Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 02031976 - R 76B IN 6
FEBRUARY i TUESDAY I � Il THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1976 IN ROOK 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman J. P. Sentry, presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator and Public storks Director. 0M JAMES P. KENNYCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD Of SUPERVISORS M pan/wr.w DAMES I►LF1SRTEDISTRICT ANSY,.sRcaIlCaNt'MudttAD COSTA COUNTY 1AMCONTRA S R.OLSSON.cou.?1cLcAr. &XD[x 0///C10 CL9."0I TML 000010 Ao FOR 14RS.GERALOINE RUSSELL- 3"o DISTRICT J/1ME5 E.1401%mRTY.WATI1 * �,pVERK® gY THE BOARD 3140 DISTRICT SPECIA4.DISTRICTS' \Yt,RRF_N N.aoGGESS.Co" u{�48LR�RACK IOU.I.aMittISTRATION OUiLDiIiG =.: .� •.'_:- 4TH DISTRICT Gp/►lCD - . �•• �9 04001 w JAMES P.KVNNY.R/CNI.OIID CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JANES P. KEN.NY c,Nntwn.w .Asir DISTRICT ALFRED M.DIAS.a&"PA LO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY = awO a1sT111CT 65 E.µORtARTY,w�YaTTc JAMES R.01.550N.COUNTY CLEAT. JAMAND FOA ANO LZ OI/tCtO CCEwR of THE DCARO X9to ES 01 TItICT MORI W4P.RRFN N.aOGGESS.CO"CO.o SPEC/At-.DIsTRtGTs GOVERNED BY THE BOARD HAS.GERALOpIC RUSSELL GMIL� C4:a4 4TR a1STR1CT LOMUND A. LINSCHOD.PITTiNMO r' fl C'1A1i6E ROCK 107. -7K1Mt5T/tATtON BUILDING +►mow � 11TH OWN= P.O.scm oil >1 MMNM CALIFORNIA 94553 We HQv! A i**te%v Tetephom- tYvmS-or 372-2371 TUESDAY FEBRUARY 3, 1976 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) on second year Housing and Community Development Act application. 9:30 A.M. Report of special committee (Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) on procedures pertaining to installation of underground CATV systems in new developments. 9:45 A.M. Executive Session to obtain legal counsel on matter involving potential litigation. Recess'. 10:30 A.M. Hearing on request of Danville Parking District Taxpayers Advisory Committee that County initiate action to sell surplus property located on the westerly side of Railroad Avenue within Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking). 10:30 A.M. Hearings on proposed abandonments as follows (Planning Commission recommends approval): a. Ivanhoe Avenue at its intersection with Highland Avenue, Lafayette area; b. Portion of rustic Way, Orinda-Rheem area; and c. Alley D off Pacheco Boulevard, Pacheco area. 10:45 A.M. Decision on appeal of Mr. Alfred G. Schwartz from conditions of approval of band Use Permit 2047-75, Clayton area (hearing closed January 20, 1976). ' 10:50 A.M. Decision on appeal of Danville Baptist Church from Board of Appeal's denial of the Church's appeal of PnnAitinn ?Fn 14 imposed by the Board of Adjustment in 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Aaminis t i_a,.o�. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) on second year Housing and Community Development Act application. 9:30 A.M. Report of special committee (Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) on procedures pertaining to installation of underground CATV systems in new developments. 9:45 A.M. Executive Session to obtain legal counsel on matter involving potential litigation. Recess'. 10:30 A.M. Hearing on request of Danville Parking District Taxpayers Advisory Committee that County initiate action to sell surplus property located on the westerly side of Railroad Avenue within Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking). 10:30 A.M. Hearings on proposed abandonments as follows (Planning Commission recommends approval): a. Ivanhoe Avenue at its intersection with Highland Avenue, Lafayette area; b. Portion of Rustic '.ay, Orinda-Rheem area; and c. Alley D off Pacheco Boulevard, Pacheco area. 10:45 A.M. Decision on appeal of Mr. Alfred G. Schwartz from conditions of approval of Land Use Permit 2047-75, Clayton area (hearing closed January 20, 1976). ' 10:50 A.M. Decision on appeal of Danville Baptist Church from Board of Appea?s denial of the Church's appeal of Condition No. 14 imposed by the Board of Adjustment in connection with approval of .Land Use Permit 2061-75, San Ramon area (hearing closed January 20, 1976). 11:00 A.M. Time fixed to consider jail initiative and construction alternatives cited in the report of the County Admin- istrator on the Criminal Justice Detention Center and Court Addition.. (See Item No. 14 on the Board calendar. ) ,Wm ........... I Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued February 3, 1976 ITEMS SUBFIITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 11: CONSENT 1. APPROVE minutes of proceedings for the month of January, 1976, 2. DECLARE certain ordinances duly published. 3. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll and cancellation of certain delinquent penalties and tax liens. 4. ADOPT resolution directing advertisement for construction bids for the installation of median landscaping in Assessment District No. 1973-3, San mon. 5. INTRODUCE ordinance amending the Ordinance Code .to add an exempt clerk position for County Service Area R-6 (Orinda Recreation); waive reading and fix February 10 for adoption. 60 ADOPT ordinance (introduced Januar 26, 1976) amending the Ordinance Code to extend management vacation reimbursement provisions to certain fire district personnel. 7. ADOPT the following rezoning ordinances (introduced January 26, 1976): No. 76-1, 1948-RZ, Martinez; No. 76-2, 1961-RZ, E1 Sobrante; No. 76-3, 1963-RZ, Antioch; No. 76-4, 1964-RZ, San. Ramon; and No. 76-5, 1951-RZ, Fit. Diablo. 8. AUTHORIZE execution of agreement for construction of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 102-72, Pleasant Hill area. 9. AUTHORIZE legal defense for persons who have so requested in connection with Superior Court Action No. 157450. 10. DENY the following claims: Federal Insurance Company, 783.84; Henry T. Peck, x750,000; Anna Martha Clements et al, $500,000; and Calvin V. Shaffer, $120,000. 11. INTRODUCE the following rezoning ordinances; waive reading and fix February 10, 1976 for adoption of same: No. 76-16, 1914-RZ, San Ramon; No. 76-17, 1968-R2, Alamo; and No. 76-18, 1972-RZ, Orinda. Items 12 - 22: DETER IDIATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item.) 12. LETTER from President, Board of Directors, East County Resource Center, recommending that Ms. Jo Quinn be appointed to one of the two tenant positions on the Board of Commissioners of the' Housing Authority of Contra Costa County created by Senate Bill 1127. OBTAIN: REPORT FROM COUNTY COUNSEL ON ACTION(S) WHICH MUST BEE TA"M? BY THIS BOARD 13. LETTER from Mr. P. D. Reynolds, Danville, requesting that the Board rescind delinquent penalty (E;41.31) which was added to amount due for the first installment of his property tax. OBTAIN U-PO T ON CCMPLAIYT FROM TAX COLLECTOR FOR REVID-1 BY GOVERIR4F1'T OPERATIONS COIVIITTEE Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued February 3, 1976 14. LETTER from Mr. F. Broncke, American Friends Service Committee, voicing opposition to all of the jail construction alterna- tives cited in the report of the County Administrator, and urging that construction alternatives be considered only after the impact of programmatic alternatives to the maximum security system are considered; and SETTER from Chairman, Citizens for Community Involvement, urging that Alternative No. 4 of the report of the County Administrator (redesign and construction on a new site) be . given serious consideration, suggesting a site in the Martinez area be selected, the construction of a county office building on the proposed jail site, the solicitation of new bids from architectural firms for the proposed facility, the discussion with organizations such as the National Council on Crime and Delinquency as to whether fullest application is being made of alternatives to incarceration, and dialogue with citizen groups and indi- viduals on this program. CONSIDER IN COPiJUNCTION WITH DISCUSSION OF DETF11TION FACILITY CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVES SCHEDULED FOR 11:00 A.M. 15. LETTER from President, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency, advising that its Special Committee has completed an evalu- ation and report of the Agency's role and effectiveness in water quality management for the San Francisco Bay Region, and inviting comments on said report. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (ENVIRONIVIr TLAL CCNTROT) 16. FETTER from Assemblyman J. T. Knox supporting financial assistance for Rubicon, Inc. , a mental health organization in west county. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUI?IAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR REPORT 17. MIXORANDUM from Chairman, CSAC Transportation Policy Advisory Committee, asking for Board position on resolutions adopted by the Fresno County Board of Supervisors which request amendment of certain Government Code sections related to requirements for formal competitive bidding and monetary limits on public works projects. REEFER TO COUNTY ADMIN-ISTRATOR AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR RECOr1EWDATIO1t 18. LETTER from Attorney W. G. Broderick, on behalf of Diablo Bowmen, pertaining to application for grant of an open- space easement. REFER TO COUNTY AIxZINISTRATOR FOR RESPONSE 19. MIXORAN"Ml report from Director, Human Resources Agency, (inr" response to Board referral) citing the circumstances and recommending that the claim of Ids. Renee Poe for compen- sation (5245) of services be denied. APPROVE RECO201ENDATION 20. LETTER from Chairman of the Legislative & Issues Committee, Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board, advising that said , Board recommends the appointment of a representative knowledgeable in the field of substance abuse to serve on the governing body of the proposed Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. ACE 161LEWE RECEIPT 21. LETTER from Executive Officer, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, advising that the Los Angeles County Counsel has been instructed to file suit to challenge the validity of the Federal doting Rights Act requiring a bilingual ballot, and urging this county to take similar action. REFER TO COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER, COUNTY COUNSEL AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 0 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued February 3, 1976 22. COMMUNICATIONS from various cities advising of action on the County Solid baste Management Plan as follows: (a) City of Walnut Creek resolution approved as submitted; (b) City of San Pablo resolution approved with certain conditions and understandings set forth; (e) City of El Cerrito letter approved as submitted with comments by certain Council members; and (d) City of Pittsburg resolution approved as submitted but expressed concern about certain matters. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT Items 23 - 24: INFORMATION (Copies of communications iste as ' ormation items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 23. INTER from Mr. Frank Coppel, Continental Industries, Inc., Concord, advising of the impact of the recent decision of the Public Utilities Commission banning the installation of natural gas heaters for swimming pools constructed after April 1, 1976. 24. INTER from Director, State Department of Youth Authority advising that the Office of Criminal Justice Planning has made a grant of $544,000 to fund the Youth Service Bureau Act of 1974, pursuant to which the State will share in the cost of implementing a limited number of bureaus up to 50 percent, not to exceed S80,000 per bureau, and that both public and private agencies are eligible to make application. Persons addressing the Board should complete the form Drovided on the rostrum and furnishe Clerk Viith a written copy of their presentation._ DEADLINE FOP. AGENDA ITM+,S: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. April 19 1yib. 24. LETTER from Director, State Department of Youth Authority advising that the Office of Criminal Justice Planning has made a grant of $544,000 to fund the Youth Service Bureau Act of 1974, pursuant to which the State will share in the cost of implementing a limited number of bureaus up to 50 percent, not to exceed $$0,000 per bureau, and that both public and private agencies are eligible to make application. Persons addressine the Board should coaalete the form provided on—tom rostrum and furnish the clerk wfth a written copy of their presentation. DFA1?IINE FOP. AGENDA IT31S: WMNESDAY, 5 P.M. OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California ,To: Board• of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions From: Arthur G. will, February 3, 1976 County Administrator T '"0C'n TNFT. 0 05, OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California . ,To: Board- of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions February 3, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS I. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To County 030 Supervising Office Manager I Counsel Clerk I :01 ` Social 509 Administrative Administrative Service Services Services Assistant II Assistant III #02 Various Various Administrative Administrative Services Services Officer II Officer 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Civil 035 *Administrative -- Service Services Officer I Civil 582 1 Driver Clerk- Administrative Service Project -Analyst' - Project #03 Medical 540 1 Medical 1 Intermediate Typist Services Transcriber Clerk #09 Probation 308 1 Deputy Probation Officer II *Class only i ' n i i i a To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 2-3-76 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Public 062 1 Apprentice 1 Engineering Works - Mechanic Technician II #03 Sheriff- 359 *Senior -- Coroner Coroner's Aide *Class only _ II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS None. III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 3. Sheriff-Coroner (County Jail) . Add $1,000 for equipment at the Rehabilitation Center; this appropriation is financed by appropriable new revenue. 4. County Library. Add $54 for capital equipment; the appropriation s financed from the Davi Trust Fund. S. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following budget units: Public Works (Road Con- struction, County Sanitation District 7A, Equipment Operation) . IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 6. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Satisfaction of Lien taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Dolores Nino, who has made repayment in full. 7. Authorize settlement of County claim against Orland Davis (Contra Costa County v_ Orland Davis, et al. , Superior Court No. 137782) by entry of judgment, secured by a note and first mortgage, for County in the amount of $9,000 plus 7% annual interest, as recommended by the County Lien Committee. ow h To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 2-3-76 Page: 3. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACEMENT/RATES • 8. Home and/or Effective Department Institution Rate Date Human Work Training Program, $596 2-4-76 .- Resources Inc. 9. Authorize County Welfare Director to make payment to Lane Children's Center for child pre-placement trial visits not to exceed two weeks at a per diem rate based i on the monthly rate approved for this facility in Board Resolution No. 75/523. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 10. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Martinez Bus Continuation of $51,660 10-1-75 Lines, Inc. transportation to . services to 3-31-76 mentally retarded adults Department of Head Start $459,994 1-1-76 Health, Edu- Program to cation and 12-31-76 Welfare Janet C_ Continuation of $4,211 1-1-76 Furby speech therapy to services to 6-30-76 handicapped children at the George Miller, Jr. Memorial Center, West Joan Continuation of $4,211 1-1-76 Lefevre language devel- to opment services 6-30-76 to handicapped • children at the George Miller, Jr. Memorial Center, 0 90008g East 9 I v. 7W' ' : .., To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 2-3-76 Page: 4. VI. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 10, Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: - Aqency Purpose Amount Period Criminal Evaluation of $20,998 1-1-76 Justice Drug Abuse ($10,852 to Research Prevention and in County 6-30-76 Foundation Treatment money) Program Anita Thede Probation $1,750 2-1-76 Counseling and (State to Tutorial Services funds) 6-30-76 Judith David, Staff- training $1,200 2-1-76 PhD. for Pittsburg/ (Partial to Antioch Diversion grant 6-30-76 Project funds) Judith David, Probation Staff $384 2-20-76 PhD. Training in to Crisis Inter- 4-30-76 vention - Creative Program $3,990 1-1-76 Communications Evaluation of to and Research the Pittsburg/ 6-30-76 Antioch Diver- sion Project 11. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to execute contract for professional services with an additional physician for County Medical Services. VII. LEGISLATION 12. Establish County position on measures pending before the - United States Congress as follows: Bill Number Subject Position HR 8911 Supplemental Security (SSI) Support Amendments of 1975 ' 000W . i' C To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator , - ,,.. ,.. .. ..- �.�.... Re: Recommended Actions 2-3-76 Page: 5. VIII.REAL ESTATE ACTIONS None. IX. OTHER ACTIONS ' t 13. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to make payment in the amount of $270 to Jessie's Detail Service for removal of paint accidentally sprayed on vehicles by the County crew at the. Richmond Corporation Yard on December 17, 1975. 14. Authorize County Medical Services to furnish a limited number of meals to the Meals on Wheels Program with the understanding that the County will receive $1.40 per meal. 15. Declare two used animal control truck bodies surplus property, and direct the County Purchasing Agent to sell said property to the County of Sonoma for $700 each, as recommended by the Public storks Director. 16. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements for sale of tax deeded properties to the City of Antioch and the Moraga School District for the amounts .of $550 and $390, respectively, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. . 17. Endorse County Supervisors Association of California position paper on dompulsory binding arbitration, as recommended by the County Director of Personnel. 18. Authorize reimbursement of $34.75 to Mr. Don Flory for damage to personal property incurred while on duty at the County Hospital. 19. Authorize U.S.C. Graduate School use of one conference room at 2525 Stanwell Drive for a class in Correctional Administration during the period February through May, 1976, as recommended by the County Probation Officer. No additional costs will be incurred by the County. 20. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum from County Administrator recommending approval of the Safe Driving Awards Program in the Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner, and as recom- mended therein approve the program and authorize the County Auditor-Controller to purchase items to be presented to employees by the Sheriff-Coroner for reaching the mileage requirements established by the program. %*10 i { E To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 2-3-76 Page: 6. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens -in attendance at the meeting subject to. carryirig forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration- of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 PM r j0011 Y CONTRA COSTA CQUN s , WORKS',,E�EPA,RT T t c"krtZne2, ""Ca .2C)YTF�c� Febru4t� 19 XXTRA' B .US -INESS SUPER'VISQRIAL DISTRICT V Item lr. SUBDIVISION 46$6 - APPROVE MAUP AND AGRMNT � A1 lamo a Area a Y It ,is recommended that the Hoard of Supeacvisors agprarue a the map and Subdivision agreement for Subdiv siom,,458�. " Owner: White Gate Developers, 2354 Stanwell Drive, N2 zx Conccrd, C-A 94520 vM Location: Off White Gate .Road approximatelyon6--h ilE ;i „rf " . ` "Mile east of the Stone ,Valle Road iclr.Green Valley Road intersection.' MPI w item 2. SUBDMSION 4685 - APPROVE HAP AND AGzE MMT , ' Area Y r Dom : it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors appraue the nap and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivisiaa "4685 you Owner: white Gate Developers, 2354 Stanwell Concord, CA 34520 Location: off Shite Gate Road approximately one halt" �p mi le east of the Stone Valley Road and Green � >" Valley Read intersection.. r RR 4 d f S FY M. f S Y is k g 3 # t h I t r g;, nt A i� {7pr. EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works' Departme Page 1 of ? February 3, 1976 E: INN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California February 3, 1976 AGENDA REPORTS bone SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. ARLINGTON AVENUE - PUBLIC MEETING - Kensington Area A public meeting has been scheduled for Wednesday, February 18, 1976, at 7:30 p.m. in the Multi-Use Room of the Kensington Elementary School, 90 Highland Boulevard, Kensington, to discuss the proposed Arlington Avenue reconstruction project. The purpose of the meeting is to inform all interested persons of the proposed project, the estimated time schedule, details of the project, and other.matters of interest. All concerned residents, property owners, and other interested persons are invited. Information only. No Board action required. (RE: Project No. 1451-4525-72) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 2. WATERFRONT ROAD (PEYTON) OVERCROSSING - APPROVE AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZE REQUEST FOR ALLOCATION - Martinez Area The County in cooperation with the City of Martinez, has pre- pared preliminary plans for the reconstruction of the Waterfront Road (Peyton) Overcrossing of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company tracks east of I-680. This proposed project may be eli- gible for 80 percent financing from the State Grade Separation Fund which is administered by the State Department of Trans- portation. In this event, the remaining 20 percent of the pro- ' Jett cost would be shared equally by the County and the City of Martinez. To proceed with the prerequisite steps to obtaining an allocation from the State Grade Separation Fund, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve and authorize its Chairman to execute a Joint Exercise o€ Powers Agreement with the City of Martinez. This Agreement provides for equal sharing of the local project costs. The County's and City's shares are esti- mated to be $97,200 each. 2. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to request an allocation for this project from the State Grade Separation Funds and certifying, contingent upon receiving an eO percent allocation from the State Grade Separation Funds, the folladiag: (Continued on next page) AGENDA Public Works Department i Page 1 of 7 February 3, 1976 IA 7 1 Item 2 Continued: a_ That sufgicient local funds will be made available by the County of Contra Costa as the work of the project progresses; and b. The County intends to accorglish all necessary matters prerequisite to awarding the contract and to r--A ear 71-r-e-t fnr t'h r^^ of th 1--- -Ost would be shared equally by the County and the City of Martinez. To Proceed with the prerequisite steps to obtaining an allocation from the State Grade Separation Fund, Board of Supervisors: it is recommended that the 1- Approve and authorize its Chairman to execute a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the City of Martinez. This Agreement provides for equal sharing of the local Project costs. The County's and City's shares are esti- mated to be $97,e00 each. 2. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to request an allocation for this project from the State Grade Separation Funds and certifying, contingent upon receiving an eO percent allocation from the State Grade Separation Funds, the foliari,ag: (Continued on next page) Page G E N_ D A1 of 7 Public Works Department - February 3, 1976 - jj ~ f item 2 Continued: j a. That sufficient local funds will be made available r by the County of Contra Costa as the work of the project progresses, and b. The County intends to accorplish all necessary matters prerequisite to awarding the contract and to award a contract for the construction of the Waterfront Road Project no later than one year after the date an allocation is received. This project was approved by the Board on January 26, 1476, and all environmental matters have been previously complied with. (RE: Project No. 3481-4215-74) (NOTE TO CLERK;. OF iHE BOARD: Please return one original of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, the Hoard Order and the Resolution to the Public Works Department for further processing.) (RD) Item 3. PROSPECT AM-'UE - STREET NAM CHMGE - Port Costa Area Through a routine inspection of County records, the Public Works Department has found that over the years the street names of Prospect Avenue, 2nd Street, and lith Street are signed in the field differently than shown on the old map of the town of Port Costa. In order to clarify the map records, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors set larch 2, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. as the'date and time for a public bearing to consider changing the names, sbown on the old tern map on portions of 2nd Street and 11th Street, to conform to the actual signed and commonly used names as follows: I. Change the namae of that portion shewn on the old town map as 2nd Street to PROSPECT AV%:l'tFE, beginning at the inter- section of Canyon Lance Drive and extending northerly a distance of 0.02 mile. 2. Change the name of that portion shown on the old town map as 11th Street to PROSPECT AVE,= beginning at the inter- section shown on tKe o map ap as 2nd Street and extending easterly and northerly to its point of termination a distance of 0.17 mile. (TO) Item 4. BARRY SILL ROAD - STREET NAHE- CBAMGE - FRANKLIN CANYON - Martinez Area Several years ago, the State Department of Transportation reconstructed a portion of State Highway 4 beginning at Alhambra Avenue in Martinez, and extending westerly to the intersection of Cummings Skyway in Franklin Canyon. In conjunction with this Freeway project, a portion of Barry Hill Road, near the Cuzmaings Skyway Interchange, was realigned and as a result of this realignment an existing portion of Barry Hill Road became a dead end stub street. (Continued on next page) ~ A G E N D A Public Works Department����� Page 2 of 7 February 3, 1976 1 1 1 1 I Item 4 Continued: ,In order to clarify the street name and the map records, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors set March 2, 1976 at 11:05 a.m. as the date and time for a public hearing to consider changing the naaee of a portion of Barry Hill Road to BARRY HILL COURT, beginning at the intersection of Barry Hill Road and extending easterly to its point of termination, a distance of 600 feet. (TO) Item 5. SUBDIVISION MS 33-73 - COMYLETION - Crockett Area The construction of sidewalks in Subdivision MS 33-73 has been satisfactorily completed. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Issue an Order stating that the work is complete. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to John G. Ivancich, P. O. Box 29, Challenge, CA 95925, $267.80 cash deposit as surety as evidenced by Auditor's Deposit Permit -Detail No. 111446 dated October 1, 1973. ' Subdivider: John G. Ivancich, P. O. Box 29, Challenge, CA 95925 Location. Sutcivision N.S 33-73 is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Clark Street and Alexander Avenue. (LD) Item 6. SUBDIVISION MS 137-74 - APPROVE AGRL'r-%UldT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve. the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision SLS 137-74. Owner: AFB Contractors, Inc., 261 Arthur Road, Martinez, CA 94553 Location: Subdivision MS 137-74 is located on the east side of Arthur Road opposite Anderson Vay.. (LD) Item 7. AID-TO-CITIES ALLOCATION - City of Martinez - Martinez Area The Martinez City Council, by Resolution No. 104-75, dated August 20, 1975, requested that the Board of Supervisors allocate $72,000 from City-County Thoroughfare Priority B Funds toward the construction of Alhambra Avenue from Paso Nogal southerly to the Pleasant Hill City Limits. At that time, only $69,000 was available to the City, and was so allocated by Board Order dated September 10, 1975. On January 13, 1976, the Board approved the rebudgeting of various City-County Thoroughfare funds, including an additional $3,000 to the Alaa=bra Avenue project. It is therefore recommended that an additional $3,000 allocation i for this project be approved. (LD) a x A G E N D A Public Works Departmen"15 Page 3 of 7 February 3, 1976 E i Item 8. HOWE ROAD - ACCEPT DEED - Martinez Area i It is reco==ended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed from O. L. Willis, et al., dated January 19, " 1976 for road purposes on Hoke Road. The Deed is a condition t of Land Use Permit 312-72. (RE: Work Order 4805, Road *3381) (RP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 9. SUBDIVISION 4508 - APPROVE PAP AND AGREEMENT Lafayette Area It is recoinended that the Board of Supervisors approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4508. Owner: Utah homes, Inc., and Lindsay Hames, Inc. Location: Subdivision 4508 is located westerly of Happy Valley Road approximately one-half mile west of Upper Happy Valley Road. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 10. ROCNDHILL DRIVE - TRAFFIC REGULATION - Alamo Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2181 be approved as follows: Pursuant to Section 21356 and 21803 of the California Vehicle Code, all vehicles traveling westerly on ROUNDHILL DRIVE (Road *4437V) , Alamo, are hereby required to yield the right of way to traffic on Roundhill Road. (TO) Item 11. KITTERY AFENUE - Award Contract - San Ramon Area Informal bids were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on Wednesday, January 28, 1976, for the removal and replacement of 166 lineal feet of curb, gutter, sidewalk, roadway section and two driveways to correct a ponding problem at =3091, *3095 and 113101 Kittery Avenue. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans and specifications, and award a contract to F. D. Marron Company, of Brentwood, in the amount of $3,423.00, the lowest of eight bids which were received. This project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class IC Categorical Exemption under the County Guidelines. It is also recommended that the Board of Supervisors concur in this finding. (RE: Project No. 5205-4297-75) (RD) 000N A_ G £ N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 7 February 3, 1976 l N Item 12. SUBDIVISION 4336 - APPROVE AGRMMENT - Danville Area It is reco=nnded that the Board of Supervisors approve the Road Acceptance Agreement for Silver Cloud Place Sub- division 4336. _ This Agreement provides for Silver Cloud Place to be retained as a model home area with construction to be completed at a later date. Owner: Kay Building Company, P. O. Box 1556, Burlingame, CA i 94010 Location: Subdivision 4336 is located on EI Capitan Drive i east of I-680. . (LD) # Item 13. SUBDIVISION MS 81-75 - ACCEPT INSTRUMENTS - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Accept the Relinquishment of Abutter's Rights, dated December 8, 1975, from Leadership Housing Systems, Inc., and Gordon H. Ball, Inc., dated December 8, 1975. 2. Accept the offer of Dedication for Drainage Purposes, dated December 8, 1975, from Leadership Housing Systems, ` Inc., for recording only. The documents satisfy'conditions of approval for Subdivision MS 81-75 by the Hoard of Adjustment. Location: The property involved in Subdivision MS 81-75 is located at the southeast corner of the Southern. Pacific Railroad and the proposed easterly extension of Crow Canyon Road, in the San Ramon Area. (RE: Assessor's Parcel No. 230-020-09 i 10) (LD) GENERAL Item 14. COUNTY COURTHOUSE REMMEL - CONSULTING SERVICES AGMUMENT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board Of Supervisors approve the Consulting Services Agreement with National Air Balance Company of San Francisco, Inc., for air balancing for the County Courthouse, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the Agreement. This Agreement will provide for air balancing on an as-earned basis to a maximum aunt of $2,400.00. This_ amount may not be exceeded without further authorization by the Public Works Director. (RE: Ulork Order 5313) a (B i G) 00017 A_ G E N D A Public works Department Page 5 of 7 February 3, 1976 a Item 15. BUCHANAN FIELD - APPROVE DEFERRED PAYMENT REQUEST - NAVAJO AVIATIOIT - Concord Area Navajo Aviation has requested 30 days extension to complete their semi-annual report and pay their percentage rental due on January 31, 1976. It is reco=--nded that an extension to February 29, 1976 be granted subject to interest at 1-1/2S per month as consideration for deferred payment. (A) Item 16. LEASED BUILDING, 2355 STANWELL CIRCLE - INSPECTION SERVICES - Concord Area It is recd—nded that the Board of Supervisors approve contracts for inspection services, effective February 3, 1976, for 2355 Stanwell Circle, a County-leased building to be occupied by the Health Department, with Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert Grady, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Agreements. - The Agreements provide for payment for those services in accordance with the standard rates as indicated in the Agreements. (106-7713-511) (B 6 G) Item 17. BUCHk%ULN FIELD - APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR MASTER PLAN STUDY- Concord Area On May 20, 1975, the Board of Supervisors authorized a Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport and on -- November 18, 1975, accepted a $30,000 planning grant offer from the FAA to be matched with $15,000 in County funds for the project. It is now recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute an Agree- went with Daniel, Vann, Johnson & Mendenhall of Redwood. City, California, to conduct a Master Plan Study for the development of Buchanan Field Airport. The study should be completed in twelve months. (RS: Work Order 5455) • (A) Item 18. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 15 - STATUS OF CLEAN WATER GRA%-Z APPLICATION ' On May 7, 1974, the Board of Supervisors authorized Victor W. Sauer, Engineer ex officio the Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15: (1) to file an Application for Clean Water Grant with the State Water Resources Control Board, and the Environmental Protection Agency for the design and construction of a sewage collection system and _related facilities for the District; and (2) to execute all documents relating to Federal and State grants. A Step II Grant Agreement of $359,850 has been offered to the District for the preparation of construction plans and speci- fications. The offer has been signed for acceptance by Mr. Sauer in accordance with the Board Order and returned to the Environ- mental Protection Agency. (continued on next page) 00018 u�f)�Q vs V V A G E N C Y Public Works Department j Page 6 of 7 February 3, 1976 imp I .,...... - i Item IS continued: The estimated construction cost of the project is $6.6 million. Total Federal and State Grants will amount to about $5.2 million. A local =atching share estimated to be about $1.2 million will be required. General Obligation Bonds have already been authorized to finance the local share. (No Board action required) (RE: Work Order 5400) (EC) e Item 19. CONTRA COSTA COMM WATER AGENCY The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board` of Supervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. (EC) - 4; t 1: F F NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interestea citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a leter specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. ;:: �z AGENDA e Page0 7 Public Works Department 7 February 3, 1976 . (M-1 Q E i i ' F f r J I 4r � f ah Contracts, Agreements, or other documents.. approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with,the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents . ' . prior to the time when the minutes stere. micro— . T' filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file [to be microfilmed, at a later time).. i p j In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 19 71 In the Maher of Proceedings of the Board during the month of January, 1976. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the reading of the minutes of proceedings of the Board for the month of January, 1976 is waived, and said minutes of proceedings are approved as written. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesokL Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 r y J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By / Deputy Clerk Ro -bie 6ut'errez 0 021 "24 am IOU In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 19 76 In the Molter of Affidavits of Publication of Ordinances. This Board having heretofore adopted Ordinances Has. 75-52, 75-53, 76-15, 76-19 ' and Affidavits of Publication of each of said ordinances having been filed with the Clerk; and it appearing from said affidavits that said ordinances were duly and regularly published for the time and in the manner required by law; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said ordinances are hereby declared duly published. The foregoing order was passed by unanimous vote of the members present. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order extend on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Wilmer my band and the Sed of the Board of 3rd &w of February • 19 76 L R. OL.SWN,- dark • • By Deputy Clerk .i+ 44 12M - IS-M Robbie Gutierrez -Form #30 4/7/75 00 022 Y. k k k s...r In the Board .sof Supervisors of Conte Costa County,- State of California February 3- - - rig 76 in the Mattw of - Ordinance(s) Introduced. - Me following ordinance(s) which amend(s) the Crdinance _ Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been. introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present viaives -gull reading thereof and fixes February 10, 1976 as the time for adoption of same: Section.32-2.622 is amended to add another exempt clerk position to the other positions in County Service Area R-6 Wrinda Recreation) alr6ady exempted from civil service. _ PASSED by the Board on February 1, 1976 _ I hereby certify that the foregalms is o true and coffee copy of on order entered an the miou:es of said Board of Supe tsars on :he date aforesaid. Vltness my hand and the Seal of the Board o: Supervisors cfftxed this 3ra day of February J. R. OLSSON. Clerk r1V (.;/�'' /? Deputy Clerk H ss 12174 =ossa Bonnie Boaz 00023 A T a$ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMITIr, CALIFORIIIA Re: Zoning Ordinances Introduced Date: February 3 1976 The Board having held hearing on the Planning Commission's recommendation(s) on the following rezoning application( s) , and directed preparation of the following ordinance(s) to effect same; This (these) ordinance(s) was (were) introduced today, the Board by unanimous vote waiving the full reading thereof and setting February 10, 1976 for Board consideration of passing same: Ordinance Application Number Applicant Number Area 76-16 John S. Weightman 1914-RZ- San Ramon 76-17 Planning Commission 1968-RZ Alamo initiated 76-18 Planning Commission 1972-wRZ Orinda ' initiated PASSED on February 3. 7976 by the following vote: ATM: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: Mone. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I HEFMY CEF.TI-n that Vne foregoing is a true and correct record and copy of action duly taken by this Board .on the above date_ AT'T'EST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board: on February 3, 1976 By: -41 cOti 4L' � ` J . Deputy Robbie uO a rret 0002l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , i9: 76 In the Matter of Ordinance Introduced. The following ordinance which amends the Ordinance Code: of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes February 10, 1976 as the time for adoption of same: Ordinance No. 76-21 amending Section 32-2.606 to exempt from the Civil Service System the positions of Chief Assistant County Administrator and Assistant County Administrator (Finance). PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forelp ft Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesokL Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February . 197 /, J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey a , Deputy.Clerk Craie� H 24 W75 10M MIN r - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California rebruary 3 , iq 76 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. This being the data fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearings) held; The Board MIMS that said ordinance(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law.- Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 76-20 Amends Section 36-6.603 to Concord Transcript provide vacation reimburse- ment for management employees subject to certain conditions. pASSED on February► 3, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NOES ABSENT J. P. Kenny (X ) ( ) ( ) A. X. Dias (X ) ( ) J. E. Moriarty (X ) W. N. Boggess E. A. binscheid fx 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February i4 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. 4zL;- Deputy Clerk H za 12f'14 -'1s ui Jeanne O. Hag o 0002 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COWRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Zoning Ordinances Passed Date: February 3, 1976 This being the date fixed to consider adoption of the following ordinance(s) rezoning property as indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board orders that this (these) ordinance(s) is (are) passed, and the Clerk shall have it (them) published as indicated below: Ordinance Application Number Applicant Number Area Newspaver 76-1 A.F.B. Contrac- 1948-RZ Martinez Morning-News tors Gazette 76-2 Jorsco Real 1961-RZ E1 Sobrante El Sobrante Estate Dev. Co. Herald Bee 76-3 Planning 1963-RZ Antioch Antioch Commission Ledger 76-4 Planning 1964-RZ San Ramon Valley Pioneer Commission 76-5 Planning 1951-RZ Mt. Diablo Valley Pioneer Commission PASSED on February 3, 1976 by the following vote: ,AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny NOES: ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess I IREREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct record and cony of action duly taken by this Board on the above date. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board: on February 3. 1976 By:-O-t,-A'` ^—� 0 � Deputy ✓ Jeanne 0. Magli JUt�27 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19, 76 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS Br THE BOARD ORDMW that the personnel adjustments attached hereto- and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Hoard on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk 14 24 124 - 15-U Dorot MacDonald f POSITION ADJ USTMENT REQUEST No: Department County Counsel Budget Unit 030 Date 6/6/74 Action Requested: Reclassify a Sunervisi n Clerk .l_.ta iURft=Ci5j= -rr- (Legal, office Manager) Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed_This position requires administrative and salary upgrading to recognize the response i i ies and importance ot the post ion and to properly relate it to other comparable positions in the county. Cj'....eA C L:=a.A C C'.:ti Estimated cos"f adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries ao wagge�s- -• 2. Fixed �Nsef$: (T A: kms and coet) Estimated total Signature 9egartffent Hdad Initia"etd trr +inttion of County Administrator Date: .Tune 1k- 1974, To C;;2_'1 SBrvmce: P.,egLqAt telessification recommendation. L-= Cou_nty AdmiWstrator Personki 0t,tf•cenand/or Civil Service Commission D e: January 27, 1976 Classifkatrcn and Pay Recommendation ` Reclasstfy l_'Sup;;rvising Clerk I to Office Manager I, Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Office= Manager I. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Supervising Clerk I, position #01, Salary Level 296 (909-1104) to 0;ficer Manager I, Salary Level 346 (1058-1286). Assistant personnel DWector Recommendation of County Administrator //late: February, 4 , 1976 Reclassify Supervising Clerk I, position #1, Salary Level 296 (909-1104) to Office Manager I, Salary Level 346 (1058-1286) , effective February 4, 1976. c .� County dministrator Action of the Board of Supervisors FEB 3 i_-i Adjustment APPROVED j on J, 20 ON Clerk FEB 31976 Late: Sy:1! -4;._ / defJvty perk APPROVAL c; this adjus*yient eon6ti,tutes ait AW.op4i.ati.on Adjustment and Pev sonnee VVViltl �7 kCscZu.rZen A►rendr.+e,+tt. i/ POSITION ADJ UST-M(.EftJ-, FUEST No: �l�117 Department ' Social Service alig4t d9A -19�Date October 7, 1975 �vjrf. Action Requested: Reclassify (1) Adminis#?�iti1ge rvices Assistant II position #509-02 to Administrative Services Assistant III. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify the incumbent (Don Cruze) according to the duties performed. - - Estimated cost of adjustment: _ _ Amount: 1. Salaries and wages: $ 592. 2. m=ixed Assets: (Lia.t iter-6 and cost) , A;.r'. _ Estimated total-,,, 592. Signature Department ea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: January 6. 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County A m strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27, 197 6 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Administrative Services Assistant II to Administrative Services Assistant III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The. above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of administrative Services Assistant II, position #02, Salary Level 392 (1218-1480) to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 456 (148Q-1799). A � A ersonnel .Director Recommendation of County Administrator /Date: F b Lary 4.. 1976 Reclassify Administrative Services Assistant II, position 1702, Salary Level 392 (1218-1480) to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 456 (1480-1799) , effective February 4, 1976. Co my Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors _ '- Adjust„ nt APPROVED ) an rib 3:.b J. R. OLSSON, County .`Clerk RB 3 '^ Oate: BY:C A44 �putY Chrk t� APPROVAL c6 th.is adjustrreja cars;itutes azA,ppAop i.ation Adjms.tmea and Pehsonnet oi)00 R�:sa.Ct.,ti.or Am�tdm2:.t. i L POS IT I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Pio: Department Civil Service Budget Unit 035 Date 1/22/76 I Action Requested: Establish class Administrative Services Officer I: revise and rarittP Administrative Services Officer to Administrative Services officer II Proposed effective date: AS p Explain why adjustment is needed: To restructure the administrative servIcen clagn gpries, rstimate(!:jos5)f 1--djustment: Con� Costa County amount: P 1 . S ria ad wages: RECEIVED S 2. Ft d A-zeig (Zis"t items and cost) 976 _ tn f N _J Estimated to6squnty A.dw.inis ,d'.,r $ Signature Departrme t ea Initial Determination of County Administrator ate: January 23, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. ount rn strator , Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Comaission Date: January 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate class Administrative Services Officer I. Reallocate class and all positions of Administrative Servicer Officer to Administrative Services Officer II. On January 27, 1976, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Administrative Services I and recommended Salary Level 488 (1632-1983). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 and 71/17 to reflect the addition of Administrative Services Officer I, Salary Level 488 (1632-1983) and the re- titling and reallocation of Administrative Services Officer to Administrative Services " Officer II, both at Salary Level 519 (1794-2180). Can be effective day following Board action. The above class is exempt from overtime. AssistantPersonnel D' " ctor Recommendation of County Administrator ;dte: February 4, 1976 Add to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Administrative Services Officer I, Salary Level 488 (1632-1983) , and retitle and reallocate Administrative Services Officer to Administrative Services Officer II, both at Salary Level 519 (1794-2180) , effective February 4, 1976. �p *,/Vl �L4-%0&= Ok County Adm:nitstrator Action of the Board of Supervisors FEB 31976 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk .. '13-'s Hate: ;� v$? — By:;/��,:l�o. oPuly, Cl.,,k APPROVAL # 4; 5 adjus.tow-nt eorstitutes an Appitopma- .e tion Adjustment and Pe-uonnee 00031 Reso.iut�.o:s ;.+�v.dmu�.t. " mill 111111 c POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: O� Department Civil Service Budget Unit 582 Date 1-23-76 Action Requested: Cancel Administrative Analyst-Proiect position #582-949-03: add one M Driver Clerk-Proiect position. Proposed effective date: 2-04-76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To implement an action required by the Oct_ 3, 1975 memo- randum from the County Administrator to the Director of Personnel on reassignment of CETA personnel . Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Cos►o Ccwnty Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: REECEIVE-9 2. Fixed Assets: (tint iters and coet) r i976 Gr;ice of $ •� w Estimated totalCounty - or S Signature _ ,- I ~� Department/Hea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27. 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify I Driver Clerk - Project and cancel 1 administrative Analyst-Project. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as a Driver Clerk - Project. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the additi6h 6f 1 Driver Clerk - Project, Salary Level 247 (783-951) and the cancellation of Administrative Analyst - Project position 003, Salary Level 320 (978-1188). t Pers nne4 Director Recommendation of County Administrator Cate: February 4, 1976 Add one (1) Driver Clerk - Project, Salary Level 247 (783-951) and cancel Administrative Analyst - Project position #03, Salary Level 320 (978-1188) , effective February 4, 1976. Vvem,Men d2a= County Ad.;►:nstrator } Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on FEB i J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk I Date: Ff$ 3 iQ'3 - By: '•Ncu� / Pe Pty Clerfc ` APPROVAL oD t1Li,s adju.strtnt Cof;stitwtes an AWt0Pt-..iati.0►1 ,A,djwstrertt and Pe&6annet 00000 V POSITION ADJUSTMENT R QUEST Ito: 9O� ! PCEIVED Department CCCO. Medical Services BU etgnif 6 Date 12/23/75 Action Requested: Cancel Intermediate &s u4P ErpEpro9l-05; Add Medical Transcriber Position Proposed effective date: l/l/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To correctly reflect the duties of this position Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: S 2. Fixed Assets: (tint i ter.6 and coat) iJUMAN Estimated total _ , _ , ;D%�Rnevy Dofe/2��3� ��� Signature WLlliam R. , chi. f, Med.Admin.Svcs. Department ea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: January 6, 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. to-unty AdmthiStylator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Medical Transcriber and cancel 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Medical Transcriber. Can be effective day following Beard action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Medical Transcriber and the cancellation of 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk, position 009, both at Salary Level 206 (691--839). Assistant ersonnel - irector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: February 4. 1976 Add one (1) Medical Transcriber, and cancel one (1) Intermediate Typist Clerk, position #09, both at Salary Level 206, (691-839) , effective February 4, 1976. 4e1 County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on r--t: Z �zt:I FEB � 1��� gjjYR. SON. Coun � t Hate: = 1s'.t� - -liar ,or Deputy APPROVAL e�6 tt2,i,3 c �djmstm .C,Lt cC115#,itLt•+'.?.a an Appcepniation Adjua rrent and PeA6onnet t7� R'" ctut on AlffP.�ILilxnt- t hnTF- Tnn cpr-+,..^ 'nd reverse side of form mut be completed and supplemented, when I And rpverse slue ui ,ul POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: CO,;2 Department Probation Budget Unit 3aB Date 1/2/76 Action Requested: Establish one (1) Deputy Probation Officer 11 position. This position to _ be cancelled upon return of J. Craig from Leave of Absend2roposed effective date: 1/12/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To fill vacancy created by employee on Leave of Absence with a D.P.O. It Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Cosa county Amount: 1 . Sa a ier aaand ragges: RECEI ED 2. Fixg A4tso {Leat .items and cost) _ n - 2 1976 Office f" Estimated total County A�'mitzi,tr�a;, $ > Signaturezi _ it epaetinent Heifd Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: January 13k 1976 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. To—unty Adffintstrator z Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27, 197L Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Deputy Probation Officer II. Deputy Probation Officer II position is being established to replace an employee in the class of Senior Deputy Probation Officer while on leave of absence. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Deputy Probation Officer II, Salary Level 379 (1170-1423). AssistantPersonnel Divector Recommendation of County Administrator �te: February 4, 1976 Add one (1) Deputy Probation Officer II, Salary Level 379 (1170-1423) , effective February 4, 1976. Y. Smct4n 41 County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors FEE 3 jy�S Adjustment APPROVED } on OLSSO',, County Clerk Date: By: ePut! C:erk APPROVAL o6 this adju b.vAt eorati,tmtea an Appnop4iat ion Adjustment and Peuonnee Pcdo&ti.on Ame zdme��t. H`�"" POW— h r V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Public Works Department Budget Unit 062 Date 1-13-76 .4ct'on Requested. Cancel one Engineering Technician II position. Add one Apprentice Add one (1) Deputy Probation Officer II, Salary Level jI9 (1170-1423) , effective February 4, 1976. Y. S�ct/yn q1 County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors FEE 3 Adjustment APPROVED { } on R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: 1: $ 3 i�'o— By: �[ !/. ,%O /i ePut! C:efk APPROVAL of t1ua adju stmt eorstitutes an Apprtoptiatiort Adjustnent and Peuonnet Pcao&ti,.on Amo:dm2nt. �P u h r POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Public Works Department Budget Unit 062 Date 1-13-76 � .4ct;on Request-.,- Cancel one Engineering Technician II position. Add one Apprentice Mechanic position. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: See attached memorandum j Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: Contra Costa CO 139.00 . 2. Fixed Assets: (last .items and cost) ��my i t CL .r =�' •� 139.00 Estimated total 0t;,C P9 of C , z Signature ' 'rQio Department_ ea 1 Initial :Deternaf5on of County Administrator Dat 26�tTl> ell irk. , �..-.,. r'1�� •, �Tti �-�� Co-unty Administrator Personne Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27, 2976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Apprentice Mechanic and cancel 1 Engineering Technician II. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Apprentice Mechanic. Can be effective day following Board action, The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Apprentice Mechanic, Salary Level 303t (1023-1128) and the cancellation of 1 Engineering Technician II, position #03, Salary Level 287 (884-1075). Personnel Di-rector Recommendation of County Administrator / ate: Februarv4. 1976 Add one (1) Apprentice Mechanic, Salary Level 303t (1023-1128) , and cancel one (1) Engineering Technician II, position #03, Salary Level 287 (884-1075) , effective February 4, 1976. f County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Ft:. Adjustment APPROVED ) on 3. OlSSC)N - 4ii County Cleric Date: :F.: 31976 By: zl- /l'or Deputy Cterk Ai"PR'OVAL o6 t::i.s adjustmej:t ccnat Lutea an Apptop.1tti ctc"olt Adjustment and P¢/caonnee a 0003 ! NOTE: Too section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when f____ POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Sheriff—Coroner Budget Unit 359 Date 12-16-75 Action Requested- Civil Service staff to study and update the specification for Coroner's Aide Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: :xisting job specification does not adequately cover /all duties and responsibilities of the classification. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: C-25'M County 1 . Salaries and wages: ;;rLEI1fS 2. Fixed Assets: (fit Ztm and cam) u� ;e of Estimated totalzumaty ra--Jm-k-f,-t,�r,.'j' per-- Signature Departments __ cF 1,E sHXPA F-C1ZR Hx-Jt ni ial, a emination of County Administrator Date: December 22, 1.975 o �ivi.iervice: Request recommendation. Count strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 27. 1976 ` Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Senior Coroner's Aide. On January 27, 1976, the Civil Service Cocssission created the class of S6nioi,'Coroner's Aide and recommended Salary Level 272 (845-1027). Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Senior Coroner's Aide, Salary Level 272 (845-1027). This,class is not exempt from overtime. Assistant Personnel;/Di rector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: February 4, 1976 Add to Basic Salary Schedule the class of Senior Coroner's Aide, Salary Level 272 (845-1027) , effective February 4, 1976_ _ �D County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors CVh 3 1376 Adjustment APPROVED ) on Date: FEB ^ Y.R/OjI�SSON. C�r�erk Date: V t�l� B �//�-/!rr? � /J./ /� Dep6ny Clerk APPROVAL. oD this adjus mv!t coitatituteA an Appitoprc.�on Adjustment and PvL6onnve�)�}Vi3� Re aotu ti on Ame,:dment. TE: and reverse side of form rtub.t be completed and supplemented when w i I i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Salary Level 272 ($45—tuai) . CountyLAcOnistrator - 3 1976 Action of the pR0VE0 f Suter) on `� Adjustment AP J. 5L- - . C rSONlerk By:3 �3iJ ' �kPt:sy Clerk Date: co,,S# .itut" an Appwp,&n on Adfu4tmerct and pe�caonn� 91 AptROVAL o$ thiA ad1u"me-t J ResO&tion Amok - - nd reverse side of form mud# be completed and supplemented when TE _. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 19 76 in the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE HOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the .Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By _� Deputy Clerk H 24 12"4 - 15-M DOrot MacDonald IU K27 00 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY D ` APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 255 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Catd Special Fund Decrease ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Code Quontit ) Budget Ua4t Object & .Acct. (CR X IN 66) 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies $500.00 255-2479 Other Special,,,,9pt. Expense $500.00 990-9970 New Appropria&fie Revenue $500.00 PROOF La_^'?•__ _K_P_ �`Eit•_ s- EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY This adjustment will place the gift of $500 Date iksct,pr�on from the U. S. Treasury Department into Cost Center 255 in order to fulfill the objectives of the gift. ` ecc�'ilU& 7 O! J G/n oAt S APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE o n X AUDITOR- i rn CONTROL LF_ I R- �1L-Lr �� � ` .':.il. ,�1 c` A e r: M. Fn COUNTY J n t f ., tT• < ADMINISTRATOR: 1 A- rr'..c. t—' BOARD OF SUPER YISe gS ORQ�R- YES: 8apervtsors bennj, I11as. X:er;�r2;, �t FEB 81976 00038 NO% an p A Ir A. GLENN.ADMIN. SERVICES OFFICEp JR. . OLSSON �, F Ir.E OF THE SHLRIFF-CORONER/e Jv7r CLERK 6y $ignarure TitleDate aef{C Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2,'66) Journal No. ' Sre instructions on Ret erse Side mv :.�..�,. e s SCONTRA COSTA COUNTY —T))!.i � APPRDPWATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 300 Increase RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Decrease (CR X IN 66) ACCOUNT 2. DEJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Cord Special Fund Code Quantit 1 BudaetUnit 0 ect b.Acct. $500.00 LaC22G'.a t7,i 1.22 iJi4..i LV LujiliJ. Of the gift. APPROVED: res . eems/ c/ StGNaTURES DATE ' s AUDITOR_ �6y7�colO�c 5 -40 0 CONTROL .ER: Ott; 3 I COUNTY r izl c ADAIINIS7'RATOR: oc- m_ BOARD OF SUPE VIS E� $5 ORp�R. ft"l YES: , i7la� aic�rsrtr, cam'.,..` C7 'W �► t�NO:. FEB 31976 00038 Jr R. OLSSON on 1 CLERK b>� ,B � L-A. GLENN.ADMIN. SERVICES OFFICER F ICE OF THE SHERIFF-CORONER ( M 129 Rev. 2,'66) a� Si9noture Title `/� AGprcp. ;- Dare Sir lnsOactiotts orr Reterse side Journal No. x iCOMM CTA COWTY r APPROMATION ADJUSTMENT I. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT 300 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROL.LEWS USE Cord Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECTDecrease OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Codc Quantity1 Budoetunit Object Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) C)� /4!�VLn3 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies $500.00 300-7750 1 5 Disc Harrow ��}}�� $500.00 990-9970 New Appropria ve ei�ee" $500.00 PROOF Comp._ - K.P. VER• :. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(tf capital outlay,list items and cost of each) TOTAL - - ENTRY This adjustment will place the revenue from Date Des-.riptian the sale of surplus hay in Cost Center 300. The purchase of a disc harrow will enable the Rehabilitation Center to continue to produce hay crops. Please refer to attached correspondence and Board Order. APPROVED: SIGNATURES LATE ,l�F(,' "/.rG't� 4z "-o` "UK-1ak-eq AUDITOR -' 7LIJ 31 v t=I CONTROLLER. = *^ :r COUNTY z w ,Z17' ADMINISTRATOR: J CTl BOARD OF R +1SOCr ?'ti RS ORDER: u YES: t Re=3'. Diss, `hurt: ty, )fir. LI=Cheid. Boggess1976 _ FEn 3 NO% en � L A. GLENN. ADMIN-'SE"IdE's DFFICER R. OLSSON �'1 ��,,�.• ` ornee of TNc iiHeRtFF•eaaaNele �3� 7Qt. CLERK brpa J. ry at' $+gsran rc � Title (� Dare Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. tib&) - Journal No. See Instructions in Ree erse Side ;e •' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPR1A7tt1N ADIUSTmENT I eFPARTtaENT GR BUDGEt UNIT COUNTY LIBRARY RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Increase Decrease CR X IN 6b1 Code Quantic l Fund BudoetUnit Obiect Sut.Acct. 01 1206 620-7751 012 Paperback Unit $ 11 01 1206 520-7751 004 Microfilm File $ 43 01 1206 991-9970 Reserve for continguencies $ 54 't G( ! C Qq! PROOF EXPLANATION OF REQUEST f If capita!OWO Y,list items and cast of each) TOTAL ENTRY Late D;=ct,gt,en To provide additional funds for purchase of 2 capital outlay items for Pittsburg Branch Library due to cost increases of vendors. Cost of both items will be reimbursed to the library fund from the Davi Fund (#8113) by journal at end of fiscal year. APPROVED: SIGMA S VAT£ —To�--/�yveu t; AUDITOR'='�" .>' � �.'t� .a. �'1" l 11 CONTROLLER: ,& COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: � BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES. akupok" Remy*, Dlst,. laatiarty, MGPW LAnschebL Sogges FEB 3 19176 ( 00Af) y Admin. Assistant 1/23/76 J. R. a.ssoN, CLERK bDate �� L� " :�taxure � Title Date t11)t QCPtC App,7 Adj. 1ot:mat No. (M 129 RFV. 2/75) Irr.drac hoAvs ore Rer erre Side dila CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPRDPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub I is Work s RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2_ OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantic ) Fund Bud etunit Ob ect Sub.Acct_ (CR X IN 66) SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION 01 1003 661-7600 993 1. Set Rd RW Dedi i5,000 528 3. Livorn a Rd 15,000 528 3. j f RW 30000 295 5. Valley View Rd 121 271 4. Hillcrest Rd 1,995 992 6. Set Rd RW Misc. 1,000 506 7. Bailey Rd RW 316 302 8. Camino Pablo RW 3, 187 580 4. Byron Hwy 70 536 9. Pvmt markers 500 348 6. Treat Blvd 303 346 5. Canyon Rd 300 535 5. Bethel Island Rd 2,498 518 5. Willow Pass Rd 21,652 584 5. Diablo Rd 860 548 5. Sycamore Valley Rd 5,061 591 5. San Ramon Vly Rd 12,708 285 6. San Pablo Dam Rd 307- 322 02322 6. Tice Vly Blvd 4 987 Slide Repair 1,689 Design 995 VI NGR ROAD CONSTRUCTION ION 4 ,722 665-7600 993 1. Minor Rd RW Dedi 4,900 550 2. Bishop Ranch AD RW 2,365 992 6. Mina- Rd RW Misc 500 364 5. Flora Ave 888 109 5. Grove Ave 10,152 995 Design Engineering 3.275 PROOF Co Ii.P. VER. 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(IF capital outlay, list items ondUt(t o�ea.h) "�'- TOTAL _� 1. W.O. 4804, 4805 Right of Way dedication engineering ENTRY for FY 1975-76. Dote Description 2. M.O. 4228 Additional to complete RW Eng as County obligation on San Ramon A.D. 1973-3. 3. W.O. 4257 Preliminary and Right of Way Engineering to reconstruct - 1680 to Trotter Way. 4. W.O. 5817, 4207, 4289, 4165, 4158, 4278, 4275, 4206, 4247 Transfer funds on completed work orders. 5. W.O. 4241, 5839, 4240 Cover expenditures on completed APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE work orders. AUDITOR-,_�-- ^� ( L 6. W.O. 4586, 4587 Acquire miscellaneous right of way CONTROLLER: ' various roads. COUNTY �� 7. W.O. 4537 Acquire RW on completed construction project ADMINISTRATOR. 3; miles east of Clayton Rd. 8. W.O. 4508 Right of Way services to sell excess BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORO�� property at Orinda Village Shopping Center. YES: � Kenny. S.°rte"' 9. W.0 4180 Preliminary Engineering to I nsta 1 l pavement y,Wr, Lln�cheld mar ers on various county roads. NO:. "gess a. �7 b 4U 41 J. R. OLSSON CLERK6ZZru�Ljubl i c Works D i rector 1/18/76 ?1 UWAX G� ApproTitle Dote �sC".L Journal ( M 129 Rev. 2/681 Journal No. Ser lestrmctious on Reverse Side ,v I .. CONTRA COSTA couNn APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENY OR BUDGET UNIT Pub I is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Fund Decrease Code Ouantit ) BudaetUn4t Object b.Acct. t CR X IN 66) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7A 01 2365 2365-7712 008 1. Outfall-Bypass fm 001 5,000 s 001 1. Plant expansion to 008 5,000 EQUIPMENT OPERATIONS 1003 063-7753 039 2. Water tank trucks 1,016 701 2. Sedan Compact 11*016 PROOF Co_mp_.—_ _K_P!_ _VER.— 3_ EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY I. W.O. 5437 To cover engineering charges for construc- Date Destupt.on tion of sewer pipe bypass. 2. Additional required to complete modification to water tank trucks. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— !i\'► <31eQ1A12171 CONTROLLER: COUNTY ' ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 89jordam Bend). Mis. Aiurtartl, fr D"Mu4 uu�chela j W, N. Boggess OM;42- NO:. ar /t J soN A � ;�ub I ic Works Olrector 1/28/76 s,gnatur Titir Data &P.Cgy cerk i Approp.Adi. M 129 Rev. 2 o&? Journal No. ' 11 tee Instructions on Rererse Side 4 TN Tir BOARD OF SUPERVISORS f OF CONTRA COSTA COUNtf, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/91 ) Wi�E E:4S, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by Cou6nty Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from ;rapers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been Assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation z Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected as stated below. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error, should be canceled as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the , delinquency date, upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record. On parcel No. 150-131-009-6, Tax Rate Area 12060, ZIMMER, CARLENE D. was not allowed the homeowner's exemption due to clerical error. The exemption should be allowed in the amount of $1,750. On Boat No. CF 98114 FF, Tax Rate Area 05001, Bill No. 023k, GRU?1DY, THOM-AS A. was not allowed the veteran's exemption due to clerical error. The exemption should be allowed ;n the amount of $150. FURTHER, it has been ascertained from papers in the Assessor's Office that pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 275(c), claimants for the homaowner's property tax exemption who filed a claim subsequent to April 15, 1975, and whom the Assessor has ascertained to be eligible should be allowed $1,400 or 80,E of the assessed value: Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Agsessee 218-241-012-2 -66031 0�? JACKSON, Robert D. & Patricia 538-070-027-7 08011 $1400 WILLIANS, Millie T. & Ethell I hereby consent to the above • changes and/or corrections: JOHN B. CLAUS--:i, County Counsel yssesso_r ti 1-23-76 cJ By Copy to: Assessor ( odger:;) Deputy �J lax Colleczor PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1476. Gage 1 of 1 RESOLUTION UO. 76/91 o0043 i BM OF SUPERVISORS OF COUTRA COSTA COM T . CALIF-WL4 Re: Cancel Delinquent Penalty on ) First Installment on 1975-76 ) RESC UT111 U0. 76/92 Secured Assessment Roll. ) TAX CCLT::.0 7 R'S I'M 10: 1. Parcel No. 155-X93-035-6-00. Due to clerical error which resulted is failure to comply with a request for the applicable tax bi11, penalty-has attached to the first installment. Having received payment, I now request cancellation of the 6 delinquent penalty pursuant to Revinue and Taxation Code Section 4986(1)(b). Dated: Januarl 28, 1976 SDWAM W. LEAL3 Tax Collector I coaseat,to this cancellation. JOW B. CLOSM, County Counsel By--e,✓ . z Asst. B Deputy x-X-X-x-x-x-x-x-Xc x BOLRD'S OAD3% Pursuant to the above statute, and shoring that this penalty, at:ached because of clerical error, the Auditor is --ZR-M to CA.'IC:- the 6% delinquent penalty. PTSD aj February 3, 1976 , by unaUmous vote of Supervisors present. A?L:j cc: County Auditor C.unty Tax Collector ^ i aifi '� ?:f'. 7i/ 92 Wt�ll�� 4' BOAM OF SUI'?.i?tTISORS nc CMTRA COSTA COM TT, C4LIFrWIIA He: Cancel Delinquent Penalties ) on First Installments on ) RESMU Ti NO. 76/ 93 1975-76 Secured Assessment Roll. ) TAI Cc.I SCTORIS 1EMO: I have established by satisfactory proof that remittances to cover payments of the first installments of taxes on the below listed parcels were deposited in the United States mail, properlyr addressed with postage prepaid, but were not tinely received, resulting in delinquent ;penalties being charged thereto. Having received payments, I now request cancellation of the 6% delinquent penalties pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 2512. 028-080-023-5-00 02&081-032-7-00 028-08D-029-3-00 113-141-020-9-00 02a-080-030-1-00 515--090-019 -8-00 Parcel No. 248-110-014-3-00. Penalty has attached to the first installment due to clerical error in not applying paytre;nt to the applicable tax bill. Having received payment, I now request cancellation of the 6,F'.' delinquent penalty pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4986(1)(b). Dated: January 27, 1976 ED<IARD W. LVZ, Tax Collector I consent to these cancellations. JOM B. CL LUS^1, County Counsel By: E"- , Asst. By: Deputy Pu F X—]C—X—X—K— BOLMIS ORDER: Pursnt to the above stataztes, anal to the above satisfactory proof and shoring that these uncollected delinq=ent penalties attached because of error, the Auditor is to : :; them. p SSSD CU February 3, 1976 , by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. s t FL: R9 s cc: Co1L`lty Auditor LountZr Tax ;a lector 1 93 t f 6i MM M1" IN THE BOARD OF SUFFEW SORS � OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Natter of Cancellation of ) Tax Liens on Property Acquired ) RESOLUTION r . 76/94 by %blic Anncies ) tT&REAS, the County Auditor pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4986(b) reco=ends cancellation of a portion of the following tax liens on properties acquired by public agencies; said acquisitions having been verified and taxes prorated accordingly. NOW2 THERE-E ORE, BE IT RESOL9ED that pursuant to the above authority and recommendations, the County Auditor cancel these tax liens for year of 1974-75 1975-76 FOR YEAR 1974 75 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 167-1.30-008-1 66066 Por FOR YEAR 1975-76 ` CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 107-130-015-6 66066 A11 218-080-007-6 66088 Por EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 365-130-007-5 76004 Por PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. .H. DONALD FUNK, County Auditor-Controller (Tax Cancel- Order) (R&T S4986(b) ) County Auditor 1 County Tax Collector 2 Medem'Pti on} (Secured) RESOLUTION NO. 76/94 . 000416 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMA COSTA COMM, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RE: In the :latter of the Cancellation of ) Tax Liens On and Transfer to Unsecured ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/95 Roll of Property Acquired by Public ) —'— Agencies. ) (Rev. f Tax C. 94936(b) and 2921.S) - Auditor's demo: Pursuant to revenue and Taxation Code 49S6(b) and 2921.5, I recommend cancellation of a portion of the following tax liens and the transfer to the unsecured roil of the remainder of taxes verified and taxes prorated accordingly: I Consent U. DONALD FUNK. County Auditor-Controller JOWN B. CLNUSEN, County Counsel 14 By: eputy By: Deputy t The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the above authority and reco=endation, the County Auditor shall cancel a portion of these tax liens and transfer the remaining taxes to the 1976 - 77 unsecured roll. Tax Date of Transfer Remaining Rate Parcel Acquiring Allocation Amount taxes to be Area Mmber Agency of taxes to unsecured Cancelled io 7026 985-083-001-9 PITTSHM REDS rEW..F?%NT 7-1-75 to $205.2- 44:35� AGENCY (all) 1-15-76 7026 085-085-009-0 PITTSBURG REDEVEMPMW 7-1-75 to 5.19 56.04. AGENCY (all) 1-15-76 7026 085-085-Mh-0 PITTSBURG REtF.VMPYz:tT 7-1-75 to 2.35 23.67 AGENCY (all) _1-16-76 7026 085-086-006-5 PITTSBURG REJEWIA??EEENT 7-1-75 to 6.49 70.04 AGENCY (all) 1-15-76 7026 085-086-007-3 PITTSBURG Rr.DBTz'WP?M 7-1-75 to 3.24 35.03 AGCY (a11) 1-15-76 79151 135-062-001-7 CONS COSTA COUNTY 7-1-75 to 1,148.57 9,132.60 (all) 8-12-75 6007 401-162-003-8 CITY OF PINOLr 7-1-75 to 112.93 540.29 (all) 9-t:7S 11007 417-043-009-6 SAN PABL? REDEE M?.KENT 7-1-75 to 24-37 324.35 AGE MY (all) 1-13-76 PASSED x .,u)OPTED ON February 3, 1976 County Auditor 1 by u:::lnimuus vote of the County Tax Col ector 3 Supervisors Present (Secured) (P.ede-ration) (unsecured) ::2:5^!UTIO\ NO. 76/95 Ol,r ._ Vl� BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF -CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Correction to 1975-76 Tax Roll reflecting ) correction of assessments 2-9A and 2-98 ) in Assessment District, Pleasant dill ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/96 1966-S (City of Pleasant Hill 1915 Act ) Bond District) ) The Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Upon application of the County Auditor for correction of assessments 2-9A and 2-9B in Assessment District, Pleasant Hill 1966-S (City of Pleasant Hill 1915 Act Bond District), the Board of Supervisors finds as follows: 1. For the 1972-73 Tax Roll assessments 2-9A and 2-9B in the amount $373.90, were erroneously entered on Assessor's parcel number 154-130-029, assessed to Walter G. and Jeanette Ofdenkamp. Assessments 2-9A and 2-9B should have been entered on parcel 154-130-035, assessed to Frederick T. and Gloria Anderson. 2. For the 1973-74 Tax Roll assessments 2-9A and 2-9B in the amount $363.66, were erroneously entered on Assessor's parcel number IS4-130-029 assessed to Walter G. and Jeanette Ofdenlaimp. Assessments 2-9A and 2-9B should have been entered on parcel 154-130-03S, assessed to Frederick T. and Gloria Anderson. 3, For the 1974-7S Tax Roll, County Assessor's parcel numbers changed from 154-130-029 to 1S4-680-00S and from 1S4-130-03S to IS4-680-003 and 154-680-004. 4. For the 1974-7S Tax Roll assessments 2-9A and 2-9B in the amount $352.58, were erroneously entered on Assessor's parcel number 154-680-005, assessed to Walter G. and Jeanette Ofdenkamp. Assessments 2-9A and 2-9B should have been entered on parcels 1S4-680-003 and 1S4-680-004, assessed to Frederick T. and Gloria Anderson, c/o Richard H, & Yung-11i France. S. For the 1975-76 Tax Roll assessments 2-9A and 2-9B in the amount $341.52, were erroneously entered on Assessor's parcel number 154-680-00S, assessed to Walter G. and Jeanette Ofdenkamp. Assessments 2-9A and 2-9B should have been entered on parcels 154-680-003 and 154-680-004, assessed to Young-Hi France. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED THAT: 1. The Auditor is directed to correct the 1975-76 Tax Roll pursuant to Sections 4852 and 4834 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and to add the 1972-73 assessment of $373.90, 1973-74 assessment of $363.66 and 1974-7S assessment of $352.58 to parcels 1S4-680-003 and 1S4-6SO-004 which sas Assessor's parcel IS4-130-035 for the 1972-73 and 1973-74 Tax Roll. Page l of 2. RESOLUTION NO. 76/96 0048 i 2. Pursuant to Section 4836 of the Revenue and Taxation Code the assessee,; Young-11i, France, Rt. 2 Box 40A, Martinez, California 94SS3, has been notified, that he may request a hearing and present his objections. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. •I hereby nest the above action: 2 hereby consent to the above correction: JON.IV =Y CL MSEN, COUNTY COUNSEL 1Ile r U r Deputy H. DONALD FUNK COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER - S .A J'{ L i 1 cc: County Auditor Page, Z of 2.. County Tax Collector County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 76/96 000 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) Agreement for Public Improvements ) in Subdivision MS 137-74, ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/97 Martinez Area. ) WHEREAS the following document having been presented for Board approval this date: A subdivision agreement with AFB Contractors, Inc., subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said sub- division agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; " WHEREAS said document having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as� -;required--by-Title 9 of the County_Ordinance Code,-as-follows: _ _ Ta: 'Surety,Bonds.=(No..-2250-12-0423817C). issued by,'Employprs Mtitual.—Uability. Stith-AEa:Contractors- Inc,.as_pxiuoipal-;::•.: _ .. in the aunt of $9,500 for Faithful Performance-and $10,000 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132203, dated January 7, 1976) in the amount of $500, deposited by: AFB Contractors, Inc., 261 Arthur Road, Martinez, CA 94SS3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 3, 1976 by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors A. M. Dias, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny Noes: None Abstaining: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty Absent: Supervisor V. N. Boggess Originating Department: Public Work masa ..—9 aa.t.L us...a uy wi:e LoilowIng: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as� requured--by4itle 9 -o£ the County.-Ordinance Code,-asfollows:-- -• - . ,...: : -. _.. . tea: 'Surety>Bonds._(No.--2250-12-0423817C)- issued by Emp2oysrs fttual.Liabi.Iity. ----ti1 rarnae any-vf idissoasin,kithL:CQntzzctors, Iac�.as-griu�ipaY _. in the amount of $9,500 for Faithful Performance and $10,000 for Labor and Materials-, b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132203, dated January 7, 1976) in the amount of $500, deposited by: AFB Contractors, Inc., 261 Arthur Road, Martine=, CA 94553. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 3, 1976 by the following vote: Ayes: Supervisors A. M. Dias, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny Noes: None Abstaining: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty Absent: Supervisor N. N. Boggess Originating Department: Public forks cc: County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Subdivider - AFB Contractors, Inc., 261 Arthur Road, Martinez, CA 94553 RESOUMON NO. 76/97 00050 S r.,!V1 Sin., 1 �, 01) Su:rlivisio=t: MS 137-74 - • (B. Z P. Cede §11611-i7) 01) Su&;`vider: — - AFB Contractors, Inc. 1) kffectire Date: (AI) Completion Period: _„oq!p year Originating Department: Public Works cc: County Auditor-Controller public Works Director Tax. Collector's Office Director of Planning Subdivider - AFB Contractors, Inc., 261 Arthur Road, Martinez, CA 94553 gESOUMON IN0. 76/97 00050 r, a,Xi$s:y.t: s Y �3 �— (§I) Su'I'div:ision: MS 137-74 - (B. Z P. Cede §11611-12) 01) Subdivider: AFB Contractors, Inc. i} Effectire bate: (§1) Corq letion Period: giae year 04) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful perfo.•Mnce & -maintenance) $91500 2. (labor £ materials)$10,,000 1. PARTIES CtiiF. Effective on the above data, the County of Contra ::Data, California, hl e:einaftuer called "Counts••', and the atovenazcd Subdivider, rtutual?y.- prondse aid agree as iolio:*s concerning this subdivision_: 2. Subdivider shall constrl:ct, install and complete roast and street inurc tnents, tract drzinaga, str:t:t signs, fire hydrants, and all improvcment; as required by the Cour.ty nr':;_nancc Code, esi.2!ci2lly Title 9, and including future av�ena:ents, and all inprc.• a:,rs required in the approved improverent plan of this subeirision on file ir, the County's Puislic t'orks Department. Subdivider sh.11 cwplcte this work arm improvements (hereinafter called "Work") wit?lin the above co=pletion period I;rom date h,:reo:: as required by the California ` Subdil•iszon :Sap Act (Bi.siness &I ."rofessions Code §§11500 and following), in a good %-ork- ranlike mar:ier, in accordance with accentad construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made ther::under; and where there is a conflict between the improrement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stZ icter requi:-erents shall govern. 3. GU PAANTFE & �L4IXTIM CE. Subdivicder guarantees that the York is and will be free frc= defects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; sad he shall m<:intain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory per:crnwxe. i. Ifre...O' EatF.hI SEi u2IT2: DEPOSITFONDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subaivi3er shall, pursuant to Business $ Professions Code §11612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $S00 cash; and.... S. Roads, ecc.: Ll - faithful performance 4 maLstenance) additional securit}• for at least tl:e above-srecified amamutt, which is the total estimated cost of the vork less $500, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an accertablr coz•pa.zte surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agrcem:ant and ainttr:a:ac_ of the work for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against ary defectirc uo,• unship or materials or any ursatisfactory perfo=ance; Plus (2- labor raterials) another such additional security it -P 1 w.i LL-.L.LUL a, lt1C. 1) Effectire Elate: (§1) Completion Period: oje year (§4) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bor-ds, etc.) 1, (faithful performance F -maintenance) $9,500 2. (labor $ materials.)$10,000 1. P.A.RTIES MATE., E:fect_:re on the above dot., the County of Contra Costa, Califor.�ia, he:einalfter called "Counts•", and the aho.•ena"cd Subdivider, nutually_ pro :ise and agree as tollovs concerning this subdivision: 2. 1:3PROVE'•IENTS- Subdivider shall co::strlict, install and complete road and street inurc•:'enents, tract, drainag_-, sire t s'grt3, fire hidrants, and all i=prorcmcnts as required by the Courty Or"'inancc Code., esi._ci::21y Title 1, and including future a*:en(Lients, and all inprc.r�,enir5 required in the approved improverent plan of this sub;ivision. on file ir, the Cou:nty's Pu::3ic Vorks Depart:rert. Subdivider shall eo:,plete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "Work") within. the above co--pletion period -oa date h,:reo,: as required by the California ` Subeirision Map Act (Blusiness a Professions Code §§11500 and following), in a good tsork- manlike :,tamer,, in accordance With accented construction practices and in a man.-ter equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made themunder; and wherc there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirerents shall govern. 5. GUAPA_%TFE & MIN,EXXWE. Subdivider guarantees that the York is and will be free from defects and still perform satisfactorily in accordance Frith Article 94-4.4 of the County Ordinance Code; aad he shall cairrain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory per.crzat:ce. Y. III'':'.?:'DIE?►i SLCii;IIT�: DEPOSIT € FONDS. upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business $ Professions Code §1I612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $SC-0 cash; and.... E. Bo:ids, etc.: (1 - faithful performance € mai-ttenance) additia"ax security for at least the above-specified amo'-^.t, which is the total estirated cost of the ::ora: 2css $500, in the fora of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an accep tablr corporate s:=.rely bond, gum ranteeing his faithful performance of this agreem:ant and niair-tet:anc-_ of the work for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defectirc s►or nanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2- labor nateriais) another such additional security in at least the above-specified arount, whits i.s th'. full =.Ount- cf ss: estirated cost, securing payment to tate contractor, to his subcontrr"ctorS, and to ptrsrns renting equiFnept or furnishing labor or materials to then or to the Sub---ivid r. S. ii.M.VZTY. Subair;der warrants tlx.:. said improvement plan is adequate to acccnpl isii this work—a;7 pruniseo i;i Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's resolution t+: cczp)enzon for zhe sublivision, the improvement plan proves to be inadecuate in any respect, SzPjdIrIJ:-r shZI] rile changes necessary to accomplish the work as prorised. - 1 - Microfilmed with board order 1 12. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the final Map or Parcel Kip for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COMM Y SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) VICTOR 'it'. SAUER, L Public it'o ks Director 60hAl-oc4e�I—T . T & V d B .,,,- � �/ �tg B. - �.. Vrnon L. -C-116e. --(Designate official capacity-Yn the business) Chief Deputy Public Works Director Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment RECaMENDED FOR APPROVAL: form below; and 2) if a corporation, affix ,i corporate seal. By Assistant Pub l c .h rks jffireor (CORPORATE SEAL) r 1 } ` f } FORM APPROVED: JOILN B. CLAUSE.I. County Counsel ' By Deputy' �^ State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of Contra Costa ) ss. or Individual) Gn January 9 3.976 the persons) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is are known to me to be the individual(s) and officer(s) or partners) as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. -, oFF,c,AL scot. AUDREY L. IVERSEN _ +�?. "'01ARI f-e3UC CAc.T(Htra• (NOTAhI.ai. SEAL) CONTRA COSTA COUNTV Audrey L. I UrCcm ; &Pims Vanh 24, 1578 1`10-.ary Public for said County and State (Subdir. Agrmt. CCC Stu. f=orm) i LO-9 (Rev. 9/75) -3- Bond No. 2250-12-042381-C it pmyr_•iF:T SF.Cun ITY COND FOR =:=SDrt SUIUDI IS10'. AGr.EE'T". 11 L (faithful performance 6 maintenance, A:OD I a b o Fat4iaL) .9 . (Calif. Bus. 6 Prof, Code 311612 Ei Fla -9 1976 3. OBLIGATION. 0 (Prirtcinal) t, �= Su J. B IFncip:t�:A and trett') organized and exiltu:o under the laws of the state of ' "A to transact surety business in California, as Surety, here'} severa . in ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to the County of Contra Costa, California, to pay it: A. faithful rerfor-ance. B raintenance) Ninet -=five hundre - - - - --Dollars ($9,500.00 ) for itself or any city-assitnee under thebelow-cited subdivision contract, plus (B_ labor 6 materials) TPn f-hnieSane3 - - - - - - - - Dollars (S1Q 00_00) for the benefit of persons protected under Cal. Bus. b Prot. Code 311612. 2. RECITAL OF CO.�TRaCT. The Principal has contracted with the County to install and pay for street, drainage, an: other improver!ents in SIinor Subdivision =bcr AL 7,.74 as specified in the Minor Subdivision Agreement, and to complete said work within the time specified in the ylinor Subdivision Agreement for cocpletion, all in accordance with state and local laws and rulings thereunder in order to satisfy conditions for filing of the Parcel flap for said minor subdivision. 3. CONDITION. If the Principal faithfully pe-frorms all things required of him according toiFie terms and conditions of said eontrac: and icprove..ent plan and improvements agreed on by him and the County, then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall become null and void, except if he fully pays the contractors, subcontractors. and persons rcv..ting equipcent or furnishing labor or matt:rials to them for said work and improvement, and protects the premises from claims of st•th liens, then this obligation as to Section 1-(B) above shall beco=e null and void; otherwise this obligation retains in full force and effect. No alteration of said contract or any plans or specifications of said work agreed to by the Principal and the County shall relieve any Surety frost liability on this bond; and consent is hereby given to male such alterations without further notice to or consent k Surety; and the Surety hereby naives the provisions of Calif, Civil Code § 2819, and holds itself bound without regard to and independently of any action against Principal 0:erever taken, and agrees that if County sues on this bond, Surety will pay reasonable zctorrey fees fixed by court to be taxed as costs and included in the judgment. :Si51D A M SEALED on r mo Li ay- I T76 PR1r;CIPU SUNY - .Xm contractors,,__Inc. E glovers Mutual Lia- 'bil• r ny of Wisconsin By, State of California ) Clay,��s�E .`.T SY EWA-) ss Contra Costa . County of ) • On January 5, 2976 the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Surety and who is Lnown to cc to be the Attorneys)-in-Fact for this Corpo:atc Surety,`. personally appeared before me and ack-nouledged to eel that he/they signed the name of the Corporation as Surety and his/their otn names) as r is Attorneys)-in-Fact. (NOTARIAL SEAL) 1 Audrey L. IMezn f Kotary Public for said County and State . ' •-° ` y /\Dpi7�i✓� c,, sa3 t Microfilmed with board order I j EMPLOYERS M[ITUAL LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN [OWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESETS: That !site Employers Mutual Liabuty lusarrsaee Compony of Wnsoonsin,a corporation duty organized and"existing and"the laws of the State of 1Fiwansm,and laving ins principal office is the City of Wausau,County of 16tanthoa.- State of Wisconsin.has made.coesatuted and appointtd,and does by these presents make,constitute and appoint— CLAY Thson its true and hsful aua:m7- ,4=.with fist power and awbority hereby conferred in its manse.place and stead,to sem.uveal,a&–.Jlh 't*attd deliver an)and all b=ds undaukinp,.zecopu:aacts,or other written abligsuaos in the car,, thereof------------ and -----------and to bind the oorpoabon thereby as fully and to the sone extent as if such bonds were signed by the soled with the corporate ani of the corporation and dtdy attested by its seadary hereby ratifying and coa�atn Oil the said auomey{a-fats any do is the preaises. This power of attorney h panted pnesnont to the fallowtog resolution adopted by the hoard of Directors of said Company at a meeting duly called and held an the ISth day of May.1973.which resolution is still in effect: –RESOLVED.that the President and any Vice President—dative or appointive—of Employers Matsui Liability Insurance Company of Whoonsm be.and that each of them hereby a.authorial to execute powers of attorney qc bli iqg the attorney named in the plana power of attorney to execute on behalf of Employers Mutual Liability, Insumaxe Company of W-mono bonds,umhatstmg:and all contacts of xuetysl*,and that any secet asaisaaut secretary be,and that each or anem y of thbemby i*authorized to attest the execution of any such mo et of attorney,and to amach thereto the sal of Employers Mato l Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin. `FURTHER RESOLVED, that the signatures of such officers and the sed of Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Coapasy of Wisconsin may be affixed to any such power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto by fxrmile,and gay such power of attorney or certificate beams such bQvndTe signatures and ficsimr7e seal sball be valid and binding opus the Ecgfters Mutual Liability Insuzasce Company of Wisconsin when so alfund and in the future with respect to any bond,undertaking or ouatract of suretyship to whichit isattached' W WITNESS WHEREOF.Empk*m Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin has caused these presents to be Biped by the vice president and attested by its secretary.and its cotpocue seal to be hereto affixed this 14th day o(. Was' 19-15-- E'VPLOYERS TY INStfRA)CE COMPANY OF Wt5COK5114 By T. A. Mack spa.+ Vine President Attest: age Karl A"I t Secretary STATE OF SISM SIN ) )ss COUNTY OF MARATHON) On this 14th nay of MAY ,19 75 .before me personally rime T. A. Pack ,to me known.who being by me duly sworn,did depose and ay that be is a vitt president of the Employers Mutual Liability lmnance Company of Wisconsin,the corporation dansbed in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the sat of said corpoction:that the teal affixed to said instrument a such corporate seal and that it sea so affixed by oder of the Beard of Directors of said corporation and that be signed his name thereto by floe order. IN WITLESS WHEREOF.I have haeunto set say band and affixed my official sal the day and year blain first above ATitttn. N CY L. OELSE Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WISCONSIN Day Gsaiasioa Fsp[rr.Febtasry 74 I= CERTIFICATE STATE OF%%1SMXSI1N ) CITY OF WALSAU )ss COUNT!OF MARATHON) 1. the utderstped, vin surest,,---at of F.sr„nloyen Mutual Liability Insarx a Co tpany of Wisconsin. a Wisconsin corporation,do hereby ccrufy that the foregoing and atucbed power of attorney ter tartains ars Cali force and has not been tevoird:and fsatherc om resat the tesoto ioa of the Board of Directors set faith is the power of attorney is still inn farce. sad sealed m the City of titins lssradX"County.Sute of>< skis 3 I day of��� M_ vice President Miaofitmed with- 1rder , ouM i IN INE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the natter of Approval of the } Road Acceptance Agreement for ) Silver Cloud Place (Subdivision 4336) } RESOLUTION NO. 76/98 in Danville Area. ) } UNEREAS the following document having been presented for Board approval this date: A road acceptance agreement with Kay Building Company, subdivider of Subdivision 4336, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said road acceptance agreement within three years from the date of said agreement; XWEREAS said road acceptance agreement having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bonds (No. 554-40-44) issued by American Casualty Company with Ray Building Company as principal, in the amount of $6,500 for Faithful Performance, and $7,000 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132836, dated January 28, 1976), in the amount of $400, deposited by: Kaufman & Broad, Inc., 880 Hinckley Road, Burlingame, CA 94010. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said road acceptance agreement be and the same is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 3, 1976. _ Originating Department: Public Works cc: County Auditor-Controller Public forks Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Subdivider - Kay Building Company, 880 Hinckley Road, Burlingame, CA 94010 RESOLUTION NO. 76/98 00055 t x f t ." MAD ACCEPTANCE AGREE!-1E vim. SUBDII♦ISIO.i 4336 - MODEL AREA (Silver Cloud Place) 1. P3lRTIES. Effective on December 18, 1975 , the County of Contra Costa, a political s• ivision of the State of Calornia, hereiiiafter called "County," and Kay Building Compsny, hereinafter called ',Developer. " mutually promise and agree -as follows: Originating Department: Public Works cc: County Auditor-Controller Public forks Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Subdivider - Kay Building Company, $80 Hinckley Road., Burlingame, CA 94010 RESOLUTION NO. 76/98 O0OSJ �. ._ ROAD ACCEPT&NCE AGREEMENT SUBDIVISION 4336 - MODEL AREA (Silver Cloud Place) 1. PARTIES. Effective on December 18. 1975 , the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, ereirafter called "County," and Kay Building CompAny, hereinafter called "Developer," mutually promise and agree zs follows: 2. PURPOSE. This agreement is to amend and supplement the obligation in connection with the construction of Silver Cloud Place, as required in the Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4336, approved by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 1973. This supple- mentary agreement has been written so that the Developer may use Silver Cloud Place as a model home area before the street is accepted as a County Road. In all other respects the original agreement remains in full force and effect as to all work covered thereunder except the provisions for Silver Cloud Place covered in this agreement. 