Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12161975 - R 75J IN 2 1975 D ECEM ERf TUESDAY t i i r 3 E 1 i S . k s - t THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24--2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.M., TUESDAY, DECEMBER' l6, 19M5' IN ROOM 107, COUNTY 'ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman W. N. Boggess, Presiding;, Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. 14Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine. , Russell, Deputy Clerk. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County.''Admiriistratar and Public Works Director. j.. ya t t 4 S. 'S 7 1 } i t JAMES P. KENNY.RlcHmato CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICT CHAIRMA14 ALFRED RIAS,SAN•wBLo JAMES P. KENNY 2ND DISTRICT CONTRACOSTACOTVTY VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E. MORIARTY.LAFAYETTE JAMES R.OLSSON,ccuNTY CLERK 3RD DISTRICT AND FOR ANO EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONcoRD SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A. UNCCHE90, y Tinto BOARD CHAMBERS. ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING STN DISTRICT' P.O. BOX 911 MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 �v? F{gtv_, �I^tv Te!epFione TUESDAY A�urn='=r 37< .2371 DECIMM 16, 1975 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board," 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Human Resources Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and A. M. Dias) on submittal of a Letter of Intent to the State Department of Health with respect to distribution of food vouchers under the :Women's, Infants and Children's Nutrition Program. 9:45 A.M. Service pin awards. 10:30 A.M. Continued hearing on proposed abandonment of portions of Warner and Del Porto Roads, Oakley area. Planning Commission recommends approval of abandonment of Warner but continued indefinitely its hearing on Del Porto. It is suggested that the hearing on the latter be continued to December 14, 1976. 10:35 A.M. Representatives of Contra Costa County Retired Employees Association. Chapter will request a cost of living increase for retired county employees for the 1976-1977 fiscal year. 10:45 A.M. Hearings on the following proposed annexations: 75-11 (Sycamore Square Shopping Center and Subdivision 4406), Danville area, to County Service Area L-45; Oak Knoll Road, El Sobrante area, to County Service Area L-41; and Allview, Pinole area, to County Service Area LIB-10. 10:50 A.M. Decision on appeal of Mr. James C. Halverson from condition imposed by Planning Commission in connection with the approval of the final map for Subdivision 4610, Danville area (hearing closed December 2). 11:00 A.M. Receive bids for construction of storage addition to Edgar Children's Shelter, Glacier Drive, Martinez. 11:00 A.M. As ex officio the Governing Body of Contra Costa County Flood Control and :rater Conservation District receive proposals and auction bids for the purchase of property located at the northeast corner of Oak Grove Road and Ygnacio Valley Road, Walnut Creek area. 11:15 A.M. Hearing on proposal to name as Coggins Drive an existing portion of Coggins Lane and a new portion of roadway presently mown as Oak Road -'-bctension, Pleasant Hill area. QOM F Board of Supervisors" Calendar, continued December 16, 1975 11:20 A.M. Presentation by representative of the Bay Area Council on financing public transit. 2:00 P.M. Hearing on appeal of Phoenix Properties, Inc. from Board of Appeals denial of Application No. 2003-75 for approval of site plan and elevations with certain variances, Orinda area (continued from December 2). 2:30 P.M. Decision on administrative appeal of Mr. M. M. Levine from actions of Planning Department with respect to Land Use Permit No. 2010-75, Shell Service Station, Stanley Boulevard, Lafayette area (hearing closed December 9). 2:35 P.M. Hearing on recommendation of Planning Commission with respect to proposed Seismic Safety Element of the County General Plan (continued from December 9). ITRIS SUR4ITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 10: CONSENT 1. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll; cancellation of tax liens; correction of erroneous assessments; and rescission of Resolution No. 75/832 relating to transfer of tax lien to unsecured roll, as recommended by the County Auditor. 2. ACCEPT Deed of Development Rights required as a condition of Land Use Permit 2055-74, Danville area. 3. FIX January 13, 1976 at the times indicated for hearings on the following proposals to rezone land: 10:45 a.m. - Planning Commission recommendations (1968-RZ) Alamo area, and (1972-RZ), Orinda area; and 10:50 a.m. - John :feightman (1914-RZ), San Ramon area. 4. AUTHORIZE extension of time in which to file final map of Subdivision 4659, Danville area. 5. AUTHORIZE execution of agreement for construction of private improvements in Minor Subdivision 99-75, Alamo-Danville area. 6. INTRODUCE ordinance repealing section of the County Ordinance Code which mandates certain animal control procedures for non-contracting cities; waive reading and fix December 23, 1975 for adoption. 7. ADOPT ordinance (introduced December 9, 1975) amending the Ordinance Code to provide for reimbursement of vacation credits for management employees, subject to certain conditions. R. AUTHORIZE legal defense for persons who have so requested in connection with Suuerior Court Actions Nos. 159347, 159422, 154237, 159159 and 157450. 9. DENY claim of track Bernstine, S50,000_ QM Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued December 16, 1975 10. INTRODUCE ordinances adopting the 1975 National Electric Code and changing the present fee schedule of the 1973 Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical codes; waive reading and fix January 13, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. for hearings thereon. items 11 - 21: DF'TERI4INATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item.) 11. CONSIDER action to be taken on appointment of county fire protection district commissioners whose terms expire December 31, 1975. APPOINT CO1'4MISSIONTERS 12. LETTER from County Sheriff-Coroner commenting on report to State Legislature required by January 1, 1976 with respect to requirement of provision of equal facilities for male and female inmates, pursuant to Penal Code Section 4029 W. AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF A LETTER TO THE LEGISLATURE FOR SUEMITTAL BY TIM BOARD CHAIRMAN 13. LETTER from Chairman, Emergency Medical Care Committee, supporting federal legislation which would continue the Emergency Medical Services Systems Act and provide training funds to meet changing needs for emergency medical services personnel. AUTHORIZE SUBMITTAL OF LETTER TO FEDERAL LEGISL_4TORS CONCURRING WITH REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF LEGISLATION CITED 14. LETTER from County Sheriff-Coroner (in response to Board referral of letter from Ms. Karen Lehman with respect to reasons for which inmates are being held in county jail) transmitting copy from State Board of Corrections of unannounced survey conducted of unsentenced prisoner population in Contra Costa County Jail and Branch Jail on April 16, 1975 which indicated that only 3 of 130 inmates were eligible for release. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND DIRECT CLERK TO SEND COPY OF REPORT TO MS. LEHMAN AND OTHERS t:HO HAVE EXPRESSED CO?:CE N Oii THIS ISSUE 15. LETTER from Superintendent, Mt. Diablo Unified School District, stating that the district requires more legal services than are presently available from County Counsel, and requesting that adequate services be provided. REFER TO AI14INISTRATIOIT AND FINANCE C=4ITTEE, COUNTY AUMINISTRATOR, AND COUNTY COUNSEL 16. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that said Board has completed its countywide solicitation for candidates to fill five vacancies on the Advisory Board and submitting its nominees therefrom. REFER TO WW'%L4.N RESOURCES C0101ITTEE 17. LETTER from Citizens Advisory Committee for County Service Area R-8 (Walnut Creek area) requesting that Park Dedication Trust Funds ($13,000) be allocated to the service area to permit acquisition of property located on Shell Ridge. REFER TO PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES ADVISORY C0101ITTEE 18. LETTER from tis. Gladys M. Motta, Martinez, commenting on the cancellation of an employee group disability insurance program, and requesting that the Board approve a State Disability Insurance program for County employees. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PERSONYIEL 40004 �101_ + Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued December lb, 1975 19. LETTER from Ms. Donna Martindale, Vallejo, commenting on the environmental impact of the proposed Dow Chemical Company plant to be located in Solano and Contra Costa Counties. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLAbIMG TO ANSWER 20. LETTER submitted on behalf of California-National Air Services Inc. stating that it desires to negotiate with county representatives for a ground lease at Buchanan Field. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR RECOMMENDATION 21. LETTER from Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors urging support for enactment of federal legislation (HR 9544) which would provide flexibility in the use of federal gas tax revenues. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR REPORT Item 22: INFORMATION (Copies of commuai.cation iste as information item have been furnished to all interested parties.) 22. LETTER from Secretary, Citizens for Community Involvement, urging that the $3,000,000 social service budget deficit be cut "by funding community alternatives to incarceration rather than extravagant use of taxpayers money to fund maximum security detention for minor offenders.,' Persons addressing the Board should em-late the form provi a on a ros and furnish the Clerk with a written coat/ of their oresentation. DEADLINE FOR AG IDA ITEMS: WMIESDAY, 5 P.M. 00045 2 I OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CO2JTR.A COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions December 16, 1975 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Frac To Marshal- 265 Deputy Clerk III Process Clerk Delta 101 Marshal- 260 Deputy Clerk III Supervising Mt. Diablo 101 Process Clerk Marshal- 262 Deputy Clerk III Supervising Richmond #O1 Process Clerk Marshal- 264 Deputy Clerk III Process Clerk Walnut Creek- 601 Danville Marshal- 263 Deputy Clerk III Process Clerk West #O1 Planning 357 Intermediate Senior Clerk . Stenographer Clerk #02 Probation 321 Group Group Counsellor II . Counsellor III to7 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Cost Department Center Addition Cancellation Auditor 010 1 Programming 1 Supervising and Analysis Data Processing Supervisor Analyst 00l1W a w To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: 2. I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as Follows: , Cost . Department Center Addition Cancellation Auditor 020 Buyer II -- (Class only) Clerk of 002 1 Intermediate 1 Senior Clerk the Board Stenographer s01 Clerk Health 450 Alcoholism -= Rehabilitation Assistant (Class only) Probation 314 1 Group 1 Group Counsellor II Grounsellor III #02 Sheriff- 256 -- 1 Sheriff's Coroner Dispatcher #20 F, Walnut 214 1 Deputy Clerk 1 Deputy Clerk Creek- III II #08 Danville Municipal Court 3. Authorize appointment of Mrs. Shirley J. Kelly, z Physical Therapist, at the second step ($1,081 per month) of Salary Range 337 ($1,030-$1,252) , effective December 17, 1975, as recommended by the Civil F Service Commission. II_ GIFTS AND DONATIONS 4. . Accept gift of $200 from the Gemco Foundation, Walnut Creek Chapter, for the Probation Department Girls' Center. III. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS None. WW 7 _ I To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: 3. IV. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 5. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for the following budget units: Public Works Department (Road Construction, Aid to Cities, Road Maintenance Yards, Storm Drainage Maintenance District 4, County Service Area R-7, County Airport, Plant Acquisition-Library) , County Auditor-Controller (Purchasing Various) , Office of Emergency Services. V. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS ` None. i VI. BOARD AND CARE PLACEtiENT/RATES 6. Home and/or Effective Department Institution Rate Date Social Onnia Manning Foster Home $200 12-3-75 + Service Pittsburg, California Probation Sunny Hills/San Anselmo $1,450 12-17-75 7. Authorize amendment of Resolution No. 75/523 to add the following institution, as recommended by the County Probation Officer: Institution Monthly Rate Oak-haven Academy Group Home/Sacramento $843 VII. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS i 8. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose - Amount Period State Health Department $521,600 7-1-75 Department Early and Peri- (Grant to of Health odic Screening, funds) 6-30-76 Diagnosis and Treatment Project (EPSDT) ows i 7 ' t To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: 4. VII. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS o• Art"Uv- .'Alu ,L&"­ to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose - Amount Pe- State Health Department $521,600 7-1-75 Department Early and Peri- (Grant to of Health odic Screening, funds) 6-30-76 Diagnosis and Treatment Project - (EPSDT) OW8 t To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: 4. VII. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 8. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supe visors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Mt. Diablo Continuation of $91,000 10-1-75 Rehabilitation services to dis- ($68,250 through Center abled and unem- Federal/ 9-30-76 ployed persons $22,750 County) City of District $19,138 7-1-75 Richmond Attorney Major ($16,999 to Offenders in Grant 6-30-76 Project funds) State Office of Review of needs $18,212 1-1-76 Criminal Justice and plan for (Federal to Planning meeting needs of and 6-30-76 low-risk female private offenders funds) State Amendment to -- 7-1-74 Department County Alcoholism to of Health Program Information 12-31-75 and Evaluation System Project Budget State Extension of -- 1-1-76 Department Geriatric Screening to of Health Project Amendment 6-30-76 for six months Ken Gearhart, Mental Health $75.00 1-26-76 Ph.D. staff training 9. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to execute an agreement for professional services with an addi- tional physician for the Medical Services Department effective November 8, 1975. • VWV� To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: S. VIII.LEGISLATION . None. IX. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 10. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a lease agreement between County and Mr. and Mrs. Leonard Picolet for parcel number 97-050-003, being 2.15 acres of lard on Alves Lane in West Pittsburg, for use by the Upsprout Community Gardens Project, for the period December 20, 1975 to January 1, 1977 (for the sum of ! $1.00) . X. OTHER ACTIONS 11. Acknowledge receipt of memorandum from County Administrator transmitting report on 1975 Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY) . ' 12. Adopt resolution providing authorization for County departments to establish flextime employee work scheduling plans on a trial basis. Implementing procedures require that approval of the appointing authority and the County Administrator be obtained. 13. Consider actions to be taken with respect to continu- ation of Discovery Motivational House located at 4639 Pacheco Blvd. , Martinez. Recommendations are as follows: a. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to pay for utilities for the period October 1, 1975 through December 31, 1975; and b. Refer to Administration and Finance Committee for review the request of the Director, Human Resources Agency, that Board authorize the Public Works Department to negotiate a lease for continued occupancy of the premises_ t 14. Consider staff report with respect to request made by the Danville Parking District Taxpayers Advisory i Committee to initiate necessary actions to sell surplus property within Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking) . 00010 t To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 12-16-75 Page: 6. X. OTHER ACTIONS 15. Adopt resolution continuing provision of uniform allowance to certain employees in the Office of Sheriff-Coroner and Marshals Offices. 16. Authorize increase from $150 to $500 of petty cash fund for County Service Area R-6, Orinda. 17. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to continue to perform a human resources legislative function during calendar year 1976 through assignment of a Social Service Department staff member to the Human Resources Agency on a temporary basis. NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specified time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 PH 00011 i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California December 16, 1,975 E X T R A B U S I N E S S SUPERVI-SORIA-1., DISTRICT V Item 1. WESTERN CONTINENTAL OPERATING COMPANY FRANCHISE Western Continental Operating Company has submitted an application and descriptions for a fuel line franchise along Empire Avenue and Laurel. Road in the Oakley area. A Negative Declaration of environmental impact was posted on December 12, 1975. The Public Works Department recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize publication of a NOTICE OF SALE OF FRANCHISE and set 11:00 a.m. on January 20, 1976, as the tine to receive bids and conduct the necessary public hearing in conformance ,,rith County Ordinance 1327 It is further recommended that the County Counsel be directed to draft the necessary resolution declaring the Board's intention to advertise and sell a franchise for pipelines in County highways, as provided in County Ordinance 1827. (LD} EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Denartment Page i of 1 ,December 16, 1975 0N12 r CONTRA COSTA COL14TY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT RTi4ENT Martinez, California I . - 1079 EXTRA BUSINESS Public t:orks Department Page i of l December 16, 1975 0012 CONTRA COSTA COL14TY PUBLIC WORKS DEPART14ENT Martinez, California December 16; 1975 A G E N D A REPORTS (No Reports) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS I 6 V Item I. PARK AVENUE AND MARSH CREEK ROAD - AUTHORIZE AGREEMENT - RICHAiOND AND CLAYTON AREAS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreementwith Peter Kaldveer and Associates. The Agreement provides for foundation investigations to be made at the sites of the Marsh Creek Road bridge and the Park Avenue bridge on Wildcat Creek. The Agreement has a payment limit of $2,700.00 for the Park Avenue site and $3,200.00 for the Marsh Creek Road site. These limits cannot be exceeded without prior approval of the Public Works Director. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please forward a copy of the appropriate Board Order to the Public Works Department.) (RE: Project No. 1065-4526-72/Park Avenue Bridge, and Project No. 3971-4301-76/Marsh Creek Bridge) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 2. SOBRANTE AVENUE - APPROVE ROAD CLOSURE - EI Sobrante Area The East Bay Municipal Utility District requested permission for a partial road closure of Sobrante Avenue (County Road No. 1272) between its two intersections with Circle Drive for the purpose of installing a water line. The road was closed December 8, 1975, through December 12, 1975, between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Traffic was detoured via Circle Drive. Emergency traffic was allowed to pass through. rly.in-r ,n,,.-nva 1 was granted by the Public WoriCs Director in ^- a rl n-nrr�c REPORTS (No Reports) SUP£RLTISORIAL DISTRICTS I & V Item I. PARK AVENUE AND MARSH CREEK ROAD - AUTHORIZE AGREEDIBNT - RICHMOND AND CLAYTON AREAS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Public 6dorks Director to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Peter Kaldveer and Associates. The Agreement provides for foundation investigations to be made at the sites of the Marsh Creek Road bridge and the Park Avenue bridge on Wildcat Creek. The Agreement has a payment limit of $2,700.00 for the Park Avenue site and $3,200.00 for the Marsh Creek Road site. These limits cannot be exceeded without prior approval of the Public Works Director. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please forward a copy of the . appropriate Board Order to the Public Works Department.) (RE: Project No. 1065-4526-72/Park Avenue Bridge, and Project No. 3971-4301-76/1,arsh Creek Bridge) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 2. SOBRANTE AVENUE - APPRO'%TE ROAD CLOSURE - El Sobrante Area The East Bay Municipal Utility District requested permission for a partial road closure of Sobrante Avenue (County Road No. 1272) between its two intersections with Circle Drive for the purpose of installing a crater line. The road was closed December 8, 1975, through December 12, 1975, between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Traffic was detoured via Circle Drive. Emergency traffic was allowed to pass through. Prior approval was granted by the Public Works Director in accordance with Item 3 of the Board Policy on Road Closures with the following conditions: 1. All signing is to be in accordance with the State of California Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices, dated 1971, and the County Manual of V.arning Signs, Lights and Devices. 2. The contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the action taken by the public Yorks Director. (LD) A G E N D A Public lKorks Department, Page 1 ofG December 16, 1975 00013 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 3. SILVERWOOD COURT - APPROVE DRAINAGE FACILITIES RELOCATION - Orinda Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the relocation of drainage facilities at the west end of Silver- wood Court, Orinda, and authorize the Public Works Director to arrange for a purchase order to the Richmond Crane Service of Richmond for $4,875.00, the lowest of three bids received. The work consists of installation. of 200 feet of 15-inch corrugated metal pipe, one Type "C' junction_ box, anchor pipes and grading as necessary. This work is needed to restore drainage that was destroyed by a slide. The new pipe would be routed to bypass the unstable area. This work is a Class I Categorical Exemption from Environ- mental Impact requirements. (RE: Work Order 4751) (FC) Item 4. SUBDIVISION 4506 - ACCEPT COUNTY ROADS - Walnut Creek Area The construction of improvements in Subdivision 4506 has been satisfactorily completed. The $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement, evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 112418, dated November 9, 1973, is to be retained for one year, in accordance with Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: a. Issue an Order stating that the stork is complete. b. Accept as County roads the following named streets which are shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4506 filed November 14, 1973, in Book 165 of Maps at page 1. Candelero Drive (40/56/0.17) Candelero Court (36/56/0.01) Candelero Court (32/33/0.01) Candelero Place (32/33/0.01) Treat Boulevard Widening Road Group: 4057 Total Mileage: 0.20 mile Subdivision Agreement dated November 13, 1973 Subdivider: Kaiser Aetna, Ponderosa Homes Division 3080 Olcott Boulevard, Suite 200B, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Location: Subdivision 4506 is located on Treat Boulevard gest of Candelero Drive. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV (No Items) A_ G E N D A Public Works Deoartment Page?of 6 December 16, I975 00014 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 5. BALFOUR ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING - AUTHORIZE SUPPLEMENT TO AGREMMENT - Brentwood Area Subdivision Agreement dated November 13, 1973 Subdivider: Kaiser Aetna, Ponderosa Homes Division 3080 Olcott Boulevard, Suite 200B, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Location: Subdivision 4506 is located on Treat Boulevard west of Candelero Drive. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV (No Items) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 6 December 16, 1375 00014 q SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 5. BALFOUR ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING - AUTHORIZE SUPP_LEMIT TO AGREEMENT - Brentwood Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize its Chairman to execute Program Supplement No. 3 to-Local Agency - State Agreement No. 1 for a Federal-Aid Railway - Highway Grade Crossing Improvement, pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1973. The supplement provides for 90% Federal, 10% local funding for the installation of automatic gate arms and flashing light signals at the Southern Pacific Trans- portation Company railroad crossing (#B-62.2) of Balfour Road. Estimated total project cost is $42,000.00 with the County share approximately $4,200.00. (RE: Project No. 7351A-4322-76) (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Return one copy to Public Works Department for further processing.) (RD) Item 6. HARTZ AVENUE - APPROVE AGREEMANT AND ACCEPT DEED - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the Deferred Inwrovement Agreement for Develop- ment Permit 3034-75 and authorize the Public Works Director to execute it on behalf of the County. The Deferred Improvement Agreement is a condition of approval required by the Zoning Administrator. 2. Accept the Grant Deed from Janes 11. Lessner and Janet J. Lessner, dated December 5, 1975, for additional road right of tray along Hartz Avenue. Owner: James :I. Lessner and Janet J. Lessner, 745 Tunbridge Road, Danville, CA 94526. Location: Development Permit 3034-75 is located between Railroad Avenue and Hartz Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Church Street. (RE: Assessor's Parcel No. 208-024-02 and Portion 08) (LD) Item 7. SAN RADION VALLEY BOULEVARD - AUTHORIZE AGREE14ENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Forks Director to sign a Land Use Agreement with Dr. Gloria Dodd for rental of vacant County property on San Ramon Valley Boulevard, north of Crow Canyon Road, San Ramon area. The property is to be used for landscaping and sign purposes in exchange for weed abatement, maintenance and care of the property. (RE: Work Order 4805) (RP) A_ G E N D A Public Woks Deaa.rtment Page 3 of 6 December 16, 1975 00015 Item 8. LINES E & E-1 - DEED ACCEPTANCE - B_eiitwood Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors as Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Co9ta County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, accept a Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract dated December 2, 1975 from Clifton B. Cooper, et ux. , and authorize the Public Yorks Director to sign the contract on behalf of the County. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to draw a warrant for $2,265.00 for resi- dential land payable to Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-236668. (Deliver warrant to Real Property Division.) (RE: Work Order 8514) (RP) Item 9. DIABLO ROAD - DEED ACCEPTS%CE - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the Grant Deed and Right of Way Contract dated December 8, 1975 from James Brennan, et al, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the contract on behalf of the County. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to craw a warrant for $447.00 in favor of James Brennan, John C. Forsyth, and Betty Forsyth, and deliver to the County Real Property Agent for payment. Payment is for 149 square feet of office zoned land. (RE: Project No. 4721-415.0-74) (RP) Item 10. SUBDIVISION 4650 - APPRONIE AGREEMENT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4650. 2. Accept a Drainage Release dated December 9, 1975 from Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware Corporation. O«ner: Boise Cascade Corporation, a Deleware Corporation, P. O. Box 10100, Palo Alto, CA 94303 Location: Subdivision_ 4650 is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Old Ranch Road with Alcosta Boulevard. (LD) Item 13. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed dated 11-20-75 from Sylvia M. Langford with reference to I-IS 99-75; and a Grant Deed dated 12-8-75 from Clarence A.A. Harris, et al. with reference to San Ramon Valley Boulevard. (LD) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 6 December 16, 1975 00016 w. Item 12. SAN RAMON' VALLEY BOULEVARD - APPROVE DEFERRED IMPR0«.,.YENT AGREEYXNT - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Deferred Improvement Agreement for Land Use Permit 324-72, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute it on behalf of the County. The Deferred Improvement Agreement is a condition of approval by the Planning Commission. Otrner: Gloria Dodd, 2355 San Ramon Valley Boulevard, San Ramon, CA 94583 Location: Land Use Permit 324-72 is located on the south- west corner of the intersection of San Ramon Valley Boule- vard and Thorup Lane. (RE: Assessor's Parcel No. 208-290-08 & 09) (LD) Item 13. SUBDIVISION 4446 - REFUND DEPOSIT - Brentwood Area The one-year satisfactory performance period after acceptance of the streets for maintenance has been successfully completed. It is therefore recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the stree- and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-year satisfactory per- formance period and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Charles Pringle, P. O. Box 305, Brentwood, CA 94513,the $720.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement. (Deposit Permit Detail No. 121308 dated November 8, 1974 for $370.00 and Deposit Permit Detail No. 102486 dated September 28, 1972 for $1,500.00, a total of $1,870.00, of which $1,150.00 was refunded by Board Order dated June 10, 1975.) Streets were accepted for maintenance on December 3, 1974. Subdivider: Charles Pringle, P. O. Box 305, Brentwood, CA 94513 Location: Subdivision 4446 is located at the intersection of Minnesota Avenue and Randy Way. (LD) A G E P? D A Public Works Department page 5 off' 6 December 16, 1975 00017 GENERAL Item 14. JUVENILE HALL AUXILIARY GYNNMASIUM - Accept Contract - Martinez It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept as complete as of December 16, 1975 the construction contract with Malpass Construction Company of Pleasant Hill for the Juvenile Hall Auxiliary Gkmnasium and direct its Clerk to file the appropriate Notice of Completion. It is also recommended that the Board of Supervisors extend the -contract time from September 1, 1975 to December 16, 1975. The County began beneficial occupancy on September 1, 1975. The final contract cost was $516,354.73. (RE: iyork Order 5396) (B & G) Item 15. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STATER AGENCY 1. The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Supervisors information and public. distribution. No action required. 2. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider attached "Calendar of Water Meetings. No action required. (EC) ZdGTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A G E N D A Public Works Department -' �age76 o1 6 December 16, 1975 00018 Prepared joint,), by the Water Resources Representative and the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County Eater agency December I0, I975 Public VIorks DePa;- Eat DeceInber 161 1975 AGEL` DA �� Page 6 of 6 O� Prepares! Jointly by the Water Resources Representative and the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County (rater Agency December 10, 1975 CALENDAR OF WATER %f MjVGS TIME ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE RE.IIARK.S Recommended Authorization Dec. 18 Thurs. Delta Advisory 5-6 p.m. Technical Advisory Staff Planning City Hall Co=ittee Workshop Council 1 Wn St. Delta Action Plan Rio Vista .1 an. 9 Fri. California 9:00 a.m. Regular fleeting Staff 1976 Water Sacramento Commission 00019 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Ordinances Introduced. (Gov. Code Sec. 50022.3) The following ordinances which amend the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County having been introduced, the Board by unan— imous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes January 13, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. as the time for public hearing thereon: 1. On Building Fee Schedule Changes; 2. On Electrical Equipment & Installations; Amending Div. 76 of the Ordinance Code; and Adopting by Reference the following codes: 1975 National Electrical Code with changes, Sub—Chap. 5 of Title 8 & Pt. 3 of Title 24 of the Calif. Administrative Code, and General Orders 95 & 128 of Cal. Util. Com.; and The Clerk of this Board is directed to cause notice of said public hearings to be published pursuant to Government Code Section 6066 in the Concord Daily Transcript, a newspaper of general circulation in this County. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Building Inspection Supervisors affixed this 16th day of Dec#-tuber , 197 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B _ Qex , 4beputy Clerk Eondalyn+ Snackl s H 20 8175 10M 00020 F` In the Board 'of Supervisors of Contra Costa County,- State of California Dece.-nber 16 . 19 75 M the Matter of ' Ordinance(s) Introduced. The following ordinance(s) which amend(s) the Crdinance Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes December 23 . 1975 as the time for adoption of same: :Repeals Section 111'6-3.016 which mandates certain animal control procedures for non-contracting cities. PASSED by the Board on December 15, 1175 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dare aforesaid. 1r`ttness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cfFixed this 16th day of December _ 19 7 d. R. Ot.SSON, Clerk 6y Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 -ISM 5ofinie Boaz 00021 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) .Adopted. This being the date fined to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which uras Gere) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORD&RS that said ordinance(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk: shall publish same as required by law. Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 75-52 Amending the Ordinance Code CONCORD DAILY to provide for reimbursement TRANSCRIPT of vacation credits for management employees, subject to certain conditions. PASSED on December 16, 1975 by the following vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NOES ABSENT . ?. aenny (x) ( ) ( ) A. M. Dias (x) ( ) J. E. Moriarty (x) ( } E. A. 3inscheid �Xxi I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervisors affixed this__ljEth _doy of D . _ _mb -r 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Gl F Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 -'15-M Helen C. Marshall 00022 5 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 19- 75 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the fon poinp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2 f t h day of December. 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY- ni t Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 00023 H 24 8/75 IOU I Y j POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Marshal - i Department Delta Judicial District Budget Unit 265 Date December 3, 1975 Action Requested: Request to reallocate Deputv Clerk IIT_ position #01 and ineumben t to the class of Process Clerk Proposed effective date: Jan 1. 1976 Explain why adjustment is needed: To effectuate the provisions of Covernmpnt end,* section 73353 which was amended by Senate Bill No. 882 and which beccoes effective_ - - - - anuary 1. Estimated cost b-f ad.ustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries�nd wa es. $ 2. Fixed As its; (t iAt .i to ns and cost) Contra Cosa County IJ nrerIVrD DEC 37.5 $ Estimated totalpifice of $ NONE - Signatu rnir�i at / Department Vad Asst Director of Personnel Initial Determination of County Administrator ate: December 5. 1975 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count finis t r Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9. 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III position #01 to Process Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reallocation to the class of Process Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the re- allocation of the person and position of Deputy Clerk III #01 to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 (839-1020). A Asst- Personnel DVector Recommendation of County Administratorate: December 15, 1975 Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III, position number 01, to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 ($839- $1,020), effective December 17, 1975. t s County Adrn:nistrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on ::: r. toT J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: CEC 1 G 1975 - 8y:— �-•+� on a y ..t�,u�y Lierk APPROVAL oa adjustment co►tstitutes w: A,nprop .icrtio►i Adjustment and PrJvsannUG24 Resotuti.on Amendment. l NT REQUEST . pOSI TION ADJUSTME . . Unit 260 : Date:3/2'T�� ` s Office Budget h � Department Iit. DiabloMM rs�' � - f r Y 21-V r1 PV4, III to De :.1erY EYPT.'. Reallocate the person and number 01, to Process Clerk atfSalauty Clerk IIZ $1,020j, effective December l7 Salary Level 270 2, position 1975. 92 C$839- i County Adrn:ristrator Action of tine board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED � on Date: DEC 1 G 1975 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk By:— on u y APPROVAL o ' .th, s adj �a�,urY Lierk a wejuime cotstees a)? APWWWL'iati.on Adjus4ment and P Pe3o�utco,t A►nc>:dm2,tt. ecsonngit h UUV 24 . n ,. : •a rt. k:T.ate, .J POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST . No: - � Department Mt. Diablo Marsbal's office Budget Unit 260 ` Date 3/27/15 T Action Requested: IIpgra ims of Deputy Clerk III to Deputy-Clerk Xy Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Pbsition has not been evaluated since 1962 — Work Load and Responsibilities bave increased %_tsnrra L ossa Couaty Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEIVE© Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: r��,; $ 209.00 per month 2. Fixed Assets: I.tisL .items Mid cast) Office of County &4,n; i,& Estimated total S 2,508 per yr. / Signature � , n - Department Mea Chn GSOSHLL, MARSHAL Initial Determination of- County Administrator - Date-: April 2, 1975" To Civil t cce: � Request classification recoatnendat' Co Ami i strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify Deputy Clerk III to Supervising Process Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification. to Supervising Process Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action_ can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Deputy Clerk III position $01, Salary Level 270 (839-1020) to Supervising Proces Clerk, Salary Level 318 (972-1181). - A Asst. Personnel Dyrector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: 1)Pr_PmbPr 1501975 Reclassify (1) Deputy Clerk, position number 01, Salary level 270 R$839-$11020 , to Supervising Process Clerk, Salary Level 318 972-$1,181�, effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( 1 on J. R. OLSSON - County Clerk Date: P, By: Dondolynn SR=' s Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 .this adjustment ee,u.titutes an Apptoptia tion Adjustment and Pe,"annee Re s o.Cctti"eu Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form roast be completed and supplemented, when '. c, POSITION ADJUSTM,E-NT REQUEST No: 3f� Department R7ARSHAL--- • Budget Unit 262 Date Sept. 10, 1974 Action Requested: Up-grading of Deputy Clerk 111, [Marshal 's Office to Deputy Clerk IV Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Position has not been evaluated since 1962 Work load and responsibilities have increased. Estimate4st cost cz.%,,-A CQLIN Y ' Amount: r) p 1 . War' a* wages: s 209.00 per month 2. FixedlftsaU: (.Gist .itew and cad.t) c=P 1 L O r n-f;cn L,t .� Cr,rah Ad,'�i : :a+or 2,508 per year L Estimated 161 d ' ? Signature ./ ur... Department Headl' Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: September 17, 19?�j To Civil Service: Request classification recoamtendation. &Zv"' - County A(Wiffin,41'silfr1for Personnel Office and/of Civil Service Commission Date: DPCPmhPrg, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Deputy Clerk III to Supervising Process Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Supervising Process Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Deputy Clerk III position #01, Salary Level 270 (839-1020) to Supervising Process Clerk, Salary Level 318 (972-1181). y . Asst. Personnel D.Yrector Recommendation of County Administrator ,jtSate: December 15, 1975 Reclassify one (1) Deputy Clerk, position number 01, Salary Level 270 ($1339-$1,020), to Supervising Process Clerk, Salary Level 318 ($972-$1,181), effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of SupervisorsE 11975 Adjustment APPROVED ( -_ n or: J. R. OLSSON 1,1County Clerk Date: DEC 1 G 1975 By:^ �s Rondo!yrnn 'R es epu jerk APPRJVML ej t biA adjustment const.i,tateZ cit App4opAi.ati.on Adjuetmeitt and Peuonnee 2 ReAotutioiz Amendment. NOTE- TIno ion and reverse side t be m 1 d s lemen 3 V POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: marshal - Walnut Creek - 264 Date December 3' 1915 Department Danville Judicial District Budget Unit — 2/0 0839-$1,UZU), to Superv:Lsing Process clerk, Sarah( Level -ilb ($472-$12181), effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED (Ur n or D E C 161975 r I R. OLS_S_ON I - ' County Clerk Date: DEC 16 1975 By:'i) Rondalynn epu jerk APPROVAL ej th-i6 adjus&,esit cOrsti-itu,teA ait App4O ou Adjustment and Peuonnel' Rezotuti.on Amendment. JNOTE' T D-section and reverse sideof fom be 1 d s Iemen iii Y 1 1 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: A(-- L0 Marshal — Walnut Creek — Department Danville'Judicial District Budget Unit 264 Date December 3, 1975 Action Requested: Request to reallocate Deputy Clerk III position #01 and incumbent to the class of Process Clerk Proposed effective date: Jan 1, 1976 Explain why adjustment is needed: To effectuate tlr provisions of Government Code Section 73356 which was amended by Senate Rill No. 382 and which becomes effective January 1, 1976 Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa Counly Amount: RECEIVED 1 . Salaries-and .*ages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (tcs.t .items a►td coat-) r C Office of $ County Administrator NONE Estimated total - = Signature f l WpartmenY Head Asst Director of Personnel Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 5, 1975 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. 4I C nt A in ra or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9. 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III position #01 to Process Clerk. study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reallocation to the class of Process Clerk. Can be effective day-following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the realloca tion of the person and position of Deputy Clerk III position #01 to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 (839-1020). Asst. Personnel Wector jRecommendation of County Administrator ate: December 15, 1975 I Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III, position number 01, to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 ($839- $1,020), effective December 17, 1975. County -,A for Action of the Board of Supervisors E 1 �g75 Adjustment APPROVED ftp""" " " } on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: DE': 1 r mp;- Bye -r Rondolynn ShaWes Deputy Clerk APPROVAL oa .flims adjw.tmefat co,tstitates an App.-toptiati.on Adjustment and Peuonne2 c Ruotuti.on Arbidment. 00*27 + POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Marshal - Departmmnt West Judicial District Budget Unit 263 Date December 3, 1475 t Action Requested: Request to reallocate Deputy Clerk III position #01 and incumbent to class of Process Clerk Proposed effective date: Jan 1, 1976 Explain why adjustment is needed: To effectuate the provisions of Government Code section 73358 which was amended by Senate '111 No. 882 and which becomes effective January 1, 1976. COntrc, Cosi Estimated cost of adjustment: RFCEJV County Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: DEC VfD 2. Fixed Assets (lest .items and cost) J 19.75 ce of$ minrstrCdor $ Estimated total Mone Signature , Departmen , �?Head Asst Director of Personnel Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: December 5 1975 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. !, c . Co ht A ml m str or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Der pmhpr 9- 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III position 101 to Process Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reallocation to the class of Frocess Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the realloca- tion of the person and position of Deputy Clerk III position #01 to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 (839-1020). Personnel Divtctor Recommendation of County Administrator 0 te: December 15, 1975 Reallocate the person and position of Deputy Clerk III, position number 01, to Process Clerk, both at Salary Level 270 ($839- $1,020, effective December 17, 1975. 604�� - County Adm.rl_trator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on PEC' 1 A 1475 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: GcC 1 1975 _ By: i �- Rondotynn Shac .s Deputy Clerk APPROVAL o6 this adju6tmentt constitutes an Appnop4ia ion Adjustment and Peirsonnet p Rezotufion Amendment. 0.3028 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQU..Ej-ST No: Department Planning Budget Umt,35�: � '. 1'J9/26/75 Action Requested: Reclassify Intermediate Steno Clerk= voslf4R Z2 to Senior Clerk (Steno) Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Responsibilities and complexity of position merits higher classification. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Cosa Coun.. Amount: OPCEI E 1. Salaries and wages: 2. Fixed Assets: (LiAt .c temb and cost) ceof $ un ministrator Estimated total $ Signature 7 Depar�Lne t hea A t Initial Determination of County Administrato Date: September 26 1975 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9. 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Intermediate Stenographer Clerk to Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Senior Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Intermediate Stenographer Clerk, position #02, Salary Level 222 (725-881) to Senior Clerk, Salary Level 247 (781-951). Asst. Personnel . rector Recommendation of County Administrator ,/Date: December 15, 1975 Reclassify one (1) Intermediate Stenographer Clerk, position number 02, Salary Level 222 ($725-$881), to Senior Clerk, Salary Level 247 ($781-$951), effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. 05SON County Clerk Date: �'- i, i i; 1 ;5 By:� t ' FZO-1dalynn S les C°pu-j Gerk APPROVAL o' r_i.i.s adju-stment constitactes an Apptoptiation Adjuabnent and PeA6onnet Rcsotatio:: Amen&eiat. W029 tion and reverse side of form mu4 t be completed a"; supplemented, when . . a i • Ction and reverse side of form must be completed a"'� supplemented, when POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department PROBATION - GIRLS' CENTER Budget Unit 321 Date Action Requested: Reclassify Group Counselor I [ , positron 107 (Mary Frey) to Group Counselor III Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Mrs. Frey is certifiable on Counselor III list. Position authorized as either Group Counselor 11 or Group Counselor III Estimated cost of adjustment: Cosa Cocnt; Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED � 2. Fixed Assets: (l i at iter b and cost) ;%.e tirI-1 r_ n U:-rCC of $ LJ Estimated total Signature Zt ea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 21 1975 To Civil Ser�ce: Reque-st recommendation. LLZ- z� ' Coun dministrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 Group Counsellor II to Group Counsellor III. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Group Counsellor III. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassi- fication of Group Counsellor II, position 107, Salary Level 305 (934-1135) to Group Counsellor III, Salary Level 337 (1030-1252). Personnel Di rector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: npr-pmbpr l S. 1 A75 Reclassify one (1) Group Counsellor II, position number 07, Salary Level 305 $934-$1, 135), to Group Counsellor III, Salary Level 337 $1,030-$1,252), effective December 17, 1975. County A inis rator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on DEC 1 G i9-5 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk DEC 1 j..,r . i Date: — BY: .;�-, �l��cf londa!yr:n Shcaca tiles Deputy Cleck APPROVAL o f thib adju tme►Lt eon3.titutea ar. App-to -on A i ub4inent and Peuonne2ff������t Re a otuti.on Ame ndme►tt. O N NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when �- —� M. Z„ nrn-ni-p- -inn rh art dPRirfinn the curtir i nr nffirp. -ffprfiari ¢ �7 l .s..r i POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: �y Department Auditor-Controller Budget Unit 010. Date 12/3/75 Action Requested: Establish class of Programming and Analysis Su e�rviaor Per Resolution 74/765; add one position. Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify duties and responsibilities Estimated ces-t off" d stment: Amount: Contra Costa County I. Salaries -ad sages: RECEIVED � 2. Fixed Assets:U(tzst .it w and coat) , $ Co !-7, Adator Estimated tota"T' $ _>> _ c� '' Signature De0a ,en Hea initial Determination of County Administrator Da December 8 197 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. Count mfmstrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: n,ramhpr 9, 1475 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Programming and Analysis Supervisor. Classify I position. Cancel 1 Supervising Data Processing Analyst on Board Resolution 74/765. On December 9, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Programming and Analysis Supervisor and recommended Salary Level 489 (1637-1990). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding I Programming and Analysis Supervisor, Salary Level 489 (1637-1990) and amending Resolution 71/17, Alloca- tion of Budgeted Positions to Certain County Departments, by adding 1 Programming and Analysi Supervisor, Salary Level 489 (1637-1990) and cancelling 1 Supervising Data Processing Analyst no salary recommended. Can be effective day following Board action. This position is exempt from overtime. G . Asst.Personnel Mylector Recommendation of County Administrator te: December 15, 1975 Allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Programming and Analysis Supervisor, Salary Level 489 ($1,638-$1,990), and and one (1) position; cancel one (1) Supervising Data Processing Analyst (no salary recommended), effective December 17, 1975. 6&0_z� County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( - _ ) on DEC 1 61975 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk DEC 9. 1 Date: 1 7 By: �,„ ��C; ,c C 3� Rondo►ynnes Vepusy Clerk APPROVAL o6 tlLia adju6tme t coizdtZWea ar. App.,opn.iati.on Adju tment and PeUoDOOM Ruotuti.on Ame�.dme tt. POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: r' -7/-5 Department Auditor-Controller (Pur- Budget Unit oto Date 427/75 chasing) Action Requested: Create classification of Senior Buyer at salary level 365. 51121-1363 Proposed effective date: 4/30/7 Explain why adjustment is needed: To provide opportunity for advancement and rg owth in the Buyer activity. - Estimated cost of adjustment: - RECEIVED Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: APR 16 1 5 $ 2. Fixed Assets: (fiat -item6 and coat) Office k=my Aftinotor$ r Estimated total Signature l Depa a `.. Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: April 21 19'"15 To Civil Service: Request classification recommendation. Codn---tyAdmi nlstra or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: eeembprg, I474 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate class Buyer H. On December 9, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Buyer II and recommended Salary Level 384 (1188-1444). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Buyer II, Salary Level 384 (1188-1444). Can be effective day following Board action. This position is not exempt from overtime. Asst. Personnel Ditector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: December 15, x,2.75 Allocate to.the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Buyer II, Salary Level 384 ($1,188-$1,444), effective December 17, 1975. County Admi ni!fti�albr Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on OEC 1 G 19'15) K. LSSO:N County Clerk Date: t;� ('� i9i5 By: Rondelynn Shl ckles F+-,,y Genic APPROVAL ei tlu.6 adjubtment eoft6titutea ON ApWcopAi.ati•on Adia6b»ent and PeAAonnee Re6otutioa Amvidr vtt. 00032 'A rmnTr- Tan Pctio -a n reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when TRIP POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Clerk of the Board Budget Unit 002 Date 10-24-75 rlork Steno position 01 and establish Buyer II, 5alai Lcv,.L December 17, 1975. County ni ra r Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on C I G 1975 zS50'M County Clerk Date: LE c% 1 c. 1975 BY: A-,r,-( - , Rondalynn Shs -.kles —� -zii-o,y Gerk APPROVAL vi ttuib adjubment eata#,iit4teb an Appltopniation Adjudbnent and Peneonne,C Reaotuti.on Ame)u memtt. 0()(i32 and reverse side of form ntubt be completed and supplemented, when POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Ito: Department Clerk of the Board Budget Unit 002 Date 10-24-75 Action Requested: ' Cancel vacant Senior Clerk Steno Position 01 and establish Inter Steno position Proposed effective date: _11/1 Explain why adjustment is needed: Flexible staff- 'n� is nroDer for nosition. Estimated cost of ;adjustment: Contra Costo County Amount: 1 . Sa 1 ari e- and wages: RECEIVED $ 2. Fixed Assets: (.EiAt iteim and cost) OCT 2 $ 1075 Coun: _ .:�.. ,:.. ;tet Estimated total $ Signature Department Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: October 29, 1975 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. �m"b Mh County Admini str or Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Intermediate Stenographer Clerk and cancel 1 Senior Clerk. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Intermediate Stenographer Clerk. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Intermediate Stenographer Clerk, Salary Level 222 (725-881) and the cancellation of 1 Senior Clerk, position 101, Salary Level 247 (781-951). Asst. Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator ✓Date: December 15, 197 Add one (1) Intermediate Steno rapher Clerk, Salary Level 222 ($725-$881), and cancel one (1 Senior Clerk, position number 01, Salary Level 247 ($781-$951), effective December 17, 1975, County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( - ) on C=i. 151975 J. R. OISSON. County Clerk Date: r`. • I iQ7 By: "Q Randa'.ynn Sh#tries Deputy Gerk APPROVAL o f tlzi.s adjustment con&ti Lutea cut Apptopn i.ati.on Adjuabnent and PeAbonne,E Re sotui i.oit Am?%.dmejzt. 0J033 NOTE: Toe section and reverse side of form Must be completed and supplemented, when rt u NOTE: To sec and reverse side of form must be completed a��u :) Npg n w , m POS I T- 1 ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: if -a 41 450 Department HEALTH • Budget Unit *0 Date 6/9/75 Action Requested: Establish tho- class of Alcoholism Rehabilitation Specialist and allocate to the basic salary schedule Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: To properly classify duties and responsibilities Contra Costa Coun Estimated cost of adjustment: ConRECEIVEp � Amount: 1 . Sabiq�nd�ages: $ N/A 2. Fi coed Assets (Zat .item cnd coet) JUL 15 7575 .. za of S ministraitor �� Estimated total ` � a Signature r' Department Head DoZ"..... Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: 7/23/75 To Civil Service: Request Recommendation. }rl rtin Coudtv Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant. = On December 9, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the class of Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant and recommended Salary Level 250 (790-960). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant, Salary Level 250 (790-960). Can be effective day following Board action. This position is not exempt from overtime. 24 • Asst.Personnel Di ctor Recommendation of County Administrator Dite: December 15, 1975 Allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Alcoholism Rehabilitation Assistant, Salary Level 250 ($790-$960), effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( � ) o;, Lei; 1 f i5;� - - J. R. OLSSOII, County Clerk Date: � f; 1 f• l�',iri - By:` -C Rondoivnn S^-� f!s epuy er APPROVAL of .tJLiA adju.stme►:t co,tstiitu.tes an Appnopuiat ion Adjusbnent and PeAAonneZ Peb oti,&Uon Amea?&e tt. 0J034 APi KUVAL Da -OLI.6 11"J"" U J�1V`s Res0Zuti,o►: Ametitci►r.2►Li. own I POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: 7� Department PROBATION - JUVENILE HALL Budget Unit 314 Date 12/1/75 Action Requested: DOWNGRADE GROUP COUNSELOR III POSITION #02 to GROUP COUNSELOR If Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: Incumbent (Fambrini) being failed on Probation period as Group Counselor Ill. There is no vacant Group Counselor 11 position Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra Costa County Amount: r ' k= RECEIVED ries 1 . Salaand wages: 2. Fixed Assets {lcat i terra and coat) 75 $ Estimated totals " imator Signature / =� -Np—zfr-tm-enT Head ' Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: ! - :9-- '7S o Civil Service: Request recommendation. CL Countv Administratom-) Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Group Counsellor III; classify 1 Group Counsellor II. Incumbent having failed to meet the requirements of the duties and responsibilities of Group Counsellor III, it is hereby requested that position be downgraded to Group Counsellor II. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Group Counsellor II, Salary Level 305 (934-1135) and cancelling Group Counsellor III, position P02, Salary Level 337 (1030=1252). Can be effective day following Board action. Asst.Personnel- i rector Recommendation of County Administrator /Date: December 15, 1975 Add one (1) Group Counsellor II, Salary Level 305 ($934- $1, 135); and cancel one (1) Group Counsellor III, position number 02, Salary Level 337 ($1,030-$1,252), effective December 17, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors p E C 1 G 075 Adjustment APPROVED 0.1 on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk C 1 6 i 975 Date: BEL — By: Rondalynn Shq kles Deputy Lierk APPROVAL oa tiv:6 adjubtme►tt cc)zatitutes an Apprwptiati.on Adjubtment mud Pv.6onn Resotuti.on Ameulmvt. �UG3� MN :.r7x t: POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: �y�I Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 256 Date 11/19/75 Action Requested: Cancel ChPrlfflG rnisnatrhor pnnitinn uA.?S6-nQ7n?Q (back-ma position for Constance Dorsey) Proposed effective date: Explain why•adjustmept is needed: ('n.,sr nrP .,rSe� iv�a nen CPr1.�0 PeLed__ z, disability retireaent effective 8/6/75 Estimated cost of adjustment: r' Amount: EQ Cot�,f 1 . Salaries and wages: R[CElV,: 2. Fixed Assets: (t a# .i,,tem6 and co4rt) ••�+ e 4. 41 65, , n of S Estimated total - - Signature -7,0_ N'p"artfnenfzHead Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: November 24 197 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County A s t Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 5. 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Sheriff's Dispatcher. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling I Sheriff's Dispatcher, position 120, Salary Level 273 (847-1030). Can be effective day. following Board action. Sheriff's Dispatcher position #20 was established to replace an employee in the class of Sheriff's Dispatcher while on leave of absence. The employee has now resigned, and the position is no longer necessary. Asst. Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: December 15, 1975 Cancel one (1) Sheriff's Dispatcher, position number 20, Salary Level 273 ($547-+1,030, effective December 17, 1975, County Admin Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED (0f5AP#%@*0) on J. R. OL.SSON. County Clerk Date: 0EC 1 G 1975 By: Rondnlynn Sbsac les -�?'jty-Clerk APPROVAL o f #lu,a adjustment eonat itutea an Appnopnia ion AdjuAtment and Pmonnet Reaotation Amendme►tt. r► lemented, when Pon,=I �9 Y t POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Walnut Creek-Danville Department Municipal Court Budget Unit 214 Date 11-17-75 Action Requested: Fill Deputy Clerk Grade III Position 006 and cancel Deputy Cterk Grade tT Pos=on 008. Proposed effective date: 12-1-75 Explain why adjustment is needed: -Pursuant to reguest of this departmgnt autbnri Y to fill vacant Grade III position was previously withheld because of lack of eligible list; cancellation of Deputy Clerk II position will coincide with promulgation of new Deputy Clerk III list on 11-25-75 Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: Contra Costa County 1 . Salaries and wages: RECEIVED S 798.00 2. Fixed Assets: (tet items and coat) Env 1 s1:17 None rtice of Esti dCtateol ini5t. 1-r $ 798.00 Signat. A 46POWN—ROY L. CffIESA Depar n Head Clerk and Administrator Initial Determ"nation of County Administrator Date: November 20, 1975 To Civil Service: 11, Request recommendation. 1774 I'l Cu_nty_ Ami-n-Is-fr-alor Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: December 9, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Deputy Clerk III and cancel I Deputy Clerk 11. Study discloses duties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification as Deputy Clerk III. Can be effective day following Board action. - The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of 1 Deputy Clerk III, Salary Level 270 (839-1020) and the cancellation of 1 Deputy Clerk II, position #08, Salary Level 206 (691-839). ksst- Personnel Wrector Recommendation of County Administrator gate: December 15, 1975 Add one (1) Deputy Clerk III, Salary Level 270 ($839-$1,020), and cancel one Deputy Clerk II, Position number 08, Salary Level 206 ($691-$839), effective December 17, 1975. County AdffniKtillator Action of the Board of Supervisors . 't*- on DFr i r. iz:l5 Adjustment APPROVED j. R. OLSWN tCounty Clerk DEC 1 A 1975 BY: �A 3 a62 IDate: Rondolynn Shaces uepu;y MR APPROVAL .-4 zdjusbruilt consti-tuteA jut AWtop-tiation Adjustinent and PWonneZ 4 Resotation A!nCJ-'&n0=t. 00037 r+ section section and reverse sidp nT 01111111'IN 111 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State Of California Auu uit.. %J-I " G1erK 11, Level 206 ($$691Yt+iai1_svu uuuL� and cancel -$839), effective December 17, 1975. A County ni t a o r Action of the Board of Supervisors on DFS. 1 C 19`5 Adjustment APPROVED ` !. R, Of.SSpN' County Clerk DEC 1 a 1975 By: uepury Setv. Date: �„dolynn F►a es an App top tii a ion Ad f ubtme►r t and FeA6 onne2 APPROVAL . <„ t,iti,� �zd j 'c'vt eof:a t teA OOCJ37 Rzsozatie12 4sc►:dn:�+zt• Tom section ani ide In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 79 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROtr£D. PASSED by the Board on December 1006, 1075. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this ' r� day of December , 1975 affixed tWas Of December , 7 97 7J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By K / n1Deputy Clerk Ponnie Foaz H 24 app lam 00038 a ' z t CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund BudoetUnit Object Sub.Acct. CR X IN 66) SELECT ROAD CONSTRUCTION 01 K03 661-7600 570 4, Marsh Creek Road 3200 381 5. Camino Pablo 4800 298 7. S.P. Dam Rd 7100 997 5. Frontage Imp 4800 995 4. Design Eng 3200 987 7. Slide Repair 7100 MINOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION 5-76 0 216 6. Tri Lane RW 500 995 6. Design Eng 500 AID TO CITIES 685-3580 024 2. County Club Dr fm 666 9500 MINOR ROAD BETTERMENTS 66-76 1 0 225 I. Rolph Park Court 5800 325 2. Country Club Dr to 685 7200 990 1,2,3. Betterments 11900 326 3. Muth Drive 3800 PROOF _Comp._ _ _K_P_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY I. W.O. 6088 Construct 501 of grate covered concrete lined Date Descf+ptron ditch with curb outlet box at Ro I ph Park Dr• 2. W.O. 6384 Construct outfall structure for 7211 CMP at San Leandro Creek Subdivision 4432.- Work within Town of Morega. 3. W.O. 4749 Installation of a sub-surface drain at No. 6 Muth Drive, Orinda. 4. W.O. 43.01 Preliminary Engineering for widening of exist- APPROVED: SIGN R DATE ing bridge and pavement at M.P. 19.87. AUDITOR— IQ_I�._�� 5. W.O. 4258 County participation with PG&E for curbing CONTROLLER: and landscaping at Brookwood intersection. COUNTY 6. W.O. 4113 Right of Way settlement and removal of two ADMINISTRATOR: 1Y� rE dead trees in EI Sobrante area, 7. W.O. 5836 Slide investigation and repair 2.5 miles BOARD U49= I� t: north of Bear Creek Road (Contract awarded YES: `mss 11/24/75). NO:.000 9— r T J. R. OLSSON CLERK � � �� b4fli ;/:",(�� /A/lC./� , Public Works Director 12/10/5 Rondaly ell__-t,l�t Srgnorure Title Date Approp.Adj. �{J} M 129 Rev. 2,oS) Dep;ay Clerk Journal No. • �r•° I,rstrnuions on f;errse Sidr ��rw^ tr . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Public Works Increase RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE O$JECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease I CR X IN 661 ACCOUNT Cnrd Special FundArt. Code Quontit 1 Bud etUnrt Object Sub T, r— I "G •'AIN7FNANI'E DISTRICT 4 Town of Moraga• r r r rr 3. W.O. 4749 Installation of a sub-surface drain at No. 6 Muth Drive, Orinda. APPROVED: SIGN R 4' W•0. 4301 Preliminary AUDITOR- DATE Engineering for widening of exist- s• W. ing bridge and pavement at M.P. 19.87, CONTROLLER: 19-11-21 0. 4258 County participation with PGbE for . COUNTY ~- and landscaping at Brcurbing ADMINISTRATOR.V '►t 'ell"t7ftr� 6• W.O. 4113 Right of Way Settlement1atBrookwood intersection. dead trees in EI Sobrantend removal area. of two BOARD SUPERVI 7. W•0. 5836 Slide investigation and repair YES: Hoggem xoslarV. north of Bear Creek Road (Contract miles 11/24/75). awarded NO:.()On e •��. J. R. OLSSON CLERK r Ronda) �Lr.l, , Pub l i s Works 0 i rectort',,^�,� M 129 Rev. 2;6S) Title Signature ,�� l�put Title Y Gerk MDate prop.Ads. brstructinns on Rererse Side Journal No_ t�4;r39 ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Pub t is Works RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2_ DBJECT OF EXPEySE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Decrease Increase Code C}uantit ) Fund Bud etUn t 03 ect Sub Acct. (CR X IN 66) STORM DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 4 01 till 110-7700 606 1. RW Olive Or Drain - till 1000 7712 605 1 . Olive Or Drain - till 1000 COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-7 2753 2753-7713 025 2. Paint Comm Ctr fm Dal 330 001 2. Leasehold Impry to 025 330 ROAD MAINTENANCE YARDS 1003 654-7754 035 3. Drying Rack - sign shop 75 ROAD MAINTENANCE 671-2470 3. Constr.Materibls - Jobs 75 COUNTY AIRPORT 1401 841-7712 606 4. Const wash fac 3889 601 4. Runway reconstruct 3889 PROOF _K_P_ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY 1. W.O. 8521 To provide right of way funds for Olive Dr. Dote Desct ption storm drain project. 2. W.O. 5254 To provide funds to complete the painting of the Orinda Community Center. 3. Additional to cover actual bid price of drying rack. APPROVED: SIGN RES DATE 4. W.O. 5511 To cover expenditures on completed W.O. AUDITO CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Awervimn Benny. Dlas" mnii:►rty. Bog'(gear. IAraschelrL J. R. OLSSON CLERK b1 ^ /[/!/ /1! /} Public Works Director 12/10/75 S. oture Title Date Rondo ynn Shackles Apprap.Adj. �Q 1 M 129 Rev. 2,66) Deputy Clerk Journal Na, P � �et: Inslrucliuns uu Ret erse Side r , j i,a CONTRk COSTA COUNTY 0 APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Cord Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMIncrease u Fnd Decrease Code Quandt ) Budoet Unit Object Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) 01 1206 113-7710 506 Re-roof Orinda 2,564 01 1206 113-?710 711 replace glass San Ralson 2,564 PROOF C°""?__ K_P}_ VER., 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay,fist item and cast of each) TOTAL �' To cover cost of re-roofing ENTRY Date Description Orinda Library APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE As AUDITOR.--- UDITOR CONTROLL ER,-5d' _Z'djr COUNTY CD ADMINISTRATOR: • BOARD OF SUPERVISORSDEf�ortY. YES; supervisors KennY. : Boggess. Linse!IIA- L) LC 161975 .. J. R. OLSSON CLERK Signatu*e Title Date Rondalynn Shackles Approp.Adj. Q, � Journal N , M 124 Rev. 2.'651 PUty Clerk do. - See instructions on Rererse Side fij; f l N '4 i. U ' Journal No. j M 1?9 Rev. ?:651 A tY Clerk ��,�, instructions on Ret erre Side (lt,041 ••, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY S APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Auditor-Controller-Purchasing RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Code Quantity) Fund Budoet Unit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66)- 0 1 6)O1 1003 020-2479 Other Spec Depmtl Expense 1686 01 1003 020-1013 Temporary Salaries 1686 �v PROOF _Comp.__ _K_P__ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To provide funds to cover anticipated expenditures Date Description in Temporary Salaries through June 30, 1976. APPROVED: SIGNATUES DATE AUDITOR- OV 2 8 75 CONTROLLER: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERV $ORS.O R,+:utt. tp. YES: supervison ettn1. . Bolmess, lAnsrltel& J. R. OLSSON CLERK ;f Admin. Svcs. Officer 11/26/ Title Dote 7$ Rond ynn S ockles fr S. Approp.Adj. Journal No. v�' ( M 129 Rev. 2:68 1 "La'�rY Clerk • . ee instructions on Res erse Side noni11'A U t!