The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 01211975 - R 75A IN 3 • • 1975 JANUARY TUESDAY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION at 9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, JANUARY 21, 1975 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman.W. N. Boggess, Presiding; Supervisors J. P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Adm histrator and Public Works Director. r OWN •JAMES P. KENNY,RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.OCAS,SA"rwBlO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY � p �Y 2ND DIS TRICT Y1C[C1IAIAMAM JAMES E. MORIARTY. LAFAY[TTE JAMES R.OLSSON•couNTY CLERK JRD DISTRICT AND FOR AND ER OF/ICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N. BOGGESS.CONCORD SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL ATH DISTRICT CHIEF CLEAT( FDMUND'7t•L•i:ACHEI^., PITTSBURG BOARQCHAMBERS. ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING tnlOrcc:ze•aa» IIT"DISTRICT 217[MSION 2371 P.O. BOX 91t MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY JANUARY .21 , 1975 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:10 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:30 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted •to the Board. " 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Bodrd_ members-,. 9:45 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees. 9:45 A.M. Service pin awards. 10:00 A.M. - Executive Session (Government Code Section 54957) . 10:00 A.M. Recess. 10:40 A.M. Hearing on proposed abatement of property located at 2434 Birch Street, Martinez area, Title• Insurance & Trust Company et al, owners; continued from September 30, 1974. 11 :00 A.M. Receive quotations for providing account collection services to the county for the 1975 and 1976 calendar years. 11 :00 A.M. Receive bids for sale of bonds for Assessment District No. 1973-3 (Bishop Ranch) , San Ramon area; and adopt resolution authorizing sale of said bonds.. 11 :00 A.M. Contra Costa County Solid ;taste Management Policy - Committee will present a summary of its activities and request authorization to negotiate a contract for the preparation of the. required Countywide Solid Waste Management Plan. 11 :10* A.M. Hearing on Planning Commission request (1940-RZ) to rezone land in-the Alamo area from General Agricultural District (F-2) to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20) . Approval is recommended. 11 :15 A.M. Hearing on Planning Commission recommendation with reSDect to request of Mr. Ruben Ortiz (1728-RZ) to rezone lane in the Brentwood area from Single Family Residential District-15 (R-15) to Light Industrial District (L-I) and for site plan approval ,(L.U.P. No. 75-73) to expand an existing auto wrecking yard; continued from January 22, 1974. Director of Planning recommends that the request of Mr. Ortiz for a six- month postponement of said hearing be approved. 101 'J ' OM Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued January 21 , 1975 11 :15 A.M. Department of California Highway Patrol will present its Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program. 2:00 F.M. Hearing on application of Industrial Tank, Inc. (L.U.P. 377-73) to establish a Class I Disposal Site, Brentwood area. The Board on January 14, 1975 declared its intention to continue the hearing to Monday, February 24, 1975 at 8:00 p.m. 'ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 7: CONSENT 1. FIX compensation for election officers and rental of polling places for elections to be held during the 1975 calendar year. 2. FIX February 11 , 1975 at 11 :05 a.m, as time for hearing on proposed amendment to the County Ordinance Code pertaining to regulations for public lands. 3. FIX February 11 , 1975 at 11 :10 a.m. as time for hearing on proposed amendment to the Recreation Element of the County General Plan. 4. AUTHORIZE extension of time in which to file final map of Subdivision 4542, Martinez area. 5. AUTHORIZE execution of agreement for construction of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 100-74, Alamo area. 6. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll and cancellation of uncollected penalty and interest on assessment reduced by Assessment Appeals Board/Officer. 7. DENY claim of Rosemary de la Torre in the amount of $1 ,000,000 for personal injuries. Items 8 - 19: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) . 8. CONSIDER action to be taken with respect to refund of election filing fees in view of January 8, 1975 memorandum from County Counsel. 9. MEMORANDUI4 from Director of Planning transmitting Planning Commission resolution (adopted after two public hearings) recommending that the request of the San Ramon Valley General Plan Committee for interim growth controls not be granted; the Director of Planning advises that the Board is not required to hold hearings on the matter but' may accept and adopt the Commission' s recommendation as conclusive. ACKL1011LEDGE RECEIPT AND APPROVE RECOINIKENDATION OF PLANNING C0-2-IISSION 10. M I-ORANDUr. report from Acting Director of Personnel with respect to the potential layoff of six San Pablo Fire Protection District employees temporarily employed by the City of Richmond, recommending that the Board adopt a policy statement which would offer said firefighters the opportunity of transferring to the new River Fire Protection District effective July 1 , 1975 and to Contra Costa County Fire Protection District in the interim. APPROVE AS RECONMENDED OR REFER TO GOVERINIM -1T OPERATIONS COVRIITTEE FOR REVIEW 0 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued January 21 , 1975 11 . I.1E140RA1,vDU;•1 from -Chairman, Emergency Medical Care Committee, (in response to Board referral) submitting recommenda- tions on the Contra Costa County Ambulance Association proposal pertaining to ambulance regulations, rates. and services. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND REFER TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR FOR REVIE'w 12. LETTER from Social Service Unit 1G1 , Pleasant Hill, urging Board to approve for county employees State disability benefits indicated to be available under pending legis- lation. REFER. TO EMPLOYEE RELATIONS OFFICER 13. LETTER from General Manager, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, Berkeley, advising that it intends to terminate its ' agreement for distribution of food stamps and requesting that Board waive the full 60-day notice requirement and approve termination of said agreement effective February 28, 1975. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR RECOMMENDATION 14. LETTER from Senator J. A. Nejedly, Chairman of the State Senate Committee on P•aatural Resources and Wildlife, advising that he is considering introducing legislation which would result in preparation of a comprehensive conservation and develop- ment plan to guide uses of the resources of the Sacramento- San.Joaquin Delta, and requesting Board suggestions in connection therewith. REFER TO COUNTY ADT-IINISTRATOR FOR REVIEW IN CONJITNCTION WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF TIM DELTA ADVISORY PLANNING COUNCIL 15: LETTER from Executive Secretary, Contra Costa County Mayors' Conference in response to Board referral pertaining to the posting of gasoline prices, advising that members of the Conference are equally divided on the question and that therefore it does not intend to proceed further in the matter. ACIU,IO;'LEDGE RECEIPT 16. LETTER from President, League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley, concurring with goals and objectives cited by Board Chairman for the 1975 calendar year, enclosing copy of a publication stating League position on current state and national issues, and offering its services with respect to citizen.participa- tion and understanding of government• and its processes and procedures. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT 17. LETTERS from Field Representative, Social Services Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO, urging that the Board support State Legislative measures SB 28 and AB 244• and Congressional measure S 4119, which it indicates would relieve financial problems and funding of social services. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR REVIE1,1 18. LETTER from Ms. Beverly L. Hall, 1�Ialnut• Creek-, complaining about animal control policies with respect to lost or stolen animals (horses) and offering suggestions in connec- tion therewith. REFER TO AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER FOR REVIEW 19. LETTER from Mrs. I.iilliam Rogan, Antioch, complaining about the welfare system and expressing the opinion that eligi- bility _criteria and welfare allowances are too restrictive. ACKh'01.LEDGE RECEIPT AND REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY 00004 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued January 21 , 1975 Items 20 - 22: INFORMATION- (Copies of communications listed as information items ' have been furnished to all interested parties. ) 20. LETTER from Mr. T. J. Nelson, El Cajon Ranch, Lafayette, trans- mitting a copy of an article entitled "In Support of the Williamson Act" (an act to preserve agricultural lands) . 21 . LETTER from Director, State Department of Parks and Recreation, transmitting a copy of "Procedural Guide for the Grant Program under the State Beach, Park, Recreational and His- torical Facilities Bond Act of' 1974" to assist in the appli- cation for funds available under said Act and to aid in the administration of an approved project. 22. LETTER from State Franchise Tax Board advising that after a finding of violation by local regulatory -agencies followed by notification of nor_compliwice to the Franchise Tax Board, certain state income tax deductions are disallowed (Chanter 238, Statutes 1974) to landlords who maintain "substandard rental housing. " Persons addressing the Board should complete the form provided on the rostrum and furnish the Clerk with a written cow of their presentation. DEADUNE FOR AGE24DA ITFI-IS: j.'EDNESDAY, 5. P.M. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building PSartinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions, January 21, 1975 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Health Department. Add one (1) Assistant Sanitarian, Salary Level 285 ($879-$1,068) , and cancel one (1) Sanitarian, position number 01, Salary Level 333 ($1,017-$1,236) , effective January 22, 1975. 2. Public Works. Allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Apprentice Mechanic, Salary Level 275t ($940-$1,036) , effective January 22, 1975. 3. Probation Depart-tent. Add one (1) Community P_ide and cancel one (1) Departmental Services Aide, position number 01, both at Salary Level 151 ($584-$710) , effective January 22, 1975. 4. Sheriff-Coroner. Add one (1) Deputy Sheriff- Female and cancel one (1) Deputy Sheriff, position number 30, both at Salary Level 352 ($1,078-$1,310) , effective January 22, 1975. 5. Sheriff-Coroner. Cancel one (1) Deputy Sheriff, position number 145, Salary Level 352 ($1,078- $1,310) , effective January 22, 1975. 6. Sheriff-Coroner. Reclassifv one (1) Administrative Services Assisiant II, position number 01, Salary Level 366 ($1,125-$1,367) , to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 430 ($1,367- $1,662) , effective January 22, 1975. 7. San Pablo Fire Protection District. Reclassify one (1) Senior Firefighter, position number 01, Salary Level 342 ($1,045-$1,271) , to Fire Inspector, Salary Level 382 ($1,181-$1,436) , effective January 22, 1975. 8. Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court. Add one (1) Deputy Clerk IV, Salary Level 309 ($945-$1,149) , e=-=ective January 22, 1975. 9. jest Municipal Court. Reclassify one (1) De puny Clerk ii , position n urbe= 02, Salary Level 179 ($636-$-173) , to Deputy Clerk �II, Salary Level 243 ($773-$440) , effective January 22, 1975. VV� A < To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 1/21/75 Page 2. II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS 10. Authorize attendance of William A. Garrison, Materials Testing Engineer, and Gerald Evans, Assistant Materials Testing Engineer, Public Works Department, at the Ninth Annual Nevada Street and Highway Conference in Reno, Nevada in the period from March 12, 1975 through March 14, 1975. 11. Authorize attendance of Robert J. Dornan, Business Services Assistant, and Al Barba, Equipment Mechanic, Public Works Department, at the 24th Annual Motor Vehicle Maintenance Conference in Seattle, Washington in the period from March 23, 1975 through March 27, 1975. III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 12. County Medical Services. Add $196,602 for Mlental Health Continuing Care Services, Alcohol Program Mlanagement, and development of a mental health information system. These appropriations are offset by $182,658 in appropriable revenue for a net county cost of $13,944. 13 . Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following accounts: Public Works, Probation, County Counsel and Social Service. IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 14. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to initiate legal action in Small Claims Court against Larry R. Smith to recover the sum of $118.07 cue the County. 15. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Satisfaction of Lien taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to John Henry and Louise A. Wilks , who have made repavment in full. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACFML_%TS/RATES 16. Authorize payment of a special board and care rate of $475 per month, effective January 22, 1975 to Mars. Nanette Gerstle, 9 Roosevelt Circle, Palo Alto, Cal-ifornia for the care of a dependent child of: the court, presently placed at the Fred Finch Youth Center at $1,645 per nJnth, as by the Di rector, Aumnan Resources Agency. To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re : Recommended Actions 1/21/75 Page 3. V. BOARD AND CARE PLACEMENTS/RATES 17. Approve rate adjustment for following additional f institutions for which rate adjustment is required effective January 1, 1975: (1) Community of Concern, from $250 to $461. (2) Clearwater Ranch (private institution) , from $1,063 to $1,124. (3) Clearwater Ranch (group home) , from $953 to $1,014 . (4) New morning Home for Girls, from $800 to $865. VI. CONTRACTS AND GFUVNTS 18. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreement between the County of Contra Costa and Phoenix Programs, Inc. for the provision of mental health services (residential rehabilitation services) during the period from January 1, 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a cost not to exceed $37,000, as recommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency. Funding provided at a ratio of 90$ State and 10€ local match under the augmented appropriation for Continuing Care authorized in AB 4513 (1973-1974 session) . 19. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, _ to execute purchase of service agreements for CETA Title I on-the-job training projects with (1) United Truck Driving School of Northern California ($12,500) , and (2) Olsen Electro- ' Surgical Instruments, Inc. ($1,200) , as recorrr,ended by the County Manpower Advisory Council and the Director, Human Resources Agency. 20. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to submit revised application. to State Office on Aging for the Nutrition Project for the Elderly in the amount of $153,768, the same as for the previous grant period. 21. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Office of Economic Opportunity Statement of OEO Grant accepting funds for the operation of the Co_--munity Action Program for the first auarter of the 1975 program year in the amount of $298 ,125 ($238,500 federal share and $59,625 local share) . V--- !. REc�, ESTATE yCTIC .S 22. Authoriz-e Chairman_, Board of Supervisors, to execute a_men(I ent to lease between the County of Contra Costa and Apollo Enterprises for reimbursement of leasehold improvements in the amount of $353 .00 installed at 3700 Delta Fair Blvd. , Antioch (pre-Ases occupied by the Health Department) . To: Board of Supervisors From: Countv Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 1/21/75 Page 4. VII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 23. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute renewal lease between the County of Contra Costa and Contra Costa Water District for premises at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord, for office of Supervisor District IV. 24. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute one vear lease between the County of Contra Costa and A. F. Bray, Jr. et al, for premises at 739 Ward Street, Martinez for use by a portion (Conservatorship Unit) of the Office of the County Counsel. 25. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute two year lease between the County of Contra Costa and V. J. Bennett for continued use of two boat berths for use by the Sheriff's Marine Patrol. 26. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Memorandum of Lease for recording of lease dated September 24, 1974 between the County of Contra Costa and Brentwood Health Center Com-nittee, Inc. for premises at 110 Oak Street, Brentwood, used as a Health Clinic. VIII. OTHER ACTIONS 27. Authorize submittal of three entries (Multi- Agency Focus on the Preschool Child, Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program, and Blind Adolescent Life Skills Center) in the NP_CO 1974-1975 New County Achievement Awards Program. 28. Designate the Human Resources Agency as the public entity in the County with which the State Office on Aging shall work in the development of an Ax-ea Agency on Aging within Contra Costa County. 29. As recommended by the Emergency Telephone Systems Committee (9-1-1) , approve Countywide 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System Plan pursuant to Government Code Sections 53100 through 53120 , and authorize Clerk, Board of Supervisors, to file copies of said plan with Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and the State of California, General Services Department (Communications Division) . NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with considera- tion of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: THURSDAY, 5 :00 P.M. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA January 21, 1975 EXTRABU .S -INESS . REPORT Report A. INLET GRATE MODIFICATION - AWARD CONTRACT - Countvwide Area The Board of Supervisors, through its Order dated January 14, 1975, referred to the Public Works Director the following bids received for the Inlet Grate Modification Project: Chas. I. Cunningham, Oakdale. . . 91959.25 George Bianchi Construction Company, San Jose. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,245.90 Metal Specialties Company, . Leandro . . . . . . 10,642.80 Jack Parker, Incline Village. . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . 22,050.00 Albay Construction Company, Martinez. . . . . . . . 24,255.00 Eugene G. Awes Construction, Pittsburg. . . . . 29,106.00 Von Raesfeld Engineering Construction, Petaluma . . . . . . . . . . . 32,340.00 McGuire and HesterOakland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50,715.00 Engineer' s Estimate. . . . . .-,.$11,025.00 It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the - contract to Chas. I. Cunningham Company of Oakdale. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: - Contract bonds are not required for contract bid amount of less than $10,000.) (RE: Work Order 4944) (RD) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page 1 of 1 January 21, 1975 00010 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California January 21, 1975 AGENDA REPORTS Report A. NORTH RICHMOND BYPASS - STATUS REPORT - North Richmond Area The Board of Supervisors, through its Order of January 14, 1975, requested -a report on .the status -of the North Richmond_ Bypass project. -The prdposed North'Richmond 'Bypass' project •consists of a _ new four-lane divided highway extending fro& -thp.Rictfm6nd City Limits at Gertrude Avenue northerly- t6 Parr Boulevard; - and then along Parr Boulevard to Goodrick Avenue. The new road will continue southerly of Gertrude Avenue to Castro Street in the Cit;* of Richmond as a City project. _ It is .understood that. the City intends to proceed with construction of -their portion of the .project .between Castro Street and Gertrude Avenue in 1975 or 1976 using, in part, $250,000 in County Aid-To-Cities funds ($112,000 presently allocated, $138,000 proposed for the Fiscal Year 75-76 budget) . The estimated cost of the project based 'on current prices is $2,000,000, excluding rights of way ($1,600,000 for the ortion beta.*een Gertrude Avenue and Parr Boulevard and 400,000 for the portion along Parr Boulevard) . Right of way, acquisition by the County began in Fiscal Year 1971-72. All but one parcel needed for the portion of the project - •bett:een Gertrude avenue and Parr Boulevard has been acquired. it is anticipated -tiat the rights of way for the portion along Parr Boulevard will be provided through dedications of rights of way by adjoining developments. The project is included in the County's Afajor Projects Program which was approved by the Board of Supervisors in Au-ust 1974. The tentative date for funding of the Countyis portion of the project per the ilajor Projects Program is Fiscal Year 77-78 and Fiscal Year 78-79. This wId probably indicate construction beginning in 1978 or 1979. Should other funds become available for this construction, such as Cos unity Development Funds, it may be possible to advertise the project at an earlier date. (RE: Project No. 0572-4345-72) (RD) . AGENDA - Public Works Department Page -1 of 10 January 21, 1975 Q AT Report B. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMITTEE/ CONCORD COMMUNITY FORMA REPRESENTATIVE . By Board Order of December 17, 1974, the Public Works Director was requested to report on the advisability to enlarge the Transportation Advisory Committee to accommodate representation from the Concord Forum and other agencies that may wish representation. The Transportation Advisory Committee is composed of representatives from -various community groups. Originally, the membership was composed primarily of city delegates an:' Chamber of Commerce representatives. As the County grc--. , additional representation by a variety of community ' orr, -,:;nations has been requested. The most recent app::;ntment approved by the Board of Supervisors was the League:.of Women Voters. - The Concord. Co=- nity Foium has been actively interested - Irk the irans06`tation probleims 'of the City of Concord .. and, because of this, their representation on. the- . . Contra Costa County Transportation Advisory Committee is meritorious. It is recemamended that the Board of Supervisors approve the request of the Concord Community Forum for representation on the Transportetiom.Advisory Co:zmittee. (TP)- Report Tp)Report C. MARSH CREVK ROAD BOX CULVERT - CONTRACTOR'S CLAIM - Clayton Area The Board of SuDervisors, on October 8, 1974, having been informed by the Public Works Director that his Department had received a letter from Filipovich Construction Company, contractor on the Marsh Creek Road Box Culvert project, setting forth reasons why a contract time extension should be granted and the amount of liquidated damages be modified, ordered the Public Works Director to analyze said letter and report the findings and recommendations to the Board. Under Item 9 of the Public Works Agenda of October 8, 1974., . it was reported that the contractor would be assessed liquidated damages for 85 calendar days' delay in completing the project. (continued -on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page of 10 - January 21, .1975 Won. . Report C continued: An extensive review and analysis of inspectors' reports and diaries, construction records, and of the contents of the Filipovich Construction Company's letter of September 30, 1974, has been completed. It is found that a 22 working-day extension of time can be made under the provisions of Section 8-1.07 of the Standard Specifications. The overrun of contract time will thus become 52 calendar days, resulting in liquidated damages of -$3,900 ($75 per calendar day) . Section 8-1.07 of the Standard Specifications permits the Board of Supervisors to substitute actual inspection costs for liquidated damages. The inspection costs during the 52-day overrun period are approximately $3,200. ' However, such a substitution or further time extension are -the prerogative .of the Board. It is recommended .that the Board refer this matter to an appropriate Board Committee for recon m endation. - This Department will -provide the-necessary background information. (RE: - Project No. 3971-4597-73) (OP. & FCA) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. VERDE AVEN44JE - DEFERRED U:PROVENFNT AGREEMENT - North Richmond rea It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Deierred Improvement Agreement. for Land Use Permit 198-71 and authorize its Chairman to execute it on behalf of the County. Owner: Boyd P. Wilson, 206 Linda Vista Avenue, Pittsburg, CA Location: LUP 198-71 is located on Verde Avenue between Fourth S trent and Fifth Street (RE: Road No. 05651•1 - Assessor' s Map Book No. 409-267-02 & 03) (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 2: CENTER AVENUE - DEFERRED I'LPR0VE?1E1,7 AGREEMENT - Pacheco Area' It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Deferred Improvement Agreement for Minor Subdivision 1-74 and authorize its Chairman to execute it on behalf of the County. Owne_: Empire Residential Investors, 1825 Willow Pass Road, Suite 207, Concord, CA 94520 Location: Minor Subdivision 1-74 is located on the north side of Center Avenue near the intersection of Flame Drive. (RE': Road No. 3471 - Assessor's Parcel No. 125-120-02) (LD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page _� of 10 January 21, 1975 00013+ d Item 3. SUBDIVISION 4234 - ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENT - Pleasant Hill Area _ Jim Orosco Construction Company, Subdivider, requested the abaridonuient -of a portion of the drainage easement . through Lots 6 and 7 of Subdivision 4234. The abandonment is necessitated by the accidental encroachment of buildings into the drainage easement. _ It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors set a date for a public hearing on the proposed abandonment. (10:30 a.m. , March 4, 1975 suggested) . (LD) Item 4. RODEO CREEK: CHANNEL - EXCESS LAND .SALE - Rodeo Area It is recommended. that -the Board of- Supervisors, as ex officio the Board of. Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and hater Conservation District, adopt a Resolution and Notice of- Intention to Sell-Real Property involving three parcels of excess District property. These parcels are to be sold at public auction' - on March 1, 1975 in accordance with Government Code Section 25520, et seq. . It is further recommended that the Board approve the to=s and conditions prepared by the' County Real Property Agent as set forth 'in the Notice of Intention to sell Real Proaerty and Notice to Bidders, $nd authorize the Clerk of the Board to post ..and publish the Notice: of Intent".on to Sell Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 6063. Environmental and planning considerations in this regard have been complied ;-pith. . (RE: Work Order 8788 - Zone 8-A) (RP) Item 5. A MN'D ROAD - UTILl_T•z RESERVATION a�AIfiO::*�'NT - E1 Sobrante Area Pacific Gas and Electric Company has requested, the abandonment of. the utility re,erv`tion .in the Abandonment Order of a Portion of Amend Rosd (4124 OR 0661) . Pacific Gas and Electric Company ovnt s this property and has no need of the utility _ reservation on their owm property. It is reco-.?anded that the Board of Supervisors set a date for a public hearing on the proposed utility reservation abandonment. (10:30 a.m. on March 4, 1975 is suggested) • (LD) Item. 6. IRTVESTiE-:t\7 STREET DRAIN - ENGIt LER'S REPORT - Rodeo Area The Advisory Board for Rodeo Creek Flood Control Zones 8 and 8A has requested that the Investment Street Storm Drain project become a scppl:mert to the zone plan. This storm drain would provide improved drainage facilities in downtown Rodeo. (continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page . of 10 January 21, 1975 OM4. Item 6 continued: It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as the - governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorize the District staff to prepare an Engineer's report for this project . Resolution required. (RE: Work Order 8170) (FCP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 7. COUNTY' SERVICE AREA R-8 - PARKS AND OPEN- SPACE PROGRAM - Walnut Creek Area - Itis recommended that the Board •-of Supervisors, in accordance with provisions of the agreement dated September 17, 1974, between. the City of .V7alnut Creek ands the Couaty, approve the City' s proposal to proceed with negotiations for its purchase of the Cortese Land Company property. This property contains approximately 137 acres. The City' s cost is to be financed from the proceeds of the sale of the $6 ,750,000.00 1974 Park and Open Space Bonds previously authorized by this Board for County Service Area R-8 (CSA) Item t. CANYON ?:L^-_D - Cv TERACT ACCEPT.I\'CE - 110raga The contract for the Canyon Road Wideniiig project from San Leandro Creek to Coantry Club Drive, in Moraga, was completed by the Contractor, O.C. Jones and Sons- of. Berkela--, on Decea:ber. 24, 1974, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $302,500. It.- is .recommended -that the Board of .Supervisors accept the contract as cemhlete as of December 24, 1974. The contract was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project NG. 2631-4165-74) (C) Item 9. NORTHGATE ROAD - PU]LIC NOTICE- Walnut Creek Area It is recorended ,that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the publication of a Notice of Opportunity for a Public Hearin- on the proposed North-ate Road Reconstruction project. The project consists of replacing the existing- narrow bridge- over Pine Creek near Oak Grove Road on an improved alignment. The Public Works Department has been advised by the State Department of Transportation that this project qualifies for Federal funding under the 1973 Federal Highway Safety • Ac.t, Section 230, Safer Roads Demonstration Program, which provides Federal. participation. (continued ori next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page of 10 January 21, 1975 00015 Item 9 continued: The publication of the Notice of Opportunity for a Public Hearing is a requirement of the State Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration for Federal-Aid projects. (RE: Project No. 4461-4561-72) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 10. SUBDIVISION 4233 - DEPOSIT REFUND - Pleasant Hill Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after accepcahce of the streets for maintenance has been .successfully completed. - it is therefore reco=ended that- the Board of .Supervisdrs: 1: De^lare that the street and drainage- improvements have -' successfully completed. the one-year satisfactory performance period and that all deficiencies developing ng this period have been corrected. 2. Ati 'horize the Public t?orfs Director to refund to 2 .-gan Development; Inc. , 2540 North Main Street, V;alnut Creel:, CA 94595 , the $500.00 cash deposit as su::cty under the Subdivision Agreement, as evidenced- by the Deposit Permit Detail No. 99219 dated May 12, 1972. Streats were accepted for maintenance on October. 29, 1973. Subdivider: Morgan Development, Inc. , 2540 North Main Street, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Locatio-_n: Subcivision 4233 is located north of Diablo View Rood, approximately 600 feet west of Pleasant Hill Road. (LD) Item 11. OAK rGA� EXTE?:SION - LAS JUNITAS .TO COGGINS LANE - ENVIROIZTNTAL IIT A!"'T REPORT - .Pleasant Hill Area In co:ipliance with the requirements of the California Enviro=ental Quality Act of 1970, a-Draft Environmental Impact Report for the extension of Oak Road, from Las Juntas to Coggins Lane, was submitted to the Planning Department on Novembar 11, 1974. On December 17 , 1974, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Environmental Impact Report. 'The Planning Co=ission found the project to be in conformance with the County General Plan, as per Section 65402 of the Goverrtnent Code, and that the Eaviron�,.enLai lmpact Report was adequate. The final Environmental Impact'Report is hereby filed with the Board of Supervisors for consideration. (RE: Project No. 4052-4143-74) (RD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page of 10 January 21, 1975 OMT Item 12. OAK ROAD EXTENSION - CALTRA_NS PLAN REVISION - Pleasant Hill Area Itis recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve Work Order 4143 ' and and -authorize the Public Works Director ' to arrange for the California Department of _Transportatioci to review the plans and specifications for the proposed- . -Oak Road Extension project at an estimated cost of $3,000. State review of the plans and specifications is required because the project is being funded under. the Federal-Aid Urban Program. (RE: . Project No. 4052-4143-74) (RD) Item 13. STATE HIGHWAY 4 - NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD - DEED -AGCEPTANCE Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approvdi . and authorize its Chairman to sign, the Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Transportation Company, and consent.. to its acceptance and recordation after execution -and delivery by Grantor. The easement is for road and drainage purposes over a .. parcel -of railroad property .(..247 of =an acre) at- Solano Way, in- conjunction with the State North Frontage Road project,, . which will be relinquished to the County upon completion of construction. (Public Utilities Commission Crossing No. B0-40.6-X-N) . (RE: Work Order 4586) (PIP) Item 14. MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT EXTENSION - Concord Area Itis recommended that the .Board of Supervisors approve the Minor Subdivision Agreeaent Extension for Minor Subdivision 292-72 and authorize its Chairman to sign on its behalf• = . This Subdivision Agreement Extension eyrants ani extension of time to and including November 26, 1975. The Public Works Department has discussed progress of the work with the Developer and believes that there are sufficient reasons, including inclement weather and contract renegotiation problems, to recommend the time extension. (LD) A G E N D A Public Works= Department Page 7 of 10 January 21, 1975 ooa : SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 15 OAK GLEN COURT - ACCEPTANCE OF• INSTRUMENT - Alamo Area It is recommended that the Board' of Supervisors accept for recording only, an instrument entitled "Offer of Dedication" dated December 2, 1974, from William J.. Hayes, et ux. (RE: Minor Subdivision 104-70) (RP) Item 16 SUBDIVISION 4275 - ACCEPTAL.CE OF STREETS - -Alamo Area The construction of improvements in Subdivision 4275 has been satisfactorily -completed. The $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement, evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail -No. 106204 dated March 6, 1973, is to be retained for one year in accordance with Section 94-4 .406 of the Ordinance Code. It is.. recommended that the Board of Supervisors: (a) Issue an Order stating that the work is complete. (b) Accept as County Roads the following named streets which are shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4275 filed 4-12-73 in Book. 156 of Maps at page 18. Pebble Court (16/26/0.08) Pebble Drive (32/52/0.08) Boulder Drive (16/26/0.02) Road Group: 4537 Total Mileage: 0.18 mile Subdivision Agreement dated April 3, 1973 Subdivider: Falender Homes. Corp. , - 1885 Oak Park Boulevard, "Pleasant-Hill, California Location: South of Stone Valley Road, west of Gay Court . - - (LD) Item 17 .. FREITAS ROAD. - ROAD CLOSURH - Danville Area Due to inclement-weather, Freitas- Road bridge repair in Danville area was not completed as scheduled. The Public Works Director has granted a prior approval for a two-day time extension of Freitas Road road closure through January 15, 1975, in accordance with Item 3 of Board Policy on road closures. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors approve the action taken by the Public Works Director. (M) Item 18 . HILLCREST AVENUE. - RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION - Antioch Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept Grant of Easement and Right of Way Contract dated January 7, 1975 from Vernon Rouner, et al. , and authorize Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, to sign -said Contract- on behalf of the County. (Continued on next page) A_ G E id D A Public Works Department Page g of 10 January 21, 1975 00-018.. Item 18 Continued: It is further recommended that the County be authorized to draw a warrant in the amount of $100 ..00 in- favor of Vernon Rouner, and deliver same to the County Supervising. Real Property Agent for further handling. Payment is for 840 square feet of land required for• the project. - (RE: Project No. 7564-4106-73) (RP) Item 19. KAY AVENUE - MINOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEZ-TENT COMPLETION, AND APPROVAL OF DEFERRED ID PROVEhIENT AGREE.•fENT - Oakley Area The construction of improvements to Kay avenue, adjacent to Minor Subdivision 45-74 has been satisfactorily completed. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: " .1, Issue an Order stating that.. the work..,is complete. 2. Waive the bonding requirements because Kay Avenue is not a Cduhty maintained road.It is'further recormmnended that :the. Board oif,Supervisors . approve _ a Deferred Improvement Agreement for an unnairted north-south road adjacent to Minor Subdivision 45-74, - and authorize its Chairman to..execute it on behalf of 'the County. Owner: N. A. Lindsay, 17 Camelback Court, Pleasant Hill,- California 94523 Location: Minor Subdivision 45-74 is located on Kay Avenue east of O'Hara Avenue (RE: Assessor' s Parcel No. 34-070-52) GtNERPs, Item 20: JUVENILE HALL PROPERTY - DEED ACCEPTANCE Martinez Area- . It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Director's Deed from the State of Cali-fornia dated April 23 , 1974, for a small parcel of State surplus land (262 square feet) between the County's Juvenile Lull property and the relocated Glacier Drive and South Frontage Road of State Highway, Route 4 (:•Iuir Road) . (RP) Item 21. SHERIFF'S REHABILITATION CENTER - PHASE II, TERMINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL SERVICE AGREE_•iENT - Clavton Area It is reco^Tten_ed that the Board of Su:ervisors' approve the Notice of Termination dated January- 21, 1975. with respect to architectural services for the Sheriff's Rehabilitation -Center- and ehabilitation -Centerand direct the Public Works Department to (1) transmit the Notice of Termination to Dennis & Cochrane, .Inc. , Project Architect, and (2) obtain from Dennis & Cochrane the original - tracings, sketches, calculations and all other pertinent information prepared by the Architect, in accprdance with Article 8 of the original agreement. This action is requested because there has been no work on the project for several years and because the ultimate disposition of the project is uncertain. (RE: Work Order 5370) (B & G) A_ G_ E N DA_ Public Works Department Page 9_ of 10 January 21, 1975' Item 22 . CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING - ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS - Pleasant Hill is, -recommended that the Board of Supervisors„_.as.. ex officio the Governing Board of- the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District, approve the plans and specifications and the cost estimate for the con- struction of the new Consolidated Fire District Adminis- tration Building at 2010 Geary Road, Pleasant Hill, and direct its Clerk to advertise for construction bids to be received until 11:00 a.m. on February 18, 1975. The Architect's cost estimate is $425,000.'00: The-plans have been reviewed by the Board of Fire .Commissioners, the -Office of the County Administrator and the Public Works Department. The project was also reviewedby the Planning- Department _ staff of the City of Pleasant Hill and found to -be in conformance with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impact pertaining to 'this project was posted and filed *with the County Clerk on October 16, 1974. No protests have been received. It is therefore reco_ma-ended that -the Board- of Supervisors determine that this project will not have a significant effect on the .environment._ . -- _ It. is further 'recommended that the Board -bf Supervisors direct .. the Director of Planning to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. (RE: Work Order 5411) (B & G) Item 23 . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER LGENCY The Board of Supervisors to- consider attached "Calendar of Water- Meetings. ” No action required. (EC) . NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N D A_ Public Works Department Page 1.0 of 10 January 21, 1975 00M' Prepared Jointly by the Water Resources Representative and t' Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County Water Agenc January 17, 19' CALENDAR OF WATER REETINGS (Includes Meetings for which attendance has already been authorized) ATTENDANCE TIME Date of Bd. DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REnLARKS Recommended Authorizatior. Jan20 Mon. City Council of 7:30- P M_ Presentation on Port Walnut Creek City Hall Peripheral Canal Walnut Creek Jan21 Tues_ . Central Valley 10:00 A.M. Central .Valley Total, Staff Project Re- Fed. .Bldg. Water Management analysis Team Room W-1140 2800 Cottage Way Sacra.::ento Jan23 Thurs. Water Section - 12:00 _Noon llastekrater Reclamation- Staff Commont•_;cal.th Club-_ Club Office Dr_ Erman A. Person San Francisco Jan31 Fri. San Francisco Bay 9:30 A.M. Water Quality Control Staff Regional Water Edge:cater Plan for the San Quality Control Hyatt House Francisco Bay Basin Board 455 Hegenberger Road, Oakland Feb.l Sat. San Francisco Bay 9:30 A.M_ Water Quality Control Staff Regional Water Holiday Inn Plan for the San Quality Control 1800 Powell St. Francisco Bay Basin Board Emeryville 00021 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving } Personnel Adjustments. ; January 21, 1975 As recommended' by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto. and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess NOES: None. ABSENT: None. A 4 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: IFS O Department Health Budget Unit 450 Date 12-10-74 Action Requested: Cancel one (1) Sanitarian position #01 and add one (1) Assistant Sanitarian position Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide entry level vacancy for recruitment of non-flexible staffed position. COMM- os a Counly Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEIVED Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: r)_(i ;�� $ ! 828 'S 2. Fined Assets: (t izt .items curd coat) race of ounN Administrator$ 'FiL1TAAN �;,:�Ol!'.CES AGENCY Estimated total $ f 828> Signature �— ©ata_./Z I?.. Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: !*,).- ) To Civil Service: Re(ues- classification recommendat � o , Countv Administator Personnel QfYic4Eindror Civil Service Commission Date: JanuarX 14, 1975 Classification a65 Pater Recommendation Classify,l Assistant Sanitarian and cancel 1 Sanitarian. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Assistant Sanitarian. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Assistant Sanitarian, Salary Level 285 (879-1068) and the cancellation of Sanitarian, position #01, Salary Level 333 (1017-1236) . PersAnW Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: January 20, 1975 Add one (1) Assistant Sanitarian, Salary Level 285 ($879-$1,068) , and cancel ane (1) Sanitarian, position number 01, Salary Level 333 ($1,017-$1,236) , effective January 22, 1975. e_4mq=� County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors I SAN Adjustment APPROVED {�e+l� on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk n Date: JANN � 1973 By: �, a"O�� . i APPROVAL os this adju tment eonatitutea an Apphop4iati.on Adjustment and Pmonne2 Reaotuti.on Amendment. �� , POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: $ 33IY, ' Department Public Works Budget Unit 650 Date August 16, 1974 Action Requested: Establish the classification of Equipment Mechanic Aide Proposed effective date: A.S.A.P. Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide a level between Eauipment Serviceman and Dbchanic on the promotional ladder C;E3N i RA Cum i A COUNTY Estimated cost of adjustment: P, E: 0 K I V r D Amount: 1 . Sa ami e;ZanVwages: n, G ) 174 $ Unknown 2. Ft3xed Assets (t izt item6 and eoet) r,J u . L;OunLy it Estimated totaljilmown =` U) Liz � Signature > partment ea Initial Determination of County Administra or Date: -- - 7 q To Civil Service: Request classification recommendation. 4 - �-_p �2 r� unt trator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 14, 1,975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Apprentice Mechanic. On January 14, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Apprentice Mechanic and recommended Salary Level 275t (940-1036) . The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 74/581 by adding Apprentice Mechanic, Salary Level 275t (940-1036). Can be effective day following Board action. This position is not exempt from overtime. Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: January 20, 1975 Allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Apprentice Mechanic, Salary Level 275t ($940-$1,036) , effective January 22, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors JAN 2 Adjustment APPROVED ( - ) on f a 3, ULSSON F11, County Clerk Date: 2 1 197- By: a APPROVAL oS thi6 adjub#ment eonstitutea an Appnop&iati.on Adju,6tinenz and Peuonnet 0 Reao°uti.on Amendment. `�v ; t POSITIONADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: �jI7G DepartmentORATION Budget Unit 308 Date 11/14/74 Action R sted: Cancel Departmental Services Aide pos. 513-01; Add Cou mnity Aide position. Proposed effective date: 12/1/74 Explain why adjustment is needed: To utilize vacant position. o Estimated cost of adjustment: NOVFlVE Amount: OV 15 1974 co 1 . Salaries and wages:: C°ntra Costa County g Administrator 2. Fid Assets: (ti4t item cuid coat ro $ -•� Estimated tots $ Gr '/ M - Signature cr, a tment Head Initial Detami na-ti on of County Admi ni strat Date: December 1 1 To Civil• Service: 1 Request classification recommendation. ount ministrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Januarw_14` 7975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Community Aide and cancel 1 Departmental Services Aide. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Community Aide. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the ad= dition of 1 Community Aide and the cancellation of Departmental Services Aide position #Ol; both at Salary Level 151 (584-710) . Person*1 - ctor Recommendation of County Administrator ate: January 20, 1975 Add one (1) Community Aide and cancel one (1) Departmental Services Aide, position number 01, bath at Salary Level 151 ($584-$710) 1 effective January 22, 1975 . County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors .! (`i ��,� Adjustmenn& A°PROVED (" ,44 ) on J. R. OLSSON, Cpunty Clerk Date: ;, _ 1 i _ By APPROVAL ob thiz adju6tment eon6t tuteb an Appnop&i,ation Adjuatwnt and Peuon Wotuti.on Amendment. ' y POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: ?S_6�_ej Department Sheriff-Coroner -^ Bu}dg jt Yq it tk55 Date 12(6(,74 Action Requested: Cancel one Dep ty ;Ske�rktf-,o&Jf&l-n Gr-030) and add one Deputy Sheriff- Female position (#03) Proposed effective date: 1—nodiateiy Explain why adjustment is needed: This position is assigned to the Civil Bureau. In line with the County's affirmative action plan, this will create another position' for the females. tra Costo Coun Estimated cost of adjustment: ConRECEIV � Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: �D $ 2. Fixed Assets: (ti6t item and me4 DEC I 11974 effte f $ Counry Administrotor Estimated total $ Signature Departme t Head GL5NN. ADMIM . - C aKeR Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 23,-1 97L� To Civil Service: Request classification recommendation. PAr%,Ad M A 4)ql 'T _.L County Adminigtrcitor Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: ahuarg 14 197q Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Deputy Sheriff Femaleand cancel 1 Deputy Sheriff. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Deputy Sheriff Female. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/27 to reflect the addition of 1 Deputy Sheriff-Female and the cancellation of Deputy Sheriff position #30, both at Salary Level 352 (1078-1310) . Pers nil Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: January 20 , 1975 Add one (1) Deputy Sheriff-Female and cancel one (1) Deputy Sheriff, position number 30, both at Salary Level 352 ($1,078-$1,310) , effective January 22, 1975. Count]-Ad inistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors i Adjustment APPROVED ( 5ei '3) on J. R. OLSSON . puntr lerk Date: -` � �- By: APPROVAL o f #hiz adju tment eo"t tutea aft AppnopAiati,on Adf bent and PeAaomfaAW26' Reaotut.on Amendment. . � J POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Np; SCS Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 255lat !:tion Requested: Cancel Deputy Sheriff position Proposed effective date: 12/6174 255-292-121 Explain why adjustment is needed: Jack Arnett has retired effective 12/5/74- Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED $ 2. Fixed Assets: (t i,st .r teme cued coat) n F C 19 1974 uff ice ot $ County Administrator Estimated total Signature DepartmEnt Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 2 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Co5nty AdMinittrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 15, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Deputy Sheriff position. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling 1 Deputy Sheriff, position #145, Salary Level 352 (1078-1310). Can be effective day following Board action. Deputy Sheriff position x`145 was established to replace an employee in the class of Deputy Sheriff while on leave of absence. The employee has now retired and the position is no longer necessary. V Pers nnel Oirector YQW Recommendation of County Administrator Date: January 20, 1975 Cancel one (1) Deputy Sheriff, position number 145, Salary Level 352 ($1,078-$1,310) , effective January 22, 1975. County Adm nistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors .iAIN I i975 Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. OLSSON�ouety CI rk Date: By: ` . ? t ii�(� APPROVAL os taA adjustment eonzt totes an Appnop>uation AditIbnent and Pmolwq. .'V�+: Reaotuttion Amendment. POSITION ADJU--STME-.N;� OREOUEST Ne: �fc1y Department Sheriff-coroner 5;:r �r5udgei�tlni`�t 255 Date 12-9-74 ytC, DEPT• Action Requested: Reclassify Administiat. Services Assistant II positiva� (255-280-001) to the III level. Proposed effective date: 1-1-75 Explain why adjustment is needed: Incumbent has progressed to the level of Administrative Services Assistant III and is on the eligibility list for this classification. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa CountyRECEIVED Amount:-- I . Salaries and wages: 6 months @ $65/month DEC 111974 $ 390 2. Fixed Assets: (ZiAt .items and coat) nw«e n f Qwnb' AdFninistrctgr Estimated total o Signature Department Head- Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 211. 1971L To Civil Service: Request classification recommendation. County Administrator •� Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 14, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Administrative Services Assistant II to Administrative Services Assistant III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassifica- tion to Administrative Services Assistant III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the re- classification of Administrative Services Assistant II position #01, Salary Level 366 (1125-1367) to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 430 (1367-1662) . Perso nel irector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: January 20. 1975 Reclassify one (1) Administrative Services Assistant II, position number01, Salary Level 366 ($1,125-$1,367) , to Administrative Services Assistant III, Salary Level 430 ($1,367-$1,662) , . effective January 22, 1975. �U County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors JA N 2 ;y Adjustment iPPROVED on I R. OLSSON,,)County Clerk Date: ± By: APPROVAl, o6 xhia ctdjua ineart con,6tjt teb an Appnopn,i.at on ju6bnent and Peuonn .,i Reaotuaon Amendment. vU/W a_ . V P O S I T I O N A D J U S T M E N T R E Q U E S T No: Department San Pablo Fire District Budget Unit 2021 Date 11/25/74 Action Requested: Reclassify Senior Firefighter pos. #01 to Fire Inspector Proposed effective date: 12/1/74 Explain why adjustment is needed: Contra Costo County RECEIVED Estimated cost of adjustment: Office of Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: County Administrator $ 672 (7 x $96) 2. Fixed Assets: (tizt .c tem6 and co.64 $ Estimated total $ n ti a Signature J iLJ z o Department Hea Fire Chief Initial Defermi n i oq of County Administrator Date: November 27, 1971L To Civil Seervi�0e: - Request classification recommendation. County Admikistfattor Personnel Officazanc[�or Civil Service Commission Date: January 14, 1975' Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Senior Firefighter to Fire Inspector. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassifica_ tion to Fire Inspector. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Senior Firefighter position #01, Salary Level 342 (1045-1271) to Fire Inspector, Salary Level 382 (1181-1436). Personn2i D rector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: anuary 7 u, Reclassify one (1) Senior Firefighter, position number 01, Salary Level 342 ($1,045-$1,271) , to Fire Inspector, Salary Level 382 ($1,181-$1,436) , effective January 22, 1975. County Administrator Action c! the BoardSagervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( _ on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: By: Q- j KK,, APPROVAL o f t i,6 adjuAtment conzt tute6 an App&opniati.on Adjub.tment and Pen6onne 000 Re6otuaon Amendmefzt. . POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 5�q-20 Walnut Creek-Danville Department Municipal Court Budget Unit 214 Date 10-8-74 J�� ; ; n5 � � 75 Action Requested: Fill position of Deputy Clerk IV (Courtroom Clerk) Proposed effective date: 1-2-75 Explain why adjustment is needed: Legislation enacted effective 1-2-75 creates third judgeship; adjustment necessary to- provide Courtroom Clerk position for new`denartment_ Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 5,670 . 2. Fixed Assets: (Zidt -i tem6 cuzd cost) Desk ($310.00), electric typewriter ($557.00) Contra $ 867 -Osj3 cc ,,niy ._._ R E C E I V E Estimated $ 5,537 OCT 91971 Signature Depa nt ea& Clerk and Administrator Ini t' 1 e" nation of County Administrator Date: January 7, 1975 ToLliv fn+ i4rc e: Request recommendation. ount A m lstr for Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 14. 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Deputy Clerk IV. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Deputy Clerk IV. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Deputy Clerk IV, Salary Level 309 (945-1149) . Personn2L girector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: �Tanuamzgn , 197s Add one (1) Deputy Clerk IV, Salary Level 309 ($945-$1,149) , effective January 22; 1975. ` , County Administratrr } -,ction of the Boar, of Supervisors ��.• j ,` On .i .1 _ �.;r� 'J. R. OLSSON H, County Clerk Date: ci 1 i� J By: _ J APPROVAL ov thiz adju�s#ine.nt co)vst tu,tea cut Appn.opr ati.o�i Adjurttment and PejzsonneQ000 Ruotution Amendriva. A i P0SITI0M ---A' D--J-b% YMENT REOt1EST No: as- Department SDepartment WEST j;U,-aCI t, %0URT nit' '213 Date 9-17=74 Action Requested: Upgrade jibgltloV n, 095 002; Deputy Clerk II to Deputy Clerk III Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Promotion; Supervisor ! ontro osta County Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEIVED amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: DEC - 3 1974 $ 2. Fixed Assets: (tis.t item cuid coat) Office of County Admini*at0tA Estimated total aP $ Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: '/ December Sy 1974. To Civil Service: Request classification reco=endatl*-, ZIA14 Munty Rd 9trator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: January 14, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Deputy Clerk II to Deputy Clerk III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Deputy Clerk III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Deputy Clerk II position #02, Salary Level 179 (636-773) to Deputy Clerk III, Salary Level 243 (773-940). PersonrAl Wrector Recommendation of County Administrator te: January 20, 1975 Reclassify one (1) Deputy Clerk II, poisiton number 02, Salary Level 179 ($636-$773) , to Deputy Clerk III, Salary Level 243 ($773-$940) , effective January 22, 1975. County ministrator Acton of the Board of SupervisorsN .? Adjustment APPROVED ( ' onnn mt ,SA,� 1 }y j5 County Clerk Date: JAid ' ' i175 By: APPROVAL o6 tkiz ad j u6 men t eon6t uu tees an Appnopn i a t i.on Ad ju sbrent and Pelus onn IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Authorizing ) Appropriation Adjustments. January 21, 1975 On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A: Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. f , "" `7 ✓ ,D�� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies $139,442.00 01 1003 540-1012 Salaries and Fringe Benefits $ 62,442.00 . 01 1003 540-2310 Phoenix House Contract 37,000.00'- 01 1003 012-2310* Data Processing 40,000.00: 01 1003 990-9970 Appropriable Revenue 125,49&00`' Control of funds for data processinj is under Auditor-Controller's responsibility. PROOF _Comp.__ _K-P._ _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY For use in Continuing Care Services' (MDP 73-74) to " demonstrate the proper application of continuing care Date Description for mentally ill clients ($27,132 for salaries and fringe benefits. Salaries identified to the Information and Evaluation Office amount to $35,310. Both salaries and Binge benefits equal $62,442 for the. program.) APPROVED: SI WAiki RES DATE The funding requires $125,498 State share (90x) and a AUDITO - 6 County share of $13,944 (lox). Total funds of $139,442 CONTROLLER: are not part of the approved budget for FY 1974-T5• COUNTY This project is scheduled for January 1, 1975, through ADMINISTRATOR:'T, 4LWkat June 30, 19T5• BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: This will be a continuing project and will be included YES:Supervisors Kenny, Dias. ATorintty, for next year's Mental Health budget. Boggess, I.inscheid. N0% 9.ERK on.lAN 1� 1 97 _ / �el,- c.1 J_L�L_ by a. l /TS Signature Title Date �^ W. R. Downe7 II Journal Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal •See Instructions on Reverse Side CONTRA COSTA• COUNTY w APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1, DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES t RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Cade Quantit ) Fund Budget Unit Ob-ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN bb) 01 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingencies 57,160.00 01 1003 54o-1012-106i Salary and Fringe Benefits $18,360.00 01 1003 540-2100 Office Supplies 300.00 01 1003 012-2310* Data Processing 38,500.00 01 1003 990-9970 Appropriable Revenue 57,160.00 * Control of funds for data processing are under Auditor- Controller's responsibility. PROOF _Camp._ _ K.P._ _ _VER.` 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY For use in Alcoholism Contract ALC-072-74 (one time Dote Description Project) for 100% reimbursement by the Department of Health-Office of Alcohol Program Management. The contract calls for a design, devel t and ini J em nto is county manse'iSW,_and information system as provided in the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholics Prevention Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970. Agreement vas signed J. E. Moriarty, Chairman Board of APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE S pe sorS une IT, 1974. AUDITOR— 1675 CONTROLLER: The funds requested are not part of the approved budget COUNTY for CCCMS for FY 1974-75. This project is scheduled for ADMINISTRATOR: 7 January 1, 1975, through June 30, 1975. A 100% reimbursement is anticipated as appropriable revenue BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: amounting to $57,160.00. YESSuperviso.s Iical.y. L'!.* . Tiorlatty, Etor;css, LinFchr•id. NO% oJAN 21 197 tIJ r CZ •�r'�� / �S Q -� J. R. OLSSON CLERK Chief, Medi .. b hi C� G� a Administrative Services , 1/13/75 '!�'"' Signature W. R. Do uey II Title Date r prop.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) 04 urnal No. •Se�IrrstructiorTs on Reverse Side { CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PP P A RO RIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM ` Increase Fund Decrease Code 'Quantity) Bud etUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) Flood Control Zone 3-B 01 2520 2520-7700 031 1. SW Crk RW from 49300 7712 706 1. SR Crk to:.7700 4,300 2310 2. EantUrich WC Channel 1,100 3540 2, Urich E=t to 2310 1,100 Sans Crainte Drainage Facilities 0 120-?700 604 3. SAns Craint 1Z AF-1/ 5,500 7712 602 3. Sans Crainte to 6% 5s500 Flood Control Zone 8A 2531. 2531-7700 001 4. Rodeo Crk W9 000-002 39500 ` 9970 000 4. Reserve to 7700-001 29000 i 7712 002 4, Invest Dr to 7700-001 1,500 Flood Control Zone 9A 2533 2533-7700 001 5, Pinole Crk From 002 1,100 I 002 5. Pinole Crk to 001 19100 Storm Drain Maintenance District I 2560 260-7700 702 6. Pine CriE RW fro- 001 29668 001 6. Pine Crk RW to 702 29000 7712 702 6. Pine Crk fraiOdi 46s332 004 6, Pine Crk to 702 47,000 Count Sanitation District 7-A 2365 2365-2270 7. Moniter flow fro . 005 7sOV8 I 7712 005 7. Manholes to 2270 7sO78 PROOF C_omp._ _ _K_P__ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL 1, WO 8460 Acquire right, of way for channel improvements ENTRY Willow Dr. to Freitas Rd. Date Description 2. WO 8506 Prepare an easement for Urieh Oil Co.. at Waterfront Road. 3. WO 8505 Acquire right of way for storm drain .,_ construction, Kingsdale Dr. to San Miguel Rd. 4, WO 8788 Acquire right of way, at Rodeo Creek on completed Corps of Engineer project. 5�. WO 8789 Acquire one parcel and sell excess RW on APPROVED: ATU D E / completed project. AUDITOR— Y /l7 7 f 6. WD 8503 Acquire right of ways Pine Creek to Danid'Ave. CONTROLLE J and consolidate 74-75 budget with 73-74 carryover. COUNTY r 7. WO 5536 4625 Transfer balance on completed work ADMINISTRATOR: j"Z` ,? order and cover estimated cost td monitor. sewage floats Shore Acres. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors 1;enny. Dias. 'yorIarty, Noani :. J. R. OI.SSON CLERKby ? a. � it.iM.L��L/ Deputy'public Works Director I, Si tore Title , Date Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) e Journal No... See Instructions on Reverse Side r� 0Or m CONTRA COSTA -COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works-Building Otcs, RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special Fund Decrecse ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM • Increase Code Quandt ) Bud et Unit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1003 074-7750 001 Vacuum Wet & Dry 46 01 1003 074-7750 002 Vacuum Carpet 115 01 1003 074-7750 003 floor Pachine 58 01 1003 074-7750 008 Vacuum Shoulder 7 01 1 1003 079-7752 014 Desk Typist 226 01 1003 074-2102 000 Books & Periodicals 10 01 1003 076-2102 000 Books & Periodicals 10 01 1003, 075-7752 002 Desk 30 01 1003 075-2170 000 . Household :Expense 80 01 1 1003 , 075-7752 003 Chair 110 Lt b PROOF Comp.__ _K_P__ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY Date Description To provide funds for desk for Account Clerk and to provide funds for the purchase of trade periodical. APPROVED: SI TU DATE To provide funds for purchase .of .desk ;and to AUDIT = � N 1675 transfer funds for the purchase ;of non-capital CONTROLLER: C COUNTY item (chair). ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supemisors Kenny, Dias. Diorlarty, BOrzess, Unsehrm No:. L&?LL gAN 211975 Deputy Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON CLERK ? �� b Buildings & Grounds 1-;4-25 ' �c.d a. y / Signature Title Date !/ APProp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) O� `See Instructions on Reverse Side OJ= Journal No. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease Fund Decrease CR X IN.66) Code Quantic ) Bud et Unit Object Sub.Acct. EQUIMM OPEUTIONS Ol 1003 063-7753 001 1. Sedan - Compact 21,600. 003 1. Sedan - Heavy W/Air $0 015 1. Pickup 3/4T 210. 009 1. Sedan Patrol W/Air $ 22890• PUELIC WORKS 650-7754 734 2. Ft 2310 OTS $2 2310 2. To 7312 OTS Grant 82 PROOF Comp._ K_P=_r VER.! 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(if capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1. To l. „''cover outstanding purchase orders on Capita Dote Description Equipment. 2. Transfer to cover final cost of road rough ws Teeter purchased with Office of Traffic Safety-ar=t Funds (w1 539o). w APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR .� JAN 16 75 CONTROLLER: COUNTY f T. ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supendsors Kenny, Dias, Moriarty, Boggess, LAnscheid. NO-.. OJAN 2 19 J. R. OLSSON CLERK Deputy Public Warks Director lh6_115 :. bt 4. A ri r Y �l Signature APprop.Adj. Date Jou o. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) 'See Instructions on Reverse Side 00w ® CONTRA COSTA' COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works Department RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease Code Quontit } Fund Budget Unit Object Sub.Acct. r Decrease (CR X IN 66) SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION 01 1003 661-7600 995 1. Design Engineering 1,1177 MINOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION 01 1003 665-7600 542 1. Clifton Ct Rd 19177 PROOF —Comp._ K_P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL -- - 1. 2= Right of Way Engineering for extending ENTRY Clifton Court Road at State Intake Channel Crossing, Date Description WO 4153. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR CONTROLLER: Rh 6 COUNTY t ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 5upentsors Kenny, DW. 1lforlarty, B099ess, Unseheld. J. R. OLSSON CLERK 4 �"; �� .cil2/ Deputy Public Works Director 1�lET/7K, by1?1 1411 / i na re j Title Date G Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/b8) Journal No. `See Instructions on Reverse Side 0 . _• CONTRA• COSTA• COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Page 1 Of 2 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT pUILIC iof= RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantic ) BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) EQUIP14M GAUGES 01 1003 01 i2- 1011 Transfer Fm 652 $ 344 x, 1013 4,300 1014 2,500: 1042 19.9?20.; 1044 31,230 1060 9,650 1081 15000. 1082 1,5pp ; 2100 1,213 2102 560 2110 126 2111 3, 2130 030 2120 4,850 , 2140 2,640 216030 2170 12j,000 2200 80 2250 1'50. 2270 . . 12,100 : 2276 1,600 2281 1,Epp 2282 2302 16;100; 2303 2310 Qu 206 2477 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY is APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Fig@ Z Of 2 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decreaselncrecse Code Quantity) Fund Budget Unit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 661" COUNTY GARAGE & YARD Ol. 1003 652- 1011 Transfer to 062 0 344,690• 1013 4,300 1014 2,500 1042 19,720 1044 311230 1060 9:650 1081 1,500 1082 15,000 + 2100 1,v213 2102 560 2110 126 211.1 3030 2120 4,850 2130 2,640 a4O 30 2160 350 2170 12,000 2200 80 1'550 2250 2270 129100 2276 1,600 2281 1,600 2282 10000 2302 16,lOo 550 2303 2310 200 2477 200 (.a. 03,361. PROOF _Camp.` VM 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( if capital outlay, list items and cost of each} TOTAL ENTRY Combine County Garage appropriations into Equipllment Date Description Garages to effect combination of budget units, APPROVED: SI ES DATE AUDITOR— AN, 1 s'75 CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: I �� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Ifenay. i:,.ias. :Ioriartr, Boggess. Llnschell. NO:.'AQ'?t-.Q-'^' O H AN Y 2 L-i3,�-- J. R. OLSSON CLERK t Deputy Public Works Director 1/16175 by '} igga r Title Date f� App ap.Adi. �� Journal No. ( M 129 Rev. 216$1 See Instructions on Reverse Side 0-O40 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Page l of 3 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) Bud et Unit Ob"ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) ROAD MAINTSKME YARDS 01 1003 654- 1011 Transfer from 655,656,657 9;500. lolls 50" 1042 560. 1044 820 1060 490' 1081 2Y500 2100 25 2110 3045- 2120 2,550 2160 25 2170 1,400 2250 130 2260 360 2270 650 2281 2,075 2282 19500 2302 300 2310 100 2478 375 8822 6,000. RICHMOND GARAGE 655-1081 Transfer to 654 29500 2110 '725 2120 750 2170 100 2270 150 2281 600 PROOF _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL _ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Page 2 of 3 Public works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM` Decrease Increase Code :Quantity) Bud et Unit Ob'ect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) RICHMOND GARAGE-continued 01 1003 655- 2282 Tran Ifer to 400. 2302 300 2310 1:00 2478 375 BRffiYfWQOD GARAGE 656 2110 Transfer to 654 720 2120 1,000 2170 600 2250 130 I 2270 250 2281 1x125 2282 600 LAFAYETTE GARAGE 657-101-1 Transfer to 654 9,500 1014 50 1o42 56o 1044 820 1060 490 2100 25 2110 1,900 2'120 800 2160 25 2170 700 2260 360 2270 250 PROOF _Comp,,_ _K_P__ _V_ER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST If capitol outlay, fist items and cost of each) TOTAL 0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT �e 3 Of 3 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE PU$ZC WORM Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code Quontit ) Fund Budget Unit 06'ect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) _ LAPYY81TFs GARAGE',-continued 01 1003 657- 2281 Transfer to 654 1 350• 2282 500 8822 6,000 I I 32,-75 -755. PROOF _Comp._ _ _K_P;_ _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To consolidate Richmond, Brentwood and Lafayette Garai Date Description appropriations into Road Maintenance Yards to effect a combined budget unit. APPROVED: SI AE DATE AUDITOR- CONTROLLER: N 1 6 COUNTY w ! ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny, Dtns, hioriarty, Boggess, Unsimid. NO:. G�-h.�- JAN 21 197S J. R. OLSSON CLERK a R. n by /.Lt.r}�I".�� R2puty Pohl i e! W-rkm Dittietnr l.-16-75 -- CI i atuie Title Date Approp.Adj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/66) Journal No. •See Instructions on Reverse Side ,011e ' x CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT PROBATION -PREPLACEMENT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE BUDGET #320 Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) Fund Bud et Unit Ob'ect Sub.Acct, CR X IN 66) Q( 1003 320-1013 Temporary Salaries 6,862 320-1042 Fed. Old Age Survivors Ins. 402 312-3310 - Board & Care .7,264 PROOF Comp.__ _K_P__ _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To adjust temporary salaries in Pre-Placement Unit within Probation Department budgets to cover costs of temporary Date Description counselor time necessary to fill vacant Counselor III position until March 1 , 1975, plus incidental temporary shift coverage through June 30, 1975. Although the above results in permanent salary savings, adequate funds are available for transfer from the CYA APPROVED: eSE DATE budget Al11)I TOR- :_'CONTROLLER: 10INTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER- Y1 RDER:Yt S� SUpe %Iz-ors Kenny. IDLr9, Aloriarty, OLSSON T.000NTY PROBATION OFFICER 1/15/75 Ml�H, CLERK by , Signature Title Date tt .Approp.Adi. M 129 Rev. 2/68) OYW� Journal No. 'Tee Instructions on Reverse Side �J'x CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT PROBATION-SPEC.SUPV.BUDGET#324 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE GIRLS' CENTER BUDGET #321 Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund Bud etUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) p� 1003 324-1011 Permanent Salaries 7668 324-1042 Fed.Old Age Survivors Ins. 449 321-1013 Temporary Salaries 7668 321-1042 Fed. Old Age Survivors Ins. 449 324-1081 Labor Received 8117 321-1082 Labor Provided 81.17 PROOF C_omp.-_ _K_P__ _VER.- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL To transfer temporary salaries to Girls'- Center for Special ENTRY Supervision activity y performed by temporary D.P.O. II Date Description L. Spears, Empl. #07174, as follows: July, 1974 $ 1095 Aug 1148 Sept 1043 Oct 1148 APPROVED: ES DATE Nov 939 Dec 1095 n11r�ITOR- IAN 16 '75 Jan 1975(Est.) ---1�200 CONTROLLER: a�e /000 i iHINTY f ADMINISTRATOR: FICA @ 5.85% 449 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: Above adjustment also establishes labor received for Spec. YES,Supervisors Benny, Dias, Dtnrlarty, Supv. Budget #324 in an amount equal to the decrease in Bogge". Lin,,-':1+1. Perm. Sal & FOAS I . NO:. � r�AN 21 1975 I Q, R. OLSSON i 1wMMN, CLERK by y, n �.COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER 1/9/75. ? Signature Title6 Date ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) O>�� Journal No.Journal No. Sc�/ 7 'See Instructions on Reverse Side • CONTRA COSTA, COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT COUNTY COUNSEL 030 RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Fund CR X IN 66) Code Quantity Bud etUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. 01 1003 030-2 ZOO Account 2200 - Memberships 690.00 OI 1003 030-2-473 Account 2473 - Specialised Printing 690.00 PROOF CcLH-_ K4P_ VER•_ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL - ENTRY Membership account increase needed to cover management memberships allowed by Board as Date Descriptionmanagement January 1, 1975. Part of this increase is also because of an increase in NIMLO - • membership due in March. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE AUDITOR— .JAN is CONTROLLER: COUNTY �r ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Supervisors Kenny, Dt", moriarty,. Boggess. Liartcheid, N0:AAI(Y - A N 2 ,I. R.OLSSON CLERK ' '? ounty Counsel 1-1.4-75 4 r r Yf Signature Tpt1e !• / Dote Ad" e�a /.E'' ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) No. See Instructions on Reverse Side 'j� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Social Service RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Increase Code Quantity) Fund Bud et Unit Obiecr Sub.Acct. Decrease CR X IN bb) 01 1 1003 504-7751 002 Typewriter, electric, dual pitch 650.00 (10 and 12 per inch) 01 2 1003 509-7751 002 Typewriter, electric 1205.00 01 1 1003 509-7752 012 Chair, executive 110.00 01 1003 500-2170 Household expense 1 ,965.00 PROOF Comp.__ _K_P__ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST( If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY The dual pitch electric typewriter is required for use at the Rodeo Community Center for typing court reports Date Description in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule. 501b, which requires that all papers filed with any court be in type not smaller than pica size. We need dual pitch so that the smaller pitch can be used for other work. The Rodeo Office is very small and does not have a pica type typewriter available. It seems more economical to get a APPROVED: SIGNAES DATE dual pitch typewriter than to have the pica typewriter as AUDITOR- an extra to be used just when court reports are being CONTROLLER: 16 75 typed. See attached copy of letter to John Davis from COUNTY Judge Calfee. ADMINISTRATOR: 43 A The two typewriters for Cost Center 509 are to replace BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: the two stolen on 11/25/74 from the Stanwell Drive Office. YES: Supervisors Iienrty-, Dias, 'too:i rtY. (explanation continued on attachment) NO:. � t-Q ' o JA y J. R. ousoN CLERK R. E. Jorn1 i n Director 1/15/75 Signature Title yy Date � Approp. NaAdj. ( M 129 Rev. 2/68) Journal , 'See Instructions on Reverse Side 0004 1 -2- (continuation of Explanation of Request) County tag numbers are 84032 and 81546. The Police Report. and request for release from custody have been sent to the County Administrator separately. The chair is needed for furnish an office for the Assistant Director, HRA--Management, who spends more than half of his time at Stanwell Drive. CHAMBERS-OF DAVID W. CALFEQ Juooc �1hE �fnnicipa1 (grur# RICHMOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 100 THIRTY-SEVENTH STREET P. O. SOX 307. STATION RICHMOND. CALIFORNIA 94809 October 31, 197+ Mr. John Davis County Probation Officer Administration Building , . Martinez, California Dear Mr. Davis: California Rules of Court, Rule 501b, rnqulre s that all punt*rn filed w1 th tiny court be in type not smaller than pica size. I have been fighting with your Rodeo Office for years to persuade them to discard their elite machines, with very little success. It now aooears that the disease is spreading to your ;Management Division. I would greatly appreciate it if you would see that all of your offices discard their elite machines at their very earliest convenience in favor of those with approved type. Very -truly yours, i rG AVID W. CALF F BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Abandonment of ) Drainage Easement, Lots 6 ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/30 and 7, Subd. 4234, ) Pleasant Hill area. ) Date: Januar, 21 1975 Resolution & Notice of Intention To Abandon County Road (S.& H. Code §§956.8, 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Couny RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code it declares its intention to abandon the hereinafter described County Road. 10:30 It fixes Tuesday, March 4 19752 at 18 a.m. (or as continued) in its Chambers , Administration Bu lding, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing evidence offered by any interested party as to whether this road is unnecessary for present or prospective public use. This matter is referred to the Planning Commission for report before the hearing. The County Cleric shall have notice of this matter (1) published. in the Contra Costa Times , a newspaper of general circulation published in this County which is designated as the newspaper most likely to give notice to persons interested in the proposed abandonment, for at least two successive weeks before the hearing; and (2) posted conspicuously along the line of this road at least two creeks before the hearing. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "a" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: Jim. Orosco ^o. tib!_.. .':orks iii r2 to:' Planning Commission _ County Administrator Draftsman Newspaper Purchasing f VJW:bw (Res. & Not . Aband.) 75/30 (CC-71:250: 8/72) RESOLUTION NO. , REVISED DESCRIPTION FOR ABANDONMENT OF PORTION OF STORM1I DRAIN EASEMENT LOTS 6 AND 7 SUBDIVISION 4234 A portion of the "Drainage Easement" lying within Lots 6 and 7, as said drainage easement and lots are shown on the map entitled Subdivision 4234 filed August 16, 1973 , in Book 161, Pages 48 thru 50 in the Office of the Recorder, Contra Costa County, State of California, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner- of said Lot 6, thence from said point of commencement North 350 11' 32" East, along the southeaste-rly line of said Lot 6, 48.25 feet to the northeasterly line o= the "Drainage Easement" shown on said map (161 MB 48) ; thence along said northeasterly line North 610 57' 45" West, 37 .50 feet to the true point of beginning for this description; thence from said point of beginning South 510 35' 38" jest, 10.91 feet; thence South 770 00' 54 ,lest, 21.35 feet; thence Porth 380 24' 22" West, 57.40 feet; 0 thence North 67 53 ' 49" West, 36.25 feet; thence North 22G 03 ' 45" East, 4.85 feet to the northeasterly line of said "Drainage Easement" thence along said northeasterly line South 610 57' 45" East, 109.65 feet to the true point of beginning. L4!JV1ll i:!L9ll 1l tril 0000 i F BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Resolution and Notice of Intention ) to Sell Excess Flood Control ) District Property ) RESOLUTION NO.-75/59 Rodeo Creek Channel ) Parcel Nos. X59 - X18.1 - X27.1 ) (Gov. C. Sec. 25520 et seq.) Work Order 8788 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and -Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT: This Board determines that the following real property is no longer necessary to be retained for the uses and purposes of said District. Parcel Minimum No. Location Description Bid X59 On east side of Rodeo Creek A triangular shaped landlocked $200.00 between 3rd St. and Torry Ave. parcel of land containing approx. 1,150 sq. ft. X18.1 On west side of Rodeo Creek An irregularly shaped parcel $500.00 fronting on north side of of land containing approx. Investment St. 2,425 sq. ft. X27.1 On west side of Rodeo Creek A rectangular shaped landlocked $500.00 east of Parker Ave. and parcel of land containing approx. south of 4th St. 4,500 sq. ft. This Board, therefore,- declares its intentiod-to sell said real property for and on behalf of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District under the terms and conditions contained in the Notice To Bidders on file with the County Real Property Agent, 5th Floor, Administration.Building, Martinez - California. Said terms and conditions, as prepared by the County Real Property. Agent, are hereby approved. The Board authorizes that the sale be conducted by a County Real Property Agent. This Board sets Saturday, the 1st day of March, 1975, at .11:00 a.m. in front of the Veterans Memorial Building, 336 Rodeo Avenue, Rodeo, _California, as -the time and place where sealed proposals and auction-bids shall be opened and - considered. The Clerk of this Board is directed to cause the attached notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the time and place of holding said public sale to be given by publishing said notice, pursuant to Government Code Section 6063, in the TRI-CITY News, a newspaper of general circulation published in said County, and by posting notices of said intention signed by the Chairman of this Board, in three (3) public places in the County, as follows: 1 . On the property described herein. 2. At the Rodeo Public Library, Rodeo, California. 3. At the County Administration Building, Martinez, California, not less than fifteen (15) days from the date of said sale. PASSED on Jan. 21 , 1'47� by at least two-thirds (2/3) vote of this Board. Attachment cc: Supervisor Alfred M. Dias Administrator Auditor-Controller Public llorks Dept. - RP (2) Flood Control District RESOLUTION NO. 75/59 00051' NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL REAL PROPERTY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra_ Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District has, on they/dday of :,ns 192-5, in regular meeting adopted a Resolution No. 75/-,.59 by a two-thirds (2/ vote f all its members declaring its intention to sell for the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District the real property located along Rodeo Creek Channel in the Rodeo area, California, as described below. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that it is proposed to sell said property consisting of three separate irregularly shaped parcels of unimproved land to the highest bidder for cash; that Saturday, the lst day of March, 1975, at 11:00 a.m. of said day, in front of the Veterans Memorial Building, 330' Rodeo Avenue, Rodeo, California, has been fixed as the time and place when sealed bids will be opened and considered, said bids and bid deposits being not less than the following amounts: Parcel Minimum Bid No. Location Description Bid - Deposit X59 On east side of Rodeo Creek A triangular landlocked $200.00 $20.00 between 3rd St. & Torrey Ave. parcel of land containing approx. 1,150 sq. ft. X18.1 On west side of Rodeo Creek An irregularly shaped parcel$500.00 $50.00 fronting on north side of of land containing approx. Investment St. 2,425 sq. ft. X27.1 On west side of Rodeo Creek A rectangular landlocked $500.00 $50.00 east of Parker Ave. & south parcel of land containing of 4th St. approx. 4,500 sq. ft. At the time set for the opening of bids, any person present may offer orally to increase the amount of the highest written bid by at least five percent (5X) and to continue there- after to bid orally in any amount until the highest oral bid is finally accepted. Parcels X27.1 and X59 are landlocked and without any direct access to any public roads and successful bidders shall relieve the County Flood Control District of any liability to provide access to said landlocked parcels. Terms and conditions for the sale, bid forms, and specific description of the property will be furnished by the County Real Property Agent, Fifth Floor, County Administration Building, Martinez, California (phone 228-3000, extension 2134), on application. Dated• 02/ / %7.5 es Chairman of the BoarSPW Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. J. R. OLSSO,N, County Clerk By. L w Deputy Cler OM2'. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUN'T'Y, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Abandonment of ) Utility Reservation in ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/60 portion of Amend Road, ) E1 Sobrante area. ) Date: Januqtry 21 1975 Resolution & Notice of Intention To Abandon County Road (S.& H. Code H956.8, 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Couny RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code it declares its. intention to abandon the hereinafter described County Road. March 4 1975 10.30 it fixes Tuesday, � at lid a.m. (or as continued) in its Chambers, Administration Bu lding, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing evidence offered by any interested party as to whether this road is unnecessary for present or prospective public use. This matter is referred to the Planning Commission for report before the hearing. The County Clerk shall have notice of this matter (1) published in the Indenendent a newspaper of general circulat on published in this County which is designated as the newspaper most likely to give notice to persons interested in the proposed abandonment , for at least two successive weeks before the hearing-, and (2) posted conspicuously along the line of this road at least two creeks before the hearing. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached 'hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. cc . P .G. -z E. , Co. , Caklind Planning Commission County Alministrator DrRftsman Newspq der Purchasing VJW:bw (Res. & Not . Aband.) (CC-71:250:8/72) RESOLUTION NO. 75/60 000W Amend Road Road No. 1565 Utility Reservation Abandonment in the Abandonment of a Portion of Amend Road EXHIBIT "A" Abandonment of utility reservations as stated in the."Reserving and Excepting" portion of the Resolution of Summary. Abandonment of Super- seded Portions of Amend Road (County Road No. 1565). Resolution No. 876, filed May 22, 1962 in Book 4124 of Official Records at page 661, Records of Contra Costa Co::nty, California, lying within the following described parcel of land: Portion of Rancho El Sobrante, described as follows: All of that portion of the 40 foot in width strip of land, formerly known as Amend Road, as described in the Final Decree of Partitioning of Rancho El Sobrante dated March 16, 1910 and recorded March 17, 1910 in Book 156 of Deeds at page 45 Records of said County, lying within the parcel of land described in the deed to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, filed February 21 , I969 in Book 5817 at page 84, Records of said County. RECEIVED JAN 131975 H N ON�,b► pCQ 00054 W SW PPn(1?-71_T) F",1 iTR�a „ �'�tiv Taw i AM Ti��i:T::�•T. n..• /�: ...»•.� C. TO CLERK BOELRD OF at O'clock :_- -- M. . SUPERVISORS Contra Cost-a County Records. J. R. OLSSO::, County Recorder Fee S Official - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA •COUINTY, CALIPO.:I:IA In the natter. of Accepting and Giving ) RESOLUTIOi: OF ACCEPTANCE Notice of Completion of Contract with ) andcCTICE�OF CO: PLETION 0. C . Jones and Sons (C.C. .9§3086, 3093) Project No. 2 31 --4165-74 RESOLUTIOi: NO. 75/61 . The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOL ES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on August 2,. 197 . cor_tracted tirith 0. C . Jones and Sons, 1520 Fourth Street, Berkeley, California 94710 Name and Address of Contractor) for Canyon Road Widening project from San Leandro•Creek to Country Club Drive, Moraaa area .with The American -Insurance Company as surety, Name of Bonding Company - for work to be performed or_ the grounds of the Count,-; and The Publin !corks Director reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved plans, special pro.*isiors, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of December 24, 1974 � Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Cohu�ty Recorder a copy of this aesolutioz and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract. PASSED JUM ADOPTED 011 Janua-ry 21 , - 1975 . CERTIFICATIOV and ZSRInICATIO I certify that the foregoir_g is a true and correct cop;{ of c Tesolu- tion and acceptance duly adopted and entered on t^e T--inu tes of it-his Board' s meeting on the above date. i declare under penalty of perjury that ti.e foregoing is -rue and correct. Dated: January 21 , 197; J. R. OLSSO'., Co*.int- Clerk &: at Martinez, California ex officio Clerk of the Board By Nanc gS. Orte a U Deputy Clerk cc: i:ccora ana re turn Contractor Auditor. Public Works Administrator FF.SOI;UTION NO. 75/61 . Form #9.5 00055 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) of improvements and declaring ) certain road as County ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/62 road , Subdivision 4275, ) Alamo Area. ) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having notified this Board that improvements have been completed in Subdivision 42759 Alamo area, as provided in the agreement heretofore executed by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4275, Alamo Area April 3, 1973 (The American Insurance Company - Bond No. SC 6256650) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Receipt No. 106204 dated March 6, 1973 ) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 8429(b) of the Ordinance Code as amended. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described road_, having been heretofore dedicated to public use by the filing of map in the office of the County Recorder, be and the same accepted and declared to be a County road_ of Contra Costa County: PEBBLE DRIVE ( 32/52/0.08) Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January , .1975 , by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: Recorder Public Works Director Subdivider /62 RESOLUTION N0. 75/62 Q��v IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT In the Matter of Approving Plans and Specifications for Contra ) Costa County Fire Protection ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/63 District Administration Building, ) Pleasant Hill Area. ) ( Work Order 5411 ) ) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications and the cost estimate for the construction of the new Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Administration Building at 2010 Geary Road, Pleasant Hill area, have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and a negative declaration of environmental impact pertaining to this project was posted and filed with the County Clerk on October 16, 1974; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and . IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that it determines that said project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and the Director of planning is INSS?RUCTED to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk: and IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica— tions are herebyAPPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on February 18, 105 at 11 :00 q.m. , and the Clerk of this Board is directed to pu ish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the LAFAYETTE SUN PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on January 21 , 1875 . cc : Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/63 00057 IN TFB; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU11;TY, STATE Or CALIFORNIA In the Fatter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/64 } WH&SAS, the Counuy Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition o_ escape assessments: N01W, THEREFORE., BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1971x.-75 It has been ascertained from papers in the Assessor's office that property belonging on the local roll has escaped assessment; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 531, escaped assessments should be added to the unsecured roll as follows: Graybar Electric Co., Inc. P. 0. Box 2528 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Assessed Code-Assmt�;' Class P.-Operty For Year Valuation 08061-60 ens Prop 1971-7- $5 530 — 08001-8085 Pers Prop 1972-73 485 08001-8084 Pers Prop 1973-74 455 08001-8083 Pers Prop 1974-75 435 Assessee has been notified. Xerox Corporation_ 5310 Beethoven St. Los Angeles, CA 90066 02002-8108 Pers Prop 1974-75 10900 02002-8309 Pers Prop 1974-75 1,130 08001-8087 Pers Proo 1974-75 3845 66088-8006 Pers Prop 1971s-75 11095 86005-8001 Pers Prop 1971;-75 3,055 Code 12083 - Assess-ment No. 8003For Year 1974-75 Ross Aragon ?. 0. Box 11002 San Francisco, CQ 94101 Assessed valuation - Personal Property 100 Assessees have submitted signed business property statements. R. 0. SE'�TO�T, Assistant Assessor tl/15/75 cc: Assessor (G. Giese) 00058. Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO 75/6!, Page 1 of 2 r Code 79138 - Assessment iio. 8001 For Year. .1974-75. -.' Jay & Barbara Forni 2449 Bates Ave. Concord, CA 94520 Assessed valuation - Personal Property 5,250. Code 77006 - Assessment No. 2247 For Year, 1974-75 Robert J. Athey, Executor for Helen M. Hetfield ?. 0. Box 97 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Assessed valuation - Personal Property 385' Less Bus Inv Ex 150: Assessees have been noti_ied. R. 0. SE_ATON, Assistant Assessor . Adopted by the Board this 21st day of January, 1975• RESOLUTION NO . 75/64 Page 2 of 2 vMoo IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Satisfaction of ) lien, termination of reimbursement ) agreement of Louise Wilks. ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/65 WHEREAS an instrument dated —JanuarX2l , 19 , which provides that for a valuable consideration had and receive by the County of Contra Costa, any and all liens created by virtue of a. reimbursement agreement and notice of lien executed by Louise Wilks on February 8 o'r granting o aid and assistance to said ise Wilks are hereby satisfied, anda11real and persona property of said Louise Wilks is released from the said lien, an sai referred-to reimbursement agreement is canceled and the agency created is terminated, is pre- s3ated to this Board; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THIS BOARD RESOLVED that said in- strument be and the same is hereby APPROVED and the Chairman of this Board is authorized to execute said instrument on half of the ,ounty of Contra Costa. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J, P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: County Auditor-Controller Central Collections County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 75165 69..6-500 Form #6.3 vu660 TER?1INATION OF REIMBURSEMENT LGREEMENT The REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT and NOTICE OF LIEN executed on February 8. 1962 by Louise Wilks and recorded in the official records in the office of the County Recorder of this County on February 14, 1962 in Volume 4656 at page ho is hereby released. Dated: January 21, 1975 By order of the Board of Supervisors. -' —W. N. Bo9g est CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Contra Costa On (date) January 21, 1975 before me, N. Ingraham a deputy county clerk of this county, personally appeared Warren N. Boggess known to me to be the person who subscribed this instrument and to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of this County and acknow- ledged 0.-.at he executed it. J. R. OLSSON, 11x=xFA=X, County Clerk by N. In aham Deputy County Clerk 00061 RESOLUTION NO. 75/66 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF BONDS, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3, SAN RAMON, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa has advertised for bids for sale of bonds to be issued to represent all unpaid assessments; and WHEREAS, Stone & Youngberg have offered to purchase all of the bonds representing unpaid assessments in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Notice of Sale for said bonds, and at the following price, to wit: 97% of the par value thereof and at the following rate or rates of interest:- 1976-86, 6.75%; 1987-95. 7%; "B" coupon 2/10/75 - 1/2/76: 1976-86, 1.25%; 1987-95, 1%. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervi- sors of the County of Contra Costa, California, that said bonds to be issued to represent unpaid assessments be sold to Stone & Youngberg at the price named in their bid on file herein, plus accrued in- terest from the date thereof until paid, and in accordance with all of the terms and conditions of the Notice of Sale for said bonds; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that bonds shall be issued to represent all of the unpaid assessments under the provisions of the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, under the terms and conditions out- lined in the Resolution of Intention, as amended, on file in these proceedings. -1- RESOLUTION NO. 75/66 00062 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, at a regular meeting there- of, held on the 21st day of January, 1975, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ATTEST: JAMES R. OLSSON, Clerk G71wiw By z Depu y cc: Stone & Youngberg Bond Counsel Engineer of Work Public Works Director County Counsel Auditor-Controller Treasurer Tax Collector County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/66 00063 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Amending ) Resolution Number 74/573 ) Establishing Rates to be ) RESOLUTION NUMBER 75/67 Paid to Child Care ) Institutions. ) ) WHEREAS this Board on June 241 1974 adopted Resolution Number 74/573 establishing rates to be paid to. child care institu- tions for the Fiscal Year 1974-1975; and WHEREAS the Board has been advised that adjustments in rates for certain of the institutions are necessary; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution Number 74/573 is hereby effective January 1, 1975 as detailed below: Institutions Monthly Rate Community of Concern $ 461 Clearwater Ranch 1,124 (private institution) Clearwater Ranch 13014 (group home) New Morning Home for Girls 865 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: Director, Human Resources Agency (4) Social Service (4) Probation (2) County Administrator County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NUMBER 75/67 t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA * COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT In the Matter of Authorizing ) Preparation of Engineer's ) Report for Investment Street ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/68 Storm Drain - Flood Control ) Subzone BA ) The Board of Supervisors as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District RESOLVESTHAT The Advisory Board for• Flood Control Zone 8A has submitted a request to this Board recommending that the Investment Street storm drain project be adopted as a supplement to the Flood Control Subzone 8A plan. This Board Hereby Authorizes the District staff to prepare an Engineer's report for said supplement. PASSED on January 21 1975-unanimously by Supervisors present. RESOLUTION NO. 75/68 cc: Public Works Director County Auditor County Administrator Flood Control (3) O0, w5 a .=r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, C014TRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re : Cancellation of ) - Uncollected Penalty & Interest ) dmiry 210, 1975 On Assessment reduced by ) _ Ldate . Assessment Appeals Board/Officer ) ) (Rev. & Tax. C. §52922.5, 1}985) Auditor's t-.emo: 'Pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code. _ Secs. 2922.5 and -4935, I recommend cancellation from the following assessments on- the--unsecured roll, -of penalties and interest which have attached erroneously because- such assess- ments were reduced by the Assessment Appeals board or the - Assessment Appeals Hearing Officer. - - H. DONALD FUNK, I consent to -this cancellation. County Auditor-Controller - JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By rti ` By -RICHARD-A. BaRT0LA=0 ' -7 Deputy Deputy —x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x—x—x—x-x—x—x—x—x—x—x— Board's Order: Pursuant to the above authority and recommendation, it is ordered that the County Auditor cancel penalties and interest on the following unsecured assessments: 8007 2147 90M ?4z4 - i Adopted by the Bogrd this 21st day-of January, 1975- Auditor 1 I certify' that this is a full I correct co3y Tax Collector 1 of Board action on the above date by unanimous Unsecured 1 vote of Supervisors present . J.R.OLSSON, - County Clerk & ex officio Clerk of the Board. Deputy; or january 21, 1975. 00066 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 . 19 7 In the Matter of letter from Walnut Creek Resident with respect to Animal Control Policies. A January 8, 1975 letter having been received frost. Mrs. Beverly L. Fall, 31 Juana Court, Walnut Creek, California 94596 complaining that animal control policies with respeet .to assisting in the recovery of lost or stolen animals (particu— larly horses) are inadequate and detailing certain suggestions for changes in procedures; On motion of E-upervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super— visor J. r'. Kenny, IT 15 BY T:U� BOAP.D ORDERED that the aforesaid natter is rZF,.t�;Rft-D to the Agricultural Commissioner for review. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. H. Bliss, J. E. Moriarty, L. A. z inscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOBS: ?gone. ABSENT: ?tone. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Firs. Beverly Hall Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agricultural Commissioner Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 21st day of January 19 _U County Sheriff—Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator � j " ��.� ; By l�-eP C /ru�� . Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall 0OW7, i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 1975 In the Matter of Letter from General Manager, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, Berkeley, with respect to retribution of Food Stamps. This Board having received a January 9, 1975 letter from Mr. R. W. Hunter, General tianager, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, 1414 University Avenue, Berkeley, California 94702 advising that the Credit Union intends to terminate its agreement for distribution of food stamps as of March 10, 1975 and requesting that the Board waive the full 50-day-notice requirement and approve termination of said agreement effective February 28, 1975; On motion of Supervisor A. X. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is R''FFURRED to the County Auditor. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. 1=. Dias, J. y. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W" N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Fir. R. W. Hunter Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor Supervisors Director, Human Resources affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 Agency County Administrator I - - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 1 d��',' Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M —Bel en C.—Marshall In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19U_ In the Matter of letter from Pittsburg Resident with respect to the American Revolution Bicentennial Committee of Contra Costa County. The Board on January 14, 1975 having made its appointments to the American Revolution Bicentennial Committee of Contra Costa County as recommended by Mr. J. T. Riteh, General Manager, Contra Costa County Development Association; and Mr. Ritch having been appointed to serve as secretary of said committee; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having this day brought to the attention of the Board a January 17, 1975 letter from Dr. Irene Fontaine Won, 126 Leland Road ,West, Pittsburg, California 94565 expressing interest in serving on the committee as a repre- sentative of Pittsburg and requesting that she be appointed to help in that capacity; On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY Tom. BOARD ORDBRED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the American Revolution Bicentennial Committee, Mr. J. T. Ri.tch, Secretary, 838 Escobar Street, Martinez, California 94553. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Fenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc-. Mrs. Irene Fontaine Won Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of American Revolution Supervisors Bicentennial Cte. affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BDeputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Helen C. Fla-r-8-Rill VV Vw In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Letter from Social Service Unit 1G1, Pleasant Hill, with respect to State Disability Benefits. This Hoard having received a January 9, 1975 letter from members of Social Service Unit 1G1,, Pleasant Hill, urging the Hoard to approve for county employees the State Disability Benefits indicated to be available under pending legislation; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super— visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD O..RDERm that said reQwat is REFERRED to the Employee Relations Officer. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. co: Social Service Unit IGl Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Employee Relations Supervisors Officer affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 Acting Director of J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Personnel County Counsel By f�6,tA) L �j' �!� ��- Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15•M Helen C. MarshalI 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 In the Matter of ` Letter from Senator John A. Nejedly with respect to Plan 7 {l to Guide Uses of Resources of f Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. This Board having received a letter from Senator John A.. Nejedly, Chairman, State Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife, advising that he is considering introducing legislation which would result in the preparation of a comprehensive conserva- tion development plan to guide the uses of the resources of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and soliciting suggestions in connection therewith; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said communication is REFERRED to the County Administrator for review with the Delta Advisory Planning Council. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct appy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Senator John A. Nejedly Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Room 2203, State Capitol Supervisor Sacramento, Ca. 95814 affixed this 21st day of Januar9 19 _a County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning Public Works Director BY �' �`�- -�-�� . Deputy Clerk H 24 12J&vMnmental Control Helen C. Marshall County Counsel 000z i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 7_52- In the Matter of Report of 1975 Administration and Finance Committee with respect to the county ordinance governing public health licenses and fees. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, Chairman, Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny, member) having reported orally this day on behalf of the committee with respect to the county ordinance governing public health licenses and fees, and having noted that the Board on December 17, 1974 had made its determination on amendments to said ordinance and that the fees become effective March 1, 1975; and Supervisor Linscheid having indicated that no further committee action is in order at this time and therefore having recommended that the matter be removed as a committee referral with the understanding that the County Administrator in conjunc- tion with the Acting County Health Officer will review the matter further during the coming year and report to the Board in the fall of the year; and Supervisor Linscheid having further recommended that in view of the foregoing the Special Committee heretofore established by the Board to study the county' s public health licenses and fees be dissolved; and On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afore- said recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Acting County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Health Officer Supervisors County Counsel affiXed this 21st day of January 19 Z5 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Administration and U Finance Committee By Gk Deputy Clerk H sa 1W74Mr'5"'John F. Roscoe L. Kincaid 00072 i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of Administration ) and Finance Committee on Request for ) Funding from the Contra Costa County Drug ) January 21, 1975 Abuse Council Board. ) ) Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, Chairman, Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. P. Kenny, member) having submitted a report this day on behalf of the committee with respect to a request from the Chairman, Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Council Board for continuation of financing for certain programs operating under Short-Doyle funding (Senate Bill 714); and Supervisor Linscheid having advised that the committee had met with Mr. R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, and had received recommendations from him as well as from the Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board; and that based on the committee's review of the matter, recommends the following: 1. The Board of Supervisors extend Contract No. 24-749 with the County Superintendent of Schools (Drug Education Center) from its present termination date of February 28, 1975 through June 30, 1975; 2. The Board augment the aforesaid contract by a total of $36,254 for the above-stated period, with the understanding that no additional county funds are needed to accomplish this augmentation; 3. The Board extend Contract No. 24-746 with the Pittsburg Community Hospital District (Los Medanos House ) from its present termination date of December 31, 1974 through June 30, 1975; 4. The Administration and Finance Committee retain as a referral a request from the Human Resources Agency for up to $10,000 in county funds for augmentation of Contracts No. 24-745 (E1 Sobrante Activity Center) and No. 24-746 (Los Medanos House), and reconsider such request at its regularly scheduled meeting in March. 5. The Board deny all other requests for funds for drug abuse programs based on lack of available funding; 6. The Board direct the committee to meet in March with Mr. Jornlin, at which time he should present to the committee a thorough analysis of all drug abuse programs, including an analysis of their organizational relationship to mental health; their fund- ing source; the relative effectiveness of each program; and his recommendations for any changes needed to more effectively admin- ister such programs; and On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee are hereby APPROVED; and 00073 d The foregoing order was passed by the following vote r AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, " J. E: Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and -correct. copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on January 21, 1975• Witness my hand and the. Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January, 1975• J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By T Maxine M. Nejffeld Deputy Clerk cc: Administration &Finance Committee Director, Human Resources Agency (5) County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 00074 l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 119 -2.5- In 19 -2.1In the Matter of Planning Commission Initiated Rezoning (1940-RZ) in the Alamo Area. Mr. and Pius. Roy Sumner, Mr. and Mrs. William Graves, Owners. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the County Planning Commission with respect to rezoning changes in the Alamo area, 194.0-R•Z, and no one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that no Environmental Impact Report was required in this instance; and On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Planning Commission to rezone 3.72 acres, more or less, located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Miranda Avenue and Roundhill Road, Alamo area, from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District- 20 (R-20) is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in "The Valley Pioneer." The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seai of the Board of Otmers Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 �j J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By9 - . - ` Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Dorot y Lazzarini 00075 n . � l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia January 21 , 1975 In the Matter of Requests of Ruben Ortiz to Rezone Land in the Brentivood Area (1728-RZ) and for Approval of Land Use Permit Number 75-73• The Board having heretofore continued to this date the hearing on the request of Ruben Ortiz (1728-RZ) to rezone certain land in the Brentwood area and for a land use permit (Number 75-73) to expand an existing auto wrecking yard; and The Board having received a memorandum from Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, recommending that aforesaid hearing be postponed for six months as requested by Mr. Ortiz; On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recom— mendation of the Director of Planning is APPROVED and the hearing is continued to July 2 4 1975 at 11 a.m. The foregoing order eras passed by the following vote.- AYES: ote:AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of 'an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: Mr.. Ruben Ortiz Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 21st day of January . 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bye �c .� t , Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Dorotkly Laz ` rini M76 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 019 , In the Matter of Application of Industrial Tank, Inc. (Land Use Permit 377-73) to Establish a Class I Disposal Site, Brentwood Area. The Board having heretofore fixed this date as the time for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Comaission with respect to the application of Industrial Tank, Inc. (Land Use Permit 377-73) to establish a Class I disposal site in a Heavy Agricultural District, Brentwood area; and Chairman W. N. Boggess having declared the hearing open, asked if there were any persons wishing to speak on the aforesaid proposal, and having noted that no one in the audience wished to speak; and The Board on January 14, 1975 having declared its intent to continue the aforesaid hearing to February 24, 1975 at 8 p.m. ; On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the application of Industrial Tank, Inc. is continued to February 24, 1975 at 8 p.m. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Industrial Tank, Inc. Supervisors Attorney John A. Bohn affixed this Plat day of j =Aqr , 19 7r Mayor G. G. Gambel J. R. OLSSON, Clark City of Brentwood �/ Director of Planning By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Public Works Director Vera Nelson Health Department In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County Pertaining to Regulations for Public Lands. The Planning Commission having recommended to the Board a proposed amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County (Section 82-2.0011) which would regulate all private and/or public uses of private and/or public land within the unincorporated territory of this county; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Tuesday, February 11, 1975 at 11:05 a.m. is fixed as the time for hearing on the afore- said proposal, said hearing to be held in the Board Chambers , Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California. The foregoing order Was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheld, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of East Bay Municipal Supervisors Utility District affixed this 21st day of January 1975 Frank and Lucy Viera J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Mr. Robert B. Maddow gy Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15-M tsar enning OU07s i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 7r In the Matter of Amendment to the Recreation Element of the County General Plan, County Service Area R-8, Walnut Creek Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends Approval of the above amendment; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, February 11, 1975 at 11:10 a.m. in Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the "Contra Costa Times." The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: City of Walnut Creek Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Community Development Dep%Opervisoss Attn: Mr. E. Peabody affixed this2lst day of January , 1975 City Managers Office Attn: Mr. R. Pond _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works By `' Deputy Clerk H 24 12naAti%,%: Mr. J. Fears Mary enningt aw vv0'79 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 75 In the Matter of Letters from Social Services Union, local 535, AFL—CIG Requesting Board Support of Certain Legislative Measures. The Board having received January 13, 1975 letters from IMr. Desi Lewis, Field Representative, Social Services Union, Local 535, AFL—CIC, 293E 24cClure, Oakland, California 94609 urging that the Board support State Legislative measures SB 28 and AB 244 and Congressional measure S 4119 which, the union indicates, would relieve financial problems and funding of social services, specifically the Homemaker program; On motion of Supervisor A. X. Dias, seconded by Super— visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOA_ O^�TEREr that this matter is REFFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: An-S: Supervisors J. P. Benny, A. M. Dias, J. Z. :Moriarty, K. A. Linseheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: N one. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: ins. Desi Lewis Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director, Human Supervisors Resources Agency affixed this 21st day of January , 1g 75 County CounselJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator `7 By 1 tI-rX�'_A.�/ �- �� r�Y . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall �0V In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 7-5- In the Matter of Preservation of Agricultural Lands. The Board having received a letter from Mr. T. J. Nelson, E1 Cajon Ranch, 3500 Echo Springs Road, Lafayette, California 94549 transmitting a copy of an article written by Mr. Philip Hudner entitled "In Support of the Williamson Acts' (a long range plan in California to preserve agricultural lands in perpetuity); On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid letter is REFERRED to the County Administrator to answer, - explaining the present status of the Land Conservation Act in Contra Costa County. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. 11. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. T. J. Belson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard H 24 5/74 -12.00 00081 i FL CAJON RANCH 3500 Echo Springs Road Lafayette, Calif. 94549 January 8, 1 n Supervisor Edmund A. I3.nscheid VED District No. 5 P. 0. Box 911 Martinez, California 94553 J. R. ClER:C AitO 0j ?-cRV150 fRA A Dear Mr. Linscheid: B — -' The WILLIAMSON ACT passed in 1965 was pointed towards a long-range plan in California to preserve some of our agricultural lands in perpetuity -- for posterity. You are of course familiar with this Act. Amendments since 1965, and the application of its provisions in the different counties, have since broadened the Act's usefulness in California in attaining these ecological objectives. And yet the popular consensus remains as one of suspicion -- suspicion that someone is not paying his full share of taxes in the provision of free education and other services for the residential "bedroom" areas. - As a positive step in the evaluation of this Act, "10 years later".. I'm enclosing for your interest an analysis by Philip Hudner. Here I'm only concerned about California's future. I've long since lost hone, and abandoned intent, to have Pin one-man green-belt crone under the scope of Contra Costa's rendition of the Act's basic provisions. The end of my costly, 40-year operation seems inevitable. Sincerely, ' T. J. ?:oi son `AT:kas Riclosure 00082 "IN SUPPORT OF THE WILLIAMSON ACT" For those California cititens who are seriously interested in preserving California's re- maining rural atmosphere, here is a re-print of a recent article appearing in CALIFORNIA - FAiIE4. Author Philip Hadner presents a good case FOR land conservation under the much- maligned Williamson Act. The aggrieved urban taxpayers and militant ecologues would do well to re-examine their own stand, in light of what is, in reality, the first and probably the least costly step in land preservation in California. Text: Reproduced by nermdsston of CALIFVR14IA FA114-R, and the complements of Ted Nelson, a native son, class 'lilt. - November 1971 - 00083 n In support . of the W. illiamson Act FMITOR'S NOTE Mr. Hodaer federal,state or local level, it does wonder Whether the land around not involve either big spending or the outskirts of most California Calls bimu if a landowner aid eun' a complicated bureaucratic appa- towns is worth preserving (his- sensuenieL He wrote tho paper ratus. Its administration is rela- toric and certain particularly well- for a Cosu,oawee,Hi Club study of tively simple and the price tag is located towns eiocepted). land use, open spwa, eta measured by loss of revenue rather than government expenditures to As to most -'prime agricultural ' "FTE LAND Conservation Act of enforce regulations, establish and lands," the damage has been done.- ` 1965, or Williamson Act. has maintain hearing boards,pay staff Artichoke and tomato tielda co- been under heavy criticism from salaries and the like. exist with billboards,used car lots, several sources. The most publi- bowling alleys and other highly cized of these criticisms has come In view of the above. the Wil- visible signs of --slurW superim- from environmental "purists" who liamson Act's unpopularity is not- posed on a formerly bucolic scene. obviously think that any conserves- surprising. On the other hand, aft- So much for "prime agricultural tion law which private landowners er eight years of the Williamson lands." Grazing land is environ- can live with comfortably cannot Act there has been an amazing ab- mentally purer and usually'.mote possibly advance the cause of true sense of critical examination of its scenic- conservation. purposes and effect. The following takes up seriatim the six points of The second criticism. that urban A newer source of criticism of criticism entione spraw is the the Williamson Act has been what of chapter eight of the final draft corollary of the first and just as might loosely be termed "the of the Report on Open Space. unjustified. The Williamson Act townspeople" in rural and subur- cannot eliminate the complex eco- ban counties where a high propor- nomic, demograph1q and social. . _ tion of grazing land is under Wil- The fust of these, that prime te' liamson Act contracts. These crit- aare not being problems which create "urban preserved, goes to the purpose of sprawl." This is not, however, a ics, mostly homeowners and small the Williamson Act.Looking at the valid criticism of the Williamson businessmen. have shown an un- legislative history and early forms Act, which is aimed at long range derstandable tendency .to blame of the Williamson Act, there was environmental protection rather the Williamson Act for their rising indeed an emphasis on "prime" than immediate restrictions in ur- taxes. agricultural lands and elaborate ban areas. definitions and distinctions based The tax burden has unquestion- dde type ns s agricultural use. Even so, Williamson Act pre- ably shifted to a'degree which can serves can be found close to be felt by non-Williamson Act tax- But the Williamson Act has been "slurbs," indeed right-across; the- payers in"cow counties"and "bed- seriously amended since its enact- fence from them. As pointed out room counties," but.this result is ment. The -amendments together above, this. is a. questionable—de :. nor necessarily unjust or undesira- with the application of the Act velopment, but it is preserving ble as will be seen below. have for practical purposes re- open space.It is not a fair criticism duced the agricultural use distinc- of the Act to say that it does not Another less voluble source of tions to a nullity.This makes sense do more when it dors what it does criticism is governmental author- since the Act's main focus has, in vary well. ities on the local level, e.g., county the Age of Ecology, been on the supervisors and county assessors. preservation of the environment TIM TH® criticism of the who dislike the loss of tax revenue from an aesthetic standpoint rath- Act,that it is voluntary, must ver- from Williamson Act land and the er than the preservation of prune tainly be condemned in a free so- budget balancing problems result- and apricot orchards as agricul- ciety. Compulsory action is rarely ing therefrom. Local politicians tural entities. referable to voluntary have shown at restraint in their Stronger medicine p tory action in than the Williamson Act would be the attainment of public goals.The attitude toward the Williamson required for the latter object. final draft refers to the specious Act considering the disparity be- argument that "only the people tween the votes of open space who do not intend to develop their landowners on the one hand and PRESERVATION of "prime ag- land anyway within the neat 10 everyone else on the other. ricultural lands," often located on years are hely to sign an agree• level areas near towns, is therefore menta' NOR IS the Williamson Act ex- irrelevant since these might have actly a bureaucrat's dream in view no scenic or aesthetic value at all. Landowners do not go into the of the fact that, unlike almost ev- Indeed one well-traveled through Williamson Act fo4w, ery other conservation law at the the California countryside might forever. Certainly 0 tend to develop. That is the whole districts, the fair minded observer point. Their intent is reinforced by could reply that this Toss of rev This is not the place to chal- a prohibition against developing enue is the cheapest open space lenge the bases of a fashionable without severe penalties and un- yet secured to the public. Surely but ignorant approach to govern• likely governmental cooperation. the reservation of o mental policy as it affects Calitor- The chronological and geographi- P pen space can- ria land. is call f c not be accomplished without cost y� pen spat cal pattern of Williamson Act con- to anyone. If the public wishes to the >s a good thing then the more of tracts h almost every county retain what is left of California's it the better and big landholdings mented shows the caution and r where e Act has been nd re-e- natural charm uncontaminated by should be welcomed- luctance with which landowners tracts service stations, trailer In point of fact, some counties have embraced the AcL parks, eta the public must pay a have minimum acreage require. price. menta for Williamson Act cm. The fourth criticism, that open tracts, e.g., 100 acres. The actual space is no permaaen y preserved This Price is much greater in pattern of landholdings under the under the Act,is based on the com- terms of acquisition costs and loss Williamson Act indicates that monest fallacy about the Act, i.e., of tax revenues where there is an there is no size pattern at all and, that it provides for 10 year con- outright public taking as opposed conceding the argument that sin. tracts. The "non-renewal" escape to the more novel arrangement un- gle ownership of large acreages in hatch exists legally but for prac- der the Williamson Act which pre- bad, the Williamson Act and open tical purposes is well fastened serves private ownership and the space policy are unsuitable ve. down by the penalties flowing from Payment of taxes along with se. hides to deal with the problem non-renewal. vere restrictions in the public in- terest. In summary, the Williamson Act The illustration cited in the final- Incidentally, the enactment of after coming under sustained criti. draft to bolster this criticism is the Williamson Act was an un- cisco from aggrieved urban tax. not only inconsistent with the first usual and commendable joinder payers and militant ecologuM and second criticisms that land of agricultural and conservation should now be recognized as the with the most potential for devel- first and perhaps most sensible opment is not under the William- trarg°�' Most agriculturalists,environs, con- and least cos - . MOW- son Act but is pure invention. The dog to militant environmentalist vation of natural step California. It has final draft accurately points out nom' are O conservationists,ms= certainly been the most effective not developers. The Williamson that "very few notices of non-re- Act is living and rare proof that in terms of locking up a huge pro" newal or cancellation requests agricultural landowners in general portion of California's most beau- have eauhave been filed." are not out for the last buck and WW privately owned land for the that the scenic enjoyment of future genera- UNDER STATE Preservation le environ- guarantees that city dwell- guidelines re- Lural land is a desirable environ- tiO�-It quiring drastic and immediate as- mental goal and worth the cost. ers on their way to state and na- sessment increases upon the filing tional parks and other publicly of notices of non- renewal, and iri THE SIXTH criticism of the held, nontax paying enclaves will view of the county assessors' dim Act, matit subsialzes large hwd- be able to pass through miles of view of Williamson Act contracts owners, originates in a kind of Open countryside taxed at its in- (not to mention non-renewal no- "black legend" historically lurking come-producing value. tices), the consequences of fling behind uninformed urban opinion The urban and suburban them could be too damaging for about California agriculture. This which ]tab shown such banentpinata the landowner to contemplate. opinion, which may once have had for open space, already has the some validity, views California ag- Wi To the fifth criticism of the Act, riculture as a feudal system dorm- Williamson orlliamson Act to thank for much m- of ll and that it reduces a ax base of lo- nated by corporate overlords who Posterity should be even cal agencies, particularly school more grateful, subjugate their Mexican serfs. CALIFORNIA FARNK WOW 19, 1974 35 00085 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California nnijnry 21 19 73-- In the Matter of Hearing on Proposed Abate- ment of Property Located at 2A34 Birch Street, Martinez Area, Title Insurance and Trust Company, et al. , Owners. This Board on September 30, 19711 having.held a hearing on proposed abaterent of property located at 24311 Birch Street, Martinez area (Title Insurance and Trust Company, et al. , owners) , and having approved a one-year extension in the proceedings to permit a prospective buyer to consummate purchase of the property and reconstruct the building and/or improvements thereon to meet code requirements; and Mr. R. J. Milgate, Deputy Building Inspector, having this day reported to the Board that it appears the anticipated sale of the aforesaid property will not be consummated, that the building is still unsecured, that debris has not been removed from the site, and having requested that the Building Inspection Department be granted Jurisdiction in the matter; and Mr. Dwight Williams, P. 0. Box 648, Martinez, an'individ- ual with an interest in the property, having appeared and inftcated that because of legal proceedings involving the property he was unwilling to make any commitment with respect to a renovation pro- gram at this time, and having requested that action on this matter be withheld for 30 days ; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Mr. Williams is APPROVED and a 30-day extension in the abatement proceedings is GRANTED on the condition that Mx. Williams clean the site to the satisfaction of the Building Inspection Department. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on this matter is continued to February 18, 1975 at 10:40 a.m. The foregoing order was passed by a unanimous vote of the Board. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Dwight Williams Supervisors County Building Inspector affixed this 1st da oE7 197 (6) 2 Y anuar.�— J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BDeputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M � Mary `Wennington W086 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 1075 In the Matter of Assembly Bill 280. Supervisor J. P. Kenny having this day called attention of the Board to Assembly Bill 260 which would revise the organi- zation of the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, including provision for some elected directors and for amalgamation with any multifunctional regional organization with directly elected members on its governing board; and Supervisor Kenny having advised that the Board of Directors of the aforesaid district had taken a stand in opposition to the bill; and Supervisor Kenny having suggested that said measure be referred to the County Administrator for analysis and report to the Board, and having so moved; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having seconded the motion, the vote was as follows: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor A. M. Dias. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January 1975 �J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B *11 D u Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-MyMaxine M. Neu ld 0000( I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 . 19 In the Matter of Statewide Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program. This being the tine for a representative of the Department of California Highway Patrol to discuss its proposed Statewide Abandoned Vehicle Abateient Program; and Sergeant D. W. Sly of the Sacramento office having appeared and commented briefly on the proposal; and Mr. C. A. Hammond on behalf of the County Administrator having advised that the program has been changed from that heretofore considered by the county; On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Benny, IT YS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afore- said matter is REFERRED to its Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) and the County Administrator for review. The foregoing order w6a passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this ?_1st day of January , 19 7_�_ County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel ByDeputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M may Pennin, on 0000 in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 7,5„_ In the Matter of Letter from Mrs. William Rogan with Respect to the Contra Costa County Welfare System. The Board having received a letter from Mrs. William Rogan, 104 John Gildi Avenue, Antioch, California 94509, com- plaining about the welfare system and expressing the opinion that eligibility criteria and welfare allowances are not equitable; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said letter is ACKNOWLEDGED and this matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc- Mrs. William Rogan Witless my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Baalard H 24 5/74 -12,500 00089 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 197-5.- In 925_In the Matter of Report of Chairman, Emergency Medical Care Committee. with respect to Contra Costa County Ambulance Association Proposal. Dr. Charles Phillips, Chairman, Contra Costa County Emergency Medical Care Committee, in response to an August 13, 1974 Board referral, having submitted a report dated December 23, 1974 containing committee recommendations on the Contra Costa County Ambulance Association proposal as set forth in a July 29, 1974 letter to the Board, for certain changes in ambulance regulations, rates and services; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super— visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY TME: BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid report is ACBNQVDEDGED and the recommendations contained therein are RE_FE11RED to the County Administrator for review. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Lias, J. B. Moriarty, E. A. hinscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. E I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: emergency Medical Care Cte. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ambulance Association Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21st day of January 19 _UDirector, Human Resources J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Agency Sheriff Coroner By �•�� L� %C� �ai.�:�L � Deputy Clerk 11 2a ' dtu>'t� Counsel Helen C. Marshall Auditor—Controller 0090 i + CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE COMMITTEE RECEIVED TO: James Moriarty, Chairman - JAN 151975 . Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors J.*R. ot55orr aFR RoAm of supiwm as FROM: Charles Phillips, M.D. , Chairman AV QQWRA o05Fw co. Emergency Medical Care Committee DATE: December 23, 1974 RE: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL The Rescue and Transportation Sub-committee has reviewed the proposed Ambulance Regulation changes and has made the following recommendations which were approved by the Emergency Medical Care Committee at its November 19, 1974 meeting: 1. COUNTY AMBULANCE REGULATIONS SHOULD BE BROADENED TO COVER ANY PUBLIC OR COMMERCIAL VEHICLE USED TO REGULARLY TRANSPORT INDI- VIDUALS WHO MAY REQUIRE MEDICAL ATTENTION WHILE IN TRANSIT. Specifically, we feel that public ambulances (e.g.,fire department vehicles),where used to regularly transport individuals requiring emergency medical attention,should i meet the same regulations as commercial ambulances. We also believe that it is useful to distinguish between emergency transportation services and non-emergency services but that each level should be covered by County regulations. As our Criteria and Standards for Emergency Rescue and Trans- portation Services indicate (see Attachment I) we feel non- emergency transportation services require lower standards than emergency transportation services. Please also note the in- clusion of standards for "ambucabs", i .e. , sub-ambulance transporting vehicles. The ambucabs are not presently covered by any regulations except minimal vahicle safety requirements established by the Department of Transportation. 2. THE COUNTY ORDINANCE SHOULD BE AMENDED TO: A. REQUIRE CERTAIN EQUIPMENT TO BE RETAINED IN AMBULANCES WHICH RESPOND TO EMERGENCY CALLS. In our Criteria and Standards we called for "minimal equipment and supplies required by the American College of Surgeons or equivalent", (Page 2, Attachment I). The equipment list in the Ambulance Association's proposal exceeds these minimum standards and with Zlight modifications represents an excellent equipment list. Our modified list (which representatives from the Ambulance Association have agreed to) is attached (Attach- ment II) with our changes noted. C, _ 00091 Microfilmed witii board order James Moriarty, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors +' December 23, 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL Page Two B. REQUIRE ALL AMBULANCE DRIVERS AND ATTENDANTS TO HAVE PASSED DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH APPROVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN (EMT-1) TRAINING PROGRAM BY JULY OF 1975. Ambulance drivers should have also completed Defensive Driver Training by the same date. Los Medanos College currently offers EMT-1A Training in Pittsburg. The EMCC has determined in order to have an effective ongoing training program in both east and west County, certain training aids are mandatory. (See Attachment III) We recommend that the County purchase these necessary training aids so that the course can be offered in at least two cities in Contra Costa and all ambulance personnel can be required to have a minimum of EMT-1 training by July 1975. In addition, we recommend that the County subsidize presently employed ambulance personnel at the rate of 50% of their current salary in order to take the required EMT-1 course. This subsidization should require a matching 50% by the employer and the program will be terminated July 1, 1975 after which time all individuals applying for an ambulance driver or attendant position must possess EMT-1A certification. We see this County-supported subsidization program as necessary in order to insure that current ambulance personnel possess minimal skills required to properly handle medically emergent conditions. C. REQUIRE APPROXIMATE MINIMAL AMBULANCE VEHICLE DIMENSIONS. With slight modifications, we approve of the Ambulance Association's proposed dimension. Our modified version is attached (Attachment IV) with changes noted. These dimension requirements apply to regular in-service vehicles. Backup or reserve units (which might be used if all other units are in service or in event of breakdown) should be required to meet State Regulations. 3. The EMCC agrees with the concepts that ALL PERSONNEL ASSIGNED TO DISPATCH EMERGENCY MEDICAL VEHICLES MUST, BY JULY 1, 1976, HAVE COMPLETED EMER- GENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN TRAINING COURSE SIMILAR TO THE EMT-1 COURSE FOR AMBULANCE ATTENDANTS. We feel that is is extremely important for communications dispatchers to have Emergency Medical Serviae training as their role is crucial in the functioning of an Emergency Medical System. While the Service Division, Office of Sheriff-Coroner, is the County's Central Dispatch Center, many medical emergency rescue calls presently do not go through the Communi- cations Division's office. In principle then, we would not want to limit the dispatcher EMT training to this office alone, but want to include all dispatchers - public and private - who are responsible for dispatching emergency medical units. However, since this could represent a great expense for training and since the entire question of how best to coordi- nate communications throughout the County for Emergency Medical Services is being discussed by our Communications. Sub-committee, we have referred L1l1A� James Moriarty, Chairman 'Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors December 23, 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL Pave Three this matter to our Communications Sub-committee for more definitive statement. WE ALSO ENDORSE THE PROPOSED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (Item 3, Reimbursement For Services, Ambulance Agreement, Proposed Draft, July 5, 1974). This states Ambulance operators are reimbursed for "uncollectible accounts arising from the transportation of persons to or from any appropriate emer- gency medical facility within the County when the patient is in need of urgent emergency treatment and said appropriate emergency medical facility is closer than the nearest County medical facility". State Law - California Administrative Code, Title 13, Section 11060)(2) - states: "In the absence of decisive factors to the contrary, an ambulance driver shall transport emergency patients to the most accessible medical facility equipped, staffed and prepared to receive emergency cases and administer emergency medical care appropriate to the needs of the patient." We certainly concur that this is proper medical care. We feel that ambulance operators should not be forced to suffer a financial loss for following proper medical practices and con - versly any possible financial incentive for taking a patient to a further. medical facility because reimbursement may be more assured should be removed. The Emergency Medical Care Committee was pleased at having the opportunity to comment on the proposed Ambulance Regulations and would welcome the opportunity to work with your office on drafting the regulations or assisting you in any way that we can. CP:BE:lp CHPA-CCC cc: Arthur G. Will , County Administrator 00093' RITKRIA AND ST;JurRDS ATTACHMENT I FOR - EMERGENCY RESCUE. A JD TIUV41SPORTATI ON SERV -S •1 purpose of this report is to set forth the manner in which rescue and ambulance units, both private and public, should respond to calls for help. General criteria for the sub- system of emergency rescue and transportation services are provided as well as specific standards for the various levels of service. Yet to be developed is the description and analysis of the level of services currently available. I. GENERAL CRITERIA FOR THE RESCUE AND TRANSPORTATION SUBSYSTEM A. Accessibility. Emergency medical service must be easily accessible at any time by the general public. A single, easy-to-remember telephone number should be established until "911" becomes a reality. Emergency response must be accessible to all, regardless of financial payment. + B. Availability- Emergency units must be available at all times to respond to calls for help. The initial "first-in" unit should arrive at the scene within five minutes of the receipt of call. C. Effectiveness. Performance standards for emergency units must be legally mandated. There must be an ongoing monitoring mechanism to insure that the standards are being adhered to. Sanctions must be provided to correct viola- tions. Medical records must be established on all patients_ and available for review by a representative and qualified emergency medical review panel. D. Efficiency. Only the level of service that is needed (or requested) should be provided_ Attempts should be made at each step in emergency response systems to secure a proper level (quantity and quality) of service, beginning.,. with public education, trained dispatchers (screening calls) , and triage at the scene and in the emergency facilities_ All emergency medical responses to calls for help should be coordinated_ This requires a communications sub- 01 system that has the capability to monitor the activities of all the components in the system. II. STANDARDS Presented below are State standards for levels of service. The availability of each level of service within the county will be dependent on need and availability of resources. In some areas, the levels of service may be provided through separate mobile units, while, in other areas, the same unit might be capable of providing several levels. These configurations must be resolved based on an analysis of eac community. The purpose of defining standards for each level-is to establish minimum acceptable levels of capability in order to perform a level of service. Wherever State standards are applicable and are higher, they will supersede these standards. A_ First-zn Unit. The function of the first-in unit is to assess the victim's needs, call for additional assistance as required, and then initiate basic first aid and/or cardio-pulmonary resusitation. The -first person on the scene may likely be a citizen_ A public education program should be developed to train the average citizen to carry out the above functions. However, the first authorized person on the scene will usually be a police officer_ Listed below are the minimum standards for the authorized 'first-in' unit. 00094 i • 1. Personnel: (1) person trained in AdvanWirst Aid and Cardio- - Pulmonary Resusitation;* 2. Equipment: One (1) Standard First-Aid Kit (or equivalent); other equipment, as recommended; r 3. Communications: Direct two-way communications with a dispatch center. B. Basic Rescue. The function of the Basic Rescue Unit is to provide the initial medical response to calls for help. Time is critical in many emergency situations, and trained professionals must be available within minutes, 'if maximum potential for victim recovery are to be realized. Listed below are the minimum standards for the 'basic rescue' units. It is expected that either the police or fire services would perform this function. 1. Personnel: Two (2) persons with Advanced Red Cross and Advanced Cardio- Pulmonary Resuscitation (driver must have Defensive Driver Training) Training; 2. Equipment: 1 Standard First-Aid Kit 1 Long Spine Board (or equivalent) 1 Positive Ventilating Resuscitator 1 Set Limb Splint Other equipment, as required 1 Mouth-to-Mask or Bag Mask Kit 3. Communications: Direct two-way radio communications with a dispatch center; 4. Response: Five (5) minutes or less to scene from receipt of call (in most calls) ; S. Performance: -Quickly assess the victim's immediate emergency care needs; -Call for additional assistance,as needed; -Render immediate life saving measures, as needed; 7,3equateZy prepare victim for transportation to a definitive medical care facility, if required; -Provide appropriate information to medical units upon their arrival and relinquish primary responsibility for medical. C. Basic Emergency Ambulance. In many emergency situations, the victim requires basic stabilization at the scene and transportation to a health facility. Basic emergency ambulance service should be available to respond to calls for help, stabilize at the scene and transport to a health facility, if required. Basic emergency ambulance service can be, and is, provided by private ambu- lance companies, fire and police services, hospital ambulance units, or within a separate public agency in the health department. Listed below are the minimum standards for 'basic emergency ambulance' service, regardless of who provides the service: 1. Personnel: A driver with Defensive Driver Training and EMT-IA certifi- cation;* attendant with E14T-1A certification.* 2. Equipment: Minimum equipment and supplies required by the American College of Surgeons or equivelent; 3. Communications: Direct two-way radio communications with central dis- patch center; direct two-way radio communications to appropriate hospitals; 4. Vehicle: Approximates the approved U.S. Department of Transportation Standards for Fnbularces; S. Records: Maintenance of medical records and other data on patient care, as required by medical review board (to be established); *Certified by County Health Office and State Department of Health. [2l 00095 of call _ter `.^1p; 7. Performance- - -If firs the scene, quickly assess v.im(s) medical needs; -Begin basic care, and transport to nearest hospital; -If basic rescue unit has arrived, ambulance attendants should report to officer in charge and assume primary responsibility for medical care. D. Emergency Paramedic Service. Paramedic rescue is the ability to provide sophisticated emergency care at the scene of an emergency within minutes of receiving a distress call from the public. Paramedic service is expensive and requires the skills be utilized on a regular basis to be effective. Therefore, the need for this service should be justified before implemented. Minimum standards for emergency paramedic services are: 1. Personnel: Driver with Defensive Driving Training and EMT-I Training and one advanced paramedic attendant with a minimum of 290 hours of emergency paramedic training.** 2. Equipment: American College of Surgeons required and recommended equip- ment (including portable heart monitoring apparatus, defibrillators and resuscitation drugs) j 3. Communications: Direct two-way radio communications at all times with an experienced emergency physician; direct two-way communications with a central dispatch center; 4. Vehicle: Approximates the approved U.S_ Department of Transportation Ambulance Standards; 5. Evaluation: Maintenance of a medical record for review by Medical Review Board (to be established) ; 6. Response: To victims in populated areas within 10 minutes of alarm to centralized dispatch center; dispatched to all serious medical emergen- cies where paramedical skills may be required. III. NON-F_M.ERGENCY SERVICES A. Non-emergency Ambulance Services_ In most communities,medical transportation of the non-critically sick and injured is provided by ambulances. Most _ standards at the national and state levels apply only to emergency ambulances. Yet, non-emergency ambulance units are transporting a particularly high risk population that often require some medical aid while in transit. Further, _ in times of large emergencies or disasters, all availaboe ambulance units -J are pressed into service. For these reasons, the following minimum standards for non-emergency ambulance units are provided: 1. Personnel: Driver with Defensive Driving certification. Attendant with Advanced First Aid and Advanced Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation; 2. Equipment:_ Minimum equipment and supplies required by American College of Surgeons approved list or equivelent; 3. Communications: Direct two-way radio communications with a dispatch center. B. Ambucab. Some handicapped persons and the chronically sick cannot use the normal means of conveyance and require specialized vehicles. Yet, these persons do not require a regular avbulance, and often cannot afford the costs associated with ambulances. To meet this need, a level .of service, often referred to as 'ambucab' do transport high-risk and handicapped persons, and as such, should be subject to certain minimum standards and certification_ The minimum standards for 'ambucabs' are: **Approved by the State, County Health Officer_ (3' 00096 1. Personnel: - Driver with Defensive Driving Training. - An attendant -- when prone, gurney patients are being transported -- with Advanced First Aid and Cardio- Pulmonary Resusitation. 2. Eauioment: - One (1) standard First Aid Kit (or equivalent) - One (1) Mouth-to-Mask or Bag-Mask Kit_ 3. Communications: - Two-way radio comm-unications to a dispatch center. " SMIcD:3E:l p 10/18174 [4l 00097 ATTACHMENT II AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT* a. Each ambulance which responds, or may respond to emergency calls, shall meet the following equipment requirements and shall provide the following . basic -equipment as well as compliance with all other applicable State,. City and County regulations: NOTE: Provisions should be established for inter-changeability of equip- ment between ambulances and hospitals in order to reduce trauma to patients after arrival at the hospital . 1. One �(1) scoop type stretcher with three (3) body straps. z 2. One (1) wheeled ambulance-cot, adjustable in height to-az-least t�L e}g -levels; capable of being tilted upward to a 60 degree sitting position. 3. A minimum of two (2) straps on each litter, wheeled cot and collapsible. 4. One-{13-litter-desigRed-!a-earry-paLieRt=ever-stairways-and-ether narrew-spaees-where-a-r=sTd-144p-,ter-eanRet-be-used7 5. Three (3) complete sets of orpharyngeal airways - adult, child, and infant sized. 6.• One (1) oxygen-powered, manually or'automatically triggered ventilation device capable ,of flowing 1 liter per second or higher. 7. One (1) bag mask or mouth-to-mask with masks in adult and child sizes. 8. All resuscitator masks pre-lnrlateo-and transparent. _ . 9. One (1) resuscitation board for administering CPR on ambulance cots or beds. A size of at least 19 inches by 20 inches. (Half backboard may satisfy resuscitation board requirement.) 10. Oxygen inhalation equipment - capable of delivering an oxygen flow of at least 10 liters per minute to two patients simultaneously. 11. Four (4) oxygen masks, semi-open, valveless,- transparent, and disposable. A size adaptable for adults and children. 12. A portable combined oxygen supply of at least 720 liters_ An installed oxygen supply of at least 1250 liters. (A total ambulance oxygen supply of at least 1970 liters.) 13. Portable and installed suction capability that will develop a. vacuum of at least 250 MM Hg. Portable suction equipment may satisfy installed suction requirement. 14. Two (2) sets of rigid pharyngeal suction tips and sterile tracheal suction catheters. 15. One (1) ba}r-ring-fewer-ex-thm}ty Hare or equivalent traction splint 4riRg-9-iRehes-in-dianeLer-;-everall-length-43-iRebes3 with commercial limb-support slings, padded ankle hitch and traction strap. 16. One (1) long backboard (spine board) with four (4) body straps, two (2) accessory straps. Minirum size: 72 inches by 16 inches. 17. 8Re-�13-hair-bae�:heard-�sherz-splRe-beard3-HTzh-scraps. - -1- 00010183 ' Ambulance Equipment {cont 18. Three (3) cervical collars - firm. Sizes of small , medium, and larg-e. 19. Pneumatic splints - tHa-424 one (1) each in .arm and leg sizes. 20. Fifteen (15) gauze pads or bandage compresses (or combination of). A size of at least 3 inches by 3 inched_ 21. Four (4) universal dressings. A size of at least 10 inches by 30 inches.. 22. Fifteen (15) thick dressings of the combine or surgi-pad type. A size of at least 5 inches by 9 inches. 23. Eighteen (18) soft roller self-adhering dressings. Minimum size: 3 inches by. 5 yards_ J 24. One (1) roll of aluminum foil 18 inches by 25 feet. 25. One (1) roll of 2 inch adhesive tape. 26. Two (2) sterile burn sheets. 27. Twenty (20) packages sponges. Minimum size: 4 inches by 4 inches, two (2) per package. 28. Six (6) 40-inch triangular bandages. 29. One (1) aneriod blood pressure manometer and cuff_ 30. One (1) stethoscope. 31. One (1) sterile obstetrical kit_ (1) Sterile gloves - 1 pair. (2) Scissors or scalpel - 1. _ (3) Umbilical cord clamps or tapes - 2. (4) Four (4) sterile dressings - sponges. Minimum size: 4 inches by 4 inches (5) Towels - 2. (6) Plastic bags - 2. (7) Obstetrical pad - 2. . (8) Receiving blanket - 1. 32. P.dison kit •: (1) Syrup"of ipecac (one fluid ounce). (2) Activated charcoal (one ounce). 33. Bae-{I�-bettle 1000cc Sterile Distilled Water for irrigation and bulb syringe. 34. Twenty-four (24) large safety pins. 35. Two (2) chemical cold packs. * EMCC deletions are in strife-ever type, additions in italic type. BE:lp CHPA-CCC -2- 11/19/74 2- 11/19/74 00099 _ -' 111 1111.HYt,�1 111_ .EQUIP►MENT NEEDED FOR CONT OUS EMT_TRAINING IN T140 AREAS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY $ per Item X r" Needed Total CPR Mouth-to-Mask g 25 8 $ 200 Recording- Annie 800 8 6,40.0 . Ambulance Cots & Belt 313 8 2,504 Anatomic Annie 220 8 1,760 Resusci-Baby 135 8 1,080 Airway & Breathing Intubation Models 435 8 3,480 Air Compressor 800 2 1;600 Laerdaie Jet Suction & 12 Refills 48 8 384 ' Set of Ai nays 10 8 80 Twin-o-Vac 174 8 1,392 Demand Valves & Dual Cylinder 442 8 3,536 Esophageal Airway 25 8 200 Bag Mask 100a Oxygen 80 8 640 Circulation Stethoscope 46 16 736 Blood Pressure Cuff 18 16 288 Bleeding Models 275 2 550 Obstetrics Model-Childbirth 255 8 2,040 Intravenous Infusion Trainer 115 8 920 Splint Hare Traction 126.50 8 1,012 Splints Inflatable 47.95 8 383.60 Scoop Stretcher 130 8 1,040 "Build-a-Board" 13Q g 1,040 Backboard 64.95 8 519.60 kestraints 90 8 720 Vacuum Splints 280 2 560 Carry Patients Stretcher Chair 105 8 840 Projectors Carrousel Projector with Tape Recorder 160 2 320 Miscellaneous 200 8 1,600 $ 35,825.20 CP:lp 11/27/74 OO100 ATTACHMENT IV r VEHICLES* a. Any ambulance used in emergency service, within this County, shall provide a patient area with the following approximate minimal dimensions: 1. Width 71 inches - maintaining 15 inches of space between the two litters. 2. Length - 116 inches - maintaining 25 inches at the head and 15 inches at the foot of each litter. 3. Height - a-iRiniflua-eT 54 inches floor to ceiling, 60 inches is preferable. 4. These requirements may �be delayed until replacement of existing units within their normal replacement program, not to exceed 5 years. * EMCC deletions are in stf4ke-ever type, additions in italic type. SE:l p CHPA-CCC 11/19/74 00101 Contra GJeta County Anvbu/ance .�*ociation MICHAEL'S AMBULANCE SERVICE _ P.O. BOX 136 CONCORD,CALIF.94522 [+�'[�j J ' ,jam j,�1 V ED July 29 , 1974 AUG ' 1574 1. R. O!SAN CLZGv apn3il O SU?�gVISOR$ Board of Supervisors e _ ;��It Contra Costa County Administration Building Martinez, Ca. 94553 Gentlemen: The Contra Costa County Ambulance Association, representing all private ambulance firms located in Contra Costa County, is respectfully reguestincr the Board of Supervisors to review and approve several changes in the present Ambulance Agreement, Ambulance Ordinance. Communications Agreement, Ambulance Regu- laions, Ambulance Rates Paid by the County, and other affected documents. Due to the rapid changes in all areas related to ambulance service, the above items have become obsolete, ineffective, and unacceptable to the ambulance operators of Contra Costa County. Tremendous cost of operation increases can be documented with no problem. Increased training standards have also added considerable expense and scheduling problems. Demands of all types coming from the public, the fire services, the cities, the County, the State, the medical profession and others have started a tidal wave of needed and desired changes. It is the intent of the Association to bring about immediate improvement in the services now being provided. At the same time, we trust that the Board will recognize their responsibility in assisting to bring about these changes. Working together the end result will be the ultimate in care being provided to the patient at the very lowest cost possible. This can only be accomplished by the united cooperation of private enterprise and government. The specific changes being presented by the Association ' for your approval include: 1. Adoption of the enclosed revised Ambulance Agreement. 2. Modification of the present Communications Agreement to comply with Section 6 of the above Ambulance Agreement. L � -- 001U Microfilmed wiffi S ar7 orae' 3. Installation of telephone equipment specified in Section 6 of the above Ambulance Agreement. 4. Change section 48-1.304. of the 'Ambulance Regulation Ordinance 70-77 to read as follows: "Ambulance means any vehicle specifically constructed, modified, equipped, or arranged, and used for the purpose of transporting sick, ill, injured, disabled, infirm, conva- lescent, or otherwise incapacitated persons and which responds or may respond to calls in this County. " 5. Add to section 48 - 1.902. of the Ambulance Regulation Ordinance 70-77 the following: "Ambulance services being operated by a City, County, State, or Federal agency shall be exempted from the fee. " 6. Add to section 48 - 1.904. of the Ambulance Regulation Ordinance 70-77 the following: "Ambulance services being operated by a City, County, State, or Fdderal agency shall be exempt from the fee. " 7. Add to section 48 - 1.908. of the Ambulance Regulation Ordinance 70-77 the following: "Ambulance services being operated by the City, County, State, or Federal agency shall be exempt from the fee. " 8. Change section 48 - 1.1106. of the Ambulance Regulation Ordinance 70-77 to show the age of both a driver and an attendant to be 18 years. 9. Delete section 48 - 1.1512, sub-section a (2) . 10. Addition to the County Ambulance Regulations, the following: SECTION 170. AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT. a. Each ambulance which responds, or may respond to emergency calls, shall meet the following equipment requirements and shall provide the following basic equipment as well as compliance with all other applicable State, City and County regulations : NOTE: Provisions should be established for inter-changeability of equipment between ambulances and hospitals in order to reduce trauma to patients after arrival at the hospital. 1) One (1) scoop type stretcher with three (3) body straps. 2) One (1) wheeled ambulance cot, adjustable in height to at least eight levels, capable of being tilted upward to a 60 degree sitting position. 3) A minimum of two (2) straps on each litter, wheeled cot and collap- sible. 4) One (1) litter designed to carry patient over stairways and other narrow spaces where a rigid litter cannot be used. 5) Three (3) complete sets of oropharyngeal airways - adult, child, and infant sizes. 6) One (1) oxygen-powered, manually triggered ventilation device capable of flowing 1 liter per second or higher. 7) One (1) bag mask or mouth-to-mask with masks in adult and child sizes. 8) All resuscitator masks pre-inflated and transparent. 9) One (1) resuscitation board for administering CPR on ambulance cots or beds. A size of at least 19 inches by 20 inches. (Half back- board may satisfy resuscitation board requirement. ) 10) Oxygen inhalation equipment - capable of delivering an oxygen flow of at least 10 liters per minute to two patients simultaneously. 11) Four (4) oxygen masks , semi-open, valveless, transparent, and dis- posable. A size adaptable for adults and children. 12) A portable combined oxygen supply of at least 720 liters.;. An installed oxygen supply of at least 1250 liters. (A total ambulance oxygen supply of at least 1970 liters. ) 13) Portable and installed suction capability that will develop a vacuum of at least 250 MM Hg. Portable suction equipment may satisfy 'installed suction require- ment. 14) Two (2) sets of rigid pharyngeal suction tips and sterile tracheal suction catheters. 15) One (1) half-ring lower extremity traction splint (ring 9 inches in diameter, overall length 43 inches) with commercial limb-support slings, padded ankle hitch and traction strap. 16) One (1) long backboard (spine board) with four (4) body straps , two (2) accessory straps . ?Minimum size: 72 inches by 16 inches. 17) One (1) half backboard (short spine board) with straps. 00104 i L 18) Three (3) cervical collars - firm. Sizes of small, medium, and large. 19) Pneumatic splints - two (2) each in arm and leg sizes. 20) Fifteen (15) gauze pads or bandage compresses (or combination of) . A size of at least 3 inches by 3 inches. 21) Four (4) universal dressings. A size of at least 10 inches by 30 inches. 22) Fifteen (15) thick dressings of the combine or surgi-pad type. A size of at least 5 inches by 9 inches. 23) Eighteen (18) soft roller self-adhering dressings. Minimum size: 3 inches by 5 yards . 24) One (1) roll of aluminum foil 18 inches by 25 feet. 25) One (1) roll of 2 inch adhesive tape. 26) Two (2) sterile burn sheets. 27) Twenty (20) packages sponges. Minimum size: 4 inches by 4 inches, two (2) per package. 28) Six (6) 40-inch triangular bandages. 29) One (1) aneriod blood pressure manometer and cuff. 30) One (1) stethoscope. 31) One (1) sterile obstetrical kit. (1) Sterile gloves - 1 pair. (2) Scissors or scalpel - 1. (3) Umbilical cord clamps or tapes - 2. (4) Four (4) sterile dressings - sponges. Minimum size: 4 inches by 4 inches. (5) Towels - 2. (6) Plastic bags - 2_ (7) Obstetrical pad - 2. (8) Receiving blanket - 1. 32) Poison kit (1) Syrup of ipecac (one fluid ounce). (2) Activated charcoal (one ounce) . 33) One (1) bottle 00cc Sterile Distilled Water for irrigation. 34) Twenty-four (24) large safety pins. 35) Two (2) chemical cold packs. SECTION 180. AMBULANCE TRAINING REQUIRFA14ENTS a. Every ambulance shall have a driver who has completed a driver training program, which has been approved by the Permit Officer, .within 6 months of assignment as a driver, either on a part or full time basis. 00105 b. Every person who serves as an ambulance attendant shall be required to have completed an Emergency Medical Training Program approved by the State Department of Health. Ambulance personnel shall possess a course completion certificate from a Community College, State College or University, Adult Education Class, or : an accredited Private College whose program meets the State Department of Health criteria, and whose certificate so states. SECTION 190. VEHICLES a. Any ambulance used in emergency service, within this County, shall provide a patient area with the following minimal dimensions : 1) width 71 inches - maintaining 15 inches of space between the two litters. 2) Length - 116 inches - maintaining 25 inches at the head and 15 inches at the foot of each litter. 3) Height - a minimum of 54 inches floor to ceiling, 60 inches is preferable. These requirements may be delayed until replacement of existing units within their normal replacement program, not to exceed 5 years. 11. Inclusion within the Sheriff's Office Communications Division, policies whereby any dispatcher assigned to the emergency ambulance phones . and "channel 3," the ambulance channel, shall have completed the same Emergency Medical Training Program required of ambulance attendants and shall possess a course completion certificate from a Community College, State College, or University, Adult Education Class or an accredited Private College whose program meets the State Department of Health Criteria, and whose certificate so states. It is additionally requested that this Board of Supervisors, by formal resolution, lend their full support and cooperation to the immediate development of a Paramedic level Emergency Medical System by the private ambulance firms within this County. This would include, among other things , the recognition at the proper time, of, and payment for, this level of service by the County. It has become apparent over the Past several _years that this level of service is desired by some within this County. 0106 It is, therefore, the responsibility of this Board of Supervisors to pledge their full support towards the development of such a system in the most logical and economical way possible. This obviously would be through the utilization of existing facilities and resources, in this case, the private ambulance sector, rather than the development of new additional, costly, duplicate, services. Your prompt action in the above matters will most certainly be recognized by the citizens of this County as positive evidence of your desire to provide them with the best emergency medical care possible, whereas delays or compromises will only become evidence of your desire to save money rather than lives. Sincerely, Michael E. Mickelberry President 0 f y Proposed Draft (7/5/74) AMBULANCE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES & DATE. Effective on , Contra Costa County ("County") and , an ambulance operator ("Operator") , mutually agree and promise as follows. 2. REQUEST FOR AMBUTs2UVCE SERVICES. The Operator shall respond to the County's requests for ambulance service including, but not limited to, transportation of patients to and from County medical facilities. The decision of the County to request ambulance service shall be based on the Emergency Response Area List provided for in County Ordinance Code 48-4.012 - .014 and 48-16.004 -.006 . County. Ordinance Code Division 48 and the Ambulance Regulations adopted pursuant to Ordinance Code 48-20.002 , copies of which are available to the Operator, are incorporated herein by this reference. 3. REIMBURSEMENT FOR SERVICES. The County shall reimburse the Operator for (1) uncollectible accounts arising from transportation of persons to and from County medical facilities, (2) uncollectible accounts arising from the transportation of persons to or from any appropriate emergency medical facility within the County when the patient is in need of urgent emergency treatment and said appropriate emergency medical facility is closer than the nearest County medical facility. Uncollectible accounts are those mounts both: (1) not covered by Medi-Cal, Medicare, or other insurances and (3) uncollected by the Operator after following the collection procedures agreed and prescribed by the Auditor-Controller and the Operator. A Copy of these collection procedures are attached 0108 i ( 9 -2- hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. Upon reimbursement for such uncollectible accounts, the Operator shall assign such debts to the County. 4. RATES. The County shall reimburse the Operator, as provided in Section 3, for its services under this Agreement, at the current Medi-Cal rates in effect at the time the services are rendered. S. "DRY RUNS". The County shall reimburse the Operator at the Medi-Cal rates for "dry runs" in effect at the time the services are rendered, when the Operator responds to a County request for service but, through no fault of its own, cannot actually render the services or transport the patient. 6. COMMUNICATIONS. The Operator shall have a fixed base of operations with telephone service where the County may call him. The County shall provide, at no expense to the Operator, direct private "tie-lines" to each location maintained by the Operator. The Operator shall have in each ambulance a radio of the type prescribed by the County which shall be provided, installed, and maintained by the County at no expense to the Operator, or which may be purchased, installed and maintained by the Operator, if he so desires and notifies the County Communication Division. If radio is purchased by the Operator, it must meet County Communication Division requirements . 7. LOAN OF EQUIPMENT. (a) The County may loan or exchange with the Operator, for use during transportation of patients from County medical facilities to other locations , equipment which is determined to be medically necessary during such transportation. This determination shall be made by the patient's treating physician or, if unavailable, by any other qualified County. medical -personnel. 00109 t ® -3- The County reserves the right for its County Medical Director or his designee to deny requests to borrow any equipment when he determines that such equipment is or may be needed at any County medical facility. (b) Form. Upon borrowing or exchanging equipment, the Operator shall complete a form provided by the County, which shall include the Operator's name, date, equipment description, destination, expected return date, and be signed by the Operator or its agent. (c) Return. Operator shall return equipment as soon as is practicable after transportation of the patient is completed. If a specific time is set for the return of the equipment it shall be returned by that time. If the Operator is required to leave said equipment with the patient at the receiving medical facility, and due to circumstances beyond his control, primarily that of conditions wherein the removal of, or immediate return of said equipment would be detrimental to the patient's well being, he shall no longer be responsible for said equipment. He shall, however, as soon as practical, notify the County medical facility of such circumstances. (d) Possession. Operator shall not allow loaned or exchanged equipment out of its possession, except under circumstances set forth in Paragraph (c) above. (e) Repair or Replacement. Operators shall pay the County for all repair or replacement costs resulting from its use of loaned equip=ment that occur as a result of the Operator's negligence. However, Operator shall not be responsible for damaged equipment transported at the County's request and which equipment is unsuitable for such transportation. 00110 -4- ;0 8. COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. In performing this agreement the Operator shall comply with all California laws and with all regulations adopted pursuant to Vehicle Code Sections 2500 et seq. and 21714 (see, for example, Title 13 , California Administrative Code, Sections 990 and following) . 9. INSPECTION AND AUDIT. The Operator shall maintain accurate records of its services and charges hereunder, which records shall be open for inspection or audit by the County Auditor-Controller at all reasonable times. 10. REFUNDS TO COUNTY. If an audit reveals that the Operator has received reimbursement from the County in excess of the proper amounts provided for in Sections 3, 4, and 5, such amounts shall be refunded immediately to the County. The Operator similarly shall immediately pay to the County any amounts it receives on accounts previously found uncollectible as provided in Section 3, up to the amount paid the Operator on the account as provided in Section 4. 11. TEM. The term of this agreement is one year commencing on the effective date thereof and continuing from year to year thereafter unless and until terminated as herein set forth. Either party may terminate this agreement upon 30 days written notice to the other; however, upon notice, the County may immediately terminate this agreement if the Ambulance Permit Officer finds that the Operator has not complied with any applicable State law, County ordinance, or regulation, or any provision of this agreement. 12. N_•lENDMENT. This agreement may be amended at any time upon 30 days written notice of one party to the other and upon written agreement and acknowledgment of the second party. 00111 L 13. HOLD HARMLESS. The Operator shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers , agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Operator, its agents or employees. The Operator shall not be responsible for acts or omissions of the County, its agents or employees. Subject to Section 7. (3) , the Operator is solely responsible for its use of medical equipment borrowed hereunder and its related services, however, he is not responsible for the use of medical equipment transported at the request of the County. 14. INSURANCE. During the entire term of this agreement and any extension or modification thereof, the Operator shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured with limits of at least $500 ,000 for each person and $1,000 ,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out 'of death,'.bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and $100 ,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. The Operator shall provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance, including a provision for 30 days written notice to the County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above-specified coverage. The Operator also shall provide the County with a Certificate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurnace coverage for 0r,�112 -6- its employees. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, its officers, agents, and employees , so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance. 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS. This Agreement is by and. between two independent contractors and is not inter ed to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. NON-ASSIGNABLE. This Agreement binds the Operator's heirs, successors , assigns, and representatives. The Operator shall not assign this Agreement, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the County's prior written consent. 17. NOTICES. All notices provide for by this Agreement shall be in writing, and may be delivered by deposit in the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, addressed to the County, c/o County Clerk, County Court House, Martinez, California 94553, or to the Operator at his place of business indicated below, and shall be effective when so mailed. OG+113- EXHIBIT "A" UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNT REIMBURSF24ENT PROCEDURES The following procedures shall be completed by ambulance operator when submitting demands for uncollectible accounts to the County for reimbursement. 1. When sufficient information is available to the Operator, an invoice shall be mailed to the guarantor within 15 days of the date service was rendered. If the Operator is unable to obtain sufficient information either from the patient, the receiving medical facility, or other sources, to reasonably expect delivery of an invoice, this shall not be necessary to effect reimbursement from the County. 2. At least three statements, sent at least 15 days apart, over a period of 90 days shall be sent to the guarantor. The last shall advise the guarantor that if the account is not paid within 15 days it shall be charged to Contra Costa County and assigned to a collection agency. 3. After the account has remained uncollectible for a minimum of 90 days, and a maximum of one year, from the date of service, and the requirements designated above have been completed the ambulance Operator may submit a County demand to the County Hospital Business Office assigning the uncollectible accounts to be paid by the County. The demand shall provide the following information, when possible: a. Name of patient. b. Date o� birth. C. Address of patient. d. Invoice number and date statements were sent to guarantor. e. Statement by the ambulance operator that all known sources were =pursed for collection and that the required 00114 _ invoice and subsequent statements were mailed to the guarantor. 4. Upon receipt of the above documentation, County shall reimburse tha ambulance operator in accordance with rates prescribed by the Board of Supervisors as provided in Section 4 and 5 of the Agreement. 5. Demands for reimbursement of uncollectible accounts for ambulance services shall be checked against the hospital files by the Hospital Business Office for Medi-Cal or Medicare eligibility status. Demands for payment for a Medicare or Medi-Cal recipient shall be rejected, except when accompanied by evidence that the claim was submitted in accordance with Medicare or Medi-Cal regulations and was rejected. In the case of claims rejected by Medi-Cal due to lack of the POE sticker and the County has said sticker in its possession, the County shall provide the POE or a copy thereof to the provider of service for their use. Oi115 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 1975 In the Matter of Request of San Ramon Valley General Plan Review Committee for Restrictions on Develop- ment in the San Ramon Valley Area. The Board on September 3, 1974 having requested the Planning Commission to initiate a public hearing on the proposal of the San Ramon Valley General Plan Review Committee that under certain circumstances no further development be allowed in the San Ramon Valley until July 1 , 1975; and The Board having received a January 8, 1975 memorandum from Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, transmitting a Planning Commission resolution (adopted after two public hearings) recommending that the request of the aforesaid Committee for interim growth controls not be granted; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid resolution is ACKNOWLEDGED and the recommendation of the Planning Commission is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Planning Commission Supervisor San Ramon Valley General affixed this 21 st day of JaUW"7 , 19 U Plan Review Committee Mr. Ralph Cozine J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning ng By � � Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-nn Vera Nelson Counsel County Administrator 00116 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 _U In the Matter of Memorandum Report of Acting Director of Personnel with respect to Potential Layoff of Six San Pablo Fire Protection District Employees. Mr. Charles J. Leonard, Acting Director of Personnel, in response to a December 30, 1974 Board referral,having submitted a January 13, 1975 memorandum report with respect to the potential layoff of six San Pablo Fire Protection District firefighters temporarily employed by the City of Richmond; and Mr. Leonard being present, having furnished background information and having recommended that the Board adopt the policy statement set forth in the report (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board) offering-, said employees the opportunity to transfer to the new River Fire Protection District effective July 19 1975 and to Contra Costa County Fire Protection District in the interim; and The Board having discussed the matter at some length with Supervisor A. M. Dias urging that the Board adopt the policy statement without delay and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid urging that the proposal first be submitted to the Committee of Fire Commissioners for the River Fire Protection District for its review and comments; and is. Leonard having indicated that he would be happy to meet with the Committee of Fire Commissioners to explain the situa- tion; On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that action on the matter is DEFERRED for two weeks and REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and J. E. Moriarty) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. cc: Fire Chief Albert V. Streuli Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Government Operations Cte. Supef11son Acting Director of dl6xed this 21st day of sanuary , 19 Z Personnel (2) County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ) County Auditor-Controller gy / ,�,J(� `&,fZ4 zJ_r , Deputy Clerk H za 12/ county Administrator Helen C. Marshall OC117 1 J a ,1 RECEIVED JAN 151975 CiVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT J. R. Oi_MON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONT CQ A C ._ Administration Building Martinez, California Date: January 13, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Charles J. Leonard, Acting Director of Persona _ SUBJECT: Resolution of Potential Layoff of Six San Pablo Fir otection District Employees As the Board of Supervisors is aware, a lack of funds has resulted in a need to find employment for six San Pablo Fire Protection District employees or to effect their layoff. For six months these employees have been working in the Richmond Fire Department on the basis of a contract with the San Pablo Fire Protection District. On December 26 a letter was received from Mayor Richard Nelson advising that the City of Richmond anticipated possibly terminating the contract approx- imately April 1, 1975. Unless present circumstances change, this contract termination will probably result in a layoff. During the last several weeks I have been working with Mr. Connery of the County Administrator's Office and Chief Streuli of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. Through the cooperation of Chief Streuli, I believe that a reasonable resolution of this potential layoff is possible. On July 1, 1975 the new River Fire Protection District will come into effect. Station 7 of the Consolidated Fire Department (West Pittsburg) will be absorbed within the area of the new Fire Protection District. The 14 employees assigned to this Station on July 1, 1975 are entitled to transition into the new district. Eight employees of Consolidated wish to transition to the River Eire Protection District. Six wish to remain with the Consolidated District and would be reassigned to other stations. Chief Streuli wishes to accommodate these long time employees of his District and believes that he can do so under present funding. This would result in sig vacancies at Station 7. The six San Pablo Fire Protection District employees could be offered the opportunity of transferring to this Station and thereby avoiding the possibility of layoff. They would then transition into the new River District effective July 1, 1975. . IV"IV, Microfilmed with 6oar7 oar AK63 Board of Supervisors 2. January 13, 1975 The letter from Mayor Nelson compounds this situation, however, in that it brings forward the date of potential layoff to April 1, 1975. I discussed this with Chief Streuli and he is agreeable that Consolidated will pick up the six San Pablo Firefighters effective April 1, 1975 if he is assured that effective July 1, 1975 they will transition into the River Fire Protection District and he can thereby use the six positions to transfer those displaced Consolidated District employees from Fire Station 7 to other Stations in his District. I believe this is a reasonable request and representss-a cooperative and helpful attitude on the part of Chief Streuli toward resolving this pressing matter. In order to consummate this agreement the Board of Supervisors is asked to adopt the following policy statement: tzThat the six employees of the San Pablo Fire Protection District who are exposed to possible layoff are offered the opportunity of transferring to present Station 7 (West Pittsburg) of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District effective April 1, 1975. It is understood that if they accept transfer they become a part of the workforce of Station 7 subject to being transitioned into the employment force of the River Fire Protection District July 1, 1975, under the terms and conditions of laws and policies applying to the establish- ment of the new Fire Protection District. Since the above transfers cannot be effected until April 1, 1975, it continues to be the policy of the Board of Supervisors as promulgated in its April 16, 1974 Board Order that all County Fire Protection Districts continue to consider the lateral transfer of San Pablo employees rather than hiring new firefighters for vacancies which may occur prior to April 1, 1975. If this report is accepted by the Board of Supervisors the Civil Service Department will proceed to implement it. CJL:mjb/jb VV119 l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 .01975 In the Matter of Approval of Agreement for Private Improvements in Minor Subdivision 100-74, Alamo Area. WHEREAS an agreement with Ms. Sandra Bennett, 1353 Pine Street, Walnut Creek, California 94596 for the instal- lation and completion of private improvements in Minor Subdivi- sion 100-74, Alamo area, has been presented to this Board; and WHEREAS said agreement is accompanied by a surety bond in the amount of $6,063.00 (No. SC 627 53 28) issued by Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies as security for the full amount of the costs for completion of the improvements required by the Board of Adjustment in approval of said minor subdivision; NOW, THEREFORE, on the recommendation of the County Building Inspector, and on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said agreement and the accompanying surety bond are hereby APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement in behalf of the County. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. ?Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, .4. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Applicant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Building Inspector Supervisors Grading Engineer affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By_ Deputy Clerk H sa 12/74 - 15-M Robbie Gut's rre z 0120 i MINOR SUBDIVISION AGREEME-NTN Subdivision: 9S1&0-74- Al 1� S bdivider: S N 4 (Private Improvements) C� w` i,l, CeRM 14„_ ect ve e: 1-14-75 (Contra Costa County §1 Completion Perio • cvlu2 Standard Form; 8-67) §3 Deposit: (faithful per opo 1. Parties & Date. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the above-named Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this sub- vision: 2. Improvements. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete private road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordi- nance Code, especially Chapter 5 (Sections 8490 et seq. ) of Division 4 of Title 8 and including future amendments, and all improvements required in the approved parcel map improvement plan of this subdivi- sion on file in the County's Building Inspection Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work" within the above completion period from date hereof as required by Section 8495(d) of the County Ordinance Code, in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a con- flict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. Improvement Security. (3 - Faithful._Performance) Upon executing this greemenY, u divider shall, in accordance with Section 8494.lo(b) (3) of the County Ordinance ;ode, deposit as security with the County at least the above-specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work, in the form of a cash deposit", a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faith- ful performance of this agreement. 4. Indemnit Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indem- nitees from a liabilities as defined in this section: A - The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards., commissions, officers, agents and employees; B - The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kin allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened be- cause of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unfore- seeable at any time before the County approved the parcel map improve- ment plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning . these; C - The actions causing liability are any act or omission (neli- gent or non-neg agent in connection with the matters covered by this agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them; D - Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not condltlorRed or dependent on whether or not any L demnitee has pre- pared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in con- nection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indem- nification covering any of these matters. 5. Costs. Subdivider shall pay when due all the costs of the work, inclu ng inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities re- quired thereby. -1- 00121 o. Non erformance and Costs. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements wit n the time specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges there- for immediately upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of- - this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys ' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by .County in connection therewith. 7. Assignment. If before these improvements are completed this minor subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. 8. Record Map. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdi- vider to fiTe and record said parcel map, and recognizes this subdi- vision as one complying with State laws and County ordinances, and the conditions of approval of the minor subdivision. COUNTY QF C RA COST SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) /-Z_1�4 z� C airman, Boatd o pervisors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON _, County Clerk By © wjv FR & ex officio Clerk of the Board Designate official capacity in the business) . By Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute RobbiV Gutie3&ez Deputy acknowledgment form below; and (2) If a corporation, attacE a certified copy of (a) the by-laws. or (b) the resolution of the Board of Directors, authorizing. execution of this contract and of the bonds required hereby. State of California ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, County of Contra Costa Partnership or Individual) On January 2, 1975 , the person(X) whose name(Z) is/S% signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individual as stated above who signed this instrument, and acknowledged *to me that she executed it. OFFicI—i SEAL LAURA E. MILES Notary Public for said County and State ot JOH.1 S. CLAU/`EN, Ceunsat _2_ DY De,Jty �"� 00122 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 In the Matter of letter from Contra Costa County Mayoral Conference with respect to Gasoline Price Posting. A January 15, 1975 letter having been received from Mr. John C. Houlihan, Executive Secretary, Contra Costa County Mayors' Conference, in response to a November 25, 1974 Board referral pertaining to the question of requiring gasoline station operators to post on their property the price of motor vehicle fuels; and Mr. Houlihan having advised that the members of the Conference were equally divided on the question and that there- fore it does not intend to proceed further in the matter; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid letter is ACKNOWLEDGED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Contra Costa County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mayors' Conference Supervisor County Counsel affixed this 21 gqt day of 18ary 19 _75_ Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Sealer of Weights & �►., Measures . Deputy Clerk H za ,ZV'irLbftor, Office of Helen C. Marshall Emergency Services County Administrator 0G12 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 -M In the Matter of Letter from President, League of Noreen Voters of Diablo Valley. The Board on January 15, 1975 having received a letter from Ms. Alice Johnson, President, League of Women Voters of Tiablo valley, 3557 :it. Diablo Boulevard, Lafayette, California 94549 concurring with goals and objectives cited by the Board Chairman, Supervisor 11. N. Boggess, for the 1975 calendar year; enclosing copy of a publication stating League position on current state and national issues; and offering its services to encourage more citizen participation and understanding of government and its processes and procedures; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super— visor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDEP s. that receipt of the aforesaid communication is ACKNOWLEDGED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dios. J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. I,. Boggess. NOES: atone. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Y.s. Alice Johnson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 21 st day of January 19 1 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 1 ' ' `".-r/ Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Helen C. Marshall 0124 hl In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Endorsement of the National Carpooling Campaign. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having called to the attention of the Board a December 20, 1974 letter from Mr. Claude S. Brinegar, Secretary of Transportation, Washington, D.C. requesting support of the national carpooling campaign which was designed to encourage Individuals, communities and private employers to initiate or sub- stantially expand carpool programs with the ultimate goal of increasing commuter occupancy of automobiles from the current 1.4 average to 2.0 persons per car; and Supervisor Moriarty having expressed the opinion that the Board should endorse the aforesaid program and encourage county residents who drive a car to work each day to form carpools in an effort to save gasoline which in turn mould aid national efforts toward energy conservation, reducing air pollution, and fighting inflation; On motion of Supervisor Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORDERED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors hereby endorses the national carpooling effort of the U.S. Department of Transportation, encourages all county residents to forma carpools , and directs that a copy of this order be sent to the Secretary of Transportation. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. 140ES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor A. M. Dias. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Secretary of Transportation Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Adninistrator upervisors affixed this 21st day ofJanuary 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Mar Penningto OC125 Y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Janugry 21 1975 In the Matter of Termingtion of Architectural Service Agreement, F2heriff's Rehabilitation Center - Phase II, Clayton Area. (Work Order 5370) The Public Works Director having reported that no work has been done on the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center for several years and the ultimate disposition of same is uncertain, and having there- fore recommended that the Board approve the Notice of Termination dated January 21 , 1075 with respect to the architectural services for the Center; and The Public Works Director having further recommended that his department be directed to ( 1 ) transmit the Notice of Termination to Dennis •& Cochrane, Inc. , Project Architect, ( formerly Dennis and McFarland) And ( 2) obtain from said firm the original tracings, sketches, calculations and all other pertinent information prepared by the Architect, in accordance with Article 7 of the original agreement; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Public Works Director are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: 4.None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21 s day of January 19 75 �,. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H za lzna - 15-M Nancy S. Orteg�f 1%)"(012 i NOTICE OF TERMINATIO .N January 21, 1975 Inasmuch as: (1) The ultimate disposition of the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center - Phase II is now uncertain; and (2) It is the desire of the County to indefinitely postpone further prosecution of this project; and (3) The Architect has been paid by the County in full for all of the architectural.services rendered to date, the County does hereby terminate the Agreement for Architectural Services dated April 25, 1967 between the County of Contra Cosa and Dennis b Cochrane, Inc., as of January 21, 1975 and as allowed by Article 7 of said Agreement. 0t�12`7 ■ y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 In the Matter of Preparation of a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for Contra Costa County. Mr. Greg Cook, Mayor of E1 Cerrito, and a Contra Costa County Mayors Conference representative on the Solid Waste Manage- ment Policy Committee for the County, having appeared and reported on activities of said Committee; and Mr. Cook having requested that the Board endorse the selection by the Committee of the firm of Metcalf and Eddy Engineers for the development of a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for the County, and that the Committee be directed to negotiate a contract with said firm for the preparation of same; and On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , seconded by Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of the Solid Waste Management Policy Committee is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc• C.C.C. Solid Waste Manage- Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ment Policy Committee Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Health Officer By. , ' Z, & ;` deputy Clerk County Administrator Mildred 0. Ballard H 24 5174 -izsoo V� l J , .197S . Report and Recommendation of the County Solid Waste Management Policy ) Committee to the Board of Supervisors ) I am Greg Cook, Mayor of El Cerrito, and a Contra Costa County Mayors' Conference representative on the County's Solid:Waste Management Policy Committee. The *Policy Committee has been meeting since January of 1973, to cope with ths:. complex problems_ of waste management within the"County and .to develop an acceptable and workable framework around which the Comprehensive Solid .Waste !Management Pian required under SB 5 (1972-Nejedly) can be developed.- 'This Plan must be approved by - the majority of the cities representing the majority of the population and by the.. Board of Supervisors and sub=itted to the State Solid Waste Management Board by the end of 1975. The framework, or scape of work, which has been developed, represents a working marriage between the private and public sectors which will ultimately result In significant benefits for the residents of Contra Costa County. This scope in- clude3 consideration of storage, collection, handling, processing Ckisourcw rscove1yl; and disposal of solid wastes as well as liquid industrial wastes. The scope of'wosk envisions the development of'the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan is ful]. cooperation and coordination with private industry, local public agencies, and with regional planning efforts. As was reported to you during your deliberations on the 1974 - 1975'Budget, the services of- a professional engineering consultant will be required to develop the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. You concurred and accordingly ap- proved funding for the study and Committee expenses in the amount of $125,000. The Committee cc.nta_-ted some fifty firms who had indicated an interest in developing this Plan, inviting thea to submit Statements of Qualifications. Twenty-five funs responded and of -hese, eight were selected to subait a Proposal. After extensive review of the Proposals and.oral interviews with each of the _- _ ,0012.9 prospective consultants, the Policy Coa=ittee has selected the firm of Metcalf_ and Eddy Engineers as being the most qualified and responsive to the'County's needs. It is,_ therefore, respectfully requested that the Board endorse the Committee's selection of the firm of Metcalf and Eddy Engineers and direct the Committee to negotiate a contract with that firm for the preparation of a CoMpre- hensive Solid Waste Management Plan for the County, I would also like to take this opportunity to= co=end Su=ervisor Dias _ upon his leadership as Chairman of the Policy Committee as well as congratulate him upon being elected Cb-3i—an of the State Solid Waste Manage=e-nt Board. • - 00130 _ 2 ': RPM - IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA in the Matter of Quotations ; January 21, 1975 for the Furnishing of ) Collection Services to the ) County. ) This being the time fixed to receive quotations for the furnishing of collection services to the county, the county being divided into tv.o separate geographic areas for the provision of said services, Area I being the western portion of the -county including the communities of El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, El Sobrante, Pinole, Hercules, Rodeo and Crockett; and Area II to include the remainder of the county, quotations are received from the follo.•:ing on the aforesaid basis and are read by the Clerk: Area I: CBI Collections - Oakland; California Credit Council; Area II: Business World Associates; CBI Collections - walnut Creek; Far ,,lest Collection Services, Inc.; Motivators, Inc.; and On motion of Su_oervisor E. A: Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afore- said quotations are REFERRED to the County Administrator and the County Auditor-Controller for review and report to the Board. The foregoing order eras passed by the following- vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: scone. Later in. the day CRs. George McClure, Chief Deputy County Counsel, having advised the Board that a bidder for a collection services contract had submitted a proposal after the 11 a.m. time scheduled for opening the quotations; and having recommended that the sealed quotation (submitted by Diablo Collection Service, Inc.) be referred to the County Administrator, County Auditor-Controller and County Counsel; and Good cause appearing therefor, on motion of Supervisor F. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the follo;,ing vote: AYES: Superv1sors J. P. Kenny, F-:. Dias, J. E. lJoriarty, E. A. Linscheid, IV. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cE-WnFtEv copy I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of cc' County Auditor-Controller the original document which Is on file In my office. and that is was passed & adopted by the Board of County Counsel Supervi-ors of Contra Costa County. California. on County Administrator the dale shown. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOB, County Clerk&ex-officio Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, by Deputy Cle:L on Jan. 21, Dorotht az ni 1975 00131 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Mattar'of Authorizing Provision of Legal Defense for Sheldon Sperber, M.D. On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County shall provide legal defense for Sheldon Sperber, M.D. in Superior Court Action Number 143517, Jessie P. Nelson vs. Contra Costa County, reserving all of the rights of the county in accordance with pro- visions of California Government Code Sections 825 and 995 and to withdraw authorization if it is determined that Dr. Sperber is not a county employee. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Counsel Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M N. Irgraham 0013,2 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 1973- In the Matter of Appointment to the Board of Commissioners of the Eastern Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County. The Board on January 7, 1975 having accepted the resignation of Mr. Frank S. Arata as Commissioner of the Eastern Fire Protection District of Contra Costa County; On the recommendation of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Ben H. Galvin, 5191 Morgan Territory Road, Clayton, California is APPOINTED as a member of the Board of Com.nissioners of said district to fill the unexpired term of Mr. Arata ending December 31, 1976. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Eastern Fire Protection District Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 21st day of January197 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BDeputy Clerk H 24 12174 - is-nn Mary Pennin ,ton AV V" IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of ) Claim for Damages. ) Rosemary de la Torre, 100 Clearland Drive, Apt. 4, West Pittsburg_, California, by and through her attorney, John Diaz Coker, 509 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, California 94565 having filed with this Board on January 13 19 75 , claim for damages in the amount of $ 1,000,000 (as of date of presentation) ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias . , seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said claim is hereby DENIED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January , 197 5 . R. OLs3OW U, CLERK By f_ . MaPenningt& feputy Clerk cc: Claimant Public Works (3 ) Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator 010134 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 U In the Matter of Fixing Payment Amounts for Election Officers and Rental of Polling: Places for Elections to be Held in 1975 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 16115 of the Elections Code, IT IS BY THE HOARD ORDERED that the compensation for election officers to conduct elections to be held in 1975 in the Contra Costa County precincts is fixed as follows : $31.00 for election Officer serving as inspector; $28.00 for services as election officers (except inspector) ; $3.00 for delivery of election returns ; $4.17 per mile each way for messenger who delivers said election returns. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the compensation for owners of polling places furnished for elections is hereby fixed at $25.00 for each polling place. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• County Clerk Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Elections Officer Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this2lst day of January 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15•M liar Penning on In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 75 In the Matter of Liquidated Damages in Connection with Construction of Marsh Creek Road Box Culvert, Clayton Area, Project No. 3971-4597-73. The Public Works Director on October 8, 1974 having reported that , in connection with the construction of a reinforced concrete box culvert on Marsh Creek Road at Donner Creek, 760 feet east of Mountaire Parkway, Clayton area, his department had received a letter from Filipovich Construction Company (the contractor) set- ting forth reasons why a contract time extension should be granted and the amount of liquidated damages ($6,375 for the 85 calendar day delay) modified; and further that the request would be analyzed and the findings and recommendations reported to the Board; and The Public Works Director this day having reported that an extensive review and analysis of inspectors' reports and diaries, construction records, and of the contents of the letter from the con- tractor,, has been completed; that it is found a 22 working-day extension of time can be made under the provisions of Section 8-1.07 of the Standard Specification; and that the overrun of contract time will thus become 52 calendar days, resulting in liquidated damages of $3,900 ($75 per calendar day) ; and The Public Works Director having called to the atten- tion of the Board that Section 8-1. 07 of the Standard Specifications permits the Board to substitute actual inspection costs (approximately $3,200) for liquidated damages; and On the recommendation of the Public Works Director and on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny) for review and recommendation. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Filipovich Construction Co.Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 County Auditor-Controller — County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ByDeputy Clerk Mildred a a H 24 5/74 -12,500 00136 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 'j,mj�. In the Matter of Granting Extension of Time in Which to File the Final Map of Subdivision 4542, Martinez Area. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning and on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Mr. Henry Hierhake (on behalf of Mr. Floyd Hightower) , 323 Sheridan Lane, Martinez, California, for a one-year extension of time in which to file the final map of Subdivision 11542, Martinez area, is GRANTED, thereby extending the final filing date to January °, 1976. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Henry Nierhake Supervisors Director of Planning Public Works Director affixed this 21st day of January 197y J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L i Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15•M Mar Pennin n , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75- In the Matter of Accepting Document for Recording Only, Oak Glen Court, Alamo Area. (Minor Subdivision 104-70) On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an instrument entitled Offer of Dedication dated December 2, 1974, from 'Alliam J. Hayes,, et ua is ACCEPTED for recording only. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the f minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Recorder ( via P.W.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Director of ?Tanning affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 County Assessor J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By z Deputy Clerk H za 5/74 -12,500 Nancy SOrtega 0138 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Approving Extension of Time for Road Closure of Freitas Road, Danville Area. (Work Order 4947) The Board on December 30, 1974 having authorized the. Public Works Director to temporarily close Freitas Road (Road No. 4723) Danville area, from January 6, 1975 through January 10, 1975 to allow the County Public Works Department to repair the deteriorated deck at the west end of the Frietas Road bridge; and The Public Works Director having reported that due to inclement weather, Freitas Road bridge repair in the Danville area was not completed as scheduled; and The Dublic Works Director having further reported that he has granted a prior approvRI for a two-dqy time extension of Freitas Road road closure through January 15, 1975 in accordance with Item 3 of Board Policy on road closures; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the action taken by the Dublic Works Director is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J . P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABBENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. c c• Public Works Director witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21 s t day of Jgnu ary , 19 75 JJ..--R. OLSSON, Clerk By X ' L Deputy Clerk Nancy Ortegq H 24 5/74 -12.500 00,x.39 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 75 In the Matter of Approving Grant of Easement from Southern Pacific Transportation Company for Road and Drainage Purposes, State Highway 4-North Frontage Road at Solano Way, Concord Area (P.U.C. Crossing No R0-4n_s-x-N)_ On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Grant of Easement for road and drainage purposes- (State Highway 4 - North Frontage Road at Solano Way, Concord area) from Southern Pacific Transportation Company, is ACCEPTED and Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute said Grant of Easement on behalf of the County; and the Board consents to its recordation upon execution and delivery by the grantor. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny , A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. 11. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 �c- J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 5 � _4.Z Z5 4 Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard } H 24 5,73 -12,500 V V 140 e • RAF++TVI 25020/323 11/22/14 APPROVED AS TO FORM BY GENERAL COUNSEL C.S.7362 MARCH 15, 1973 N,P.--BO-40•s$-N STREET OR HIGHWAY EASEMENT �tl iB fatUt=f. made this day of . 19 ,by and between con oration SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware herein called "Railroad",and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, County Administration Building, Martinez, CA 94553, herein called "Grantee": ��tal�lri4: 1. That Railroad hereby grants to Grantee the right to construct, reconstruct, maintain and use a street or highway. hereinafter termed"highway", upon and across the real property described on the attached Exhibit "A". 2. The rights herein granted are expressly limited vertically and shall not extend beyond a plane parallel with and twenty (20)feet above the roadway surface of the highway as originally constructed, except that'lighting fixtures and simi- lar highway appurtenances may extend above said plane, provided that any such facilities will be removed or rearranged within thirty (30) days after notification from Railroad that such facilities interfere with Railroad's intended use of the space above said plane. 3. This grant is subject and subordinate to the prior right of Railroad, its successors and assigns. to use all the pro- perty described in the performance of its duty as a common carrier, and there is reserved unto Railroad, its successors and assigns, the right to construct, reconstruct. maintain, use and remove existing and future transportation, communication. power and pipeline facilities in, upon, over, under, across or along said property. In the event Railroad trackage facilities. are removed from said property, Railroad shall not be obligated to make any change in the grade of said highway, nor shall such removal affect Railroad's title to the underlying property. This grant is subject to all licenses, leases, easements, restrictions, conditions, covenants, encumbrances, liens and claims of title which may affect said property, and the word "grant" shall not be construed as a covenant against the existence thereof. r 4. The rights herein granted shall lapse and become void if the construction or reconstruction of said highway is lot commenced within two(2)years from the date first herein written. 5. This grant shall not be construed as conveying or otherwise vesting in Grantee the right to install or to authorize the installation of any ditches, pipes, drains,sewer or underground structures, or the facilities of any telegraph, telephone or electric power lines in, upon, over, under, across or along said property, except as necessary for maintenance of said highway. 6. Grantee shall obtain any necessary governmental authority to construct, reconstruct, maintain and use said highway. Any contractor performing work on the property herein described shall execute Railroad's standard form of contractors agreement prior to commencing any work on Railroad's premises. 7. Except as herein otherwise provided, Grantee shall bear the entire expense of constructing, reconstructing and main- taining said highway. The crossing of said highway over any tracks of Railroad shall be constructed and maintained at the grade of said trach now or hereafter existing.After the construction or reconstruction of said highway has been completed, Railroad shall maintain the surface of that portion of said highway between lines two (2) feet outside the rails of each track located thereon. Should Railroad abandon tracks leading to said highway. Railroad may abandon its rails, ties and appurte- nant materials and leave same in place. In such event. Railroad shall not be liable for maintenance of the portion of said highway specified above. S. As part consideration herefor, Grantee agrees to pay-,Railroad an amount equal to all assessments levied by any lawful body against the property of Railroad to defray any part of the expense incurred in connection with the construction or reconstruction of said highway commenced within two(2) years from the date first herein written. 9. Should Grantee at any time abandon the use of said property or any part thereof, or fail to use the same for said purpose for a continuous period of one (1) year, the rights granted shall cease to the extent of the use so abandoned or discontinued, and Railroad shall at once have the right, in addition to but not in qualification of the rights hereinabove re- served, to resume exclusive possession of said property or the part thereof the use of which is so discontinued or abandoned. Upon termination of the rights hereby granted, Grantee agrees to remove said highway, including the paving, from said property of Railroad, to restore said property as nearly as practicable to the same state and condition in which it existed prior to construction of said highway, and to bear the expense thereof. Should Grantee in such event fail, neglect or refuse to so remove said highway and restore said property. such removal and restoration may be performed by Railroad at the expense o:Grantee, which expense Grantee agrees to pay to Railroad upon demand. 10. This indenture shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 11. Section 12 on the Insert hereto attached is hereby made a part of this indenture. IN, WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate as of the day and year first herein written. CO m, , COST _ SOUTH RN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY g� ,fes By chairman-Board of SgpCwfvisors Title ATTST: J. R. OL Oil, CLERIC By � Attest Deputy Clerk -Board of Supervisors 00141 . .......... I I N S E R T North Frontage Road - Crossing EO-40.6 12. Subject to applicable reservations, terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, Railroad hereby grants to Grantee, the right to construct, reconstruct, maintain and use a sixty-six (66) inch reinforced concrete drain pipe in, upon, along, across and beneath the property of Railroad described in said Exhibit "A". Construction and maintenance of said drain pipe shall be in a good and workmanlike manner to the satisfaction of Railroad and at the sole cost and expense of Grantee. 001 i EXHIBIT "A" North Frontage Road - Crossing BO-40.6 That certain parcel of land situate in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: C OPUMENC ING at a point on the easterly line of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company's land (100 feet wide) , distant thereon N. 5017140" W. , 115.15 feet, N. 9030' 1$" Wl. , 72.06 feet, along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1482.36 feet, through an angle of 11044'4411, an arc length of 303.$8 feet, N. 21015'02" W. , 72.06 feet and N. 25027'40" VI. , 98.17 feet from the northeasterly corner of the 0.324 acre parcel of land described in the Joint Deed re- corded February 21, 1955, in Book 2480, at Page 326, Official Records of Cont-ra Costa County; thence from a tangent that bears S. 7601011$" W. , along a curve to the right, with a radius of 2042.00 feet, through an angle of 0051'03", an arc length of 30.32 feet to a point of reverse. curvature; thence along a tangent curve" to the left with a radius of 57.00 feet, through an angle of 96001'4211, an arc length of 95. 53 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 5054.00 feet, through an angle of 0025' 51", an arc length of 38.00 feet to the westerly line of said Company's land; thence along said westerly line N. 21004' 12t1 W. , 124.73 feet and N. 250271401, W. , 73.34 feet; thence from a tangent that bears N. 79044143" E. , along 'a curve to the left with a radius of 1951.00 feet, through an angle of 300112211, an arc length of 102.93 feet to the easterly line of said Company' s land; thence along said easterly line S. 25027'40" E. , 930 feet to the point of commencement. CONTAINING 0.247 of an acre, more or less. The bearings and distances used in the above description are on the California Coordinate System, Zone 3. 111ultiply the above distances by 1.0000753 to obtain ground level distances. EXHIBIT "A" 0143 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 In the Matter of Authorizing Publication of a Notice of Opportunity for a Public Hearing on the Proposed Northgate Road Reconstruction, Walnut Creek Area, Project No. 4461-4561-72. On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to publish a notice of Opportunity for a Public Hearing on the proposed Northgate Road Reconstruction project (consisting of replacing the existing narrow bridge over Pine Creek near Oak Grove Road on an improved alignment) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc. Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ` Deputy Clerk Mildrmed U. Ballard H 24 5/74 -12,500 fU'�� 4 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Accepting as Complete Construc- tion of Improvements to gay Avenue and Approving Deferred Improvement Agreement, Minor Subdivision 115-711, Oakley Area. The Public Works Director having reported that construction- of improvements to gay Avenue, Oakley area, adjacent to Minor Sub- division 45-74 has been satisfactorily completed; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid work is ACCEPTED as complete; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the bonding require- ments are waived inasmuch as Kay Avenue is not a County maintained road; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that a Deferred Improve- ment Agreement with N. A. Lindsay and Helen Lindsay providing for street; and drainage improvements for an unnamed north-south road adjacent to Minor Subdivision 45-74, is APPROVED, and Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute some on behalf of the County. The foregoing order Was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Recorder ( via P.W.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 21 s day of January , 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By LYin &_?L Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Sancy S1 Ortega 61 00145 A _ "DEFERRED IMPROVEMENT AGREE.1ENT" (Project: Minor Subdivision 45-74 1. PARTIES. Effective on the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as "County" and N. A. LINDSAY and HELEN LINDSAY, his wife, as joint tenants, _ hereinafter referred to as "Owner" mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. PURPOSE. Owner desires to develop the property he o::ns as described in Exhibit "Al- attached hereto and tushes to defer construction of permanent improvements, and County agrees to such deferment if Owner constructs improvements *as herein promised. 3. AGREENIEW BINDING O`: SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. This agreement is an instrument affecting the title or possession of the real property described in Exhibit "A". All the terms, covenants and conditions herein imposed shall be bindinc upon and inure to the benefit of the successors i.: in=terest of Ownzr. Upon the sale or division o- the pr::pe_ty described in Exhibit "A" thc: ter=ms of this a-reement shall apply separately to each parcel, and the owner of each parcel shall succeed to the obligations imposed on Owner by this agreement. Upon annexation to any City, Owner shall fulfill all the terms of. this agree— ment upon demand by such city as though Owner had contracted with such city originally. - Any annexing city shall have all the rights of a third party beneficiary. 4. STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVE`•IENTS. A. The improvements set forth in this section may be deferred by owner and shall be constructed when required in the manner set forth in this agreement. The deferred improvements required by County Department of Public Works are generally descri'-ed on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. B. When the County Public Works Director determines that there is no further reason to defer construction of the improvements, he shall notify Owner in writing to commence their installation and constructio17. The notice shall be mailed to the current owner or ot:ners of the land as shown on the latest adopted County Assessment roll. The notice shall describe the work to be done by owners, the time within which the work shall commience and the tire within .hich the work shall be completed. All or ary portion of said improvements may be required at a specified time. Each o:.ner shall participate on a pro rata basis in the cost of the improvements to be installed. If owner is obligated to pay a pro rata share of a cost of a facility provided by others the notice shall include the •amount to be paid and the time when payment must be made. 5. PERFOF:,MICE OF THE 1,.ORK. Owner shall perform the work and r.Iake the payments required by County as set forth herein or as modified by the Board of Supervisors. Owner shall cause plans and specifications for the improvements to be prepared by competent person: legally qualified to do the work and to submit said improvement plans and specifications for approval prior to commencement of the work described in the notice and to pay County inspection fees. The work shall be done in accordance with County standards in effect at the time improvement plans are submitted for approval. Owner agrees to commence and complete the work within the time specified in the notice given by the Director of Public Works and to notify the Count-,• at least 48 hours prior to start of vork. In the event Di=ner frails to construct on)' 1..^.:provements rcquired unclor this agree.meIht, Cou.—ty may, at its option, do the work and collect all the costs fro=m 0-"wort If Count• sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Owner shall hay all rem:sonahle attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigatic. incurred by County in connection therewith. 10ermission to enter onto the property of Owner is granted to County or its contractor as may be necessary to construct such improvements. '146 6. JOINT COOPERATIVE PLAY. Owner agrees to cooperate upon notice by County with other property owners, the County, and other public agencies to provide the improve- ments set forth herein under a joint cooperative -plan including the formation of a local improvement district, if this method is feasible to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. 7. REVIEL OF REQUIREMENTS. If Owner disagrees with the requirements set forth in any notice to commence installation of improvements he shall, within 30 days of the date the notice was mailed, request a review of the requirements by the Board of Supervisors of County. The decision of this Board shall be binding upon both County and 01,lner. 8. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMEWS. County agrees to accept those improvements specified in Exhibit "B" which are constructed and completed in accordance with County standards and requirements and are installed within rights-of-u ay or easements dedicated and accepted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Owner agrees to provide any necessary temporary drainage facilities, access road or other required improvements, to assume responsibility for the proper functioning . tliereof, to submit plans to the appropriate County agency for review, if required, and to maintain said improvements and facilities in a manner which will preclude any hazard to life or health or damage to adjoining property. 9. BONDS. Prior to approval of improvement plans by the County, Owner may be required to execute and deliver to the County a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond in an amount and form acceptable to County to be released by the Board of Supervisors in .hole or in part upon completion of the work required and payment of all persons furnishing labor and materials in the performance of the work. 10. INSUPLANCE. Owner shall maintain, or shall require any contractor engaged to perform the work to zhaintain, at all times duri :g the performance of the ii-ort called for herein, a separate policy of insurance in a form and amount acceptable to County. 11. INDEAiNITY. The Owner shall assume the defense and indemnify and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees, from every expense, liability or payment by reason of injury (including death) to persons .or damage to property suffered through any act or omission, including passive negligence or act of negligence, or both, of the Developer, his employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, or arising in any way from the work called for by this agreement, on any part of the premises, including those matters arising out of the deferment of permanent drainage facilities or,the adequacy, safety, use or nonuse of 0014'7 - 2 - . temporary drainage facilities, the performance or nonperformance of the work. This provision shall not be deemed to require the Oaner to indemnify the County against the liability for damage arising fron' the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the County or its agents, servants or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the County. State of California ) ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County of �, rn C p�,�ot- ) or Individual) On�Ce. �� the persons) whose names)—�/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed 1t. _'":::'••• '!":'L'l:a:i!!Si:"i::L•:•.::!1;lll:flilitil + - y= � JUDY LICHTER-dAN a _ NOTARY PUBLIC Contra Costa County, Caliro.ni,a (NOT-A- Ny comaission expires Oct.3,1978 l1IIIIiIli1W;1!111111ll111111111117UU1:1I11IIIHIH L,c-HIc:Rigfl � Notary Public for said County and State COt:i3TY of 0\'T COSTA OWNER o- ` ggess - J - L-,Chairman, Board of S ors• �I.' Lind ay -�• i ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk L,', & ex officio Clerk of the Board len Lin say By Cy I && eputy RE1- NDEEED FOR APPRO' ` y NOTE: This document is to be acknowledged Public Works Director with signatures as they appear on deed of title. FOM APPROVED: MIN B. CLAUSEN County Counsel BY Deputy 00148 LD-S1 (3/74) - - 3 - Minor Subdivision 45-74 EXHIBIT "A" A portion of the Northeast one-quarter of Section 35, Township 2 North, Range 2 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Parcel "D" as said parcel is shown and so designated on that certain Parcel Map recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Contra Costa County on November 8, 1973, in Book 31 of Parcel Maps, at page 2; thence from said goint of beginning along the westerly line of said Parcel "D", North 00 21' 05 East 330.00 feet to a 5/811 rebar tagged "L.S. 3251" marking the Northwest corner of said Parcel "D"; thence along the northerly line of said Parcel "D" South 890 5S' 47" East 167 feet more or less; thence leaving said northerly line South 000 23' 20" nest 330 feet more or less to a point in the southerly line of said Parcel "D"; thence along said southerly line North 890 55" 47" West 167 feet more or less to the point of beginning containing 0.95 acres net more or less. vv149 Minor Subdivision 45-74. - EXHIBIT "Bn I. Improvements required by Contra Costa County Public Works Department along the frontage of Parcel "C" as described in Exhibit "A". 1. Approximately 4,800 square feet of street paving of 18-foot half- width agricultural roadway adjacent to the east property line of Parcel "C" as described in Exhibit "A". 2. Necessary longitudinal drainage. 3. Temporary conforms for paving and drainage as may be necessary at the time of construction. Ii. Relocation of Utilities Any necessary relocation of utility facilities shall be the responsi- bility of the owner or his agent. The construction of the above deferred improvements shall begin as outlined in Item 4B of the Agreement when any of the following occur: 1. The road is constructed to its ultimate planned width of the County or by an Assessment District. 2. Frontage improvements are constructed adjacent the subject property. 00150 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OP CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for Inlet Grate Modification, ) January 21, 1975 Countywide. ) (Work Order 4944) ) ) Bidder Total Amount Chas. I. Cunningham Co. $9,959.25 tabacxhx Cx�6 P. 0. Box 425 � t�oux�ies!!fx Oakdale, California 95361 George Bianchi Construction Company, San Jose Metal Specialties Company, San Leandro Jack Parker, Incline Village Albay Construction Company, Martinez Eugene G. Alves Construction, Pittsburg Von Raesfeld Engineering Construction, Petaluma McGuire and Hester, Oakland The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concu-ring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract tt :refor. _ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the Ccunty Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract foi, this Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon s:_gnature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. CERTIFIED COPY • C^'!!f_ t`.:at. Curfl•(!C copy OT:... the nrfFina{ dna ontent %hb•h ! on file in my offiep, and that it was Pa49r•ri .K- "dopte-d by the Dnnrd of Guperv!sor4 of tbntrn 1'11,11t Omnty. Vallfornla. nn cc: Public Works Director the NIMP 0hmen. ATTb::T: .1. It. ot.-.,, SON. CnUntY County Counsel Clerk A. ez•ofliHO Clerk of malll lloard of$upervinorlt, by Deputy Clerk. C011llty Auditor yy ,Q Contractor l/.fal�� on Jan. 21,, U0151' . IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA January 21 9i 5- Inn the Matter of Approving ) and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition ) On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement an3 contract a and the same are hereby APPROVED and the County Auditor is authorized to—draw warrant_ in the followinE amount to be delivered to the County Right-of-Way Agent: _ Contract Payee and Road Name Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount HILLCREST Vernon Rouner, January 7, 1975 Grantors $100 AVENUE at al Project No. 7564-4106-73 Antioch area (840 square feet of land required for the project) The County Clerk is directed to accept deed from above-named grantors for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES : None. ABSEr7T: None. I HERrFBY CERTIFY that the- foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January , 19m- cc: 9 -cc: Auditor Public Works (2) J. R.. OLSSON, CLERK Administrator By iwfia 5vurtega, putt' Clerk Form #20.4 70-1-500 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA January 21 1975 In the Matter of Releasing ) Subdivision Deposit ) Subdivision: 1233, Pleasant Hill ) Area. ) Deposit: $500 ) Auditor's Permit No. 99219 ) Dated May 12, 1972- Refund 972Refund to: Morgan Development, Inc. ) 2540 North Main Street ) Walnut Creek, California ) 94596 On October 23, 1974 this Board resolved that .the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been main- tained (for one year after completion and acceptance) against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies (if any) developing during this period have been corrected; and . Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 8429(b) and the Sub- division Agreement, the Director is authorized to refund the deposit as indicated above. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21 at day of January-, 197 5 J. R. OLSSON, CLERK cc: Public Works (2) Subdivider By Nancy Ortega u , Deputy Clerk OQ153 0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 ' 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Deed for County Purposes (Juvenile Hall Property) , Martinez Area. The"State of California, Department of Transportation, having delivered to Contra Costa County for acceptance its Director's Deed No. DP-03163A-01 -01 , dated April 23, 1974, for a small parcel of surplus State land at the southeasterly inter- section of the South Frontage Road to State Highway Route 4 and Glacier Drive as recently relocated in said State highway con- struction; and The Public Works Director having recommended that said deed be accepted for addition to the adjacent County-owned property; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid deed is ACCEPTED, and this Board directs the Clerk to certify to said acceptance on said deed for recording. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c e: Recorder ( via R/P) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Qcmty Administrator affixed this 21 S day of January , 197 -f-J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Gvrc , , . 1 Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Nancy S. Ortega In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 In the Matter of Approval of Work Order 4143, Oak Road Extension, Pleasant Hill Area, Project No. 4052-4143-74. The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board approve Work Order 4143 and that he be authorized to arrange for the California Department of Transportation to review the plans and specifications for the proposed Oak Road Extension project at an estimated cost of $3,000; and The Public Works Director having advised that State review of the plans and specifications is required because the project is being funded under the Federal-Aid Urban Program; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes or said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors County Auditor-Controller mixed this 21st da of January , 19 q5 County Administrator y — J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By� 1 , Deputy Clerk Mildred S ar H 24 5/74 -12,500 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19-7 5 In the Matter of Parks and Open Space Program, l - County Service Area R-8, Walnut Creek Area. The Board on September 17, 1974 having approved an agree- ment with the City of Walnut Creek which would provide for the acquisition, construction and completion for local park and recre- ational facilities for County Service Area R-8; and On the recommendation of the Public Works Director, and in accordance with provisions of the aforesaid agreement, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the proposal of the City of Walnut Creek to proceed with negotiations for its purchase of the Cortese Land Company property, containing approximately 137 acres, is APPROVED, the City's cost to be financed from the proceeds of the sale of the $6,750,000 1974 Park and Open Space Bonds previously authorized for County Service Area R-8. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: ?lone. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: City of Walnut Creek witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of (via P.W. ) Supervisors 21st Public Works Director affixed this day of January - �9 ?5 Director of Planning J. R. OLSJON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller B � � � Deputy Clerk County Counsel y *ed- -flaxia�s�= p H 24 5/74 Cqi.;p�ty Administrator ONN 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975- In 975In the Matter of Status Report on North Richmond Bypass Project, North Richmond Area. (Project No. 0572-4345-72) . The Board on January 14, 1975 having requested the Public Works Director to report on the status of the construction project for North Richmond Bypass, Richmond area; and The Public Works Director this day having reported with respect to the estimated cost of the project and acquisitions of rights of ways, and advised that the project is included in the County's Major Projects Program which was approved by the Board in August, 1974; that the tentative date for funding of the County's portion of the project per the Major Projects Program is Fiscal Year 1977-1978 and Fiscal Year 1978-1979, which would probably indicate construction beginning in 1978 or 1979; and that should other funds become available, such as Community Development Funds, it may be possible to advertise the project at an earlier date; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid report is ACKNOWLEDGED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard H 24 5/74 -12.500 0001 CONTPLA COSTA COUtiTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEWL Martinez, California January 21, 1975 AGENDA REPORTS Report A. NORTH RICHitOND BYPASS - STATUS REPORT - North Richmond Area The Board of Supervisors, through its Order of January 14, 1975, requested a report on the status of the North Richmond Bypass project. The proposed North Ai.chmond Bypass project consists of •a new four-lane divided highway extending from the Richmond City Limits at Gertrude Avenue northerly to Parr Boulevard.- and oulevard;and theca along Parr Boulevard to Goodrick Avenue. The new road will continue southerly of Gertrude Avenue to Castro Street in the City of Richmond as a City project. It is understood that the City intends to proceed with construction of their portion of the project between Castro Street and Gertrude Avenue in 1975 or 1976 using, in part, $250,000 in County Aid-To-Cities funds ($112,000 presently allocated, $138,000 proposed for the Fiscal Year 75-76 budget) . The estimated costof the project based on current prices. . is $2,000,000, excluding rights of way ($1,600,000 for the ortion between Gertrude Avenue and Parr Boulevard and 400,000 for tine portion along Parr Boulevard) . Right of way acquisition by the County began in Fiscal Year 1971-72. All but one parcel needed for the portion of the project between Gertrude Avenue and Parr Boulevard Inas been acquired. It is anticipated that the rights of way for the r portion along Parr Boulevard will be provided through dedications of rights of way by adjoinio developments. The project is included in the County's Major Projects Program which was approved by the Board of Supervisors in August 1974. The tentative 'date for funding of the County's portion of the project per the 1:ajor Projects Program is Fiscal Year 77-78 and Fiscal. Year 78-79. This would probably indicate construction beginning in 1978 or 1979. Should other funds become available for this construction, such as Community Development Funds, it may be possible to advertise the project at an earlier date. (RE: 'Project No. 0572-4345-72) (RD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 10 January 21, 1975 �!► In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 Z.5- In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of Final Environmental Impact Report, Oak Road Extension (Las Juntas to Coggins Lane), Pleasant Hill Area, Project No. 4054-4143-74. The Public Works Director having reported that in compli- ance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 a draft Environmental Impact Report for the extension of Oak Road, from Las Juntas to Coggins Lane, was submitted to the Planning Department on November 11, 1974; and It having been noted that on December 17, 1974 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on said Environmental Impact Report and found the project to be in conformance with the County General Plan, as per Section 65402 of the Government Code, and that said Report was adequate; and The Final Environmental Impact Report this day having been filed with the Board for consideration; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Super- visor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the final Environmental Impact Report is hereby ACKNOWLEDGED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. P a _ •r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the-,, _ minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Lc,o� �l Deputy Clerk Mildred allarrd H 24 5/74 -12s00 00-tSzy - Lai PLANNING COMMIMON MtMatt11M ANTHONY A. DEHAESUSCONTRA COSTA COUNTY DIR[CTOR o//LANNINa ALBERT E. ANDERSON, MORALE PLANNING DEP�R.T�iENT ALBERT R.GOMPAGLIA, MARTINEZ - RICHARD D. HILDEBRAND.WALNUT CR_LC - RICHARD J.JEHA.EL SOfRA.MT9 WILLIAM L.MILANO. PITTSMURG COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. NORTH WING JACK STODDARD. RICHMOND P.O. BOX 931 ANDREW H.YOUNG.ALAMO 14ARTtBE2,CALIFORNIA 94553 PHONE 228-3000 December 26, 1974 _ CE'VED E CANo2/, 1975 J. IL OLUM SON EOAW O:pC A E CORS To Concerned Parties: This document is the Contra Costa County Planning Department re- sponse to verbal and written testimony taken before the County Planning Commission hearing on the Draft EIR for Oak Road Exten- sion, Las Juntas Way to Coggins Lane. The Final EIR ::ill consist of this doctaent and the Draft EIR. This project would construct a 1,270 foot asphalt paved roadway connecting Coggins Lane with Las Juntas Way.. This 60 foot wide roadway will consist of 40 feet of pavement, 4 and 1/2 feet of sidewalk and 15 and 1/2 feet of additional space to be -designated for use as bicycle lanes and disabled vehicle parking. . The pro- ject will require the acquisition of property from•the rear lot portions of eight parcels Fronting on Wayside Lane. It will also require the splitting of a presently vacant parcel fronting on Coggins Lane. The project could be built with federal and County funds totalling $655,000. I Sincerely, Anthony A. De aesus' Dilrector of/Planning AAD:hf W160. Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR for Oak Road Extension, Las Juntas Way to Coggins Lane, Contra Costa County, California Introduction With -the enactment of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and its subsequent guidelines, local agencies were given the responsibility for the preparation of EIR's (Environmental Impact Reports) for public projects. AB 899 further extended this responsibility to private projects. In March of 1973, the County of Contra Costa adopted gui4elines for the "Processing Procedures of Environmental Impact Reports and Public Projects." In accordance with these guidelines an EIR was prepared for the project to extend Oak Road from the Pleasant Hili BART Station to Coggins Lane and a notice of completion was posted on November 18, 1974. This EIR was cir- culated to agencies and the public. A hearing on the EIR and the project's conformance with the County General Plan was held before the Planning Com- mission on• December 17, 1974. As a result of these puolic hearings, verbal testimony and written comments were received pertaining to the contents of the Draft EIR, thus requiring a Final EIR, which is described as follo:,s by the adopted Cotmty guidelines. Final EIR means an EIR containing the information specified in the draft EIR plus a section for cozaents received in the consultation process, and the response of the Responsible_ Agency to the co= nts " received. The policy of the County has been to handle these responses in one of twd manners. The Draft EIR Pay be revised to incorporate such co::mlerts and the lead agency responses (Contra Costa County) or the responses gay be added to the Draft EIR. Because of the length and complexity of t.-Le Draft EIR the Planning Department Staff has chosen the second method. The Draft EIR was prepared by Environmental Impact Planning Corporation for Contra Costa County. The following responses were prepared by the Planning Department. .The following material is divided into two sections. The first consists of communications received during the review period. The second contains this agency's response to written and verbal communications. WILD t ,, � X11f� lit, [IV/ C� . 1 • :rad JOHN SLI rTER �4 ATTORNEY AT LAW CCNI'RSL BUILDING. SUIT[ 1205 14tH ST. PND DaoaOWAY OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA 94612 �:��a i�; {�?��:� (!�t•11�;r�tIL1�1 • 763-1960 September 13, 1974 L. J. Reagan Assistant Public ldor;:s Director-Road Design Contra Costa County Public llorks Department 6th Floor, Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Re: Design Project No. 4054-4143-74 ' Oak Road Extension by Property: 3120 •.•Tayside Lane Dear Mr. Reagan: I have your letter of September 3, 1974. I will not be able to attend the meeting but I would like to explain -my position with respect to this project: 1. I am opposed to the project as -presently designed because it will be very detrimental to my property. It will - greatly reduce the land value, leaning an essentially un- buildable site. It will also greatly r+ duce the residential amenity, although the house itself will not be ttiken, because the roadway will remove most of tree back yard and will introduce much traffic noise in a now quiet neighborhood. In the event that the house is destroyed by fire or other disaster, the site would probably be too small to allow reconstruction under zoning regulations_ 2. I am opposed to the proposed location of the route because a preferable non-disruptive route is available: the railroad right of way. idose, of the right- of way is unused and is certainly broad enough to accommodate this road. Apparently the county has simply abandoned this alternative because• of the red tape involved in making use of railroad property. 3. Lt i_11e County insists on proceeding :with the route as plann-cd I would ei:lphatically request that some, arrangement be worked out so that: I could trade the land that you take from me with land of approximately equivalent- square foot-age contiguous to nie. Perhaps one of the contiguous property owners would prefer to have the county take all. or bis property so that such , an arrangement could be worked out- I would also request that OU1�2 i L. J. Reagan Septem.?er 13, 1974 ' Page -2- access be permitted from the new street. Please advise as to %..hether the County will consider the objections set forth in this letter. If- you are determined to go ahead with the project as planned, please advise as to (a) when you expect to begin acquiring right of way, and (b) when you expect to begin construction. Please also advise as to the projected -ultimate traffic volume on the new street and in what year it is anticipated that projected volume will be reached and what your studies indicate would be the projected noise levels at my property when this traffic volume is reached. If you have prepared an environmental impact report, please send me a copy or a copy of the negative declaration-. Yours very truly; John Sutter- , JS:j es r _ 00163 -. - 3 JOHN SUTTER I J 1.: .. _ - ATTORNEY AT LAW CCNTRAL WILDING. SVITC 1203 _ •'''••t 11� • 1AT.1 ST. )r 3 EMOAM-AV '• ': 'I ' CiC i 7 19'14r .�..- 1• OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA 04612 PUBLIC 1`�t?R!w DEPARTME"IT ! 7G3•=9G0 ;�' I•.��:'`• ,..s October 4, 1974 Vernon L_ Cline -. ; Chief Deputy :Cublic '.7orks Director COL1Ilt-y of Contra Costa oth floor, Administration Building I4artinez, California 94553 ='t=~`•' ' Re: fly Property_ X120 Wayside' Lane Your llesi�;n - Oak Road h:�teusion 4052-4143-74 :•L Dear Fir. Cline: Thank you for your letter of September -11 , 1974, and enclosures. = After read-inS the Lnvironmental Impact f:eport, I :':ould like to add an a0ditional point. Iii the event that ' is the Oak bond E-1:tension is built, I strongly urge tat - ` s a noise barrier, sticli as the five fool; acoustically opzque barrier referred to oil Tnae 17 of the Ileport, • . be built along tiie westerly edge of the road. ` A.7 the Report sho!'-Is (page 1?) at the paint nearest M y property, bet-..een now and 1"'.0 _;nd because of this rorld noise levels would increase from 55 to o6- at - the x'10 ren sureiacnt. and from jl7 to 67 b,-, the 15n ineasure-ment;. ince the decibel scales are loCarythmic , this amounis to :;lore titan dou[ liu t;%te present raise level_ =ince noise ::ill increase <;nyt-.ay because of the increase in the nu-Aber of• Z;.uZT trains and the General increatse in population in the area , it is certainly unf,,ir to burden the ` .--1 •side properties -tlith this furt'aer and unnecessar-, noise increesQ. Your study shoals that the const,:uct,ion of the barrier ..j "::ould very :;it;.: ;ly reduce the level of traffic noise at the tdoyside properties. In addition, I t ould urs-e the i.;rucl: and bu,, traffic be arohibited on 0ak r.:�tenoion bcc:suUc .:ludic:; sno•,: Vernon L. Cline Page Ttivo October 4, 1974 that each truce: or bus produces ai)out four timess much noise as the average automobile: Very truly �youV s, JOIL j J, dw 00165 Oty oll'Concord CITY COUNCIL Richard L. Holmes.Mayor PLANN 1 NG DEPARTMENT Laurence B. Az"edo William H. Dimon Daniel C. Heli. Richard T. Lo Pointe November 26, 1974 Farrel-A Sit-art. Cay Ocnage► Mr. James W.Cutler n `� Planner 1I1 zo ' - rn Contra Costa County - Planning Department o �t Post Office Box 951 Martinez, Ca. 94553 <� �C- �L . Dear lair. Cutler: Re: Environmental Impact Report: Oak Road Extension Our staff has reviewed the Environmental lmoact Report for the Oak Road Exten- sion located just north of the Pleasant Hill SART Station on Treat Boulevard. This project is located in the county and will eventually be annexed to Pleasant Hill and/or Walnut Creek. Consequently, the road extension will have little effect upon Concord. Our main concern will be the future Oak Road extension to Monument Boulevard and what impact it would have upon Monument Boulevard and its environs. This project is contemplated for a future-date when needed, and 'has been included in the Circulation Element of the Concord General Plan. A secondary concern is the elimination of the unusually large California White Oak Tree at 3190 Tayside Lane. Our department would desire the reten- tion of this tree if there is a possibility of realigning Oak Road extension around the tree into the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. In conclusion, the City of Concord has little comment on the E. I.R. for Oak Road Extension except for the two comments above. Any further information about the project should be sent to our department for review. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Yours very truly.- H. ruly;H. Hirano Assistant Planning Director PHH/G.J:/mI b CONCORD CIVIC CENTER 1950 PARKSiDE CONCORD CALIFORNIA 94-519 TELEPHONE 682-6600 FG PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' E{^ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEC 5'' 11' 1e AR 74 DATE: December 4, 1974 PLZA GZ�i ..r.-;,.-,4=kPthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning Attn: James W. Cutler FROM: T. E. Burlingame, Asst. Public Works Directof,-, Flood Control Planning SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for Oak Road Extension-Las Juntas Way to Coggins Lane, Contra Costa County, which was received on November 22, 1974 has been reviewed and this office has the following comments to make: 1. Under Geology and Soils on page 13, the actual runoff from the project is approximately 4 cubic feet per second. The 2 acre feet per year as stated .in the article is inconsequential for descriptive purposes as runoff only occurs during the rainy season or about 1/3 time of_ the year. 2. The second paragraph under Geology and Soils should be rewritten as follows: The proposed road is a portion of a 100+ acre watershed in the Pleasant Hili area generally bounded by Hookston Road on the North, Southern Pacific tracks on the East, Las Juntas Way on the South and Buskirk Avenue on the West. This area drains into an existing storm drain near Buskirk Avenue and Hookston Road, thence under Freeway 680, over the East Bay Municipal Utility District aqueduct lines and then Westerly in Monument Plaza to outlet into the. Grayson Creek system. This existing system beneath the Freeway is designed for 50 cubic feet per second capacity based on the zoning contemplated at that time. Under the proposed Pleasant Hill Bay Area Rapid Transit District Station Environs Plan the storm water runoff that could originate in this area would increase to approximately 150 cubic feet per second. This increase over-taxes . the existing state system and other drainage facilities within the-area. This drainage system has been overloaded several times during the past years causing temporary flooding at the intersection of Buskirk Avenue and Hookston Road. It is not feasible, both from an engineering and economic standpoint, to parallel or expand the existing state system according to the Flood Control District. Two alternates are being t:.ramined by the District and are available upon request. The present drainage system at the eastern end of Coggins Lane has been de- signed for 28 cubic feet per second and is adequate to accept storm -rater generated by the Oak Road extension. 00167 . Memo to Anthony A. Dehaesus -2- December 4, 1974 Revise the third paragraph as follows: Begin the third paragraph with your sentence, "The present Oak Road Extension Project would convert 3/4 of an acre from a present assumed runoff etc." The remainder of the paragraph is satisfactory. H14:b j 00100 = TRAL CONTRA COS'. BOARD OF DIRECTORS SANITARY DISTRICT G.A.HORMOTTE.AL. PARfiE L. 80\EYS TEELE,P:esldrnl General SLlnigrr—Chien Ent: meet DON L. ALLAN 1250 SPRINGBROOK ROAD E$-1MSr b_DAVIS MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 5266 Secrct=y CHARLES J.GIBBS RICHARD J.MITCHELL WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94536 TEL.935-6727 AREA CODE 315 GEORGE A.RUSTIGIAN December 5, 1974 Contra Costa County Planning Department P. O. Box 951 Environmental Impact Report: Martinez, CA 94553 Oak Road_Extension Coordinate Location 49C3 Attn: James W. Cutler Planner III Gentlemen: The EIR of Oak Road Extension, dated August 16, 1974, has been- reviewed by this office. The installation of the road itself will not: place an additional load on the existing sewer system. If the instal- lation of the road does result in denser development in the general area then the following is offered: "The additional sewage generated within this development will - together with other current and .future developments involving conversion of open land or densification of land uses in the general area - require improvement of the trunk sewer system and expansion of the sewage treatment facilities of this District and the attendant greater use of energy within our critical air basin_ Since sewer facility capacities cannot be expanded to provide for each development as it occurs, such expansions when constructed will necessarily provide excess capacity periodically and will have a growth inducing potential. Therefore, this development must be regarded as having a growth impact." very truly yours. CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT G: o1?s o t , r:, T- C7 GenerallMa ager-Chief En eer r = cs t"n C� QU.