3. ROAD ACCEPTANCE. Developer shall construct, in accordance with County standards, Silver Cloud Place, as shown and dedicated for public use on the Map of Subdivision 4336, filed February 7, 1973, in Book 154 of !taps at page 13. This work shall be completed no later than 3 years from the date of this agreement. Upon completion of the Developer's work to the satisfaction of the Construction Division, Public Works Department, but not before one year after the date of this agreement, the County will accept Silver Cloud Place as a County road. 4. MAINTENANCE AND GUARANTEE. a) For the period prior to construction of the road to County standards and acceptance of Silver Cloud Place, as a County road, Developer shall maintain Silver Cloud Place, including plantings, as a model home area. Within 3 years from the date of this agreement, Developer shall remove said plantings pursuant to Section 8461 of the County Ordinance Code and shall construct Silver Cloud Place in accordance with County standards and the Improvement Plans for Subdivision 4336, prepared by MacKay and Soaps dated March, 1974, and reviewed by County. S. V-1PROVBT.N'T SECURITY: DEPOSIT $ BONDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Developer shall• aeposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 cash, together with B. Bonds, etc.: (1 - faithful performance and maintenance) additional security 3 in the amount of $6,500, which is the total estimated cost of the work less $500, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agreement and maintenance of the work for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2 - labor and materials) another such s additional security in the amount of $7,000, which is the full amount of said estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment } or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Developer. 6. INSPECTION FEE. Developer shall pay to the County a cash amount equal to five percent (5$) of the estimated cost of the improvements for the inspection of the work and the checking and testing of the materials. Full credit shall be given for inspection fees previously paid for the construction of Silver Cloud Place, based on the unit prices used on the approved cost estimate for Subdivision 4336. -1- Microfilmed with board older 00055 `r• i r� i. { 4 i; • MkPR.APIY. Developer warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's resolution of , completion for the road acceptance, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Developer shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. S. NO SiAIVER BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent, or employee of the County indicating the wort: or any part thereof complies with the requirements of.this agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Developer of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bring- ing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 9. INDEASNITY. Developer shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section. - A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County,. and its special districts, elective, and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and : employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered,red, incurred, or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim, or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s), or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-neglib--. - in connection with a matters covered by this agreement and attributable to the ,Developer, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent, or employee of one or more of them. D. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specifications) in connection with this work or development or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any indemnitee. 10. COSTS. Developer shall pay when due all the costs of the work, including in- spections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 11. NONPERFORKANCE AND COSTS. If Developer fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherwise, and Developer shall pay the costs and charges therefc_ immediately upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Developer shall pay all reasonable attorney's fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewi.tf 12. ASSIGiRM£.\?. If before County accepts these improvements, the development is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. 13. CONSIDERATION. In consideration hereof, County shall, at such time as the improve- inents are constructed to County standards and are in conformance with said plans on file in -2- 00057 a i the Public Works Department, subject to inspection and approval of the Public Works Director, accept the public street improvements for maintenance. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEVELOPER: (see note below) VICTOR W. fSAUER, Public Works Director KAYILDING CO l _ - By �, - Y/ By G_ Scat n i s, ice F dent 061 rnon L. Cline, (Designat official capacit in the businer Chief Deputy Public Works Director I Note to Developer: (1) Execute acknowledg- REMMMED FOR APPROVAL: ment form below; and (2) if a corporation, affix corporate seal. Assistant Public Works-'Di7p�or (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSE.N, # County Counsel By Deputy State of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnershil • ! County of San Mateo ) ss. or Individual) On December 18th,1975 the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Developer and who is known to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signet this instrument personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) San Mateo County !lta.utauuunlutatunttmm x o-"FIws S="i = Notary Public for said County and State GEM V'EGUA 1TA;r Pii,.iIc •CALIFORNIA 1 MJ sat esp�u Il!/lE,fJl7 _ _ ?/HIUIIISlgiJftttiq/IY�At/�tMMKNtNMtMtNftt)1 00- 0 I Road # 554-40-44 C O M t AN Y OF L E R E A P t N G ► E N N S X l Y A M l A F3 .3 1976 PERFORMANCE BOND J. 2. of-,;o,, r0iiA -0. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:That we KAY BUILDING COMP Principal, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, Surety, are held and firmly bound unto County of Contra Costa , Obligee, in the sum of SIX THOUSAND FIFE MN93RED AND N0/100 ------------------------------------ -------------------------_ ----------Dollars ($ 6,500.00 ----- y for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our legal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severalty, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a camad with Obligee,dated December 18, 1975 for Tract 4336 - Danville Station - Model Site Paving Model Site (Silver Cloud Place) copy of which contract is by reference wAde a part hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, if Principal shall faithfully perform such contract or shall indemnify and save harmless the Obligee from all cost and damage by reason of Principal's failure so to do,then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. Signed, sealed,and dated December 18, 1975 , t RAY BUILDING COMPA14Y C ` � (Semi) . Prit E. J. Hedricknct, Tice President AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA by cJ !Wren G. Gischel Attorney-in-Fact s � 4 Form I-XI-266-LT Microfilmed with board order 000x"` j 1 STATE flFCALtFf1iRNlA � On this 18th day ofDecember»..« ina Barone thousand nine C©UNTYQF San Mateo d an hwWh d 75 berm me, item VeS�ad` - a Notary PWVW.State of CalifarW4 duty commisdoned and sworn.personally kaoroa to we to be the»».,mice Pres£dent of the corporation described in and that execrated the Whin instrument, and also known to nee to be the person....» who executed the within katn mat on behalf of the corporation ysiusiYn/iiYYiit YYtYYWY therein n6rned. and acknowkd9W to me that such corporation executed the OFl1C1lIS.St?L . .»»....»..«...»...«... SCAM cxuroenxa IN R►1Tl�IESS �►HBKiEOFI hear hereunto set my hand and affixed Trey official • ';�;- cou.eTv o; sup�xr►xso Santis tlu County of..»«San Pdate© ...F»..»»,the day and I uwislu+ i Year in this cer0i/%ate first abo raritttrt ICiY:tYYYYIiIIYiriYYY1YYYYYiIiiYtYYIIYYiYu ..... : .I►s.�re �s'�iC': F»:««.. »««»«..«».. Notary P4W S of California Cowdayzs Form No.29-A9kMOWI dpM9aY[brVMtk a{C G SOS.1190-11WI) MAW 502 sraTE of c�."RNIA OubTry December 18, 1975 . before lsze. the undersigned*a Notary Public of said county 0 Karen G. GiSchel and state.PerWrdily aPP --. tiosl that executed the within ias#enttttestt,known w me to laaou`n to me m be Attorney.m:Fact of the corpora ration therein named,and acknowl be the pes•son who executed dYe a-tthw instrument as behalf of the�Ss1 edged to me that such corPtxeatiaa executed the same- edged SEAL Notary Public y i;• T♦� w�rs{>=[w + .3.X5 Llne UX)O Band ` 554-40-44 Qf, f111 gSUA'L1 Y ` „ t ry N Ssoft O F A I N G . F P Ci tv & COUNTY O December 18, 1975 and state,personall a Karen G. Gischel before me. undersgned'a Notary Public of said county known to me to be the Attorney-ill-fact of the Mian that executed the within instrumen be the person who executed the n�ithin instrucaent an behalf of theme7r4�om to me to edged to me that such corporation executed the sameration thereiR named,and ow!- Notary Public so CAL 21.13 433 Cn-ama SL.. Ste,. I:a ;rKy, rZ ;Y\ R 10060 . .... 77-TIM" a. Bond ,1# 554-40-44 IERIONGfISUqITYGoMplINAY O F R E A D I N G . P E N N SFF A NN �IyA FILED PAYMENT BOND �=B J. it. OLSSON Co6v • rc SoAac Or x ltNow ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS: That SAY BUILDING COMPANY ;g.� cyra�p utas Principal, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, Surety, are Feld and firmly bound unto County of Contra Costa Obligee, in the sura of SEVEN THOUSAND AND NO/100 ------------------------------------- -------] -------------------------------------------------- Dollars($ 7,000.00 ------- ) for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our legal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severalty, firmly by these presents. 4 Wt1EREAs, Principal has entered into a contract with Obligee, dated December 18, 1975 for Tract 4336 - Danville Station - Model Site Paving Model Site ( Silver Cloud Place) copy of which contract is by reference made o part hereof. Now,TNEREFORE if Principal shall, in accordance with applicable Statutes, promptly make payment to all persons supplying labor and material in the prosecution of the work provided for in soil contract, and any and all duly authorized modifications of said contract that may hereafter be made, notice of which modifi- cations to Surety being waived, then this obligation to be void;otherwise to remain in full force and effect. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED December 18, 1975 KAY BUILDING COM2PL13Y do , (Seal) PrincipalE. J. Hedrick, Vice President AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA k. Karen C. Gischel Attorney-in-Fact Mivon"Imed with board order Form 8-23214-A E STATE OF CALIFORNIA City & San Franca ss. COUNTY OF December 18, 1975 On , before me. the undersigned,a Notary Public of said county and state.personally ap Karen C. Cischel lmown to me to be the Attorney-in-Fact of the corporation that executed the within instrument,known to me to be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of the two therein named, and acknowl- etixed zgMA.�t; 'on esem the same. '�y� r:'_` .L SE.-Xi RU e . .A TOS z-c_uFs�a Notary Public j-_3 COUJ%flf . t STATE OFC41JMJU0A Ole Uds 175h day of Dec�anbe em n the ear one thousand nine SL xa COUI,W GF San Mateo -------- - ---•befo e u ...»..»....«_.gi...._........«......«......«..... s Notary Peebti>;State of Wfornk duty commissioned and sworn,personally qWaved E. J. Hedrick_ « ««»«••«. «Vice President tnorean to nee to be the of the corporation described Rn in and that ex=ttd the within iustmwnt, and also known to me to be the osn=Ax s;- perso+e-•---. who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation �• GEM V� i=� _ therein wed and adneaale�d to nue that such corporation executed the _~ SURIC NOTARY ?UDUC C:'_*FORWIA .«•••»«••«••.««••«••»•.•..•••••••.««• a L:v •of =SA% a�is" zs�s�.o ;i _ IN Wn7WW WHEREOFI have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official in San Mateo liCi:I7iSua:uetteSeL'e21at14fUp1nun" a sea the County of ......_the day and year in this errafioate first above tant..��aL NotaryAubUc,State Cautm's r-mm No.29-Acknowtaipaew Corpootkm lC C_Secs 1190-119(L 1) Printed 5/72 s t 00069 I1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONITRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the :tap of Subdivision 4656, ) Alamo Area. ) RESOLUTION N0. 76/99 WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4686, property located in the Alamo area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with WILite Gate Developers, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bonds No. 5966557 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland with White Gate Developers as principal, in the amount of $158,600 for Faithful Performance and $159,100 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132915, dated January 30, 1976), in the amount of $500, deposited by: White Gate Developers, 2354 Stanwell Drive, Concord, CA 94520. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement be and the same is also APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 3, 1976. originating Department: Public Works cc: Subdivider County Auditor-Controller Public Works Director Tax Collector's Office Director.of Planning Subdivider: Jbite auto Devo lopars RESOLUTION NO. 76/99 2354 Stanaoll Drive Conoord, Californis '4!;20 00oerl f; CJ l ! tSMIC t_GIIEEVT_:NT (§1; 4686 (B. F: P. Codc §§11611-121 White Gate Developers 3i) -Ffie:tive Date: (§1) Co^.?etion Period: One year (§,) Deposits: A. (cash) $300 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful performance F maintenance) $158,600 2. (labor & materials S159,100� 1. PARTIES it DINE. Effective on the abo:a date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "C4:a;nty", and the abovenared Subdivider, mutually._ prardsr and aLree as follows corcer:ring this se by=_vision: 2. DIPkOMIENTS. Subdivider shall crnstract, install and complete road ane sire t i.apro:•e:c_rts, tract drainage, stre::t si-S:.s, fire hydrants, and all improvexent. as required by the County O-rdinance Cede, especially Title 9, and including future ame%,dments, and all impr-oveze,-.ts required in the appra%ed itprovenent plan of this ss bdi11sicn on !tile in the. Cow ty's Public Forks Dena:trent. Subdivider shall conplete this work and inpro►ements (hereinafter called '`.:ork") witl n the above completion peried from date he.eof as required by the California Subdivision Map Act (Business 6 Professions Coee §§11.530 and following), in a good ' ork- ra101ike rannar, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner or supericr to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereu.cer; and ich•re there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GJAP- TEE € AL ME�?`:CE. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and still be free :ren defects and will per-oro satisfactz_ily in accordance with Article 94-4.= of the Countv Ordinance Cade; and he shall cai.^._?in it for one year after its completion anti acceptance against any defective wortxanship or raterials or any unsatisfactory perfor:::ance. 4. I;•IPROVEME%T SEI-MM : GEMSIT 8 I~tiDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business 6 Prod-"essions Code §11612, deposit as security vith the County: A. Cash: $S30 cash; and.... E. Bonds, etc.: ii - faithfui performance $ maintenance) additional security for at least the above-specified amount, which is the total esti,aced cost of tl:e seer: less $500, in t.':e form of a cash deposit, a certified cr cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety berd, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agree:ent ar. raintenarce of t?:e work for ona year after cc=pletion and acceptance thereof aga4nst any defective wor�=wiship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; club (2- labor nsserials) another such addition-al security in at least the above-specified a:re:int, s:l:iclr is the full of said- estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons =erting equirrcnt or furnishing labor or rater ials to theta or to the Subdivider. S. h'AF,RXNTY. Sub-_ivide. warrants that said i^prorement plan is adequate to a.c= -li,h this hors: as promised in Section :; a i:, at any time before the County's _losolction of completion for the subdivision, the improvement plan proves to be iraveauate in any respect, Subdivider shall nake charges necessary to accomplish the work as pro,isec�. Microfilmed with board order , 064i i G. NO 1_,111 LR 62 CQ:I::7Y. Inspection of the work anti/or materials, or approval of Korb: are/or natLz'lals irsCe::ezl, or b%. any officer, agent or employe of t3`e ounty indicrting the liar': ?r any Dart t1.z.-co :.o-plies with tic regnire--Mats of l-.Is Agree:rent, or acceptance of xLe :•hole or any cart .o: said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any curb nation or all o` t�+ese acts, snz11 not xelieve the Subdivider of Ids obligation to fulfil! this co:tract as vrescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped fro-_ bringing an actin:+ fc. d-nnages arising from the failure to co rply with any of the terms a,-:d conditions hereof. 7. INI)BVITT. Subdivider shall held harnless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this sectio: : A. The indemr._.ees benefited and vrotected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, co=issions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any hind allegedly sa;fered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal =n dry, death, property darage, inverse condemnation, or a;ly combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any tire before the County approved t:ie improvemer_t plana or accepted the improvements as cerpleted, and including the defense of any suit(s), acticn(s) or other proceeding(s) concerrinS these. C. The actions causira liability are any act or omission (neolioent or non-ne"liger_t) in connection +:it:: tine ratters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or core of them. D. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Irides-nitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indernification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indernnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay wher= dse, all the costs of the work, includ no inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set an' establish survey monuments irs accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Co issioner-Surveyor. 10, NOXPERFORa%T_E :a.:7 COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvc=teats within the time specified in this Agreecent or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherxise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor i=ediately upon de^and. if County sues to compel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, casts of suit, and all other expenses of 2itigatien incurred by County in connection. therewith. 11. ASSIUME"T, If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the Couatr may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreecent and/or any deposit or bond securing t1hem. 00065 -12. REi:+3M KkP. In consideration 4ereof. County shall allow Subdivider to rile' - and record the :=nal Map or Parcel ;yap for said Subdivision. . a cost-- and charges thereror =e_,;ia%.eiy uj,_ ,& of this Agreement or recover the cost of cOr-Pleting the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, aju4 all other expenses of "Litigaticr- incurred by County in connection therewith. 11, ASSIMMEN'T. If before Coapt,,' accepts these improverients, the subdivision —a -o� assign to that city the County's rights under this is annexed to city, the County may 4. Agreenent and/or any deposit or bond securing them. 0o065 -12. RECORD M-AP. In consideration 4ere-of, County shall allow Subdivider to file' and record the Mall MaporParcel -Map for said Subdivision. C04\7&k COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) VICTOR Public Wo s Director BY y BBy ve_rhi�o�n J.. Cline. {ties' at official capacity in the bdsinass) Chief Deputy Public Works Director Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment RECON1,11!F_%DED FOR APPROVAL: form below; and (2) if a corporatz-on, affix corporate seal. B Y- Assistant Publ-4&-Works .011r or (CORPORATE SEAL) 4. FORM APPROVED: JOILN B. CLAUSEN. County Counsel BY Deputy State of California ifornia ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of or Individual) On the person(%) Whose name(4) is/are signed above for Subdivider and7tho is/a.-e Tnoun to me to be the individual(s.) and officer(s,) or partner(s) as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that -he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. OFFICIAL StAt. SY.I.VIA A. !A`�EMAM (NOTARIAL��Q 71 22. 1379 Y A" Nota_ Public County and state t(St ,bdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 9/75) 0006t* 90WARD W.LEAL •_ ALFRED P.LOMELI Cou�ty Treasurer-Tyr Collector Assistant County Treasurer-• 'FAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE - TK Collector" Phar and aL'aentble of Toss CONTRA A COSTA COLS T r DoU Installment of Toles Due mad Poyabie �fjv j�� COUNTY� ��Went on the FL-st Day of Noeembat os tbs Tootle Dar of Deveaber -----_ YARMEZ.CAUFOR.NIA Second lastallment of Torp Phone,=28-3000.Eau 2345 Second lastall=mt of Ta"s Due and Payable30 yt' 1976 Delinquent on the First Dar of Febeaatr January os the Tongs Dar of Aytlt IFS THIS TB.zCT IS Wr r IL=K BY F BRUk 281976 , THIS 1SX-MER. ZS VOM r 4 This vM certify that I nava examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: TRACT NO. 4686 and have determined ,from the o-Mcial tax records that there are no unpaid count taxes heretofore levied on the properhy included in the map. The current 1975-76 tax lien has been paid is fu12. Tax Collect. A. 1 ' Deputy dl a x i A \\ nnom�``^^jj �n�n//// �Vv7 S Microfilmed with board order g V for. the tent (� c66r•-� ( t�itsl p=rfo ce F z:aiate.=ace, QOM tabor cs materials) - FE 31975 (Cal:-r. Sus.'L Prof. a 911612) - J. A OLS57N Wil.=;K &: AA R3 or sunIrISOW3L TM- WHIZZ GATS a Pastmwzb p camposed of. Cc. - su % a Ho ra"ac�itOld ii. 9aith 7s �s Principal, !y {aLrt_:; �_ .', ».r,T^V A►it1 t1r QST" Qt•1P�a�Y,(}R TrtQRy G tt , a corporation orgsai: :�•` existira uadar the lays of the State of Mp--viand and au:tho_-z:s .a transact surety business in California, as Surety, hereby jointly and , savers:2y =:rd ourselves, cur hers, exec:tors, zdainistzators, successors and assigns to the Cc__y of Coates Costs. Calitorala, to pay - tA. faithful max- b nainteusnx pZl���'jr ($'1' TWU3AUD . STT U611CM -- Dollars ( er itself or any city-assy:.---* under the -.=i-czted subdivision contract, Pte. 3. labor & raterim s) 0 _ �� •DIS '1 8 B D AIM �������������s.���� Dollars ,-108_n for tAu- oenef£t of persons p—::-:ed u Cats. ::.s. F Prof. Code §1 Rc'CITAL CF S"_'_?:-.rrSrQY CQ.ti'tP.AC3'. the Principal has contracted with the Co►.mty to stall and ps;► :x street, drainage, and other i=provements in Subdivision h%=bar 4685 , as spe ' :ed in the Subdivision Ag-eeanst, and to complete said tiork • within the : =e specified :z- Subdivision ftreeaeat for completion, all"in accordance with State +.d local lays a-.= _..lim33 the=under in order to satisfj conditions for filing of the fir.:' uap for said S-=c:.vsson. 3. CCN'9ITIGY_ .? a ?_iacipal faithfully performs all things required•of him according te.-'-%s :r= o£ said contract and improvement plan and improve- ments agre-- tni-by hin za~s C nty, then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall beco:- :._iIl a.d void, :-ce?t that the guarantee'of maintenance continues for the one-year gs- a-d is he :.:33y nays the contractors, subcontractors, and persons . rznti ec__ cr labor or raterials to thea for said work ar.3 irepro.,-=e,ts, .:.:3 pecks f =lairs of ..:.z.'-- liens, then this obligation as :o • Section 1-(3) z;:-=" shall b--== null and void; otherwise this obligation remains in fu22 force and No a3zz:ation of said contract or any plans or sprcificatioas of said work _ agreed to by :::: Pitcipal a^` the County shall relieve any Surety frog liabi21tli on this bond; and co:u_nt is hereby, gi.en to mace such alterations without further notice to or consent by Surety; and the Surety hereby waives the provisions of Calif: Civil Coda *2319, and holds itself bvu=d without regard to and independently of any action agaUst Princival whenever taken, and agrees that if County.sues ca this bond,Suety will pay reasonable r, ; attorney fees fixed by eon, as costs and inclu..ed in the judgment. SIMED AIND SEALED on PRINCIPAL SURETY ' •` ; ik _ a GA _DE "r.L HS ' FID£r� AND D='gOSIT COMPANY OF MA_ RI t, iD sty By o�.eJ-zri='�ac� S*tate of California A.-"' `• _ County of ) on the person(s) Vrose naee(s) is/are signed above for Surcty and who is known to tie to be 70he Attorneys)-in-Fact for this Corporate Surety, personally appeared before rhe and ack-nowledwed to ae that he/they signed the rane of the Corparation as Surety and his/their own names(s) as its Attorneys)-in-Fact. (:.'3TXRIAL SEAL) t o:ary Public for said County and brace _ wjcro(+Imed- with booed c ��lti�� a a w f r:, ff0FFlClAL§EAL S7dTE D� FQ �1 ' [ l57 "A A- LAKDAM4 OR911A P. r , "" � L '�.: A COU tTY L l ':+' 29 Ign ©n � before nu. ...L f!/I.rGz! �a otary ubCu.i and fo said•► county and State.persotrally 4 ""�""d � known to me to be a partner of du partncr*p that executed the within instrument and alto known to me to be the persoe_><ho executed it on behalf of sm*partnership and liuiwwkdged to me t�j`such parl`ners!", ecutedthe same. -oil notary is c nmisaoaad is another Comity to 611168t«to S;v w to prs•►memo of n.►m said"and nawx Coulty, Notary Pubic ( ) Microfilmed with board ordr j SPATE OF CALIFORNIA s Cur AND Cotrxnr(w Saar FsA:Ittsco On this 28th .ter"r J7 19 76 before me LEE MOGU^ a Notary Public—in and for the City and Cmaty and State afinessid,duty commiamoned and sutura,petsoaany appeared Paul G• RuSCh y known to me to be the person whose name is mdmc bed to the foregoing instrument as the 1 Attorney-in-Fact of the Fddity and Deposit Company of Maryland.and acknowtedged to s me that he subscribed the name of Fidelity and Deposit Company of XuTlaad thereto as w..••.••••••+•••••••SI�Oa�3tti;own name as Attorney-im-Fact, c • OFFICIAL SEAL : ( LEE &IO L.1A � I NOTARY PUBLIC CA,IFORUTA: .! .. i COUNTY Of SAN FRANCISCO : Notary Pu mad fon the State o Calif ! • Yt Lar.+�iss�oe E4,tires v;, t- li:o • Ci d Count f ter•••••••••••••••••.•..••.••.. ty anY oSAD FtaaCiscD ( San Frsodan t9aSaa � I L • i 00069 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF C4177A COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Map of Subdivision 4685, ) RESOLUTION N0. 76/100 Alamo Area. ) h'HERF.AS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 468S, property located in the Alamo area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with White Gate Developers, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; *MREASS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety bonds No. S966SS9 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland with Ithite Gate Developers as principal, in the amount of $58,200 for Faithful Performance and $58,600 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132915, dated January 30, 1976), in the amount of $500, deposited by: White Gate Developers, 2354 Stanwell Drive, Concord, CA 94S20. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the nap, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement be and the same is also APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on February 3, 1976. Originating Department: Public Works cc: Subdivider County Auditor-Controller Public Iforks Director Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning RESOLUTIOj\ xo. 76/100 Subdivider: I&ite Gate Develovers 235 . Stanwall Drive Concord, California 94520 00070 9M;!.!i'ISMX AGREEMENT (91) Subdivision: 4685 (S. F, P. Code 9§1.1611-12) (§1) Subdivider: White Gate Devel,les 1) l°f e-etive Date: (51) 'Coripletion Perim : One year (M) Deposits: A. (cash) S500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful performance L maintenance) $S8 100 2. (labor 6 materials)$58,600 1. PARTIES $ DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "Co end the abovenamed Subdivider, mutually._ , promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. V1,Tl t!M E'i5. S•.ib3ivider shall construct, install and complete road and street imp.ovMats. Traci drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, and including future anendwents, and all improvements required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Public Works Departrent. Subdivider shall caaplete this York and improvements (hereinafter called 'W rk") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivision kap Act (Business 6 Professions Code MIS00 and following), in A good work- manlike warner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a narxer equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings Cade thereunder; and �hers there is a conflict bet -keen the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, tha�stricter requirements shall govern. • 3. GUARAW. M 8 A1:1Ihi MNCE. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be free from defects and will Fe- ora satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of tate County Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workttmnship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. Ii OROVEIMkT SECURIM DEPOSIT & SOr%'DS. Upon executing this Agra ement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business 6 FiWcssions Code 911612, deposit as sevarity With the Count: • A. Cash: $S00 cash; and.... B. Bonds, etc,: (I - faithful perfornatice 6 maintenance) additional security for at least the a ere-specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of time work less $S00, in the sora or a Lash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agreement and maintenance of the wort: for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defectire tzrkmanshir or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2- labor 6 materials) another such additional security in at least the above-specified acoant, + w1hich is the full anou�A of said estimted cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to Persons reatinv, equipment or furnishing labor or raterials : to thea or to the Subdivider. S. YAM,:TY. Subdivider warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this u►arL as promised La Section 2; and if, at any tine before the County's resolution of completion for the subdivision, tke improvement plan prares to be inadequate in any respect. Subdivider shall =Le charges necessary to accomplish the work as promised. + + • 000 MkrofiGned with boord order 6. NO U'AI 'ER BV Coal:?LTi. Inspection of the earl: and/or !materials, or approval of trork ar.1/or c s.crial= inspected'., or staterent by any officer, agent or eta}ployee of the rovnty ,indicating the wort: or any part thereof complies wit:t the requirements of this R;;rcenent, or acceptance of zhe ~mole or any part or said work and/or materials, or payiacnts therefor, or any combination or all of these arts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; not -!gall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to cagily with any of the teras and conditions. hereof. 7. ItMeNIT1►. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees i from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, c issions, officers, agents and employees. B. Tile liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened beczuse of actions 'lefinad below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the impruvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), actio-.(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (n. egligert or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. D. Non-Conditions: The premise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee.. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the irork, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVTYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Cow.issioner-Surveyor. 10. A�'PERFORaiM:\CE AM COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this Agreement or extensions granted, Couity may proceed to complete thea by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor immedia-ely upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the icproveaents, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation- incurred by County in connection therewitlt. 11, ASSIQ%'NM%M If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing thea. a _ 9 — x110'72 t - i 12. RE,,-OPD K'AP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the Fina? Map or Parcel Map for said Subdivision,. ,I CON=TRA COSTA CONY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) VICTOR W. UER, Publi4h -�I- " Director ' BY� BY V Cline, (Des' official ca acity in tt business) Chief Deputy Public Works Director Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment REMD ENDED FOR APPROVAL: form below; and (2) if a corporation, affix corporate seal. BY Assistant Public oris Di or (CORPORATE SEAL) FORS: APPROVED: JO.M B. CLAUSEzX, Count- Counsel By Depu y10 State of Cor (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnershi.3, County of %.,; m-A- ss' or Individual) O ' /-1 -; 74L� the person(Q whose name(t) is/are-signed above for Subdivider and who is azaknown to me to be the individual( and officer(3) or partner=s.) as statad above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that -he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. OFFICIAL SEVIA A- AL f• i IAA S?"�r FJQ_s_. CA-7;ansA .\.�/tel :_l F `mo• ia no (NOTA r . £ -3 r.tY Y -�_� 1 :M� .rwn � Z,// Notary Public for said County and State (Subdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) LD-9 (Rev. 9/73) -3- 000 73 EDWARD W.LEAL ALFRED R Louzu County Treasurer-Tax collector AssLtaot County Treasurer- TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE Tax Collector First Installmentof Tax.. Fir andndPayablee CONTRA COSTA COUNTY D FUst lastallcaent of Taxes eprent w the First Dor of Neeemb4w on the Tenth Day of December k ________ MAKMEZ.CAUFOIWIA Sticond L"tallment of Taxes Pba"229-3000,Fact.239S Second Installment of Taxes Due and Parable Day bruary Januarg 30 1976 Deltngyeat as the First of Fi s an the Tenth Day of April IF TIM TRW-1- IS NOT i ILSs BY YMRM;C 28, 19 76, THIS I:. r.. IS VOID r This gill certify that I hava examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: ?M:, SIO. 4685 and have determined frog the official tax records that there are no unpaid county taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the reap. The current 1975-76 tax lien has been paid is full. Tax Collector t By: V11-1 !E . r Deputy dl a Mian ilmed with board order o a74 • l8L2.00 for. tie tent t.F'ao - _ A 5966 L E D Zante=C'-. AND � •. &ls.•� prof. C6C 1labo a aate:rials) . FEB 1976 - WHITE GATE DEV= atKK ao:. L a.t �r•rn�r tanfvrd L::Ho]jWM SHarold� smith rL `, : .. a tL n n;.vr►^r-• �.,.. - • �' /-x �Deputy dl M;aafilrned With board aider ' "„AMS• .t. J►,. $872.00, - for the tern ther004 596655:1.-' Y :t Sil",iQ.S 15h1:i aith'=ul g �`or�s.•stes 6 =irate=-ice, AND labor r-s caterials) r - (CsL•:. Bus.-4 Prof. Coda:911612) 197 Fta .,� 6 I_ os ra�ta�_ -WHITE GATE DEVELOPERS, a Partnershipcanposed of . 'taafo_r_d L:- Holmgren-� Wold W. Smith as Principal, - _- �,,_ r.7^� B n- "Pt%ST^ *•t?aT _ F 2 Q * .Q . 2, corporation ,K CeN�TYi IZ�s_'. ez t21 coi.:ar the laws at the State of �i2CV!?tL and act surety business in Californi, as Surety, hereby jointly and, zrveral—sy ind oum-selves, our heiiz, executors, xdainistrators, SUCCC530 S and assigns • to the Cz=--y of Coates Costa. California, to pay it. r". faith,-Nd ti a--..ue 8 aasnter nine) FZF"'PY EIGHT THOUSAND • • flYE _..-__ Dollars (S2- -;l0Q:rt10-) far itself or any_- caty-sss_3..ea, under tike belc-.s-citedts�+ub�d�ivision contract ♦1Pllu�s�Tv t�7��rypt�T� . a. labor 6 1t4�-:*S) 'T'n is EIW_TF ISM SIX si�K 1*ZD1 AiYU NO' ,-..-------------- Do-Isars'�8;600.OQJ fa= Yrcr t,eneEit of persons g—_acred fie- W. 3:s. $ Prof. Code §11612.� 2- RzCl2'ALL OF S 7.r.SM11 COP."TP.ACT. The Principal has contracted with tha County to Mall and g!y --- street, drainage, and other improve-nems in Subdivision 1.�,r 4685 , as spec r !__ a the Subdivisiene Agreement, and to coa,plete said eiork . within Ut =tae specified 4== Subdivision Agreement for coppletion, 211 in accordance with State rr.d local la::s a-..: =11ir,;s theremder in order to satisf/ conditions for filing . of the fir.i nag for said 5• `c ssoa. - 3. CtlNDMTM. !Zr faithfully performs all things required,of hitt according = :ya t,-� c�t;.ons of said contra;t and isapzoyeatcst plan and iziprove- nents agree: :a by him s -.:nty, then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall becc=e :-ill and trod, except that the guarantee of maintenance continues for the ane-year r--=d; and if I` 2-=:iy Pays the contractors, subcantractors, and parsons . renting or fz .z4s --.g labor or materials to them for said work and improveomnts, - . ==:-as �= w'azcs of ==!.- 'i then :his obligation as to • Srction 1-(3; s;:rr- shall btc..ae null and void; otherwise this obligation mins in full force and e_::ec•. : ' 2:0 a3:e--asos of said ecatract or any plans or specifications of said work - agreed to by the P:_hcipal and the County shall relieve any Surety fron liability'on this bond; and co-.sant is here3y given to rake such alterations withaut further notice* to or consent by S=t y; and the Surety hereby waives the provisions of Calif,.. Civil Code 52913, and holds itself bout without regard to and independently of any action against Princigsl whenever taken, and agrees that if Ccunzzy sues 0.1this bond,Su.-'ety Will pay reaS06--b- e, attorney fees fixed by ccort as costs and included in the judgoeat_ 81GNMO AND SEALED on 28;:.1976 '.z' •••�' •- PRI1ClgA1. L SUUnTY !GA ME I3 � �'"RS � _1 FIDE1, AND EPOSI T COMPANY -OF MAHYLM0 By ...`!*.�. l.i i!!!l ii.ssi!!!�il.!!lirii. ii►1► _rte `if: Os♦i!•i-:tnl7 ! - State o ia. )ss. tT CaliforncPY SU'.! . 2SL 3C4 County of ) ' _ On the person(s) whose rawe(s) is/ire signed above for Surety and u3►o is pun to sic to be the Attorn--y(s)-in-Fact for this Corporate Surety, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to sic that he/they signed the recce of the Corporation as Surety and his/their win names(s) .s its Attornry(s)-in-Fact. (l tJT,1ltI.�L SCAL) t5tary Pmolic forsiid County and Sit,cc (LD 3/7•.) Wcrofilmed with boa order 1 S: S i OFFICIAL SEAL SI.i76F'+ ! RNIB SL � NOT= acto_iG-GaC;sORMR ._.... ..e[_. �--- yGwri•.nsd.dw ±ei+�.rkwrM. :'T::^idP. CrCy«".°.iC«..ttty" : r72, 1479� QK /. before `. t zeinGC 7 Public.in and for said•' ' r Cwcnry and Smse.persmwUy L wa to aw to be a Pyr of the Pwrtaesy/slp that executed the:within instrument and alta known to the to be doe perWft ___. WjW end it an bAdf of s prtrtsursJFrp .ac rfedged tv me such parrrnrrih�execuudrhe tante. notary is 00fivWxd0fted eet 4moacr Count, strike ixdd" and rage Coam. r"m a Pew rypu.e�+tarovy Notary Public (Partaaship Graator7 t { STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cay Axth Couxw or Sart Faea.�oa 76.be[ote rnt • bu this 28th �Y a;Rotary Public,in and for the City aa County and State Paul G. Busch t , duty sod s ram perso*Ay ati -,.. k w.nai to we to be the petaons.bole mm is sabs="bed to the torezoiuz instrument as the Attom ey in-Fact of the F'Weray and Deposit CaaPMY of Maryland.and acknowie 4ed to nae asst he subwraad the name of F'ddity and Deposit Company of bfarYta:nd thereto as r , ow name as Attorney-in-Fact: LEE hl w+ "`' t ou'.t� t?# sa'• t at:;53�J 1;otary Pu m sad for the State u Cat' xI. • Mt tam*-�. t*:Yarn W-. t • Gly and County or Sass Fsa�ncisco 14.....1........ear...��►.......+ ss m Frame I'mm • 100 i V J1ltitrofilmed Wt�1 kaoard OlCe'.a' _ IH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU.'iTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Hatter of Authorizing County Welfare Director to Pay Pre-Placement Costs to Lane Children's Center RESOLUTION NO. 76/201 WHEREAS the Board having this day considered the recommendation of the County Administrator that it authorize the County welfare Director to -- make payment to Lane Children's Center for pre-placement visits not to exceed two weeks at a per diem rate consistent with the rate approved by the Board in Resolution No. 75/523; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that the aforesaid recommendation is hereby APPROVED_ PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board. on February 3, 1976. t cc: Director, Human Resources Agency Social Service; H. Hallgren Probation Officer County Administrator - County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTIOU 110. 76/101 0007 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION,NO. 76/102' In the Hatter of: ) HR 8911, a Bill to Improve the , ,Federal Administration of SSI/SSP. j j WHEREAS this Board having been advised by the Director, Human Resources Agency, that passage of HR 8911, now pending in the House of Representatives, will: (1) result in savings of County staff time and funds, (2) benefit aged, blind and disabled residents of the County, and (3) assist in completing the transfer of administration of adult aids from the counties to the Federal Government; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that this Board urges passage of HR 8911. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of this Resolution be sent to the National Association of Counties, Congressmen Ronald V. Dellums, Fortney H. Stark, and George Willer, III, United States Senators Alan Cranston and John Tunney, the County Supervisors - Association of California, and the Chairyian of the House Ways and Means Committee. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 2976. cc: Human Resources Agency U. S. Congressman Ronald V. Dellums U. S. Congressman Fortney H. Stark U. S. Congressman George Miller III U. S. Senator Alan Cranston U. S. Senator John Tunney U. S. Congressman James C. Corman Chairman, House days and Means Committee County Supervisors Association of California National Association of Counties County Administrator County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 76/102 I I BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COWRA COSTA COUPJTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Requesting an allocation from ) the State Grade Separation Fund ) Resolution No. 76/103 ' for Waterfront Road (Peyton) } Overcrossing , Martinez Area ) (Project No. 3481 -4215-74) ) ) WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa in cooperation with the City of Martinez, has prepared preliminary .plans for the reconstruction of the Waterfront Road (Peyton} Overcrossing ,of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company tracks east of 1 -680; and WHEREAS this proposed project may be eligible for 80. percent financing from the State Grade Separation Fund which is administered by the State Department of Transportation, and ; in this event, the remaining 20 percent of the project cost would be shared equally by the County and the City of Martinez; and WHEREAS to obtain an allocation from the State Grade Separation Funds, it is necessary for the County to follow the procedures in Section 2456 of the Streets and Highways Code; z • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS of the County of Contra Costa that the Public Works Director is hereby AUTHORIZED to request an allocation for the project from the State Grade Separation Fund, and contingent upon receiving an eighty percent allocation for the project from the Grade Separation Fund a. sufficient local funds will be made available by the: County of Contra Costa as the work of the project progresses and, b. the County of Contra Costa intends to accomplish all necessary matters prerequisite to awarding the contract and to award a contract for the construction of the project no later than one year after the date such allocation is received. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. cc: Public Works County Administrator County Counsel f Southern Pacific (via P.W. ) City of Martinez (via P.W. ) (P) REESOLUTIOII 110. 76/103 00079 a� i i 1 RESOLUTION NO. 1it'J RESOLUTION DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR CONSTRUC- TION BIDS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MEDIAN LANDSCAPING IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3, SAN RAMON, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that this Board of Supervisors hereby orders that the installation of median landscaping in Assessment District No. 1973-3, San Ramon, Conte Costa County, California, be had and done in accordance with the plans and specifications for said work, which said plans and specifications are on file with the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa. Said Board of Supervisors hereby orders that bids for the installation of said median landscaping shall be re- ceived on the 24th day of February, 1976, at the hour of 11:00 o'clock A.M. of said day, in the office of the Clerk of the Board, Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California, which said time and place are hereby fixed as the time and place of a public meeting at which said bids will be publicly opened, examined and declared, will be calculated by the Engineer of Work, their report returned to the Clerk of the Board, and the report of the results of the bidding and • the calculations of the Engineer of work will be reported to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa. The -1- fa i 0 V 80 1 - . i Board of Supervisors reserves the right to reject any and all proposals or bids, should it deem this necessary for the public good, and also the bid of any bidder who has been delinquent or unfaithful in any former contract with the County of Contra Costa. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted_by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 3rd day of February, 1976. ATTEST: JAMES A. OLSSON, Clerk ec$ 13o06 Comma ftgIne a of i�erk George Gstdeu� Count o�uwl Public W= Director county A for County Audi tort ontrol2or Director of planar -2- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Be: Abandoning ) 76/145 Ivanhoe Avenue at its inter- ) RESOLUTION NO. section with Highland Avenue, Date: February 3, 1976 Road No. 3667H2 Pleasant Hill ) Resolution & Order area. Abandoning County Road (S.& H. Code 5959) - The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On December 9, 1975 this Board passed a resolution of intent on o abandon the county highway described below and fixing February 3, 1976 in its chambers, Administration Building, 651 Pine S reet, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon, and ordered that the resolution be published and posted as required by law, which was done as shown by affidavits on file with this Board. The hearing was held at that time and place, this Board hearing and duly considering evidence offered concerning the-abandonment. This Board therefore hereby finds that the hereinafter described County Highway dedicated to public use, is unnecessary for present or prospective use, and it is HEREBY ORDERED ABANDONED. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present on February 3, 1976. cc: Recorder Planning Commission Public Works Director Applicant County Administrator Pacific Eras and Electric Pacific Telephone East Bay Municipal Utility District Thomas Brothers Maps Contra Costa County 'Mater CERTIFIED COPY District I certify that this is a full. true & correv4-copy of Stege Sanitary District of the <,rtrctnal document which Is on [He in my nl:fcn. and!Lat it was passed & adopted by the uaard of Contra Costa County of Contra Costa Ccuntr. Calilorr.ia. on the fta!e Oowm ATTEST. J. R. of SSON. County Oakley County dater District CI.rE�rsoftirlo Clerk of said Board of Superviaore. San Pablo Sanitary District b- Lh-PutyClerk- FEB 3 1976 ote (Res. & Ord. Aband.) (CC-72:250:8/72) REsowwov No. 76/205 0000 k .. ROAD ABANDONMENT j Highland Avenue Road No. 3667H Portion of the parcel of land described in the deed to Contra Costa County, for the widening of Ivanhoe Avenue, recorded June 8, 1971 in Book 6400 of Official Records, at page 703, Records of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: Beginning on the northwesterly line of Ivanhoe Avenue as said road-is shown on the Parcel Map filed May 19, 1971 in Book 16 of Parcel Maps, at page 39, Records of said County, at the most southerly corner of said County Parcel (6400 OR 703); thence, from said point of beginning along the southwesterly line of said County Parcel (6400 OR 703) North 57 221 SO" Kest, S.76 feet to a point from which a radial line of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet, bears North 800 571 10" Kest, and along said curve through a central angle of 660 251 40", an arc distance of 23.19 feet to a point of cusp; thence, leaving said southwesterly line South 570 22- SO'- East, 14.94 feet; thence, southeasterly along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 20.00 feet, through a central angle of 220 191 1319, an arc distance of 7.79 feet to said northwesterly line of Ivanhoe Avenue; thence, non-tangent to said curve, along said northwesterly line, South 240 131 101' West, 10.61 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPTING AND RESERVING THEREFROM, pursuant to the provisions of Section 959.1 of the Streets and Highways Code, the easement and right at any time or from time to time for the owner of an existing facility used for utility purposes, limited to transmission and distribution for electric poker, telephone and other communication services, to maintain, operate, replace, remove, renew, and enlarge existing lines of poles, wires, and other convenient structures, equipment and fixtures for the operation of existing facilities including access to protect the property from all hazards in, upon, under, and over the street hereinbefore described to be abandoned by said County of Contra Costa. IMIMIT A Microfilmed with board order 00083 ti BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COMM, CALIFORNIA Re: Abandoning a portion of � RESOLUTION N0. Z�L1� Rustic Way, Road No. 2945T, ) Orinda—Rheem area. Date: R _ J , 6 Resolution & �der Abandoning County Road (S.& H. Code 5959) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On December 9 1975 this Board passed a resolution of infe—nTlon to abandon ta county highway described below and fixing February 3 1976 in its chambers, Administra on Building, b5l Fine Streg7t,, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon, and ordered that the resolution be published and posted as required by law, which was done as shown by affidavits on file with this Board. The hearing was held at that time and place, this Board hearing and duly considering evidence offered concerning the abandonment. This Board therefore hereby finds that the hereinafter described County Highway dedicated to public use, is unnecessary for present or prospective use, and it is HEREBY! ORDERED ABANDONED. DESCRIPTION: 1 See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present�on February 3, 1976. cc: Recorder Planning Commission Public Works Director Applicant County Administrator Pacific Gas and Electric Pacific Telephone East Bay Municipal Utility District Thomas Brothers Maps Contra Costa County Water District Stege Sanitary District of Contra Costa County Oakley County dater District San Pablo Sanitary District (Res. & Ord. Aband.) - (CC-72:250:8/72) RF..SOLUTION N0. 761106 oa��V i r - Rustic Way Road No. 294SU October 20, 197S ROAD ABANDO HENT Portion of the County road known as Rustic Way as said road is shown on the map entitled, 14loraga Glorietta, Unit No. 1, Contra Costa County, California," recorded July 7, 1938 in Book 22 of Haps at page 668, Records of Contra Costa County, -California, lying in the Rancho Laguna De Los Palos Colorados, described as follows: - tt Beginning on the southwesterly line of said Rustic May, at the south- easterly corner of Lot 47 as shown on said map of Horaga Glorietta, Unit No. 1 (22 MIB 668); thencS, along said southwesterly line N 35°00' 00" W, 115.00 i feet; thence, h' 55 00' 00" E, 50.00 feet to the northeasterly line of said ' Rustic Way; thence, along said northeasterly line S 3So00' 001' E, 117.69 i feet to the northeasterly prolongation of thb southeasterly line of said lot , 47 (22 MB 668); thence, along said prolongation S S80 04' 40" W, 50.07 feet- 1 t to the point of beginning_ , 1 00085 e I a N � ' A R:,,Mmed vrith board order � IIS , w, i I BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Abandoning of Alley D off ) Pacheco Boulevard, Pacheco ) RESOLUTION NO. 7 ins area ) Date: February 3, 1976 Reso u Son & Order Abandoning County Road (S.& H. Code 5959) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: , On December 9, 1975 this Board passed a resolution of in en on o an on t e county highway described below and fixing February 3, 1976 in its chambers, Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon, and ordered that the resolution be published and posted as required by law, which was done as shown by affidavits on file with this Board. The hearing was held at that time and place, this Board hearing and duly considering evidence offered concerning the abandonment. This Board therefore hereby finds that the hereinafter described County Highway dedicated to public use, is unnecessary for present or prospective use, and it is HEREBY ORDERED ABANDONED. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present; on February 3, 1976. cc: Recorder Planning Commission Public Works Director Applicant County Administrator Pacific Gas and Electric Pacific Telephone East Bay Municipal Utility District Thomas Brothers Maps Contra Costa County Nater District Stege Sanitary District of Contra Costa County Oakley County Water district San Pablo Sanitary District (Res. & Ord. Aband.) (CC-?2:250:8/72) RESOLUTION yo. 76/107 i II Pacheco Boulevard Road No. 3951C September 293, 1975 IOF PACHECO ABANDONMENT OF ALL D TOWN iK . i OriginalSurvey .at the Town Portion of Alley D of the of Pacheco, made by Dan Small, 1858, as shon-z on the map entitled, "Map of Pacheco, Contra Costa Cou-:�y,, California, ' filed in Book E of Haps at page- 952 Costa R_cords ,of Contra Costa described as follows: CCounty, California, All that portion of said Alley D lying westerly bf the westerly line of the parcel d Jlananua%'Y 9 3-197-3 in Bookn the d7406tof Contra Costa County, recorded Y Official Records, at page 291, Records of said County. I' i G - j Rimed with board order I �1.All x Pacheco Boulevard Road No. 3951C September 29, 1875 - ABANDONMENT OF ALLEY D TOWN OF PACHECO Portion of Alley D of the Original Survey,atthe Town of Pacheco, made by Dan Small, 18582 as sho4�:t on the map 'entitled, "Map of Pacheco, Contra Costa County, California, 1865," filed in Book E of Hags at page 95, Records of Contra Costa County, California, described as follows: All that portion of said Alley D lying westerly of the westerly line of the parcel of land described in the deed,to Contra Costa County, recorded January 9; 1975 in Book 7406 of Official Records, at page 281, Records of said County. I! . ;.,,.. •� _ ... 60=3 gr7& 00 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Resolution ) of Intention to Change the ) Name of Portions of 2nd Street ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/108 and 11th Street to PROSPECT ) AVENUE, Port Costa Area. ) ) WHEREAS it is the intention of this Board of Supervisors to change the name of certain County roads in Supervisorial District II; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board cause the following notice to be posted .for the time and in the manner required by law: N O T I C E NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board. of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California, adopted a resolution of intention to change the name of the following: ROAD NAME DESCRIPTION 2ND STREET Beginning at the intersection Port Costa area of Canyon Lake Drive and extending northerly, a distance of 0.02 mile 11TH STREET Beginning at the intersection Port Costa area shown on the old town map as 2nd Street and extending easterly and northerly to its point of termination, a distance of 0.17 mile (The Public Works Director recommends that. the name of portions of the aforesaid streets be changed to PROSPECT AVENUE) NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a hearing on said resolution of intention has been fixed for March 2, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, at which time and place the Board will consider the proposal in said resolution of Intention and any objections thereto. DATED: February 3, 1976 J. R. OLSSON County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California. By N. Ingr , Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 76/108 0� .00 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on February 3, 1976. County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California. By H. In ��U�C�lerk� RESOLUTION NO. 76/1Q8 FOR PROMPOW PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on February 3, 1976• I HEREBY CERTIFY that the goinIs a true and minutes of said Board fcorrect copy of a resolution entered ou the Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February, 1976• J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By .-In aham Deputy Clerk cc: Public Works Director Planning Commission Draftsman County Administrator Postmaster, Port Costa Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District John Swett Unified School District E.B.N.U.D., Oakland Attn: H. J. Wickman, Land Agent E.B.M.U.D., Walnut Creek Western Title Guaranty Company, Martinez P. G. & E., Company, Rodeo California Highway Patrol Pacific Telephone Company, Oakland bm d Pacific Telephone Company, RESOLUTION HO. 76/108 F °i i i I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTYOF , STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Resolution ) of Intention to Change the ) Name of a Portion of Barry Hill ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/109 Road to BARRY HILL COURT, ) Martinez Area. ) WHEREAS it is the intention of this Board of Supervisors to change the name of a certain County road in Supervisorial District II; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board cause the following notice to be posted for the time and in the manner required by law: N 0 T I C E NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California, adopted a resolution of intention to change the name of the following: ROAD NAME DESCRIPTION BARRY HILL ROAD Beginning at the intersection Martinez area of Barry Hill Road and extending easterly to its point of termi- nation, a distance of 600 feet (The Public Works Director recommends that the name of a portion of the aforesaid road be changed to BARRY :ILL COURT) NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a hearing on said resolution of intention has been fixed for March 2, 1976 at 11:05 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Adminis- tration Building, Martinez, California, at which time and place the Board will consider the proposal in said resolution of Intention and any objections thereto. DATED: February 3, 1976 J. R. OLSSON County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California. 3y N. Ingr , Deputy Clerk RESOLUTIO'N' NO. 76/109 p0Q�1 i PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on February 3,s 1976 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By N. IngoLham Deputy Clerk cc: Public Works Director Planning Commission Draftsman County Administrator Postmaster, Rodeo Rodeo Fire Protection District John Swett Unified School District W 4g E.B.M.U.D., Oakland ,- Attn: H. J. Wickman, Land Agent E.B.M.U.D. , Walnut Creek Western Title Guaranty Company, Martinez P. G. & E., Company, Nartinez California Highway Patrol Pacific Telephone Company, Oakland X Pacific Telephone Company, Nartinez f: z�t f f kh t x yy. e:t RESOLUTION NO. 76/109 0UQ92 f I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposed ) Sale of Surplus Portion of ) Danville Off--Street Parking ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/110 Property. ) (Assessment District 1973-4) ) On August 5, 1975 this Board referred a July 25, 1975 letter from Mr. Michael Flynn, Chairman, Danville Parking District Taxpayer Advisory Committee, requesting the Board to initiate the necessary action to effectuate the sale of surplus property within Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking) on March 16, 1976 to the County Administrator for review with the Public Works Director, the Director of Planning, and the County Counsel; and The County Administrator having recommended that the Board schedule a public hearing on this matter and make a decision on the sale after affected property owners have had an opportunity to present their views; and This Board having set 10:30 A.M. at this date for hearing on the request of said Advisory Committee that County initiate action to sell the surplus portion of the Danville Off-Street Parking prop- ' erty located on the westerly side of Railroad Avenue; and Mr. Al Kaplan appeared before the Board as representative of said Taxpayer's Advisory Committee and recommended that said sur- plus property be sold, and no one having appeared in opposition to proposed sale; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request of the Danville Parking District Taxpayers Advisory Committee is HEREBY APPROVED and the Real Property Division of the Public Works Depart- ment is DIRECTED to proceed expeditiously with the necessary require- ments for the sale and disposal of said surplus property in Assessment District 1973-4. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February, 1976. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK cc: Advisory Committee Attn: Chairman Bye n tZ(QJ r County Administrator Bonnie Boaz County Counsel Deputy Clerk Director of Planning Public Works Director Real Property Agent 00093 RESOLUTION NO. 76/110 l C f i. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COMA COSTA COUBTY, STATS OF CALIFCRRIA In the batter of the ) Proposed Criminal Justice Center and ) February 39, 1976 Court Addition. The Board having fixed this time to consider the jail.- initiative matter and the construction alternatives cited in the December 22, 1975 report of the County Administrator on the criminal justice detention center and court addition; and The following persons having appeared and commented on the aforesaid report at the invitation of Supervisor J. P. Kenny: Superior Court Judge Coleman Fannin and District Attorney William A. O'Nalley, who concurred that the County is using alternatives to incarceration to the fullest extent, and Judge Fannin having added that the courts are ready to consider new program as they become available and to utilize them whenever possible; and Reverend Palmer Watson, Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, who stated that the present jail compounds the problem for rehabilitation and offered his assistance in the design of a new facility; and Isis. Nary Otani, representing the League of Women Voters, Richmond and Diablo Valley areas, who urged that the Board promptly proceed with either alternative 3 or alternative 4; and Mr. William H. Wainwright, Citizens for Community Involvement, who urged approval of the fourth alternative for jail construction; and Mr. Francis X. Kroncke, American Friends Service Committee, who stated his opposition to all of the jail construction alternatives; and Mr. William Sharkey, III, President, Martinez Chamber of Commerce, who supported construction of the jail on the proposed site; and Q00a41 t l Sheriff H. D. Ramsey having aon®ented on the overcrowded conditions at both the County Jail in Martinez and the branch Jail is Clayton; and Zhe Hoard having discussed the matter; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having summarized the issues and the points made by the speakers, having indicated that it would be impractical to consider alternatives 1 or 2, and having recom- mended accordingly that the County Administrator investigate the necessary procedures to redesign the Jail in accordance with alternatives 3 or 4 and submit his report to the Board on February 10, 1976; and Supervisor B. A. Linscheid having commented that redesign will delay construction but because of cost considerations there does not appear to be any other option and he therefore would reluctantly support either alternative 3 or 4,* and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDl3R13a that the recommendation of Supervisor Dias is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. Z. Moriarty, B. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny NOBS: None ABSENT; Supervisor W. N. Boggess PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. at: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal County Counsel of the Board of Supervisors Sheriff-Coroner1affFebruary,, 976 this 3rd day of FeUruary J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By ca=n . er pu Q0(}'�� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for Removal and Reconstruction of } Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Portions of ) February 3, 1976 Driveways, Plastic Drains and ) Asphalt Concrete Pavement at #3091, ) #3095 and #3101 Kittery Avenue, ) San Ramon Area. ) (Project No. 5205-4297-75) ) } Bidder Total-Amount F. D. Marron Company $3,423.00 Route 1, Box 151 B Brentwood, California 94513 Apollo Concrete Company, Inc., Antioch Eugene G. Alves Construction Company, Pittsburg All-Cal Contractors, Fremont Ransome Company, Emeryville William A. Smith, San Ramon Peter Cole Jensen, Inc. Danville Mike Morgan, Walnut Creek The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public 1,;orks Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that the Public Forks Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it with any required certificates of insur- ance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign' the contract for this Board. The Hoard concurring with the County Planning Department that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as a Class I, County Environmental Impact Report Guidelines project, the Director of Planning is instructed to prepare and file with the County Clerk a notice of determination concerning the approval of this project. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. cc: Public Works Director COPY County Counsel I testify that this b a fult trite & correct cops of the asiginal document which is on Sip to my officer County Auditor—Controller and that It was passed & adopted by the Hoard of Contractor supervisors of Contra Costa County. California, on the date shawa ATTEST: J. R. OlSSON. County Director of Planning Clerk is es-o•ficle Clerk of said Board of supervisors, by Deputy Clerk. FEB 3 1976 000 13 P Pyp �� I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 19 76 In the Maher of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement vrith the City of Martinez for Reconstruction of the Waterfront Road (Peyton) Overcrossing, Martinez Area. IT IS BY THE HOARD OMEM that its Chairman is authorized to" execute a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement frith the City of Martinez providing for equal sharing of local costs (estimated to be 397,800 each) for the reconstruction of the 211aterfront Road dvercrossing of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company tracks east of I-680. PASSED by the Board on February 3: 1976- I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corre+d copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public :-corks Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 3rd day of February . 1g 76 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON Clerk Souther.n PacificCv:_2 P `.`l City of it3art ez {{via P:11: ey Deputy Clerk Rondal Sl-a c:-cl s 00097 H 24 am .0" i JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT - WATERFRONT ROAD (PEYTON) OVERCROSSING PROJECT NO. 3461-4215-74 1 . Parties. Effective on FEB 3 MR the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, and the CITY OF MARTINEZ, a municipal corporation within the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as CITY, pursuant to Government Code Sections 6500 ff mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Purpose. The County and City propose to reconstruct as a cooperative project, the Waterfront Road (Peyton) Overcrossi-ng of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company (hereinafter referred to as RAILROAD) tracks. The project is eligible for partial fund- ing from the State Railroad Grade Separation Fund. 3. Previous Agreement. An agreement between the County and City was made on October 21 , 1975 regarding the first phase of preliminary engineering work. Nothing in this agreement shall supersede the previous agreement and any deposit and adjustment required under this current agreement will give due considerations to the provisions in the previous agreement. 4. Administration Responsibility. (a) The County shall prepare and submit all applications for State and railroad participation, obtain all Public Utility Commission approvals, complete the pre- liminary engineering, right of way engineering and acquisition, advertise for bids and award a contract for construction to the lowest responsible bidder, perform all pavement striping, and perform all construction engineering and contract administration, both inside and outside the City, the expense of which shall be shared jointly as provided hereinbelow. (b) The City, prior to the County advertising for bids, shall approve the plans and specifications for the work within the City 's jurisdiction, (c) The City and County shall jointly review and approve the Contractor ' s bids and concur in the recommendation to award prior to the awarding of the contract by the County. (d) Contract change orders within the City' s jurisdiction shall be approved by the City. (e) The specifications (contract documents) for the project shall include provisions requiring the successful bidder to (1 ) name the City as an additional insured on any required insurance certifi - cates and (2) promise to hold harmless and indemnify the City from liabilities in the same manner as he must provide such for the County. 5, Indemnifications. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to affect the legal liability of either party by imposing any standard of care respecting work performed hereunder different from the standard of care imposed by law. The City shall fully defend , hold harmless , and indemnify t - County, its officers , agents, and employees against any and all claims . demands, damages, costs , expenses or liability costs aris- ing out of or in connection with any work performed under this Agreement, except for liability arising out of the sole negligence of the County, its officers , agents , or employees . orXil i18 �x The County shall fully defend, hold harmless , and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, and employees against any and all claims, demands , damages, costs , expenses or liability costs aris- ing out of the- sole negligence of the County, its officers, agents, or employees. 6. Financial Responsibility. The estimated cost of the project is $97S.000. The project costs for preliminary engineering , con- r struction ( including contingencies) , construction engineering, and right of way, (plus all costs for right of way acquisition) , day labor, including striping, plus appropriate overhead and costs payable to Railroad for Railroad 's expense incurred during the con- struction phase of the project , are eligible for 80 percent funding from the State Railroad Grade Separation Fund. The remaining costs shall be borne equally by the County and City. 7. Deposit and Adjustment. The City, prior to the County -adver- tising a contract for construction shall deposit with the County the sum of 597,800 less any amounts deposited and not refunded pursuant to the previous agreement dated October 21 , 1975, as the City' s share of the estimated cost of the project. As soon as possible after the County has determined the final costs for the project, the City shall either be reimbursed for any excess sum owing it from its deposit, or the City shall pay promptly to the County any additional sum that may be due and owing the County over and above such deposit. Final adjustments will be made, if any, after the completion of the State and/or Federal audit. There shall be no revision of cost to the City or the County due to a change in the City boundary after the date of award of contract. . 8. Accountability. Each party is strictly accountable for all funds and must report all receipts and disbursements. 9. This agreement is contingent upon the County receiving an allocation in the amount of 80 percent of the project cost from the Railroad Grade Separation Fund. In the event no funds or lesser funding is received from the Railroad Grade Separation Fund , the County and City may jointly elect not to proceed with the project or to proceed with the County and City shares increased proportionately. 10. Maintenance Responsibility. County shall authorize final acceptance of the contract work as complete after approval by the City, at which time the County and the City shall within their respective limits, immediately accept complete maintenance respon- sibility for the roadway, bridge and all appurtenances so con- structed as described herein. I ] . Term of Agreement. Except for the provisions of Paragraph 10, this Agreement shall expire upon acceptance of the construction as complete by the Board of Supervisors and the payment of all sums required herein by the parties from one to the other , and after the completion of the State and/or Federal audit. This Agreement shall terminate if a contract for construction of the project is not awarded within two years of the effective date of the Agreement. 2 - O0a "'t 12. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may be modified at any time by mutual consent of both parties. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CITY OF MARTINEZ ' 8y BY P., ha r an, Board ofjSupi visors H or ATTEST: ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk City Clerk Deputy ft By "' RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: �.Vi.ctor' W. Sauer, Public Works Director BY ` ChiefDeputy Pub is Works D rector FORM APPROVED: FORM APPROVED: John B. Clausen, County Counsel By By Deputy - 3 Wi0o OMMIC" MD. ?5-75 f WOM EATS, there h ss been presented to Of s r eetl ng of the Ci t jPl ' Council of the City o= :'artinazz a Joint Exercise of F•wers Agreweat bebow %he Ci ar arc w= County of Contra Costa 1 or tie purpose of reconstructing, as ; ccaperative ¢:ofstt. the :+a:srfrjnt Road (Peri tivercrossin; of the Scu'hern pacific Traroportat;or. Company tracks; anif UV PEAS, the details of financing have bear. ex-plained to the Cit{ Cc.ureil by the City -Pgi-eer, and the City Co•3nc4*: deans it in the bests Interest of the City ,o enter into said Agr enmz. i ,i,;11, ' IEEREh �,E, BE IT REMLVE: by the City Council of the city i of *firth:ez that ftt 4-%yor be and he is bevft mWarized to sign said Jolat Exercise w a"rs Alrea mt wf rb toe County of Contra �. Costa for the purpose of fwmastruetiapp. as a•co•:r3ratfve mVjact, the Waterfront Road Veym n) Orercrossing of the Southern Pacific Trans- � sortation Compare► tracks. ? REP.EBY CER'T'IFY that the foregoing is a tnae. and correct copy.. 1 of a resolution duly adoomd by the City Cowdl of tte City of Martfwz. at a regular aeetin-7 of said Council held on the Usk day of January, 1976. by the follovine vote: AYES: Councilmen - xR.:•j'SE, LAKE, Rf4010E, SPA?,ACINO. Tho"H t:3ES: Co:nwil:w - VIE MEW: Councilmen - I'SrM . r3-STAIN: Coca::i i r vn - NO* �rti neat C3I f fornia QUA . �I ., : • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 1976 In In the Molter of Granting Navajo Aviation, Inc. an Extension of Time to Pay Their Percentage Rental Due. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, the Board GRANTS Navajo Aviation, Inc. , lessee at Buchanan Field, an extension of time to February 29,` 1976 in which to pay their percentage rental, subject to interest at 1-1/2 percent per month. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forsgoinp is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said 800rd of Supervisors on the date oforesokL cc: Navajo Aviation (via P.W. ) Witness my hand and dw Seo[ of the Boo rd of Public Works Director supervisom County Counsel affixed this 3rd day of February . 1976 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Airport Manager County Administrator By Deputy Clerk N. In &ham oo102 1424 8PS IOU .,z. Map i i f -BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: -CALIFORNIA Re: ) Pursuant to Section 21356 and. ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 21303 of the CVC, declaring, a FEB 3 1976 yield intersection on ROUIMHM Date: DR. (Rd. 37F) Alamo area (Supv. Dist. v - A-, j The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 21356 and 21803 of the California. Vehicle Code, all vehicles traveling masterly on RODNDem m. (Rd. #44377)., Alamo, ars bareby required to yield the right df vw to traffic on Roundhill Road. Adopted Jy the&=rd FEB 3 1916 cc County Administrator Sheriff .. � California Highway Patrol ` T-i4 VO4w s In the •BoaM. of Supervisors • of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Contracts for Inspection Services with Messrs. J. M. ' Nelson and Robert G. Grady. (Building Maintenance #106-7713-511) The Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute. .- contracts, effective February 3, 1976, with Messrs. J. M. Nelson and Robert G. Grady for inspection services in connection with 2355 Stanwell Circle, Concord, said building leased by Contra Costa County for use by the Health Department. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a two and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: J. M. Nelson 1905 Pacheco Boulevard Supervisors Martinez, Ca. 9 553 iced this 3rd day of February, 1976 R. G. Grady J. R. OLSSON, Clerk 64 Collins Drive By �f Deputy Cleric Pleasant Hill, Ca. 94523 Public Works Director N. Ing_aham County Auditor-Controller Oto a4 *424 WS Ic" SZ+tclnt }ieet;fr.:: ric:;;-r:�t:�ia:�LrativcS•�rvicc:: ' �'� Cnct::t,reerLircl :'+::+rriie:t+�re 7ua:re:t,iate 1. Variri_•.en. lbe:e variables are incorporated belo:r 1►y reference: { a. Inspector's Nance & Address: J. M.Nr_LSO::, 1905 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez, California 94553 - - b. Effective 1)3te: February 3. 1976 c. Project's Name, Location, & Public Entity: Leased Building at ,2255 Staniaell Circle, Concord, Contra Costa County - d. Rate of Compensation: $12.60 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agrecmcnt hereto. COU=.QTY Or CO COSTA r By �� r 1 • Public Works birector ' Recomme:Aed for Approval: R. R. l y&, Deputy Public ff kir Director A. G. Will,, Cauaty Adnid±ttrator • - Form Approved: John B. Clausen ; County Counsel Deputy Q . 3. panties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County (County-Owaaer) aud the above-named Inspector mutually agree and promise as follows: General Qualifications & Conditions. County hereby contracts with Inspector, as one specially trained, experienced, acd competent therein, to perfor the enL-in- cering and administrative services of a construction supervisor and inspector, in- cluding those associated with the continuous construction supervision position ' commonly known as Clerk-of-the-tio:ks, in connection with the above construction pro- ject, which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the Court•,/ by architects and engineers in the design and construction supervision of corrstruct-ion projects. This agreement does not preclude_ other e=loyment of the Inspector if it does not interfere with the duties and hours of work required herein. . _ 5. Term. The duration of this contract is the duration of the said construction, project, but either party may tern nate it by giving 30 days advance urittea notice to the other. 6. General Duties & Inntructions. The ln- ;pcctor's construction supervision. and in- spection.scrvices include the lollouirg general duties and instructions: a. Stntur. Rr_lntinnrhin with Cnnntt & Archltr-et. His independent contractor relationship with the Couutiy pe-raltel-s Licit ulcich exi::ts betucen the County and the Architec_; Lut he i= subordinate to the s.re`eiitect, because the Architect is recots;iulbl.e • :or the dcsisn :+f the prosect and fcr rencrol supervision of it. conn.truction, purswent to the County-ArchitceL agrce=nt. alu Microfilmed with boord. order W105 .. -b. Stat.u-• & BeMLhtsev-1 hr utt.h C= :e ) tracter. He shell maLaLain a diCnified but ' ubderstauding relaLionr:hip with the ►r.,rkmen un the job but he shall conduct buu1ness ouly Lhrough the coaLroctor's ,job superintemxhent, and shall not assume the CoutrocLor's duties; and he shall not give lustructioas directly to the Contractor's eoployce(s) or subcontractor(s); and he shall 1=wdiately advise the Architect of any case where the County rcpr erentatives give inaLr .u:L!oz; to the Contractor's employees. e. My-v-Contractor Coardinatinn. Ile shall effectively maintain close coordina- tion of Coctracror's work and owner requirements by frequent, regular conferences or other suitable mamas, specially where projects involve alterations or modificaLions of or additions to an existing functioninG facility, which =ust be =Lntaincd as an ogcra-' ting uait during conduct of construction.w`rk, and therefore require special alertness to job conditions which may affect such contL untng operation.. He .hall coordinate accessary interruptions of normal County activities with the County sad General Con- tractor beforehand. d. Familiarity with Contract. Be shell become thoroughly familiar with all con- tract documents including specifications. drawings and addenda; and he shall supervise sad check the adequacy and aceunracy of required "as built' draviggs prepared by the Contractor's employees (see also 7-0, belm). e. Personal presence & ObactY tion. Be shall be personally present whenever work Is being perf 9 - d even on onnertime, night, holiday or weekend basis when so directed) ave: shall attend meetings called by the County, Contractor or Arehiteet; and he shall make direct personal observation. of work being performed 1W the General Contractor and subcontractor(s)-for certification to Coanty-Ouaer that such work is being performed In a skillful saner and in accordance with the regaireeents of the contract documents. f. Advice & Sua+geotions. Be shall advise County an all construction matters, such . as suggesting change orders or reviewing construction schedules; he shall evaluate sug- gestions or =difieations vbich have been made to accommodate on-the-job problems, and report them with recommendations to the Architect; and he shall reyiev and make recan- meadatioas to the Contractor on all pay estimates. 7. Saecial Duties & Instruuctions. The Inspector's duties apealkUy concerning the pro- gress of the work include the follarsing: a. Genesi RecorNo abe11 masiateia a file of, and be aware of the contents a!, the. local, States, Federal, ..�, ZPA, etc., eades, regulations, directives, requiseaeuts, etc., which are pertinent to this project, and are provided by the County; and be shall maintain a complete file of all draviagas specifications, contracts, change orders, directives, etc., which determine Work to be done by the Coietractar (ase also 64s above). b. Mary & Reports. Be Abell maintain a bound daily diary, noting therein job problems; conferences and , n11,s; and he Abell submit all reports deemed necessary by State and Federal agencies; Architect and County, Which shall be timely and in sufficient detail to satisfy the purpose of the report. . c. Mterial Records. Re shall maintain rec►•sds of materials and/or equipment delivered at the site, sheering manufacturers' maces, catalog, model serial number, style, type, or other identifying information thereon, and noting whether they are in strict compliance zith the plea.., shop drawings and/or specifications, or are alproved by the Architect. Be'shall certify to Cmnry that all materials used in construction are as specified in contract documents; and, on completion and/or installation of each applicable Item, be shall collect and asserble relevant information (including ®narantees, certifi- cates, maintenance manuals, operating instructions, keying schedules, catalog numbers ' vendors' addresses and telephone cocrmacts, ate., of materials and/or equipment as re- quired); and at the completion of the project, he shall deliver this information to the Architect for delivery to the County. 8. Pavy for Services & Re:eburgtrxnr frr brneases. a. County shall pay Inspector for these services, at the above rate, for semi- monthly pay periods of the lot through the 15th and the 16th'through the last day of time month. Payment will be rade on the 10th of the month or on the 25th of the mouth follow- ing the pay period if a demand billing is received by the County Public storks Department 6a the lost C=sty v-3rtivG day of the period. b. Mileane authorized ty the Rand C=donioner—''urveyor (PubUc Worhm Director) or his deputy shall be reimbursed at a rate to be mutually agreed upon froze time to time refleetlM actual and chanvi coats. OU06 j dr �; '�. {,f.2'r i K k�'y°f ar Ix ,+ , mss. 1. ��♦\n� �• tom,T��i��ti ,w 5. k V Io-Yr '� �'"' .-j4 K . 'n . T+forertc►raaa nay'_vark:under thf,. Coatrucfr,-;�aapect�n� ,• _sbo, I pL11 ills bun,cxncm_'c *urni�h Caii.M.Y<vtth cc11 -ru;i, catr�s o cther~nccc�S�bTc uv3�7cn ,ox :hip covcr,oRc by :k'ut��ic I.�ubllity Ii u uace Sor. u22 his r�c,t.' iia-Srertbrrafii thud I . 1. �; • ccguixc.�d;by Luis Ctintruci.. itt isu�unt., aL'_at Sea,-t 11 . ? `j4,0a) for aI2 des�Ccs ierisiao a� I�r ' ..a �� _*~'1j! . .. -- .A r 4� J--. ww --.r wr .,.. ...vi +riM cv' f'.)%',,, ~` 'r'Q2C, ! `-��� � �- • M I- i nr '7"�.3d1" � ,r 'TCU: ...=r. nzz!a� `..-q,r.d f'm+—, yJ11'll�;11 , J ;`rw.snr�tt,. 'wet,af &L �Ct1`..'�f 0 � t.- ♦, - . 11 d 4, Lai1t of �alaiclt ,.hu11 rra the xc��.pcctor aWl .trh� County Q� i^^u_�cdx - -r, . { ,�.. 1 4 .ra. (xa 3 i d r fr yY raw t� '�-.. - _ r_ l u >, ty 'w rk' ,�d Six ai X10 k brccmn�: rens ,-,Internrctat{on.4e C*�nti-oet. �M Cctuaty's 8 , �C � _ t - q e ion marc a A f A ,_ rater, e4,-ve^his'-Contract"'Zhanl be�the nCouaty_1 s Road Codas Surveyor¢(Pubs ' i� 11 rR Narks 13 ectar�;or a deputy -1 11 F f - , , j - - r"TF - jj, Ad�ustrent;oi' .0 emn.. on. x ,. r t `� 3:1C' Itl1:C Ot CO RSat�aA.1 _ 1, ad jus'�(7�b" Lic'A - consentI'll of ed .for;Goad 'cause sho�11v1:1e _ of the ties'�inv v �� 3 «?.y . r. r '� - r' �* r� 71µ e � __ I .yy — l kJ i':' S' F 3 t T`f` T,C� Ate°-_ ? .11 - 4' I ,ars_ S, a _ �Ek r ,�„ §rf , n �i� } r r rc u X S - + :r �,.� ,.,�per. �Z p t} , M �,, a' 11 P is � e '.�t� M - — �Y � � r, -I ;d s, :M b iso �" jw n f 1' ." m, 1Aqr ^ " 11 7 ��i,Z - a , , 1,1, , I ! s ..,p r�r'a�e r t 1 — i ii t r � �' t d's r"'f iii' u ,:-_�� , - - - _ _ r 1'-". t." -. r. . c r" � w e �' r sNO " �, i ! sJ�''rV•Y'pY 4" It}fCC]��Y ' - Yes J -. Y'O` fY T- F Y}� r - 4� l f `� r f�.�, F^tU �` xt .I v t >'. T 3 7 �� �ry��:. -� i A k UY- 'I L- t� r �t t .£' a �,� Y FZ,, r r S IjN4 r"� �� Y,c q 3y 1 •.t3 k3 � 7'— ,F r lky Y ^.. rk[' 41 $ r V. v =gym Y �` h, d � ; + {wM1;C% 4:,� a Y'H b �� ,L .. -,,t `' . �. b d11 ; � r 11 . -Y � ', ,�� .. ,,�_ amu_ f ak �_ 1 p rd 'i, 5 -3 �r � �� a ,t 4"' r A..� f i a 7 �. -� f4 d aLs- a _ e[^ - '{:Atty�� d•�;e.�t j � -1 .Sfr yY�p3�' J�i Sr , ,,;'�,''4 g t ,,�3'r11 -j l ?Y �' - . it l 4 �V '.k'. `r� �'- # Zy„+�`:�"y >sr'� •"��, a 7 .:_'c' � -..i r 17 3" g +r'.ta�3tt _ �k �' �'. '.'++� ,,, r�'fl°rf� S1.IS !1•�, l I ,,. f bash(tl �. �r , ,r . duI'iu� pili ��� o . �, ,o v ,e� 111�r�F�.l'.11 �� �� .. L, i EI r.W. r�, �„ y�1et :li i:;ll;i�.i• i ... � ..:�in�:::t:et::c .' S t . �; Cepa•:l.rett'tirel :'e::• �t-vi:t:•u :: iera.•-rl.fe��t 1. ,V:era12-:c:;. lllere vttriaUcs are incorporated L-cl.o:r by rcfcrcucc:. a. Ynslscctor's I:ame •.- AtUress: POI t-RT G rMATIV. 64 cal1 ;ng Drive. Pleasint Hill.,California ' b. Effective Date: February 3. 1976 c. Project's 3:atne, Incation, & Fublic Entity: Leased Buildinft -It 2155 Stancaell Circle, Concord, Contra Costa County d. Raise of Compensation: $11.85 per -hour . 2. Si_rnatures. Sbese signatures attest the parties' ogreca:;nt hereto. - COLI=.:TY Or-C/NTRA COSTA I1!SPF.CTOit Y G. GRADY Public Ztorks bircctor Reco=ended for Approval: 41 R. 3•i. Ry&, Deputy Pubi4 u6rks Dictor A. G. Will., puaty Admi ris rr - Ftr= Approved: �Jobn p. Clausen CountyCounsel - Ae Depu y 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County (County-Owner) and the above-named Irzpecxor =tually agree and promise as follows: 4. General Qualifications & Conditions. County hereby contracts with Inspector, as one specially trained, experienced, and competent therein, to perforce the enzin- cering and administrative services of a construction supervisor and inspector, in- eluding those associated .i+..h the continu us construction. supervision position ` commonly %noun as Cler2:-of-the-Storks, in connection with the above coastruction.pro- jeet, which services are necessarily incident to the services performed for the County by architects and engineers in the design and construction supervision of construction projects. This agreement docs not preclude other employment of the Inspector if it does not interfere kith the duties and hours of work required herein. Term. The duration of this contract is the duration of the said construction project, but either party may terminate it by giving 30 (lays advance written notice to the other. 6. General. Dutics & Instntction:. The Inspector's construction supervision and in- spection services include the iolloving general duties and instructions: a. Status tc Relntinn-hln utth Cot.nty Fc krchttect. His fndcpnndent contractor relationship uiut the CuunLy parallels that uhicit r:.i::L:: betucen the County ami tits Architec_; Lut he is subordinate to the Architect, bccau:;e the Architect i:: recp�j:t:;ibl.e • for the cc.:ytt of the project n:td for Gencrul :uperrision of its cobs(ruction, litir:;uant to the County-Architect A;;rcecaenL. Microfilmed with board order x - 00108 -1 b. Vfat.u•• - 3:, 1 !• .• +::t• u;'k C -•'rart.,,.. M.6 :l:al3 =LnLnin u d1J;nit1cd but utnlerstanditr; rtlatinta:lails villa t-he woriz n on the Job LaL use rJadl. conduct butslae so oufy thsruul h Uta cvntractur's dub superiat o:eoL, awl *hall not a sum a the CoutrucLur's •dutleaf and he ::hall noL Ctve InAructlonr directly to the Contractor':: caployce(a) or aiubcontractor(a); and he :tail iu:mediately advise the Architect of any co.:e allure the "County repret:entativen Give itwiructto= to the Contractor's: employees. e. n&v-Contract-r Cnerdttatt-at. No shall effectively maintain close coordLus- tion of Mau-Actor's wort mod owner rrqutrmenta by fr;etluent, regular conferences or other suitable minas, :peclally where prgJecLG involve alterations or traditicatiogu: of or additioaa to an exictind iunct:ioaiaG facility, wbb* not be a=Iatained an an opera- ting unit during coaluct of cotmtructira.wort, sad thxrefore regpire special alertness. . to job conditions iddcb mu7 affect such coattautag operations. He shall coordinate necessary interruptions of normal County activities with the County and General Con- tractor beforehand. d. Fbr,1t!1arM vtth C`otroct. Be shall become thorouughly familiar with all con- tract documents Including s.-peciiications, drawlgp and addenda; and be oball supervise and check the adequacy and accuracy of required "as built' drawitigs prepared by the Contractor's employees (see also T-a, belay). e. Personal Presence & abseryntion. Be shall be personatiy present fhenever work In betas Ferf even on orcrtime, ai&t= holiday or veakend basis viten so.directed) and shall attend aeetlap called by the County, Contractor or Architect; and he shall Awe direct personal. obsesvatious of work being performed by the General Contractor - and snbeontractar(s)=tar certification to County-Owner that such vwk is being performed In a skillful carne; and in accordance with the requirements of the contract documents. • f. *Advice & Suewations. Be sal advise County on all construction matters, such as suggesting change orders or reviewing oomrtrumetion sebedules; be shall evaluate mug-• ipstions or =d1f1caUoas v Buds have been cede to on-the-job problems, and, report toes Keith reeom:muffations to the Architect; and be shall review and now reccm- mendatioas to the Contractor on all pay estimates. . .T. Special Duties Instructions. She Inspector's duties specially concerning the Sm- gress of The worts include the toll�oaing: . a. 'General Aeggd_ h lra. Ba doll maintain a lila of, and be aware of the contests e, the. Ick--al-8 State, M decal, Di"SQ, MPA, tte., codes, regulstioas, directivas, requirements, etc., which are pertinent to this project, and are provided by the County; and be shall maintain a ca plete fife of all dmilags, specifications, contracts, cban8ee orders, directives, etc., which determine work to be dons, by the Cohtractor (race also 6-d,"above). b. Diary & Henorts. Be shall maintain a bound daily diary, noting therein job problems; conferences and reearks; and be sball submit all reports Aeon" necessary by State and Federal ageaciet', Architect and County, which shall be timely and in sufficient detail to satisfy the purpose of the report. . e. Material Rteords. Be :ball aainto"a records of Materials and/or eepdptoeat delivered at the site, showing mamdacturers' names, catalog, mcdal serial nuobar, style, type, or allm Identityleg information thereon, and noting wbetber tbey are in strict compliance Pith the plan:, shop dreviogs and/or specifications, or are approved by the AzeUtect. tie"M all certify to County that all. materiels used in coostructign are as specified in contract documents; and, on Coco' t1w and/or installation of each applicable Items-he shall collect and assecbla relevant iatornation (IW34106 guarantees, certiti- . cater, maintenance coma' . operating ImMuctions, keying scbadalbs, catalog atmbers vendors' addresses and telephone coca.acts, etc., of noterials and/or egaipoent as re- quired); and at the emoletion of the project, he shell deliver this iofmpg sat r = to the Architect for delivery to the Count,;►. . 8. , Pay for Sprviecs & W.1aburscment f_r EMases. • a. County .hall pay Inspector for these services, at the above rate, for aemi- tmoothltijt pqy periods of the 1st through the 15tb and the 16tb-4hrmgft the last day of the months. Payment will be made on the 10th of the =nth or on the 25th of the month follow Ing the pay period it a demand biiliac in received by the County Public Works DeparLocat on the last•t."aunty w-trkigs day of the period. b. Mileage authorized by the Band CoasaLssioner-Surveyor (Public Works Dtrector) or his deputy zha4 be reinburced at a raLe to be zuLu ally agreed upon trans time to Una reflectltm actual and chnrtgina cart.. 00109 �. ..-. c;,x*� ;';s•U reforc prrA#I - , scorl►I uex3t� tits , Lrceeai, Ic::.pcc , 1 it.�.t a �?�'e� " ct�t #tct' fic ..s M'r: !-s; cr.;r `!ur►tF:at CounL,�c` :it»c cer:3'f.ir�ttc. err nthar rccccRpf.•ct,Tc c�Fdr•cccr� �� x± ot.3his cyt�vCc'ut;r : cir llcl�l.ic I.ivbllity 1c%u acs e; for oJI d's gk Sc c e l:►�cx[ag ttun clttC�e;. z ri:Quu�-d Ly:t1sl:: CvuLrucL, in cu�uaL. �t iuL`1cn:.f, ;�",;t3 (h?� to �i3f Jsc-I 7,�4c ' urs:f u�; ci LJ�i'4 t- �f .1S 1.� :a•.i • i,r.w +. d�.w•t. 2.► w..w www wi++..�ww ww.7' IFri( },. d < ' A. wR••a.a ♦ ... .�..,, ...,., ...r...... .•. ..� '---.... .,,, �1IV�=r.t�r �'u 1•; 'M AArA l� '«"'' r �'CCie .�.... 1 ... . - »�,».... *�1 t• •w=-.►�. lSh �•�.x * 1�A} w T.s.• «wt�• r' ....,A,�. ?�Jw+. w—Cjc,.,LS�•i, 2 �•'�"0,1..M�-�.<.y...0 :! • {p..:'�'j ,., I 0. /��,.�..11"L. �j.�,.r.` �s,....c' Q �1t.;� �1..' i ,'�.f*}.`.tt'1 %tJ 7x J,In ii-�� � 11 �.�� ��1�•�+• ~���f� .•MM iR '.,��M j1.�.wi•s� i••il!* � i� �R}R.M� y . .•irr WR ��♦ �� f� I.Rnd } ?� P 10. Fnlnr6r.igin+. sect►? ?Cn %.n m4--n:son Of �;r.-r►�:. The CounLs1.'s h err -fex cce arcinS and '. itci crpretii; 'thi Coutr+nct shall be thr Coaaty's Iiaa<I;Coc¢�issioocz Sw�wcyor (Eub c 1,'orlw UirecfaarI or;a ,deputy. 1�11t-�y R 4wt + �'il- ` -- 11. �iu�xe aL of c^ aer=ati aa. 3hc rate of.co#<peo.ntioa be adJusted;'*' �u c 2 ; i ._ "�11 - 1 .