement Association 11040 K-voiiimed with board order 7 BEFORE THE PLANNING C01•1111551ON OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application for Approval of the Tentative Map of Subdivision [dumber J4871/ WHEREAS, on May 31 , 1977, the Board of Supervisors upheld the decision of the Planning Conunission in approving Subdivision 4371 'with conditions following the hearing on the appeal of the approval of the tentative map by the; t Springbrook Homeowners' Association. WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors assured the applicants that the final decision as to the number of lots will be made by the Director of Planning only after consultation with the neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the County staff met with the developer and his consultants and with the Homeowners' Association; and lIi9EREAS, based on additional information relating to site planning, grading and review with tiie Project Soils Engineer and architects, the Director of Planning has concluded that the site shall be developed for a total of 18 lots. t WHEREAS, these findings were presented-to the Planning Commission during the Planning Conunission study session of October 13, 1977 and the Plan- ning Commission instructed the staff to place the matter on the Planning Commis- sion agenda October 25, 1977 for a public hearing and to review said findings with the residents of tiie area prior to said hearing. WiiEREAS, on October 13, 1977, the applicant submitted a revised tenta- tive map showing a total of 20 lots; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof Laving been given, a public hearing was field by the Planning Cooenission on October 25, 1977, whereat all persons inter- ested therein might appear and be heard; and . rder 004(",7 c,;i:m�Ci with board o , . WHEREAS, the Planning Coimnission having fully considered and evaluated L all the testimony and evidence submitted on this matter; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission modifies the recommendation of the Director of Planning to allow 13 lots and does approv the tentative map for 19 lots. The lot arrangement shall be' similar to the staff .study and the revised map as submitted by the applicant on October 25, 1977, subject to review by the Director of Planning. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing approval was made in the motion of Commissioner Walton, seconded by Connnissioner Young, and adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 1977, by the following vote: AYES: Commissidners Walton, Young, Stoddard, Milano, Anderson. NOES: Commissioner Compagiia. ABSENT: Commissioner Phillips. DONALD E. ANDERSON Chairman of the Planning Commission County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Anthony A. Denaesus Director of Planning . X. Norman L. Halverson 'Chief, Subdivision Administration i NLH:Isw Microfilmed with board order 00468 I, Y U . I i3EFORE THE PLANNING C0111,11SSION OF T!!E COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the -latter of the Application for Approval of the Tentative Nap of Subdivision Number 4371/ WHEREAS, a request by Arnico Inc. (Applicant Owner) for approval of a tentative subdivision reap in an R-20 Zoning District was received by the Plan- ning Department on May 1), 1976; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on :larch 29, 1977, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission having fully. considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted on this matter; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Planning Staff, presented at said public meeting, considered by the Planning Commission during its deliberations and was found to have been complete in compliance with CEQA and State and local guidelines; and WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report for Subdivision 4871 identified the following significant impacts: 1 . The Environmental Impact Report identifies repair and road construc- tion. a. Alteration of topography due to landslide repair and road construction. b. Alteration of a local visual open space due to tree removal and placement of houses in front of and among the remaining trees, thus affecting views from Pleasant [till Road and Route 24. c. ConsLrucLlon of homes on a siLe wiC•.i active landslides in a seismically active region. 2. ' Minor adverse impacts identified it the Environmental ImpacL Report include the increase in traffic, decrease in quality and increase in amount and speed of stone water run-off. Other impacts identified related to loss of grassland habitat for wildlife, decrease in air c?uality, and increase in long-term depaand for electricity, natural gas, and fuel enemy. Microfilmed wish board order ��� b� WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recognizes the above significant impacts and suggests the following mitigating measures: 1 . Grading- for road construction and landslide repair will be done in accordance with the recommendations of a licensed soils engineer and will include surface and subsurface provision for drainage. Stabilization of the land is required prior to construction of the streets and homes for the safety of the new homeowners and will also provide an element of safety to the neighboring proi:erties, which could be affected by a landslide originating on this property. Z. The subdivision pians have been revised from the plan first submit- ted to place the road lower on the hill in order to preserve the trees. 