Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 11301976 - R 76K IN 2
1976 NOVEMBER TUESDAY _ THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1976 I11 ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMIA ISTRATION BUILDING, MARTVIEZ, C ALIFORA IA. PRESEAT: Chairman J. P. Kenny, presiding; Supervisors J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor A. M. Dias. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator and Public Works Director. Q0M JAMES P.KENNY.RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P KENNY IST DISTRICTCONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.OIAS,EL SOBRANTE EDMUND A UNSCH EID 2ND DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E.MORIARTY.LAFArETTE AND FOR JAMES R OLSSON.COUNTY CLERK 3Ro DISTRICT SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD AND EA OFFK70 CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT BOARD CHAMBERS-ROOM 107•ADMINISTRATION SUKDING CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A LINSCHEIO.PITTSBURG rO BOK 911 PHONE(415)372.2371 5TH DISTRICT MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY NOVEMBER 30, 1976 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees. 9:45 A.M. Service Pin Awards. 9:45 A.M. Recess. Hearings on the following Planning Commission initiated rezoning applications: 10:30 A.M. 2034-RZ, San Ramon area; and 10:35 A.M. 2036-RZ, Saranap area. If the aforesaid applications are approved as recommended, introduce ordinances, waive reading thereof, and fix December 7, 1976 for adoption. 10:40 A.M. As Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District hold hearing on proposed condemnation of certain real property in the Brentwood area required for a public improvement (Lines E and E-1, Marsh Creek). 10:45 A.M. Hearing on appeal of Miss Shirley Calhoun from administrative decision related to request for an evidentiary hearing on General Assistance benefits. 11:00 A.M. Decision on appeal of Mr. George Ruckstuhl, Jr. , from Board of Appeals approval of Variance Permit Application No. 1043-76, Oak View Memorial Park Cemetery, applicant, Antioch area (hearing closed November 23, 1976). 11:05 A.M. Consider comments by Mr. Larry Elizarde, Economic Opportunity Executive Council Board Member. ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 6 : CONSENT 1. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll. 2. EXONERATE bond deposited as surety for taxes in connection with Subdivision 4843, City of Walnut Creek. . Qt" Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued November 30,1976 3. ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of official canvass of votes cast in the _November 2, 1976 election for County Service Area R-9 Maximum Tax Rate; City-County Thoroughfare Systemi incor- poration of San Ramon Valley; Moraga School District Revenue Limit Increase; and Jail Initiative Measure. 4. FIX December 28, 1976 at the times indicated for hearings on the following Planning Commission initiated rezoning applications: 10:30 a.m. 2044-RZ, Concord area; 10:30 a.m. 2050-RZ, Antioch area; 10:35 a.m. 2051-RZ, Oakley area; and 10:35 a.m. 2052-RZ, Bethel Island area. S. AUTHORIZE legal defense for the County Treasurer-Tax Collector in connection with United States District Court Action Number C76-210-CFP. 6. DENY the application of Leonard Colbert for leave to present a late claim. Items 7 - 10: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item.) 7. MEMORANDUM from Director of Planning responding to Board referral of request of Albert D. Seeno Construction Company for partial refund of park dedication fees paid in connection with development of Subdivision 4172, San Ramon area, and advising that a refund for at least four lots should be allowed. FIX TIME TO CONSIDER AMOUNT OF PARK DEDICATION FEE REFUND 8. INTRODUCE and consider ordinance amending the Ordinance Code with respect to increasing fees and penalties collected for impounded animals. WAIVE READING AND FIX DECEMBER 7, 1976 FOR ADOPTION 9. LETTER from Secretary, Reclamation District No. 799, advising that Mr. Cyril A. Billeci has resigned as a trustee of said district and transmitting names of three nominees for appoint- ment consideration. ACCEPT RESIGNATION 10. LETTER from Executive Officer, California Regional Water Quality Control Board--Central Valley Region, transmitting outline of recommended scope of work for a countywide septage study, and inviting comments or suggestions thereon prior to December 10, 1976. REFER TO COUNTY HEALTH OFFICER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL) Items 11 = 16: INFORMATION (Copies of communications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 11. COMMUNICATIONS from various cities advising of action on November 1976 draft of the County Solid Waste Management Plan as follows: 1. Hercules City Council approved; 2. San Pablo City Council approved; 3. ',1alnut Creek City Council approved; and 4. E1 Cerrito City Council disapproved. _A j -J '=e0��N� �r r' jBoard of Supervisors' Calendar, continued November 30, 1976 12. NOTICE from East Bay Regional Park District of public hearing to be held in Richmond on December 17, 1976 pertaining to the Brooks Island Natural Resource Management Plan. 13. LETTER from Mrs. Alice Johnson, Lafayette, expressing concern with respect to the county budget for children's services generally and mental health services for children specifically. 14. MEMORANDUM report submitted by County Administrator relating to 1976 Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth. 15. LETTER from Senior Vice President, Bank of America, transmitting annual publication detailing the wide variety of the bank's social policy activities, educational and community involve- ments. 16. MEMORANDUM from Associate Planner, Sacramento Regional Area Planning Commission, transmitting Fourth Annual Report of the Delta Advisory Planning Council for fiscal year 1975- 1976. Persons addressine the Board should complete the form provided on the rostrum and furnish the Clerk with a written copy of their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF P=C INTEREST (For additional information please phone the number indicated) San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission 1st and 3rd Thursdays of the month - phone 557-3686 Association of Bay Area Governments 3rd Thursday of the month - phone 841-9730 East Bay Regional Park District 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of the month - phone 531-9300 Bay Area Air Pollution Control District 1st Wednesday of the month - phone 771-6000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission 4th Wednesday of the month - phone 849-3223 Contra Costa County Water District 1st and 3rd Wednesdays of the month; study sessions all other Wednesdays - phone 682-5950 i i OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions November 30, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, County Atiministrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To Assessor 016 Intermediate Assessment Typist Clerk, Services Clerk 401, 402, 406 Auditor- 011 Program Analyst- Senior Program Controller EDP, 402, Y03, Analyst-EDP 405 Oil Programmer II, Systems Software :02, 405 Analyst Human 180 Department Administrative Resources Systems Services Specialist, Assistant III 401 Probation 308 Senior Clerk, Supervising 404 Clerk I 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation County Clerk 240 Administrative Senior Clerk, 40l Services Assistant III, Medical 540 Licensed Morgue Attendant, Services Vocational Zol Nurse 540 Clerk Account Clerk III, a02 Probation 327 Per-manent Permanent Intermittent Intermittent Deputy Probation Group Counsellor Officer 1, 17801 T 00005 l� TO: Board Of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-30-76 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS - continued 2. Additions and cancellation of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Recorder 355 Keypunch Intermediate Operator Typist Clerk, i01 Sheriff- 255 -- Sergeant, #48, #11, Coroner 257 #49 055 -- Communications Technician, #07 Social 501 Children's 20/40 Social Work Service Services Program Supervisor III, #01 Specialist 3. Decrease hours of positions as follows: Cost • Department Center From To Social 501 40/40 Social 32/40 Social Work Service 505 Work Practi- Practitioner II tioner II, 4202, =45 II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 4. Name and Destination Department and Date Meeting William A. Portland, Oregon Asphalt Users Garrison, 12-7-76 to 12-9-76 Technical Public Works Conference Gerald T. Evans, Same Same Public Works III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 5. County Library. Add $8,259 from Reserve for Contingencies- County Library for audio visual materials. 6. Public Works Denartment (Count " Service Area R-6, Orinda) . A 440 from service area tunds tor replacement of stolen equipment. 00006 VVVva1 F.x rFRPMTow u " '.F To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-30-76 Page: 3. III. APPROPRLATION ADJIISTtiE�XTS - continued 7. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for following budget units: Auditor-Controller, Probation, Public Works (Engineering & Administration, Sewage, Waste and Water, Sanitary Services) , Human Resources, County Administrator (Plant Acquisition, Game Protection) . FV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS None. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACE,%LF'NTS/RATES 8. Amend Resolution No. 76/1034 to provide the Probation Department with authority to establish 20 emergency foster home beds at the subsidized rate of $50 per bed, not to exceed $150 per home for each month, at the established ner diem rate. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRIANTS 9. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Richard L. Sweet, Health Depart- $150 11-22-76 M.D. ment staff training Tommy C. Prepare EIR $3,200* 11-23-76 Angrove and for Subdivision to Associates No. 4879 5-6-77 *(advanced by developer) International Supplement to $201 12-22-76 Business Amended License monthly Machines, Inc. Agreements for IB,K Products International Same $43 12-1-76 Business monthly Machines, Inc. City of Second year $95,'000 11-3-76 Martinez Community to Development 6-30-77 Program 0004( ��� e To: Board of Sjpervisor5 From-. County Ad=inistratO= -76. Re: Recommence_ Actions 11-30 Page: 4. VI. CONTRACTS t_\-D. GRUti7S - continued 9. Approve and authori2e Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period James A. Austin Evaluation of Not to 11-1-76 Following exceed to Probation $20,000* 2-28-78 Department projects: Open Space, Community Detention, and Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion. * (90% Federal funds) 10. Annrove and authOrize County Health Officer to execute Standard Form contract on behalf of County with one subcontractor (hos-pital) for participation in the National Influenza Program of 1976 (Swine Flu Immunization) under California G--vernment Code Section 856.6 (the contract involves no PaY-_-'en*= by County) . VII. LEGISLATION None. VIII.REAL ESTATE ACTIO'NS 11. Approve and authorize the County Principal Real Property Agent to sign relccation assistance claims and authorize the- County Auditor-Controller to issue warrants to be delivered by Real Property for: 1. Joseph A. Kenny $35 2. A. E. Haycraft $215 Relocation assistance results from County acquisition of property for county Civic Center purposes. 12. Refer to Administration and Finance Committee for review request of Riverview Fire Protection District for acquisition of 12 acres of State surplus prOperty for development of administration and training center. „4`...rr rri .,. Mr?r... •1 ....;r4!.,; .. .. ;:o. ... ,,:-, '. '..r..... 'S 7' .RS .., .. .Y-: ., n..-.. n w.. .. .. s To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-30-76 Page: 5. IX. OTHER ACTIONS 13. Authorize reimbursement of $47 to Deputy Sheriff Gregory W. Moore for damage to personal property incurred in the line of duty. 14. Authorize transfer of $151,541.50 from the Parkland Dedication Fund to County Service Area R-8 for acquisition of a 3.74 acre parcel for a neighborhood park in the Walden area, as recommended by Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee. 15. As recommended by the County Probation Department, authorize Contra Costa Community College District to use Probation Training Center - Stanwell Drive, Concord for Criminal Justice Training during the period of October 27, 1976 through January 23, 1979. 16. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to approve submission of a proposal to the State Office of Economic Opportunity, requesting $24,000 for weatherization material to compliment the existing County Housing Rehabilitation Program, as recommended by the Economic Opportunity Council. 17. Approve membership of the Fii-American Association on the Economic Opportunity Council to fill the Class III seat vacated by the Council of Churches, as recommended by _ the Economic Opportunity Council. 18. Acknowledge receipt and refer to the Administration and Finance Committee for review memorandum from County Administrator regarding the discontinuation of Federal funding for the Community Food and Nutrition Project. 19. Adopt a resolution establishing the Animal Control Center Volunteer Program. 20. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum dated November 23, 1976 from C. L. Van Marter, Human Resources Director, relating �. to social services funding problems and fix time for Board consideration. 00009 SIA M To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 11-30-76 Page: 6. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 21. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to make payment to San Damiano Retreat Center for use of facilities for management training program during the period December 1 - 2, 1976. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA IMMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 P.M. 00010 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California November 30, 1976 EXTRA BUSINESS GENERAL Item 1. BUCHANAN FIELD - FIXED BASE OPERATION LEASE It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the following actions regarding the Fixed Base Operator's Lease between the County, as Lessor, and Navajo Aviation, Inc., as Lessee: A. Approve an increase in the Base Ground Rent from $2,148.00 per year ($179 per month) to $2,700.00 per year ($225 per month) effective January 1, 1977. The increase is in accordance with the rental terms of the original lease, dated December 19, 1961, for revaluation of the ground rent every 5 years and represents the maximum allowable increase of 25% for the 5-year period. B. Consent to subleasing of the complete fixed base operation on the leased premises by Navajo Aviation, Inc. to LARON ENTERPRISES, INC., consisting of two principals, John P. Lauritz and Ronald E. Sorenson, both of Palo Alto, California, effective December 1, 1976. Mr. Fred Gore, President of Navajo Aviation, Inc., stated in his request for County consent that the sub-lessees will continue to operate with the name of P:AVAJO AVIATION and he will continue to be responsible to the County for carrying out the terms of the lease with the County. Messrs. Lauritz and Sorenson have submitted personal resumes, personal financial statements, and Articles of Laron Enterprises, Incorporation which the staff finds satisfactory. The proposed sublease complies with Section 18 of the original lease for subletting. It is recommended that the Board authorize its Chairman to execute the Lessor (County) Consent attached to the Sublease dated November 23, 1976. (R/P) 00011 P � t • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California November 30, 1976 A G E N D A REPORTS None SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 1. PORT CHICAGO HIGHWAY BRIDGE - ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS - Port Chicago Area it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the following Grant Deed, Temporary Construction Permits and Right of Way Contracts, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute said Permits and Contracts on behalf of the County. A. Grant Deed and Temporary Construction Permit dated November 4, 1976, from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District; Consideration: $390; Payee: First California Title Company, Escrow No. 82920. Payment is for fee title to 467 square feet and temporary use of 2,835 square feet of Light Industrial land. — B. Temporary Construction Permit dated November 3, 1976, from Mathew W. Gonsalves, et al; Consideration: $32; Payee: Mathew W. Gonsalves, Marlene M. Gonsalves, William Gonsalves, Marian Gonsalves, John M. Gonsalves, Charlene Gonsalves, Gerald E. Santucci, Inez Santucci, Raymond P. Santucci and Helen Santucci. Payment is for temporary use of 685 square feet of Light Industrial land. (RE: Project No. 4371-4283-663-76) (RP) Item 2. OLIVE DRIVE STOILM DRAIN - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Concord Area The work performed under the contract for installation of an 84-inch diameter storm drain crossing Olive Drive near Kirker Pass Road was completed by the contractor, Mountain Construction, Inc. of San Ramon, on November 22, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approxi- mately $104,000. (continued on next page) A G E N_ D APublic Works Department Page 1 o_f 4 November 30, 1976 00012 Item 2 continued: In accordance with the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, written approval of the work has been received from the City of Concord. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as . complete as of November 22, 1976. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 8521-0925-75) (C) Item 3. SMITH LANE - EXECUTE OFFER OF DEDICATION - Concord It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve an Offer of Dedication of a 28-foot strip of land along the County Fire College property on Smith Lane to the City of Concord, and authorize the Chair- man of the Board to execute said Offer on behalf of County Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 and the County Fire District. The Dedica- tion is a requirement of the City for frontage improvement development by the County. (RE: Work Order 2025-2025-7712-618) (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 4. MINNESOTA AVENUE - BRIDGE REPAIR - Brentwood Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Director to temporarily close Minnesota Avenue south of Randy Way, in the Brentwood area, from December 6, 1976 through December 10, 1976 to allow the County Public Works Department to repair the deter- iorated deck of the bridge over Sand Creek. Traffic will be routed around the site via Fairview and Dainty Avenue. (M) Item 5. EL PINTADO - ACCEPT DEDICATION - Danville Area it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept, for recordation only, an Offer of Dedication dated November 10, 1976, from Luciano Queirolo and Silvio Queirolo for a storm drainage easement along San Ramon Creek. Said Offer is being made as a condition of approval of Development Permit 3008-76. (RE: Work Order 8205-2505) (RP) Item 6. PITTSBURG-ANTIOCH HIGHWAY - APPROVE AGREFI ENT - Antioch Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve, and authorize the Public works Director to execute, a Road Improvement Agreement with Louis G. Madrigal. This Agreement is a. reauirement of the Board of Adjustment for Land Use Permit 2121-75. Owner: Louis G. Madrigal, P. 0. Box 681, Antioch, CA 94509 Location: Land Use Permit 2121-75 is located on the south side of Pittsburg-Antioch Highway, east of Standard Oil Avenue. (LD) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 4 November 30, 1976 00013 .,,�.•4K,y v.r . Item 7. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Alamo Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute, an Architectural Services Agree- ment with Royston, Hanamoto, Beck & Abey, Landscape Architects, 225 Miller Avenue, Mill Valley, California, to design Community Park No. 1 (County Service Area R-7) on a forty-three acre site adjacent to Monte Vista High School on Stone Valley Road in Alamo. This Agreement provides for a total fee of $30,000 for services rendered through the design process and is to be paid in increments as the work is accomplished, as specified in the Agreement. (RE: Work Order 5486-927) (SAC) GENERAL Item 8. FIRE COLLEGE SITE - ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, approve the plans and specifications and the cost estimate for the con- struction of Phases V and VI of the Fire College Site Improvements, Treat Boulevard, Concord, and direct its Clerk to advertise for con- struction bids to be received until 11:00 a.m. on December 21, 1976. This contract calls for construction of a driver's training area and road frontage improvements on Smith Lane, Concord. The Engineer's cost estimate for the base bid is $130,500. The Fire District staff and the Public Works Department have reviewed and approved the plans and specifications. A Negative Declaration pertaining to this project was posted and filed with the County Clerk on November 16, 1976, with no protests received. The project has been determined to conform with the General Plan. It is further recommended that the Board of Supervisors determine that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and instruct the Director of Planning to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. (RE: 2025-2025-7712-618) (B&G) Item 9. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - REPORT TO THE BOARD A,W AUTHORIZATION FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE STATE BOARD This Board and a majority of the cities within the County which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the County have approved the November, 1976 Draft Solid Waste Management Plan, as approved by this Board on November 9, 1976. In order to meet the December 1, 1976 submittal date set by the State Solid Waste Management Board, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize Chairman James P. Fenny to execute a letter of transmittal and forward the Plan, as recuired, to the State Solid Waste Management Board. It is further recommended that the Public Works Director be authorized to transmit certified copies of documents evidencing city action on the Plan to the State Solid Waste Management Board. (EC) A G E N D A Public Works Department -Page 3 of 4 November 30, 1976 00014 „ .. n ��,��-. �- ,tee., ��•, 0. Item 10. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY I. The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Supervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. 2. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider attached 'Calendar of Water Meetings." No action required. (EC) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 4 November 30, 1976 00015 ttk Prepared J.zintly b; the Water Resources Representative and the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County Water Agency November 23, 1976 CALENDAR OF WATER MEETINGS TIME ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REMARKS Recommended Authorization Nov. 29 Mon's. State Water 10:00 a.m. Water Quality Staff to Tues's. Resources Auditorium Control Plan- Dec. 15 Wed's. Control Board Resources Bldg. Delta and Suisun Sacramento Marsh Nov. 19 Fri. Senate Comm. 9:30 a.m. The Peripheral Canal Staff on Natural Bristow Theatre and Alternative Delta Resources 6 b Edna Hill Water Transfer Wildlife Jr. High School Facilities 140 Birch St. Brentwood Nov. 29 Mon. Department 7:30 p.m. Rehearing-- Staff of Water Board of Delta Alternatives Resources Supervisors to the Peripheral Chambers Canal Bakersfield Dec. 9 Thurs. Interagency 10:00 a.m. San Joaquin Master Staff Drainage Farm Bureau Plan Program Office Fresno 00016 Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time). 00017 i' I In the Board 'of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Introduced. :he following ordinances) Vaich amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes December 7, 1976 as the time for adoption of same: amending Section 416-8.012 of the County Ordinance Code with respect to increasing fees and penalties collected for impounded animals PASSED by the Board on November 34. 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid_ Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors -ofiixed this 30th d of November _ 19 76 1 FL OLSSON, Clerk By 46a . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 00018 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California november 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on november 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 30thfay of november 19 76 (n� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By!CSC — o< Deputy Clerk Dorothy s Donald H-24 3/7615m 00019 d`� kd 1 Y POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 93 Y/ Department Assessor's Budget Unit 016 Date 8/12/76 Action Requested: Reclassify ITC Position tO1 (Jean D'Ascanio) to Assessment Services Clerk. Proposed effective date: 9/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To classify position to more appropriate classificat.on in line with existing responsibilities. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount•. r� RECEIVED 892 1. Salaries-4nd;wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (lie.t .items axd coat) AUG 2 3 1976 Office Of $ -0- unry Mmint for Estimated total _ $ 892 Signature C.-,6 W,t 4 Department e d Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 10/29/76 To Civil Service for Classification Review an ommeno�� Countv Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk to Assessment Services Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being being performed justify reclassifi- cation to Assessment Services Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Intermediate Typist Clerk position #01, Salary Level 222 (725-881) to Assessment Services Clerk, Salary Level 263 (822-999). Assistant Personnefi Director Recommendation of County Administrator 1% Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County A minist ator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on 7V 3 0 1976 J. R. OLSS9 County Clerk Date: 1iOV 3 0 1976 — B �j�Leri�;��„ Maxine M.Neufeld Deputy,Clerk APPROVAL op tki,s adjustment comsti.tites an Apptop-„c.,,ticn Adjres;mc;*,t and Pe)rao►utet Re.sotuttiou Amejtdment. NOTE: Toe section and reverse side of form mca t be completed and supplarerted, when appropria e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00020 I V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: -3 Department Assessor rs Budget Unit o16 Date Aug. 16, 1976 Action Requested: Reclassify I?C Position X02 (Barbara Stewart) to Assessment Services Clerk Proposed effective date: 9/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To classify position in line with existing duties ..and responsibilities. Contra RECEIVED"nry' Estimated cost oLadjustment: 1/Ej� - Amount: 1. SalBries�and,rages: AUG 2 19J ; 892 2. Fixed Assets-n (tLi,a.t Z&-me and coe•t) _ unfv ptf;I �e °f ainist�tor --- Estimated total j $ 892 Signature Depytm6nt HeacV Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 10/23/76 To Civil Service for Classification Review and Recomtnendat n County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk to Assessment Services Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Assessment Services Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Intermediate Typist Clerk position 102, Salary Level 222 (725-881) to Assessment Services Clerk, Salary Level 263 (822-999). Assistant Personnel Ditector Recommendation of County Administrator /Date: December 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on _NOV 1 n 1279 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: NOV 3 P 7975 — By:''���' A%:.acne M-Neufeld Deputy Clerk APPROVAL op .thio adjustmeizt conzti.tates an Apntop--,Za ion Adj"tment and Peuonnef ResoPution Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropr1a e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) O 9021 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 2V2, Department Assessor's Budget Unit 016 Date August 12, 1976 Action Requested: Reclassify ITC Position 106 (May Colter) to Assessment Services Clerk Proposed effective date: 9/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To classify position to more appropriate classifi- cation -in line with responsibilities. Clerk coordinates work within Standards nivicipn and is responcihle for anromplishmpnt of clerical workload therein. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costo County Amount: 1. Salaries and wages: RECEIVED 5 892 2. Fixed "ts; (fit .items and coat) c�, n���.o $ -0- Estimate ovotvy na Administrator $ 892 Signature DepartVtlieAdl Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 10/29/76 To Civil Service for Classification R-vi w commendat".n County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify Intermediate Typist Clerk to Assessment Services Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Assessment Services Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassifi- cation of Intermediate Typist Clerk, position 606, Salary Level 222 (725-881) to Assessment Services Clerk, Salary Level 263 (822-999). Assistant Personnels rector Recommendation of County Administrator -% Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 0 1976 J. R. OLSSON,1County Clerk Date: ByJ .�TJr�.L�� VcPury er Maxine M.Neutetcf ' APPROVAL es thCs adjuitment ce►za.ti tutu mi Apptcp=„tctt On Adju.st►re►tt and Pe.-zonaeE Reeofu,ti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00022 p N az * r :4 A•, Division Affected: Standards Division B. New Organization Chart Attached LQ 1`^S submitted) no C. ,(1) Current Official Job Classification: Intermediate Typist Clerk (2) Working Job Title: Standards Division Clerical Coordinator (3) Place/Hours Worked: 834 Court Street, Martinez, CA 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. D. Is this a new function? Please explain: No. (See "M" below) E. What are the principal duties and responsibilities of this position? 1. Responsible for clerical coordination within Standards Division. 2. Responsible for accomplishment of Sales Questionnaire Program which gathers data for Sales Ratio studies. 3. Set up schedule for training of new appraisers under State Board of Equalization program. Maintain certification records to make certain appraisers meet requirements of annual training. 4. Perform more difficult clerical functions. 5. Maintain library of appraisal publications. Additional information attached ®yam LD no F. Have any activities or responsibilities been assigned to this position from another position? Please explain. No. G. Number, location and titles of other positions assigned same or like functions: Has lead responsibility for unit. H. Designate the name and title of the person who supervises this position. How? Joe Suta, Chief, Standards Division - assigns and may review work output. I. List the names of employees supervised. If a unit is to be supervised, simply name the unit and state the number of employees. Standards Division Clerical staff - 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk, 1 Typist Clerk, 1/2 Trainee, 1/5 Intermediate Typist Clerk J. Will other positions in the department be affected by this adjustment? How? Would elevate this position above those directed, as all are presently same classification. K. Supporting work load data (required only for additional positions): N/A L. Describe any special features of the equipment or other fixed assets requested (e.g.- left pedestal typewriter desk, 10 key listing adding machine, etc.) M. Additional Comments: Due to increasing number of systems and assignments of technical positions, work has become more complex as well as increased workload. 00023 Y V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Auditor-Controller Budget Unit '111 Date 7-1-75 Data rocesszn Action Requested: Reclassifv three (3) Proaram Analvst's positions to Senior Proaram Analvst positions. Proposed effective date:ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Classify position in line Leith duties beincr nerfor_med. Ccnt,-a C- Couni; Estimated Zos�f adjustment: Amount: 1. Salaries ant wages: 5,796.n0 2. Fixed Asse4: (Lie# items mtd coat) - v - .:o of Estimated total 51 .00 Signature Department He Initial Determination of County Administrator Da 7-i 5- 71. o �r�a/ �.e_.si� R G�7rS.r yr•�c a7'r-►! (q�'� �^�!- `7 County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify (3) Program Analyst-IDP to Senior Program Analyst-IDP. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Senior Program Analyst-IDP. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Program Analyst-IDP, positions 102, 03 and #05, Salary Level 449 (1449-1761) to Senior Program Analyst-EDP, Salary Level 479 (1588-1930). Assistant Personnel Ditector Recommendation of County Administrator te: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administra or Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED {�) on NOV 3 0 !%-'6 J. R. OLSSON Cou--nty`Clerk Date: 140t' 't lg7Ft — By1'�dltr�c�' are M.Neufe:a Deputy Uerk APPROVAL o' th s adjubtmeizt const tutee cut App4op4.i.a.L ott Adju,biejtt and PeJr6on)zd_' Reeot tion Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mub.t be completed and supplemented, when approprra e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 0U024 �'I v IC I POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Auditor-Controller Department Data Processing Budget Unit 011 Date 10-28-76 Action Requested: Reclassify two Programmer II Positions (Pot. Nos. 02 & 05) to two Systems Software Analyst positions. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To establish positions for newly created classification. Estimated cost pf adjustment: - M Y Amount: 1. Salariesandlages: :�L IV. ^- 5 2,520 2. Fixed Assets;,. (.tial .items and coot( Estimated total., $ 2,520 Signature ` D N Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 3, I To Civil Service: Request recommendation. �- P County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify (2) Programmer II- to Systems Software Analyst. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Systems Software Analyst. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassifi- cation of Programmer II, positions #02 and #05, Salary Level 412 (1294-1573) to Systems Software Analyst, Salary Level 436 (1393-1693). , , Assistant Personnel Dafrector Recommendation of County Administrator ;`jl7ate: november 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 2976. County Admi r Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED } on 110V 3 n J. R. OLSSON,,_ County Clerk Date: NOV _i _ 197R By: ��r0,.riS�,G,!>�o el ___ � � Deputy k.axinA.fleuled �� D uty Cter.c APPROVAL o f this adjustmuit co,staute.s art Apptop',i_--ti.oi_ Ad1usttrent curd Peuo:tneZ RuoCuti.o,: Amv_drrant. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form muwt be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (11347) (Rev. 11/70) 00025 S POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Human Resources Agency Budget Unit 180 Date 3--8-76 Action Requested:Reclassify Department systems SPecialist 101 to Administrative services Assistant ari (cristy) Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To Proppeebc `� t gid �rl zefZect ne 2tiim duties and responsibilities of the incumbent RECEIVED Es ti matQ co,41 oQadjustment: f AP. - 9 1976 Amount: LIJ - 0. Office of 1. Salar�s Nd wages: 2. 7tixed�ssgLs: (Wt .items and coat) County Administrator $ $ Estimated total Signature ,. E Depa Initial Determination of County Administrator ate: March , 1976 To Civil Service: J Request recommendation. County'A&MfiistMor Personnel Office and/or Civil Service CommissionDate: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Department Systems Specialist to Administrative Services Assistant III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassifi- cation of Department Systems Specialist position #01, Salary Level 447 (1440-1750) to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 472 (1554-1889). 00, / GZY li Assistant PersonneY Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 County Clerk Date: lily 5 By:///�lrn-y /. ��c�� _ r 41a�cine td.(Neufeld DePuy Uerk APPROVAL of .tki,5 adjuetrrent ccnsti,tu.tes an App.:op.,.iati.on Adjua.tmennt'and Penao►uteZ Resoluti.ou Amej:dment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropria e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00026 i' 1 yid � POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: y0� Department PROBATION Budget Unit§308 Date 9/15/76 Action Requested: Reclassify (1) Senior Clerk position a04 (F. Lingar) to Supervising Clerk 1 Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why a`ajustment is needed: To properly classify employee Co^�:.: G��r� Cosn�; Estimated-cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 - 1. Salaries and-wages: S 2. Fixed,iSsets: (List .items and coat) ;=" of Estimated total Signature lam✓ �_ ?q=nt Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: Oct er 19 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation, pursuan o mem t October 19, 1976, attached. ( 'j Corin—tCorin—ty Ami&stfttcfr Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: november 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Senior Clerk to Supervising Clerk I. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Senior Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Senior Clerk position #04, Salary Level 264 (824-1002) to Supervising Clerk I, Salary Level 315 (963-1170). Assistant Personnel/Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Admt—ni§trcft6r Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 r J. R. OLSSON, Coiznty Clerk Date: iii' tg;; By Waxing M.Neufeld DePUTV.Clerk APPROVAL of thie adjustmuit eon6tLituteb an Approp._iaticn Adjua-tm2nt and Pvcbonnet Resolution Amendmott. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 000V f .4. .�• .AN �J �A C- v POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department County Clerk-Recorder Budget Unit 240 Date 11-17-76 Cancel Senior Clerk position—B5 OE- Action Requested: and establish Administratift Services Assistant Proposed effective date: 12-1-76 Explain why adjustment s n ede Vacant position gives opportunity to provide prope liason between �dmgnIsratur, , divisions as budget units Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Amount:mount•a Co�nr�, . 1. Salaries and wages: I? 2. Fixed Assets: (tint heirs and coat) auv of Estimated total J l � Signature Department Head Initial Determ*natti''on of County/Administrator Date: o G✓�� o►Q�✓'c,( Tzje ���s'Jr�� ,ecs✓!2w`" pef �c'cv,y LJ�v�c�d�,pG Count �nistrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: _ November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Administrative Services Assistant III and cancel 1-Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Administrative Services Assistant, Salary Level 472 (1554-1889) and the cancellation of 1 Senior Clerk, position 901, Salary Level 264 (824-1002). AQciqrhnr PersonnelAi rector Recommendation of County Administrator /' ' Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. r County A&Wrstfrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED �) on NDV 3 - J. OL�. Count ler�c Date: f�C�r By: 2 hlaxlne fA'NeUfete DePuty Clerk APPROVAL o6 this adjtLstrnejtt co►6titcttes an App.toptiati.on Ad1uetmejtt and PeteonneZ Resotu tion Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropria-fe, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (N347) (Rev. 11/70) 00028 s MOEN POS I T I 014 ADJ US TMENT REQUEST No: Department CCCo. Medical services Budget Unit 540 Date 9/28/76 Action Requested: cancel Morgue Attendant position #227-01 and add one Licensed vocational Nurse position Proposed effective date: 10/1/76 Explain why_�adju tmgnt is needed: Provide a position for Mr. Frank Crandall, L.V.N., who • w Is w'orkitrg out-of-class as a Morgue Attendant rn Estimated cost`af adjustment: Lic. voc. Nurse - $773/mo. Amount: Morgue Attendant - 750/mof, 'a CoiA CoUn 1. Salaries and wages: 23. x 9 mo�5= 207. 2. Fixed Assets: (t zt .items and cost) ;-IIV to ,_ c ups 1 97o HUj," RESOLi',C' Approved/ Estimated total ";`ce °f $ 207. Dot Signature George Degnan, ., ical Director Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: October 1. , 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. u, CountY'\Admi4&&ator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission D t November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Licensed Vocational Nurse and cancel 1 Morgue Attendant. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Licensed Vocational Nurse. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Licensed Vocational Nurse, Salary Level 243 (793-940) and the cancellation of 1 Morgue Attendant, position $01, Salary Level 233 (750-911). Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator /ate: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. -Co—untY Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on 110V 3 n �JJ..j R. OLSSON, ,County Clerk lov WZdna M.Neu efo � eFutY Clark APPROVAL o6 .this adjustment cons.titatea all AppJwp-�-intim Adjustment and Pvtzonnet Resotuti.on Ame+:dmen . NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form rust be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00029 �1 POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: -,?V/ % Department CCCo. Medical Services Budget Unit 540 Date 9/17/76 Action Requested: cancel Account Clerk III Position #742,02; add Wpist Clerk Position Proposed effective date: 11/17/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide adequate staffing for Business Services function Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: 1. Salaries and wages: RECEIVED $ 2. FixedAssitks: (acs# Items tout coat) cr�F R ��/o ^ SJ -- - Office of $ I County Administrator HUMAN A1:17-K' Estimated total {� $ Appro%ZW�� Signature George Degna4M 13., Medical Director Dare_z� Department Head&4`- Initial Determination of County Administrator Dat e• October 12 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count ra r Personnel Office and/or Civil Service CommissionD e: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Clerk and cancel 1 Account Clerk III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Clerk, Salary Level 162 (604-734) and the cancellation of 1 Account Clerk III, position #02, Salary Level 281 (868-1055). Assistant Personnel DirActor Recommendation of County Administrator i te: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 V 1270 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Dalue: BY °puty . erk APPROVAL oS -firs adjU.s�br;emt an App•:op ia.t cn Adju.sbn?,Lt mid PEtscnnv- RCs.-Cutica Amaj!&rent. NOTE: Tom section and reverse side of form mtzs.t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (1.1347) (Rev. 11/70) 00030 f� V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: � GD Department PROBATION Budget Unit 327_ Date 10/26/76 Action Requested: Cancel vacant DPO I, P.I. position (254-801); add one Group Counselor I P.1. position Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adj anent is needed: Duties performed are more like Group Counselor than OPO. All work det4d) positions in program are Group Counselors Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: Small decrease in temp. Sai. costs 1. Salaries and wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (t i4t .items and coe-t) $ Estimated total $ . None Signature 'Ddpartment Head Initial.Determination of County Administrator to To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count mffffiM ra Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: V November 23, 19Z6 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Permanent Intermittent Group Counsellor I and cancel 1 Permanent Intermittent Deputy Probation Officer I. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Permanent Intermittent Group Counsellor I. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Permanent Intermittent Group Counsellor I, Salary Level 281 (868-1055) and the cancella- tion of 1 Deputy Probation Officer I position 5801, Salary Level 325 (993-1207). �.I. Assistant Personnell Di rector Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976_ County Xdministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 4 1916 R. OLSSON, Xounty Clerk Date: NOY 5 C 1 Zo By: hfaxne M._Ned(eld Vs APPROVAL o6 tiLis adjustment eonetitut" an Appnop.-,cati.on Adjus.6.-ett and Peucnnet Reeotuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when approprta e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00031 a V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST tto: 71`�� �1 Department County-Recorder • • Budget Unit 3a Date 10/15/76 Action Requested: Cancel permanent ITC position # 1 and establish permanent Key Punch Operator Y#02 . Proposed effective date:12 1 6 Explain why adjustment is needed: Key punch volume has increased to point where trained Key Punch operator should do this work. Estimated cos��f� Cont,, Costa County Amount: 1. S,alarie'.s an'-Id' wages: REC gVED 2. Fixed Assets: (.Gest .items mid cost) None OCT ? �t fulb Offic$ of un Adrninistroto Estimated total , Signature -y � ����,�✓ Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: /D--12 To Civil Service: request recommended pursuant to memorandtyn dated October 25, 1976 G County Administrator Personnel Office and/or'Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Keypunch Operator and cancel 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Keypunch Operator. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Keypunch Operator, Salary Level 225 (732-889) and the cancellation of 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk, position #06, Salary Level 222 5725-881). Assistant Personnel -Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Aaministrator Action of the Board of Suaervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 0 1976 Q�� J. i g County Clerk Date: MAI I U '376 By: hfaxir.?'3A.t:eufe'd Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o� ';Li s adjus:ancnt cv sti tutes cit Apptcp-,Zation Adjus bn2ftt curd Pe,tscnttet RcsoZutZoi, Amciubic Lt. t111E: Top section and reverse side of form crust be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (14347) (Rev. 11/70) 0 2 I an — V/ POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: i /l1 � 255 Department _sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 257 Date 11/10/76 Action Requested: Cancel back-up position of Sergeant 255-306-049. Transfer position 257-306-02 to 255-306- Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Project grant ended 9/30/75 Estimated cost,of adjustment: Contra Cosia Coun,y Amount: u 1. Salaries-and wages: RECENt-D S 2. Fixed Assets: (tia•t .items and coat) :Iu fM16 Estimated (ift§V Administratcr $ c — Signature D ICE Dc r :N. SERVICES OFFICE, Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: G To Civil Service: Request recommendation. CountV AdEMstrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission D te: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Sergeant position. Transfer Sergeant position $02 from Cost Center 257 to 255. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling 1 Sergeant position #49 in Cost Center 255, Salary Level 446 (1436-1745). Transfer Sergeant position 102 from Cost Center 257 to 255. Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personnel ffirector Recommendation of County Administrator /Date: November 24. 1979 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Adffnnistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 +a J. R. SON, tountY Jerk Date: NOV 5 2 1975 By: _ G tAa)d'+,a,`A.Ne&fetV Dopu4 Clerk APPROVAL o' ,tliiz ad;ua�rcrt constitutes an App.:.cptiation AdJu.sZneiw and Pehaonnet Resotution Ar„endment. NOTE: T9 section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when e ippropr�, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (14347) (Rev. 11/70) 0()033 :ttu' �5 .. — Y'•.. .... .::. ., .. ...., . .: .. i. r.,. ... a -,. .. .. .. . .. -- 1. .;. F 1 1110 V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 255 Date 11/10/76 Action Requested: - Cancel back:-up position for Donald B. Sills - Sergeant 255-301;-04R Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Donald B. Sills was granted a disability retirement ll/9/76--,to,be effective 5/15/75. Estimated'cosMf adjustment: - Amount: 1. Salariet aria wages: Contrc Cos,-13 Coursf 2. Fixed Rssets: (fit items and coat) $ Estimated total Orrice of .� COUn1)/ n � �%/r�cr Signature ..fes/ Denn-Cr " i z MERIF"F-CORONER Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: /�- To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County min trliz.L t ator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Sergeant position. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling 1 Sergeant position #48, Salary Level 446 (1436-1745). Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personnel/Director Recommendation of County Administrator / Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on My 3 n 191; I R. OLSSON. Lon!J/�' �CIS Date: y 3 Q 11i POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department _ Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 300 Date _11/9/76 Action Requested: Cancel back-up position 300-306-011 - Sergeant Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: _Death of Agnes Choate 5/29/76 Estimatedccost o'f djustment: - Amount: c+ Contra Cosa County 1. Salaries-iandr wages: RECEIVED $ 2. Fixed Ks eq: i ti.6 t items alai cost) td " D I $ :? 3: Estimated Cotaly Administroitor Signature DeparrtnO rWflea MIN. SERVICES OFFICER Initial Determination of County Administrator ^Date: To Civil Service: Request recommendation. goundmffitn strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: November 23 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel l Sergeant position. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling 1 Sergeant position #11, Salary Level 446 (1436-1745). Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant Personnel -Director Recommendation of County Administrator 4/ Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County dministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED } on NOV 3 Q 1976 J. R. OLSSON„County Clerk Date: NOY 3 a 1976 Byc.' 'J Waxine M. !ep efd L�ePUI Clerk APPROVAL of -tftss adjuetinea.t constitaes an Apptop%i.ation Adjus.bne�tt and Pet.aonneE. Re.aotutZcn Ameudme►tt. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mub.t be completed and supplemented, when appropr�e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (1.1347) (Rev. 11/70) O1iA�0 J POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 7� Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 055 Date 11/12/76 Action Requested: Caneel back-up position 455-299-07 Comginications Technician Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: neath of .losPph Sollid 8/15/76 Estimated cost--,of adjustment: Amount: v Ccn:r,; Cc;, 1. Salaries and wages: , V�7 $ 2. Fixed Assets: (t-iAt item6 and coot) - O:r.ce of Estimated td-tahry Signature Dqp""IeD !3 ewi�rcaaoNea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count n ator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Datl: November 23. 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Communications Technician position. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling 1 Communications Technician, position 007, Salary Level 371t (1259-1388). Can be effective day following Board action. Assistant 'PersonneMirector Recommendation of County Administrator // Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. 0(7 County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED (.) on NOV 3 R 76 J. R. SSON_. C. Y Clark Date: 401 3 1976 By ;% Maxirw ht.Neufeld' �Qerk APPROVAL o6 t;Liz adjus.tmeat ccnztc,tut_eA an Apptopr.c.atto)L Adjuatwitt and PvL!onnet RCSC4'Uti.0i2 AMC)-dmellt. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mua.t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00019035 ■ w ww ■ �111 ilAll �{ I [j i4 1, POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: aL /. Department Social Service Budget Unit _5Q]„ Date Octnber 18. 1475 =4/90 Action Requested: Cancel nnp(1) Snrial Wnrk Sirnarvicnr jTT pneition 4844x!(11-yara0t) and add one Children's Services Program Specialist positi9lMposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide a position at the appropriate classification as necessary to permit appointment. Estimated cost of adjustment: ;,' - �, Amount: 1. Salaries and wages: r.^- ., 5 g{,Un 2. Fixed Assets: (.fiat stems and cost) �Lignature stimated total7 pa•e l - Department Hea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November,,-1801976- To Civil Service; Request recommendation. Count miA4&t1qtor� Personnel Office and/or Civil Service CommissionD e: November 23 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Children's Services Program Specialist and cancel 1 20/40 Social Work Supervisorlll Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Childre 's Services Program Specialist. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Children's Services Program Specialist, Salary Level 449 (1.449-1761) and the cancellation of 1 20/40 Social Work Supervisor III, position $01 (cost center 501), Salary Level 487 (1627-1971). Assistant Personnel4Wrector Recommendation of County Administrator �;� Date: November 24, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976_ 00 County ministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on NOV 3 n 1976 J. R. OLSSGN, County Clerk Date: 'N Y s a r: By C,l-�Ne.-e�r �00-1�,bj lQaacinc �Clek APPROVAL o$ tlLi.s adjustment ccn51-'- tut2a an App_c-',Za.ti.or Adjus-tinet« acid�ftuotuw-t Resotution Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form n^:Ls% be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected_ P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 000007 i I POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: �'Iyyy 501 /s Department Social Service Budget Unit 505 Date /flew. .ZLr 9.� Action Requested: Reduce the hours of full time Social Work Practitioner II pag itionc x'505/02 and #501/45 to 32/40 Proposed effective date:l2/_ 1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To move additional Services employees into Part-time p( sitions (Therese Schulman and Agnes Allison). This request supersedes P-300 #9484. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: RECEIVED 1. LSSalaQlps end wages: $ 2. -Fixed Assets: fit .item6 and coat) NOV 2 2 1976 toy Estimated total $ - Signature G. �• vCk Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 23, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. .fid _��✓ Count mi for Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission D November 23, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Decrease hours of Social Work Practitioner II positions #02 and #05. Study discloses duties and responsibilities remain appropriate to the class of Social Work Practitioner II. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by decreasing the hours of 40/40 Social Work Practitioner II positions 102 and #45 to 32/40, bothat Salary Level 432 (1376-1672). Can be effective day following Board action. Ass-scant4—Pe—,—so-n4ne'Y'--Director Recommendation of County Administrator j/ Date: November 24. 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective December 1, 1976. County Adm nistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on NOV 30 igis— J. R. OLSSON _ ; County Clerk Date: NOV 3 0 197-1 By c;--, � fxine%!-,I:._ut_.d �us7L U daerli APPROVAL of ;hiz adjue;ment colistituteb an Apprcpr.i.atlon Ad1ustme►zt and Peuannet Ruotuti.on Amendme►tt. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented; when appropr�e, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 0 0038 ONTO I w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California "ovember 30 11976 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on "ovember 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 30tWay of November . 1976 J. fi. OLSSON, Clerk By ad � Deputy Clerk Doro'Why MacDonald QU!l 9 H-24 3/76 15m I i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT CEPARTmENT.Ca CUCOET t;%T County Library 620 RESgR\fEV;FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLCER•S USE C�d Spcc ar i:ACCOUNT OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Ccde Qvantitvl Fund B.rdaetUn,t O6iect CR X IN 661 01 1206 620-2463 Audio Visual $ 8,259 01 1206 991-9970 Reserve for Contingencies $ 8,259 PROOF _C_°"?_ K•P_ V;- '• EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(IF capital outlay,list items and cast of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust Audio Visual Account for orders worth $8,259 Dc,e Da>- a,cn which were outstanding on June 30, 1976 and for which funds were not carried forward into yfiscal year 1976-77. �hSrtTfiicfl2fhfj d��Fa�'�talc'�� t1�1/a•uc/Cs ✓✓*,c a(t]a`c l a b l c i ys * l�iC'/ vl c cl f?•�// //sP T APPROVED: SI GNAMIF ES DATE cl c L c K h AUDITOR— X11) CONTROLLER: � COUNTY ADMINTSTRATOR; BOARD OLEaRrIlI J R vu:1ES Oqq��ER: ilYit p luariarty. I3o=e!3S. littxhrld. 46x4--, t�. 1,1. Mas 00044 NO:.•�..c-rt�L ,,,HDI 3 R "��0 1 Admin. Assistant 11/19/76 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK b,121Glt a'' li Maxine M.Neuter I S,gnat-re Title Date DeRsnY Cterk AJpaprA No.C� �C ` (M 129 REV. 2175) v, Instructions rwt Ret erse Side • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION'ADJUSTMENT CFPARTMEN't OR CUDGEF UNIT Pub is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Saeaal ACCOUNT 2. 08:ECT OF EXPENSE OPFIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Q Code antity) FpOO &doetUnit Obiect Sub,Acct. CR X IN 66) COUNTY SERVICE AREA R=6 ORINDA 01 2753 2753-7758 003 Sound Equipment 440 f 1^ 9970 Reserve for Contingencies 440 PROOF _C_omp._ K.P. _;'ER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Additional Required to cover replacement of stolen Date Desc"ptiaa sound equipment, APPROVED: ONATURF AT AUDITOR— CONTROLLO�ti : 3 COUNTY �� /�Z�7 ADMINISTRATOR: 8 0 A R D tPERvir RS OonER YES: ��� },1Sihs Norlrrtr. Boggess, Lin3chvi,i. /A Dias No:. � Nov 3 Q 1976 nn NM J. R OLSSON CLERK /; .1�L1 L,,� J/ Deputy Public Works Director 11/23/76 Maxine M.Neufeld S gaar re.(i"rf C Title �n Date Deputy Cleric J Approp.Adj. G/ (M 129 REQ'. 2/75) Journal No. l,, In, rur Bons on Ref use Sldr �a �1 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY i APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Auditor-Controller 010 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OE IECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• increase Code Quantity) Fund B�dotUnit Ob ect Sub.Acct. Oeueax CR X IN 66) 01 1 1003 0-7751 002 Typewriter, manual 276 01 1 1003 010-7752 007 Chair, executive 276 Contra Costa County RECEIVED NOV 9 Office of County Administrator PROOF Comp.-_ _K.P:_ _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(!f capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To transfer funds to purchase executive chair to replace Dote Description existing chair which is not repairable. APPROVED: SI AURES DATE AUDITO11 \) CONTROLLER: a) COUNTY ✓ ADMINISTRATOR: r! /� BOARD OF NabV�,Sejq�p+Fl�tia Moriarty. ' YES 13o�ges, i 1 r.+c2:•S NO% `��.rM& on 3 o }yTs 00042 J. R.otssoN ctERfc Admin. Svcs. Officer 11 19 76 Maxine M.t\ Utel gnetur Title Date ueputy'CIerk Approp.Adj. �OS� I M 129 Rev. 1,66) Journal No. •See Instructions on Rererse Side i 11 �i ...............I'll"', CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT VEP:7TMEr:T OP EUDGET U!IIT PROBATION c308 RESERVED FOR AUDI TOR-CON TROLLER•$USE Cord Speual ACCOUNT 2. vaJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase ode dFund CQuan t ) BudoetUnit Obroct Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) Ci 1003 308-1013 Temporary Salaries 9,410 308-1014 Overtime 653 i 308-1011 Perm. Salaries 8,940 308-1044 Retirement Contribution 805 308-1060 Insurance Contribution 318 C,G c O � _ � m .n - N r y PROOF Comp._ h P_ VE4. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY This adjustment is necessary to Cover costs Of two Date Descrprrcn additional typist clerk positions effective 12/1/76 for permanent salary, retirement and health ins. Two P. I. Typist Clerk positions are to be cancelled per discussions with staff from the County Administrator's office, which will result in temporary salary and overtime use reduction APPROVED: SIGMA RES DATE AUDITOR- ; CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: �=-. 1''Y�r1`~"li�-`�---L• `,G J BOARD OF SUPERVISQRS ORnER: YES: �upen%sont ht Uzy,11iiii J30SCew. I.lnxLel,l. `l A. 1A. Dig; NOV 3 Q 1916 00043 NO:. •��sG en ) R OLSSON, atRK bid/' �; _ 3'�"�AST.COUNTY PROBATION OFF. 11/15/76 J. Maxine bt.Neu.' !�t' Tale Dote Depute+ CCr:c Jourmol No. t50,5 (M 129 REV. 2/75) t,-, h:+Luctir.ec •.0 l rr rrsc Cidr CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub I Ic Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR•COHTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease Fund Fu Code Ouamitvl BudaetUnir Obiea Decrease Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) SEWAGE WASTE & WATER 01 1003 472-1013 I. Temporary Salaries 5500 I 10-42 r• ;.10P. EXpe,,se 320 PUBLIC WORKS 650-1013 I. Temporary Salaries 5500 lc4z FICd rppeose szo SANITARY SERVICES 475-1013 2. Temporary Salaries 4300 S !3 2. / 4300 lQ}} ^�fhtQ r•;L rt? JQ(ctrles Contra Costa County RECEIVED f140V -9 i97o Office of County Administrator PROOF Comp._ _ _V_E_R._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY I. Transfer temporary salary funds for permanent Date Description Intermittent position transferred to different Cost Center. 2. Increase to cover temporary employee pending filling permanent position by I/I/77. APPROVED: S' RE� DATE AUDIT5i / _ CONTROLLER: II!2�! COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: / BOARD OF SUPERVISQRS OR R: YES: .Yupen'i:'ots hea t'Y. J3orss yi:3c:;_11 A. 1A. Dias _ NONOV � � OU04� NO:. ?I,, J.R.OLSSON CLERKb�� r� G ; ubl is Works Dlractnr J�7,b /./.x/ne, Nei:.ei gnarly Title Date Deputy Clerk Approp.Adj. �0 Ste" t M 129 Rev, 2,6S I Journal No. ' Ser Instructions tin Rerrrse Side . 1. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PP '10 'Tr , n ii I: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE rJ I - f/c�/ltct..r Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. DEJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED AS"41 TF�(l� w , I _mase Fund 11 L"r iJ i �J iYf�rfY=e Cede Ocant,ty� BudaerUn,r Obiect Sut.Acct. 1 CR X IN 66) 01 1003 180-2100 Office Expense r. 500 180-2102 Books S Subscriptions 200 180-2477 Educational Supplies b Courses 300 PROOF _C_on p•__ _K.P. _V_E_R._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(11 capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust accounts to reflect current needs. Dere Descnpt,on APPROVED: tl ,ES DATE AUDIT = CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADhtIMSTRATOR: . f�2f�TL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YE 5: 9uPen *On FitYlAV• Ic- . BoQrsa00 0 r A. M. Dias Nov 3 p C� I�. J�IscJlw On J. R. OLSSON , , araWlll�l,CLERK 4. 6 -- — x Director 11-18-76 Maxine 1A.Neu( Id Siynamre Title n! Date 'ePuly Clerk Approp•Adl• M 129 Rev. 2166) -See Instructions on Reverse Side Journal No. F JF 71, • CONTRA COSTA COuwTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT t. CE?ART!•1ENT GP CUDGE(UNIT County Administrator RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Plant Ac M Cord Special ACCOUNT ?. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code O�ontity) Fund BudeetUnit 06iect Sub_Acct. CR X IN 66) O( 1003 086-7710 531 Remodel 805 Las Juntas $2,400 p 1003 086-7710 690 Tran. to 086-7710-531 $2,400 PROOF Comp.- K_P_ _V_ER.- 1. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay,list iterns and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Supplementary appropriation of $2,400 Date Desc'-pt.a, total of $7,000) required to provide office or Supervisorial District II due to the low lontract bid being higher than the project cost estimate. APPROVED: SIGNAILIRES DATE AUDITOR- CONTROLLER: 1 \ ADMINISTRATOR:t /�1G�7cs BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 8upenimrs Keen), Sio:iartp, A M. Dias 00046 NOV 3 n 1976 NO 411'e- on Assistant County as+ - Administrator-Finance 11/24/76 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK 6y< % s. hiacme td. euteia S.gnmute Tirle DDote Deputy ClerkClerkJournal No. (O/ (M 129 REV. 2/75) - c InstrucriwiN ..0 Rrr.•.se Side 'i 8 f'9 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I DEPARTMENT OP EUDGEr UNIT County Administrator RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLERS USE (Game Protection) Caid Speaol ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Qnnt,tvl Fund BudaetUnit Obreet i.,c.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1Q1 1102 367-7750 002 Boat with Trailer $6,900 C'1 1102 367-2479 Tran. to 367-7750-002 $6,900 PROOF .P_ _VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(if capitol outlay,list Mems and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To provide from Fish and Game Fund for Date replacement of County boat furnished wardens of State Department of Fish and Game for use within County in law enforcement work. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR- KLF 1 CONTROLLER: 3C COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 04WOrs1001y Jim y.1=W triarty. BG99e2e6 Ltnsehe& 00047 eitl-e-1 A. til. Dias NO. �Cca..c .;�VOY 3 Q 1916 ! t Assistant County Administrator-Finance J. R. OLSSON, CLERK E,/.��i� /''�`if,•/,�� t�•r.c� nistrator-Finance 11/24/7f Maxine M Ne-ufel S.grat .e _� Title Date Deputy Cerk Ap prop. No. (M 129 REV. 2/75) ' Srr lniLurttuus •,rt F.•t rnr Side IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Expressing ) Appreciation to Evelyn Kasik ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1039 WHEREAS Evelyn Kasik has served as secretary to Supervisor E. A. Linscheid since 1961; and WHEREAS Ms. Kasik was hired from regular Civil Service eligible lists for Typist Clerk and Intermediate Typist Clerk and promoted to the Civil Service position of Secretary to Member of the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS she worked half-tine for a number of years and became a full-time employee after the 5th supervisorial district was expanded to cover the whole eastern part of the County; and WHEREAS Supervisor Linscheid has indicated that Ms. Kasik has served faithfully and exceptionally well over the years in a secretarial "girl friday" capacity and assisted him greatly because of her broad knowledge of County government functions and operations; and WHEREAS citizens of District V and County staff have appreciated working with Ms. Kasik because of her businesslike, yet gentle manner; and WHEREAS Ms. Kasik is transferring to the County Planning Department because Supervisor Linscheid will be leaving office at the end of the year; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Supervisor Linscheid and members of this Board hereby express their appreciation to Evelyn Kasik for her exemplary service as Secretary to Member of the Board of Supervisors during the period 1961 through 1976. PASSED and ADOPTED on November 30, 1976. 00048 v IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA As Ex-Officio the Governing Board of The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications for Fire College ) Site Improvements - Phase V & VI, ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1= Concord. ) (2025-2025-7712-618) ) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for the Fire College Site Improvements - Phases V & VI at Contra Costa County Fire Protec- tion District, Fire College, Treat Boulevard, Concord have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the Engineer's cost estimate for the base bid of the construction contract is $130,500; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages which shall be. the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and WHEREAS the Public Works Director has advised the Board that the project was determined to conform to the General Plan and a negative declaration pertaining to the environmental aspects of this project was posted and filed with the County Clerk on November 16, 1976 with no protest received, and this Board, as ex-officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District determines that this project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and the Director of Planning shall file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifications are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on December 21, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. and the Clerk of this Board is directed to publish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law inviting, bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the LAFAYETT- SUN PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on November 30, 1976. Originator: P. W. Dept. (Bldgs & Grnds) cc: Public Works Department Agenda Clerk Building Projects County Auditor-Controller June Dye County Administrator Director of Planning RESOLUTION NO. 7611040 00049 r ) f� .-.- w... ... n .. r. i. w..q.. ..r,. x r, .:.:,: ,.,. ,,. a a, ..sYr...... ,•�", Jn.:S" r .... r e P . Y , x wr'S WKS J.,3'v DIVISION A. NOTICE TO CON71' +CTOR (Advertisement) Notice is hereby given by order of the Board- of Super- visors of Contra Costa County, that Clerk of said Board will receive bids for the furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, transpor- tation and services for Fire College Site Imnrovements, Phases V & VI, 2955 Treat Boulevard, Concord, California The estimated construction contract cost (Base •Bid) is $ 130,500 Each bid is to be in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications on file at the Office of -the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Room 103, County Administration Building, ;•fartinez, California.. The drawings and specifications may be examined at the office of the Clerk "of the Board of Supervisors or at the Public tdork§ Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building. Plans and specifications may be obtained at the Public Works Departr�2nt, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, upon payment of a printing and service charge in the amount of $3.20 (sales tax in- cluded) which amount shall not be refun6zb e. Checks shall be made payable to the "County of Contra Gosta-, and shall be mailed to the Public V orks Department, 5th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, California 014553. Technical questions regarding the contract documents should be directed to the Building Projects Division. Their telephone number is (415) 372-2146. Each bid shall be made on a bid form to be obtained at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, and must be accompanied by a certified cashier's check or checks, or bid bond in the amount of the ten percent (1(7.) of the base bid amount, made payable to the order of "The County of Contra Costa" and shall be sealed and filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Bid proposals shall be submitted to the Chief Clerk of the Board of Supervisors on or before December 21, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. and will be opened in public at the time due in the Board of Super- visors' Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Contra Costa County, California, and there read and recorded. The above-mentioned bid security shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a Contract if awarded the piork, and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by the County if the successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Con- tract or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to do so by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. • Microfilmed with board-order 00UIJ0 -3- D1VISION A. NOTICE TO CONTMCTOR (continued) The successful bidder will be required to furnish a labor and tiaterial Bond in an a::ojnt equal to fifty percent (50%) of the Contract price and a Faithful Performance Bond in an amount equal to one hundred-percent (1007.) of the Contract price, said bonds to be secured from a Surety Company authorized to do business in the State of California. Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to the Statutes of the State of California, or local law applicable thereto, the said Board has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and rates for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each type of workman or mechanic re- quired to execute the contract which will be awarded to the successful " bidder. The prevailing rate of per diem wages is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. In. all projects over $50,000 the Contractor shall be re- quired to submit for county approval an Affirmative Action Plan (see Division E). The said Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids or any portion of any bid and/or waive any irregularity in any bid received. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty days after the date set for opening thereof. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY By J. R. OLSSUN County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Super- visors, Contra Costa County, California By .);I. Pte_ Deputy DATED: NOV ' 01916 PUBLICATION DATES: Rev. 5/76 00051 —k— a (bidder). llI1►ISIO.� C. PRO?'OSAL (Bid Form) LIDS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL day of _December, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. , in Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California, 94553. - (A) TO T11E HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COVrRA COSTA COU14TY: Gentlemen: The' undersigned hereby proposes and agrees *to furnish any and all required labor, material, -transportation, and services for Eire Cnllege Site Tmprovemenp- Phases V h Treat Rnu1�y�•�rd. Go -Ca i rnia rnity in strict coniowith the flans, Specifi•caCicns, and other con- tract docturents on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, First floor, administration Building, Martinez, Cali- fornia 94553, for the following sums; namely: BASE BID: Shall include all of the wort: for the construction. and com- pletion of all facilities therein, but not including any of the wer!c in the following Alternates: For the sura of: Dollars ($ ) ALTERWiTES: 1. ALTERMATE NO. 1: State the amount to be added to the Base Bid for the Mock-up area Add the sum of: Dollars ($ ) 2, ALTERNATE NO. 2: State the amount to be added to the Base Bid for the Skid Pad Add the sun of: Dollars ($ ) (B) It is understood that this bid is based upon completion of the work within Sixty (60) calendar days from and after the date of commencement. . 00052 F: da r+,c:..3`-'k»a.,,>,;xs.•.._., a.fie } It is understood, with due allowances made for unavoidable delays, that if the Contractor should fail to complete the work of-the contract within the stipulated thie, then, he shall be liable to the Ovner in the amount of Seventy Five Dollars ($75.00) per calendar clay for each day said work remains uncompleted beyond the time for completion, as and for liq- uidated damages and not as a penalty, it being'agreed and ex- pressly stipulated that it would be impractical and difficult to fix the actual amount of damage. (D) The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Plans, Specifications and other contract documents and the local conditions at the place _ where the work is to be done. (E) The undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the Board of Supervisors will not be re- sponsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the under- signed in making up this bid. • -ll= , -00053 DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Bid Form) continued (F) The undersigned hereby certifies that this bid is genuine and not sham or collusive. or made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named, and that the undersigned has not directly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid, or any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from bidding, and that the undersigned has not in any manner, sought by collusion to secure for him- self an advantage over any other bidder. (G) Attached is a list of the names and locations of the place of business of the subcontractors. (H) Attached is bid security as required in the Notice to Contractors. n Cash o Bidders Bond C Cashiers Check OCertified Check (1) The following addenda are hereby acknowledged as being in- cluded in the bid: Addendum# dated Addendum# dated Addendum # dated Firm By Title Address Phone Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registra- tion of Contractors, Classification and License No. Dated this day of 19 ,Rev..5/76 -12- 00054 { DIVISION C. PROPOSAL-BID-FORM continued LIST OF SPBrAIN"TRAMORS: (As required by Division B, Section 4, Paragraph (c)) (Substitution of listed subcontractors: See Division E., Section 6, Paragraph E.). Portion of Stork Jame Place of Bidders -13- 0005- r SPECIFICATIONS FOR ETRE COLI FGE ST•T TMPROVEIIERTS - PHtiSES V & VT 2955 Treat Boulevard Concords California Prepared by DeBolt Civil Engineering 401 South Hartz Avenue Danville, California 94526 F J. R.0,=N a_Rx sow a=suR•iW2 rwA cosy, Prepared for Public Works Department Contra Costa County Sixth Floor Administration Building Martinez, California ' Microfilmed with board ord" 0005.5 AIMT. (OF CONTEi:FS r DIVISION A. Notice to Contractors DIVISION B. Instructions to Bidders ' Section 1 Competence of Bidders •. Section 2 Securing Documents Section 3 Examination of Plans, Specifications, and Site of Work Section 4 State and County Labor and Materials - Requirement Section 5 Bidding Documents Section 6 Submission of Proposals Section 7 Withdrawal of Proposals Section 8 Public Opening of Proposals Section 9 Irregular Proposals Section 10 Competitive Bidding Section 11 Ai-ard of Contract Section 12 Special Requirements Section 13 Exectuion of Contract Section 14 Failure to Execute Contract DIVISION C. Proposal (Bid Form) DIVISION D. Articles of Agreement DIVISION E. Equal Employment Opportunity DIVISION F. General Conditions Section 1 Definitions Section 2 Governing Laws and Regulations Section 3 Patents and Royalties Section 4 Contractor's Responsibility for Work and Public Utilities Section 5 Bond and Insurance Section 6 Subcontracting Section 7 Time of Work and Damages Section 8 Progress Schedule . Section 9 Temporary Utilities and Facilities Section 10 Permits Section 11 Conduct of Work. Section 12 Responsibility for Site Conditions Section 13 Inspection Section 14 Rejection of Materials Section 15 I-nterpretation of Contract Requirements Section 16 Clarifications and Additional Instructions Section 17 Product and Reference Standards Section 18 Materials, Articles, and Equipment Section 19 Shop Drawings, Descriptive Data, Samples Alternatives -1- 00057 a DIVISION F. General Conditions continued , Section 20 Samples and Tests Section 21 Change Orders Section 22 Labor Section 23 Occupancy by the County prior to Acceptance Section 24 Preservation and Cleaning . Section 25 Payment of Federal or State Tares Section 26 Acceptance Section 27 Final Payment and Waiver to Claims Section 28 Guarantees DIVISION G. Special Conditions DIVISION H. Technical Conditions Section 1 Clearing and Grubbing and Earthwork Section 2 Water Lines and Appurtenances Section 3 Storm Sewer and Appurtenances Section44 Sub-Grade Preparation Section 5 Subbase Section 6 Base Section 7 Asphalt Concrete Section 8 Striping Section• 9 Portland Cement Concrete Section 10 Metal Building -2- 00058 �3 ii Y rH DIUSION A. NOTICE. TO CONTI'VICTUR (Advertisement) Notice is hereby given by order of the Board- of Super- visors of Contra Costa County, that Clerk of said Board will receive bids for the furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, transpor- tation and services for Fire College Site improvements. Phases V & VI, 2955 Treat Boulevard, Concord, California The estimated construction contract cost (Base Bid) is $ 130,500 Each bid is to be in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications on file at the Office of -the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Room 103, County Administration Building, Martinez, California.- The drawings and specifications may be examined at the office of the Clerk -of the Board of Supervisors or at the Public Vdorks Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building. Plans and specifications r,:ay be obtained at the Public Works Departm2nt, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, upon payment of a printing, and service charge in the amount of $3.20 (sales tar, in- cluded) which amount shall not be refundcb c. Checks shall be made payable to the "County of Contra Costa'', and shall be mailed to the Public ::Forks Department, 5th Floor, administration Building, Martinez, California 94553. Technical questions regarding the contract documents should be directed to the Building Projects Division. Their telephone number is (415) 372-2146. Each bid sha U be made on a bid form to be obtained at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, and must be accompanied by a certified cashier's check or checks, or bid bond in the amount of the ten percent (10%) of the base bid amount, made payable to the order of "The County of Contra Costa" and shall be sealed and filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Bid proposals shall be submitted to the Chief Clerk of the Board of Supervisors on or before December 21. 1976 at 11:00 a.m. and will be opened in public at the time due in the Board of Super- visors` Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Contra Costa County, California, and there read and recorded. The above-mentioned bid security shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a Contract if awarded the york, and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by the County if the successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Con- tract or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to do so by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, 00059 -3- i DIVISION A. NOTICE TO ChiiTRACTOR (continued), The successful bidder will be required to'furnish a labor and Material Bond in an amojnt equal to fifty percent (50a) of the Contract price and a Faithful Performance Bond in an amount equal to one hundred-percent (1007.) of the Contract price, said bonds to be secured from a Surety Company authorized to do business in the State of California. Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to the Statutes of the State of California, or local law applicable thereto, the said Board has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and rates for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which this wort: is to be performed for each type of workman or mechanic re- quired to execute the contract which will be awarded to the successful bidder. The prevailing rate of per diem wages is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. In. all projects over $50,000 the Contractor shall be re- quired to submit for county approval an Affirmative Action Plan (see Division E) . The said Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids or any portion of any bid and/or waive any irregularity in any bid received. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty : days after the date set for opening thereof. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY By J. R. ULSso County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Super- visors, Contra Costa County, California By Deputy DATED: PUBLICATION DATES: Rev. 5/76 00060 -4- CORRECTION SHEET The following corrections shall be made part of the Contract Documents and clarifies the Contract Documents as noted. Page 6. Section 3 (b) - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 6. Section 3 (c) - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 6. Section 4 (e) - Reference to "Section C" shall be corrected to "Division V. Page 7. Section 4 (c) - Reference to "Section 1 of Division E" shall be corrected to "Section 6 of Division F". Page 8. Section 11 - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 9. Section 12 - Reference to "Section D" shall be corrected to "Division D" Page 12. Paragraphs (f), (G), (H), and (I) shall be corrected to 5, 6, 7, and 8 respectively. Page 15. "Section E" shall be corrected to "Division E". Page 14, 14a, 14b, 14c. Division D - Change revision date at lower left hand corner to Rev. 12/73. Page 21. Section E, Subcontractor's Certification (3); Delete paragraph beneath signature line requiring written authorization by County. Page 1. Table of Contents Division B - Instruction to Bidders - Delete Section 4 and reduce by one all subsequent section numbers. -4a- 00061 DIVISION B. INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS- The bidder shall carefully examine the instructions con- tained herein and satisfy himself as to the conditions with which he must comply prior to bid in submitting his proposal, and to the conditions affecting the award of contract. SECTION 1. COMPETENCE OF BIDDERS: (a) License: No bidder may bid on work of a kind for which he is not properly licensed, and any such bid received may be disregarded. (c) Bidders shall be experienced in the type of work for which they are bidding and shall, upon request of the County, submit to the County a written list of completed projects, with the name of the owner or contract officer indicated. SECTION 2. SECURING DOCUMENTS: (a) Drawings and Specifications may be secured at the place and for the deposit or fee as called out in the "Notice to Contractor", page 3. (b) The deposit, if called for in the "Notice to Contractor page 3, is a guarantee that the Drawings and Specifi-cations will be returned in good condition. (c) The fee, if called for in the "Notice to Contractor", page 3, is a non-refundable payment to defray a portion of the print- ing and handling costs. SECTION 3. E.4&4INaTION OF PLs_%S. SPECIFICATIONS, AND SITE OF THE WORK: (a) CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY: The bidders shall examine carefully the site of the wrk. and the plans and specifications therefor. He shall investigate and satisfy himself as to conditions to be encountered, the character, quality, and quantity of surface, and subsurface materials or obstacles to be encountered, the work to be performed, and materials to be furn- ished, and as to the requirements of the proposal, plans, and specifi- cations of the contract. Where investigations of subsurface conditions have been made by the County in respect to foundation or other structural design, and that information is shown in the plans, said information represents only the statement by the County as to the character of material which has been actually encountered by it in its investigation, and is only included for the convenience of bidders. Investigations of subsurface conditions are made for the purpose of design, and the County assumes no responsibility whatever in respect to the sufficiency or accuracy of borings, or of the log of test borings, or other preliminary investigations, or of the interpre- tation therefor. S_ Rev. 5.76 • 00062 3, INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS (continued) There is no guarantee or warranty, either express or implied, that the conditions indicated are representative of those existing throughout the work, or any part of it, or that unlooked for developments may not occur. Making such informa- tion available to bidders is not to be construed in any waas a waiver of the provisions.of this article concerning the U- tractor's responsibility for subsurface conditions, and bidders must satisfy themselves through their own investigations as to the actual conditions to be encountered. (b) RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES: As part of the responsibility stated in subdivision (a) above, and without limitation thereon, the Contractor shall be responsible at his own cost for any and all work, expense or special precautions caused or required by the existence of proximity of utilities encountered in performing the work, in- cluding without limitation thereon, repair of any or all damage and all hand or exploratory excavation required. The bidder is cuationed that such utilities may include communication cables or electrical cables which may be high voltage, and the ducts enclosing such cables, and when working or excavating in the vicinity thereof, the special precautions to be observed at his own cost shall also include the following: All such cables and their enclosure ducts shall be exposed by careful hand excava- tion so as not to damage the ducts or cables, nor cause injury to persons, and suitable warning signs, barricades, and safety devices shall be erected as necessary or required. In connection with the foregoing, the bidder's attention is invited to Section 12 of Division E of these specifications. (c) DISCREPANCIES OR ERRORS: If omissions, discrepancies, or apparent errors are found in the plans and specifications prior to the date of bid opening, the bidder shall submit a written request for a clari- fication which will be given in the form of addenda to all bid- ders if time permits. Otherwise, in figuring the work, the bid- ders shall consider that any discrepancies or conflict between drawings and specifications shall be governed by Section 15 of Divas:... r if these specifications. SECTION 4. BIDDING DOCUMENTS (a) Bids shall be made upon the special Proposal (Bid Form) (See Section C of this Specification), with all items completely filled out; numbers shall be stated both in writing and in figures, the signatures of all persons signed shall be in longhand. The com- pleted form should be without interlineations, alterations or erasures, no alternative proposals. Additional copies of the Proposal (Bid Form) may be obtained from those supplying these specifications. Rev. S'75 -6- A E ONW =i SECTION 4. BIDDING DOCUMWrS (continued) (b) Bids shall not contain any recapitulation of the work to be done; alternative proposals will not be consid- ered, unless called for., No oral, telegraphic or telephonic proposals or modifications will be considered. (c) List of Promo seed Subcontractors: Each proposal shall have listed-Tierein the nameani ref each subcon- tractor to whom the bidder proposes to subcontract portions of the Work in an amount in excess of � of 1 percent of his total bid, in accordance with Chapter 2. Division S, Title 1, of the Government Code. See Section 1 of Division E of these specifications for further reference to subcontractors. (d) Bidder's Secy: All bids shall have enclosed cash, a cashier's eTec , ceerrcii����eedd check or a bidder's bond, as �eseribe below.� —executed as surety-� corpora[�ut�orized to issue surety bonds in the Slate of California, made payable to "Contra Costa County", in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the amount of the bid. No bid shall be considered unless one of the forms of bidder's security is enclosed therewith. SECTION 5. SUBMSSION OF PROPOSALS: • Proposals shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County at the place indicated on the bid proposal. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to see that his bid is received in proper time. All proposals shall be submitted under sealed cover. plainly identified as a proposal for the work being bid upon and addressed as directed in the Notice to Contractors and the bid P Failure to do so may result in a premature opening of, or a failure to open such bid. Proposals which are not properly marked may be disregarded. SECTION 6, WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS: Any bid may be withdrawn at any time prior to the time fixed in the public notice for the opening of bids, provided that a request in writing, executed by the bidder or his duly authorized representative, for the withdrawal of such bid is filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. An oral. tele&L& hie, or telephonic r�uesc to withdraw a b ro osaT not acceptable. The Zit t rawal o a ies not pre ud ce t e rZ [ o a bidder to file a new bid. This article does not authorize the withdrawal of any bid after the tine fixed in the public notice for the opening of bids. Rev. 5/76 -7- • . . 