` coasent 'ot tihc parties involved for 6c cause shoxa. `#" RG I-Iu, ?J , , V �. �1 I'll:3. s "-, , 3 . f .1. , � 4, ,h � �µ il .1 I '< � a f }r11 « J'%J ' a n . I 111. io. s y •11 fi tea.:,y S " 3 n f F t 1 y 5 I'll � ' Arlr .�+ r^� x�- L � " 9� 71 I� '. r ", " ' } r, s I x,t � ' ✓ . �tl a rr- �r w j h � ..4 a r �L� rt*9 '.� ` t 4"";- 1,N �a .d.�, r� 1 sY } ai ter."}.4+ y r� p< nkks'i€ #f fi # s,��{�_ y q F `,Sb ,+. i jpQq. Yy a '"� ." a J 'ice «' X �' f. fir, x 3- rX x 11 . . „5 . Y kf Y E .tTM .�r 3'rx ti ,.,.^. '`, 'u „r 'A�77 s� ti -gl '..,+ .�....#�yv, a ri.N ,,- ..i`e'd'j'' f YrF„ ;ewpyrxx.T.. s f•^• .9a+s' .. ..# w� i I Y _ in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 +'19 76 In the Matter of Completion of Construction of Sidewalks in Minor Subdivision 33-73, Crockett area. As recommended by the Public Works Director, THE BOARD t DECLARES that the construction of sidewalks in Minor Subdivision 33-73, Crockett area, complete, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund to Mr. John G. Ivancich the $267.80 cash deposited as surety (as evidenced by Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 111446, dated October 1, 1973). PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. i F - •1 1 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. { cc: Recorder Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of -- Supervisors � Mr. John G. Ivancich affixed this 3rd d February P. 0. Box 29 ay of . 19 76 Challenge, Ca. 95925 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public =forks Director B Deputy Clerk Director of Plar�ir�; Rondalyin Shack s County Auditor Controller o0�11 H 24 8175 10V f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 T6 In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deed. (Work Order 4805, Road #3381) The Board ACCEPTS a Grant Deed dated January 19, 1976 from 0. L. Willis, et al., required for road purposes as a condition of approval of Land Use Permit 312-72, Howe Road, Martinez area. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the %reBoinp is a true and coned ropy of an order entered on the nunutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supwww" Public Works Director affixed this 3rd of February . 1976 County Assessor -- Director of Planning I R. OLSSON, Clerk By - . 0*" Clark N. 1 aham� 001,12 H 24 W75 IOM f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 1976 In the Matter of Acceptance of Offer of Dedication for Recording Only. (Subdivision M S 81-75 San Ramon Area) The Board ACCEPTS for drainage purposes the Offer of Dedication dated December 8, 1975 from Leadership Housing Systems, Inc. (required as a condition of approval for Subdivision M S 81-75, San Ramon Area). PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order ordered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dale aforesaid. cc: Recorder (via P.W. ) Wftow 'y hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director supervkors Director of Planning affixed this 3rd day of February 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Oeputy Cleric N. Irj&aham Qol3' H 24 W75 IoM f: In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 1976 In the Matter of Acceptance of Relinquishment of Abutter's Rights. (Subdivision M S 81-75 San Ramon Area) The Board ACCEPTS the following Relinquishments of Abutter's Rights required as a condition of approval for Subdivision M S 81-75, San Ramon area: Grantor Date Leadership Housing Systems, Inc. December 8, 1975 Gordon H. Ball, Inc. December 8, 1975 PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby oartify that the foregoing is o true and corns cW of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director M/Mess my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisor: County Assessor affixed this 3rd day of February, 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk N. Iikraham 00114 HK SOS ION In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19'76 In the Mattel of Consulting Services Agreement with National Air Balance Company of San Francisco, Inc. (Work Order 5313) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with National Air Balancing Company of San Francisco, Inc. for balancing of the entire heating and air conditioning system for the County Courthouse, said agreement providing for payment to a maximum amount of $2,400 on an as-earned basis, which amount may not be exceeded without further authorization by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a tno and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of sold Boord of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: National Air Balance Company of San Francisco, Inc. pend affixed this 3rd February ig76 1485 Bayshore Boulevard San Francisco, California J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director By. , Do" Clerk County Auditor-Controller N. InIffraham (via Public Works) 00115 H 24 BPS 1011 �+ 1 } l 1 �IY l 2 Z 11. 11it�.�V t t "+�; 1.'�'G*.a r� 'y; N Asst e4 .e': �../MSPIll gin. $ Ski 7N A r++ ++..n+.r+.+ .wry-r+.e ++e*e w�+s..:,:.+�+.w�a ` t�«w'� C• , S ,�," Ji ,�a* 1� i, �• d I6 a, t!'�' �� ~Gtics<l�Lli1t1 slit:Nt`. .1 ♦4' Wl.i��ti1Gt i« 113`!: " i M ;�� , n"I " b. - x c»at ...�ui.:ru tr2cstr 1nit�s. tr , /tsb '& .. r 11 ✓ ,(a) lit.`liC AL►caC.ti�: COFC'1'RA COSTA' C; � ,; .11 y X. ".....� ., : - 11 I -lvx&wRi�� -.r (L� Can soltuatx Lotw S:Addres.: National Air Batance Co o S F Inc ",;'. " * , }*�, t r ,� 11- R ' `'' < u L-ei % ��;-,-A X485. shore,=$onlevaird San.Francisco' 'Czlforntia .'3 .r .. , w , 1. µ i .• :"� t «v (c Ufactive Mmte: January 10; 1976 4 �t 1-1 11:1County,,;Cou�thou0,0 Remodel x n f,d,.a. ... _ �11 ,!I vj"6%ject .r4slic,1. Fue cr,11 - tocatioa: 1�Iartine Cal ors 3� �� z a CWS a ,#531 ( ). yucat Limit: $2.40000Xwr , KMI ek I'll 11 x - r r ' ' 3, t -2. Sinaiures Thrse.signatures attest'the partiett R agzeemeat berets � s= t:►7I+IuUL1. k r • xg Y `- aJ . 4 s rs � ves> nate tial. capaacity 1 bus£aess ,F : 'Xt�ll "s �a.,ate 01'. �.1ioIt,rT13.a1. � i`" j�. .Jr�� /1{� /1���/� /y� , a� � ,Caatra Cbata 'W.4«« y ) (W ��,�«�,e15w r �e person signing,above for Consultant,, knows to nae iii thoseh it�diiriauab ana."'`7°,, x basisess capac�tics,.Persoanl7�T..appeared Lcforc me today pec ackna�rledged tliut�Il m he3gad 1t aa3 that the,corpo�tioa'.ar pertaerslp uar abaveexecute�thc,-r . �-11ws � . x { � tirithin 3�strument pursunat to its.by-laws= or a ren:olcitioa tib"Baxdo �.� :,,_.. . .- oZDirectors 'Mate 11 - ,: a,. ,., �.. .• ..... a a . a. /_ laV � t;.y'�`"xa� a4 � « 51G�.E: r� a' r '^+r" go I , . �1.;,;AtlROEtA S P,t� � I ��L.V& (sem)' o11, TaRtt-pile�lL�CWF0RN p auk*r�saaaw�ca iiaa i .I I ,PUBLIC :�� r® ice+ �," ., f [ #sd'ms's ;'zi _,spyr _ 'afx ,?�naP,7�7�" ii-s � r•�' if2ctOr �' Stilxer FQ ApP80VRt? _ �r 3.1+.�ale rs soba B. Clausen, CcnntY Cocoe2 t I 11rI'll l,i,6iJtl1 , +. r A�" r � , Vl 2 AU4 * 11, s11 I .. + l.,l ,,y,,,. �i"'+.an8,^,,"+�' r k tr '+- ,`F 3e�' "w' ,�`r^1-1� ."�J "f3.� .,Parties• =ectivle oa the abov. 111'e date,:the tibon►e=awed .fi'abXf Agency ane Carisce:t$ � ,If�� Li�tlnil�►^agr11�e1.e Bad;pi W�i�se `� . vY./^M•I 11I 4 -', �' , • t 43 Y , . �CI�O. merit. �3tb1�.0 AgC�/ �lC'reb�i COasa�.t8a�, 8p� L'Oa41i�tLZ�a�8CC�si.m � i�� tccg3oymeat to pentons the;professioa�al..s+ertrilces:described herein, upaai`, , erl and :i . x "t Itllucoils deratioa of the payoeats stated herein., -* , + �' `."i ..., } , I x x � '� s 1, 1o! -Service. Scope of .service.sbsl3 be as described, fa„Agpead c A attschecfifi , `�* �6. Znsumgce ,e Cannsul tact"48�8�1, eweI'll74l, t M u at oa ase to Petb2ic AgcncY, ' nai cI .1rate 10 s�ar �other cevideace acceptable to Public Agency Qt (a) public 13al. ins rs: o lea h I'll Iar � n, fl Q30 for a13. Qa�'ilres =arising.Out Ot.bodi]y, iajurics .Or x t0 a�Ong`person a a I! w 1. fi 3cast `Q� -,o- ts�o or_;more peacsoas, in Mw ogee,arc ent ar ocemcreace;' ankh (b} v,o dsma� 3Ubi.Uty iasuraace pro id ng tor.a limit a ; not less<thaw SQ�Q©Q:4 z;ty days��na ccs flotw� � �w ,pah cy ,lapim cancellation is .required. t �, x s ¢ 3 ', fP, '�. Pn eat Ptib11C AQeARY .tit ll. ]?�y COQStatuat tot prO�Cs3iQa 8c MCC'. pex�axAtCt 8t t�1 motes shaua q.�a Appendaac`B,attached,hereto, vhfeh iaac2ucic al]� cnreach�ead��ar��iucideaEi: F ec�ensn poi rich no ,Wditional -compensation :ba12 beLi I.ullozll-,ed. Ia ao°creat sht� the�tatat , =U d the L`ous1.ultaat'exceed.the payment limit sacci ficd ilz pec ` 1%(e} without p ow,wry a p tpp v31 0 the"Coate tea t, .County Pum1.ic ewts D ector _lLCoaWat_, ". s ate a R a chax�c ,vain l,be submdt'.F_111,at comreaieat iatervn]s. -Phyma t *3'i tae d �tthia t x(3pxd � ft-e t rof;,cacb„atnten�n:at, I. fi Y'r '¢T s� x; 5 ��# • ',^ � o y -1111�til 1 ,& I , nation. At ifs ,option, pUbltc A,�;eaoy.maywt�crartnuts tbta a eemeni t,tr�amy� ' V »by. rxi t�.c o notice to;`the ;Consult unt, whether' o not not; the-Caaaui""4t-i. it: default Upu , rice ` q It � Lt. t . inatiorc, Con. I 11at agrees .tan turn over t4 Public Itgcnay ,crrerngpertfirnin tor,11#thy , Ai6ik o.sessed'by i�J�4 . lustier bin. coat_*+u2 L that time, arKL:t.'_, Uc� En d, t thoctt dcsplica k i 3.ioa 'zil1, amounts due or thereafter Uccming due on account aZ se cc. zendcred tis thick dtkn �11o11�- f ter1 . %iitinUoa.1� ��`��; ,. � I< ;Arf ,ctx " 3l:c Can.ult:aat is ccs independent, cantrnctar, and i:r1 11-, tua►t to be cocz..Edered tear'; :ecxj-4lo,�Cc cif a'l.c"C .A4Ccnc-L Iy ~` #, I 30 ,' 1ctclvjt W 1 cut lon. . aha C,ncu ul Utn�, ahA]l dhicnxfi, rcnrc, itxfi tt.l fy a r►ar = hct2cfi ht12 ii �"fS � `�� 3'lil�liic t;�`:t+' ..rl;tl►t x#.:1 cr?f cf-- tlr4ti .,f..lsla3sccr: ,fry t�s>y:ulrfi u � nl l.,i»t�;JufarK arm,, in; u t � ; (ir ;�11 59(.C;. tltt`,�..=w�.11�++ �''i %j",4. .Mn(lY>ICt,(4 'ttUII )xt!,:"•t:Tt'L' C/".'o,,3Ltl" �R t' }1 If�11141C-4'3"« ..5 d I 1, II I �ttt1C � ', qia s n & t ra yi�l'i i1A pi�ll�, is t�\��('1I�� �a II�U p�!I�II nk,`, ro'E:.sy :r4r il� -.'ir i.. I - �•2 ,u� :g i (';I rci A.i,w u.�ini d�il� �q�a 1 ��li tin, a^ c,.. ,� I Ip �R :I "fin r - ti h '�� i io �r(� fi N � ,, .-`��m"v'x`,°. :h . ... !� �I�A .II, ,1PG: 1P .i s :.., _��r"`;e�` !�^�': '•, ! -ars I , , I c .wry, AP PEND I X A The Scope of this Work is to balance the entire existing heating and air conditioning system and the entire nevi _ system installed for the new courtrooms on the second floor of the County Courthouse, as called for in the _ plans and specifications for the Courthouse Remodel project. gpPENDIX A i . 001 .'7 i �• .. Atli•KVo.NfNtcs souip ONABCOU DALAV[ A6EtKVNATIONAL AIR $ALANCE CO., Qf SAVFRANCISCO, INC. 1485 BAYSMORE BOULEYARO.SAK FXAft 1SCo_CAUFO Kt^94124 (415) 467-846.: D�C 1 ;;1935 UBu� WpRi�'S DfpART 12/1:6/75 P Contra Costa Co. public Works Dept. 6th Flr. Admin Bldg. Martinez, Ca. Attn: Mr. John W. Harkin Re: Court House Remodel Test 4 Balance Dear Sir: We propose to furnish labor, instrt=ents and reports required to perform the Test & Balance of the remodeled systems at the above location. The work to be done as per dwgs. H1-H6 dated 2/5/74 and according to AABC balance standards. The work to be done on a time basis :with labor invoiced at $28.00 not to exceed $2400.00, based on the above drawings. Sincerely, Glenn Carter, T.S.E. General Manager GC:aa o E : r _ L L.... u fy/a PLIASUC ViVM BUILDING Ml,:-.%K V4M 00118 � NATAGNAL if E.MPE.. Or THF %:P$1:.Af:yi.COEtT;C��.. C.;itTT1111f k j e In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court Number 40905) at work Training Program, Inc., Santa Barbara, California, at a rate of $596.00 per month effective February 4, 1976 PASSED by the Board. on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dole aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director, Human Resources Agency supe Social Service Attn: N. Hallgren affixed this 3rd day of February, 19 76 County Auditor-Controller ,�; J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By. - , / Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 - 15-M Mary, rai g 00119 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February. 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Fee-for-Service Contract and/or Novation Agreements with Physicians, Dentists, Optometrists and Podiatrists Utilized by the County Medical Services and County Health Department IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Contract and/or Novation Agreements - for those fee-for-service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the County Health Department whose names are listed below are hereby APPROVED, implementing Resolution No. 75/844. Name Number Effective Date Rate Wesley L. King, M.D. 26-751 December 10, 1975 $19.20 hourly IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to sign the Contracts and/or Novation Agreements on behalf of this Board. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 County Counsel _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller 11 By Deputy Clerk H 24 12171 - 1542 Miry Cr County Medical Director Chief, Medical Administrative Services County Health Officer Personnel Services Unit Employee Relations Officer Contractor rJ ♦ i i I t 0NNNM_, W r � w • Numb L t I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February 19 76 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By Deputy Clerk H 24 12114 - 15V firry Cr County Medical Director Chief, Medical Administrative Services County Health Officer Personnel Services Unit Employee Relations Officer Contractor t~ t • + r, i As specified in Paragraph S of the Agreeaant foi w entered into with the County of Coat or Profess ,o ai�Services caucelra Costa, hereby r o idtion of said contract effective midnight irm2diate Contractor Witnessed by t Y i M •.Ctt1~1,.,:..T FOR 1 :Urr.:;5IO..,1L .,;.:..1.._S Contract Paid Physician s (Contra Costa CozutLy Human Resources Ageccy) I?umber [ .� 1• Partivs. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below--naamed Contractor mutually agree and promise as follo--s: 2. Variahles. u. Contractor (name) Wesley L. King, N.D. (address) 8.140 San Si=eon, Concord, CA 94518 Phone b. Attending Physician { ) Psychiatrist ( ) Podiatrist ( ) Physician/Rasident ( ) Detiiti:t ( ) Optometrist O Ortisodontisc ( ) c. Effective Date December 10, 3975 d. Method of Payment (Board Resolution No. 75/844 ). Check appropriate box: Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. it:-,e: $ 19.20 per hour [ 1 Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. _ Rate: $ per month. For sen►i.:W reade-red as requested, a&i scheduled and approvers by County, in addition to those normallry and additionally scheduled and required as specified in 4. Services, County will pay Contractor $ per hour in addition to monthly rate. e. Anesthesia Services: Contractor agrees to perform alesthesia services to be compensated as set forth in Board Resolution No. 75/ 843. Agreement i=ludes availability for Anesthesia Services: [ j Yes [ j NO 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Hedical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2.fl, pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451 4.' Services. Contractor shall render the services specified in 2.b. above, including all services normally and customarily connected therewith, including on-call services, and such additional services as are required, at tire's and locations specified by the C;ed ical Director o, Health Officer. Tile aforenamed shall proviie Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates, in cases of emernency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer ray wake such changes is the dety schedule as are required. The Ccunzy shall not change assigned duties without counuLtstion and agreement of the Coutractur. For purpeses of this Agreement, the Medical Director :incl/or Health Officer are authorized to act on behalf of the County. S. Terra. The tern of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated in Sr.+•: •i 2.c. throu,nh (1ctaljer 31 , 1976, but it nay be cancelled izzpc:diately by =utual connert, or by either pnrtz, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. G. I•Ind i f is a k »►a a:u? Tlci_ Cun►rave. tent bc- "A- if ied and/or extended by Of t1ke Counry and t1j. Cvnt►actot -nul approved by the Board. 00142 Microfilmed with board order Uu:nber f 1. ha�•r��•:�s- i:::e�1 r:vntl: t.ii.• prcwsri Lz,I b • C«rtt tactor n1e:ill r the CUc'at3, clearly lean 'hvoire tP:e Count Y MI'r'cff}inE Yin t1►c form v;�o:� 1,,o::� - services rendered Ilea i L!� 0 =2g of each 1+1:•01ce a"d a p to tljc Couhty. •firmer, the Covst�• s11-211 F. roial by tine County"�Y �,.nrr Y Medical Dircctnr n�- tired, ane ,uz� otherwise req t Y vath a sctnerUU1 - �'1 r -•c;enc• or wl:cry= .t schedule as pr Contractor in cases p. s is the do Y Y of ecae.- ;r ,ffective dates. tal. k` such cha��e,� without coca:•.=ltstion of the. ?ic:cltr Of€icer ch��c'-r>�:inncd ..c..z_s �t� the 'fedical Medical Director or For purposes of this Agcecs►c- uir+ed. The Ccunt. shall not act on behalf of the County- arc req he C,�:rt:actor. are authariz�'d to �s indicated and agrc4ra:nt of t. ` r• date, a Director ::rte:/�"r 1}calt}r Officer its effective edia,tely by �rcement shall be frog be cance•llZd ice' 2976• w1•' r notice The term of Lh1S 0.- ht:t it 1 - :"a"ce r.-ritt n S. T.� thrurt'•h Lt:tc3her 31 , b gir:rf, 3`J d::y.' y mutual coir cent or Ly citl:cr 1 the other. aciiEiris and/or eytecrded by ;rerecrf to y bey ^eard. t t�a'.rs�E r�.r, ., roved by tics: p E ic,t► ::,?,r:u_ 7';;� � i.�ci. rTlei t":f the Ct�rrt:arc Loi azul approved C". 2Snt1 i �r r t lie' 4srrnn y 441 MicresfijMFwj with board order son —Now .. . Number 7. vav;, .:it. i~:,c:lc 2strntlr tlr.= Contractor ..hall .nvoicc tt:e County in the form prcescrjbJ by the Cuttnzs, clearly :specifying service!; rendered to the County. Upon of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or llc:3 tb 01-(icer, the County shall pay Contractor: a. if hourly paid, at the: rate indicated in Section 2.d. for each hour approved; or b. if monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2.d. or pro-rata amount for said approved period, or for additional services, at the per hour rate. S. rlilearo Rel--bursemenr. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according, to Ordinance Coale, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the perfor--once of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted aanthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. ReSulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations, procedures and byla::s for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security Taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. " 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies, and non-profit medical corporations. 12. Insurance. If obtainable at a reasonable cost, County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance including professional malpractice liability as provided in the policy No. CL 299845 issued by Providence Washington Insurance Group to the County and in effect on October 1, 1975 with limits of $500,000 per person and $1,000,000 peer ncrurrence and umbrella► lizb-4 .i in=ranca policy No. 4173-5674 issued by the Insurance Compacey of the State of Pennsylvania with a limit of $5,000,000 each occurrence/annual aggregate to the County and in effect on October 1, 1975 covering both the contractor and the County under this agreement. The County shall have sole and absolute discretion to determine whether the cost of obtaining such policy or policies of insurance is reasonable. If the County determines that liability insurance, including professional malpractice insurance, or malpractice insurance only, is not obtainable at a reasonable cost, the County Will become self-insured (Govt. C.§990.4) and will cover contractor's liability to the same extent as covered in policies Kos. CL 299845 and 4173-5674 issued by the above named Insurance Companies to the County and in effect as of October 1, 1975 not to exceed $5,000,000 including any umbrella coverage, which the County may be able to obtain, insofar as permitted by the Constitution and Statutes of the State of California.. 1.3. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder without the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. . COUNTI• COITR.ACTOR BY— Q.a yCherDesignee Director, Human Resources agency Dated: ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the ln:.rd B Ucputy la:C�`3�ll:f.n1:D 1'01: APPROVAL: 00inq modical Direc!or "4r 1::.i2;lr Of!Icor f 4 F In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Use of Conference Room by the U.S.C. Graduate School The County Administrator having notified the Board of the request of the U.S.C. Graduate School for use of one conference room at the Probation Office at 2525 Stanwell Drive, Concord, for a class in Correctional Administration during the period February through May, 1976; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that use of space is AUTHORIZED subject to the condition that no additional costs will be incurred by the County. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator � Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of P cc: Public Works Director affixed this 3rd day of February 1976 Buildings & Grounds �. r J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Probation Officer (2) By ��, < ��L. . Deputy Clerk U.S.C. Graduate School Mar ' Craig% c/o Probation Officer H 24 anS low 0KA4 .;.. . v...,,...r.,.., q.r gy. 'F.143@.,:,4n:>�,'. ,R►F'm:'xt+TRi'SQ .�,x ...., .. Y{� i --------------- in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 _. i9 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Settlement of Contra Costa County v. Orland Davis, et al. Upon recommendation of the County Administrator and County Counsel, it is hereby ordered that the County Counsel is authorized to stipulate to settlement of Contra Costa County v. Orland Davis, et al., Superior Court No. 137782, by entry of judgment for the County in the amount of $9,000 plus 7p interest, secured by a note and first mortgage on the real property located at 6273 Arlington. Boulevard, Richmond, California., PASSED by the Hoard on February 3, 1976. I hereby comfy that the foregoing is a true and purred copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Counsel Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 3rd day of February , ig 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By i Deputy Clerk Maxine M. NeufAld M 24 S/71 -12.500 GA:3:s 005 in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California February 3 . f9 JL In the Matter of Authorizing County Medical Services to provide meals to the Central County Meals on Wheels Program IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that County Medical Services is AUTHORIZED to provide meals to the Central County Meals on Wheels Program at a cost of $1.40 per meal with payment to be made to County through 'Order to Invoice." Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 I hereby certify that the fon"p*p is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of soil Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: HRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supervisors affixed this 3rd day of February tq 76 cc: County Administrator � . County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Medical Services By �/� Deputy Clerk County Social Services Mary raig Meals on Wheels Coordinator c/o HRA 0 .LFr6 H24 8/75 IOM s � In the Board of Supervisors of f Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 1976- In 1976-In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Head Start Grant, Office of Economic Opportunity IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the 1976 Head Start Granit (No. H-0375) in the amount of $459,994 is ACCEPTED from the U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: OEO Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of `uPervisms cc: Head Startc/o OEO affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 Auditor-Controller Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Maxine M. N&Lffild H 24 8/75 IOM 9 1rAo i d l f I t - L r aj AL cc co u 6) Igg 00 IL o ftg ! 1f AL Z O' a CN v. ap G w 3 _ L6 w 2Y o Y 1► Y z "� ti f G1 (Olz O C t\to cn • Ch W r-- C u L, C% Y U < s u Q � a V CA V C Imo C kms _° ru: U, o � � sem. I � v' c id .; — r C� C:16 ob LL ti giLj -C INC* _ -L _O �.► ac C,J O Q • oko 00 C14 ej C O y - • L Cl Q, v .Z tt C Q �C n < J o e-`1 x sIL 2 t < 4 a s "3 Ln rn w Q O C I- to C ,� a. < c o 4wcc " a79 V < r j U a► » LU 31- t. V f Y �+ = u im O lid i -C CAD U4 0 ti a w i:1 O 4 C H CJ C:k 4cl C .Y. 4 Y Y�, C i 3t Ln a, a w C ^p a s up IL 3 tu Cat p r •a _ a "_ 4- h G o .'E'.. Y C. C K F^' Q 7 u > �: y 4 4_• 3 '� L7 L .i1 4 •Z c M {.t q w1 LU W O C i..l A- } X 0 at _ K < CJ-� W eLs�! c Cr v wit v C i i w <p y- O to o t++ ►t- -E+ v a ^� c c I O trf 4- an U< <-" "' a -r <St !1 Z e, O iC�1 CV J '7 Lt<Cr V yC y,,. N•�tOy 3 •• :� ^�_ C « t` <OC e > re ci !L2 -C a t- +J o`er o o cp ^ y ~ L 4 Gr. L- C.Q, try J UA28 t i- �� 1.,. -:.«•i a+....rt�-:..a..: ..vim - � �..- r.._ _ _ ,�, .1':._ tom.;:'...•.... { 11�9� �1.�4��a� '` 4^> &4i.ks +,x" '`i. "td %'vf � a-: :x < ",� fhn tpE u,J,qk +. {, i t z i 1�11r i} ,; { �, t? rce ''r v x ,v�,. , 31�11 ;" t,• ; �, r'£ ��<rG, w,t 7:lx tx, Y�.az.,cam t>e tf ! x'' l"{ 3 t '% t i�, "Y . u. ." '� �.., zF £ �, q, 7 S u i m Y-.J 3 a �� ^�c^r3., �.: _ k M >r ` ;'.. ��r',.di g �r7 Ald:c i"�r ,�Y� ,,."J,"I% {,DI '1{,,' „ iR �'' R j �,jxi Jk rr" r* 1 ',"x"-ym7v :.. i 1 u z 2 - s+5°' 1 ~<`k"''> S rd(...w...qn.•y. "} t z„,, - 31 s t u" ;k yx-s• .. rc#* F� z:` Y L. '��T Q . .`"'''-v >,: r #;;yi..'r#ea+.+=, . ...w+w r ,..��,� xt,' ,,R. T.1 rF"p.,� rn..- Ft r� b. - 'S ?'" # .,i ,z ,� , ' ;." 6 �` �y,.1", ;,ter'{. 'Ry .yyr 04 It .s, l� ty's ;' GP " T 3 9 - trx,' '^"` i t=i •S :.. „; 3 a .£ i/Y a.. ",.�^' 's x n y Y`'�. " ,�, i s'yrT` � ' -- i x1 } `°.y,+ ��ry..,� w.�n. `7 ♦,auas"s �'CILw."•'.�J•n►..Ai t r�'�..3'.-.r� ..0 5.'r"7t v4, b "b ,s �a,.,},� IV +y`fi 3F3 " W Ei5'*' ,, 5}: l �: d > t ,si. '�'�**iM'.a>r k'NAff'*'nR } a�n:tf Gwyw't "?1`'�" .1 4 5.� ,fio t ir.,,Y¢y. 1. 3 - k z r�r } "'s Zia ':"'�'•"�' 'K « iy A* _ s� s� "r""'. S ; ra .:5+4.. 3 iw16 C' 1,' N. a +�+ .7 N a. 'r ..+•+ K! 'Jt,y�r �..�,r w` u->i 6p ¢,'',11 . 3^✓,„, ":. a h (,4 r.� , x. qac,•., �, t �r d y: :r Yh'''i ,t vz'"' y%m -n i4. r:. nnY.4 y: aar t� u k '`�.dy ti.+h t«z f ,„. „*r L i.'t+3}-: 3+„ �L.i,7, ?a+.5 ra,.�{e'�^'s $tr",", +-3:Ii"d'�:S rt v ,'�-'.w. ',5��l,+�-�S`cr�h`='IC«.rr;...'+.ems- . c"'"""`._ p ..M.t, 3' , *�i`�,"li"" 'r'�" '"„ "'^""'. "".S!' co •4a`Mp :R a^�$�, - �% r r+ �4"m 't" , •yp .^`IIQ, .y «i,. ,++.+• ,'+�}�F 6,.�k�+�N .e..,M t i y,[�^rir 5`k" 5= 'x'a'i, ..a+'"• ," 'o 'l-, f r .k,s '•'Mw�v =-k'4 =, _E r...,�.p.�. .r.►S:..ice w+� "� A * y ,�Y> l�,.i F{ �.,f ,, ups Y't„ f �+. i '��'�""•'�. .,� .f*. fix _ I x E e. ..�.0 .. r q er ac ; va f ra:�x Jif € - t,,f ,s�"" •��...fi,y.... r^.,r^ s "�igr rt11. R ..«hi..w a r ae3,yi �r�a� '"l*F.� '�u > .: . .911 r ar t a �' _11, r 1�: n i^s+*.,2nrR,.�- d's �,� f a�. aNM,i r"� .. # t-44. '9r,r,.::. r '� ., n. + , ";:i t t�+t ,o.. .m dr. #'< wd:m ,u,^ c° bd, gtl s x hTM 4 ��^.t.�y t b ry r.v. r _',i ,,, t_ �,. .� "' !� .r -"f' r`. -- 'i+ I r !,^� ,.r��" ;�,�� ,. .nom. A. ,"; - .�r cw> ,s* +§t'11 s,rz Y Ott°' ' x 3 #' IF a``-1 �'f E N 'an,^:v.'� , ?. .,- 74� ,N `� } sy r,.; .yqX ,, r� ' 4 a 'F" Ss "�, %`a?yi -11 d 't "�'� :+....t,�� �' k, C"+tr .', s ".,1 �/+ � ,.r,3ia�s�.r-��il.'-�+ y- b�. -r�''x"',t"'r '� ,r, a,� ,*� - "_x•.rte 'h..� `n r .f + i. JrINI ^r t i:' Gs'G�'IVI� r. +.��`+ r''�y �a' ^xF,y • -r `ti. z: t � t ,, ar,rrt`Wx'v-�..,w,i,.b. 5, .Y Z t 'fxp d + �* # 22 tx a ;,fi # >" r `° ^,d z,^, r�'x �,''"�,'` t�4ti '�"c ,F ,,. , - t s i ,it °}: >'sr'�M 'z 'iL.4b •;. ` y "" g +t " -- s,:..ib, ++ ' w±u "'r'+ "R^ "r'k i.,q• tt� ''c .Gi►��yY°' trF i-''''-s i� {*- r> ., .7'C"'.p�.r`.t .. sari. 6a�..i.�+r,T,1.:i k11 S..+S'' n c.!!�...�w�.Q +.�+.,e r.""w,t;¢.v'�",` .#";..1",.� .w.i1"'a 2.'fitXt2 r 1:,y.rias Yq »,-S��1.rA.tlt►�.►. 11 5m. Yi�st;:,, �."''��.. F+ "C"'i'� 9"is`y` -^�,�r' ,tbs.,t ' �,E -L" `' is i 6 a w; s sr ": ! i y '(,` R ,{5 ';�+`Y ez> �" t �t '°` #�.-��i-..w..•s •+r•m z�" * k k�3"+ ,k s� "� "*Tt�C. � ���yd ~�rz'C✓,'�w'", {.yn."u,Ji� "C ,da'�`S "-" ;.' T z d , I T* yw -n. 7q f.,, _ t, a� a ,,.;+�+ .::t ..;• ',, a =, ,,.r t�y'a ', ';, .`-� t."r'r rr,'',€`4`�u" C a3' ". 6 - '.:#: 3+rY ati at€�11, Ps;a _4 �r.3 ,",r,,, `:", '��,..A~�. ,. m n ''n'�.' �t?';. . 4'' .s'.t« ','k{ .�ef� ''y'tiiz .nt .,,k .,.:; _ �.ys Xm v� rsvrt2♦ ala c�yY!x..,.t. z '*._ >ki' t AS',a'y�E.. ,s,i. _, , .v,f � r si.tk. - - .s+.,dwr 'Ma.a a ^, max„ '.t` y x'. F r :-i.a..�1J'rw�j g'l js ..,%Yr ,rr: W', - ' �"ts" s '""v `',,7,-� 'vr a i ,: rt�,,,,,,r tz .ic " ��, 5"? r" ',,tyn - ate,-sa*�.;•''x ,n .° ,n' >;fF'*= ,r,v . : r L f f „sc r .N:.,a ,;:r '°', } ` s � < _ sR 5- a r 4 5 ,'r'Ys '4" d #'"n 11� tt� �" Yz^ �' t ) Q I ; ` ...�..+ E N "'Z�f �' dyr,.-w' 11� 44a ."+�. 77 3 '. 'A *,x a. ""Y rut W!�'«w ..nr � r y'Er W44", } y,a a. A ,'x - x 'e n a - n .,t7 u. f Ft rpt { 11,11141M F - .7liii"`k"' - -+P. i S:,*"l k 'i M. '? 4 x`^' fit^ r�`N s'3S 2S�v '7:t � �.jx ,'.* ?�.. S �, ' 7 .�•7vi,,zF. }rt n ,[k I'll ! 7'z,.. 1 5�,1 i� -• "= ^ IAj -'Q cyogi.+.3.. rv:t j :V*'�T ,4 � v� ' `1, `k„ ,� '�"�I.1.�. .-► ,,ft .w �;+- J s `�" ' t ; f v 's,'t'S.x 9 �, `t,64 ..0 .`nye y3 °r. % - a t "''*' �„,.. : 4 .ts `f r7.* �4ax ,?t.xYY � h n y b r x k - r `1 �,.. .rte S �F i t^hi@}t`�'f. 3 ,u f"'aya" 5+^x �'} `' . 'C i�11 f �' � i--E s >^h` � t r '". t r '. u ," .* i 1�3. t e ar •.z °' 44't{.--------';. ._...�.-ass' ,.=.�. �t:a-�"�� y ' z s w . r: s x.U �+ -- iIv . I" i nn..sw.w..e�1.�+..a«ti«w++w.r er�r� n ! �L+.'f-*q fp. , , �'a pK 4', �* s g, ,- - s _ I wl.*, ,s ..s, r �. "4 ' ;S, nz ,�, d�, �?: ,-.r+ r - d� -- Ai r"c �, 'c4 ,rJ a r x h ,�. r!c .sa';sp •� RerY tea A-,'u '311, .a� "'4:,,, t., .k#arc 3 s +Y t v? s-t^y �r .�' e "* c zr. "'',f Rr... �` a7*� '�YSK ry,..; ,.+->i`..t�4,s �' " ,.ly �'rf i�ww T.R�i'471+"Ttes"s (.:x# ,,'i`',�,`t-fir.. c'SG ,al �', �^�, s,.`rz}„etC� ,. ` r "' " V el.ssr�_.4"ft ' ow.4 `•. 4 � f ja+t:. w n M¢t.. r.."�h "'45�: , ^'` ,,�: `S41 1 v.bp`^titi 't.s'; i ! �i E s r., ;+t j '' 1•'^5 *tib k' '3 ,f`s. �n>rJ '"y k� g. ` - -_ l 'S #-,k"F�r 4. a a u.i^" t r �i� fiv +SE' "u'rMANS `f zr �' � �M,tuv3�-P*s ° t `v f s9 v a...i¢ >f�jr,.,,.'"Z r.:1 'IVI(��.�►"�" ca�4`ro a .+z�i ,ta �,�11" „s, ,�..,: 7 s ",z;. z:: �,r v ..w.�rwL`..r r �y. ° ^.R .:;�, a *.wt !t - �� ,rt++^-x � 't y 'y rw ,f<Pkn.�i��l� ._. �"Y ,",,,. rc'+ 8� +� f� :r c� t� '' F _ w w, 'y,`k. 1 �'rrK4 r Y +Ir'' r t v�` q 3� J �� Y` a.';, 1P'n rL r fart ` ` ,:.;„"»�.x..�11.1'`. 1 �, v e s s"' 111 �,-.: �`$y+�* „`'1 � .a? # '� � .a � ' +a+E'-a . x^ ,7 .. -. r aero x^ "4�ow y «1-11 m �t�srs i4 ' 'li!"cs.+e+.T+Z..+h.w++►s«e...i.A,.i Iw.;...w..�:w!�.i.:�..+ •w.:a'�Ma«+tom...sMa4�Nea�.M+r«rw.�w,�M.. '.1�isa�i..... i�,�r -t„$n c yt.a�:.ee�.e�"'sem., +.waw,t.n./SP.r+ ...�'a►�.- -+;ii .,x i1 f�M' �tA",R*' r7 �.w Ml-4 hsr{'. '"„5 [r y i5 .. " -- 5- S a ;j_, Y '.+1 .`} t .V,. ,Y '3'.p{a'�rn�» 'l )4" �yyA. C 'SI'D.3t9 r*ay " -,,i'vv. -,. Y+ e +7' ''s x :, _ s r {.'4.'u5 s�, ,:t sa 'a S 7_ v 2 d i.I. „ Y 7f°": 4Y` �ms'a ""'r e X, r 7 t- r J "aF �a �.a �.i t as asn fz „++�,-Z'z i r i, rm a �, C .z t F,�W� g�-'v f„g .11 1-ii,p n x r," .. � }f C q r'a �,�-jJfS k^'N.H'y - t r ', r 3 " akkt ir" t $ A ry�r y, ad„9'll.1 3i k . ? ��" . r 5 r '`hr'k` R>7 .. sj r�' ..... a s fi 7 r $ ; w ; + a i z w.::..* .,' ,r? c*' `z""11 1- tw!` �'x.r �'+a� '3�'�rt -- Ill v ;�z 2 - '° k m,.rr--^rt� q a Y `'.,Er#`x � , I� �-,.,,,,, .��11�1� ;,��,,�, . I 1�7,'� m" , x+�.J ,.. `k x`}'' sr+ w :E " .e�._, , '" . " "I T -�� r `d,�r fi ,a`, _ a tl � x sa �aA..-...[^ ..^. ��.+ S 4w µ f�l�R�d s Qc x ".. k Ft �r kt ` g�` $'s»,+z n'�f+ �" .-t' •'w a.aiM ` ` a ' y,; 5.,�• 'r Ems#' ��.�k � -- 2Y 1+ p.r s a �r�s ..-.7�i. y`�o°t "' t, in.. t7 .,€ �a d :' r _ a�',jli.� -�c �'''t qY, f`,.k+,zt,., r x Y t � .z , " ..,►' :ta"F s `` *`�t.�. n�i.�Ff.► 1 i K"'. '� F r.,f r+ .s»ipr�E'y�5`tr IJE mo, �,_ s .xtia a s s _ a �.. n'�§. : A {p, �, ;t,t'+tir �;-a ^+",,.r�u<'' i, ''.3 „a zk a v a { _,F' saL u� tMt4 ?<7. j ,.c- i%' ,r 'x: x �« .,>*�� .t s x ae�.-: :� d'6. f g'k'y 3 uY Y "'� 7 w Ny fiih x .y."r"SNr �x m11 Wtb �rwyaZurrar � �1 �++ wol 1- �': `N',`x.,'y z- w"ti? h s; rr J� �� +..'"^'�" -, "v °�;C n'�Y• ,f'"z '�."�i," 4+t.,' -,'z.,.,,A' *r,'�;YE`»«'i C '4�'t.'S a...+"+,dk^� 4` ,%Sn 4_1t; s f'r E ( }�'- ,?tis, ` '" Y :eP ann +? g• t"-I� a jy�j, w ".3'ax' y,JLiir ,.,r, 2 1. tt... .«' Y{y.' ,,{��yt�"`rta'z Ir d,a ..%"utt ifym,✓�a Qj7' .>a Xx,^y.,#.r"t $ rr'ie '" ?r K9' art- k �`,t,. 7 t a ,s t + .r y r,i �p ry +.r�;, rct7 s'? _ ur W' """�s4 k+r4 a..z .} ,Yj. rx� Sis, * �"e '*.xn t x t Y,.. r-a^`''.'�zr,�'a' ",s Y., .� -X�,. .s' Srt w " S I�� 9 � _ t+t�4'E � :d 4�i '',,`5'"a-4 i E '�,., n 'y" 4 „.s , r s,„ i ,s*', k a ,rt"w vg's`a "$ 'S y" �x s t 9�-�E Y�' ��y c�, ..a�:. .' `�+'>i r -z 'yam,,7"- 3 ' ,,, t y t nn '',w..c,��§,..,,,, v�a`Y, :'"•`r_ ."' ,/ i.w s i ' 't9 h kS:�(I }, h pre 5 I rk+�3�S5` ; 3 f x W r.*.� � H',F "`5 ixtS4'. �u•Nr d v+ud' 34 _ �""�1"' -:- F + . �� v t a" W P k wi r :v� ae � +a d� o . -- �4 i + r. -_ - f H asa , a" ,,,i rk !It �� �: Ist�°I11111 01,' �� g. . 1. . t . PART it es.�.:a.s'.•�s.�. a:his ossi3tonce rceues:we*40 Stats. Oocat. N=.a or Gab".;. 3aei;. �M r` 3i0 ii es�:iis essixamce request ftga;rs S ,or lm=: of _: t rasry•=auccs:orwi or iesoi:it cl*or--.=M? � Yes_�qtr•, A: f" -s:ais easiata►ea�sewst re�n:er ei.�ri.e�r.e.ry� (.�,•��p�=jyj � _"in=-are nes viae GMs u►cniar r1:a=? '= Yea �a r -a ::iia c z:i,4%arse►seubs:reeav:ee S._.•:y local. Mmes os Apora-Z-V:.grist;► ?r 'arm.or e21mr ptcwting ciarerfe:? Deft = r f� r ae"Moos"pro;ae-eovwme*al•aw 7aro'wd coaaar,— Cast.ows: S=r ra E rj 6,a r ai`t?i=•;? �ee_:w Ems..' , .� es Ka Lo .•toe of?e= f essistunce of Feirro: Insrcti=•'rot. =iiCion? Yes g No Fedsr_!Pow:=:on bxssei::.xj so+a Pmjr_; :tr uss;Stance requersted be oa redvral 1=40C ho--r of Fr'rfa! !as:oll=;ow 3:fiction? Lo:xaa o.=Fsdero!Load i Yes X iso Peed of Project . r tae eaaistonee reQusstee iwve exe is~ t or eftsG _Sae issteyst:ons for o;!:tti=Wl iabrn ccrM !a Ser as revi:annren!? prov:l-d, tae c3s:s:anze ree;vss:gid cause:.fir 2:sai:es eT: la:::e►ice a!a c ,:ivieuo:s, fzmii:err businesses,or iotas? Foo:l:es s 5vs:arssss Y-s ha Fa.-,s is s �,er-o:a-r relc-&d essislaaee on Tais peojee:T;eewierss. S—a�st+sr:t:eas for ey:::ono!Warasrt:�sr To ar � f �_.-�� ea ontieipe:rd? g.eoidst t � . s i n *• i - 00130 .-...�.. ��.�. •.�- �-. -�:- -�� J�v� .r. •.•!•���� ���•rV.r......�-.�....-.ter.r- �- ter.-r - t w 1 r ; Ou Cit= !•� Q R • ii "` f a�� fes; � ti •! t.'T. L: lio cp vi ZL IM , i F• a V eye ri -o c o +o► o c► : c f Cm C? 0 .�•1 Q ai CIS a+ o Zip.: •„:. e•1 { s .: •c s -:-Z 71 IN ' f7 1 � N � •� A...r ' * s• . sS. CA C, CM • L �L• �'� 6i is �`! �� -C6 c = , - QED .3 • � F---n�i Z—A A cb Scx =�C .moi. •� f� V • C cx CM o ai �;� c i o Rr �`• _ .s :` ( 1 `% i ! F F • Q • ` • L .J� � =F i � ..4 t d rj i Q a. C -�i o` ! E- & c G iii �, t:•�. ff;n: �s !�e=. . � • .n t ! t = 1cl i*-i d = ! ! i i • 1 U.Ole sip d F . t t d v s' C — I �'40INzu C3i ca O O c C }� d 2 ' r V t= a P: Is goo �icz • f 1 • 34 Zoe � u a 10 cl Ut •� i iu rf o ,„-F v { r. w s a II ap Y �j � v z C Y i ^' t s f - k.{fG ;( 5 3✓ ° ,� Yt fs'v d { t .t _ �r t' 'I ?v A' F r*a k - a s '` o ,,,r o ;ns fr�'���rs� ',u v10i y �"Y+. g i,."a`�w"t^.s M's5 f" +*s,�,r ''1^` ""`?%' "pt.'.yt fw + '� J pis r E C`�t'"''� ,f" t {, , �'$F' _ + a1A.1t iii +ZSS.itxt.�i7G 7.73Lr1w1�1) 11 � Ff fps}y .u:�tt g�.'�,.-111;; r,.s+tet ,tea . ,o,, I,.and s;-,Oa,..ts��.�tMa matoi t�on�,.,��i� idet zr sir=s V-7-;"rZS'S".Crti.SiN�V. 1S Q. Sar1�.�.'.�lZ� .Z = M�fi "'�,� MM .moi e' .,x t'Xf-it 'Fy�'� 2, "ty s,a?' 'fir" ' ' e ,i. {e 'f*ras r'� s ,� txr a4 -i,s,ur' 2ta Imo:ast;.crsiy ao 3v tar Laa, artCta -�. it w w.ti w�wr ctx � _ ;J' aw amm �Uw liii3�tlL2Ci" �1fl'iQit wSo"iflji►. �q T"'il�T��� " 7 �, = , , o, LWat� R 4�oat,x. arm 7•+d strt�+� f a x� ""ii Vpr3i iisl,:hwsi O S26'tat,2^CX''''.7 I!*'3 �1.""L 444=1 ' �— .� ;e+ x ,*V_-M ;fila b001►,• 2' t; Of T".i� R- _ �• � r �"'1> ;54 �-, p �:s.".�.2t5111a itfaG { 4oT 4, IJE &, a� ,, �� C1TG'GeiQ MR,agw 11", t� � s r '#irTt�We .'8R^� Mz iAORT}e►Q,F�!?3"a_#M �. iC Com' 'v,rp} FtlilM, t � �tSai.'-itr g �,, �. °ZtiGA.'S w �O�t2Cia�1Z3Z��'fT �lC. �x � " + r �z z ���a.�srs ce► � is m�caacA►ai�o a;gran sum 6r. is v_i� , vr�za tar ��" ", -ss.�� wtw�.fw�tfws�wr wr..�y� fl x iOwN� rtllt+i�.,{�wwTTi�1•�7� i�+nV�ri�W +�vY�i.; A�wf4M a{i � t of �,t �' i .�i tr .:.r,;: .'' .: _ Vis,d�.., �..�'+.w"7 ri ,"5:4 .i +Cy- -- Xs�%Y h,t AV�'tiA1 t T�=,aV1+•i. --:I-S.�Sa =0. .- "� 'SS uY, ue'^R�`,i;'E+�'„'dsc��»_ xx"' 'h -ra��°'� �,� _ ^ � w -� �, w I ar t ' +x �i.. "a- aeic sn r-+�na.,.�s i+as Vino z'°R'• �3 Saa""'°','_ t ' "V' r L� 7 I 'Va - a. a X29+, m "'CiT A^.(T„CM jppwsq "iA a'7.P�iit�"bz% .1373�f� t�lflxl�It , ' Mi- r x r{� �_E,� I�Vr+f +�/ .;+t w +Mr�*+Rj �rF�a�...-rp-ro`. .Q {�.��i .S '.!"'h 1'i1l fTCPVPI ��M�W�� '"{'�'fi q " +R�.b �r.F�'k �' �� t CMA •Z S i'�,-—iW y� x' '�.�1Q �-1 , �^E .rs "r NxT�' M. ;...T ' 2't^i'i M. of + q 3..,� �mn as a+ y s !3Lli.:ixV�i}3�.'a "L�”Qt=Qir ifl�il, L' tl i!?Y t F .""' r C��e,w►.....� fII L' Wp M ,_ I ��� � �� yam $ {�3i� yrs �y so-"°m..�.t'd*'3"" � '$'}y{ s �,7 z r r�' yt,�,�� y I �1 M� :.��� � ,. �RIN/�f M. �.M//'�1A�YM�r+".�a'rw"'gr �A�3<j M +.. - as"ri, szsx x s it�«�".r s.atlW 'G"r•�5,."a S�f..Jx t �+ SaIY"�ZiAL bt�{1tiit,..""iili�"!�► 3i#r E. t VM'It' ` u rr Cwl �r a ',", x Y �ifi • q,i I iI-Wii __� M'p•I^y" Y , if" L f`!,tiKu ^� ,4, �" '' w TS k1�4 si. sZt$�iG Cii7. �xr '€+� c �` Yiii 1NtS at S. �i► rte u 6.rYr l 7 rY � '. n .� •-. ham: t � «3,>e arr s ; '� sv3z«• ; '�. `. .- ,X"-Xw as a f -IS,= re= a �., rs - - —, - �' ,a;,.+amu 'tu vr;t t, .:� F,C;i4^moi .t. ,4ont,—.,_ .'�./ � cfjxw. pi 'i. t a �.4}L�" r�. i 111 I sit t71Qy1ai= ."i•�.:^ .. 1� Pt-AQ k ^-•�. �+* a r"I ;vssc a r n *�t F �t .sr- - �►+t,4mr_-w-+/";ii'S,�ne iiia_l..FiS�y'.'.' '�„"��'!� I�iv...,[ y_S 1 i Il'R' �,r.ft F Na �Yi l#" 11 a ti 's s t,� �4�*�.1'1�� i� ..i K".. -Y ..z{{` f ; ;o-r "• r `tt r y a ` r to �w , {zT a sd� '" s:. "I" ? ,' X5 X.e{cz �, > t s kNQ "d r ri 7 kY ', - S r k vI xs., x `" �' r 8 a '�6R-�,� w { �Y NQS '} "^y M f r xX $r 1 x ry S _ t L f ,A't. S" I - s a,'11, r-Ir 11 ,, IrI[, 11 -_ Y '' y :_- �r x ..,.+� - ME r u .0 ,. e. .Sv`n:..,� £ r �." ::u�} a - pts H < lu _. n , „ an,. •i` 4 4 .st' zrFA`,rru**� '.�r4'D'9'?.k'.:"s"h, n dsi u''�14' 3r t �', # t i77 ff ZA ? _ v t7. v ;c ID zi CZ LM Z. 46-6 �U U C�j :.�tlt C-i 7 -tit O Sa O (h UA v: ..t Vb- .T. _ G . cc C ��yr V .W4 114 Q = O G G u zal ..s r c :iis j a 0 cc -e a e a a c v = a In M C. — y I � � = �+ i m a La L.8 j . -- -�-+ e o :. v CJ - c a CA �. ^ .. - :r v us z+ .0 ci fl 4J G u L O G O O r > —Os :3 'a 'Ll 44 AA a j G - s - � u a L` 1 -ei 3+ 0 ? U N � � 1,+ t! 6 C C: G J J � C3 i _ 4 0 -!+ ,r+ -r+ ' o a sa c — '-' r c:. c .+ v C3 t U to ..r C3 3 a, t _1 • _ � 1 r � `j i �- • = .01 4 i �+ f s:•� —t • LZ i �j ! 1f LZ' C.f .4 i � '�� 2 ' i _mss $ �2 � Q , c�.1 t,3 r. � .-.� • .`• _♦.t • n. , • f i ce- •,�� � S � S a � � � i ` a I �-= M I S � � t S ' I -�I r' T szZeaz i j t If = t L � , iC �: �► U N C t C"? p w 1 � i M 4 C •-� l7 :•a t .+ c r .v w ` u . O�i !�; N V G C N r -�+ y V•A v C.> i t �4 w 3 S E i • i j = T « ..�• 1 r F s ♦ { � � w ice ; � l � t ;� � .n ;2t { t • r i � � � f 4 �w w SS a IF i j a T f zz CS ; -e- o cz .... � � � ✓a L SCS,j 'r �i � L1 t^► C L= � 4 � c.^1 ` •,.it i • M . v y � V ' • t s ,'�o• 1C'3 t,,,,• P. a r- t 'k • ►•� �_ .._ �•�-.-Z. SCI-1301 ups tr�_- i! r=====e C4 94553 = t ! CN,. ! s - t t t Z.-, Q -- rr vs;Ft t j N E t �� t1` � � � tri a =• _ � � � � C V{ i t • � 1 1 = v __ t C• ti i .:• r cwt a r. 'n= t LRct t ^i nt c' ' 1 � � i c � < t ~ � i �� i ` `` _tet � GI -• �� •_ �I —• _— co 9013` 3105 Pass RC2- �'t E i O / 0 n E 40137 • (3105 Rash. • � f � V c � f 1 U-0 1p L'1 iiF Eej ILP IF Cl T G I'i a C3 t IE 1 � j yrs� a � ;•r -: .-► t c t 1 E " • r E o :1. t � 4 .. ! 4 I t �� Ui U• ' � a� i �' • :� i <.� c to 11 i �� � J = • z-t• ^.� t::� N; �{ G�� of F--1 ►' . t � � } 3 � • M I � 1 1 r � � � I� � f � L r � l M L i a tt t t F t To cl IE W C-C Ln 1 c t 1 {E L7 r. -i7 1a. i. '` � � � `= !•! -� i 4� ..t � a �i of oi CDP ' y 00138 �p v2.c:.a C= 914555 :I v ti = .F 3 � t � � � t � � � � • F E i � ,� um co E � C. 01.)138 rho " L•.`.f'f=G�'7 '1?amu` LT� /-� _ Firs: n•GQ:��i. C.EI���.� Q� POLLS:L L:rs 7�,w vi�i32 Avenue CA 91-553 :I v ti = Ir zi cc o us a f 1ee F t tJ 2 Ccm .t o F • { �V ! �� 0 V� �I ri f.:.: an JI Ui OI �1 —� !--' - . 00139 S _r_ L $=F2_z ` Ini Ir r � : -• � i-�..' i i 1 i :, i9 p o i f $1 ; t , � � 1 t f{ - t i o � r, fy • t L/ L1 1 4 co 10 e � IiF f r y C.0 s.:t c y r N N# V G .0 r u 1 4 .�• 00140 s • '^_ ; - _ ,,..--'x"•11 �'•� j r. , . r VA tn i s t 1 .`i 1 a'1 t' i t 't �• j z iy ! t i i t Q t L s i t J C'1 97% — L3 c C2 CM CV' LM • � J G r � � � � S CCC a. o 0 0 o p o ! :.. ccs ._ f .. ► c � f _. : — -- — f • Ir= Z3 � f C3f O i tn J4 r r- v f _ - �t Cr C2 4-11 43 t7 =: t4 o � � tom? :. Ba wl' Y cl -•t ri '.3 tat _ a tT ct :, 4 Cl c.� a o f a U j 09 t r? V7 c... tj - 0 � _f L S .:i { . Ylk ZA PA �%:; ::• � � � 4-1 :"�! t'i't ; � t p..t � � �..•s v t � �SZ � iii .3� .,;,,� ` S � �'� y f 4 i t o 15 s ... � :-= LA c. 1 i%} � � L G to � � '�►� � G" � - T � /` It J' 1 00143 -. s Cl _ � ` � cam! - _ - • w - .,. o IR C-S Y O 1 =t c 3 =•• tn el i E �. WIN I C%0 ni Com"_`' J en • tt 'tn - t • ! - cn UZI tol cn 00 ir )7 1 = o i c^; t }.c o elf to ci • ! • ! • 2 - o # ' ! ' e11 c-� t :-f i r► 1 -1 ! t t } 1 '�; —• n O a 1 1 1 2 in 4i _ cm e S-4 _ r-4 44 ZAIa in C2 to n ja d 4.0 t f u .7t cr 00 .45 r,Y S t ♦ r L) } L► v =* toat ti Ica } t i i cjcl ' , Iii � � � y ♦.; N .,..� ! = i # �. � � � . �. ZA Al ell 43 tn Sri K3 —11 Y. el tl 00 .► - ,. 0' '51 r { Cl.. t 1 ; ! f r ; EPAR—M-ENT Or EDUCATICK. AND WELFARE SZ su_so+ svaEE r �'� i•y saa�C:SCQ. Caitl*Oa,a♦ naa� Oss1►E ;c 0-710E OF C-S DEVEID?" TERMS AND CONDEMNS This s--== is subiet_ to tine Te---s a=d Coo`itfors ae .a=-3orre--=4«z all grants z a_di after 3a=u3rr 1. 2.5F3. under Title 13 or 1I1-3 of he C-=== tv Services Ac: of as a a--ded. and =etralat:o-..s of the Coit? Sers-feas A '^;stratiou and the e. wealth— du=a a. and -Welfare. This gran_ is subject to the appeals provision of part 16 of Title 45 o: the %ode of Federal Regulations. These provisions offer the cr ante-2 the riahi tL apoeal Certain adverse aecisirns Of 0'-D to the Depattmen`- Grant weals Board. The decisions which may be appealed are: 1. A deter.ninatian that an expenditure not allowable under the arant has been charced to the grantor that the grantee has atherwise railed to discharce its oblicatien to aCCCUnt Tor grant funds_ 2. Tne disapproval c: a crantee's written request for permission to incur an exa?nui turee du.-ing the ter-. of the grant. 3. Establishment of an indirect cost rate- 0%'.'9 may suspend assistance under a gran: during the proceedings resulting from a grantee appeal or otherwise defer or withhold payment under the grant as appropriate. 00148 4 F i- CONMCYS. i C0:'R=S r nAMED 3YC'��:=-_: (Fedezral. – SGOS,S314) i t: c Riclu=nd 2:enaris •.se. _ M"&,799) 321 l—n Szree_, Ric'smaor, CS Rodeo C iQ Developm?3L Center, in=. 2ne anE LaIze S---eats, -=a2i._ Ca t j 3. Amine Sz ame Ois-4— ($20,425) c71 r 4. 'Mt. Diablo L•^_:tee Stbao; Ais is► ($3.4,531) t 3105 Willow Pas= Road, Vas_ ` � 5. First B_� i � Cb•srch Qi 2'x57*• S (S8O X0 3 lti� , 904 Odessa t=�.�.•a, _i�rsB•�-S, C ` t s o. 'Catho23.c Cha:itis Orr min.-;ie= ($71,4CK) 433 Jefferson Street, 0.,,W y—d_, l.s. _ i 00149 r i i ru T=-?-.S IkN3 CO.` 17IONS zrant is subject to t1we Tem and Com:UzIons ihejc-a gaverming al-I gz=ts a�ar66d aft January 1. 1973. under Ts_le 11 or 1:T-3 0 e G^ .^�" Services Act of 19:4 as emended, and 'Regulations of the Ca==d.—tv Services Amu;stratus: macs the aerart=ent oz 'Heal--h. Ldur._tiaa. and %elfa-e. h'rnrran funds exnended sneer aut*ha:ity rz this a-=t aCti--s are srnfec= to the provisions of the Co-_-Ami v Seryi.ces Act as arenae-_;4 tate Rene-=: conditions fisted below and adv attached "eciah- dant R.enuire=en_s fonstc in Rant conditions, ice': or Co-_=x:ty Serrices AG=ir{srration di ertives aobii.cable to Head Stat nav be waived o=!r by a c-rit=ea notizicat;a^ s;=ed by as authorized HEV official. Anv such waiver sit be explicit: no waive- b3v be info-red tray the fact that _1e str t act*oa is resvor_sive to a grand' ;undirm request v`aich may have contained =atee-al incmmistent v th one or a- these conditions. 1. D—:`%'TT7i3S_. As used :n these conditions: a. An "aooroved ororrahs' consists oniv of those acts .-sties described ;n the grant funding renue t. =•HM•iY^ i��:j.S :e:lrz to ba i axrarxs app_- ed for expezdi:.s:re �vr r: r C S - nz �iiC� • . ttr ;:� s....ase:.. p::.ara._ a3 sus:. o: :nr 0..,� _�ateaer. o G.a.. ' mb t:M: aw t. amum-cs ac= derived so* Fedsra's or moo-z-aderai sources. : or vhe:4w :'sem are pre ided in tasb or la-kind. _ 2. : M ICLIS%11T OF O.-MMMMS :O P—wA_L AMMEMS, zhe" cocditions are ap_llcaile oath to mes grantee =d to aag delegate agency or orgac- s za:ioa :s ac. pacssa nt co as agreeaLmat with to* grantes, 'cadet responsibility for azy part os .he apfproaed pcog:s= Such an agreeaeat my as entered Into an3_r if: A. Tat intention to came suer a dalgpcion to the pertfculsr agent: has neem se- :ortb in the fundicg request for this grant action or uas otlarwise been approved by �. b. The contract contains all of the pravisiacs found in the approved "Standard Contract Fora for Delegation of Accounce, 3. - z--MiAY ON EI_M_tslss"O: O= Y -rMS_ zspeoses charged ` against program Binds msec not be locurred prior cc tae effective date of the Prah: or subsequent co tae earlier of: A. Tbae program near end date. b. The grant ter-mination dace, and way be incurred only as neces- sary to carry out the pe:.-Poses and activities of the approved psograe�. Susi+ expenditures any not exceed tae mazioua limits sat in the approved budget shorn; on ti=e. OCD Sumemect of Grant Award or those in a budget subsequently amecded for that approved program, acklect to allocable flaxibilicy gcfidelines published 3y OCD. All expeases incurred .Sar the approved program mast bt supported by approved concraccs, .purcbase orders. reWuLsitsors. bills, or other evidence of liability consistent with the grantee or delegate agency's established purchasing procedures. L abilities of the grantee or its delegate agencies to third parties an a result of termination action which are costs of winding-up in accordance with D':Mt directives or-are specifically approved shall be considered proper expenditures of program funds. WSW will determine the disposition of u=mcpeaded funds at the tenzInation of the grant. 6. _L'.1L*YBIIO:35 ON Ex DITUM OF r:meant- Ftt , Expenditures of Federal fu.-ds my not exceed the amment of the grant sbo"D on the OW Statement of Grant Award. In addition, the Federal share of the costs of the approz-ed program may not exceed the =dwam Federal percentage of program funds shwm on the OCD Stateewat of Gzaut Award. The amount o: :"a:al fLrgads expended rider this grant action nal► not exceed the grantas's allocable costs for the approved program which have been or are to be pafd in cash. PaSp 2 of 8 Pages be 00151 i a I. 3. -yasca'cmx-4 T_J:ti No Derso^. he U=4-ted State3 6-al" s am the z ouad of rata, colo_, __!L-;ioa or as=a-»a? origin. b_ excluded iron. nartic;_ation be denied =he uracee s of. or be subJect zo ciscat_cn under _ie v". zz= :az_ovec as a rs:?t or this request. The grantee and its dal-azate agencies viLl the* regulations nro .gated by the Secretary, :. �;, v:th the approval of the Presidea,. urs-..ant-to the Co- ^?t} Services Act a= 1974. 6. D_SCRII '._`NATION 1?C MiPLOYMENT FROST_3ZTM. in zz? hiring or a=iov- ment made possible by o_ resul=i= from chis grant action each ems=over: a. W-;'-' rat disc:.;^{rate against any ee or avplicant for eaploc-. at because of .ace, color, relizion or aatictnal orm-xia_ b. Will telae affirmative action to e^sure that a"licants are emnloved and that e=lovees are treated d=: -_z eaalov--aeat, without regard to their dace, color, religion or national aria n. This require- neat shall analy to, but not be 3 m+ted to, the fallowing: er.91or"at, ua,grad=ng. demotion, or transfer: recruitneaz or recrztasent advertis!=3; layoff or te=izaatioa. rates of pav or of e= for--s of cc-vensatfoa; and selection for traini-:g. ince. i^.g z=retice:�h'_p_ 'Th_ grantee and its delegate agencies shall colic with all applicable Statutes znd Executive Orders as equal euplov-meat cpnort=nity and this grant action shall be 90vI-11--wec by th~ arov<_sic^s, as set forth in DE"W directives. 7. :Oi .L T AGAT_*!ST CONTINGENT :S. The grantee oar ants that no person or saving are^.cv or other o,ani:atop has been ---m?ozed or retained to solicit or secure this grant ac== upo:. a agreement or uad=_stag i g for a co=ission, percentage., brokerage, or coatiingent fee. lar breach or violation o: this Jar.azt, the govern-eat shall have the right to a=u-I this gra.:t act—ton -- thou_ L'ability or, in its dis- cretion, to deduct- _:aha the grant o: otherwise recover the full amo=t of such co-yission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, or to seek such other remedies as nap be legally available. a. SUS?r—NSTOS AND TrEmn.4TTON. The Director of OCD aa_, in accordance with published regulations, suspend or te----d-nate this grant in :mole or in part for cause, ---aide: shall include: a. =ailuro or u --illingaess of the grantee or its delegate ' agencies to couply with the anp roved program including attached conditions, with applicable statutes and executive Orders, or with such HEW or Co=m nits Services Administration directives as may beta-e generally applicable at any time. Page 3 of 8 Pages .. 00152 f b. by :me Gransee or fis delegate a;encfes to nzw o. fir:ss 3ch- are iz=rrecc or 1=9 -;,late in a-7 aazce-a: reszec:. L. :r.ef-!-ec=ive or use of cede:al -funds by _tom X=--zee ar its delesaze agencies. - z. Ffek!--ig ante c.a-zze va:x siV+Ificzaa zly !=Pa-:-s the rep�stz tine caava.—m:e_ o= the grastae's ;.ol=cg--akSg boor or the graacae's caracitr to en"4 = :. 5 scppor=. e. :ail of the s anceeeits:r to adequately =oaicor and evaluate aros=an act v=ties dere fated to ocher ap-mncies or to arovfd_ effec-"Iva grlsance to sem:: amen-fes in carry-nn out the our-mose and ;nivel;es of. the oo:��s of cae auproved progress delegaced to th=. Thi z craat ase also be suspended or cez..._ua:ed In Awle o: in cart . . In ::hee:act tae tt--a~tm is a C •--4:v Action Agency and a new age=cy Is recog4zed by w�:ty Seri ices A-`--viscratio~ as tae Co===ity Action Agents for al" or aa:t of zhe area seed by the grances in accardazce w tb Co-wx-{z Services c-4aa direccfves. In such event sari o: :he gear= funs ase.* the grantr_'s or delegate agencies' functions. obiirat:o_s. records for copies), antbozisv and oropert4 :alatinte to ass;stam a orevided to the grantee or its delegate agencies rrfiar tb4z =razz ac=:Eor sh-11 be transferred Irs the grantee azz.-If its delegate asesciss to such ==lT recognized ae -s. No susaession or termivation will affect =_veaenZcures or legally bind casitosnts rade pr=ior to receirl::F ao=:ice ar the suspension, or ter-=t t:L=, p=bvfded such expeadii tures cr -=: t===s; vete rade in good faith and not in aatic patfon of ear-{-=zl and are otnerv;rse allarable. IInads sna%? not be treated as ==: tt--d far tnss purpose solely be vie •e of a gr--=aa's cone alit or other c=---4^en: to a debate agency. Upon suspension orzee-_ate, cbe disposition of e3ezpendad Federal fnacs and 7--=arty purchased wits progr= funds will be subject to RM Tae fanwing special condicons applicable to Co=—ity Services Adm'a- istration grants v11 apply to OCD, MR grants until such t;Ie as WW Lzstrcctiaus are issued. In, addition, the Mrantes aunt incorporate these eoze;cions into airs delexation anreezent entered into. 9. R_vp aRT_s. RScoMs. sD i'ESprCiYOhS. Rye Rvantee and its delegate agencies z!--all submit financial. proxcam progress, evaluation. and other reports as required by OCD directives, and shall maintain such prraarty, perso-.mel. financial and ocher records and accounts as are dee-ed ne-cessary. The grantee and its delegate agencies and contractors sh_13 reit on-sitz :Ln"acr4ozs Sr Rte.' representatives, and shall, e:?active=.. regvi-e e_---.:aTea and board =esberz to furnish such +nfor- aation, as in the Judgexut of the HEW representatives, may be relevant Page 4 of 8 Pages • - 00153 to a nmes:i^a a: ca--. 2with z ant ce-adimians amod O:i~' P:::! Cz--- :-in =ervices Ad!"1=1s:rz::c- directives. movZirab a to Sea_ S=ari er the effective:ass, == ;::. sad ac::fev is of =he All Gran: records Lz:: h: :.adz a x:'s--ble cc :he amzhors:ed 1ves of «: or t_.e Cv=zrel�'ler 4+e=Cra= of tam r-ized Stales, and wI l be retalmed fa: gree sews Ira mb-. issiom o: the a Baas exaead:ture rector. with :he fo l.-W14 p: ara!lffcacic:s: a. Fecords shall be re=aimmd be, :he 3-reg: serfod i~ a--A:c fexegs have not been resolved. b. terrors for nza-exaendable grope.-:v sihich was aczr-4=e- Faderal cram- :.suds shall be retained for 3 years ate= its -lag disposition. C. Wsea g:ant records a--e trahsfe-gid to or sz1rzIaed by O t a 3-vear retention- recr3renec= is mac a=llcable to the Xtra=tee. 10. SEPEeSs.S DISAUM s. Zia vroiect funds she'--: be exsa'nded ;o= t:ee cost o= seals for wwlovees o: officials o: the Rraztee a*enev or delegate avencies exceat saes: on travel status o='tae ealaw" is aaricizat ax iz an a?io=able Nczram ace- -v %inere crest fts have beem auth=rized to orays-de food -e n--oar= va -.icl7z=ss (ower t1man exo:cvees). and the e=los ee in rer-u£red smv his lob duties to raise oa- in the actid_ty. Grant Related in.-on'. The =mcee is a- - -table t* :he ii=w for the :ede=a3 kha:e of adv &==z-related #-..-� menamted bw ac-;�ciea ne=:araed ender these *rants. Such income way be produced by the sem ces of Ir.o."Qiduals, or by acp1ovin* equipment and facilities, royalties and profsts £tow pushli- cations, firms, or similar materials. or general services of the gc=tce Inst=tution. The percentaxe of such scare shall be eq-al to the peree::tage of the total casts (direct and :=direct) of the activity suer,orted by the Federal Goverment_ All Grant :-elated income (other t'.san interest earned, and fees collected ,see below) earned durfult the ' grant period shall be retained by the grantee and, accordance with the grant agreement shall be: A. Added to funds coc=Ltted to the project by the Rranta-- and grantee and be used in further ells+ble prosgraae objectives. b. Deducted from the to:al a:oject costs :or the psraose of determlainst the net costs on which the Federal share of costs s.-eM be based. Page S of 8 Pages 00154 C-ancee inst__utio»s are revaired to raiataia :records of the recezvcs and disposition of :he Federal snare e- ran related iucci a is the sant mar as rea-m-I ea for the :mss provided by :.he gam: -iah gave rise to the interest Ea-r-je2. The amounts earned o» Bract funds, with the followi x exceatica. ust be re=•ux-med to the Dom. State lover^—eats and.a=r a¢encv or iastr=entalits of a State, however, shall not be held acco=t able for interest eL�ed as grac. fids-perd the disbursextt for progr= proses. . 12. PUBILM&TION AND ?UT ICI PE. The grantee nag pcbLsa results of the approved Bead Start p=Xr= %eithout prior review by —=V, vrovided zl%at such oubls cations aemmuledge that the program is supvorted by funds granted by E.' purs=mt to the provisions of the Cax:=u=3cy Services Act of +574, a-..:3 that five copies of each such puallcation are fural-saed to EEW. 33 C07MCc S. If the Bract results is a book or other- coavri*table material the author is fie to cawmicht the work, but EEW reserves a - roraltvs free, moa-exclusive and irrevocable license to rev=oduce, oublish ar centre—se use, and to authorize others to use, all coavrighted materiall and amv cater;al vi:--'cn can be copyrighted resultinz frog the avoroved Read Start urogram. it.. PA MNTS. In accordance vita Decartaent P.e=. Iac ons (45 C??, Subtitle A. Parts 6 and 8), all inventions made is the course of, or uncle_ aav grant shall be orxQtls and fu'lr reported to the Assistzmt Sec_eta*r for Health. U.S. Deoarr -rent of Eealta. Bd•.ratien, and Wel:are, 330"Indeaendence avenue. S.E., Mashimccam, D.C. 2a2O1. Ther Beall be SL-m-I taneously reported to other Federal agencies renuf ed under t1he ter=s of Executive Order 14096. as amended. The grantee and the project director shall neither have nor =ake anv cosedtaents or obligations which conflict vith the req::irecants of this polar. A complete and written disclosure of each invention in the fora specified by the Assistant Secretary for .riealta shall be made by the grantee pro=ptly after conception or first actual reduction to practice, and, In any event, prior to p:3Lcatioa. The grantee must include a certification on inventions with the sub- mission of each continuation or renewal application. A €incl invention statement and certification must be submitted after termination of project s=port. • Yage 6 of 8 Pages 00155 t 15. Lr-F.I- Al: ,a':+-vers and neciaaics en;+.taved 3v co:-- tractors c: sub-contractors in the construction, alteration or reaafr, inzlud!nz raiatIn_- and decoratim-c of r-roiects, b=sidi=¢s and work=. u-bich are federally assisted under this zrant small be said wales at rates mnt less than thane nreva!lin, or si3iia- construction in the lncalitv,- as Aeter=ined by the Se-retarr o: Labor in-accordance stili: the Davin-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 2762-5). _ 1S.. RMUCIOUS I\S:=T'?%'S. The ¢rantee and {is delegate aszencies shall ensure that amv Dart of the avn_oved aro:rte c'_:at is conducted by a &urcn or church related irst`_turio» is entirely non-sectarian in content and aurvose, and that 7.-EW/Co=-ntity Services Admen;stratiau directives on s=rants and deleeations to churches related institutions are satisfied. 17. . KNUAN SLBJ'aCiS_ Safezaardiat the rizhr-s and welfare of "h-.-2'. subjects involved in activities sunnorted by DMEV grants is the responsibility of the institution which receives or is acco=table to OCD for the Rinds awarded for the suaaort of the activity_ in order to provide for the adecuate dischar¢e of this itsti tutio-ma? resbo-s_b;litm, it ist.�e ^elicp of the Dna::, mat no grant for as ac_ivi y i;valving h am subjects sInaz= be made twless the ano4cation for such sunaart has been reviewed and anoroved by an 20mro7riate institutional co=ined. is. ygna_a7y do nrozram funds ray be expended or costs incurred f-r the vurehase.of real rronerty. Dni'ao= standards zovern- inn the a`.Tlization and eisnes_t_oa of vromerty are set forth i» nffice of hana¢ement and Budget Circular A-102, Attact-ment h, which is available from the asorovr ate9CD awardirz office. Tnese standards avnly to State or local roverents zrantTes and school districts. 19. 3n\-9INr. State and local grantees, includinz school districts. are not required to obtain additional bond;nz or i-nurance over and above that which is :aormal?y reouired by t:^.e grantee. All other r_antees are recuired to Wake arrar.Renen!:s for apvron-&4-ate bond_nz of grantee officials who are authorized to size or counter siva checks or disburse .cash. The amount of coverage is ecual to the total amount o: the grant or $25,000, whichever is less. The bond- ing coverage will run for a period of three years from the effective date a` the subject avr.licat_on, vavabl= in vearI7 install=encs. 20. O=-.ICE OF u:.�yC="�.: A.%'D BT-Ir::T CT_P.CUT A3 A-102. The Administrative Page 7 of 3 Dazs ©0111 ao?icies es n-4 ce of "lanazement ZMd 3udget Urcriar A-102 are :sereb inco-ro :e ara ! 37 reference :or a?? State or local 7.07e "3eat „ .a=tees aa3 schoa_ 4dist-i cts. A coax of the C cciar res be datarne-� f z= the =D—.,m---ate a:ardia2 OCD of:;ce_ ' page 8 of 8 Psges av7 p 1 h In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California page- 8 of 8 Pages 001W In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 '. In the Matter of Der.lacing Two Animal Control Tr Vek Bodies as Surplus Property On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IY IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that two Animal Control Truck Bodies are declared surplus property and the County Purchasing Agent is authorized to sell said property to the County of Sonoma, and, Further, it was noted that the equipment had been appraised and the price of $700.00 each was determined to be a fair price. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Compensation for Damage to Personal Property - Don Flory IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that reimbursement be made for damages in the amount of $34.75 sustained to the watch belonging to Donald Flory, Clinical Psychologist, Medical-Mental Health Services, damage being sustained in the line of duty on April 18, 1975. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig: HRA 1A ftm my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Medical Director affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 Chief, Medical Administrative /) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Services !� Deputy Clerk County Auditor-Controller By Ma Cra3 County Administrator 001 M'q H 24 9175 10M p6}; p. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 1976 In the Matter of Statement of Position on Compulsory Binding Arbitration This Board having received a memorandum from the County Supervisors Association dated December 30, 1975, advising of a County Supervisors Association plan to provide information to the public on major issues of importance to counties, among which is a statement in opposition to compulsory binding arbitration for public employees; and This Board having considered approval of the plan suggested by the County Supervisors Association and its statement on compulsory binding arbitration; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the position paper of the County Supervisors Association on compulsory binding arbitration (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board) is hereby ENDORSED and AFFIRMED as the position also of this Board. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 1 hereby certify that the forepohV is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator Wwwn my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Supervisors Assn. affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 Director of Personnel % . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By, / Deputy Clerk Mar. Craig&�7 00160 H 24 4"5 to" I� f Z ..arae. v.. •`a.. a34: \ i jf✓lr.._t1,1,U v 17/ �tL:f i/I�SLi� J+,liCC 211 , (e:h y 1. tittLlCt!t? Sacr:.::tcn_ro, •C::1 1 JVornia 95314, C^:R: .X • tita:£t15�r .�(t. iSiS CI:i�� O. x.11 Count} Supervisors and VLO's in Counties with Information Officers _ Re: 1575 CSAC Public Info--ation Plan At its D4cc=ber : reating tete CSAC fwecutitie Coraittee approved a Cbh ' glacz to provide information to the public on issues of major icportance to counties. These major issues :::re identified as: -Coastal Plan - -::�di-Cal Reform -Tax Reform -Gas Tax 6 High;ea+ eicancin_: Juvenile Justice R-form EindinZ Arbitration. The Executive Coa»ittee also requested that Boards of Suoerrisors in counties w.Laich rare an infor=a_ioa officer direct that their infonsation specizlest rarticipate in the CSAC plan_ The assistance of counties in major netropo;i- �� tan areas is essential i; :;c are to achieve substantial public inpset_ Enclosed is the first of several position papers on the =jo. issues that CSAC will be sending you. The position expressed has already been approved by tate Exeeutire Cots-.ittce. We are askita2 your county to: (1) Go on record in support of CSIC's position of opposition to cc wpuZ- sory bindinZ arbitratio:; (Z) Direct that your Hoard's opposition to arbitration be m`dc kr_o::t: to the public; and (S) Send MC a copy of your Board's action. ' Arbitration hes been selcc_ed as one of the major issues for 1975 bet=s_, in the ua:-.•e of several police and fire strikes i. 1375 and the failure to ach;r-re comprcT^nsive labar relations le:lsl tion. the Lii-islr7.urn may- seek a sim?;Es- tie solution to satiety employee strikes. Howerei, neither the public nor mist legislators geacralir understand why arbitration. is not an alternatiye to stril.rs. ?:e ur,e your active participation in tztis effort_ Other• Position papers ::iLT be forwarded as they are d_►eloael_ . Sincerely. jn RECEIVED cc: C-+1:•i:. F�ccr:int? -ice:Taro; ' FEB 2 1976 J. & OLSAK CIFRlC BOARD OF SUPSV=RS I Co Miafifine�' ',',"th 00161 POSITION PAPER ON CONFULSORY BIXDI.VG ARBITRAT10Y The County Supervisors Association of California is vehemently opposed to con- pulsory bindinZ arbitration for public employees. Arbitrytion is not an alternative to public employee strikes. It is not a means for resolving impasses which develop between public erployees and public agencies. Arbitration is the antithesis of good faith negotiations. _ Coapulsorl binding arbitration is strongly objectionable because it undermines the negotiation process and has the following defects: (1) ?negotiation docs not occur when an arbitrator imposes an agreement on the parties, only when the enployer and the union sion an agreement. (2) Arbitration eliminates the pressure necessary to force the parties to nego- tiate_ Only when both sides lrow• that if they do not sign an agreement there is the possibility of a strike (lawful or unlawful), is there pressure on both sides to atter-pt to reach an agreeacet, by negotiating and by agreeing to give up certain demands if the other side gives up sone demands. (3) Only if there is a signed aarecnent- (rather than an imposed award) do the parties feel an obligation to cake the negotiation process and the relationship bctuven thea based on the agrce=ent work, rather than continue 'fighting indefi- nitely. 4 (d) The experience in the State of Michigan, as well as our experience with fire- fighter arbitration in the Cities of Oakland and Vallejo. indicate that arbitrators often get the feeling that they know better how to run a fire department than the local elected governing body. An arbitrator who has the power to maize an award governing working conditions also has the power to determine how a particular department should be run. how aanr people should be hired, what caseload standards should be applied. and who should do a particular job. (S) Even when an arbitration award cones down in. favor of the employer, there is no more incentive for the union not to strike than there is under present law. A court would probably be willing to throir the local eicctcd officials into jail for refusing to inpleaent an arbitrator's award, but is much less likely to throw a few hundred or thousand courty employees into jail if the union refuses to follow an arbitrator's award and goes on strike. (5) An outside person will dcterszinc the agreement, not the parties themselves. Thus, neither side is forced to develop the expertise and discipline necessary for negotiation, since often where arbitration is guaranteed the parties tend to use arbitration as a crutch. or at least one party does so, and thereby never gains the experience and leadership necessary to do effective negotiating. (7) An arbitrator which is not responiible nor responsive to the eo=unity will nave dtcisions about the levels of services and taxation for that community. Ties cocnunitt will haze to be taxed at a leve4 necessary to support the arbitrator's award for the public a=ployees' salaries, benefits and working conditions. F ,,. D MU c ' c.,- sr-.. purr 00162 Microfilmed with b--:;rcf o.-der A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorize Payment of $270 to Jessie's Detail Service, 613 - 23rd Street, Richmond, for Damages The Public Works Department having indicated that a number of privately-owned vehicles were damaged when paint being sprayed by County employees on December 11, 1975 at the Richmond Corporation Yard was blown onto the vehicles; and Arrangements having been made with Jessie's Detail Service, 613 - 23rd Street, Richmond, California for removal of the paint at a total cost of $270; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to issue a warrant in the amount of $270 to Jessie's Detail Service in full payment of all claims resulting from said accident. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 I hereby certify that the fan poing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Administrator Supervisors cc: Auditor-Controller armed this rid day of February , 19 ?6 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Mair Crai FO 63 H 24 a175 loft s>6+A in i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 119 76 In the Matter of Termination of Rei.mbursenent Agreement Dolores Nino On recommendation of the County Auditor-Controller IT IS BY M_ BOARD OPJWM THAT the Chairman IS FERFBv AMORIZED to execute Ternd.nation of Reimbursement Agreement which was taken to guarantee reaayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Dolores Nino who has made repayment in full. ti Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976. i 1 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Orirzi.natine Meat: Anditor-Gontroller Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 7f, County Counsel J. R. 0 MN )W.MKXXSM Clerk By ^ Deputy Clerk MaYF Craig M24 al72 IOM ` r TI09i OF REIMBURSDW.Ur MEEMM } The REIMBURSEHM AGREFIOM and NOTICE OF 1JM executed oa March 1, 1962 by Dolcres Nino and recorded in the official records in the office of the County --Recorder of this Coustyoa _3u1v 3, 1962fn Volume 12152 at page 121 is hereby released Dated: FehruAry 4♦ 1076 By order of the Board of Supervisors. OF THE BOARD 6F SqAVISORS Contra Costa County STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Contra Costa _ On (date) 1 Q?r, before me, _ Mary Craig ~ da e—puty county clerk of this county, personally appeared Temps P_ -nny known to me to be the person who subscribed this instrument and to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of this County and acknow- ledged that he executed it. J. R. OLSSON kt�( M, County Clerk by� DepWy Count,Cierk z 00'' ;3 Microfilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 19 76 In the Mauer of Contract Amendment Agreement #20-006-1 with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. To Continue Workshop Transportation Services for Mentally Retarded Adults Through March 31, 1976 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract Amendment Agreement 020-006-1 with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. to continue the provision of workshop transportation services for mentally retarded adults under Title XX of the Social Security Act, as amended, for an additional six months from October 1, 1975, through March 31, 1976, increasing the Contract Payment Limit by an additional $51,660 to a new total of $154,980, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract_ Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregakV is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supervmors cc: County Administrator affixed this 3r@ day of Februgry , 19 County Auditor-Controller - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Welfare Director By `" Deputy Clerk State Department of Health Contractor Nagy' Cra 01166 H 24 895 IOU „r CO.'3TRACT AXZ-!1WE.'J? AGR.E ..BENT (Cancra Costa County Human Resources Agency) Number "" 0 - 00 6 i. iden-U- ca ion or Contract 4o be Amended. Nllnber: 20^-006 Department: Social Service Subject: Workshop transportation services for mentally retarded adult recipients E lective Date o Contract: October 1, 1974 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department r_ameed abave, and the fol-loaiiig named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: MnTkh'Ez BUS LIMES, INC. Capacity: Private-for-profit California corporation Address: P.O. Box 607, Martinez, California 94553 (3300 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez) 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is October 1, 1975 4. Amend-hent Specific-ations. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the "Amendment Specifications" attached hereto Which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Legal Auzk±or#y. This Contract Amendment Agreement is entered into under and subject to the follow legal authorities: Title )M of the Federal Social Security Act, as amended (P.L. 96-647); California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703 £.. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF C04 iRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR FEB 3 1976 r74,- By - J. P. Kenny By �.--.• P ---- 3'- an, Board o= Suaa v ors Designate official capacity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) State of California ) 3y .� County of Contra Costa ) ry Craig :'^` Deputy yAexNoWL;rnncMT (ec 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended hy litimp- Resnumes Agenc • known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared efore me today and acknowledged that he/ By they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board o: directors. Form f�z r:, d: Couz z - Dated: l 8y Qeputy ` 7co-,'rCoatiContra 2 utt unt Clerk ROBEP.T J. PROCTOR 0 with mrd order PU r l COUNTY CLERK 0167County, California i a �iLMC1L.`�T SPECIFICAT1aYs j Humber 20 - 006 - 1 In consideration of Contractor's agreement to continue providing workshop transportation j services .` r an additional size months under the Contract identified herein, County anrnac, t0 i.lrr pcp e the total amount paiable to Contractor under the PaYmsent Limit of Wry Craig '' lieputy hCKHQLEIIGtiEkT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recon _.:ce3 L • .'u -^- R eJo=M'es Agenc • known to me in those individual and „A_ .j personally appeared business capacities, p ! PP eiore cue today and acknowledged that he/ they signed it and that the corporation By Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Form �:^4..�: Cosa:_ ro_-: _ Dated: l B Y Deputy e ut= unty Clerk ROBERT J. PROCTOR orlder DEPUTY COtJf` W CLERK j6arof►!mtd� vAth 00167 Contra CC;-.a County, California i E ;1'1£ND.&4&%'T SPECIFICATIONS �j {� s Humber 20 t� "a9 4 In consideration of Contractor's agreement to continue providing workshop transportation services for an additional six months under the Contract identified herein, County agrees to increase the total amount payable to Contractor under the Payment Limit of said Contract. Contractor and County agree, therefore, to amend said Contract as specified below, while all other parts of said Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect: 1. Extension of Tera. Paragraph 3. (Term.) of the Contract is hereby amended by changing the termination date specified therein from September 30, 1975 to March 31, 1976. 2. PaNment Limit Increase. Paragraph 4. (Payment Limit) of the Contract is hereby amended by increasing the amount of the Contract Payment Limit specified therein by an additional $51,660 to a new total of $154,980. 3. Unit Rate Increase. Paragraph 1. (Amount) of the Payment Provisions is hereby amended, effective October 1, 1975, by increasing the amount of the flat unit rate (fee) specified therein from "$4.10 per unit" to "$4.30 per unit"; and Paragraph 3. (Service Unit), page 3, of the Service Plan is hereby amended, accordingly, by changing the amount specified therein from "$4.10" to "$4.30". 4. Chan&e in State and Federal Requirements. Paragraph 1. (Specific Compliance with Law) of the Special Conditions is hereby deleted (in order to comply with revised State and Federal requirements) and replaced by a new paragraph to read as follows: "1. Specific Compliance with Law. Without any limitation upon its obligations under Paragraph 1. (Compliance with Law), page 1, of the General Conditions, Contractor shall comply with all Federal and State regulations, circulars, orders, guidelines, and directives pertaining hereto, including Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter II, Part 228, under Title XX of the Federal Social Security Act, as amended, and California's Comprehensive Annual 3 Services Program Plan, Title XX, October 1, 1975 - June 30, 1976, with respect to "'Services to Disabled Individuals." 5. Donated Matching Funds. Paragraph 4. (Donated Matching Funds) of the Special Conditions is hereby deleted. 6. Performance Bond. Paragraph 7. (Performance Bond) of the Special Conditions is hereby deleted. 7. No Implication of Contract Renewal. The Special Conditions of this Contract are hereby amended by adding a new paragraph to read as follows: "8. No Implication of Contract Renewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation or implication whatsoever that this Contract shall be renewed; i.e., that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract or other such agreement following termination of the within Contract." 8. Reduction in Service Level. Paragraph 2.h., page 1, of the Service Plan is hereby amended by decreasing the number of enrollees specified to be served from "100 full-time equivalent enrollees each month" to "95 full-time equivalent enrollees each month". 9. Change in Enrollee Eligibility;. Paragraph 2.i. (Enrollee Eligibility), page 2, of the Service Plan is hereby amended effective October 1, 1975, by deleting subparagraph (3) regarding receipt of SSI/SSP by enrollees. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00168 0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19. 76 In the Matter of Contract Numbers 24-040-2 and 24-041-2 to Provide Professional Services at the George Miller, Jr. Memorial Centers for Developmentally Disabled Children IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following contracts with the individuals named below to continue the provision of professional speech therapy and language development services for developmentally disabled children at the George Hiller, Jr. Memorial Centers, East and West, from January 1, 1976, through June 30, 1976, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contracts: CONTRACTOR CONTRACT NUMBER TERM PAYMENT LIMIT Janet C. Furby 24-040-2 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 $4,211 Joan Lefevre 24-041-2 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 $4,211 Passed by the Board on February 3. 1976 I hereby caMfy that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supenrsom cc: County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February 19 Y County Auditor-Controller 1 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Medical Services/ By Deputy Clerk Mental Health Contractors Crai ©0169 N 24 ARS lOM ---------- . ...... Contra Costa County Standard Forml".L,�``�'-"1 STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. !lumber 2 4 - 0 40 - 2_ Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Professional speech therapy services for developmentally disabled children at George Miller, Jr. Memorial Center, West 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: JANNET C. FURBY Capacity: Self-employed speech therapist Address: 45 Meernaa Avenue, Fairfax, California 94930 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is January 1, 1976 and it teraainates June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. Comty's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed 4,21r- 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions ns attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that Work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by _ reference: Agreement r'75-53275 ti-ith the State Department of Health 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Title I (P.L. 89-313) 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA.� CONTRACTOR By J. P. Kenny By airman, Board 61 S • ors X-,ar;t��2e Vli/l Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk Design official caphciin bus' ess and affix corporation seal) By ! State of California ) ss. Y ,I14 Deputy County of Contra Costa } ACKPIOWLEDGEM IT (CC 1290.1) Recommended by Department The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and usiness capacities, personally appeared By before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: County Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. Dated: 2 7 By, Deputy • MeWwlyrQt/Deputy Co ty C j (A-4617 REEV 5/75) Ml Croprn v::ti, �cnr� orA2r, Contra Costa County Standard Form, a i PAYlSc."iT PROYISZO;KS 1 (Fee Basis Contracts) C� j Number 4 - 0 4 0 — 2 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only_] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [X] b. $ 8.00 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided hereunder. 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered_ Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. . Initials: ' — AP Contractor County Dept. (A-4619 REV 6/75) �0 r ri Contra Costa County Standard Form GEN-ERA'" 'CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) C (�j Number 2 4 — L! A .q " 2 i 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, i hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized c representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. i 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and crake available for inspection by authorized i representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are c=p-lete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. S. Termination. f a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements When entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that Which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any wanner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein, Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially charge the Payment Provisions or the Seriice Plan. Initials: TF Contractor Coun('try Dept. (A-4616 REV 5/7S) -1- on /2 h Contra Costa County Standard Form f GENERAL CONDITIONS i (Pu-"'chase of Services) Number 24 -- 0 0 - 2 herein. inrormal Eby __. ,.*,I- J .,, the County Department for which this Contract is made or his demos $. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments- This Contract may be modified or, amended bea written i ten o document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Pr subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval- b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment e t toany executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such adm2nistrative ly charge the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. amendments may not material Initials: Contractor F0unty Dept. on 12 (A-4616 REV 5/75)LM �1� _�__ -...._.,. .,. ._..._,�_�....-r.....-...---«_... ..........----..- Contra Costa County Standard Form GEVERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 4 { C� Humber 2 — A- 0 — 2 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State reEulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. i 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or t monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. - 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent t contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or 'Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: r Contractor County Dept. (A-4616 REV 5/75) -2- mom Contra Costa County Standard Form CSE! _RAL1 CONDITIONS Our-rdhasv of Services) 18. flondi.scriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to al2 qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or inj=y to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modifications thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices providedd for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 551 Pine Street, Martinez, California. 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other^ delivery. 22. Pr%macy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. JW Initials: Contractor County Dept. (A-4615 PZv Slzs) 011.174 -3- q Mwi{`1 1 Number 24 - 040 - 2 i SPECIAL CONDITIONS Insurance. Paragraph 20. (Insurance), page 3, of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. SERVICE PLAN Service To Be Provided. The Contractor shall provide professional speech therapy services in language development as required by County Medical Services. Contractor shall provide such services under the direction of County's Pre-School Supervisor (Staff Nurse II) to developmentally disabled children, age 3 months through 3 years, for up to 12 children at a time in the Pre-School Activity Infant Stimulation Program operated by County at its George Miller, Jr. Memorial Center, West (2801 Hilltop Drive, Richmond). Contractor's services shall include, but not be limited to, instruction for said children in the following areas: 1. Language development.. 2. Speech development and acquisition. 3. Sensory stimulation. 4. Speech and gesture modeling S. Reinforcement of progressive approximations of words, appropriate responses and imitations, and appropriate responses to commands. 6. Development of the muscles of the face and mouth through feeding techniques. 7. Other developmental training and educational activities as required by County Medical Services. Contractor acknowledges that she is qualified to provide the aforesaid professional speech therapy services in language development. Schedule. During the term of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide services hereunder at those times and on those days as shall be established by mutual agreement between the Contractor and County Medical Services. Equipment, Supplies, and Materials. County shall provide Contractor with such facilities, equipment, supplies, and materials as are necessary for the provision of services hereunder. Eligibility. Contractor shall provide services to eligible children who are specified by County and who are enrolled in County's Pre-School Activity Infant Stimulation Program identified above. Service Unit. One unit of service for payment purposes shall be defined as the provision of services as specified above for one (1) full hour and shall be paid at the fee-rate of $8.00 per unit. Initials: Contractor County Deist. 00175 4 1 Contra Costa County Standard Form STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Dumber 2 4= " AIL r 2 Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Professional instructional services in language development for develop- mentally disabled children at George Miller, Jr, Memorial Center, East 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: JOAN LEFEVRE Capacity: Self-employed language development instructor Address: 8136 Arroyo Drive, 13, Pleasanton, California 94566 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is January 1, 1976, and it terminates June 30, 1976, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed 4,211 S. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. B. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Agreement 175-53275 with the State Department of Health 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000 Elementary and Secondary Education Act, Title I (P.L. 89-313) 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNT`_' Or CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA COln?ACTOR FEB 3 =G By'f J. P. Kenny sty ,c, iirman, Board G S Ors Attest: J. R. Olsson, County erk Desi ate officiaWcapacity in business and affix corporation seal) State of California ) ss. 4 Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.2) Recomme ded by Department The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared By before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: County Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. 6a 444b.. Dated: l By Deputy /Deputy ounty CMY76 MILrOtllffla:: ti:i� : C;r�fC� vlCtL': (A-4617 REV 5/75) ly I Contra Costa County Standard Form i PAYAlE.`iT PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) CC�� Humber � M moi- 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] S j a. $ monthly, or jX] b. $ 5.00 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or ( j c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for an services, work, and expenses provided hereunder. t r 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. s 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed o.- refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: OY / Co tractor Coulhtk Dept. (A-4619 BEV 6/75) 0M mooing[ r Contra Costa County GENZRAL CONDITIOjYS Standard Form (Purchase of Services) Number 2 4 — o ,a wi rh F ��''�i�r�t t., ar I nn -%7V ' th X71 F i y.�7 (A-4619 REV 6/75) MW i Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS ' (Purchase of Services) 3 j Humber 24 - 041 - 2 1. Compliance With Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local la:is and regulations applicable With respect to its performance hereunder, fincluding but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions o: employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized 4 representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents R pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (Whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State o: California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Spe=ifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a Written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. Initials: Q4 tractor, County Dept. (A-4616 REV 5/75) -2- N 1 %8 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL COUDI T IONS (Purchase of Services) Number 24-- 0 41 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government_ 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the terra hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any pubic officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person Will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: v kl QOfitractor County Dept. 00179 (A-4616 REV 5/75) -2- Contra Costa County Standard Form Gr"2r'P.4L CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 77 Kumber 2 4 — 0 Q 3 18. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies :meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Comoensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by thea shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: Co actor Co Dept.- (A-4616 REV 5/75) 0015 -3- E r Number 24 — 0 4 1 i 2 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Insurance. Paragraph 20. (Insurance), page 3, of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. SERVICE PLAN Service To Be Provided. The Contractor'shall provide professional instructional services in language development as required by County Medical Services. Contractor shall provide such services under the direction of County's Pre-School Supervisor (Staff Nurse 11) to developmentally disabled children, age 3 months through 3 years, for up to 12 children at a time in the Pre-School Activity Infant Stimulation Program operated by County at }_ its George Miller, Jr. Memorial Center, East (3020 Grant Street, Concord). Contractor's services shall include, but not be limited to, instruction for said children in the following areas: 1. Language development. 2. Speech development and acquisition. 3. Sensory stimulation. 4. Speech and gesture modeling. S. . Reinforcement of progressive approximations of words, appropriate responses and imitations, and appropriate responses to commands. 6. Development of the muscles of the face and mouth through feeding techniques. 7. Other developmental training and educational activities as required by County Medical Services. Contractor acknowledges that she is qualified to provide the aforesaid professional instructional services in language development. Schedule. During the term of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide services hereunder at those times and on those days as shall be established by mutual agreement between the Contractor and County Medical Services. Equipment. Supplies, and Materials. County shall provide Contractor with such facilities, equipment, supplies, and materials as are necessary for the provision of services hereunder. i Eligibility. Contractor shall provide services to eligible children who are specified by County and who are enrolled in County's Pre-School Activity Infant Stimulation Program identified above. Service Unit. One unit of service for payment purposes shall be defined as the provision of services as specified above for one (1) full hour and shall be paid at the fee-rate of $8.00 per unit. Initials: Coefractor County tept. 031 S1 F-- a i i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Agreement for Sale of Certain Tax-Deeded Land to the Moraga School District Mr. E. W. Leal, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, having submitted an agreement between the County of Contra Costa, the Moraga School District, and the State of California, for the sale, pursuant to Section 3791 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached to said agreement and made a part thereof, which has been sold to the State for non- payment of taxes to the Moraga School District for $390; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing b o true and correct copy of an order entered on the n►inutes of said Board of Supervrsom on the daft aforesaid. Orig: Administrator Wftm my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Tax Collector (6) mixed f 3rd day of pebruary , 19 76 Auditor-Controller (Moraga School District J. R. OISSON, Clerk (State of California By ( Deputy Clerk c/o Tax Collector Ma' Crale ()0 CA H 24 8/75 IOU i 0.4 AGR-.-mMT TO PURCHASE TAX D.=.SD?.D M11D THIS A rRMENT, made this 3 day of FEB , 29 76 , by and between the Board of Suaerl*isors of the Countf of Contra Costa, State of California, and the Moraga School District, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Fart 6, Chap ter 8, of the Revenue and Taxation rode. HITis ESS STN : T.TUT HM4S, the real property situated within the Town of fforaga, County . of Contra Costa, State of California, hereinafter set forth and described in :Rchibit "A", attached hereto and nade a part hereof, has beez deeded to the Ster e or California for the non-p4;r.-.ent of delinquent taxes; and : MMIS, such deed to the State for taxes includes taxes levied by the Moraga. School District, the tax-es of which on the property are collected by the County officers; Hai, TOR?FORE, it is nutually a^reed as fo'_1cHs: 1. That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the cost of giving notice of this a�re=ent shall be paid for by the .foraga School. District; 2. That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa agrees to sell to said :YoraYa School District and said ::oraga School District agrees to purchase from said County the property hereinafter set out in the aforesaid ZyJiibit "?t", uhich shall not ha-re been redeemed as provided in the Revenue and Taxation Code, upon pay lent by said listarict to the `f?x Collector of said County the sum set forth in said Dchibit "A" after the descriptioa of 4he property and desioated "zsrchase Price", withi+-i 30 days after this adreanznt becones effective. 3. That said Roraga. School District will not :,hare in the distribution of the payment required by this aZrre.:ant. Microfilmed with board ozder 911,53 k SII I3� IT?.TSSS wH-PPztM- ?', the parties hereto have caused their respective napes- to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by Nlicrofitm ed .with board order T-183 X83 IN WITP s.S WHER- F, the parties hereto have caused their respective naaees to be hereiu:to subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. ATTZST: O W OF SUPEMSORS OF M. COUNT OF CCU COSTA FEB -3 1976 R OLSMN f (I, P. Kenny Cleric of Board of Supervisors Chairman By 4 6 el�g De ty (Seal.) MORML SCHOOL DISTRICT ./ -s-s�Gt2-t Sec z BY esi t This agreeaent was submitted to me before execution by the Board of i Supervisors and I have co apared the sane with the records of the younty- of Contra Costa relating to the real property described therein. SHARD W. LEAL 4,& County Tax Collector &PP3O1T=.7 this day of 19 D'_ ;.-TH CORY, STATE r..TY_MI.OLLER 3y 00154 I s I . • chibit "As .. T��,r } jam w.SALE _11,, `C.FURCIIiiyiS ,k 3 si:2 Y:+�11 I 11 11 :�Yi' can ,,riLiLFI li ,F Y� lesCt L� ,y �w �; -v �1 ,, , 0M.00 r, ; , DS. �ii��TIQ '' ` k ,;4"'. Parcel No. 25?-3S2-001 '' , 11 :, x� � Portion of the Rancho Laguna ;�e �.na De Los Palos Colorados, described.as11 follows:: 5 I. Beginning on the northwesterly line of mer Drive at the most southerly-corner, of Lot lsl, as said Lot and Drive are delineated on the �p entitled Subdivision , 'A 3310 which mop was Med on Har 13, 1965, in book lUt of Daps at page 26 Contra Costa County records; thence from said point of beginning North 670'03r 081 l; ?Fest, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 41, 110.00 feet to the mostr westerly corner thereof; thence South 22o 56'52" ':est, 25.00 feet to the utost northerly corner of Lot ls2, as delineated on the map above referred to• thence South 670 03' 08" East, along the northeasterly line of said Lot W, 110.00 feet to-the northwesterly line of said Rimer TIrive; thence IIorth` 220 561` 52n East, along said northwesterly line of Rimer Drive, 25.00 feet to the point of K beginning. 4,, ;Y _ t`,. I.#j x ,'k;Y ,' y sa 41 r, tC- 1' x 1 '' '��. r 1ytN # Y t :" : '` � g! c - x �..Ka 4� z Y 'a ayt,. 