-s F <� M Recycled Paper oft ...�.«. CRAIG:114 0-u—Mls ck&ST r Sem � uuR LAscL&.JR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT STIMMI.& W9.4 1331 CONCORD AVENUE RITTI WATrUr POST OFFICE BOX 757. CONCORD. CA 94522 Jorr I. D.VITD.....r.. TELEPHONES 662-5950 OR 439-9169 DDUGLASWFLM..ea..R-... December 16, 1974 Mr. Anthony A. Dehaesus Contra Costa County Planning Department P.O. Bos 951 Martinez, CA 94553 v o � Subject: Oak: Road Extension E.I.R. a �. Dear Mr. Dehaesus: ? Z We have reviewed the subject report and offer the following comments: (1) Increased development in and beyond the immediate neignbor;ood brought about by the increased access and utilization of BART urill increase the demand for water. This de,.Pd can only be met by drwwing greater quantities of water from the District's source of water, the Sacramento River Delta. The total effect is a reduction in the net outfl%r of the Sacramento River. - (2) Development of the im,.ediate area near Coggins Land and the S.P. Railroad would require extension of the existing'water ;rain under Coggins. Proposed future pipelines should be considered in the ultimate design plan connecting Coggins Lane to Minert Road and Oak Road to Monument Boulevard. (3) Back:-up facilities (treatment, pumping and "storage) are required to accommodate any ne►; development. Treatment plant expansion would increase the demand for energy and chemicals. E>Mansion of pumping facilities would increase enerery demand and noise pollution. Con- struction of new resenroirs could possibly have aesthetic effects as reservoirs must be located on elevated, readily visible parcels of land. Aesthetic irpacts could be partially or totally mitigated by con- structing buried resenfoirs. Noise impacts of punps could be partially or totally mitigated by burying or enclosing puling stations. Very truly yours, f� Gordon F. Tornberg - Associate Engineer GFT:mp Treated Water Division File: 34.300• " 3300 N. MAIN STREET,PLEASANT HILL, CALIFORNIA 94523 PHONE!4151934-6050 - December 17, 1974 Z' fir. James W. Cutler, Planner III Contra Costa County Planning Dept. County A-r..inis.ration Sicg., North Wing ..-.f P. 0. Box °51 { �' Martinez, CA 9_4553 Dear Mr. Cutler: Thank you for the opportL-ni,y to comment on the cervironmental impact Report for the Oak Road e�._ension v.-i thin the Pleasant iii l l BAU station. area. Folle:-sire are the comments t:at 1 reel are important to the City since this area is %-A thin our sphere o; influence and :.^u l d appreciate these being incorporated in the final Environmental Impact Report. Pace 9, para;rap'r. ;: reference is to the potential rezoning in existing single family areas to a :limier density (multi-family) type or residential land use. As your kno r the City of Pleasant ;-sill has adopted a majority of the Plcasant ;;ill BAST station environments pian with the ex- ception of the area boLr:cec ty Las Juntas Gn tie south and Coggins lane on the north. The area r21erred to %-.ithin this block section is currently being restudied by the Pleasant ill Planninc Staff. to determine v.hether or not in fact hiSh rise resicsr.tial structuresJare •suitable for the area in question. It is therefore, I believe iltocical to assume that rezoning %-ill Lake place in the very near future. From the position of Pleasant M ll , it is clt;ared that prior to any rezonine Acti=vity taking place in the area, -proper 5eneral plan studies should be conducted and concluded which speakt0 Li;L 'SSJ2S of ,.rC_�rVlr._ the t^ •:r' :'p n� To(Rtl- lopment %-.-; thin this area, until such time remcvelopcent does take place. With respect to circulat:cn issue raised in the same paragraph, it is my un6arstaat2in- teat the City of'Walnut Crcek has determined that Oak.Park Eoulevard %.ou.d not he extcndec into the City of Walnut Creek to connect to either Davie or Flinert Road. This is perhaps one area that should be discussed c.-ith the City of .:alnt:t Cree,: to cetermine the accuracy of* the projection as it ti:as madc some years ago. Also quos t i o::ab T e at :his ;o-n t in t i r,•_ is t::_ Oak road =x tension to flonu.mCnt i;oulevard. Serious consideration .:ii1 be given to the long range rE . 00171 fir. James W. Cutler llece.;lper 17, 197 Pace 2 objectivity of this proposal by the City of Pleasant hill at such time as the land use and circulation elements for this area is re-evaluated in the course of the public hearing process. Page 19, Paragraph 5, Venetation: The City of Pleasant Hill has adopt- ed a heritage tree program anc our concern is with respect to the large oak trees within the Pleasant H711 BART station area. Substantial cooperation was solicited frcm uART in retaining many of the mzicr oak trees within the BART station park-inc lot and. it u;ould appear as thc:s_h the larce oak .tree at the end of the current Co;cins Lane nay be subjected to adverse impacts v.hich could possibly result in major damage or Bea-h to the tree itself. Perhaps at this point in tire a tree consultant should be brcught into the public haaring process to discuss the incrits of the potential construction as it relates to t::a tree ane also to formulate recc.-imiendations as to the most feasible to retain this t•rce ..ithin the project description. Thank you once again for the opportunity to Gr:, 'C tt on tha Env i ren- ncntal Impact :.`°.port for this project anc----Sin:,uI~".• Q-dditiUiiai questions or clari icatio,s be rsquiroc, please• •el free' to c tact r.:r_.; ;.ice at your con•:eh i once. Sin-ercly yours. Coz;nunity P1a;-:niircctvr J Pi t::I'ms r 001'72 STAFF RESPONSE Mr. Sutter's comments in letters of September' 13, and October 4 do not directly bear on the adequacy of the EIR, however, they are included because they raise questions about the conditions under which mitigation measures might be introduced. Public Works Department responses to Mr. Sutter's letters are attached,. Concerns for the protection of trees expressed in the comments received• from the City of Concord and the City of Pleasant Hill are valid though this subject is discussed within the EIR (page 19). It should be noted that Public Works Department designs have been altered to save the large California White Oak in the backyard of 3150 Wayside Lane (page 19 para- graph 4). If additional lanes are added to Oak Road at some future date, the tree would remain in the median divider strip. Measures are contem- plated to mitigate the impact of overlying pavement upon the tree's root system. A number of questions were raised about the document's accuracy in des- cribing future land use and zoning in the area of the proposed project. Pleasant Hill takes exception with the statment page 9•paragraph 3, "Zon- ing there for the most part has not yet changed, but it will probably be so in the near future." Pleasant Hill is correct in pointing out that rezoning in the project area is not imminent. - The Preliminary Plan, Plea- sant Hill BARTD Station and Environs is still in hearing before the Plan- ning ,Commission. When the issues pertaining to the project area are re- solved and a plan is adopted, a considerable period of time may lapse be- fore the character of area begins to change and property.rezonings consid- ered. The City is also correct in pointing out that there is still dis- agreement over the planned extensions of Coggins Lane.to Minert Road and Oak Road to Nionuument Boulevard. Central Contra Costa County Sanitary District notes that the proposed ex- tension itself will not place an additional load on the existing sewer system. Contra Costa County Water District and Central Contra Costa County Sani- tary District pointed out that additional facilities might be required as a result of the proposed extension and that these new facilities could be expected to have their own impacts. These comments are worthwhile addi- tions to the EIR if they are considered within the framework of planning for the larger region. As noted above, plans for the area have not been totally resolved. This agency acknowledges the comments made by Flood Control and concurs with that department's recommended word changes. -2- 001'73 . Mr. Albers, at the hearing on December 17, 1974, pointed out that the EIR incorrectly staled that construction of the project is expected to commence prior to December 31, 1974. (page 23 paragraph 3) A clarification of this point is desirable. The Public Works Department anticipates that acquisition contracts with property owners will be made in December 1974 or January 1975. Actual construction is expected to begin in May or June of 1975. -3- 00174 q September 24, 1974 Design - -Oak Road Extension 4052-4143-74 Mr. John Sutter Attorney at Law Central Building, Suite 1205 14th and Broadway Oakland, California 95612 Dear Mr. Sutter: This Is In response to your letter dated September 13, 1974, regarding the Oak Road Extension project. A copy of the _Environmentai Impact Report that was prepared for this project is enclosed. The EIR should answer most of your quGstlons regarding traffic, noise, -etc. Sectlo.n ` I is a _ . discussion of the project alternatives Including one that would . -involve using a portion of the railroad right of May'. We have studied the ale of using a portion of the railroad right of way for the proposed project. Due to operational and safety factors involving the use of railroad right of way, It Is our understanding that -:t the naxi.mun a 25 foot wide strip of land might be available for use as a- roadway. This of course, would require Southern Pacific and the California Public Utiiities Commiss.lon ' s approval . it would still be necessary to obtain at least 35 feat of right of way fron pr-operty owners along ;ayslde' - - Lane . The existing high voltage power lines and a buried petroleum pipeline on the westerly edge of the railroad right of Kay xould• have to be relocated as a project expense, should this alternate be chosen. in comparison with the -proposed alternate, the use of the railroad right of way for a portion of the roadway appears to be economically undesirable . However, we are still Investigating this possibility. 00170 - t - - F� '•''• Mr. John Sutter - 2 - Sept. 24, 1974 It is anticipated that acquisition contacts with property owners will be made about Decomber 1974 or January 1975. Regarding your question about trading property, we cannot at.this time determine our approach to right of way aquisltion unti-1 accurate appraisals of the parcels involved have been Trade. Also we antiei- pate that the access to the new roadway will be limited and that the ' properties will continue to gain access from Wayside Lane. . We expect construction to begin In tray or June of 1975, and It Is expected that the construction period should last approximately 4 months. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact this office at 228-3000, extension 2131 . Very truly yours, Victor 1:. Sauer Public storks Director By • Vernon L. Cline Chief Deputy- Public 'Works Director WRG: bI Enc. cc Supervisor Warren N. Boggess Arthur G. Will , County Adminlstrator G. Derana, Real Property Division - _ 00176 JFC .....: .ti ;.. G. 'L --P.. � i"4�" -'^+X"....• .......- a_,, ..S.F' - _ .:,F�y<.. - - ..._ ... .. ...... 1 ..Sr. c t ' R November <i , 1974 - Design Prof. 04052-4143-74 • Oak Road Extension Mr. John Sutter Central Building, Suite 1205 14th Street and Broadway Oakland, CA 94612 Dear Mr. Sutter: . Thank you for your letter of October 4 , 1974, expressing concern. over the potentlal noise increaso 'at your property on Wayside Lane when the -Oak Road Extension Project is completed . We agree with you that the anticipated traffic volume in 1980 would increase the noise level In -the area . However, neither the initial noise levels nor the projected 1930 noise levels wi11 exceed the current Federal standards*. Ccncering your suggestion about a _noise barrier we feel that construction now would be premature. We anticipate that the proposed 1 .2-lane road will need to be. widened to four lanes ' as the adjoining <_J property is developed . This would require relocation of the noise " barrier If one were installed for the proposed initial 2-lane project. For •these reasons, it is our opinion thit a noise barrier should not be included in the current project. Regarding your request to prohibit bus and truck traffic from Oak Road, the County cannot legally limit such traffic because the Vehicle Code does not give the County the same authority as cities in this Instance. It seems doubtful that trucks would be using this ' road since it only provides access to the BART station However, you may wish to discuss with the City of Pleasant Hill the possibility of limiting truck traffic on .CoggIns Lane. Very truly yours, Victor W. Sauer Public Works Director • By _ - V.^L. Cline Chief Deputy Public Works Director cc Supervisor Warren N. Boggess ' Arthur G. Will , County Administrator ' • - - - 00177 .• .V r JAN&// 19 J. R. OLSSON ARK 60A�C OF SUPWISM COSTA CO. _ ��;s7 ��,.^''L�':,re�, .•.«may ,�� .. �L':� *'r-;•1 •:3a-ice i,r. - r •-+ sr`-.a - LAS jTNTT-S 1'J'A TO G-DGGI S L 4NE LG_�1RA COST COUNItY, C AL!jw'J!',:s PROJECT i'l-U l-BER.- 1ti1-6522 (00I) CONFORIMS TU NEPA AND CEQA Ir 1 Environmental Impact Report - Pursuant to The California Environmental Quality Act. (Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact Pursuant to the National.Environmental Policy Act Oak Road Extension Contra Costa County, California Prepared For The County of Contra Costa, California By ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PLANNING CORPORATION SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. 00179 h c . SpG • ��. � „ ' . r - - TABLE OF CONTENTS i Pa— I. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 II. LOCAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3 A. PRESENT PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3 1. Topography 3 �!. Geology and Soils 3 3. Seismicity 3 4. Air Quality and Climate 4 5. Noise 5 6. Vegetation 7 7. Wildlife 8 8. Visual Setting 8 B. PRESENT SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT 8 1. Land Use 8 2.- Cultural and Archaeological Features 10 3. Community Services i0 a. Health and Safety 10 b. Transportation 11 c. Traffic ll C. --PRESENT ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT 11 III. DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS 13 A. PHYSICAL IMPACTS 13 1. Geology and Soils 13 2. Seismicity -14 r 3. Air Quality _ - 14 4. Noise 17 5. Vegetation 19 6. Wildlife 20 7. Visual Impacts 20 00181 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Oak Road extension would be a 1,270-foot long asphalt paved roadway connecting the end of Coggins Lane with Las Juntas Way in Central Contra Costa County_ This proposed 60-foot wide roadway would consist of 40 �eet of pavement, 4 1/2 feet of ' sidewalk and 15 1/2 feet of additional space. The project foundation would be 1 to 2 feet deep. Federal guidelines for a roadway of this type call for .40 feet of pavement which allows for parking of disabled vehicles. The 8-foot lane at either curb would be designated as bicycle lanes and emergency parking would occur there. No landscaping is planned. Its principal purpose would be to ease 60' Raw 5.5 40' PAVEMENT 5.5 4.5 8' , 12 12' 8CUT SWK. ISHOULDER LANE LANE SHOULDER Z� CURS�� TQ 8E DETEMMINED �_ CURB FILL _ TYPICAL SECTION 1":F 10, 0x182 Wi��t-lu KQU►'�U� t L ? � = 2A122°3'11' C 8 • x•;r'..+ : ?' T.• : :t;� :�'t' iI I t.I. �• �-,�., .r.1l�xlk;s.vlt � .• . ' - ,?- �.:�'• ,= • 1 i „•.�1 �r..,F w•J.: .ta! - �. [ i` a r( ��„ - ..t'<"w r✓• .� Nth \:::t•1.S - M NJIYitFW 4•••.f0.. _ • �•..' „'.t•,/ � '.•. .Ir. 1�.1r2 UAk T�rK:ft'n ' �.p�+.�+. c�� 4'1 -:� �:. l •* Cos Bancro tolar£}J Lo 4. ��• .�. t :.i t t f r f11? _r„r,..'.... l/:{ � ..LY.t�}I,�,� l i / -<.r`_+.r • ., ••L•:�;,_ .,,..000..•� f9 • �••`•Aa!rl" • ='r'` - •"`:`S p 'r' ;k � - /• �,:}� y 40 r .�� ''*'� ••sem ,� �• ;:••.�`••� A IS Filtrataoa Plant .4• J,Str:Yj f 1117 y~ !` t 'mow j 1�i11 f :•:..._ ,t. '_`,�� •/ •: R r =V CV li'..Lr •� I-ryt• i' r�-= �.�`'�i}''F J,�( ! Zw• • °+ /•t `i• .�> �.', -1`'•-.+.. _ iCt _1.. �.. 1 i tI1)Itt'i..% t "'l: •r�r .r G - - •�=a,,.,,._.. mac: .i_ Ifr•: 0. F `� }} `� •\.••w'�,w.•=�r.� ;!a t1 "i`i'i p , y 4.:j )l'1J�j� _moi'_ •+t*•'�I h' F rat. t } '� 1 '� 1 .+ • •.`».. :' 4 . r •�J Z!. -`\, tI_ ',1\ ^^1\ •.yr Ste-• S .! �'•a.,.i` -t 1`itti ff••IturnA• , ri1. y J � .J,..�-:{. •� i�•` tJ ,`, a;: "'"�•.- ; •+ r• _ i ;•1 �/' L. _ \ % V"I CchY;,•j*• .Yr r 3 _� ..�� t"�� "W I.'!1 >'� 1'U .• \_ ♦`'�„'.!!�'�a. •';•,S :.• .. ^1 b' i X'• '4 a _ la�1i • ! .� ',-"'0.r `w 6)�•` i, + �. r. ,< 't;�y •4�•1 T t ~ 1 `L° '`71`�� `•`�.yes r t a` .�� l -� r• t '<►' � �?-'f• 139 .'.t -,� '-��{� r o� .� �V ��•'*•., b �� . �. \ "'`,♦ \:' \Y.• •` �r r � ti. 'Y t•t t ',� .r.r ♦ -.y �,,, ij-•`1,,, •w,w4 * ,\/1 .�, a1r �tll a /t.. S �! ?•tC � -- •�ill. x� ,r� •.y,h.�: ; 1 �� ` .��,- ,•\�-`yy. ` y^ � , � � -.^ l 'a 7� :a�.�v-,ttw.:.s t !! i t -`1.s(",r•,.,.f,:"�'•--.�` �a�' ��.f .� �: a ~' ' . `�- . .-�,t�,, t ., �� :a 2. J`• 4 as. may 7,,f.a-•'^t•'" '�"'_ry ,o� •> �:: �",'Z"';,•w` `' `\,; •� ,(48/t`t ; t i • , a•'•�.< D. .� .. -.. t,1Z�.-'Y�. ,C7 .w+r! � '.�.•r/ /;' '`:��,+ (•:•"'ti:. .: It; - -� r ..1. .tj'-,i..;,�� 2 _ •.J1�1�. //L� -6Q7,Y _ r- •."'-'.a :i _\. 'C •^t - ,} t }' �. - al• i,:' •� J •, ^ 1�� - _ 111 y s,Y l ^ `�µt); �� . r 1 t� 1'�� ,:x•`.�'`�.:- �.d• .1'S � 'l "` , `+t•• •! 1,- • t, 2 ,:A" 1 ,..rn.• :. �:s3t 4 -1' �!` 1 y 4S 1 `.,a ' ,� �:•;+T..�:' tYsr < =``\.�-. \ ! ^•=. .. •14,• . . .,.- -- to j ._ , a� \� <'`"L'�. �tct:CC �., �.'"'�.f'`�•"air.l V�D. : +%� •`'. '� •✓'Jlr l+i• .� `•1t .. - Ys tL` ' - `l! t _ •a '•r\.••-1 `!�'� -+ a ••�.'.: .._ ' )'� • ,`,` 't •• 1. +, _ ar,•= �;a2- -• 'C 11'l` Jy �•- �S ji�,.+�` `.` � x••"'I` .vt itf.J H ••"'•i' t' ,\ . '.G'f. •� 'a •t�.:J,ae'l a:. " .. i`p•17 It ''1-'. il•.•• •t." • r rU C \S. :"'"'•='. ,.' ,�=,_i w•• +.:�-r7• .i. t� ..Q •x \•�.. t"-i. 'YtA C M R >, TOPOGRAPHiCAL MAP r: , Alum Bim, i traffic loads related to operation of the nearby BART transit station. The congestion to be allevi- ated is expected principally on Las Juntas Way, Treat Boulevard and Buskirk Avenue. The right-of- way for the project would lie adjacent to that of Southern Pacific Railway. It would shorten the backyards of eight homes and would cross an empty , lot diagonally. These homes occupy land which, due to its increasing value, appears headed toward .-redevelopment into higher dwelling density. The project would be built with federal and county funds. It is estimated to cost $685,000. The proposed preliminary plan, Pleasant Hill BARTD Station Environs (1971) assembled by the Planning Department of Contra Costa County calls for a future expansion of Oak Road to four traffic lanes. Also called for is replacement of the curve at the northern end of the present project with a 'T' type intersection and connection of that intersection to Monument Boulevard. These future proposals, howeve_, are not part of the present project. 2 0l184 1 Coutes C7c= GOM C ry-• GP`t't�. LU 'LL VA y, to � t i _ -L•-l /. p� r y, . t 1 �c�� _ �,t � �• • �a ; 4_ I � ��' Iry .Y' r 6' Q' - END o : PROJECT ii 'a. ... � �Y a�. yr y %t*'.fid/ • �, _• `� : Ju !33 �• 4 41 BEGIN k f LAS ni iur,T .aY \�f,�• •� PI��CJ1r.0 •$Ay� �� t •t��y. -- al 'D RANSIT • ,1 t 41 �PL£As&mT HILL STATION f �' d TREAT pr,Yp �j s F;OJFIGT meq,,, pARY •� OAK 43A" .� �- .' flfl�.fl...� Lur—OM IIA PLM • 18a i II. LOCAL AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS A. PRESENT PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Topography Surrounding the site is the relatively flat floodplain of the Walnut Creek. The- site slopes imperceptibly down to the north. Elevation is 85 feet of mean sea level. The only relief in the vicinity of the site is provided by drainage canals and stream courses. No stream courses cross the site. 2. Geology and Soils The site is composed of fine-grained, clay-rich soils resting on top of deep s;.rcam alluvium deposit-ed by the action of Walnut Creek. This material is derived ---from the slopes of Mt. Diablo and the hills to the _. south and west. 3. Seismicity The Oak Road extension site is in a seismically active area, as is most of coastal California. The site is located near one of the most active fault systems in the Bay area, - the Sunol-Calaveras. This fault system lies less than two miles to the west. The California Division of bines and Geologyl lists one major earth ' quake during the last 150 years on this fault system. Kalifornia Division of Mines and Geology, Crustal Movement Investigations in California: Their History, Dates and Significance, Special Publication No. 37, _•1972; P- 2. 3 00185 It occurred in 1861 and involved ground breakage. No estimate of its magnitude is available-1 The California Department of Water Resources has pub- lished a compilation of California earthquakes of magnitude 4.0 or greater, occurring between 1934 and 1961. This data is useful as an indication of the seismic activity in the area. It includes the following earthquake epicenters within a five-mile radius of the site.2 Location Date Magnitude Concord October 1955 5.4 Concord May 1958 . 4.1 Local geologic naps and field examination show no evi- dence of major faults passing through .the site. 4. Climate and Air Qualitv - Pleasant Hill is located in the Diablo Valley and has a climate typical of sheltered inland locations in California. Summer days are hot, with temperatures at - - - --times exceeding 100 degrees. Winters are mild and wet. Daytime temperatures in winter are generally comparable to other areas around the Bay; however, the sheltering effects of the mountains west of Pleasant Hill cause winter minimum temperatures to average 10 degrees colder than coastal stations. Sunshine is plentiful, especially in summer. The summer fog does not usually penetrate inL_o the Diablo Valley; however, cold, radia- tion fog is fairly common in winter. The pollution potential of Diablo Valley is very. high. . The surrounding mountains and elevated summertime _ lIbid. - 2California Department of Water Resources, Crustal Strain and Fault Movement Investigation, 1964. 4 00187 atmospheric inversion, typical of the Bay "Area, fre- .quently make a closed "box" of the valley, in which pollutants may quickly reach high levels during periods of low wind speed. Abundant sunshine and warm temperatures in summer are conducive to the formation of photochemical oxidant. In addition to local sources, such as automobile traffic, it is generally understood that pollutants can also reach the Diablo Valley by transport of contaminants from westward urban areas by the seabreeze.l Air quality data for the stations -nearest the site, Concord and Walnut Creek, are given in the table below. It can be seen that photochemical oxidant is the most prominent air pollution problem, and that the other pollutants seldom reach high levels. For purposes of comparison, similar data for both Oakland and San Francisco are also included. 5. Noise - Noise levels near the project site vary greatly with the time of day. The background level of noise from Highway 680 is generally low. Moderately high peaks of noise are caused by BART trains approaching and leaving the Pleasant Hill station and by light aircraft flyovers. At present, BART trains pass through the Pleasant Hill station roughly 160 times per day. By 1980 this figure is expected to rise to 48.0 times per day. Due to the extreme variability of environmental noise, levels of noise are normally described statistically. The noise environment is commonly described by the L10 - and L5Q levels, which represent the noise levels in A-weighted decibels (dBA) exceeded 10% and 50% of the _.--time, respectively. The L50 is the median noise level and is a measure of the average noise levels. The L10 is a measure of the "average peak" noise level and provides information on the severity of maximum noise -"levels. 1Bay Area Air Pollution Control District, Aviation Effect on Air Quality, February 1971, page IX-12. 5 00188 OCCURRENCES OF POLLUTANT CONCENTRlATION� EXCEEDING AIR QUALITY STAITDARDS, 1973 OXIDANT J • F M . A M J J A S . O N D Concord 0 0 0 2 3 11 9 7 8 8. 0 ~ 0 Walnut Creek 0 0 0 2 3 8 9 5 .0 1 0 0 San Francisco 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oakland 0 0 0 1 0- 6 1 0 2 2 0 . 0 CARBON MONOXIDE Concord 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Francisco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Oakland 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 . - 0. - 0 0 0 0 NITROGEN DIOXIDE . Concord 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 San Francisco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 Oakland 0 0 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 - 0 . 0 0 —SUSPENDED PARTICULATES - Concord 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 San Francisco 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 3 0 0, 1Standard for oxidant is 0.08 ppm (1 hour average) ; carbon monoxide 9 ppm (8 hour average) ; nitrogen dioxide 0.25 ppm 41 hour average) ; ' suspended particulates 100 g/m3 (24-hour average) . •Taken from BAAPCD Technical Services Division Contaminant and Weather Summary., 2Data not published yet for December 1973; data shown is for December 1972. Same source as above. 001&9 A field study has been conducted to measure ambient noise levels near the project site. Measurements were made at two sites. Site A was located at the . south end of the -project, near. the intersection of the railroad right-of-way and Las Juntas Road. Site B was located near the north end of the project, directly behind the residence at 3180 Wayside Lane. The measured noise values are given in the table below. Measurements were made using 120 five-second samples over a ten-minute period. These measurements were made in mid-morning, while both BART trains and light aircraft were active. Peak noise levels measured are also given. These are due to decelerating BART trains approaching the Pleasant Hill station. MEASURED NOISE LEVELS Parameter Site A Site B - L50 47 dBA 49 dBA L10 55 dBA 54 'dBA r � - Peak Noise Level (Arriving BART Train) 69 dBA 62 dBA Peak Noise Level (Departing BART Train) 64 dBA 58 dBAl 6. Vegetation The site contains some of -the original orchard trees which are English walnut grafted onto California walnut rootstock. In addition, there are some California walnuts-which have sprouted from the base of decadent grafted trees. Other trees on site are apple, plum, lHighway Research Board, National Cooperative High- way Research Program Report 117 (1971) . This guide employs one of two methods described in P.P.M. 90-2 for the calculation .of noise levels. 7 - OQ190 i peach, pear, white oak (Quercus robata) , knobcone pine, willow, pepper tree, quince, olive and-date palm. • The predominant ground cover is mustard, with a mix- ture of cultivated shrubs, forbs and grasses. 7. Wildlife Wildlife at the site is typical of •California suburban areas. It consists principally of birds, rodents and escaped household pets especially cats. The still abundant orchard trees and grassy undergrowth provide both food and habitat for these wildlife types. 8. Visual Setting The project site is level and is covered with grass and mustard under a scattered overstory of orchard trees, oaks and ornamental trees. Many of the trees- are flowering species. There are four very large Cali- fornia white oaks near the north end of the site. Low wooden fences and shrubs separate most of the lots. _ This vegetation screens moss of the detached, one-story houses on the crest from the railroad r ght-of-way to the east. The railroad tracks are lined on each side by a bare .earth strip which is used as an access road to the tracks and to the petroleum pipeline buried on the right-of-way. A row of tall wooden power pylon lines borders this right-of-way. The vegetation covered backyards provide an attractive rural setting for the houses along Wayside Lane and separates them from the railroad tracks. B. PRESENT SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT 1. Land Use The immediate surroundings of this project site are composed of single family residential homes. These are divided into two neighborhoods by the Southern Pacific Railway right-of-way which passes north and south-, along the eastern side of the proposed project site. The western neighborhood is limited by Interstate 680, 8 00191 • • a divided freeway. To the northwest of the project are two recently constructed restaurants, a gasoline station and a large furniture store. Between these and the project site are several apartment complexes. These have been moved-in or constructed on what were pre- viously walnut orchards. The three complexes occupy the only multiple-unit zoned property within the surrounding project area. The rest is currently zoned for single family residences of either 10,000 or 15,000 square feet per parcel. Two small parcels adjacent to the BARTD station are zoned for office use. The remainder of the surrounding area is composed principally of a series of single and some multi-family neighborhoods separated by circulation corridors, the railroad right-of-way, and the Walnut Creek channel. One primarily industrial area lies 1/2 mile to the north, and co,-,-nercial areas lie similar distances to the south, west and northwest. Up to 1945, much of the area was planted in orchards. Since that time the vast majority of the single-family residences have been built. Within the last 10 years, population pressures on the area have become intense enough to stimulate redevelopment of much of the area into higher density (multi-family) dwellings. The presence of BARTD has placed increased pressure for redevelopment upon the neighborhoods within walking and bicycling distance of the BARTD station. Zoning there for the most part has not yet been changed, but it will probably be so in the near future. Elements of the Preliminary Plan, Pleasant Hill BARTD Station and Environs (1971) call for increased vehicular circulation through these neighborhoods. Circulation presently is by way of nonarterial streets. The long. range plan calls for redesign of the interchange at Oak Park and Interstate 680 to allow increased flow onto Coggins Lane which would presently be connected to the 2-lane Oak Road. Ultimately Coggins would would- be extended across the Southern Pacific Railway right-of-way to Minert Road. Oak Road would be widened to four traffic lanes and extended to Monument Boulevard. 9 00192 At the same time, the plan calls for multi-family .. . very high density development in the neighborhood west of the project site and office development to the west and south of the BARTD station. Neighbor- hoods to the east of the project site would remain principally in single family residential development. The present EIR is concerned with the 1270'-foot long . Oak Road extension which connects Coggins Lane with Las Juntas Way (see project description) . 2. Cultural and Archaeological Features An- archaeological site reconnaissance was conducted for the" project site. Prior to the actual field work, maps and records showing the locations of all known archaeological sites were consulted at the Treganza Anthropology Museum. - No known archaeological sites were recorded within the right-of-way, or in the immediate area. The records also indicated that the area had never been subjected to an archaeologi•-,al reconnaissance. f The actual survey was carried out by the assistant curator of the A.E. Treganza Anthropology Museum, which " is operated by the San Francisco State University. As. much of the area as possible was inspected for surface remains of archaeological 'sites. Several backyards were not accessible for inspection. No visible or surface indications of archaeological remains were round within the survey area, nor does it seem likely that there are- remains in the portions of backyards not available for inspection. 3. Community Services a. Health and Safety The -project site is located in an unincorporated area and is under the jurisdiction of .the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District and the County Sheriff. The California State Highway Patrol has jurisdiction 10 . over matters concerning traffic flow. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Department would have jurisdiction over all other criminal matters at the site. Pleasant Hill Police would respond to calls made for Coggins Lane. The nearest fire station is in the 2000 block of � Geary Boulevard, approximately 1 1/4 miles from the project. The County Sheriff's office is located in Martinez. Three elementary schools and one high school are lo- cated within a mile of the project site. These are Bancroft School, Oak Park. School, Fair Oaks School and Pleasant Hill High School. b. Transportation Local public transit consists of the BARTD system and private taxis. The nearest bus connection to Oakland is at Monument Road and Contra Costa Boulevard where Greyhound makes a stop on its Concord to Oakland n run. c. Traffic There is no actual traffic at the present time, because the road is not in existence. However, Coggins Lane at one end of the project site has moderately heavy traffic at lunch time when the two restaurants on the corner of Coggins and Buskirk are heavily patronized. Coggins Lane itself serves as an extension to the parking lot for these two restaurants when the lots become full. C. PRESENT ECONOMIC ENVIRON14ENT The new road will connect a BART station and parking lot to Buskirk avenue which leads to Freeway 680. Buskirk has two restaurants and- a gas station. Coggins Lane has multi-family housing. There are currently no commercial or industrial uses of the project site itself. . 00194 i The project site is in an unincorporated part of the County. The 1973-74 property tax rate in that area is $13. 063/$100 assessed valuation. _ r 12 00195 III. DIRECT AND INDIRECT IMPACTS A. PHYSICAL DIPACTS 1. Geology and Soils The principal geology and soils impact will result from 3000 cubic yards of excavation and subsequent paving of the fine-grained alluvial soil that now makes up back- yards along Wayside Lane. Disposal of excavated material is left to the excavation contractor. The relatively high quality of material at this site suggests that it would be sold to landscape nearby subdivisions. The site soil and the plants which grow on it at present serve to absorb the atmospheric precipitation that falls contributing to the photo- synthetic production of oxygen. When compared to Vie t area as a whole, the contribution to each of these is inconsequentially small. Runoff from the project would amount to close to two acre-feet per year. Roughly one-third of that amount runs off at the present time. Runoff from the site- would drain to Grayson Creek via an existing 50 second foot capacity culvert at the eastern end of Coggins Lane. The southern half of the roadway is outside the 100 acre watershed which naturally drains to this culvert. However, an exca- vated drainage ditch along the western side of Oak Road would divert runoff from that half of the project to the same culvert. The culvert was designed in 1964 to runoff standards for single family detached residences. As the area converts to higher density dwellings which have a greater runoff problem, this culvert will become over- loaded more frequently. According to the County Flood 13 _ 0019 Control Department, this drainage system has been over- loaded several times during the last five years. Overloading causes temporary flooding at the intersection - of Buskirk Avenue and Hookston Road. The present project would convert 3/4 of an acre from a present -assumed runoff factor of 0.3 to a runoff factor of 0.9. This is a three-fold increase. In addition, an increment of runoff would be added from outside the present watershed draining to the culvert. The total of these two items amounts to roughly 2 1/2 second-feet of increased capacity required to maintain the same level of drainage service as exists at present. As the impact upon dwelling density in the surrounding area resulting from the present project . would be insignificant in magnitude, the total increase in peak flows attributable to the project would amount to the 5% increase from Oak Road itself. 2. Seismicitv No significant impacts upon the seismic activity of the area are expected as a result of the ' implementa- tion of this project. 1h :.'pite of the seismic activity of the area and although the intensity.of - ground shaking during earthquakes is amplified in - alluvial areas such as the present site, the nature of a paved roadway without tall concrete structures is such that it is resistant to seismic damage and any damage which might occur would be relatively easy to repair. 3. Air Quality The air quality impact of the project would be due to emissions from automobiles on Oak Road. Both regional and local effects on air quality have been considered in this report. Regional effects have been measured in terms of the contribution of Oak Road emissions to the total emissions occurring in the Bay Area. Local effects have been estimated by a model of carbon mopoxide dispersion, under extremely adverse conditions. 14 00197 i I a. 'Regional Air Quality Effects The pollutant of greatest regional importance is photo- chemical oxidant. Oxides of nitrogen, and reactive - hydrocarbons are mainly of interest as precursor pollutants which are involved in the process which creates photochemical oxidant. Carbon monoxide is mainly a local problem near roads and freeways. Because sulfur dioxide and particulate matter generally come from sources other than automobiles, their produc- tion at the present project would be inconsequential. The process by which hydrocarbons and oxides of nitro- gen react with sunlight to form photochemical oxidant is not well understood. In addition, the photochemical reaction requires from one to several hours to occur. During this time, primary pollutants may have mixed and dispersed to such a point that their original source is unidentifiable. Because of these two- factors, the exact effect of a road's emissions on regional air quality is difficult to assess. Th.: most. common approach to estimating regional effects is to estimate the fraction of regional primary pollutants emitted by the project. The table below shows daily emissions from Oak Road for present, initial and 1980 traffic conditions using appropriate emission factors. Also shown.are regional daily emissions for the nine-county Bay Area Air :pollution Control District. The emissions from veh : cs using Oak Road represents an insignificantly sma-. _ fraction of total Bay Area emissions. In the regional context, the actual air quality impact of the present project is expected to be beneficial. This is because the modest stimulation of the BARTD system expected from the project should serve to reduce total automobile fuel use in the San Francisco Bay Area. Although the magnitude of this saving is not at present estimable with any reasonable degree of accuracy, it is expected to far outweigh both the tiny contribu- tion made by vehicles using Oak Road and the additional fuel consumed to carry the extra passengers on the BARTD system. _ OQ•1-� . OAK ROAD AND REGIONAL DAILY EMISSIONS (pounds) Pollutant Oak Road Bay Area Present Init al Projected Carbon Monoxide 0 4.5 4.9 9,2001000 Hydrocarbons 0 0.6 0.7 2,6001000 Oxides of Nitrogen 0 0.6 1.0 1,520,000 b. Local Air Quality Effects Local air quality effects are normally measured in terms of carbon monoxide. Many types of mathematical models exist to predict dispersion of a realtively inert sub- stance such as carbon monoxide. However, these models require that the source be a large distance upwind of the point of interest for the assumptions of the model to be met. To calculate the concentrations of carbon monoxide which can be expected at residences near Oak Road, a box model • was constructed. The pollutant was assumed to drift with the wind,_ but vertical mixing was limited. A detailed description of the model and justification of assumptions made is included as Appendix 2. Background levels of carbon monoxide were estimated from data collected from the air monitoring station located in Concord. The results of the calculations, under extremely adverse conditions, are presented in the table below. _ CALCULATED CARBON MONOXIDE CONCENTRATIONS NEAR OAK ROAD Federal Standards Calculated Values (PPM) Concentration Duration Present Initial 1980 9 PPM 8 hours 5.0 6.1 6:3 35 PPM 1 hour 9_0 11.7 -- 12.0 0014AY • It should be noted that these estimates have been carried out with conditions which are unrealistically adverse. Even so, the calculated values are far below the federal standards. On this basis, the local effects on air quality are expected to be small. . The relatively small volume of traffic on the road would not represent a health hazard to residents of Wayside Lane. 4. Noise The impact on the noise environment near the site would be due to automobile traffic on Oak Road. The road would pass within 20 feet of two residences and within 70 feet of several others. Present noise levels and estimated future noise levels due to traffic on Oak Road at: three sites is given in the table below. Estimates were made using the procedure of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117. A description of the assumptions made in this procedure and worksheets showing calculations are included in Appendix: 1. The calculations were made using traffic figures for initial conditions (when Jak Road is constructed) and for projected conditions for the year 1980. The estimated peak hour traffic was used. In addition, calculations were carried out to estimate reduction• in noise levels assuming a five-foot acousti- cally opaque barrier were constructed along the entire length of the road. PRESENT AND FUTURE NOISE LEVELS NEAR OAK ROAD Site Present Future Initial 1980 L10 L50 L10 L50 L 1 LSQ Without 3100 Wayside 55 47 barrier 63 55 66 60 with barrier 50 42 52 46 3142 Wayside -- -- without barrier 60 54 63 59 with barrier 49 43 52 48 3180 Wayside 54 49 without 64 59 68 63 • barrier with barrier 51 46 53 49 17 00200 • The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Policy and - : Procedure Memorandum 90-2 is the primary noise impact criterion used in assessing traffic noise impact. PPM 90-2 recommends the following two methods in determining anticipated acoustic impact: 1. Compare the predicted noise level with the maxi- mum allowable levels listed in PPM 90-2. 2. Compare the predicted noise levels with present levels. The first method is used to assess the acoustic impact upon speech, sleep and task interference. The second method is used to estimate resident's dissatisfaction with the new noise environment. The maximum allowable noise level listed on PPM 90-2 for a residence is an exterior L10 level of 70 dBA. Comparison of this value with the predicted values in ' the preceding table show that noise Levels are expected to be within current accepted standards. The anticipated acoustim impact is determined by compar- ing the predicted noise levels with the present noise environment. PPM 90-2 does not outline a method for assessing the acoustic impact based on the increase in the ambient sound, however, the NCHRP Report 117. accepted by the EPA and the FHWA has a method for pre dieting highway noise levels. It also includes guide- lines for estimating the impact of increased noise. The impact categories area measure of how annoyed the community will be with the new noise environment. The impact categories are given in terms of anticipated reaction as followss NO IMPACT: Rare expressions of dissatisfaction are expected SOME IMPACT: Some individual comment and reaction expected, _.but no group action likely . GREAT IMPACT: Strong individual comment and reaction expected, as well as group action 18 00201 The increases over existing L10 noise levels associated with above categories is as follows: NO IMPACT Less than 5dBA SOME IMPACT 5-15 dBA GREAT I:-IPACT Greater than 15dBA The table of present and future noise levels shows . the L level increasing by 8-10 dBA under initial conditions with no barrier, and by 11-14 dBA by 1980 with no barrier. These increases fall into the cate- gory of: "some impact. " When calculations are carried out assuming the existence of a noise barrier, the resultant figures are below observed background levels. This is a fictitious result due to the fact that only traffic noise is considered in the prediction method. Considering the preexisting noise from BARTD and aircraft, a more . reasonably result is that noise levels would be increased by roughly 2dBA. This falls into the category of "no impact. " A noise barrier would not be required under present standards. Were the standards to be tightened, the proposed redwood slat- rhainlink fence would be replaced in the design by an effective noise barrier. 5. Vegetation The 60-foot right-of-way would require removal of the vegetation in the backyards but would spare ten to fifteen trees directly along the edge of the railroad right-of-way. Of the twenty to thirty trees which would be removed, the most significant loss would be one unusually large and ancient California white oak which is in the backyard of 3180 Wayside Lane. The other oak at 3180 Wayside and the two oaks in the field directly east of Coggins Lane are to be spared, with the more impressive one to be left directly between the road and the sidewalk. The proximity of the road construction to the tree is likely to cause 19. 00202 • damage to the root system which could possibly result in the death of the tree. 6. Wildlife Implementation of the project would remove some trees and grassy undergrowth (see vegetation impacts, above) presently utilized for wildlife habitat. The effects upon site and nearby wildlife would be inconsequential. 7. Visual Impacts The installation of the Oak Road extension would require removal, of some of the trees and vegetation in the backyard lots of the houses on Wayside Lane. The 60- foot right-of-way would begin at the edge of the rail- road right-of-way, which would leave the power pylons in place but require the removal of some of the bordering vegetation. The new road would be visible from the homes alongside it and would make the railroad tracks and the power t line more obtrusive to the residents. Travelers on Oak Road would have an open view of the barren railroad right-of-way to the east and the adjacent houses to the west. The loss of the picturesque, old white oak at 3180 Wayside, would have an irreversible impact upon the visual quality at the site. The magnitude of this impact when measured against the number of trees in the area would be small. B. SOCIAL IMPACTS 1. Land Use a The project would convert about two acres of land from backyard gardens and vacant lots to roadway. It would increase the pressure to develop multi-family dwelling units -beyond the immediate project area. The area so affected is very dispersed due to the proximity of I-680. Properties having easy access to a rapid transit system such as BART are conferred with a relatively higher value. Upon reassessment, the county receives a larger tax revenue, and the new value structure causes . . . 20 00203 the process of conversion to multiple family dwellings to be enhanced. The magnitude of this areawide effect is not estimable with any reasonable degree of accuracy for purposes of the present report. The roadway, which would act as a conduit--providing no access to adjacent residences--would facilitate use of BARTD by people living outside the immediate environs of the BARTD station. Except for its effect in easing access to resident services for people living within walking distance of the transit station, the project, itself, is not expected to alter the immediate neighborhood appreciably. 2. Cultural and Archaeological Features No visible or surface indications of archaeological remains were pound within the survey area, nor does it seem likely that there are remains in the portions of backyards not available for inspection. There is, however, the possibility that the site contains buried or subsurface remains which might be affected by road construction activities. This is made more likely by the presence of a great deal of fill originally used for the railroad, which spills over into the proposed road right-of-way. In the event that material which could be of archaeolo- gical or historical importance is uncovered during excavation for the project, construction would be halted pending an archaeologic investigation. The impetus for this comes from two state codes and two federal acts. These are. California Public Resources Code, Chapter 1.7, Section 5097.5 California Penal Code, Title 14, Part 1, Section 622 1/2 U.S. Act for the Preservation of Antiquities (1906) U.S. Historical Preservation Act of 1966 21 3. Community Services a. Health and Safety The proposed project would not have any negative impacts upon fire or police service or manpower requirements. Rather, by improving access, response time to emergencies may be improved. b. Transportation No change is expected in public transit at the site as a result of the project, although Oak Road may at some point in the future be utilized for a bus line feeding the BARTD station. c. Traffic Vehicular traffic in the area would be affected by the project. Traffic on all streets feeding the B"RTC station is expected to increase, especially when BARTD services to Sinn Francisco are complete. Implementa- tion of the project would have the beneficial effect of minimizing traffic growth on nearby streets such ' as Las Juntas, Treat Boulevard and Buskirk Avenue. The County Public Works Department has estimated that if flak Road were completed at the present time and connected to a more simplified Oak Park overcross at I-680, the average daily traffic (ADT) would be slightly more than 3240 vehicles per day. By 1980, this figure is expected to grog to roughly 8,70A vehicles. At the same time, traffic on Las Juntas Way is expected to exceed 9, 000 vehicles. Without the present project, . . , -each of-the nearby existing roadways would experience heavier daily traffic amounting to several thousand vehicles more than is projected. Since the project would serve the BARTD station, its heaviest use - would occur at commuter rush hours. It is expected, that peak hourly flow on Oak Road would amount to 15% of the average daily traffic.. Although the BARTD parking lot fills frequently at the present time, local traffic can stili increase as more .commuters are she station io n andpicked up.driven to 22 i -.-- .'=tir-ss possibility exist, t light arrange for that the Cit station and a bus system toy °f Pleasant Hill _ this happens the at some point zn ve the BARTD Road could act as the future. If, a bus route. Theproject will not require equire an "indirect n Agency, review by the Environmental Protection pr._ under the agency's (to Code of Federal u s most recent regulations Oak Road will not Regulations 52 volume of 20 exceed the minimum as traffic on review w • 000 vehicles above whichdaily traffic would be required. preconstruction Furthermore, construction tO commence of this ive date Prior to December 3I Project is expected of the new regulati , 1974, the effect- Ons. Q- Comr►� n; ----- t Atti.ttdes Objections to t site are the fo1zowin3ect voiced b g; Y residences near the a• Noise from the road c�ou Id b Qspeci.ally to laytima bothersome, Sleepers. b- The e road would be an eyesore. c• This would be already one more road and there are too many roads. -23 r r • d. There would be no access to the road'by residents of Wayside Lane. _. e. It is felt that traffic does not justify the project. f. It is felt that motorcycles and automobiles would use the streets for racing. g. The lack of street lighting would make the area unsafe. h. It would serve to reduce the value of property on Wayside Lane. i. Changing Coggins Lane from a cul-de-sac to a through street would be hazardous- to children. j. Greater traffic would cause more crime in the area of Coggins Lane residences. k. Access to the apartments on Coggins Lane would '. be hindered by making it a through .street. 1. Rents would -have to be lowered for streetside apartments when the street is put through. m. Changing Coggins Lane from a cul-de-sac to a through street would unduly separate the two - Lincoln Green apartment complexes. NOTE: Where appropriate these- subjects have been dis- cussed in the text. rN 24 C. ECONOMIC DIPACTS 1. Project Cost The estimated total project cost is $685,000, of which $545,000 or 80% would be federally funded, and the remaining $140,000 would be funded by county gas tax funds. The federal program applying is the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) program of the Federal Highway - Administration (FHWA) . Right-of-way acquisition would total $330,000, and construction costs are estimated at another $355, 000. 2. Fiscal Imoact As a result of right-of-way acquisitions, an estimated $87 ,5001 of assessed value would be lost from the county tax rolls. This would account for a total $11,000 to $12 ,500 property tax yield reduction- to agencies receiving property tax revenues. This is an insignificant portion of local property tax reve- nues. In addition, this small amount lost from the n tax rolls is likely to be c,ffset by an areawide increase in property, value resulting from improved access to BART. As the project is not expected to increase pressure to redevelop adjacent properties, it should not have the effect of providing a windfall increase in the values of those properties. It is more reasonable to expect a reduction in property values roughly equivalent to the value of the pieces taken. The acquisition price would reflect this value change. 5. Employment Construction phase of the project is expected to provide 247 man days of employment. Maintenance of the project after completion would not require additional employees. lAssuming assessed -valuation to equal one quarter - of actual value. 25 s 00208 - . IV. UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE EFFECTS The following are adverse effects which would result from the project. Whether or not they could be alleviated, and by what means is also discussed. 1. Increased runoff: This cannot be alleviated with- out an alternative project design. However, installation of a runoff holding facility of larger than needed capacity could alleviate the existing flooding problem as well 'as that of the present project. 2. Increased noise: Although noise impacts are within existing federal standards ,. the increase involved could be reduced by addition of a solid, or sonically nopaque barrier along Oak Road. 3. Removed large oak tree: As this stands very near the planned roadway, the impact of its removal cannot - be alleviated without an alternative design. 4. Visual irnoacts : The road, railway and power lines would be made more obtrusive by the project. This impact could be partially alleviated by the planting of dense trees or shrubs along the border of the project. ` S. Taxes: The loss of $11-$12,500/year revenue to the county cannot be alleviated without an alternative design. 6. Possible disturbance and covering of archaeological artifacts could be alleviated somewhat by provision for archaeologic excavation upon discovery. t 26 0XV9 0 V. MITIGATION OF ADVERSE EFFECTS Among the mitigation measures, proposed for the project are the following: 1. The road has been designed in such a way that three of the four largest oaks would be spared. 2. If acoustic standards applicable to the present project were tightened the Public Works Department is prepared to install an acoustic barrier so as to meet the new standards. 3. The denial of access to Oak Road by. Wayside Lane property owners would serve to prevent the project n from triggering high density redevelopment of the Wayside Lane and Elena Court neighborhood. 4. If archaeological artifacts are encountered during construction, the county is prepared to halt construction while proper archaeological excavation is carried out. 5. The loss of property value resulting from right of way acquisition would be adequately compensated for by the purchasing agency. 27 40210 VI. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES The alternatives considered by the Public Works Department would involve the expansion and improvement of Wayside Lane and also the expansion and improvement of Elena Drive. Each of these would involve most of the adverse effects of the present plan: In addition, they would involve higher right-of-way costs, the division of existing neighborhoods and more complex problems= of relocation. The present project, on the other hand, would lie immediately adjacent to the railroad right-of-way which is the preexisting neighbor- hood divider. A third possible alternative would involve placement of the roadway on a portion of the railroad right-of-way. The portion of the railroad right-of-way appropriate for this alternative carries a buried petroleum pipeline. This alternate is not considered feasible due to expense involved in the utility relocation and the undesirability, from a safety t and operational standpoint, in having the railroad tracks and the road in close proximity. A fourth possible alternative is that of no project. This alternative would permit traffic congestion on Las . �untas. t�Tay and on parts of Buskirk Avenue to become more severe than it would were the project implemented. At the same time, .the congestion caused would serve to inhibit, in a small way, the expected .growth of the BART system. If, however, this fourth alternative were combined with establishment of a comprehensive public transit program linking the cities of Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek with the BART Station, it is likely that congestion on Las Juntas and Buskirk could be kept within reasonable limits without the project. This last alternative would involve a considerable initial investment in equipment at the same time that it would prevent the adverse effects of increased runoff, reduced visual quality, loss of tax revenue, lowered sonic and air quality. 28 00211 �� A sixth alternative to the present design would be to install a "T" intersection at the north end of the project adjacent to the S.P.R.R. right-of-way. The purpose of this would be to facilitate future connection of a proposed arterial road between Monument Boulevard and Oak Road. (See project description) The- property acquisition costs of this alternative would be the same as for the present design. However, the alternative is undesirable because the "T" intersection would serve to restrict traffic on the present project, thereby enhancing the need for the connector- road to Monument Boulevard. 29 _ 00212 VII. RELATIONSHIP BETtMEN SHORT-TEPA USES OF DUVN'S ENVIRONMENT AND TH MAINTENA`10E AND. ENIU NCEMMNT OF LONG-TEMI PRODUCTIVITY The present use of the site is as private backyards which can be expected to remain largely vegetated. The project proposes to replace these with a paved surface deigned specifically for the single purpose of accommodating auto- mobile traffic. This action would foreclose future site - recreational and vegetational productivity, trading it for an immediate and future reduction in traffic congestion nearby. While facilitating use of the BART system, the project would contribute in a minor way to the reduction of energy consumed in passenger travel. This would enhance �. long-term productivity by making irore energy available for future uses. In -addition it -would reduce total atmospheric pollutants and noise added to the local environment from what they would be were the project not implemented and were the automobile to remain the principal means of conveying people to the BARTD Station. 30 00213 r - VIII. IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES Site soil would be committed to use as roadway founda- tion. This would terminate its function in: absorb- ing precipitation, b) supporting oxygen-producing plants and c) providing recreation for site residents. The amount of runoff obtained from the site could also be irreversibly increased by threefold. This would amount to roughly 2 acre-feet per year. Removal of one of the four white oaks at the site would cause the visual - quality of the site to be irreversibly reduced. Each of these cha_iges would be of small magnitude. 31 • 0A214 - IX. GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS Oak Road extension would contribute to the growth and utilization of BART. It could be expected to increase the pressure to develop multi-family dwelling units beyond the immediate neighborhood. The road- way, which would act as a conduit (providing no access to existing residences) would facilitate use of BART by people living outside the immediate environs of the BARTD Station. It would, therefore, increase both the value and. the pressure to redevelop on property there. Except for its effect in easing access to resident services for people living within walking distance of the Transit Station, the project is not expected to 'contribute to the fo*N growth, or redevelopment of the immediate neighborhood. A citizen initiated zone change could trigger gger the transition to high density residential land use. However, this would be an event considered independent of the present project. 32 ' 00215 t X. BASIS FOR NEGATIVE DECLARATION This section is a requirement for NEPA) This project is considered to have no significant impact on the environment for the following reasons: 1. The unavoidable adverse effects of the project; the small increase in runoff, an increase in the ambient noise level of the immediate area, and the removal of a large oak tree are not significant when con— sidering the environment of the area as a whole. 2. Since the new roadway is immediately adjacent to the railroad right-of-way, the visual impact of the project is insignificant when considering the impact of the existing railroad tracks. The removal of twenty to thirty trees is insignificant when measured against the number of trees in the area. - � 3. The changes in the traffic patterns that will result from this project will affect only the BARTD Station, and access to the residents along Wayside Lane will not be affected. The project will greatly improve the circulation patterns in the vicinity of the BARTD ` Station and alleviate much of the existing non-resi dential traffic on Las Juntas Sway. 4. No schools, parks, recreational Areas, 'fish or wild- - life ild "life habitat will be affected. 32-A 00216 XI. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Contact with and assistance from the following individuals is hereby acknowledged: - E. Stout, J. Cutler, Contra Costa County Planning; J. Knight, M. Mitchell, R. Nugent, of the Public Works Depart- ment, County of Contra Costa; R. Conner, Flood Control Department, County of Contra Costa; Lt. 'Camrud, Sheriff's Department, County of Contra Costa; F. Nickell, Pleasant Hill, Public Works; F. Hallwach, P. Rowen, Pleasant Hill Planning; B. Kautz, Walnut Creek Community Development; C. Gabryoak, Concord Planning; J. Hanna, Walnut Creek Planning Commission; D. Jones, California Department of Transportation; M. Healy, BARTD; Officer' Reed, California Highway Patrol; Lt. Collins, Pleasant Hill Police; W. Alners, Ms. Rowen, R. Stahl, Mr. Sweetland, all resi • ` dents or owners of homes on Wayside Lane; R. Perry, . J. Brogan, D. Sloan, B. Weeks, P. Park, D. Webb, B. Doyle, J. Tinker, Stanley, J. Turner, J. O'Neil, J. Kennedy, D. Ober, D. Lieber, all residents of Coggins Lane. EIP staff members contributing to this project include: Hans A. Feibusch, P.S. , Principal G. Robert Hale, Ph.D. candidate, Project Director Edward A. Arens, Ph.D. , Climatologist/Planner Donald Ballanti, M.S. , Meteorologist/Air Pollution Specialist Douglas Donaldson, Attorney, Environmental Law Specialist Michael Fajans, M.C.P. , Economist/Planner Kristin Hayward, B.A. , Graphic Designer 33 002.. E. Charles Pilcher, M.S. , Marine Biologist Harold L. Ritchie, Production Manager Carol Wolleson, B.A. , Editor Consultant: Miley P. Holman, assistant curator, A.E. Treganza Anthropology Museum, San Francisco State University 34 _ Qp218 XII. BIBLIOGRAPHY Included are sources not referred to by footnote. Bay Area Air Pollution Control District. Aviation Effect ori Air Quality in the Bay Region San Francisco, (February 1971) . Brockman, C.F. Trees of North America. New York: GoldeZ Press, 1968. California Division of clines and Geology. Geologic . Atlas of California. San Francisco Sheet. Gordon, C.G. , et. al. Highway Noise, A-Desicgn Guide for Highway Engineers. Washington, D.C. : n NCHRP Report No. 117 Highway Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences, 1971. 34A 00219 . 