0006`1 ro ,. SECTION 7. PUBLIC OPENING OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be publicly opened and read at the time and place indicated in the Notice to Contractors. Bidders or their authorized agents are invited to be present. SECTION 8, IRREGULAR PROPOSALS: Proposals may be rejected if they show any alter- ation of form, additions not called for, conditional bids, in- complete bids, erasures, or irregularities of any kind. If bid amount is changed after the amount is originally inserted, the change should be initialed. The County also reserves the right to accept any or all alternates and unit prices called for on the Bid Form and their order of listing on such form shall in no way indicate the order in which the bids may be accepted. SECTION 9, COMPETITIVE BIDDING: if more than one proposal be offered by any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or any combination thereof, under the same or different names, all such proposals may be rejected. A party who has quoted prices on materials or work to a bidder is not thereby disqualified from quoting prices to other bidders, or from submitting a bid directly for the materials or work. All bidders are put on notice that any collusive agree- ment fixing the prices to be bid so as to control or affect the awarding of this contract is in violation of the competitive bidding requirements of the State lav and may render void any contract let under such circumstances. SECTION 10, AWARD OF CONTRACT: The right is reserved to reject any and all proposals. The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest responsible bidder whose proposal complies with all the requirements prescribed. Such award, if made, will br made within 30 days after the opening of the proposals. SECTION 11. SPECIAL REQUIRENEh"rS: The bidder's attention is invited to the following spec- ial provisions of the contract, all of which are detailed in the General Conditions (Division E) or other documents included in these specifications. (a) Bonds (b) Insurance (c) Liquidated Damages (d) Guarantee (e) Inspection and Testing of Haterials (f) Facilities to be Provided at Site (g) Assignment of Contract Prohibited Rev, 5/76 00065 k$ VC SECTION 12. EXECUTION OF CONTRACT: The contract (example in Section D) shall be signed by the successful bidder in duplicate counterpart and returned within five (5) days of receipt, not including Satur- days, Sundays, and legal holidays, together with the Contract Bonds and Certificates of Insurance. No contract shall be binding upon the County until same has been executed by the Con- tractor and the County. Should the Contractor begin work in advance of receiving notice that the contract has been approved as above provided, any work performed by him will be at his own risk and as a volunteer unless said contract is so approved. SECTION 13. FAILURE TO EXECUTE CONTRACT: Failure to execute a contract and file accept- able bonds and certificates of insurance as provided herein within 10 days, not including Saturdays. Sundays, and legal holidays, after the successfsl bidder has received the contract for execution shall be just cause for the annulment of the award and the forfeit- ure of the bidder's security. If the successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract, the County may award the contract to the second lowest responsible bidder. If the second lowest respon- sible bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract, the County may award the contract to the third lowest responsible bidder. On the failure or refusal of the second or third lowest responsible bidder to whom any such contract Is so awarded to execute the same, • such bidders' securities shall be likewise forfeited to the County. The work may then be readvertised or may be constructed by day labor as pro+ided by State law. Rev. 5176 _9 _ 0 00066 J �j i-3 'DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Bid Fnrtn) BIDS {•:ILL BE 1t :CElVED UeZUIL day of December. 1976 at 11:00 a.m. , in Rooin 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California, 94553. - (A) TO T1IE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Gentlemen: The-undersigned hereby proposes and agrees 'to furnish any and all required labor, material, -transportation, and services for moire ColgPe Site m2rovements, Phases V & Vi, 2955 Treat Boulevard- oncnrd- Califo-rnia in strict conEorrity u ith the Plans, Specifications, and other con- tract dociLTents on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, first Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, Cali- fornia 94553, for the following su:iis; namely: 13ASE BID: Shall include all of the wort: for the construction. and com- pletion of all facilities therein, but not including any of the wort: in the following Alternates: For the sum of: Dollars ($ ) ALTERNATES: 1. ALTERNATE NO. 1: State the amount to be added to the Base Bid for the Mock—up area Add the sum of: Dollars ($ ) 2. ALTERNATE NO. 2: State the amount to be added to the Base Bid for the Skid Pad Add the sum of: Dollars ($ ) (B) It is understood that this bid is based upon completion of the work within Sixty (60) calendar days from and after the date of commencement. , • -lo- - 00067 I It is understood, with due allow.noes nnde for unavoidable delays, that if the Contractor should fail to cc^plete the work of•the contract within the stipulated this, then, he shall be liable to the Owner in the amount of Seventy Five Dollars ($75.00) per calendar day for each day said work remains uncompleted beyond the time for coi:iplction; as and for liq- uidated damages and not as a penalty, it being -agreed and ex- pressly stipulated that it would be impractical and difficult to fix the actual amount of damage. (D) The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Plans, Specifications and other contract• documents and the local conditions at the place where the work is to be done. (E) The undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the Board of Supervisors will not be re- sponsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the under- signed in Waking up this bid. • -11= .00068 'R . DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Bid Form) continued (F) The undersigned hereby certifies that this bid is genuine and not sham or collusive, or made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named, and that the undersigned has not directly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid, or any other person, firm, or corponration to refrain from bidding, and that the undersigned has ot in any manner, sought by collusion to secure for him- self an advantage over any other bidder. (G) Attached is a list of the names and locations of the place of business of the subcontractors. (H) Attached is bid security as required in the Notice to Contractors. a Cash O Bidders Bond a Cashiers Check OCertified Check (I) The following addenda are hereby acknowledged as being in- cluded in the bid: Addendum# dated • Addendum # _ dated Addendum # dited Firm By Title Address Phone Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registra- tion of Contractors, Classification and License No. Dated this day of , 19 Hev..5176 -12- 00069 i DIVISION C, PROPOSAL BID FORM continued LIST OF StTBCO\TRACTORS: (As required by Division B. Section 4, Paragraph (c)) (Substitution of listed subcontractors: See Division E., Section 6, Paragraph E.). Portion of Work Name Place of Bidders 00070 B j DIV25ION D• AMCIFS OF AGREDG r (Contract:) COnIRACI (C...tr.ctlo. as......U (Contra Costa Ce.nty Standard Form) 1. rAN1A3:ES. Ihese variables are l.c&tporated below by reference. ({{2,3) fcrtie.. [P.blic Aa.-71 [Coat...Co.) (12) fffectire Date: [See {c for startins date.) (13) rhe cork: ({k) Co42etio.:i.r. - [strlke wt (a) er (►) 'cale.d"' Of 'wsrk1s5"1 to) By [date] (►) eltbis .'cale.dari—skins days fro. starting date, (53) Liq} idate3 Davage.: S Pat calendar day. • ({g) Public Agency's Agent: ({7) Contract !rice: S (fer•ualt price contracts: note or leas, !■ accorduce mita [t.l.sea puantitiei ac ..ic bid prices.) [Strike ort pare.tbeti<al material i[ lsapplica►le.) 2. SIGNAT7NES t ACESOCL::/tfl r. flblic Age—. ST: (rtealdeat or Chairman) (Secretary) Cent—tor, heresy also •ck...I.dgl.R &rare.... of and ...P11—c. with Labor Code 11661 cescer.ing cotkne.'s Compensation Law. by- [Designate official capacity is the bust.." Note to Contractor. f1) freer..aakaovledp+rat fors below; and tIJ if a corpora- tion, at.ceh a certified cc;? of ike «atana, or o! ts✓ —solution of the board of Directors aathariaing erecrticn of this 01.1r3at and of the bonds reg.irrd %.e,,b.— ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State e! G11fer.la ) ss. ACN:iO3rlEDC)!ENr (►r Corporation. Censi7 of I partnership, or Individual) The Far...(a) .1gaeg above for Contractor, knows to ae In individual and business cap►c1t7 as •rated, Drraoea317 appeared ►.fore me today and actsor LdRed that be/they executed SL and that c►e toIperatioa er p:It....hip ....d above ♦secured It. Dated. _ (SEAL) %story r.b:tc ___________________________________-__----_-____-._-_______--__-___-_------r__--_-_-_----- FOOT Ayr ROILD: J. 2. CLAUSE%. Cau.ty C..n.el, t. __Deputy (page 2 of 4) Rev- 12%72 -14- 3. WORK COYTRACT. "AS-ES. (a) Ifs their sfguRcarer In S<ctlo. 2. et tett/re ow tAe above dale, CEOs. tarn<s Proalee aa41 spare as ret forth la this eoatraet, {eco r►e cactag by Ch ; tete...aces ibe "serial (`rarlables`) !n Sec. 1. (b) esattac[or •hall, at bt[ ova coat aad ......... an; 1. a rortusliie .inns..... Irilr aed taltbfwlly O�rtor. end co.plrte this work; •.A .111 fur.fah all matertals. Tabery eer,f<es aad trans po rt atloo :ecea eery, *oa,.nleat and rrep— in order fairly to garter. tA• r.iul..,.amt. of this M , all serf Oily 3n accordance with the h►Ric Aienq'a pl•t)a, it+r lags and •pati ficatioos, (e) Thls rs rk can ►e efi cope! sa1T rlth 'pubtic Age.eT't para.. vrletea Dada.. speclf9tnp soeA Ohmage and !ts coax "good to by tee D+r[let; end the Pvhlxc Agency *hall never have [o yat sere ihan apecLIM fa Sec. 7 wlthoui each as Order. L. TIME: SOTICE TO PROCEED. Co.tsaccar shall start thin work as dl eeccsd to cbe apac!- fle.tlons ar the Nott.. to Proceed. and shall cotPle[e !t +a syeeilled la Sec. A. S. L10CIDw7ED DAMAGES. It the Contractor falls to castle%, this cO.tv.,t and this work rleblt the [ane flied therefor. allevaace beteg wade for coatln4taclr• s y[o rtdod here!:, be becomes ll.ble ;o tEe Publit A4 atcT for all !ta loss and dawape tArrsf roe; and bec+usa, [..aa the sale[. of the case, St !t cad u111 ►e topraccicablr aad eatr.aelr dilflcult to u eeriafa aad /Sa rte tnSllc Apra.?'• actual da.a4e f[o. soy delay la p:i%4I1fL' hereof. it Is •greed shot CO.J_Cer will par as lil.1dae•d loupes 1. tb. 'public Ageacy PAs re eaoa able .ua apeclfle! Ica Sec, t, the ...•cast of the parts.•' reasonable ead....r to .s[1aa[e Sa1r areragr c:apeas+tloa x6e[eta r. for racA .:tend:[ d.T'. dela? to it:lshlo$ Wald nark; and if tAe ass. be not paid, Public Apo cT uy, !a adGlCIO. to 1[s other re.edfrs;'do dect th. sane from nay .may due or So become due Contractor uwder chi• coa- teaee. IIL tubllc As...T for say .aua am[borf res or conerfbuLes to a 41.2.1. suspee- •ion of :ori or en onion of [!u, tis lura plow shall be •dd.d to the •lar •!Roue; [or cempletlom, hot 11 shall not be ;caned ■waiver mor be need to defeat ass rig b' of the ♦prat] to ;..apes pow now-.ostia Rem or leis? beterade r. Por.eia[ In Ge��assn[ Cod. Sec. 4213, the Contractor .!,all not br assessed 1lpwldated dung.. for delay !n compla sloe of the Teri, auca eels] ru owed by the taller. of the tub IIc Ages.. oz the ovear of atilit7 to yre,f de Lor removal er re lou[!o. •! Oaf•ciag utllpty 1+.111[Ls. 6. IRTE6KATED DOCMIESTS. Th. plats, 411-1:4• aad •pecill catieee, of am 'public Aga:cT's • Call for bids, and Cant vac tar's accreted b!d for tats wort are h.rrb7 So1orpors tad Into Ch is contract: aad the? •re Intended to co-:►.rate, so that anything .shlbtt*d to eh. plana or drsvfeg• aad not sea[loned fa One s Pacification•, or rice versa, 1. to be eaecated ea ff eabiblied, meK lone; and set tort: !a ►ata, to tae [rue In cant red weaalaR t►ereol vies cakes ell Lotethez: and dl1ler.uces of opinion cotcernlag Lbue •ball b. litmlly 41eteratned Ly Pnbllc Age.cy'. Agent specified I. Sec. 1. 7. PATMEST. (a) Par bI. strlc[ aad )iteral tu11111m..t sI [hue preslsra aeQ coaditfow, aad a• gull ...Pa.s.efon for all tbls work, the Pnbllc A'%1t •salt pal tAt Ceaeractor Ch rp ap•clfied fa Sec. 2. aacgI that 1. wit price coattacts tA• psTs.at 'bell be ter finished ouuiltles at —It ►!d prices. (b) On or about the firs[ d:11. ay of each ulesdar month [he Contractor ■hall •.bolt to Ch* Public AgetcT a re rifled apPll call:. for payaen[, supported Yy • atataent aAov{og all uLe tial► ac[aallT 1aa[aIled dutl.g the preced/mg mot[., the lobo.. cap ods; tMefees, and the coat tAe[col; vbereaaoa, atter chmckln4, [be Pnbllc A4ea.T •ball leen. to Cost...for a certlflcate for rhe +.ornt dote raped to be due, .1.us 102 thereof par. to Co.e.....t Code Sec. 31067, but not wet11 d.fectire work and material+ bee. bean r:..--d. replaced and wade goad. a. PATMES:S WITMRESD. (a) The tubilc Aj.scT ar !t. ag of any rltbheld anT POT...t, os iee—se oI lacer discoverer ..!dente ..1111? +11 or asT rerctllca[e for paTuat, to 6u9b Onset[ aaC period of tine om1T as may be man eea.ry to protect the Pu►lCc Agency from lou bats as :f: (1) De tact,,* wort not re.edled, er aacosplet.d (2) Miss lllr41 or rear..►le erfdeace lmdlcacing probable fillet, (3) Pailar• to properly pay sub...tractor• or for a+terl+l er labor, (a) Lessou+ble doubt that Ells roti chs be eeapletsd for t►e ►slaw.. thea wpald, tr (S) Damge co snarler contractor. (b)"Th- pu►11c Ag..eT •ea23 use ..at::able 4113goce to dlaceeer and repave to the Co.tractoc. a. [b. seri Jlogtet eet. ria utrt3•la aed lobo[ which ere tet ea[lslan ... to St, .o at to +ratQ . . .•.r. ...able er test [e tae Contractor 1. .ak1w4 good amy defective roti er pea ts.e (e) 3$ calendar dors It., the Public Ag•.CT f11e2 its so[fce Of cauPlvtion of the ..stir. trop. l of A) -14a- REV. 12/72 q� l 000'72 ..t .r i vett. 1t a\all issue a c<rt1llut• to the Contractor and p•f its b:laec< o[ the contrut price at deductiar all uowts v![Ahe ld wQer tAis ..ecru t, pro rlQrd ch Contractor Chown th•c all eL1as for labor a sate rf ala have b<•n yard. no .logo• be.. been preaeaLed to the Fab11c Arsec7 bu ed os acro or oa3u ion♦ of the Co ntractar, and no 11<ns or vlthholI antic.. h••r been 111eQ ag alnst rhe work or site, and prarlGed there ate ao[ r<asoaab2e indications of detectlre or aLalnr wort or of lace-recorded ooticw of liras or clalas against Contractor. 9. IXSVRASCE. (Labor Code f{2860-61) On afgnlag this contract. Cc Itia.tor .use sive Public Agency ll) • ce,tit lcacs of consent to calf-I.sura Issued by cb. Dire c[or of Industrial Relatloas. or l2) • ur if ficate of :arks en's [nape na•clon insurance I wed by as •dui iced lasurer, or (3) as coact ceyy or duyllcatr ihsrea! tertifled by the Director er t►e insurer. contractor to Aware of sad coapll.s with Labor Cade S.C. 3700 and chs L'ozkae.'. Caaprae.ties Law. _ 10. 2OXDS. On meal&& this contract Caetrac[or •\all drl3vrr to Public Agency :or •pD re.&I good and sulficlrat bonds vita aurKfea, la aaount(s) aprcif led In the sy aif l= carie.., guaraateelag his faithful Penn...... oT this contra.[ and bio payas.t [or s21 labor sed faterlela bare S.C. 11. FAILCRE TO PERFOIN. If the Coatractor at env time refuse• or SCSIs Ccs, without fault of the Public Areacr or !ta ateet(a), to supply su!ltcie a aster Ule or uetka•a [o eoaplete chis •treeseat and work •s prorideG Gsrr:a, for • yerlod o[ 30 days or novo after v rit[ea notice [hereof by the pablle Agency. the Prblle Agency nay furnish ■ane sad deduct the reaaoaable espeases t6ateoI icon Che coatrsct prlcr. 32. LAOS APPLL. Gaeeral. loth patties ruotaitr the app licabllley of various federal, sure amd local laws sad reg ulationa, especlallr CAap[er 1 0! Part 7 of tAe C•1,T.rota Labor Code (begl.alag with Ssc. 2720, sad Secludlnt Sacs. 1775 L 1171.6 lorbiddtnr dts- etlalnatlon) snG intend Lha[ tLla arreensat coap23rs therevlth. Zbs parties sDrclttully •t 1palaLe t'.1 Lhe teleraaC pcnaltles end f.rfClL.... pro•t6ed !o Abe Labor Co Ge, esD<cially It. S....'1715 6 1&13, concerning prerailier .,gas sad hours, .11.11 apyly to t\Ss ag ceeaeet •• though fully stipulated herein. 1]. S^.IICOXTiACZORS. Gowrna.at Cod. 164100-4113 ate lacorp...Cad hsrela. 14. CAGE RATES. (a) Pueauaet to Labot Ca dr Sec. 1777, the Sovsrning body et the Public Agency has ascertaln<d Che gteeral preva111er races of wages per dlea, sad to bollday sad o•ertiae cork, la the io ulliy !a which this work !s to be performed, fec eacb craft, el•eei flcailoe, er type o/ vorkaaa needed to •arcate Ebts contract, sed sold races are as specified to t" call for ►!ds for this work •.d are on file with the tubllc Agency, and are hereby lncocyoraied her•ie. (h) This acbedul. of vesaa to based on • woe►lag day o! r Lours ualra• otherwlss apeei[led; and th< dally rale 1> sae hourly rate multiplied by the ansa bee of boors con- stltutlag the wotkl.g day. Che. less than tbst nu.brr of hours are worked, the daily wags rate 1. pr.partio.ately reduced. but Lee Ao n.IT rate ranine as at au d. (e) Thr Cost vac tor, and all kis nub cont.•.tors, oust pay ae less[ thea. races [o all pe pons oa thSs wo A, inc2udfer all crave 2, wbsiste.cr, asG Irtore benefit pay.ente provided for b. a►pllc!bI. cellettl.. bargatotar agr.enents. A3! sk113ed tabor not listed a►oar aaa be yaid at least t\e wee scale <acabllahed be collective bar 11 arrera rot for ouch labor In the to u2lty where such vo r: 1s is/ng yerlorard. 1T le brconea o wry for L!e Coa[ractot or any avbcon[racror to aapley nay psrsow la a craft, clasatfi• eatI oe or type o! wort (eaca sa......e, nape r•l:ore. aloin tstrs[lre, Cie r lcal or other sea-aa.wl voCk.rs as such) for white au afnlaua care ret. is sI.Cift;d, the Contractor s\all lnsedlately mtlly the Public ♦ge.cy which shall promptly determine the Drev•Il,ng were rete there[or anG fwralsh the CanCcu tar with the .int.um race based thereon, which ah.11 apply fro. tae rise at the faltia2 <aplov+ant of the person affected and durinc the Castle. ... o! such ezpI.r mt. 15. rOtRS OF LAlJt. Eight ►e ora at lalor to ose caleedsr Qar Coe a l[uees a legal Say's cork. Aad a. caC:aan eap2ored at nay [tae on rota work by [Ae Cont[u[or or 47 a.y ub- coattaceor shall be rc"15. er D•C. ".d to w.'k to.[<r [!Crena escaDt as PCortded !n Labor Code Seca. 3&10-1&15. 16. APPREXTiCES. Prereelf indentured a;pr.nticrs a•y be rn plor.G on this work !n aeeardaace It. Labor Code Seca. 1777.), aad 177:.6 on non-dlscriaiaa[i.n. (rage 1 at c) Rev. 12,%72 -14b- 00073 j J r• 32 Ii: ParrEarxce Eik sATZRIALS. The to►lir Agent[ M+1 res a prose.. the lwdr{trtss amQ ecowowy of mantra Coca io u.[e. mad [►e Coat utter [hr more promises to esa tar produegf, vetisee, lab re rt and sethaafca of t►Sa Canncy la eery taco v►ere the pries, ltte..s and q mal![y are tq nal. 18. ASSIC^t1aT. this aRreeaeat 63nQs the bet re, ancceuors, a.alges, sad ceyrsssauc!•es of the Contractor; but he cuaet utlp 1L So whole or is pari, nor nap a0eles due er ce become due under It. without the yr for"titles cOnsaaI of the tub11C ASrnty ..3 the Cestracger's surety or sureties, males. tbly 6a re vP(..d 0otice et as at;+seat. 19. SO l:AITEg ST FrSLIC ACE TCT Iasp•ctlon of chs uozk aadtor mu•rial{, or aVpr.,al of work aidtot suer USa iasp•c[e d, or aca[ssent b• esy ofticez. assn[ or emy2 of•• of [R• tabllt Ateacy ladicating the work or nay part [merest cemp2l•s etch the ..qui women to of this contact, or acceptance of the whole or sal par[ o! maid .... aadtor utrrtata, of parsents tbrtefor, or any coebl natio. o[ recce acts, ae+ll eoc 11:1%.". iere [h• Contet of hie obligation to fatf►lt this centras[ as pewee:!►ed: mor .ball Lae tnbtic .,---c--eal be thereby e.cepped fro. brtagieg nal scc% ter dasagrt or entorceaeac attains tram rhe failure to coyly .1[h nal of the terga mad rendlttoss ►erect. 20. MOLD HkILUESS t INDEMNITY. (a) Conte+e[or:TC:*..":*:!:an to and shs11 held hardens asd 1.4—lfy free the Itabllities as drllwed !s tats atctlen. (b) The ladea.ttrea bees!itrd and protected by tbls proei.. are ebr tuD:!lAgeee• mad It. elects rt a.d appal.ttu ►e■rda. ton!..tons. ef[lce ra. +"rats e.0 sy loyesa. (c) The ltabilltlec protected easiest err uy ltablltcy or clam for damage et a klad ellegeQl/ —ti—d. Incurred or threatened because at actions dsEiasd below. toclv6ln" persesaI injury. death, property damage, larerar conda"&rise. or aal combination of these, regardless of whether or mer such ItaD!!lty, clue er damage wa{ mto..aes+bie et an. ciao before the County appro.ed the lapro•t.ewt piss or accepted the ispurts•atf ss towpltted. and fact.dtas the defense of any oust(:) or ac[lesls) ac lama or eq ul[7 coottznl.a [beer. . (d) The acct ems causing LSa►llit7 are asp act or e.issiem (aealfan[ of non- • wegliteac) Ss coaa.crime u1[b cbe .acre:• ':.trod by this coat...[ and atm►ucaDle to tat eoatrac[or, an►emnrnetar(a), or say mlficet(s). ago[(+) or taplolee(►) of ens or .ore of t►en. (e) Sao-conditions: The promise and sat testnt !■ tblt {er[i0a t{ nOt coadlcleaeQ or depradent oa whether or net nay Iadesal[er bmf prepared, supplied, er +ppcered sII• plan({) Or aye O.C.tl ma(.) 1n tOIIOttLiOn with [hlf vorh. has lnfwraacr Or other IOdtseif.catl06 carerlwg any o! thea. &argues, or char the alleged damage resulted partly eros any ..all gen[ .r v!llf cal ala<seduct of amp ladeasltee. (page t of =) Rev. 12!72 _14c_ • i 000'74 i .y. C : a , SSCTION E - LID CCLMI7IO3u AFFIMATII: AC-IOU il.UAL EhTW -7 OPPCe9I lir Part I: She provisions of this Part 1 apply to bidders, contractors and subcontractors with respect to those ccrztraction trades for which they are parties to collective bargaining agreements with a labor organization or organizations and who together with such labor organizations have agreed to the Tripartite Agreement for Contra Costa Ccunty, California (but only as to those trades as to which there are commitments by labor o ranizations to specific goals of minority manpower utilization) together with all implementing agreements that have been and may hereafter be developed pursuant thereto, all of which documents are incorporated herein by reference and are hereinafter emulatively referred to as the Contra Costa Plan. Any bidder, contractor or subcontractor usinv, one or rwry trades of construction employees must comply with either Part I or Part II of these Bid Conditions as to each such trade. Sbus, a bidder, contractor or subcontractor W be in compliance with these conditions by i_s inclusion, with its union, in the Contra Costa Plan a specific ecr✓eiL-,ert by that union to a goal of minority manpower utilization for such trade "A", the-reby reetinr, the provisions of this Part I, and by its connitrent to Part I: in reEani to trade^B" in the instance in which it is not included in the Con•.ra Costa Plan and, therefore, cannot meet the provisions of this Part I. To be eligible for award or a contract under Part I of this Invitation for Bids, a bidder or subcontractor must execute and submit as part of its bid ® the certification required by Part III hereof. Part II: . Coverape. She provision-, of this Part II shall be applicable to those bidders, contractors and subcontractors, who, in regard to those construction trades to be employed by thea on the project to which these bid conditions pertain. 1. Are not or hereafter cease to be signatories to the Contra Costa Plan referred to in Part I'hereof; 2. are signatories to the Contra Costa Plan but are not parties to collective bargaainin;agreements; ?. Are signatories to the Contra Costa Plan but are parties to collective bargaining a.;rarexre ats tdLh labor orgaaixatiors who anot or here- after cease to be signatories to the Contra Costa Plan. 4. Are siMatories to the Contra Costa Plan but as to which not specific cmmait+cnt to goals of minority rsanpower utilization by labor oreani- zation have been executed pursuant to the Contra Costa Plan; or Rev. 5/76 —15— O00 75 r j S. Are to longer participating in an affitrative action plan accep- table to the Director. OFCC, including the Centra Costa Plan. B. Reouirement --An Affirmative Action Plan. The bidders, contractors and suhrratractors described is paragraphs 1 through S above will not - eligible for r�ard of a contract ander this Invitation for lids, unless it certifies as prescribed in paragraph 2b of the certification specified in Part III hereof that it adopis the cfminta goals and timetables of minority manpower utilization._ and specific affirmative action steps set fourth in Section S.1 and 2 of •--his Part 11 directed at isreasing minority manpower utilization by means of applying good faith efforts to carrying out such steps or is deemed to have adopted such a program pur- suant to Section 3.3 of this Part It. loth the goals and timetables, and the affirmative action steps must meet the requirements of this Part 11 as set forth below for all trades which are to be utilized on the project, whether subcontracted or not. 1. Coals and Timetables. The goals of minority manpower utilization _ for the bidder and subcontractors are applicable to each trade not other- wise bound by the provisions of Part I hereof for the following time periods, for each trade which will be used cc :he project within Contra Costa County, California. The ranges for all trades to be utilized on the project shall be as follows: From 1QI/TL 17.05 - 19.5-9 In the event that u'der a contract which is subject to these Bid Con- ditions anv tort is performed in a year later than the latest year for which acceptable raa,.es of minority manpower utilization have been determined herein, the ram"for the perioJ 10/IM through 9/30/15 shall be applicable to such work. The percenta;es of minority manpower utilisation above are expressed in terms of zomhours of trairing and eoicyment as a proportion of the total nanhoura to be worked by the bidder's, ecatractor's and su'bcontractor's entire work force In that trade on all prviects in Contra Costa County, California during the performance cf its centraet or subcontract_ The nanhour3 for miner!ty work and training Hast be substantially uniform throughout the length of the contract, on all pro,'ects ani for ea-h of the t^ades. Further, the transfer of minority e=ployees or trainees from employer-to-employer or frcm project-to-project for the sole purpose or.retina the ccntrac_or's or suteentractor's goals shall be a r o:atica of these ccoditioes. 41 iunorit, s aetaned as:n„Iudinz 5esrods, Spanish Surnanei lrericanz, Orientals and imerican Indiana. Rev. 5/76 -16- 00076 and for each of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority employees or trainees from employer-to-employer or from project-to-project for the sole purpose of meeting the contractor's or subcontractor's goals shall be a violation of these conditions. In reaching the goals of minority manpower utilization required of bidders, contracters and subcontractors pursuant to this Part II, every effort shall be rade to find and employ qualified journeymen. However, where minority journeymen are not available, minority trainees in pre- apprenticeship, apprenticeship, journey--an training or other training programs may be used. In order that the nosnorking training Lours of trainees may be counted in meeting the goal, such trainees must be employeed by the con- tractor during the training period, the contractor asst have made a com- mitment to employ the trainees at the crpletioa of their training and the trainees must be trained pursuant to established training programs %,hich must be the equivalent of the training programs now or hereinafter provided for in the Contra Costa Plan with respect to the nature, extent and duration of training offered. A contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be in compliance with the terns and requirements of this Part II by the employment and training of minorities in the appropriate percentage of his aggregate work force in Contra Costa County, California for each trade for which it is co==itted to a gaal under this Part 11. However, na caarractor or subcontractor shall be found to be in - noncompliance solely on account of its failure to meet its goals within its timetables, but such contractor shall be given the opportunity to demonstrate that it has instituted all of the specific affirmativc action steps specified in this Par. 11 and has made every good faith effort to make these steps work toward the attainment of its goals within its time- tables, all to the purpose of expanding minority manpower utilization am . all of its projects is Contra Costa County, California. In all cases, the cczpliance of a bidder, contractor or subcon[rucar will be determined in accordance with its respective obligations under the terms of these Bid Conditions. Therefore, contractors or subcontractors who are governed by the provisions of this Part II shall be subject to the requirements of that Part regardless of the obligations of its prime con- tractor or lower tier subcontractors. • All bidders and all contractors and subcontractors performing or to - perform work on projects subject to these Bid Conditions hereby agree to inform their subcontractors of their respective obligations under the r----and rcquirmcnts of these Bid Conditions, including the provisions ... 'nag to goals of minority employment and training. Rev. 5/76 -17- 00077 ;,....,. 2. Syecific affirmative Action Steas. Bidders, contractors and subcoatrutors subject to this Pa.-t II, most engage in affirmative ac- tion directed at increasing minority==power utilization, which is at least as eztmzive and as specific-as the following steps: a. The contractor shall notify community organizations that the contractor has employment opportunities available and shall maintain records of the organizations' response. b. The contractor shall maintain a file of the napes and ad- dresses of each minority.worker refferred to him and what action was taken with respect to each such referred worker, and if the worker was not employed, the reasons therefor. If such worker was not sent to the union hiring hall for referral or if such worker was not employed by the contractor, the contractor's file shall document this and the reasons therefor. C. The contrattcr shall pruptly octify the MNMA CCSTA CWM pUB=jM=DSP:_RM _ when the union or unions with whom the contractor has a collective bargaining a.- ,reemant has not referred to the contractor a minority worker sent by the contractor or the contractor has other information that the union referral process has igmded him in his efforts to meet his goal. d. The contractor shall participate in-training programs in the area, especially those funded by the Department of Labor. e. The contractor shall disseminate his rD policy within his own organization by including it in any policy manual; by publicizing it in company newspapers. —al reports. etc.; by conducting staff, employee and union representatives' meetings.to exPlain and discuss the Policy; by posting of the policy; and-by specific review of the policy with minority employees. f. The contractor shall disseminate his EEO Policy externally by infotming and discussing it with all recruitment sources; by advertis- ing in news media, specifically including minority news media; and by notifying and discussing it with all subcontractors and suppliers. S. The contractor shall make specific and constant personal (both written and oral) recruitment efforts directed at all minority organizations, schools with minority students, minority recruitment organizations and minority training organizations within the contractor's recruitment area. h. The contractor sball make specific efforts to encourage present minority employees to recruit their friends and relatives. i. The contractor shall validate all man specifications, selec- tion requirements, tests, etc. Rev. 5/76 -18- a 000'78 k'9 ri rw J. The contractor shall make every effort to promote after- school. summer and vacation employment to minority youth. k. The contractor shall develop on-the-job training opportun- ities and participate and assist in any association or employer-group training programs relevant to the contractor's employee needs consistent with its obligations under this Part 11. 1. The contractor shall coatimially inventory mad evaluate all minority personnel for promotion opportunities and encourage minority m- ployees to seek such opportunities. m_ The contractor shall make sure that seniority practices job classifications, etc., do not have a discriminatory effect._ u. the contractor shall make certain that all facilities and company activities are non-segregated. o. The contractor shall continually monitor all personnel ac- uities to ensure that his EED policy is being carried out. p. the contractor shall solicit bids for subcontracts from available minority subcontractors engaged in the trades covered by these Bid Conditions, including circulation of minority contractor association. 3. Contractors and Subcontractors Deemed to be Bound by Part II. • In the event a contractor or subcontractor, who is at the time of bidding eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions, is no longer participating in an affirmative action plan acceptable to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance, including the Contra Costa Plan, he shall be deemed to be eomitted to Part 11 of these Bid Conditions. Further,vbm- ever a contractor or subcontractor,wbo at the time of bidding is eligible under Part n of these Bid Conditions, uses trades not contemplated at ' the time he submits his bid,be shall be committed to Part lI for those trades. L'henever a contractor or subcontractor is deemed to be committed to Part II of those Bid Conditions. he shall be considered to be caamicted to a manpower utilisation goal of the minimum percentage range for that trade for the appropriate year. " 6. Subsewent Sicnatory to the Contra Costa plan. Any contractor or subcontractor subject to the requirements of this Parc II for any trade at the time of the submission of his bid who together with the labor or-. ganization with whm it las a collective bargaining agreement subsequently becomes a signatory to the Contra Costa Plan. either individually or through. an associtation,nay meet its requirements under these Bid Conditions for such trade, if such contractor or subcontractor executes and submits a new certification comitting himself to Part I of these Bid Conditions, so .contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be subject to the require- amts of Part I until such certification is executed and submitted. Rev. 5/76 -19- =s }#' 00079 5. tion-discrimination. In no event may a contractor or subcontractor utilize the goals, timetables or af£iaative action steps required by this Part II in such a manner as to cause or result in discrimination against any person on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. — Part In: Certifications. A. Bidders' Certification. A bidder vill not be eligible for award of a contract ander this Invitation for Bids un- less such bidder bas submitted as a part of its bid the following certifi- cation, which will be deemed a part of the resulting contract: BIMEILS' CEBIIF GMOB certifies that: (Bidder) 1. it intends to a ploy the following listed construction trades in its work under the contract and 2- (a) as to those trades set forth in the-preceding paragraph one hereof for which it is eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Contra Costa Plan, it will caoply with the Contra Costa Plan on this and all future construction work id Contra Casta County Within the stupe of coverage of that Plan, those trades being: and/or • (b) as to those trades for which it is required by these Bid Conditions to caeply with Part 1I of these Bid Conditions, it adopts the aiaima minority manpower utilization goals and the specific affir- native action steps contained in said Part 1I, on this and all future construction work in Contra Costa County subject to these Bid Conditions, those trades being. and ]. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors and submit to the contracting or administering agency prior to the award of any subcontract under this contract the subcontractor certification required by these Bid Conditions. (Signature of authorized representative of bidder) 3. S zeontraetors' Certifications. Prior to the award of any subcontract under this Invitation for Bids, regardless of tier, the prospective sub- contractor Bust execute and submit to the Prize Contractor the following certification,which will be deemed a part of the resulting subcontractz Rev. 5/76 -2a 000°0 SiJ=NTRAMRs' CERTIFICATION certifies that: (Subcontractor) 1. it intends to employ the following listed construction trades in its work under the subcontract 3 (a) as to those trades set forth in the preceding paragraph one hereof for which it is eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Contra Costa Plan, it will comply with the Contra Costa Pian on this and all future coustrsction work in Contra Costa Coany subject to these Bid Conditions, tbcse trades being- . and/or (b) as to these trades for which it is required by these Bid Conditions to ercply with cart II of these Bid Conditiom,it adopts the ..in+,=-,minority manpower utilization goals and the specific affirmative action steps contained in said Part II on this and all future construction work in Coatra Costa County subject to them Bid Conditiam,those trades beiagr and 3. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors prior to the award of any subcontract under this subcontract the subcontractor certification required by these Bid Conditions. (Signature of authorized representative of bidder) In order to ensure that the said subcontractors' certification be- comes a part of all subcontracts under the prime contract, no subcontract - shall be executed until an authorized representative of the Contra Costa County Public Wrks Department has dete-nened, in writing, that the said earritication has been incorporated in such subcontract, regardless of tier. Azo,subcontract executed Without each)mitten approval sball be voided. C. tlateriality and Resoensiveness. The certifications required to be made by the bidder pursuant to these Bid Conditions is material and will cavern —bidder's perfor=oee on the project and will be made a part -f his�•a. failure to submit the certification will reader the bid nonresponsive. Rev. 5/76 -21- .a r� e Part IV: Compliance and Enforcement. Contractors are responsible for informing their subcontractors regard es, of tier) as to their respective. obligations under Parts 1 and It hereof (.•c applicable). The bidder, contractor or subcontractor shall carry out such sani.Jons and penalties for violation of the eouai opportunity clause including suspension. termination and cancellation of existing subcontracts as may be imposed or ordered by the Contra Costa County Public Works Oepartmwnt. Any bidder, or contractor or subcontractor who shall fail to carry out such sanctions and penalties shall be deemed to be in noncom- pliance with these Bid Conditions. Violation of any substantial requirement in the Contra Costa Plan by a contractor or subcontractor covered by Part 1 of these Bid Conditions including the failure of such contractor or subcontractor to oke a good faith effort to meet its fair share of the trade's goals of minority manpower utilization,or of the requirements of Part 11 hereof by a contractor or subcontractor who is covered by Part 11 shall be deemed to be in noncompliance by such contractor or subcontractor with the Equal Opportunity Clause of the contract, and shall be grounds of imposition of the sanctions and penalties provided herein. The Contra Costa County Public Works Department shall review its contractors' and subcontractors' employment practices during the performance of the contract. In regard to Part It of these conditions if the contractor or subcontractor meets its goats or if the contractor or subcontractor can demonstrate that it has made every good faith effort to meet those goals, the contractor or subcontractor shall be presumed to be in compliance with these Bid Conditions and no formal sanctions or proceedings leading toward sanctions shall be instituted unless the agency otherwise determines that the contractor or subcontractor is not providing equal employment opportunities. In Judging whether a contractor or subcontractor has met its goals, the agency will consider each contractor's or subcontractor's minority manpower utilization and will not take into consideration the minority manpower utilization of its subcontractors. Where the agency finds that the contractor or subcontractor has failed to comply with the requirements of these Bid Conditions, the agency shall take such action and impose such sanctions as may be appropriate including, but not limited to: 1. Withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or 2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. and/or ;. To the extent allowed by applicable State Statutes, the contractor may be declared ineligible for further County Public Yorks contracts until he satisfies the County that he has established and is implementing an Equal EmPloyment Opportunity program which conforms to the provisions contained herein. When the agency proceeds with such formal action it has the burden of proving that :he contractor las not net the requirenents of these Bid Conditions, but the contractor's failure to meet his goats shall shift to him the requirement to cane forward with evidence to show that he has met the"good faith" requirements of these Bid Conditions by instituting at least the Specific Affirmative Action steps listed above and by making every good faith effort to make those steps work toward the attainment of its goals within its timetables. The pendency of such foetal proceedings shall be taken into consideration by Contra Costa County Rev. 5/76 -u- =: + O0082 t�tL lj " s In determining whether such contractor c: subcontractor can comply with the requirements contained therein and is therefore a 'responsible prospective contractor." - It shall be no excuse that the union with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement providing the exclusive referral failed to refer minority employees. The procedures set forth in these conditions shall not apply to any contract when the Contra Costa County Public Yorks Department determines that such contract is essential to the national security a. that its award without following such procedures is necessary to the national security. Contractors and subcontractors must keep such records and file such reports relating to the provisions of these Bid Conditions as shall be required by the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. Submittal of CALTRAMS form HC-7. FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION COUTRACTORS EEO REPORT or optional fore 66. MDRTHLY MAIPDYER UTILIZATION REPORT will be required monthly. Additional forms or reports that may be required will be presented at a pre-construction conference to be held prior to the start of work. For the Information of bidders. a copy of the Contra Costa Plan may be obtained from the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. Rev. 5/76 -23- is 00083 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1. Definitions: Whenever the following terms, pronouns in place of them, or initials of organizations appear in the contract documents, they shall have the following meaning: Addendum - A document issued by the County during the bidding pew-which modifies, supersedes, or supplements the original contract documents_ Affirmative Action ha er Utilization Report written ocument y, wee�or monthly) prepared by the contractor for submission to the County which reports the total number of employees, the total number of min- ority employeV. and the present minority manhours of total man- hours worked on the project. int - The Kitten document of agreement, exe- cuted by the Uo-=ty and the Contractor. r�hitect or Engineer - Shall mean the architect, engineer, individual or co-partnership, employed by the County of Contra Costa; as designated on the title sheet of these speci- fications. When Contra Costa County is designated as the Engineer, Engineer shall mean the Public Works Director, or his authorized representative. Bidder - Any individual, partnership. corporation, association, o t venture. or any combination thereof, submitting a proposal for the work, acting directly, or through a duly author- ized representative. Boardof Su ervisors - Shall mean the duly elected or appointed of�ls who constitute such a Board, who will act for the County in all matters pertaining to the Contract. Chan a Order - Is any change in contract time or price and any change is contract documents not covered by subcontractors Cleft Pro ect laplgir, Construction Sig In eetor, or of e o shall mean the authortzeya t o Zraunty at1►t a smite of the work. Contract - The contract is comprised of the contract documents. Contract Documents - The contract documents include the agreement. aot ce to contractors. instructions to bidders; proposal, plans, general conditions, specifications, contract bonds, addenda. change orders. and supplementary agreements. Rev 5/76 -24- 00081 I , 1 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1. Definitions: (continued) Contractor - The individual, partnership, corporation, association, o t venture, or any combination thereof, who has entered into a contract with the County. Carat - Shall mean the County of Contra Costa, a political vision of the State of California and party of the first part, or its duly authorized agent acting within the scope of their authority. Field Order - Is an instruction given during the course of the wcr _ ee Section 16B). General Notes - The written instructions, provisions, conditions, or other requirements appearing on the drawings, and so identified thereon, which pertain to the performance of the work. Plans - The official drawings including plans, ele- vations, sect, detail drawings, diagrams, general notes, in- formation and schedules thereon, or exact reproductions thereof, adopted and approved by the Count showing the location, character, • dimension, and details of the work. SS ecifications - The instructions. provisions, condi- tions and detailed requirements pertaining to the methods and man- ner of performing the work, or to the qualities and quantities of work to be furnished and installed under this contract. Subcontractor - An individual, partnership, corporation. association, o t venture, or any combination thereof, who con- tracts with the Contractor to perform work or labor or render service in or about the work. The term subcontractors shall not include those who supply materials only_ S erintendent - The representative of the Contractor who shall be present , the work site at all times during perform- ance of the work, Such Superintendent stall at all times be fully authorized to receive and act upon instructions for the Architect or his authorized agents and to execute and direct the work on be- half of the Contractor. S lementa Agreement - A written agreement providing for alteration, arae nt, or extension of the contract. Stork - The furnishing and installing of all labor, materials, art Iles, supplies. and equipment as specified, desig- nated, or required by the contract. Rev. 5/76 -25- -' :§_ 00085 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 2. Governing Laws and Regulations: A. The Contractor shall keep informed of and observe, and comply with and cause all of his agents and em- ployees to observe and comply with all prevailing Federal and State laws, local ordinances, and rules and regulations made pursuant to said lava. which in anv waw affect the conduct of the work of this contract. B. All work and materials shall be in full accord- ance with the latest rules and regulations of the Uniform Building Code, the State Fire Marshal, the Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety, the National Electric Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code published by the Western Plumbing Officials Association, and other applicable State laws or regulations. Nothing in these Plans or Specifications is to be construed to permit work not conforming to these Codes. The Contractor shall keep copies of Codes on job at all times during construction period. C. Excerpts from Section 6422 of the Labor Code of the State of California are included below. The Contractor shall comply fully with this section of the Labor Code as applicable. "No contract forpublic works involving an estimated expendtiure in excess of $25,000.00 for the excavation of any trench or trenches five feet or more in depth, shall be awarded unless it contains a clause requiring submission by the Contractor and acceptance by the awarding body or by a registered civil or structural engineer, employed by the awarding body to whom authority to accept has been delegated, in advance of ex- cavation, of a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, brac- ing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the haxard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards established by the Construction Safety Orders, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer. "Nothing in this section shall be deemed to allow the use of a shoring, sloping, or protective system less effective than that required by the Construction Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety. "Nothing in this section shall be construed to impose tort liability on the awarding body or any of its employees. "The terms 'public works' and 'awarding body', as used in this section shall have the same meaning as in Labor Code Sec- tions 1720 and 1722 respectively." Rev. 5/76 -26- 00085 00085 • DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 3. Patents and Royalties: A. The Contractor shall provide and pay for all licenses and royalties necessary for the legal use and operation of any of the equipment or specialties used in the work. Certificates shoving the payment of any such licenses or royalties, and per- mits for the use of any patented or copyrighted devices shall be secured and paid far by the Contractor and delivered to the County on completion of the work, if required. SECTION 4. Contractor's Res onsibilit for Work and Public t t es• A. The Work: Until the formal acceptance of the work by the County, the Contractor shall have the charge and care thereof and shall bear the risk of injury or damage to any part of the work by the action of the elements or from any other cause ex- cept as provided in Section 23. The Contractor, at Contractor's cost, shall rebuild, repair, restore, and make good all such damages to any portion of the work occasioned by any of such causes before its accept- ance. • B. Public Utilities: a. The Contractor shall send proper notices, make all necessary arrangements, and perform all other services required in the care and maintenance of all public utilities. The Con- tractor shall assume all responsibility concerning same for which the County may be liable. b. Enclosing or boxing in. for portection of any public utility equipment, shall be done by the Contractor. Upon comple- tion of the work, the Contractor shall remove all enclosures, fill in all openings in masonry. grouting the same watertight. and leave in a finished condition. c. All connections to public utilities shall be made and maintained in such maintained as not to interfere with the con- tinuing use of same by the County during the entire progress of the work. SECTION S. Bond and Insurance: A. The Contractor to whom the work is awarded shall within five (5) working days after being notified enter into a contract with the ower on the Contra Costa County Standard Fors for the work is accordance with the drawing and Specifications, shall fur- nish and file at the same time labor and material and faithful per- formance bonds as set forth in the advertisement for bids, on a form acceptable to the County. Rev. 5/76 -27- 00087 �j e( fi DIVISION F. GEVEMAL CONDITIONS (cont'd) SECTION 5. Bond and Insurance (cont'd) B. Comvensation Insurance: The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this Contract adequate Workmens' Compensation Insurance' for all his employees employed at the site of the project, and in case any work is sublet, the Contract shall require the sub- contractor similarly to provide Workmen's Compensation Insurance for the latter's employees, unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by the Contractor. In case any class of employee engaged in hazardous work under the Contract at the site of the project is not protected under the Workmens' Compensation statute, or in case there is no applicable Workmens' Compensation statute, the Contractor shall provide, and shall cause each subcontractor to provide, adequate insurance for the protection of his employees not otherwise pro- tected. C. Public Liabilitv and Property Damage Insurance: The Contractor, at no cost to Public Agency, shall obtain and maintain during the term hereof, Comprehensive Liability Insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person, and damage to property, including the loss of use thereof, arising out of each accident or occurrence. Consultant shall furnish evidence of such coverage, naming Public Agency, its officers and employees as additional insureds, and requiring 30 days' written notice of policy lapse or cancellation. The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Liability Insurance which shall include the "hold harmless" agreement as required in the Articles to Agreement. D. Fire Insurance: Omitted. -28- 00085 DIVISION F. CENERAL CCH DITI2NS (continued) SECTION 5. BOND AND INSURANCE (continued) E. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE• Certificates of such Workmen's Compensation, Public Liability, Property Damage Insurance, and Fire Insurance, shall be filed with the County and shall be subject to County approval for adequacy of protection_ All certificates shall indicate that Contra Costa County has been named as an additional insured. These certificates shall contain a pprovision that coverage af- forded under the policies will not be cancelled until at least ten days' prior written notice has been given to Contra Costa County. F. PERFORMANCE BOND: One bond shall be in the amount of One Hundred percent (lOUi) of the Contract, and shall insure the Amer during the life of the Contract and for the term of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the work against faulty or improper mater- lals or workmanship that may be discovered during that time. C. PAYNENi BOND: ® One bond shall be in the amount of fifty percent (50X) of the Contract price. and shall be in accordance with the lava of the State of California to secure the payment of all claims for labor and materials used or consumed in theperformance of this contract and of all amounts under the Unemployment Insurance Act. SECTION 6. SUBCONIRACTINC• A. The Contractor shall be responsible for all work per- formed under this contract, and no subcontractor will be recog- nised as such. All persons engaged in the work will be considered as employees of the Contractor. B. The Contractor shall give his personal attention to the ful- fillment of this contract and shall keep the work under his control. When any subcontractor fails to prosecute a portion of the work in a manner satisfactory to the Architect or Engineer, the Contractor shall remove such subcontractor iataediately upon written request of the Architect or Engineer and he shall not again be employed on the work. C. Although the specification sections of this contract may be arranged according to various trades, or general grouping of work. the contractor is not obligated to sublet the work in such manner. The County will not entertain requests to arbitrate dis- putes among subcontractors or between the Contractor and one or more subcontractors concerning responsibility for performing any part of the work. Rev. 5176 -29 00089 i DIVISION F. GE(iEM CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 6, Subcontracting (continued) D. Subletting or subcontracting any portion of the work as to which no subcontractor was designated in the original bid shall be permitted only in case of public emergency or necessity, and then only after a finding reduced to writing as public rec- ord of the awarding authority setting forth the facts constituting such emergency or necessity_ E. Substitution of Subcontractors; Contractor shall not substitute any person or subcontractor in place of a subcontractor listed in his bid proposal without the written approval of the County. Substitution of subcontractors —,at be in accordance with the provisions of the "Subletting and Subcontracting Fair Practices Act" beginning with Section 4100 of the Government Code. Violations of this Act by the Contractor may subject him to penalties which may include cancellation of contract, assessment of 10 percent of the subcontractor's bid, and disciplinary action by the Contractors State License Board, SECTION 7. TIM OF WORK AND DAMAGES: A. The County will designate the starting day of the con- tract on which the Contractor shall immediately begin and thereafter diligently prosecute the work to completion. The Contractor obli- gates himself to complete the work on or before the date, or within the number of calendar days, set forth in the Proposal (Bid Form) for completion, subject only to such adjustment of time as may be set forth in this article or pursuant to Section 21. B. If the work is not completed within the time required, damage will be sustained by the County. It is and wilt be impract- icable and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual damage which the County vill sustain by reason of such delay; and it is therefore agreed that the Contractor will pay to the County the sum of money stipulated per day in the Specifications for each and evary day's delay in finishing the work beyond the time pres- cribed. If the Contractor fails to pay such liquidated damages the County may deduct the amount thereof from any money due or that may become due the Contractor under the contract. C. The work shall be regarded as completed upon the date the County has accepted the same in writing. D. Written requests for contract time extensions, along with adequate justification, shall be submitted to the County not later than sae month following the delay. E. Any money due, or to become due the Contractor, may be retained to cover said liquidated damages and should such money not be sufficient to cover such damages. the County shall have the right to recover the balance from the Contractor or his sureties. Rev_ 5/76 -30- OOOM .......R.. •, .:..4 irk"-+- - - • DIVISSION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 7. TIKE OF WORK AND DAMAGES: (contineud) F. Should the County, for any cause, authorize a sus- pension of work. the time of such suspension will be added to the time allowed for completion. Suspension of work by order of the County shall not be deemed a waiver of the claim of the County for damages for non-completion of the work after the adjusted time as required above. SECTION 8. PROGRESS SCHEDULE: Prior to beginning work the Contractor shall submit to the County a practicable progress schedule of operations on a chart form approved by the County. The schedule of operations shall show the order in which the Contractor proposes to carry out the work, the dates on which he will start each major sub- division of the work, and the contemplated dates of completion of such subdivision. When required by the County, The contractor shall submit an adjusted progress schedule on the approved fors to reflect changed conditions. (Normally a new schedule will be requested when schedule is ooze than thirty (30) ' days in error.) SECTION 9. TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND FACILITIES: A. All water used on the work will be furnished and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall furnish the necessary temporary piping from the distribution point to the points on the • site where water is necessary to carry on the work and upon com- pletion of the work shall remove all temporary piping. B. The Contractor, at his own cost, shall furnish and in- stall all meters,all electric light and power equipment and wiring, all gas meters, gas equipment and piping that is necessary to per- form his work and shall remove the same upon the completion of the work. The Contractor shall pay for all power, light and gas used in the construction work. C. The Contractor shall furnish, wire for, install and main- tain temporary electric light wherever it is necessary to provide Illumination for the proper performance and/or inspection of the work. The lighting shall provide sufficient illumination and shall he so placed and distributed that these Specifications can be easily read in every place where said work is being performed. This tem- porary lighting equipmentmay be awed about but shall be maintained throughout the work, available for the use of the Engineer, Project Inspector, or any other authorized representative of the County whenever required for inspection. Rev. 5/76 -31- 000 _ r1 DIVISION F. GEP&RAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 9. TEKPORARY UTILITIES AM FACILITIES (Continued) D. The Contractor shall provide and maintain for the duration of the work, temporary toilet facilities for the work- men. These facilities shall be of an approved type conforming to the requirements of the County Health Department, and shall be weathertight structures with raised floors. Structures are to have adequate light and ventilation and door equipped with latch or lock. Contractor shall service such facilities daily. maintaining same in a clean and sanitary condition. Portion of site occupied by toilet facilities shall be graded and cleaned up upon removal of facilities when so ordered and/or upon completion of work. E. The County will Pa directly to the utility companies connection fees, _ 6=�t1on fees, permit fees, acreage fees, and all other fees required by the utility companies and associated with the permanent utility services. If additional fees associ- ated with the temporary services are required they will be paid by the Contractor. The County will not a for water, gas, tele- phone and electricity consumed on the pro ect until after the County makes written request to the utility companies that bil- lings be sent to the County. (Normally the County will make these requests after the project is accepted as complete.) F. See Special Conditions for Variations to the above requirements. SECTION 10. PERMITS: A. The Contractor shall make application for all permits, that are required for the performance of his work by all laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, or orders, of any body lawfully empowered to make or issue the same and having jurisdiction, and shall give all notices necessary in connection therewith. The Contractor is not The to pay any charges associated with per- mits. (It is not the present policy of the County to pay fees to the incorporated cities for pensits.) SECTION 11. CONDUCT OF WORK: A. The Contractor shall observe that the County reserves the right to do other work in connection with the project by Con- tract or otherwise. and he shall at all times conduct his work so as to impose no hardship an the County or others engaged in the work. He shall adjust, correct and coordinate his work with the work of others so that no discrepancies shall result in the whole work. B. The Contractor shall provide an adequate work force, materials of proper quality, and equiRgent to properly carry on the work and to insure completion of each part in accordance with his schedule and with the time agreed. Rev. 5/7b s 000921 I DIVISION F. GENERAL COMITIONS (Continued) SECTION 11. CONDUCT OF WORK: C. The Contractor shall personally superintend the work and shallmaintain a competent superintendent or foreman at all times until the job is accepted by the County. This superintendentshall be empowered to act in all matters pertaining to the work. D. Daily Manpower Reports shall be signed by the Contractor. or his Superintendent, and submitted weekly. E. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall clear all obstructions and prepare the site ready for the construction. He shall verify dimensions and scale of plot plans, and shall check all dimensions, levels, and construction. F. Where work of one trade joins, or is on other work, there shall be no discrepancy or incompleteportions when the total project is complete. In engaging one kind of work with another, marring or damaging same will not be permitted. .Should improper work of any trade be covered by another which results in damage, or defects, the whole work affected shall be made good by the Contractor without expense to the County. G. The Contractor shall anticipate the relations of the various trades to progress of the work and shall see that required anchorage or blocking is furnished and sett proper times. An- chorage and blocking for each trade shall be a part of same, ex- • cept where stated otherwise. H. Proper facilities shall be provided at all times for access of the County representatives to conveniently examine and inspect the work. I. Watchmen, at Contractor's option, shall be maintained during the progress of the work as required, at the expense of the Contractor. J. If any subcontractor or person employed by the Contractor shall appear to the Engineer to be incompetent or to act in a dis- orderly or improper manner, he shall be discharged immediately on the written request of the Engineer/Architect, and such person shall not again be employed on the work. SECTION 12. RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITE CONDITIONS: The following shall constitute exceptions, and the sole exceptions, to the responsibility of the Contractor set forth in Section 4. in the Instructions to Bidders: A. If during the course of the work the Contractor encount- ers active utility installations which are not shown or indicated in the plans or in the specifications, or which are found in a locktion substantially different from that shown, and such utilities are not reasonably apparent from visual examination, then he shall Rev. 5/76 -33- 00093 w. a DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 12. RESPONSIBILITY FOR SITE (continued) promptly notify the County in writing. Where necessary for the work of the contract, the County shall issue a written order to the Contractor Co sake such adjustment, rearrangement, repair, removal, alteration, or special handling of such utility, including repair of the damaged utility. For the purposes of the foregoing, "active" shall mean other than abandoned, and "utility installations" shall include the following: Steam, petroleum products, air, chemical, water, sewer, scorn water, gas, electric, and telephone pipe lines or conduits. The Contractor shall perfomm the work described in such written order and compensation therefor will be sad* in accord- ance with Section 21, relating to changes in the work. Except for the items of cost specified in such Sections, the Contractor shall receive no cCmpenaati:n for any other cost, damage or delay to his due to the presence of such utility. If the Contractor fails to give the notice specified above and thereafter acts with- out instruction from the County, then he shall be liable for any or all dosage to such utilities or other work of the contract which arises from his operations subsequent to discovery thereof, and he shall repair and make good such damage at his own cost. B. If the contract requires excavation or other work to a stated Bait of excavation beneath the surface, and if during the course of the work the County orders a change of depth ur dimen- sinus of such subsurface work due to discovery of unsuitable bearing material or for any other cause, then adjustment to con- tract price for such change will be made in accordance with Sec- tion 21. Except for the items of cost specified therein, the Con- tractor shall receive no compensation for any other cost, damage, or dela to his due to the presence of such unsuitable bearing material or other obstruction. SECTION 13. INSPECTION: A. The Contractor shall at all times pers.it the County and their authorized agents to visit and inspect the work or any part thereof and the shops where work is in preparation. This obli- gation shall include maintaining proper facilities and safe access for such inspection. Where the contract requires work to be tested, it shall not be covered up until inspected and approved by the County. and the Contractor shall be solely responsible for notify- ing the Coun•y where and when such work is in readiness for inspec- tion and testing. Should any such work be covered without such test and approval, it shall be uncovered at the Contractor's ex- pense. B. Whenever the Contractor intends to perform work on Saturday, Sunday, or a legal holiday, he shall give notice to the County -ach intention at least two working days prior to performing such work, or such other period as may be speci- fied, so that the County may make necessary arrangements. Rev. 5/76 -34- 000911 tj DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 13. INSPECTION: (Continued) C. The inspection of the work or materials shall not relieve the Contractor of any of his obligations to fulfill his contract as prescribed. Work and materials not meeting such requirements shall be made good and unsuitable work or materials may be rejected, notwithstanding that such work or materials have been previously inspected or that payment has been made. SECTION 14. REJECTIONS OF MATERLALS: A. The Contractor shall promptly remove from the premises all materials condemned by the County as failing to conform to the Contract, whether incorporated in the work or not, and the Contractor shall promptly replace and reexecute his own work in accordance with the Contract and without expense to the County and shall bear the expense of making good all work of other Contractors destroyed or damaged by such removal. S. If the Contractor does not remove such condemned work and materials within reasonable time, fixed by written notice, the County may remove them and may store the materials at the expense of the Contractor. If the Contractor does not pay the expenses of such removal within ten (10) days thereafter, the County may upon ten (10) days written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale and shall account for the net pro- ceeds thereof after deducting all costs and expenses that should have been borne by the Contractor. SECTION 15. ISrERPREfATION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS: • A. Correlation: The contract documents shall be interpreted as being complementary in requiring a complete work ready for use and occupancy or, if not to be occupied, operation. Any require- ment occurring in any one of the documents is as binding as through occurring in all. B. Conflicts in the Contract Documents: In the event of conflict in the contract documents, the priorities stated in sub- divisions 1, 2, 3, and 4 below shall govern: 1. Addenda shall govern over all other contract doucments, except the County s Standard Form Agreement unless it is specifically indicated that such addenda shall prevail. Subsequent addenda shall govern over prior addenda only to the extent specified. 2. In case of conflict between plans and specifi- cations, the specifications shall govern. 3. Conflict within the Plans: a. Schedules. when identified as such, shall govern over all other portions of the plans. b. Specific Notes. shall govern ever all other notes and all ether portions of the plans. c. Larger scale drawings shall govern over Rev l 5 76 ale drawings. -35- 00095 A f F .. h DIVISICN F. GENERAL COMITIC24S (Const.) SECTICN 1S_ INTERPRETATION CF CONTRACT REOUIRFNE\TS: (:onst.) Conflicts within the Specifications: a. The "General Conditions of the Contract" shall govern aver all sections of the specifications except for specific modifications thereto that may be stated in the Special Conditions. b. Omissions: If the contract documents are not complete as to any minor detail of a required construction system or with regard to the manner of combining or installing of parts, mate-.(als, or equipment, but there exists an accepted trade standard for good and workmanlike construction, such detail shall be deemed to have been impliedly required by the contract docuagnts in accordance with such standard. 'Minor detail" shall include the concept of substantially identical components, where the price of each such component is small even though the a="Sate cost or importance is substantial, and shall include a single component which is incidental, even though its cost or Importance may be substantial. The quality and quantity of the parts or material so supplied shall conform to trade standards and be compatible with the type. composition, strength, size, and profile of the parts or materials otherwise set forth in ® the contract documents. SECTION 16. CIARLrICATIONS AND AMITIML INSTRUCTION: A. Notification by Contractor: Should the Contractor discover any conflicts, omissions, or errors in the contract documents or have any question concerning interpretation or clarification of the contract documents. or if It appears to his that the work to be done or any matters relative there- to are not sufficiently detailed or explained in the contract documents, then. before proceeding with the work affected, he shall immediately notify the County in writing through the Construction Supervisor, and request Interpreta- tion, clarification or furnishing of additional detailed Instructions concerning the work. All such questions shall be resolved and instructions to the Contractor issued within a reasonable time by the County, whose decision shalt be final and conclusive. Should the Contractor proceed with the work affected before receipt of Instructions from the County, he shall remove and replace or adjust any work which is not in accordance therewith and he shall be responsible for any resultant damage, defect or added cost. B. Field Orders: During the course of the work the Architect and/or Engineer may issua Field Orders regarding the work. These Field Orders will supplement the Plans and Specifications in order to clarify the intent of the contract documents by adjustment to meet field co^?ittons or to make the various phases of the work meet and join properly. A Field Order involves no change in contract time or price. Performance, partially or in full, of a Field Order shall constitute a waiver of claim for a change in contract time or price for the work covered by the Field Order, unless a Change Order has been issued. C. Change orders: See Section 21, this Division. Rev-12/72 -36- 00096 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Con't.) SECTION 17. PRODUCT AND REFERENCE STANDARDS: A. Product Designation: When descriptive catalogue designations, including manufacturer's name, product brand name, or model number are referred to in the contract documents, such designations shall be considered as being those found in industry publications of current issue at date of first invitation to bid. B. Reference Standards: When standards of the Federal Government, trade societies, or trade associations are referred to in the contract documents by specific date of issue, these shall be considered a part of this contract. When such references do not bear a date of issue, the current published edition at date of first invitation to bid shall be considered as part of this contract. SECTION 18. MATERIALS, ARTICLES. AND EQUIPMENT: A. Material shall be new and of quality specified. Whin not particularly specified, material shall be the best of its class or kind. The Contractor shall, if required, submit satisfactory evidence as to the kind and quality of material. Price, fitness and quality being equal, preference shall be given to products made in California, in accordance with Section 4380 cc seq., of the Government Code, State of California. B. Mechanical equipment, fixtures and material shall be delivered • in original shipping crates to the Job site and the county shall be notified of the receipt of such equipment, fixtures and material before uncrating. The County will, when desired, inspect such equipment, fixtures or material to determine any damage or deviation from that specified. Item damaged during delivery shall be rejected. C. Wherever the name or brand of a manufacturer's article is specified herein, it is used as a measure of quality and utility or a standard. If the Contractor desires to use any other brand or manufacture of equal quality and utility to that specified, he shall make application to the County in writing for any proposed substitutions. Such application shall be accompanied by evidence satisfactory to the County that the material or process is equal to Rev. 12!72 —37- 09097 i • DIVIGIc�F. CE:'_'AL C1'01TIOM (Can't.) ;=t% 18. `ATEIMIS_ ARTICLM AND EQUIPHOIT: (Can't.) that specified. Request for substitution shall be made In ample time for th County's consideration as no delay or extra time will be allowed an account thereof. Evidence furnished to the County by the Contractor shall consist of adequate size samples of material, testing laboratory reports on material or process, eanu`acturer" specification data. field reports on product's approval aM use by other public agencies, material costs, and Installation costs and ,aintenance provisions and experience or other data as requtre.l by the County. The County's decision concerning the refusal or acceptance of proposed substitute for that specified shall be accepted as final. Request, 'or suhstitution will only be considered when offered b. the Contractor with the reason for substitution. "allure to submit competent evidence as required and requested by County shall be considered ;rounds for refusal of substitutionThe Contractor shall include n notice of chane in contract prices. If substitution is approved. D. All materials shall 6e delivered so as to insure a speedy and uninterrupted vrogress of tie work. Daae she be stored so as to cause no obstruction, and so as to prevent overloading of any portion of the structure, and the Contractor shall be entirely responsible for damage or loss by weather or otber cause. E. within fifteen (15) days after the signing of the Contract. the Contractor shall submit for approval to the County a complete list of all materials it is proposed to use under this Contract, which differ in any respect frog vaterials specified. This list shall Include all materials which are rroposee by the subcontractors as well as by himself for use in work of his Contract and which are not specifically mentioned in the Specifications. This list must also Include the figures received by the Contractor In bid fors for the material or materials which are submitted for approval or substitution, together with the figures in bid form of the specified material or materials for which substitutions are proposed. In case a substitute is offmrid and accepted as approved equal to materials specified, the cost of which is less than the cost of the material or equipment specified, then a credit shall be taken for the difference between the two costs In order that the County shall obtain whatever benefits may be derived from the substitution. Failure to propose the substitution of any article within thirty-five (35) days after the signinc of the Contract may be deemed sufficient cause for the denial of request for substitution. CIIoA 19. SHOP DRAWIMS. DESCRIPTIVE DATA_ SA14PLES. ALTEYMTIVES: A. The Contractor shall submit promptly to the County, so as to cause no delay in the work, all shop drawings, descriptive data and samples for the various trades as required by the specifications, and offers of alter- natives, If any. Such submittals shall be checked and coordinated by the Contractor with the work of other trades involved before they are submitted to the County for examination. Rev. 12%72 -3�- 0009 DIVISIONf. RymAL co natON5 (coni.) SECTION 19. SNOF DBAuihl6S, DESC3tIFT1VZ DATA, SAIW=. AISEMATIVES: (Coa't.) 9. The Contractor shall submit to the County shop or diagram drawings in the number of copies as required in subatttal schedule. or five (5) copies if na schedule is included in these documents. The drawings shall show coopletety the work to be done; any error or ouission *ball be made good by the Contractor at his own expense, even though the work be Installed before same becomes apparent, as approval by the County cover* general layout only. Fabrication, details and inspection shall conform to approved Contract Drawings. C. Descriptive Data: Submit seta of esanfacturer"s brochures or other data required by the specifications in the mumbet of copies as required in submittal schedule, or five (5) copies if no schedule !a included in these documents. The County will examine such submittals, noting tberecn corrections, and return three copies with a letter of transmittal indicating actions taken by the County or required of the Contractor. D. Samples: Submit 4429104 of articles, materials or equipment as required by the specifications. The work shall be in accordance with the approval of the samples. Saspite shatt be removed from County property when dlrecred. Staples twat removed by the Contractor, at the County's option„ will become the property of the County or will be removed or disposed of by the county at Contractor-* expense. E. Alternatives: For couvaatence in designation on the plans or in the specifications. certain materials, articles, or equipment may be designated by a brand or trade now or the name of the manufacturer together with catalog designation or other identifying information, hereinafter referred to generically as "designated by brand nems". An alternstive material, article. or equipment which is of equal quality and of the required characteristics for the purpose intended maY be proposed for use provided the Contractor complies with rhe following requirements: 1. The Contractor shall submit his proposal for an alternative In writing within the time limit designated in the specifications, or if not designated, then within a period which will cause no delay in the work. 2. So such proposal will be considered unless accompanied by complete information, and descriptive data, necessary to determine the *quality of the offered materials. articles. or equipment. Samples shalt be provided when requested by the county. The Contractor shall note that the burden of proof as to the comparative quality or suitability of the offered material&, articles, or equip- ment *ball be upon the Contractor. The County shall be the sole Judge as to such matters. In the event that the County rejects the use of such alternative materials, articles, or equipment, then one of the particular products designated by brand name shall be furnished. Itev. 1.2 i 7 2 —3)— fl0099 1' x : 0U099 to • Y DIVISION 6E12E:.AL C"NArIOS (Cm•t.) 3ECTILN 19. 3:hr DRAWM's D:SCiIPrlt_ OAIA iA4PL:3 ALMMTIM: (Const.) the .ounry will examine, with reasonable promptness, such submittals. and return of submittals to the Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from responsibility for deviations and alternatives from the contract plans and specifications, nor shall It relieve him from responsibility for errors In the submittals. A failure by the Contractor to identify In hf• letter of transrfttal material deviations fro+ the plans and Specifications shall void the submittal and any action taken thereon by the County. When specifically requested by the County, the Contractor shall resubmit such shop drawings, descriptive data, and samples as may be required. If any mechanical, electrical, structural, or other changes are required for the proper installation and fit of alternative materials, articles, or equipment, or because ofdeviatlons from the contract plans and specifications, such changes shall not be made without the consent of the County and shall be made without additional cost to the County. SECTICN :O. SAMPLES .ate TESTS: The County reserves the right at its own expense to order testa of any part of the work. If as a result of any such test the work is found unacceptable. It will be rejected and any additional test required by the County shall be at Contractor's expense. Unless otherwise directed, all samples for testing will be taken by the County from rhe materials, articles or equipment delivered, or from work performed, and tests will be under the super- vision of, or directed by, and at such places as may be convenient to the County. arterials, articles, and equipment requiring tests shall be delivered in ample time before intended use to allow for testing, and none may be used before receipt of written approval by the County. Any sample delivered to the County or to the premises for examination, including testing, shall be disposed of by the Contractor at his own expense within not more than ten (10) days after the Contractor acquires a knowledge that such examination is concluded, unless otherwise directed by the County. SECTION 2L CHANGE ORDEP.S• The County reserves the right to order in writing changes in the plans and specifications, without voiding the contract, and the Contractor shall comply with such order. No change or deviation from the plans and specifications will be made without authority in writing from the County. Changed work shall be performed in accordance with the original requirements of the Contract Documents and previous fully executed Change Orders. A Change Order may adjust the contract price either upward or down- ward in accordance with either or a combination of the following bases, as the County may elect; (1) On a lump sun basis as supported by breakdown of estimated costs. Rev. 17!72 —40- 00100 • DIVISIONF- GENERAL 04MMONS (Con't.) SECTION 21. CHANGE ORDERS: (Con't.) (2) On a unit price basis. (3) on a cost-plus basis in accordance with the following conditions: (a) MARK-UPS: 1. For work performed by the General Contractor an amount equal to the direct cost (as defined herein) of the work plus 15%of the direct costa for overhead and profit. 2. For work performed by a sub-contractor an amount equal to the direct costs (as defined herein) of the work plus 20Z of the direct costs for overhead and profit, (Suggested breakdown: 15Z to the sub-contractor, 5% to General Contractor.) 3. For work performed by a sub-sub-contractor an amount equal to the direct costs (as defined herein) of the work plus 251. of the direct costs for overhead and profit. (Suggested breakdown: 152 to sub-sub-contractor, 5% to sub-contractor, 5% to General Contractor.) 4. In no case will the total mark-up be greater than 25Z of the direct costs notwithstanding the number of contract tiers actually existing. 5. For deleted work the mark-up shall be 10Z of the direct . costs or the agreed upon estimate thereof. (b) DIRECT COSTS: 1. Labor: The costs for labor shall include any employer payments to or on behalf of the workmen for health and welfare, pension, vacation and similar purposes. Labor rates will not be recognized when in excess of those prevailing in the locality and time the work is being performed. 2. Materials: The actual cost to the Contractor for the materials directly required for the performance of the changed work. Such cost of materials may include the cost of procurement, transportation and delivery if necessarily incurred. If a trade discount by the actual supplier is available to the Contractor, it shall be credited to the County. If the materials are obtained from a supply or source owned wholly or in part by the Contractor, payment therefore will not exceed the current wholesale price for such materials. The term "trade discount" includes the concept of cash discount. Rev.12/72 Rev. —41- 00101 4': 00101 Mon— f, DIVISION F. GE\'F.RAL CO,%'D1TIO';S (Con't.) SECTION 21. CHANGE ORDERS: (Con't.) 2. Materials: (Con't.) If, in the opinion of the County, the cost of materials is excessive, or if the Contractor fails to furnish satisfactory evidence of the cost to him from the actual supplier thereof, then in either case the cost of the materials shall be deemed to be the lowest current wholesale price at which similar materials are available in the quantities required. The County reserves the right to furnish such materials as it deems advisable, and the Contractor shall have no claims for costs or profits on material furnished by the County. 