1; , p �� y ' ' S iR 1 z; 4 drti 41 v i 4 Z, °' ` ''�F% at q, t 1, j ., U&f ku i'�� i J Y jC �4� z r x¢°, . 5, 41 {, f}�Kg ,,," A" - Y$'r P U,— x gx3 cJ ,, "mss 5 �' r _ a` +r ' -�. . -� k;I t a+r �, . 'S Y 'Y 11 I y..to a, .... .. I 7]l5CA�12\0}'AEitO • 1' C) ItC]1;1i& • A1Z,IE:AGA.CAIII01:.ti1A9.ti56 • 1»1Sj37f,-53i3 GEORGE IA.RENWORTH Sul«Y+n2rndcYt2 ROURT W.1RASK In%tru'.laon AIIAN K.\IGUM .�d+un»tausar k-r�,tati .— RESOLUTION 75-8 AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE EASEMENT FROM RIMER DRIVE TO JOAQUIls MQRAGA SITE WHEREAS_, parcel number 257-392-001 is scheduled for sale through sealed bid on February 9, 1976, as tax deeded property, and, WHEREAS, this parcel was specifically set aside by the developer as an easement as an access route for school children to the Joaquin Moraga intermediate School site, and. WHEREAS, such specification of said easement was a condition of approval of the development of the sub-division by the County Planning Commission, and, WHEREAS, the school district has considered itself to be the-wesner of said easement since 1965 and has exercised such amership by fencing, landscaping, and maintaining said parcel since that time, and, WHEREAS, water meter and supply lines have been installed through this easement and have been in continuous use for several years, and. WHEREAS, school children in order to mitigate the danger of traffic and vehicular congestion along Camino Pablo have used this access daily through regular and su:rnter school sessions since September 1966, and, WHEREAS, loss of the use of said parcel by the Moraga School District would represent a severe handicap to the safety and welfare of pupils assigned to this school and there would be a considerable expense to the district to relocate the water meter and lines, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Governing Board of the Moraga School District objects to the sale of said property as property tax-deeded to the State of California, and, THAT the Moraga School .District agrees to purchase said parcel for no less than the minimu.;t bid, and. THAT the Moraga School District agrees to pay publication costs. 001S15 i I RESOLUTION 75-$ Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Governing Board of the Moraga School District of Contra Costa County. California on January 27, 1976. by thefollowing vote: AYES: David Goodman, Constance Hueser, Haridei Houlton, Sandra Hilt NOES: None ASSENT: Martha Ball 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly -introduced. passed and adopted by- the members- of the Governing Board of the Moraga School District at the public meeting of said Board held on. January 27. 1976; and that the foregoing is an excerpt from the journal of said Governing Board for said meeting. George H. Reriwor'th, Secretary to the Governing Board, Moraga School District In the Boar! of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California t 0V15'7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Agreement for Sale of Certain Tax Deeded Land to the City of Antioch Mr. E. W. Leal, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, having submitted an agreement between the County of Contra Costa, the City of Antioch, and the State of California, for the sale, pursuant to Section 3791 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached to said agreement and made a part thereof, which has been sold to the State for non-payment of taxes to the City of Antioch for $550; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Agreement for Sale of Certain Tax Deeded Land to the City of Antioch Mr. E. W. Leal, County Treasurer-Tax Collector, having submitted an agreement between the County of Contra Costa, the City of Antioch, and the State of California, for the sale, pursuant to Section 3791 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, of certain property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached to said agreement and made a part thereof, which has been sold to the State for non-payment of taxes to the City of Antioch for $550; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same. Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976 1 hereby certifp that the foregakV is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dale aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Administrator Supe cc: Tax Collector (6) affixed "_3z—day 1Df 2Ph= a=,, , 19 _ZL Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk (City of Antioch By, , Deputy Clerk (State of California c/o Tax Collector Mar Craig, H 2 aR5 IOM 001VS i i AGR:.'EIrr TO PURR-;.;iASE TAX D3.MM PROMMI VaS AaRE=- M hT, made this I_ day or FEB , 29 76 , by and between the Board of Sunerricors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and the City of Antioch, pursuant to the provisions of Division I, Part o, Chapter 8, of the Revenue and Taxation ;one. W I T i S S S E T H : TsiAT !rzMZ-ft,S, the real property situated wi.tain the Cit;; of rntioch,-Gounty of Contra Costa, State of California, hereinafter set forth and described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and-made a part hereof, has been deeded to the Stdle of California for the non-payment of delinquent t.-nes; and V.!M'V,S, such deed to the State for taxes includes taxes levied by the City of Antioch, the taxes of which on the property are collected by the County officers; tQyi, TIER?..=On, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the cost of giving notice of this agreenent shall be paid for by the City of Antioch; 2. That the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa agrees to sell to said City of Antioch and said City of Antioch agrees to purchase froze said County the property hereinafter set out in the aforasa:i.d Exhibit "A", which Shall not have been redeemed as provided in the revenue and Taxation Code, upon payment by said City to the Tax Collector of said County the sun set forth in said xhibit "A;" after the description of the property and designated "Purchase "rice", within 30 days after his agree;.---tt beco es effective. 3. That said City of Antioch will notshare in the distribution of the paynent required by this agrce.xennt. OU1J9 - Miaof,Emed with board order 2 their respective names IU es , SS .frMW; the psrties hereto have caused to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by 00189 - Microfilmd with board order s x, IN WmIESS . &ME0; the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. , ATTEST: BOLRD OF MPrMWSORS OF THE COMUr OF C0�':TRA COSTA J! R'01SSON Clerk ,of ncard of Supervisors FEB 3 -1976 By - By J Kenny 1(lcr; Gn;g Beputy Chairman (Seal) A?TBST: CM OF .4:ITiOCIi ZI A."In CXty Clerk .Mayor ' (Seal) This agreement was submitted to me before execution.by the, Board. of Supervisors, and I have compared the same with the records of the County'of Contra Costa relating to the real property described therein. EDu-APD M. LEAL fA'h'I.M't& County Tau Collector " PZ ..D this day of , 14 iceN ri CrAff, STA`L'E G(r,T.ROLLER By n E Mbit "A" FIRST MR, SALE PURCHASE DMDIQUENT ?Ipe' B PRICE 1968-69 54 $5%.00. DESCRIPTION: Parcel No. 068-161-017 The Southerly 792 feet of the Westerly 20 feet of Lot 2, as said Lot is designated on the asap entitled "Tregallas Tract, Contra Costa County, Californ;a,'R which map was filed in the office of the Recorder of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, on January 14, 1924, in Volume 18 of Yaps, at page h33. f RESOLUTION NO. 76/15 RESOLUTION OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE OF TAX DELIRQUENT PROPERTY WHEREAS notice has been received that the Tax Collector of Contra - Costa County proposes to hold a Sealed Bid Sale February 9, 1976, of f tax delinquent properties and; , WHEREAS Parcel Number 068-161-017 within the City of Antioch is proposed to be included in said sale and; WHEREAS the private ownership of said parcel would be detrimental to the public welfare; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Antioch hereby objects to inclusion of Assessor's Parcel Number 068-161-017 in said sale and requests that said parcel be deleted from the proposed sale; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Antioch hereby applies to t the County of Contra Costa to purchase said property pursuant to Chapter 8 (Section 3771 et seq) Revenue and Taxation Code. The.foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Antioch at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13th day of January, 1976 by the following vote: AYES: Council '!embers Parsons, !--Zhiatley, Aguilar and rsayor Giersch HOES: Mone ABSENT: None OOP,OTHY P. City Clerk t 0Ol92 i C � In the Board of Supervisors o1 Contra Costa County, Stat: of California February 3 19 2E In the Mcner of Approval of Contract with Criminal Justice Research Foundation for Evaluation of Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Criminal Justice Research Foundation for evaluation of the Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program from January 1, 1976 to June 30, 1976 at a cost not to exceed $20,998. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orlg: Probation Oepartnt Witness m cc: County Probation Officer Y hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 3rd day of February 1976 c/o Probation Officer - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller , {% County Administrator rFf. Irl e4ufl L1,45_18 Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 • ls4A IIe ©0193 JHB t v , Contra Costa County Standard Form STANDARD CC:::TF A6 (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Id_=.__ication. Number 35014-316-729-2310 )epart:-_e=_: probation Subject: _;:luation of Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program 2. Parties. The Cc=-- __ Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the folic::_=_ named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Criminal Justice Research Foundation Capacity: California non-profit corporation Address: Arlen Bean, Research Director 2129 Hacienda Hay, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95825 3. Tera. The effective date of this Contract is January 1, 1976 and it terTunates June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Pa ent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed 15 ZO,998 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program Office of Criminal Justice Planning Grant #1954-2 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Section 31000 and 26227 Penal Code Section 1203.14 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR :!, P4 KeWY. By �_ BY l_ O r_fi lli1�- airman, Board f7rvi,sorsYE6 3 1976 .+ Attest: J. R. Olsson, County ClerkDesignate offic2al capacity in business and affix corporation seal) E, '' :' + /r . State of California ss. L Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) £eco..amended by DepFa*tment The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared By i .• ,t�.i, ` ' Z„ before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: County Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. Dated: { ?si„✓�,� , ? i i�Co By 'tjif. Depu001 04 ty � 1V aOfilnled With boom c'C:� O_rer•: Contra Costa County Standard Fora PAYH i PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 35014-316-729-2310 Payme= =his. Ca-mty shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in the tc- moi:::= specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject tC _._= Payment ; =- �, iz s the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to �:;n=ractor for == services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs tha. a=* allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2. Payment Amos--=s. Subject to later adjustments in total paycaznts in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor: [Check, one alternative only.] L ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [X] c. An aunt equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allarable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] . [ ] a. General Services Administration Federal Kanagement Circular FMC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Ccntracts Y.izh State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost), and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2). Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or LX] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allowable costs. s 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in acdordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand form D-15 and in the manner and forst prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Initials: Contractoro ty Dept. 00195 .Contra Costa County - Standard Farm FnZovlSIct:S C (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 35014-316-729-2310 in acdordance with Z- I-- ,.L, -- on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and fora prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 2_ (Payment Amounts) above. Initials: Contractor .-Co ty Dept. OQ�95 � . ,Contra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT koyiTSIGNS (Cast Basis Contracts) Number 35014-316-729-2310 5. Right _, Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor in the o= of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's per= —ice, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently %-_2:=_--r_-aced, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish informat__m _r to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or :__�^^�, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand;=) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expresses by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County _ pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Exception. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Fudits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or co plying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting front any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to per;o= properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Q Initials: Co actor Co " y Dept. 00196 It........... K Contra Costa County Standard Form G "tERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Number 35014-316-729-2310 Zompliance -:_:w Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, Sta__ = local la,s regulations. applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, incl::=_=g but not =_ =e: :a, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions =5 = _ loyment. 2. Inspection. ___=_=ctor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are s-_.:-_=z to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the Cc_nty, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. b. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. S. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County ,administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. ll'•y Initials: l Contractor /,? ty Dept. Contra Costa County Standard Form GENEIAL CC:;`1T1O'IS (Purchase of Services) Number 35014-316-729-2310 G. Disputes. Disagree=ents between the County and Contractor concerning the meaa:: , requireze=s, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final deter7iration in :__rag by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is male or his des_-e. or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the S:-.e or Federal Government. 10. Law Govern__= :=tract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and constr in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance wi.^ Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: o a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in.connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: Contractor �JLDeppt. 00198 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Number 35014-316-729-2310 :5. .:ondisc.='=--':.a:ory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under :..:s Contras: shy be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, :ace, religio=, :=:cr, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnifica_? :he Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or -,',-,.-.Jury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modificat on ereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance namin the County and its officers and employees as additional Insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $2509000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $1009000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. ' All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing.and may be dem by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c% Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, SS1 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor &ftty Dept. 00199 l i SPECIAL COHOITIONS Number 35014-316-729-2310 cetera 20. Insurance of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. Initials: Contractor C my Dept. 00 102WQO SERVICE PLAN Number 35014-316-729-2310 Contractor shall operate its evaluation program in accordance with "Office of Criminal Justli:c_ Planning Standard Third Party Contract Provisions" (Exhibit A, Pages), "A P—::sal to Evaluate the Adult Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Project" (Exh;51_ 3, 41 pages, and Office of Criminal Justice Planning Grant w1954-2 as appr;, =-,-- b_y County which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference. CN Initials: e1' C Contractor my Dept. 00201 r EXHIBIT A OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING STANDARD THIRD PARTY CONTRACT PROVISIONS I. Compliance with Grant Award. Contra Costa County, hereafter referred to as :�.:bgrantee, and the Orrice of Criminal Justice Planning, hereafter referred :c as OCJP, enzerea into a grant award, # 1454-2 here- a=ter referre_ as "grant award." Said grant award is incorporated in the within Agreeimen:. It is expressly understood and agreed that Subgrantee will retain ul:i-a_e control and responsibility for the grant award project and the Contrac: =grees to be bound by the teras and conditions of said grant award appli==zie to Subgrantee in the conduct of the project. 2. Compliance with Fiscal Requirements. The Contractor agrees to perform under this Agreement in accordance wit all terms and conditions contained in the OCJP Fiscal Affairs Manual and the financial guidelines prescribed by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (hereafter referred to as LEAA) and the OCJP. 3. Asst nment or Subcontracting. No performance of this Agreement or any portion ,thereot may be assign or subcontracted by the Contractor without the express written consent of Subgrantee and any attempt by the Contractor to assign or subcontract any performance of the terms of this Agreement without the express written consent of Subgrantee shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Whenever the Contractor is authorized to subcontract or assign, he will include all the terms of this Agreement in each such subcon- tract or assignment. 4. Assurance of Compliance with Civil Rights Laws. The Contractor hereby assures that it will comply with it e VI of t e Cavi Rights Act of 1964 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to regulations of the Department of Justice and the LEAA issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall, on .the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this Agreement or under any project, program, or activity supported by this Agreement. The Contractor will comply with Justice Department Equal Employment Regulations in federally-assisted programs (28 CFR Part 42, Subpart D) to the end that employment discrimination in such programs on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The Contractor recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement of the foregoing covenants against discrimination. If this Agreement provides for payment to the Contractor in excess of $10,000, the Contractor shall comply with Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as supplemented. The Contractor shall be required to have an affirmative action plan which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis 'of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementation of equal employment. 5. Maintenance and Inspection of Contractual Records. The Contractor agrees that the Subgrantee, the OCJP, Me LM, the__Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives shall hay a access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the Contractor, involving transactions relating . to this Agreement. Such material must be kept and maintained for a period of three years after termination of the grant award or until an audit is completed by OCJP and LEAA and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, whichever is sooner. The Contractor agrees to keep and maintain all records required by the Fiscal Affairs Manual, the financial guidelines prescribed by LEAH, and any other records that may be required by other laws or regulations of Federal, state or local government units. i MW EXHIBIT A 6. C-_=yrights and Rights in Data. Where activities supported by this Agreement produce original computer programs, writing, sound recordings, pictorial re- productions, drawings or other graphical representation and works of any sFnilar na.sr= (the term computer programs includes executable computer programs an:j support:-: data in any form) , the OCJP, the LEAA, and Subgrantee reserve zne right to ::se, 4-uplicate and disclose, in whole or in part, in any manner for any purpose "_-_ver, and to authorize others to do so. If the material is subject to ccYs-'g _, the Subgrantee reserves the right to copyright such and the Contractor agree= -o_ to copyright such material. if the material is copyrighted, the OCJP and the _7AA reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproc_ze, publish, and use such materials, in the whole or in part, and to authorize others to do so. 7. Publications. Both the OCJP and the Subgrantee reserve the right to require the Contractor not to publish, and the Contractor thereupon shall refrain from publishing original books, manuals, films or other copyrightable material produced by activities supported by this Agreement, whether copyrighted or not, that may be designated by the OCJP or the Subgrantee. Such right shall be exercised by addressing written notice to that effect to the Contractor. Before publishing any materials produced by activities supported by this Agreement, the Contractor shall notify Subgrantee and OCJP sixty days in advance of any such publication, if the Subgrantee and OCJP fail to exercise the right to prohibit publication as set forth above within sixty days of the receipt of the notice of intent to publish, the Contractor may publish said material. The Contractor shall furnish twenty copies of the materials so published to Subgrantee and OCJP. Any such publication by the Contractor shall include on the title page the following standard disclaimer: "The preparation of these materials was financially aided through a Federal grant from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended. The opinions, findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration or the Office of Criminal Justice Planning." "OCJP reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use these materials, and to authorize others to do so." 8. Patents. If any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or as a result of work performed under this agreement, the Contractor shall refer the discovery or invention to Subgrantee and OCJP. The Contractor hereby agrees that determinations of rights to inventions or discoveries made under this Agreement shall be made by LEAA, or its duly authorized representative who shall have the sole and exclusive powers to determine whether or not and where a patent application should be filed and to determine the disposition of ail rights in such inventions or discoveries, including title to and license rights under any patent application or patent which may issue thereon. The determination of LEAH, or its duly authorized representative, shall be accepted as final, The Contractor agrees and otherwise recognizes that LEAH, OCJP, and Subgrantee shall acquire at least an irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free' license to practice and have practiced throughout the world for governmental purposes any invention made in the course of or under this Agreement. 9, Contractor Work Hours and Safety Standards. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess o $2,500 2,000 for construction contracts) and involves the employment of mechanics or laborers, the Contractor agrees: a) That each mechanic or laborer will have wages computed on the basis of a standard work day of eight hours and a standard work week of forty hours. Work in excess of the standard work week or day is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at the rate of not less than one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of eight hours in any calendar day or forty hours in the work week; b) That no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under construction safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor by regulation (29 CFR 1518). These requirements do not 2 00203 :r EXHIBIT A apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 10. Clean Air Act. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess of $100,000, :ire Contrac;:.r agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations iss_ed pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970. Violations shall be reported _c 'JCJP and the regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency. U. Public Availab! 17:y of Information. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements or =-c:ions 6250 through 6260 of the Government Code of the State of California acid the LEAA Guide for Comprehensive Law Enforcement Planning and Action Grants relating to the availability to the public oM entiiable records or of er documents that are pertinent to the receipt or expenditure of LEAA funds. 12. Security and Privacy. •(a) The Contractor agrees that, except as provided by federal law other than the Crime Control Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. Sections 3701 et seq.), none of its officers or employees shall use or reveal any research or statistical information furnished by any person and identifiable to any specific private person for any purpose other than the purpose for which It was obtained. Copies of such information shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceedings. (b) Criminal history information: (1) The term "criminal history information" includes records and . related data, compiled by law enforcement agencies for purposes of identifying criminal offenders and alleged offenders and maintaining as to such persons summaries of arrest, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, rehabilitation and release. (2) If the Contractor utilizes "criminal history information," the Contractor shall comply with the following: Ail criminal history information collected, stored, or disseminated shall contain, to the maximum extent feasible, dispositions as well as arrest data where arrest data is included therein. The collection, storage, and dissemination of such information shall take place under procedures reasonably designed to insure that all such Information is kept current therein; the Contractor shall assure that the security and privacy of all information is adequately provided for and such information shall only be used for law en- forcement and criminal justice and other lawful purposes. In addition, an individual who believes that criminal history information concerning him contained in an automated system is inaccurate, in- complete, or maintained in violation of the Crime Control ,Act of 1973, shall, upon satisfactory verification of his identity, be entitled to review such information to obtain a copy of it for the purpose of challenge or correction. (c) Any person violating the Security and Privacy provisions of this Contract or of the Crime Control Act oF 19732U.S.F. Section 3771 (c)] or any rule, regulations, or order issued thereunder, shall be fined not to exceed $10,000 in addition to any other penalty imposed by law. (d) The contractor assures that the foregoing provisions of the Security and Privac clause shall be incorporated into all of its subcontracts. 3 �9 EXHIBIT A 13. "Adequate Competition. All procurement transactions regardless of whether negotiated or advertised and without regard to dollar valueshall be conducted in a manner so as to provide maximum open and free Should be alert to orsanizational conflicts of interest ortion. The noncompetit►vetee Practices a-Onq contractors which may restrict or eliminate competition or 0zherwise res;,rain trade. Contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, s-='te�-nts of work and/or RFPs for a proposed procurement shall. be excluded .-,.., bidding or submitting a proposal to compete for the award Of such procures-en y } x ' { a x A � P l r fF f, I 4 ,r EXHIBIT B 1 A PROPOSAL ! TO EVALUATE THE ADULT DRUG - ABUSE PRIFVENTION. AND TREATMENT PROJECT i 1 I . i SUBMITTED I BY 1 CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2129 HACIENDA WAY, SUITEA ! SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95825 (916) 488-4757 Mrcrofilmed with board order. 00206 _. i a CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESEARCH FOUNDATION 2929 HSA WAl(SUTE A SACRAMENM CAL V-C A 958Pa t9*D 4e8-4757 i November 19, 1975 Mr. Hen fox Contra Costa Probation Dept. 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Dear Mr. Pox: We are pleased to submit this proposal to conduct an evaluation of the Adult Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Project. Our proposal is based on the information supplied in the Request for Proposal, an exten- sive review of current literature, and our previous experience in con- ducting program and operations evaluation studies for other criminal justice and local government agencies. Our proposal is organized in a format consistent with that outlined in the Request for Proposal and contains six major sections: (1) intro- duction; (2) technical approach; (3) proposed workplan; (4) project schedule and cost estimates; (5) organization and staffing of the project team; and (6) corporate information. We have reviewed the Request for Proposal and accept the contractual stipulations described and will be willing to execute an agreement with the contracting agency which includes these provisions. It is to be expected that there will be a high level of interest in this project. we are sensitive to this interest and have incorporated within our proposal the level of control, review, evaluation, and documen- tation necessary to assure the department of an unbiased and thorough assessment of the project which will facilitate the transferability of viable aspects of the experiment. We sincerely believe that the qualifications of our firm and the capabilities of the proposed project team will assure the timely and successful completion of this important study. we have added Dr. Peinglass and Ms. Berkowitz as two special consultants for this project. Both have had extensive experience in evaluating drug treatment programs. i If you have any questions regarding our proposal or if you require additional information, please call me at (916) 488-4757. Yours truly, i Arlen Bean AB/k A NC>.-FV4[iOT[fW*N�CX14 O V J$/►1./ TABLE OF CONTENTS EME" Lain c . ,il..a. — vi uua i ,?o..4ani- stuuy. we have added Dr. Feinglass and Ms. Berkowitz as two special consultants for this project. Both have had extensive experience in evaluating drug treatment programs. 1 If You have any questions regarding our proposal or if you require additional information, please call me at (916) 488-4757. Yours truly, Arlen Bean AB/k A i�F#'dA'TE�K3N^F�MT GCY1t Q"A V PLANIC=M%' V F4S� NA LALV9lS Evz.Luano%, F(V■;,IArM! TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Letter of Transaittal - Table of Contents SECTIONI oUt`T' .................................... SECTIONII TECHNICAL APPY011 H.............................. 3-11 r SECTION III WOPM AN........................................ 8-20 SECTIONi- WORKJNili+ AMwLW AW.7iw7........................ 21-24 SECTION V ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING OF EVALUATION TEAM.... 25-36 SECTION VI CORPORATE INFORMATION........................... 37-4I r 4 i I 0020 i, 1 , I t,�> 11;)g, I, I -a ,�� I'll'� x .at "i r rr kt`a k'a+ a� �"+y'`.air. m }`j -"`�t v r, c a4 z r'1 2 t",S �a- J e �- < r t � kyr,° i,?c 'r- q p r,* r'11 k �r s11 3., s 3 P kr `+rfa. a ..7 4,11-°3 i t X'� ', s 't T, 3 a, '� Tro _. . �.rrt { } i. r } a r j ,� r, lll� "�, w a.. r;LWt.p"a F'a ;:y .ter r. n 1�}r ss�izr" �"�s .a l �, r, 4 X k s ,m a x -r r °" w 35,r rx, ,*� z Ni .,-,r(r,� .t is y Y ..'r. .11 1. x -c a r r7 t 1 >a„ .x WS x'�K'� " r `"SSv a>t4"�•r�a ,"rMt'>r-�r^r'Y'�. I,- X t"'; �' ,� x` a. k.3` ` '`..,•#M> try y,+i--yz' v*€ r.r- , �,Ill t s r+'�N,n .I i' r x .,.a -F s, .[ z .,r Ti re`r( rrrftr d'�,Y ,, `k,�h �:{ t11%, o a;� ck t �r r � � ; rta 'r, -.^s'�'�. 4F„d^ `",� ,iE ' +.+' k '"' ''fel-#' } e'dr'"s'r."' x` ,.e 1. 11 11 t T f t w. }y, i .}s c q*` �,�tu ta�3' 'a-a`rk z#t"'a'„k rye n � '7 ' ,.., i ft t :d L fr^M„f(y''y+z�.2,n* xi �,.r„-yjyJ" * `� u�: n.rg),+ ".F.b1 3`�J�, '� p'�-,rFrq a J4}rr ��"a�$s 2:'""' , «�11 ' $ `l l 'S' S SFA e ; ns- h zdl s �'t`ar r•Cr 'bsa xf''Skt i „r 4 nJ�s v ' d r ,�t'� r - ,"�pu'da.rp, l,1�� ' P P ts'� Nrr ` r t s'c`. r Yn k r ,, r��}� �i ,w* i. a€ s + y+ yri�, a ' a11 : e..� 7r , 4"I I I m� 11�i',.,. tor':t'ut- „+* °p �e:. .-+S "ra)a.;,'.lain y }S i,Y" 3,s'`+�LL t z -� r k a ..- .M r t `s-S c $.}r€.fid r,�, _ .sjG" W 5G" o r :.r a r z � a r.a�'+y.�y�. ry h}r; j "`" 'i Y`n ,��`�'t$�vz"t1 11 '!t" ^ �" t r r3^ ',f 9' ^c, tf.q k 1 S 1 Z , z "{ , x' p ` Ta # c?s y tis r}.+ $,�`r. "+1�` 7,k '1 N6 t �}�,'-4 fit a'I --r v t"I . �-,-,�,,�,,�':.......�,,?�,,�,�' e v ^ya S f + ' r # FrS, c f �r�isd .,. *A I .1 { I x,aI t* ,;% r 2 c.. �`A'� },`� y pr sr r,r 4 a," V7, k I e111, a 9 1 ., w L o xr atJ r.?}, -y r<Z �' i sa+ t v r # i � i' ,r �'S %, ' p�rb�' s w r a n µ" I �, Mgr �. , h „y rt` a "a*,Y,#,r 4.�'{ - air{,ztf .Fh-rzgx`.yI sx r er s *,rty ,than"° ,. r `sk-.�t, "L ..zY r i , d x '';� Jia c1t m a ^f '"T Xx't'' s �n . "a,A �t s .t�, ,�ii><.rte,'�"*au-...'3.�k. y� �" ,Sz�t �rw. 4-11 a, -amu r r a, �r rs-t. r r a e n s"r`-' y,` A, k F_ r r '` a,�„„ra' "�' .�� ,.m'"3 ? ,x6a�`"iy,��a+��b°Y• "n11 r.�, u»cx t 1: I �r.>t -hr''�" " ,,' `�Ili I `'' a�r7�•�da°t INTRODUCTION ,',- I 3 � t�� iza 4`r x s a.r .r t- t `''". � "?a,- '�' Ill,' '.`"',. 3 r .y ^.a-' Y �-x +gat'" 11 � bty.Ib ,x ` T E sv''' A aT a a'` 'k q `' t '� : t �; k s a rry"r a yk �r"L ti . i al y r fir. a ft s. ;I R 3yr$r:n N J t�"' 1 i r k" agar- h 6 r fi'�s= } vk'rA"s r '7,w' x ,, r �,'` P X x r u ,} `y if}a vii,* "r"y,. .y i fs}'t .. r ak x # d 3 t .razf {may t e tSa a trrt t r^`"'Yv.s, }'��w "aY x rr f r�''�: a"a 5x „ p'r'11 � wf ' __±±e+'st n f w �z„ ., t s r f S ti saint rwr'F 3,t tt">x s` '''x�i�" ^#3s �i #t r. "a, _ r 4 a '"w.+. 3 '+ ur,xr 'vgzdk, r s2iw,`"nv� "u+"• �'� t ; ?fi, j s � „„v cry �.,`?" ,'ffin r � 't 'r z ,a-4"'�`+ �w ✓ y} a.._ �, f " v v ,, .kat`}" �� d .}n".c ,a it bi"�`'7 ,2rs+"ea, s`Ft3 , 141 g r �^,1. r r r, '" £ Hs I. ,°�' h:,1�1—f`r tt e F,^ ' � ... nst �" S�. m°r r .3*r;*t' y�",s. r a �,st` ac �,.,r +. r '-rW<`r ,c "' 4*t* +.3. a 3 ' k+� ..r j ' ri i ?, } x.}d-�k"�'1"x'+�'� ^;tr s''t 'r y„�r'`." �r,,.t" z zP ', r a t t t k xt e �� r, A +tk °�=xn 'z+'3"'`"`�' " af r t a.' }, a t< ,.'�^ wZ"A >~,-'".''' s S ^u '` n, 's+' w flr11 1' : a 73:f '} " a"a x.a z4.r.T" ` -s,' u- '+"Nt �.�' 'v�'r-r'` �`"}r?"r`.� ,�"�; z' 1. a^, z 4-{- t m - s P,q rr} 'ra` nass I "Ix c s z v # 'r § 6 dv ,�«. "s+F' 'd '"�'°' kt »His � "dy ', i „a* 'H �;��� t '.',s-,r t r 7 t L� ` x a - '':r y,: y ``�.*.+ 3 .' {�'�..`'�.+o-'�lg{` H._ f `^ n1. r- a ^r ¢s, '.r�S b k A `�f P"y' I �ac"4' ll% * e t , r r,, : r a max. ' ,., ,r �.`;y� a z ,, nc,+ ,. { r ,� r r rt° t. #'.mamma t`? ? y "x, rr ,t�S`5rx�ft ..iX r 1. e r. a, 7� s f .j, 4 T ,y Z r ,h` k !t Yj s3r t d f o- r .T s, t y rra `1. fr e .t1. C �t''((e r ff 4 N Y f ,� t �5 d� Y 5 ,�. R''yrx ,,ks s ti' �' z" s r AZ {J ) ,N� Y r7 ,F "rt t S i t.,x .r a 4- c'i,�'E' J _M k ; �, z :z v,.t Fr., a k} S^�,�r ,N., }d a. ar `� s~ a .+ r u �i^,,, r } V}w t �t s ti I J - rgltrP .� ¢ �a q �� ,, I k R'K SECTION I . INTRODUCTION The purpose of this proposal is to outline a coordinated research approach for evaluating the second grant year of the Contra Costa Adult Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Project. The methodology was developed, in part, from the knowledge we acquired of the project's purpose, service program, and long-tern goals over the past six months and our experience in several related programs. • Our evaluation plan will continue to utilize the basic data collection and case tracking system that was developed for the statistical analysis of objective data that was the primary focus of the first year's evalua- tion. This proposal expands the scope of the first year's evaluation to include an equally thorough assessment of the program's subjective process elements as required in the Request for Proposal. Some of the qualitative features of the project that will be examined are (1) appropriateness of treatment goals, (2) assessment of project staff, (3) management style and philosophy, (4) differenbes in the charac- ter and delivery of services. (S) distribution of staff time among various project activities, and (6) the staff's own assessment about the strengths and weaknesses of the program. 43ar methodology will allow us to account for the effects of locale, interaction with other agency programs, and results that may be caused by applying additional program resources or changing process variables. The _ methodology also makes provision for bringing into the evaluation, data on the client's perceptions of services and how treatment differs from that offered to the probationers in control caseloads. These subjective dimensions of the project will be closely inter- faced with the objective outcome data so that the project can be evaluated both from the standpoint of the results the project achieved as well as how and why it achieved those results. From our experience in evaluating a number of other related programs, we believe that the availability of ongoing technical assistance is often a key factor to the success of an experimental program. The initial work in organizing the ADAPT project is complete, but there are still several 1 areas where we think technical assistance from the evaluation staff can be used advantageously. :bather work in developing the training program and perfecting some tape of objective client classification scheme that can be used for further differentiating services are t,.o im:^ortant examples. A tears of highly qualified drug progran and evaluat?cn specialists has been assembled specifically to meet the broad regsi_e=ezts of this evaluation effort .and to give the project ongoing tec meal assistance. The team offers a wide minae a= shills and extensive exder:ance in evalu- ating these types of projects. s'he three ==:er team _.?c con-mleted the first yea='s evaluation will be supp2crientcd by Y.S. Pian Ber:towitz, a s Y f s {t t cri:ainal justice methodologist and Dr. Sanford Feinglass, a nationally recognized educator, author, and pharmacologist in the field of drug, abuse prevention and treatment. t: t� w _2_ 4211 I ` 4 I I .: �r'..y i F �, 1Ft+'it� rk�yY y+'J�rv +f �, z x '�,'Y t.L g,�'f%..�' di k J e s x,-1111 I ^`Ri r F T,Et V Y e a V a'�'yF i k r' JY r£ -,S -+ _ r J y xr 'v"3.',r ,- '�zi'" _ i","' 3 p, f +",M, V 4WMNYSM, �t , , t t� 7 s n h� t 4g,s'�' y t�r.v'" _ ri°l� '# 't ip l ;: r l WOMr a�Y� #s s x rF a 3 1 _ x,o, r r'rq,- s �, u / �`y - 4 y d --4--,—-r,, Y 3 ',� N 4 # ; i 8 - S I r �- �. . 4 f�' ; �� 1 T �x ,,. '_ x �.R� tNOs�*'.'^"' �,1s .r7. �n t'i`fi ,7 `a° a :;" } a f, wsi: s"'k' �.' r r i i v - 4m P r C R P d t x xk 4 a , r TECH��ICAL APPROACH 2 y b s W a � 4 c "a=. a X a ,t + `°`,�,'� }.it �„,�� ,�j" + •C,*rya 4 n s i ,: a .r 'Y,n� s a d _ 'i,,:' e ripq t i - d 'I , r 1F,,, r s{� r c' a'r �'-+ 1.- $ - ' # :r e .+; '' " t „Al�1 ,',,.I�w lrG,,i�G'� �r� t uzy r 4 r s s ; a 4 3a� r ars�✓ t Pa c k s4, r f illl _ �f ;t,r ` — �a,. ' v ,i,,� ,r W-50-0 1 rt �'Y -"r F q,, 4 G r_ C r .. �I . C � l ( t k F. f} Y'. H � yaf �wih W+."£L 3 a. N�" }: Y -�M 3 t"`' -x, ,)f-,0j;----,,:j,, �, r K t 7 3 � �� x. y I x e r y+ x d�e...y t��& Rr 4 kJ a $ 4 W - jI I �,��,�.� . " : - — - ,� -, , , I I 1: :::�"� �'� � �,-:��--, i� �",�,,�`:�- .-,�ll"��--"-,.'-"",-",��,-�l-""�"I'�TF I,1 o02 F f SECTION II . TECHNICAL APPROACH The evaluation plan for any program is formulated from the evaluator's perception of the program's rationale, the specific problems that are addressed, and how the probli,- are to be handled. As an introduction to the technical approach, we briefly summarize our perspective on the origin of the ADAPT project and the basic assumptions underlying the ex- periment. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT The Adult Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Project can be viewed as a departmental response to the growing number of adults being placed on probation for drug and narcotic-related offenses. The number of felony drug offenders granted probation in Contra Costa County increased about 55% between 1972 and 1974. Probation grants for fglony property increased 42% in the sawe period. 201 of which were estimated by the de- partment to be related to the use of drugs or to financing drug dependency. Prior to ADAPT, the supervision of drug offenders had been handled in every supervision unit of the adult division in caseloads of 120-145. With caseloads this size. services offered to drug offenders were very limited. There was not enough opportunity_ for the frequency of contact or to plan more supportive types of treatment which the department felt was necessary to maximize the offender's successful reintegration into the community. The department also recognized that few staff had the prerequisite training skills to supervise the expanding population of drug offenders effectively. In Contra Costa, like most counties, the traditional approach to drug abuse prevention and rehabilitation was represented by out-patient drug education and counseling centers or long-term residential 'therapeu- tic" communities. The department had concluded that the "success" rates of such programs was low in relation to their cost and that the nature of the treatment was not suitable for either supervising or rehabilitating the volume of offenders the department was required to handle. ADAPT, in the largest sense, represents an experiment designed to test whether coamanly available probation resources and field services can be strengthened to a point where probation can deal effectively with a large number of d nag offenders. in concept, ADAPT has identified certain ingredients which correctional theory accepts as being necessary to the construction and operation of successful field supervision and concen- trates the resources on a special target population of C—gproperty of- fenders. The wain i-igredients in the exaer;=ent are more -.wn--ol"Ier, training, better resource coordination, corxunity edrez_=o-, and having the ongoing researc', necessary to direct the project ds--i:.g its develop- mental stages. -3- 00#2"3 I I i EVALUATION OBJECTIVES The results of an experiment can be brought about by both internal and external conditions. some examples of the characteristics of drug treatment projects which are identified as being important in interpreting performance are the project's treatment philosophy, the treatment modali- ties employed, attributes of clients, staff capabilities, training, and management. There are also a number of external variables which have to be taken into account such as relationships of the project with supporting agencies, funding, community capabilities for drug abuse treatment, and the attitudes of criminal justice agencies about a project. Therefore, if a thorough evaluation is to be made of the project's "impact", the quantitative measures used must consider the project's performance in terms of its crink intrinsic characteristics as well as other conditions outside the project. Keeping this fundamental methodological requirement in mind, the Foundation presents a proposal which is directed towards the following objectives: 1. Evaluate the efficiency of the project's opera- tions. (the quality and other factors that measure the adequacy of project service and the extent to which the objectives are attained) 2. Determine the effectiveness or impact of the pro- Ject on the criminal justice system. (ie. the end results achieved by the project with respect to reducing drug use and property crimes and improved. community protection) , 3. Provide ongoing technical assistance to the project in such areas as training, refinement of the present diagnostic survey, and developing an improved client classification scheme. 4. Research the literature and other similar projects necessary to describe the project's theoretical framework and relationship to other relevant work in the field of drug abuse treatment and prevention. S. Assess the effect of departmental policies and pro- cedures that could influence the project`s operation and effectiveness. 6. Survey and evaluate the project's use of outside resources to identity problems or :actors are involved in coordinating client services outside support agencies and the community. -4- ©0(2,1 j a wo 7_ Identify specific treatment approaches, probation officer characteristics, and specific services that are associated with the treatment outcomes of certain client types. 8- Recommend modifications to the project based on a continual monitoring of the program. 9. Leave the department with a general purpose evaluation model suitable for evaluating other types of special supervision programs. The model would specify the common data elements, data capture techniques, and processing requirements suitable for other evaluation work. APPROACH TO ACHIEVING EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND C014PLETING WORK TASKS In this section, we present a brief discussion of the managerial and technical approach that will be followed in evaluating the ADAPT project. MANAGEMENT APPROACH A meaningful evaluation requires constant feedback during the evalu- ation to both the funding age.-icy and project staff. During the first week of the evaluation, the evaluation team will meet with project staff and personnel from the local criminal justice planning board. The purpose of this first meeting will be: To review the overall workplan, timetable, and interim reporting requirements. To review evaluation objectives, measurement _ criteria, and consider any constraints that would affect the evaluation design_ To review the-approach the evaluation team will follow throughout the course of the project to provide research feedback to the project staff. To outline the types of technical assistance the evaluation team can ,provide the project. A number of reviews are scheduled in the workplan !-*% which the evalu- ation team will report preliminary observations ani findings that may im- prove the project's effectiveness. Other evaluations are taking place or have been publis _d on similar projects. Therefore. we will meet with those individuals or agencies -5- 00215 which have been involved in conducting these evaluations. Specifically, we will seek to determine (1) whether the evaluation criteria established have relevancy to this study, and (2) whether there are any opportunities' for exchange of evaluation ideas, instrumentation, etc. Examples of the kinds of agencies with whom we would contact include Project Intercept; the Western Regional Drug Abuse Training Center in Oakland, California; SONDA, in Sacramento, California; and the National Pretrial Intervention Service Center, Washington, D. C. TECHNICAL APPROACH The technical approach we will follow to meet the objectives of our proposed workplan focuses upon four functional areas: data collection, data sources, instrumentation, and data analysis. We will discuss these aspects of the evaluation in Section III of our detailed workplan. Hwd- ever, we present some summary considerations about each functional area. DATA COLLECTION The focus of the data collection tasks will be on defining precisely the data which has the greatest relevancy to the evaluation effort. We will seek to identify all meaningful data sources which will enable us to make statements concerning the degree to which project activities have achieved or are achieving their objectives . DATA SOURCES Inplicit in this approach is the requirement that all possible data sources be identified. t:e do not know the availability of all the sources we plan to use in the evaluation, but we will stress the following: Individual client records. Project and departmental personnel and other criminal justice agency records. Client interviews. outside agencies and organizations involved in drug abuse prevention and treatment. Some examples are: Nedical treatment centers :ental health Vocatioral education and rehabilitation programs h`elfare ---Local residential and drug^ counseling progrars 1 JM i r INSTRUMENTATION Once data sources are finalized, we will develop the instrumentation for collecting the information outlined in the workplan. This process will involve reviewing all existing documentation procedures and possibly designing some special data collection forms for some of the routine data. Instruments will be specifically designed to help structure (1) client and staff interviews, (2) referral agency interviews, and (3) interviews with local criminal justice agency personnel. All of the instruments will be pretested and reviewed with the project director. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Our analysis of the data collected will allow for cross-correlating client, process, and outcome variables in any combination necessary to determine differential project impacts. Sufficient data should be avail- able, at the conclusion of the evaluation period, to identify and describe the sub-groups of probationers who benefit the most or least from a cer- tain combination of treatment modalities, service level, or outside referral. Staff characteristics, training, and other types of resource inputs that may be associated with certain results will also be examined. Interpretation of the qualitative data will be made in light of the evaluation team's total exposure to the project and the insights obtained , in the course of carrying out the diverse investigation described in the workplan. 00917 • I 1• , - t - - , :'�"::� ,-.' , - , :��,�'*-' �'��, ,-'�'-: -� ',- , . �n' , ��'.""�""�'�-,_�' Q 4 AN y A ,'� ' ' ' ' '�: -_;' �'_':: , �.-�,���;�'"-�� ,,, �'",_ ::' ,�"',,..'f�- , '" "" - I . , I 11 I �:� , " __ ,� - , - " , W 1 4 r4 r'Il l ^' i u . - r q: .L ; # 7 t� :T 4x .,' Y, rhyf -31W �,. 1 4 pT y y s p 1 ^` {t L ! F t Ste`� �i(,•�"yi f t S', Sr L s z r j ?bk , ! t x f G >t t ,� , r + � U 7 .J f x -den '�.:�f r j nj+n 415 ,� _ ?. a �a 1.". Y,n J,yQQQ 1� ! r ; i S' tY t {., �! f ��"� r a :at x hr � k yx '" 7 �'4,_.,, �, q ,� S '1 >r x A a,C STS; 7, f - A s 1 S s stp r`n ;'V, "�-} .td _ ` J„ .y C'r ai L 1 T�F +,�, y i L a f "5 �y{ : sem.1 . e _ _ to, L �,k b h *h f e�2 - ..5 - R��//r� b irp � l �, ry j h ^f i �A`f'i .v r � f f, :P- r ; +4� iws a� 's "y ` d` 'r �a iV.`� a zy .� s'k nw" I "Ims � rs� sf �, 1 ter+,7.iMr, ,,,..5 f a k y fir t` w'L"' ' r r _ _ : 'y,'ix,ifs ' .r` '`,y ',kf"f ss ! 8' 'i a"-�+ i ,?, xk gym" C. �`' 2. 9.'r 4 Y f ,�� rte'�� Y t a 3 r'7.? '4 24 , dr '�" o-1 E}' !r . f .x �` '.x N z) v �, #+ Y f A�fl �- 1 rs` 5 \ 1 r s .- P`' F "" ,yea`r- i I an ' ,, a y 7 11 ... ,,w fi ,,;yJS nr�"f-� 1t f 4' " rt�y- as a >,.. . 7�' 1 t , � ' ! Ys l'i I v *r ¢o- rx` rig >_ At t ,ex: T. i z n r r 4 t f W C`i £'t s' £4 t ;x L x I t br : H �� f J( y{1 y f c T + `e 2 1 oa01a i SECTION III. WOROLM We forsee the total evaluation effort organized around six major tasks. The range of work covered within the several tasks responds fully to both the qualitative and quantitative requirements outlined in the Request for Proposal. TASK 1: INITIAL PLANNING AND ORMITATION TO PROJECT In spite of our experience with the project, we have allocated time to this distinct task in order to familiarize the additional members of the evaluation team with the project and acquaint the project's staff to the scope of Mork and broadened objectives of the second year's evalu- ation. A review of the total workplan will help expose missing task elements and other weaknesses in the study design and is important in establishing a sound foundation for all subsequent activities. Some of the specific areas of the study design that will be covered in the planning and orientation task are: Establish the schedule for retrieving data from project sources. Establish procedures for notifying the evalua- tion team about the termination of cases. Discuss major issues in the evaluation process. A review of the methodology, data elements, and criteria that will be employed in the qualitative evaluation. Discuss the interim reporting requirements and schedules which are necessary to keep the depart- ment, project management, and local OCJP apprised of the contractor's progress. Outline technical assistance phases of the project to determine the specific areas in which the ex- pertise of the evaluation staff can be used to the greatest advantage by project management. Determine the types of cost comparisons which may be valid in comparing client and case costs. Determine the coraosition and selection o: the sample of clients to be interviewed. t ' G i -�- 09219 . TASK 2-.--- BARE NECESSARY MODIFICATIUNZ, AND INSTALL DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR CAPTIJRIldG DQUANTITATIVE ATA ON CLI...NTS aND CLIENT SEl2�TICES In addition to assessing the project's overall results, the evalua- _..-„ uia.. A” as ocal OCJP apprised went, project management, and l of the contractor's progress- outline technical assistance phases of the project to determine the specific areas in which the ex- pertise of the evaluatiofe�anagement be used to the greatest advantage by project Determine the types of cost comparisons which may be valid in conPa=ing client and case costs. Determine the co=_30 r«ion and selection a` the sample of clientz to be interviewed. -�- 00919 . I :. . c:a TASK 2: BAKE NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS AND INSTALL DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR CAPTURING QUANTITATIVE DATA ON CLIENTS AND CLIENT SERVICES In addition to assessing the project's overall results, the evalua- tion should be capable of monitoring activities to such an extent that problems can be corrected before serious degradations of impact occur. In order to provide the project with periodic information about its progress and performance, a number of changes will have to be made in the data collection procedures used in the first year's evaluation. A number of additional or different data elements will probably be used in the second year's evaluation which may change some of the data collection procedures_ It is important to complete this task as quickly as possible before more original cases are terminated and so that standardized data can be collected on all new cases. The three important procedural corrections which have to be made are: Devise some method of securing more reliable data on the control cases with respect to client contacts, referrals, testing activity, and other measures of the service provided. Revise procedures for getting prior criminal history information from the Bureau of Criminal Statistics. The objective here is to obtain "rap" sheets and update rap sheet information continually rather than gather this information at the conclusion of the project. .Determine the nature of the qualitative data that should be recorded by the probation officers in either the project or control group which is not routinely or consistently collected. TASK 3: CONDUCT TIE OUALITATIVE AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT OF THE PROJECT Task 3 encompasses a number of sub-tasks which are necessary in making a comprehensive assessment of the project's qualitative elements. These sub-tasks will include: A literature search Instrument development assessment of project staff Assessment of project services Assessm-ant of clicot's perception of services -9- X 0 20 f Assessment of project management Assessment of outside interaction TASK 3.1: LITERATURE SEARCH We will commence Task 3 by conducting a literature search to identify the theory behind intensive caseload supervision and to locate other pro- grams to which the theory and practice of ADAPT has been applied. We will also look for key factors in the success of such projects and what particular program services offered relate most specifically to drug users. Some of the sources which will be checked are the personal library of Dr. Feinglass and the National Pre-trial Intervention Clearing House. Similar projects in other probation departments will be located and in some cases visited personally by the evaluation team. The main reason for completing the literature search at the early stage of the evaluation is to give the evaluation team the broadest orientation possible to the project and to identify elements of other successful methodologies that may be followed to improve this evaluation. TASK 3.2: I-NSTRUYM-IT DEVELOPMENT A number of instruments will be devised and pretested to structure the interviewing necessary to insure the systematic collection of all the qualitative and process data that will be obtained from staff, management, clients, and outside agencies. These are different instruments than those presently used for recording quantitative information so we have designated instrument development as a specific task. TASK 3.3: ASSESSMENT Or PROJECT STAFF Services and project performance generally reflect the orientation, professional values, initiative, and other personal qualities of the staff members. Such attributes could vary widely between individual members of the project staff. In fact, there is an implicit assumption that the project staff, as a result of their intensified training, closer supervision, etc., will exhibit a pattern of professional charac- teristics that is somewhat different than the control staff. To the extent that these variables may account for significant differences in project results, they must be identified and described. more specifically, the assessment of project and control staff will be directed to obtaining information on: 1. Their conception and definition of case super- vision goals and objectives. i -la 002-21 f 2. Definitions of case "failure" and "success 3. Differences in how their time is allocated among cotmon types of field supervision responsibilities. 4. Their description of client types most amenable to change. S. Their opinions about patterns of supervision and management that is most conducive to effective casework. 6. The latitude that should be afforded staff in case,&,ork decisions. 7. Features of the project's goals, formal organiZAtion, and staffing which interferes with or facilitates success, professional development, and high morale. S. Formal and informal time spent with clients and referral agencies. , This data will be gathered by interviewing all staff using a combi- nation of open-ended and structured interviews. The objective will be to correlate the combination of staff attributes that seem to be significantly associated with positive case outcomes. The analysis of this series of interviews will also be critical input in identifying training needs and other weaknesses of the project that can be corrected. TASK 3.4: ASSESSI-MIT OF PROJECT SERVICES in comparison to control caseloads, project services are supposed to make more deliberate use of outside resources, provide closer surveillance, increase contacts with clients, and utilize a wider range of treatment methods. These are given as ancillary goals of the project, but they are also qualitative variables which can account for measurable differences in the achievement of the project's primary objectives. Services, there- fore, must also be typed and described in such a way so that they can be related with outcomes and the benefits derived by different client types. This task will be acco=plished by a combination of in-depth staff interviews, training seminars, and possibly video taping of some client counseling sessions. The focus of the task will be to determine: is the same type of treatment approach used consistently with clients having similar characteristics. What is the range of treatment modalities used. Are certain modalities not used because of training or lack of familiarity with them. I What factors determine staff decisions regarding frequency of contact, treatment approach used, etc. In what instances is group counseling more appro- priate than individual counseling. Are commonly mentioned modalities such as trans- actional analysis and behavior modification practical and realistic considering caseload sire, training capabilities, and other organi- zational restraints inherent to probation de- partments_ How is the diagnostic survey used in determining the level of client contact needed and is the ' information relevant in making such decisions. TASK 3_S: .ASSESSING CLIENT'S PERCEPTION OF SERVICE The results of high quality effective field supervision should be re- flected in case outcomes, but it should also be reflected in the attitudes of the client. We believe that the client's perception of the services is an important dimension of this study. We propose to determine this by interviewing a valid sample of project and control clients to obtain data on such questions as: Are there specific terms and conditions in pro- ject supervision that are different from those in control. Are the teras clearly understood by the proba- tioner. What are the significant differences which the probationer recognized between project supervision and regular supervision and attitudes concerning differences. Does the probationer feel that intensive super- vision is less punative or more punative than regular supervision. What specific aspects of probation or services are associated with a positive or negative out- look on the part of probationers. " Half the project cases were an regular supervision before being assigned to the project which should furnish some good ^.te nal co=ara- tive situations. 111 will, however, select cases in such. a way as to check for the effects brought about over time. -cone of the data well duplicate � -12- information taken in the diagnostic survey, but this is a deliberate way of,validating one important segment of quantitative data. TASK 3.6: ASSESSAlENT OF PROJECT MA►1AGEMF-NT J 1. -L..L. 14. . and regular supervision and attitudes concerning differences. Does the probationer feel that intensive super- vision is less punative or more punative than regular supervision. Shat specific aspects of probation or services are associated with a positive or negative out- look on the part of probationers. Half the project cases Fere on regular supervision before being assigned to the project which should furnish some good i.ternal cozLpara- tive situations. Ile will, however, select cases in sac: a way as to check for the effects brought about over time. game of the data. duplicate -12- 0223 " information taken in the diagnostic survey, but this is a deliberate way of.validating one important segment of quantitative data. TASK 3.6: ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT This project exists as a sub-unit of the larger organization. Con- sequently, the project is subjected to influences that are external to itself, ie. department policies with respect to staff promotion, discipline and transfer. The project will also exhibit characteristics that are peculiar to its own management, physical location, having more special resources, and special training of its members. Some of these factors may be important in explaining the overall results acheived. In terms of knowledge transfer and replication elsewhere, the evaluation should identify special problems encountered in establishing the project, training its members, and carrying on its essential activities within a demonstration environment. Specifically, the focus of the inquiry under this sub-task will be on: How is the time of the project director dis- tributed over typical managerial responsibilities such as supervision, auditing field activities, reporting, grant administrative duties, training, and outside public relations. What aspects of a demonstration project interfere the most with exercising proper supervision and control over staff. Are there procedures for effective resolutions of problems. What special abilities or training is needed to develop a successful grant administrator. What are the main problems encountered in finding adequate training sources for staff. Does the prominence or spotlighting of the pro- ject contribute to high morale and good employee- supervisory relationships. { What qualities of staff does management recognize as being most important in selecting staff for an experimental project. What infoa--al indicators are used by the project administrator to "signal" good or bad staff performarre. How is internal co=-unication handled. -13- 00224 i Do staff perceive their roles differently in a project situation. TASK 3.7: ASSESSMENT OF OUTSIDE AGENCY INTERACTION Helping the probationer obtain the benefit of all the community's social resources is an important function in the basic supervision con- cept of ADAPT. This evaluation task focuses on determining the extent to which outside agencies are used, the kind that are used, and the factors that are associated with their being used successfully. The quantitative side of these questions are being routinely collected now. The qualitative aspects will have to be obtained by tracing a group of referrals back through the support agencies. Data collection for this task Will also be accomplished through direct field contact with the sup- port agencies combined with information from staff and clients. The objective of the task will be to learn: What type of referrals are most suitable for particular programs. Is there any interaction between control and project probationers. How do project staff interact and follow through with the agency after a referral is made. What formalized or informal exchanges take ` place between the project and the referral agency in keeping each other informed about a case. How familiar are the staff with the outside agency's admission policies. Does the staff have the admission policies and ot'lor .retial information in written form. Is there mutual understanding about the operations ' and limits of each other's programs. i What criteria are used in determining which re- ferral agencies to use. Are there more appropriate agencies than those being used. -14- 0 c2 TASK 4: CONDUCT THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS Broadly described, the work in Task 4 is directed -to determining the degree to which the project has affected quantifiable improvement in: Community safety Resource utilization Social effectiveness of probationer Correctional effectiveness of project Cost effectiveness of services The level of client services Staff development The major part of the work in this task will involve collecting and analyzing six different types of client and process data on the 480 pro- bationers who comprise the project and control caseloads. The type of quantitative information that will be employed in the evaluation can be grouped into categories which relate to: (1) client attributes, (2) base- line data on prior criminal activity of each probationer, (3) level of ? ' service and treatment modalities used in casework, (4) type and number of outside resources utilized, (5) criminal activity occurring after referral to the project, and (6) cost and fiscal information. SOURCE OF DATA The source of client attribute data will be the diagnostic survey and the biographical information in the court intake report. Baseline data will be taken from CII rap sheets and will consist of the number and severity of offenses and the felony and misdemeanor convictions occurring one year before referral to the project. The level of service, treatment modality used, and outside re- ferrals made are collected on the form shown in Step 4.3 of this task. ' Recidivism data will come from CII rap sheets; absconds, technical vio- lations, and other types of post treatment incidents from case records. The department designed this project as a controlled experiment comparing differences between the two treatment groups. Assessment of the project, therefore, must be based on comparisons of client outcome, staff performance. etc. Our approach to evaluating such a design will inclu3e four tasks. i -15- 0,�n2'J v- TASK 4.1: IDENTIFY RELEVANT EVALUATION CRITERIA The criteria we will use in assessing the project's impact on community safety, resource utilization, etc. are shown on Page 17. Others may be disclosed in the course of the initial planning and orientation task. TASK 4.2: VERIFY WIPARABILITY OF THE PROJECT AND CONTROL GROUPS Essential characteristics of about half the cases in the two groups were analyzed in the first year's evaluation. The balance of the cases added since January will be reviewed as quickly as possible to insure comparability of the total study population. This will be done by col- lecting and analyzing data on the personal characteristics and offense patterns of assigned cases. Pre-program baseline offense data will also be derived from this step. TASK 4.3: ANALYZE DIFFERENCES IN THE SERVICES 'PROVIDED BY THE PROJECT Measurable data about the level of service and the characteristics of services provided will be recorded on the case activity record below. INSTRUCTIONS Record Every Contact or Diction Separately CASE ACTIVITY RECW REATnENT APPROACH 1. Surveillance S. Reality Therapy 2. Counseling 6. T.A. 3. Group Counseling 7. Rets. Plod. 4. racily Therapy S. Activity Group CI.I£QT NAM' CII i t VMS elra i rrm Kai=or COKracr aoax-zap or CasraCr i s � r +� Ll Cliewt E/ Warr %! heatamt Kaie ' j-7 Ct. Related / /F lass 10 ran / / 46 arts-I hr (Sce Code) Da I t Oellateral j-,-Wore %t volice Related J/ 1I-20=in I - 1-1/2 tss _ i-1 Cheat P�.rrst Yr i7 outside Fasas;:rcre I I Feld t /Testanq ! / 21-4s =in Over 2 hrs r tspeeafyt ! � f/ raa,:p 1eer3er �� rrcd !/ a:agnnstic rv. , Office! %/ 1 . !�+ a1.:r Related � i t 149n3ficant Chany.-or 1%nats of Pt,-res:; i C!tlt1E!T I j AWLT DOM AUfE Am) TRLATttEtiT PROJECT OWECTIVE PLASUPE:1F.tiT CWTERIA TtiAT VW_ BE 13SEi1 It: UVX UATlOU THE A_11`J'T PROJECT rA1'.1.T t'!t FiTlt<< CII i i HATS -lettT"Mift i i ror cowracr arax-zoo or casracT M !/Clic t '�/ W. /%7reatamt rf.ie � i -- %/!Ct. Related !/ lass 20 min / / 46 aain-1 hr I t collateral j t/ Home Mee Code) _ %// police Rclated %/ 11-20 sin 1 - 2-1/2 has s+ ;arse J SY ,�/Q:isidr Frsav:rcre!%// Feld � i )aril- mer �L/Testing %/ 21-45 inset Over 2 hrs i J s i'ral. �/Diagnostic rv. Office. / I l.aplorrs M.lated i •j9rrrSt:anL Cluny.-er lbarta of Pro-zeas: v EXHIM I AM&T 9= Amx Pi.EYEL )Oil IM TREAMEtiT PROJECT (bJECTIVE MASOr^.F2l UT CRITERIA TILAT WILL EE USED It: LVAUATlall THE &IMPT NOJECT m,cr..m t rrm-,s rt*rtvAr!.v CS.'r !A --Ciffer.-Swe t.•t..vs+ yrohtt :wd control is rbc M-Wr oral frequency of Property.tad drug eonvictsoms at a sosths, 1 Year, and 1.5 year in:crvals during tr.rausect period --flaogcs is ttk severity of offense, cuerietions, and technical violations d..rirg tacs:xt period • Impvne CM==itr Safety --24iference in the number of pasitirc arinalysis during project period -- '�4es in t!-e scrioasaess or drugs used —CmWarative diftereares in the mrl�cr and type tic. ho=e, field, p!,cra, co22aurall of-%Mtb-vY contacts With probationers --Differences sn the total hours eeruted to caseloads during project period --Corparstive differences fa the t="r and type tie. hose, field, phone, i collateral) of monthly contacts with probationers i --aiffereaces its the total boar+ do. :ad to easeleads daring project period it • Iatwov a the Z&vcl of Client Services --Oifferezres i16 the total hours Of direct client contact —Differences in the fra:gwncy of ebenicsl testing (urinalysis) --Differences is the tre uwmt Modes followed in project and control caseloads --Oifferrnces in the number of proration-s referred to outside support agencies c vieva"ce utilization —Differences in the type of Mtsi3k agencies used »P--Abatiaa offuss ratings of each client's progress during treatment period • Irprove Social Effectiveness of probationers C-a=Ws in for social, economic, or fsuily cbaracteristics of the clients that were s;acifically brotgbt about by the project —D_fferences :r. property end drW tcnv:etions sin; probationers who have completed tram eervice proZran • Ir��rova Qorraciicaal Effectivvaess of Oepast=eat --Craages is the severity,of offense convictions among probationers wto havu ecnpIetRd servirr --raffetenres is the prior agerienee of project and control staff biffctences is tate number and type of coarse taken by project and control staff --lbtml van dsfs of training offered staff •Staff De%Vlow eat --Oifferener it the&momz of training expenditures between the project, the depart -xt as a wbole, and sirdar departreats with other apoeializVd sapervision a-.its —Staff cams!'_ r-.ting of spreia!i:.ed trai•.inZ --Saof ratra- a: t!.e tee'sieal ec:.Le,:, 4vality, of inestrcetic», a'Id ezganization of Lb.- eawr.a. ra d • Lost Z.!f ct'r_-+:�:. Of -- ::!.isrr+ �a :tr -client coy _ 7�v_ 'a+•t'+c•�n zogulsr r ,ccv:s:... a'- .esvaLva Mi_ct.r oxut tr'att.ant a. t'-, -17- With this data, we will be able to analyze the duration of con- tacts, how client contacts originate, and the extent to which different treatment modes are utilized. The procedure is to complete one of these forms in every instance a client is contacted. TASK 4.4: COMARE POST-TREATMENT CHANGES IN THE TWO GROUPS DURING AND AFTER TMUNATION FROM THE PROJECT This will be done by tracking the two groups for subsequent criminal justice involvement. The criteria used will be arrest incidents, proba- tion violations, convictions, and severity of offenses. Successful com- pletion of probation as well as job improvement and educational advance- ment are also being recorded and will be considered as positive aspects of treatment outcomes. Each case will be reviewed at some point near the end of the evalu- ation year with the probation officer for a scaled assessment of other personal, social, or family improvements in the case. Criminal justice involvement of the probationer who terminates from the program will be analyzed for the long-term effect of the project on reducing recidivism. TASIC 5: ANALYSIS OF DATA Instrumentation, software, and the procedures for, analyzing the quantitative information collected were perfected during the first year's evaluation. The analytical framework will allow for cross- correlating client, process, or outcome variables in any combination necessary to determine differential project impacts with respect to client groups, different treatment modalities, different service levels, etc. Sufficient data should be available at the conclusion of the pro- ject's year to identify and describe the sub-groups of probationers who benefit the most or least from a certain combination of treatment modalities, service level, or pattern of referrals. Staff characteristics, training, and other types of resource inputs that may be associated with certain results will also be examined. Interpretation of the quantitative data will be made in light of the evaluation team's total exposure to the project and the insights obtained in the course of carrying out the diverse investigation described in the workplan. In short, the end product of the evaluation should: 1. Determine the validity of the project's treatment h}-pothesis. 2. E:Tlain what factors contribute the most to the success or failure of the project. -18- 00229 3. .Extend findings to suggest a more complete picture of the project's total impact rather . than merely its effect on recidivism. 4. Suggest to OCJP, the Regional Council, and the department the cost and effectiveness of the project in comparison to the control group and other types of community programs in conta Costa and its potential for replication elsewhere. TASK 6: PREPARE AND SUBMIT A FINAL REPORT The results of each of the previous work tasks will be formally documented in a final report. while the specific contents of'the report are discussed in the proceeding tasks, we anticipate that the overall organization of the report will include: Summary Findings and Conclusions--A summary assess- ment of the project's implementation, operational effectiveness in carrying out its service goals and recommendations for improvement. Introduction--Description of the larger theoretical basis for intensive caseload supervision, key factors in the success of such projects, and a description of the scope and purpose of the evalu- ation. Evaluation Methodology--A description of the approach taken in evaluating the ADAPT project including instruments, data collection procedures, data analysis, and other procedures followed in evaluating the program. Project Description---A detailed description of the ADAPT project including: --Discussion of project development emphasizing policy changes and procedures since the incep- tion of the program as well as the organiza- tional and com=mity setting. --The type of approach, rationale, and underlying assumptions of service concept. The program's primary and secondary objectives. A description of management and staff. The project's referral criteria and numlzer of probationers handled in the first and second year of the program. _19 i Total budget expenditures for both first and second year of the program. Evaluation Results—A detailed assessment (based on both a qualitative and quantitative analysis) of the project's effectiveness, differential impact on client types, management style, ser- vices delivered, and reco—lendations for project improvement. A comparison of the costs associated with servicing clients in regular and intensive supervision caseloads. We will submit a draft of our final report to the project supervisor, department administration, and the Regional Council for review and approval. Thirty printed copies of the final report will be delivered two weeks after approval of the draft for distribution by the department. I . j -20- a02�31 i - i ",��� ',� ,,:, ,, .� , , � - '. , �,�__,,� _': � , i,,"". . _ , , ,,�":,�,:�,,_:- .1��, 1, ,I , �"': ,, �...;, __,;�-�,;,,�7,�,�,-.�:, " "i , , ,"", "" , , z �-�_ ` �"'� , , � . , � , " ., 7' ' , .,�!�.� I I. '.,,:",::,���,,',, ,, � ,, � I I , , , 'I�" � , ,-�� , , _;� - `,:,� ": "' '��' ' , , _]___��._ !�'2 1:r���,,�, I I , .,�;,. - � , "�: ,I I .I ,, �, �,, - , , " �' � ��"�' " "'"� "' � ' ' :�' "' I ,, " ,, z, ,,", ,-_,-,,. �, 4�"-,,��", ,, , ,� -��,,��,,�, " . rt �v g "x a t j w ,� a y�.tea' �f 3 ° a '"" '>x 5r�>'ti y x E § iso ,". s ,.:, - '"ts w cg's x .`r ,pc. �' k t : l gyp:i s as r 4 4r d�� ,}rr�Y a cx�,-,E �'t' r t d 1 r f w rpox `�'� s' �� +' ,"z � 'Sy" a k2`'' e s `� 4 ' t � '�1 -iti't r' . # t � . ` ,', C d, - : 2 r> '"'� k }s Ki .2 a w`z a�., x+� y� y�y�rr. " 5 3 � I �, t4., �.. " -i,- nm c x: x aeis v sr l>rr was*:.x*. y x s'-.+*� '7�"r�i.�¢� ,..n AQ % Novi sk ,� y � ,, aux fi ,r'�t �- , sS y%s '1,t*��ra9»x.� 3 wou i [ s�.a� mei s* �v � rs. 2 �, ��- w,gym "7`fir-III ' �: r i .J rX a't 7 as�d a4t Y J�`t n-s��'+' Anumq Wo nyway 1 t Z'4'N"riV 3 f # �' '' M',t3' ,R, 1 hWM r .y, �x r,�" :7a ,g't f�y -ffz' rr.x y, s z}a. "r .,n r c �4.unr ",�, C. n +�5 ai ds �+4 ..z c ` z �x r .#' 't` n � ar * s c� r� " 'Er€��s s Y C .r 5r i^ '`xx! r°x 3 S x „ §"s„r �.,. 'f''E'� "AW-10-SW F fi vw �, *v " l.:d'7 j_jt y+-' s-?x 3., p$"�"y°"t ! fix" WANS 'kt'�,� § s t11, 3 +. Pwrk vf� r -Sr"t� r J 9rY-xa' ��� r� ' w .� r z a tet.- "'' ' s+.:¢- " Si ;r ',,v^ +� tea s''> ; :. k� 11 `#s r ` �.„ '' ,r r z..>d*x i x��%i ry x`0- - t✓r�' ,a4 s y s .�xC t r MIR i,Z z 5 x S?# n a 9' "'a a r- {�' +,.c} y�y mac° ,. 3 '4y' mulz.v "' L" g' y r f � gra {,tx c a s ' �i + F r x-r�1' r'*a t'Ft k NP Y a m" , . F coviougs Iu t d ^k t 45 Yf d � 11 . ,5 t �' �'c''rz !., e +�* M1a -nvr�S a . . k ;ext ds+r`i h'`a �311 x �n,,, .,', . ;t,,"' d, y plymonz y fn 11 I 4w °.i t x � ds,""izz�,, "['i� t-"6}"y"V�'rk 7 .s-..�u,rb" .... 1 w� . $ �� $ } Ay\ATC � ��,l �V`M.<, '1 4"J e._?�11�51.9 7``_10 Txf 'd-1a+ !t d,}�; EK'+ rg, .1111-11. J 11 il �,MF ,.,/ t 3 1y ,'E-A'. S4•y',q.�Nr�1fi4 r r I aWX r'x if t .,' y?x`- 51,x, �` E 'k x* Sx 1.11, t s 'fi d _> a"�''` ' i - . : :�_.1' w ,y .,kr a4�i^"�;*jk . MSF'I.J °�rq�f�r`'y, "�c+ 11 y'Sn" . Y "-2 t r 5 ��7 aq,f42�k ..crypt'�iS, tt4'J" }.t�Sif' W 11� ;F x _ `r rg "`-Y i k .�' k yw.ip?:`y,�#r w, .y r i � ;xtl 1 �:„ r } fit,N'ly, 'kx x- P k' Ie t k"t"F''ti I _ Z tF f f k 1 M' 1 syfy` 3 r- s a _""` 'S f 1; ,4_r35„ C Y� s'11 nr o->✓F i `h.M 5b ik , ' .r y t ex �'& '•� "} '$ deft x. IT- mmm mg ; 01, �F .F ,F r..rf y. 'L,x z .,` ;�'i-.r% i v t 8 ¢ t� "'. n' -�' ,r h r, rful c: r fi s i�3 C5<"ur ' ,§+"nr"%5i '_'°`s�,�y C.7 ,x " � � d J u y . t n1 I 'i'-.e+v z , `t' L -t- J�Q,a+ rs .J^ {xry�n 43 .< y,iii v� F 4 ,' rr�" C� �,a:'�` 0. +y . y, .i « *7; x ?y _ e tr 's t Ghat. y i tont : T'kY ,a.r r'.} wA Rr t sa I c;�i I,,, CJs'e: ! t o s 4 F § a Y S �.�Cr' S F. V't`�s'b�T3 14+ x t 5 '� n"r �' ,11 -,'WAST� .M T,.f�:,E rH " J,Pr x�t "s,;W-AN„fie; r. �, 11 ,. ,� Jam, .fx,,• ',: a y. r - , `t t r. �-xti `` .d #� R'? fix sfi � Y N i s S r.,,ce -" ss�,& r a a uay^s ter. zr.X a,�.�",tT" . 4 r t x " 'Z -� t .t F3trr',fi?r xw`is�.ty%` I {"u1. X : - f� F k, 1 ,hi k' ' i ,� t�+r" , t( k {i Y 4 re :q �fUS IF r ma w"l e § ;°a, a r ^` .i tl ; p1-1 ]{ u k >` ,i w uY 11 Al I 1- 1.I �� ��,, —,1: , - � ,�t. ,� _4}" ,__ � ,W, I 1-1'1-_,**_ , ,,-w-, a '' K IF I SECTION IV. WORK SCHEDULES PM COSTS Bchibit 2 presents a time phased workplan for accomplishing the six tasks described in Section III. Delivery dates for both the draft and published report described in the workplan are shown in this sec- tion as well as meetings with the Project Supervisor, OCCJ Representa- tive, and department administration. In addition, the estimated man days of consulting effort by task are also indicated. This schedule assumes a January 1, 1975 project start date. Exhibit 3 presents a breakdown of the man days each member of the evaluation team will de- vote to the project by task. As the exhibit indicates, we estimate the entire evaluation effort will cover an eight month period. The evaluation team of the Foundation will devote a total of 219 man days of consulting. PROJECT COSTS we have developed our cost estimates for the evaluation based upon the workplan described in Section III of our proposal and our belief that a maximum staff effort should be devoted toward the evaluation. Exhibit 4 summarizes the costs and the reimbursable expenses associated with the Workplan. The entire consulting costs for the evaluation project will be $20,998. This estimate includes: Total direct labor including hourly rate for each of the evaluation team and clerical staff. An overhead rate of 20s based on the Foundation's ' financial expenses in fiscal 1974-75. Other labor expenses for special consultants and research assistants who will be hired to code the quantitative data in the evaluation. Reimbursable expenses for transportation, sub- sistence, communication, and report reproduction. i i -21- 0 0 s O s t Yom.+ 40— P O It r y v .t T r a S NT N u. w Q � O- x a o � a a '3 � s. � tea. � ✓ G O " n N i I t � EXHIBIT 3 "AgpoM LMjjjc BY Task e � a Tam QVSMPTUM 1. uitia. Planning aux: ==: iaE�an 2 2 12 p 2 t8 to Project 2, "AlLe Wecassary n.-iificstians and install Data Wlectioa PSOCednrts for Capturing Caantitative Oats 3 1 2 0 0 6 an clients and Client Sertices 3. Conduct tUt 9""tat:ya AMC szuccss 5 0 60 0 5 70 assessment of the Project t. Conduct t1w Qwntitativ* assess—at 30 is 0 0 0 AS of Project lffcetive--" 2 S. analysis of Data 6. prepare and Submit a Final Report 16 t6 t0 18 60 0 M925B =S25 219 TA?A1.ltA�t Ot1[S 003 i f EXHIBIT 4 ADULT DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT PROJECT PROJECT BUDGET -I. Direct Labor Daily Rate Han Days Estimated Costs, A.' Bean $90 58 $ 5,220 F. Campbell $80 39 3,120 Secretary $30 25 750 Slab-Total $ 9,P90 II. Orerhead Rate @ 20$: 1,818 Sub-Total $10,908 III. Other Direct Labor: Dr. Feinglass $100 62 6,200 F. Berkowitz $90 30 2,700 Research Assistant $40 5 200 t Slab lbtal $20,008 IV. Reinbursable Expenses: _ Transportation (3,000 miles @ 150/mile) $450 Subsistence 100 Comrmanication 100 Data Processing 240 Report Reproduction 100 i 990 TOTAL PROM= COST $20,998 t t f 1 t i -24- 00 s fl J d 1 l 1 } 3 MMM mm� ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING OF EVALUATION TEAK! f Y S S S � f � C f R 1 f ! r f 01437 E E f ' i SECTION V. I ORGANIZATION AND STAFF UNG OF EVALUAT I OSI TEAMI The foundation has assembled a team of professionals with both the experience and the qualifications needed to evaluate and provide the ongoing technical assistance necessary to direct this project to a successful completion. A high level of expertise is provided in each area of research methodology, data accumulation and analysis, survey design, and drug abuse training. Each member of the team has been purposely selected for their specialized ability in some phase of the research plan. Each team member will have a working and analytical role ,in the evaluation rather than management responsibilities. Collectively, the evaluation staff has a range of skills which include: Working knowledge of the goals and operations of the specialized intensive supervision project. Broad experience in working with demonstration projects in probation departments including staff training. Skills and experience in program evaluation and techniques including client and agency surveys and statistical analysis. A reputation for objectivity in the consulting profession. Mr. Bean will serve as the project director in the evaluation. He will assume final responsibility for coordinating all phases of the work described in the workplan and will be the principal point of contact with the department. He will have a working and analytical relationship on key tasks with Dr. Feinglass and lis. Berkowitz in developing methodology and implementing each stage of the research plan. He will have direct respon- sibility for the tasks related to the tracking of project and control cases and the collection of other objective data collected outside the project needed by Dr. Feinglass for monitoring or modifying the qualita- tive and process aspects of the program. Mr. Bean has had 14 years experience in governmental research and has directed or been associated with over 45 research projects at the county and state level. His evaluation e_•Terience in criminal justice is extensive and involves the evaluation of three similar i:ntcnsive super- vision projects. Other related work has included research on the cost i effectiveresss of such programs as wor:. furlough and early parole release. Dr. Feinglass will have responsibility for perfe-my those parts of t:e related to the a=25S=nt of outs-"c "csoYrccz -25- 0 f)`23-S I { ..t a< and for evaluating the service, training, and treatment components of the experiment. He shall provide ongoing technical assistance to the project supervisor and make recommendations on training and modifications of the service program. Since Dr. Feinglass has been directly involved in drug programs covering the entire spectrum of medical, psychological, and social aspects of drug treatment, he shall assist in describing the theoretical frame- work of the project and appraising the appropriateness of the treatment provided the clientele. He will assist in identifying referrals most suited to specific treatment modalities and referral agencies considering the staff and other capabilities of each referral agency. He shall also assist in final report preparation and in interpreting qualitative and quantitative findings. Mr. Cambell will be responsible for the collection, coding, and statistical processing of all statistical data collected from the project records, community survey questionnaires, and the Bureau of Criminal Statistics. He shall supervise any data collectors used and summarize data as needed to monitor the progress of the project and to make interim reports to the project supervisor, OCJP, and the department. Mr. Campbell, from previous experience, has a working relationship with all the police departments and community agencies within the county which will facilitate access to necessary sources of information. Ms. Berkowitz has been included in -the team as a special consultant to assist in the methodological design and development of specific sur- vey instruments and to consult with the team on other matters related to interpretation and analyzing data. As former chief of research for OCJP, - she has approved grants and monitored many similar drug treatment pro- grams funded by OCJP. Her familiarity with similar programs and research designs will enable her to bring relevant parts of other methodologies to bear on the evaluation efforts. Before leaving OCJP, Ms. Berkowitz coordinated the evaluation of several large clusters of programs including drug education and prevention projects. Her professional interests in- clude criminology, free response analysis, and treatment of devient behavior within neighborhood settings. At least two coders will be needed to prepare field data for computer processing at various intervals in order to monitor service activity, recidivism, and other comparative measures of results. The Stanford Computer Center in Palo Alto will be used for processing the data for these periodic reports and for the final analysis of results. -26- OV0139 EXHIBIT 5 ADULT DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT PROJECT Project Supervisor PROPOSED PROJECT QRGAUIZATION AND STAFFING Contra costa County Probation Departaent Contra Costa County Criminal Justice Planning Board Criminal Justice Research Foundation t Project Director A. Bean Project Research special Special Consultant consultant Consultant F. camapbell Assistants F. Berkowitz Dr. Feinglass NNWi s ARLD K. BUN Mr. Bean has a Bachelor of Arts degree in public administration from Idaho State College and completed course work for a degree in public administration .from Wayne University as a Lent D. Upson Fellow. Mr. Bean has had 14 years experience in directing large scale surveys and management studies. He has been associated with over 45 research pro- jects at the county and state level. He has had direct experience in county government as an assistant county administrator -and has served on a number of task forces at the state level concerned with such issues as educational finance, property tax reform, probation subsidy, and agricul- tural land conservation. Mr. Bean received his initial training in public policy research in two non-profit private research organizations in Michigan which did salary and classification plans and reorganization studies for local government. Prior to creating the Criminal Justice Research Foundation in 1973, Mr. Bean directed contract consulting services for the California Taxpayers, Association. The subject areas were generally concerned with management, organizational improvement, fiscal operations of county hospitals, school districts, mental health programs, corrections training, community action agencies, courts, and probation. Evaluation of criminal justice programs represents the major program area in which he has worked since founding the Criminal Justice Research Foundation in 1973. Some of the representative studies in criminal justice he has directed are an evaluation of the Modesto Correctional Academy which provides basic training to all state correctional officers and youth. counselors. An evaluation of two subsidy programs for the San Mateo Pro- bation Department; one program is concerned with reducing foster home placement for juveniles, and the other with evaluating the effectiveness of an intensive supervision program for 150 adults. He has also directed an evaluation of the effectiveness of a county-wide drug enforcement program in San Mateo County. The evaluation methodology of these programs has involved the design of computerized tracking systems, attitudinal and com- munity questionnaires, and survey analysis. Other related Mork has included research on the cost effectiveness of such programs as work furlough and early parole release. Mr. Bean has also participated in studies involving the development of an integrated cost aceountina system for criminal justice agencies for the California Legislature and has conducted several studies concerned with development of uniform workload standards for sheriffs' departments, assessors, and county clerks operations. Between 1962 and 1964 Mr. Bean had a long-term consulting affiliation with the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards designing and validating a battery of 2000 test items presently used for licensing private investigators and patrol agencies throughout California. Professional affiliation includes the Western Governmental Research Association, California Association of Criminal Justice Research, and the Amc—xic:an Society of Public: ;Zmir:istraLic,n. He has served as an ad- -28- 241 vi.sory member to the State Controller on the Uniform Accounting Act and is a guest lecturer at Sacramento State University on public policy research and at Modesto Criminal Justice Training Center on evaluation and research design. other related work has included research on the cost effectiveness of such programs as work furlough and early parole release. Mr. Bean has also participated in studies involving the development of an integrated cost accounting system for criminal justice agencies for the California Legislature and has conducted several studies concerned with development of uniform workload standards for sheriffs' departments, assessors, and county clerks operations. Between 1962 and 1964 Mr. Bean had a long-term consulting affiliation with the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards designing and validating a battery of 2000 test items presently used for licensing private investigators and patrol agencies throughout t California. Professional affiliation includes the Western Govern ental Research Association, California association of Criminal Justice Research, and the American Society of Public: A ministrativu. He has served as an ad- visory member to the State Controller on the Uniform Accounting Act and is a guest lecturer at Sacramento State University on public policy research and at Modesto Criminal Justice Training Center on evaluation and research design. 7r , -29- 00942 . .p FRED R. CA,IPBELL Z!r• Camp e11 has a Bachelor of Arts and a Masters degree in 9o�ment from the California State University at Sacr also Participated in a number of special educational amento. Fie has the IBM technology and governmental application throughsemsnars on computer. Jose. California. School in San Prior to joining the Criminal Justice Research Foundation Mr. �� 'ith the California State Legislature as a research Campbell work involved cost hk-ns-f:* - -1. ; - analyst. R►f,a 1 , -29- }� �+ t FRED R. CAIMPBELL Mr. Campbell has a Bachelor of Arts and a Master's degree in government from the California State University at Sacramento. He has also participated in a number of special educational seminars on computer technology and governmental application through the ZBM School in San Jose. California. Prior to joining the Criminal Justice Research Foundation, Mr. Campbell worked with the California State Legislature as a research analyst. The work involved cost benefit analysis of educational policy changes and how they affected particular Assembly districts. Other activities included speech writing, development and analysis of periodic district-wide question- naires that were used to determine constituent understanding of pending legislation in such areas as court reform, educational financa, and consu- mer protection. For three years, he was employed by the California Taxpayers' Associ- ation as a State affairs Analyst. This work involved indepth research addressed to specific major problems of state and local government juris- diction including educational finance, program budgeting, welfare, and law enforcement. Just prior to leaving the organization, Mr. Campbell served as coproject director for a cluster evaluation of five delinquency diversion projects prepared for the Office of Criminal Justice Planning. The study was the second largest evaluation contract among the seven that were awarded as part of OCJP's comprehensive assessment of its planning and funding decisions in 1973-74. The evaluation provided OCJP with previously unavailable information on project impact and related efforts - to specific project approaches. The study also culminated in the develop- ment of an evaluation model for juvenile diversion projects that was sub- sequently implemented by the California Youth Authority in a larger state- wide evaluation of similar programs. Since joining the Foundation, Mr. Campbell has concentrated on pro- gram evaluation, training, workload studies, and crime analysis and statis- tics. He recently completed a survey of training programs among criminal justice agencies in a 26 county region for the Northern California Criminal Justice Training and Education System. He also has developed a state-wide system for reporting management and administrative information for proba- tion departments, juvenile hall, and camp programs for the Bureau of Criminal Statistics. Other research studies include a user's assessment of statis- tica , output from the five components of the California Department of Jus- tice's Comprehensive Data System. The study kis commissioned to provide a better understanding of user information needs and his uses of the data than the department had up to that time. Mr. Campbell is currently participating in a qualitative evaluation of the Sacramento County Probation Department's Adult intensive Supervision Unit. '"ne evaluation is part of the California Youth Authority's evalu- ation of county subsidy programs. The research is one of six studies authorized by the California Legislature under Assembly Bill 180 to help decide the future of the $20 million correctional program. ! -30- QO?