04-CC-6522-CR M-6522 (001 ) Oak Road Extension APPROV RECOMMENDED Vernon L . Cline Date _ Chief Deputy Public Works Director Contra Costa County Department of Transportation Date" 41 District IV ' Concur �d a FH Aev e Awi n 4Official at t . 2 � ' l _ 34 - 8 nn ss�� 00220- APPENDIX 1 NOISE MEASUREMENTS AND TRAFFIC NOISE COi•IPUTA^1IONS a Noise Measurements Noise measurements were taken at two sites along the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Site A was located near the intersection of the right-of,-way and Las Juntas Road, near the residence at 3100 Wayside Lane. Site B was located behind the residence at 3180 Wayside Lane, At each station, 120 measurements were taken at 5-second intervals for a ten-minute period, and were recorded on data sheets , copies of which are included in this appendix. ' ' . The instrument used was a General Radio Corporation model 1565-B Sound Level Meter, using the A-weighted scale and slow response. Traffic Noise Computations Computations were carried out following the procedure suggesting in- the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117, "Highway Noise, A Design Guide for Highway Engineers." Work sheets shoring the computa- tions are included in this appendix. Traffic data used for these calculations was provided by the Contra Costa County Department of Public Works. Peak hourly traffic was assumed to be 15.% of the current and projected Average Daily Traffic (ADT) . 35 00?4 The roadway near 3142 Wayside Lane was assumed to be 70 feet from the residence, and was considered as being infinitely long in both directions. At the residence at 3180 t•;ayside Lane, the roadway would begin a curve westward to Coggins Lane. The roadway to the south, and a straight roadway from the site to the connection to Coggins Lane. Because this model would have the roadway pass closer to 3180 I ayside Lane than would actually occur, the model is adjusted so that the distance from site to roadway is the same in both the model and in the design. Oak Road near the site at 3100 Wayside Lane is considered a semi-infinite roadway extending to the north. The noise levels are adjusted for interruptions in traffic flow at the intersection of the Oak Road and Las Juntas Road. A summary of the calculations made is given below. n Site Traffic . Barrier r Case 1 3142 Wayside . 1973 No Case 2 3142 Wayside 1973 Yes Case 3 3142 Wayside 1980 No Case 4 3142 Wayside 1980 Yes Case 5 3100 Wayside 1973 No Case 6 3100 Wayside 1973 Yes Case 7 3100 Wayside 1980 No Case 8 3100 Wayside 1980 Yes Case 9 3180 Wayside 1973 No Case 10 3180 Wayside 1973 Yes Case 'll 3180 Wayside 1980 No Case 12 3180 Wayside 1980 Yes 36 Work-Sheets ' The following are work sheets used in computing expected noise levels from the Oak Road •Project. A more detailed description of procedures involved can be seen in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report No. 117 entitled Highway Noise, A Design Guide for Highway Engineers published by the Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, 1971, 79- pp. - r NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET •Line ROAD ELEMENT Nurnbor - :•• ' n Symbol Type Ref. TIME INTEPVAL r _ _ VEMCLE TYPE Auto Truck ' ;.a:, Truck Auto Truck Auto Track 1 P.eference LSO of 100 ft 2 di Dislonce 3 62 ►- Element ' v. 4 63 w Gradient - - - u 5 WS..' Vertical 6 d549 j Surface 7 d o Shielding �a) 3-niers U 167 Q (b) Structures & Plant. - Q ce8 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT = add rows 2 throe^h 7 0 V 9 L50 AT OBSERVER U odd row 1 to tow 8) - 10 W.S. LIO - L50 ADJUSTMENT N 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT VL10 AT 03SER`JFR i2 odd row 10 & 11 to row 9) G0 13 S. ELEMENT TOTAL L50 LIO - 1< YS. GRAND TOTAL LS0 = 5Lf dBA L10 = 'GC? dBA 15 L10 - L53 _ (7 dBA 37 �_• . 00223. NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET LineNumber n Symbol ROAD ELEMENT Tse .Z Ref. TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 Reference L50 ct 100 ft ��c 2 ,61 Distance 342 r••• Element v, 4 An W Gradient - - - - V 5 6ONS.3 ::� Vertical 6 45 in Surface us$- 7 4 wS' Shielding (o) Barriers Q4 7 4 Q (b) Structures S Plant. Of B TOTAL ADJUSTMENT = add rows 2 tlhrauch 7 V 9 L50 AT OBSERVE?, V odd row A to row 9 10 WS. LID - L50 ADJUSTMENT 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT U Q 12 LID AT O"ERV R odd four 10 d i 1 to row 9) H 9 50 13 S' ELEMENT TOTAL LID `f LID L4 cl 14 YS. GRAND TOTAL 1.50 Li , dBA L10 =y9 . d3A 15 LID _ L50 %0 dBA NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line Number Symbol ROAD ELEMENT Type i F TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck: 1 I P.eference L50 of 100 ff C 2 Al Distance O - 3 d2 ►- Element V 4 d 3 LU Gradient - ` - - - 5 d4VNS.z Vertical 6 45 j Surfaccee 7 A4117 WS. o Shielding (a) Barriers V 4 Q (b) Structures 3 Plant. Q ccTOTAL ADJUSTMENT _ B O cdd-ro-s 2 through 7 V 9 LS0 AT OBSERVER odd row 1 to row a 1 ,~j V 10 W.S. LID - L50 ADJUSIMENT 0 11 INTERPUFTED ADJUST.&AENT V Q 17 LID AT ^3S=RV"P. 3 odd raw l0 L 15 to raw 9) [ ' 13 '•:S ELEMENT TOTAL L50 � LlD , 14 W.S. GRAND TOTAL L50 =5q d8A L10 = C 3 d9A - 15 1.10 _ L50 = . L{ d9A 00 38 224 NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line Number S �- mbol ROAD ELEMENTY Toe 1. TIME INTERVAL ( VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 I Reference L50 at 100 it 2 Al Distance 3162 .— Element .n 4 d W Gradient - - - V 54 YS• rVertical '^ 6 d5 jSurface 1- 7 d W o Shielding (a) Barriers I V d7 4 Q Q (b} Structures b Plant. C 8 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT `Z add rows 2 through 7 i ' S U 9 LS0 AT OBSERVER add row I to row S ) - v 10 W.S L10 - L50 ADJUSTM._NT q Q, 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT VL10 AT 03SERV=3 " Q 12 odd rove 10 & 11 to row 9) • 13 US. LSO 14ELEMENT TOTAL 1-10 14 vS. GRAND TOTAt L50 = H06 dBA LID Z dBA i5 1.10 _ L50 c#- dBA f •' NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line ROAD ELEMENT Numbor 7 Symbol T e FTIMERef. INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Aute Truck Auto Trucl. Auto Truett 1 Reference LS0 at 100 ft S:� 2 d 1 Distance yLA 3 d2 ►- -Element U4 d3 w Gradient - - - - F 5 d4,rYS. Vertical ` f6j' Surface UjW.S, o Sh1elding (a) Barrien 4 C (b) Structures 8 Plant. B TOTAL ADJUSTM=NT + = odd rows 2 t!--ro_!Zh 7 f 1 V 9 L50 AT 03SERVER c add row 1 to row B 5 V 10 W,S. L10 - L50 ADJUSTMENT N 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJ0STMENT -�L • v U12 Ll0 AT 03SECVcR odd row 10 G 11"10 row 9) d3 13 'IS.6 ELEMENT TOTAL 150 S L10 (. 14 S. GRAND TOTAL LS0 =5 dBA LIO = („3 dBA 15 1.10 _ L50 _ 8 dBA 39 004 oq x NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line Number (n Symbol ROAD ELEMENT Type ^ Ff_ TIME INTERVAL ` VEHICLE TYPE Auto' Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 Reference L50 at 100 ft 2 d 1 Distance t y 3 62 ►- Element w 4 d w Gradient - - - - V F 5 d4.Y5. F Vertical H 6 d5 j Surface cc Uj 7 d �l S' p Shielding (a) Barriers -I Ll Qa 7 4 Q (b) Structures & Plant, cc 8 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT _ Z add rows 2 throuch 7 v 9 LS0 AT OBSERVE? add row 1 to row S 1 t 10 W.S. L10.- LSO ADJUSTMENT N 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT 7 ,k v a 12 L10 AT row' odd row'10 L 11 to row 9) 5C 13 166 ELEMENT TOTAL 150 ��r 14 %,.S.d GRAND TOTAL L50 = e!r dBA LIO = G d3A - :t 15 1.10 - LSO = 7 d8A 1 NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line ROAD ELEMENT Number Symbo! Type I Ref, TIME !NTE?VAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 Reference LSO at I ft �! 2 61' Distance 1:1 3 '62 s- Element - �+ 4 6,1 w Gradient V � d . 5 '(S. Vertical ►- 4 �- `" 6 ds j Surface 1V S. -' ►� 7 d Q Shielding (0) barriers V 6 7 4 (b) Structures b Plant. Q a g TOTAL ADJUSTMENT / zcdd rows 2 thr,u h 7 t u 9 L50 AT OBSERVER V odd row 1 to row 8) ,= 10 WS. 110 - LSO ADJUSTMENT if 0 11 INTEF.RUPTED ADJUST-HENT Z v c 12 L10 AT odd row 10 G 11 to row 9) 13 ELEMENT TOTAL 150 1.101 14 N5.6 GRAND TOTAL LS0 = (�p dBA L10 6 dBA IS 1.10 - L50 d9A 40 OQ921t NODE PREDICTTON WORK SHEET Line ROAD ELEMENT Number `S Symbo( I Type i Ff. 11-ME INTER`/AL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1I Reference L50 at 10J ft �! 2 61 Distance 3 '62 s- Element — y �+ 4 .6Zw Gradient - - - U 5 4,4 4S. Vertical 6 d$ j Surface oc � 7 d \'!S, p Shielding (a) Barriers . /Lt U 'A 7 4 Q (b) Structures & Plant. Q a 6 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT Q add rows 2 thr+u n 7 x V 9 LS0 AT OBSERVER odd row 1 to row 6 1 U� U s- 10 Yi.S. LIO - L50 ADJUST:!ENT N ! O= 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT i V Q 12 L10 AT=OSS££V=R odd row 10 E. 11 to row 9) Z • :J i 13 Y56 ELEMENT TOTAL LSO LIO 14 N.S.6 GRAND TOTAL L50 =�G d8A L10 =� d8A 15 1.10 _ L50 = (o d8A NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line Number �+ Symbol ROAD ELE�!fN7 Y Toe T_ 117 r of, TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 Reference L50 et 1C') ft 2 Al Distance + C( t L 3 ,62 Element �+ 4 G3 UJ Gradient - - - - U • `„• 5 di�i15. ` Vertical '^ 6 d j Surface ac 7 '66 W.S. prs lelding `/ ui a) Barriers Q G 7 6 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT + = add rows 2 to 7vnh 7 T VL50 AT OBSERVER i • 9 V odd row i to row 6 b.- 10 W.S. LIO - LS0 ADJUSTMENT D 11 1 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT oda row l0 L. Wto row 9) ., a L50 13 YS 6 ELEMENT TOTAL L �_ 10 _ 1 14 S. GRAND TOTAL LS0 a , C, d8A 1.10 �. (o L4 d8A 15 L10 L50 = d8A 41 Q02Z7 NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET • ' Lino Number /0 SYmbai ROAD ELEMENTT e Ref. TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Aufo Truek 1 Reference L50 at 100 ft 2 Al Distance it 3 42 ►- Element - �r .n 4 43 W Gradient - - - - 5 4A:.'S. Vertical 6 45 D Surface LW- 7N47 SYS• Shielding (0) on - 1 Q4 Q (b) Structures b Plant. oc 6 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT Q odd rows 2 throe h 7 - - z U 9 L50 AT OBSERVER U add row 1 to row 6 `•7 2— tl Z • F 10 1YS. L10 - L50 ADJUSTMENT � � -4 N 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT U Q 12 1.10 AT 03S=nJ R (,f odd row 10 L. I to row 9j �i 13 ..-�6 ELEMENT TOTAL L50 142- 1 42 U 1.101 14 IY5.6 GRAND TOTAL LS0 = � c� dBA 1.10 = � 1 dBA l5 L10 - L50 = dBA NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET Line Number S nb°i ROAD ELEMENT T e � Y F TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck I Reference L50 at 100 k 21611 Distcnce 1 G t/ 3 47 ►- Eloment v1 4 '6 W Gradient - - - U F 5 44;15.2 Vertical 6 45 Surface °; 41v S -' g 1- 7 o Sh1.Idin (c) 8orriers U 4 7 4 d (b) Structures & Plant. cc Q 6 TOTAL ADJUSTMENT = odd rows 2 tl:rouch 7 fit 'r Z U 9 L50 AT OBSERVER odd row I to row 6 f'n 0 cot . U 10 \YS. L10 — LSD ADJUSTMENT N 0 11 INTERRUPTED ADJUSTMENT Q 12 1.10 AT 03SERViR (odd nw 10 1. i to ro- 9) �7 13 ':5.61 ELEMENT TOTAL L50 n Lill 14 Y.S- GRAND TOTAL L50 = (c dBA L10 (0$ dBA 15 L10 - L50 = dBA 42 vv NOISE PREDICTION WORK SHEET !� Line Number / S m--;;- ROAD ELEMENT J Y Type /_/. _/_. F TIME INTERVAL VEHICLE TYPE Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck Auto Truck 1 Reference LSO at 100 ft 2 di Distance 342 ►- Element - ? 4 G Ut Gradient - - - u - F 5 4t t5.3 Vertfcoi 645 j Surface ►w 7 4 n7 4\',!S. p Shlelding (o) Barrien ^/1 QQ (b) Structures Z Plant. cc E TOTAL ADJUSTMENT zodd rows 2 throuvn 7 — Z V 9 L50 AT OBSERVER odd row 1 to row 5 U 10 VAS. L10 -L50 ADJUST:'•ENT v r_, f O= 11 iNTERP.UPTED ADJUSTMENT Q 12 LIO AT 03SEP,V R add rotor 10 L. 1� !o row 9) / 13 vv.5o 6 ELEMENT TOTAL L10 / ,? ld ',x- GRAND TOTAL L50 = dBA L10 .dBA C 15 L10 - L50 = dBA 43 0022 N �-,� ��= ►..�...� Tj A r:. n r, z r Or ------------- jr Lo- NO NO:r 5 L - 10 = SSciA 8•�Ri : Pppro^ c_cl = Coq c�f3d = (c�L4 44 00M >ovr cc a r CYC -44 _�- W c R E. lye �,,, '� j� �.��:`� �/�-• N 0;i' S o Gtly` b s7 13 A v LSA = Y9dBA 45 . 00231 - 1 t APPENDIX 2 LOCAL AIR QUALITY PREDICTION METHODOLOGY. It is desired to calculate air quality near Oak Road under adverse conditions. The pollutant of interest, carbon monoxide, normally reaches highest concentrations under light wind conditions, when a strong surface- based inversion is present. These conditions are common during the winter, usually after sunrise. The• wind conditions assumed for the model is a steady easterly wind of 2 meter per second. This condition would cause emissions from cars on Oak Road to blot directly to the residences on Tayside Lane, with the least possible time for dilution and diffusion. In the model, this wind prevails for periods of one and eight hours. Because light winds are variable, this cc.ndition is unrealistic. However, it will yield maximum concentra- tions, and will approximate extremely adverse conditions. The strong surface base inversion is approximated by impos- ing a limit on dilution in the vertical. Under extremely, stable conditions, turbulent mixing of pollutants is min- imal. However, over a roadway, cars themselves generate . turbulent wakes that dilute exhaust e < < •ssions. A reason able estimate of the vertical extent of turbulent mixing. by cars is three meters. . l Once mixed by the wakes of car,. pollutants can drift with` the wind. The requirement that the strong inversion by present for eight hours in calculat- ing the eight hour average carbon monoxide concentration is unrealistic, in that surface based inversions are normally destroyed a few hours after sunrise. Nevertheless, the calculated values will be helpful in estimating the worst possible situation. 1. _Lous Robinson, Technical Services Division, • Bay Area Air Pollution Control District. 46 00M w , f s The model itself is a simple box model. The "box" extends the length of the roadway, with a-height of three meters. The doom wind length of the model is determined by the wind speed and time period of interest. The volume of the box represents the volume of air in which the emissions can be diluted. The emissions from cars passing through the box during the time period. are assumed to be mixed evenly throughout the box. For the one hour averaging time, the peak traffic hour is used. An estimate of peak hour traffic on Oak Road is 15% of the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) . Emissions from automobiles are estimated in grams per kilometer.l During one hour, 1800 meters of wind will pass the road. This is taken as the length of the box. For simplicity, a width of 100 meters is used. As the amount of emmissions is proportional to the width of the box. Calculations of air quality are shown below for the one hour averaging time. Initial Volume of Box: 3 meters x 1800 meters x 100 meters = 540,000 143 Emissions : 15% x 3,32-0 cars/day = 483 cars/hour 483 cars x 35.0 g/M x 1/10 KM = 1,.690,500 UG. c@ 1,690 ,500 ug 540,000 M = 3.13 ug/m3 = -2.7 PPM E.P.A. , Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, 2nd Edition, April 1973. 47 1 1980 Volume of Box = 540 ,000 M3 - Emissions: 15% x 8,692 = 1304 cars/hour 1304 cars x 14 g/KM x 1/10 KM = 1;820,000 ug .co 1,820 ,000 _ 540 ,000 - . 3.4 ug/M3 .= 3.0 PPM The eight hour average is calculated the same way, but it is assumed 50% of the ADT will use Oak Road during the peak 8 hour traffic period. During an 8 hour period, the amount of wind passing the site will be 14,400 meters. Initial Volume of Boa: 14,400 x 100 x 3:4 = = 4,320,000 M3 Emissions: 50% x 3,220 = 1,610 cars/ 8 hours 1,610 cars x 35 g/KM x 1/10 KM = 5,635,000 ug co 5,635,000 ug 4,320,000 MJ 1.3 ug/M3 = 1.1 PPti 48 0034 1980 Volume of Box 4,320 ,000 M3 Emissions: 50% x 8,692 cars = 4346 cars - 4346 cars x 14 g/KM x 1/10 KM = 6,084,400 ug co 6,084 ,400 uq 4,320 ,000 MJ 1. 4 ug/M3 = 1.2 PPM These calculated values are the contribution of Oak" Road alone and must be added to the prevailing back- ground levels of CO. The background level of CO can be estimated from air quality data collected from the Concord Station run by BA.0 CD. The highest one-hour average measured in 1972 was chosen as a background. . Once again, this rrovid^_s fcr the :.crst rossi}'1-_ situa- tion. As an 8 hour background, the average of daily maximums for the worst month (December) was chosen. The backgrounds were 9PPM for the 1 hour average, and 5 PPM for -the 8 hour average. 49 0023.5 - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 In the Matter of Approval of Agreement Extension for Minor Subdivision 292-72, Concord Area. On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor - J. E. Moriarty, IT IS ORDERED that Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement extending to November 26, 1975 the agreement with Mr. John A. Angi for install- ation and completion of public improvements in Minor Subdivision 292-72, Concord area. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess . NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Mr. John A. Qngi Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors affixed this 21 s day of January , 197 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ✓ Deputy Clerk Nancy . Ortega /��f H 24 5/74 -12.500 00236 '(y 236 I MINOR SUBDIVISION AG.REII4g1T MENSIOif Contra Costa Minor Subdivision Number 292-72 Subdivider John A. Angi (Original) Agreement Date November 26 ,19 73 Surety Nage Cash Receipt G-318816 Amount :$ 1,100.00 .a,4� gv Date November 14 Extension New Termination Date November 26 19.7-5 This Subdivider and his Surety desire that this minor subdivision agreement be extended through the above date; and Contra Costa. County and the Surety hereby agree thereto and acknowledge same. Dated: Co a Subdivider - o n gi Chairman, Board Ibf Supe ety FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN County Counsel By �/ /may Deputy ATTE;;T: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk & ex officio Clerk of the Board -� Deputy (NOTE: SUBDIVIDERTS AND SURETY'S SIGNATURES TO BE NOTMUZED) 00237 t Abde of CaUnift SS Contra Costa —ACKNOWLEDGMENT—General— y 4% 14th day of JaauarY A.D. 19 75 before me, Vernes L. Lorimer a Notary Public in and for the said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared John A. A &L 14 VERNEZ L. LARDAE:R ,�i i'OTARY PUS L:t,�.•..t;Q;;IIA �< L, , COUNTY O. CON �A COSTA known to me to be the person whose name 13 subscribed to the My Commission Exrres march 8, 1977 =�j within Instrument,and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. �n Xis . I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in his Ge ificate first above written. , Notary Public in My Commission Expires 3•8-77 for said County and Slate of Caii/'onaia Nr 2?/70 070 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 ' 19 75 In the Matter of Approval of Deferred Improvement Agreement, Minor subdivision 1 -74, Pacheco Area. The Board having considered a Deferred Improvement Agree- ment with Empire Residential Investors providing for street and drainage improvements on Center Avenue, Road No. 3471 , Pacheco area, as more particularly set forth in said agreement; _ On motion of Supervisor A. K. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid agreement is APPROVED, and Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Su rvisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Recorder (via P .W.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this list day of January 19 75 �J.. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Ct�2�-r, 14,L Cir:i Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15•M Nancy S,,(/Ortega U{-'238 �1 Recorded at the request of: CONTRA- COSTA COUNTY This box for exclusive use of Recorder. DEFERRED It•1PROVEA1ENT AGREEMENT (Project: Minor Subdivision 1-74 ) 1. PARTIES. Effective on the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as "County" and Empire Residential Investors, a•JIMted partnership hereinafter referred to as "Owner" mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. PURPOSE. Owner desires to develop the property he owns as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and wishes to defer construction of permanent improvements, and County agrees to such deferment if Owner constructs improvements as herein promised. 3. AGREEMENT BINDING ON SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. This agreement is an instrument affecting the title or possession of the real Froperty described in Exhibit "A". All the terms, covenants and conditions herein imposed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of Owner Upqn the sale or division of the property - described in Exhibit "A" the terms of this agreement shall apply separately to each parcel, and the owner of each parcel shall succeed to - he obligations imposed. on Owner by this agreement. Upon annexation to any City, Owner shall fulfill all the terms of this agree- ment upon demand by such city as though Owner :.ad contracted with such city originally. Any annexing city shall have all the rights of a third party beneficiary. 4. STREET AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS A. The improvements set forth i-t this section may be deferred by Owner and shall be constructed when required in the manna set forth in this agreement. The deferred improvements required by County Department of Public Yorks are generally described on Exhibit "B" attache.' hereto: B. idhen the County Public Works Director determines that there is no further reason to defer construction of the improvements, he shall notify Owner in writing to commence their installation and construction. The notice shall be mailed to the current owner or o;mers of the land as shown on the latest adopted County Assessment roll. The notice shall describe the work to be done by o :ners, the time within which the work shall commence and the time within which the work shill be completed. All or any portion of said improvements may be required at a specified t_me. Each oi%mer shall participate on a pro rata basis in the cost of the improvements to be installed. If Owner is obligated to pay a pro rata share of a cost of a facility p -ovided by others, the notice shall include the amount to be paid and the time when pay.men, mus:. be :made. 5. PERFOF\LkXCE OF THE 1*ORK. Oi%ner :hall perform the work and make the payments required by County as set forth herein or as modified by the Board of Supervisors. Owner shall cause plans and specifications for the improvements to be prepared by competent persons legally qualified to do the work and to submit said improvement plans and specifications for approval prior to commencement of the work described in the notice and to pay County inspec- -1- 0v239 s tion fees. The work shall be done in accordance with County standards in effect at the time improvement plans are submitted for approval. Owner agrees to commence and complete the work within the time specified in the notice given by the Director of Public Works and to notify the County at least 48 hours prior to start of work. In the event Owner fails to construct any improvements required under this agreement, County may, at its option, do the work and collect all the costs from Owner. If County sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Owner shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. Permission to enter onto the property of Owner is granted to County or its contractor as may be necessary to construct such improvements. 6. JOINT COOPERATIVE PLAN. Owner agrees to cooperate upon notice by County with other property owners, the County, and other public agencies to provide the improve- ments set forth herein under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of a local improvement district, if this method is feasible to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. 7. REVIEW OF REQUIREMEtifS. If Owner disagrees with the requirements set forth in any notice to commence installation of improvements he shall, within 30 days of the date the notice was mailed, request a review of the requirements by the Board of Supervisors of County. The decision of this Board shall be binding upon both County and Owner. 8. ACCEPTANCE OF IWROWNENTS. County agrees to accept those improvements specified in Exhibit "B" which are constructed and completed in accordance with County. standaids and requirements` and-are insfal•led` within'rights of'wayor easements` dedicated'' ' and accepted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Owner agrees to provide any necessary temporary drainage facilities, access road or other --equired improvements, to assume responsibility for the proper functioning thereof, to su3mit plans to the appropriate County agency for review, if required, and to maintain said mprovements and facilities in a manner which will preclude any hazard to life or health or damage to adjoining property. 9. 30NDS. Prior to approval of improvement plans by the County, Owner may be required to ex:cute and deliver to the County a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond in an amount and form acceptable to County to be released by the Board of Supervisors in whole or in part upon completion of the work required and payment of all persons furnisiing labor and materials in the performance of the work. 10. INSURANCE. Owner shall maintain, or shall require any contractor engaged to perform the work to maintain, at all times during the performance of the work called for herein, a Separate policy of insurance in a form and amount acceptable to County. 11. INDUNITY. The Ocher shall assume the defense and indemnify and save harmless the C)unty, its officers, agents and employees, from every expense, liability or payment by season of injury (including death) to persons or damage to property suffered through any ac_ or omission, including passive negligence or act of negligence, or both, of the Develop !r, his employees, agents, contr.qctors, subcontractors, or anyone directly or indirectly !mployed by either of them, or arising in any way from the work called for by this agreem;nt, on any part of the premises, including those matters arising out of the deferment )f permanent drainage facilities or the adequacy, safety, use or nonuse of temporary drainage facilities, the performance or nonperformance of the 'ccork. This provision shall not be deemed to require the :lwner to indemnify the County against the -2- 00240 e liability for damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the County or its agents, servants or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the County. COUNTY r RA OWNER e12 r Chairman Board of uperv" - r ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk $ ex officio Clerk- of the Board E�joc;+� Ar . j,,�y,.�jio• 1 • By "X Ez', Deputy RECONMENDV FOR APPROVAL: NOTE: This document is to be acknowledged_ Dy with signatures as they appear on deed of 4PU1ic Voxks Direc• r - title. -FORM:*,APPROVED- -JOHN B. •CLAUSEN _ •-. . . .- �. County Counsel By eputy -x PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT State of California County of Contra Costa)ss. On this 8th day of January in the year 19 75 before me, s_ Tia arch , a.Notary Public, in and for said County and State, personally appeared Bob R. Wilcox , known to me tc be the person who executed the within instrument on behalf of said partnership, Wxx saisl Bob R. Wilcox also knoun to me to be one of the general partners of Empire Investors , a limited partnership, the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that said partnership executed the same. a. �► �s �as`; �`x'� : -- --- o24 f UP•IrIC IAL MEAL r ` !t y ..ommission i NOTARY PU&.jC - c�u.►rvAtru. Tis l ar i ch' CISNTRA COMA COUPITY wauw w M XM&a,WY �5 Notary Public in and for the County of . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SS. Contra Costa On ......Januaryto 75 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Michael G. Murray known to me to be the general par'ner(s) of the Partnership that executed the within instrument, and cckno vledged to me that such partnership executed the some. WITNESS m_y_h= d offlci eal. •(Seal) ..... N . Qf'FIGIAL 13C'jL _ •r g' Tis:1•1 a4 TE�eif_ :'S 111 (Nota 's name shall,be s wr cww, to etas eA�T4i� P 00242 EXMIT "A" (125-120-002., 084) The land referred to is situated in the State of California, County of Contra Costa, an unincorporated area, and is described as follows: A portion of the Rancho Las Juntas, being a portion of that certain property conveyed to Joseph M. Christen, et ux, by M. George Russi, et al, by deed dated December 28, 1937s and recorded January 24, 1938, in Volume 454 of Official Records, page 151, Contra Costa County Records, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the westerly line of said Christen parcel at the northwesterly corner of that parcel of land described in the deed to Country Club Acres, recorded January 5, 1956, in Book 2684 of Official Records at page 17; thence North 10 211 35" West along the westerly line of said Christen parcel 89.65 feet; thence South 880 38' 25" East 88.30 feet; thence South 00 46t 06" Zlest 100.98 feet to the north line of Center Street; thence South 890 56' 25" West 51.09 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose center bears North 00 031 35" East 50.00 feet, 15.62 feet; thence North 720 02t 31" West 24.49 feet; thence North 10 21t 35" West 3.50 feet to the point of beginning. 0243 .f r SIT "R" Minor Subdivision 1-74 I. Improvements required by Contra Costa County Public .forks Department along the frontage of Parcel "A" as described in Exhibit "A". 1. Approximately 100 lineal feet of curb and gutter. 2. Approximately 100 lineal feet of It foot, 6-inch sidewalk, width measured from the curb face. 3. Approximately 1,000 square feet of street paving to pave between the existing pavement and the curb. 4. Necessary longitudinal drainage. 5. Temporary conforms for paving and drainage as may be necessary at the time of construction. 6. Utility distribution services shall be installed underground. II. Relocation of Utilities Any necessary relocation of utility-facilities shall be the responsibility of the owner or his agent. III. County's Responsibility County furnished engineering will consist of preliminary design and establishment of street grades and drainage and one staking of curb line grade. Any replaament of curb stakes w611 be at the expense of the o-Aver. The construction of the above deferred improvements shall begin as outlined in Item !B of the Agreement when any of the following occur: 1. Center Avenue is constructed to its ultimate planned width by the County or by an Assessment District. 2. Frontage improvements are constructed adjacent to the subject property. 00244 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Approval of Deferred Improvement Agreement, Land Use Permit 198-71 , North Richmond Area. The Board having considered a Deferred Improvement Agreement with Mr. Boyd P. Wilson providing for street and drainage improvements on Verde Avenue, Road No. 0565M, North Richmond area, as a condition of approval of Land Use Permit 198-71 , as more particularly set forth in said agreement; On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid agree- ment is APPROVED, and Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. The foregoing order was pessed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Recorder ( via P .W.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 21st day of January 19 75 J. R. OISSON, Clerk By )JO .yL� Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Nancy S Ortega 00245 .Recor4ed at the request of: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY This box for exclusive use of Recorder.. DEFERRED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (Project: Land Use Permit 198-71 ) 1. PARTIES. Effective on the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as "County" and Boyd P. Wi *on and Luvenia Wilsons;'ids wtfe. as joint tenants hereinafter referred to as "Owner" mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. PURPOSE. Owner desires to develop the property he owns as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and wishes to defer construction of permanent improvements, and County agrees to such deferment if Owner constructs improvements as herein promised. 3. AGREEME14T BINDING ON SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. This agreement is an instrument affecting the title or possession of the real property described in Exhibit "A". All the terms, covenants and conditions herein imposed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the stccessors in interest of Owner. Upon the sale or division of the property described in Exhibit "A" the terms of this agreement shall apply separately to each parcel, and the owner of each parcel shall succeed to the obligations imposed on Owner by this agreement. Upon annexation to any City, O-wner shall fulfill all the terms of this agree- ment upon demand by such city as though Owner had contracted with such city originally. Any annexing cit; shall have all the rights of a third party beneficiary. 4. STPEET AND DRAINAGE IMPROMMEIM. A. The improvements set forth in this section may be deferred by Owner and shall be constructed when required in the manner set forth in this agreement. The deferred improvements required by County Department of Public 1►orks are generally described on Exhibit "5" attached hereto. B. When the County Public Works Director determines that there is no further reason to defer i.onstruction of the improvements, he shall notify Owner in writing to commence their ii.stallation and construction. The notice shall be mailed to the current owner or owners of the lard as shown on the latest adopted County Assessment roll. The notice shall describe the work to be done by owners, the time within which the work shall commence and the time within which the work shall be completed. All or any portion of said improvement% may be required at a specified tine. Each owner shall participate on a pro rata basis iii the cost of the improvements to be installed, If Owner is obligated to pay a pro rata share of a cost of a facility provided by others, the notice shall include the amount to be paid and the time when payment rust be made. S. PERFOPMANCE OF THE h0RK. 0%mer shall perform the work and make the payments required by County as set forth herein or as nodified by the Board of Supervisors. Owner shall cause plans and specifications for the improvements to be prepared by competent persons legally qualified to do the work and to submit said improvement plans and specifications for approval prior to commencement of the work described in the notice and to pay County inspec- i � tion fees. The work shall be done in accordance with County standards in effect at the time improvement plans are submitted for approval. Owner agrees to commence and complete- the ompletethe work within the time specified in the notice given by the Director of Public Works and to notify the County at least 48 hours prior to start of work. In the event Owner fails to construct any improvements required under this agreement, County may, at its option, do the work and collect all the costs from Owner. If County sues to .compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Owner shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of- litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. Permission to enter onto the property of Owner is granted to County or its contractor as may be necessary to construct such improvements. 6. JOINT COOPERATIVE PLAN. Owner agrees to cooperate upon notice by County with other property owners, the County, and other -public agencies to provide the improve- ments set forth herein under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of a local improvement district, if this method is feasible to secure the installation and construction of the improvements. 7. REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS. If Owner disagrees with the requirements set forth in any notice to commence installation of improvements he shall, within. 30 days of the date the notice was mailed, request a review of the requirements by the Board of Supervisors of County. The decision of this Board shall be binding upon both County and Owner. 8. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROMIEN°TS. County agrees to accept those improvements specified in�Exhibit "B" which are constructed and completed in accordance .ti+rith.County "standards •and requirements *arid are'znstalled'within rights of way" or'easements dedicated and accepted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. Owner agrees to provide any necessary temporary drainage facilities, access road or other required improvements, to assume responsibility for the proper functioning thereof, to submit plans to the appropriate County agency for review, if required, and'to maintain said improvements and facilities in. a manner which will preclude any hazard to life or health or damage to adjoining property. 9. BONDS. Prior to approval of improvement plans by the Count,, Owner may be required to execute and deliver to the County a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond in an amount and form acceptable to County to be released )y the Board of Supervisors in whole or in part upon completion of the work required and jayment of all persons furnishing labor and materials in the pejrformance of the work. 10: INSURANCE. Owner shall maintain, or shall require any contractor engaged to perforin the work to maintain, at all times during the performance of tie work called for herein, a separate policy of insurance in a form and amount acceptabl; to County. 11. INDEMNITY. The Owner shall assume the defense and indemnify and save harmless the County, its. officers, agents and employees, from every expense, liability or payment by .reason of injury (including death) to persons or damage to 3roperty suffered through any act or omission, including passive negligence or act of negligence, or both, of the Developer, his employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either of them, or arising in any way from the work called for by this agreement, on any part of the premises, including those matters arising out of the deferTtient of permanent drainage facilities or the rdequacy, safety, use or nonuse of temporary drainage facilities, the performance or nonpe,formance of the 'work. 'Phis provision shall not be deemed to require the OT.ner to indemnify the County against the -2- 0024"7 y STATE OF CALIFORNIA J ss. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) On OEC g 0 1974 , before we, the undersigned, personally appeared d Lt)i S:.VI known to me to be the person 0hose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that he/she executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal: OFFICIAL SEAL *� CLIFFORD P. JOHNSON .1 CLIFFORD P. JOHNSON, Notary Public NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA y in and for said Count and State 1 ti 4 w my Ccmmissioa Cabins AvAl a.197? i =iS�MAlintllniiANUH1ANMNfNMSA�NNNSN/MVNNN��1 - SPATE OF CALIFORNIA ' r •- t Cctttsy o, On this L Cl- of •E the year one thousand wiser hundred I 4'a/22t�— before me, Beatrice Be:tencour.0 a Notary Public in and for the County of G ^c ,State of California,residing thereia., duly commissioned and sworn,prrsonaQy appeared QFf:CIAL SEAL _I:c=T -� k0TA^nY PUBLIC .Q; IFOiR-MA hnoarrw to flue to be the person—whose nano t S nd:cr:3ed to the within utstc r C,NTVA C'aSTA CouyTY and acknowledged to me t1ta-%Ue_-esecu1rd the same. My Commissfcn Ex;.ires Cec.2.1977 I IN WITNESS WHEREOF 1 h9w hei r sto set � -and and a&ed my of cW lit the County of "` .-the day and year in crrtifrcc.c first above n. Notary Public is and!or County of�SC THC UTILITY LIN[ Post"No.60-003 —Acknowledgment---G=CraL St1te Of California. my CoMcIission Expire .. ' 009A 9+V - I liability for damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the County or its agents, servants or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the County. COUNTY OF TRA COS OIVNER Y hairman, Board of S rv- s Boyd P. w so ATTEST: J. ,R. OLSSON, Co ty Clerk _ -,txt,�e-yvvq & ex officio Clerk of the Board Luvenia Wilson B )� t✓ Y Deputy RECOAnSE\ ED FOR APPROVAL: NOTE: This document is to be acknowledged -XPETric- Works Di •ecto with signatures as they appear on deed of title. . FORM APPROVED:. JOM-B. CLAUSEN County Counsel Deputy _ t LD-81 (10/74) -3- 0249 LUP 198-71 EXHIBIT "A" Lots 4 through 11, inclusive, of Block 16, as said lots on block are shown on the map entitled "Asap of North Richmond Tract No. I Addition," filed June 1, 1915 in Book 12 of Maps at page 274, Records of Contra Costa County, California. EXHIBIT "B" Construct 6-foot 6-inch sidewalk (width measured from face of curb), along Verde Avenue between, and conforming to, the ends of the existing sidewalk at the returns on Fourth and Fifth Streets. All deteriorated sections of existing curb and sidewalk shall be re- moved and replaced. 00250 0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 LCj-, In the Matter of Approval of Request for Appoint- ment of Representative from Concord Community Forum to Contra Costa County Transportation Advisory Committee. The Board on December 17, 1974 having referred to the Public Works Director for report the request of the Concord Community Forum that Mr. Dwight 0. Thomas be appointed a member of the Contra Costa County Transportation Advisory Committee as a representative of the Forum, and the advisability of enlarging the Transportation Advisory Committee to accommodate said organization and other agencies that may wish representation; and The Public Works Director this day having reported that the Concord Community Forum has been actively interested in the transportation problems of the City of Concord and, because of this, its representation on the Contra Costa County Transportation Advisory Committee is merited; and On the recommendation of the Public Works Director and on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of the Concord Community Forum for representation on the Transportation Advisory Committee is APPROVED and Mr. Dwight 0. Thomas is APPOINTED a member. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes or said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. Pat Howlett Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Concord Community Forum Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 21st day of January , 1975 Transportation Advisory - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Committee County Administrator By Deputy Clerk Mildred 0. Ballard H 24 5/74 -12,500 00251 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing execution of lease with Contra Costa County Water District for use of premises by Supervisor of District IV. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the county a lease with Contra Costa County Water District for use of premises at 2700 Concord Avenue, Concord, California by the Supervisor of District IV, from Januar 1, 1975 through December 31, 1978, at a monthly rental of 175, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said lease. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None . ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Public Works Director Wing my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P 21st January 75 Buildings and Grounds affixed this day of 19 Supervisor District IV 7 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor- Controller By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Maxine M. NeufAd d County Administrator 0252 LEASE THIS LEASE made this 21st day of January 19 _, by and between CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, a public body, hereinafter called "the Lessor" and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "the Lessee". WITNESSETH: That the Lessor hereby leases to the Lessee and the Lessee hereby hires and takes from Lessor those premises (hereinafter called "the demised premises") consisting of approximately 350 square feet of net usable floor space, being more particularly shown on theplan attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein, on the first floor of that certain building known as the Contra Costa County Water District Center situated at 1331 Concord Avenue, in the City of Concord, State of California, to be used for office purposes for a term of four years commencing on the 1st day of January, 1975, and ending on the 31st day of December, 1978, both dates inclusive, at an annual rent of two thousand, one hundred dollars , ($2, 100.00) payable in equal monthly installments of one hundred seventy-five dollars ($175.00) in advance, on the first day of each and every month during the term hereof. Rent 1. Lessee will pay the rent herein reserved at the office of Lessor hereinafter set forth or at such other place as Lessor may from time to time designate in writing. -1- OQ25 Alterations 2. Lessee shall not make any alternations And Installation in or to the demised premises without the prior And Removal written consent of Lessor, which consent shall of Equipment not be withheld unreasonably, provided,, however, that Lessee shall have the right, at any time and from time to time, to install, at Lessee' s own cost and expense, in any reasonable manner, such office or other equipment and furnishings as may be convenient for the conduct of its business. All equipment and furnishings con- structed or installed in the demised premises at the expense of Lessee shall be the property of Lessee and may be removed by Lessee upon the termination of this lease or at any time rior thereto, provided, however, that the reasonable cost of repairing any damage or disfigurement to walls, floors and ceiling caused by such removal shall be borne by Lessee; but Lessee shall have no obligation to remove the same and may, at its option, surrender the same with the demised premises. Any of the same not removed by Lessee within twenty (20) days after the termination of this lease shall be deemed abandoned by Lessee and shall become the property of Lessor. -2- 00254 r Damage 3. If the demised premises or the building of Or } Destruction which the demised premises form a part shall be destroyed or damaged by fire, earthquake or other cause to such an extent that the demised premises cannot be restored to tenantable condition within rs ninety (90) days from the date of such destruction or damage, then either party hereto may terminate this lease as of the date of such destruction or :A damage by written notice given to the otherart P Y t not later than sixty (60) days subsequent to the date of such destruction or damage. In the event of any destruction or damage to the demisedpremises, then, unless this lease shall be terminated as here- inabove provided, the demised premises shall be promptly repaired by and at the expense of Lessor and, until such repairs shall have been completed, the rent herein reserved shall be equitably and proportionately abated. Unreasonable delay on the II" part of Lessor in commencing or carrying out repairs following destruction or damage shall entitle Lessee to terminate this lease as of the date of a such destruction or damage. } Inspec ting 4. Lessor shall have the right to enter the demised Premises premises at all reasonable times for the purpose of ..._.{ inspecting the same or making such repairs or alter- -3- 00255 thereto or to the building of which the same form a part as may be necessary for the safety and preser- vation thereof. Services S. Lessor, at its own expense, shall provide for And Utilities the demised premises of all the services and facili- ties set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Lessor shall not be liable for any interruption or failure of any of said services which shall be caused by labor disputes, accidents, necessary repairs or other matters beyond the reason- able control of Lessor. Lessee, at its own expense, shall make all arrangements for telephone service. Maintenance And 6. Lessor, at its own cost and expense, shall make Repairs all repairs to the demised premises necessary to keep the same in proper order and all repairs, al- terations or additions required to be made by any governmental authority having jurisdiction. Lessee hereby waives all rights to make repairs at the ex- pense of Lessor as provided in Sections 1941 and 1942 o' the Civil Code of ,the State of California. The Lessee will repair all damage to the demised premises result- ing from the negligence or tortious conduct of the Lessee, its employees, agents or visitors. Lessor shall keep the sidewalks, corridors, stairways, ele -4- 00256 vators and all other means of ingress and egress for the demised premises clear of debris. Indemnity 7. Lessee will indemnify and save harmless Lessor from and against any and all claims arising from any violation or non-performance by Lessee of any covenant, term or provision hereof. Default 8. Should Lessee default in the payment of any rent By Lessee or other moneys provided hereunder to be paid by Lessee, as and when the same become due, or should Lessee violate any other covenant of this lease, Lessor may, after fifteen (15) days' written notice. to Lessee for any such default in the payment of rent or other moneys or after thirty (30) days' written notice to Lessee for any such violation of any other covenant by Lessee, if such default or other violation shall not have been corrected or cured during such period or Lessee shall not be actively engaged in correcting or curing the same, reenter and take possession of the demised premises and relet the same or any part thereof on such terms, conditions and rentals as Lessor may - deem proper, and Lessor may, at its option, either terminate and cancel this lease or apply the proceeds that may . be collected from any such reletting, less the expense of doing so, upon the rent to be paid by Lessee and hold Lessee for any balance that may be due under this lease. -5- 00257 Quiet 9. Lessee, upon paying the rent and observing Possession the covenants of this lease, shall and may lawfully and quietly hold and enjoy the demised premises during the term hereof without let, hindrance or interruption. Surrender 10. Upon the expiration or any earlier termination Of Premises of this lease, Lessee shall surrender the demised premises to Lessor in as good order and condition as upon the date of commencement of this lease., reasonable wear and tear and damage by fire or other casualty or the elements excepted. Holding 11. Should Lessee continue to hold possession of Over the demised premises after the expiration of the term of this Lease or any renewal thereof, Lessee shall become a tenant from month to month at the monthly rental and upon the other terms and con- ditions herein contained. Signs 12. The Lessee shall not place or inscribe any sign or advertisement on the exterior or interior of the building. The Lessor shall cause to be placed on a sign outside of the building and in the ground floor lobby an identification of Lessee's tenancy. Assignment 13. Lessee shall not assign this lease nor sublet And Subletting the demised premises. -6- OJ258 I Notices 14. All notices, demands or requests by either party hereto to the other party shall be in writing. All notices, demands and requests by Lessor to Lessee shall be sent by registered or certified mail ad- dressed to Lessee at the demised premises. All notices, demands or requests by Lessee to Lessor shall be sent by registered or certified mail addressed to Lessor to the attention of the General Manager at 1331 Concord Avenue, Concord, California, 94520. The foregoing addresses may be changed from time to time by either party by notice given as aforesaid. Modification 15. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof may Of Lease not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of the change, modification or discharge is sought, or by his agent. The failure of either party hereto to insist in any one or more cases upon the strict performance of any term, covenant or condition of this lease to be performed or observed by the other party hereto shall not constitute a waiver or relin- quishment for the future of any such term, covenant or condition. Successors 16. The terms, covenants and conditions of this And Assigns lease shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of Lessor and Lessee and their respective successors. - 00n59 Marginal 17. The marginal notes herein contained are in- Notes serted only as a matter of convenience and for reference and in no way define, limit or describe the scope or intent of this lease or in any way affect the 'terms and provisions hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have respectively executed these presents as of the day and year first above written. - LESSEE LESSOR COUNT F,CO COSTA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATFDISTRICT r, r Chairman, Board of visors Craig kandall, P 'dent ATTEST: By t By JU UAn L. Potts, -'Secretary -8- 00260 r..' _ A¢r 2 ",b,M - S t �r� onend >✓�t 3v 5� n n 4 IL r f -uFu�t 40 I _ I - � r J � i� � � � - "��•, ' ' ! E j f N'yN+•+O � (� r� r j7�S��F4 1 f r I T{ f r� �f - { I YF=— 0-0 J El �--- _- ,� a► T cc � � k , w - m Li , Ln Jam- f (1 ' ;� �i O Ira- cr- V i 7 s - i r = r a eyi ,os JN N d, .r d y a F Ell VMT11 -1- � f bd IT H 71 1 W W Y > t r of f } it i 1 = Y I 'v Fh': wN NN 77 �J +C F7Po cu ol so TM w Y t a, - li"."•tib_- - J ^ 7 - J. z i`•'*Fr is v f - c- In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 . In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Statement of OEO Grant Number 90195. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super— visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute the Statement of Office of Economic Opportunity Grant (No. 90195) accepting funds for the operation of the Community Action Program for the first quarter of the 1975 program year in the amount- of $298,125 ($238,500 federal share and $59,625 local share) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Office of Economic Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Opportunity (2) Supervisors County Auditor— affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 Controller County Administrator J. R. OISSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 . 15-M N. In aham 00262 OPPICt OF ECONOMIC OPPOttTUNITV �• STATEMENT OF OEO GRANT Reserved for OND Approval { +. NAME ANO &Damage OF GwANram B. GRANTEE NO. FUND SOURCE COOL /Pr I ac Too"r+0. Contra Costa County Board of 90195 I S 75 03 a, CPPECTIVE DATE Supervisors = Jan„ary 1, 1975 1157 T�3C111pSOZ1 Street a. OBLIGATION DATE tDom S. PROGRAN YEAR Martinez, California 94553 mailed to Geowmarorrrauae) FROM 70 1/1 12/31 wtoutwto TawMa ►Luvlvto PROGRAM PEOEwAL FUNDS MOM-PEDESIAL NATION MINIMUM P.A. ACTIVITY PROGRAM ACCOUNT mama &"&"ago SNARE DATE NO.MON TMS � RO. CODE TNIS ACTION Ufar►lir FUNDING ' AMOUNT table) PROVIDED f i i 01 GK 1 CAA Administratipn38,500 20 9,625 3 05 GK 1 General Camiunity. 200.000 20 50,000 3 i d {i I TOTAL 238,500 Ia, STATEMENT OF 0110 AP1111109VAL Federal folds as shown is Column 9.are hereby obligated for the Program oropsed by the grantee N noted above and is the attachments to this statemeat. Program account hadgets any be m diced bar tee only andet general flesibilitp saidelises or in nccordesce with written OEO approval. The NgrFedersl Shale way Mew lies as aiit+md by OSA imarmaigng. j APPROVED By: (Typed mar sad title) GNATURE aA JAMES W. GRIFFITH, Acting Deputy • Assistant Director for Operations I-A Is, GRANTEE CEO GRANT On behalf of the grantee. l accept the grant and all dici ations. general Condit special conditions i he gh . and requirements attached hereto. There are ps s attached to th- o I � ACCEPTED BY:(Typed state and title of authdrisd official sl &MV. N. DAT[ JAN 2 1975 o 010 POWA 314(Test) AuG TI wM CN way CAP UNTr�JANo AUG. an.- GSA DC 7s.3289 003 i w OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY-COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION 1. NAME OF GRANTEE 2. GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION NO.R. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 90195 75 / o3 3. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO: •. ®ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. Q ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMBER(S) This grant is subject to the Special Condition below, in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing grants under Title II or III-B of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. PRIOR TO EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS, Grantee must submit to Region IX, OEO, an up—to— date progress report on their Affirmative Action Plan. PRIOR TO FEBRUARY 28, 1975, Grantee must comply with-Special Conditions as shown on Grant Action 90195/01 requiring submission of Inventory Accomplishments to the Regional Property Office. 1 t " _I f I f( ) � - f j I t CAP FORM 29 (REV. AUG 66) REPLACES CAP FORMS 29.29&.291).29C.294.DATED MAR 66 AND GSA.DC 69.12299 CAP FORM 29e.DATED AUG 67.WHICH ARE OWnLETE. s f26 OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY-COMMNINITY ACTION PROGRAM i SPECIAL CONDITION 1. NAME OF GRANTEE 2. G-ANT MO. PROGRAM YR. ACTICN AC. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors _ __ 90195 75 03 i 3. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO a. ---I ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. V ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMGER(S) This grant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing f grants under Title II or III•B of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. i i FISCAL LIMITATIONS ON OEO FUNDING (July 1974) It is possible that the legislation approved by Congress for OEO programs for this fiscal year may result in legislative or fiscal limitations not presently antici- pated. Accordingly, OEO reserves the right to revise this grant action in any manner which OEO may deem appropriate in order to take account of legislative and i .other limitations affecting OEO programs and funding. OEO may reduce the amount of this grant as a whole or as to any program account or accounts, may limit the rate of the grantee's authority to commit and spend funds, ..nd may restrict the grantee's use of both its uncommitted and unspent funds. In accepting this grant, the grantee acknowledges OEO's authority to make such re- visions in the grant program or budget. In no event, however, shall any revision made by OEO authorized by this condition affect expenditures and legally binding commitments made by the grantee before it received notice of such revision, provided that such amounts have been expended or committed in good faith and are otherwise allowable and that such expenditures and commitments are consistent with the cash withdrawal guidelines in OEO Instruction 6714-1 or superseding OEO directives. For this purpose, funds shall not be recog- nized as so committed solely because the grantee has committed them by contract or otherwise to a delegate agency. The grantee is responsible for informing delegate agencies of this Special Condi- tion before concluding any program agreements with delegate agencies. CAP FORM 29 IREV. AUG NI REPLACES CAP FORMS as.Is&.21b.2sc.ago.DATED MAR K AND GSA OC $9.12299 CAP FORM 29e.DATED AUG/7.WHICH ARE O111111ALET[. 00255 i OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY .COMMUMITT ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION I. NAME OF GRANTEE ' 2. C IANT MO. PROGRAM YR. ACT:.. .tom. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors __L90195 _ 75 0'3 - 3. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO i •. —]ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION D. :._.ONLv PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMDERIS) This grant is subject to the Special Condition below, In addition to the applicable General Conditions Soveming i grants under Title 11 or 111-H of the Econonuc Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. I t SPECIAL CONDITION I - i Grantee will not exceed current operating levels in all program accounts, without {I prior approval from Regional Office. f I f i i r - i I l i . t i f i f I i I CAF FORM 29 IREV. AUG NI REPLACES CAP FORMS 29,z9o.29d,29c,29s.oATEO MAR oe AMO GSA DC 69.12299 C&0 WORM 290,DATED AUG AT,tNICN ARE ovent.ttTE. 00266. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 . 19 Z5. In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Amendment to Lease with Apollo Enterprises. The County of Contra Costa having entered into a lease dated July 9, 1974 with R. Battaglia and S. Russo for premises at 3700 Delta Fair Boulevard, Antioch, California for use by the County Health Department, which lease on October 22, 1974 was assigned to Apollo Enterprises; and An amendment to the aforesaid lease having been presented to the Board this date providing for reimbursement by the County . of an additional amount of $353 for leasehold improvements; and On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Super— visor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute said amendment on behalf of the county. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enia on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Lessor via R/P Supervisors Real Property affixed this 21st day of January 197 Buildings and Grounds J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Officer r) Director, Human Resources By— Deputy Clerk H 24 12174AdHey N. In raham County Administrator County Auditor—Controller 00297 AMENDMENT TO LEASE 3700 Delta Fair Boulevard Suite 207 .:• _ Antioch, California 94509 Health Department (Alcoholic Rehabilitation) 1. Effective Date and Parties: Effective. on January 21 1975, APOLLO ENTERPRISES, hereinafter called LESSOR, and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a _political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called COUNTY, . mutually agree as follows: 2. Purpose: The parties desire to amend that Lease entered into between COUNTY and ROCCO BATTAGLIA and SALVATORE RUSSO on July 9, 1974 for 600 square feet of office space now designated as Suite 207 in the building commonly known as the Delta Fair Center at 3700 Delta Fair Boulevard, Antioch, California. Said Lease was assigned by Rocco Battaglia and Salvatore Russo to LESSOR on October 22, 1974. At the time the Lease was executed it was the intention of the parties thereto that COUNTY would reimburse the LESSORS for any increased cost in in- stalling leasehold improvements specified by COUNTY in Exhibit "B" to the Lease. 3. Amendment: The first Section 8 of the Lease is amended by adding the following at the end of Paragraph C: "COUNTY shall pay the additional sum of Three Hundred Fifty Three and No/100 ($353.00)." 4. Effect: Except for the amendment agreed to herein, the Lease of July 9, 1974, remains in full force and effect. Page 1 00268 i . In witness whereof, the parties have executed the Amendment to Lease as of the:, . . day and year first written hereinabove. LESSEE: LESSOR: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a APOLLO ENTERPRISES, a political subdivision of the limited partnership State rCal i fo a By Chairman,��II Boar of 1sors Rocco Battaglia, Genera,]- artner- j4* N. Ogyc» ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk By. Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: B County dmin strator BY- Deputy - Public Works D ector Buildings and Grounds By —�--�� Real Property Age 111 APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By n� " Deputy, County Counsel Page 2 00269 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 iy 75 In the Matter of Recordation of Memorandum of Lease with Brentwood Health Center Committee, Inc. This Board heretofore having approved a lease with the Brentwood Health Center Committee, Inc. (lessor) for premises at 118 Oak Street, Brentwood, California, for occupancy by the County Health Department during the period September 1, 1974 through August 1, 1976; and The Board today having received a Memorandum of Lease dated January 21, 1975 which provides for recordation in lieu of recording the entire original lease document (dated September 24, 1974) as executed by the County and aforesaid lessor; and Good cause appearing therefor, on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County said Memorandum of Lease, and the Clerk of the Board is hereby ordered to have the original of same, together with a copy of this order, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisor J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public 1.4orks Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Recorder (via R/P) Supervisors Lessor (via R/P) affixed this 21st day of January , lq 75 Real PropertyJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bldgs. & Grounds By :L C 'f Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • 15•M Robbie Gutierrez Director, Human Resources Agency County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 00270 I Recorded at the Request of CONTRA, COSIA COUNTY After recording return to: Contra Costa County Public Works Department Real Property Division S-h Floor, Admin. Bldg. Martinez, CA 94553 MEMORANDUM OF LEASE This MEMORANDUM OF LEASE made and entered into this January 21 , 1975, by and between BRENTWOOD HEALTH CENTER COMMITTEE, INC., a Corporation, here- inafter called "LESSOR" and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY", mutually agree and promise as follows: LESSOR, for a valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby is acknowledged, and in consideration of the terms and provisions of that certain lease between BRENTWOOD HEALTH CENTER COMMITTEE, INC., as LESSORS, and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, as LESSEE, dated September 24, 1974, does hereby lease, let and demise unto LESSEE the real property described, for the purpose of conducting normal Health Department activities and to conduct various office functions of LESSEE. The real property situated in the City of Brentwood, County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows: A portion of the premises at 118 Oak Street, containing approximately 1 ,180 square feet, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached to the lease dated September 24, 1974 by and between the parties hereto. The term of this lease is for a period of two years commencing September 1, 1974, and ending August 31, 1976. LESSEE may extend said lease for 2 years and-7 months commencing Septem- ber 1, 1976 to March 31 , 1979. This MEMORANDUM OF LEASE is made upon the terms, covenants, conditions of that certain lease dated September 24, 1974, which lease is by reference incor- porated herein and made a part hereof, and which is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, California. The provisions hereof and of that certain lease in assignment are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit to the parties hEreto their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. -1- 00271 r ` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Memorandum of Lease as of the day and year first hereinabove written. LESSEE: LESSOR: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political BRENTWOOD HEALTH CENTER COMMITTEE,INC. subdivision of the e f California a Corporation gy C irman, Board of Su er sors gess P Kenneth J. Dams a, Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Nora Lawson, Secretary State of California, By County of Contra Costa, on this Deputy 10th day of December,-- 19►►74 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: � � OFFICIAL SEA[ 10SEP1111NE R BARGNE M01ARY PUBLIC-CAL40MIA B L-1�� w, CONTRA COSTA Commission Eivitts OUNTY1e7a County Administrator B le. Deputy Public or s D' ator Buildings and Grounds B Real Property Agent APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel ' By yf�ti`o�c-oa�C Deputy County Counsel STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) On December 10th 19 74 before me, the SS. COUNTY OF Contra Costa ) undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Kenneth J. Damstra and Nora Lawson known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledgedto me that they executed the same. Notary's Signature /?6;zz OFF3 S. R. SARZ0, `a�^ C'-—A COSTA CCU;, '► w.1 1Ly Ccs ..aa Lr'. 