3. Equipment: The actual cost to the Contractor for the use of equipment directly required in the performance of the changed work. In computing the hourly rental of equipment, any time less than 30 minutes shall be considered one-half hour. No payment will be made for time whiie equipment is inoperative due to breakdowns or for non-working days. In addition, the rental time shall include the time required to move the equipment to the work from the nearest available source for rental of such equipment, and to return it to the source. If such equipment is not moved by its own power, then loading and transportation costs will be paid in lieu of rental time therefor. However, neither moving time nor loading and transportation costs will be paid if the equipment is used on the project in any other way than upon the changed work. Individual pieces _f equipment having a replacement value of 51,000 or less shall be considered to be tools or small equfpaent. and_o payment will be made therefor. For equipment owed, furnished, or rented by the Contractor, no cost therefor shall be recognized in excess of the rental rates established by distributors or equipment rental agencies in the locality where the work is performed. The amount to be paid to the Contractor for the use of equipment as set forth above shall constitute full compensation to the Contractor for the cost of fuel, power, oil, lubrication, supplies, small tools, small equipment, necessary attachments, repairs and maintenance of any kind, depreciation, storage, insurance, labor (except for equipment operators), and any and all costs to the Contractor incidental to the use of such equipment. (c) ALLMABLE TIME EXTENSIONS: For any change In the work, the r_ontractor shall be entitled only to such adjustments in time by which completion of the entire work is delayed due to performance of the changed work. ..ach estimate for a change in the work submitted by the Contractor shall state the amount of extra time that he considers should be allowed for making the requested change. Rev. 12/72 -42- �`' ' ' 00102 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Con't.) SECTION 21. CHANCE ORDERS: (Con't.) . (d) RECORDS AND SUPPORTIVE INFORMATION: (1) The Contractor shall maintain his records in such a manner as to provide a clear distinction between the direct costs of extra work paid for on a cost-plus basis and the costs of other operations. (2) Contractor shall maintain daily records shoving man hours and material quantities required for cost plus work. The Contractor shall use a form approved or provided by the County. The forms will be filled out in duplicate and the County's inspector will review and attach his approving signature to the form on the day the work is performed. (3) Rental and material charges shall be substantiated by valid copies of vendor's invoices. (4) The contractor's cost records pertaining to cost-plus work shall be open to inspection or audit by the County. (e) FAILURE TO AGREE AS TO COST: Notwithstanding the failure of the County and the Contractor to agree as to cost of the proposed change order, the Contractor, upon written order from the County, shall proceed immediately with the changed work. Daily job records shall be kept as indicated in Paragraph (d) above and when agreed to by the Contractor and the construction inspector, it shall become the basis for payment of the changed work. Agreement and execution of the daily job record by the construction inspector shall not preclude subsequent adjustment based upon a later audit by the County. Rev. 12/72 —43—_ Ort F00103 DIVLSIO.X F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Com't.) SECTION 22. LABOR: Every part of the work shall be accomplished by workmen, laborers, or mechanics especially skilled in the class of work required and workmanship shall be the best. SECTICN 23, OCC'-•?A%CY BY THE COVNry PRICK TO ACCEPTANCE: The County reserves the right to occupy all or any part of the project prior to coapletion of the work, upon written order therefor. In such event, the Contractor will be relieved of responsibility for any Injury or damage to such part as results from such occupancy and use by the County. Such occupancy does not constitute acceptance by the County of the work or any portion thereof. nor will it relieve the Contractor of responsibility for correcting defective work or materials found at any time before the acceptance of the work as set forth in Section 21-or during the guaranty period after such acceptance, as set forth in Section'_E. SECTION 26 PRESERVATION AND CLEANING: A. The Contractor shall protect and preserve the work from all damage or accident, providing any temporary roofs. window and door coverings. boxings or other construction as required by the County. This shall include any adjoining property of the County and others. B. The Contractor shall properly clean the work as it progresses. As directed during construction, rubbish shall be removed, and at completion the whole work shall be cleaned and all temporary construction, equipment and rubbish shall be removed from the site, all being left in a clean and proper condition satisfactory to the County. SECTION 25, PAYMENT OF FEDERAL OR STATE TAXES: Any Federal. State or local tax payable on articles furnished by the Contractor, under the Contract, shall be included In the Contract price and paid by the Contractor. The County will furnish Excise Tax Exemption Certificates to the Contractor for any articles which are required to be furnished under the Rev. 12/72 —j4_ '; 00104 f DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Can't.) SECTION 25. PAYMENT OF FEDERAL OR STATE TAXES: (Can't) Contract and which are exempt from Federal Excise Tax. SEC.'ION 26. ACCEPTANCE: A. The work shall be accepted in writing only when it s shall have been completed satisfactorily to the County. Partial payments shall not be construed as acceptance of any part of the work. B. In judging the work no allowance for deviations from the drawings and Specifications will be made, unless already approved in writing at the time and in the manner as called for heretofore. C. County shall be given adequate opportunity to make any necessary arrangements for fire insurance and extended coverage. D. Final acceptance of the Contract will not be given until all requirements of the contract documents are complete and approved by the County. This shall include, but is noc limited to, all construction. guarantee forms, parts list, schedules, tests, operating instructions, and as-built drawings - all as required by the contract documents. SECTION 27. FINAL PAYMENT AND WAVnM TO CLAIMS: After the official acceptance of the work by the County. the Contractor shall submit to the County, on a form acceptable to the County, a request for payment in full in accordance with the contract. The form"Statement to Accompany Final Payment" (Page 41 ) shall be completed. signed by the Contractor, and submitted to the County with the final payment request. SECTION 28. GUARANTEE: A. The Contractor hereby unconditionally guarantees that the work will be done in accordance with requirements of all con- tract, and further guarantees the work of the contract to be and remain free of defects in workmanship and materials for a period of one year from the date of acceptance of the contract, unless a longer guarantee period is specifically called for. The Contractor hereby agrees to repair or replace any and all work, together with any other adjacent work which may be displaced in so doing. that may prove to be not in its workmanship or material within the guar- antee period specified, without any expense whatsoever to the County, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted. B. Contract bonds are in full force and effect during the guarantee period. C. The Contractor further agrees, that within 10 calen- dar days after being notified in writing by the County of any work not in accordance with the requirements of the contract or any Rev. 5/76 -45- 00105 DWISION FCONDITIONS (Con't) SECTION 28. GUARANTEE (con't.) defects in the work. he will c+�n:e and prosecute with due diligence all work necessary to fulfill the teras of this guarantee. and to complete the work within a reasonable period of tine, and in the event he fails to so comply, he does hereby authorise the County to proceed to have such work done at the Contractor's expense and he will pay the cost thereof upon de- mand. The County shall be entitled to all costs, including reasonable attorneys fees. necessarily incurred upon the con- tractor's refusal to pay the above costs. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, in the event of an emergency constituting an mediate hazard to the health or safety of the County's employees, property, or licen- sees, the County my undertake at the Contractor's expense with- out prior notice all work necessary to correct such hazardous conditions when it was caused by work of the Contractor not being in accordance with the requirements of this contract. D. The general contractor and each of the listed sub- contractors shall execute and furnish the County with the standard f2arantee form. as Page 44 ), Rev. Sll6 -46- r __ 00106 �XAN1l-LE'i GUARANTM FON con"ODSTA C MY BUILDING MART U, CALITORNIA We hereby guarantee to the County of Contra Costa the (Type of York) which we have installed in the (Nene of Building) . California, fcr year (s) use from date Of filing of the completion notice in the Office of the County Recorder. We agree to repair or replace to the satisfaction of the Cotmty any or all such work that may prove defective in workmanship or materials within that period, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted, together with any other work which nay be damaged or displaced in so doing. If we fail to comply with the above mentioned conditions within a reasonable time after being notified in writing, we, collectively and separately, do hereby authorize the owner to proceed to have the defects repaired and mode good at our expense and we will pay the costs and charges therefore immediately upon demand. This guarantee covers and includes any special term, including time periods, specified for this work or materials in the plans and specifications for this project. This guarantee supersedes any previous guarantees we have mode for this particular project. SUBCONTRACTOR Date: (Affix Corporate Seal) GENERAL CONTRACTOR Date: (Affix Corporate Seal) NOTE: If the firm is not a corporation, add a paragraph stating the type of business organization and the capacity and authority of the person signing the guarantee. Rev. 12/72 -47- 0010"1 f, sk FORM STATEMENT TO ACOOMPANY FINAL PAYMENT To: Contra Costa County Public Works Department County Administration Building Martinez, California Re: Final Payment (Project) Dear Sir: She undersigned Contractor represents and agrees that the final payment includes herein all claim and demands, of whatever nature, which he has or may have against the County of Contra Costa in connection with the contract to construct the above-entitled project, and that payment by the County of the final estimate shall discharge and release it from any and all claims. She undersigned hereby certifies that all work, labor, and materials' on this project have been furnished and purchased in full compliance with the contract and with all applicable laws and regulations. The undersigned states that his claim for final psymeat is true and correct, that no part has been theretofore paid, and that the amount therein is justly due. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at (City) California. Rev. 12172 -48- 00108 i TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FIRE COLLEGE SITE IMPROVEM&NITS - PIUSE V { 1. CLEARING AND GRUBBING AM) EARTIR%'ORK All areas receiving improvements of whatever nature, such as, but not limited to street work, utilities, grading, whether in cut or in fill, shall be defined as "Areas of designated project earthwork". All grading shall be accomplished to the lines and grades shown on the Grading Plan and the Improvement Plans, and to a tolerance of plus or minus one tenth of a foot for all areas. All excess excavated materials shall be removed and disposed of away from the Lands of the Owner or shall be blade spread on the site on areas to be designated and as directed by the county. All borrow material shall be obtained from the site. Topsoil shall be first stripped and later replaced over such borrow areas. The Contractor shall notify the county as soon as it becomes apparent that an unbalance will occur in earthwork quantities. The county will then designate such areas as are required for borrow or for depositing excess material or if the county deems it desirable, will adjust the lot grades to avoid such unbalance. The Contractor shall adjust to finished grade after spreading of topsoil all manholes, valve boxes, or other structures that are within the limits of work. O0109 y, 2. WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES SCOPE OF 1tiOPR Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of crater systems and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working _ installation. STANDARD DETAILS A\D SPECIFICATIONS All components and workmanship involved in the construction of the water system must conform to the requirements of the Standards and Specifications of the County of Contra Costa and the Contra Costa Water Department. 00119 3. STORM SP-%1ER AND APPURTENANCES SCOPE OF WORK ' Work under this section shall include furnishing all Tabor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of storm water systems and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. MTERIALS CAST IRON PIPE Cast iron pipe shall conform to the requirements of Section 71 of the California Standard Specifications, January 1975. FR*1ES AATD GRATES AND COTTERS Structural Steel: Shall be fabricated of structural grade mild steel, and hot dipped galvanized in accordance with ASTM Designation A-123. Cast Iron: Shall conform to Sections 55 and 70 of the California Standard Specifications, January 1975. 00111 r 3. STORM SFV.EP.j kND All PO V: iNCES (CONT.) . CATCH BASH Catch basins shall be Christy V-32 or approved equal. The catch basins shall have a concrete base with a minimum thickness of 6". TRENCHING The County shall have tiie right to limit the amount of trench which shall be opened or partly opened at any time. The trench shall be excavated to the lines, grades, and dimensions shoo n on the plans and as specified herein: Excavated materials suitable for backfill shall be so placed so as not to restrict access or cause undue inconvenience to other Contractors, pedestrians or street traffic, and adjacent land owners. Suitable excess soils shall be blade spread in an area to � be determined by the county. Undesirable materials shall be removed and disposed of off the lands of the owner at the Contractor's expense. County shall determine what material is undesirable. The Contractor shall at his own expense, furnish, put in place, and maintain such sheetings, braces, etc., as may be required to support the sides of all excavations (whether above or below the pipe grade), and to prevent any movement which could'in any way diminish the required trench section, or otherwise injure or delay the work. The sheeting, braces, etc. shall be withdrawn so as to prevent any earth movement that might overload the pipe. All of the above-mentioned operations shall conform to the rules, orders, and regulations of the California Industrial Accident Commission. When the bedding material encountered is rock, the trench shall be excavated an additional distance of at least four (4) inches below grade for the bottom of the pipe, and the bottom of the trench shall be refilled with approved material moistened and compacted by tamping or other approved methods to the satisfaction of the county. When the bedding material encountered is mud, quicksand, or other unstable material, the bed shall be made firm and solid by removing said unstable material to a sufficient depth and replacing same with crushed rock, gravel or other approved material, well compacted into place in an approved manner and to the satisfaction of the county. When the trench has been inadvertently excavated by the Contractor to below the required grade, the bottom of the trench shall be 00112 '1 3. STORM SIEVERS AND -1 PPURTE%A%CH S (CONT.) refilled with approved material , moistened and compacted by tamping or by other approved method to the satisfaction-of the county. PIPE LAYING The Contractor shall remove water from the trenches by pumping or other methods during the laying, bedding, and backfill operations. The pipe shall be supported on firm, stable material free of lumps and rocks, for the full length of each pipe section. Where water is encountered in the trench, free draining gravel shall be used as required to drain the water and provide stable bedding. Bell holes shall be accurately placed and shall not be larger than reasonably required to make the joint. Before the pipe is laid, the interior of the joint of the preceding pipe shall be carefully cleaned. After each section of pipe has been laid to line and grade and joined to the preceding section, and after jointing procedure has commenced, there shall be no movement of the pipe in subsequent operations. Select material shall be placed and compacted uniformly on either side of the pipe to prevent movement. Particular care shall be taken to place well compacted material under the haunches of the pipe. Pipe joints shall be made to the manufacturer's recommendation and in accordance with the State of California Standard Speci- fications. The ends shall abut squarely and closely against each other in such a manner that there shall be no shoulder or unevenness along the interior of the pipe. Pipe placing shall occur on material sufficiently dry to permit approved jointing and the Contractor shall maintain the water level low enough to permit this when water is encountered. CD Before leaving the work at any time, the pipe shall be securely closed at its open end and after work is completed, the pipe shall be carefully and thoroughly cleared of all refuse, earth or any objectionable material to the county's approval. BACKFILL No length of pipe shall be laid until the previous length has had sufficient material uniformly compacted under the haunches on either side of it to prevent further movement. After the pipe has been properly laid and inspected, select backfill material shall be placed around and over the pipe to a depth of six (6") inches and thoroughly compacted by hand tamp- ing to a density of (951) ninety-five percent of maximum in accordance with test method No. Calif. 216. All remaining back- fill material shall have a sand equivalent value of not less than O0113 II � I /rn•*m 1 y Kj 2 3. STORM SEWERS AND APPURTEN.-INCES (CONT.) replacing the entire portion between joints or scores, and not by refinishing the damaged part. Concrete for the purpose outlined• in this paragraph shall be six (6) sacks per cubic yard. All work shall match the appearance of the existing improvements as nearly as practicable. Lampblack or other pigments may be added to the concrete to obtain the necessary results. 00114 4. * SUB-GRADE PR-PPARATIO% SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construc- tion of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of sub-grade under pave- ment, curbs, gutters, walks, etc:, and other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified. The work shall include all materials, equipment, and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. METHOD . All the work under this section shall conform to the applicable provisions of the various Sections of the Standard Specifications referring to sub-grade preparation for the type of base material to be utilized. LIME TREATMENT Lime treatment shall conform to Section 24 of the Standard Specifications. Special attention is directed to Section 24-1.04 Mixing. The distance which lime may be spread upon the prepared material ahead of the mixing operation will be determined by the county. 00115 ---T rj 5. SUBBASE . Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required - for the complete installation and construction of the subbase and all other appurtenances shown on the plans-and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. _ MATERIALS Materials for aggregate subbase shall conform to Class 2 Aggregate Subbase as described in Section 25 of the State of California Standard Specifications. It shall have a minimum "R" value of 56 and a minimum sand equivalent value of 30. CONSTRUCTION Class 2 Subbase shall be placed spread and compacted in conformance with Section 25-1.04 and Section 25-1.05 of the State of California Standard Specifications. 00116 �9 6. RkSE Work under this section shall include furnishing all Iabor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construc tion of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of the base and all other appurtenances shorn on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, .but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. MikTERIALS Materials for aggregate base shall conform to Class 2 Aggregate Base as described in Section 26 of the State of California Standard Specifications. It shall have a minimum "R" value -of 76 and a minimum sand equivalent value of 30. CONSTRUCTION Class 2 Base shall be placed, spread and compacted in conformance with Section 26-1.04 and Section 26-1.05 of the State of California Standard Specifications. The completed base shall not vary more than 0.05 foot from theoretical grade at any point. 00117 ..j .. 'b ♦ r .%'.9.,+4 r �J. `: 7. ASPIULT CONCRETE SCOPE. OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, mate- rials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of asphalt concrete pavement and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all material, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. Asphalt Concrete shall be Type B and shall conform to the applicable provisions of Section 39 of the Standard Specifications. TI ATER ULS Aggregate shall be Type B and shall conform to the applicable pro- visions of Section 39 of the Standard Specifications. The grading of the combined aggregates shall conform to the z inch maximum size, "medium" grading as listed in said Section 39. Paving asphalt to be mixed with the aggregate, shall be a steam- refined asphalt, penetration grade 85-100 in conformance with Section 92 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Liquid asphalt used for prime coat unless otherwise directed by the county shall be grade MC-70 in conformance with Section 93 of the State of California Standard Specifications. - Asphaltic emulsion fortack coat (paint binder) and fog seal coat shall be "nixing Type Emulsion" manufactured from liquid paving asphalt penetration grade 120-150 conforming to Section 94 of the State of California Standard Specifications. All joints or cut edges to be coated before paving. CONSTRUCTION Asphalt concrete shall be proportioned, mixed, and placed in con- formance with the applicable provisions in Section 39 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Before placing asphalt concrete on an untreated base, a liquid asphalt prime coat shall be applied to the base course in the areas to be surfaced in accordance with the provisions in Section 39 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Prime coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.25 gallons per square yard. Asphalt (for 3" finished thickness) shall be laid in two passes of 12" compacted thickness each pass. 00]18 I a i1 7. ASHRLT CONCRETE (CONT.) I - CONSTRUCTION Before placing asphalt concrete, and asphalt emulsion tack coat . (Paint Binder shall be applied to all vertical surfaces of existing pavement, curbs, gutters, and construction joints and to existing pavement to be surfaced; all in accordance with the pro- visions of Section 39 of the State of California Standard Speci- fications. Tack coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.10 gallons per square yard. A fog seal coat shall be applied to all finished surfaces of asphalt concrete pavement in accordance with the provisions of Section 37 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Fog seal coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.05 gallons per square yard. ADJUSTMENT OF STRUCTLRE All manhole rims, valve boxes, or other structures shall be adjusted to the design grade after placement of the base but prior to application of the prime coat or paving. A Class A concrete collar shall be poured around each ring, casting, or box. The top of the concrete collar shall be maintained at finished base grade, and the asphalt concrete will extend over the collar. 00119 u �q w 3 8. STRIPING I Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, � materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities .required for the complete installation of the painted stripes shown on the plans and/or specified herein. f j The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working' installation. MATERIALS Materials for striping shall conform to the provisions of Section 91 of the State of California Standard Specifications. CONSTRUCTION All painting shall conform to the provisions of Section 59 of the State of California Standard Specifications. t 00120 M d 9. PORTLAND CE ME':T CONCRETE SCOPE OF I10RiC Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, mate- rials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of Portland Cement Concrete facilities, structures, and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. ' The work shall include all materials, equipment, and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. INLATERIALS CONCRETE Concrete shall be Class A with no less than six (b) sacks sof cement per cubic yard, and shall have a twenty-eight (28) day compressive strength of at least 3,000 PSI. CEMENT Cement shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation C150 Type II. AGGREGATES Aggregates shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation C33 and shall be 3/4 inch maximum size. WATER Water shall be clear and free from injurious amounts of oil, acid, alkali, organic matter, or other deleterious substances. REINFORCED BARS Reinforcing bars shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation A15, intermediate grade, and deformed in accordance with ASTM Designation A305. PRDIOLDED EXPANSION' JOINT FILLER Premolded expansion joint filler shall conform to the requirements of ASTA1 Designation D994 and shall be 4 inch thick, the full depth of the concrete section. They shall be placed at a maximum spacing of twenty-five feet (25'). 00121 ! P F w tk mm79. PORTLAND Cj MrNT CONCRETE (CON!.) FORA LUMBER - I Form lumber shall be Douglas Fir plywood, "plyform" 5/8 inch minimum thickness, or Douglas Fir lumber one inch nominal thickness, S43. ADMIXTURES None shall be used. FORMS Forms shall be smooth, mortar-tight, true to the required lines and grades, and of sufficient strength to resist springing out of shape during the placing of concrete. All dirt, chips, sawdust and other foreign matter shall be removed from forms before any concrete is deposited therein. Forms previously used shall be thoroughly cleaned of all dirt, mortar, and foreign matter before being reused. Before concrete is placed in forms, all inside surfaces of the forms shall be thoroughly coated with a form of oil approved by the county. All exposed sharp edges shall be chamfered with triangular fillets not less than 3/4 inch by 3/4 inch to prevent mortar runs and to preserve smooth straight lines unless otherwise directed by the county. Fillets shall be surfaced on all sides. Surfaces shall be formed of strips of matched lumber not over 4 inches wide, or plywood, or steel, as approved by the county. Forms shall not be removed until the concrete has attained suffi- cigrit strength to prevent any damage thereto. As a minimum requirement, forms shall be left in place for three (3) days or as directed by the county. i REINFORCED STEEL Bars shall be fabricated to the shapes and dimensions as shown on the plans, accurately placed, securely tied at all intersections and splices with 18 gauge black annealed wire, and adequately held in position by spacers, chairs or other approved supports. Splices shall be lapped at least 32 diameters. Before placing concrete all reinforcing bars shall be thoroughly cleaned of loose mill scale, rust, mortar, oil, dirt, and coatings of any character that would destroy or reduce bond. MIXING AND PLACING CONCRETE Ready-mixed concrete shall be batched at a central batching plant and transit-mixed in truck mixers, in accordance with the require- ments of ASTM Designation C94. Batching weights of all aggregates 00122 9. POP.TUIND CEME:T CONCRETE (CONT.) per cubic yard shall be furnished by the Contractor to the county. The total elapsed time between introduction of mixing water to ti:e batch and placing the concrete shall not exceed 60 minutes. Job-mixed concrete shall be mixed in a power-operated -rotary batch mixer, with hoppers and controls permitting accurate measurement by weight of all materials. Equipment and procedures shall be subject to the approval of the county. The concrete shall be of a consistency suitable for satisfactory placing with a reasonable amount of vibration and spading. Slump for concrete 4 inches. In all cases, the water-cement ratio shall be maintained to produce concrete of the strength specified. The batch plant shall submit a cylinder to the county for 3000 P.S.I. concrete with 3/4" rock and maximum of 4" slump. The concrete shall be depoisted as nearly as practicable in the final position, to avoid rehandling and flowing. It shall be deposited in uniform horizontal layers, avoiding inclined planes, and each layer shall be placed before initial set of previous layer. Concrete shall be compacted as it is placed to obtain maximum vibrators submerged in the concrete, supplemented by hand spading, rodding, and tamping as required. External vibration of forms will not be permitted. Construction joints shall be avoided as much as possible due to stoppage of work, except where indicated on the plans. Before placing new concrete, the surface of the concrete in place shall be thoroughly roughened, cleaned of laitance, foreign matter, and loose particles, and given a coat of cement grout, consisting of one (1) part cement to 2-2 parts sand, for proper bond. CURING All concrete work shall be cured by applying to the surface immed- iately after it has been finished, a uniform coating of practically colorless impervious membrane, in accordance with the Standard Specifications. The Coating shall be sprayed on the concrete by means of a pressure sprayer in a continuous film of uniform color and thickness. Sufficient pressure shall be maintained to atomize the liquid into a fine spray or mist. The liquid shall be applied in such quantities as will seal the exposed surface thoroughly. The concrete shall be barricaded from traffic and damage during the curing period of seventy-two (72) hours. Broken or damaged seal shall be immediately repaired with additional curing compound. INSPECTION AND TESTS All work shall be subject to the inspection of the county. The Contractor shall notify the county at least one working day prior to each concrete pour, to permit inspection of forms and rein- forcement, and to witness concrete placing if desired. No 00123 r 9. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (CONI.} . concrete shall be placed until the county has approved .the forms and reinforcement. When so requested by the county, the Contractor shall furnish mill test reports on the cement, reinforcing bats and aggregates, showing compliance with the respective ASTM specifications. The county will make concrete tests cylinders and slump tests as deemed necessary to determine compliance with specifications. i 4 X194 i 10. INIEVIL BIULDING SCOPE OF NORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of the Metal Building and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein including but not limited to: ca r a. Pre-manufactured metal building ? b. Doors and hardware i c. Fence walls, including battens I d. Concrete floor MATERIALS The Metal Building shall be in strict compliance to the "Recommended Guide Specification for Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings" as published by the Metal Building Manufacturers Association, 2130 Reith Building, Cleveland, Ohio. STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS Contractor shall submit manufacturers detailed design information of all manufactured items, doors, hardware, etc. Shop and Erection Drawings shall be provided to the owner to obtain a building permit. Appropriate calculation and sketches shall also be provided as required and all drawings must be stamped by a structural engineer. BUILDING ROOF Building roof shall be minimum 26 U.S. standard gauge with standard baked enamel finish of the color selected by the county of Contra Costa. 0012: A f TECIINICAL SPECIFICATION FIRE COLLEGE SITE IMPROVaIENTS - PHASE V 1.10 CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND EARTMIORK All areas receiving improvements of whatever nature, such as, but not limited to street work, utilities, grading, whether in cut or in fill, shall be defined as "Areas of designated project earthwork". All grading shall be accomplished to the lines and grades shown on the Grading Plan and the Improvement Plans, and to a tolerance of plus or minus one tenth of a foot for all areas. All excess excavated materials shall be removed and disposed of away from the Lands of the Owner or shall be blade spread on the site on areas to be designated and as directed by the county. The Contractor shall notify the county immediately if it becomes apparent that an unbalance will occur in earthwork quantities. The county will then designate such areas as are required for borrow or for depositing excess material or if the county deems it desirable, will adjust the lot grades to avoid such unbalance. The Contractor shall adjust to finished grade after spreading of topsoil all manholes, valve boxes, or other structures that are within the limits of work. . 0012.3 .1 ru 2. WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES 2.10 SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required .for the complete installation and construction of water systems and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 2.20 STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS All components and workmanship involved in the construction of the water system must conform to the requirements of the Standards and Specifications of the County of Contra Costa and the Contra Costa County Water District. 001V r Y� ee 3. STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES 3.10 SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all .labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of storm water systems and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 3.20 MATERIALS 3.21 CAST IRON PIPE Cast iron pipe shall conform to the requirements of Section 71 of the California Standard Specifications, January 1975. Joints shall be calked with lead and packing. 3.22 FP-*IES AND GRATES AND COVERS Structural Steel: Shall be fabricated of structural grade mild steel, and hot dipped galvanized in accordance with ASTM Designation A-123. Cast Iron: Shall conform to Sections 55 and 70 of the California Standard Specifications, January 1975. 00128 3. STORM SEWERS A.:D APPURTENANCES (CUNT.) - 3.23 CATCH BASIN Catch basins shall be Christy V-32 or approved equal.. The catch basins shall have a concrete base with a minimum thickness of 6". 3.30 TRENCHING The County shall have the right to limit the amount of trench which shall be opened or partly opened at any time. The trench shall be excavated to the lines, grades, and dimensions shown on the plans and as specified herein. Excavated materials suitable for backfill shall be so placed so as not to restrict access or cause undue inconvenience to other Contractors, pedestrians or street traffic, and adjacent land owners. Suitable excess soils shall be blade spread in an area to be determined by the county. Undesirable materials shall be removed and disposed of off the lands of the owner at the Contractor's expense. County shall determine what material is undesirable. The Contractor shall at his own expense, furnish, put in place, and maintain such sheetings, braces, etc. , as may be required to support the sides of all excavations (whether above or below the pipe grade) , and to prevent any movement which could in any way diminish the required trench section, or otherwise injure or delay the work. The sheeting, braces, etc. shall be withdrawn so as to prevent any earth movement that might overload the pipe. All of the above-mentioned operations shall conform to the rules, orders, and regulations of the California Industrial Accident Commission. When the bedding material encountered is rock, the trench shall be excavated an additional distance of at least four (4) inches below grade for the bottom of the pipe, and the bottom of the trench shall be refilled with approved material moistened and compacted by tamping or other approved methods to the satisfaction of the county. When the bedding material encountered is mud, quicksand, or other unstable material, the bed shall be made firm and solid by removing said unstable material to a suffi,ient depth and replacing same with crushed rock, gravel or other approved material, well compacted into place in an approved manner and to the satisfaction of the county. When the trench has been inadvertently excavated by the Contractor to below the required grade, the bottom of the trench shall be 00129 w - 1 4� {i i 3. STORM SEWERS AND APPU TEINANCES (CONT.) refilled with approved material, moistened and compacted by tamping or by other approved method to the satisfaction of the county. 3.40 PIPE LAYING The Contractor shall remove water from the trenches by pumping or other methods during the laying, bedding, and backfill operations. The pipe shall be supported on firm, stable material free of lumps and rocks, for the full length of each pipe section. Where _ water is encountered in the trench, free draining gravel shall be used as required to drain the water and provide stable bedding. Bell holes shall be accurately placed and shall not be larger than reasonably required to make the joint. Before the pipe is laid, the interior of the joint of the preceding pipe shall be carefully cleaned. After each section of pipe has been laid to line and grade and joined to the preceding section, and after jointing procedure has commenced, there shall be no movement of the pipe in subsequent operations. Select material shall be placed and compacted uniformly on either side of the pipe to prevent movement. Particular care shall be taken to place well compacted material under the haunches of the pipe. Pipe joints shall be made to the manufacturer's recommendation and in accordance with the State of California Standard Speci- fications. The ends shall abut squarely and closely against each other in such a manner that there shall be no shoulder or unevenness along the interior of the pipe. Pipe placing shall occur on material sufficiently dry to permit approved jointing and the Contractor shall maintain the water level low enough to permit this when water is encountered. Before leaving the work at any time, the pipe shall be securely closed at its open end and after work is completed, the pipe shall be carefully and thoroughly cleared of all refuse, earth or any objectionable material to the county's approval. 3.50 BACKFILL No length of pipe shall be laid until the previous length has had sufficient material uniformly compacted under the haunches on either side of it to prevent further movement. After the pipe has been properly laid and inspected, select backfill material shall be placed around and over the pipe to a depth of six (6") inches and thoroughly compacted by hand -tamp- ing to a density of (95%) ninety-five percent of maximum in accordance with test method No. Calif. 216. All remaining back- fill material shall have a sand equivalent value of not less than NNW . 00130 I 3: STORM SEWERS AINll APPURTENANCES (CONT.) 30 and shall be placed in uniform horizontal layers not exceed- ing 0.67 feet in thickness, before compaction. Each layer of backfill material shall be compacted to a relative compaction of not less than (957-0) ninety-five percent. To prevent damage, the utmost care shall be exercised for the initial depth of backfill over the pipe. Compaction method shall be that which produces the required densities without damage to the pipe, and is acceptable to the county. . To prevent the pipe from floating out of position, the Contractor shall maintain the water in the trench sufficiently low, or main- tain sufficient weight on the pipe, so that the net load on the pipe is downward. 3.60 STRUCTURE AND APPURTENANCES All structures and appurtenances shall be installed at the locations and to the lines and dimensions shown on the plans and/or as herein specified. All structures and appurtenances shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the applicable section of the State of California Standard Specifications. 3.70 RESTORATION OF SURFACES All streets in which the surface is removed, broken or damaged, or in which the ground has caved in or settled, due to the in- stallation of the improvements, shall be resurfaced and brought to the original grade by the Contractor. The pavement replacement shall be in kind but in no case less than 8 inches of Class 2 un- treated base as set forth in Section 26 of the State of California Standard Specifications and with 22 inch asphalt concrete type "B" mineral aggregate with z inch maximum, medium grading in conform- ance with Section 39 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Before resurfacing material is placed, edges of pavements shall be saw cut to provide clean, solid, beveled faces, and shall be free of any loose material. The edges shall be treated prior to paving. All concrete curbs, gutters, driveways, and sidewalks which are broken, or damaged by the installation of the improvements shall be reconstructed by and at the expense of the Contractor, of which same kind of material and of the same dimensions as the original work, with the minimum requirements that concrete as specified herein shall be used. The repairs shall be made by removing and 00131 W_ t_ 3. STORM SEVERS AND APPURTENANCES (CONT.) replacing the entire portion between joints or scores, and not by refinishing the damaged part. Concrete for the purpose Ioutlined. in this paragraph shall be six (6) sacks per cubic yard. All work shall match the appearance of the existing improvements as nearly as practicable. Lampblack or other pigments may be added to the concrete to obtain the necessary results. 32 001 g 4. SUB-GRADE PREPARATION 4.10 SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construc- tion of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of sub-grade under pave- ment, curbs, gutters, walks, etc. , and other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified. i The work shall include all materials, equipment, and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 4.20 METHOD i All the work under this section shall conform to the applicable t provisions of the various Sections of the Standard Specifications referring to sub-grade preparation for the type of base material to be utilized. i 4.30 LIME TREATMENT r Lime treatment shall conform to Section 24 of the Standard Specifications. Special attention is directed to Section 24-1.04 ` Mixing. The distance which lime may be spread upon the prepared material ahead of the mixing operation will be determined by the county. 00133 �.. - _ 5.10 SUBBASE Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required ' for the complete installation and construction of the subbase and all other appurtenances shown on the plans .and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 5.20 MATERIALS Materials for aggregate subbase shall conform to Class 2 Aggregate Subbase as described in Section 25 of the State of California Standard Specifications. It shall have a minimum "R" value of 56 and a minimum sand equivalent value of 30. 5.30 CONSTRUCTION Class 2 Subbase shall be placed spread and compacted in conformance with Section 25-1.04 and Section 25-1.05 of the State of California Standard Specifications. 00134 h 6.10 BASE Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construc-. tion of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of the base and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working . installation. 6.20 MiATERIALS Materials for aggregate base shall conform to Class 2 Aggregate Base as described in Section 26 of the State of California Standard Specifications. It shall have a minimum "R" value -of 76 and a minimum sand equivalent value of 30. 6.30 CONSTRUCTION Class 2 Base shall be placed, spread and compacted in conformance with Section 26-1.04 and Section 26-1.05 of the State of California Standard Specifications. The completed base shall not vary more than 0.05 foot from theoretical grade at any point. 00135 tI 7: ASPHALT CONCRETE 7.10 SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, mate- rials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of asphalt concrete pavement and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all material, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously* necessary to make a complete working installation. Asphalt Concrete shall be Type B and shall conform to the applicable provisions of Section 39 of the Standard Specifications. 7.20 MTERIALS Aggregate shall be Type B and shall conform to the applicable pro- visions of Section 39 of the Standard Specifications. The grading of the combined aggregates shall conform to the i inch maximum size, "medium" grading as listed in said Section 39. Paving asphalt to be mixed with the aggregate, shall be a steam- refined asphalt, penetration grade 85-100 in conformance with Section 92 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Liquid asphalt used for prime coat unless otherwise directed by the county shall be grade MC-70 in conformance with Section 93 of the State of California Standard Specifications. . Asphaltic emulsion fortack coat (paint binder) and fog seal coat shall be "Mixing Type Emulsion" manufactured from liquid paving asphalt penetration grade 120-150 conforming to Section 94 of the State of California Standard Specifications. All joints or cut edges to be coated before paving. 7.30 CONSTRUCTION Asphalt concrete shall be proportioned, mixed, and placed in con- formance with the applicable provisions in Section 39 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Before placing asphalt concrete on an untreated base, a liquid asphalt prime coat shall be applied to the base course in the areas to be surfaced in accordance with the provisions in Section 39 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Prime coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.25 gallons per square yard. Asphalt (for 3" finished thickness) shall be laid in two passes of 12" compacted thickness each pass. i - 00136 E 7. ASP1L1LT CONCRETE (CONT.) 7.40 CONSTRUCTION i Before placing asphalt concrete, and asphalt emulsion tack coat (Paint Binder) shall be applied to all vertical surfaces of existing pavement, curbs, gutters, and construction joints and to existing pavement to be surfaced; all in accordance with the pro- visions of Section 39 of the State of California Standard Speci- fications. Tack coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.10 gallons per square yard. A fog seal coat shall be applied to all finished surfaces of asphalt concrete pavement in accordance with the provisions of Section 37 of the State of California Standard Specifications. Fog seal coat shall be applied at the rate of 0.05 gallons per square yard. 7.50 ADJUSDIENT OF STRUCTURE All manhole rims, valve boxes, or other structures shall be adjusted to the design grade after placement of the base but prior to application of the prime coat or paving. A Class A concrete collar shall be poured around each ring, casting, or box. The top of the concrete collar shall be maintained at finished base grade, and the asphalt concrete will extend over the collar. 00131 y 8.10 STRIPING Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, materials, tools, transportation, equipinent, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities -required for the complete installation of the painted stripes shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 8.20 MATERIALS Materials for striping shall conform to the provisions of Section 91 of the State of California Standard Specifications. 8.30 CONSTRUCTION All painting shall conform to the provisions of Section 59 of the State of California Standard Specifications. 00138 _ � a l 9. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE 9.10 SCOPE OF WORK Work under this section shall include furnishing all labor, mate- rials, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of Portland Cement Concrete facilities, structures, and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein. The work shall include all materials, equipment, and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the plans, but which are obviously necessary to make a complete working installation. 9.20 MATERIALS 9.21 CONCRETE Concrete shall be Class A with no less than six (6) sacks of cement per cubic yard, and shall have a twenty-eight (28) day compressive strength of at least 3,000 PSI. 9.22 CDMNT Cement shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation C150 Type II. 9.23 AGGREGATES Aggregates shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation C33 and shall be 3/4 inch maximum size. 9.24 WATER Water shall be clear and free from injurious amounts of oil, acid, alkali, organic matter, or other deleterious substances. 9.25 REINFORCED BARS Reinforcing bars shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation A15, intermediate grade, and deformed in accordance with ASTM Designation A305. 9.26 PREMOLDED EXPANSION JOINT FILLER Premolded expansion joint filler shall conform to the requirements of ASTM Designation D994 and shall be 4 inch thick, the full depth of the concrete section. They shall be placed at a maximum spacing of twenty-five feet (259. 00139 xs , ,: ty 9. POUTLAND MIENT CONCRETE (CONT.) . 9.27 FO%M LUMBER Form lumber shall be Douglas Fir plywood, "plyform" 5/8 inch minimum thickness, or Douglas Fir lumber one inch nominal thickness, S4S. 9.28 ADMIXTURES None shall be used. 9.30 FORMS Forms shall be smooth, mortar-tight, true to the required lines and grades, and of sufficient strength to resist springing out of shape during the placing of concrete. All dirt, chips, sawdust and other foreign matter shall be removed from forms before any concrete is deposited therein. Forms previously used shall be thoroughly cleaned of all dirt, mortar, and foreign matter before being reused. Before concrete is placed in forms, all inside surfaces of the forms shall be thoroughly coated with a form of oil approved by the county. All exposed sharp edges shall be chamfered with triangular fillets not less than 3/4 inch by 3/4 inch to prevent mortar runs and to preserve smooth straight lines unless otherwise directed by the county. Fillets shall be surfaced on all sides. Surfaces shall be formed of strips of matched lumber not over 4 inches wide, or plywood, or steel, as approved by the county. Forms shall not be removed until the concrete has attained suffi- cient strength to prevent any damage thereto. As a minimum requirement, forms shall be left in place for three (3) days or as directed by the county. 9.40 REINFORCED STEEL Bars shall be fabricated to the shapes and dimensions as shown on the plans, accurately placed, securely tied at all intersections and splices with 18 gauge black annealed wire, and adequately held in position by spacers, chairs or other approved supports. Splices shall be lapped at least 32 diameters. Before placing concrete all reinforcing bars shall be thoroughly cleaned of loose mill scale, rust, mortar, oil, dirt, and coatings of any character that would destroy or reduce bond. 9.50 MIXING AND PLACING CONCRETE Ready-mixed concrete shall be batched at a central batching plant and transit-mixed in truck mixers, in accordrnce with the require- ments of ASTM Designation C94. Batching weights of all aggregates 00140 9. PORTLAIND CEMOZ1' CONCRETE (CONT.) per cubic yard shall be furnished by the Contractor to the county. The total elapsed time between introduction of mixing water to . the batch and placing the concrete shall not exceed 60 minutes. Job-mixed concrete shall be mixed in a power-operated rotary batch mixer, with hoppers and controls permitting accurate measurement by weight of all materials. Equipment and procedures shall be subject to the approval of the county. The concrete shall be of a consistency suitable for satisfactory placing with a reasonable amount of vibration and spading. Slump for concrete 4 inches. In all cases, the water-cement ratio shall be maintained to produce concrete of the strength specified. The batch plant shall submit a cylinder to the county for 3000 P.S.I. concrete with 3/4" rock and maximum of 4" slump. The concrete shall be depoisted as nearly as practicable in the final position, to avoid rehandling and flowing. It shall be deposited in uniform horizontal layers, avoiding inclined planes, and each layer shall be placed before initial set of previous layer. Concrete shall be compacted as it is placed to obtain maxi-mum vibrators submerged in the concrete, supplemented by hand spading, rodding, and tamping as required. External vibration of forms will not be permitted. Construction joints shall be avoided as much as possible due to stoppage of work, except :where indicated on the plans. Before placing new concrete, the surface of the concrete in place shall be thoroughly roughened, cleaned of laitance, foreign matter, and loose particles, and given a coat of cement grout, consisting of one (1) part cement to 2-21 parts sand, for proper bond. 9.60 CURING All concrete work shall be cured by applying to the surface immed- iately after it has been finished, a uniform coating of practically colorless impervious membrane, in accordance with the Standard Specifications. The Coating shall be sprayed on the concrete by means of a pressure sprayer in a continuous film of uniform color and thickness. Sufficient pressure shall be maintained to atomize the liquid into a fine spray or mist. The liquid shall be applied in such quantities as will seal the exposed surface thoroughly. The concrete shall be barricaded from traffic and damage during the curing period of seventy-two (72) hours. Broken or damaged seal shall be immediately repaired with additional curing compound. 9.70 INSPECTION AND TESTS All work shall be subject to the inspection of the county. The Contractor shall notify the county at least one working day prior to each concrete pour, to permit inspection of forms and rein- forcement, and to witness concrete placing if desired. No 00141 I, g. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (CONT-) concrete shall be placed until the county has approved the forms and reinforcement. When so requested by the county, the Contractor shall .furnish mill test reports on the cement, reinforcing bars and aggregates, showing compliance with the respective ASTM specifications. The county will make concrete tests cylinders and slump tests as deemed necessary to determine compliance with specifications. i i i ON42 JO.. METAL BUILDING (ALTERNATE 1) •, 10.10 SCOPE OF WORK . Work under this section shall include- furnishing all labor, tools, transportation, equipment, temporary construction of every nature, services and facilities required for the complete installation and construction of the ;fetal Building and all other appurtenances shown on the plans and/or specified herein including but not limited to: a. Pre-manufactured metal building (Frame and Roof) b. Fence walls, including battens c. Concrete floor E 10.20 MATERIALS The Metal Building shall be in strict compliance to the "Recommended Guide Specification for Pre-Engineered Metal Buildings" as published by the Metal Building Manufacturers Association, 2130 Keith Building, Cleveland, Ohio. 10.30 STANDARD DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS Contractor shall submit manufacturers detailed design information of all manufactured items, doors, hardware, etc. Shop and Erection Drawings shall be provided to the owner to obtain a building permit. Appropriate calculation and sketches shall also be provided as required and all drawings must be stamped by a structural engineer. 10.40 BUILDING ROOF Building roof shall be minimum 26 U.S. standard gauge with standard baked enamel finish of the color selected by the county of Contra Costa. 10.50 FENCE 'SIDING The fence siding for the metal building shall conform to Section 80-4 of the State of California Standard Specifica- tions. Wood battens, with a dimension of 3/8" x 2" shall be inserted into the fence fabric for its entire height. r 00143 fI i1a T) =T3 ANP Ti if.li..•,::• RECO.. �.., - --- - -To CIE.R1, BOARD OF at o`clock SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Records J. R. OLSSON, Co•.:nty P.ecorder Fee S Official WARD OF SUi LRI'ISORS, -COYcTR4 COSTA..COJ;;1Y,• CALIFOJ;::IA. In the ?Satter of Accepting and Giving ) PWSOLUTIM" OF ;,CCEFTI.ECE Notice of Completion of Contract with ) ind NOTICE OF CO :1)LETIO;1 Mountain Construction, Inc. - ) (C.C. S§30$6, 3093) Project No. 8521-0925-75 ) RESOLUTIO11 110_ 76/1041 - The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County wSOLYEES T11AT: The County of Contra Costa on September 7, 1976 contracted -»ith Mountain Construction,_Inc.. P. O. Box 116, San Ramon, California 94583 Tune -and- Address -of Con..ractor) for installation of a storm drainage system in the area of Olive Drive and Kirker Pass Road in Concord, California. Project No. 8521-0925-75, .with American Fidelity Fire Insurance Company of New York as s,.rely, -Q.a_me of bonca:g Co=p=y) for -work .to be performed on t're grounds of the Cownty; and The Publin Norks Director reports that said x:orh has been inspected and complies with the aproved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and reco=ends its acceptance -as complete as Of November 22. 1976 i Therefore, said—work is accepted as--completed -on said date, a^d the Cler): shall file v ith-the CoL.ity Recorder •a-copy of this-. Resolution and Notice 'as a Notice of Completion for -said contract_- PASSED A;M. AL PT nD Oil November 30, 1976 CERTIFI C 9iI021- an d.liRIs I C:.•I Oa I certi�y that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolu- tion u-ld acceptance dull' adopted and entcrcd 07 t.^. Oi 1his )3;)a_-d1s neeting on the above date. I declare uP.d:.•r penalty of - perji:Ty that the foregoing is true ?_nd correct_ Dated: November 30, 1976 J. R_ OLSSO;:, County Clerk & at J:artin_s, California ex: officio Clerk of the Board i:pu L ler - Originator: Public Works`Departnent. Construction Division CC:�RCC:OrQ :7V ri:Lu111 Contractor Auditor _76/1041 _ City of Concord, Attention: C. Tedeschi 00144 'i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Conveyance of an ) Offer of Dedication to the City of ) Concord of a Portion of Property ) RESOLUTION NO. 7611042 along Smith Lane. ) (Re: 2025-2025-7712-618) ) (Govt. C. Sec. 25526.6) _ ) Health and Safety.C. Sec. 13 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, for and on behalf of Contra Costa County Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 and as the Board of- Directors f Directors of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, RESOLVES THAT: The Building Projects Division of the Public Works Department is planning to install frontage improvements along Smith Lane as part of a development project at the Fire College site in the City of Concord.- In connection with the installation of the frontage improvements, the City requires an Offer of Dedication of a 28-foot strip of land containing portions of two separate parcels owned by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District and one parcel owned by Contra Costa County for and on behalf of Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 respectively. These parcels are more particularly described in "Exhibit A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Board hereby, for and on behalf of Contra Costa County Storm Brain Maintenance District No. 1 and as the Board of Directors of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, DETE(L'II NES AND FINDS that an Offer of Dedication of said 28-foot strip of land for street and highway purposes is in the public interest and will not substantially conflict or interfere with the use of the remaining property owned by the County and the District. The Board hereby APPROVES the delivery of an Offer of Dedication of said strip of land to the City of Concord for street and highway purposes pursuant to Government Code Section 25526.6 and the Chairman of this Board is AUTHORIZED to execute said Offer on behalf of the County and the District. PASSED on November 30, 1976 unanimously by the Supervisors present. CPJ:dlb Originator: Public Works Department, Real Property Division cc: County Administrator Building Projects Public Works C.C.C. Fire Protection District via Building Projects Attention Ted Smith County Counsel RESOLUTION 110. 76/ 1042 00145 J I E`CffIAIT A All that certain real property situate in the City of Concord, County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Portion of Lot 2 in Block 2, as designated on the map entitled "Hap of E. A. -Smith's Subdivision No. 1," which map was filed in the office of . the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, on January 3, 1911, in Book 3 of flaps, at page 75, further described as follows: BEGINNING on the centerline of a 40 feet in width road known as Smith Lane, formerly Walnut Avenue, at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence from said Point of Beginning along said centerline - South 56" 30' West 579 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 South 360 51' 30" East 28.05 feet; thence leavilhg said southeasterly line parallel and distant 28.00 feet at right angles from said centerline North 56" 30' East 579 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 2; thence along said northeasterly line North 36" 51' 30" test 28.05 feet to the Point of Beginning. P. N. 145-070-08, 09, & 24 00146. r Recorded at the request of: CITY OF CONCORD After recording return to: City Clerk 1950 Parkside Concord, California 94520 OFFER OF DEDICATION (Street and Highways Purpose) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, for and on behalf of Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT the undersigned, being the present title owners of record of the herein described parcel of land, do hereby make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the CITY OF CONCORD, and its successor or assign, for street and highway purposes, the real property situated in the City of Concord, County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: DESCRIBED IN THE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF It is understood and agreed that the CITY OF CONCORD and its successor or assign shall incur no liability with respect to such offer of dedication, and shall not assume any responsibility for the offered parcel of land or any improvements thereon or therein, until such offer has been accepted by appropriate action of the City Council, its successor or assign or by the City Manager on behalf of the City of Concord. The provisions hereby shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, successors, assigns, and personal representatives of the respective parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument this 30th day of November 1976. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT By: t v>n�o 1 nL STATE or C.•:runtu 1 Ch i 'an of the Bo rd fif Supervisors CGM1:tU GSia CAu7(iT u 9t rt3: 4..7Y an airman of the B rd of Supervisors as Chairqp of the James P. Kenny _ Board of Directors of/the Contra -_-== t•a -_ =-ax•tia ,. Costa County Fire Protection District :"z::,;Cl Q%C,t of tet !b——..j :4y.: CX ancr la", Lai" Ins Re a_. Attest: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk tr.C•, a-C a.•*+.wr.��.`9 is mt =na: L.L t.:j.•c IIaa zt�:cl-a t•ia v:.vt.n-wt. Caut7 dna a(m,bdv dei►ut az_ a of r,xnicy,. By: Deputy 00147 0014'7 k SIT A All that certain real property situate in the City of Concord, County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: Portion of Lot 2 in Block 2, as designated on the map entitled"?dao of E. A. Smith's Subdivision No. l," which map was filed in the office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, on January 3, 1911, in Book 3 of Paps, at page 75, further described as follows: BEGINNING on the centerline of a 40 feet in width road known as Smith Lane, formerly Walnut Avenue, at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence from said Point of Beginning along said centerline South 560 30' West 579 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 2; thence along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2 South 360 51' 30" East 28.05 feet; thence leaving said southeasterly line parallel and distant 28.00 feet at right angles from said centerline North 560 30' East 579 feet to the northeasterly line of said Lot 2; thence along said northeasterly line ::orth 360 51' 30" West 28.05 feet to the Point of Be7ginning. P. N. 145-070-08, 09, & 24 00148 f, S y _ •l LOT2 tAOST W63rg"%f. X40& - _ _ :SCALE I"= foe. '= -.� 19, ZT It .. �.GRENOLA: LDT cn NIAGARA COURT r j. [AOS' NolzTti�144Y . C.tR. LOTZ.. t : PD)Jvr OF BcGfr JVljVG- 00149 : FLAT civa SMITH LANE DEDICATION ... _ mom wo m �1 In tela Board of Suca:visors of Conga Costa County, Siate of California November 30 , 19 26. In the Allotter of Amending Resolution No. 76/638 Establishing Rates to be Paid to _RESOLUTION NO. 76/1043 Child-Care Institutions WHEREAS this Board on July 27, 1976, adopted Resolution No. 76/638 establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for the fiscal year 1976-77; and _ WHEREAS the Board has been advised that certain institutions should be added and deleted on the approved list; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution No. 76/638 is hereby amended as detailed below: ADD THE FOLLOWING INSTITUTION MONTHLY RATE Teen Enrichment Center $ 928 DELETE THE FOLLOWING INSTITUTION Dismas Group, Inc./Milpitas $ 950 PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 30, 1976. Orig.: County Probation Officer cc: County Probation Officer Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Superintendent of Schools RESOLUTION N0. 76/1043 00150 i Ea IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: ) Fixing Rates for ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1044 Foster Home Care. ) WHEREAS Section 900 of the Welfare and Institutions Code of the State of California authorizes the Board of Supervisors to establish the maximum amounts which the Juvenile Court may order the County to pay for the support and maintenance of wards or dependent children of the Juvenile Court or of minor persons concerning whom a petition has been filed in accordance with the provisions of the Welfare and Institutions Code; and WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors wishes to establish an objective, systematic method for determining the maximum amount which the Juvenile Court may order the County to pay for such care; and WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors wishes to establish the maximum amount for the payment of care of children placed in foster homes licensed by the Contra Costa County Social Service Department or the State Department of Health; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THIS BOARD RESOLVED that, as recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny, serving in place of W. N. Boggess, and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty), the following maximum monthly rates for foster home care in Contra Costa County shall apply effective September 1, 1976, except for additional amounts established by the Foster Care Rate Setting Policy as contained herein: Age Rate 0 - 6 $150 7 - 12 $170 13 - 21 $200 BE IT BY THE BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that in accordance with regulations of the State Department of Health, children placed by Contra Costa County Probation or Social Service departments in other counties of the State shall be paid for at the rates established by the Board of Supervisors of such other counties. BE IT BY THE BOARD FURTHER RESOLVED that a revised rate setting policy shall take effect September 1, 1976, or as soon thereafter as it can be administratively implemented by the Social Service and Probation departments. This rate setting policy shall provide that the County Welfare Director and County Probation Officer, or their designees, shall be responsible to set the amount of any additional rate to be paid based on specific criteria which shall include but not be limited to the level of physical and emotional problems presented by the child, the level of auxiliary services needed by the child, and the ability and willingness of the foster parents to provide for the needs of the child. The payment of these additional rates shall follow a formula developed by the County Welfare Director and County Probation Officer which shall be approved in advance by the County Administrator. Payment of any additional rates shall be made within the appropriations provided for this purpose by the Board of Supervisors. RESOLUTION NO. 76/1044 00151 -19-JL The County Welfare Director and County Probation Officer are authorized to adopt regulations to implement this resolution. Until a given case is reviewed under this revised policy, the rate paid for a child shall remain at the level authorized on September 1, 1976. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Social Service Department and Proba- tion Department are AUTHORIZED to pay a per diem rate for children placed in emergency foster homes for shelter care on the following schedule: AGE RATE 0 - 6 $ 8 7- - 12 $ 9 13 - 17 $ 10 Length of stay and payment in emergency foster home care is strictly limited by Social Service Department and Probation Department policy. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Social Service Department is AUTHORIZED to pay, with the limitation of a maximum of 50 beds at the subsidized rate of $50 per bed, not to exceed $250 per home for each month, and that the Probation Department is AUTHORIZED to pay, with the limitation of a maximum of 20 beds at the subsidized rate of $50 per bed, not to exceed $150 per home for each month. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director, Human Resources Agency and the County Probation Officer are AUTHORIZED to execute agreements with parents of licensed emergency care foster homes for the placement of children through seventeen years of age eligible for the special emergency placement board and care rate. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Social Service and Probation Departments are AUTHORIZED to provide needed initial clothing for each child placed or re-placed in a foster home or institution, provided that a limit of one allowance per child per year is not exceeded. The maximum allowance shall be: AGE ALLOWANCE 0 - 6 $117 7 - 12 $180 13 - 21 $239 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that resolution No. 76/638, which established a schedule of rates for institutions used for placement of delinquent and dis- turbed children (effective July 1, 1976), is HEREBY AMENDED by deleting the following sentence from said resolution: "Placement in any institution whose monthly rate exceeds $1000 requires the specific approval of the Board of Supervisors.) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 76/1034, adopted November 23, 1976, is HEREBY AMENDED to include placement of minors by the Probation Department in emergency foster homes at specified rates with a maximum limit of 20 beds at the subsidized rate of $50 per bed, not to exceed $150 per home for each month. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, and County Probation Officer are ordered to report to the Board quarterly, beginning with the quarter ending December 31, 1976, on the number of children in institu- tional placements at the beginning of the quarter, the number placed and removed during the quarter, and the number remaining in institutional placement at the end of the quarter. They shall also report on the number of foster home payments made in excess of the basic rates set forth above and shall include a report on the status of the foster care and institutional placement budgets. RESOLUTION NO. 76/1044 00152 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the rates specified in this resolution shall be interpreted to be maximum amounts to be paid with lower or going rates to be paid wherever feasible. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that resolution No. 76/1034 adopted November 23, 1976, which fixed foster hone care rates, is hereby superseded by this resolution effective November 30, 1976. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on November 30, 1976. ORIG: Probation Department cc: County Probation Officer Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Superintendent-of Schools RESOLUTION NO. 76/1044 00153 r� 1 2 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 3 4 In the Matter of the Condemnation ) 5 of additional property, Lines E ) RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY and E-1, Marsh Creek, Brentwood ) NO. 76/1045 6 area, W. 0. #8514 ) 7 (Flood Control Zone 1) ) 8 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as ex officio .9 the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control 10 and Water Conservation District, by vote of two-thirds or more 11 of all its members, RESOLVES THAT: 12 The Contra Costa County Flood Control District intends to 13 construct a public improvement in the Brentwood area at harsh 14 Creek and to acquire real property in connection therewith. Said 15 real property is described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and 16 incorporated herein by this reference. 17 On October 26, 1976 this Board passed a resolution of inten- 18 tion to adopt a Resolution of Necessity to acquire real property 19 by eminent domain, in the Brentwood area, for Marsh Creek Lines 20 E and E-1 and fixed November 30, 1976 in its chambers, Adminis- 21 tration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the 22 time and place for a hearing thereon. Said resolution was ordered 23 to be published and posted as required by law, which was done as 24 shown by affidavits on file with this Board. 25 The hearing was held at that time and place, and this Board, 26 after hearing the evidence presented, hereby finds, determines 29 and declares as follows: 28 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed 29 project; 30 2. The proposed project is planned and located in the 31 manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good 32 and least private injury;.and 33 3. The property described herein is necessary for the 34 proposed project_ 35 The County Counsel of this County is hereby AUTHORIZED and 36 EMPOWERED: —SOLUTION 110. 76/1045 00151 A �S {{I1I1I I 1 To acquire in the District's name, by condemnation for 2 titles, easements and rights of way in and to the said real 3 property or interest(s) described in the attached Exhibit "A" in 4 accordance with the provisions for eminent domain in the Code of 5 Civil Procedure and the Constitution of California; 6 Parcel l: --Fee-simple. 7 Parcel 2: A: temporary construction easement. - a To prepare and prosecute in the County's name such proc6ed- 9 ings in the proper court as are necessary for such acquisition; 10 and 11 To deposit the probable amount of compensation, based on an 12 appraisal, and to apply to said court for an order permitting the 13 County to take immediate possession and use of said real property 14 for said public uses and purposes. 15 PASSED AND ADOPTED on November 30, 1976 by the following vote: 16 AYES: Supervisors - J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, - 17 NOES: Supervisors E. q. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. None. 18 ABSENT: Supervisors - A. M. Dias. 19 20 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and 21 regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the vote of two- 22 thirds or more of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, 23 California, at a meeting of said Board on the date indicated. 24 25 Dated: November 30, 1976 26 27 28 cc: Public Works 29 Flood Control J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and Real Property ex officio Clerk of the Board 30 County Counsel of Supervisors of Contra Costa 31 County, California 32 33 By: 2z Deputy N. Pous 34 35 36 RESOLUTION '407 6/1045 00155 - ___ Marsh Creek Lines E E-1 EXHIBIT "A" Portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 North, Range 2 East, Blount Diablo Meridian, and more particularily described as a portion of that parcel of land described in the deed to Rudolph J. Vera and Carmen Vera, his wife, and to Louis J. Mendoza and Catherine Mendoza, his wife, recorded January 11, 1965 in Book 4780 of Official Records at page 137, Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, described as follows: Parcel One Beginning at the intersection of the south line of Lone Tree Way, a County road, with the southwesterly line of Fairview Avenue, a County road, thence southeasterly along said southwesterly line of Fairview Avenue, South 340 46' O1" East (The bearing South 34' 46' 01" East being taken for the purpose of this description) 196.00 feet; thence leaving said south- westerly line, South 55* 13' 59" West 15.00 feet to a point on a line •4". parallel with and 15.00 feet measured at right angles from said southwesterly line of Fairview Avenue, thence along said parallel line Horth'34° 46' 01 hest 148.00 feet; thence leaving said parallel line, North 500 46' 01" West 77.12 feet to the southerly line of Lone Tree Way; thence southeasterly along said southerly line, South 88° 58' 35" East 44.71 feet to the point of beginning. Containing an area of 3646 square feet more or less. Parcel Two A temporary construction easement to expire on July 1, 1977 or on completion of construction of Marsh Creek, Lines E and E-1, whichever occurs first, described as follows: A strip of land 4.00 feet in width lying contiguous to and southwesterly of Parcel One described above. The southwesterly line of Parcel One being the northeasterly line of Parcel Two_ The northerly terminus of said 4.00 foot wide strip of land being the southerly line of Lone Tree Way and the easterly terminus being the southwesterly line of Fairview Avenue. Containing an area of 976 square feet more or less. - 00156 s� t .i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving r the Revaluation of Ground Rental for Navajo Aviation RESOLUTION NO. 76/1046 Fixed Base Operation ) (Buchanan Field Airport). ) ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Under Section Fourth of the Lease between the County of Contra Costa, as Lessors, and Patterson Aircraft Company, dated December 19, 1961' and as amended to include the additional area by Board Resolution No. 1416 on November 20, 1962 and assigned to Navajo Aviation, Inc. by Assignment of Lease approved in Board Resolution No. 71/759 dated November 16, 1971, the lease provides for revaluation of the ground rental at the end of 5-year periods of the original lease terms. NOW, THEREFORE, this Board hereby approves the Public Works Director's recommendation that the ground rental of said lease and amendment be increased from a total of ground rent of $2,148.00 per year to $2,700.00 per year or $225.00 per month, effective January 1, 1977; pursuant to the rights of the Lessee to appeal the rental increase by arbitration of appraisers as provided in said Section Fourth. PASSED on November 30, 1476 unanimously by Supervisors present. Originator: Public Works Dept., Real Property Division cc: Lessee (c/o R/P) Airport Manager Public Works (2) Auditor Assessor Administrator RESOLUTION 110. 76/ 1046 00157 f! 4 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) Consent for Sublease of Navajo Aviation Leasehold ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/2047 Interest and Improvements ) (Buchanan Field Airport). ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: An Agreement entitled "Sublease of Airport Property" between the County, as Lessor; Navajo Aviation, Inc., as Lessee; and Laron Enterprises, Incorporated, as Sub-Lessee, has been presented to this Board. Said agreement provides for the consent of the Lessor in paragraph 4 " to sublet the lease between Contra Costa County. and Patterson Aircraft Company, dated December 19, 1961. Said lease was subsequently assigned to Navajo Aviation, Inc., pursuant to Board Resolution No. 71/759 on November 16, 1971. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said Agreement be and the same is hereby APPROVED and the Chairman of this Board is authorized to execute the consent on behalf of the County of Contra Costa to be delivered to said Lessee for acceptance. PASSED on November 30, 1976 unanimously by Supervisors present. Originator: Public :Works Dept., Real Property Division cc: Lessee (c/o R/P) County Administrator Airport Manager Public Mortis Dept. (2) Assessor Auditor RESOLUTION I1O. 76/1047 O0158 _ li Ism SUBLEASE OF AIRPORT PROPERTY This Sublease is entered into November 23 1976, to be effective December 1, 1976, between NAVAJO AVIATION, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, herein called "NAVAJO and LARON ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, herein called "LARON". RECITALS A. NAVAJO is presently the Lessee of certain real property located at Buchannon Field, Contra Costa County, Cali- fornia, (called herein the "Airport Land") described in Exhibit "A", pursuant to the terms of a certain lease (herein called the "County Lease") , a copy of which is marked Exhibit "B". Said exhibits are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. B. LARON desires to sub-lease from NAVAJO the Air- port Land presently leased to NAVAJO by the County, subject to the sub-lease being converted into an outright assignment of the County Lease upon LARON'S exercising an option to purchase the Leasehold Improvements, which option is granted concurrently herewith. 1. In consideration of LARON'S entering into an Improvement Lease with NAVAJO concurrently herewith, and, for other valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, NAVAJO hereby subleases to LARON the property referred to as the "Airport Land", which is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and which is the land leased to NAVAJO by the County of Contra Costa pursuant to the County Lease. 2. The term of this sublease shall be coextensive with the term of the County Lease set forth above, provided that PAicrofilmed with board order, -1- -' O0159 - r�'^.�5�- �vryu{"Y ,. this sublease shall sooner. terminate (1) on sooner termination of the County Lease, or (2) on LARON'S exercise of its purchase options, referred to in Recital B of this Agreement, provided the County of Contra Costa consents to assignment of the County Lease to LARON, or on other or further agreement of the parties. 3. The subleased premises shall be used by LARON only for those purposes for which they may be used as set forth in the County Lease- or as allowed by the County of Contra Costa. 4. LARON hereby expressly assumes and agrees to perform all the obligations and convenants required by the County Lease to be kept or performed by 14AVAJO as Lessor thereof, pro- vided, however, that nothing herein contained shall be construed so as to deprive LARON of its right to surrender or otherwise terminate this sublease as provided by law and thereby relieve itself of all further obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed it on the day and year first above written. LARON ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED B 1 And NAVAJO AVIATION, INCORPORATED ?�zd -2- , 00160 k • The County of Contra Costa, California, does hereby consent to the foregoing sublease; provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve NAVAJO AVIATION, INCORPORATED, of any of .its obligations on the aforesaid County Lease or . with respect to the aforesaid Airport Land. DATED: November 3 o 1976 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a Political Subdivision of the State of California By T a rman of thd B rd of Supervisors ATTEST: Recommended for Approval: J. R. OLSSON County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Principal - Rea l •Property Agent Supervisors By P� - Deputy Public t,t rY. erector J� Arrpoft Manager Approved as to Form: 1 County Administrato JOHN B. CLAUSEN7 COUNTY COUNSEL By ty -3- _ 00161 -��y�'r. .�^�.�` I'r�..:� .��:..►�.�''� �'\'�C��.r'''.�Ir`�r= -.t.•y.��1f•,•��'7✓•.�1da R,�•'f.:11`� ���...�!_. tet.-•... • .. ..u:... w Vii:. ....i.,4. I s i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Establishing Volunteer Program ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1048 For Animal Control Center ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: ! The Special Animal Control Review Committee, appointed by the Board of Supervisors, and the Assistant Agricultural Commissioner- Director of Weights and Measures has recommended the implementation of an Animal Control Center Volunteer Program. Therefore,. said program is established effective December 1, 1976 with the following specifications: A. Volunteer Personnel 1. All persons serving under this program shall be selected by the County Animal Control Director. 2. All persons serving under this program shall be in an unpaid volunteer status. 3. Volunteers shall not be considered employees of the County. B. Tenure All volunteers serve at the pleasure of the County Animal Control Director, and have no civil service or other status as County employees. C. Duties As directed by the County Animal Control Director, these volunteers will: 1. Help reunite owners with their lost animals, and 2. Assist in the adoption of new pets. D. Expenses The County will not reimburse volunteers for any expenses incurred in their volunteer service under this program. E. Administration The administration of this --rograrr shall be the responsibility of the County Agricultural Con--niss;over-Director of Weights and Measures, who is hereby authorized to pro=mulgate recesaar;; regulations governing this program as:d to purchase necessary supplies and equipment. PASSED on Noverber 30 , 1976, unan=nously by ;,he Supervisors present. TAC:ne cc: Agricultural Connissioner County Counsel County tdininistrato�EuOLUTION NO. 76/1048 00162 l -IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF _CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll _ ) -RESOLUTION NO. 76/1049 of Contra Costa County } WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following claimants have been found to be eligible for the homeowner's property tax exemption in accordance with Section 218 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as amended by AB 2972, Chapter 1060, effective September 20, 1976, as an urgency statute. Therefore, the -exemption should be allowed as stated below. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 9-021 UE7-1 §1385 ?Litchell, Jin E. 111-011-1 08001 1500 Martinez, T. 53 -070-012-9 08048 1390 Russell, Tommy & Hattie Lee 538-190-008-2 08001 $1505 Williams, Rosie L. R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor PASSED by The Board on November 30, 1976. Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1049 00163 :i 1 1 . .."T'.:-::..: r•,,.. ;..,. ,ri,,L?.a, .h.,i,_ ,a'„R _aa._ .,. s. .. �'�a� .. qc.i. _ , �'"`�., ., 3..,_. .ee.:t.- .;fid ..c, ..... ...c...:.L:_ _. .. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1050 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers 'in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofora or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following claimants have been found to be eligible for the homeownerls property tax exemption in accordance with Section 218 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as amended by AB 2972, Chapter 1060, effective September 20, 1976, as an urgency statute. Because the applications were filed with the Assessor subsequent to April 15, 1976, a partial exemption of $1,400 or 80 percent of the assessed value of the property should be allowed in accordance with Section 275(c) of the Revenue and Taxation Code: The veteran's exemption now on the roll should be removed. Tax Rate Parcel Number Area Allow Remove Assessee 073-124-01 —307 13 0 Goodlaw, Florida 098-313-002-2 79049 1100 $1000 Zerr, John R. & Leta L. 112-181-008-7 02002 400 $1000 Browne, Geraldine Lillian 374-021-008-7 05001 $1400 $1000 Dye, Lloyd & Evelyn 518-320-010-3 08001 $11100 $1000 Flinders, Frederick J. & Helen L, I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: 0. SEATON JOffiT B. CL�II 1 , County Counsel Assistant Assessor / By Deputy PASSED by the Board on Novermer 30, 1976. Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 1 tll/18/76 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1050 00164 i I I' IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County _ ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1051 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee failed to report accurately taxable tangible property, to the extent that this failure caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll had the property been reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the property not reported should be assessed as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and interest on taxes thereon should be added in accordance with Section S06: Gordon H. Ball, Inc. P. 0. Box 278 Danville, CA 94S26 Assessed Code-Assmt.# For Year Class Property Valuation 79038-8005 1972-73* Pers Prop $. 3,750 98012-8003 1973-74 Pers Prop 400 98012-8004 1974-75 Pers Prop 6,070 - 98012-800S 197S-76 Pers Prop 47S Assessee has been notified. *Assessee has waived statute of limitations.- 0. SEATON, Assistant ssessor tll/24/76 PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 76/1051 Page 1 of 1 00165 i, IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the natter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll j RESOLUTION NO. 76/1052 of Contra Costa County ) WH:-'K.4EAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, TBSREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers-in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following claimants have been found to be eligible for the homeowner's property tax exemption in accordance with Section 218 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as amended by AB 2972, Chapter 1060, effective September 20, 1976, as an urgency statute. Therefore, the exemption should be allowed as stated below. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee o-o - -3 07013 T17P Butler, Louella Turner, Ruth 098-126-023-5 79049 $$1750 Williams, Helen E. R. 0. SEAT-Or Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 R:.SOLUTION NO. 76/1052 00166 h r I .Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee Jones, Carol D. 155-094-015-7 05011 !P1750 Peterson,Genevieve Peterson, Benjamin 380-080-002-5 76049 $1750 Inman, Daisy E. Nicholson, Marjorie 513-0?3-016-0 08001 $1750 Sloan, Aron & Eleanor I hereby consent to the above A FVI le—W4changes and/or corrections: . 0. BEATON JOHN / , County Counsel Assistant Assessor 1. tll/17/76 By Deputy PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. RESOLUTION NO. 76/1052 00167 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Hatter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1053 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFCRE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorised to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and laxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following assessees were erroneously not mailed homeownerts exemption claim forms. As the Assessor did not conform to Section 255.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the exemptions should be allowed. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 041-073-001- 302 T1-7-53- O'Brien, Edward J. & Emley P. 078-241-004-7 79101 $1750 Abbas, Denis L. & Darlene A. 078-070-029-0 79118 $1750 Dickerson, Merlyn L. & Joy S. R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copy to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1053 00168 Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assesses =11 -204-018-6 02013 �1750 Adams, David L. & Susan B. 125-193-048-1 79063 $1750 Van Doorn, Susan J. 166-320-030-9 79083 $1750 Callahan, Eugene A. & Doreen C. 193-491-001-7 66071 1750 Baker, James F. & Georgia E. 194-132-002-8 66059 1750 Clare, Charles J. & Camilla S. 194-151-009-9 66059 1750 Cutner, Russell H. & Della C. 199-410-025-1 66028 11750 Spencer, Melvin M. Spencer, Brian R. 2o6-151-014-1 54000 1750 Fredrickson, James G. & Cleo I. 209-273-014-8 66101 4750 Morales, Eddy J. & Christine A. 209-312-003-4 66101 $1750 Nielsen, Niel E. & Carol T. 262-033-019-7 830041750 Moore, Carl R. Jr. & Betty 262-091-020-!4. 83004 U750 Passovoy, Alexander E. & Rosalie 365-271-311-6 76003 $1750 Lesher, John M. & Lillian I. 413-042-013-8 11006 $1750 Jacques, Phillip T. 5414-071-005-0 08001 $1750 Luckey, Samuel P. & Bernadine The following assessees have been found to be eligible for the homeowner's exemption in accordance with Section 166 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The assessees have filed a notarized statement to the effect that they timely mailed a homeowner's exemption claim to the Assessor. Therefore, the exemption should be allowed as follows: Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assesses 066-372-00-T-6 01004 1750 Anderson, Barbara Johanna 08-363-011-6 07013 $1750 Hurtado, Michael & Sally 105-083-013-0 02002 1750 Shelton, Jeanette A. 110-11.90-074-9 02002 1750 Blackwell, Audrey L. 125-185-003-6 79063 $1750 Welke, Louis H. & Rose 171-011-034-5 79091 $1750 Alcorn, Dwain & Kathleen 181-342-031-4 98003 $1750 Samson, Arthur & Annie 21g-361-005-0 66101 §1750 Golomb, Richard J. & Patricia C. 376-154-009-9 76006 $1750 Martin, Charles M. & Gloria P. The following assessees were erroneously not allowed the homeowner's exemption due to failure to submit the claims to data processing. The exemptions should be allowed as follows: Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assesses 175-101-024-B 9dO29 1750 Ortland, Donald R, & Lenore Co 234-021-031-5 14002 11750 Tiedeman, Paul C. & Joanne R. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: .1. 0, SEATON JOHN B. CkUSEN' County Counsel Assistant Assessor t/11-17-76 By D PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. Deputy ,Page 2 of 2 -RESOLUTION No. 76/1053 00169 C` IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMITY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1054 of Contra Costa County ) - WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee omitted to report the cost of personal property and/or other taxable tangible property accurately to the extent that this omission and/or error caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll were the cost of the property accurately reported or had the property been accurately reported; therefore, that portion of the property which was inaccurately reported should be entered as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code together with interest on taxes pursuant to Section 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; FURTHER, Business Inventory Exemption in accordance with Section 219 of the Revenue and Taxation Code should be allowed as indicated below; and in accordance with Section 533 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against the proposed assessment for the same year. In Tax Rate Area 53017, Parcel No. 037-020-005-7, assessed to E. I. Dupont de Nemours b Co., c/o W. C. Hitt Legal Dept., 1007 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware, should have entered thereon the following corrections and/or escape assessments: Original Corrected Amount For the Assessed Assessed of R&T Year Type of Property Value Value Change Section 1972-73 Improvements $4,054,020 $4,070,625 $ 16,605 531.4; 506 Personal Property 1,817,825 1,924,935 107,110 531.4; 506 1973-74 Improvements $4,719,355 $4,727,170 $ 7,815 531.4; 506 Personal Property 2,649,570 2,825,290 175,720 531.4; 506 &Z*16�- R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1054 00170 Parcel No. 037-020-005-7 Original Corrected Amount For the Assessed Assessed of R&T Year Type of Property Value Value Change Section 1974-75 Improvements $5,067,480 $5,211,000 $ 143,520 531.4; 506 Personal Property 2,591,745 2,826,245 234,500 ' 531.4; 506 1975-76 Improvements $5,723,980 $7,722,130 +$1,998,150 531.4; .506 Personal Property 4,525,590 4,681,770 + 156,180 531.4; 506 Business Inv. Ex. 2,098,310 2,157,546 - 59,236 219 +$2,095,094 533 Assessee has been notified and has waived Statute of Limitations. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHN B. C County Coun t1j)f9 76 Assessor BY. Deputy PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1054 00171 :9 6 t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1055 of Contra Costa County )_ WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers 'in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected as stated below; and, further, in accordance with Section 4986 (a) (2) the County Auditor should be directed to cancel all or any portion of any tax, penalty, or costs on that portion in error as if it has been levied erroneously; and, if paid, a refund on that portion should be made pursuant to Section 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. For the fiscal years 1973-74, 1974-75, 1975-76, and 1976-77, in Tax Rate Area 02002, (formerly Tax Rate Area 02001 for fiscal years 1973-74 through 1975-76) , Parcel No. 110-344-004-4, assessed to Andrew J. $ Marilyn B. Friedrich, has been erroneously assessed with incorrect Improvement value due to Assessor's error in basing such value on incorrect description of total living area of property. Therefore, this assessment should be corrected as follows: Assessed Value For the Year From To 1973-74 & 1974-75 Land $2,750 $2,750 (no change) Improvements 5,000 4,625 Total T7—,M V71, 1975-76 Land $3,025 $3,025 (no change) Improvements 5,500 5,085 Total T8—,312' 8,110 1976-77 Land $3,325 $3,325 (no change) Improvements 6,050 5,600 Total 3'335S Awl"17 � R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (;:rs. Kettle) Auditor Tax Collector Page I of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1055 00172 --------------- I For the fiscal year 1976-77, the following parcels assessed to East Bay Municipal Utility District, have been erroneously enrolled with Improvement values as being taxable on the secured roll. As the improvements are owned by a public agency, such improvements should be corrected to be shown as nontaxable in accordance with State Constitution Article XIII, Section 11 (2) . Therefore, the following parcels should be corrected as follows: Tax Rate Area Parcel Number 66021 195-330-003-3 Improvements $ 9,470 - Should be nontaxable 66051 199-090-003-5 Improvements $ 6,310 - Should be nontaxable 66034 202-050-007-6 Improvements $33,980 - Should be.nontaxable 66006 202-050-008-4 Improvements $53,370 - Should be nontaxable (Note:. The land values should remain as taxable property on the secured assessment roll.) I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHNB U N, Count sel Assistant Assessor tll/19/76 By A Deputy PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1055 00173 Ia TIM BOARD OF SUPER11TSORS OF COLTMA COSTA COUTY, Si&M CF CALIFIGIR 3 Tin the :ratter of Changes } of the Assess.ant Roll } u.SSOL-JTTC:: NO. 76/1056 of Contra Costa County } •: =MAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correct-?on of erroneous assessments, said requests . having: been consented to by the County Counsel; 7,oW, THEM ORE, f3 TT RZSOL: B that the County :auditor is authorised to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-717 it has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 1831 of the California ievenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or fora and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4985 and 5u90' of the Revenue and Taxation. Code, the assessee may file a ciai= for canceration or refund; The followins boats were not—owned—by—the assessees on the lien date, and these assessments should be corrected to zero value. Original Code and Aircraft or Assessed 1.3,-,It. Ko. Assessea Boat No. Value 79035-0003 Donald Joaquin CF 7925 As $ 200 520.;4-0110 Frank =. besvi CF 1507 CS 31030 Since the situs of this aircraft has been determined to be Nevada County where it has been assessed for the 1975-77 fiscal Tear, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. 79111-A5021" arold B. ..eadAC X3475? ll�,800 Since the situs of this boat has been determined to be another state, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. 05031-0002 Albert R. =ustafson CF 7004 Fri j 510 At-l"— - As `start— 3sessor :op;es to: :assessor (: 'S. Giese} :,.:ditor _air .;oilector NO. 76/1056 Page 1 of 2 001'74 Due to incorrect information regarding the description of each of the following boats, the highest values were used in estimating assessed valuations. After receiving more detailed ir_forrmtion and upon physical e.:sninations, it has been determined that the follow=.nr correct-Ions should be *lade. Original Corrected Code and _ ssassed Assessed Assnt. No. Assessee 30st 50. Value Value 05001-0262 Gerald Valente Cl' 3083 ?3 Y1,ZU0 750 0$001-9023 Eugene A. Foung C? 2417 CC: 6 680 Y 2[0 T_ hereby consent to the above char.-es d/or corrections. R. C. 32:iM-: jOfi;: B. CL4ITS— , County Counsel assistant asessor D tll/23/76 By lje putt' PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. ?age 2 of 2 PESOLUTIO`I NO. 76/1056 00173 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA -In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESO_LUTION NO. 76/1057 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following a3sessinant3 For the Fiscal Year 1970-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Farther, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of.the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following assessees were erroneously not mailed homeowner's exemption claim forms. As the Assessor did not conform to Section 255.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the exemptions should be allowed. Parcol Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assesses 095--7234-034-7 07023 X17 0 MiF quez, Michael D. & Leonora L. 209-312-002-6 66101 1750 Porter, Robert L. & Diane P. 269-010-017-3 83004 1750 O'Brian, William L. & Marilyn M. On Parcel No. 519-240-011-6, Tax Rate Area 08001, Granter, Robert C. & Marie H., should be allowed the full exemption of $1,750. The partial exemption of $1,k00 now on the roll should be removed. R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copy to: Assessor (Mss. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOV TION NO. 76/1057 O�11'76 I, The following assessees were erroneously not allowed the homeowner's exemption due to inability to timely submit the claims to data processing. ' The exemption should be allowed as stated below. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 085-116-012-7 0702 1750 Canepa, Ignazio & Petrina 116-061-011-7 79172 1750 Recklies, Bessie M. 117-203-011-4 02001 - 11750 Phillips, George L. 132-171-004-6 02002 1750 Burnell, Larry Keith 149-291-003-7 12018 1750 Bartosh, Walter L. Leonard, Dorothy B. 212-194-005-6 66085 $1750 Jones, Kathleen D. 237-202-017-8 14002 $1750 Schlesinger, Edith 255-263-005-1 15004 $1750 Rogers, Rosa E. 510-102-010-4 08002 1750 Golden, Richard 513-383-003-3 08084 1750 Isom, Landers 514-290-016-5 08001 1750 Crocker, Edwin W. & Alice H. 571-110-008-0 85064 $1750 Leighton, Annie C. 571-312-012-8 85064 $1750 Vila, Angelina 538-181-033-1 08001 $1750 Alvarez, Maria R. Alvarez, Joseph R. The following assessees have been found to be eligible for the homeowner's exemption in accordance with Section 166 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The assessees have filed a notarized statement to the effect that they timely mailed a homeowner's exemption claim to the Assessor. Therefore, the exemption should be allowed as stated below. Parcel Number Tax Rate AreaAllele Assessee 210-320-003--7 6600_ $1750 McPhee, Douglas J. & Bessie E. 218-253-008-5 66086 $1750 Lotz, Sharon C. 270-051-010-6 83004 $1750 Wells, Herbert I hereby consent to the above charges and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Assistant Assessor t/11-23-76 By Deputy PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. Page 2 of 2 RESOLU3 ION NO. 76/1057 (1 f 0 0 1 / a , e I S t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/1058 of Contra Costa County WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee herefofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was nade within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following assessees are eligible for the homeowner's exemption in accordance with Section 253.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The claims were not allowed through clerical error. Therefore, the exemption should be allowed as stated below. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow A99983e9 007-1 0-002-3 01 17 0 Arata, Mike 051-263-003-9 01004 1750 Butler, Hershel 076-202-051-9 01002 11750 Dominguez, Manuel J. & Stella 087-063-037-3 07013 Heineman, Agnes 088-092-001-2 07013 1750 Lopez, Constance D. 088-322-006-3 07013 J1750 1750 Hestdalen, Clifford M. & Sharon R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copy to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 76/1058 Page 1 of 2 00178 E Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 09 -312-013-0 79049 17 0 McLean, Dick & Susan L. 111-122-017-2 02002 1750 Evans, Madeline Evans, Robert C. & Olive 112-182-017-7 02002 $1750 Cureton, Henry H. 119-400-001-2 13000 1750 Matheson, Robert B. & Carol L. 132-172-005-2 02002 1750 O'Connor, Gloria M. 133-076-001-6 02002 $1750 Beck, Herbert G. 149-183-008-7 12012 $1750 Clapp, Arthur J. & Margaret R. 150-170-009-8 12014 1750 Rose, Evie 164-040-032-9 79083 T1750 Eddy, Howard D. & Marion B. 166-302-015-2 12081 1750 Shockley, William J. 172-190-035-3 09047 1750 Winslow, Devon R. 178-381-019-3 98026 11750 Goff, Laurel H. 189-320-005-3 09048 1750 Mino, Lois F. 241-063-006-1 114002 1750 Schlotterbeck, Eugene F. Schlotterbeck, Digene William 360-501-003-6 06002 1750 Williams, Clinton & Gladys M. 372-305-003-9 05001 1750 Johnson, John R. Sr. 372-305-007-0 05001 1750 Frese, David Allen & Carol J. 413-110-026-7 11000 11750 Mickalson, Arthur M. & Agusta B. t 13280-019-6 11006 $1750 Byrd, Rodney Dennis & Deborah S. 14-121.003-1 08024 $1750 Palmer, Ethel A. 416-081-032-3 85099 $1750 Garrison, Jesse Lee 430-402-019-3 8500! $1750 Werkheiser, John A. 431-173-018-0 08018 $1750 Furlow, Annie R. 433-060-021-6 85127 1750 Lynch, Mark F. & Patricia E. 503-072-027-9 03000 1750 Losee, Thomas E. 516-181-002-2 08001 1750 Canepa, Paul P. & Olga M. 517-150-003-5 08001 11750 Soderblom, Gunner 527-032-002-0 08087 $1750 Howard, Ivan H. 528-060-004-9 08001 $1750 Sims, Earl L. & Evelyn V., Tre 530-220-023-2 08001 $1750 Cowell, Rosella 0. 571-110-017-1 85064 $1750 DeBrunner, Ruth C. Anderson, Janet K. FURTHER, the following assessees should be allowed the veteran's property tax exemption in accordance with Article XIII, Section 3, of the Constitution. The exemptions were not allowed due to clerical error in not submitting the claims to data processing. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assesses, 1 9-171-002-2 79091 2000 Regier, Roger V. Virginia C. 401-112-015-3 06007 1000 Hastorakos, James C. FURTHER, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 276, claimants for the disabled v91-eran'g exemption who filed a claim subsequent to April 15, 1976, should be sllow9d an exemption of the lesser of eight thousand dollars ($8,000) or 80 percent of the assessed value of the property, as stated below: On Parcel No. 087-191-008-9, Tax Rats Area 07013, ABEL M. GO?.DILLO should be allowed an exemption or -$4,000. The homeowner's exemption of $1,750 now on the roll should be removed. On Parcel No. 128-331-001-7, Tax Rats Area 02002, JAMES A. G_REaNING should be alloa9d an exemption of $5,680. The homeowner's exemption of $1,750 now on the roll should be removed. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHISEN ounty Counsel Assistant Assessor ' t/11-1-8-76 By i PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 11v Deputy Page 2 of 2 _RESOLUTION NO. 76/1058 00179 14, F IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ,CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll _ ) _RESOLUTION NO. - 76/"1059 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Boari requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests hrving been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE-SOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessorts Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date. The following claimants have been found to be eligible for the homeowner's property tax exemption in accordance with Section 218 of the Revenue and Taxation Code as amended by AB 2972, Chapter 1060, effective September 20, 1976, as an urgency statute. Because the applications were filed with the Assessor subsequent to April 15, 1976, a partial exemption of $1,400 or 80 percent of the assessed value of the property should be allowed in accordance with Section 275(c) of the Revenue and Taxation Code. A(� R. O. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1059 00180 t i F F! Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee al6-150-03z--2 10001 "Z'p4T� Gonzalez, Juan & Hortencia 017-201-014-2 10001 §1400 Deluna, Dolores 020-270-006-8 72005 14.00 Berumen, Mary 030-150-006-2 82006 $1400 Clogston, Frances J. 033-052-013-1 82052 $1400 Weatherby, John A. & Bertha M. 034-090-008-3 82056 14.00 Hoover, Harvey H. & Luda A. 035-114-010-8 82003 1400 Helms, James & Effie L. 035-151-002-9 82003 $1400 wasso, Gus M. & Maria C. 035-324-011-2 82049 $1400 Knouff, Linda A. 066-162-002-1 01004 $1400 Martinez, Luis & Olivia 066-163-001-2 01007 1400 Pereira, Antonio T. 067-151-012-1 01004 1400 Mello, Beth L. 067-328-02h-4 01002 1400 Kenney, Gladys S. 068-112-01 -4 01004 1400 Mc Farland, Marietta A. 068-152-021-9 01004. $1400 Purser, Elizabeth Pletcher, Suzanne C. 066-321-029-8 01002 $1400 Pagnini, Linda C. 071-031-017-8 01004 $1400 Clifford, Newel K. Jr. & Dolores 073-081-017-3 07013 $14.00 Lopez, Martha G. 073-096-002-8 07013 �iI400 Davidson, Fred & Irene C. 073-161-006-9 07013 $1400 Mix, M. J. Mix, Dorothy 074-211-004-2 01004 $11}00 Abono, Hannah J. 076-202-021-2 01002 $1400 Clites, Phyllis C- 085-051-024-9 07025 X1400 Dunham, Sarah F. 085-151-017-2 07025 $1400 Bruno, Annie 085-185-033-9 07013 $1400 Gardino, Mary 086-042-025-6 07013 X1400 Feliciano, Norberto & Carmen 087-051-012-0 07013 1400 Vossos, Evelyn L. 088-275-003-7 07013 1400 Vinci, Hope Diane 089-141-015-1 07013 $1400 Bruno, Jennie B. Catania, Maria R. . 095-042-030-7 79031 $1400 Pina, Delia D. 095-232-027-3 07023 1400 Rand, :Marilyn 096-016-003-4 79031 1080 Davis, Ada 096-032-008-3 79031 X1100 Casstevens, Mary 096-043-007-2 79031 $1400 Dodson, Walter & Gladys 097-071-006-7 79031 $1400 Jaurez, Benito & Angelino 097-081-022-8 79031 1400 Dusich, Fausta 098-126-015-1 79049 1400 Walls, Clinton & Liana L. 098-127-012-7 79049 $1400 Moon, Elizabeth LaVerne 105-081-006-6 02002 $1400 Lund, Mabel V. 105-084-013-9 02002 ROO 00 Van Wyk, Julie A. 110-164-001-7 02002 00 Shaffer, Gladys 110-511-034-802002 Mijares, Carolyn 111-051-006-0 02002 R-,00 :00 Knudsen, Kristian & E. Ursula 112-046-003-3 02002400 Murphy, Michael A. & Susan M. 114-191-005-7 02002 Barnes, Christella E. 115-361-008-2 02002 $1400 Sears, Chung Hi 116-061-002-6 79172 1400 Foster, Mildred J. 125-151-009-3 79063 1400 Jensen, Eva D. jb Duncan, Eva D. 125-155-002-4 79063 $1400 Campedel, Sharon E. 128-023-027-5 02002 $1400 Carlson, Rachel R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Page 2of3 00181 . . s Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 129-070-010-1 79201F— $3400 Swanson, Delmar T. & Fiar on Y.- 347-112-006-1 02002 $3.400 Van Dorn, Ann Jeanette 147-430-036-3 02002 $1400 Klug, Steven Jon & Judy K. 149-252-009-1 12052 1400 Ellerson, Charles & Frances 150-112-024-8 12058 y1400 Tanaka, Donna J. 153-102-001-2 12029 �1400 Stedman, Theresa A. 171-230-025-8 09045 _ $1400 Austin, Meg 183-142-014-4 98002 $3.400 hurdle, Dorothy % Dorantes, Dorothy 191-080-011-7 66066 $2400 Flanagan, C. Ray = Bella M. 251-100-003-2 14002 $3400 Bickerdike, Frances L. 357-198-016-2 62031 1400 Esqueda, Jess V. & Estelle P. 373-233-005-9 05001 OO Aiello, Tony 374-013-008-7 05001 $1400 Davis, Dorothy A. 380-231-010-6 76049 $3.1400 Fuller, Thomas & Bessie L. 401-161-005-0 06002 $11400 Hetzel, Sharon E. 401-272-002-7 06007 $3.400 Murray, Nora T. 405-092-013-3 85029 $3.400 Porter, William H. & Carolyn V. 408-011-017-6 08076 $2400 Galloway, Elois 409-100-014-3 85098 $1400 Watkins, Earley Marlborough, William II 409-210-005-8 85098 2400 Harris, Marjella 411-160-020-3 11017 $3400 Bassett, Lola P. 411-221-002-8 11017 $1400 Glinn, Alta May 412-290-014-7 11003 $3.400 Breuer, Mildred M. 412-333-001-3 11003 41400 Thompson, Lois E. 414-063-001-5 08024 $1400 Arriaga, Sabina 419-071-001-4 85125 X1400 Drew, Heline 508-100-003-5 08002 $21400 Dertnick, Clairinda T. 508-180-016-0 08002 $3.400 Mouton, Renola 513-061-011-5 08001 $1400 Cooley, Eddie J. & Shirley L. M. 513-072-002-1 06001 $1400 Foster, Benny Lee & Allie 513-396-045-9 08084 $1400 Johnson, Nodie A. & Mattie 513-402-029-5 08084 $1400 Ocequera, Leopold & Blanca Ocequera, Teresa 514-220-021-0 08001 $1400 Evjen, Rudolph B. & Joan M. 52J-260-012-0 08001 $1400 Hanke, Gladys V. 526-322-013-8 08087 $1400 Smith, Isabelle E. 527-011-006-6 11019 $1400 Costello, Steve ac Rosie 527-032-003-8 08087 $1400 Ferreira, John E. & Debbie W. 527-052-006-6 11017 $1400 Lawrence, Eula B. 527-092-005-0 08087 $114.00 Rahe, Maude G. 528-070-002-1 08001 $31400 Lesti, Angelo & Nancy 529-272-006-6 08001 $1400 Wolden, Eugene K. & Beverly J. 534-172-004-2 08001 y1400 Franklin, Willie & Rhodie 534-221-001-9 08001 $1400 Griffin, Lucille 534-311-001-0 08001 $2400 Robinson, Jeff & Evaline 538-4.10-008-6 08001 $1100 Collins, Ruben & Eloise 544-171-009-1 08001 $2400 Peoples, Lizzie Ola I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: JOa'1 B. County Counsel R. 0. SLATON ' Assistant Assessor By tll/23/76 Deputy PASSED by the Board on Novenber 30, 1976. 7 RESOLUTION 130. 76/1059 Page 3 of 3 00182 (i j t i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County - ]_ RESOLUTION NO. 76/1060 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests , having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; further, it has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll had the information been correctly furnished; therefore, such error on the roll should be corrected in accordance with Section 4831.5; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096 the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund; And, further, such error caused the assessor to erroneously allow business inventory exemption and, therefore, an escaped assessment in the amount of the portion of the exemption incorrectly allowed because of such erroneous or incorrect information submitted by the taxpayer should be entered pursuant to Section 531.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code together with interest on taxes pursuant to Section 506; and, in accordance with Section 533, the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against the proposed escaped assessment for the same tax year. Der Wienerschnitzel Intl. 123 Code 03000 - Assmt. No. 3755 Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value Change (R/T Code erp s Prop 7--n-a- 0- -:5 500 4831 Imps 2,660 -0- - 2,660 4831 Penalty 316 -0- - 316 R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor tll/19/76 cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of RESOLUTION NO. 76/1060 00183 Answer Man, Inc. Code 09000 - Assmt. No. 4420 Original Corrected Amount - Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value Change "(R/T Code Pers Prop - -$10's-00 4.831 Imps 9,000- 9,000 -0- Penalty 1,950 1,950 -0- R.C.A. Cotporation Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 8071 Pers Prop $ 12,280 $ -0- -$12,280 4831.5 Diamond Walnut Growers, Inc. Code 72010- Assmt. No. 3501 - Pers Prop $ 3,215 $ 3,215 $ -0- Imps. 2,325 950 - 1,375 4831.5 Jacques Couture, 924 Carl Road, Lafayette, CA 94549 Code 79041 - Assmt. No. 3515 Pers Prop $ 91090 $ 6,008 -$3,082 4831".5 Penalty 909 909 -0-- Tradeway Stores Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 2678 Imps $ 11990 $ . 1.,990 -0- Pers Prop 30,760 29,435 -$1,325 4831.5 Bus Inv Ex 14,SOS 13,960 + 545 531.5; 506 Net Change -$ 780 533 Assessee has been notified. For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 Pacific Concrete Roof Tile, Inc. Code 79041 - Assmt. No. 2002 Imps $ 9,100 $ -0- -$9,100 4831.5 Heublein, Inc. Code' 86007 - Assmt. No. 2030 Pers Prop $154,670 $151,090 -$3,580 4831.5 Bus Inv Ex 77,335 75,545 + 1,790 S31.S; S06 Net Change -$1,790 S33 Assessee has been notified. For the Fiscal Year 1974-75 Heublein, Inc. Code 86007 - Assmt. No. 2074 Pers Prop $ 55,190 $ 42,000 -$13,190 4831.5 Bus Int► Ex 27,595 21,000 + 6,595 531.5; 506 Net Change -$ 6,595 533 Assessee has been notified. R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor Page 2 of 00181 ii i �v i H M S Supply Code 02002 - Assmt. No. 3903 Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value Change '(R/T Code) Pers Prop $1' =— - bI3 . FURTHER, for the Fiscal Year 1973-74 Through a clerical error on Board Resolution No. 76/982, dated November 9, 1976, item number 4, page 2 of 3 pages, incorrect values were submitted and action should be rescinded on it; there- fore, the following corrections should be made: J. Robert Oliver Code 01002 - Assmt. No. 2008 Pers Prop $ 2,660 $ 2,240 ' 420 4831.5 Bus Inv Ex 1,197 1,008 + 189 531.5; S06 Net Change -a 231 S33 Assessee has been notified. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHN B. C SEN County Counsel Assistant Assessor BY G eputy PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 76/1060 Page 3 of 3 0018-5 °rs. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30, , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointment of Kenneth E. Danielson Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights &Measures After considering the three eligibles referred by the Civil Service Commission for the position of Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights & Measures and after reviewing the recommendation of the County Administrator, it is moved that Kenneth E. Danielson be appointed as Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights & Measures at a salary of$2674, per month effective November 30, 1976. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. - Orig. Dept: Civil Service Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agricultural Dept. Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this30th cloy of November lg 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Z" Deputy Clerk Vggij Cr 00185 H-24 3,176 15m r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Executive Session. At 10:30 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California to consider a personnel matter pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; The Board reconvened in its Chambers at 10:55 a.m. and adopted the following Board order appointing Mr. Kenneth E. Danielson as Agricultural Commissioner - Director of Weights and Measures (after which the Board proceeded with its regular agenda): a matter of record I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy oir entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors offixed this3Othday of November 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Maxine M. NeuAld OU18'7 H-24 3/76 15m w. • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Road Improvement Agreement for Land Use Permit 2121-75, Antioch Area. The Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute a Road Improvement Agreement with Louis G. Madrigal, required as a condition of approval for Land Use Permit 2121-75, Antioch area. The aforesaid agreement is accompanied by a cash bond in the amount of $4,900.00 (Deposit Permit Detail No. 141270, dated November 10, 1976). PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order vowed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Dept.: PW-LD Supervisors affixed this 30tbday of November 19 76 cc: Recorder (via P.W.) Public Works Director Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Assessor By ����-�c�, , Deputy Clerk Louis G. Madrigal N. Pous P.O. Box 681 Antioch, CA 94509 H-24 3/76 I'm 00188 t ROAD IMPROVE+;ENT AGREE,\7 (§1) Development (?IS,LUP,etc.): Land Use Permit 2 -75 ( Antioch Area) ( 1) Developer:• i - j 2) Effective Date: ove er , 1975 (§2) Completion Period: One Year (§4) Deposit: (cash) $4,900.00 1. PARTIES $ DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called-"County", and the above-named Developer, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this road acceptance: 2. IMPROVEMENTS. Developer shall construct, install and complete road and street improvements, storm drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title-9 and including- future amend- ments, and all improvements required in the approved improvement plan of.this road acceptance on file in the County's Public Korks Department entitled Pittsburg-Anticoh Highway Curb Grades Developer shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work") within the above completion period from date hereof, in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance- Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GUARANTEE $ 21MINTE'IANCE. Developer guarantees that the work is and will be free from defects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance with subdivision require- mehts of County Ordinance Code Article 94-4.4; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMPROVEN07 SECURITY: DEPOSIT 6 EO\DS. Upon executing this Agreement, Developer shall deposit as security with the County: Cash: 5500 cash; together with S $4,400.00 as additional security guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agreement; and securing pa%ment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Developer. S. INSPECTION FEE. Developer shall pay to the County a cash amount equal to five percent (Sb) of the estimated cost of the improvements for the inspection of the work and the checking and testing of the materials. 6. {tkRR.k`TY. Developer warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's resolution of completion for the road acceptance, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Developer shall r-ake changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. . 7. NO h:AIVER BY COU\TY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of wort; and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or parents therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Developer of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to cor..ply with any of the terms and conditions hereof., Microfilmed with board order _ 1 _ 001.89 M p I' } 12. CONSIDERATION. In consideration hereof, County shall, at such time as the improvements are constructed to County standards and are in conformance with said plans i on file in the Public .Cor',:s Department, subject to inspection and approval of the Public Works Director, accept the public street improvements for maintenance. CONTM COSTA COUNTY_ DEVELOPER: (see note below) a VERNON L. CLINE Public rks D' ecto� / D ( esignate • ficial capacity in the business) ✓Deputy • --- . - Note to Developer: (1) Execute acknowledgment form below; and (2) if a corporation, affix RECO,L\IENDED FOR�IPPROVAL: corporate seal. Ass•stant Public •lorks Director (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOIN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel ByQ.-L, • Deputy U State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of ('T, ( � ) ss" or Individual) On - <;r /,q 7 G the person(j9) whose name(,$) is/a*e signed above for Developer and who is knoim to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instrument, _ersonally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation, or partnership names above executed it. OFFICIAL SEAL UO (NOTARIAV SF--XL).: C'. - :5:, ._ :�' 0 / /l ' Notary Public for said County and State' __--(LD-44B, Rev. 9/75) -3- 00190 a , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 . 19 76 In the Molter of Authorization to temporarily close Minnesota Avenue, Brentwood area On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS.BY ME BOARD ORDEPM that the Public Works Director is AUIMR= to temporarily close Minnesota Avenue (Road No. 8063) south of Randy Way, Brentwood area, from December 6, 1976 thriogg i Deceaber 10, 1976, to repair the bridge over Sand'Cree3c. 7baffic shall be routed via Fairview Avenue and Dainty Avenue. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public i•:orks Departapnt Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Maintenance Division Supervisors cc: Public Vkn*s Director affixed this 30thday of November , 19 76 } Maintenance Division J. R. OISSON, Clerk By � � �..✓ Deputy Clerk can L. Miller H-24 3r..6 15m 00191 i" In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 . 1976 In the Matter of Approving and Authorizing Payment for Property Acquisitions. Project No. 4371-4283-663-76 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlements and Right of Way Contracts for Port Chicago Highway Bridge are APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said Contracts and the Temporary ' Construction Permits on behalf of the County: Payee and Grantor Contract Date Escrow Number Amount Central Contra Costa November 4, 1976 First California Title $390.00 Sanitary District Co., Escrow No. 82920 Mathew W. Gonsalves, November 3, 1976 Mathew W. Gonsalves $ 32.00 et al Marlene M. Gonsalves William Gonsalves Marian Gonsalves John M. Gonsalves Charlene Gonsalves Gerald E. Santucci Inez Santucci Raymond P. Santucci Helen Santucci The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw warrants in the amounts specified to be delivered to the County Principal Real Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was PASSED on November 30, 1976. i 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors affixed this30thdoy of November 19 cc: Public Works Department 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk een Miler H-24 3176!Sm 00192 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 . 19 76 In the Matter of Acceptance of Offer of Dedication for Recording Only. (Work Order 8205-2505) San Ramon Creek. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Offer of Dedication, dated November 10, 1976, from Luciano Queirolo and Silvio Queirolo for a storm drainage easement along San Ramon Creek, required as a condition of approval of Development Permit 3008-76, is ACCEPTED for recording only. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forogobw h a true and correct copy of an order e-!a on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Dept.: PW-Real Property Supervisors affixed this 30thday of_November . 1q 76 cc: Public Works Recorder (via P.W.) Director of Planning OLSSON, Clerk Flood Control ey Deputy Clerk can L. Mill H-24 3/76 15n 00193 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 'ovemher 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Exoneration of Surety Tax Bond on Tract No. 4843, City of Walnut Creek. The County Tax Collector having advised that all taxes on the property included in Tract No. 4643, City of Walnut Creek, have been paid in full; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Surety Tax Bond No. 7205457 issued by The American Insurance Company is EXONERATED. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Tax Collector 1N'nness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affbwd this30th day of 17ovember . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By .✓ _ . Deputy Clerk Robbie errez H-24 3176 15m 00194 i i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.. State of California November ,30 , 197.E- In the Matter of - Complaint with respect to Alleged Problems Resulting from Reconstruction of Livorna Road, Alamo Area. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having brought to the attention of the Board a November 21, 1976 letter he had received from Mr. Gordon Sparrowe, 1313 Laverock Lane, Alamo, California 94507 alleging that construction work performed in the vicinity of Laverock Lane and Livorna Road created grading and drainage problems, and requesting that conditions be corrected; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid complaint is REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and report or corrective action. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. Gordon Sparrowe Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors affixed this_jQjhday of November 19'L6 r J. R. OLSSON, Clerk � " n By j"u- -�) I&L ,!'� X61 , Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H-24 3/76 ISm 00195 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 . 19 2jL In the Matter of Hearing on the Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the Saranap Area be Rezoned (2036—R7.). This being the time fixed for hearing on the . recommendation of the Planning Commission that property fronting. in two sections, approximately 80 feet and approximately 140 feet on the west side of Bont Lane, south of Mt. Diablo Boulevard and north-of State Freeway 680, 'Ualnut Creek area, be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District-1 W-1) to Retail Business District (R—B); and No one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning having advised that a negative declaration was filed for this proposal; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ordinance Number 76-88 giving effect to the aforesaid rezoning is INTRODUCED, reading waived and December 7, 1976 is set for adoption of same. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. _ cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Assessor Supervisors affixed this30thday of November . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-24 3/76 15m 00193 '1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California tinvember in , 19 7A In the Matter of Hearing on the Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the San Ramon Area be Rezoned. (2034—R,7). This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission that property fronting approximately 300 feet on the south side of Thor-up Lane, approximately 800 feet west of State Freeway 680, San Ramon area, be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District-1 to Retail Business District (R—B); and No one having appeared in opposition; and I•tr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that a negative declaration was filed for this proposal; and The Board having consi,dered. the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ordinance Plumber 76-89 giving effect to the aforesaid rezoning is INTRODUCED, reading waived and December 7, 1976 is set for adoption of same. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. - - Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director of Planning Supervisors County =ssessor affixed this3Cthday of i:ovember . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk C-. . Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-24 3/76 1 U 00191 k,� ka y l. i r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Novembe- 10 . 19 7A In the Matter of Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land in the Bethel Island Area (2352—RZ) be Rezoned. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends the rezoning of certain land fronting approximately 1,050 feet on the north side of Gateway Road, approximately 2,000 feet west of Piper Road, Bethel Island area, from Multiple Famil}� Residential District (hi—R) to Mobile Home Park District (T-1 ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 28, 1976 at 10:35 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the ANTIOCH DAILY LEDGER. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: List of ?lames Provided Supervisors by Planning of i;xed thisYthday of i ove:iber . 19 76 Director of Planning — —�� �_.R.(OISSON, Clerk ` C w e, k�Deputy Clerk Ronda :r..dahl H-24 3/:6 ISm 00198 e A RECEIVE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT W OV lT 1q'6 J. it assay . MU BOARD OF SUPzTP Rs cowrw; A CO• BY.- •- .De«+w TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 10 November 1976 Attn_ Clerk of the Boa d i FROM: Anthony A. Dehoes ' SUBJECT:REZONING: Commission Initiated Director of Planni Study (2052-RZ) - 21 Acres, M-R to T-I, / Bethel Island Area (S.D. V) Attached is Planning Com ission Resolution 177-1976, adopted by the Commission on Tuesday, 9 November 1976, by a vote of 6 AYES - I ABSENT (Richard J. Jeho). This study was reviewed by the Commission on Tuesday, 26 October 1976, and was approved for change from M-R to T-1 by a vote of 6 AYES - 1 ABSENT (Richard J. J d,a). Subject property fronts approximately 1,050-ft., on the north side of Gateway Rood, approx., 2,000-ft., west of Piper Rood, in the Bethel Island Area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: John J. & Isabel M. Ferreira Manuel & Irene Boeto 3181 Gateway Road 2041 - 87th Avenue Bethel Island, Calif. 94511 Oakland, Calif. 94621 Wm. C. & Roberta B. Lawson Edward M. Conner 3393 Gateway Rood 853 Los Trompos Road Bethel Island, Calif. 94511 Lafayette, Calif. 94549 Mr. Stanley M. Harris Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland 3505 Gateway Road 2900 Lakdshore Avenue Bethel Island, Calif. 94511 Oakland, Calif. 94610 Bethel Baptist Chapel L. E. Weisenburg, Jr. 3725 Gateway Road 29 Sorrento Way Bethel Island, Calif. San Rafael, Calif. 94901 AAD/v Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, Neg.EIR, Minutes. cc: File 2052-RZ Supervisors, District I, I I, I I I, I V, V. M1croii4meu board order 00199 r_ r. y. ..^:'Pan ....... uan ..�., _ ... w . , . ,.,., _v,� ,:..:, ._a: ,�_. _ . . .,,. � - sir.,,; •, RESOLUTION NO. 77-1976 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATION STUDY (2052-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE BETHEL ISLAND AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 20, 1976, the Planning Commission, after having been duly briefed by the Planning Staff, instructed the Planning Staff to initiate rezoning hearings for possible change in the existing zoning from Multiple Family Residential District (M-R) to a more appropriate zoning classification; and WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was held on Tuesday, October 26, 1976, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, no one appeared to be heard on this matter at the October 26, 1976 public hearing; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on this matter on July 7, 1976; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that their Initiated Study (2052- RZ), to rezone 21 acres from Multiple Family Residential District (M-R) to Mobile Home Park District (T-1), be APPROVED, as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE BOULDIN DIVISION, SECTOR 7 AND THE DISTRICTS MAP FOR THE BETHEL ISLAND AREA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INSERT MAP NO. 31, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is as follows: (1) Rezoning of the subject property from Multiple Family Residential District (M-R) to Mobile Home Park District (T-1) would reflect the existing land use in conformance with the General Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and the Secretary of this Planning Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver 00200 Mkrol'itmed with board order Resolution No. 77-1976 the some to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California, The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 26, 1976, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Anderson, Walton, Compaglia, Young, Stoddard, Milano. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Richard J. Jeho. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. 1, William L. Milano, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 9, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: Commissioners -Compagl io, Stoddard, Young, Anderson, Walton, Milano. NOES: Commissioners -None. ABSENT: Commissioners -Richard J. Jeha. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. Chairman of the Plan Ing Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: RECEIVED Secretary of the Plainning Commission-of the County of-CI ntra Costa, State of California `I / CUM BOARD OF SUKRVISORS CONTRF� TA CO. ey .._lis:.+inL.—Deputy -2- 0020��l;uafi�med • •� t t 1 vita board Order U �4 � '/ , r ' , r •Jr , w' rr ,�' � r rr / BETHEL - TRACT/ , ' I" =800' ,A3 ' r ACT 2 ` � r r , 1k2 WK.. � Rezone / $ / From A4P-1 To r- 1, i, A_ 14- r!2046- , Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy ofA RjuviNr" I-O VNs-Gni .,.t. is r:-s > (—ONWA G,iju-m tuFlc?Hila- jnSUT ttiAP Ria 31 indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of PLAtjAili•IG 04141-MON /1Jljl4i D - 205"?. QZ Chairman of the ContP6 Costa County Planning Commission, State of Calif. ATTEST ^ f 00202 Secretary of the Contra Costa Couhty Planning Commission, State of Calif. Findings Map M►croiiimea with board ocder CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPART61M NOTICE OF C�Completion of Environmental Impact Report -- Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2024 Phone EIR•Contact Person M.Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY County File #2052-RZ: To consider whether approximately 21.9 acres should be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Mobile Home Park District (T-1). Subject property fronts on the north side of Gateway Road west of Piper Road, in the Bethel Island area. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the project site is an already existing mobile home park which will not be changed or expanded as a result of the proposed rezoning,which will reflect this existing use. It is determined from initial study by M.Coulter of the XX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine li Escobar Streets Martinez, California C ' n to post `�lVt-v `� Final date for review/appeal `-'��-� 2�l 191(,B 00203 P ning Dep a Representative .arra;.4M d with board order e, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Recommendation of the Planning Cominission that Land in the Oakley Area (2C5" RZ.) be Rezoned. The Director of Planning having notified this-Board that the Planning Commission recommends the rezoning of certain land fronting approximately 4CO feet on the south side of State Highway =,"4 and 40C- feet on the west side of 33FT Road, Oakley area, from Multiple Family Residential District (I'VI-1) to Multiple Family Residential District'. (1:--2); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 28, 1976 at 10:35 a.m. .in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in Aj;TTOCH DAILY LEDGER. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: List of "a-mes Provided Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of by Plann;ngr Supervisors Director o.:. PlanninZ affixed thisToday ofI9?„ .--,R- OLSSON, Clerk r y- InL rt[t, Deputy Clerk Aonda Amdahl H-24 31'.6 15w 00204 RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT t�0�//" I9lo" ,. R. o:sso.J CLT' K BOARD of SUn;r� 2S ca.,•�;C co. TO. Board of Supervisors DATE: 10 Novemb B -= ..oca Attn: Clerk of the Board FROM: Anthony A. Dehoes , SUBJECT: REZONING: Commission Initiated Director of Plannin Study (2051-RZ) - 4.5 Acres, M-1 to M-2, Oakley Area - (S.D. V) Attached is Planning Commissi solution 176-1976, adopted by the Commission on Tuesday, 9 November 1976, by a vote of 6 AYES - I ABSENT (Richard J. Jeha). This study was reviewed by the Commission on Tuesday, 26 October 1976, and was approved for a change from M-1 to M-2 by a vote of 6 AYES - I ABSENT (Richard J. Jeho). Subject property tronts approximately 4004t., on the south side of State Highway 14 and 1' 400-ft., on the west side of 33FT Road, in the Oakley Area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Mr. Harry W. Tassell 3105 Windsor Drive Antioch, Calif. 94509 Mr. Burton Turner 1002 Grayson Road Pleasant Hill, Calif. 94523 AAD/v Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, Neg.EIR, Minutes. cc: File 2051-RZ Supervisors, District I, 11, I I I, I V, V. fvkcro;i�rnzd �,itn board order 00205 i� a RESOLUTION NO. 76-1976 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY (2051-RZ), 1N THE ORDINANCE CODE SEC- TION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE OAKLEY AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 20, 1976, the Planning Commission, after having been duly briefed by the Planning Staff, instructed the Planning Staff to intiate rezoning hearings for possible changes in the existing zoning from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to a more appropriate zoning classification; and WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was held on Tuesday, Oct- ober 26, 1976, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, two persons did appear on this matter and were duly heard by the Planning Commission at the October 26, 1976, public hearing; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on this matter on July 19, 1976; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that their Initiated Study (2051-RZ), to rezone 4.5 acres from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Multiple Family Residential District (M-2) be APPROVED, as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE DISTRICTS MAP FOR THE OAKLEY AREA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INSERT MAP NO. 30, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is as follows: (1) The multiple family residential designation of the East County General Plan is for a lessor density than the M-2 Districts allow; however, rezoning to M-2 at this time is consistent with the adjacent M-2 zoning. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Planning Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the some to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion 00206 board 01-J31tJl :..ro{i; , �fi1t1 ' tJli;ro;i;Gn3:. �fitn board Resolution No. 76-1976 of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 26, 1976, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Anderson, Walton, Compaglia, Young, Stoddard, Milano. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Richard J. Jeha. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, William L. Milano, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 9, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: Commissioners -Compaglia, Stoddard, Young, Anderson, . Walton, Milano. NOES: Commissioners -None. ABSENT: Commissioners -Richard J. Jeho. ABSTAIN: Commissioners -None. r Chairman of the Plan ng Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: t FRECEI�TED Secretary'of e P1,nLningQmissi_on_oFiFe_ ---'County of Contra Costa, State of California N`_3V/0' .5��CoNrRr jcSTAco. 6v__...src 00207 -2- CJ._i 1l O!"-T YN 0 0 1" =200' 0 In STATE ;_`'�v�::�:"C'-+`' .uSji'is`ii:..•'-.�:::: } Rezone µ , From W-/ To j . . }F O ...... I. A. H. Young , Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A portion of the districts map for the Oakley area Contra Costa County, California, insert map no 30 indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of Planning Commission initiated '2051 RZ Chairman of the Contra ossa County Planning Commission, tote of Calif. ATTES "' ^ 4 . _ ' /J � 002Q8 Secrktory of thq Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of Calif. Findings Map MIC[ ur . rd order r, f�_r . • • II CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 9S1 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2024 Phone EIR Contact Person M.Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY County File 12051-RZ: To consider whether approx. 6.48 acres should be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Single Family Residential District (R-6). Subject property fronts on the south side of State Highway 4, east of Empire Avenue, in the Oakley area. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because: Rezoning of the land to a lesser density would have less of an impact on the environment and would be consistent with the General Plan designation for the area. It is determined from initial study by M.Coulter of the XX Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached, The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine 6 Escobar Streets Martinez, California Da a Posted JuLv �y�(p Final date for review/appeal �oa� 2 n. By � 00209 Planning Departm nt Representative Miaofiirzac! %r;,n board cyder - Ats I r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NoypMbpr In ' 19 2& In the Matter of - RecouLmendation of the Planning Commission that Lard in the Antioch Area (2050-3Z) be Rezoned. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends the rezoning of certain land fronting approximately 600 feet on the south side of 10th Street and 600 feet on the north side of the Southern Pacific Rail Road Tracks, Antioch area, from =ultiple Family Residential District ( :—il to Forestry Recreational District IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDE3=+D that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 23, 1976 at 10:3G a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 1C7, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by lay: in the AITIOCH DAILY LEDGER. PASSED by the Board on-Vovember 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: List of ;:ar..es Provided Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of by Planning Supervisors Director of rlan::_np affixed this3! ..day of :ovember 19 76 J.`R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk RAda H-24 3j76 15m 00210 4'+ i I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FI0V/-' 1976 J. R. OLMON QERK BOARD OF SUP-RVIS023 :�fONTRx A CO. TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 10 November pJ°' Attn: Clerk of the Board FROM: Anthony A, Des SUBJECT: REZONING: Commission Initiated Director of Planni Study (2050-RZ) - 30 Acres, M-1 to F-R, AntiochArea (S.D. V) Attached is Planning CommLm4esolution 175-1976, adopted bythe Commission on Tuesday, 9 November 1976, by a vote of 6 AYES - I ABSENT (Richard J. Jeho). This study was reviewed by the Commission on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, and was approved for a change from M-1 to F-R by o vote of 7 AYES (All members being present). -Subject property fronts approximately 600-ft., on the south side of 10th Street and 6004t., on the north side of the Southern Pacific Rail Road Tracks, Antioch Area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Mr. & Mrs. Wm. L. Stansbury 1432 - 10th Street Antioch, California 94509 Valley Investments c% Fryborger & Van Hofwogen 2975 Treat Boulevard Concord, Calif. 94518 Geo. P. & Veronica Cardinale Route 11, Box 123-K Oakley, Calif. 94561 Fred & Alice Lorenzetti Rt. 02, Box 396-AA Oakley, Calif. 94561 AAD/v Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, NEG.EIR, Minutes. cc: File 2050-RZ Supervisors, District: 1 , i l , 1 11, I V, V. .::ri board order 00211 4 I RESOLUTION NO . 75-1976 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY (2050-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SEC- TION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE ANTIOCH AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 20, 1976, the Planning Commission, after having been duly briefed by the Planning Staff, instructed the Planning Staff to initiate rezoning hearings for possible change in the existing zoning from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to a more appropriate zoning classification; and WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was held on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, no one appeared to be heard on this matter at the October 12, 1976, public hearing; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on this matter on July 7, 1976; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that their Initiated Study (2050-RZ), be APPROVED, as to a change from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Forestry Recreational District (F-R), as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE DISTRICTS MAP FOR THE WEST ANTIOCH AREA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, INSERT MAP NO. 29, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is as follows: (1) This parcel is part of the fairgrounds; it is most appropriate that it be zoned to be consistent with the remaining section of the fairgrounds, which is F-R. This piece of property currently has a non-taxable status consistent with the General Plan designation as public and semi-public F-R Zoning is in conformance with the General Plan desigra tion. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Planning Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the some to 00212 Mir-,aii;mad wdh board order Resolution No. 75-1976 the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Anderson, Jeha, Stoddard, Young, Compaglia, Walton, Milano. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, William L. Milano, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 9, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: Commissioners -Compaglia, Stoddard, Young, Anderson, Walton, Milano. NOES: Commissioners -None. ABSENT: Commissioners -Richard, J. Jeha. ABSTAIN: Commissioners -None. Chairman of the Plan ng Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Secretaryot:the Planning Commission of the RECEIVED --County of Contra Costa, State of California V CUR.<8OA20 O:x1PE'r/ 8v.7C�Osrq Co. ci 2- 00213 ............ ....1 vYrL� ....1(CG J(G8i 9 C / � C I T Y OF • Aft T 1 0 C H a00�� ..o• trk r �r.�r' Itf C� �� z 1 • � s.ntr I •+ r�` / r 1, A. H. Young , Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A portion of the districts map for the West Antioch area, Contra Costa County, California Insert map no. 29 indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of Planning Commission initiated ;:2050 RZ Chairman of the Ca6tro Costa County Planning Commission, State of Calif. ATTEST 00214 -Secretgr of the/aon ra Costa 'ounty Planning Commission, State of Calif. Findings Map t I w t w• CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARDIENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report < XX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Dlartinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2024 , Phone EIR Contact Person M.Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY County File #2050-RZ: To consider whether approximately 30 acres should be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Forestry Recreational District (F-R). Subject property fronts on the south side of 10th Street and on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks,west of L Street,and surrounded by the City of Antioch,in the Antioch area. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because the. project site is part of the County Fairgrounds (owned by the 23rd District Agricultural Association not taxed) and zoning will reflect existing use. No physical impacts are anticipated because of the lack of change in actual land use and the previously altered condition of the property. It is determined from initial study by M.Coulter of the X371Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. oJustification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Ding, Administration Bldg. Pine F Escobar Streets JAlartinez, California (- i` n r7 Dat Post Ul.-v, V � "' Final date for review/appeal U�-v L1, MIG By 00215 Planning Departmen Re resentative In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Novpmber 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Recommendation of the Planning Commission that Land it the Concord Area (2044—?2) be Rezoned. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commision recommends the rezoning of certain land fronting 400 feet on the south side of Rosenthal Avenue and approximately ECO feet on the north side of Arnold Industrial Highway, Concord area, from ;Multiple Family Residential District (1'4—I) to Light Industrial District (L—I); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, December 28, 197E at 10:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 167, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, I'artinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by lay: in the C01 CORD DAILY TRANSCRIPT. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: List of Na^es Provided Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of by PlarnirF, Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this3"thdoy of November 19 7F, _... J. (R. OLSSON, Clerk rk , ,a \,(, Deputy Clerk 'n"'onda Amdahl H-24 3j76 15m 00215% J S� RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT N O V 0;550 aE;m 90ax3 00 su7;)E,?v so Oa.. QSiA CO. TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: 10 November 1976 Attn: Clerk of the Board FROM: Anthony A. Dehoes SUBJECT: REZONING: Planning Commission Director of Planni Initiated Study (2044-RZ) - 4,1 Acres, M-1 to L-1 - Concord Area. (S.D. IV) 1 . Attached is Planning Com fission Resolution No. 74-1976, adopted by the Commission on Tuesday, November 9, 1976, by a vote of 6 AYES - I ABSENT (Richard J. Jeho), This study was reviewed by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, and was approved for change from M-1 to L-I by a vote of 6 AYES - I N O E (Albert R. Compagl ia), Subject property fronts 400-ft., on the south side of Rosenthal Avenue and approx., 600-ft,, on the north side of Arnold Industrial Highway, in the Concord Area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Memory Gardens of Co.Co., Inc. 2011 Arnold Industrial Highway Concord, California 94520 Mr. & Mrs. J. Erman Otto 2101 Arnold Industrial Highway Concord, California 94520 James L. & Pamela A. Warren 2151 Arnold Industrial Highway Concord, California 94520 AAD/v cc: File 2044-RZ Supervisors, District: I, I I, 111, IV. V. Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, Neg.Dec.,EIR, Minutes. NiXro;ilmad v/ah board order 00217 rJ RESOLUTION NO.74-1976 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY (2044-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SEC- TION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE CONCORD AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on Tuesday, April 20, 1976, the Planning Commission, after having been duly briefed by the Planning Staff, instructed the Planning Staff to initiate rezoning hearings for possible changes in the existing zoning from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Light Industrial District (L-1) or other appropriate zoning classification; and WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, a public hearing was held on Tues- day, October 12, 1976, whereat all persons interested therein might appeor and be heard; and WHEREAS, no one appeared to be heard on this matter at the October 12, 1976 meeting; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on July 19, 1976; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that their Initiated Study (2044- RZ) be APPROVED as to a change from Multiple Family Residential District (M-1) to Light Industrial District (L-1), as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE DISTRICTS MAP FOR THE AVON AREA, INSERT MAP NO.50, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reason for this recommendation is as follows: (1) Rezoning of the subject property from M-1 to L-I would serve to implement the General Plan. The proximity of the cemetery will support existing residential uses while the property is in transition to a more industrial area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Planning Commission shall respectively sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and 00218 Micro;drnad wiih bird order Resolution No. 74- 1976 deliver the some to the Board of Supervisors oil in accordance with the Planning Laws of the State of California. The instruc#ion by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Jeha, Walton, Anderson, Young, Stoddard, Milano. NOES: Commissioners -Albert A. Compagl ia. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. 1, William L. Milano, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, November 9, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regulary passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: Commissioners - Compogl ia, Stoddard, Young, Anderson, Walton, Milano. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Richard J. Jeho. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. Chairman of the Fla ping Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: RECEIVED Se"etaZiof the Planning`Commission of the �nty of Contra Costa, State of California i,;11 I. R. 0:5SC.'3 CLERK 6CAiD Cr :.U'Z,15OZ5 ,40 iRA COSTA Co. -2- 00219 'i board order .............M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .�_ all 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I _I. 1--� �.► 1 n80O, ,r � 1 1 11I�.! I11 � 11111. r ,.�.. CI Rezone From M-1 TOL-1 � Q 1111111 � 111 CITY a= ' CONCORD / 1, A. H. Young , Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A portion of the districts map for the Avon area, insert map no. 50, Contra Costa County, California indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of Planning Commission initiated 12044 RZ Chairman of the Conlfci Costa Planning Commission, State of Calif. ATTES 0220 Secrgta of theontra Costa unty —(Planning Commi ion, State of Calif. Findings Map Microwr ,iar, 77in board order i1 a F, A' Yt . �T' qtr CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance _Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2024 Phone EIR Contact Person M.Coulter Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PLANNING COMMISSION INITIATED STUDY County File 1f2044-RZ: To consider whether approx. 4.1 acres should be rezoned from Multiple Family Residential District (.1A-1) to Light Industrial District (L-I). Subject property fronts on the south side of Rosenthal Avenue on the north side of Arnold Industrial Highway,northwest of State Freeway 24,in the Concord area. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because: This area is designated as industrial by the General Plan and is surrounded both by this type of use and by more open space uses. The cemetery will serve to buffer existing residential use while this area is in transition to a more industrial area. No adverse physical impacts are anticipated. It is determined from initial study by M.Coulter of the XX planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine $ Escobar Streets i Martinez, California D to Post JU i9 KNIG Final date for review/appeal � )�' 2 I9�(o B -� 00221 Planning Depart en Representative Microfilmed tivitl: `.-oord order iI In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 1976 In the matter of Appeal of Ms. Shirley Calhoun fro Dismissal of her Request for Evidentiary Hearing on Overpayment of General Assistance Benefits. The appeal of Ms. Shirley Calhoun from a decision of the Appeals and Complaints Division of the Social Service Department * dismissing her request for an evidentiary hearing to appeal a demand for repayment of an overpayment of General Assistance funds having come on for hearing; the parties having agreed that there were no disputed facts but that the Board was being asked to make a policy decision; Mr. Ralph L. Pollard, Appeals and Complaints Coordinator, having advised the Board that Ms. Calhoun's request for an evidentiary hearing was not filed within 90 days from the date of the Notice of Action as required by uni- form procedures set forth in Board Resolution No. 74/365 (Section 22-300 of the Social Service Department Manual); Ms. Deborah Miller, representing Ms. Calhoun, having stated that the hearing request,was not filed in a timely manner due to a misunderstanding between the appellant and a law clerk in the Welfare Unit of Berkeley Neighborhood Legal Services as to who would file the request; Ms. Miller having further stated that the emotional condition of her client is such that an adverse decision would have a deleterious effect, and therefore having requested that the Board grant a waiver to permit an evidentiary hearing to be held (pursuant to Item 5 of Board Resolution No. 75/28); and The Board having discussed the circumstances leading to the aforesaid dismissal; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having noted that the only issue to be de6ided was whether the confusion in filing the appeal was sufficient to grant a time waiver; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed the opinion that granting a waiver in this case would establish a precedent, recom- mended that the request be denied; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Moriarty is approved, and the appeal is denied. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Boord of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Ms. Shirley Calhoun Supervisors Ms. Deborah Miller affixed this 30th day of November, 19 76 Director, H.R.A. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Social Service Dept., Attn: Mr. R. Pollard By I'A,!L—, Deputy Clerk County Counsel T.Teanne O. Maglio .y "24 s0ountip Administrator 6,293 EBH*.s ' t l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 1976 In the Matter of Proposed Countywide Study of Septage Problems. The Board having received a November 18, 1976 letter from Mr. James A. Robertson, Executive Officer, California Regional Water Quality Control Board--Central Dalley Region, transmitting an outline of the suggested scope of a countywide study of its septage problems, and requesting written comments thereon before December 10, 1976; and Mr. Robertson having advised that said study of this county's septage problems will be placed on the California Regional Water Quality Control Board's Clean dater Grant Priority hist to be considered for adoption on December 17, 1976 thereby providing an opportunity for state and federal funding of 87j percent of the cost of the study; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the County Health'Officer and the Public Works Director (Environmental Control). PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. cc• County Health Officer Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public forks Director Supervisors Environmental Control affixed this 30thday of November 19 76 Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator ( / J. R. OLSSON. Clerk By Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H-24 3/776 ISm 00223 i i t7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing the Transfer of Park Dedication Funds to County Service Area R-8 The Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee and The Director of Planning having recommended that $151,541.50 be transferred from Park Dedication Trust Fund to County Service Area R-8 for the acquisition of 3.74 acres for a neighborhood park in the Walnut Creek area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that recommendation is APPROVED and County Auditor-Controller is authorized to transfer said monies. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on 1he date aforesaid. Orig.: Planning Department WitnessWitnessmy hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Director of Planning affixed thiti0th day of_November 1976 (Park $ Rec. Fac. Adv. Cte., Attn. D. Fransen) County Auditor-Controller >> J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director B_ Deputy Clerk Attn: J. Fears Bdaxin=h1.Neu eta County Administrator 00224 H-24 3/7615m in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 . 19 76 In the Matter of Riverview Fire Protection District Proposed Acquisition of Property The County Administrator having this day submitted to the Board a request from Fred L. Golinveaux, Chief, Riverview Fire Protection District, for approval to acquire 12 acres of surplus state property for construction of a central fire station, an administration building and a training center; On the recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to its Administration and Finance Committee for review and report. Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Oriq: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Riverview Fire Supervisors Protection District affixed this10th day of :IoveTber 19 76 Board Committee Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk J By YJ7,-ZA i itLLt Deputy Clerk IRa Cram 00225 H.24 3/76 Ism �.j In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Social Service Funding Problems. Mr. A. G. Will, County Administrator, having this day submitted to the Board a November 23, 1976 memorandum from Mr. C. L. Van Marter, Director, Human Resources Agency, relating to social services funding problems: and Ms. Mary Lou Laubscher, Chairman, Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee, and Mr. Richard Cabral, representing Social Services Union Local 535, having appeared and urged that the Board take no further cutback action in the Social Service Department during the 1976-1977 fiscal year; and 11r. Will having Informed the Board that the County will probably be receiving a supplementary allocation of Title XX Social Service funds In the amount of approximately $725,000 and that in addition the County will be receiving about $1,750,000 in Federal Countercyclical Act funds; and The Board members having discussed the matter, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the report of Mr. Van Marter is ACKNOWLEDGED and same is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors 11. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) for review, taking Into account all circumstances including those cited above. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ms. Laubscher Supervisors Mr. Cabral affixed this30th day of November 19 76 Director, Human Resources Agency J R. OLSSON, Clerk County Welfare Director County Administrator By Deputy Clerk Cr ti-24 1 Sm 00221S Human Reso ,- -ces Agenc �- �, y Date November 23, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Arthur G. Will To County Administrator Contra Costa County RECEIVED From C. L. Van Marter, Director HOV A. 1915 D OEiice of Subj SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING PROBLEMS NOV 130o 1976 County Administrator IL CaK Bow or su?MtsoRs On November 9, 7976 the Board of ffi%lgdp ti initiate such further actions as are required t Tully e ,4 million deficit considered earlier this year. The Board has already held numerous public hearings on this deficit and has otheniise given full consideration to this matter. This report identifies the assumptions being made at this time in regard to the deficit and the actions which the Board must take to complete elimination of the $1.4 million deficit. I recommend that-you forward this report to the Board of Supervisors on November 30 for whatever action they deem appropriate. ASSUMPTIONS: A. I am assuming that the Title XX claims for the first quarter of this fiscal year represent 23% of the Title XX claims for the entire year. This assumption is of critical importance in determining how much of the deficit remains to be eliminated. If 23% is correct, the remaining deficit is $700,000. If the first quarter claim represents as much as 24% of the full year's claims, the deficit is only $250,000. Such factors as the-balance between eligibility workers and social workers, the point in time when EW staff starts being hired again, when charges from other departments are made to the Social Service Department, the level of over- head costs for the remainder of the year, and numerous other factors influence this percentage. From past experience, the first quarter's claim is always the lowest of the year. In past years, the first quarter's claim has ranged from 22% to slightly over 24%. I believe it would be appropriate to use 23% in order to insure that the reductions made are adequate to totally eliminate the $1.4 million deficit and have used the 23% figure in my recommendations. B. I am assuming the Board does not wish to apply any of the Title II Public Works Employment Act money to this deficit. There will, of course, probably be another deficit next year and there is already an additional deficit for this year for which the Board is at risk. Based on the report of the Administration and Finance Committee which the Board adopted on November 9, I believe the Board intends to consider the use of Title II money later in the year for other purposes, but not to apply it to the $1.4 million deficit. C. I understand that the Board has taken the same position in regard-to Revenue Sharing funds and any Title XX funds which may be reallocated to this County by the State from funds unexpended last year. 00227 Microfilmed with 6=3 order Arthur G. Will November 23, 1976 Page 2 SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING PROBLEMS If I correctly understand the directions the Board has given me., the following steps should be taken by the Board in order to completely eliminate the $1.4 million deficit: Eliminate the full-time equivalent of the numbers of positions listed in the column headed "Total Positions" in the Social Service Department, effective COB (Close of Business) December 31, 1976: Vacant Filled Total Positions Positions Classification Positions As Of 11/23/76 As Of 11/23/76 Assistant County Welfare Director 1 1 0 Social Work Supervisor IV 1 1 0 Social Work Supervisor III. 1 0 1 Social Work Supervisor II 2 2 0 Social Work Supervisor I 9.8 3.8 6 Vocational -Services Sup. II .8 0 .8 Supervising Clerk I _ 6* 3 3 Social Work Practitioner II 10 4 6 Social Work Practitioner I 5 3 2 Social Worker III 29.6 7.1 22.5 Senior Clerk 19* 16 3 Intermediate Typist Clerk 37.1* 16.6 20.5 Typist Clerk 17* 14 3 Typist Clerk (P.I.) 2 2 0 141.3 73.5 67.8 (79.1)* *Once vacated, these positions should be transferred to the Medical Services Department to use as offsets to temporary staff rather than abolishing the positions entirely. 00228 f. TA PON W` Arthur G. Will November 23, 1976 Page 3 SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING PROBLEMS It is my understanding from the wording of the November 9 Board Order that along with the action recommended herein, I have the authority to obtain seniority lists from the Director of Personnel, issue layoff notices, and conclude all other necessary action to accomplish the Board's objective. Other than a report to the Board following the effective date of the elimination of positions, I foresee no further need for Board action on this matter, to the extent of the $1.4 million deficit. We will, of course, be making a separate report on next year's-deficit at an appropriate time, CLVM:clq cc: R. E. Jornlin, Welfare Director 00229 In the Board of"-Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 r 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of contract #35044-316-736-2310 with James F. Austin for evaluation of Projects "Open Space, Community Deten- tion, and Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion" The Board having considered the request by the County Probation* Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract, #35044=316-736-2310,- with James F. Austin, consultant, for evaluation of Projects, "Open Space, Community Detention, and-Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion" from November 1, 1976 to ' February 28, 1978 not to exceed $20,000, 90% Federal Funds. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. - 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc- County Probation Officer Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 32th day of November 1976 c/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSOIV, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By Deputy Clerk H 24 12M - 154+ 2'ar, Craig 00430 STati'DaRD CONTRACT • (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number 35044-316-736-2310 Department: Probation Subject: Evaluation of Projects, Open Space, Community Detention, and Pittsburg.Antioch Diversion 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: James F. Austin Capacity: an individual Address: 2049 Oak Street, sl San Francisco, CA 94117 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is November 1, 1976 and it terminates February 28, 1978 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 20,000. 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, . subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. B. Pr6ject. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Open Space: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders. Grant Award No. J-2761-1-75 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Section 31000 and 26227 and 53703 Penal Code Section 1203.14 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By I P. Kenn By hairman,' BoaSupervisors lr } �(�'�SCl tTrO 4 i (Designate official capacity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) State of California By 7 '- County of Contra Costa } ss. ry CroigDeputy I ACKNOWLEDGENRIT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Department known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By v ✓ �' t they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Form Approved: County Counsel Dated: `f '"iJ n liZ& Rosemary Matossian Deputy Netavy-Publ'c/Deput5r unty C 7) (,_4.5,- 6) 00231 3 Contra Costa County Standard Fora PAI tiEh'T PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) Number 35044-316-736-2310 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [W C. $20,000, after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided or incurred by Contractor hereunder. 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 1. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the nanner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3_ Right to Vithhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. , 4. Audit Exceptions_ Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. (-x-46!9 ?:-1.. 6/76) 00232 F� t Humber: 35044-316-736-2310 SERVICE PLAN Contractor will perform a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the Project. Contractor agrees to provide the services and deliver the products specified in the Project Plan, entitled, "Evaluation of Projects - Open Space, Community Detention, ar:d Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion", which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in this Contract. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Item 19 - Insurance of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. Office of Criminal Justice Planning Standard Third Part Contract Provisions is substituted and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A (attached) and made a part of this agreement. INITIALS: Co tractor C Department f 00233 f� ,.. . ..T.- 'Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal. State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 0023 (A-4616 REV 6/76) -1- :a r� _id Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -2- 00235 i; Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts 6 Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- 00236 a F- Y t• OFFICE OF CRIMII.'AL JUSTICE PLANNING STANDARD THIRD PARTY CONTRACT PROVISIONS 1_ Cc.-.pliance with Grant Award. Contra Costa County, hereafter referred to as Subgrantee, and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning, hereafter referred to as OCJP, entered into a grant award, kL35044-316-736-2310 here- after referred to as "grant award." Said grant awaril is incorporated in the within Agreement. It is expressly understood and agreed that Subgrantee will retain ultinate control and responsibility for the grant award project and the Contractor agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of said grant award applicable to Subgrantee in the conduct of the project. 2. Ce-aliance with Fiscal Requirements. The Contractor agrees to perform under this {agreement in accordance with all terms and conditions contained in the OCJP Fiscal Affairs Manual and the financial guidelines prescribed by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (hereafter referred to as LEAA) and the OCJP. 3_ Assignment or Subcontracting. No performance of this Agreement or any portion thereof may be assigned or subcontracted by the Contractor without the express written consent of Subgrantee and any attempt by the Contractor to assign or • subcontract any performance of the terms of this Agreement without the express written consent of Subgrantee shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Whenever the Contractor is authorized to subcontract or assign, he will include all the terms of this Agreement in each such subcon- tract or assignment. 4. Assurance of Compliance with Civil Rights Laws. The Contractor hereby assures that it will conply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1961 and all re;uirenents imposed by or pursuant to regulations of the Department of Justice, and the LEAA issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this Agreement or under any project, program, or activity supported by this Agreement. The Contractor will comply with Justice Department Equal Employment Regulations in federally-assisted programs (28 CFR Part 42, Subpart D) to the end that employment discrimination in such programs an the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The Contractor recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement of the foregoing covenants against discrimination. If this Agreement provides for payment to the Contractor in excess of $10,000, the Contractor shall conply with Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as supplemented. The Contractor shall be required to have an affirmative action plan which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementation of equal employment. 5. 1Saintenance and Inspection of Contractual Records. The Contractor agrees that the Subgrantee, the OCJP, the LEAA, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly au[fhorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe any directly pertinent books, .documents, papers and records of the Contractor, involving transactions relating "to this Agreement. Such material trust be kept and maintained for a period of three years after termination of the grant award or unti-1 an audit is completed by OCJP and LEAA and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, whichever is sooner. The Contractor agrees to keep and maintain all records required by the Fiscal Affairs Manual, the financial guidalines prescribed by LEAA, and-any other records that may be required by other lat-is or regulations of Federal, state or local government units. 1 0023•"1 .err.-i ;�.^,"T�'T"".. ... E `•;^.....'��z u•.;s'Xe `.'C'Y,.... a .r, .� - C iR fid; t 5i u,>k EXHIBIT A t. 6. Copyrights and Rights in Data. Where activities supported by this Agreement produce original computer programs, writing, sound recordings, pictorial re- productions, drawings or other graphical representation and works of any sinilar nature (the term cox.putcr programs includes executable computer programs and supporting data in any form), the OCJP, the LEAA, and Subgrantee reserve the right to use, duplicate and disclose, in whole or in part, in any manner for any purpose whatsoever, and to authorize others to do so. If the material is subject to copyright, the Subgrantee reserves the right to copyright such and the Contractor agrees not to copyright such material. If the material is copyrighted, the OCJP and the LEAA reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use such materials, in the whole or in part, and to authorizes others to do so. 7. Publications. Both the OCJP and the Subgrantee reserve the right to require the Contractor not to publish, and the Contractor thereupon shall refrain from publishing original books, manuals, films or other copyrightable material produced by activities supported by this Agreement, whether copyrighted or not, that may be designated by the OCJP or the Subgrantee. Such right shall be exercised by addressing written notice to that effect to the Contractor. Before publishing any materials produced by activities supported by this Agreement, . the Contractor shall notify Subgrantee and OCJP sixty days in advance of any such publication. If the Subgrantee and OCJP fail to exercise the right to prohibit publication as set forth above within sixty days of the receipt of the notice of intent to publish, the Contractor may publish said material. The Contractor shall furnish twenty copies of the materials so published to Subgrantee and OCJP_ Any such publication by the Contractor shall include on the title page the following standard disclaimer: "The preparation of these materials was financially aided through a Federal grant from the Lar. Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning under the Omr ibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1908, as amended. The opinions, findings and conclusions in this publication are those of til_ author and are not necessarily those of the Law Enforcement Assistance Adtainistration or the Office of. Criminal Justice Plaaning." "OCJP reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use these materials, and to authorize others to do so." 8. Patents. If any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or as a result of ►,Tori: pzrfori-iied under this agreement, the Contractor shall refer the discovery or invention to Subgrantee and OCJP. The Contractor hereby agrees that determinations of rights to inventions or discoveries made under this Agreement shall be made by LEAA, or its duly authorized representative who shall have the sole and exclusive porters to determine whether or not and where a patent application should be filed and to determine the disposition of all rights in such inventions or discoveries, including title to and license rights under any patent application or patent which may issue thereon. The determination of LEAA. or its duly authorized representative, shall be accepted as final. Th.- Contractor hrContractor agrees and otherwise-recognizes that LEAA, OCJP, and Subgrantee shall acquire at least an irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to practice and have practiced throughout the world for governmental purposes any 'invention made in the course of or under this Agreement. 9_ Contractor Worn: Hours and Safety Standards. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess of $2,500 $2,000 for construction contracts) and involves the employment of mechanics or laborers, the Contractor agrees: a) That each mechanic pr laborer will have wages computed on the basis of a standard work day of eight hours and a standard uork week of forty hours. Work in excess of the standard work vieek or day is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at the rate of not less than one-half times tine basic rate of pay for all hours 'work in excess of eight hours in any calendar day or forty hours in the work creek; b) That no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under construction safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor by regulation (23 CFP. 1518)_ These requirenents do not 2 00238 1� r EXHIBIT A apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 10. Clean Air Act. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess of $100,000, the Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970. Violations shall be reported to OCJP and the regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency. 11. Public Availability of Information. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Sections 6250 Through 62060 of the Government Code of the State of California and the LEAA Guide for Comprehensive Law Enforcenent Planning • and Action Grants relating to tie availability to the public of iinti iable records or other documents that are pertiniDnt to the receipt or expenditure of LEAH funds. 12. Security and Privacy. (a) The Contractor agrees that, except as provided by federal law other than the Crime Control Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. Sections 370) et seq.), none of its officers or employees shall use or reveal any research or statistical information furnished by any person and identifiable to any specific private person for any purpose other than the purpose for which it was obtained. Copies of such information shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceedings. (b) Criminal history information: . (1) The term "criminal history information's includes records and _ related data, compiled by law enforcement agencies for purposes of identifying criminal offenders and alleged offenders and maintaining as to such persons summaries of arrest, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, rehabilitation and release. (2) If the Contractor utilizes "criminal history information," the Contractor shall comply with the following: All criminal history information collected, stored, or disseminated shall coitaia, to the maximum extent feasible, dispositions as well as arrest data where arrest data is included therein. The collection, storage, and dissemination of such information shall take place under procedures reasonably designed to insure that all such Information is kept current therein; the Contractor shall assure that the security and privacy of all information is adequately provided for and such information shall only be used for law en- forcement and criminal justice and other lawful purposes. In ' addition, an individual who believes that criminal history information concerning him contained in an automated system is inaccurate, in- complete, or maintained in violation of the Crime Control Act of 1973, shall, upon satisfactory verification of his identity, be entitled to review such information to obtain a copy of it for the purpose of challenge or correction. (c) Any person violating the Security and Privacy provisions of this Contract or of the Crime Control Act 5T 1973 j42 U.S,C. Section 3771 (c)) or any rule, regulations, or order issued thereunder, shall be fined not to exceed $10,000 in addition to any other penalty imposed by law. (d) The contractor assures that the foregoing provisions of the Security and Privacy clause shall be incorporated into all of its subcontracts- 3 00239 IMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i EXH 13 i i x 13. "Adequate competition_ All -procurement transactions regardless of whether negotiated or advertised and without regard to dollar value shall be conducted in a manner so as to provide maxum open and free competition. The grantee should be alert to organisational conflicts of interest or noncompetitive- practices among contractors which may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade. Contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work and/or RFPs for a proposed procurement shall be excluded from bidding or submitting a proposal to compete for the award of such procurement." t - r 4 00240 i y EXHIBIT "B" , 2OL9 Oak Street No. 1 San Francisco, California 94117 (4.15) 3S7-6145 John A. Davis County Probation Officer 10th Floor, County Administration Bldg. ;'artinez, California 94553 Dr. Krisberg and I are pleased to submit this proposal to evaluate projects "Open Space", "Community Detention", and the third year activities of the Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion Project. Our evaluation plan assumes a continuing relationship with the various projects and your administration throughout the duration of the grant period. It is our feeling that evaluators must maintain a close and cooperative relationship with those being evaluated to produce meaningful results. To ensure this re- lationship exists, we have proposed in our work plan periodic reports and conferences with key officials to keep them abreast of our activities and preliminary findings. The research team listed in the proposal constitues a staff :with expertise in juvenile justice matters and demonstrated capabilities in the area of project evaluations and report writing. Of particular importance is the team's experiences in Contra Costa County reflecting a sensitivity to local issues and concerns.. if there is anything in the proposal which is unclear or -requires clarification we will be glad to provide additional detail. We hill also negotiate any changes in the proposal or design that tray be useful in improving the evaluation. Best regards, J`es F. Austin Principal Investigator t i i:rca File 00241 i EXHxBTT 10V EVALUATIOii OF PROJECTS OPEN SPACE cola LAITY DENTION "DP�TTS3URG-A1�TIOCH DIVERSION A RESEkRCH PROPOSAL SUBitITTr.D TO THE - CONTRA COSTS PROBATION DEPARTTtEI1T October 22, 1976 Z oo242 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTIOY II. TECHNICAL APPROACH 9 III. WORK PLAN ..................... ............14 IV. PERSOMML ...................................34 V. ESTL'IATED COSTS ............................36 APPENDIX A - RESUMES ............................38 APPEIMIX B - DATA COLLECTION SHEET ..............45 L - i i t 00243 E' EXHIBIT B I. INTRODUCTION Arcroach to Evaluation The evaluation of juvenile justice programs is an in- teoral part of the delivery of services to children and -the community. Given the present "state of the art" most pro- grans will likely be experimental in nature. Initial community efforts are often exploratory and designed to provide more accurate data for subsequent programming. I. is therefore essential that evaluation be built into the process of developing and refining juvenile justice practices and procedures. Evaluation research helps establish the criteria for performance accountability and provides useful data to upgrade the level of planning and project design. - Measuring the degree of program success in reaching juvenile justice objectives is an important part of evaluation. Once the criteria for successful performance can be agreed upon,, rigorous quantiative designs are employed to yield precise measures of project indicators. But, excellent research methodology cannot make up for ambiguous or contradictory expectations about project objectives. The first role TL. ...,of the evaluator is to assist project staff in defining their goals and make explicit the policy assumptions guiding the project. 