-4.3 Mr. Campbell has lectured at the Modesto Regional Criminal Justice Training Center in a special semina dealing with loAg-range planning and research for law enforcement agencies. The special seminar dreg law enforcement planning personnel from five states outside California. The topic of his presentation focused on the dimensions of public policy finance including such issues as tax rate limits and revenue sharing and theix relationship to future law enforcement long-range planning and research. i j t 0') 044 31- -r FRA: C I WJE J. BERKOU ITZ Hs. Berkowitz received a Bachelor of Arts degree in sociology from Queens College of the City University of New York and a Haster's degree is,rri in-1 j»tet-ire. frr 11-1,u .T�% I .TSV Mll of r-i- in-1 .Tr -4-ie 002 ' -31- FRKIKINE I BEFJCOUITZ Ms- Berkowitz received a Bachelor of Arts degree in sociology from Queens College of the City University of New York and a Master's degree s in criminal justice from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. As a special consultant with the Criminal Justice Research Founda- tion, Ns. Berkowitz is currently conducting a program evaluation of social service programs administered at the state and local level. Ms. Berkowitz has six years of experience in criminal justice planning, evalu- ation, and research. Until recently, she was chief of research for the State of California's Office of Criminal Justice Planning. Ms. Berkowitz's accomplishments in program and project evaluations are well ]mown in the criminal justice community. As manager of the evaluation of clusters of projects in seven different program areas, she was first in the United States to produce criminal justice evaluation products at the program level. She published the first methodological review of evaluation of projects within California's criminal justice system. A candidate for appointment to California's Board of Corrections, Ms. Berkowitz has also worked as a correctional caseworker and is familiar with criminal justice operations at the local level. Ms. Berkowitz's publications include: Evaluation of Criminal Justice Programs in California A Review (1973), The Community Assessment Approach to Criminal Justice Planning: An Alternative Madel She is currently co-planning and authoring a textbook on criminal justice. 1 -32- f SANFORD J. FEINGL SS EDUCATION-- B.S., Brooklyn College of Pharmacy U.S., University of California, San Francisco, California Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco, California Dissertation: "The Synthesis and Bioassay of Analogues of the Thyroid Hormones." POST-DOCTORAL TRAINING: 2-1/2 yrs. Pharmacology Dept., University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, California PF�FSENT POSITIONS: Executive Director, Institute for Social Concerns, Oakland, California. ISC is a non-profit corpora- tion operating drug abuse training programs funded by various federal agencies, most notably the National Institute of Mental Health. Consultant, Special Action Office for Drug Abuse Prevention. Consultant, National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse. FORMER POSITIONS: Program Director, Drug Abuse Training Center, California State College at Hayward, National Institute of mental Health. Visiting Professor, Pacific of Religion. PUBLICATIONS: "Drug Abuse Education in Marin County," California School Health 4, 21 (1968) . "Marijuana: A Study of the Issues," J. Sec. Ed. 43, 196 (1968). "Marijuana: Standardization, Characterization and Potential Therapeutic Uses,: J. Sec. Ed. 43, , 206 (1968). "Teachers' Guide to the Nervous System," Copyright 1968. "Questions and Answers About Drug Abuse," Marin County Superintendent of Schools Office, 1968. (Ed.) "Teachers Resource Materials on Drug Abuse," Marin County Superintendent of Schools Office, 1968. -33- 002-45 (with H. Sallady and J. Green) "Health Education Curriculum, X-8," Dixie School District Office, 1968. (with R. Harker and J. Larkin) "Drug Abuse," Novato Unified School District, 1968. (with D. P. Ringler) "Drug Abuse Education," Burlingame Union High School District, 1968. "Drug Abuse Education," CAM Research Resumes, 20th Wide Conference Issue. "Drug Abuse Education," CTA Journal, Jan. 1969 and Revision Feb. 1969. (with R. H. Blum, et.al) "Drugs II: Students and Drugs," (Vol. 2 of Drugs) Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, 1969. (Ed.) Drug Education Resource Materials, U. S. Public Health Service Publication #1964, 1970. "Bow to Plan a Drug Abuse Education Workshop for Teachers," National Institute of Mental Health, Public Health Service Publication No. 1162, Nov. 1969. . "Community Education and Action," Southwestern Law Journal, in press. "Drugs the Children are Choosing," NET. 1968. "Drug Abuse Education," Nebraska Educational Television Council on Higher Education, 1969. "Drug Abuse," RVIE Television production, 1970. "On Teaching About Drugs," Methods and Media, Sept. 1970 and Jan. 1971. "A Day in the Life of 6 Dealers" in press. (With R. H. Blum, et.al) "Dealing Practices in the San Francisco Bay Area" - in press. "A Financial Guide to Drug Dealing" - in press. "Marijuana and Narcotics, Compared" - in press. "Lets Talk About Drugs" - Eleme:tary filmstrip program on drugs. "Drugs - Facts Everyone Needs to Know," College and Adult film on drugs. -34- � �� "Utilizing Student Feedback in the design of a Drug Education Program," (with M. Cohen) - Proceedings of 1st International Conference on . Student Drug Surveys, 1972. "Conditioning a Rehabilitation," Proceedings Social Rehabilitation Editors Conderence, 1973. CONSULTANT SERVICES: State of California, Department of Education, Drug Abuse Education Project Bay Regional Instructional Television for Educa- tion (BRITE) Drug Abuse Education Program (Chair- man, Committee on Program Content) California State Colleges Drug Abuse Committee Drug Abuse Education Project, Scarsdale, New York California State Department of Public Health San Mateo County Drug Abuse Education Program Raytheon Learning Systems Company United States Department of Justice California Medical Assn., Subcommittee on Dangerous Drugs National Commission on violence and Civil Disorders California Interagency Council on Drug Abuse San Juan unified School District, Carmichael, California California State Assembly State of Illinois Drug Abuse Project State of New York Education Department State of South Dakota Education Department Nevada State Medical Society Utah State Office of Drug Abuse i Campfire Girls Strategic Air Command -35- 00'02W4C3 OMER EWWYME T AND PSS' Adult Education grog rams for the Counties of N.arinrn �9s'and Drug Abuse . San Francisco, .Alameda, SonMa and Mendocino, California. State of Illinois Drug Abuse Project State of New York Education Department ' State of South Dakota Education Department Nevada State Medical Society Utah State Office of Drug Abuse t Campfire Girls ' Strategic Air C:o�and -35- P1iDJF7CTS: Adult Education Programs in Drugs-and Drug Abuse for the Counties of Y.arin,..San Francisco, .Alameda, Sonoma and Mendocino, California. Bay Area Schools Council on Prug Abuse Education. Initiated Summer Education Course for Teachers, O. C. Extension. University of California - Medocino State Hospital Research Project on Marijuana. Instructor (Health Education), Sonoma State College. Lecturer, San Jose State College. Special Lecturer (Health Education), California State College, Hayward. Student drug surveys - Ill.inoi„s, California, Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York. Participant, and Rapporteur - Ditchley Conference "Dn:q Taking in the Younger Generation," Oxford 1969. Referee - Journal of Medicinal Cbemistry. ACCREDITATION S AND LICENSES: Qualified Expert Witness: Massachusetts and Hawaii Pharmacy Licenses: New York, Texas HONORS AND AWARDS: NIA Predoctoral Fellowship Merritt Lectureship Rho Chi Pbarmaceutical Honorary Society -36- Q 1 ff [f i ; 7 1 q 1 1 , i CORPORATE INFCRM.ATION i i i a r 01 5o SECTION VI . CORPOR#TE INFORMATION GENERAL RFSOURrrv, fawn u»f"d ur*Mn nr qmv -r„T r, T.- i 0111250 • SECTION VI . CORPORATE INFOPPATIVI ' GENERAL RESOURCES AND BACKGROUND OF THE FOUNDATION The CRIMINAL JUSTICE FdMEA FOUNDATION is a private, non-profit research organization located in Sacramento, California. The Foundation was established in 1973 for the purpose of conducting basic research and surveys in the field of criminal justice. Most of the Foundation's consulting activities have been concentrated in the areas of program evaluation, designing and evaluating training programs for criminal justice personnel, and executing large scale surveys related to public policy development or fiscal issues. The Foundation employs a core staff of four professionals supplemented by a group of highly experienced contract consultants from a variety of backgrounds including a statistician, a computer programmer, a criminal justice methodologist, a criminal justice education and -training develop- ment consultant, and a police organization and management specialist. The level of experience among the core staff ranges from 4-15 years, much of which has been concentrated in criminal justice or directly related fields. In addition to their experience, the staff of the Foundation has been concerned with the development and analysis of state fiscal policy concerned with such issues as courts, corrections, police training and retirement systems, and education. In 1975 the Foundation completed seven research projects concerned with evaluation, policy development, and program planning for state, local, and regional clients. GENERAL CAPABILITIES The areas of general consulting competence of the principals include: PROGRAM EVALUATION juvenile diversion, narcotics en- forcement, police services, jail facilities, probation out-of-home placement, work furlough, police- coamunity relations, intensive treatment services ORGANIZATIOrVAL AND mental health services, community MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS hospitals, local welfare programs, local detention facilities, educa- tional programs, state prison system PERSOWEL ADMI27ISTBATION classification and pay plans, per- sonnel practices, workload standards, personnel examination and testing -37- V � r POLICE TRAINING AND performance appraisal strategies, CURRICULUM EVALUATION goal preferences, police opinion surveys, police administration, career development patterns, long- range planning process, police officers training standards MANAGEMENT INFORHATION development of management and ad- SYSTEMS ministrative reports for analyzing cost, workload, and staffing for probation departments, workload studies, crime analysis and statistics BUDGET DEVELOrPl NT central office procedures, pur- chasing, inventory controlr plant maintenance, transporation needs, accounting methods EXPERIENCE RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT Listed below are several recent projects which are directly related to the objectives and work required in evaluating this project. These are all projects in which two or more members of the proposal project team have been involved. Contra Costa County Probation Department First year evaluation of Adult Drug Abuse Preve'- tion and Treatment Project. This study was the first phase of a continuing assessment of the comparative effectiveness of an "intensive service" experiment designed to test how probation re- sources and field services can be strengthened to deal more effectively with adult drug offenders. San Mateo County Probation Department and California Youth Authority A study of the comparative effectiveness of an intensive adult subsidy supervision unit in reducing commitments to state institutions as a result of increased training, smaller caseloads, and greater use of outside resources. San Mateo County Probation Department An evaluation of the success of a special juvenile pre-placement intervention unit in reducing out- of-horse placements. Supervision practices, family counseling, techniques and diagnostic procedures used by the unit were the main focus of the study. j -38- i v -------------------- Sacramento County Probation Department A study of the qualitative differences in pro- bation services between intensive and standard supervision units as perceived by clients, probation officers, department administration, and outside support personnel. San Mateo County Narcotics Task Force This was an evaluation of the third year results of a special county-wide narcotics enforcement unit. Characteristics of arrestees, utilization and training of manpower, information exchanges with other law enforcement agencies, and dif- ferences in operational strategies were some of, the program's features examined. • Evaluation of the National Free Clinic Council Gant for the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Evaluation of six free clinics in Massachusetts, Oregon, and California. ' Evaluation of 'DETROP"--the,unbrella social service agency for Reno, Nevada. Evaluation of Alaska's Methadone Maintenance Project. ASSIGMENTS RELATED TO THE EVALUATION OF OTHER CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMS Other examples of our recent experience in other areas of the criminal justice field are noted below. California Department of Corrections Second year evaluation of the Department's Correctional Training Center in Modesto, California which trains all entry-level personnel for CDC institutions. A sample of 600 trainees, supervisors, institutional training officers, and instructor staff were surveyed for their rating on the content and quality of instruc- tion, organization of the courses, and knowledge trans- fer. The study also considered the feasibility of integrating certain parts of the training curriculum with the regional law enforcement center. California Dzaartment. of Justice--Bureau of Criminal Statistics A survey of user satisfaction with a new system of information services to courts, law enforcement, -39- 0Q^D3 Probation, and criminal Justice ugurated by BCS 1973. Planning agencies �Y was to provide feedback BCSo n us the satisfaction with the BCS on user's Presentation of onr.»,r ,. supplied from the syst . is correctional, Second year evaluation of theDepartment � . which trains Training Center in Wdesto, California. A personnel for CDC institutions. all entry-level pe supervisors, institutional sample of 600 trainees, r staff were surveyed officers, and instructor of instruc on to content and quality trans- for their rating d knowledge tion, organization of the courses, an feX_ The ���, �� considered the feasibility cult s of the training integrating certain t center. with the regional lay enforcement California Department a_ Justice--Bureau of Criminal Statistics steal of user satisfaction with a new A survey of us court law enforcemento information services to ' -39- 0 U t:Jtl I probation, and criminal justice planning agencies inaugurated by HCS in 1973. The purpose of the survey was to provide feedback to BCS on user's satisfaction with the data supplied from the system, presentation of output, workload and costs associated with servicing special requests. American Justice Institute This study involved surveying 300 criminal justice agencies in a 26 county region of Northern California for data on training resources. The survey covered budgets, training levels, and sources of training provided in courts, probation and law enforcement agencies. Department of Justice--Bureau of Criminal Statistics Management and Administrative Statistics Project Development and pre-testing of a data collection pro- cedure for collecting uniform statistics on workload, staffing, and expenditures in county sheriffs' departments. Commission on Peace Officers Standards and Training Course Evaluation Instrument Project This study was concerned with the development of a low-cost, self-administered evaluation instrument now used by POST for identifying strengths and weaknesses in the hundreds of training courses administered to California Peace Officers. Westinghouse Justice Corporation A critique of the publication program of Bureau of Criminal Statistics. The formats and content of BCS's major publications were reviewed for the purpose of improving utility and circulation. CONSULTING ASSOCIATIONS The following represents a sample of the organizations that the prin- cipals of CRIl4IAAL JUS'T'ICE RESEAR H FouNDiATION have worked with: Office of Criminal Justice San Mateo Criminal Justice Planning, California Council, California California Youth Authority San Fateo County Probation Department 1 -40- Bureau of Criminal Statistics Lansing, Michigan Police Department Contra Costa County Probation Department Department of Professional and Vocational Standards Peace Officers standards and Training Commission National Institute of Mental Health International Association of Chief of Police Michigan Law Enforcement Officers Training Council Eureka Police Department Modesto Correctional Training Cabrillo School District Academy West Texas Council on Modesto Regional Criminal Justice Government and Criminal Training Center Justice Training Northern California Criminal National sheriff's Training Justice Training and Education Institute system Center for Administration of Little Rock, Arkansas Police Justice, DSC Department Fremont Unified School District Alabama Law Enforcement Planning: Agency Merced County Hospital San Mateo Elementary school Lake Tahoe School District District i Alameda County Welfare Department r 2 i i 1 -41- 00 01TIM OF Tin: UI".�it;�a, Gr C'l'ita„a ►l Justice Mau be.-rt".i,l:;ffter a";ard of fulw 3_'s to k,`. ]�;_�•ass.�rL��x dc�s irssat cd t1:�- ,sl,�3�:nst•:,3" ansrlc s- Use �of TWO Z,.. po t �. 3-z,i:.•u. Ct:SM -Czstrc*l zu>~3 Sfc Sfix ::s Act of 1%8 (JC�T. _hw—oijual r deSig:satr� ” arcs Str::-ets Act"', in, tsr.: aonusst �.nci;.�a�s,tlta pu��sa� anci duratisas��+���: set earth iu .i:l�i_� ��x.sst award. qt Pxoject Title 116". At95�€--2- t F Adult-Drug.Abuse Program Yrajcct Ko 195►4 2 �� r. Project Director (i m_-, Address, -Ir laglmue) John A. -DavisSts `u {I� . f� Oouniy Probation Off Icer 55B 5 5, 10th 'Floor, Administraflon Bui!ding ` 651 Pine Street iocai;Hated Wit:h : � � 1 a rti nez CA 94523 r rr Financial Officer Ubm, Address„ Tele�ej them�fatc r s � x�x i3oun ► .Audi tc r-fionfirot ler ata2 Pxalect Cost ' FilnanaP $tsi i d i Mari'i nez' CA 94553 t fr 1212,939! " Phis grant aasard ew—s' page, the applicatia� far tese.'grant;whi�rfi ii aLt�?� a. ssts of this title 'hereto as:A:tach ut A and wade a art h2rCal, and the Stan k- d-,,-tract 4".rd .Cont c�rs:s yr*s e arc attaehed Iter---to as Attacl>i--rat. A and raft a part hereof. 2'3ze :Straaitee ,Iicy signifies its a.�ce_ataaof this.gra.-yt a�rard a'tcs_agrees to is%?L�t2»3.sG the.giant Znraject in accordance with the tem. an,�Irco0— ins or utcrrFor�tr�����:' h�• re +exe��re .in Skis' grant award and :he,a - o�rSsics Sa€e;StreetS Tzc i ,-`..-�^�•r,• S�':GL'S OY1C12:� Iiil .�'r0 ZgYt Lo 'Stsbgr:itttei r ,` 'h .a '`i •,.� 7 Nam: VG� Tit'e: (d , t�a CQrsa w Ca. Bcc ,ofu�e Address: 65U Pi neStree:- vy fl 1� 3 c�'' fk�rtinaz CA: 945 rp '� 1 } 7 t 5 �Y BY1 Y� RA hG_` iii .� all usz:it:ioas rt e".:�tistio:i 'se;: for Sl: in St%s*. Fmnitsv�:�i nest '` ',Sectitm 1203.13 '.kzva Leen ccn;plied with and flus docu�sent is ezar.�.t iru:.: revieur yj the L�t*i��.1 its•:n k Gi k'issr:ane. k BYozt �"DAt r _ PRD ECT W. 1954-4 PR)J ECT SIAM►W: The Adult Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment (A.D.A.P.T..) Program is a county-wide project designed to effect a significant decrease on the recidivism rates, particularly in the area of property offenses, of indi- viduals referred to probation supervision who are drug involved or addicted. Unitizing a standardized written screening measure, probation referrals Indicating drug involvement or addiction are transferred into a pool from which control and experimental groups will be randomly drawn. Control group subjects are assigned to traditional probation supervision, and Experimental Group subjects being assigned to probation supervision by deputy probation officers specifically trained in drug abuse rehabilitation, techniques. In addition, Experimental Group subjects receive the services of the DrLy Treai=nt Ctordi nator, with expo::Me in =cat.lonzI p.eparats ff oa and program placement. The Coordinator also develops program of drug abuse education and prevention for Probation Department staff and the community. A.D.A.P.T. program includas a continuing assessment of the experimental method including a scientific evaluation of the results of the program. A contract with an outside Rasearch firm covers the program evaluation. The project objectives for the second year remain the same as the first; ' year. ' Attachment a 00 57 I f i t i t t `A tib •` is a:• „ ` `•. ,�..r.. `: Ct to e„+ • L j ' .`♦ Y• C tit } ! •C "\�- 1�►.:�'. Co ZA • r ♦' t'. .rte_.• al t sy V�• •t \.a♦�•aa . -' � � ..► � � : - i tri {tl � •\♦ a~`'.a`4••� . •r-�„ tJj r • +W .-1 try -r`` "�•av"' _ N •. > `. t a t r. l s mac• f L t" 1 N { S`•� \; ` .. CC-41 '� �:1ti3 ► -a. ; to c-, 44 � mh= L1 is � _ � U �* � � - ! � ,,._�.•--„';� :t`��.•`,.•r; C' �.�\\,r�..• C14 ' i► ` mss""”' � i- `n' .•-- � •"i N;' Cit i � �\��.�E-w"Y�'.��:%r: .. 4-31 s. ca Gj ""' f i tib�= i •-t L •• C• ` C ', ev C*j `za .w r- [ r3 tom._••----- - ,N.l �`"` `t?�t .,. el IV"! t.-- vy� t!'Z Z z.> to} ,��. i f'►` � ����� � ����:�,�`a� + ter ✓• •C,a• �`� C� 4 �ti is '`fir... V LZ to_ Li- ± • ,� LZ t� f `F` , .'. O tC)�i t} uhf) V: ..• � L1 ,7 �? �...� t L'• ,.{ �'; Cil .-i •' ;��:�' ..:-.r^ CZ 0 Ci 0 Ln . r f- � i ,,,.,,,...-•'-•""•" � ! O � is � t f .. t: a� ` •. �: t � fir- c Y ,.. 1t-- ra. r• C C t '• J�+ T'' CJ .taun r � :.i..� � 'rte.+„ :� t � ::e G+� _ � �' � to ►sl � � s .. is {` c C;�iFc3 `: i 1vlrL tli:�C�$ St1�E LE1:;ii'c_ •G•; aur•-I N HARD ?btsa 5P===='--StS 93•,0-to I 85,016 10024 S1323 :_ol= r ice�Lt=.- t. Coard 17,856, 5 ^"S/ C $11_67/fr_ 22,125, .�: 3 w • 22x225 ^n_--or3_ry SaL a=y 3o h_ri3/mo.0 $4.97 ,7'13 .4,779' Su3 ',o:aI - _ 139,791, -$5,016'1 ' . 54,7751 i Yt__ara::- Co^t-=,I-_t;.oa (17.91) 23,023, 15,218 .9,805f ' I • =00 ?c�9 I;u. fit: "AF v ►':A !.... Auto �'. ? 8,04'S�t � 8,046 ` 7 aos_:._o,s S37.22/ro- - SaJ.00/ro. - i o� e_ ^_tee_ ?ra^-se + 1�4c0 l .s 2,440 i i G `L 9,486, - 9,480 1 _. '�, 0. CansiAl-t-Zat. Services 2,400, � � 2,406 P.rsea_cz a Z-valuation 21,458 21,458 t —107,A 23,853 ,� 23,858 r' t • �r n nnt .I - AL ' . • ,,, �, i ttt7;;i.. — t �„i11�i.L r ��U TS S{frit`. � . . t:'� * jBuy-j yi.1.. tr ? t �'w„ w:.��i s ice•..'? {w•w.. •'i? ' 2,460 ' 2,r460 3s0-4 3'024 co e? �iso:==• "teleysa? t 51772 . rte;. 5,772 - 3,449 B�f-_-d Q C ase - 3,108 2,903 222 eS'?z PA r' a .xat-s�2 6,076 + 4 0 � ► f: � 2Q,7�� t �► rJ,55�i r t 15,213 !-. f 939 . 103,231 ,tel s, 1 fZ1.A ".+" • ?: ��i0:'J"�'.':`� %yC� t-.ts Marty CGtlwintlixi fon paces CL...) as u...j be ttt.Gt,55G:,jl 40 rt.3t:te ti'r.. 'isc,i.+S iJ.tti,yef-s.tr �3 ;►;'`g;,c�% a%i::•aLiis in:% cw.,iii;'e 'Lite required Justification atttinz... ifJ i ani :wt;? ,�:'f't„}?e.o i)=.. Exi. ?i.1it �fi2 5Gtt1 Ci'S 1-be granteet:ill tt4iI tit? Tc;-. i its ..:.�~..'�..CiZ- :, 'RZ. Li i..i"�'!:on. Ensu',era:ta. `hose proposed prI.G. I , as specified in R2 I �, { A i ,,......�-•. ti add, as many Coll - nVCessa. ,� ..,� ``s• Jt =' r'n % tea.,..�':L12S and eo s esc i.lt� wQP r�� E.'4 tl:�.' Z-10 ,.i-' ' - -- �'• n tF�eC�sar Ju"sty " a�! rct I scurc�-s ,. rr -.:..:.csl:;: - .= r.�;. :°a� c'r;lr« _ hex g ,.� ,TC;u.r2 vf",V: .'i:L i y ` ,4..` �f:ose fro;as 41, (s f :Cit tli�'2',-+�.:4 o f t ..7, G... z-. Cf, :.sc : F �,�Ec1 2n: ur��u hc. Qud ' n, ais �:aua7 Sia Gtc� r � ,'s° prior°apgrou�-1� rays b�- :de► '':� �t ►sz 3u �t-co7ers t�ze' er 7/3/74 hough G/30�75 '1'Iie gxa�ahsa,pres�r�ta�£o -� ?� •. ice�,ws a a.�r �? a e co~r3xtures du .,to th Y a glans znhir� c � a �t zp WL =44M forstaff'positions'is based4;"on cuxrent rates for these c3a�s iCa-.. ^.s, 3lus .ea esti-matedj..st .zt on.July. 1, za2ov»r :�.. xts ere based on =--en�t p=;entaws. of gross wages as follaas ,- So� 1 5_c•.. .ty� _ _ 5,05 • , R::i` ``'tbntra3ut.:oa a.92 a , .77 .- 3.7.90 •. 5 � ra ,tea=eaa�d. o;:at-o�.ove. is �-�-- for staff'so 'that. sergency;and, vrnere ` "" ♦.wry-a.•.'M.2 ��a..r ..•.-.y .w z..r.� .aw,..►.+ c��.,ir be: � `�as; t3sn3u .xz � yC?� ], Rv .� titl 6 , 4 ♦ . l •••�w�r . f. si "Auto Ht leage" reambursea�nt related.'to the.Adui.t Orugr;Abt�e Programri IISe3 ,Y` made In an amobat established; by Contca` Costa County. The rate 'per mile r app>iese:aptoyees' of the Couctty,. W, ther under,a special funde f ro ect; l >4 or, a regular .operating unit of Coeenty. 6overnannt. : P 1 a I%thea Travelf expenses include,such,i.iems asbridge totIs ' ob'relateid , ;parking, ands ohe�r a r3 .l _ expenses. incur.rrl,`by Lhe eop,toyee and:autho��zed far celarbcsrseaen ' ' Yr by ;Xhe P,rabati;on Department. {. k jal • A ♦ r -coaw.sta=ts M .DIY s.�w�i..w.-Sed �= by VMY ., st:3.-tests in d=g,ab�M? eow�seliug arm rehabilitatis . estia te-Y au: is'�$15.00 fay a .total o: Iva ':ems. . 3 eva3uat'�va ? -,met ray be done undera ctmt�� T.nt: Ireµ�ata�as�� : -a c.'�. :aaearch Cosater. Prior aap -' •t.ZZ St. <yt3t4'L:Li�Sre rt ' 3 Sf..r+ 'Yy_ .� Y'°� x�M\i M# �wi'/s•f#y.+V 4+*.M4► �"+ fit. . f e 0= ice s'-p9 ios, !aoks and suhsciations am calculated at $205.00 par month, w2nich xepresacts a cost _r- D.P-0. staff a ronth of $28.29. � ••�ic=moons at $30.00 pry roach per tclep?er�ae represents a total budget *%7 x $35 x 12 =ntmss) o: $3,024. Uzil T..1as and rent of Real ?2opert amounts to 4` +� � t !r y $ dl per month, or app_oxim�et I 5. -er =� _cr as asztiaataz 1050 s, ft. of space. AND CA�S Th= project stat= find it necessr•-y to help several probationers under supervision t. ze_t sc=a o_ thei_- basic needs fo- food, shelter, transportation, clothing,, etc. ram,es is are ra re'ewed as to need Xnan probationers are being released from custody have no one in the co=unity to tL.a to for help; from yowng adult probationers (18-20-1_a_--o?ds) Vna have no se's a:ires or others in the comm t:nitf who might help fi^_r.Zc= ?y uatil they can find employment or enter an educational or training pragr: f=•ra the �x62=w.ioner W216 has an i=edi.ate need for transportation so that hr can r,:.:. a=d en??o_r�nt; af_M the prat io^wr who needs food and/or lodging until he recce'L SSSS first ched1S. Alt yc=ugh there art sone p,ivate agencies in the cor-uniwy who provide.limited funds, Most axe unable to neat the irradiate needs of probationers. The majority of those y6:- -Sner- Mrequest ^t= ::ft—,;cc . hop !tom Vl.Ae Social ocial Service Drug Testing -sin? be p._rfo=ed by an outside'testing agency. • 43"-53 f i .J 21'>, Q.3� ;�l„ :. i;�l: �a• %• 4t.ij 7Lh Mh J•::_ 0;th II i.h 197,044 13,3-30 7 33,235 2 � i I i t 3 1-09,470 is F 53,632 ! 43,733 ; t 23;332 ! ST P' :J=S i t ::_ r.�r•_.::.� ;'�.:iS 1X17 7` � S,�0 STA,US 0: aE c. 2 1 �• S � is • 4 . r This application (Oc" r r'�-� - !!,a �� � co:��Zi:�s na substantial changes froom the last co: � (oCJP Z e�.e rant _ award z ContractIng in objectives,-�x � �o3010�•, saw / g and et alp ion The following sections of the previo=as grant award referred to above are incorporated into this subsequent Year application: < Objectitas: Page Methodology: Page hos /-;Z Evaluation r -Page bos. /-j� - • r . - f • w Page _ - i I i t lu THE BOARD of SUPERVISORS O COI►M COSTA COUb•TT, STATE OF CALIFORHIA } 1 In the Vatter of Application ) for Hands for the Adult Drag Abuse Program. Probation RESOLUTION I10. 74/1039 Department. � � s r 1�� the County of Contra Costa desires to undertake a certain projecL designated Adult Drug Abuse Program to he funded in Fart iToa un Ede available t&ough the ibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, PL 93-355. •'-s s=ealed, PL 41-64-4 (hereafter referred to as the Safe Streets Act) administered by the State of Ealiforria, Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP); i NOV. FHERc:E-7, BE IT BtwOLVED that the Chairman of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is authorized, on its behalf, to sub=it an Application for Grant for Law Enforcement Purposes to OCJP and :.s authorized to execute on behalf of the County oT Contra Costa the Grant Award Contract for law enforce- ment purposes including any extensions or amendments thereof; and BE IT FURTHER 3ESOL11iJ that the applicant a ees to ! provide all matching fads required for said project ffncluding i any eater ion or a.ez:d-ent tf.c: eor) undcr the Safe Streets Act and the rules and regulations of OCJP and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and that cash will be appropriated as requ:", l titer c.`ry; arii ; - 4 BE IT FUXII ? RESOLVED that grant funds received here- i under shall not be used to supplant on-going lax enforcement } expeenditures. PASSED and AMPTED by the Board this 10th day of December, 1974. cc: Criminal Justice Agency of CEMIM COPY Coats Costa Coi:nty z reet[ry tbar t[dtr go a ran for a e meet Cavy of tie rcftkw dw.wMe=wwcb[w ow flit ie mr atdr- Attn: Mr. George Roemer, 98""=t, 'A' ra++rd& X&prwi Ly rhw V"rd of Assistant Director EPeci'vce of Cmsrt 47""t''colaty. CkN[amia.on CicrtA:Ssr' r ATr Count Administrator st.W[t'oCkrL09 said Wald of SOD.f'IWIF, County Auditor-Controller Probation Der-irtment �' [,( 0a k RESM-UTION, VO. 74-AC3 c I Q0 cDD a 'r P J s ��y �qi ",', ,'v"t�� 1,. 1 i i _�",, i.may 'a t q b, �pp� h�F x�?u ,s '� 1;{ 4 ["* ya - 11 .11 n '' ,,lo, t r��:�" &,,ifs ,-fir 4 xt!12fVz",,��+�6 `"r r� -�Y.:,+ "'�F�I` J.r i4^ ,s^,• ! ,l k �weM1 tj S�1''i-� h N } r 1� j rt i1 �Y ,� ', r 5 - '. � �� 1 M1 iI��7 I ,�f1�+�MT'"� ,11 d d t 1:! �1 ..>"t.'! 4i�•L'} --111111,11 ..-. r L N r 3,,to,_ $ '9 - , rt y rC >4y y tr'+fZ5 - , ti�. - y 1'ns�iiutl t0 Lho ZCV': Vii 0 11iIt3C �'� r►f!C I380 E' '-I[j; o (rC�Q -, Z� 3lM. �-Orfi ot'GZs..�~ijw JAII;ilcc gsw,mxowr (pCS�} .. ,q�tablfsir$d` -1111 Iti 71.1T�_�jo�ex_c eac"c.1wrr ..ssr..c4w—v to 'lima,-:azifosa /a��)OnI'ma=c.t�t 6 Cx 11, �� 5 Jin (��== 1.MMtslme iwaztazl" �p�'.����M�i,�■ryC �Y w��l I 1w �y�,{Z.,�, , 'N I y5 Y - ,E x., t, ci t+w7W/ 6ou" .� �M�f7�I.=a�arMa{li.iQ t���.`W IrH�' j r�+�R's + ' J ��, of rG^ . r $S 2We Z MMS LG= a4 a 13atluatyt 1, ��:� ;ham ., e �" air r df :` v -a-.�., rr+}rK�l , ,fir, s. f n�„;�;`' 7 K q y a. s r v.„y'y1 6 '£d,^'�*AL�'s.� t ej3, w _ �;d o tbA 5alsrAa.'sl I `T.wq, C, "1 ":-- mss x21esl W,araessdedv• ~ � "� ,�� t : x:, �o ,Jr,�, J d -�7 .t� 's ' 11 ' P }tiL?Lv �� c kms's q wt r w •a GL'iSfOR- ��' iy�r s.,vM tt'`F�:r-fir, �+ xF3�ozw.�.�s'Si7 C � a 1 �ZitA���11Y.#�.D.C��2�s���i-It �� L f { ' j 311 a iiC�Ai1 s� Qx:2UeZ��+w ry►,.i t .rka s �, 3 c 11 rr f� g 1 c Y M1c � 11 'C- {�-- l",trw `.tt',y..,. �2 f.r�"'�."'f�'�. -1 9 y�!'.`^tv'1'^y 1. r r j { ',^?I C^MSR M IiM�11t Y t �L .h1 M.y 4 i .F,p T ��� {, i'f _i '1 .tom *S �.Y,*r rrg�*Fy""y- rF *, m7. ,` "'r_ tt, f3'. M�i1?t2AR LO ' `'2111 t►�Z11l�RfOLCita t 1pp t j ,- LS x a ) �" a ,�w. x ly �. +*"s'"'xay,�' aryy#,,�'b ''Z 1'` ��i`�d.p�,,'p- �", �- ': s '" Y�..'13"'r�`tt t� dl""r f�' .rn S *, J`f . t� � s +"-,« , � ,�xb`, r , �7r Icy, , r11 h f{S1D'LtJRZ�`�":yZ'I@4 5 O� vr�FG OQ�A1 11 O �sw+c Mr yk ° 'r ?r� ?y#11 '`Of:Z •t i 4C tri , A �z in.�w z 7 '` �� �.f�? 11 ;. • ? [zstR # the �mlt2i11. x F 3a s.ZtL'G� .St �tCC�',i, , Fii.S"�_l�bt%,1CZil'QCi�Rii�Z' k r 7 �i2�� Sr i sr, 210: "C.�R' --:QK �lm�' 4 iii f.� A `..'F`w yam, ,'--,€ .-� ", cj I.�t.t G il E': cca,►axsd V ..L� •L >" ftSVin. .� t� .� x- . < ,1:11, : �r k x s M � . ;_ wft tt � ' Ilse'totZaW g%sworisiom ate bk.x aov..: to tib GrunC A�+as^d faadstfoe►s c ;w mow. 11 I }L i 11 5 S'd. �'�"M_" SmuritX ana..rriv rv. Jh` ]►. >, Su3y -►xs ,a7,ze+r: i.p" Rtzcc �;� grd.icy: ter 's.;xti+��X. Ixt 1 �� otbws "tisu. the Crfa� CcasCr..i fit c!�' .973..��i1 as : r �s" £Os7G, ki Ml n_f a i. n of :u c.�t;rI I or:.`am�u�cijwtx ,,pix ri a t.o - 11 � _ 2QWlA Aar ta�sr*zsb tit'"atati«tiGa�' lrmfo Sip 14n �ttti22r�R� � t.�r��q � any: rr � a :+fit!f,ial�ir to"`aag., �.Ic1Y.ic y�r#vau• ttaatr fot wg z ,y.P+ 's"S*n et`,io than thy► y+4 ry�,Se iar z+bicb f s< y4f6 l:a11 l It �x �-. ;..tion l :l.I � ftpff _GoPits at €uch iota �.. ; lra�uts �t�a� . a �s�js� �� n �x� "I 1and.r_11ha21 ssot...+Itr�+t:_tom cassr►ant'of t3utR: s^sCn'llfust..isf�uuch, t .y r }P JP{ • 3alozsnatiaa.;he a�aai.tted as''ev.14e a or U� to X P l 'f - aay acticm1. # Suis, or other:joi, - "or a�siRniatrat" P,F",adiags r x 4 J" B. :.Cr3ad�a2:blstozx► mformatfcn: R ' .fJ�, � ' La= Ct..R_nai I'll2sisLwr� ,,'iXCt2TtfQal XSSCX1iCT!lp6X�Zt�i' ✓ a����t�� - iii�.tlZitkcl tliLd. *d bX 2JC.r eistalstcaaes aQeACC a; ' � EaC 2R3At3 '`� tS � K pqa - girc+s:es a! fYl Cr2 Si,s « w �i�WIFfte,i . ,� � F-r fib cffessc'�cri sxaia. ; as t ',Ssaeec, ara�n�sries awJ t a t..,- s «A �. ,r`r 'z ' k.,,�; •�` ;.. az7G+R�I x2211:ti CIIF :a 1. d ijY«ftxOi'e C+ '1. .GL X C 1C�iRS.. w4 �5 F _ aa► tl11C] � CGiZ�in itt• `lltZSa�f XaA. iTs a°�:lETR' C a ro .1 a ,.. i All :tom if th4.sutq- st�s�► tstili�ees "'Cr. �s t0 inLQsl4Fat Ot!" � .t �t ,r5 _ w �Yr tl� +Ss3gzaatt* ��3 1.CCR.jt�f til.,t tlla;.:#a?3�tsi►fAgf h � 75 1 t++ S>L'� A3a`-C 1 ixt*Ry OL1�3t Qli QOX�CGLIi�r Ottf[ � dt;.' 1. �� _ a df d�sseminited;lith comta�n� LD,;'t R. .��QnnIn,t j6aml�bl*' ! ���� diapo�r!t3ass :sa ye►IZ aes 11" a11sst 3+►ts ilrar�r ask detafs� t. 1. 3 LR!!*�R. 'Tb�'CvITCGt lQp.igt"fi F . tstdill�fssatfcus� � 1. Iof;stcds'iutczzut£nIt,ss;also].i:'iskei'>':g2aae::w►dery �coc dwda�,;zeasopabl� ii s --� delf d to 3asssrs t2:at ai ssseia 3 asas�3oa 3a tuapt. ciiirent* k` tbes eis3I else suhgua1.tea acid a!&Yt,ca�+tr cci a �a r-taasstsactas� ` _' ' � = ,:hall:, " * a'' L . - sac A,".' r= �X�# iLX �satormst�On �� r 1.t^� r tLt Y:;" 1. bC trr3 than sescls zssiross�a ca's#sal2 oselg� .1; ,�.. ,. be nsad: far ljw vnfororieat assd i"erisa2. catsc�r,aisd gish , ,.� � i�.:: iYSQS^ L;OQ�: aST TSQjY��Ci�� xY�yO Jr ��� ` _ r� ,' ° hdas -It /yy'C���.��4��fi�n:.,Ij.��.�4fe�l4�w.r..rY�i'SyZ_C�. l: iYs�l.if,R{�ri fW�R�},�N����1r ♦ {'OgXgW,}xt'S�} , / � J }:y l.^k„ ,.4 .g'y$Pt �' - ooesta,'ssad of�s #[!i'itlitfi�li:ld lxlFt - tF tlfitC�ltaLRr• {S f h{t L t�/"� ltsooagstete, os lydatained.:iss violat1. sas afgtiie I Goatxs�l:ltct: of 1973:.rlataL' ::poaW'aatsstactasy ticatfoa1.a11. !`� r W ' of:. %`_3ld j=tS=Y. bIR.essiL:t1♦e�/l�t�+P.ylts�iya�+��a.041.11 7coatf, . " j,, i_.'WY.pK :"Y r ' i4, i4>ti..."�G F"" 1� ,7 e' f }' < /..+. Y ?d..?'k S .W tyM� �' , ^"' "."�I Y+ M ar cartectlm = `.. , `!u /� .. :Y .. �. y _�w�K1ii�. �!1'� �Ci:Iii Y.Fi prVj{iYi7#.hfw/1R� 2 '{' r S3 ...fk+"��' .{" = laosstained Herein 4 a;.>tj*t C:b CmtX d ik ! `� �y t � V.S.C. SdCt4r.0 337i (C '� a. 0E xuleR ;Za >:1:�GZZr_! a 11, Or�Z'a1FStbCd 1:1q"t % .: SST ba t at0t L� f74Q �d SXO��IQO$ ,>' �:r .1 IiA.adslitiaa !aa a 4t L p atty tq�osssd ,* lour.. �� j IIIf6r1.F = rr A •,21ss srtce:aiszssr..dr tbttt tbQ tcztw3at fss;,aassr*a lth� `� �; ,, S�iUY cud T iitr^� z� t4&uie 1ha22 bs ssr appzogr3atc. I,jltp ; iuCo:a�1 corn ar+ccu. s satst az alis -agstxaets. " <� , r{ . 11 rr, �a x# ,rte-..', I r, I - r. 11 I f .. I 5.... `J"f � i f r"It";;;,I r . 1. X ?Z T4 ~". f Y1 ° F, re '"^f 11 e. - .4tv ,. /�� i ria�.a r• y,S 4 r!.r f„�tr?; 4 t a at .' ' t yj.. <'- -r d{ t 4 n-ya t,rY `' s''�;•z Fay y..{-t5z s ' "'d'' 'S ,a? T ., .:a. r '.: .u: 1. �q{ ay.�.ay pan I b ,a, za fa 5 �r rj'E�3� �r�.�.. .fi. _ x ;;.r r�. .....-:Gc ,.�, re,�� Il rs,, Ktii�il`° i ! 4 r I .1 fi z } ^r } e _ '"c s. �b air t r fi`6� lk,.ie ��' l' t�r4 a i 'y4" R�r4i6 jud,i !4f �.;�-1 14 -- d 's� h 3 w a � �5 t1^ .f� -r k y1. �E '<s a"�y r c,e a ,s.`3"cr d z�.x ;:� r� ' +Tlj, t a 1 k 1k a ti .'a� $ F� a :3� +iAl - a r<K t d x► "r 2 E > 2 I S Yx 1,,, k 1f' �p 4 p 'orf�4-111y+f � 4 r �',,g � - tS`' g t 'L 'v .+y. t �a,h rs"�;° r 7�' �., t P r ��, _ ,4 a ark r^$.,... '1,41 '' 2 yt t °a t r*: ,ic °�r.Jr.T'. il ' ;�, _ �. rf`;,��t"" .'ter Y3 t< q�m zs` ftpi' ro+c y,-r w� _- v �' -T 1rr—4, .•''N �/'F.��CHMSF�""F FA ' r 11 z r fe3 t' a e ''3^'3S & ter'. L r - 3 ,, d rt. a'a ° "yrtrtYxt k"+ s r F _ `Sr 'a T [.`."Y`Sr'l r 5.1� r y+'2d`r�,�y.s •e&:_ '' .c r ti r 1 r xr � i e1° ,e 11-'b ' 4g^ +"st".ems sqk. .�y 40 - + 1. , w : r �11 Ia- Lh:{ • ;x,�tu' w a: +s Fk'tl .+.�l.r:�"1w�:.Y.''�3.'.` „'.. 1. I 11 i 1- I ; d ''y*'>aacw•�."•r f t —, nr41,11111,,,_ Fk11 � PRNId �0-, � 3� s"� `�' ..r-��-� g,F � ,c s 11 -, , , ,.-�,"', ",,,,,- ,,, : - , " '". � I �i,�4 , - --,'�:"--�:,,:,,,--, .'-�,��—� -��-� ".:"",� '-�Il - ,�,�.',�l,�-"-�'-�-,,,,,i,,�,-�, "ff — , �-,�, '. .��-� . —�� ',� , �Yk;"�%--',;—, ",�-,-;� "� - - -�,.�-��-,.�,�,'',,�,��1,;�����l,","��,,�,i, , I � , , e� _�,"', ,---r,;-,:,�,����: ,-� k - , . , , �,�� � — i� , � lt I 11 ^' -- , , - r ,,, s'l a'i... r 4, "�*a s` 1 �4 s x �tf ob'-"'ra 11 � � f ,�:, �::�� e a 3 ,`C. 'H•r�. uFsx^{at51su" 4 i W- .t 4Gr i d � i"� ..- :i..u. "€, w.y,'�,"s' Ar" '4 ti ifrt `' �,&-. 4 3°a>t'u>Ta, Pi — sYi P, : we s '--. .,, 01- , Y 8 is a .' fi• ry"t�'F"",,,✓' h`= _ 011 �. k. �r y 'r �''. y -11I11 DHy{ ,eStiti in ;' ! k �T'^ ,§t •a v. .•a�, ., •�s ,yg•„x 11 P v w �n�'..w� ' ,ex i � Ytw �. ct-:ys'4j, aC�Y�'r�.3 { - 3 : i 5: '�"` �. +* '"r ur ,,;, i`y R'b'hrC°rktswts r°`°bj f�' r "-F- a h-.eJ, f•,u u''qY` ;�'� ,'` r i,z �3,9 'K� rr'c' - i z a ! rxr ,lrr wi'P 'rr r .' ?SS,y y T Kf t X' :.3„ & 5 z r 4' Y.r." "a a'.,ax ,•ci+�'•.,a ,yry'S' ., #' 'w,a. ..� w ' y/ T :, F J�Sw + +M�w+'i �6R W 8!R'�ar tx y4 fM � '�f y, "'�Jri'Y s iftt I M t diitu>+�ss atY+w4rt t i++Ar i1+►�4►3x +► 5�ft re#a�etroa ^ " 4: �= i�^f*� ., {�.�r s! m '"t/r�{r'`�'�+r/" rt•Snrk �,:^s, r.mt �"'�t.Yi'h '9 K. 7 t Ji t • Wwts" bY'? F"�ri'bwR ` f�i fi1E i �� jT^`�'Sy. P�'wQ���'�F•iIy "n'°-_ �R+R... .r ^^, a" , r>r'.�k. �5r "'x r siP .h `�a',� 5,r [e0#,.tinct d G~i A*►d CAa d€+4ils*h'Wh arts a>l04 �i4?iF t� #a",_ I.''A •.s �� e iyGr C' e' ,� z t x4 „F' xSha• x - .. .. .- S� ` ry Syat' ,f<,.. ,r,•rzd .7,. (e �• djy '_�. IpG�R Ai �_/yy�� wf�A fR/F�R uaf a�11kF'S ' f, ", Y q1 t �a` .e l �.-"`Rn :,, �i � ec in s �4s ; } �a s* d,DP t lq F `�: 1 i S 1.Y ,9 C' .P4�i FT_M �� .- ytf'a*4Y't,� h",�{.}5 y„-' e'�� - ", $. A1l�!�. 1i[t l, .t�4; ►t 1 1�; $ i�MIK!�iMK� � ���dd " r r � s>�xt s► S ►it€ . i d►acrrns , 11 I- e Lar k e lfcxa�u i� .a+�� >� r w, w�+��y ' ?' !t i v i t -i '•�' ttr,«•✓3kJ s :rs 1'r c -_ •tlLR+•4N.- c . *r`*y �'�'M 5 rr. 1 _> K .r;I'llr,� - r s �'*y� b�„t '*0 '" t,r,. Grafi `S LYt'�'f ,Z� 't' .'•, - t.t t�t 114t to rt lihw�� tA� -,f, T I M A�, 11r� C tF ' ��K x "- +mittht�g to tutte�Aaw+is cit t t„# SsS Sl + 4q , s �-r�.. � - 'tr `n --i-1111- ,-",.,n t gVl e .tJ x'”. P It � ,,,,Z5 f '-J. naa-�'�'i __ t s etr .,.ryye� t ,+♦�/�- H ':11 tt✓r�.`/� P iR�.y'{+R"��/'�'.�L�.�•..,lM`n--. ,�`r.�rY`�% r ?.' �; z �,wt1!! �tt t' awoi+rd 1[t'7i F�+T* +"°IwRTRt .f "' ^ ''�' R. �R•RrwW/R,F,MF,�Mt*'l �r� 11i � 11 >t 1 tid MIRYS" In ttltt is ,4k b� a��M1..�,�k`�i�'r G�I��' ���d 7�ti ��. '�,p�;gy.,tf������ti� iP•'�3,,,mom_ .}xtM,. - w�Alll, :;F ;' kq.Y' pd h'•j'f u{.C 3.'$'{� it _ 2.'DlIiY�M14A� •If � i�rol�t t�as;tuii � uAuit}diet! ae+d a411-1 1-1 ���t+��a�. �10Ktt���th�� �� z�� 1} 1. 11, ,t SU�i11A Y1tKIt1 award;w�tha+MStf of t+e�r rtt►e 41wlaf1.tMs!K? i t11 �,n0}liiK't1ti� tQ itaYs,s i jJ4, rQnr+t Ot s 6A°diL.',t Pr . iq ,l intim i�A"ice,_ R�1R it*�iSOIiS�Qi� and;, t1�Illx) s t► i rtdt!' m- i w M h p } c k •v w ; "'' I., `11 f a�!,r `s n 4 nr'r..rx*c G Laa .s- "� , - " g �3� tt � f �_ t �S 1M#t �K tt11+t.CORi R it 11 o �R 4t,i, K-17 iAt�ttNllwv 11 d ya fr4 (rw _ i>GM7nIt11E�lOdl i ttit4a{R!#t�1C SM! t� .ttW_ .11 -. i>g� t A °i +nthi t - atter the.mcp raual c►i d.9Q`tiay;�exa►d�_1-",=,Q " o r a '^ - "mIIIAQLL;C1drKpjt'rod,alwa .mad>nd4tgtaYfni"lwatd£� IrvaG�at Ido �{ � - F "^ t 4-.t t M F - "`*�1Y `a jr�F�� 'V�l� " .. r �Ja 7�IR..!'R�+!""x.v ,' f�51�"^r+.�, a` +.s vim' f,� "T- * F j.t q d"" f "� J ^r."` - _ �.. Illl e t.. ' .,� y�,l4- �`,� fid, "�`�„'. sa E -fi.y.~:tG,.Aw'1,, sF ' ^S' 4' d : r J - F ,z rs , ",,`J JJ#a`s°3"011r � �LL �+ tt itfy l I t is�wt''�kd1. I 1R'I b tier Sing nt I. 1 f l 's t ,, 1 " ,r 't.�a gl - '.�1111, " da �rloilc�>GRi i - Of tt�lt�j#E'tl IlktfM� M-MVtMAIAI R1Q 8 lQlki aW t ��1 tie penned io ba fik¢a#ta tha Ic*�►wad t �cp�red. r € ":-Sa {..�. -,..: v ,3•�ttt "''"M#vr,, ', tC^ d- ,-,wt'"` `t is�fiy`."' ;r:.�.�,�. "w"4 L F brilA I .x' �„ F .{ *>e2i'rfs .,,� hw x: s A ;. :t a y�y+a-.j.,ra,`,'§r' .�,»*S"t+�r fs3f r i� �s 4a t" `+-,S y 11-1-1 iia# noc Yew iFoaid`a t#-ttwe oxo ct t bt u► rtd tu�s�d!�s t i� +'41,¢¢+ +t t so��~,�;q t1iS,i; �'�.tiM13tI ftol4 S t• tz i bv, t'. jo iLEAA� y lcr t t1 Lflll sib tl sf.. t# � f t Y awakd;:`4#o+raQj*WGU&+ak:��t rf-,+ ; v;�i+*r O r�o�:ccsn >t rent a�' 7 W€�r�cu pert9 aux tai X prepaecd anad titod,onit�;t CJ1. ria� � . : ?4Q dips after Uh�date aL ihrt g. .a cargti s",BraWii ct�ttst tri p4 wntxen,.cos�npk><e,accr atis. !p•axst;* xst� ux Ct .1 ni sts foii�� t�� i �I, -M QY3ttt3i a § Y sad�ci!sa.i>e i d?is.t"tft mfl , ..= iw+ :Dtx stst at*�t tt#a* >R!•cif.'ai rs .t 'sG� ifs ac+i avXarct aft'> a a -mnn� ated,te}ion 7t3 11 nniteas zrs tc•.; a Ae + + ,eta etar Ge w� l b '1-111 ranted L,lsnd tw: rr7�sstit .w*d'txw+;at6�e1 t be,tk�dl att ta!Isar * °:� wsi;Ett7n evaXua f z m Tsai peia period�s Gli i iur:i i,C. + .X s�4t c«u► 90t.?ona1�-«fir itw1.e dit+e+�a#x s� , ;the cwatr r�€� x�r ' ' be by t c = x�` rx �d .alyt�ra v/ �e�#�ws 4��� : t 1 t zs ,1 !Jay, �a �.M yam` yy� R, .R6'� •7+T•�¢"`_� MR.}�w�R�i•[ �T�Y. y �^�`�pyf rkn� ;,111 I �l1 rR J... 4 �46iRMl..RtR��W�R � �#��� �' �� �•- `i sYY, �° `t"' t.. t 1 si Yyr., x fi'ht t3k'.*r fir'"' p`" �a thiiZ ftWl�o11 it t#tl! 3���.:i #Stt " !itlM(t MEit411 f �'i,;y'r1 k 'rlt �C�''4 9y ., it S 1 �.ty5d""�^r"w,F. t'r` �*pk "ta.'d "i '` 4' ,'i{•'•v'� , 11 11-11111 '1441, �`§yye. F.y„ i T L S�rc E ✓ 1'..�c.V3 r"k''�"',,; z'' av Y ffhd� >�4 +;P *4�k7 fit""X' R 7� v. ."" i 3 ,� m :*,r '4'x. F�St :z'�x �".,r„`., 3, ; y., •, '� y,,,.� t =l' 3��f...z...r�n y �,, ark i �. � 3 s"•+r'iwt ...`tr1 Y of a,.,,. a5 ': -. `'�, , 1.+ �4•Tr-� � r r �r' 1�14�1.:;� �,, ti'a,I.`„a��s�T, ';, . a3,op rsnt a�.a�d +islop ooadttwns=cootapat r ' Via) A�gwc�xl��repo�� �t�e o�ar�rs off' � fir #` et'ttuereet-�" �tro � �� iti .C' ` �R ?. M.}6� "' ""sT•AiF'.3J}E<w-f.777- "~ 5�'+ K 11213 �+psf4y �' � ou _ ""i Ott § 4fA/l�dFiR111h diy t rt L ,f Pop � a 8 4t VS -�"w s � a t„ � r .. y, .. '" ,y .�.?- 3 � s 7•L A.."s.-r�''�. > :mot � h ry n s3gltir)�!"1�1�e�aat�'#cAd"tt�t+�� � �t ar ,t�'wEtl�s�d � � t ... i ; k�. �$tel e��- ,z ,� .t^w�bM"♦y. we2t,• a•S ^V rap `s .� rA •Npi,, `f joi VY, �.. ,yX } t�,:.x m� . ' !. tA�4R�IQt�Q�40 1f+'�"��i -OK "' +, ,r w^� (� YY `54's; w 'r^�. � '�^ � .� .'- . t 3 t<"•� .s�,x,� "",� A'� 'y,��,�xi� r z'� �ryx r �_'.. ♦♦ j�}�,�y1i.G��•A, ��tr.�s,.,s�y..bery>� � rF=- �2.`M�^�T l : xy. ',?'�-�IM.W r i qyy�� 1Gr�er�apat` 00 A"• an+A AW"""'M iy1�tete ,,, .t *W} °� k+%�-w�:.�^��r���,{•a}R�AOV, a � 3�i�y�+�w,iw'�M�•.! 4 x -�i r '� ?'' ¢.r � ��k�� .v�F . �'t :w�, � _ FTi'Pe'M',��s'a.�.y D"be¢y-���S'�..�`s.c•�A ,tirrvs 4��rF44�J^�Wh:,r.�VI/��M�W�r. '.�. o�"u 49�f^L �c,, , s "+ �•:�a�atr.�v►,,,x y�♦r{yy"'���vJy�.'rb it�„.a,Sim�.�,osy.[��'r,�Ctl«/���1��.�.kc'r�=tec /� t ` :'x1INT•§, � LMA��F'. .T+M � �+, t MMMMt V �adittt,s r be r�4d rVNO 1 t � p. "�""a a,�'! � `1 ;_ ':: � �rx .x� u4�§•i,?""�{,y���{ �}t`�r'���.b".�' o-��,s�t7��"J '�+ Q �r�}�^s'ifi�XF - D ��wiliflp ci!$ in t i2r7�iM iT EN ,., PR s tlY �( CWM � -rat ±*4,17F- a t .x_K�fILR�� ilRl�i:#Ar c► i�l!3Llptt "r ?»� ��'y,�, ( - � � } t+�DS1 4811 §it1Yf� C. X�C}E� tl ^.� is C,t..... f�ri .~ti,, .,dt�t � ,� ro ra•�, �.t?..t^s"� a r t t 4 .., �+ttc A`'iN�� r �x �''t3 rr. . W �1a rnx+Qr a $�`Q�1f. t4+ q ar [ect�r ` �w''e- �wtp'trlD}�t� d��.O f!#�ji rlrti'��.,4tC 14rt #M�tli �Al 8CJQ11t1` K, rt .,�,,axw•�"'3� wz a <A:�'f � r� w�..� ,, } t^. 1''.rt 4 t-� j�P �,.k+iY.� 'ti 9, y�_. " Lliatwad�i,Afttexii. Rc. � rt $ $ ��,#ttiiriz�tu� tcta,•�w+ tF5 314 tI �SW Q. ` ��aU#oma �a t� Ai_��1tt�'twt 1S'�DiC!'"Il��'L�L�rii�E,2�X2�A1�+��� ��•� � ,�' `` Q �mazt�ed�#�• �u"�F�ntt+e.Cts: �u. �� hie txen �a,�.a�z, �{ y ,�, ` +�` tto+u dt�r+pE aant mph she�.,� ,nc�Q##f athc" R rMA X70 Atla+aaWe fosc,c ad tx7t cf t f.4h qktiz t ��, 5�er�tal ipr�tlai��l+es ot.'�la� +���+�3�.,�s�ir+scls fiat �r,�lt�z►�+�+aaF'l,��t���.�t`.3�'.�t�""�Y,:, ����QM�?,�` + dpauoutata $?§Nar l:tt« �e! Ma«,,, lr � 4J4" s a !! i�C611, iat�d �ptnfi� t4l+1YGl �:� " s. h „��t A ry' PRS,^T�-�t� l#00,3# 1"._ 1l��+�x2i�f, 11►QY o'" "t.F4'°` "` e4m;�"�n������� ?`.^ •��' "+i"� 1 � P '�:. L ;,z r -u s-�a�y'w �u§�"' t s4 �� .��k�d"�..�� ' �a"��'a���"°` a � � ,'�- , r a �k `�. 4��4x' •x";�' ` �'rr � �fi I6 ('ry. , .� � {�°i�`i��'",��, ip s.. �:,�^'e�.c ry •� ,���n �. � �`'�,� ���a�h�r � , >��� r r„r ' $ ", ,I,,�R I' � �:� ,u� e �;i�ji�al i i, 4 x $ tf F .3 1 1, 4 .Si % z i )3� 4 1 ,+ h.i j ) + r L a i F aq .� �F§ r�.7?'xcr � , -11 Anw�� it>4xls;bip,,th¢ Subgra4 r �rit4r3►. EM!ta►tal;coir 4l> 44t fors arE rt4afaNr'" v,2�, C#�. DfI—I�1R4a1t1�S�Cwi1.t i1N#[1�.f11/i �j�0# CAO 'Li�f+`St tL1t�,OF�t�SIKIfIiRt#e O��#��itAlllt�����j�F.�*vvw YM�l l�r� ��4 y� � - AS#e:s, 4�11. � -� CCGf t s '�l✓," �^ t r r i N�t xill -�" . . �. rr. 2k ., -F F k z t s. �y ,.r ,ifi.�sit 11 #,fl�D,�.ttlppC Atft. M1t�.'[ t. �.r' w5^e� � *�.St 4RF 4#F f ,:F =SIT 4M a {.M{,n15.`{ I.iy77,' ip�"f'E3- p ! 'e 4 ,�y,�,,�M` A• ....Ft ♦ t+ Yy-sr- — "'. kt}l�YQF o Ca�ida�x4+tr� e'.m*,v + s.1 ,00 R+�lt 'II10,1 ea��a n•-9,g, �s t�ZM!#tj tQ 71f#!k#C t{71 'tii0 of c M , ,Z,_ft,,M*,."—, M.W n "_j�"��`312" , ._18 ^�.�1��1�Y/V��' ,h 1 ?�71 t_110 Y'^q pSaQ� �S,s� „1�,,K,: ��,��l,J'{ w,i � �N�S,$, rn'krI 1., i -' '' a4 'i'gyp " hY"E6�'F S�I 6.; *4 r*M'� x,. '7�ate. 1 S4Ed4 #croft� t ,,,,0. rw.""O' P. ,-" i+�t tt4e te�r� o���ttM�ipran4 petro thy ,# fi +t ate.r -a exteris44x4es tltaerrrof,shall« 5 ,k r r i g� � a ie l w 1 s rsk x> .�r ,� 11 r a S #�,«3-#�k 4 ";,A,AIM' ,,'k'i '" 4 , r'r.3'��' �,Sr" _ - !x added W► 411 ca'', W* tar f bl►CCC.t snd tia�siii ►ts atsd be�liGd scE t�IRtft�I tot�P,��",� y-r,y``y"'+z5 s"hJ^`' a.ry,3" r t. ,�,y H pr- ,+y qx `a #a'#� f'- ova b"k �.I:i r . qr n y,,11, rt rr.11�,'�t�'�o a r+.. , a••'"r'''Ilj� 7.:roa n moi.)VIIi�F �,xa 4�+? „se-ll,i _ 2� ire adedu4x4sd irom th4t'totat isrsEiEt t aostx.ft3r p14�f of die th4 �t,costsort w14�4�a� - - - # a w' t m� d b shaecto`oaets+mnt11�1l "�a 'r ��a f4 "v' ,y ,, ✓ d J e e.i nSxx F9F z " �+SeCh oEtiet r4"47eI 'ttld ti�fG .,�Wbgta�l atl4st th4s !f!d Of tF4e grants j ll�Iti 1titS a 1 ���� 4 MiI"} 11- _ �� a+ q�x r@M K10h3 h 'r - a � r � i 11 ,] " = a °'� "'s ,'� '� �r'*4 x r Fs tt 'r 7 s .�£ �. � f t !� b4a vscd ,t,nti, r N4git4, tstiirv; recti s 4i iM.men tt�o•agh feat f4:r44�c► or the prof 1;11,f N ° ' �. �� �,- x r x, P d'�"yy .Jr 1�1R!11ttIFR!'fa4[�atith4ai 4fIQprM! nottiliSeti tQ f tfiwar 4:IINy�it__piK �4 �w si �a dl�� ; 11 I 00" C4_11447Q =OA b4!a�Mi 44►T4s&f,1�,4Ii x ss a� ter a e d�' a Stats'aC Cat4ianrarain theSu4�ra4t arllttpiS4lraR4:t:ana�PraN�trsatc,repreaentat4a4sOfatfilbtatelCal4fo +raandctftIv � : 5ubg4anEee sfsldi m",t an d=4 i4 for th4a t rF �f 4ea4:h444g su_M�a,gt�pmr t4rEhe"abset,C�,of ani„ ether spxt'ic agnde:+ 4►t t tw4eem it.:State of` at4is+raia a44d tl Sc46grar►tra�ain sucEr amount of m ;r`� ,' project 4ncxw:4e sf411 b8 paixt.ta►the Stane:af Caiitaar44a". ftstetal sham ad att 'o ct}4ncorne`shait W� �, pr K A _� _ , g4awmrd the srr4e.a4tio as;th4r ttd;txai xhaue of the Eotal pN�eC1 tats"t 4iut44x, tr4"grant per�odFottf4 x " lt" > 11 , ,, sg �M^%'�r F t V a X4 Ancwm #toai other SQuroes. Ail.,; �e fio4n `otf4er .soutces :4eC4s4+�xlk c,,,, ritW� Ta, T.V l�earocf sr,CE a� ,, 4744nt4' Ntt4o4K,do44stu>44s cK i1.unc3s t�an4�rin a gragt txogra 44s,m44xt ba aa4xwnl d to an4f repanrtedta CCC.f��1 ,,, p oth4x fed4:ra1;f44R4dS w4ti 16e i!pli4rE4l or itt4!! fay ttw pK f*.i%s of ttie prOfe4»t.ftin"bhp`CCC,t an4i th4M Subgtarste4t y M f`: `Vo -T w k _ +'an,d own �`r &r r , :, ?� x � , t f el. ' 3, ,iAd Reuatton f>f R44 _� "° s t , � -r11 *��s k ,,, q e r r a A Re4 &sh.li br rr4a4i+ta4>e+4f.i n aft'%ou e��y a444sn�nrr aad;"f W a.aEla�toy a4 it .`11j rrosris to CCCJ,C AA;V X 4° m ar tt#e Ca4ltltvWtc4 t erx�rat of tt>e:Jt44ted Mates or tw a44tt4r77ir4te4i; ,a 4tatives.Subgtantees siatf ``-11¢t . : . r1.otm#R'G x*4du y_ t.1#Rt R14 Qtt4Et' *a � s d �1„,F 3C 3 'a { `� 7, 02 r - c F''r ix w B Ttte S44>>g4ant4sc;shati Main sixth reimct%.as CCGt shalt i vr Ff),w a �n acco tfance vx4th�th4 CCC.t , ' { /Sta/A<f+illS, iR 1 i1Nf 1t4t 3=:4,Zg4iliti11 ,am ati Array bye samo fira�n;b -,!,*Aiq? "bt����.'�.trC.t moi{�iCQ[i 4�`4JS,f�# mow'} , r �- !!lEalrled faMi a't1Qno4t"t4i. feast tb4#e.ymv ThErsetendarn p�rwct it�1��1t4�&t11 I 11�a+atwo,"s. SU�ITIFaiw4roR�lo,1� r the 3finm xfbc"tfie<t u.z, t:4.s ,;jluee-yyra_r Ir reteot4fa4t p r4ptl 4S gwU4fred asM tnikt�+eii �t} recon "` �nonenp 4dabie lxo wty actma d vu�tl4 Yvant fe4nds shad ba rets n t t�iree y(earx atter 4ts rriah 4l4sttOsiti m,?I.,w hVh.ie:o4�Rtls are 4.aMT1'4rltt to11 . ,CCc.I,04 ttsr ee-year.ate,�t4a ii,44iiiitie4tt 4ziwc aplst'i` -11, to the.Suttg4anteE;3t.r wt *nest. Retawne�3 btyatnd the tWm.vear i;4i t 0 apt augsv 4n cKo11gr4assorth4t �.1��NAN tindi44gs,ai a it ius6atett au4i s�_ r..sr to Ir;resotxzd rat�s�taetor4ty 4t an a4.sfit1.1 Coi>tple:ecf a4uf thu i►4ufi L 9'$ 11 r . ". ° arc:�esoi+ied t4.'u i+s ttrr 41�.* }e. 4 4s x3�Reca�dx Ws be reta�r:,ed w�t�l t rif s t,'ue , ,,,,, t?����t m{ v the three yca4,} �atMt liar S ssrd a4ri*c o sifi!t lae en it4t4atvm,th4t:reW1dvv,A.p GG ret.... , ,4w acCordanCa _; -with local taw.;if k9i6al.ta+4:4r4tu°1 es 3 WnO# Oemiod of temd x4 tt�►ti4m t;*t►►e�etorsis wr►i!be aifaei. c < '�� 1 e. Ias,set forth,in,suhtaaragrs,,�, i3A. Aio:i,.<?CCC.i,cr.lEAA 444x}r ui4st::, _c. of Cactauz Sobgran;se I - it ds.to.CCC.i t AA st+o43v f4om the�Stebecantea YYtf4l41 •t 4s 4�4!tEr'X9:ss tat the retordspossess� €,� 1. tf)44�-�r�M w1. A r 2 11 1 1 v � �}+ fP tf - . ,F nr. # r F k"*d- J,z.c ter 'q + 11 . � 11 I � , ,�,,.r,,,,`,;�"I"�, , 1 1 d A '^ _E a � 1 ., 11 ..11 1-1... 1�111-11 .","" . = - "i 1, a., r war I 1 1{ n�.d�` ` t ip. -yr' t s��:y Z "y 2 s3 n,rs,,;e x a lWynn u rf , x } _ 3 ,. Vis£' n 13 Fw sem"a "'* { �'^�s � C _ s, r a _J s g a 't o t YFX>'17 x s £ v e tom-t� 7y`� zee I>#,., t e '`�t- , '.."' _ r epi `<,t�.u;,`, .,s .d a _ z.y 2 't tr 1}�k R£ 1;e£ �r'`� ,,O ^.?F`s+. i4,faspectwax ilid AndFt. TfiR ,x xr GQtr, ,". r F► f O iota�f�nrtad Q I i # r ` 1. "11,11 , itxxlip(CW ,'flrETlritill►Vei. txep h t !Or "e&� ►#_7 d a dta xltaifQdFx to 3! °bQO S t QGCJlI�Eftt �'�f`"� w r �. ' ;?Z "' ..ext ►' ,', moi,✓?..' W{xvs amd reoarxl1.s c1 ihE 77.C SStt:bg i c arxtt t4►rias r�f�ar�d%r�o�rd r4 anue'scp�stracfas,.� X fxa to$e saaxx 52f 4E x� 10, ive* s'AriLI .J1�x " to sa i�q 100 "" ENE _1 ��` alfa _�"'" �, ��� ,� t++ 7', 'b dr J. £r r k,x d 4 F v ' .,' t s ?1 �a a "�. t5 ?'itis t0 1�iik ie Ota*t+r ai�us.; l n�A txt'�E:,}' itx :Yete S t`f ffefl, $ubg[ �* r IY trx the tee r , ,xltlffx« SSC ♦- { t4�j,tme c ax t�re�o(px{� *xt�. (���i SiM cwjm s , I tea C)M,gC� , y�?Qjdaysatte�,jt�Et�errex►d of t-.Wq; x,;� 4 �,Q 7R�4M1 �i s�of ltl r v;,"kf •aa!' 9..;wwtxien,, 5 to l� tm*W''inl x{iC�liO�{af.wsintirm,'' i ,�*'"'M." dS. tlMv txax af,fixe C<:C 3 fWN-M rxl Alf�u+s� 1. •s A.d`att scs�}:iiq�toas of C jet ,,, a rwefcfiu can - - , M►ttlH ri9C,TixilZit4F1►it iar AtC�CiiLAii ti'RSlIX2ttlr? a + i1G�x 11 a1�R�j�@ P� ��++EyQ Gugw, ,W.,S fi -, a v ,' t £ t .nr,�f ,G,wy,j, N ti M? ,rr,. .3+' `1``t , -. �. it1 � IT1iAr1� i.. F►«r�S slat "Tt+�Z QR7t4i °Q� Q �CQ(11W�ilwt1teF DT JAS q '11,11,�, iMrxi�;#g, dt�15UQRtftr,�S. T- aSr;i�*'� df + z or ixi r �* F�and,max sio a!ty^�pr t " . �11.fx O fxdi- , "l�:T C�1#1x:41o4'°-` " r t< rs r a 4 ' ." guar ir�.JLf�tS��»t�i4 0011 s Iter , '. u 6t�1r1T,l�da�3 lw a v,e � farran �+a and t"W ftt. ..1 . s� i�: [arty' x ear' + ,jWca�. i rv �aJar ux p0 a +1 ��yy»» �+Yi3i5,'""N `Li" cf s ,€ ♦ -t',a,..t.rb``�Je3stf'♦' a.*5,.a'"''`a, e .t1.`"`res"` t... v3.s t ' 1"" «Y•'� `1 �n""t#" .lc fe A �� A�'` i �.(: �` 'YVS2 .. - {�..� /yyy�y�.'y�}�` y {��yr {/��/,�y/�,� .�y�� �y�.. C +' # (.. a. (� �( �5`4'tcwr„ f "� .'`!"i 'r 4 t �; �fAt.l .t "Y` 'i-',1 "�, �T T�"^,,^"+�`�'� (R^1�{! .'^si n._,Y,1^��5 ^S.,�iP.fs h�' $`cam �.' y t+M..P f t J is",,, .: j `�`+J AT vy� '_ ixre+�oeebie roue tw 'i atw RS{lr f it . �� �"`"a'..Y�� arta ti'tE 18 SaL06 �?' - � z +� Ott,^ -sem " s w 1 sox xt xx~ii u�cirrriir ext aondrtxarx #i rte. a eazx ,�sa tpnt' 'j R 1 Y -- /y+ * ��} y��1 r�,.„n qr5, + t A�A/��H`,£1,.k`�•fw�Cy �",,s ,»".�fi�,�{1�ta'r;Y,,�a, "7,c y"Us t-MA t Wxi £,p#� R 5.. .'wl"4f :.� s„ "x"" a"x "g$'' � '"`''f'9' vE i7 .f?AS"'txs : tX..i rid 1.E 5•aRl�me xtxfs srght trs rage xl i",st��ra�►t p� rC �r Fits nat tern ctb si?� a5° � ~ . . alRd t 1Cni, 4ilr ay��S�cfi �lltlr° K:t+ Fi�!it S#2 Sr td g���A`a w. e i t* ,y, m it � R c_1� other+a% p S .--7*..+ a �ti� 4 (ac EY1RFeSi « t t #�' is � f1 ltPsaglrk t ;�tfi�p �'l «rx7r„x°'ssd,✓- rte' gt,.,�• Y'is, ;� +c G t`t ,f rFk,�x#s"+°� "�"e.��! exit. Y �8 ifRSrglxilgxf 1111'QiLiMnt t 11t ! �€r'rtx#R � � eSiitx 'WiI L r113 m T1DixtX'�A 3 111iI !' #tat t C€4 r"ctoc l2M! Trs ut �iCiQIP �rRzi[► G u 1�F�iit1�1�llaltOC Txt CC1x$l 1Dt tote � ix3tR! r"'R xY[t St/QlpOlfie� titr -w gr+arxt 8 nd tlxe Sxtb rirxtt ;}r rix`4 lV&C ,.`�i W rxDtx 1.k rxd C.t:J 6Q 7- KdAC�AiG ; jwp4a it11" if��Cr6� ,, rsd l #a+ a +exercx tl e r 16�xca @0ti!_ ��'^ `�Wti 1rRK I ,,yam *., s� ` a �$�S,4 Gi� apt ah i��1Q �SxF�,`Q� #"armL a Ya�� w +6i . � � �a n i. Trxaterial ' urante tx rs�sryar s# ! axis a tfW � ix t x,by x�C + a i�at Stst auxisdCta�T S rxrctx ie°�x+x+s ttilr� x� Q int!tl �.. �*c a pr s: aA A[ t Txx2'ilrrii S Mi3S fixxr'N iii 'i .d feral Lr� t a , '�.,, , `.wt""' " c v , zad ,oe idaxanat<aRxrar+ats#13 Wu ,, vv , , Car- an Ctx�rnai«f.�ixoe l T���� CTFFr�C.orxt:c � ' W �s b R - cE&tea.yai rM1";�';"t' � �. ,,fig .. e�i tS Asi ,1iS a� Q�__-G x,, f �a1R'x GQfX�' I =a� those~a I T"11 x#xeuthor Arid ire Holt° x� t ar 4A=Gtesa f�� ett� >� z ,,�j ,r , s '� x v °. ., z _H* c * ti.€ ,E ar t�¢,t .. 5 '� atr *n�ei WAlQTai� i"+a ���k� lth+ 1atTi�s� S, �AWq fitc �Fb aSR� R $'R, L ~ a K 7 5 'x 1 b r'V '� a•e"'`�°`R§ffl.s�?Lf +fi„ Z.F'k^ ��f`' .}.r "".afi a'�f�Ya .tis i ,. ..... a ,`iITI F �.,., z'�.a a. 9` L 3Y .."-ty vs '6r�t;3, - 8.jai ts.=if,an dry a: rswc s4. tm', iir�f J, . ai a t"CMQf yet ks a tamed$ f � ,x > � vtxdes,tiuS.$tstxt.,"Ir -Sxf x t" « '4t a` i iyir t�Q�� a x� i� '," _ 11 11,; x> 71xiiFde_00L ii4Fll�iir�MtSof #'",3il�d ldivaFA" xiA�eA'T�- W t,« i F ", i _� ° ry iT� �� �AY`�.�__M•{l,�y 7�+FjI}M�* �j�1yI'111fte,-1 .;s .' {�,� ���{ a *� �•�TT,ya�+°jjt ' .. "r ","Se'id�` '��r �v '':� i LL 'T - �` a �III.MAr ��wN_�'Yu t* 1M W'fw . ><R�44wY�• .4A .rv7 $iA A +te. %h11111)11111!11am) $v ��kItT � tti7iNi�JG1 a��liiso fMx xw ie �iA � ""; < xz exis.�:.tu}� '�94`d'wS Z#ext' 7 i +1A1:l�l�400lw '.f� ;,T"' k".�;N ;j�Q h Y Orseel- � .+' i �„ L t i 1 EPA OW" L,`51 � 11�Rk"2k-..iv �1���f �k k fa J{Al t 'a} flo x►sc TQ praCf�aC ixa y tib f "1K C$riSllf r� „�# W fiQRR°Al x a, �tixe usr .txt+Dr xrr�ile►x,645 qr�i iAxQ'a atF eee�str�tt a�d+xs�f� s�g�a ti;z x COnstdiar�t's yaM� A �q ', M� Yom`*i ks ,t �T 1R ^s`#L,I ' 0§t+;+' -3fi #..'^+Y c; ax►p txiezlry t rs rant tun ►d.+i�r #i�-+ a t 44�Mt �1 � t3�1#� "_Ij.;,,+ <11 "7TxA � QA E►iEOC1 tf�R�e ��r�- S1xi11 QkStt thitb $Ate, 't t*i40r.�C 1Ir } fri Ys ; x a a 3 k$ 'kl� WZYMM ., r a R 111 I It ,rs. - x�1�511�1#�1'iOf.i�'Q1111i !rlr[i �wN ls#�f¢at+.1 ' .�f1 J T xdSl: rf +iS31tF !1, x3I�i Idlllei 0&"d 11M S 11F SIi .CdCl tp ri'Y* :1eCQFA�w/ f", 11�fiif[ ' v 7� ," -_. of`i. ' �w'�*'M'; f3. a1 i'' .ttw aiR' gig," tiwkR`F1'� aM`d '+°4L" :,1'gF ", � ;�e `rtO _ ex a t -Y xt F� i H+ t .lxxtixae, 8. ? 'ih .t; Tf+A ii�T+ JE+ lr*x�oett«,r�+�fi*^�11,' * '+`7#iC'",. ls- r ! '}t�'i8 ,4 r 1114 „oda 6� Y 1 f Ad S�"' f fxla tot�o .'R3rx tx � tet cip vv.!Cra+ft,,C`" ` �!R_60' ,e�'i' F"i» E� [� i1Cw1io, 1, f . � ##!. i�1i'f1R' 11 F14¢fes- kR dee° Lk 7 f$tfiFt; ' Z L* tk*si' dkE1rPA€i k i .o 9 tt 1i` r eta�4 JF ' kr, r �W#ice. t)r�lillrn,� i+Gxirxi�1. ice:gr .rsR Tf a ' ;„°.. b "O R" +rF�t-a 11 ITrixnX altxl�1liTMlr a ix/: t 1�4r► xk4tS, 11 .tt �1TiiAlT` ?i $aa `rte «t+ i � � rs r5 cY _ u� ;s -�'� ``;.. €ate ;" .f,..:.«vo- r r kA {a�i +RT . Ai fry i 4"rkt - {- { £ _ F' �$. �4'M cif �, 7 I t a C i�' -4 x.tmt' dr+ -a..y rg' u. t*.6 .-� ;,L", '� I'll 11 'LLL � `F I,i^ � `fidka ,.... rr ,.c "nraA•�` U "'- ,.tin xr '.,a .;'�"'�'n,,.:i+-,4 a ,...�r4', .,,:. _..,., '.,�d+;'svr`'.`97�r:"':nw�e,= ,.��"t:4..;` ..F.'m .. i.. ;.. t` .,. A4 v.Y�. ; Y- �. 'a' r S'i. '�ItIQ.x A, T S g "",AV «.*•G 3y��,i t Y`..Y+�C c Y, •i� r ,e « M � h �r itis; Y 3 ,. ,�- ty •� a'_.^I ,. , ,� - ,' r S t .n"J, v,E'lA�,i'j •�1�µS`�Y y}�c�VJ ✓K, ,�Y ,� ;sv 4 - f - ti•=r { b I{ti g5't'"k,�, ` "�14ry ,�k+zr "s ,rG4 a)w i ,'q' q- ,n +,; '4�''� ',�F fes:�'Y�1r��.�111-1- Q� t"y^J"t, < r.r '#ti tTr r.,8'+` y 'lxk fit`; �t,' rY 4) , 'SOC�AOl15� 1 stiff,3�IQ Sift $itt*t .Ail 11tK �/ s /$ /1t11 �i� {!q[ [O` 1 :� r�,• - �T11li�l�10�lIQf1 f��t�11' Oftl }YQ :If OtY fatlfl�tjtlD4i t�fS10�tIf t14iA tOTaN1 t4 ti101i� bi{if10e�Otlwfa4tal itel�j4allpd 11# a' xtRX'i114f1L y r,+� 1 s "l I"daS sg1RIQ pts r JXf illy x'�.. r' rt ? f- � �� J, r,'�' s � +f � r�,,S t a. R '41MI fil1x,i,Sllti�al" l m tft�VyAI A'1S'?� t►-ot,1�R Mlw �+1�t�"Of 14 c.�`. ;''+"Msb?*,�rP,1 a1. r, 11 h { F �x a " L'tk''f4 g 3�' E F ll�', d`, ,!,*,,why �" - 11 W.�-3 9 ktt/ Q 3 't F ,�rr,�� (r 9 x = s, , �l��` - /� {(��/01�111 �/ r y `fir4.�tdP'- /�'�a.{.,� 3 r �rr,,�'o .. ifi7,t M�i �a tsapsitl lt,lts; 4w/�Su, rattte�fMMR�ku F } T b1 —, I G0 1�`3�Mtlb'�t1�Ct�det'hb� �ii I 1— ..�sI 1, ,�.aPA�",� C" 4,i - �lisfU tg&" , _r . _ StsaH 1t 'h i ezf f�fs tMC dCt1Q1►, ta�tf >�i t 4ati. J +F c t x wk� t •�' I ,yXa J7 �F,2aC, W _'w N 1 � y -�t-' ttal- , at ltle 6�sts t c is 40 ,�atsfl wie" _i , t 4 y_` 4 , ".�eo,e Jr Aeovie ` r .��.♦��j f�H�ft ..,�, .X*ht""�7''N A r -"�!. Yxf f.�,l,.,.,�'r�yV'P 5�'t' +° d t ,�-.,. slsaAd. L. M4t �ltltttl►'1�'`wNISa' -^nrfi�rfNr '!�ferry,L`r`�,y�y�ii � a� 9.n 'tr. F_ t lb T l f( "W-IIT m �AlYlti. C �1 fle�"'�rs7s�3s�� ' ' s�z M*� ,t EItIIIF � N; •��y�� t� v1 " y�.w•.•. 1»RTta1f. ssiIliM'Sy".sem M +�10 111YL OI TZ1C.wlg�j�lw w . 10� a� d��h f +" s ' iR (si+es a+lti �a► ►+ u� ikO*Zrft` rd ssrL ftMih�r►tE�e'i1. �FFfa11 �yN e F i r ,� . . _ - - '��iSr r,k' .N KFI _ It+iTw,°'$ 5 `"zR,' ,�'' aTr m'. " �ide7fiT �c +}5t1[4i c-ax - T-I- I taCtS i(Q:!IKtR c E CI► r4 s . .;,da�ataxro ataV��,� _ z any ,f-vlo -,�t co sae s i atux r�a��'- r .1r; eai ','b/�A cC�GJ st .lt�fi��l to ad.,� r4ta�nv�`'?-' 2--,4;� a f al.-yi P v -, '1 �, { "' y ry. ,�lcj 'O4 I1Gf o-wavl1 stt11�► 4afia itld OR1M"►*Y Y. [Mt�iY We Kfi :hB.flflflf�[K t;11 1t 41tKK�f tt 'l�Mf l<w Rf I:;' L s z - ,w,, .,� vt, m e r F S + r 1. a 174 pBYfA�Y�s\i _ _ if 3 ryu i Q�fi''f�P�a' 1� ) 'r } SY .fMr-�r'-✓�11 40 r���lQ+Subgsa+�tt# lx Q,7�?R , .;;tt dS,�e1f Min � tQ � • '.kSFU —No s J S W�1"�'1dR `N,} a �r° s1 t s 3�' -r �s�:i ism sa11 L shxacwss st±4' at�ur!41, t corstraccgp As�y uact,es* ! .s by t�wk aur.ee..i ct 4 0T 9, 4t aRf , � al+�sd ahiG ixawnde 7t►at the ; errt aaw sdt s. e=n sat•a"uf �il4pfot� �fuc► a+wdathat�ttse a mt,t4KW sfi:l.'1# kd by ;` E CMJn 1l a�)Q a!i 4x:Fttr l ut�apRl fQF; �, r r s� a ,r �, 'tea a T '," 9 t�fel�ll liwittlll itt l#1e fAtlf It i Q�th- jAfr+ �w=fr y°s e 'Jttt }� , Y�� r a dI r' x'i r--; - „« 1 `!'"r, k Y➢r'P,*x "� t �,g 1. .e'' i �° l -_ ¢ SAA pith d y�oa�ltrxu tst a:+ 4u.n atss cCS, QC2 l Si�rslt rlat bg,dire atb a�bt cas k- I[ _, s ,x t 3 ..r.,.,.,,{ ,�.R'C' i N"`.c 'r„he-• F wa�fY" «kms'}.t� unle�r,`,I x wtlildrapptQMa!aY o92�trllCd troth GCC.1 Std tl t the 1A1bt v � nrnF Y r* t �r £�IT ti � i f _ _ , `� �1) Ttse xequcp--tcit prii�a4 or otiwrt t,tt u~,t Asl+tutttwg aiw srr.� ttdn a t eatfesene c �k end �lldd l:Oril(M!l9C tattpll;M sv i 3+y �y f 3 r r," M y . a y" t c ti 1'0 a Y tk' f . f 1"' ✓ .c1 - F 21 Ne�aitsstt 311ds sx}asiiitv +r of oombtws asws# ,� , _ ;r Y t"+` '_ r s` f `?y z{ f Y�A+t��?'t`Y s SF 5;ir'^k. r y .." *'2+�! �r�O faFei £ .,� sJ""�"k;�'+ �tla �j, { ...1..,,, F r ,l x k 4 ��✓ YI ' W The watttl�esw s� 40e4l!ti+f�'Ic 5 RT �N - r( y�'"rn+� �. rtr p 7 rpt^x i'�r `.F-1, t r t , - r pn s`r.b S"-."r x ��:`,a ti� � " 7 r r I ` ,-° tr a {�k�'C y Sr .�,,, J r t xi d�'{{�,>�y,�l''t5%1+„ s 4) 1',T 1C 1fltT#CIS+ bmw ec-„ zfi�t.�?li�►iR",;O41 �h1!i�ftiliCECf- a�� alt” �r dry r-!Z' r� - 4 ,i _..� > y p x"'rx,�`ry+"�";r.f..^d 91 -ut . r wr w�.,,Cc="''Riseiect,iit 4t�st l,dtet appr xw tt t)�1Q Qf tf �lotat x 1� p�pt klor 4� � a ^"��'� tCO1lTaftistn1,�t11tM1t11wwtl .►�Q,Q(�;1k1L tthan.` D�. , !? ,, ( � ' a t� r v 5^�fk.+,x'. f+ p < .. Y '7 v "4 p � ra,+3 r'kls ,¢,.. s"°x,,, R „3 �sub�eci a Pcwr wc.tten a4�pie al sf:CCCd as,► ',ssceci+"s�ulspar.' ts of „o ;t+F i patty CQIi astlQunl ow�Y:Sl�,4if0 '� 4;1Il1�106C-LL twtra a rrrs r tb'` ,���Q.". r , c srontracisawM-be ptott+ ttyiwtit3,z!!waw arttsttg y t�CCJi r 4 N y,, � r; ^ "fig`�-- * b� a - Q� jay �- 11 may_ y p t ,fh`�S�,,A !'��/�y z'` "'�e'r2,4 i f�. , r �' : 9...^•�� ty,c�.1111iiGS t0" t�.��i .�wt 'F7� y�,' � ,i��V. }�. 11^^_ W.�' IMRk�.����wr�'y„S a�ka�' paysaestttus tsx of S7itt�0:;+s>�t a sl.obtain rst>re:! s �tr+o�tt� f off`', _, I. I L 1-,,--11`b1.1 I ��,- s T 'ham /-,,{Z� p- I dd`k�.,..,.. x �,f t4' 71� _C slsltr the SwJOOCSi�I :bide+ at d Rw `the OOq�a4t"2jCl jEi `JIGS+•S4 s� �x-rr *;p, rif '}IL1d11-$rt�ttl � s��,fa� E, Aw►a1 m sdras+oe t+fr CCC.1 a:+=Y =h+rs3 ..qty'car+tsact .s"noL a>,tereraG air,a vaett not oQnst►ttste aT~k f t wprarver of any other}xa**t%Km or f flt GCC1 pom in this g�ant.ai+ra•d. gkiM� 1 _ 22.�ertnusa I of Fiords. r k- �a tti��'_ A, *wsdant may be taesnnir I&O,of fursi r•co.ere+:,+cn fttrK!paytss nts des 4". � Cwt or LEA.'+-cam z c ;either folds i wbstasil�11 4 ai,ia+ltre 24� �n`or ssylh.t! t+xtrw� r.d-QOR#:S tx+s.�•'T . 1 s3t� ttt at s :a�`P "' ,h, �, StteelfCt�ndthe leQtl�a%tNXltt; .fJ,►rtRdQ► Ars ;su�h,�ll►t /1a:tc �+w� Pia: jtixj�r 1111!1 - , " '4-� iVrltllfl 11OtK ' aal a ami St7�i�+ t�S t(!` o ,dt- �� .,Seetsocss t(7). .S Q,ac3t:"c! it* SaizScst cr Y - .f { ;e . !! y )"4 i? ''y'4 �;�6 x` �IIV'>� - -y,A tiY..j•yCt S �r'ys,'.e��c'2.. ''r�`4 5 4'�J n a i T 7'. -�' s'sr r - - ,,,�,yn.� kr",:l"�ra a �" h', f 4 t Y aye y {6 ( a ;.`kW.x ,' n , l b' �,• ( �` "` .�4•."�14tr0. ;`aTM' '�''c�, a Y'4r_ '.. �y y �ti . '.?iR r!? pr. !4" i '�^.. 'Sk.'„�� ,��.S;F!�. a awl a �''• a,�, �-11,'','r�.nif` 'ry1?' ,d" _ , c�, ",: .� % - .k f laranyratm the f'edaral�do"^�e+*►: r"t tat+as"ts grant 1 1-1-1111to t]talJ or ta{tsta +the!{tlt a{taplu{t o:t ' T I:.,,. t grtit{t »xd{t.l s;nvide saC0W..this+ aat 1. ds t cnrvedu�atc�.� i satt{a�t atCC.Ci. po+i"d�ed«ltoware.t1 y scedi* a►cncr an cr t {rir+ae{ d►1. agpiV t+ allows casttc a cw�rt 6iSt j � r it"c Sutt�antee to tlac a"ttes"t thac Feda{at w4a toich�efe 2�c`8,iaifk to txCf kir P t s o�st{tt*'t .�`ta , i{ab"'Uty sem.+ut any y» t,'ix aa<rad b3i► ac.bnr.te{a Stats a! t'. t{fann+ar�{al . slta�l�, ��/l"� �R r dW3rd t tt�ya,�{.r��v{,#w- 'llw�Rw"U �* j ?q 4 `4 3�,j� R I 11G' !f,as, "!Wlt al d4 Catcduc: a: the t�MOO tau{su M to th{s grant a+a�au,rl�dzll.t�Rtas srdcf�a�f�ra(I4,,,,I � � ���x. teear My,-autr"d tar a tetiK{"c +it`ironr#t a �as of any f tuwls awKatdtd 4VOgw tants C mays.'i,, >F g tts a d{soteddt.Xlk; a to axecwte e{{r grit awards tar tb�Setttgta{ts�,`«at ita[aNttate a+� artT{at �;y Ii .. k ;, !w"d,,ttay�ants zx" a+ tlas 1. or a'"y othe{• grals{t swei !{arts LCC l:to tha,.Se{tru►st untiTtha dt{t►and�s 11 b iY >` - _. _ - r ' f k_Y 4 ..s, jam, J 23,�Ai1it"Gt: t1 - ' lnuaest- o."aif"t+x�i 0 Oegtq k:" cl a .Lath as uR{: ttf°!oral gan t{rannent ar a!r c►tsa" tL�traa{►en�s y � '. rsntets ill, #ncx tI'L+ i {su ?t3l uaa desk'"«40prm'at,tli app!rota{:{ c rs�rtas{�a�-n;tie rtndt � 3 tI'llot:MWM` "t{Nes t"on.'or athe rr+s+t:n t+Y pr a g..a tit tion,{ utst for r{{lur ar ott►crdstt mar►attta�"„ Con vaa..gratwlr.arta O{t�ro±rerxy, a. air ? ;d :�r+i- in..%OhK lIBAA lw s arc d w it taR h{s rqX =kro�wwte�lge.!{� I II m ediWr��a+rnu'13e. tvrawtxs.ta"yOw ��t4ap-'Qtlte-�.�t~•►�(n a�t?Yus ticw.aga+ji�cr i{s ►h�y{! t '►t secs}/ger f yi'RA. �" irl PleM�ts1't� ..R��.t,+V 4�Q'�f�t1. �R Y^',w3• '.VM.YT "K,;{qq%"— .kv''�4 t �'f_'r7! SZ^,��,.`.: ar s�c a+"y rs�{9!#t{�C"".,+�"mt"srv,%r+O�m{i�re�a►gt z*0 (�4�fi ll{t14tP,t�Gtit,'Lt41�t"6�,A�� . 4�Y�Q�� � �;� Mata ar local eats xt#g tx"{tt t �s�r". a"+t"n�e;►t s atcs esalra�l a+"a�dRax►y.�ttort a -'*a tt,rrs{{tt ut ti ;11. - k,q. .C�.t -. R " r .., R '} k. k , rDr=,= tt a11"t aww all 1}:iXSn�g O�fi l t"pS13M�4!' r §watts gsu}"2 gulag lB;IMttaf t{ at Ili tQ a Y ,� " r �etsott.31 A',$t►g c�a +ldEtxs{ tlf' r s 1 s ,"- a roe. al+a. ar t.+{ t{al{ raak an at!{ t tcts{an�a aalt�,t�,�tt sl�sn"+elt: ar t atlocting adi E{stlty.t�c+o{"t r e of t#"e J�iz.' •. ty of ft a rett#mie''a+r 61 sI*�ra�*ann 1 11 , ,i: ��a 1. L. -12 `24.t�imiv"al Tt"e Safe Sueets•A,cs#t*v;d ss in vw .as�4 � 9dthoem"t�eztfetr�w"t�futlV rrutatypl2es. ,,� f v heats cv obtains by-Itwr!trrty#tt"ais,,m{etS�_at prapResyurh ata tht stttret of a grtant�urc {*t,a oratf`I'lls x � fq"n a ttus ta{tt:#st'tl�us't"tis.':a<�+I 111 r:�,sira�r' ra sty cr {t"di{cc4<j tt t Adm{ unttron;st�l < 1 lte alCd{Wt'A{Ot!'2f{an,$1Q, :�{ �tetMiSrte{sd frK Mii'{R'We#ttaa t"{Y�G4 yta. oc bgit� f kttaakuallll ly aaad Y � r, I w�tllugy°.fals{f'�es.':catioeais t►r''t a,ness uts by t<{t c. ur,.dextga, '{eta'-t"Y`al,yfat:tnrat ►alRt tractI—, �: iS�S {CG Stt�Mq'ttEXt j�2!�ilTaltl to;�t11T tiLl�t at 2!1 int+►f ilf t lllitd tC! f QM"R talsiwsF« f 1 i thtj t{4@ 51521,,, `;i tta�sttbteet m a�ar�"tj6o6 anode",tl+e" zwisia�s of S ctta{.wi.,a,""t111;tle 18, tt iud S rt'.atte.;.R►ntr�la"arTLI. s -11 tt" is{.vMtia a ar rn.t {t«bY: ur ccrattratt'anth11 er fq tt"cf s 1� en€oroa "t {r ram at'pc4j 0.undt Wo ;any 4t' « {� a trxaawai t Sia ttas 2X�yil7t*rn_�exMtea►x `i,Vd dttCttY 4*l if{d ttcly-ltQta tttp Adlit st�r5t L-"- t Stet Yf�1{ts�c - tar the ttraa"sta{s al 37.1 of T. , II Ws{��tat�Wlliit� � w r �i , 114 q P f f � °,r mat ', rA " •; z ,.: h .1 Lt AV�llibItx a#ll{fOr{tlat101t,Tf"ttt{tfar{tt'J.'#{tfi-`{t�Cantracta{s sha41cqmywh ttareatctt{/ettttt{tt C k >f Sect-ar"s ws , of tl,e,W •nerc• t fad of the utc of Cahfoatta and L G{ttt lana,fF oaf �rt,4 2,R r x tRlalitt�r the avM"f*itti=1t�r iC►'#hs t"s. "4G Qf iitaslt"futile t�autis 9r atttP{ dGC1pt {ttlr�"a"'l" "'►�!t� , #4t, �, r ,M w +�'Gttpt'�,axttettd�uue af,gaaAt'tluL*s*Lji�ia�ti �tt`lt� ilWttatYWof LsJtt�f/tlt�w77,lltfsKo�{«l/ ��/C�/A��11t1Q/M1S«/"�n/l�t�a�t�al(►11� x', usJ i�f#YM�+t{ w/Rylllll.7i dM�/if�:• �*I a tt�s+ts �/Yl� w.t' tl�.��{11�11Y, ,i.r3itY' „e� �R yQ,�wA�.F4 n^�fy+'O y N k.� lYr 'eY`x,� .(`-3.,. ,�f_i~/11�'► antla;; I1fit�.jA, �4"e Sut�,r2{tt.�! w"11 {t"altNft a: any txa"t«'apt �Ma4#t1►�i?Q3iY�Ft" a s : 't con7.dtt"a"�11�{n""the tfacti :tet csmt y MNi+"t the ea+q.{aen?a4{ts of tlti{s pari 1�1 {t►- 3 a "' ��'` �yw�...w�y/�yyam� .�./����} + y •��, y���y �/�y���� �.1F }y M1M1. Y 'F p/�(��X .Era. hJt u J'!.{i� thlM"M.tMt4iii t ar Y�-M�Ni, �! u �rl'Auvw^•�^^'"""'..Ca tEMllt-Ol�4•+TRp��T'W ; gv%mm,4.¢F +f ie f �q' .1^... 1. .., _ ., - and There # f ss need ar.{"sa of additt4{"at t'idia.freque�toes btyond thtfse curr{attty aaa{W4r4�"thmSui;, ra"tce„ s 7 theSubgrantaa asices;CGC.t 11-1 Itt"a suds a "a"Lege toy,%tuppwct a.feas t e acrd st:eS,rh�,, "�, idars anets ha ". att+r grant=for�aagw I"W "!such�ur�,arne s �s,car"d{x o�{:ttta Sub ra►rr -ac J sewing Q"rst{a+xutg i�! , v. <. - dC YF f k Y F avadab"tfty,af the r" d! suRphrt, � 37 t gile§e a{"d;t +,SF+{ctat%ondi'ti". Nc" paart {"f tt"C i:`?stls arpprap{tated {1.^' r tR'► gcdrFt�a aritaltdli txr +zsed ta•dt�awtde a tsar~. 0a{+t she saz• 'v .l.cx ana':{{:{�rwt"esation vrhat+e11"var t{t :"ttn+dtxattatYts«oc arJnuaaia.� atlee t esx" 9s ye�tl y, teac!�si .a *tO+i sty drtt"at an"{maitsra�+�+�r4 ha ,Wm y+lsq Ems �14 ' F.. engaged,in mad+irt as Tar xis { A;V-u i; tom.� atyots s the ttse=a#{c►�:s1;R �s t as a `ttlh at tRt�i use* tlf!>i4eae W, ttte<ttatrat_pf.f�X-Vv Ot lure w Clepop""t11: ' r. ltse t 1ts3.a at�'� �F'. tts'sA ,;�� txtrE�et {F Ct�S{t,'i!#Tat",tO,r+kq.'{re t"i- s"!w*nt a 4j: ts"ir of,lyrt�3tt"( Mrr�Sitai2�1.''s1t fa cnr+v r S lt,�F 8t t'^a e►ist�sa#z�i ; = ;i"ff{asis tx studex+ts x", :t:se+�;.ter�r:i tra r' �an;tyair di,„«Js gar y{rr *"m',,.ac>crda tf# ttsll� ` _ a _ - �, A Y"i • - - 28,7txh{""eaaes end;£�qu`4li e t teats, 3* ic'ts chant a++r3ati,'lah wi,.arxy exd!u ttis"'t �fa^t,� r t{m�tac;;ut rsa:{u- Mw.ltmalt�t to-thost,4vati ' N; ofo l juts of wch 4",I 3d'J{ucm �tethraxs+a s 1.exisutt, ,r ��►te�t{Tltt#t�a - {," ;Jusi+cae al the Stag a!t~,at±l+�rn"a._*Ae SuagaRtae as cra rnttra"s ar�ssibto to. y �. d �,sua#t p!tafs �M ti x 3� 3 "' nom. Et C ax Y„. G k r yam, T - F �` •3 '� i,a,L- ,�,=C�x`7--,X y,7`d' �, A ass - '°,rnk �' �- r f..t' x2�x, ! ¢gyp C - R as �'`' t "+� Y [ < '°s° re.r•."1� r "� k'"*E` h �,�'cr, f d ,`Y A: a rkf£k dS fif{"2k47- ` � r v ". g y r 7:'''' s� - �11"I 11 Io,1,If-, � I � I � 'tI . - � , ,,, ��,I , I,, , �� ",,� . -,I I � l X F 1" r r3" F __ �' 2� * W.- i 29,;Condrtac�rns ,w Part E Grants`.li any Dor 4ian of tea grant poJcc;,j funded llh Part?6°fund,tt1 �E f ; tolbwi caxiitarresapply. :tx11 A, The,trtk and sx»ntrot af.-Part E fun1.ds and ntte to property " rrat t tr.�rssie�tred�tokprwatraga es. ,a protrt-ra*" oro hanow..ean 11+augb thane tray W t:�Wnxed i lire uetpktaentaPOWO�Pai11.t,.,sort " �° da, .the purdtt ot;s+ec+ricex anti"Part E furnds ,iKrd praOartY wilt tnt ow d�wa�ted��o�othar than►�` ���� 11�-- rooaetteonsl.usasx 1 I , - , B Srrl�grantees of Pact E funds atxure than personYnel staraiacds and programs of tfae r�nstctutForasaad tawrtees 4 � wgl,t effect adrarsasd prictioes. y , s �? � °� ,, w C. Tonsure that Sadtgraolees are 4%, m protects and pro�11grams�11to a prow tWairaa�ur,w cr cn�sat g �tr��,irt a educatrorr'of (lat3Qrnet Irn •Mt.Y,wTe.a li•<rty�i�l ` t�1'���Tu. 'o�prwF��[TR;F-�.+ti iij�i•�d� C pudte aro a!+ainaisth atllnr+,dla.ltrtfowrng�eprnaraitne,t,s W1)t a dnet.,�,ct►Par>u g�> �tt�A.jt �'�? �;� I 11-1boiiri recruit tiaasi ag, at envy into dutyr or,dureng the t"ust year"of tenure;for fratErbg raids,cwrra eo n .ate r +� aas -' tie sJ , y o�fuxrs;prclbstiori.arid pira4s-oftroers.and.dZ At teasr' trotusoi or'refrestwer traFnr pec�Yea G ,J'S for int �porr Wianal pr3ira oriel a i more thaan one yaar of tenure. r Fs � " {J. S y �z r si '�s'.'' ; ' 'I%,' z° 3tt "Grants fix t;orrtrputertzad.Sy�anaras if atraj' port +r of thus grant:irnohres ttW!+ettaiat�stuint«11 etarntCAra4sceor fi' � _ tipigradre p of i.G[knaixg ei$zed s�stem.obit Subgrantee Avres - � , �t� �` P Ta ensure unit ad to c#+nsoegt *\Ism �1iti�iErRw , YKM.'"Yw'e\S I �dUaL/y71 /!�,_;4� :G# 1�" •: 4 -- the :rnstaapAoe ,of .n r and of data +ootkctran tYrtteat gQ days f r p ct avra[d t a �x 'w� A +� ' � xbyd�` $ wF �U 3 hags Subgrantee stunt sr:4rnrt to.CCCl.its pian.,tor cns !'O tha seoutty of rntt>lstnatu the systems F , � a R� and assuranioes111.pros dncn91, coewomtrod of the nights ai p PVW Tine f'ro ,Sia d �e� epa K°" "1( irlty!and ttrrlFiL ,�Ol ldlriOttason Crrrrn�niT;t to[jf-lnjorfpat"S x l n �t gl! x r�° -- $ To,eoorda:nate dewabprpent of the ib'ram with°atnl/.QDrflp�toW,,:ff%"Sptq'oftio.pt n Sill r,t tiC 4 lG At Of . , ercdion os data and tt,a,usI'lle of.staardaM repwtang fostnats and dafeatisr n.to ers�na<c tt>a tie efstiOl- M 4 µ pwtentuts Qf its�niorn>atit>en systems txet ties and Prov1%1, n1.aeded anacfaoa vMh,tYartrcutaf Crnrrn►rrai.GIxI;c''�4 '� _ intorrraatrtx�Systttna. Fr s7 g �w,I 1 �` ? I :1C. Tfat ,ant tarxrypcster'softwarre, trroduaad under�11, zk+is grant will be reads,astable,to EEt uas�sfe}� taiPI authorized users on,the anmanat justice aomt:nrrnrty without cast other tiratn that`dkectiy aasoraated anrat�r tlne r tranI'lsta Systems wan ba dacurrnernced"in-suffioiarnt detail to enable a oafs»ptcrseciataprocesa+!r9staif idi0t`il#e,�.�.y. i1r; ihBlfeot, t0 Oil a tl ,O�finf#�r- avid tJlMt�ta0bp offa" �t "k"M_ /n1 N,+Rw*� +'s.. Qfn� 41$� - k 2 , s,y� ',',�, �- : q * i`.�'f�,,. - pax x "Xc . '-�: -r E,. i.y, ,"h Sir#i "Y �, .' ... _ f) To prrlvrefa a11 onrnvkle caps.ot dowrpntitorn;to the appirnbie Reg,rat-,P , ,e,(unte OOCh Ragranat� ,K {� r .� . 1�. �'`z3� ^'s s ``t Ldidrrrstratar.o(.hist gffioc has Muuld this requaErrrant!and a aoanPtt±t+ !Gt SP tO�the S terns•Qevefo F, r 4 't Z I A a'ti" 'J' W;111F" ihRM'x's. ..rp. ,f f.y '^ '+x - Dcvisron, Off+oe of "Cri�ruraart Just+ca Asr ar a«. i.a�r E1.nioroa tt A1. s�tatree J �frsunatratrarr �. iloQunnentatron annp nidude but. rot be heated t4 SYstem pescrtptro_n aperatrr>S tnstruct�onr, Elser�, '� g lnstractrons. Prograe+ tWirnt+�narnca f+nstcu a�wt: orars.file desarpt {raporriotrnatsp�� r lrstas�sancf.fbw dnuts br:the syslam ard.prograrsss. 3 sjyj s ` " t { s e ' ss' yk "°;1�5� a,�ifr r w..u� .Ya :E, That w berw er possatnk-ap atnpt�rat�aes programs anti be�rrtten ie ANS Ct]BQt.�gs order titan the "'' a ", 7" --- r 11 , i'ansferrtd 'read:W. tri "aNiather autl+a(ied.,wiser: iMhcires the �da►ture tiR ter tam reaurrO.et a 11;1s11uerstrfi �' ��� �`_ txogr ?8uage ANS EQRTt3AN, ' 4 d � .' '� t4 r s f -;E 9 r { To;avad„its+Nf, to �e.maximum erAl"t wettable of is uter software atteasfy lerocEuced aartt ava►tabte , ar►ythatt.cfiwrge rens! to insurr shat rte:esfort is'+ectericied in"ttrrs mea, l.EA pubtrcat►Ons_rad 1 A,�gonat Systems 5taaiist staoutd lac consulted.” _ - 11 $t+',Ckan A%rrArx:Viotspo,Rs. Ira acc4rdar►o�r.�ar-�rh-.thecx+z�isio ,s nt. the Clean Aitr kct - tiS C St3ST;et sect:,as. ���. , �*' I 11 „. anner+deii by-P.L.9t:Gly,ami E artu:iw Order t TW.tt+e Subpraratee-agrees MITI�i cls '' not tie'made avrth -, xP._ parttes taoravicted of arrays offense uraddr t► Ctat era Aa Act. ' 1. r §r _ L,: 1” "<. . T 32,'llie of Arrptanesand,fkbwpftm Arrpl nes arxl he iropttrs p x ad-art t1 nO la ltd ~;Qr F { crit ftsstds rnurt , '� �11 #I�iaw,fa ttre,puri'oses„stated un this+gr.aat aroraM and nnstt.nat be used icc rrr>,ta e�arareritnrrt turpb' rte, RK'tOril Of icralsIR a s 3 Ct �,, . �� �_- �, �.-,"r a..;, 4 t : �f "x �u ,v.!`i- "+ter ti t.sf" c�.r't�` a'� r -..k1 JZ { 1'� �5".iu-F 3i'. i%sI'lls + r #s z rl a i s o- acza '_ _ �,, "I I.. .,`, a+.. ., x ' ,.;, ,rr. �rwFsib .�tii 11 .- , 33. Educational Support+ The Sutgrante: assure: that au orrscon shall. on the basis of sex. be excluded from participation in. be denied the benefits of.or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity funded in vehoic or in part :n accordance with this grant assrard with the exception of the qualifications set forth in Title IX.Section 901:x1 of P.L.92-318. 3k identification of Source of MawWr AN vvb6shed rnoate6ai and written reports submitted under this grant award or in conjunction with contrasts under this grant ar.•ard must be originally developed material unless otherwise specifically provided in this grant award agreement. When material not originally developed is included in a report or other puWevwd rrmte izl. the source of such material must be identified. This identification may be in the body of the report or by footnote.This provision is applicable when the material is in a verbatim or extensive paraphrase fotmaL 35. Notices. All written notices pursuant to rias grant award shall be given by addressing the same as follows and depositing the same in;he U.S,mait.postage repaid: CCG: Robert H.Lawson.Execu:ne%jectai Calitcnnia Coune.1 on Criminal justice 7171 Bowt.ng Drive Sacramento.California S1823 Subgrantee; To the Subgrantee nsmea on the face sheet hereof at the address stated therein. Project Director: To the project director named on the face sfuet hereof at the address stated therein unless written notice of any change therein has been received from the Subgrantee prior to the time said notice is to be given. in *which event. said notice shall be sent in accordance with said written changes. Nothing herein contained shall pmduda the giving of any aotiee by personal service. The address to which notice shall be trailed as set forth above to either party may be changed tri written notice given by such party in the manner set forth above. 3& Amendments. No alteration or variation of the terms of this grant award shop be valid unless made in writing and signed by CCG and the Subgrantee.and no oral m-iderstanding or agreement not incorporated herein shalt be binding on either CCCJ or the Subgrntae. — & - Rev.8/ 3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EZ OFFICIO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 15 February 3 In the Matter of Status of Clean Water Grant Application. The Board of Supervisors on May 79 1974 having authorised Mr. Victor W. Sauer, Engineer ex officio, of the Contra Costa County Sanitation District Ito. 15 to execute an application for a. Clean Water Grant with the State Eater Resources Control Board and the Environmental Protection Agency for the design and construction of a sewage collection system and related facilities for the District; and The Public Works Director having this date reported that a Step II Grant Agreement of $359,850 has been accepted by the District for the preparation of construction plans and specifications; and The Public Works Director having further reported that the estimated construction cost of the project is $6.6 million, that total Federal and State Grants will amount to about $5.2 million and a local matching share of about $1.2 million will be required for which General Obligation. Bonds have already been authorised; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the report of the Public Works Director is ACiC1i0kTLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred cagy of an order entered on the s+ninutes of said Soard of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of ccs Public Works Director Super Environmental Control affixed this 3rd day of February-, 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller Clerk Y ' D�+h� Rondaly6n Shackles M 24 W75 IOU s 4z 4M Ptac:r v ofVv�.vs ♦..�.•r: r V! Gonial Costa County, S'raiep of CcliT.^,rnio February 3, 1976 Contract with Creative Communications and Research of Berkeley, CA for Research and Evaluation of the Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project. The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; 1T IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED- that Supervisor James P. Kenny, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with CREATIVE COMMUNICATIONS AND RESEARCH of Berkeley, CA for research and evaluation. of. the Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project from January 1, 1976 to June 30, 1976 at a cost not to exceed $3990• Passed by the Board on February 3, 1976. # heraby cer:y :not tha fore-yeing is o :ru::vnd corm:"-ropy ai tut order enivredon thtt inloulas of said Board of Supervisors an :he crate afar-soid. cc: County Probation Officer Witness my hoed and the Seal or the Board of Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Ssparvisors Contractor axed this 3rd do- of February 19 76 c/o Probation Officer ,� �"? J. r�. ©LSSO�I, Clerk County Auditor-Controller L/ - County Administrator aY DePOY C cex a M. 0027d t Contra Costa County Standard form STd.isDUD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Ideari_ication. Humber 35018-316-728-2310 Department:' Probation Subject: Research and Evaluation of Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project 2. Parties. The Cotmty of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Creative Communications and Research Capacity: Consultant Address: Gini Scott, President 2837 Regent Street, Berkeley, CA 94705 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is January 1. 1976 and it terminates June 30. 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed .99F-00 S. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Pravis=ons attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and SDecial Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. a. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project Office of Criminal Justice Planning Grant 01955-2 9. Legal Authority_ . This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Section 31000 and 26227 Penal Code Section 1203.14 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA COIrMCTOR By : _ J. airman, 8 of S rvisors 'i" Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk Designate official capacity in business -� and affix corporation seal) State of California ) ss. Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKHOaLZDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) Reto=--nded by DepartmentThe person signing above for Contractora� kn +n to ime in those individual and J �/7 business capacities, personally appeared By (>' (,, 'Z� before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation v or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: Count-I Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. �.�.�.�."�"r'-.mac•,•. 19 "'Icrofilmed with board crde 1 _ li=/0eputy Countg Clerk UW-.:3. ct 945Z fp " ,uunlitied with board order ` �''.o.Mbt rr �hli=/Jeouty County Cleric F- 9. �0. '' ...mac-vv� ..arr axe, U --;=4 CL 945i3 Contra Costa County _ Standard Form PAYMM ?ROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) Humber 35018-316-728-2310 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [X] b. $ 10.00 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided hereunder. 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demaad(s) for payment. 4. Audit Excentions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. L Initials: J Contractor C ty Dept. i i i i � n C (A-4619 REV 6/75) 006250 Contra Costa Countj Standard Form GEMNERAL CONDITIONS (?urchase of Services) Number 35018-316-728-2310 1. Compliance with Lai. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State a.:d local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not 11-i ed to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions o: employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor sha2_1 keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. S. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event or such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 5. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets r°quired by this Contract, including but not Limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Inforsal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any scrams of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. S. :codifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. a b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be arended by a :mitten administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not mater;a�?j change the' Payment Provisions or the Service ?Ian. Initials: Contractor ty Dent_ 00 '-1 i r Contra Costa County Standard Form %CMIE.RAL CONDITIONS Ou."chase of Services) 35018-316-723-2310 :lumber 5. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Lasa Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term here-of, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. _ 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by,any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or ;sept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to informs all employees, agents + and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized•by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initia?s: ; Contractor vf Dept. 00952 j Contra Costa County Standard Form- GENERAL ormGE E:RAL CONDITIONS (Pu-chase of Services) Number 35018-316-728-2310 38. Nondiscram`datcry Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under :.his Contract szal1 he available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, calor, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. 'The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, fr= any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements un?ess otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum 1;-its: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease frog any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States iP.ail, postage prepaid. notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for Which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall: be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not ' limit any term of the General Conditions. 5 Initials: _ "-Contractor (COUAtv Dept. t 00253 P i r P r{C f SPECIAL CONDITIONS • Number 35018-316-728-2310 Item 20, Insurance of the General Conditions is hereby deleted. Office of Criminal Justice Planning Standard Third Party Contract Provisions, Exhibit pages), 1s hereby incorporated y reference and made a part o this agreement. r Initials: Contractor- 14Wty Dept. f �s SERVICE PLAN Number 35078-316-728-2310 Creative Communications and Research will do a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the second year of the Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project. Contractor agrees to provide the services and deliver the products specified below. SERVICES: r A. Quantitative measures will be developed to assess the project's effect by comparing the project's experimental group and the control group. These quanti- tative measures w131 also take account of any changes in the program, and data on groups of clients affected by any policy changes affecting treatment will be considered separately in analyzing experimental and control group differences. Information will be obtained to analyze and compare these groups as to: subse- quent police contacts, length of stay in juvenile hall , rate of petition filing, and other quantitative measures to be decided upon. B. In addition, qualitative and some quantitative data will be obtained on clients and parents served and on the attitudes of outside service agencies to the diversion program and philosophy. Interviews will be conducted with project staff, key probation department personnel, police departments, clients and parents, and representatives from other youth-service agencies in the service area. Also, observations will be conducted on the project's operations. PRODUCTS: A. A work plan finalizing the second year evaluation plan, submitted within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the contract. B. The collection of project, probation department, and police department out- come data on project and control group clients. C. Results of interview data. D. Reports. 1. Three quarterly progress reports prepared according to the "Instructions for Preparing Progress Report" which is attached and incorporated herein by reference, Exhibit B (4 pages). 2. Final second year evaluation report to include: a. Information regarding fourth quarter operations prepared according to "Instructions for Preparing Progress Report" (Exhibit B). b. Evaluation findings. c. An evaluation design for the projected third year of the project. d. Recommendations for project modifications based on evaluation findings. All products shall be submitted in final form. Services shall be provided at times, places, and in the manner specified by County. One unit of service for payment purposes shall be defined as one hour of. service. The maximum number of hours to be covered under this contract shall not exceed three hundred and ninety-nine (399). The hourly payment rate includes all incidental expenses incurred by the Con- tractor during the course of the Contract, including the use of equipment and supplies and electronic data processing. Initials: ,�. Contractor un4tyl D e�p_t Q�2S5 OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLP64MING STANDARD THIRD PARTY CONTRACT PROVISIONS I- C.r..al iance i zS Grant Award. Contra Costa County, hereafter referred to as S=Srantee, z_n-= he O rrtce of Criminal Justice Planning, hereafter referred to as OCJP, ezrzred into a grant award, a 1955-2 here- atter referred = as "grant award." Said grant award is incorporated in the within Agrezr-e-n- It is expressly understood and agreed that Subgrantee will retain ul=:ra:e control and responsibility for the grant award project and the Contracz..r agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of said grant award applicable to Subgrantee in the conduct of the project. 2. Compliance with Fiscal Requirements. The Contractor agrees to perform under this Agreement in accordance with all terms and conditions contained in the OCJP Fiscal Affairs Manual and the financial guidelines prescribed by the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (hereafter referred to as. LEAA) -and the OCJP. 3. Assignment or Subcontracting. No performance of this Agreement or any portion thereo may be assigned or subcontracted by the Contractor without the 6ipress written consent of Subgrantee and any attempt by the Contractor to assign or - subcontract any performance of the teras of this Agreement without the express written consent of Subgrantee shall be- nulI and void and shall constitute a breach of this Agreement. Whenever the Contractor is authorized to subcontract or assign, he will include all the teras of this Agreement in each such subcon- tract or assignment. 4. Assurance of Compliance with Civil Rights Laws. The Contractor hereby assures that it will comply with Title V1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to regulations -of the Department of Justice _ and the LEAH issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex, or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this Agreement or under any project, program, or activity supported by this Agreement. The Contractor will comply with Justice Department Equal Employment Regulations in federally-assisted programs (28 CFR Part 42, - Subpart D) to the end that employment discrimination in such programs on the grounds of race, color, creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The Contractor recognizes the right of the United States to seek judicial enforcement of the foregoing covenants against discrimination. If this Agreement provides for payment to the Contractor in* excess of $10,000, the Contractor shall comply with Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal E cloyment Opportunity," as supplemented. The Contractor shall be required to have an affirmative action plan hirS declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and which specifies goais and target dates to assure the implementation of equal employment. 5. Maintenance and Inspection of Contractual Records_ The Contractor agrees that the Su grantee, the 0 i', t e LEAA, t e Con.ptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe any directly pertinent books, documents, papers and records of the Contractor, involving transactions relating . to this Agreement. Such material must be kept and maintained for a period of three years after termination of the grant award or until an audit is completed by OCJP and LEAA and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, whichever is sooner. The Contractor agrees to keep and maintain all records required by the Fiscal Affairs Manual, the financial guidelines prescribed by LEAA, and any other records that may be required by other laws or- regulations of Federal , state or local government units. .00166: r�.� .- •- _ -�-L:✓C X14 -W-, 1V p MilalT A " 6. Ccoyrights and Rights in Data. Where activities supported.by this Agreement arccuce original computer programs, writing, sound recordings, pictorial re- p.-ociuctions, drawings or other graphical representation and works of any s;m1lar nature (the terra computer programs includes executable computer programs and supportir.S data in any form) , the OCJP, the LEAA, and Subgrantee reserve the right to use, duplicate and disclose, in whole or in part, in any manner for, any purpose wh__sozver, and to authorize others to do so. If the material is subject to copyright, the Subgrantee reserves the right to copyright such and the Contractor agrees not to copyright such material. if the material is copyrighted, the OCJA and the LEAA reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and. irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use such materials, in the whole or in part, and to authorize others to do so. 7. Publications. Both the OCJP and the Subgrantee reserve the right to require the Contractor not to publish, and the Contractor thereupon shall refrain from publishing original books, manuals, films or other copyrightable material produced by activities supported by this Agreement, whether copyrighted or not, that may be designated by the OCJP or the Subgrantee. Such right shall be exercised by addressing written notice to that effect to the Contractor. Before publishing any materials produced by activities supported by this Agreement, the Contractor shall notify Subgrantee and OCJP sixty days in advance of any such publication. If the Subgrantee and OCJP fail to exercise the right to prohibit publication as set forth above within sixty days of the receipt of the notice of intent to publish, the Contractor may publish said material. The Contractor shall furnish twenty copies of the materials so published to Subgrantee and OCJP. Any such publication by the Contractor shall include on the title page the following standard disclaimer: "The preparation of these materials was financially aided through a Federal grant from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Office of Criminal Justice Planning under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended. The opinions, findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration or the Office of Criminai Justice Planning." "OCJP reserves a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish and use these materials, and to authorize others to do so." S. Patents. if any discovery or invention arises or is developed in the course of or as a result of work perfamed under this agreement, the Contractor shall refer the discovery or invention to Subgrantee and OCJP. The Contractor hereby agrees that determinations of rights to inventions or discoveries made under this Agreement shall be made by LEAA, or its duly authorized representativemiho shall have the sole and exclusive pourers to determine whether or not and where a patent application should be filed and to determine the disposition of all rights in such inventions or discoveries. including title to and license rights under any patent application or patent which may issue thereon. The determination of LEA.A, or its duly authorized representative, shall be accepted as final. The Contractor agrees and otherAise recognizes that LEAH, OCJP, and Subgrantee shall acquire at least an irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to practice and have practiced throughout the world for governmental purposes any invention made in the course of or under this Agreement. 9. Contractor Work Hours and Safety Standards. If this Agreement provides for payment in excess o 52,500 52,000 FoF construction contracts) and involves the employment of mechanics or laborers, the Contractor agrees: a} That each mechanic or laborer will have wages computed on the basis of a standard work day of eight hours and a standard work week of forty hours. Work in excess of the standard work week or day is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at the rate of not less than one-half times the basic rate of pay for all hours workec in excess of eight hours in any calendar day or forty hours in the work week; b) That no laborer or mechanic shall be required to work in surroundings or under ' working conditions which are unsanitary, .hazardous or dangerous to his health and safety as determined under construction safety and health standards promulgated by the Secretary of Labor by rzgsla:ion (29 CFR 13-:.3). These requirements co not 4 2 00" EXH181T A . apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. 10_ Clean Air Act_ it this Agreement provides for payment in excess of $100,000, the Contractor agrees to comply with ail applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act of 1970. Violations shalt be reported to CUP and the regional office of the Environmental Protection Agency. I1. Public Availability of Information. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Sections 6250—through 6260 of the Government Code of the-State of California and the LEAA Guide for Comprehensive Law Enforcement Planning and Action Grants relating to the avai labi I ity to the pubiso enti iable records or ocher documents that are partinent•to the receipt or expenditure of LEAH funds. 12. Security and Privacy. (a) The Contractor agrees that, except as provided by federal law other than the Crime Control Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. Sections 3701 et M.), none of its officers or employees shall use or reveal any research or statistical information furnished by any person and identifiable to any specific private person for any purpose other than the purpose for which it was obtained. Copies of such information shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any action, suit, or other judicial or administrative proceedings. (b) Criminal history information: (1) The term "criminal history information" includes records and . related data, compiled by law enforcement agencies for purposes of identifying criminal offenders and alleged offenders and maintaining as to such persons summaries of arrest, the nature and disposition of criminal charges, sentencing, confinement, rehabilitation and release. (2) If the Contractor utilizes "criminal history information," the Contractor shall comply with the following: Ali criminal history information collected, stored, or disseminated shall contain, to the maximun. extent feasible, dispositions as well as arrest data where arrest data is included therein. The coIIection, storage, and dissemination of such information shall take place under procedures reasonably designed to insure that all such information is kept current therein; the Contractor shall assure that the security and privacy of all information is adequately provided for and such information shall only be used for law'en- forcement and criminal justice and other lawful purposes. In addition, an individual who believes that criminal history information concerning him contained in an automated system is inaccurate, in- complete, or maintained in violation of the Crime Control Act of 1973, shalt , upon satisfactory verification of his identity, be entitled to review such information to obtain a copy of it for the purpose: of challenge or correction. (c) Any person violating the Security and Privacy provisions of this Contract or of the Crime Control Act o 9 3 L42 U.S.C. Section 3771(c)j or any rule, regulations, or order issued thereunder, shall be fined not to exceed $100000 in addition to any other penalty imposed by law. (d) The contractor assures that the foregoing provisions of the Security and Privacy clause shall be incorporated into all of its subcontracts. 3 00? �E I 11 EXHIBIT A 1 13. " el nate Competition. All -procurement transactions regardless of whether notiatea or advertised and without regard to dollar value shall be conducted is a manner so as to provide maximum open and free cocapetition. The grantee .:a:sld be aie:t to orSanizationai conflicts of interest or no..nc empetitive practices amwg contractors which may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade_ Contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work and/or RFPs for a proposed procurement shall be excluded fr bidding or submitting a proposai to ccxnpete for the award of such procurement." ' n. ,s z ..=. r , �. a:# Y i l �1 X1.J f " .. ., 1. �. _ t .: - .s ., - ., 1. 7, d '.` .-. - - pr ' . x i ) 5 f ', , , _. ,. -. t^ _ - __ h Y K� r .., I l 4 Y � F x , :, .. -I:i ,, 4 o02Sg1 r 11 ' _ _� . _ b f I C 1WSTRGC^_TO`:S FOR PREPARING PROGRESS REPORT EXHIBIT B F,:r and three (3) co:.ies of this Report and any attach.r._nts to the Cr.:_._nal Just-dice cancv of Contra Costa County. (Five (51 conies of the final repo== a_a _eauired.) Do not send copies to the State Office of Cri mi- i justice Planning (_formerly CCCJ) . Use 8-1/2" x 11" paper only. A. s XCE SHEET 1. Anolicant: Enter the name and address of the applicant. Include the project director with his contact phone number. 2. OCJP I and Con-act aw: Enter OCJP proposal number and contract number. 3. Funding Year: Check appropriate year of funding. 4. Report For: Check appropriate box =or kind of report_ 5. Period Covered by Report: Indicate beginning and ending dates of the quarter, or or the project if the report is final. 6. Date of Report: Enter date of completion of report. 7. Prepared By and Title: Indicate name and title (relationship to project . B. GENERAL INSTRUCTIO S 1. Progress reports should be cumulative; i.e. , describe progress not only for the covered quarter but also from the beginning of the project. Prior quarter(s) activities can be presented in summary form. References to earlier progress -reports should include page numbers. Statistical data, tables, graphs, etc. , should cover the current and prior quarters besides including a cumulative total. 2. The first three quarterly progress reports are due in the Criminal Justice Agency office by the 10th day following the close of the quarter. The final progress report should cover both foeirth quarter activities and the entire grant period, including the evaluation. Th s report is due wi h.;,.n 60 days after the end of the grant period. The above instructions cover a tvpical 12-month grant period. if the grant is extended, more reports may -be required. For example, a 15-month grant period would require 4 quarterly reports plus a final report which included the fifth quarter. 3. No fixed format is required. Pro;acts are expected to present activities and fi^dings in su€ficlert detail to provide CJA and OCJP reviewers a clear idea of accomolisbments to date, problems encountered, and changes made in the approved project if any. The following section contains guidelines to be observed and areas to cover in preparing the reports. Each area should be covered, although the detail and relevance naay vary according to project. Projects are encouraged to add t ieir judgments and evidence in any area not covered by the guidelines. {, {�t� 4. Assistance in the interpretation of these instructions and OU ti 0 guidelines is available from the Criminal Justice Agency. S, ?rogress reports are intended to be presentations of the conduct of the proiects as approved by CJA and OCJP and as set forth in the grant aaa=d. Some program and fiscal changes require prior OCJP approve. (See Fiscal Affairs Manual or consult CJA staff.) If prior ap=roval is required, the progress report should clearly indicate whethe-- or not the project has obtained it from OCJP. C. GUIDELINES 1. Objectives: List each project objective_ If project experience as det ailed in the progress report) dictates that the originally approved objectives be reformulated either for reasons of clarity or program revision, the report should clearly set forth the differences between original and reformulated objectives and the reasons for the changes. 2. Value Assumptions: Give the value assumptions underlying the listed objectives and indicate the source, such as agency exper- ience, hypotheses, or other evidence. For example, crime-specific burglary programs are often based upon assumptions about who commits such crimes, when., and how they do it. The progress report should indicate changes, if any, in such assumptions. 3. Activities: Describe activities and accomplishments by objective. Summarize the activities of prior quarter(s) . Clearly set forth workload and performance data (e.g. , meetings attended, people - trained, clients served, investigations conducted, etc.) . Indi- cate deviations from originally approved work schedule and types of activities and methods. Specify reasons for such changes. Describe nature and extent of any contacts with other agencies and groups,- public and private, including services rendered and received. 4. Problems: Set forth problems encountered during quarter such as delays in staffing and other tasks, cash flow blockages, discovery that original objectives are not achievable or that proposed activities are -iota seen as ineffective. Discuss steps taken to solve the problem and expected impact on successful completion of the total project. Are there actions that CJA or OCJP can take to facilitate solution? (Do not wait •.zztil a progress report is due to report problems that need inamediat-e CJA or OCJP attantion.) S. Evaluation: Describe the current status of the project's evalua- tion gn. (If he design was finalized during tete quarter, it should be presented in detail.) Parzicular attention should be given to the following elements: a) Evaluation criteria - For each objective described previously in the report, describe the data that will be used to measure achievement of the objective. Why was such data chosen as a measure of el ectiveness? How will it show achievement of an objective? b) Method - ghat method has the project chosen to measure effec- tiveness (i.e. , achievement of an objective)? Is there a control group? Was randomization used in planning activities (e.g. , in assigning clients to various types of treatment or in -2- H . ...,.,r;;....., ,'.,. .-... ..-,,,..i? • ray;.. e choosing areas for concentrated burglary suppression)? Describe in detail such control groups and procedures. If there are none, to what will the project compare its results? How dete_-_-a:,_ne if results are due to project activities or some extraneous unfno-mm. factor (s)? c) Data collection system - Describe system used to collect data required for evaluation. what fortes are used? (Attach copies. ) Ey whom? Are there controls for accuracy? How is data routed throughout the project and agency? d) Use of data --Are there feedback mechani§ris-built into agency operations that permit ongoing utilization of project results for decision making? Has agency determined its regui.remeiits for evaluative data? Describe. Is such data being collected? Will project data satisfy CJA and OCJP needs? e) Other information and data - What other information and data are being collected by project in addition to data used as formal evaluation criteria? Is a history being kept of -project activities and decisions, formal and informal? Are unintended effects recorded? (Such information will provide a contextual background for the evaluation which may help relate achievement of objectives to project activities.) - •f) Describe findings to date. How were conclusions arrived at? Do the findings tend to support or reject original approaches of the project? Have project activities beer. changed as a result of the f—indings? Do the findings carry implications for current agency policies and practices? If so, describe_ 6. Continuation: Describe efforts to ensure continuation of project a -ter Fe eral funds are gone. Will the agency reorganize its budget and/or staff to facilitate continuation? What is the status of other fur-ding such as city or county? 7_ Anticivated act- :.eve.ments in the next quarte: Describe activiti3s planned for the next quarte_. Discuss any anticipated problems and delays and their impact on overall project time schedule. 8. Project sLa€fir_g: Have all positions been €illad? At approved rates? If not, which positions remain vacant and why? Relate vacancies and changes in staffing patterns to effectiveness of project activities. Attach: a^ organization cc►,rt showing project staffing pastern and its place within the agency. 9. Project policies: Describe program policies both formal and informal; e.g. , criteria for selection of clients and policies governing decisions at various points in the process of project. Ir policies are written, attach copies- 10. opies.10. Equipment: a) Ordered - Submit published specificatiors List bids received Identify manufacturer Expected delivery date � � Expected date of operation • � f r Discuss any delays in terns of approved project time schedule - and wo-k plans. b) Received - Ieztify each item. 311. Fiscal: Submit copies of latest 201 forms.* Discuss changes in amounts, types of expense, and rates. Justify in terms of approved project_ Some changes require OCJP approval. Identify these and indicate if approval has been obtained. Is required match being made? Estimate expenditures by category through end of the grant. will there be unexpended funds? If so, iclerntify and discuss in terms of fulfilling project objectives. 12. Final reports: If this is a final progress and evaluation report (i.e. , one covering the entire project) , particular attention should be paid to organization of the report. Since this report includes the final project evaluation, a wider audience can be anticipated. Use appendices for special reports or minor aspects of the project: 13. Special Requirements: a) Security and Privacy - Describe the status of procedures initiated to assure compliance with the Security and Privacy Clause of the Crime Control Act of 1973 (42 USC, Section 3771) where applicable. b) Equal Employment Program - Describe the status of the equal employment program in terms of compliance with the LEA.zL guidelines (28,CFR, Sections 42,301 et. seq.) where applicable. 14. Requested Revisions (if any) : a) Programmatic 1) Nature of the requested revision 2) Justification for the requested revision b) Budgetary (See Section 1540 of the Fiscal Affairs Manual) 1) Nature of the requested revsion (Attach OCJP Porn No. 223 - Budget Revision Request_) 2) Justification for the requested revision i *201 forms are to be submitted monthly to the Criminal Justice Agency no later than the 10th day of the month. Do not send 201 forces to ocap in Sacramento. -4- 00"93 C _ In The Board or Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Febru= 3 . 19. 76 In the Matter of Approval of Contract with Judith David, PhD. for Probation Staff Training The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Judith David, PhD. for staff . training in Crisis Intervention from February 20, 1976 to April 30, 1976, at a cost not to exceed $384. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Or i g: Probation Dee cc: County ProSatlon pp=10?1'icer Witness my hand and the Sea! of the Board of Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this arc€ day of February . 19 7 c/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller ' �/ County Administrator Deputy Clerk H 24 12f74 - 154A P�.axine M. file f _d JHB 002%094 'SIAMNU .,K (Purchase or special Services) 1. CmLn _ct leer.tification. tion 351,31-308-2310 Deparent: Probation cUb,J=ct= Sr3`= Train.:;:: in Crisis Intervention 2. ?ar-:s. The Cc=ty of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, =--:. follyftir._ .=.::et Contractor ritually agree and pronise as follows: _: :actor: „ • =n David, PhD. _z:acity: _s::l_ant :dress: _-_ - 33th Street, Richmond, CA 94805 3. -ern. The effect: :_ _ate of this Contract is February 2R, 1976 and it terminates A,nril 31, 1976 unless sooner terminated as providMerein. A. ierniration. This Czctract may be terminated by the County, at :`s sole discretion, upon rive-day advance writ:en notice thereof to the Contractor. Payment Limit_. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 384.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: FEE RATE: $ 8.00 per service unit: (X) hour; or � session, as defined below; or ) calendar (insert: day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of 48 service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specie i2e instruction, and training in Crisis Intervention for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner requirea 6y- County, inc u ing the prevision of any related materials and supplies. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and snail not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association_ a. Indemnification. ' Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its o`ricers, agents, and employees fm-n all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 13. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the folIowing legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR 3 '2;g!Z Kenny g y� y r •`t,r.. ,C.:t-sem+- f ./iC.'.�..._.,r• lGi � 4...an, oar of aper i cors FEB 3 1976 I Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk esignate Official capacity) ci' ! 3y , Deputy Recom a ded by Departme 3y d • (rcrm approved by County Counsel) Maonlmed with iioaa ori In tete Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California February 3 , 19;76 In the Matter of Approval of Contract with Judith David, Ph.D. for Training Staff of the Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Judith David, Ph.D. for training staff of the Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project from February 1, 1976 to June 30, 1976 at a cost not to exceed $1,200. PASSED by the Board on Februarq 3, 1976. f 1 hereby certify thot the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote oforesoid. Orifi: Probation Department cc: County Probation Officer Wdnm r"Y hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 3rd day of February 19 76 C/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller * ,i County Administrator Deputy Clerk " " 24 121'4 • 154U Maxine M. NeuYtld r JHB 00296 3 STAMARD COIiTRACT (-Purctlase of Specia ervices) 1. Contra-*, Tdenti ication. ;:;-..t=r 35iJ32-31E-723-2310 Departrmart: Probation _:abject: Staff Training for Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project 2. Parties. The County o-' Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, _-= _he follc:s;r:= n_-ea Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: ,:n tractor: Judith David, PhD. rapacity: Consultant Address: 643 - 38th Street, Richmond, CA 94805 3. Term. The effecti:; ____ of this Contract is February 1 1976 and it terminates June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided erein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon*i five-day advance written notice thereof to the Cont'actor. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed 1 ,200.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: FEE RATE: $ 15.00 per service unit: (x) hour; or ( ) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert: day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of 80 service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obli ations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction, and training in Family Crisis Counseling for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by Lounty, inc u ing the provision of any related materials and supplies. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the.operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. . 10. Legal AuthorityThis Contract is entered into under and subject to the following lega authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Siqnatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By P. Kenny a r,an, Board ot Supervi%ps,FEB 3 1976 - - tl Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk (Designate official capacity By If �� Deputy Recommended by Depar . nt s i By (r J t G - '""Z-`�- (Form approved by County Counsel) 0012- 97 Microfilmed with Ir c:rd order 7- o- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia February 3 1976 In the/Matter of Executive Session. At 9:45 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session with the County Counsel to consider litigation matters within the attorney-client relationship. At 10:30 a.m. the Board reconvened in its Chambers and proceeded with its regular agenda. This is a MATTER of RECORD. I hereby that the foregain Is a true and aorred a Matter of Record oopy of�g�Q entered on the minutes of sold Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid. Witneu my hand and the Seof of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 3rd dav of February . 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk f. `� Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufe d H 24 005 lOM i I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Agreement for Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport. The Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall of Redwood City, California to conduct a Master Plan Study for the development of Buchanan Field Airport, said study to be financed with a $30,000 planning grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (accepted by the Board on November 18, 1975) and with $15,000 in matching county funds. PASSED by the Hoard on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the fonvoinp k a true and carred copy of an ander entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the dale aforesaid. cc; Airport Manager Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Contractor Federal Aviation al�xed this _�z d_—� of February , 19 76 Administration Public Works Director .,, I R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor- rg� Deputy Clerk Controller Maxine M. rte eld County Administrator Director of Planning H 24 8,/75 IOU t . 1 t OCONSULTOG SERVICES AG�%!J� 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. a Public Agency: Contra Costa County (b) Consultantfs Name and Address: Daniel Hann Johnson & Mendenhall 611 Veterans Boulevard, Redwood City, 94063 (c) Effective Date: (d) Project Name, Number & Location: Master Plan for Buchanan Field Airport. "Jo s`lS.i' Concord, CA (e) Payment Limit: $41,000 2. SIGNATURES. These signatures attest the parties$ agreement hereto: CONSULTANT Ddss to official capacity in business STATE OF CALTFDRNIA ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACX'OidI.:DGMENT (CC 6 3190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before no today and acknowledged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within-instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolaU=�pt�.,i.#,s„Bp. rs. i OFF.VAL SEAL Data: EJ FNSWt ? CA:IC0.1041A �.f,SL crFxE its (Seal) f 1.?.. • 1.:.:.C:) CO::CiTY Notary Public L"}; G=.__:r E;,:;e:: :E::: L:r 3, 1977 PUBLIC AGENCY FORK APPROVED: Victor W Sauer John B. Clausen, County Counsel Public rks Director By-, Deputy By: .��' , Deputy. 3. PARTIES. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: #. AGRFT. Public Agency hereby hires Consultant and Consultant hereby agrees to perform professional services as hereinafter described in Paragraph 5, Scope of Services. The Planning Grant Program Application for a Master Plan for Buchanan Field Airport dated October'l. 1975 (as submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration), hereinafter called "Application" and attached hereto, is by this reference incorporated herein as if set forth in full. 5. SODPE OF SERVICES. Consultant will pez-.Iora all services set forth in the Application, Part IV. Program barrative for the Preparation of an Airport Master Plan (consisting of 21 pages). except for those services specifically stated to be the obligation of Public Agency. Public Agency will assist Consultant Lith Element 13 of said Part IV by furnishing estimates of proposed unit development costs. No changes to the scope of work as described herein shall be made without the prior written approval of the Public Agency. 6. I2JSURANCr. The Consultant shall. at no expense to Public Agency, 'furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250.000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. IND-_."'-INIFICATION. The Consultant shall defend, save, indemnify, and hold harmless Public Agency and its offioers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder. 8. INTEGRA7I0N. The parties hereto agree and understand that this Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties and that no other written or oral representations outside this writing are of any effect. 9. SUB-CQNTP.ACM- M. The parties agree to the designation of Addison J. Parry. President of A. J. Parry Associates, Inc., as Project Director, and to the sub-contracting for services with said fl= in connection with providing the services described in the Application. ATTACHMENT: _ .0croh.,11s.... ./Ith board �y* Planning Grant Programa Application 0030 (Z PUNY GRANT P•MWYW APPLICATEON 1 { ].F ' XAMER PLO FOR BUCHANAN FIM AIRPORT Cam7ft. Cam COMM a fl,lot t k" x . t � r � _ a r l x" W-01 WITTY I. 1 k � f Y x � t � q f 5 f t OWNSMT spot ivya r October 1, 1975 VAST, 00301 t 4 C 1 n I- statek o'.+.yiww• fd..a.i.n. {1ENAitTa.E�1T Of TR Oi 4 FOR FERE ASSISTANCE 75061690 �Af ( ONON ( NGOHSTRUGTION . OGRAMS) z. Appt.ce..t•:Ap.�..cot:on Ka_ PART I ` 1. Appt:cont is*—F.ie•al G.enter 9 sncr Contra Costa County. Califosnin t=ant of Transportation Depa D pett~nt Division p,pan:sot:onol Unit Public works Department an Administration rt Diva don Federal Avian Susst Add.sss••.P.O.Bes StrBtiori.Bti3.1d3ng ffics 6th or. A�rd Aa.w'"'•" oil Hartinez. Contra Costa County Airpo ct county San F.anc&sco Distri City stweet Aaa.e•+- p.o.$e"` ' 94553 California 831 Mitten Road zip teas Zip Com, Stets Stp1e 94010 City Burlin a iforn 5. t)escw:pti+e Ke..e ai tf.s pwotect Master Planfor Bucbanan " -eld Airport 7. fsde+ol fue4:.►9 Rsgwsted 6. Fa...) cotolog Na. C 30,000 20.103 .i $. c.oat.e Tree city* ----._-_.-_-._..tants.(Specify} ��. State. --^" �oontY.----~ 4. Type of Applicarion of Rsq..sst x Kew.Geoet.. ----- C°"`ato✓wwo+t s�trN 0"M changes(SPsc:iy) r' l 10.Type al Assistonco Olt.,{SVOCOr} Grant--------'~ "'t ' 13,Length of Pro"pec" trsctly Betteuting ha•w ihs Peopee" l months pa}tulot'wtrw►f)' R'laelve (123 i ' 300,000 la asy:..t:.ya fame lz.G,oety.ess:orwl DisM+e"r�c�.�,,1 Seventh /1 r +j popCleorge Miller o. IS.Oe"s of Appticaion b' October 1, 1975 owe iwet:ei ttte ds.o in th:s oppfico":on ers U..s one cprscf,o,a that bs w".tl camel y, I&The oppliconw eeAii:es thm to shw is" t`* with the etteehea osswewces R ite twiep1tooe Kwnbsr IIT*drtos.t }I�LYpO�Ct manager nRcw coot Kuascp __,_ �y-�r93n R. Scott l of I►uthw:teed Re'p'eswn"oris �,,,,,,_„- 415 685-0722 Sigratve ,'"�/ fop fslewot Ut.s taeir Page FAQ,,Foee.5100-101 ts-Tsp sUPf±RswEs i•AA FORM 39w,%w,rD w2D.t t 000 INSTRUCTIONS PART i of grantee on the"Other"line. Examples of other types of grantees are council of governments, interstate organirr, T., ;orm shall be used for all Federal assistance except for tions,or special units. (a) construction. land acquisitor or land development Item 9—Check the type of application or request- If the projects and (b) single purpose one-tune assistance requests "Other Change"x block is checked, specify the type of of less than S10. 00 which do-not require a clearinghousechange- The definitions for terms used.in Item 9 are as review.an environmental impact statement.or rek wion of follows persons, businesses or farms.This form shall be used also to a• New grant — an action which is being submitted by request supplemental,assistance. to- propose changes or amendments, and to request continuation or.refur loin fair the applicant for the i"ast tiencontinuation approved grants originally submitted on this form. - b_ Continuation grant — an action that pertains to the Submit the original and two copies of the forms. If an item continuation of a multi-year grant (e.g., the second cannot be answered or does not appear to be related or year award for a project which will extend over five relevant to the assistance required. write"NA"' for not ap- � Years)- plicabte. When a request is made for supplemental assis- a Supplemental grant — an action which pertains to an tance.amendments or changes to an approved grant,submit increase in the amount of the Federal contribution only those pages which are appropriate. for the sante period. _ Item 1—Enter the State clearinghouse identifier. This is d:Changes in the existing grant— Specify one or more the code or number assigned by the clearinghouse to appli- of the following: cations requiring State clearinghouse coordination for pro- (1) increase in duration=- a request to extend the grams listed in Attachment D. Office of Management and grant period Budget Circular No.A-95. (2) Decrease in duration -- a request to reduce the Item 2—Enter the applicant's application number or other grant period- identifier. eriodidentifier. if a preapplication was submitted, show also the number that appeared on the preapplication if different (3) Decrease in amount request to decrease the than the application number. amount of the Federal contt ribution. Item 3—Enter the name of the Federal grantor agency.the Item 10—Check the type of assistance requested. if the n- a of the primary organizational unit to which the appli- assistance involves more than one type,check two or more c. _n is addressed. the name of the administrative office blocks and explain in Part IV--Program Narrative. having direct operational responsibility for managing the Item 11—Enter the number of persons directly benefiting grant program, and the complete address of the Federal from this projecL For example,if the project is for a neigh- grantor agency. borhood health center, enter the estimated number of resi- Item 4—Enter the name of the applicant.the name of the dents in the neighborhood that will use the center. r primary organizational unit which will undertake the grant Item 12 supported activity, and the complete address of the appli- a. Enter the congressional district in which the applicant cant. is located- Item ocatedhem 5— Enter the descriptive name of this,project. b. Enter the congressional district(s) in which most of Item 6--Enter the appropriate catalog number as dawn in the actual work on the project will be accomplished. the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. If the assis If the work wall be accomplished city-wide or State- Lance will pertain to more than one catalog number. Leave wide" covering several congressional districts, write • this space blank and list the catalog numbers under Part ttl, -city-wide*or-State-wide". m Section A. Ite13—Enter the number of months that will be needed to complete the project after Federal funds are made avail. item 7—Enter the amount that is requested from the Fed- able. eral Government in this application. This amount should agree with the total amount shown in Part [it.Section A. Item 14—Enter the approximate date the project is ex- Line 5 of Column (e). For revisions. changes, or amend. pect1e'd to begin. ments. show only the amount of the increase or decrease. hem 15—Enter the date this application is submitted. Item 8—Check one grantee type. If the grantee is other Item 16—Complete the certification before-submitting the than a State, county, or city government,skcify the type report a fJ1.7i Ift3 ''OFPART,+tEN7 OF T�,s;lf'ORT�lltat- f EWAL AV ttllOrt tU"1"117RA710N 1) 1 PART II uN:• ,.:,.�:-,... ,N. PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION i Item 1. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Governing Body regional, or other priority rating? Priority Rating Yes X No Item 2. Does this assistance request require State, or local Name of Agency or advisory, educational or health clearances? Board Yes Z No (Attach Documentation) ! Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse (Attach Comments) review in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? Cotaats Attached Yes No Item 4. Does this assistance request require State, local, Name of Approving Agency regional or other planning approval? Date I Yes___X___N0 ''•m 5. the proposed project covered by an approved compre- Check one: State (_ I pensive plan? Local E j Regional ('A Yes No Location of Plan Begionil Airport System Study Item 6. Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Name of Federal Installation installation? Yes Z No Federal Population benefiting from Project Item 7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or Name of Federal Installation installation? Location of Federal Land Yes % No Percent of Project Item 8. Will the assistance requested hove an impact or effect See instructions for additional information to be on the environment? provided. Yes No Item 9. Number of: Wall the assistance requested cause the displacement Individuals 1 of individuals, families, businesses, or farms? Families Businesses i Yes _No. Forms • r, 10. is there other related assistance on this project previous. See instructions for additional information to be pending, or anticipated? provided. Yes-No FAA Form 5100-101 t6-731 SUPERSEOES FAA FORM 5110-1 AND 5920-t Page 00` 4 f t, 1` 1 INSTRUCTIONS PART It scope of the plan. Give the location where the approved plan is available for examination and state whether this Negative answers will riot require an explanation unless the project is in conformance with the plan. Federal agency requests more nntoamatwn at a later date. Item 6—Shaw the population residing or working on the Provide supplementary data for all "Yes answers in the Federal installation who will benefit from this projem space provided in accordance with the following instruc. tions: Imn 7—Show the percentage of the project work that will Item 1—Provide the name of the governing body establish,- be conducted on federally-owned or leased land. Give the ing the priority system and the priority rating assigned to name of the Federal installation and its location. this project. Item 8—Describe briefly the possible beneficial and harm- Item 2—Prtwide the name of the agency or board which ful impact on the environment of the proposed project. If issued the clearance and attach the documentation of status an adverse environmental impact is anticipated, explain or approval. what action will be taken to minimize the impact. Federal Comments for the appli- agencies will provide separate instructions if additional data Item 3—Attach the clearinghouseis needed. cation in accordance with the instructions contained in Of- fice of Management and Budget Circular No.A•95.If corn- Item 9—State the number of individuals, families, busi- ments were submitted previously %vial a preapplication,do news. or farms this project will displace. Federal agencies not submit there again but any additional comments re- will provide separate instructions if additional data is ceived from the clearinghouse should be submitted with needed. this application. Item 10—Show the Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Item 4—Furnish the name of the approving agency and the number, the program name, the type of assistance,the sta- approval date. tus and the amount of each project where there is related Item 5—Show whether the approved comprehensive plan previous. pending or anticipated assistance. Use additional is State, local or regional.or it none of these. explain the sheets,it needed. 00 amu..:. .. ...-.-. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California 1��v . 19 79i In the Board of Supervisors of - Contra Costa County, State of California - 14av 20_ , 19 Z5— in the Matter of " 1 Master Plan Study, Buchanan Field, Concord-. - - f The Public Works Director having reported that the 2968 Piaster Plan Study, upon which the Airport Layout Plan for Buchanan Field is based, requires updating and -that the Public Works Department is investigating the possibility of obtaining Federal matching funds under the Planning Grant Program of the Federal Aviation Administration for this project; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to submit a project review request form (CA-189) to the Association of Bay Area Governments and the State Clearing House, as required, preparatory to submitting a Federal Grant Application. PASSED by the Board on May 20, 1975_- ! hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. i cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Airport Manager Supervisors County Administrator of fixed this 20th day of May 19 J. R. OLSSON; Clerk $Y 7' 7-�-�, Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 's.a' filldred O. Ballard ' { w[ ca PUBLIC WORKS MrARTM VICa0h Ewu .► wPww- Dwtt7� Ot Fool•..YgW+Gt .moo s.. -LINE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY $ "' c«u. aerur• ►u.►c.+ww' o,wctrow �, [,swrLow .rr •t.00nt,�DMr.7.a7O+r .YILON ptIY1R•/tOOD `DN.. R.O. ppp�TGH M4R7�NEL CJ►LFOhNA L4D]� »f 4trCtlw Dwwt ptrYrts.Y1&%rt..ALMD 0t04vfW 644RK L, ctERlttT tttt�ror[ us000 ot►urr-www Jamoe 10, 19?5 RECEIVED A"I 1! 1975 Association of Bay Arca Govae3r =xwtx " Hotel G'la.-exao�ot ' Txrkeley. California 947 Att entjca: Cl ea rimghouse Review Gaatlamen: Enclosed is Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors! R.-solution dated May 20. 1975 togetbsr with Forst CL 269, Project i pbviev }?equest, for the preparation of an Airport Master Plan for Buc�•3n:n Field Airport, Concord, Cnliiornia. A prvll=Lnary outline of the proposed study and a copy of the current Airport layout Plan ,for Buch== Fleld are also enclosed. Thaw documents are being hailed concurrently to the State Clear mg House for preapplication review preparatory to our roquesting funds under the FAAis Planning Grant Program for Airports. Tour expeditious roview of the enclosed documents s7.1 be xvpreciated. Perp truly yours, Victor W. Sauer • PabUc Works Dissector - t Marvin E. Scott Airport Hanage: Ii£Sscp3 Eac. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Resolution Form CIL 189 Buchanan Field airport layout Plan cc County Administrator bcc A=old Thogpson Associates i 00307 • Grant File No.: 34-75 Exec. Board: 8/21/75 ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GMMMMM RECEIVED I-30r affIVE BOARD REPORT' pU G 2 g 1975 GRANT APPLICATION St MARY AND RFIDMEMT10N SFO PRa7= IDEmIFICATION _ APPLICANT: County of Contra Costa PROGMI: Airport Planning Grant Program Federal Aviation ministration, Department of Transportation pRO,JBCr: Ahster Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport RECEIVED: June 11, 1475 COSTS: Fzmcts $15 Total $45,000; 0 0; Grant Request $30,000 I PROJMT DESCRIPTION . The County is requesting Federal assistance to prepare five-, ten-, and 20-year t plans for development of Buchanan Field Airport near Concord. .The study will include aviation demand forecasting, capacity analyses, a determination of facility requirements, an environmental assessment, and preparation of land use, access and financial plans for this general aviation airport. STAFF mA'IENT AM REO P-ENMATION In 1973 the County commenced a three-phased study to determine County-wide aviation requirements and to conduct site selection studies for possible new general aviation facilities. Although suggesting that it vmuld not be feasible to increase significant] the nmway capacity at Antioch Airport and Buchanan Field, the phase I report completed in January 1975 calls for further improvements at Buchanan Field to provide more aircraft parking and storage space. In addition the report suggested that two other County sites be selected for future airport development. The Phase II report evaluating potential general aviation airports in the County was published in July 1975 Potential sites at Oakley and Lone Tree Valley received the highest ratings. The proposed Bwchanan Field 1,hster Plan Study intends to update and incorporate all pertinent data developed from the County's site selection studies. I i 003;18 [yy 4� fC The ABAG/bi1C Regional Airport Planning CMMittee (RAPC) reviewed this proposal at its July, 1975 meeting. The RAPC noted that there are several issues with i regard to Buchanan Field development which will warrant some attention. These include: -1) access to property west of the airport; 2) amount of property needed for parking, ramp space and associated developments; 3) acquisition of property for clear zones; 4) future CNQ.� contour lines; and S) means for improving ILS capabilities. The RAPC, finding the proposal to be consistent with policy of the Regional Transportation Plan which supports expansion and improvements,at regionally significant general aviation airports such as Buchanan Field, rnded approval of this County application. staff recoAmends approval of this application by the Federal Aviation Administration. ,.;oa�ity .Noise Equivalent Level 2Instnmient Landing System 00309 ; r viCtaw w swu[R PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME R warf00 oirin*..vna•»c. •»a c+.av« PwwL%C .0.4w6 W CONTRA C/�v�/'��'_'� ♦ CO Ty 009+ its. Covol"Ovit VE"NON L.. r-'J"r i\.J)J��ii COSTA [1✓ 1' 1 J. L.TAYLOR Chitr akrYlr r'ti*LIC w0O^*OMtCtO+� .1N• L,00w.apwiwi.taatiOr wuiLDitsO asrurr.raOaa COtii.PL R.D.6ROATC" MARYtNEZ. CALIFORNIA 94333 it!*D&Acit•awivt acrua r.ry*iwk** AND.t.•i:d lr[L*r++a++L ss*aaoo MARK L KERMIT t►cwtr-.utas June 10„ 1475 RECEIVED JUIN 1! 1975 e v=O Ofnce of the Goverror Of3'ice of planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sa,mmenta, California. 95814 Attention: clearinghouse Review Gentle 9nt Enclosed is Contra Costa, Co»nty Board of S"perv'sorst Resolution dated Slay 20. 1975 togethar -Ath Fora CA 1899 Project Astriew Requests for the preparat3.on of an Airport Raster Flom for Bachanan Field Airports Concord, C:LZifornia. A prelizainarq antlins of the vrop►ased Study and a copy of the current Airport layout Plan Field are also enclosed. These dommntsa axe b6ing for 3�nc?saaaa fared cane F118ttO rs the Association of Bay Area Governasents for pre,,PpUcation review prepara'•arY to our requesting fln�ds Hader the FAA=s Planning Grant Prograta for 1irport3. -lour expeditiaus reviev of the enclosed documOuts will be appreciated. Very truly yours, Victor V. Sauer Public Works Director Marerin E. Scott ,Airport Manager NES:cp1 Enc. Coa..ra Mosta County Hoard of Supervisors Rasalut3.on Fara CA 189 F3uchanan Field Airport layout Plan cc County' A,d=jnistrator bee Arnold Tho=pson Associates 00310 I RE GOVERNOWs OFFJCC CFI V EO OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH AUS 2 3400 TENTH STREET AUS 1975 SACRAMENTO >a31314 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. RECEIVED August 18, 1975 pub3-1c Works Director By 2iasPin E. Scott Airport 2fanager County Award of guplsrvi.sora 88501uti-on lac• Coz&ra C Fora CR 189 s Buchanan Fi,a'ld, Airport layout Plan • County Acc id strs►tor bcc Arnold Tkw=psan Associates 00310 71 vf Cr-'all Drill RECEIVED r' GOVERNOW5 OFF1CC Cr-'all OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH AIJG 2 2400 TENTH STREET 5 �9T$ SACRAMENTO 95834 S170 0 EDMUND G. BROWN J'%- RECEIVED w. RE EIV D August 18, 1975 - AUG 2 21975 Mr. Mary .SCOtt DUCHAWAN FIELD 171 John Glenn Drive - Concord. CA - ! SUBJE-CT: SCH ;75061690 - Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Aixpot::� Dear Mr. Scott: . Tha above listed project was submitted by the State Clearinghouse to numerous State agencies for review. The review has been completed, and; there were no comments. i Although this letter verifies your compliance with the required preapplication review, the review will not be complete until an environmental document is received and ' reviewed by the State. When that document is forwarded to the State Clearinghouse, it must be identified by means of ; the State Clearinghouse number. ! We request that you use the State Clearinghouse number 1 assigned to your project on the cover page of your application and on all subsequent references to this application, since ,:- will be used by the funding agency when the State Clear- inghouse is notified of the awarding of your grant. Sincerely, William r:. Ki rkhar. Management Systems Officer j State Clearinghouse i 'irk it-B ; 1 I70 n02 ltitia tott�t.tOlp�ppt.►�ti..p- _ rGVER SNEET for FEDER. ANT APPLICATION/A4YARD N SCA I 1 APPLICA-1101 DATE artd other Project Reviews--S .+ E OF CALIFORNIA y' and day - 19_25C5 12 ITEUS 1.31 TO BE COMPLETED By APPLICANT , 3,A PLICANT -Otganlratior.el Unit Contra Costa 4-ADDRESS-Street or P.O.Bo. FEDERAL EMPLOYEE' L Count P Works Department6th-Floor, Admin. Bldc;. S.C1T•Y 6.COUNTY ].STATE •ZIP CODE PF d" ! __ornestte Assist ; MartKlrpdri 'Planning inez Contra Costa CA 94553 Grant Proc 70.TY•E OF ACTION TY.tP--E�OF CHANGE lCmnpiete If Ob oe 110c was checited) 14.EXISTING FED G= r New e ❑ Modif.eatittn a LJ Int�r•asa0 D.U.. a ❑Increased Duration •13 D 0th••Scow Cn OD Continuation b❑Decreased Dollars b DDecraased Duration b DCanc•Itation yr mo 19.APPLICANT TYPEEnrr L•ctn: 7� 'FLW SRfONESTE CA-C� yrrin* .OnyAmLa/Incl�ltar 15.REpUESTED FUND START 19 75 -M A.State F. School District D20 fEDER" If IS 30,000 16.FU;IDS DURATION -Months) B. Interstate G. ConrtwnityActi-Ape 21.57ATE f )S -0- yr mo C. Sub State Dat H. Stsonsored Organisation 27,LCCAL f is 151000 I7.ES•fi,PROJECT START 1975 -0-7 D. County 1. Indian 2M ormER f 1 S -0- i8.EST.PROJECT DURATION 124Mor.thal I E- City J. Ot).ertsoecifyinRonw 7a TOTAL aV.21.27,231 f 1S- r 25.BRIEF TITLE OF APPLICANT'S PROJECT Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport 26-DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT(Purpose) : A study to prepare 5-, 10-, and 20-year plans of development for Buchanan : Field Airport. The study will include aviation demand forecasting, capacit : analyses, a determination of facility requirements, an environmental asses. : ment, and the preparation of airport, land use, access, and financial plan- 27.ARIEA OF PROJECT IMPACT llndicate City.County,State,etc-) Costra Costa County ID e o 28.CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 2%Environmental Assessment Require - 30.CLEARINGHOUSES)TO WHICH SUBMITTED StatdFaderai A B ' y Agency? tr2�yy�1 Ot Applicans D+atricts Impacted By Project L'7 Yes P �•thl ] ON* &4J1 State b INAreaWide cONone 31,a r*MEITiTLE OF CONTACT PERSON b ADDRESS-Street w P.O.Bos 171 John Glenn Drc TELEPHONE NO , Mary Scott Concord California 94520 1415-685-07 31.d)�ENVi$ONMENTAL t10CUhlcNT REVIEW REQUIRED YES$] NO ❑ e(Vin h project regtrae h It project is physical in nature or requir It Yes D Env.ronmetttat Itttoaa Statettteat(Reflort)Amdwd(20 tapes) re iori.1 enveronmental document,list the U.S. 0 OrattEIR ❑ Final EIR Y N Geologic SurweyQuadranglemap inwh ❑ Negative Declaration Attached(2O copies) t Does yotr.runty Aare a project is looted. 7 tswo None attached-Document Win Be Forwarded On actcivgion n po�hts altfer pia • AYES KI Illy NaltdOplanT • Approxinutely tz 9 Ol 76� LOCO Day Year 9 Is pp�r M covered by II No Federal Program Does Not Require An Environmental Docurnem A-9S r1 11VoVl . Project Exempt Under State Categorical Exemption.Class If yYe-Sis�OA o exe12 YES ❑ No ❑ : ITEMS 32-38 TO BE COMPLETED By CLEARINGHOUSE OULTIPLE 32.CLEARINGHOUSE IDri b C]CLEARINGHOUSE S3.a JgCTION EASED ON 33,b ACTION TAKEN REVIEW OF STATE APPLICATION [ �(�!D +p((Notification & ❑with Coitvt. , c tniawao IDENTIFIER (SAIL ' A ( j C U Ap lieationb QUuhout Comment d�Unfavorable State Number STATE WIDE County! Gtr Countwt Gtr County/ City County/ City County/ Cay n-2A,-. C 35.CL€ARINGHOUSE e..tta-----i�i Ping Area Ping Ata& Ping Area Ping Area Ping Arra IMPACT CODE 1_..J Yes 36 STATE PLAN REQUIRED 37_RECEIVING CLEAR ATINGHOUSE �' ATttRt:Cii"Cii-OFFICIO( : D Yeaq, No 38-FINAL c1+ACTION DATE t9� a : L.J ( r ITELtS 39.32 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT BEFORE SENDING FORM TO FEDERAL AGENCY • The applicant cettit/en that to the best of has 4rgv.(ed9e and belief Vw abo.•data are true and 39.CEpTI FICATION- correct end IiiirO9 of this torts hes been duly autnwired by the gtrvNnirtg body of the applicant. Check box it cltaringhOUS! (v' response is attached. E4 40,a WAME(Print or Type) b TITLE c SIG TORE of Autnorued R ntat,we je�T LEPHONE NUMB! Harvin E. Scott, Airport Hatsager 685-072: 41,DATE MAILED TO FEDERALISTATE AGENCY vqe rno day �42-NAME OF FEDERAL J STATE AGENCY ' 19_26 1 28 TO WHICH THIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED FAA ITEMp 43.54 TO BE COMPLETED SY FEDERAL OFFICE EVALUATING AND RECOW%1EaJDING ACTION ON THE APPLICATION 43.GFIANT APPLICATION 10 I52. Appaieat+on Reed. 53-a Exp Acton Date ^ 53"1i Ret to Appl.ca :(Assigned by Federal Agency) ` yr mo OarAlwaysCOmpl-le 19 19 53a OR b ly 44-G ,ANTOR AGENCY -- --- -_ _ R A.nerwed A"hc• R Rev.Expected 54. Exp-Action R Sui.su.ii.em R E Racew.ed E Act.on Date lwlse E ADpicant 45.ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT V V V I w trio day I Ve m0 day yr MO day I yI ins• S S S I 19 1 19 19 1 19 46.A•MINISTE RING OFFICE U ---- -" '-- ----- - 19 N t9 - ___ __ 19_x_-__ N t9 N S t9- $ IS, - 19 $ 19 47.A;)DRESS-Street or P.O.Bur 48.CITY 9.STATE So.ZIP CODE 51.TELEPHONE NUMBER ITF"SS5G5TOBE COMPLITEOBY T•.E FE Or RAL OFFaCE APPROVING THE GRANT APPUCAT&ON i FINAL ACTION FINAL DATES we rno day FUNDSAPPROVED Mow CAanstfShow OnlyAmr.ofInc. I-J drDK. l•1./ 155.a nAwardet b ❑ Rejected c ❑w.mdrawn t9- 6Q FEDERAL ANOUNT IF Y lundll f IS 56. FC NDS AVAILABLE 19 61-STATESHARE f 1S 57,ENDING DATE 19 67 LOCAL SNARE `li f JS 5B. FEDERAL GRANT 10 63 OTHER `j �- • ( IS 64. TOTAL 160.61.6T.63) r Is S9.F4DERAL FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER b5. MULTIPLE PROGRAM-LifJK I Do no:typi to the lett of dotted tine ' -j~COVER SHEET for FEDERAANT APPLICATION/AWARD N .;A I 1 APPLICATION DATE : and other r'.Project Reviews-S E OF CALIFORNIA yr mo day ITELIS 1.31 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 195 12 3.A .-LICAN -Orswu:eusinal Unit Contra Costa 4.ADDRESS-Street Or P.O.Boa 2 FEDERAL EMPLOYER= County, Public Works Department 6th Floor, Admin. Bldg. &COUNTY 7-STATEr;ZIP CODE5.CITY9.PROG T1TLEMO.(Catalog of Fed Domenic FMartinez Contra Costa CA 4553 JAirport Planning Grant Pr 10 TY•E OF ACTION TYPE OF CHANGE(Complete It lob or 10c wee chocked) 14.EXISTING FED G.- � 11. 12. 13. y®Near c ❑ Modification • ❑IncreseedDollars • ❑IncrewdDuration • ❑Other Scope Ch O❑Continuation b❑Decreased Dollars b❑Decreased Dur.tion b❑Cancellation �vt raw 19.APPLICANT TYPE fUNQf REOUL'S"I'll r CArgrr S--04/rAmL of lntN'_ 1S.REQUESTED FUND START 19-M J 9 En's`""' []D 30,000 Q 7�� A.State F. School District 2R fEOE/tdlt ( J= 16.FUiiDS DURATION I�iMonths) B. Interstate G. Community,Action Ageno21.STATE f )$ -0 : yr Eno C. Sub State Det H.Sponsored Organization 2ZLOCAL f is 15,000 17.ESE.PROJECT START 1875 7 D. County I. Indian uOTHER ( )S -o- 1B.ESY.PROJECT DURATION 12tMonsha E. City J. OthertSpedfy InRainarx 2a.TOTAL I2o.2r.22,22) is 45 .OOO 25.BRIEF TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport 26.DEfCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT(Purpose) : A study to prepare 5-, 10-, and 20-year plans of development,for Buchanan : Field Airport. The study will include aviation demand forecasting, capaci- : analyses, a determination of facility requirements, an environmental asses.- : ment, and the preparation of airport, land use, access, and financial plan. 27.ARI=A OF PROJECT IMPACT(Indicate City.County:Stase.etch : Contra Costa County M►ID I WIDE CC 28.CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 29.Enwlrorvnantal Assessment Required 30.CLEARINGHOUSES)TO WHICH SUBMITTED Ortt Applicant Districts Impacted By Project By Steta/Fa laral Agency? ®Yes L 7th I I -ON. •$.Stat. -b ®Area YYlde c❑None 31,a b"MEITITLE OF CONTACT PERSON b ADDRESS-Street or P.O.Boa 171 John Glenn Dr, a TELEPHONE NC ;Mary Scott Concord California '94520 415-685-0" 31.d It ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIRED YES NO Q e Will ills project require h It project is h • ��$g rsk► anon? physical in nature or tf Yes LJ Envunrimental Impact Statement(Report)Attached(20 copies) envlronrrlental document,list the U.S. YES M 0 Draft EIR 0 Final EIR N 'GeobgicSurwy Quadrangle map in, O Negative Declaration Attached(20 copies) I Does your cy have a project Is looted. civil None attachad-potS>rt>erK LNiU Be Forwatded tpn 7 6* actin poohts ti►nlativa 77 11 action policy and plan? Approxitn•tNy YES In NO R W VAN"D •son Day Year of ppolect covered by It No ® Federal Program Does Not Require An Environmental Docurmht A Y Pt IVT YE`S [7 NO 13 (w Project Exempt Under State Csteyorital Exsrnpootl,Class If Yes.is A executed? JUN14-111-� 75 *Preparation a study element YES 0 NO D : ITEMS 32-38 TO BE COeaPLETED BY CLEARINGHOUSE . UL L --- 5�" 32,CI4�EARINGHOUSE tD ❑CLEARINGHOUSE1 0'7 33,•2CTION BASED ON 33.b ACTION TAKEN 4EVIEW OF ❑Wesco STATE APPLICATION) T +0 Notification a �W.V.Comrnmi c 34' IDENTIFIER (SAl► A O A plication b❑Without Comment d❑Unfavorable I 1State Number STATE WIDE County/ City County/ City County/ City County/ City County/ City County/ T35.CL€ARINGHOUSE Ping Area Plug Area Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area Ping Area IMPACT CODE �]Yes❑rho : El 36 ST}►TE PLAN REOUIREO 37.RECEWWG DATE day '38,a$IG UF3E OF CH OFFICIAL • AT CLEARINGHOUSE 19-9-1- , ❑Yes ©No 38.FINAL CH ACTION DATE 193rr : ITEMS 39.42 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT BEFORE SENDING FORM TO FEDEFIAL AGENCY The applicant certifies that to Via best of his knowledge and belbf the above data wistrw.nd 39.CE)iTIFICATION - Check box if clearinghouse L correct and tiling of this tore has' aidy authorized ler the governing body of the applicerlt. response is attached. 40.• WAME(Print or Type) b TITLE a SIGNATURE of Authorised�R Jesentat w. d TELEPHONE r : Har7in E. Scott! ,tippet Maaiger , F /. 4 (k15) �S-0'I2' 41,o4TE/MAILED TO FEDERALISTATE AGENCY ve goo day 42-NAME OF FEDERAL / STATE AGENCY 1976 1 28 TQ WHICH THIS APPLICATION SUBMITTED g" : ITEMS 43.54 TO BE COMPLETED BY FEDERAL OFFICE EVALUATING AND RECOMMENDING ACTION ON THE APPLICATION 43.CHANT APPLICATION ID 52_ Application R-14- 153.a E s0.Action Date 53.11 Res to A_ .(Assigned by Federal Agency) y m0 day yr m0 day r Always�mp!!t! w con 53.aOR b 44.G'ANTOR AGENCY 19 19_ 19 _ : R Amended ApP"c. R Raw.E xpected 54.E ep.Action R Sutnliwa nl : E Racewred E Action Date Revised Aoolic-As o+ •� 45,OflGAN12ATIONAL UNIT V V V .^ 1 ( yr rrno day ( Yr nno day yr mo day ( yr mo S S S ( t9 ( 19 19 I 19 46.A•MINISTE RING OFFICE O -�-- --- --- �- N 19� 0 t9 O _ 19 19 S 19 S 15-__ �_ 19� S /9 47.AI?DRESS-Street or P.O.Bo■ 43.CITY' 9.STATE ISO.ZIP CODE 51.TELEPHONE NUMBE : ITEMS SS SS TO BE CO"I'tETE0Bv THE FEOFRAL OFFICE APPROVING THE GRANT APPLICATION FINAL ACTION FINAL DATES yr Brno day i FIIVDSAPPROVED)FonC/tangrsShow OnlyAmLofInc.fo-)orDm1-1.1 55.a'�Awarded b ❑ Relecred e ❑W.sndrarrn 19- 6a FEDERAL AMOUVT 1F Y funds) 1 )S 56,Fl�INDSAVAILABLE t9 6LSTATESHARE ( )s 57,ENDING DATE 19 67.LOGLSHARE 00e?13 1 )s 58 FEDERAL GRANT ID 63.OTHER ! : bit. TOTAL 160,61,62,63) U S9.FTDERAL FUND ACCOUN NUMBER !65•AeULTt7LE PROGRAM-LINK ya Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont - Berkeley.California 94705 • (415)841-9730 RfiCElVET DATE: June 19, 1975 .�f. N 2 3 1975) TO: Marvin Scott Airport Manager , CUCHAN►.'APF F:LL`_ -Contra Costa County 171 John Glenn Drive Concord, CA 94520 FM: Metropolitan Clearinghouse Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont Berkeley, CA 9470S Project: Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport As the Metropolitan Clearinghouse, and in accordance with the procedures of Circular A-95, of the Office of Management and Budget, the Association has notified affected agencies of your project. We enclose comments received from the City of Pleasant Hill. Circular A-95 (revised 1/1/74) requires that applicants include with the completed application as submitted to the granting Federal Agency: 11(1) Any comments and recommendations made by or through clearinghouses, along with a statement that such comments have been considered prior to submission of the application; or (2) A statement that the procedures outlined in this section have been followed and that no comments - or recommendations have been received." Sincerely, �, Ivaide Egener Principal Planner Plan and Project Review cc: Les Hopkins, FAA Enclosures) Reprememi±lc Ci :,aflC C un;:s(we .1-news in the Soil,--1 Francwcs,Bit• Afea 00314 i i VICTOR W. SAUER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • R. D. BROATCH PUBLIC WORKS O4OCL70B 09"TT•BUSINESS AND S[RVICLS 44131 272.2102 CONS COSTA A couNTY [4Is) 272.2101 VERNON L. CLINE R. U. RYGH 1 CHIEF OCPUTV PUBLIC WORKS Otor"OR BTU FLOOR' AD"INISTRATIOU BUILDING D[IUTV.BU/LOINGS AND GROUNDS 44151 272QIO2 HARTINEL CALIFORNIA 94333 ROOU its, COURTHOUSE [4111 272.2214 � MARK L. KERMIT 04:PUTY-T71AMs.ORTw710N January 28, 1976 J. E. TAYLOR 44101 272`2102 OLIUTT.OF[RATtONS AND FLOOD CONTROL 225 GLACI[R DRIVE 941.51 2724470 Mr. James L. Alkire, City Manager City of Pleasant Lii13 3300 N. Main Street - Pleasant Rill, CA 94523 Dear Mr. Alkire: This is in response to your comments dated June 18, 1975 to the Association of Bay Area Governments reouesting citizen,participation In the Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport and expressing concern for the residents of Pleasant Hill and the two school districts* facilities located in Pleasant Hill. The study will include an environmental assessment and field studies to determine the ambient noise levels within the airport environs as sell as noise monitoring of aircraft to proportion and verify the CNEL contours. Maximum citizen participation will be encouraged. It is planned to use the Contra Costa County Aviation T i ai son Committee as a form to conduct such meetings. The ALC meets on the third Tuesday of each month at 8:00 p.m. in Roam 108 in the County Administration Building in Hart-Inez. Your city Is on the regular miling list to receive notices of such meetings through the published ALC agendas. -. Your comments and interest in the study are appreciated. very truly yours, Victor W. Sauer Public Works Director ?aurin E. Scott Airport Manager ME :cpl 00315 J •� r ` .. _�: �+.'^. s�f• • :lr- s. ^�.a.sr?,...sr f'�= _.. M' h:+7Ktl7aL�I _City Of Pleazalt2t ii _ ��C3C'tfl?• . 1 /jar .i"a:Gy _ fir'i•'S`i'`� ' w1111 _ 3300 N.MAIN STREET,PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA 94523 PHONE(4151934-6050. r; 2 :3 1975 WCHANAN FI%L June 18, 1975 RECEIVED Association of Bay Area Governments JUS Hotel Claremont 1975 Berkeley, Calif. -94705 PROJECT �yIEH( Gentlemen: Enclosed is our response by postcard to Contra Costa County's application for funds to study the future of Buchanan Airport in the proposed Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport. The City of Pleasant Hill requests information on the provisions made for citizen participation in this study. Our primary concerns are as follows: a. 20, 000 residents of Pleasant Hill live under the approach and take- off patterns already established at Buchanan Field. b. Contra Costa County Junior College District houses 10, 000 day- time students on land in Pleasant Hill under the patterns mentioned above. c. Mt. Diablo Unified School District operates one high school (1800 students), one intermediate school (1, 000 students), and one elementary school (600 students) in Pleasant Hill under the patterns mentioned above. Participation by citizens representing the city and the two school districts in the planning process would seem essential in order to insure a generally acceptable result. 1 Respectfully yours, JLA:dh James L. All.^ire City Manager cc: J. Maguire, Airport Land Use Com2' ee J. McLaughlin, Planning Director 00316 x i .tM ► - r�vr Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont - Berkeley,California 94705 - (415)841-9730 DATE: June 13, 1975 D TO: Mary Scott JUN 17 1975 I Contra Costa County, PUBUC WORKS DEPAUMENT Public Works Department 6th Floor, Administration Bldg. ' Martinez, CA 94553 FM: Areawide Clearinghouse Association of Bay Area Governments Hotel Claremont ! Berkeley, CA 94705 PROJECT: Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport 1 The Association has received your Form CA-189 notifying us of your intent to apply for assistance under the Airport Planning Grant Program of the Department of Transportation. As the Areawide Clearinghouse, and in accordance with the procedures of Circular A-95 of the Office of Management and Budget, the Association has notified the following affected agencies of your project: Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Sierra Club, Mount Diablo Chapter League of Women Voters , San Francisco Bay Chapter Cities of: Concord Martinez Antioch Brentwood Clayton E1 Cerrito Hercules Lafayette Richmond Pinole Pittsburg Pleasant Hill San Pablo Walnut Creek We will notify you immediately should any of the agencies notified raise an issue concerning your proposal. ABAG staff finds this proposal to be primarily of local significance and not in conflict with the policies and programs of the Association. However, final clearance of 1 your proposal requires ABAG•s Executive Board approval. Form t s i;=_:Msent%n:Ci`;and Cart: the S+nn Francisco Bay Yraa 00131'7 Mn E 2 189 with Part II completed will be forwarded to you shortly after ,Executive Board action. Executive Board meetings are normally ' scheduled for the third Thursday evening of each month.. 6 Sincerely, Waide Egener Principal Planner Planner Plan and Project Review i Cy r ' t i t ' d flt r fr en -vs � J ( do r.0 opo a e M ffaflia 3A GA C12�' A M • ' A _ y1r r N J zm • Y 4 91 O j • s fw 0 A Q 2 N • � f/0 } a c o O Or a m w S► a IC2) .r. It OW O wv. A CK O ri Q • z a C? Q 0 ' Cd G7Gm o cy iR S c -t -n n o «• r -4 ° 70 twit a A 4^ sn 3: y s O m O r K V rl/�� o. •r Ci M N H H f Va z s O - O • a � ` a 4 m M iA C N v► �` o G 6 CO Oo C) O O o o .. n W i ILI - INSTRUCTIONS PART 111 the grantor agency. Enter in Columns (c) and (d) the est' mated amounts of funds which will remain unobligated. entral Instructions the end of the grant funding period only it the Fedcraf grantor agency instructions provide for this. Otherwise, IThis form is designed so that application can be made for leave these columns blank. Enter in columns(e)and (f)the from one or more grant PraF� In preparing the budget adhere to any existing Federal grantor agency amounts of funds needed for the upcoming period. The guidelines whir prescribe how and whether budgeted arnount(s) in Column (g) should be the sum of amounts in amounts should be separately shown for different function's Columns(e)and M. or activities within the program-For some programs,grant- Foy supplemental grants and changes to existing grants, or agencies may require budgets to be separately shown by do not use Columns (c) and (d). Ener in Column (e) the function or activity. For other programs„ grantor agencies amount of the increase or decrease of Federal funds and may not require a breakdown by function or activity.Sec- enter in Column (f) the amount of the increase or decrease tions A, S. C. and D should include budget estimates for of non-Federal funds. In Column (g) enter the new total the whole project except when applying for assistance budgeted amount (Federal and non-Federal)which includes which requires Federal authorization in annual or other the total previous authorized budgeted amounts plus or funding period increments-In the latter case.Sections A.B. minus, as appropriate, the amounts shown in Columns (e) C. and D should provide the budget for the first budget and (t). The amount(s) in Column (g)should not equal the period (usually a year) and Section E should present the sum of amounts in Columns(e) and(f). need for Federal assistance in the subsequent budget peri- ods. All applications should contain a breakdown by the Line 5—Show the totals for all columns used, object class categories shown in Lina a-k of Section B. Section B.Budget Categories Section A Budget Summary to the column headings(1) through (4), enter the titles of Lines 1-4.Columns W and(b). the same programs,functions,and activities shown on Lines For applications pertaining to a single Federal grant pro- 1-4, Column (a). Section A. When additional sheets were gram (Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog number) and- prepared for Section A,provide similar column headings on not requiring a functional or activity breakdown, enter on each sheet. For each program, function or activity, fill in Line 1 under Column (a) the catalog program title and the the total requirements for funds (both Federal and non- catalog number in Column(b). Federal)by object class categories. For applications pertaining to a single program requiring tiudget amounts by multiple functions or activities. enter Lukes 6a-b—Show the estimated amount for each direct the name of each activity or function on each line in Col- rpt budget (object dass) category for each column with umn (a). and enter the catalog number in Column M.For program,function or activity heading_ applications pertaining to multiple programs where none of Line 6i—Show the totals of Lines 6a to 6h in each column. the programs require a breakdown by function or activity. enter the catalog program title on each line in Column (a) Line 6j—Show the amount of indirect cost- Refer to Of- and the respective catalog number on each line in Column fice of Management and Budget Circular No.A-87. (b)- Line 6k—Enter the total of amounts on Lines 6i and 6j. For applications pertaining to multiple programs where For all applications for new grants and continuation grants one or more programs rMuirr a breakdown by function or the total amount in column (5), Line 6k, should be the activity.prepare a separate sheet for each program requiring same as the total amount shown in Section A.Column(g), the breakdown. Additional sheets should be used when one Line 5. For supplemental grants and changes to grants,the form does not provide adequate space for all breakdown of total amount of the increase or decrease as shown in Col- data required, However, when more than one sheet is used, umns (1)-(41. Line 6k should be the same as the sum of the i the first page should provide the summary totals by pro- amounts in Section A.Columns(e) and(f)on Line 5.When grams. additional sheets were prepared, the last two sentences ap- Lines 1-4.Columns(c)through(g). ply only to the first page with summary totals, i For new applications, leave Columns (c) and (d) blank. Line 7—Enter the estimated amount of income, if any. I For esch line entry in Columns (a) and (b), enter in Col- expected to be generated from this project. Do not add or umns (e). M. and (g) the appropriate amounts of funds subtract this amount from the total project amount.Show I needed to support the project for the first funding period under the program narrative statement the nature and i (usually a year). source of income. The estimated amount of program in- For continuing grant prMram applications,submit these come may be considered by the Federal grantor agency in I forms before the end of each funding period as required by determining the total amount of the grant- i I I 00 i i 1 u •s o o v .�. Ir M • ¢ o i p ••» rn cl zz M t � o to a p a • CK 4 m 3 C7 p As i y rn a o rn I � 3► "1 �, s � . Est > p rn rn x n O Z In • '� x -� i "i • rn M r 1 r M t O '^ tpEt In O l m C3 m 40 m C 4p7 rn A rn - rn w v E-- rnrn rQi 4 -nn x G7 rn n -- o rn N :! c -n pion Est * E"s I N o m EZ►01d v ! a+ v � .f �„ w �• .r Zo r w a rn -a Q n a. O N -4 E� Q1O e C o a x = a rn r+ m ca) w r M S.r k ✓ M rn ! I.J + P a o Anaoa i V 0 a • A 4 ooiq' 1 7-t - + r: = w` c o w-A c -:, • c+=� .r. - - 2 - `E" : o S qy6 1 DS 2.a r3- 3 d � w o Do 3 s3nca 3 � c o - a 2rY~Dw .cAda_ _r v► =� _ 0 0 a. d 7 in d o a 7 = T c O C �,' " c s'w a^a w r O � � S � C a La ry f M c w 7 r n ) na 1d,od, �. oaof sm ! < 1 .cs t >> 1 3 3 viol E. � 3 b � 3k, : n i^, "m s vac _ o 0 C3 m a m r m m e nm a a o o or ^ ..."-* < a t ca 0 o d s o c o cis r mss,, R i m z o, Z o o• c c r. r m-, o D c o+' rT,�o fn c a_ .o_= r 6 4 pp c A� A a r =3 t 3 t A r t Dc t 3 ! Cdr eir h a <e`� -n.r0...'� O n m +� C i s S s �s 7 +� O j = '} O . 2 ? O A < G 3 r-, 3 _ O " r ?s + d � +�. Nis 00 s p m- ;ti r O �" > O w 0 3 A O a 3 < r A i_ _ -T ! a- Qp�q O 0 _ m A novo c� 3 c_ Sao d3 r .. oar -c x =' c Q.w a .,C �..O r r C O O S"_ O 3 + O r ? n q w S F > > S A •7 rr. G r A 0 3 a a m.. 7 M C c ? 0 er c 4 �s r q ?� �s}T O A '"' o-c- O • =a Z 7c O �+ QbaT Ors 3 Qa r �_", iL 'a"'.A . .� w w0 00 ."�' a "� d e a+�{ A S < '°' a A O? e=,r qC -1 _ s ? A j O ?g "� p"' s c 'C A e a" O i q< A h:. r 3 ? Jr O y G. p .. O �a „i. a, ?'a < > Z. s ? O r O O'3 A A 3 Ar r N.`.. A •fl q Y 07-, w S !A 3 C A _ C ?i.��. A d •'n .s g a.� =C ,= o a ; o '�o ," 3 3 0 : O e : ? Q�-,`C e� .+. Q a q +� Q D3 c r- d 3 r c r S ccs a Mn 3 `"' ffo d`= M o ems• �_ a .�• 3 3 ca � CGper r S p Z. 3 A A r r o V -- .�. o .. d ... A d 7R' Z q cr r �' . ? ~ A w O O M r 3 C. OQ.Q d a O W < x� x r p' C ns _ .: coA - 3o d c c A � n ca� A r O 0 r *� Fd jr a � oc4,0 oov .0 $ r =_rcn� n� dr t0 sr Q O 5 C O i1 'V O r r+ aa d0 a< ? my � Oj a r:0 ++ 0 N AO 3 N °= ~ O x•+ _•A 31 a s '7< O O 5-- O m a CL p O O 4! N Qr O r SgLo Li K G A O.A ._7 D O b< w C a O A ~7 A j a 9O7 'm" 1 m d t t r0 ��„ SAtl d.-�A Aria _„ win$ Q's 0 < C � • wnO Or<_ QOA ' O O+ O Z.c 0 C r 2 S O w r a �' m !..a. 3.o = + O ? < "� G n y", j•` ?a a s O r w 3 a th m O a �! 3 r, •p 3 d a• mac` ?"'M . 3 w Q 'i!. p r * 3 .ate. r!4 d m c -_ $ M,rte„ 2 a 3 O 'er sas A M "' m �,o w a< r d !cr ZlII dd^QCT O 1+ b w0, 0 ? n 3 ; 71 CL vCL < r A N 3 a� d + c o r w O O a .w O+C z A ,� o •. o. 7>'O +w g 3 M <3 =oor "w ^� o a 2S :1 -4 ac - " +^ A a+`� 3y 3 . g " a o a 3 c a r ^ate z v m c n o` er 4 3 = v o g : r P. Is �:d sa A as a =' sow -Colo g=ao x a 3o a -a cdc' _ r � x cs !. t 3 c7 c q CL O C 'n !C ''. c o + Q w D 4 r 4 A � -'a < � � LE 3 .'s �" �: -1 03 ocaoic°'3ar aow cm7 d < 9r-Cco �� o0.0 � "3' -rDi o .� :: o d 0 Z _ 3 �_ d !+ a `S a -•c s e uT:, 3 -1 v �► ;� 3 N < c co °iac=Tai 77�r < D ag3osaA = o3 �+v G 0 ,ecs a �. '^ C o I. +A+ k S OMCO ?r .. d Q d a m M 'O ?m fl ~ o O < A O S O O f O .+ • "' D p A D ' q+ q w w nA„ C,� A O A e O C w s.o D s t e O wC j 0 0' C a M K O w d c 10N q 3 U 0 4w^ o�i A,^ S A r r A d n o •� !'A • m 3 j + + C O 'C O A O.Ai. °i c S„ _o s row O D "� w "�' y o,O d °� 3 --m1S3 � . RA i� „ocz3 wc_ c =0� 2 CQ. om .. + gam, < w < � 3coor23 � - ?0a� 0 ? � > 3 cm q v c w < A A n d < A G. S Q At O 3 O S A .* O► •Tf 01 1 CS A Fr CL. *Tax _.i' cca- e' anaao as ao.�re r' er, Sr� 3ae:ci .. .-�r � .O"i .a` n <~� .. " � Qd-� .� 3n�w �co3Xr. oD+y �oa 9a '� = 3" ag" ,a, s .�� 'g`Z'3o ,po`ac ^ �� =< 3wcd `- " ?: CL :r3 :C �r ao Z' = ` a c �cws c - 3 7 3_ AOi w r O :r O 47 • A r w Z n a S Z"�r A O > O O r D X g O .'�.. i• p w w d�y 3 c A n O +. O q M ns O A �Q c� o C� .'� M <d c•"u r ,?« 3 0 c w d c a r 3 p ..o f'a m o r k6 0 .c: d� Cs Yw x 3 5 cr 27 L f! .7 M �•wa+ S 4 =O �, O 'ti _ A A r M w r G M Z j o A M ' � Tcs ^c an ^n ' fm �Q_ _ a_0A � a go vncr- 0 3 c w a 0 s' r r w w r O M O `� + O 0 4 0 M {�, .M q d Q �� ^� _n <a �Aea� Qo = < �od3 oa ! = Qa «� '. 30 > > ,:T en S O w a a S O L r 3 00 Z S` q j M w'.d�i 7r Y cr Y ?c r Dr �r e 3 3a m w .. aYd+ 0 + 3 4ri3 w G a.b A A O c h r s _ r w w O r 5 r11 O r O CL;; j O _ G,O cr n .� r, q w M 3 w c a � a < •s e'►¢? S " 3 i` �, a .: O ' 5- c, O 7 O+A 3 r A 0 j Y 3.o Q d +s r �r �O M 3 ND nn ^ CL G. �.. t+ �+'► ? r Z_ n r 7 S -� .o s' w fl r 0Z, x `CL^ T a 7C? ? : i mow' 3 s n '_� z o wr' G p wC ~n c aN. 3 ro 0 ? n s v a d w .� O ° + �' .3 3 f w 1 Y Y b 'b ►d %D co �i w 0% Ln .tsWNr an cn an H b W t' > H cn tai .3 W ftl 0 '=7 H cn [n O n C vs W N O W H O =1 ¢i m O cr H 4-3 a 1--= K H H H 14 3KGG - ID YQa10 H > m wW01 O m ¢ Z om O C Kr=sn :3 "G O w w C K art O wits as cr ca a to up W 0 crit � wV 0to � w tom+ H 05CH 0 H YCM-> a 15 H cr H O Wt' G rz H ,o K K 1--(1) y F-ACD ty cr 1F-I CD � W[fir Wt LG = Rr O 0o cr Y 0 rn F—m L< cr m ut 0 w 0 J-"(D n CD tog Cl Z cr to r 3 Q+m ti to a) H t r E td GR- w H rd M p H H y 0 CA .g a Y YY t 1 ci NY Y 0ttzj 1 cn Lica Y 1 1 J 1-&O1[AVON O Q1CC)OC1 N CYismNAm O H n !OA t,6 A cn H C NNNY NNNNN W :000 YW O W 1 W WrN W 0 Zr t+l WQ10N t Yco�.itnm0 ttl OH ►< N.sOW tn.21-00tn0 OOC M H K r< w tiD NNNY to tnWrt-'N 1 co Li i 1 � - - f x y H to t I I�t o%o w 0%.a m O "l cn oco0 -4 oft oYrft)coa CO 0 0 0000 Q 000000 w � H b in �s to X A t%j 1 t 1 A i 1 W z %a 1 r w N 1 1 0h CM a 1 1 .a►Y ca to to O O Cl O to O to [ti M Y H NNNr O (AWY!-N O 1 i • - .. • O SOC) (n 1 1 N 40in%0Qnmm A O%OWN N CMWI-+NNN to O to 0 Cl O O to Co a N oo,323 1 � 1 a rrr O rrr rotxf cn G w(D t9j U) • z q A K A pp.. t+9 0 O w H 3crV y 0cr�ri C zT i z wr0 Cl) mto c - ►� ' H O O o 1--o cr . C 05 1-w t -' A (Dcrt2i cr09 t n ! N M cwt' K to tri fin t� m cr 0 [rsJ to K c t� �' r ! w w� Qr Iq 3 ?� b cr ki.0i En cn m No tT to 3 H O :1 33 h K w cr K w 3 J G tri- =r Iq K cr aC 0 Cn 0 cr w - � p cl rA - cr w o - G cr W. r z n a1 N r N r I N W J.a►N N A cn 4N. A a1 a%O O a1 a) X6.a. Q w ;U O to � a t/f iA .b tas ca W N N C F+A N -i N%a ts1 r N N ;o 6 til m Co 0 a%r'%D C9 1H -M lis t/f 4m n ca 10 ao N Nrr m Nrr IH N N W 4l N N us O O Ln v to O O-A. O a1 CD C: O Cl O 0 0 0 O 0 Cl Co w to ►d In vs lw vs in X S11 N N N b m co N rro t I I t � p A N N O 1 I t l tb N Cl N Ln O 40 [�7 N O M tV N N *11 � .to. y O A aNN N t.nAN q o w woo A oa% t� O N NOO O OOC] 00324 N A tJ N r q 3 M cD m � to ID p � c m r- c cn r ID C 0 O c C 1tr I cm am NC O� O i o o m o ct o v cr m ct- cl cr ell &< tD V eta r 0 bo s ti cr, 2 go P-3 cr m c cis cC c w O Z N 2 H t'Jl r n K o m K o m vns� bc� bb cH " Kom � 0 (a wK cn �- HH Ai lL = m w V m co m lb � m 1+ m r- o � H po= rt►Ym 0 0 m 0 ft O f—cm O =1 O :1 HZ �l00 � ctKCpn GO crGO '< J= 00 ►.i .a b m m Y I--1-- Y!-- m Y t+- m Y t•-1 t--t-- H O O H 33 ct cr O to rr m cr o ct cr mon Oi'c! 0 :� t zy m ct lb cr !b !9 ct m cr to cr m O :1 CD r 0 O LD O tD r !D r y p y p cr ct cr cr (13 tfj z ool > Hpr .1 ;9ozoy O a O CD 01N J YYA O ArA N [N 2 al" ca a o0oaoom Go Go N ,c�cto a �oa�oaa m D. O HzH C y, O trs to N t/s tis H K 1--YNNa NN YNN YNNa N.t� �f -J C31 C> NOJ VOJtn -4 Ln �r r� ►� to (Ji O N O O ul to O N zn O tJl 0 Zn 0 Cil Ul 000100 OO OCO OCOOC OO (_ b r t„ vs tr, vs vs v, vs of to to fl i w N r Y Y r N r � U2 to NYYJW O Wtn O Nt.ar A ..1wYW 0 cnY Oy H h' O .P.QI N a% Y Q1 t11 N O N O (il ip N O at A 0%co C O ,b O 00000 O 101 CCl 000 O 0000 O l0 C ',t3h1 C!3 CD b to Aa t/s to t/f t/s t/f N N N x ~ 1 ! ! 1 I t 1 1 1 1 w I w t 1 t C-1 O t t .� 1 oA 1 Y !r t 2 to M O N O O O La (In cn •�• Ul N in to N N N N N tis to 'o"tJ N Y Y Y Y N r 0 a0 N F- N J w to t.a !n C1 N w 1-+ m J C%F-A to [D at j q U, Oa G1pcJ Q1tn N ONO N ON -o. at to Jm r (�(.1v 3 LA 0 O O O to O O O O O O O O OO 0 0 N Ln C) F'. i f F✓ (a cil cn ' Fes'- tq w 010 ,ttl w C }�.� Ch c b H cn F-4c7 H t1i C Q K O tT cr tr O H m H 1 ��,, c1 C • 1 K to i7' lG K ,,, cr ftl O to rr ce w O p „I ¢ cat- �s2 c, 0 t o � a w 3 x13 00 cocr (D I CD rt ~'ui � 1-.' f.. s< c�"r tw, O tri a n m .. M C O ¢" tij S+ b w • i ct' 1..► al il-- Q ID viH K �Q, to o W Ocar cr O C M [r Cu ca Alcl- Q fi aay •d vc� Qn n car � atmI-,- mtt em p � .� .�" y� a MO a � mIVwaw cH-30 3CDl- c" � Orn = = 0 new y► M `t ct ct m cor m m z cr °' r� o M 1'1 o �tw O 0 0 b CC1 0 cn at C1R 0 of 4m Q C Cn 10 h3 4^ �`I O N 0.2 N 1 N W pi O C?0 to C� n � t C►.o ..l +3 000 0o OC�o(a Cil o Ca C30 40 N 1+ t1U co US ca I co G .ta W Wtn IF- ft = 1-3CO ONCit C3 000 CS tJT NW 1 NWA O 0 lQk o 4 o C�oa o ao 0 Co C" CW r.0 O V o oao z► '�1 _�u y 1 � _-�►i 1 1'J / to i i t..t tis LTi / t i tis 0 t3 1 Ci . .r 1 o to to to cil N t-+ tJf {ff to W H H ILOO O t^' a tts m 1-• tri C.a cs 1 •• ,. t.� O O L4 N CS as 1 0 N W c► • � C'a CJt C7 ' a lz� Q40 a oC30 o � � � 00926 . t i IT f M to5"is n { VI w O r- (�D t i to A cn Q cn H Cn b 0 K Q 4 Gn Q.0 � a G G ta} � c:'Q rKr H 3: 14 �a �twi cr cr o cr er w 1a � ato 91x cr rr n m ft - M r1l 2 A m OWa% O 00tA 0 � Nw 1 O Nwis 0C000 0 000 0 00 0 ocn ob C O b o 000 y V Vt• -cm 4a -fa x ! 1 hf - Y I r l w t i w 1J1 t o 1 1 tJl (n Cl O 40 0 ! cn a 1-+ f 2 > O to to cn ' t'tl^ ca t!i N N l/f N N (If N O is 4a t 1 .a N co 1•— C1 W W ! • O O41C1 W OOW N ON O NWa Q��t;26 W 1c) HO O 1, 00 O 00 `� �' i O N us O 1 N �► t~ N r to cn A K A i z r i u' ::r 03 i+ CD ti 0 :3n 0 m cn crcl cr O r N m � K o 1 O o � a' m cr C cr 3'rS cr C �wO O v 0 O x Rc 1 H H cr a s cr a cr cr iG A s, � 0 m a V a � � Y n t7 t. cn n � Y �. r OK Y a tt C.K cr -- t+l b b a tf1 OftO [T! K !•-� ot..' � - � 3 H 0 V m � ,ct* cr ` to OA cr i � K cr _ a w A 91 A A cr Id so oAv� a m Y =1 ClkK Ow mK Ft0to vs m a m !r- 5 as al P-- a = to ta A Y- �taa CA AO ccrrr- 0 hl to cel- Sob crr vs m b 3 cre sm n E cct Y cr a a cr cr a a s cr > �G m Y m m E- rrfi H O A 2 a r 1... a Y Y Y t� f t+- N a w Y o CA a N a s (,,� II.•co pr o O lw C%CO ds o o a rn al o o O C o • Y YN.A� NN Na YNN �f N J -4N OSI vW NOS �r Cil fn to O O zn In O l!i O In [sl O O O O 40 0 CO O lO CO O go1 r N r r 1 cn • y 9.3In In 071 ut .C6 CD o% N Y r t0 N 0%F-' O 1 O O at.A.O Q1 O 0% co O CD O 0 0 0 C O 0 0 000 0 00 o Oo O 4000 w '�! O i V3, tK N vs to vs to vs to as 4m x w c ! t ! ! t ! ! 1 t t t t t f tai �M O tsi a N H W to a Y 1-+ llc�l N Y t� OO N V1 .is W to co Q1 N F-+ �-+ p(�q •�(1O O a% a O Cr O t7► m ca O O O O C'' O F, � ` . + O IC) O O O IC3 0 Cl O O O 0 0 0 a - 1 .. .� a► to C w ro � V fi 01 0 w d I O w M 0 ftl cw n �s �I I--m C x @ cr cr H m K A 0 tri K CO2 t itr N O �. w r w P 3 - tq K cv r n 2 'O = cD m O H OOC6 ;r =r W O v (a cl fn cr O cr O C M Cr Qs(A K�G cr O rr m m +d �d b w m mK mtf vs m mW mw U! n t4�+ Ga Q O '�! b O I+-r I--w N-w H O O Y alb WOO A :z ct cr @Y @Y H ?J 0 o n z at m Y j k!t 4 • r � K 2 � C1 N I Ir- N w Ch).-A a► IC>a% No.cn O C ;tt 4& to �- �.i c,n O Ctt O C+1 0 0 0 0 .•cn tis as •us �A m cn r.E O O O OO = % N iA iIf ilf f!> C=S ' cc O d:k. N 1 N f Z O Ln Itn O ti N ss ►3 r •J rt--nis 0. � � >%0N co wo cn 0 0 C) II' II C Airport Hanager ! Jbx vin E. Scott 1 Mr. Harvin Scott is bead of the Airport Division of Contra ! Costa County and has been =ungei of Buchanan Field Airport since 1956. s During this tine be has acted as coordinator of several major capital �,mprovenezt projects under FAAP, AnaP and the State of Cali forms CRAP' programs. He represents the County with respect to aviation matters i and serves as Secretary to the Coags Costa County Aviation Liaison Comz3ttee. He has been Secretary Treasurer and President of the California Association of Airport Mocutives, Inc. In 1971 Hr. Scott was awarded a certificate from the Uxdve►rsity of Ca3.ifornia for having completed ten years of Airport Management Short Courses iddch 4nc3,n ad Airport Planning, Safety, and Property Management. Be holds a Coceercial F lots License with Single and Multi f Engine Land and Sea ratings and also has a Control Tosser Operator Certificate. i October 2. 1975 OOC129 Supervising Real Property Agent Alfred J. Accurso B.A. Degree - Business, San Jose State College, 1957, major in Real Estate. Post graduate courses in Real Estate and Real Estate Appraisal -courses , at Diablo Valley College, University of California Extension and.from American Institute of Real Estate Appraiser (M.A.I. courses). i Mr. Accurso is the Supervising Real. Property Agent of the Real Property Division of Contra Costa County Pu61ic Works Department. His major function is to coordinate and oversee the work activities of- the Real Property staff i under the administration and direction of the Principal Real Property Agent. These--activities cover the basic areas of appraisal , acquisition and property i management (rental, leasing and disposal) for various County purposes such as. i roads, flood control, special districts, airport, Civic Center and office space projects. He assists the Principal Real Property Agent in developing and implementing Real Property operational policies and procedures. i i In addition, Mr_ Accurso assists the Principal Real Property Agent in handling ' the more critical or complex Real Property activities, including but not limited to;� 1. Acquisition of property rights for airport uses, protection and approaches. 2. Development and leasing of airport property for aviation and non-aviation uses. 3. Issuance of various entitlements (grants, easements, rights of entry, etc.) for necessary utility installations and rights of Way. 4. Disposal of excess airport and other lands by sale or exchange. Prior to consolidation of the Count Flood Control District with the County Y Public Works Department, Mr. Accurso headed the Flood Control District Right of Way Department and was responsible for its administration and operation for five years. Additionally, Mr_ Accurso spent 1-1/2 years as an appraiser with Contra Costa County Assessor's office. f 00` 30 k i ,,.. ., Assistant Civil Engineer - Francis B. - C. Lee Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, San Jose State Un yversity January, 1972- Master of Science, Civil Engineering, Major in Transportatidn, Minor in Urban Geography. San Jose State University, January., 1973 - Mr. Lee is an assistant civil engineer with the Road Design Division of the Contra Costa County Public Works. Department. - His present function is to serve as assistant to the Miscellaneous Projects squad leader. Duties have included the design and prep- aration of plans -and specifications for minor engineering projects . Flexible pavement design for conventional structural section, full - depth asphalt concrete design and utilization of flexible pavement deflection test data for preventative maintenance of roadways. Curb graides determination and minor storm drain layout procedures. Prior construction experience has included resident engineer :nvlovement on a reinforced concrete retaining wall , reinforced concrete road bridge widening and a road reconstruction project . r Mr. Lie has also been employed in the Transportation , Planning and \ Coordination Division where duties had included the analysis o V traffic generators and transportation. requirements to meet the needs of new development in the County, together with the preparation of related plans and reports. He was also involved in the preparation of study recommendations for- projected traffic analysis by consultants. Further activities included the provision of back- ground material on traffic generation and evaluation for Environ- mental Impact Reports by County Planning Staff_ In this capacity he has also conducted a localized traffic network study for the Road Design Division utilizing the County's adaptation of a traffic network computer program_ 1 . 10-7-75 00331 iC 4 u i i Associate civil Engineer - Robert D. Agnew Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineer, Chico State College, 1960; Registered Professional Engineer (Civil ) in State of Cal,ifo_rnia, No. C-16062, and in Oregon (Civil ) No. 6039- : Mr. Agnew was recently assigned as a squad leader for the Miscel - laneous Projects section of the Contra Costa County Public Works Road Design- Division. The miscellaneous project squad is respon- Bible for preparing plans and sp#.cifications for minor projects , railroad crossings and for projects in Contra- Costa County Buchanan Field'- Airport..: In conjunction with Land Development Division of the' Public Works Department , this section provides road frontage improvement grades for existing roads affected by contiguous property proposed for development . From 1961 to 1975 Mr. Agnew worked for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Mater Conservation District , experiences are as follows: 1973 to 1975, Associate Hydraulic Engineer , Flood Control Plan- ' ning Division, Subdivision Review Department. In charge of three subordinate engineers in providing drainage recommendation and improvement plan review with respect to drainage for proposed residential and commercial developments_ 1972 to 1973, Assistant Hydraulic Engineer, Subdivision Review_ 1963 to 1973 , Assistant Hydraulic Engineer, Flood Control Design Division. Mr. Agnew' s background includes responsibility of directing subordinate engineers in layout , design, preparation of plans and specifications of flood control channel improvements , and storm drainage systems . He was responsible for checking drawings submitted by other agencies , responsible for reviewing plans and specifications of channel projects in Contra. Costa County by Federal , County and city agencies. He prepared utility relocations , right of way drawings , design alternates , cost estimates , and fiscal budget estimates. He also was resident engineer for several storm drainage projects. 1961 to 1963 , Junior Civil Engineer , Flood Control Design Division. fir. Agnew was an assistant to project engineer in preparation of pians and specifications of flood control channels and storm drainage projects . r - 10-7-75 f _ OLS��2 • DEPA6RIMENT OF TRaNSPOitTATtt EDERAL AVIATION ADxlNISTRATIoN PART V ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby ares and certifies that he will amply with the regulations,policies including OMS Circulars Nos. A-87. A-95 and 9i'idelines. and requirements for this Federate assisted A l� Y relate to the application. acceptance and use of Federal funds Y project Also the Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: iii 49*- pl ans and specifications O*s Cxrox"i�.. x Ne "3 ut 1 1 I �y County by Federal , County and city agencies. He prepared relocations , right of way drawings , design alternates , cost estimates , and fiscal budget estimates. He also was resident engineer for several storm drainage projects . 1961 to 1963, Junior Civil Engineer , Flood Control Design Division. fir. Agnew was an assistant to project engineer in preparation of plans and specifications of flood control channels and storm drainage projects . 10-7-75 X32 ,a w ' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIEDERAt AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PART V l ASSURANCES - The Applicant hereby assures and certifies that he will comply with the regulations, policies,guidelines, and requirements including(}MB Circulars Nos. A$7.A-95.and A-102, as they relate to the application. and use of Federal funds for this Federally assisted projetL.Also the Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: ' 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant:that a 4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions resolution„ motion or similar action has been duly of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property adopted or passed as an official act of ttr_ applicant's Acquisitions Act of 1970(P.t. 91=646) which provides governing body,authorizing the filing of the application, for fair and equitable treatment of persons�displaced as a including all understandings and assurances contained result of Federal and federally assisted programs. I therein. and directing and authorizing the person identi- 5- it will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act fled as the official representative of the applicant to act which limit the political activity of employees. in connection with the application and to provide such: &. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum additional information as may be required hours provisions of the Federal Fair labor Standards 2 1t wall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of �' as they apply to hospital and educational institu. 1964 (P.l_. 88-352) and in accordance with Title VI of tion employees of State and local government that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the 7. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from ground of race, color. or national origin, be excluded using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the from participation in, be denied the benefits of.or be appearance Of being motivated by a desire for private Otherwise subjected to discrimination under any pro. gain for themselves or others, particularly those with gram or activity for which the applicant receives Federal whore they have family,business,or other ties. . financial assistance and will immediately take any mea- 8- It will give the grantor agency or the Comptroller Gen- sura necessaryto effectuate this agreement. eral through any authorized representative the access to and the right to examine all records, books,papers,or 3- it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of documents related to the grant. 1964 (42 USC 20DDd)prohibiting employment discrimi- 9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the / nation where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to Federal grantor agency concerning special requirement provide employment or (2) discriminatory employment Of law, program requirements, and other administrative practices will result in unequal treatment of persons who requirements approved in accordance with Office of are or should be benefiting from the grant-aided activity. Management and Budget Circular No.A-102. 1 FAA F—m5IM101 (6,73) SUPERSEOES FAA FORM saiSO-t ANO sago-t pMW5 cra •ss..ea DEPARIIAEril or TRAr4SPORIA.710N FtDEhAL AVIATION ADMINIS"r- STANDARD DOT TITLE VI ASSURICES (FOR ME WITH PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION) " County of Contra Costa, The business enterprises will be afforded full -,-� California tunity to submit bids in response to this invitatiot (hereinafter referred to as the"Sponsor")HEREBY AGREES and will not be discriminated against on THAT as a condition to receiving any Federal fuuncial assist_ grounds of race, color, or national origin ance from the Department of Transportation.it will comply consideration for an award. with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1963.78 Stat.252.42 U.S.C.2000d42 U.S.C.2000d4(hereinafter referred to as the 3. That the Sponsor shall insert,the clauses of Appends Act).and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Tide 49. A of this assurance in every contract subject to the Act i Code of Federal Regulations. Department of Transportation. the-Regulations. Subtitle A.Office of the Secretary.Part 21.Nondiscrimination t in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of, 4. That this assurance obligateis the Sponsor for Transportation—Effectuation of Tide VI of the Civil Rights period during which Federal financial assistance is extended ' Act of 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations)and the program. other pertinent directives, to the end that in accordance with -the Act. Regulations,and other pertinent directives,no person S. The Sponsor shall provide for such methods in the United States shall. on the grounds of race, color. or administration for the program as are found by the Secretar national origin. be excluded from participation in.be denied of Transportation or the official to whom he delegates spec the benefits of. or be otherwise subjected to discrimination authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other Spon:_ under any program or activity for which the sponsor receives subgrantees, contractors, subcontractors. .transferee. Federal financial assistance from the Department of Trans- successors in interest, and other participants of Feder portation.including the Federal Aviation Administration.and financial assistance under such program will comply with HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will promptly take requirements imposed or pursuant to the Act,the Regulation! any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement. This and this assurance. assurance is required by subsection 21.7(a)(I)of the Regula- tions. 6. 'The Sponsor agrees that the United States has a nigh' to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter:) More specifically and without limiting the above general under the Act,the Regulations.and this assurance. assurance. the Sponsor hereby gives the following specific as- surances with respect to its Planning Gant Program. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans 1. That the Sponsor agrees that each "program," as contracts.property,discounts or other Federal financial assist defined in subsections 21.23(e) and 21.23(b) of the Regula- ance extended after the date hereof to the Sponsor by the tions. will be (with regard to a "program) conducted in Department of Transportation under the Planning Grant Pro compliance with all requirements imposed by. or pursuant to. germ and is binding on it, other recipients, subgrantees the Regulations. contractors, subcontractors. transferees,successors in interesi and other participants in the Planning Grant Program. Thi 2. That the Sponsor shall insert the following notifca- person or persons whose signatures appear below are au tion in all solicitations for bids for work or material subject to thorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Sponsor. the Regulations and made in connection with all Planning, Grant Program and. in adapted form. in all proposals for negotiated agreements: �— DATED Cts fs`' i 7 5 The Sponsor. in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.78 StaL 252.42 U.S.C_ County of Contra Costa, Calif. 2000d to 2000d4 and Title 49.Code of Federal (Sponsor) Regulations. Department of Transportation. Subtitle A. Office of the Secretary.Part 21.Non- by 3,j discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of (Signature of Authorized-Official) the Department of Transportation issued pursuant to such Act,hereby notifies all bidd_rs that it will affirmatively insure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority FAA Form 590043 13.72) SEE APPENDIX A ON REVERS 0f 10 134 �:u f y APPENDIX A During tilt perfurrtunce of this contract. the contractor. for pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations. 1 itself, its assignccs and successors in interest (hereinafter orders and instructions.Where any information required of !erred to as the"contractor")agrees as follows: contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who f,- Of or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall (1) Compliance with Regulations: The eorttractor shall certify to the Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration i comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in as appropriate,and shall set forth what efforts it has made Federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transporta• obtain the information. tion (hereinafter, "DOT') Tide 49, Code of Federal Regula- tions. Pan 21,as they may be amended from time to time. (5) Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of ! (hereinafter referred to as the Regubtions),which are herein contractors noncompliance with the nondiscrimination incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. provisions of this contract, the (Sponsor) shall impose sue'_ contract sanctions as it or the Federal Aviation Administratior (3) Nondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to may determine to be appropriate, including, but not limiter the work performed by it during the contract, shall not to: discriminate on the grounds of race.color.or national origin in a the selection and retention of subcontractors, including (a) withholding of payments to the contractor undo_ procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The the contract until the contractor complies.and/or contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by section 21.5 of the Regula- (b) cancellation, termination or suspension of tions. contract,in whole or in part. (3) Solicitations for Subcontracts, lncludi!j Procure- (6) Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor -L ! menu of Materials and u' ment: In all solicitations either include the provisions of paragraphs(1) through (6) in eve,_ by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor subcontract,including procurements of materials and leases for work to be performed under a subcontract, including equipment, unless exempted by the Regulations or directive. procurements of materials or Leases of equipment. each issued pursuant thereto.The contractor shall take such ae'-- ! potential subcontractor of supplier shall be notified by the with respect to any subcontract or procurement, as -` �• .-ontractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration may direct - and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions `- grounds of race,color,or national origin- non-compliance: Provided. however, that in the event = contractor becomes involved in or is threatened with litigatior. (4) Information and Reports: The contractor shall with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction + provide all information and reports required by the Regula- the contractor may request the Sponsor to enter into sud. tions or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit litigation to protect the interests of the Sponsor, and,in ad ' access to its books. records. accounts. other sources of dition,the contractor may request the United Sptes to enter information, and its facilities as may be determined by the into such litigation to protect the interests of the Unites + Sponsor or the Federal Aviation Administration to be motes- Oro 925-99: 0023 15 ,rz ... I • vicTOR w. sAusR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENITO R, 0. BROATCH ruauc wwws 01.ccTDn CONTRA CESTA COUNTY Deft"T•USINtas AND srwrltcs Caul 372-2402 /cul a77slos VERNON L. CLINE .TM YLOO., �arM,Is7.ATICIN sumo/Nt: R. M_ RYC:H uc• ac►UTt w.LIC wtsmts D4ftx=au DL►uTY..U1L01NGA ANO CROUNDZ 44131 372auu MAATtNLZ. CALIFORNIA 94053 RoO&$ ns. COURTNOUs4 gals) 373.22110 MARK L. KERMIT DCruTY.Twuts"ONTATSO" October 2, 1975 J. L. TAYLOR 44131 a7iQICi: 0[rt1TY.0r[RATION.AND/LOOD CONTROL 202 GLACIER DRIV[ ,I C1gl Y1i•447O I I I • 1 Mr. Frederick M. Isaac, Chief Airport DLtrict: Of:Mce - Federal Aviation Adainistratioa 831 Mitten Road _ Burling CA 9W.10 Dear Mr. Isaac: Reanest for Force► Account Credit Baring the 2faster Plan Study for Buchanan Field, Contra Costs j County proposes to provide force account assistance to the consultant I through services of the Public Works Department. It is requested that ! $4,000 of the total project cast be allocated to force account activities on the part of the County as follows: _ Work Element Title Aonrs Rate Total 1 A did mi motive Airport: Manager 170 $13.68 $28326 . y Clerical So 6.84 342 E7ament 13 Engineer 30 13.73 412 Real Property Agent 30 15.28 458 �= Expense $ 462 $4,000 4 County participation vlll primarily involve project adadnistration and cost estimation. The County gill review the project on a continuing basis and provide the consultant with information on land acquisition and unit costs as outlined in Element 13 of the prograa narrative. Resumes of County personnel who %.