_ *Jr f`. a ury ' Journal No. I M 129 Rev. 2.68) • Ser Instructions on Rex erse Side OU 42 MEM'IRAW CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT Page 2 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Automotive $ Radio Equipment Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEMDecrease Increase Code puontit ) Fund $udoetUnix Object Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) Radio Facilities (l:ont'd) 01 1 1003 OSS-77SS 009 Dispatch Deskset 550 01 1120 994-9970 contingency Reserve-Revenue Sharing 25,940 Fund 01 1003 990-9970 Contingency Reserve-General Fund 2S,940 Contra Costa County RECEIVED otiice of County A6--.inistrator Otk3 ♦ e4 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT Automotive & Radio Equipment RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantit ) Fund BudoetUnit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) Sheriff 01 2 1003 25S-7753 004 10torcycle Tran to 063-7753-014 3,608 1 1003 2SS-7753 001 Van Tran to 063-7753-005 5,932 Bork Furlough Center 1 1120 303-7753 024 Van Tran to 063-7753-005 6,000 3 1120 303-7753 023 Sedan 'lean to 063-77S3-006 13,500 Equipment Operations 2 1003 063-7753 005 Van 12 Passenger 11,932 3 063-7753 006 Sedan Patrol 13,500 2 063-7753 019 `lotorcycle 3,608 Sheriff 1 255-7755 005 Tranceiver XW to 055-7758-010 1,300 1 255-7758 OS3 Tranceiver FM to OSS-7758-020 740 4 2SS-77SS OSS Handi-Talkie to 055-7758-021 3,380 Work Furlough Center 3 1120 303-77SS 025 Walkie Talkie to OSS-7758-021 2,520 Q 1140 303-7758 027 Tranceiver VHF to 055-7758-010 3,920 Marshal `•!t. Diablo 3 1003 260-77SS 008 Receiver-Scanner to 055-7755-022 750 Marshal Walnut Creek-Danville 3 264-77SS 003 Radio-Scanner to 055-7758-022 650 Building Ins ector 1 340-77SE 006 Remote Station to OSS-7758-009 S50 Radio Facilities S 055-7758 010 Tranceiver YHF 5,220 1 055-77S8 020 Tranceiver F1 740 7 OSS-77SS 021 Eandi-Talkie 5,900 v 6 Y OSS-77SS 022 Receiver-Scanner 1,400 PROOF _So:"p_•__ _K_P_ _VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capital outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL ENTRY To transfer automotive and radio equipment from various budget units, whose requests for these items were Date Description adopted by the Board of Supervisors, to the Equipment As Above Operations & Radio Facilities budget units which will purchase these items and control their repair and replacement. Equipment in the new Work Furlough Center was budgeted as Revenue Sharing Fund expenditure with the transfer they will be budgeted as General Fund APPROVED: SIGN RES DATE items. Chargebacks for use of these items will be AUDITOR— made to the pork Furlough Center (Revenue Sharing Fund) . CONTROLLER: r ' 12/5/75 COUNTYYL'rl' ADMINISTRATOR: r r r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: 'upemuors 1{ m ety, lims, :alar :i Ly. Boggess, L TISCII .I. DL"( 16 79-,'5 NO:.N>19, on J. R. OLSSON CLERK Budget Analyst 12/5/75 _ Si azure Title Dore Randal nn Shackles C. D. �I Z.k' PS01 Approp.Adi. 5069 i M 129 Rev. 2 o61 Deputy aedc Journal No. • Ser instructions an Rererse Side Ct 4 4 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOR AUDITOR-CONTROLLER'S USE Office of Emergency Services 362 Card Soeciol ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Cade O:,antity) F rnd BudoetUn+t Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 66) D! /003 36.2 z,�7924?9 eZhZ,e .SPEeii 2 $ 420 0/ 1003 362 7758 O i 1 -7-;58-887— 'fpb/!v E•llclo SUPE $ 420 PROOF Camp._ K_F'_ VER._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay, list items and cost of each) TOTAL "- - — This adjustment is necessary to improve and enlarge ENTRY Radio enclosure, Co. Tag No. 92873, because it will not Date Pescr,pticr, accomodate all of the radio components for which it was intended. Expensive components will be stored without adequate protection until the additional enclosure parts are acquired. APPROVED: SIGNATURES DATE ALDI TOR AP C0%'ti OL LER: r COUNTI �,��� ADMINISTRATOR: f'��'"'�' 00 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER. y[-S: aupem1imrs Kenny. Dism 161orlar tv 8a�ag. Lia�;t.'tid RK hi I I N. Perry Director 12-4- 5 Rondolynn Shock)es Signatures Title Dote Deputy Clerk _Ap�►op i No. 0� Al 129 Re.. ?,6S) • See Iestrrctions on Reverse Side a0G4J IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the natter of the ) Proposed Granting of a ) Franchise in the ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1012 Oakley area. ) RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENTION TO ADVERTISE AND SELL A FRANCHISE FOR PIPELINES IN COUNTY HIGHWAYS The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: 1. A written application has been made to the Board for a franchise as more particularly described in the attached "Notice of Sale of Franchise,"and it is proposed to grant one or more such franchise(s) in the manner provided by law, substantially in the form and upon the terms and conditions set forth in the attached "Notice of Sale of Franchise" and Ordinance No. 1827, and it is in the public interest to give this notice. 2. The County Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise by publishing the attached "Notice of Sale of Franchise" in The Antioch Daily Ledger, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in this County, once a day for ten (10) successive days, or as often during said period as said paper is published, with full publication to be completed not less than twenty (20) nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date upon which the Board will receive sealed written bids for the franchise, substantially in the following form: NOTICE OF SALE OF FRANCHISE (Pipelines in County Roads) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: I. Applications have been made to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, for a franchise to install pipelines in the Oakley area, from the intersection of Lone Tree Way and Empire Avenue, northerly in the right of way of Empire Avenue to Laurel Road; thence, easterly in the right of way of Laurel Road to the Contra Costa Canal right of way, for a term of forty (40) years, and this Board proposes to offer it for sale and to grant by resolution, to the highest biddders, one or more non-exclusive franchises to install pipelines in the following approximate locations for a term of forty (40) years substantially as set forth in Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 1827. II. Sealed written bids will be received for said franchise up to 11:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 20, 1976, in Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Cali- fornia, when and where any and all sealed bids will be opened; that all bids must be for payment of a stated sum in the minimum amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000); that a franchise will be sold and awarded to the persons, firms, or corporations making the highest cash bid therefor for each franchise; that at the time of the opening of the bids any person, firm, or corporation, who in the opinion of the Board is responsible, present, or represented, may bid for the franchise a sum not less than ten percent (10%) above the highest sealed bid therefor, and the bid so made may be raised not less than ten percent (10'%) by any other responsible bidder, and the bidding may so continue until the franchise is finally sold and awarded to the highest responsible bidder thereof. III. Each sealed bid shall be accompanied with cash or a certified check payable to the County Treasurer for the full amount of the bid, and no sealed bid shall be considered unless said cash or check is enclosed therewith. The successful bidder shall deposit at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of his bid with the County Clerk before the franchise is sold and awarded to him. If the successful bidder fails to make the deposit immediately, his bid shall not be received, and is void, and the franchise shall then and there be again offered for sale to the bidder who made the next highest cash bid therefor, subject to the same conditions as to deposit as abovementioned. This procedure shall be had until the franchise is sold and awarded to a bidder who makes the necessary deposit of at least ten percent (10%) of the amount of his bid as herein urovided. RESOLUTION N0. 75/1012 00046 IV. Within twenty-four (24) hours�of the acceptance of his bid, the successful bidder(s) shall deposit with the County Clerk the remaining ninety percent (90%) of the amount thereof and pay the amount of publication costs incurred by the County in connection with the call for bids on this franchise and the publishing of the franchise ordinance and on failure to do so the award of the franchise shall be set aside and the deposit shall be forfeited, and no further proceedings for a sale of the franchise shall be had unless it is readvertised and again offered for sale in the manner herein- above provided. PASSED ON December 16, 1975 unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: Public Works Director County Counsel County Auditor County Administrator -2- RESOUMON NO. 75/1012 0069V IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMM, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the Map of Subdivision 4650, ) RESOLUTION N0. 75/1013 San Ramon Area. ) WHEREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4650, property located in the San Ramon area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Boise Cascade Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, P. 0. Box 10100, Palo Alto, CA 94303, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bonds (No. 202 16 87) issued by Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, with Boise Cascade Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, as principal, in the amount of $50,700 for Faithful Performance and $51,200 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 131491, dated December 10, 1975), in the amount of $500, deposited by: Boise Cascade Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, P. 0. Box 10100, Palo Alto, CA 94303. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1975-76 tax lien has been paid in full. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the drainage release from Boise Cascade Corporation, A Delaware Corporation, dated December 9, 1975, for said subdivision is also accepted. PASSED BY THE BOARD on December 16, 1475. Originating Department: Public works cc: Subdivider County Auditor-Controller Tax Collector's Office Director of Planning Public Works Director RESOLUTION NO. 75/1013 xAjO48 v s� I SUBDIVISION AGREMEW (§1) Subdivision: 4650 (B. F P. Code §§11611-12) (§1) Subdivider: eaise Cascade Corporation a Delaware corporation 1) Effective Date: (0) Completion Period: I year (§4) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc.) 1. (faithful performance & maintenance) $ 50,700 - • 2. (labor $ materials)$51,200 1. PARTIES & DATE. Effective on the above date, the. County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the abovenamed Subdivider, rutually promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. IMPROI'EMENTS. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road and ® _street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9, and including future amendments, and 411 improvements required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the Courtr's Public forks Dep.-zrtrent. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivision Map Act (4usiness & Professions Code §§11500 and folloc:ing), in a good work- manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a garner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GUARANTEE $ MAINTENANCE. Subdivider guarantees .that the work is and will be free from defects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance with Article 94-4.4 of the- County Ordinance erode; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMPROI'EIMM SECURITY: DEPOSIT & BONDS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business & Professions Code §11612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $500 casks; and.... B. Bonds, etc.: (1 - faithful performance & maintenance) additional security for at least the above-specified amount, which is the total estimated cost of the work less $500, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agreement and maintenance of the work: for one year after completion and acceptance thereof against any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2- labor & materials) another such additional security in at least the above-specified amount, which is the full -:mount of said estimated cost, securing payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. 5. WARRANTY. Subdivider warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this work as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's 6 resolution of completion for the subdivision, the improvement plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. '00049 Microfilmed with board order F . ., ^ MWT Ei %1 fsi 6. NO {tiAIVER BY COUNTY. ' Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or- employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or-materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising -from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. . 7. INMNITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. • The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are -any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of- actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or'. any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. D. Aon-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification.covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURITYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. NONPERFOR:NLANCE k%'D COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor immediately upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Subdivider shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. 11. ASSIGNME\T. If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing thea. r t . 00050 Microfilmed with-board order - 2 - y 4T t., i - 2 - 12. - RECORD 11AP, In consideration hereof, -Countyshall allow Subdivider ' to file and recor2 the Final cap for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - VICTOR W. SAUER, . Public Works Director By non L. ine,� Chief Deputy Public Works Director • .RECOMMENDED FOR-APPROV SUBD11'IDER: (See rote below) • Boise 4� ade CorpogAUoa, - By Dwa&e carpo r By 5 -/.IV%01( <,rz ' (DesYknate ictat capac yin the business)- Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment - _ fom below; and (2) If a corporation, affix corporate seal. FORM APPROVED: JOIE B. CLAUSEN ' County Counsel - Deputy (CORPORATE SEAL) :t State of California ) ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County of Santa Clara ) or Individual) - On December 9, 1975 the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before re and acknowledged to me that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership nP.ed above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) UL r11Tlt'aa�A,t•. �� - WTA,?f Rl9UC•CAUF- SAKTA CLARA t; UNTT ly C:r"�..Ea*i..s�►�s- 13. i�a Notary Public for said County and State. (Subdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) - (LD-9; Rev. 3/74) _ Microfilmed with board order 3 - ' 00051 •w rpt,. nw, .:. ..4.. -. '. To•as c .. - (Corporation) STATE GF Q%LIFORNIA COUNTY OF Santa Clara Ss. On December 9, 1975, before we.the nedessismd.a Notary Pnblu in and for said . Y State, personally appeared .K+r9e c n►,In • u known to me to be the C r_ Vi cle President.Bill!------------------------- 1 = ienoaw-tsrwrta be — t«7 of the aorpocseion that ween a the within Iastsnmeat. u known to me to be the persons who executed the within iInstrument on behalf of the corporation therein named. and t acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board n of directors. OIVKMASEAL WITNESS my hand and ol5eial seal, PATRICIA J.JACOUES ' ~ WTARY PUBLIC-CALIF. Signa( �• t c-� e • SANTA CLARA COUNTY Ur Catadweis Espiwa Ane. 1]„ 1976 f Name (Typed or Printed) Mtcrohimed Wllh board order tnr ere..r Gild aaraw Man STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. QTY AM County of 'It A ' 31MAx4mam_ On this 9TH day of DECEMBER in the year One Thousand Nine Hundred and SEVENTY FIVE 3 before me, PILAR L RENO , a Notary Public in and for the CITY AMID County of RAM FRAMC M , State of California, residing E therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared PILAR L. REMO HOLLY E_ HALL .' NOFANY WILIGCALIFORNIA known to we to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument � ' CITY AND COUNTY OF as the attorney of SAN FRANCISCO FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK, N.J. (a Corporation) My Commission Expires April 26. 1977 and acknowledged to rite that he subscribed the name of said Corporation thereto as surety and his own name as attorney_. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal at my office in the said Qf AjM County of SAW FRa►IN'MMoM the day and year in this certificate first itten. Notary Public in and for the CIT4 A2CD Count3 of California I MY Commission Expires MY OOMMIMON EZr=M APRIL 26, 1W Pac Bond 2923 A 2236-.oe»rea e»U.S.A. s W052 Microfilmed with board order r; BOND NO. SND 202 16 37- IMPBONFEME?-r? SEMMIiY BOND (Faithful Pa:-formarce 3 !Maintenance,• AND Labor & Uaterials) (CaZif. Bus. Prof. Code §ZZ612; Contra Costa County Standard Form) Z. OBL TGATIOP:. (Pri ncipaT) Boise Cascade Corporation, a Delaware ddrporatl6d ' ' " ' ' ' aS Principal, and Jur2;;J Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey a corporation organized and existing under bare la xs of the State of New Jersey and authorized to transact surety business in California, as Surety, Hereby jointly and severally b±nd ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and ass_g^s to the County of Contra Costa, California, to pay it: (A - raithru�' 'ezr ormance, & •:aintenance) FiftySeven HundrCd _ _ _ _ _ Dollars C$• s6,-7oo:oo for itself or any Cizy-assignee under the below-cited subdivision contract, plus (B - Labor &mlzteria.ls) Fifty-One Thousand Two Hundred - - - - - Dollars ($ 51,200:00• Tor the benefit of persons protected under Cal: Bus.&Prof.Code Sll 22. 2, REC174LS. The 'rincipal contracted with the County on to install and pay for street, drainage, and other improvements in Subdivi- sion No. 4650 , as per map no:, bei::,--, filed with the County's Recorder, and to complete said z:ork' within one year from said date, all in accordance with Sta:.e and local laws, rulings thereunder and the subdivision- contract. 3. COND PION. If the Principal faithfully performs all things required of him acro ing, to the termas and co_^_di4ions of said contract- and imrovement plan and improvements agreed on by rim and the County, • then this obligation as to Section 1-(A) above shall become null and void, except that the guar- antee of maintenance continues for the one-year period; and if he fully pays the contractors, subcont"r_ctors, and pe„so:s rert_nr eauitpment or furnishing . .Labor or materials to them for said work and improvement, and protects the premises from claims of such liens, the:: this obligation as to Section 1-(B) above shall become null and void; othex-dise this obligation regains in full force and effect. No' alteration of said contract or any owns or specifications of said :pork agreed to. by the Principal and the County shall relieve-any Surety A. lia- bility on th;s bond; and consent is hereby given to make such alterations without fuz taar noticL- to or consent by Surety; and the Surety hereby *naives the provIsions of Calif. Civil Code §2819, and 'holds itself bound wi hout regard to and independent.1y of any actio: against Principal whenever taken, and ag^r•_s .that '__ Co,—,,i'4-.y sues o., this bond Surety will pay reasonable attor- ney fees �.�.�: d, by court to be taxed as costs and included in the judgment.. S?C3�D A`-D f_LAR D on December 9, 197 PRi�iCT� � SURETY _ Boise'Cl code CrRorfftiQn, .Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, ` } �/''/ thew Jersey 'J Holly E. Hall Attorney -- `-_ SZ' �: 1' f. _ Y 7C State o-' California ) ss. ' Connt y of ) (ACL•.'70;,LEDGVZZrT B; SURE_y) On the perzoa(s) :-:hose na=e(s) is/are signed above for Sur-_ y --and w.11.o Is kncwn to me to be t're At:.or:±ey(s)-in-Fac;, for thys C0 t)O -,t2 .•11.ei.y, _ e vv a?ly %AJCare^ JC_'O.@ :Ie 2%G' 3Ciii10ifl E'G9.> to :..e `P:Zt he/they signed the r_a=e of th..e Corporation as Surety and his/their own name(s) as its At4torney(s)-'n-Fact. 1• r Notary Public for said County and State (.imp. Scc..'sord,-CCC Std.rorty) S;Ba V. 8-,C 7; co) Microfilmed with �0r 53 er F ,n:a. . . . EDWARD W.LEAL - dt.FAED P LOUL-L r Conunlr Treasurer-Tax collector Assistant Coaaty Tteasuses- TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE - Tax Contactor Fust bof Taxes CONTRA COSTA COUNTY rust Installment of Taxes Due andnd Parable Detinqueat on the First Day of November oo the Tenth Day of December ------------- MARMEZ.CALIFORNIA Second Installment of Taxes Phone ZU'-1wo.Est.2395 seeand installment of Tries Due and Parable November 19 1975 Detlnquent on the First Day of February a on the Tenth Day of Apdt IF THIS TW-LCT- IS AOT FILED BY F.BRUM 282 19 76 p THIS LETIM IS VOID . DEC 11975 RECEVVED This xill certify that I have exudned the map of the pM=ed subdivision entitled: - • TRACT NO. 4650 . and have determined from the official tax records that there are - no unpaid county taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the Imp. The current 1975-76 tau lien has been paid is full. EDWHD W. 1A'L Tax Collector - i By: UC . Deputy dl - y Microfilmed with board order H - 00054 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Natter of Program Sup- ) plement No. 3 to Local Agency - ) State Agreement No. 1 for a ) Federal-Aid Railway - Highway ) RESOLUTION N0. 75/1014 Grade Crossing improvement, ) Project No. 7351A-4322-76 ) ) WHEREAS the Board has considered Program Supplement No. 3 to the Local Agency - State Agreement No. I for a Federal -Aid Railway - Highway Grade Crossing Improvement (pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1973) ; and WHEREAS said Supplement provides for 90 percent Federal , ten percent local , funding for the installation of automatic gate, arms and flashing light signals at the Southern Pacific Transporta- tion company railroad crossing of Balfour Road , Brentwood area, the estimated total project cost being $42,000, County share $4 ,200; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLVED that the aforesaid Supplement No. 3 to the Local Agency - State Agreement is APPROVED and Supervisor W. N. Boggess , Chairman, is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, ', 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller County Administrator State Department of Transportation Southern Pacific Transportation Company P RESOLUTION N0. 75/1014 0005 Count of Contra Costa - LOCAL AG MCT nATs 11-20-7 SUrrLwsNT No. 3 TO LOCAL ACiNCT - STAT►. ACatwtNT NO. 1 PRr%GRAM Of LOCAL AGENCY FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS In the Countv of Contra Costa Mcal Zgency Pursuant to the Federal Highway Safety Act, the attached "Program" of Federal Aid Projects marked "Exhibit B" is hereby incorporated in that Master Agreement for the Federal-Aid Program which was entered into between the above named LOCAL AGENCY and the STATE on April 15, 1975 and is subject to all of the terms and conditions t ereof. The subject program is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 of Article II of the aforementioned agreement under authority of MM>by/County Resolution No. 75/1014 approved by the Board of Supervisors on - DecembeF 16, 1975 (see copy attached) . County o ontra Costa /Local A y N. Boggass Chairman, Board of Supervisor; Attest 3. R OLSSON ce..t By It ING&IgAX DepUty CWW Approved for Stag HEINZ HECKEROTH Assistant Director, Highways By Chief.Office of Lsc sslsuwce Depwupent of traaspo talion Microfilmed with board order Form DH-OLA-431 (5-75) 00056 i 1 CD Cd Cy 4.3 4..') O r •w Uco co a WO i $4 ` 4-> S"•O CE cis -ri O 'O O U cb 4-� O riCCcN s; Cn� �OO O o,. C -i co J co 4 u O c• c0 4> a3 C%l d E �.of.� E O S. d i.fr to C :a. H a c o �H bo E) 1�'d U O O Cl �+ .c era '• r-i C O M C `.�'Q Ca O u 7 ; -� f. 3 b cd E +'043.�+ m V �� QjQOCf. 0 > `ri �� c6 N < o r-1 CIS O aT o a cc + U) «] Ca H •'� � o wd cis-d' E C V 'd f. R. Q __ 1a 0 O O � U) U "� [z.43 b U-H rl s -4 (D O U •0 r3 ay 43-p f. 4.11 C v L. O Cn 4-1 O to a) a)•ri p E ctf i. U O CH W. 43 U).0 s,-• ©r� a.> r. a O oM ij3• Y0 O 'a 4j tLD P (d 11 +� Y1 W O 'dtn rim o 'co 43 C C ri 43 v m to U to � U w (s V ca-4-O�'d r4 U to 'n Ch E - V) o Q. ° O S. CL4 aUi a� ice. s3.Uc o CO o (L) " Q, �1 o cCdr. O U m W 43 O -0 C a —R+ -, t+ O Q a Na O a Sa CaU -r 43 43 -A � J O � E� 4 �o � aso = o �43w a) (1) W c O 430 E�p S, oc V'c� t 1.t 43 -1b O S4 r♦U �. ' U CLO CES r-1 r-f q a C cis z s i3+� E 43 H - � � � 3 w to m U �'Ud Q cu a; Q C O v '"S4 -10 O U as U Q Q iYC V) 3 , US4 gas a, C.)U Cd z Cc Cd 43' + OCO W O 3�4 • 4.'l bDG.0 � � o9 CO0 4.3 �? U) r0 ww cQ H c °C bor U (1) 11 E 43 — 't �S. � � �-{ ° p c� GOCCf�3 E-4 J3 E a o 0 0� 4.3 Cd-AV S. P, 30 > < -4.1 M to a U ca O Ul-A rl L` ob 4314 � O CIS W. ¢. S.-r4 43 4_� Cif a. C c.C C 0 •C?� cd 4a c tO^ 0 3 0 O w Sr E O •0 � UCa) •^ O C °'d .H-ir� a) cEa� ° bO Wo- --� ae) cd ca O C E S cd 43 43 O S tncho N S4 `�C7 to E to C OED t) > 'U U CO r-4 v •� c H U a: H cd fF1>< C 0.1-_ 0 O w a cu a! S. sJ-`11d -rl > M > � Eizoto. Eos. c O p H C s •� O C� z '!. -rt -rt W > a cis >04 WFa c•. > CW w, us a) as p � L � ! �J �xs.to 4) I 43 c Oa)41 ho 0.0r4 WuI / -. s CO m w 4 :5-C MI ,A o c. a.%0 E,cn :. c !:E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Annexation ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/10 .5 No. 75-11 to County Service ) Area L-45 ) (Gov. C. §556320, 56322, 56323, 56450) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE IN ORGANIZATION BY ANNEXATION NO. 75-11 TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-45 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On November 12, 1975 this Board adopted Resolution No. 75/ 905 initiating proceedings for change in organization by Annexation No. 75-11 to County Service Area L-45. Annexation No. 75-11 and County Service Area L-45 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This change in organization by Annexation No. 75-11 to County Service Area L-45 had been proposed by the representatives of the owners by application and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission between October 1 and October 10, 1975. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended street lighting services. On November 5, 1975 the Local Agency Formation Commission approved proposed Annexation No. 75-11 to County Service Area L-45 subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said Commission also declared the said territory to be legally inhabited and assigned the proposal the designa- tion of "Annexation No. 75-11 to County Service Area L-45". This Board fixed 10:45 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 1975 as the time for a public hearing on the annexation of the above said territory. Notice of said hearing was duly given by (1) publication in "The Valley Pioneer", (2) posting on the Board's Bulletin Board, and (3) mailing notice to all persons and counties, cities, or districts which had filed a written request for special notice with the Clerk of the Board. This Board, at the time and place set for said hearing, heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud, called for evide:tce or protests as provided for by Government Code Section 56314, and heard and duly considered such evidence and protests . This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest of the people of County Service Area L-45. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is inhabited, and that no land- owner therein filed a written protest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election and without being subject to confirmation by the voters. The Clerk shall file his certificate of comoletion with the Secretary of State in accordance with Gover=enr Code Section 56451 -1- RESOLUTION NO. 75/inc, oV��J ll APPEUDIX "A" I FiP2'ZNL111C "-A' After receipt of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing for this matter, the Clerk is directed to record a counterpart original of the Clerk's certificate of completion and the original or counterpart original of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing with the Contra Costa County Recorder in accordance with Government Code $56453. PASSED on December 16, 1975 by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. REK:s cc: Secretary► of State State Board of Equalization County Administrator County Assessor Public �:orks Director .Rifee, Peters and Jones Civil £rgineerir_g George A. Pflaum, Jr. ProaerCy :•Tanager County Auditor-Controller Recorder P. G. E. -2- RESOLUTION NO. 75/103.5 APPENDIX "A" Jt1059 L(%C,� . AG al CY FOIR-MAYTlai COO XV � Contra Costa Cflunty, Calif, da _ - Description Dates 1115175 Bysl • fiKWMIT "A" - - Annexation 45-11 to Coudty Service Area Lk5 s (Two Parcels) Parcel Che. - • . _. _ _ - _ Being a portion of Rancho San Ramon, described as folloust Beginning at the northwestern most corner of County Service Area Irl--6, said point being on the center Line of Camino.Tassajara •.•- - Road; thence Southerly and Masterly, along the western boundary of County Service Area I-6, 2550 feet, score or less; to the north_ - western corner of TAt 38, Tract 3572, filed July 27;-1966, in 2iap Book 112, at page 11, said point also being ca the southern line.of the parcel of land described in the deed to Crocker Homes Inc., _ recorded July 1, 1974, in Book 72614, of Official Records, page 120,- thence, leaving said westein boundaki of County Service Area if-6, forth - - 89030' West, along the southern line of said Crocker Homes Inc., parcel . (72614 O.R. 120)9 1160 feet,, =ore or less, to the southwestern corner thereof, being the eastern line of Rancho Heights Unit Humber ()nem _ filed April. 5, 1946, in Map Book 21, at page 46; thence northerly-, 'along the western line of said Crocker Home Inc. parcel (72a O.R. 320) and the eastern line of said Rancho Heights Unit Plumber one, 2600 feet, more or less, to the center line of Camino Tassajara (toad; thence, Soutb,_ easterly, along the center line of Camino Tassajara Road, 2350 feat* more or less, to the point of beginning. - Contrinfns 101.72 acres, more or less. - - Parcel 71%;o. Being a portion of Rancho San ReWon, described as follows= Beginning- at a point on the eastern boundary of County Service Area L-45, said point being on the eastern right-of-;:ay line of San Ramon Valley Boulevard; thence, leaving said eastern boundary of - County Service Area 145, Southe-Iy, along said eastern: right-of-way Oouvo Line of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, 360 feet, more or less, to its intersection With the center line of Boone Court; thence Easterly, along the center line of Boone Court, 525 feet, more or less, to the western right-of--:ray line of Interstate 680; thence along said western right.-of-fray line of Interstate 680 as follows; South 3026.17" West, 100 feet, more or less; South 3015114' Fast, 644.27 feet; along a curve to the right, with a radius of 90 feet and an are length of 127.04 feet and South 7?037115" West, 154.61 feet, said point being on the northern line of Sycamore Valley Road; thence, leaving said sight-of-Way line of Interstate 680 and the northern line of Sycamore Valley Road, North 13026905" West, 155.02 feet; thence North 89002116" West, 230 feet, more or less, to the western right-of-way line of San Ramon Valley Boulevard; thence Northerly, along said western right-of-Way line of San Ramon Valley Boulevard 685 f est, more or - less, to its intersection With the eastern boundary of County Service Area L-45; thence Northerly and Easterly, along said eastern boundary of County Service Area 1,45, 535 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 10.5 acres, more or less. - 00OWL r. i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA . In the :!atter of Allvie.y ) RESOLUTION 110. 75/2a6 Annexation to County ) Service Area LIB-10 ) (Gov. C. 5§56320, 56322, 56323, 56450) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE III ORGANIZATION BY THE ALLVIEW ANNEXATIOU TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA LIB-10 T..e Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: ` On November 12, 1975 this Board adopted Resolution NO. 75/0,07 initiating proceedings for change in organization by the Allvie;_ Annexation to County Service Area LIB-10. Allview Annexation and County Service Area LIB-10 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. _ This annexation had been proposed by the City of Pinole and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Comanission on October 10, 1975. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended library services. On November 5, 1975 the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposed Allview Annexation to County Service Area LIB- 10, subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said commission also declared the territory proposed to be annexed as legally inhabited, and assigned the proposal the designation of "Allviez: Annexation to County Service Area LIB-10". This Board fixed 10:45 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 1975 as the time for a public hearing on the annexation of the above said territory. Notice of said hearing was duly given by (1) publica- tion in "The Pinole Progress", (2) posting on the Board's Bulletin Board, and (3) nailing notice to all persons and counties, cities, or districts vhich had filed a written request for special notice ,lith the Clergy: of the Board. This Board, at the time and place sat for said hearing, heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud, called for evidence or protests as ?provided for by Government Code Section 56314, and heard and duly considered such evidence and protests. IN" is Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in t:.e best interest of the people of County Service Area LIB-10. This 34oard hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is in' ab_ted, and that no landowner therein_ filed a written protest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election and :•:_thout being subject to confirmation :^c the voters. ?he Clerk shall file his certificate of completion with the SecreLsry of State in accordance with Government Code Sectio- ,.'56L[51-After receipt of he Secra4ary of Statets certificate of dine' for this matter, t%.e Clerk- is directed to record a counter- nsrL ori71nal of the '_*lark 's certificate of completion and the RESMALUTION 1110. APPENDIX "A2= UU f original or _counterpart original of the Secretary of State's_ certificate of filing with the Contra Costa County Recorder in accordance with Government Code §56453. PASSED on December 16, 1975 by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. cc: Secretary of State State Board of Equalization County Administrator County Assessor Public :forks Director City Clerk, City of Pinole City Manager, City of Pinole County Librarian County Auditor-Controller County Recorder -2 FESOLEM.1Qif #:Q. 75/_10-!!i ?iEK:bw RPPE"fDIX nA" 00063 • r E�]:9IT agk Allviex Annexation to County Service Area LIB-10 (All'vi-eu Annexation to'the City of Pinole, Resolution No. 624) Portion of Lot 12 and all of Lots 13 to 17" inclusive, Ranchitos Del Sobrante, filed June 22, 19431n Hap Book 27, page 56, described - as follows= - Beginning at the northwestern corner of the .46 acre parcel of - laud described in the deed from Gladys S. Platz to George H. Mitche3±; et ux, recorded August 18, 1960 in Book 3685, .of Official Records, - page 475, being a point on the eastern line of Appian Way and a poiiit - on the southern boundary of County Service Area IAB-.10; thence Westerly, Northerly, Easterly, Southerly, Westerly and Southerly along the ; southern boundary of County Service Area M-10 as folloust South 73° 44135" West, 60 feet, more or less, to the western line of said Appian Way; Northerly, along the western boundary of Appian Way, 995 feet, more or less, to the northern Line of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante; South 890 580 East, along said northern line 781.33 feet to the north- eastern corner of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante;-South 10 32* 10" East along the eastern line of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante, 62.9.15 feet; South 90 00, East, along said eastern line of Ranchitos Del Sohrante, 62.00 feet to the southeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Charles Zeigra, et uz, recorded March 14, 1957, in•Book 2947, of Official Records, page 155, South ?9" 091117" West, along the southern line of said Zeigra parcel (2947 O.R. 155), 722.31 feet to the eastern line of Appian Way; Southerly along the eastern line of Appian Way, 145.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 13.30 acres, =ore or less. rrte�,,r�AA it, Wvo4 00064 n .. BOARD OF SUP£RIFISORS, COWRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Oak Knoll ) F.ESOLUT ION 110. 75/10' 17 Road Annexation (E1 Sobrante ) (Gov. C. §556320, 56322, Area) to County Service Area ) 56323, 561150) L-41 ) RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE IN ORGANIZATIONi BY THE OAK KNOLL ROAD AWNEYATION (EL SOBRANdTE AREA) TO COUNTY SERVICE AF.EA L-41 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On November 12, 1975 this Board adonted Resolution No. 75/ 906 initiating proceedings for change in organization by the Oak Knoll Road Annexation (£1 Sobrante Asea) to County Service Area L-41. Oak Knoll ?load annexation and County Service Area L-41 are located entirely within Contra Costa County. This change in organization by the Oak Knoll Road Annexation (El Sobrante Area) to County Service Area L-41 had been proposed by the Board of Supervisors by application and filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission on October 10, 1975. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the said territory with extended street lighting services. On November 5, 1975 the Local Agency Formation Commission annroved the proposed Oak Knoll Road Annexation (El Sobrante Area) to County Service Area L-41 subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said Commission also declared the said territory to be leEally inhabited and assigned the proposal the designation of "C3ak Knoll Road Annexation to County Service Area L-41,, . This Board fixed 10:45 a.m. on Tuesday, December 16, 1975 as the time for a public hearing on the annexation of the above said territory. Notice of said hearir_.; was duly given by (1) publica- tion in- "The E1 Sobrante Herald Bee Press", (2) posting on the Board's bulletin board, and (3) -..ailing notice to all persons and counties, cities, or districts which had filed a written request for special notice with the Cler-: of the Board. This Board, at the time and place set for said hearing, heard the determination of the Local Agency Formation Commission read aloud, called for evidence or protests as provided for by Government Code Section 563111 , and heard and dull* considered such evidence and protests. This Board herety rinds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest or the neopie of Co::nty Service Area L-41. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is inhabited, and t?gat no landowner therein filed a written rrotest. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without election and without being suriect to confirmation ^c -!ie voters. The Clerk shall file his certificate o: completion with the Secretzr,. of State in accordance with aoverrmert Code Section 56451. R£SO=UTION NO. 75/101 �n(( r���•`j A n� X 7.T-T "A" �V V J C e After receipt of the Secretary of State's certificate of :filing for this matter, the Clerk is directed to record a counter- part original of the Clerk's certificate of completion and the original or counterpart original of the Secretary of State's certificate of filing with the Contra Costa County Recorder in accordance with Government Code 556453• PASSED on December 16, 1975, by unanimous vote of Supervisors present. cc: Secretary of State State Board of Equalization County Administrator County Assessor Public Works Director Mr. C. A. Todd 4390 Fieldcrest Drive El Sobrante, California 94804 'County Auditor-Controller ' County Recorder P G E z r S _Z REC:bw RESQLL�TIfJl: t3Q. ?5/t�1'�? 00069 EMIR "Am Allview Annexation to County Service Area LIB-10 (Allview Annexation to ,the City of Pinole, Resolution No. 624) Pbrtion of Lot 12 and all of Lots 13 to 17 inclusive, Ranchitos Del Sobrante, filed June 22, 1945 in Han Book 27, page 56, described as followss Beginning at the northwestern corner of the .46 acre parcel of land described in the deed from Gladys F. Platz to George H. Mitchell; at ux, recorded August 18, 1960 in Book 3665, .of Official Records, page 475, being a point on the eastern line of Appian Way and a point on the southern boundary of County Service Area UB-10; thence Westerly, Northerly, Easterly. Southerly, Westerly and Southerly along the southern boundary of County Service Area LIB-10 as followss South 730 44235" West, 60 feet, more or less, to the western line of said Appian Way; Northerly, along the western boundary of Appian Way, 995 feet, more or less, to the northern line of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante; South 89" 58* Fast, along said northern line 781.33 feet to the north- eastern corner of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante; South 1" 32* 10" Fast along the eastern line of said Ranchitos Del Sobrante, 619.15 feet; South 9" 0011 Fast, along said eastern line of Ranchitos Del Sobrante, 62.00 feet to the southeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Charles Zeigra, at ux, recorded March 14, 1957, in•Book 2947, of Official Records, page 155; South ?9' 091117" West, along the southern line of said Zeigra parcel (2947 O.R. 155), 722.31 feet to the eastern line of Appian Way; Southerly along the eastern line of Appian Way, 145.00 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 13.30 acres, more or less. ON k a,' 'tt VVV� - 2 - northeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to William F. Patey, et ux, recorded June 16, 1971, in Book ", of Official Records, pave 653; thence South 70 50' S?" Fast, along the eastern line of said Patey tiarcel (" Q.R. 663), 127 feet, more or less, to the center of Circle Drive; thence South 650`0-' '"Le' , ?long - the center of Circle Drive, 29 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the northwestern extension of the northeastern line of Parcel "3" as shown on twat certain moo filed September 6, 1963, in ran Book 24 of—License Surveyors haps, at page-2; thence South 270 19' 30" East, along said extension and the northeastern line of said,Parcel "3" (24 L.S.K.-21- 147.17-feet -to the-southeastern_corner of-said Parcel 'B" (24 L.S.H. 2); thence South 360 •55' West, 163.70 Feet to the southernmost corner of Parcel IT" (24 L.S.H. 2) thence South 600 10' East, 3-14.53 feet to the northeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the' deed to Donald G. Rouse, recorded December 13, 1972, in Book 6820, of Official -Records, page 571; thence along the -' eastern line of said Rouse parcel (6320 O.R. 571) as follows: South 210 26' 30" nest 111.10 feet: South 20 22"West, 97.43 feet; South 310 15' East, 84.40 feet and South 390 15' E3st, 75.10 feet to the general northern boundary of the City of Richmond: thence Soutlwes Lerly, along said boundary, P35 feel, more or less, to the southyestern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Qleta Fave Seeley, re- corded April 21, 1972, in Boo's 6635, of Official Records, page 684; thence North 30 37' Fast, 172.33 feet; thence Borth 770 55' West, . 170.68 feet; thence North 120 OS' Fast, 100.10 feet-to the souteeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Vernon A. Schultz, et ux, recorded 11ar ch 6, 19614, in Book 4563, of Cf icial F.ecords, page 5141; thence North 710 42' 30" Hest, alone the southern line of said Schultz parcel (4564 O.R. 5141), 236.1 feet to the eastern boundary of Fount. Service Area L-Ll; `hence in a general Uortheasterly direction i along said boundarj of County Service Area L-41, 1760 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginnin€. Containing 23,L3 acres, =ore or less. 3 00 0168 E" i 'i 1 i. 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/2018 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape- assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee failed to report accurately taxable tangible property, to the extent that this failure caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll had the property been reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the property not reported should be assessed as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and interest on taxes thereon should be added in accordance with Section 506. Litton Industries Credit Corp. 600 Summer St. Stamford, CT 06902 Class Assessed Code-Assmt# For Year Proper_t_y Valuation 01004 (01000)-8024 7C9'1Z73– erP s Prop S Hou- 01004 (01000)-8025 1975-76 Pers Prop 730 02002-8108 1972-73 Pers Prop 270 OS001-8024 1972-73 Pers Prop 200 Fred 0. & Doreen Green dba Green's Boots F Saddle 12153 San Pablo Ave. Richamid, CA 94805 08001-8116 1971-72* Pers Prop $2,520 08001-8117 1972-73 Pers Prop 1,820 08001-8118 1973-74 Pers Prop 2,180 08001-8119 1974-75 Pers Prop 3,670 *Assessee has waived statute of limitations for fiscal year 1971-72. Assassees have been notified. aA., County Assessor t12/10/75 cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 75/1013 Page I of 2 z X069 00069 T G Y Stores Company P. 0. Box 5938 Chicago, IL 60680 Class Assessed Code-Assmt# For Year Property Valuation - I973-74 Pers Prop .r40 66085-8015 1972-73 Pers Prop 170 66085-8016 1974-7S Pers Prop 3,885 79038-8003 1973-74 Pers Prop I80 AND, FURTHER, business inventory exemption allowed as indicated in accordance with Section 219 -of the Revenue and Taxation Code. T G & Y Stores Company P. 0. Box 5938 Chicago, IL 60680 Assessed valuation - Personal Property Assessed Less Bus -Code-Assmt# For Year Valuation "Inv Exempt - 79039-80 19T4=- 69U IF35 09010-8003 xemt - 09010-8003 1974-75 1,470 145 Assessee has been notified. DEC 16 1975 Adopted by the Board o , County Assessor RESOLUTION NO. 7511018 Page 2 of 2 00070 ................... 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1019 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessees` records that the assessees omitted to report the cost of personal property and/or other taxable tangible property accurately to the extent that this omission and/or error caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll were the cost of the property accurately reported or had the property been accurately reported; therefore that portion of the property which was inaccurately reported should be entered as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and, all entries made pursuant to the above cited sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code should have added to the tax thereon interest in accordance with Section S06 of the Revenue and Taxation Code: In Tax Rate Area 79038, Parcel No. 133-170-041-7, assessed to C. V. Lumber & Bldg. Mat. Inc. , 4674 Clayton Road, Concord, California, should have entered thereon the following escape assess- ments: Original Corrected Amount For the Assessed Assessed of Pursuant to Year Type of Property Value Value Change " R&T Section 1971-72 Improvements $ 4,300 $ 4,730 $ 430 531.4; S06 Personal Property 16,790 21,700 4,910 S31.4; 506 1972-73 Improvements S 4,215 $ 4 ,630 $ 415 S31.4; 506 Personal Property 16,07S 20,230 4,1SS S31.4; S06 E. F. WANAKA County Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Kettle) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 75/2019 Page I of 2 O(�t�'71 • .x i Original Corrected Amount For the Assessed Assessed of Pursuant to Year Type 'of Property Value Value Chane ' R$T Section 1973-74 Improvements $ 4,155 $ 4,560 $ 405 531.4; 506 Personal Property 17,120 22,600 5,480 531.4; 506 1974-75 Improvements $ 2,065 $ 21465 $ 400 531.4; 506 Personal Property 16,285 18,855 2,570 . 531.4; 506 1975-76 Improvements $ 2,100 $ 2,510 $ 410 531.4; 506 Personal Property 13,465 14,025 560 531.4; 506 Assessee has waived statute of limitations. DEC 16 1975 Adopted by the Board on. E. F. tiv County Assessor t12/10/75 RESOLUTION NO. 75/1019 Page 2 of 2 00012 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1020 of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having riled with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments: NOW2 THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975 - 1976 It has been ascertained from papers in the Assessorts office that property belonging on the local roll has escaped assessment; and, therefore, pursuant to the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 531, escaped assessments should be added to the unsecured roll as follows: Code 05011 - Assessment No. 9015 1975-76 Michael P. 01211ara 889 Groveland Ct. Merced, CA 95340 Boat CF 9375 FF. - Assessed Value $950 Code 09006 - Assessment No. 9001 1975-76 Dennis Cassidy 2670 Ross Place Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Boat CF 8488 EY - Assessed Value $k60 Code 53009 - Assessment No. 9019 1975-76 Henry Gibson Ernest D. Buchanan 145 Maui Dr. Pittsburg-, CA 9.1.565 Boat CP bs05 CT - Assessed Value $260 Code 73020 - Assessment No. 9001 1975-76 Michael 0. PreletZ 1146 Nogales Lafayette, CA 94549 Boat CF 8320 CT - Assessed Value $130 Code 820414 - Assessment No. 9027 1975-76 Esther Miranda 1569 Naglee St. Sen Jose, CA 95126 Boat CF 0873 BA - Assessed Value $48O Icta E. F. WanbLka . County Assessor cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector RESOIX T ION NO. 75/1020 Page 1 of 2 W 73 �vv � v 'R ,7y 1 1 Code 82044 - Assessment No. 9028 197.5-76 A. T. Robertson 21037 Keswick Canoga Park, CA 91304. Boat CF 7(17 F% - Assessed Value $900 NOTE: AsSessees have been notified of these additions and their right of appeal. ( , A&pted byth.4 board DEC 16 1975 W " E. F. Wanalm County Assessor 6 F RESOLUTION NO. 75/1020 Page 2 of 2 00074 III THE BOARD OF SUP2-RYISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1021 of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) } WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, 2-7MEFORS, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975 - 1976 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of. the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the agsessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund: Code C502t - Assessment No. 9001, boat CF 1099 ER is erron- eously assessed to Richard T. Batten, assessed value $3G0. Since this boat was moved out of state prior to the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. Code 06062 - Assessment No. 9606, boat CF 8579 FD is erron- eously assessed to Robert L. Baroni, assessed value $790. Since the situs of this boat has been determined to be Napa County where it has been assessed for 1975-76, this assessment should be correct- ed to zero value. Code 08001 - Assessment No. C627, boat CF 3968 EN is erron- eously assessed to Sydney A. Reed, assessed value x420. Since Mr. Read was not the owner of this boat on the lien date, this assess- ment should be corrected to zero value. Code 53GO9 - Assessment No. 6387, boat CF 87C5 FA is erron- eously assessed to John P. 14allonee, assessed value X1,110. Since Mr. 2lallonee was not the owner of iris boat on the lien date, this assessment should be corrected to zero value. I hereby consent to the above 1 G 1875 changes and/or corrections: Adopted bKth-_ Board on._- Jolm(g. C AUSE21, County Counsel E. F. Wan&xa Den ty County Assessor cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION ':G. 75/1,32, Page 1 of l 00075 �A 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. T5/1022 - WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered on the roll had the information been correctly furnished; therefore, assessor certifies to the auditor that the following corrections should be made on the assessment roll in accordance with Section 4831.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund. In Code 03000 - Assessment No. 2375, an audit discloses the following correction should be made in the name of Savio and Rei Kister, Inc. - on the unsecured assessment roll: Original Corrected Amount Class of Assessed Assessed of Property Value Value Chan e Personal Property 57,ZZO 56,8 Z AND, FURTHER, such error caused the assessor to erroneously allow business inventory exemption and, therefore, an escaped assessment in the amount of the portion of the exemption incorrectly allowed because of such erroneous or incorrect information submitted by the taxpayer should be entered pursuant to Section 531.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code together with interest on taxes pursuant to Section 506; and, in accordance with Section 533, the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against the proposed escaped assessment for the same tax year. f E. F. WANAKA, Ctfunty Assessor t 12/10/75 cc: Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector RESOLUTION NO. 75/1022 Page 1 of 2 00076 V ..,. � ^' ...... . ..,..... ... , _...., .. . . ..,:,-ex,,_ ,.n it t In Code 05001 - .Assessment No. 3033, an audit discloses the following change should be made on the unsecured assessment roll in the» name of Fred 0. and Doreen Green: Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value ChaneR/T "Code) Pers Prop .524 3,110 $72,110 ,U �831.5 Bus Inv Ex 11,310 10,265 + 1,045 531.5, 506 Net Change -$ 955 533 Assessee has been notified. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: �• -.%A '0S-A County Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Adopted bythe Board DEC 16 1975 By Deputyuv _RESOLUTION N(?. 75/1022 Page 2 of 2 00077 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COIIliTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll. ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1023 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the 1975-76 Fiscal Year It has been ascertained from records in the Assessor's Office and other evidence obtained through the findings of the Inter-County Match conducted by the State Board of Equalization that the following homeowner's property tax exemptions were erroneously granted on property in this county. As the assessee(s) of each of these properties resided in and obtained the homeowner's exemption on property in another county, the homeowner's exemptions should be removed from the assessment roll as escape assessments pursuant to Sections 531.1 and 531.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Further, there should be added to the tax thereon interest in accordance with Section 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The assessees have been notified. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Remove Assessee 065-242-007-6 010011, $1750 TILLISCH, Paul W. & Jewell M. 098-126-022-7 7904.9 1750 PATE, Gerald J. & Marie L. 125-090-029-5 79063 1750 POIPAO, Antonio T. POPE, Dorothy 119-074-004-8 12018 $1750MESSENGER, Opal G. 163-280-012-3 79083 750 SCHUCHHAN, Stephen M. & Penny G. 210-182-021-1 66085 1750 M.AH01M, Cornelius & Ellenjane 405-092-012-5 85029 T1750 LEDFORD, 14. L. & Wanda J. 510-044-004-8 08002 750 &4ENSOcN, Joy B. Adopted b ie Board QFC &-�7 I hereby consent to the above ._._. T-._...... changes and/or corrections: E. F. WANAKA, Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSrEN, County Counsel t/12-10-75 Cops to: Assessor (Rodgers) By Auditor Deputy Tax Collector Page 1 of I RESOL:;_'IOPt NO. 75/1023 0'078 4 < 9 I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County } RESOLUTION NO. 75/1024 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVME that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained from papers in the Assessor's Office that pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 275(c), claimants for the homeowner's property tax exemption who filed a claim subsequent to April 15, 1975, and whom the Assessor has ascertained to be eligible should be allowed $1,400 or 80% of the assessed value, as stated below. Further, in accordance with Section k985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Cade, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached should be canceled as it was impossible to complete valid procedures initiated prior to the delinquency date upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record. Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Allow Assessee 015-260-004-5 72002 $2400 MARSHMA , Gerald W. & Videlle VARGEN, Earl J. & Gladys B. 167-333--018-7 79145 $1400 N+ULADY, James R. & Joan C. 171-171-003-6 09045 $11.00 HEMEM, La jos L. & Marie J. 182-210-024-2 09013 $3.1'00 STAFFORD, George H. & Georgia J. 405-084-001-8 85029hOO DAUGHMTY, Charles & Patrocina 41.0-142-016-6 11019 111400 MICKALSON, Arthur M. & Augusta B. 412-322-005-7 11003 $3.1.00 HILA., Harold H. & Claire M. c/o ELLIOTT, Thomas C. & Annabelle 513-11;1-016-8 080ft K),,OO 4.00 MITCHEM, Joe V. & Lucille 516-201-008-5 08001 400 LOBESE, Anthony B. & Inez et al 524-120-012-9 08001 SA31CHEZ, Hartin L. & Linda L. 5 41 -162-012-6 08001 $1400 FORD, James Earl 54.9-192-004-6 08001 $1400 HEDLER, Woodrow & Eddie Adapted by the 8aard on._ 1975 , I hereby consent to the above 2 changes and/or corrections: E. F. WAiNAKA, Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSENi, County Counsel t/12-10-75 By "14V Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) Deputy Audi.to r Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLD '103 NO. 75/1021; 00�?'79 �1\ 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1025 WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1975-76 It has been ascertained from records in the Assessorts Office-that the following homeowner's exemption claims were erroneously allowed. Therefore, escape assessments should be entered on the assessment roll pursuant to Section S31.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Interest on taxes should be added pursuant to Section 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The assessees have been notified. For the 1975-76 Fiscal Year: Parcel Number Tax Rate Area Remove Assessee 085-182-003-7 07013 $1750 SIMMS, Thomas A. & Connie L. 098-142-032-6 7901,19 1750 HAINES, Walter C. Jr. & Elizabeth 179152-001-6 98026 1750 RINDS, Douglas J. & Marian 0. 234•-230-001-5 14002 11750 STUBBS, Ella B. & BROWN, Mary R. 357-198-010-5 62031 1750 PHILLIPS, Charles E. 412-352-009-2 11003 1750 WALTM. N, Thelma M. 504-101-013-2 03001 11750 FAUSSNER, Robert E. & Joy A. REIN, Judith 513161-015-5 08001 $1750 DRIVER, Ida 510f-271-004-3 08001 $1750 TILLER, Agnes 538-012-004-7 08001 $1750 Atchison Village Mutual Homes c/o GILLIS, Mary P. Chamberlain 538-012-004-7 08001 $1750 Atchison Village Mutual Homes c/o McCARTHY, Mabel V. 538-012-004-7 08001 $1750 Atchison Village Mutual Homes c/o SCROGGINS, Janes G. & Ethel 538-012-004-7 08001 $1750 Atchison `tillage Mutual Homes c/o STARLHUT, Karl & Evelyn 536•-012-004-7 08001 $1750 Atchison village Mutual Homes c/o T`dORNTON, Robert L. & Florence 558-292-002-0 08001 $1750 NICKOLA, Uldine Ross Ado ted '��e$card -••--DE - -- 5- I hereby ccnsent to the above �. ����� changes and/or corrections: E. F. WANAKA, Assessor JOHNB. CLAUSrii, Counts Counsel t/12-10-75 Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) By Auditor Deputy Tax Collector Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION N-3. 75/20?5 4 00080 IN 713E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF C(LMM11 COSTA COUffff STATE OF CALIFORNIA- RESOLUTION NO. ?5/1026 RE: Rescind Board's Resolution Nunber 75/882 Relating to ) Parcel 065-110-014 in Code Area 1006 . ) a Upon application of the County Auditor for rescission of Board's Resolution relating to transfer of tax lien to the unsecured roll, the Board of Supervisors finds as follows: 1. The Board's Resolution Number 75/882 where tax lien for 1975-76 on Parcel No. 065-110-014 was cancelled and transferred to the Unsecured roll was improper because both installments of taxes were paid before valid procedures could be completed by the Auditor's Office. 2. Since both installments have been paid, there are no outstanding taxes due for M5-76 . NOW. THEREFORE it is by the Board Ordered that the Board's Resolution Number relating to transfer of tax lien to the 1975-76 unsecured roll on Parcel No. 065-UO-014 in Code Area 1004 amounting to a 3.30 be rescinded. I hereby request the above action: I hereby consent to the above amendment J ; JOWM B. CLAUSEN, COUNTY COUNSEL 1 By Deputy C7H. DON FUN 0W Y A R-CO.YtROLLER Adopted by the Board this 16th day of December 1975 . cc: County Auditor County Tax Collector (2) County Administrator County Counsel 00081 RESOLUTION NO. 75/1026 : IN To BOA.rcD Or SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMrrY, STATE. OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Cancellation of ) Tax Liens on Property Acquired ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1027 by?ublic Agencies ) X*IEREAS, the County huditor pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4986(b) recommends cancellation of a portion of the following tax liens on properties acquired by public agencies; said acquisitions having been verified and taxes prorated accordingly. 119.11, 11HIER&FORE, BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to the above authority and recommendations, the County Auditor cancel these tax liens for year of 2arious FOR YEAR 1975-76 FOR YEAR 1975-76 (cont) SAN RAJN VALLEY UNIFIED STATE OF CALIFORNIA SCHOOL DISTINCT 110-120-045-7 2002 All 218-110-014-Is 66088 All 110-120-047-3 2002 An CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1 161-172-004-4 76051 Por 59-080-016-3 79053 Por (p 159-0$0-01?1 79041 For 367-130-%5' ,1'q 76004 All SAN PABIO REOEVELOPMENT AGENCY 373-061-002-3 5001 All 411-3521-1 11022 Por CITY OF ANTIOCH FOR YEAR 1974-75 065-110-014-1 1004 Por CONTRA COSTA COUM 071-302-007-1 1002 Por 161-172-004-4 76051 Por CITY OF CONCORD STATE OF CALLrORNIA 128-322-009-1 2002 Por 110-120-045-7 2002 All PITTSBURG REDEVEIAPIMYM AGENCY 110-120-047-3 2002 All 085-054-004-8 7025 All - 159-080-016-2 79053 Por 085-054-005-5 7025 All FOR YEAR 1973-74 H. DONALD FUNK, County Audito.,oat.oller f! a 161-172-004-4 76051 Por f Adopted by the Board o DSC 16 1975 (Tax Cancel Order) (-?:T SL986(b) ) County Auditor 1 County Tax Collector 2 (Secured) RESOLUT O;%' NO. 75/1027 ��$� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFOR.YIA RE: In the :latter of the Cancellation of ) Tax Liens On and Transfer to Unsecured ) RESOLUTION H0. 75/1028 Roll of Property Acquired by Public ) Agencies. ) (Rev. &, Tax C. S4936(b) and 2921.5) Auditor's Memo: Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 49S6(b) and 2921.S, I recommend cancellation of a portion of the following tax liens and the transfer to the unsecured roll of the remainder of taxes verified and taxes prorated accordingly. I Consent H. DOX4LD FUNK, County Auditor-Controller JOIN B. CLAUSE.R, County Counsel A = 1• By: t �'j Deputy By: Deputy The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the above authority and recommendation, the County Auditor shall cancel a portion of these tax liens and transfer the remaining taxes to the 1975 - 76 unsecured roll. Tax Date of Transfer P.euaining Kate Parcel Acquiring Allocation Amount taxes to be Area Number Agency of taxes to unsecured Cancelled 7:•:.• 3a ' 7026 085-082-006-5 PrmBuRG RED£VSLOPmf 7 i-75 to $ 70-- r $ -99$r AGENCY (all) 11-5-75 7026 085-082-010-1 PITTSBURG REDEVELOPPM 7-1-75 to 15.84 30,08- AGENCY (a13) 11-4-75 7026 085-085-010-8 PrMBURG REDVEMPPEN? 7-1-75 to e3':92 AGENCY (au) 10-3175 ,?(C. 96 -4 7026 085-086-002-4 PITTSBUM REDEVEWPIM 7-1-75 to 4550.- AGENCY (all) 10-31-75 1004 068-046-0504 CITY OF ANTIOCH 7-1-75 to 5.96 17.48 (por) 10-2-75 , 1002 074-130-016-h CITY OF ANTIOCH 7-1-75 to 1.27 3.75 (por) 10-245 1002 074-130-043-8 CITY OF JITIOCH 7-1-75 to 5.96 17.48 (par) 10-2-75 2002 126-152-028-0 CITY OF CONCORD 7-145 to �r33 �� U0,29 (an) 11-25-75 .1 �s?t qaq.6/ 2002 126-153-M5-7 CITY Or MNCORD 7-1-75 to 25%68-- a�9 64e3887$p (all) I1-17-75 - 45y ff*a,�q 9000 178-300-002-7 CITY OF WALNUT CREEK 7-?-?5 to 4307.40 1,873.96 (all) U-28-75 RESOL IrI I.C."I NO. 75/10?3 00083 Date of Transfer Rer»aining Tax Allocation recount taxes to be Rate Parcel Acquiring Area Number Agency of taxes to unsecured Cancelled 9000 178-300-0034:7 ---zc TY OF wALNuT CREEK 7-1-75 to $ 831.98 $ 1,192.52 (all) 11--28-75 5001 373-o50-001-8 CONTFU COSTA COUNTY 7--7?5 57.41 92.27 5001 373-o61-001-5 CONTRIL COSTA COUNTY 7-1-75 to 391.40 629.06 (all) U-18-75 11022 411-350-020-3 SAN Paw REDEVMPMENT 7-1-75 to 3.58 8.10 AGSNCY (Por) 10-21-75 8001 560-260-023-0 RICHMOND REDaEIMLOPMW 7-1-75 to 2,094.60 AGENCY (all) 10-31-75 L ASSEZ riz AUOrr- a: DEC 16 1975 County Auditor 1 by u.animous rote of the County Tax Collector 3 Supervisors Present • • (Secured) (Redemption) (Unsecured) ESOLUTIGN W. 75/1028 0008' BOARD OF SUPERZ'ISORS, CONTRA COS'T'A COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Abandoning a portion ) RESOLUTION 11O. 75/1029 of Warner Road ) (©zkley area). ) Date: December 162 1075 Resolution & Order Abandoning County Road (S.& If. Code §959) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On September 2, 1975, this Board passed a resolution -of intention to abandon the county highway described below and fixing October 21, 1975 in its chambers, Administration Building, 653 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon, and ordered that the resolution be published and posted as required by lair, which was done as shown by affidavits on file with this Board. The hearing was held at that time and place, this Board hearing and duly considering evidence offered concerning the abandonment. On October 21, 1975, the hearing was continued to December 16, 1975, at 10:30 a.m. This Board therefore hereby finds that the hereinafter described County Highway dedicated to public use, is unnecessary for present or prospective use, and it is HEREBY ORDERED ABANDONED. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: Recorder Planning Commission Public Works Director Director of Planning Pacific Gas & Electric Company Pacific Telephone Company E.B.-M.U.D. Thomas Brothers 'tans California Public Utilities Commission A.T. & S.F. Railway Co. IIIJI6:bw RESOLUTION NO. 75/1029 JU1llVCB5 'y Road Abandonment Warner Road {No Couhty Road Plumber) EXHIBIT A . Portion of the road known as garner Road as said road is described in the easement to Contra Costa County recorded September 23, 1919 in Book 347 of Deeds at page 146, Records of Contra Costa County, California lying in the NE 34- of Section 14 and the SE h of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian described as follows: A strip of land 50 feet in width the centerline being described as follows: Commencing on the centerline of said Warner Road- at the westerly line of said NE h of Section 14; thence from said point of commencement along said centerline easterly 800 feet and northeasterly 60 feet, more or less, to the southerly right of way line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and the true point of beginning of the said 50 feet in width strip of land; thence from said true point ,of beginning, continuing along said centerline of Warner Road, northeasterly 240 feet, more or less, and northerly 300 feet, more or less, , to the northerly right of way line of said railroad being the northerly terminus of said 50 feet -in width strip of land_ 00086 i �7 iIZ� bam'd4 c.; JUpeiv1st7rs r Ci Contra Costa County, State or California 40086 I1-1 ;nom Boo ci C-7 jupe.-i-113ors ' r Ct i Contra C651a County, State of California In the Mo:.er of Application for Funds for the Contra Costa County Study Program for Female RESOLUTION NO...75/1030 Offenders. WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa desires to undertake a certain project designated Contra Costa County Study Program for Female Offenders to be funded in part from funds made available through the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, PL 90-3S5, as amended, PL 91-644 (hereafter referred to as the Safe Streets Act) administered by the State of California, Office of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJP); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is authorized, on its behalf, to submit an Application for Grant for Law Enforcement Purposes to OCJP and is author- ized to execute on behalf of the County of Contra Costa the Grant Award Contract for law.enforcement purposes including any extensions or amendments thereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant agrees to provide all matching funds required for said project (including any extension or amend- ment thereof) under the Safe Streets Act and the rules and regulations of OCJP and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and that cash will be appropriated as required thereby; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that grant fluids received hereunder shall not be used to supplant on-going law enforcement expenditures. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on December 16, 1975. cc: Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County Attn: Mr. George Roemer, Assistant Director County Administrator County Auditor-Controller Probation Department (P3 RESOLcr ON NO. 75/1030 IVCD €i v � OFFICE OF CRIKWAL Jr,Si`IC8 'cL.F,`WING GRANT AWARD The Office of Criminal Justice Planning, hereinafter designated "OCJP", hereby maces a grant award of funds to Contra Costa County hereinafter designated the "Subgrantee' under the provisions of Title 1, part Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (PL 90-351) as amended (PL 91-644) , . hereinafter designated "Safe Streets Act", in the amount and for the purpose and duratior set forth in' this grant award. Project Title Contract No. Contra Costa County Study Program for Female Offenders Project No. Grant Period 1/1/76 - 6/30/76 ' Project Director (Name, Address, Telephone) Federal Amount John A. Davis, County Probation Officer $16,390 10th Floor, County Administration Building State Buy in Martinez, CA 94SS3 Local Hard Match $1,822 Financial Officer (Name, Address, Telephone) Other Match H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller Contra Costa County Total Project Cost Finance Building $18,212 Martinez, CA 94553 This grant award consists of this title page, the application for the grant wn=ch is att- hereto as Attachment A and made a part hereof, and the Standard Grant Award Conditions w'. a`c atw:hed hereto as At+,clvmnennt B and made a part hereof. The Subgrantee hereby signifies its acceptance of this grant award and agrees to adminic the grant project in accordance with the teriot an co tions set forth in or incorporat by reference in this grant award and thea I visions o" Safe Streets Act_ DA�.�t' j ( cial. Authori�ed t for tee Name: Warren H. Bog ss. Title: Chairman, Board of Supervisors Address: Contra Costa County Martinez, CA 94553 I hereby certify that all conditions for exemption have been complied with, and this contract is exempt frog Department of General Services approval. I hereby certify that all conditions for execption set forth in State Administrative M___ Section 1209 have been complied with and this document is exempt from review by the Department of Finance. By DATE Executive Director, OCJP SPECIAL DEPOSIT GENERAL FUND EMND LEAA e Fiscal Year tt,,(,j•008JQQ Fiscal Officer V • OCJa 652 - For use ONLY when TOTAL PROJECT COST is less than $25,000 Revised 7,/75 f`Ilicrofi1m:.d with .CAUrORNY1 CC(M L CN �, • Application ftidal JU$TCE or a (b) Of the Omnibus Crime under Section 3D1 Part g Streets Act of 1968 Control and Safe -- Part C -� Part F �► by PL-91-644. CPL-90_351), as amended pre- greement cffect�ve _ Date Tit] �_ r-,' r Grant Extension To Approved motion have been c°mP la,ed with. and this t all conditions General �,�ces aPPrOv�' I hereby certify t of ezal State Administrative M= contract is exempt from Dep tion Set forth in I hereby certify t a ditions for ex _s �uaent is exemptthafrom review by the have men cowed with and sectian DATE �--� Dep�ert of Finance. �cutive Dir ectorr �� GM4EPAL FUND SpEC1P' � DEPOSIT I a FWW , 000 5 Fiscal Year Fiscal. Officer $255,000�Cri�d with h, ;:u COST is less than OCJ.0 65• -- For use ONLY when W"L PFW 1 Revised 7/75 CAUFOMIA COUNCIL ON _ONNAL JUSTCE • Application for a grant under Section 361 Part B Part C Part F - L (b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Pre-Agreement Effective Streets Act of 1968 (PL-90-351), as amended Date by PL-91-644• Grant Extension Approved To 1 . Title: Contra Costa County Study Program for Female Offenders 2. Region- G 3. Type of Application Year: 1st x 2nd 3rd 12. Applicant: Original (Date) 12/1217S Contra Costa County Probation Department Administration Bldg., 10th Floor j� Revision (Date) Martinez, CA 94553 Phone(415) 372-2700 4. Grant Duration: 6 Months 1/1/76 13. Project Director: thru John A. Davis 5. Length if Project: 6 Months 6/30/76 County Probation Officer Administration Bldg., 10th Floor Supoort Dollars Percent Martinez, CA 94553 6. Federal 16,390 90 14. Financial Officer: N. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller 7. State Buy-In Contra Costa County Finance Building 3. Local Yard Match 1,822 10 Martinez, CA 94553 9. Otaer Match & in-Kind 15. Official Authorized to Sign Application: 10. Total Project Cost 18,212 100 Warren N. Boggess Chairman, Board of Supervisors 11 . Category: Cont cos-t �5 Program'. ig -our Vat 16' OF 7711�00r�w Ili dis-cw-" 10. Project Summary The Contra Costa County Probation Department will undertake a project of research and planning to create a corrections model suited to the special needs of women offenders. Such a model will also have special applicability to other low-density counties. 4� 09 n_,F -CAL";ORN A COUNCIL Gni CRIM94AL JUSTN" Application for a gran: under Section 3Gi Part B Part C Part �..� (b) of the Omnibus Crsme Control and Safe Pre-Agreeir:en; Effective ._..,3 Streets Act of 1968 (PL-90-351), as amended Date t6�...��i by P�--91- - Grant Extension Approved To Title: Covera Costa County Study Program for Female Of-enders Rr4ion: G Tyoe of Application Year: 1st X 2nd 3rd 12_ Applicant: ! X 1 Original 12/12/75 Contra Costa County Probation Department Admiaistration Bldg., 10th Floor F7 Rev i 5 on (Date) Rarti,Zez, CA 94533 PIS.-one (41S) 372-2700 . Grant Duration: 6 Months 1/1/76 . 13. Project Director: thsn Jorm A. Davis . Length of Project: Months 6/30/76 County Probation Officer _- Adninistratiom, Bld3. , 10th Floor Support 'Dollars , Percent MaJ-tinez, CA 94SS3 . Federal 16,390 90 14. Financial Officer: - - - • • - .• H. Donald Fust, Auditor-Contsollei . State Buy-In Contra Costa County i Finance Building _ • . Local Hard Match 1,822 10 Martinez, CA 94SS3 Quer Match 8 In-Kind IS. Official Authorized to Sign Application: , . Totai Project Cost 18,212 - 100% Warren N. Boggess Chairman, Bond of Supervisors . . Category: Contra Costa County Program Signature: Date Project Su.-,F.ary The Contra Costa County Probation Department will under*-1ke a project of research and plomi g to create c corrections model suited to the special reeds oz women offenders. Such a model will also have special applicability to other low-elrrsiry counties. OFFIG: Q= C_R2DUNAL JUSTIC ?_;:;:IING GRANT Afi7AM The Office of Criminal Justico �?ter..-ling, hereina5ter designated "Cw'�'•, hereby makes grant award of fu.-Ids to Cant= Costa County hereinafter designated the "Sc:�S=`ntee" under the p_orisions of Title 1, pa=t Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1963 (?L 90-351) as amended (PL 91-644), hereinafter designated "Safe S-ects Act", in the a Q=O=t and for the pu_rposa and duratio set forth -in* this grant award Project Title Contract No. Contra Costa County Study Prog-ram .15or Female Offenders ?roject No. • Grant Period 1/1, /,6-6Z30 Project Director (Nur, F,dd:ess, Zelepbone) iYed0ralAmounc John A. Davis, County Probation. Of=icer $16,390 10th Floor, County Administration Building _ state Buy is Martinez, CA 94553 - Local Hard Match $1,822 Financial officer (Dime, Address, Other match H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller . Contra Costa County Total Project Cost Finance Building $18,212 Martinez, CA 94553 This grant award consists of this title page, the application for the grant which is a-U hereto as Attachment A and made a part hereof, and the Standard Grant Award Conditions a:: att"G;.caad he.-eta as Attach-w-ne^_t B and made a part hereof. The. Subgrantee hereby signifies its acceptance of this grant award and agrees to admirl._ the g_-ant project in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in or incorporat by reference in this grant award and the applicable provisions of the Safe Streets Act. BY DATE Official Authorized toSigz for Subgrantee. - name: iii-=en- N. Boggess Title: Ch-a'--man,--man, Board, of Superrisors Address: Contra Costa County- ' t-iarzinez, CA 945S3 - I here-by cavi=y that all ca:di rws for exemption hava been complied w:`:, and this contract is exempt fzom_Dep?=enc of General Se-rzo_s approval. I hereby certify that all condi.--:ons for exemptian s-t north in State e--mi .is-trative Dian. Section 1203 have been cc I..c with and this roc•=e^c is exempt fznm review by the Depa_rt=en= o_ Finance. DATE Execu,' we Director Ocip SPEC21ilL DEPOSIT 6ENCYiL- ,"to _ FOND lam T.01 Fiscal Year Fiscal Officer OCJP 652 - For use ONLY when TOTAL PROS=-=T COST is less than $25.000. - OCJP 652 - For use ONLY when TOTAL PROJ-Q COS? is Less than $25 GOO- ' w,. t y �. Contra Costa County Probation Depa:Went " 10th Floor, Administration Building Martinez, CA 945S3 ENVIROMENI'AL MPACT STATE ENT NEGATIVE DECLARATION To: All Interested Government.Ageacies - -_"F: "- - - and Public Groups ' Gentlemen:- . _ -_ _ - _ _ - _ _ _. ,_ ,•_ _ .._, �..- _ �,..-r .;. s_ __ In accord with-tho procedures for the prof em ironaental . - impact statements, as environmental assessment has been performed . on the•prv_oosel _ agemcy iCt10II below. -�{,"'=.-• - Contra.Costa Comty Study Program for Female Offenders. A IIew program of research and piamxing to create a corrections model suited to the special needs of women offenders in Contra Costa County. -. The progran is staffed by two professionals wbose office will be located in Western Contra Costa County. The assessment process did not indicate a significant environ tal - impact from the proposed action. Consequently, an environmental impact statement will not be prepared. An environmental impact appraisal, which summarizes the assessment and the reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and will be available for public scrutiny upon request. Sincerely, J DAVIS ` COMY PROBATION CFFICER NOTE TO APPLICANT: Attach one copy to A-9S form (See Section 17 of A-95) A copy of A-9S and Negative Dec?aration must accompany- grant auplication. • . - _ _ _ _ lam_? �i V CERTIFICATICK OF COMPLIANCE I, John A. Davis, certify that the Cancra Costa County Prabation Department has formulated an equal employment opportun.i.t/ program in accordance with 28 CFR 42.201, et. seq. Subpart E, and that it is on file in the office of this agency, 10th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, for review or audit by officials of the Office of Criminal Justice Plaaning or the Lar Enforceam:t Assistance Administration as required by relevant laws and regulations. Date: December 12, 1975 Signed: CO&t Probation icer Contra Costa County Probation Dept. 10th Flr., AdaLn. Bldg. Martinez, CA 94533 See attached ?,ems er dated 11/5/75 (Pav 4-A) Ow V 11 - 4 - ROME - - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAIN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADNINISTRATIOM WASUMGTON.D.c. 20531 - . November. b, 1975 Contra G-.-.to Cc.6nty REGI ECD Arthur G_ Will County Administrator for Contra Costa County office as: 2nd door, Admin;atratiaa B dg- County Administr ' - Martinez, Cs13_ 94553 - - - - Attnt Mr. C.A. Ha=m=d -Bre: 75-C-026 Dear ft. mill: This is to- inform you that the ESOP for the Probation .. Department of Contra Costa County along with the- revi-- sions'of October 31, 1975, satisfy the require�ta of = - LEAA's regulations, 28 C.F.B. 42.201 et sem., Subpart E.-' : Also please be informed that IEAA feels that the consent decree provided by your office with your October 30, 1975 letter resolves the allegations of discrimination ation against - the Probation Department. Therefore, we are closing the couplaint from our active files as it relates to that - departmnt. Sincerely, Herbert C. Brice, Director Office of Civil. R3gghts Com licence BY: Ernesto V. Fuentes, Attar-eey-Advisor - Office of Cavil RigL^tz Co=pl I wee _ -w�--- - 4-A - - 014 f L ! fir rD i = N s + ��`�i •' ; Cr Cnt vL \ \\ �� .'v+ f aLCi it..-i L V• a � _. - Office of Civil Ricphts Compliance - BY: Ernesto V. Fuentes, Otto=cey-Advisor " �' Office of Civil 8% C - �� :- - - 4-A - - --- WLti tn 4-3 CA 4-3 Ln E� � o a �. U a � cm MEN % Ir- ri U ?i y T ' ry'S b L6Aa ~ in a t i d41 CL 4J IA Z N� CM li ZA 3 G r r ^ i-► to O r w i 4-4- CDN \� j N j C N N \ ` � J ^ aD 1 \ L^ CJ J-►'O R 3 r� C w to r- r N v7 1 to 3 C.! = COr 4- � • C'3 O 3 tLr �.� •�• \t�\. to CIL to to Ql tJ «: ! ed f •` co ``;,�•``•1,,+\ \\ � L Q C) i s 1 .t . 41- 1 G .1 3�N +•r C OC S • 3 �+ •o t0 .�O Cf 4.� a c v►.— C i i u+ •'- O O 06 r iL az O . t U'0 C LA i3 / Qf V • C r S i r .i•� i-• CJ O >• H O V C l N C N O C%C r- i • +.i Z 4 O +r U V GTO tt3 40 Li- Ln • r ► C U fl -ONO U l t CJ O C U •---T c T N a U I O i ••+-� a T C O S C Ct T OT C.# 3 > a r• -&to C O O 1 ++ = •- r- O m +-• `a G• N > > N Z r 4 Q.i O H'�!i C r •� %- N Z •s C d 3 j C.Q! 2 rt.` • fL." td d d Z O N Q II II.X z L Z.aC G!7 C O O N La to 4i ) � . G3 j ' r -s- 000 91) -y}+l h •4i u..}".+." .e! .,.,ti:• S{,�`?iiT{fi.4 a' .?...... ...,. .e ,.. � .,. ... ikf:: -. :1, .. .i u 4 ..y .. . e..----...-.w�.-. ..__...._ -- . f, F� F.., CALIFORMA, COUNCIL ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET FEDERAL HARD MATCH BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL FUNDS STATE LO-CAL OTHER f BUY-IN t HARD MATCH 21. Personal Services A. Salaries i l B. 82ReT1itS � r t TOTAL MVE Vuuuj -6- W DETAMEO PROJECT BUDGET (COW T) BUDGET CATEGORY FEDERAL HARD HATCH TOTAL FUNDS STATE BUY-IPI LOCAL HARD MATCH OTHER 22. Travel 'll"'ll""I' 'll""I'll'"'I'll""I'll"�17--] TOTAL NONCE 23. Consultant Services Contract with Quest House, San Francisco. 28 222 ,6 See Page 9 for Detail. ' ,390 Nage 1,822 NONE t t i . • TOTAL 18.212 I b,390NQ e � 1,822 None 24. Equipment t i TOTAL NQW . -7- y-1 DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET fCOfy'T) BUDGET CATEGORYFEDERAL, HARD MATCH TOTAL F[i�;OS STATE LOCAL D BUY-IN HARD MATCH 25. siannl i �- -r i M -- t } j r r TOTAL ME ! -7- �~1 v. DETAILED PROJECT 13WGc'T �CON'T) FEDERAL HARD MATCH BUDGET CATEGORY TOTAL ` FU3DS [STATE LOCAL OTHER i BUY-IN HARD MATCH 23. Supplies and Operating Expenses f r ' t 4 t t r Z . t t " ar i r # i i i3 i TOTAL NONE 26. TOTAL PROJECT COST 18,212 16,3390 NONE iONE 27. Percent of Total Project Cost IOO: 90% 10% i .. -8- 00098 `3 28. Budget Narrative: Begin below and add as many continuation pages numbered 8-A, S-B, etc.) as may be necessary to relate the items budgeted to project activities and cecoiete the required Justification and explana- tion of the project budget. =xplain the sources the grantee will utilize for its matching contribution: Enumerate those proposed expenditure items that require prior approval, as specified in 3ureau of the Budget Circular A-87, and in CCCJ fiscal Affairs Manual, so prior approval may be considered at the time application is made_ Detail of expenses to be covered by contract between Contra Costa County and Bay Area Quest Program Inc-, is as follows: Salaries Grant Period Total Project Researcher/P13nner $ 5,000 Secretary/Research Assistant 3,200 Payroll Taxes & Fringe Benefits 1,312 $ 9,512 Travel Auto Mileage 1,500 Other Charges, Bridge Tolls, Parking 300 1,800 Supplies 6 Operating Expenses Rent 800 Utilities 200 Telephone S00 Supplies, Postage 940 Equipment Rental & Repair 860 3,300 Professional Assistance Administrative Consultant - E. Kenney 3,000 Bookkeeping, Audit 600 3,600 TOTAL $18,212 Salaries for full month are $1,250-Project/Researcher and $800-Secretary/ Research-•Assistant- Pa--oll taxes, etc. are 5_8%-FICA, 4_21-16-U.I., 1-414-Work- mans Comp. and 4.6%-Health Iasu-ince. It should be noted that the grant period is set at six months to allow for start-up and termination time. Above costs for travel, supplies and operating expenses are full costs for a four month period starting in January and termina- ting in Jame, 1976. Travel expenses and mileage rates paid will be no greater than .`.hose established by Contra Costa County for employee reimbursement purposes. " -9- 07 099 29.,' Graphic Representation of Costs - By North PROJECT 1IG.417!'. 10 18,212 1st 2nd 3rd -.ti 5th 6th 7t� 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th + 100A 9 16,391 1 i . i i s ' 9G. t 1 Salaries for full month are S1,250-Project/Researcher and 5800-Secretary/ Research-Assistant. Payroll taxes, etc. are 5.S6 clCA, 4_26-U.I., 1-4%-Work- mans Comp. and 4.66-health Insu-ance. It should be noted that the grant period is set at sir months to allow for start-up and termination time. Above costs for travel, supplies and operating expenses are full costs for a four month period starting in January and termina- ting in Jame, 1976. Travel expenses and mileage rates paid will be no greater than .`.hose established by Contra Costa County for employee reimbursement purposes. " -9- 0 X099 " 29.,' Gra Mc Representation of Costs - By Morth PROJECT MONTH 10 18,212 1st 2nd 3rd 4t7 5th 6th 7:::- 8th `` 9th 10th eztn 12th i ! 1 100 9 16,391 1 1 . i i ' 9G: 8 14,569 t 12,743 7G: 10,927 + I f i 6 1 t � i 5 9,106 1 for 4 7,284 ► i i 3 5,463 = 2 3,642 I c�•_ I •' . 1 ► 1,821 - -- L I 30. Other Sources of Fsinding DATI j ,AGENCY REQUESTED ; REQUESTED I STATUS OF REQUEST � S ; ) s _ s � s - 00100 , v 4 PROBLEM BACKGROUND: Within the past decade, the special needs of the woman offender has been the object of study by both Contra Costa County agencies and citizen groups. In 1973, Carol Phelps and several community groups-brought suit in the U. S. Courts against Contra Costa County, charging unjust and inequitable treatment of women offenders. Mw county has made saw efforts to alleviate the unsatisfactory situation for worn. It has contracted with Sacramento and Alamo da counties for use of jail or work/study release prograos, and with the Bay Area Quest Program for the referral of selected siniais security corn. These contracts are, obviously, temporary seasures and do not offer a permanent solution to the county's problems. A work-furlough center for women has been approved but construction has not yet begun. GOAL OF PROJECT: To create a realistic plan for low-risk fems I* offender population of Contra Costa and other low population-density counties. The objectives to meet the goal are: - 1. To obtain a true picture of the-over-all needs of Contra Costa County. 2. To determine to what extent the.present Quest House and other models can satisfy these needs. 3. To design a program which is based on the data flowing from steps I and 2 above. 4. To create a climate in the county and residential communities which is favorable to the community-based multi-service plan thus developed. S. To present to the Board of Supervisors a plan which is favorable to Contra Costa County Administration and to the general public. To accomplish the above, the Contra Costa County Probation Department will subcontract with Quest House of San Francisco. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: - The Bay Aran Quest Prograu is a private non-profit corporation which operates Quest House in San Francisco as a residential altemative to incascera- tion -for waimen. Quest Hausa, since its inception on December 1, 1974, has provided varies services to Contra Costa women offenders in its residential -facility. Contra Costa County has contracted with the corporation for con- tined services on an interim basis, while seeking a solution to the problems outlined above. The present proposal for a planning grant is an attempt to assist Contra Costa County and its concerned citizens by offering to develop an objective and statistically verifiable picture of the needs of the low-risk female offen- der, along with a workable plan for meeting those needs. At the same time, Quest will be studying the feasibility of operating the Program accepted by the county. The Quest Program represents itself as having three compelling advantages in proposing such a plan. They are: 1. County ad-inistrators and the general public have both expressed confidence in the Quest aims and administration; - 13 - = 2. Quest House in San Francisco has a limited but impressive record of service to the female offenders of this county; 3. Say Area Quest Program has within its staff the expertise in - research and program development which can offer a professional and realistic program responsive to well-authenticated needs. The Planning Project would have two stages: STAGE ONE: - The first stage would include gathering accurate statistics on the famel offender and interpreting them in a meaningful way. This must include a study, not only of numbers of warn convicted acrd having served in the jail, but of women involved in each stage of the criminal justice system, -from arrest through release from custody. It must include addressing such delicate questions as the present sen- tencing patterns of judges who hesitate to expose certain offenders to the highly unsatisfactory conditions of the women's jail; as opposed to the possible frequent use of a more humane multi-service operation such as Quest House. It must also include some prognostication on the future necessity of a work. furlough program. This matter is in the jurisdiction of the sheriff's depart- ment; however, it is a significant consideration when attempting to explore the range of services at all stages of the criminal justice system, and the possible number of female offenders likely to be eligible for each. Finally, the interpretation of the data received must be so realistic that it can be readily tanslatabla into feasible and non-feasible areas of action for Quest. The statistics obviously should not and would not attempt to explore the methods of the court or the efficiency thereof,.beyond the sentencing patterns. This is not within the expertise or the interest of the present project. 013103 - - 14 e I I all STAGE TWO: At this point, Quest will attempt to develop guidelines for a program which can serve the widest possible distribution of offenders. The current Quest =louse concept, for ex=ale, is a residential socio-therapeutic program for twenty women. In attempiag to adapt its initial concept to the special needs of Contra Costa County, the guidelines may indicate that the model suited for this smaller population dea;ity would be a I:-bed residential facility, with outreach services to include many other classes of offenders. What is anticipated is that a creative model for neecinng the various needs of women offenders can be worked out, perhaps even integrating certain operations of traditionally distinct departments or agencies. A MDEL FOR OTHER COUNTIES: Quest is keeping in mind at the outset of this.project that two extra-county involvements may eventuate froa the study. One is the distinct possibility that Contra Costa County may be in a position to invite other counties to participate in initiating its women's program. Recog- nizing such a possibility is accepting the realistic fact that the program must be available to sufficient numbers to crake it a financially feasible alternative to j ail. Second, Quest anticipates that the model it develops from the study in Conga Costa County might well be one that would be applicable, with minim— alternations, to other low population-density cocr_zies. STAFF: The staff far the project would consist of one full-tine criminal justice specialist, trances Garth, Ph.D. 1z would also include a second full-time person, working in the double capacity of research assistant and clerk/secretary. Arrangs- ments for consultant services as coordinator with both public officials and private groups and individuals have been worked out with Edward Kermey, presently a Board Member of Bay Area Quest Program. Resume for Ms. Garth and Edward Kenney included (See P. 18�-74)- - 15 - 00104 W'_" , 7m LOCATION: An office for the project was been located on MacDonald Street in Richmond within easy access to the county offices and to the public. Since public sentiment sums to date to indicate that West County would be a desirable site for a future women's correctional facility, it seems desir- able that the office be within this region and visible to the public. PUBLIC INFORMATION: Since the actual operation of a community-based residential facility is assumed as one aspect of the eventual plan, Aust will maintain as a priority the involvement of,the community in its work through openness of commmication. By maintaining-an office on a major thoroughfare in Richmond, Quest intends• to be available to telephone inquiries or drop-in interviews. . The staff will actively seek media coverage of its work, as well as the general and specific backgrounds of the problem. Television, radio and newspaper involvement can help to educate and prepare the public by articles such as.one tracing the attitudes of citizens living near such facilities in other areas, or by interviewing successful graduates of like programs. COMMUNITY INVOLVE[ENT: The Quest Planning Project Brill continue to involve itself with already approached community groups and will actively seek out imiolvement with o6hers. These include, but are not reser icted to, the folloAng: Equal Rights Advocates of San Francisco League of Women Voters J.A.I.L. (Joint Action and Involvement League) Business and Professional Women's groups Diocese of Oakland Churches and Synagogues - 16 - 105 4 i i Contra Costa Mental Health Commission: Alternatives to Incarceration Committee Coalition for Alternatives for Incarcerated Women Kiwanis Clubs Junior Chamber of Commerce groups SITE DEVELOPMENT: - As the projected plan begins to take shape, Quest intends to be actively developing a list of possible sites. Its current intentions are to screen existing buildings in the Richmond or West County area, which could be adapted to the special needs of such a proggram. Among these special needs are included, listed here without, regard to priority: 1. non-institutional appearance; 2. public transportation to services, jobs, and schools in the community; 3. adequate space for offices, counselling rooms, decent and non-, crowded bedrooms and comfortable living accommodations; 4., capability for reasonable supervision; S. neighborhood acceptance. Among types of buildings presently under consideration are former comrsstts, unused rest or recovery homes and larger private residences. TIME LIVE: Task b4onth Month Ponth Month Month Mont' 1 2 3 4 S 6 Rent Office Hire Stay Rent Furnishings F, Equipment Gather Data Compile and Interpret Data �� Construct Plan Present Plan to County Explore Program Site r E`3DA _ . ¢Garth ate`ces C,o eeOt , es"Mes ` _ « .. ,' �.I• .+. -w syr s• rr l� t �Yt ~ '� '� _ .. _ s ?' •-•_ • w .. .� • "+" '�•'�� its a �f r rte...+� 'cam.' i n . _ ., _ r n - n ,. •r' �� .R. •: ._""*.'!s/�.1.�r+,r`Yr ♦.'Ty' ♦l:•'�r�i 's.,-.. � f+a~.. ,'. «A,2 �. I �+.. .,,� ••f .L� . •s. l!qr sfR /. '' •t i.-i.�• r • .r - + _ .M ,s-. r"� .. , ���� t s fi'.f ,,,,tT..,ys ✓'P�,'•.�: ` _~ �L Bs i'I �T;'.,r s _ f ,r L • =i• _ -.» .�'a h ... r } .. ..; .f..` .,• :�FyMt z,Js ♦. s_.r' ,jr� ..,.!,e"R - .. {• ♦ tom.+; � �♦.:, - n. , r e,. s - ti r, jar ..•' „ fir r n n _ n " • • , • .. � •. • .r �•'ii �•• .ref v _ 4� � CONS ULTAf L. W. Kenney = : _ 240 Buckingaas Ray ,San Francisco, Ca. 9413:Tel: (.413) 3w1•-•6581 _ ED UUTIOY --. _ -�._ •- Graduate of Holy Cross College, Worceatar, ma, -Wives majora is Education, � - -- and BuAiaess Administration.: Graduate School: Boston Lol2ogo L: School - ",:� and Northeaatrrn Univeraity School of Engineering. _.;....�'�k.-..,�:i..�=;--?;�r�tit'�.�.:. ?':.:'r`'' _--G..u:•t�lCPe�RI®fCR��:�._ -^6:aw�+r ' :..:'- -'�s,.r'�..''-�:� �:"..: - Sin (8). years Zonsultast an ,social ser►iesa type progzaas/pre'acts, . is- > volving, ckildru a adult retarded, elderly, alceholiesr ez-ofieaiers�- ;+ - hftndiai►prsdI and simerity.youth probl~. Clients: U..-S. Depsrtimeat of Labor.; IIr .S.,-,DepartnoaV1 of Asaltkv Edneatiea aid tielftrof Stile-di Cali - - fornia;-Cegttias of Sas Fiaieaiaee, Yasin, Ssnts Clara, and Sams Crus;:_ _ _ Berkeley Unifled School District; mad a number of non-profit organizations ` J .engaged, in various soaial service prograss. Expertisss presses."stout in' proposals, bndgats�"retract administration, accountabilityp ovaluistiomr -r•, planning and detelopMst: Thirty (30)• fears eiperienco' in business, indust 7-sii.elsptiom_ vi employee rwlations, rehabilitation and job training,. audita and •esepsta?• , finance, marketing, comimunity and governmental relations-, labor law and contracts, and management con3uJltant. Taught and coached athletics at the � .. - '-1�~;.-- ..r �•��_�-.� ..._�- 'ate _-.._t .-�%�_�.._ = • � - -. high schoi&ani un=zersit e•c nave 'sorsed emtenaivel-r -Pith minori.ins vhuo hava been iwol-red -in,probless _. with the lav, -assisting them'to re-Adjust La sociat.-' ; off*ring Voestional -couneel;n3 and guidance; setting-up rehabilit&tion and job- training pro- _ " grsss; gettimg jobs; bringing fasilies black together; and educating the _ public and the bnainesa community For bertwor accept moria of peoale with problems.who are working hand-; to overcome them. Serve as a maber of the Board of Directors -tor ae.eral organisations; os - the Labor Pagel-of the American Arbitration As3ociatio1; and on the National -- . Community Disputes Settleaen -- ly st 7.x Frances Colleen - S3Cerci1:o, California 9,45s7 HIM= ?::43r: (415) 525 3773 _ -�.rr-�.0 a•�:i -�l:C_iS: (-"r15) 3 -+r7-31T - - :•. • : - ..�. 4:►- is• _- _ - + - _ '.r •1�'7•s•i� • _ - ._N.�'s'-..�1 £3L'C�tirT_C.� B.-" - L^i-ino?ogy. U.C. 3erkeley ' California ?Masters Cri=ainolo_ g, u:C: 3erkeley, ^Cal�FornZa w" Ph,.,7. Candidate II:C_~. Sar eley " California•- Candidate., a - = 197 Teaching assistant under_?r. 3ermar�3- - • - - :• Di=ond,. School of L_:iminoloJy,, U.C. 197C: Lecture, 2n area o•' woaen in t[2e~correcti0aal, r and criminal juscice =v•=t::,z. , Cess -ia Oakland . •- ; . ' ' _ _ _ - •- Lair in StInnic Eo= nizias. : • . ^ � 1' 75: Lecture, U. :. 3erkcley oa a fort= on - . _ prisons. Topic role o? ::or.•enIm•the correctional system alternatives to incarseratioa." 197'-7 is :esearc'r• %szistazxt- Evaluation of .co-=unity- based cor recti•anal �:o• r. Research to determi..ne•=. • the effectiveness o: ca •szity �oco�aws as ani. - -- alternative to incars�ratio�. _ 197'.: Head '_:esearc. st., 'aad second. evaluator_ Su7er v isio_^• of five research•assistan:,s..__ Tralned • the,, research and e:=? •-tion techzicuss. r-.-aivation. - OL i a•Y$ CO iLnitV X33:-4 i uvenile-divec3ion pr og?'.'2.' . " Ufa;ors Lri^_inal Justice Louacil, S .'1 :`razciscoa - - California. 20 i ice. .�� :ZCC��• C. _ 7 • - - + •- _ r -� _ . the effectiveness o: cow-s,-ti�p. '�rojgra= .�'. alternative to as am : _- 3research :��., a:�dsocQ, :r evaluator -' Su2e-•visioc of . .. - ' r.�;,,..•_ five researciz assistaz=r� Trained %' thy, research and -eva=ua,ioa t�h-1i•?uss ' of five co==* =ltv - . . :'dI L1t7tZat=•' a3.sed juveaile e-?P-Ye:s Criminal jus, ice ds'vers,.on _ CaliForaia. �ouaciLx S:a rr�o, :. • " ria .4- s •~w .. ♦t r '•A•a. t •• ` •. '• • _ '• * •.,•�i• •t•'S i.+.J'-w'r _ -IM_•t.-".yt• .•r r-• .rr .. • * •_moi' Std'•" .���x,�=.�'y« "'t,' •..a, ': _r:v'�S�r s:ty`.• ss'iS wa¢i� Y1 •!1r���tw�.• + .. •., •r •�«. « C ,A•,NLt .. y�.r i.. •'~ �a Ar .+ ra,�-, +'-'�� r r�•: .•i w ro ' ,.+"'1 . +T Jw�v.ii �St r.w+ fes* _:��' . �~.ow::.• �'ii'�. .iv.�M.�.itt•�i�i •.��L 1��j7yi� ` • - - l � t.a,�a w..r. •.4i.•.~-� �..Z' : i.:. •-:.Z.. •~.:a'.:'-• w��yLX,: IL�Li is , + 1.OrCiw:t�!•.!• '-%�i:i::`...•�iS-� .. ..t' i:�,i-t=� a' 1t:Mi�.L• • , w - bra • r .�",rwr: #moi ��,M�f� -��`M7.�*Z i•`-r,�• �.w�:.R..�n!ia�• Lwni+S'riiNM; •'i � ... • .. va+ii'L"`ll'`• +:1t---Vil:*'•3.'•, ir.—!�• ! taxi=-s'.-ior AC.Lto. w•"►'F •°• - w-,,. .. _t• . , collaty c trts to i•1Zc3 ..in •Drat ^r0,_rra=z,�- or 'o:: �hc•�e;�r� :� ..::::�r�► �ro�*rrrs�,=is aieit- -<-_�_.� •= -�_.: :, `� - •�;a • bei-&T ,ae::rserat� 'ier.c-iu_.r -3 or- f • . . ' =?�'L ,.ta:T '` prisons `4:'T�.O iC3 ?1•a'i T•.t�1t.1;2a:' GOs:'t':,eF.SSM!"S.• .r''E.'" :"` . " ' •' _.« 3l 1�]. '/s"t�. �w. l`i ww�r "ter -�:21e"��e�.�►tt�.�R=i'hda�'''•�:''.-' ".•r•« C."vicar.. Niadla� T1s 9T: Ce�3!`;,`- r-t�.••�- *' -..r:, had M own case load. ':.:.a•tha 1•z�� :re2reseatttirar~� - . . 'for r.e12set's frau •clienta a,._court �2eeres� �- . :• •�_ :. _ u -r;•,."�. G`-.�.�)�'Ts� intervi r m tial xe°e 2f cases..Iidl�qai, R. �' , �,r;ce?��il� ,.e:� v:lw .�".?wa�:� • G'�*Y�r-.�'w�r.��.+'r.i�t•�''���`�`i.Y r 'r •r•i ' R1.tt:t2::' 3i1v te: i•:_:� c'A'. Z� Lor• .. ! • : dL+}�. - + •y,' .t 9. w ► : ':oanssl+�: �4�:iti:.�:. fc.14a15. •"t ' •M•R•'' •% -:'' :'uylic F<:?v'=01:8,wits: troubl'id - w , ' YOVS 'i.!, 64D11.VeOl �.� � e:JUC tLaa 2„r Mw=br 0Ych� •i•�'••' --�- - ' ••r. Wn .93 7. 1972+ 'tet-�.st a^-z: '3irca:ter of Zan. cepcatnbsal= t- .. ;eac' Pro Z,r.-ax se:-ed in the Oakland.5 pools -er. T dt•d cottel:z�-, with:. ts1o:L''t::•=.; sl�lw�'C:• 3+]:= c�•c-2s�I$�a+f�--•�'h 2�,ac rr:t' he"2.7-- c•.�i=v.�"t'�2..1� C*�ls L i.�''L .+�Z i•7wM e�w1 r'•..'Zw�i...as s`Z•.a�i r-acre. . ter. z - • 1971: 1 r;.�„ ; ^�.- �::..z:n-:•Lst •i-*7�tth L�rw- nforCt+s~ • w • •• • w w.•1YC .Ni`-C,i'ir s�ri��rZY.-• �i•./a ww--ZM =a~YYiMaM • Of�i•cc o:� ::1eo re;- 0=1 plu wlia- -board. .:•L*anccd~-:::•~_-j'=- } ' about tl:e .u:-ain i sF ra M i.0n, -;re3e .�ch,'• ro�.zt , AIA ' •. ' ••- `jam=.�.jp wi •'•'ti. • •nvr ! �::� :':!'o i�"♦ti:� � t�.?:a•'• •':WACC 1:1 •4.:«','.r:2^rk h�•�7'�52.'i»5�. �. :.:w:r:L��� :-Lcs:�� :SO:1`.!3�s :? eiariCt3 :•:::"!�.x�`. T_ .*A .!.c .'R.'f•,'•m -int 3l L'�g�d"!•-f'3'.`i :.•: '�L�ir whir *30•iZ:27.'•? rnt-aict% it .^.'L+': :: :3cr honor no-Lai;; � L-'� :.':,. �Mr*x ..!)r. 3-`*rn:+:_ -ou:/ .7:*a.L -:, z•3�. pay:--. School. of C- ' ' • ' •;. •+ w.•1r •t � .«S! Jw S- s•#� `�•M-v.,r ��. s-+j+,�' '•_:. 'sr,�J•'•.+'fr • - - " - s. "'w SAwi:`4�i ~ �M.n�ar .. .yw�k; www.'�i•4• �.. V-" mow`. . .t':�Jf i.! S., 1 ',ti Ye -P`t0��l��a�'�''yMR!=wRi-~.T������Q+� wt"-�...:�"1• �•',J.•�,.�J,,, •�• -•��'•/i�.w Y U• '`r r i+R +• '+� s ti -� ��w► �. •..,Rf. :• I •}ri'"•:.��• f.+. ' !• - 61 • .ala Mme... d -..'�."•t ✓'•r+. �- r` .' M',.r•siTy•' • ..; ,i ;:-, •� - - � -may;. -�•.=•;',�+-' .:t:-:-::-. . .:r,•.• -f'••,_ it-'i• `�',w • ' .School•as Craainolo, r► •z ` + �-•e •_.'•`• a •J-tnr ,'' �: ,++ s#...- • ti :�•, '• �me R.+•: ••�.. • '�••«IF •y,.,b,r ...�. •/. ate• * •�, •r • ' .- C. :fir=•+w •.. !. f w w�.' Y•a '•►. 'S. • ti A�'ji•I _ ,r"! ; oi-:iaa •}" '.,•.. I 1A' «�;Vii' �'...+"�� "�p•„ ji. •q« •sy 'irx.. • r. 'fir. :.6 :�'::_t �:U dn"r w�► 1 a r'::. � _ = ;. .+w.: • .. . . • • 3�'.liC:.M:.V :Rrs iri-iY 4►rsv.�V_ •. .• w.•-- •+�!J '". •-f s - �. .`... �: - . .. . � t. C. err-. •w..� _ - •s .�'•-: Yir•i►. :SYr•:•' t �,�.. +'.•„�•` i•w'� +a' r. ,mss.,.....w ,: sR'. w. � � + ON 0 4` _ _• _ ,ms's• - w•y+i= s �� :a ���';�' ♦ .• • • r ` « •rI i �;`�'!-w,•i �`. . -- : • •.. •�. w „•••rte. . s#: •'�'• fes' s - • •tom • r r ' 4 ,F r!•'.''1 .j4i�, +' ." ♦ .",••Y•w f�I ' _ :i; M• .. - l -'Sw+`r ABY J d'••fw. i - T - -' . . y -i•rr•v+ + ._ t _�• +i •+�'wlG_ai�•.• -.7 �' � � _'"• •f s;,,•• • �.w.�J� .,Y+: :•. •:: sem-l- !.G w l- s• w R 11r'• .♦ r;•;"ej mow• c., Z ECISIUTY Orr COPY OIV T1415 DOCUMENT UNSA TIj-gA C TOR y A T T11AjF Or . IVICR OFIL MING a a A X w u , r Ist r,the ...."`"•;yes.: to r w,^t=•"rv... 'wi.E►.'�""i"'•'"� � ♦ ♦ � r ""r"moi y� ��Sr' .. n.. • ' -. - _ = • - - - .( /., � i. n'- 'i•'^ it:.+ , _ r _ wn• - - s , wn w� -n , e, J ••.f' w, , r - .. w. - _ a .i♦ fi ^• ,w { 'i a". nM^t _ E �>i w•C•a,�Y� _.:.�.r2itt. �.Stivf C1CP. :..?-^.3,,,'L'L'• - • •' . , :,;r.:,ta �L•tl;':•�;, Ce`••.-•e.r i c.rUed JCC•sr J iee.s r.-fit office, int a. xie•is so :vlzc=e-It, ?*-1: s+f Ublic contact. .Ki..`.Z7t. • 010Z�iv o Ilh6••?rezident _ •s ,:est �.it .�. ..,cr.:ele7� . ..._c; _ • �.: r FI =ca rel, rt pub"in -CoffbaCv,v ' ` •i. 't sv 2'!2_-:Gled oresideat t s personal iatcr:-stion with -all- :tine cazkn :zes her:Place=wrb U;C. - :'- - •- �CrsCler. isl:_c^_' ., inzzaac:tin rossitiow3 4- all over the=-U.S. rn4:2eriodicali y- fcrei _ placement. 3nle. 71a!-ed canyidatea, scree ted ,^ app lica*tbs= 'selected 'lest candidates for •. •interiiews :-rich placement people: - -: aat�rrctiana - -d is ::a-Wents and Deans of r . _ �= V moi.^rr-ities f rom ali-o7er the cou-try. -., z reao:-�-", e--t-enni:'C !lu:3IiC-'comtaCtp', - • • zU:-. Rad tis be ::s=A to :•!ors un-_er pressure. 1 . 3j•-1�!�: ?lZl�i T' 3.V[3 :•'.8t..' I Oso •, =al is 2oze_. "14-Vision.of-'.,Nuys. - ?actio. r cc,, :enortci_nterviC' s =_ :. o� ra;i..-tse- -,."'.7:.�,� nor our traia:..-�` _ = - • :• .*�.�.«j-�� �i••':.=s ^fit .e .-.. C'� - - Jam• - `v- . 7� - •. ... -• •� �.-� - .•• .. ... - cam: IM THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATS OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposal ) to Change the Name of ) Coggins Lane and Officially ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1031 Name the Portion of Road ) Known as Oak Road Extension, ) Pleasant Hill Area. ) ) WHEREAS this Board having on November 24, 1975 declared its intention to change the name of a certain county road and officially name a new portion of roadway in Supervisorial District IV; and having fixed December 16, 1975 at 11 :15 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing on said L resolution of intention; and notice of said hearing having been posted in the manner and for the time required by law, as evi- denced by Affidavit of Posting of November 3, 1975 on file herein; and WHEREAS this being the time fixed for said hearing and said Board having Hilly considered said matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the name of the `i existing portion of Coggins Lane extending easterly from Buskirk Avenue to its present point of termination be changed to GOGGINS �! DRIVE; and R� IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that a new portion of roadway v between Las Juntas Way and the existing Coggins Lane, presently (� known as Oak Road Extension, be officially named GOGGINS DRIVE. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. cc: Recorder Public Works Director Planning Commission Draftsman Jury Commissioner Postmaster, Pleasant Hill Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Mount Diablo School District E.B.M.U.D., Oakland Attn: H. J. Wickman, Land Agent E.B.M.U.D., Walnut Creek Western Title Guaranty Company, Martinez P.G.& E. Company, Concord California Highway Patrol Pacific Telephone Company, Oakland Pacific Telephone Company, Martinez California State Automobile Association State Dept. of Trans. District IV Thomas Brothers Maps RESOLUTION NO. 75/1031 00114 V it I X JL - ----------------- - �i3 ins Board of Sup%rylso=s i Oi Contra Coda County, Sate or Califo:nia In the tAo?!sr of Amending Resolution No. 75/523 RESOLUTION NO. 75/1032 Establishing Rates to be Paid to Child Care Institutions WHEREAS this Board on June 30, 1975 adopted Resolution No. 7S/523 establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for the Fiscal Year 1975-76; and WHEREAS the Board has been advised that adjustments in rates for certain of the institutions are necessary; and WHEREAS the Board has also been advised that certain institutions should be added to the approved list; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution No. 75/523 is hereby amended as detailed below: ADD THE FOLIAWIA GROUP HOME MONTHLY RATE Oakhaven Academy Group Home/Sacramento $843.00 Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. cc: Probation Officer Human Resources Director Social Service County Administrator - County Auditor-Controller Superintendent of Schools RESOLUTION NO. 75/1032 bs 00115 I BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CO_- A COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the matter of ) adoption of the Seisr±ic ) Safety Element of the ) RESOLt'TION' NO. 75/1033 County General Plan ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Its Clerk on October 29, 1975 received a copy of' Resolution No. 75-1975 adopted by the Planning Commission recommending the draft Seismic Safety Element attached thereto (consisting of' the Public Hearing Draft of the element identified as Exhibit A and the modifications included in the staff response document identified as Exhibit B and dated October 21, 1975) be adopted as a part of the Contra Costa County General Plan, said element being a mandated element in compliance with Section 65302(f) of the. Government Code. On December 9, _ 1975, pursuant to the Planning Commission's Resolution. No. 75-1975, this Board held a hearing on t'he said draft Seismic Safety Element, Notice of said hearing was duly given in the manner required by lair. The Board at the hearing heard the testimony of all persons interested in the matter. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Board continued the nearing to December 16, 1975 to allow staff and the Associated Building Industry's representatives an opportunity to satisfactorily resolve their differences concerning the manner in which new implementation measures would be initiated in connection with the proposed Element. At the Board's meeting on December 16, 1975, the Planning staff presented it with a memorandum dated December 15, 1975 and addressed to the Chairman of the Board, Supervisor Warren A. Boggess, (a copy of which iz on file with the Clerk of this Board) containing the consensus of understanding reached between the staff and the Associ- ated Building Industry to resolve their differences as to the implement- ation of the proposed Seismic Safety Element. It was stated by the Planning staff to the Board that the consensus of the agreement was ' that the said December 15th memorandum and the prior statement of the Associated Building industry as set forth on Appendix "A" attached hereto should be referred to as a statement of the Board's intent in connection with the imnlementation of the Element. This Board hereby certifies that the Environmental Impact Report (with all supplements and attachments thereto) submitted to it by the Planning Commission concerning the draft Seismic Safety Element has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and that it has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Ervironr:ertal Impact Report. This Board hereby adopts the Seismic Safety Element, as trans- mitted by the Planning Cormission, as part of the County General 'lan. The Board hereby declares both the statement of the Associated Building Industry as detailed on Appendix "A" attac*ied hereto and the comments made in the aforencted I'ecember 15, 1975 memorandum of the Punning staff to be expressions of the Board's intent In connection with the imnlemenLation of the Element. -1- 75/1-3332 1 00116 1,4 t,, } fa Iii A copy of the Seismic Safety Element, including all maps and texts, is on .file in the office of the Clerk of the Board; and shall be endorsed approved by the Clerk as provided thereon. Further, the Director determination concerning this f Planning shall iadoptionle with tand he County theEFR. a notice of _ _ PASSED on December 16, 1975 unanimously by the Supervisors present. cc: Associated Building Industry Director of Planning Public Uorks Director Acting County 3u'-1du' Inspector County Counsel County .Administrator -2- YJ:q:bw SOLU'ION U01. 75/1033 00117 APPENDIX "A" The Seismic Safety Element is a public information'document Intended to be used as a guideline. - While the Element deals extensively with implementation recommendations, it is expressly understood that before any implementation proposal is effected, a thorough study and review shall be made by the staff as to the necessity for the proposal, giving particular attention to then existing or proposed Federal, State, and Building Code regulations and requirements. The purpose of such review is to avoid duplications of regulation, to fully evaluate the necessity for the proposal, and to preclude placing an unnecessary or excessive burden on either the public or private sectors or the consumer. The results of such review shall be reported in writing and made available and distributed to all affected parties. Each such report shall include commentary on the cost impact of the proposal to the County and private sector. If the report ,includes a recommendation for implementation of the proposal, the- matter shall be the subject of a public hearing prior to its promulgation. 0 118 t. x.. .f,. PIP— R t IVSD r�ECE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT E � 1975 aim WXao COST Pig ` 1 09 22 TO: Supervisor Warren A. Boggess DATE: December 15, 1975 Chairman, Board of Supervisors FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: Consensus with Associated Director of Planning Building Industry on Seismic By: Charles A. Zahn 44z- Safety Element questions In response to Board of Supervisors instructions given on December 9, 1975, Planning staff (Dr. Myers and I) met last Friday with Mr. Dean LaField of the Associated Build- ing Industry to resolve differences in the interpretation of certain implementation recommendations in the Seismic Safety Element. We were able to reach a consensus, the results of which are reported on below. Planning staff requests that your Board accept this report and acknowledge it as an expression of your intent in the resolution adopting the Seismic Safety Element. The basis for our consensus is that the Planning Department, on its part, has no in- tention to unilaterally undertake new seismic safety programs--however desirable or beneficial--or to duplicate the work of other agencies; and, the Associated Building Industry, on its part, has no intention to interfere with the management of existing authorized programs or with the assignment of authorized staff. Further, neither the Planning Department nor the Associated Building Industry wish to delay the adoption of the Seismic Safety Element, and both would prefer to apply their energies from this time in considering the particulars of subsequent implementation proposals. Relative to this consensus, it is reasonable for the Associated Building Industry (or other organization or the public in general) to expect that information on costs, benefits, and relationships to other programs will accompany proposals for new County seismic safety programs, and that they will be given the opportunity before they are implemented to comment on those programs that are likely to impact their industry and the public. Good examples in the seismic safety field would be a building-by-building survey to identify hazardous structural conditions, an abatement program to correct these conditions, or the adoption of a new policy or ordinance conveying new powers or requirements. Typically, proposals of this kind come under the scrutiny of the Board of Supervisors and the public during the budget-setting process (when new positions are identified and new projects are authorized and funded) and during the ordinance (or policy) adoption process. It would be feasible for staff to report on costs, i benefits, and relationships at these times. It is also reasonable for public agencies to exercise managerial discretion when carrying out assignments and performing activities when these are consistent with applicable law, approved budgets, authorized staffing, and adopted ordinances and i 1 i Mcrof icmmd with boc.-6 order F 90119 i _2- December 15, 1975 Supervisor Boggess field that are matters of olicies. Appropriate include the assembly of information and its aresent ro riate activities in the seismic safety is evaluating p managerial discretion wosisv uld developing a�jn�strative too , , making surveys and studies, ure auopt�on of a . ""'"' a" au'dLement program to correct rrry requirements. Typically, new policy Of Supervisors and the publ c Burin of y or ordinance conve in this kind come under the scrutiny g of Powers or are identified and new g the budget-settin a the Board (orare Iden P Projects are authorized and funded) and (when new positions benefits,policy) tion process. It would be feasible for staffdtdurjng the ordinance relationships at these times. o report on costs, It is also reasonable for Public agencies to exercise managerial discretion when carrying out assignments applicable law, approved budgets, authorized activities when these are consistent with frog, and adopted ordinances and r-! Micro�r.nsed with boa:o order 3 00119 . Supervisor Boggess -2- December 15, 2975 policies. Appropriate activities in the seismic safety field that are matters of Managerial discretion would include the assembly of information and its analysis, making surveys and studies, developing administrative tools, evaluating present and future program needs, and exploring the prospects for aids, grants, and services. In the context of this consensus, the Planning Department has no objection to the Associated Home Building Industry's request that the Board of Supervisors include the ABI's qualification statement in the original language in the Boards' adopting resolution. In the matter of the recommendation in the Seismic Safety Element that the- County consider the establishment of a Seismic Safety Referral Panel, a-consensus was reached that the specific statement in the report that such a panel might have a • ' role in the administration of the- building code should be deleted (but it is under- stood that the County Administrator is free to study all aspects of this proposed body) and that the whole matter of this panel should be referred to the County Ad- ministrator for study and report. It is understood that the County Administrator would utilize the services of the County Planning Department and other County agen- cies, and consult with interested individuals outside of County government in the course of conducting the study. However, a six-month study period (instead of the two-year period originally proposed in the Seismic Safety Element draft) is accepted as a reasonable period for staff to prepare and submit a report to the Board of Super- visors and a period that ought to be compatible with the wishes of the Panel 's pro- ponents for "imminent consideration". Additionally, it is agreed that the statement on page 59 of the report referring to "high priority and adequate staffing" commented on by the Associated Building In- dustry should be deleted because it is superfluous and subject to misinterpretation. CAZ/bp cc: Associated Building Industry Attn: Dean LaField Supervisor Kenny Supervisor Moriarty Supervisor Linscheid Supervisor Dias Advisory Review Panel Attn: Charles Taylor r J 00120 a Seismic Safety Element PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT �� by CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENTs Contra Costa County, California MiCrOfilmed with 130ard Order 00121 i `SEISMIC SAFEW ELEMENT Part of the General Plan Of Contra Costa County, California s Prepared By The Contra Costa County Planning Department August, 1975 .a. 00122 MENEM TEXT Page INTRODUCTION Seismic Safety Goals I General Objectives 2 Earthquake Overview 3 Earthquake Measurement 8 LOCAL SEISMICITY General County Geology 111 Local Earthquake Faults 16 Earthquakes, Past and Future 21 Ground Shaking and Ground Failure 28 Flooding 34 HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES AND PHYSICAL FACILITIES Seismic Risk 43 Structural Damage in Earthquakes 44 Structural Safety Program Components 46 Reconstruction and Redevelopment Plaaning 48 Community Facilities and Seismic Safety SO Critical Industrial Facilities S3 IMPLEMENTATION General Plan Relationships SS Project Reviews S9` Ordinance Administration 61 Other Planning Implementation 62 Post Disaster General Plan Review 63 Emergency Operating Agencies 64 Scientific Programs 67 Mapping Programs 71 Aid, Grant, and Insurance Programs 73 APPENDICES A. Technical Background Report's Findings, Policies, A-1 and Recommendations B. Earthquake Measurement and Correlation 8-1 MAPS, FIGURES, AND TABLES MAPS 1. Generalized Geology Map 13 i • 0012.3 00001 2, Major Fault Systems Lage 4, Seismic Ground Response 29 i 9uefactinn pmt 1ti ) 7q 73 Mapping programs raxtca Program Aid, Grant, and Insu APPENDICES Policies, A-1 and Report's Findings, A, Technical Background and Recommendations and Correlation B. Earthquake Measuremen MAPS, FIGURES, AND TABLES MAPS 13 1, Generalized Geology Map 00123 s Page 2. Major Fault Systems 19 3. Seismic Ground Response 29 4. Liquefaction Potential 31 FIGURES 1. Plate Tectonics S 2. Geologic Section Through Contra Costa County 12 3. Earthquake Locations, 1934-1971 23 4. Approximate Boundary of Delta and Classification of Delta Levees 35 S. State Controlled Dams 37 6. Tsunami Recurrence and Tsunami Attenuation 40 TABLES 1. Descriptive Titles for Earthquakes 9 2. Generalized Stratigraphic Sections and Engineering Characteristics 14 S. Summary of Available Data on the Activity Status of Major Faults in Contra Costa County 20 4. Approximate Probability of Occurrence of Earthquakes on Selected Bay Area Faults 26 S. Design Earthquakes for Known Active Faults Affecting Contra Costa County 27 6. Estimated Seismic Susceptibility Factors \ for Geologic Units, Contra Costa County 30 7. Estimated Liquefaction Potential Factors for Unconsolidated Sediments, Contra Costa County 32 8. Selected Characteristics of Dams in Contra Costa County Under the Control of the State of California 38 9. A Scale of Acceptable Risks 45 10. Crustal Movement Programs and Instrumentation, Contra Costa County 72 11. Post Disaster Programs Which May be Available Following a Severe Earthquake ii 00124 a ra PURPOSE • This Seismic Safety Element is a part of the Contra Costa County General Plan. The Seismic Safety Element is a public policy for relating the County's programs for land use planning, the provision of public improvements, and the development (or redevelopment) of land to the County's seismic characteristics. Although attention has been given historically to the performance of buildings and structures during earthquakes, compara- tively little attention has been given to the subjects of how land uses should be distributed, or building developments laid-out, on a seismically active landscape. This is the realm of the Seismic Safety Element, and it promises to be a field for innovation for years to come. The Seismic Safety Element is particularly important to Contra Costa County because the County is located in one of the most seismically active areas of California. It is subject to severe ground shaking, ground failure, and flooding from earthquakes occurring both within the County and the Bay Area, and it is additionally subject to ground rupture from earthquakes on a number of faults located within the County. Further, the potential for earthquake damage is increasing as the County grows in population and as development extends into higher risk areas such as certain of the hill areas and natural flood- plain areas. This is Contra Costa County's first Seismic Safety Element. Because it is largely based on available information, it is expected to be supplemented and made more comprehensive as its implementation program is carried out and as more detailed information is produced. SEISMIC SAFETY GOALS The Seismic Safety Element was prepared to further several long- range and on-going goals of Contra Costa County; these are: 1. To prevent the loss of human life from seismic causes. 2. To minimize serious injuries to human beings from seismic causes. 3. To facilitate the provision of essential services following a disaster from seismic causes. 4. To reduce damage to property from seismic causes consistent with (balanced against) financial capability, quality of life, and environmental quality. S. To facilitate recovery from a disaster from seismic causes. 1 _ 0012-3 The objectives, policies, and recommmendations of this plan are intended to address these goals. GENERAL OBJECTIVES The Seismic Safety Element is intended to serve the following purposes: 1. To comply with Section 65302 of the California Government Code requiring cities and counties to include Seismic Safety Elements in their General Plans. 2. To provide a basis for better considering earthquake hazards and other hazards in public and private decision making. 3. To incorporate earthquake hazards, and other hazards, into the considerations of the General Plan and its several component elements. 4. To provide a basis for contingency planning for redevelopment following a severe earthquake or other disaster. S. To provide a basis for including knowledge of earthquake hazards and other existing or potential hazards into consideration in zoning, subdivision, and other development ordinances. 6. To provide a basis for including knowledge of earthquake hazards • and other hazards in mandatory referrals, environmental impact statement reviews, and other project reviews. 7. To provide a basis for updating local emergency services plans in terms of post-disaster response and recovery. ORIGIN OF THE SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT. The requirement that California cities and counties address seismic safety in their general plans is a direct result of the substantial increase in man's knowledge of the causes and effects of earthquakes in recent years. Along with the understanding that earthquakes are caused by on-going geologic processes, and are not random "acts of God", has come a conviction that society should use its technical knowledge to minimize their effects. This is particularly true for those areas of the earth where history records that most earthquakes have taken place and where geological science tells us that most earthquakes will happen in the future. California lies in one of those belts of the earth where the land- scape is still being formed by the geologic forces that generate earthquake activity. Worldwide, the U.S. Coastal and Geodetic Survey 2 00126 f i earthquakes r year. Annually, California reports approximately 5,000 eathan quakes which will be strong can expect to experience more than S0O easels hs. It should be enough to be recorded by general purpose seismographs-California�recognized that the monitoring of earthquakes in Caiis much better than the world generally but seismologists beMieventha;ifpp�ox.l ;. t 1 1 to T r rr nt of th , Nrld•_ ^Vrl mnv• wis.aid to minimize their effects. This is-particularlyutruetforethoseaareawledge s of the earth where history records that most earth place and where geological science tells us that most tkehakes will happen in the future. California lies in one of those belts of the earth where the land- scape is still being formed by the geologic forces that generate earthquake activity. Worldwide, the U.S. Coastal and Geodetic Survey 2 00126 reports approximately 5,000 earthquakes per year. Annually, California can expect to experience more than 500 earthquakes which will be strong enough to be recorded by general purpose seismographs. (It should be recognized that the monitoring of earthquakes in California is much better than the world generally but seismologists believe that approx- imately 1 to 3 percent of the world's earthquakes occur in California.) The State's experiences with earthquakes have caused it to enact laws that have already saved lives and minimized injuries, and to create programs that promise substantial benefits in the future. One of these programs was the California Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety study effort, which saw some ofj its recommendations implemented even before it published its report. The requirement for General Plan Seismic Safety Elements, enacted in 1971, originated with this group. TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT The Seismic Safety Element is based on the Seismic Safety Element Tech- nical Background Report which is a staff study by the County Planning Department. The Technical Background Report was made to compile technical and methodological information that was too voluminous to include in a policy report. Its intent was to assemble information on seismic safety and organize it relative to Seismic Safety Element requirements. From this information were derived findings and policies and recommendations which have been carried over into this Seismic Safety Element. The sup- porting materials in the Technical Background Report however, are only summarized in this Element. A draft of the Technical Background Report was reviewed by an advisory group of experts and citizens before it was published, EARTHQUAKE OVERVIEW Before proceeding with the major parts of the General Plan Element, it is appropriate to discuss the characteristics and and effects of earth- quakes to ensure that users have a common basis for understanding the natural processes involved in seismic safety planning. The Nature of Earthquakes Earthquakes are sudden releases of strain energy stored in the earth's bedrock. The energy originates in the geologic forces that are causing the continents to gradually drift apart on the earth's surface. The process is called "plate tectonics" and will be discussed later- The earthquakes represent adjustments between these plates as they slip past one another to establish a new equilibriums. In the process, the features of local landscapes are being created as mountains and ridges are being raised up and as valleys are formed. M312 4. C�, Energy can be Wired in the earth's crust because its bedrock forma- tions are more or less elastic. Under pressure they may be permanently distorted or they may store the energy for later release. Like the hard steel of springs or the wood of bows, they can bend under pressure and hold the strain energy. They can release the pressure slowly, or they can "break" and release it rapidly (and often destructively). Earthquakes occur when either the bind of friction between rock masses is broken along an old crack, or when the shear strength of the hard rock material is exceeded, and it "snaps". Similar to the breaking process of certain metals or woods, the main break of an earthquake may be signaled by foreshocks and followed by aftershocks. The energy being received in local rock formations may be released almost as soon as it is generated or it may be accumulated and stored for long periods of time. `The individual releases may be so small and gentle that they are detected only by instruments or measured as "creep" occurring over time, or they may be massive and so violent that they cause destruction over vast areas. Earthquakes occur on the cracks in the bedrock, which are called geo- logic "faults". During an earthquake, opposite sides of the crack move relative to one another. The displacement may originate at great depth in the earth and be absorbed within the earth or it may extend from the bedrock through the ground materials to produce a surface break or "trace". The movement between the rock formations on either side of the fault may be horizontal, vertical, or combinations of these. The Cause of Earthquakes Earthquakes are thought to be a form of local adjustment to a world- wide geologic process called "continental drift" or "plate tectonics". It has been popular speculation for centuries that the earth's continents originated as a common land mass and gradually drifted apart, but it was not until discoveries were made of earth spreading under the Atlantic Ocean in the 1960's that scientists were able to piece together a global theory of drift that satisfactorily explained what was happening and why it was happening. According to this theory, the earth's crust is divided into a few vast plates which form its continents and underly its oceans. On the floors of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, molten material from within the earth is being forced to the surface through cracks in the crust and is causing the plates to spread apart and to revolve relative to one another, and consequently one over-rides another. Although earthquakes may happen anywhere on earth in response to this activity, it is not surprising that most occur in the zones of contact between plates. 4 001003 IMIMMW �1'11 oil, MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM�� FIGURE 1 PLATE TECTONICS 4 Mia AtIonti c 1-11IJdge l 1.iilu a -Lew vast plates which form it, wie '"�1�i,,'s crust its oceans. On the floors of the Atlantic its continents and underly material froom within the a and Pacific Oceans, molten cracks in the crust arab is being forced to the surface through revolve relative to one another,causing a the plates to spread apart and another. Although earth and consequently one over-rides to to this activity, earthquake ss Nay happen anywhere on earth in res Of contact between plates.is not surprising that most occur in the zones plates. 4 00122 FIGURE 1 PLATE TECTONICS b Mid-Atlantic Ridge Son Andreas Fault • • PACIFIC PLATE 1 9a 1:> A� 1F East PaICIfIC Rise E> A. The earth's "crust" is composed of several large "plates". These plates are slowly being pushed across the surface of the earth, away from the mid-ocean ridge systems. California is situated on the western edge of the Americas Plate, with the San Andreas fault forming the boundary between the Americas and Pacific Plates. The high seismicity of California is a direct result of its location on the edge of a plate. PACIFIC PLATE j - C3 — AMERICAS PLATE B. As the Americas Plate is shoved westerly, away from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, it over-rides the Pacific Plate. Because of its location on the west- ern edge of the Americas Plate, California has been subject to earthquakes, faulting and folding as the two plates collide and grind against one another. Movement of the Pacific Plate, away from the East Pacific Rise, accounts for the lateral (strike-slip) movement on the San Andreas fault. Source: Contra Costa County Planning Department Illustrations. 5 E California is located in one of the most seismically active areas of the earth. The explanation for this is that the state is located on the boundary between the plate underlying the Pacific Ocean and the one forming the American continent. The Americas Plate, as the latter is called, is thought to be "drifting" southwesterly relative to the Pacific Plate and being forced to over-ride the latter. The main line of contact between the two plates is the San Andreas Fault system. Simply stated, as these plates shove and grind against one another, movement occurs on the San Andreas Fault, or a fault parallel to it, and California has earthquakes. The San Andreas fault trends northwesterly through the Bay Area. The fault trace approximately coincides with a line connecting Crystal Springs Reser- voir in San Mateo County with Tomales Bay in Marin County. Thus, in the San Francisco area the fault is several miles offshore. Although the last great earthquake in the Bay Area occurred on the San Andreas Fault in 1906, that fault is paralleled by the Hayward, Calaveras, and other major faults. Together this fault system has given rise to at least six severe earthquakes since approximately 1800. The Effects of Earthquakes Beginning the instant an earthquake is triggered, a series of events which can have serious consequences for property and people is set into motion. These involve interaction between seismic forces on one hand and natural features and man-made structures on the other. From the location along the earthquake fault where energy is released (the "focus"), force is radiated outward in the form of waves which are only gradually dissipated. Near the focus, the forces may be strong enough to physically stress landforms and buildings, while at greater distances the waves can be detected only with instruments. The earthquake generates sev- eral types of waves. 'these waves travel at different speeds and arrive at places on the earth's surface at different times. These intervals, recorded by instruments, allow earthquakes to be located. As previously noted, the shear movement within the earth's crust that always occurs during an earthquake may cause displacement along an existing fault or the creation of new fault breaks. The displacement may rupture the earth's surface, where it would stress or shear objects or buildings on it. Even if the displacement is confined to the bedrock and lower ground layers, however, it could disrupt drainage and damage building foundations and other objects straddling it. Faults are seldom single cracks but typically are braids of breaks that comprise shatter zones. These link to form networks composed of major and minor faults. Movement typically occurs along the major faults, but a new path may be taken through a network, or a series of adjustments may occur on minor faults. A fault having recorded r e 6 0 0 30 ^1�Llllg vault or the creation of new.1 Lu fault__ along an may rupture the earth's surface, where it would stresshordshear cobjects or buildings on it. Even if the displacement is confined to the bedrock and lower ground layers, however, it could disrupt drainage and dams e building foundations and other objects straddling it. g Faults are seldom single cracks but typically are braids of breaks that comprise shatter zones. These link to form networks composed major and minor faults. fa •yovement typically occurs along the major faults, but a new path may be taken through a network or a series of adjustments may occur on minor faults. A fault having recorded 00130 4` movement, or one which has visibly disturbed the ground over it, is regarded as "active" and is more likely to generate a future earthquake than a fault which shows no signs of recent movement. Although rock or ground rupture along a fault is dramatic, the physical effects of faulting are highly localized. Not so are the effects of ground shaking which are widespread and cause most earthquake damage. In a Great earthquake, major damage from ground shaking can occur over 100 miles from the source of the earthquake. The force which radiates outward from an earthquake is transmitted through the hard rock crust in short, rapid vibrations; these are transformed into long, deep motions when the waves enter soft ground materials. Sometimes, the undulations are long and deep enough to be visible as they move across the surface. Buildings can be designed and built to resist the short-movement shaking that is characteristic of solid ground, but it is difficult or im- possible for a building to withstand the "lofting" motion of shaking in soft ground. Ground put into motion by an earthquake can fail if its limits of cohesion are reached: landslides and ground slippages are induced in susceptible areas. Areas with steep slopes typically experience slides and slumps. Damaging slips have occurred in areas of almost imperceptible slope. Lique- faction is a form of failure which can happen when water-saturated sandy ground is put under pressure by earthquakes. Liquid under pressure forces soil particles apart to create quicksand-like conditions that destroy soil strength and thereby undermine the support of structures. Earthquakes can cause flooding, and for a variety of reasons. Dams and levees may fail under earthquake stress. Land may slip into water bodies, driving flood water onto adjacent areas. Tsunami ("tidal waves") may be generated in oceans and large water bodies. Faulting, ground shaking, ground failure, and flooding are the natural effects of earthquakes, but these phenomena are most meaningful to human beings in terms of lives lost, persons injured, buildings des- troyed, and property damaged. The great majority of earthquakes are not dangerous to life or property either because they occur in sparsely populated areas or because they are small earthquakes which release relatively small amounts of energy. However where urban areas are located in regions of high seismicity, damaging earthquakes are expectable if not completely predictable events. . • j. EARTHWAKE MEASUREMENT In addition to a common understanding of earthquake causes and effects, it is desirable for Seismic Safety Element users to have a common under- standing of the terms used to describe earthquakes. This section, there- fore, covers the measurement "scales" used in this document. Earthquakes are typically described by their strengths. The original way of classifying earthquakes is according to how they are felt and what effects are observed by people. A currently-used version of such a system of rating "intensity" is the Modified Mercalli Scale (Appendix B) which assigns Roman Numerals to earthquakes on a scale of 1 to XII. An earthquake of '"M.M. I" inten- sity probably would not be sensed at all by most people, but one of ""M.M XII"' would destroy most buildings and distort the landscape. The modern systems measure earthquake size according to the "magnitude" of the energy release and express this amount on a mathematical scale. The Richter Scale, which expresses earthquake magnitude on a logarithmic scale, is the best known example of the latter. Although most people evidently prefer to use the "language" of the in- strumentally measured Richter Scale to the Modified Mercalli Scale's terminology of human perceptions in describing the strength of earth- quakes, few understand the tremendous increases in energy releases which are being registered as readings move up the scale. Each Richter Scale unit increase in the scale (say, a change in reading from 1.0 to 2.0) means a 10-fold increase in the size of the wave transmitted by the earthquake or, roughly 37 times the energy released by it. An earth- quake measuring 3.0 on the Richter Scale would be roughly 1,000 times more powerful than one registering 1.0 (i.e., an increase of 2 full units on the scale). A third measurement system that is as informal as the mathematical scales are precise is the use of descriptive titles for earthquakes of various strengths. According to this arrangement, earthquakes may be classified according to the names listed in Table 1. 