00244 I EXHIBIT "B" 3 Unfortunately, while most evaluators will agree with this- perspective, in reality they tend to rely exclusively on quantitaive methods and ignore the potential richness of detailed process evaluations. This trend also creates evaluations that concentrate heavily on the start-up and termination phases of the project's life. They come during the initial phases of the project to set up their data systems and then disappear until the final months of the project to collect and analyze the data. Understandablye such evaluation approaches offer little in understanding how the results were accomplished and under what conditions. Our position states that the evaluator must be intimately familiar with the daily operations of the project. This requires constant contact, in the form of regular field visits, with projects to gather the necessary process and/o^ historical data. In sum, evaluation studies must provide all av;�_i.lable data (both quantitative and qualitative) to promote the maximum amount of learning from each ex- penditure of action and research funds. Overview of the Status Offense Issue The treatment of "status offenders" within the juvenile justice system remains at the core of an intense social policy debate. 00246 :.r.c c-a... . :mac.. .r,: ..:.. II . 1 EXHIBIT B 00246 I, • EXHIBIT B I. INTRODUCTION' 3ncroach to Evaluation The evaluation of juvenile justice programs is an in- teoral part of the delivery of services to children and -the community. Given the present "state of the art" most pro- grar:.s will likely be experimental in nature. Initial community efforts are often exploratory and designed to provide more accurate data for subsequent programming. It is therefore essential that evaluation be built into the process of developing and refining juvenile justice practices and procedures. Evaluation research helps establish the criteria for performance accountability and provides useful data to upgrade the level of planning and project design. - Measuring the degree of program success in reaching juvenile justice objectives is an important part of evaluation. Once the criteria for successful performance can be agreed upon,, rigorous quantiative designs are employed to yield precise ' measures of project indicators. But, excellent research methodology cannot make up for ambiguous or contradictory expectations about project objectives. The first role ;sof the evaluator is to assist project staff in defining their o' goals and make explicit the policy assumptions guiding the project. 00244 F3 6 i! 7• 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION ............................... 1 II. TECHNICAL APPROACH ......................... 9 III. WORK PLAN ..................................14 IV. PERSONNEL ...................................34 V. ESTL'MM COSTS ............................36 APPENDIXA - RESUMES ............................38 APP£IMIX B - DATA COLLECTION SHEET ..............45 1 l r , O0243 EXHIBIT "B" EVALIIATIOPJ OF PROJECTS OPEN SPACE COhNITY DETENTION, "D PITTSBURG-ANTIOCH DIVERSION A2sF.ARCH PROPOSAL SUBP.IITTED TO THE CONTRA COSTA PROBATION DEPART-,lENT October 22, 1976 OQ242 s w� TABLE OF =TENTS PaEc I. INTRODUCTION ............................... 1 II. TECHNICAL APPROACH ......................... 9 III. WORK PL9N ..................................14 IV. PERSONUEL ...................................34 V. ESTD ATED COSTS ............................36 APPENDIKA - RESUMES ............................38 A-z'PEIMIX B - DATA COLLECTION SHEET ..............45 i r. O0243 a EXHIBIT B I. INTRODUCTION 3zcroach to Evaluation The evaluation of juvenile justice programs is an in- tel=al part of the delivery of services to children and 'the community. Given the present "state of the art" most pro- grams will likely be experimental in nature. Initial community efforts are often exploratory and designed to provide more accurate data for subsequent programming. It is therefore essential that evaluation be built into the process of developing and refining juvenile justice practices and procedures. Evaluation research helps establish the criteria for performance accountability and provides useful data to upgrade the level of planning and project design. - Measuring the degree of program success in reaching juvenile justice objectives is an important part of evaluation. Once the criteria for successful performance can be agreed upon,. rigorous quantiative designs are •employed to yield precise measures of project indicators. But, excellent research rethodology cannot make up for ambiguous or contradictory expectations about project objectives. The first role ;jof the evaluator is to assist project staff in defining their goals a-rid rake explicit the policy assumptions guiding the project. - IL00244 C4 2 =valuation research should yield valuable data about the process of inplementing project strategies. This should include the adequacy of funding, staffing needs, organ- izational linkages and necessary linkages with other community agencies. There should be. a detailed chronology of project development as well as a thorough description of the typical way in which the project operated. The evaluator should produce an empirical charting of the administrative structure of the project and pinpoint where staff energies are concentrated. Also, there should be an analysis of how clients flow through the various project components. This form of data depends heavily upon qualitative methods that provide a process or historical analysis of how the project operated internally and its assumptions relative to areas -it is attempting to address. Ln general evaluations should consist of a blend of quant- itative and qualitative research methods to produce _ rigorous measures of outcome and accurate descriptions of project success or failure. And, attempts should be made to link process and outcome evaluation measures. Thus, the balanced and complete evaluation will indicate not only how many delinquents recidivated, but also how the development of the project affected the recidivism rate and other outcome indicators (e.g., cost benefit ratio). 00245 EXHIBIT "B" 3 Unfortunately, while Most evaluators will agree with this• perspective, in reality they tend to rely exclusively on auantitaive methods and ignore the potential richness of detailed process evaluations. This trend also creates evaluations that concentrate heavily on the start-up and termination phases of the project's life. They come during the initial phases of the project to set up their data systems and then disappear until the final months of the project to collect and analyze the data. Understandably, such evaluation approaches offer little in understanding how the results were accomplished and under what conditions. Our position states that the evaluator must be intimately familiar with the daily operations of the project. This requires constant contact, in the form of regular field visits, with projects to gather the necessary process and/or historical data. In sum, evaluation studies must provide all available data (both quantitative and qualitative) to promote the maximum amount of learning from each ex- penditure of action and research funds. Overview of the Status Offense Issue The treatment of "status offenders" within the juvenile justice systen remains at the core of an intense social policy debate. 00245 fla _--� i 4 There are many who argue that the court should relinquish its jurisdiction over status offenders. Others believe chat behaviors collectively labelled "status offenses" represent serious forms of deviance often symptomatic of severe personal and family crises. Few observers are happy about present methods of processing such youth and most advocate more community involvement, greater attention to strengthening family units, and the creation of more appropiate dispositional alternatives which meet the needs of such children and which do not stLmatize them. Status offenses include a aide range of child behavior and the lav gives the court wide latitude in defining and handling this specific form of delinquency. Some feel that the large scope of these offenses makes the juvenile justice system both the arbiter and interpreters of boral behavior. And, there is the concern that status offenders are denied fundamental legal protections because of the vagueness of juvenile statutes. Beyond the issue of vagueness, there are many observers who argue that early labelling of youth may. actually pro- pel thea towards later criminal careers. Children become victims of the "self-fullfilling prophesy". The proponents 00247 i EXHIBIT "B" S of the labelling view assert that the court is too formal and bureacratic to deal effectively with the human problems posed by status offenders and their families. It is argued that .treats of punishment are inappropiate for s'ta'tus offenders. There is ample disagreement about the characteristics of status offenders. Are these juvenile offenders merely transitory forms of deviance or do they mask severe behavioral problems. Because the term status offense is a legal category, status offenders may represent soph?stcated delinquents who have escaped •the more severe label of delinouent. There exist little data to answer these questions. Indeed, much of the heated debate on this issue has been conducted witout evidence that would clarify points of disagreement. Thus, it is necessary to carefully describe -the status of- fenders personal and delinquent attributes -to facilitate informed juvenile justice reforms in this area. Status offenders may or may not be severely disturbed; they may or mai► not come from fractured families., There is no reliable data suggesting that status offenders graduate to careers of serious delinquency. Yet, fie cannot rule out the possibility that early intervention with some specific r 00248 4f 6 categories of youth may assist their Crowing up process. We find ourselves in an area with little solid data but intense controversy. These conditions suggest the crucial and strategic role of cogent evaluation studies in de- fining and elucidating some dimensions of this complex issue. Perhaps the greatest concern over the handling of status offenders surrounds the fact, that in most jurisdictions, the court has only limited treatment alternatives at its disposal. Often status offenders experience similar or identical treatment as more serious delinquents. Santa Clara University of Law Professor Aiden Gough writes: ... clearly the greatest vice (in the status offense jurisdiction) is the treatment of non-criminal but ungovernable children in essentially the same way as we treat youth- ful offenders of the criminal law with max- imum opportunity given the former to become the latter. (Gough, ABA Standards Draft:7) A recent National Advisory Commission on Courts took the position that status offenders should not be placed in the same institutions reserved for other delinquents. And, the International Association of Chiefs of Police states: 00249 . Fps, y - .. _... . • EXHIBIT "B" 7 The mixing together of status offenders and real delinquents in detention facilities and reform schools helps provide learning experiences for the non-delinquent to be- come a real delinquent. (Kobetz and Bosage, 1974:215). Another major concern in the incarceration of status offenders concerns the assertion that the goal of re- habilitation is not being realized. Some regard incarceration per se as harmful to children. Others point out that instit- utionalization removes the child from the family and the community which may be the real locus of the problem. Treating the child without attending to community and family deficiencies may be non-productive. Many therapists stress the need to work out family-centered problems in the "natual setting" of the family and community. Incarceration limits the possibility for utilizing exist- ing community resources -to aid in the child's normal mat- uration. Deinstitutionalization of status offenders is now a matter of public law. Jurisdictions across the nation and the federal government have stated the policy that all status offenders be removed from institutions reserved for more serious delinquents. But beyond the simplistic alternative of "leaving kids alone" there is an urgent need to develop meaningful alternatives to help status offenders and at the same time protect the community. 00250 Q 8 •.rye �• }A n -ern A l} p Nhet'r-er the proposed alternatives as provided in projects "Open Space", "Community Detention", or diversion will meet this argent public need remains the central concern of this proposed evaluation study. Vie hope to contribute to the maximum effecyiveness and efficiency of this interlocking project effort and shed light upon the dynamics of successful programming in this new area of juvenile justice and human services. i t _ 00251 l = M1 i. f� EXHIBIT "B" - 9 II. TECOICAL APPROACH The primary questions to be addressed by the evaluation as outlined in the RFP suggest goals or objectives that are easily measurable and quantifiable. 2-lost of these "questions" attempt to measure how the projects affected the handling of status offenders. All of them beg the question, "Were these changes the result of the projectsrintervention or can some other factors explain changes in recidivism, detention rates, probation caseloads, and costs?" In other words, the objective of the evaluation is to develop a research design that will answer the question, '14hat would have happen to these status offenders had these projects not existed?" This question assumes a problematic nature given the fact there is no possibility for implementing an experimental-control groups design with randomization. The projects are designed to process all status ofenders whcih means there can be no control group. Given this situation quasi-experimental designs that approxiamte the rigor of experimental evaluation designs are required. While such designs lack the power of experimental designs they do allow the evaluator to begin addressing issues that necessitate a "control- like" or comparative group. For the purposes of this evaluation two quasi-experimental designs will be employed. Both strategies rely upon pre-project measurements for comparative analyses. As these designs are explained below we will attempt to illustrate hoar such designs will be used to evaluate "Open Space" and "Community Detention". We are assuming that the existing design being used to evaluate Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion Project will remain intact during the duration of its third year of 00252 ii 10 activities. lie anticipate that the primary task there is to continue collecting data and assess the three years experiences of that diversion effort. Time-Series Experimant This design will be used to address the following two questions as outlined in the RFP: 1.) How many juveniles are detained in Juvenile Hall for status offenses, pre and post adjudication, over the course of the project: 2.) What effect does the program have on the number of status offenders in private institutional placement or on formal probation? Both of these evaluation questions are asking the impact of the program upon detention rates and and the placement of status offenders on probation or in private institutions. In order to adequately assess the programs contribution to deinstitutionalization one must' collect data not only during the course of the program, but also for a sufficient pre-project period. Changes bewteen these two periods of comparison can then be attributed to the introduction of an experimental or trst variable i.e., the deinstitutionalization projects. The logic of this design can be portrayed as follows: 01 02 03 04 OS 0bX 07 08 09 010 011 012 Each 0 represents a measurement taken. In this case it would represent status offender det-.ntion population_ rates. The X-represents the intro- duction of the deinstitutionalization program. If these projects are 00253 _ 00253 ' EXHIBIT "B" 11 successful in reducing the number of detained status offenders prior to adjuducation, then we would expect a dramatic dip in the population rates of the detention facilties for these types of delinquents. The same design will be used to measure changes over time for police arrest rates, petition filing rates, prpbation caseloads, etc. These related juvenile justice agency rates are important in accessing how the other components of the system react to the deinstitutionalization effort. For example it may be that police begin to arrest more juveniles after the projects are implemented in reaction to what they consider a liberal treatment of delinquents. Or the opposite affect may result. In sum, it is important to capture all of these system changes as they occurr duirng the course of the program. Ex Post Facto Analvses This design will be used to address the following two questions as stated in the RFP: 1.) What is the subsequent arrest and dispositional history of project juveniles while in community detention? 2.) What are the cost savings to the county, if any, from the program? Here again it is being asked what impact did the•program have upon recidivism and cost savings. In order to adequately assess this problem . we must establish some kind of comparative group to serve as a baseline for subsequent measures. It is not enough to say that delinquents processed through the program exhibited a 101 recidivism rate and a 20% petition filing rate. The_question still remians, "In relation to what?'_' "'he Ex Post Facto Design involves creating a comparative group from a pre-project population. For this study we may use all status offenders referred to the Department 3 months prior to the program's start date. 00251 Or, if there is considerable slippage during the initial months of the program's operztions resulting in not all status offenders being admitted to the program, it will be desirable to use those individuals for "control" purposes. The difference between this design and an experimental desi8p is that the groups may not be equivalent on all relevant characteristics. They are not randomly assigned nor is there equivalency on the important time dimension. In other words, the two groups are separated by the fact they reflect differing time periods. The following graphic portrayal may clarify this point: Project Group 03 X 04 Pre-Project Group 01 02 The two groups are drawn from differing time periods. However, if it can be demonstrated that they are similar on all relevant personal and delinquent characteristics then comparisons between the two groups are warranted. Specifically, we wish to go beyond the computing of a recidivsim rate for the project particpants. We wish to assess if this recidivism rate is an improvement over prior status offender behavior as measured via the pre-project group. The saftey of the community and how it is affected is an important question to be answered using such a design. ' The second question of cost must also be answered. Does the program effort reduce, maintain, or increase costs of processing such youth. Comparisons between the pre-project and proje=ct populations can be made that begin to answer this question. (Those familair with cost-benefit analyses understand that cost-benefit analyses are never complete or precise). By ascertaining the movements of the pre-project group and computing the ai—,r_istrative costs a comparison can be made with the 00255 t 13 EXHIBIT "B" dein-stitutionalization population. From this comparative analyses will flow an estimated and projected cost savings ratio (reg? savir�s manifest themselves in actual reapport- io:w eats of the county budgets) suggesting the cost savings potential of deinstitutionalization efforts. Summary These two designs will serve to guide the evaluation in answer-- the primary questions or hypotheses. The remiaining research questions (e.g. , impact on school performance, the family setting, and the effect of volunteers and paraprofessional contact) will be answered using comphrehensive data col- lection and analyses procedures. In fact, our proposal is predicated- upon an extensive quantitative and qualitative methodological approach. Extensive data will be collected on each project participant and the "comparison" groups in concert with the requirements of this evaluation. The specific details of our data collection procedures are explained in the following section (III. Work Plan). . - We'hare proposed these quasi-experimental designs for the purpose of going beyond a simplistic and meaningless process evaluation of the project's daily activities. We hope to provide Contra Costa Probation with a study that will generate powerful conclusions in terms of the program's rale in changing and reforming this area of juvenile justice. 00255 k 14 III. 110.0 PLAN Task 1.0 Participate in Orientation Meeting with Project Staff Task 2.0 Develop Evaluation Design and Prepare Data Collection Instruments 2.1 Refine and Operationalize Major Variables 2.2 Refine Research Hypotheses 2.3 Specify Data Collection Methods and Instruments 2.4 Develop Reporting Techniques 'Task 3.0 Assist'Project Staff in Training Staff in Use of Various Data Collection Instruments Task 4.0 Refine and Finalize the Evaluation Design Task 5.0 Conduct the Evaluation 5.1 Implement Procedures for Confidentiality and Protection of Human Subjects 5.2 Compile Data for Analysis and Computer Processing Task 6.0 Prepare Interim Progress Reports Task 7.0 Prepare Final Report 00257 �a MENEM" 15 EXHIBIT "B" Task 1.0--P_ARICIPAT£ IN ORIErTATION HEETUIC WITH PROJECT STAFF i:ithin two weeks of contract award, the senior research team pro- poses that a one-day orientation meeting be held at each of the three project sites (Richmond, Concord, and Pittsburg-Antioch). The major purposes of this initial meeting would include: (1) Establish liason relationships with project staff (2) Identify project structures and procedures (3) Identify data accessibility and quality (4) Specify evaluation needs and concerns 00255 t 16 Task 2.0--DFVELOP EVALUATION DESIGN MID PREPARE DATA COLLECTION INSTMTC ENTS. Task 2_0 incorporates the following task as specified in the Request For Proposals dated October 6, 1976 (revised): --The evaluator will be required to train staff in the use of various data collection instruments during the early phase of the projects (November 1, 1976 through December 1, 1976). The basic evaluation design, as explained in the Werk Plan will consist of two quasi-experimental designs; the Time-Series Experiment and the Ex Post Facto Design involving matching techniques. Although these designs are not as rigorous or valid as experimental-control groups design with randomization, they are appropiate given the nature of the experimental projects where randomization is not possible. The exception to this task will be the Pittsburg-Antioch Juvenile Diversion project which is presently in its third and final year of operations. This project contains an already existing evaluation design as developed by the project's evaluator, Ms. Gini Scott. The design is of an experimental-control nature. The primary task for that project, in terms of evaluation needs, is to develop data col- lection instruments that are amenable to computerization " The period of time allocated for this task accounts for the necessity of carefully developing a final design in a relatively new area of juvenile justice alternatives. We will use this time to make repeated site visits in refining the design, developing data collection instruments, identifying major hypotheses to be tested, and field testing our evaluation methods. t 00259 17 EXHIBIT "B" The success of this evaluation effort will depend heavily upon the cooperation of the local projects, the Probation Department, and related juvenile justice system agencies for baseline and operations data enabling an assessment of the impact of "Open Space", "Co=munity Detention", and the Pittsburg-Antioch Diver- sion Project on the juvenile justice system, and on youth and their behavior. a.x ; ' 00260 lg Task 2.1-.REF TIM AM OPERATIONALIZE ILUOR VARIABLES A cogent evaluation effort requires that major variables under study be identified and operationalized in concert with the goals (or hypotheses) of the projects. These operational defintions specify how the variables will actually be measured or quantified. This, in turn, serves to identify data needs, sources, and collect- tion methods required to complete the evaluation. We realize that it may not be feasible or possible to collect data on all these dimensions of the projects. However,* they are presented here to alert the reviewer to the potential scope of a complete evaluation under ideal conditions. Major Variables Delinquent Behaviors Delinquent Characteristics Delinquents' Attitudes Juvenile Justice System Dispositional Alternatives Juvenile Ju:.tice System Practices and Procedures Costs School Adjustment Family Adjustment 00261 �I EXHIBIT "B" 19 Oaerational Defintions Delinquent Behaviors (delinquency)--The behavior of juveniles that is in violation of a statute in the particular jurisdiction. Included here are both status offenses and delinquent acts that would constitute a crime if co=itted by adults. Measurement of delinquency will be accomplished by official police report data (and conviction or adjud- ication data if avialable). We are _ce•_res=ed in the extent, rates, ' and seriousness of delinquency. Seriousness of delinquency will be measured using the revised version of Sellin-Wolgang scale of seriousness (Sellin and Wolfgang, 1964). Delinouent Characteristics-- Those SES and delinquent attributes used to define and isolate various typologies of delinquents. These indicators would include age, sex, ehtnicity and race, delinquent history, educational level, employment history, truancy history, drug and alcohol history, parental marital status, geographic location, etc: Much are these data are available in court records and probation records. " Delinquents' Attitudes--Those statements, opinions, and perceptions directed toward (a) the juvenile justice system and (b) the youth's offense(s). Attitudes will be collected through group and individual interviews using a structured interview format. We will also be col- lecting attitudinal data on the youth's impressions of the projects. :Iu�}ih1le Justice Svstem Dispositional Alternatives (rates)-- These refer to measures of the use of dispositional alternatives used by the system at various points in which children are in contact with the system. Included here are rates of police arrests, petition filing, detention, adjudication, and disposition. 00262 20 [,'e wish to collect system data at all points of the juvenile justice system to determine how the project's implementation affects police, intake, court, probation, and correctional agency behavior. It is conceivable that these agencies will re-define their activities, roles and functions as a result of the deinstitutionalization initiative. Specifically, the RFP requests that impacts upon detention rates, and the placement of status offenders in private institutional settings or formal probation supervision be addressed. This data is necessary for a total cost-benefit analysis. Data will be generated from various crime control agencies (i.e., police, probation, the juvenile court, etc.). Juvenile Justice Svstem Practices and Procedures--The juvenile justice system refers to official structures including, but not limited to., juvenile courts, law-enforcement agencies, probation, after-care, detention facilties, and correctional institutions. Its procedures refer to laws; administrative policies, informal operating norms, and agreements between various components of the juvenile justice system. The major focus will center on changes in this variable. In other words, how does deinstitutionalization affect the practices and procedures of the present system. We will depend primarily upon our informal and formal observations of key actors and agencies in the system. We will also attempt to maintain detailed accounts of the process by which these projects affected the total juvenile justice system in the project areas. Juvenile Justice Costs--Costs we define as the use per resources per some agreed upon and established system unit or output. We recognize that both definitions and measures of cost vary from community. However, these variations should be minimal given the local nature of the projects within a similar geographic location. 00263 EXHIBIT "B" 21 There are many types of costs. Here we are referring to processing costs i.e., khat does it cost the system to process these delinluents via the co=unty detention or diversion efforts as opposed to tra- ditional alternatives School Ad Lustment--This refers to the adaptation of the youth into the school system. Pleasures of scholl adjustment will include school attendence. and academic achievement. Due to the confidential nature of school records it may be most difficult to secure such indicators of school adjustment. Family Adjustment--How well a child assimialtes into the family setting has often be cited as a primary cause of delinquent behavior. Thus, it is appropiate for this evaluation to study how deinstitutionalization impedes or facilitates the delinquents adjustment within his/her family. Adjustment will be measured by statements and attitudes of both the child and the parents gathered through in-depth interviews. 00264 22 Task 2.2--REFI\TE PMSE•ARCH IIYPOrIfESES The selection and formualtion of specific major hypotheses serves to guide the task of testing various dimensions and impacts of the deinstitutionalization effort. Although there is a paucity of research literature in this substantive area, we have chosen to state the alternative hypotheses as- suming that restitution is a positive factor in affecting delinquents and the juvenile justice system. The basis for' selecting these major hypotheses is linked directly to (1) the major variables defined above and (2) the questions to be addressed by the evalaution as outlined in the RFP. These hypotheses are similiar to the stated goals of each project. Hypothesis 1: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders reduces the incidence of delinquent behavior among status offenders. Hypothesis 2: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders reduces the seriousness of delinquent behavior among status offenders. Hypothesis 3: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders reduces the incidence of detention rates for status offenders. Hypothesis 3: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders reduces the penetration of such offenders into the juvenile justice system. Hypothesis 4: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders improves the school adjustment of such offenders. Hypothesis S: Deinstitutionalization cf ststus offenders reduces . costs to the juvenile justice system. 00265 w EXHIBIT 'B" 23 Hypothesis b: Deinstitutionalization of status offenders improves the level of family adjustment apong such offenders . Other factors such as community involvement, volunteer usage, project assumptions, and intra-agency cooperation gill impact the level of accepatance or rejection of these hypotheses and aid in explaining how the project failed or succedded in meeting its goals. These variables will aid in the analysis of how deinstitutionalization works most effectively, under what kinds of conditions, and with what kind(s) of youth. 4 M 002600 24 Task 2.3--SPECIFY D..TA COLLECTION METHODS AND INSTRUMENTS G'e expect to rely heavily upon existing records, documents and files, process observation techniques and interviews (both group and individ- ual) to collect most of the data for this evaluation. In addition, we expect to use statistical data processing and rigorous statistical manipulations of various forms of quantitative data generated from records and files (see data analysis techniques described in Section 2.4). In collecting the quantitative data a Project Management Data System (P:IDS) will be adopted. Its form is similiar to the data system de- veloped by Mr. Austin for the San Pablo Adult Diversion Project. The data system consists of a pre-coded data sheet upon which relevant data items concerning both the project's activities and the character of its clients are recorded. The data sheet is then forwarded to a keypunch facility where the recorded data is transferred to IBM cards for computerization. Once the data has been transferred to magnetic tape and programmed, data can be feed back to the project staff for their use in assessing the progress they are making. The purpose for such feedback to local project staff is to allow project staff to properly analyze how well that project is operating and whom it is serving. Project staff can then make needed adjustments that result from unforseen circumstances. For example, client profiles. may reflect a proportional overrepresenation of white status offenders which may necessitate a reassessment of the selection criteria for eligibility into the project. Examination of termination rates and profiles will allow staff to identify those kinds of youth that seem to be most successful in the project. 00267 a� i 25 EXHIBIT "B" The computerized data system will present data in its simplest form to facilitate coa—munication with the projects. This means that percentage tables and cross tabulations will be the most frequent form of data output and presentation. We will also attempt to process special requests from the projects in terms of analyzing the data. The qualitative or process evaluation of the program will depend upon formal interviews and open-ended informal conversations with relevant actors. Rev erred to as field research, this from of data collection and analysis relies upon the skills of the field observer. When possible and permitted, these field observations will be tape-recorded, transcribed, and filed using an established qualitative data collection format as described by Strauss and Schatzman (1973) and Glazer and Strauss (1967). This form of data included the following types of data and analytical codes: --Observational Dotes--refer to field observations, informal and formal interviews, published or official documents, etc. This category contains the raw, factual field data. --Theoretical Notes--refer to comments.and impressions of a theoretical nature made by the field observer as they relate to potential explanations of the data. They serve to guide the analysis of the raw data. --Plethodolo�ical Notes--refer to comments and suggestions for further research or investigation. They may point to the need for additonal areas or persons to be interviewed, different lines of questioning, or inadequacies of the current research effort. They guide the observer in further data collection tasks. These extensive field notes are produced in multiple copies and filed according to their topical interest. Such data provides a complete- 00268 26 and 'etailed historical or process accounting of how the projects developed over the course of the grant period. The data also assists the quanitative analysis by bringing into focus additional _ factors that irpacted the projects activities and successor fail e. We" VO r EXHIBIT "B" 27 r EXHIBIT "B" 27 Task 2.4--DEIYELOP REPORTING TECH2:IQUES During the planning and initial site visits with project staff and related juvenile justice agencies, coordination of data col- lection procedures will be developed. Also, the selection and training of project data-collectors will be accomplished. Of primary importance will be the availability of computerized data printouts over the entire course of the grant period as generated from the Project Data Management System. The content and structuring of these reporting procedures will be geared toward the needs, interests, and goals of the project staff. The project data collectors will be persons affilitated with the projects in a volunteer or clerical position. We do not wish to take away theyaluable time of professional staff members for the needs of the evaluation. The data collection ins trumente-will ' be constructed in such a fashion that minimal time will be required for their completion. Additionally, the flow of information and re- ports will be analyzed to interface with evaluation information needs. i 3 ` 00270 28 Task 3.0--ASSIST PROJECT STAFF IK TRAINING STAFF IN USE OF VARIOUS DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS Because of the detailed and comprehensive nature of this evaluation proposal it will be necessary for project staff to collect much of the quantitative data to be collected via the Project Management Data System. 31tis will require the research team to spend several days with the project staff in training chosen staff members in the basic skills of coding data. It is anticpated that such staff persons will have a demonstrated interest in research and computer processing. It will provide such individuals with an excellent opportunity to learn such skills and become involved in a major research study. More importantly, this will free the research team from basic data collection tasks and facilitate data analysis and interviewing tasks. The staff person(s) will be required to complete a pre-coded data form for each delinquent entering the project. When completed, the data sheet will be forwarded to the research team for machine processing. The specific rules for coding the data will be carefully explained and demonstrated to staff. During the first week of actaul data collection, the research team will assist staff in coding tasks to ensure the collection effort is being completed. We will also be available throughout the course of the grant for technical assistance in coding procedures. An example of such a data collection sheet to be used in this project in included in Appendix B. • t 0O /1 .a 29 EXHIBIT "B" Task 4.0--REMSE A1- FT-NaIZE THE EVALUATION DESIGN At this stage of the study we will have secured more accurate information about the design and parameters of the deinstitutionalize projects allowing us to refine and finalize the evaluation strategy. We will also be able to determine more accurately the time and costs associated with conducting a complete evaluation study as outlined in this proposal. The final design will be submitted to the Project Director and local project staffs within 45 days following contract execution as requested in the RFP. - i r r 002'2 ' 30 Tas'-; 5.0--CO\DUCT THEEVALUATION The formal evaluation effort will commence by January, 1977 which allows for a two month start-period for the projects. IF this can be accomplished earlier, the evaluation design and data collection forms and procedures will be finalized in accordance with the advanced start-up date. Task PROCEDURES FOR CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTION OF H UUN SUBJECTS These procedures will protect the confidentiality of verbal or written information received from the subjects. The subject should be an informed and active participant in the evaluation process. Subjects used for =:;rmal interviews will informed of the purpose of the inter- view, the potential benefits of the investigation, that the data re- ceived will be for research purposes only; and that the confidentiality of the subject is assured. In addition, the subject will be informed that particpation in the research can be terminated at any time. ' The confidentiality of the subject and data will be achieved through coding procedures and limiting access to master files. Data collection sheets will be stored by the evaluator and indexed by a code number and not by name. Access to the computer storage file will be'restricted using an:access code identification number known only to the Principal Director. The computer file will be destroyed upon completion of the evaluation. Task 5.2--CO_PILE DA%� FOR ANALYSIS AND C(X4PUTER PROCESSING Code sheets will be collected•by the research team on a monthly basis. As data sheets arrive, they will be individually examined for completeness and accuracy. Data will then be keypunched and transferred to magnetic 00273 31 EXHIBIT "B" tape for electronic data processing. Estimated turn-around time for data to become co=pletely computerized from time of reception of code sheets is one week. The data and programming format used be in concert with the software package requirements of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, 1975). This software package includes all of the statistical analyses required for this evaluation (marginals, cross-tabulations, regression analysis, correlations, scattergrams, and discriminant analysis). Qualitative data in the form of transcribed field notes will be stored' in a separate filing system. t 002'74 r{ � � 1 32 Task 6.0--PREP-RE 32.'TERIN PROGRESS REPORTS We will prepare three quarterly reports during the grant period commencing January 1, 1976 in additon to the final evaluation report. These reports will be prepared in several parts-- one part su=mari.zing project activities and initial findings based on the preliminary data available, and the remaining parts describ- ing the progress of the total evalauation effort i.e., unanticipated obstacles to the evaluation, chnages in the evaluation design, expenditures, etc. It is anticpated that the written reports will be accompnaied by an oral presentation of these findings to project staff and the Probation Department. This will serve to keep all relevant parties abreast with the activities and accomplishments of the deinstitutionalization effort. k ;r 3 002'75 a' F, 33 EXHIBIT "B" - i, 33 EXHIBIT ngn Task 7.0--P.IREPARE FPM. REPORT The projects final report will be prepared and submitted to the Prob-ation Department 60 days after the termination of the grant perioc'.. It will be in the fora of a monograph suitable for publication and dissemination. An oral presentation_ will also accompany the submission of the final report.. Although the final repent format will be guided by our actual re- , search experiences, we anticipate that the final report will ; include the following sections: -Literature Review, a concise summary of the relevant literature on status offenses and deinstitutionalization of status offenders. -Description of Research Methodology, a description of the methods employed to evaluate the projects, including- research objectives, key variables and hypotheses to be tested. Research Findings, including recidivism and cost data. -Policy Recommendations, including a description of how the projects met their anticpated goals, proved or disproved the major hypotheses, and a recommendation for continued funding or replication. ra -ooZ76 J r:0J 1.0 K K O Q N Q pK ti p0 sy3 m cu r+i ck P ttt ct-C W. tlS hK t� K f�i GN 0 roO ct ca t4 cs ctY P t,cF m FO's+ W :3 tY" ' Ypw P. t ¢ t ct O 0t Cf- to O in :3 Ir 0 ts aw -ak a ;3 0 ::5 El Ct- N ! W C x ci- Y• 1 aR () d y H N txj t P-3 ---—/ t:j p :U SN K t LAS oa-- cl- .. c CDa a m co O K P. C m Z3 I— c� r• cl CJ7 CD N o t rte.,d - P.: wcD P.p• m OU2r7"'l - 34 EXHIBIT "B" I iV. PERS01?:EI. 34 EXHIBIT "B" W. PERSO\?:£L In this section we will present a brief description of the core research staff that will be primarily responsible for the total evaluation effort. These key evaluators will be charged with evaluation design, data analysis, report writing, and liason duties with project and administrative personnel within the Contra Costa Probation Department. The Principal Investigator, James Austin, will assume overall responsibilty for the direction of the evaluation as well as its general management. He will direct evaluation design, data collection, data analysis and writing of the periodic progress and final reports. Mr. Austin is a sociologist with extensive experience within the criminal justice system as both a practioner and researcher. He is presently involved in the final (and first) evaluation of the San Pablo Adult Diversion Project. He is partic- . ually skilled-in evaluation design, data collection and analysis. The Co-Principal Investigator, Barry lrisberg, Ph.D., will coordinate with the Principal Investiagtor in negotiating and constructing the evaluation strategy during the initial months of the project effort. He will also contribute in the analysis of data as it is processed and in the preparation of periodic progress and final reports. Dr. Frisberg is presently an Assistant Professor at the School of Criminology, University of California, Berkeley. He has particpated in several research and evaluation efforts related to juvenile delinquency. His expertise in this subject clatter coupled with his extensive knowledge of research methods will be a valuable asset to the total evaluation effort. Two part-time Research Associate positions will be filled once the evaluation design has been finalized_ These two associates will work with the senior research staff at the direction of the Principal Investigator, on selected aspects of the evaluation_ It is presently t 002'x$ f j ..,..�. .mss 35 antiepated that these positions will be used to assist in the collection., machine processing, and monitoring of the quantitative data collection system. Referred to earlier as the Project Management Data System (P&-MS) this data set will require constant monitoring to ensure its reliability and validity in generating data necessary for a proper evaluation. The Research Associate positions will be filled by Ph.D. candidate level sociologists or psychologists having extensive background in evaluation studies, Electronic Data Processing (EDP), and the juvenile justice system. It is expected that the individuals for these positions will come from the University of California, Davis or Berkeley campuses. All secretarial and clerical support is included in the indirect cost factor (10% of the total-budget). Individual resumes are included in Appendix A. C 00279 r�. EXHIBIT "B" ORG:k\IZAiION Or THE RESFMCH TEAM Principal Investigator James Austin Co-Principal Invest. Dr. Barry Krisberg Research Associate Research Associate Position Position (to be filled) (to be filled) 00280 r' 36 ' V. ESTDtATED COSTS Thefollowing budget details the specific costs of the proposed evaluation effort based upon a $20,000 ceiling. Individual cost items are subject to negotiation and modification at the request of the Probation Department. I. Personnel Costs Costs A. Principal Investigator, James F. Austin $9,000 (100 days/$90 per diem) B. Co-Principal Investigator, Barry A. Krisberg, Ph.D. (35 days/$90 per diem) $3,150 C. Research Associate Positions (to be filled) (60 days/$50 per diem) $3,000 Total Personnel Days= 195 Total Cost $15,150 II. Travel Costs It is estimated that 5,500 local miles by staff between •I various Contra Costa County locations and Project sites till be required. (@ .15r, per mile and $175 in related per diem expenses). Total Cost $1,000 IIT_. _41sc. Costs A. Typing of final report $ 300 B. Telephone $ 100 C. Xerox and printing costs $ 400 D_ Postage $ 50 E. Computer Core and Keypunching1 $1,000 Total Cost $1,850 00281 -MOONsar.� 37 EXHIBIT "B" _ 37 EXHIBIT "B" IV. T-n direct Costs Refers to related overhead and administrative cost factors such as office supplies, bookeeping, preparation of vouchers and treasury demands, etc. Overhead rate= 107. X $20,000 $2,000 Total Cost $2,000 V. TOTAL EVALUATION COST -$20,000 1Computer costs will cover expenses for computor core and processing time on the University of California, San Francisco main computer. Also included here is a keypunching cost factor. Approximately 1 hour of computer time at $500/hr, is required for the analysis of data. r - 00282 38 APPENDIX A STAFF RESUMES to • t - t ° 00283 EMIBIT "Bn E!(HIBIT nBn JKMES F. AUSTIN 2049 Oak Street, #1 San Francisco, California 94117 (415) 3S7-6145 Born: July 18, 1948 Marital Status: Married, no children EDUCATION . . ;. A.B. (Sociology), 1970, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois M.A. (Sociology), 1974, DePaul.University, Chicago, Illinois Ph.D. program (Sociology), 1975 - present, University of California, Davis HONORS 1974 Graduated Cum Laude (with distinction) 1974 Pi Gamma Mu (National Social Science Honor Society) RESE4RCH AND 1•:ORK EXPERIMICE 1976 - present Co-Director, Santa Clara County Jail'Study Responsible for development of jail personnel and inmate attitudinal survey instruments; data collection; data analysis; preparation of final report. 1975 - present Project'Evaluator, San-Pablo Adult•Diversion'Project Responsible for evaluation design, development o computerized data system; data collection; data analysis; technical assistance to project staff; preparation of quarterly and annual reports. 1975 Research Associate, National Council"on Crime'and Delinquency, Marin County Correctional Project Responsibilities included development of evaluation. design; collection of data; preparation of final report. 1974 - 75 Research'Associate; NCCD, California'Technical Assistance and Support Project Responsibilities included provision of technical assistance to local projects, regional criminal justice planning agencies, and state Office of Criminal Justice Planning; development of management data system; design of individual and program-level evaluation strategies. 00281 AUSTIIA'/2 1972 - 74 Correctional'Sociologist, Illinois Department of Corrections, Stateville Correctional Center kesponsibilities included preparation of diagnostic and summary reports on inmates appearing before the Illinois Parole and Pardon Board; membership on the inmate griev- ance board, assignment committee, and disciplinary com- mittee; design and implementation of related research projects as assigned. 1972 Consultant; -DuPage County Juvenile Probation Department, Juvenile Detention Center Responsible for diagnostic sociological evaluations of detained juveniles awaiting detention and adjudication hearings forcourt disposition. 1970 - 72 Correctional Sociologist; Illinois'Department'of Corrections, Joliet Correctional Center Responsibilities included preparation of diagnostic and summary reports; supervision of inmate caseload; member- ship on inmate grievance review board, assignment com- mittee, and disciplinary committee. PUBLICATIONS "The Parole and Pardon Board: Decision Making in the Criminal Justice System." DePaul University, Masters Thesis, 1974. With Barry Krisberg, 'The Children'of'Ishmael: 'Critical'Petspectives'on Justice, Mayfield Press, an press. PROFESSIO\AL AFFILIATIONS American Society of Criminology, Western Division, (Treasurer, 197S-76) Association of Criminal Justice Researchers Illinois Academy of Criminology OOMJ f EXHIBIT "Bn Curriculxi Vitae: Ba.*'tf �:??n nrisbarg Born: ::ay 10, 194' 5; Brooklyn, flew York etarried, no children Rcma address: 1732 Grant Street Berkeley, California 9=:703 Fsone: (1.15) 5113-9957 E!3JC TON B.A. (Sociology). 1967, Oniversity of Pennsylvania ii.A. (Criminology), 1953. University of Pennsylvania Ph.D. (Sociology), August 1971, University of Pennsylvania A:AMS : N=ational Defense Education Act Title IV Fellowship 1967-70 T?iC Ti's 3.ZP_--RIEFCE 19'9-70 Teaching Assistant (Statistics), Graduate School of Arts and Science, University of Pennsylvania 1970-71 Instructor (Sociology), College of General Studies, University of Pennsylvania 1970-711 Lecturer (Sociology), Haverford College 1971 - _assistant Professor, School of Criminolomr, University of California, Berkeley, California a P.=SE:RCH E:CPMTTEYCE 1957-70 Research Assistant. Crime Cozmission of Fhiladelphia 1970-71 Director of Stuff, with Marvin tJolfgaag. "Evaluation of Urban Leader- ship Train_no Prooraa" funded by 2,TIi•;Fi. 1971, Consultant, California Youth authority on Dukes. Dukes and Associates, "Co.—unity Crime Abatement" 1974 Research Director for U.R.S_A.; "Exemplar,{ Projects" for t3.I.L-2.C.J- of Lac; Liforcement dssistance Administration C7 19T* Principal Investigator, Pilot Stuff of Citizen Participation in_. 'Criminal Justice for San Diego Regional Criminal Justice -Planning Board 00285 147. 7 f f ±i -, +s.. .,y. :..: ! Mr.,.:,... <Y.: „..,.. .+-; _w.. .ro• ...'^"., a .+.. np.-+a4, ,,. .� ^rr .2{ k „ ?::,, it�T_S3�'y r /2 1975 Senior Rcsea-reh Associate ::CCD Rtescarch Centcr, Davis, California. Designing 3valuatioz System for Office of Crininal Justice Planning 1970' Lead Consultant in Area of Delinquency Prevention to National Task Force cn Ju-jenile Justice PjET-i t T iQVS "Urb_-i Leadership Training: A Study of 22 Gang Leaders," University of Penn- sylvania, Dissertation 1971. "?risoa Legal Libraries: A Criminologist's Vied" in Prison Leal Libraries: idea into Remits-, School of Librarianship, University of California, Da-leley, April 1972.- esviea of Humphries' Tearoem Trade in Issues in Criminology, Winter 1972. "?rediction in Criminology: An Appraisal of Research Methods" in Dec. and Jan. 1973-74 Quaterri di Criminologia Cl.inica. "The Sociological Imagination Revisited" in Canadian Journal of CrL-Iinologgy and Corrections, April 1974- _ "Gang Youth and Hustling: The Psycholoa of Survival" in Issues in Crimin- 2i , Spring 1974 j The Politics of Delinquency Prevention: The Case of the Urban Leadership Training Pro=ra-i" in Social Policv. July - August 1974. „ "Teaching the Ne-w Criminology", Crime and Social Justice, Fall 1974. Review of H.P. newton and E. Erikson, In Search of Common Ground, in Issues in Crininolo..,r. Fall 1974• Tae Ganz and the Co=unity: An Ethnographic Study of 22 Gang Leaders, a mo oorarh, R and E Raseai:ca associates, 1975. Cri-e and Priv?eze: Towards a Ilea Criminolomr, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- F.---U (Spectrum Saries), 1975. Nita Paul Takagi, "Ethical Issues in Evaluating Criminal Justice D---monstra- tion Projects" in Reidel and Chappel (e3.). Evaluatinz Criminal Justice Proara::s, I:ew York: Praeger, 1975. Review of Howard Zinn, Justice in Ever'rda-r Life, in 14111 Magazine, 1975. "Controversy and Diversity in Criminology." Review Essay of four new texts in Contnporary Sociolo,r, in press. Nith James Austin, The Children of Ishmael: Critical Perspectives on Juve- nile Justice, Mayfield Press, in press. 148. 00287 48. 00287 EL EXHIBIT "B" Prevention of aelin:3aency." three chapters in a forthcoring report of a `�► 1:_._enai Task Force on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. C^ar._e, tae Jails, D---pHlet for the A.C.L.J-, in press. 1. Initiated a series of Nethodolo� courses at grad and under-rad level. In tsie immediate two years before I arrived the methods training did n of neet faculty approval. For example, many senior grad students felt that they had virtually no training in research methods. _he follo:rinZ is a list of the Methods Courses which I developed and offered. Basic Crlminolooical Research Cperation Crim. 130 I nt=r,3uction to Iethods Crim. 230 :advanced Quantitative Methods Cria. ?_31 Froale-ms of Historical Method Crim. 290 Research in Ethnic Communities Crim. 298 dial=ration Research Crim. 132 2. 1 have supervised 40-50 students in 197 or 193 Independent Stud Courses. 3. -T have taught (i-:inter 1972) a graduate course in criminology to proba- tion officers in Alameda County. 4. 1 participated in Summer Institutes to increase ninority participation in graluate education. CCr_ ff-f S aVICS 1. Sawed on State—wide co=aittee to improve Criminal Justice Planning for California Council on Criminal Justice. 2. G_ganizzd students to aid Sheriff of San Francisco Co. to develop a classification system for jail. 3. Consultant to Chinatown Youth Service Center, San Francisco. 4. Consultant to Cormunity Concern 113. a black cocnunity organization in rh?ad iphia. 5. invited to attend conference in Boston on closing of Institutions in :_assaczusetts to share implications and strategies with Jerome Miller, CC'.• issiciner of Lill.* Aict.s. S. ic? F_tisil-!nt, Boar•i of Directors and Program Chairman of Berkeley- Services. erkeleyServices. 149. 00285 F?GFc3SiC_:n'_. AFFILIATIC:'S .Leser 5 xn Saciolo;scab. Association - Crimirolo7 Section Aver icon Sociat r of CriminoloZ.5r Contr ibtAin4 :tutor to Crir.e and Social Justice President of taes.turn Division or A-m rsean Society of Criminalozy Referea for Journal of Research on Crime: and Delinuttency 2tc woe:, Editorial Board of Grfendler ?ehabilitation eye y 00289 150. ORm EXHIBIT "B" j 4% mpf"MR—MM W. • EXHIBIT "B" 45 APPEIMM B DATA COLLECTION SHEET (San Pablo Adult Diversion Project) t l 00290 Zi.-T .975 =1= 11 Sso.ECT IF- E)(f(I BIT "B" t. i 22. F.IC...m O Genee 4 A.A. 2, C-nz-_(S) C- ?_3?S - 1 C-En I bachelors . 2 High School o F'aatem •39 :thee Scheel 7 Doctorate 9 9 Other (specify) r- t o i' (bail on vast ZZ nontha) Z (include public ass!stance) 9 10 t 40 41 42 F 241. OFUIBLIC Y.on••R:.^I.^idxC'_ T 'AT A�. , F]i 1.:• tI 1 Self 4 2 D-p!ndents only 43 3. I:vY3=-4 VA C-??��;�LRZS C :.•:"..;i �, 3 Self and Crptnden:s j13 'F 9 Other (specify) 25. DRU5 USAGE DIFFICULTIES 1� 1 Interpersonal Difficulties �1 2 Irgftl Difficulties (pzst or present) F 5. ti`_g? Co PR=t J'r it 3 Current Case-P.elated Difficulties lao:r ca:r_^ISS 6 Co�lnatton I and 2 5 Combinatlon 1 and 3 6 Ccabtnation 2 and 3 6. 2.L^+.3 c=:3IC3 A7.ILT 9 Combination (speccify)2 and 3 lil3^_'`r4vC3 C0.�7i�a'^ICXi X10-1 26. ALC.75OL 1S:.GS DU?ICULTTES O Corn: 1 Interpersonal Difficulties 7. 1>.TMw4 C,-7RIC3=MT 2 I&rftl Difficulties (past or present) 45 I:i7SC9 SY'27CS 3 Current Case-Related Difficulties k Coxbinatlan 1 and 2 5 coabination I and 3 8. MTS:?O,Ju-m%= 6 Cucbtnation 2 and I F RMAiCY 03.^_r'A=!'•A71O:r! 7 Combination 1, 2 and 3 0 None 9 Oth!r (specify) 1 Yes 10 9 us}3nt'wft 27. SCR_E tIM CQ ITW DISPOSITION 1 E11P.ible 4 ]PC 1 Restriction m Not F11-lble 5 ]PC 1000 Lr..6J r�7J 9. AGS AT Fl?ST AD=, jLROC:ST W". a :e nous rise 6 DA Veto F �(exclude traffic violations) 3 Alcoholic R7strictton 7 Excess Crim Kist 8 Nepative Deaeanor 10. Szxi Ida^:mss(-- 'v-mr 4 5 1. In Death 28, SC?� DISPOSITIGN DATE 2. Vie?este-3erul.!r g Z'i Injur7 3: =ate-:le-l'••inlent-No inju-v zi no dry yr Lk 1"T-Caiole^.t lex C/fease m m l:a �9 5. :o:ics-Sale 8� Pr=perty Gffenseless than $100) H r_o?ert7 C_'fe:3e �rore than or equal to !100) 9. Other (specify) 11. Cocplaint:Sled- 0 No, 1 Yea 29. I El gible Til DISPCSITUnw 1 Eligible 3 l(nx1111nK to Participate Not rllgtble k Charges Dropped 50 12. F- r�aII�Ea Appear 5 A Plead Guilty 2. iac,c i.SF d7 9. G:.er (apeelfy) 30 STAFF I..ZER4IEl DATE no day yr Si 52- 13. szx 1. ?Ole 0 EEMM 2. Fede <. 31. AID ASSIGN!R...'+rf 1k. n:= r n� 1 Experlm!ntsl =0 dti 53 Y_ t---r-� ;zm 2 Control El W ELI m m z5 co r 32. naTr OF nzsreslTlott no day 15. Lw:G^ 1:i e�sx�C'Pr�rT"...`�C•'. � m m � 55 5 (in r�:nths) 16. .'C'Lcrml-, S_A^u 27 23 27: E=n1o�-d Not Z=lovean 33. L„AL DISPOSITIONS 0?ALL CASES 2. - =* . ..ue LJ (use code) 2. 6. P.eti-+d 30 stu.ent part-tip 7. Disabled stu3ent (r_ll tim) 8. stolon: - 3%. DAS3 C!7ntSTCC7.Af--- Ai.D3 r•7M 17. GCCU?n=i.Y (erecLfy) L L ) r : TPl�'!:'Ti CCSB' 11�1L�1LJI JS J2 eo day r 59 6o 61 4'. Sales t 1, La�orer Cr !Zut•:aZea: 5. areae__ r 2. T4a1!e3-man of ei+=7. 6. Pmp!etor fJ) 35. T'y-.::..'R." C?Z.A_�CC:^:.CTS tL1.F 11 {spec• _ ATS-:TrATiGr F?:4 AID b2 0) 19. MART-AL s:=.- E 35. •m_rm.n-a C?accts n•_CL*-. 1. Sir 1e-"•r_.=srried t. i?.i(er} n AT^y?:!i a:IC]F?OH AM 2. Far:Sed 5 ��;.:.-a: U •• 3. c=--wtal 5, Divorce: 9. Ct`.er (ap:cify) 37. I=C?_."_. .EAR-1-M:3IIy AZZ-X.""1. TO AI7. 0 Ohne k A.A. 1 C••J' S lachelors 65 r^. - --� '- - - - _ 2 Elgin '-l:o�l '•a�Cers Z :R•. i7' 7 Zcctirat- - 00291 -- -; m E^^Iny.1 Nnt E^o]nved 40 on 67 2 F'.11-:ice 6 Retired m 3 Student (rart-tine, 7 Disabled I. Student (full-tine) 8 Student 70 71 CO:."IC:ZC-:; CICS ^4:D (use code) - y-. aSPACE YEE411 GROZS 1GlAYz (include public assistance) 72 7J #. SS, P::H:..L ASSISTAICCE IJ 0 Nave - 1 Sett Only 2 Dependents Only 74 75 3 Self and Dereneents 9 Other ts,ecify) 1 2 3 1 56. OCCUPA?10:1 (specify) -45 L!• Ln. PPP-'Ic— n -Olt c ri'�RGia! 1 Enrlm:e E I.e�al 2 Eo�ca:!an. 7 Ls"giryc 57. HICPEST DEGREE£AkrEi/ 7 4etic1l a Fences! Healti 0 honr t A.I.. 4 vocat!cral 9 Other (srrciyl 1 CED 5 Bachelors 47 2 Mich School 6 Masters Service Agency Code Hrz, 3 Trade School 7 Doctorate 9 Other (=,cify) t-�L�111 7 A 9. 58. ARRESTS DI:R1I:G !Oi.(.Ctt-UP PERIOD (•::.e code) - _11-12 11-3 It,J �T.F•� 11 II � ti• t7 1C 19 a ) 21 22 23 n `9. COR tr;^;[ : I sRIKG FCLIDY-Ul' PERIOD fsste en?:) W. MSQ`I ;C!: A!'.1 i:?S I'LtTI0 1 f i t 1 Suecessful 1_l 2 L'rsutaetsfc:-A�inisra'Sve P.eaovat 25 :s. •J 3 L'nsuee.safu:-A:-est Renoval E t Unsucces.-:'Ul-Ca,v?:iia Re=vol 5 Crsucc_ssful_�elr Pemoval 5%L7 9 Other (specify) -- TWELVE MJYfH r-'(r1.L0'J_gY 0 6C. EPFIOYWErr STATUS s' Ei 01.v.d Pott ts,d o7ed —1-art-Tine S, AL')�- "•f 2 no!]-Time •-- }; r r �•: 3 Stu-lent (part-tI7.0 7. Lis+rle1 b Student (full:iso) LI Studer, walx e•'. ret - loaed n tart .(-e - .�a�e 2 --,al-=!vt C Let!red Soffit�1_ ? �:ss�led 61, AVERAGE WEEKLY GPCSS IN1:OsJ.-: r Stu•:e. �; ..':.•'-aa: (include public assistarcel O Xoze r Sties 62, PUBLIC ASSISTANCE (� 1 n9orer o: _irsleat v ::azs?er a 0 Kone i 2 ^'tda"tn cr ec•_i:alent " cprletor r► r. 1 Self Only 11ZZ Cltr!cal ° ftsslo:al EE 2 trpendents Only 9 C:F.er (sp a!r,j i 3 Self and Decendenty } � 9 Other (specifyl ;:l" 5: _1i'm ..r. ) 63. OCCUPATION (s Ery) Pe t 61 64 O 'lone 6A, HIC-nrm DzuEE EAP.-(_D 1 SeIr J:lg 0 Kon. A A.A. 2 LeyenEe::(s) C:tly ...iii 1 GED S Bathelors n5 3 Self ns: rpen!en:: 2 High School 6 Phsters n �:ttr (iptel!;j 3 Trade Schtoo1 7 Doctorate 9 Other (specify) 65, ARRESTS I1gP.Ir.G FOLi.O'.Y UP (use code) �J =2 day yr L1J CL- m r » .�•- �o tt n _7V 71- _t'z<_f1Cac: : ':h ror_rz: 72 73 p E6. corr'crimts.D.:PS-.:: a!1vo - sP --- -- --- 00292 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Agreement with Tommy C. Angove and Associates for Consulting Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Tommy C. Angove and Associates for consulting services in.connection with the preparation of the environmental impact report for Subdivision 4879 in the Alamo area at a cost not to exceed $3200, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the _ minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori F,: Planninf; Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: Supervisors Tommy C. Angove and Associates of fixed this30tb ` Director of Planning day of November 19 75 County Auditor-Controller County Administrator , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By :'�_:•, -:Z.i ' Deputy Cleric rta � CraW 00293 H-24 3174S Ism CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT I. Special Conditions. These special conditions are incorporated below by reference: (a) Consultant's Name and Address: Tommy C. Angove and Associates, 1609 Oak Park Boulevard,Pleasant Hill, CA 94523. (b) Effective Date: November 23, 1976 (c) Project Name, Number and Location: Environmental Impact Report for Subdivision 4879,"The Creeks of Alamo", Diablo Homes, Inc. (d) Payment Limit: Three Thousand Two Hundred Dollars($3,200.00). 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the p ' ent hereto: CO TY OF CONTRA COSTA C= Bd7h!ai�rman, . P. Kenny By. dof signate o icial capacity i usiness Supervisors /Tommy C. Ahgove (Pr cipai ) ATTEST: J. R. OLSSO (CORPORATE SEAL) County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board State of California ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By: ' ,t The person(s)signing above for Consultant, known eput ary o to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknow- Re mended ledged that he/they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. ntho A.Dehaesus' 1 Date: �1 irectfir of Planning Form approved: Notary Public John B. Clausen County Counsel Le --------.-"----- � ' !101"Muuy • _ E. D.OS NIENOW N: = ro OTARY VUA[IC CAUfORN ByCOU- y OF COUTRA COSTA- Deputy U1 C..-.-.W."uwh 2.1%* �1111111g1{/1 j„u1U121 W.2 111111111in"81111111110 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County and the above-named �ultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. County hereby employs Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of Service shall be as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to the County, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to the County of (a) public liability insurance of at least $500,000.00 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000.00 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $500,000.00. Thirty days' notice to County of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. The County shall pay Consultant for professional services performed as follows: A. For preparation of the Draft Environmental Imapact Report a fee not to exceed I(d) above. (i) The first installment, in an amount to be determined by the Director of Planning of not more than 50%nor less than 30%of the fee noted in 7.A.above, shall be paid after receipt by the County of the"Working Draft" report. 00294 Ncrofi!med ;vitFt board order 1 ' (ii) The second installment, constituting the remainder of the fee noted in 7.A. above,shall be paid after the Director of Planning receives and finds acceptable the"Final Consultant Droft". B. Ten percent (10%) of all charges billed by the Consultant shall be withheld until final acceptance of the Final Environmental Impact Report by the appropriate hearing body or until authorized by the Director of Planning,whichever comes first. C. The fees specified in Section 7.A. include all overhead and incidental expenses for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the fee limit specified in Section I(d) without prior written approval of the County. 8. Termination. At its option, County may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination Consultant agrees to deliver to the County everything pertaining to the work in the possession of Consultant or under its control at that time, and will be paid, except as provided below, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due for services rendered to the date of termination. If the Consultant is in default at the time of termination, County may complete the work (scope of service) and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the fee and from any funds otherwise due and payable to the Consultant. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not to be considered an employee of the County. 10. Exclusive Services. Consultant agrees to restrict its firm and its subcontractors from any employment, other than for the County, in -any way pertaining to the subject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment. Consultant further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with is subcontractors. 11. Status of Product. It is understood that the Final Consultant Draft accepted by the County will be utilized as background or source material by the Planning Department for its exclusive use, all or in part, as it sees fit. The Consultant agrees not to release, disclose or otherwise make available copies of its written documents, their contents, any views or opinions contained therein, or any other written or oral material, data, views, opinions or other information in any way arising out of or connected with the subject of this employment to other than the Planning Department without first'obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such disclosure. Attachments: Appendix A i I 0029 7 APPENDIX"A" Consultant shall prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Report in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and County guidelines for the project specified in I(c)of this agreement. The report shall be prepared in the format specified by the County. It shall be single spaced and suitable for duplication by office copier methods. The Consultant shall prepare the report in a"working draft" form initially and submit three (3) copies for Planning Department review. The "working draft" shall be submitted by Consultant to the Planning Department no later than twenty-five(25) calendar days after the date Consultant is authorized by the Planning Department to proceed with preparation of the report, unless approval of extension of such deadline is given by the Director of Planning. After Planning Department reviews and comments on the draft, the Consultant shall revise the working draft report in accordance with such comments and submit one copy suitable for duplication and distribution of the"final Consultant draft" for review and acceptance by the Planning Department. The"final Consultant draft'shall be submitted by Consultant to the Planning Department no later than one week after return of the edited working draft to Consultant by the Planning Department unless approval of the extension of such deadline is given by the Director of Planning. In no event shall the time for completion of the process described in this paragraph extend beyond May 6, 1977 without written approval of the Director of Planning. Consultant shall as part of the contractual obligation assist County in the preparation of responses to comments on the draft EIR for the purpose of producing a"Final EIR" for the project. Assistance of County staff required by the Consultant in the gathering of data to complete this report shall be limited to the supplying of source documents on County premises. No compiling of data will be done by County staff. All other County staff support effort will be limited to that specifically enumerated below: None. i i 00295 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Contract ;22-064 with Richard L. Sweet, H.D. for medical staff training IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following Short Form Service Contract: ]\'UMBER: 22-064 CWTRACTOR: RICHARD L. SWEET, H.D. TER--: November 22, 1976 (one day only) PAYMENT LIMIT: $150 DEPARTMENT: Health SERVICE: Professional In-Services Training "Pelvic Inflammation Diseas-eAnerobic Bacteria in the Vagina" for Health Department medical staff FUNDING: 1002 donation from UPJOHN Pharmaceutical Company PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and tha Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 30th day of November . 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor County Health Department By e2.rs. Deputy ClarSc :,ry Cr3 0029'7 BEJ:dg �1 ...r., ,i'.. tth -..r^ a..:'..;`.;, M .... _-.1.. . . ` . ... ..x...$3."K^•..aX;'.�'-' ...sx...ui' ?ai...._ r_f.'. ;.r:i"-9':e�4 xienry� ' Contra Costa County Standard Form SHORT FORK SER►'ICE CONTRACT 1. Contract Identification. Number 22 - 06 Department: Health Department Subject: Professional In-Services Training Series, "Pelvic Inflammatory Disease-Anerobic Bacteria in the Vagina" for Richmond Health Department Medical Staff 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Richard L. Sweet, M.D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 311 Blackfield, Tiburon, California 94920 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is 11-22-76 and it terminates 11-22-76 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day advance written notice thereof to the Contractor, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 150.00 6. Countv's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 150.00 per service unit: (00 session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in "Pelvic Inflammatory Disease- Anerobic Bacteria in the Vagina" for County-selected persons on November 22, 197 in the time, place and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least one (1) full hour of such services. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By✓ J. P. Kenny By LIA C.0Wlrrnon, Board of S:.,p , ; ;5 Designee Recommended by Departure (Designate official capacity) By ���?9Q Designee (Form approved by County unse (A-4620 7/76) Microfilm-zd board order w I� i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 1976 In the Matter of - Submittal of the November Draft Contra Costa County Solid Waste management Plan as approved by this Board to the State Solid Waste Management Board. This Board and a majority of the cities within the County which contain a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the County have approved the November 1976 Draft Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan as approved by this Board on November 9, 1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Chairman James P. Kenny is authorized to execute a letter of transmittal and forward the Plan, as required, to the State Solid Waste Management Board. BE IT FURTHER ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to transmit certified copies of documents evidencing city action on the Plan to the State Solid Waste Management Board. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept.: Public Works Dept. Witness my hand and the Sea[of the Board of Environmental Supervisors Control affixed this]0thday of November • 19 76 cc: Public Works Director Environmental Control State Solid Waste J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Mariaement Board ByAi Deputy Clerk The Interim Policy Body �,. Mary Dunten Jean L M!A County Administrator 00299 H-N 3/7615m f� f� p[+xny Alt". �k yY3.+r-��'}4 �"'�'` '�ts�"�'^a2+a Sof 3k'r�� F�� 6y�'y+� �i�yg �� ''."t n�kt ps€��!!•, ���i3S i! I'�¢ —_ "Z -- iuri , yt` y4 a0, -- P f fez < 3k*c t{ fi s ; c + �:ri �•+ �' d x s � - :ti� r, _ v 3'^t r� :�.as '€ +r,.sm x � S; vs. ♦ x ��, '�-+�,* ,r _ °-VT s. `<.F� r -*� t'" art a t h. s h xa =rr. � a:i� 5�.: i•t � :: �rri +file tk � <a. "�,r '6 " '�d�'`w��r� -i I M tg� "'x'ya � 1u^t^a,�.�,?r �'��°^." �,•i`�"s�"� :� ^ale tip" e �t - b' f y r^' k£+w fit,a• k"'-A""�'S`6 - 2`4sa ?.2.aya�,m'f `. `- � i,y S - "#,; 'a:S T � �� .m"ir fi 'R "++r + 1� •+; "� r'*` ,�� -spa fozm �s Ato be coar�leted and su2imtted�with�t*ne So2zd krste"`t'asta event y �_ �x �-_ +'qf�-.' r `'R""'1".5 2 �''s-•C Y,p X ,e3,.' ;'y,. . t 3 1D rCCOIf.@IICe,�hlt}1�.r+2C.t1aa715 _ rtmct ,S e n <� fi r y U- � 2— -,g — +s. '��,� '""<; "x t ��'r^R„$s •c+i 't s '`"s•".4 �•r"„' "'' [a' 1)�°�t°Ysnner}`by�"�rihiCh.Cita,eS;���C2al�T�.strs�cts� Oth�es'. ��'iva,,.,,. nom. ,,, .k".�,aa-ttdekW, ars Tf' ^�•k-AsE`C,vn--�...rr �za.^.,,� a�r�s x ��r.� - k -NGovernaeAtal �urisdactians, Prsvate�Solid»�k'a�st _ 'Si 5a y s4+n� � 4 x t! dLSt2]� aAd the pa& C Pa _.]aClpatCa epaiing - S.`�a s x° '.r.,. 's a"S"1f a„d �� � �'� X� � >a��,„Z)���,,;Y.ztbocs 1sed'zto Infoxm the"Pob11 �"Duan „•B1aA - aw to m _*`n nevelopment- (171JI and R4) v��a �2 Sr+ �° " �;,§`C"}°.,. �'v,y"`�t y#'��',`*.,f"�r"'r..,*a #"{a �w: n^ �£iii�',F �4+ �,�a»,rr• �9. �u}.*" - '��` �f, it ,•"�; -- ," =:�'fiR"'074 atibality o£the�lan� r n - 4 � WN"Nxey fY, rat .t1q*"'}.�f`r�.z'^� ''�:i 3,r. r rst '"�iw C':fi. r. w x-xv Yr .a+ ^ty r+ ¢ i;• (a) Compatlbalat}k�.-ith xuDtyxgenezal plan i17141aand�*38)' �" - +'' - ����� t�}n peer� :'�"�'�at,� *t.tre�a '����f�'�: s ��^..�. �": tic;M�-Et '*a-•~tr.'�,"�xr�.��t�rw�:m.. �"'x�ar� � -W ��-. k - �`� s (b), greementof local 3unsdaCtzoa - a`�'°,�• �, x� 2Yi- tz.t k ' Ian supersedes play o local6onrss€dtction ro�`'s+'�.a, .' "aZ� .� , FC R * " , „ j ,;5« 4*9 ' < °tic) tecogaataoD ofCOr.j7r-eheDsive��tez ity x� -�s�.�^,y�^�� `rOoAtmlPlaa i171+i1C anti.9I) } ��r x '' *Aa +*• 3m+"`. ML'c3`Yrs.; tiw�"..."�.: 'f -•;,..z'w.ttt'�*�-.4 � ci `fi ,y� a'r � M �� � i� L�,� J id) pgnitaoA of,the State�3mplemeatatioaMV �lan� =k' � � �71Chievinq aAd Y.aanta,•,•�q the ttatoDal _ s�"ri JT ",° k �i "�§T�"€ .t��sN:v rL>t•r.�w,a � r9 a^ozrias jyr9' ,II71rt4IC.+.,a,,nd1 k Kbent'��Aar„ ld - s,+�' y'i 4„���.:+f Wh'' `�ig8 "�L.}q�°'`Y M .fib t• 5 ��m „. #� 5 y,yr � ±T-,�i'; t:i`t.+^y,�»z, vet; .-x'�' �.`."` b:.�X r" !t,•*4 »a `?�. _ _ — ,�;. .� .. "is-r `d,.uNr,..•� `' �,`�'�,M a�"�,�+4)z��T�EY1eL.���910I1aI�.Plann�9{A�CC)►�' � a�`r�r �� �� ON'a4' �����'��r'..��",�`�7.v �� s',(* - fa) Attach a of coa�entsreceiveselatiroe-to - ( 21S r� q �pY " iy raw _ WAVE, ��'"�°�- ';"$the��ze2amanazy€dZaftzdDd"ti�le�e.3IIC0 p tC g 5 w x zw -nom^' + >' the flan, note the#pa55 ges°�Sa theIaaePo (17150) }P X `k. a . i s a {h) mPmposed final plan;submitte&to Iaeg2oDa2 'laDDZAg� - n t gm 1w'aaa to � � (Note date of submittal) �.- w Novi S 37 '� 1 `k.ay,'� s 4 y r � aM �^�' 3 �a a -,p,.s a•'y `�'`.v ' r tem' k -Ma # t t • k DP.IIdtCSSection m'ui6eic ,Cdllfci =ve coce T B 4 Y2S1 `a 7"'Chapl 2 aA`d zefezence sauabers corxesp==ng toy thoses�usedt to den xpolicaesaaad objectives n,,, e�State,-.pblicy� as Solid Waste Yana"meat- 'd vy.c •`' �' AF is c � t 'k 3'¢�,k���"...�,dr+ �y a'++ec�Y €>., ,fit .� _ A"'R 5 � { � 00300 (a) C::-v =2se-:-tio_ns of Approval. (17152) (Late whet%er attached or specify.paw -%=ber - if enezese,4 the pia:.) _ _ . . . . _ _ .. . . . . . . Attached and to i be Forwarded (b) R=esical tabu:atiors showing eonfor ance to i city concLrerce requirer-ents. (17152) . . _ . . . . . . . Not Applicable' CO City notifications of disapproval_and statement of i reasons. (17152) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . Attached 6) Consideration of Azeawiee solid haste Panagement Systesas. •(17170 and A5) . • (a) Coordination with contiguous counties (A5). - ... ._ : III-2 ' (b) Elimination of barriers to interju_-isdictionar f flow.of solid wastes (33) _ - _ - _ _ - . VI-3 7) Solid Waste xPinagement objectives and Masures to Achie-,e Objectives " (a)" Shozr-term- (17171)_ . Chapters IZ, - -IV, VII, VII J (b) Pledium-term_ (17171) . _ _. _._. ) IX, XII-3, (c) Long-tensa-- (17171) B) Identification of Existing and Future Solid Wastes. (17172) (Types, locations, characteristics, quantities and fluctuations). (a) General wastes - household, commercial, 'institutional, agricultural, recreational, construction and demolition, sewage residue, street sweepings, etc_ (17172a)... .- .. .. V-1,5 `. t (b) Special wastes - .autos, -tires..-bulky items and wastes • ' in the form of liquids, semi-solids, slurries disposed of in solid waste disposal -systems. (17172b).- . _. -V-5 CO Litter_ (17172x) .. _ _ _ . ..._ - - V-5. (d) 71a:ardous wastes. (171724 and A6)_ _ .. V-4 (e) Domestic animal.-wastes- (17172e) .- _. _ - . _. _ V-5 (f) ihstes to be disposed of outside county- (17172) .- .- _..: V-1,4 _- = 00301 ------.�.,::ter. ... •�x�..i. .:�.a..� Y.ttir'i?•. ... :..-r.. ,.,�,c'•... ., .., .,r t.._....a.+..an. q ....._•wd#.Xaylk .� ....... ......:...�.: - Awa i an= C e.—.t Oneratio^.s (a; locaticn and description of solid waste facilities including processing, transfer and disxsal facilities, resource recovery operations and secondary raterials' industries. (17173 &::d *D5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .V-1,2 (b) Estimate current degree of resource recovery in county_ (17173). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .V-1-3 10) Stora:e of Wastes for Collection i. VII-3; VIII-11; (a) criteria for storage_ (17174). . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .XII-2; (b) Ordinances needed_ (17174a). . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .VIII-10 XII-2 i4 (c) Incorpnoration of storage facilities by t developers_ (17174b) _ . . . _ _ . . . . _ . . . . .VII-3 e (d) Hazardous and toxic waste storage_ (17174c). •.VII-5,6;VIII-11•,12 XII-2• 1 (e) Program for modification of existing inadequate storage VII-3,4;. VIII-10,1 provisions. (17174d) . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XII,-Z' t. 11) Collection System - (a) Consideration of all factors relating to collection of { solid wastes necessary to achieve cocplete and viable ! • c - collection-programs. (17175x)_ _ _ V-1 (b) Stipulation of minimum removal frequency. (17175b) .-VII-3,4,'VIII-5 i 11..' -1) ,'regulations governing collection frequencies. (17175b)_ _ _ - .. _ . .:VII-3,4=11-5,11 -2) Subareas of different collection frequencies. V-1,VII4 i (c) Listing of: 1) collection services. (17175c). . V-1 f 2) Charges and fees. (17175c) - - - V-1 _ 3) Standards of service. -(17175c) _ - V-1 --- (d) Secognition and treatment of problems of dissimilar _ collection services. (17175c). . . . . . . VII-4; VIII 5,11 - - - - - 3. 00302 " _ r ZCGVe:j• -- .'�� __•...SSS:'_ _- .'as:es ' (a) Materials and/or enerT recovery sys:e: (17176a and Dl) _ _ . . - -_ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . . _ VI-4 to 10 (3) Analysis of resource recover, program*. (17176a and DI) _ . _ . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . 1) if none are feasible, state season_ (17176a and D'_)__ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not applicable 2) Show that regional programs were considered. - (17176a and D1) _ _ . . . . . . _ . _ _ .. _ . . . _ . . V-1,2; VI-2,3 (c) Provision of necessary volumes of-wastes to maintain feasibility of existing or planned resource recovery Facilities. VI-2 (d) Consideration of source separation program and/or i. deposit centers for recyclable saterials. (17176a and D1) _ .. _ _ _ _ . VII-1,2,5 (e) Provision for periodic review of.'the state of the art"_ (17176a). _ _ _ _ _ _ . I-1; ,VIII-5; XII-1= (f) Comparison of costs of disposal site operations with* _ costs of resource recovery options. (17176a and D1). _ . .V-1,2 (g) Summary of processing, disposal and resource recovery facilities proposed for short-ter=, medium-terra and _long-term periods. •(17176b)_ .. _ . . . . . . _ - _ _ _Chapter VI, XII-3 I' (h) Analysis of co=ounity growth pattens for possible VII-8,9; Appen- conflicts-with proposed solid waste facilities. (88) :alk•B.: : (i) General location and description of disposal sites - '- included in Plan. (17176c) _ 1) Projected volumes, sources and types of ~castes for each disposal site. .(17176c) - - i 2) Standards of design and operation of disposal VII-8,9; VIII-10 sites. (17176c). . _ - - -. » » --- - - . -. .. .'to=2, 7(II-2-. i 3) Potential use of coaoleted disposal sites_ - V-]: VII-8,9; 1 (171760_ (j) Location and description of disposal, transfer and processing facilities to be phased out along with _ rawer of closing. (17176d). .. _ _ .. _ 41-4 to 10-9 f - '-VIII=7.1,14; XIIz31 '") - 00303 _ a s (h) :oca o- eac =='s=- ie- -=osa: sit=s :a:e been clesed. t _;6c)_ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ... _ _ _ _ 1 (1) Latter control pro_zay. (17176e and F;2). _ _ VII-7;• V111-12; XII-5 (a) Pragzaa fur disp.:sal of special and hazardous wastes. VII-5 to 8; 117176e and r6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . VIII-12 - 13) Plan Administration � (a) O_cazizational structure to a&rinister the plan. (17177a). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VIII-3 . . (b) Pssignment of functions including: policyraking, public information, budgeting, planing, adoption and enforce-_ vent of ordinances and standards, and rianagement and operation of the system. (17177b). . - . . . . . - . VI11-4•to. 15 (c) Relationship of local jurisdictions (cities, districts) ■ _ and private industry to county plan; identify roles and responsibilities of each. (17177b) .. . . . . . _ . VIII-4 to 15 14) Economic Feasibility of Plan Elements: Cha ter.IX-_XII-2 (a) Economic feasibility, short-term- (17178b) _ .... .. .. P +. 1) Identification of capital and operating costs. (17178b). . _ _ . . _ . . . . . . .... ..2X-2. to 4. 2) Funding plan_ (17178b) _ . .. . . . . . . _IX-1,4 ■ (b) Economic feasibility. medium-term: (17178c). -Chapter:IX . (c) Economic feasibility. long-terms. (17178c). . ..Chapter.IX. _ I (d) Flexibility of funding plan. (17178d)_ .. _ _ . _..:IX 3.4 n R 15) Implementation of the Plan (a) Implementation schedule. (17179asb and A3).__. -. ...-. _Chapter XII 1) Short-term. (17179asb) . . . _ ... . ._.._ _ _ _ .Chapter XII 2) rsedius-terick. (17179asb). ._ _ .• . _ _ .. .Chapter -XII Long-term. (17179asb). - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ .. _ Chapter XII (b) General description of resolutions and ordinances needed VIII-10,11; for Plan inplementation. (17279b). -. _ _ XII-2,3 - 00304 �. .,,e.� ,�y ,i iEiz, pp4oPN�;rwff(t 6a ¢+ T, ,k T.5 n..,,5ar«tN.i$s �i*3i iron �i• .°,1�q� q6 ffi8+...,�Yss+Cr I.gi� � �I'33i I ' III f h ifa"§ FAY F :; x, F#� .w, �.r.6 Tf '�,+a';W ' � i+r < s liji, {� ar...,: "Sz sgt ,.:a�,,h � u r 6` `<s `wa+ '-t 'r•4 q'YJ a �%r.. ' ', . >«ia� I rav ti 4 ac, r x r a x sir k� n i a d 444 I iX14 �,t I f I lid I'i,pi R II -$€.�. "`Y+`,i"# u"` ,++f..1.S p�i`x•�';�&��t1 pi� I I �Ii;�i " 1:L3 '3'.3RC , T'XSl$ $�2.Cx $�tSSCZ�,�'J.tchrey • C t�li{�I iII 3 z. :��i'.rs'e•`k3an�-.2T1g and .Da ,�YJsr3 G�'--,.,� t 3}?����„ ,,.-, ��� ���=' '-+� ���i'i �I II 'h�°t ` -.t ni rk � �r`.^-� r-.: -��t.,,...��r��'�, �i�'� r re&,��.r��"a''h4S s..�'�s.�x�w^".1. ...ti�"!•�`d������"�, � VES ���L= 'IR it+ e�A71t= teACryj►�13nZp&"°�E7lCt�E'AG 1 453.tuatt:0Him 5 U CS a!II §q �fi`'S��'•"^�.xr.��1 may,„+.fix >w"i�? cwt s�,�"' ',...T cr�" �� .III '��'�=r-z�.����``" •�.2Dt*2S,],OSSS HOZ„�25104�1C� CV1£Mn.aTll�allQad�2A��0��`�SP�S'��2l1 �.,�� � � �"� -_ 1 •"" ku 5��i r=�� ��'�Cbe p��`4h�"� �,,�.�' '�"+ "���' ir� 'sem. ���"'"+t.� ,1e1€iia s�-4 re E '". � s 4 a a -- yr4ta; 'P*„'+ a`A ;,�"�'�',� t 5 �'�':e. MON gq 1r 'lll v nN sa. ,. +'i 10+ , f,�sc'.z, � ,�„ �,'��, ��.� „^-rs� �r n '4 Vit"'�a �r ^Y t�i`�` �"'.'t,���3„�,�•,,'�a�-mss����'- .,�. dm3riin °vim rF re aww �t,9'c W"�`� ��2� rr s �'�efa``�k. 'w' i� K e � s��` � � }�; &�'"+N��r'�^•«•+:tG" t�" - - k ,.y'.*'� r,�" db�".�,`�, Y�, ,+<' 7 r „.y, �y k*a',u y a '' C' '„a."''rF"F`" s^s�X •``kx �i` .. es— rwu S z g" C a x�� s�..'1r x '$ ,' r W k yi a.'.,�` l; ;�. � h` s s + µ' k'cx` t -s" `Y Sr'S '�4 # Y t-ks`'..�`to f`s� C � `'�' .r �����'ar»�'ws� � ,fit Q:: •� �w������`' v "�t �'����Y 3va�,�� .�cz,�s�„� •*h"+an� � � � .nom. ��,�?�,"F`„,y- _- NOvs WQ— mow .,, F«°c � � v �"'�u^ *Nt '�.'���1C.�"`� n z: � �4.�"�"s".s`- x-�."a.3y,, r•9.,xv was r�',�` 't - ��,,,k',^ - ,0"f s QUIu COPIES OF DOC[A1Eh'TS Indicating City Approval of the Plan and their Comments i i 7 1 O0306 O► i ilIf L i+icy, RIvD PO 369 AGENDA RIM (date) November 24, 1976 R�T- {~° V±_ E James P. Kenny, Chairman ov 2 9 1970 Board of Supervisors a, Contra Costa County CaueO"i:0. U�1SO2 P. 0. Box 911 ' ' aim Martinez CA 94553 / The Antioch City Council has approved the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan submitted by your Board for consideration. There were no comments or amendments included as conditions of approval. i &7-4 ) THOMAS W. 0GLESBY i City Manager f TWO:mv cc: Jack Port, Asst. Public Works Director Environmental Control f i C 0030'7 f aa� atr a LJ q f 3.0.Bos_90.CLAYTON.CALUORKIA 94V7 aryC". t TELEPHO\E 699•:6.2 Cx,.wA Lncae ns+�.+ „ G..otrx F.Bovwz T�! i• tcoverber 1B, 1;75 cru.uan.EVAM _ Ao)E.T W.H07i1 Gto.0 L Pnrrw f� Mr. Steve Uright }• L.C.C. Public Works Dept. 65i Pine Street, 6n- floor Parti nez, Calif- 94553 Re: L.C.C. Solid 'fasts Management Revised Plan i Dear M'r. Mrioht: At the City Council meating of November 17, 1976, a motion was made to adopt the Contra Costa County Solid !L'aste Management Revised Plan as approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 9, 1976. It passed unani— mDusly by those Councilmembers present. Mayor Levine i was absent. As soon as the minutes of that meeting are approved ' by the Council at the meeting of December 1, 1976, I t Lill send you a certified copy of the minutes with the above motion for your records.. Yours truly,, Ruth A. Scott Deputy Clerk rs 00308 } i CITY OF HERCULES P. O.HOo 236 HERCUTES. CALIF'ORYU 9454 PHONE (413) 735-4850 ri i NOV I , �371G ink �'�T�ui; November 17, 1976 Jack Port, Assistant Public Works Dir_ Environmental Control Sixth Floor Administration Building Martinez, California, 94553 Dear fir. Port_ The city council of the city of Hercules, at its adjourned regular meeting held Tuesday, November 16, 1976 approved revisions to ,the draft Solid Waste Management Plan as revised by the Interim Policy Body for Solid haste Management on Nov- f; e.nber 4, 1976 by unanimous vote. Sincerely yours, RE I� D c L Maryelle, c Corm ck �W 3 1976 City Clerk j-X-bLSSONSWUM= C( CO Bv..._...-._LCL-..�.i"1!'..�r. ._D_ 00309 ..0 rd: : a'oz, vexY K.V.esv�n.!•.�r> Raben a .Roche Nio.:.aa7L=je U PUBLIC !!'L;:S DZPART!,-ENT November.23, 1976 i� Jack Pert Public Works Department County Administration Building Martinez, Ca. 94553 !1t Dear Jack: - I' i; In reply to your letters of November l and November 9, our City w , I Council at its adjourned regular meeting on November 22, 1976 adopted ji the County's Solid Waste ranagement.Plan dated November, 1976, with � I' the revisions proposed on November 4 by the Interim Policy Body and approved by the Board of-Supervisors.on November 9_ If you meed any further evidence of this City Council action, please let me know what is required and I will try to provide it. i t The Council's approval was by motion (rather than by the adoption (1 of a formal resolution), and the Council adopted precisely the :same ! Plan as was adopted on November 9 by the Board of Supervisors. Tours very truly, I! . I _ !1 E. C. MARRINER !I City.Hanger ! i 00310 _975 OAHI_wti'D ST. LAPAYETIF CA 94549 (415)294-195 1 DocumEmT Is ILLECtieLa AT TIME OF Micao - FILmopici, ,g ..,..- � - Cu��L lra�.� r�r�i7• - - - - - i ad^��''a•��-•a�.-."�. jr- -Cost-z��'7+�'"'ST�L` -' L700-lf:-s_Xenl,rJ 4,�,.� ,� "ra : •-* i a+ s,.e � 7C` �' is�+fi'''�.,s`:. � ..� 7 ..3L1:7''.r,_'•r_+-...TS_S}cv*.d'2",.>L3_G1^>S s .r„s-irt;4�a 't .,.-+•#"',c �i�•f 's S n�;, �s-`l"`'� TSL y ^-ry.�.. ' ,r..---^,� --•- �.sa- �'* ... ..,r "a^-.<Cie!..,„..r^Ka�..�-'rs.t"�c�xr'3`.,.T'2`t” r-C...}-.>:.,.,Y 2�3��0 �"��.„{�'_. -•� L f".iT"! ""+' R yi +? "C"' ...+•� M..l +ti'r3 ti.1,n�-•.yi.��jTt £� 4" � '`i 4 A 2'S art' �. Z +sem a.2� t� 4 i,y Yr T S..!`��1'"Y^S�A7 �;£K�� ..•�-J?:-� �O} •�- :.: �....c.. ?.ri-- '7Gv.a. -�Sr. ..a•-: t t �"�s{,<. 'i-•- s-%'z �`'a .i;�,r��-T."`ice Y'K 4�,r �rc +w•�"" � '~�_� �-3.,`rs'._.:''�-ti�+�,�`'�st t.£_`a"r,. z.,� `F-„`��.:�'� .�«�c.�£„'s`�.�`��'� `t men 1""2'� r..� Q '3t "'?. ,s. `*-^ -.G -"n, •� -. r �>- "-?i7 0 7� '7 �>'�'� 4.� '��^ �`-�' �S 5�.�.5�.��'+D -� ,_S +OZ _TiQ_l' -' SII_3T�.3.0T7 ZQ�.�•-�i y ._>v1r`+ ,,s=:».: sa-.may, -$ `tai'"'" -�.=r�- +....�y".t2,..'�+c� +r «_'-..xr=`.^r, �>,�Z.. =s .ib-9>fwt i + C_• �t-aIIG'��n•'�^Si-.1ti Ta..�.?Er_�i 4�4;a:..ai12..i2.s�I?'�^£S+�L �.a:,�-�$'Ji1{I,I�E���,s >.;�y ' ^••%tib=z. a -. _ ,y f c r 'yyr-C+�w�'-M.•cam "r 7 iv.+. •a'- l'�"`"'++"':F yr'a�� "E��C��'x'����� r.-`? rSsLC£.s^1._.Zl'�-'ts''1c�2-�5 Z '� II"':�tAT VO' �2t''E2.^"II�''."?��L2.a�J'L..''`+'�.a�•"'J��i yT� sa.,, ".. '`- -� .•...'i a�.-•:-�'r.�.c. +^"'��..�s.. -��"F !',yi"°cr.�+Y',,� ,C-��.y„'1S, a�"� .�-erf!' i���'" ,t'�;�� ^%g- � �F,� � �-�x. ,,;R�`��-''�'�s.�'.+r-�%.:�y:����'�a[�'r' .�+,s�,y�•tj-4`��s��„�`.�� ;� �- �, r � <... y y i c.. •aL� •+_.sLil"�tD1:=Sy- '�, "t"' _ ? �" :,7�+,._.�_"` .�- �.- yam+. � c _.�t aSw ;s..r '`'�c-e- �.. ti- •,;,t.....��'}w ����.. - �` :. °`-"'y,ac �.,,, w e1 c j ..ct ,�-^ �i.•�;-. r} C~' EZ s}.Sd4 =tet.�' �" r•'"437. � �'t,'.-"" s i.4� �-aL♦C�"'. > 2._. -` '+"� .L-�^' 1' .y Ty"i C�� a�.s3.�7L+:��.+°' �'Sy �,�y y.y 'ht',µ„"'"ar^.�.7uy�� . > ie = -,+. • fie} ct-i L-y.•s yy �- .i3 3- "'��.r j'` �.:e. k�'2�ti`i i � -:,«.3''� .a.