-_13 be participating in the study are enclosed. Very truly Yours, 1 Victor W. Saner Public Works Director I • Marvin E. Scott Airport Manager MES:qP1 Enc. 00235 PART IV PROGRAM NARRATIVE FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN AIRPORT MASTER PLAN BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT - CONCORD Contra Costa County, California INTRODUCTION . Buchanan Field Airport is located north of the City of Concord, California. The Airport is owned and operated by Contra Costa County and provides general aviation services to the residents of Concord, as well as to people in Contra Costa County re- siding outside the City of Concord. The principal goal of this Master Plan Study is to prepare short-, intermediate-, and long-range (5-, 10-, and 20-year plans of development for Buchanan Field Airport. The study will update and incorporate all pertinent data developed as a part of the Contra Costa County Airport Site Selection Study. The study will be structured so as to take the aforementioned County-wide data and focus the analysis on the specific needs of Buchanan Field_ Within the overall Master Plan Study, special emphasis will be placed on the following areas of concern: o The capacity of the Airport, both operationally and in terms of the number of based aircraft which it can be expected to accommodate. o The location and disposition of existing airport property which is excess to aviation needs. o The requirement for additional land acquisition to protect the Airport and its approaches from incom- patible development. -1- 0011 o The formulation of a sound policy towards the development of the Airport's west side. This will include an evaluation of accessibility and the optimal use of available land. o The evaluation of financial/lease policies to insure a sound fiscal-and operational develop- ment program. - Accepted and tested standards for airport planning and design have been developed by the Federal Aviation Administration.`. These standards have, in the past, been periodically reviewed and adjusted to provide for technological developments. The current standards will be utilized within the study. The Study will meet the requirements established in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5070-6. . i PHASE I Element l - Study Design Included in the Study Design will be the identification of study issues that warrant special and/or priority considera- tion and a description of the manner and sequence in which these matters will be addressed_ The allocation of work effort between the Consultant and the Sponsor will also be defined within this element. The Consultant will prepare a draft work scope and submit same to the Contra Costa County Public Works Department for its re- ,view. This draft will be modified as required prior to its submittal to the FAA and appropriate A•-95 agencies. The Con- sultant will attend a preapplication conference, the purpose of which will be to finalize the work scope. Once the work -2- 0033S scope has been finalized, the Consultant will prepare a study schedule and budget for County approval. The Consultant will -i _-.L.L1 ..1.iV L..: LiCllillt:(i within this element_ The Consultant will prepare a draft work scope and submit wine to the Contra Costa County Public Works Department for its re- view. This draft will be modified as required prior to its submittal to the FAA and appropriate A-95 agencies. The Con- sultant will attend area lication conferenceth ' p pp , e purpose of which will be to finalize the work scope_ Once the work -2- 00338 scope has been finalized, the Consultant will prepare a study schedule and budget for County approval. The Consultant will then assist the County in the preparation of exhibits and com- pletion of the Planning Grant Application. ' Element 2 - Facility Inventory and Statistical Review As a base for the systematic development of a Master Plan for Buchanan Field Airport, an inventory and review of existing studies and plans concerning -the-Airport, as well._as known ' factors that have and could affect the development of the Air- port, will be made_ Elements to be included in this inventory ' and review include: i I A. Historical Review of Airport The history of the airport's ownership, statutory author- i l ity, and overall development will be reviewed and presented in a brief narrative_ I B. Airport Plans and Studies The Airport's existing plans and previous studies, pre- pared in connection with the development of the Airport, will be reviewed and, where applicable, incorporated in the development of the Master Plan. Specific review of I those elements of the Contra Costa County Site Selection Study which are pertinent to Buchanan Field Airport will ' be an important consideration within this element_ C_ Existing Facilities The airport inventory will include a review of existing, in-place facilities as thLy relate to the determination of future airport requirements_ Existing facilities will be shown on a base map and described in narrative_ I I -3- 00'Q39 I I D. Airport Activity (Update Site Selection Study) The airport's traffic activity of record will be pre- seated in definitive tables and will include aircraft + (general aviation, commercial, instrument, and visual), ., , operations, based aircraft, and enplaned commuter pas- sengers_ Special emphasip will be placed on the rela- tive sophistication of the based aircraft mix and asso- ciated economic impacts_ r £."- Airport User Survey - - - "A`-representative survey of airport users will be con- ducted to determine the airport's area of influence, air- port access requirements, and the impact of future develop- ment on airport activity_ £. Airspace and Navaids (Update Site Selection Study) Preliminary investigation of the airspace use, airways, 1 control zones and transition areas, and existing obstruc- tions will- be made. Air navigational aids and aviation communication facilities will be inventoried. G. Airport Land Use A review of existing land uses on the Airport will be made. This data will include descriptions of the cur- ' rent land uses and drawing(s) depicting their location on the Airport. H. Nearby Airport Master Plans A review of the most recent planning efforts at Napa County, Livermore, Hayward, and Oakland International ! airports will be conducted to determine the impact of future development on aviation activity At Buchanan Field_ -4- opy"10 1 I_ Existing Areawide Plans and Studies (Update Site Selection Study) A review of available plans, studies, and forecasts pre- pared by local, regional, and state planning agencies. will be made specifically considering the relationship between the airport's development and the existing and planned land uses, i.e., -residential, highways, schools, hospitals, recreational areas, utilities, and similar elements. J. - haws and Ordinances (Update Site Selection Study) A review will be made of existing local and state zoning laws and other regulations and ordinances to determine those laws that would substantially affect the master plan- ning program_ The Consultant will additionally gather and review pertinent Federal legislation and regulations and determine their effect on the planning program. K_ Review of the Airport's Current Financial Position A review of the Airport's current financial position will be made considering the County's current airport lease agreement policy for each major income area and how such policy affects the Airport's financial position_ This review will determine the fiscal capacity of the Airport for future development. Element 3 - Aviation Demand Forecasts i Aviation demand forecasts will be developed for Buchanan Field. + A major portion of this work will involve a review of the fore- casts developed for the Contra Costa County Site Selection Study and the Federal Aviation Administration publication Terminal + Area Forecasts. Using the data from these studies, the Con- sultant will make appropriate revisions based on more current � t � i socioeconomic and/or airport activity level data within the Buchanan Field Air Trade Area. The short-, intermediate-, and long-range (5-, 10-, and. 20-year) aviation demand forecasts will include: A. Aircraft operations (sch9duled air taxi, general -avia- i tion -- local and itinerant) . B_ `Busy-hour aircraft operations. C. instrument approaches and operations. D. Based aircraft (including mix) . E. Surface vehicular activity. Element 4 - Demand/Capacity Analysis •r Having assessed existing and potential future demand for air transportation services and facilities at the Airport, the capacity of the airfield and airport access systems will be determined. A. The capacity analysis will consider all runways and taxi- ways in the airfield complex. The capacity of the air- field, normally expressed in annual and hourly numbers of aircraft operations, will be determined. The accept- ance rate will be determined for visual and instrument conditions. The capacity analysis outlined in the Site Selection Study will be reviewed and refined based on procedures presently being developed under a Federal Avaition Administration research program. Methods of increasing airfield capacity, e.g., restrictions on touch- and-go traffic, disincentives to peak-hour usage, etc_, - I -6- 0 will be explored. Qualitative costs and benefits i associated with these methods will be presented and recommendations made_ B. The capacity of the Airport to support based aircraft: will be determined with consideration given to 1) the physical capacity of the airport property to accommo- date aircraft and 2) the number of based aircraft that . can be expected to generate operations in excess of the airfield capacity_ - --" c_ The airport access and internal roadway system will be analyzed in terms of numbers of vehicles it is capable of handling by daily and hourly intervals. Roadway capacity will be based on analysis procedures contained in the Highway Research Board Special Report No. 87, l Highway capacity Manual. Element 5 = Facility Requirements Determination A. Determination of Airfield Requirements From the foregoing forecast demand/capacity relationship, a determination of airfield requirements will be made. Analysis will enable planning for maximum existing air- field utilization, as well as necessary future develop- ment. 1_ Runways: number, length, strength, width, clear- ances, clear zones, separation, approach slopes, configuration, alignment, and grade. i 1 2. Taxiways: width, clearances, and location. - i -7- 0 W343 3. Lighting and marking: ' approaches, runways, and taxiways. meat. 1. Runways: number, length, strength, width, clear- ances, clear zones, separation, approach slopes, f configuration, alignment, and grade. E 2. Taxiways: width, clearances, and location_ i I -7- 001343 3. Lighting and marking: " approaches, runways, and taxiways. 4. Navaids: type and location. Specific attention will be directed toward the requirement for and benefits to be derived from the proposed Instru- ment Landing System '(ILS) for Runway 19R. A computerized meteorological analysis of a five-year period of weather.observations will be conducted_ Wind direction and speed will be related to the ceiling and visibility conditions for each recorded observation. This analysis will assist in the determination of poten- tial noise abatement procedures and the cost effective- ness of alternative navigational aid configurations. Specifically, existing approach minimums and proposed ILS minimums will be incorporated into the computer analysis to determine increased benefits_ B. Determination of Airport Access Requirements Existing and proposed on-airport access roads and on- airport parking facilities will be reviewed and developed in terms of total airport development requirements as. determined in the demand/capacity analysis_ The require- ments for on--airport access development essential to meet the forecast demands will then be ,identified_ Specific attention will be directed to the question of providing access to the west side of the Airport adequate to accom- modate projected development within that area. C. Determination of General Aviation Requirements Those facilities required specifically to accommodate general aviation activity through the forecast period OOk.?44 i i r I will be determined. The evaluation will include: i I1. Based aircraft tie-downs 2. Transient aircraft tie-downs 3. Hangar storage 1 4. Fixed base operator acreage S. Automobile parking. i Element -6 = Environmental Study 1 An environmental impact assessment discussing both positive and negative impacts and following the guidelines of the Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration Order 5050.2A, 1 "Interim Instructions for Processing Airport Development Actions Affecting the Environment", will be prepared. The assessment will address the impact of new airport facilities proposed as a re- sult of the master plan study and of altered airport operations recommended in the study. Particular attention will be directed to the following issues. A. Displacement and relocation of people. B. Aesthetic/visual consequences. C_ Impacts on surrounding communities and on existing land uses. D. Impacts on areas of unique interest and/or scenic I beauty. E. Impacts on any important arecreational areas. -9- a 0034 1 •• + F. Ecological impacts. G_ Air and water quality aspects. 1 H. Hydrologic impacts_ PHASE II Element 7 - Site Selection There are to be no services provided under this master plan element. I !� PHASE III 1 j Element 8 = Airport Layout Plan The recently adopted Airport Layout Plan will be reviewed and revised to reflect recommendations of this study. Drawings and tables will be prepared including the airport layout, a location map, a vicinity map, approach and clear zone plans showing all imaginary surfaces, a basic data table, and all- weather wind rose, and an IFR wind rose. The airport layout drawing items shall meet or exceed minimum FAA standards, shall be prepared in accordance with FAA guide- lines contained in Advisory Circular 150/5070-6, and will in- clude the following items: J A. Runways, taxiways, aprons, stabilized shoulders, and ex- tended runway safety areas, buildings, navaids, parking areas, roads, lighting, runway marking, pipelines, fences, major drainage facilities, segmented circle, wind indi- cators, and beacon. f ' -10- 0G?4 S 1 i ti e..y9 B. Natural and man-made features (e-g. , trees, streams, i canals,.ponds, rock outcrops, ditches, powerlines, and towers) . G. Revenue producing, nonaviation related property, surplus or otherwise, designating current status and use. D. Areas reserved for existing and planned aviation develop- ment and services_ E. ,Areas reserved for nonaviation development. t F. Existing ground contours from available sources. G. Fueling facilities (bulk storage) . H_ General aviation aircraft storage areas_ f ' 1 I_ Facilities to be phased out_ J. Airport boundaries and areas owned or controlled by the Airport showing aviation easements_ K. Outlined approach and clear zones with height and location of controlling objects shown_ L, Airport reference points with latitudes and longitudes given based on U.S. Geological Survey grid system- 24. Elevation of runway ends, high and low points, and runway intersections. For ILS runways, changes in elevation within 3,000 feet outward of the runway threshold. R_ True azimuth of runways, north point, true and magnetic, with the magnetic declination. i -ll- V VM7 F a I t { . . n a.ry O_ pertinent dimensional data for runway and taxiway widths and runway lengths, taxiway/runway/apron clear- ances, apron dimensions, building clearance lines, clear zones, and parallel runway separation_ I Element 9 - Airport Land Use Plan 1 r 1 A. on-Airport band Use i The-Airport Land Use Plan will •show existing and recommended future land use on all airport property. This plan will il-- # lustrate the areas set aside for general aviation facilities, , the building area complex, commercial/industrial development, i airport access, buffer zones, recreational sites, the loca- tion of navigational aids, and other improvements that are recommended. The plan will also illustrate any restrictions I or special purpose usage of specific areas due to continuing obligations to the United States. General recommendations as to the compatible use of airport ! property excess to aviation requirements will be developed i and criteria for evaluating specific use proposals will be presented_ i B. off-Airport Land Use 1_ Height limitations in the vicinity of the Airport will be recommended using, as a minimum, Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77, "Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace". These limitations will be discussed in narrative and depicted on the Approach and Clear Zone Plan_ 2_ Ultimate projected Community Noise Equivalent Level WNEL) contours will be developed for levels of 60 s i t t . Field studies will be conducted to 65 _ and rt related) noise levels ,deter ne dent. (nonairpo will ASA.ij Vi a.i3C' A2 be recommended using, rport as a minimum, Federal Aviation Regulations part 7? i Navigable Airspace'. Objects Affecting These limitations will be discussed in narrative and depicted Zone Plan- Ultimate P cted on the Approach and Cl + lam_ I+ 2- Ultimate projected 1 tCNEL Community raise contours Equivalent Level will be develoQed for levels of 60 -12- . 4 and 65 dbA, Field studies will be conducted to determine ambient (nonairport-related) noise levels within the airport environs. Noise monitoring of aircraft will also be conducted to Proportioni and verify the C.NEL contours. This effort will more ' precisely determine actual noise levels within the airport environs and identify that segment of the noise which can be associated with aircraft acti- vitt'. Noise contours will also be developed based. on the Aircraft Sound Description Systeme (ASDS) . Within the ultimate 65-CNEL contour, general land use compatibility criteria based on the effect of aircraft noise will be presented. 3- The model airport zoning ordinance outlined in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5190-3A, "Model Airport Hazard { Zoning Ordinance", will be modified as appropriate } to Buchanan Field Airport and incorporated into the master plan study- Element 10 - Building Area Plan Building area plans will be developed which will include schematic drawings adequate for the delineation of basic flows of aircraft and vehicles. Those facilities that will be in- cluded, as required, in this plan are: A. Aircraft storage areas (hangars and tie-downs) - B. Fixed base operatigns. C. Automobile parking. D. Entrance and service roads. I -13-- f 0 W2 9 E_ -Nonaviation commercial land uses (motel, restaurant, etc.) . !F i v...aas.a..,1L..., . la.. cluded, as required, in this plan are: A. Aircraft storage areas (hangars and tie-downs) . B. Fixed base operations. C. Automobile park=ing. D. Entrance and service roads- -13- : L E. •Imonaviation commercial land uses (motel, restaurant, etc.) - F. tc.) -F_ other facilities, as required. Element 11 - Airport Access Plan ' Having determined the requirements for airport access, appropri- ate airport access plans will be prepared. Alternatives for providing access to the west side of the Airport will be devel- oped and the trade-offs between direct convenient routing and --the disruption of existing land uses, e.g. , golf course, will be identified. Based on this analysis, recommendations will:be made which minimize the adverse effects of providing Westside ' access. PHASE IV Element 12 Development of Staging Program Following the selection of the appropriate airfield, building area, and airport access development plans, staging recommenda- tions will be made for each basic element of the plan (i.e., runway/taxiway development, additions to the building area, access improvements, etc.) . The .Airport Master Plan drawings i and narrative will indicate and describe increments of improve- went/expansion for the short-, intermediate-, and long-range demand forecasts. Element 13 - Estimates of Development Costs 1 Estimated construction costs of in-place additions or improve- ments will be included in the Airport Master Plan report and will be developed for the various stages to accommodate the 1 -14- 00915 i I • t demand forecasts. Land acquisition item costs (developed by the County) , if any, will be included in the report. All cost estimates will be in current dollars. The County will provide unit costs to the Consultant for use in preparing con- struction costs. Element 14 - Economic Feasibility and Financing Plan To the extent that historical financial information is avail- able, a historical financial analysis will be undertaken for each major airport cost area. Based upon this information, as well as the aviation forecasts set forth in the Airport Master Plan report, financial projections will be made for the ensuing ten-year period to ascertain whether net revenues from each major cost area and the Airport as a whole will be sufficient to cover the cost of the proposed capital improvements. Once the projected financing capabilities of the Airport have been determined, the Consultant will analyze various financing plans, i.e. , general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, private financing, revenue financing, or combinations of these basic alternatives. Appropriate recommendations will be made. Recommendations will be made as to lease agreement policy for each major source of Airport income in order that future devel- opment of the Airport will be predicated on a sound fiscal and operational basis. In developing such a policy for T-hangars, fixed base operator areas, transient and permanent tie-downs, and nonaviation areas, where applicable, consideration will be given to: A. Term jB. Privileges and rights i C. Rates and charges r -15- 00*251 i t D. Maintenance and operational obligations E. Insurance F_ Minimum standards (e.g.,* plot size) G. Utilities H. Assignment and subletting, GENERAL SERVICES A_ Public Informational Meetings The Consultant will participate in up to three (3) public informational meetings and will furnish any necessary data and exhibits that have been prepared as part of the plan- ning program. The timing of these informational meetings shall approxi- mate the conclusion of Phases I, II, and IV, as outlined in the program narrative_ i S. Printing of Report . A preliminary draft of the report will be provided at the conclusion of the study for review by the designated Sponsor Representatives and the Federal Aviation Administration. Subsequent to this review, fifty (50) printed copies of the i i final Master Plan Report will be provided_ Additionally, one hundred (100) copies of the Introduction, Conclusions, Summary Recommendations, and reduced Airport Layout Plan will be provided_ f C_ Administration i The Consultant will prepare the required monthly project 1 status reports and coordinate study elements with the t appropriate agencies_ -16- tj _U 1 1 D. Additional Services Services required beyond the scope of the contract or after final presentation of the report are available. Terms of such services are subject to mutual agreement of both parties. . GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Coordination i As the planning progresses,- full coordination will be 1 maintained with Contra Costa County and other area agen- cies as required by the study. The Consultant will co- ordinate with the appropriate and jurisdictional offices . and personnel of the Federal Aviation Administration and the California Department of Transportation on matters in their area of interest during the study. The County will solicit the participation of representa- tives from communities neighboring the Airport (e.g. , i the cities of Concord and Pleasant Hill) . This participa- tion may include (not necessarily limited to) attendance iat the aforementioned informational meetings and review ! of the draft report. B. Designation of Sponsor Representative in order to expedite the undertaking of work outlined herein and permit the correlation of data and materials, plans, commitments, and correspondence, the County will designate one representative who shall act as its repre- sentative to whom all correspondence, materials, plans requests for conferences, and other similar data will be fully informed regarding the work, and to cooperate with the County in coordinating 'the work and resolving all ! ! matters related to the conclusions and procedures, under- takings, work schedule, and other actions prior to the final submission of reports set forth above. -17- 00753 C. Independent Contractor obligation The Consultant shall be an independent contractor under this agreement and shall assume all of the rights, obli- i gations, and liabilities applicable to him as such inde- pendent contractor hereunder, and any provisions in this agreement which may appe4r to give the County the-right to direct the Consultant:as to the details of doing the work shall be deemed to mean the Consultant shall follow the desires of the C-ity- �e results of work only. I D_ Time I I The study will be completed within twelve (12) months from receipt of notice to proceed. No work beyond the preparation and submittal of the Planning Grant Appli- cation shall be accomplished by the Consultant under this agreement unless and until all procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration Planning Grant Pro- gram have been met and a grant agreement has been com- pleted for this study between the Federal Aviation Admini- stration and Contra Costa County. E. Compliance with Applicable Law The Consultant shall comply with any and all local, State, and Federal laws regarding age, citizenship, hours, wages, I and conditions of employment affecting the services covered by this agreement; and the Consultant shall pay the con- tributions measured by wages of his employees required by the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, the Federal Insurance Contribution Act, and any other payroll tax. JF. Termination for Convenience -of County The County has the right of cancellation on thirty (30) I days notice in writing from the County to the Consultant; 1 such notice to be forwarded by certified mail. The Consultant shall be paid for fees and time expended up to the date of cancellation. After final payment of all fees and expenses, the County shall receive copies of all work performed to date, including calculations, data, narratives, and drawings. Such data shall be, at that time, the property of the County. G. Records All financial records pertaining to the Planning Project shall be made available to authorized representatives of the Federal Aviation Administration and the Comptroller * General of the United States in conformity to regulations. H. Copyright and Proprietary Ownership All published material such as reports, maps, and other documents prepared in connection with the Planning Proj- ect and planning work activity shall contain a standard notice that the material was prepared under an Airport Master Planning Grant provided by the Federal Aviation Administration. The County shall make these documents available for examination by the public_ In addition, no material prepared In connection with the Planning Proj- ect and other planning work activity shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other country. The Federal Aviation Administration shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data, or other materials prepared with Airport Planning Grant Funds. I. CRA Assurance The Consultant agrees to conduct the Planning Project incompliance with all the requirements imposed by or -19- 1 i k- r.; t pursuant to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and by Part 21 of the Regulations of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation, as amended. J. Federal Aviation AaminIstration Obligation , In the execution of the Master Planning Grant .Applica- tion, the Federal Aviation Administration assumes no obligation to the Consultant. 8. Certification :. The Consultant certifies that no individuals or group of individuals other than bona fide employees were utilized in securing this Master Planning Grant. L. Understanding of Grant Agreement The Consultant is familiar with all the terms and con- ditions of the Grant Application and will familiarize himself with all Grant Agreement documents_ x. Production Schedule and Travel The production schedule and related trips for under- taking the services set forth herein will be at the discretion of the Consultant, but the Consultant will attempt to coordinate all visits to include any special conferences or meetings desired by the County. N. Project Delays Should any delays in the performance of the project be incurred as a result of actions by Contra Costa County or the Federal Aviation Administration, the Consultant's obligation for project completion shall be extended by an amount of time equal to the delays. i -20- I r F 0. .contracting I With the exception of 8hvironm,ntal Science Associates, - ' the Consultant x171 not snbcoutract for services set forth herein Without the Written consent of the County. The Consultant shall insert in each subcontract approp-" I priate provisions requiring compliance with the labor standards provisions set forth-herein. IP. Pay=ent The fee for services as set forth herein shall be on a - hasp sum basis not to exceed $41.000. Partial payments shill be made monthly inthin thirty (30) days upon receipt I of statement from the Consultant. Final payment will be subject to approval of the final report by the County. 1 1 G.i. r; THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF C0.TMA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Appeal of ) Danville Baptist Church } from Action of the Board ) of Appeals on Application ) February 3, 1976 No. 2081-75, San Ramon Area. } (Ms. L. 3tidger, Owner) ; The Board having heretofore fixed this date for decision on the appeal of Danville Baptist Church from Hoard of Appeals denial of the Church's appeal of Condition No. 14 imposed by the Board of Adjustment in connection with approval of Land Use Permit No. 2081-75 (to establish a church facility on land fronting the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately one and one-half miles southwest of Norris Canyon Road, San Ramon area; and Mr. N. L. Halverson of the Planning Department staff having reviewed the proposal; and Mr. J. M. Walford, Land Development Division, Public Works Department, having read a report from Mr. V. L. Cline, Chief Deputy Publia 'storks 3irector, commenting on excerpts of a 1973 traffic study of the area indicating a need for the proposed widening of San Ranson Valley Boulevard; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having stated that in view of the aforesaid report he would recommend that the appeal be denied; and Supervisor J. 3. Moriarty having suggested that Condition No. 14 be amended to indicate that the Church would not be required to start actual improvement work until such time as road construction is commenced bet-dean Hollinger Canyon Road and Alcosta Boulevard; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appeal of Danville Baptist Church is DMMM and the decision of the Hoard of Appeals is upheld with the clarification of Condition No. 14 suggested by Supervisor Moriarty. PAS39D by the Board on February 3, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed cc: Danville Baptist Church this 3rd day of February, 1976. Ms. Lorraine Stidger Director of PlarYaI g J. R. OLSSON, CIMM Public Works Director Flood Control District lassajara Fire Protection ,p ` District By of• Centra! Contra CO3 tocan Miller Sanitary District VDeputy Clerk 40 1 { BEFORE THE BOARD OF {APPEALS CONTRA COSTA.CUUM CALIF. In The flatter of Land Use Permit Application No. 2081-75, Danville Baptist Church. 4HEMki, on May 14, 1975, the Danville Baptist Church (Applicant), Lorrain Stidger (Owner), filed an application for a land use permit to establish a church facility; and WHEREAS, said application pertained to certain property located in the Danville area briefly described as being a descriptive parcel fronting 480± feet on the west. side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately % miles southwest of Norris Canyon Road and located in a General Agricultural District (A-2); and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing in this matter was duly given as required , by law; and WHEREAS, a public hearing in this matter was held by the Contra Costa County Board of Adjustment on Wednsday, September 3, 1975, whereat all persons interested there- in might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the matter having been submitted and tng board of Adjustment having fully considered the same as it restates to the health, sarety and general welfare of the County, the orderly development of land in the County, the preservation of property values, the effect upon the neighborhood, the effect upon the General Plan, and the special conditions applicable to the instant case; and WHEREAS;the board of adjustment APPROVED said application with 14 conditions attached thereto; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 1975, the applicant filed an appeal relative to con- dition #14 of the conditions imposed by the Board of Adjustment; and MiERLAS, after notice of appeal was lawfully given, a public hearing was held -by the Board of appeals on Tuesday, October 14, 1975, whereat all persons interested there- in might appear and be heard; and WHERci, the matter having been submitted and the Board of Appeals having fully considered the same as it relates to the health, safety and general walfare of the County, i the orderly development of land in the County, the preservation of property values, the l effect upon the nei5hborhoud, the effect upon the General Plan, and the special conditions applicable to the instant case; and I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLD that the board of Appeals DMIES the appeal of i M aofilmed with Eioard order a C Danville Baptist Church #208l-75 / the Danville baptist Churdi 12081-75, in that its approval would be deleterious to the objectives of the County Zoning Code and to the aforementioned considerations as well Ar fnr tho fnllr- irn r --n - ul t.iuu 1..14 u+ we caul dons imposed by the Board of Adjustment; and WHEREAS, after notice of appeal was lawfully given, a public hearing was held -by the Board of appeals on Tuesday. October 14, 1975, whereat all persons interested there- in might appear and be heard; and WHERcw, the matter having been submitted and the board of Appeals having fully considered the same as it relates to the health, safety and general rralfare of the County, the orderly development of land in the County, the preservation of property values, the effect upon the neiyliborhoud, the effect upon the General Plan, and the special conditions applicable to the instant case; and HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESuE%'ED that the board of Appeals DEITIES the appeal of Aft 9�171'9 Ncrofilmed with board order I Danville baptist Church #2081-75 / the Danville baptist Church #2081-75, in that its approval would be deleterious to the objectives of the County Zoning Code and to the aforementioned considerations as well as for the following reason: (1) Condition #14 is consistent with road widening requirements made on other projects in the area and in keeping with the adopted precise plan for road widening in this area. The foregoing order was given by vote of the Board of Appeals on Tuesday, October 14, 1975, in a regular weeting, as follows: AYES: Commissioners - Anderson, Walton, Jeha, Stoddard, Young. HUES: Commissioners - bone. AbSSENT: Commissioners - Compaglia, Milano. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - Hone. AIIDREW H. YOUNG Chairman of the Plamiing oamission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California DATE: November 5, 1975 ATTEST: An ny A. Ue aesu Secretary at the Contra ,---Costa County la ing Commission, California ( � -2- a f Planning Department Contra Costa County BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING Wednesday, September 3,' 1975 3,, DANVILLE BAPTIST CHURCH (Applicant) - LORRAINE STIDGER Owner) (A-2) (2081-75) This is a request to establish a church facility. The subject property fronts approximately 480' on the west side of San Ramon Valley Blvd., approx. 1-1/2 miles southwest of Norris Canyon Road, in the San Ramon area. This item was initially scheduled before the Board of Adjustment on July 16, 1975 and was rescheduled to August 6, 1975 to allow the applicant time to review the conditions of approval with the church board. The item was continued again, to this date, to allow the applicant the oppor- tunity to meet with staff and resolve certain problems related to the con- ditions of approval. A meeting was held on August 13, 1975 between the applicant and members of the staff. Several modifications to the conditions were agreed upon at the August 13 meeting and are incorporated in the conditions listed below. Staff recommends that this request be approved subject to the following: 1. Applicant shall submit revised plans, similar to those prepared by Planning staff, dated August 14, 1975 reflecting the suggested changes in building location and parking layout. 2. This permit will expire two (2) years from the effective date if the use allowed by this permit is not established within that time. 3. The seating capacity of the main assembly room of the church shall be a ' maximum of 2SO persons in this first phase. Sunday school activities are not included in this maximun. 4. No private school shall be operated on subject property with this permit, except typical Sunday School activities and limited summer Bible schools. S. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, elevations and architectural design of proposed buildings and structures shall be subject to final review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. The type and color of exterior materials for the roof and walls of all buildings and structures shall be indicated. The roofs and exterior walls of the proposed buildings shall be free of all objects; i.e. , T.Y. aerials, air conditioning units, water or electric meters, etc., or screened from view. 6. Comply with landscape and irrigation requirements, as follows: A. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the County Zoning Administrator. A cost estimate or copy of contract for landscaping improvements shall be submitted with the plan. Landscaping and irri- gation shall be installed prior to occupancy. Q0%931S1 Microfilmed with board order Danville Baptist Cliurcjl 2081-7S -2- Septa 3, 1975 B. Trees on the site shall be retained where , possible. - elevations and architectural of a and structures shall be subject to final S. prior to the issuancebuildings�ldrng Pett' -nistrator. The type and ' design of proposthe County Zoning Admi review and approval by proposed exterior materials for the roof and ldi exterior wallsof theeditlning color ur indicated. ' he roof air con structures shall be eels; i-e„ T.V. aerials, buildings shall be free of all objects;or screened from view- units, water or electric meters, follows' irrigation requirements, as 1 6• Comply with landscape and a landscape and irrigation permit, Zoning A. Prior to the issuance of a building n approval by the County A Lost estimate or copy of contract for landscaping plan shall be submitted for review an ap Landscaping and irri- Administrator. plan. Lan improvements shall besubmitted t occupancy• It installed 1 gation shall be ins 4 �r1 r MX=filmed wdh board order lot, Danville Baptist Church -2- Sept- 3, 1975 • 2081-75 B. Trees on the site shall be retained where possible. C. A landscape planting program shall be submitted for the areas along the property lines. D. Additional landscape planting shall be installed and maintained within- the ithinthe setback areas. E. Provide additional landscape planting, masonry wall or heavy wood fence or a combination of both to obscure the view of parking from the adjacent properties at the north property lines. Thd'above screening shall be in- stalled within six months of building occupancy. F. If occupancy is requested prior to the installation.of the landscape and irrigation improvements, then either: (1) a cash deposit; (2) a bond; or (3) a letter of credit, shall be delivered to the County for 100 percent of the estimated cost of the uncompleted portion of the landcape and irrigation improvements. If compliance is not achieved after six months of occupancy as determined by the County Zoning Administrator, the County shall contract for the completion of the landscaping and irrigation improvements to be paid for by -- the held sum. The County shall return the unused portion within one year of receipt or at the completion of all work. 7. Parkins and driveway areas shall be paved so as to prevent dust and ponding of water. Parking and dimensional requirements for parking shall comply with the County parking Ordinance. S. No signs shall be permitted other than a sign having a maximum of square feet in area for purposes of identification and announcement of church services, subject to review and approval of the County 'Zoning Administr--� 9. No loudspeakers or amplified music shall be permitted outside the en- closed building. 10. Light standards for the parking area shall be low lying. All exterior lights small be deflected to shine on applicant's property and not toward adjacent properties. No neon lights shall be permitted anywhere on the premises. 11. Comply with the requirements of the Flood Control District, as follows: Vie installation of storm drainage facilities as stipulated in the County Ordinance Cade (Title 9) shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations t»- the Flood Control District and the Building Inspection Department; and in particular: A. Surface waters entering or originating within the subject site shall be adequately collected and conveyed to a natural watercourse or an existing adequate storm drainage facility without a diversion of watershed. { si f K` Danville Baptist Church -3- Sept. 3, 1475 2081-7S B. A study shall be made by the developer's engineer to determine the hydraulic adequacy and bank stability of the creek through this development. Should the creek be inadequate and/or the banks un- stable, the necessary improvements shall be constructed to correct the deficiencies. 71tis study shall extend through the upstream adjacent parcel to show that the site improvements are not subject ' to flooding. C. Any grading done on the southerly 3+ acres shall direct surface waters into the existing creek within the- site. Adequate outlet structurep will be required if at any point along the creek the surface waters discharging into the creek are concentrated. D. IF necessary, the existing roadside ditch and any associated culverts located between the subject development and the exis-ting storm drain culvert under San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately 1,500 feet to the north, shall be improved by the developer on an interim basis, so that runoff from the northerly 2+ acres will not worsen the drainage situation on downstream properties. The necessity for this work will be determined by the Flood Control District, based upon information to be furnished by the developer. a E. Execute a Deferred Improvement Agreement with the County which will- require that the applicant: a) Construct necessary longitudinal drainage improvements along the frontage of the subject parcel. b) Contribute towards the cost of the storm drain between the subject parcel and the existing storm drain under San Ramon Valley Boulevard, approximately 1,500 feet to the north, in the same proportion as the runoff contributed by the subject parcel bears to the total runoff intercepted by the Strom drain. 12. Comply with the requirements of the Fire Control District, including the following: A. This Fire District finds no fire hydrants within 300 feet of .this Marcel. We therefore require that an adequate system of water mains anal fire hydrants be provided. This may also require one or more in yard fire hydrants if the building is 150 feet or more from the public Street. (Applicant to Bieck with Fire District for possible changes). 13. Comply with the requirements of the Health Department, as follows: A. The sanitary sewer will be available within one year. Applicant should apply to Central Contra Costa Sanitary District for annexation and per- mission to use the sewer. Nge 6 t 1 7.. Danville Baptist Church -4- Sept. 3, 1975 2081-75 14. Comply with the requirements of the Public Works Department, as follows: A. Deed to the County 37.35 to 44.69-foot-wide strip of additional right of way on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, as requires! for the planned future width of 100 feet. The present right of way width is SO feet. The deed will be prepared by the Public Works De— partment, in accordance with the Precise Alignment Map PA 5301-68, and must be executed by the owner before the building permit can be issued. B. In accordance with Section 94-4.414 of thq.Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within the area to be deeded to Contra Costa County, for road purposes should consent to the deeding of the right of way and should subordinate their rights to the rights of the public in the deeded area. C. Install all new utility distribution services underground. D. An Encroachment Permit roust be obtained from the Public (Yorks Department, Land Development Division, for driveway connections and other construction within the right of way of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, unless such work is shown on the improvement plans. E. Execute a Deferred improvement Agreement with the County which will require that the applicant: a) Construct curb, 6-foot 6-inch sidewalk (width measured from curb face), necessary longitudinal drainage, and pavement widening on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard. The face of the curb is to be located 10 feet from the widened right of way line. In accordance with the frontage improvement policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors, the applicant is responsible for the construction of the first 20 feet of pavement widening, measured from the curb face, and the County will construct any additional widening necessary. b) Street lights are tentatively required to be installed. on San Ramon Valley Boulevard, final determination to be made by the Traffic Engineer. If feasible, this property and appropriate neighboring properties should be annexed to a County Service Arca for the maintenance and operation of the street lights. c) Stilomit improvement plans to Ilse Public Korks Department, land Develop- ment Division, for review and approval , pay an inspection fee (50 of the estimated cost of the work), and applicable lighting and fire hydrant fees. Curb grade plans will be prepared by the Public Works Department for use by the applicant in the preparation of the improve- ment plans. If occupancy is requested prior to construction of improvements, the applicant should execute a Road Improvement Agreement with Contra Costa County and post the bonds required by the agreement to guarantee completion of the work. - - ©19C ....: ....... . . . . i GELDERMANN INC. REALTORS 000 SAN RANON VALLCY BOULEVARD DANVILLC. CAL1r0RN/A 04526 TCLEPNONC 037-4242 November 3, 1975 Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning Contra Costa Planning Department P. O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Gentlemen: We wish to appeal to the board of Supervisors the decision handed down by the planning commis- sion on October 14, 1975, Item #3 on the agenda. Enclosed is a check for $50.00 to cover the fee. spectively yourg, J/ t. .�- �� ,� pit •-� Ray Mathews Geld Realtors Agent for the Babtist Church ^R -7ti /sag Enclosure 'T3 CD as Microfilmed with boord order UAW IMF- B-'' I f G s- LIA 7j • , � .•� ��- et 4. o- • f. - - U • ./- ... , �_ ��.��•�-.-.� �_��.,.,.,.�.,.�:.._,__. ��.. t::�� ,yam � s- I , • df �J r h� �+�.vj�•- [IL-C&%-C, A-tPC 0GO ft L �7. a•(rr�.Z. (��t- 4•Le Zi:�.-sM.L•.✓� - . .�j�� 'tea • . aL+►• P%—sIc,V.s.r..G �cz'•�r�fes. .•, . 46 003SG MimflhvW ,vi& bmW 1 l a l January 27, 1976 .crvisorEd::und A. Linscheid, District V r•es E. Vbri isor Jnas ry, District SIT RECEIVED i'ernor_ L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public tiorks Director. -14'� 70-""� N"A4- EEg 2 1976 1 t 3itville Mist Church 1. R. oLSsor� Lipp .1031-75 CLM BOARD of SUPERVISORS Tcfe.ren ce !s rade to your request at the meal hea inn of Danville Baptist on Sar. PP-mon Vallav T.oulevard ju:,t:north± of 'Mntevi.dco Drive, At the haarirng U'he -%urrh said they gore agreeable to dedicating tha necessary right of :-my for Vito widening of San M-mot Dalley Boulevard, in accordance with the ^dol tc:.j l:reclsc line plans. 'they oL cc-, however, to the rmiir—.ant that thc; entt-r into a deferred irprevement agxce cnt for the constructlic.n. of 20 fcvt of paving ani fronntzve iunravc..-onus at such time as the rcnaindcr of that port on of Smi Pmon V--112y Boulevard is widencd. At Ome hcari�g you rcqueste.:, copies of c trak"fic study which had heel done f-cr t1to Wishop F.G n h ?.-sessm-cat District. In as muck as the entire study is xa:.h:or WVy. ve- have tal-n the libert/ to excerpt tlzsc portions dirW-ly 1-M... t.abl a to .fin R=on :'alley Boule-~..rd and, paints raised at the appeal t ez ing. ;.s w*?1 be noted, the report was st ir..itted to the County in Vam—ter i573 and ms done b,• Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc., of San Jese. T?,.r s--con?- pane contains a brief deser=nt;on cr the m.-rposc of the report and the statistics used to arrive at Uze recomendations contained in the Svpearvisor r!oriarty questioned the need for a feta-lane facility on the wast side of Interstate 6S0 and t:hether a similar facility on the cast side of int;rstate 680 could better serve the traffic needs. At the botta-t of the third pagm, which is attacgted to this meaortndtm, are three paragraphs regarding the extension of Industrial Spin: Road, Which is in fact a proposed four-lane road paralleling aid eas toly of Interstate 650. These para:;raphs indicato thiwt a north-senath road beta zee �bntrvidaa Drive and Bollingor CaVon Road vvz-%13 be advantageous to traffic eirculatioll but would b^- very detrimental to residcntial nciwhborhzc..--4s threu h which it uould pass. The a's:Lirth aLt.c::cd p:.gc indicates rccomandatiors of the traffic study which ..x^ i.lc c Far -=On lrhllcy swal?-i—a-0. bezzueen Bollinger Canyon rmd and Lha soot% of Cite stu-s; area wMell., vas a on evidco Drive would rcruira a two-lare read "actween 1975 awl 100, ani: as fou -?:ate rom! aft--r ISM Of particular ,i-mpirzia is t .,.n, E._ t tkn L this st +; 6Y �S d0^y ?lirrye Cz7m;-on =i nd tra Trtv'rst:tc 6F0 ticuld -wcr.st`.ructed c!u n' itte of 1ID755 tri9�9. Curxc-tt strure:.tic-t fin t..L 5«:zte n' C.aliror.:i t 3I}.=i'c:stcz - ' `•� +.i • �•.z e A i nn /� ??. s �er rye. .i�l t.� aIc t� i nc,. ., wo:t�tr ct3oa o. tz c �-4.•.p s trit:'t::t a nl. rexx tj,,rnlcv 0 Microfilmed wife board order t ry I Sugorvisors Linscheid & Yoriarty -2- Jury 27, 1976 ':fie Barton-Aschzn report indicates that San Ramon Valley Boulevard will be carrying 28,000 vehicles por day by 1990 if the Bollinger Canyon, r.uma-e not constructed. T'nis traffic burden would require a six-lane divided riZhimy. Our our. Manning continues to be based on the construction of res at 113011in er Canyon !road b-_ccusc it is our opinion that the severe traffic problms that will arise will raise the priority of the raz? construction. ith ramps at Bollinger C canyon :load, &ston-AscT=n estimates the traffic 1►olume on San ganmon Valley Bnoulzaard to reach 16,000 vehicles ger day vithir. he next 15 years. This voluse of traffic could be accormodated with ;n tu:diti-ided foLr-lane road which would regrilre less right of way; however, as brought out in the hearing, there is z r_ attractive stand of trees aloe each side of Cis portion of can R=on Valley Cculevard and the utilization of a madi ren divider would permit tic retention of those -roes within the nediaa. he requiremcnt for daJication of right of vay and a deferred improvement agreement for the widening of the road is consistent with tate conditions or. other develepers :.lc,L :his portion of San Razoa Valley :oulevard. X./blip ::zclosl:re ` cc: planniny D;partuent Arthur G. Will, Comity Adninistrator trisL L. Kermit, DenUty Pubic corks Director, Tr, -tat-;W`« !)cc-. C. Kline, Business Services Division i C_ _ s r 1 S INTRODUCTION This report describes the transportation system that will be necessary to serve the area known as Contra Costa County Assessment District 19713—San Ramon (hereinafter referred to as the District). The land-use plan for the District includes residential, light industrial. controlled manufacturing.and commercial areas. In addition,community services such as schools.parks,fire stations,day-care centers,etc.are shown in the plan. In order to determine the requirements for the District transportation system,an analysis of both site and non-site generated traffic was made. For site traffic (i.e.,those trips which have either one or both trip-ends within the District)the analysis was based on the projected land-use pian as supplied by Dan Coleman Associates and Ecoseape—the land planners for t the District. Each element of the land-use plan was analyzed so that automobile trips to and !l from the land parcels could be determined. Estimates of non-site traffic (i.e.. that traffic passing through the District) were derived from long-range traffic projections completed by the Contra Costa County Planning ` Department. These projections, done on an average daily traffic (ADT) basis, were converted to afternoon peak-hour estimates so that an analysis of roadway lane requirements could be performed. The traffic projections were used to determine the number of roadways and the lanes per roadway that would be needed upon completion of the District land-use plan. The lane l requirements and street alignments were to be established so that the traffic plan of the District would reinforce and support the San Ramon Valley and Contra Costa County thoroughfare pians.The transportation planning,then.has two objectives: 1.To assure that the roadways within the District boundaries are sufficient in number and width for efficient traffic movement without congestion. 2.To assure that the District traffic and transportation plan is compatible with valley and county plans. 1 � j G ■ r i - vow ! t 40 •. • � ! t Itto !`ttttHtgllaa • I ► / Of • \ % f of 01 01 sof � L, • i sii��' / it � r s ! ' ♦ ♦ j�1 ulk- 17 Irk ♦ y ij f _ i� i ♦ '! • M / # of � 5 •i� ruuurrut►//rl►It el •}i i •t t Iitt/ltitit 2 LANE ; •'. ' «t r It S i 1►�r��w4LAN£ �:►wr»aa --------------- ------------- It +t + t aaau►►►►► .+ • •ii • 4 LANE DIVIDED = as rr►►►►i►►►rrrrirr M+�+► 6 LANE DIVIDED ,1 ♦,,,,itiaaaaa►tttatatla* �rrrrr e VAJOR ROADS 'r''rry►/�ixaa�a�* '� r'r, • • -- COLLECTOR." INOR ROADS ,'! « ••• `` •« •. rrrr'jto '''r►►►►fir► ---^— ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY i RECOMMENDED ROADWAY NETWORK FIGURE 0091"1, I t ,:.. 3 PF� pr J ,• Because of anticipated heavy turning movements, the intersection of Bollinger Canyon Road-Industrial Spine Road will require special tum-lane treatment: a free flow right-turd lane for the southbound to westbound tum; double left-tum lanes for the eastbound to northbound tum; and an exclusive right-tum lane for the eastbound to southbound turn. The capacity calculation listed in Table 3 assumes the above cross sections. i The above capacity calculations show that in a great many instances roadway widths are being proposed which would provide capacity in excess of what is needed to merely reduce or eliminate congestion. These widths have been recommended so that the roadways will reinforce the District thoroughfare plan, thus encouraging traffic to use the proper streets. Adequate arterial streets and uncongested industrial collector streets leading to the arterials will preclude the need for industrial traffic to look for "short-cuts." This is important because in many communities the industrial "short-cuts"often are residential streets. I � In addition to providing excess capacity, the roadway design has been tailored to the land-uses it is serving. Divided roadways have been proposed along the major residential collectors to protect vehicles as they tum onto local streets and to provide a median suitable for landscaping. The safety and amenity advantages of the divided roadways have taken precedence over the capacity requirements in the roadway planning process. Table 4 shows the Contra Costa County thoroughfare standards that have been j recommended by the county for use in the District. In each case, sufficient right-of-way is provided for widening if it is needed over the long range. A point should be made concerning cross section continuity.On Figure 7 it appears that some roadways are frequently changing cross sections—a condition which may prove to be confusing to the motorist. Norris Canyon Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard are the two best examples. A short four-lane divided section along Norris Canyon Road has been recommended between two-lane and four-lane undivided sections. The divided portion was recommended to ensure smooth traffic operations in the vicinity of the retail center. Throat-widening at access points along the south edge of the retail center would probably be so closely spaced that this road section mould be better defined if it were designed as a fully divided section. San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Norris Canyon and Bollinger Canyon Roads has been recommended as a four-sane undivided route because left-turn movements will be extremely light. However, design and construction considerations indicate that it may be easier and less costly to build this section as a divided roadway thus creating a more continuous cross section. ALIGNMENT Extension of industrial Spine Road Only one alignment modification to the road network proposed by Dan Coleman IAssociates!Ecoscape has been shown in Figure 7.An extension of the Industrial Spine Road south of Bollinger Creek Road to Montevideo Roan has been proposed by the county. i ' 23 00,97 P71 T e,. ' Table 4 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS Pavernwt Width Basic Roadway Basic Bicycle or Traffic Traffic Bicycle or Type Right-of-Way(l) Parking Lane Lane(s) Median Lane(s) Parking Lane Two-lane 60' 8' 12' -- 12' 8' jFou�_la�e: 68' - 26' — 26• ll Four-lane divided 100' 8' 24' 16' 24' 8' Six-lane divided 124' 8' 36' 16' 36' 8' (1) Basic right-of-way may have to be increased at signalized intersections to provide bus turnouts,double tum lanes,right tum lanes,etc.where necessary. The advantage of the extension is that it gives residents along Montevideo Road easier access to Bollinger Canyon Road and thus to Interstate 680. Without this route, residents would have to use either Aleosta or San Ramon Valley Boulevards to reach Interstate 680. The route would also be advantageous to the manufacturing area, giving employees another access route to the south. Unfortunately,it would also be the greatest disadvantage of the route. The roadway would pass between two residential neighborhoods and end at Montevideo Road (a road which has for the purposes of this analysis been considered a residential collector route). The land-uses adjacent to the route, therefore, do not seem compatible with the type of traffic that it may be forced to accommodate. Keeping trucks S off this road section even though it has not been designated as a truck route will likely require concentrated enforcement efforts. Additional Route West of Interstate 680 The county also recommended an additional route generally paralleling San Ramon Valley Boulevard in the far westem portion of the District. This route was not included in the recommended roadway plan because there seemed to be a likelihood that this would introduce through traffic into residential areas and also because the roadways that are now planned west of Interstate 680 do not appear to be loaded even to Level of Service C . �� operation. `-1 p c t--t� r C * Collector Street Alignment The minor and collector roads may not retain the alignments shown in Figure 7 when detailed planning is completed. For the purposes of this analysis, however, roadway continuity is more important than exact alignment. 24 ©9 f f 0 amo n O Q E N �t �t ato A 0 00 0aQ J . to m aD Q C) O a) � avv .� V 'W a— 0 00 QO . 41 1W v v 1W � ,� 0 there seemed to ue a t s that are novo read„ray plan because and also because the roadway the Mtommended l of Service C traffic into resident'wl areas to be loaded even to Leve introduce througfi M do not appear r planned west of lnT�a It �< operation. j/ Lr' l''` 1. Collector Street Ali nrnent not retain the alignments shativn in Figure 7 when . . Far the Purposes of this analysis, hosnrever, road%VaY The minor and collector roads may detailed planning is tamp . continuity is more important than exact alignment. 24 w i ca th p C] C3 C3 CL 93 C3 93 C3 0 00 to cw v v v v �r to Co .r to AT v w sr cr rr a CD LD a to E C3 C3 2- C3 C3 C3 C3 C3, 0 v t�tvvvv V, V sr �a gTVgrq^ V � ? ra .- cc C. CD z i ►� C) C3 D C3 r`Es C3 CS 00 C1 � C3 IT cvvcvc� sr `s Srqu- gw vITC*jV MM st + in C C-4 C-4 tctvCMC-4 Vv � tva�^ IT RTC%jCvqwc4cv w C4 0 0 z m a o o roc ea m C) c o O O p Q, > c a v cry a�, y C U 0 o c o cn O ora �_ O C VCM Co o wC V C ? > w V in r ate+ ►p i 4 tl a CM C ✓ ✓ w o _C � o fA us � � 3O L _ 0 O O _u a CC -0 .2 a, ” fl �► O O "m' CO) }� O 1— Q to to —C: Q tC C c ,� Z Coto tr v �.. M i 2 MUS Caa o g 0sz G► �' O o ca es -a =1 O o r w mO 4t 2 CE q so cc Ir O CC C Cg► O U CC C3 ` ¢ 40 = OOa , p C C O C Go C1 C � A c3c3 �, ?>W t (MU)CO CL 0 U nn - >- Cm m ao — a C3 0 U o 'er U C3 > C31 C1C3 a S Q Mw• 3 ;` C C — d 0 w .�. VO Q O ��• r O O O O 0 7 .I p� w cc C C C 2 � c c c C3t3Zcnmcc C.) 0 O O O ~ > a 'Ci U a O > O m O cc v C3 Cr cc O o � >- ,� W 0 v ■ N z: afl M C3 D C) tLU o m O p Q tlr V z to C) Q 7 • 28 a� �. 00L "3 'i iE M in the 000rd of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 . 19: 76 In the Mcrter of Approval of Contract with Anita Thede for Probation Counseling and Tutorial Services. The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Anita Thede for Probation counseling and tutorial services from February 1 , 1976 to June 30, 1976 ata cost not to exceed $1,750. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 2976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is n true and correct coo y of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Su n on the date aforesaid. O cc: Probation tion Officer i`SO Witness m hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Probation Officer Y Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 3rd day of February 1976 c/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County AdministratorB Deputy Clerk N 24 1x74 . 15-M iYle M. Ne e JHB 0 A���4 .•. .. STANDAiw CuPiTRACT (Purchase of speciaT-Te—rvices) 1. r^-mw-ez .t :aan+irication, :.= 35033-324-711-2310 • ._ _ser Ciepartment: Probation Department sabject: Counseling and Tutorial Services 2, Parties, The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, ar_ the followin-a n&=ed Contractor mutually agree and promise as follais: :zn tractor: Anita Thede Lapacity: Consultant Address: 101 Tunnel Road, Berkeley, CA 94705 3. Tera. The effect:-Oe ...a of this Contract is February 1, 1976 and it terminates June 30, 1976 unless sooner terminatea as prove a erein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5, Pa �ment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S "Ou.uu 6. Count 's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: FEE RATE: $ 7.00 per service unit: aX) hour; or session, as defined below; or calendar (insert: day, week or month) 140T TO EXCEED a total of 250 service unit(s). 7, Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Cons u tation, specialized instruction, and training in Juvenile Intensive Supervision Program for County-selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by county, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. 8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not inter to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. ' Contractor .shal) defead,' save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees fta6 all= liabiliti.es and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or;property, including.without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whetker.or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authorit . This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COWITY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR Fa s ' Sys 16 8 Kenny By T!Yman, Mira of 54pe 7rs L�F�iI.GGGLL�/!Ki Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk (Designate official capacity) sy -/ IL Deputy Recommended by Department 0091."5 By ��- (Form approved by County Counsel) Microfilme-d with board order. r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Proposed Safe Driving Award Program. Mr. A. G. Will. County Administrator, having submitted to the Board a February 2, 1976 memorandum advising that the County Sheriff-Coroner has recommended a Safe Driving Award Program which would provide certain awards to Sheriff's personnel who reach various plateaus of accident-free driving; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having inquired as to whether the program would be restricted to the Sheriff's Department, and Mr. Will having recommended that a Board Committee be requested to study the program to determine the feasibility of implementing same in other County departments; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid memorandum is ACKNOWLEDGED and the matter is REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) for review. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order afted on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesokL cc: Board Committee MIdneu my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff-Coroner super"sors County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February , 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By z2 -A 117 Deputy clerk xaryXcraig w 403 6 H 24 8/75 10M 1 a PASSED by the Board on February 3, 19T6, . hereby axrtify that the fonmaing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of County Sheriff-Coroner S"pe^nsors County Administrator affixed this 3rd day of February , 1476 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. ( Deputy Clerk Mari"Craig 003T76) 6 H 24 4"S IOU .2 t+ t' OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR R CE1 V ,�D f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FEB -7 197a RA Administration Building �' a'wfZ?ht R. Martinez, California CLERIC BOARD OF SUPRVIiOR$ A CO. To: B d o Supervisors Date: February 2, 19 B. X'°° From,('_'4hur G. Will, Subject: County Sheriff-Coroner County Administrator Safe Driving Award Program " The County Sheriff-Coroner has recommended that a Safe Driving Award Program be approved by your Board, which would provide certain awards to Sheriff's personnel who reach various plateaus of accident- free driving. The following awards are proposed: 1. 25,000 miles - black leather, wallet size standard uniform badge holder for use with non-uniform dress. 2. 50,000 miles - gold badge duplicate of uniform badge issue, flat style for use in leather case. 3. 75,000 miles - $50 U. S. Savings Bond Series E. 4. 100,000 miles - $100 U. S. Savings Bond Series E. 5. 150,000 miles - Smith & Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Revolver, stainless steel, with appropriate message engraved to commemorate the occasion. At the annual average mileage per employee of about 30,000 miles, it would take about five years of accident-free driving to reach the top plateau. Inasmuch as the nature of police work involves a high accident risk and concomitant costs, it is good 1,11--i ln,..... i-n -nn• *nr ; - . f OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR LREEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY �, 1970 Administration Building O�-`«XMartinez, California of SUPc'Rvfaon A CO. To: B d o Supervisors Date, February 2, 29o.,., Fes, thur G. Will, Subject: County Sheriff-Coroner County Administrator Safe Driving Award Program ' The County Sheriff-Coroner has recommended that a Safe Driving Award Program be approved by your Board, which would provide certain awards to Sheriff's personnel who reach various plateaus of accident- free driving. The following awards are proposed: 1. 25,000 miles - black leather, wallet size standard uniform badge holder for use with non-uniform dress. 2. 50,000 miles - gold badge duplicate of uniform badge issue, flat style for use in leather case. 3. 75,000 miles - $50 U. S. Savings Bond Series E. 4. 100,000 miles - $100 D. S. Savings Bond Series E. S. 150,000 miles - Smith S Wesson Model 66 Combat Magnum Revolver, stainless steel, with appropriate message engraved to commemorate the occasion. At the annual average mileage per employee of about 30,000 miles, it would take about five years of accident-free driving to reach the top plateau. Inasmuch as the nature of police work involves a high accident risk and concomitant costs, it is good business to approve this program to encourage safe driving, the annual cost of which is estimated to be about $5,000. This matter is listed on my agenda for February 3, 1976; and it is recommended that this be referred to an appropriate Board committee for review. FF:lk cc: H. D. Ramsay C. J. Leonard 00?PAW`7 MicrQfFlrn�d uritF� 6aarcj order �i f 1 1 r in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 7-E— In the Matter of Recommendation with Respect to Appointment on Governing Body of Proposed Health Systems Agency. The Board having received a letter from Ms. Wilma West, Chairman, Legislative & Issues Committee, Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board, advising that said Board recommends the appoint- ment of a representative knowledgeable in the field of substance abuse to serve on the governing body of the proposed Alameda- Contra Costa Health Systems Agency; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid letter is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. 1A/itness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Ms. Wilma West Supervisors Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board affixed this 3rd day of February . 19 Z6 Director, Human Resources � J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Agency By /7?/2Cc'_i v/}/ 2� , Deputy Clerk County Administrator �1 Bonnie Boaz 00A S H 24 8P5 IOM ---------------- s • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 19 76 in the Manw of Aid-to-Cities Allocation to City of Martinez. The Board on January 13, 1976 having approved the rebudgeting of various City--County Thoroughfare funds, including an additional $3,000 toward the construction of Alhambra Avenue from Paso Hogal southerly to the Pleasant Bill City Limits; BOY, TSlliUWMg, IT 13 BY TBR BOARD ORDERED that said aum be allocated (from City-County Thoroughfare Priority B funds) to the City of Martiniz for the aforesaid project, as recommended by the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976• I hereby certify that the fonpoinB is a true and correct on fry of an order «Mend on the u9nutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Wb ca: City of Marlines 'mm my hand and A*Seal of the Board of Via Public Works superv" om Public Works Director affixed 3rd dal of February, i9 76 County Auditor-Controller ' ti J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By "kw, Deputy Cleric Jean L. Hiller coq t 9 H 24 W5 ]LOU _�w I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra - Costa County, State of California February 3 1976 t . In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Ms. Anna Martha Clements, et al , by and through their attorney, Mr. William R. Rapoport, Rapoport and Lewis, 1 Penin- sula Place, Suite 309, 1650 South Amphlett Boulevard, San Mateo, California 94402, having filed with this Board on January 13, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount of $500,000 as of date of presentation; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Claimant Supervisors Public Works (3) affixed this 3rd d of February . 1976 Attn: Mr. Broatch °Y County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Deputy/ Deputy Clerk Robbie 6btierr 00250 H 24 $175 IoM I hereby certify that the foregointi is a true and cornu copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisars on the data oformoid- VAtnea my hand and the Seo' of the Board of cc; Claimant �pervix'rs Qubi i c works (3) affixed this 3rd day of ' bruar 197E At-un: Mr. Broatch f% J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County CounselBy �,_� :,, G1 2, •.:. 1 Deputy Clark County Administrator Robbie tierr 003so • r i L E D 0 JAN 13 1476 J. R. ML ON CtEx,C 6UAitL► ;3 SUrERVt50RS CLAM OF ANNA JiWWHA CLEMENTS, EARNEST ROLAND CLEMENTS, JERRY ARNOLD CLEMENTS, BILLY WAYNE CLEMENTS, ROBERT LA14RF NCE 4 CLEMENTS and BETTY ANN MALLORY, Claimants, CLi T14 FOR PERSONAL INJURIES (SECTIOM VS. 910, OF TILE GOVERI MENT CODE) COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. f To the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors: You are hereby notified that ANNA MARTHA CLF.MF.NTS, EARNEST ROLA14D CLEMENTS, JERRY ARNOLD CLEMENTS, BILLY WAYNE CLEMENTS, ROBERT LAWRENCE CL&HENTS and BETTY ANN1tiALLORY, whose address is c% William R. Rapaport, Rapoport and Lewis, 1 Peninsula PT-rp chit- -%nn I • ' FILED 1 JAN 13 1976 ca" WIVO J SurdRVWRS CLAIM OF ANNA MARTHA CLEMENTS, EARNEST. _ 1�► . _ ROLAND CLEMENTS, JERRY ARNOLD CLEMENTS, z BILLY WAYNE CLEMENTS, ROBERT LAWRENCE CLEMENTS and BETTY ANN MALLORY, Claimants, CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES (SECTION VS. 910 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE) COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. To the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors: You are hereby notified that ANNA MARTHA CLEMENTS, EARNEST ROLAND CLEMENTS, JERRY AR11OLD CLEMENTS, BILLY WAYHE CLEMENTS, ROBERT LAWRENCE CLE.'4ENTS and BETTY ANN MALLORY, whose address is c/o William R. Rapoport, Rapoport and Lewis, 1 Peninsula Place, Suite 309, 1650 South Amphlett Blvd. , San Mateo, California 94402, claim damages from the County of Contra Costa in the amount, computed as of the date of the presentation of this claim, of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS [$500,000.00) . This claim is based on -personal injuries and wrongful death sustained by claimants' husband and father on or about October 3, 1975, in the vicinity of the intersection of Cypress Road and State Route 4 in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, under the following circumstances: Claimants' decedent was proceeding eastbound on State Route 4, driving his 1963 G.M.C. Pickup Truck so as to proceed on a straight course from eastbound State _Route 4 to eastbound Cypress Road when his vehicle was struck heat:-on by another 00151 -1- I vehicle proceeding westbound on State Route 4 at the intersection of Cypress Road. There were no signs posted warning oncoming traffic in either direction of the potential damages at this inter- section due to cross traffic entering Cypress Road from State Route 4. As a direct and proximate result of the County's failure, having had prior notice of this dangerous condition of public _ property, to errect and maintain traffic control devices at this intersection, claimants' decedent was caused to collide with another vehicle, suffering injuries resulting in death. The names of the public employees or agencies causing claimants' and decedent's injuries under the described circum- stances are unknown to the claimants at this time. The injuries sustained by decedent, as far as known, as of the date of the presentation of this claim, consist of, but are not limited to, various internal injuries and broken bones, and death. The amount claimed as of the date of the presentation of this claim covers expenses for hospitals, doctors, x-rays, medication and general mental and physical pain and suffering of decedent and all claimants, as well as estimated future mental and physical pain and suffering of claimants in addition to property damage to decedent's vehicle in a total amount claimed as of the date of presentation of this claim of FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) . As a proximate result of the wrongful acts and wrongful conduct of the County of Contra Costa which proximately caused the death of the decedent, the claimants have been deprived of the society, comfort, protection, services, inheritance rights, and support of the decedent and have sustained pecuniary loss in the sum of FIVE HUNDRED i THOUSA,�1D DOLLARS 0500,000-00) . Q0%.3-S2 -2- i _m. All notices or other cations with-regard to this claim should be sent to the claimants care of William R. Rapoport, Rapoport and Lewis, 1 Peninsula Place, Suite 309, 1650 South Amphlett Boulevard, San Mateo, California 94402_ DATED: January 12, 1976_ WILL IAi►i R. RAPOPORT" Attorney for Claimants r t r t , Y Y 7 s { 3 ' -3- -3- PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL— CCP 1013x,2015.5 1 declare that I am(a resident of/employed in)the county of_ 5 _ #;P _ �__, _.. ._._.,_. California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled cause:my(business/residence) address is: 1650 South Am hlett Boulevard.Suj�IRe_ plr_„ qQ,_Cal ;form_._.__ On_-..January 12,^1976 _ _ ,l served the attached__Claim.-for.-Perso.al-.Inj=ies w:Tea CSection 910 of the verAmeA-Cosde on the .Count. of---Contra-C.osta......._.__ ............_.i _ ........._. .. w . lt_ in said cause.by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid,in the United States mail at.$AjL-Ma eo-s...._Cd11f0rnia. __ addressed as follows Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Administration Bldg. 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 34553 I declare under penalty of perjuty that the foregoing is true and correct,and that this declaration was executed on" --.—A WUUAX',x....12,, _1976 _____ _.__�,at _San Mateo . .,California_ 4WTEi 4"PE OR PFENT%AMD '.+1'GMATi1RC ATTORNEYS PRWMNG SUPPLY FDRM NO.U REV JANWRv 1973 u 4 4 w 3 00354. i t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 003S4 .c In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 197,5 ; t In the Matter of Application for Leave to File Late Claim. Mr. Henry T. Peck, 215 La Salle Drive, walnut Creek,' California 94596, by and through his attorney, Mr. Jackson E. Morrison, Pisor, Vadney, George, Morrison & Bennett, Attorneys at Law, 2150 Valdez Street, Suite 1585, Oakland, California 94612, having filed with this Board on January 22, 1976 an application for leave to file a late claim in the amount of $750,000; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid application is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that lige &ragging !&,a true and correct copy of cm order mowed an the adnutes of said Board of Supervisor an the daft aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witnew my hand and the Seoi of the Board of Public Works (3) Supervisor Attn: Mr. Broatch affixed this 3rd _day of February 19 76 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By % ,�. . Deputy Clark Rofibi a Guth rrez a03S5 H 24 W3 lOiI1 i �t yrs 1 1 , JACKSON E. HORRISO`I, ESQUIRE PISOR. VADNI Y. GEORGE, 2 MORRISON & BENNETT ATTORNQY3 AT L.^W Ialso VAUNM 3 oAKL AN0.cAU F""saa�Z (4251763--44300 4 5 AThDmm PDR Applicant l i Lt 6 F L E `�- 6f A, � P�I'025 9 t�►- 10 HENRY T. PECK, ) ) 11 Applicant, ) 12 -vs- ) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIN 13 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, ) ) 14 Respondent. ) 15 16 TO: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA: 17 (1) Application is hereby made for leave to present a 18 late claim founded on a cause of action for personal injuries 19 which accrued on February 18, 1975, and for which a claim was not 20 presented within the 100-day period provided by Section 911.2 of 21 the Government Code. For additional circumstances relating to the 22 cause of action, reference is made to the proposed claim attached. 23 to this application. 24 (2) The reason that no claim was presented during the 25 period of time provided by Section 911.2 of the Government Code 26 is that the Applicant, HENRY T. PECK, was physically and 1 mentally incapacitated during all of the 100-day period specified 2 by Section 911.2 for presentation of the claim, as is more parti- 3 cularly shown by the accompanying Declaration of Henry T. Peck. 4 (3) Applicant's failure to present this Claim within 5 the 100-day period specified by Section 911.2 of the Government 6 Code was further through excusable neglect and inadvertence, and 7 the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA will not be prejudiced by this failure, 8 all as is -more particularly shown by the accompanying Declarations 9 of Henry T. Peck and his lawful wife, Well Ann Peck. 10 WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this 11 Application be granted and that the attached proposed Claim be 12 received by Respondent and thereafter acted upon. 13 DATED: January 21, 1976. 14 15 PISOR, VADNEY, GEORGE, MORRISON & BENNETT 16 17 .By JACKSON E. MORRISON 18 Attorneys for Applicant 19 20 21 22 23 i 24 25 r 26 a F -2- z , a 1 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 2 3 TO: .BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF CONTRA_COSTA" Room 651, Pine Street 4 Martinez, California 94553 - Attention: Mrs. Russell 6 CLAIMANT'S h1A!1E: HENRY T. PECK 7 CLAI;MANT'S ADDRESS: 215 La Salle Drive, Walnut Creek, CA. 8 CLAIMANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER: (415) 944-1889 Y 9 ADDRESS TO 1:HICH NOTICES � SHOULD BE SENT: PISOR, VADNEY, GEORGE, 10 -- MORRISON & BENNETT 2150 Valdez Street, Suite 1585 11 Oakland, CA 94612 12 AMOUNT OF CLAIM!: $750,000.00 13 DA"PE CLAIM ACCRUED: Februaxy 18, 1975 14 PLACE CLAIM ACCRUED: The Intersection of Kirker Pass Road and Clayton Road in the City of 15 Concord, County of Contra Costa, State of California. 16 17 OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES OF CLAIM: On February 18, 1975, Claimant attempted to uralk aero-'-s the inter- 18 section of Kir%er Pass Road and Clayton Road in a westerly direction 19 in the cross-walk on Clayton head. 20 At s•.id time and place, the stop light regulating et;tbound podest,riai 21 traffic on Clayton goad romai,ned green for an insufficient period 2 uf- ti.to for Claimant herein, and/or other of the gorceral ptiblic 93 to Ct=;73,3leCely ec*ss -aid int_rsec- 1 ion to a po3itir�n of Safety. 24 As a direct and proximate result of 25 the timing of said atop �• t+.�1., !;a;d --;top t;uc .red ^, ri!d ..'Oile Applicant: was utill 0 i i li 1 physically present in said cross- walk on said roadway and Claimant 2 was thereafter struck by an automo- bile traveling southbound on 3 Kirker Pass Road.: 4 ITEMIZATION OF INJURIES: By reason of said accident, Claimant suffered a multiple fracture of his $ left leg, other injuries to his body and shock and trauma to his 6 nervous system, and full extent of which cannot be ascertained at 7 this time. 8 DATED: January 21, 1976. PISOR, VADNEY, GEORGE, g MORRISON & BENNETT 10 �- By 31JACKSON E. MORRISON . Attorneys for Claimant 12 13 15 ya 16 17 18 19 20 21 '22 ^,3 24 IS 00359 i 1 JACKSON E. MORRISON, ESQUIRE P1som VADNEY. GEoRCw. 2 MoRRtSoNt 8c aawmt-rc wtso�►c�rA wr a ww f =50 Vie evr j 3 CIAM.O.N0. waai2 j PLIM 7413-4600 4 5 &-rmp%,En FoR Applicant 6 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 10 HE14RY T. PECK, ) 11 Applicant ) NO. ) 12 -vs- } DECLARATION OF HENRY T. PECK Ill SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE 13 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA } TO FILE LASE- CLAIM. 14 Respondent ) 15 16 I, HENRY T. PECK, declare under penalty of perjury: a 17 At all times relevant to this Application and Claim, I 18 have resided and now reside at 2157 La Salle Drive in the City of ,.3 3 19 Walnut Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of California; 20 On February 18, 1975, at approximately 11:45 p.m. , I ' 21 was struck by an automobile as I attempted to walk across Kirker r 22 Pass Road at the intersection of Clayton Road and Kirker Pass Road; 23 That as a result of said automobile-pedestrian accident, a24 I suffered severe personal injuries, ' including but not limited a 25 to a multiple fracture of my lower left leg; That as is more full set forth in the accompanying 2b Y t t 0011-1J0 i C r r I Claim for Damages, I believe and thereon allege that the City of 2 Concord, and/or the County of Contra Costa, is legally liable s 3 to me for general and special damages resulting from said tl 4 accident; 5 That I failed to file a Claim with the governing boards 6 of the City of Concord and the County of Contra Costa within the 7 100 day period specified by Government Code Section 911.2 because 8 I was physically and mentally disabled during that entire period 9 as a result of my said injuries suffered in said accident, to wit: 10 Immediately following said accident, I was transported 11 to Mt. Diablo Hospital in Concord, California, where I was 12 admitted as an inpatient for treatment of my injuries; 13 I remained in said hospital until March 4, 1975, when I 14 was discharged to home care at my residence; 15 That while admitted at said hospital, an open reduction 1 16 of the fractures of my left leg was performed; several pins were 17 installed in the bones of my left leg, and I was placed in a full 18 hip cast; - 19 That after my discharge from said hospital, I was con- a 20 fined to my bed at home until I was readmitted to said hospital fo: 21 further treatment on March 10, 1975; 22 That I remained in said hospital as an inpatient until { 23 March 21, 1975, when I was again discharged; 24 That during the period March 21, 1975 to April 30, 1975, H 25 I remained at home in a full hip cast except for one visit to the 26 Mt. Diablo Hospital Outpatient Clinic on April 18, 1975; -2- fl+G 11 i ..,Epi... :. ..,_. .. .. l F I 1 That on April 30, 1975, I was admitted as an inpatient 2 for further treatment at the Martinez Health Center in Martinez, 3 California; { 4 That I remained in said Health Center until I was again f 5 discharged to my home on May 6, 1975; b That from said date until June, 1975, I remained in a 7 full hip cast and was confined to my residence; 8 That from the time of said accident until June, 1975, I 9 was in extreme pain, and was heavily sedated; 10 That during said period, I was in a full hip cast 11 except in those instances when I was an inpatient undergoing 12 surgery in one of the hereinbefore described medical facilities; 13 That during said period, I was ambulatory only with the 14 use of crutches, and could not drive a car; 15 That said hip cast was not removed until mid-June, 1975, 16 and I still, as of this day, have a cast on my lower left leg whicl 17 inhibits my ability to drive an automobile; 18 That my failure to file a timely Claim was further due 19 to inadvertence and excusable neglect in that on January 29, 1975, 20 my wife, hell Ann Peck, was diagnosed to have uterine cancer, 21 underwent a hysterectomy on April 1, 1975, at John Muir Hospital ti 22 in Walnut Creek, California, and was also confined to our residenc6 23 from April 1, 1975 to April 30, 1975; i 24 That I was consequently extremely concerned with my 2$ wife's physical and mental condition, as well as being concerned 26 with my own health problems, during the 100 day Claim filing perioc 00?"2 -3- r 1 j { it • Ii 1 That I am informed and believe and thereon allege that ' 2 police officers employed by the City of Concord fully investigated 3 said accident immediately after it occurred, and Respondent herein 4 therefore had actual notice of the occurrance and attendent 5 circumstances of my said accident; 6 That I therefore assert that Respondent has not and could i 7 not be prejudiced by my failure to file a timely Claim; 8 WHEREFORE, I respectfully ask that Respondent herein r 9 grant my Application for Leave to File Late Claim and act on said 10 Claim. 11 Executed at Walnut Creek, California on January ,;:7Z1 , 12 1976. 13 HENRY T. PECK r 14 15 16 17 ,. 18 R 19 20 21 22 23 24 23 s 26 Y —4- 002793 } } d 1 JACKSON E. MORRISOI� Pisan, �/ADNEy '• ESQUIRE 2 MORRISON 8C Br.NNE-rr &TVCwfCV6 wr yew lY 20 21 i 22 23 4 Z` 25 26 .:y _ y . a 1 JACKSON E. MORRISON, ESQUIRE PIsom VADNEY. GEORGE 2 MORRLSON Be BENNErr y wnnr+«m Ar u w z,so vim•0n 3 0AXI-Mgm CALWOF n"s�4etz � {41S1 763 +teOC1 5 A=RNM FOR Applicant 6 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COORT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) 10 HENRY T. PECK, ) A ) 11 -Applicant, ) NO. 12 -vs- ) DECLARATION OF NELL ANN PECK IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE ' 13 COUNTY OF CO_'ajuk COSTA, ) TO FILE LATE CLAIM. ) 14 Respondent_ ) ) 15 a 16 I, NELL AMT PECK, declare under penalty of perjury= 17 At all times relevant to this proceeding, I have been 18 and now am the lawful wife of Applicant, HENRY T. PECK; 19 That at all times relevant herein, my -husband and I hav 20 resided together at 2157 La Salle Road, in the City of Walnut 21 Creek, County of Contra Costa, State of California; 22 That on January 29, 1975, my physician, Charles McGee, 23 M.D. , of 2021 Ignacio galley Road, Walnut Creek, California, 24 diagnosed that I had an abnormal growth in my uterus; 2$ That on January 21, 1975, I had a surgical biopsy 26 performed on said abnormal growth at the Walnut Creek Ambulatory i i r' k I Surgical Center; 2 On February 18, 1975, my husband, HENRY T. PECK, suffered 3 massive personal injuries when he was struck by an automobile as 4 he attempted to walk across Kirker Pass Road, at the intersection 5 of Clayton Road; 6 That the surgical biopsy previously performed on my 7 uterus revealed'a malijr, , and on April 1, 1975, a hysterectomy 8 was performed on me at John Muir Hospital in Walnut Creek, 9 California; 10 That I was thereafter confined to our residence until 11 April 30, 1975; 12 That during the period February 18, 1975 to June, 1975, 13 my husband remained at home in a full hip cast and under heavy 14 sedation except for those periods when he was hospitalized; 15 That because of my own health problems and my inability 16 to properly care for my husband after my own operation, it was 17 necessary for my natural mother, Geraldine Taylor, a resident , 18 of the State of Illinois, to come from Illinois and live at our 19 Walnut Creek residence from April 16, 1975, through the month of 20 July, 1975, in order to help care for myself and my husband. j21 WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that Respondent herein z 22 grant my husband's Application for Leave to File Late Claim and act 23 on said Claim. 24 Executed at Walnut Creek, California, on January .20 , 25 1976. t;O00,22,6n NELL ANN PECK , o 05 _2_ r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 1976 in the Matter of Claim for Damages. ' Federal Insurance Company, Bank of America Center, 555 California Street, San Francisco, California 94104, having filed with this Board on January 23, 1976, on behalf of its insured, Mr. Duncan Hayes , a claim for damages in the amount of $783.84; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works sup*nihorz affixed this 3rd d of February . 19 76 Atte: Mr. 6roroatch � County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By- ��f.� r /•�tiu Deputy Clerk Robbie GJ tierce . H 24 8"s IGI11 r E oerh*Y that the fo is a true and corred copy of on order enured on the 1 hereby aforesoid- hand and Seat guard of minutes of said Board of Supero on the d� Witness my tc: Claimant sup°r"om f February 19 76 Public Works ( ) off xed tris 3--r d—d� oJ. R. O LSSON. Clerk Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel 4 A:_ij, r:/irtiu Deputy Clerk County Administrator By Robbie G� tie N 34 �/TS IOIJI 4 INN a CHUBB/PACIFIC INDEMNITY GROUP C,tH OE3 Bank of America Censer, 555 California S... San Francisco, Calif. 94104 - Phone: (415) 989-3000 January 19, 1976 ENDORSED County of Contra Costa F 1 L E D City Hall Martinez, California JAN 2 3 1976 Attention: City Clerk J396 N 2,4 ap5 I*" } CHUBS/PACIFIC INDEMNITY GROUP i; i; CHUE3E3 Bann of America Cer.er, 555 California St., San Francisco, Calif. 94104 Poona, W53 989-3000 January 19, 1976 ENDORSED County of Contra Costa F I L E D City Hall Martinez, California JAN 2 3 1976 Attention: City Clerk spa -� es r cza CO. In reply please refer to: Policy 4: 1534 85 35/001 Insured: Duncan Hayes late of Loss: 10/24/75 Dear Sir: Our investigation indicates that the accident that occurred on 10/24/75 at Camino Del Diablo and Hiramonte Road, involving our insured, Carl Thomas Schmidt and Dana Van Dyne Tepper. It would appear that the cause of this accident is apparently due to the brushes that cover the curve of the intersection and give a poor visibility. As a result of this accident our insured sustained damages in the amount of $783.8 We are therefore looking to you for the reimbursement of our loss in the amount of S 783.84 which includes our insureds $ 250-00 deductible interest. Enclosed are copies of our bills for your consideration. If you are insured it is important you refer this letter to your insurance carrier and advise us of their name and address and your Policy number, so we can discuss this matter directly with them. If you are not insured, kindly send us your check or money order made payable to federal Insurance Company at an early date. Very truly yours, FEDERAL IMSURA?10E COMPA:'W BY CHUBB 3 SO4 INC. , Manager i , J4 { Sdi, iI,; ,! - t '�1 3' i1 l S t S I I..k t '�i 1 F f' f 1 p -1 I i �' a r s re, 1 t ^ �xH s it r x E yrs z k x B'!t IE+ it I s A 5 r" & cd S s 4 i m ' y ?;,,,f .'",. s k t 1 i x r'.`� f t t mSt i" `� p,$ i A ,,�t ,, '`-,,,,? '� dnn' 3 ,fi d ffi k 4 s y� `a t > s C t s , e r'S �V�, �!U .�ji I t o 3$ w�'Afi 4 .^ P t 5 $ a%, `� L Perna-vw 4 .a�. ,,,• < a t C,�i"Y ,�'rl. .11 i m"_ x r $,,.. Yrs'. YML 1 x " r u3 a P v t 441" t .. + w ,;.,, , ii- �, 3 +i a 1 P. 1 �T,X}.�,k - Po c s ,TT - c„ - ^s 4 6 "{ -. *— IT" `t,�% .Y a x k :1 fh �' g` u' } r ,�, •, ..�`J x 'sYC i �, s t,�"t,_jl, p�'- 4- a s„r^- " .rte°w ^ ` b t r �'` "r {`''�'q,,e t 'L a-1`I, f.a,4a 3^1'K�',a fc4} - �., ,� i ,� .. ry7 + e 4 v z ° ,„ "r''}t z 1,'x. 7 S«- _ `W r zP,4vu ,S, a AIiTOMOBtlAPPRAISAl: `' � � Y° _� £ � 'x ` t: { ,, Y' .� ,.„2I kgs- {�y,,. 11 .'7�f'V�1� 0 3"'^�C•�� �� I/�� �L'���(a�a�a � 1 � �� � 1,� *;ns�.v''�µ,wi�s � � .r� ra{�h���^,��` y�. ,i+. s:. "' x. -".>'t 9 3 v,,,,y. %R.' t -'t,: -T},y der ..r' - r.xl +4:�af-ygw dot x.r, . l r �- q h' rl'cY'"nrn� T';< 5i°: wr ' >"- "kY'+ � d11.1 Maw* 4a r � x ..+....-�...:..�.�T�IM�1 ;�,,, �„� c far t �: d r{' ,+r :. i ."''-E M: r s :. .srt ,, a .s r r };{�, .rN% - ,,�� ,�y# },.§t" <e �r � 5..-, ,�^+. 'x - +..w.�..� ! c .� ,,�r M.Y� +Ms<+uraff"a fid' 'S s. +e. e f'�� } .F Y r t il Mpd81 �*.�t=R `< 3n,�,3 ,,3¢� ; "Fn s�,, 'x«��r" t'�'.'s. .�.�...w .tt3a't"n` a 'f x� -.zar5 '-�Rr x�. aaa�. Ral ,�u,rrT11 7. 'i k 6 e 'z t''kt, >;7, S q<,peAK� 4.U �' '�..a fi s �` I,E eta 4 gM"'t -,;r .i r c.; x CRM��",,"+ * -3s , awe` -`~ uw .m - K T11T� 11 �1tE1!LAt"� i�7/11Rf 1 ,.,F. �« � ��� ��xR P i MAT"" �I�o 41 k�x y a k � rr ��6""� .999 , $ � N� - .: 2+ r t ti x cf -�' ,"' 3? 'Mt .4 f.a�,t "hs'..�w '.r w. iTi, n y;,, ,4. L'I"'' X° ry l `` # � '� #, „�11911'.1 1 r i rf' 'ii�` r"3r>°�,fi 't`°'"tri„ror'F�-r""' '.sS sv �P �x'_ _ � ��� .� +{1� !'t Mrc ti's'. S =�+ r zt }^` "'.:.. 1 2 fes',,£!n t .. Ia f i d' m 19 � Ii I C' �,I irt! ±z�-w1';rY.�,rs�? 3•t " Ar.r Y`b'rxLLLL 9 .t �1& 1 - -r l+, 1. a �I Z ..+�' �."��✓v� ✓ ° 1 ttt'.'�Sa"-Ki c'�^.S^rt11" - sct IN1411- 1, i :: 't E �# £ `°ac'" ,.' wYsy v �rrn -tit xr.::.eN „w".r+�}rrr.C$v }'ems+£ h,„,au�,� ,'i .'r k !f '- - 11'rgw�`.f, �*ir to y„ �_ �"� *£_ h IC � 1x`a .1�� a� .„. ,�y. i5 y ° 'd 6 's s _ / ,a "' '`� 3q` I� x.+'P .r; t-z kx w,'." iT 4 l�1 A 'SS; ,.r� k 1 2 i.GF `h a§` •,+a e� - 11 : vI 11.91 rk, — 'IC *} 3 n c '? r+ t ' • ' 4�."'.A.�76 '� � .hem a8 - �x r r 41 r- err - —, Yv 3x+ , s...a. �,, I -. a r i s. 1.,� r >< ,» "`ti �► - -1 t °'+,; +"`' '' nv v, t'S.zu,+utsa iz :=r - .111`,iP 4 > �^ 'y w t. f ;, t: 3 'r $ra �i �s-"'''�' , r „, '� 'ts n a ,r?