8 ..s.. TABLE1 DESCRIPTIVE TITLES FOR EAR'II�Q� RichterIntensit Effects DescrigtiVe Ma itude Title .r ..z.. 8 �OZ32 .rv,.y... TABLE 1 DESCRIPTIVE TITLES FOR EARTHQUAKES Descriptive Richter Title Magnitude Intensity Effects Micro earthquake 1 - 3.9 Only observed instrumentally or felt only near the epicenter. Modified Mercalli Scale, inten- sity IV or less. Minor earthquake 4 - S.9 No surface fault movement. Felt at distances of up to 20 miles from epicenter. May cause slight damage (Modified Mercalli Scale, VII) in small area. Moderate earthquake 6 - 6.9 Severe earthquake range. Fault rupture probable; landslides Major earthquake 7 - 7.9 triggered by shock waves; lique- faction and ground failure. Damage Great earthquake 8 - 8+ extends over a broad area, depen- ding on magnitude and other factors. Maximum intensity ranges from VIII to XI on the Modified Mercalli Scale. Compiled by Contra Costa County Planning Department. The overall strength of an earthquake is its most important character- istic but not the only characteristic needed to be known for seismic safety planning or construction design. Other important attributes include an earthquake's duration, its related number of stress cycles and its accelerations. Structures capable of withstanding more power- ful earthquakes can fail in a less severe earthquake of long duration or one having especially high accelerations. Earthquake characteristics are measured by instruments called seismo- graphs. General purpose seismographs record stronger earthquakes occurring anywhere on the earth while microseismic instruments record events of usually 4.0 magnitude or smaller and for a local area. Both types usually record continuously. In contrast, the strong motion seismograph (accelerograph) is inoperative until it is triggered by a strong earthquake. Histories compiled by seismographs are necessary to evaluate the risk to an area according to the number and strengths of future earthquakes. Information on large and small earthquakes is also critical in locating earthquake faults and determining whether or not faults are active. Accelerograph information is used in the pre- paration of building codes and in the design of structures. 9 _: (14233 PUBLIC RESPONSE TO SEISMICITY Mankind has the capability, through wise building and land development. practices and land use planning--taking into account the materials and forces of the earth itself--to minimize the destructiveness of even the most severe earthquakes. In an area of high seismicity, planning, development, and building should incorporate scientific and engineering knowledge of earthquake causes and the reponse of ground and structures to earthquake forces. All levels of government responsible for guiding and regulating development and building in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies and procedures, and enact legislation, to ensure the application of scien- tific and engineering knowledge to the protection of lives and property. 10 00134 t' LOCAL SEISMICITY k 00135 c INTRODUCTION The previous chapter discussed seismicity as a geologic process. It showed that earthquakes are natural phenomena caused by worldwide geologic forces that are forming the earth's continents and ocean basins. It provided a context for explaining seismic activity in Contra Costa County and the Say Area. The basic natural landscape of Contra Costa County was built by those geologic forces that generate earthquakes and produce earthquake faults. They have operated for millions of years, and there is no reason to believe that the forces will cease to change the County's landscape in the future. Less dramatically, the County's landscape is being altered by the natural processes of erosion and deposition (which are affected by local climate and vegetation) as well as by man. The resulting ground materials and landforms are more or less susceptible to seismic activity. Some, such as the slip-prone hill soils and the water-saturated sediments of interior valleys and shoreline plains, are highly vulnerable. By knowing what geological hazards are present in the County and where these are located, better public and private decisions can be made on the appropriate uses of land and the standards of construction for buildings. GENERAL COUNTY GEOLOGY Bedrock Geology The bedrock underlying the County is formed of great blocks of rock which themselves are composed of warped layers of sedimentary or metamorphic material. This "jumble" of blocks reflects a long geologic history during which sedimentary rocks were deposited under ancient seas and then folded and broken by the crush of the Pacific floor being forced under the American continent--a compression movement that is also forcing the core of Mt. Diablo upward through younger bedrock. Although most of the County's bedrock originated on the continental land mass (the "Americas Plate"), some is Pacific Ocean floor material. The joints between the bedrock blocks under Contra Costa County are by definition, "faults", and the movements that separated them were accom- panied by earthquakes. Periodic adjustments to relieve the strain caused by the Pacific floor being forced under coastal California must continue and most of the shifts are expected to occur along those joints that show signs of movement are termed "'active". 00133 ata N E'`t�C,obtQ � CP Qr. n¢ G? n p Z ! rO- to t� n 1�♦♦♦� c 4 p I" �� 2 \N d 00000 rte � i, � ._.. • Ado C's ` C00%vo COSt a Q loo 01 G• a f mar O O a 0 40 a+ 12 00137 Y I IAI its 4 C_ �. 0 Is 31, ,,ts 94 � •.r:.:..... .. =i. v 5t.f •>'::::':;•s•,:�.,; � It iiv w 3 o i C 3 z Ila OA ft IF ,ell I _ J//! �/J/yj, !! !f / / ,�Llj�f,7/�j/ /lJ� ^•gin .•r'T\ f y' rr r, s •y��Ji/I !J ,b�J ,`;f�;j � ' �J/! ...i:`.::;=' JJJ /! J / ""°�-�'• 1 '1 ✓ - � ••!'''-'�•�r• •j/!/�/ J/JJJ i /JJJ �1 o -r �' � - /- �Q:f t/ a JJJ ,,// ,, ., �J4•�.: Q Q }�'•�-•• - / ,J J/ J J/ / •t %•+ii;•'-"�• ✓'✓ t j�='rte' x y.''{�:�/ 'ri i'S•(tG''iy'' 0, � �• ,,,,. '+ J%/t t/G! yJ/j J l/ J�J/��J ^•✓.•J�%�y-, �r�' .� �r�;'�v ,�.%.r.,frY yy.. Q Q. Q„N� � `/!J ! �it /!//�///IrJJ .'+ir, . 1ti� 4i..' j � ra�. i ,Sl fa 0 d1 \:':_' w ="'.r' .' /F ! $// //!! /t t ^,,� •� ,,fYr r 's r ? ti+.. O. �•Q Q I � '!, , t� jtJ! '/ r! fOJJJJJJ/!/j//�( r? N „!}i :„1/ A4:„! ••' �r'.a.-'r ..r Q '"'' � / t ' 7f / l!T!/�/!J/1%!!/ 1s ' w"'� s x'.,r vt - f✓i`./•'•.y a M � � - / ./ � /J/_X////rj/ +r �jj' art••'' r �y^./ r ��.r tr.�..r J.j' � � .i• Q. � - � / i i ! // !,!t r/r+t ���/ /.,�,I..G f' .. r s .,M�,/lJ��. o Q f j�r,,,,,^� ! •/ },c 3 iL .. r r y rt ,�,•'.y Sj� /•� � Q'Q• � «';yJ f.r •s y. r` ,�4” � o}. FGr '” l.-� it ! a t�J 7 OM.•= ,,•. /* <r -•,yr - r f ' f (moi f t y'r •�;'ri+ 1r5 fe o .t w i �� .t• ��" k^ s-, „Lim Q � d � Q =rF - •,,� n � 0 3 0 r TABLE 2 GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION AND ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS GENERALIZED STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION GENERAL LITHOLOGK DFWHFFICN REMARKS G"cludes stopr,stability, • Geologic Aye(Absolute Age') ew*gvake stability,etc.l. QUATERNARY Holocene d Alluvium Includes oil types of allw-W depwiss. In coarrol Lave.wa»r-wtvrered deposits pawls Pleistocene Cost GanYo it is srpyaMd hare C P*m Cwso Gravis vowy adverse erginefrfng characteristics, by an arpelar uKeriarm:sy. Including tow wismic stability,question- able bearing strength;pronufater material may haw high licRefsctiorh potential,etc. TERTIARY Pliocene Comm Cato Gold hal Gasalt Cisr4ka ervr,sond kmo.sibsssnps e.;sh m;.m Slow stability poor. Abundant slides in (1-111 Group Sieve Fosr AAW aeonmhts of l:messame awd ka.wpid foci"cleanpeu boos sort and rac4,on natural and at Mowya Fowno6on Some 6aolt and aedes:sr 1-olarucl Bows. Clamics siopes. Oriwdo Fshnrmatim ams w:-cansAWassd cued cWWQ;n wonseor:lion:» clay. TopapsaplSc fasm h:piJy variable. Miocene San Pablo Neroly Sandstone Peedmm:na sly wwiwe sandseant,with Lowbeds Slope stability condition moderate to (11-25) Group Cwrbo Soshdstorse of sl-ale,silts%, mrd arwat camglaemra». good. Generally stand►in 1:1 cuts with (D:obb Range) 111". %Sandgone Uppw pan ineirda same roe-rvorwe beds erk+or dough4v. Locally farm slopes a„ (e.g.Diablo So --:aw of Weaver.1944) to a seep that deveteprnent moy be difficult. For lim:tatfon,we coscim;isn 7 Franciscan bmwoon. V Mastery Rodeo Shale Sil➢dsae shiele and raw We& $ee above. ` Group Hambro Sandstone Some asses of rI Vdueieolly bedded ciu► (&;ages fi1h) Tice S604 and 111o4, fl'ilsudnam:s places. UWW in Cl.. I Sisk modesaselr steep to%seep Ldihid.s i"GPiames silk. Sobs- Sandstone Oligocene Son Gaemw Fonio- TufFxeous somdaoee.seff;.eso.caploseuare See above. (25-4) tion and silss+oee. Eocene ,MadderM Forseaeiors daaieantly iwdurasrd bed".6Kk.&wp Slope stability generally good;stands in (40-60) Nyrtowdlis Shale t shale,siltsene and sadsw. 1:1 stapes with minor sfouglsing. Doemnpam Sasdsmwe S FvAwhA n conditions vary with moserfal. Maisano.iommtiow For Geritotions set d1scussion of Franciscan fornsation. Poleoeene Mamie:Fowmation Morswe.glarmw:»semmisiawe.a:lsssass and See above. (60-70) 1610. CRETACEOUS Franciscan Great Polley Gnat Valley Sawsoesc Massive beds of sandamw Slope stability and fiwndotion conditions Fomwtion So*— ohe at:rg.dtb si bsseas cued%bole. Y:wor cowplo- vary with material,but generally good an-1 .li as-, and Gge+». Coeple�ly folded to fair union sheared ar weathered. and faulted. Ouasops;w Wanes fills and Di" For CmeitaNaro,we discussion of Rage. Franciscan formation below. Eorthquake stability high. CRETACEOUS- Franciscan: llli-v :Pallsr bedded gPorwocie Slope stability and foundation conditions JURASSIC +oPdeorses,$66.49tstes 1.radolmiom iw fresh Pock generally good. Limitotiae cfnrt,greewerowe. ,11- exasua sof limine- subject to landsliding where intensely scone cued MAist. hAWly mayssdtiwed sheared of weathered;cap slopes hazar- ad iwtwrded by sempsntiem ad eesociared dow--iwuld be cut at lower angle than W-aus was. Ssrangly deformed. dip of beds. Earthquake stability high (:.e.had bedrock such as Frmciscon ten;&to a►rsrwNe earthWake waves, reducing ground motion). *Units of ubsoluse aye we 441liom of years below peswo. Modified after Radbnrch(1969) Compiled by Contra Costa County Planning Deportment 14 . 00138�� I The oldest bedrock on the surface in the County is the strata of the "Franciscan Formation". It is thought that this group originated on the Pacific floor and was "welded" to the western margin of the American con- tinent by plate movement. Subsequently was pushed upward through younger sedimentary rock: to form the backbone of the Diablo Range. Isolated out- crops also appear in some other portions of the County. Befitting this history, the rock strata of this formation are highly distorted and its layers of sedimentary rock are partially metamorphosed through heat and compression. It is intruded by a rock called serpentine as well as other (volcanic) rocks which originated in the earth's molten core. The relative hardness of the rocks in this formation gives them good overall behavioral characteristics during earthquakes. But, it is associated with rough topo- graphy, and the weathered or sheared materials of some of its steep slopes may be susceptible to landsliding. The next oldest bedrock formation in the County is the so-called "Great Valley Sequence". These are sedimentary rocks laid down under ancient seas that once existed on the American continent. Its strata have been folded but less extremely than those of the Franciscan Formation, and the layers are not as highly altered as the Franciscan. Still, the rock tends to be hard and behave well during earthquakes; again, with the exception of certain hinds of slopes which are prone to instability. Great Valley Sequence bedrock: is primarily found in the rough topography of the Diablo Range and Briones Hills. The youngest thoroughly consolidated ("hard") bedrock in the County is the group laid down during the geologic age known as the "Tertiary". These strata of largely sedimentary rocks have been folded like their predeces- sors, but because they have not been as hardefied by geologic processes their reponses to earthquakes are much more variable. Certain of the con- stituent groups of rocks, such as the Orinda Formation, tend to be weak and highly susceptible to landslides. It is expected that these weaker areas would experience numerous instances of ground failure during strong earth- quakes. Significantly, many of the foothill areas of the County now coming under development are underlain by Tertiary age bedrock. The youngest surface formations in the County (aside from soils) are the deposits of the "Quaternary" age. These vary widely--from Bay muds to sand dunes to the alluvial materials of the floor of the San Joaquin Delta-- but they are characteristically unconsolidated or semi-consolidated. From the perspective of seismic safety planning, the older, coarser, and well- drained materials tend to be stable during earthquakes, while the younger, fine-grained, and water-saturated deposits tend to be less stable. Earthquake fault movements that disturb Quaternary deposits typically provide proof of "activity". 1S ooa�► x Planning Implications i Geologic conditions should be a primary determinant of land use in Contra Costa County. (Geologic conditions include faults and other geologic sub- jects covered elsewhere in this plan.) Generally, urban or suburban uses or intensities should not be planned for areas where geologic conditions would result in unacceptable risks to life and safety, and areas where the public costs of overcoming geologic deficiencies would exceed public benefits. Because it is impractical for government to prepare geologic information at great detail on a Countywide basis, it is preferable to deal with geologic conditions through "project review" requirements rather than to make them parts of ordinances. The County should require geologic information to be submitted for Environ- mental Impact Reports, and zoning and subdivision applications, for a wide range of development projects (except for small projects in geologically stable areas) . The Contra Costa County Planning Department should develop an administra- tive map primarily for project review operations, based on the mapping of the U.S. Geological Survey. Geologic formations should be classified ac- cording to their characteristics for land use appropriateness. Available geology mapping can be used until this map is prepared. LOCAL EARTHQUAKE FAULTS Characteristics and Classification Earthquake faults were described earlier as bedrock joints or cracks made by movements to relieve stress in the earth's crust. The likelihood is that future movements--accompanied by earthquakes--will occur on existing breaks, but even dormant faults (by altering natural drainage and other phenomena) affect natural features and man-made development over them. All faults are important, then, even though it is obvious that those with the more evident potentials for movement warrant more consideration than those likely to remain dormant. Faults vary in importance, but there is no really satisfactory classifica- tion. Faults dividing large parts of the earth, such as the San Andreas fault separating the Pacific Ocean floor from the American Continent, are normally of greatest importance, but strain accumulated by plate movement may be relieved by movements of major subsidiary faults (such as the Hay- ward or Calaveras) which are important regionally, or by lesser faults (such as the Concord) which are important locally. All of these probably are inter-connected--if not physically, then by strain patterns. This is to say that they are, from a local perspective, all parts of a grand system. The amount of energy that a fault can accumulate and release seems to depend on its length, within limits. Therefore, only the longer faults, such as the • 16 30140 t San Andreas, Hayward or Calaveras, appear to be capable (by application of this rule) of generating Great or Major earthquakes. But, some experts fear that several lesser faults could "link" to jointly produce more power- ful earthquakes. Another way of classifying faults is by their activity, a method that assumes that faults which have moved in the recent past are those that have the highest probability of moving again in the future. The principle is reasonable provided the exceptions and evidence are understood. All faults have moved in the past, and any can move in the future, but only those which are measurably moving now are indisputably active. A fault may be considered to be active if seismographs have recorded movement on it or if past movement has produced a "fingerprint" by off-setting soils and ground laid down since the last Ice Age (which left a break in the ground between old and new earth materials). Faults Showing Activity Faults in Contra Costa County that have shown signs of activity include the Hayward and Calaveras faults which have been the source of severe earthquakes in historic time that were accompanied by surface faulting. Other faults, such as the Antioch, Concord, and Pleasanton faults are con- sidered to be active by the U.S. Geological Survey because they exhibit features which have been interpreted as evidence of tectonic creep. With regard to public safety, the most critical fault in the County is the Hayward fault which passes through several West County communities. Currently, it is creeping in several locations and it was the source of severe earthquakes in 1836 and 1868. Because of the relatively small pop- ulation that existed in the Bay Area in the nineteenth century, the damage potential of past earthquakes was somewhate limited. The Antioch fault and the Concord fault are also associated with damaging earthquakes in the County. A 5.4 magnitude earthquake on the latter reportedly did $1,000,000 damage in 1955. Other Local Faults In addition to the faults which have been classified as active, there are others in the County whose activity status has not been clearly established by existing information. The prominent faults of undetermined status include the Pinole, Bolinger, Las Trampas, Franklin, Southampton, Clayton-Marsh Creek, Midland, and Mt. Diablo faults. Each of these either has shown inconclusive signs of activity (at least within the County) or is associated with geologic pro- cesses or features that could result in earthquakes. Similarly, there is a system of radial and concentric faults surrounding Mt. Diablo which are not known to be active but which were created by the mountain's uplift through younger rocks--a process which is still occurring. 00141 r ' g Detailed geologic maps show numerous minor faults throughout Contra Costa County. Few are likely to be active (or capable of generating an earthquake) but they need to be located, studied and avoided in the course of developing land. Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act The Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act charges the State Geologist with responsibility for preparing maps delineating Special Studies Zones of appropriate width for all potentially and recently active traces of the San Andreas, Hayward, Calaveras and San Jacinto faults, and it made provision for the State Geologist to zone other faults where the avail- able evidence was adequate. Within Contra Costa County, the faults which were zoned in the initial phase of the mapping included the Hayward fault, an unnamed fault in the Pinole area, unnamed faults in the Martinez area,- the Concord fault, a segment of the Calaveras fault and the Pleasanton fault. The enabling legislation also charged the State Mining and Geology Board with responsibility for formulating policies and criteria affecting all development applications which come under the authority of the Alquist- Priolo act. The enabling legislation specifies that policies and criteria of the Board be embodied in the policies and development regulations of affected local jurisdictions. The State is presently reviewing the Antioch fault for placement in a Special Studies Zone. The Alquist-Priolo act requires cities and counties to exercise specified approval authority with respect to new real estate development and most types of new construction within the Special Studies Zone. Specific poli- cies and criteria to assist local jurisdictions are provided by the State Mining and Geology Board. Other requirements and guidelines are provided by the Alquist-Priolo act. The Alquist-Priolo act does not pertain to existing development, or to the construction of wood-frame, single family homes on existing lots. The act also exempts certain alterations or additions to existing structure. To date the Alquist-Priolo act has been administered as a matter of Board of Supervisors' policy. But, the County has gained experience in administering this law, and it appears feasible and desirable to corporate these regula- tions into an ordinance. Planning Implications All faults, to varying degrees, should be given consideration in the de- sign of developments and in site preparation. For example, it should be recognized that many minor, presumed inactive faults in the County inter- sect active or potentially active faults. Any movement on the master fault could trigger adjustments on minor cross faults or adjacent subparallel faults. Additionally, structures sited on faults may be exposed to high stress concentrations during earthquakes on distant faults owning to the differing ground response of material beneath their foundation. Finally, the crushed material in the fault zone as well as the contrasting engine- ering characteristics of material on opposite sides of a fault can pose a number of special engineering problems. 18 0�►i42 as 1 s : o s • cr c 1 ` i �✓ c D -n -n nM S. .• .. V H .•' � 0 .Qr � rt tA Z C CL a j PA /.01 O w .41 00 16 O �' Q r� l 1 �=•f �i '.'. r C 7O —•, Q W C to o m a CCA N C /f / o �, •` // ` .r C < —)06 .r `� ••� / , �' F j, 1♦� —.ire �!ol p , Q !! do, v / H I—�I ���� f/�tet.•• � ' • •' ��- � / ♦ j I <�� t r i t ♦� s L� / ��•: % j. 31 le do do .:.'0:... *.dp• e • c rr. L e ri op / / `401P ap r ` , • •• 1 �i nco CL C Q �, O N O W m �`_ .� .•..• i 6- 0 Q 1 .• ---.........• •.y ...•. �l Z o o 2:-0a 3 ` p C < 0 Oi t^p w —1 p C CO w Oi _. Q ••1 �. 0 /� 3 � � n + I/' o t ♦ v /""� ♦ is /�' / ' � \`��� �\\�\:.�-�• •�..•�• \ 417 / � 40, 40 It / ♦ s r .00 00 i • � ♦ � '� ems Q N q Q. C Q _rA533•• 7 fn M 0 a fn m 40 Q � Q �� is • = i ' � !P p N <CL 0 � O A C = A i N n 1 O rr' C w O ` • { 1 •� 1 ti. Q n -* �- 0 a 1 1Z.. -•N. _ C •:1RrfQNt161n O O W 0 Irk 0 m o IW 0 s = Xs 3 C r F � o _ s =s D t a s N.r trSol O O p 40 fir,► _ _ 0 w 7� Q s r # 7° 4 qJ a s s =n o s. 0 Z . N d o s < s Az z CEO _ t s IL < � n t `2 t t e : ki WI- " ;; _?-k _ , Vi IM_ '13. p i it,G to IR; N% I IIA a t } g i ' 20 iStructures intended for human occupancy must not be erected over an "active" fault trace and to the extent practicable, structures intended for human occupancy should not be erected over the trace of an "inactive" fault. Setbacks should take into account the varying degree of seismic risk and consequences of failure. To the extent practicable, structures which affect the provision of needed services (e.g., highway interchanges, utilities) should not be erected over the trace of an active or potentially active fault. Where it is deemed essential to do so for the public welfare, these structures should be designed to accommodate or minimize the effects of fault displacement and seismically-triggered ground failure. Land in the setback areas along active and potentially active fault traces should be utilized for open forms of land use that could experience dis- placement without endangering large numbers of people or create secondary- hazards. Examples are yards, greenbelts, parking lots, and non-critical storage areas. Roads, particularly those which carry large volumes of traffic, should be sited over active faults only where other alternatives are impractical. A geologic investigation and report should be required for all subdivisions and planned unit developments which are crossed by mapped faults. Because of the relatively greater significance of the major fault systems (listed in Table 3), subdivisions and planned unit developments within approximately 1/8 miles of such a fault should have geologic reports. Contra Costa County, through its Planning Department, should prepare a "fault map" for use in the administration of project reviews (e.g., Environ- mental Impact Reports and mandatory referrals) and in the administration of development ordinances. Preferably, this map should be done on a countywide basis and in the form of a map series at a scale of 1:24,000 (1" = 20001) to make efficient use of U.S. Geological Survey and Division of Mines and Geology fault information. The generalized fault map can be used until this more detailed map, is available. EARTHQUAKES--PAST AND FUTURE Earthquake History Every earthquake, great or small, is important to the area where it is - felt. Each earthquake helps locate active faults and establish proba- bility patterns for projecting future earthquakes. 21 0914 v. 'The written history of Contra Costa County indicates that it has exper- ienced frequent earthquakes- Early explorers and settlers in the Bay Area told of earthquakes that must have been felt in Contra Costa County, at has been maintained since the early 1800's but the continuous history th EARMQUAKES--PAST AND FUTURE Earthquake History Every earthquake, great or small, is important to the area where it is - felt. Each earthquake helps locate active faults and establish proba- bility patterns for projecting future earthquakes. 0 S 21 0914 The written history of Contra Costa County indicates that it has exper- ienced frequent earthquakes. Early explorers and settlers in the Bay Area told of earthquakes that must have been felt in Contra Costa County, but the continuous history that has been maintained since the early 1800's clearly shows that the County has been subject to numerous seismic events. To show the pervasiveness of seismic events in this region, one authority has estimated that there have been approximately 60 damaging earthquakes in the Bay Area since 1800. Almost all of these were felt in Contra Costa County, and some did extensive damage here. Some of these originated on faults located within the County and some in other parts of the region. There is no question that the six major Bay Area earthquakes occurring since 1800 affected the County: the 1836 earthquake produced a fissure along the Hayward fault in western county from San Pablo far into Alameda County; the 1861 earthquake on the Calaveras fault broke the surface for 8 miles through .San Ramon Valley; the 1868 earthquake on the Hayward fault damaged the Court- house in Martinez; and the 1906 San Francisco earthquake on the San Andreas fault caused widespread damage here. Fortunately the County did not bear the main brunt of the San Francisco quake but two earlier Nineteenth Century major earthquakes were certainly, destructive here. Two of the three fault systems that produced these six major earthquakes pass through Contra Costa County. Interestingly, these six major Bay Area earthquakes happened in the 70-year period ending in 1906, while none has occurred in the comparable period since then. Experts do not yet know if the 1906 earthquake released so much strain that there will be no major earthquakes for awhile or if the Bay Area fault systems have been accumulating energy for most of the Twentieth Century. To some, the absence of some slippage along the San Andreas fault in the upper Bay Area indicates that energy is being stored. The lack of a long period of written history here is a hindrance to under- standing possible earthquake "cycles". (In some parts of the world, the seismic history goes back more than a thousand years.) Although lesser earthquakes in Contra Costa County have been sporatically reported for more than a century, the County has been systematically monitored by general purpose seismographs only since 1934 (and only since 1970 by small motion seismographs) . The general purpose instruments of the University of California have recorded nearly 600 earthquakes with intensity readings of 2.0, or greater, on the Richter Scale during the ensuing (and relatively quiet) 40-year period. The generalized distribution of these earthquake epicenters is arrayed on Figure 3, which also shows the surface locations of major faults for rela- tionship. Some of the difference between epicenter and fault locations are due to inexact locational or mapping technology; other differences reflect the slanting of the fault break through the bedrock; but, still other differ- ences may indicate that lesser earthquakes are taking place on minor faults, 2? 00146 • O a � � 2 A R-'. • O � N l<V m • • O • n o ��• ' ~s r � ._ h p. 1 O 3 Q m o ♦ l a n 3 Z •t o •„ Zqb T_ s O Cb w < -o � c 3 W0 h3 CD N o s i f' a O ;/ 31 ^�- a 0 C A A 16 � rA C Ot y� CA) O 4A a N q r 'hyo= / ' �'JV N ;n10 -fl CD N , � idolp / • .; c dop CL 0 j. A10 _ • w 1 •J lee .. � /� / � •is ..�% .' -.� !r - ---- � � �� ..�'• �� raw � � � %Ox ._ �- 2 � • , .01 Irl. � • ` '` I 'E i!• A do de Iwo • / �P o0 -0 r' E: p ", N N \ • Imo_ / I i .� ..w•+ 4A CA �D CIA O •, mmzi Otn _ C 3 to m o a O 7 A. A• 7 ` "` . IX T O ~. tp O -•~- - .. ....... ... N »- �D � • t or on undiscovered active faults, in the County. Seismic Activity in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra. Costa County Western Contra Costa County has experienced severe levels of ground shaking during moderate to great earthquakes on the San Andreas (1838, 1865, 1906) and Hayward faults (1836, 1868) as well as earthquakes on unknown faults, such as the Mare Island earthquake of 1898. These seismic events have re- sulted in ground shaking intensities ranging as high as X (very severe) on the Modified Mercalli Scale. During the past forty years approximately one hundred earthquakes have been recorded which have epicenters in western Contra Costa County or adjacent Alameda County. Although no fault rupture has accompanied any of these earthquakes, it is reasonable to attribute most of these siesmic events to the Hayw-ard fault. During this period, the largest earthquake to be recorded had a magnitude of- 4.S on the Richter Scale. Microseismic data, which is available only for the years 1970 through September 1973, shows a marked concentration of small earthquakes along the mapped trace of the Hayward fault. Additionally, numerous widely scattered microseismic epicenters have been plotted in the Briones Hills. Systematic interpretation is not possible at present but as the number of recorded earthquakes continues to increase it may prove feasible to assess the seismicity of the several mapped bedrock faults which bisect the hills. Within the central portion of Contra Costa County (which includes the Diablo- San Ramon Valley and the adjacent flanks of the Briones Hills and Diablo Range) are two known active fault zones and several potentially active fault zones. During historic time the largest earthquake to originate in the central portion of the County is the July 2, 1861 earthquake on the Calaveras fault. This event, which produced ground shaking rated as IX on the Modified Mercalli Scale in the Livermore area, reportedly produced a fissure 8 miles long on the west side of San Ramon Valley in southernmost Contra Costa County and adja- cent Alameda County. The central portion of the County has also experienced damage to structures and landslides have been triggered by earthquakes on the Hayward and San Andreas faults, as well as from earthquakes on unknown faults. The maximum levels of ground shaking from these events is known or inferred to have reached VIII on the Modified Mercalli Scale. Since 1954 nearly two hundred earthquakes have been recorded in central Contra Costa County by general purpose seismographs. Ten of these earth- quakes have had magnitudes ranging from 4.0 to 5.4. Although none of these events has been assigned to an earthquake fault, the location of the epi- centers suggest these earthquakes may be related to movements occurring at • depth on the Concord. Pleasanton and Livermore faults. The largest earth- quake during this period of time was the October 12, 1955 Concord earthquake 24 0JJ A p RVMWWof magnitude 5.4. Another notable seismic event is the 1970 earthquake swarm in the San Ramon Valley, east of Danville, which consisted of several hundred small magnitude earthquakes. Analysis of seismogram information indicates that a north-south trending fault to the east of the Calaveras fault is creeping. Historically, eastern Contra Costa County has been subject to relatively severe levels of ground shaking. One authority (Tolman) state that the areas adjacent to Carquinez Strait-Suisun Bay exhibited the highest levels of seismicity in central California prior to 1906. Within a forty-five year period, between July 1861 and April 1906, at least ten damaging earth- quakes produced strong ground motion in eastern Contra Costa County. Seven of these shocks are known or inferred to have produced maximum ground shaking of intensity VIII on the Modified Mercalli Scale. Of the many seismic events which produced strong ground motion in eastern Contra Costa County, two merit special mention. A severe earthquake in 1872 was centered in the Antioch area, where Modified Mercalli intensities reached IX or X. It appears reasonable to conclude that the earthquake emanated from the Antioch fault. A severe earthquake in 1892 was centered east of Fairfield. Significant damage occurred in Winter, Dixon, Vacaville and Suisun, and some damage was done as far away as Sacramento and Martinez. Although the fault responsible for these earthquakes is unknown, the only major fault in the epicentral area is the Midland fault. Since 1934 general purpose seismographs have recorded numerous small magnitude earthquakes (less than magnitude 4.0) in eastern Contra Costa County, but none of these events have been assigned to mapped faults. The largest earth- quake to have an epicenter in this portion of the County is the 1965 Antioch earthquake of magnitude 4.9. Earthquake Probability Man does not possess the capability to predict when, where, or how large the next earthquake will be. However, the "state-of-the-art" is rapidly advancing and consequently, our ability to predict the geographic location and timing of earthquakes can be expected to improve dramatically during the next decade. Several estimates of earthquake probability for the Bay Area have been made by scientific organizations, and their results are roughly comparable. A representative forecast by the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Admin- istration anticipated that the average return period was 17 years for a 6.0 magnitude earthquake, 32 years for a 7.0 event, and 170 years for an 8.3 event. Based on these figures, one would expect a moderately damaging earthquake on the average of every 17 years (t), a severely damaging earthquake (local dis- aster) on the average of once every 32 years, and a Great earthquake (regional disaster) on the average of every 170 years. Any of these forecasts, of course, _ 2S t. 00149 uul�y depend on the limited earthquake frequency information available here from a relatively short period of written history_ Using the available data and information, an earthquake probability esti- mate has been developed for Contra Costa County. It evaluates the likeli- hood that earthquakes capable of producing damage in Contra Costa County will occur on certain faults during a SO year period. (Fifty years is a rough average nominal life of a structure.) The forecast shows that a structure built in Contra Costa County is likely to be subjected to a severely damaging earthquake during its useful life, and it shows that the earthquake could originate in several locations. TABLE 4 APPROXIMATE PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE OF EARIHQUAKES ON SELECTED BAY AREA FAULTS (SO-year period) Approximate Probability of Causative Fault Magnitude Occurrence (over a 50-year period) San Andreas 7.0 - 8.0 Likely 8.0 - 8.S Intermediate Hayward-Wildcat 6.0 - 7.0 Likely 7.0 - 7.5 Intermediate Calaveras 6.0 - 7.0 Intermediate i 7.0 - 7,5 Intermediate - Low Concord S.0 - 6.0 Likely 6.0 - 7.0 Intermediate - Low LIKELY: Greater than 50% probability of occurrence INTERMEDIATE: 1S - 50% probability of occurrence LOW: Less than 1S% probability of occurrence Source: Contra Costa County Planning Department Estimates Design Earthquakes Mowing that a structure probably will be subject to a damaging earthquake during its useful life, it is only reasonable that it be designed to sur- vive the event, or to at least protect its occupants and functions. To do this, architects and engineers need to have information on earthquake characteristics, such as acceleration forces and duration. These character- istics have been estimated for certain faults_ The resulting table (Table S) may be used as an approximation of forces prevailing over a large area and as a beginning point for determining the forces affecting a particular loca- tion. The design earthquakes are not intended to be used as requirements for public • and private projects, but they should be used as points of departure by 26 03150 _.i TABLE 5 DESIGN EARTHQUAKES FOR KNOWN ACTIVE FAULTS AFFECTING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Hayward and Concord and San Andreas Calaveras Green Valley Fault Faults Faults Estimated Magnitude' Richter Scale) 7 to 8.25 6 to 7.5 6 to 7 Estimated Fault Offsert (feet) 4 to 30 1 to 8 1 to 4 Estimated Duration Strong Shaking3 (seconds) 24 to 37 5 to 30 5 to 24 Estimated Length of Tectonic Rupture4(miles) 40 to 300 5 to 70 5 to 25 Estimated Maximum Intensity$ (M.M.) VII to Vlll IX to X Vill to IX Estimated Peak Horizontal Accelerations in Bedrock6 (g's) E at 5 miles over .50 over .35 over .35 ,° > at 10 miles .35 to .50 .25 to .35 .25 to .35 1, a at 20 miles .20 to .35 .10 to .30 .10 to .25 v c t° at 30 miles .10 to .25 .05 to .20 .05 to .15 M U at 40 miles .05 to .20 .05 to .15 less than .1 at 50 miles .05 to .15 less than .1 less than .1 EXPLANATION Earthquake acceleration is expressed as a fraction of gravity (g) . Thus an acceleration of .Sg corresponds to an acceleration which is SO% of the value of gravity. At a distance of IO miles from the San Andreas fault, earthquake accelerations in bedrock are expected to be between .35g and .Sg. Local ground conditions and other factors could either increase or decrease expected accelerations. Sources. lEstinrotes based an historic seismicity of the Wt(Townley and Alksn. 1939),behavior of faults of similar length(Tocher. 195k Lino, 1965;Albes and Smith, 1967;Bonilla, 1967;Bonilla and Buchanan, 1970),and, where avoilo6ie.geologic history of displacement. 2&fwates based an historic offset associated with earthquakes in a specified eagnitude range (Bonilla,19700, 19706;VMollace, 1970;Ahpmaiumn,at al, 1971). 3Estimates based an records of the duration of shoking of historic eaff quakes(Greensfelder, 1973; Page,at al, 1972,p.3). 46tinrates basad an the geologic history of the haute and an the general relationship that exist between ear0quake aagnikde and the length of the associated tectonic rupture. (Bonillo, 1970a, 1970b,;Wollace, 1970). 5Estimotes based an rmcords at the intensity of shaking associated with h'Waric eortbquakn. The empirical relationship between magnitude and maximum intensity if given by M-1 t(213)1. 6EstimOtes based an accelerogram records of selected historic earthquake. (Grer►sfelder, 1973, Schnabel and Seed, 1974. Compiled by the Contra Costa County Planning Department. . 27 00151 qualified personnel in project background evaluations, and by engineers and architects in their development of structural design criteria. (Pre- nf armtnd motion on a particular building site requires site- • - n- -end -,n assessment of the effect j 2Estimates based an historic offset associated with eordrquakes in o specified engsitude range (Bonilla,19700, 1970b;Wblloce, 1970;Algermissen, at al, 1972). 3Estimates based an records of the duration of shaking of historic eortlrquaces(Greensfeldw, 1973; Page, et al, 1972,p. 3). 4Estir ates based an the geologic history of the fault and on the general relationship ow exists between earthquake magnitude and the length of the associated tectonic ruph". (Bonilla, 197000 1970b;Wallace, 1970). SEstinates based on records at the intensity of shaking associated with historic earthquakes. The empiricoi relationship between magnitude and mmdwaa intensity if given by M-I+(?/3)l. 6Estusotes based on occelerogram records of selected historic earthquoke. (Grensfeldw, 1973, SchnObeI and Seed, 1972). Compiled by the Contra Costa County ns Planni . Department. V - 00151 qualified personnel in project background evaluations, and by engineers • and architects in their development of structural design criteria. (Pre- diction of ground motion on a particular building site requires site- specific knowledge of ground conditions and an assessment of the effect of local geology in changing the characteristics of ground motion.) In the future, the County through its Planning Department should develop similar "design earthquake" data for other significant faults affecting building here. GROUND SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE Most damage from a major earthquake is caused by ground shaking or related forms of ground failure. The 1971 San Fernando earthquake was typical in that roughly 95% of the dollar damage was attributable to these phenomena, and only 5% to surface faulting. It is predictable that the primary cause of damage in Contra Costa County from either a Great earthquake on the San Andreas fault (or other fault outside the County) or even a moderate earthquake originating on a fault within the County would be ground shaking and seismically-triggered ground failure. Ground Shaking It was said earlier that local seismic ground shaking depends on not only the characteristics of the earthquake but on local ground conditions. Solid ground or rock tends to dampen ground motion while poorly consoli- dated and water-saturated materials amplify ground motion. During North America's two Great earthquakes of the Twentieth Century (San Francisco, 1906; Anchorage, 1963) it was observed that structures on solid ground near the epicenters frequently fared better than those located on weak materials located some distance away. The ways different areas of the County would react to ground shaking have been mapped using approximation methods described in the Technical Back- ground Report. As expected, the damage susceptibility of a particular building site is closely related to local ground conditions. Areas sit- uated on hard bedrock (e.g., Briones Hills, Las Trampas Ridge, Diablo Range) are expected to perform satisfactorily under earthquake conditions, provided that ground materials near the surface do not fail. Areas under- lain by firm, dry alluvium and weakly consolidated sedimentary rocks (e.g., Pinole Ridge, Orinda, Alamo, Tassajara) are considered to possess a moder- ately low to moderate damage susceptibility. Areas underlain by yound bay muds and deposits of the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta are considered to be potentially hazardous under earthquake conditions. Most of the County's development and population is located in areas of moderate to moderately low damage susceptibility. Liquefaction Liquefaction is a specialized form of ground failure caused by earthquake ground motion. It is a "quicksand" condition in water-saturated, • ,8 00152 Inman l -ell y: -� N a !f A ,tr 36 LIZ 00 Cal tam— � =4 I_ • v 4 as SQ O ti ,� G $8 � dit z CL am 34. M C .� l p ..+ 5 C ,y� O O .-/''%' � ////rr///f�/! J ✓/✓ter./// ,+�%�.. wn !f/ 1s.r -.. � kj► ///1/111 +yrs �✓ r= ! •`�t`.' /////1111 r ;� a51 ! a er tD ! .• ! C Q C CL a OV f"',-,•'fes �t, � � /rr !/j/�dd�� .• � �t •c:' Q ",='..�,. �as ' : /,, •��../ / .t,r �_�y'r 'r?7� 1/� r--f 1Y"-- ` ! �,' '',!rda�r�,�id!r,��,� r �"//�,�• rf �7.'k :;�S.:vS J J/�/J/ •„ ��y. + ► ... vd a�+l� h 1 �,• ,. f 1 f •� _ / +ter ° O �a © n 1w C � �Z., ,+ ', + ''-" ' ,-��-` �/ "'rte/''�+ i'.i' •+� i C ��`'-at.i � "rT '�'^+r :� � t r Yx+Y '"L...� r' a ry • ..� ,�'. �'". ��. �.`� t;,:,f'"'Sati..•• r,.•� ,� >�,.+. „� {ice �, .r s _M1i ry;,;,. J`f� ca,r3{ .,:-, ...'"'^+�...�_. r`yc„��r"":",r-r•; ,,.,��}�ICY ter•,.t.`y3� 4 ' 1' ..+c�X s r',-< � `,' i� '' '~`�. ,,,�..u? J (. s.d.�...__.F r . MTZ liz IC 41, el a3p =' D '"tea E'� � � �g � � •: a� � o•+ � m s ` gjcz ' °. o` N ? ; c �n 0 CL to 0 C oto 0 Q r) /lye c 0 CL v c :ct - 0 2; Z 0 0 z- c o ir Ir -. 4, - Z rn -4 0 > ;-4 fix rn Z!2 rn Hi 1 ut ZZ C-) to 0 C: 7 rn 'ZI up w 0 .4 c: 0 or 'all n 0 i S al l -a it 70 'a a t TT I Tr C. Iris S2 VIC lit -tt. Tit ve it Z rz 30 •, tp J/ t1 1Trt,�.r��.lt/ p i a R s VIL IL a. CA) 14 Q � N• rt a,1 o cg C 2-6 �� R m*ait t 64 CO g Q < z 3 � �• S C - 3 ; D C to m (a •% �, .moi. O C • � t V = C ' Ul �" -O*► ` e'- of y C- I: 1.411 Oee Ir CL 11 .$ ; �/:• :1 ii ♦Jlrr .. /1// ,, O � / O Cf f / !// I L2. �►' , f 1111 / ol ! -*- ate f t (� 1111!// Z tai► •O � ` f / r; 11!11 / � � � � �" � !lI/J///ft J." ��i r;I: f!/f//� / • G !Lca •+n ` r 11!fifff/fJf f!f/lff ,rye °' `�,,» � 1 d jl,�:..11�\ r//A/f/i /// yy �'J E !r iK¢".";'."nr f•'•."sr ,.nilj d � �..a �— ��V \ f/•.'f f;` J/ /i'/ � f J/ -i�/ r .'`.,..r� s �+' ~ f .rV/rr��.�z ,p'it th �� ,1-•r / r/ ! �: [[ i y / -.•«,• yr y r sr"r',�' '' Q K C •ap ! • r tl'I� i( X '�. r i. '. `rt'arr� �E'4K.: . � sK�.1..��.,y �� '".r. � f.s-._ y T.�•.. .�±, s,r fz r � :��°'J,rdv'"J�}r�,. � O V1 '�. �^+-.n � ttic ""'...,.�.s �, � .,. ..^'f - t•K' i 1V .ati � �',��,'r, 'j>t,•✓`'i,.3•;w .' '-+}ri�M.a. ft -.,fit •tJ`�F! I r a .Y f» i• p' S{�� .1•�+. i � � • sr4 t s.rr �f`��. * .'3~'`'' r fi��,., e' `�.r .'`tY+,:J'.,. �.. •?+''� :�, iv tr F _ N -4 3 UP r m o =S ; Q •tea= ='go3 $ gig = Sai =�Yag �gc�=3c a V = ==, ,a Q3 > meg ^ ��$� ..o CN w_-mac 8g i 1 c24 � S o is p A sa•� •n :8 , sxQoaa dCQ axit Fns �• _ _ 3 � aa �`'9 d 3 � = ai'� Q ^ o�az Z � ' S. ear � ?= � - o e• a aid• -Er Nm 00 S- i Ji.J g �' p a3 as o 0 3 � r�n � gt ' a a a a a a a D Sao � < ? .c ? •i ;' m � � . a g g >• 08 �0 m Z� a M -40 -4 <_ 8�8�a8 =QiB gs � 8 � sR ' '� ' 8 � z $ $so SaR$ s =3 e a g *.I ` Z D � M = o 3 8 ^ • a ?�19 S_ gS< ii9 an - r gs ?; • aia8CL w^3–�Y�i �_ece am •: z• �- g– j w gwc•v; � Sag cna = 4fix: i ! *=-a< = ? o ��)n• �Y • at qt _• 9 o . 0 -TD4 a 0 D 0 0 a_ C • s 8 +T t � O v . 12 0_ o o 'er• o a` sR3s � �a8 8`c frzS gg•-'--_ Za • �4E-11 fa do • $ $if _:aY • 3 =ov=a s a= �aa gf -gig 3s � �z ; 38v o - $�ag � g Y = 8 n` 8 :� 3__aa� g T$ agg_ ;�•� ig3 t a i i -• _ s 32 OU156 unconsolidated, clay-free sands caused by hydraulic pressure (from ground motion) forcing apart ground material particles and forcing them into liquid suspension. In the process, normally firm, but wet, ground materials are transformed into semi-liquid mixtures. The difference in states is comparable to the conversion of hard, wet beach sand into a soft plastic material of the consistency of wet concrete. Layers of ground material that are liquefied during an earthquake under- mine the support of both natural landforms and man-made structures. Bluffs and ridges of unconsolidated material may slump under their own weight. Buildings and structures may sink and lean. Often used photo- graphs taken after the 1964 Niigata, Japan earthquake show a group of multi-story apartment buildings leaning acutely or lying on their sides. These buildings remained intact, but this is not always the case when foundation support is diminished. Areas underlain by hard bedrock at shallow depth are seldom subject to liquefaction, so these can be eliminated from consideration when large areas are being evaluated on a generalized basis. In Contra Costa County, this is about half of its land area, but almost all of that is hilly topography. Areas with deep water tables and those underlain by well consolidated ground materials typically have low or moderate liquefaction potentials. The cities of western central, and northern Contra Costa County, as well as such of the agricultural land of eastern County, fall into these categories. However, geologically young and water saturated sandy sediments are highly susceptible to liquefaction, and extensive shoreline areas in western and northern County, and the Delta in eastern County, have these conditions. Landslides Landslides and ground slippages are another form of ground failure which may be precipitated by earthquakes. Areas that are subject to slides and slippages from other natural causes may be very hazardous under earthquake conditions. This is also to say that earthquake effects will be more exten- sive if the earthquake happens during the rainy season when ground conditions are more amenable to landsliding and ground slippage. Within Contra Costa County, the Briones Hills and Diablo Range are areas marked by a succession of large and small geologically recent slides, many of them highly unstable. On a Countywide basis the two most important factors influencing the performance of slopes are the nature of the bedrock or surficial deposits and the slope angle. However, there are a number of factors which have a profound effect on the stability of a particular hill- side. For example, the presence or absence of deep rooted vegetation; thickness and engineering characteristics of soils and underlying weathered, partially decomposed rock; orientation of bedding; or locally high rainfall can exert a controlling effect on the intensity of natural processess occur- ring on a particular hillside. 33 00157 7 4 Planning Implications The County General Plan and its component area plans should recognize local ground conditions as a primary determinant of land use. Within the areas of highest damage susceptibility land uses not involving sub- stantial human occupancy should be given a high priority. Whenever practical the General Plan should discourage urban or suburban develop- ment in areas underlain by geologic deposits which are susceptible to failure from severe shaking or underlain by deposits classified as having a high liquefaction potential, and on hillsides classified as possessing a high landslide susceptibility. To the extent practicable critical facilities, structures involving high occupancies and public facilities should not be sited in areas of highest damage susceptibility. Where it is deemed essential to do so for the public welfare, these structures should be sited, designed and constructed with due consideration for the potential for earthquake damage due to ground shaking, associated ground deformation, seismically-triggered flooding, liquefaction potential, and landslide susceptibility. In exercise of its responsibility to provide for the public safety in areas which are considered potentially hazardous in the event of an earthquake, approvals for public and private development projects should be contingent on geologic and engineering studies which define and delin- eate potentially hazardous geologic and/or soils conditions and recommend means of mitigating these adverse conditions. Contra Costa County, through its Planning Department should prepare an administrative map series delineating areas which may be hazardous during earthquakes. The proposed maps should be presented in the form of a Ground Response Nap (Seismic Susceptibility Map), Liquefaction Potential Nap, and Landslide Susceptibility Map. Preferably this mapping should be done on a Countywide basis and at a scale of 1 inch = 2000 feet. The U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle maps would map an ideal base of this information. FLOODING Flooding frequently accompanies an earthquake. It can be caused by fault rupture or by ground shaking, and through the collapse of dams and levees, the over-topping of empoundments, and tsunami ("tidal waves"). Levee Failure Levees are a form of dam, but a kind that keeps water out of a lower area instead of confined in a higher empoundment. Because both levees and dams hold water at elevations higher than adjoining ground, the failure of either results in flooding. Levee failure is common in some areas where levees rest on soft mud, silt, . or peat. Often, levees in these areas are built of the same weak materials s 34 41158 dt CLASS OF DELTA LEVEES = FIGURE 4 AND Of DELTA - XImw BOU :::.. APPRO - Ilo► `: . rupture or by i940 yyw1L »ucly acc Panies an the ove topping ofd steak 9. and th��Ruake. It can be �lPound�tss and tsunami the collapse of used by fault Levee Failure unami ("tidal waveserj s and levees, Levees are a instead of fO�° °f �, but hold water confined in a higher kind that keeps at elevations water out of a lower results rea in nations higher °�dment. flooding. adjoinin BeCause both levees and adam Levee failure i.s g ground, the failure ams or Peat, co °€ either Often, levees in soft areas where levees in these areas are built OftheOn mud, silt, weak materials • 34 0�i158 FIGURE 4 CLASSIFICATION OF DELTA LEVEES AND : ..::... APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF DELTA sow s'w► SsuR6 "TOCH � X.NSC' 1 .....-.. .. LEGEND ENGINEERED LEVEES (direct agreement levees) I NON-ENGINEERED LEVEES (non-project levees) -- APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY of the SAN JOAQUIN DELTA (Section 12220, California Water Code) FLOOD PLAIN (area below 10 feet in elevation) 35 i 00159 s dredged from adjoining waterways. In the Delta area of California, a region of diked islands, flooding has occurred every several years from non-earthquake causes. Its islands were drained in the Ninteenth Century to create high quality agricultural land. Since then, the peat laden soil of many of the islands has oxidized, resulting in subsidence of their floors and the reconstruction of higher and heavier levees. Concurrently, the region has become popular for recreation. Boat movement on the water- ways accelerates levee erosion, and increasing non-farm development worsens the disaster potential when levees fail. Part of the Delta lies in eastern Contra Costa County (technically, it is the area less than 10 feet above sea level), and it has demonstrated its vulnerability to flooding. Islands have flooded five times in the last 40 years. They have been reclaimed, except for Franks Tract State Park (a lake) and Big Break which are visible reminders that it is not always practical or economical to reclaim drowned islands. The threat of levee failure during periods of high water is constant. During the last such high water period in January 1973 (which was not the highest on record) levees on several islands were over-topped, or within a few inches of being over-topped, and "weeping" under the levees was discovered in at least one place. Delta levee standards do exist for federal project or maintenance levees, but they are only for flood control purposes. Even the 10-20% of the levees in Contra Costa County that are engineered and maintained according to federal standards are not specifically designed to withstand earthquake stresses. The remaining levees must be regarded as highly susceptible to earthquake stresses. Earthquake stresses in the Delta would be compounded by the nature of its fine-grained, water-saturated, unconsolidated ground materials. These effects have been discussed previously in this Element. Although the Delta historically has been one of the more seismically active areas of California and has experienced powerful earthquakes in the past, its levee system,has been subjected to only mild stresses since the late Nineteenth Century. (The forces of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the possible exception, appear to have been transmitted southward toward the lower San Francisco Bay area rather than eastward toward the Delta.) Dam Failure Dam failure is a matter of great concern, especially in settled areas, because the uncontrolled release of an empoundment can send a surge of water downstream at great force and speed, and inundate large areas. Dams are typically designed to withstand overload stresses (large ones are difficult to destroy even in wartime) but earthquakes are capable of exerting some of the most powerful forces in nature. Interestingly, a trickle of water from a small breach in a dam can erode the facility and grow to a rush of water to cause its failure. Fault movement or ground shaking could supply the breach. i. 00160 �'� a Nineteenth Century. (ine .oacejo ua. ua. z.--j possible exception, appear to have been transmitted southward toward the lower San Francisco Bay area rather than eastward toward the Delta.) Dam Failure Dam failure is a matter of great concern, especially in settled areas, because the uncontrolled release of an empoundment can send a surge of water downstream at great force and speed, and inundate large areas. Dams are typically designed to withstand overload stresses (large ones are difficult to destroy even in wartime) but earthquakes are capable of exerting some of the most powerful forces in nature. Interestingly, a trickle of water from a small breach in a dam can erode the facility and grow to a rush of water to cause its failure. Fault movement or ground shaking could supply the breach. 3 OU1f 4 r 1 t a 4 CO co 4} l Q x LU C14 a U s � S Z ti - 3 oO Q f o : nn1J1 U \ 4 +- r C cca t � 4 �- � J�� N�,i, . C N p C t� *s o � 0 CLS: s� Z. t 0 0J11161 TABLE 8 SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA S modest %,.I@ tkdei* CMr Year Dm Gee fig.1 Aaa MO (N.) tm%*4b.) Two Cefple4d Swear Ronrake brionet 01 67.300 273 2.100 Eesdr 1411 low Creek EMWD(owrwr)21,IN,3W Upw~beer Son Pablo Obis Son Pablo (2) 43.14] 170 1.250 ttyA—11, 192p See Few CMA 1111MUO(owwr)12,IN,4W Fitt 3 W.Rees HWAard Ferlt Loloyatw (3) 3.300 132 1.200 rw& 19D tdgMee CMA E&WO(a*~)36,IN,3W CMr slompbn 467 feat Antraek (41 722 30 450 Ewrdr 1435 Son JeaWin City of Aetkwb 4wmer) (rrr6rrery) 36,2N,IF Argyle a2 (S) 22 a 1175 one. t470 Sw Pablo Rey 10UO 6m wt)V.2N,4W C.L.Tilden (6) 243 a 35S 15016 1930 WIA&W CMA E.ti.Regional Pink Drente► PerL (canes)25.IN,4W Clifton Court (71 24,000 34 39.000 EM& 1910 Old swr Stag OW.Wow lisammoe rorebay ("rbuafy) 20.IS,4E Danville 1111 45 75 765 EWA 1461 Sas Roam Cask E110141025,IS,IW Door GeA (41 233 211 400 Erd1 1463 Dam God Centsc Corso County, FCWCO21,IN,IF Dry Creep 00) 362 30 410 EWA 1941 Dry Cad Centra Cara County,FCWCD (Wer of Piaraooed) krona)Cress okw.134 Rw► LaLe Orindo all no 45 360 fors 1935 Cascade CMA Orode CauMry Club(amwr) Crest o1w.535ft.34,tN,3W Lalond (121 60 41 so Emsk 1955 Loa Trarpaa CMA ERMl11)(0arwr133,1N,2W l CMr atewtioe 361 fee► Mallard (13) 3,113 30 11.000 tier& 1930 Sao"by CCCWO(orwws)13,20,2W (bits~) Maloney (14) 611 107 621) frisk 119/0 Fowls CMA EM1U0(oarwr)21,2N,4W (bilbtery) Man*Gael (131 4.415 34 1.510 Ens 11163 A1se6 CMA Correa Cora Cato y,FCWCD CMM of w.204f►,35,IN,2E M—W (16) 36 37 210 Easels 1%5 Las LwepasCMA E/6WD(amsew)10,2N,4W ("MW") North (17) 244 112 I'm Ewrgr 1961 IRweaw GeA E01111)(court)32,214,4W (trr6erary) CMM akrearoo 220 foe* Pine Creek (111) 225 a 330 Earle 136 pow CMA Centra Cab Conry,FCWCD (oaner)37,IN,1W Port Cera (19) 39 45 30 904 Im Cegrowr Streit WilKaw L.R(eb(sena) (trriu oy) CMM etov,105f►.3,2N,3W Son Pablo (201 17 42 6117 foes 1922 Coffee GeA EM111D(0,~)27,1 N,4W Cleammor CMM ek►wtion 242 fie► Sobrante 1211 25 211 1.002 Ead 19" Saw 8610 CMA EMWD OwAwr)3,IN,4W Cleorwmer (tr6rbry) Walnut Gaak Q2) 25 102 1110 Eatk 19167 Grays CMA E11M1D(orwr)21,IN,2W Cleo we r feri6reery) • 38 . . 0162 t. 11.p ''1 2t0 EMA Ina Son Pablo (20) C-VAet StroT, Cleoncter 17 (,ribp,,7) Wi!lTwn L.Rich(owns) 6V � 19j2 w Cnp e1ev,I05 h,3,2N,jW So6ronte (211CMTb Ciw,lr Cleo+wmer 25 28EU41)o(owner)27,1N, '.an EffAh 1 '—"--6—24?fee, � Walnut C'.4 SOA ftfil, CMAEdMtJD(ow,y,)3, 1 N,<w Clearwvter ?S 102 19il;T Etl*t!D(O nn)GMY""CMA 21,1N,2W 38 ��1s2 —"WM-)TF'IM, Fs . . ,. s . . ,.: i Several American disasters have been caused by dam failures, but none of these resulted from seismic causes. However, dams here have been so severely damaged during earthquakes that large populations were endangered. Somewhat larger or stronger earthquakes probably would have caused them to fail. In the most recent incident in California, the Van Korman Reservoir earth dam slumped badly during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. Over 50,000 people were evacuated from downstream areas until the reservoir could be lowered to a safe level.* From a regulatory standpoint, the event was disturbing because the dam had been thoroughly checked beforehand, yet it was dangerously damaged by a moderate strength earthquake that occurred several miles away. (A concrete dam closer to the epicenter was not seriously damaged.) The Van Norman Dam experience caused the state to require hydraulic fill dams to be reinspected and to require owners of all dams under the jurisdiction of the state to develop inundation maps. In Contra Costa County there are 22 major dams under the jurisdiction of the Division of Dam Safety of the California Department of Water Resources. None of them are astride known active fault traces but all can be expected to be subject to severe levels of ground shaking. Since all except one has been constructed since the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, they have never been subjected to seismic loading. From the standpoint of public safety, the Briones and Lafayette reservoir dams are the most critical rolled earth construction dams in the County and the San Pablo Reservoir Dam is the most critical (and only) hydraulic fill construction dam. These and other dams under public jurisdiction are being reinspected, and inundation maps are being prepared. A source of concern is that only the larger dams and reservoirs are publicly regulated. The regulation and supervision of smaller sized dams and reser- voirs is left open to local jurisdictions. Within the Bay Region only Marin and Sonoma counties are known to have adopted such ordinances. Within Contra Costa County the only agency with a general knowledge of the age, construction and history of small dams is the Soil Conservation Service. This federal agency will design and inspect the construction of dams for those owners who will cooperate with them. To promote such cooperation, *As this Element was being prepared for publication, a series of earthquakes in the Oroville, California area, in the minor to moderate range appear to have caused no damage to the earthen Oroville Reservoir Dam, the largest of its kind in California. Preliminary reports indicate that the earth- quake was generated by a fault which had not moved in 2 million years. 39 09163 r ]0 S 25 Y Ii .. 20 Gw.ow ati 0 is a €3 t0 x � s San hwidem (GAbs Gab) 0 w 1 2 S 10 20 30 too 200 300 1000 taorranm l.grrat, in Yam FIGURE 6a TSUNAMI RECURRENCE Frequency of occurrence for maximum hunami waves at the Presidio in San Francisco and at Crescent City. 0.1 itsd•5 ocpuuu►rtor, 0.5- 0.5 0.5 Ffodko of hwu d O heVo at Goldin Gab 5 0.5 1 _ FIGURE 6b TSUNAMI ATTENUATION Tsunami attenuation in San Francisco Bay based on the May 1960 and March 1964 tsunamis. Source: U.S. Geological Survey, Basic Data Contribution 52, 1972. 40 ., 09164 I Agr there are federal programs which will defray some construction costs, provided the dam is engineered to Soil Conservation Service standards. It should also be recognized that the Soil Conservation Service does not issue permits and a prospective dam builder is under no legal requirement to design or construct the dam to Soil Conservation Service standards. One small dam in the County has been overtopped at least once during the past 15 years. Water flowing over the crest has succeeded in cutting a prominent gully in the downstream face of the dam. This structure is probably weakened and in danger of being breeched if it is overtopped again. The seismic safety of these smaller dams is largely unknown. Tsunami Tsunamis are sea waves created by undersea fault movement. Traveling through the deep ocean, a tsunami is a broad and shallow, but fast moving, wave that poses little danger to most vessels. When it reaches the coast- line, however, the wave form pushes upward from the ocean bottom to make a high swell of water that breaks and washes inland with great force. The waves may reach SO feet in height on unprotected coasts, and one on record (Japan, 1896) killed nearly 30,000 people and destroyed over 100,000 homes. Several people were drowned in Crescent City, California, in 1964 by the tsunami generated by the Anchorage, Alaska, earthquake. Historic records of the Bay Area used by one study indicate that 19 tsunamis have been recorded in San Francisco Bay during the period 1868-1968. The maximum wave height recorded at the Golden Gate Tide gage was 7.4 feet, which may be regarded as a reasonable maximum for future events. The available data indicates a systematic diminishment of nave height from the Golden Gate to the head of the Carquinez Strait. Thus the damage poten- tial of a tsunami will tend to be greater in the Richmond area and show c general decrease toward the head of Carquinez Strait. Planning Implications Major dams are the most critical structures in Contra Costa County in terms of the potential loss of life that could result from their failure during an earthquake. After State safety studies and inundation studies have been completed consideration should be given to revising the County's General Plan and its land development ordinances to provide for use of downstream land appropriate to the findings. Unlike major dams, which are regulated by the State, small earthen dams are not now controlled. It is reasonable to expect extensive slumping, cracking, fissuring, and fragmentation of embankments in a number of these largely non- engineered installations under earthquake conditions. The County should adopt an ordinance regulating the design and construction of dams not under the control of the State. New small dam locations would be better reviewed under land use permit procedures, and existing small dams up-stream from proposed . development projects should be given consideration in environmental impact reports and other project reviews. 