Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 09071976 - R 76H IN 3
�I 7976 SEPTEMBER TUESDAY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1976 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ., CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman J. P. Kenny, presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Ruhsell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County; Administrator and Public Works Director. 00001 00{ 01 „4 JAMES P.KENNY.RIC..-ONO CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P KENNY I ST OISTRICT ALFRED M DIAS.EI.SO8Q^NTE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EDMUND A.LINSCHEIO 2ND DISTRICT VICE C,.MAIRNAN JAMES E.MORIARTY.I-AFATETTE AND F� JAMES R.OLSSON.COUNT*CL£II'- 36tO OSTRICT SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD ANO Ea OFFICIO CLERK OF Tr.E BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS,CONCORD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL ATM OCSTRtcr BOARD CMAMBERS.ROOM 207.AONINI$TRATION BIALOING CMIEF CLERK EDMUND A LINSCHEID.PITTSBURG ►D.BO%911 PHONE(415)372.2371 STM DISTRICT MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY SEPTEMBEER 7, 1976 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.X. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board," 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees. 9:45 A.T.. Recess. 10:30 A.M. Hearing on proposed street name change of a portion of r Ashby Way, San Ramon area, to Laguna Place. 10:35 A.N. Hea=i.ng on appeal of Mrs. Linda Moody and Mrs. Sally ging from Planning Commission conditional approval of Final Development Plan No. 3022-76 and tentative map for Subdivi- sion 4878 Diablo/kmville area (Blackhawk Development Co., applicant; and In connection therewith consider letter from Mrs. Linda Moody requesting that her name be withdrawn from the aforesaid appeal. ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 13: CONSENT 1. APPROVE minutes of proceedings for the month of August, 1976= 2. DECLARE certain ordinances duly published. 3. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll. 4. INTRODUCE the following rezoning ordinances, waive reading and fix September 14, 1976 for adoption of same: No. 76-64, 2016-RZ, Alamo area; and No. 76-65, 2011-RZ, Pleasant Hill area. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommenda6io,,Q oA. wue uucu,u, Atu 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees. 9:45 A.T1. Recess. 10:30 A.M. :fearing on proposed street name change of a portion of Ashby Way, San Ramon area, to Laguna Place. 10:35 A.M. Hearing on appeal of Mrs. Linda Moody and Mrs. Sally ging from Planning Commission conditional approval of Final Development Plan No. 3022-76 and tentative map for Subdivi- sion 4878 Diablo/Danville area (Blackhawk Development Co., applicant; and In connection therewith consider letter from Mrs. Linda Noody requesting that her name be withdrawn from the aforesaid appeal. ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 13: CONSENT 1. APPROVE minutes of proceedings for the month of August, 1976. 2. DECLARE certain ordinances duly published. 3. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll. 4. INTRODUCE the following rezoning ordinances, waive reading and fix September 14, 1976 for adoption of same: No. 76-64, 201E-RZ, Alamo area, and No. 76-65, 2011-RZ, Pleasant Hill area. 5. ADOPT ordinances (introduced August 31, 1976) amending the Ordinance Code as follows: a. Allowing transfer of cardroom licenses and raising fees therefor; b. Allowing bingo games in the unincorporated areas of the County; and c. Relating to sale or disposition of impounded animals. 00002 K Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 7, 1976 6. FIX September 28, 1976 at 10:35 a.m. for hearing on Planning Commission recommendation with respect to request of Eddie Biggs (1997-RZ) to rezone land in the E1 Sobrante area. 7. FITC October 5, 1976 at 10:50 a.m. for hearing on Planning Commis- sion recommendation to repeal certain sections of the Ordinance Code pertaining to comparable uses. 8. AUTHORIZE legal defense for persons who have so requested in connection with Superior Court Action No. 155659. 9. DENY the claims of Mildred I. Wade, Elaine Pepare, and Linda Hemmi; and the amended claims of Ruby J. Perez, Raymond Perez, Monique Perez, Lizette Perez, and Sandra Lawton. 10. AUTHORIZE extension of time in which to file final map of Subdivision 4724, Diablo area. 11. ADOPT resolution rescinding Resolution No. 76/738 which authorized consolidation of the City of Richmond's proposed Charter Amend- ment with the November 2, 1976 General Election. 12. ADOPT resolution fixing September 28, 1976 at 11 a.m. as time to receive bids for installation of reflective pavement and markers, Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon area. 13. INTRODUCE ordinance amending the Ordinance Code to prohibit refuse accumulation; waive reading and fix September 14, 1976 for adoption. Items 14 - 19: DE:22PYINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item.) 14. 1'=i`O_W.DUi: from County Administrator pertaining to status of the Mental Health Sub-acute Treatment Facility, which recommends that said program be continued through the fiscal year to provide additional information on the long term results, although no significant reduction in expenditures for the operation of J and I :lards have been experienced as yet because of an increase in patient admissions. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDATION 15. *;-M4ORAP-iDUD1 from Director, Human Resources Agency, advising that Mr. Terry Jones has resigned as a consumer representative on the Joint Powers Health Systems Agency Governing Board and recom- mending that Mrs. Diary Lou Laubscher be appointed to fill the vacancy. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF R ,COMelENDATION 16. A!'40RANDUM from Director of Planning (in response to Board referral) recommending refund of a 5300 park dedication fee paid by Mr. Eric Liske in connection with issuance of a building permit for Parcel No. 357-292-16. APPROVE RECOM=- ATION 17. LETTER from President, San Jose Scientific Co., Inc., requesting that said company be afforded the opportunity to submit a competitive proposal for biomedical services for the County Medical Services. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY 18. LETTER from Subdivision-Supervisor, Title Insurance and Trust, Oakland, transmitting resolution adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors which allows the Clerk of the Board to certify, without further action of the Board, that security requirements have been satisfied for subdivision maps within cities, and suggesting that the county take similar action. REFER TO COUNTY COUNSEL FOR RECOM ENDATION 00003 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 7, 1976 19. LETTER from Mr. Ivan Netter, Imperial Realtors, seeking Board assistance with respect to funding requirement of California Housing Finance Agency that qualified electors must approve construction of a senior citizen apartment project at Bancroft and Ygnacio Valley Roads, Walnut Creek area. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND COUNTY COUNSEL FOR RECOMMENDATION Items 20 - 23: INFORMATION (Copies of communications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 20. LETTER from State Controller relating to payments by the County to the State under the Medi-Cal program; and EXPLANATORY memorandum from County Auditor-Controller pertaining thereto. 21. COMMUNICATION from Chairman, Merced County Board of Supervisors, expressing opposition to the non-immigrant children school tax and urging this Board to take similar action. 22. LETTER from District Director, State Department of Transportation, advising that said Department in conjunction with Contra Costa County and the Cities of Walnut Creek and Pleasant Hill have scheduled a public hearing on September 29, 1976 concerning improvements to local and State roads in the vicinity of the Pleasant Hill Bart Station and Interstate Route 680. 23. MEMOR 0-DUM from Executive Director, County Supervisors Association of California, advising that September 17 is the deadline for submission of resolutions proposing changes in CSAC policy or rules for consideration at the Annual Conference in November. Persons addressing the Board should com Tete the form pro—v—iffe-T on vie rostrum and furnishthe Cleric with a written coav of their vresentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: TUESDAY, 5 P.M. 00004 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions September 7, 1476 From: Arthur G. will, .County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassifications of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To Civil 582 Departmental Collection Services Service Collections Assistant Trainee- Assistant Project Trainee-Project Probation 316 Deputy Deputy Probation_ Probation_ Officer II-Project officer I- Project, #01 II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 2. Name and Destination Department and Date Meeting Robert W. Giese, Des Moines, IA International Building 10-10-76 to 10-16-76 Conference of Inspection Business Officials Kenneth Chrisman, New York, NY & vicinity Out-of-State Audits James Peterson & 10-3-76 to 10-22-76 Jack Shaffer, Assessor III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 3. Moraga Fire Protection District. Add $40,000 from district funds for building construction. IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 4. Authorize County auditor-Controller to initiate legal action in Small Claims Court against Merle Hall to recover $362.57 due Contra Costa County. 00005 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-7-76 Page:. 2. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACF-PIENTS/RATES 5. Home and/or Effective Department Institution Rate Date Human Plumfield, Santa Rosa $1,029 9-8-76 Resources Human Work Training Program, Inc. $812 9-8-76 Resources Santa Barbara Human Lincoln Child Center, $1,590 9-8-76 Resources Oakland VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 6. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Puroose Amount Period JHx and Parking and $6,560 9-7-76 Associates circulation for to Detention Facil- 11-30-76 ity EIR James J. O'Donnel Continued devel $16,570* 8-1-76 Consultant opment of to Occupational 6-30-77 Alcoholism Evaluation and Treatment Program for County employees *(90& State funds) JHK and Traffic study $2,000* 9-1-76 Associates *(reimbursed by to developer) 12-31-76 City of County to provide At cost, Until Richmond geologic services presently terminated $23.93 per hour Contra Costa Promote $128,510 9-1-76 County Devel- economic to opment Assn. development 8-31-77 00006 c To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-7-76 Page: 3. VI. CONTRACTS AND GPk:`TS - continued 7. Acknowledge receipt of a Grant from the Depart-ment of Health, Education and Welfare in the amount of $37,700 to continue the provision of Head Start Services to Handicapped Children. 8. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to sign close-out report for ACTION Grant No. 334-9036 (Upsprout Project) , and authorize the County Auditor-Controller's Office to return unspent federal grant funds of $213.03. VII. LEGISUATION• 9. Establish County position on measures pending before the 1976 Session of the California State Legislature as follows: Bill Number Subject Position AB-3627 Increase in Conciliation Court SUPPORT filing _ees (adopt resolution urging signature by Governor) . VIIII-._�L ESTATE ACTIONS 10. Authorize Public Works Deoartment to negotiate a lease for space in the Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church Parsonage at 169 - 6th Street, Richmond, for use by Brinks, Inc. of San Francisco in conducting a food stamp sales outlet, as recoTmianded by the D—irector, Human Resources Agency. IX. OTHER ACTIONS 11. Approve contract documents submitted by the River-view Fire Protection District for the abatement of weeds, rubbish and other fire hazard conditions within the district for the period November 1, 1976 through October 31, 1977 and advertise for bids to be received on September 28, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. 12. Authorize the Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to a ecute the "Statement That Argument Is True And Correct" for rebuttal arguame_nts to County Measure 3 (Jail Initiative) and C (Road Imp_cve=ent Tax) as required by State law. 00007 To: Board of Supervisors From: Count.` Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-7-76 Page: 4. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 13. Authorize the Director, Human Resources Agency, to issue - competitive bidding :materials to the public for a contract to provide for transportation of mentally retarded adults to sheltered workshops, and fix September 21, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. as the time to receive bids. 14. Authorize Diablo Valley College to utilize space (two evenings per :eek) in the Probation Department Office at 2525 Stanwell Drive, Concord, for the fall semester ending January 25, 1977. 15. Authorize John F. Kennedy, School of Law, use of Courtroom, Department 6, Superior Court, for classroom sessions on selected weekday evenings through September 16, 1976, subject to conditions imposed by Superior Court Administrator. 16. Accept resignations of Ms. E. Frances David and Mrs. Nancv Thacker from the Manpower Planning Council, and appoint Mrs. Mary Erber and Mr. Nike Warren, respectively, to replace theca, as nominated by the Cities of Pittsburg and San Pablo, respectively, and recommended by the Council and the Director, Human Resources Agency. 17. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum from Hum-man Resources Director submitted in response to Board referral and, as recommended therein, approve process for selection of consumer nominees to the Joint Powers Health Systems Agency governing board. 18. approve the selection of the 50 Plus Club (Senior Citizens) of Pittsburg by the Economic Opportunity Council as the organization to fill the Class ill Representative seat on the Economic Opportunity Council vacated by the League of Women Voters. 19. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum from County Administrator transmitting comments on the recommendations of the 1975- 1976 Grand Jury and, as recommended therein, take said comments under advisement for one week for consideration as those of the Board. 20. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to submit letter to ABAG urging allocation of supplemental Emergency Medical Services grant funds in the a.-mount o $40,000 for cardio pulmonary resuscitation training equipment and purchase of ultra high frequency radio equipment. IN U0 To: . Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-7-76. Page: 5. IX. OTHER ACTIONS - continued 21. Status report on implementation of the Public Works employment Act of 1976, P.L. 94-369. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGEYDA T-TEAMS: TUESDAY, 5:00 P.M. 00009 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 7, 1976 E X T R A B U S I N E S S SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 1. ORINDA TRANSIT - JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT - Orinda Area On April 13, 1976, the Board of Supervisors authorized the Public Works Director to proceed with the preparation of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the Town of Moraga to provide for local bus service for the Orinda area. That same Board Order approved the County's share of the cost of operating the system, which is estimated to be $15,000 for the remainder of the 1976-77 fiscal year. The County's contribution is a small part of the total operating cost, estimated to be $76,250. In addition to the operating cost, approximately $163,000 of start-up work, capital purchases - including buses - is anticipated to be expended. All of the start-up and capital costs are paid for by Federal funds and Transportation Development Act funds (State). The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement is to be executed by the Town of Moraga at their next meeting on September 8, 1976. Service will start on September 13, 1976. Advance publicity, press notices, and other marketing efforts are being provided by AC Transit. It is recommended that the Board approve the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and authorize its Chairman to execute the Agreement, con- tingent upon approval by the Town of Moraga. The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement provides for the appointment of a citizens' advisory committee. Three members are to be appointed by the City Council of the Town of Moraga, and two by the Board of Supervisors. In cooperation with the Orinda Association, and upon the nomination by Supervisor Moriarty, it is recommended that the Board appoint Mr. James Lubin, 80 Tara Road, Orinda, and Mr. Alfred Pepin, 26 Fern Way, Orinda, as County members to the citizens'advisory committee. (RE: Work Order 5299-926) (TP) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page--a'hof j September 7, 1976 00410 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 7, 19766 AGENDA Way, urinda, as County members to the citizens"advisory 6mmittee. (RE: Work Order 5299-926) (TP) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page of i September 7, 1976 00010 ........... CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 7, 1976 AGENDA REPORTS None SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. NORTH RICHMOND STREETS - ACCEPT CONTRACT - North Richmond Area The work performed under the contract for pavement reconstruction, asphalt concrete overlay and drainage improvements at various locations in the North Richmond area was completed by the contractor, G. L. Hasenpflug, Inc., of Vallejo, on August 11, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard speci- fications at a contract cost of approximately $56,000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of August 11, 1976. -The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 0565-4285-76 (665)) (C) Item 2. ROLLINGWOOD DRIVE - ACCEPT CONTRACT - San Pablo Area The work performed under the contract for construction of a valley gutter and conform work at the intersection of Fordham Street and Rollingwood Drive, was completed by the contractor, F. D. Marron Company, of Brentwood, on July 26, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $6,100. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of July 26, 1976. The work overran the allotted contract time limit by twelve calendar days. There is no provision in the contract for liquidated damages. (RE: Project No. 1075-4270-76 (665)) (C) Item 3. NORTH RICHMOND BYPASS - ACCEPT GRANT DEED AND RIGHT OF 14AY CONTRACT - Richmond Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the Grant Deed and Right of of Way Contract from James W. Harvey, Trustee, dated August 23, 1976, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the contract on behalf of the County. It is further reconded that the County Auditor be authorized to draw a warrant in the amount of $67,000 payable to Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. MZ-191204, and deliver said warrant to the County Real Property Division for payment. Compensation is for 5.005+ acres of industrially zoned land, including two excess parcels, required for roa3 construction. (RE: Project No. 0572-4345-663-72) (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 4. SUBDIVISION 4427 - APPROVAL - Pleasant Hill Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreernent.for Subdivision 4427. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 5 September 7, 1976 00011 Item 4 Continued: Owner: Marybeth Investors, Limited 1485 Park Avenue, Emeryville, CA 94608 Location: Subdivision 4427 is located on the north side of Reliez Valley Road west of Withers Avenue. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 5. MORAGA WAY - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Orinda-Poraga Area The work performed under the contract for an asphalt concrete overlay on Moraga Way was completed by the contractor, Branaugh Excavating, Inc., of Castro Valley, on August 23, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $86,000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of August 23, 1976. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 0961-4316-76 (661)) (C) Item 6. 1379 EL CURTOLA - APPROVE AGREE14ENT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a Rental Agreement, dated August 17, 1976, with Rodolfo Garza for rental of County-owned property located at 1379 E1 Curtola, Walnut Creek, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. The rental is on a month-to-month, as-is basis, at $225 per month, commencing October 1, 1976. (RE: Work Order 5252-926) (RP) Item 7. SUBDIVISION MS 46-76 - APPROVAL - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision MS 46-76. Owner: D. C. Development and Construction Company 2363 Boulevard Circle, Suite 2, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 Location: Subdivision MS 46-76 is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Danville Highway and Crest Avenue. (LO) Item 8. COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-6 - APPROVE AMENDMENT TO LEASE - Orinda Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute the Amendment to Lease between the County as lessor, and Fountainhead-Montessori Nursery School, lessee, covering additional space require- ments at the Orinda Community Center. The Amendment to Lease amends the lease dated July 1, 1975 previously approved by this Board and provides for a month-to-month rental of $125, commencing August 15,1976. (SAC) A G E N D A Public Works Department 5 SPntarber 7, 1976 00012 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 9. BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Concord Area The work performed under the contract for pavement repair of taxiways at Buchanan Field Airport was completed by the contractor, Heinson Construction Company, of Martinez, on August 20, 1976, in conformance with the approved pians, special provisions and-standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $4,400. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of August 20, 1976. The work was completed within the allotted contract titre limit. (RE: Work Order 4699-76 (927)) (C) Item 10. OLIVE DRIVE STORM DRAIN - ACCEPT RIGHT OF ENTRY - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute a Temporary Right of Entry dated August 26, 1976, from Pacific Gas and Electric Company to Contra Costa County for the Olive Drive Storm Drain Project. (RE: Work Order 8521-925-76) (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 11. CROW CANYON ROAD - INCREASE CONTRACT CONTINGENCY FUND - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve an increase of $5,000 in the contract contingency fund for the Crow Canyon Road Reconstruction project in order to provide for (a) additional cost of removal of an abandoned building; (b) partial reconstruction of the median; and (c) maintenance of the contingency fund to allow for other unforeseen work. Sufficient funds for this increase are available in the current road budget. (RE: Project No. 4711-4329-76 (661)) (C) Item 12. DIABLO ROAD - INCREASE CONTRACT CONTINGENCY FUND - Danville Area It is recoam:ended that the Board of Supervisors approve an increase of $8,000 in the contract contingency fund for the Diablo Road Reconstruction project in order to pro- vide for an unanticipated overrun in the quantity of asphalt concrete and to maintain the contingency fund balance to allow for other unforeseen work. Sufficient funds for this increase are available in the current road budget. (RE: Project No. 4721-4159-74 (661)) (C) Item 13. KIRKER PASS ROAD - RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATIO`l - Concord Area It is recommnded that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Board Chairman to execute a Right of Way Certification to the State Department of Trans- portation that the County has acquired all rights of way required for the installation of the Kirker Pass Median Barrier. (RE: Project No. 5261-4310-663-76) (RP) AG E N D A Public Works Department_gage 3 of 5 September 7, 1976 00013 GENERAL Item 14. BUS STOP SHELTERS - APPROVE AGREEt-EENT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the License Agreement dated August 12, 1976 between the County and Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District which will allow the District to construct and maintain shelters at existing bus stops on County Civic Center property on Pine Street, between Marina Vista and Escobar Street, and on County Flood Control Office property located at 255 Glacier Drive, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Agreement on behalf of the County. The use of the properties is considered as a Class 3 Categorical Exemption to the Environmental Impact Report requirements. (RE: Work Order 5252-926) (RP) Item 15. DETENTION FACILITY - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize its Chairman to execute the Agreement for Architectural Services for the Contra Costa County Detention Facility" with Kaplan/McLaughlin, San Francisco, California. This Agreement replaces the interim Agreement approved July 20, 1976 and provides for the complete design of the new Detention Facility. The fee for basic architectural services specified under this Agreement is $1,099,000. Additional professional services and extra work required in the design process are estimated to be $175,450, as earned. The maximum payment for basic services and necessary additional services and extra work authorized under this Agreement is $1,274,450 without additional written authorization of the Public Works Director. (RE: Work Order 5269-926) (DFP) Item 16. RE-ROOF VARIOUS BUILDINGS AT COUNTY HOSPITAL - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept as complete, as of September 7, 1976, the construction contract with Sparks Roofing Company of Concord for re-roofing of various buildings at the County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, and direct its Clerk to file the appropriate Notice of Completion. It is also recommended that the Board of Supervisors extend the contract time 94 days to the date of acceptance. The major reason for the time extension was to allow the roofing to cure properly prior to installing final reflective coating. (RE: 1120-128-7710-602) (B & G) Item 17. APPORTIONMENT OF FEDERAL-AID SEC03 DARY AND STATE HIGHWAY MATCHING FUNDS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt a Resolution as required by Section 2211 of the Streets and Highways Code notifying the State Highway Engineer that the County: (a) Claims the apportionment of: Source Amount Federal-Aid Secondary Funds $172,14f State Highway Fund money for matching $86,071 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977; and (b) Agrees to provide any County matching funds required, as provided in the Streets and Highways Code, Section 2210.5. (RD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 5 September 7, 1976 00014 f 1, Item 1B. WOMEN'S MINIMUM SECURITY FACILITY - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Richmond Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Consulting Services Agreement with Kister, Savio and Rei, Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, EI-Cerrito, for a survey of the site for the Women's Minimum Security Facility, Brookside Drive, Richmond. This Agreement provides for payment to the Surveyor-in accordance with the Standard Rates, as attached to the Agreement, with a maximum amount of $1,500, not to be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. (RE: 1003-097-7711-608) (B & G) Item 19. APPARATUS REPAIR SHOP - RELOCATE PROJECT SITE/APPROVE AGREEMENT - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, approve the following: 1. The relocation of the Apparatus Repair Shop project site from Boyd Road, Pleasant Hill to the Fire College site, Treat Boulevard, Concord, as requested by Fire Chief Streuli, and recomrended by the Fire Commissioners, to provide a more centralized location. 2. A Consulting Services Agreement with Frank P. Bellecci, Land Surveyor, Concord, for a survey of the Treat Boulevard site for the Apparatus Repair Shop, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Agreement which provides for payment to the Surveyor in accordance with the standard rates as attached to the Agreement, with a maximum amount of $500, not to be exceeded without further written authorization by the Public Works Director. (RE: 2025-2025-7710-603) (B & G) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N D A Public Works Department Tage SoT 5 September 7, 1976 00015 i Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time). 00016 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , i9 76 In the Matter of Proceedings of the Board during the month of August, 1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the reading of the minutes of proceedings of the Board for the month of August, 1976 is waived, and said minutes of proccedings are approved as written. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervhors affixed this 7thdoy of September 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk t �r CSR , Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-2431761Sm (� 0001"I -loom" In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 76 ' 19 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County and was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORDERS that said ordinances(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law. Ordinance Number Subiect Newspaper 76-67 Allowing transfer of cardroom Contra Costa Times licenses and raising fees therefor PASSED on September 7, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NO ABSENT J. P. Kenny ) A. id. Dias ) J. E. Moriarty ) W. N. Boggess E. A. Linscheid ( (X� ( ) 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of .Supervisors affixed this 7th day of September. 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By . Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - 15 1 j xine M. 'Uptf kd 00018 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 ,i9 In the Matter of . Affidavits of Publication of Ordinances. - This Board having heretofore adopted Ordinances Nos. 76-49, 76-54 through 76-59, and 76-61 throueh 76-63 and Affidavits of Publication of each of said ordinances having been filed with the.'Clerk; and it appearing from said affidavits that said ordinances were duly and regularly published for the time and in the manner required by law; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said ordinances are hereby declared duly published. The foregoing order was passed by unanimous vote of the members present. , .I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct cope of an order es to on the' minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Wdriees my hand and the Sed of the Board of superwims affixed 7th day of September lg 76 J. R,., OLSSON,,Clerk y ��� �/i ,,,, C�1tlJ DeputyUerk A 24 i2n4 . ism eRonda Amdahl . -Form 130 4/7/75 00019 f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . l9 76 in the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board OARS that said ordinance(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law.- Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 76-66 relating to sale or CONCORD DAILY -- disposition of impounded TRANSCRIPT animals PASSED on September 7, 1476 by the following vote of the Board. Supervisors AYES NOES ABSENT J. B. Kenny ( x) ( ) ( ) A. M. Dias (x) J. E. Moriarty (g W. N. Boggess ( } ( x . E. A. z inscheid {x) 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7TH day of September 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B '-� - �} Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 -"15•W Ronda Amdahl 00020 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUN-1r, CALIFORNIA Re: Zoning Ordinances Introduced Date: September 7, 1976 The Board having held hearing on the Planning Co=rission's recon;nendation(s) on the following rezoning application(s), and directed preparation of the following ordinances) to effect This (these) ordinance(s) was (were) introduced today,' the Board by unanimous vote waiving the full reading thereof and setting September 14, 1976 for Board consideration of passing same: Ordinance Application Number Applicant Number Area 76-64 George Martinovich 2016-RZ Alamo 76-65 Paul Seto 2011-RZ Pleasant Hill PASSED on Cpntt+,nhnr 7, 1976 by the following ;,ets_ AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, and J. P. Kenny NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor H. N. Boggess I HEF.EBY CERfiUY that the foregoitig is a true and correct record and copy of, action duly taken by this Board .on the above date- ATTEST: J_ R_ OLSSOIT, Cou—,Ity Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board: on September 7, 1976 t -1 -ter` Q Depixt f o a Amdahl 00021 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Couniy,• State of California SajltaMbar 7 . 14 _' Y _ r to the Matter of Ordinance(s) Introduced. The following ordinance(s) which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra. Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board bS unaniuous vote of the members present Naives •ful). xeading thereof and fixes September 14, I7e as the time for _ adoption of same: - Amending Ordinance Code Section 416-14.004 relating to refuse accumulation to include a pxohibition. against animal. excrement.. - PASSED by the Board on _ September 7, 1976 1 hereby certify trial the foresdsng is a true and correct copy of an order ettered on tns- minu;es of said Board of Supervisors on trie dwe aforesaid. cc• Courty Administrator Witness my hand and the Sea, of trio Board OF Supervisors adze- this 7th day of SeStember I9 76 J. R. OLSS01 Clerk `` j / Sy Ilk 1 11u GI!-Z-L� Deputy CferL H s- 12174 :15-re Felin C. Tiarshall 00022 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervisors affixed this 7th day of September , 19 76 (� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L`� Vl-k - Deputy Clerk Dorothyffnadvonald H•24 3/7615m 00023 E POS I T I0N ADJUSTMENT REQUEST t1o: Department County Counsel Budget Unit ojo Date 8/20176 Action Requested: Create one project position for typist-clerk forthe period 8-25-76 through 2-28-77 Proposed effective date:8-25-76 Explain wfty adjustment is needed: clerical help needed because of increased vorkload Estimated cost of adjustment: Cou Amount: •_ I. Salaries and wages: vS 1 2. FiSed,�Bsets: (ti.st Ztemb and coat) s7a Estimated to33-- �t Signature `�-- Z Dep tment Head Initial Determination of County Administrato Date: .T„ � � ,�/ C�.3S.TiJ tC� 1� ���� .psi-.1, /t s+ � // r Count Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: -e September 1, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify l Typist Clerk-Project. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Typist Clerk-Project. Can be effective August 25, 1976. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Typist Clerk-Project, Salary Level 178 (634-771). 7 Z".4, Assistant Personnel,,Drrector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: September 8, 1()7r, Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective September 7, 1976. t 1: Count dministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment ;,PPROVED (L,�;:a.�::..""".. on $4� t i '?6 i J f? t1r ccn.r _ ;x County Clerk Date: S E r 7 19? By: Mary CeOT9 epu1YJ4�Je-rk APPROVAL a5 -thl s adjustrent const.itutea an App2oo4ia.ti.on Adjub-tment and Pea,aonneC Rtscfa ion Arrendirent. Oona -,4+ ho rr inl P+pr{ X,� + i; { P 0 S I T ! O.I+ A D J U.S-T,PIc'h;T R E 0 U E S T No: ' ,51 Department Civil Service Mdgi 0init 582 Date 8/26/76 I Action Requested: Retitle Departmental-'Coltections Assistant Trainee-Project to Collection Services Assistant Trainee-Project and reallocate all Proposed effective date: ASAP positions and persons. Explain why adjustment is needed: To bring the title into alignment with the new Collections + Serviced Assistant class series. fcstimated' cost7of ;�justment: Contra CGSia County Amount: I. Salaries--and--wages: RECEIVED $ 2. fixed Assets: (.U4t items turd c.9st) A r,U.,r ,_. =-i3 b Ottio- of $ County Administrator Estimated total ! Signature ,/ -.4", Ifor Department,. ea Initial Determination of County Administrator ' Date: August 30, 1.976,E To Civil. Service: \jT Request recommendation. Count minlstrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: AupYsb 31, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate class and all positions of "Departmental Collections Assistant Trainee-Project to Collection Ser-vices Assistant Trainee-Project. Study discloses duties and responsibilities are appropriate to the class of Collection oersices r.ssistant Trainee-Project. Can be effective day folk.-rig Board action. The above action can be accomialish-gid by mmending Resolution 76/62 and 71/17 to reflect the re`.it�i n- and reallocation of class and positions of Departmental Collections Assistant Trainee-Froject to Collection Sen-ices Assistant Traine-e-Project, both at Salary Level 208 {6? 5). Personnel Divt'ctor Recommendation of County Administrator Date: September 8, 1976 j Recommendation of Personnel office and/or Civil Service f Commission approved, effective September 8, 1976. County &M. 1-strator f iAction of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on S-R-1 }n,,� J. R. OLSSO;,County Clerk Date: SE_? i By: 4 C -+mac Mary q epvaerk r . APPROVAL o' this adjustment ectLstitt�tes arc Ap�vcopticztiv►t Adjustment turd Pelr�sofz�c� tl'G► Resotution, Ameouhnent. V i POSIT1ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department PROBATION Budget Unit 316 Date August 19, 1976 Action Requested: Reclassify Deputy Probation Officer I-Project, position-783-01 (Simon Vasquez) to Deputy Probation Officer II-Project Proposed effective date: 9_/1/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: S. Vasquez is on leave of absence from permanent D.P.O. I position, which noir is flexibly staffed, I to I1. Rec assification needed to give S. Vasquez comparable status. This action suggested by H. Cisterman. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1. Salarips and wages: $ 2. Fixed assefi: (ti.s.t Ztc►ns and eostl - o Estimated total Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator , 1 Date/: To Civil Service: _(Coun-tv IRequest recommendation. l I/ �.1 /1 7-wu Admt nt'strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Au;ust 31, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation 'Reclassify 1 Lhaputy Probation Officer I-Project to Deputy Probation Officer IT_-Project. Stud;; discloses duties and responsibilities noir bein- performed justify reclassification to iepaty Probation Officer II-Project. Can be effective day fo11o:•ring Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending ?L-solution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Do-vaty Probation Officer I-Project, position h0l, Salary Level 325 (993-1207) to Deputy Probation Officer Il=rroject, Salary Level 395 (1229-14194). Assist int Personnel Di, ector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: September 8, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective September 8, 1976. County Administrator ` Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPRC` o ;mss) on SEP 1976 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: JLi' i i�'t By: l,;crj C./f D 26Y'-C1e�k AP nnOVAL o6 t: s adjustment ccns.ti,tutes a►: A.pp tupuation AdjELStme►Lt cued Pe�Qg{0►� Rezcu u,tivn Amc-ndment. 111{}, ,s NnTP- Tin cnrtinn I cifin nfIfnrr irlp�t be completed and cunnlP,pnt-ad v-han In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustment attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, • are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7th day of_September 19 76 (� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �! Deputy Clerk Dorothy a Donald H-24 3/76 15m 00027 j CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT I 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 1 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Horaga Fire Protection District ► +d Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase I Je Ouantit 1 BudoetUno Ob ect Sub Acc+. CR X IN 66) 01 2010 2010-9970 For Bldg. Construction 40,000 01 2010 2010-7711 008 Building Construction 40,000 ! I I 1 1 1 c Contra Cosa County RECEIVED i AUG -16 i976 � Office of County Administrator r PROOF _Comp•-_ K_P_- _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(11 capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To transfer allocation from Reserve for Contingency Date Descriptionto provide for building construction. ` f As above Approved by Fire Commission August 3, 1976 j t •'PROVED: RES TE AUDITOR– CONTROLLER ��— t -7 COUNTY / 6 ADMINISTRATOR: OARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES:SaPertiyeom Icenny. Dias. _V JMWWS L.imc ei3.�r SEP 7 1976ass"', on 28 CLERK byS. - L J. R O )-AkA At&!AA S?,h j �RISSON ary' l9 Signature Title Date �P�y Clerk A°Journ l No. 157el M 129 Rev.2/68) • tee fastntetione an Rrverse Side A 1':1iFill Rtr'COR 11 ilt R;7iwZii 1:�-'i t:•tl.:T1 Ln Ti�Ctti.._= (Lw• (ti..•,. , `1•'0 Cl,jaii; EX.RD OF ` at o'clock SUI'i:i;1'TSOi2S Contra Cost-aCourt,, Recordz .7. R. OLSSON, County Recorder Fee S Official BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA .COUNTY, CALIFOR.:I:c In the Nater of Accept and Gi:•inr, ) P.�SOLU:IOii Or :.CCE--r:ttCE Notice of Complction of Contract witli ) and I:OTIC E 0 �• CO :FLF_IO1F G. L. Hasenpflug, Inc. (C.C. §§30306, 3093) Project No. 0565-4285-76 (665) RESOLUT^107: NO. JL% 80 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLti'".c.S MAT. - The County o; Contra Costa on June 14, 1976, contracted -with G. L. Hasenpflug, Inc. 5 Broadway, Vallejo, CA 94596 Vame and Address of Contractor) for pavement reconstruction, asphalt concrete overlay and drainaSe improvements at various locations in the North Richmond area, Project. No. 0565-4285-76 (665), ,with American Fidelity Fire.Insurance Company as surety, 1;.e of BondinG Co :pa_ny) for to be performed on the Grounds of the County; and The Publi r: :•lor'•:s Director reports that said work has been insgeated and complies w uh the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recti! .ends its acceptance as complete as of August 11 , 1976 Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and thre Clerk shall file with thle Coi aty Recorder a cosy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Com.plettion for -said contract- PASSED ontract_P 1SSED AND A'DOPT%D 011 Septer.•ber 7, 1976 CEftiIl'ICATIO?1 and VE t IFICATTON I certify 1-hat ':.i::: Ore_-oin9- is a true and correct copf of a rc'solu- tio:l and acce-ptance duly adonted and cr-tcred on t^e r_ nutc:s of this hoard's meet'_ on tho above date. I declare t:.rdcr penalty of perjury that t::c forc:7oinr- is true and correct. Dat-00* Senter..ber 1976 J. It. OLSSO , Coi.Lnl;; ler'. & a lig r i3I:^' 112 U::1'_i C�_ officio Clerk Of the Board _.., L'y_ Jean L. Miller Originator: Public Works Departmnt - Construction•-Division Awl-i•Lor 00029 $;1Pi:i;t'1SOi:S Contra Court Record= J. R. OLSSO:., County Recorder • Fee - S Official MARD 0'r' SU2 -1V1SORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Ci►Lilr¢RI:IA in t}i_. I:wA.:_ of ACcclitiner. and Giving, ) PWSOLJsIO.. 0; nCCE2' ::,CE }'%.).Uce of Completion of Contract, with ) ind NOTICE OF ComPLETim." F. D. Harron Co. (C.C. 03O86, 3O93) Project No. 1075-4270-76 (665) � RESOI,U I0i: 110. _76/781 . The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County A SOLVES _}Tr::The County of Contra Costa or. Jure 1, 1916, contracted -with F. D. Marron Co. ,ou e 1, Box B, Brentwood, CA 4 3 _ flame and Addracs of Co::tractor) fm- construction of a valley gutter and conforid work at the intersection of Rollin wood Drive and Fordhas! Street in the San Pablo area, Project Ivo. 107.5-4270-75 (665)• t'��i�iK xxaoncxx�a�i�gX, . VIM== X)=Zxw for t:or1: to be performed On the Cro*-nas o: z::c Cownty; and • she Publie :nor?::: Dzrector revarlEs that Sald :ori. bas been inspected and Complies with the approved plans, special pro-visions, and standard ;j1CCifiC: Uions, and recommends its ?.Ca^apta.nce as co;-.- L as of July 26, 1976 � sp Therefore, said work is accepted as completed On said date, and the Clark shall file with the Coital ty Recorder a copy of•this P.esoi utio.n and potice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract- W.SSEJ AN,D AD'Di'�£D Oct September 7, 1976 CBR^:Ii'T.^ATIO3i and ti ERI_ICaln1Cil +• • ::+ +. +' i' rr s a + I correct+ of CSC! u— 7 Certify i. � _:!t s orr_;a :!� is � true .�... orris� cony a r 1 and .: 4. 3 - 'r +�. � M i%.V nor.::t::r• i1G:: a-`.:t itCCti:1:i. 4:21., i:u.1�1iL`(: bt1 C'::S. ,i G W... v Cj ,^�$ 11-un- rd's .y�a'4i?•`_; on t.!c allove elalt `. I dvclare i`idur re n-Alty of }1L -�12. 1 `?�.' a.::C iCri•[Gil�= !t. is i.►'i:e ^.C1. C:U=ra';►.t. . I::ii:' • Sentcirbap 7:..19(1'.- ._._ J. }t. _OL`:rMan" Cownty C!er.. & :. i.:•.a.11i`.:, (.� 2IU::rl:i= t: o{2lclo Cienk Of Ihe Board Originator: Public [brks Departs-ant_ Construetiod Division_ (ont 1 ac tur 76/781 00030 IIS' T111: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COWRA COSTA COU\7Y, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Map of Subdivision 4427, ) ^lcasant Hill Area ) RESOLUTION' NO. 76/782 The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: A cap entitled Subdivision 4427, property located in the Pleasant !till area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Marybeth Investors, Limited, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; Said documents were accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. 59SS929) issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland with Marybeth Investors, Limited as principal, in the amount of $75,200 for Faithful Performance and $78,700 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 139322, dated August 31, 1976), in the amount of $500, deposited by: Marybeth Investors, Limited. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1976-77 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March 1976, is estimated to be $5,000.00; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond (No. 8993425) issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland with Marybeth Investors, Limited as principal, in the amount of $5,000.00 guaranteeing the payment of the estimated 1976-77 tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or casements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public forks Director-BFS Public !Yorks Director-LD County Treasurer-Tax Collector Director of Planning Marybeth Investors, Limited 14SS Park Avenue Emeryville, Calif 9160S -........ ..lr. .._.. 6. • .�111.1�t I'1 Cllit.• !\�1\I 1''Ii..`I 4427 (R. li 11. Code §311611-1:) (§1) Subdividcr: Atarybeth Investors, Ltd. (M) -L•ffcctitc Date: (§I) Cor..p}ction Period: one year (§-I) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 R. (bonds, etc.)' 1. (faithful perforr..ance 6 maintenance) S78,200.00 2. (labor 4 r-atcrials)S78,700_00 1. PAR11 ES 6 PATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the atovenartcd Subdivider, mutually promise: and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. I1.1F'ROl'C_1£\'I'S. Subdivider shall construct, install and conplete road and - street irt;:rovementr, tract dr--ina :, street sij;rs fire hydrants, and all i,r,.provc-ents as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, and including future . -end-inerts, and all inprovertents required in the crproved improvw.ent plan of this subdivision oil file in the Ceunty's Public l•'brls N-vartirent. Subdivider shall cerplete this work anc inprovements (hereinafter called "work") within the above completion period from date !:ere•.: a= required by the California - Subdivision 'lap Act (Business S rrofessions Cede =311500 and following), in a good work- nattlike manner, in accordance ::ith accepted practicesar.:'' in a earner equal or superior to the requirements of tite County 0rd:r.znce Corte and rulirgs rade thereunder;. and where there is a conflict bets:een the ir.,proverent plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requitenents shall govern. +. GUAR_WILE L i•1AVJifX.VXE. Subdivider guarantees that the uorf: is anti will be free from defects and-%:ill perform satisfactorily in accordance t:itl: Article 91-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; and he shall r..a:r::a?r. it for one year after its co-mpletion and acceptance against any defective worknan.-hip or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMPROV E'•iL':T SL•CUPI rY: b}irOSIT 5 5:':EtS. Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business 6 Professie::s Code §11612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: SS00 cash; and.... R. Ronds, etc.: fl - faithf tl performance F, maintenance) additional security for at least tite above-srecified arour:t, which is the total estirated cost of the uork lc•r-s $SOO, in tate fore: of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or ail acceptable corporate surety bored, guaranteeing 'r.is faithful performance of this agreement and naintenance of the cork for one year after cc.-.Diction and acceptance thdreof against any defective worl.ranship or r..aterials or any unsatisfactory perfornnnce; plus (2- labor 6 materials) another such additional security in at least Lite above-specific. amount, which is the full amount of said esth"rited cost, securing payrtei,t to the contractor, to his subcontractors, nrd to per-zons renting equiprcrt or furnishing labor or rntcrinls to then or to the Subdivider. 5, tiAVRAXTY. Subdivider warrants that said irprovement pinn is atlequatc tb accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any tire before the County's resolution of completion for tits subdivision, the ir..r:ovenen: plan proves to be iradequate in any respect. Subdivider stall naive changes necessary- to accomplish the wo. as promised. - 1 - Microfi(tt►ed with bwld wdor 000 6. No h'AIt'i:l! !:1' Ctill '1'. Inspection of tltc ktrtk and/or catcriais, or approval of work wreck/or materials i:ts},ected, or stater:,etrt by any officer, af:nt or employee of i tite Cou,ry indicating the work or any part ther•cof conpiics with the require:cats of this Agrecncl:i, ae acceptance of the whole or arty j1rtrt of saiet t:orl. anti/or n.serials, or Payr ^nts therefor, ar any coMbination or all of [wi Of se acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider Ills obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall tite Count;• be thereby esiopped from bringing any action for damages arising from tile failure to coml any of the terms and conditions hereof. py with 7• 1NnC _ Subdivider shall hold harmless and inder-nifv the irdcr..nitees the t:nrk 10$s $500, in the fnrrt of a cash uepesit, a it :il2tt[ t„ tans ..s acceptable corporate Surety bond, guararttecittg his faithful d acc rails of this agreement. erfornanve; plus (2- labor and maintenance of the c,rkorfrratcriaisaoraan ru:5,tisfaetictory perfortarcu thereof against any defective i.o:.....an. F i�:ieitt to tine contractor, to £, materials) another such ac?tlitinnai security is' at Feast the ai,ove-sped let amour , which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing F. '. ar:d to 1�cr�ozis renting equir.-eta or furnishitig tabor or ratcriais his subcontractors, al*dvtdcr. to then or to tilt S, tiAl'k:ttTY. Sul,livider wnrrants'tltatds id i panvcorse beforelan stheeCountttb accomplish th's s t as prom sed in Scct io.t -, lan ves to adequate resolution of completion rsi :a o11re 1 nakeicl.arges necessaryttotacclomplishotlie 3:t�rl:easnproaised. in any respect. Sul,div ide - I - AAitcofiltttad wittn boat ardas 00032 7. G. No t:Alutt r-Y i.'t?11ay. inspection of the work and/or caterials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or gtaterrent by any officer, ag^rt: or employee of the Goth:.y indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the reruirere:its of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payr:cnts therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescriI*ed; nor shall tire Count_- be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from tire failure to co^ply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. _ 7. INDVIr11TY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indewnify the ircter..nitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The iudc:niters benefited and protected by this grozise are tite County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, cotrmissiors, officers, agents and employees. . R. The liabilities protected against arc any liability or claire for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened-because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse cerderration, or any combination of these, and regardless of Phether or not such liability-, ciain or daiage was unforeseeable at an} time before the County approved the i=^ro:•eceni plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceedings) concerning these. C., .The actions causing liability are arty act or o.ru sicn. f.reOigent or non-negligent) in connection with t lie matters covered by this karceren: a--` attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or e::STeyee of one or more of theta. d. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in t^:s sectio,: is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indeenitre has pre7a.e!, sz pl:ed, or approved atry plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this •Aer:'sr subli:•ision, or has insurance or other isidemnification covering any of these ca:tern, a: : az the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful miscor.euc: ,. art• Indemnitee. 8. COSCS. Subdivider shall pay when due, Al the costs of the :seri:, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required there`;. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey rar=crts ::: accordance with the filed r:ap and to the satisfaction of the Counts Road Co..w.issierer-Surreyor. 10. NO.Nl1LRFOPMIICE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to sort fete the work and improvements within tine time sl!ecificd in this Agreement or extersicns granted, County may proceed to complete thea by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider stall pay the costs and charges therefor irwi;diatelt upon demand. If County sues to cc:-.-:el performance of this Agreement or recover tite cost of completing the irproverents, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 11. ASSIGNMENT. if before County accepts these inprovener.:s, he subdivision is annexed to a city, the County play assiF;n to that cit} the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. - 2 - 00033 r r . I2. ITCOMI M41'. In consideration h^reof, County shal l allot, Subdivider to file and record thr Final &%Llp or Parcel flip for said Subtl i 1,is i on. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) .Vernon L. Cline, Public Rorks Director Marybeth Investors, Ltd., a limited par ers ip By D putt' (Il gelate official capacity ir. titnhe business) �sit►s...�1'��w� RECO`ZIEADED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknot.- ledgincttt for,: below; and if a corporation, affix corporate seal. ` A•'S Stant Public Works Director (CORPOMWE SEAL) FOIL`•1 APPROVED: JOHN' B. CLf'11jSE,,,, County Counsel By Deputy _ U State of California ) ss (Acknov-1edgrlent by Corporation, Partnership, County of ) or Individual) On the person(s) whose name(s) is!are signed above for Sub ividcr wid vho is are known to ae to be the individual(s) and officer(s) or partner(s) as stated above who signed this instrulaerlt, per appeared before ne and acknowledged to ne that he exerttrnrl it -,,,.1 ri, ♦ .t-- _---_--..-_ STATE OF CAUFORNIA }SS COUNTY OF Contra Costa O\•.......Att;,Us.t_..27.........-............__-----.-------.__--___—.__,19__7.6,before me,the undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared C••t:utau{}plv•i: .•... ..7=et n.::n}::nt.n,tcrJ known to me to be one of the partners of the partnership that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. t _ ^ rotary's Signahtte_�� � L! /lames PARTNERSHIP AC ICNOWLEDGMENT 00034 Form Ko.17 ALFRED P.LOfi=� _ Assistant Coi:t7 Tr.ost:ser- r_UWRF-D W.LCAL - Taz Coi:ectar Count,,-r'—suint-Tax Ce-ewer S OFFICE - TAY CCLLEC'LO[C� Fustastnncent o!Taxes CONTRA COSTA COUNTY D.on the Tth..r = . at'!)"'oC D.camSar Fiizt:'tat:L'neat o!Tsaea —--———————_--- Due ord PoYable - .t.njjNv:,r CALIFOW41A T. ,torment at Taxes ab mate(! al-OVC 21110 signed this Sn�trtir,.ent, personals}- appeared before ne and acknoidednetl to see that he expritrod it -,+..t +a « «s... ..,,,.____.. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS COUNTY OF Contra Costa 4N----...Agus-t_27........---.--........__.�.._.__......_ ...»__..._,29. 6,before me,the undTer�siauted,,a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared .. - ..t C'..... ... -johs1.lir_1.tA:ekecaT....................«-............»..........«..»............_......-..........-....................... LJ j ..........»............................................. «. ......».....-..»«»-.......»..»... ...........-.» known to me to be one of the partners of the partnership that executed the within crsaauetusn. .,e++arm:a+n+utcrl instrument,and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same. I`otarys Signature.--.��1 �C-.ez_/I�•�..•_ PARiNERSNiPAC1q+iOWtFLGMENf 00034 tbem Ko.li _ J Ayr xca p.tau=s.at Aisiitxtt Casaty Treasi:s.t- i Tau Cauactar GauaV Traaxuxt-Tax wal!eet¢c OWS OFFICE Z'A.X CGLLCL( S?sst;astnitGeat of Texas CON g eosrA caL n•una+�.nt an tb:TeaL"t'-2aY at D.eeaalar r;ext;z:t»t:aent at T-Si[a .�... - qua cnd Poyahta \EZ.CALIFOF.4IA oa tn.t'ir�:t Day at tior.aa.t HIAP,'TL Cat-2365 5.cond t.'tstntia.nt at Taxas ... pnm.226'-1�. Deiin4atat --- - on the Tenth My of ADti1 $,tend L'txtatta+at of Tax.x '1 Clj Uv.and Fayat+te Tune an th.First Day at rrt—" - IF 'IRIS T?.itCT IS TbCT FII:. BY O 0=1132, VOID 19?b s Teas ti^ t I )Srve examined the reap of the proposed This r.r,1 ce�tS.fY , Thb;l3.is;c>a en*litied: t 0. 1:?.2? (1.4fa-ette area) „� the official tax records b t there in are o end IA- a deter�.-_d frac awed on the property ludair d. ate unpaid Co--ty taxes 1975--7oz:� ?len has beer_ paid in full. the rap. tir.. _______r---'n y�nich becare a lien on the firstof 'r.a� of the Jar,( -77 UM __.. , ?arch, 1976 ,%sas b Srt3���--" Tax Collector it !.� , RECEIVED dl f' SEP ,a 2376 J. 2. Ct55ONI g tk SUPf„+VeSoAs C T 6zvur 00035 FtAi:rofilmad u.ith board order +is X50.00 Der annum TAX B011D fQ+01d ALL 11Ei. BY THESE 1'iLESEf:[S: ✓a'z:: Laa>A CU3tA co. That we, Mar beth Investors, Ltd. , a lin ilk-pastn�rshig -Da"' as principal, and Fidelity and Deposit Comp ny o -Maryland a corporation organized and existing under the lags ry of the State of alaad - as surety, are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra Costa State of California, in the stns of Five Thousand and No 100ths Dollars ($ 5.000.00 ), lawful money of the United States of Imerices, for the payment of t:hich sum tell and truly to be made to said County of Contra Costa he and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, •successors - and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. SEALED with our seals and dated this 30th day of August 1976. The condition of the above obligation is such that wh��GGr 1s the above bounden principal is about to file a map entitled, Tract NO. 4�c2 , which shall be a subdivision of a tract of land in said County of Contra Costa , and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected as taxes against the tract of land covered by said nap. The taxes and special assessments collected as taxes are not as yet due or payable. 1;ot+•, therefore, if the said principal shall pay all of the taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien against said tract of land covered by said map at the time of the filing of said map, then this obligation shall be void and of no effect. Otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. PRII'CIPAL:t-iarybeth Investors, Ltd. SURETY: ITY ANDDEPOSIT COieANY OF MARYLAND G�.... J Er on even is ALLorney- n-Fact STATE OF CALIFORNIA l }ss: Qrx AND Corxrti OF S+.x Ftu�tssco J On 30th__ �Lry of__��_g ----••-- �.19 76,before me . 7 _. ,a Notary Public,in and for the City and County and State aforesh commissioned Delventhal aid•duh and sworn.personally appeared ._..�.._---_..__ __--.------.-subscribed ...____..--._.__..._._.._ known to me to be the Person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as the Att rney—n•Fact of the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland,and acknowledged to me that he subxnbed the name of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland thereto as Surety and his own name as Attorney-in Fact. OiFiCI:1l SEAL 1 • ? t LEE ffOGLf;. Dowry.Eo lie is and for the Stat of Cali res, ��• .? NOTARY PUBLIC-LALIFORNIA City and County of San Franci. — IIR fl,.,13 ` COUN fY OF SAI FRA\CISCO 14 t1 ?:�• ,r C.,a 31. 1930 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ISS COUNTY OFContra Costa J . .................... —-- 19.-74,brfore ane,the J undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said County and State per_-onally appeared Joint: Hallenbeck known to me to be one of the par tr-ers of the partnership that executed the within instrument,and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed t.`:e s2*>rr. - - .. Notary's Signature.: ._... .. �C�1�---___-`-- ....... PAR7V ERSHIP AGYNO W LFOGMENt Foran N.IT Microfilmed miitn bcarci end r I 00036 e gr c arge or this oad is 1,181.00 for the term thereof. 59SSi929 E D• It•11'iiClvl:i'il:lt'1' ..^,!:(:1!111"1 II[1i n � '� • : J !J ilC: .l:l:f - FOR anti']V f.: (+ (Performance, Guarantee, al� ;i'3nY,Fis`Jk ,rc� (Calif. Government Code 9-Wi(!1J�c1�;r.1. 3 ` Y✓ �Jpe 1 . OPLI[ATIOii. Marybeth Investors, Ltd. . a limited partnership as Princii+a:l; t+:l:iF�deri`-t and-bepo�tCompany of ryTffld a cor•nornt.ion orrani::srd and epi:tliq- tinder thp. 1.1'es tit' the S aLe cel' Hary1aad____�^__ and withortzed to transact wir•ety bu^trte:;s it, California, a:; Surety, lncr�:1�; jointlyand : cL'CI•a.11,: bindOI:I'SCl':e:, 011!• heirs, executors, adrOnnist rat•era, ;uccessor n, and as.inns to the: Caunty of Contra Costa, California, to nav it: (A. Performance & Guarantee) Seventy.;-Eight Thousand Two Hundred And No/100 *** Dol.lars ($ 78.200.00 ) for ltself or ally cit;-asnirnee under the Belo::-county ;,ut�cliviS:ol: aTreene:�t, plus (1t. PaylnenL) Seventy-Eight Thousand Seven Hundred and Ko/100 Inollars (Z78 700.00 ) to secure the chin:s :.o is:iicll rice nide Irl 'iitle l-.. etc a c:ic: i1*� .:iLil Sec:t.ton 3082) of fart 11 of Uivislon 3 of tine Civil Gocie of t::c ;tate of Califor- nia. 2. REXII'Al..OF SU-1l%IYl:ION .". ti'VEMEtii. The Pt•ineir•.;l• !las esecuLed an :t(:r•ecrrri:t it 0i E'7tie (:�urni. Lo it s,_ if alit! pay for strert, drain:u;:e, and other itrr.reventents in• Suttcllvision '.iumi-el• 4427 , az specif'led ;n the Sut_dIvIsirn1 Arrecinent, rod to co:noletc sr: d nor%w'Ithin the time :,Le•eil'1ccl for corn-let-Jon ill the 411:-11vinion Arr•ecment, al: In ::neer Janne it:i1 SL::Le turd local laws and r•ulinc-:: the*reundcr in or+vr to :,a; i;f concliLionn for filing of the Flnal Nap or Parc=el Nap for sald Subtilvislon. 