�liiF`T`' # S 111`111� r �� '+.tea :IS�'rD�I :f R cW� # Zrv4N -"F `F"' yr"gry"?'":'' 7tT�} 'o-Yytr`fi,a'1.I �.� -- -_ .'T.} '� t 1 '" : - f = a t: ? ;r ,et 35� sS atMt"r�11 ,dd '.Kt', - ' - F , rs. { s ,'. '�'v+' `" "` .ems'. .£ , *Z Kim _,': `. • 4 sF b,' '''"�.m:717;71;—{z i..x� c, }g,.p*3 w - ,5u' v: YAR a+«xr+trr - #" p`� w,�,•... 11 I- �ti ,�#_} �F h Ti A L 9 ,I .YvS s .. 41141 :."?+S'�e+� p 7111 K rfq m.r' Hy sue f^�3p 1' � R�,y ''`'`,1` +�yi 4 -i„ a '+c?.A,'f A,1,+' �,dzr* .; t kf $� ' r ? r } ry ^fir -riy'y.'+._p ,, �r +`F' _ to a ».,..r, a �' r Lsxt, ,.y... xs 1 t x "�y 'a4s„Y.rr�Nn,x11!401111 IL-1 �+ " 7c'�M„''3ri 1.�°,3",'1" `"'?,'i + .r�k "` `'. 7 t "1 .' -`* c wiz ,d" /� .� is, M Til k.# ♦�.SrY�7YGwlZVNYtMl �����j�r '���t -, �+ J ��" 4" iftr t.t`r' - f'v nw�'i:Mn7 � w +� ]_ ��,yC,�, "� "Y t �M�M S.rzF tr��' s cx � � % z 4 -: �"f z�1 -s vc-rr" '�'' _ ,i X11 !#t�0,.IAM` �', �F .r- ,n,s w "i. ,r' z�l e�f T �t r� y i a, k rt r k a Yz " Aw �, z .: '' 1� ,rastaTMv ,ts ';�y ��`,.a �+� �*�—_ ,- "fit ;� r� ' ���•tn�. d .,s,.. ,,s '1,, _ � 1 �` "�M �+iM� �j a a•' A^F nye sf^'F ': F j r y 'a, y'i., ! "W*, "� it, ` e+" iia.. � x,. t ` "fir sU r>} ,, t .� "'. 9a' z S" t + W srE '�=_" t� " h"° 'a' �` `y,�c+zk5} ..w5. 1,,_.z+k f M Y 4.r s � .^r'„1u4* '^n•n,>I•{ `.�, '.:,, Ott ",`�y i I lr; n s ;" ,1!. -.R , r.,a Ilp 1 a l �—, CHUBB/PACIFIC INDEMNITY GROUP DRAFT No. THIS DRAFT IS' BE PRESENTED TO P^VABIE THROUGH CHUBS a SON 4 ' UWTED CAUFORD"BANK 5 CAUFORNUI ST S 405 WONTGOYERY STREET SF 0 5 2 3 91 Z t SAN FRANOSCO,CALF.94104 SAN FRANCISCOXAUF• �l AGENT NO INSURANC£POL�CIINO _i i •v P a v Sc scwtuaar+` rr (vwr.. •t«, 1210 %,4- B3-Q92x4 1534 =3S 3 t S 041 1 UPON AUCEPTA%,:f PAN-TO t 1 � L':f'3&�t r�AY►.t`S A`i� 'J�f`:T� �,T:; .'•:}i•Y THE SUM OF FIVE iitAtDFLED T&MRTY TIS'-t Alia _ t� IN SET 1 t F HENT i?' 4NDICATE tat,''URE OF CLAI». rt wssu.cc*aw IntSURA!iCE COMPANY ' IINSURED IF OTHERTraNr:.vEE -TW OTHER iHArilrtSUREOURPAYElfL TYPE OFIrtSURAriC£POLICY SANE AS 1 BOW.- .x,►t3 1:! tir-jC- XIM MAIL TO AGENTORBROAER _ VOID UNLESS PRESENTED VWTHSAYLOR AND HILL L SA P 1. � ROPA N TE I YEAR • iROtt DATE ISSUED 11.139 :WRISON ST. OAKUND IFCQNII A {A*-PORTAN P-DOCATE k:: OF St R.: q-O-G Ot THE APRJCABLE BOX OFADW �.�� q J toss P"V%"T C ?aR:t+l` t� x!'i!+:Ai ; i^�':?T%cft-' t". A,.: wt.yr� ccs: .Ea:. 1 gs+_+tsCs SkAOX,A— at acv ry{.v rf.(yG 0 FCA OFF-CEUSE ONLY i J 1wi moi. •,s - •�:'i'•�*ia'��+ "`.� _-' .. ER•'r`a:�f ��a4 �_.y .7• (FCR'E,004SE iSY7.tEYaTJ Citi:\ •S.+�:Qu ISO- No 3 C'N%lPLETF :*rHS :*A vel :r " - .r, ZTGt r.Ls`E A C01"PE%SATIC:PA'"E,TS �rxY I s S T a Fwmh27C:Sr.Ar; '] L-f39t ,2nM: .. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California $Af .n ABOV'E f3 it i ttf MAIL,TO . . . . AGEM OR RHORER VOID,UNLESS PRESENTED AR S AYLOR AND HIM SMA k 1. - N FROM GOTNINATE IS1.9 Su o 1.139 HARRISON ST. ' e Q' Kt.lVND IFU Ai - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WVORTANT ez CATS tib Cc mvyiz tt g» tai rr tX!TK APOUCABLE Box 8F_LOW aGF'FAp,►:CFtiti.^`.fx, I SAti„9/ACr NAWY.41`10% 19.J o1P toss mV16 NT c F'hs�:'tAL 'P i`PLi.. t rY#t+•t. �`r,44, - � rrxv cr.0� FOR OFFAMM USE ONLY i F.a r a'a.:%177 .y .y,+:: r,t v r�;sf tJ^ .i+ f; .+iY •.wC n: ra F,.`R E%TENSE CIP40 -S"OVV.WSOE A=xT 'Z"R UJ 1 -may,v� :.:: .-.x.a, r:.r "rk m0+:.ti:-»V440 RT WE C.'n�rlEtE; ON:Vti'�:+rNS - "t CCME*iSAt14`1 PA *r.;TS --'A.Y s S, .! F-uim$1'w`Sr.Rr. '3''3 4•l99i ,2a1.t; ,�. oto t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Californio February 3 , 19 76 r• In Om Mww of Claim for Damages. Hr. Calvin Y. Shaffer, by and through his attorney ' Mr. Michael J. Oliver, 2255 Contra Costa Boulevard, Pleasant Hill , California 94523, having filed with this Board on January 27, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount of $120,000 plus medical expenses; DENTED. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. ` j In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Mr. Calvin V. Shaffer, by and through his attorney, Mr. Michael J. Oliver, 2255 Contra Costa Boulevard, Pleasant Hill , California 94523, having filed with this Board on January 27, 1976 a claim for damages in the amount of $120,000 plus medical expenses; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. v 1 hereby enify that the fore9c m h o trees and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the dots aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works j su Attn: Mr. Broatch of fixed s �r daY of February 19 76 _. County Sheriff-Coroner / J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel y f Deputy Clark County Administrator Ro°bbi a GAti err H 24 8/7S IOU I I MICHAEL J. OLIVER ATTORNEY AT LAId 2 2255 Contra Costa Boulevard F LEL) Pleasant Hill, California 3 687-7575 JAN 2 7 1976 d J. z 0=14 Esc,BaA W OF SUrCV150A3 TWA' 06 7 8 Claim of ) 9 CALVIN V. SHAFFER ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES 10 v- ) 11 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ) 12 ) 13 TO: THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: 14 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that CALVIN V. SHAFFER claims 15 damages from the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, in. 16 the amount. computed as of the date of presentation of this claim, 17 of $120,000.00 plus medical expenses. 18 This claim is based on personal injuries sustained by the 19 claimant on or about October 28, 1975, at Walnut Creek, California , 70 under the following circumstances : 21 Claimant was illegally arrested by members of the Contra 72 Costa County Narcotics Strike Force of the Sheriff's Department s 23 whose identities are presently unknown to your claimant. -)4 The injuries sustained by the claimant were a broken left ?� elbow and mental anguish. shame and humiliation. j 76 The amount of claim_ as of the date of presentation of this claim, is computed as follows: 2g Damages incurred to date: 001 1. 1 Expenses for bail bond $250.00 General damages 50,000.00 2 Punitive damages 50,_000.00 Specials as determined 3, 4 All notices or other communications with regard to this 5 claim should be sent to claimant at: :Michael J. Oliver, 2255 6 Contra Costa Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, California, 94523 7 Dated: January 23, 1976. 8 i 9 CALVIN V. SHA FFE� 10 L 11 MICHAEL . OLIVER Attorney for Claimant 12_ 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OW i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 3 19 76 In the Matter of Legal Defense. IT IS 8Y TSS R.OARD OSDa'cm) that the County provide legal defense for hr. Joseph i'olkard, former Deputy District Attorney for Contra Costa County, in connection with Superior Court Action Number 157450, Mr. Hichael S. moss, Plaintiff, reserving all of the rigbts of the County in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Section $25 and 995• PASSED by the Hoard on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct co" of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. Joseph Polkard Wdnmw my hand and " Seal of the Board of Deputy County Counsel s'pervhors Napa County affixed this 3rd day of Eabruarv, 19 76 County Counsel ; J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By , �'� Deputy Clerk .Tear L. �w?ler A103 H 24 ons IoM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19-L6- In the Matter of Complaint with respect to Penalty for Delinquent Property Taxes. The Board having received a January 27, 1976 letter from- Mr. Kenneth D. Reynolds stating that a $41.31 delinquent penalty added to the amount due for the first in:stall=mt of his property tax is unfair, and requesting that said penalty be rescinded; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERID that the County Tax Collector is REQUESTED to submit a report on the aforesaid complaint to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Bias and E. A. Linscheid) for review. PASSED by the Board on Pebruary 3, 1976. ! hereby cer* shot the fon p kV b a true and cor»o copy of an ok1 r wdwed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc-, Mr. K. D. Reynolds Wdness my pond and the Seal of the Board of 1824 Piedras Circle &4mvisc" Danville, CA 945262 ag'ixed this. =d_�► of�aah=L-,-�, . 191r County Tax Collector I R. OLSSON, Clerk Board Committee County Administrator e ' . Deputy Cleric Helen C. Marshall 00434 H 24 a"5 low IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA February 31211976 In the Batter of j Claim of Ms. Renee Poe ) The Board having received a report from the Director, Human Resources Agency, with regard to the claim for compensation (S245) of Ms. Renee Poe. for services provided for Mrs. Peggy Beesley; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on February 3. 1976 asItrmw COPY I caft that this f s a rdL tree ac correct copy of the orictml da+=omt wifth b on fire In or Office. and dot it =i. y wci ate+:-d b� tttr iir+xrd of SnperrL*firs M or the d9ta st-o-'r. :., . "; s. '.: :s:;':,i3i; Co•Juty CMwk rL-es-aw.-:a G—r::of satd Ecom of SuDent"rs by Depay Cl" i r yk n � 1 t n Orig: Director, Human Resources Agency Ms. Renee Poe County Welfare Director County Administrator County Counsel 0 405 Human Resources Agency Date January 28, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY To Board of Supervisors RECEIVED From C. L. Van Marter, Director J:ifi � jQ75 &M20 OF SUPfR L%= Subj CLAIM OF MS. RENEE POE cavrPA A co. As requested in your Board Order dated January 20, 1976, following is a brief report of the circumstances which led up to this claim against the County, as well as my recommendation that it be denied. In June 1975, Social Service Department authorized payment of child care and housekeeping services for Mrs. Peggy Beesley on the basis of her incapacity. Mrs. Beesley then hired Miss Renee Poe. Social Service Department provided Mrs. Beesley with sufficient funds to pay Miss Poe for her services in June and July; Mrs. Beesley, in turn, paid Miss Poe for the month of June. Mrs. Beesley did not pay Miss Poe for services rendered in July because after cashing the check, Mrs. Beesley either lost the money or it was stolen. A police report was not made by Mrs. Beesley. Mrs, Beesley acknowledged the debt to Miss Poe and offered to work off the amount owed by working for Miss Poe's mother, who has a janitorial service. This plan was reportedly rejected by Miss Poe's mother. Miss Poe's mother then filed a request for fair hearing with the State Depart- ment of Benefit Payments, which was denied because she was not the recipient. The Appeals and Complaints Division of Social Service Department then reviewed the situation as requested by the State Department of Benefit Payments. A copy of their report is attached. It is my recommendation that your Board deny the claim of Mrs. Renee Poe for compensation of $245. This County has already met its responsibility by paying Mrs. Beesley that amount for child care services and has no further liability in this matter. CLVM:LK cc: County Administrator County Counsel County Welfare Director Attachment yr 6-xi,d Order It is my recommendation that your Board deny the claim of Mrs. Renee Poe for compensation of $245. This County has already met its responsibility by paying Mrs. Beesley that amount for child care services and has no further liability in this matter. CLVM:LK cc: County Administrator County Counsel County Welfare Director Attachment o,4 cerci order November 3, 1973 - - Ms. Yvonne A. Pee - 1305 Jensen Dr. Pittsburg, Calif. zr yy _ Peggy Beesley r N _ ©7-30-83391 06ar Ms. Foe: •- �-The State Department of Be.. fit Payments has forwarded your- October.g -1975 ,. letter to us for review.end r sponse, since you have no standing for a fair '-bearing, as you were not the.recipient of aid. As I mentioned in our several- telephone conversations, Contra Costa County discharged its obligation to As. Beesley when the child-care allowance was sent her. If she did not pay your daughter, your daughter r=t settle that - "�--between herself and Ps. Beesley_ Our responsibility is to see that Ms. Beesley =r ,s has the funds with which to purchase the service. Contrary to ghat You said •f:. j ,:;; i you were told, we have the right to pay child-care and supervision allc►mances = . H. .. - to the parent, rather than to the caretaker. Again, i suggest you,seek legal_':- _ _ ,_-action against Its. Beesley. ~: tours truly, - _ =_=� i •, ; Audrey Jane Sturges Appeals b CoMl ai nts Specialist AJS:eg . . _ _ a . 00407 d. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76. In the Matter of Approval of Agreement for Private Improvements in Minor Subdivision 102-72, Pleasant Hill Area. WHLRE.AS an agreement with Al Bowler, 1440 Broadway #900, Oakland, Ca 94612 for the installation and completion of private improvements in !Minor Subdivision 102-72, Pleasant Hill Area, has been presented to this Board; and WHEREAS said agreement is accompanied by a United Pacific insurance Company Surety Bond, No. U 89 74 25 in the sum of $20,400.00, for the full amount of the costs for comg?etion of the improvements required by the Board of Adjustment in approval of said minor subdivision; NOW, THERssrs GRE, on the recommendation of the Acting County Building Inspector, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHOP.IZED to execute same on behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data oforesokL Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of cc: Applicant supervisors Building Inspection affixed this 3rd day of February . 19 76 Gradin- Section J. R. OLSSON, Clerk (P) By ` a %j �, Deputy Clark .jean is. mlier 00438 H 24 w7s lam MINOR SUBDI1I'ISION AGRF.£Iti.%r1 (51) nor Subdivision: M5- 10Z-7Z (51)✓ Subdivider: (Private Improvements) Albert ow er (Stl) Effective Date: ��) rnInnI 4,i r+rt Pesci nri. n" • ,r true and correct copy of an order entered an the 1 hereby certify that the fonsgoing a a minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesakL Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Applicant Supervisors r3 February ,, 19 76 Building Inspection affixed this _day of Gradi - Section J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bj��✓ Deputy Clerk (P) y .ream u. Milier 00•1il8 }I 24 0175 lam i ^' Y+w MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREE .4 (§1) Rinor Subdivision: M5- [OZ-77- (§l) oz-7Z(§1) Subdivider: (Private Improvements) Albert Bowler (91) Effective Date: (§2) Completion Period: One year (53) Deposit: (faithful perf. )S $10,400 . � 1.' Parties Date. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, here;^after called "County", and the above- na*zed Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct,- install and complete private road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9 and including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved parcel man improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Building Inspection Department. •- Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work" within the above completion period from date hereof as required by Section 922-4.808 of the County Ordinance Code, in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a con- flict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. Improvement Security. Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall, in accordance with Section 922-4.604 (3) of the County Ordi- nance Code, deposit as security with the County at least the above- specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perfor- mance of this agreement. 4. Indemnity. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A - The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees; B - The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below . and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the parcel map improvement plan or accepted the improvements as cormleted, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these; C - The actions causinz liability are any act or omission (negli- gent or non-negligent) in connection with the clatters covered by this . agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any officer; agent or employee of one or more of then; D - Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on uhether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification, cotierino any of these ratters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly fron any negligent or willful misconduct of . any Indemnitee. 5. Costs. Subdivider shall pay when due all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. b. Nonperformance and Cots. If Subdivider fails to complete the _ I. n� .tom t .. i�oi Z: and ? ..;�: ,.1�,:. �. �� ., t ..=:� :e._ t : ..� ;,pecf_ c. tt this ag.C:.:.:i...^.t or extensions EranLed, County rLa ,proceed to complete thea by contract (� JAicroiilmed with board order -1- 00.1 1)9 .t r i �p or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges there- for immediately• upan demand. If County sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvement;,, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 7. Assignment. If before these improvement's are completed this minor subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing then. 8. Warranty. Subdivider warrants that the said improvement plan is adequate to accomp3ish this vori as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's acceptance of the improvements as complete, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. 9. No Waiver by Counter. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval o: work_ and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies :lith the requirements of this agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of •said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 10. Record Map. In consideration hereof, County shall accept said parcel map for filing with the County Recorder. COUIr:,X OF CONTRA COSTA SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) By Chthan, Board o ' Su visor s ATTEST: J. R. OLSS0113 only Clerk By & ex officio Clerk of the Board Designate official capacity in the business) By Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute Deputy ack:nowledg=ert forn below; and (2) If a corporation, attach a certified cop; of (a) the by-laws j axis.c14_•". ���'-`���" or (b) the resolution of the � Board of Directors, authorizing execution of this contract and of the bonds required hereby. State of California ) (Acknowledgnent by Corporation, County of Contra Costa ) ss Partnership or Individual) On December 3, 1975 , the person(s) whose .name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individ- ual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this inztrum:ert, and ack-nowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it-.-- SEAL t.SEAL " 1.'11� t/•.1 �wtz ,:�� ,.Uu� Patricia M. Dix~ `','�"' - '� Notary Public for said Count and State s-. .;_�; r'= �. t:.:: _ �., ism y (CCC Std. Form; Rev. 12/74) 2iJB:bw -2- 00-110 ..EX£dUTED IN DUPLICATE r+oti•e C'f rGE. TaCOrAn. :vnS,y,n:GrQ.. 'EXPO 1nsu4aiic,= arc:.%:rs. ...c• A=ARTHUR BROADWAY CENTER SUMVISION aONO P.O. BOX 11015 OAKLAND, CA 94611 (:15) 652-2605 Bond No. U 89 ,74 25 MMM—H 15 $ 6.00 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. ohm we AL-BOWLER' __� .nota Yar�,i,ei-oai_� w+ atu i county of cancra _ on December 3 1975 , the person(s) whose -name(s) is/are signed ased aLove fo: Subdiv_der j,-.d who is known to me to be the individ- " ual and officer or partner as stateuted it and titd above who atethehcorporais tionror and acknowledged to me that he exec partnership named above executed it.— ' RIAS�rSi� , SEAL _ f +r.!- �-:.:r .UTAPatricia M Bi Notary Fublic for said Colony and State is. (CCC Std. Form; Rev. 12/74) _2- 2iJB:bw s r r „EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE' r+oti•t e+�cE. T:.Cos.+n. •.v,�s.un:C;rO.. t, ,EXPO insw,aiict: arc:-c-rs, :..c- Moc tRTHt_?Q BROADWAY CENTER SUSDIV ISION i30ND P.O. BOX 11015 OAKLAND. CA 94611 Bond tio, U 89 .74 25 (415) 652-2605 Fai?f1[t1 $156.00 WOW ALL mEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that we AL.-BOVILER as f.incipoi, and UNITED PACIFIC RNSURANCE CO&V?ANY of Tacoma. Washington, a"Vloshington Corporation, authorized to do business in if-e State of ___ C1�ii ."ZtiIA!_ _ , as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto _ CONTRA ,COSTA QOPNWr CALIFORNIA_ as Obligee, in the penal sum of TEN THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NOL100 * * * * * *- * *�S -10,400.00 DOLLARS, iowful money of the milled States of Americo, for the payment of which well and truly to be nade, we bind ourselves.,our heirs,,executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and. severally, firmly by ' these presents. - WHEREAS, AL BOWLER F .-I L FEB 31976 GLORIA TERRACE J. a. OLSSON has agreed to construct in CONT iA Co. Subdtvision,.in PLEASANT .HILL CALIFORNIA the following improvements:_PER M.S. 102-72 NOW. THEREFORE, THE CONDIT10-4 OF THIS 03LIGATIO14 IS SUCH, that if the said Print.-ipol shall con- ;:' struct. or h-ave constructed, the omprovtrnents here.n described and shelf save the Obligee harmless from any loss, =st or damage by reason of its failure to complete said work, then this abligatioa shalt be null and void.- other. yise to remain in full force and effect. N;,--:d. 7.ealed and dated this —9TH day of_._ . DECEMBER _ _ i9 75 ALBOWLER _ - Pn�c.pot = By w ' Ura r E CIF Ir15t! MCE, 0.iPA*,)Yr I 'Bill F. Robison `•Tp >.^ 1 State of California . On December 9, 1975 ,before me,the undersigned, Notary Public of said county and state, personally appeared County of Alameda Bill F. Robison known to me to be the :attorney-in-Fact of i United Pacific Insurance Company � I the Corporation that executed the within instrument,and known i to me to be the perm who executed the said instrument on =•. ^�F,r�"_�=�L ',' behalf of the G,rooration therein named,and acknoc.Ied;Pd to me that such Gi poration c..ecutrtl the same. 00 1 ti J*A9&&,J��� lar c:.,:a.,•�+:'�"- ' -- - �3 t� _ - BZCa7 M1C lor. Mtcrofljtfi�'W[ i bbcud Marcia r M Nti. v In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February -3- 19 76 In the Matter of Acceptance of Check for Judgment in case of Contra Costa County Flood Control v. United States (Court of Claims #392-73) Mr. John B. Clausen, County Counsel, having submitted a check in the amount of $30,000 issued by the Federal Government to pay the judgment entered against it in the case of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District v. United States (Court of Claims b4392-73); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid check is ACCEPTED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. i herby certify that the foregoing k a true and correct copy of an order entered on the nunutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date ofar mkL cc: County Counsel Witne s my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller SuPorvisors Public Works Director omd this 3rd dav of February 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Treasurer-Tax Colle d o Deputy Clerk r y -� ep ri Maxine M.. Ndufeld 00,112 H 24 W75 lam r ..,.,.y,,. +E ,.,:..: fir.,., _. ... :.. ,. ....,.: <_: . :a,t•ir .:.� w. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19- 76 In the Matter of Comments from Various Cities on County Solid Waste Management Plan. The Board having received communications from various city councils advising of their actions on the draft of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Plan (adopted by the County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee on November 5, 1975) as follows: a. City of Walnut Creek - approved as submitted; b. City of San Pablo - approved with conditions; c. City of El Cerrito - approved as submitted with comments by certain Council members; d. City of Pittsburg - concurred but expressed concern about certain matters; e. City of Richmond - approved with certain conditions; and f. City of Lafayette - approved but did not concur with "suggested findings"; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the afore- said information is AWNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify HKO the foregoing is a true and correct a" of an order entered on the minutes of said Boord of Supervisors an the date oforesakL cc: Cities shown above Wenew my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Srb+p Environmental Control affixed this 3rd dor of PP �w 19 F Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County health Officer County CounselBye' �f '��.:C' ll . Deputy Clerk County Administrator Helen C. Marshall 04.E-113 H Aps IOM I M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 .76 in the Maher of Report of Bay Area Sewage Services Agency with respect to Water Quality Management. The Board having received a January, 26, 1976 letter from Mr. Ralph C. Bolin, President, Bay Area Sewage Services Agency advising that its Special Committee has completed an evaluation and report of the Agency's role and effectiveness in water quality management for the San Francisco Bay Region, and inviting comments on same; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid report is REFERRED to the Public Works Director (Environmental Control). PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregaing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea of the Board of cc: Mr. Ralph Bolin SuPWVbors President, BASSA affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 Public Works J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Environmental Control ,} Director of Planning BY `!`� - Deputy Clerk County health Officer Bonnie Boaz County Administrator 0414 H 24 8"S lout E 0 baivoo - Memorandum File: Date: 1-21-76 To: Agency Board From: Jack D. Haltester, Chairnan, Special Committee Subject: Report of BASSA Special Committee At its meeting of July 16, 1975, the Agency Board of Trustees established a Special Committee consisting of the President and Chairmen of standing committees for the purpose of reviewing the position of the. Agency with regard to its original charge from the State Legislature and the relationship of Agency staff to that position. The Committee has met over the past several months with representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Association of Bay Area Governments, and Assemblyman John T. Knox to determine the most effective role for the Agency to play in the management of water pollution control in the Region. It was felt by the Committee that best determination of Agency direction could be made through clarification with other agencies active in the water pollution control field of the Agency's standing as defined by the Legislature in the overall planning, implementation, and enforcement picture. The enabling legislation of BASSA set forth two basic tasks for the Agency to accomplish: 1. Development and Adoption of a Regional Plan for Water Quality Management Because of delays in legislative enactment, the State Water Resources Control Board and California Regional Water Quality Control Boards had made substantial progress in the development of a Basin Plan for the Region before BASSA began to function as a regional agency. This was recognized early through the adoption of a Memorandum of Understanding with the State and Regional Boards and BASSA in which BASSA agreed in an effort to avoid duplication and cost of stork to adopt the Basin Plan as its Plan. BASSA's enabling legislation mandated the adoption of the Plan not later than January 1, 1974, but by that date there was only a tentative Basin Plan for this area and that Was adopted by BASSA. This year the final Basin Plan for the San Francisco Bay Region was adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board. BASSA is now in the process of completing its adoption of that Plan In the form of an amendment to our existing Plan. There is one important distinction, namely, that the BASSA Board of Trustees has developed and certified an Environmental Impact Report for the Plan prior to its adoption. In addition, the Agency Board has adopted an action program for project coordination which, among other activities, calls for development of accurate and timely implementation schedules for local and subregional water quality :anagement programs as set forth in the Regional Plan. Aticrositmed wiiz i4?ClCcl order WWII i Y w These time schedules are developed by Agency staff with advise and comment of the responsible local agencies and are adopted by the Agency Board through formal resolution. The adopted schedules are the base upon which Agency project surveillance, coordination and implementation activities are enacted. The basic planning for water pollution control for Section 201 facilities is completed. Further planning work is being accomplished by the Section 203 process under the direction of ABAG with staff assistance of BASSA provided by contract. 208 planning will address the comprehensive environmental issues of air quality, water quality and land use planning and interrelationships of these three basic areas: The process will require another two years to complete, with program implementation even farther down the road. It is the Committee's recommendation that an Agency Board policy be adopted that 201 facilities plans be implemented with all speed in the Bay Region during the planning process of 203. 2. Regional Plan Implementation It is clear that BASSA's most effective role is that of implementation of the Plan. This is acknowledged by the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Board in that the Memorandum of Understanding states, among other things, that it is BASSA's respon- sibility to: "Use the Basin Plan as the basis for subsequent planning and implementation for which it is responsible pursuant to Division 9 of the California Water Code." The Chairman of the State Board has advised, "In our view (the State Board) BASSA's role in planning is limited to planning for implementation, including identification of the agencies responsible for construction and operation of the municipal and industrial wastewater facilities established in the Basin Plan together with timetables for their construction and methods for their financing." BASSA's legislation defines three methods of implementation for the Plan, namely (1) construction and operation of facilities by BASSA; (2) review of applications for financial assistance;.and (3) review of local plans. Construction and Operation of Facilities by BASSA: Practical experience in this area of implementation, particularly with the Stinson Beach problem, emphasizes the need for legislative amendment to the BASSA Act for the purpose of strengthening our-ability to finance construction where the proposed improvements have been rejected by the people of the area. It is proposed that the section under implementation dealing with the :.-onstruction and operation of water quality control facilities where a local agency does not wish to proceed or cannot proceed be strengthened. The problems of the current language of the BASSA Act have been reviewed in a consultant's report by Bartle Fells and Associates on financing alternatives for wastewater management in Stinson Beach, California. Water Code Section 16682, subdivision (d) implements authority to levy taxes, collect services or use charges and obtain revenue from other sources for the "area served by the facilities". This restriction should be removed so as to broaden the base for financing projects which may s y - 001 iq i w f t have to be constructed under BASSA's authority. In addition, there should be further references developed with the assistance of the Legislative Counsel's office to clear any ambiguities with respect to adoption and use of the assessment procedures under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. In conjunction with procedures for introduction of possible legislative amendment as described, it is the Committee's recommendation that opinion of Legislative Counsel be obtained regarding interpretation of Water Code Section 16682 which gives the Agency the authority "... as provided in the County Sanitation District Act, Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 4700) . .." regarding definition of "area of benefit" for purposes of Agency formation of assessment district for construction and/or operation of facilities. It has been suggested that the Agency Board, after proper hearings, et cetera, could define an area of benefit according to direct or indirect affect on an area adjacent to the site of proposed facility. It is felt tbzt such an interpretive definition under existing statute should be explored in the event a legislative amendment could not be made. Review of Applications for Financial Assistance: BASSA has now adopted the ordinance required in its Act setting forth a procedure and providing standards and criteria to be followed in reviewing applications for financial assistance. BASSA has been involved in the A-95 review process through the forwarding of review notifications from ABAG, the agency designated by the federal government for the basic A-95 review in this area. Examination of BASSA's staff participation in this review process confirms the need for improving and strenghthening this process. ,The Agency has contracted with ABAG for staff services of a.Regional Planner III who has been assigned the task of developing detailed, in- house procedures for grant application review and to initiate a system of control for A-95 reviews to assure active and timely participation by the Agency in the process. Facilitation of Grant Applications: Because of the expertise of members of the Board of Trustees in the field of wastewater management, BASSA can perform the most important function of rendering assistance to facilitate expeditious processing of grant applications for wastewater management projects. This Agency could act as a very effective clearing- house of information and procedure mechanisms; it could bring together the experiences and pitfalls of various applicants for grant aids; and it could offer constructive suggestions to aid local agencies in perfecting grant procedures so as to receive reasonably prompt action. When this was discussed by Committee, it was believed that some legisla- tive change would be required to give BASSA this authority. It is suggested, however, that the legislative mandate of the present Act (Water Code Section 16003) which assigns to BASSA "the responsibility for the coordination of planning water quality control facilities" interpretively gives BASSA all the authority it needs to act in this clearinghouse capacity. 11 Review of Local Plans: This review process must be developed more intensively so that there is an established procedure as mandated under our Act to review all plans for water quality control facilities which relate to or substantially affect matters within the scope of the Regional Water Quality Management Plan. This would appear to be a most important area since the projects for which applications for financial assistance are sought actually are imple- mentations of these plans. It would appear better to determine any lack of conformance with the Regional Plan in the planning stage rather than when detailed application for implemeatation has been developed and submitted for financing. Staff expertise in the review of plans has been gained through contract with ABAG. The Agency staff follows development of local plans In-all phases in order to preclude the possibility of a local plan being in non-conformance with the adopted Regional Plan. Summary and Recommendations It is the Committee recommendation that the Agency actively and aggressively pursue Implementation of the adopted Regional Water Quality Management Plan. The three legislatively mandated areas for Agency implementation are discussed above, and should proceed in a most responsible manner. To this end, it is the Committee's determination that Agency relations with other governmental and private agencies concerned with water pollution control be strenthened and that support of, particularly, the State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Board be actively pursued. It has also been brought to the attention of the Committee and the Agency Board that public interest and education in water pollution control programs should be increased. The massive expenditures necessary to provide clean waters for the San Francisco Bay Region and to seek alternatives to disposal of wastewater, such as through reclamation and reuse, are matters of public concern and should be brought to the attention of the taxpayers in order that their full support for this important environmental program be gained. The cost of wastewater management is enormous. Every effort must be made by public agencies responsible for the program to avoid duplication at every level_ It is the Committee's recommendation that the Agency's Regional Services Program be continued and that efforts be made to solve common problems in water pollution control at a regional level. The current regioaal residuals management study headed by East Bay Municipal Utility District with Agency participation is an example of the program proposed. In addition, exchange of staff services between existing agencies for clerical, accounting, and particular expertise should be investigated to reduce costs of the overall program to the taxpayers of the Region. t - i . j la In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 7s; In the Matter of Tenant Positions on Board of Commissioners of Housing Authority of Contra Costa County. The Board having received a letter from Ids. Linda Locke Sousa, President of Board of Directors, East County Resource Center, stating that guidelines of Senate Bill 1127 provide for appointment of two tenants to the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County, and requesting that Ms. Jo Quiinn, 2212 Yukon Street, Concord, California 94520 be appointed to fill one of the positions; IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REPERRED to County Counsel for report on actions which must be taken by this Board. PASSED by the Board on ?ebruarY 3, 1976. I hereby cer* that the foregoing is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisor:on the date aforesaid. cc: Ms. Linda Locke Souza 1N'eness my hond and the Seal of the Boord of 999 Railroad Ave. Supervisors Pittsburg, CA 9 565 alf0e this 3rd day of February 19 IL County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By AL L,,J C *-el Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00,119 H 24 W75 ILOM I Hifi► that the foregoing is a true and oorred eM of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Superwbors on the date oforesW& W-dnea my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Isis. Linda Locke Souza Supervisors 999 Railroad Ave. mixed "_'� o fl—eh l= , 19 1.. Pittsburgs CA 94565 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel County Administrator t� �-��'' Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00.119 H 2; U75 IGO In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Februarx 3 19 Z6 In the Matter of Financial Assistance for Rubicon, Inc. The Board having recefired a January 16, 1976 letter Prost Assemblyman d. T. Knox tranodtting a request from Rubicon, Inc., Richmond# for assistance in o Wng funding for its Mental Health Care Progrsa in the western area of the County, and urging Board consideration of the tatter; IT IS BZ THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Director, Rimian Resources Agency for report. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 _' 1976 In the Matter of Financial Assistance for Rubicon, Inc. The Board having received a January 16, 1976 letter from Assemblyman J. T. Knox transmitting a request from Rubicon, Inc., Ricbmoad, for assistance in obtaining wading for its Dental Health Care Program in the western area of the County, and urging Board consideration of the natter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency for report. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 19760 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the dam oforesaid. Ccs Asseeeblyman J. T. Knox w'tneu my hand and the Sial of the Board of Rubicon, Inc. &Wwvbcn Director, Human Resources affixed this3rd day of February . 1976 Agency dainistratOr J. R. OLSSON, Clerk CountBy, _ A Deputy clerk Rondal Shackles H 24 OPS IOM P is l 9 I j ---------------------- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California FebrmM 3 -, 1976- In 19Z6.In the Matter of Reimbursement for Services as a Tewiporary Deputy Narwhal. The Board having received a February 2, 1976 letter from Mr* Manuel Le dunes requesting reimbursement for his services as a temporary Deputy Marshal in the Mt. Diablo Marshal's Office* IT IS BT THE BOARD ORDERED that this request is REFERRED to the Mt. Diablo Marshal's Office, the County Auditor-Controller: and County Counsel. PASSED by the Hoard on February 39 1976- I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and come copy of an order entered on the minutes of scud Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cci Kr. Manuel Le Runes Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mt. Diablo Marshal•s Sup° "fors Office affixed this 3rd d" of February. 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk TTttTstrat.ar Deputy Clerk Ronda4nn, Sha es 00:-1,2" H 24 app low i t 6t6 In the Board of Supervisors k of k Contra Costa County, State of California $. _ r} February 3 197.fL- Inn the Matter of Employment or Instructors by , Kensington Community Service < District. ' Supervisor J. P. Kenny having called attention to a January 27, 1976 letter he had received from Mr. W. E. 01st, General Manager, Kensington Community Service District, requesting information as to the legality of the District's employment of recreational instructors and others such as nursery school x� - teachers, under Section 61600 of the Government Code; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the ratter is REFERRED to County Counsel for review and °report. � rx PASSED by the Board. on February 3, 1976. $ t r 3 s; 1 herby certify that the foregoing is a true and aorred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of cc: Kensington Community , Service District mixed this of TAh=L ry , 19 County Counsel lerk County Administrator z' J. R. OLSSON, C ByDePutY Clerk " y Mary 4r, aig x < 00422 H 24 ORS 10M , H24 SP5 lout i i s a i A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California February 3 19 76 r = ® In the Moder of Application for Grant of an Open-Space Easement. The Board having received a January 27, 1976 letter from Attorney William G. Broderick, on behalf of Diablo Bowmen, requesting an answer with respect to an application made March 10; 1975 for grant of an open-space easement in the Mt. Diablo area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the County Administrator for response. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred copy of an ardor onto on tlhar minutes of said Board of Super6som on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. William G. Broderick Wane" my frond and the Seat of the Board of Supervisors County Administrator Attn: Gary Brown ofbged this 3rd day of February , ig 76 Director of Planning J_ R. OLMN, Clark County Counsel By puty..�.t-��4-1�-1r�lf ., ,,� . DeClerk Rob bi GAierrez/ 00423 7 �'� '• ti 2i+�>tj75 2061 .. t� T . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Matter of Federal Voting Rights Act. The Board having received a January 26, 1976 letter from Mr. James S. 'tile, Executive Officer, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors , advising that the Los Angeles County Counsel has been instructed to file suit to challege the validity of the Federal Voting Rights Act requiring a bilingual ballot, and urging this county to take similar action; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is referred to the County Clerk-Recorder, County Counsel and County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I hereby aertify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order ordered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesakL cc: Los Angeles County M/itness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board of Supervisors supervisors County Clerk-Recorder affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Robbie Sut3 rrez L^.) Q0-124 H 24 8/75 IOU In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 - --, 197.6- In , 197.6-in the Matter of Amendment to Government Code Sections Related to Competitive Bidding. The Board having received a January 20, 1976 letter from the Chairman, County Supervisors Association of California Trans- portation Policy Advisory Committee, requesting the Board to indicate its position on resolutions adopted by the Fresno County Board of Supervisors which propose revisions of certain Government Code sections related to requirements for formal competitive bidding and monetary limits on public works projects; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the proposed legislations are REFFaM to the County Administrator and the Public storks Director for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on February 39 2976• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boord of cat County 3upertiso�rs Supervisors Asaociaticn of affixed this 3rd day of February . 19 76 California d. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Public trorks Director eputy Clerk County Counsel Rondal Shackles 00,125 H 24 W75 IOM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 1976 In the Matter of Traffic Conditions at _ Wait Disney Elementary School , San Ramon Area. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having brought to the attention of the Board a January 30, 1976 letter he had received from Hr. Harry L. York, Administrative Aide to Assemblyman Daniel E. Boatwright, advising of traffic congestion at the entrance of the Walt Disney Elementary School , Pine Valley Road, San Ramon area, and requesting assistance in improving conditions in said area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Public Works Director for report as to whether County policy would permit cor- rective action. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and eorredt copy of an order entered on the Minutes of said Boord of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Harry L. York ��;� Public Works Director affixed this 3rd day of February , 19 76 Director of Planning County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By /:�✓��� _.; - Deputy Clerk Robbie Gutierrez 00426 H 24 4"s lam f e t � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 7fj- In the Matter of Traffic Conditions in the Vicinity of Via Hermosa, Orinda Area. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having called attention to a January 26, 1976 letter he had received from Mr. Peter Kristich, President of the Board, Hacienda Homes, Inc. , Orinda, transmitting letters from residents in the vicinity of Via Hermosa expressing concern with hazardous traffic conditions caused by excessive speed and urging that consideration be given to the installation of certain "advisory signs"; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and corned copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc : Hacienda Homes, Inc. Supervisors Public Works Director affixed for aed this— � �rd_doy of ehr_ui y . 19 7�F Director of Planning County Adminis'rator /7J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz '- 00427 M 24 Ws IOU n..rtN.,rrs- t;. -- - - • t - ffiviem Names, An RECEIUD �'►� POW�sox 267 �• 2 B 1976 000A.CAUFORI"94563 SUPWSOR IIORAW Jamary 26, 1976 Supervisor James E. Moriarty Third District 3338 Mit. Diablo BoW evard FE A, Lafayette, Ca 94549 Iczzc 64;t; c sura r;z0'S Dear Supervisor Moriarty: t ca. Hacienda Homes, Inc. has received several letters from residents on Via Hermosa and neighboring streets submitting complaints of hazardous conditions prevailing in the area of Five Corners; i.e., La Espirai, Via Hermosa, La Vuelta and La Campana.Y These letters are attached. The complaints are justifiable and suggested recommendations appropriate. You will note from the correspondence that this problem has been referred before to the County with no action being taken. The residents are con- cerned and rightfully so. We will certainly appreciate your investigation into this matter and your cooperation to see that corrective measures are taken before a tragic accident occurs. Very truly yours, i HACIENDA HOMES, INC. Af,- 41 Peter Kristich President of the Board PK:ne Enclosures cc: R. L. Wilson, Jr. G. Burke S. Greennings D. Doten J. D. Westphal Ule 00428 Microfilmed with board order ,r b I ' 14 Via Hermosa Grinda La. Jan.7, 1976 Hacienda Homes RECEIVED ►.�N � � 1�7� P. O. sax 267 President of the Board PK:ne Enclosures cc: R. L. Wilson, Jr. G_ Burke S. Groennings D. Doten J. D. Westphal 00428 A iuofiimed with board order I 14 Via Hermosa (f►in:c ,Ca. J3n.7, 1976 !� Hacienda Homes RECEIVE ,'*N O 6197$ P. 0. Boz 267 FEB-5) 1976 Orinda,Ca. J. IL OUSM am toAm o: su rjaM Gentlemen: When we bought our home at 14 t�ia Hermosa last spring we did so thinking we would be on a cuiet,relatively safe,deadend street. We have 2 biking age ch-ildren and one toddler. Since Orinda has no sidewalks, bike riding,visits to friends and walking to the school bus stop all involve being on the street. Although Via 3etmmsa is not a through street and traffic here Is limited to residents, their friends and service trucks ,quite a number of those vehicles travel at an alarming speed along our little street. A couple of times while pushing any toddler in the stroller I was nearly pushed off the road by teenage drivers taking a curve too fast. Some of the fast drivers are local teenagers and friends visiting them, some are the servicetrucks in a big rush to get to their "job",and some are adult residents who simply aren't aware that there are nearly a dozen children under age 12 living on Via Hermosa now. I have stopped many cars and talked to the drivers about the problem and the response has been favorable,however in order to reach all the incoming drivers,several signs must be put up by the county. I recommend the -following : 1.) A sign indicating that children play on Via Hermosa. 2. ) 15 MPH signs upon entering Via Hermosa and at both curves. 3.) A sign indicating t=at Via Hermosa is not a through street. '+.) Stop signs at via Hermosa,La Vuelta, and La Campagna making La Espiral a through street ( which it has essen- tially become allready. 5.) A sign indicating that 5 corners is a major school bus stop-so that %a Espiral traffic will approach with caution ( over 40 children tact the bus to and from school here '-rom 7 tnru 3. A _DDL) %da Hermosa is ziat a short cut to the freeway,speeding into it will Gniv zet sat^eone home 2 seconds faster and soeeding cut G-f it is useless since 5 corners necessitates a slowdoc.-n to ld M?H. The advantages to ^vine 25 to 35 and more are r_ealigible, the sisadvant.agas are cGns�.�erable. At La Espiral and Car-_ino Sobrante a 15 MTH sign is oast�!d ,it is called an 'advisory sign" by traffic engineers and City Hall and 1 C-ink its just the kind of advise 00-1429 u,.zp needed on Via Hermosa, in the past two vears there have been several attempts by Phe people living here to get the county to do something to slow the traffic down,but the county has been very uncooperative. We hope that Hacienda Homes will now help us in our effort to make Via Hermosa as safe as it is beautiful. Please feel free to call me at any time if 1 may be of help_ 8icerel , 1 Burke 00;1130 F j E • a 14 via ffermosa Lcinda ,Ca. aa. 13, 1976 : RECEIVED . o Haciendanda Howes FEB 3 1376 ECEIVED Hux 267 .,;;# Z 81976 Lrinda ,Ca. 94563 OMI"VEMUMM $UMVISOR MORM. Ladies & Gent l ..M, "• As residents of Via flerm osa we are alarmed at the rate of weed many vehicles travel along our quiet ,dead-end street. Many of us love to take walks ales;; this beautiful street and since i there are no sidewalks,we must share the road with the moving v�:hict�::. P:•eu a U.I.- an a4ult cr child has had to nfulckly move • aside to Let a velete:Le rush past. • via Hermosa is unique street. It is out a shortcut.to the freewnyp ;it is not even a through street, thus,there is no reason for vcj'icles to travel faster than 15 NPif . Drivers entering Via Hermc:sa are going to a home, about to park. Drivers leaving via Hermosa must nearly stup at the 5 corners intersection. Speads faster than 15 mph in these situations merely waste gas and jeopardize the walking environment . We urge Hacienda flumes to go to the county and recommend • the installation of the following signs which will inform drivers that Vt:s flerwasa is a s f.ecial street-not just for vehicles but fur peuple,tou! w:t's make %is Hermosa as safe as It is beautiful. Signs. 1. Children play con iia Hermosa (there are nearly a dozen under age 12 living here now). Via Herws- is not a through street. and* 3. Stop signs should be ic.stalleJ at Via Rermosa Lee Vuelta, c,a?pagna and school bus stop caution signs un botf: sides of La Espiral : (5 corners is a major school bus stop-ever 40 children are pickei up and droppeJ ulf there between 7 ar•• and '1;30 I= every weekday. We :should insure that cars a:utering from the 5 streetsappraach with caution ). 4. 15 mph signs upon entering Via Hermosa and at Both curves. Sincerely yours, he;dress:30114 • � 00431 It, via Nermosa Grinda ,Ga. Jan. 131 1976 ECF VED aE C E I W E Hac:ienca Homes rux 261 FEBS 19176 .4 Z 6 1976 t;rinda ,ca. 94553 ° °"' C aouc� SUPERVISOR MORMTY mc a= w . ='N � t co. Ladies � Gent l �°r, As residents of via Hermosa we are alarmed at the rate o_f speed many vehicles travel along our quiet ,dear!-end street. Hany cf us love to take walks along tris beautiful street and since there are no sidewalks,we must share the road with the moving vehic 1 L-Atty a t;- an aJu!t L,r chi ld Las :Died tcs iqui.ckly move aside to let a veliic ie rush yeast. cia Hermosa is unique street. It is not a shortcut to the ireewav ;it is not riven a through street, thus,there is no reason for vehi:tes to travel faster than 15 NPH . Drivers entering. Via Hermusa are going to a home, about to park. Drivers leaving via Hermosa wu3t nearly stop at the 5 corners intersection. Speeds faster than 15 mph in these situations merely uaste gas and jeopardize the walking environment . .1c urge hacienda Humes to go to the county and recommend tete installation of the following signs which will inform drivers that Via Hermosa i, a special street-not just for vehicles but for peuple,too: Let's wake ., ia Hermosa as safe as it is heautiful. Signs: 1. Children play on iia Hermosa (there etre nearly a dozen udder age 12 living here now). 2. Via Hermosa is not a through street. 3. Stop signs should be iustalleu at 4ia Hermosa La Vuelta, and La Gawpa a an., school bus stop caution signs on botfe sides of La Espiral . (.) c_Grners is a major school bus stop-over 40 chil,Jren are laic::zcl up an, dropped uit there bet:-ieen 7 am and 30 pin every neel.rday. We should insure that czars entering from the 5 streetsapproach with caution ). 4. 15 mph signs upon entering Via Hermosa and at both curves. p)) �M� s ! . sine ely yours, down r Name: • �/W Vt � IT + i{— d'j �i �l ez�d res s: ife mom P z Vi&3 00 a 3*2 14 Ilia flermosa ' t,rinda ,Ga. Jan. 13, 1976 REMEIVED Hacienda limes VEL .. .flax 267 Y.01976 t.rinda ,ca. 9456FEB 1976 $UPFRVISOR IV�RIARi1f. Ladies & Gentleme -cap Walwams As r"sidents of Via Hermosa we a alarmed at the rate of s .reed many vehicles travel aiang our quiet ,dead-encs street. bhwy of us lave to take walks alon;- this beautiful street and since there are no sidewalks,we must share the roan with the moving vihictc•:. L-111y .1 tiny- an amoult or child has had fru •quickly move aside to let a vehic Le rush past. Mia Hermosa is unique street. It is nut a shortcut to the freeway ;it is not even a through street, thus,there is no reason for vehicles to travel faster than 15 MPH . Drivers entering via Hermosa are going to a home, about to park. Drivers leaving via Hermosa must nearly stop at the 5 corners intersection. speeds Caster t1an 13 mplo in these situations merely waste gas and jeopardize the walking environment . ttc urge Hacienda flumes to go to the county and recommend the installation of the following signs which will inform drivers that V1J flexr-osa is a al•ecial street-nut just for vehicles but for peuple,too! fret's mace %ia Hermosa as safe as it is beautiful. Si as: 1. Children play un iia fie , r sa (there are nearly a dozen under age 12 living here now). . Via Hermosa. is not a through street. 3. Stop signs should be lirstalleJ at Via 1:ermosa La Vuelta, and LA t;amparna and schuol bas stop caution signs on bott= sides of Ira Espirai . (S corners is a major school hus stop-over 40 chileren are picked ap and droppe.l ;.If there betwocn 7 aw and ..3 J in every weekday. de rtiruuld insure that cars entering fre,ae the 5 streetsapproach with caution ). 4. 15 mph signs upon entering Via Ifermoso and at both curves. Sincerely urs, w� Name• : Lss 00400 ,, •,. , j ,aJE-r " -1 k i.P-L.L - yt►.:+�c:..i I :t:i• anal tin, every week-day. Oe should insure that cars entering from the 5 streetsapproach kith caution ). curves.G. 15 mph signs upon entering Via IEermosa and at bath SincerelY#ours, `n Name:A,:dress: r 00}- 33 R&Y L, waso_, Js. REF � C"RIVED _ January 12, 197 k FEB3 E LOWEIVE - Q - . .1. zaLSSON .M2b1976 � - eot crn C=A Co. HAcaExo�► HOMEs �► ~' SUPERYESOR lORiTY '~ P. O. Box 267 Orinua, California 94Sv'3 Gentlemen: We would like to take this opportunity in soliciting ' your help in obtaining from Contra Costa County, stop - signs at Five Corners in Orinda, i.e. La Espiral, Via Hermosa, La Vuelta, and La Campana. z , We feel that La Espiral should be made the thru street and stop signs placed at Via Hermosa, La Campana, and # ! La Vuelta. My reasons for wanting these stop signs are: _ a) Five Corners is a major school bus stop (kinder- f garten through high school) , and in the early hours and afternoon many children are at the inter- section. Presently there are no warning signs at all and it is an extremely dangerous situation. b) There are now seven children under the age of 8 � . in the first five homes next to the intersection of Via Hermosa and Five Corners, plus many other children who relate to the Five Corner intersection. Via Hermosa is of particular concern, not only because we live there, but also because it is the ' only straight and level street relating to the ; . Five Corner area and consequently a popular place -. for children to ride bikes, play ball, etc. Many 4 { 00,43' r Page Two Hacienda Homes January 12, 1976 children in the entire neighborhood collect on Via Hermosa to play. Obviously, we are greatly concerned for their safety and have put up our own "slow - children at play" signs, �. however, they seem to vanish in the night. We and the rest of the residents along Via Hermosa who have children see no other solution than to install stop signs at the aforementioned Five Corner intersection. i . We intend to contact the County of Contra Costa, however, f when this has been tried in the past, no results have been achieved. If you have any ideas on how you might . _ - help us with this problem, they will be greatly appreciated. z . Yours truly, Rayd Mary Wilson One Via Hermosa ' Orinda, California f RLW:bb � k y k .0 135 • f f M I� 11� ;•J'.J I RM t In the Board of Supervisors - of Contra Costa County, State of California L February 3 . 19 76 In the Matter of Report of the Special Committee on Underground CATV Systems. This being the time fixed for the report of the Special. Committee {Supervisors J. P. Kenny and E. A. Linscheid) on pro- cedures pertaining to installation of underground CATV systems in new developments; and Supervisor Linscheid having reported that on February 2, 1976 staff met with representatives 'from the Associated Building Industries and CATV firms in an unsuccessful attempt to reach an equitable solution; and Supervisor Linscheid having remarked that he believes there is room for compromise, recommended that staff again confer with representatives from the aforesaid groups to effect an agree- able solution, and further recommended that the Board defer making a decision for one week; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of Supervisor Linscheid are APPROVED and February 10, 1976 is fixed as the date for Board decision. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the report of the Special Committee is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ce• Mr. Bill Horne Wtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. Dean P. LaF'ield Super Mr. Tom Coll affixed this 3rd day of February. 1976 County Administrator , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L K ter' ! .P 41' ''__f)C �� ' Deputy ClerkBonnie Boaz 00438 H N 3/7S 101 _ 1 S M i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California February 3 . 19 76 In the Matter of Saline Intrusion in the Delta. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having read a statement on the threat that salinity intrusion could have on the Delta and water quality in the County of Contra Costa; and Supervisor Linscheid having expressed the opinion that the domestic supply within the boundaries of the Contra Costa County Water District should be the responsibility of the East Bay Municipal Utility District; and The Board members having concurred that the situation was serious, REQUESTED the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) to meet with representatives of the aforesaid districts and discuss the possibility of an exchange of water. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board Committee Supervisors County Administrator affixed thh 3rd day of February , 1g 76 Public Works Director — Environmental Control J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r Deputy Clerk Crai H 24 8/75 10M 'i SUPERVISOR EDMUND A L1NSCNEJD 50ARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPERVISOR WARRr_P,. v 60GGE55 ST. C-ISTRIcT •l TT"Uaa _ CONT CC3STi1 COUNTY � �� VPT } • s suPYRv'so:i -A."as ;W /cgs P.Y r L ..r 45 (..it l4: AvEIYUYFC;..M..i.iMAA h?TSSURG. CAi.FCRrY.i► 9L�Q�. weG.Ira.�3 I SNPLXV=R ALFRED M. DIAS February 3, 1976 ►.i..o .. �.•�;� 5:1P=RVISOs= E?�tu7MD :.. LIV5GhE1? a--RK 03a0 Q SW wJ'atM r♦tsssuRc •:t^ A Co. _..�. M SUP9AWSCR JAMES E. MORIARTY BY 1•.{T AY L!TZ P R E S S R E L E A S E For Immediate Release Supervisor Linscheid ca=ented as follows today on the salinity intrusion now occurring in the Delta: "I fully understand that an emergency situation in the Delta-does not exist as yet. However, the rapid movement of salinity into the Delta, due to low rainfall, does threaten that kind of a situation. I do *scant the people of Contra Costa County to know that it is becoming quite clear to me that domestic supply within the boundaries of the Contra Costa County Water District should be the responsibility of the East 3ay Municipal utility District with its well protected and high quality water source. "If this present drought continues, and the water impounded behind federal and state dames becomes depleted, not only agricultural and industrial water quality but also the water quality at the intake of the Contra Costa Canal will, in time, become seriously degraded. The farmers in the Delta that are dependent on their irrigation supply frog the waterways in. the Delta are still able to get along. This nay not be the case with other farmers who are dependent on rainfall to irrigate their crops. -more- i Microfilmed with board order "The mater district, I understand, has abandoned their pcmrping U .4 _..ii, " #.L ., uer.L,e seriously degraded. The farmers in the Delta that are dependent on their irrigation supply from the waterways i1„ the Delta are still able to get along. This may not be the case with other farmers who are dependent on rainfall to irrigate their crops. -more- Maofitmed with board order G "The water district, I understand, has abandoned their pumping operations at Mallard Slough and the City- of Antioch has had to forego iising San Joaquin River water. I would presume that some of thein- dustries have had to do the same. "H'hat is interesting to me as a layman is the fact that the Contrd- Costa Canal is taking in water of adequate quality at their Rocs Slough intake, even with this so called drought situation. It appears to me that this is due to the fact that the Federal Central Valley Project and the State hater Project have accelerated their pumping of Delta water to the San Joaquin Valley and Southern California. In order to do this, they have to release water out of their reservoirs down .the Sacramento River, not because they necessarily want to, but because they have to, in order to assure good quality grater for their customers down south. "I want to say that this is the time for the people to take a look at whether or not they still want to remain dependent on a water"supply .whose quality is subject to manipulation by the federal and state govern- ments.11 -30- } 04439 l 7� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATS OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Appeal of ) Mr. Alfred G. Schwartz from ) action of the Board of ) Appeals on Application ) February 3, 1976 No. L.U.P. 2047-75, Clayton ) Area. } } The Board having heretofore fixed this date for decision on the appeal of !fir. Alfred G. Schwartz from certain revised conditions of approval (?.os. 1 and 8) imposed by the Board or Appeals in connec- tion with L.U.P. 2047-75 to enlarge a non-conforming use (trucking yard), Clayton area; and Mr. N. L. Halverson of the Planning Department staff having reviewed the proposal; and Supervisor S. A. TAnscheid having stated that in his opinion the permit should not be restricted to a certain length of time since the existing use was not objectionable to adjoining property owners and development of the surrounding area was unlikely; that non-transferability of the permit would impose a hardship on the family should it become necessary to sell the business; and that the limitation on the number of trucks should be retained; and Mr. Gordon B. Turner, attorney for the applicant, having advised that his client would be agreeable to limiting the trucks to nine; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the appeal of Mr. Schwartz from Condition No. 1 be granted, his appeal from Condition No. 8 be denied as to the truck limitation, and L.U.P. 'Jo. 2047-75 be approved with the following conditions: (1) The proposed building shall be placed on the property so as to maintain a distance of 20-ft., from the northerly property line and 15-ft., from the easterly property line. (2) Parking and driveway areas shall be paved so as to prevent dust and ponding of water. (3) Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Health Department, as follows: (a) If plumbing facilities are required to be installed in the maintenance building, a septic tank permit will be required from the Health Department. (4) Comply with the requirements of the County Flood Control District, as follows: The installation of storm drainage facilities as stipulated in the County Ordinance Code (Title 9) shall be constructed in accor- dance with the recamsandations by the Flood Control District and the Building Inspection Department; and in particular: (A) Drainage releases shall be obtained from all property owners which receive those surface waters that either originate on or flow across the subject parcel to the location where these surface waters enter a natural water course. The natural water course is located approximately 100 to 150-ft., northwest of the access road to the subject parcel off of Marsh Creek Road. 4 I J N r r p (B) To help prevent flooding of this parcel as well as the parcel to the south of it, the culvert under the above-mentioned access road should be cleaned out periodically. The culvert inlet should be cleared of all brush and debris. The ditch below the culvert outlet should be daylighted downstream, 10 to 15-ft, (5) Comply with the requirements of the County Building Department. (6) Comply with the requirements of the County Public Works Department, as follows: (A) Dedicate to the County the most westerly corner of the subject property, not exceeding 10-ft., in width, as additional right-of-way for Marsh Creek Road according to the Precise Alignment Plan (Ref.PA 3971-69, Sheet 4 of 7). The Offer of Dedication will be prepared by the Public Works Department and must be executed by the owner before the building permit can be issued. (B) In accordance with Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be dedicated to Contra Costa County for road purposes should consent to the dedication of the right-of-way and should subordinate their rights to the rights of the public in the dedicated ardas. (C) Install all new utility services underground. (D) An encroachment permit must be obtained from the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, for driveway connections and other construction within the rights-of-way of Marsh Creek Road. (7) The number of trucks not to exceed nine (9) . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having expressed the opinion that a control was needed, that he was in favor of specifying a length of time for the permit and that he wished to indicate a "No" vote with respect to same. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal cc: Mr. A. G. Schwartz of the Board of Supervisors affixed Mr. G. B. Turner this 3rd day of February, 1976. Planning Department County Health Department J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Public Works Department Flood Control District Building Inspection p By Jean L. Miller Deputy Clerk 00-141 i s 6� 4 ve C f To: The Board of Supervisors '75 of Contra Costa County County Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 •. .,,, Re: Alfred G. Schwartz Applicant and Owner Application 110. i&67-75 Assessor's Parcel Pdo. 78-280-01 NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM DECISION OF PLARILLUG COMMISSION The hearing on the above application came before the Board of Adjustments on September % 1975. The Board granted the application for a non-conforming use to erect a truck garage building on the subje^.t premises subject to eight conditions. The applicant then filed an appeal to the Planning Commission of Contra Costa County as to conditions Nos. 1 and 8, which read as follows: "1. The Permit is issued to the applicant Alfred G. Schwartz only, and is not transferable." '28. This Permit shall be valid for a period of seven (7) years." At the conclusion of the hearing on the appeal, before the Planning Commission, the Commission revised conditions tilos. 1 and 8 referred to above to read as follows: "l. The permit is issued to the applicant Schwartz Truckry ng Company (Alfred, forma and Karl Schwartz) only, while they hold majority control of Company. "8. This permit shall be valid for a period of 12 years." and added a further condition, ~lamely: The number of trucks not to exceed nine." At the hearingsbefore the Board of Adjustments and the Planning Commission, Mr. Schwartz requested that the permit be issued for an unlimited period of time and that it be transferable for the following reasons: Mr. Schwartz first commenced in October 1949 his trucking business on the Schwartz lands on Marsh Creek. Road containing some 168 acres, of which Parcel 78-280-01 is a part, prior to any zoning; in 1966 the truck yard was relocated to its present site on Parcel 78-2 0-01 with approval of the County zoning authorities. He has conducted this business for some 26 years. He has a substantial financial investment :in the business. The present truck yard encompasses Microfilmed with board order 00-1, 42 iS Board of Supervisors Page 2 a total area of 1.34 acres; it is fully enclosed by a cyclone fence, paved with asphalt cement, and the driveway leading from Marsh Creek Road to the yard is likewise paved. The premises are well maintained. In 1972 the Schwartz ranch containing some 166+ acres, exclusive of Parcel 78-280-01, was placed in an Agricultural Preserve necessitating discontimiance of the use of a truck garage building at the Schwartz ranch headquarters now in said Agricultural Preserve. The present application is merely to erect a prefabricated metal truck storage building 241x4O1 on the , truck yard to enclose trucks for storage and for repairs and to store tools and supplies. The application is not one to "expand" a non-conforming use as denoted by the Planning staff; it is merely to replace the old truck storage building at the ranch headquarters with a new truck storage building on the truck yard. To impose the conditions that the permit be nontransferable, be limited for a period of 12 years and to limit the number of trucks to nine, is to seriously impair and diminish the value of a legitimate and substantial business that has been in operation for some 26 years. This business is the means of support for Mr. Schwartz and his family. In the event of his death or incapacity to continue the business,, he should be able to sell it. It is our contention the right of continuance of a previously existing use is a right inherent in the land so used and runs with the land and cannot be restricted to its transferability. There were no objections presented at the hearings before the Board of Adjustments or the Planning Commission to said application. 'There are some nine clump trucks presently stored on the premises, of which five are double unit bottom dump trucks and four are single body 3 axle dump trucks. The truck yard will be far more attractive if the maintenance and repair of trucks is carried on inside the building and if parts aid supplies can be stored within the building. To limit the number of trucks to nine is unreasonable. The time may come when Mr. Schwartz may convert his double unit bottom dump trucks to single units, requiring more trucks to conduct the same volume of business. Further, the limited area of 1.34 acres fully enclosed by a cyclone fence with a 241x40' building thereon will not allow room for the addition of a large number of trucks. O01 V3 Board of Supervisors Page 3 The building to be constructed is a prefabricated metal structure with painted aluminum sides and roof. Installation of the building and its plumbing and electrical facilities will run in the neighborhood of $15,700. WHEREFORE, applicant respectfully requests that conditions Nos. l and 8 be eliminated and that the further condition imposed by the Commission limiting the number of trucks to nine also be. , eliminated. Dated: November 19, 1975• ALFRED G. SCHWARTZ By-TURNER & HUGUET By Gordon B. Turner Attorneys for said Applicant F i 001-1-14 i y A a BEFORE THE BOARD OF APPEALS Contra Costa County, California In The flatter of Appeal of Land Use Permit Application 11047-75, ALFRED G. SCHAARTZ (Ap licant & Owner) - To expand a non-conform- ing use (Trucking Yard = Clayton Area. f 4EREAS, on Harcii 13, 1975, ALFRLD G. 5ChriARTZ (Applicant & Owner), filed a land use permit application to expand a non-conforming use, trucking yard; and I�HtRLM, the property is described as being a descriptive parcel fronting on the nortneast side of Harsn Creek Road, approximately 1]2 miles west of Morgan Territ- ory Road in the Clayton Area; and WiLRLAS, after Mice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing wds field by clue board of Adjustment on September 3, 1975, whereat all persons interested therein Wight appear and be neard; and whLktAS, the board of Adjustment fully considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence suiimitted APPROVED said application with conditions; and WHLRLAS, the decision of the Board of Adjustment was appealed by the appli- cant to the Loard of Appeals (full Planning Commission) on September i1, 1975; and WiEREAS, a public hearing on said appeal was had by the board of Appeals on Tuesday, October 20, 1975, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WEREAS, the board of Appeals fully considered and evaluated ail the test- inwny and evidence submitted at said public nearing GRIMED said appeal with revised conditions; and Wil, THEREFORL. bL IT R2LSOLVLD that the Land Use Permit of Alfred G. Schwartz jZ047-75, is APPROVED subject to the following conditions: (1) The peru►it is issued to the applicant, Schwartz Trucking Company, (Alfred, iturma and Karl Schwartz) only, while they hold majority control of the company. (1) The proposed building shall be placed on the property so as to main- tain a distance of 20-ft., from the northerly property line and l5-ft., from the easterly }property line. (3) Parking and driveway areas shall be paved so as to prevent dust and ponding of water. (4) Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Health Dept., as follows: (a) If plumiuing facilities are required to be installed in the maintenance building, a septic tank permit will be required from the Health Department. (5) Comply with the requirements of the County Flood Control District, as follows: The installation of storm drainage facilities as stipulated in the County Ordinance Code (Title 9) shall be constructed in accordance with the recommendations by b"Cro"'Med v,,tfh bc;ard order op i:� Land Use Permit, ALFRED G. SMArJL - x1047-7b / the Flood Control District and the building Inspection Department; and in particular: (A) Drainage releases snall be obtained from all property owners which receive those surface waters that either originate on or flow across the subject parcel to the location where these surface waters enter a natural water course. The natural water course is located approx- imately luO to lb►-ft., northwest of the access road to the subject parcel off of Harsh Creek Road. (8) To nelp prevent flooding of this parcel as well as the parcel to the south of it, the culvert under the above-mentioned access road should be cleaned out periodically. The culvert inlet should be cleared of all brush and debris. The ditch below the culvert outlet should be daylighted downstream, 10 to 15-ft. (o) Comply with the requirements of the County Building Department. (7) Comply with the requirements of the County Public Works Department, as follows: (A) Dedicate to the County the most westerly corner of the subject property, not exceeding 10-ft., in width, as additional right- of-way for tU rsh Creek Road according to the Precise Alignment Plan (Ref. PA 3971-69, Sheet 4 of 7). The Offer of dedication will be prepared by the Public Works Department and must be executed by the owner before the building permit can be issued. (6) In accordance with Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be dedicated to Contra Co,ta County for road purposes should consent to the dedication of the right-of-ray and should subordinate their rights to the rights of the public in the dedicated areas. (C) Install all new utility services underground. " (D) An enroachment permit must be obtained from the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, for driveway connections and other construction within the rights-of-way of Harsh Creek Road. (8) This perwit small ue valid for a period of 1" years. The number of trucks not to exceed nine (9). The foregoing was given by vote of the board of Appeals on Tuesday, October 9, 1972, in a regular meeting as follows: AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Jeha, Stoddard, Compaglia, Anderson, Walton. Young. docs: Commissioners - done. ABSENT: Commissioners - hone. ABSTALi: Comaissioners - none. AUDRLW H. YOUNG Chairman of 5e Planning Commission of the County Contra Co State of California DATE: 28 iiovember 1975 ATTEST: An y�ADIehaesus, Director Planning, ntr County Planning Vepart Th 4 uu�l earnnny L Pal a , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 3 , 19 76 In the Motter of Second Year Housing and Community Development Act Program and Application of Contra Costa County. The Board on January 20, 1976 and January 26, 1976 having held public hearings on the County's Second Year Housing and Community Development Act Program and application; and The Board having closed the public hearings and referred the matter to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) for review and comment; and The Committee having reviewed the Community Development Advisory Council recommendations in light of comments received; and The Committee having submitted a report recommending that the Board approve the Second Year Community Development Program, as recommended by the Advisory Council; and The Board having received and reviewed an Environmental Evaluation of the draft application for Community Development Block Grants submitted by the Director of Planning; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid Environmental Evaluation is ACKNOWLEDGED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute letters to the Association of Bay Area Governments and the State transmitting for their review the draft application for Community Development Block Grants of Contra Costa County and its participating cities as recommended by the Community Development Advisory Council. PASSED by the Board on February 3, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board Committee Director of Planning Supervisors Building Inspector affixed this 3rd day of February 19 76 Director, Human Resources J. R. OkSSON, Clerk Agency gy ,►� Deputy Clerk Economic Opportunity Program Aim Cra Director fZ County Counsel County Administrator (D) H 24 8175 IOM r i i r t . HEVISH) E)MI'T - 1129176 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS .tames EI. Kviiiiy JAMES P.KENNY.RJcw«oso , j{ LXitt�l�fik!iJfrgirk 1 4 DISTRILT G/Arnu.tta ALFRED$4,DIAS.SAM r bLa CONTRA COSTA COUNTY` waexxx rx xxrcrlK lNp DISTRICT 'i ICF. CNAIl1MhI1 JAMES E.MORIARM Lt\T#V[TTt AD111fi1STRATtaali BWLD11iG, RGOM fp3 JAMES R'.OL550". ;uu✓1ry ct.enK 3RO DISTRICT MMT LJt OFFV.10 CLfF114 OF THIO GOARO WARREN N•BOGGESS.4CVCORN P o. Bolt 911 MRS. GERALOINE RUSSELL QTN DISTRICT C1111F CLINK EDMUND A. UN="V1D. PITTSegoa MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 I•name zzn.10130 STN DISTRICT 9*11 WOW Z711R February 3, I976 REPORT OF COWTli GO ERNl E-W OPERATIONS C01411ITFE ON TIIE SECOND YEAR CWRWITI DEVELOMWNT PROGRAH AND APPLICATION On January 26, 1976 the Board of Supervisors referred to *.he County Government Operations Committee the Second Year Community Devel-pment Program and Application for review and report. Both were recommended by the,Community Development Advisory Council. The Government Operations Committee has consulted with Staff, members of the Advisory Council and knowledgable individuals regarding; housing assistance in East County, the need for a meeting place of the elderly in San Ramon tulle}. :and other matters brought to the attention of the Soard at the Public hearings of January' 20 and 26, 1976. The Committee is aware that the Community Development Advisory Council received nearly 90 activity suggestions, totaling eight million dollars, for funding this year. Most of these activity suggestions were eligible and worthy projects. However, since only approximately one million dollars was available for unincorporated area projects, most of the projects could not be funded. Recommendations of the Advisory Council were evolved after a lengthy and thorough review of activity suggestions, and the Council solicited and re- ceived much public participation and input during, its deliberations. In view of the above, and considering that the Advisory Council was established by the Board for the purpose of providing a recommendation on the Community Development Program, the Government Operations Committee recom- mends as follows: That the Board approve the Second Year Community Development Program and Application, as recommended by the Advisory Council, for submittal to the State and Area clearing houses. This submission to include the Environ- mental Evaluation. :1. Al. a' E. A. Litaacllcid t upervisory, rt !! Supervisor, District V 00 "1 AV Microfilmed with board order � I And the Board adjourns to meet on at _ 4.00 /911 , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California. . P-* Kenn_T. rman ATTEST: J. R. 0LS9DN, CLERK Deputy 00-149 i s SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, FEBRUARY 3, 1976, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved minutes of proceedings for month of January. 4 i f 00.1149 . _... �n , T_ SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CO.NMRA COSTA COUNTY, FEBRUARY 3, 1976, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved minutes of proceedings for month of January. Declared following numbered ordinances duly published: 75-52, 75-53, 76-15, 76-19. Approved personnel actions for County Counsel, Social Service, Civil Service, Medical, Services, Probation, Public Yorks and Sheriff-Coroner. Approved appropriation adjustments for Sheriff and 6ounty Library; and internal adjustments not affecting totals for Public Works. Authorized placement of Court Beard at Work Training Program, Inc., Santa Barbara. Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, to execute fee-for-service contract with physician for Medical Services. Authorized use of Concord Probation Office by U.S.C. Graduate School for classes, Feb. through May. Authorized County Counsel to stipulate to settlement of Contra Costa County v. Orland Davis, et al., Superior Court No. 137782. Authorized Medical Services to provide meals to Central County !deals on Wheels Program. Accepted 1976 Head Start Grant No. H-0375 from U. S. Dept. of health, Education and Welfare. Declared two Animal Control truck bodies as surplus and directed they be sold to the County of Sonoma for $700 each. Denied claims for damages filed by A. Clements, et al, C. Shaffer, Federal Insurance Co.; and application for leave to file late claim of H. Peck. Authorized compensation for damage to personal property of D. Flory, Medical- Mental Health .Services. Endorsed position paper of County Supervisors Association of California on compulsory binding arbitration and affirmed sane as position of this Board. Authorized Auditor to issue warrant to Jessie's Detail Service in full payment of claims resulting from an accident. Adopted Ordinance No. 76-20 amending Section 36-6.603 of the Ordinance Code to provide vacation reimbursement for management employees subject to certain conditions. Authorized legal defense for J. Folkard, forcer Deputy District Attorney, in connection with Superior Court Action No. 157450. Acknowledged receipt of letter from Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board recommending appointment of representative knowledgeable in the field of substance to serve on the governing body of proposed Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. Waived reading and fixed Feb. 10 for adoption of following ordinances rezoning land in the areas indicated: 76-16, San Ramon (1914-RZ); 76-17, Alamo (1968-RZ) ; and 76-18, Orinda (1972-RZ). Adopted following ordinances rezoning land in areas indicated: 76-1, Martinez (1948-RZ) ; 76-2, E1 Sobrante (2961-RZ); 76-3, Antioch (1963-RZ); 76-4, San Ramon (1964-RZ); and 76-5, Mt. Diablo (1951-RZ). Waived reading and fixed Feb. 10 for adoption of ordinance amending Section 32-2.622 of the Ordinance Code to add an exempt clerk position to other positons in CSA R-6 already exempted from civil service. owl-'-o -- 'February 3, 1976 Summary, continued Page 2 Approved Traffic Resolution No. 2181. Allocated additional City-County Thoroughfare Priority B Funds to'City of Martinez for construction of portion of Alhambra Avenue. Accepted Grant Deed from 0. Willis, et al, required as condition of approval " of LOP 312-72, Martinez area. Accepted Relinquishments of Abutter's Rights required as condition of approval for. Sub. MS 81-75, San Rasion area, from Leadership Housing Systems, Inc., and Gordon H. Ball, Inc. Accepted Offer of Dedication for recording only from Leadership Housing Systems, Inc., required as condition of approval for Sub. MS 81-75, San Ramon area. Authorized Public Works Director to execute contracts with J. Nelson and R. Grady for inspection services in connection with building leased by Health Dept., Concord area. Granted Navajo Aviation, Inc., extension of time to pay percentage rental due, Buchanan Field. Requested Tax Collector to submit report to Government Operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and L+nsche!d) on complaint of K. Reynolds with respect to penalty for delinquent property taxes. Accepted .as complete construction of sidewalks in MS 33-73, Crockett area, and authorized Public Works Director to refund deposit in connection therewith. Denied claim of R. Poe for services provided for P. Beesley. Authorized Chairman to execute following: Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with City of Martinez for reconstruction of Waterfront Road Overcrossing; Termination of Reimbursement Agreement taken to guarantee repayment of cost of services rendered to D. ?lino; Amendment Agreement with aartinez Bus Lines, Inc., to continue workshop trans- portation services for mentally retarded adults; Contracts with J. ?urby and J. Lefevre for professional speech therapy and language development services for developmentally disabled children at George Miller, Jr. , Memorial Centers, East and Kest; Agreement with City of Antioch and State for sale of certain property which has been sold to the State for non-payment of taxes; Agreement with Foraga School District and State for sale of certain property which has been sold to the State for non-payment of taxes; Contr.-ct with Criniral Justice Research Foundation for evaluation of Drug Abuse Prevention and Treatment Program; Contract with Creative Communications and Research for evaluation of Pittsburg/ Antioch Diversion Project; Contracts with J. David, Ph.D. , for staff training 1n Crisis Intervention and Pittsburg/Antioch Diversion Project;- Contract with A. Thede for Probation counseling and tutorial services; Agreement for installation and completion of private improvements in MS 102-72, Pleasant Hill area. Accepted check issued by Federal Government to pay judgment entered against it in case of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Yater Conservation District v. United States. Awarded contract to F. D. Barron Co. for certain reconstruction, Kittery Avenue, San Ramon area. Acknowledged receipt of communications from various city councils advising of their positions on the draft of the Contra Costa County Solid 'haste Management Plan. 2. }......... .. r-: _ wa a February 3, 1976 Summary, continued Page 3, Referred to: Public Works Director (Environmental Control) report of Hay Area Sewage Services Agency with respect to water quality management; Government Operations Committee the proposed County Sheriff-Coroner's Safe Driving Award Program; County Counsel request of Kensington Community Service District for information as to legality of employment of recreational instructors; and request of cast County Resource Center that J. Quinn be appointed to the hoard of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County; Director, Human Resources Agency, request of Rubicon, Inc., for assistance in obtaining funding for its Fental health Care Program; Mt. Diablo P'arshal's Office, Auditor and County Counsel request of M. Nunes for services as a temporary Deputy Marshal; County Administrator request of Diablo Bowmen for an answer with respect to an application for grant of open-space easement, Mt. Diablo area; Clerk-Recorder, County Counsel and County Administrator letter from Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors urging this county to challenge the validity of the Federal Voting Rights Act; County Administrator and Public Works Director request of CSAC Transportation Policy Advisory Committee that the Board indicate its position on proposed revisions of certain Government Code sections related to requirements for formal competitive bidding on public works projects; Public Works Director letter from H. York, Administrative Aide to Assemblyman D. Boatwright, With respect to traffic conditions at the entrance of Walt Disney Elementary School, Pine Valley Road, San Aaron area; and letters from residents with respect to traffic conditions in the vicinity of ilia Hermosa, Orinda area. Approved recommendations of Supervisor Linscheid with respect to procedures pertaining to installation of underground CATV systems in new developments; acknowledged report of Special Committee (Supervisors Kenny and Linscheid); and fixed Feb. 10 for Board decision. Requested Government Operations Committee to meet with representatives of the Contra Costa County Dater District and the East Say Kunicipal Utility District to discuss the threat of salinity intrusion on the quality of water in the County and the possibility of negotiating an exchange of water. Granted appeal of A. Schwartz from Condition No. I of the conditions imposed by the Hoard of Appeals in connection with LUP 2047-75, Clayton area; denied appeal from Condition No. 8 as to truck limitation; and approved LUP 2047-75 subject to certain conditions. Waived reading and fixed Feb. 10 for adoption of Ordinance Pio. 76-21 amending Section 32-2.646 of the Ordinance Code to exempt from Civil Service System position* of Chief Assistant County Administrator and Assistant County Administrator (Finance). Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 76/91, authorizing changes in the assessment roll; 76/92 and 76/93, authorizing cancellation of delinquent penalties on first Installment on 1975-76 secured assessment roll; 76/94, authorizing cancellation of tax liens'on property•acquired by public agencies; 76/95, authorizing cancellation of tax liens on and transfer to unsecured roll of property acquired by public agencies; 76/96, authorizing correction to 1975-76 tax roll reflecting correction of certain assessments, Pleasant Hill area; 76/97, approving subdivision agreement for public improvements in Sub. MS 137-74, Martinez area; 76/98, approving road acceptance agreement for Silver Cloud Place, Sub. 4336, Danville area; 76/99, approving cap and subdivision agreement for Sub. 4686, Alamo area; 76/100, approving rsap and subdivision airreerent for Sub. 4685, Alamo area; 76/101, authorizing payment to Lane Children's Center for pre-placement visits; 76/102, urging passage of HR 8911, a bill to Improve federal administration of SSI/SSP; 76/103, authorizing Public Works Director to request an allocation from State Grade Separation Fund for reconstruction of [Waterfront Road (Peyton) Overcrossing, Martinez area; � 1 2 �I r t 4 f February 3,. 1976 Sunwary, continued Page 4 76/104, directing advertisement for construction bids for installation of median landscaping in Assessment District No. 1973-3, San Ramon area; 76/105, approving abandonment of Ivanhoe Avenue at its intersection with Highland Avenue, Lafayette area; 76/206, approving abandonment of portion of Rustic Slay, Orinda-Rheem area; 76/107, approving abandonment of Alley D off Pacheco Boulevard, Pacheco area; 76/108, fixing Parch 2 at 11 a.m. for hearing on proposed change of name of portions of 2nd Street and 11th Street to Prospect Avenue, Port Costa area; 76/109, fixing March 2 at 11:05 a.n. for hearing on proposed change of name of portion of Barry dill Road to Barry Hill Court, !Martinez area; 76/110, agreeing to offer for sale surplus property within Assessment District 1973-4, Danville Off-Street Parking. Acknowledged rece±pt of Environmental Evaluation of draft P-.i;lication for Community Development Block Grants and authorized Chairman to execute letters to the Association of ,Bay' Area Governments and the State transmitting copies of said draft application for their review. Denied appeal of Danville Baptist Church from Condition No. 14 imposed by the Board'of Adjustment in connection with approval of LLP 2081-75, San Ramon area. Requeste:i County A ^;nstrator to investigate necessary procedures to redesign jail in accordance with certain alternatives as stated In his Dec. 22 report. Authorized Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services .Agreement with Nat±onal Air Balancing Company of San Francisco, Inc., for balancing of heating and air conditioning system for the County Courthouse. Authorized Public Works Director to execute an agreement with Daniel, Mann, Johnson & Mendenhall to conduct a Master Plan Study for the development of Buchanan Field Airport. As ex officio the Hoard of Directors of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 15, acknowledged receipt of report of Public Works Director on status of Clean Mater Grant Application. Recessed into Executive Session at 9:45 a.m. to obtain legal counsel on matter involving potential litigation. 00453 f iY i i, Ch,�� `.;f 1� �.'x s fir. � • - b r Ft k 4 k t � I r: Y J F�6 Yg N' �M�w Pr►iw{iilig dCCt1QE@nt8 rt r F J � .consist oP 453 Pages ?y a x� t r ac rr T x Y S f f s r t x . t :1 r; s Y ; $ KJ� y , a; s. r�> is � fk _ ,.,�n.:41.. x ♦ ,..,.:.:...:, +.".a::.n .q°�'A6fR41N"SRms".rnmsx'ymv:.�T10nMv�tCatwRd�4i�e. ._ .... .. .. .: ,. •.- � �0�.._.�..Te.