41 0016 Delta levees are the most sensitive potential flooding from eartstructures in the County quakes. Until recently, little antenterms of Ma.JU& ua ; of the potential loss of life that coula ,.... ` ` have earthge• After State safety studies o andinundation Coty'ssGeneral ePlan an downstream land completed consideration should be given Pro for use of and its land tdeveloo the f ent ordinances to p appropriate which are regulated by the State, small earthen dams are Unlike major dams, expect extensive slumping, cracking, these non- not now controlled. It is reasonable to should adopt fissuring, and fragmentation of emban uonditions. The untylsho largely engineered installations under earthquake and construction of dams not under the an ordinance regulating the design reviewed control of the State. New small dam locations would bes ream from proposed er land use permit procedures, and existing small dams up- ects should be given consideration in environmental impact development project Project reviews. reports and other prof 41 _ 001673 Delta levees are the most sensitive structures in the County in terms of potential flooding from earthquakes. Until recently, little attention was given to earthquake stresses in evaluating the safety of projects, but this is a subject which warrants enacting study. For projects proposing uses other than agriculture and open space, thorough soils and geologic reports should be required in the review process; these should assess the stability and dynamic response of the levees, the underlying soils, and the consequence of failure. Lacking such information, agricultural and other land uses not involving substantial human occupancy is appropriate for areas subject to inundation from levee failure. In areas where mapping indicates that a tsunami hazard may exist, project reviews should address the adequacy of protection for structures for human occupancy, and particularly critical structures, and potentially dangerous commercial or industrial facilities (e.g., plants for the manufacture or storage of explosive, flammable or toxic materials 5 ' 42 0015-S r HAZARDOUS STRUC1 MS AND PHYSICAL FACILITIES • 0010.4 1 INTRODUCTION The preceding discussion up to now has dealt with seismicity and'-seismic ti rn i 0016'7 INTRODUCTION The preceding discussion up to now has dealt with seismicity and seismic geology in order to explain the causes and effects of earthquakes, and to explain Khat these mean to Contra Costa County. It has been shown that Contra Costa County is a seismically active area where human settlements and buildings are expected to endure major earthquakes during their use- ful lives. These earthquake impacts, it was noted, will vary with the quality of the soil and bedrock underneath the developments and buildings. Now, this part of the plan will focus on the public policy considerations for constructing individual buildings to withstand earthquakes, and in locating important facilities serving the public on this dynamic landscape. SEISMIC RISK Before taking up the subject of structural safety, it is necessary to dis- cuss seismic risk because the measures taken to make structures safe during earthquakes depend on the extent of the danger that structures are exposed to as well as the public's willingness to take risks. A public jurisdiction adopting policies for the location of land uses and public service facilities (such as in its General Plan), or enacting build- ing standards (such as in its building code), is exercising its judgment on the degree of seismic risk that it will accept. (Too often, this life- and-death judgment is not publicly evaluated and explicitly set forth but is implicit in the various criteria and standards it uses in its decision- making process.) As desirable as it would be to completely eliminate seismic risks to both people and property, society simply doesn't have the resources and, possibly not even all the required technology to accomplish this, or even to approx- imate it, in the foreseeable future. The near total elimination of eartEt- quake risk would require that new structures be over-built as far as other purposes are concerned, and that virtually all existing structures would be reinforced, rebuilt, or removed.* If the total elimination of risk from seismic causes is not possible at the present time, then it would be desirable for the purposes of objective se- lection to have the capability to "price" the costs and benefits of alter- native seismic safety plans and programs (or safety standards) in terms of their comparative abilities to save lives and protect persons and property. However, this kind of cost-benefit quantification also is not yet possible (for many reasons) so the determination of acceptable risk and the selection of acceptable seismic safety programs must be made qualitatively. *As was pointed out in the preceding section, the basic information to iden- tify which existing buildings would need particular modifications to achieve a specified level of seismic safety is generally lacking at the present time. So, it is not possible with current means to say how big of a pro- ject it should be to achieve absolute seismic safety, or what this aspect alone of risk analysis would cost. °' 60168 �a This Seismic Safety Element already has stated general priorities in its Goals statement, where it give precedence to the protection of human lives over the protection of real estate and property, and states that the reduction of damage to property must be balanced against financial capability, the quality of life, and environmental quality. In other words, it advocates an approach to seismic safety in which risk to lives should not be considered to be acceptable, but buildings and other pro- perty may be expendable. The policies and recommendations of this Seismic Safety Element, indivi- dually and in combination, are intended to further these goals; but, it is obvious that since several recommendations point to the need for spe- cific studies, the goals are not going to be accomplished in the near future, or with present means. Rather, it is expected that the implemen- tation of the Element and other public programs will result in a continuing reduction of risk to persons and then to property. With particular reference to the structural aspects of seismic safety, the California Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety advocated an approach that Contra Costa County should follow (see Table 9) . The Com- mittee recommended that additional building (or project) costs were warranted to achieve desired levels of safety in primarily new structures. Four levels of acceptable risk were identified, each justifying a different level of expenditure. For these kinds of structures which must function after an earthquake or whose failure could result in catastrophe, the Committee recommended sim- ply that safety had to be achieved at any cost. Increases in project cost in the range of 5 to 25 percent were thought to be reasonable for other kinds of emergency facilities, and between S and 15 percent for high occupancy structures. At the lower end of the scale, very minor increases in the range of 1-2 percent in most cases were considered to be adequate and reasonable for most residential and other structures. The County should regard these cost ranges as reasonable parameters in determining costs for its own projects and in setting standards for pri- vate construction. STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IN EARTHQUAKES (SAN FERNANDO EXAMPLE) In an earthquake, the major loss of life and destruction to property occurs as a result of damage to buildings. For example, during the moderate 1971 San Fernando earthquake, which centered in a suburban area of relatively modern buildings, damage to structures alone exceeded $500 million and there were 58 deaths. The damage to the buildings may be summarized as follows: 1. Family dwellings. Frame dwellings withstood earthquake forces quite well. In the area of strong ground shaking, 15,000 dwellings were damaged to varying degrees; of these 465 were declared unsafe and . + t 44 00169 :...,, ..7T. �l y- % r i tt E� S i rt i 00 S� R Y� trb '� fl v rs.,.r✓y` �'"S y i}:j%s/%� !+1e�A J `fir fl V �¢ iR G+i i+'� _�r•r A Jts J t%'� i ✓ '� U✓ „y i 's i i i � fl r i '3 r v Qi JY T 'li r r''G G iG'v J�CFi� '� fr v�'+ V O V A ✓ A �wv fli ""' iy� ice.. ' v jet. fY A e? M.+.+. M V •U .►� i T.-".' OS- AV.0 is p�'y"7 �,:i tJ' : i fl "�ii'ry iR r r.ry .�r M i p ii , vy �► p r Ar i t7 r i s+.i Lt+ P, "•i i y i v r .t+' O✓'S '�`i iI A G i�.�s Z i 4�,•ri w i A vii fl '� flu" fl9vA u, ? �� ��? '" rite 415 61 MU U d r 'A V r'� .�►!" i 9 ,'y r '+ ' i Arr. G $ i Z •�' Jr, G.r+4i 0 VIVO,$UJ ✓O 9 v R! C r „yw7v e n iG'' iOr!rJ *�fl""iiO — " fi�p 9 t�Mi • .r.r dM 7U OOCro M, T " r O G' v y"i dy v i O„A U v M J T+7 7,o v A w r i �i q ''..✓ s't v p+ :.„ �, • ""' 'C7"•• t to r .� G�v "✓¢ O np".. i i".v G + ��`r f'a v " y •" Q. O u Z. ,, %c r% p • 7 O + r G r JG r 7 .r� �Cr7 s-�' �A„ p ¢i,,, 3 +.r�..^' C."!i�� � w i '' A r fl U U r i t v+Lw'�^,v�•7 ,,,. v Y i. 's f 'YW,S .�. G .. .► U TrV ✓fl r fi $"� �+ r,y v✓ v �►... y4 av V V fl A T r O r G �+ flv'fl¢e�O A n ✓ t' 160 %ass, i G'rt i 1A ya ti d O r 1 ry+0 f+ ♦p To A tA./ ^S 7 i C i O v iii► .�w''7G��A r fl'�J ✓ � � �A A ✓� t�Y 4 fl VQ jr?. i •i v L•ri, � 'fi„C v L ...,?...?� L3� w. sAi ti i U ai yj'"r9 M��j'O yA1►f^'� Y r C y�'>rG � G i► - 0 J L� A .i3.�G �► C?+% i G Y A S t/3 „" `•+'w r D/iia�,. r 7 3 w G w .'7 U �v fl" �G � � 9 � v r.►;% s z•��C • `` �� wTw, 4J�� 9 vim+wry ;i k",r v Ol y N 4 �� 45 Chimneys and other inflexible building elements tended to be damaged. Wide spans in garages and elsewhere were susceptible to failure. Fix- tures, such as water heaters, were toppled or damaged even when the buildings housing them were little affected. 2. Apartments and Commercial Buildings. A total of 62 apartment houses and 372 commercial structures were so severely damaged that they had to be declared unsafe and evacuated. Occupants of residential buildings had to be provided with emergency housing. Damage to commercial buildings slowed economic recovery. 3. Old, Masonry Buildings. Old reinforced brick buildings were heavily damaged, not only in the area of strong ground shaking, but as far away as downtown Los Angeles (15 to 25 miles from the source of the earthquake waves) . 4. High-Rise Buildings. Modern high-rise buildings received only a partial test, since they were not located in the epicentral area. Those buildings in the Los Angeles area, 10 to 25 miles from the center of the earthquake did not sustain structural damage. This earthquake did trigger a considerable amount of non-structural damage, including cracking of interior partitions, breakage of win- dows, falling of ceilings and light fixtures, overturning of office furniture; and failure of elevators, air conditioning equipment and emergency power supplies. The San Fernando earthquake can serve as a model of earthquake effects on • structures for Contra Costa County, which is also extensively developed in modern, suburban density, low-rise buildings, but has some older struc- tures and is beginning to experience higher density development and higher buildings. It shows that most modern buildings, especially frame structures, will survive at least a moderate earthquake and protect their occupants. But, it also shows that greater attention must be given to both geologic conditions and construction standards in new building projects, and to the performance of older buildings which were designed before Riley Act (1933) standards influenced building codes. STRUCTURAL SAFETY PROGRU1 COMPONENTS Seismic Design Provisions of the Uniform Building Code The present seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Code, which is followed by Contra Costa County, are based on professional association recommendations promulgated by California structural engineers in 1967. Recognizing the need to improve the code (as a result of knowledge gained from studies of recent earthquakes and other research), and acknowledging that the task of revision is greater than voluntary associations can 46 r 00171 c Safety the Legislature's Joint Committee nil dating study reasonably PrOV1de• ismic t the State of CaliforniaCl ifoh��g�hec�nimum Until such has recommended tha strengthening the basis Of codes with the State. that could serve asrevised, it would appear design requirements ,of all buildingsively ��nrin� interim Seismic Design provisions of the Uniform Building The present seismic design Code is followed by. Contra CostaP'r° sions of the Uniform reCp�ndations promulgated bounty, are bas Build' Recognizing Y n Professionalg Code, which from studies S the need to improve the cod Californiaa structural engineersssociation thst of recent eaz' Quakes (as a res n 1967. the task of revision t and other research),uknowledge gained greater than d ac voluntary associat onsocan dging 46 J 00171 } reasonably provide, the Legislature's Joint Committee on Seimi sc Safety has recommended that the State of California finance an updating study that could serve as the basis of strengthening the minimum seismic design requirements of all building codes with the State. Until such time as the standards are comprehensively revised, it mould appear appropriate for local units of government to consider adopting interim standards which would provide for a higher level of public safety. Six areas of concern were identified by the Joint Committee on Seismic Safety:* _ 1. Regulation of design and anchorage of non-structural building items such as: exterior architectural material and veneers, pre-cast pre- fabricated panels, elevator equipment, light fixtures, mechanical equipment, ceiling systems, electric power equipment, non-bearing partitions, interior finish materials, glazing, and shelving, cabinets, racks, containers related to storage facilities. 2. Augmentation of (seismic) lateral design forces and provision for vertical acceleration design forces. 3. Consideration of the influence of the type and depth of soils at the building site on the dynamic behavior of building structures. 4. Improvement of criteria for seismic connection details building joints, and pre-fabricated building system interface. S. Codification of stricter requirements to insure the unimpaired function and structural integrity of emergency exits and stairways. 6. Enactment of separate code requirements to deal with higher standards for emergency service facilities. In view of the known deficiencies in the Uniform Building Code as well as the success which several jurisdictions have had with special codes, it is suggested that the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Department review the adequacy of existing codes and development regulations. M1here warranted by existing information, the Building Inspection Department should recommend appro- priate changes in County Ordinances to the Board of Supervisors. Structural Hazards Study The major technical impediment to the development of programs to correct hazardous structural conditions is the unavailability of comprehensive and systematic inventory information. Conventional sources of generalized structural information, such as the Federal Census of Housing and Land Use Inventories for the general plan, are not adequate to make even large- *Meeting the Earthquake Challenge, 1974 (p. 91) . 47 t�1'72 a' area policy planning assessments of where problem structures are located, what their problems are, and how many structures are involved. Similarily, • normal sources of information on individual structures are inadequate to provide (recently at least) the kinds of information needed for implemen- tation and enforcement programs. In both cases, special inventories and specialized reviews of existing data sources are necessary to prepare seismic safety programs dealing with structures. Because the vast majority of local jurisdictions do not have a positive program to identify existing hazardous buildings and have not formulated plans and regulations for the abatement of hazards found unacceptably high, the Joint Committee on Seismic Safety recommended that action be taken at the State level. Their report (Meeting the Earthquake Challenge, 1974, p. 18) recommends the creation of a California Commission of Seis- mic Safety. As proposed, one of the functions of this commission would be to develop a program of hazardous-building abatement, concentrating first on older structures and critical structures which are hazardous because of local geologic-seismic conditions on the site. If the state does not prescribe a program to study hazardous structures within two years of the County's adoption of the Seismic Safety Element, the County Planning Department should draft a work program to conduct its own study. Such a program would pertain to the unincorporated areas of the County and to those cities wishing to participate. It could be modeled after the recommendations of the report prepared by the Advisory Group on Government Organization and Performance (Meeting the Earthquake Challenge, 1974, p. 166-167) . Briefly, the first phase of their pro- gram calls for making an inventory of high-occupancy, critical and older structures, and outlines a strategy for the elimination of buildings found to be hazardous either because they possess serious structural de- ficiencies or because of geologic-seismic conditions on the site. In the second phase of the program, less hazardous buildings are identified or estimates made of their prevalence, location, and degree of hazard posed. Using this data, a program could be developed to reduce seismic risk in realistic stages over a period of years. RECONSTRUCTION! AND REDEVEWPMENT PW%NING Another lesson that was dramatically brought home to the public by the 1971 San Fernando earthquake was the need to take seismic considerations into account during land use planning. It has become apparent that a strictly engineering approach to earthquake hazards was insufficient to ensure the structural integrity of buildings or the safety of occupants. This led to the enactment of legislation requiring seismic safety ele- ments, which provides for identification of hazardous areas and enact- ment of a system of policies and procedures to utilize this knowledge in the planning process. However, it should be recognized that the next severe Bay Area earthquake will provide engineers, geologists and seis- mologists with a vast amount of information of the performance of struc- ture and various types of ground throughout the County. This geotechnical information should be used to guide reconstruction and redevelopment plans. (History offers numerous examples of communities that failed to . ' 48 0t�1'73 p redesign or change land uses in heavily-damaged areas because they did not have the plans and programs to carry out such redevelopment soon enough after a disaster.) The Post-Earthquake Recovery and Redevelopment Advisory Group to the • Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety has made a series of recommendations which suggest control mechanisms that can be instituted prior to an earthquake, and which will go into effect automatically in the post-earthquake period to provide a framework for reconstruction and redevelopment. The objectives of these recommendations are to minimize recovery problems and maximize the degree of seismic safety afforded to future generations inhabiting the striken area. This panel of experts has recommended that counties and cities provide for post-disaster con- ditions in their General Plans, point out that at present General Plans do not provide for changes in circumstances that would follow a sub- stantial disaster. When compared with older established communities, Contra Costa County has relatively few areas in need of redevelopment or where existing land use would be considered obsolete. The majority of existing structures, particularly in the unincorporated areas, are family dwellings of frame construction that are generally able to withstand strong ground shaking without sustaining structural damage. Moreover, most apartments, public buildings and commercial buildings are modern structures which have had the benefit of the seismic design standards of the Uniform Building Code. However, there is an obvious need to ensure that proper consideration be given to changes in land use in areas which are heavily damaged by future earthquakes. Within the existing procedural framework, the appropriateness of existing land use is periodically reviewed and updated. Generally these revisions of the General Plan are not made on a Countywide basis. Rather, they take the form of General Plan updates on a planning area or "community" basis. It is therefore strongly recommended that these per- iodic reviews take into account new scientific and engineering knowledge, particularly the localized information obtained from geologic and soils studies for projects proposed in the area. Further, the plan- ning staff should develop contingency procedures for immediate up- dating of the General Plan in areas which are heavily damaged by a severe earthquake. Additionally, it is suggested that contingency redevelopment be considered in preparing or updating area plans. 49 W174 e ---------------- COWii11TITY FACILITIES AND SEISMIC SAFETY Emergency Response Facilities Certain public and institutional services are needed immediately following an earthquake to aid the injured, prevent additional casualties, and pro- tect property. These services are rendered through facilities that are termed "critical" or "essential" for seismic safety planning. These include major medical facilities (hospitals), police and fire stations, and emergency service headquarters and communications installations. If local emergency plans are to be put into effect, it is imperative that these facilities survive the earthquake and remain operative in the aftermath. The experience elsewhere with critical facilities' performances during earth- quakes has not been satisfactory. In the moderate 1971 San Fernando earth- quake, for example, three hospitals near the epicenter were extensively - damaged, garages collapsed on emergency vehicles, and emergency communica- tions systems were put out of operation. Their failures had to be compen- sated by essential services from outside facilities. Most of the damaged facility structures were built under modern building code standards. As a result of the San Fernando earthquake, hospitals were added to the facili- ties whose building plans receive state review, but these procedures will benefit only new construction. Initial reconnaissance surveys in Contra Costa County (see Technical Back- ground Report) indicate that some critical facilities are in older buildings, • some are located very near the suspected locations of faults, and still others continue to be built without special construction and without geo- logic reports. The County's Emergency Operations Center is housed in a hollow concrete block structure which meets only the minimum seismic design standards of the Uniform Building Code and, at least, its remote communi- cations installations appear to be very susceptible to earthquake damage. Other Community Facilities Of the range of public and semi-public facilities (over 2,000 individual facilities were inventoried in Contra Costa County), the kinds beyond those discussed above have special earthquake significance: schools, public administration centers, and places of public assembly. Schools have received the most public attention in the state since the Field Act was passed following the tragic collapse of an elementary school during the 1930 Long Beach earthquake. The 1933 Field Act required local school plans to be reviewed by the state. And, it required existing buil- dings to be brought up to standard or discontinued--something only now oc- curring in many communities. Unfortunately, the Field Act has not applied to all educational facilities (colleges, universities, and private schools are exempt), and it has evolved without its later provisions being made retroactive. School sites, as well as buildings, have been reviewed only since 1967, so some "safe" buildings may be located on earthquake faults or seismically poor ground. Nevertheless, although no post-1933 schools have been subjected to a major earthquake, none have been dangerously dam- aged by lesser earthquakes since the Field Act was passed. ' so Aa s, Schools are often used for emergency operations centers during the post- earthquake and recovery periods. Public administrative centers, such as city halls and county buildings, are also needed for disaster operations and recovery work. Places of public assembly, ranging from churches to auditoriums and stadiums, may subject large numbers of people to danger in the event of building fail- ure during earthquakes. Yet, no special seismic consideration is routinely given to these facilities in their location, design, and construction. Utility Facilities Any prolonged disruption of utility service is dangerous to an urbanized society and its economy, but utilities (like transportation facilities) are highly vulnerable to earthquake damage. Underground components of utility systems are often extensively damaged during substantial earthquakes. Pipelines for water, sewer service and gas; and even for electrical service and communications can be shattered in places. Damage to the water supply system is the most imminently ser- ious because potable water is the commodity human beings need most regu- larly and because water is needed for fighting fires. Fire was responsible for much of the destruction of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake; fire that was able to burn unchecked for days because the City's broken mains could not bring water to its fire crews. Service can be restored in a matter of days or weeks by temporary installations but it may be many months before regular pipelines are repaired. Parts of Anchorage, Alaska, were stili served by temporary above-ground lines more than a year after. the 1964 Good Friday earthquake. Above-ground transmission and distribution systems are also susceptible to earthquake damage, but they are usually easier and less expensive to restore than the underground installations. Utility plants and stations are also subject to earthquake damage. One of the most severely damaged facilities in the 1971 San Fernando earth- quake was the $100 million Sylmar Converter Station, an electric system installation of regional importance. The experience of other areas with utility installations during substan- tial earthquakes would doubtlessly have a counterpart in Contra Costa County. A review of the distribution of utility stations and lines rela- tive to geologically hazardous features in the County shows that many cross faults, marshlands, and other areas that may be hazardous during earthquakes. 51 0t�1�`7a Transportation Facilities Transportation facilities, especially the roads and streets of the arterial network are "critical" or "essential" facilities for responding to the effects of a substantial earthquake because they are necessary for the movement of emergency vehicles supplies, and evacuation transport. Later, they are necessary to accomplish reconstruction and restoration of the local economy. Airports, in enabling damage assessment reconnaissance flights to take place immediately after a disaster, and afterwards to accommodate the evacuation of casualties and supplies, are also initially important. Later, the full range of transportation facilities, including railroads, ports, and public transportation systems have roles to play in the recovery process. Transportation systems are vulnerable to earthquakes. Roads and streets are easily blocked, and often buckled and broken, but emergency routes are readily improvised in time. The interchanges of freeways and similar installations (bridges and overpasses, for example) are often damaged but not readily restored. In the moderate 1971 San Fernando earthquake, 42 bridge structures (mainly interchanges) were damaged and 5 collapsed. Rail- road tracks are often so badly warped that they must be rebuilt. Even air- ports are susceptible to great damage; the control tower at the Anchorage, Alaska, International Airport fell during the 1964 earthquake there. A major earthquake impacting Contra Costa County would be expected to cause widespread destruction to its transportation systems. The linear elements of these systems--roads, railroad tracks, and BART tracks--necessarily cross various earthquake faults as well as areas susceptible to ground failure. Landsliding from non-earthquake causes is a recurring problem that would be intensified by ground shaking. On the subject of ground failure, seven of the 12 freeway interchanges in the County are located in areas where a high liquefaction potential is suspected. Additionally, even freeway overpass structures sited on firm ground are susceptible to collapse from strong ground shaking. In some portions of the State, the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) has conducted special studies of existing freeway overpass structures and reinforced those which were found to be potentially hazardous under earthquake conditions. CALTRANS has not initiated such a study in this County and none is planned in the foreseeable future. Some major highways and roads in the County could easily be closed, even to emergency vehicles, in the aftermath of a severe earthquake. Accord- ing to CALTRANS, even if considerable damage is sustained to freeway structures, traffic can be restored on most highways (at least on a tem- porary basis) within hours or days. Obviously, the time required to make emergency repairs and/or reroute traffic will in part be a function of the areal extent of the impacted area. A great earthquake, such as the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, is capable of damaging roads through- out the Bay Region. It is probable that such an event would tax the earthquake response capabilities of all road agencies. The reconstruc- tion of severely damaged overpasses would require weeks or months to complete. . 52 00177 —m7 Critical Industrial Facilities There is great concern in seismic safety planning that an earthquake could trigger an industrial disaster. Up to now, earthquakes have caused some serious industrial installation failures, such as the rupturing of oil storage tanks in Alaska in the 1964 Anchorage earthquake, but these fail- ures have not evolved into disasters. This history is fortunate but not particularly reassuring because lesser forces than earthquakes have trig- gered industrial-caused disasters. One famous incident, the explosion of military ordinance in 1944, occurred in Port Chicago in Contra Costa County. The industrial earthquake hazard includes the storage of potentially dan- gerous materials, disruption of critical industrial processes, and accidents involving potentially dangerous materials being loaded or trans- ported. The disaster potential from industrial causes irrespective of earthquakes is of particular concern to Contra Costa County because of the nature of many of its industries and because of its location in a region of high seismicity. The presence of petroleum and chemical industries, the "port" role in trans-shipping petroleum products and military explosives, and the presence of a major military explosives depot here, result in large quantities of potentially explosive, flammable, and poisonous materials being stored, processed, and transported in the County. The mere presence of these materials and their processing locally does not automatically mean that an industrial (or military) disaster would result from a significant earthquake. Precautions being taken by industry and the military to avoid accidents and disasters are substan- tial and generally effective. The cause of concern regarding critical industrial facilities is that the seismic safety consideration given to the location of plants and storage areas and to the design and construction of industrial struc- tures here is not up to date. Much new information on the nature of earthquakes and the design of structures--and this has been learned in the last two decades--is only now being applied to building codes and practices. As a result, the existing installations need to be evaluated in the light of current knowledge just as dams are being re- viewed as a result of the very unsatisfactory performance of the lower Van Norman Reservoir Dam during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake. This kind of information is needed to assess the situation in Contra Costa County and it is not generally available. SUMMARY The purpose of the preceding discussion has been to make observations and preliminary estimates of the prevalence, location and degree of hazard posed by certain types of existing structures. And, it is intended to indicate the scope, direction and magnitude of work to be done subsequently to review individual facilities. It is apparent that 53 001'78 �3 is i thehighestpriority should be given to (a) critical structures (includ- ing industrial facilities and high occupation buildings) that are sited • in hazardous fault zones, in areas subject to seismically-triggered flooding, and in marshland areas; (b) building types that are known to be hazardous ("Type III" construction, with unreinforced masonry walls using lime mortar and wood floors and roof); (c) older structures which have not had the benefit of seismic design provisions of the Uniform Building Code (the Riley Act was adopted by the California legislature after the Long Beach earthquake of 1933). _ t z f 'b S4 01 179 or INPLEMENTATION • 001(j!1 PURPOSE The Seismic Safety Element, like any general plan element, is to include a program for the implementation of its policies and recommendations. (In fact, a plan element should be prepared with its ultimate means of implementation in mind.) A general plan implementation program is char- acteristically generalized and is meant to guide to the preparation of more specific and shorter-term programs, including departmental work priorities, the administration of laws, the provision of services, and the review of proposed structures or improvements. These implementation recommendations are divided between two subject areas. The first is concerned with those aspects of Seismic Safety Element imple- mentation that can be provided through the planning agency; the second, with programs of other agencies and jurisdictions that are pertinent to Contra Costa County's implementation efforts. GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIPS The addition of a Seismic Safety Element to a city or county general plan does not "take care of the subject". Instead, its adoption starts a pro- cess of adjusting the other plan elements to the findings and policies of the new element. Specialized elements such as this or the Noise or Safety Elements tend to be more important in influencing the more basic elements such as Land Use, Circulation, or Community Facilities/Utilities than in being used independently. Further, the status of this Seismic Safety Element that of an "initial" plan component which is intended to be filled out to a full or "final" version after a period of experience administering this first version and after additional information has been obtained. In the following text, recommendations are made for, first, the adoption of the initial Seismic Safety Element; second, for the process and infor- mation needs of a full Seismic Safety Element; and, third, for the relation- ships between the other general plan elements and the Seismic Safety Ele- ment. Adoption of the Initial Seismic Safety Element The following steps were recommended in the Technical Background Report: 1. The Technical Background Report should be finalized and published as a staff document. 2. An initial Seismic Safety Element should be prepared and published, and taken to public hearing as an amendment (addition) to the County General Plan. This Element should rely heavily on the findings, policies, and recommendations of the Technical Background Report (which should be considered as a supplement to the Element). SS X181 The Technical Background Report has been published and this initial Seismic Safety Element has been (prepared, adopted). nPveloniment of a Final Seismic Safety Element w16. Adoption of the Initial Seismic Safety Element The following steps were recommended in the Technical Background Report: 1. The Technical Background Report should be finalized and published as a staff document. 2. An initial Seismic Safety Element should be prepared and published, and taken to public hearing as an amendment (addition) to the County General Plan. This Element should rely heavily on the findings, Policies, and recommendations of the Technical Background Report ® (which should be considered as a supplement to the Element). j SS tH�181 The Technical Background Report has been published and this initial Seismic Safety Element has been (prepared, adopted). Development of a Final Seismic SaTety Element The initial Seismic Safety Element (with its Technical Background Report) is much closer to a "final"' product than was first expected. Because of the extent of the work that has been done, follow-up work can proceed grad- ually for the next few years and concentrate on: 1. Producing and updating the implementation items identified herein. 2. Assimilating into the implementation process the information antici- pated from other programs (e.g., inundation maps prepared by dam owners pursuant to S.B. 896). 3. Producing the specific subject studies identified in this report (e.g., slope stability map series). The results of these, where appropriate, can be added to the Seismic Safety Element through selective amendments. Later the Seismic Safety Element itself can be comprehensively updated. The process of updating and improving the Seismic Safety Element should utilize the County's "area" plan program as a vehicle. It has been a prac- tice of the County to adopt a new subject element of the County General Plan on a countywide basis and then to update and detail the element in the course of updating and detailing its "area" plans. These plans are comprehensive (multiple element) efforts performed on an area basis and typically carried out with the participation of a local citizens' committee. With the advent of new state legislation, such as that requiring consistency between a government's general plan and its development ordinances, tie County has initiated a program of area plan reviews that emphasize large planning areas to achieve frequent updatings, and which deal with both planning for the future development of unincorporated communities and the coordination of city-county planning efforts. Information Required for "Final" Seismic Safety Element This Plan has identified the kinds of information that are still needed in order to provide a full range of information for a "final" Seismic Safety Element. In summary, this information includes: 1. Detailed Geologic Information (and Administrative Map) . 2. Administration Map Information. Fault flap, Ground Response Map, Liquefaction Map, Lanslide Potential Map, Flooding Map (in connection with the Safety Element). s S6 oin 0.4 3. Structural Study. the County's structures study quantifying rquantifying and locating the inventory of construction and seismic stress.to structural soundness (by use and are Information Required for "Final" Seismic Safety clement ll an has identified the kinds of information forhat"finaltiSei mic needed This P1 a of information in order to providIn e a full rang shy' this information includes: Safety Element- 1. Detailed Geologic Information (and Administrative Map) . Information. Fault Map, Ground Response Map, 2. Administration Map Flooding Map (in connection Liquefaction Map, Lan slide Potential Map, With the Safety Element). 56 Oi 3. Structural Study. A study quantifying and locating the inventory of the County's structures relative to structural soundness (by use and construction) and seismic stress. 4. Information from studies expected to be performed by other agencies (e.g., highway interchange analyses) . Input to Other General Plan Elements To a great extent, then, the Seismic Safety Element will be both implemented and updated through other parts and preparation programs of the County Gen- eral Plan. Following are some of the ways the Seismic Safety Element should influence other state mandated general plan elements:* 1. Land Use Element. Most Seismic Safety Element recommendations either will not seriously affect the kinds of land uses or the densities of land use provided for in the General Plan (for example, performance standards for structures do not usually affect land use) or will func- tion to provide detailing to development proposals of a scale that typically will not be discernable at the general plan level (such as not building on fault traces). However, certain large areas may be identified in the Seismic Safety Element which are, for example, sub- ject to flooding, excessive shaking, or serious ground failure and, therefore, should be designated for open space or very low occupancy uses. In some other areas the nature of seismic hazards might only restrict the location of high occupancy structures or critical facil- ities. 2. Circulation Element. Most streets and other components of a transpor- tation network follow land use decisions, so wise land use decisions will preclude most poor circulation decisions from a seismic safety standpoint. Nevertheless, direct attention must be given to the se=s- mic stress performance of existing and future transportation structures and to their locations relative to seismic features (e.g., faults). In some cases, streets may be among the preferred alternative uses to .be placed over inactive faults. 3. Housing Element. For the most part, the locational concerns of this element can be addressed in the Land Use Element. However, seismic safety considerations may affect the long range utility of a portion of the existing housing stock (i.e., its structural soundness), may accelerate the redevelopment of housing areas, and affect the cost of new housing. Seismic Safety may have unequal impacts on the housing supplies of different social and economic groups because older, non- suburban buildings are more likely to be deficient. *The necessary generalness o these statements should not be interpreted �as conflicting with more specific statements made elsewhere in this report. S7 ' �83 �a NOW-;. 4. Open Space Elements. Seismic Safety considerations which indicate that . large areas should not be developed or accorded low development prior- ities affect both the Open Space and Land Use Elements. The open space potentials of localized seismic features, such as fault zones, may be mapped or covered by policy statements in the general plan, and guide the implementation process during project reviews or ordinance adminis- tration activities. S. Conservation Element. A finding that a large area is seismically hazardous may be used in conjunction with conservation information to recommend the area for future resource protection usage (e.g., agri- culture or watershed) . 6. Safety Element. There is a subject overlap between the two elements with respect to those geologic hazards that are not entirely seismic in character but seismically induced, as well as precipitated by other causes (e.g. , flooding, landslides). 7 Scenic Highways and Noise Elements. The recommendations of these elements have no direct relationships with seismic safety, but these may be affected by considerations already introduced in other elements. In addition to the general plan elements mandated by the California Planning Law, there are other elements which may be utilized locally and which are significant in implementing the Seismic Safety Element; these include: 1. Redevelopment Element. Seismic conditions may indicate that certain areas are hazardous enough to warrant redevelopment, or that other areas may warrant changes of land use in the event they are substan- tially damaged by earthquakes (history indicates that the latter areas will be rebuilt as before unless redevelopment plans and programs are available) . A Redevelopment Element, or equivalent recommendations in other parts of the general plan would provide an appropriate policy instrument to incorporate this kind of seismic safety information in the general plan. Unless or until Contra Costa County prepares a Re- development Element, this subject matter should be addressed in future "area" plan revisions. 2. Community Facilities/Utilities Element(s). Although the subject matter here is largely required by California Planning Law in connection with other elements, it is so basic to general plans that many cities and counties publish separate elements. Seismic safety information can be used in the preparation of this subject matter to indicate areas where certain facilities should not be built or where special design criteria need apply, or which existing facilities need to be phased out or rebuilt. Contra Costa County is preparing Community Facilities and Utilities elements in conjunction with its "area" plans, and the material developed by the Technical Background Report can be utilized therein. s8 0 184 Y m� 3. Recreation Element. This plan for parks and recreational facilities can utilize seismic safety information to an extent by including seis- mically hazardous areas in major parks and taking advantage of local seismic features for linear parks and similar facilties important at the local level. Contra Costa County has an adopted Recreation Element that is periodically updated. PROJECT REVIEWS The most expeditious results from this Seismic Safety Element program can be gained through the process of legal reviews for both public and private projects because they rely to a substantial extent on the pro- ject sponsor to respond to the findings of studies prepared for the pro- ject. The basic recommendations here are that the Seismic Safety Element be utilized to its fullest in performing project reviews and that the County give a high priority and adequate staffing to this effective package of programs- Project rograms.Project Review Programs The main project review programs administered through the County Planning Department are: 1. Section 65401 Capital Projects Review. Section 65401 of the Govern- ment Code requires public agencies to submit yearly capital projects lists to the planning agency for review as to general plan conformance. This program is important because projects tend to be submitted in advance of detailed design, when they are most amenable to change. All projects can be reviewed in terms of the Seismic Safety Element's policies and recommendations. 2. Section 65402 Public Projects Reviews. Section 65402 requires that public and related agencies submit improvements project and land transfer proposals to the planning agency for advisory reviews rela- tive to general plan conformance. Again, general plan conformance includes conformance to the Seismic Safety Element. 3. Clearinghouse Reviews. The County Planning Department processes most notices from the State and, mainly, the Regional Clearinghouse (ABAG) regarding the funding program applications of cities, districts, and other units of government. Already several external agencies have been advised that their proposed projects have not adequately or properly taken seismic risks into accounty. This is an important program for obtaining the adherence of non-County agency projects to the criteria of the County's Seismic Safety Element. 59 :!183 4. Environmental Impact Reports. This is the most effective of the pro- ject review programs because E.I.R. 's are written for most substantial projects and because they investigate the specifics of a location. The raw information developed for the background report has been instru- mental in changing the designs of a large number of projects by indi- cating the probable presence of geologic hazards, which were then con- firmed by site investigations. The E.I.R. process is expected to become even more effective when the administrative map series recommended by the Technical Background Report have been prepared. Administrative Maps for Project Reviews 1. Geology Map Set. To show latest mapping of County bedrock formations by the U.S. Geological Survey and California Division of Mines and Geology, classified for planning purposes by the County Planning Department. 2. Fault Map Set. To show earthquake faults, fault zones (including S.B. 520 information), and fault-related conditions. This is essen- tially a drafting effort. 3. Ground Response Map Set. Shows areas subject to varying degrees of damage (seismic risk) susceptibility under earthquake conditions. 4. Liquefaction Map Set. Shows areas subject to liquefaction under design earthquake stress. May be combined with Ground Response Map . if permitted by the extent of detail required of each. ' S. Landslide Potential Map Set. Shows landslide-prone areas. 6, Flooding Nap Set, Shows areas subject to levee failure, tsunami inundation, and dam failure. Recommended for preparation in connec- tion with the Safety Element. POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTION The-act of the Board of Supervisors in adopting an element of the County General Plan implies certain policy positions relative to other units of government, and the giving of certain administrative directions to County departments. In the case of the Seismic Safety Element, it is recommended that these positions and directions be communicated formally as a means of implementation. Among other considerations, this will facilitate implemen- tation through the project review process. Specifically, the following actions should be taken: 1. Agencies of the federal government making physical improvements in Contra Costa County (Department of the Xavy, etc.) or administering development programs (Department of Housing and Urban Development, etc.) should be requested to observe the County's seismic safety criteria and policies in carrying out their programs. i 60 00186 s TMII v 2. Similarly, appropriate agencies of the State should be requested to observe the County's seismic safety criteria and policies. 3. Regional agencies should be informed, especially the Regional Clearing- house (ABAG) . 4. Non-County public agencies and utilities making physical installations in the County should be informed. S. The several cities in the County should be informated pursuant to State Planning Law. 6. County departments should be directed to comply with the Element. 7. Non-public associations and financing institutions involved in the development process should be informed, of the Element's policies. ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATION As effective as advisory or disclosure project reviews may be, ultimately the force of law is needed to back up the review process or deal directly with some of the more difficult hazardous situations. The planning agency already administers several ordinances that regulate development and these are adaptable to the implementation of the Seismic Safety Element. 1. Fault Zone Ordinance. A special ordinance needs to be written and adopted by the County dealing with the specialized subject of imple- menting the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act. The proposed ordinance should require applicants for real estate developments or structures for human occupancy within official Special Studies Zones to comply with the provisions of the law and establish a fee schedule 2. County Zoning Ordinance. The County Zoning Ordinance should be amended to provide specifically that seismic safety is a significant public purpose underlying the exercise of zoning requirements in Contra Costa County. The amendment should require geologic and other studies in areas found to be potentially hazardous. It should also refer to com- pliance with the general plan (meaning compliance with the Seismic Safety Element and other related subject matter) pursuant to Section 65800 of the State Planning Law. 3. County Subdivision Ordinance. The County Subdivision Ordinance should be amended in a manner similar to that recommended above for the zoning ordinance. It is noted that both the Governor's Earthquake Council and the Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety have recommended changes to the state statutes to make it clear that the furtherance of seismic safety is within the scope of "police power" purposes for zoning and subdivision regulations. 61 . 0018'7 • 4. Specific Plans. Although the implementation instrument known as the specific plan, which is provided for in State Planning Law, is not technically an ordinance it functions as an ordinance by setting forth detailed requirements which development proposals must adhere to. It is recommended that future consideration be given to showing faults and fault :one lines on Specific Plans because of the greater legal surety that would be obtained in administering these maps. The Speci- fic Plan is an ideal instrument for this purpose but it does require highly accurate information for mapping that is not currently available. OTHER PLANNING INPLENE.' rAT1ON Professional Services It became evident during the preparation of the Seismic Safety Element that the services of the project's professional geologist were in great demand for other projects and by other agencies. Consequently, the . initial draft of the Technical Background Report contained the recom- mendation that a permanent registered geologist be added to County staff and remarked in justification that the workload of environmental impact reports and area plan updating (among other projects) warranted the posi- tion. Shortly thereafter, the Alqui.st-Priolo Fault Zones Act became law, obliging the County to use the services of a registered geologist. The Technical Background Report recommendation was implemented in the 1974-75 fiscal year. Seismic Safety Administrative Referral Panel Because the administration of seismic safety requirements involves a wide range of technical knowledge and the exercise of judgment and in- terpretation, it would be desirable for Contra Costa County to create a panel of experts to assist in its administrative process. Such a panel could be modeled after the Bay Conservation and Development Com- mission's Engineering Criteria Review Board and include senior repre- sentatives of the geological, structural, engineering, and soils en- gineering professions in its composition. The panel could advise staff on Seismic Safety Element matters, but its primary function would be to serve as a referral body for appeals on administrative decisions on seismic safety matters made to regular planning appeal bodies such as the Zoning Administrator, Board of Appeals, and the Board of Supervisors. It might also serve as a referral panel for the administration of the building code. Contra Costa County has an unusual resource in the number of its resi- dents who are prominent in seismic safety fields. This panel would seek to enlist the services of some to benefit local development. 62 U U The responsibilities of such a panel would have to carefully defined in view of its relationships to several planning functions, to several County agencies, and even to other units of government if the County contracts the services of its specialists. Therefore, it is recom- mended that the County establish an inter-departmental study group to review this matter and that the study group report its findings within two years of the adoption of the Seismic Safety Element. City-County Cooperation Since seismic features and seismic hazards exist over wide areas, and since most cities in Contra Costa County cannot justify their own registered geologists for general plan work and Alquist-Priolo Act ad- ministration, the draft Technical Background Report recommended that the County contract the services of a staff geologist to its cities. This recommendation began to be implemented when the Planning Geologist position was made permanent. POST DISASTER GENERAL PLAN REVIEW It should be a standing policy of the Board of Supervisors that the Planning Department will conduct a review of the County General Plan following an earthquake or other disaster, with particular emphasis on the areas affected and the subjects in need of attention. The circumstances may warrant that a reconnaissance study be conducted and a more extensive program proposed to the legislative body. In this connection, Contra Costa County should support (or initiate if necessary) actions by the state to make available planning and re- development grants under federal programs to local units of government impacted by disasters. EMERGENCY OPERATING AGENCIES The agencies listed below perform the functions of preparedness (pre- disaster planning and preparations), emergency operations (disaster res- ponse) and recovery. Their specialized services would be most evident during and immediately following a major earthquake. County Office of Emergency Services The County Office of Emergency Services is a division of the County Admin- istrator's Office. It is responsible for the management of programs and the development of plans to enable the County to respond to any emergency or disaster caused by an act of man or an act of nature. 63 V�I o041 u logo a .. .'. A major responsibility of the agency is planning for the full utilization • of the total resources of the County under emergency or disaster condi- tions. The basic means for accomplishing this is the County Emergency Plan. This plan, which is approved by the State and adopted by the Board of Supervisors, establishes the County's Emergency Organization, specifies policies and general procedures, and assigns tasks and responsibilities to the participating agencies and organizations. An Earthquake Response Plan is included in the County Emergency Plan. Mutual aid, wherein one jurisdiction or agency will assist another jurisdiction whose response capabilities have been exceeded by disaster, is provided for in the plan. The headquarters for emergency operations during a disaster is the County Emergency Operating Center (EOC) located near Glacier Drive and Highway 4 in Martine_. It is a communications center, an intelligence collection center, the key point for coordination and control of all emergency actio- ities, and is the receiving point for weather information, flood warnings, river bulletins, fire and police information, and earthquake and tsunami alerts and warnings. The facility also serves as the day-by-day offices for the Office of Emergency Services and the Communications Division of the Sheriff's Office. The County Office of Emergency Services maintains a close working relation- ship with state agencies, federal agencies, other counties, and with emer- gency resource agencies from the private sector. This helps to ensure com- patibility and uniformity of plans and facilitates coordination of emergency operations, particularly under major disaster conditions. • Discussion with the Office of Emergency Services indicate that the following steps would significantly improve the County's capabilities to respond to a severe earthquake: 1. Supporting Plans. Although the County has an approved Emergency Mar_, a number of supporting plans have not been prepared yet, and several adopted supporting plans were prepared several years ago and are in need of review and updating. Some of the supporting plans which require updating pertain to the earthquake response capabilities of the County. Detailed service supporting plans should be prepared for those agencies that do not have them (Logistics, Transportation, Welfare and Shelter, and Operational Facilities). Plan preparation should be done in coop- eration with County Office of Emergency Services personnel. Addition- ally, all plans should be reviewed or revised at two year intervals. 2. Training of Personnel. In an emergency situation, coordination and cooperation of all agencies having a disaster response function is critical to success. This requires training activities which familiarize key personnel with plans and procedures, and workshops to familiarize personnel with the responsibilities of their organizations during an emergency situation. Additionally, key personnel from each unit should be exposed to an earthquake exercise similar to the 1971 Command Post Exercise conducted by the County Office of Emergency Services. bd 010 90 operations Center The Comity urgency OP ency opera- Emergency pera- c Operations Centex. ace for full-scale emergency �. Energen Y p ,..-v operations Center must not hwe sufficient space rn, Iry L - leu ,,e.L vice suPPortin that � not have them g plans should be and Operational rfogistics, Transportation, for those a eration with Co Facilities), pI portation agencies untY Office of � Preparation sL WelUld fbaere and Shel ter, ally, all plans should be reviewed encY Services done in coop_ or revised at Personnel. Addition_ 2' Training of Personnel. two Year intervals. cooperation of alIa emergency critical gencies havin situation, coordination and key to success. Ibis r g a disaster res J personnel with equines training PO7e function is Personnel with Plans and procedures g activities which emer t- and heir workshopsand :familiarize gency situs Add: oft or to familiarize be e-rPosed to earthquake ganizations during an Exercise conducted hquake exercisekeY Personnel from each the Counil. Office ofsimilar to the 1972 unit should Emergenc Command Post Y Services. 1 . 64 00190 3. Emergency Operations Center. The County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) does not have sufficient space for full-scale emergency, opera- tions. In any major disaster, the Emergency Operations Center must be of adequate size to properly accommodate not only necessary County personnel, but numerous representatives from supporting military units, and from other Federal and State agencies. To enable all coordinating personnel to function at peal: efficiency, they should be located with- in the Emergency Operations Center in very close proximity to one an- other, preferably in a large operations room with communications facil- ities adjacent. The present facility is housed in an unreinforced hollow concrete block structure of questionable seismic response characteristics. Moreover, it does not have adequate space to properly accommodate the number of personnel required for full scale emergency operations. An adequate . facility which can withstand the tremendous forces generated by a major earthquake is absolutely essential if, under those conditions, the needs of the public are to be served. 4. Communications Study. In connection with Emergency Operations Center needs, a study should be made of the seismic survivability of the County's communications systems. This plan has previously noted that components of the Communications System are susceptible to earthquake damage. California Office of Emergency Services In the context of the Seismic Safety Element, it should be noted that in a major disaster the resources of even a well prepared local jurisdiction may be overwhelmed. For these reasons the State of California has assumed considerable responsibility for comprehensive natural disaster preparedness planning and disaster assistance in a declared emergency. The State Office of Emergency Services has responsibility for comprehensive emergency preparedness planning at the State level. It prepares the Calif- ornia Emergency Plan, which establishes a statewide emergency organization and coordinates the emergency activities of all agencies. At present the State Office of Emergency Services is developing an Earthquake Response Plan. An equally important function of the State OES is to give a tech- nical and administrative review to the emergency plans prepared by local jurisdictions. One purpose of that review is to ensure a coordinated and efficient response to an emergency situation, such as a severe earth- quake, by all agencies and governments. The plans prepared by local govern- ments must mesh together to prevent gaps or inconsistencies. Similarly, local plans and State plans should compliment one another and be compatible with Federal plans to establish a "chain of command" which enables the smallest city to call upon the resources of the entire nation through mutual aid. Additionally, the State Office of Emergency Services recommends working relationships between local governments and relief organizations, such as the American stational Red Cross. The State Earthquake Plan has not been finalized. Hopefully, this plan will be finalized and published during the next year. 65 : 191 Basically, coordination between emergency planning at the local level and state level exists now and is on-going. No additional implementation measures are proposed at this time. Federal Disaster Assistance Administration The Act of Congress constituting the Federal Disaster Assistance Admin- istration provides for the mobilizing of federal personnel and resources immediately upon the declaration of a major disaster. The purpose of the federal program is to supplement local and state programs, thus improving their capability of adequately responding to emergencies, such as those which are created by damaging earthquakes. With respect to disaster planning, the role of the federal government has been to provide financial incentives to local and state government to de- velop comprehensive plans and practical programs. At present, for example, approximately SO percent of the operating budget of the Contra Costa County Office of Emergency Services is defrayed by federal matching funds. The Disaster Relief Act of 1974 provides for appointment of a Federal Coordinating Officer (FCO) immediately upon declaration of a major disaster by the President. The FCO is responsible for determining the types of federal relief most urgently needed and coordinating the procurement and allocation thereof with the State Coordinating Officer. He will also coor- dinate the activities of the Red Cross and other relief or disaster assis- tance organizations which are national in their scope and that agree to act and operate under his advice or direction. A working relationship exists, largely through the State, between the County Office of Emergency Services and the Federal Disaster Assistance Administration. No additional implementation measures are proposed at this time. American National Red Cross The Act of Congress constituting the American Red Cross charter requires the Red Cross to undertake relief activities to mitigate suffering caused by disasters and obligates the Red Cross to develop and carry out measures to prevent such suffering. Through a program of disaster preparedness by Red Cross chapters, the American Red Cross provides disaster victims with food, clothing, shelter, first aid and supplemental medical care. The assistance provided by the Red Cross includes emergency mass care, emer- gency service on an individual family basis and post disaster aid for recovery to families. Because the American Red Cross is financed by voluntary contributions, the amount of assistance it can provide independently is limited by the availability of volunteers and supplies. However, federal and state agencies may distribute, through the Red Cross, medicine, food or other consumables and may render other emergency assistance. Red Cross aid is not dependent upon a Presidential declaration of a major disaster but can be provided regardless of the size of the catastrophe, the number of people involved, or the commitments of any other voluntary or governmental agency. 66 VJ 910rp The County Office of Emergency Services is in continual contact with the local chapters of the Red Cross. A close working relationship also exists between the County Social Service Department and local Red Cross chapters. These organizations are attempting to coordinate their efforts to aid disaster victims following a major earthquake or other catastrophe. A direct working relationship exists between the County Office Of Emergency Services (as well as other County agencies) and local chapters of the Amer- . , .; t nef e-nnr r-t Because the American Red Cross is financed by voluntary contributions, the amount of assistance it can provide independentlyis federal limited by the and availability of volunteers and supplies. However, agencies may distribute, through the Red Cross, medicine, food or other consumables and may render other emergency assistance. Red Cross aid is can not dependent upon a Presideeetiil declof aration he of fra majohe, the2nuster mber oft tpeople be provided regardless o involved, or the commitments of any other voluntary or governmental agency 66 00192 • The County Office of Emergency Services is in continual contact with the local chapters of the Red Cross. A close working relationship also exists between the County Social Service Department and local Red Cross chapters. These organizations are attempting to coordinate their efforts to aid disaster victims following a major earthquake or other catastrophe. A direct working relationship exists between the County Office Of Emergency Services (as well as other County agencies) and local chapters of the Amer- ican Red Cross. The County should continue to coordinate and cooperate with the Red Cross on problems of mutual interest. No additional implemen- tation measures are proposed at this time. SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS This Seismic Safety Element has stressed the inadequacies in the seismic data and geological mapping available for Contra Costa County. These inadequacies need to be overcome if the County is to take proper seismic safety precautions in proceeding with building and development. For the most part, the needed information is produced through regular programs of agencies of other units of government. The purpose of this section is to review the principal scientific programs which provide information on the seismicity and geology of the County, to review the informational needs of the County and to recommend actions to fulfill these needs. Seismic Monitoring The systematic monitoring of seismic activity is necessary to establish indices of risk and exposure to earthquakes of various magnitudes, durations, and accelerative force, and to verify and locate active earthquake faults. Monitoring by General Purpose Seismographs. As noted previously, since 1934 the University of California has been monitoring the seismicity of the Bay Area. Their network of general purpose seismographs, which are capable of identifying earthquakes as small as approximately 2.0 on the Richter scale, have recorded nearly 600 earthquakes with epicenters in or immediately adjacent to Contra Costa County during this period. Because of the sparce number of instruments, epicenter locations are subject to varying degrees of error. In general, the more recent earthquake events and the stronger events tend to be the most accurately located, and even these events may be mislocated by a mile or more. In addition to provi- ding information for calculating the location of epicenters, seismogram records yield data on earthquake magnitude, focal depth and type of fault slip which gave rise to the earthquake shocks. The seismograms also re- cord the physical characteristics of the ground motion itself including accelerations, velocities, period, displacements and cycles of seismic loading. 