3. C:ON01'Clnll. A. 'fine contiltioti of ttti:: obligation a:: to SecCinn 1.•;A) a:ofe in such that if t@:e alio e bout!deJ principal , htz or !'us ;)ell,:;, eiecutarz, actnini:t•rators, successor: or assif:ns, shall .l.n all thlrlr sLarid L-i ;,nd abide by, and well and truly keep and Perfo+•nt t!ie cow-rlants, cotlrittinns and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration tcnereef ther•eJn prnvided, on his or its part, to lie kept and rerformcd !. the.. tlmrr atial in tine rlanner thert-In specified, and in all r•eapects accordilig to tileU. tri Intent and imallint-,, andel shall Indrmnif;: and save i:a r:11mr; the County of Contra Co^ta (or city asslrnee) . its o!'ficerz, .^!I- rtts .111.1 employees, as therein st:.il+ulated, then this obliratioll :.trail Ile::Camt- 111111 and void; other t.lse it sha! 1 i=e nand r•erlatln in ftt.i l force and effect. As a mart of Uie oh1ll-at.1en secured lterel•;: and it! :-tictitioln to the face ntro11:1t norell'iett thei•cfrr, th-r!rc' :--hall be lticittcl•.-ct cost:: an i reason- able exprivi.e .linty I'ves , l:tc:lucllnf: rea zori:tt•1:: itttcli nvy's flea:,, itictirred by Ceunt;: (cin• city an signee) in :.11cccssftlll� enforcing; succi of+lif;.1tion, all to lie taxed as costn. and included in all. juditme:lt rendered. ii. The corlclition of this ohi!g;atton a: to :acct ion 1.(l{) atlove Js such :haat said 111-1ticiral and the unders-3-1-tied as corporate rur•et•: are —1d firmly bound unto the Count;; of Contra Costa :and all contractor:., . ::ilcrtlLr:l^t.o:•:, .].boreal•::, natr.r•'_nlircri and other per sons employed in tyre i�::rform-11ce Of the :...forr•::aN n±.recment arvi referr•ea to In the aforesaid Civil Code 1'or material: furn.lnhed or labor thereon of any kind, cr• for• _1_ Microfilmed with board order ouo37 I I.n f I-it, II.tilt.r I.lit, 111—!11%1 t I lin I:ran(.F. At:I. v-I th res.nr (,I- lhat :--ah, -.:III II. * ..! the Sam- In an a.-C113111. not. C I n f. t he arno tI,It I In.-buve url f,v, :It. a:1: !T 1:1 .7a:--c. .Mit I. broti;-Jilt• upon this. borid, '"ill pay, Ili ad-11tion to the farce imr)ufjt thereof', conts and -reavonalyle expenses and fee::, j nel utl ing reasoll.2ble attorney's fres, illcllrr•_'d by County (or ctt-. nssirriee) Ill. -uccc!ssfIljly enforc!nr Such CiAlf-atlell, to be 2val-ded and fixed the collrt� .111-1 to bt! taxed as conts and to be included in the jud.17.ment therein ran- dercl. It is herel'y expreszzl.,- ntiptilatc(I a..." ar7reed that this bond hall illurn to the 11crierit of any mid all pernv-r;, commariles aml corioratlons entitled to file clal.n ii-i-der Title ij (Corli-enclur. IlIth Section 30"�2) of I,nrt 4 cf 3 of the Civil Cade , so as to Five a r-Irlit of action to them or their assigiin in art.%- salt broul7lit upon this bond. Slivuld the cond1tion of this bond be fully verfcr-rcd thell tills obl —ation nhall becom-o utill and :'old, ot".er-wilne It -:iall Le and remain in full force anti errzc,;. C. llo alterr.tion of sald stib-iivisict, or ans, clan a,, stiecirication of sa_�- -.:vri: ,17.r . eei a -;" the r-rllCwlrtai and the-F Ccunt.y sh-ell reliev^ an*-- Stir-sty freir. Oil tills 1-orti ; and con- sent is he re I-y r.1ven tv r.,-!I:e such a It ernt I onn at: fort*ncr not!ne to or consent try Suret.-:; nn!. the Surety hiercty t-.niver, t'ne nrcv1sions. Cr Calif. Civil (:O,.,L- and holds it se::' Intind ;-It!:o--it rerard to and Jn0ependently -of any action against. I*rin1pal -whenever takert. SIG'HA) .'1:I0_: E.ALU) an August 30, 1976 PFIVCl FAI. su:u*.'ry Marybeth 1xivestors, Ltd. ,-_npELjTY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND I?yItz. — - — o Ft 7E�rbpn D At t?r�ej -D *L Let, Stat.i. of California 5. (ACK,'J0*6!I,E!,CsVF*.T OY St'liji'l'y) County of On the persoll(s) t-:!It)rc In/aro% rAirlied n-V.-Ir.f. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Contrra Costa -,:OUNTY Or }SS ON........^Hps�L27 I9.76 before me,the a undersigned,a Notary Public in and for said County and State personally appeared John Hallenbeck ----------------- .......... ......... ------------------ known to me to be one of the partners of the partnership that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such partnership executed the same- Notary's signatu —:2.1 PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT rem No,17 S-17ATE OF CALIFOI(N IA City A%t)C%jv%zv of Sv%FK.%.%ci,;c1% On 30 t h August before me 19__76. LEE MOGUA a Notary Public.in and for the City and County and State Erbon Delventhal afor,.A;d,duly conun-i-sitmed and swom.ptrumstly appeared ..... ...... known to me to Le the pvsoa whore rrkme ii subscribed to the foregoing instrument as the Arturney-in-Fac:of the Fidelity acd Uqy"it Compiny or Maryland.and acknowledged to tue th3t he suL,rri!md the rLitue of Fid.-lity and DrpcWat Company of Maryland thereto as St: -rc-y and hi own name as Atternvy-in-Fa or Tt icinandfortheState Ro in (_4r r r tary 00038 1!Iiar: J1T•i(ai�l;`)in,• !flit iii!ii 1::P':Ilt il•�T, �T Tir^ff1S�•a.:n !l r• n:r .✓ TO CLER', I;OARD OF at oclock - SUPERVI SORBIi. _ Contra Costa County Record:. J. R. OLSSON, County i:ecorder Fee - 8 Official - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Latter of Accepting and Giving PWSOLUTIOit OF ACCEPTANCE 11,01--ice of Completion of Contract with � dnd NOTICE OF COMPLETION Branaugh Excavating, Inc. (C.C. 03086, 3093) Fro3ect No. 0 1-4 - (661) RESOLUTIO ; 110. 76/783 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES TIMM The County of Contra Costa on May 24, 1976, contracted with , Branau h Excavatio Inc. 21483 orange Avenue, Castro Valley, CA 94546 - Ilame and Address of Con zrac for) for an asphalt concrete overlay on Moraga Way in the Orinda-boraga area, Project No. - - (661), With Insurance Company of Borth America as surety, - 7:a me of ponding Company) for uor_: to be performed on the Grounds of the County; and • The Public: :Works Director reDorts that said %-:ork has been inspected and co;3nlies with the approved flans, special provisions, and n tau?lard specifications, and reco=ends its acceptance as co.�lplete as of August 23, 1976 ; Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file frith the Cot i ty Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract_ PASSED A:ID AM TLD Oil Seatember 7, 1976 CERTIFICATION and V£RIFICATIC.3 I certify Mat the f oreroin- is a true and Correct cofly of a resolu- tion gild acceptance duly adopted and entered on ti:e cinutes of Lt:is ]hard's neet?r an the above date. I declare ?ndcrr penalty of perjury that the fore;-,oi.r--E is true and correct. Dated:-mber 7. 147 J. 1(. OLSSO:c, Cown-1.; Clenk fc at Martinez, California ex officio Clerk of the Boa--d BY e uty Lx Originator: Public Works Departmnt - Constructiorr-Division cc:�lii:C ori: W2U rC 611:•:1 Contractor Auditor 11ubli c ::nr':s RES01:1770;' ;:()- 76/783_ . 00039 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Agreement for Subdivision MS 46-76, ) Walnut Creek Area. ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/784 The following document was presented for Board approval this date: Subdivision Agreement with D.C. Development 4 Construction Co., subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; Said document was accompanied by security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Cash Bond deposited by D. C. Development and Construction Company in the amount of $2,000 for Faithful Performance and $2,500 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 139140, dated August 2S, 1976), in the amount of $500, deposited by: D. C. Development and Construction Company. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. Originating Department: Public t:orks Land Development Division cc: Public forks Director-B$S Public Works Director-LD County Treasurer-Tax Collector Director of Planning D.C. Development £ Construction Co. 2353 Boulevard Circle, Suite 2 :alnLt Creek, Californin 94595 RESOLUTION NO. 76/781 00040 (91) Subdivision: MS 46-76 Code 3at1u11-12) (yl) Subdivider: D.C. Development _ Company. Inc. (§1) Effective Date: September 3. 1976 (51) Completion Feriod: one year (§4) Deposits: A.' (Cash) 1. PAR ISS & DATF. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa,. G:i 3:o:•�:i:. s:re i f tt r c :1;^: "County". :nd the abovena.^ed Subdivider, mutually promise and a:-ce 2s fa:;cwz _czcer:tin;; :::is ssu.lirision: 2. I:•h?rZ0VE*-.%TS. Ssbdivider shall construct, install and complete road and street i-p-o:•c-_a_s, tract drainage. street signs, fire hydrants, and all i-marouzzents as require.? by the County Ordinance Code. especially Title 9, and including future amendmints, and a'.1 improve. _nts required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on rile in the County's Public Works Department. Subdivider shall ceaplete this +conk and improvements (hereinafter called. "work") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subeitisien ::no Act (Business & professions Code 9211500 and following), in a good work- aanl4ke manner, in accordance with accented construction practices and in a manner equal or s::jerior to the require-efts of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requiremen:s shall govern. 5. f..:AP!'.\'TEE 6 pill\"iE :L:CE. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be f:ea fro= defects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the Ccaaty Ordinance Code; and tie dial! maintain it for one year after its completion and accept:free aZainst any defective workmantNip or -materials or any unsatisfactory perf0.—..2ncc. SF.C::B eTY: DEPOSIT i BOSDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider sh-LI i, vurs•:a^.t to Business & Fra::ss:ors Code 911612, deposit as security with tl:c Cw.:nt1 SS,000.00 cash,, which gt irantees his faithful performance of this agreenent and -3irtenaace or the word for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any d_i:ctitie erk anship or caterials or any unsatisfactory perfor-mance; and - secares pa;-ent :o the contractor, to his suf:ontractors, and to persons renting equipment or. furnishing labor or -materials to these or to the Subdivider. S. IARBASTI•. Subdivider warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to acco,alish this work as promised in Section :; and if, at any tire before the County's resolution o- completion for tae subd-,ision, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make change: necessary to accomplish the work as promised. S. h3 VANE► BY COUNTY. Irspecticn of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/er m t+:rials inspected, or-statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County inlicatizg the work or any part ttercof complies with the recuirements of this Agreement, or ::eeptarcc of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials. or payments �creco-, or se:;• cest•irltion or all of these acts, shalt rot relieve the Subdivider of his abli,20 an to `::'_fi11 this contract as prescribed; not shall the County be thereby este.11-red fr:-: _..- :r.;; any :action for- damares irisin:: from the failure to comply kith any or the terns .:nil condit°a^s hereof. mkrofitmed with board order 0U04.� _ ._ .. . .- . . 'tom :.e:!� i:i i•:r %hzli I:cri: harmless and indemnify the indere:Uies rr3 the 11,1b.:_Irr •s defined in this section: . I.. The indem'ritiex benefited and protected by this promise aro the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents. and c•:apleyees. B. The HaHlit:es protected atainst are any liability or Blain for damage of any Und allegedly Sulu-4i leu,incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and ircludir.N persa:ezl injury. death, property damage. inrerse condemnation, or any . coabinstici of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or daAsge was unforeseeable at any tine before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the ie:proerer=nts as co:zpl_ted, and including the defense of aAy suit(s), action(s) or other p-occeding(s) concerning these. C. 'Ric actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in coazsction with the =eters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Sul-diLiser, cortractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or core o: thew. D. Ivan-Conditions: The p=aaiso and agree:.ent in this section is not conditioned or dere dent on mhc:her or not any Indecnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved wny p!;=(s) or specification(s) in connection with this uv-.k or subdivision, or has insurance or other•Indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indecaitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including Inspections th_rco:' and relo=ting existing utilities required thereby. 9. SU.."WE S. Subdivider shall sot aid establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed rmp and to the staisfaction of the"Cosnty Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. *AMN';frFC'ULUMCE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and ielprove-efts a:t::^ the ti-e speci:scd in this Agreement or extensions granted, Cirmty cry proceed to c.r;lete tires by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay tho " _ costs and ch-irge•s hcrofer i--ediately uppon '.nand. If Ccrinty sues to coal el performance of this Agreele:t or :ccor:r the cost of coseleting the improvements, Subd!vidor shall -pay all re7-senal :e: attorneys' fres, costs of suit, and ail other expenses cf litigation Incurred by Coupty in connection therewith. 11. JURSIMM. W. If before County :eeepts these loprovements, the subdivision Is annexed to T city, the County ray assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreerent and/or any deposit or band socurini them. 00042• 12. RECORD APAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to fil, and record the Final Map or Parcel Map for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) Vernon L. Cline, Public 11orrks Director By Deputy �petignate!o cial capacity z� :he- business; D. C. Development Co., Inc RECONIM&`'DED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute' acicnow- ` ledgment form below; and if a corporation, affix corporate seal. g J�..Assistant Py%Kic Works Director (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOHN! B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel BY �/�•1'� �� Dept,}/ * t t t * t t r * It t * * ♦ tt It r * i * s f t i * • t i t t r * t * rr # # �. * i s # t * yr # State of WTfornia ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of =s. �i�n�_1`' ) ss' or Individual) On (.t's._" . r-��!/97G the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Su iviaar and who-is are owm to me to be the i^.d!u44ws4* officer(��� as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. 1LLp•.:a N1NUIU•ut••uusa•....c.Ab..�•a.•a...., :/ (NOTARIAL SEAL) _ •"^.ice-1�: :.:.�'. ,µ '..,.-a. --s', •' _.. ,-� „ -.�.... .,.•.. -..._ = Notary Public for said County d State ,`uncut••.•ut•t••a•a••••u•neanut•.•nt•«•r•;a y (Subdiv. Agrnt: CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 5/76) -3- 00043 EXCERPTS FROM MINURES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF D. C. DEVELOP14ENT AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. RESOLVED, that Gregory Cherezian is authorized to act for D.C. Development and Construction Co., Inc. and sign whatever documents that are necessary in conducting the business affairs of the corporation to sign solely and individually for the corporation. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I am the Secretary of D. C. DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and that the above and foregoing is a true full and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the vote of the majority of the Board of Directors of said corporation, held at 2363 Boulevard Circle, Walnut Creek, California, on July 7, 1976 at 8:30 a.m. at which meeting all of the Board of Directors (or a quorum) were present and acting; that there is no provision in the Articles of Incorporation or the By-Laws of said corporation conflicting with said resolution and that the said resolution has not been modified or revoked and still remains in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand and seal of said;corporation this 7th day of July 1976. MARY S/CHEREZIAN, S m ztary D. C. DEVELOPMENT and CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC. Microfilmad with boaro oa;ar 00044 VP ri�(tSi. .:• !Tv f:., , ., TO CLI-EEK 101,M) Or' _ - - Si1Pi:ia'1TORS at cl'CID ch. 31. Contra Co::ta County Record J. R. OLSSON, County Recorder . Fee - S official - )30ARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COJINTY, CALIF ORI:IA In the 1-latter of Acceptin- and Giving ) FMOLUTIO : OF ACCRFTiLI;CD lIo tice of Completion of Contract with ) and NOTICE OF CO-•?LEMOIT Heinson Construction, Co. (C.C. s§3036, 3093) Work rder No. 99-76(927) 3 RESOLUTIO:: 110. 76/785 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on August 9, 1976 contracted -with Heinson Construction, Co., 4022-Racheco Blvd., Narriae?. CA 94sS3 lianme and fiddress of Con frac for) for pavement repair of taxiways within Buchanan Field Airport in the Concord Aroa� Work Order No. 4699-76 (927), xx3(ti'x xu(xxxxxxoc�?cx, )Ex�cxaoxzx�xx�ipc�%)cx�t)tI€��x1 - for vor'. to be performed or. the Gro::nds of the County; and The Publi(- 1.•7orks Director reLarts that said work has been ins_uectee ar_d complies ui th the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications,s, and recommen-dS its acceptance as co^ple to as of August 20, 1976 ; Therefore, said u ork is accepted as completed on said date, and the Cler): shall file with the CoL ity Recorder; a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Corpletion for said contract. PASSED IdID JI PT ED Oil September 7, 1976. CERTIFICAMON and 1'ERI.ICATiO;T I certify that tnc .o:ei;o_nG is a true and correct coat/ of a resolu- tion and acci;Pta_nce dilly adopted :nd entered on the r_ir_ut:.s of -Li.s )3-)ard'S neet?ng on 'Llic abcove date. I declare 12_nd:sr perial ty of ptrjt:ry- t?!at the fore,:T.oir.� is true nd correct. Dated: Santerr_ber 7, 197; J. R. OLSSON, Court, Clerk & at Ii mine:, Caliiornla ex Officio Clefk of the Board, Originator: Public Works Department (CICci Construction Division _ Con traC t 0 r r, •Public Works 0004t" Administrator _ 7__ BOARO*OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Authorizing Certification ) No. 1 of Right-of-Way in ) Connection with Kirker Pass ) Median Barrier Installation, ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 786 Project No. 5261-4310-663-76, ) (IV-CC-800-CR, FAS RS-800(4)) ) Concord Area. ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: In order to obtain Federal and State aid assistance from the State of California in connection with Kirker Pass Median Barrier Installation project, Project No. 5261-4310-663-76 (IV-CC-800-CR, FAS RS-800(4)), and for the State Department of Transportation to approve the project for advertising, it is necessary that the County of Contra Costa certify to the State Department of Transportation that the rights-of-way necessary for the proper execution of the project have been acquired. The Certification of Right-of-Way, Certification No. 1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, is hereby APPROVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa and the Chairman of the Board is hereby AUTHORIZED and ORDERED to execute the same for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976 unanimously by Supervisors present. Originator: Public Works Department, Real Property Division cc: County Administrator County Counsel Public Uorks (2) Real Property (6) RESOLUTION NO. 76/ 78s� 00046 Mr. T. R. Larners, District Diractor State Department of Transportation P. 0. Box 7885, Rincon Annex San Francisco, CA 94120 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY . RIGHT-OF-NAY CERTIFICATION Certification No. 1 IV-CC-800-CR State Identification Number FAS RS-800(4) Federal Program Number Kirker Pass Road (#5261-4310-663-76) Street, Road, or Project flame 1000 feet West South Hess Rd. to North Concord Area Hess Road Right-of-Way acquisition was not required for the construction of this project since all stork is being done as set forth beloar: 1. STATUS OF RIGHT-OF-NAY ACQUISITION All construction is within existing Right-of-Way. All Right-of-Way was acquired prior to July 1, 1971. 2. STATUS OF AFFECTED RAILROAD FACILITIES None 3. DESIGNATED MATERIAL SITES None 4. DESIGNATED DISPOSAL AREAS None 5. STATUS OF UTILITY RELOCATIONS None 6. SCHEDULE FOR REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS None 7, UNAUTHORIZED EKCROACHMENTS None - 1 - 00047 N 8. CO.MKIANCE WITH FEDERAL AIiD STATE REQUIREMENTS REMRDIflf THE Arni1T,TTTn;l nF RPkt PRnprRT1 4. DESIGNATED DISPOSAL AREAS None 5. STATUS OF UTILITY RELOCATIONS None 6. SCHEDULE FOR REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS gone 7. UNAUTHORIZED ENCROACHMErITS None - 1 - 0004'7 S. COt;PLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY The acquisition of Right-of-Way not required. 9. COiPLIANCE WITH RELOCATION ADVISORY ASSISTANCE AND PAYIMENTS PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAW The project did not require the displacement of any persons or business. I HEREBY CERTIFY the Right-of-Way on this project as conforming to Statement No. 1 of Paragraph 5c of FHPM-642.1. COUNTY OF COINTRA COSTA By ,',a"rman, Board o� Sup/Ierk er' "isors SEP 7 1976 ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOtJ,, Date: eputy Recommendded for Certification: By4ae , / Approved as to form: nL. Cli - Public 1•:orks Director JOHR B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel G. T. Darana Deputy Principal Real Property Agent - 2 - 00048 1''131',�i liI'C(�:i}l?n }�.•,iiii2:i j.:%tPolle 'Ta A4+ PT-1rs1Vo.,:•"F !Y�• TO CM-.*RK MAND OF SUI'I:i:V)'SDRS at o 1 clock M. • -- Contra Co^.ta County Record J. R. OLSSOII, County Recorder Fee - S official - 330A1lD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORINIA In the Batter of Accepting and Giving ) HESOLUTIO i OF ACCEPTANCt }lotice of Completion of Contract with ) and NOTICE OF COMPLLT1011 Soark5 Ro fing Co. , .oncnrd_ C.C. 9.§33086, 3993) (1120-178-7110-602) RESOLU^1ION HO. 76/787 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on April 20, 1975• contracted with ' Sparks Roofin; Co. , 4943 Laurel Drive, Concord, California flame and Address of Contractor for Re-roofing Various Buildings at the County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Avenue. Martine&, CA. with Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Pierced California as surety, 31ame of Bonding Company foi work to be performed on the grounds of the County; and The Publie dorls Director reports that said"-work has been insvected and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of (3. Amb r 71. 1075 - Therefore, said i'rork is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Coi:,aty Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for .said contract. A time .extension of 94 days is granted.to al1pw the roofing to cure • • properly prior to installing final reflective coating. PASSED AND ADOPTED Oil Sevtember 7. 1970 • CERTIFICATION and VERIFICATIOii I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolu- tion and acceatance duly adopted and entered on the rinutea of t1his �Ioard=s reetinc on the above date. I declare under penua ty of :perjury that the foregoing is true xid correct. Dated: September 7. 197; at ISartin::::, California cc:+ROCoI-a :1:a rcLa1.11 Con 1.rac&'or Aldi Lor. Public l:oi•l:. Acta�.i»i::i:r.=Loz• )WI;OM11110i1 NO. 76/7137 , 00049 { IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Federal Aid ) and State Highway Matching ) Funds for Fiscal Year 1976- ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/788 1977. ) WHEREAS on August 17, 1976 the Assistant Director of Highways, State Department of Transportation, forwarded official notice of amounts due Contra Costa County under the Federal Aid Highway Acts, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 2208 and 2210.5 of the Streets and Highways Code, as follows: Federal Aid Secondary Funds $172,141 State Highway Fund money for matching $ 86,071 and WHEREAS Section 2211 of the Streets and Highway Code requires the County within 60 days of receiving such notice to notify the State Department of Transportation as to what amount of the apportionment the County wishes to claim and to agree to provide any County matching funds as may be necessary after first considering the sum made available under Streets and Highways Code Section 2210.5; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County of Contra Costa does hereby notify the State Department of Transportation that the County of Contra Costa claims the said apportionment and the whole thereof, and that the County of Contra Costa does hereby agree to provide any County matching funds required as may be necessary after first considering the sum made available under Streets and Highways Code Section 2210.5. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on September 7, 1976. Originator: Public Works Department Road Design Division cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 76/78- 00050 RESOLUTION NO. 76/789 RESOLUTION DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR CONSTRUC- TION BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT AND MARKERS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3, SAN RAMON, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that this Board of Supervisors hereby orders that the installation of reflec- tive pavement and markers in Assessment District No. 1973-3, San Ramon, Contra Costa County, California, be had and donee in accordance with the plans and specifications for said work, which said plans and specifications are on file in the office of the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa. Said Board of Supervisors hereby orders that bids 'for the installation of reflective pavement and markers shall be received on the 28th day of September, 1976, at the hour of 11:00 o'clock A.M. of said day, in the office of the Clerk of the Board, Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California, which said time and place are hereby fixed as the time and place of a public meeting at which said bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared, will be calculated by the Engineer of Work, their report returned to the Clerk of the Board, and the report of the results of the bidding and the calculations of the Engineer of Work will be reported to t -1- 00051 the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. The Board of Supervisors reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or bids, should it deem this necessary for the pub- lic good, and also the bid of any bidder who has been delin- quent or unfaithful in any former contract with the County of Contra Costa. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the seventh day of September, 1976. ATTEST: JAMES R. OLSSON, Clerk By. cc: Bond Counsel Engineer of Work Public Works Director County Counsel County Auditor-Controller County Administrator Mr. George Gordon, Attorney 00052 NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3, SAN RAMON, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improve- ment Act of 1913 of the State of California, and to resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa directing this Notice, said Board of Supervisors hereby invites sealed bids and proposals for the installation of re- flective pavement markers as described in the Resolution of Intention, as amended, in the above entitled matter, of said Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. Said Resolution of Intention, as amended, is hereby referred to for a description of said work and improvement, the grades to which it is to be done, a description of the district to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, the bonds to be issued, and for all further particulars contained in said Resolution of Intention, as amended. Reference is hereby further made to the plans and specifications and detailed draw- ings for said work on file in the office of the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa, in accordance with which said work shall be done. -1- C _ Microfilmed with board order 00053 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa has adopted and published a scale of prevailing wage rates and that copies thereof are on file with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa and shall be made available to any interested party upon request. Please note that the contractor shall be required to post a copy thereof at each job site. The contractor shall in the performance of tZte work and improvements conform to the Labor Code of the State of California and other laws of the State of California appli- cable thereto, with the exception only of such variations as may be required under the special statutes pursuant to which proceedings hereunder are taken and which have not been superseded by the provisions of the Labor Code. Preference to labor shall be given only in the manner provided by law. Veterans and resident local labor shall be given preference by the contractor whenever possible, if skill and working ability permit without increasing the ultimate cost of the work and improvement to the County of Contra Costa. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that payments will be made to the contractor in cash by said County of Contra Costa, but only from the proceeds of any assessments which are paid in cash or from the proceeds of the sale of any bonds which are -2- 00054 i to be issued on the unpaid assessments. Said payment will be made to the contractor based upon the provisions in the speci- fications for payment based upon the quantity of labor and materials furnished by said contractor. Commencing not more than sixty (60) days after the commencement of the work and within the first five (5) days of each calendar month during the construction period there- after, the contractor shall submit to the Engineer an itemized bill of the quantity and value of the materials accepted and work performed prior to the end of the preceding month, and the Engineer will, within a reasonable time, check such bill, make his estimate of the value of the same in accordance with the terms of the contract, and ninety per cent (908) thereof shall be paid to said contractor on or before the 15th day of said calendar month; the remaining ten per cent (108) of the amount due the contractor shall be paid thirty- five (35) days after completion of all of said work and improve- ment and acceptance thereof by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. All proposals or bids shall be accompanied by a check payable to said County of Contra Costa and certified by a responsible bank for an amount which shall not be less than ten per cent (108) of the aggregate of the proposal, or by a -3- . 00055 i f bond for said amount and so payable, signed by the bidder and two sureties who shall justify, before any officer compe- tent to administer an oath, in double the said amount, and over and above all statutory exemptions, or by a corporate surety bond in said amount satisfactory to the engineer. The time fixed for receiving sealed bids or proposals for the doing of said work and improvement herein ordered is the 28th day of September, 1976, at the hour of 11:00 o'clock A.M. of said day, in the office of the Clerk of the Board, Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California. Said bids, after being publicly opened, examined and declared, will be calculated by the Engineer of Work, their report returned to the Clerk of the Board, and the report of the results of the bidding and the calculations of the Engineer of Work will be reported to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or bids, should it deem this necessary for the public good, and also the bid of any bidder who has been delin- quent or unfaithful in any former contract with the County of Contra Costa_ Plans and specifications may be obtained from the office of the Engineer of Work, Coleman, Selmi & Simpkins, ' =4- (�U056 201 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, Greenbrae, California, 94904, upon a deposit therefor of $25.00. $10.00 of said deposit shall be refunded within.ten days of bid opening. DATED: September 7, 1976. JAMES R. OLSSON, County Clerk, Contra Costa County, California an L. Miller, Deputy Clerk . 00057 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE.OF CALIFORNIA In the Diatter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/790 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll had the information been correctly furnished; therefore, such error on the roll should be corrected in accordance with Section 4831.5 .of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund: Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value Change R/T 'Code Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 2068 Raymond W. Hitchcock Pers Prop $ 50 $ -0- -$ 50 4831.5 Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 3594 Apache Village Inc. Pers Prop $ 320 $ -0- -$ 320 4831.5 Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 4105 Courtney Jones Pers Prop $ 50 $ -0- -$ 50 4831.5 Code 11003 - Assmt. No. 3533 Opal Loudermilk Pers Prop $ 200 $ -0- -$ 200 4831.5 R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor t8/27/76 cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of RESOLUTION NO. 76/790 00058 �µ AND, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4985, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption - fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error, should be cancelled if it is impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to delinquency date, upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date correction is entered on the roll or abstract record: Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value Change R/T Code Code 07013 - Assmt. No. 2075 Markstein Beverage Co. Olympia Brewing Co. Pers Prop $ 3,460 $ 3,120 -$ 340 4831.5; 4985 Code 09044 - Assmt. No. 3506 Watson Communication Systems Pers Prop $ 1,240 $ 81S -$ 425 4831.5; 4985 Code 83003 - Assmt. No. 3508 Smiser Freight Service Pers Prop $ 87S $ 23S -$ 640 4831.5; 4985 Penalty 88 88 -0- Code 83006 - Assmt. No. 3501 Watson Communication Sys. Inc. Imps $10,450 $ 9,625 -$ 825 4831.5; 4985 Code 83013 - Assmt. No. 3507 Watson Communication Sys. Inc. Imps $15,565 $14,455 -$1,110 4831.5; 4985 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund: Code 02002 - Assmt. No. 4044 Computer Systems of America Pers Prop $83,055 $ -0- -$83,055 4831 Code 08001 - Assmt. No. 3522 Compugraphic Corp. Pers Prop $ 2,S5C $ -0- -$2,550 4831 Code 09005 - Ass:nt. No. 2001 Virgil A. McCall Pers Prop $ 120 $ -0- -$ 120 4831 R. 0. SE. 1 N, Assistant Assessor Page 2 of 00059 Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Property Value Value Change R/T Code Code 66061 - Assmt. No. 3523 Delmer and Lois Smith Pers Prop $ 185 $ -0- -$ 185 4831 Bus Inv Ex 95 -0- 95 4831 Penalty 9 -0- - 9 4831 Code 73020 - Assmt. No. 3511 Mrs. Olga Herman Possessory Interest - Imps $ 250 $ -0- -$ 250 4831 Land 120 -0- - 120 4831 Code 83024 - Assmt. No. 3608 Language Associates Possessory Interest - Imps $ 9,220 $ -0- -$9,220 4831 Land 3,010 -0- - 3,010 4831 Code 85004 - Assmt. No. 3502 Girard-Hopkins Inc. Pers Prop $ 1,070 $ -0- -$1,070 4831 Imps 1,465 -0- - 1,465 4831 Code 85064 - Assmt. No. 3521 Lois Crupper Pers Prop $ 1,040 $ -0- -$1,040 4831 Code 98003 - Assmt. No. 3570 Andre Puyans David Inks Pers Prop $ 1,235 $ -0- -$1,235 4831 Bus Inv Ex 400 -0- 400 4831 AND, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4985 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error, should be cancelled if it is impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to delinquency date, upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date correction is entered on the roll or abstract record: Code 02002 - Assmt. No. 4403 Alex Madonna Pers Prop $115,250 $79,835 -$35,415 4831; 4985 Code 82038 - Assmt. No. 3506 William and Evelyn J. Hoover Imps $ 1,710 $ 1,710 -0- 4831; 4985 Homeowners Ex -0- 1,710` -$1,710 4831; 218 *Pursuant to Section 21S Rev/Tax Code. l R. 0. S EATON, Assistant Assessor Page 3 of 00060 r.� It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee failed to report accurately taxable tangible - property, to the extent that this failure caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll had the property been reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the property not reported should be assessed as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and interest on taxes thereon should be added in accordance with Section 506: Code 02002 - Assmt. No. 8090 For Year 1976-77 Kellie Ross Inc. dba A B Dick Products Co. of Concord 1811 Broadway Concord, CA 94520 Assessed valuation - Personal Property $ 420 Assessee has submitted signed business property statement. I hereby consent to the above OZLA& changes and/or corrections: R. , Assistant Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSE , County Counsel Y Deputy Adopted by the Board on..-SER-7_.QB___ Page 4 of 1� 00061 t IY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GF CC--11V-',A COSTA COUNTX, STATE OF CALIFOR:iIA - In the 1:atter of Changes ) of the Assessment :toll ) R_SCLUTIO t 110- 76/791 of Contra Costs County ) tiid✓RwhS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; HOWJ ;-;r;FCR::, BE IT RZSCLVED that the County Auditor is authorised to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976 - 1977 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and ghat should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section VJ31 of the Cslifor.ila Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the :ssessor on t_-.a roll :ahosld be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5095 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund; The following boats and aircraft were erroneously assessed in oar count. Since the situs of each boat and aircraft has been detarrined to be another county where they have been assessed for the 1976-77 fiscal ;dear, these assessments should be corrected to zero value. Original 'ode and Loat or Assessed Assnt. _':o. Assessee Aircraft ?:o. Value 0300)-0129 William L. Stanley CF 66O2 FD > 240 06002-0087 ._arvin E. Shanks CF 0995 Ej y 160 06002-0177 s:arl C. l:hisenhunt OF 0772 PF 480 53002-0176 Robert L. i,affei Or 7165 CJ :;,7,0$0 6606 i-UO19 Lionell Lindstrom CF 2294 LP 3 c:lO ?9005-0203 James bishop CF 21101 ::T Y 690 79111-y2172 JaratJR. Hansen AC ; G6794 X3,000 8203,3-1250 3obertC. Brixner CF 3631 FG : 1,970 02030-9004 L_zald i. 'orter CF 0267 FL 52,870 82044!-U rt0 srthur j. Schulze 3F 7814 FG $1,440 98026-0016 .:obert n. C;riest^-an CF 62" Fit 3 200 t U. .}eatun Assistant Assessor CC: assessor (''c:se) iiL`d- Tax Coll ctor raga 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 76/791 OOa62- The following sssessm�-nts were erroneously levied on hosts that were sold prior to the lien date, and should therefore be corrected to zero value. Original Code and Assessed Assat. "o. Assessea Boat do. Value 02001-OU17 David D. Fisher Cif 13-13 EK 800 02002-0526 Joseph -'. girth CF 6901 EY 4 330 07013-0041 Eugene i . javillo Cr 6936 Alii !� 150 08001-0840 Jo=n H. Finn CF 5495 AG G 490 53009-0172 I.. J. Catled�e R. h. ? elsh CF 18}_5 CJ 4; 220 62022-0035 C. Langston 262-415 $ 750 79055-0004 Carl 1.1. Jones Cr 2721 F11 $1,230 52048-0786 Karl Sendelbach CF 9241 CC � 450 85023-0053 _:eU Edwin Collaro C= 3399 SU ITI 420 KFD, FRT-Hi.:t, in accordance with Section 4985 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redenption ponsltj, interest, or redemption fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error, should be cancelled if it is icipossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to delinquency da-,.e, upon the stowing that pant of the corrected or additional a=mount was made within 30 days from the date correction is entered on the roll or abstract record: L,ue to incorrect -Information re;;arding the description of each of the following boats and aircraft, the highest values were used in esti:natine assessed valuations. After receiving more detailed information and upon physical examinations, it has been determined that tha following corrections should be made. Original Corrected Code and Boat or Assessed Assessed AsSMIG. 110. Assessee Aircraft No. Value Value 03UO3-0092 Black Cad. ;.otors CF 3709 FG Z� 910 650 79111-A2103 .tarry-Doose a :2865% X5,600 $4,750 v20t�� -0128 :iancie R. :7esthorpe OF 2041 r X1,230 i� 630 55025-A2016 Dot: W. Garvin AC -7799 43,2U0 1;1,000 FURTKO-4, for the 1975-76 fiscal year: Code 03001 - Assessment io. 0092, boat CF 6802 FD is erroneously assessed to MI liam L. Stanley, assessed value w270. Since the situs has been determined to be Plumes Co:;nty ;:here it has been assessed for 197-5-76, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. R. �aaton Assistant Assessor gaga 2 of 3 00063 i Ai'D for the 1973-74 fiscal year: Code 82014 - ns-essmen.t No. 0131, boat CF 7041 C.T is erroneously assessed to R. W. Uoslin, assessed value 467U. Since this boat was sold prior to tha lien date, this assessment should be corrected to r.3ro value. r hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections. JOHN B. CIUMS , COunty CO'' Sol R. 0. Seaton ' __ouL Assistant Assessor Adopted by the Board on....S EP 7 .1976 ..-.� age 3 of 3 00064 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTf. COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the ratter of Changes ) of the Assessment Holl ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION RIO. 76/792 'v!I EREAS, the County Assessor having riled with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consanted to by County Counsel; NO'rI, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1974-75 It has been determined that the following properties would h«:-a qualified for an exemption_ pursuant to Article XIII, Section k(b), of the Stats Constitution. Since the properties were acquired after the beginning of the fiscal year but would have qualified for the exemption had they been o:,rned by the organization on the lien date and had the organization been in existonce on the lien date, and since an appropriate application was not filed within the time required, eighty- five percent (85,.) of any tax or penalty or interest should be canceled pursuant to Sections 271(a)(2) and 271(b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and, further, pursuant to Section 271(c) of the Revanue and Taxation Code, any tax or penalty or interest thereon exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) in total amount should be canceled or refundd. On Parcel No. 232-130-032-5, Tax Rate Area 11;002, Yluriol M. James, c/o TIE NATIONAL BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCHES (DISCIP -'S OF CHRIST) should be allowed a welfare exemption of $8,075. On parcel No. 232-130-035-6, Tax Rate A 3a 14002, Muriel M. Ja_mea, c/o T.H—Z MA T70NA:, BENEVOL"NIT ASSOCIATION Off' THE CHRISTIAU CHURCiMS (DISCIPLES OF C;LRIST) should bz allowed a ctelfare exemption of $8,075. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEAN, Assistant Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSF-K, County Counsel t/8-27-70 Cop;,, to: ".r (Rod:?nr:) By Auditor / Deputy Tax C-hector Adopted by the Board on.__$ P2,�,,7 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 76/792 y 00065 � IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE 0? CALIFORNIA in t.h•2, Matter of Changes ) _ of the i:.ssessment doll } of Contra Costa County } RESOmLIUTION A!O. 76/793 ) Wbi-E 3- .S, the County Assessor having filed .with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THT-7gFFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County =auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained by the Assessor that there has been a clerical error of the asc-esssc in information furnished the Assessor which caused thw ?assessor to enter the assessment at a higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll had such application been correctly filed. Pursuant to Section 4831.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the following corrections should be entered on the roll. It has been determined that this property* would have qualified for an exemption purcuant to Article XIII, Section 4(b), of the Constitution; therefore, nin::ty percent (90 ) of any tax or penalty or interest should be canceled pursuant to Suction 270(u)(1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and, further, pax-srant to Section 270(b) at the Revenue and Taxation Code, any tax or penalty or interest thereon exceedi- two hundred and fifty dollars (?'50) in total amount shall be canceled or This correction is to be entered on the unsecured tae roll. In Tax Rate Area 08001, Bill No. 16208, YOUNG LIFE C IMFAIGN should be allowed a welfare exemption in the amount of $63. j I hereby consent to the above T changes and/or corrections:ie 03, Assistant Assessor JOHN B. CLAr1SF.Ei, county Counsel t/8-25/76 Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) B Auditor Deputy ^ax Collector .AdopW by aha Board on....SEP 7� 1976_..... Page I of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 76/793 00066 I%- TI`X BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 0 ' CONTRA CO.iT-A COUNTY, STAT---: OF Cl:LIFOREIA in the I-latter of Chnn es ) of the Aase.mint Roll ) of Contra Costa County } RESOLUTION N1. 76/794 } FIFrRREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board raq x-.!sts for corr tetion of erroneous asseasnsntn, said rcguests having bean consttntad to by County Counsel; !Mi, TH R_FORE, B; IT RESOLVED that the ^Corny Auditor is sthori=ed to correct the fnllowing assessrse:nts For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 it hoz :;;Lr. .3u^rtained from the assassr:^nt roll and froiI pap-n--z, in the Asseosorla 01'ficz ::hat wase intended and :,chat should have been assessed; aged, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 1-rd831, th-I followin" %efects in descrintior: nn 3/or forts and clerical errors of tht- Assessor on tha rn'_1 z6ould he corrected. Further, in accor:iance with -Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncoll�-ct�d J-,,lingt:-:nt prinnity, c9 t, redemption penalty, interest, or :^cdenptaon fee �ha_•ctofor-2- or hereafter aitached dus to such c:-_or shrulc be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or adMit Tonal amount vas =ade witilin 10 days fror: the date th:: corraction io anterad on the roll or rib3tract record as it was ir:poss iLln to complete valid proccduras iritlatcd prior to th.3 d•,?inquency date. It has been ascertained from papers in the Assessorts Of-rice that pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code SaeUon 273.5, claimants for the veter ups' axonption who filed a claLm subsequent to April 15, 1976, and whom the Assessor has azcertained to be eligible should be allowed an axenption of the lesser of eight hundred dollars ($800) or 80 percent of the assaased valus of tho property, as follows: On Boat No. CF 5001 BC, Tax Rate ,'%ren 82038, Bill No. 1269, D!-M-NIS A. D411I3 should be allowed a partial vateransl exemption in th•:! amount of $120. I hereby consent to the abovo changes and/or correction:..: R. O. :i _'.:...ist:.nt Ass-c.:or JOHN B. CL-ITISENCot.mty Co unsel cony to: iter fBaord Tay call-etor Adoptad by ..._S ?` 1 of I RESOLUTION NO. 76/794 00067 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA C-,3TA COU211171, STAT: OF CALIFORNIA In tht :.atter of Chances ) of the Assessment Roll } of Contra Costa Count- ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/795 4411Er.P _AS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; NODI, THEREWOR`., B7 -TT RESOLVED that the Coa_*zty Auditor is dirccted to add the following escape ayseso"ients ?or the Fiscal Year 1973-77 It has been ascertained from records in tha zJJ:Juor's Office that the followng homeowner's exemption claims aero incorrectly allowed. Therefore, ercapo assessments should be made pursuant to Section 531.6 of the Revenue and TPxation Code, and a penalty of 25 pereant of the amount of the escape ass•cssmcnt should be applied as providad in Section 504 of the Rovenue and Tax—v.tion Code. Interest on taxes should be added in accordance with Section 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Assessees have been notified. Tax Rate mount of ?en alty parcel `lumber Area Bscaoe MT 50!0 Assessee 033-030-01 -7 X039 1."I50 T437.50 riartpton, John T. Jr. 8: Ilene 071-045-037-2 01004 $1750 IL37.50 Dean, Betty L. 073-101-013-8 07013 1750 437.50 Blankenship, Floyd A. 095-022-001-2 79102 $1750 437.50 Foust, Marvin S. & Ella M. 115-374-001-2 02001 1750 $437.50 Forinash, Donald G. & Yoko A. l.ls0-052-021-7 09010y�1750 $37.50 Buse, Donald E. Sylvia A. 189-230-022-7 090. 8 ;1750 .637.50 Abernethy, Katherine S. 218-362-0^5-7 66101 $1750 fP437.50 Davis, Robert R. & Maril3,n D. ?:,8-410-011 Y 8830011, $1750 S437.50 Arellano, I3ax G. & Joan S. 273-212-0114-9 83031 $1750 *437.50 Lao, Geor`e L. & Laura J. c/o Lee, Roger A. 414-292-006-7 08024 $1750 %37.50 Bardis, Louis ?.c Ellie 11,20-172-020-0 85108 $1750 $437.50 Jones, Robert E. 529-28'-002-3 08001 $1750 $►!37.50 Webb, Grace I hereby consent to the above / chqunEo3 and/or corrections: St..It =":ssassor JOT-1 R. C- .tTSE:I, County Counsel r�- ��_ 5y „-iLor leptcd Depot; CollectorSEP7197fiAy the Gard on._.____.__..-__. RESOLUTION NO. 76/795 00068 r !N THE X30-`_RO OF SUPERVISORS OF COT;'-`A COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF C?1LIFORIZA In the I•atter of Chan-es ) of the Anzassm::nt Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION HO. 76/796 l hE—ER_ EAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THMLI'ORE, B= IT RESMVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has boar ascor:airiod from the assessment roll and .from papers in tho Assessor'a Office what was intended and what should have baen assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Sec;.icn 4831, the following defects in description and/or fors: and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Coda, any uncollected delinquent penalty, coat, redemption penalty, intara3t, or redemption tee heretofore or hereafter attach: due to such error should be canc2lad upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was wade within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delingi;ency date.- - It has bean ascertained Iron papers in the Asse3sor's Office that pursuant to R:venuz) and Taxation Code Section 275(c), claimants for tha homeowner's property tax exemption who filed a claim sabsequant to Yoril 15, 2976, a-rid whop the Assessor has wacertained to be eligible should ba allowed $1,1,00 or 80% of the assessad value, as stated below: Parcel dumber Tax Hate 'rea Allow Assessee 5:.00bOla 0 Conn, Donald r:. &- Birgit 011-�'S1-01�-8 60007I1t00 Richards, Thanes Draw 2: Vicki F. 032-021-0041-1 8201LL $1400 Jessie, Vincont & H-elen 035-070-003-5 8204.7 S�lLOO Boykin, Leo R. & Virginia M. 073-071-003-5 07013 4W,-00 iijares, Leo E. 074-171-003-1 01002 14400 _`Iarmon, George W. & Janell K. 07?',-3:2-043 0109= 1400 Breding, Harriet 089-21� 029-6 07913 Farkas, Robert; A. 2: Virginia L. 089- 'l%-036-1 07013 ;111100 Berg, Timothy S. Melody N. -39:�-101-043-9 070-23 -lVLOO Ahmad, Man::oor %c Gufoora 11 -=1?-OY9-5 02002 51400 Stewat•t, JsrRes A. & tDarbara D. '71-020--- ^_01a1)a 00 Yeo, Carolyn Su:' _ -^i3'-030-0 0_-100:_ :?lt;0 Klin-peter, ?hilir D. E- Nancy W. 11 -� i-t170-O 0 '00 :',1!,.00 Chris tian��n, .arr-,y & Audrey ?a,f-e 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. 76/796 00069 1 Parcel 11 ax irate Area Allow As3easee llb-0�3-001- 79172 X1400 Johnson, Christopher F,. a Sally c/o Bartels, Hann J. & Alexandra 79038 $1400 huller, Raymond G. 117-_301-023-0 02001 1400 Tarzia, Paul P. & hose L. 13005 : 1400 Dan-Jello, John J. 8: Florence 133-3�0-098-0 02002 $14,00 Sig:,_o na, Geoffer, C. -ii-553-X05-5 n C 1_ $11,'J Br zc�, Jr S. alie 162-142-005-6 05061 1400 Crockett, John A. 6: Vicki Jo 182-080-001-7 98002 MOO Valenzuela, Philip M. & Linda L. 185-290-0111-0 73001 $11,00 Oldone, Lavona 189-260-023-8 090}}$ S1LOO Kahn, Ruth L. & Colton, Marcia A. 189-310-097-2 09048 X1400 Gardner, Lois C. & Cox, Katharin^ C. 189-•1T1=-058-1 09000 .PZ400 Hayden, -lsie E. 195-111-028-5 660,111 $11}00 Atwater, Daniel C. Jr. & Virginia Skinner, 'Kristie 216-000-022-9 66035 8140C Symnons, Edward & Carol 218-323-023-0 15086 11;00 Willis, Shirley Uigon 21;1-270-005-2 14003 $11100 Duffel Financial & Construction Co. c/o Hamilton, David W. 2110-873-004-9 14002 $1400 Carter, Peter L. 25F"'--'S *J^--C- 15002 b140o Huck:, Joseph 'i. & r�evales A. 2611-074-003-7 83004 '1400 Bacon, Ernest 265-032-004-1 830012 1400 Mason, Harold G. & Lucile L. 358-164-002-0 6201,2 X1400 flainville, Thomas L. & M. Carmel 372-032-008-8 05001 $1400 Cuminos, Larry F. Curriings, Andy E'. Fc Inez T. 4.03-?72-0+01}-4 $0028 $11,00 Ojeda, -dwar d L. 406-034-003-9 08076 X1400 Gary, Leon 4.10-122-001-2 11009 $1400 De Ls Faz, Telesforo Jr. &: 0. 413-04'-,')-036-9 11001 $1400 Lance, 1:illiam Carl 425-190-003-3 65015 $1400 Henry, Patrick Guy3 'lonnie J. 50 -0°J-021}-3 0800? :;) . Clarke, Raymond H. � t3slen J. ' 1 -2j8-011-3 ,8081; "p11r00 1 anderzon, Aaron Mi. & Glenda D. 2 08001 $3AO0 Williamson, Leon^*•d Ii. & Linda C. 51 -11i0-012-1 08001 `''1400 Cole, Luverne J. & Vesta A. 515-Z5C)-010-6 03001 .1400 Vasquez, Ronald & Harriet F. 54^,-200-016-9 08001 $1400 Robinson, Morris L. & Alice H. 51}9-'`',2-x'01-4 03001 $11100 Shipp, Thomas C. On Parcel ?:umber 177-240-027-9, Tax ,ate Arca 09000, aaajamo, Seppo J. :z Tanja A. and Sasjauno, Tai.3tc K. & Gloria J. should be allowed a double homeowner's exenDtion in the total amount of $3,150. Thi exemption of 81,750 now on the roll should be removed. On Boat No. C» 2620 EY, Tax nate Area 53002, Bill No. 01}36, Eugene L. Olson should be allowed tho horn--owner's exemption in the amount of $1,4GO. On Boat No. CF 7?�4.9 AJ, Tax ?ate area. 53009, Bill +0. 0071, Charles W. Jo--dan should be allow"d the homeo:•:nsr's nxemption in the xiount of $600. Altholit--,h th-• f,)11-ow1nS .a...".sessoi?s tine-1 filed a hmmeownur's :C-m,)tion cltiin, addiitinrr! Z i`_ll onmat'ion rias n:?—je i before the claire:. cd:c:3 he allow-:id. Th :n 'e;"ation has now been provided. Therefore, th- e -ins should b� is accordance with Sactien 255.1 of the R�-v -,nu•: and Taxation Codu. tlr._x Rol:-n .r:.:[ : low i1750 :?archer, & J^:gutta ')1.1:12 S17-50 Burrows, ?ex=o�.d L. _. Sandra V. 3 00070 J 1 ?a.cel 'ia:ber Tax 3atQ Area Allow Assessee 087-254.-006-3-3 070 3 $1750 Rancher, Ernest 177-160-033-3 980032750 FSalley, John 360-2n!-008-6 7r,n,I 750 Fredrickson, Donald R. � Sharon- 080-;6 haron !�08-0r3-005_7 080;0 113-750 Brasley, T. J. & Fay "Etta 5La-2K3-t 02-i 080111 $1750 Liberty, ;4a:gic L. c/o Knox, Loretha Thi foilowinr assessees rare erroneously not mailed a he.rieovrner's exemption forn. As the :assessor did not conform to section 255.3 o: the d,�vsnue and Taxation Code, the exemption should be aHOWIA Parcel Tiumfber Tax Rat-: Area. Allow Assessee 202-15 -003-3 66035 $1750 FAR.ROTT, Howard G. 3r. & Gaal 1 hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: Ti. 0. SEATO!!, 'ssistsnt Assessor B. CL4tiSu1, County Counsel t/8-25-76 Copy to: hssassor (Ro:,.ers) By Auditor Deputy Ta Collector Adopted by the Board on.-.S EP_7-M ___.. pasz 3 0� 3 00.071 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of: ) RESOLUTION 110. 76/797 Support of Assembly Bill 3627. ) WHEREAS the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has received a request from the County Administrator and Director, Human Resources Agency, for support of Assembly Bill 3627; and WHEREAS Assembly Bill 3627 will permit any county in the State which has a Conciliation Court to raise its fees; and WHEREAS the Conciliation Court has strong community support for its continuance; and WHEREAS the adoption of Assembly Bill 3627 would mean addditional revenue to Contra Costa County for operational costs of the Conciliation Court; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors endorses Assembly Bill 3627 and urges the Governor of California to sign it. PASSED ON September 7, 1976. cc: Human Resources Agency County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Governor Edmund G_ Brown, Jr. RESOLUTION! NO. 76/79-7 000'72 -ARB OF SUPERVISCRS, CONTRA COST P% COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Rescinding Resolution No. 76/738 ) or. Elect on Consolidat;o_n-- ) Richmiond I•;ayoral Election ) RESi?LJTIUFI 140. 76/ 793 Amendment ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa C,.-.nt;; RESOINES THAT: This Board on August 24, 1976 adopted Resolution No. 76/733 consolidating the election on a proposed a: en -ent of the Charter of the Cit;• of Richnond providing for a mayor to be elected by the Voters of said Citl with the November 2, 197:: General Election. The City of Richnond subsequently requesteithat the aforenoted consolidation be rescinded by this Board. Resolution No. 706/738 is hereby rescinded. PASSED on September 7, 1976 by vote of a majority of Supervisors pre:.ent and voting. AE:-me cc: City of Richmond County Clerk (Elections) County uditor-Controller Count'.. Counsel C.)untr ldministrator ..::SOI==J'_TO'' '.e ;cJ 72.3 000'73; IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATL- OF CALIFORNIA In the Hatter of Certification ) of 1970 Population Figures for ) County Park Districts and ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/798A Service Areas. ) The Board having on August 10, 1976 referred to the Director of Planning a letter from the State Department of Parks and Recreation requesting certification of 1970 population figures for County Park Districts and Service Areas; and Said population figures having been furnished to the State by letter of the Director of Planning on the same date; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the aforementioned population figures as shown in the attachment to this resolution are certified by this Board of Supervisors. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board send a copy of this resolution and attachment to the Office of Grants and Local Assistance, State Department of Parks and Recreation, P.O. Box 2390, Sacramento, California 95811. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. cc: Director of Planning County Administrator Office of Grants and Local Assistance (9/16) RESOLUTION NO. 76/798A 0007 .................. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1970 POPULATION for the following areas: Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District 24,729 Green Valley Recreation & Park District 1,064 Kensington Community Services District 5,823 Rollingwood-Wilart Recreation & Park District 2,880 Valley Community Services District 5,000 Montalvin Manor County Service Area (M-17) 10,953 Oakley County Service Area (LIB-11) 2,563 Moraga Park & Recreation Authority (R-4) 11,327 Orinda County Service Area (R-6) 14,756 San Ramon Valley County Service Area (R-7) 23,132 El Sobrante County Service Area (R-9) 10,803 Walnut Creek Service Area (R-8) 64,844 " (City 39,844 - County 25,000) East Contra Costa County 13,889 00075 V 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changing the ) !Jame of a Portion of Ashby Way ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/799 to Laguna Place, San Ramon ) Area. ) File No. 1752 WHEREAS this Board having heretofore on August 17, 1976 declared its intention to change the name of a certain county road in Supervisorial District V; and having fixed September 7, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing on said resolution of intention; and notice of said hearing having been posted in the manner and for the time required by law, as evidenced by Affidavit of Posting of August 26, 1976 on file herein; and WHEREAS this being the time fixed for said hearing and 1� said Board having fully considered said matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the name of said road be and the same is hereby CHANGED as follows: OFFICIALLY NAMED FROM DESCRIPTION AND DESIGNATED ASHBY WAY Ashby Way from Pine LAGUNA PLACE San Ramon area Valley Road southerly, a distance of 0.04 miles PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. cc: Recorder Public Works Planning Commission Jury Commissioner Draftsman Postmaster, San Ramon San Ramon Valley Unified School District Valley Community Services District — Fire Department E.B.M.U.D., Oakland E.B.M.U.D., Walnut Creek Western Title Guaranty Company, Martinez P. G. & E., Company, Hayward Pacific Telephone Company, Oakland Pacific Telephone Company, Concord California Highway Patrol Thomas Brothers Maps California State Automobile Association State Department of Transportation RESOLUTION NO. 76/799 00075 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of . Increase in Contract Contingency Fund, Crow Canyon Road Reconstruction, Danville Area. Project No. 4711-4329-76(661) On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an increase of $5,000 in the contract contingency fund for the Crow Canyon Road reconstruction project, Danville area, is APPROVED, said increase to provide for (a) additional cost of removal of an abandoned building, (b) partial reconstruction of the median, and (c) maintenance of the contingency fund to allow for other unforeseen work. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Construction Division Supervisors cc: L. s L. Equipment affixed this-7th day of_Sentember . 19 76 19 Lindsey Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator ey Deputy Clark County Audi tor-Control ler Jean L. A+.i.11er 11•24 3/76 15m 00- 077, f 1077 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . 19 76 In the Matter of Increase in Contract Contingency Fund, Diablo Road Reconstruction, Danville Area Project No. 4721-4159-74(661) On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED THAT an increase of $8,000 in the contract contingency fund for the Diablo Road Reconstruction Project, Danville area, is APPROVED, said increase to provide for an unanticipated overrun in the quantity of asphalt concrete and to maintain the contingency fund balance to allow for other unforeseen work. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Construction Division Supervisors cc: Martin Bros. affixed this 7th day of September 19 76 P. 0. Box 5638 Concord, CA 94524 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By / g e4_,_l , Deputy Clerk County Auditor-Controller .lean L. 1-1i2ler H-Id 3(76!Sm Otla'78 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving and Authorizing Payment for Property Acquisition. North Richmond By-Pass. Project No. 0572-4345-663-72 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement and Right of Way Contract is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract Payee and Reference Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount North Richmond James W. Harvey, August 23, Title Insurance and $67,000.00 By-Pass Trustee 1976 Trust Company Project No. Escrow No. 14Z-191204 0572-4345-663-72 The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw a warrant in the amount specified to be delivered to the County Principal Real Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed from above-named grantor for the County of Contra Costa. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors affixed this 7thday of September . 19 7' cc: County Administrator Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Recorder (Via P. W. ) Byt. , Deputy Clerk Jean L. Killer 000"79 s r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September, T , 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Surety Tax Bond(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the surety tax bond(s) in the amount(s) indicated for the following tract(s) is(are) APPROVED: Tract Bond No. Location Principal No. Amount 4798 Clay-ton Albert D. Seeno _ U 80 64 40 $21,000 Construction Company PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Tax Collector Supervisors with copy of bond(s) affixed thi tsZ h _day o8eptember 1976 J. R. OLSSON. Clerk Deputy Clerk i ine 1.1. I.se e 31 00, 080 r sun= ---..._.._.......__.�_.� �►;:ir.•'a:a„ . .t.gig .. Bond No. U 80 64 40 ! Premium: $210.00 j BOND AGAINST TAXES KNOW ALL I•iEd: BY T:IESE PRESEIdTS: THAT ALBERT D. SEENO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY , -as, principal and (Surety) UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY' , a corporation organized and existin- under the laves of the State of wAsHINGToN j and authorized to transact surety business in California as surety are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra ' Costa, State of California, in the penal sum of TWFAWY ONE THOUSAND AND NO/loo-- - Dollars ($ 21,000.00 ), to be paid to the said,County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which trell and truly to be made, we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed -with our seals and dated this 19th day of AUGUST 19 76 The conditions of the above obligation is such that WHEREAS, the above bounded principal is about to file a map entitled ' TRACT 4798 arid coverinc, a subdivision of a tract of land in said County oi' Contra Costa, and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected a: taxes, against the said Tract of land covered by said map, which-taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, are not as yeL• .due or payable. 1:011, THEREFORE, if the said PRINCIPAL shall pay* all of the taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a ii.en against said tract of land covered by said map, at the' ti„e of the filinG of said map of said Tract, then this obligation. shall be void and of no ef£e f� � �}YELL s it shall re- main in full force and eff �l`B>:RT"D ""N CONSTRUCTION CO. e lienittd partmrship P, E ' BS': ALBERT O.SEENO CONSTpUCTtOH CO.,IMG ' n po/r�B,-Tat i�rtner 1 SEP 1, 1976 KE'1x�5. CO By qL_ Geo AtC±!:i:f`�'`T U. Krueger,A tonne"y rd•-fact r _ State of California } County of C ontra Costa ) County- in t:llicil is tarsen. . On August 19, 1976 , before me, Nancy L. Cloves , a Notary Public, 3n . Zn:i i'ur ;,yid CU;lntj� arid State, personally appcarel George H. ?Srueger knot:n to the to be attorney in tact • of the coI•poration that: executed the wi-h.,In i:i:M-timunt'_and also r-Mat1n to me to be the person Who eXecut-ed it on 1ic•it'11 of .tic.l cc�r;}at . :.01 and ackna:•:led:;e to I:ii;LhaL such torpor:tt:lr�n ex ct;.cc :iCr�launt pur::uant to it:a bfy,•,-l.-n-1. or a rc::cllut3.att Msru -I • NOr!►B r T+lifiLtc•!:• 1%rtr:Jta ` /'`1 i:CYl 1:� C1I11 �'✓ f �� Piimipa(4flrei+CoasriC+:L•t.rMr �1 �1��1�•LU U Sl �lld�'L ) U )1•li'!t :-. . .r. ,svYrIlk •,�� `n:^.t1�' ,Ctr t17t:lT�! I STATE OF CALIFORNIA, �(( 1 Ss UNTY OF CONTRA COSTA t On this _..__2011711 day of.._..AUGUST_ _ 19 76 betore me __.___ . SUE: ROCIIELLE _ , a Notary Public in and for said county and state, personally appeared ALBERT•M SEENO, J3., known to me :o be the Vice President of the corporation Miaofilmed wi that executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation, said corporation being knor:n to me to be one of the partners of ALBERT D. -� SEENO CONSTRUCTION CO., thg partnership that executed the within o F F I r_ A L SLA_ instrument and acknovdeaged to me that such corporation executed the SUE ROCHELLE 't same as such partner and that such p rtnership executed the same. T: k i IMTAi1Ty9t:L—G1l'T''.iiV h / Q COWR;CC>iZ^ ,gy � �.�!1� SUE: ROCEEELLE Notary Public 1 1, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving and Accepting a Right of Entry. Project No. 8521-925-76 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Right of Entry from Pacific, Gas, and Electric Company dated August 26, 1976 for the Olive Drive Storm Drain Project is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said entry on behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: Public Works Director ffi axed this7th day of_SantPmber , 19 76 Flood Control District Real Property Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By -z �'L� p /. Deputy Clerk .Jaen L Miller H..a W76 I'm 00082 R` In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 -. 19 76 In the Matter of Granting Extension of time in which to File the Final Map for Subdivision 4724, in the Diablo area. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of David 0. Isakson for a one-year extension of time in which to file the Final Map for Subdivision 4724, Diablo area, is GRANTED, thereby extending the final filing date to October 14, 1977. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7 day of Sentember 19 71 Orig.: Planning Department cc - David 0. Isakson J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of PlanningBy 'r�,��J LAS Deputy Clerk Public Works Director ;orin�e H-?4 ir(Ow 00083 ... ............... .. a<y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sentember 7 019 76 In the Matter of =,. ort of the Planning Commission o_' the Reauest of :Ar. Edgard F. . _--a, Anolicant, (1997-RZ) to ..ezane Lana in the it Sobrante 111o: Road Pronerties. O::her. The Director of Planning havinv notified this Board that the ?lannin; Commission recommends approval to rezone property frontin approximately 368 feet on the west side of Appian Vay, ap;r3ximately 100 feet south of Argyle Road, El Sobrante area, _.ro= Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to P'ultiple Family Residential District-4 (v,-4), mhich recommendation is a od;'iaation of the rezoning request of sir. Edward P. Biggs (1-197-R'L) for a T:ultiple Family Residential District-3 (€t-3); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, September 23, 1976, at 10:35 a.m. in the Board Chambers, :ooh 107, County Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, '=artinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as rewired by lair in the °•.EST COU;ITY TI.dES. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. .1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and correct copy of an order entered-on the minutes of said Board of supervisors an the date aforesaid ;si Ys Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of _lla�•. Naar? Pro--e--ties supervisors "A-3t of .:a:n�:s m•o ld�ci affixed this 7 day of_ September 19 70' 7lanninr director of Plan::inf; J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ,/.7 '-- Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 00084 fi•�.. :Sn f Resolution No. 54-1976 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE BY EDDIE BIGGS (APPLICANT), WILLOW ROAD PROPERTIES- (OWNER), (1997-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRE- CISE ZONING FOR THE EL SOBRANTE AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by EDDIE BIGGS (Applicant), WILLOW ROAD PROPERTIES (Owner), (1997-RZ), to rezone land in the EI Sobrante Area from Single Family Resident- ial District-7 (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential-3 (M-3), was received in the Planning Department Office on January 18, 1976; and WHEREAS, after notice having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on June 29, 1976 and August 10, 1976, whereat all persons in- terested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was posted on January 15, 1976, for this proposal; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, that the_rezoning request of EDDIE BIGGS (Applicant), WILLOW ROAD PROPERTIES (Owner), be APPROVED as to change from Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District-4 (M-4), in lieu of the applicant's request for M-3 Zoning, and that this zoning change be made as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE DIS- TRICTS MAP FOR THE SOBRANTE AREA, INSERT MAP NO.3, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendation are as follows: (1) Initiation General Plan studies indicate that traffic circulation in this area would be inadequate if the area is ultimately developed to the maximum densities allowed by the zoning code. (2) Subject property consists of a split-level building site bounded on the west by single family development. (3) M-3 Zoning would roughly allow 17 units per acre or approximately 63 units for the study site; M-4 Zoning allows roughly 12 units per acre or approximately 45 units for the study site. (4) Circulation and access to the site is totally inadequate for M-3 density. (5) Physical constraints and topography 000 kf 1 Resolution No. 54-1976 dictates a lower density for proper planning and development. M-4 Zoning would allow for more flexibility in site planning architectural treatment and landscaping. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of this Commission ' shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the some to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, August 10, 1976, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Jeha, Anderson, Walton, Milano, Stoddard. NOES: Commissioners - Compaglia, Young. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. i 1, Andrew H. Young, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, August 17, 1976, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Planning Commission: AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Compaglia, Anderson, Walton, Stoddard, Young. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Richard J. Jeha. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. &16�M11 *-VA . Chairman of the Plann� g Co mission of the County of Contra Costa, Stat of California ATTEST-/ RE C -'A T�,TE D l --� Secret6rj of the Planning Comeiission of the J�County of Contra C6sta, State of California a J. Ouax•t R;rC OhrD Or U i�lLOZS 0VVJ r R_6 Remai n F t I 1 1 � � Co mis�rj theChairman of the Planni 9 Stat o0thia County of Contra Costa, ATTEST: �---� RECL TED -on of as Secretb ofoContraPlanning Stat of'Cali orn a County o -2- IR-61 R-6I �� I }'Remain IRezone I I I ! I ( I ( �W l_ I (: I i.. =800'. From S.To a. - � . Il i } Remain � •.f.j`� :i ��l I I I I III � ( R-10� `Remain ( Remo' Remain 1111 I I .1 / I M3I �I ( IRemain I I Remain I I .��_ • fr Remoin �''✓ 1. �f . tL✓��iR-E3 M-3'i �Remoin� Remoin f t' IDI 1 Remain, ,R7� �Rem ain� {t Y'\ ./Rem � ain Remain I i� ���i� •\ C I T Y OF RICHMOND 1, A. 14. 1-0(JIJ G , Chairman of the Contra Costo County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of A pORT10W OF 7'EIE DISTRICTS MAP FOR TIAL $OBffAtil K AREA_ 114SF-RT E- 1NSI✓RT MAP ISO. 3 indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of V:_pD1C B1('sr�c Chairman of the Contr Costa County Planning Commis ion, St to of Calif. ATTEST_ f�ecrcitory f the� noa Costa unty v Planning Commission, State of Calif. Findings Map y CG. .aA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPART_ _NT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 95l Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415)2AKX�R.gRXF(XRXJ_37,=024 Phone EIR Contact Person Bruce Bowman Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EDDIE BIGGS (Applicant) - WILLOW ROAD PROPERTIES (Owner) - COUNTY FILE: 1997-RZ: An application requesting approval of the rezoning of 3.70 acres from R-7 to m-2. Subject property is described as follows: Front 368± feet on the west side of Appian Way, 75± feet south of Argyle Road in the E1 Sobrante Area. (CT 3630) (Parcel Number 426-250-31) The project will not have a significant effect on the environment because: There are no significant environmental impacts that would appear to result from the proposed use if this rezoning application were approved. however, a General Plan study is now underway for the E1 Sobrante area, and the initial findings of this study indicate that traffic circulation in the E1 Sobrante area would be inadequate if the area was ultimately developed to the maximum densities allowed by the zoning code. Therefore, the County has adopted the policy for the E1 Sobrante Area somewhat less than the maximum allowed. In view of this, M-4 may be a more suitable zoning for this site. This would also allow for more flexibility in site planning, architectural treatments, and landscaping. It•would be very desirable to retain the large trees along Appian Way, and it is assumed--since the trees have survived the gradin.- and leveling of the site--that the applicant is aware of their value, and intends to incorporate them into any future site plan. _- It is determined from initial study by Rn,� Rot, nn of the IPlanning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. IThe Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine 6 Escobar Streets Martinez, California [� Da a Post df\O �� �� �-+ Final date for review/appeal AN• L�ti �91 ' By Planning Departure t Representative AP9 1/74 0008v i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stdte of California September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Membership on the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council This Board having been advised by the Director, Human Resources Agency, that Ms. E. Frances David, representative of the City of Pittsburg, and Mrs. Nancy Thacker, representative of the City of San Pablo replacing John M. Hunt, Jr., have resigned from the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council; and This Board further having been advised that the City of Pittsburg recommends the appointment of Mrs.Mary Erbez to replace Ms. David, and that the City of San Pablo recommends the appointment of Mr. Mike Warren to replace Mrs. Nancy Thacker, said appointments having the concurrence of the Manpower Planning Council and the Director, Human Resources Agency; and The Manpower Planning Council having recognized the high quality of services provided by Ms. David and Mrs. Thacker; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignations of Ms. E. Frances David and Mrs. Nancy Thacker are hereby ACCEPTED with regret and that Certificates of Appreciation be issued. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mrs. Mary Erbez, Civic Center, Post Office Box 1518, Pittsburg 94565, and Mr. Mike Warren, 13817 San Pablo Avenue, San Pablo 94806, are hereby APPOINTED to the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council as representatives of the City of Pittsburg and the City of San Pablo respectively. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Director, HRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Manpower Planning Council Supervisors Ms. E. Frances David affixed this 7th day of September _ 19 76 Mrs. Nancy Thacker /� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Mrs. Mary Erbez � 1 Mr. Mike Warren By. ��` �� Deputy Clerk County Administrator f?ar��Crai County Auditor-Controller County Personnel Director lk 00089 , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 in the Matter of Appointments to Governing Body of the Joint Powers Health Systems Agency. On August 31, 1976, this Board having referred to the Director, Human Resources Agency, a letter from Richard Cabin, Acting Director of the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency, dated August 24, 1976, requesting the Board to nominate six consumer members, three of whom are to be selected by the Joint Powers Governing Board to serve on the Governing Body of the Health Systems Agency; and Mr. Van darter having made his recommendations to the County Administrator on the process to be followed in soliciting names to be considered for submission to the Joint Powers Governing Board in.a memorandum dated September 1, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Information Officer is DIRECTED to conduct a solicitation through an application process, and publicized in the news media, for interested persons to apply for the nominations to said Governing Body of the Health Systems Agency, with all applications received to be referred to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review and report. IT IS FURTHER, ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Government Operations Committee pending receipt of the report from the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED ON September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7th day of September, 19 76 /) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By `�t<,-"�.r:i�% , Deputy Clerk VaT'r Craig Orig: Human Resources Agency Richard Cabin, Acting Director, HSA Alameda County Board of Supervisors William Zion County Administrator Board Coranittee 00090 m Human Resources Agency Date September 1, 1976 CONTRAntroOUNTY s County Arthur G. Will RECEIVED To County Administrator RECEIVED SEP - i 1976 -aro( SEP Office of From C. L. Van Marter, Director unty Administrator J. a civ C1ERlc BOA A O' SUPEWIS02S Subj APPOINTMENTS TO GOVERNING BODY '� c I co. JOINT POWERS HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENC -.00 On August 31, 1976, the Board of Supervisors referred to me a letter from Richard Cabin, Acting Director of the Joint Powers Health Systems Agency, asking that the Board nominate six consumer members to the Health Systems Agency Governing Body. It would be appropriate for you to place on your agenda for September 7 a recommendation that the Board direct that the following process be followed in making these nominations: 1. The Public Information Officer should see that the availability of these positions is publicized widely, 2. Persons interested in being considered for nomination by the Board should be asked to contact Mrs. Dunten for an application form. 3. The application form should be returned to my office for review. Because of strict federal definitions of what constitutes a consumer, it is necessary to insure that applicants are in fact consumers. In addition, certain economic, racial, sex, age, and geographical considerations must be observed in making nominations. 4. The Board should place this matter in the Government Operations Committee with the understanding that I will report to the committee all persons who applied, along with my recommenda- tions as to whom the Board should nominate. 5. The Government Operations Committee, after considering my report, should report back to the Board the slate of six nominees they wish to see considered for the Health Systems Agency Governing Body, from whom the Joint Powers Governing Board will select three. I will be happy to work closely with Mrs. Dunten to ensure that we get a good cross section of the community's input. CLVM:cig cc: Mary Dunten, Public Information Officer r` Microfilmed with bo0o d 091 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . 1976 In the Matter of Diablo Valley College Use of Probation Space IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Diablo Valley College is AUTHORIZED to use classroom facilities at the Probation Department office at 2525 Stanwell Drive, Concord, for evening classes in correctional case work, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on Monday and Tuesday evenings, during the period September 13, 1976 through January 25, 1977. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: County administrator Supervisors CC: Probation Officer affixed this7th day of_3euter..ber _ 1976 Public Norks Director Diablo Valley College Attn: Dr. C. K. Sapper �i' J. R. OLSSON. Clerk Associate Dean, By Wil'%cei 'i-:moi . Deputy Clerk Evening Education 00092 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of ' John F. Kennedy University, School of Law, Use of Courtroom Space IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that- John F. Kennedy University, School of Law, is AUTHORIZED to use courtroom facilities (Superior Court, Department 6) for classroom sessions on oral arguments on selected weekday evenings through September 16, 1976, subject to conditions imposed by the Superior Court Administrator. Passed by the Board on Septerber ?, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig- County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervisor CC,. John F. Kennedy affixed this 7th day of September 1976 University _ Public tiorks Director Superior Court Administrator �a-ea f� J. R. OLSSON, Clark By �/ %c�� Deputy Clerk Ural�� 00093 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California In the Matter of Seating of a Class III Representative on the Economic Opportunity Council of Contra Costa County IT IS BY TILE BOARD ORDERED that the vacant Class III seat on the Economic Opportunity Council of Contra Costa County be filled by the 50 Plus Club of Pittsburg as recommended by the Economic Opportunity Council. PASSED by the Board an September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enterers on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Cris;. Dent. : OEO Supervisors cc: Economic Onportuni ty affixed this 7th day of September lg 76 Council /J J. R. OLSSON, Clerk 50 Plus Club of Pittsburg, Byc/o OEM F Deputy Clerk County Administrator 00094 i l i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 1976 In the Molter of Authorization to Negotiate Lease with Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church, Richmond to conduct Food Stamp sales by Brinks, Inc. A memorandum report dated September 1, 1976 from the Director. Human Resources Agency, having been received by the Board through the Office of the County Administrator advising that as part of a statewide withdrawal banks are discontinuing food stamp sales in Contra Costa County, leaving only one main post office facility as a food stamp vendor in downtown Richmond; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Department is AUTHORIZED to negotiate a lease for space in the Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church Parsonage at 169 6th Street, Richmond, for use by Brinks, Inc. of San Francisco in conducting a food stamp sales and check cashing outlet, said lease to become effective as early in September as is feasible. PASSED ON September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7th day of September, 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Orig: Human Resources Agency Mal�.4,i Crau�� Director, Social Service Public Works Department County Administrator County Auditor 000 L) i ------------------------ _ r to the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 _ 1976 In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of Grant for Provision of Head Start Services to Handicapped Children IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of a Grant from the Department. of Health, Education and Welfare in the amount of $37,700 to provide Head Start Services to Handicapped Children is hereby acknowledged. PASSID by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7tt, day of •"entenber. 19 7f J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Original: Office of Economic By / .` /'/ Deputy Clerk Opportunity ""r" rr,-{ cc: County Auditor Controller County Administrator 00096 k i is DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,EDUCATION.AND WEL FAR& Office of Hunun De"lopment NOTICE OF GRANT AWARDED 1. GRANTING OFFICE 2.CATALOG NO 3.GRANT NO. S.AMEND.NO. _Office of Child Development 13.600 H-0375 K/H6 b.TYPE OF GRANT AWARDED G.BUDGET PERIOD: .. . + U„dm Authority of P.L. 93-644 Title if CSA and subject FRoM 01-01-76 THROUGH 12-31_76 to Pertinent DHFW&OHD Regutations;oC Pohcies Applicable to: 7.TOTAL PROJECT PERIOD: 1ndeL inita (3 RESEARCH GRANt U DEMONS-1 RATION GRANT FROST THROUGH K TYPE OF GRANT COMPETING ❑TRAINING GRANT ❑SERVICE GiIANT NEN/ 13 EXTENSION ❑CONTINUATION J@ SUPPLEMENT :7 OTHER Ilandicap_ped Grant D REVISION FOR( )See Reverse for explanation lspe«.'1•} 9.PROJECT/PROGRAM TITLE Full Year/Head Start/Part Day Head Start 1Q.GRANTEE ORGANIZATION 11.PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR OR PROGRAM DIRECTOR Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Myron W. Flock, Head Start Director 1157 Thompson Street 13.CONGIL DISTRICT 14.COUNTY Martinez, California 94553 07 and 08 Contra Costs 15.AWARD COMPUTATION 12.APPROVED BUDGET A.TOTAL FEDERAL APPROVED BUDGET ......S 5612595 PERSONNEL.......................S 52,392 B.UNDaLIGATED BALANCE FROM - FRINGE BENEFITS .................. 9,544 PRIOR BUDGET PERIOD(s) ..............3 13,374 TRAVEL.......................... 1,400 C.TOTAL AMOUN T AWARDED THIS EQUIPMENT ................. ..... 1,659 BUDGET PERIOD ....................5 548,221 ' SUPPLIES ................... .. .. 2,962 CONTRACTUAL 465,872 01 HER 27,458 16. ........$enavatiQnA Repairs.... 308 A.SIOUNTAWARDED-THIS ACTION s 37,700 - TRAINEE STIPENDS (No. ) .......... ' DEPENDENCY ALLOWANCE......... .... 17. This Will correct TOTAL G RANTES PARTIC SPAT I Or) ....... $136,392 . TRAINEE TUITION 6 FEES ............ -"t1Qn-federal share. $194,071 DIRECT COSTS .................... $ 561,595 1&SUPPO. RECOMMENDED FOR REMAINDER OF PROJECT PERIOD INDIRECT COSTS.................... ,. CALCULATED AT_%OF $ PERIOD TOTAL FEDERAL COSTS TOTAL FEDERAL APPROVED BUDGET> S 561,595 19.REMARKS (See Terms and Special Conditions attahced) This action is a handicapped grant in the amount of $37,700 PY 176 PYE 12/31/76, 20. CAN NO. 21. APPROP,tJO. 22.APPLICANT EIN 6-1094126 7560136 1-94-6002509111 23. OBJECT CLASS 24.PAYEE EIN 41.91 Same as C22 24. S17 stun•�:OHO GRANTSOFFICER DATE L7.SIGN' i1 E.l.::fy/�f7/LL--PKG^RA OPI ICIRL��, Normal K. Acting Direct-or, OG I F 7L v>sutra� j� S b. 5 tufe.CERTIFYING OFFICER ATE DATE l E ?•filler, I 1 , Samuel , Director, OCD ' tte Lutjens, Budget Analyst`�ItU .f(,/ FORM HD-IU_ )-�z.�:vrar: (xsT(�uTlo:+) hl:uofifmrci �l 1 t��rd s APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 76061502 (NONCONSTRUCTION PROGRAAS) Aaa1:c.r.wpps.c..i•.r:> PART S �. If 0375 K ]. F-d«.I r...+v Aa-..c, COiUIV% COSTA COUN-I Tiepa_tient of Health, Education, BO.Utir.J' OF SUPERVISORS ana Welfare O•yw.:.ww.at u..:. O.p.n.•...Di.i.:w. Office of Hu=an D=velo=ent ' A,I-W i..011K- $....win...•- 50 Fulton. Street Martinez Contra Costa 5.....Adb...-F.(L a.. Ci., C.....r, . San Francisco, CA 94102 California 94553 COY 5.... Zip Coi. 5.... Zip Cod. Head Start - Services to Handicapped Children e. r.i...l c..P.p :. 7. F.i..ol Fwdry R.ov....d 13.600 137,700 9. T,p..r Aa�r R-1 D.1...CA..p..(Snot A,) 1G.T,p.d w..:...... - 1 -.—i,F-.-f:Nwp Le.++w.P..J..r .1 P,.,-ct 100 Indefinite - i 1«C..v...i...-1 D:...:cr U.B.J:.n:+,Ow. { v 07 September 1, 119?W* !ti U6 15.Ua..os Appt:c.ri— June 22, 1976 16_Ti..sppl--c.n:1:...h.r 1-tA.1-•+.0 Ai.L-1.49- .j"U.i tin da.t...hi."Plie..:--t....aro e.►..c.,e.d that h..;It.—Pi, ..hh tA-a.-aeh.d o•w...c..i£I....e-:.-.+h.p.w... i{{ - 1 . t I 7 Tol. ' T.I.phw.-ts—b-. James P. Kenny Chairman .■c.cont .�.un or. j Sig-0; Peggy Salvador, Pol c Council Cilaizpers Ott H 608 T � (` Judy Ann *tiller, Executive Director'`�.`_l^c% 0 00098 '1 P PART 11 o»w>+a.:ana tss I PROJECT APPROVAL 114FORiAATION f Item 1. Dees this ossi stance request require State,10:01, Noma of Governing Sody regional,or w6er priority rating? Priority Rating Yes ` No ' It—2. Does this assistzrce request require State,or local Name of AV*ncy or advisory,educational or health clearances? Board J Yes ?� No {Arracit Documentation} ~ r Item 3. Does ibis asci%?e.-oce request require clearinghouse {Attach Comments} teview in accordcnc_-with OMB Circular A-95? Yes Ho Item d. { Does this assi sr`nce request require Stat*, local, Nass of Approving Agency i regional or other pl_vting approval? Date Yes ` 5. Is tie proposed roieet covered by an approved compre- Check one: State 0 henslve plan? Laval Regional O Yes No Location of Pion Item 6. Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Nome of Federal Installation installation? Yes No Federal Papulation benefiting fron Project Item 7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or Nome of Federal Installation installation? X Lavation of Federal Land Yes N2 Percent of Project Item 8. Will the ossistance requested have an impact or ef6ct Sao instructions for additional iniarmarion to be ; on the environment? provided. 1 i Yes X No r ` r Item 9. Number of: Will the assistance r p # requested cause the dis locemenl Individuals i of individuals,families,businesses,or farms? Families T Businesses Yes No Forms Item 10. Is there other related assistance on this project prr•viou:. See instructions for odditional irf0r-ration to be pending,or anticipated? provided. Yes h NO 00099 . . . . . . y»yy«. . . . . ... . . _ . . ... . _. ..�\ g | � 2 ƒ 2 , / $ /` | © - ' • �• - • | � . . � 7k-11 { k k us f- } - / \ k k \ « T. _ -4 2 ƒ / § , Ik \ / \ � 7 e / f ; § , 2 . . - - ;L. r-ƒ \ Z k� . c \ \ \\ | | 2 ® ` | ! o cn en _ ! a n . n _ | . | - f ZZb.! 2 - \ 2� \ iz . 00100 . Contra Costa Count; Board ol auper:isors" F: 0375 K c f G O y G r t+ U W °, - 4a U LL2 a O U U < 1-+ s -j u; O W fr c it Ucc + i U C3 4J ^ u it; I7 f7tf, ULnLL. M [$ t r { u •rt CO tt G C .J = .. U.--i O U O CS U U n = 2 G > N U = ci 4 U O :... a.r G TZ 4n w „ Lu eo o o U ; to o' ts. C ^ . 14 LU ti h N d r 14 G t1] u 1 v Z .Y Iz LU �= v a U -4 O O Lr. N R' _ LU Le 0 0 . 1 F- Z cri c^u •� > Tc.s � UJ u V . to M _ _u•,-f 1-f G +f .. . 1 LU f� C7 G^ ,-f LU Ll .J Q o LL tt G1 N G U iJ 4 q < L Lu4ll t'1 ..L 1+. �,+" = CL' E U G Cil Ln U ,� Gv r14 cam: < LLi - _; L.e^! C? 3+ L! u ^w -rf rf a < U G1 _ .1«F LO trr r-f G. O C_J i Z V C G O LU v4•a ° . � U rr �- GS o F F :.j G t" > .n t°i n rn n N 7 t°G Qi r "L.' LSJ u .. G L q -;3 Ll. I-- a+ .c.+ U U •*+ O U co LLL C'1 L% N :J &nO G CJ U ^ CO a :.r to to U •O r' U - ^ G•ri 7 U M U rt ri G LU p cz G 4 ^ > G 34 L G 11 Z +f U U Cr, cc u Q ° r. U .- cn av).v as E s r 00101 .-,"Aug" PART V ASSURANCES -he Appixan:hereby assures and eertifias that h_will comply with the regulations,policies,guidelines,and requirements including MOB Circulars Nos.A-87,A-95,and A-102,as they relate to the application,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this Federa!ly assistttd project.Also the Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: - 1. It possesses Ieml authority to apply for the grant;that a 4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions resolu:ion, motion or similar actizn has been duly of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property i adopted or passed as an ofircial act of the applicant's Acquisitions Act of 1970(P.L 91.646)which provides Governing body,authorizing the filing of the application, for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a including all understandings and assurances contained result of Federal and federally assisted programs. therein, and directing and authorizing the person identi- S. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act tied as the official representative of the applicant to act which limit the political activity of employees. in connection with the application and to provide such 6. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum additional infor:zation as may be required hours provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards 2. It w';; comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of Act,as they apply to hospital and educational instiw- 1964 1P.—I. 833521 and in accordance with Title VI of tion employees of State and local governments. : that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the 7 It well establish safeguards to prohibit employees from ground of race, elDr, or national origin, be excluded using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the trom paricipa:ion iZ be denied the benefits of,or be appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with otherwise subiec-= to discrimination under any pro- whom they have family,business,or other ties. t gram or activity lar which the nppIicani receives Federal g It will give the grantor agency or the Comptroller Geer t` financial assistant e:d will immediately take any mea- ' sures necessary t:,Y acriate this aper meet oral through any authorized representative the access to and the right to examine a!1 records,books,papers,or 3 It will eornply w^TiJe VI of the Civil Rights Act of documents related to the grant 1964 (47 USC::l7f+c+prohibiting employment discrimi- 9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the nation .where 11) =-.e F::mary purpose of a grant is to Federal grantor agency concerning special requirements j provide employmer^_or(2)discriminatory employment of law, program requirements,and other administrative practices wi!I rs;h in unequal treatment of persons who requirements approved in accordance with Office of are or should be b---tefiting from the grant-aided activity. Management and Budget Circular No.A-102. I i . E j i 00102 Contra Costa Speech Pathologist/Parent Aides Special•Conditions: 1. The grantee is to use this grant in the amount of $30,000 to hire for one (1) year, on a full time basis, one (1) trained, professionally qualified Speech Pathologist who has worked -with young children and have certi_ication and/or licensure is that speciality area. 2. The Speech Pathologist shall have a minimum of an H.A. degree with evidence of specialized training, and experiences in clinical language services for the purposes of evaluating comaunication behavior and for devising intervention programs for those children found to have special needs in language. 3. Two (2) Spanish speaking parents, with children currently enrolled in Head Start, shall be paid limited stipends to assist the Speech Pathologist in the Language Assessments of Spanish-speaking children in Head Start and appropriate parent education projects. 4. The Grantee shall submit a quarterly financial and progress report to Region IX, OCD, on duties and activities performed by the Speech Pathologist. 5. Prior to the expiration of the Grantee's Program-year-end, the Grantee must apply to OCD on forms 608T for reprograming these funds through their next program year. 6. The Grantee is authorized to use a maximum of $100.00 for procuring an audit of these funds. 7. The Grantee is to utilize this grant to serve its program exclusively. z . B. The Grantee is responsible for selection of personnel, submission of required reports, and the fiscal operations of the grant including the required 20% local share. 9. These funds are made available for the specific purposes of providing services to handicapped children in Head Start. There will be no automatic future entitlement of such funds. These funds are included as a part of the discretionary reserve and need.not necessarily be distributed to the same Grantees or states in future years. i i 00103 ...tip. . t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Revision of 1976-1977 Area Plan and Budget, Area Agency on Aging. As recommended by the Contra Costa County Council on Aging and by the Director, Human Resources Agency, in his report dated August 25, 1976 to the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the revision to the 1976-1977 Area Plan and Budget of the Area Agency on Aging for the period July 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977 is hereby APPROVED, said Area Plan having a total budget of $415,244, which includes carryover funds of $34,081 under Federal Title III, and a County local share of $3,658 to be funded out of the Social Service Department's existing budget for fiscal year 1976-1977, and an increased State allocation of $46,882, with no additional County funds to be appropriated. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to submit the revision of the Area Plan to the State Office on Aging for approval. PASSED M SEPTEMBER 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor affixed this 7th day of Senterrbcr 19 7(7 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Orig: Human Resources Agency State Office on Aging County Welfare Director Attn Mort Elkins County Council on Aging County Administrator County Auditor-Controller 00104 County Administrator Contra Board of Supervisors James P.Kenny COs}^ tst District County Administration Building `d Alfred 61.Din Martinez.California 94553 County 2nd District (415)372-4080dunes E.6toriarty ani District Arthur G.Will Warren N.Boggess County Adminisxator 4th District AMU- A // Edmund A.Linsclteid l" 5th District I Y t� To: Board of Supervisors Date: September 7, 1976 From. Arthur G. Will, Subject: Revised Area Agency County Administrator on Aging Plan and Budget Submitted for your consideration today is a revision of the 1976-1977 Area Plan and Budget of the Area Agency on Aging for the period July 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977, to include $80,963 of additional Federal Title III Funds made available to the County for this program. The increase consists of $34,081 in carry-over funds from fiscal year 1975-1976 and a $46,882 allocation increase for fiscal year 1976-1977. Both amounts require a local share. The Social Service Department proposes to meet the local share requirement as follows: Federal Local Funds Amount Share Amount FY 1976-77 $46,882 To be provided by $5,210 Allocation Increase contractors FY 1975-76 34,081 To be transferred 3,658 Carry-over from cost center 501 $80,963 $8,868 Action today is recommended because of a deadline (originally September 1, 1976) for application for the additional funds involved_ RA:lk RECEIVED SEP `I 1976 J. R, Ct550r, CL:ZK 60.i:� CY 00105 Microfilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Senterber 7 , 19 In the Matter of AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING Approving Contract Documents BOARD OF THE RIVERVIEW FIRE Submitted by the Riverview PROTECTION DISTRICT OF Fire Protection District CONTRA COSTA COUNTY The County Administrator having presented to the Board contract documents (Notice to Contractors, Contract, Abatement Specifications and Proposal) submitted by the Riverview Fire Protection District for the abatement of weeds, rubbish and other fire hazard conditions within the district for the period of November 1, 1976 through October 31, 1977; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid documents are APPROVED and September 28, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. is FIXED as the time to receive bid proposals for performance of said work; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish the Notice to Contractors for the time and in the manner as required by law in the "Contra Costa Times." Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig- County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Riverview Fire affixed this 7th day of September. 19 76 Protection District County Auditor-Controller County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk "ia-y Cr?.f �, t 00106 "F RECEIVED 5 E F 7 1970 I R. CLSSan Notice to Contractors CLERK °D^'D OF=Urzvuou f7ar.�Ki, .h to Notice is hereby given by order-of the Board-of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as :the Governing-Board-of the Riverview— - Fire Protection District, -that Clerk of said Board will receive.. _ bids for the abating of weeds, rubbish and other fire hazard conditions within the Riverview Fire Protection District boundaries and under its jurisdiction for the period of November 1, 1976 thru October 31, 1977. Each bid is to be in accordance with thla Abatement Specifica- tions relating thereto which are on file at the Riverview Fire Protection District Office, 315 0. 10th Street, Antioch, Calif. 94509. The Abatement Specifications and related contract documents may be examined at 'and obtained by prospective bidders from the above-mentioned District Office. Each bid shall be made on a Bid Proposal form to be obtained at the District Office and must be accompanied by a certified or cashier's check or checks, or bid bond in the amount of ten percent (107.)'of the base bid amount,' made-payable to the order of "Riverview- Fire Protection District". The above-mentioned bid security shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a Contract if awarded the work, and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by the County if the successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Contract or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to do so by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. Bid Proposals shall be sealed and filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Room 103, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, on or before September 28, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. and will be opened in public and at the time due in the Board of Supervisors' Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Contra Costa County, California, and there read and recorded. Any Bid Proposals received after the time specified in this Notice will be returned unopened. No more than one (1) bid bill be accepted from any one individual or firm. The successful bidder will be required to furnish a labor and materials bond in an amount equal to one hundred -percent of the contract price and a faithful performance bond ii► an amount equal to one hundred percent of the contract price, said bonds to be secured from a surety company authorized to do business in the State of California. Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, or local law applicable thereto, the said Board has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and rates for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which-.this work is to be performed for each type of workman or mechanic required to execute the contract which will be awarded to the ;•:ccessful bidder. The prevailing rate of per diem wages is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervi- sors, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto, the same as if set forth in full herein. For any classification ret included in the list, the minimum wage shall be the general prevailing rate for the county. 00, 107 Microfilmed with board order The said Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids or any portion of any bid and/or waive any-irregularity in any bid received. By Order of the Board of Supervisors of"Contra Costa County as the Governing Body of the Riverview Fire Protection District J. R. OLSSON _ County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the BBoard of supervisors } B3 r `� ►^ F Deputy DATED- Senterber 7, 1976 PUBLICATION DATES- (MS-C- 13885) Sentember 11;, 1976` . Sentember 22, 1976 i i. f t i 1 REK:bw -2- 00108 �- E l V h yTE:�IT CONTRACT '`'' ED (Agreement) C�a 976 cialc Ep..'.7 Ci Sl:�c�Yt ZS I. SPECIAL TER Z. These special terms are incorporated %R1 co;:,�Co. a rporated .. -�---_ _c.2-ago,,, reference. (Public Agency) Riverview Fire Protection District (Contractor) • - s 02) F..rECTM DATE:-__ :" (see §4 for starting date.) 03) THE I-DR t: The Contractor gill at its o:rn cost and expense, in a workman- like rznner-, faithfully and fully do all the work and furnish all the equipment and materials necessary to complete, in accordance with the Abatement Specifications and related contract documents hereinafter mentioned, to the satisfaction of the ice Chief of the Public Agency, the correction and abatement of fire hazards from the properties set forth by the Public agency. 04) COMPIXTION TRT.: The i:oek shall be completed as set forth by the Public Agency in Orders to be issued. (§5) P'JBL?'C 41rriCY'S AGENT: Fire Chief of the Public Agency. � (§6) CONTRACT PRICE: $ (for unit price contracts: more or less, in accordance -.zth finished quantities at unit bid prices.) 2. SIGkkTUR;S & AC1210 I DsM10T. PUBLIC AGEK'CY. By: (President, Cnairran or Other ,Designated Representative) (Secretary) CONTRACTOR, heraby also acimo:4ledging awareness of and compliance with Labor Code §1961 concerning T•ioelaaen's C_ompensatioa Law. By: Designate official capacity in the business) (CORPORAT$ SFAL) Designate official capacity in the business (NOTE TO CONTRACTOR (1) 'BMUTa ACn•1OWLEM- EMNU FORM BELOW AIM (2) if a cam.:L4Tim, AFFIX CORpmazT SAL.) - --- --- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - State of California AC1u1O ME-DOMENT (by Corporation, County of j ss' Partnership, or Indivisual) The persons) signing above for Contractor, kno:.-n to me in individual and business capacity as stated, personally appeared before me today and - % acknowledged that he/they executed it and that the corporation or partner- # ship named above executed it. '► Dated: 1 11MAY PUBLIC- - - - - - - - 1ORM APPROVED: J. B. CLA'J3E."1 By: County Cou*-sel Deputy 1Vtiaofilmed viith kc0U1d9 3. WORK CONTRACT,- CHANCES. (a) By their signatures in Section 2, effective on the above date, these parties promise and agree as set forth in this contract,-incorporating by these references the material ("special terms") in Sec. 1. (b) Contractor shall, at his own cost and expense, and in a vorl=anlile canner, fully and faithfully perform and complete the work; and ' .will-furnish all materials,-labor.,-services and transportation-necessary,- convenient and proper in order fairly to perform the requirements of this contract, all strictly in accordance with the Public-Agency's l.otice'To Contractors, Proposal, Orders, and Abatement Specifications: (e) The work can be changed only with Public Agency's prior written order specifying-such change and its cost agreed to by the parties; and the Public-Agency shall never - f have to pay sore than specified in Sec. 7 without such an order. !� 4. TM: NOTICE TO PROCEED. Contractor shall start this work as directed in the Orders and shall complete it as specified in See. 1. 5: INTEGRATED DOM-r-ETTS. - The Notice To Contractors, Proposal, Orders and - Abatement Specifications or special provisions of the Public Agency's call for •` bids, and Contractor's accepted bid for-this work are hereby-incorporated into this contract, and they are intended 'to co-operate, so that anything exhibited in the Notice To Contractors, Proposal, and Orders not mentioned in the Abate- trent Specifications or special provisions, or vice versa, is to be executed as if exhibited, mentioned and set forth in both, to the true intent and meaning thereof when taken all together; and differences of opinion concerning these shall be finally deter--iaed by Public Agency's Agent specified in Sec. I. . 1 6. PAYMENT. For his strict and literal fulfillment of these promises and � ! conditions, end as full compensation for all this twork, the Public Agency shall !, pay the Contractor the sum specified in Sec. 1, except that in this unit price contract,the payment shall be for finished quantities (parcels) at unit.-bid prices. 7. PARI NTS WITRHSD. - (a) The Public Agency or its agent may withhold any pay--=nt, •or because of later discovered evidence nullify all or any certificate for payment, to such extent and period of time only as may be necessary to protect the Public Agency from loss because of: (1) Defective work not remedied, or uncompleted work, or (2) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing; or (3) Failure to properly pay subcontractors or for material or labor, or (4) Reasonable doubt that the cork can be completed for the balance then unpaid, or • - (5) Damage to another contractor, or (6) Damage to the Public Agency, other than damage due-to-delay. (b) The Public Agency shall use reasonable diligence to discover and report to the Contractor, as the -_oak progresses, the materials and labor which are not to it, so as to avoid unnecessary trouble or cost to the Contractor in .skin& goad any defective work or parts. (c) 35 calendar days after the Public Agency files its notice of completion of the entire work, it shall issue a certificate to the Contractor and pay the balance of the contract price after deducting all amounts withheld under this contract, provided the Contractor shows that all claims for labor and =_terials have been paid, no claims have been presented to the Public Agency based on acts or omissions of the Contractor, and no liens or withhold notices have been filed against the work or site, and provided there are not reasonable indications of defective or missing work or of late-recorded notices of liens or claims against Contractor, but in no case shall this be done prior to October 31, of the year in which the work has been completed. 00110 k� (k( ESI ro , t 'III • 1 8. INSURANCE. (Labor Code §91860-61) On signing this contract, contractor asst give Public Agency'(1) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or (2) a certificate of Workmen's Compen- sation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (3) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. Contractor is aware of and ' complies with Labor Code Sec. 3700 and the Workmen's Compensation Lay. 9. BOYDS. 0a signing this contract, Contractor shall deliver to Public Agency for approval good and sufficient bonds with sureties, in amount(s) specified in the specifications or special provisions, guaranteeing his faithful performacce of this--contract and his payment for all labor and =aterials hereundeif. 10. FAILURE 10 PERFMM. If the Contractor at any time refuses or neglects, vithout fault of the P- :blic Agency or its agent(s), to supply sufficient materials or u-oti-^ea to complete this agreement and %.ork as provided herein; for a period of 10 days or core after written notice thereof by the Public Agency, the Public Agency may furnish same-and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the:Eontract price. The Public Agency may terminate this contract by registered _ rail where the Contractor fails to provide sufficient workmen and equipment as previously ordered. The Public Agency's determination shall be final and conclusive as to sufficiency of workmen and equipment. 11. LATIS APPLY. General. Both'parties recognize the applicability of various federal, state and local lags and•1egu2ation3, especially Chapter 1 of Part 7 of the California Labor Code (beginning with Sec. 1720, and including Secs. 1735, 1777.5, & 1777.6 for bidding discrimination) and intend that this contract complies therewith. The parties specifically stipulate that the relevant penalties and forfeitures provided-in the Labor Code, especially in Secs. 1775 6 1813, concerning prevailing -.ages and hours, shall apply to this contract as though fully stipulated herein. ! 12. SUBCONTRACTORS. Government Code 604100-4113 are incorporated herein. 13. WAGE RA:ES. (a) Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1773, the governing body of th; Public Ageacy has ascertained the general prevailing rates of wages per diem. aad for holiday and overt{l_-e•work, in the locality in rhich this work is to be perfor~ed, for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to exetute this contract, and said rates are as specified in the call for bids for this work and are on file with the Public Agency, and are hereby incorpor- ated°herein. (b) This schedule of wages is based on a vorking day of 8 hours unless otherwise specified; and the daily rate is the hourly rate multiplied by the ==ber of hours constituting the corking day. When less than that number of hours are corked, the daily wage rate is proportionately reduced, but the hourly rate renins as stated. I (c) The Contractor, and all his subcontractors, cast pay at least thass rate9 to ril perron7 on this xnrl:, ircludinZ all trcvel, =•bcict_ncc, t friuza baaaiit payments provided for by applicable collective bargaining agree- { seats. All skilled labor not listed above Host be paid at least the wage scale established by collective bargaining agreement for such labor. in the locality where such work is being performed. It if becomes necessary for the Contractor or any subcontractor to employ any person in a craft, classification or type of urork (except executive, supervisory, ad--inistrative, clerical or other non r-nual vorlers as such) for which no minimum wage rate is specified, the Contrac- tor shall mediately notify the Public Agency s.•hich shall pro=tly determine the prevailing wage rate therefor and furnish the Contractor with the aril—n { rate based thereon, which shall apply from the time of the initial employment j of the person affected and duricg the conti==ce of such employment. I 14. MMS OF LABOR.' Eight hours of labor in one calendar day ca stitutea a legal day's work, and no workman employed at any time on this work by the Co-_— tractor or by any subcontractor shall be repaired or permitted to work longer thereon except as provided in Labor Code Seca. 1810-1815. 00111 15. APPM-110ES. Properly indentured apprentices may be Toyed on thin cork in accordance With Labor Code Secs. 1777.5 and X777.6, forbidding dia- criminstioa. 16. PP=--a- M! FOR MILTMIALa. The Public Agency desires to promote the I industries and economy of Contra Costa County, and the Contractor thorefors promises to use the products, workmen, laborers and rachanics of this County in every case ubera the price, fitness and quality are equal. " 17. ASSIM-LENT. This agre—cat binds the heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives of the Contractor; but he cannot assign it in'-.whole or is part, nor my monies due or to become due under it, without the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the Contractor's surety or suraties, unless they have i:aived notice of assign-tet. 18. NO WAIM BY PUBLIC AGENCY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials Inspected, or statement by any officer, went or employee of the Public Agency indicating the work or any part thareof complies with the requirements of this contract, or acceptance of the rhols or any part of said work end/or materials, cr paymeats therefore, or any com- bination of these acts, shall not relieve tLa Contractor of his obligation to fulfill thio contract as prescribad; nor shell the Public Agcacy be thereby ' cotopped from bringing any action for dtmsges or enforcement arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 19. HOLD H.4R*=- S B 72ZD MTY. (a) Contractor promises to cnd shall hold ;+� harmleas and inderrify frog the liabilities as defined in this section. (b) The inde--iftees benefited end protected by this pro=ise are the Public ASeacy and its elective and appointive boards, cam issio=a, officer*' , agents end e=ployees. _ (c) The liabilities protected cgairs t are any liability or claim for da-nge of cay kind a.Ue;edly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined belcrr, including personal injury, death, property damage, invorse conde=--ation, or tay combination of these, regardless or u1nothar or not suds liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at nay tine before: the Public AScncy approved the improverent plan or accepted the i.-proveaeats as co--plat- ed, -End including the defense of any suit(s) or action(s) at law or equity i concerning these. (d) The actions causing liability ere any act or amission (negligent or nam-negligent) fa coa:.ecticu with the ratters covered by this contract and attributable to the contractor, aub contractor(a), or any officar(s), agcat(s) or caployee(s) of one or more of then. (e) hon-Conditions: The prcmi9e and acres-=t in this s^__ticn is zot cescitiea=:: or hep,—:dent on ubeth_r or not ray Ind—itca has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s),drering(a), specification(s) or spacial provision(s) in connection with this work, has insurance or other ind—ifi- cation covering any of these matters, or that tha alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Inde=aitee. rK� 00112 ABATEMENT SPECIFICATIONS 1976 J. R. C[SSON • CI�ER�<g0.7ARD OF 5L� SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT 1. The Riverview Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County, hereinafter referred to as the Public Agency, is in the process of notifying the-owners of over 1500 properties which may require the correc- tion and abatement of fire hazards. Those properties that have not been corrected and abated by the owners will be abated under orders of the Public Agency. Approximately 700 properties are abated annually. 2. The abatement contract for the period November 1, 1976, through October 31, 1977, will be awarded on the basis of the lowest composite bid and proven ability, dependability, and responsibility. The successful bidder shall be compensated for that work completed at the rate specified for that type of work supplied on the bid proposal. Excluding the types of work to be done on an hourly basis, unit prices are to be based upon _ the abatement work being done twice per year per parcel. 3. A copy of the abatement contract which the successful bidder will be riquired to execute, can be inspected at the Public Agency office, 315 West Tenth Street, Antioch, California. 4. Bids will be publicly opened by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and it is expected that they will be presented to the Adminis- trator of the Public Agency for review. The Administrator of the Public Agency is the Fire Chief of the Riverview Fire Protection District, • hereinafter referred to as the Fire Chief. The Fire Chief will recommend to the Board of Supervisors (Governing Body of the Public Agency) to award the contract to the lowest composite bidder of proven ability, dependability, and responsibility. S. This Abatement Specifications document is intended to cooperate with the Notice to Contractors, Contract, Proposal, and Orders as discussed herein, so that anything exhibited in the Notice to Contractors, Contract Proposal, and Orders not mentioned in the Abatement Specifications is to be considered as if exhibited, mentioned, and set forth herein. SECTION B- GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Before any work is commenced on this contract and within ten (10) calendar days after the date of award, the successful bidder shall furnish to the Public Agency evidence of: a. Workmen's Comoensation Insurance. The contractor shall maintain adequate Workmen's Compensation Insurance under the laws of the State of California, for all labor employed by him or by any subcontractor under him, who may come within the protection of such Workmen's Compensation Laws of the,State of California, and shall provide, where practicable, employers' general liability insurance for -the benefit of his employees and the employees of anv subcontractor under him, not protected by such compensation laws, and proof of such insurance, satisfactory to the Public Agency shall be given by filing certificates of such insurance with the Public Agency, in form satisfactory to said Public Agency. If such insurance is underwritten by any agency other than the State Compensation Fund, such agency shall be a company authorized to do business in the State of California- b. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance. The contractor shall, in addition, take out and shall furnish satisfactory proof, by certifi- cate or otherwise, as may be required, that he has taken out public liability and property damage insurance with an insurance company, complying with the requirements herein set forth and satisfactory to the Public Agency, and such form as shall be satisfactory to the Public Agency to protect said contractor and the Public Agency, its officers, employees or agents, against loss from - 1 - • with bo order M,Uofiimea 00113 liability imposed.by lav, for damages on account of bodily injury, including death resulting therefrom, suffered or alleged to have been suffered by any person or persons, other than employees, resulting directly or indirectly from the performance or execution of this contract or any subcontract there- under, and, also to protect said contractor and the Public Agency, its officers, employees or agents again loss from liability imposed by law or damage to any property, caused directly or indirectly by the performance or execution- of this contract or any subcontract thereunder. THE POLICY OR POLICIES, OR RIDER ATTACHED TILE-RETO, SHALL MAIM THE RIVERVIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AS A NAHED INSURED.AND PROVIDE FOR AT LEAST A TEN (10) DAY'S-WRITTEN NOTICE- OF POLICY LAPSE OR CANCELLATION TO THE DISTRICT. Said public liability and property damage insurance shall be maintained by the contractor in full force and effect during the entire period of per- formance under this contract in the amounts of not less than the following: (1) Limit of liability for injury or accidental death: One person........................................ $500,000 One accident ..................................... $500,000 (2) Limit of liability for property damage: One Accident .......:............................ $500,000 If the contractor fails to maintain such insurance, the Public Agency may terminate this contract and deduct and retain a sufficient amount of money from any sums due the contractor under the contract to cover any damages which the Public Agency may be liable to pay as a result of any uninsured operations by the contractor thereunder. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which the contractor may be held responsible for payment of damages to persons or property resulting from his operations or the operations of any subcontractor under him. c. Contract Bonds. The contractor shall, at the time of signing the contract, furnish two good and sufficient surety bonds of a surety com- pany or companies authorized to do business in the State of California and satisfactory to the Public Agency. A bond in an amount equal to one hundred (100) percent of the total bid for one year's work for the payment of just claims for materials, labor and subcontractors employed by him thereon, and . a bond in an amount equal to one I=undred (100):percent of the full amount of the total bid for one year's work and as surety for the faithful performance of the contract. 