�'Swf raM''���. ''�'v FL'a?+'�'�I++���� - .z` •`t�""V.`` 't...,.`'r``• "��"�-...y���:`7'�'�t,<"'��1'....��;yd,�ti+ «4'�.'.-,r'rswT•.y�.;►•'�•MSs` ,.�.r' ..,sem Aga, Via. -�a�.��'�-'*.. +�"+s �."`-.;•-Lic. „>-^..,'T�`s.-.�-'.s. -•� „k Safi r:r .;.z` •.;,1rtg13 Z'Y:��i� 'A.�.Yit i��y��fs� .i�..Cy- �M � _. � 3,5`• '� a-'��s.,*i'>'",X:.�.."�'�,i_� tsj,,i '!���j•4'" ;�.t"lb�;'C "'.s v�^jam _ ,,:I - - � r '...T`3.3•;K.'45�.'K`fl�:'ZF�"`hisXi�'Y��S..i'�.... �.. *)t1T'�+- ♦. -. r _ a �y - �-�Q y.'�s�-� � :ate • .. _ `� ��:.�r�� ..- - ;_ r4� ,.,,�.. � ?r AS►... -:+� �.<7�"s'6Y y 'fD.1�•1.1TLSrri. K�tYS . aer l jIFdK, _ ,� __ he of ....fie } Solid W_s_e) 1 RESOLUTION NO. 1272 � } ri=. .5, =he City o- =i_-r_+le rec__•e3 a_-r rev__.:=d a draft of the Contra Costa CoLity Salid Waste "a.:a=e at ?3_n dated Novae- 6, 1976, nre..ared y Metcai: s Bey a.-2d the C:ntsa Costa Co--, P Public i:arks ?ieS artae;,t; and W=.nr3S, -he City of ?£_-sole received a_zd review—ed t'je revisions to said d=aft entad I;ove:aer 9, 1976. i NOW, BE 17 by the City Council of the City of Pinole .j that said plan in-=lluding the ::ove-.3zr 9, 1976, revisions is hereby a-aproved. t =;Ssm ;ao 15th day of 2:0:ewer, 1976, by he following vote, F S r_'r:S: COLNCII`"—EN: Chaked£S, Gould, Goszano, Torrr_y j !.'JES: com4cm MN: s=-,'th - 7 JV-MS F. CFAKE ISj MAYM of the City of ?izole t P.T3'ST: i Xlc rasOS, =qty Cit' Clic - C 00312 J s r+ Regular meeting o= the Ric -•Ticnd ._- Council was called to order at 8:0F p.m. by Mayor Nathaniel Bates_ ROLL C4LL Present: Councilmen Allen, Silva, Nelson, ernan�ez, Vagerman, Corcoran, Campbell and 'Bates. Absent: Councilman Grvdyk. 1 1�:3 MINUTES u ,Iinutes of meeting of November 8, 1976 0 approved_ K071-.7AFRANTS AND REQUISITIONS O En- on Non motion of Councilman Corcoran, seconded ria J f by Councilman ttiaoerman, claims =87880 through =88074 in the amount o: $293,872.67 and reaui- sitiors approved by the Finance Committee were •` - 10 approved by the unanimous vote of the Council. S-+ CONSENT CALENDAR " A motion by Councilman t+agerman, seconded by Councilman ?nelson, for the adoption or ap- proval of those items marked by an asterisk (*) t was passed by the unanimous vote of the Council. PRESENTATIONS Mavor Bates, assisted by Councilmen Presentations Fernandez and Campbell, presented co-nmenda- TbEFt -, ez tions to Esteban Ramirez, Feliciano Salcido, FSalcido, _ j Magdalena and Peter Cantu for their out- Maadale:.a& j standing contribution in community services. PeterCantu 1 AGR.:DEMENTS *-Authorized an agreement with "TJKM," _ AgrVw,TJKM- a California corporation, for consultant ser- Consultant vices. (The contract provides for engineering Services services to identify traffic safety deficiencies at high-accident locations throughout the City, to recommend a priority of actions to be taken r to correct the deficiencies, and to establish an on-going program to identify and correct 1 oroblem locations_ Contract not to exceed 526,500. Project has been accepted as a Cali- fornia traffic safety, project and is 100$ reim- bursable from State Grant Funds): A proposed agreement with Duncan and Jones, Agr%IiAmcan6 Urban and Environmental Planning Consultants, to Jones prepare an Environmental Impact .Report for a'pro- ToPreFare posed sub3ivision in Richmond was presented." EIFF= i (Proposed subdivision to be located between SubdvsnIctd Santa Rita Road and Bruno Road in El Sobrante. Btwn.SantaFd_taFd ' Cost of the EIR is the applicant's responsibility). &Bn_•*nF3IP Councilman Fernanddz, Chairman of the Programs In *a-ante and Planning Committee, reported that his com- mittee reviewed the utter and explained that this matter was on a prior agenda and was held over to explore some of the proble=s -surrounding the permit securing procedure. Te said that a meeting was held and staff informed that there was no alternative once the Environmental Impact Panel has made a decision that there could be a significant environmental impact, other than to go ahead with conducting an EIR study if the _1- 00313 developer would like to proceed_ He also stated that the proposal calls for $6 200 to which to City is to add 25%_ Councifman Fernandez stated that the committee recom- mended approval of the agreement and made a motion, seconded by Councilman Campbell to authorize the agreement. In response to an inquiry by Council..~.,an Silva as to whether the soil studies and testing al- ready completed be included as a part of the EIR, City Manager, Kenneth Smith, stated that no work already completed would be dupli- cated and that all the, completed work would be forwarded to the firm preparing the EIR. In response to another inquiry by Councilman Silva as to whether it was a part of the bid proposal for the firm to complete soil tests and studies, Charles Woodward, Planning Director, explained that the firm is to perform an investi- gation of existing material upon which they based their price. Councilman Wagerman asked if the EIR would cover the total area. Mr. Woodward said that the EIR will cover the entire property between- Bruno Road and Santa Rita Road all the way to the Creek. Councilman Fernandez informed that the Programs and Planning Committee and the Legislative and External Affairs Committee will be considering recommendations to streamline or revamp some of the procedures , for presentation to the Council as a whole. Following discussion the agreement was autho- - rized by the following vote: Ayes: Council- men Allen, Nelson,- Fernandez, Wagerran, Cor coran, Campbell and Bates. Noes: Councilman Silva. AgrWi A proposed agreement with John Kidder to 3cluiKidder assist in highway funding*was presented. (Con- Psstliffilighsy sultant has had extensive experience with the Funding legislative process; agreement is primarily for iioff rran_=Ywy Roffman Freeway authorization. Maximum amount of contract is $27,000) _ Councilman Corcoran, Chairman of the Finance and Economic Develop- ment Committee, reported that his committee re- viewed the matter and recommended approval and on his motion, seconded by Councilman Nelson, the agreement was authorized by the unanimous vote of the Council. RESOLUTIONS Res166-765 *-Adopted Resolutions No. 166-76 and Res167-76 Resolution No_ 167-76 authorizing-demolition AuthDiaroOf of substandard dwellings at 630 Fourth Street, Si standD.lings Riciunond and 26_Seventh Street, Richmond. •630FourthSt& (Structures are vacant and extremely sub- 26SeventhSt standard. They have been extensively damaged by vandalism and fire and create a severe hazard to adjacent property thus constituting a public nuisance. Owners have failed to de- molish and remove these structures as directed or to otherwise comply with written notices to abate the nuisances) . A x168-76 A proposed resolution to retain and re- ToRetzin& habilitate the old library building at Fourth R,e^.abilitate Street and Nevin Avenue for a local museum OldLibrary facility was presented_ Councilman Fernandez, BldgAtFot^-t# Chairman of the Programs and- Planning Committee, St&_evi=Ave reported that t^.e resolution is a formal� state-(�113Z4 Forlocall�*• n ment of Council policy to designate the facilit as a land.-.ark, recistered in the national recis- te_- and made a .notion, seconded by Councilman Position .:as -_a.C_a^ aF _ r e_c_eZ _c cost. Colne•.-man Exp al-e--.. that the cost would be a s_c=rate decision and that this resolution does not near that the facility will be rehabilitated no ;natter what the cost. Follewina dis- cussion, Resolution No. 166-76 wasladooted by theunanimous vote of the Council. Frank Pleich, a menber of the as hoc co,:arittee to save the r;usecm, thanked the Council for its action on this ,:natter. f A proposed resolution concerning the Pes169-76 position classification Plan for the City C nce=Tostn of Richmond was presented. Vit its regular C1assPlanRvsd meeting of October 26, 1976, the Personnel CaHbirlding Board reviewed and recorn-Hended establish- InsoectorClass ment of a revised combination Building TbFeplacea=xent Inspector classification to replace the BldgInspctr current Building Irsnector, Electrical In- Electricallrspctr spector, and Plumbing Inspector classes. RndPluribinglrspc'_r Will permit one Inspector to make all of Classes the inspections on the less complex q;�structcr. being remodeled or under construction. Ordinance in connection therewith) . Councilman Fernandez, Chairman of the Programs and Planning Cornr-ittee, expressed appreciation for the explanation of the item on the acenda. He also informed that the Union representing the individuals in- volved approved the proposed classification and on his motion, seconded by Councilman Corcoran, Resolution No. 169-76 was adopted by the unanimous vote of the Council. On motion of Councilmian Fernandez, Crdkim&*ng seconded by Councilman Corcoran, an ordi- Crd26-76NIS nance amendina Ordinance No. .26-76 N.S. Establishing establishing waaes, salaries, and compen- Waaes,Sal& sation for City employment classes and CcnpFarCty certain exempt positions, (revised com- DrolymztClasses bination Building Inspector classification ProvidirgFor to replace the current Building Inspector, OmbntnBldg Electrical Inspector, and Poc lumbing Inspec- Irsticlass for classes) , was given its first reading lstrdg and laid over one week for second reading by the unanimous vote of the Council. Wlw7t2na�g A proposed resolution concerning the Res170-76 position classification Plan for the City Concerning of Richmond was presented. (At its regular PstnClassPlan meeting of October 26, 1976, the Personnel . di Provingr^or Board recommended adoption of a new classi- IX-4l.a-sof fication of jailer and to allocate four Jailer positions to -the class. Will release four sworn officers for street duty. Ordinance in connection therewith)_ On motion of j Council.:,an Fernandez, seconded by Councilman + Corcoran, Resolution- No. 170-76 was adopted by the unanimous vote-or the Council- Councilman Silva requested that the subject { concerning a hest County Jail Facility be placed on the agenda of the Public safety and Public Services Committee and that a meeting be held with the Sheriff s Department 4 sometime in December_ So ordered- -3- 00315 �_ I es ablis _^.0 -,,;aces, Ss'_=_=res, and ccr..o_.sa- _ _ tion --for City e-a1c;--e nt classes and errs:.= exempt positions to provide for the new classi- ficat ion of Jailer, was given its first reading and laid over one seek for second reading by the unanimous vote of the Council_ MISIDET�NTIION OF Orc37-7615 *-Adopted Ordinance No. 37-76 N_S_ - :s:.�ib-eriod establishing period for filing petitions FarFiLnCFetitrs for the nomination of City Councilmen j Cca:�xi1.,kan during the period January 12 to February 1/12-2/9/77 9, 1977. 0,d33-7&%IS *-Adopted Ordinance No_ 38-76 N.S_ :-,r F-0 t n g C-.r,Irr c1 prohibiting commercial vehicles over 10 � %Iicls0vI0Tb s tons on Kelsev Street between Willard [ cr,ilber st Avenue and Chesley Avenue. C.rd39-76I5 *-Adooted Ordinance No_ 39-76 N.S. Pr*:btngemrcl prohibiting commercial vehicles over 10 VIncisovI0Tons tons on Kelsey Street between Willard O^-Kelse"'St Avenue and Chesley Avenue_ COUNCIL AS WiOL£ *-Referred proposed South Richmond ScRichShoreline/ Shoreline Special Area Plan, the Shoreline SpAreaPlanTo Tideland Physical Constraint Area Regula- Plar+rsr_g(o, tions of the Hazard-Resource Additive Dis- trict, and other implementation measures, to the City Planning Commission. (Required step preceding construction of Marina) _ REPORTS OF OFFICERS ' t '�.amks giving City Clerk announced that there would Feast_=orShirada be a Thanksgiving Feast for Shimada Visitors VisitorsNov23 on Tuesday, November 23, 1977, at 6:30 p.m. at St_ Luke's Methodist Church. CouncCampbell Councilsan Campbell stated that a meeting R,_P1arsLinoDept held earlier this evening was an attempt to &E,�lovee.ttitudes improve the image of City Hall with respect y�eting to the Planning Department and employee' . attitudes_ He said that the meeting was a constructive one and felt that a lot will develop from it. He said that one of the priorities of the Council is to improve working relationships between the City and Contractors. He also thanked all persons who attended_ CLI.ncFe_-:"cez Councilman Fernandez stated that he Rte•a�}?ca-�.nt had occasion to talk with former Undersecretary F.aditOfGovt Floyd Hyde, who is now with a firm specializing Cberationsln in help to Municipalities, and requested that Richpro?osal Fr. Hyde put into writing a proposed manage- rdib?zZGra7:sfi ment audit of government operations in Richmond. PlanningCorm He said that he was now in receipt of a proposal from Mr_ Hyde and submitted the proposal to the Favor for referral to the proper committee_ Mayor Bates referred the matter to the Programs ana Planning Committee for report back to the Council_ -Y- 00316 ;,W; 1 r-; _._ i L i- T.e :et-��'r.•?: �^� �^.COI'.'.•_1S7- ?�11'.F.1Tl."::S m ent5 of he Council d;:ri_-c the se:'en. years Heih'iilT3bt he has Serve, on the Council 5!.;Ch as: the SeekReeleLtion hilltop Shopping Center; the chana_na of the At7heErAOf D..w=LOW.n a. cc Tor ,the better; t.se i'JCel Cities H1S1Zr7LTE S1 ; Procrair, which :.as noted as one of the best 1977 an the nation; the progress o: the Port 1n view of the recent contract with Matson Cortalner Terminals; the ad-ltion of 1400 acres Or Open s:ace; three new COTrAt1unity Centers; growing assessed value; a stable r tax rate and said that he was proud of the part he played in these accomplishments- Councilman Fernandez expressed his gratitude to the Councilmembers for their concern and advice, to his family and -friends tho worked so hard to secure his election and to the citizens who gave him the opportunity to vote his own convictions on many issues affecting the City_ riavor Bates expressed his regrets and suagested that the decision be held* open until the sinal date. He said that he has enjoyed working with Councilr„ar. Fernandez and felt he was a very valuable member of the team and expressed hope that his decision was not non-negotiable. Councilman Silva concurred in the remarks of Mayor Bates_ Coun=t_mann. Silva rq•.:_red as to wale trier Ca.2ncilnanSilva an Appraisal Plan for Department Beads, which RecruPs-sThat was developed by a Task Force of Businessmen, FutureSalary a Union rearesentatives and staff during the IncreasesFar time he served as D.ayor, was still in effect. DedtHeadsBe City P7anaaer, Kenneth Snaith, stated that the BasedCri-ppraisal proposal was never funded and was not prepared ReferredTo to report on it- Councilman Silva stated that Finance&Ecomiuc he has been disappointed with the performance DevelcpTentCaam of some of the department heads recently and requested that all future salary increases.for department heads be based on appraisal and that those appraisals be reviewed by the Finance Commaittee and their recommendation be made to the Tull Council_ He requested that the matter be referred to the Finance Committee nor adoption and a revision of the Salary Ordinance_ So ordered- Mayor � Bates requested that the City Manager supply each Councilmember with a copy of 1� the Appraisal Plan -for Department Heads- Councilman Pslen expressed his opinions CaawilranMen t};at the Councilmembers and Com•nissioners ReStudySession were not going all that should be done in (k Re ieveloment governing the Redevelopment Agency and said Agcy that there were many things happening at the Redevelopment Agency that the Council-members and Coraissioners were totally unaware and requested that a Study Session be held con- cerning the role or the Commissioners, the ;. plams that are being made, and a better perspective of the direction in which the '. new Economic Development and Renewal Adminis- trator efforts will be in following through on Redevelopment projects. Councilman Cor- coran stated that he was aware of every hin-9 that was happening in -the Redevelopment . Agency and did not share the view of Council- : man Allen regarding the Redevelopment Agency- 00317 -5- !. r - �ti 4E A Mayor Eaters state-' t.at -:5 a -has a rca:em or is ce_st=_-=-- - ..= s o co to the Recevelcn-ment Ac ,a.: fi=st -s ==rect rheJ problem and if he is unsuccess-ful there, he should bring it to a con«ittee mor review. He also advised that all Councilmen have the prerogative to review any matter related to money. tiavor Bates said that a Study Session on the matter could be held if the full Council :eels it is necessary, but if it is the concern of only one or two Councilmen, the matter should be taken care of on a com- nittee basis. =�sncil-'az Councilman, Campbell stated that it would Fe<T=*dezDecsn be a loss to the City of Richmond if Councilman !btTr,Sc_kF.eelectn Fernandez does not seek reelection to the Council and concurred in the remarks of Mayor Bates in urging that the decision be recon- sidered. Vice Mayor : agerman also expressed his regrets and urged that Councilman Fernandez reconsider his decision. RavviekFireSt n Mavor Bates announced an open house =-LLibr Open and ribbon cutting for the new Bayview Fire Houtell/19/76 Station and Library on Friday, November 19, 1:OOP.M. 1976 at 1:00 p.m. REPORTS OF COYNITTEES -�=-^edCon rct *-Awarded contract to low bidder, Western W-es;.e_'neate_rprfng Waterproofing Company, Inc_, in the amount of CoLnr--orC-,tz_ng $66,400, for the cutting back and repointing 9ack&Ranntng the mortar joints of the brick walls on the %br'arj s - south side of the auditorium. Engineer's S,;.S .aditoritm estimate - $80,000. re7te=�+ork *-Accepted work of Grand Prix Building C_ra_*c�ri-5ldgSys:m Svstem for completion of the installation of ?^stal1CfSnc3a<-rier the Sound Barrier Valls on Hilltop Drive on WallsHilltobDr November 9, 1976, for a total cost of $65,865.20. AD?rover.:brt In the matter of report regarding County F; �olic'1.'aste Solid waste Management Plan, Councilman Silva, ?-hc=zzrPlanPs Chairman of the Public Safetv and Public Services Aaprrzz_�d Committee, reported that his committee reviewed OfSua«sOn the matter and recommended approval. (50% of 11-9-76 cities representing 50€ of County Population must ratifv. County Mayor's Conference has recommended and Countv Board of Supervisors has adopted. Due date is December 1, 1976. 1 i Plan contains interim and long range solutions to solid waste disposal) _ on motion of Councilman Silva, seconded by Councilman Corcoran, the Novermer 1976 Contra Costa County Solid Waste *?aragement Plan, as approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on November 9, 1976, was approved by the unanimous vote of the Council. =-ppro'ed In the matter regarding minimum $300 per F_ :v_—. a:ion month pension for general pension fund retirees F.aVdnL-a*-iaersion 65 years and older who have retired with less For-Ge-neralPersion than full service, (If approved, City Attorney FL-n:Re=�Tees will prepare appropriate charter amendment for submission to voters at Mav 10, 1977 General Election.) Councilman Corcoran, Chairman of the Finance Committee, reported that his committee reviewed the matter and recommended approval. He explained that eleven individuals were involved with service ranging from 20 - 26 years now re- ceiving from. $190 - $270 per month. He advisees 00318 trhat it would cost $9,136 for the year. Mayor Sates reaUested clarification as to the COunciv s i as it rel..-_5 to e.^.aors_lnc _ :.E nea store om the bcl?of. City Clerk. ad e 2 se that the matter would be brought to the Council again for a formal resolution to consolidate this ratter with the General Election and the Council would have an op- portunity to file an argument in favor or against the measure. On motion of Councilman Corcoran, seconded by Councilman Nelson, the recommendation of the committee was approved by the unanirsous vote of the Council. Mayor Bates inquired as to whether ReDeseret.-. there was a report regarding the Deseret Path Path problem, to which Robert Latchaw, Problem Director of Public works, advised that a study was. being made to ascertain whether a recommendation to abandon the path could be made. Be also estimated that the matter I would be on the agenda of December 6, 1976 ` following consideration by the Planning i Commission. 14ayor Bates requested that Mr. Curtis Barre be kept informed as to the meetings. Mr. Barre stated that he would appreciate being kept informed as he took time off from work to be here to- night. COMwMNICATION I *-Set date of December 13; 1976 as SetDec13• time for public hearing of appeal by PubHrg Gerald Breuner from a decision of the AppealBy Planning Commission which denied a conditional . GBreuner use permit to operate an airport on property SPC located west of Parchester Village and the l Use Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, PexmitMog3erate southerly of Banks Drive projected westerly.. AirportWestQf X-3 -District. 'ParchesterVilldOe The meeting was adjourned at 8:49 p.m. to meet again in one week, November 22, 1976 at 8:00 p.m. Clerk of the City of Richmond •f (SEAL Anaroved: • Mayor a a -7- 008110 - F�E' V—;:. -=- 12, w -Fez-d or $=Jer11 sc--z •f YW. "° tui=�R/ _ Marzinez, CA Dear S="s: =t i.lS2 hA1e»::?r '=, 1c73 Ci'..} 1.01:.^.^ s De@t`.ing,'.tIIE','.$an =ab- City Council re-=e=d and.approved the Contra Costa Co nay 5o3id -as:e ?;:P-ra_remenz alar.. s ,:C_ =:rkh2u ^ -t ^=setts zl Ceri� � ro, 'erc =ino- y^=_!=nond, and San ?ablo on the = .ter=3 Yo'•_c_ Body. -t '_::ere st'111 remminseveral '_.cy.po f-zs';es t-:C4 are in d1sc ssion, i-he Cizy Council agreed :ae l_::,trL :ciicy Bc-y for adaption at this time �^ Girder c mee st F-te =Gad-ate. . .. - Sincerely, Michael 'Warren pct . r,... A:Lainist _5..�:.r. . to the .Cit; ..e cZ3ger cc: jack ,Tort,. Asst. ?:�Jiic 'corks .,'3i�actor _..cira:�:.enta? Co:zt-o3 - Public a.orks DiEz)-a—tment ' _.�:.'�ice'., e•', x .. 00320 !. Tai-..= irc=r, �=` i�crria MINUTE ORDER OFF ICE OF 711E CITY CLERK Bate ►Sr,.. n 1 S7r _ien:ion: Contra £csta County Public ;;arks Dept. ata :look, Administration Building na.-t i nes, Ca_ 04553 i Att: Steve Wright In the Latter of: Solid Waste ua.-.ac_ment Plan ± At a meeting of the City Council of the CITY OF-WALNUT CREEK on _ o ,5i7L at which were present Councilmen on motion of Councilman ;�r� seconded by Councilman duly carried and entered in the minutes, it was ordered: Council Co---sinications "rovar: Referred to the verx)randun: and copy of the revised Solid Waste Vanagement Plan fori..arded previously to the Council by the Manager. The same has been reviewed by the !1--yors' Conference. Pravisioas of the plan in some cases are hazy but are still general -enoueh they could be controlled by the Interim 'Policy Body. It is necessary that cities tole action on this plan for the Srard of Supervisors' consideration by the-Dec.-I State daadiine_ Approval is reccr-n_nded.. Notion by Kovar, second by Hazard and unanimously carried to approve the Pian." - _ l hereby certify ttat the foregoing is a tree and correct cnoy of 2 portion of the minutes of t}ic City Council meeting for Adele C_ Laine.-,CITY CLERK z - -- _ -- -- _0032T ---- - -- � COPIES OF DOCLOMNITS Indicating City Disapproval of the Plan and their Comments s i 00322 P03LIC COUNCIL �s ili itS t1 rt _ i;t' tl y'n, Nove.mber 16 1 C E�,;S'ZE,E:u Jvc �� ' i t L \.i 1J i V• �J ►ca\G—. j ArC.-S:.nw rd SARI<KE U4NG;;;A=-E+a.oE he Honorable fames P. Kenny, Chairman and jQ76 Mer-hers of the Board of Supervisors c1.;v E.us:.:J.tiw Contra Costa County Rr,^,-ti4A�A 5=i:tuew+:Aaai y i stratlon Building r�A- Ua�;- i J-� 1 , g c Apr. n '• w. v: cm'r,!ANAGER 1.1artinez, CA 94553 /1!Q w�ti.r R`:.•i�:L•.5:'MN RE: Solid Waste management Study Plan Gentlemen: The City Council of El Cerrito, at its meeting on November 15, 1976, voted unanimously to disapprove the Solid taste 2,anage- ment Plan submitted to the City by the County on November 5 for E1 Cerrito's consideration- In reviewing the most I recent plan produced by the Solid Waste Management Study Committee, it has the unanimous feeling of the members of the City Council of El Cerrito that this plan fails to meet the goals established in S3 5- S3 5 was the basic legislation requiring each county in the state to prepare a plan which provided for, among other things, a goal of 25 percent source reduction through resource recovery. In addition, the City Council of E1 Cerrito felt that the questions it had raised in December of 1975 concerning the plan in existence at that time had not been addressed in the new plan_ In fact, the City Council concluded that there had been no change in the Solid Management Plan. - The City Council of El Cerrito, in December of 1975, raised a number of Dolnts which the City Telt should be included In the final plan. These points were: 1_ The plan should recognize the need to improve the West County dump site, based on deficiencies noted in the Contra Costa County Health Department evaluation_ 2_ There is a need for a joint declaration to insure inter- County cooperation-in solid waste disposal and recovery_ 3- That early action be taken on the formation of a management agency to implement the Solid Waste management Plan_ The plan still does not include an agency for implementation and long-range operation_ of the plan in Contra Costa County. 4_ That the plan recognize the need for development of an - - alternative to the prepared plan in the event it is not adopted or otherwise fails to be implemented_ I , 1976 5. That the need be recognized for ':est County Cites to support , the spirit of the law, requiring furthtr of ort in resource recovery from the present 7 percent recovery rate toward H a goal of 25 percent. 6. That the Alan recognize the need for a final plan on the means of source reduction of solid waste. 7. That long-term recovery contracts must follow county-wide efforts for entry into the market, rather than precede such entry. S. That additional study be directed at hazardous waste and the necessity of meeting state requirements pertaining thereto and that such study should be included in the Solid ,Taste Management Plan. In addition to these points which the City of E1 Cerrito raised in December of 1975, the City Council of EI Cerrito would make the following points. The present plan is inadequate in its provision_ for a county coordinating body. The composition of that body is not representative of the broad range of interests within the county,. the charge_ to the corranittee is indefinite and not designed to meet the goals of SB 5, and there is no timetable for implementation of the plan. s For the above reasons, the City Council of E1 Cerrito respectfully disapproves the plan submitted to it by the Solid Waste Management � Committee of Contra Costa County. The present plan is a plan in name only and does not address the needs outlined in SB 5. Therefore, we would suggest that the Solid haste Management Plan be returned to the committee for restudy and major revisions in accordance with suggestions the City of E1 Cerrito has made in this letter. Sincerely yours, Ernest Del Simone Mayor RVB/gm cc Chairman Richard LaPointe, Contra Costa County Mayors' Conf_ Mr. John C. Boulihan, Executive Secretary, Mayors' Conf. 0=4 , r� • r- i y i - CERTIFIED COPY ofCounty Board of Supervisors' Resolution Approving the Plan -ti 4 � 0032 r vi Contra Costa County, 5. oil Calil'ornia November 9 19 76 I In the Power of f Annroval of the Rovayber 197b Di-aft, Contra Costa Counts Solid Waste Management Plan and Revisions Mlereto.- =, Mae November 1976 draft of tae Contra Costa County Solid :•taste Xanagement Plan hazing been presented to the Board for review; and Revisions to the aforesaid draft, as recommended by the Interim Policy Body For Solid Waste Y.anagemsnt, having been received this day; and Mr. Jack Fort, Assistant Public -Works Director, Environmental Control, having advised that the Interim Policy Body recommends that the Plan, together with the revisions, be adopted by the Board; and 2-Iayor George Lowy of Pittsburg, a representative of the Contra Costa County Mayors' Conference on the Interim Policy Body, } having advised that the Conference requests the -Board to act without j dewy so twat the cities may review said Plan -as quickly as possible; (i and Good cause appearing therefor, 1T 'IS BY TICE BOARD ORDITMED that the aforesaid Plan and the revisions thereto are APPROVM), the same to be submitted to the cities for review and approval. PASSBD by the Board on November 9, 1976• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid- - ccs Public Works Director Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of --Environmental Control -Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this Stn day of November , 19 Z6 Interim Policy Body i (Via Public Warks) {i Contra Costa County _ J. R. OLSSOIII, Clerk i 3layorsI Conference By J i Deputy Cleric (Via Public Works) can L. Miller County Bealth Officer Co=n--y Administnator 00326 H-24 3/7613m t SUMARY OF CITY APPROVAL. OF PLAN i (1 CITIES WHICH APPROVED PLM DATE OF APPROVAL POPULATION 1 City of Antioch November 23, 1976 31,900 City of Brentwood November 23, 1976 3,470 City of Clayton November 17, 1976 1,750 E City of Concord November 22, 1976 90,400 City of Hercules November 16, 1976 120 € City of Lafayette November 22, 1976 20,500 City of Martinez November 18, 1976 18,000: , r Town of Moraga November 17, 1976 10,110 1 City of Pittsburg November 15, 1976 24,500 ` City of Pinole November 15, 1976 14,600 City of Pleasant Hill November 22, 1976 27,850 City of Richmond November 15, 1976 74,700 i City of San Pablo November 11, 1976 20,800 City of Walnut Creek November 9, 1976 47,350 +` Subtotal-14 Cities 386,050 CITY WHICH DISAPPROVED THE PLM 2 City of E1 Cerrito November 15, 1976 23,750 Subtotal-1 City 23,750 TOTAL-15 Cities 409,800 0032'7 :1 geoad of Supervisors Contra C�'", P.m""'"" Jams R_Olson ministration Building Costa P.O,Box 911 Ex O'Clark CClar of the Board } Martinez,California 94553 Cou Mhz GChief Clark Rued! s James P.Ke my-Richmond (415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Dias-El Sobrante 2nd District James E.Moriarty-Lafayette 3rd District Warren N.Boagess-Concord 4th District Edmund A.Linscheid-Pittsburg November 30,.. 1976 5th District Our File: RD 18C Dtr. Alfred.M. Dias, Chairman - RECEIVED State Solid Waste Management. Board.. 1416 - 9th Street, Room 1335- DEC 4 1976 Sacramento,. CA 95814 Attention:: Db-_ Albert Marino, Executive Officer cua oFPE"Rvlsoas A CA. Dear-Mr. Dias_ e Enclosed for your review and comments are the following document which constitute submittal of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan: 1. CONTRA-COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN, NOVEMBER 1976, as recommended by the Interim Policy Body for Solid Waste Management on November 4, 1976, and as approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 9, 1976; 2. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REPORT, DECEMBER 1975; 3. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW CHECK- y LIST DATED NOVEMBER 29, 1976; 4. COPIES OF DOCUMENTS INDICATING. CITY APPROVAL of the Plan and their comments; 5. COPIES OF DOCUI•lENTS INDICATING CITY DISAPPROVAL of the Plan and their comments; 6. CERTIFIED COPY OF COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS' RESOLUTION approving the Plan; 7. SUAAIARY of City approval of the Plan. Microfilmed with board order oU`32 i f a Mr_Alfred M. Dias -2 November 30; 1976 3 Please note that a majority of the cities within the County which contain. , , a majority of the population of the incorporated area of the County have �� approved the November 1976 Draft Solid Waste Management Plan as approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 9, 1976. All of the documents indicating city action have not yet been received. When the certified documents indicating city action on the Plan have been received, they will be forwarded to the State Board. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Steve Wright of the County staff at (415) 671-4295- Very truly yours, James P. Kenny, Chairman Board of Supervisors JPK/hl Enclosures— cc.- nclosures .cc. Supervisor James E. Moriarty, Chairman, Interim Policy Body Arthur G. Will, County Administrator Public Works Department i 00329 1 i Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan 11OTWBEP 1976 DR4.zT PPEPAAED d0I11Trry BY Metcalf& Eddy I Engineers Boston Ne%vYork PaloAlto ChCago Contra Costa Public Works Department County L IPOMENTAL CONTROL DIVISION FLCOAffEVL'="D BY THE _OUCo BODY FOP. SOL_TD WASTE 1M14GEMENT ON NO'JEEZ-7. 4, 1976 A_�PPOVED BY TE' BOARD 0_ SJ_=I-SOPS ON .70r-EzO. 9, 1976 00330 r i The SoZid Waste Management Plan Man) for Contra Costa County dated Rovmber Z898 is presented in this document. DetaiZs of the anaZysis that Zed to the recarmended plan are presented in a sena to voZ:ate ertitZed "Contra Costa Count=y SoZid Waste :Anacment Pe,ort, Dece^Wer Z975," prepared by ?'etcak-. & rdy, Inc. A.ppendi.-. C of this ?Zan is an a-rerrrent to the above ?ievort. t,. ,.._ 00331 ACIMOWLEDGEMENT The members of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee are hereby acknowledged for their time, effort, and cooperation in the development of the November 1975 Draft of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan and the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Report, December 1975 (Report) . Acknowledgement is also given to the members of the Contra Costa County Interim Policy Body for Solid Waste Management for their guidance in the preparation of the November 1976 Plan, in particular for their valuable assistance in rewriting the MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM (Chapter VIII) . Finally, acknowledgement is extended to the staffs of the various county offices, the County Administrator's Office, County Counsel's Office, Planning Department, Health Department, Sheriff's Department, and the Public Works Department; the several private consulting firms; and all who participated and assisted in the development of the Plan and the Report. i : :f O0332 �3 '...NIA. „t• :..... .... .•r. at. CONTRA COSTA COLnM INTERIM POLICY BODY FOR SOLID WASTE :8_r,4AGE1oMT*** MEMBER OFFICIAL CAPACITY REPRESENTING James E. Moriarty* Member Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Margaret W. 8ovar** Councilwomaa Central Cities less Con- City of Walnut Creek cord: Clayton, Lafayette, Martinez, Town of Moraga, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek Laurence B. Azevedo Councilman City of Concord City of Concord Leonard L. Battaglia Director San Pablo Sanitary District San Pablo Sanitary District Willem Berkhout Councilman Western Cities: City of San Pablo El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, and San Pablo John A. Bohn Special Counsel Central Contra Costa Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Sanitary District J. L. (Bea) Director Other Special Districts: Griffanti Mt. View Sanitary District Byron, Crockett-Valona, Mt. View, Oakley, Rodeo, and Stege Sanitary Dis- tricts, and the Valley Community Services District George L. Livingston Consumer Representative Consumers George Lowy Mayor Mayors' Conference City of Pittsburg Boyd M. Olney, Jr. President Private Industry Contra Costa County Disposal (Solid Waste Sector) Association Mel Whatley Councilman Eastern Cities: City of Antioch Antioch, Brentwood, and Pittsburg *Chairperson "Vice Chairperson ***Established by the Board of Supervisors on April 27, 1976, and still active 1i 00333 Y ,a 00333 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY COMMITTEE*** MEMBER OFFICIAL CAPACITY REPRESENTING James P. Kenny* Member Board of Supervisors Board of Supervisors Daniel L. Yee** Director Sanitary District San Pablo Sanitary District President's Council West County Area Laurence B. Azevedo Councilman Mayors' Conference City of Concord Central County Area John A. Bohn Staff Central Contra Costa Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Sanitary District Central County Area Gregory A. Cook Councilman Mayors' Conference E1 Cerrito West County Area Richard M. Granzella President Refuse Collector Richmond Sanitary Service West County Area J. L. (Ben) Griffanti Director Sanitary District Mt. View Sanitary District President's Council Central County Area Lee B. Hertzberg Staff East Bay Municipal East-Bay Municipal Utility Utility District District Louise Gunn Member League of Women Voters League of Women Voters Margaret W. Kovar Mayor Mayors' Conference City of Walnut Creek Central County Area Edmund A. Linscheid Member Board of Supervisors Board of Supervisors George Lowy Councilman- Mayors' Conference City of Pittsburg East County Area Louis Mascheroni President Refuse Collector Pittsburg Disposal Service East County Area Boyd M. Olney, Jr. President Refuse Collector Pleasant Hill-Bayshore Central County Area Disposal Harry G. Reeves Member Sierra Club Sierra Club *Chairperson **Vice Chairperson ***Established by the Board of Supervisors on October 24, 1972, and dissolved on December 2, 1975 00334- . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY COMIITTEE*** (Concluded) MEMBER OFFICIAL CAPACITY REPRESENTING Mel Whatley Councilman Mayors' Conference City of Antioch East County Area Henry W. Simonsen President Industrial Tank, Inc. Industrial Tank. Inc_ Shirley M. Smith Member Comprehensive Health Comprehensive Health Planning Planning Association Association Earl Wetzel Director . Sanitary District Byron Sanitary District President's Council East County Area Don Wagerman Councilman Mayors' Conference City of Richmond West County Area iv • et ? 00M) i PARTICIPATING STAFFS COUNTY OFFICES Administrator's Office - Arthur G. Will, County Administrator County Counsel's Office - Silvan H. Marchesi, Deputy County Counsel Planning Department - Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning James W. Cutler, Planner III Health Department - Ted M. Gerow, Public Health Engineer Roger O. Chin, Senior Sanitarian Sheriff's Department - Patricia Schmidt, Litter Control Officer Public works Department - Vernon L. Cline, Public works Director Environmental Control Division: Jack Port, Assistant Public Works Director, Environmental Control Oliver T. Smith, Environmental Control Engineer Steven J. Wright, Assistant Civil Engineer PRIVATE CONSULTING FIRMS Metcalf 6 Eddy, Inc., Palo Alto, California Franklin L. Burton, Chief Engineer and Vice President W. G. Smith. Project Manager R. Jerome Esmay, Project Engineer Howard L. Selxnick, Staff Engineer Robert M. Finn, Staff Engineer June B. Miller, Technical Editor James Bielke, Graphics Resource Technology Corporation, San Jose, California - Secondary Materials Markets Cooper-Clark i Associates, Palo Alto, California - Geotechnical, John O'Rourke Bartle-Wells Associates, San Francisco, California - Administration and Finance, Raymond K. O'Neil V MUD` ry CONTENTS CHAPTER Page I INTRODUCTION It is Required by State Law.... ............. . I-1 ItAnswers a Need... .......... .. ............... I-1 II PURPOSE OF PLAN It Should Meet the Statewide Objectives....... . II-1 It Should Meet Contra Costa County Goals.. ..... II-1 It Should Assess Local Conditions and Solve Problems.......... ...... ...... ..... ... . II-2 III SOME HISTORY Policy Guidance. . ... ... ... ..... ............. ... III-1 Coordination. ... ...... . .... ..... ....... ..... .. . III-2 IV THE ROLES OF PARTICIPANTS IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT The Homeowners. ..... . .... . ............. IV-1 The Collectors and Disposal Site Operators. ... . IV-1 Local Government.. .. ... ......... .. .. ..... . ..... IV-1 V BASIC PLANNING INFORMATION AND DATA Study Area Characteristics. ..... .. .. ... .. . . . V-1 Management, Collection, Haul, and Land Disposal. . .. .. . . . . . .. ... .. . . . .. .. ...... .. . ... V-1 Quantities, Composition, and Costs of Group 2 Waste Management. ... . . . . .. ....... . .. . .. V-1 Resource Recovery.......... . .. . .. ...... . . . ... .. V-1 Group 1 and Hazardous Wastes... . .. . .. ... ... .... V-4 Special Wastes.. . .. ....... .. ... ...... .. ... ..... V-5 VI RECOMMENDED PHYSICAL FACILITIES PLAN TransferStations.. ..... ..... . .. ... .... .... .... VI-9 Processing Stations... ... .. ... .... .. ..... ... .. . VI-9 Energy Recovery. .. .......... .. .. .. . ...... . .. .. . VI-10 V4 OU33'7 .q CONTENTS (Continued) CHAPTER Page VII OTHER SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS Source Reduction Program.... . . ..... ....... .. .. . VII-1 Source Separation Program. .. ..... ...... .... ... . VII-2 StorageProgram. .. ... .. .. .. . ...... ....... ...... VII-3 Collection Program... ... . ....... ..... .... ...... VII-3 Recycling Center Program....... . .... ........... VII-5 Group 1 and Hazardous Waste Program. .. ..... . .. . VIZ-5 Special Waste Program. ...... ... ............ ... . VII-6 Disposal Site Program. ... ... . .. .. . ............. VII-8 VIII MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM Policy Making. .... . . ... . ... . .. .... .. .. .... . .. .. VIII-4 Public Information.. .. . .. .. .. .. . ......... ... ... VIII-6 Budgeting.. . .. .... . .... .... .. . .... ... ..... .. ... VIII-7 Planning. ... . . .... . . .. . ... ..... . . .. .. .. ... . ... . VIII-8 Adoption and Enforcement of Ordinances and Standards... . . . . .. . ... . . ... ... . ..... . .. . ... VIII-10 Management and Operation of the System.... .. . . . VIII-12 Summary of Management and Administration Program.... ... . .. .. .. . . .... ... . . . . ... . .... . . .. . VIII-14 1X FINANCING PROGRAM Administrative Costs.. ...... .. .... .. .. ... ... .. . IX-1 Capital Costs. ... .. ... . ... .. .... ............ ... IX-4 X CONTINGENCY PROGRA.II. .... .. . . ... .. ... .. ... . . ... . X-1 XI DISASTER PROGRAM. . .. .. ... . . .. . .. ... ... ....•.. . . XI-1 XII IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM.... .... .. .... ... ... ..... XII-1 APPENDIX A--State Policy for Solid Waste Management APPENDIX B-- Background Data and Report Findings APPENDIX C--Forecast of Future Conditions vii 003918 P F= i Ir;. { dap CONTENTS (Concluded) APPENDIX D--ABAG Letter and Contra Costa County Response APPENDIX E--Determination of Compliance of Present Operating Procedures at Existing Dis- posal Sites with the State Minimum Standards (To be performed as part of Task D-1. See p. VIII-8 and VIII-9) by July 1978 APPENDIX F--Determination of Compliance of Present Solid Waste Ordinances with the State Minimum Standards (To be performed as Task E-1. See p. VII-10 and VII-11) by July 4, 1977 APPENDIX G--Errata: Revisions to the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Report of December 1975 viii tt i DUt1Va7 ,i y i LIST OF TABLES Table No. Page V - 1 Summary of Principal Recycling Activities............... ..... ..... ....... V-3 IX - 1 Financing of Solid Waste Management Plan, Annual Administrative Costs.. . .. .... IX-2 IX - 2 Financing Solid Waste Management Plan, Capital Costs. ... .... ...... . ... . .. .. IX-3 XII - 1 Implementation Schedule.. .... .. ........... XII-2 B - 1 Average Homeowner and System Costs.. ...... B-2 B - 2 Composition of Contra Costa County Solid Wastes.. . .. .. ...... .... .. . .... .... .. B-4 G - 2 Current Quantity and Disposal of Septic Tank Pumpings... . . . .. . .. ...... . .... G-2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. VI - 1 The Recommended Plan Physical Facilities. . VI-5 VI - 2 Schematic Solid Waste Flow Diagram Recommended Plan--Short Range. ... . . .. ... .. VI-6 VI - 3 Schematic Solid Waste Flow Diagram Recommended Plan--Medium Range... ..... .. .. VI-7, VI - 4 Schematic Solid Waste Flow Diagram Recommended Plan--Long Range.......... .... VI-8 VIII - 1 Management Agency for the Administration and Implementation of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan.. .. . ... VIII-3 B - 1 Existing Conditions. .. .... .. .... . ..... .... B-3 C - 1 Historical and Projected Populations.. . .. . C-3 C - 2 Solid Waste Volume Projections... . . . ... ... C-3 ix O0qt_ AO i� i - - � ,, .. . .�r.r -...rx,.. , pr.x..-,. .L-+s. ..*. '.'�..•. .k°7 d..,N _ . .... .. ., w/v k'. DEFINITIONS WASTES Group 1 Group 1 wastes consist of or contain toxic substances and substances which could significantly impair the quality of usable waters. Examples are acids, alkalies, pesticides, and chemical toilet wastes. Group 2 Group 2 wastes consist of or contain chemically or biologically. decomposable material, which does not include toric substances nor those capable of significantly impairing the quality of usable waters. Examples are garbage, rubbish, street refuse, dead animals, and agricultural crop residues. Group 3 Group 3 wastes consist entirely of nonwater soluble,, nonde- composable inert solids. Examples are dirt, rock, concrete, and asphalt. DISPOSAL SITES Class I Class I disposal sites are those at which complete protection for the quality of groundwaters, surface waters, public health, and wildlife resources is provided for all time from wastes deposited therein. These sites are designated as capable of accepting for disposal Group 1, 2, and 3 wastes. Class II Class II disposal sites are those at which protection to groundwaters, surface waters; public health, and wildlife resources is provided from Group 2 and 3 wastes. Class III Class III disposal sites are those at which.protection to water quality is provided from Group 3 wastes by locations, construction, and operation which prevent erosion of deposited material. Source: Subchapter 15 of the Administrative Code of the State of California adopted March 2, 1972. 00341 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN I. INTRODUCTION Why have we vrepared a solid waste management plan? It Is Required By State Law The State Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Act of 1972 (Senate Bill Five or SB-5) was passed in August <� 1972. This progressive legislation required, among other things, that every California county prepare a comprehensive solid waste management plan. Before the Plan is adopted as official Contra Costa County policy, it must be endorsed by the County Board of Super- visors and by a minimum of eight cities, which also repre- sent more than 204,900 persons. Next, it must be forwarded, by January 1, 1976, to the State Solid Waste Management Board (SSWMB) . After the SSWMB determines that the Plan meets state guidelines, it becomes the official countywide Plan. The law (administrative Code, Section 17156) also requires that the Plan be reviewed periodically and suggests that it be done at least every 3 years. It Answers a Need SB-5 recognizes that to continue present waste handling practices without planning for the future is potentially unwise. As society becomes more complex, its wastes become more complex. Yesterday's solution--"Haul it to where no one will see it"--is no longer applicable. The recognition that we are burying valuable natural resources (aluminum �OU342 and copper, for example) that could be reused to reduce our energy consumption requires that resource recovery be investigated in-depth and implemented as soon as possible. And since feasible resource recovery schemes presently require large volumes of wastes, it is important to know when these volumes may be large enough to justify the building of necessary facilities and when these facilities can be ready to begin operation. By investigating the entire solid waste system and identifying the interrelation- ships, solutions to these and other significant local problems can be developed and adopted, and the risk of transferring the problems without solving them can be minimized. 1-2 00343 II. PURPOSE OF PL;LN What should the Plan accomplish? It Should Meet the Statewide Objectives A plan should have a set of clearly stated, attainable goals and objectives that give direction to the intermediate steps and guide the participants toward their final achieve- ment. The primary objectives adopted by the SSWMB are to: • Minimize health and safety hazards from solid waste management practices • Protect the environment and preserve natural resources o Encourage source reduction of waste generation • Reduce, by 25 percent, the average municipal waste tonnage disposed to landfills by 1980 • Identify resource recovery potentials and markets for materials A full list of objectives adopted by the SSWMB is included in Appendix A. It Should Meet Contra Costa County Goals In 1975, Contra Costa County supplemented the state goals to guide the preparation of the Plan. In this action, the Solid Waste Management Policy Committee (SWMPC) affirmed that a comprehensive solid waste management plan shall: • Be developed for all types of solid wastes within the county • Consider alternatives for storage, collection, transfer, transport, processing, reclamation, Ii-1 00344 and disposal of wastes from the present time through the year 2020 • Conform to and comply with established and/or proposed policies, standards, and guidelines as promulgated by the SSWMB • Provide the technical and policy background material necessary to enable the county to revise the Preliminary Refuse Disposal Plan which is a portion of the Utility Element of the County General Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 4, 1973 • Promote resource recovery, reduce waste genera- tion, conserve natural resources and energy, and enhance the beauty and quality of our environment A summary of background data and report findings are pre- sented in Appendix B. The summary forecast of future conditions upon which this Plan is based are discussed in Appendix C. It Should Assess Local Conditions and Solve Problems In general, the present collection and disposal system operates efficiently with few nuisance complaints and a minimum of nuisance conditions. However, during the course of preparing the Plan, some important local problems were identified and assessed: • High incidence of illegal dumping with inadequate means to enforce the laws • Realization of a relatively minor percentage of the recycling potential with high failure rates of, and nuisance conditions developing at, neighborhood recycling centers • Lack of convenient disposal points for residents of the Byron/Brentwood and San Ramon/Danville areas r , II-2 0037 • Inadequate traffic capacity or substandard surfacing of access roads to all of the disposal sites • Land use conflicts between residential areas in Antioch and the Pittsburg/GBF dumps • Adverse public reaction to new landfill sites and a need to identify technically feasible potential sites • Abandonment of dump sites without provision for restoration or lack of an ultimate land use goal • Lack of overall coordination and administration of solid waste management issues II-3 ,?p ° 00346 'L t III. SOME HISTORY Policy Guidance On October 24, 1972, the Contra Costa County Board of Super- visors appointed the 9-member SWMPC to investigate local conditions and to begin and guide the planning process later required under SB-5. The SWMPC was expanded by the Board of Supervisors on October 16, 1973, to 20 members representing a spectrum of interests. The membership of the SWMPC at the time it was dissolved by the Board of Supervisors on December 2, 1975, is shown on pages iii and iv. The SWMPC provided policy guidance and assistance to the consultants in the preparation of the December 1975 Report and the November 1975 Draft of the Plan. Upon completion of these two documents, the SWMPC was dissolved. Following submission of the November 1975 Draft of the Plan to the Board of Supervisors, the Board, on April 27, 1976, established the Contra Costa County Interim Policy Body for Solid Waste Management (IPB) . The IPB was established for the specific purpose of formulating a recommendation to be submitted to the Board of Supervisors on the compostion of a permanent Management Agency which would be responsible for implementing the Plan. On July 27, 1976, the Board of Supervisors assigned additional tasks to the IPB consisting of a review of the comments of the SSWMB on the November 1975 Draft of the Plan and recommendations on revisions to the Plan. The IPB is still active and has recommended that it be recon- stituted as the Solid Waste Coordinating Body (Coordinating Body) and serve as an element of the permanent Management Agency which would recommend directly to the Board of Super- visors on implementation of the Plan (see Chapter VIII, MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM) . III-1 0034'7 11 ilim� Meetings of the SiMMPC and IPB were open to the public. Addi- tionally, the following public forums were held in the west, central, and east county areas specifically to obtain public input. These forums were widely posted throughout the county and received wide coverage in the local newspapers. May 8, 1975 - Contra Costa County Water District in Concord September 2, 1975 - Richmond City Council Chambers in Richmond September 3, 1975 - Liberty Union High School in Brentwood Before submission to the SSWMB, the Board of Supervisors held a Public Hearing on the November 1975 Draft Plan on March 9, 1976, at which time numerous public comments were received. Coordination To ensure compatibility of this countywide plan with other local, county, regional, and state planning efforts, a number of agencies were contacted and many reports were reviewed. All cities and districts were contacted for data input. Coordination meetings were held with adjoining counties on an individual basis and also with regional and state agencies through the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) . The SSWMB staff was questioned from time to time about state policy. Recognition of the state programs for air and water quality was incorporated into the plan using data from the efforts in these fields. Staffs of the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District (BAAPCD) and the California Regional Water III-2 _ �' 00348 Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) , both the San Francisco Bay and the Central Valley Regions, were also consulted periodi- cally during the planning process. Generally, there is an absence of solid waste planning at the city level. However, the planning of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) , which proposes to use solid wastes as a boiler fuel for electrical generation, is of particular significance. III-3 00349 3.x III-3 00349 IV. THE ROLES OF PArRTICIPANTS IN SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT The Homeowners Homeowners have an important role in solid waste management. They pay the bills and expect a high level of service. Homeowners can be an influence in reducing the amount of solid wastes through source reduction, recycling, and other means. The Plan proposes to keep homeowners informed and encourages citizen participation in the planning process. The Collectors and Disposal Site Operators Through their constant involvement with the problems of collecting and disposing of wastes, the collectors and disposal site operators have valuable judgment as to the feasibility of operational and administrative alternatives. As such, their input should be solicited at every level of policy and plan development. The Plan envisions that the private ownership of collection services and disposal site operations continue. ;t is proposed that the present partnership o;' private and public involvement in soZid _aste management continue white a thorough anaZysis is completed by the proposed management agency. Local Government For purposes of solid waste handling, local government can mean either the 15 incorporated cities or the 9 special districts that franchise collection service. Although Contra Costa County has the authority to do so, it does IV-1 � "A 00350 ,y Al not franchise outside these areas. The Plan in no way supersedes or interferes with the ability of the cities or special districts to regulate, franchise, or administer solid waste practices within their corporate or district limits. The Plan was determined to be compatible with the present plans of local government. in 1971 Contra Costa County adopted the Preliminary Refuse Disposal Plan as part of the Utilities Element of the General Plan for Contra Costa County. This plan was developed for an interim timeframe and was to be used while more detailed solid waste planning efforts were completed under SB-5. This Plan complies with goals of the Refuse Disposal Plan and is compatible with the entire County General Plan. iv-2 00351 V. BASIC PLANNING INFORMATION AND DATA Most basic information and data for the Plan were developed in the Report. The chapters and pages listed below from the Report are hereby included in the Plan. Some revisions to the Report are in Appendix G and also incorporated into this Plan. Study Area Characteristics Study Area characteristics are presented in Chapter 3, pages 3-1 through the first paragraph on page 3-20 of the Report. Management, Collection, Haul, and Land Disposal Management, collection, haul, and land disposal are discussed in Chapter 4 of the Report. Quantities, Composition, and Costs of Group 2 Waste Manage- Ment Quantities, compositioa, and costs are discussed in Chapter 5 of the Report. Resource Recovery Resource recovery is presently carried on at neighborhood recycling centers on a continuing basis; at disposal sites on an intermittent basis, depending on the fluctuating secondary materials markets; and at the sources by interested individuals and certain businesses. V-1 00352 The major resource recovery efforts being made in the County are Kaiser "Can-Do" program for aluminum cans and the Los Angeles By-Products Company can recovery installation at Acme Fill. There are also more than 20 recycling centers• throughout the County sponsored by cities, service groups, schools, business, and industry. These centers accept glass, aluminum, newspapers, corrugated paper, and cans. In addition, large retail stores and shopping centers recover corrugated paper. Other industrial firms also recover corrugated paper, as well as shipping pallets and metals. The major recycling activities in Contra Costa County are summarized in Table V-1. The total quantity shown in this table represents less than 2 percent of the total wastes generated. An analysis of potential resource recovery options that were considered in the development of the Physical Facilities Plan (Chapter VI of this Plan) is discussed in Chapter 7, pages 7-5 to 7-21 of the Report. Local market conditions for recvcled materials are discussed in Chapter 7, pages 7-26 to 7-47 of the Report. Chapter 12, pages 12-1 through 12-35 of the Report, discusses alternative Group 2 and 3 waste systems. Processing plants, ferrous metal recovery, and energy recovery facilities had been included in the system that were considered. Table 12-16 of the Report shows estimated costs for alternative Group 2 and 3 systems, except for administrative costs. The recom- mended Physical Facilities Plan is similar to Alternative 4A in Table 12-16 of the Report. V-2 00353 e Y O f O N Pf oNr 9 P ♦ 1 1 f o 1 / O / 1 t � N t r LA G e W O Fi fi c• .+ > O v N t21 E U N e a C6 1 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 q 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 A .^ 0 a 1ik z C-` e H a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 V A ♦ 1 1 1 / 1 • za > GG O e 1•i � C 1 V O v1 P f�O./flf vl .O / 41�O 1q31� -0I f ♦ _ � S - 2� u OI ti .a O Q 1:/ :3 Y 0 C43 O O O Y P .yr �•P P 4• P•. O �.1 r,• -� O O n w w1.n0 L L vvA�+ O O +1 o e tl 4 O aaP r O OOr 7 .H Y e t u u R1.+G a, u u u O Y G Y 4 Y Y Y C•+.G1 u e L O e e 0,,.�•r... 1 C Oma•a ..i G G G L■ uO764 G G / 4u963 S a • ar- cc u tl Q1 a .ei u o r O 1u a e a •e. e e O I E -C - e a -x -us vu c G o > o n �? O a� u o eu ao �r �o u °v a u a e m u $4 ..o c+ a e v •+i yj .� "� -� �• ° S u i Y C �• Y O r C V G ti e a L 0 o f � � � Y O ■- ° O w HG +°+ � v 40 O� Y O-�O Y O E1 4 CC t 0 a aL O u n u=L1 a G u o •G• J 14 a e S a •. r L G 7 T Y a r C T a O a ■ r, 1 U ° ti —va 4 c eT, Tu a rca uT u O e u e a a We We oa0 t tGi Su Ci YJi S S G4 KC 3JtJ 2 V-3 00354 4� �'k f; ,mow�.•,. , Group 1 and Hazardous Wastes Group 1 and hazardous wastes are discussed in Chapter 10, starting on page 10-5 through the first paragraph on page 10-30 of the Report. The solar evaporation disposal method used in the ponds at facilities of the Sierra Reclamation and Disposal, Inc. , and the West Contra Costa Landfill site makes the determination of lifespans difficult. For all practical purposes, the lifespan of the solar evaporation ponds is indefinite due to the small amount of solids contained in the liquid wastes. Several other factors have an as yet unknown effect on the Class I disposal operation at West Contra Costa Landfill: • Litigation with the U.S. army Corps of Engineers e Regulatory efforts of the State Health Department • Requirements of the RWQCB Monitoring measures and/or control provisions for leachate are established by the California RWQCB, San Francisco Bay Region, in a self-monitoring program for each site. These programs include daily records plus monthly or quarterly reporting of waste types and volumes received at the site, quality of water in observation wells surrounding or within the site, observations of surface drainage (i.e. , any surface water in contact with the wastes) , etc. The BAAPCD has a regular monitoring program for the facilities of the Sierra Reclamation and Disposal, Inc., and the West Contra Costa Landfill. The program consists of both analy- tical work based on data from the liquid waste hauler forms and the site operators, as well as field surveillance. V-4 { y O V t)tl J a Special Wastes Special wastes are discussed in Chapter 11, starting on page 11-1 to the first paragraph on page 11-48, and pages 11-50 through 11-57 of the Report. Refer to Appendix.G.for. the section on Septic Tank Pumpings. V-5 0035 VI. RECOMMENDED PHYSICAL FACILITIES PLAN* The County Solid Waste Management Plan (Plan) coordinates a series of interwoven and intradependent programs. Each program addresses state, county, and local goals and signi- ficant local physical problems, and also answers the impor- tant questions as to financing and administration. As required by SB-5 guidelines, the Plan addresses the short- range (1975-1980) , the medium-range (1980-1990) , and long- range (1990-2020) aspects of solid waste management. In developing the various programs that constitute the Plan, it is important to recognize that any alternative course of action, which (1) satisfies state and local goals, (2) is compatible with other planning efforts, and (3) deals with significant local problems, has to be considered and analyzed in depth. The core of the Plan is in the recommended facilities program because: • It exceeds the state and countywide goal of 25 percent volume reduction of wastes being landfilled within the county.** *This Plan represents the recommendations and major findings of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Report prepared by the consulting engineering firm, Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. , Palo Alto, California, in December 1975. The reader is referred to that report for detailed documentation of the basic data and documentation for the Plan. **The East Contra Costa and the West Contra Costa areas have not individually achieved this 25 percent volume reduction. For example, the West Contra Costa area will achieve only a 7 percent volume reduction. VI-1 00357 i • It is in substantial compliance with the planning efforts of the CCCSD. • No new landfills will have to be opened (if the CCCSD energy recovery facility is not implemented Contra Costa County will still have sufficient landfill capacity to the year 2000 ). • Energy and resource recovery from solid wastes is implemented at minimum cost to Contra Costa County citizens. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District is investigating the feasibility of developing an energy recovery facility near the intersection of Interstate 680 and State Highway 4. With the successful completion of the feasibility study, construction will commence and is expected to be completed in .late 1978. When the wastes flowing into Acme Fill exceed the projected requirements of the CCCSD plant (1,010 tons per day) , another energy recovery facility would be built to convert the excess wastes to energy as soon as it becomes economically feasible. The CCCSD energy recovery facility represents the cornerstone of the recommended facilities. The CCCSD is presently negotiating a contract with the Acme Fill Corporation for the quantity of municipal refuse needed for their energy recovery facility. The Acme Fill Corpora- tion operates the landfill site adjacent to the CCCSD facility. Use of this landfill will minimize haul distance. In particular, it is recommended that the Management Agency immediately investigate the feasibility of regional solutions which further resource recovery; for example, energy recovery in the West Contra Costa County area. Consideration should also be given to intercounty coordination in combining solid waste facilities and operations in the Contra Costa County and Northern Alameda County areas in order to obtain more VI-2 E 00358 MW economical and efficient collection and disposal of solid wastes, for example, by decreasing the haul distance in the West Contra Costa area. Input should be provided to the San Francisco Bay Area Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery Study to ensure consideration of West Contra Costa County's problems. The flow of solid wastes within Contra Costa County is currently interjurisdictional. Furthermore, wastes from southern Marin County, Benicia (Solano County) , and commercial wastes from Berkeley (Alameda County) are disposed of at landfills in Contra Costa County. Wastes from the Crockett area are exported to Vallejo. There are no known existing legal barriers to this flow, and by adopting the Plan, a city cannot erect such a barrier. Cost-effective solutions to solid waste management problems are more easily achieved when barriers are not imposed between political jurisdictions. In the event it is determined that barriers are needed, they can be erected only by revising the adopted Plan. This Physical Facilities Plan does not preclude Contra Costa County from participating in any subregional or regional resource recovery systems, such as the Bay-Delta Resource Recovery Project, if and when they are demonstrated to be feasible. VI-3 00359 4 The facilities and their locations are shown in Figure VI-1; schematics showing the materials for the various subareas and facilities sizes are shown in Figures VI-2 through VI-4. The following subarea designations are used in this Plan (as shown in Figure B-1): W:-N West-North W-E Nest-East W-S West-South C-N Central-North C-C Central-Central C-h Central-{Vest C-S Central-South E-N East-North E-E East-East E-S East-South Capital funding for the various aspects of the Plan are discussed in Chapter I1, Financing Program, on page IY-3. Physical facilities and changes to the present operations are as follows (Figure VI-1): • Transfer stations to be built in the San Ramon, Pittsburg/ Antioch, and Byron areas • Processing/resource recovery facilities are.proposed to be built in the Pittsburg area and at the West Contra Costa Landfill and Acme Fill sites that would recover 30 to 70 tons per day, respectively, of ferrous metals in the short- range • An energy recovery facility to be built by CCCSD at its wastewater treatment plant by 1975 and a county-wide energy recovery facility is proposed to be built in the east County area for converting the combustible portion of processed municipal solid wastes into electricity VI-4 00360 SNORT-RANGE __1 1975-1980 l LEGEND �-^��•�`': _` -= — r-- j - W. , TRANSFER STATION ; MEDIUM RANGE Rasa-1s90 PROCESSING STATION r ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY SANITARY LANDFILL 74— LONG —LONG RANGE 1990-2020 FIGURE VI -1 , THE RECOMMENDED PLAN PHYSICAL FACILITIES vi 00361 IECOtE1E1 FEIIOIS NETItS i` l� aI1EGT rill Of EST CO, CI Tll TEST III-FRICESSIIEE rtllr Cavort lasits 1litElt FIICEifIN , >>T J EST CONTIL COST; urIFILL 423 Tt9 WEST 2ECOtEIEI FEIIONS NETILS �e II/ECT 9101,IF cN NON-t1OCESSIILE CC 761 TAO ACNE WANES Cl 1`10CESS1l0 MAN iilTlO '' 90 fit% JJJ 1 J'J 0 90 ill !Alai TIAISFE CS TPO St TIONN ACNE FILL CCCI9 IEMIE 119 Ttl ENE16T IECOTEIT lla ttO El 229 i1TTSIaIL TRANSFER o EE Ttl STATION 0 Es (slot GXEITION TPO -TONS PER OAT 10 TPI 6 CENTRAL b EAST COUNTY FIGURE VI -2. SCHEMATIC SOLID WASTE FLOW DIAGRAM RECOM?AENDED PLAN-SHORT RANGE (1975-1980) VI-6 ', 00362 lECitEtEa FE111I2 NETILS 1% 111E9T NEIL IF 21 to. 411 US MY 011410CESSWE 11110 CSINT1 r1STE2 ALAUS FRICESSll 481", •,+ FSI C96TIA C2:T USIFILL 4113 its ■EST ItclitlEO 1E1/0/2•ET►ts littet lilt OF 1100-tIOCtItIlLE _t 1110 its 1C0E visits Ct tirtESiil9 2lltrr stEtlar o Jli r q t2t 2111 limit CS TTa 2t►titN " EC1E FILL this IESISSE !il in E0EN9T lECatElt tit Sta LN ISa 1,!11:1019 ir►rirta EE It :iEilrl e Es is limit —TONS PER OAT aloTM IO2E: CENTPAL L EAST COUNTY FIGURE VI -3. SCHEMATIC SOLID WASTE FLOW DIAGRAM RECOMMENDED PLAN-MEDIUM RANGE (1980-1990) VI-7 00363 IECOTEtE/ 211ECT &AWL IF FE11/9S 2ETILS I/2-F&110ESSIALE b WASTES IESi WEST tO. III TAW COIrTI o WA111 r1OCESSIIS &fSl USEDt7f 1E1 STATI&I 142 T►O REIT C11Y111 COSTA LAIVILL 135 TFO IECITE112 FE1112S METALS `tie b WIIECT 111L OF Cl ME �a 2111-►lOCESSIDLE cc c0 TATt Trt FIOCES110 WASTES Stull STAT14a lftf.af A 4 b AM FILL .. 1150 TF1 Zan TPA SA1 lite& o CCCSO lL1\t0L ti TRUISM MIST A\t its %Title% 3 tEWTEIt 4 IECOTEtto FE1101S PETALS ti 'sb ab � bw �b FTTTS141 4~ EE ST/ trt AICCESSI2S STATIAI lay rri SOMME o £lE1tt FACILITT 10 TAA WT111 1111 TFO ES Its? TPO-TONT PER OAT sells FIGURE VI-4. SCHEMATIC SOLID WASTE FLOW DIAGRAM RECOMMENDED PLAN-LONG RANGE (1990-2020) vT-8 auds I . .. + ,....^..^.. "�. :r::.et .,•..<x t-. 3 ,.. ..:h a ..:.... .. .. ... ,. n... s ., .F. ..kr. "� 4'. r.T:.; Transfer Stations These are buildings placed in areas that are remote from the disposal sites. Wastes from collection vehicles are deposited at the stations and then loaded onto transfer trucks for the trip to a disposal site or processing facility. The use of transfer stations offers the following advantages: 1. The transfer trucks are large enough to haul the wastes from four or five collection vehicles; thus, traffic is reduced on all major thorough- fares and fuel is conserved. 2. The stations provide lower cost and more convenient disposal points to local residents. 3. Because the sites of transfer stations are more convenient, significant reductions should occur in illegal dumping in the service areas. 4. The stations can be combined with voluntary recycling activities to provide one-stop disposal and recycling, minimizing overall costs and the potential for nuisance conditions. Processing Stations Processing is 're first step in large-scale, centralized resource recovery. At processing stations, wastes will be deposited and passed through a shredder. Ferrous metals will then be magnetically separated. At the Acme Fill site, this shredded waste will be air classified. A portion of the light fraction will be used as fuel for the CCCSD facility. The heavy fraction consists of non-ferrous metals, glass, dirt, and rocks from which aluminum can be removed. VI-9 _ 0036-5 This processing facility at Acme Fill is essential to the operation of the CCCSD facility, but processing at the West Contra Costa Landfill (Richmond) would remove only the ferrous metals. As with transfer stations, processing facilities offer some advantages that offset their costs: 1. Equipment necessary to recover other metals, glass, or any other commodity, can be easily added when market conditions so warrant. 2. The residue from processing is easier to handle, has less potential for odors and blowing paper, and does not require daily cover when landfilled. Thus, the disposal costs should be decreased. 3. There will be a resulting increase in the life of the landfills because the residues are more easily compacted to higher density. 4. The light fraction is combustible and has a potential for sale as fuel or for use in other processes. S. Processing facilities are an important step toward achieving the county goal of ". .. .enhance- ment of the beauty and quality of our environ- ment." Energy Recovery In the short range, by burning the combustible fraction from the Acme processing station, the CCCSD facility will convert the heat to steam and the steam to electricity for use in the wastewater reclamation plant. In the long range, a countywide energy recovery facility will be built to convert the increased waste volume to energy. These faci- lities, too, offer advantages: • They eliminate the need for new landfills. • They allow utilization of the resource potential in the wastes. VI-10 } 00366 ,F VII. OTHER SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS While the facilities plan is the most important element of a solid waste management plan, facilities alone cannot meet all of the goals or solve all of the problems. To be complete, the plan must include programs that deal with all aspects of the solid waste management. Source Reduction Program Package legislation--the control of waste generation by prohibiting certain types of containers--is the most popular form of source reduction. Because of a number of legal barriers and potential economic hardships, however, this type of program would be of marginal effectiveness at the County level. County and local government should urge and support state or national legislation that reduces the solid waste stream. Another approach is the use of economic incentives to encourage the reuse of containers. A program currently underway in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (by Red Owl Stores, Inc.) , may have local applicability. Cash refunds are offered for egg cartons, shopping bags, and milk containers returned to the stores, either for reuse by the stores or repacking of the customers' purchases. Because the refunds offered are equal to the purchase value of new containers, no extra costs are incurred. Local commercial enterprises that wish to participate in such a program should be encouraged to do so, providing there are no health risks involved. Vii-1 g 00367 I =Moor Source Separation Program Source separation is the most efficient means of recovering materials (especially paper) from solid wastes, and it is most successful when prices being paid by the secondary materials markets are high. At those times, there are sufficient economic incentives for source separation to be conducted on a voluntary basis. A number of studies have concluded that high rates of participation are necessary for a successful program and that the highest rates occur when programs are long range (in excess of 12 months) . This requires ti;at long-range markets be contracted before the program begins or serious operating deficits can occur. Because most programs require a separate collection vehicle for the separated newsprint, glass, and metals, high-density urban areas have the highest probability of recovering sufficient materials to offset the additional costs. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) presently requires federal offices with 100 or more personnel to separate waste paper in a "desk top" program. If this program succeeds, it could have widespread applicability within the Countv. EPA also has recently begun source separation feasi- bility studies on the use of compartmentalized trucks in two Massachusetts cities. If this program succeeds, the results of these studies should be analyzed for applicability in Contra Costa County. Franchising authorities should inves- tigate the possibility of a local resource recovery program, and perhaps could obtain an EPA grant to do so. VII-2 00368 J }a Storage Program The Board of Supervisors, in cooperation with the Coordinating Body and the Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee, will review the solid waste ordinances of the County, cities, and special districts for compliance with the State Minimum Standards by July 1, 1977. In this regard, the County, the cities, and special districts should review their individual solid waste ordinances for compliance with the State Minimum Standards and revise them, if necessary. Adoption of the State Minimum Standards for Storage and Collection should eliminate (or reduce to nonnuisance levels) the few existing storage problems. The enforcement of requirements for leakproof containers with sealed lids as required in these standards should eliminate fly propagation problems so that more expensive solutions, such as twice ;weekly collection, will not have to be implemented. Nuisance or hazardous storage conditions should be reported by the collectors to the enforcement officials. The franchised collector shall have the right to comment on any proposed developments within his service area concerning adequate provisions for the safe storage of solid wastes and economical collection access. He should recommend appropriate changes if necessary. Collection Program As with the storage program, all ordinances should be reviewed for compliance with the State Minimum Standards by the Board of Supervisors, in cooperation with the Coordinating VII-3 00369 �i n"T r.-•r ni ttige, �k Body and the Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee, and updated as necessary by the responsible agency. Dissimilar collection standards do not present a problem in Contra Costa County. They are necessary because of the variable geography of the County. As recommended by the SWMPC: The County should franchise collection in all unincorporated areas not now franchised by cities or special districts. This is to clarify the responsibility for franchising collection in unincorporated areas; however, cities should be allowed to franchise within their spheres of influence if legally empowered to do so. Because collection constitutes 70 percent of the cost associated with the solid waste system, franchising author- ities should consider the adoption of one or more of the following cost control recommendations. • Curbside pickup of containers, which greatly reduces labor time (hence cost) and is used in approximately half of all American cities. • The use of easy-to-handle paper bags that conform to the statewide Minimum Standards, which can result in a storage and collection system that is more sanitary, less noisy, and less costly than the present metal container system. • Mandatory collection provisions that minimize the use of law enforcement officials (e.g., the program in Richmond) should be considered for adoption in any ordinance upgrading. Such provisions could have a positive impact on reducing illegal dumping problems. VII-4 09370 Recycling Center Program Centralized resource recovery processing equipment is discussed in detail under the Physical Facilities Plan. However, for those areas where the necessary equipment for processing is not feasible, the support of "neighborhood" recycling centers is encouraged for all franchising authori- ties. The most successful efforts currently underway in Contra Costa County, E.C. Ology in E1 Cerrito and Many Hands in Antioch, receive local citizen and government encouragement and thus have correspondingly high rates of participation. Also, the adoption of operational standards (e.g. , those proposed on pages 7-53 and 7-54 of the Report) would help to reduce the nuisance conditions and failure rates associated with *hese enterprises. Local government could institute "desk top" paper recycling operations similar to those required for federal agency offices (:ederaZ Register, Vol. 41, No. E0, April 23, 1976) . In addition, the county should support legislation requiring materials for local government consumption to be recycled or contain some minimum percentage of recycled materials. Such programs have been proposed at the state level and would help stabilize market prices. Group 1 and Hazardous Waste Program Hazardous wastes are presently being administered by the State of California, under authority of Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 25100) of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code. The SWMPC recommends that no local controls be established at this time. However, the Plan envisions that site operators be required to submit to the VII-5 003'71 M-n-ty-v^ntfi "rr r . t n t . . ,;. Management Agency by 1980 long-range site development and closure plans which shall show the ultimate land use of the Class I sites. Special Waste Program These wastes present special problems with respect to storage, collection, or disposal. As such, a subprogram is appropriate for each category of special wastes: aban- doned vehicles, agricultural wastes, bulk materials, litter, medical wastes, septic tank pumpings, sewage sludges, street sweepings and catchbasin debris, and tires. 1. Abandoned Vehicles. The County and remaining cities should join the California Highway Patrol's Abandoned Vehicle Abatement (AVA) Program. As of May 1975, the cities of Antioch, Clayton, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek were the only participating entities. Of an estimated 2,200 automobiles removed in the County in 1974, only 230 were removed under the AVA program and paid for out of the AVA Trust Fund. The remainder were removed at local government or private citizen expense. 2. Agricultural Wastes. The state has adopted agricultural solid waste management standards governing the prevention of nuisance conditions from confined animals, manures, carcasses, and the disposal of agricultural production residues. These standards should be reviewed for applica- bility by all franchising authorities. There are no present problems with agricultural solid waste practices in the County. The only potential problem identified during the report investigation was that an end to the practice of burnina the estimated 14,000 annual tons of stubble and orchard trimmings could create a disposal crisis for farmers. A countywide agricultural composting operation is recommended as a means of converting a potential problem into a useful byproduct. VII-6 00372 3. Bulky Materials. These are large appliances and furniture. To minimize the possibility of unsightly storage or illegal dumping of those items, a once-per-year cleanup program should be included in every franchise area, as is presently done in some Contra Costa cities. 4. Litter. The anti-litter program currently in effect at the County level is an excellent one. However, cities should consider coordinating their anti-litter programs through their neigh- boring cities and the County litter control officer. Also, more emphasis should be placed on programs that involve young people in long- range litter prevention programs. Litter control planning at the County level and the route assignment responsibility of the litter patrol should be transferred to the enforcement agency. This would give the litter control officer more time to investigate and enforce violations of the illegal dumping ordinances. 5. Medical Waste. Small medical facilities, clinics, and rest homes should combine their resources to incinerate their pathogenic wastes, or as an alternative, transport them to a facility with the proper disposal equipment. Internal handling procedures should be upgraded according to EPA recommendations. 6. Septic Tank Pumpings. Land disposal should be discouraged. These wastes shall be hauled to the nearest approved sewage treatment plant or designated disposal facility. 7. Sewage Sludges. Residual solids from sewage treatment plants should be land disposed until such time as other methods become available. 8. Street Sweepings and Catchbasin Debris. Significant volume reductions can be effected in autumn if leaves and other biological debris could be shredded, composted, and used as a soil amendment in parks, medians, and citizens' yards or gardens. Local governments should investigate the cost effectiveness of this method when compared with hauling and landfill disposal of these wastes. 9. Tires. Tires are particularly difficult to bury successfully in landfills and occupy a large volume. They also represent VII-7 OU3'73 t I 1 F one of the more obnoxious illegal dumping problems. By 1980, an estimated 2 million tires annually will have to be disposed of in Contra Costa County landfills if present trends continue. When shredded, the nui- sance factors of tires become insignificant, and the shredded rubber can be burned as fuel or reworked into useful products. The cost of shredding is estimated to be a nominal 10 cents per tire. For these reasons, the installation of tire shredders at the West Contra Costa Landfill and at the Acme Fill site should be encouraged. Disposal Site Program Access. Problems exist with respect to access roads to the disposal sites. Roads to the sites are structurally inade- quate for the weight of the trucks. Arthur Road, the access to Acme Fill Corporation and the facilities of the Sierra Reclamation and Disposal,Inc., presents a serious safety problem because it passes through a residential area. With the closure of the east County dumps and subsequent diversion of the wastes to Acme Fill, the situation will worsen. To deal with the problems, it is recommended that: • The access roads to West Contra Costa Landfill be resurfaced • A feasibility study of an improved access road to Acme Fill/Sierra Reclamation and Disposal sites be conducted and a solution be expedited West Contra Costa Landfill and Acme Fill. It is recommended that the West Contra Costa Landfill and the Acme Fill con- tinue to upgrade their operations to meet statewide Minimum Standards. Compliance with RWQCB discharge specifications, BAAPCD requirements, all the local ordinances, and operating permits, if required, are expected to continue. v VIZ-8 003'74 k �6, ii x The construction of the processing stations in the recommended Plan will do much to aid in these efforts and goals. The shredded wastes have a much lower possibility of developing nuisance conditions than do unprocessed municipal wastes. Long-range site development and closure plans that show the ultimate land use for the sites should be prepared by the operators and submitted to the appropriate authority by 1980. Possible reclamation of finished areas should be included in the plan. Pittsburg/GBF Dumps. The operators of these sites shall submit closure plans to the appropriate jurisdictional agencies by 1978 that show: (1) the final elevations of the surface, (2) the depth of final soil cover proposed to be applied, (3) the vegetative cover proposed, and (4) pro- visions to protect the quality of the surface runoff waters and the waters percolating through the buried wastes. Other Considerations. Areas for further studies could include a determination of alternative plans of action with respect to landfill operations (for example, restoration of the land overlying the Old Antioch Dump to beneficial use and feasibility studies of the potential sites identified in the Report should continue) . Also, the methane recovery feasibility study for the Mountain View disposal site (Santa Clara County) can be reviewed periodically for applicability to Contra Costa County landfills--whether closed or operating. VII-9 00375 f VIII. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION PROGRAM The SSWMB "Guidelines for the Preparation of County Solid Waste Management Plans" of February 1974 require that each County Plan "shall provide for an organizational structure to administer the plan." Chapter 14 of the Report, prepared by Bartle Wells Associates under subcontract to Metcalf & Eddy Engineers, Inc. , comprehensively discusses the various organ- izational structures. Three general alternative organiza- tional structures under which the Plan could be administered are listed on Page 14-6 of the Report. They are: • Adapt the present system • A single new special district • Joint Powers Agency (JPA) On April 27, 1976, the Board of Supervisors established the IPB. This body was charged with the responsibility of repor- ting back to the Board of Supervisors with respect to a recommendation on a "permanent solid waste management agency" which could administer and implement the Plan. The member- ship of the IPB is shown on page ii. The first meeting of the IPB was held on June 4, 1976. The IPB met on several occasions thereafter, and, using material furnished by the County Public Works Department as a basis, explored the various ramifications of using the general alternatives shown above. The material furnished was organized around six functions which are identified in the SSWMB guidelines. The guidelines require that the functions "must be assigned and performed within the framework of the selected administrative VI-TI-1 003'76 s; arrangements." The functions are: • Policy making • Public information • Budgeting • Planning • Adoption and enforcement of ordinances and standards • Management and operation of the system On July 15, 1976, the IPB voted to recommend to the Board of Supervisors to "adapt the present system" as the organ- izational structure for the administration and implementation of the County's Plan as follows: Preserve the existing administrative structure, rationalize and streamline the division of responsibilities, incorporate the necessary new assignments within that structure, and form an advisory committee similar to the IPB which should be appointed by the Board of Supervisors to assist the County in its deliberations. On August 19, 1976, the IPB unanimously passed the following motion: in addition to recommending adaption of the existing system for the structure of the permanent management agency, it is further recommended that within six months from the final adoption and approval of the Plan by the State, a report will be generated through the Coordinating Body recommending further modifi- cation of the structure of the management agency that includes a countywide JPA, adaption of the existing system, or other such entities deemed appropriated. Figure VIII-1 shows the organizational structure of the Management Agency that will be used in implementing the Plan. VIII-Z 00377 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS * SOLID WASTE COORDINATING BODY (including the Consumer Rep.) * (TECHNICAL ADVISORY CON1ITTEE County Public Works Private Special Department District Industry Staffs (Solid Waste) County Administrator's City Staffs Office County County Counsel's Health Office Department Sheriff's County Department Planning Department *Staffed by County Public harks Department FIGURE VIII-i . MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN VIZI-3 T r � Y F The present IPB would be designated as the Coordinating Body. Its prime responsibility would be consideration of policy with respect to solid waste management and the recommending of such policy and all technical matters to the County Board of Supervisors for adoption. In addition to the Coordinating Body, a Technical Advisory Committee would be created. The principal function of the Technical Advisory Committee would be to serve as liaison and to coordinate with the various city and special district staffs and County departments in arriving at recommendations to the Coordinating Body for its consideration and possible recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. The following pages outline under each function the various tasks that would have to be verformed in the course of the implementation of the Plan and the particular element of the Management Agency that will be responsible for each task. Policy Making Policy making would be the basic function that would be performed relative to coordination of countywide efforts on solid waste management. The Board of Supervisors, acting upon recommendations submitted by the Coordinating Body, would be responsible for setting overall policy within the County, provided, however, that such policy would not inter- fere with the ability of the cities or special districts to regulate, franchise, or administer solid waste practices within their corporate or district limits. The cities, special districts, and private industry will be responsible for setting policy on specific operations performed within their territory or programs coming directly under their jurisdiction. VIII-4 003'79 I Task Responsibility 1. Revise and update the The Board of Supervisors will County Solid Waste Manage- be responsible for revising ment Plan at 3-year maximum and updating the County Plan. intervals. The Plan shall At the appropriate time, the be revised at anv time upon Board will direct the County request by any public Public works Department to agency. commence work in cooperation with the various city and special district staffs and County departments. All such work will be performed with the guidance of the Coordina- ting Body and the Technical Advisory Committee and will be submitted to the Coordina- ting Body for their review and possible modification prior to the submittal to the Board of Supervisors. Upon Board approval, the Plan will be sent to the cities within the County for their required approval before being forwar- ded to the SSWMB. 