67 p=1193 Microseismic Event Monitoring. Since 1969 the National Center for Earth- • quake Research (INCER) has been monitoring microseismic events in the San Francisco Bay Area using a network of special-purpose telemetered seis- mographs which record continuously, transmitting data directly to the Center's office in Menlo Park for processing and interpretation. Their microseismic network provides improved information for locating earth- quake epicenters as well as being able to detect very small magnitude earthquakes. These are important since they allow for a more precise identification of active seismic zones. During 1970 alone over a hundred earthquake epicenters were detected in those portions of the County being monitored (western and central Contra Costa County) . Systematic patterns are beginning to emerge which delineate linear seismic zones. As previously mentioned, these are zones where slippages are occurring at depth (minor faulting taking place in the sub= surface) and thus are "red flags" identifying potentially active faults. Microseismic monitoring in Contra Costa County dates from only 1970. The network has been monitoring seismic events ranging in magnitude from 0.5 to greater than 4.0. During the 1973-74 fiscal year the National Center for Earthquake Research began to expand its network into eastern Contra Costa County by establishing new stations east of the Diablo Range. One station was sited near Antioch and another station near Altamont in Alameda County. Additionally, the Center expects to locate a seismic station near San Pablo to provide better control over the location of • earthquake epicenters in western Contra Costa County and adjacent areas. With respect to the existing programs it should be recognized that the siting of stations must be based on scientific considerations. However, it is apparent that several active seismic zones bisect the County and that the "crustal model" for this area is in need of refinement. It would be desirable for the County to cooperate with LACER in their efforts to establish additional stations in the County and, if feasible, engage in a cooperate study with the National Center for Earthquake Research to Ouodify the crustal model. These steps would significantly improve the precision with which epicenters are computed. Strong-Motion Programs. A strong-motion seismograph (also called accelero- graph) is an instrument designed to record the stronger vibrations caused by earthquakes. It records only when a strong earthquake triggers the instrument. The records are used in designing structures to be earthquake resistant. 68 00194 N Sing- , motion instruments were rr a v t� Strong-Motion Programs. A strong-motion seismograph (also called accelero- graph) is an instrument designed to record the stronger vibrations triggethe ed by earthquakes. It records only when a strong earthquake instrument. The records are used in designing structures to be earthquake resistant. 68 vv1s4 Strong-notion instruments were not developed until 1932 and as recently as 1971 there were only 500 instruments in California, and the majority of these accelerographs were sited in tall buildings in the City of Los Angeles. Only four instruments were located in Contra Costa County as recent as January, 1974. Recognizing the need for instruments in geo- graphic areas not yet covered; on representative soil and rock sites throughout the state; and on a broad group of representative buildings and structures, the 1971 California Legislature established a statewide strong-notion seismograph instrumentation program. It was funded by a very small percent assessment on estimated building costs as determined by the issuance of building permits. (For administrative economy, the County appropriates its fee to the state and sets its permit fee to in- directly cover costs.) Strong-notion instruments were not developed until 1932 and as recently as 1971 there were only 500 instruments in California, and the majority of these accelerographs were sited in tall buildings in the City of Los Angeles. Only four instruments were located in Contra Costa County as recent as January, 1974. Recognizing the need for instruments in geo- graphic areas not yet covered; on representative soil and rock sites throughout the state; and on a broad group of representative buildings and structures, the 1971 California Legislature enacted Chapter 8, Division 2 of the Public Resources Code which established a statewide strong-motion seismograph instrumentation program. It was funded by a very small per- cent assessment on estimated building costs as determined by the issuance of building permits. (For administrative economy, the County appropriates its fee to the state and sets its permit fee to indirectly cover costs.), 'the California Division of Mines and Geology administers the State program with advice from an Advisory Board appointed by the State Geologist. It is carried out in cooperation with other government agencies, both State and federal. All State instruments are integrated into the Strong-Motion Network of the Seismic Engineering Branch of the U.S. Geological Survey. As of June, 1974 only one State instrument had been installed in the County. It is sited in the Antioch School District Service Building at Sth and G Streets in Antioch. The Site Selection Committee has authorized the siting of another two instruments in the Danville area. One of these instru- ments will be established on an alluvial site and the remaining station will be sited on bedrock. The Site Selection Committee also authorized an array of four instruments which will extend from Seal Rock through San Francisco and across the Hayward fault. It is probable that at least one of these stations will be located in the County. 69 0019a i i The County should actively encourage studies which will provide the basic data needed to assess or reduce earthquake risk. With respect to strong-motion instrumentation, the County should urge the State to assign a high priority to establishing instruments in critical areas, such as the Delta Islands and the levees which protect them. Such data would provide a more reliable basis for predicting ground response and evaluating seismic risk in monitored areas. Crustal Movement Programs Seismographs and accelerographs record seismic events but another kind of program that is needed is one to monitor the cumulative effects of the movements of rupture and creep in the earth's crust. It was previously noted that these movements continue to reshape the landscape of Contra Costa County, and eventually enough may be known about them to allow a mathematical model to be made of the shifts occur- ring in the Bay Area which will enable scientists to predict earthquakes. There is already evidence that unusual deformation takes place in the earth's crust prior to the highly damaging shallow focus earthquakes, such as those which occur in California. There are several public agencies that conduct crustal movement studies through advanced forms of surveying or instrumentation in the Bay Area. These include the U.S. Geological Survey, and agencies recently assigned to it, and the California Division of Mines and Geology. The earliest instrumental measurement of crustal deformation along active faults was provided by geodetic triangulation. Within the Bay Area, re- triangulation following the 1906 San Francisco earthquake documented the right-lateral offset which had occurred on the San Andreas fault. In the late 19S0's precise trilateration surveying methods and instruments were developed which facilitate more accurate measurement of crustal movement. And more recently instruments have been developed which make it possible to continuously monitor fault slip, strain, and tilt. Table 10 summarizes crustal movement programs and instruments within the County; it also includes comments on observations made to date. County agencies should be aware of these programs and the significance of the observations made to date. While seismologists are unable to predict earthquakes at present, the information gathered to date should be considered in the design and location of man-made structures. 70 010196 is Of active faults vent potential d encourage an nes the mo Count) sbouplvis. of .,,.P accurately r.record fault, area Californ« such faults COunr „L.. u„ Observations of the agencies should ode to ..�., ..jL jn t Predict r rations be aware of dare. he Count Y, be cot Idered in e e a pr 0 date. jle eprograms and the s. eszgnent* a Info mol°gists jgnlficance and 2°cation�t� ode gathered r° date e unabl s r° structures. should ` ► 70 i a 9LP In order to more accurately assess the movement potential of active faults in the County, such as the Concord fault, the County should encourage and cooperate with the U.S. Geological Survey and California Division of Mines in efforts to establish a network of survey lines across such faults at critical locations. In the event that these agencies are unable to con- duct such a program in a reasonable time, the County should solicite coop- eration from affected cities and public utilities to install its own net- work. MAPPING PROGRAMS This Element has stressed the need for additional detailed geologic mapping in order for the County to round out its Seismic Safety Element and its (proposed) seismic-safety administration maps. In summary, these are the mapping programs involved-. 1. Special Studies Zones Maps (California Division of Mines and Geology). This mapping which is carried out by the State Geologist for the administration of the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act (S.B. S20) shows active faults and associated special studies zones. Cur- rently, the mapping is far from complete; for example, it relied largely on published mapping and initially did not include major faults in central or eastern Contra Costa County. This mapping is of such importance to the administration of the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act that the County should at least urge the State Legislature to appropriate additional funds to accelerate this mapping program; if necessary, the County should join with its cities to help finance a fault mapping project by the Divi- sion of Mines and Geology to ensure the timely preparation of these maps. 2. Bedrock Geology (U.S. Geological Survey). As previously noted, the U.S.G.S. is preparing a set of basic geology maps for this area as part of the San Francisco Bay Region Environment and Resources Planning Study at the scale of 1:62,S00. The coverage for the eastern part of Contra Costa County already has been published. No additional County action is needed. 3. Surficial Deposits Maps (U.S. Geological Survey) . The U.S.G.S. is also preparing a map series which show the distribution of surficial deposits in the County at a scale of 1:62,500. It is anticipated that these maps will be published in the next year. No additional County action is needed. Although it is mentioned briefly in an earlier section of this report, it should be reemphasized that the next severe earthquake to impact this area will provide geologists and engineers with a vast amount of critical infor- mation on the seismic response characteristics of geologic units and man- made structures in this County. To facilitate proper consideration of these factors into land use, facilities and service planning during the post- 71 00197 -+ 0 n DD 3 3 ty -+ Q Z3 -'+ C.�vZQ C 011, —+ ri Q O�i O Q 3 O e w d = °' r 03 ` 4• a r '�M rt u a iMjr aaa e32'c � : e �a� 3 «MQ� +r*-{ rn 7 ' .a M to O g '^-i s c � t w s 3 �o Q 3 CM CO no Qoao ' foD e3vcw a.'. r!c n0t c3 mx > > "c �3 s n �' y3 .at f o e 1 = w g 1 3 4 n Q- Z C) S.0 y c . a ac0 o < 3o aa3 �a3 '+0 Ox {� 3`naC C M ' r iZ 3 a t 3 K c C to < 3 S M a O O 0 m 1 S 3 ' O E ' a 3 n t ;0 w A , V- rtt� �a a CO • ii w a @r Q g 00 o n^' a s O a j e O-o m n2* ' a p D a--, C Z c!1 3 3 " 3 ic- it a t 1 a 4 3 00 Cr a a w s va D�• nm a oa a w srs' Z -0 c o o Mit c c3 a to :v s e3 370 e rc rn C `K � f1 2 2 C1 a m '*• ^ 0 a A7D .c • a �c a Q C q E f f t o a Q < m A cn +in cn « O a Q • 3 0 . . 3 i 3- 0 _ ca.ws "aNfN Z � _ • 3 w 3 w C �/ 3 .ae ,a .a .O -o,O m o- o- a a m o- -� n o o �. ars o* �o catnry •^ rr• r M 4A M i�7• V mea N -Di Mc c0* v o ,p — Q --4 Ln N Z > 10 0 V N --/ 0 9P M �y tr G1 p z II m { C �On Nn r+ ..,•Aa r n � nn aw• D n (1 a 51M c • a 6 a 3 . 9 s 3 + Q c A •N p O M K i i ?O 3 K i -n'Gi n r = -a a is i Si c a i� 2.12. 3 , p^ v a C o a s a a a a CL On 3 2 f Q as a `moo T a • 2 .2 a o a o n .� n n j S C a ,�.a. o a C a 4 u m C o �. Z-il o a'%3 a a s o a" o Cr a o y a a v► zr a. ' CQr�.'m O • M ' u ', 3 SJ• 3 • a 0 g a V _ R 0 w p ' O O O' a CL Z-ca NJ i 72 earthquake period, the County should urge the State to undertake appropriate mapping and engineering studies as soon as practicable after any damaging preliminary results of these earthquake. To be fully effective at least studies should be available no more than 90 days after the earthquake. rn m am A NO a a e \0 2 =ro 3 .c• �-' m Qm 3 ' 3 c Q fl c C a Q'n \aeon o a •• o � 'an � 4 w M a, mto CD O �� O O a3 40 0 a— n n 1a a C1 a`c o < o'o A 'S e n a C N , 0 C �. a y o " � m Q a N Q e s rn %n T0 o Q� /y��+o 3 3Te r O Q Q C 72 UV earthquake period, the County should urge the State to undertake appropriate mapping and engineering studies as soon as practicable after any damaging earthquake. To be fully effective at least preliminary results of these studies should be available no more than 90 days after the earthquake. AID, GRANT, AND INSURANCE PROGRAiaS In the event of a major earthquake, or other disaster, Contra Costa County government, firms, and residents most likely would be the recipients of grants and aid from the federal government to facilitate recovery. Addi- tionally, individuals and firms probably would be assisted by tax write- offs on portions of their damages under both State and federal tax laws. In the future, however, it is expected that more reliance will have to be placed on insurance programs, and taxes may be used in a positive manner to obtain seismic protection. Aid and Grant Programs Originally, public aids for recovery to disaster areas were given on an ad hoc basis, usually by state governments, and usually for particular facilities projects. By the early 1970's the situation had evolved to the extent that the federal government had become the near exclusive source of financial aid for recovery and not only government but indivi- duals and firms had become eligible to receive it. Public Law 93-288, the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, enables assistance outlined in Table 11. TABLE I SUNDRY OF POST DISASTER PROGRAMS WHICH MAY. BE AVAILABLE FOLLOWING A SEVERE EARTHQUAKE Administrator Assistance Federal Disaster Assistance Funds to state and local governments to Administration (FDAA) restore public facilities and to accomplish the emergency repairs within them. Grants, up to $5000, to individuals that can prove disaster related need over and above the other assistance provided. Emergency assistance to individuals inclu- ding but not limited to transportation, mass care, temporary housing, relocation costs, food stamps, and unemployment com- pensation. American National Red Cross Immediate needs, i.e., temporary shelter, and other philanthropic clothing, food, and medical care. organizations Grants and/or loans to restore and/or re- place the individuals' pre-disaster essen- tial facilities. 73 Aids to Governments. Public Law 93-288, the Disaster Relief Act of 1974, . is the basis for Federal Disaster Assistance to states and local govern- ments in a declared disaster. It provides federal contributions for emer- gency repairs, and restoration to pre-disaster standards, of public facili- ties including those of parks and recreation districts. Another provision of this Act supports development of state and local emergency organizations and those plans necessary to cope with major disasters. The Act provides grants to local governments to compensate for substantial loss of property tax revenue. Because a local government is dependent on sources of tax income that are badly impacted by disasters, such as the pro- perty tax, it finds itself having to maximize its services while it is re- ceiving minimum revenues. Grants made under this section of the law may be made for the tax year in which the disaster occurs and each of the following two years. Provisions for assistance in advance of an imminent major dis- aster are included in the Act. With respect to capital facilities, the Federal program probably will be needed in the future unless a satisfactory insurance program is devised, and its continuation should be supported by Contra Costa County. The Federal government, however, should reasonably be assured that local public installations are not being built in hazardous areas and that structures are designed to withstand the stresses to which they may be exposed. Aids to Firms. The principal federal program that is available to business following a disaster is administered by the Small Business Administration. Major provisions of the disaster loan authorities of SBA include the following: 1. SBA is authorized to provide loans without regard to whether private sources are available for such loans (Public Law 93-288 fixes the maxi- mum allowable interest rate on such loans at 6 percent). 2. SBA loans may not be denied on the basis of the age of the applicant. 3. The dollar value of SBA loans may not exceed the current repair or re- placement cost of the disaster loss. 4. SBA is authorized to provide for refinancing of mortgages and loans. S. In a Presidentially declared "major disaster" the borrower may cancel the principal of a loan in excess of $500, up to $2500. Aids to Individuals. PL 93-288 provides short-to-intermediate term aids ranging from temporary housing to unemployment assistance. The Small Business Administration loan program provides rebuilding loans to indivi- dual property owners impacted by a disaster and further provides a "for- giveness" (virtual grant) feature to those considered as hardship cases. Federal programs for individual aid that make provisions for expanded use of existing aid programs are valuable and needed assists to both indivi- duals and the local economics of areas impacted by disasters. They should be encouraged by Contra Costa County. 74 (YJ200 of SBA loans to individual property owners has been an The present Program ram that has benefitted those who experienced -,.;vPiv expensive prog r;vPlY more than those who s serious 4. SSA is authorized to provide for refinancingof S- In a Presidentially declared ., mortgages and Ioans, the principal of a loan in excess ofdisaster" the borrower Trower may cancel Aids to I , up to $25QQ, Individuals. PL 93-288 ranging from to provides short -irate Business A �o�' housing to unemployment rmediate term aids dministration loan program assistance, dual Property owners i P gram provides rebuildingThe Small disaster loans to indivi- ,giveness" (virtual grant)featureato those cons2� her provides a Federal red as hardship "for- Programs for individual aid P cases. Of existing aid that eaake duals and the localgeon are Provisions for expanded use and needed assists to both indivi- be encouraged by Contra Costa o��� 1mPacted by disasters, They should 74 W200 u The present program of SBA loans to individual property owners has been an excessively expensive program that has benefitted those who experienced little property damage comparatively more than those who suffered serious losses. The SBA mechanism has proven to be too small to process loan re- quests rapidly under widespread disaster conditions (e.g., San Francisco earthquake area) . The forgiveness feature is subject to misuse. Contra Costa County should support the replacement of this program. Probably, a combination of public loan supports through private lending institutions and mandatory earthquake insurance would prove more workable. Insurance Because of rising costs in providing aids to disaster areas, state and fed- eral governments are increasingly looking to insurance as a future mainstay to recovery. 'Ihe '1973 Federal Flood Insurance Act, which requires insurance and land use controls in flood-prone areas, is a step in that direction. Earthquake insurance is widely available from the private insurance industry at rates which are affordable to most people. However, few properties in California are covered by earthquake insurance. The likely reason the public is not generally purchasing this insurance is because they consider the prob- ability of damage in any given year to be too low to insure against, and the premiums too high (most people mould probably use the same rationale to refuse fire insurance, were it not required by lending institutions) . Some insurance companies have hesitated to offer or promote the sale of earth- quake insurance because of their inability to accumulate reserves to cover the probability of large-loss events. The Governor's Earthquake Council and the Legislative's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety both have encouraged, essentially, that earthquake insurance be required much as fire insurance is now obligatory for new residential pro- perty loans and urged as part of comprehensive insurance packages to cover remaining residences. The insurance industry is also considering this posi- tion. At the present time, proposals under discussion are for this kind of insurance to be extended to, say, one-to-four unit residential structures. The insuring of larger residential structures and commercial or industrial buildings against earthquake damage is considered to be a more complex pro- blem and one which may Ientail federal reinsurance of companies because of the concentration of risks and the limitations on companies' accumulating large reserves. It should also be recognized that "universal" disaster insurance covering floods, tornados, hurricanes, and other causes is being discussed elsewhere in the United States. There is some speculation within the insurance indus- try that the federal government may take the initiative in offering this kind of insurance if the industry does not respond. Depending on :.he appropriateness of the particular proposals, Contra Costa County should encourage state and federal efforts to have citizens insure their properties against disasters. Earthquake insurance is needed, but all-risk insurance covering flooding and land failure is preferable. In some parts of Contra Costa County, disaster insurance may become a pre- requisite to development. y' 75 00201 Taxation Programs It is beyond the scope of this Seismic Safety Element to cover the complex provisions of state and federal tax law as they pertain to the write-off of damages suffered through earthquakes and other disasters. Suffice it to say that these provisions exist and that they are usually reasonable. There are, however,"two aspects of taxation that warrant consideration and recom- mendation for County action. The first area of concern relates to the assessment of property in seismically hazardous areas. As has previously been mentioned, the state law requiring a Seismic Safety Element places with local government the responsibility for establishing effective land use controls which guide development in a direction which is appropriate and beneficial to the public, recognizing all relevant factors. However, the taxing powers of government can actually encourage urbanization of a hazardous area by assessing property at a rate which makes agriculture and other types of open space land use uneconomical. A second area of concern to a Seismic Safety Element is the role of the taxing powers of government in promoting seismic safety improvements to existing structures. A tax incentive program could reduce seismic risks at a relatively low cost to taxpayers. At present seismic safety improvements, although they may not increase property values, are taxed like any other improvement. An adequate tax incentive program, designed to upgrade unsafe structures, would substantially reduce losses during the next severe earthquake. It should be • ,emphasized that the cost of such improvements is not solely an economic question since lives as well as property are in danger. Depending on the appropriateness of the particular proposal, Contra Costa County should support legislation to consider geologic hazards in the assess- meet of property and the reassessment of property following a disaster. The former was the subject of the successful Proposition. 4 in the June 1974 General Election. With regard to the seismic safety of existing structures, Contra Costa County should study the support of legislation for a one-time tax write-off of the value of improvements made to bring existing structures up to earthquake standards. The application of such legislation would follow the adoption of definitive standards of structural safety. 76 002Q2 APPENDIX A TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT FINDINGS, POLICIES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Seismic Safety Element is based on its Technical Background Report (see page 3) . Chapters in that report concluded with statements of their findings and proposed policies and recommendations. These are included as part of this plan to add detail to the preceding text. A minimum of editing has been performed to adapt the wording of some statement to their present context. GENERAL SEISMICITY Findings 1. Earthquakes and faulting are a response of rocks to stresses which are set up within them. During the fault movements, strain energy that has accumulated in the earth's crust is converted into earthquake pro- ducing elastic wave energy which radiates from the moving fault plane. The resulting ground motion is responsible for the majority of earth- quake damage. 2. Worldwide, the U.S. Coastal and Geodetic Survey reports approximately S,000 earthquakes per year. Annually, California can expect to exper- ience more than 500 earthquakes which will be strong enough to be re- corded by general purpose seismographs. It should be recognized that the monitoring of earthquakes in California is much better than the world generally. However, most seismologists believe that approximately 1 to 3 percent of the world's earthquakes occur in California. 3. The great majority of earthquakes are not dangerous to life or property either because they occur in sparcely populated areas or because they are small earthquakes which release relatively small amounts of energy. However where urban areas are located in regions of high seismicity, damaging earthquakes are expectable if not completely predictable events. For example, the San Francisco Bay Region has been impacted by more than ten severe earthquakes during historic time. 4. Substantial,earthquakes are typically followed by aftershocks. Some aftershocks can be highly damaging, particularly when centered in densely populated areas or in areas where man-made structures or the ground has been weakened by the main earthquake. Mankind has the capability, through wise land use planning--taking into account the materials and forces of the earth itself--to mitigate the destructiveness of even the most severe earthquakes. i A-1 Policy • 1. In an area of high seismicity, planning, development, and building --i•�vld ir-nYT-ir-t -ri Iti fir -nA -►nQi ---inn t-nd •1-+-iQ-► of - 1Pwthnv-t,-s damaging earthquakes are expectable i. aur u JI. L-1, yL."L.L, -L . Is . For example, the San Francisco Bay Region has been impacted by more than ten severe earthquakes during historic time. 4. Substantial earthquakes are typically followed by aftershocks. Some aftershocks can be highly damaging, particularly when centered in densely populated areas or in areas where man-made structures or the ground has been weakened by the main earthquake. Hankind has the capability, through wise land use planning--taking into account the materials and forces of the earth itself--to mitigate the destructiveness of even the most severe earthquakes. • A-1 00203 i Policy • I. In an area of high seismicity, planning, development, and building should incorporate scientific and engineering knowledge of earthquake causes and the response of ground and structures to earthquake forces. Recommendation I. .All levels of government responsible for guiding and regulating develop- ment and building in seismically active areas should adopt plans, poli- cies and procedures, and enact legislation, to ensure the application of scientific and engineering knowledge to the protection of lives and property- KE CAUSES Findings 1. The "Plate Tectonic Theory", which holds that the earth's crust is com- posed of lithospheric "plates" that are systematically shifting and changing form over a semi-plastic under-surface, for the first time satisfactorily accounts for earthquakes and their distribution. 2. No place on earth is totally safe from earthquakes, but most cluster in narrow, continuous belts of high seismic activity that coincide with . the boundaries of lithospheric plates. S. According to the plate tectonic theory, the San Andreas fault is a major transform fault which forms the boundary between two major litho- spheric plates. That portion of California which lies west of the San Andreas is part of the Pacific Plate; the area east of the San Andreas is part of the Americas Plate. 4. The actively spreading East Pacific Rise causes stress to accumulate in rocks along the San Andreas fault. When the stored energy equals the resistence of these rocks to shearing, fault movement occurs on the San Andreas fault system and California has another earthquake. Policy 1. In an area susceptible to high seismic activity public policy should recognize that a severe earthquake hazard exists and reflect this know- ledge in their programs. Recommendation I. All levels of government functioning in areas susceptible to high seismic activity should direct their agencies to give appropriate attention to seismic safety in the creation and execution of their programs, and cooperate with one another to ensure the effectiveness of their efforts. . A-2 00204 F.ARztic ►xE MEASURENEW Findings 1. During an earthquake, strain energy which has been stored in the crust is converted into elastic wave energy which radiates away from the moving fault plane and produces three kinds of waves that travel through the earth in different ways. Instruments can plot both the location and magnitude of an earthquake by measuring the characteris- tics of recorded wave forms and the time intervals that they are re- ceived. 2. Although three types of waves are transmitted through the earth's crust, most or all of the damage ascribed to ground shaking is attributable to "surface waves". These high amplitude waves are capable of producing' severe damage over a broad area, depending on the magnitude of the earth- quake, local ground conditions, and other factors. 3. Two kinds of systems are universally used to describe earthquakes: the objective mathematically-precise "magnitude" scale (Richter Scale) nec- essary for instrumental measurement and scientific work; and, the more subjective "intensity" scale (Modified Mercalli, or M.M. Scale) that describes locally perceived effects. 4. Three kinds of instrumentation systems are needed to dgcument seismic activity: General Purpose Seismographs to record significant earth- quakes over ride areas; microseismic instruments to measure small trem- ors locally (and locate faults); and strong motion seismographs to re- cord the detailed local characteristics of strong shocks. S. Seismograph records are used for many purposes, such as determini►ig the location of the epicenter, depth of the focus and characteristics of the ground motion. Additionally seismograph records can be used to lo- cate earthquake faults. Policy 1. In seismically active areas, it should be public policy to obtain an operational system of seismic recording instruments (including general purpose seismographs, microseismic instruments, and strong motion seis- mographs) and a related information transmittal system. Recommendation 1. Governments in seismically-active areas should individually and cooper- atively work to secure seismic instrumentation and transmittal systems. � . A-3 Aft EARTHQUAKE GEOLOGIC EFFECTS GENERAL Findings 1. The major geologic effects of earthquakes are: fault displacement, ground shaking, ground failure, and flooding. Policies 1. Public policy regarding seismic safety should consider each of the geologic hazards affecting the area. Recommendation 1. Governments in seismically active areas should individually and Coope- ratively work to identify and evaluate their geologic hazards, and direct their agencies to consider each in their programs. FAULTS AND FAULT DISPLACEMENT Findings 1. A fault is a fracture in the earth's crust along which the two sides • have moved relative to each other. It should be recognized that all active and potentially active faults have a high probability of future movement. With regard to planning and development two aspects of fault displacement should be considered: (a) the effects that sudden movement along faults may have on structures built across their traces, and (b) the relatively slow effects of fault creep on structures built across their traces. 2. Faults vary considerably in their length and significance, from those which are major crustal features having regional importance to minor faults having only local significance. A major fault system may be hundreds or thousands of miles long and displace rocks on opposite sides of the fault by more than a hundred miles. A minor fault may have an extent of a few miles or less and the total offset may be tens of feet or less. It should be recognized that either fault can pose a threat to structures sited astride the fault trace. 3. Fault displacement involves forces so great that the only means of limiting damage to man-made structures to to avoid the traces of active faults, unless structures can be designed to accommodate the expected displacement. Any movement beneath a structure in excess of an inch or two could have catastrophic effects on the structure, depending on its design and construction. 4. Evidence of "active" faulting may include: (1) historic earthquake • A-4 w206 accompanied by surface faulting, (2) tectonic creep, (3) offset of deposits of known or inferred Holocene age (less than approximately 11,000 years) and (4) fault trace defined by youthful fault-related topographic features. S. Evidence for a "potentiall" active fault may include: (1) major historic earthquake in immediate vicinity of fault, (2) alignment of epicenters along a fault trace, (3) offset of deposits of known or inferred Quater- nary age (less than approximately 2 million years) and (4) fault trace defined by eroded,subdued or discontinuous fault-related topography (inactive faults may also exhibit such features) and (5) trace which is mechanically related to an active fault. 6. Faults are typically not singular breaks in the earth's crust by systems of breaks. Those systems include "fault zones", which are localized "shatter belts" of paralleling and connecting faults behaving as a single entity, wide belts containing several paralleling and connecting faults along which energy releases may alternate, and linear series of faults that may link and thereby pose the danger of larger magnitude earthquakes. 7. All traces of a fault are mechanically related. Therefore, if any trace of a fault is known to be aztive, all other traces of the same fault should be considered active, or potentially active. 8. Losses from fault displacement are expected to be low compared to losses from earthquake shaking. It has been estimated by the California Division of Mines and Geology that between 1970 and the year 2000, fault displace- ment losses in California will total $76 million. These losses will occur primarily along well recognized active faults in urban centers and in the surrounding suburban communities. 9. Although losses from fault displacement tend to be relatively low, the risks are greatly increased by inappropriate development. For example, fault movement during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake destroyed 200 houses (average value $25,000) and three commercial buildings (estimated value $200,000) for a total loss of $5.2 million. Policies 1. All faults, active or otherwise can adversely affect structures built over or near them and need to be taken into account in the design of buildings and developments. 2. Structures for human occupancy and those whose loss would affect the public safety or the provision of needed services should not be built over the trace of an active or potentially active fault. 3. Faults with characteristics described in Finding 4, above, should be • classified as active. Faults with characteristics described in Finding S should be classified as potentially -^tive. 4. To the extent practicable, structures requiring a high degree of safety A-5 00207 u and critical structures should not be built in a fault zone. When such structures must be located in a fault zone, the structure should be carefully sited, and designed and constructed to withstand the anti- cipated earthquake stresses. S. the effects of fault displacement are so significant that geologic inves- tigation is warranted as a prerequisite for authorizing public or private construction in areas of known or reasonably suspected faulting. Recommendations 1. Governments in seismically active areas should work individually and cooperatively to locate faults, classify them, and map fault zones. 2. Governments in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies,' and procedures, and enact legislation to implement the above policies. GROUND SHAKING Findings 1. Energy released by an earthquake is transformed into ground waves which radiate outward from their location or origin in a fault. 2. Ground shaking from surface waves is generally the most destructive earth quake effect. Severe ground shaking may occur tens of'miles distant from a strong earthquake. The seismic factors influencing thg observed Modified Mercalli intensities during an earthquake include: (1) magnitude of the earthquake, (2) distance of a particular site from the moving fault plane, (3) focal depth of the earthquake, (4) duration of shaking, and (S) local ground conditions. 3. Ground shaking during an earthquake may be more severe on•.poor ground located farther away from a causative earthquake fault than on solid ground in closer proximity to the fault. 4. It has long been recognized that the performance of a structure during an earthquake is closely related to the nature of the ground on which it rests. Historical data has repeatedly demonstrated that structures sited on water-saturated surficial deposits, landslide deposits, and non-engineered fill are subject to severe damage. The damage experience in these areas is in part due to the amplification of earthquake waves in these materials and in part due to ground failure induced by the earth- quake waves. S. It is estimated that ground shaking will account for $21 billion in damage to public and private property in California during the period 1970-2000. Most of the damage and loss of life will occur in zones of high seismic activity, such as the Bay Area, and most of the damage and loss of life will occur in structures which are built on poor ground or which do not comply with the provisions of Field and Riley Acts, passed in 1933. (California Division of Hines and Geology, Bulletin 198, p. 7.) A-6 00208 Policies 1. In seismically active areas, ground conditions should be a primary deter- minant of land use and of the design of developments. 2. In seismically active areas, structures for human occupancy should be de- signed to survive anticipated earthquake forces without endangering life. 3. Structures for human occupancy, or those whose loss would substantially affect the public safety or the provision of needed services, should not be erected in areas where there is a high risk of destruction in the event of anticipated earthquake conditions. 4. In areas of high damage susceptibility from ground shaking (Zone IV on the Generalized Ground Response Nap) the risks to life and investments are sufficiently high to warrant geologic-seismic and soils studies as a pre-condition for authorizing public or private construction. Addition- ally, significant land use decisions should be based on thorough under- standing of geologic-seismic and soils conditions on the parcel. Studies may be waived for construction of single family homes on approved lots (this provision is necessary since an absolute determination is often not possible, as well as being uneconomical) . Recommendations 1. Governments in seismically active areas should work individually and cooperatively to identify and evaluate ground conditions, relative to land use and building conditions, in their jurisdictions. 2. Governments in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies, and procedures, and enact legislation to implement the above policies. GROUND FAILURE Findings 1. Ground failure occurs when stresses in the ground exceed the resistance of earth materials to deformation or rupture. This instability can be triggered by earthquake shaking, which instantaneously place high stresses on earth materials. The manifestations of ground failure are complex and highly variable; they include numerous varieties of landslides, sloughing, liquefaction, ground cracking, lurching, subsidence and differential settlement. The type of ground failure that develops in a particular area depends on topographic, geologic, hydrologic and engineering characteristics of the ground. 2. Ground failure is not contingent on high slopes, especially under earth- quake conditions. Ground failure during earthquakes has occurred on slopes of less than 293. 3. In areas where a severe slope stability problem exists, landslide damage A_^ vu209 can best be avoided by simply not building on the unstable ground. In less hazardous areas, small landslides can be totally removed or stabilized using accepted engineering methods, including: (a) de- watering the slide by installing drainage devices, (b) buttressing the slide toes and sides with compacted soils and "keying" the engineered fill into bedrock, and (c) reducing stress by removing material from the head of the slide. Decisions need to be based on precise geologic, soils and engineering information. 4. Through good planning and careful, controlled design, landslide losses can be reduced by more than 95 percent (California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin 198, p. 29). S. Corrective costs after construction are high compared to preventive costs, and in some instances it may not be possible to save existing structures. For example, landslide losses in the San Francisco Bay Area during the 1968-69 winter exceeded $25 million (Taylor and Brabb, 1972). Of this total, more than $S million was due to landslides, soil slippage, and drainage problems reported in Contra Costa County. Policies 1. In seismically active areas, ground conditions should be a primary deter- minant of land use and of the design of developments. 2. In seismically active areas, structures for human occupancy should be de- signed to survive anticipated earthquake forces without endangering life. 3. Structures for human occupancy, or those whose loss would substantially affect the public safety or the provision of needed services, should not be erected in areas where there is a high risk of destruction in the event of anticipated earthquake conditions. 4. In areas prone to severe levels of damage from ground shaking, the risks to life and investments are sufficiently high to warrant geologic-seismic and soils studies as a pre-condition for authorizing public or private construction. Recommendations 1. Governments in seismically active areas should work individually and cooperatively to identify and evaluate ground conditions, relative to land use and building conditions, in their jurisdictions. 2. Governments in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies, and procedures, and enact legisltaion to implement the above policies. FLOODING Findings . 1. Historic records have repeatedly shown that fault displacement and A-8 00210 • accompanying ground shakingcapable of causing severe flooding. are P� Flooding can be triggered by dam failure, levee failure, tsunamis and t;vns is ac#.ion. Recommendations I- Governments in seismically active areas should work individually and cooperatively to identify and evaluate ground conditions, relative to land use and building conditions, in their jurisdictions. 2. Governments in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies, and procedures, and enact legisltaion to implement the above policies. FLOODING Findings I. Historic records have repeatedly shown that fault displacement and A-8 002 .0 accompanying ground shaking are capable of causing severe flooding. Flooding can be triggered by dam failure, levee failure, tsunamis and seiches. 2. Because many dams create terminal storage and serve as distribution reservoirs for municipal water systems, they must necessarily be sited on high ground adjacent to population centers. Thus the rapid failure of an important dam Mould lead to catastrophic results to the downstream population. 3. Small reservoirs and stock, ponds frequently are non-engineered structures and they may not have adequate spillways. They can pose severe flood hazard to localized areas below them. Policies 1. Dam and levee failure, as well as potential inundation from tsunamis and seiches, should be a significant consideration in land use planning. 2. Dams (and their empoundments) and levees should be designed to withstand the forces of anticipated (design) earthquakes at their locations. S. Dams (and their empoundments) and levees should be regarded as critical facilities that should not be sited over the trace of an active or poten- tially active fault. 4. The potential effects of dam or levee failure are so substantial that geologic and engineering investigation is warranted as a prerequisite for authorizing public and private construction of either the facilities or development in affected areas. Recommendation 1. Governments in seismically active areas, or areas subject to flooding resulting from seismic activity should work individually and cooperatively to evaluate facility vulnerability and identify areas where flooding could result from earthquakes. 2. Governments in seismically active areas should work to establish adequate standards and tests for dams and levees. 3. Governments in seismically active areas should adopt plans, policies, and procedures. and enact legislation to implement the above policies. COIRM GEOLOGY Findings 1. Seismic activity is an integral part of the geologic forces that have pro- duced Contra Costa County's physical setting and are continuing to shape A-9 its landsca the result Of Pe• 'The geology of the Bay Area region is substantially the crustal the confit ng ui 'movement Of the "Americas pl Marr „¢ in result from earthquakes. Governments in seismically active areas should work to establish adequate 2. Dove standar and tests for dams and levees. active areas should adopt plans, policies, and 3. Governments in seismicalislation to implement the above policies. procedures. and enact leeg COIRM GEOLOGY Findings is an integral part of the geologic forces that have pro- 1. Seismic activit}• physical setting and are continuing to shape duced Contra Costa County's A-9 • its landscape. The geology of the Bay Area region is substantially the result of the continuing movement of the "Americas Plate" against the crustal plate that underlies the Pacific Ocean. 2. Because of its geologic setting in the active and dynamic central Coast Ranges of California, geologic structure in the County tends to be com- plex. The geologically recent uplift of the Briones Hills and Diablo Range has also created a situation where semi-consolidated rock forma- tions of Pliocene age underlie steep hillsides. These conditions can pose serious engineering problems and in some areas long-term stability is difficult to achieve even if extraordinary precautions are incor- porated into site grading and drainage design. 3. Superimposed on the pattern of uplift and deformation which characterizes the central Coast Ranges of California are the processes of erosion and sedimentation which have combined to form the County's northwest trending ridges and valleys. The modern cycle of erosion has given rise to V- shaped valleys and steep slopes. As erosion undercuts slopes, the equi- librium of the hillsides is constantly being disturbed, triggering various types of slope failure, including major landslides. a. Some of the portions of the County, including the Bay Plain, and Delta lowlands are geologically very young. These areas are underlain by poorly consolidated alluvial and esturine deposits which are water sat- urated at shallow depth and possess many adverse enginegring character- istics. Such areas tend to have a low seismic stability and be prone to excess amounts of damage as a reult of ground shaking and associated ground filure. Policies 1. Public policy regarding public and private development should recognize that Contra Costa County is situated on a particularly active and dynamic part of the earth's crust which is presently undergoing deformation, and include adequate geologic and engineering information in the decision- making processes. 2. Geologic conditions should be a primary determinant of land use in Contra Costa County. Generally, urban or suburban uses or intensities should not be planned for areas where geologic conditions would result in unac- ceptable risks to life and safety, and areas where the public costs of overcoming geologic deficiencies would exceed public benefits. ` Recommendations 1. The Contra Costa County Planning Department should develop an administra- tive map primarily for project review operations, based on the mapping of the U.S. Geological Survey, and classifying geologic formations according to their characteristics for land use appropriateness. jut A-10 VV212 2. The County should require geologic and/or soils information to be sub- mitted for Environmental Impact Reports, and entitlement applications, for all development projects in areas of substantial risk, in accordance with the administrative map. Khere warranted by the availability of published and unpublished data, requirements for such studies may be waived for small projects. 3. Contra Costa County should promote, encourage, and/or contract for special geologic studies in problem areas with agencies such as the U.S.G.S. and California Division of Mines and Geology. LOCAL SEISMIC ACTIVITY Findings 1. Contra Costa County has experienced more than six major earthquakes in the relatively short time that written records have been kept (roughly, since 1880) . Some of these originated on faults within the County; the remainder occurred on faults elsewhere in the Bay Area. All took place in the 70 year period between 1836 and 1906; none have happened in the last 68 years. 2. The County has experienced approximately 600 earthquakes on faults inside or near its boundaries since general purpose seismograph monitoring be- gan 40 years ago in 1934. 'hese included 1S events of magnitude 4.0 or greater. Many of the earthquakes can be related to known faults and con- stitute evidence of their activity. 3. Microseismic monitoring for Contra Costa County, still incomplete, is available only since 1970. Data shows concentrations of activity along the Hayward fault, the Calaveras fault, Concord faults, and the seicT zone east of Danville. 4. Prior to 1906, the Carquinez Strait-Suisun Bay area reportedly exhibited the highest seismicity of any region in central California. Policies 1. Public policy in Contra Costa County must recognize that the County is in an area of prevailing high seismic activity in which earthquakes of all levels of magnitude occur. 2. Seismic activity of any level on a fault, or on the fault system of which it is a part, should be regarded as evidence that the fault is potentially active. Recommendations 1. Contra Costa County should actively seek to obtain countywide coverage of the monitoring of microseismic activity. -11 1v1213 { EARTHQUAa PROBABILITY Findings 1. Because of the complexities of the earthquake phenomenon, the short documented history of Bay Area seismic activity, and the inadequacies of current technology, the prediction of the magnitude, time of occur- rence, or locations of earthquakes is presently unreliable. 2. Statistical techniques do allow estimates to be made of the frequencies of different magnitude earthquakes on the major faults affecting Contra Costa County (Table 4) . 3. Historical seismic and geologic information also allow "design earthquakes" to be developed for several of the faults affecting Contra Costa County (Table S). 4. One approach to the evaluation of earthquake risk is to consider the probability of a damaging earthquake occurring during the life of exis- ting or proposed structures. Statistical analysis of historic Bay Area earthquakes indicated that over a SO-year period there is a greater than SO percent probability of a severe earthquake on each of the major Bay Area fault systems (San Andreas, Hayward, and Calaveras). Additionally, it is reasonable to infer that earthquakes which have caused death and property damage have emanated from faults which trend through Eastern Contra Costa County. Policies 1. Public policy in Contra Costa County regarding planning, building and development should be based on the assumption of occurrences of earth- quakes of the magnitudes and in the frequencies estimated in Table 4. 2. Structures that need to withstand earthquakes to protect life or provide significant services should be designed to survive anticipated static and dynamic loads. Recommendations 1. The estimates of earthquake frequencies and magnitudes, and "design earthquakes", should be included in the Seismic Safety Element for adoption by the County and consideration by other jurisdictions. 2. The County Planning Department, in cooperation with other organizations and jurisdictions, should refine the estimates of Tables 4 and 5, and extend them to cover other faults in an near Contra Costa County. LOCAL FAULTS Findings 1. Earthquake faults are inherent features of Contra Costa County's geologic a-12 00214 is structure, and inherent in the geologic processes that produced its landscape. 2. Earthquake faults are numerous in the County--but not "everywhere". Most are parts of systems that parallel the San Andreas fault (which is not present in the County) or radiate outward from Mt. Diablo. 3. Most of the mapped bedrock faults in the County are minor, short in length, and are not known to be active. 4. All faults, to varying degrees, should be given consideration in the design of developments and in site preparation. For example, it should be recognized that many minor, presumed inactive vaults in the County intersect active or potentially active faults. Any movement on the master fault could trigger adjustments on minor cross faults or adjacent subparallel faults. Additionally, structures sited on faults may be ex- posed to high stress concentrations during earthquakes on distant faults owing to the differing ground response of material beneath their founda- tion. Finally, the crushed material in the fault zone as well as the contrasting engineering characteristics of material on opposite sides of a fault can pose a number of special engineering problems. S. There are three levels of risk related to the hazard posed by fault rupture: (a) highest risk to structures straddling the trace in an active fault zone, (b) intermediate risk to structures sited on an active fault zone, but not sited on a trace, (c) lowest risk to struc- tures sited outside of an active fault zone. 6. There are several strong arguments for requiring minimum setbacks from active fault traces. The principal advantages are: (a) to provide a minimum "safety factor" for structures and occupants of structures sited in an active fault zone without placing an unnecessarily stringent re- striction on land use in such fault zones, (b) to allow owners of un- developed property to know what the policy of the County is, and (c) to give the Planning staff and Planning Commission a basic guideline in re- viewing development proposals. 7. It is very important to carefully analyze undivided acreage at the earliest possible stage in the development process with respect to seismic hazards to determine the suitability of land for development. Mistakes made in subdivision and building are virtually impossible to correct through other than the redevelopment process. S. An impressive body of information of faults exists for Contra Costa County. The principal sources of data include the mapping, of the U.S.G.S., D.M.G., field studies performed by registered geologists (e.g., site trenching) and studies conducted by universities and re- search institutions. This information is suitable to accomplish many A-13 00215 Policy planning and project review functions, and generally to guide land planning. 9. In general, fault mapping in the County is not accurate to the level d in nrdin-nce maAs because the locations of individual earliest possible stage in the develtr ,o..um yam. seismic hazards to determine the suitability of land for development. Mistakes made in subdivision and building are virtually impossible to correct through other than the redevelopment process. S. An impressive body of information of faults exists for Contra Costa County. the principal sources of data include the mapping of the U.S.G.S., D.N.G., field studies performed by registered geologists (e.g., site trenching) and studies conducted by universities and re- search institutions. This information is suitable to accomplish many a t A-13 00215 policy planning and project review functions, and generally to guide land planning. 9. In general, fault mapping in the County is not accurate to the level of detail used in ordinance maps because the locations of individual fault traces has not been precisely determined and because faults are variable in the characteristics, 10. Because of the diversity of sources, there is a need to compile a fault map of Contra Costa County which maps fault traces and shows the location of delineated Special Studies Zones. Such a map would be useful in the administration of project reviews and in the administration of develop- ment ordinances. Policies I- Private development proposals within Special Studies Zones must give special consideration to the potential for surface faulting and seis- mically-triggered ground failure. In general, detailed geologic studies will be necessary to accurately map fault traces and evaluate ground con- ditions on the site. Public works and utilities installations should be subject to the same standards that are applied to private development. 2. In exercise of their responsibility to provide for the public safety in Special Studies Zones, public building decisions made by the County shoul be guided by knowledge of fault conditions on the site: Even in instance* where an alternative site is not (readily) available, final judgments should be based on knowledge of the degree of risk and the consequences of failure. 3. Structures intended for human occupancy must not be erected over an active fault trace. 4. To the extent practicable, structures intended for human occupancy should not be erected over the trace of an inactive fault. S- To the extent practicable, structures which affect the provision of needed services (e.g., highway interchanges, utilities) should not be erected over the trace of an active or potentially active fault. Where it is deemed essential to do so for the public welfare, these structures should be designed to accommodate or minimize the effects of fault displacement and seismically-triggered ground failure. 6. Structures intended for human occupancy should be adequately set back from active and potentially active fault traces. Minimum setbacks should take into account the varying degree of seismic risk and conse- quences of failure. 7. Land in the setback ":Jones" along active and potentially active fault traces should be utilized for open forms of land use that could experience A-14 0 216 displacement without endangering large numbers of people or create secondary hazards. Examples are yards, greenbelts, parking lots, and non-critical storage areas. Roads, particularly those which carry large volumes of traffic, should be sited over active faults only where other alternatives are impractical. 8. Comprehensive geologic and engineering studies should be required for any critical structure, whether or not it is located within a Special Studies Zone. Recommendations 1. Contra Costa County, through its Planning Department, should prepare a "fault map" for use in the administration of project reviews (e.g., Environmental Impact Reports and mandatory referrals) and in the admin- istration of development ordinances. Preferably, this map should be done on a countywide basis and in the form of a map series at a scale of 1:24,000 (1" = 20001) to make efficient use of U.S.G.S. and D.M.G. fault information. The map should show: (a) faults, classified by activity status and locational certainty, (b) fault zones or Special Studies Zones, (c) fault-related hazardous conditions, and (d) geo- location and related information. The map's information should include but not be limited to the 1973 fault mapping done for the County by the California Division of Mines and Geology pursuant to S.B. S20. 2. This "fault map" and policies for its use should be adopted by the County, preferably as part of its General Plan (either in the Seismic Safety Ele- ment or special General Plan supplement or alternatively as a matter of policy such as the County's E.I.R. processing procedures) by the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. 3. The conditions of adoption of the fault map should direct that it bC .;on- sidered in the malting of improvements by all agencies under the purview of the Board of Supervisors. These agencies should obtain geologic and engineering studies equivalent to those required of private developments for their own projects. 4. The conditions of adoption of the fault map should direct that it be con- sidered in project reviews performed by County agencies, including Environ- mental Impact Reports, mandatory referrals ("65402" reviews), and regional clearinghouse reviews. These reviews pertain to private projects and the projects of other levels of government as well as County projects. S. The conditions of adoption of the fault map should direct that County agencies consider the map in their administration of development ordin- ances, including the zoning and subdivision ordinances. 6. The County's zoning and subdivision ordinances should be revised to re- quire the consideration of seismic safety factors, including slope sta- bility and seismically-related flooding. A-15 00217 r F 7. The conditions of adoption of the fault map should contain the above policies (or adaptations) as provisions, and should provide for the following minimum setback requirements with the Special Studies Zones of active or potentially active faults: 8. No building for human occupancy should be sited closer than SO feet to an active fault trace* unless a geologic report prepared by a geologist registered in the State of California indicates that a lesser setback is appropriate. Ordinarily such a determination will be based on geologic factors such as the character of the fault, local ground conditions, and depth of the water table. 9. In the administration of development regulations geologic and/or soil investigations should be required for the following projects: a) A geologic and/or appropriately detailed soils investigation and report for all subdivisions and planned unit developments which are crossed by mapped faults. Because of the relatively greater significance of the major fault systems (listed in Table 10), it is also recommended that sub- division and PUD's within approximately 1/8 mile of such a fault be sub- ject to the findings of geologic and/or soils reports. b) A geologic investigation for rezonings, development plans, minor sub- divisions and land use permits when the site is crossed by a major fault_ • system (listed in Table 10) and those within Special Studies Zones delin eated by the State Geologist. In some cases the geologic report for a rezoning can be deferred until a subsequent subdivision or development plan application is made. This is sometimes true of large area rezonings where the appropriateness of the overall proposal may not be contingent on the presence or absence of a fault. In other cases, however, the lo- cation of a fault would have a substantial effect on the project and the geologic study must be a pre-requisite. c) A geologic and/or soils investigation and report for building or grading permits where available information indicates that an active fault trace crosses the site. The standards fdr site analysis should refect the de- gree of awareness of the hazard and the nature of the proposed construc- tion. GROUND SHAKING AND GROUND FAILURE Findings Ground Shaking 1. The ability of a structure to resist earthquakes is greatly influenced *An active trace is defined as a trace which disturbs geologic units of Down or inferred Holocene age. A-16 00218 by the ground conditions at the site. Historically, structures which have been built on swampy, continually wet, unconsolidated sediments; non-engineered fill; and landslide deposits have sustained severe levels of damage during earthquakes. 2. The effect of local geologic conditions on earthquake waves appears to be strongly influenced by the degree of water saturation. In areas where the water table occurs at depths of approximately 20 feet or greater, there is no reason to expect severe amplification of ground motion. However, it should also be recognized that during the rainy winter months the water table is effectively raised to the surface in many local areas. 3. Based on comparison of a number of seismograph records from "bedrock" and "firm alluvial" sites in California, there appears to be little reason to anticipate significantly more intense shaking on sites under- lain by firm, dry, alluvium. There will be some systematic differences in the characteristics of the ground motion (e.g., predominant period will be relatively longer in alluvial areas; accelerations and displace- ments tend to be relatively higher in alluvial areas). Any of these differences may affect the structural design of sophisticated structures. Ground Failure: Liquefaction ! 1. Catastrophic failures in recent earthquakes have provided a sobering reminder that liquefaction poses a major threat to the safety of en- gineered structures. Major landslides, settling and tilting of buildings on level ground, and failure of water retaining structures have all been observed in recent years as a result of this type of ground failure. 2. Within the Bay Area, abundant evidence of slope failure attributable to liquefaction can be seen in photographs taken after the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. It should be emphasized that: (1) great earth- quakes anywhere in the Bay Area are capable of triggering liquefaction in Contra Costa County, and (2) in many instances it is possible to eval- uate the liquefaction potential of granular material rather inexpensively. 3. Historically, ground failure in its various forms, including liquefaction, has been a problem in areas of continually wet, unconsolidated geologic units. In Contra Costa County the areas which are most susceptible to ground failure include the geologically young sediments of the San Francisco Bay estuary, including the Delta lowlands. Non-engineered fill and land- slide depostis are also potentially hazardous under earthquake conditions. 4. Within the area of continually wet unconsolidated deposits (Zone IV) , the degree of seismic risk is closely related to local ground conditions. A site underlain by a great thickness of potentially unstable material (soft, compressive muds and loose, clay-free sands, etc.) is extremely hazardous. It should be recognized that such a site has a very limited development potential. Conversely, a site underlain by a minimum thickness of soft sA-17 40219 .y 4 muds possesses a much better development potential. Utilizing exis- ting knowledge of foundation engineering, such a site could be made suitable for a variety of land uses. Ground Failure: Landslides 1. Landslides, rock falls, avalanches, mud and debris flows, and general gravitational movements of loose and weathered rock and soil are a ser- ious obstacle to urbanization of hillsides in Contra Costa County. More- over, the seismic history of the San Francisco Bay Area indicates that slope failures of all types are major effects of ground shaking in mod- erate to great earthquakes. 2. Most engineering geology reports submitted to Contra Costa County in be- half of private development projects recognize that hillsides of the Orinda Formation and related formations are prone to landsliding. In relatively steep slopes, and in sheared or deeply weathered material, long term stability is difficult to achieve, even if extraordinary and expensive precautions are incorporated into site grading and drainage designs. 3. In recent years a number of jurisdictions in Southern California have required engineering geology reports for public and private projects in areas of known geologic hazard. These investigations, along with the development regulations of these jurisdictions, have been remarkably successful in reducing the year-to-year dollar loss due to landslides and they provide a higher degree of seismic safety. 