2. The contractor shall comply with all local, State, and Federal regula- tions applicable to labor, wage rates, hours of work, apprentices, aliens, subcontractors, and preference for materials. Wages paid shall not be less than the current list of prevailing wages as established by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County for the District. 3. The contractor shall furnish all equipment, material, supplies and labor where ordered, and pay all fees necessary to complete the i.-ork to the satisfaction of the Public Agency. 4- The contractor shall complete all abatement and correction work in the Orders to be issued by the Public Agency. The Orders will consist of parcels identified by County assessor parcel numbers and will include copies of assessor map book pages for location of parcels. The type work to be com- pleted on each parcel will be specified in these Orders. Only those parcels indicated for abatement work in such Orders will be abated under the contract (Agreement) and said parcels shall be abated by the date specified in the Orders for the abatement work on such parcels. 5. The contractor shall return the work order(s) no later Phan onp (1) week after the work completion date specified in the order(s). . -2- 00114 1 , 6. Any other forms or controls that may be required by the Public Agency shall be completed by the contractor. The contractor shall maintain all re- cords and reports-pertaining to any work under the contract and have them avail- able for inspection by the Public Agency. 7. -The Public Agency must approve the corrective (abatement)_work before payment may be made to the contractor. The work shall be performed under the general supervision of the Fire Chief, or his authorized representative, who shall have the authority to approve or reject any portion of the work, or to order the suspension of the work for cause. 8. Method of Measurements for payment. a. Units expressed in acres. (1) Large Areas Q5 acre or more). The eradication of vegetation from large areas of 3_ acre or more shall be paid for at the unit price bid per acre set forth by the successful bidder in his bid. Quantities shall be measured ; to the nearest 1/10th of an acre. Examples Lot-.area = 1.5 acres. Payment = 1.5 x unit price per application/ or discing. b. Units expressed in square feet. (1) Individual-'Lots or Parcels (Less than 31 acre each). The eradication of vegetation from lots or parcels of less than 'h acre each shall be paid for at the unit price bid per 1,000 square foot unit set forth by the successful bidder in his bid. Single units less than 1,000 square feet shall be considered one (1) unit. Areas larger than one (1) unit shall be measured to the nearest one-half (1) unit. For example: 1 to 1,000 square feet. Payment = 1 x unit price per application 1,001 to 1,500 square•feet. Payment - 1.5 x unit price per application 1,501 to 2,000 square feet. Payment = 2 )i unit price per application and continuing by ''f units to a maximum of 22 units. 9. Payment for completed work will be made twice monthly on the 10th and 25th and then only for completed work lists received by the Public Agency ten (10) business days prior to these dates. 10. 10% of the payment due for completed work will be withheld until thirty- five (35) days after the completion of all regularly assigned work, expiration of the period for filing of liens of October 31st, annually, whichever is later. The Public Agency will file a Notice of Completion upon acceptance of the completed work at the end of each year for that year's work. 11. The contractor shall not correct or abate parcels where Orders have been issued, when the following conditions are found to be present. a. Any property that shows signs of started or attempted correction and abatement. b. Growing crop land. C. If permission to enter upon any premises is denied, or the work- men are ordered off the property, all workmen and equipment are to be removed and the Public 'Agency notified. 12. Orders will be furnished and only that work indicated for correction and work in such Orders will be compensated-under the contract. 00115 t 13. Where the contractor is unable to complete the work as ordered, he shall inform the Public.Agency within h8 hours stating why such work was not or cannot be completed as ordered. 14. The Public Agency reserves the right at any time during the period set for performance of the work to.- a. o:a. Specify a particular method of correction and work for any_given property. b. Add to the amount of work to be completed., C. Remove certain work from the list (orders). d. Schedule certain work as to date correction and work is to be carried out. 15. The contractor will be compensated for that work completed-at the rate specified for that type of work supplied on the bid proposal. The number of parcels specified is estimated as a basis for bid purposes only and the contractor shall, accept payment at the various unit prices for only that work supplied and actually completed with no additional allowances'to be rade. 16. With respect to all,types of work to be done on an hourly basis, the Public Agency nay specify the maximum amount of time which will be chargeable and allowed for payment by the Public Agency for work performed on any particular parcel of property. If the contractor disputes the raximum amount of time Vaich the Public Agency will allow for-correction of a fire hazard, he shall submit the ratter to the Fire Chief for determination in writing, setting. forth the specific facts, reasons for circumstances justifying the granting of additional time to hire for the particular work. The Fare Chief Is determination . shall be final and conclusive respecting the dispute and the amount of compen- sation due the contractor 17. Adequate office co,--nunications shall be maintained by the contractor and the contractor must be available for contact by the Public Agency during the normal working day (8am to .pm). 18. Tach tractor, dozer, rotovator or other mechanized abatement equipment used in crop land, range land, watershed or other open land shall have an approved snare arrestor affixed to the exhaust system, in accordance with Section 13005 California Health and Safety Code. 19. The Public Agency ray azesd the contract to add additional areas and properties for abatement and the contractor has thirty (30) days after notifi- cation in which to accept the amended documents. If said acceptance is not verified within such period, the contract is therewith terminated and no further work or compensation therefore, shall be due or allowed under the contract. 20. The Fire Chief, as Adwinistrator of the Public Agency,' shall have fin?3 Bete-:-;nation as to any conflict, dispute, changes or amendments, and shall be the sole judge conce_ining the intent of the contract document:. 21. In accordance with Section 12 of the abatement contract, the contract- or shall conform to the requirements of Section 1aOO through 11113 of the Govern- ment Code pertaining to subcontractors. SECTION C - CO£'R,£C ION Ah"D ABATE MY SPECIFICATIONS 1. Scope. The conditions to be covered under this contract consist of furnishing alt rateri.als, tools, equipment, transportation, incidentals and labor as specified in the Contractor qualifications, unless otherwise supplied by the Public.Agency involved in the reduction, correction, elimination or re.:noval of weeds, refuse, rz3bish or oth` fire hazard conditions, in accord- ance with County Ordina=e and the California Health and Safety= Code, within the District boundaries of the Public Agency. — 1s 00' 116 w, M_ .a 2. The method of correction and abatement shall be to the specifications and standards of the Public Agency and may consist of one or more of the following: a. Rotovating b. Discing c. Dozing d. Spraying of Herbicides e- Removal of Rubbish f. Hand mowing and Hoeing g. Flail mowing and rotary mowing h. various other methods of correction and abatement as directed in the Orders issued. 3. Type of Work. a. Rotovating - The contractor shall provide a minimum of one (1) unit. Parcels of property within the District, usually small lots, may be ordered abated by a tractor drawn rotary tiller. Such tilling shall destroy and bury the grass and/or week growth existing at the time of abatement. b. Discing - The contractor shall provide a minimum of two (2) wheel tractors and two (2) track layer type tractors and discs. The contractor shall disc the areas designated by the Public Agency. Discing equipment shall be set at an angle sufficient to cut the growth loose from its existing position on the first discing. Discing equip- ment shall be set at a sufficient angle on the second discing so that when drawn at the proper speed it will turn the weeds over and cover them with soil- c. Time schedule for Discing- Each area may receive two (2) complete discings, once in May and once in June, or as directed by the Public Agency. d. Dozing - The contractor shall provide a minimun of one (1) dozer. May be used on any parcels throughout the District to level mounds of dirt prior to discing or rotovating, or to clear large areas of debris. e. Chemical Spray - The eradication of vegetation shall be accomplished by the application of chemical spray as hereinafter specified. Note: in instances where chemical abatement is not deemed to be satisfactory the contractor will be required to clean the properties by other methods to be approved in advance by the Public Agency. Such other methods may include discing and/or mowing and/or the application of a contact spray to kill any remaining vegetation. (1) Chemical Spray Applications. The contractor shall apply the chemicals from an agitator tank using spray nozzles and pressure necessary for proper application. A minimum of four (4) units shall be provided. (a) The areas to be sprayed shall be those designated by the Public Agency. (b) The areas to be sprayed shall receive a minimum of two applications together with such additional follow-up sprayings as may be necessary to accomplish the eradication of vegetation to the satisfaction of the Public Agency. Compensation will be made for first two applications only. The time schedule for such sprayings shall be as designated in paragraph (3) following. (c) Sufficient and satisfactory shield shall be used when necessary to prevent the spray from contacting trees, shrubs, vines, flowers or other similar plant life adjacent to the work, but which is not to be eradicated- (2) Time Schedule for Chemical Spraying_ The initial application of chemical spray shall take place after Novatsber 1, 1976- The time for apply- ing the subsequent applications shall be left to the judgnent of the Agency, who shall give at least the (10) days notice to the contractor of the dates for the second application and the date by which any necessary subsequent application must be made. f. Removal of Rubbish - Upon Orders issued, accumulations of rubbish and debris shall:be removed Lo facilitate normal abatement by discing or roto- vating. Also excessive accumulations of rubbish and debris may be ordered removed when such accumulation has been determined to be a fire hazard. The minimum crew for the removal of rubbish shall consist of two men and one ten (10) yard dump truck. Comaensation will be made for on-sight work only (not for travel and dump time or du_^w charges). 00117 g. Hand mowing and Hoeing - Resxdential improved lots, those parcels t specified and areas inaccessible to motorized equipment and too late. to spray, t may be abated by hand operated rotary mower or by hoeing_ Such cut grass and/or weeds shall be removed from the abated parcel and be properly disposed of. The minimum crew for this type of abatement shall consist of two men and the necessary power or hand equipment or tools. h. Water Truck - To be utilized for dust control during-rubbish removal, rotovating, or discing operations. Minimum of one (1) water truck to be provided. i. Loader, Scraper, Wheel or Tractor Type-- Equipped with minimum'3/4 yard bucket. To be utilized for rubbish removal and scraping of vegetation from cracked pavement, etc. Minimum of one (1) loader to be provided. s : J. Rubber Wheel Tractor Powered Rotary and Flail Mowing - To be utilized in areas where mowing by motorized equipment is possible. Minimum of one (1) of each 48" mower to be provided. k. Various other Methods - As assigned by the Public Agency in order to secure compliance with District Ordinances. t 4. The contractor shall perform the type of work for a particular property as directed ty the Public Agency. . 5. Compensation for Work=C6mpleted a. The contractor shall be paid at the unit price per application, or per discing, or portion thereof, as indicated on the bid proposal for the type of work completed for the term of the contract and may be compensated for other assigned work as may be agreed upon by the Public Agency. b. In any case, the work must be completed to the satisfaction of the Public Agency and in accordance with these specifications and other contract documents before any compensation can be paid. -6- 00118 Ll ;Off , - - t - RECEIVED SEP 7, 1976 (19761.977 Abatement) I P cs!al - - Cteax 80AW of sup=aviso.q; �ohRAC ACo. P R O P 0 S AL_ For the perfor=ance_of fire-hazard correction and , abatement work in the Riverview Fire Protection District. Hame of Bidder: _ . Business Address: - Place of Residence: _ The undersigned hereby offers to furnish all egailomentf -materials and labor where ordered, and to do the work necessary to complete the project as described in the Notice to Contractors in accordance with the Contract and Specifications relating thereto which are on file at the District office of the Public Agency at the unit-prices set forth on page 2 of this proposal at a total bid amount of Total amount of composite bid from page Dollars The work -.-M be done pursuant to the attached . 'Specifications' and the 'Orders' as issued by the Public Agency as to the specific properties to be abated. The 'Contractor's Qualifications' will be confirmed, analy-ed and evaluated by the Public Agency after the public opening of the bids by the Contra Costa County Board of Supern'isors, prior to the award of the contract by the Board • to the lowest responsible bidder.. And, further, the undersigned agrees to enter into a contract with the Public Agency- to do the work as provided above if awarded the contract and to furnish the prescribed bonds and insurance. Contractor (General) Authorized Signature Si.anature to be notarized Date: 2iOT VALID TWESS RETUPIM 14IV CO2i?LtiED PAGES 2, 3, , 5 and 6 Page l or 6 pages. 00119 Microfilmed with board order s 1876-1A77 Abatmont Proposal TYPE OF WORK ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL (To b, done twice per year per parcel) -QUANTITY PER PER YEAR In accordance with Abatement-Specs. UNITS 1. Chemical spraying of lots or , parcels less than �3 acre 4,020 1,000 sq.ft. 2. Che-ndcal spraying of large areas 12 acre and larger 245 Acre r TYPE OF WORK ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL �j QUANTITY PER PER YEAR DISCING In accordance with Abatement Spec. Units 1. First discing of lots or parcels ` less than acre 165 1,000 sq.ft. 2. Each additional discing of lots or parcels less than 12 acre 165 1,000 sq-ft. t 1 3. First discing of parcels 32 acre - and larger 350 Acre i 4. Each additional discing of parcels acre and larger 350 Acre TYPE OF WORK F-STIJ61ATED UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL QUANTITY PER PER YEAR In accordance with abatement specs_ ROTOVATING Units 1. First rotovating of lots or parcels less than 12 acre 90 1,000 sq.ft. 2. Each additional rotovating of lots or parcels less than � acre 90 1,000 sq-ft. 3- First rotovating of parcels 1 acre and larger 5 Acre d. Each additional rotovating of parcels acre and larger 5 Acre 00120 TYPE OF WORK ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE. TOTAIC QUANTITY PER PER YEAR Done in accordance with weed abatement MOWING standards.' Units Rubber wheel tractor with minimum of D 48" mower and operator. l. Flail mowing. 45 1,000 sq.ft. Rubber wheel tractor with minimum of 48" mower and operator. 2. Rotary mowing_ 20 1,000 sq.ft. TYPE OF WORK ESTIMATED UNIT UNIT PRICE. QUANTITY PER HOUR. in accordance with abatement specs. Units Rubbish removal E (minimuri 2 men, one ten yard dump t-rucki 55 Flours Hand mowing and hoeing. F (minimum two men, hand or power equip.) 40 Hours Loader/Scraper, wheel or track type and G operator 15 Flours (minimum 3/4 yard bucket) H Angle dozer and operator 8 Hours TOTAL COMPOSITE BID $ The Contract will be awarded on the basis of the lowest comoosite-bid and proven ability, dependability, and responsibility, regardless of the individual unit prices listed for applications or discing. COMPENSATION SHALL BE MADE FOR TIM TYPE OF WORK COMPLETED AT THE UNIT PRICE LISTED PER APPLICATIONS OR DISCING. NOT VALID UNTWSS RETURNED WITH COMPLETED PAGES 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 00121 G COYIRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS Experience A. years in professional abatement business." B. Abat"ent contracts successfully completed: YEAR . AGENCY OR FIRM ADDRESS • 1. 2. ' 3. Previous Bonding Companies: f_j Labor and Materials /--7 Performance ' AGENT ADDRESS BONDING COMPANY �E- B. C. : D. =} Equipsent, Contractor owaed: i A. 2m. TYPE MAY BE INSPECTED AT (Location) � • 1. Tractor(s) with Rotovator(a) 2. Tractor(s) with Disc(s) 3. Dozer(s) ' 4. Spray Equipment 5. Equip. Transport Vehicle(s) 6. Hand Rotary Mowers 7. Rubbish Eaul Truck(s) 8. Misc. Equip--ent B. List ntmber of e=ployaes: FULL TL4E PART TIS 1. Field Eaployces 2. Office Staff C. Is all listed cqui =-tnt operationa12 /'7 Yea /7 No (If no, explain) i NOT VAT—ID [ThZrSS RETURIM WITH CO'—DLEM PAGES 1, 2, 4, S and 5 Page 3 of 6 Pagan 00122 ---. ................•.,.,mow.. 1 D. Is all listed equipment owned free and clear? yea jLj2+o (If no, list*equipment being purchased and/or leased) FOUIF. LMER/LESSOR LENDER/LESSOR ADDRESS ' . 2. 3. (Use back of page if necessary) Are all equipment contracts or lease payments current? i L�Yes No (If no, esplaia) f E.- Are there payments due for mechanical-repairs and/or-equipment parts on any of the listed equipment? . • I /__ Yes jC7, No (If yes, list below) EQUIP. MT. DUE MAIR FISH b ADDRESS 1. 2. 1 I' 3. (Use bac.of page if necessary) Are all payments current? L� Yes /_7 No (If no. explain.) Sub-contractors A. List perc—tage of each typa of abate=ent work to be complated by sub-contrator(s)s 1. Rotovating 2. Discing i 3. Dozing f . k. Eerbicide Spray 5. Rubbish Re=aval 6. Bs^-3 lioaring b Boeing B. Ara all s%3-contra=tors listed on. page 6 under contract? ye3 %/ No In the contract binding om the sub-contractor to —ara his comet=,-at for the tern of the abate=...-at contract? FT Yes L7 No (If no, explain) ' �I,ID- 3'so6 h` R.�il'ii �TJ L7I'8 � p�+ S of 6 pa�12J i V. Busies-ss Office: - A. Location: - Address: City.' Zip: WORK }LOURS AFFEB wOkx HouRS Telephoas: mr V.kLiD umns RETuRNm i7ZIE cme mm PAGES 2, 2, 3, 4 and 6 Page 5 of 6 Pages 00124 rx fr, SBCONMCTOR$ Pf►' ftT 1t €I��aAh 2X3T VALID �`- .SS RETIMV =TH C,�ED Page 5 of 6 Pages -r"' 4 and b PAGES 1 2 3 - _ OU124 5 SUBCONTRACTORS FOR FIRE HAZARD AB.1MENr WORK With respect to and incident to the above entitXed work or improvement, the Contractor states the following is the name and the address of the place _ 3 of business of each subcontractor who will Rerform work or labor or reader " service to the Contractor in or about the construction.of the above indicated cork or improvement in an amount in excess of one-half -(1/2) of onepew cent (IX) of the Contractor's total bid; and he further heroin sets forth that type of abaterent equipment which each subcontractor will provide: IZ : YRS. OF AB-ATMMiT EXPERIENCE: ADDRESS: PHONE: _ 11UMBER. 6 TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: • r' EQUIP. LOCATION: NUMBER OF EITLOY"r ES:- _ FULL TIHL: -: PART TITS: IS THIS SUBCONTRACTOR UNDER CONTRACT: No f NAHE: YRS. OF ABATaMn MERIENCE: t ADDRESS: PHONE: i r NiJ:iSEB A TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: EQUIP. LOCATION: _ NUNBER OF EMPLOYEES: FULL TDO: PART TIRE: IS THIS SUBCO:TRACTOB UNDER CONTRADICT: / / Yea LJ No (� 2`AME: YRS. OF ABATE%= EXPERIENCE:' r ADDRESS: PHONE: IM-1118.R S TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: EQUIP. LOCATION: IiUMER OF EeLOYEES: FULL TIRE: PART TIME: IS THIS SUBCONTRACTOR UNDER CONTRACT: _ Yes J No :r • r I< YRS. OF ABATME T EXPERIEIr'CE: ADDRESS: PHONE: NUMBS S TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: i EQUIP. LOCATION: NUHBER OF MiPLOYEES: FULL TIK-P: PART TM: i IS THIS SUBCONTRACTOR UNDER CWSTRACT: / / Yes %/ No NAHE: YRS. OF ABATMENT EXPERIENCE: ADDRESS: PHONE: I:LDMM S TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: � EQUIP. LOC.4TI0t1: '. NUMBER OF M'!PLOYEES: FULL TIME: PART ME: � IS THIS SUBCONMACT03 UNDER CONTRACT: 1 7 Yes 1-7110 I Nd*�: YRS. OF AIMMENT ESPERZENCE: ! ADDRESS: PHONE: r I.-UHBER. b Tr?Z EQUIP. AVAILABLE: r L•'QUIt LOCATION: Nu..-MER OF L-2LOYEES: FULL TIME: PART TIHE: IS THIS SU=,N---.:ACTOR UNDER Co"MI&CT: /_/ Yam L/ No YRS. OF AHAT"'= EXPER ENCS: ADD3ESS: PHONE: NMOEM S TYPE EQUIP. AVAILABLE: EQUIP. LOCATION: 't 2.:, om OF n-MIOYEES: FULL TIME: PA+Y 'Tu-= I IS THIS SUBCOtiiRACTU3 MMER COY MCI`.: Yea L/ No NOT VALID URLP.BS RMIURNED WITH COMPLrTED PAGES 1, 2, 3. 4, and S Page 6 of 6 Pages 00125 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Travel Authorization IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Jack H. Shaffer, Supervising Auditor-Appraiser and Kenneth D. Chrisman and James D. Peterson, Senior Auditor-Appraisers, Office of the County Assessor, are AUTHORIZED to travel to New York and vi- cinity during the period October 3, 1976 through October '22, 1976 for the purpose of conducting audits. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 197x. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Assessor affixed thislth day of Senterber . 19 7r Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON. Clerk BDeputy Clerk 00126 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 1576 In the Matter of Travel Authorization IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Robert W. Giese, Acting Director of Building Inspection is AUTHORIZED to attend 54th Annual Business [fleeting of the International Conference of Building Officials in Des Moines, Iowa during the period of October 10, 1976 through October 16, 1976 at County expense. Passed by the Board on Senter*ber 7, 1974. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Building Inspection Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervisors cc: County Administrator offiixed this 7'-11 day of'�enter^ner 19'� Auditor — �- J. R. OLSSON, Clark Sy � Deputy Clerk 00127 E In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Suit to Recover Costs Due Contra Costa County IT IS BY TFE BOAT! ORDE;.FD that legal action be initiated in the Small Clairs Court by the Auditar-Controller's Office against the following person to recover the cost owed Contra Costa County: Verle Hall Public VTorks 9362.57 PASSED AND ADOPTED on !:enta-,l,er 7, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orivinating Dent: Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisor affixed this 7th day of Sent, -hPr 19 7r J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ..�j� Deputy Clerk H 2s 1217: - 15461 00128 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California e Sentember "l ' 1976 f In the Matter of Authorizing Placement for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court Number 45506) in Lincoln Child Center, Oakland, California, at a rate of $1590 per month, effective Sentersber R, 1079. PASSED BY THE BOARD on Septer^ber 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori g: Director, HP.A Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Social Service, Supervisors I.I. Hallgren County Administrator affixed this 7th day of ^ente-her 19 76 County Auditor-Controller �� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. Deputy Clerk JB 00129 x In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 7F, In the Matter of Authorizing Placement for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court dumber 27912) in the Work Training Program, Inc., Santa Barbara, California, at a rate of $812 per month, effective September R, 1017t. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Ori g: Director, NRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Social Service, Supervisors tl. Hallgren affixed this 7th day of Sentemhe 19 7 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By— �e� Deputy Clerk JB '•4a_�Crai 00130 t f\ t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . 19 76 In the Matter of Memorandum Transmitting Commments on Recommendations of the 1975- 1976 Grand Jury The County Administrator having submitted a memorandum dated September 7, 1976 transmitting comments on the recommendations of the 1975-1976 Grand Jury; and The County Administrator having recommended that the Board take said comments under review for one week (September 14, 1976) for consideration as those of the Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid memorandum is ACKNO11LEDGED and the recommendation contained therein APPROVED. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: District Attorney Supervisors Treasurer-Tax Collector Assessor affixed this 7th day of September 1976 Clerk-Recorder Sheriff-Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Human Resources Director J Planning Director By �J�O/i_i �,cy�r1 , Deputy Clerk Veterans Service Officer Far,:/Crair;1f'" Probation Officer Public tdorks Director Agricultural Commissioner Public Defender H _i;Co�tf Counsel 7 F.-,._ .-.•+t l .. 001.3 . I County Administrator Contra Board of Supervisors Jamas P.Kenny Cosia 1st DisM County Administration Building Alfred tit.Dias Martinez.California 94553 County 2nd District (315)372.4080 Jamds E.Moriarty 3rd District Arthur G.Will Marren N.Boggess County Administrator 4th District Edmund A.Linscheid 5th District .,4F . t To: Board of Supervisors Date: September 7, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, Subject: Comments on the Report of County Administrator the 1975-1976 Grand Jury Under Penal Code Section 933, your Board is required to comment on the findings and recommendations of the Grand Jury that pertain to County government matters under your control within sixty days after the Grand Jury submits its final report. To assist you, my office has carefully reviewed the 1975-1976 Grand Jury report taking into account the comments of County department heads, and has compiled a suggested response. It is recommended that these comments be taken under review during the ensuing week and that they be accepted (modified as deemed desirable) as those of your Board at your September 14, 1976 meeting. Several of the elective County officers filed their comments with me, as did other County department heads, at my request. The responses of the elective officers, other than that of the Sheriff- Coroner which was acknowledged by your Board on August 24, 1976, are transmitted herewith for your information and in accordance with Penal Code Section 933. C_-AH:lk Attachments cc: Presiding Judge of the R E C E I�T E D 1975-1976 Grand Jury County Clerk-Recorder SEP ? 1976 J. P_ O:5',CN QF?i{ BOA2a O-- J?:KVt:DxS -Q. Microfilmed with board ordK 00112 1975-76 GRAND JURY RECOL LNIENDATIONS AND COLIAIENTS 1. The 1976-77 Grand Jury thoroughly review the Ernst & Ernst Special Report of May 5, 1976 on the Contra Costa County Hospital. 2. Concern itself with` the particular areas of third-party reimbursements and cost containment. 3. Insist that the recommendations of Ernst & Ernst be utilized to the fullest extent possible in order to maximize dollar revenues and returns and minimize costs to the County. 4. Continue this Jury's efforts to an effective conclusion and thereby correct the many inefficiencies and inadequacies in the operation and administration of the County Hospital. 5. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator must share responsibility for the costly inefficiencies and inadequacies in the operation and administration of the County Hospital. 6. That the duties of Dr. Degnan be restricted to those of Medical Director only. The Medical Director shall be accountable to the Hospital Administrator_ 7. The administrative, financial, accounting and operational duties should be assigned to a person who has the following qualifications: a. A masters degree in hospital adminis- tration including finance and accounting. b. Have at least five years' successful experience in a comparable hospital (as defined by Hospital Administrative Services) . COe1MENT: The following covers recommendations Numbers 1 through 7 of the 1975-1976 Grand Jury Report: A thorough review is being made of the Ernst & Ernst Special Report which covered the two broad areas of third-party reimbursement and cost of general operations of the Medical Services Department. The County Administrator, County Auditor-Controller, Human Resources Agency Director and IMedical Services Director are reviewing the Ernst & Ernst report very carefully and are preparing answers to the questions raised. O0133 2. A thorough review of the third-party reimbursement matter is in order, and the various county departments are working with the State and the fiscal intermediary to determine better method, of rc,r-ntj„-i n„ rniint-v -n-t Thi- i- -n • f.. 1- -L v i.c.—..) . COeIMENT: The following covers recommendations Numbers 1 through 7 of the 1975-1976 Grand Jury Report: A thorough review is being made of the Ernst & Ernst Special Report which covered the two broad areas of third-party reimbursement and cost of general operations of the Medical Services Department. The County Administrator, County Auditor-Controller, Human Resources Agency Director and Medical Services Director are reviewing the Ernst & Ernst report very carefully and are preparing answers to the questions raised. 00133 2. A thorough review of the third-party reimbursement matter is in order, and the various county departments are working _ with the State and the fiscal intermediary to determine better methods of recapturing county costs. This is an extremely difficult area and one in which the County has far from full control. Reports on this matter will be forthcoming through- out the year. With respect to the cost of operation of the cost containment area, an item by item analysis is being made of the data contained in the Ernst & Ernst report; and conclusions will be filed with the 1976-77 Grand Jury during the course of the year. Several deficiencies have been identified in the consultant's analysis to date, and these will be commented upon in the reports. This report coincides with a reorganization of the adminis- trative structure of the Medical Services Department and is timely for purposes of the Grand Jury's review. The consultant's recommendation for the establishment of a Medical Services Department as an enterprise operation, including designation as a community hospital, is a major policy decision and requires a great deal more analysis in depth than is provided in the report by Ernst & Ernst. It is hoped that the Grand Jury will assist the Board of Supervisors in review of these questions during this year and that conclusions will be arrived at only after thorough and systematic study. 8. That the municipal bonds be retained in the portfolio until such time as a higher dollar return can be obtained from obligations of similar maturity. CO,-ZIENT: Concur; an inordinate capital loss would result from sale under current market conditions. 9. County financial records should be closed within 90 days and no later than 120 days after the ending of the fiscal year (June 30th) . COMMENT: County Auditor-Controller anticipates closing the financial records for the 1975-76 fiscal year on October 8, 1976, a period of 100 days from the close of the fiscal year; this approximates the 90-day goal cited and is well within the 120-day maximum limit specified. 00134 3. 10. Heads of departments should continuously scrutinize the use of cars by employees so as to minimize automotive costs to the County. C0:•MENT: Concur; the Office of County Administrator, in conjunction with the Public Works Department, monitors car assignments and car use and also investigates complaints of misuse. 11. Continual studies should be made expediting the use of vacant space in county-owned and leased buildings. Best use of space now available should be made before additional outside leasing or purchasing. COMMENT: Concur; unforeseen delays do, however, occur in relocation of departments into vacated or rental space. 12. All internal audits should be replied to and followed for compliance. The staff of internal audit should be increased so that auditors can review each department each year. COMMENT: Concur with first recommendation. Addition of internal auditors has been withheld to preclude increasing property tax requirement. 13. Increase and partition off area in Building Inspection Depart- ment for issuing of building permits so persons can have some privacy when explaining their problem. COLNMENT: Partitioning proposal will be examined by county staff. Establishment of a Central Permits Bureau, which would resolve the problem on a more comprehensive basis, is also under review. 14. Fill the position of County Building Inspector in accordance with Civil Service regulations. COMMENT: The Board of Supervisors has approved refilling of the Building Inspector position, and a Civil Service examination is in process. 15. That plea bargaining be limited to first time offenders. 16. That the practice of involving juveniles in plea bargaining be discontinued. 17. That sentence bargaining be eliminated. 18. That the District Attorney maintain meaningful and comprehensive statistics on all cases involving plea and sentence bargaining. 00135) 4. COm-LENT: The following covers recoT-nendations Numbers 15 through 18 of the 1975-76 Grand Jury Report: See the District Attorney's memorandum of August 19, 1976. 19. That the Sheriff and Auditor devise a better system for handling the prisoners` trust fund and the cash bail bonds. COWIENT: County Auditor-Controller advises -that a Systems Accountant will be assigned to review this matter during the current fiscal year. 20. That the Sheriff budget funds to hire clerical personnel to handle these funds rather than use the higher-salaried deputies who are hired to protect the public. COIVIENT: Sheriff concurs in desirability of proposal, but feels additional clerical staff is required for implementation of the proposal. 21. That it be made mandatory, any monies due a prisoner be returned at time of release from custody. CO',TNIENT: County Auditor-Controller advises that this has always been policy, and Sheriff advises that there is no significant problem at this time in lack of adherence. 22. That continued effort be made to improve security and surveillance at the branch jail. COLNLNIENT: Sheriff advises that the situation in the branch jail been somewhat improved by building modifications and allocation of additional staff, but that this facility was not designed for its present use and will never be a satis- factory solution to overcrowding of the main jail in Martinez. 23. That medically trained staff be assigned to this facility on a daily or part-time basis. COWMENT: Sheriff advises that under present practice sick cal!ll is held by county doctors three times per week and that a Licensed Vocational Nurse from the main jail also visits the facility as time permits; supplementation of this service by assignment of additional personnel from County Hospital would be desirable but cost considerations are the practical limitation. 00136 5. 24. That a full-time general purposes maintenance man from the Public Works Department be assigned full time to the Clayton Valley Facility. COMMENT: Objective is desirable, but staffing and cost considerations have precluded implementation. 25. That the County discontinue the practice of selling firearms. That all firearms, except those retained for official use, be destroyed. COMMENT: Sheriff advises that rifles and shotguns will be destroyed unless the value is sufficient to warrant special auction to licensed firearms dealers; handguns are destroyed. 26. That the Sheriff budget the funds for the purchase of wood gun racks or paper scabbards to store rifles and shotguns. The gun racks could be constructed by the Rehabilitation Center inmates at little cost to the County. The scabbards can be purchased on the open market at nominal cost. COMMENT: Sheriff advises that a vendor of suitable paper scabbards has been located and an order placed, and that efforts are being made to obtain improved evidence storage space. 27. That the County Clerk establish a position of Exhibit Custodian from existing staff, and that this position be solely responsible for the custody and control of all property entered as exhibits in Superior Court. COMMENT: - County Clerk-Recorder advises that he is arranging to move keys for court exhibit room to the custody of the Supervising Court Clerk, but that an additional employee is required to implement this proposal as a main duty. 28. That the Board of Supervisors, Probation Department and all other county bodies involved petition the State to change the time given for the probation investigation from 21 days to 30 days. COMMENT: Proposal involves legislation of statewide significance; discussion of the proposal with county legis- lators is suggested in conjunction with compilation of the county legislative program for the 1977 calendar year. 29. That the courts inform the Probation Adult Division about individuals convicted no later than the day following date of conviction. COI•MENT: Objective desirable, but court personnel do experience practical problems which interefere with conformance. 00137 4 � 6. 30. That a time and motion study be made immediately to justify the time spent by Probation Officers on investigations and supervision. COINMENT: Probation Officer advises that time studies were completed in 1954 and 1959. Such studies do not eliminate subjective judgemental considerations, however, of the number of cases to be assigned per worker. Cost is the practical limitation on additional personnel. 31. That the Board of Supervisors take a critical look at any proposed increase in juvenile staffing for fiscal year 1977. COI-HENT: Recommendation implemented; no increase in juvenile Staffing was authorized for the 1976-77 fiscal year. 32. That the County take the necessary steps to implement the legislation (AB 3121) when it becomes law. CO,%LIENT: AB 3121 was very substantially amended during the last few days of the legislative session. If signed by the Governor, implementation will need to be weighed taking amendments into account. 33. Immediately compile, adopt and publish a complete new manual of procedures related to the incurring and reimbursement of all actual and necessary BARTD business related expenses, in keeping with the standards and proprieties of a highly visible public agency. 34. Adopt a separate budget for the Board of Directors in the form of specific line items (salaries, conferences, etc.) . 35. Establish accounting procedures which segregate all Board expenses under one account number. 36. Require approval, or reapproval, of each out of District trip of more than 100 miles one creek prior to trip by a majority of the Board and recorded in minutes. 37. Hotel and transportation of Board to be arranged for by appropriate BARTD department, and paid directly by BARTD vouchers. 38. No personal home telephone expense to be reimbursed (answering services, etc.) . 39. Provide each Board member with a telephone credit card all charges against which clearly indicate originating Board member, number called and duration of call. Each Board member required to identify and justify all calls as requested. 00138 7. 40- No secretarial, administrative or other services by non-BARTD Personnel to be reimbursed unless reason for and cost of be authorized by a majority of the Board prior to such use and recorded in the minutes. of than 100 miles PL-Lu" of,thee Board and recordedein�minutes. L� , artment, and paid directly by BARTD 37, Hotel and transportation of Board to be arranged for y appropriate BARTD dep vouchers. personal home telephone expense to be reimbursed (answering38. No P etc.) . services, 39. Provide each against which clearlymember hindicatehoriginane tingit cBoardll charges agar member, number called and duant member required to identify i1jcall-n Of ard ustifyall calls as requested. 00138 7. 40. No secretarial, administrative or other services by non-BARTD personnel to be reimbursed unless reason for and cost of be authorized by a majority of the Board prior to such use and recorded in the minutes. 41. A copy of all Board members' correspondence, or other written materials, relating directly or indirectly to BARTD business must be furnished for the appropriate BARTD official files immediately. 42. Expense for "in district" transportation to and from BARTD related meetings not to exceed basic personal car mileage allowance. 43. Reasonable lunch expense allowable only when compensable meetings are held both a.m. and p.m. of same day; except under special circumstances which are explained to and approved by a majority of the Board at the next subsequent Board meeting and entered in the minutes. 44. All expense items requiring approval by the Board must be considered individually and Board action recorded in minutes. 45. BARTD to pay for the listing of each individual director's name in the telephone directory under the BARTD headquarters phone number. 46. All BARTD expense report forms bear the "under penalty of perjury" certification. 47. No expense in excess of $25.00 (other than necessary trans- portation) for a single month be reimbursed without proper supporting documents and separate written explanation. 48. Travel outside of the BARTD, the cost of which exceeds $25.00 and which is not approved in the current Board budget, must have prior approval of a majority of the Board of Directors assembled in a recognized public meeting. 49. No advances for Directors travel expense, other than the recognized "per diem" allowance, shall be made. 50. Delete present Section 7-1.1 chapter VII "Interpretations of Director's Rules" as revised November 13, 1975, which reads: "These rules are designed solely to facilitate the handling by the Board of Directors of its own affairs, and the Board of Directors retains the sole right to interpret these rules. No action taken by this Board shall be deemed invalid because of any conflict with these rules, and any action taken by the Board shall be deemed to suspend any rule conflicting with the action taken." 00139 �J 8. CWLMENT: The following covers recommendations Numbers 33 through 50 of the 1975-76 Grand Jury Report: This group of recommendations all pertain to administration of the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District. The San Francisco BARTD is an independent district governed by its own elected Board of Directors and, accordingly, referral of these recommendations to the District is recommended. 51. In the event a vacancy on the Board of Directors occurs for any reason more than 90 days prior to a general election involving the District in which the vacancy occurs, the mayors and supervisors of the County shall meet as a special selection committee and appoint a legally qualified person from the District in which the vacancy exists to serve the remainder of the unexpired term. C0*1ENT: Because Directors of the transit district are now selected by election rather than appointment, a review of the statutes relating to replacement of Directors is desirable. Consideration of this matter in conjunction with compilation of the 1977 county legislative program is recommended. 52. flake it mandatory that the formation of a special district must be done by the vote of the citizens residing in the proposed district. 53. Establish a maximum allowable dollar figure for issuance of bonds for the district. 54. Establish a maximum tax rate for bond service. 55. Provide that the maximum total tax rate and other service charges chargeable by the district each year may not exceed the amount necessary for the servicing of the bond debt as established originally by the voters; except when such excess income is applied immediately to bond retirement, without 2/3 approval of the district voters. 56. Provide that the total income derived from the application of the "maintenance and operation" tax and all other charges may not exceed the previous year's charges by more than the rise in the U. S. Government's cost-of-living index for the previous 12 months plus 3% without approval by a simple majority of the district voters. 57. Establish the independent post of special districts analyst. The duties of this person would be to examine and report and recommend to the Board of Supervisors such things as may 00140 W-4. . 9. be requested in the budget of all districts under the control of the supervisors. This person would secondarily perform such other duties relating to special district operations as directed by the Board of Supervisors from time to time. 58. Any district presently dormant or non-operative for any reason should be immediately dissolved. CO"• TENT: The following covers recommendations Numbers 52 t -rough 58 of the 1975-76 Grand Jury Report: Philosophically, it is difficult to disagree with the Grand Jury Committee report on special districts as it relates to the number of "special districts," and to citizen confusion as to the complex property tax structure that flows from that number. On the other hand, as to sheer number, it may reflect that each area pays for the many local governmental services that it receives, rather than having the burden fall upon the County or any particular city, or cities, for all to pay. There are some misconceptions in the committee report. The report quotes that "information furnished by the Contra Costa County Taxpayers' Association that special districts and service areas represent the fastest growing tax category in Contra Costa County" is questionably factual. The number of "special districts," as defined by the State Controller, was 118 in 1965 and is 122 at the present time. That net growth of four "special districts" in eleven years is quite modest for a large urban county. The report contends that there are 190 "special and taxing districts" within this County, which is inaccurate; the source of that number is unknown. On Page 3.13 of the report, it states that "the usual organizational structure of a 'special district' is to have a governing body or commission consisting of five or seven members appointed by the (board of) supervisors," and "in the case of special districts the final power and responsi- bility for the operation of each district reposes completely on the Board of Supervisors_ They approve or disapprove all special district budgets" (underlining added) . These state- ments are somewhat misleading. From the view of legal control of district affairs, there are two types of "special districts." There are presently 23 special districts and 49 county service areas governed by the Board of Supervisors. The budgets of these jurisdictions 00141 10. are reviewed and approved by the board. There are presently 50 special districts operating wholly or partially (BARTD, Air Pollution Control, etc.) within this County which are legally and totally autonomous and have their own governing bodies and do not answer to the Board of Supervisors. These latter districts have their budgets "approved" by the board only in the sense that these districts notify the board as to their property tax requirement amounts, and the board cannot modify these amounts requested. The board does the same thing for all cities (15) within the County. The Grand Jury Committee asks several valid questions: (1) Why special district operations take over double the amount in taxes that the cities do, and are nearly three times higher than the County average statewide? and (2) Does Contra Costa County have far too many special districts and service areas in relation to other counties and Contra Costa's real needs or are they just costing too much? As to (1) , the answer is complex; but a large factor is that while most cities traditionally have their own fire depart- ments and sewer systems (both very expensive functions) ; for example, in this County only three of the fifteen cities have their own fire departments, all of the other cities are served by areawide fire districts which encompass them. Only six of the fifteen cities have their own sewer collection and treatment systems, while all others are within sewer districts; and finally, all water is brought.into this County by two big water districts, not by the cities or County. City taxes would be much higher if the cost of these functions were included as it often is elsewhere. As to question (2) , this County is about eighth in population of California's 58 counties and is about seventh in number of special districts. Population is a factor in the number of special districts. There are many other factors. As to districts "costing too much," that is most difficult to answer. Local governments respond to what, assumedly, most people want as to services, and costs result. Finally, the Grand Jury report suggests that a position of "special district and service area analyst" be created to examine the budgets of all districts for which the supervisors have responsibility. The following should be noted: The total 1975-76 property tax levy of $302,573,000 in Contra Costa County was broken down as follows: 00142 ll. Approximate .Agency Percent Amount County 23.2 percent $ 70,000,000 72 "County" Special Districts 5.3 percent 16,000,000 50 "Autonomous" Special Districts 12.0 percent 37,000,000 19 School Districts 51.5 percent 156,000,000 15 Cities 7.9 percent 24,000,000 100.0 percent $303,000,000 Of the $16,000,000 to 72 county special districts, "over $6.7 million went to one large fire protection district which protects a large central county area including six cities. ,, It is questionable if the suggested new position noted above is warranted on a full-time basis. Review of the "county" districts and their performance is constantly ongoing, but could well be intensified. Any such county "district analyst" would have no control authority with respect to autonomous districts_ The Office of County Administrator monitors the number and active or inactive status of county special districts and service areas with the objective of eliminating those that are inactive and no longer required. The Grand Jury Committee assignment was a difficult and complex one which few Grand Juries have attempted. The overall problem is a vexing one of which the Board of Supervisors and the Local Agency Formation Commission are well aware and seeking solutions to. 59. The Director of Mental Health assume responsiblity for establishing and maintaining a community education program, especially in the area surrounding the County Hospital in Martinez. COMMENT: Concur; a suitable education program could help relieve the anxiety of residents in the area surrounding the County Hospital. 60. The Social Service Department develop or expand an attitudinal posture %,hick recognizes the necessity of operating within its budget and fulfill the responsibility to adjust expendi- tures and comitments in order to avoid revenue crisis_ 00143 12. COZIILIENT: Concur; the comment, however, appears directed to the department operating within its Federal allocation rather ' than within its budget. The latter has not been a problem, whereas decreasing Federal allocations have a major impact on departmental operations. 61. The Social Service Department annually establish a definite quantitative goal of reduction of total costs attributable to forms and paperwork. COMMENT: Continuing efforts to reduce and simplify forms and paperwork in the Social Service Department are warranted. 62. The Social Service Department continue to actively promote the standardization of data collection; annually assure the Board of Supervisors that the department has made concrete efforts to advise appropriate State and Federal departments of the high cost of paperwork imposed on the funds available to this County; and hold this effort to be a part of its accountability for effective and efficient operation. COMMENT: Concur. 63. The Board of Supervisors fully support and aid, in any way possible, the Social Service Department's efforts to seek the standardization of data collection. CMIENT: Concur wherever cost effective means are identified. 64. The Board of Supervisors advise Federal and State officials of the advantages of reducing and controlling the proliferation of paperwork. COMIENT: Board of Supervisors could adopt a resolution on this matter; however, improvements are more likely to result through departmental channels. 65. The County, at the earliest opportunity, provide suitable assigned permanent meeting and office space for the use of the Grand Jury. COW-IENT: Assignment of permanent meeting and office space for use of the Grand Jury has been a problem in the past. Assignment of space should be accomplished in the near future, however, with relocation of the Office of County Counsel. 66. Representatives of the current and past Grand Juries be consulted regarding the specifics of space need requirements. COMMENT: Concur; comment directed to 1976-77 Grand Jury. 00144 13. 67. The County Counsel and District Attorney update the written instructions and guidelines for the Grand Jury and assure they are current. COMENT: The Offices of District Attorney and County Counsel continually update the written instructions and guidelines; guidelines for the 1976-77 Grand Jury have been already revised and distributed to Grand Jury members. 68. A suitable certificate of recognition be given to all Grand Jurors each year. COMMENT: The County has a Certificate of Appreciation form which the Superior Court Judge, who impanels the Grand Jury, might properly present to each member on the completion of their term. 69. The District Attorney and/or County Counsel research, seek, or support legislation which will provide that a County Grand Jury's jurisdiction may extend beyond county boundaries to include the entire legal boundaries of multi-county taxing or assessing districts. COMMENT: This matter is presently under review and can be considered in conjunction with compilation of the legislative program for the 1977 calendar year. Preliminary indications are, however, that some constitutional amendments may be required if the criminal jurisdiction of the Grand Jury or District Attorney is to extend to offenses that occur outside the county boundaries. 0045 f in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sentember 7 , 19 7f? In the Matter of Authorizing Placement for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court Number 48523) in Plumfield, Santa Rosa, California, at a rate of $1029 per month, effective September 8, 1976 PASSED BY THE BOARD on Sect e fiber 7, 197(,. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig• Director, HRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc; Social Service, Supervisor M. Hallgren affixed this 7th day of Se:)terb-;:Zg 76 County Administrator s R. ptp�, Clerk County Auditor-Controller ;��'� By Deputy Clerk JB 00146 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 1976 In the Matter of Approval of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with Mbraga, Providing Transit Services to Orinda [fork Order 5299-926 The Board on April 13, 1976 having authorized the Public Works Director to prepare a joint exercise of powers agreement with the Town of MSoraga to provide for bbraga transit service in the Orinda area; and The Town of bbraga being scheduled to execute the joint exercise of powers agreement at its council meeting on September 8, 1976; and The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board approve the agreement and authorize the execution of the agreement by the chairman, contingent upon approval by the Town of bbraga; and Supervisor Moriarty having nominated Mr. James Lubin, 80 Tara Road, Orinda; and Mr. Alfred Pepin, 26 Fern Way, Orinda, as County members of the citizens advisory committee created by the joint exercise of powers agreement; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation of the Public Works Director and the citizens advisory committee appointments, as recommended by Supervisor Moriarty, are approved. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig. Dept: Public Works, Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Transportation Planning Supewlsors cc Town of Mtoraga affixed this 7thday of_ September , 79 76 Supervisor Moriarty — Public Works Director Transportation Plannirq J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By = Deputy Clerk Jean L. Biller H-?-a.i,/:6 ism 00147 JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT PROVIDING MORAGA-ORINDA BUS TRANSIT 1. PARTIES. Effective 1976, the County of Contra Costa, as political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the Town of 14oraga, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Moraga," pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code (Gov. C Sec. 6500 et seq.), mutually agree as follows: 2. PURPOSE. a. The parties to this agreement are public agencies created by the laws of the State of California and are empowered by law to enter into joint exercise of powers agreements for the purposes herein set forth. b. There exists an opportunity to provide bus transit service in County through the extension and enlargement of the floraga transit systems which will provide efficiencies not available to each agency alone. c. Moraga is presently contracted with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District to provide the Moraga Transit System, and that contract allows the expansion of service as herein proposed. d. The Moraga Transit System, and the proposed extension into County, are and will be paid for by federal and state funds available for the purposes intended, and by local funds as required by Metropolitan Transportation Commission (I•ITC) Resolution No. 144, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part hereof. e. County participation is guided by the local transit policy of the Board of Supervisors (Resolution No. 76/319), a copy of which is attached to this Agreement, marked Exhibit "B", and made a part hereof. 3. AREA. The area encompassed by this Agreement shall be the corporate limits of the Town of Moraga and the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County known as Orinda. 4. ACCOUIITABILITY. Each party is strictly accountable for all funds and must report all receipts and disbursements. 5. CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMITTEE. A Citizens' Advisory Committee shall be created to advise the Town Council of Moraga. Members shall be appointed by, and serve an indefinite term at the pleasure of, the governing body of each party to this agreement, as follows: Moraga - Three (3) members County - Two (2) members ftcrofitmed With bcorci crdw 00148 s 5. CITIZENS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE. (con't) The conenittee shall: a) advise the Town Council of Moraga, which will be the final authority, on all matters relating to service; b) meet at least once a month; c) establish rules of order; d) select officers as deemed needed; and e) perform other duties and functions deemed appropriate. The Town Manager of floraga and the Public Works Director of County, or their designees, shall be non-voting ex officio members of the committee. 6. DUTIES OF VORAGA. Moraga, through its Town Council, shall: a) arrange for service, service extensions as herein provided, and changes in service as required from time to time by direct negotiation with its contractor, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, while recognizing that all areas, regardless of juris- diction, are entitled to an equitable distribution of service. b) seek and consider the advice of the Citizens' Advisory Council on all matters relating to the service; c) provide the lead administrative function relating to all phases of system operations, except those functions which are the direct responsibility of the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District as the contractual system operator. d) distribute or credit fare revenues to each party based upon the ratios of revenue-miles of service and the fares in each party or other such formula deemed appropriate by unanimous consent of the Citizens' Advisory Committee; e) fully defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the County, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands, damages, costs, expenses or liability costs arising out of or in connection with any service performed under this Agreement within or outside the corporate limits of Moraga. Moraga further agrees to have County included with Moraga as additional named insured on Alameda- Contra Costa Transit District's excess insurance policies for public liability, property damage, and workers' compensation, as said inclusion is shown in section 6 of the contract between Moraga and Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement. marked Exhibit "C", and made a part hereof. f) Cooperate fully with County in all related matters. 00149 -2- 5. DUTIES OF 1•,aRAGA. (cont'd) g) recognize the interest of the Orinda community in matters relating to service, stops, fares, and other matters occurring outside tka to-an 1 i mi is. 7. DUTIES OF COUNTY. The County, acting through the Board of Supervisors, shall: a) Request, through AC Transit, to the t;etropolitan Transportation Commission (I-ITC), the allocation to M.oraga Transit System of the appropriate share of federal and state funds available for transit operations and capital purchases for service within County. b) budget and pay to Moraga the share of local funds necessary to grovide the service as set forth in the Local Transit Policy Resolution No. 76/319) of the Board of Supervisors of County (Exhibit "B" hereto); said local funds are to be paid periodically, but not less than annually, by County upon billing by iMaraga based on the estimated cost of service to be provided as set forth in Section 5 of Exhibit "C". Adjustment to actual costs shall be made annually within 30 days following the close of the fiscal year. c) provide the lead administrative function relating to establishing a long-term funding commitment as required by Resolution No. 76/319 (Exhibit B); d) cooperate fully with Moraga in all related matters; and e) recognize the contractural arrangement between Moraga and AC Transit District. 