3. Landslides will be stabilized as outlined in "1" above, and earth- quake design will be handled structurally. 4. Applicant will be widening -Quandt Road and Summit Road and providing sidewalks along the subdivision frontage, which will improve ve- hicular and pedestrian safety in that area. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission APPROVES the application of Arnico Inc. for approval of the tentative map of Subdivision 4871 , subject to conditions as listed in Exhibit ".A which is attached hereto and made a part thereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the reasons for the approval are as follows 1. The proposed subdivision is in substantial conformance with the R-20 Zoning District. 2.. The development of this subdivision as. a single-fa-mily residential development is in keeping with the character of the area. 3. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 4. The significant impacts addressed in the Environmental Impact Report cannot be feasibly implemented without greatly altering the pro- posed project which is not warranted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the foregoing approval was r:!ade in the motio of Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Conunissioner Stoddard, and adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of Harch 29, 1977, by the following vote: hlicrorurriera wrh board order 00410 - t AYES: Crmenissioners Stoddard, Phillips, Compaglia, f4itano. NOES: Connissioners Young, Walton. ABSENT: -Corunissioners - None. WILLIM L. MILANO Chairman. of the Planning Connnission County of-Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planning i Porman L. Halverson /Chief, Subdivision Administration - ! t - t t J Microriimed with board ordUm rw'1 EXHIBIT "A" Conditions for Approval of Subdivision 4871 1 . Approval is based on the tentative map received by the Planning Depart- ment on February 28; 1977, as modified by these conditions. The approval is to give direction only. The number of lots may range between 10 and 26, depending .on the next phase of review. 2. The next phase of review shall be the review of the development plan, including grading, drainage, and building location on the lots. During this -period of review the Director of Planning shall consult with the Springbrook Neighborhood Association and may bring the tentative map back -to the Planning Commission for review, if necessary. 3. Exception is granted from the Subdivision Ordinance for Campo Calle to be a private street. Right of access shall be given to the Quandt property. 4. Comply with the fire protection requirements of the Consolidated Fire Protection District. 5. A scenic easement shall be established to protect the grove of trees located on the north portion of the property.' 6. Campo Calle and any other private streets which may be approved shall be eonstructed .to County Ordinance requirements for private roads. Improve- ment plans, inspection fees and bonds shall be submitted to the Building Inspection Department. 7. The subdivision shall conform to the provisions in Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. Any variance therefrom must be specifically applied for and shall - not be allowed unless listed on the Planning Commission's condi- tional approval statement. 8. In accordance with the provisions in Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be dedicated or deeded to Contra Costa County for road purposes shall consent to the -dedication/ deeding of the. right-of-way and shall subordinate their rights to the right of the public in the dedicated/deeded area. 9. All utility transmission, distribution, and service facilities shall be installed underground. 10. Street lights shall be installed on Quandt Road and Summit Road and the entire subdivision shall be annexed to County Service Area L-42 for the maintenance and operation of the street lights. 11 . Sidewalks shall be constructed on Quandt Road and Sunenit Road along the subdivision frontages. 12. No mailboxes will be permitted within sidewalk, path or trail area. The placement of mailboxes within the right-of-tray shall conform to current standards of the Public Works Department. The subdivider is advised to contact the Postal Service and find a satisfactory arrangement for mail delivery. ;.,. �cl with board order 0fl)4._7 2 pions forApproval - Subdivision 4871 Page 2 13. The right-of-way width for Quandt Road shall be 60 feet measured from the existing right-of-way in Subdivisions 2013 and 2447. The face of curb shall be located 10 feet from the widened right-of-way line. 14. The portions of Quandt Road and Summit Road within the subdivision shall be dedicated -to the County. 15. The width of Fox Ridge Lane shall be subject to review and approval by the Staff.. 