2. Coordinate countywide This task will be performed efforts with respect to by the Public works Department programs listed under the and/or city and special dis- "Planning" function. trict staffs, various county departments, and private industry under the guidance of the Ccordinating Body and the Technical Advisory Commit- tee. From time to time, as required, progress reports will be submitted to the Coordina- ting Body for their considera- tion of submission of the planning to the Board of Supervisors and the SSWMB. 3. Set policy on collection This task will be the respon- services and the franchi- sibility of the cities, special sing of collection ser- districts, and the County for vices. areas within their jurisdic- tion. Y, t VIII-5 00380 � E7 y l3 G Task Responsibility 4. Regulate solid waste Within the incorporated areas, disposal sites. this task will be the respon- sibility of the city enforce- ment agencies and the state and regional regulatory agencies. Within unincorpora- ted areas, this task will be the responsibility of the Board of Supervisors enforce- ment agency and state and regional regulatory agencies. Public Information A public information system will be instituted so that the public may more readily obtain information on solid waste services. Also, an education system would be developed to inform the public about problems relating to solid waste and as to how it can participate in possible programs, such as source reduction, recycling, etc. Task Responsibility 1. Provide information on the This wask will be the respon- County Plan. sibility of the County Public Works Department. 2. Prepare, update, and This task will be the respon- periodically distribute an sibility of the Board of informational brochure Supervisors acting through describing: the Public Works Department with the County Public Infor- a. Available collection mation Officer serving as and disposal services consultant and working in b. Costs of services cooperation with the city and c. Methods of source special district staffs and reduction the other various County d. Proper recycling departments and private methods for the area interests. In special instan- e. Other programs relative ces, the cities and special to solid waste districts may choose to issue their own brochure covering a special program or operation under their jurisdiction. VIII-6 z 00381 Task Responsibility 3. Provide specific infor- This task will be the respon- mation on solid waste sibility of the cities, services available in the special districts, the County, County, when requested. and private operators. Budgeting Budgeting for a task that is the responsibility of a parti- cular entity shall be performed by that entity. Budgeting may be done in cooperation with other entities and/or with private industry. Task Responsibility 1. Prepare the fiscal year This task will be the respon- budgets, proposed expen- sibility of the cities, ditures, and funds to be special districts, and the made available. County for each operation for which the public entity is financially responsible. 2. Analyze alternative finan- cing methods (direct charges, bonds) a. Determine financing This task will be performed by needs for new programs the responsible entity or in cooperation with other enti- ties, as the situation dictates. b. Determine if existing This task will be performed by methods are providing the cities, special districts, sufficient administra- and the County, and will take tive funds into consideration assumption of new programs and new res- ponsibilities. C. Recommend revenue This task will be the responsi- allocation of possible bility of the Board of Super- "disposal surcharge visors in cooperation with the fees" cities and special districts if a disposal surcharge fee is decided on to finance adminis- trative costs. (See Financing Program, Chapter IX.) VIII-7 "' 00382 Planning Countywide planning will be an ongoing responsibility of the Board of Supervisors. Such planning will be performed by the County Public Works Department in cooperation with city and special district staffs, the various County departments, and private industry under the guidance of the Coordinating Body and the Technical Advisory Committee. The planning will be submitted to the Coordinating Body for review and possible modification. All such planning will be conducted in close liaison with the SSWMB and will be submitted to the Board of Supervisors for their approval and then for final approval by the SSWbIB. The cities and/or special districts may work directly with the Technical Advisory Committee and the SSWMB in special instances, such as the development of a program on source separation, recycling centers, etc. Task Responsibility - 1. Plans for disposal sites Within incorporated areas of the cities, the planning for disposal sites will also be the responsibility of the cities working in cooperation with the Board of Supervisors, the Coordinating Body, Technical Advisory Committee, SSWMB, RWQCBs, Bay Area Air Pollution Control Board, and local and State Health Departments. Within the unincorporated areas, this task will be per- formed by the Board of Super- visors acting through the County Public Works Department working with city and special district staffs and the various County departments, the Coordinating Body, Techni- cal advisory Committee, SSWMB, RWQCBs, Bay Area Air Pollution Control Board, and local and State Health Departments. This VIII-8 00383 Task Responsibility 1. Plans for disposal will include a survey of sites (concluded) present operating procedures at existing disposal sites for conformance with State Minimum Standards. 2. Implement special Responsibility for implemen- programs: ting any one of the special programs will be the responsi- a. Transfer stations bility of a city, a special b. Processing stations district, or the County. It C. Transportation may also be the joint responsi- d. Energy recovery bility of a combination of two facilities or more of these entities and e. Source reduction private industry. More speci- f. Source separation fically, a transfer station g. Storage may become the responsibility h. New methods of of one or more cities in coop- collection eration with the County and i. Recycling centers private industry. An energy j. Group 1 and hazardous recovery facility could also wastes be sponsored in this manner. k. Abandoned vehicles In any event, the planning for 1. Agricultural wastes such facilities and programs m. Bulky materials will be conducted in close n_ Litter liaison with the Board of o. Medical wastes Supervisors, the Coordinating p. Septic tank pumpings Body, and the Technical q. Sewage sludges Advisory Committee. r. Street sweepings and catchbasin debris S. Tires t. Disaster, Post- Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction Program (civil or natural disasters, including earthquakes) 3. Contingency program The Board of Supervisors in cooperation with the cities, special districts, the Coor- dinating Body, and the Techni- cal Advisory Committee will be responsible for developing contingency programs. VIII-9 . . _ 00384 i Task Responsibility 4. Consider assessing the The Board of Supervisors, in feasibility of partici- cooperation with the cities, pating in programs such special districts, public and as the Bay Delta Resource private interest will perform Recovery Program. this task. Adoption and Enforcement of Ordinances and Standards Ordinances and standards will be adopted and enforced by public agencies for each particular operation or program falling under their jurisdiction. State and regional require- ments will be recognized in the adoption and enforcement of all ordinances and standards. SSWMB health related standards will be enforced by the local health entities. Solid waste management standards that are not health related will be enforced by the cities in the incorporated areas, the special districts within their fran- chise jurisdictions, and by the County Health Department in the remaining unincorporated area of the County. Task Responsibility 1. Determine County, munici- The Board of Supervisors in pality, and special dis- cooperation with the Coordi- trict ordinance compliance nating Body and the Technical with the State Minimum Advisory Committee will be Standards for Handling responsible for this task. and Disposal. 2. Revise existing ordinances The cities, special districts, and standards to meet new and/or the Board of Supervisors conditions (State Standards will perform this task in became effective July 1, cooperation with the Coordina- 1976) . ting Body and the Technical Advisory Committee. 3. Adopt new ordinances for Same as Task 2 above. disposal sites, transfer stations, and processing stations. VIII-10 r ,' 00385 } Task Responsibility 4. Enforce local ordinances and state standards for handling and disposing of solid wastes in order to meet: a. Regulations for solid Local health entities will waste handling, stor- enforce health related ordi- age, and disposal nances and standards. related to health. b. Regulations for solid waste handling, stor- age, and disposal not related to health. (1) Maintain a surveil- In incorporated areas, the lance program and cities' enforcement agencies enforce solid waste will be responsible for storage and collec- enforcement of ordinances and tion regulations. standards. The special dis- tricts will be responsible for (2) License and inspect this enforcement within their vehicles and equip- franchised areas, and the Board went for compli- of Supervisors through the ance with applica- County Health Department will ble standards. be responsible for the remain- ing areas. (3) Require, review, In incorporated areas, the and approve site cities, in cooperation with closure plans sub- the Board of Supervisors, the ject to local Coordinating Body, and the agency direction Technical Advisory Committee, on land use. will perform this task. The Board of Supervisors, acting upon recommendations of the Coordinating Body and the Technical Advisory Committee, will perform this task in the unincorporated area. 5. Regulate the handling and This task is the responsibility disposal of Group 1 and of the applicable federal and hazardous wastes. state agencies. The State De- partment of Health is urged to develop an adequate program with local health department participation in conjunction with the SSWMB. VIII-11 00385 Management and Operation of the System In Contra Costa County, private industry operates the disposal sites and the collection system. Central Contra Costa Sani- tary District has proposed an energy recovery facility that will provide the major part of the countywide resource recovery effort. The Plan envisions that operation of all solid waste facilities will remain in the private sector. Energy recovery facilities or recycling centers may be opera- ted by the public or private sector. Task Responsibility 1. Collection system Private industry will be responsible for operating the collection system. 2. Disposal sites program Same as Task 1 above. 3. Energy recovery program Central Contra Costa Sanitary District will continue to ex- plore the feasibility of their proposed energy recovery faci- lity and place the facility in operation as soon as possible if it proves feasible. The recommended Long-Range Plan (1990) also proposes another energy recovery facility in the east county area. 4. Group 1 and hazardous Private industry will be wastes program responsible for this program. 5. Litter control program The County Sheriff's Department will perform this task in the unincorporated area; the cities in the incorporated areas. 6. New methods of collection Private industry or others will be responsible for this program. VT_II-12 00387 �a Task Responsibility 7. Recycling centers program Cities, special districts, or the County in cooperation with interested civic groups and/or private industry will be re- sponsible for this program. 8. Pursue the San Francisco The East Bay Municipal Utility Bay Area Wastewater Solids District, Central Contra Costa Study (3-year Sewage Sanitary District, City and Sludge Program) . County of San Francisco, City of San Jose, and the Bay Area Sewer Services Agency or its successor will be responsible for this program. 9. Review existing and pro- The SSWMB is responsible for posed plans and programs determining the conformance of for conformance with the new plans and programs with Pian: the Plan. Cities, special dis- tricts, and the County will also be responsible for this task. a. Determine which exis- The cities, special districts, ting programs should and/or the Board of Supervisors be modified and which will perform this task. new programs should be initiated. b. Form an implementa- Same as Task 9a above. tion schedule for each program. c. Coordinate countywide The Board of Supervisors, implementation with through the Coordinating Body respect to programs. and the Technical Advisory Committee, will work with the cities, special districts, and the County in performing this task. 10. Set operating and service The cities, special districts, standards, and consider and the County will perform the need for lifeline this task. service. VIZI_-13 00388 �: -7Tr 0117 u; Task Responsibility 11. Close the Pittsburg Dump. Private industry, the City of Pittsburg, and the Board of Supervisors will perform this task. 12. Review the Management The Board of Supervisors, upon Agency structure--(See recommendation of the Coordi- the last paragraph on nating Body, will perform this page VIII-2) . task. Summary of Management and Administration Program Solid waste collection and disposal operations in Contra Costa County will continue to be performed by the private sector. The CCCSD will continue to explore the feasibility of its energy recovery facility and, if feasible, will place the facility in operation as soon as possible. The intent of the Plan is that it will not interfere with the ability of the cities or special districts to regulate, franchise, or administer solid waste practices within their corporate or district limits. The adaption of the present system as outlined in this chapter meets the requirements on assigned functions as set forth in the SSWMB guidelines for policy making, public information, budgeting, planning, adoption and enforcement of ordinances and standards, and management and operation of the system. The structure of the Management Agency recognizes the importance of communication in the continuing planning process with respect to existing solid waste operations and also new special programs. Most importantly, the Solid Waste Coordinating Body, which will be representative of many diverse interests of the County, will have a strong voice in the planning process by way of recommending directly to the Board of Supervisors. VIII-14 00389 Lastly, it sets up a mechanism for financing the various administrative tasks that will have to be accomplished in the administration and implementation of the Plan. VIII-15 00390 IX. FINANCING PROGRAM The Financing Program of the Plan is divided into two separate categories--Administrative Costs and Capital Costs (see Tables IX-1 and IX-2, respectively) . Furthermore, the program reflects the basic assumption that each entity is responsible for financing each solid waste function being performed under its jurisdiction and that such financing provides for any: 1. Present program 2. Future program it is proposing to implement 3. Administrative costs associated with these functions and programs Administrative Costs General overall solid waste administrative costs for each public entity would appear as line items in the annual fiscal year budget of these entites. On the other hand, administrative costs that can truly be considered to be countywide in nature would be financed from means still to be determined. Examples of such costs would be the costs for revising and updating the Plan, County Health Department inspection costs (collection vehicles, licensed disposal sites, drop boxes, and complaints) , and the costs of meetings of the Solid Waste Coordinating Body and the Technical Advisory Committee. The Solid Waste Coordinating Body is charged with developing a report and presenting it to the Board of Supervisors by April 1, 1977. The report will consider the desirability IX-1 00391 Table IX-1. FINANCING OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Annual Administrative Costs 1975 Dollars Short range Medium range Long range Function or task (1975-1990) (1961-1990) (1591-2000) Policy making $ 36,000 $ 54,000- $ 72,000 Public information 3,0G0 4,500 6,000 Budgeting 1,000 1,500 2,000 Planning 3,200 4,800 6,400 AdoPtion and enforcement of ordinances and standards 146,500 220,000 293,000 Management and operation of the system C 0 0 Total $169,700 $284,600 $379,400 Nlotes: 1. All costs shown an this table would be financed by a method to be determined from the following (see page IX-4): (1) disposal surcharge tee, (2) counviWide ad valorem tax, (3) sales tax, (4) federal or state grants-in-aid, cr (5) any combination of the aforementioned. 2. Annual maintenance and operation costs for the CCCSD energy recovery :acility shall be the responsibility of CCCSD. These costs are: short range, $0.00; medium range, $1,635,000; long range, $2,616,000. IX-2 ti �' `t 00392 II+7h,y a i:. Table IX-2. FINANCING SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Capital Costs Thousands of Dollars Short range Medium range Long range Facility (1975-1980) (1981-1990) (1991-2020) Acme processing plant, $ 7,012 -- -- 760 tons/day (less (6,135) 87.5% grant, plus land and rights-of-way)a Enlarge Acme planta 2,768 $ 500 $ 2,100 CCCSD energy 25,294 2,950b -- conversion, 760 tons/day (22,132) (less 87.5% grant)a West County 2,800 300 1,100 processing plantc Pittsburg-Antioch 720 150 1,300 transfer stationc Bvron transfer stationc 25 -- — San Ramon transfer 520 100 300 stationc Countywide energy — 34,000 plant Total (less grants) $10,872 $4,000 $39,300 a. CCCSD would be responsible for providing capital funds. b. Assuming processing capacity in the amount of 1,060 tons/day and conversion capacity of 1,010 tons/day. c. Private industry would be responsible for providing capital funds. d. Private industry would be responsible for providing capital funds or in cooperation with a public entity/ entities; also public entity/entities acting alone, depending on the decision finally-reached on the matter. IX-3 00393 of the following means of financing countywide administrative costs: • Disposal surcharge fee • Countywide ad valorem tax • Sales tax • Federal or state grants-in-aid • Any combination of the above On or before April 1, 1977, the Board of Supervisors, after review of the Solid waste Coordinating Body report, shall recommend a means of financing countywide administrative costs. The Board of Supervisors shall then submit their recommendation to the incorporated cities for approval. Capital Costs The Plan antic pates that all solid waste disposal facilities will be privately owned and operated. The responsibility for providing capital for the construction of these facilities has therefore been assigned to private industry, except for the energy recovery facility presently being researched by the CCCSD. This does not, however, preclude public entities from cooperating with private industry in financing any of the required facilities or to construct publicly owned facilities if, in the future, it is decided this kind of approach be used. IX-4 " 00394 a w X. COAiMIG NCY PROGRAM The Plan envisions the construction of a number of physical facilities. The crucial facility is the energy recovery facility presently being researched under the auspices'of the CCCSD. The Plan anticipates that the successful opera- tion of this facility will reduce the amount of municipal waste tonnage disposed to landfills in Contra Costa County by more than 25 percent by 1980. If the CCCSD energy recovery facility does not prove feasible, provisions would have to be made to dispose of the additional municipal wastes that would otherwise have been handled by the CCCSD facility. The Contingency Program consists of disposal of these muni- cipal wastes in existing landfills operated in the County. The discussion that follows clearly indicates that existing landfills have sufficient capacity to dispose of projected quantities of solid wastes through the year 2000. On pages 5-10 and 5-11, the Report projects that the cumulative ton- nages of solid wastes to be accommodated to the year 2000 in the landfill sites now operating in the County are: Tons Projections without import 18,600,000 Projected import 1,600,000 Total 20,200,000 The total cumulative tonnage of solid wastes projected to be accommodated in the landfill sites now operating in the County to the year 2000 is 20,200,000 tons. The Report further indicates on pages 4-40 to 4-42 that landfill sites presently operated in the County have the following ultimate capacities. X-1 0039 Millu K. X _ cy, millions West Contra Costa County Fill 14 Acme Fill 31.5 Pittsburg Dump Negligible GBF 2 Total 47.5 Assuming a conservative "in-place" density of solid wastes of about one-half ton per cubic yard, the volume of the 20,200,000 tons of refuse to be disposed of within the Countv would be around 40,400,000 cubic yards. In addition to the volume that would be occupied by the solid waste increment, volume has to be provided for special wastes and cover. material. Again, taking the conservative viewpoint and assuming that all treated sewage sludge will be landfilled, that all cover material would be imported, and that cover material occupies 5 percent of the volume of landfill sites, then the total volume required for solid wastes, sewage sludge, and cover material to the year 2000 is estimated to be 46,200,000 cubic yards. It is anticipated that the other special wastes besides treated sewage sludge will add an insignificant quantity to the present landfills. With an available capacity in the present sites of 47.5 million cubic yards and a conservatively estimated 46.2 million cubic yards of solid wastes generated, it is conclu- ded that this Contingency Program would be adequate in the event the CCCSD energy recovery facility does not prove feasible. It is noted that the Contingency Program would not meet the state goal of a 25 percent reduction in the average municipal waste tonnage disposed to landfills by 1980. Under X-2 00t 96 u this Contingency Program, the County Solid Waste Coordinating Body would continue to explore all new avenues of energy recovery, particularly in the area of combining solid wastes with sewage sludge. X-3 00397 .._,„..�.,, •.;Err ter'§,i:." l•��J�3'h _ S XI. DISASTER PROGRAM If a disaster, such as a nuclear attack, earthquake, fire, or flood occurs, the County's and cities' emergency plans will be invoked, in which case all solid waste collection and disposal within the County will be under the direction of the County administrator for unincorporated areas and the city managers for incorporated cities. If a localized emergency occurs, which requires contingency actions but not the invocation of the County's or cities' emergency plan, the responsible local government entity will be in charge. The Contra Costa County Office of Emergency Services can be contacted with regard to appro- priate people to reach in case of an emergency. XI-1 '` 00398 XII. IMPLEMENTATION The implementation schedule shown in Table XII-1 lists specific functions and tasks proposed to produce the antici- pated results specifically described in the Plan, including those relating to the Management and Administration Program and those relating to the Recommended Physical Facilities Plan. Among the more important functions and tasks are formation of the Management Agency for carrying out admin- istrative tasks, determination of a financing method for administrative costs, and the design and construction of physical facilities. Today's solid waste technology is progressing rapidly. This requires a flexible approach to allow changes in various programs to meet new conditions. It is proposed that the Plan will be reviewed at least every 3 years in order to keep up with local and technological changes. XII-1 00399 x.:':,:,: wt�^fiS:. `'....; cqq.Zw ?'F 'e•9`f .RtiRFlIYA7<'ifE, .., T 'u^�„,.:au.:. . :,.,..... T 2 R Table XII-1. IMLEMENTATION SCHEDULE �•: �,Ian, 3'r•rt tern j ••pori, i Vtr7. Function or task 3zztpowlble rtiti TICI 2277 19132-179 1580 19) :it-.10 2020 lblic7sakiay • Revise and updato plan 'Cities.coczdi atisg body, 3card of saaesvisors • Coordinate countywide Cecnty Public e.forts for programs ticks Depacta.ut • .ali-y an collection Cities. sanitary I and franchising districts. board o. supervisors • negclation of Board of supervisors. disposal sites cities, state agencies ( t Public information I • Provlde information County 1lc61te Marks on Flan Des.artoeat ( I a Prepare and distribute county Public works brochure Department • Provide -pecilic cities. sanitary ` info.=atiea districts, county. private industsy Budgeting • Detar_ine financing Board of supezvlsors. rood for couttyu'ao ew.-dlmt:ag.`.o,Iy, administrative costs cities • Prepare fiscal year Cities, sanitary bu:;ets districts. runty I I • Analyze finaeciag Cities, =44ita_-7 rying discricuc, county I I Planning r s Disposal sites Cities, o07:.ty • Special programs Cities. saaiacy I 1 districts. county. ;private industry, crarca .:..� ittw7 tody. technical advisory cc=ittee } • C.mtiagency program ward of supervisors, I I cities, stxial eistricts, coordinatia.1 bn.4.7. techniea: advisory eeaittoe • Assess feasibility of Board of supervisors, participation is cities, special Programs such as Bay- districts, public and Delta Resource :rivate interests Recovery Project Adoption and enforcrxat of ordinances and stmdazds • Datecaine ordinance board of sup-visors. tc=plian-a with coordinating body. state standards tic:meal Advisory eo:ziittee • Revise existing Citi✓•, special crdinatcccs and districts. board of standards salxcvisors, coorliaatiog body, technical advise--y 1 cc=ittee • adopt new ordirInce Cities, special districts. Ward of supervisors, WWrdi:ating I bxt.ty, trchnical advisory eOsmitzee • Lforuemeat of lceal. Lcrvt hdalth entities, crJi.'ssxas ani stata citi:s, boir3 of I sots'- s.:?rrvi^..+rs. r.,ordi.utiaj � c•:ZMit?'ra • Regulato Group 1 and :tato .^.:d'art ent O! ltaar•'ous wastes sC••I.a. Seale ZvIi't wast.- Aeva jc.a:nt DcarJ I t = tl XII-2 00400 ;9 :`Jx i • ..et..:...'r"n:n...,.fti s........... f .r.. ...m .... _.. _. .,. ......_. .,.�.... ..,..M i�..w ..........�... r.....::Nti '�. Table XII-1. (Concluded) 3kidium rang short term term, Loco, 1901- 1991- Functians or task sesponaible entity L576 1977 1970 1979 19aO 1990 2000 tlanagwent and operation of system I • Collection Private industry I • Disposal sites program Private industry • Energy reeavc.—j program C=D (short range), private industry and/or public entities (long range) • Croup 1 and hazardous Private industry wastes program ( I 1 I • Litter control p-ogran Sheriff's departocat. ` cities • saw methods of Private industry collection or others I • Recycling testers Cities, special program districts or the county, civic groups. I private industry • Pursuit of San East Say Nuaicipal Francisco say area atclity District. CCSD. Baste Solids Study City ant County of San Francisco. San Jose. Day area SL •age aecvie•s agency • Revie•+plans and State solid rata pro-ir :s for :tan. :lanageneat eoaru.C.i•es, I conformance special districts. t:aard of sur--visors. coordinating body. technical m:visory committee • Operating and service Cities, special ——— —— • standards districts, and the board of supur+isors i • Pittsburg damp closure Private industry. City of Pittsturg, board of supervisors s Review management 9oard of supervisors agency structure Facilities planning I • CCCSD plant CCCSD • Other facilities Private industry Facilities construction I • acme processing CCCSn and private industry • CCCSD ene-rgy plant industry • hest County processing Private industry • Pittsburg transfer Private industry — • Byron transfer Private irdustcy • Pittsburg pro-messing Private industry • County energy plant Private industry • Improvements to the Prrvate industry 7 7 T Lase Cc:.ty landfill a San Ramon transfer Private industry Not•: Solid .lues iadicata inataal Pcoyramm: dashCd lc.ws indicate edeont mad third stage facility expansion. XII-3 00401 APPENDIX A _. STATE POLICY FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT As Adopted December 20, 1975 by THE STA'T'E SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00402 I II. PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES The State Solid Waste Management Board hereby finds and declares that the management .of solid wastes in'a manner which will protect.the public health, safety, and well-being, protect the environment and preserve our natural resources by the encouragement of source reduction of wastes and providing for the maximum reutilization and conversion to other uses of the resources con- tained therein, requires implementation of solid waste management programs which will conform to the following principles: A. SOLID WASTE likNAGE EENT PROGP.A!•r SHALL BE PLANNED TO PROVIDE: POR ADEQUATE, SANITARY, SAFE AND ENVIPDNIr.- -TALLY SOUIID SOLID WASTE STORAGE, COLLECTION, PROOZSING, •DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO MEET THE RESIDENTIAL, INSTITUTIONAL, CO.L%ERCLIL, IIIDU$TRIAL, AND AGRICULTUELAL NEEDS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORIIIA. OBJECTIVES 1. To assure that counties, in cooperation with cities and appropriate special districts. plan adequate solid waste storage, collection, processing, disposal facilities and services. 2. To assure that local governments prepare a plan which minimizes health and safety hazards, protects the environment and enhances the preserva- tion of natural resources by conforming with state guidelines for local solid waste management planning and the minimum state standards contained herein. 3. To require that solid waste management plans are implemented according to the schedule outlined in the plan and that plans are periodically reviewed and revised as necessary. 4. To provide a program of public information to encourage citizen participation in development of solid waste management programs and plans and to help ensure citizen understanding of solid waste manage- ment problems and solutions. 5. Tb assure that solid waste management problems are approached on a sufficiently large geographic basis, where necessary, to provide higher levels of economy and efficiency. A-1 00403 p . f jt I �I M,.,: ,,,.., ..r ,..,:y� ;,;:. ..,...t •5........ .:,. :a�.., . .:a.•. +• � ,. ='�+4. :ate. d'7_.. .�:-?^.".,., `t•�;.,mrt�.. ,. try�C?+ .... . J 6. To assure that necessary Class I sites are provided on a reqional basis to handle the increased volume of Group 1 wastes resulting from the enactment of increasingly stringent air and water quality control standards. 7. 4b assure adequate evaluation of alternatives for solution of agri- cultural solid waste management problems and the opportunities for recovery of energy and improved utilization of agricultural residues. B. SOLID WASTE PPAGPAF.S SHALL BE IMPLEPIENTED SO AS TO BE Cori- SISTENT WITIh APP?_)VED LOCAL SOLID WASTE t• :1AGEt"r4NT PLAITS AND TO BE I14 COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MINIMUM STATE STANDARDS. OBJECTIVES 1. To assure that all proposed new solid waste facilities and services are consistent with the county solid waste management plans and are in conformance with applicable air and water quality control regula- tions and with standards established by the State Solid Waste Manage- ment Board. 2. 7b provide that, where the private sector is utilized for solid waste runagement services, the permitting of such services will be based on the assurance of the financial capability and management experience of the private firms to adequately and safely provide these services. 3. To assure that solid wa3te handling and disposal services are pro- vided efficiently, safely, and in an economic manner consistent with the objectives and minimum state standards contained herein. 4. 4b encourage adherence to practical safety standards for protection of all operational personnel in solid waste collection, processing, disposal and resource recovery programs. S. To encourage 'the utili:a tion of such improved or new available tech- nology as will achieve optimum effectiveness and efficiency consis- tent with sound use of financial resources. 6, To provide, through Board staff services, technical assistance to government and private indisstry in disseminating the latest available solid waste management technology and practices which facilitate conformance with all state solid waste management policy, standards and programs. 7. Tb encourage or protide a coordinated manpower training program to assure that local managers and operators, both public and private, have trained solid waste management personnel available to meet current and projected manpower needs. A-2 00404 r 1 ,s is I 8. 7b encourage land use zoning which will protect solid waste management facilities and disposal sites from encroachment by noncompatible land uses. 9. 7b encourage revocation of ordinances that prevent importation of waste and limit the effective use of available regional solid waste management disposal, recovery or processing facilities. C. REDUCTION OF WASTE GENERATION SHALL EE PROMMM TO ENHANCE THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND LAND RESOURCES. OBJECTIVES 1. Tb encourage private industry, state and local entities, and the public to implement source reduction practices in order to reduce waste generation. 2. 710 encourage federal action toward practical and economic approaches to national policies which provide for a reduction in the generation of waste materials. 3. 7b work-with industry toward the modification of product character- istics, where possible, so'as to reduce the quantity of materials used or to facilitate materials recovery. D. RECOVERY OF MTERIALS AM ENERGY FRO,-4 THE SOLID WASTE STREAPt SHALL BE ENCOURAGED FOR THE C0NSERVATION OF ENERGY, LAND, AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES. OBJECTIVES 1. TO assure that county solid waste management plans include a resource recovery element which factually documents the quantity of solid waste that a county determines it will recover from its waste stream. The plan must include the review of regional or interjurisdictional feasibility of resource recovery systems and in the case of rural counties give special attention to at least source separation of wastes for recovery, all towards the goal of reducing the statewide annual tons per capita of resid:ntial and" commercial wastes now disposed of in landfills by 25 percent between the years 1972 and 1980. 2. 7b encourage investment of private capital and capabilities to assist . local entities in the development of resource recovery systems utilizing aodern technology. 3. 7b identify resource recovery research and development efforts and to provide information relative to markets and technology. A-3 00405 4. To encourage the expanded use and procurement of products containing secondary materials that meet quality and safety standards. S. To encourage local governmental entities to plan for the provision of necessary volumes of waste to maintain economic feasibility of exist- ing or planned resource recovery systems that will meet all state and local standards and conditions. 6. To encourage the removal of discriminatory government policies toward the recovery, storage, transportation, and use of secondary materials. E. 711E IMPLEMENTATION OF ADEQUATE LITTER CONTROL PROGRAMS TOWARD THE CLEANUP AND REDUCTION OF LITTER IS VITAL TO THE ENVIRON2-ENTAL QUALITY OF CALIFORNIA AND TO THE F.EALTH, SAFETY, AND WELL-BEING OF THE PUBLIC. OBJECTIVES 1. To promote and enhance state and local litter control programs and develop public awareness and citizen support through assistance in public information and education toward a solution of the litter problem. 2. To assure that county solid waste management plans include a litter control program element providing for the adoption, implementation, and enforcement of necessary litter control laws and regulations. 3. To assist in securinq financial assistance for local litter cleanup control programs as contained in state approved county plans. A-4 00406 3 APPENDIX B BACKGROUND DATA AND REPORT FINDINGS" 00407 BACKGROUND DATA AND REPORT FINDINGS Inventory of Existing Conditions To accomplish this first step in the planning process, the critical parameters--those factors which most affect the solid waste system--must be identified. The factors that could affect either the volume or composition of the solid wastes must be isolated from other factors for closer inspec- tion. Then, the existing problems must be defined and reduced to those that can be solved at the local level or that demand immediate attention because they create health hazards or nuisance conditions. To examine the County in detail for these purposes, it was divided into 10 subregions that represented unique condi- tions in terms of either economic activity or urbanization. The individual waste collectors and disposal site operators were then contacted to determine the volume of wastes they are presently handling. Major Findings To determine waste generation quantities, population is the most critical parameter. From an existing (July 1975) popula- tion of 581,400 persons, a total of 569,990 tons of solid wastes will be generated in 1975. An additional 48,770 tons of wastes will be imported in 1975 for a total of more than 617,000 tons of paper, glass, metals, garbage, and other wastes to be disposed of in Contra Costa County landfills. On the average, every person in the county produces 5.4 pounds of solid wastes per day. The quantity ranges from a high of 6 pounds per person per day in the central (high growth) region B-1 00408 f1 to a low of 4 pounds per person per day in the West County (stable growth) area. Average homeowner and system costs are shown in Table B-1. Table B-1. AVERAGE HOMEOWNER AND SYSTEM COSTS Average :{oxow-:er Costs, 5/month 1-container 2-container Area service service High u s-inc: $4.70 $9.40 Lwd Drentuvod 3.25 4.25 Average CaLaty 3.75 5.05 Average Sprt a Costs. $/tom Area Collection Raul Disposal Total West $19.00 $3.45 $3.80 $26.25 Central 24.5C 5.95 3.00 33.45 Fast 20.30 G.40 4.35 31.05 Nmragc 22.30 5.30 3.35 30.95 Ordinary municipal wastes are accepted at four landfill sites in the county: West County Fill in Richmond; Acme Fill near Vine Hill; Pittsburg Dump near Pittsburg; and the GBF Dump near Antioch. The West Countv Fill is convenient for most west county residents but the ogler three lie at the northern edge of the county, and some wastes are hauled more than 20 miles for final disposal. The Pittsburg and GBF dumps are small and filling rapidly. Contra Costa Countv has three of the four liquid and hazardous haste (Class I) disposal sites in the northern California area. The fourth, located near Benicia, accepts about 20 percent of an estimated 103 million gallons of wastes disposed annually, and Contra Costa County accepts the remaining 80 percent. The existing conditions are shown in Figure B-1. Waste Comoosition. The composition of the solid waste stream determines, to a large extent, what kinds of processing techniques may be feasible. Centralized resource recovery, B-2 00409 law 2 / �- 27 r436. OP ac = .1o 1 IL � o r skij Q Q JJJ1_ C co ca V N 0. t6 i s cn- H Co •.ti v c� X mac' V �j •_ x LU i �-r r «• c CS r� yr< I /- Ko s 3 = W CZ .Va 9 3-3 OU410 _ I for example, requires a large percentage of metals in the wastes so that the value of the recovered materials can pay for the expensive processing equipment. The solid waste stream is extremely varied in composition according to the land use from which it is generated, the level of economic activity, and the season of the year--to name only a few factors. No sampling programs were undertaken in Contra Costa County. Estimates were made by comparing the results of extended sampling programs from areas having similar characteristics. The results are presented in Table B-2. Table B-2. COMPOSITION OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTES Percent by Weight of Wastes Delivered to Landfill Residential :test Central East Average conercial- (1) (2) (3) couatyyide industrial Paper Newspaper 10 — — 9 5 Corrugated 7 — — 6 35 Other 38 35 25 :rotal 33 :3 36 S5 Garbage S 11.s 5 S 5 Yard, garden Wastes 7 17.5 20 1s — Metals Ferrous — 9.0 4 7 4 Senferrous — — 1 — — Alnninu� — 0_8 — 0.9 0.8 Other 0.5 0.1 0.2 Total rd T.-3- -5 T— 3- Glass. ceramics 12 10.0 10 10 8 Plastics S 5.0 2 2 3 Rubber --a --b 1 1 1 Leather. textiles --a --b 1 2 3 Hood —a —b 1 1 4 Other nonclassified 6 7.7 7 6 6 Grand total 100 100 100 100 100 a. Included in total for other nonclassified. b. Included in total for Plastics. Sources: (1) =doe aeee:Sos in So'_:e :_s:+ ?"ceasing. Progress Report. 1973-1974. College of �gineering, Cniversity of California. Berkeley. (2) H.-own and Caldwell. C=s.tong Engineers. So:id:ca La Prepared for Central CnnL—a costa Sanitary District. August 1974. (3) Estinated b7 Metcalf i WAY. Sac. B-4 00411 APPENDIX C FORECAST OF FUTURE CONDITIONS Y . : c 00412 6� �a 3 FORECAST OF FUTURE CONDITIONS Population Projections Projections establish the time of occurrence of significant events and answer these important questions: When will our present landfills be exhausted and when will new ones have to be located? When do major facilities have to be founded, designed, and built? Because population is the critical parameter in establishing waste volume, the number of future Contra Costa County resi- dents was estimated. Using data from the County Planning Department, populations were projected for each of the study areas, then summed for the entire county. The resulting projection is shown in Figure C-1. The populations projected for the various planning periods were: 1975 581,400 1980 622,000 1990 703,000 2020 861,000 As can be seen on the projection curve in Figure C-1, the popu- lations projected for purposes of this study are lower than previous projections made by the state and reflect the results of a census taken by Contra Costa County in 1975. Waste Quantity Projections The future quantities of solid wastes can be reduced to a function_ of two variables: the population projection and the amount of wastes generated per person. Historically, the second factor has been increasing steadily at an average C-1 00413 a of about 1 percent per year. This would increase the generation factor from the 6 pounds per person per day at present to 9.4 pounds per person per day by 2020. However, there are indications that this annual rate may no longer be accurate and that it may begin to decrease. An annual decrease of 1 percent would result in an average generation, factor of 2.6 pounds per person per day by 2020. An analysis was performed to gage the effect of all assumptions. The result is shown on Figure C-2. Curve O3 was selected for projection purposes because it appears to be a reasonable com- promise between extreme assumptions. This curve indicates that there will be an increase from the present 1,700 tons of wastes handled every day to 1,865 tons on an average day in 1980; 2,215 tons in 1990; and 3,430 tons by 2020. Results By applying the waste projections to estimates of the remain- ing volume of the existing landfills, it is possible to determine when present capacities will be exhausted if present practices continue: Year West County Fill (Richmond) 2010 Acme Fill 2010 Pittsburg 1980 GBF (Antioch) 1980 C-2 r 00414 ljos 1 � ,•��. 3tau to see411 l E ulatil 1u .uiwua l . f Isso l,ai 1637 less tan t,ss loss 29:0 1010 sato it" FIGURE C-1 . HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED POPULATIONS u • 1 O.tsa ta-lsal►a►autto a vauTatat ►uttiilgas. 6ssia too ta:atattl Is 111 tug. O2 ust as 1 stimi ar.0 nMt"It luck" O0 List"Lsita La"ll lin►s►suil"a t.itaistat►taittiasas a.a Is Arial ' ILan satuitta Istausa• L O use.i 3 altlui.scut►utptaie ISGtaie O! Ouse at 1 alO It ar0as a.iie tatutlY al:aalat I J -01 j E to uta lua lass :::7 tato Aso tut FIGURE C-2. SOLID 'WASTE VOLUME PROJECTIONS C-3 A ; , 00415 APPENDIX D ABAG LETTER AblD CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RESPONSE . f 00416 r°' r Ij I G n V bs v�,mxtv'0 Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont Berkeley.California 94705 - (415)841-9730 February 17, 1976 LEE E Mr. Victor W. Sauer Public !corks Director Contra Costa Coun y soas6th Floor Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 ' l "'"' Dear Vic: V Thank you for submitting the draft Contra Costa County Solid Waste Manage- ment Plan, the Plan Report and Plan Review Check List for our review and comment. An outline of the staff comments which appear below was approved by ABAG's Regional Planning Committee on February 4, 1976. Contra Costa County is to be coinmended for an exceptionally thorough re- port; a plan that proposes to attain and exceed the State Solid Waste M.anageman- Board's goal of 215% reduction of wastes going to landfills by !9BO; strong policy and objectives statements in support of continuing intercounty cooperation in oncoing regional programs and encouragement to Federal, State and regional agencies to establish coordinated programs that eliminate overlapping at the local level; and innovative sections relating to proposed operating standards for recycling centers and sugges- tions for a local program of surveillance of Class I site operations. The following cotrnenfis propose some additions that would strengthen the plan docurant: I. In Table 4-3, on page 4-10, the discussion of AEAG's administrative responsibilities and authorizations is incomplete and should include: ADMINISTRATIVE RESnNSIBILITIES AU PZRIZATION • Provide a policy framework for Voluntary joint powers agree- regional planning. tent signed by 85 cities and 7 counties that are presently members. • Review and can=_zt for consistency U. S. Office of Vansger.._nt with rational p:annirg on: and. Hul;get Oirc=tar 4-95- a. Applications from local juris- dictions under 150 Federal assistance pragams, and b. Craft env i ronman t a I document's for all projects of regional significance. Reareser.:in;City ani County Gpvernmens in i e Sar.Francisco Say Area D-1 00417 tt � Victor W. Sauer -2- Febr ary i7, 1976 o Review and cc.mant on preliminary Solid Waste Management and and final county solid waste Resource Recovery Act of management plans for adequacy 1972. Section 66780. of intercounty coordination and consistency with appropriate regional ard.subregional solid waste management plans_ 2. In the consideration of regional systems, no mention is trade of the proposed Bay Delta Resource Recovery Demonstration Project. Presum- ably this is because unresolved technical and environmental problems do not make it a feasible alternative at this time. The Bay Delta Resource Recovery Board 'hopes that certain definitive tests to answer these questions will be included in the State Solid haste Management Board's study of Bay Area solid waste ranagersent problems that is being conducted with 5500,000 of funds originally appropri- ated by the Legislature for the Bay Delta Project. A study of pathogen and viral survival has been contracted for by the Solid i;aste Management Saard. The soil evaluation study, designed to establish the structural feasibility of using compost to stabilize levees remains to be funded. Even though a different use of the organic component of refuse is proposed for Contra Costa County, in view of the contribtlions and active participation by Contra Costa County, the City of Antioch and Central Contra Costa Sanitary District in the effort to initiate a pilot scale de.a*nstration of the Bay Delta concept, we believe it would be appropriate for the Centra Costa County Plan Report to discuss the Bay Delta Project as a possible alternative and to support the inclusion of the soil evaluation study in the State Board's program to determine the highest and best uses of the Bay Area's wastes. 3. On December 3, 1975, AB.4G's Regional Planning Cann.ittee received a report from the Civil Preparedness Technical Advisory Committee, which contained a number of recommendations for ABAG action_ The Regional Planning Co.•imit•Fee asked at that time that all future re- view corraents prepared for County Solid Waste Plans forward the following reco mandation for inclusion in the contingency planning section of the Plan: " Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction I.c. Include planning for the disposal of disaster-generated rubble and debris using emergency sites identified before the disaster. This p!annin_ should be done in cooperation t.�--Zser vas iun and -0 velop =nt `.'..i-..^.i ss i Irl, the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Bay Area solid waste ma:acerma•^•t crcan i za t i ons." lie suacest that you discuss this r eco menda t ien with Mr. W i i I H. Perrv, Director of Er.ercancy Services for Contra Costa County, who was vice c:airman of tie Civil Preparedness Technical Advisory Colson:see that developed the r' rano ^�n��ticn. :% D-2 00418 i Victor W. Sauer -3- February 17, 1976 Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Yvonne San Jule Principal Regional Planner Chief, Land Resources Division YSJ:bi D-3 00419 y �I i RESPONSE TO ABAG COI*IENTS OF FEBRUARY 17, 1976 The ABAG comments on the November 1975 Draft were taken under consideration in revising the Plan. The following changes are incorporated in the November 1976 Draft Solid Waste Management Plan and are numbered to correspond with the items now listed in the ABAG letter of February 17, 1976: 1. A discussion of ABAG's administrative responsi- bilities and authorizations is now incorporated in Appendi-x. G of the Pian. 2. The feasibility of participation in programs such as the Bay Delta Resource Recovery Program is a task which is now specifically assigned; see page VIII-10 of the Plan. 3. A Disaster Program is now included in Chapter XI of the Plan. Planning for the Disaster Program is now set out as a Special Program in which Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruc- tion will also be considered. See Task 2 under Planning in Chapter VIII. D-4 00420 APPENDIX E DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE OF PRESENT OPERATING PROCEDURES AT EXISTING DISPOSAL SITES WITH THE STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS (To be performed as part of Task D-Z. by July 1978--See pages VII— S and VIII— 9) 00421 APPENDIX F DETERMINATION OF COMPLIANCE OF PRESENT SOLID WASTE ORDINANCES WITH THE STATE MINIMUM STANDARDS (To be performed as Task E-1. by .;uly 4, 1977--See pages IIII-10 and VII-ll) Od422 00422 APPENDIX G ERRATA: REVISIONS TO THE CONTRn. COSTA COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT REPORT OF DECEMBER 1975 ' . r 00423 GROUP 1 AND HAZARDOUS WASTES The last sentence under "Sources, Quantites and Composition," on page 10-9, is replaced by the following: The self-monitoring reports do not deal with onsite treatment and disposal of Hazardous/Group 1 Wastes. The manifest does require identification of the method of treatment or disposal. SPECIAL WASTES The section on "SEPTIC TANK PUMPINGS" (pages 11-48 to 11-50) has been revised to read as follows: Present Collection and Disposal System Thirteen septic tank pumpers serve Contra Costa County. They must be licensed by the County Health Department pursuant to Section 25000 through 25010 of the Health and Safety Code. The permit also provides for inspection of vehicles. Each company pumps individual tanks on a contract basis with individual homeowners. Current quantities average approximately 160,000 gallons per month, as shown in Table G-2. Sierra Reclamation and Disposal, Inc., is the largest single hauler. On the basis of the County Health Department records, there does not appear to be much seasonal variation. Most pumpers use the CCCSD treat- ment plant as a disposal point. One uses either the West Contra Costa Landfill or the Nine Par site in Santa Clara County; three others use the Brentwood Sewage Treatment Plant. Disposal of septic tank pumpings on the ranches in the east county area are no longer allowed. G-1 � . 00424 -.Hi-':•''_ H�" -.ti. ...-. ,. t lei e.. The CCCSD plant has facilities for receiving pumpings. In some areas of the county, manholes may be used with permission of the appropriate sanitary district. RWQCB discharge requirements at all existing landfills in the county (except for Sierra Reclamation and Disposal in Martinez) specifically exclude disposal of liquid wastes with Group 2 wastes. Table G-2. CURRENT QUANTITY AND DISPOSAL OF SEPTIC TANK PUM.PINGS - FIRMS SERVING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Quantity, 1,000 gal./yr Company and office location 11:73 1974 1975a Disposal site used A-1. Martinez 60.6 83.5 100.4 :tine Par (aiviso) and Blest Contra Costa landfill Baptista septic Sank. 65.0 133.2 214.4 Central Contra Costa Cor.-ord sanitary District Bob's Service, 307.2 363.6 288.0 Brentwood sewage Antioch treatment plant Eraie's Flibisq. 57.9 63.5 70.4 Central Contra Costa :sa_-uses Sanitary District Diablo Sanitary b 12.0 12.0 12.0 :1A Service, Concord Consolidated Sanitary 45.0 45.0 45.0 SA Service, tallejob GtC, Acampob 66.4 66.4 66_4 Brentwood sewage treatment plant Sewer DeRootisg, 12.0 12.0 12.0 NA Conm--db Sullivans. Concord 23.6 23.6 23.6 NA Williams Sanitary L'7.9 200.3 220.7 Brentwood sewage Service. Brentwood treatment plant. Sierra Reclamation 6C0.0 1.222.4 799.0 Central Contra Costa i Disposal, Harizez Sanitary District (previously Isduszrial Sank) Roto-Rooter, Ualaut 84.2 66.4 35.6 Central Contra Costa Creek ._ Sanitary District :btal 1.491.9 2.279.0 1,874.3 Average monthly 124.3 169.9 156.2 AA . not available. A. Based on extrapolation of 3-mentis data (Sanua.-y-March). b. Data riss/ng .or several or all maths. Figures shown are averages based on number of truckloads. Source: County Health t partment files. G-2 00425 It is possible that there is some illicit dumping of septic tank pumpings in the County. This may occur at several man- holes in remote areas of the County to avoid fees at the treatment plants. Because of the small quantities involved (one truckload is usually less than 1,000 gallons) this practice seldom poses serious problems. Trends According to the U.S. Census, housing units in Contra Costa County using septic tanks decreased from approximately 15,800--or 18 percent of total housing units--in 1960, to 12,500--7 percent of the total--in 1970. Future quantities of pumpings will probably decrease in proportion to the decrease in the number of homes using septic tanks. However, there will always be a need for pumping service in remote, sparsely populated areas of the county. For planning pur- poses, any new dwelling units built in the future are assumed to be sewered. Furthermore, it is assumed that the current number of homes using septic tanks--about 12,000-- will decrease to a minimum of 10,000 by 1990 and stay constant thereafter. The current monthly total of 160,000 gallons will decrease to approximately 150,000 gallons by 1980 and to 130,000 gallons by 1990 and subsequent years. Conclusions and Recommendations Septic tank pumpings are liquid wastes--somewhat comparable to a primary sewage treatment plant sludge. Accordingly, provisions for their disposal at sewage treatment plants should be continued. Septic tank pumpings should not be allowed at land disposal sites (i.e., sanitary landfills) . Pumpers should be encouraged to continue to discharge at sewage treatment plants rather than on land whenever practical. G-3 M94 rtx Table 4-3 of the Report is revised as follows: TABLE 4-3. REGION!.SOLID MSM lULV1COM AGENCIES A eacr Administatise Reseonsibility Autho-nation Association of Provide a policy framework for Voluntary joint powers Bay Area regional planning. agreement signed by 87 Governments cities am 7 counties that are presently members. Review and comment for consistency U.S.office of management with regional planning on: and Budget Circular A-95. a. Applications from local juris- dictims under 150 Federal assistance programs. and b. Draft environmental documents for all projects of regional significance. Review and cement on preliminary Solid Waste management and and final county solid taste=a--ate- Resource Recovery Act of rest plans for adequacy of inter- 1972. Section 66780. county coordimatica and consistency with appropriate regional and sub- regional solid waste=anagenent plans. Bay Area Air Regulate and abate emission of air California Health sad Pollution Control contamits ss from stationary Safety Code Section Na. District and Board sources but including rail and sea 23198-25399 MVCD) transport that cause injury. detriment. nuisance. or smoyance to any considerable==her of persons or which cause injury or drage to business or property. Regulate open burning of agricul- tural and forest wastes by permit system. say Conservation Rc;ulate all filling and dredging McAteer-Petris Act of and Development in Sas Francisco Bay. Limited 1%S Concision (BCDC) jurisdiction over substantial derelo�n..emts within a 100-ic. strip inland ftrn the bay to ensure=ai- r=public access to the bar and to reserve suitable shoreline property for ports and water-related industry and recreation. Limited jurisdiction over any proposed filling of salt ponds or managed wetlands to alive public access to the bay and retain the eaai==amount of water surface. Regional Water Define reasonable and beneficial use Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control of the waters of the state. and Quality Act Boards: (RXQC5) regulate waste discharge to protect water quality and those beneficial a. San Francisco uses. Adopt rare stringent stood- Bay arts than the State Soard where b. Central.Valley local teoloZical or hydrological conditions justify additional safe- -a.-ds for the protection of the quality of=romd or surface waters. -4 0042u1 -ca -_�:S"•+-.ta'n .. ,. �tis'ta w..:.r-..Fam*-::� . :.. .. ... .._ _.___.__._..-.�-.._ ...__-' r4�y� ,-. __.. �.i I+. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Membership in the November 30, 1976 CAL-NEVA Association. ) This being the time for Mr. Larry Elizarde, member of the Economic Opportunity Council and Executive Board member of the Central Labor Council of Contra Costa County (AFL-CIO), to speak with respect to membership of the Office of Economic Opportunity in the CAL-NEVA Association; and Mr. Elizarde having advised that the Central Labor Council opposes the recommendation of the Economic Opportunity Council that said Office become a member of the CAL-NEVA Association for the reason that such membership imposes obliga- tions for the Council's Chairman and the Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity to attend meetings and conferences which necessitate expenditures for transportation, lodging, and registration fees, monies that could be applied to programs for the poor and unemployed; and Mir. Nick Rodriquez, Chairman, Economic Opportunity Council, having advised that membership in the aforesaid organi- zation had been approved by the Council, and that provision for membership in an organization such as CAL-NEVA was included in the 1976-1977 budget; and Mr. Rodriquez having commented that the Association does have a director whose duties include disseminating informa- tion to the membership with respect to legislation, programs for the poor and unemployed, and the funding for same; and Mrs. Judy Miller, Director, Office of Economic Opportunity, having requested the Board to support the Council's recommendation for joining the CAL-NEVA Association, and having stated that an evaluation by the Economic Opportunity Council could be made at the end of the first year to determine if membership in said organization is advantageous to the County; and On the recommendation of Supervisor IT. N. Boggess, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDEED that this matter is REFERRED to the County Administrator for review and report. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed cc: Central Labor Council this 30th day of November, 1976. Office of Economic J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Opportunity County Administrator Economic Opportunity �.,�:.�G. `.G'L�tt-fie% Council By , Helen C. Marshall Deputy Clerk 00428 I1 THE BOARD OF SUPF.RjIiSC.RS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the matter of Decision on ) Appeal of lir. George Ruckstuhl, Jr. ) November 30, 1976 from Action of the Board of Appeals ) on Application No. 1043-76, Antioch Area: ) The Board on November 23, 1976 having closed the public hearing on the appeal of ;ti;r. G. Ruckstuhl, Jr., from Board of Appeals conditional approval of the application of Oak View Memorial Park Cemetery for a variance permit (I;o. 1C43-76), which would allow for a 4—foot sideyard for a mausoleum complex, and having fixed this day for decision thereon; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having advised that the issue the Board must decide is whether to allow the 20—foot set back to prevail (as set forth in County Ordinance Code) without any encumbent conditions or grant a 4—foot variance with conditions providing for landscape screening parallel to the south wall of the proposed mausoleum and along the south property line for a distance of 450 feet; and Supervisor Linscheid having expressed the opinion that the mausoleum is discernible with either a 4—foot or a 20—foot buffer zone, but, the landscape screening imposed as a condition of granting the land use permit would minimize this effect; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended, therefore, that the appeal be denied, and that the conditions of approval imposed by the Board of Appeals be amended to include landscape screening along the entire south side of the cemetery, approximately 1,000 feet; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of Supervisor Linscheid are APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Board adopt as its orm the Findings set forth in the Board of Appeals Resolution adopted September 14, 1976 with the aforesaid amendment incorporated therein. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors :'i. R. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSEIi: Supervisor A. Dias. ABSTAIN:: Supervisor J. E. Voriarty. Supervisor J. E. ioriarty abstained for the reason that he was not present at the hearing and therefor not familiar with the facts of the appeal. cc: Oak View : emorial Park Cemetery CERTIFIED COPT' i:r. G. Ruckstuhl 1 ceriifr that thi: L a fills. tri:" k .'orrect COPY Of Director of Planning t`tP Ori�:n^t <lo-r .^::! :'•+'is fe r,� a:4 in my office. and t`er i+ •_ • :,a. hr cti. Itcard of SGI••'!ci 7r.< n: r: ,'r, t••':!Orrin, on !h .la:• A-1- a �r [.~. * :A\. County CietL'&rso::i. .w Cf�: of—1'd Iaard u:Supervisors. Dr!-puts Cler' �.. �, •r' �• ( on Nov; 1 0 1976 n Rnnd3 Ar...i^hl 00429 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Canvass of Votes Cast in November 2, 1976 Election. Mr. J. R. Olsson, County Clerk-Recorder, having certified and placed on file with the Clerk of the Board the canvass of votes cast in the November 2, 1976 General Election with respect to the following local measures, which measures failed to pass: The Town of the San Ramon Valley Area Incorporation; Moraga School District Revenue Limit Increase; County Service Area R-9 Maximum Tax Rate; The County Jail Initiative; and City-County Thoroughfare System. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid Canvass of Votes is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: County Clerk-Recorder Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Elections Dept. Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 30t}yoy of November , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �9 i-���.' �T.i _ Deputy Clerk fSopoie errez }, s H-24 3/7615m 00430 ra In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 10 . 19 In the Matter of Supplement Number 006 to Amended License Agreement with IBM IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Supplement Number 006 to Amended License Agreement with International Business Machines, Inc. to enable Data Processing to compile programs to function under the OS Operating System (Program 5734/CB2) , at a cost of $201 per month beginning December 22, 1976. Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Data Processing Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Auditor-Controller ofi'uced this 30tlday of november _ 1976 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ?/t-f-e• (-mss r1�J , Deputy Clerk i H-24 3r6 iSm 00431 y 'iar.e r r ry :. d International Business Machines Corporation .• _ Armonk,New York 10504 Supplement to License Agrecincia for IR31 Irrograin Products From: International 13115ine s Nlacliins Corporation Referenre riven-e.iprr rn nt No.: 002131 2901 PERALTA OAKS COURT Branch Office Address: OAKLAND CALIFOINIA 94605 Supplement No.: 006 Brandt Office No.: 465 Name and Address of Customer: Customer No.: 2159000 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FU ICE BUILDING MARTINEIZ CALIFORNIA 94553 International Business Machines Corporation (tu>t) is pleased to confirm your order for licenses for the IB.1I Program Products and/or related optional materials listed below.HIM 1tcielly grant.the Customer nontransferable.,nonexclusive licenses to use each of these licenser)programs and/or related optional tttatcriak in machine readable form on tslw-/seriA nund red CPUs and/or to utilize program documentation as specified tw•low under the ternts of thr above refeuttced License!Agreetnrnt for lllJl 1'rogrant Products between inm and the Customer,which is heteby supplemented to include the following: Program Product List Programming Dt ignatrd CM In.tallatinn -rrginp F+timated 5rrricr r%ps•/Serial D—imitated CPU [rcrnsr 1'rrioJ Shipment t yrarpra rS[nmhlY❑pIM� Pru;raur \latetial f a.itiration Number location A1.1dir. r)t-nthst Date OtAerwireSuta4 S734/CB2-OS COBOL A 2040-11298 Martinez no 1 11/12/76 201.00 r Under the License Agreement for IBNI Program Products,the Customer has agreed that until that Agreement is specifically ter- minated by the Customer upon one month's prior written notice to to>t,the terms of that Agreement as amended will take precedence over the terms of any present or future order from the Customer for licenses. The Customer has further agreed that his acceptance of future delivery of any licenser)program and/or related optional materials in machine rear ble form and/or program documentation is conclusive evidence of his a,reement that the licetee for such licensed program, relat t optional materials or program docu- mentation is governed by the trrtns of that Agreement as amendell. International irsiness jdachin s-Como anion The Prr!;rfurt Produce Li.st rimy he emainued fon the Continuation Shert. ��. -------'---'-----—�� Cori COSTA COUNTY ' r ---------------------r,�(riwoiPrim)--------------------- By: 4J. P. Kenny -� P�_�.1 IJ 11-411/,j ��. CW rman, Board of S pery sors ------------ ------------------------- 0 Jru` �� ---- ATTEST: J. R. OL SOfl, LERK On------------------------ -------- --- -------- L ate By � i�:-�c.� MA` t Uty t'lrase send v i n,mmunirations to tnu at its branch of ice address fisted zbore anrr7nntii£rd tn?rnrtren. M.-croEiin_J'' %—Jfit board order -9 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Mager of Supplement Number 005 to Amended License Agreement with IBM IT IS BY TETE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Supplement Number 005 to Amended License Agreement for IBM Program Products with International Business Machines, Inc., to enable Data Processing to perform certain functions on the newly installed disk drives (Program 5743/SM1) , at a cost of $43 per month beginning December 1, 1976. Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Data Processing Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this =. * day of November . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk !t Crate H.24 3/7615m 00433 International Business Machines Corpocatioax Armom,. Supplement to license Aoreenient for 113,11 1'rograin Products ! From: International Business .Machines Corporation Reference Laccase Abreement Na.: CO2131 Branch Office address: Supplement No.: 005 290L PERALTA OAKS COURT OAKLAIID CALIFOFINIA 94605 Branch Office No.: 465 None and Address of Cus Caner: Customer No.: 2159000 COXI'RA COSTA COLLWY FIXXtCE BUILDING MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 International Business Machine-, Carl-oration (taxi) is pleased to confirm your order for licenses for the IBiN Program Products andfor related optional materials listed below.IBI hen-by rranLs the Customer nontransferable,nonexclusive licenses to use each of these licensed programs and/or related optional materials in machine readable form on type:/serial numbered CPUs and/or to utilize program documentation as specified Ir low under the terms of the above tefrrenced License Agreement for IBJI Program Products between stat and the Customer,which is hereby supplemented to include the following: Program Product List 1'mgramming Ve ignatcd CPU In.tallation Testing Estimated Charges denier Type/Serial Desi�aatnl CI'[7 License 1'rrind Shipment 01—thty Unl".. Program/Material laa.vfication Number Location Applin. e]tunthet Date other.•beststedr 5743/Sa11 DOS A 2040-11298 Uartinez no 1 10/15/76] 43.00 So2T�m Eft F tr- Under the License Agreement for IB\I Program Products,the Customer has agreed that until that Agreement is specifically ter- minated by the Customer upon one month's prior written notice to tau,the terms of that Agreement as amended will tale pn•cedence over the terms of any present or future order from the Customer for licenses. The Customer has further agreed that his acceptance of future delivery of any licensed program and/or related optional materials in machine readable form and/or program documentation is conclusive evidence of his agreement that the license for such licensed program. related optional materials or program docu- mentation is governed by the terms of that Agreement as amended. InternationaFuusi�qjWMa Cporation Thr Program Product l i3t Wray be continued on the Contiratition Sheet. Bs______� _v-- tug_____-,�___ __ C01 RA COSTA COUNTY 00434 ------------R_11_ BLIESE------- ------- -- ------------- g J. P. Kenny Na—ITrr+'..r Privetl � IIRANGI 1lA:L1GER rman, Boar o upervisors rit1e ATTEST. J. R. LSS N CLERK , On---------OG7 t- .-A976 7 ------- =e B DEPUTY send af:conranic.:rions to tau at its branch enter address ti..t,-J.Itn.r' te.s noti fi:d :hnlrarr. Microhlme-J v.flit board o;Iter s r (. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Project Agreement Number 38 and 39 For the Second Year Community Development Program.(1976-77) The Board having this day considered the recommendation of the Director of Planning and the Community Development Advisory Council that it approve Community Development Block Grant Program Project Agreement Number 38 and 39 between the County and the City of Martinez for $95,000 in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the period of November 3, 1976 to June 30, 1977. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute said Agreement. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Planning Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: City of Martinez affixed this 30thdoy of rdovember . 19 76 c%Planning Department County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OW N, Clerk By Deputy Clerk ow.y 00435 H-24 3/76 15m PROJECT AGREEMENT COWINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 1. Agreement Identification. Dumber 38 6 39 Department: County Planning Department Subject: Allocation of Federal funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: City of Martinez Address: 525 Henrietta Street Martinez, CA 94553 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is November 3. 1976 and it terminates June 30. 1977 unless sooner terminated as provided herein, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 4. Allocation Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed $ 95,000 5. County's Obligations. County shall make those allocation payments to the contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances con- tained or incorporated herein. 6. General Conditions and Assurances. This Agreement is subject to the "General Conditions" and the "Assurances" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work as described in and in accordance with the "Project Work Program" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms, conditions and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Agreement implements in whole or in part the following described project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: That Project as described in the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program Application dated April 6, 1976 and approved by- HUD on June 25, 1976; and as more particularly described in the "Project Work Program", attached hereto. 9. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: J%. i COUNTY OF CONMk COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR ', Byt� J. P K `Bye `.xl�L"�llly Ch , Board of Supe sors John Sparacino, Mayor ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON,. Co Clerk City of Martinez i DeputyY G;,9 Note to Contractor: (1) If a public agency, designate official capacity in public agency and attach Recommende y ment a certified copy of the governing body resolution authorizing execution B of this agreement. (2) If a corporation, +—Arithon A. Dehaesus designate official capacity in business, execute acknowledgment form and affix Form Approved: County Counsel corporation seal. By�/� 9 Deputy 00435 DJF:dh Microfilmed wiih board ord# to PAYMENT PROVISIONS 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Agreement. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Agreement shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. All payments made under this Agreement shall be from Federal funds only. No general County funds shall be expended under this Agreement. If, for any reason whatsoever, County does not receive such Federal funds, Contractor agrees that County shall have no payment obligation hereunder. 2. Payment .amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement, County will pay Contractor an amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" contained in the Project Work Program. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which . are determined in accordance with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as published in the Federal Register, Volume 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended. All of the aforesaid documents are by this reference incorporated herein. Costs incurred in carrying out the project, whether charged to the project on a direct or an indirect basis, must be in conformance with the requirements of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments", except to the extent inconsistent with the aforesaid documents. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands for payment in accordance with the above. Said demands shalt be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 60 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified above. S. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor by County notifying Contractor in writing if (a) the Contractor has failed to perform its duties under this Agreement, or has insufficiently documented same, or (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demands for payment. 6. Payment Adjustments. (a) If any funds are expended by the Contractor in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, County may make necessary adjustments in payments to Contractor on account of such unauthorized or illegal expenditure. No such action taken by County shall entitle Contractor to reduce salaries, wages, or supportive services for any particpant or to expend less during the effective period of this Agreement than those sums called for in the Project Work Program. Any such reduction in expenditures may be deemed sufficient cause for termination. Contractor shall reimburse County for any allocated monies which are expended in violation of this Agreement or used for unauthorized or illegal expenditures. -1- 00437 I 7. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually be incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. The Contractor shall provide County with a Certification of its Cost Report required under this Contract. Said Certification shall provide a full, true, and accurate accounting of the actual cost of services under this Contract, including all applicable expenditures, revenues, and indirect cost allocations, and any other pertinent allocations which are in connection with Contractor's operations that are not a part of this Contract. 8. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement). Any certified cost repdrt or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Agreement. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjust- ments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. 9. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 8. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Agreement. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement. WF:dh -2- 00438 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable to public agencies with respect-to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, including Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter V. Part 570, as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. Documentation of such compliance shall be made available for review by the County upon request. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Agreement are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's .regular business records pertaining to this Agreement and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Agreement for three years from the date of submission of the Annual Performance Report by the County to HUD, except as follows: (a) Records that are the subject of audit findings shall be retained for three years after such findings have been resolved. (b) Records for nonexpendable property which was acquired with Federal grant funds shall be retained for three years after its final disposition. (c) Records for any displaced person shall be retained for three years after he has received final payment. 5. Termination. a. Failure to Perform. In the event the Contractor fails to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder and such failure of performance is not cured by the Contractor within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from the County, the County may in addition to any other remedies, complete the Contractor's obligations in any reasonable manner it chooses, take possession of any real or personal property associated with the project, and construct, operate or maintain the project as the County may deem necessary to fulfill requirements of the Federal Government. The Contractor agrees to reimburse the County for any costs or expenses incurred by the County because of said failure to perform and also agrees to convey title to any real property acquired by Contractor with project funds should County request such title. b. Cessation of Funding. In the event that Federal funding for this Agreement ceases, this Agreement is terminated. c. Failure by the Contractor to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the County thereunder. 6. Entire agreement. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein and in the "COOPERATION AGREBIENT, H.C.D.A. 1974" effective January 20, 1976 and amendments relating thereto, if any, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. -1- 00439 i 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Agreement, including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be modifications to this Agreement except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Agreement, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Agreements. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Project Work Program may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such adminis- trative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Project Work Program. C. Extension of Term for Performance. Without requiring Contractor to provide consideration in addition to that supporting this Agreement, the County of Contra Costa, through its Planning Director, may grant Contractor an extension of time for performance, beyond that time specified above under 'Term" (Paragraph 3). Any such extension must be in writing and shall be at the sole discretion of County, 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Agreement shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the Federal Gov:rnment. 10. Law Governing Agreement. This Agreement is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11• Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Agreement be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Agreement is subject to modification to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Agreement as prescribed; nor shall the Countv be thereby stooped from bringing any action for damages or enforce- ment arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions thereof. 15. Original Agreement. The original copy of this Agreement and of any modification thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Hoard of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Assignment. This Agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Agreement, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County, 1$. Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. -2- 00440 r P.� 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest and will establish safeguards pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the attached "Assurances". 17, • Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confidentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. lg. Indemnification. a. Contractor hereby waives all claims and recourse against the County including the right to contribution for loss or damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement except claims arising from the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents and employees. b. The Contractor shall defend and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees against and hold the same free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, costs, and/or expenses of liability due to, or arising out of, either in whole or in part, whether directly or in- directly, the organization, development, construction, operation, or maintenance of the Project except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents or employees. C. In the event County is named as co-defendant the Contractor shall notify the County of such fact and shall represent County in the legal action unless County undertakes to represent itself as co-defendant in such legal action in which event County shall bear its own litigation costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. d. This condition shall not terminate on the date specified in the Agreement but shall remain in full force and effect. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension of modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruc- tion of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurace coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written-notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurace as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so thar other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. -3- 00441 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to Contra Costa County Planning Department, P.O. Box 951, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Available Copies. Copies of the County's Project documents (as specified in Paragraph 8, Project, of this Agreement), and all pertinent Federal statues, regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars applicable to this Agreement, shall be available at all times for inspection by the Contractor during regular business hours at the Offices of the Planning Department, Martinez, California. 22. Retained Powers. All powers not explicitly vested in the Contractor remain in the County. 23. Project Development. a. If the Project includes construction, the construction plans and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Contractor before construction is commenced. b. The Contractor shall secure completion of the construction work in accordance with the approved construction plans and specifications. c. If the Project includes acquisition of real property, the purchase price for such real property- shall be determined from two County-approved appraisal reports prepared by competent appraisers or through proceedings in eminent domain. The initial acquisition offer shall be the highest County-approved appraisal. The appraisal reports and qualifications of such appraisers shall be submitted for review and approval by the County before initiation of the acquisition procedure. Contractor agrees to furnish County preliminary title reports respecting such real property or such other evidence of title which is determined to be sufficient by County . Contractor agrees in negotiated purchases to correct prior to or at the close of escrow any defects of title which in the opinion of County might interfere with the operation of the Project. In condemnation actions such title defects must be eliminated by the final judgment. DJF/dh -4- 00442 ASSURANCES The Contractor, as recipient of funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, assures and certifies that: 1. It will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of Federal Management Circulars 74-4 and 74-7, as they relate to the County's Community Development Block Grant Program application, accept- ance and use of Federal funds for this Federally-assisted project. 2. It possesses legal authority to execute the Project. 3. Contractor, identified as "Applicant" below, will comply with: a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.I. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part I), which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subiected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this assurance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial -- assistance extended to the applicant, this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance extended or for another purpose involving the pro- vision of similar services or benefits. b. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-284) as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community develop- ment in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; and will take action to affirmatively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services within the applicant's juris- diction. _ c. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR 570.601), which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole-or in part with Title I funds. d. Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunity in housing and nondiscrimin- ation in the sale or rental of housing built with Federal assistance. e. Executive Order 11246, and all regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part 130), which provides that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in all phases of employment during the performance of Federal or federally-assisted contracts. Such contractors and subcontractors shall take affirmative action to ensure fair treatment in employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruit- ment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. f. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and'contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. t4. Prior to the submission of the "Project Work Program", the following have been complied with: a. Citizens have been provided with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for the project, the rangL- of activities that may be undertaken, and other important project requirements; b. Citizens have been provided an adequate opportunity to participate in the development of the project and in the development of any revisions, changes, or amendments. -1- 00443 5. It will: a. Provide fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance in accordance with Sections 202, 203, and 204 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and applicable HUD regulations (24 CFR Part .42), to or for families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations displaced as a result of any acquisition of real property for an activity assisted under the program; b. Provide relocation assistance programs offering the services described in Section 205 of the Act to such displaced families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations in the manner provided under applicable HUD regulations; c. Assure that, within a reasonable time prior to displacement, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to such displaced families and individuals in accordance with Section 205(c)(3) of the Act, and that such housing will be available in the same range of choices to all such dis- placed persons regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income; d. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures provided for under HUD regulations; and e. Carry out the relocation process in such a manner as to provide such displaced persons with uniform and consistent services, including any services required to ensure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment to such displaced persons on account of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income. 6. It will: a. In acquiring real property in connection with the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, be guided to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the real property acquisition policies set out under Section 301 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) and the provisions of Section 302 thereof: b. Pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Section 503 and 304 of the Act; and c. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures under HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 42). 7. It will give HUD and the Comptroller General through any authorized representative access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. B. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political activity of employees. 9. It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296, relating to evaluation of flood hazards. 10. Its officer executing this Agreement: a. Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such act apply pursuant to this Part; and b. Is authorized and consents on behalf of the Contractor and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. *11. The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of- slum or blight. Miere all or part of the Community Development Program activities are designed to meet other Community Development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically described in the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. -2- 00444 12. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particuarly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. 13. _It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. 14. It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such require- ments. (*Assurances 4 and 11 are applicable only if Contractor is a city.) -3- 00445 • EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1976-1977 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development of a Community/Neighborhood Recreation and Commemorative Plaza on land deeded to the City of Martinez for these purposes by the City founders. Facility would primarily serve low and moderate income residents in immediate vicinity. Phase I development of Plaza Ignacio Martinez will serve to: 1. Provide small-site recreation facility to neighborhood residents. 2. Celebrate City's centennial with Nation's bicentennial. 