8. DISPOSITION OF EQUIPMENT. Moraga and County agree that, in the event this agreement is teriminated, they shall mutually determine upon a fair and equitable basis the disposition of capital equipment, or the proceeds of the sale thereof utilized in the service provided herein, taking into account the interest and authority of the federal government and the financial contribution of the parties to this agreement. 9. SEVERABILITY. Should any part, term or provision of this agreerant be decided by a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or otherwise rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby. 13. AMEND;1E?;TS. This agreement may be amended only by supplemental agreement executeT a parties hereto. 11. TER,-1. This agreement shall be effective as soon as the parties to this agreernnt ave signed. This agreement shall terminate by mutual corsent, or 3 ro nths after one party has given written notice to the other party r-aquesting -3- 00150 ------------------ 11. TERM. (con't) termination, or' two (2) years (730 days) from the date of commencement of transit service in County, whichever occurs first. 9. ,)tVtKAaiU iY. arhould any parL., germ or provision of this agreerent be decided y a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law of the State of California, or othenrise rendered unenforceable or ineffectual, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions snail not be affected thereby. 10. At',ENDMENTS. This agreement may be amended only by supplemental agreement execute 'bythe parties hereto. 11. TEP-M. This agreement shall be effective as soon as the parties to this agreer:Ant have signed. finis agreement shall terminate by mutual consent, or 3 r:onths after one party has given written notice to the other party requesting -3- OU150 11. TERIL (con't) termination, or two (2) years (730 days) from the date of commencement of transit service in County, whichever occurs first. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement. CO 1TRA COSTA COUrl Y TOWN OF 140RAGA 1 BY JEiairnian, P. Kenny / Mayor Board f Supervisors ATTEST: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk ATTEST Toren Clerk By 1. �� 7, �. lr`�• ,deputy APPROVED AS TO FOPJI: APPROVED AS TO FORII: Torn Attorney John B. Clausen, County Couns 1 Deputy -4- 00151 NP- o�s:i- cis ser c'C srtr �azts . a tk ►ue. —Tracsit District. RET30POLITAX TRAASPUTA IOL G07K71LS510x� xx ar,•�,i�, RESOLUT'03x0. 1 ¢ - sf�°+ �s - idirREAS: the auies and Regulations gerLafafag„to the adziaistratioa of-the Transportation Deveiopaent_Act (TDA) az z23 enacted by Chapter 1400 Statutes of 19M(S8 325) and'as rised by_,rhapttr'-1408 Statutes of 1972 (f,9 9S8) and-Chapters?, A� 740 and BIS Statutes of.1973 {58821 5 A33363); provide�thaI j the KeLro luta Traasportatian Caanisston {ATC}r shall frac r"� ad aaalysls nal eralaatioa af.the-total acouz an. C: ated�ta be � available'in the Lnui Tcaaspo ta_tioa Fuad (LTr};of,-the respective,= coaaty aad the relative needs of each cTaicaatfatthe parpases = 'tor whicb,the,fund is intended and ccasisteat with tpe pro a VIS ians of the Act aan"lly appravaslclx,TDAclaSns fowxG1ta e�.ta - codforaaace,with'te Regional Transpor ation Plsa allocatt coatis frau the:LTFs a Afte ainr court ies innth h5an� � •-"�i•�� — ;Freacisco Bay-Area Region and r YHcam Section 99302 of the Public UtiTitiesrCode {P0C}ry i relateCto the-Act States ; Tbc.am{ssica shall ap3rove those ct ies whicrs will not rasult ix.the..caaesiriblt dupl sc_tioa of�Ly blic; ■ traesportAtioa'services*.'and-whica''uill provide for'°a ?:ap coordinated public transportation systes ifi,the u region r a f The Coa:fission say,'on',Its own ati�n arbitratek I= differeaces-{ } between the veriocs.'applicaats 7rf xi (2)'betwesa as applicant"and.a city'orscounty re ; Y' (� yarding 26e costs of the extensloa of services , )c t� t O V� IN!I '7 mt_,`r�iL�' ane WHEREAS. Rule 1651 of.the Secretary of the Business and Tr34sportation Agency, State of Californfz, pertaining to the -- aecinistratioo of the Act, provides that the transportation planning arency.(MTC in this instance) shall allocate TOA conies to a multi-county transit operator only insofar as the operator's TOA claim evidgnces benefit to each of the several counties is the operator's service area comxensurate with the extent of service provided therein, appropriate consideration having been given to administrative, maintenance and other , costs which serve to benefit the transit systea as a whole-, and WrEREAS. by RIC Resolution rio. 67, the Ccmcission adopted a policy to the effect that the Cay Area Rapid Transit District (BAM), as a regional operator, rcu:d Se allocated an "equal aad identical percentage' of TOA monies from the Counties of San Francisco, Alameda and Contra Costa. to cover admiristratian. caintenance, development aid any othar costs, excepting there- from initial construction costs. which serve to benefit the GAUD system as a whole without prejudice to an additional allocation of TOA monies fro= the LTF of the three counties comprising the present BART Oistrict and from the LTF of any other county served by BARTO on the basis of local or regional public trans- portation services provided: and 00153 fi based on,4 Sertcs a {lirr tea. t: weer f rr L Ev t►Se.:t�t lci. ze 'Cywl o.: C» twat i%i • ..La��+ ' n:ts ' �"• vas tied 4t.25 of flee total agates.est gat�d to b tx flabT s for allocation by MTC;in the LTF to .lie Counties of Saa Fraadsco Aidtxeea and Coatra Casa is ffscai year 1973 7t sad "` ; s Y-EzUs. the RTC staff evaluat.oac of TDA',clatas to fiscal year.197243.aad fiscal year 1973 74 disclosed that thereverE k substaattal areas of Coatra Costa County aad to a Tesser ea.eaL � Alaae3a Couaty which econid mot race fva the iaLandeQ Daaefits ate „ RIM tfse Act Sf ell of tbaTDA aonfes tu721 W Lir of CoatranCosta'sa6 Alameda Conatfes verq:all ocafad to P�RTD;aad/or A C`fTraasit& Ofstrtct. bas-Com',public traospartatioagserriceV.provided by .M LDasa-transf C.operators sad L E � ' �* h tHEAEAS, the MTC, in recogaitioa�of�.he need for additioSal N public traaspartatioaaserxfees is areas of ASamedaiaod Coatra d Costa'Couuttas aot served Dy A C Transft [Iistefct. ap,raied tb F Y .: ` reserratioa of ittA oanies to the Lif of Alameda and Coatra los Cooaties in.both fiscal year 1972 73:nQ t9J3'74 to5peavdelae inprcveaeas;ia req,foaaf and`iocaiapobTfe transports foaaery rush YHEREAS 'aa anaooactaeat of a palicy Dyrytbe MCrratatiay m how itAl aoaies army ba+:ltocated to cftfes aad otberlareas %'�3; n r r Alaeda aad Coatra Costa tounties outside ofcA-C_TransI- Dis is sa" ce area for the,`purposeof proxfdigg ar,iaprovie a �M r 9 p blit ;• :: .� r transportation services woald:be 6eaaficiaT to bots tberloca41i yew ' + a ti F14 P11 I � F� r 7a7 is ra T t.;�� • s; £', "ti`x,C4,,V '�' '3kG'rae�A illi+ �i'�j R 'C"' ,'e ,5'-,,f � I. '='- "��Dbie�ire ti 9 sad t�aad. 4 S of Sact ion ii or the Rip*aqd s�acfficaTTy d t, `— '� k pOLTCT S6 Traasit�?rog'raat skalgirt„a,IIgk�prfoty to areas iG the eegiaa xiiere as r.Gsi exfsLsarxktr tbex.erti o' traasitc ssrriceris.�ri-aadaF,* to xezi�sex $- ` iag gelds k $ t ex^'spa, ' ';,•: �i 'nM�B�. _ aoMtkerefore Ot it'r rYa r y as � y t �RESDl7E0 chat ice oetrapotitaa TMraaspo ti*eCo�ai ,s ca = __ riQopts the*ioZioriag policy sadlarr g daGcr asxap o) t xbezo-ad by�the Coaafssfaa a Great.” -A'Allocation tttee s' ,ultbe a4co41fsbceat4W VIN i•�iu respeastbititt�s,'for tb''revi' sa -= tralutioa of ciaios for tke :liccalion,"oGtD..pswaies froa6 = - 'Locatw?Trsasportatioa Fasdrof Alaeeda a iaka,a rasCos WCaaat... effectt,te is tisdi year 1gT475 n P cr i 25Z o' tbt apportiaraeat'-aitkt`caa-Lfes` locat s,* � �rsnspartatiga fartd YiTT LQIIGtaae tb allocated_ 6z –_ Ng ti to BRRTD as a ieyfo attcaast opera:ar"to cove y , sysiea rideaistaia�ain .arere a en :, �;$� F�a�aadlaar otber,�cost eXcep�ing'$Lbe�recca��acon• Qr stractioa cost. rhi�s to beaetf 8J1Ri iyzt r 2 }M additioosT aliacaLfoa of,IO#r p0a�e is BARTt}Gay b s" k; �;4 eec--ended on the basis`-o*I�ocak Qr regfaaal pQbtf' 4 R , transportation serricov provided 271, e r ...:... . ..tSC�.ati- ::a.�.•L: 25.::: :(.7.:.'a.T: 4:•::?�r. i . .'e�•i:�x';� .�' , ' 1�^ F - - you ,be::retora q! :,';tar�a :.c::.{.. : . � ^;;�:�4•z-'!'.. = i� G_ e licca►4G;`' �BR3lD�o :x.;� r •:f t:: fstrie ta,:=pro+SEe [o `or;ta.Ytiyrcreefstfri5:;teede ;end/ _ localpub Iic'.trans port&tfoo serv.cas: - t ;;,bot:rare an:. 5—of-.tba;i cr;ic eae:' pp a ::'afc.ty orothe _ r:.."f w r� - -.,. :. •:.. �:.:"::';=:?: •-::�:"»=��=:,; Y:...d_:�r��,�:'.' area.,outsfde of::A=C�%ragsft:0:3:a:ct.'s:iereicc=:ar"ea'�=referre — _ -��ta.�ia 3�;abore 's4alt;.Ee'recon:ec..e3'zo:�sltocitfoirio feeder.-sad/or,;.lacai= uglir traa3'' p paf a:i:i►se�vfces xhed t sa .-- _ services':are.:susstpn[fa'lty`=Delor;;c�:r Tc:eiKaa¢•frequenc' a� - - "tbase.pro7fdedi byr -C '' 5 .'•'J1t sock-.t ma as toe level an6:rf. pit I•traa�. par tattoo'senrices;'geper Iy aT;:roacti-Yt:ose;'pro4sfded'b' ---LW __ A - =C iraasiE Uts:rirt;:tbc.;"reaaicfa-;n rifogaeaoia,cf: iff S p17+ . ry _ ff- •'-'::��;•:.::.or: other:area,;eutsideat�lC;C4.raasft;.E_is:cict.s..sersire.:---.-----.- : area.;oa. 6W retaoseoded`Cor at.taca:toaJ' ,r - ' • -6..:'Tke'recoc+eaEe6'situcatioa',`o. r:c�tjr.�oerwaiia.'` ap tioasent of. 7rsasporcaticp;9eret:;zent''.c[uanfes; - 4re te_ee6rorua¢ee:`•2'tli�ouSt;5"ra.ore;:;:ri.l'?;Yr`ot..excead= ?= -.�;`� :a):^45 .ci�the�•cosE;:for�'ee�:;.ae flcp-argent x ` C of.:'.the-netcperattag,cciti;:orx:pub fc:trans ' _ ortatfan stew fcisL'= •f i,'ei.4 ia2 costx'oo ro �r - .idea:t fled•-as:cap t telVie,.ro;#eae _ a e- ........... .:...:. ... :me..abcre Reza lutlar.was. :`':" TROpCt:i:Ixai S70R:RT10tt1 _ s.ti red:Aim by'.the-Xetro- "COx7lISSIOS fir;; ani AlCoilvisiloitaa''7raasportatioo:. - -s ;;:. .:: :. O at..a:re utar..:el -=ties of:the C4=issfoa.' - "9;:..'s �: r. <r ia.0aitaa: Callroreit i.j! rt.%-i:.' ;y�� " ;.* _ �r -:Xires'27; 1414. . Jobri':G`i ;:." _ a.. ` 'g 3ecir:t'=::ba 3n`: r ira : . .....:..... ..,...::. r:Z i .• ,. ..::` ?�'�``}. ,jam... _ r - �r ._ -•fir:<'vi. ;w. -r :k'''i";;J'8::� ! y:�.•�•. ;- s;i; - - ^i. �:;i s �;,Z' ..5,.....fir S.�:a^'°..�• ;!'1- s;i..'„f; l iii:•ii!I __ „+!;..et•,�:.;~>'+':f� �f,.T°,,—,.".:x+'^..:,!`.:: :ie.*yr.`,f'�F.fa.;:.,tr",:,, ..;�I,J.a�:t,l; �I. i�l.; ,hl,i; — .'4�; '-ia,.Mt�;:i: ..2'::z`: .'s:•: �i•�}'�::iFI- 1 _ t • _ It:THE SOASD OF SUPEMSOS OP COSTRA COSTA COU2.`S'Y. STATE OF CALIrM%r;,L In the matter of Local Public ) Transit Policy - ) RESOLUTIO.: NO. 76/319 } ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES TitAT:- Because of countywide interest in ir-;,leaenting local transit, together with the deaard for an alternative to the use of the private auteoobile and in keeping with the national interest concerning energy conservation, the following local transit policy is adopted: LOCAL TRT:S1: POLICY I. PV.R-0SE The purpose of this policy is to outline county financial participation in initial icolementation of local transit in the unincorporated area. , It is the-intention of the Board of Supervisors to consider providicg from County sales tax revenues or other revenue sources •• othar than property taxes, funds to o?:size the use of Fa3eral Urban ::ass Transportation agency and Transportation Develor-ment Act ? funds for a limited period of tint to prrsit the operation of a dnc- i onstration transit system to be financed locally on a continuing basis in conjunction with other Federal and State funds- Ii.- CL7:--!ML CO::DITIO::S _ Before the Board of Supervisors considers interim County financing of the local transit system, it must ba determined that a need exists and there mast be a clear expression by the cor::nity that it desires initiating transit service with the understanding that continuation of the local transit service on a long-tern basis is contingent Upon F establishing a source of an-going, adaczate financing, exclusive of 1(( Co-anty funds, by the area of benefit. Long-term financial arrange- nents to be considered shall include establishment of a local public entity with taxing powers authorized by a ballot measure. {' County financial participation shall be limited to a period of two fiscal years. During this period an arrangetent for an assured, on-going source of adequate financing of the system through a public entity eo=prised of the local area Of benefit must be established. If the transit system serves both incorporated and unincorporated i areas. County interim financial participation shall be co==ensurate with the city participation. The County's pro-rata share shall be equivalent to cities' share as measured by such criteria as cost per capita, area served, route miles and headways. ----- county interim funding shall be limited to local matching require- nets necessary to utilize all available Urban "ass Transportation Agency (Chapters III and V) and Transportation Development Act funds, for providinq service at a reasonable service level_ If establishment of a local public entity with taxinq authority is presented to the electorate and rejected, and other Financial arraageaeats cannot be acconOlished, steps will be initiated to terminate further County interim financial assistance- tt 1 i PSOLLTION KO. 76/319 00157 t p� `a xa keeping with the Metropolitan Transportation Cxairzion•s Resional—Transportation Plan, the County will encourage the extension + of existing systeam and the consolidation of local systems, so as to provide maxims efficiency and service. Participation in alternative transportation such as demand responsive service, adbsidixed private carriers, special dcsonstrat3oa projects. and other programs ray be considered if special circu+sstances stow such participation to be desirable. PA:SED and ADOPM by the Board on April 13, 1976. 19.414,Cat Cb to a WL ru a K 0 *-Lae cc—r-+It.a+sn t•.a ea.a Or o:Fl. f ax L%U».n.-z*-M r.nes.--e tr M.taut Ot •1.tA r+a 0".: ":uJ.n ot.?.WY Cwaas H D.a:tl CWY Cia.Y r•"Ant::G APR 13 lgld . a a tsfsotorIO3 co. 76/319 40158 f i ' t . E DF:.rni TO'Zi of A-M ALWI=.-00=1 COSTA T.?:-7.IT BSS:;LIC?FOsi t TIM 0?i,Pi.TI05 OF LOCAL MZ SEWICE. } THIS AGRE'_:EL"r made and entered into on-Jenuavr -, 1976, between the Towa of Y.oraga, a municipal corporation, hereinafter re- ferred to as 'roraga', and Alaneda-Contra Costa Transit District, a body corporate and politic, hereinafter referred to as -AC Transit'; x1 ZS L SS KZ xarREAs, moraga desires to establish local bus service within the boundaries of its town limits ani environs; and WIMRMS, AC Transit is an existing public bus operator in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties; and MLRL'S, it is the intene of Y.oraga and AC Transit to coc ence y local bus service on or about April 5, 1976; and WHEREAS, Y.oraga desires to obtain capital and operating assist- 4 ante from the FeJaral Covernxnt and the 4:etropolitan Transportation Cozai9sion; and WIMRr.%S, it appears to be in the best Interest of Moraga to coa- tract with AC Transit to provide the needed local bus service and to obtain the necessary capital and operating assista.^.;e on behalf of Y.oraga. I:O:t, THEREFOR✓, Y.oraga and AC Transit hereby agree as follows; ` 1. AC Tran.it as operator. AC Transit, nctiag as an independent contractor, shall operate and maintain the local b---z service provided for I in this agreement. 2, oncration F. Faintenancc standards. Ac Transit will operate and maintain the local bus service pursuant to this agreement with the sax maintenance and operating standards, quality of service and equip- i Pent, utilized in its other operations not subject to this agreement. 1, 6XIIA717 /.c 00159 • i 3. yurnishircr of nuscs, C�uipc..ent 4 Facilities. AC Transit will _ supply all the buses, materials, supplies, products, equipment and Other facilities, and provide the necessary manpower. supervision and management s necessary to operate and maintain the local bus service. All equipment S and facilities shall be kept in first-class repair and clean condition by AC —sransit and the buses shall be operated by competent employees in a careful nnanaer. 4. Establishw^_nt of Routes, Services, Fares 6 Selection of Buses. Mraga shall establish routes, level of service and fare structures, with advice and counsel of AC Transit, as set forth in Exhibit A attached here— to and made a part Lereof. The routes, levels of service and fare strum tures contained in Exhibit A may be changed frog time to time by moraga with the consent of AC Transit. 'It is understood that"raga shall R establish routes and levels of service consistent with AC Transit's labor agreecents,safety regulations, street configurations and the .monies available pursuant to this agreement. It is understood and agreed that the routes, levels of service, and fare structures contained in E Exhibit A shall ba changed by mutual consent of the parties, if the sanies anticipated pursuant to this agreement are not forthcoming. S. Marketing a public Information, AC Transit will provide marketing and public information services, including the publication and distribution of timetables, in the same manner as it pezfo_-ms these services for its other operations, and shall eooriinate said cervices i with similar type services provided by t:oraga. 6. Litigation s told Rarmlcs9. AC Transit will investigate, process, settle and defend, as necessary, all'claims and suits arising out of the operation of the local bus service. AC Transit shall bold r=aga harmless from any and 211 claims arising out of the services here— in provided. AC Transit will include'toraga as an additional named in— t. 00160 irJ i ! lit &=C;l oa its excess inzur2ace policies for public liability, property } I das,oge and workmen's co=pcnsation. SC Transit shall keep Nara3a apprized of any and all uettlem+ents =ado in connection with all clafas processed or litigated to a conclusion. 7. Mrtrnaolitan Transuortation Cez"ission. AC Transit will #(j prepare and file necessary docuxnts and supporting mteriaL with the 8atropolitan Transportation Co=ission to obtain the maxima's funds avail— [ able under the Transportation Development Act of 1971 (SU 32S), for local lid.• bus service in the area of loraga. Such Tal funds shall be paid directly to AC Transit and noraga shall be credited accordingly. S. Grant Fund Applications. AC Transit will prepare and file appropriate applications for federal financial assistance with the Urban Mass Transportation Administration, or otb2r appropriate federal agencies, to obtain operating assistance and purchase necessary new buses and other capital equip_ent for the operation of the local buz service provided for s in this agreement. Such applications for Roraga's local bus service may f t be separate applications, or included in one or more of AC Transit's ap— plications for federal financial assistance in its entire operation. Such federal funds shall be paid directly to AC Transit and Moraga shall be credited accordingly. 9. Other Financial Assistance. AC Transit and lioraga agree to actively see], any additional funding sources that may become available through federal or state action, and available for the type of service provided for in this agreement. 10. Paym*nt by norana. Subject to the provisions of Sections 7 and 8 above, Mraga shall pay AC Transit for providing local bus service referred to in this agrcc=kcnt as follow: (a) prior to the cosencement of the local bus service, AC Transit will prepare'and submit to the Metropolitan Transportation 3. ©0161 a •r Cosraiss£on a request for rcimburzeacnt out or Transportation revclopmcnt i Act fur-d2. actual 3a1or and material costs incurred by poraga and AC - i 10. and a above, t:oraga 51-11 pay AC Transit for providing local bus service referred to in this agreement as follows- (a) Prior to the c---cement of the local bus service, AC Transit will prepare and submit to the Metropolitan Transportation 3. 00161 t� f. . f cosai55fon a request for reimbursement out of Transportation Develop-.eat f Act funds, actual labor and material costs incurred by xoraga and AC' t Transit in preparing for the start-up of service provided by this a,zce— ac=t. (b) Subsequent to the commencement of the local bus service, xoraga agrees to pay directly to AC Transit 2taraga-s share of tha followln;_: direct labor costs of bus drivers, including fringe benefit^. and standby belp, required to furnish the local bus service to t:eraga. In addition, Y.oraga shall pay its share for bus maintenance and servicing costs on the !r basis of the mileage incurred in providing the local bus service mul- tiplied by the system-wide reale incurred for these maintenance and r servicing costs incurred by AC Transit. Roraga will also pay its share to AC Transit for indirect cost5'on the same basis that AC Transit incurs these casts system-vide with respect to the previously mentioned direct f labor costs of bus drivers and the bus maintenance and servicing costs. Interest charges for any working capital advanced by AC Transit shall be accrued as an operating expense of roraga's local bus service, said charges being alproved as direct costs. Interest charges will be based upon the average interest earned on AC Transit invest=ents during the applicable period. (c) AC ,Transit shall establish and maintain a record of actual drivers' pay hours and c£loage incurred in the operation of the sys-tem. AC Transit will invoice :-raga each month for the estimated charges for the following =onto, representing that portion not covered by?edaral or Transportation Develoement Act reeds olxrlting subsidies. Ya�ga will reimburse AC Transit within fifteen (15)'days of receipt of invoice- E {d} Periodically. but not less than annually, AC Transit shall Prepare and submit to MOraga a statement of the actual costs resulting from the applicatioa of the formula set forth in sub-paragraph (b) above, 4. 00162 ( t and settlements between the parties shall be made at that time. (o) At the conclusion of clic first six months of operation of the system, either party msy request a review of the paymant provisians f of this agreement, and thereafter the parties nay mutually agree upon a revision of the compensation provisions to be effective for the remain- f ing term of this agreement, and may further agree to annual reviews there- after. Such revicus are intended to insure the parties that the basis of reimbursement accurately reflects the true costs to AC Transit of perfo-- ing the services pursuant to this agreement. F 11. Accountinq of Revenues. All applicable revenues derived t! from the operation of the local bus service shall be accounted for by AC Transit and credited to Y.oraga. Such revenues include, but are not � limited to, fares, co=ute tic%cts, and advertising revenue. ; .12. Records 6 Inspection. AC Transit shall maintain complete and detailed records of the operation of the local bus service which t &hall be open for inspection by roraga and its representatives, and } much personnel of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration, vetro- politan Tra.sportation Co_^_.ission, or other federal or state agencies as {{t may be authorized or required to make such inspections. 13. Co=:--Pcc=ert Date. This agreement shall co:r...ence after approval of the Town Council of raraga, and the Board of Directors of AC Transit, and shall continue in force until terminated pursuant to this agreement. 14. Ten, & Tornir.2tion. This agrcexnt shall remain in full force and effect until either party terminates this agreeeent by giving SIX=nth=' prior written notice to the other. Upon termination of this agreement in writing by either party, AC Transit shall submit an invoice t to Y.oraga in an amount which represents the cost of operating the local t bus service to the effective date of such termination. This agreement S. - - i 00163 rs • t Is contingent upon tha receipt of financial contributions from tho i Fed;ral Govern-cet and the Mtropolitan Transportation Cocaission. lhraga may Lcrninato this agreement if funds from the above sources f are not sufficient to provide the level of service.substantially as set y forth in Exhibit A. or any modifications thereof acceptable to Moraga and AC Transit. ' 15. rn3enen3ent contractors. This is an agrcexnt between in- dependent contractors and is not intended, and shall not be construed, as creating the relationship of agent, servant, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Force Y,aieurc Clause. In the event of exigencies such as fire, strike, major calamity, consequences of foreign or do--stic wars, Act of cod, or any cause beyond the control of the parties which will prevent the operation of the local bus service, at the option of either j party the local bus service may be suspended during the period required t!t to correct the cause or repair the dosage. 17. C000cration Between Parties. Moraga and AC Transit shall take all steps necessary to expedite the imple=eatation of this agreement. naraga shall cooperate in the establislr-ent of bus stops, bus stop zones, {{{!!! appropriate storage facilities, if necessary, and in othar matters of mutual concern. 18. Joint Filing By Parties. Both parties shall jointly file, F when appropriate, all documents necessary to receive fuel allocations and financial assi-stance with the federal, state or local agencies having jurisdiction thereof. Both parties shall further cooperate jointly where sucb cooperation is required to operate-tha"local bus service. 19. Disposition of Equi!rint. Moraga and AC Transit agree that in the event thisrcemcat is terminated they hey shall mutually 6-- - - -- 00164 O determine upon a fair and equitable basis the disposition of the buses mad otl.or capital equipcont, or the proceeds fro= the sale thereof, utilized in the service provided for heroin, taking into account the interest and authority of the Federal Governsant and the financial con- tribution of moraga. 20. Notices b Issues. official notices and co=unieations with respect to this agreement shall be made between the Toga Manager of moraga and the General Manager of AC Transit. Whenever =utual agreement is re- quired pursuant to the provisions of this agreezent, or the areas of re- sponsibility, authority or lines of communication between Tam staff ae- Ac Transit staff require clarification, the Tawn:tanager of moraga and the General Panagcr of AC Transit are hereby authorized to resolve the issue and may, if necessary, jointly sign an Agree_ent which shall be binding upon the parties. It is understood and a?recd that no substantive changes to this agreement shall be made without co:sent of Town Council of Eoraga. Il:WITNESS u:--R:O- the parties have hereunto set their hands the. day and year first above written. TOWN 03 MOMMA By Mayor By Town Clark AIAPMM-CO_".VA COSTA TRMASIT DISTRICT BY Alan L. Binghe=, Cenral Manager ATTEST Lawrence A. ftzenberg, Secretary APPROVED AS To POR". Robert E. Nisbet, Attorney 7. 00165 ' �;;J JJJ e� P � M• Y � 00 O rL. ' i to-o u t� w•� J � �f • =.al+rence A. pxen5er„ Secretary . APPROVED AS TO POfi: Robezt E. RisSet, :,ctorney 7. 00165 `I i0 N-O J v ti•' Y -a U. O O i � •P PPP P P ' ---� � O � �� Y Iu N U �J'� -0 0 0 0 V fit• i I .m Z Nr-O d illi �P �•VyV V V �� od e d o m st m Ij N'O d '� YPO V ► V V>rNj I �O UPJ d � 1 ].I� JMOO U V NVt�1. �' �•1_ V M t �� YJJJ J = 1 3 O N-G d i N• J-Od V t v00.� C O LV .Oi00d V V 0 3si_2�• 7n woeesr<v�t t� f Q?`c..n��cZ taG ua-: � r- �a E��t:�•` ao�'p �nn> 1 - N N LL Z. y t i INNNNN N N I j PP PO P Y I iJM N N N ♦ �I V a u P VPd M n. dV Cn O V r IM�r aN• = o fl-�„' .Pa�. i.m ^t. �i �1111.Y.u+uul �1 I Ll v 1 V 4 ♦O V V �� /•� j0 t V N d � � •�4 •O J V N 1 � N'IrI J� •I v V o u•• �f oo Oo o �o _ M J �yl •O � \oi•o Li V 00 a > II > !O♦ O�y J Y. t P> :0> \t N may; JyV�.O t M r.l i1 Tt 1' i 0016'5 In the Board- of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 1976 In the Matter of Rental Agreement for County-Owned . House, 1379 El Curtola, Walnut Creek. W.O. 5252-926 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement, dated August 17, 1976, with Rodolfo Garza for rental of County-owned property at 1379 Curtola, Walnut Creek, on a month-to-month, as-is basis at a rate of $225.00 per month commencing October 1, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Sea!of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this7th day of September 79 76 --- Real Property Division County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By - Deputy Cleric Jean L. +1411ler If-24 34176 tSm 00167 r i i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7, i9 76 In the!Natter of Agreement with JHK and Associates for Consulting Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with JHK and Associates for a special traffic study in connection with an environmental impact report for rezoning 1992-RZ at a cost not to exceed $2000, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement, to be paid out of funds advanced by the applicant. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of CC: Supervisors ' JHK and Associates c/o Planning 7th September.Director of Planning -of fed this day ofT976 County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OLSS0111, Clerk Byt/-L- i1 : ✓ Deputy Clerk ;nary 0016.8 { 7 i COIISULTIiIG SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Special Conditions. These sRecial conditions are incorporated below by reference: . (a) consultant's flame & Address: J11K and Associates 275 - Sth Street, San Francisco, California 94103 (b) Effective Date: September 1, 1976 (c) Project 11ame, Number, & Location:- Special Traffic Study Report for Rezoning 1992-RZ, "Baywood" (d) Payment Limit: S2,000 (TF10 THOUSAND DOLLARS) 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUii ' OF CONTRA COSTA COMU(LTTAUT / f By✓ vS r.� ' / J,-P. Kenn �;.�;�C_ 1, 1l I i r �A-11", C�,�_ ifs F L�T `a'rman, Board of uper sors Designate official capacity in business) : ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOU, (CORPORATE SEAL) County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of State of California ) ss the Coard Contra Costa County ) AMIOWLEDGME11T By y�:':c • C�/Lli��r The person(s) signing above for Consul- Deputy Craig i tant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally RecomneTded by: t appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they signed it and that the / , corporation or partnership named above An�thon� A. Drh s executed it. (`Direct orlof; lanning Form approved: Date: John B. Clausen County Counsel / _, .� �� •rrinnnuanr Notary U_ �1C os�tCLiL SEAL By� c •y '+�L\ SONNI E. KRODER Deputy (NOTARY EAL�1�ir�� CITY &C runuc cnusoanu �'✓ ir L OUYLY OF 5",iRARCISCO AI,h.•••ifsbw L•P:r,f WICA 7J.1477 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County and the above-name"8:'`7'$..'rII Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. County hereby employs Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of Service shall be as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall , at no expense to the County, furnish certificates or other- evidence acceptable to the County of (a) public liability insurance of at least 5250,000.00 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least 5500,000.00 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of riot less than 550,000.00. Thirty days' notice to County of policy lapse or cancel- lation is required. 7. Payment. The County shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shain in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allo=wed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Section 1(d) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Director of Planning. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted subsequent to acceptance by the Director of Planning of the Final Consultant Draft, as indicated in Appendix "A". Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of the statement. "'- 00169 f 8. Termination. At its option, County.may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination Consultant agrees to deliver to the County everything pertaining to the work in the possession of Consultant or under its control at that time, and will be paid, except as provided below, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due for services rendered to the date of termination. If the Consultant is in default at the time of termination, County may complete the work (scope of service) and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the fee and from any funds otherwise due and payable to the Consultant. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not to be considered an employee of the County. 10. Exclusive Services. Consultant agrees to restrict its firm and its subcontractors from any employment, other than for the County, in any way pertaining to the sub- ject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of .two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment. Consultant further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with its subcontractors. 11. Status of Product. It is understood that the final Consultant draft accepted by the County will be utilized as background or source material by the Planning Department for its exclusive use, all or in part, as it sees fit. The Consultant agrees not to release, disclose or otherwise make available copies of its written documents, their contents, any views or opinions contained therein, or any-other written or oral material, data, views, opinions or other information in any way. arising out of or connected with the subject of this employment to other than the Planning Department without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such disclosure. ABJ:dh Attachments: Appendix "A" Appendix "B" -2- ©01'70 .1• A - APPENDIX "A" Consultant shall prepare a report analyzing the potential traffic impacts resulting from completion of the project identified in l(c) above, and as more particularly described in the attached proposal which is incorporated herein by reference. The report shall be prepared in the format specified by the County. It shall be single spaced and suitable for duplication by office copier methods. The Consultant shall prepare the report in a "working draft" form initially and submit 3 copies for Planning Department review, not later than September 14, 1976. After Planning Department reviews and comments on the draft, the Consultant shall revise the working draft report in accordance with such comments and submit one copy of a "final Consultant draft" for review and acceptance by the Plan- ning Department, no later than September 23, 1976. Assistance of County staff required by the Consultant in the gather- ing of data to complete this report shall be limited to the supplying of source documents on County premises. No compiling of data will be done by County staff. All other County staff support effort will be limited to that specifically enumerated below: NONE In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Appendix "A" and the attached Consultant's proposal relative to County staff effort in the completion of this report, the provisions of the Appendix shall prevail. ABJ:dh 00171 APPENDIX "A" SPECIAL TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT REZONING APPLICATION 1992-RS, "BAYWOOD" PROPOSED SCOPE OF SERVICES JIIK & Associates (JHK) proposes to provide the professional services described in detail below in preparation of a Special Subject Report related to traffic generation and associated impacts of the subject rezoning application, 1992-RS, "BA3mOOD". The Report will supplement, expand, update and correct information contained in the traffic circulation section of the Environmental Impact Report dated May 28, 1976, prepared by County staff from informational material submitted for the applicant by Dennis Klien Associates (December 1975). The proposed scope of services is based on the County's Request For Proposal, discussions with the County staff, review of the Enviornmental Impact Report and JHK's familiarity with the subject project area. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services to be provided fall into three main areas. These are; 1) validation of base data (1974) with respect to traffic volumes and highway geometries, 2) assesment of trip generation and distribution of traffic from the project site and reliability of 1990 forecasts, and 3) impact of project traffic on surrounding streets with emphasis on the safety aspects of the, site access and pedestrian and bicycle accident hazard on the adjacent streets. Each main work area comprises several tasks which are set forth below. BASE DATA VALIDATION Information in the EIR with respect to street widths and the suitability of 1968 traffic count data for preparing 1974 volume estimates has been questioned by local residents. JHK will validate the street width data by field measurement. The 1974 Average Daily Traffic (AAT) estimates will be checked for reasonableness. To that end at least three peak period manual traffic counts will be performed. Counts will be a minimum of two hour duration and will be conducted at following intersections. . Reliez Valley Road at Cloria Terrace. . Reliez Valley Road at Whithers Avenue. 00172 Taylor Boulevard at Whithers Avenue. Based on the peak period volumes, estimates of ADT and current directional distribution of traffic will be prepared. The intent of this task is to assess the accuracy and reason-. ableness of the information presented for 1974 in the EIR. Develop- ment of a current (1976) traffic volume base is beyond the scope of this proposal. TRAFFIC FORECASTS The generation and distribution of project related traffic will be assessed independently by J.H.K. Particular attention will be paid to the distribution of trips between Reliz Valley Road, Whithers Avenue and Gloria Terrace. The rationale supporting the distribution will be fully documented in the report and will be based on the observed traffic patterns, the street network configuration and model generated traffic distributions developed as part of LUTS. As part of this task the 1990 forecasts will be checked against the later LUTS diversion forecasts. Of particular concern is the reliability of the socio-economic data underlying the forecasts for the census tracts in the project vicinity. TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND MITAGATIONS Impact of project traffic on the adjacent streets will be assessed as part of this task. Local residents are particularly concerned about increased traffic on Gloria Terrace and pedestrian and bicycle safety in the general area. Potential increase in ' traffic hazard will be the focus of the impact review. Traffic volumes are generally low enough in the project vicinity to pre- clude any significant congestion effects. Assessment of the operational and safety features of the project access road inter- section with Reliez Valley Road is included in this task. Mitigation measures to be specifically addressed include provision of separate pedestrian and bicycle facilities parallel to Reliez Valley Road, possible widening on Reliez Valley Road and Gloria Terrace and improvement of sight distance longitudi- ually and at intersections along both streets. Other possible measures will be identified if indicated. REPORT PREPARATION The investigations, findings, conclusions and recommendations resulting from the tasks discussed above will by embodied in a report formatted as specified in the County's RFP_ A working . 00173 draft of the report will be submitted for County review by September 14, with submission of the final draft by September 23, 1476. COUNTY PARTICIPATION County participation in the study will be limited to the - provision of pertinent files and documents, as described below and- performance of timely review of the working draft report as stated in the R.F.P. In addition, JHK expects to discuss proposed County roadway projects in the area, if any, with appropriate personnel in Planning and Public Works. JHK expects to have access to the following documents and files: . The original information submittal by Dennis Klien Associates. The traffic volume file maintained by the County Traffic Engineer. . The traffic accident record file,.accident.spot map and spot map photos also kept by the Traffic Engineer. JHK will abstract and summarize the appropriate data from the above files. 00174 APPENDIX 'B' JHH ASSOCIATES STANDARD LABOR RATES These rates apply to personnell who will be involved with the proposed Special Study for Contra Costa County Rezoning Applica- tion 1992-RS, 'HAYWOOD". These rates include all overhead and incidental expense. NAME TITLE HOURLY RATE Robert W. Hubenette Vice-President 65 Benjamin H. Goff Transportation Planner 35 Ray A. Moe Tranportation Analyst 25 Technician/Clerical 13 00175 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stcite of California September 7 , i9 76 In the Matter of - Contract :22-048-2 with James J. O'Donnell for Provision of Occupational Alcoholism Consultation Services during FY 1976-77 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute contract #22-048-2 with James J. O'Donnell, self-employed consultant, to provide occupational alcoholism consultation services for the continued development and implementation of a comprehensive alcoholism education and treatment program for County employees, for the term August 1, 1976, through June 30, 1977, with a contract payment limit of $16,570, in accordance with the County Alcoholism Plan and Program Budget for FY 1976-77, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Orib: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts S Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 7t!1 day of Sentember 1976 County Auditor-Controller County Health Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Acting County Alcoholism �J Administrator By ��i/ii,.. . ( tet-.��c! , Deputy Clerk Contractor � Cr•ai -' a,r RJP:dg H•24;I;C.!Sm 00175 Contra Costa County Standard Fora STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) r 1. Contract Identification. ,lumber iQ 40 — 0 Department: health (AIRS) Subject: Occupational Alcoholism Consultation Services for the development and implementation of a comprehensive alcoholism education and treatment program for employees of the County of Contra Costa 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: JAMES J. O'DONNELL Capacity: Self-employed Occupational Alcoholism Program Consultant Address: 148 bodges Drive, Horaga, California 94556 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is August 1, 1976, and it terminates June 30, 1977 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 16,570 5. Countv's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Alcoholism Plan and Program Budget FY 1976-77, and any modifications or revisions thereof. 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Welfare and Institutions Code, Division 11 California Government Code Section 31006 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By JPKenny titi . . By hairman, Bo rd dYSupervisors .triGlv�.- (Dsign, official cipacity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) /i State of California ) ss. ByCounty of Contra Costa ) a cig Deputy ACOOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Department known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared 4,�74;� before me today and acknowledged that he/ By they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Form Approved: County Counsel Dated: fy?b Deputy yDeputy C unty Clerk 00�!*77 ROBERT I PROCTOR J 1 DEPUTY COUNV CLERK (A-4617 REV 6/76) Microfilmed vAth boord Orde( Ccntro costa County.,Califomio ` i Contra Costa County Standard Form S Y a PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) t Number 2 2 — " " 8 _ 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions County will pay Contractor the following fee: i g Ym [Check one alternative only.] ( ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b• $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses s provided or incurred by Contractor hereunder. N [X] d. $ 1,400 monthly, plus the reasonable cost of authorized expenses actually incurred hereunder (not to exceed $1,170 for the term of this Contract) for mileage, travel and per diem expenses, including expenses a for attendance at professional conferences and training seminars. 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 1. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, r County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 1 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to y furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or a document its demand(s) for payment_ 1 _ , { 4. Audit Eticeotions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. a i i Y f 7 T t -00� t8 (A-4619 REV 6/76) .' z SERVICE PL.Ii"J Number 2 2 — 0 4 8 2 i 1. Service. Contractor shall provide for County certain professional consultation and technical assistance services to assist County in the development and implementation of a comprehensive alcoholism education and treatment program for persons employed by County. Contractor shall work an average of 40 hours per week under this Contract in providing these occupational alcoholism services, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following activities: a. County Policy Statement. Contractor shall complete development of the proposed County policy statement on occupational alcoholism begun under Contract $22-048, as follows: (1) Contractor shall meet and confer with the appropriate administrative staff and heads of County offices, agencies, and departments to ' obtain their approval of the proposed County policy statement. (2) Contractor shall meet and confer with the appropriate representatives L of County employee unions and groups to obtain their approval of the proposed County policy statement. (3) Contractor shall submit to the County Health Officer, on or before f October 29, 1976, said approved County policy statement in the final form of Board Resolution for possible presentation to the County Board of Supervisors for adoption. r b. Employee Counseling Program. Contractor shall further develop and partially implement the comprehensive alcoholism education and treatment program for employees of the County of Contra Costa, also known as the Employee Counseling Program, begun under Contract r22-048. Contractor shall: i (1) Continue to identify the services which are presently available to County employees with problems of alcohol abuse, to determine the needed services which are not available, and to devise plans for making such needed services available within the context of a system- wide comprehensive alcoholism education and treatment program for County employees. (2) Conduct in-service training sessions for employee supervisors and union shop stewards in the various County offices, agencies, and departments on the recognition, prevention, identification, and treatment of alcoholism and alcohol abuse among County employees. a (3) Develop and distribute educational and informational materials regarding occupational alcoholism and the operation of the Employee Counseling Program. i (4) Provide information, consultation and referral services to employee supervisors, employees, and employee union representatives from County offices, agencies, and departments on a continuously available basis, as necessary to accommodate the service needs of such persons regarding occupational alcoholism and problems of alcohol abuse. (5) Provide pre-treatment counseling for County employees requesting help and refer such persons to appropriate treatment and counseling services. (6) Explore possible long-range funding alternatives for the continued and permanent operation of a comprehensive alcoholism education and a { treatment program for County employees. c. Outside Consultation. Contractor shall provide occasional consultation as prescribed by County to private industry, community groups, and other public agencies in Contra Costa County regarding occupational alcoholism and alcohol abuse and the development of education and treatment programs for their employees. Initials: opntractor County Dept. -1- 00179 t . 4 SERVICE PLA, 9 (� /� (� Gj !:umber !22 y 0 `�C O W N r d. Additional Services. Contractor shall provide additional consultation and technical assistance services regarding occupational alcoholism as may be prescribed from time to time by the County Health Officer or her designee. e. Service Guidelines. Subject to and insofar as not inconsistent with this Service Plan, Contractor shall provide the above services in accordance with the r program goals, objectives, policies, and other such guidelines set forth in the following described document: "Contra Costa County Occupational Alcoholism Program," a proposal submitted by Alcoholism Information and Rehabilitation Services, Contra Costa County f Health Department, June 24, 1975 (27 pages) 2. Independent Status. Contractor is an independent contractor and County shall neither direct nor have control over Contractor, his activities, or the methods and details by which he fulfills his obligations under this Contract. In providing services hereunder, Contractor shall work cooperatively with the County Health Officer or her designee. g 3. Quarterly Performance Reports. Contractor shall submit regular written Performance Reports quarterly to the Administrator of the Health Department's Alcohol Information and Rehabilitation Services (AIRS), detailing Contractor's accomplishments in performing the above services. The AIRS Administrator shall be responsible for 4 evaluating Contractor's performance under this Contract. 4. Activity Support Services. County shall provide for Contractor certain office space, clerical support, office supplies and services, materials, equipment, facilities, and assistance as may be mutually determined to be necessary to support Contractor's activities hereunder, but excluding the use of County cars. 5. Expenses. Contractor's fee, as set forth in Paragraph l.d, of the Payment Provisions, includes full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided or incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including all travel, mileage, and per diem expenses. SPECIAL CONDITIONS r 1. Insurance. Paragraph 19. (Insurance), page 3, of the General Conditions is hereby deleted and replaced by a new paragraph to read as follows: "19. Insurance. a. Automobile Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of motor vehicle liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, for any use Contractor makes of a private automobile in the performance of this Contract, as required by State law and in amounts not less than: (1) $15,000 for personal injury to, or death of, one person; (2) $30,000 for injury to, or death of, two or more persons, per occurrence; and (3) $10,000 for property damage. b. Insurance Certificate. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, Contractor shall provide County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above-specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under Contractor's insurance policies." Initials: kntractoboDept. �UU • -2- 9 Contra Costa County - Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Complaince with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. (A-4616_ REV 6/76) -1- 00181 1 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616 REV 6176) -2- ©0182 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) • 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts S Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. (A-4616 REV 6/76) -} 001 83 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 1976 In the Matter of Agreement with the Contra Costa County Development Association IT I5 BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the Contra Costa County Development Association for services in promoting economic development, during the period from September 1, 1976 through August 31, 1977, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Contra Costa County affixed this 7th day of September . 1976 Development Association County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Cleric By, %7i1s !�� ,�s Deputy Clerk ,� v ram 00184 Atii+�:'•:hffZPP IIM irip EPSInp.; Ti,&E & COiFEFCE, E'iY:. 1. Parties & Lute. Effective on September 1, 11976, the CQUfflY OI' WMA CWTA and the C01-I A 'e1 LYY.11' DERECMOR ASy'OCIATIOM, a California nen-profit corporation, mutually prari:e mid ao-ee as fall=. 2. Purpose & Authority. Pursuant to Goveisment Code Section 26100, The Comity Board of Supervisors is authorized to expend funds for such thugs as Inducing iiudgratlen to and increasing the trade and commerce of the County, and advertising, exhibiting, exploiting, and ranking ]mown its resources including its agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, Tmtneral, industrial, commercial, climatic, educational, recreational, artistic, musical, cultural, and other resources or advantages; and the Developnnent Association is expeit at doinng these thing. 3. Services. The Development Association will continue to perfb m.the following se crv3 o the County: a. Assist (bounty to accumulate data acid provide information to citizens helping to attract and encou are pro:.rective residents and business firm to locate in the Comity. b. Pm.wv a ccn:przhensive sttW and survey of the County's resources relating to agriculture, inxiustr3, trade and commerce. c. Assist In the promotion of tourism and in the attraction of conventions and recreational, artistic, musical and cultural events to the County. d. Publicize the County's resources, advantages mid opportunities for capital investment in Contra Costa County. e. Provide and publish economic data on the County's resources, and make such data available to pim-rective urisitors, residents and business firms. f. Encoujr_e trade and caimerre in the County, 'arid cooperate, assist and advise other organimticiris and public bodies to accanplish this purpose. g. Assist the American Revolution Bicentennial Committee of contra costa county with development and implementation of bicentennial activities. 4. Can en:+ation. Comity will pay Development Association for these services $128,510 in uzithly poyrentts, after receiving billings frost the Association. 'life Association shall provide the Comity with quarterly operating statements reporting all. receipts and expenditures u" f`zA3. lbe County My examine the Association's boolm and records at any time ccncelmlM the matters covered by this agreement. 5. 'rem. ift?:: :i€mxinpant io'*t%m September 1, 1976 to AW.,ust 31, 1977, both inclusive. Co•.:nty --ay at :etr brie it:r kmlately terudniatc this contract if, in its sole 3udgient, the DevielopmerM :L-.-cclaticin Is rwt :.atlsf'actorilti performinnp%atnd it may without cause terminate it ai 31') dsyr. prior written notice to the Development Association, and the Association .•a1t•az all ;Avmitcints after either such to rdnmtion. COLI.M LTV COMMA A LEYELAPp�IM AASSOCIAMCK By_ J. P. Kenny 1e � Y-.1% Pr d—oluent t. R. i.+ ty dellex officio Clerkr Supery cors B1 ^, L�epiit�' [Amocetaticn's Corporate SEAL] AW GaiO Porvi pea;-aiaxi i•:• !::.nmity icxutrel 00185 1m-.4 1.4t, t nord oma. I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on ) Appeal of L. Moody and ) S. Erring from Planning ) Commission Conditional Approval ) September 7, 1976 of Final Development Plan ) No. 3022-76 and Tentative flap ) for Subdivision 4878, Diablo/ ) Danville Area. ) Blackhawk Development Company, ) Applicant. ) This being the time fixed for hearing on the appeal of Mrs. Linda Moody and Mrs. Sally Ewing with respect to the Planning Commission conditional approval of the 206-unit Final Development Plan No. 3022-76 and tentative map for Subdivision 4878, Diablo;, Danville area, filed by the Blackhawk Development Company; and The appeal in this matter having been filed prior to the commission's final determination on these matters but was deemed filed after such final determination in order to avoid the need of appellants to refile; and This Board having before it the August 18, 1976 report (with attachments) from its Director of Planning, the 4 Volume final Environmental Impact Report and the other materials, exhibits and documents available to the Planning Commission on the tentative map for Subdivision 4878 and the final Development Plan for the Preliminary Development Plan referred to as 1995-RZ being L.U.P. 3022-76; and The Board having received an August 31, 1976 letter from Mrs. Linda A. Moody, Attorney at Law, P. 0. Box 635, Diablo, California 94528 advising of her desire to withdraw from said appeal; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having recommended that the Board consent to the withdrawal of Mrs. Moody from said appeal; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Dias is APPROVED. Chairman J. P. Kenny having declared the hearing open on the appeal of Mrs. Sally Ewing; and Attorney Phillip Berry, representing Mrs. Ewing, having advised that the appeal is based on the premise that the Planning Commission had failed to comply with Government Code Section 66474.6 and County Ordinance Section 26-2.2404 and calling attention to his client's contention that said Commission had approved the Development Plan and tentative subdivision map prior to making required "findings of fact"; and Fir. Berry having requested therefore that the Board reverse the decision of the Planning Commission; and Chairman J. P. Kenny having asked if any other persons wished to speak in favor of the appeal and no other person asked to be heard; and 00186 a Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having asked County Counsel if he felt that all legal requirements had been met by the Commission; and Mr. J. B. Clausen, County Counsel, having responded in the affirmative; and Mr. D. Van Voorhis, attorney for the Blackhawk Development Company, having concurred with County Counsel's opinion and the Planning Commission's determination; and Mr. Owen Schwaderer, representing Blackhawk Development Company, having summarized the project, the actions of Blackhawk to elicit public input and acquire the support of the community for this project; and Mr. Berry, in rebuttal, having restated the basis for the appeal; and No one else having appeared, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing is closed and September 21, 1976 at 11:15 a.m. is fixed as the time for decision thereon and that resolutions to grant or deny the appeal be on hand for Board consideration. PASSED by the following vote of the Board on September 7, 1976: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CERTIFIED COPY I CUtlfy tLat this Is a full, true k correct copy of the original document whicb it on file in my otfice. and that it was passed & adopted by the Board of Bnperrtwn of Contra Costa County, California, on the data shown.ATTEST: J. IL OLSSON. County Clerk A exofficto Clerk of said Board of superrlsors, by Deputy Clerk. nn SEP 71976 cc: Mrs. L. A. Moody _ Mrs. Sally Ewing Mr. Phillip Berry Mr. D. Van Voorhis Blackhawk Development Company County Counsel Director of Planning Supervisor W. N. Boggess 00187 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7, , 19 76 In the Matter of Agreement with the City of Richmond for Geologic Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the City of Richmond to provide geologic services to the city on a cost reimbursement basis, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: Supervisors City of Richmond c10 ?lannino � this 7th day of September 1976 Director of Planning � County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OISSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Vary" Crate 00188 GEOLOGIC SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Parties. Effective on SEP 7 1976, the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "County" and the City of Richmond, hereinafter referred to as "City," mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Purpose & County Services_ This Agreement is to provide for _ the performance of geologic services by the County for the City, primarily pursuant to the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. Services are provided subject to the availability of County staff. Services to be performed by the County, Planning Department and its geologist include but are not limited to those described as follows: A. "Review and Evaluation". The County shall review geologic reports at the request of the City such as those required by the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act. This could include field checking and other necessary research and verifi- cation. B. Reports. The County shall prepare and submit to the City a report detailing its investigations, results and recommendations. C. Testimony. Subject to the request of the City, the County shall attend and testify at public hearings relative to the County's investigations, results and recommendations. D. Advice. The County shall provide other related technical advice to the City when requested if County staff are available to handle such requests when made. 3. Cooperation. Officers, agents and employees of the City and the County shall give each other all cooperation and assistance necessary to perform the provisions of this Agreement. City hereby designates the Director of Public Works as its repre- sentative to coordinate with, and provide directions (requests for services, etc.) to the County Planning Department pursuant to this Agreement. 4. Charge for Services. City shall pay the County its costs of performing work pursuant to this Agreement. The County charge for employees engaged in performing work shall include: A. Salaries. B. Fringe benefits. C. Departmental and Countywide general and administrative costs. D. Any other significant costs agreed upon by both parties will be incurred and billed at the actual cost. E. The County billing rate (charge) is $23.93 per hour %chich reflects A, B, and C above. County may increase -1- M¢crofilmed with board order 00189 the rate effective 30 days from date of notification to the city unless City terminates this Agreement as provided herein. 5. Billing and Payment. County shall keep records on all services performed and render a statement to the City for the costs of any service provided upon the completion thereof. City shall pay the County the amount due within 30 days after receipt of the statement. 6. Term and Termination. This agreement will remain in force and effect until terminated. This Agreement may be terminated by - thirty (30) days prior written notice served by either party upon the other. Upon termination, the County shall be paid all amounts due for services rendered prior to the date of termination. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CITY OF RICHMOND By: -nn _ Ch i an, BoardnC rvisors Mayor ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOnty Clerk ATTEST: and ex-officio Clerke Board of Supervisors By: City Clerk.