16.. The returns at the intersection of Quandt Road and Campo Calle Road (private) shall have 10-foot right-of-way radii and 20-foot curb-radii . The centerline of Campo Calle Road (private) shall intersect Quandt Road at a right angle to the tangent of the Quandt Road right-of-way line. 17. All street intersection grades shall be in strict conformance with the provisions of Chapter 98-6 of the Ordinance Code. 1T The subdivider shall replace any existing paving within 20 feet of the curb that does not meet County standards for structural section. 19. Along the roads dedicated to Contra Costa County at least one 3-inth ' diameter non-ferrous drain shall be installed for each lot through the curbs and under the sidewalks to provide for future roof drain, etc. , connections from the individual lots. Locations will- be determined on the basis of grading and road improvement plans. 20. The subdivider's engineer shall submit to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, as part of the improvement plans, a soils report specifically addressing the treatment of slide areas which affect the roads built to public road standards. ' 21. Although the storm drainage system is shown in some detail , comment on the system will not be made until the improvement plans are submitted for review. 22. Storm water flow from the developed portion of any lot shall not be allowed to flow onto adjacent lots in the subdivision or onto adjacent properties. Concrete-lined interception ditches shall be installed, if necessary, to prevent this occurrence. 23. 'Lots 18 through 26 shall be protected from hillside runoff from the north. 24. The existing culvert along the Pleasant Hill• Road frontage at the westerly most corner of the subdivision shall be removed and replaced with concrete- lined ditch to match the existing concrete-lined ditch upstream and down-' stream of the culvert. 25. The right of vehicular access to Pleasant Hill Road shall be relinquished. - Microfilmed with b RAIT ,ons for Approval - Subdivision 4871 Page 3 26. Sewage disposal serving this subdivision shall be provided by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. Each individual living unit shall be served by � separate sewer connection. The sewers located within the boundaries of this subdivision shall become an integral part of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District's sewerage collection system. 27. !Vater supply shall be by the East Say Municipal Utility District. Each individual living unit shall be served by a separate water connection. Such water distribution system, located within the boundaries of this subdivision shall become an integral part of the East Bay Municipal Utility District's overall water distribution sytem. . DP:lsw/dh 3-29-77 Rev. 5/5/77 ••� •with board order . (Nicrotc.n•-� 004'j:I tit . �� . - • !1 /4 - - 16 17 LOCATION MAP ate/ \ .•.. /' ?`�Y�-„ :' t `:'`� '�,�� Na SCAL( f \ f _ ti •" •; 'v "•, ; \a _ _ i r rl t AArhl:r.l AlttO `1 y. .. •. �� / ' ••••• _ �• ..• :.,•, �\' �js'" • A JJy� MIrAIr tr►rRJ:c,c•c•tANIrA#r Aosmcr ,`/ _ `' ' , r •' - - "' _ ''`• •r. . 1 I-•JAKK.r,AJ A1cumtL7 A tWOIY/J/0A•AA1A, /l.tAG � \•., ..... :!/= 4- `�f � �� - •�1•i^•`�:.�' tf; _. A"$&,Atcf!/cl Rl1L ca �` - - / �/ �� N •. _ A vuwll of 11SlorNnAt tors:Z.: ��\� ••..; �� 'ear% x=L" ' .; 'i r r Arar:AwN Lar J/tl:10,000 SOL r T .� •AYr1Atl Lor[/t[�.z+�:r ajo.rr \q v -,..� -✓• �.rj- �Y:/�'j j1 - - t wrsnccs s ixaNr•n,!Oro-fR•n;tc.ev! `� '�*•...• .+ 1 xsr�'= y- ,./ I IL'• r DEVELOPER r/ :` ;, � � • g`!: -_.__•%"iY,E-iy 40*1co arc. l-�+� lL++,,�• `� `' Y M!J lNAwr utCLl r�' , •1L',� Clwt•000,cAt/tal#lA$41" )j - At'PLrcANr .,• (ji► ` /� A011fRr C.,rWIANN 4 �d+rAl "M� f� »,,w 1.�. .. -�•", 'i,'I a0t/lAOrN AvrMit -� '- - 1\_� •--[ s F �.• ^'-✓/^ '(C�� �• LArrr(rrl, CIL/la1NlA lASr! rin.00.6r.6.YCbrlla✓ �� '�-L •. ti `~� - ,� U'Y ' ---- ^ �Nart1JJ!•trlr -- • %s r.:;f,! i?:�Lf SrC'P'iG/J `�G.'rx �.�.. " .��� •, :.,� -• �� �r �._ LEGEND ro s r -�N,�' i L!. 7 TENWIVE PLAN •t".r.f l!r+�r Gd:/v..i!•.moi:Ind}• f "`�_ ���• �t .' .(. ANO PRELIMINARY GRAD/NG PLAN A C•._..,� l'r.A/linq i•�r-j1 p I y, S' �:.K••• ..�' ..•.-...�: f!•.»aw�� .61a••n+ 1?i>•n t:.le••1• ...�,y t/ '�%..:w��1 r •Jrlj �• SUBDIVISION 4,871 �rwAamse o rn Gro..l/nN•- ✓: ` '`• '••, I� %+ A PORTION OF RANCHO CANADA DEL IrAMONA ^r" f-u r Gc,Yrw nT'r'7" E,•sf S�•ccca-camp �r-��s- I r } i ...<..,: � .,, �.• ' /�f' G`QNTRC �N7-Y L IFQRNlA L. .•e t _ ., / r ��' ` .�-.---q --141 C N4YANANG N CO LJYRY(r!A•�•Ch4(XGlN(rR7N4 �'�• !. dC ...-...�i �o art G t`L P._� l.t- ♦ . /r : s_ , r `-' -~}- _ ':_ _ _--•1 1 Ia?/IIOYN AY(MYr �� .• _ .z ,..,�. J.-er. •It l'�J. _ _ s;.-_- - u 1 rr.CALIrc++N/A n.sACdn � .rrwt , / 1 tQ ~ SCALE,/ AMC M 976 - AY / r.n r~y'\�:•- J -`�� �!n •!+�"�"`�-^-�.�. .!• � *ice ir_.�.."_.y �::s. � •\ } i... -t:. rt...� t. Ir, an• •PJCJlrM s-��� ,�♦ •e.A:Alt yt..L -.. ..• ':.rs`:1a. .»r:rA w C� � , 'y,{.• '•`�•/��/` .wnl .� ,/eye' ) .r /^•y/t�.A�^1 •7�i//C'.G.g L. 4:•i' fA,�.V +mow_ �•' l��lt4{� .-1.�L.�Y�� ��?l�/•�- _,- _«L:- 5��s.�� l�Y�+jY.'�L� � tYtfTii`'�r_ `f -_i C.K='i s.•S.Y.✓iw• •� (��,�1TE ,���✓4�� ^_'-__C.:+n�1.'1" �r�.�� .. N.:i Sra:w�e' � .:. A A4& Sca+/ir Alm icon! tares fVIA, G "'" Microfilmed with board ord&. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of CLAIM FOR LOSS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY Pursuant to County Ordinance Code Section 36-8.1604, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to reimburse James D. Matheron, Group Counsellor, Juvenile Hall, in the sum of $78 for replacement of prescription eyeglasses lost in the line of duty. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. f Witness my hand and the Seal of the Booid of cc: Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this29th day of November_____, 19 -77 Civil Service -- Attn: Safety Dept. Probation Department ✓ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Attn: N. Donavan, Jr. BOeputy Clerk y Maxine M. Net d 004'76 H.24 3/76 15m 1 in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 2 9 ]977 • 19 In the Matter of CLAIM FOR LOSS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY PURSUANT to County Ordinance Code Section 36-8.1604, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to reimnurse Deputy Sheritt Larry Tannehill the sum of $49.001for the loss of personal property (eye glasses) incurred in the line of duty. PASSEb by the Board NOV 2 9 19771 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Count Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Sherif-Coroner Supervisors NOV 2 9 1977 Auditor-Controller affixed this day of 19 Sgt. Larry Tannehill — J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B V,ez Deputy Clerk e M.Nsuiald tl Uepuiy Clerk 004147 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California iyOV 2 9 1977 0 19 In the Matter of ` Termination of Emergency Foster Home Program Agreement #20-170 with Donna Long The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency,regarding the action taken by the County Social Service Department to terminate Emergency Foster Home Program Agreement #20-170 (term: October 1 , 1977, through September 30, 1978) with Donna Long (foster parent), as set forth in the•letter (termination notice) sent to Mrs. Long by Mrs. Penny James (Licensing Social Worker), dated November 8, 1977 (copy attached hereto for reference, thereby terminating said Agreement effective November 22, 1977; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the-termination of said Emergency Foster Home Program Agreement #20-170 with Mrs. Donna B. Long is hereby APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on NOV 2 9 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors . NQy 2 9 1977 cc: County Administrator affixed this day of 19 County Auditor-Controller County Welfare Director / J. R. OLSSON. Clerk Deputy Clerk RJP:gm Q H-24 4/77 15m 00478 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Nov 2 9 1977 , 19 — In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at a Study of Joint Funding Programs On the recommendation of the County Administrator and the Director, Human Resources Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the person listed below is AUTHORIZED to attend a Field Trip to study the Joint Funding programs in Fresno, California, December 5-6, 1977. Expenses to be charged to the Human Resources Agency, Human Services Advisory Commission. Roger Tumbaga, Chairman Joint Funding Subcommittee of the Human Services Advisory Commission PASSED BY THE BOARD on NOV 2 9 1977 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Roger Tumbaga, HSAC Supervisors County Administrator affixed this day of NOV 2 9 1977 . 19 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By > Deputy Clerk Robbi ufierrez TM:gm 1 141 J H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 19 77 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meetings IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the person listed below is AUTHORIZED to attend the following meeting, charges to be at COUNTY expense unless otherwise indicated: NAME & DEPARTMENT MEETING DATE R. E. Jornlin, Director APWA National Round Table December 5, 1977 to Social Service Conference in Washington, December 9, 1977 D. C. PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 29, 1977• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Orig: Director, HRA Supervisors cc: Director, Social Service Employee named affixed this 29thday of_November 19 77 County Administrator County Auditor-Controller '7 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L1 - Deputy Clerk 99 Ro bie Gut rrez 00480 H-24 3/76 15m • •t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NOV 291977 , 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meeting IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the person listed below is AUTHORIZED to attend the following meeting, charges to be at County expense: NAME & DEPARTMENT MEETING DATE Jonna Stratton National Drug Abuse Conference April 3-8, 1978 Medical Services Seattle, WA PASSED BY THE BOARD on NO V 2 9 1977, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Director, HRA Supervisors CC: Medical Director affixed this of N 0 V `? 