19. 1313 it 00272 m ' � l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 _ __ , 19 35 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Contracts for Services Funded Under the Compre- hensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, Title I. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County contracts for purchase of services with the following public agen- cies, in amounts and on effective dates indicated therein, for on- the-job training projects for eligible participants to be funded by a federal allocation to the county under the Comprehensive Employ- ment and Training Act (CETA) of 1973, Title I, as recommended by the Contra Costa County Manpower Planning Council and. the Director, Human Resources Agency: United Truck Driving School of Northern California, Inc. Olsen Electro-Surgical Instruments, Inc. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. ec• Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Supervisors Attn: Contracts Adm. affixed this 21st day of January . 197 Contractors J. R. OLSSON. Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By 1 Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M N. In wham 00273 ` May 1974 CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES (Contra Costa County Huran Resources Agency) 1. Contract Identification Number 2 8 m i 5 2 Department: Human Resources Agency Manpower Project Subject: On-the-Job Training (OJT) Services for employment and training of one CETA eligible participants residing in Contra Costa County (excluding the City of Richmond) 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa Caiilfornia, (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: OLSEN LL:-�CTRO-SU1nICr,L INSTi1aJIrE:4TS, INC. Capacity: CALIFOlUila CORFORATION Address: 1069 Shary Circle, Concord, California 94520 3. Term: The effective date of this Contract is JAN 2 1 1975 and it , terminates June 30. 19?5 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit: County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 1,200.00 5. County's Obligations: County shall make those payments to the Contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions: This Contract is subject to the General Conditions attached hereto and to the Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incor- porated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations: Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the "Service Pian" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project: This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Application for Federal Assistance, dated July 23, 1974 (U. S. Department of Labor CETA Title I Comprehensive Manpower Services Project Grant No. 06-4004-21 ); Contra Costa County Title I Comprehensive Manpower Plan (federally approved)-: Narrati.ve Description of Title I Grant Application Under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, CETA Project Operating Plan, Program Transition Schedule, and Grant Signature Sheet. 9. Legal Authority_: This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 31000 and 53703 Federal Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA) (P. L. 93-203,87 Stat. 839) 10. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY,OF C 14T OSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR 'B / By C� ice,...- Lam'- ( �� Chairman, Board of i W, N. Bo ess / f � C/7- Attest: -Attest: County Clerk J. R. OLSSON (Designate official capacity 'in business.) 1, the person signing above, do hereby By Deputy certify that I am authorized by the above named business to execute this Contract and that I am actino for the business in Recommended by Human Resources Agency signing this Contract pursuant to its by laws, a resolution of its governing body, and/or any other pertinent authority By Designee required by the business. Form App roved* bounty Counsel WITNESS: L`& B ( lame) By 1, ,�' Deputy bEuez o 1'i—A lL Cao (Title) DATED: Ai1.1AR; l3_____T 0OZ74 PAYMENT PP.OV I S I ONS Variable Payment at Fixed Price (On-the-Job Training Services) 4 2 Number 8 "' I . Payment Amount. Subject to the payment limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor, monthly, an amount equal to Contractor's allowable fixed price for services, as specified in Paragraph 2. of these Payment Provisions, subject to the Contract Budget included in the OJT Services Schedule (Part A). 2. Payment Basis. a. Payment shall be for services rendered at the allowable fixed price for services, defined as the total number of actual hours of each OJT service provided each month times the fixed hourly payment amount per OJT employee •for each service within each job classification, as speci- fied in the OJT Services Schedule. Total payments within a job classi- fication shall not exceed the maximum allowable payment amount for services specified for that job classification, nor shall payments for any OJT service within a job classification exceed the maximum allowable payment amount specified for that service. b. Notwithstanding the provisions of 2.a. of these Payment Provisions, no payment shall be made for service hours on days for which wages were paid if these days occurred during a period of labor strike or work stoppage at Contractor's plants or job sites, when such plants or job sites constitute a training location under this Contract. 3. Payment. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly in the manner and form prescribed by the County (Demand Form D-15). Upon approval of each demand by the . County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee, County will make monthly pay- ments as specified above. 4. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor, without recourse, when in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Con- tractor: a. The Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been made or is insufficiently documented, b. The Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or c. Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s). 5. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions to the extent they are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: Contractor Department 002'75 � I CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions Number 28 = 452 .1'. Compliance with Law: Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and - wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection: Contractor's performance, place of business and records are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records: Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the United States General Accounting Office, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records as may be required by the county. 4. Retention of Records: The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the termination of the Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this contract. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to county, state or federal personnel. S. Termination: a. Written Notice: This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thrity-day written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perforin: The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may pro- ceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract, as the case may be. c. Cessation of Funding: In the event that funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement: This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the pa--ties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures: Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the-County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. Initials: Contractor Department MMA276 • - 1 - General Conditions d v Number 28 = 452 6. Modifications and Amendments: This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. 9. Disputes: Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final deter- mination in writing by the Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. 10. Law Governing Contract: This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations: Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to, assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. " 12. No Waiver by County: Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract�as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract: The original copy of this'Contract and of any amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment: The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work con- templated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. Such approval shall be attached and made a part of this Contract. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status: This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. ` 16. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing Board of Directors (or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of Board of Directors as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any Board of Directors of the Contractor shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Initials: Contractor Department 002'77 2 - ---------------------- ` General Conditions Number 2 8 4 5 2 17. Confidentiality: Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employess to comply with the provisions of Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and any other State or Federal statute or regulation respecting confidentiality to assure that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of any pro- vision of the Welfare and Institutions Code relating to any form of public social services will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be pub- lished or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally violating Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is guilty of a misdemeanor. 18. Nondiscriminatory Services: Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of sex, race, religion, color,- national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification: The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected With its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance: During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured with limit of at least $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with satisfactory evidence or Insurance including a provision for thirty days written notice to County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above- specified coverage. The Contractor also shall provide the County with a certi- ficate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurance coverage for its employees. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance, as to the County, the State and Federal governments, its officers, agents, and employees, so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance. 21. Notices: All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Director of the Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein.. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. Initials: Contractor Department 00278 V 3 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS (On-the-Job Training Services) Number 28 - 4 2 1 . Compliance with Federal Requirements. Contractor shall comply with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title i of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, including Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Parts 94, 95 and 98, as published in the Federal Register, Vol . 39, No. 108, Tuesday, June 4, 1974; as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. 2: Status of Participants. Program participants, including employees hired by Contractor, shall in no way be considered employees or agents of County. Contractor is an independent contractor, and County shall not have control over the methods and details by which the terms of this Contract are fulfilled. 3. Child Labor. No person under 18 years of age shall be employed in any occupation which the Unified States Secretary of Labor has found to be hazardous for persons between 16 and 18 years of age (pursuant to 29 CFR Part E). Any eligible participants under 16 years of age will be employed only in accordance with the limi- tations imposed by 29 CFR Part 1500, Subpart C. 4. Termination, Further Provision. This Contract may be terminated as specified In General Conditions, Paragraph 5 (Termination), subject to the following: a. County's termination for failure of Contractor to perform (General Conditions, Paragraph 5.b.) may not be exercised until 30 days after Contractor has been sent by County a written notice specifying the failure to perform and Contractor has failed to correct such failure of performance within said 30 days after the sending of said notice. b. County may exercise its right of termination specified in Paragraph 4.a. of these Special Conditions as to any separable part performance r under this Contract, alloying the remainder of the Contract to continue in force. ` c. Termination because of cessation of funding, as specified in General Conditions, Paragraph 5.c. , shall occur only upon County's sending of notice thereof to Contractor. d. Notwithstanding Paragraph 4.a. of these Special Conditions, County may terminate this Contract at its sole discretion upon sending notice thereof to Contractor, should Contractor dismiss any OJT employee hired In connection with this Contract without first giving to such employee prior notice of intent to dismiss and opportunity to correct the per- formance or circumstances giving rise to the dismissal action and without first consulting with County's OJT Contract representative and cooperating in a joint attempt to correct the performance or circum- stances giving rise to the dismissal action. 5. Affirmative Action Plan. Contractor shall comply with Executive Order No. 11246, entitled mEqual Employment Opportunity", as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60). Contractor hereby certifies that it has an Affirmative Action Plan which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementation of that plan. 6. Equal Opportunity. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including appren- ticeship. 7. Nondiscrimination. This Contract and any subcontract hereunder is subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252) and the Regulations issued thereunder and found at 29 CFR 31 . In undertaking to carry out its obligations under said Act and Regulations, the Contractor will designate an individual to have the Initials: - .. Contractor Department -,4 -1- 00279 l • SPECIAL CONDI T I ONS (On-the-Job Training Services) Number 2 8Q " 4 5 2 primary responsibility for assuring that the Contractor is in full compliance. The Contractor further agrees: a. That any "service, financial aid, or other benefit" as used in this clause shall include, with respect to trainees and employees or pros- pective trainees and employees under this Contract, their recruitment, registration, examination, counseling, selection, testing, placement, employment, work assignment, reimbursement, retention, supplemental education, and training. b. That the Contractor will not permit trainees and employees to perform work assisting any facility, whether owned by it or otherwise, which provides any service, financial aid, or other benefit in a manner which discriminates on the basis of race, color, or national origin. The Contractor will obtain from the owner and operator of each facility which is not owned by him and which would be assisted by the work of trainees and employees an equal opportunity assurance in the form pro- vided by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee before trainees and employees will be permitted to perform any work assisting any such facility. c. That upon receipt of a written or oral complaint from any person, the Contractor immediately will notify the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee and mail to him a copy of any written complaint. The Contractor will cooperate with the Department of Labor by undertaking such activities as may be requested by the Human Resouces Agency Director Pr his designee in an attempt to ascertain facts relevant to the complaint and assure that operations under this Contract are in full compliance. Unless otherwise directed, the Contractor will investigate the complaint . and within 15 days following the complaint will submit to the complainant and the Human Resouces Agency Director or his designee a written report of the investigation regarding the complaint including any actions taken by the Contractor as a result of the complaint. 8. Maintenance of Effort. Contractor or subcontractor sponsored level of training in existence prior to initiation of this Contract shall be continued and not be reduced in level of effort in any way as a result of this Contract except for re- ductions unrelated to the provisions or purposes of this Contract. 9. Relocation of Contractors and Subcontractors. The Contractor stipulates and agrees to require any subcontractor to stipulate that the establishment in which on- the-job training will be given: a. Has not been moved from any previous location later than three years prior to the effective date of this Contract. b. Is not a branch, affiliate or subsidiary of a business entity in another location which has, at any time subsequent to the date in a. above, relocated or expanded so as to cause an increase in unemployment or the closing down of operations in the area of original location or in any other area in which the entity conducts business operations. 10. Review and Reconsideration of Adverse Action. Upon written request to the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee by the trainee or employee, or upon the initiation of grievance procedures provided under an applicable collective bargain- ing agreement, a trainee or employee shall be given an opportunity to be heard in connection with reconsideration or review of any adverse action taken against him. If, in the absence of a collective bargaining agreement applicable to the trainee or employee and upon review by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee, it is determined that the request for reconsideration of adverse action has merit, it shall be subject to review procedures, permitting appeals by either party up to the U. S. Secretary of Labor or his duly authorized representative. In any event, a trainee or employee shall be entitled to review and reconsideration of the good cause - aspects of any adverse action which would affect his future eligibility for training or allowances. Such reconsideration and review action may either sustain or reverse the action taken by the training facility. Initials: Contractor Department 00280 s _. SPECIAL CONDITIONS (On-the-Job Training Services) Number 2 Q," C�v 2 11 . Confidentiality, Further Provision. Subject to the requirements of Para- graph 17. (Confidentiality) of the General Conditions, the Contractor further agrees to maintain the confidentiality of any information regarding applicants, project participants or their immediate families which may be obtained through application forms, interviews, tests, reports from public agencies or counselors, or any other source. Without the permission of the applicant or participant, such information shall be divulged only as necessary for purposes related to the performance or evaluation of the Contract and to persons having responsibilities under the Contract, Including those furnishing services to the project under subcontract. 12. Records. Paragraph 3. (Records) of General Conditions is hereby modified by substituting the phrase "Department of Labor" for the phrase "Department of Health, Education and Welfare". 13. Disputes. Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of General Conditions is hereby deleted in toto. Disputes between County and Contractor shall be settled in accordance with pertinent Department of Labor regulations. 14. Insurance. Paragraph 20. ( Insurance) of the General Conditions is,hereby modified to read as follows: "During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of lia- bility insurance in amounts acceptable to County, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contrac- tor shall provide the County with satisfactory evidence of Insurance including a provision for thirty days written notice to County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above-specified coverage. The Contractor also shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurance coverage for its employees. Said policies shall consti- tute primary insurance, as to the County, the State and Federal governments, its officers, agents, and employees, so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance." Initials: Contractor Department -3- vv281 SERVICE PLAN (On-the-Job Training Services) Number 2 9 — L` 5 2 1 . OJT Services. The Contractor (hereinafter referred to as "Employer") shall hire and employ CETA eligible participants who are Contra Costa County residents (excluding those resident in the City of Richmond) and who will be referred to Employer and certified as eligible by County's authorized CETA agencies, as specified herein. Employer will employ these OJT employees in such job classification(s) and provide such OJT services as are specified in the OJT Services Schedule (Employer Specification Sheet and Job Classification/Services Sheet) attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference. One Job Classification/Services Sheet shall be prepared for each job classification. The OJT Services to be provided for said OJT employees are defined as follows: a. OJT and Special Counseling: This service is skill training and special counseling given at the job site by the Employer, consisting of: (1) Practical instruction in learning the skills and duties needed to successfully perform in a particular job classification, and (2) Individual assistance in handling personal problems arising either on or off the job that affect job performance, including,-as needed, a preliminary assessment of the vocational desires and career potential of the OJT employee, job coaching, and comprehen- sive counseling relative to absence, tardiness, budget planning, and family resource management. b. Job Related Education: This service is instruction in basic remedial education provided by the Employer to assist the OJT employee in learning the math and language skills needed to perform job duties satisfactorily. c. Job Orientation Training: This service is instruction given by the mployer to assist OJT employees in adjusting to the work environment, including, but not limited to, the following topics, as needed: (1) Payroll procedures. (2) Work hours. (3) Promotion policies. (4) Fringe benefits. (5) Safety rules. (6) Supervisory structure. (7) Employee responsibility to supervisors. (8) Benefits available under union membership (if applicable). (9) Understanding of the local transportation system. d. Supervisor-Human Relations Training: This service is training in human relations provided by the Employer for those staff persons who are to directly supervise new OJT employees, in order to assist these super- visors in becoming more aware of the problems typically faced by the OJT employees hired in connection with this Contract. 2. Reports. Employer shall assist County's OJT Contract representative in preparing regular monthly progress reports or other such reports as may be required by the Department of Labor and/or the County. 3. Regular Employment. Employer shall hire the OJT employee as a regular member of the Employers work force and ensure that each OJT employee: a. Is on the Employer's payroll . b. Receives all the benefits of any other employee. c. Is paid full salary by the Employer through regular pay procedures. d. Is exposed to all the customary practices of the Employer and normal requirements of the job. Employer will continue to employ the OJT employee upon the successful completion of the OJT program provided under this Contract. Employer may dismiss the OJT employee should his work performance be unsatisfactory and unresponsive to improvement. Initials: Contractor Department -I- 00282 SERVICE PLAN (On-the-Job Training Services) Number w4 52 4. Dismissal of Employees. During the term of this Contract, Employer may. not dismiss OJT employees hired in connection with this Contract without first: a. Giving to such employee prior notice of intent to dismiss and opportunity to correct the performance or circumstances giving rise to the dismissal action, and b. Consulting with County's OJT Contract representative and cooperating in a joint attempt to correct the performance or circumstances giving rise to the dismissal action. 5. Employee Performance. Employer will not expect the OJT employee to be 100% productive during the On-the-Job training period. Employer will provide the OJT employee with the special training and assistance required to ensure his opportunity to acquire the skills, knowledges, and abilities to function as a satisfactory employee. 6. On-Site Visits. Periodic job and training site visits will be made by representatives of County's authorized CETA agencies to assist the Employer with the 'training program, to check records, and to interview the OJT employees on the job. 7. Excluded Occupations. Occupations excluded from services under this Contract are commission sales, bartenders, garment workers, seasonal workers and those occupa- tions which require licensing as a pre-requisite for hiring. 8. Employee Wages. Wages are considered to be monies paid by the Employer to the OJT employee for work performed (and do not include tips or commissions). Employer shall pay wages to OJT employees which shall be not less than the following, whichever is higher: a. The minimum wage rate required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (including any special rate provided by certification under Section 14 of that Act) to the extent that said Act is applicable to the OJT employee; or b. Any minimum wage rate applicable to the OJT employee and required under any Federal , State, or local law; and c. The minimum entrance wage rate for inexperienced workers in the same occupation in Employer's establishment or if the occupation is new to the establishment, the prevailing entrance rate for the occupations among other establishments in the community or area. Initials: .��% ntractor Department -2- 0©28UO r OJT SERVICES SCHEDULE (Employer Specification Sheet) d Number 28 = 452 PART A: Employer Specification Sheet 1 . Company and Division: OLS--N �;1LCTRO-SU.3UCr L TN_9T1UJM NTS_ T?2_ Address: 1069 SHARY CIRCL-. wiCORD CjT.T»QRidi 445;,Q Phone: 825-8151 2. Employer's product or service: Manufacture surci-cal instruments 3. Staff person responsible for administering this Contract: Name: LUGENE d. OLSEN Title: VICL PRESIDEr�' AND GE1-ERAL MANAGER Phone: 825-8151 4. Staff person(s) responsible for conducting training under this Contract: Name (s): PAULA IDUDENSLAGER Title(s): LE0 PERSON 5. Staff person(s) authorized to sign Contract payment demands: Name(s): EUGENE W. OLSEIr I-WRENCE E. OLSEN Title(s): VICE P c:SIDEEINT AND GF11-ERAL CORPORAIS SECRETARY 6. Total number of permanent, full-time employees: ElGETEEN (18) 7. Total number of OJT employees to be hired under this Contract: ONE (1) (Not to exceed 25% of number shown in 6. above) 8. Selection Criteria. Preferred OJT employee characteristics to be used by Employer as selection criteria: a. GOOD P1rfSICAL C013DI TION b. MANUAL DEXTERITY C. ----- (To be used as guidance by CETA agencies in recruiting potential employees for referral to Employer) 9. Training Location. Addresses) where training under this Contract will take place: 1069 hart' Cl rnl P, Concord. Cali o-n a 91520 10. Employment and Training in Apprenticeable Occupations. If apprenticeable occupa- tions are included among the job classifications specified in Part B (Job Classi- fication/Services Sheet) of this Schedule, Employer intends to provide OJT employees in these classifications with the opportunity to advance to journeyman status: [] Yes, ❑ No, U NA. If Yes, describe: Initials: Contractor Department -I- 00284 i OJT SERVICES SCHEDULE -. (Employer Specification Sheet) Number 28 = 452 11 . Concurrence of Collective Bargaining Agent. Occupations in which employment and training are offered under this Contract are subject to a collective bargaining agreement: [] Yes, [] No, �-] [IA. If yes, Employer has been given concurrence by the appropriate bargaining repre- sentative regarding the On-the-Job Training program and the rates of pay associ- ated therewith: [] Yes, [] No, E] NA. Indicate the name, title, and union affiliation of the respective bargaining representative: Employer's firm is currently involved in a labor dispute: [] Yes, f] No. 4 12. Subcontracting. In connection with Paragraph 14 (Subcontract and Assignment) of the General Conditions, Employer intends to subcontract for certain OJT services: [] Yes, 0 t1o. If yes, Employer's request for written approval shall show the name and address of each subcontractor, the type of training service to be subcontracted, and the length of time the subcontracted service is to be provided. The OJT and Special Counseling service may not be subcontracted. Employer shall be responsible for fulfilling all obligations and for adequacy of performance under this Contract, including any services provided through a subcontract. 13. Previous Contract Experience. Employer has been awarded or participated in previous employee training contracts: 50 Yes, [] No. If Yes, specify awarding agency and contract number(s): WORK INCF MVF, PROGRAM OJT; #75002655, #75001653 14. Hiring Schedule. Under the "Hire First" Principle, Employer must hire each parti- cipant prior to his receiving any training services under this Contract. Employer may not hire participants prior to the effective date of this Contract. Employer Will fill all job openings established hereunder during the 60 day period beginning from the effective date of this Contract; this period shall be known as the Hiring Period. Budgeted Contract funds for such job positions that are unfilled at the expiration of the Hiring Period shall be automatically deobligated from the Contract upon County's written notice thereof to Employer. Vacated job positions can be refilled during the Hiring Period; however, no dropouts can be replaced after 60 days on the job. Employer's expected rate at which participants will be hired during each 30 day segment of the Hiring Period is as follows: First 30 day period: one (1) Second 30 day period: I:ore (0) 15. Contract Budget. Employer shall provide OJT services in strict accordance with the following Contract Budget: TOTAL AMOUNT FOR CONTRACT TERM a. OJT Services (All ,job classifications) ( 1 ) On-the-Job Training and Special Counseling S1,200.00 (2) Job Related Education S (3) Job Orientation Training S (4) Supervisor-Human Relations Training S b. Maximum Allowable Contract Amount S 19200.00 Initials: L Cori trac tor bt.par trneri t 00285 OJT SERVICES SCHEDULE (Job Classification/Services Sheet) Number2 8 - 4 5 2 PART B. Job Classification/Services Sheet (? 1 of � ) 1 . Job Classification: ,,SSD•EIER, Si•1I;i1 P;-ICS 2. DOT No.: 7o6.884 3. Starting wage: 53.00 Ending wage: 5 .00 4. Authorized number of OJT employees for this job classification: one W 5. OJT services to be provided by Employer for OJT employees in this job classification: a. OJT Services. (1) OJT and Special Counseling: .(a) Number of OJT employees to receive this service.. ......... on W (b) Hours of OJT/SC per employee... ........... 800 . ... ..... .... (c) Fixed hourly payment amount for OJT/SC per employee.... ...0-50 (d) Maximum allowable payment amount for this service: (a) x (b) x (c)..... ..... ...$ 1,200.00 (2) Job Related Education: (a) Number of OJT employees to receive this service........... --- (b) Hours of JRE per employee.. --- (c) Fixed hourly payment amount for JRE (starting wage plus --- $2.00 instructional cost) per employee... . .. ... ...........S (d) Maximum allowable payment amount for this service: (a) x (b) x (c).......... ... ... .......... ............ ......$ --- (3) Job Orientation Trainino: (a) Number of OJT employees to receive this service.... ....... (b) Hours of JOT per employee... o...... ............o......... --- (c) Fixed hourly payment amount for JOT (starting wage plus $2.00 instructional cost) per employee ........ ...... .....S--- (d) Maximum allowable payment amount for this service: (a) x (b) x (c) ........ ....... ............................5 --- (4) Supervisor-Human Relations Training: (a) Number of Supervisors to receive this service........ ..... --- The number of supervisors times the hours of S/liRT per supervisor, (a) x (b), may not exceed the authorized number of OJT employees for this job classification (specified in 4. above) times 4 (the maximum allowable hours of S/HRT per authorized OJT employee). (b) Hours of S/HRT per supervisor.. ... . --' ...... .. ... ............ (Not to exceed 4 hours per OJT employee) (c) Fixed hourly payment amount for S/HRT per OJT employee supervisor. .... . . .... .. .. . ... .... ................. .. .... ..S 6.25 (d) Maximum allowable payment amount for this service: (a) x (b) x (c) .. . . . . ... . ........................... ..... .S --- b. Maximum Allowable Payment Amount in This Job Classification. 1 )(d) + (2)(d) + (3)(d) + (4)(d). . .. . ....... . . ... . .. . . ... .. ...... .S!,2CO.00 Initials: Con tr:i,.t,)rV�� r•s�,i, i Standard o,-v, May 1974 CONTRACT FOR FURCHAS-E OF SE3YICES (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) 1. Contract Identification Number 2 8 4 16 Department: Human Resources Agency Manpower Project Subject: Truck Driver Training Program for CETA eligible participants residing in Contra Costa County (excluding the City of Richmond) 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa California, (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: United Truck Driving School of Northern California, Inc. Capacity: California corporation Address: 30135 Industrial Parkway S. W., Hayward, California 94545 3. Term: The effective date of this Contract is JAN 2 11975 and it terminates June 30, 1975, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit: County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 12,500 5. County's Obligations: County shall make those payments to the Contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions: This Contract is subject to the General Conditions attached hereto and to the Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incor- porated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations: Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that Work described in the "Service Plan" attached 'hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all .the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project: This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the .application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: "Grant Signature Sheet"; "Application for Federal Assistance", dated July 23, 1974; "Narrative Description of Title I Grant Application Under the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, Contra Costa County, June, 1974"; "CETA Project Operating Plan", "Program Transition Schedule", "Assurances and Certifications", dated'. July 23, 1974; all pertaining to Grant Number 06-4004-21 and Federally approved. 9. Legal Authority: This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Section 53703 Federal Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (CETA), P. L. 93-203, 87 Stat. 839, as amended 10. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY 00"C NT ST CALIFO I CONTR4CTOR By By i a , Boar' of rvisors i W.. N. Boggess Attest: County Clerk (Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By Deputy State of California ) County of Contra Costa ) ss. Recommended by Human Resources Agency ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and By Designee business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ they signed it and that the corporation Form Ap roved: County Counsel or partnership named above executed the 1 _ within instrument pursuant to its bylaws BY Deputy or a resolution of its board of directors. � - A � - n Dated: IV R0oE2T J. FR0CT02 Cc . i xx .xrxx'^asZis T>-puty is ion•,.: Clerk CCC Standard Form : M6367 May 1974 PAY4ENT PROVISIONS Flat Unit Rate NUMER 2 8 41 6 1. Amount. Subject to the payment limit of this contract, County will pay Contractor A� S � per unit as defined in the Service Plan; lX" ii9§*X4ffM 2. Payment. Contractor shall submit written documents monthly 'in the manner and form prescribed by the County (Demand Form D-15). Upon approval of each demand by the County Human Resources Director or his designee, County will make interim monthly payments at the rate specified above. 3.' Right to withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor, with- out recourse, when in the opinion of the County expressed In writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or In part, either has not been made or is Insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently Itemize or document its demand(s). 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit-exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions to the extent they are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obli- gations under this Agreement. Initials:. :L>, Contractor Department ,i Ili - 00288 x CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions Q A Number Q `# 1. Compliance with Law: Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection: Contractor's performance, place of business and records are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3.' Records: AM Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, the United States . Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the United States General Accounting Office, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records as may be required by the county. 4. Retention of Records: The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the termination of the Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this contract. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to county, state or federal personnel 5. Termination. a. Written Notice: This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thrity-day written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform: The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may pro- ceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract, as the case may be. c. Cessation of Funding: In the event that funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement: This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures: Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided. herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf" of the County by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. Initials: Contractor Department 00289 s _ CONTRJ.CT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions Number 2Q v 8. Modifications and Amendments: This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. 9. Disputes: Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final deter- mination in writing by the Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. 10. Law Governing Contract: This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County: Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract: The original copy of this. Contract and of any amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment: The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work con- templated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. Such approval shall be attached and made a part of this Contract. This ' Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status: This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing Board of Directors (or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of Board of Directors as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any Board of Directors of the Contractor shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Initials: Contractor Dep rtment 000VV CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions 2 8 m 4 1 6 Number 1 17. Confidentiality: Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employess to comply with the provisions of Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and any other State or Federal statute or regulation respecting confidentiality to assure that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of any pro- vision of the Welfare and Institutions Code relating to any form of public social services will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be pub- lished or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally violating Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is guilty of a misdemeanor. 18. Nondiscriminatory Services: , Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification: The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance: During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured with limit of at least $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with satisfactory evidence of Insurance including a provision for thirty days written notice to County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above- specified coverage. The Contractor also shall provide the County with a certi- ficate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurance coverage for its employees. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance, as to the County, the State and Federal governments, its officers, agents, and employees, so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance. 21. Notices: All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Director of the Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. Initials: Contractor Department 00291 SPECIAL CONDITIONS Q Number 2 8 4 16 1. Compliance with Federal Requirements. Contractor shall comply with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title 1 of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, including Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A, Parts 94, 95 and 98, as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 108, Tuesday, June 4, 1974; as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Available Copies. Copies of the County's Project documents (as specified in Paragraph 8, Project, of the Contract), and all pertinent federal statutes, regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to this Contract, shall be available at all times for inspection by the Contractor during regular business hours at the Offices ` Of the County Human Resources Agency, !Martinez, California. 3. Retained Powers. Al-1 powers not explicitly vested in the Contractor remain In the County. 4. Status of Participants. Program participants, including employees hired by Contractor, shall in no way be considered employees or agents of County.. Contractor Is an independent contractor, and County shall not have control over the methods and details by which the terms of this Contract are fulfilled. 5. Child Labor. No person under 18 years of age shall beemployed in any occupation which the United States Secretary of Labor has found to be hazardous for persons between 16 and 18 years of age (pursuant to 29 CFR Part E). Any eligible participants under 16 years of age will be employed only in accordance with the limita- tions imposed by 29 CFR Part 1500, Subpart C. 6. Termination, Further Provision. This Contract may be terminated as specified In General Conditions, Paragraph 5 (Termination), subject to the following.- a. ollowing:a. County's termination for failure of Contractor to perform (General Conditions, Paragraph 5.b.) may not be exercised until 30 days after Contractor has been sent by County a written notice specifying the failure to perform and Contractor has failed to correct such failure of performance within said 30 days after the sending of said notice. b. County may exercise its right of termination specified in Paragraph 6.a. of these Special Conditions as to any separable part performance under this Contract, allowing the remainder of the Contract to continue In force. c. Termination because of cessation of funding, as specified in General Conditions, Paragraph 5.c., shall occur only upon County's sending of notice thereof to Contractor. 7. Statistics and Reports. Contractor shall keep and maintain such documents, records, and accounts as may be required by the County or the federal statutes, regu- lations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant hereto. Contractor shall com- pile, compute, and provide to County all such statistics and program reports as may be required by County. Said documents, records, accounts, statistics, and reports shall be maintained and provided in the form and manner prescribed by County. 8. Affirmative Action Plan. Contractor shall comply with Executive Order No. 11246, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity", as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60). Contractor hereby certifies that it has an Affirmative Action Plan which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis Of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementation of that plan./ f I Initials: Contractor Department -1- 00292 d SPECIAL CONDITIONS Number 28 - 416 9. Records. Paragraph 3 (Records) of General Conditions is hereby modified by substituting the phrase "Department of Labor" for the phrase "Department of Health, Education and Welfare". 10. Disputes. Paragraph 9 (Disputes) of General Conditions is hereby deleted In toto. Disputes between County and Contractor shall be settled in accordance with pertinent Department of Labor regulations. 11 . Assurances and Certifications. As a further condition, Contractor shall comply with those federal requirements and make those assurances and certifications set forth in the "Assurances and Certifications" (Exhibit A), attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Initials: Contractor Department -2- 00233 EXHIBIT A Assurances and Certifications AA p ��+ Subject to the General and Special Conditions: Number�G 8 t3 A. General Assurances The Contractor assures and certifies that: 1 . It will comply with the requirements of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-203, 87 Stat. 839), hereafter referred to as the Act, and with the regulations and policies promulgated thereunder; and 2. It will comply with OMB Circulars Numbers A-87, A-95, and A-102, as those circu- lars relate to the utilization of funds, the operation of programs, and the maintenance of records, books, accounts, and other documents under the Compre- hensive Employment and Training Act. 3. It possesses legal authority to enter into this Contract; a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the Contractor's governing body, authorizing the execution of the Contract, includ- ing all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the Contractor to act in connection with the Contract. 4. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-354) and in accordance with Title VI of the Act. No person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin, be excluded from parti- cipation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimina- tion under any program-or activity for which the Contractor receives Federal financial assistance, and Contractor will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this provision. 5. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d) prohibiting employment discrimination where ( 1 ) the primary purpose of a program Is to provide employment or (2) discriminatory employment practices will result In unequal treatment of persons who are or should be benefiting from the federally funded activity. 6. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which pro- vides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally assisted programs. 7. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limit the political activity of employees. 8. The program under the Act does not involve political activities. 9. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business or other ties. 10. It will give the Department of Labor, County, and the Comptroller General, through any authorized representative, the access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents related to this Contract. 11 . No person with responsibilities in the operation of any program under the Act will discriminate with respect to any program participant or any applicant for participation in such program because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, political affiliation or beliefs. (Sec. 603(1 ), 612) 12. Participants in the program will not be employed on the construction, operation or maintenance of that part of any facility which is used for religious instruc- tion or worship. (Sec. 603(3)) 13. Appropriate standards for health and safety in work and training situations will be maintained. (Sec. 603(5)) Initials: (_onTr31Ctor Department - I - 00294 i Assurances and Certifications Number 2 $ 4 16 14. Conditions of employment or training will be appropriate and reasonable with regard to the type of work, the geographical region and the proficiency of the Contractor. (Sec. 603(4)) 15. Appropriate workmen's compensation protection will be provided to all partici- pants. (Sec. 603(6)) 16. The program will not result in the displacement of employed workers or impair existing contracts for services or result in the substitution of Federal funds for other funds in connection with work that would otherwise be performed. (Sec. 603(7)) 17. Training will not be for any occupations which require less than two weeks of pre-employment training, unless immediate employment opportunities are available in that occupation. (Sec. 603(8)) 18. Training and related services will , to the maximum extent practicable, be consistent with every individual 's fullest capabilities and lead to employment- opportunities which will enable participants to become economically self- sufficient. (Sec. 603(9), 105(a)(6)) 19. Institutional skill training and training on the job shall only be for occupa- tions in which the Secretary of Labor or County has determined there is reasonable opportunity for employment. (Sec. 603(10)) 20. CETA funds will , to the extent practicable, be used to supplement, rather than supplant, the level of funds that would otherwise be available for the planning and administration of programs under the Contractor's direction. (Sec. 60301 )) 21 . It will submit reports as required by the Secretary and will maintain records and provide access to them as necessary for the Secretary's review to assure that funds are being expended in accordance with the purposes and provisions of the Act, including the maintenance of records to assist the Secretary in determining the extent to which the program meets the special needs of dis- advantaged, chronically unemployed, and low income persons for meaningful employment opportunities. (Sec. 603( 12), 311 (c)) 22. The program will , to the maximum extent feasible, contribute to the occupational development or upward mobility of individual participants. (Sec. 60303)) 23. The program has adequate administrative and accounting controls, personnel standards, evaluation procedures, availability of in-service training and technical assistance programs, and other poiicies as may be necessary to promote the effective use of funds. (Sec. 603( 14)) 24. The program makes appropriate provision for the manpower needs of youth in the area served (Sec. 60305)), and will assure that (a) Individuals receiving training on the job shall be compensated by the employer at such rates, including periodic increases, as may be deemed reasonable under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, but in no event at a rate less than that specified in Section 6(a)( 1 ) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 or, if higher, under the applicable State or local minimum wage law. (Sec. 111 (b)) (b) Persons employed in public service jobs under this Act be paid wages which shall not be lower than whichever is the highest of (a) the minimum wage which would be applicable to the employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, if Section 6(a)( 1 ) of such title applies to the participant and if he were not exempt under Section 13 thereof, (b) the State or local minimum wage for the most nearly comparable covered employment, or (c) the prevailing rates of pay for persons employed in similar public occupations by the same employer. (Sec. 208(a)(2)) - 25. It will comply with the labor standards .requirements set out in Section 606 of the Act. Is Initials: t11, Contractor Department 00295 Assurances and Certifications Number2 V - 41 6 26. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Department of Labor concern- ing special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-102. 27. Services and activities provided under this Act will be administered by or under .the supervision of the Contractor. (Sec. 105(a)( 1 )(D) (Sec. 205(c)( 1 )) i 28. The Contractor further assures and certifies that neither it nor any other units planned for participation in the project are listed on a debarred list due to violations of Titles VI or Vll of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, nor are any pro- posed parties to the Contract aware of any pending action which might result in such debarment. B. Additional Assurances for Title I Programs In carrying out programs under Title I of the Act, the Contractor assures and certi- fies that: 1 . Manpower services, including job development, will be provided to those most in . need of them including low income persons and persons of limited English-speaking ability and that the need for continued funding of programs of demonstrated effectiveness is considered in serving such persons. (Sec. 105(a)(1 )(D)) 2. Programs of institutional skill training will be designed for occupations in which skill shortages exist. (Sec. 105(a)(6)) 3'. It will make such arrangements as are prescribed by regulation to assist the Secretary in carrying out his responsibilities under Sections 105 and 108 of the Act. (Sec. 105(a)(7)) Initials: ' Contractor Department - 3 - 00296 r SERVICE PLAN A Q Number 2 V — 4 1 6 1. Service. The service to be provided by the Contractor (United Truck Driving School of Northern California, Inc.) for the County is a five week, com- prehensive training program in truck driving at the fob entry level for CEPA eligible participants residing in Contra Costa County (excluding the City of Richmond). Contractor will train program participants such that they will be able to obtain both a Class I California Driver License and regular, unsubsidized employment in the truck driving and transportation industry. Contractor's training program shall consist of: a. Two 5 day weeks of classroom instruction, 6 hours per day, in U. S. Department of Transportation rules and regulations for drivers, California State Department of Motor Vehicles rules and regulations, driving procedures, driver responsibilities, and vehicle maintenance. b. Three weeks of equipment training in operating equipment which requires a Class I California Driver License. C. Additional classroom and behind the-wheel truck driving experience, as needed, to enable program participants to qualify for a Class I Califor- nia Driver License and U. S. Department of Transportation Interstate Driving Certificate. d. Instruction in the following entry-level occupations: (1) Heavy Duty Diesel Truck Driver, (2) Gasoline Truck Driver (Bob-Tail or Straight Truck), (3) Gasoline or Diesel Bus Driver, or (4) Truck Hosteler (Yard Man). e. Daily, individual counseling for program participants, as needed, to ensure successful training and fob placement; including guidance and coaching in personal development, job orientation, employment tests, and interview techniques. f. Placement of program participants in fobs in point cooperation with County's established CEPA Units and other assistance, as needed, in obtaining employment when duly licensed. 2. Program Administration. The administration of this training program will be as follows: a. Admission Standards. Contractor shall admit CEPA eligible adults who have: (1) Been screened and referred by counselor's in the County's CETA Units, (2) Passed the California Achievement Test (CAT), (3) Passed a physical examination (paid for out of CETA Rinds), and (4) Passed screening for admission by Contractor. b. Referral and Enrollment. (1) Contractor shall accept for enrollment in its training program at least 10 CETA eligible participants referred by County's established CETA Units. (2) Contractor's enrollment of said participants shall be upon point concurrence with the referring CETA Unit. (3) Contractor has-the right to deny enrollment to any referred partici- pant, but only following a cooperative attempt with the CETA Unit to help the participant meet the requisite admission standards. (4) Contractor has the right to terminate any enrollee from training when the participants' conduct or course progress prove to be unacceptable to Contractor, but only following prior consultation and a cooperative attempt with the CETA Unit to correct the condi- tion giving rise to such termination action. ! ' Initials: A/ '//, r�511`5 Contractor Department SERVICE PLAN Number 2 8 m 4 l 6- (5) Contractor shall maintain an "open-entry" policy whereby partici- pants may be continuously enrolled in the training program at the time they are referred by County's CETA Units, as veli as an "open- exit" policy whereby program participants may be placed directly In employment as truck drivers (and thus terminated from training) upon achieving entry-level employability and minimum training course goals and prior to completing the entire training program. (6) Vacated training positions under this Contract shall be immediately available to new referrals from the CETA Units and Contractor shall notify the CETA Units with advance notice immediately upon planning an enrollee graduation, fob placement, or other termination. M Contractor shall immediately notify the referring CEPA Unit should a program enrollee miss three consecutive days of training for any reason. (8) A training position under this Contract will be considered available to new referrals immediately upon verification that an enrollee will not be continuing the training program, or following the absence of an enrollee for seven (7) consecutive school days due to illness, family care, or for any other reason. (9) Termination or furlough of program enrollees due to an absence will be upon point agreement by the Contractor and the CETA Unit and such former enrollees can likewise be re-enrolled upon point concurrence of the Contractor and the CETA Unit. C. Attendance. Contractor shall verify the daily attendance of program participants for the County and shall continue in its training program those participants who continue to meet its attendance requirements and achievement standards: d. Job Referral. Contractor will refer job-ready participants to fob open- ings of which it has knowledge and to County's CETA Units for fob placement. 3. Program Specifications. Subject to and insofar as not inconsistent with this Service Plan, Contractor's services under this Contract shall be as specified in the following cited program description submitted by Contractor to County (and on file with the County Hamman Resources Agency), which is incorporated herein by reference: "United Truck Driving School, Inc. , UTDS, United Truck Driving School of Northern California, Inc." seven pages, including the section entitled "Course Description and Objectives" which begins on Page 3. b. Performance Standards. Program performance standards for the Contractor during the Contract term will be to train at least ten (10) CETA eligible partici— pants such that said participants complete the training program and/or obtain a Class I California Driver License and U. S. Department of Transportation Interstate Driving Certificate. 5. Monitoring. Services and performance under this Contract will be monitored as follows: _ a. Contractor's Staff vill meet at least once per quarter with County Manpower Staff to discuss progress of the Contractor towards achieving stated goals and to assist Contractor's Staff in -solving problems. b. Contractor's fiscal and Management Information System (MIS) reports will be reviewed monthly by County Manpower Staff, who will also meet and con- fer with Contractor's Staff as necessary to assist in developing an effective program. C. Contractor's clients served under this Contract will be followed-up on by County Staff at 30 and 90 day intervals following program graduation. 6. Service Unit. A unit of service for payment purposes is defined as one CETA eligible participant referred under this Contract who successfully com- pletes Contractor's training program and/or obtains a Class I California Driver License and U. S. Department of Transportation Interstate Driving Certificate. Initials: Contractor Department -2- VV��7 d . � s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 ' 19 75, In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Lease with Mr. A. F. Bray, Jr. , et al. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a one—year lease commencing February 1, 1975 with Mr. A. F. Bray, Jr. ,. et al for premises at 739 Ward Street, Martinez, California for use by the Conservatorship Unit of the Office of the County Counsel.. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P affixed this 21st day of January 1975 Buildings and Grounds J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Count�,,,�Yy Counsel By Deputy Clerk H 24 12r�60ry Auditor-Controller N. Infkaham 0U299 r LEASE 739 Ward Street Martinez', California 94553 County Counsel Branch Office 1. Parties: Effective January 21 , 1975, A. F. BRAY, JR., THOMAS MC GOWAN, JOHN B. OGDEN and CLIFFORD A. EGAN hereinafter called LESSOR and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY", mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Lease of Premises: LESSOR, in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, hereby leases to COUNTY, and COUNTY hereby hires from LESSOR, 696 square feet of office space in the building on the northwest corner of Ward and Ferry Streets, Martinez, California 94553. Said leased office area is designated as 739 Ward Street and is more particularly shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. In addition, COUNTY shall have the right to use all common areas, including any rest- room facilities in said building. 3. Term: The term of this agreement is for one year commencing February 1 , 1975 and ending January 31, 1976. Any holding over after the initial term will be on a month- to-month basis under the same terms and conditions. During the holding over period, the agreement may be terminated by either party by giving the other party thirty (30)' days' prior written notice of said termination. 4. Rental : COUNTY agrees to pay to LESSOR as rent the monthly rental sum of One Hundred Ninety and No/100 Dollars ($190.00) in advance, on the tenth day each month. Payments are to be sent to A. F. Bray, Jr. , et al at 736 Ferry Street, Martinez, California 94553. ` 5. Use of Leased Premises: The premises shall be used during the term hereof for the operation of a County office. COUNTY will notify LESSORS of any proposed change in occupancy of the premises. In the event the proposed occupant is not acceptable to LESSOR, this agree- ment may be terminated by LESSOR by giving COUNTY 30 days prior written notice of said termination. - 1 - 000VO - _6. Utility Systems: LESSOR shall furnish and maintain any and all electrical , water, plumbing, heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems in good working order. 