// By: �crl Deputy ,, Craig i Approved as to form: Recommen ed by: ,city Attorney rectbr of Pl ng Form Approved: JOHN B. CIAUSEN, County Counsel By: Deputy -2- 00190 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Approving Amendment to Lease, Orinda Community Center County Service Area R-6 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is authorized to execute the Amendment to Lease between the County of Contra Costa, lessor and Fountain- head-Montessori Nursery School, lessee. The Amendment to Lease amends the lease dated July 1, 1975 previously approved by this Board and provides for additional space requirements on a month to month rental of $125.00 commencing August 15, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originating Dept: Public Works (SAC) Supervisors cc: Public forks Director (2) affixed this 7th day of September--, 19 76 County Administrator County Auditor County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ./e, , Deputy Clailk Jean L f tiller AMENDMENT TO LEASE (Fountainhead-Montessori Nursery School - CSA R-6) 1. Parties and Purpose: Effective on �,Aucnzrst 15 1976, the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called COUNTY, for and on behalf of COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-6, and FOUNTAINHEAD-MONTESSORI NURSERY SCHOOL, a corporation, hereinafter called LESSEE, hereby amend their lease dated July 1, 1975 covering certain real property located within the Orinda Union School building known and designated as 24 Orinda Way, Orinda, California, described as Classrooms No. 11 and 12, as follows: 2. Amendment: A. Paragraph 2 ("DESCRIPTION") is amended by adding the follow- Ing at the end of said Paragraph: ", and Office Room 'A' (26 Orinda Way)." B. Paragraph 3 ("TERM") is amended by adding the following at the end of said Paragraph: "Office Room 'A' premises shall be rented on a month-to-month basis beginning August 15, 1976." C. Paragraph u ("RENTAL") is amended by adding the following after subparagraph (c) : "(d) One Hundred Twenty-five Dollars ($125.00) per month for Office Room 'A' , beginning August 15, 1976" 3. Effect: Except for the amendments agreed to herein, the Lease Agreement of July 1, 1975 remains in full force and effect. COUNTY: LESSEE: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California By By Gaa I rrinan, Board= of j$uoervisors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSO111 Clerk z By �j�`,._, �` f,_, tDesignaie official capacity Deputy in the Business) RECOi>ZiENDEJ FOR APPROVAL By ��.� �. .� � �c: 00102 County Administrator Page 1 of 2 Miaofilnw-d with lrG, d aid5z Y Alichooncs D -.-service Area Coordinator fa4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Deputy y{ Page 2 df.9 1 _ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7, ' 19 76 In the Matter of Agreement with JHK and Associates for Consulting Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with JHK and Associates for parking and circulation Consulting Services in connection with the preparation of the environmental impact report for the planned Contra Costa County Detention Facility at a cost not to exceed $6560, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea{of the Board of CC: Supervisors JHK. and Associates c/o Plannotffd this th day of Sentember 1976 Director of Planning County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OISSO,*,J, Clerk r� By �/7i <<<.. Deputy Clerk Mary; raig 00194 UETENfION FACILITY SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Special Conditions. These special conditions are incorporated below by reference: (a) Consultant's Name Sic Address: JW&Associates,275 Fifth Street, San Francisco,California 94103. (b) Effective Date: September 7, 1976 (c) Payment Limit: Six Thousand Five Hundred Sixty Dollars ($6,560.00) 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties'agreement hereto: - COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CONSOLTANT p. Kenny Chairman,Bobrd of Signature Supervisors 1 Official Capacity in Business ATTEST: J.R.OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio (CORPORATE SEAL) Clerk of the Board State of California ) 'ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By7`l Z-Le e o Deput Dry The person(s)signing above for Consultant,known to me in those individual and business capacities, i4ommended j personally appeared before me today and acknow- ledged that lie/they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. r ntbony A.D 1haestis 1 V Director of Planning ( Date: Form approved: John B.Clausen / ._ii x.• c'`-�" County Counsel Notary Public ' fawn„to,nttu»i•ws••r:•r+mnt•mm�swm�u� _ OFFICML SM%L By — 60,%Nl E. KRODER :i NOTARY I'MIMCCALIFOR141A Putt nn a CWJM OFIVI FRAWJSCO o.uwuaswina.::•unusuw.s:cst•ww........ 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra•Costa County and the above-named Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. County hereby employs Consultant,and Consultant accepts such employment to perform the professional services described herein,upon the'terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of Service shall be as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall,at no expense to the County,furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to the County of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000.00 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000.00 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of riot less than $50,000.00. Thirty days' notice to County of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Payment shall be as specified in Appendix A except that County shall pay no more than 609c of Payment Litnit before delivery of Working Draft document for Courtly review and no more than 9U% of Payment Limit before approval by County of Completed Draf t. W=ofiimed with board order I 8. Termination. At its option, County may terminate this agreement at any tirne by written notice to the Consultant, whether or riot the Consultant is in default. Upon such termina- tion Consultant agrees to deliver to the County everything pertaining to the work in the possession of Consultant or under its control at that time, and will be paid, except as provided below, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due for services rendered to the date of termination. If the Consultant is in default at the time of termination, County may complete the work (scope of service) and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the fee and from any funds otherwise due and payable to the Consultant. 4. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not to be considered an employee of the County. _ 10, Exclusive Services. Consultant agrees to restrict its firm•and its subcontractors from any employment, other than for the County, in any way pertaining to the subject of this employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment. Consultant further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with its subcontractors. 11. Status of Product. It is understood that the final Consultant draft accepted by the County will be utilized as background or source material by the Planning Department for its exclusive use, all or in part,as it sees fit. The Comultant agrees not to release,disclose or otherwise make available copies of its written documents, their contents, any views or, opinions contained therein, or any other written or oral material, data, views, opinions or other information in any way arising out of or connected with the subject of this employment to other than the Planning Department without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such disclosure. 00,196 APPENDIX"A" Also incorporated herein and attached hereto for reference is Consultant's proposal dated September 1, 1976 with the following modifications: Contract Start September 7, 1976 First Draft October 29,1976 County Review November 8, 1976 Completed Draft November 22, 1976 Contract Finish November 30,1976 Consultant shall perform optional Traffic Counts ($800.00) } P R O P O S A L SPECIAL SUBJECT REPORT PARKING AND CIRCULATION ASPECTS OF THE CRIh1INAL JUSTICE DETENTION FACILITY Prepared for: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Prepared by: JHK & ASSOCIATES 275 Fifth Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Proposal 9960 September 1, 1976 00198 hk & associates James H_ Bell, president September 1, 1976 Proposal 9960 . Mr. Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planning CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT P. O. Boa 951 Martinez, California 94553 ATTENTION: Mr. Dale Sanders Planning Ecologist Dear Mr. Sanders: JHK & Associates is pleased to respond to your verbal request for proposal to prepare a Special Study Report on the traffic and parking aspects of the new Criminal Justice Detention Facility to be located in the County Civic Center in Martinez. The attached proposal covers the points raised in the meeting of August 17 between myself and representatives of the County Planning and Public works Departments. As discussed at that meeting, I will be Project Director for JHK, responsible for the day-to-day management of the project and most of the technical work. Assisting me will be tor. Ray Moe who just recently completed a parking and circulation study in downtown Santa Ana for that City's Redevelopment Agency. He was also heavily involved in the Contra Costa LUTS Program completed last summer. Mr. Robert Hubenette will be JHK Officer-in-Charge. If you have any questions about the proposal or desire additional information, please don't hesitate to call me at (415) 362-3141. Sincerely yours, �+ �.t:Lt��CG2"Vl.0�� � S Benjamin H. Goff Transportation Planner BHG/vzg Enclosures _'7a► filth Street - San Fran i.rsw.Califoruia 941w'. .11:51 36231.11 0U199 jhk.... . 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY _ JHK & Associates (JFIK) is pleased to respond to the County's request to conduct and prepare a Special Study Report on traffic and parking conditions in the County Civic Center area and the effect of constructing a new Criminal Justice Detention Facility as part of that complex. The Report will provide a source docu- ment from which the County will prepare portions of the project Environmental Impact Report, as well as supplying background information to support any traffic and parking analysis desired in the Civic Center area. The comprehensive scope of this study will insure its continuing usefulness and value to the County_ The Scope of Services proposed herein are based on those objectives, discussions with County staff, JfIF:'s experience with the previous Detention Facility project in particular, and general experience with a variety of parking, traffic and circulation studies. Information to be developed as part of this study falls into four areas: • Existing (197G) parking demand, traffic volumes and travel patterns in the Civic Center area. • Forecast parking demand and traffic volumes for an appropriate horizon year(s) . • Traffic generation and parking demand associated with the proposed Detention Facility and its role in the forecasts above. • Measures to mitigate adverse traffic and parking effects identified with the Civic Center generally and/or specifically with the Detention Facility project. JHK proposes to conduct the study on a two-level approach. •The first, or general level, addresses the Civic Center, of• which the Detention Facility would be a part, and the immediately adjacent area. All of the initial survey work and most of the analysis involved in the first three areas above may be undertaken 00200 jlik. 2 without precisely locating the Detention Facility within the Center. The second level focuses on specific parking and circula- tion effects of the facility as proposed for a particular site. The majority of the work effort will be incorporated in the first level analysis which may commence as soon as authorization to proceed is obtained from the County. As the site recommendation may not be made before mid-October, it is imperative that as much of the study as possible be accomplished by then since the draft Report must be to the County for review by November 1_ A detailed description of the work tasks and time estimates are contained in the following sections of this proposal. It should be noted that County staff participation will be required as part of this study. Staff involvement will include discussion with JHK of relevant background material, particularly data developed after preparation of the draft EIR for the previous project, and timely review of the project and report. In addition to review of the draft Report, JHK proposes a mid-October review meeting involving,a few selected persons from the County Planning and Public Works Departments to cover initial findings and conclusions front the general level analysis. J11K also expects the County to provide up to twenty 24-hour machine traffic counts_ This would involve approximately fifty traffic counter days. At the County's option, discussed further in Section 2, County staff may provide approximately 80 hours of manual traffic counts. 00201 3 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES J11K & Associates has divided the work effort into seven (7) tasks, each associated with a particular subject area. The tasks generally follow the contents of the draft description of the Detention Facility EIR. The task descriptions below spell out the purpose of the work task, procedures to be used in the task, expected product of the task and the type and amount of County staff involvement in the task, if any. The estimated time duration, and cost of each task is presented in Section 3. TASK 1. INVF?STORY OF EXISTING PARKING AND USAGE The purpose of this task is to identify available parking in the Civic Center area and adjacent neighborhoods where Civic Center purpose parking occurs and to develop estimates of the rate of utilization of that parking with respect to short- and long-term. A fairly complete inventory of off-street parking was contained in the previous project EIR. This will be checked and updated as required. Street parking will be inventoried by type (time limit, metered, etc.) and location. Definition of the limits of Civic Center parking will be based on discussions with County staff and field observation. Tentative limits would be east to Grandview Avenue, south to Henrietta Street, west to Ferry Street and north to the railroad tracks. Parking utilization will be measured two ways. The County Public Ulorks Department gathered data on parking accumulation in 1975 by direct count and indirectly via aerial photography. This existing data will be used by J11K to plot accumulation curves (parking utilization as percent of available supply by time of day) . Parking turnover will be measured in the field by' JHK. This is the most reliable method of estimating the demand for short-term parking, which frequently has a considerably different nature than long-term. A sample period of one hour will be used to provide a fairly sensitive analysis. 00202 -hk. 4 The products of this task will consist of an inventory of on- and off-street parking facilities in the Civic Center area, typical parking accumulation curves and a profile of parking demand by parking duration. This information will provide a base for discussing the current impact of parking on the area and provide relationships useful in forecasting parking demand. County staff involvement in this task will be limited to discussion of previous data gathering, survey techniques and results. No field or data reduction wort, by staff is anticipated. TASK 2. FORECAST OF PARKING NEEDS The purpose of this task is to forecast the future parking demand in the Civic Center area. Underlying this task is the develop- ment- of a "built out" description of the Civic Center complex. in Martinez, embodying measures such as employment, which can be used to extrapolate currently observed relationships. This built out case will be one of the central assumptions in any discussion of possible future parking and traffic situations. The County must take the lead in defining what the built out Civic Center will entail and what forecast period is assumed. Other factors, such as downtown redevelopment or the waterfront park also impact this question. JIIK proposes to work with the County in defining the built out case and identifying two (2) forecast periods to br-- analyzed. One will probably be 1980 when the new detention facility is opera- tional; the other in 1985 or 1990, depending on how reliably the build out forecast can be estimated. To define the base case, the forecast parking need will be developed primarily by extrapolation of present conditions. Fore- casts of employees and visitors will be used to define the possible increase in parking activity at the Civic Center. For the surrounding area, discussions %..ill be held with City of Martinez officials to develop reasonable estimates of future conditions based on the General Plan and its anticipated rate of achievement. 00203 jhk. 5 The product of the task will be a general parking demand forecast for two future periods. These will be measured against future (or present) supply to allow for analysis of potential deficiencies. The County staff is expected to take the major role in defining at least the magnitude of the Civic Center growth. The growth of the complex to date has lagged the estimates used in the 1963 and 1964 studies and reports to such an extent as to make them practically useless for short-term (ten year) forecasts. TASK 3. ANALYSIS OF PARKING ALTERNATIVES This task will address possible solutions to parking related problems identified in tasks 1 and 2, if any. Due to the limited reliability of the underlying assumptions regarding future parking demand, this analysis will center on the identification of reason- able alternatives and their relative feasibility. Certain readily definable effects, such as the loss of "x" number of off-street parking spaces due to construction of the Detention Facility, can generate more explicit discussion of alternative solutions. Alternatives generally fall into two-areas - increasing the parking supply or reducing the parking demand. Increasing supply may be accomplished by providing more spaces, at grade or in structures, in the Civic Center area; or by developing fringe parking lots on the unused industrial lands to the south and east of-the Martinez central area and shuttling persons (employees in particular) by bus to the downtown; or by obtaining greater utili- zation of short-term spaces through increased enforcement. Reducing parking demand can be accomplished through mode shifts to transit or car pools; or by implementing pricing controls to encourage or discourage different types of use. 00204 jhk._ ... 6 No single alternative is usually effective by itself_ Typically, various types of strategies are employed together with the overall effect aimed at enhancing other situations in addition to parking. Combinations of alternatives which may alleviate other problems associated with circulation or traffic intrusion will be examined as part of this task. The proposed emphasis on parking may seem excessive (three of seven tasks) , but it is supported by the outcome of the traffic impact analysis of the previous Detention Facility project. The greatest quantifiable impact of that project was the net loss of 100 parking spaces coupled with an increase in parking demand. Simi- larly, a frequent complaint voiced by the East Hillside residents concerned the intrusion of Civic Center employee and visitor parking into their neighborhood. It can be expected that parking will again be a major issue. County staff involvenent in this task is expected to be limited to discussion and review. JHK will perform all required field work and analysis. TASK 4. ANALIZF TRAFFIC FLOW AND VOLUME CHARACTERISTICS This task involves the major traffic analysis for base and forecast years. For each time period (1976, 1980, 1985 or 1990, as above) , traffic volume and flow characteristics will be assessed_ Those for the base year will be generated from direct observation; forecast year volumes vrill be based on extrapolation of observed volume trends, estimated levels of future activity in the Civic Center complex and possible effects of major new generators, such as downtown commercial expansion or a new park, near the Civic Center. Traffic volume data (peak hour and daily traffic) will be developed for the major streets within the immediate vicinity of the Civic Center; including Pine Street, Court Street, Marina Vista Escobar Street, !-lain Street, Uard Street and Green Street. Minor 00205 jhk. 7 streets such as Thompson, Mellus and Willo:., will also be considered, at least for peak hour volumes. Beyond the Center area the major . streets - Pacheco Boulevard and Alhambra Avenue, for example - will also be explicitly considered. Other streets may be considered as deemed appropriate based on initial analysis of those above. In addition to vehicular traffic, pedestrian volumes will also be observed. Much of the current peak congestion (5:00-5:15 P.M.) is due to the interaction of intense vehicular demand, heavy pedes- trian traffic and restricted geometries. Short peaks aside, current traffic condition is good and streets in the Civic Center vicinity are operating well below capacity. From the volume data and current observed congestion character- istics, estimates of future congestion potential, expressed as level of service, will be made. Volume estimates will also provide a basis for -calculation of vehicle miles of travel (V14T) for input to the air quality analysis. As proposed, County staff will be involved in the data gathering portion of this task. At the time of the 1974 study, the County Public 47orks Department performed some 24-hour machine traffic counts in the area as requested by JHK. Some of the counts were on streets for which no data was then available; others were located where historical data was available to analyze traffic growth trends which were then used to factor older volumes to estimated current year (1974) levels. Since that time the older counts have become more out of date, while there is do opportunity to-establish trend data at more locations. JHK proposes that the County again provide machine counts at approximately twenty locations (including directional counts) with the exact number and locations to be determined during the first week of the study. The counts should be complete by October 8. In addition to machine counts, the manual counts performed in December 1974 should be recounted and additional locations added. In addition to vehicle turning movement volumes, pedestrian OU206 jhk. 8 volumes and vehicle occupancy counts would also be obtained. The desired level of effort would require about 80 hours of observation.— At the County's option, this survey could be conducted by County personnel as an in-house service, or by temporary personnel hired and supervised by JIIK. The cost estimate shows either separately_ As a recommendation, JIIK would prefer the County perform the manual counts. Due to the hours involved (7:00-8:15 A.M. , 11:45 A.M-- 1:15 P.M-, 4:15-5:30 P.M.) , it is difficult to get effective man- pottier utilization. This is further aggravated by trying to arrange five hours pay over a ten and one-half hour period. Other approaches, such as hiring crews for each shift, triple the number of field personnel involved and add to the overhead and supervision costs. TASK 5. DETENTION FACILITY TRAFFIC GENERATION AND II•IPACTS This task deals directly with the Facility and associated activities at a small scale basis. Involved in this task are reassessment of the person trip generation factors developed in 1974, conversion to vehicular traffic estimates, analysis of site specific impacts such as displacement of existing parking and location of building access points, and a general analysis of the parking and circulation characteristics of the Detention Facility within the context of the Civic Center complex and adjacent activities. Based on the traffic generation and circulation effects discussed above, assessment of the impact of the project on the Civic Center area circulation and parking will be performed. This assessment will include vehicular volumes and level of service, pedestrian interference effects, vehicle miles of travel and adequacy of the parking supply_ Induced changes in circulation patterns and the potential access and neighborhood intrusion problems resulting •rill also be addressed. Other potential concerns apparent from the analysis or expressed by concerned persons will be considered as applicable- 00- 207 jhk....... 9 Most of the analysis performed in this task requires that the Facility be specifically sited. JHK understands that a precise site recommendation may not be forthcoming until October 15. As the draft Report must be submitted no later than November 1, JHK appreciates any effort to advance the date of site selection notification. County staff involvement in this task is expected to be limited to discussion and review only. TASK 6. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO MITIGATE IDENTIFIED IMPACTS This task is to identify possible and potential alternatives to reduce the impact of the Detention Facility on circulation and parking in the Civic Center and adjacent area. To the extent possible, this task and task 3 will be considered together to identify those alternatives which may be mutually beneficial or those which may counteract each other. As an example, staggering starting and departure times for different departments has great potential to alleviate the type of peak period congestion now experienced near the Civic Center area. On the other hand, staggered hours tend to work to the detriment of car pools and low frequency transit service which have potential to reduce parking demand. County staff input will be actively solicited during this task in the form of discussion sessions. The intent will be to identify the range of alternatives available. Once identified, JHFC will analyze them on the basis of relative effectiveness and ease of implementation. The output of this task will be a listing of alternatives considered, ranked or otherwise indicated with respect to JIIK's opinion of the efficacy of results. 00208 } PA. to TASK 7. PREPARE REPOP.TS JEiI: will analyze them on the basis of relative effectiveness and ease of implementation. The output of this task will be a listing of alternatives considered, ranked or otherwise indicated with respect to JIIK's opinion of the efficacy of results. 00208 jhk.�..... to TASK 7. PREPPILRE REPOP.TS This task basically sets off the draft report preparation, County review period and final report preparation from the general work stream. Certainly portions of the draft report will be prepared as the wort: in the individual tasks progresses. JHK is aware that time is of the essence to this portion of the project and will pursue the report preparation as expeditiously as possible_ JIIK will strive to deliver the draft report before October 29, but no later than the morning of November 1. Similarly, we will try to get the final report, incorporating County comments, delivered by November 5, but not later than the morning of November 8, pro- viding the comments are received by November 4. To expedite the review process and hopefully avoid any major revisions, JHK proposes to have a formal review meeting with appropriate County staff in mid-October, probably the week of October 18, to review progress, findings and recommendations to date. This meeting would be in addition to the short informal discussions held with individual staff members and referred to in the work tasks as discussion and review. All reports submitted by JIIK will meet County specifications with respect to format, order of content and reproducibility. JHK expects that all basemaps for graphics will be obtained from the County. 00209 11 3. ESTIMATED TDIE AND COST The estimated time schedule by task is shown on Exhibit I. This schedule conforms to the dates discussed at the meeting of August 17 between the County and JHK. The estimated cost by task is shown on Exhibit II. The total estimated cost, if the County performs the manual counts . in task 4 is $5,760. If the County chooses not to perform the counts, the estimated cost is $800 more, or $6,560. Also shown on Exhibit II are JHK & Associates standard labor rates for personnel who will be working on this study. In addi- tion to labor costs direct incidental expense, which on this project would probably consist of mileage, charged at $.15 per mile and outside blueprint service which is charged direct, would also be charged. An allowance for incidental cost is included in the estimate shown. 00210 ;,y N It N C) E: N > to O z � A in 34 4 C14 A o Q D D D D D 4 4.3 0 D A D A D 34 D p -2 o ' En � `4 Q Q D r' H 0 C-1 D D En 9 Q H H F x w E-4 x H � W H H O W to x w x w X w H U H to H U cl Ell z W H .amt 0 z U 9 14 En H to i-i z H H U W H z z " uHl >4 w H W to W H H H 4 E-4 H >:2 R: Uw a~' z w W to < < H Eo Hca r E-1 E-c a a a wU Uz Wz x w �zz o o >zz `sQ a a H C4 H to E-4 U O H w w H 00 to Hr to HE-i aE- w HT. •: tnz NW H< r > >4 f' >i - ;l a: H C7 Q ') Wa W aW .7Es w in t1, a. > a a acs 40 E-•z to E-4 ca d z. � O Z -r_ O taw OH x .-1 N 9 4 t.7 %0 t- x x x x x x x U) m to EA to EA to K a < < E+ E+ E-o F~ h E-4 H 00211 E X H I B I T I I ESTIMATED COST BY TASK TASK 1. INVENTORY OF EXISTING $ 980 PARKING AND USAGE TASK 2. FORECAST OF PARKING NEEDS 520 TASK 3. ANALYSIS OF PARKING 11000 ALTERNATIVES TASK 4. ANALYZE TRAFFIC FLOW AND 1,100 VOLUME CHARACTERISTICS TASK 5. DETENTION FACILITY TRAFFIC 460 - GENERATION AND IMPACTS TASK 6. POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES TO 900 MITIGATE IDENTIFIED DIPACTS TASK 7. PREPARE REPORTS 800 TOTAL $5,760 If .J11K performs manual counts in task 4, ADD 800 TOTAL $6,560 STANDARD LABOR RATES Robert W- Hubenette Vice President $65.00 Benjamin H. Goff Transportation Planner 32.50 Ray A. Moe Transportation Analyst 25.00 Clerical 12.50 00212 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 1976 In the Matter of Authorization for Chairman to submit proposal to Association of Bay Area Governments for additional Emergency Medical Services program funds. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, is AUTHORIZED to submit on behalf of the County Mr. Bob Eisenman's letter of August 4, 1976 to the Project Director, Emergency Medical Services, of the Association of Bay Area Governments as this County's official proposal for the use of additional unprogrammed funds which are available from the Association of Bay Area Governments' recent grant award for Emergency Medical Services. PASSED ON September 7, 1976. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor affixed this 7th day of September19 76 t J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Orig: Human Resources Agency Mar-,�Craii-� Bob Eisenman, VIC ABAG County Administrator County Auditor 00213 he Board of Supervisors Contra J=aPKp�y Chairman Cos}^ Jam"R.Olsson Coyln.y Administration Building !a County Clerk and P.O.Box 911 (-���� Ex Officio Cleek of Co ttr t3artinez.California 94553 Mrs.Geraldms Ruwa Chief Clerk James P.Kenny-Mc.1unond 1415)372-2371 1st District Alfred M.Diss-El SoSrante s H 2nd District n ~ Junes E.Moriarty-Latayette 3rd Dist.ict Warren 11.Boggess-Concord <th District Edmund A.Linscheid-Pittsburg 5th District September 7, 1976 Shari Staglin, Project Director Emergency Medical Services Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont Berkeley, California 94705 Dear Ms. Staglin: In accordance with fir. John McKoy's letter to me of August 20, inviting our County's Emergency Medical Services to submit their request for additional program funds which are available froia your recent grant award, please consider fir. Bob Eisernan's letter to you dated August 4, 1976 as our official proposal for the use of a portion of these funds.- A copy or today's Board Order authorizing me to take this action is attached for your records. The opportunity to submit our request in this instance is very much appreciated. ` Vary trulyrs, 0JX-1ES P. KENNY, CHAIR�'�t'� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JPx:clg Attachment HAicro,,!mad with board order. 00214 contra caeca county iealth_ Departme:ii Contra 1141.nanr—a1rcesAget2y Htalth-M-dicf-Social semcp --4.Wood.M.D. Costa Cfauds L Vanf brr:r %)1,h O1:irr '' !! Director te�CUrtLy Y -t ♦rr August 4, 1976 Contra Cosa County RECEIVED Shari Stalin, Project Director RECEIVED sP - n ►sro Emergency Medical Services Office of -. Association of Say Area Govermients County Adminisfrator Hotel Clare.ont SEtn ? 1976 Berkeley, California 94706 1. R. CLZa 1 CLERK BOARD or SUPERVISORS Bv. +A iRA A Oeou Dear Shari: As we all know, $87,639 of the ABAG/Regional EMS Council EIS Grant was disallowed by Heti for its original use of funding EMS dispatchers' salaries for Alameda ($37,639) and Contra Costa ($60,000) Counties. This rroney is presently uncar•a,%itted and A3AG is to sub..mit budget revisions, including new uses for these funds, to HE:1 shortly. On behalf of Contra Costa County and the county's E,'-',CC, I %-fish to sub-mi4 the following proposal for use of a portion of these funds by Contra Costa County: I. Transfer the $20,000 county match for the second UHF channel to grant funds, thereby freeing up county monies to be applied toward dispatchers' salaries. The original grant had the county matching with new hard expenditures of $20,000 for the UHF channel and $60,000 for dispatchers' salaries. Since grant funds for dispatchers' salaries were disallowed, ue wish to address the safre communications needs by applying grant funds to allowable items and freeing un- the county_corrnitMent for an item (dispatchers) unallo=wable in tea grant. II. $20,009 of add;Licnal CK.=, training egfiiprt1 nt (see attaclhed budGa,). Because of our %sork in ti:-_ County E S Office, a nwmber of public CPR courses could be instituted if additional equipment were available. These courses include CPQ training in the following settings: A- Industry and Unions 1. Contra Costa County OSHA Advisory Board is interested in helping set up courses in industry throughout Contra Costa County. Stan- dard Oil in Richmond is already involved in a CPP, training program for its supervisory personnel. 2. international Brotherhood of Electrical !forkers (iBEW) Local 302, Pleasant hill, wants to start CPR training for its members. Local 302 has 800 members. Pzease reply or eau: Administrative Offices Fiit-.burq Office Richmond Office pleavnt Hill office - oO�1� o.Flax.-.71 45 Civic A.- -,v 100 37th Street E5 Clrowland Road ' rtin.r h::en•n:n 90553 ptrh.n�.G,:irorni.,94565. . Mchmoml.C.ttdmnia 94S05 t'1-awnt I lilt,Cahfrxni.t r9-l5:3 - Shari Staglin = 2 - August. 4, 1976 3. Contra Costa County Civil Service Safety Office wants to train approximately 300 people as Safety Officers in offices through- out the county. B. Schools 1. Seven adult education facilities Milling to develop CPR courses when equipment is available. 2_ School nurse CPR training program presently being set up to train the 35 school nurses irr the county. 3. School office personnel program to train ttro people in each school site is presently being scheduled. 4. Plans to train high school teachers as CPR instructors for imple- mentation of ongoing CPR training of high school students. C_ General Public 1- Fire Districts - Danville and Rivervie:a Fire Districts desire to implement public CPR programs in their areas; other fire districts- have expressed similar interests. 2. Blood Pressure Screening Follow-Up - CPR for families of high risk parsons; Red Cross, Los fadanos College or fire departments will teach with available equipment. 3. Red Cross - Diablo Chapter currently training additional instruc- tors; Rich-mond Chapter wants to train more instructors but lacks equipment. Both chapters would greatly expand public progrars .if additional equipment was available. 4. Los Madanas Collet, : - willing to teach CPP, anywhere in the ccunty, but limited due to lack of e=u:p-ant. Los Idedanos College can provide mobile classes to teach 20 parsons at a tirra - continuous use during school 12 hou class - numb-ar of classes according to equipment available. III. Possible future request for limited medical disaster coordination. Due to the recent school bus accident in Martinez, a nu:iber of agencies have been reefing to discuss the county's capabilities for handling liited medical disaster (e.g. multiple accident injuries) situations. At this tine it is unclear :rhather- additional funds will be required to achieve the level of coordination ute desire, or whether existing agency resources will prove adequate. t{o:-rever, as soon as this deterni- nation is made, we would lire to be able to comre back. to ASAG and the Regional EMS Council to request additional funds if required_ 00215 r Shari Staglin - 3 - August 4, 1976 Please make copies of this letter available to the other EI-15 Council members and I ti-.,ill be prepared to discuss any of these iters in more-detail at our next Council Meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, Bob Eisenman, PhD_ Coordinator EI•IERGENCY-IIEDICAL SERVICES BE_cta Attachment cc_ Bob Hubenette, Chairman Regional EMS Council Allen Longshore, I•I.D. Contra Costa County Health Departnent Charles Phillips, I•I.D., Chairman Contra Costa County EI•ICC Orlyn Wood.- M.D., Health Officer Contra Costa County Health Department _ 00217 . August 4, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CPR EQUIPMEENT BUDGET I CPR Unit for Class of 20 1 Recording Annie $ 830.65 5 Resusci Annies (or Resusci Mannie) 1,406.50 ($281.30 each) 1 Resusci Baby 136.25 1 Film - "New Pulse of Life" 300.00 $2,673_40 per unit 7 Units = $18,713.80 Maintenance = 1,286.20 $20,000_00 BE:ca 8/4/76 - 00218 r•:= 'r cr% Ln cV M r— N M O (i1 N -r Cl CD ab f- r- r. N t±1 n r. q ' _ N N to Co r- co r4 M r) O L7 V :J O O Qt O N M t0 N N to rA J r` o+ O CC) v r. O C - O t0 N N M r+ 'r M N M O I j t0 l0 41 M L•) t0 M N q ca C O q O r, q ct q trn m cc F Co a1 a1 N o o M tr rn r O1 E+ N Ll q t0 t0 r\ M M O 1 tt to u1 t0 N r` Ql q -IT r� co M U1 —4 N N q Cl) N - M V! Z r- 01 � M 61 q M q In to rn to tt1 r— Co to m M u•) -4 U v' M O q lzT O r� I-: to q N r '^ < ^ M t0 N to to to t0 to .-. 1 M to ct t0 r► v O t0 v d `OL-O� w .-t N .r O 2 O Lz. .-� O Z O q t� to O M r- to 1 O r 1 U L U tt. N 'tt 4 l0 rte. M O t0 ct 1 O C O Gzi N .+ N rt O O :^ C CC C �ti tJ N r. to O t0 q O C M t0 co Ca N to O r— N N .+ .r .--4 co ls.l U t7 CT O q O M Clq .-) Clr-: to CJ == � N N M O Co fb %0 d •-9 'd' r••. N Ca N to O t0 r� r\ N Nr q U.. t0 cT .-t .-t N t0 N O r- to f O O W O C..1 f� M q h Ol N M t0 %0 40 h r` CT M O M F b C O t7- tD t0 N Cts . UM �' to t0 1+ O LC) <' t0 N .-� N M N M .w O O O O M fir- nr t� CC) � r, N M O 47 r CD rte. O M N M ' CO tt1 d 1 M N W tD _: 4 O N 1-4 Ln n Q1 M N n O N .+ N O , Vl ri N O L7 N to M N O co tT �r CA M q M 1 Q aQ r tD CT 1 b O r, O ) < O tP 1 t0 C1O L") tC) rl U O t: r+ N t0 ar N r+ C� to 4? N h O ri u i.7 47 7 N U G G _ A V U 'fl r3 i q O A3 =1 4) i C LL- 17 C V . u o b to o o n 00219 s�- REVISED EMS GRaiIT BUDGET COMT?,1 COSTA COUNTY Personnel Services Coordinator ('-- salary) $ 10,000 Assistant 15,675 Secretary 9,200 Associated Salary Costs (fringe benefits) 6,975 Consultants 3,000 Grant management 3,000 Subtotal $ 47,850 Operating Expenses Travel $ 2,500 Office Rental 1,500 Office Supplies 5,000 Office Equipment 2,000 Program Equipment 4,000 Data Processing 3,450 . Subtotal $ 18,450 Cormunications -UHF Channel Equipment $ 20,000 1.1onitor Receivers 13,000 Portable Radios 9,000 Subtotal $ 42,000 Public Education $ 10,000 Subtotal $ 10,000 Trainina Equipment $ 16,009 Subtotal $ 16,009 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1341309 COUNTY MATCH Coordinator $ 10,000 Associated Salary Costs 2,000 County Ambulance Contracts 200,000 Fire & Police - Emergency Response & Rescue 180,986 County EMS Cowunications 45,000 County Hospital & Clinics 118,000 TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $555,986 00220 ..u�.. .`, I s j'u REQUESTED *CODIFICATIONS IPI CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EjMS'GRAi1T BUDGET Personnel Services 1. Coordinator ('Z salary) $ 10,000 2. Assistant 15,675 3. Secretary 9,200 Subtotal - Salaries $ 34,875 4. Associated Salary Costs (fringe benefits) 6,975 Subtotal - Salaries & Fringe $ 41,850 5. Consultants 3,000 6. Grant Management 3,000 Subtotal - Personnel Services $ 47,850 Operating Expenses 7. Office Rental $ 11500 8. Programa Equipment 4,000 9. Data Processing 3,450 . Subtotal - !•codifications $ 56,800 EXPLANATIOU OF 1.100IFICATIONS Personnel Services 1. Coordinator Salary - separate base salary from fringe; no financial change. 2. Assistant - separate base salary from fringe; increase base salary from $14,000 per year to $15,675 per year'to conform with Civil Service classification. 3. Secretary - separate base salary from fringe; increase base salary from $8,400 to $9,200 to conform with Civil Service classification. 4. Associated Salary Costs - separate category; increase due to higher salaries for assistant and secretary. 5. Consultants - ne-x category; required to pay for consultant contract with Marilyn Ream ($1,250) and for anticipated short term consultant uses. 6. Grant Management - new category; county cost for administration of grant. Operating Expenses 7. Office Rental - decreased from $3,000 to $1,500 due to less- expensive office site. 8. Program Equipment - new category; separates office equipment and other equipment for ease in county purchasing of additional training, disaster, and administrative monitoring.equipment. 9. Data Processing - decreased from $5,COO to $3,450 to help offset increases. 00221 F In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing the Chairman to sign close-out reports for ACTION Grant No. 334-9036 and authorizing the Auditor's Office to issue a check to ACTION for $213.03 in unspent grant funds. The Board hereby AUTHORIZES the CIIAIR`,W4 to sign the close-out reports for ACTION Grant No. 334-9036 and AUTHORIZES the County Auditor-Controller's Office to issue a check in the amount of $213.03 to ACTIGN for unspent grant funds. APPROVED BY THE BOARD on Sertenber 7, 197F. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid V'rtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Dept.: OEO Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this ?th day of Sentember 19 7r Auditor-Controller 1112 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �i !�4�co r, Deputy Cleric Cra% 00222 MM Approved: 116-80243 Expires: June 30, 1978 FINAL CIJI-IJLATIVE COST AIM CASH RECEIVED REPORT Grant No. 334-90336 Project Period: From 5-16-75 Thru 4-15-76 Cumulative Project Award: $ 5,000.00 Cumulative Project Costs: $ 4,736.97 Balance to be Deobligated: $ 213.03 Cumulative Cash Received: $ S,000.00 Cumulative Cash Expended: $ 4,736.97 *Ballance to be Refunded: $ 213.03 I certify that expenditures reported are for appropriate purposes and in accordance with the agreements set forth in the application and award documents and that all unexpended funds have been returned to the U.S. Government. - '. J. P. Kenn Slaz4ature o offijcia thorized to Sign for Gr ee Chairman, Board o vperrisors *A check for this amount made payable to the "Treasurer of the United States" should accompany this report. ACTION Form A-270 (1/73) 00223i M aofilmed with board order Itti Reference: ACTION GRANT No. 334-9036 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN• This is to certify that no Federal Grant funds were used to purchase reportable non-expendable property under the referenced ACTION Grant. August 3, 1976 . Judy er, Executive Director Contra Costa County Office of Economic Opportunity. Community Action Agency 00224 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7, ' 1976 In the Matter of Fixing Time for Receipt of Bids for Workshop Transportation Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to develop appropriate competitive bidding materials (including Specifications, Notice, and Instructions) for release to the public at the earliest possible date (in compliance with procurement standards required by the State Department of Health) requesting bids for a contract to provide for the transportation of mentally retarded adults to the sheltered workshop facilities operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that September 21, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. is fixed as the time for the Board to receive bids for the aforesaid services. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregobv is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Su Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit pervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 7th day of September . 19 76 County Welfare Director Contra Costa County J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Association for the Mentally Retarded By Deputy Uerk Mai ne M. Neuf d RJP:dg H-24317615m 0(-� Rl uV i. Human R.cso'UziLes Agency Date September 1, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY RECEIVED TO Arthur G. ilI unty Administrator - "SEP a 1976 From C. L. Van ?Tarter, Director � .I! J. a ocssori CLEW WAS o:suravl50RS .3 f 8v A CO. +S,ubj COMPETITIVE BIDDING FOR THE SOCIAL SERVICED i :.nu � ti �' SPORTATIOY CONTRACT Attached for presentation to the Board of Supervisors is a proposed Board Order which authorizes me to develop and release to the public appropriate competitive bid specifications and materials for the Social- Service Department contract which provides transportation services for mentallyretarded adults to the sheltered workshops operated under contract by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded. State Department of Health procuremaat standards, governing the purchase of services under Title XX of the Social Security Act, require that service providers be selected through a competitive bidding process. The contract (#20-075) with the current provider, Wofford Bus Company (dba Patchett's Bus & Transportation Co.), expires on September 30, 1976, and the provider of service for the next twelve-month period, October 1, 1976 through September 30, 1977, (under a new contract not to .exceed $103,320), must now be selected by competitive bidding. The funding for this Contract is in the Department's approved budget and no appropriation adjustment is required. In order for the Board to approve a contract with the selected bidder prior to the start date on Friday, October 1, the Board must select the bidder and a-aard the contract on or before their meeting on Tuesday, September 23. Allowing one week to review and evaluate the bids which are submitted, bids must be received no later than the Board's meeting on Tuesday, September 21. And in order to allow prospective bidders at least two weeks in which to prepare their bids, the competitive bidding materials must be released to the public by September 7. I regret that there is not sufficient time tb present the actual bid specification documents to the Board for approval prior to release to the public as the documents are still in the process of being prepared. However, the bidding documents will essentially be the same as the ones developed and used for the bid last March. I therefore recommend that the Board approve the proposed Board Order author— izin.a me to develop and release to the public appropriate bidding materials and fixing September 21, 1976 as the date for all bid proposals to be received by the Board, and request that you present my recommendation to the Board with your endorsement for approval at their nest meeting on Tuesday, September 7, 1976. CLVM/R.JP:dcg Copies: Geraldine Russellf Don Cruze Attachment W. A. Schmidt Ida Lodrow R. E. Jornlin Le_ Hunter LL11 Q(,��� Bob Hofmann [3 hlicrofiimed with board order Contra Costa County Social Service Department Human Resources Agency Bid No. 20-100 NOTICE TO BUS SERVICE CONTRACTORS: Invitation For Bids NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THAT THE CLERK OF SAID BOARD WILL RECEIVE BIDS UNTIL 11 O'CLOCK A.M. ON TUESDAY, SEPTE`lBER 21, 1976, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR, WORK, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES for Transportation of Mentally Retarded Adults to Sheltered Workshops Operated By The Contra Costa County Association For The Mentally Retarded INSTRUCTIONS FOR BIDDERS: 1. Review the attached BID FORM, BID SPECIFICATIONS, and STANDARD CONTRACT. 2. Prepare a Bidder's Statement of Qualifications in accordance with Paragraph D. of the BID SPECIFICATIONS. 3. Complete the attached BID FORM; attach your Statement of Qualifications, Financial Statement, and Letters of Recommendation; and seal in the attached BID ENVELOPE. 4. Submit your sealed BID ENVELOPE to: THE CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ROOF! 103, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA, on or before TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 1976, until 11:00 A.M. Bids received after this time will be rejected and returned unopened. Properly received BIDS will be opened in public at 11:00 A.M. in the chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Room 107, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, on Tuesday, September 21, 1976, and there read and recorded, prior to referral to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review and recommendation regarding award of the contract to the most responsive Bidder. The contract award will be announced by the Board of Supervisors in public at the time due in their chambers on Tuesday, September 28, 1976, or as otherwise may be set by the Board. For any questions, contact: Human Resources Agency Contracts and Grants Unit Phone (415) 372-2622 J. R. OLSSON COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD Microfilmed with board order 00227 DATED: 9/7/76 By Maxine M. Neufeld DEPUTY CLERK ! 1 t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Public Works Employment Act of 1976. The Board having received a September 7, 1976 memorandum report from Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, on the status of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976; and Mr. Heinz FenichelP Assistant Director of Planning, having appeared and described the Act to the Board; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid report is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director of Planning Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 7th day of September—, 19 gy � J. R. OLSSON, Clark i Deputy Clerk Ma rai H-24;nb 15m 00* 228 ti - RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY $LP 7 1976 PLANNING DEPARTMENT / CLERK BOARD OF SJ?iRVWIZS TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: September 7, 1 G FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesusat SUBJECT: Public {Corks Employment Director of Planning Act of 1976 By: llein_ Fenichet, Assistant Director On September 2, 1976 the County Administrator established a Task Force to Facilitate imlilementation of this Act as it relates to Contra Costa County, and requested a brief report to the Board on the Act. The following is a capsule description of the Act; additional detail is pro- vided in the attachments. A. Status of the Act Consress recently passed the Public !Corks Employment Act of 1976, intended to reduce unemployment in the United States. An appropria- tion bili of $3.95 billion was passed by the House, has been reported out by the Senate Appropriations Committee, and is currently under consideration by the Senate. Approval is anticipated in the imme- diate fixture, but there is some talk of a Presidential veto or possibly impoundment of the funds. B. Title III The Act contains three Titles: Title III provides additional funds for water pollution facilities to certain States -- however, California is not among them. C. Title 11 Title I1 will provide counter-cyclical funds to recipients of General Revenue Sharing who have unemployment in excess of 4.5$. Funds will be provided up to an "entitlement" based on a formula, will be supplied at differing; levels by quarter of the fiscal year, and can be used mainly to "maiutaiu basic services". Congressman Miller has estimated the County's entitlement to be approximately $1.6 million. This Title is atirainistered by the Departrent of the Treasury, which will issue regulations and guidelines only after the appropriation bill is passed and the federal office of Management and lsudget has provided funds. It may tale several weeks to reach this point, and since the regulations and requirer.ents to obtain and use money arc as yet unknown, the County's activities on this Title will be limited to obtaining current inforaation and general preparatory work. n Ncrofiknad with board order 00229 Board of Supervisors -2- September 7, 1976 D. Title 1 Title I is of urgent concern to the County at this time. This Title provides 100: federal grants for public works construction projects on a competetive application basis. It is administered by the Economic Development Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, in our case through the Regional Office in Seattle. Regulations for applica- tions and use of fiords were published oil August 23, 1976 and, though Oversight hearings are in progress, it is expected that the regulations will remain largely as they exist now. 1. Application Processing. Applications for funding will be received when both the appropriations hill is passed and an application form is completed. The latter is still being negotiated with 016. Both events. could occur next week, or not for several weeks. Once applications are received, they will be reviewed by EDA for com- pleteness and correctness; any application found deficient will be shipped back to the applicant without prejudice, and several cycles of rejections may occur. CDA may be expected to use this rejection device as a means of stretching out the workload Since by Iaw, any application not rejected within 60 days of receipt is automatically approved. Approved application data will he rated (see rating system below), will he fed into a comiluter in Washington, D X. for comparison with other applications, and a first cut for approvals will be made by computer at between 30 days and 60 days from starting date of the program. If this first cut does not use up all funds, a second computer cut may be made later, with subsequent computer runs until all funds are exhausted. There uas some concern that all funds might be used up in the first cut, and that certain large communities with high unemployment might "sop up" most availa- ble funds due to computer rating. 2. Funding. Authorization and estimated appropriation are both at $2.0 billion and, based on a 12.5% limitation by State, California is expected to receive $250 million. 3. Eligible Applicants. States, Counties, Cities, Special Districts (includ- ing School Districts), and regional authorities. d. Eligible Areas. Areas which have unemployment in excess of 6.n in the 12 months preceding; the application. Areas in the County may use County data or may choose to select data for smaller areas if they can provide unemploy- ment data certified by the State. 5. Grants. The 'Title provides for 100: or supplemental grants; however, certain restrictive rules make 1U0: grants the more readily available. 00230 Board of Supervisors -3- September 7, 1976 6. Eligible Projects. Construction (including demolition and other site preparation), renovation, repair, and other improvements related to public works projects that have a "local orientation". Public works projects authorized by other Federal Acts are also eligible. 7. Ineligible Projects. ° Projects that would alter the natural state (i.e. undisturbed by man) of a water course. Eligible projects in this area would include dredg- ing a previously diverted river, desilting an existing dam, temporarily diverting a river for bridge construction, or jetty work in.the case of beach erosion or storm damage. • Projects for which construction cannot be started within 90 days of project approval. (The definition of on-site labor will be inter- preted liberally for cold weather areas.) in EDA's view, the follow-_ ing conditions would probably indicate an inability to meet the 90-day requirement: the lack of clear title to the project site; the involve- ment of condemnation or relocation action; an insufficiency of informa- tion contained in assurances for plans and specifications; or thi= pres- ence of controversy over the environmental impact of a project. • Projects on which construction is ongoing (i.e., a construction contract awarded, a notice to proceed issued, or on-site labor begun). • Projects requiring financial assistance over $S million (subject to occasional waiver). • Projects that will take over two years to complete (subject to occasional waiver). • Projects for which funds are already budgeted and/or committed by a state, local government or other federal agency. ° Projects that would cause adverse environmental impacts. • Projects that would generate labor requirements in excess of those available among the unemployed of the project area. S. !'roject Rankin)-. EUA has designed a project selection system that assigns a basic rank to each project based on the following four factors: a. up to 3oa based on the number of unemployed workers in the project area. b. Up to 2S=e based on the unemployment rate in the project area. c. lip to 301: based on the cost per person-month of employment (i.e., the ratio of total project costs to the total number of person- months of employment generated). 00231 Board of supervisors -i- September 7, 1976 d. Up to 15: based on the level of income in the project area. This basic rank: will be increased if one or more of the following - criteria are met: c. Up to IOa if the project has potential for providing long-term benefits, such as a needed community facility. f. 5% if the project is sponsored by a general purpose local government. g. 5". if the project relates to existing approved plans of a local community development or regional development nature or advances longer range plans and programs. 9. Application Assurances and Requirements. Following are the major t•ssurances which must be made and requirements which must be met in order to 1;et a public works grant. ° That on-site labor can begin within 90 days of project approval. Simultaneous design and construction (i.e., "Fast-tracking") will be aIloteed if necessary to meet this requirement. ° That plans, specifications and estimates are complete enough to ensure meeting the 90-day requirement. (EDA will not review or approve final plans and specifications except in "unusual circumstances"). ° That no person has been discriminated against or will be denied the benefit of the project on the grounds of sex, national origin, color, or race. ° That the application has been submitted to the appropriate A-95 clearing- house. Applicants are urged to do this as soon as possible; EDA will only require this upon application. Clearinghouse comments will go directly to EDA, where an application will not be approved for 30 days to give time for the clearinghouse to submit comments. however, 90 days after EDA first begins to receive applications, the regular, less-stream- lined A-95 procedures will go back into effect. ° As applicable, projects Should advance lung-range plans and relate to existing local and regional development plans, such as UEDP's, Comprehensive plans, HUD 701 plans, and EPA Arcatiride 208 plans. ° The following environmental information is required: (1) project elements that will impact the environment; (2) nature of the environment to be impacted; (3) data on the expected impact; (4) alternatives to the proposed project; (5) any environmental analyses previously done by local, state, or federal agencies; and (6) public reaction (if available) as evidenced, for example, in public hearing: transcripts. (See elsewhere in this packet for a fuller discussion of environmental requirements.) 00232 Roard of Supervisors -5- September 7, 1976 ° '171e guidelines and regulations contain a listing, of other standard federal requirements, such as specific civil rights laws, relocation procedures, the Davis-Bacon Act and others. 10. Project Costs. Eligible: ° Construction and facility improvement ° Relocation expenses ° Capital equipment not included in the construction contract' ° Completion and updating plans, specifications and estimates where architectural design/preliminary engineering has already started and needs more work to permit construction ° Other A/G costs such as inspection fees and test borings ° Legal and audit costs Ineligible: ° Acquirim, real property (land, rights-of-way, etc.) ° main-tenance costs--to keep a facility in efficient operating condition ° Costs for plans, specifications, and estimates incurred prior to application ° Cost overruns (no additional funding once a project is approved) ° Design Grants only li. Gvaluatiou and Recommendation. Ilic Act presents the County with an opportunity to assist its unemployed residents in finding; jobs in the labor market, while at the same time constructing public works needed but not funded due to budgetary constraints. However, even within the limitations imposed by the Act, there will be keen competition between California units of government for the available funds, and projects submitted for the first cut will have a much better chance of approval than those submitted later. Further, under the processing; rules of I:DA, only applications submitted at the very beginning of the program can be revised and resubmitted -- if necessary -- in time to make the first fund- ing selection. It follows that the County should act as expeditiously as possible to proixire project applications for the best candidate-projects, and should establish an approval mechanism to deal with speedy application revisions and supplements required by GDA. Since any proiect in a successful application will be constructed wholly with Fedrral funds, with only the costs of preparing the application bornr by the Cmataty, it is recommended that the Board authorize its Chairman and/or the County Adamini::tator to sign the application and related docum,--ats. This would permit ninor changes and corrections in the :application to he wade in a matter of a dray or tato, rather than eight day: or score if Board action were realuired in each instance. A draft resolution .is attached for your consideration. IIF:dI% Attachment 00233 IN 711E WARD OF SUPIiRVISURS of. CO1i112A corm COU1STY, ,rxrE- OF CALIFORNIA In the Akitter of Applications ) Pursuant to the Public Works ) RESOLUTION NUMBER Employment Act of 1976 ) Title I of the Public 14orks Iimployment Act of 1976 provides, among other things, for 100: federal funding of certain eligible public uorls projects by counties, if successful application for funding is made; and Contra Costa County is :in eligible Applicant and area purslrint to said Act, by reason of substantial unemployment, and a need to construct public works projects in excess of available local funds; NOW, 111EREFORli, III: IT RESOLVIiD that County staff is instructed to prepare applications for construction grants for eligible public works projects pursinnt to the Public 14orks Employment Act of 1976, and to file said applications for grants with the Economic Development Administration of the U. S. Department of Commerce for funding; 111: IT FUR111ER R1.SOIYIiD that the Chairman of the Board and/or Cunnty Administrator be authorized to sign said applications and related documents. PASSED and ADOPTED this 00234 MONDAY, AUGUST 237 1976 vNES f f� „.KfiH. PART V: . - ' ��ri;�4w•:e •� - ' ��1UG. 2 fi FSU , i tib. 13” t DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration �- LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS . CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT - I � -• � ��:%�•.