HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09101985 - T.10 T.10
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on September 10, 1985 , by the following vote:.
AYES: Supervisors Powers, McPeak, Torlakson and Fanden
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder
ABSTAIN: None-
SUBJECT: Appeal from San Ramon Valley Planning Commission denial of
appeal on Condition 11(a) imposed by the Zoning Administrator in
approving application for minor subdivision MS 70-84.
The Board on June 25 , 1985 continued to this date and time
its hearing on the appeal of N. H. Anderson and E. H. Overholtzer
(applicants and owners) from the decision of the San Ramon Valley
Area Planning Commission denying their appeal on Condition 11(a) of
the conditions imposed by the Zoning Administrator in approving
their application for a minor subdivision dividing a 2.30 acre par-
cel into three lots (MS 70-84 ) , said property being located on the
easterly side of Ersilia Trail, approximately 800 feet north of
Bunce Meadow Drive in the Alamo area; and
Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Community
Development, described the project and advised that a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significance had been posted, and
advised that the appellant is requesting waiver of drainage require-
ments (collect and convey) as imposed on MS 70-84 in Condition lla
and that the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission had decided
that any waiver of the collect and convey requirements must be
determined at the Board of Supervisors level, and therefore the
the Commission denied the appeal.
Stephen Anderson, 2845 Miranda Avenue, Alamo advised that
he was representing the neighbors and adjacent property owners and
commented on the continuing drainage problems in the area that recur
with the winter rains and urged the Board to continue to enforce its
current drainage requirements and work to solve the drainage
problems prior to or in conjunction with the proposed minor sub-
division.
. Chairman Fanden noted that the minor subdivision is in
Supervisorial District III and suggested continuing the hearing
until Supervisor Schroder is present.
Supervisor Powers commented that he would like to have a
list of all the options there are to take care of drainage for the
subject area, including the impact the Bogue Ranch may have.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid hearing is
continued to October 8, 1985 at 2:30 p.m.
1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correcteopyof
an action taken and ortered an the minutes of the
Board of Suporviso on the date shown.
ATTESTED:
PHIL BATCH aa,Cf^rk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By .Deputy
cc: Applicant
Community Development
County Counsel