4. It should be evict that technical review of land use proposals is critical to achieving effective compliance with regulations requiring geologic reports. S. A principal cause for concern in developing hillside areas is that, al- though individual structures may be sited safely, roads and other public service facilities seldom can completely bypass unstable areas. These long term costs may be great and generally must be borne by the community as a whole rather than the developer. Policies: Ground Shaking, Ground Failure, and Landsliding 1. The County General Plan and its component area plans should recognize local ground conditions as a primary determinant of land use. Within the area of highest damage susceptibility (Rap Zone Iv) land uses not involving substantial human occupancy should be given a high priority. Whenever practical the General Plan should discourage urban or suburban development in Zone IV. Parallel recommendations apply to areas under- lain by deposits classified as having a high liquefaction potential and hillsides classified as possessing a high landslide susceptibility. A-18 091220 2. To the extent practicable critical facilities, structures involving high occupancies and public facilities should not be sited in areas of highest damage susceptibility (Map Zone Il). Where it is deemed essential to do so for the public welfare, these structures should be sited, designed and constructed with due consideration for the po- tential for earthquake damage due to ground shaking, associated ground deformation, and seismically-triggered flooding. Parallel recommenda- tions apply to areas underlain by deposits classified as having a high liquefaction potential and hillsides classified as possessing a high landslide susceptibility. 3. In exercise of its responsibility to provide for the public safety in areas which are considered potentially hazardous in the event of an earthquake, approvals for public and private development projects should be contingent on geologic and engineering studies which define and delin- eate potentially hazardous geologic and/or soils conditions and recommend means of mitigating these adverse conditions. Recommendations 1. Contra Costa County, through its Planning Department should prepare an administrative map series delineating areas which may be hazardous during earthquakes. The proposed map series could be presented in the form of a • Ground Response Map (Seismic Susceptibility Map), Liquefaction Potential Map and Landslide Susceptibility Map. Preferably this.mapping should be done on a countywide basis and at a scale of 1 inch = 2000 feet. The U.S.G.S. topographic quadrangle maps would map an ideal base of this information. 2. The proposed maps in Recommendation 1 and the policies for their use should be adopted by the County, preferably as part of its General Plan (in the Seismic Safety Element or special General Plan Supplement). 3. The conditions of adoption should provide for periodic updating and re- vision of maps which delineate potentially hazardous areas. A procedure should be developed to provide for technical review of proposed changes prior to any formal adoption by the County. 4. The conditions accompanying the adoption of the proposed map series should direct that it be considered in the planning of improvements by all agen- cies under the purview of the Board of Supervisors. S. The conditions accompanying the adoption of the proposed map series should direct that it be considered in project reviews performed by County agencies including Environmental Impact Reports, mandatory referrals (1165402" reviews) and regional clearinghouse reviews. These reviews pertain to private projects and the projects of other levels of government as well as County projects. S 6. The conditions accompanying the adoption of the proposed map series should direct that County agencies consider the map in their adminis- tration of development regulations, including the zoning and subdivision ordinances. . , A-19 00221 7. The subdivision and zoning ordinances should be amended so that they specify that geologic, soil, and seismic safety factors are to be taken into account during project review and that appropriate geologic and/or soils investigations can be required in areas considered to be potentially hazardous. Standards for required reports should reflect awareness of the hazard as well as the nature of the project. As noted earlier in this report, requirements for geologic and/or soils investigations and reports, could be staged or phased, depending on the circumstances. S. Required reports should be given technical review to ensure that the scope and direction of the investigation is appropriate for the nature of the project and its geologic setting. FLOODING AND SEISMICITY Findings Delta Levees 1. Much of the Delta area is underlain by an irregular blanket of sponge- like peat, composed of decaying organic matter. The adverse engineering characteristics of this material include high water content, low shear strength, high compressibility, low bearing strength and high combusti- bility. Even with modern technology the Delta peat places severe limita- • tions on levee design, construction and maintenance. 2. The Delta peat is very hazardous seismically. Historic evidence of dam- age as well as field measurements of ground motion at low strain levels suggest that areas underlain by peat and other materials of similar en- gineering characteristics may experience an incremental increase in inten- sity as high as 2 to 3-1/2 Modified Mercalli Units compared with hard bed- rock. Additionally, fine-grained sand bodies which are interbedded with and underlie the peat are also susceptible to shaking and some of these sands have a high liquefaction potential. 3. The California Department of Water Resources recognizes a three-fold classification of levees: (a) flood control project levees (engineered structures maintained to federal standards); (b) direct agreement levees (repaired by the Corps of Engineers following major breaks and maintained to federal standards); and, (c) non-project levees (non-engineered struc- tures which are not forced to meet absolute standards of safety or per- formance). Within Contra Costa County there are no flood control project levees and the only direct agreement levees are those on islands which form the southern boundary of the San Joaquin River (including part of the levee which encompasses Jersey Island and all of the levees encompassing Bradford and Webb Tracts) . 'thus an estimated 80-90 percent of the Delta levees of Contra Costa County are non-project levees. A-20 OOP-22 • a 1 •o r, Mom"'mwm 4. The non-project levees are sub-standard and do not provide an adequate level of public safety from flooding. Specifically, these levees are non-engineered structures, are not stabilized, and are non-uniform in cross-section. The vulnerability of the levees to being overtopped is well illustrated by events of mid-January, 1973. According to the Contra Costa County Office of Emergency Services, levees were overtopped or within a few inches of being overtopped on at least five islands in the County. Additionally, all islands are subject to inundation as a result of levee failure. Although the mechanism of failure is variable, the collapse of a segment of levee is commonly related to the adverse engineering characteristics of the peaty soils. S. All Delta levees are constructed and maintained solely for the purpose of flood control. There are no standards against which the level of seismic risk is judged and there has been no assessment of the probable effects of seismic loading on the levees or the underlying peat. The present level of seismic risk in the Delta islands is the highest in history. Through the years investments have grown, the life loss poten- tial has increased and the stability of the levees has decreased. Avail- able information strongly indicates that the entire levee system is vul- nerable to failure during a severe earthquake, and that the potential hazard posed by earthquakes is greatest during periods of high water level in the Delta--when levees are under high stress. Dams 1. Major dams are the most critical structures in Contra Costa County in terms of potential life loss. Seismic concerns should be an overriding consideration in the inundation area below dams of questionable seismic response characteristics. 2. The California Division of Safety of Dams within the Department of Water Resources has jurisdiction over the twenty-two largest dams in Contra Costa County. The DSD has broad powers over dams and reservoirs to en- sure that they provide adequate standards of public safety. After the near catastrophic failure of a hydraulic fill dam during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake (the crestal elevation of the dam dropped 18 feet during the 6 to 8 seconds of strong ground shaking), the DSD required owners of hydraulic fill dams to conduct studies of the effect of seis- mic loading on their structures. Late in 1972 East Bay Municipal Util- ity District submitted a report to the regulatory agency on the seismic response characteristics of San Pablo Dam, the only hydraulic fill struc- ture in Contra Costa County. The report is presently being reviewed by the Division of Safety of Dams, who will make a judgment as to the ade- quacy of the study which was undertaken and the soundness of its con- clusions. 3. Under earthquake conditions it appears reasonable to anticipate extensive slumping, cracking, fissuring, and fragmentation of the embankments of A-21 001<2.3 a number of non-engineered, small, earthen dams in the County. The lack of both foundation preparation and engineering embankment con- struction makes many of these structures highly susceptible to damage and failure. Tsunamis 1. Nineteen tsunamis have been recorded at the Golden Gate Tide Gage during the period 1868-1968. During this period maximum nave height recorded at the Golden Gate was 7.4 feet. 2. As inferred from the 1960 and 1964 tsunamis in San Francisco Bay, tsunami waves are attenuated by 50% at the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge tide gage and the waves are completely dissipated as they reach the Carquinez Strait. S. The greatest threat frau tsunami inundation in Contra Costa County appears to be in the Richmond harbor area, where runup extends beyond the 10 foot topographic contour for a tsunami having a 20 foot wave height at the Golden Gate. 4. Historically, the greatest hazard posed by tsunami waves in San Francisco Bay has been from swift currents. In the past, tsunami-generated currents have damaged moored boats and marinas, and these currents are also a threat to people engaged in shoreline recreation activities and harbor traffic. This points up the need to have an adequate warning system. Policies Delta Levees 1. Owing to the extremely high degree of seismic risk, very thorough review should be given to future growth and development in the Delta lowlands (the area subject to inundation in the event of levee failure) . 2. Agricultural and other land uses not involving substantial human occu- pancy should-be specified for areas of exceptionally high seismic hazard, such as the Delta islands. 3. To ensure that seismic risk does not exceed acceptable levels, require soils and geologic hazard reports on development projects. Such reports should assess the stability and dynamic response of the levees, the underlying soils and the consequence of failure. Dams 1. Stringent controls should be applied to all land use in areas downstream from or protected by water-retaining structures that are substandard or questionable with respect to their dynamic response characteristics, or that lie within an active fault zone or where the potential for massive • landsliding into the reservoir exists. A-22 09224 2 In fulfilling its role of promoting seismic safety, the General Plan should give appropriate consideration to seismic safety factors in the potential area below major dans. T r i 3. To ensure that seismic risk does not exceed acceptable levels, require soils and geologic hazard reports on development should assess the stabilityand projects. Such reports underlying soils and the consequence of faiiluree of the levees, the Dams 1. Stringent controls should be applied to all land use in areas downstream from or protected by water-retaining structures that are substandard or questionable with respect to their dynamic response characteristics, or that lie within an active fault zone or where the potential for massive landsliding into the reservoir exists. A_22 09224 2. In fulfilling its role of promoting seismic safety, the General Plan should give appropriate consideration to seismic safety factors in the potential area below major dams. Tsunamis 1. Structures for human occupancy, and particularly critical structures, and potentially dangerous commercial or industrial facilities (e.g-, plants for the manufacture or storage of explosive, flammable or toxic materials) must be protected against tsunami hazard. Recommendations Delta Levees 1. Restrict land uses to those that are economically essential and notify owners, builders, and occupants of areas subject to inundation of the hazard. 2. Specify that open space land use is an appropriate devise for areas of exceptionally high seismic hazard, such as the Delta islands. 3. To ensure that seismic risk does not exceed acceptable levels, require soils and geologic hazard reports on all land transactions subject to public review. Such reports should assess the stability and dynamic response of the levees, the underlying soils, and the consequence of failure. Dams 1. Land use planning and regulations downstream from dams of questionable seismic response might include: 2. Restricting land use to those that are economically essential and warning owners, builders, and occupants of areas subject to inundation of the hazard. 3. Where economically feasible, and without encouraging a false sense of security, constructing restraining or diversion structures to limit the inundation potential. 4. Instituting an appropriate communication system to warn of impending failure. S. Adopting and implementing evacuation plans. 6. It is recommended that the County adopt an ordinance regulating the design and construction of dams not under the jurisdiction of the state. Such an ordinance might be modeled after ordinances adopted by other Bay Area counties. �f A-23 0022-5 r • Tsunamis 1. Although no devastating tsunami has been recorded in San Francisco Bay, and the likelihood of one may be small, the possibility still exists. where safety is critically important, and particularly in the Richmond harbor area, further detailed study of tsunami hazard prior to development of such structures is advisable. Additional restriction does not seem warranted at this time. STRUCTURAL SAFETY AND RISK Findings 1. Anyone who lives or builds in Contra Costa County necessarily assumes seismic risk. The County, together with most of the Bay Area, is in a region of high seismicity. 2. The level or risk to persons or to property may not be adequately per- ceived since most of the County's or the Bay Area's population was born or moved here subsequent to the last major earthquake. 3. Considerations of cost and practicality aside, our technology enables us to reduce the loss of life or exposure to severe injury from seismic causes, but probably not the risk of severe and widespread damage to struc- ture and property. 0 4. Considerations of economics, institutional capabilities (law, citizen ac- ceptance, etc.), and technological impracticalities appear to preclude the full use of our technological capabilities to mitigate risk in the short-run. Now and for some time in the future, the extent of seismic protection the County's citizens will enjoy largely depends on what they will accept, and partially on what they can afford. S. There is a need for the revision and strengthening of the existing building codes as a means of improving design provisions for seismic safety. Dam- age to structures and facilities during recent earthquakes suggest several specific areas that require attention. 6. Damage to high-rise buildings during recent earthquakes indicates that evacuation of a weakened structure prior to the occurrence of a severe aftershock:, panic and/or fire, or the creation of a safe environment within the building is extremely important, particularly since parts of some of these buildings are beyond the reach of emergency equipment. 7. The performance of freeway overpasses during the San Fernando earthquake was clearly unsatisfactory. This points out the need for the State to perform a structural study of freeway overpasses in the County and rein- force those found to have structural deficiencies. 8. Seismic safety of existing non-conformin structures should be evaluated in terms of (a) site location with respect to known or potential geologic i () A-24 112R hazards (the hazard maps accompanying the Seismic Safety Element will be suitable for this purpose), (b) use or occupancy of the structure, (c) ability of the structure to resist earthquakes, and (d) life of the structure. 9. Little progress is being made on the greatest of existing hazards con- fronting Californians: The thousands of collapse-hazard older buildings in which people live and work. An implementation program should concen- trate on older buildings (pre-1933) and buildings sited in potentially hazardous settings. 10. The next severe Bay Area earthquake will provide engineers, geologists, planners and seismologists with a great amount of information on the performance of slopes, various types of ground and structures throughout Contra Costa County. Policies 1. The County's primary seismic safety goal should be the protection of the lives of everyone present in its jurisdiction in the event of an earth- quake. 2. The County's secondary goals, in order of priority, should be to protect people from serious injury, to ensure that necessary services are pro- vided, and to ensure that economic and physical recovery are rapid. 3. The County should give first emphasis to ensure that new construction, projects, and developments conform to its seismic safety goals. 4. The County should give next emphasis to the mitigation of existing hazard- ous buildings and conditions in accordance with the order of priority and its goals, and in keeping with its resources to diminish hazards. 5. Every structure in Contra Costa County should be designed and constructed so as to ensure that acceptable levels of seismic risk will be achieved. 6. Every high-rise building should be designed and constructed to provide for the evacuation of occupants and/or for the creation of a safe environ- ment in case of a substantial disaster, such as a severe earthquake or fire. 7. Every hazardous structure in Contra Costa County should be identified, particularly critical facilities. S. It should be the expressed policy of Contra Costa County to see that collapse-hazard buildings, and particularly public facilities, be recon- structed to provide an adequate level of public safety or be abated through reasonable, but effective, means. • 9. After a severe earthquake, it should be the expressed policy of Contra Costa County to see that scientific information is fully utilized to a-2S 227 guide reconstruction and redevelopment plans in heavily damaged • areas. n ' - 16L,.a1 _.L.1 1-L-1/s uL.L�,u Lu piuvide for the evacuation of occupants and/or for the creation of a safe environ- ment in case of a substantial disaster, such as a severe earthquake or fire. 7. Every hazardous structure in Contra Costa County should be identified, particularly critical facilities. S. It should be the expressed policy of Contra Costa County to see that collapse-hazard buildings, and particularly public facilities, be recon- structed to provide an adequate level of public safety or be abated through reasonable, but effective, means. • 9. After a severe earthquake, it should be the expressed policy of Contra Costa County to see that scientific information is fully utilized to A-2S 00227 guide reconstruction and redevelopment plans in heavily damaged areas. Recommendations* 1. The "Scale of Acceptable Risk" (Table 9) should be included in the Seismic Safety Element, for adoption, as a basis for administrative direction in carrying out the seismic safety goals as they pertain to structures. 2. It appears appropriate to adopt interim building standards that will provide a higher level of seismic safety for the public without imposing an undue hardship on developers. The 1933 Field Act, which governs school design in California, illustrates the effectiveness found in code revisions related to seismic safety and disaster preparedness. Consequently, the Board of Supervisors should direct the Building Inspec- tion Department at its discretion, to make recommendations for the revi- sion and amelioration of the existing building codes as a means of im- proving design provisions necessary for seismic safety. 3. Require that all designs for high-rise buildings include either an accept- able plan and procedure for the evacuation of occupants and/or the crea- tion of a safe environment within the building for the occupants. Such plans and procedures are to be approved by appropriate agencies of county government prior to the filing of the drawings for the purpose of obtain- ing a building permit and shall be maintained as a public record for each, building, to be referred to in cases of emergency. 4. A survey of buildings is needed to evaluate structural hazards and to institute a program to correct them. Because California may create an Earthquake Commission which probably would establish criteria for such a survey, it is recommended that the County wait a reasonable time L2 years following Seismic Safety Element adoption) for the State criteria before initiating a program of its own. If no State program is available after two years, the County Planning Department should recommend one. S. It is recommended that the County obtain structural engineering services to investigate the design and construction of existing structures. As a practical first step in identifying hazardous structures, it is suggested that this program begin with a survey of building types that are known to be the most hazardous in areas where the potential hazard from ground rup- ture, ground shaking or slope failure is greatest. Additionally, certain critical structures and faciliti4:s should be investigated to determine if they would remain functional after undergoing severe ground shaking. These critical structures should include hospitals, fire houses, police facilities, disaster response coordination center and it's communications network and freeway interchanges. *The policies and recommendations of other chapters also deal with the • mitigation of risk. " A-26 -Z<, 6. Ordinances should be enacted that would require amortization and even- tual removal of non-conforming structures in the greatest danger, star- ting with those that endanger the greatest number of lives such as schools, hospitals, office buildings, apartment buidings, and auditoriums. Phasing out of older buildings through redevelopment might be a practical means of reducing injuries and loss of life in future earthquakes. 7. Abatement ordinances for all types of hazardous buildings should proceed on a relative safety basis, weighing life loss potential against economic and social considerations. S. The General Plan should provide for changes in circumstance that would follow a substantial disaster. Final judgments on land use in heavily damaged areas should be based on scientific knowledge of the risks in- volved and consequence of failure. 9. Contra Costa County, through its Building Inspection Department, should develop an administrative map series portraying spectral acceleration and spectral ground periods for at least those portions of the County where high occupancy and critical structures are concentrated. These maps could be used in the administration of building regulations. Spec- ifically, the proposed map series would provide a framework for evalua- ting the compatibility of local ground conditions with the structural design of important structures. 10. Contra Costa County, through its Planning and Building Inspection Depart- ments, should provide for technical review of all required geologic and related engineering reports. 11. Provision should be made for review of the structural safety aspects of the Seismic Safety Element after two years. This review should give special attention to new information. It should also focus on the effectiveness of the implementation program. CRITICAL STRUCTURES Findings 1. The Field Act was placed in the statutes by the California Legislature shortly after the collapse of a school building in the 1933 Long Beach earthquake. This act places the construction of public school buildings under the supervision of the State for the protection of property and life. 2. The Field Act did not include a geologic siting requirement until 1967. Consequently, some pre-1967 Field Act schools in the County may be sited in areas of unstable ground; others are on or immediately adjacent to active faults. 3. The success of "specialized" building standards coupled with competent geologic site analysis is illustrated by the California experience that A-27 of A29 no school built under the Field Act has failed during California earth- quakes. Conversely, even a low to moderate magnitude earthquake is capable of producing severe damage to a school building which possesses important structural deficiencies. 4. Most of the hospitals in the County are modern structures which have had the provisions of the Uniform Building Code. However, there are some hospitals which appear to be sited on or very near the traces of active faults. Additionally, there are some older structures whose ability to resist earthquake shaking needs to be investigated. S. Massive damage (including partial collapse) to hospitals during the 1971 San Fernando earthquake has led the California State Legislature to en- act a statute which places the construction of hospitals under the super- vision of the State, including both new hospitals and additions or re- modeling to existing structures. 6. As long linear elements, it is generally not possible for highways and public service utilities to avoid hazardous areas. Nevertheless, crossings of faults and unstable ground should be minimized. 7. Because of their design and construction, many freeway bridges are vuI- nerable to total or partial collapse as a result of strong ground shaking. Additionally, interchanges which are sited in areas prone to Iandsliding, liquefaction or other types of ground failure are exposed to additional risk from these factors. 8. !Massive damage to the water supply and sewer systems is an expectable consequence of a severe earthquake. Most of the destruction in the 1906 San Francisco earthquake resulted from fires that could not be controlled because of shattered water mains. Most recently, the 1971 San Fernando earthquake produced such extensive damage as to practically require a completely new water system for the City of San Fernando. 9. Structures for the distribution of electricity which are sited on faults or unstable ground are susceptible to extensive damage. However, well sited structures have performed well during recent California earthquakes. It should be recognized that transmission lines and their supporting towers must cross areas of questionable stability and therefore are sub- ject to disruption. Policies 1. Decisions of the location of critical structures and facilities should be based on a thorough consideration of all factors, including need for the facility, suitability, of the site for the typc of land use proposed, availability of alternative sites, etc. Final decisions should be based on knowledge of the ri-.ks involved and the consequences of failure. 2. Critical structures and facilities should not be located in "high-risk" areas. However, where it is in the overriding public interest to locate A-28 00230 I critical facilities in these areas, special precautions should be taken to enable those facilities to withstand anticipated hazards. In particular, the County of Contra Costa should not locate critical facilities under its jurisdiction in "high-risk" areas. All public agency high-occupancy and critical structures should be reviewed by the Planning Agency relative to seismic safety in the course of "man- datory referral" reviews. Recommendations 1. Professional soils and geologic-seismic investigations should be required for all critical facilities and high occupancy structures. Soils reports should be prepared or approved by a registered civil engineer speciali- zing in soils engineering; geologic-seismic reports should be prepared or approved by a registered geologist specializing in engineering geo- logy. Final subdivision maps should reference soils and geologic-seismic reports and the final map should be signed by the professional soils engineers and geologists who prepared or approved the reports. 2. Project reviews performed by County agencies, either reports prepared for County projects or the review of other agencies' projects, should address seismic safety and the adequacy of seismic safety information for performing these reviews. 3. The County Zoning Ordinance should be reviewed and amended if necessary, to require site plan reviews for all private high-occupancy structures and critical facilities. 4. In cooperation with other jurisdictions and departments, the facilities indicated in this chapter should be individually reviewed for their seis- mic safety by a licensed structural engineer. A-29 00231 Modified Mercolli Intensity 1 Approximate Richter Approximate Peak Magnitude Corresponding Horizontal Acceleration to Highest Intensity Reached II (a max/9) 3 .008 • 111 4 IV .01 V .05 5 ............................V1. ....................... VII 6 VI11 .1 IX .5 7— X g XI XII 1.0 APPENDIX B EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENT CORRELATION Approximate relationship of Modified Mercalli Intensity to Richter magnitude and peak horizontal acceleration. (modified after Holmes, 1965, p.901) For example, an earthquake having a Richter magnitude of 5.0 would be expected to have a maximum intensity of VI on the Modified Mercalli Scale. The approx- imate peak horizontal acceleration for such an event would be less than .085. B-1 11!1232 ss� r -1 l EXHIBIT B . i • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ TO: Andrew H. Young, Chairman ATE: October 21, 1975 Contra Costa County Planning Commission FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: Staff Responses to Director of Planni Seismic Safety Element- Testimony , Attached, are copies of written materials submitted in testimony at the public hearings on the Seismic Safety Element together with our department's replies. Our written replies follow the submittals in each case. . the submittals with responses are: 1. Seismic Safety Advisory Review Panel (Charles L. Taylor) 2. Associated Building Industry 3. Building Code Action (submitted with above) 4. Bernard B. Gordon (Woodward-Clyde Letterhead) 5. Rodney G. Huppi (Hotel Letterhead) 6. Burton H. Marliave 7. California Department of Transportation 8. East Bay Municipal Utility District 9. Seismic Safety Advisory Review Panel (Charles L. Taylor and Frank E. McClure). Also attached is a copy of a communication from the Associated Building Industry, dated October 14, 1975, which covers their testimony at the previous hearing. This arrived after our responses were prepared but it includes items #2 and 103, above, which were addressed. No additional action is needed. RECEIVE 4- r,A sSuUpP OCT4 f 1975 AAD/bp s• LV" Attachments ae � A Co, _4, � - �.,. , + w1111 boord order 0 00233 t, 1975 T gliair,a:�n IINIE: Uc;tobrr ? , . Can t t 3 Cum to Coup ty I'la,e„ i ug Cou,cuissuu -, ,loi• S okcsms,� SUBJL'rr: P.,nc t Rucommcnda- l�l:ODI. Char lcs *.r.t P •:. L i uns un Sc i!;1111C RECEIVED Agp�bp OCT411975 Attachments �• '�°LssON • aM K ION D of SA OISOM Miero.e�� + -.Z-- wain, booed ordertG.. ylo. PrI1033 (YJ233 TO: Andrew Il. Young, Chairman U.-UH: October 7, 1975 Con L ra Costa County Planning. i Commission FROM: Charles Taylor, Spokesman SUBJECT: Pallet Recommend.- Seismie Safety Advisory ~j• •�,;•;;, '�. • tions oil Seis is Review Panel S:ircLy tilemeat - to Revisions 4eii11**A t.:i itis .=°.,t •' In accordance: with the directions we requested from your Commission at the September 16, 197S, hearing on the -Seismic Safety H.Iament, the !'landing* Staff met with our Panel on September 24th :laid again on September 29th to discuss the specific concerns •we' -had on the Element Hearing Draft. Our Panel reached a consensus oil the; recom- me:ndations listed below and the Planning Starr agreed to prepare them in memorandum form for the hearing touifht. f was setectud to present the memorandum to you and to act as spokesman for the Panel. , SPL•CIAL- RE-d >111►1L•NUAT1OSS Before enumerating; the several specific e•li:,ng;e:: we be i i evee sbnla i li be made to Lite: report, 1 would Me to Call your attoeetiun Lo Lau items we -feel need special attention. 1. first and foremost, tiro believe that the Seismic Safety - Administration Rcview Panel (p. 62) . is critical to the: successful ;administration of seismic surety requirements in Contra Costs County. This is because the proper review of some projects requires the collective judgment of _ seismically-knowledgeable representatives of- several pro- fessions. We recommend, that Lhe Ptaunin- Commission call the Board of Supervisors' attention to the need for this panel in your resolution aCopting the Seismic Safety Element. 2. No believe that the Seismic Safety lilement mould be better understood by all and certainly be much more useable by , the professions and industries affected by it if its main text was preceded by a "highlights"' section .listing key recommendations and policies. manning, Starf indicates that it could prepare such a section from materiels provided by the Panel but not necessarily in time for the: Commission's adopiion or the; newe,•nt. Sine:e: the• see:Lion wnuld e:uutain, ituthina idew, it could lie aJJad by the Board of Supervisors later. Accordingly, we recommend that you direct st:eff to prepare a hightig;hts section and introduce it into the adoption proccedin--scos as soon as practicable. 00234 Mr. Young -?- Oct. 7, 1975 GiiNERAL R1:CORNliihlllTtONS some of our reeoutmendatious are of a general iiature and pertain to the report ;is a whole rather than to particular pages ; thuse are: 1. General ' The text of the Element should more clearly ackiicniledgc that much can be dolte to mitigate potentially ha=ardous condition-,-. Tile Advisory Paiiel is in full support of policy -statements and proposals for changes in ordinances which Would provide. for cotlsideratiou of seismic safety factors duriit- Lite project review phase of the developmcut process_ Policies :licd regula- tions rc(leiiring studies should be flexible , however, providing for the exercise of professional judgment. 2. General - _ S. The Advisory Panel supports policy. statements (which Judicate that geolo is and/or soils ciloincer.i ig invest igat iotis should be requ i red i.it a re as f ut lij to he pu t e ik L i;t l l y It;t;:a t"cl-itt:; l v—g , - third paragraph oil page Sit) . 3. General Tile Advisory panel supports and wishes to call tic -Planning Contmissioil- s attention to the L'lemcnt-s discussion of the importance of inscrtiug mechanisms into the l:citcral plan t:ltick swill go into effect in a post-earthquake period to provide ;1 framework for reconstruction and redcvelopmctit pl:tllilitic; in the aftermath of a. destructive earthquake (pages 48 and 49) . The Element' s complementary provision that Arca pl.itls should give appropriate consideration to reconstruction and redevelop- went plannitll in such circumstances is important and needs to be implemented. 4. Several Tables 'file faacl is concerned that some users of tilt: Nemcut may atteugtt to apply Lite criteria in its tables without adequarc reference to clital 1 f i cat toles in the texL., Lhut'Cforv , the hath? t recotlilutmids that 1,11r legend of all tables in the Elemc•ut should contain a statement of limitations, modeled after . the state- ment which appears on maps. e " OU235 Mr. Youuo -3- Oct. 7, 1975 5. General The text of Lite lilemcnt should be edited before its .final publication to eliminate several typographic and compositional. errors. To avoid confusion , terms which have a strict techni- cal meatting, should be defint:d in tite text. In some instances _ tecltttical terms were used in a lay sense. Careful editing; of the Element should eliminate confusions, without impairing readability. Since meaning will not be changed, sraff ought . to be able to perform this editing under general I'I:uueitt;; Cottuuission direction. Tho 'Advisory Patte1 is furnishing staff its suggestions for editing. SPECIFIC IUiCO3MMIXIDAVOINS lCecomandations that pertain more to a particular section or page are: 1. Pates 726-8 The Advisory Panel believes that the text now entitled ' Design Earthquakes should lie retitled "Partheittake I':tr:tmcrcr:;" Mid revised to make it clearer 1,11al it i:: iuivittittJ to provible scicutific information oil earLhclu:tl:cs alld not. to spcCi f! ,design criteria for structures. Similarly, T;sble 5 should � be retitled.- 2.- etitled:2.' Pmts 19-20; 29 , and 31 The titles of Maps 2, 3 and -i should be reviscd to. more _ accurately describe the geologic information which is plotted. Specifically, the title of Map 2 should be changed to "Mapped Faults." Similarly , the title of 'fable 3 'should be modified to "Selected f=aults." 3. Pages 34-40 The Advisory i'ancl feels that the Element, unlike the Technical llackgrouud Report, does not clearly differentiate betr:ecct large Jams (teltich are rerutaLea by Lite SLate of California) and smaller dams. The Panel feels that the file:mettt Should clearly recognize tltat the state agency having attthor.it} over• 1:11-go talks its Lite Conti t y has de nlod that cutis of these: f:tc:il.itics prc�ticic� :tit adetlu:tte lc:t'c1 of public s:tfuty_ With regard to smaller dams , the Panel feels that their safety is not primarily a seismic safety matter. Failure is more commottly s 00236 'Nr. Young -A- Oct. 7, .1975A a resul t oT inadequate: spillway capacity, or lack of maintenance after construction. nevertheless , the Panel docs support the recommendations of the Element which call for regulation of squall dams. d. Page 43, Following . The definition of "critical structures" which appears in the Technical Background Report should be included in the Element report; without it, the discussion is hard to follow. S. Pa es 46-7 The Advisory Panel feels that the Element's discussion of the rule of the building codes and the importance of the building in.pection function in achieving a higher degree of seismic: safety in the County should be str"gthened. In particular, tl:e enaetmeut of the 1976 Uniform -building Cock: amendment governing seismic design should be stressed. 6. Page 60 ThC disctts.sion of "Admittlstrativc Malbti jor 1'1•tijt`t'�_, I�e•tftt`U[::rr is. sotuc;a=1ta L abli nevi a Led. This d i::e us:: i utt :; son l el Ifr. cxl►aetttt:tl to protide more insight into source materials as t{ ll as the; intended tuses and limitations of thcsc maps. Chaps Sltduld he reviewed by' a technical advisory board. 7. Page 61 The Advisory Panel feels that there should be more discussion of the relationship between the Altluist-Priolo Act ;iutd the: implementation of the scismic-safety Element . 'l•hc lz.lement's mention of the Act, in connection with the development of regulations, is abbreviated. _ 8. Page Gd The Advisory Panel wishes to call the County's attention to the: Recd for more secure emergency operations facilities (enter-ency operations center and cotuwunicatiuns) , which are noted ill the ElewettL and previous studies. 9. Page A-4 Finding 11 (middle of page) , Linc 3, delete: "anti potentially active faults." 10 . 1'aic A-S .� Finding ;7, delete: -OFindini;:"- OU23� P: Mr. Young -S- Oct. 7, 1975 . 11. Page A-S Policy 02 , Linc 3, 'dcictc: "or potentially active." 12. Page A-6 Policy 15, Linc 3, delete: "or reasonably suspected. 13. Page A-7 policy .91 , Linc 1, delete: "primary." 14. Page A-7 , - Policy 14 , Line 1, revise to read: "(Zone IV on Map 3) ." 15. fame i.:7 - 1=indinq 82, Line 3, change to: "20 with an opeit Face." -16. I'at:e A 16 hecommendation t9:e, revise to react: `i•ec►1ai6c: and soils i eves t i ga Li on:: should he requ i re:11 for 111 ::eetla i it i: "e erre :18111 plaetl1ed emit developments i.rc areas found to be 11ot•ceeLi:ifly Hazardous. -The standards for site analysis shoceld .rel"16CL the degree of awareness of the -Hazard and the nature of the proposed construction." 17. Page i1- 16 I:ecomucentlation 196, c, revise. to read: "provisions should be ' made to require geologic_ and/or soils investigations for rezonii:gs, arietor subdivisions, dcvc'lopraceet plans, land use permits, and building permits in areas found to be potentially Hazardous--and where warranted by the nature of the application. The standards for site analysis should reflect the degree of awareness of the hazard and the nature arca scale of the proposed developuee;nL." 18. 11a j-oe ?l- I S Policy #1 , Line 3 . reference Map 3. 19. Page A-IS Policy 411 , Linc S . revise to indicate: that there arc uses appropriate to such areas--sowc industries, "for example, need to locate near waterways—and that much can be done to' minimize risk through extraordinary site, foundation and drainage design. Mr. Yoteng -G- Oct. 7, 1975 29. N)pcndi.x ll c � auv LU ttkjullte &Ct110!Je and/or soils lnlvestig.tttons for rczonir:gs, wirtor subdivisions, (leveloptuent lel:urs , land use ially permits, and buildittl; permits in areas fntnlct to be I'o>>Eicatiolt. hazardous--surd where warranted by the nature, of the ;IPPH Tire standards for site analysis should reflect tite degree of ar.,ar•clie ss of tine Itazard and the nature and sc::11e of the prppo.sed dcvelopulellt." A- 1 S Policy #1, Linc 3, reference Map 3- 19. 1' 1 A-IS Policy j1 , I.itte S . revise to indicate that there arc• uses -1pprolrriate to such areas--sourC inditstries, -fur ex:talpie, need to locate near waterw-4-S-31IJ tsitemufl" d;�tbe doltcE to minimize risk through extraordinary cir:tinalc design. ' Mr. Young -G- Oct. 7, 11375 20. A)rlrcndix !; Eliminate this diagram page h-1. 'Tile rule i:; lost alaour the exceptions. ADDITIONAL RECOM ENDATIONS It is the opinion of a majority Of tile Advisory Panel* that the following items receive special considerations. I. Page 15 Paragraph 1, Line 3, delete: •"," after- tcicatt•ci. .1114 :141l „and."" 4, %%-.lit .�/lit`••%=i ��=t:'=ii Xt/f-V;ylr,.l%✓i�'ir-"Q /l . 2 . Pan;c 1S Last paragraph, :told to third sentence: "It is conceivable that any movement. . ."" Delete fourth and fi-fth scutences. 3. Page 21- Paragraph 1, Line 2, period after "Fault 'Trace." Delete rest of line and third line. 4. Page 21 ` Paragraph 4, delete second sentence. �S. 11agc 23 Legend change to "Mapped faults." 6 . Page A-4 " Finding 14, modify to reflect State Alciuist-Priolo definition and delete item 1 (4) . Indicate that active faults can commonly be defined by youthful fault-related topographic features. 7. Pa'.c A-5 Firtdin}; 15 , tnu,li Iy to ret feet State rllcitri:ct-t"ric,Icr tlei`ilcit.iun. 5u.C';L that Lits: (3thel' er'i tcri:t 113V : 11crcu ur.ucl !.0 iticitLify, 1 cults r•.Iritlt may be significant to a project. 8. Page A-5 Policy ;3, modify to reflect State Alquist-l'riola de,•£init:falls_ i 00239 Mr. Young -7- Oct. 1975 . i 9. Page A-5 Policy 14, Line 2, revise to effect ".In an active of potentially active fault zone." 10. Palle A-a _ Policy 12 , Line 2, delete: 11. Pane A- 11 Policy 02, delete policy. 12. Page A- 1.2 Recommendations 1 and 2 delete. 13. Papp 1713 Finding 14 , Line 1, delete: "All," third sentence add "1t is conceivable that any movement _ ."' and delete fourth .and . fifth sentences. 14. Page A-14 Policy 04, delete policy. 15. Page A-22 , Tsunamis - Resolve apparent conflict with 11 - maximum wave height -00- 7.4 eight •01 -7.4 feet, 13-10 ' fout contour tine ruauap at Ri4hawna! *from a 20 foot wave at the Golden Cate:, :and P. 41 (fourth pa"r.a_;raph) which indicates that 7.4 feet may be regarded as a reasonable maximum for future events. 16. Page A-27 Recommendation &9, delete recommendation. f i Charles L. Taylor W240 'Up �- �► .STAFF RESPONSE - , Seismic Safety Recommendations of the-Element's Advisory Review Panel Charles Taylor, Spokesman; October 7, 1975 F; SPECIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ';♦;1 �•Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel. `This-recommendation should" ` t F appear in the highlights section to give it special, emphasis. . `2 Staff concurs with the recommendations of the Panel: GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel and specifically recommends that this philosophy be embodied in "Planning Implications" material now presented in page 16 of the draft Element. _ 2. - Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel. No changes inext_are necessary. - } A`` 3. Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel. No changes in text are r T, necessary_ 4' 4. Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel and recommends the following statement of limitations: Table 1 , No change needed. " +-_:', �,:;�,,Table 2, 3 Add: "This table is generalized from original source ` =: tw. materials_ It is a guide for planning operations, - a� not an -indicator of ground conditions on individual . sites.' Table 4 No change---needed. {, r - _. .=Table 5 Add: The- estimated maximum parameters are intended as estimates-of the maximum earthquake 'characteristics that appear- capable of occurringgiven presentlyknown seismological and geological coditions. It shuld be recognized that (1) the approximations which are pre- sented are for comparative purposes only, (2) there are differences of opinion among professionals on the reliability of such estimates, and- (3) the approxima tions which are presented are not intended as design criteria for structures. , A r - 00-241 tt Aim fw• ,•i n : F - r .'Table 6 See statement of limitations for Table 2. Table 7 Add: "Information on the occurrence and character of surficial deposits is generalized from original source materials. This table is a guide for planning oper- ations, not an indicator of ground conditions on in- sites." f .Table 8 - No change needed. ' t Table 9 .No change needed_ 4 'Table 10 No change needed. ^5._ Staff concurs with the 'recommendation of the Advisory Panel. We,have,, . 's received comments from several members of the Panel and "will make appropriate minor editorial changes prior to publication of the Element_. SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS ' 1. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel (see staff response to item j4 under General Recommendations). 2. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel and recom- ,� mends the following changes: r Map 2 ,Title: "Mapped Faults" •3 yY a; ^` Map 3 Title: "Seismic Susceptibility" Map 4 Title: "Estimated Liquefaction Potential of Clay Free Sands" r` Table 3 Title: "Summary of Available Data on the Activity Status of Selected Faults in Contra Costa County" 3. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel and will revise p 36-41 so that they more closely follow the discussion pre- sented in the Technical Background Report. ' Staff concurs in the recommendation of the Advisory Panel and recon 4. - _ ,. mends that the definition of critical structures which appears on r' page 186 of the Technical Background Report be embodied pn the dis- cussion now -on page 43 of the Seismic Safety Element hearing draft. 5. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel. In view of this recent development, we suggest that the discussion of the County writing interim building code provisions be given less emphasis and that the substance of the following be added to the material now on page 47 of the draft Seismic Safety Element as a footnote or text revision: 002V s 3j 09242� I 4,J t � ' ., , v Y -Man. .. .. mow" -r . +rT^�+-;,cx� "Since the preparation of this section of the Element, the Inter- -­`national nter- -­ national Conference of Building Officials has- prepared the '1976 amendments' to the Uniform Building Code. This package of proposed code revisions addresses some, but not all , of the subjects of con- cern identified by the Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic-Safety. These code revisions should be adopted and enforced as -: soon as possible." Staff also concurs with the Advisory Panel on the importance of the enforcement of existing building code requirements and sdggest " the-following statement be added to the material now on:page 47: It should be recognized that improved codes are essential to achiev= ing a higher degree of seismic safety. However, equally important, ;- •+` if not more important; 'are careful plan checking and.enforcement of existing code standards. In this regard it is pertinent to note that the professional staff of the County Building Inspection Department includes experienced structural_ and grading engineering personnel (who are not typically present in smaller agencies)." 6. -- Staff concurs in the recommendation of the Advisory Panel. This section can be strengthened by adding explanatory matetial from the Technical Background Report_ The text revision will emphasize that the preparation of the administrative maps is largely a compilation of existing source materials. As such they will reflect the findings of the U.S. Geological Survey, the California Division of Mines and Geology, University studies, and studies done for development pro- jects in the County. Aw 7: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel, and as one addition suggests that the discussion on page 61 be expanded as follows: "The Alquist-Priolo Act addresses a special aspect of seismic safety-- the potential for surface fault displacement within designated Special Studies Zones. To date, -the state law has been administered as a matter of policy of the Board of Supervisors. Enacting an ordinance would provide guidance to appl-icants and others by formalizing the County's procedures,for� the-implementation of the state law." - 8: • Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel. leo text changes are needed: _ . 9. Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory "Panel . -- 10. Staff agrees that the finding is- subject to misinterpretation and suggests that it be revised as.follows instead of being deleted: "Energy release events on an active fault may alternate from one trace to another, and movement on a master fault could trigger adjustments on minor, subsidiary faults. Because of these factors, r . 0043 I 17 fault traces which intersect or warrant special consideration durin parallel known active faults 9 project review. Staff concurs with the recommendation. would provJu« ntation or the �Lat-�- ►a-- ' rocedures for the impleme .. .: County's P dation of the Advisory Panel - 8 No text . - Staff concurs w-�th the recommen- . . are needed: - changes .._ :� _-� ._ • _ dation of the Advisory Panel. : '. g. Staff concurs with the recommen that the finding is-subject to misinterpretation and 10. Staff agrees deleted: suggests that it be revised asfolinstead of being "Energy release events on an active fault may alternate from one er trace to another, and movement on aumaster Because of theslt could e factors, adjustments on minor, subsidiary f • _ ,, a,. . j 00243 :" a e w -fault traces which intersect or parallel known active faults warrant special consideration during project review-". 11. ,Staff concurs with the recommendation. AV-, 12.. 'Staff concurs with the recommendation. • �. �. ,~,Staff concurs with the ,recommendation for a text revision. and `suggest the following change in wording: �•�,."In seismically active areas, ground conditions should be.a primary ; _consideration• in the selection of land use and in the design of k S developments." 3 � M Staff concurs-with the recommendation of the Advisory .Panel . ' 15 Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel. L `. 16 17 .,Staff concurs with the Advisory Panel. However, staff would like ""to see the recommendations combined and the language simplified: +"Provisions should be made to require geologic and/or soils investi- =� = ` -gations in areas found to be potentially hazardous. Ordinances and -�. �regulations requiring studies should be flexible, allowing for the ""exercise of professional judgment.' The standards for site analysis _should reflect the degree of awareness of the hazard and the nature d scale of the proposed development. Depending on circumstances, ' -the requirement for reports could be phased or staged, with an ini- tial requirement for a reconnaissance report to be followed by a geo- logic hazards report or a preliminary soils report, where appropriate. >} , (The purpose of the reconnaissance report is to identify areas that may require special management and to recommend an exploration pro- , xti -gram to define and delineate any geologic hazard or potentially haz- �:,.; -'ardous soil condition. The purpose of the subsequent studies, where needed, is to accurately identifydevelopable areas and to .recommend ;means of mitigating potentially azardous conditions.) �� " �• 18 Staff concurswith the recommendation of the Advisory Panel_ ` 19 Staff concurs with the recommendation. The Panel 's wording should ,'be added to the policy statement. = , > Y: 20 •Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Panel. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ~ i.- .'-Staff agrees with the recommended change. 2. .+Staff agrees with the substance of the recommendation but suggests w1 -.the following modification: ' T . 00244 - 0024 �wf t - -i I Y D . o 0 7-1,111 D D Z_A17- ,47-1 .4 C T ORX T lq 017025121 r 0 is o�- . L G sf: :r apt x"_r.k,u RrA Af,> .> rp, iso ^` � ' i t� ' � yj� ,,n-• .- ; °Fr' i :, +ate--y R- q. -n `..� , "It is conceivable that movement on the master fault could trigger adjustments on minor cross faults or adjacent subparallel faults. , It should also be noted that the engineering character of the r.r• crushed material in the fault zone may effect foundation and drain- age design." Staff agrees with the substance of the recommendation but suggest :.tea the following revision: - "...fault trace. However, even inactive faults should be given con- : sideration in the review of proposed projects." " 4 :µStaff agrees with the recommended change. _ 5: .; Staff agrees wi th the _recommended change. - 6. Staff agrees with the recommended change and suggests the following Y wording: y K "Faults which have had surface displacement within Holocene time •. (about the last 11,000 years) may be considered active. Evidence of active faulting may include any of the following: (1) historic earthquake accompanied by surface faulting, (2) tectonic creep, and (3) fault offset involving deposits of known or inferred Holocene age. 7-' Staff agrees with the recommended change and suggests the following w : wording.- "Faults ording:"Faults which have had surface displacement within the Quaternary Period (about the last 2 or 3 million years) may be considered potentially active. - Evidence for a potentially active fault is: fault offset involving deposits of known or inferred Quaternary age... . . ,,:_** "Alignment of earthquake epicenters along a fault trace is an-indi- cator of activity but one which is generally considered to be less compelling than proven Quaternary offset. Similarly, a permeability F. barrier in Quaternary deposits,. a prominent air-photo lineation in Quaternary deposits, a.fault--trace defined by youthful fault related topographic features, or a fault trace which closely coincides with the epicentral area of a major historic earthquake are considered to be less. certain evidence than proven Quaternary rupture. These and other criteria have been used.to -identify faults which may be sig- ;, nificant to a project. 8. Staff agrees with the recommended changes and suggests the:following wording: "Faults with the characteristics'in Finding 4 above, should be clas- sified as active. Faults with the characteristics described in - Finding 5 (first paragraph) should be classified as potentially active." - I Y 4 V Oxq 00245 - 1tb i y� J • 9. "- Staff agrees with the recommended change. 10: ;'Staff agrees with the recommended change. 11:.`:• Staff agrees that a change is needed, but suggests a revision in wording rather than deletion of the policy. x "Because of the greater significance of these faults they should ' "'- "-be given emphasis in any required study. In an area of high. seis :'micity, such as Contra Costa County, fault traces which are._marked ' !%y an alignment of epicenter's should be afforded special consider- t ation. In essence, faults exhibiting a high level of seismic ac- .. ' vity should receive special consideration in required geologic : - ,.�' reports." 12: ;-Staff agrees that a change is needed but suggests a revision in -wording rather than deletion of the policies. �. M "Public policy in Contra Costa County should recognize that a severe ' (potentially damaging) earthquake is sufficiently-likely' to warrant.. :' consideration in planning, building and development programs. Struc- tures should be designed and constructed to perform satisfactorily under earthquake conditions (see Table 9)." y 13_ Staff suggests that this recommendation be handled identically to „ w` "Additional Recommendation ;i2". QUslot 14_�:Staff agrees with the substance of the recommendation but suggests the following revision: " •- "Inactive fault traces should be given consideration in the review of proposed projects." - '' 15.""The Advisory Panel suggests a modification in text and/or findings to ensure consistency and avoid confusion. Staff suggests that Finding #3 be modified as follows: The greatest threat from tsunami inundation in Contra Costa County ` . appears to be in the Richmond harbor area. In this area runup may "extend as farinland as the 10 foot topographic contour._ ..�.�.�4. The actual extent of runup depends on several complex factors in- =. ° duding tidal stage, tidal height, height of the tsunami at the _ .. ;,Golden Gate, wind and water currents, and the configuration of the g ;; 'shoreline." a� . 15. Staff agrees with the recommendation. , 00246 41 . n ,.i i ._._��... �• r Tom"' ��'"-'ice va;�^-i �t"1L�`�• ��� ! East aaY Division Centra! 'visionO! KorU "----� (4151 444.8711 w-W C.�lilorni� p 3`162� 14151183.8251 t Diablo Qoalevard C Lafayette,Ca.9e X49 RecOnImended wording for PLANNING CO.'kLtIZSSION RESOLUTION re Seismic Safety Element The Seismic Safety ria . pmt- Staff agrees with the recoaDendatIan. tx 1 F 4% .. .5 -. �"'•` u`�� ` East Bay Division Central Division !-1:.••�31f-1TCECcM.0.'..', ,^:Y L.� �___J (415)444-8711 (415)2113-8251 Of Mordsern California a 3462M..Diablo Boulevard a Lafayette.Ca.945e.9 Recommended hording for PLANNING COMISSION RESOLUTION re Seismic Safety Element The Seismic Safety Element is a public information document intended to be used as a guideline. ' while the Element deals extensively with implementation recom- mendations, it is expressly understood that before any imple- mentation proposal is effected, a thorough study and review shall be made by the staff as to the necessity, for the proposal, giving particular attention to then existing or, proposed Federal, State, and Building Code regulations and requirements. The purpose of such review is to avoid duplication,-of regulation, to fully evaluate the necessity for the proposal,. and to pre— clude placing an unnecessary or excessive burden on either the public or private sectors or the consumer. - The results of such review shall be reported in writing and made available and distributed to all affected parties. Each such report shall include commentary on the cost impact of the pro- posal to the County and private sector. - If the report includes a recommendation for implementation of the proposal, the matter shall be the subject of a public hear, ing prior.to its. promulgation. DIVISION OFFICES WEST DAY SOUTHERN EAST BAY/CENTRAL NOnTIMEIN San Ftm♦cis_o 5u2ta Clara •atavette Sanr."nst 00247 MW E^ v N - r • T STAFF RESPONSE Seismic Safety Element Letter R r 'Associated Home Building Industry y' -DeanLaField, -Undated (Submitted October 7, 1975 hearing) Staff has no objection tothe Planning Commission including wording r i ;similar to that requested in the Associated Home Building Industry's -`ti • 'letter in the Commission's resolution of adoption. However, staff recommends that paragraph two be revised to refer to "...any'new ,k major implementation program..." and that the last (fifth] paragraph. . . fP , ` be:.revised to-read "...a recommendation for implementation of a pro- *` "posal involving significant increases in staff or the significant expenditure of public funds... 1. These modifications are needed because many of the implementation measures of the Seismic Safety Element are tied to routine County , government operations, and several are already in effect because they are not unique to the Seismic Safety Element. Appropiciate -seismic investigations would be required, for example, for 'Environ- mental Impact Reports and certain development project applications whether or not there was such a' thing as the Seismc Safety Element. .'Furthermore, certain staff projects already underway are producing administrative maps, etc., that facilitate the review of project 4� applications,' and it is doubtful if anyone wishes to cloud this kind of work. - 00248 t CA BUILDI-N- 6 L LZI LE3 F-3 a -_ &h AC.710N 3496 Breakwater Court . Ii,,yvJard, California 94545 . (415) 783.6033 t - .00248 0—,, T., W'M"r mimn .mav�r.x•}ir ...,.,.- ?dk`FS'�':'"' 'was+ - - , .. a. a . . �`` U0 ` •, ' B -ft - 1--d h. -"*T ION BUILDIN6 CODI:� Atf%-,# 3496 Breakwater Court Riv ward, California 94545 (415) 783.6033 October 6, ,1975 Mr. Dean La Field ABI Eastern Division 3462 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 Dear Mr. La Field: This is in response to your request dated September 23, 1975, dealing with the seismic safety element of Contra Costa County. One of the major criticisms of the proposed seismic safety element is that it fails to recognize the existing rules and regulations dealing with housing, seismic safety, and fire safety in the State of California. State of California Public Resources Case Chapter 7.5. Division 2, of the Public Resources Code of the State of California ' deals with geologic hazards. commonly known as the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zone Act, Pursuant to provisions of this act, policies and criteria were established by the State Mining and Geology Board. A copy of their policies and criteria is enclosed for your review. In summary, pursuant to the requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zone Act, the following steps have been taken by the state agency: a. Developed hazard zone maps outlining the areas with geologic hazards and faults. b. Established criterias for structures with human occupancy. c. Required that only a registered engineering geologist should prepare evaluation reports when projects are located in geologic hazard areas, d. Forbids construction of structures for human occupancy, private or public, within 50 feet of an active fault unless and until proven otherwise by appropriate geologic investigation conducted by a registered engineering geologist. 00249 Rr Tlu% Cnn0raction Industry Advancement Fund 851 Ourtwal Road, Bi�tin,-,a �,Gc.i•�-.�:.t.::. i ' It is obvious that this matter is of stat—:vide concern and that the State has taken action to preempt the local ju,►c: fictions in this matter. Health and Safety Code. Section 179.12 _ Pursuant to provisions of the State of California Health and Safety Code, Section 17922. the State is required to adopt the latest edition of the Uniform Building Code as published by the International Conference of Building Officials. Pursuant to provisions of Health and Safety Code, Section 17958, the local counties or cities are required to adopt the same requirements as those con- tained in Section 17922. Therefore., the issue of locally amending the Uniform Building Code and the necessity of amending is somewhat ambiguous at this time because the information provided by the Seismic Safety Element in sub- stance has been known for decades. To deal with the seismic situation experienced in California, the Structural Enclincers Association of California proposed amendments to Chapter 23 of the Uniform Building Code. These revisions to the Uniform Building Code have been approved by the International .Conference of Building Officials and shall become part of the next edition of Ui a uniform Building Code. - A new Seismic Zone 4 has been created under the revisions of Chapter 23. In Seismic Zone 4. the forces levels have been increased by LIQ%. Seismic Zone 4 encompasses the Contra Costa County territory. A copy of the revised language and the revised seismic zone map is attached for your review. It appears that the County has to first find Haws with the proposed UBC design loads prior to making any recommendations that the County Building Department get involved with limited expertise in this field. High Rise Buildings (questions have been raised in the proposed Seismic Safety Element with regard to the fire safety in high rise buildings. The State of California fire marshals have adopted rules and regulations dealing with high rise buildings. A copy of these rules and regulations are enclosed for your review. In addition to this, the Uniform Building Code. in Chapter 18, has provisions dealing with new high rise buildings as well. It is totally unnecessary for the County to waste funds to study the subject matter described above, especially when the State has preempted this particular field. I hope the enclosed information will be of help to you. Truly yours. Z' t+ l+rndrew Sabhlol: Executive Director AS:jd 004.50 f'' V`,_ 4tiv r. tA w� STAFF RESPONSEFY Seismic Safety-Element Letter Building Code Action (to Associated Home Building Industry) Andrew Sabhlok; October 6, 1975 ' NOTE: This is-an attachment to the Associated Home Building Industry submittal.-- 1_..On the State of California Public Resources Code (Alqui.st-Priolo Act) The Alquist-Priolo Act mandates cities and counties to administer many of its technical requirements at the local level; and to uti- lize the services of registered geologists in the process. Since —its implementation deadline preceded that of the Seismic,Safety Element, the latter fully recognized its requirements and limits- tions. Parenthetically, the Alquist-Priolo Act deals only with geologic faults (not directly with other seismic or other geologic- , hazards), does not specify structural standards, and is;far from complete in ,its mapping of faults at the present time. No action is requested or necessary. y 2. On the Health and Safety Code, Section 17922 r ;.. . - 'The Advisory Review Panel already has recommended (October 7, 1975 memorandum) that the Seismic Safety Element should recognize the "1976 amendments" made to the Uniform Building Code by the Inter- national Conference of Building Officials and urge their adoption soon by Contra Costa County. These "1976 amendments" address some, but not all , of the subjects of concern identified by the Legisla- ture's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety (p. 91, Meeting the Earth- quake Challenge, January, 1974) and included in the Seismic Safety Element. _ concurs with the recommendation of the Advisory Review Panel. qj�. 3 O Nigh Rise Buildings -!,The concerns regarding fire safety and other potential problems with high rise buildings during earthquakes that were mentioned in the Seismic Safety Element were identified as being derived from the final report of the Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety (a 4- year study). Within the last year, the State has adopted certain new r '. high rise building requirements while others are still under active , ' =; consideration. County staff reviews these proposals and must advise the County government on the adequacy of the regulations. , No action is requested or necessary. 00. nn,. F .,, _ .•. f C4DtIZ;ULtll4G CW4fl!:E I— AND C►lVlP'JtltlEf91r/.G SCIDITISTS CA 11,50.1 <:.��•�t.cn races October 2, 1975 T.rh• X77-tT7 " " C=� Mr. Anthony Dehaesus Director of Planning Contra Costa County Planning Department P. O. Box 951 a •� Martinez, California 94553 Dear Mr. Dehaesus: = s •"'� SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT PUBLIC BEARING DRAFT I have been participating with the ad hoc committee in reviews and discussions regarding the subject report draft. dost of my comments have already been made directly to your staff, but for the record I have prepared this letter and have marked up a review copy of the report, which is enclosed. I have been most impressed with the diligence and dedication shown by your staff, particularly Mr. Zahn and Mr. Meyers; and I believe the draft report is a tribute to their efforts. I am certain that this document will convey to the reader the need for evaluating seismic risks and the urgency of avoiding them or providing adequate defensive measures. I find in particular that a number of the Findings, Policies, and Recommendations presented in Appendix A are so important that I would prefer to see them collected together and presented at the beginning of the element as policy statements where they will be seen immediately and where the impact would be the most profound_ The other members of the committee have voiced similar feelings and one, Mr. Taylor, has even proposed what sections should be thus highlighted. I find two areas of the report of particular importance, in my opinion: (1) that recommending establishment of a Seismic Safety Administrative Referral Panel as soon as possible after approval 0: 252 htnrty It t+lftCp:,; t»cl..ra,l:, :r A-1-!9 ,l :.:�t s c,,,,•..j.:....,o r,n.rxr t2 •_t 1"•r, :) I,..p•,.