3. Beautify neighborhood and community. B. PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE Time Schedule on a month-by-month basis for the above Project indicating when major activity items are expected to be undertaken and completed. Program Component Starting Date Completion Date Design of Plans and Specifications October 1, 1976 December 31, 1976 Construction Contract to Bid January 1, 1977 February 1, 1977 Phase I - Construction February 1S, 1977 April 30, 1977 C. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Contractor should indicate who will be responsible for administering the Work Program. Anna Aiello , Administrative Assistant City of Martinez 525 Henrietta Street Martine_, CA 94553 (415) 228-440, Ext. S3 - 1 - 00446 PROJECT WORK PROGRA14 D. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor should indicate, where applicable, what performance standards (details of project implementation) will be applied in implementing the Work Program. Work performed under this contract will meet the specifications of design plans previously developed in accordance with the Preliminary Master Plan for the Plaza Ignacio Martinez. Inspections will be made by the City Engineering Department. Tho land will remain in City ownership. All Federal regulations pertaining to construction con- tracts concerning Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action, and Competetive Bidding will be followed. A copy of all contracts let under this agree- ment will be forwarded to the County Planning Department prior to the processing of demands for payment. All necessary environmental docu- ments will be prepared by the City in conformance with state laws. E. PROGRAM MONITORING 1. Contractor's staff will meet at least once per quarter with appropriate County staff and Community Development Advisory Council representatives where applicable to discuss progress of the Contractor toward achieving stated work program objectives and to assist Contractor's staff in solving problems. 2. Contractor shall maintain and submit Quarterly Progress Reports to the County Planning Department. 3. Contractor shall maintain and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports on work performed by sub-contractors. F. GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition.' Contractor shall not allow staff overtime wage rates under this Contract. 2 0044-7 PROJECT 'WORK PROGRAM G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services-under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expendi- tures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $60,000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME -8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $60,000 2. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning Director or his designee. 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presecribed by County. - 3 - 00448 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 1976-1977 H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: �s City of Martinez PAGE OF 1 BUDGET PERIOD: jury 1. 1976 - June 30, 1977 Original x Amendment No. (b) (c) (d) BUDGET ITEM(a) CD FUNDS - $ + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - $ Phase I Design and Development $60,000 $60,000 ° Design of Plans and Specifications ° Bid Expenses ° Construction and Site Development e TOTAL $60,000 $ - $60,000 NOTES: (a) Detailed categories expanded from Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures pursuant to FMC 74-4 (b) Items that are eleigibile to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds (see'HUD Rules & Regulation). 1 (c) Estimate of other necessary expenditures that cannot be funded with CD monies; and indication of anticipated sources, assurances and timing of other funds. (d) Sum of (b) and (c) above including both Community Development and non-Community Development funds. - (e) Contract Payment Limit for CO project. 00449 . EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRA14 1976-1977 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Phased development of major waterfront park in Martinez, including beach and picnic areas, and hiking and bicycle trails. Activity will include creation of a simulated, imported sand beach on top of a former dredge spoils area, backed by mounding to provide wind protection for a family picnic and informal play area. Underground utilities will be brought to the site. Adjacent to the beach, it is intended to begin excavation of a former dredge spoils area leading toward its restoration as a marsh area. B. PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE Time Schedule on a month-by-month basis for the above Project indicating when major activity items are expected to be undertaken and completed. _ Work Item Starting Date Completion Date Construction and Site Development March 1, 1977 June 30, 1977 C. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Contractor should indicate who will be responsible for administering the Work Program. Anna Aiello Administrative Assistant City of Martinez - 52S Henrietta Street Martinez, CA 94553 (415) 228-4400, Ext. S3 - 1 - 00450 ti r r._ PROJECT WORK PROGRAM D. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor should indicate, where applicable, what performance standards (details of project implementation) will be applied in implementing the Work Program. The sand beach would provide East Contra Costa County with its only shoreline beach area a: a time when shoreline areas are possibly the most threatened of all San Francisco Bay Area resources. The marsh restoration project will supplement existing marsh areas, valuable for their opportunities for wildlife observation and education. The East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) will be responsible for the development (i.e., preparation of plans and specifications, bidding, contracting and contract administration) for the entire waterfront park area (including the sand beach/marsh restoration area). The City of Martinez has entered into a joint powers agreement with the EBRPD to imislement this activity. The Contractor will ensure that all necessary permits are obtained prior to initiating the work and that all Federal regulations pertaining to construction contracts are followed. The City will ensure that access to the handicapped will be provided in accordance with all State and Federal laws and regulations. A copy of all contracts let under this agreement will be forwarded to the County Planning Department prior to the processing of demands for payment. All necessary environmental documents will be prepared by the City in con- formance with state laws. E. PROGRAM MONITORING 1. Contractor's staff will meet at least once per quarter with appropriate County staff and Community Development Advisory Council representatives where applicable to discuss progress of the Contractor toward achieving stated work program objectives and to assist Contractor's staff in solving problems. 2. Contractor shall maintain and submit Quarterly Progress Reports to the County Planning Department. 3. Contractor shall maintain and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports on work performed by sub-contractors. F. GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition. ' Contractor shall not allow staff overtime wage rates under this Contract. _ 2 _ O0451 3 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expendi- tures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY A14OUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $35,000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT A14OUNT $35,000 2.. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning Director or his designee. 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presecribed by County. - 3 - 00452 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 1976-1977 H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: City of Martinez PAGE OF � BUDGET PERIOD: July 1, 1976 - dune 30, 1977 Original x Amendment No. (a) (b) (c) BUDGET ITEM CD FUNDS - $ + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - $(d) Public Works, Facilities Site Improvements $351000 $35,000 $70,000.00 (Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund) e TOTAL $ 35,000 $ '35,000 $70,000.00 NOTES: (a) Detailed categories expanded from Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures pursuant to FMC 74-4 (b) Items that are eleigibile to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds (see HUD Rules & Regulation). (c) Estimate of other necessary expenditures that cannot be funded with CD monies; and indication of anticipated sources, assurances and timing of other funds. (d) Sum of (b) and (c) above including both Community Development and non-Community Development funds. (e) Contract Payment Limit for CD project. - 00453 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Community Food and Nutrition Project. The Board having been apprised by the County Administrator of a communication from the Director, Community Services Administration, Washington, D.C., dated November 17, 1976, indicating it is not possible for the Community Services Administration to alter the decision of the Region IX Office not to re-fund the Contra Costa County Community Food and Nutrition Project and, consequently, subsequent funding of this program will involve all County money; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter of reconsideration for further funding of the subject program be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee for appropriate review and report to the Board on December 14, 1976. PASSED ON November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. - - 1Mdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 30ttday of November 1976 !f J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By lifts i iii , Deputy Clerk Orig: Human Resources Agency oary Cra County Welfare Director Ed Rimer, Food Coalition Contracts Unit 0 0454 County Administrator H-aa 3,,a 1so,Board Copn:Lttee County Auditor F . . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California NnvPmhAr Irl. 19 Z6_ In the Matter of _ Approval of Architectural Services Agreement for County Service Area R-7, Alamo. (W.0. No. 5486-927) The Board of Supervisors APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute the Architectural Services Agreement with Royston, Hanamoto, Beck E Abey, Landscape Architects, 225 Miller Avenue, Hill Valley, California, for development of Community Park No. 1 which is on a forty-three acre site adjacent to Monte Vista High School on Stone Valley Road in Alamo. Said agreement provides for a total fee of $30,000 for services rendered through the design process and to be paid in increments as the work is accomplished as specified in the Agreement. PASSED BY the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator• Public Works VAtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of (Buildings E Grounds) Supervisors axed this 30thday of November . 19 76 cc: Public Works Department affixed Agenda Clerk J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Building Projects �v-y County Auditor-Controller BDeputy Clerk June Dye J - Architects U__ •- �t"'�'' � H-23 3/76 Ism 0045-5 a — a I �_ lv AGREMME r FOP. "RUITECTUrUNL SERVICES Table of Contents Page ARTICLE.. I General Intent 1 ARTICLE II Description of Project 1' ARTICLE III Basic Services of Architect 2' A. General 2 B. Phase for Analysis and Programming of Site Utilitiza- tion plan. 3 C. Design Development Phase 3 D. Construction Documents Phase 3 E. Construction Phase 6 F. Time Periods 7 ARTICLE IV Extra Services by Architect 8 ARTICLE V Architect's Fee 9 ARTICLE VI Payments under this Agreement 10 ARTICLE VII Duties of the Architect 11 ARTICLE VIII Duties of the County 13 ARTICLE IX Cancellation of Agreement or Suspension of Project 15 ARTICLE X Termination of this Agreement 16 EXHIBIT "B" acrofitrne—A with board order 0045S N AGREEMENT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICZS Contra Costa County, Calif. This Agreement is_made on November,_, 1976 by. and between the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "County, and ROYSTON, HANAPIOTO, BECK & ABEY, Landscape Architects, a California Corporation, 225 Miller Avenue, Hill Valley, ' _ California, hereinafter called "Architect', and the County and the Architect, for the considerations named herein, mutually agree as follows: IRTICLE I GENERAL INTENT OF AGREEI•SENT The County, acting through its Board of Supervisors, hereinafter called the "Board", intends to develop a park (Community Park No. 1 - County Service Area R-7) on a forty- three acre site adjacent to Monte Vista High School on Stone Valley Road in Alamo, or to perform other related work as hereinafter more fully described. Professional architectural and/or engineering skills and services not available within the County organization are essential for the proper and satis- factory execution of this project. For that reason the pro- fessional Architect is hereby retained by the County. A clear understanding, at the outset, of the relationships and obliga- tions between the County and the Architect is of the utmost importance. This Agreement forms the basis of the professional relationship between the County and the Architect. .RTICLE II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT A. The project contemplated under this Agreement, and the general location thereof, are described as follows: -1- 00457 .,moi -•...�.. - __.. _ .v.__.- ._ F, r TIC%E II. DESCRIPTION OF -THE PROJECT (cont'd) Design and construct a park (Comeaunity Park No. 1, County Service Area R-7) on the forty-three (43) acre parcel ad- jacent to Monte Vista High School on Stone Valley Road, Alamo, Based on the proposed program and budget developed by County* staff (Exhibit B) . ARTICLE III. BASIC SERVICES OF ARCHITECT The Architect represents and shall render the services and furnish the items described as follows: A: General 1. The Architect holds current registration as a Landscape Architect in the State of California and furthermore does by entering into this Agreement certify that he is professionally competent and able to provide the pro- fessional services outlined herein by reason of his personal knowledge and skill and that of his staff of consultants retained and paid by him. 2. The Architect and his staff of consultants shall be fully knowledgeable of and shall execute all work in full com- pliance with all applicable codes, laws and regulations. 3. At all times throughout the various stages of the project the,Architect agrees to attend meetings and conferences as the County deems necessary or as requested by the County. Meetings included under this contract are listed under Article III C. S and D. 6. Additional meetings are covered under Article IV.A.8. -2- 00458 '. I I.E 111. BASIC SERVIUS OFARCHITECT f cont'd) 4. Architect shall perform such duties as may be necessary and which are usually performed by a professional landscape architect and which are necessary for the successful completion of the project, even though not specifically called for herein, B. Phase for Analysis and Programming of Site Utilization Plan This Phase has been completed by County staff. C. Design Development Phase This Phase shall be an outgrowth of detailed study of the consideration brought forth in the First• Phase. It will be presented to the Board for its approval and shall consist of the following: •1. Prepare Master Plan indicating park facilities, use areas, open-space, land forms, circulation, and general indication of planting, and also indicating two distinct phases of construction. 2. Prepare preliminary cost estimate. 3. Review Master Plan with the County Staff and Service Area Advisory Committee. ` 4. Establish priorities and scope of each of the two phases of development. 5. Attend a total of two (2) public meetings with Service Area Advisory Committee. D. Construction Documents Phase Construction Plans and Specifications shall be pre- pared outlining, for bidding and construction purposes, the scope and details of the architectural, mechanical,, ' electrical, structural, landscape architectural, and -3- 00459- i i ICLE III. BASIC SERVICES OF FRCHITECT (cont'd) general engineering work to be performed by the Contractor. The documents shall represent two construction phases. 2. When so directed by the County, the Architect shall include in the bid documents provisions to receive alternate bids and unit prices. 3. Prepare final cost estimate. 4. The Architect shall, as necessary, furnish or cause to be furnished to the County adequate description of electrical, mechanical and plumbing equipment to be installed denoting among other things the con- figuration, location, fastenings, as well as - methods for inspecting and servicing. S. Review construction documents with County staff and Service Area Advisory Committee. 6. Attend a total of one (1) public meeting with the Service Area Advisory Committee. 7. Documents and Drawings; • a. All contract documents shall be prepared by the • architect except General Conditions, Bid Forms, Instructions to Bidders, and other standard County items which will be provided by the County to the Architect for inclusion with the Specifications. b. The following documents will be furnished to the County at the Architect's expense: ' (1) Up to 8 copies of drawings and outline -4- 00460 r .RTICL8 III. BASIC SERVICES OF ARCHITECT (cont'd) specifications of the Design Development Phase for checking purposes, plus one rendered plan and one perspective sketch. Up to four (4) copies of Architect's preliminary cost estimate • (2) Up to eight (8) copies of the construction plans and specifications for final checking purposes. (3) Up to four (4) copies"of Architect's final cost estimate. (4) One set of reproducible plans for use as as-builts. c. Upon final approval of the above-mentioned construction plans and specifications, the Architect shall. turnish the County with complete sets of plans and specifications as required at County expense. The County reserves the right to request additional copies of any documents as may be required, and 'only the direct printing cost of which will be at additional County expense. The County reserves the right to request additional copies of any documents as may be required, and only the direct printing costs of which will be at additional County expense. 6. Bidding Procedre will be administered by the County with assistance from the Architect who will do the following; a. Prepare bid documents for distribution by the County. b. Prepare all addenda to the contract documents. c. Answer questions and provide clarifications directed to the contract documents. d. Assist the County in reviewing the submitted bids and advise the County concerning acceptance or rejection of bids. -S- 0()461 7* ?CLE ITI. BASIC SERVICES OF RCIJITECT (cont'd) E. Construction Phase 1. Construction administration will be provided by the County with the Architect assisting in the general administration of the construction contract. The Architect's duties shall include but not be limited to the following: a. To advise as. to the true intent of the con- tract documents and to notify the Contractors through the County, of such intent in writing with field orders, sketches, reports, or other memoranda. However, the Architect shall not. commit the County to extra expense or otherwise modify the construction contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. b. Check submittals and shop drawings. c. Make periodic review and observation of the work. d. Prepare drawings, as needed from time to time -during the work. � e. Provide technical direction as necessary. f. Furnish or cause to be furnished to the County such drawings, catalogs, or descriptions of mechanical and plumbing equipment to be in- stalled, with sufficient and adequate detail to allow the County to know in advance the installation thereof, i.e., the size and con- figuration, the location, the method of fasten- ing or securing, the methods for servicing and inspecting, etc. - 00452 -6- i kTICT.E III. BASIC SERVICES OF ARCHITECT (conr'd) g. Endeavor to secure compliance by the Contractor with the contract documents, making reasonable effort to see that they avoid errors, and omissions. (The Architect, however, shall not be responsible for the performance of Contractors) . h. In the event this Agreement is terminated by either party for any reason whatever, prior to - completion, all the original tracings and specifi- cations and other pertinent documents shall be turned over to the County and shall become the property of the County. i. The Architect shall be held harmless by the County for liabilities that: (1) Result directly from modification or changes of the documents by the County, and (2) result directly from construction execution or practice when the Architect is not retained to provide the construction supervision. F. Time Periods: It is understood and agreed that time is of the essence in this Agreement and the work shall start immediately. Design Development Phase shall be com- pleted within eight (8) weeks. After the Design Development Phase of the Work has been accepted by the County, the Architect shall proceed with all due dili- gence to complete the Construction Document Phase. The Construction Plans and Specifications shall be ready for printing of the contract documents within -7- 40463 I'RTICLE III. BASIC SERVICES OF ARCIITTFCi (cont'd) eight (3) weeks of the data authorization is given to the Architect to proceed with the Construction Document Phase. Work on each item of service as speci- fied in this Article shall proceed step-wise upon written notification as provided by this Agreement and until such notification, Architect shall not proceed with any subsequent item of service. ARTICLE IV. EXTRA SERVICES BY THE ARCHITECT A. The following services, insofar as they cause the Architect extra expense, and if authorized by the County, will be paid for by the County as provided in Article V, Paragraph E. 1. Additional work by the Architect caused by an in- crease in the project budget during the Design Development Phase. 2. Preparation of change orders, unless they are for the purpose of correcting an error or omission which is non-beneficial to the project. 3. Supervision of repair of damage to the structure when ` so directed by the County. 4. Arranging for the work to proceed should the Contractor default due to delinquency or insolvency. 5. Providing prolonged contract administration and observa- tion of construction should the construction contract time be exceeded by more than 257. due to no fault of Architect. No extra Payment will be allowed for delays from strikes, weather, etc. which cause the construction to stop. -s- 00464 ?IT_CL IV-. EXTRA SERVICES BY THE ARCHITECT 6. The preparation of measured drawings of existing structures as authorized by the County. 7. Providing and accomodating code and regulatory re- quirements of applicable governing agency which be- come newly effective after the date of advertisement for bids. 8. Attend public meetings in addition to the meetings included in the Basic Services. RTICLE V. ARCHITECT'S FEE A. The County -agrees to pay the Architect for full perform- ance of professional landscape architectural services for the Design Development Phase and the Construction Document Phase, a total fee of thirty thousand dollars($30,000) . B. The County agrees to pay the Architect for full performance ,.,of professional landscape architectural services for the Construction Phase herein, a fee based on hourly rates set forth in "Exhibit A". C. Errors and omissions in the Construction Documents which are discovered before the project is put to bid shall be corrected by the Architect without cost to the County. Services required to make changes in construction resulting from errors and omissions in the Construction Documents which are discovered after the contract is let shall be performed by the Architect without cost to the County. D. The Architect shall reimburse the County for the cost of unnecessary or non-beneficial construction work which is the result of errors and omissions in the Construction Documents. �, -9- 0045.5 I !.a RT-ICLE V. ARCHITECT'S FEE (cont'd) E. Extra services shall not be rendered by the Architect under this Agreement unless they are first authorized in writing by the County. The payment to Architect. for extra services shall be at the rates set forth. in "Exhibit All. F. The Architect's fee specified in Paragraph A, above, except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, shall constitute full compensation to the Architect for the services under this Agreement. 3MCLE VI. PAYMENT UNDER THIS AGREEMENT A. It is agreed that payments to the Architect shall be made as follows: Portion= of Payment No. Basis of Payment Total Fee due 1 50% Completion of Design Development Phase Documents $;3;000 2 Board Approval of Design Development Phase Documents $ ,6,000 3 507. Completion of Const. Plans & Specifications $ 8,000 4 Board Approval of Const. Plans and Specifications $10,000 5 Receipt•of Construction Bids $ 3,000 TOTAL $30,000 B. _...rRayment fog services rendered for the Construction Phase herein,-shall be made on a monthly basis in accordance with the hourly rates set forth in "Exhibit A". C. Extra Services: Payment for extra services shall be made at the rate set forth in Exhibit "A", on a monthly basis, upon submission of a Statement of itemized cost therefore. No extra payment will be made to the Architect for expenses incurred for items of work for which prior written authoriza- tion has not been issued. -lo- 00466 D. Printing Costs: Direct printing costs for final contract documents for bidding purposes will be borne by the County. The County may require additional plans and specifications and will pay only the direct printing of same. ARTICLE VII. DUTIES OF ARCHITECT A. If the lowest bona fide bid received by the County for Phase I of the project exceeds the project budget and if the County so requests, the Architect shall revise the plans and specifications without additional cost to the County so as to bring the cost of the project within the project budget. In the event the Architect is requested to make said revisions, he shall furnish without cost to the County the revised plans and specifications in the nurgber required by the County for rebidding. This provision will be enforceable only if the County advertises for bids within ninety (90) days after final approval of the completed construction documents. B. Architect shall employ all civil, mechanical, electrical, and structural engineers and other consultants as necessary to prepare any item of service listed in Article III. Said consultants shall be licensed by the State of California to perform their special services. All drawings prepared by consultants and included in the contract documents shall bear the appropriate stamp and signature of the appropriate consultant. The structural consultant shall be a registered structural engineer. Each consultant being considered shall receive a copl of this Agreement and shall acknowledge to the Architect in writing, -11- 0046'7 E 7 ?C a. JII. DUTIES OF ARCHITECT (con t'd) with carbon copy to the County, that he has read and under- stands the Agreement and, furthermore, that he agrees to assist the Architect with all the services and duties mentioned herein as they apply to the specialties for which he is re- tained as a consultant. All consultants retained by the Architect shall be approved in writing by the County prior to the execution of this Agreement by the Architect. C. Every employer of labor performing or providing the services to be performed or provided under this Agreement shall carry and pay for such workmen's compensation insurance as is, necessary to fully indemnify himself and to protect his em- ployees under the Workmen's Compensation Insurance and Safety Act of the State of California and to relieve the County from all responsibility thereunder in connection with the perform- ance of the Agreement, and, upon the execution of the Agreement shall file with the_County, for approval as to adequacy, a certificate or certificates that such insurance is in effect. The Architect shall provide a certificate of insurance for errors and omissions or malpractice satisfactory to the County in an amount not less than $100,000 which shall be sent to the County within ten (10) days after the order to proceed is given. A policy containing a deductible-clause of not more than $10,000 is permissible: The Architect shall provide a policy or policies of compre- hensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and -12- 00468 ,;'st .,. :..n,.,���;^;.q�n .:k"r T•,;.-... x .<. _ . .. ,,. .. .. _ ,.._,.__ _. - ---- t f-34f;i F.qg;�,. f :ICI.E VII. DUTIES OF ARCHITECT (cont'd) employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property,- including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. The policy shall name the Public Agency, its officers and employees as additional insureds. Evidence of insurance shall be provided to the County prior to execution of this Agreement. RTICLE VIII. DUTIES OF COUNTY A. The over-all administration of the project, including the general administration of the construction contract, will be accomplished by the Service Area Coordinator of the County Public Works Department, for and on behalf of the County. B. The following will be accomplished by the County: I., Obtain and deliver to the Architect all necessary site information, i.e. , topographic surveys and re- lated information soils studies and soil testing of of whatever kind, etc. 2. The County will review all sketches, drawings, specifi- cations, proposals,contracts, and other documents presented to it by the Architect and will act promptly thereon, notifying the Architect of any and all decisions thereon. -�3- 00469 r 3. The County will act promptly in all matters requiring its attention so as not to unreasonably delay the work of the Architect in the construction of the project. 4. Provide one or more project inspectors who will conduct the day to day construction inspection. Project inspector will report to both the County and the Architect and will be under the general direction of the Architect with respect to technical details. S. Provide all necessary construction testing services. 6. Notify the Architect in writing of apparent deficiencies in materials and workmanship during the guarantee period. 7. Pay all fees required by any division or department of the State California for filing and checking of any item of service prepared by the Architect. 8. Provide 24" x 36" tracing paper for working drawings as required by Architect. 004.70 . Article I\ Cancellation of Agreement or Suspension of Project A. The County or the Architect may cancel or suspend work under this Agreement upon written notice to the other party, for any reason whatever. The Architect shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement in the event of cancellation or suspension. B. In the event of cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, the Architect shall receive cot-ensation as follows: 1. For approved items of service under Article III, compensation shall be in the amount outlined under Article V. for the item of service fully performed by the Architect. 2. For items of service on which a proceed order hes been issued by the County but which have not fully completed and approved, the Architect shall be commensated for the service in an amount proportionate to the a=unt of work actually accomplished. �3. In no event shall the total compensation paid under the immediately -,-preceding paragraphs exceed the total of the payments specified in Article V. for the respective items of service to be furnished by the Architect. C. Upon cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, all rights of the parties shall terminate except as to payments due the Architect under this Article. D. Upon cancellation of this Agreement or suspension of work by either the County or the Architect, the Architect shall furnish to the Couacy all documents and drawings prepared under this Agreement, whether • complete or incocplete, including all reference material provided by the County as specified in Article VIII. Article X Termination of this Agreement This Agreement shall automatically terminate one year from the recorded date of filing of the Notice of Completion. Architectural services required after that termination date, insofar as they relate to-guarantees and warrantees of the project, shall be'compensated as provided under Article V,' Par.E., Extra Services, and shall be performed only upon vritten instructions by the County. •, -16- . 00472 IN t:IiE:ESS W!.ERi—Ox , the County and the Architect have caused their names to be subscribed hereto by their duly auth- orized representatives on the date appearing on the first page of this Agreement. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ARCHITECT PUBI.IC t?U :'S DIRECTOR By B Vernon L. Cine blame Title Public Works Director dba RECO'ePMENDED FOR APPROVAL: 0,1 '''HUK G. WILL., COUNTY ADt11NISTRATOR J- 1 R. 11. Rygh, Dep Pu is Wor s Director FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN County Counsel Deputy -17T 00473 4 ARCHITECTURAL AGS:EE FENT EXHIBIT "A" -CHARGE RATES A. 1. Time by Classification of Personnel: Principal Architect $ 40.00 Associate Architect 28.00 Assistant Architect 25.00 Draftsman 19.00 Clerical 16.00 _ 2. Consultants: Architect's consultants time for additional services shall be paid at Architect's cost which shall be com- puted by applying the applicable above rates to con- sultant s personnel. Detailed statements of con- sultant's bills shall be submitted as part of Architect's bill for services. 3. Transportation: Cost to Architect for transportation will be considered as included in the above charges and no extra payment %Will be made therefore. Expenses for essential trips to areas outside the Bay Area will be reimbrused by the County only when the County has issued prior written approval therefore. -ls" 00474 w. E.%TIBIT B PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT FOR . COMMUNITY PARK NUU BER ONE r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 SAN RAMON VALLEY 00V5 INTRODUCTION The "San Ramon Valle} Park and Recreation Master Plan" desig- nated the 43± acre parcel adjacent to Monte Vista High School for a community park to serve the northeastern portion of County Service Area R-7. The Master Plan noted that "while tho site has a rolling hill topography which would not be suitable for intense development, its proximity to the high school and Los Cerros Intermediate School provides the opportunity fdr joint use of facilities. . . ." "The site has an unsurpassed 360° view of the San Ramon Valley and the Diablo and Las Trampas Ranges. Many passive uses can be integrated into its development while intense sport-field acti- vities can be conducted on adjacent school grounds. In addition this park could be a major staging and/or resting place along the soon to be implemented regional trail linking Las Trampas Regional Wilderness with Air. Diablo State Park." As expressed in the Master Plan, one of the major goals of the Citizens Advisory Committee is to involve the local community- in determining what facilities should be developed at each park site. A great deal of data was accumulated during the prepara- tion of the Master Plan which can be utilized as a starting point for discussions and meetings with community residents. DATA,ANALYSIS Neighborhood Preferences Analysis of the questionnaires distributed last year indicate that the present recreational activities of the Monte Vista area neighborhoods are quite similar to those of the entire San Ramon Valley. The seven most frequently mentioned activities being swimming, family picnicking, bicycling, fishing, tennis, walk- ing and hiking. Under facilities most desired the Monte Vista area again listed the same seven facilities as the entire Valley. The seven most frequently mentioned being bicycling, family pic- nic, tennis, swimming, fishing, Biking, and recreation-teen center. Other facilities which were also frequently mentioned included an amphitheater, creative play areas, horse trails, volleyball, nature study and free play turfed areas. Facilities Available at Adjacent Schools The following facilities are available at Monte Vista High School and Los Cerros Junior High School: a standard lighted track and football complex, four tennis courts, several hard courts, base- 00476 ..n. ':.M:-,' .;,•,". _ .: i .�<-° , ..a"Lt>rn .» ..-r r..(;y, 'F =:^e._ .,...R' a .... .d.y5t7 ,kC ... _. .,, . -'TM'Y+i..pjr,,._. i ball fields and large turfed areas. Fioticeably absent is a swimming pool. Several buildings and classrooms could be utilized for recreation and meeting rooms. There is also vacant land on school property adjacent to the park site. Preliminary Program dotes Based on the questionnaires showing the Monte Vista neighborhood's preferences for recreation facilities and the facilities available at the schools, a preliminary program should consider inclusion of the following items: bicycling course, picnic areas (family and group), tennis courts, swimming pool, fishing pond, walking and jogging paths, amphitheater, creative play areas, view overlooks, free play turfed areas, recreation -teen center (existing buildings), bicycle moto-cross, volleyball (grass courts), horse trail link and staging area, and nature study area. Proposed Proaram for Development - General The following program proposal is the result of a thorough meshing of data collected from the Service Area Master Plan, the site analysis, and land use studies, several community meetings and the Service Area Advisory CoRmittee. It . is meant to be a starting point for definitive planning for this park site, and not necessarily the blueprint for the final end-product. As planning progresses, this program will no doubt be modified by changing priorities and the realities of detailed economic studies. Several issues concerning use of this site must receive thorough treatment during the design stages and also during the operation of the completed facility: access must be kept to a minimum to enhance after-hours control - preferably limited to Stone Valley Road and the high school parking lot; fencing should be substantial in construction but not institutional in appearance, extending the full length of the perimeter of the site; entry points must be so designed to allow pedestrians, bicycles and equestrians access to the facilities and to deny access to motor- driven conveyances; on- oing enforcement of the prohibition of motor-driven con- veyances from the site other than in the parking lots) must be complemented by a serious public education effort concerning appropriate uses of the park. Proposed Program for Development - Specific Parking Areas - 50 cars, lighting. Play Area - adventure type using existing topography. Picnic Areas - group and individual, barbeques. Paths and Viewpoints - Location maps, benches. Horse Trails, staging area, practice ring - trailer parking. Par Course - exercise stations. Ponds - one of approximately 2-1/2 acres and one of 1-1/2 acres for fishing and nature study. Tennis Courts - four courts, lighting. Bicycle Trails Course - competition Area. Nature Areas - natural plantings, paths, benches, identification signs. Amphitheater - 200 seat capacity, stage, lighting. Road Frontage Improvements. 004'7.1 @WMrf >, PROPOSED DEVELOPI-TVir PHASES . Phase I Parking Areas $25,000 Play Area 10,000 - Picnic Areas 10,080 Paths - Viewpoints 50,000 Horse Trails - Staging ARea 20,000 ' Par Course 10,000 Pond 20,000 Turf and Planting 25,000 Road Frontage and Utilities 30,000 Professional Design Consultant 30,000 30,00 Contingency 20,000 Sub-Total $2250,000 Phase II Tennis Courts $50,000 Play Area 10,000 Picnic Areas 18,000 Paths - Viewpoints 30,000 Bicycle Trails Course 5,000 Service Structures 40,000 Pond 10,000 Planting 15,000 Nature Areas 8,080 Amphitheater 35,000 $221,000 { Contingency 29,000 Sub Total $250,000 00478 TOTAL $500,000 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 10 , 119 2A In the Matter of Resignation from Reclamation District No. 799. The Board having received a November 19, 1976 letter from Mr. Richard Rockwell, Secretary, Reclamation District No. 799, advising that Mr. Cyril A. Billeci has resigned as a trustee of said district and transmitting names of three nominees for appointment consideration; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignation of Mr. Cyril A. Billeci is ACCECPTED. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corrod copy of an order uttered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: ins'. R. Rockwell Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Suuervisor—elect E. EasseltiAuPervisors Public Information Officer affixed this3Ctbday of November 19 76 County administrator County Counsel , -� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk r-, B r l r Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-24 3r,6 Ism 00479 . . . __ _. �,_. . . -.__-tea_ •�.:,. !1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia november 30 , 19 766 In the Matter of Authorizing Compensation for Use of San Damiano Retreat Facilities, Danville IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to compensate San Damiano Retreat, Danville, California in the amount of $ 812 for use of their facilities in connection with the Management Development Seminar for Contra Costa County Department Heads to be conducted during the period December 1 - 2, 1976. Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. `-' Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Personnel Witness cc: County Auditor-Controller off6ed this30t;h day of november . 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OI_SSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Miffy Cra 00480 H-24 3176 ISm ti s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointment of Alternate to the San Francisco Bay Area Transit Finance Study Steering Committee. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, a representative of the Metronolitan Transportation Commission on the San Francisco Bay Area Transit Finance Study Steering Committee, having recom— mended that Mr. A. G. ::ill, County Administrator, be designated as his alternate on said Committee With full voting privileges; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Moriarty is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. _ Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: "etronolitan Supervisors Transportation Comm- issiotcffiued this 30 day of November 19 76 County Administrator Public Information J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Officer n By '/c< �`-`��`/� t �,�� . Deputy Clerk �feanne 0. Maglio ".24 3176`'m 00481 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 19 76 In the Matter of Submission of Weatherization Proposal to State Office of Economic Opportunity by Contra Costa County Office of Economic Opportunity in the amount of $24,000 for weatherization material to compliment the existingg Housing Rehab- i 1 nation Program in the County, The Board hereby AUTHORIZES the Chairman of the Board to approve submission of a Weatherization Proposal to State Office of Economic Opportunity by Contra Costa County Office of Economic Opportunity in the amount of $24,000 for weatherization material to compliment the existing Housing Rehabilitation Program in the County. APPROVED BY THE BOARD November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori g. Dept.: OEO Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this 30thday of November 1976 f J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Ely Clerk Maxine M. NeufAd H-24 1!76,Sm 00482 1A r Fast County Oliwa Office of Economic (�/ i 240 E.4th Street -. V V111;d Pntsb4rg.California 94565 Opportunity (4151 4394M Ext.338 Wat county Office Central O(lice r(�' ,n City Hall•Room 278 94804 1157 Thompson Street WLl 1 Conlro CoS1a CountyRichmond,0 WZfxt. 271 Martinez,Caliiomia 94553 _•_, � � 14151233.7080 Ext 3271 (4151372.2227 r; r RC�-�j �� r-- Judy Ann Miller ;,,-' �� l 1,37'- Acting Director Office of pIEMORAMD County Administrator To Arthur G. :+illCounty Administrator OAT.: November 23, 1976 Attn: Bob Alaniz f FROM Judy Ann Miller, Director ; •. :fi t�;/f ..- SUBJECT: IVEATHERIZATiON PROPOSAL. Attached is the proposal I submitted to State OEO requesting $24,000 for weatherization material to compliment the existing housing rehabilitation program in the County. You will note that the bulk of the money is $21,600 forsupplies for weatherization material such as bat type insulation for ceilings, weather stripping for doors and windows, caulking for cracks and joints, etc. $2,400 is for use of consultants as necessary in terms of weatherization and energy conservation. This proposal was submitted to State OEO because of a short deadline requirement without securing the approval of the EOC and Board of Supervisors. However. it was submitted with the understanding that if we do not subsequently receive approval, the proposal would be withdrawn. By action at its November 18 meeting, the EOC endorsed the submission of the proposal. I am requesting approval to submit the proposal be secured from the Board of Supervisors at its November 30th meeting. JM d Attacchment RECEIVED Att cc: Clerk of the hoard NOV.70 1976 J. R CiSAN aERK BOARD Of SUPERVISORS L IRA A Microfilmed with board order 00483 OEO 37 it.. 21691 o- . ... ........ .. "?*.W: r ... ..... 1$ i November 5, 1976 �- MIFF.'% ;Yjr PIA COUNTY 00.7.2Itt?IITY ACTION AGENCY 1'Ft)POSAL for CON N I TY SERV I CES AN41 tI I STRATI ON EMERGENCY ENERGY CONSEIRVAT I OPV PROGRAM Description of Problem (The Deed) Contra Costa County has a significant rn=3er of low-income people living along the no-them and western boundaries of the county, adjacent to large bodies of water (San Pablo Bay, Carquinez Strait, Suisun and Honker (jays, Sacramento and, San Joaquin Rivers). The climatic conditions under which these people live is that of cold nights, high winds, and fog. Dwellings in these areas were sons of the first built in the county, as development centered around the rater routes. As economic interests withdrew to the canter of the county, and mare stable weather, these dwellings became the residences of ethnic minorities and low income people. The areas of North Richmond, Radeo, !-It. View (14artinez), Hest Pittsburg and Oakley (which are located in the areas. dascribed above) are specific areas with a high percentage of low income, many of whom. reside in deteriorated housing. According to 1970 Census inform ition, 1160 residents of North Richmond are low Income; in Rodeo, 719 resident. are low iscams; in Mt. View (Martinez), 778 residents are low income; in I+e:.t Pit 11sburg, 1607 residents are low income; and In Oak I ay, 763 res i dents are 1 ox. i n;one. As a result of a survey by the County Building Inspection Department of the condition of homes in three of these above five areas, the following information was obtained: y Prior to the energy problem there was no mandatory requirement for Insulation. We may then assume that housing construction prior to 1969-70 and in the older sections of town lack ceiling and wall insulation as well as weather stripping. This would break down into the approximate numbers as follows: North Richmond: Of the 688 dwelling units (including duplexes and apartments) none o the units contained insulation or weather stripping when constructed. (See Attachment A) Rodd: Of the 11:9 dwel l ing uiii is (including duplexes and apartments), 765 could nut m- t any :taniard of xuati�:•ri .m:i�,n. (Sae Attachment 8) blt. View %artinuzi: Of the 456 dwelling units (including duplexes and aparbiants), 237 would not m?at se.m'rheriz.ition standards. (See Attachment C) A survey has not yet been co:Wleted on dwelIinu units in Best Pittsburg and Oakley. However, the conditions of Vest Pittsburg in one stiction are similar to 00484 Miv0fi1'MW viith board order --__.._---rya.;.r se,�q-,c�•.�..�.�,,,. page 2. North Richmond, and in another section; to Rodeo. The conditions of Oakley are similar to those of Mt. View. PRESENT EFFORTS The first, sacond and projected third year activities within the County's Community Development Program includ-a a Housing Rehabilitation Grant and Loan program for owner-occupants of substandard housing units in the above mentioned target areas. Work and items of repair eligible under this program are primarily to make repairs and improvements necessary to the structure to correct health and safety hazards and to make other necessary repairs and improvements in order to conform to code standards. Energy Conservation/weatherization Is not a part of this program because of the limited availability of funds. (NOTE: There is a minimal amount of replacement of heaters and windows as it relates to code enforcement and health and safety standards). A companion program to the Housing Rehab program is a Housing Counseling b Training Program which is aimed at providing occupants of rehabilitated housing and other residents of the community with training assistance in preventative and corrective maintenance to enable them to maintain their houses in a safe, healthful and attractive manner. Methods to weatherize homes and to conserve energy could be a part of tK i s training program with the proper resources. PROPOSED EFFORTS TO MEET THE NEED (PROPOSED PROGRAI4) The program that is proposed it two-fold:- 1) (OBJECTIVE 1) TO PROVIDE MATERIALS SUCH AS BAT TYPE INSULATION FOR CEILINGS, HEATHER STRIPPING FOR DOORS AND tilINW3S AND CAULKING FOR CRACKS AND JOINTS, TO BE UTILIZED IN THOSE HOMIES THAT ARE BEING REHABIVITATED UNDER THE =44UNITY DEVELORIENT REHABI LITATIOQV PiROGRAI•i. APPROXIMATELY 25-35 HOUSEHOLDS WILL BE PROVIDED MATERIALS. The limited availability of funds in the Community Development Rehabilitation Program does not allow for weatherization to take place. Personnel from the County Building Inspection Department, which administers the Community Development Rehabilitation Program, state that there is a great deal of heat loss in those homes that have been inspected and those that have been (or will be) rehabilitated because of lack of proper insulation. Consequently, fuel costs are and will remain high and heat loss will continue for these low income residents unless insulation material is installed. With the purchase of the needed weatherization materials through the CSA Emergency Energy Conservation Program, the labor to install the insulation will be included in the over-all cost of rehabilitating the homes which is borne by the Community Development Program. 2) (O-rUECfIVE 2) TO PROVIDE Tf.c1':1tt, 10 UK,; INCOME RESIDENTS OF T11E C0:24UNITY IN BAS 1 C MEATI iERI ZAT I Q`t V.O Rig :c:.1) TO FEt�IVIDE t LATER 1 ALS SUCH AS BAT TYPE I NSUUAT I ON FOR CEILINGS. HEATHER STi?I r P I l G FOR DOORS A14D W I NDO:15 A7'tD CAULKING FOR CRACKS AND JOIIIiS TO EU BLE RESID-Ull TU INSTALL TtiEIR Own wEATHERIZATION I•IATERIALS_ _ APPROXIMATELY 55-60 PERM-15 WILL BE PNOVIDED TRAINING AND MATERIALS. TRAIHING Il I LL ALSO BE PROV 1 DED IN 1 ENERGY CONSERVAT 1 C.1. (I NFOIV4AT I ON AND ENERGY CONSERVAT I OU EDUCAT I Ot t PROGI:.N•G). APPPDX I t 1ATELY 150-200 PERSONS WILL BE PROV I DED WITH ENERGY CONSERVATION 1 IIFOi•7 JIT 1 O.4 AND EDUCAT I O.t. 0048-5 ............ 3 All those who are In need of weatherizafiion assistance will not be benificiaries of the Community Development Rehabilitation Program because of the limited funds in that program, and hence would not be included in if above. However, the Housing Counseling d Training Program, (administered by OEO and funded with Community Development funds) which is designed to train not only residents of rehabilitated homes but also olhsr residents in the community in corrective and preventative maintenance, would include training of low income residents in basic weatherizafiion work and energy conservation, provided that training materials, training assistance, and weatherization materials were made available through Community Services Administration Emergency Energy Conservation funds. 00486 .., ..� ,I�n_xka. '""=M _.. .� .. ...`a _ra nix•,_ �, _x M:.c!-s..� -9 �-a,�i�� A { 411 ( h _ J•= , a O "'74 �t i \ L 't �� 1;• y Fl tt� j �j tU r1 0 C) f( 4 y 1 t? C h .t N U ,) o u p O O O Cco G W ^ � ^r C C } a O ca d GW y s V uu -C -40 u LC1 b V"J _ c Ln T Nx O < C O p © O1+ w ^' p p C -� U < c v-} ca o ti 1 N( N Q i d O JC Of d� o ri ILI L W J 4 L G71 O# u L. C d T i U NE p!i r N L ;;! M N N L Os 1 a ! CL O ., c c O Nl ., F p < o w ► C t 2 c o —k �I c a o c N a• c c-I, —i < res < 0� 'E �` t r m > r o r o � L m lt! N N t^ a I � p U a p 2 >= G d n a p v 13 IL cn I a �� �• is F z o w El -Lf dri C t ` r ! z m t i, L w coaL C) = Chi O 1L- x �t ? ►- 1 j L Jo- Lij O �' o �a 4� 4— Y, i� �' < C))�` + c": 4- U C t?r U; C.� cJ. I:!M C n' of .a3' dI C V tA 0 0 C3 U ci ! s a L Q Ll1: u C /y tli { Ch Cit C� �^ Cf O c to CJ U Ch w 4 eK 6 C � a rC < !-t 4 r•1 rz u Uuv o{o: n Fi ' e L r f 0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of contract with Community Program Volunteer Provider Under the National Influenza Program of 1976 The Board having considered the recommendation of Dr. Orlyn Wood,, County Health Officer, regarding standard form contracts for the provision of a community program for swine influenza immunization under the National Influenza Program of 1976 administered by the California State Department of Health, IT IS'BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Health Officer or her designee is AUTHORIZED to execute, on behalf of the County, said standard form contract with the following named Contractors: CONTRACTORS CONTRACT NUMBERS Contra Costa County Medical Services SF 213 PASSED BY THE BOARD on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Attn: Contracts 5 Grants Unit th November cc: County Administrator affixed this'30 day of 19 76 County Health Officer Contractor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bye' Deputy Clerk MaAne M. Neuf d EH: a�y't.iSni 00488 I C:).:r:1 Costa count..! Health Oepartaent (:rational influea a Pro.{ran of 1976) Number SF a13 1. Parties. the County of Contra Costa. California (County), for its Health Department, an! the follo«lag na.^..ed Comity ProAnjim Volunteer (Contractor) mutually agree anus. capn : :raSr !•alunterr: C�pr;�,y Contra Costa County Medical Services eity. liaspital/Clinic 2500 Alhambra Aveaue, Martinez, California 94S53 2, T;-rm. TaL- effective date of this Contract is and it t.._-.:inates _ unless sooner b tten mutual consent, or `.,; =.t^.er �_ day advance uritten notice th:::eof to the other. 3, i':.^,mat. ::.j paiynents shall be made by either party to the other under this Contract. Co=unity Program Volunteer shall provide those services under the `national InI::ent3 Program or 1976 described iu the Service Plan attached hereto which is iaeorporated herein by reference, subject to ull the trams and conditions container: or incorporated herein. 5. = aiact. This Contract implements in part the Rational Influenza Program of 1976 and the State of California Sulne Influenza Immunization Program as specified in State of Cal:=ornia (Department of Health)/Contra Costa County Agreement 129-220, the application and ?proval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference_ 6. L;:zal Autaority_ This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following le;a'_ authorities: California Government Code Section 856.6 7. :.ssignaert. The Co=unity Program Volunteer shall not assign or transfer this Contract. 8. La_.',ernlficatioa. The Community Program Volunteer scall defend, save harmless and i.: :y the Country and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and cl.:s°--., for damagas for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including zt limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or co-inreted vith the operations or the services of the Community Program Volunteer acr:urde , resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Community Program Vol-an--tier, its a tints or employees, or any other person or entity. 9, Sitatures. These siSnatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CO,=Y . CONTR.-._ CO3�1:`tif`tITT PROGRAM VOLUNTEER (Contractor) E.; By. De ignee Mmiwel lt4rectnr (Designate official capacity) I, the person signing above, do by that signature hereby certify that I am author- ized to execute this Contract, that I as actin; for the Contractor in signing this Contract pursuant to a resolution of its Form- Approved ht the California governing body or other pertinent authority State Department of Healthrequired by the Contractor, and, further, that if approval of this Contract by Contractor's governing body is required, that such approval has been obtained. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on Havemher 4 1916 , atpartinez llifornia. UITNESS: By t3_aadard ?ora Approved by County Counsel) Medical Staff Secretary (Designate official capacity) Microfilmad vAth board order 00489 SERVICE FULN (National influenza Program of 1976) A. Prey;ram. 1.. The Contractor shall participate in the National Influenza Program of 1976 as a coc-nunity program volunteer to provide swine influenza immunization under California Government Code Section 856.6_ 2. The Contractor shall use its own premises or premises under its control as the location for immunization activities related to its program under this Contract. 3. The Contractor shall not charge vaccinees a fee to cover any services under this Contract, includi=g the costs of storing or administering the vaccine. 4. i'he cc=-=ity program shall be completed by the termination date of this Contract. B. Vaccination Supplies. 1. he Contractor shall use County supplied vaccine and be responsible for pick up of such vaccine from a County designated location. 2. The Contractor shall ensure that vaccine is protectively stored as required, using County approved methods for such storage. 3. The Contractor shall provide all equipment and supplies necessary for partici- patina as a community program, except for vaccine and certain equipment and supplies as the County may make available. C. Personnel. 1. The Contractor shall provide all personnel required by County for participation as a community program. 2. The Contractor shall ensure that a California licensed physician, registered nurse, or licensed vocational nurse will be-present at all times to administer the vaccine. Such physician or nurse shall be clearly identified, and shall be available to an3wer questions from prospective vaccinees concerning the vaccine, its contra- indicdtiens, its nor=al risks, and its expected benefits. Such physician or nurse shall be familiar with: , a. treatment of possible anaphylactic reactions, b. contraindication for the administration of such immunizing agents, and c. administration of, treatment, and reactions to such immunizing agents. 3. Contractor shall =ate provisions for emergency treatment of vaccinees. 4. In t-e -:Vent that a ;et injector apparatus is used in this community program, Contractor a=ems that it will be operated and maintained solely by persons holding a currently valie certificate from the California Department of Health, authorizing them to operate and maintain the apparatus, or by a licensed physician, registered nurse, or licensed vocational nurse. D. Informed Particioation for Vaccinees. 1. The County shall furnish to the Contractor the informed consent/registration forms supplied to the County by the State Department of Health. The Contractor agrees to provide each prospective vaccinee with a copy of such form in a language understandable to :iia vaccinee. Tn_ Contractor further agrees that at least one person shall be present at ar.? location smarm vaccinations are administered, whose duty it shall be to distribute the !or--s to pru:pactive vaccinees and to ensure that each vaccinee understands all the information contained therein, including the provisions regarding waiver of liability. Such p-erson shall be clearly identified and shall be present at all times when the vaccine is being administered. . t -l- 00490 w ..:YEAmrmrw". ......_._�...�. IZ1 ...¢ u SERVICE PU0 (National Influenza Program of 1976) 2. The Contractor assumes responsibility for documentation of informed consent and ackruwledgemeut of waiver of liability. The Contractor mall obtain a signed informed consent/registration form described in Paragraph D.l. from each vaccFnee. Where the p-trsoa to be vaccinated is a minor, the Contractor .hall obtain a signed copy of this form from the minor's parent or guardian. Contractor shall deliver all such signed copi._s to the County at the conclusion of the community program, together with such reports as may be required by the County or the State Department of Health. 3. The Contractor agrees that no prospective vaccinee in this community program shall be offered any inducement or reward, financial or otherwise, for receiving immual=ation; nor shall any vaccinee be told that he/she will be penalized in any way, financial or otherwise, for failure to receive immunization. Contractor warrants that all publicity and promotion of the community program which " the ;subject of this agreement sha'3_1 contain notice that a waiver of liability is required of each person to be vaccinated. 4. The Contractor agrees that all promotions of the community program, written or oral, shall contain notice of the waiver of liability required by Government Code Section 556.6 (Statutes 1976, Ch. 427.) E. Ins2ection. The County and State, through their authorized representatives, have the right at all reasonable times to inspect or otherwise evaluate tate work performed or being performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed. F. State Required Fair Employment Practices. 1. The Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment be;ause of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and .election for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and appliennts for employment, notices to he provided by the State setting forth the provisions of the Equal Opportunity clause. 2. The Contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or ou behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. 3. The Contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding a notice, t.o be provided by the State, advising the labor union or workers' representative of the Contractor's commitments under this Equal Opportunity clause and shall post copies of the nati_e 4n conspicuous alae&; available to employees and applicants for employment. 4. The Contractor will comply with all provisions of Federal Executive Order No. 11246 of Se;:te::�ber 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations and relevant orders of the Seeratary of I.. hor. 5. The Contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Federal Enecutive Order No. 11246 of 5eptemher 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations and orders of the Secretary of labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit aczess to his hooks, records and accounts by the State and the Secretary of Libor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations and orders. 6. In the event of the Contractor's noncompliance with the discrimination clause of this contract or with any of such Federal rules, regulations, or orders, this contract n.ty he cancelled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Contractor may be declared ineligible for further State contracts in accordance with procedures authorized it, Federal Executive Order So. 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Federal Executive Order No. 11246 of See;itambcr 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of labor, or as other-rise provided by law. 00491. -2- -M • SERVICE PLAN (National Influenza Program of 1976) 7. The Contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Federal Executive Order No. 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The Contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the State may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions for noncompliance - provided, however, that in the event the Contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the State, the Contractor may request.in writing to the.State, who, in turn, may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the State and of the United States_ G. Nondiscri=ination is Services. Benefits, and Facilities. The Contractor will not discriminate against the intended beneficiaries of funds monitored by the State because of race, color, creed, national ori.-in, or sex in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or as otherwise provided by law. For the purpose of this contract, distinctions on the grounds of race, color, creed, or national origin include but are not limited to the following: denying a participant any service or benefit or availability of a facility; providing any service or benefit to a participant which is differcnt, or is provided in a different manner o: at a different time from that provided to other participants under this contract; subjecting a participant to segregation or separate treat=ent in any matter related to his receipt of any service; restricting a participant in any way in the enjoyment of any advantage or pAvilege enjoyed by others receiving any service or benefit; treating a participant differently from others in determining 4hetber he satisfies any admission, enrollment quota, eligibility, membership, or other requirement or condition which individuals must meet in order to be provided any service or benefit; the assignment of times or places for the provision of services on the basis of the race, color, creed, or national origin of the participants to be served. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that intended beneficiaries are provided services without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. _�- 00492 'J __... _ • Y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , ig 76 In the Matter of Claim for Loss of Personal Property Pursuant to County Ordinance Code Section 36-8.1604, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to reimburse Deputy Sheriff Gregory W. Moore the sum of $47.00 for loss of personal property (clothing) incurred in the line of duty. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Hoard of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Sheriff—Coroner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County auditor—Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 30th day of November , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By a Deputy Clerk Mai ine M. Ne ld 00493 H 24 8/75 10M �C a E w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving and Authorizing Payment r of Claim(s) for Relocation Assistance W.O. 5323.926 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Relocation Assistance Claim Forms are APPROVED and the County Principal Real Property Agent is AUTHORIZED ; to sign the claim forms on behalf of the County. Reference Claim Date Payee Amount County Civic Center 11-9-76 Joseph A. Kelly $35.00 Work Order No. 5323 County Civic Center 11-2-76 A. E. Haycraft 215.00 Work Order No. 5323 r i The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw warrant(s) in the amount(s) specified to be delivered to the County Real Property Division. PASSED by the Board on November 30. 1976 r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of r Supervisors affixed this 30th day of November , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Originator: Public Works Department DlaAne M. Neufe d Real Property Division cc: Auditor-Controller Public Works Department County Administrator 00494 H 2+ aps IOM d F7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 Z6 In the Matter of ' Application for Leave to Present Late Claim. Mr. David Srashna, Attorney at Law, Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation, P.O. Box 1669, Richmond, CA 94801 having filed an application for leave to present late claim for damages on behalf of Leonard Colbert on October 29, 1976 in the amount of $25,614.03; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid applica— tion to present late claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Attorney for Claimant Win's my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public ."orks Director Supervisors Attn. Mr. R. Broatch ofr'ixed this 30tWay of November 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Sheriff—Coroner ByDeputy Clerk Helen C. ldarshall H-24 5176 15m 004"5 �III � w W.., _' CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION MAW OFFICE P.O.BOX 1669 332 TENTH STREET.RICHMOND.CALIFORNIA 94601 TnrPWXM 233-9994 13 at 223-9980 0 EUGENE M.SWANN P.O.BOX 790 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 109 EAST FIFTH STREET October 27, 1976 t_ , PITTSBUR^..CA.94569 L'J TLtE7MON4!`99.9164 wrroRHEYs: ((�� GEORGEES E.CHAFY ADDRESS REPCYTO: GEORGE E.CHAFFEY PATRICK S.FILTER LE JIM GONZAU= Richmond JON A.JOHNSEN DAVID KRASHNA O 1., 2 9 1976 - SARA M.LAKE ZONA SAGE L MESE WJ. IL OISSON , IGHT Board of Supervisors olcl<W SUPWISOas Contra Costa County _A� (.PSZA Co. Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Re: Request for Leave to File Late Claim Dear Members of the Board: I am requesting your leave to file a late claim on behalf of Mr. Leonard Colbert against Contra Costa County pur- suant to the provisions of Government Code Section 911.4, 911.6 and 915. Mr. Colbert has a property damage and personal injury claim as the result of actions of deputy marshals of the San Pablo Marshal's Office. His proposed claim is attached hereto. Mr. Colbert brought his claim to me as his attorney approximately one month after the incident giving rise to his claim. The pertinent incident occurred on March 10, 1976. During the initial interview, Mr. Colbert asked me to assist him with a related debt problem. My understanding was that Mr. Colbert desired me to help him with the debt matter and to await his go ahead with the police claim. Instead, Mr. Colbert informed me sometime beyond the 100 day claim period that he intended that I file the claim based on the facts given to me during the initial interviec:. This misunderstanding and mistake constitutes the basic reason for this request to file a late claim. My client, Mr. Colbert, did not timely remind me about filing his claim because of his thorough preoccupation with defending criminal charges brought against him. Mr. Colbert finally did inquire concerning the status of his claim after his trial was completed but beyond the 100 day period. His state of mind was that he need not check: on me because he had left the matter in my hands. 1. 00496 Mlcrdilmed wlffi board order 1 a Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County October 27, 1976 I respectfully request permission to file the attached late claim. I submit that my mistake and inadvertence happens occasionally when dealing with a multiplicity of clients and cases. Please notify me of your decision. by sending notice to the address in the letterhead. Mr. Leonard Colbert's address is 100 Ohio Avenue, Richmond, California. Very truly yours CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES .YOUNDATION '� �. - `moi%�• — DAVID KRASHNA ATTORNEY AT LAW DR;vh Enclosure 2. 00497 _ fij Q4 ; `p d, CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION MAIN OFFICE P.O.BOX 1669 332 TENTH STREET.RICHMONO.CALIFORNIA 94601 TnZPW U6 233-9954 Q DR 233.9960 p EUGENE M.SWANN P.O.BOX 790 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR October 27, 1976 105 EAST FIFTH STREET PITTSBURG,CA.94763 '43 TELZPUCP 9.9164 ATTORREYS: JAMES O.BARNEY ADDRESS REPLY TO: GEORGE E.CHAFFEY PATRICK S.FILTER JIM GONZALEZ JON A.JOHNSEN Richmond DAVID KRASHNA SARA M.LAKE ZONA SAGE LEE F.SMITH JAMESG.WRIGHT Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Re: Claim of Leonard Colbert Dear Members of the Board: I hereby claim on behalf of Mr. Leonard Colbert personal injury and property damages against Contra Costa County as the result of the wrongful actions of two members of the San Pablo Marshal's Office. On March 10, 1976, Deputy Marshals Burgin and Smyrni observed the claimant's automobile parked at the location of 4th and Chesley Streets in North Richmond. Claimant's automobile was the subject of a Writ of Execution issued by the San Pablo Small Claims Court, West Judicial District, in favor of Firestone Tire Company. The deputies called for a tow truck and proceeded to hitch up the automobile to have it removed. The claimant came out of a nearby building and questioned the deputies about their actions. The claimant states that the deputies were in civilian clothes and failed to identify themselves until they had eventually booked him. Mr. Colbert had received no prior notice of the Writ of Execution or of the underlying judgment. This fact was later established after a criminal trial involving the claimant. The claimant therefore felt that these two unidentified individuals were acting illegally. Mr. Colbert protested against their actions and refused to let the deputies take his car. The deputies then called for the assistance of the Richmond Police Department, and Richmond Police Department Officer Pylant responded. Mr. Colbert had seated himself in the drivers seat of his car with the windows up. The window on the drivers seat was defective and could not be lowered. Deputy Burgin instructed Officer Pylant to remove Mr. Colbert from the automobile. Officer Pylant proceeded to break the window with either his flashlight or nightstick. Officer Pylant and Deputy Burgin forcefully took Mr. Colbert from the car, handcuffed him, and repeatedly beat him%-ith a nightstick on the legs. 1- 00498 3 y. Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County October 27, 1976 At the same time Deputy Smyrni sprayed mace twice into the claimant's eyes during the arrest. The deputies then took Mr. Colbert to _ Brookside Hospital for medical treatment for his wrists and legs and eyes, and later transported him to County Jail in Martinez. The claimant asserts that the deputies acted illegally, wrongfully and used excessive force in his arrest. Mr. Colbert further contends that the deputies' actions caused an escalation of violence which resulted in his bodily harm and great mental anguish. As a direct, proximate and causal result of Deputy Burgin and Smyrni's actions, Mr. Colbert suffered property damage to his 1973 Camaro automobile which is still unrepaired. Here is the estimate of work and costs: Replacement of windshield $ 257.00 and left door glass Body repair and paint job 357.03 TOTAL $ 614.03 Mr. Colbert also suffered bodily pain and harm as well as mental anguish as the result of the beating by the deputies and Officer Pylant. Mr. Colbert claims $25,000 for his persona'_ injuries and $614.03 for his property damage for a total claim of $25,614.03. You may use my address listed in the letterhead to send notices in this claim. Leonard Colbert's address is 100 Ohio Avenue, Richmond, California. Very truly yo�ur96-r CONTRA COSTA LE(6;�11SERVICES FOUNDATION Z: DAVI ffiv� ATTORNEY AT LAW DR:vh cc: Mr. Leonard Colbert 2. 00499 ry �Y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Legal Defense. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County provide legal defense for Mr. Edward W. Leal, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, in Court Action No. C76-210-CFP, Ms. Jan E. Newton, Plaintiff, reserving all the rights of the County in accord- ance with provisions of California Government Code Sections 825 and 995. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. j cc: County Treasurer—Tax Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Collector Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 30thday of November , 1976 Public Works Director Attn: Mr. R. Broatch County Auditor-Controller -� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator BV ,' Deputy Clerk � Maxine M. Neuf d H-24 3/76 15m 00500 h In ire Berard of Surervisars of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Contra Costa Community College District Use of Probation Facilities IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Contra Costa Community College District is AUTHORIZED to use classroom facilities at the Probation Department office at 2525 Stanwell Drive, Concord, for classes and workshops related to Criminal Justice Administration, Correctional Case Work, and other related courses throughout the period 10/27/76 - 1/23/79, as covered by Certification of Insurance. PASSED BY THE BOARD ON November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Orig.: Probation Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Probation Officer Supervisors Public Works Director efFix d this 30thdoy of November 1976 Diablo Valley College Attn: Dr. C. K. Sapper Los Medanos Col I eee J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Community College District By� Deputy Clerk County Administrator Maxine M. Neuf d 00501 Y 7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 76 In the Matter of Filling of Class III Vacancy on the Economic Opportunity Council by the Fil-American Association as recommended by the Rules Committee of the EOC and approved by the EOC The Board hereby AUTHORIZES the Chairman to approve the filling of a Class ill vacancy on the Economic Opportunity Council by the I'll- American Association as recommended by the Rules Committee of the Economic Opportunity Council who, after filing a vacancy notice in the paper, reviewed for membership three organizations who requested to be considered. Upon review, it was the recommendation of this committee, approved by the Economic Opportunity Council, that the Fil-American Association be chosen as currently the Filipino community does not have any representation on the EOC. APPROVED BY THE BOARD November 30, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Economic Opportunity Council Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c/o Office of Economic Supervisors Opportunity affixed this30thday of November 19 76 Fil—American Association c/o OAd County Administrator /. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk J OEO By/L'� , Deputy Clerk • e M. Ned�f (P) H•24 3/7615m 00502 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 3 0 . 19 7 In the Matter of Authorizing Travel to Portland, Oregon for William A. Garrison and Gerald T. Evans, Public Works Department. IT IS BY M BOARD ORDEI M, that the following individuals are AUTHORM to travel to Portland, Oregon to attend the Asphalt Users Technical. Meeting on December 7 and December S, 19176: William A. Garrison, Materials Testing Engineer Gerald T. 'roans, Assistant Materials Testing Engineer Passed by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Admin. Serv. Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 30thday of November 1976 Auditor—Controller 4axini1� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B ' Deputy Clerk e eld H-24 31^,6 ISm 00503 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California November 30 , 19 IL In the Matter of Request for Refund of Portion of Park Dedication Fees, Subdivision 4172, San Ramon Area. The Board on November 2, 1976 having referred to the Director of Planning for report the matter of the request of Albert D. Seeno Construction Company for refund of a portion of park dedication fees paid in connection with the development of Subdivision 4172, San Ramon area; and The Director of Planning having submitted a memorandum report dated November 18, 1976 pertaining to said request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that December 21, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. is FIXED as time to consider the aforesaid matter. PASSED by the Board on November 30, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. cc: Albert D. Seeno Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Construction Company Supervisors 3890 Railroad Ave. affixed this 30thday of November--, 19 76 Pittsburg 94565 Director of Planning County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Uorks Director By GDeputy Clerk San Ramon Valley Unified Helen C. Marshall School District Valley Community Services District H-24 3/76 tSm 00504 ... ..__ .,.:ate.,. -. . - ' NAM RECEIVED ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT CINT TA Co. TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: November IB, 1976 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesuil', SUBJECT: Refund Fee Re: Director of Planni Subdivision 4172 On November 2, 1976, thel�oa�rr�referred to me the request of the Albert D. Seeno Construction Company for refund of park dedication fees pertaining to Subdivision 4172. In connection with Subdivision 4172, the Albert D. Seeou Construction Company paid $15,300 in park dedication fees no February 17, I972, for ninety lots' Sub- division 4172, however, was recorded on February 22, I972 with eighty-six lots. The Albert D. Seeno Construction Company is asking that a refund be granted in the amount of $9,010' This is calculated on the basis of $170 per lot ($15,300 * 90) for fifty-three lots. The four additional lots are those that were never re- corded as part of Subdivision 4172. These four lots are in addition to the forty- nine lots which were involved in the condemnation action and later reverted to acreage' In October, 1971, the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued an order declar- ing a sewer moratorium for this area. Cumneocing in February, 1973, some soften- ing of this moratorium took place although Subdivision 4l72was not an early beneficiary of this. In March, I975, a condemnation proceeding was filed by the Valley Community Ser- vices District (VC3O) and the San Ramon Valley Unified School District to acquire forty-nine lots from Subdivision 4172 for park and school purposes. This Action was settled out-of-court for $258,000 in May, 1976. The Albert D. Seeno Construc- tion Company advises that the paid park dedication fees (applicable portion of $15,300) was not a consideration in this settlement. In August, 1976, the Planning Commission at the request of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and VCSO approved a reversion to acreage of the forty- nine lots acquired for park and school purposes thereby eliminating those lots from Subdivision 4172' Section 920-12'012 (b) of the Ordinance Code provides as follows: If a final subdivision map, development plan, use permit, or building permit becomes invalid because of lapse of time or other legal reason within two years after dedication of land or payment of in-lieu fees, and if the county still retains the land or fee%and if the applicant so requests, the Board may order return to him of such land or fees as the county still retains control of, minus such amount as the Board may determine necessary to reimburse the county for its costs' K����� ' ��«�v��� A&�roG/m 'e6 w�yh ��o�� o6.�er / i Board of Supervisors -2- November 18, 1976 This code section is the most applicable section of the code as to refunds in this matter, though I do not think the section anticipated a series of events such as a moratorium, condemnation and reversion to acreage. Inasmuch as park dedication fees were paid for residential lots that did not come into being, but were, in fact, cancelled out (reverted to acreage), some, if not full considera- tion in acceding to the refund request seems to be warranted as a fair applica- tion of the code. In any case, a refund applicable to four lots should be in order. This would be $680. Park dedication fees paid were based on ninety lots which were indicated on the approved tentative subdivision map. The final subdivision map, however, recorded only eighty-six lots. Fees were paid for four lots that never existed. A copy of this memorandum is being sent to VCSD who may wish to respond to the Board in this matter. AAD:EMA cc - County Administrator County Counsel Supervisor Linscheid Albert D. Seeno Construction Co. VCSD 00506 ki 1 And the Board adjourns to meet on (y�.y, ,!=�1 �1 /�7/ at _ �� in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California. T • . P. Kernan ATTEST: p T C.�i��� T}ep J. R. OZSSON, C+•- RK 00507 17 i 6 r a t Sm-_.X.RY OF ?RCCr._:.D=IGS BEFrRE Ts,_ BOARD OF SGPEMSOPS OF C0,27PRA COSTA COUNTY, NOYc.V3ER 30, 1476, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLEP.K AND ES-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for Assessor, Auditor, Human Resources Agency, Probation, County Clerk-Recorder, Medical Services, Sheriff, and Social Service. Approved appropriation adjust=ents for County Library and Public Works; and internal adjustments not affect -ng totals for Auditor, Probation, Public Works, Human Resources Agency, and County Administrator. Authorised W. Garrison and G. =vans, Public Worts Dept., to attend Asphalt Users Technical Meeting in Portland, OR, Dec. T-8. Approved filling of vacancy onEconomic Opportunity Council by Fil-American Association. Authorised Contra Costa Co=unity College District to use classroom facilities at Probation Dept. office at 2525 Stanwell Drive, Concord. Authorized legal defense for E. Leal, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, in Court Action No. C76-210-CFP. Denied application to present late plal . filed by L. Colbert. Authorized County Principal Real Property Agent to sign Relocation Assistance Claim Forms of J. Selly and A. Haycraft in connection with County Civic Center. Authorized Auditor to reirtbu_-se Zeauty Sheriff G. !bore for loss of personal property incurred in Line of duty. Authorized Health Officer to execute contract with Contra Costa County Medical Services for swine influenza !=uni:atlon program. Approved submission of aeatherizaticn Proposal to State Office of Economic Opportunity for weatherization material to coap2lrent existing Housing Rehabilitation Program. Designated A. Will, County Adsinistrator. as Supervisor Moriarty's alternate on the San Francisco Bay Area Transit Finance Study Steering Committee. Authorised Auditor to compensate San ]sriaro Retreat for use of facilities in connection with Fanagement Developrent Seminar of Contra Costa County Department Heads. Accepted for recording only Offer of Dedication from L. and S. Queirolo for a storm drainage easement along San Ramon Creek required as a condition of approval of Development Permit 3008-76. Approved settlements and authorized Public Works Director to execute Right of flay Contracts and Temporary Construction Permits with Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and M. Gonsalves, et al, in connection with Port Chicago Highway Bridge. Authorized Public Works Director to temporarily close Minnesota Avenue, Brentwood area, to repair bridge over Sand Creek. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Road _mprovetient Agreement :with L. Madrigal required as condition of approval for LUP 2121-75, Antioch area. Authorized Public Works ^irector to execute Architectural Services Agreement with Royston, Hanamoto, Beck 1 Abe; far deve oprent of Co=—mlty Park No. I for CSA R-7, Alano area. Refer--ed to Adrinistration and Finance Co.=!ttee (Supervisors Boggess and ioriarty) for report Dec. 1: matter of funding for Ccm=Unity ?cod and :tutrttion ?roject. 00508 i :7ovember 30. 1976 Su-^a.-•r, continued Page 2 Authorised Chairman to execute the following: Community Develocnent Block Grant Program Project Agreement Nos. 38 and 39 with City of Martinez for gy 1976-77; Supplements Nos. 005 and 006 to Amended License Agreement with International Business Machines, Inc. to enable Data Processing to function on disk drives and under the OS Operating Systen- Letter to State Solid Waste Management Board transmitting November 1976 Draft Contra Costa County Solid Waste management Plan; Contract with R. Sweet, K.D., for professional in-service training for Health Dept. medical staff; Agreement with Tcr-ny C. Angove and Associates for consulting services in connection with preparation of environmental impact report for Sub. 4879, Alamo area; Contract with J. Austin for evaluation of Projects. "Open Space, Community Detention and Pittsburg-Antioch Diversion." Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 76/1039, commending E. Easik who served as Supervisor Linscheidl� secretary for 16 years; 76/1040, as ex officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, fixing Dec. 21 at 11 a.m. to receive bids for wire College Site Improvements - Phase V E VI, Concord; 76/1041, accepting as complete contract with Mountain Construction, Inc. for instal'ration of storr- drainage system In a.-ea of Olive Drive and Eirker Pass Road, Concord; 76;1042, autherisI-ng Chairnan to execute Offer of Dedication to City of Concord of a portion of property along Seth Lane; 76/1043, amending Ices. 76/638 establishing rates to be paid to child care institu- tions; 76/1044, fixing rates for foster home carie; 76/1045, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Yater Conservation District, approved condemnation of certain real property In the Brentwood area required for a public improvement (Lines E and E-1, Marsh Creek); 76/1046, approvIng increase in ground rental and amendment of lease with Navajo Aviation, Inc., for fixed base operation, Buchanan Field Airport; 7f/lOt7, authorizing Chairman to execute consent for sublease of certain property at Buchanan Field Airport to Laron Enterprises, Inc.; 76/1046, establishing Animal Control Center Volunteer Program. Waived reading and fixed Dec. 7 for adoption of ordinance amending the Ordinance Code with respect to Sncreasinr fees and penalties collected for impounded animals. Recessed to meet in Executive Session; and in connection therewith, appointed E. Danielson as Agricultural Comm*.Sasiorer - Director of Weights 6 Measures. Acknowledged receipt and referred to Administration and Finance Committee report of Director, Human Resources Agency, on Social Service funding problems. Referred to Administration and Finance Committee request of Riverview Fire Protection District for approval to acquire su.-•plus state property for construction of central fire station, administration building and training center. Authorized transfer of certain funds from the Park Dedication Trust Fund to CSA R-E for acquisition of property for a neighborhood park, Walnut Creek area. Fixed Dec. 28 at tries indicated for hearinF.s on following Planning Commission initiated rezoning applications: 10. 0 a.m. - 20tt-P.Z, Concord area; O:30 a.F. - 2050-^Z, Antioch area - 2051-RZ, Oakley area; e, 2052-F.Z, Bethel Island area. Approved recems:endation o" ?Tanning Cc-='sSicn to rezone certain land in the San Raison area (2034-PZ) to Retail Business Ztstrict (w-=); waived reading and fixed Dec. 7 for adoption of Ordinance No. 76-89 giving effect to same. 00509 November 30, 1976 Summary, continued ?age 3 Approved recommendation of Planning Caraission to rezone certain land in the Saranap area (2036-RZ) to Retail Business District (R-B); valved reading and fixed Dec. 7 for adoption of Ordinance No. 76-88 giving effect to sane. Referred to Public Storks Director co=laint of G. Sparrowe concerning condition of Livorna Road and Laverock Lane, Alamo area, as a result of recent reconstruction of Livorna Road. Exonerated bond deposited as surety for taxes in connection with Sub. 4843, City of Walnut Creek. Acknowledged receipt of official canvass of votes cast in Nov. 2 election for CSA R-9 Maximum Tax Rate; City-County Thoroughfare System; incorporation of San Ramon Valley; Noraga School District Revenue Limit Increase; and Jail Initiative Measure. Accepted resignation of C. Hillevi as trustee of Reclamation District No. 799. Referred to County Health Officer and Public Works Director (Environmental Control) letter from California Regional Water Quality Control Board--Central valley Region transmitting outline of recommended scope of work for countywide septage study and inviting cor=e=s thereon prior to Dec. 10. Fixed Dec. 21 at 11 a.m. to consider amount of park dedication fee refund to be paid to Albert D. Seeno Construction Company in connection with development of Sub. 4172, San Ramon area. Denied request of S. Calhoun for an evidentiary hearing on General Assistance benefits. Adopted Resolutions 76/1049 through 76/1060 authorizing changes in the assessment roll. Referred to County Administrator comments of L. =lizarde, Economic Opportunity Council Board Member, with respect to membership on CAL-1EVA-CAP Directors and Board Chairmen's Association. Denied appeal of G. Ruckstuhl, Jr., from Board of Appeals approval of Variance Permit Application No. 2043-76, Antioch area, and imposed an additional landscaping condition. 00510 aF The preceding documents consist of 510 pages. 4 6. I,?