��:F=ice._ - .. AND -INVESTMENT ti- 1 -t:. PROGRAM ' a . , :•�, . final Rulemalcin 00235 :lifiill RULES AND RECISLATiONS iitlr.)1—hus6•escCreditmutAzsietance It. tylthinthazertdl"so.1-1Inner proj- ("nre•Idrrpfirin has. been Vlren Ps to CIIAPitR 1'I—LCOttOt11G ULVEI.UrblEflr cc L: that rntxinsire tns,ssrrlOO! rrnl,lny- wheiarrmatters.scLforth Its Uit-.ercr:ai- Ant-titusinATtpu, DEPARmEtir OF anent r+t,pnitunitIm and- :herever Sac- L.therm reinstitute a major fireiprcal%11.11 COMMERCE sible.111:11,tmvinai:r e1111.1 rnncnL Ppltnr-• an inflationary bnl+aat wlUsln the tnt nt- PART 316—LOCAL PUBLIC YtpRItS ClTt- Lunities for unemployed rc.idents of Use Isco of OL111 Circular A-107 atad Interface- PART U6—LOCALP AND 1 WORKS CAM protect ars..••&: Entire rutdelimn as L-.sued by the I]clrrrL- PROGRAM c.To fusser locally oriented projeet-r Starlit or Contntcrce.A determination(sat that Provide aeefut public facilities In beets maple that these rcrlltatlatt:CIO lint The rconontle I)evelvpmett A-Insint:- ateas t.f high unemployment and lour extend or ro beyond Use statute, And tralion,pumitant to Title 1 oh Ute Pull- Income: therefore,thrre Is no inflationary lmtmet & lie works Krnploynsrnt Act of 1976. if.To fond projrety that Advance local of Laine rerulntions beyond Line,at•&Lul hercl)y ImblWies lit" rerulatlans to'plmu: anti contribute to long-term de- Accordingly,Lite regldations shall rend mnend Title 13 of Lite Cede of I'etienl velopsneut: as follows: lttgulatious by nddbig n new Part 316. e.To tarsal fnrliftles that could not.See. 11tese regulations t1mcribe phecalures pare Stern enntlructed in the Mr.ence Of 215.1 •tvrpo-•r. by v0sleh elirible atpplirauls relay rtcelve the Inca! Public wart. rout (I.e.. fa- 3162 Deanttlenz: llmmicsnl asdctZuce for the construction cliltles for which rerleral funds are Pant 3143 Applleants. (Includim: denhulltlon and other site merely irplocitir or mluclom Intal,State 316.1 1)Irrrt manta. lsrcl+tt:U"n nctivilless, rentrratIvit. Cc- or other Fcderni monies that have been 396.6 rr.tpldenierleal rMestal. pair,or other hnproveKnent of local Ins- stv'eirtnlly provided Par act as191c): after 3147 t.beerity of ro Cetis. .Ile wtirks projects and for Use comple- f. Tb carry out a e4rnprehenave eval- atss An 10.7 numon orroi�v than of plans, speeifleatlons, and rati- unWit or bolt. the•direct. employment p ograaarer°oreefeveH ' 4►rrgkmnl olace•rt. mates for local public works projects.. Itthltart and the Indirect or stimulative -3tas Detrrrtilnotion of, unemployment S:Art Wart or Ondpxrnrs' anion of Use projects funded. rates. itr•enit%e tit m. rMulatloos 1+^rialn to a 31(Lt6 Ceram.I es+nslderattnnee wait regntre- I.IMMavtvE Osrecnvrs rant lit orram admtnl-.erred by the F.rn- menta for anstndal aseaLwa sre. ntua&te Llevelopft.ent Adrnlnrstratlon.the 316.11 Cennl.ttrtraee with other Federal re- Ort lire bn.ic of Can In-depth ttiidy of rele.:tut provision. of tier Ailtnitihtra- getireinesitat the Lru:al Public works Cspltat Develop- ata 12 Acerptaneo of afaldle ttlearter. mtsht rsn.l investment Act of 1976 asset its tive Procedure Act (S U.S.C. 553) re- .314.17 f:nvirmnnentnl corudderations. 1rrl%laUve history. 1t has 11cen eleler- quiriug notice of pmlwsrd r1drainklur, 316.11 Metal detennlaatlon. mlard Vaal.the purpose of Uhislegislation e+frrtortindly lar public llartri7ntion and 316.16 Termlreaneaa. 1s to f+tetvitlet delay lit elfeeUre state are Inapplicable. Amir•.sirr: True r, Pub.k 111-3119 (deter A. lanpb+yment opl+ortunttics in areas In addition. SMUurn 107 Pat the 1'itbtie n,19761:12 VA.C.slot el scq.:no Seat.91W. of high unrmploymrnt Wrourir Use ex- 1yorks nrepiovmerd Art of 1976 rerinlres u"1 Drparttnent of Corianerce OrgaMantlon lttlttlotts construction or renat:atlon of lini•tr•aucutbir m,;uiataer+s to be pre- Order to-%(0.ptember30.3075).amameaded useful public fnetlitics•and ' rrribtd within thirty days-After date of Ho I71;66702,a:arrnended at 40 Flt 601176). b. A countercyclical btisnolus to the era^intent. §3if.,I I•urpeet. national rconotny. I Iv%r#•cr,in nrrnrd;a&cr with lar,splrit The pur(v,rc or the.part L.to se:.forth ' of lisp public policy ret forte ba 5 UZ.C. the rcquir•snrtiN and procafurra pear- f; s Ptleraas oattcn:rs ..s3,iuterc%let!taersasua may sulnilt vrr1L-. Aumis rs of len:L prsbl:o ankh 1-to- ern co::nunds or surrrlieans to the As- suant to which ellrible applicnntr, may graarr.• and the Economic D:velopntetst ristant titcrcl-.try for Urrinvanir Urveinp• �ie W grants F usuicr Title I 4h the 977. Atirnlntsitstinn's 9FF3.00 experience !rt mcnt. U.S, lkpartmvrtt of Consairrce, tic Nark:.entitled thoysuctite Act of 1976, operating such prorrarus have te.calcd Ronan 7^0011,WAMAIngtrn,D.C.-102311 by whGA k:rnUtletl alta"Local Pulrlle Y.'ark. certain characteristics about USe tile extant •plenber 21, 1976.This L.st nen and Act of t of 1.97131:1Lie•vdopmtnt attd Investment ' anal Pasture of employment prumaled Say wiele-(orad prograul,relief all su::rc,tons; Ac publle r.otl:s construction.Or these,Ilse: receive-(will be carefully Cronsidercd.It §316.2 Deriolrinn+. mo:.L relevant to tine objecllvcs of lite a suflicient. number of valid continents -Assittant Secretary" niea ns; ala Ax- Local Public Works Capital Derelolt- saishnr. Mr.ni:icaat Lsuta are. received, st:tant Sectetiry of Comenerce for Eco- talent Anti Itnrstftrestt Act.are Lite pre- else-.p. res;ul illnnt tiny,be amended arid nnmlc Development or his delegate. por.de•nnee of skit:rel couslnsetion jots republidird. Until such tree as further "Indian fiibe- macule. tile governitag and tine relatively Itigla eo.:L of cresting clnans:rs are trade however.13 Ci•'IL Fart hotly or a tithe. nonprofit Iridian calf- It job throurh each an np:neeach. Ile- 316 shall remain ht eflert, thus per- puratioti (restricted to Iudlortsi,Dtdlan twrcn feat and al percent of the aura of udttintd Use public busluess to proceed authority or other trV1:d orgsinizaLlan or a public trearks project are for tuale- rllurerxpeditiously. entity or Alaskan native villoge rials eelitilunrnt, overhe:ul, and cosi- The application form, neersrary to "Initiation of construction" atean3 tractor rinants, ieavrrtr beturen 19 Aud carry out lite Public:TCarks Employment that a contract ties been awarder! fur 33 lirrccut for arc-site wares. Cern- Act of 1976.A..provided In Section 107 con%lnlction of Lite project or notice to sequently, even Use mast tabor hilen- therein, has been prescribed laid sub- proceed or It-. equivalent lies been 11- athe Inti-lie works projects renernte a still tai to the 0111ce of atsnnrrsttent and sued or ort-site labor has begun.which- limited ainonnt or direct cenployinent per Ruslret for clearance Ps rcetufred by=ever la curtrr. dollar of praivet cast,Public worts proj-• 0t,111 Circulus No. A-40, as revised on "Local Public Warks Act"means Ute rr4tin, however. result fat cupful esu( I'ehruary 10, 1976.Warn clearance has "Ileal Public Work. Capital Ih:vcln;i- limletrL.Paul are conunotily hNlevevl to 1wrn irceived.r.DA will publi-h Vie rep- .Pant and Iftvelhnrrtt Aet of 1976," . lemtlde �rocrnl ernnundc sthmdallnn. phcatie•n town,v.lslrh still then lir.avail- Witter,L:'J'Ule I tat Use Pubiic WorkxEnt- 1•arttculnalrlotileenastruetlenartdcon- able lhrou(:1. EUA and fix Ite(tlonat ployincntAct.of1970. structhm-related Industries. Qpirce "heeler government" menus any city, lit rerornftlnn of these chxracleri-lir; futric-.14.1 petrnn.sts.audd I:ekr notice re,taaty. town, parlllr,or other politicnt : of trnhllr r.•nts;can Arlicll.-e1(uoi.rl ..+.: tbret It is the policy or Isar F:•"nontir.Ise_ staxiio has or a Slate einrinding I-ecal cell are other enri:•tdrtatinnc derlrilar rclopni-•ut Adrlihalarnton Sisal. no Pp- school 411%lila.),will any rniiklel faille. from III•: Ice.*Klnthn Paid I:LtA's cipe•rl- pdicntiote. fear financial n:Laanrr pur- "71rintenanee ea+ls"meats.aisle that valet.. liar fono%ittr ebjrctivct for its- sv•tnt to Title I of tlae PuLlle l:•ar fill- ate Incurred for any nra:eSsvy rclnir. plenicnatn,-, the Lreal Public Works Act 1weinert Act of 1974 rill be nceelited, orupker•pefproperty which neltheraeltl3 have tweet cstablW1rd: unlll the hands to Irnis:etnent the pro- to the 1-crmnnent value of tete property A,Ta insane that consideration is.lumen hare actually been approt-rLded' or appreciably prolong.:!fs intended life, glvvst to the relnlive nretls;of We various Dead nplttirtioned to and sande avallable but rather keeps It In an efficient over- reotioru or the country;' for u:.c by Use agency. ailuit condition. FEDERAL REG1SIM VOL 41. 110. 164...-MOIIOAY.AUGUST 23. 1976 0023-s ' RULES AND REGULATiONS .triiiii , "11.0theaf subdirisios tat a Shrlr" flit 'Ilse Awl%tant SerrctarY afro Sony uurult+loyurent rate for the thrs•e slorr-t tor:tm fire at turi(:.e. huteutrhrtntalilits itrakc crams in all amount t:rrrr..Iry to revent rolvictulive ruaAlhs for v.Ilfi in- :--III ml 1.1,it +•':+bti:br.2 or auttror- provide all for tart of the rtquirt-d State furotatbat is avallabic/:Inure tllau a!a I.-$d by!*.late lair including.but tint Intl- or local Asara' 11rd#tut butts Metst.J of perrrrit [Pitt not more than Ilse. avers„e It.,,I 1.r,st+ccixl distrirts and rr•yional au- the cs•t of any 11111sli-c woks ptojert for Rational insmnihioynunitrule for the;utrnn. thtr:ilim Imated Vy local ra-mo tn•uts, which financial ammiahsre Lc authortmil !u•rindoftiine and •'11111-tic furls”tor--tis.:pubbe facilities toy SLite or local tate tequirius::urs can- tilt Projrrt DltPlic*tiots:.ul+rutttet Iy forituloki.but nut lsttitcd to.luuniril.at lribution it the*ppficatd subutit: wits State or bleat governments whose avcra;:e - oltirrs, tomthousrs, libraries, sclswht•. Its applications A urittrtt'certification litunnployntent rate for tine three tiaras 1+02ce and rate Stations.detention!:reit- front file anin'opri:ate authority that: rerent camccutive mouth.:for whlr.I in- t itis t. water and scir r lines.Atrt4-t! ar:d 11) 'tire share of financial=.l tauce Gnmation is Available Is CIS peteent fir t44•td:I i icludiul:curl.I0.sblewalks.tight- rust applied for has been property ap- lc.:::. 'Iltme project;opl.11c:itiolr. will its lo:- irrrrattotial laviiilles. cunventiwt proved:snit Is hnutediately available for rntlsiderrii only when funding of t:nrl& cadets, civic centers, tametmts. Drift tire project: prolects is necr_:tary to fuifiil the mini- - sraith. education and social Sf.-rvke ter 7'!m project meets All applicable intim fundinr, level reltislred for matt-ft larditi-:x statutory mal otter relevant require- State or It funds are available In Use 30 "stale-IncludesthrserctaiStatcs+tile hictib;of law:and licrrentcutclunry. IHNIrtrt ill Columbia,lite Con+nsntae.dtlt r3)Ctntstrlutlon ut the project los flat (b) State.thuitations: Not less 111311 of Currio RICO.the Virgin Iairuils,Guaut yet IML-11 initiated, one-trail of one percent or more Unn it, American Satnoa. (e)Grants under tats section may eft- twelve and one-halt percent or sett elude funtLi for the completion of plans, ftmrnunt.appropriated to carry asst pilo §3lfr 3 ApplGcault. specification,and esthaates where*deli- Local public WorivIi Act shall he rraitted A State or alocal government,its de- tional Architectural and engluccring for else!ovale blic works t t not less Utah rater '• fined in 1310.2 of tris part. Is eligible work or gelated platnudus:is regnttcd to for asi;tance under Lite Local Public permit construction of the project under fruit or one percent at lite total of all Works Act Isis sectloct. funds appropriated for List,part shall!re 3IG:t tlirrctFranta. Slier. lilsai&atiaatenFnnt+. RrAnted for public wortss projects'In S Gumn,lite Virgin Islamism.and Anterieutt (a) Tile Assistant Secretary may t,)Canals and watercourses.Ito grant Samoa.in tae argregale. make direct grants to any State or local $11311 pro trade under this part for airy $3!6.11 AIt.Matiun at prat,-,ran#resource rarci ntuent for construction (Including project having as its principal purpose Its rill to reelanal otracra" denutdition and other site preparation and peraanent effect: ortivitiesi. reuovallon, relmir,or other t 11*rise channelizttiot,dasnminl,dl- (a) Regional allocations.To assist in Improvement of lord public imtks moj-. verso n. or dredging of any natural lite orderly utilization or program re- mis. lnviudinc tune for uIticlt FIrderal twatrrcoume or sources, Use Arsistant Sesrettry viii fiuaucUl amictauee is authoWsra under (:) 'Ilse construction or enlargement assirst to each rerisnaI office u target provisions of law oiler that& the Local of any canal except a canal or raceway level of anticipated project asitstaure for 1tit11lic Ylorks Act Stich grants nifty in- desicnat#d for maintenance as an his- the hrtif of Dir nreas served by li•,at re- ctude funds for Rite completion of p1mr.'. toric site. Floud olltee.Such rerlosal nitucatom of ".l>-ChI atittns and rstimsatr-s v.I`lc addi- lb) Real properiv. No tort of any pritl:r:tm resoureca shall ho hmsed oat ap- ta-nal arrhittctural and at-nhicerfor, grant inane totter this part shall he sued pl'ultriatiult opportintnnents available to u-til k fir selated ptinnirr is t etpaircd to for the r.quisitkin of any liderent ill n aI EDA and shall be calculated an A inrutuhc perritit roti Uuctiun of Use psuject,under property. Lasix rettectinc the relative munhen: it fill.m*-00,1. yet Maintenance.fro start of ally era/lit unemployed persons fit the Slater served flit At pliratIons under this srYUrn snide under this part slsall lie u%ed fur by lite tri:lonal office and the level of un- vall 1W --pmovw only If the al.plimlit lice 11a)ntart of n13iutru:+sscv rents la employment rates int tura Stats-::. tuihniil%with its application,if airptira- cotailrction Witt A project con:tnteted flop Stale planning ceilings. IIrgionrd bit-. a smitten eeriitiratir,n from tine rlit whole orIli p3rt*o Willi Fedcr l fuau:- orkes shall i issurve with rmpert In earls c0 r Feticnal aCelwyAmencits that lite vial a=%istance under tine Local Public St:rte served by It a ceiling wit project paoject norms all Dpplimble IN-dertl stat- 4dorks Act, approval recomfnentatiois.The niloea- ulory and reetsiatory rettuiretnruts. acstion of floods to regions and States will (c) 'lite federal share of any project 3if,.7 Prinrs.oft.rat i .. be made after the fusels have been all- for t:Itirl a resat ix matte under lids rat Alliwationo/fusels.sl)Intuaking twrtbnsed to EDA and will lie based on ..ertiont Mt;tll be 100 per scutum of Lire grafts umdrr this prat.when the average onempi-miens data available 3t that sacs of lice project. motional unessihtloyrtratnt tate for the three. F-UA will announce the date ass fitter ntat-t r:rent consecutive ltwntAa whicls the funds are apportioned and the 4 316.:. tinpptemrnmt leant. fur wI1L^!r data is Available front the allocation L.made.The fortnuht by which W)Thr A.r lstant Secretary forty snake flhuhtrd St:tri rjeparhnent or Labor,lax tine pinsning Belling for eneII State will supliletnental gsmits for Ilse tnut-o-z of been atImmi,G;=p.;reetst: be established Is as follows: Itrmn,.ou: the Federal cuntributiou to it) Seventy per'rentOfall amountsall- Snhjeet to program ad#Mattranra costs 10 pett.rut tot tire project ctmt for any ptot+riatid to carry out lite Local!'ublie and statutory'nuuunum and osaxtmuhn 1'rdrr:-tiY.oc;iattd p•ublie, works project lvotkc Act shalt le allomtcct for project Ainoutas allocated to Individual Glares by autheirired by atry Frderal law other than Dpplica*xim;sulxnittcd by State or local the trgi..tallon.GS percent of the funis Dist ,. tae Lm al Ilii clic Winks Act it flu amili- ruveriunrola- wase avenge tmemplay- uolr:istia a�s uxnrd ahsstne stmsre ni us`Kirtnpltr r�t c:utt suboilU.wills it-applications: sunt rate for lite three Inst recent cult- Beakers trridnq;in n State or aur t-+tai na- tf) A util.ien rettitiratio, [tout tine Ar'emthe inuftbi for which infurniattrdi is-.nal wlrug.toiest;35 percent tit tiro muds J a' other!i4tt•rtl a«corp?ai:vtarirs that: j:-urtiktble cxt:ecfls lite overage tetitrnal art I+e art w4de'a.•s psauotur cellitq. !o iii Fedrhal finauckil ax.i. anrst for tine urrcouArivnient rate for the=sutr w•rioxl sditmoult Storrs Iu:cd 61: till. relatire 7 project has beelt upinoveil and lite land.: td fella-. The A.-M-Aunt Elrerelmy shalt err-•ray of uneharWyntrut tar rare spate :ate iuuou4tiately available for lite praj- ratM•dil-^nod vitc priority to application: alxse the natsanal uncft+pinymrtif.rate. 1411.: lit flsi;r%tr):nly. lir) It Is to be tinderr>trrd that lite viii 'I'lie prajert toret:.all apphrahie tin-'lltr 011t3utittl: lhirtY iwrrcaL of piutttins:cellitsr assigned to eacis State Federal Mat tuly and relevant related ars amu+unu. al-proisrzat-d to carry out is not to estabfirlh an entitlement to arty rrtluiirtucnta;and file lawd Public l.orl:s Act shall )ie mhlimnrd level or project a.,:L-t:u+ce (2)Its written ectuflealiun that actual uvair lite fair di=trihutiou according to within that State (ulnae; such is the rousillictioa of ticn project it cs tint yct priority as!!Rt4f ttsloty: Istattst•>ry niaxstsum or nninlenttm) but t:s been IulfJatni because of lack of funding Q0 Pnhittt atsltis-atiosu substsittad by utopted only for lite purpose of further- fur the uon-Federal share. State or f•.)t al COW,onlents ulso!C Aver--se We the objective of assuring that ade- EfaERAL REGISIEr,.VOL 41, NO. 164-.-MONDAY, AUGuir 23. 1976 .,, - 0023 71 A .36721 RULES AND REGULATIONS Collate roasl+Irtation Is given to the rola- or reelChlntrhtuad vdUnio IL-.Jure-diction mmdicr of unemployed enrt;lrttctiuu th-c tire.;-A u!t:arinis sitUos..car liv:cmltt- ttttt:t he for a i+rojret of direct benefit to. workers as a share of Lite ovenill unrsn- lay. :'he:e Elie plaiening eellins; ealcu- or ptuvide employment fur,lereetsaployed ployed.Therefore•tit.:factor gives coal- ).all(I nit the forstu:a basis lc lass than penicins alto are rcrideuls of Wan conn- silerdion to construction unemproy- the"Intutury rninalmmn assured for carp m inity or ncigltborliu(aal. 'nie aplilic3nt tnent.'1103 factor will emiktitute 39 per- Slate the statutory minimum Miall be altall apply to Use State employment se- cent of It projccls basic sank. file jobse ninz ceiling,and where the plan- eurity Prenry for the avenge untrnpluy- till Severity and duration of tsnrnt= - ning ceiling calculated on the formula went rate for Use three most recent con- plo;ment,as meAsured by Use uneniploy-, lea,ts I:a greater Uian We ststutnry maxi- a•cutive months for which data Is avail- merit rate prevailing in the protect arra s Linn for any State the statutory meal- able'Ihe data obtained frau the State averaged over the last three months for i uttun sledl be the planning ceiling. employment security agency v.111 Etc ac- ahiell Bala Is available.Tils factor will (tit 120 d-ys after Use date one which 'eepted by the .4sslstant Secrelary. constitute 7.51 percent of a project's basic fund-;are 111:t apiwrtiwted for I,rograta tel 1t rrgttratad by ani sprang:silt, in rrtnk. asal•.tan ce under the Act aisd at any time delennutireg the unnntploynecnt rate ICI 'Ilse noes per person-moults of lherea iter Lite Asilstant Secretary niny of a local cov(rnment.unctooptuyusent in engddynictit.defined as the muss sit the rtco:aldrr the regitntal allocatiosu and WRse adjoining areas from whirl: the total coat of live project to the total Slate evilitgs previoasfy established and labor force for a project relay he drawn reuu,ber or person-nm-tills of employ- snaL•c su;lt adjustments as are deler- Miall be taken Into conxideration, nicest to be generated. In lornittlidltig mlree'ed to be reasonable let achieving the Ido The Assistant Secretary Ions Call- projmt prnitw.„tls,applicants should bear irliwsm or Use Act. - tanned from alt Statc ernptuymett seen- in mind the intent,of Elie Act to redacc j;314!1 lirtrreudnatiot or uteeropldy city ageneles their crooperatIon to provide srnesrgtioyment cesicrally,and to give due social calm all applicants.other th:trr Indian tribes, enitsideratlon to the amount, or uncus- . with eaictnliloyment data. ploytru:nt and underemployment In the (a) 'Ilie average tuumployntent rate tel EDA will not accept an item cloy- cunstructiort anti construction-relatrd, for the three most recent eoieecutive meet rale- determination that is based industries.As previously dmlicated,proj- nlentlis far%hlch data Is avallal,le for nti data obtained for a time Iterittol which rowls ellgoble for funding would Include, n Stair or local government aPpl"iit is linker Watt twelve sttrartlis prior to theilli are no!ilmitenl to.sucit local public under Uds part may be determinist front date of We stratification as stated therein, works lanjeelx as stttuddlnl'oniccir, inforesiauon obtained in Use following (f) 11se unesesptuyssient rate stab- courthotw:s,libraries,schools,ponce Prior urle•r: lislird 1.y one of the prucedures above tire stations, detention facilities, water (1) The Unifed Slates Department n/ sill determine rhetlter the area qualifies aril:ewer Hues,streets and roads,civic Latter. (11 IMA's QuallficaUtitt Vhislust for the 7e)percent or 30 percent category centers,1:1125eunts,healUi.cdurntion need has prurlded to EDA's Iterional OML= as described in f 316.7 above. snckof service facilltles,convention cell- and l cnnnailc Ixrelopment Represntta- tet Pro data regarding ustemployment let.-.and Ute uperadlnc of existing retell- ' Lives it list,prepared by lite United:;talcs rates Ent Ejnre periods after the date of Itzthrough renovation, relrair, and Mloartment or labor, which shows the lite apidhcation as slated therein,may be other related Improvements. I+inally, It at t r I.M unemployment rate for the three clean.isL should be emplta sized that supplemental rtttia.t recent costs-mutive months for: asislntucc provtdid for under Use Act (A) Utc cnt(re)Mallon; §31rw10 General ron•idrratinue and re- will he considered as part'of thud Carol- 11)each State:sold quiretsteub raw rrnaneial 0-Wance. er:t eu:.t3: the latter Is defiited as (latest-. It:) where available"Identifiable"lo- (a) 1•rola•t selection Itrocedure—(11 train all sources.sdtether IrLderai.State. real covecnments. Considerations.In line with the purpt+ecs or Meal.The cost Iter iierzon-month of Ute On or berm September 75. 197G. Ptd objectives of Else Act,ta).1's real of ernpluyntent factor will constltute30per- F.1 LA's Qimliticatton Division s ill pro- cha•sing pnijrcts havin. the grrttent iso- cent of a pruje s basic rank. Mid.,to J DA's Itegiunal Miices and Litt- tenti:d for furthering Illeso,pur"es.and tilt Additional considerations.A proj- sloinic llevelulsakent ]trprc:cntatdve.. a el.jcetivcs. We relative intportanre or cels basic rank will be Incrcl•ed if tree Inst. Id'crk•red by the United States IX— varioees factors In elctenninitnc this po- raroJect meets one or more of the folluw- parinn^nt.of I dor.whids will show the tential,nein Use availability and consist,- Ing eriterkt: average unemployment.rate for lite Utree en_y of data specified in the Act. the (A) Exhibits potential for providing uwrt secret eoosceuuve months for all- following project selection procedures late-terret benefits.The basic rank of a I,rdxitt:Atcly 1,000 couulicw Utrutichout Rare hetes adopate:el. project will be Increased up to it m.•txl- the nation. e-21 rruicct sclectior. formula. 71ee mean or 10 percent if it mends U►4 eri- (W) 11se above lists will be ululated ran@hig procedure developed for selttt- terdoti. The nutuunt of Increase will tie stead exinatded if and when more infor- int: ran+legis within each State's plan- detersnitied by the nature and extent of neatiat Is obtained [runt the Unites( uuig alincattau uses Chase project and the inns-term benelit(s) to be provided St al es Department or Labor. arra factors Unit will contribute mast by Use prooJect. ' (2) It not available from Ute United to aehierter;sntaslate equity In the distri- (11) Is mosensored by a general purpose Stades Ueliulntent of Iabor the average butfun of plannhuc funds and Insures-- unit of local government.as defined ht itsiumploymrut rate for lite threat smut Chad the relatively more econurntcatlir 1316.2 nb ove.Projects mecUng U►L-.cri- rirent rnnr.et utivc mutdhs for whirls in- efficient.projects arc selected.All factors lerfi t to I isave their lassie rank. fit fonuatiam 1.available shall be obtained will be standardized for eomieambility creased by rive pereenL Smite the State et_ploytnert security Cataria rs and a=Wned Ixoliey weights to (C)Itelatas to ext^^tial;approved pLsris og•racy, retire&their Importance In Use ratting and prurratns or is local enuunuuity de- 431 Indtan tribes shall suldtit lufur- ilnxet irc. seclop,meta&or realotal development na- •matleatt rte:nt the Plurals of Indian Ar- tlt Ptaslc rank..Ilse basic ruik of a turn car pr(uttr,tes or advances danger , I:nh< of lir United :taU c Tia 1,arinicnl prulnel wilt be dries stained by the fullus- nmiar p1:11m and programs. '111C bass•: of InlerWr or other at+proptiate sources foxlactars: rank of a projccl meeting this,criterion acrrptaMe to the Azz"t:oat Frere -uy. I.1a 71ic number of utC npluycd work- will lie inerew d by five perecnL •1.1 If mtjew%ted by tart asg4wanl• tlic ens in tite lit oJect.art•A avesarisl over lie Chi, Final rarsk.'Ilse flied rank or a ttnr:nl.lmmrnt lade of a 11W.4 covrnt- Warr 1mrA reeett tnatlh-:for wioie•h data project,i•:to be determined by sumnninc sucnt:hi:ll Ice b:i:.i•.l UlK.11 the tuc:upluy- a• itvail,uble. An arr..t elur.•clerimil as Use basic rank and inert-v;es attrihttabla latent rate of May rwuenunity Pur uri(:li- tt:aviug a high uttrtivi+-ynaent rate over- to Ilse additkanat coresideratlDns defined ' Ioc+th•iod (drflaed duloitt yrnasd to I.-o- all is Lesecrally ehara:ctciized as having 'above. laic^ or other stibilivision% car twund- a bijb uncanidolisient rate 1st Use cost- (31 Application o/ project selections ' aria:) at!Isist the Jur!<.S1eUon of single stets^.Hutt Ituhrtry. Similarly, all area /orntubt-0) Geographic eosesidenitions. local govern strut,except that any grant chsracteri7ed as havin.:a larl;e isund,er i'roJW.%aril)be ranked and ass meet rela- rttadc to a ixal covernmetit bwcd ltpa in of us.employed orcrati Is gencrally clear- tine to tattler projects submitted from the the unemployment rate of a conimuselty acterixcd as havloc, a relaH:dy lame sex:+_State until such Ume:s the Asslst- flDEiAI tEGISft/. VOL 42, NO. 164--MON"Y.AUGUST 23, 1916 00238 ' RULES ANLL P.ECiULATIMIS :lilt Secretary determines, putswatit to inrality as deterwined by file Secretary s:it renult of the devclopnsastL of a peh- it:araa:l:11-11 (1)(21 shote. that et-suiKtil- a 1_tbor fit aea'ouhisive witli the Iravls- fie vutks project With funtls rcreivtd suit of plojecls subntiUrd frau dillesrnt Itscon Act, as mikended (+9 U.:.C, under osis tart,as provfd,Yd for fn the statrt t. srciuired to cllltar further tltc .".7ta-27Ga-:a). U-ii(ortu ItelO=Uosz Assistance and Real purpDws and objectives of the Art or to (c1 It cont aisu adwitiale assurance by Piu}-erty Ac lublUon Polichs Act of comply with statutory rMuirc:uenL::. the applicant nod Iar azar"other partienw 19:U.42 U.S.C.4601 et seq.,said 13 CPIL UO ['riority comidrsutfoans. Within a:drliucd in 15 CF7t Subtitle A,Part S. MwL 310; raelt St•1te. projects subenitted Irmo th:a tie itersts a:.hall,un til cruuulL-of cel It tilt project Involves It detcnikUs me's Willi ten unetnplo;ttrcttt rade cx- r.-ce, color, se)r, or iistlosanl orl-^•ire, tae f3cillty, those rcrtlnns of fart R OL the eel-di;q;ihettallo»:al avaragv for the iamt excluded from participation in• be dr- Usmidnss Crhno Coutrol slid Safe trout.totu:ecuuve Utrae suot:lhs uIll be Wed tle lacneftt of, or be:tdajccted to Streets Act of 1960,as umended,found r:ud:rd and cOngLared only Milt projec. dkerhninalion under the propo%cd proj- lit 43 U.S.C.3750 b(I) and (4)-19)• sshtttittcd[ran otter meas illUd•c Sitiaar- cel:nod an a:.uutttre that it!s nut iu1- (d) Tl: provtdclts of 0;,In Circular fly rude::ory. Sbmiliarly, proirct: still- coltsd fit any civil riClds lit!,:aticae lir it "A-95.eRrept during tho lir•t ninety slays r, t+ttlleel by areas with nn tattclulduymrlit it,is involved in:a lau:atit or Frdrtal art- alter EUA 134q:ilia receiving opplicatlottz [:ata below tie rsuoltnl avt•1a:;e Iter the nunlArative actimi alhi;iitg di 5rrunitt:a- ohms this futowbtg prOeedurCS alma lno.:t recent eonSeeutve thrte months tine it 51mi1 state tile nate of tite mer., •apply: ,aill In tanked and rnmlcaittl only drills lite c putt idsere Meal.lir Lite natste lir the t tt Applicants mutsL subtnit their full puoject::sub+ttitted [roan olhet ait-as to agency involved in like admlid-AmLlve applkattutw-or nutiftentiott:of Intent to %lie -attic priority eali:ory. Applimaits action. npply to time appropriate e)aarinl:house who anticilctte Ute itrujCCL labor tMiuirc- (9) It contains certification, by the 05 early as pm:sible. ntrlats will draw upon the uttesnplaayed properly stuihuruxd oat:•lal at tine Ptd- I-s) Uimn subutLssion or mlapplicntlost and underemployed habser resources lit rral arcucy or Slate or local government, to EI VA.the applicant mast certify that other jure dicUous outside file inuitedl- that tits fluids budgeted nmd available or lie has submitted the full application to ate proJccL urea(such as a multi-county otherwise siaccilleally committed for the Use aprrOpri de cicaringhoIt, areal will lm given prlurity conAderatun project applied for in its appllention 43) 1:UA may bel:in processlag U1cap- uu lite basis of Ute unennituyment rnte shall Is-.rethtceii,d tululher4 or replaced plfrrtion upon Its receipt but will make prevailinC in lite extcaided reorntphical by tends tcquested under tilts hart. no Cnat approval of an application until (tlbnr marl:etl arcs.Sintil:arly,this Imxic fe) Altidiuuft shad:l be odviccd that 30(taps atter Its receipt littlas clearing- rant; couti+utatlotis diccu%sad nova; will fak.0 repro;ent:dinits nndior vertillcm- hawse response is received before 20 days be cttutputed In aiqanisate on algia pro- tions in connection with applicati-uts for leave elatrsed. vhted for Lite extended cvocrti9dcnl saan w-�4atance under this irtrt [nay be the 441 Mearinglusto is colunienta Y.-Ill be Illi► Project selection. Within melt basis Gtr criminal liability under title 1S submitted directly to EDA: EDA will SLate:uid priority category.projects still of lite United States Codi. cntuider such eunuttenta until It has lit: selerted oft Nte basis of Utelr final (de No cost overruns for public works finished irroe.e slit Ute appilmLion. ranks until the State Manning nMecation protects prerloirly funded under this Cel, All environmental requirements, for carh lariotity c:ateraryy has been rax- Isattwill lie approved. to lite 1112ximunt extent ligiu ible, as hate;I-d or u111,11 such time ac lite A:zi:t- • (e) 11rnject carts for admillb trntion, delermined by Use Assistant Secretary. not Sra-ret try del.rnnfues flint lite rt~• plarts,specificatitam estimates nod nthrr Incltdiosr.but not limited to: lrtatalmg futatis lalade:available under lite AIF: tw'la• widrll Itave bCCll lucurred ID Tho National Environment lsniicy ' .Act unist be reallocated atttl.tao; tite Friar to lite date of ap;alicaliun,will not Art Of 1969, as arnendvil (42 U.S.C- stat—, be lundtvl. 1 4:21 et seq•):and EUA's rtquirentculs (b) An application sluill be zcjectcd U) Atspdicatiutnr uill not tlormall7 fie foua:d in t MG.13 below utilms: ni+,rovcQ• where ally of the followhic t2i '['Ike Clean Air Act, ns anwift i (1) IL is p:operLy weluared on eppro- r)utlitirris eri<L: 442 ILS.C.1157-1158-1): priato lnrsms prescribed by the AmistallL Ill 7710 Pruject:Ile, fncltuliut.,en;o- (3)'111eFederal%vaterpollution Con- Sec:rtary. relents and riclts-o[-way.hu:lint been treat Act, its amended (33 U.S.C. 1251- 421 It cnutnIats cite of the followittc: obtained,clear lir ally cacuuibrances:of 134G): (!) 11!fmittatlun alaowluC that the arca 121 'Me isrrajcct request Ls[lir a sup- (4) Tlic Natonal Ifbtotie Preyxrva- conforms to nu arca tar which ttulted plentental to se:other Federal.Stnte fir tlutl Act of 1960 IN U.S.C.470 et seq y Stints 1)epathuestt of I-'IW uuCrnialoy- [neat 1,•rtamt which has not been approved alit! F:DAs requiresnents found "in latent statexlitx are avaiLable;or by Ute applicable gratlt arelley. 131G.13 below: til lincutplo;sntnt irdunetatinn faun 40 71ue suaxinttau :mount of !titan- (51 711e Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. lite n1opsuprlate State urcutpiu)silent se- CL-11 A-ziclance made available under tisk;' Its amended (10 U.S.C. 1271-1287) and cllsity-I"Clicy. I-st should stat exceril $5 million for F3)A's requirements found fit 1 315.13 � 13t It coadainc a trrtifiration b;the r-ela project: however, the Assistant bele:r: ap;d:r:naL that Coustsetdinm on Lite puej- r-ecleiaay tray, ht lit•;discrellol), Waive (G) The EntLingeted Specles Act of cel(las to-L}'t-t b:cu hdWitc.11: Us!,tatd(cy for coal entre. 197.106 U.S.C.1531 et seq.): 113 it canatal:ts amuratices, snt6tac- Ili) Projects which cannot be eom- 17i The IUstOritri atilt Archeological tory in tie AssiatauL Sccu tali'.that ai- iolrttvl within Luo year.: aIle. date of Ikota Pre%CFVatlatl Art,as ended UG site Ld+-or cilli tirgiti wiLhin Mucky rays appluval will nut be cr.•tt:lrlcred; hoar- U-S.C-449ctsert-):and of jerojei t a111n'OYaI: carr.lire A.-m6t-i'd Srrrct:tly may,bt Isis SII) The inti.and Wildlife Coordina- (51 toluic applicable, it relines Use dlxretio t, waive this iml,Cs for Coad tine Act Of Marels 10,193.1,as amended Prolsosed ilruject to rxtclitu- approved cau:r. (IG U.S.C.661-GG6c), pl:mts aanal pr a,-rants of n Ioc.%l C011111111- §316.11 Gnaa lernrt stills utGre 1'nlrrul (1) 13 CM 209.9, entitled "11eeords laity dr;rbgmacl%L Or tey:ituial dri-lop- I' assetAwlit•" narmt m:dun :.o a•: In avn!d lauuulid lir re•pa:r-e.e. . Ige 13 CI+Et 309.27,entitled"laud ILse eo4ly iucnnsk lenrlrc or rintit:ullrt incl;; Hach applir:ud :.hall, as a rnuditlon ue:ar Feeler"alah tieltt: IL reaattaitts cvl.leuer.a;bcr. lv a+i- to it.Im-lit(-f a sa-out antler list.Iwrt, (b1 13 CF71 20214, entitle-d "Ihricrr, talc•, t;r+t ILr pu-la+•anf pruyr t as ill pt-o• runs-:y v Pil Ih-:fallusutg relev.j tt rest- rnn:lntrtiun,and altcratlnn of buildings nude lir attruu:e Iutagrr tun-c)-L•atas and I ral srsa+:ireeients: to acrocnnudnte Lite physically haudl- losu^:disc: (:ea All labs r M.-auaLirds hs:Iudiag t 7) It coulai r. ad.•gtrate vw.ulsares th• t.-rel.-thig to tite Im.-nitettL of t:a+;c:, iU 13 CPR 30236, entitled "Project list all LaL-cncts at:d merhavica eta- a.-•r'--aloe cumdilirm7. asst!-Nckback pto- rmndificatiott;" • FIuye d I'roauae(or.:lir aulx a.c:nwlcm Itibiticas ttt:l try+:;d cntp:o;uaettt as pro- tis 13 CFit ParL 314,entitled."Prop- os lite psoposed project vain b: iaatd viatdl3CF'a3eto6: ertylnacs-trententstandard3•" wages it rates nut ha titan thuzo pie- till 71vine coltcertsht^ tel:•ca!!w1 dad Ila) The National FTaaL Insurance railing on rhnilar eoustitiction in the related paputents to a!1 p•--raors displaced Pic-.:rani and i DA's requireatcnu -c- 1EDE1At BEGIS)ET, VOL 41, NO. 161--MO)IDAY, AUGUST 23, 1976 . . t . . 00239 ...#GTI RULES AND Rf GULATIONS r F;aid1119 ffewd hazards tours!at 13 ME, affected: and data on lite exiMcted en- (2) F.I).4 will use the reaidta of this 307.15:unit -vlrosun-ntnl ingsact: •courdinntion prucros,even though cons- (1)dtherlaasaffeetingthUM.-ram. . (U) aftenhaUres to the proposed prof- .pirtlon of Ute process mal not be pas- §316.12 ect: sible,as It facto r fit making a trout de. fill) any envlronineu4d anali;sis pre- .chlon on lite project. (a) Ar9dicatons for esststattce under vfon:fY conducted by heal. State,red- this(•arL shall only Ile submitted to the 'crrl ugctelec:and §3116.1-1 Faisal drternsiltation. appropriate FDA Itegloual Office,us pro- (let evidntce of public reaction to Lite (a) All appllcuUuus for assf%tn)tco- vided lis 13 C111 project,wmlt as lranstrlpt:of lnctl.pub- •under lists parL shall be pros:eraecl h7 the (b) Anil'lcallutss shall be recorded and •lies heariurs lkrbl nit Ute pr:+lktral. appropriate EDA nlegfonal GtOce. de-med received upon Wrfr arrival at (3) FDA will Independently review' (b) 'Else lttalonal Director shall notify the uppropriate EDA Regional Guice. -and aualr:a environmental Information tine applicant, in turtling, when ft- ap- Cess PDA s.lukll endcavar, within rare submatt,,l by applicants •PlicnUon has been rejected and sttte the trutl:he; day:: trans Use date Ilse it)- its %here appropriate. HDA, witbllt resumle;tteivIor. Jdicatuul Is uclually received by lire 0d1- the GO d.sy Ionil,may srek lite view's of tcl 'llie lir:lanal Director shall for- praisdate itenkinal 011fce, to delennine other c mernmesiL areneies nhich have ward to Elie Amis-tant Secretary 1n Wash- whelber Ilse upplication has hour crus- •jurkAlfrtion by law or sitccial expertise Ington. D.C., all uppficallon^. which ire plclely and properly pnparel,nod eeuk- with respect to war envirwtmenlal ins- dt%nean.are pruperly cutupletL-d and ellgl- talmi accurate uncmldoyinent rutts.Ant parLtu%olml, bit-for:taslauceunder thispart npplicattort may be rejeettA Weviledi un- 411) If it project appears to Ire highly (11) 'ILe A.xststtnt Secretary shall re- Ic.s It contains full and accurate lit- controversial for environmental reasons view all a11111tfatlots received from tine formation Including Use requirements:of and Uscrelsaneed to further understand Itmion:d Directors and make the final Sectluit 316.10 abase.Uy the end of Ute lite basis of Use controversy,F:DA nuty, determinnuctn. fifth workhtg day atter the date lite all-. witlhl lite 60 day!hull,request Ute views le► If no detetmluatlon has been made Pllcathsn was received.the Ilcglortal Di- of concerned residents Ulrottgit a news- by the end of Use sixtieth clay atter the rector should notify the applicant if the paper notification or a puldic Infurtsm- application was received as determined iu algllfratfon Itas been rejectelf,still stale Ulut Inertial:held near the project site. f 316.12 above, tine application will be wlint It needed to properly eotupletc the (4) FDA stintl deny an application If, decnsed to be approve(L _applica lon. However. EDA starves the after consjdr:Mtfoln of the benefits of a.§31GAS Trrsninatfnn. right during Use GO day periotl atter project against any enrlronmentil costs, receipt of an appllantlon to reject an Pp- it eonciu.:cs that Lite environmental costs tit) An appropriate cMcbRI of the plicsttion for substvntalEy beftee Mcwn- exceed lite betse(its EDA may deny any,grantee may rtaluest EDA LO cancel or - :')s1cGe,hnlsroturly prepared,or Otherwise vppllcatiou solely on line basis that Its terminate a public works project ap- failing to meet Une requirements of this curironnsental impact atrtiysls dexloses Proved wider this part.This requcat insist Part ' ' that unacceptable nulvecse Itttlxtct: will be Accumpankd by it certified rewhatfutt §316.13 lstsirnnmental cua islrratinln. orate likely to result EDA,where nece:s. or ordinanu:e authorizing Elie recluestitsr :any,may eonditlain approval of a pnij- •Tarty to snake such recluest. Defore (a) T7te Vational J.acirsinales11111 P01- eel Up1in lite adoption of specified site=- agrcJno to such request, EDA will de. icy Act.(1)Sime the Iocal Public works.uses dmirned to mitigate any adverse•ternlinC the legal stfoclency of such re- Act reil"Ims aPplfcations to be primmed envirunllsental impacts, quest. a'Itlkil►Gr aloe of their acceptance.F:IJA (b) Tine National Historic Preserva- (b)EDA 1117 Initiate a cancellation or . will noLbaabletoprepare environmental line tet. (1) Applicants Shaft inelnda termhantionofaprojectapprovedunder Impact statement: for those projects with�Uo•ir applications either a state- 'this part for failure by lite grantee to zthlrh may slealficanty affect Use quality talent of their State Jlistorie I-r sercatlon adhere to the requirements of lite grunt. of the Ittunnn en iromment.however,to 011i;•er's views or the prulsowd project or• CW IrDA may Initiate It canceltaLloit Like fulIML extent passilde within thL- Miall tertlfy that their State IEL-toric or ler nhkaUon of a project approved ills- Linkc period.1•:IIA will aualy-c u prujict's Prescivalion Officer was Provided with a der this part whenever It dctenniue.-. poteotiai eucitunmental Impacts and sire detalltd project description and request that sucls taticetlation or teruallUdiOd!s appropriate consideration to environ-,for mintuents prior to applications sub- fu the best Interest of lite government mcmttd hnpacts In making It:final do-.mission to EDA. (.'anceliutton or terndmaliun slctll be ef- .clsiun. (2) if urcesesry.WA will attempt to•rected by deliverhic a notice to tike (1) In order that EDA may conduct complete Use eaudinaton of prognosed gruntce speclfyi ng the extent of the call- 1te rtivitronanktchntaf aria) sts of pralk..lad tsrojecth with Ilse Advisory C:nuticit on eellatlan or termination anti lire crate Ptoltxts,applieaote shall Include Elle fol- Itislnllc Preservation. FDA will use Vie.upon which It becomes effective. lowing nuderials wlUt their applicatiall, results of this coordination prwress,even exeept ulth resoled to sidnechuns C and thou.-Ii coogdetou of tills ptocers may t lective dates These regulations be- 1)It such hilaterials are slat avaiL•tisle it, riot be 1*ts:ible,as a tactor In making a.Come effective on August 23.10716. Which M%c Use applicant must so J)nal decision an the project. Joliet 17.Eurts. •cesMy: (c) The Wild and Scene Rivers Act. • Assbfunt5cerelary (1) a dcscrlptlon of those cletremis of (1) If acquired.EDA will coordinate Its - Jor Economic Development. Use pro)to-ed project'wltich will have an processing of a proposed Project with Auoest 20.1970. Impact Olt the environment. the ala- either the Department of Interior or the Lure of the envirattaent which will be Mparhncnt or Agrlcuiture. IFIL Doe.7G-24006 Piled 0-20-70;0:47 amt V. FEDERAL REGISTER.VOL 41.NO. 164—MONDAY,AUGUST 23, 19y6 .00240 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Appointment to the Governing Board of the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. Mr. C. L. Van Harter, Director, Human Resources Agency, having brought to the attention of the Board that a vacancy exists in the Consumer Representative category of the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency Governing Board due to the resignation of tor. Terry Jones, who was appointed January 26, 1976; and Hr. Van Harter having presented the Board with the nominations of the Coordinating Committee for consideration as a replacement for Mr. Terry Jones, and having requested the Board to concur in the appointment of Mrs. Mary Lou Laubscher to serve as a replacement for Mr. Jones; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Mr. Van Harter is APPROVED. PASSED ON September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of-the Board of Supervisors affixed this 7th day of Septeribery9 76 J R. OLSSON, Clerk t `} By�c.•,�C'a �C_ _ r�� , Deputy Clerk Orig: Human Resources Agency Ronda Amdahl Richard Cabin, HSA Alameda County Board of Supervisors Mrs. Mary Lou Laubscher County Administrator Public Information Officer 002.41. In the Board of Supervisor of Contra Costa County, State of California Seutember 7 . 1976 In the Matter of Biomedical Services for County Medical Services. The Board having received an August 27, 1976 letter from Iir. Rudolph J. Yannitte, President, San Jose Scientific Co., Inc., requesting that said company be afforded the opportunity of submit— ting a competitive proposal for biomedical services for the County Medical Services; IT IS BY TI-M BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is RE_vER.RED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: San Jose Scientific Co. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of . P.C. Box 5584 Supervisor San Jose, CA 95150 affixed this 7th day ofSe-atember 19 7E Director, Human Resources Agency Purchasing J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator , Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00242 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stale of California Senteriber 7 19 76 In the Maher of Refund of Park Dedication Fee On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to refund to Eric Liske, 837 Laurel Court, Rodeo, California 94572, the $300 park dedication fee (P.D. No. 198-73) paid in connection with issuance of Building Permit for Parcel No. 357-292-16. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 2976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: E. Liske Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 7 day of Sen*embcr 19 7' County Auditor-Controller County Building Inspector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By_ Deputy Cleric V,24 s,76 1sm 00243 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Legal Defense. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County provide' legal defense for Evo Chiaradia, Sergeant, William Updea7-raff, Deputy Sheriff, Charles Pitz, Deputy Sheriff, Brian Lindblom, Deputy Sheriff, Contra Costa County Sheriff-Coroner Department, in connection with Superior Court action Uo. 155659, ?,,Ir. Nurl Cram, Plaintiff, reserving; all rizhts of the County in accordance with Drovisions of California Government Code Sections 825 and 995. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CShe -Corone^ Depart gent Witnessmy hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors Count: Administrator affixed this 7 day of Sentenb,�r , 19 75 Public a-`or s Director tt��: r. roatcr� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By LG Deputy Clerk r;onnie Eoaz 00244 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sentember 7 , 19 75 In the Matter of Claim for DacaTes. Claimant '4s. t'ildred I. !-rade, P. 0. Box_ 557, San Pablo, California 94806 having filed a claian for damages on Au ust 4-, 1976 in the amount of ;229; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on Sentember 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Dubl;c tsor::S Director Supervisors Attn: "r. Zroa`ch ofi'ixed this 7 day of_ Sentember 1g 76 Count!- Counsel County Administrator _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ByL is Deputy Clerk Bonnie 2oaz 00245 It.24 ii-r 15'n i! TO: Contra Costa County Department of Public storks t(f+ Martinez, California :' i`.+lt; U PVILEC "'ORKs CLAIM AGAINST COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA (Government Code, Sec. 910) F I L E Date: AUG+ 1976 J.a. Gentlemen: The undersigned hereby presents the fol! in_aFwc 50A'0 wvvrsaas C' against the County of Contra Costa: 1. Date of accident or occurrence: 2. Name and address of claimant: J 3. Description and place of the accident or occurrence: - ., G t Z,�c:� 4. Names of County employees involved, and type make and number of .s, �;� equipWnt if known: ✓ 5. Describe the kind and value of damage and attach estimates: 10, �!i�-j.: �• � ��� � /�%%.c.�•-C G' !lam � �L�i �+',1, s � ��4� l7 t t�••1.1tiG :�.�tti.�.•..Cy._ C N tL �,+C�.��:r•z•vC�E'�l'� �ti.•t.a.i� ^� ` C ti i t LR-:; %1 L4% C�1•"L L. ja..l_-c. �. � 1',�ail., �Ii•e•c.ty .. Signature J 00246 -CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TO Mrs. Mildred Wade DATE June 28, 1976 FROM Public Works Dept. SUBJECT Claim Form Enclosed is a claim form and self-addressed envelope for your convenience in submitting a claim for alledged injuries. If you have any questions, please call 372-2105. - 5{GNETJ rCc:c*� �• - PLEASE REPLY HERE /10 15F 7,11 iJ V f f DD wam)cFIONS•FILL Lei TOP FORTQN,RfAlOYE LATE ivfUO.Vi AILD FORWAI D REMAIlittiG FAM NYM COSOF4 TO CERY.Flu.IN t0%%J2 FIWTCN AND SNAP OUT CARBONS.RETAIN - TRaRKJ1TE•R'�tw�Ahil'AETI:."'3 O+sGltiµ wRM r�:ry�,p, 00247 000 1 LA 0% cn .0 .. - q •fl ' O n G 0 3 O m 0 L W �•.O Vt tt G (: r' ¢ C7 Vj 0CL r .tCL rr W C r r0•,C+ W 9 q d 0 W X n ° R W tom1 O d �w Ln Ln t O O d • t 0 4 c . y• . 00093 rr to tn *Y� O Om Cly • OQ 0 m K 03 N rte'-1�- 00'k I d` q rr O to S. y m q rr to n • f . `v < aa' vq a 03 O ri vs rib P d { 41 i W tD C7 l t d d O d • f d O O CA c 75 t r+ • CL w 1 . f ' � ':...Ste• !�,. g^, � 1 • STATEMENT :8 t;:L ofmi.2 d 1• . •��/�41M�V! 1:Y�1/'i'�L/ �t� Eit-T�- • M.fO/ Sa�.�►i•J Z� I av wLa aaowgi•sera twnLo.CALIF.d ea D !� Fi rl�t' {• . tubi Pd riria'carooA a OST^rpR{.ZwtpSTa►* D • awwl ras+ooe o • +1111��('� �•'�� .Iq,•rYw R.ywa.rw �.•w.r�.'�yM+= -1 �•+ Nwl�� •., • •F\V�/ w•• {'N *•• •,Y•, r4 Py iY! 1 •^ t/••'/•! {• //•• ��II••��//�� •� VUI., C•1NDNS•DEpARTl�EN�� � Z .k IG• � x • 6 /��waraev.•wawawa•.rwe...aeorwawwwarotiawtrs r+fit :rADtt ••IPPNucC wYMwa•Ow .a,w..xa rna.•war•vw Ows1w•aa0." • L?t rII•�� a .. • 7.0 rr'L�e•r`i1 • GM1•Wl• • '• wL'S111Y1!I•i: ��• sIIK/IMaL paaP • '+' IstwMhO wa•Ww.a t:OMAX.C'•:" ''r ••i•-. i C' aa�e.••na a1 e..awar Tprr c•r,eaw �Mwwaa[w� ;c& 13 (roma Puz Itasca ' 106 Avt ..').V.ftGO zq i a it+:ti �:1 ' 4�:lT�Cti::.-ri i i:�. �.a;pr, �'�'+�► !,� - . � R:Lst.�:�r:°irY 1'.:f:l�:a� •. sZ�. 1 �`'� �;i i:• 1 i,'� fi•�•«+sip V�:Mw rt-r. ;LwL:.I � .�7• •''' •, ..�v.: 4 Co �����,� •' ' ,�•• �L ��� .its •' •..• +� a gal "-pjo.- • /•a. •j •• .' DEaJGTi!21i;!� f S S� •F S i BNOOKSfDE IfOSPLTALr� w ppp twpF{r oat:wwitwnola �, S, t • aas aao.Paseaaaasw '??..�.t{! 1�• s• MiMOLOGwro:• ` NACKOL.OGISTSt �na1•{e s.ru•re • a e••awed, s � .: aP+.a w+••rm•.rn un•ew aw..w rt .r a.••rw RAOIOLNlRAr1 iT: rrawwnaaa,ra ,' ww+..•._......rw r�rrr••.+•rw rw rr r••a r•• aar.r••► 002 •' .�. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of " Amended Claim for Damages. Attorney Howard H. Jewel, 1330 Broadway, Suite 1326, Oakland, California 94612 having filed an amended claim for damages on August 6, 1976 in the amount of $750,000 on behalf of Ruby J. Perez, Raymond Perez, Monique Perez, and Lizette Perez. ' IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid amended claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. _ 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid cc: Claimants Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisor Attn: Mr. Broatch affixed this_ th day of Segtember 1976 County Counsel County Administrator �' J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �/�!� _•i i i L:r ,� . . Deputy Clerk Robbie Gdtierrez' H ?t;!76Orn 0U2"5O (r7'CC �-0• �OGutQ2P 1 JEWEL,BOXER b E1NND Attorneys at Law E. D 2 1330 Broadway,suite 1326 REff!%�"^ Oakland,California 94612 AU GnG j9f t 3 ::GG 5 - 1976 �e COM"eesu"Awwo MV+eei J.L OtSWN 4 OM-2888 eofl\':"C GIF_ ClE 80AOC 5 Attomeys for Claimants 6 7 8 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 9 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL 10 11 IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF: ) 12 RUBY J. PEREZ, RAYMOND PEREZ, ) NO. MONIQUE PEREZ, and LIZETTE ) 13 PEREZ, ) AMENDMENT TO CLAIM 14 Claimants, ) 15 V. ) 16 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) 17 18 CLAIMANTS respectfully deny that the claim was insuf- 19 ficient in its allegations, but in order to supply further informa 20 tion and in detail, claimants hereby amend their claim by adding 21 the official California Highway Patrol report which was made 22 concerning the claimed accident. 23 DATED: August 3, 1976. JEWEL, BOXER & ELKIND 24 25 I j JUr. �.; i d HOWARp H_ JEW d 26 00251 TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT "'cPARTfAEE}T-0f: CALIFOR'JIA HIGNE"iY PATROL SrCCUL CO�J JWMa wr.I+-llra- LONY CII AIDICIAL DIS : I1I0- _.r_ . 2 ❑ U��sc, DELTA—(3Rrr l;""�1c�Q. 1 MO. A CoullTr R[PORT3.6DIISTRICT OEATEnt .... C.OI'�t 1 f2 A -G'?S-1A Co. O CCLLI:IJN GCCUMAEO DR 40. DAY TR. INtE11A001 CII MO. oFTICER IGD_.: I- �yr���, �iw� -a cca) s 121 Iz - IGSo 92 I- 1 ` 24ci 1,-. V C]OAT AT IIrt EMSECr1ON MIiw INAtAY,rQt�r�a,L,OA TOW Aw-Y STAT[RMT -_ 0 L1 Ci; A_�..'�/E•ILES_oF [-��LJ.�,� p (�J[, '[s ❑NO •❑TE3 j'FO. PARTY hAME U UI.T.MtOOLE,LAST) STREET ADORESS �o11N GAP-N e A 1135 t�EG� E.T`►" Si aNIVLR DRIVER'S LICA MSE NO. STATE 1 M w SE[ RAC[ CITY STAT[ PNOtIL aCo`tS47�t� CA c, q°' hz' �'- M Aca�oc-c-t �. =-- - O£S- TO M VEwICL[IN. MARE LIC[ E MO./� STAT[ 0116--ft's MAUL AM[AS DRIVER PA�KCa 4tia CTIO•.OF OniaCROSS{STREET OR NIGNWATI OWNER'S AGGRESS SAME AS DRIVER fj al• V `� CYCLIST SISin LIMIT OtSPOSIT10n OF VEHICLE [Is. AI aR IVER OM ORO[R!Oi VEHICLE DAMAGE VIOLATION CHARGED 13 ❑ EXTENT �j.00ATIOM - OTHER /� MINOR 400• ,,. OV 1 ❑ _ ` ❑MAJJR5LTOTAl. T 2 PART, HAMS Ii IAST,MIDDLE.LAST) STREET ADDRESS 2 _ CHIV[R DRIVER'S LICLMSE MO. STAT[ RIRTIIOATC SLI RACE CITY STAT[ PHONE o I DAY TA. TMal$- VEHICLE YR. MAIZE LIC11"I 00. STATE owMEA;S NAME ❑SAM[AS DNIVER M. PARKED V DIRECTION OF OM/ACROSS ISTRECT OM HIGHWAY) OWNER'S ADDRESS ❑SAME AS DRIVER TRAVFL CYC❑L 15i 317SIOSIi10N Of VEHICLE ❑RY ORIVEII OM ORDERS Or VEHICLE DAMAGE VIOLATION w v EAT[NT LOCATION OTHER ❑41man❑MOD. = T ❑ ❑MAJOR❑TOTAL 2 GiaUAtY71ON OF DAMAGE f=�QaF r�pep- n OM\;R'SNA'r�/ME ADONESS C WI U,D •C.0 NOT{ES ❑NO P. •C� EXTENT OF INJURY INJURED VIA=+(Check one) IN WITI.ESS' AGE SEX FATAL SEVER[WODU OTHER YISpt[ COMI4INT OF IAIY DRIVER {ASS. PED. 31 OTHER NUMBER IMR/AY DISTDRT[O MCMSER ..=ICS CYCLIST ❑ ❑ �Q ❑ F4- ❑ ❑ O O 1 u MAvE��1V� � PHOnL = AO]iC>S TAKEN TO iOWUNIO ONLY f 0 138 M{ ❑ o - ❑ ❑ 1� ❑ ❑ o N.N=L� [' E � `it. /3x 4o .HON[ 625-Z-041 -/E ADpHCSS f lV F— omeLQ (PP ) MLTW-[°OWbs?, AACMC3s ❑ `❑ ❑ Cl o 1 ❑ ❑G �7I '{)'0RNL6 J r! { . AIJ� /'irk T� N)L AaJ 7ESS J �i Ti l)C.I�i 1 1 1 ', TAME i I c IrVI .L SKETCH g�p���r2 MISCELLANEOUS rtiR1JEc. I- INDICATE YpATH . i r Cid 5c, VEHICLE:ICLE TYPE , I 3� r/2. PAt r► ty,I RARn M'P ; �� I ( p ROAD TYPE C- i-N A C°SYEMTIOMAL.OME MAY 1 - B CO NV[MT ZONAL.TWO NAY �I� !�=J D FRCLWAY v v/•',/ E OTHER I[APLAIM IM NARRATIVE) 3]](MEV.11-711 �f TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT , —EPARTMEE'T OF CALIFORNIA HIGH"1Y PATROL PACE —'Of- SPlC1AL GDNJ/fiCYi YD.I.J. N[ R GI. A)DICIAL DIS T e f[LOYi Ir�. MO.KILLEO N COUNTY /[I°AfI.O OISTAICf BEAT p = COLLISIU�OCCUNMEY O• MO. DAY VA. IIYC124001 CII M0. O[fICLR I.D. O 1 1 F 1 1 - V EIC*: ❑• AT INTERSECTIO.WITH InJUAY10'.0 AWAY FATAL 0R 10' AWAY STATE NWY ,J 4J OR: FEET/PILES OF ❑YES p RO Digs QNO ?ARTY MAYS ITINST.MIDDLE.LAST) STREET ADDRESS - DRIVER DR:VCR'S LICENSE MO. STAT[ RIN N A 3[i RACE CITY STAT[ PHONIC - ❑ YJ. DAY 7R. PEOLS- VENICLE IN. WAKE LICEYS[A0- STAIL OWR 3 MAY[ p SAME AS DRIVER TRJaX NE ' MAXED pSALIC AS DRIVER VfOIRECTIJN Of ON/ACROSS ISiRC[i 0.1 NIGMMAVI OWNER'S ADDRESS - 1 3 TRAVCL to- CYCLIST SPEED UNIT DISP031f10M Of VEHICLE ❑AT DRIVEN ION ORDERS Of VEHICLE DAMAGE VIOLATION CHARGED EXTENT LOCATION DTXCR p MINOR p Moo. 7 ❑ p Le AMR p TOTAL - - 2 PARTY "AIIC{FIRST.MIDDLE.LAST) STREET ADDRESS -RIVER DRIVER'S LICENSE MO. STATE - AIRTII.A7[ S[E RAC[ CITU STATE P-0016913YO. I OAY I TR. Ev "."C""'l VENICLE iP. WARE LICENa[w0. STATE OWALN'3 RAPE ❑SAME AS DRIVER ON/ACROSS IS TR..T OR N :IIWAT) OWNER'S ADDRESS SAME AS DRIVER TRAVEL ISI- CYCLIST SP[CD llYlf OIs►0117IJN O!VEHICLE p AV OR/VER ION ON°EAS Of VEHICLE DAMAGE VIOLA ION AR490 [XT(NT LOCATION OTHER pY1ROAp"Co. f ❑MAJOR p TOTAL 2 T OE3CRIPf IOn 07 DAMAGE tt d D• OWNER'S NAME ADOR[SS - N0TIf1[O Q Y(S OR* O EXTENT OF INJURY INJURED WAS(Check one) yI6 H. wIt NESS AGE SEX oil fAtAL SEVERE WOy.J Oi"CR V/.IOL[ COMPLAINT Of?AIM DRIVER ►ASS. ►[D. AI- OTHER NUMBER IMIURT DISTORT[°YTEJ3ER In111A IES CTCLi3T i'r -❑ ❑ ' ❑ ❑ Q 1 ❑ 1 O 1 ❑ 1 .0 wNAME r L A hiD �-t t s('t?F3 .t -?5"1- "35.4 S "°914 7 Z ADDRESS "V �' /f YAK( ��D/ 14 r I- # ❑ ❑ ❑ V� ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ O ❑ O NAME PHONE tl lY 1 ADDRESS ARE"TO gibluffea ONLT'I Z ❑ ❑ r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ r ❑ 1 a 1 ❑ o NAY! PNOME AOJR[S3 IA-99H 70 JINJU910ONLY) SKETCH MISCELLANEOUS Lt t b it1 . 2 rr 5�-; IYJTEAT[ ��( boar. MT,d—. VEHICLE_TYPE PARTV II►ARTY I ROAD TYPc A CCYJLV:IDSAL.0.9 wAV EIIf..--����'AE'�JJ B CJ'IVE!/f1o.AL,T'MO MAY 00253 C [7►R23SWAY I'� VVV D IRE[WAV • •- - - E OTHER►LSPLAIR IN NARRATIVIll •111 fR[V.T T-711 - +•�p i O LISION NAnRArI - rya' [Z/lQf c- Iq CACI I�N 9 td%_4 o N a P6b6tJPv-( 11A 0 1�cP 4�1 Q, L Co ljr-, 14 4mb C, PRIMARY COLLISION FACTOR RIGHT OF NAY CONTROL I Z 3*1 A TYpL.OP VEHICLE! T = S A MOVEMENT PRECED)N6 A VC SECTION A CONFROLS IVACTIOMIAG COLLISION VIOLATION B CONTROLS NOT FUACTIONINi A PASSENGER CAR A STO►PLD 11MCLUOES STATION WACOMI -� H OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING- C CONTROLS OSSCWTED ft PASSENGER CAR W/TRAILER D PROCEEDING STRAIGHT C OTMEP TNA%DRIVEN' D ND CDATMOLS PRES£tlT _ C RAN OFF ROAD C MOTORCYCLE/SCOOTER O UM\NORM• TYPE OF COLLISION — O MAKING RIGHT TURN O PICKUP OR PAMCL TRUCK WEAT)IER A KEAO-ON E MAKING LEFT TURN PICKUP OR PAMEL TRUCK A CLEAR O SID[SWI/E E W/TRAILER F MAKING V TURN O CLOUDY C REAR ENO F TRUCK OR TRUCK TRACTOR G BACKING C RAINING O BNQaDSIOE TRUCK ON TRUCK TRACTOR H SLOWING-STOPPING. G TRUCK ON TRI O SNOWING E MIT OBJECT I PASSING OTHER VEHICLE H SCHOOL SUS E FOG F OYERTURNED J CHANGING LXNCS 1 OTM[R BUS F O:nFR G AYtO//[OESTR UN K IARKI%G MAMCW[R J EMERGENCY YEMICLC LIGHTING H OTHER ENTERING TRAFFIC MOTOR VEHICLE INVOLVED WITH K HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION FROM SHOULDER."ED- A OaYLIGwT EQUIPMINT 1- IAN,PARKING STRIP OR 9 DUSK-CAW" A MOM-COLLISION L'DICTCLC PRIVATE DRIVE C DARK-STREET LIGHTS 8 PEDESTRIAN M OTHER M OTHER UNSAFE!TURNING D OAA:-NO STREET LIGHTS C OTHER MOTOR V9MICLE1 2 ] A OTHER ASSOCIATED FACTOR 1 E GAR.:-STREET LIGHTS NOT O MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY NARK OPE 70 Twwf[titYy % N Got SSE*INTO 6PPOSIKS FUNCTIONING E PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE :jtti.. VC SCCTION O PARKED t�.:' A ROADWAY SURFACE .y..- VIOLATION F TRAIN .. P MEROING V A DRY _ i` YG SECTION G DICVCLE a � D YIOLATIOR Q TRAV[LIM6 WRONG WAY' 0 WET ANIMAL `' - YC SECTION R OTHLN C SNONY-ICY C VIOLATION D SLI►TERM(MUDDY.OILY.ETC.) FIXED ORJECTA :r� I 2 ] i TGIMI.LFY-OwVp- YC SL[TION P1IYS1 1 ^� D IYARA ONE TO TwAC[ITEMS(.31 ROADWAY CONDITIONS VIOtai10N IM aaa O.[TO v_CX ITE..SI OTHER ORJitF E VISION OBSCUREMENTS _ A MAD NOT B[[N DR{MKIRS J A HOLES.OEC►PUTS _ S NB's-VNO(R IYFLUENC[ IODSE ATERIAL C\ROADWAY K *I.•CR_ F ItlATTENFION C "so-NOT UNDER U M "-- PEDESTRIAN'S ACTIONG STOP B GO TRAFFIC INFLUENCE C Ol SLPUC TION O.ROADWAY ^ O CO.SIPUCT.O%+E.•A IR tO%E A KO PEOESTPIA.1%VOLVED H ENTERIft5 LCAVt%6 RAMP D ON0 IM AIRMEMT . F RFOUCEO ROADPAY WIDTH 8 CADSStwG 1%CADSS'NALa AT i PREV10'JS COLLISION E VMOf%DRUG INFLUENCE I%TEN5E CF'C\ ..� F fl000FD J I;wf AMIL1AR 1011'"ITN ROAD CROSS( :Iw C �AOSSNALK-AOT AT OLPCCFIVE VEHICLa F OTHER PHYSICAL G OFNER�� C %. INTERSECT.,. K E04tYMtaF IMPA IRM(Mt• H NO UNUSUAL C043lf ID%S D CR;:SS...w- Or 1.CAD:SNALK ___� G /MPAI.TMEwT ROT K__?!.%. L 11%1%IOLwlO VEH.CLE _ E W ROAD-MCLUZES SNOULO£A — H MOT APPLIlASLE F K.TT IN POaD M OFHER• G APPROaGwt.G!L[aYtI.G lCNO)L rd MON[APPARENT INV ESTIZATEO .UY I.0NUMyER INVFSTIGATEO BE, 00254 I.D.NUMBER R£VIEWHO DY I _ t it ; ' • DRIOIDAL w0. .. DATC Of OSIDIIUL MCI91w1 TU4C IIAODI C11"MUyiCR 0Y/ICCR I.D. Ow[ SUPPLEMENTAL • y0. OAT Tn. SUPPLEIAENTS FORM SSS LDCATIO✓SUDKCT CITATIOV w7. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OTNER: SCAT FORM SSS NARRATIVE CITYCOV%TV MCIOR TI"D DISIRICT CONTINUATION ONLYk ar`' h c, r-- a=l ✓A `t-ED 5)r,- G r r-, R C• �c Palaf t)csl-n p . n1lrp(n)Lam'�4 f CTAef {� L8 11��r- I titin 75!: c . PREPARED By �// iI•� LD.NLu3_t R. PREP A RED REVIEw9D-APPROVED BY I.O.NUM9ER1 0ATc NA41/RAwr IM0.1 DAY� �1,.A�A 1 ". — 00255 MD.SAY tTs ' ORIGINAL 90. ..►.�, OATI Of ORIGIKAL IMCIO[MT TIN[121001 CII NON9[A OYIIC[:1,A. qM= MPLEMBITAL NO. oAr Va. SUPPLEMENTS FORM S.'0 LOCATt3N/"9JlCTCITATION NO. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OTHER: KAT - FORM SSS NARRATIVE CITY COUNTYM[►Ogi1NG OISTXICT - CONTINUATION ONLY rN ! hN 0 (�c��l� ��t.� �I F 12 ���� W iNInrC,, l Ib 1 (�G. l•�iJl 1 l / �j,t�ti '= vt\t PLO ij M� r-�j R 4 :gp r1:'A/ RlMzoN, In L S �t n PREPARED or I.O.hu..iFRt PREPARED REVIE'050-APP BY t.D.l:UInyER DATE _� OAT'Tq. MAN[/RANK MO.�OAY IY.T. -21 o t� • , `. oR1aINAL won, ^'� {/�� .-. �. • • PAG[ '/lis[! ,IJ�L• CN£CN DAf[O/0II61YL IRCID[NT •.r T 7 /2A001 CII NVYBLN aYllCElt I.D. SUPPLEMENTAL AID. DA. TR. ' SUPPLCMENTS FORM 507 LOCATION/SVNf[CT piAY 14N P.O. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OT ER: ltAT FORM 555 NARRATIVE CITY COVNTY R[/OR71Na DISTRICT CONTINUATION ONLY zaa-r If GoT- 1`�1�G4"1' 1�•�- �t�., Y��� it tal =_� t T PREPARED BY I.J.NU/43 R• P,:GrARED REVIEWED-APPROVED BY I.D.HUMBER DATE NAV[/RAN NO. OAY 1 Va. """A", O.l DAY TR. 5�Z7G 025'7 N M �a �F �q . ORIGINAL NO. IAO[ p DATE Or ORIGINAL IIICID[Mr i1M[124001 CII NUM3[R OFFICER I.D. CNECK On[ SUPPLEMENTAL ND. DAY •a. SUPPLEMENTS FORM 333 LOCAT IOyrSUM SECT CIrATIOM NO. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT - OTHER: IIEAT FOR14 333 NARRATIVE CITYCOUKT7 REPONrIMG DISTRICT - CONTINUATION ONLY ti r 7•/�rlf,9� �i'D�ifJG Te 0.4117i° f=�,•L�i�As Gn�ri6' �9AiB� S'.�"�1/'S/. 1//�'.� 1 L� : ,, 6ozs PREPARED BY 1,0.NUS49EPI PREPARED I REVIEWFO-APPROVED BY 1.0.NUSISER GATE NANI/RAYL! 1600.1OAY TN. NAY[rRa NK MO. 00258 OAT YR. s � _� Fchc ` OATC Of O»16111AL INCIOCFT JIHC 124001 C11 F'JNSCN SUPPLEMENTAL YO. VAT T». 1 SUPPLEIAENTS FORM 333 LOCATION/SUAIICT C1TAi10»NO. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OTHER:Ll KAi ic.: M 333 NARRATIVE [ITT COY»TT »LIO»i1NS O1STRICT TINUATION ONLY r c thV1 11.—C.Z ^r�7sL'" ()srf%P g�<<r-�•t v$ ,._� Q - -------- posl 'zCF't't C rN i&I c�Qry-r r-6 p Qr- A�Q�i�'�1LZs er/ INA ci IS A -RttLF�S (2r)AA L� 1 C L's �� f\AC) I-i U-( W W A PQ-��4_ tic mac,..• 1 -,o [I P-T �[C� Pt���L.��� Glt�� c J 40 fir!: T-- �c R tawmk ' - 1,J1�T F RAC LAS— TI NCS IM Ca $il F.L.. _.� 1 ��-t c�t1 LOCOL Pon- _ k -3 ��E��-��H� _ St�o - �t D� •�Jf3--�� �j` T --� CZ 0Y ,,(UF • UFS- l _t1$��3 • er— PREPARE.)BY I.D.Nt;43EP1 PREPARED REVIEWSD•APP D UY I.D.NUMBER DAT E IiAM�I T.LVR (J� �` MO. DAY TN. »AM1/4ANA NO.'DAY Y.T. � 7 �a ./- •. .. 