9 1Q77 19 J. Stratton County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor- By Robbie:uier' rDeputy Clerk Controller 004161 H 24 8/75 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 November 29 _, 19 77 In the Matter of Authorizing the Engineer ex officio to execute all documents necessary for the District to obtain a Clean Water Grant from the State and Federal Governments. W.O. 5418-0927 IT IS .BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director, as Engineer ex officio of District No. 5, is hereby AUTHORIZED to execute all documents necessary for the District to obtain a Clean Water Grant from the State and Federal governments for the purpose of financing a study to investigate possible wastewater treatment alternatives to enable the District to comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 .(P..L. 92-500).. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ORIGINATOR: Public Works Department Supervisor Environmental Control affixed this 29thday of November 193 cc: Public Works Director Environmental Control J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Citizens' Advisory Committee By_ Deputy Clerk N. Fous H-24 4/77 15m 00482 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 . 19 77 In the Matter of Authorization for Implementation of additional new CETA Title VI Public Service Employment Projects IN ACCORDANCE with the policies and procedures established by the Board for the operation of CETA Title VI projects pursuant to the Board Order of August 16, 1977; and IN ACCORDANCE with the recommendations of the Manpower Advisory Council Public Service Employment Committee that County government be authorized to establish additional CETA Title VI projects in order to spend the awarded allo- cation from the U. S. Department of Labor in a timely fashion; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following CETA Title VI projects be added to those operated by County government and that said projects be implemen- ted immediately to operate until September 30, 1978, contingent on further funding by the U. S. Department of Labor: Project # Department # Positions Classification 66 Public Defender 1 Human Service Worker I-CETA 67 District Attorney 2 District Attorney Aide-CETA 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA 68 District Attorney 4 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA 69 District Attorney 4 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA 70 Probation 1 Probation Aide-CETA 71 Probation 1 Probation Aide-CETA 72 Probation 2 Probation Aide-CETA 73 Planning 1 Clerk-CETA 74 Planning 3 Clerk-CETA 75. Office of Economic Opportunity 3 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA 76 Sheriff/Coroner 1 Storeroom Clerk 77. Sheriff/Coroner 1 Telephone Operator Trainee- CETA 78 Public Works 2 Public Service Worker II-CETA 79 Public Works 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA 80 Public Works 6 Public Service Worker I-CETA 34 PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori g- Civil Service Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors Attn: G. Brown affixed this,22th day of November _ 19 77 Director of Personnel (PSE Office) Attn: R. Hagstrom Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Attn: G. Gross By - --u- - �� , Deputy Clerk G. Miller Jeanne 0. Maglio 00483 H-24 3/76 15m 1 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: ) vc Civil Service Department Department Pudic Service EmplgTment Budget Unit 581 Date 11/22/77 Action Requested: Classify (34) positions as per attached lists AND allocate to Exempt Salary Schedule the class of Telephone Operator Trainee-CETA. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: CETA Public Service Employment Adjustments necessaKX to implement FY 77-78 program plan. Contra Costa County Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEIVED amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: 140V 2 2 1977 $ 2. Fixed Assets: (ZQ6t items and coat) Office „f CGi "`" ft ,istrator Estimated to $ Signature for/ Department HeW Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: _ 11/22/77 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class o Telephone Operator Trainee-CETA to the Exempt Salary Schedule and classi y 34 positions, per attached list. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 77/602, Salary Schedule for Exempt Personnel, by adding the class of Telephone Operator Trainee-CETA, 1977/78 Salary Level 178 (634-771), 1978/79 level 194 (666-809); also amend Resolution 71117 to reflect the addition of 34 positions per attached list. for/ Personnel irer Recommendation of County Administrator Date: m er 2R , 1977 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective November 30, •1977. County AdministrAtor Action of the Board of Supervisors N O V 2 9 1977 Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: NOV 2 9 1977 By: Lq- APPROVAL 06 .th,iz adjustment eonzt tutea all APPUPtiation Adjustment and Peuonnee Reaotution Amendmemt. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mwt be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00484 .t ADDITIONS CETA VI - 581 No. Positions Classification Salary Level Department 1 Human Service Worker I - CETA 18OT(703-775 Public Defender 2 District Attorney Aide - CETA 246 (780-948) District Attorney 9 Typist Clerk Trainee - CETA 178 (634-771) '• 4 Probation Aide - CETA 267 (832-1011) Probation 4 Clerk - CETA 178 (634-771) Planning 3 Typist Clerk Trainee - CETA 178 (634-771) Economic Opportunity 2 Public Services Worker II - CETA 246T(860-948) Public Works 6* Public Services Worker I - CETA 209T(768-847) '• 1 Typist Clerk Trainee - CETA 178 (634-771) it 1 : Telephone Operator Trainee - CETA 77/78178 (634-771) Sheriff-Coroner 78/79194 (666-809) 1 Storeroom Clerk - CETA 279 (863-1049) 34 Total 0.0485 C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , iq 77 In the Molter of _ Conciliation Agreement - .Vaughan and Brunt .As recommended by the Director of Personnel and County Counsel, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement claims are approved, and the Director of Personnel is AUTHORIZED TO execute an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Conciliation Agreement with respect thereto: Patsy Vaughan $732.00 Ora Brunt $913.00 PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this29th day of November . 19 37 Orig: Administrator cc: Director of Personnela J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Auditor-Controller B Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufdid 004.86 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 19 77 In tfie Matter of Suggestion .•with respect to Fosters concerning Speed and 1,7a'{e, Bethel Island Area. The Board having received a Nover'ber 17, 1977 letter from Mr. Charles L. Butler, Chairman, Bethel Island Area Citizens Group for Boating Safety and Law Enforcement, suggesting that in addition to replacement and installation of speed signs in Delta water_ways, posters concerning boat speed and wa}:e be placed in various business locations; IT IS BY THE BOARD OPDEP,ED that the aforesaid suggestion is REFERRED to the County Sheriff-Coroner. PASSED by the Board on November 29, 1977. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: TTr. C_ L. Butler Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of P.O. Box 305 Supervisors Bet1:^1 Island, CA .94511 affixed this 29th day of November 1977 .County Sheriff-Coroner County Counsel County Administrator �` �,, ,J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. T!e 1 en C_ Ma rc'j a t 1 , Deputy Clerk H-24 4177 15m • • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 29 , 1977 In the Motter of Budget Study Session. The Board at 2 p.m. this day held a budget study session. The County Administrator informed the Board on alternative approaches to budgeting, the program budgeting process being developed for Contra Costa County, and budget techniques and developments which may be applied in the future. The meeting concluded at 3:30 p.m. THIS IS A MATTER FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY matter of record I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of cd%Kdw entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 29th doy of Ne%=mh&-" , 19?Z J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 1' c Deputy Clerk Mary aig H-24 4177 15m And the Board adjourns to meet on at 1:0 in the Board Chambers, Room 107, County Administration Building, Martinez, California. W. N. Boggess, Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Deputy SUIOMY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COIuTRA COSTA COUNTY, NOVEMBER 29, 1977, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for Probation, Public Works, Sheriff-Coroner, County Administrator, Civil Service, Medical Services, classified 34 CETA Title VI project positions, and allocated the Class of Telephone Operator Trainee-CETA to Exempt Salary Schedule. Authorized attendance at meetings as follows: J. Stratton, Medical Services, to National Drug Abuse Conference in Seattle, WA., Apr. 3-8; R. Jornlin, Social Service, to APWA National Conference in Washington, D.C. , Dec. 5-9; R. Tumbaga, Human Services Advisory Commission, to Joint Funding Pro- grams Study in Fresno, CA, Dec. 5-6. Approved appropriation adjustments for District Attorney, Planning, Sheriff' s Radio Facilities, Riverview Fire Protection District and internal adjustments not affecting totals for Delta Municipal Court, County Adminis- tration, and Probation; and adjustments of 1976-77 appropriations of various departments and districts in accordance with reported final expendi- tures. Approved Traffic Resolution No. 2400. Introduced ordinance amending the Code to provide exemption of the position of Public Information Assistant and fixed Dec. 6 for adoption. Authorized Public Works Department to negotiate for additional space for the Law and Justice Systems Development Project in Concord. Denied claim for damages filed by S. Smyers and application of E. Cleveland for permission to present a late claim. Approved additional funding for Third Year Community Development Activity #40. Authorized Director of Personnel to execute an equal Employment oppor- tunity Commission Conciliation Agreement with respect to P. Vaughan and 0. Brunt. Accepted resignation of T. Mosca from the Community Development Advisory Council and authorized issuance of Certificate of Appreciation for her