7. Utilities and Janitorial Services: COUNTY shall pay for all gas, electric, and refuse collection services pro- vided to the leased premises. It is understood there is one meter for the entire building and COUNTY's share of the gas and electric utility services shall be 16.2% of the amount used by the entire building of which the leased premises are a part. LESSORS shall submit an invoice quarterly, together with zerox copies of the utility bills, to Contra Costa County, Room 115, Courthouse, Martinez, for reimbursement of the COUNTY's share. LESSOR shall , during the term of this agreement, provide any water used in conjunction with the occupancy of the leased premises. COUNTY shall provide its own janitorial services and shall replace any and all electric lamps and ballasts in the lighting system after original repair and relamping by LESSOR. 8. Maintenance and Repairs: (a) LESSOR shall keep the exterior of the building and all the grounds in good order, condition and repair, including all exterior doors and their fixtures, closures and hinges. (b) COUNTY shall keep and maintain the interior of the premises in good order, condition and repair, except as stated in Section 6 herein, but LESSOR shall repair damage to the interior caused by failure to maintain the exterior in good repair, including damage to the interior caused by roof leaks and/or interior and exterior wall leaks. (c) COUNTY shall replace plate glass windows broken by its employees, agents, or invitees; if broken otherwise, LESSOR shall replace them. (d) LESSOR shall be responsible for the correction of any Code violations which may exist in the building. 9. Minor Alterations, Fixtures, and Signs: COUNTY may make any lawful and proper minor alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises, which shall remain COUNTY's property and may be removed therefrom by COUNTY prior to the termination of this lease. -2- 00301 10. Accomplishment of Improvements: (a) LESSORS shall provide the following repairs and improvements to the leased premises: (1) Repaint the interior of the premises including ceiling tiles as required. (2) Replace any broken floor tiles. (3) Repair lock cylinders on front and back doors. (4) Replace defective ballasts and relamp florescent lighting fixtures as required. (b) COUNTY shall provide the following improvements which at the option of the COUNTY, may be removed at the termination of this agreement. (1) Install Mills type, metal 7' high partitions required to divide the interior space into two private offices. (2) Install curtains, blinds or other window covering as required. 11 . COUNTY shall have the right of immediate prior possession to the leased premises for the purpose of installing telephones, partitions, and other items re- quired to prepare space for COUNTY's occupancy. 12. Hold Harmless: It is understood and agreed that LESSOR shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises while said persons are on COUNTY business and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whomsoever while in or upon said leased premises during said term in conjunction with the performance of COUNTY business; and COUNTY hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said leased premises, except that in the case of any structural , mechanical , or other failure of equipment or building owned by LESSOR, which results in damage to any person or property, LESSOR will be held liable. LESSOR agrees to hold COUNTY completely harmless from damages to persons or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for -3- 00302 damages to the persons or property when and if said persons or property are passing through, are in or around said demised premises, and are not acting in conjunction with County business. 13. Destruction: If these premises or any essential part thereof be destroyed by fire, earth- quake, or other casualty, this lease shall , in the case of total or substantial des- trction, immediately terminate and, in case of partial destruction or damage, shall terminate at the option of either party on giving written notice to the other party within fifteen (15) days after such fire or casualty, and no rent shall accrue or be payable to LESSOR after such termination. Should COUNTY or LESSOR not elect to termi- nate said lease as provided in this paragraph, LESSOR shall forthwith repair the premises and, if such partial destruction shall prevent COUNTY from occupying the whole or a portion of the demised premises, COUNTY shall be entitled to a proportionate reduction of the said rent from the date of such partial destruction until the date the demised premises shall be repaired by LESSOR. 14. Quiet Enjoyment: LESSOR covenants that COUNTY shall at all times during the said term peace- ably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the demised premises without suit, trouble, or hindrance from or on account of LESSOR as long as COUNTY fully performs hereunder. 15. Defaults: In the event of COUNTY breach of any of the covenants or conditions herein, including rent payment, LESSOR may re-enter and repossess the premises and remove all persons and property therefrom; and in the event of such a breach by LESSOR, COUNTY may quit the premises without further obligation or may proceed to repair the building or correct the problem resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due the LESSOR. 16. Surrender of Premises: On the last day of the said term, COUNTY will peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except -4- 003u3 signs and fixtures referred to in Section 9 herein) in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by act of God, or by circumstances over which COUNTY has no control excepted. 17. Inspection: LESSOR reserves the right to enter the premises between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. , Monday through Friday, unless in an emergency situation, and to employ the proper representative to ensure that the property is being reasonably cared for, that no waste is being made, and that all things are done in the manner best calcu- lated for the preservation of the property, and in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this lease. 18. Successors, Assigns, Sub-Leases: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon. and inure to the benefit of the executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. of the respective parties hereto. 19. Time is the essence of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease. LESSEE LESSOR COUNTY ON COSTA B A. F. Bro, Jr. Chap an� �go rd f Su visors 1N, J. Bogge6i ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Thomas McGowan By. Deputy iJ " n B. Ogd RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: 71—i fy d A. Egan County Adfninistrator Deputy Public WoIrkt Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: Buildings & Grounds JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Real Property Agent By Deputy County Counsel -5- 00304 JAY _1 _ 01 . t i • L-4' cj to f i (j i F E If i 739 /. \AJA R S T, S C.,a. - 14 7-7-0, ...-0,Yii - ....... 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Agree- ment with Phoenix Programs, Inc. for Provision of Mental Health Services , Contract No. 24-751. On recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, and on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Phoenix Programs, Inc. for the provision of mental health ser- vices (residential rehabilitation services) during the period January 1, 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a cost not to exceed $37,000, under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Adm. Supervisors Contractor affixed this 21st day of January 1975 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M N. In aham 00306 CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRACT _OR PURCHASE OF SERVICES (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agenc )4 33 : i 1. Contract Identification. Number Department: Mental Health Services Subject: Mental health residential rehabilitation services 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa California, (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: Phoenix Programs, Inc. Capacity: California non-profit corporation Address: 3830 Clayton Road, Concord, CA 94521 3. Term: The effective date of this Contract is January 1, 1975 - and it terminates June 30. 1975 unless sooner terminated as Drovided herein. 4. Payment Limit: County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 37,000 5. County's Obligations: County shall make those payments to the Contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions: This Contract is subject to the General Conditions attached hereto and to the Special Conditions (if any) attached 'hereto, which are incor- porated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations: Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the "Service Plan." attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project: This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: 9. Legal Authority: This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Welfare and Institutions Code (Division 5, Part 2, The Short-Doyle Act), and California Administrative Code (Title 9, Subchapter 3, Community Mental Health Services under the Short-Doyle Act) 10. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OFjoNT COSTA, CA ORNIA CONTRACTOR BY � B Y airman, Boafd of S ervisors W. N. Begg s - Attest: Count Clerk J. R. OLSSON '�� • County (Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By Deputy State of California ) County of Contra Costa ) ss. Recommended by Human Resources Agency ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor f� known to me in those individual and By Designee business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ they signed it and that the corporation Form App ove l/Co my Counsel j or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws �- � or a resolution of its board of directors. By ��' i ��!✓ Deputy iv Dated: / 6 / 9 7•� ooF WIMAM71i P. CCC Standard Form ` M6364 5-74 PAYMENT PROVISIO14S Interim Payments Adjusted to Cost ' NUMBER 24 `raj► 51 1 . Interim Amount. Subject to the payment limit of this contract, County will pay Contractor 6,166 per month on an interim basis. 2. Cost of Services. Payment to the Contractor for services provided under the provisions ' of this contract shall be on the basis of the actual cost of services but County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the maximum specified payment limit of this contract. Actual cost small not include remodeling (except with prior State approval ) and/or equipment purchases as to any item which has a useful life in excess of two years and a value in excess of $100, except that part of such costs that can reasonably be charged to depreciation. 3. Cost Basis. Contractor's allowable actual costs for reimbursable expenditures will be subject to determination in accordance with United States Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-87, which shall be implemented by such of the following described documents as are applicable to the services provided under this contract: a. "OASC-5 A Guide for tion-Profit Institutions: Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare." b. "OASC-8 A Guide for Local Government Agencies: Establishing Cost Allocation Plans and Indirect Code Proposals for Grants and Contracts with the Federal Government. c. Other State of California or Federal guide for establishing indirect cost allocations, as may be required to meet the special needs of a contract program. 4. Payment. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly in the manner and form prescribed by the County (Demand Form D-15). Upon approval of each demand by the County Human Resources Director or his designee, County will make interim monthly payments at the rate specified above. 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor without recourse, when in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (�) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s). 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termi- nation of this contract, Contractor shall submit to the County a Cost Report in the form required by the County showing the actual allowable cost of services. If the cost report shows that the actual allowable cost of services for the term exceed interim payments, County will remit the difference to Contractor subject to the maximum specified in the payment limit. If the cost report shows that interim payments exceed the actual allow- able cost of services for the term, the Contractor shall refund the difference to the County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by State or County in addition to any certified audit required by the Service Plan. If the audit(s) show a difference between the actual cost of services and the interim payments made (including adjustments made pursuant to the Cost Report and Settlement provisions contained herein) then the procedure contained in the Cost Report and Settlement provisions to adjust payments to costs shall be followed. 8. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County the full amount of the County's liability, if any; to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions to the extent they are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agrement. OWNS Initials: tractor Department CCC Standard Form May 1974 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY N CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES General Conditions 24 - 751 NUMBER ............— .........ee" 1. Com2liance with Law: Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection: Contractor's performance, place of business and records are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records: Contractor shall keep and make available -for inspection by authorized. representatives of the County, the State of California, the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, and the United States General Accounting Office, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records as may be required by the county. 4. Retention of Records: The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the termination of the Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this contract. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to county, state or federal personnel. S. Termination: a. Written Notice: This Contract may be terminated by either party,, at their, sole discretion, upon thrity-day written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perforin: The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such'termination, the County may pro- ceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract, as the case may be. c. Cessation of Funding: In the event that funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement: This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures: Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be amendments to .his Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. Initials: CU tactor Lerartme-nt - 1 - i ` 5.1........�r NUMBER.......... �. p 8. Modifications and Amendments: This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. 9. Disputes: Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final deter- mination in writing by the Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency Director or his designee. 10. Law Governing Contract: This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations: Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County: Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract: The original copy of this Contract and of any amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment: The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work con- templated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. Such approval shall be attached and made a part of this Contract. This- Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status: This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest: Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing Board of Directors (or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of Board of Directors as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any Board of Directors of the Contractor shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Initials: CCAAractor Department 00310 . z 4 NUMBER •-- -- - 17. Confidentiality: Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employess to comply with the provisions of Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code and any other State or Federal statute or regulation respecting confidentiality to assure that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of any pro- vision of the Welfare and Institutions Code relating to any form of public social services will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be pub- lished or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally violating Section 10850 of the Welfare and Institutions Code is guilty of a misdemeanor. 18. Nondiscriminatory Services: Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with its operations or its services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance: During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as co-insured with limit of at least $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with satisfactory evidence of Insurance including a provision for thirty days written notice to County before cancellation or material change, evidencing the above- specified coverage. The Contractor also shall provide the County with a certi- ficate of insurance evidencing workmen's compensation insurance coverage for its employees. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance, as to the County, the State and Federal governments, its officers, agents, and employees, so that any other policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under said insurance. 21. Notices: All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Director of the Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. Initials: _ractor Depa tment CCC Standard Form M6371 May 1974 SERVICE PLAN 24 - 751 .. NUMBER I. Services arranged for or provided by Contractor shall meet the standards prescribed by the applicable statutes and administrative rules and regulations of the State of California and shall meet such standards as shall be prescribed by County through its Local Director of Mental Health Services. 2. The Contractor shall provide a facility which meets the construction, safety, sanitary, and other physical standards prescribed by the statutes and administrative regulations of the State of California and by the ordinances and regulations of local governmental agencies and entities. 3.- Records. The Contractor shall maintain and/or provide the following records which shall be available for inspection by County and California Department of Health: a. When treatment services are provided, individual medical records of the type prescribed by the County's Local Director of Mental Health for each County referred patient. This record shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, physical exam! nation record, Medication Order sheet, Progress Notes and Referral and/or Enrollment Form. b. Financial records, including balance sheet and operating statements, of an accepted standard type. c. Such supplementary records as are required by the County and/or the State of California for the purpose of claiming federal and/or state subventions. d. An annual audit by a Certified Public Accounting firm, verifying the Cost Report submitted under the Payment Provisions of this contract. 4. Funding. This contract, any extension hereof, and any change thereto shall be of no effect unless and until reviewed by the appropriate State or Federal Agency; and the State of California, the Federal Government, or private sources provide funds in support of the services to be provided hereunder. 5. Services. The services to be provided by Contractor are as follows: The Contractor will maintain a residential facility known as Phoenix House for twenty (20) persons, subject to Item 2 above, for the purpose of providing social rehabilita- tion to County-referred clients whom County has determined to be eligible for these services, pursuant to State regulations. Social rehabilitation is defined as including program activities and therapeutic services, both on an individual and-on' a group basis, that will provide each resident client with the living skills, social maturity, and independence necessary for reintegration into the normal social and vocational com- munities. The expected length of stay of each resident client in Phoenix House will be from one month to one year. Services to be provided are outlined as follows: I Program Activities: A) 24 hour per day staff coverage of the residential facility. B) Training and supervision in living skills such as: Meal preparation, housekeep- ing, gardening, residential maintenance, and personal hygiene. C) Supervision in the development of social skills such as taking part in group discussions, group planning, community activities and learning to respect the rights of others and take initiative for one's own plans and interests. D) Supervision in the development of a day program, outside the facility, between the hours of 10:00 a.m, and 3:00 p.m. Each client's program will be individually planned to meet his needs and skills and will include educational pursuits, work evaluation, work training and day treatment. Initials: 14 'r^ %'�� ' CoWactor Department vAIN v 312 SERVICE PLAN NUMBER 24 - 751 E) Continual liaison will be maintained with the County Mental Health Services, the Phoenix Skills and Activity Center, Many Hands, Re-Entry, Mt. Diablo Clinic, Concord Social Activities Center, Department of Vocational Rehabili- tation and other related agencies. F) Tutoring in academic subjects directly related to living and social skills, such as budgeting, will be provided, whenever possible. G) Counseling in vocational and prevocational skills such as the use of the tele- phone, public transportation, community resources. II Therapeutic Services: A) Crisis counseling as needed and available twenty-four (24) hours per day. B) Group sessions three (3) times per week. C) Separate men's and women's group meeting weekly to focus on sexual roles and social identity. D) Once a week group therapy session led by a consulting psychiatrist to focus on problem solving, relationships with others, etc. E) Once a week meeting of the staff. and residents to discuss program policies, problems occurring between persons in the residential community and general house business. F) Each resident will have a Counselor from among the staff who will counsel the resident once or twice weekly in individual sessions. III Evaluation data and procedures of the Phoenix House program in relationship to individual residents will be developed in conjunction with the Department of Research and Evaluation of the County Mental Health Service facility. IV A Unit of Service, for record keeping purposes, will be a residential day of service as defined herein for one eligible client. A day shall consist of twenty-four (24) hours of service, or at least twelve (12) hours of service on the day of admission or day service is terminated. Service for less than twelve (12) hours on the day of admission or the day of discharge shall be counted as one-half (1/2) unit. Initials: 1669tilactor Department t�Q313 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Lease with V. J. Bennett dba San Joaquin Yacht Harbor. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Supervisor W. N. Boggess, Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a two-year lease with V. J. Bennett, dba San Joaquin Yacht Harbor, for continued use of two covered boat berths to stare patrol boats of the Office of the County Sheriff, commencing January 13 1975, at a rental of $75 per month, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said lease. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P affixed this 21st day of January 197 County Sheriff—Coroner J. R. OLSSOM, Clerk County Administrator � ctiwty Auditor—Controller By Deputy Clerk H za 12/ a - N. In aham 00 14 LEASE BOAT BERTHS SAN JOAQUIN RIVER 1. Parties: Effective on January 21, 1975 V. J. BENNETT, dba SAN JOAQUIN YACHT HARBOR, hereinafter called "Lessor", and COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "County", mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Lease of Premises: Lessor, in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, hereby leases to County, and County hereby hires from Lessor, two (2) covered boat berths, forty (40) feet in length and assigned numbers 28 and 29 by San Joaquin Yacht Harbor, together with rights and ingress and egress thereto and therefrom. 3. Term: The term of this lease is for two (2) years commencing January 1, 1975 and ending December 31 , 1976. 4. Holding Over: Any holding over with Lessor's consent after the term of this lease, or any extension thereof, shall be construed to be a ten- ancy from month to month and shall otherwise be on the same terms and conditions, as for the original term of the lease. 5. Rental : County agrees to pay to Lessor as rent the monthly rental sum of $75.00 each month during County's occupancy, payable in advance on the first day of each and every month. Payments are to be sent to Lessor, c/o San Joaquin Yacht Harbor, Route 1, Box 566, Antioch, California 94509. 6. Use of Leased Premises: The premises shall be used during the term hereof for the operation of the County Sheriff's Department for the storage of two (2) patrol boats. 7. Utility Systems: Lessor shall furnish and maintain electricity, water, and other utilities furnished to other Lessees, and shall main- 090 3 15 ain-00315 Iain same in good working order but shall not Be: responsible for any maintenance required because of abnornnal or abusive. use. 8. Utilities and Janitorial Services: Lessor shall pay for _ said utilities. 9. Maintenance and Repairs: Lessor shall keep the enclosures of the berths in good order, condition and repair. . 10. Minor Alterations, Fixtures and Signs: County shall not . make any alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the premises without prior m ritten consent- of Lessor. 11. Hold Harmless: It is understood and agreed that Lessor shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises chile said persons are on County business, and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whomsoever while in or upon said premises during said term in conjunction with the performance of County business; and County hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harn- less Lessor from any liability or charges of any .kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said leased premises, except in the case of any structural, mechanical, or other failure of equipment or building owned by Lessor, which results in damage to any person or property, Lessor will be held liable. Lessor agrees to hold County completely harmless from damages to persons or property and County shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property when and if said persons or property are passing through or in or around said demised premises and are not acting in conjunction with County business. 12. Destruction: If these premises, or any essential part thereof, be destroyed by fire, earthquake, or other casualty, this lease shall, in the case of total or substantial destruction, immediately terminate and, in the event -of partial destruction or damage, shall tenninate at the option of either party on giving notice to the other party within fifteen (15) days after. such fire -2- NO316 u or -casualty, and no reizt shall accrue or be- payable to Lessor after such termination. Should County or Lessor not elect to to urinate said lease, as provided in 'this paragraph. Lessor shall forthoith repair the premises -nd, if such partial destruction shall prevent County from occupying t-he whole or a portion of the .de-raised premises, County shall be entitled to a proportionate reduction of the said rent from the date of such partial destruction until the date the demised premises shall be repaired by Lessor. 13. Def=aults: In the event of County breach of any of the covenants or conditions herein, incl.udi•n- rent payment, Lessor may re-enter and repossess the premises and remove all persons and property therefrom; and in the event of such a breach by Lessor, County may quit the premises without further obligation or, with Lessor's written consent and authorization, may proceed to repair the premises or correct the problem .resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due Lessor. 14. Surrender of Premises: Or_ the last day of the said term, or soo-aei tF rrainatioa of this lease, County will peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to Lessor these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by act of God, or by circumstances over which County has no control excepted. 15. Successors, Assigns, Sub-Leases: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto; but without Lessor's written consent'. County shall not assign this lease nor sublet all or any part of these premises nor permit the use thereof by anyone other than County, such sublessees, and their officers, agents and employees, although Lessor may assign this lease- z-,i.thout further consent {ror, County. w (SLS: PAG -4- Foil: S13,AHTURES) --3- WA31'7 LESSEE LESSOR COUNTY OF CONTRA TA SAN JOAQUIN YACHT HARBOR By �! aTmAt Board o upors V. J,l Bennett Boggess ATTEST: JAMES R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Real Property Agent County Administrator APPROVED AS TO FORM: J. B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Deputy County Counsel WAP:cl - 4 - 00318 1 f In the Board of Supervisors . of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 In the Matter of Submission of entries in the NACO 1974-1975 County Achieve- ment Award Program. The Board having been requested to authorize submission of the following three entries in the National Association of Counties (NACO) 1974-1975 New County Achievement Awards Program: 1. Multi-Agency Focus on the Preschool Child, 2. Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Project, 3. Blind Adolescent Life Skills Center; and The Board having been subsequently requested to also approve submission of an entry entitled "Drug Education Center Program and Development," said entry to be either in addition to or in the place of one of the three above-mentioned programs; and On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid requests are APPROVED and the County Administrator is AUTHORIZED to arrange for submission of said entries. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: National Association of Supervisors Counties c/o County Administrator mixed this 21st day of January 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Superintendent of Schools By .� Deputy Clerk H 23 ,2/74)i tor, Human Resources N. IngAaham. Agency County Auditor-Controller County Treasurer-Tax Collector 00319 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 In the Matter of Authorizing Special Board and Care Rate for Michael Lisby. On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, and on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that authoriza- tion is GRANTED for payment of a special board and care rate of $475 per month, effective January 22, 1975, to Mrs. Nanette Gerstle, 9 Roosevelt Circle, Palo Alto, California for the care of Michael Lisby, a dependent child of the court. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Supervisors Social Service - L. Jacobsaffixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By � Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15•M N. Ing aham 00320 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 75. In the Matter of Authorizing submission of revised grant application to California Office on Aging for the Nutrition Project for the Elderly. As recommended by Mr. R. E. Jornlin, Director, Human Resources Agency, and on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Jornlin is AUTHORIZED to submit a revised grant appli- cation to the California 6ffice on Aging in the amount of $153,768 for the second year funding (February 1, 1975 through January 31, 1976) of the Nutrition Project for the Elderly. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P . Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director, Human Supervisors Resources Agency 21st January County Auditor- affixed this day of , 19 75 Controller I R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By _ ug , Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15•M R6bbie Gu ierrez 00321 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 In the Matter of Development of Area Agency on Aging. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Human Resources Agency is designated as the public entity in this county with which the State Office on Aging shall work in the development of an Area Agency on Aging within Contra Costa County. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • Agency Supervisors Attn: Council on Aging affixed this 21st day of January 19 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel De utYClerk BY H 24 12/74 - 15•M Max ne M. Neufel 003V i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 1975 In the Matter of Authorizing Suit to Recover Costs Due Contra Costa County IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that legal action be initiated in the Small Claims Court by the Auditor-Controller's Office against the following persons to recover the cost owed Contra Costa County: Larry R. Smith (Buchanan) 118.07 PASSED AND ADOPTED on January 21, 1975 by the following votes: Supervisors: AYES NOES ABSENT A. M. Dias ( X ) ( ) ( ) J. P. Kenny ( X ) ( ) ( ) E. A. Linscheid ( X ) ( ) ( ) J. E. Moriarty ( X ) ( ) ( ) W. N. Boggess ( X ) ( ) ( } I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Administrator Supervisors Auditor affixed this 21st day of January19 'jam Board of Supervisors County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15•M N. In aham NGM/amw 00323 11.._ r C c MEMOIR In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 '75 In the Matter of Approving Tentative 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System Plan_ for the County of Contra Costa. The Board on June 18, 1974 having established an Emergency Telephone System Planning Committee comprised of representatives from the county, cities, special districts, and other agencies operating in Contra Costa County that are involved in emergency telephone communications; and The Board having received a memorandum from the County Administrator advising that the aforesaid committee has developed a tentative plan for emergency telephone systems that would meet the legal deadline (January 31, 1975) pursuant to Government Code Sections 53100 through 53120; that all agencies involved within the county have endorsed the countywide tentative plan; and that this basic agreement will lead to countywide cooperation with all public safety agencies in meeting further requirements in developing a final plan by January 31, 1977 as established in the aforementioned code sections; and The County Administrator having submitted and requested Board approval of the Tentative 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System Plan for the County of Contra Costa, as recommended by the Committee, and also having requested that the Clerk of the Board be authorized to file copies of said plan with the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and the State of California, General Services Department, Communications Division; and On motion of Supervisor J. --E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid tentative plan is APPROVED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file copies of same as set forth above. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Tinscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Super:Tsars on the date aforesaid. cc• All Members of 9-1-1 Cte. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 40 Participating Agencies Supervisors County Departments affixed this 21st day of January . 19 Human Resources Agency Sheriff Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk -Public Works By Deputy Clerk H za 12/74Aud4+tor-Controller A. Jdsep Office of Emergency Services f County Administrator Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. State of California, General Services Dept. , Communications Division OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building W. N. Boggess Martinez, California J. P. Kenny To: A. M. Dias Date: January 17, 1975 J. E. Moriarty E. A. Linscheid From: Arthur G. Will, Subject: Emergency Telephone System County Administrator Plan (9-1_ Your Board established an Emergency Telephone System Planning Committee on June 18, 1974 naming representatives from the County, Cities, Special Districts, and other agencies operating in Contra Costa County that are involved in emergency telephone communications. This committee established regular meetings to discuss the development of a "tentative plan" for emergency telephone systems that would meet the legal deadline of January 31, 1975 pursuant to Government Code Section 53100 through Section 53120. The "tentative plan" has been completed and all agencies within Contra Costa County involved in this service area have endorsed the Countywide tentative plan. This basic agreement will lead to Countywide cooperation with all public safety agencies in meeting further requirements in developing a final plan by January 31, 1977 as established in the aforementioned code sections. Your Board is requested to officially approve the tentative plan which is attached to this communication and authorize the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit copies of the Contra Costa County Tentative Plan to the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company and the Communications Division of the State Department of General Services. I would like to emphasize that all o.f the public safety answering agencies in Contra Costa County provided excellent cooperation in development of this tentative plan and we look forward to a continued relationship with them in the two years as we work to develop the final plan for emergency telephone system (9-1-1). TW/aa encl. TENTATIVE 9-1-1 E1,1£RGFNCY TELEPHONE SYSTE 1 PL? FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1. Legislative Reauirements Pursuant to Article 6, Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (Sections 53100 through 53120), a tentative plan for a 9-1-1 emergency telephone systeri has been prepared and is hereby submitted in conformance with the above cited code sections. 2. Scope of 9-1-1 System A. Member Agencies - The member agencies are listed on the attached Exhi it A to t;iis tentative plan, and they include the County Government, all fire districts, all police departments and police agencies, all special districts and agencies, the California Highway Patrol and all other local, State and Federal agencies involved in providing services connected with operation of emergency telephone system services (9-1-1) in the County of Contra Costa. B. Management of System - The member' agencies shall deter- mine sites for three ) suDregional centers which shall be the Public' Safety Answering Points (PSAP's) for all emergency tele- phone com=.unications and it is the intent or the above named agencies to develoD suitable management structuresand financing of these three (3) subregional PSAP's to conduct ail necessary operations to assure complete compliance with the aforementioned law. The member agencies agree to study other alternative methods of meeting 9-1-1 requirements, including centralized basic, decentralized basic, and selective routing methods. C. GeograDhic Area to be Covered - The area covered will include a1 0" Ene County o_ Contra osta including unincorpor- ated and incorporated areas. Provisions will be made to provide plans to' accoLi-todate inter-county emergency telephone problems. D. Responsibility for Handlinz 9-1-1 Problems - Respon- sibility for na:2ciinz- 9-1-1 proDiEMS 1s t0 Dc eece-tined as a result of the joint eTrOrt to be conducted by the member agencies outlined in 2. .A_ of this document and such responsibilities will be decided through joint effort of the responsible agencies. These determinations will be reached on, or prior to the deadline for submission of the final plan (currently established on January 31, 1977) . 2. 3. System Configuration A. Systems Desi--n - The systems design is to be determined through joint ettort with all participating agencies in Contra Costa County. Tentatively three (3) subregional centers will be established in West, Central and East Contra Costa County to receive all 9-1-1 communications; however, alternative methods will be studied as outlined in Section 2. B.' of this plan. B. Methods of Response - The Contra Costa County system will utilize a i four methods of response as defined in the Government Code. All calls will be handled by a 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). The method of handling communica- tions will be as follows: Direct Dispatch - When a call is received in* one of the three subregional centers requiring emergency response it may be made directly from the 9-1-1 emergency receiving center, or Relay Dispatch - When a call is received in one of the three �3 subregional centers requiring emergency response it may be relayed to the proper public safety agency for action, or Transfer - When a call is received in one of the three su regional centers requiring emergency response it may be transferred to the appropriate public safety agency for their action. The complaint operator will monitor transfer of the communication until satisfied that the complaint is being handled by the proper agency, or Referral - When a call is received that cannot be Handled bv one of the above methods the subregional center operator will refer the caller to the telephone number of the agency he is seeking. The caller will then have to reinitiate his call to the proper agency. C. Equipment C}nder Consideration - The equipment being considered will, provide routing of calls to subregional centers. Specific equipment has not been chosen, but will provide routing from the telephone exchange areas in Contra Costa County to the three (3) subregional centers as follows: 3, West Contra Costa County Subregional Center Rodeo Telephone Exchange Pinole Telephone Exchange Richmond Telephone Exchange Crockett Telephone Exchange East Bay Telephone Exchange (selectively -routed) Central Contra Costa County Subregional Center Martinez Telephone Exchange Orinda Telephone Exchange Moraga Telephone Exchange Lafayette Telephone Exchange Walnut -Creek Telephone Exchange Concord Telephone Exchange Danville Telephone Exchange Pleasanton Telephone Exchange (selectively routed) East Contra Costa County Subregional Center Pittsburg Telephone Exchange Antioch Telephone Exchange East Contra Costa County Telephone Exchange Livermore Telephone Exchange (selectively routed) D. Conformance with Technical Standards - The County of Contra Costa will comply with a!l State technxcal standards for the overall operation of the 9-1-1 system. 4. Operational Aspects of 9-1-1 A. Compliance with Minimum Operational Standards - The County of Contra Costa t•:1!i comply with the minimum operational standards established by the State of California. The present plans are tentative and details are to be worked out in cooperation with all agencies in Contra Costa County; however, details will be documented in the final plans as required by the State of California. B. Procedures for Handling Calls - All 9-1-1 calls for the County of Contra Costa will be muted to the. appropriate 9-1-1 subregional center. An emergency response operator shall deter- mine the nature of the emergency, the exact location of the incident, the responsible public agency and shall take the appropriate action to route the communication to the responsible agency usin� one of the four (4) means discussed under "Methods of Response (Section 3. B.) OOM 4. C. Alameda County Calls - All calls emanating in exchanges which overlap in AlamedaCETity will be routed through the tele- phone exchange office in Alameda County because Alameda County 3 has chosen the "Selective Routing Method" throughout the County. Automated telephone equipment in Alameda County will be used to determine the point of origin of each call and will route the call to the PSAP to be determined responsible for the area in which the call originated. D. San Joaauin Counts Calls. East Contra Costa County Telephone Exchange l E) is the one common exchange between Contra Costa County and San Joaquin County. All calls emanating in this exchange will be routed to the East Contra Costa County subregional center and the procedure outlined in Section 4. B. will be followed. Calls which emanate in San Joaquin County and are in the ECCCTE will be transferred to the appropriate PSAP in San Joaquin County to be located in Stockton or Tracy. E. Training for Operators. A detailed plan will be developed in cooperation wizn all participating agencies for training complaint operators and dispatchers- in telephone operations, automated call distribution, telephone equipment operation, dispatch operation and other related personnel activities. F. Record ReepinQ Procedures - Plans will be made to assure all required records as determined by the State -of California will be kept and systems will be developed to meet local needs in order to assure efficiency of operations, to measure staffing and equip- ment requirements, to evaluate overall service to the citizens and to provide all legal, cost and fiscal information deemed necessary. 5. Schedule A schedule of tasks required to implement the 9-1-1 system. will be developed and planning personnel committed as part of the Final Plan requirements. 6. Legal Requirements Plans will be developed to implement necessary agreements for joint exercise of powers, agreements between public agencies and providers of service and copies will be provided to the State of California as mandated. 00M" 5. - 7. Publicitv - The County of Contra Costa and other participating agencies wit conduct necessary publicity programs to inform the . citizens of the 9-1-1 program. Such publicity will include news- papers, television, radio and other appropriate means. 8. Cost Information and Statistics - The State Department of ' . General Services has proviced the following statistics and costf estimates to develop two (2) subregional centers in Contra Costa County which estimates will be revised at a •later date to more properly reflect the three (3) subregional center concept as contained in this plan: Population 590, 100 PSAP's 2 r Monthly Equipment Costs $4,589 Monthly Personnel Costs (operate PSAP's) $309024 Monthly Supply Costs $3,002 Monthly Rent of Space $202 Total Monthly Costs •$37,817 Annual Operating Costs $453,804 Monthly per Capita Cost $.06 Installation Cost $9,795 Total First Year Cost $463,599 All cost estimates are based on 1974 data, personnel, equipment and other prices. i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meeting. On recommendation of the County Administrator, and on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Robert J. Dornan, Business Services Assistant, and Mr. Al Barba, Equipment Mechanic, Public Works Department, are AUTHORIZED to attend, at county expense, the 24th Annual Motor Vehicle Maintenance Conference in Seattle, Washington during the period March 23, 1975 through March 27, 1975. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order.entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea{ of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21st day of January 19.E County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M N. In aham VV 31 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California January 21 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meeting. On recommendation of the County Administrator, and on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. William A. Garrison, Materials Testing Engineer, and Mr. Gerald Evans, Assistant Materials Testing Engineer, Public Works Department, are AUTHO- RIZED to attend, at county expense, the Ninth Annual Nevada Street and Highway Conference in Reno, Nevada during the period March 12, 1975 through March 14, 1975. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote:. AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 21st day of January , 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OISSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M N. In aham 0032 _ And the Board adjourns to meet on 2 at 0 /0t f, in the Board Chambers, Room 07, Agin stration. Building, ti_artinez, California. W. N. Rogge .s, ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLEF'S{ De ut WOO s SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS BE-PORE THEE BOY.RD OF SUPERVISORS OF CON-19A COSTA COUNTY, JANUARY 21, 1975, PREPARED BY-j. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK A11D -:-M-OFFICIO CLER-K OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for Health Department, Public Works, Probation Department, Sheriff-Coroner, San Pablo Fire Protection District, Walnut.Creek Danville Municipal Court, west Municipal Court. Approved appropriation adjustment for Medical Services; and internal adjust- ments not affecting totals for Public Works, Probation, County Counsel, Social Service. Authorized persons indicated to attend the following: Messrs. William A. Garrison and Gerald Evans, Public Works annual Nevada Street and Highway Conference, Reno, Nevada, March 12-14; I•Iessrs . R. J. Dornan and Al Barba, Public Works - Annual Motor Vehicle Maintenance Conference, Seattle, Washington, March 23-27. Approved tentative 9-1-1 arergency Telephone System Plan for the County of Contra Costa. Fixed payment amounts for election officers and rental of polling places for elections in 1975• Initiated legal action against Mr. Larry R. Smith to recover costs owed , county in amount of $118-07. Denied claim for damages in behalf of Hose7rari de la Torre, $1,000,000. Designated the human Resources Agency as the public entity in this county with which the State Office on Aging shall work in the development of an Area Agency= on Aging. Authorized ALr. R.' E. Jornlin, Director, human Resources Agency, to submit .a revised grant application to the Califcrnia Office on Aging in the amount of $153,765 for the second year funding (February 1, 1975 through January 31, 1976) of the Nutrition Project for the Elderly. Granted author_zation for special board and care rate in the amount of .$475, per month, effective January 22, 1975, to Mrs. N. Gerstle, Palo Alto, for care of a dependant child of the court. Approved request of the Concord Corramunity Forum for representation on Contra Costa County Trsnsportation Advisory Committee and appointed Mr. Dwight 0. Thomas thereto. Appointed Mr. Ben. H. Galvin, Clayton, California as member of the Board of Commissioners of the Eastern Fire Prosection District of Centra Costa County to' fill the unexpired term of Mr. Frank S. Arata, ending December 31, 1976. Received quotations for furnishing collection services to the county and : referred same to County Administrator and County Audi.tor for report; and in connection therewith referred to the aforesaid and County Counsel a quotation not timely received. Authorized provision of legal defense for Dr. Sheldon Sperber inconnection with Case No. 143517, Jessie P. Nelson vs. Contra Costa County, reserving the right of the county to withdraw authorization if it is determined that Dr. Sperber is not a county employed. Approved request of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee for authorization to negotiate a contract with the firm of Metcalf and Eddy Engineers for the development of a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management: Plan for the County. �jc, . L 0©�34 t - January 21, 1975 Summary, continued Page 2 Endorsed national carpooling effort of U.S. Department of Transportation. Authorized County Administrator to arrange for submission of certain entries in the National Association of Cou:ities 19711-1975 New County Achievement Awards Program. Authorized Chairman to execute documents as indicated with following: Boyd P. Wilson, a Deferred Improvement Agreenent providing for street and drainage improvements on Verde Avenue, Road No. 056514, ,forth Richmond area, Land Use Permit 196-71 * Empire Residential Investors, Deferred Improvement Agreement, Minor Sub division 1-74, Pacheco Aran; V. J. Bennett, dba Sar. Joaquin Yacht Harbor, lease for two years for con- tinued use of two covered boat berths to store patrol boats of the Office of County Sheriff, commencing January 1, 1975 at $75 per month; Phoenix Pro;rams, Inc, agreement fo^ provision of mental health services (residential rehabilitation services) during the period January 1, 1975 through June 30, 1975 at a cost not to exceed $37,000; F.r. A. F. Bray, Jr. , lease of premises at 739 Ward Street, Martinez, for use by the Conservatorship Unit of the Office of County Counsel for one year, com mencing February 1, 1975; United Truck Driving School of Northern California and Olsen Electro-Surgical Instruments, Inc., agreements for on-the-job training services for eligible par- ticipnnts to be funded by the Comprehensive anployment and gaining Act of 1973; Title I, through Jure 30, 1975; Brentwood Health Center Committce, Inc., Memorandum of Lease forrecord9.ng in lieu_ of original lease for promises at 118 Oak Street, Brentwood, for occupancy by the County Health Department:; Contra Cosh County r.ster District, a rE:emont for use, of premises at 2700 Concord Lvt-nue, Concord, for office of auec-.rvisor of District 1V from, Jan- nary 1, 1975 through Decenber• 31, 1977 at a monthly rental of $175; Apollo —Enterprises, amendment to lease for reimbursement of leasehold improvements in the amount of $353; Regional Office, Office of Economic Opportunity, grant accepting funds for operation of Community Action Program, first quarter of 1975 program year $298,127 ($236,500 federal share and X59,625 local share ); NLD. John A. Angi, agreement extension to .fovenber 26, 1975 for installation and completion of public improvements in Minor Subdivision 292-72, Concord area; Ms. Sandra Bennett, agreement for construction of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 100-714, Alamo area. Acknowledged receipt of the following: Letter from Ms. A. Johnson, Fresident, League of Women Voters of Diablo. Valley, coneurrirf; t-:ith goals and objectives set for the 1975 calendar year and stating the League's position on current state and national issues; Letter from fir. J. Houlihan, xecutive Secretary, Mayors' Conference, stating that the members were equally divided on the question of requiring gasoline station operators to post on their property the price of motor vehicle fuels and they do not intend to proceed further; Final Environmental Impact Report for Oak Road Extension (Las Juntas to Coggins Lane), Pleasant hill area, from Public Works Director, Status report from Public :forks Director on ,`forth Richmond Bypass Project, North Richmond area. Approved the proposal of the City of Walnut Creek to proceed with negoti- ations for its purchase of the Cortese Land Company property in connection with the Parks and Open Space Program, County Service Area R-8. Authorized acceptance of deed for county purposes (Juvenile Hall Property) for a small parcel of State surplus land (262 square feet) at the southeasterly inter- section of South Frontage Road to State Highway Route !f and Glacier Drive Mtz. Approved Work Order 4143 and authorized Public Works Director to arrange for the California Department of Transportation to review plans and specifications for the proposed Oak Road Extension project. lit - January 21, 1975 Summary, continued Page 3 Accepted instrument entitled Offer of Dedication dated December 2, 1974 from Willism J. Hayes et ux for recording only, Oak Glen Court, Alamo area. Granted extension of tinic to January 8, 1976 for final filing date of final map of Subdivision 45,42, I•Iaa,•t.inez area, to i:r. F. Hightower. Approved a two-day extension of time for road closure of Freitas, Road, Danville area, through January 15, 1975. Accepted Grant of Easement for road and drainage purposes (portion of State Hi,;hway 4) from Southern Pacific Transportation Company and authorized Chairman to execute said grant. Authorized Fublic forks Director to publish a Notice- of Opportunity for a. Public Hearing on the proposed Northgate Road Reconstruction project. Accepted as complete construction of improvementus to Kay Avenue and in con- nection onnection there:ai li approved deferred imProvernent arTr•esmsnt :with Y. and H. Lindsp;; for i.inor Subdivision 45-7t;, Oakley area. Approved plans and specifications and awarded contract to Chas. I. Cun-ninghan Company in amount of $9,959.25 for county-wide inlet grate modification. Authorized payment of %00 to Vernon Rouner et al for property acquisition_in_ connection with Iiillcrest Avenue, Antioch area. Declared that improvements have been maintai.nod for one year in Subdivision 4233, ?'ieasn rf si l?. rtirea and nuthorized refund ref $500 deposit to morgan Develop- men:., Inc, relat:cO thereto. Granted 30-dny extension on proposed abatement of property located at 21.34 Birch Street, Martinez area, subject to certain conditions, and continued to February 18 at 10:40 a.m. hearing related thereto. Referred to: Administration and Finance Corrnittee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Henny)for review and recommend:.tion - ma t ter of liquidated damages for construction of harsh Creek Road Box Culvert, Clayton area; County Admilnistratcrfor analysis and report - m atter of Assembly Bill 280, which would revise the organization of the Bay Area Air Pollu- tion Control District; Governmont Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Morinrty) for review* - proposed Statewide Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program; County Administrator to answer - letter received from Mr. T. J. Plelson, Lafayette, with respect to preservation of agricultural lands. Acknowledged receipt of letter from Mrs. Willinm Rogan, Antioch, regarding- the welfare system and referred same to Director, human Resources Agency. Acknowledged receipt of resolution of the Planning Commission and approved its recomnendntion that the request of the San Radion Valley Ganeral Plan Review _ Committee for interim growth controls not be granted. Acknowledged receipt of report from Chairman, Emergency Medical Care Committe% with respect to Contra Costa County Ambulance Association proposal. for certain changes in regulations, rates, and services and referred same to County Administrator for review. Deferred action on memorandum report of Acting Director of Personnel with respect to potential layoff of six San Pablo Fire Protection• District employees and offering said employees the opportunity for transfer to the River Fire Fro tection District; and referred said matter to Government Operations Cournittee. : January 21, 1975 Summary, continued Page Referred to: Director, Human Resources Agency for review - letters from Social Services Union, Local 535, AFL-CIO, urging support of State Legislative measures S3 283, AB 2414. and Congressional measure S 4119, relative to funding; of social services; Agricultural Commissioner for review - letter from Mrs. B. Hall, Walnut Creek, suggesting changes in animal control policies; County Auditor - letter from Mr. R. W. Hunter, Cooperative Center Federal Credit Union, B3rkeley, requesting; termination of its agreement for distribution of food stamps, effective February 28, 1975; Fir. J. T. Ritch, Secretary, American Revolution Bicentennial Committee, Martinez - letter from Dr. Irene Won requesting permission to serve on the Amer= ican Revolution Bicentennial Committee of Contra Costa County as a representative of Pittsburg; Employee Relations Officer - letter from Social Service Unit 1G1, Pleasant Hill, urging the Board to approve for county employees State disability benefits indicated to be available under rending legislation; County Administrator - letter from Senator John A. Nejedly regarding plan to guide the uses of the resources of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Cohnmi.ttee that matter of county ordinance governing public health licenses and fees be removed as a - com mittee referral with understanding that County Administrator in conjunction with Acting County Health Officer will review matter further during coming year and report to Board.; and that in vie:a of foregoing the Special Committee heretofore established to study said licenses and fees be dissolved. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Committee in connec- tion with continuation of financirje for certain programs operating under Short- Dayle fund, including; (a) Extension of conte::-:t with County Superintrhndant of Schools (Drug Education Center) throu4l' June 30, 1975, and augn n ration of same by a total of $36,254 with understanding that no additional counts funds are needed; (b) Extension of contract with Pittsburg Community Hospital District (Los Medanos House) throu-h Jure 30, 1975; (c ) Retention in said committee request from Human Resources Paency for augmentation of contracts with El Sobrante Activity Center and Los Medanos House; and (d ) Denial all other requests for funds for drug abusa programs. Approved recommendation of Planning Commission to rezone certain land in the Alamo area (1940-RZ) to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20), R. Stunner, ct al, owners. Continued to July 22, 1975,11 a.m., hearins- on Planning Commission's recom- mendation with respect to request of R. Ortiz (1728-RZ) to rezone certain land in Brentwood area to Light Industrial District (L-I) and for siteplan approval (L.U.P. No. 75-73) to expand existing auto wrecking yard. Continued to Febi-uary 2!T, 1975 at 8 p.m. hearing on application of Industrial Tank, Inc. (L.U.P. 377-73) to establish a Class I disposal site, Brentwood' area. Fixed February 11 at 11:05 a.m. as time for hearing in respect to Planning Commission's recommendation on proposed amendment to the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County (Section 8212.004) pertaining to regulations for public lands. Fixed February 11 at 11:10 a.m. as time for hearing on proposed amendment to the Recreation Element of the County General Plan, CSA R-8, Walnut Creek area. Adopted following numbered resolutions: 75/30, fixing 7iarch 4, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. for hearing on proposed abandonment of Drainage Easement, Lots 6-and 7, Subd. 4234, Pleasant Hill area; 75/59, as EX-Officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and 'plater Conservation District, declaringits intention to sell certain excess District property, Rodeo Creek Channel area, at public auction on March 1 at 11 a.m.; January 21, 1975 Summary, continued Page 5 75/60, fixing March 4, 10:30 a.m., for hearing of proposed abandonment of utility reservation in portion of Amend Road, F.'1 Sobrante area; 75/61, accepting as complete construction of Canyon Road Widening project from San Leandro Creek to Country Club Drive, Moraga area, 0. C. Jones and Sons; - 75/62, accepting as complete construction of improvements in Subdivision 4275, Alamo area; retaining surety cash deposit for one year; and accepting Pebble Drive as County road; 75/63, approving plans and specifications for Contra Costa County Fire Pro- tection District Administration Building, Pleasant Hill area, and fixing February 18, 11 a.m., as date to receive bids thereon (asEx-Officio the governing board of said district); 75/64, authorizing County Auditor to make certain changes on the assessment roll; 75/65, authorizing execution of Satisfaction of Lien against property of Louise Wilks; 75/66, authorizing sale of improvement bonds to Stone and Youngberg in con- nection with Assessment District No. 1973-3 (Bishop Ranch), San Ramon area; 75/67, amendin Resolution No. 74/573, to increase rates to be paid to the following child care institutions effective .January 1, 1975: Community of Concern, Clearwater Ranch, Clearwater Ranch (group home), and New Morning Home for Girls; 75/68, as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the County Flood Control and k►ater Conservation District, authorizing District staff to prepare Ebgineer's report recommending that the Investment Street storm drain project be adopted as a supplement to the Flood Control Subzone 8A plan. Approved Notice of Termination with respect to architectural services for the Sheriff's Rehabilitation Center and direct the Public Works Department to transmit the Notice of Termination to Dennis & Cochrane, Inc., Project Arabi- tett, and to obtain from Dennis & Cochrnnfs the original tracings, sketchea, calculations and all other pertinent information prepared by the Architect. Authorized County Auditor to cancel uncollected penalty and interest on assessment reduced by Assessment Appeals Board/Officer. The preceding documents consist of 338 pages.