1 ' , �•_W /ACL � �eJ� � _ tN[E[ � OAT(or O]141RA1 INCIOEhT i1M[11001 Cl/M'MdER OfflC[A 1.0. - DN[ SUPPLEMENTAL Mo. DAT TR. SUPPLEMENTS FORM SSS LOCATIDNJfOSf[CT CITATIOO NO. X TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OTHER: - O[AT FORM SSS NAt CITT COUNTY n[TORTInO OISin ICT CONTINUATION YLY p� f-- E NT (\ r-. fi - . Qe a Ap- 2V�/mn K2Pa h 11W OP L f 1 PREPARED BY TO.'VUM3 ER YFIFPARFO REVIEWED-APPRO'/EO by _ 1.0.NUMBER DATE S NAM(/RAv MO. OAY TR. NAY(/RAhA MO,I OAT'TR. 00260 ; : CM[C[ OAT[Of DAIGINAL INCIOCld TIM[124001 CII Numagi OFFICER I.G. ONE SUPPLEMENTAL - YO. DAY ♦A. SU P PLEY._NTS FORM S]S LOCATION/SuSACI CITATION NO. TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT OTHER: O[AT 71 FORM 333 NARRATIVE CITY COYNiT A[►OAiING DISTRICT CONTINUATION ONLYnp - t" %4 U mac- `S Cc R-Uc - aL p- ht 1--- fillITIA E 1 .,� '��> vc Acs clfk-rte e)A A min cd l o _ r FA I it-1 rr Fl�cr r_t� lit r , Aa-re crw(jttA -7 c— mp comp- 5 c m IN pm� N c�r dF g �� UJ J2}r' [� - A G) !r1 A 14 U") NTUE hi cm ^ t {c C6NIN I^' C{ 00261 PREPAREO BY 1.0.NUMBER1 PREPARED `' REVIEWED-APP VED BY I.Q.NUMBER DATE N+M[/davl MO. DAY 1A. NAYy AAN[ ` MO.DAY TR. PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL—CCP 1013a,2015.5 I declare that I am(amabbctjtRemployed in)the county of---.-----Alameda- ._...---- .California K4JLL\'Tll YMEpE MAKJNG OCQ� I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled cause;my(businessA{g*kR%jtaddress is: _ _..133A._BrQa4way_,.S.Uite_.1.3.2.6.,_Qakland._Ca.._x.46]_? w� On------ I served the attached._..Amendment_to_Claim..._... �ro _on the_-Reput —Caun:ty...Conasel ..._ in said cause,by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid,in the. United States mail at__ _ Oaklands CalOr(i _ addressed as follows Richard A. Bortolazzo Deputy County Counsel P.O. Box 69 Martinez, California 94553 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct,and that this declaration was executed on land California. IwrE� (TYPE W;:—+r/ uo Scrv.nalE ATTORNEYS PRu.TING SUPPLY FORM NOL 1: RN.J&NUARf M3 00262 I JEWEL, BOXER & ELKIND E j L E i 1330 Broadway, Suite 1326 2 Oakland, California 94612 JUL 15 1976 (415) 452-2888 J J. R OL%M Attorneys for Claimants OF su J 6 7 8 Clerk 9 Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County 10 Martinez, California 11 IN THE MATTER OF THE CLAIM OF RUBY J. PEREZ, RAYMOND PEREZ, 12 ! MONIQUE PEREZ, AND LIZETTE PEREZ against the STATE OF CALIFORNIA 13 I, HOWARD H. JEWEL, the undersigned, present 14 this claim on behalf of the above-named claimants_ lb My address is Suite 1326, 1330 Broadway, Oakland, 16 California, and this is the address to which I desire all notices 17 be sent. The date, place and circumstances of the occurrence 18 which give rise to this claim are as follows: 19 On or about May 21, 1976, RAYMOND PAUL PEREZ, husband 20 of RUBY J. PEREZ and father of the other above-named claimants, 21 was killed in a one-car accident in Contra Costa County on the 22 1 Byron-Bethany highway. The accident took place as the result of 23 the fact that the said highway e•:as negligently constructed, 24 , maintained, signed by the County of Contra Costa- Z5 i� The names of the _public employees causing the injury are � 26 unknown. JEWFE-OOXCR A •irw.vcry�:taw n DMDiDWAr.sul", t1�XLAND.GU/.!2112 � 00263 1 The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of 2 this claim is $750,000.00. S • 4 DATED: July 34, 1976_ JEWEL, BOXER & ELKIND 5 �J HOWARD H_ JEWEL 7 Attorneys for Cka'mants f 8 a 9 10 11 . 12 • 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ?- 24 24 w5 2s J'LVEL,90XER &ELKIND wT 1CwwM A7 iww' -2- &RMOW AT.SUITL.17.0• 00264 2CA PROOP OF SERVICE BY MAIL—CGP 1013a,20155 I declare that: I am fxXa::i!:z:a'icr cntl•luy:d in)the cuurnty of........._...ALAMEOA......�.-----.-__.._ _ ,California. 1s:.....:1 1....,:s•i:v::cicx"Or o0 I art mer the age of cif hteer aezrs and rot a parte to It.,xit:un entitled cause;my(busint.-WI S3ikI.410-4 address is: 3.0..Broadway,Suite..1326,. lifornia__...94612 _ on_.-july...1!k,_...1 7.5..._...__._____.. ___,[s.ned the ati r_h.,t..._ Claim ..__......urs thcClerk, er _.Board of Supvisors Contra Costa County in said cause,by placing a truc copy Our of er►clused.in a Scaled Catelop:with postaD.thereon fully prepaid,in the. United Stases mail at__11__11. Oakland,_ California__ _ _._ . addressed as follows. Clerk Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Martinez, California I declare:ander penalty t11 perjury that tht furebui:g is true ::d cmrr.t,and that tl:is declaration was executed oa California 1701:00 0,z•r.::1u ;,0rr:a7u0z; A;TOSNF,1'S P.7{\'i t�L'SU-4%.Y no 11 R(v.xvJA"197_ OO265 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Appointment to the Byron Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having advised the Board that a letter had been received from Ms. Judy Johnson, Secretary, Byron Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County, advising that Mr. Richard Lexis has resigned from the Board of Commissioners of said District, and recommending that Mr. Melvin Abrea, P. 0. Box 87, Byron 94514 be appointed to fill the vacancy; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the resignation of Mr. Lewis is accepted and Mr. Abreu is appointed to the Board of Commissioners of the Byron Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County for the unexpired term, ending December 31, 1978. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. cc: Ms. Judy Johnson Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Byron Fire Protection supervisors District affixed this 7 day of September . 19 76 Mr. Melvin Abreu County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public InformationBy liGl.Q� Deputy Clerk Officer Bonnie Boaz H-24 3/76 15m 604266 In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California Spptembor 7 , 197-6-- In 97,EIn the Matter of License Agreement for Bus Stop Shelters on County Properties in Martinez. (Civic Center and Flood Control Office) W.O. 5252-926 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute a License Agreement, dated August 12, 1976, with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District for construction and maintenance of bus stop shelters by the District on County-owned property adjacent to existing bus stops on County Civic Center property located on Pine Street between Marina Vista and Escobar Streets and on County Flood Control Office property located at 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez. The issuance of said License Agreement is catagorically exempt from the environmental impact report requirements, pursuant to Class 3, Section 15103 of the California Administrative Code. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 7 t1 day of September 19 76 Public Works Director (2) Real Property Division Planning Department J. R. OISSON, Clerk Transportation Planning By. Deputy Clerk . ear. L. Miller 00267 LICENSE AGREEMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California, as Licensor, and ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT as Licensee hereby agree, as follows: 1. Licensee may erect bus stop shelters on property owned by Licensor at Pine Street and at Glacier Drive in Martinez, California as shown on the -drawings attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A". 2. Licensee shall defend, indemnify'and hold Licensor harmless from all claims, damages, liabilities or liens caused by the construction, maintenance, use or occupation of said shelters saving only any claims, damages, liabilities or liens arising from Licensor's sole negligence. 3. Licensee shall comply with all State. County and local laws, ordinances and regulations-in connection with the construction, operation, use and maintenance of said shelters. 4. In the event of damage or the destruction of said shelters Licensee shall immediately repair or remove same. . 5. This license is not assignable by Licensee. 6. This license is terminable by either party at any time as of a written notice deposited in the United States Mail addressed to the parties at least ninety (90) days prior to the intended termination date. 7. Licensee shall be responsible for all cleaning and maintenance of said shelters and shall keep the property in a neat, clean and orderly condition at all times and not permit rubbish, tin cans, garbage, etc., to accumulate at any time. 8. Licensee has the right to remove said shelters from Licensor's property at any time during the term of this agreement. Upon removal, Licensee shall promptly repair any damage caused by removal and restore the property to its original condition. 9. Modification of Lessor's existing sprinkler system or any other facilities shall be performed at the expense of Licensee and in accordance with plans previously approved by Licensor. js:rrr.tjl T y� Y.,;th bcard cHd4er 00268 10. In the event any future relocation or modification of the shelters becomes necessary, Licensee shall perform such work within a reasonable period of time after notice so to do and shall pay for all costs incurred by said work. DATED: C �� ` cst�.L7" �- 1,970 - ALAMEDA-CONTRA COSTA TRANSIT DISTRICT D AS TO FORM By 3 .,<<'<4 an 'Bingham, Gener, Manager q eft I: Nisbet Attorney for M'trict :�•� Lawrence A. Rosen er Secretary Licensee CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Recommended for Approval: . By 1 roperty gent APPROVEO: F-'o 7153 By � ��/ ; Public Works-D rector Licensor - 2 - 00269 �_. ._-�.�_'�� 1•--_---• ' '. i` -------• -----�- - -i-----tom '`�-; i ._:..�,:_�•-_•� _•�_i - . --- =-- -•�-- = -. � --� ---. -- .---- —.. t �� ter, _:-___..._��:. t ..._ .� -_ • � ��_Tc 4 s � � � ; l T-1 Al no Ir - � ••- r---=fir*-- -- :---�- -- ,--: -�- - --• -- -— -�;-s-?-._� .-,._\ _ •_ ��� . _ t� ! , EXHIBIT A©UO Page 1 of 2 i .a c7j . . .i^ Vit... _ - - -`_ � -'-- � -� � � �� ..._ _ � - � _-__--- X - - - •---- .. :._. , -v1— VIN 74. iC wXHI BIT _.... .. _ ..v.,.... .. � ._- .__,. -t- - ... _ �-,J _ - 111 -.._.. ..._._..._. .._r-_-• .. .�._. _ e 2 df 2 ` 062'71 ' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Motter of Proposed Bingo Ordinance. The Board on August 31, 1976 having introduced a proposed ordinance which would permit bingo games in the unincorporated areas of Contra Costa County under certain conditions and having fixed this day for adoption thereof; and Harry D. Ramsay, County Sheriff-Coroner, having appeared and commented on the need for a more comprebenpive and regulatory ordinance to control bingo games, and having requested that the Board postpone adoption of said ordinance to allow law enforcement agencies an opportunity to study and consider possible amendments thereto; and Supervisor A. H. Dias having recommended that the County Sheriff-Coroner, 'County Counsel, and District Attorney review the proposed ordinance, consider inclusion of regulatory amendments and the cost of enforcing same, and report to the Board on September 21, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Dias is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregohm is a true and correct copy of an order wowed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Sheriff-Coroner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of �p�� County Counsel District Attorney affixed this 7th day of September , 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy C6& Robbie fJtlerro H.24 3P615rn 00272 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Consulting Services Agreement with Kister, Savio & Rei for Women's Minimum Security Facility in Richmond. (1003-097-7711-608) The Board of Supervisors AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Kister, Savio & Rei, Land Surveyors and Civil Engineers, E1 Cerrito, The Agreement is for a survey of the site for the Women's Minimum Security Facility on Brookside Drive, Richmond. Said Agreement provides for payment maximum of $1,500, which amount shall not be exceeded without additional written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings & Grounds Supervisors affixed this 7th day of September , 19 76 cc: Surveyors �` Public Works Department County Auditor-Controller / J. R. OLSSON, Clerk r By - cc. , Deputy Clerk Jsaa L 'AiL'i:r H-24 W6 151" 00273 �i l.�...`.,Lt L'�!1: iC i�•/1C�S /:V � :i`i Conditions. These Special- Conditions are incorporated below by rcfnrence. (a) Public Agency: Contra Costa County (b) Consultant's Name & Addre:,s: Y.ister, Savio 8 Rei, Surveyors E Civil Engineers, 11818 San Pablo Ave., E1 Cerrito, a iwornra :y. ► =�(c) Effective Date: September 7, 1976 (d) Project Name, Plumber & Location: Women's Minimum Security Facility ; -.id.. br i we, Richnond -608 (e) Payment Limit: Uot to exceed $1.500.00 2. Sirnatures. These signatures attest the parties ' agreement hereto: CO3NSULT ANT , By �.•,r Q' , Partner (Designate o 'ficial capacity in b+.:siness) _ State of California ). ss Contra Costa County } ACi,2iOWLEDG14E11T (CC §1190.1) ' The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknovtl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. ,•,::••••,::,:•..,;•T,,,,�.; Date: / f /, t.-moi•• C( /1. - �-/ t t ✓. PUBLIC AG:.4iC- / Notary Public / (SEAL) ::•., ,:..:, .:T„TT::.,,,,,.,,ts:... FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Ci ne Public Works%Dar or � John B.” Clausen County Counsel By �,x I �'�� BY. t Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to•perform .the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scone of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement or charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everyt irg pertaining to the :cork possessed by him or under his tort^ol at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemni_`'ication. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agenc and ics officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages,arising from or connected with the services provided ,hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix B 00274 5't3`ln'Y GUIDE Pict tv�,o�.sp� Ga • . 2. c_ !q 61 2U LL " A-5;5S0=5 M 'rP� 409,j f9Ar.F>2 �o►�rrrb► cos:A. covin-..� . �•4RCTct. Oa 3.40 3. P.cam.y lin--n and ea t eta FC I?otn--ciao Iwopeart- y lines ul h brsr3:,gs and lo:gbs used on the follel r.Z.- AVSL-SSoT!:s MAP A'tt'ALtr'LP Locate and desar±ba ang easz=ts ore: the site: !t, iopo 2rb-v K Bla7atimm on_._:GO foot Vid �'Onto=8 at '^� foot ;-- . .t__ Show tris following physical features: X roads X varka }c poles & guys X streams, hydrants X manholes �c ditchs s _`curbs J outline of exist- -A_culverts ing buil.diags and fences other fixed features G_ _ _ , _ on-site isolated gess of 3° or laner diameter :rit;h name of tee and spread o3 bran;hes shcnm in scales and =Uine of massed tees Z 002'7 of pz qv:;ty r1-_ ri;(ions ita 1'oLo.r-r �� ��a•�•,7 �� isles i..;•.;S ?a:1 .._;u.tr�l. rea to b. :1Ci:..El:Evil. F :ropart; cc.:•acxz. to ba i:cnvrwnt.c:ci with i-Lin. 211 i;ort tape by 30n long. .IY..F'raviciz bc::ir': :�a:•;; op niil=_'cs i allows:��-.����C�_Q�-r"�,'.^^�- .r !till. '.etatic.-au to be ba;_l on official dat= deurrib:d as ffiil:'tt3: t).'S. C�a�r .K �•.F':.nT.i�`TtG__�J� t��..-�z•� ss r�.i�....�.�:..�... 7. utllitics (sire and depth) ' I.w: LI Iires serving e t:;fo: lnGr. r Zup mul s ^rt or :t ;asst, vco nardwl n; cn each avai laale s-rtitar:: -c:rs lime, r �- t•s. a rtid 'l:ep a-id izi.�_t of t leash two c�...:h Dasins o.. eac:z Lva..�ble 3�Oz'.e lux. .Chiraotcristics of alt-civic po,.ur. 8. Draftdni Stirdards __&Prepare site plzn with information as indicated abova. • t . size to�be dtm,aisiarleci an follows: .4611V., 24"if.; lr..u z,.art;in yp., SZ It 1parlrl RL left. ��Scalc ci e`.^a:-._:er lu rnu:.L 2C} tt, • Provide nca-th ccint, Furnish. t:aucparency of :tu-vey on ct;Iar .film or Cwzi,,.r approved equal and prints. Tlda guide specification is interded to ot:tli.no only th—a Cmeral requiremerts of • he -services to be p�trfcwmed under tlti.:, a,r cep mit. VathirZ. herein shall be construed to Unit the scop and extent of ilia :cork necessary to �spsit the frXor=tion required " for tris project in n jl=cicr consis'.,cat ,:itiz good ergin_eri.g practice. Re.-mrks and additional req:irmonts: 1. File a record of mt=cy. .Z. Vgaytsm & B-,=nk rue,-UE61L*InM&oytz C«. I— Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency., furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) . 'Public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. �' APP�Nt7tx A 00276 ei O n 93 Q f ♦ Qw _ C -� �^ u a min = F+• � � T ullG' a _ .fpybb e, It k• !i ?� "' N o f tir t � 00277 I _ LAMo SURVEYORS O CIVSL TYGINEERS list$ SAN PADLO AVEfiUC ' - DONALD E.KISTER(1505.144I')! EL CLRRCCO.CALIJ. 94310 CHARLES J.SAYIO TELEPHONE IU-7660 ` LICENSED LANO SURVEYOR • MICHAEL P.'REI - REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER FEE SCHEDULE NORMAL HOURLY CHARGES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES _ ` CIVIL ENGIURP-RIZIG AND LAPID SURVEYING A. OFFICE AND PROFS SSI021AL Assistant Engineer $ $21.00 per hour Computer Draftsman. $20.00 .per hour • Draft sman - $17.00 per hour , - Stonographia-Secretarial $ 7.50 per hour B. FIELD IIORK 2 Man Survey Party $41.00 per hour . - 3 Man Survey Party j . $63.00 per hour Appendix a ; • 002'7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Relocating the Project Site for the Apparatus Repair Shop, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. (2025-2025-7710-603). At the request of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Commissioners, the Public Works Director has recocimended that the Board of Supervisors approve the relocation of the Apparatus Repair Shop project site from Boyd Road, Pleasant Hill to the Fire College Site on Treat Boulevard, Concord. The recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings & Grounds Supervisors cc: Public Works Department affixed this_Zthday of 1;op tpmb.-?- , 19 Z Fire District County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r :_� /IG(-G� . Deputy Clerk Jean L Millar I-?4 3/76 15m 002'79 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Approval of Consulting Services Agreement with Frank P. Bellecci Land Surveyor for Apparatus Repair Shop, Concord Area. (2025-2025-7710-603) . The Board of Supervisors, as ex-officio the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Frank P. Bellecci, Land Surveyor, Concord. The Agreement is for a survey of the site for the Apparatus Repair Shop, Treat Boulevard, Concord and provides for payment maximum of $500.00, which amount shall not be ex- ceeded without additional written authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept Witness my hand and the Seal of the hoard of Buildings & Grounds Supervisor cc: Public k'orks Department affixed this 7th day o%kgt h _r . 19 -76 F. Bellecci County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Fire District By Deputy Clerk Jean L hliiler It-34 3/76 I'm 00280 C3 S U L I::G SE=RV1C ES 4GP=::t»!r:+ 1. Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by re =renae. (a) Public Agency: Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Frank P. Bellecci Land Surveyor 2056 East Street, Concord, Californi5 =} (c) Effective Date: September 7 1976 ttpparaLU(d) Project Name Number & Location. s Repair o t ) Md., Name, '('nnrnrrl [?(]95-9(195-771 fl-hQ� (e) Payment Limit: Not to exceed $500.00 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CONSULTANT By ��..�,� _ ��Q�.� a Sole Proprietorship (Designate of icial capacity in business) State of California ). ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC 51190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, 'Known to we in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named- above executed the within instrument pursuant to its.by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. c G (7 (' aAPPHO UE AR)P SEALDate: / RICHARD PEARSON RARV VUSM-CAUFORMA ONTRA COSTA COUNTY hotary Public (SEAL) V^" :0.*-resJUN 13.1978 PUBLIC AGENC: FOED Vernon L. Cline John B.' Clausen County Counsel Public Works7 11irector r3 By: By: l .1 �, iOL: �. Deputy Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency :id Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: . Emaloynent. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant .ccepts such employment, to perform the professional services described :erein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments .stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. l(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works 'Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the ConsulCant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency ever.-thing pertaining to the work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, all a^ounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided thereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix B c Ocrofibrad with board order 0U281 SURVEI GL'rc,£ SF,'%irlCy CiS . Project Kar• -- PP,th.tz,,o.Y%.* Q6PAi 5414 R:GTL�o47MOV CzzSTA may, UV-o; 2. 1 Ttz.�;✓sr T�Lv�.) �: Cc�co�p` Grp. . Per Plan Sheet titled "Contract 2, Fire College Site Improvements", No. 325-74-2, dated April 3, 1974, Copies to be provided to Consultant by County. 3. Proewr%y acs and easex-ents v Y -.KLO cats and desariba antf esse=nts over the site: �to lopoxrF_ A Elevations on S 0 foot g:id =Ccntor,s at. foot intervals metre's E 3•"'736 ie�-er;i�iC Ow t Show the foncuing ph4sical features: .y�roads X stalks K poles & goysmte ---:•:.::�:- _ _h7d ants -3Z-manholes r ditr'ass _r curb's oatlina of adet- —c_colvaa is ing buildings and wg ,_ n a;-ateet! fences 'other fixed features _maces -�` spools, ssp+.ic tanks & drain fields Xca-site isolated trees of 3" or lager diaster vi`„h nmae of wee and spread of branches sh(rdn 1n scalep and outline of massed trees _2L_Pc.-ty-"31s adjacent to property lies. 223. ----�9.---; ° �o APcEuflIx :'A" - i - t I 00202 t in. ... a ._ .. . ... . ... . ise C4!e-4 6. Ise:t:m.^nt's r.M b,-mch r•trIm- .e,t.cpar• ty ccraur:: to Im rcuv:=tcd :r:th t- n. 2" 'gore pipe by 3091 lcrg. �1133. eLevz.1wtis to be b=r.23 en de12ibed as 10-a-aW3. 7o u W if:.les (si:.0 d6pih) f�a Iocation of a l' : no.:n =Jorgavrd L°•:ic-4 and all crrorhead lines shirr. lop and i—mr rt of at: lwst, i:co nar-hales on each available: sanitary sa-wrw line, and tep wid iziv:.•,ti of at least trio cat,-,h basins or. each t:•rei:.ablo storm yns:r;r h Characteristics of E72.E trsac pm-eI. 8. Iraf Ung Si•.r.dards x Prepare site p1cn with informat;on'as indicated Above. •Sheet-ems-- --3- heet size to be dimmisioncd as fol3tw3: 36"Y., 24"it.; 1/2" ma^I:in t3'p•,, i" nar Cin at lei t:. &Scalc of c!aVisrr: 1".oom-'s 2 St, i T ..=i,_. 'Musib�., M. i..._::._ ..web. .fit Pro:3de mertuh prints. `p11:nsb it•ancparencf of su vey cn rqlar fila or County approved egtml and . 5 prints. This guide spocificatim is intended to watlim only Lb-- general rcqm1re=ts of.the,.. services to be perfa mad under this a�,7co t mt. NcUiliZ herein. shall be construed to 33nit the scope and extent of the umek necessary to present the ir.lormation raquired ° for this project in a manner consietent with good practice* Remarks and additional requiremonts: • .a r .. - • AR/Mf�b_R.a�..4.,i.r�G�{ �►A_1tZ.�G AS tUAT'6l� �J�-Q�tAtI�S. 2- xnsurance. iN Consnultant shall, at so expense to Public AC-ncy, furnish ccrtificazes other evidence eccentable to Public Agency of (a) Public liability insurance of at least =.2$0,OM for all d--=mg-es an'isi ng out of bodi3y injuries or death to any one person ard at least fi500,000 for two or =re 'Persons in any one accident*or occurrence; and (b) a:operty dr--Sge liability inzu:rance p_rovid=rC for a l;..it o:-hot less than $50,000. Mlirty dz:ys' n , -S polic: lepse or cnz:;:ellatloa Is required. 2- ,APPeOD1X A" • 1 00200 SCFCEDI LE OF FEES . 1 OFFICE AND P^OFF:SS_iONAL Average lfourly"Rates Licensed Land Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$27.50 per hour Senior Draftsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . $21.00 per hour Computer-Draftsman. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22.00 per hour Draftsman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $17.50 per hour Clerical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12.00 per hour FIELD 2-man field party . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . $50.00 per hGur 3-man field party . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $72.50 per hour Stakes, monuments, materials and blueprints at cost plus 25% Electronic Distance Measuring-Equipment Charge: $17.50 per hour Olt $100.00 per day Electronic Data Processing or Electronic Computer and other outside services at cost plus 25% FRAM P. BELLECCI Phone: 415-825-4750 Licensed Land Surveyor (office) 2056 East Street Concord, Calif. 94520 415-228-2133 (residence) 5/1/76 dE /i V 00284 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE-OF CALIFORNIA In the „atter of Hearing on the ) Recommendation_ of the Planning ) Commission to Repeal Certain ) September 7, 1976 Sections of the Ordinance Code ) of Contra Costa County, ) pertaining to Comparable Uses. ) The Planning Commission having recommended to the Board a proposed amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County which would eliminate those sections of said code pertaining to comparable uses; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Tuesday, October 5, 1976 at 10: 50 a.m. is fixed as the time for hearing on the aforesaid proposal, said hearing to be held in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in a newspaper of general circulation. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. !fitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed. this 7th day of September, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Ronda Amdahl Deputy Clerk cc: Director of Planning Mr. N. R. Miller Mr. Robert R. Graham Mr. Anthony G. Lagiss OU28 . t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, St6te of California September 7 , 19 Z6 In the Matter of Tax Bonds on Subdivision Flaps 1.1ithin Cities. The Board having received an August 26, 1976 letter from Mr. Carl :7. Dozier, Subdivision—Supervisor, Title Insurance and Trust Company, transmitting a copy of a resolution adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors pertaining to tax bonds for subdivision maps within cities between March 1 and October 31; and It having been noted in said resolution that the Clerk of the Board of Alameda County is permitted to certify, without further action of the Board, that tax bond and subdivision require— ments have been satisfied; and Mr. Dozier having suggested that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County take similar action; IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORDERED that said suggestion is REFERRED to County Counsel for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing 1s a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. C. !-.1. Dozier Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of P.O. Box 2069 Supervisors Oakland 94604 affixed this 7th day of Sentember 19 76 County Counsel County Treasurer— Tax Collector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By `�;���✓��f' . Deputy Clerk �'.1 /� r Helen C. Marshall H•2J 3176!Sm 0040� t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Attorney John R. Butler, 1010 Co-wunity Bank Building, 111 t=est St. John Street, San Jose, California 95113 having filed a claim for dam=ages on July 30, 1976 in the amount of $50,000 on behalf of .rs. Elaine Pepare, 1424 Rernside, Alameda, California 1: 94501; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Attn: ''r. Broatch affixed this 7 day of Septemb..r _ 19 76 County Administrator Count; Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �' �'� /.' •� Deputy Clerk ' Lsonrie Boaz It.?-i 2174}Sm . 0028*7 DREYER,SHUERA 1,BXILTL :R,DUBBINSWXESM Attorneys at Law 1010 Community Bank Building 111 West St. John Street F I LED San Jose, CA 95113 298-5217 JUL 301976 CLAIM FOR DAMAGE TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS e P. O. Box 911 Martinez, CA 94553 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a claim is made against you for damages, the facts being as follows: 1. Claimant's name and post office: Elaine Pepare 1424 Fernside Alameda, CA 94501 2. I desire notices to be sent to the following post office address: JOHN R. BUTLER Attorney at Law 1010 Community Bank Building 111 West St. John Street San Jose, CA 95113 3. Date, place andother circumstances of the occurrence or trans- action which gave rise to this claim are as follows: At approximately 10:30 a.m. on May 8, 1976, claimant tripped on a raised area of concrete in a construc- tion area at the Daly City Bart Station. This area was not marked as dangerous and was under construction. 4. A general description of the injury and damages, so far as is now know, is as follows: laceration and scar under right eye laceration and scar on nose laceration and scar on lip and chin laceration and scar on right shoulder S. The amount claimed as of this date'of presentation of this claim is $50,000.00 which includes nothing as to the estimated amount of any perspective injury or damage. 6. The basis for computation of the claim is as follows: Expenses for medical and pain and suffering. I, JOHN R. BUTLER, the undersigned, am the person pre- senting this claim on behalf of the claimant above-named. Dated: July 20, 1976 JOHN R. BUTLER Attorney for Claimant BY RAYMOND F_ DREYER, ESQ. 00288 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sentember 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Attorney John H. Mount, 70 Doray Drive, Suite 20, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 havinS filed a claim for damages on July 27, 1976 in the amount of $125,000 on behalf of .'.s. Linda Annette Hem-+3, 11168 T`arclair Drive, Apartment «Cn, Concord, California: IT IS BY TIL BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ce: C1.i?cant Witness my hand and the Sea!of the Board of Public .forks Director Supervisors i•1ttn: 'r. 3roatch affixed this 7 day of September 19 76 County -Administrator Couitt^ Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By { L Deputy Clerk onnie Boaz r F L E NOTICE OF CLAIM JUL 2 7 1976 TO: County of Contra Costa J. t OLZON SUPWscas Board of Supervisors n CO, 651 Pine St. Martinez, CA 94553 1. The name and post office address of the claimant are as follows: LINDA ANNETTE HEMMI, 1468 Marclair Drive, Apartment "C", Concord, California. 2. The amount of said claim is in the amount of $125,000.00. 3. The date, place and circumstances of the occur-- rance giving rise to the claim are as follows: Date: May 4, 1976 Ploce: Martinez Marina, County of Contra Costa ' Circumstances; Claimant was an occupant of a sailboat being operated in the Martinez Marina Harbor area. Claimant is informed and believes and thereon states that said harbor area, at the site of the incident, within the ownership and control of Contra Costa County. Claimant is informed and believes and thereon alleges either contracted for certain dredging operations or authorized them to be conducted by Dutra Corporation in the Martinez Marina Harbor. The County, of Contra Costa negligently permitted these dred- ging operations to be conducted in an unsafe manner in that, among other things, they negligently permitted Dutra Corpor- ation to cause to be placed an unmarked cable above the water surface.. The boat in which claimant was a passenger collided 00290 with said cable, severing the mast, causing it to fall on claimant. 4. The name of the county employees causing the injuries are unknown. 5. Claimant was injured as follows: Injuries to back and cervical span. Injury to head with possible con- cussion. 6. ' Amount; Personal injuries comparable to damages awarded in similar type cases of injury and area. 7. The person and post office address to which notices to cla x=t should be sent are follows: JOHN H. MOUNT Attorney at Law 70 Doray Drive, .Suite 20 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 DATED: July .20,: ,1-976 is C?ti A •s LINDA ANNETTE EMU LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE W. KILBOURNE J? L,IOHN H. MOUNT Attorney for Claimant 00291 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stcite of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Amended Claim for Damages. Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation, P. 0. Box 790, Pittsburg, California 94565 having filed an amended claim for dams.-es on August 5, 1976 in the amount of $694 on behalf of Ids. Sandra Lawton, 1053 Second Street, 96, Lafayette; California; IT IS BY THE BOARD OPMERED that the aforesaid amended claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Attn: r'r. Broatch County Counsel affixed this 7 day of September__, 19 76 County Administrator e J. R. OL.SSON, Clerk By (_it.co CCti Deputy Clerk donale Boaz CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION PITTSBURG OMCE P.O.BOX 790 109 EAST FIFTH STREET.PITTSBURG. CALIFORNIA 94363 TR9sRo1 a;439.9164 EUGENE M. SWANN August 4, 1976 P.0.60X 1669 tttcuTlvt 01 It 337 TENTH STREET RICHMOND.CA.94801 ATTORMtrt: Taxp"ong.233-9934 GEORGE E. CHAFFEY ADORE"REPLY TO: PATRICK FILTER JIM GONZALEZ DAVE KRASHNA Pittsburg SARA M.LAKE LONA SAGE LEE F. SMITH JAMES G.WRIGHT F L fill G S 1976 Board of Supervisors J. °teas Contra Costa County a so IRA A GO- P.O. Box 911 Martinez, California ' Re: Claim of Sandra Lawton Dear Sirs: Submitted herewith is a statement of account from Dr. Acheson, in amendment of Ms. Lawton's claim against the County, dated June 28, 1976. The course of treatment for which she claimsreim- bursement started in July, 1975, and extended into August and September. The amount of her claim is the portion of the bill not covered by Medi-Cal, which appearsto be $694.00. Sincerely, CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION O. BARNEY Attorney at Law JOB:cb Enclosure. 00293 A. STATEMENT LAi�iTOrr 9 SANDTIM �, ' ° 1053-2nd St. Lafayette, CA • DATE DESCwt►TION CHARGES CREDITS I 'BALANCE __—...BALANCE FORWARD 7-7-75 office visit 35-00 35-00 0 ' 7-9-75 O-V- 35_00 35.00 0 7-34-75 0-V. 35-00 35-00 0 7-16--75 0-v- 35-00 35.00 7-21-75 O-V- 35-00 70-00 7-23-75 0_V- 35-00 105.00, { 7-23-75 Psy- Testing 70-00 175.00 7-28-75 0_V. 35-00 210.00 7-30-?5 O-V- 35.00 245-00 8-4-75 O-V- 35-00 280.00 8-5-75 O-V- 35-00 315.00 8-18-75 0-V. 35-00 350-00 8-20-75 O-V- 35-00 385.00 8-25-75 O-V- 35-00 420.00 8-27-75 O-V. 35.00 455-00 9-2-75 0-V_ 35-00 490.00 9-3-75 O-V- 35.00 525.00 9-8-75 O-V- 35.00 S 0.00 9-10-75 0_V. 35.00 595-00 9-22-75 O-V- 35-00 630.00 9-10-7 Payment 370.00 260.00 2-25-76 Payment 10.00 250-00 3-1-76 Payment 41.00 209.00 Payments made by S. Lawton 485.00 Payments by Medi-Ca 41.00 Balance due Dr. Ach son 209.00 PA♦ LAST AMOUNT /N THIS COLUMN Fbrm No.-PH EO 1 ARLYS N.ACHESON.Ph.D. 3490•A Butki,k Ave"ue PLEASANT HILL.CALIFORNIA 94S:n 00294 CONTRA COSTA LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION PITTSBURG OFFICE P.O.BOX 790 105 CAST FIFTH STREET. PITTSBURG. CALIFORNIA 94969 TctEPNONL,439.9164 EUGENE M. SWANN June 28, 1976 P.O.HOX 1669 EX=UTIY[011mcrom 337 TENTH STREET. RICHMOND.CA.94501 ATrosN[rs: T[LEPNONC,233.9954 GEORGE E. CHAFFEY , ADDRESS REPLY TO PATRICK FILTER : JIMKRAS F DAVE KRASNNA L E D SARA M. LAKE Pittsburg ZONA SAGE JUN 3 01976 LEE F. SMITH JAMES G.WRIGHT J.IL I SU Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Martinez, California 94553 Re: Claim against county Dear Sirs: This office represents Ms. Sandra Lawton in her claim against the county for damages of approximately $720.00. This is the net amount left unpaid by Medi- Cal from Ms. Lawton's treatment with a psychologist, Dr. Acheson, in August and September of last year. IIs. Lauton underwent this course of treatment and incurred this bill on the advice of her social worker, Andre Godet at the Pleasant Hill office, that Medi-Cal would pay for all the visits. In fact, Medi-Cal paid for only two visits per month. Mr. Godet's negligent advice was the direct cause of Ms. Lawton's incurring the debt: she consulted him prior to undergoing the treatment, gave hila all the facts, and relied on his advice. The county should reimburse Ms. Lawton for the amount of this indebtedness. This claim will be amended by the provision of further details and documentation, as soon as obtained. Its. Lawton requests the opportunity to present her claim orally to the Board at a regular meeting, after the amendment is submitted, and investigation has been completed. Ms. Lawton's address is 1053 Second Street, $6, Lafayette. However, please direct all notices and other communications 00295 ' � A BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -2- June 28, 1976 to'me at this office. Sincerely yours, CONTRA COSTA`LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION /! JAMES O. BARNEY l Attorney at Lata JOB/lph cc: Ms. Lawton t �d. 00295 rr 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 . 19'LL In the Matter of _ Referendum in connection with Proposed Senior Citizens Project, Bancroft and Ygnacio Valley Roads, U'alnut Creek Area. The Board having received an October 25, 1976 letter from- Mr. Ivan Netter, Imperial Realtors, transmitting a letter he had received from the California Housing Finance Agency advising that qualified electors must approve construction of a senior citizens apartment project at Bancroft and Ygnacio Valley Roads, "Walnut Creek area, in order that application for funding may be accepted by CHFA, and requesting Board assistance in obtaining the required local referendum; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to the Director of Planning and County Counsel for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Mr. Ivan Netter Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Imperial Realtors Supervisor 1366 North Main St, affixed thisJth day of_September 19 Z U'alnut Creek 94596 Director of Planning County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administratorp g ! G r'/���, J�� , y eputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall ' H-24 3/76 ism 11 QQ 00297 l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stdte of California September 7 1i9 76 In the Matter of - Adoption of Rebuttal Argument Against the County Jail Initiative This Board on July 6, 1976 having ordered that the Jail Initiative be placed on the November 2, 1976 ballot and having determined to submit a ballot argument in opposition to said initiative measure on August 31, 1976; and Mr. A. C. Will, County Administrator, having recommended that the County submit a rebuttal to the proponents' ballot argument; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the County Administrator is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to sign the statement of accuracy required by state law. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. W. P. Baker, Contra Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Costa County Taxpayers Supervisors Assn. affixed this 7th day of Seotenber. 19 Mrs. S. N. Ewing ) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Sheriff-Coroner / County Counsel By Qis Deputy Clerk Public t1orks Director !'a Cram County Administrator County Clerk (Elections) (P) +00298 STATEMENT THAT ARGUMENT IS TRUE AND CORRECT Elextions The undersigned author(s) of the Rebuttal (primary�reMftfal) argument against hallotpropositionContra Costa County (ia laser Wn-Ai") (name or number) Jail Initiative, Measure B at the November 2`1976 General "Flection (fide of election) forthe County of Contra Costa (ja=iadirsiea) to be held on November 2 . 19-L6—,hereby state that such argurrrent is true (sate) and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. (hi,nhe:r) Date SEP 7 1676 Sign Date Signed Date- Signed ateSigned Date Signed Date NOTE—All orcnmmb C:=rn,ei rued mane to Di. s(Section 35MSs 50).,Etertio" Case,sbau be accompanied by ibis form. ppyy each amber o[the arsameat.(ibis indndes=tz iu coeaection with state ittitia ire and referendum measurer,measares wLmitted by the 4;islavare'county initiative and tefesemam measures and other eouaty mnrures.and measures submitted at cmmtywido elecrioor•♦wy initiative and re[ereadttm ateawrea sad other mt7 measurer;district bead eleetiom etorpe School District Bond Elections: special aiatiow,if the bond of supervisors ao provides in its proclamation or notice tbereof.and irfeludes rebnttat ar¢umeats.) Q Printed 12.20.71 by Carl3rle Co.,S.F.2482-0'1.1 Form No.205-105 -N'T THAT ARGUMENT 15 TRUE AND CORRECT. Thu form may not be reproduced without permission. DU�99 Microfilmed with board order, f FILED • RLBUTTAL ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE B SEP 7 1916 (JAIL INITIATIVE) aox BOARD of SUPEMORs as a OO_ This measure could not possibly ensure- you, payer, a less expensive jail because it asks us to build a correctional facility, the type of institution only a state is required to build. we would be forced to make further studies and add special features meant for state prisons, none of which we need. ..all of which have to cost you more delays and therefore more construction money. The argument in favor of Measure B chooses to pretend that the County has not responded to citizen concerns since the petitions were circulated over a year ago. The old jail plans were scrapped by the Board of { Supervisors in February, because they were too costly. The Board demanded that new plans be drawn up, staying within the money already reserved for the jail. It also officially committed the County to follow appropriate state .and national f standards for local jails. For many months, a citizen advisory comira.ttee, criminal justice officials, and jail architects have been working to design a new jail that will meet these standards and will qualify for available federal financial help. This measure would not prevent us from replacing the ancient jail, which is beyond remodelling. It would tie our hands on the design of the new facility, however. -more- 00300 M's,rofitmed v�Ith board order • Rebuttal Argument Against Measure B Page 2 Every day's delay in building the jail means less security for county residents and higher construction costs. It is imperative for us to move on swiftly with the new, economical plans now being developed. Vote NO on Measure B. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors •fl' Harry D. Ramsay, . Sheriff-Coroner William P. Baker Contra Costa County Taxpayers Association Sally N. Ewing 00301 4 In the Board of Supervisor of Contra Costa County, State of California September 7 , 19 76 In the Matter of Adoption of Rebuttal Argument In Support of Capital Improve- ments Fund for City-County Thoroughfare System. The Board on August 10, 1976 having ordered that the question of a proposed ordinance creating a capital outlay fund for public road improvements on the City-County Thoroughfare System in both the cities and the unincorporated areas of the County and establishing a maximum property tax rate of five cents ($0.05) per $100 of assessed valuation be placed on the November 2, 1976 ballot; and The Board on August 31, 1976 having determined to submit a ballot argument in support of the proposal; and Mr. V. L. Cline, Public Works Director, having recommended that the County submit a rebuttal to the opponents' ballot argument; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Mr. Cline is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to sign the statement of accuracy required by state lax. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the fon"Winp is a true and coma copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Contra Costa County Supervisors Mayoral Conference affixed this 7th day of September , 19 76 Public Works Director County Clerk (Elections) County Counsel J. R. OtSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Doty Clerk ar r H-24 3P6 ISm 003V STATEMENT THAT ARGUMENT IS.TRUE AND CORRECT (section 5350.Elections Code) The undersigned authors) of the rebuttal (primary/rebutta) argument in favor of ballotpropositi on Measure loci (in favor ouasa;ust) (name or number) (authorizes a Road Improvement Capital Outlay Fund and Tax) at the General Election ([isle of election) for the Countyof Contra Costa (ittrisdictirm) to be held on November 2 , 191-6 ,hereby state that such argument is true (date) and correct to the best of their knowledge and belief. (kiahhe:r) Signaleutd, at 30 (C17�(Q Sign z �`- - �L Date S 7 1976 Sign Date_ Signed Date Signed Date NOTE—All artumtats concerning measures filed pursuant to Div.s(Seetiom 5504S750).,Elections Code.sh211 be accompanied by this form. sicned M tack author of the argument(7 his include arguments in ranoeetion corn aate;nitiaeire and refertndtuu measures,mc,=,rz aubmict Dy the•ler:islaturc•ovtmq iaitisnte and referealttm"wears awl other oouat7.ttstasurea,and meastue submitted x erwatysride elections:cu; imHutre and eetcrewdum oseawM and other city measures;di. bond e:cctiotts eicept Stkrw District Bond Eteetiotu: - special deetiens.if the based of supervisors ao protide in its proclamation or notice thereof;and includes rebuttal arguments.) m Printed 12.20-:1 by Cart;AeC F.248-1-0-121Form\o..Oi--STATEM F-I.T THAT ARC.VME:CT 1S TRI:E AND CORRECT. Thts form mar not be rrproduced w t permission• 00303 Microfilmz:d vAth board order REBUTTAL ARGUMENT FOR MEASURE "C" (A Road Improvement Capital Outlay Fund and Tax) The opponents of Measure "C" would ask you to gamble with your safety. They agree with us that the City-County Thoroughfare System should be funded, but their idea for funding is too little, too late, and too uncertain. They suggest that we satisfy ourselves with mere road patching until future elected officials are able to budget some of the money needed. Without an on-going fund for street and road construction, our road system will quickly become inadequate. None of us will be able to escape the consequences... more frustrating congestion, road hazards, bottlenecks, traffic delays, and resulting accidents. The price of ensuring the maintenance of our major transportation corridors is small. The five-cent tax rate would amount to only about 50¢ a month for the average $60,000 home. The toll taken by inadequate streets to our automobiles and future safety cannot be calculated. This is not entirely a new tax because the County has always budgeted monies for road improvements. However, due to the current fiscal-crisis, the Board of Supervisors has found it necessary to make reductions in many County-programs, including roads. The Board is offering you this opportunity to ensure that road construction continues on a steady basis, so that we don't face growing road hazards and burdensome costs later. A•"Yes" vote on Measure "C" will say that you feel your safety and the safety of your family is worth this very small expenditure. Jar.�es P. Kenny, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Richard T. LaPointe, Chairman Contra Costa Mayors' Conference o p 9 1916 �r E01,ZD Oc W =8V'SoA5 rn CO. 00304 Microfilmed with board ordor 6 . - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Stcte of California September 7 , 1976 In the Matter of Sub-Acute Partial Day Psychiatric Services As Part of the County's Short-Doyle Mental Health Program The Board having received an August 31, 1976 progress report from the County Administrator on the status of the Mental Health Sub-acute Treatment Facility, which recommends that said , program be continued through the fiscal year to provide additional information on the long-term results, although no significant reduction in expenditures for the operation of J and I dards at County Hospital has been experienced as yet because of an increase in patient admissions; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recom- mendation of the County Administrator is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 7, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Dr. Charles Pollack Supervisors Director, Human_ affixed this 7th day of Sentember . 1976 Resources Agency County Medical Services County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �(�!�,.• (,`j ,��t-c.�f` . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall tt_z<3179,,sem, 00305 ire Board of Supervisors/ County Administrator Contra JamaP Kenny / 1 Costa 1st District Cot rtty Administration Building Alfred K Dias Martinez.California 94553 ^l 2nd District (415)372.4080 CountyL lame E.Morb" r P 71 Std District Arthur G.Will v (-1 ILJ7 4t tri'.Bop~County Administrator rict Edmund A.Unacheid' 5th District976.I:Rviy�7Co..Aetrxr To: Board of Supervisors Date: August 31, 1976 Progress Report on the From: thur kl. lf'll, Subject: Mental Health Sub-acute County Administrator Treatment Facility On February 19, 1976, your Board entered into a contract with the ENKI Research Institute (now Cambia, Inc.) to provide sub-acute partial day psychiatric services as part of the County's approved Short-Doyle Mental Health Program. This new service began in March, 1976 with the cooperation of the State Department of Health in an effort to reduce psychiatric inpatient care costs at the County Hospital and overutilization of the State hospitals, as well as to improve the effectiveness of psychiatric services in the County. The cost to the State and County under the Short-Doyle Program for this service is presently around $35 per diem, as opposed to the $140 per diem cost of treatment on J and I Wards. The original contract was in the amount of $110,000 which was 90 percent State funded for the period of January 15 through June 30, 1976. This provided for day treatment for approximately 40 patients. On May A, 1976, your Board approved a revision to the contract increasing the payment limit to $144,000 to expand the number of av::,ilable treatment slots to 80. As with most new programs of tiAs type, the first few months of operation have been utilized largely to resolve various operational problems and to train staff. Nevertheless, the patient population at the sub-acute facility was 55 as of July. Although the cost of providing services at the sub-acute facility is much lower than at the County Hospital, there has been no significant reduction in expenditures for the operation of J and I Wards. Microfilmed wifh board order 00306 2. Members of my staff have met with Dr. Pollack, Assistant Medical Director, to discuss this matter. Dr. Pollack indicated that the number of admissions to J and I Wards had not decreased with the introduction of the sub-acute program. There has been a decrease in the average length of stay on J Ward, but the resulting potential savings has been offset by an increase in the number of new psychiatric patients being admitted during fiscal year 1975-1976. Historically, a large proportion of the psychiatric patients at the County Hospital have been readmissions. The anticipated effect of the sub-acute program is that the "revolving door" pattern of admissions will be broken to some degree. There does appear to be a downward trend in the total number of patient days per month on J and I Wards and at the State Hospitals. Dr. Pollack feels that this trend is primarily attributable to the introduction of the sub-acute program and will continue during fiscal year 1976-1977- As you know, the County's Mental Health Program faces an estimated $594,000 deficit this year, even with the $200,000 Mental Health Program reduction ordered by your Board. Much of this deficit is attributed to inpatient services at the County Hospital. It is the opinion of this office that the sub-acute program may reduce inpatient service costs during fiscal year 1976-1977. It is my recommendation that the program be continued through the fiscal year in order to get better information on the long term results of the program. RA:jep 00307 And the Board adjourns to meet on ,J at q *9.1y , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California. -J. P. Kenn _, irman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK De ut 00308 SU! ffARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOPS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, SEPTE,NBER 7, 1976, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EZ-OPFICIO CLERK OF THE- BOARD. K✓BOARD. Approved minutes of proceedings for month of August. Declared following numbered ordinances duly published: T6-49, 76-54 through 76-59, 76-61 through 75-63. Approved personnel actions for Civil Service, Probation and County Counsel. Approved appropriation adJustaeat for Noraga Fire Protection District. Valved reading and fixed Sept. 14 for adoption of following rezoning ordinances: 76-64 (2016-RZ), Alamo area, and 76-65 (2011-RZ), Pleasant Rill area. Adopted Ordinance 76-66 relating to sale or disposition of impounded animals. Authorized placement of Court wards in Plumfield, Santa Rosa; stork Training Program, Inc., Santa Barbara; and Lincoln Child Center, Oakland. Authorized Auditor to initiate legal action against M. Nall to recover costs owed the County. Authorized R. Giese, Acting Director of Building Inspection, to attend 54th Annual Business Meeting of International Conference of Building Officials in Des Moines, IA, Oct. 10 - 16; and J. Shaffer, K. Chrisman and J. Peterson, Assessor's Office, to travel to New York, NY and vicinity to conduct audits, Oct. 3 - 22 As ex officio the Governing Board of the Riverview Fire Protection District, fixed Sept. 28 at 10:30 a.m. to receive bids for weed abatement services. Approved revision to 1976-77 Area Plan and Budget of Area Agency on Aging and authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, to submit same to State Office on Aging. Acknowledged receipt of grant from Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare for Head Start Services to Handicapped Children. Authorized Public storks Dept. to negotiate lease for space for use by Brinks, Inc., in conducting food stamp sales and check cashing outlet in Richmond. Directed that vacant Class III seat on Economic Opportunity Council be filled by 50 Plus Club of Pittsburg. Authorized John F. Kennedy University, School of Law, to use courtroom facilities for classroom sessions through Sept. 16. Authorized Diable Valley College to use classroom facilities at Probation Dept. office for evening classes through Jan. 25. Approved recommendations of Director, Human Resources Agency, on process for soliciting names for submission to Joint Powers Governing Board to serve on Governing Body of Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems agency. Valved reading and fixed Sept. 14 for adoption of ordinance amending Ordinance Code Section 416-14.004 relating to refuse accumulation to include prohibition against animal excrement. Acknowledged receipt of memorandum from County Administ-ator transmitting co=ents on rece".endations of 1975-76 Grand Jury. Accepted resignations of E. David and N. _'hacker from Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council and aprolnted M. Erbez and M. Warren to fill the vacancies. Approved increase in contract contingency fund for Crow Canyon Road reconstruction oroJect, Danville area. 00309 �i September 7. 1976 Summary, continued Page 2 Authorized Chairman to execute joint exercise of powers agreement with Town of Koraga for transit service in the Orinda area; and appointed J. Lubin and A. Pepin to citizens advisory coavittee created by said agreement. Fixed Sept. 28 at 10:35 a.m. for hearing on Planning Commission recommendation with respect to request of E. Biggs (1997-RZ) to rezone certain land in the E1 Sobrantb area. Approved increase in contract contingency fund for Diablo Road Reconstruction Project, Danville area. Approved settlement and authorized Public Works Director to execute Right of Way Contract with J. Harvey in connection with property acquisition, North Richmond By-Pass. Appointed X. Laubscher to Governing Board of Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency to replace T. Jones. Acknowledged receipt of report from Director of Planning on status of Public Works Employment Act of 1976. Authorized Director, Hunan Resources Agency, to develop competitive bidding materials for contract to provide transportation of mentally retarded adults to workshop facilities and fixed Sept. 21 at 11 a.m. to receive bids in connection therewith. Authorized Chairman to execute the following: Close-cut reports for ACTION Grant No. 334-9036, and authorized Auditor to refund unspent grant funds; Letter to Association of Bay Area Governments submitting proposal for use of funds f-aw grant award for Emergency Medical Services; Agreement with JHK and Associates for parking and circulation consulting services In connection with preparation of EIR for Detention Facility; Amendment to lease with Fountalnhead-Montessori Nursery School for additional space requirements. Orinda Community Center, CSA R-6; Agreement with City of Richmond for geologic services to the City; Agreement with Contra Costa County Development Association for services In promoting economic development; Contract with J. O'Donnell for occupational- alcoholism consultation services for PY 1976-77; Agreement with JHS and Associates for special traffic study in connection with EIR for rezoning 1992-RZ; "Statement That Argument Is True And Correct" for rebuttal arguments to County Measure B (Jail Initiative) and C (Road Improvement Tax). Authorised Public Works Director to execute agreement with R. Garza for rental of County-owned property on month-to-month basis. Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 76/780, accepting as complete contract with G. L. Hasenpflug, Inc., for pavement reconstruction, asphalt concrete overlay and drainage improvements, North Richmond area; 76/781, accepting as complete contract with P. D. Marron Co. for construction of valley gutter and conform work. San Pablo area; 76/782, approving map and subdivision agreement for Sub. 4427, Pleasant Hill area; 76/783, accepting as complete contract with Branaugh Excavating, Inc., for asphalt concrete overlay on Moraga Nay, Orinda-koraga area; 76/784, approving subdivision agreement for Sub. *LS 46-76, Walnut Creek area; 76/785, accepting as complete contract with Heinson Construction Co. for pavement repair of taxiways within Buchanan Pield Airport, Concord area; 76/786, authorizing Chairman to execute Certification of Right-of-Hay, Certifica- tion No. 1, in co=ection with Kirker Pass median barrier installation, Concord area; 76/787, accepting as corplete contract with Sparks Roofing Company for re-roofing of various buildings at County Hospital, Martinez; 76/788, notifying State Dept. of Transportation that County claims apportionrent of Pederal Aid Secondary Funds and State Highway Fund money for matching for FY 1976-77; 76/789, fixing Sept. 28 at 11 a.m. to receive bids for installation of reflective pavement and ^arkers, Assessment District 1973-3, San ?a--on area; 00310 September 7, 1976 Surmary, continued ?age 3 76/790 through 76/796, authorizing changes in the assessment roll; 76/797, endorsing AB 3627 which permits increase in Conciliation Court fees; 76/798, rescinding Res. 76/738 which authorized consolidation of City of Richmond's Proposed Charter Amendment with Nov. 2 General Election. Fixed Oct. 5 at 10:50 a.m. for hearing on proposed amendment to Ordinance Code which would eliminate those sections of the code pertaining to comparable uses. As ex officio the Governing Board of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, authorized Public Works Director to execute Consulting Services Agreement with P. Bellecci for survey of site for Apparatus Repair Shop, Concord area; and approved relocation of Apparatus Repair Shop project site to Fire College Site, Concord area. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Consulting Services Agreement with Kister. Savin 6 Rel for survey of site for Women's Minimum Security Facility, Richmond area. Directed Sheriff, County Counsel and District Attorney to review proposed ordinance which would per-=it bingo games in unincorporated areas, consider inclusion of regulatory amendments and cost of enforcing same, and report on Sept. 21. Consented to withdrawal of L. !body from appeal from Planning Commission conditional aporova: of Final Development Plan No. 3722-74; and tentative map for Sub. 4878, Diablo- Danville area; closed hearing on said appeal, and fixed Sept. 21 at 11:15 for decision on same. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Right of Entry from PG&E for Olive Drive Storm Drain Project. Authorized Public Works Director to execute License Agreement with Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District for construction and maintenance of bus stop shelters on County- owned property, Martinez area. Adopted Ordinance 76-67 allowing transfer of cardroom licenses and raising fees therefor. Approved surety tax bond for Sub. 4798, City of Clayton. Accepted resignation of R. Lewis from Board of Cormissioners of Byron Fire Protection District and appointed N. Abreu to fill the vacancy. Anoroved recomiendatlon of Director of Planning that Board certify 1970 population figures for County Park Districts and Service Areas for transmittal to State Dept. of Parks and Recreation. Denied claims for damages filed by M. Wade, E. Pepare, and L. Hemmi; and amended claims filed by R.. R., M. and L Perez and S. Lawton. Adopted Fes. 76/799 approving street name change of portion of Ashby Way, San Ramon area, to Laguna Place. Authorized legal defense for certain members of the Sheriff's Office in connection with Superior Court Action No. 155659. Granted one-year extension of tine in which to file Final Map for Sub, 4724, Diablo area. Approved recommendation of County Administrator to continue Mental Health Sub- acute Treatment Facility through the fiscal year. Authorized Auditor to refund to E. L13ke park dedication fee paid in connection with issuance of a building pernit. Referred to Director. Human Resources Agency, request of San Jose Scientific Co., Inc., that it be afforded opportunity of sub='tting co.petitive proposal for biomedical services for County Hospital. 00311 -7- -September- 7, 1976 Summary, continued Page 4 Referred to County Con •e., sn - .h Adopted PCs. 76/799 approving street name change of portion of Ashby Way, San Ramon area. to Laguna Place. Authorized legal defense for certain members of the Sheriff's office in connection with Superior Court Action No. 155659. Granted one-year extension of time in which to file Final Nap for Sub. 4T24, Diablo area. Approved recommendation of County Administrator to continue Mental Health Sub- acute Treatment Pacility through the fiscal year. Authorized Auditor to refund to E. Llske park dedication fee paid In connection with issuance of a building per--It. Referred to Director, Human Resources Agency, request of San Jose Scientific Co., Inc., that it be afforded opportunity of sub:=Ittirg corpetitive proposal for bl=edical services for County Hospital. 00311 - 77 - - September 7, 19T6 Summary, continued Page 4 Referred to County Counsel suggestion of Title Insurance and the Board adopt a resolution permitting the Clerk to certify that tax bond and tion Trust Company that and Oct- 31 have been satisfied For subdivision maps within Cities between 31 without further Board subdivi- action. March 1 Referred to Director of Planning seeking assistance with reaaePl to and County Counsel letter from imperial Agency that Qualified electors to funding requirement of California Hs1 B Finance Protect at Bancroft and Ignacio V�lePProve construction of a senior citizen apartment Y Roads, Walnut Creek area. 00312 s y WA The preceding documents consist of 312 pages. .y