services. Accepted resignation of W. Smith from the Manpower Advisory Council and appointed H. W. Griggs, Jr. to the Community Development Advisory Council. Adopted Ordinance No. 77-114 amending the Code with respect to salary of employees who voluntarily demote and mileage compensation for employees using their private automobiles for county business. Authorized reimbursement to L. Tannehill and J. Matheron for loss of personal property incurred in the line of duty. ()4 id yU November 29, 1977 Summary, continued Page 2 Approved termination of emergency Foster Home Program Agreement with D. Long. Approved proposal by the City of Walnut Creek to proceed with appraisal and negotiations to acquire property for park purposes, CSA R-8. Accepted instruments from J. Papini, et al, in connection with MS 163-75 and Offers of Dedication for recording only from Blackhawk Development Co. (Sub. 4963) , Frank' s Marina, Inc. (LUP 2197-75) , T. Cutino, et al, (Sub 4922) , J. Papini, et al, (MS 163-75) and E. Lasell, Jr. , et al, (MS 27-77) . Acknowledged report from Public Works Director outlining water conser- vation efforts within his department' s operations. Referred to County Administrator letter from Sheriff-Coroner re proposed separation of Sheriff-Coroner functions. As the governing board of the County and all fire districts of which the Board is the ex-officio governing board, approved. amendments to existing Inspection Services Contracts for J. M. Nelson, R. Grady, L. R. Cameron, and R. Soto and authorized Public Works Director to -execute same. Fixed Dec. 13 at 2:30 p.m. for hearing on appeal of C. Zocchi and Beacon Points Associates for establishment of a multiple group development in the Walnut Creek area. Acknowledged receipt of official statement from County Clerk of votes cast on Nov. 8, 1977 for the Maximum Tax Rate for Zone No. 1, Byron Fire Protection District. Approved Addendums Nos. 2 and 3 in connection with the Detention Facility (Martinez) Plumbing and Electrical Projects, respectively. Authorized Chairman to execute a Certificate of Appreciation to E. Scott in grateful acknowledgement of 40 years of dedicated service in the interest of children and their families. As Ex-Officio the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, authorized Public Works Director, as Engineer Ex-Officio of District, to execute all documents necessary for the District (Port :Costa area) to obtain a Clean Water Grant from the State and Federal Governments. Fixed Dec. 13 at 2 p.m. for hearing on appeal of Quandt District Improvement Association et al from Planning Commission approval of tentative map for Sub. 4871, Lafayette area. As Ex-Officio the Board of Supervisors of County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorized Chairman to execute, on behalf of the District, a Grant of Easement for use as a roadway for vehicles, pedestrians and animals to W. , M. , and P. Maggiora. Approved recommendation of Public Works Director for revision of plans and specifications for construction of the Kitchen/Dining Hall Facility at the Sheriff' s Rehabilitation Center, Clayton, and directed him to readvertise for bids. 00T - November 29, 1977 Summary, continued Page 3 Awarded contract for Detention Facility Precast Concrete Project, (Martinez) to Basalt Rock Co. Fixed Dec. 27 at 11:15 a.m. for hearing on appeal of R. Amador (LUP 2061-77) from Board of Appeals denial of application for approval of establishment of a mobile home for family member. Fixed Dec. 27 at 11:30 and 11:35 a.m. , respectively, for hearings on recommendation of Planning Commission with respect to requests of J. Henan (2138-RZ) and W. Schlosser (2133-RZ) to rezone land in the Pacheco and Danville areas. Approved recommendation of Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee for release of certain Park Dedication Trust Fluids to the Kensington Community Service District to develop a children's play area. Denied appeal of. Round Hill Property Owners Association, Inc. from Planning Commission conditional approval of tentative map of Sub: 4915 (Elbaco, Inc. , applicant) , Alamo area. As Ex-Officio- the Governing Board of the County Fire Protection District, referred to Fire Chief and County Administrator bid proposals received for provision of weed abatement services. Granted appeal of Kay Building Co. and Danville Station Homeowners Association from Planning Commission denial of application to gain approval of Findal Development Plan 3032-77, Danville area. Referred to Sheriff-Coroner suggestion from Bethel Island Area Citizens Group for Boating Safety and Law Enforcement with respect to posters con- cerning speed and wake. Referred to Finance Committee (Supervisors R. I. Schroder and J. P. Kenny) recommendation of Director of Personnel that Board adopt a resolu- tion indicating intent to participate in the CSAC cooperative program for administration of unemployment insurance. Authorized Chairman to execute: Child Care Contract with YWCA for provision of child day care services for children of AFDC recipients enrolled in WIN training programs; Contract with Intergovernmental Management Development Institute to provide training needs study for Area Office on Aging; Contract extension with Martinez Bus Lines,. Inc. for continuation of workshop transportation services for mentally retarded; Contract with Association for the Mentally Retarded, Inc. for provision of activity workshop services for mentally retarded adults; Lease renewal with R. Barrett for continued use of premises in Lafayette by the Public Works Department for communication equipment used at the Lafayette Corporation Yard; Five-year agreement with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District for premises at Kregor Peak Communications Site. Acknowledged receipt of Progress Report from Director, Human Resources Agency, on impact of continued drought on Social Service operations. Acknowledgedreceipt of preliminary report of the Director, Human Re- sources Agency, and authorize staff to proceed as rapidly as possible with further actions toward emplementation of the Family Stress Center Program. 00492 November 29, 1977 Summary, continued Page 4 As Ex-Officio the Governing Board of County Fire Protection District, authorized Public Works Director to execute First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services with J. Wilson for design of the Remodeling of Classrooms at Fire College and Remodeling of Station No. 8 in Concord. Authorized Public Works Director to execute: Inspection Services Contract with R. Grady for contract documents review and construction inspection services for the Detention Facility Pro- ject, Martinez; Consulting Services Agreement with Richard Splenda and Assoc. of Richmond for landscape design at Women's Minimum Security/Work Education Furlough Center; Consulting Services Agreement with F. Bellecci for a topographic survey at the proposed County Health Clinic site in Oakley; . Rental Agreement for County-owned property at .Castle Rock Road, Walnut Creek, with B. Musolf and N. Cutshall; Deed and Right of Way Contract from Mt. Diablo Unified. School District for property acquisition, Center Avenue Project, Pacheco area. Fixed Jan. 3 at 11 a.m. for hearing on Planning Commission recommen- dation with respect to proposed amendment of the Subdivision Ordinance (repeal of Title 9 and reenactment of same in amended form). Approved recommendation of Health Officer and Public ',forks Director that R. Mygrant be granted a permit to install a sewage treatment facility to serve the Lazy M. Marina, Byron area, subject to proper operating procedures. Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 77/976, accepting as complete contract with Antioch Paving Co. , Inc. for repair of base failures and placement of asphalt concrete overlay on Hillcrest Ave. , Antioch area; 77/977, accepting as complete improvements in Sub. 4620, Danville area; 77/978, as Ex-Officio the Board of Supervisors of County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, fixing Dec. 20at 10:55 a.m. as time to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Adopt Resolution of Necessity to acquire real property by eminent domain for Green Valley Creek, Danville area; 77/979, fixing Dec. 20 at 11 a.m. as time to consider the adoption of a Resolution of Intention to adopt a Resolution of Necessity to condemn property needed for Clear Zone easements in connection with improvement of the instrument landing system for Runway 19-R, Buchanan Field, Concord area; 77/980, consummating purchase and accepting deed of R. Moore property, Martinez, County Civic Center; 77/981, approving proposed Sub. 4952 Annexation (San Ramon area) to CSA Id-22; 77/982, authorizing Auditor to cancel redemption penalty and fee on 1976-77 secured assessment roll; 77/983, authorizing City of Concord to inspect buildings in connection with proposed Cook Annexation; 77/984, approving rate increase and modification of rate setting pro- cedure for Concord TV Cable; 77/985, As Ex-Officio the Governing Board of County Sanitation District No. 15, approving Resolution of Intention to adopt Resolution of Necessity to acquire certain real property in the Bethel Island area by eminent domain. 00493 November 29, 1977 Summary, continued Page 5 Referred to Director, Human Resources Agency, request from Los Medanos College for increased funding of the Emergency Medical Services Program. Approved increased -rates for ambulance services effective Nov. 1, 1977, payment of said rates subject to compliance of all terms and conditions of the ambulance agreements executed between the County and the individual ambulance companies. As recommended by the Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden) ordered the Director, Human Resources Agency, to explore the possibility of using CETA funds to provide: (a) Increased training for In-Home Care Providers and (b) In-Home Care services to certain recipients who are presently ineligible for same; and requested County Counsel to periodically report on the status of a suit against the State on this matter. Referred to Director, Human Resources Agency, letter from U. S. Department of Labor urging prime sponsors to reassess and reprogram funds to enable the CETA Public Service Employment program to reach established goals.