•.sJ) Houstnn TX ta^ar..rs fl. I 07+.I1ml C'A rmwhp tt[ tpa'-q-C,A Plimoutn Ueeunp:i ront�r..;f7A •;a i3n.k• •s r •• AZ at Lou*P;O i 1►1r. Anthony Dehaesus -2- October 2, 1975 of.the Seismic Safety Element (page 62-3) ; and (2) that calling to attention the necessity for implementing disaster relief plans before the need (as discussed in pages 63-67, inclusive) . I do feel strongly, however, 'that some editorial review is necessary since some statements in the draft appear to be - overstated. It would be essential to so zone the County to prevent a disastrous earthquake from causing untold damage " and many deaths. It would be equally tragic if the County's, policies were interpreted by corporate planners to infer - that worthwhile industrial and commercial developments were to be prohibited along the waterfront area and the Delta. I sense that some of the more restrictive statements are really meant to inhibit residential development--but they should not include those industrial and commercial developments which can afford to design defensively to protect against such disasters. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this review. I hope that my contributions will help to make this the model document for other counties to emulate. Sincerely yours, - t - Bernard B. Gordon BBG.-sb Enclosure cc. Richard Kennett Susanna Schlendorff B. H. Marliave D. Dayton C. L. Taylor W080TMD-C'_V02 CONSUra-MITS 00253 .y P STAFF RESPONSE~- ..- Seismic Safety Element Letter Woodward-Clyde-Consultants Bernard`B. Gordon; October 2, .1975 . The recommendations made in this letter are covered in the Advisory Review Panel's Communication (Mr: Gordon is a member), and the com- ments are useful contextual information. - , • � r - - - +4' , 1 :0254 iADa} r i ttotxi • WAiPDUU BEACH. KA7AA, AZUAI- HAWAII - S wt' ice' •a n ytsi E' • 254 x a .P , ._ n?:,Yv a /� � `.. �.r�-s�.�'t.c:.G�- �►�.�G^'� �n",��-yam.,-•��� t • . �. +ii.Jeav+LL B Vv:.tri WAAPODU iki4Ch. ?WAA, A:WAI. MAWAii f'` 'r' ' i, •• F 3TC!��: � - •,:-r,.,. zu� 1 m _ -_j �+7" - lz 41. �� �,/G� .\:ih�Sl�.►V-�+G� O+w .rfvZG �M+���..C,¢y,yQ,G .AIF�.(r-�'�./u�e^^�JSI� • of� � /�...+s�s''.�•s ,,,�! ... .i�./�-C � t --�,..--.—.. «(iw• SCK ".c"'�' ..�R:i=.SCS' Gi.+,/t LK.!rr'ii�/�cr �+„%„I� tyr•(' .-•~{+m-,- L �+�7v�*si'�?1�1,j./+�" .ni+^yMr..f..�"r/G Lk .!�s�.,s�'/�+Q V ...:t��,,,l�.b.'i �i.i:t""...:G?►r��"� �•:1.: t4,d.sr-+r.L�a.iar ��M/ �Ti.rlrMli.,���.L /'I./�" �'��/.)^,�'-' i^ ,�j�Y. \✓�"� �L '�j���'�'�, I/���/♦.� ! •9t„p• Pt ky `�y J ..i __'�_ �-'_—^F — G�I..�'+'JMQ ."i^�y �RMIZ/I•j� /�wl�/ j���G��G"�j4/ ' �r I•.A �• , �{I-, k, =+ t^,../,,. Pat C-,�•}'s '�.%�..r.s�,�'�.. �''•�� C;�?'.i�rw .�ss- -rs�-�•„G�""'✓r' �-.�-s. lst/t.�..■.,��`"' .»• cL tale's � ' ..•..•.� �'�'hSr"�"''�,.��. _ '� /,',�;,r► �..,�.- �+^� `fes'-�� /""��f ,.Z �".�::L_ � � „ Z"..7."'.. 1,..'�.•sKiG ,�►��;1� G'.nca..o..�.L--..��+� ti�tll,'•7F.s�"LG�t/a~.'4Z.�� J'� �� f.-,>."'--;--. 6y/{J}��.///yyylll/J♦ ()PERATFf)S)f ISLAND HOLIDAYS COX%=All, 002575 4 t' i° t.�! SA hvt 1 wn»ouu Sar", KAFAA KAUAI. waII d � s+ � �.�� .ar .i-- � -+1`x`'`1,. �"'`r '".""...._..---•------ of .7 tJ'►� C/Li�G4J��'" orf" �,,.t— /1" s�� �,...+n�,�,j�y.+•..•!+.'� G 0025 ,��..f__.....------- •._ f yJYwrJa�,�alK,y�q!,� OpptATELl SY!SL%�AtD /�• ar, r�w/Rw..r 4"IJM '.ij*y �TR•F•. .IY.Y`+1'� wi. "7�14!5 7 ,t STAFF RESPONSE Seismic Safety Element Letter "' Rodney G. Huppi; -September 30, 1975 p ►= wqc t r 00255 OPERATED 8v ISLA140 HOLIDAYS 'd` SF J'.•.., _..,.,.--- ,R,• ,..,,,,.,l,w, 1+�7 ..r„•..- '^k•+r.77`i"' ....r ` STAFF RESPONSE s .r - -� Seismic Safety Element letter ' t Rodney G. Huppi; September 30, 1975 The:recommendations made in this letter are covered in the Advisory , Review Panel Communication (Hr. Huppi is a member) and the comments are useful contextual information. 3 ... Y rM , K �� �"'} ��i- _ +.,r•- .rte "' w>', ,X, w 7. , L w • R a - v" `fir.', "`' • - ." • ,r jam• Wig" _ ..,..,.orc•.Ysro,:u:ay 4 iT +. ': }iimRM _ _ BURTON 11. INIARIA"E' r�1��xul;nl�E: :Fan cx:lyr fu:u�a��-lcia� E:nwnlI•!cl�r.!:l:�,l.uu�sr _ o�rr Aa,1 !uU Stwrt Strad �, Lat�r2rtk:C�1►[•Kai�;fli.'�r40 . ' T1.701� x JC'�1C(31911EzC �Ji 17� taG� 6 �� r 3 , �h'I►4i �•.,�1'� ��„;*hrtilly . � Cor .rulIt� ♦ ♦ J x isafe -iow of Rev � x to f p ^$U�1 A a- r � ' - r� c i.Rr► f=r f,o, R•vr�•F,r F.x►� . Tl�:tnk ••:r11 fnr J* _-�,.ur.'t+�t• }� o, P� p ,tt►► X11 ..+ .. ••y,;r rfill!li► X!� w; .� 6r� rid)t►t �11�4-'ir,1.•* �.•.:• wt.'�*..�`��y ,�';j l,!g1E�A}�� ;T I; " :�• r �.►•w f"!/►1h,-' E:Rra�{► �'1't`/" 1�' �'' 1��'•1i•'�f 1�i, j1 4�n,� 1rA�fZ� ��"�1 . �1,�, Mti � ,>; .. .- �1a C ViP.• •fs• *: i A r � f f4 • ' .i.rl • t4}(. F('t•�} ''.J_• s4 or 'x�rr��re n.. �>�N �> n. =tr ci*t: "nlltxwoe1 h '?' 'as h-=7 :; RgF• TEl �;i., "4Ef'df;It•�,rs.l illl.r;h'4i }r:�Y74Ir; f.410 t'S=CIl : 1n•► n.',��•r Jt'F IE4' ;llt� t}IltTt!Z'—" upti .'t1 lip. sUfflE.QC i T�! 1} r?..,��►rr� n� �rtt► TCLnT�- .utr�Ihd ":�Vt23r�' n1ilrh -r(.z�•(• i_4�u*Z. :coll3•d. then o�3:n�r :xrt ;I)pundax: T� • 1:rorr,rl,v Z�,G(a, r. .y�tElE��x i:llzr tt 4:4r,- ..r..► �e . �• s • •i y 1 .ep �` •!�'T:Ru�! 'i t1r► Cr r.•ir rtE�'..,_, r 3` [u.3.. illcittit-fled Baa : t'o.]owr .:l�N,; 'a �:•1 ch n; o in Clime w�rrtt�x}�; :pro: re;errnce• tos �..�, wr r•tai :• IE4 _at ,, n ca r�f• 19 $1}}Cr' only 4:hn t4•r.. .1•• i:, r.-t�x -v1�i�_�.a ,•.. .i.-. ,.J 3; A Jpi: n-01Y, Litt lo ,. ic�u�.d br: '.tit3.�:•1"..''H:�ppn.� F:-tu],t;rt �t4! -� Aldi-L -�1 i f.n�,_r. rv..ror!Urea. 6 pie Z .�rlyi; dil.t1czt fr(} ,•, .►r Er<crR^• x*_ (, �'•hn,, r:llfr!!3 �1t}.^..':7�}► 4� . n .r In �qv c+p).xu,olt W4�� . 3 atm z=:t'l K :�.� s ^'� `µ��` Ing- ;? txi i}gur. c}n ono Af t4le foltr, f:+al3 t Satin it i:,' ns} .lRAru ;.tluulaanwcrctc;tlt'► c"xri the Uoo4lr Ca� •t :trio. tE};".rrr' 3}:aue ?f zrntl 27 chnn ;n �1ze NEYT(3"rl�•.i1m ► h sifi C »I'4i4l�1t1:r3;•� t�;4T;41rir'-yrjr:" 28 ouib lines 6i7,`n� #9 Aa n . +� ^til tai�r1. Cr•t�r+d 7t. nett r �;Errra I�—A. 4;ih nhr. rrx:•1r±N f 11 w w !.h•t'r('t►rrT• s• �'"" t:2trf` t?r'IC '!.:- •.J .�• s•�Ih� •ri Il•��11� ' ( -key ml t•h m �; 'ill �'+l�•4r4lr•YI� . •�I�t r'�% a�xl]•' Ir �� � s'r3.Q ACda.m tl.^•r11--4�:}' •► 'n ►rLirtt*x;1T!t±:. rtwC�A«� C' c� !� ..'1CCSiNnr.�x* �rf.�• rr +hr. ilt ;jot• p n shakin tsn�t �;routtd, ailuro, 3.cs CrPquet3y, �:,har :►..Cc rug tax s 092 • F•l inti irsw ��. i�`,►1 T��:.` i)A r► -{►1 t it lit I .• ;. t.l ;w,.;r� ,i tl •ah n i ilifil ].11Cl:U�t= #11 �{�;(� #:,� 1 'fr:Ct �+i.ti•: :!tcl ,og•�r: ht �► c t�:ul- .� .tyfvo er • a w tt)�. tTrlo :.rtt�tC .f'�a►� E' t{ �.h .� fs{wsa. tn:. aro`-{Tei ,*tT�3s. cf. r ?` ° ., nz r•n Or ,,tent stlay tcG �►' M�►. *ul;� �•:� f., ., cet n .��ubl�c aafs' nit od�•r ff: th,. .:pns1 li•�n �� �;►ni:nnl:i �,lyac�tivn.,.�s�ul-� � � � �. AtNcorhlRIl�{�,:ttl�1X1.. �$ uith niAiicr 7ral, Consis L. woonor F r tt #1 1G r►_7 iaol.irl�•5 a:.r.1 �f � , ,� h��.� Flow ,# zc�c of}���,t►�iF�., , -nn.i q �`l„tTc�.i].3�#, L. � r•�•�l,ntl.Te.t�ln�, '.T��� C enalllu.o.+ x \.�". •;n nc.t`C��-X►G Of i'St`.t►�"�-�* flca�il�.n� �)� ft9.l.til'�';, .* ')r• �,t SAR1 T fiY'1C'.'"t t►�l. .. n f LaQt1 �i:*tri oo• N �{ tw�t�i.JY w I� .'{ t•'rn). ►2)TL'r�.ff 1) 4.x? +n 'Fnl�nie:�tsar,. �3 ; h ; e'Gd`= mot � �•,_ , ., 439 20 �_�i lir4 . �", .i�•i:int{:i 1 !f +11. r' ��"`n,rd by", e.1r.G�{.t►):s�t�a. CIllvc: e,�rt2nn '' r t� !t:23 I°t'.a.; u,,,; '�G' k , tFci)na.c t{c:-Gtor. 1)et 'in'.thn 22 I', 1 am i-,t .On i,�ic..lo.at .ho)tl�l bF. �.a ,�,�, a"R!{){a,�; 1 .-{)� �i ...: 'wr.� tlttl7�« •�► f-a�rl.�.,. Coll 1 t ��. �t ,• "I TOUR .t�cPx'l'�v�f h ` 4 i f v� ' 4z o00 �'w �`Ya a 9 A r r + MIRPOSE + lhis Seismic Safety Element is apart of the Contra Costa County, �e General Plan. r The Seismic Safety Element is a public policy for relating the County's st programs for land use planning, the provision of public improvements,- +t; and the deveiolment (or redcvelopnent) of land to the County's seismic characteristics. Although attention has been given historically to the perforvsnce of buildings and structures during earthquakes,{ compara- tively' y� tivel • little attention has been given to the subjects of how land uses F � :.� should be distributed, or building developments laid-out, on a seismically •1 vc landscape. This is the realm of the Seismic Safety Element, and it Promises to be a field for innovation for years to come. 0 The Seismic Safety Element is particularly important Zo Contra Costa County bmause the County is located in one of the-most seismically active areas of California. it is subject to severe ground shaking, l;round failure, :cud flooding from earthquakes occurring both within !j the County and the flay Arca, and it is additionally subject to ground ' rupture from earthquakes on a number of faults located within the l tounq. d'urthcr, the potential for earthquake damage is increasing as 'the County grows in population and as development extends into +t higher risk areas such as certain of the hill areas and natural flood= _ Plain areas. This is Contra Costa County's first Seismic Safety EIement. Because - it is largely based on available information, it is expected to be i ;-upplcmentued mid made more ccmprehensive as its implementation program +! is carried out and as more detailed information is produced. Y S1:1S'tilC SAFETY GOALS E J 'the Seismic Safety Element was prepared to further several long- _ range and on-going goals of Contra Costa County; these are: ,t 1. To prevent the loss of human life from seismic causes. i -. To minitaize serious injuries to human beings from seismic causes. � To facilitate the provision of essential services following a disaster from seismic causes. r e 4• To reduce damage to property froom seismic causes consistent .i with (balanced against) financial capability, duality of life, and environmental quality, i ' - 1, facilitate recovery from a disaster from seismic causes. �r t 00260 • 1 1 wpm J Tile objective.. l,olicie::, and recommendations of this plan are intended (� to address these goals. t ; GEM tAL 01111 I1VES - t i ; The Seismic Safety Element is intended to serve the following; purposes: 1. To comply with Section 6S302 of ti►e California Government Code ' requiring cities and counties to include Seismic Safety filaments in their General flans. 2. To provide a basis for better considering earthquake hazards + and other hazards in public and private: decision making,, 3. To incorporate earthquake hazards, and other hazards, into the considerations of the General flan -and its several ;! component elements. 4. To provide'a basis for contingency planning; for redevelopment I t following a severe earthquake or other disaster. r d - S. To provide a basis for including; know-ledge of earthquake hazards and other existing or potential haZ3rds into consideration in zoning, subdivision, and other development ordinances. Pti •tl'; ' G. To provide a basis for including knowlcdge of earthquake hazards - and other hazards in mandatory referrals, environmental impact • statement reviews, and other project reviews. 7. To provide a basis for updating local emergency services plans i in terms of post-disaster response and recovery. -Planning Implications . , in exercise of its responsibility to provide for the public safety in areas which are considered Potentially hazardous in frac event of an {•;';.;j i earthquake. :approvals for ptd)lic and private development projects slaa"!c '+;,; .•: be contingent on geologic and engineering studies which define and de/ Cate potentially hazardous geologic and/or soils conditions and recon t-, means of mitigating these adverse conditions. POLICY Ar4D Apr•Ilt'i'ISTIm'fivE Dim- Tlt1N a Vie-act of the Board of Supervisors in. adopting an element of the Countl �.L►� General Plan implies certain policy positions relative to other units of governrynit . in,] the giving; (if certain administrative directions to Comm) adep:artwents. In the c:e:c of the Scismic Safety Element. it is recorocn1:l I•. that these positions and directions be cnnarnunicate•d formally as a means t• I iriplementation. .tanung; other considerations, this will facilitate irnplc_' { t:ation tlarwia-1: the ptuject revieu process. Specifically, the fullowin6 t' actions shuuld be taken: 1. Agencies of the federal government aa:al:ing; physical improvcrnenc, in �• .j Contra frusta C4,tinty Okl►artment of the Navy, etc.) or administerin'n t develoix.rient l,t•ugr:ans (Deparmcrtt of lk►usin), and 11rhan lacvelopmont, r• slivul•l be rryiu•ste.l to ulfserve file Cuuraty'a seismic safety criterit :and pul is ies in carrying; out their programs. • Ott,-. 1 :.a J ' . should be rcquested to a uuics of the S_., olicies. ate r. cri tcria and p 2, Similarly. ahprol' safety . SC1SOalC ,nit !-an.��•Gnn— t observe the County's -. . _..-. .a__ ...., •� L•' blItLCTION t me act of the ttaard "`--L•�. •,:- '�` Gencrat of of Supervisors in,ado a , 4;. f,., P.orcrnrtrt►t. nn,-plies certain colic - itinl; an element elr ►.trt"erttS. 1 the gic int; c.i'l 3 psi bans relay of the County t that !n the cane of certain admircistra relative to other units of 3 '. . these t'trsi Lions sot►e! the tieiauric Srrfct Live directions to Count irotolc-met,tatic,n• y u clirecticart, l,e Y tiletnt:r►t. it 1 tat icon • '�''nf. the tc::►s cr"'�entic.tLeci { i$ rcrcrr�cn�:= aeLicanttihuulet rite 111"jec:t rcriewtpro t•r-,tie,ns, tlti; will a-1 a meanscr toe 1 recess• i I l faci t i t:t to 1`• ' taken: SP4ci ticall � y, the t ' '! I• •4e'ncic� follor+itt ( (if ttte federal Contra t e,st:t "r•,,r,i w- Rove rnMISSt to (ttr• ?• tkitrl, dcvt•lnt,•,scrtt ret, • t.r rtmcrtt at" tttc Physical iart,rpvc.rRt'nt. in she, t t,r:,,,s (l ilartmcrtt t'l:rvy, etc. Lc rr,t,te•sic-.t of lir,►x•ir, . ) or acre,►irtisterin" { and put i;ice to ubser•t-c the C e. and tlrhan It Ve itt c:,rr}•ltt; aunty a 5cisa," cttlal'ment, r.• • t uett iht'ir 1'rc l;rams, ec saret . ? cri reels MWIM2. Similarly. appropriate agencies of the State :should be requested to observe the County's seismic safety criteria and policies. 3. Regional agencies should be jnfdrmed, especially the Regional Clearing- ' «• house (AHAG). �• 4. Hon-County public agencies and utilities making physical installations in Ltoc County should be informed. S. The several cities in the County should be informated pursuant- to ' State Planning Law. s _ 6. County departments should be directed to comply with the Element. 7. tion-public associations and financing institutions involved in the development process should be informed, of the Element's policies. OROIMAtCE AD14INISTRATION - As effective as advisory or disclosure project reviews ma}: be, ultimately . the force of law is needed to back up the review process or dcal 'directly with some of the more difficult hazardous situations. The planning agency already administers several ordinances that regulate development and these �• are adaptable to the implementation of the Seismic Safety Ell -went. 1. Factlt Zone Ordinance. A special ordinance needs to be written and i adopted by the County dealing with the specialized subject of imple- menting the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zones Act. The proposed C' ordinance should require applicants for real estate developments or structures for human occupancy within official Special Studies Zones to comply with the provisions of the law and establish a fee scne:d-.:.c. 2. County Zoning Ordinance. The County Zoning Ordinance should be amended to provide specifically that seismic safety is a significant public purpose underlying the exercise of zoning; requirements in Contra Costa C ot.atty. The amendment should require V-ologic and ether studies in areas found to be potentially hazardous. It should also refer to cook- pliance with the general plan (meaning compliance with the Seismic Safety Clement and other related subject mutter) pursuant to Section 6S600 of the: State Planning law. IL 3. County Subdivision Ordinance. i 7. 11te sttiodivisiun and telling ordinances should be a=cndcd so that they 4. .Z— t specify that geologic, soil, and seismic safety factors are to be talo 1 4' 1Q into account during project review and that appropriate geologic and/1 r. +. ` soils investigations can be required in areas considered to he potenfs c hazardous. Standards for required reports should reflect awarcness of the hazard as well as the nature of the project. As noted carlicr iTj j j this report, rrattiremcuts for geologic andbir sails investi}rations at.t E reports, could be staged cr phased. depending on the: circumstances. _` t B. Required reports should be risen technical review sfck`6n % that therl 1 i scope and direction of the; investigation is appropriate for the naturl I i of the project and its gcoll-gic setting. A a 4 ifagy, .. - .• '- •,til •y-6 ..� t �•Iw•K... ',�, :. � - ..�.� sir - w ... ":s-` .:•1. , Com,• ar IV _ > t� STAFt RI:SPOHSL t,. Seismic- Safety Element Letter Burton-_.H. Marliave; September.2S, 1975 ala The recommendation for a "highlights" prologue is provided in ,the. %,"Advr Review Panel's communication. Staff will gladly take' iso -= Mr.: Marliave's suggestions into account during its preparation. -� "`^� �i2 `'-„This recommendation is covered in the Advisory Review,Panel's ' r `communication. 03':This recommendation is covered in the Advisory Review Panel's ' f%7 - ^,communication (staff concurs). A4.,:-.The substance of these recommendations is covered by the Advisory ,hRevier► Panel's communication. Staff agrees with the substantive -7�-% 8S.:,.,criticism but recommends the Advisory Review Panels -approval. #6. : The recommendation calls for elimination of the Wildcat fault from Table 4. The information on the Wildcat fault is takej* from a geologic study performed by the California Division of Mines and "L s- �ology for the Tri-cities Seismic Safety Element- (the'Cities of 74 "El Cerrito,- Richmond and San Pablo). Members of the Advisory Review --Panel have suggested that the trace of the Wildcat fault shown on Map 2 of the Element be revised to agree with the trace mapped for , the Tri-cities Seismic Safety Element. Staff concurs with the. �:•-♦ `Advisory Review Panel's approach. R7. The earthquake recurrence estimates for the San Andreas and Kayward :-_ ." =• faults are based on informationpresented in a report titled "A . . .s--Study of Earthquake Losses in the San Francisco Bay Region". The a K n projections for the Caiaveras and Concord faults are estimates made- by staff. The text of the Element does indicate that the recurrence ..•estimates are approximations. The important point is that both Mrs ` �- .,estimates s projections and staffs projections lead to the conclu ter°` , sion that an earthquake is sufficiently likely to warrant considers a8 This recommendation is covered in the Advisory Review Panel's.commu t_ sI`nication (staff agrees). 89. =11iis recommendation is covered by the Advisory Review t'anel's cocmau nication. =�.« #10. .The basic recommendations are good. Staff will re-write the text .:under discussion using these suggestions. 811. . Staff agrees with the recommended changes. #12. ,Staff agrees with-the recommended changes. 0'X53 j *a 'ti4.lS�T.^ '� ,...:•, -'�^II, r: .i -'•fir; �,;yk%''.,-t, Y,?� ?' ':a:'"S''�'q';w .y.r.�{• �T.. A13 '�Staff'agrees,with the substance of the recommendations but prefers a. � somewhat different wording. #14= . Staff agrees that consistency among public agencies is a goal that governments should seek to achieve with respect to seismic safety, but cautions that this must be done on the basis of a suitable standard. This philosophy can be- incorporated into the recommenda- tion.. Staff agrees. j w #lt a:`This 'recommendltion .is covered by-the Advisory RevieMtPanel's recom mendation (staff:agrees). . Staff agrees. 4 - #18 Staff agrees. L 'x �. f a�c• r ` , . } ' #19.. ' Staff agrees with the substance of the recommendation but prefers a ` somewhat different wording. ,: '• Dams and'-levees should be regarded as critical facilities. Dams -: should not be sited over the trace of an active fault. To the ­7&xttnt practicable, levees and aqueducts should avoid active fault traces. When such crossings are necessary, structures snourd'be designed to minimize or accommodate the effects of surface faulting. s - t. #20_j .Staff agrees. - w 4 #214. This might be done if the Seismic Safety Element was only to be used `-`. 'as a set of policies and specifications by practicioners in the seis- ' mic safety fields; however, the first purpose of the Seismic Safety =; Element is to enable the people of a community to understand its ' seismic•'situation before deciding on what.actions it wants to take. y "The discussions on -seismicity and-County geology in the Element ad- . YM .. dress this need.. IrZ #2Z'- ;This recommendation is covered by the Advisory Review Panel's commu- nication. ommu nication. _ , twa ' t S iii��. , ^.�. ..�. l•y '7•a T. •� � _� Al , �t .y'}^ k.,, � �� - ^ ` 9 '►'' "+'''.. ,e. L !` • �,s, pry i` x.. r ,. 41�'t'-"D d. ,r ",., '._ � • 'L yr*� , ♦",'- 1xs�P • •• r ^, z 's.♦7 ;,�� n ro^ _ �.� is , _ , a v .. ,.-*.. .�.. .. r �. CCC"P D ♦ a M •sMl ' Stwlf t,+ CAIurlrr:lA rltrsrrn•-S w.rU � S'^/AnnH ;.rarx: -- . �_-_ _ =` ==�Ntlrttrl►rr G. ..:Unrr Jo__ ��. • ,. I HENT OF I RANSPOk W 101.1 '. P.o. T.Ox .1??-S RINCPN AMEX ' �' ! ' 1 't•• 1} 1* SAN rimNaxo 94119 (4131 $57.1840 JCP Z" j•tt 1 - 411 September 23, 1975 ..•;1 „ SlAsmic Safety Element Draft Revi ev Contra Costa County 11r. Anthony A. Delviestts Contra Costa Comity Planning Department P. O. Rox 951 Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Mr. Dehaesus: The Draft seismic Safety rlr%m^nt anti it:-. Enlironrm..ntal. Impact Iteport were reviee:!!d anci the followintl comments areoffered for your consideration: Draft Seismic Sa fatty r1e1vicn t- Pq. 51, par. 3 Althounh beth utility and transportation facilities (parti- cularly bridnes) are certainly vulnerahle in a major earth- Rual;e, the record providerl by the San Fernnndn earth"Istake of 1971 sucign,ts that temporary repair of trap:portation facilities will proceed at a much more r.apirl pace than utility #1 repair. This is probably clue to the extensive undr'r.cjrotsnd components of utility systems. 1n the 1971 ::an Fernando eartliqua ke for instance, traffic was restored on hiciltw:ey, on a temporary hasis t:ithin twelve hr_tirs and a complete. rn±routinci within four days, while the City of San Fernando did not have a temporary ahoveRroand tater system completed for. 11 days, electric power was out for many day. in some areas, and the telephone system was out over a wide area clue to arjuinment collapse in a central station.l These comparisons sturaest that utilities have a hinlier vulnerability tivan transportation systems in cteneral. Ile therefore rerlue::t .dcletinr " (lige transportation facilities) " from paragraph 3, line? 2.' Pct. 52, par. 2, line 3 Sugge,tacid i n<< to end of :en tenc e. for rnrpo::�► fic z- YV2 tion ". . .read i t y improvised within a relativr_ly short Period of time, proUahly hours or clava." 1/ it. S. m-pt. of Corn:u--rcc (t-lnAA) , A :tu.iv of Earthquake Losses in the San Francisco Cay Area, 1972, p174. 0046-5 v •'' ��.�1iac sus . ;lY• Anthony A. „ P;zci0 T%1;o 1975 $eptember 23' l-�•-F G 1• J transport�tion pc{• ,2 fac ,�.� u fram�� 4l_.iRu:: ar' ' ling, 3 '�ragraph 31. dirt �.�'--`•c� >t .e. Srtc 2 tion eM t i.nil to •lel' Grin r l v o f "en keneo for of titi1e�, Provaldy itio Lry i=^ri i ri,t.11 i n a PrrrlM=:,,.; of �. or day.. r'eZativnZ- 'T`-,rifxcz_ Y short pnriocl � '�'• n f Coen In t1!@ PralicisCq y- e-0 (40AA) A i_-,l. ZIT?., p,I7�£ Earth�IuaF. .e Losses V0405 .' • ;sir.. Anthony A. �.�tiausu^a Page Two September 23, 1975 Pq. 52, par. 3, last G lines The section is misl-e dinq as wnr e4; rnqu--st it be rel-rordnd as follows: "The California Department of Transportation (CALTRAHS) has condticterl Special stuclins of arinfi incr frec►x-n r!- overpasn structures throughout the state, incItiding Contra Costa Cnunty. Those bridge-,s which wr_re foun•l to b� thy; most. ,#3 potentially hazardoii s uncler scisnic conditions werr� rn.inforcnrt, taking into consideration seisni.c activity, traffic, structure framing, structural details and height. None of the briflgas selected were located in Contra Costa County, blit-consideration will periodically be given on future retrofit contracts to upgrading selected bridges in Contra Costa County." Pq. 52, - par. .l Some consiOcration should be given to aid and assistance available fron. outside the Bay Area following a great .earth- quake. CALTR,ANS has the capability of requesting maintenance #4 assistance -from any or'all of the other ten State Highway Districts located within the state, all of which have maint- enance crews and equimmnnt which can Io-- put to work to restoring traffic on highways on relatively short .notice. There are no comments regarding the Environmental Itdnact Report. Thank you for allowing us to review this draft. He would appre- ciate receiving a copy of the final, report. Very truly yours, T. R. LAM1;1132S - Distr?hIC ' Dir, tr�r DY - czt B. 1TO.w Deputy District Director 00266 l:. �+!c"e�ts `:vv+,l w�. ."a'—•+a, +i. r. -scut fP`-OW*•-,a Ar STAFF RESPONSE Seismic Safety'Element Letter California Department of Transportation B:_.C.. Bachtold;. September 23, 1975 a " ;i. V #1... 'Staff agrees` to the deletion of the parenthetic clause-.',' transportation facilities)." 2.' 'Staff agrees to the change in wording recommended by. CALTRANS. , 13 Staff believes that its concerns and those of CALTRANS can be . _ covered by revising the present wording of the-last two para graphs to read: m , `__...found to be -the most potentially hazardous under earthquake conditions. Factors taken into account in establishing the degree of risk included seismic activity, traffic, structure framing, structural details and height. CALTRANS had -indicated that some bridge structures in the County have been given special study. Although no bridges in the County have been reinforced, CALTRANS has stated that "consideration will periodically be given on future retrofit contracts to upgrading selected bridges in Contra Costa County." A Staff believes that the additional information supplied by CALTRANS should be included in the Seismic Safety Element text. The following wording is recommended: ` —'.The CALTRANS district serving Contra Costa County has the capa i.ty of requesting maintenance assistance from any or all the other CALTRANS districts in California. According to CALTRANS "? such assistance, in the form of men and equipment, is available few on relatively short notice. tV w v Y . _ r .• _.. _00 26'7 F_A! T BAY MUNICIP.-It I/1IL11Y IN511:IcT . .., . -.,. . . ,...,� September 23, 1975 Air. Anthony A. Uehaesus Director of Planning Contra Costa County Planning Department Y.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Dear Mr. Dehaesus: Thank you for the opportunity to review the revised Seismic Safety Element and the Technical Background Report of the General Plan for Contra Costa County. These are excellent documents reflecting;-much careful preparation by you and by your staff. Our comments which follow are relatively few considering the significance of these documents. Seismic Safety Element Page 19 - Map 2: We suggest deletion of the word "Major" from the nl title of this map. All of the faults shown are not major faults, and certainly are not so relative to the Hayward and Calaveras which are major faults. Page 21. 4113 Par. : It would be helpful if the scope of the. geologic inves- y2 tigations and reports to be required were better defined. Requiring; '�� these reports for all "mapped" faults may be an unreasonable require- + ment.. Page 27 - Table 5: Accompanying text statements regarding the intended n3 use of Table 5 should also be placed on Table 5 in order to prevent misuse of the values shown if applied out of context. Page 37 - Figure 5: Several EBWIUU dams are incorrectly located. rr•4 See our drawing NRE-433 enclosed. Numbers 20 and 21 are trans- posed as located. Page 39 - 6th Par. : We question the significance of the concern for #5 the smaller dams which are not under the jurisdiction of the State Division of Safety of Dams. Page 45 - 'fable 9: The extra project cost percentages shown in the #6 last colunui are probably low and may be very misleading;. Page G1 - Fatilt Zone Ordivanace: Whatarc the "Official Special n7 Studies :cones"? Zones as presently related to known active faults by the State Geologist are reasonable and should be extended as additional information and evidence is obtained. Inclusion of all $$mapped" faults in such zones would be unreasonable. ^ A•♦•/::•a•Mw, w r .n•cr•r,-If.K • r tI•• ......•••'•,f. .. N..N.rR.r••r•Y?•.M •I..•.rr•.J µ/l.r•rr/ 00268 1 1 • •. 1132 Anthony A. Dehaesus -2- Selric:inbcr 23, 1975 .US Page 69 - 2nd Par. : I-larag;raph is repe=ated. Page 69 - last Par.: Since June 1974, four State instruments have g been installed on Briones Dam and 23 other instruments at nine CBi IUD sites in Contra Costa County have been recommended by a site selection subcominittee. Page A-6 - 2nd Par. : We suggest that the last word "faulting;'" be X10 deleted and "potential displacement" substituted therefore. The term "reasonably suspected faulting" is much too inclusive. Page A-11 - 2nd Policy: "The fault system of which it is a part" X11 or "mechanicaly related faults" should be better defined. Page A-23 - 8th Par. : The construction of works "to limit the inun- n12 dation potential" may not generally be feasible and costs must be compared with costs for improvements in the safety of the dam itself. #13 Technical Background Report Most of the above comments regarding; the Seismic Safety Element also apply to corresponding portions of the Technical Background Report. Page 163 - 4th Par. : We have not yet completed our study of Lafayette Dam so "leas conducted" should be changed to "is conducting. " Page 169 - 5th Par. : We suggest that "some" rather than "many" + of these structures are "highly susceptible to damage and failure.rr Page 170 - last line: Should read "...potential inundation area.. . Page 194 - Alap 16: The Aloraga City Ball should be added. We are particularly in favor of your recommendations for a Seismic Safety Administrative Referral Panel. Your discussion of Seismic Risk is also very good, and it appears that these documents generally utilize very practical and reasonable approaches to the significant problems. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance on this matter. We would appreciate receiving; final copies of both the Seismic Safety Element and the Technical Background Report when completed. Very truly yours, W. T'. AN7•QN Director of Engineering; 004to Ir .7wiC .,t -. :r2 -.►:."'`z"''•+.r4sY+''"""g..�.R•^-"�ICT'E' .tc+.i ".y,.:a,' a"r' il::."!�" �'f�TC 'T1' . 7tF.,••!'$. "? . t STAFF RESPONSE Seismic Safety Element Letter Y East Bay Municipal Utility District " W. F. Anton; September 23, 1975 #l:a -�This is covered in the Advisory Review Panel Communication, 1 �(staff agrees). #2'�. This is covered in the Advisory Review Panel Communication'. (Staff agrees, the original intent of the Element was•- that - yam_ . < - .=- all mapped faults--along with other suspected site condi- tions--must be suitably accounted for during the land de- . - velopment process, not that every mapped fault would require a full-scale geologic study and investigative report. The � :. appropriate level of investigation will be determined in the r' " t 7 regular course of reviewing a project application.) #3, ;- This is covered in the Advisory Review Panel Communication (staff agrees). i . Staff agrees. Appropriate changes can be made to Figure 5 -when the report isrevised for publication following adoption of the Element. 'r #5."'-This is covered in the Advisory Review Panel Communication. #6. :- The table in question originated with the Legislature's Joint Committee on Seismic Safety. Staff thought it advisable to A follow the lead of that body until accumulated experience pra- �;, vided a better set of figures. To avoid misinterpretation, however, we recommend that the text specify that the "extra , •_ cost" figures-in the table are estimates. #7 " The Fault Zone Ordinance recommendation on page 61 pertains ---,_ only to the County's administration of the Alquist-Priolo Act. At present this state law is being administered by County de- Ya�` .•apartments under the authority of an interim Board of Supervisors' policy. The recommendation simply indicates that this policy :. ;should be superceded by an ordinance (a future action Conten- I"4 plated when the policy was adopted). #8. ' This is a typographic error which can be corrected in future u-~ editions of the Element report. #9-', The information provided by EBMUD is correct. The Element text should be revised accordingly. 0OZ70 m h R A t �i - x x,�r��_ I •ar,iA a i��siA'!. X ,,,y i ^��_ i «,.,+x !d `'.C• 1 .�!„i..�'L�c�...:�� �•v. r � . -aV A � � - r. ..:.. - jam'• : 4' _. ._ (.. i,"i 9 • i #10.' This is covered in the Advisory Review Panel Communication. , • (Staff basically agrees. The words "reasonably suspected" F� should be deleted.) _ #11.-'Staff agrees. It will -improve the definition as an editorial h change. *. .. #12_:`Staff agrees. Suitable-qualifying wording can be included in. the text as an editorial -change. ' � � . #13 Staff concurs with the corrections suggested for the Technical ° Background Report. they will be added soon to the current " edition of the Technical Background Report in the form of an erata sheet and incorporated into future editions of that re- port. • _ a tea,.+'• -. .-: . . - .. _ • _ ,� yrs +,. ���;� wr. ,• �� �r t, .s *-4' a-. • r . � �. �y.<` •: ♦—4 - ` 1yy.5" 'Mil.-'•�1, ... - �a�" �"i.',bad'•"i�l�"✓ f .i� Sy 'f-h��:n f ` "�'",,M� 00271 .11 T _Y Y a ! ,✓ ,J,5 , :ate `yi.. -. ,„. 's� - "r• l g ti September 16 197S +� - Contra Costa County Planning Commission c,c�tt A r.• yp f County Administration Building . Martinez, California 94S53 F•' ' ` - .� •�' Gentlemen: The proposed Seismic Safety Element and the Technical Background Report are very impressive documents. It is obvious that a great deal of time and personal effort has gone into preparing the documents. The County Planning Department and the individuals involved in the Seismic Safety Element are to be congratulated. When adopted, the Seismic Safety Element will become part of the Contra Costa County General Plan. As such , the Element will become the public policy for land-use planning, improvements, and development in accordance with the County' s seismic charac- teristics. The Seismic Safety Element states that: "Because the administration of seismic safety requirements involves a wide range of technical knowledge and the exercise of judgment and interpretation, it would be desirable for Contra Costa County to create a panel of experts to assist in its administrative process. Such a panel could be modeled after the Bay Conservation and Development Commission's Engineering Criteria Review Board and include senior repre- . sentatives of the geological, structural, engineering, and soils engineering professions in its composition. The panel could advise staff on Seismic Safety-Element matters , but its primary function would be to serve as a referral body for appeals on administrative decisions on seismic safety matters made to regular planning appeal bodies such as the Zoning Administrator, Board of Appeals, and the Board of Supervisors. It might also serve as a referral panel for the administration of the building code." The seismic safety administrative referral panel is an essential part of any effective Seismic Safety Program, and should be formed as soon as possible. While sufficient time has not been available to adequately review and comment on the documents, it is obvious that they will be very useful. In general, the technical data and its planning iniplica- tions are presented very well. However, some minor technical points have been identified which we feel should be resolved. It is felt that this is not the place to consider these technical 004 '72 Contra Costa County -2- Sept. 16, 1975 Planning« Commission questions, but that they could be better resolved by a meeting similar to the meetings between Mr. Zahn and the Advisory Review Croup. We are requesting that such a technical meeting be scheduled. It- should be possible to meet and resolve the technical questions prior to the October 7, 1975 Planning Commission Meeting. This would also provide time to adequately review and comment on the Seismic Safety Element. Very my yours Charles L. T ylor 2608 Fahey Ct. Pinole, CA 94564 '/7 Frank E. McClure 54 Sleepy Hollow Lane Orinda, CA 94563 a 002'73 i 1.-..•.: "\..y.. .- ,r - :... �. STAFF-,RESPONSE-'--;1IiZ # x • . �.� +y�, - rti`�c °2- �,. a.. 4� ^ ', xr:` it s :f r z `'V �� b„ .;a:'' 'Cr1 ' ... ..::fir_ ...•§�':,. .., 002'73 k. Pt'kr f}t:7,7-1177 7 �"r*" ` STAFF_RESPONSE Seismic Safety-Element Letter } Charles L. Taylor and Frank E. McClure; September 16, 1975 °' y r �� No written response is required for this communication because r' � the Planning Commission acted on its rima- recommendation; P Y v, , calling for meetings between the Advisory Review Panel and staff, } at,.the hearing of September 16th. As a' result, the meetings 'of' ` September 24th and 29th were held and the October 7th Panel Com- i.y'F munication to the Commission- was developed. • .0., r,} t ;�` }�.k- fit. �,,. .���,•,•.. ^a-� s .r a + JI i •1y*1�1.\,. ,.'pwr,?s1MM R,. ;: E+,..HS s'6t�4'T�'� $., tS g.s ar ��t. '` •. � •+u4� � �fir[' k 'I' 9 �. � (. �^- Z•�••� � — k"'k"- •ci•.•-. .� f••!+^«.��.,c' 3r Vit. cs rF.: ....• ,. *",�,� tY"+� "" § h r .rl. J-, •twcX: } ?,Tf wy.;.'K"k•. 1F` ,' �. ..+ i, - T •�, roc +� aY'r • y. y- y . 4 s 00274 ALIM Ent Day Division Central Division ASSOCIATED BUILDING IINDUSTRY Nifil44"711 (4151283-9261 Of Nat hwn Cafilornia a 3462 Ak Diabla Boulevard a Late"tte,Cn 94549 } October 14, 1975 Honorable Chairman and Members Planning Commission Contra Costa County Martinez, California Dear Commissioners: Enclosed for your information is a copy of our statement to you at the public hearing October 7, 1975 concerning the draft Seismic Safety Element. -- Those of you present at that meeting were given the referenced material provided by Building Code Action, a building industry research and code advisory activity_ Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Respectfully, .a crs Dean P. La Field .��• `+-y Executive vice President • - rr DPLF:j ••, ryr enclosure cc. Anthony A_ Dehaesus, Director of Planning 00277 DIVISION OFFICES WEST BAY SOUTHERN EASTBAXICENTRAL. NORTHERN San Frandwo Santa Clara t dsvnta Saner Rom x East gats Division Central Division (415)444-8711 t415i 28251 a� Irl EE3 3t�}'L„i"ui:iti o i:+t!"J:3�-� ::"! .. o l,atay¢ .Ca.94549 "I Dl N01Mern Ca jornia b 3462 fAL Diablo goutevard presentation to Cossion Contra Costa county the DPLF:j +_ enclosure Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning DIVISION OFFICES WEST BAY SOUTHERN 0027aSan Francies Santa Dara EAST BAY/CENTRAL NORTHERN Lafayette Santa Rose East Bay Division Centra!D►vision (4151444-8711 (415)283-8251 Of Northern California o 3462 Mt.DiaWa boulevard o Lafayette,Ca.94549 Presentation to Contra Costa County Planning Commission on the Draft Seismic Safety Element by Dean P. La Field, Executive Vice-President ABI, Eastern Division Thank you for continuing the public hearing on this matter. While three weeks and one day is a short time to respond to such a com- plex and comprehensive proposal, we are prepared to provide you with comment and recommendations this evening. The fact that we do have comment to make In no way is to be con- sidered a lack of concern on our part for public safety—nor is it to be considered as a personal critique of either the planning staff or anyone else involved with the preparation of the Technical Background Report or the Element itself. Instead, and quite properly, we are reacting to documents that have the potential of further impacting and possibly unnecessarily restricting the construction industry's ability to provide shelter and other necessary commercial and industrial facilities at prices that the consumer and investor can afford_ At the last public hearing the Director of Planning expressed his ` concern with some comments made about the Element.—and noted that .it was a requirement mandated by the state_ We know that the Element is mandated—as are Noise, Safety, Housing, etc. , elements_ But that is not the point. The point is how the county has re- sponded to that mandate in the draft Element. It is a matter now or only the county's draft—its content, the necessity for its proposals—and its cost impact. A major criticism of the draft Element is that it fails to suffi- ciently emphasize the Fact that there are already existing state and other regulations dealing with the matter of seismic safety. Ile are concerned with avoiding any unnecessary or duplicating county regulations in this field—or study in fields presently or proposed.to be pre-empted by the state. To illustrate, current developments are subject to: 1. EIR's which consider geology_ 2. The requirements of the Alquist-Priolo Geologic Hazard Zone Act_ Page 1 of 3 002'76 DIVISION OFFICES WEST BAY SOUTHERN EAST SAY/CENTRAL :AOR:HERN San Francisco Santa Data Latayatte Santa Rarer i Presentation to CCC Planning Commission Draft Seismic Safety Element by Dean P. La Field October 7, 1975 Page 2 of 3 3. Subdivision Map Act (soils.report) . 4. Public Report. S. Building Code requirements. 6. Planning staff review. 7. Building Department review. _ and when involved: 8. HUD-FHA soils report requirement. (All apply to residential development— several to commercial/industrial.) I have for you a two-page commentary by Building Code Action, with exhibits, which stresses some of these very points. (Attachment. ) It deals with the provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act, the Uniform Building Code, and State Fire Marshall rules and regula- tions dealing with high-rise buildings. .. A further criticism of the draft Element relates to its numerous proposals for implementation and county studies to be undertaken. For example, it actively promotes an on--going next few years pro- gram (pg. 56) and advocates staff and funding to undertake it. in its own words (on page 59)•, it says with respect to Project Reviews: "The basic recommendations here are that' the Seismic Safety Element be utilized to its fullest in performing project reviews and that the County give a high priority and ade- quate staffing to this effective package of programs. " It further advocates: (Pg. 47) "Until such time as the standards (seismic design requirements) are comprehen- sively revised, it would appear appropriate for local units of government to consider adopting interim standards which would pro- vide for a higher level of public safety. " (Ie refer you to previously distributed materials on building code.) ©0277 Presentation to CCC Planning Commission • Draft Seismic Safety Element by Dean P. La Field October 7, 1975 Page 3 of 3 Seismic- Safety Element be utilized to zts fullest in performing project reviews and that the County give a high priority and ade- quate staffing to this effective package of programs. " It further advocates: (pg. 47) "Until such time as the standards (seismic design requirements) are comprehen- sively revised, it would appear appropriate for local units of government to consider adopting interim standards which would pro videfor a higher level of public safety. " (tie refer you to previously distributed materials on building code.) �t3�G► t i C Presentation to CCC Planning Commission • Draft Seismic Safety Element by Dean P. La Field October 7, 1975 - Page 3 of 3 (Pg. 48) . Drafting a work program to study hazardous structures if the state does not prescribe such a program--as has been recommended. (Pg_ 61). Numerous county ordinances to be adopted or amended. our concern is this: While it may be argued that adoption of the Element in this form provides a guide only, the fact that all of these and other implementation recommendations are in the Element tends to "cast them in concrete"--and give them credence and, certainly, momentum. Trde object because (1) nowhere is there a discussion of the cost i.rtaact of the proposals; (2) as already stated, we are concerned with duplication of regulation; (3) the count.1 is already, and may further be, pre-empted in seismic safety regulation--ALGID-- most importantly, once the Element is adopted, no one will nor can clearly "have his hand on the throttle" as this outlined .program "cannonballs down the track. " While we would prefer to see some substantial amendments to the draft, we simply have had too short a time to approach the matter that way. And, realistically, at this point of time, it is im- probable that such rewriting can be achieved. We do, however, urge you to take the following action which we feel is the next best alternative. Ile propose: When you do approve the Seismic Safety Element, that in your resolution to the Board. of Supervisors noting your action, you include the following recommended wording.- (Attachment) . ording:(Attachment.) . Unen you do this, you will not be diminishing the purposes of the Element, but you will be making provision for any implemen- tation program to be carefully and thoroughly considered and evaluated in the light of conditions at that time. lie hope for your favorable action on this recommendation. Thank you. DPL-:g attachments (2) 00278 M East lay Division Centra!Division �+�.'��.�tr=•r��t. GUILOiMG &M! L1.3s t (415)444.8711 (415)22,2-8251 0/ Northern California 0 3452 Mt Diablo Boulevard s, Latayette,Ca.94549 Recommended Wording for PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION re Seismic Safety Element The Seismic Safety Element is a public information document intended to be used as a guideline_ Dile the Element deals extensively with impleimertation reco,m- mendations, it is expressly understood that before any imple- mentation proposal is effected, a thorough study and review shall be made by the staff as to the necessity for the proposal, giving particular attention to then existing or proposed Federal., State, and Building Code regulations and requirements. The purpose of such review is to avoid duplication of regulation, to fully evaluate the necessity for the proposal, and to pre- clude placing an unnecessary or excessive burden on either the public or private sectors or the consumer. The results of such review shall be reported in writing and made available and distributed to all affected parties. Each such report shall include commentary on the cost impact of the pro- 'posal to the County and private sector_ If the report includes a recommendation for implementation of the proposal, the matter shall be the subject of a public hear- ing prior to its promulgation. 002'79 DIVISION OFFICES WEST BAY SOUTHERN EASTBAY/CENTRAL NORTHERN San Francisco Sana Data Lafaysm Santa Ro-a i s , r i 10, RECEIVED - EXHIBIT C ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT OCT; 1975 SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT / J. t oessoHi A. INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSUN CLM • - ' 7K 8, 1. Project Description The proposed project is the (adoption of) the initial Seismic Safety Element of the Contra Costa County General Plan. The planning area for the element is the whole of Contra Costa County. It was chosen to provide-uniform information for all agencies and organizations within its boundaries. The County government, however, has jurisdiction to implement the Element _ in most respects only in the unincorporated area. As a component of a local (City or County) general plan, thw Seismic Safety Element is essentially a long-range policy guide that addresses public and private development. 'The Seismic Safety Element is a public policy (mandated by State planning law) for relating a local unit of government's programs for land use planning, the provision of public improve- ments, and the development (or redevelopment) of land to its seismic characteristics. Although attention has been given historically to the performance of buildings,aind structures during earthquakes, comparatively little attention has been given to the subjects of how land uses should be distributed, or building developments laid-out, on a seismically•active ' landscape. This is the realm of the Seismic Safety Element, and it promises to be a field for innovation for years to come. The Seismic Safety Element is particularly important to Contra Costa County because the County is located in one of the most seismically active areas of California. It is subject to severe ground shaking, ground failure, and flooding from earthquakes occurring both within the County and the Bay Area, and it is additionally subject to ground rupture from earth- quakes on a number of faults located within the County. Further, the potential for earthquake damage is increasing as the County grows in population and as development extends into higher risk areas such as certain of the hill areas and natural flood-plain areas. The Seismic Safety Element was prepared to further several long-range and on-going goals of Contra Costa County; these are: - -1- Microfilmed with boord "order 01!1280 a. To prevent the loss of human life from seismic causes. , b. To minimize serious injuries to human beings from seismic causes. . C. To facilitate the provision of essential services follow- ing a disaster from seismic causes. d. To reduce damage to property from seismic causes consis- tent with (balanced against) financial capability, quality of life, and environmental quality. e. To facilitate recovery from a disaster from seismic causes. To achieve these goals, the Seismic Safety Element includes these objectives: a. To comply with Section 6S302 of the California Government Code requiring cities and counties to include Seismic Safety Elements in their General Plans. b. To provide a basis for better considering earthquake - hazards and other hazards in public and private decision 'Waking. C. To incorporate earthquake hazards, and other hazards, into the considerations of the General Plan and its several component elements. d. To provide a basis for contingency planning for redevelop- sent following a severe earthquake or other disaster. e. To provide a basis for including knowledge of earthquake hazards and other existing or potential hazards into consideration in zoning, subdivision, and other develop- ment ordinances. f. To provide a basis for including knowledge of earthquake hazards and other hazards in mandatory referrals, envir- onmental .impact statement reviews, and other project reviews. g. To provide a basis for updating local emergency services plans in terms of post-disaster response and recovery. The Seismic Safety Element is based on its Technical Background Report which was prepared by the County Planning Department and critiqued, in a draft version, by an advisory panel of persons knowledgeable in the fields of geology, seismic safety -2- 00281 r .x. 3 and building. The Element is largely a summary of the Technical Background Report and includes the latter's formal findings, policies and recommendations. The Element identifies the County's Seismic Safety problems as the following: a. Earthquake Fault Displacement. b. Ground Shaking and Ground Failure. C. Liquefaction. d. Flooding. e. Structural Failure. f. Location of Facilities. It further finds that it is probable that structures built in Contra Costa County will be subject to one or more damaging earthquakes during their useful lives. The Element contains an implementation program that addresses improved mapping, improved monit3ring of earthquakes and the improvement of building and development ordinances, but which places first importance on the utilization of seismic informa- tion in the project review process. 2. Environmental Impact Report Level of Detail This Environmental Impact Report is written on a generalized level of detail for the following reasons: a. The Secretary for Resources' Guidelines for the Prepara- tion of Environmental Impact Reports provide that EIR's for General Plan components may be generalized. b. Many of the Seismic Safety Element's land use and facility location recommendations will be implemented in the course of updating "area" plans under the County's Com- munity Planning Program. These comparatively detailed parts of the County General Plan typically will have _ their own Environmental Impact Reports. C. It is expected that most development projects will have their own EIR's prepared for them, and these EIR's will address Seismic Safety at levels of detail appropriate to the projects and their settings. -3- 009Q0 d. The Seismic Safety Element itself is largely environ- mental subject matter: it addresses the. relationship be- tween land use and the landscape, as this is affected by seismicity. 3. Environmental Inventory by Region a. Physical Description Contra Costa County includes over 800 square miles of which 735 square miles are land area. The County is characterized by shoreline plains and bluffs along the west and north coasts, the northwest-southeast trending Coast Range and Diablo Range separated by relatively narrow linear valleys and, in the east County, •a portion of the Great Valley of California including 'reclaimed lands of the San Joaquin River Delta. The geologic and.' seismic nature of the County are discussed in the third chapter of the Element. b. Existing Use and Surrounding Area As of April 1, 1975, over 172,000 County residents lived in the unincorporated County. This represents thirty percent of the total County population of 581,500. Residential areas are typically single family frame dwellings at densities of one to six units per acre constructed on the more nearly level valley floor and coastal plains. Residential areas also exists on steeply sloping land, notably in the Coast Range, and- to a limited extent occur in the east County Delta region on reclaimed "islands" surrounded by levees or on the levees themselves. The vest and north coasts are developed in heavy industry and manufacturing, particularly petroleum refining, although hundreds of shoreline areas zoned industrial are presently in grasslands and marsh. The present development trend of predominantly suburban density single family housing along the shoreline plains and interior valleys is expected to continue. Industrial growth is expected to be moderate but steady with an emphasis on light or "clean" industries which may locate inland as well as in the coastal industrial area. Contra Costa County is one of the nine counties composing the San Francisco Say Area. As such it shares the regional mix of intensely urbanized Bay shore communities and outlying rich agricultural areas. San Joaquin County, adjacent to Contra Costa's Delta on the east, is an • -4- Q0283 son, R2 agricultural county of the Great Valley and Delta. The , entire region is considered seismically active.- B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS - 1. The.Environmental Impact of the Proposed Action a. Short range The adoption of the Seismic Safety Element would not have immediate, direct, and substantial effects on the.environ- went because: i. A General Plan is a policy guide and a proposed implementation program which, typically, are not • implemented directly but indirectly and through subsequent actions and other instruments. ii. The Seismic Safety Element adds no new regulatory or review powers to County government. iii. Most importantly, the Seismic Safety Element (per se) adds no new capabilities or information to County government because the Element recommends primary reliance on "project review" procedures (including the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports for public and private projects, and mandatory • referrals for public projects) which are already in effect. The review process already incorporates the seismic information prepared for this Element in the form of the draft version of its Technical Background Report, and it utilizes the services and expertise of the Planning Geologist (a registered geologist) who prepared the Technical Background Report. The adoption of the Seismic Safety Element will serve to formalize and further sanction the existing process. Also, the Element reports' distribution to a public who is not very familiar with seismicity and its relation to the planning process should have educa- tional value and help make that process more effective. iv. Significantly also, with a few exceptions" Ce.g., fault zones and localized areas subject to liquefac- tion) areas that are likely to be hazardous during earthquakes are likely to be hazardous under natural conditions that occur much more frequently. For example, areas subject to flooding and landsliding. experience these events without earthquake forces. -S- 00284 C b. Intermediate These impacts are anticipated: i. The primacy overall impact of th to the ptamuulg YL"` " re effective. =elation �{;e that process mo tional value and help with a few exceptions• (e•g- also, ect to liquefac- significantly d localized areas sub- during iv. to be hazardous fault zones �t are likely Hazardous under natural tion) areas kely to be For earthquakes are occur ouch ire frequently. real subject to flooding and landsliding- conditions that oaks forces. exap=e2 a events without earthq experience these -S- p0►284 b. Intermediate Range These impacts are anticipated: - - i. The primary overall impact of the Seismic Safety Element (seismic safety review process) on the physical environment will be the keeping of certain localized landscape features that are potentially hazardous during earthquakes in open use. These areas are represented by the land over faults, marginally stable slopes, and localized areas subject to ground failure. This process has been occurring routinely for several years; it is now common'for - new land developments to adjust their designs to avoid building on seismically sensitive landspace features. ii. Some proposed development projects may be abandoned (or radically changed) as a result of the considera- tion of seismic safety information in their early stages through the project review process. These would be projects proposed to be located in areas heretofore thought to be appropriate for development, but found by investigation to be hazardous. The primary result would be the retention of these areas in open uses. iii. Some new community facilities, transportation features, and public works projects probably will be built in different locations as a result of increased atten- tion to seismic factors in locational studies (for project EIR's or otherwise). Most shifts are expected to be localized, as in the choice of an alternative site to avoid an earthquake fault, but some may result in the location of the facilities in other areas. C. Long Range These impacts are anticipated: i. Consideration of seismic and other safety criteria in the course of County General Plan revisions probably will result in some areas previously indi- cated for development to be reclassified to open or less intensive uses. These reclassifications, however, probably would not significantly affect overall population and economic growth prospects for the-County. 0'. 28.5 d. Building Costs I Increased- seismic safety requirements probably will . increase building costs somewhat, but higher standards are expected to have no substantial overall effect on land or property values. However, investigations and reviews contemplated by the Element may discover structural deficiencies or geological hazards which may reduce property values or developmental potentials on individual properties. 3. Energy Impacts That Would Result From Project's Adoption Again, because the Seismic Safety Element is not a physical development project or the sanction for new powers or require= ments, it will have no direct impacts on the use of energy. The possible indirect impacts are contradictory: for example, the Element could result in more dispersed development (more energy consuming ) at a very localized level, but more cohesive development (more energy efficient) when viewed at the scale of the entire County. The Seismic Safety Element alone and at this time is insufficient to tell which will be the dominant effect or to allow the effect to be quantified. 4. Any Adverse Environmental Effects Which Cannot Be Avoided If This Preposal is Implemented; Mitigation Measures Proposed to Minimize The Impacts There are no evident adverse environmental impacts that would result from the adoption of the Seismic Safety Element; there- fore, no mitigation measures are proposed. Adverse economic effects of seismic safety studies and building and development requirements (see preceding sections) are speculative and not directly contingent on the adoption of the Seismic Sarety Element; therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed. S. Alternatives To The Proposed Project a. "No Project" Alternative If the County elected not to prepare a Seismic Safety Element, it would be reasonable to assume that its planning process would be comparatively less sensitive to seismic safety; therefore, public and private development projects would be less likely to avoid hazardous features and hazardous areas. As a consequence, there would be a greater likelihood for damage, injury, and death in the County from a serious earthquake. If the County elected not to adopt a Seismic Safety Element, it would violate State Law and have an incomplete County General Plan. -8- 0012W s b. Implementation by Ordinance Alternative The Seismic Safety Element has placed primary emphasis on project reviews as a means of implementation_ This course allows the planning agency to make maxi== use of existing seismic and geologic information (which often is generalized or imprecise) but it also often requires substantial geologic and engineering investi- gations by the public agency or private firm sponsoring the project. An identifiable alternative would be for the County to impose precise requirements and specifications in adopted ordinances and formal standards for projects to meet. Ideally, this would require the County to make precise advance investigations; for example, to locate and map earthquake faults with the precision necessary for them to be shown on ordinance maps (within a toler ance of a few feet). This alternative was rejected as being both too costly and less effective than the course chosen. C. Unincorporated Area Planning Ared Alternative An alternative open to the County would have been to prepare the Seismic Safety Element for only its unin- corporated area. This alternative might have enabled the County to formulate an Element more rapidly and less expensively and it would serve most of the County's administrative needs. But, such an Element could be misleading if it ignored seismic features and events in the cities, it would not serve the needs of County agencies with Countywide functions (depending on the scope of the cities' elements), and it would not serve the important County role of subregional planning--that is, providing a planning context for the whole of the County_ 6. The Relationship Between Local Short-term uses of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-_ term Productivity By recognizing the importance of identifying geologic and seismic hazards, and by taking the steps to reduce risk to life and property from these hazards recommended by the Seismic Safety Element, the long-term uses of the County's land resources generally will be enhanced. -9- a0 X87 New and existing development in committed urban and suburban areas will be provided with a greater measure of safety by the avoidance of geologically hazardous natural features and by improved structural criteria. In the event of an earthquake, programs discussed in the Element are expected to reduce overall damage and facilitate recovery and redevelopment, thereby increasing the long-term usefulness of developed areas and reducing the need to build in new areas. Impacts on the long-term productivity of presently undeveloped land and water resources are more difficult to evaluate. Within newly developing urban-suburban areas, the impacts would be similar to those already committed areas, except that the opportunities to avoid hazardous features and to build safer structures would be enhanced. In larger areas determined to have a special hazard associated with them (such as flooding or landsliding), prospects for the retention of agricultural and other open uses would be improved. Wetlands in particular are more likely to remain in agriculture or to be placed in preservation areas as a result of seismic safety considerations brought forth in the Element. It should be understood, however, that the Seismic Safety Element by itself seldom determines the General Plan's recom- mendation as to khat use land should be put to. Rather, the Element deals with geologic and structural considerations that . typically constrain land uses in an indirect manner. 7. Any Irreversible Environmental Changes Which mould be Involved in the Proposed Action Should It Be Implemented Adoption and implementation of the Element are not expected to result in direct adverse effects on air or water quality, wildlife, vegetation, soils, or historical and archaeological sites because the Element would not initiate development projects. The Element primarily w?uld provide a seismic frame of reference for the review of development projects initiated by private enterprise and public line agencies, and its primary effect would be to modify their structural or land planning designs. Indirectly, the Element would predominantly benefit the environment by influencing seismically hazardous land to be used for open purposes. However, as noted, the Element also may influence development in more stable areas with consequent irreversible changes there. It should also be reiterated that the Element is concerned directly with the prerequisites for seismic safety, and indirectly with determining land use and characteristics of development. In this context, for example, the Element's first order of concern is to recommend that buildings for -10- human occupancy are not placed over a fault--and, if the land over the fault is retained in a natural state there will be no irreversible change, but there will be if a road or parking lot is built there. r �� has aw .&M..&F4A-le a41d public iine agencies, and its primary effect would be to modify their structural or land planning designs. Indirectly, the Element would predominantly benefit the environment by influencing seismically hazardous land to be used for open purposes. However, as noted, the Element also may influence development in more stable areas with consequent irreversible changes there. It should also be reiterated that the Element is concerned directly with the prerequisites for seismic safety, and indirectly with determining land use and characteristics of development. In this context, for example, the Element's first order of concern is to recommend that buildings for -10- 00288 _ MMM M- Mff , �.. ..,. human occupancy are not placed over a fault--and, if the land over the fault is retained in a natural state there will be no irreversible change, but there will be if a road or parking lot is built there. S. Organizations and Persons Consulted; Documents Utilized This Environmental Impact Report was prepared by the Contra Costa County Planning Department. The Seismic Safety Element is based on the Seismic Safety Element Technical Background Report which was prepared by the Contra Costa County Planning Department. Principal author of the Technical Background Report was W_ Darwin Myers, Planning Geologist, who has a doctorate in Geology from the University of Wisconsin and is a- registered geologist in California. The Technical Background Report, in turn was based on many informa- tion sources which are referenced in that publication and are listed in its bibliography. . i -11- 00289 C ii. As the result of structural studies, a large number (but not proportion) of existing structures may require rebuilding or even removal. These actions could alter the population density or intensity of land use in localized areas. iii. In the event of a damaging earthquake, follow-up studies on geologic conditions and structural condi- tions could result in the redevelopment of some localized areas into different population densities or land uses. 2. Economic Impacts That Mould Result From The Project's - Adoption Because the Seismic Safety Element is not a physical develop- ment project and provides no new pokers, it is not expected to have direct economic impacts. It could have indirect economic consequences, although these are not inevitable and their magnitudes cannot be determined at this time. These indirect impacts include: a. Reduced Earthquake Damage Appropriate consideration of seismic information in land development and building mould be expected to substantially reduce damage, injuries, and deaths in the event of a serious earthquake, with consequent economic benefits. b. Reduced Recovery Problems Similarly, appropriate consideration of seismic information in building and development could aid the recovery process and restoration of the local economy following a serious earthquake. c. Application Costs The Seismic Safety Element could lead to more and more thorough soils, geologic and engineering studies in connection with development projects, with attendant costs. On the other hand, the information prepared for the Seismic Safety Element could also reduce the costs of studies for project EIR's and other application requirements. It should be noted that the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones Act requires geologic studies in certain areas independently* of the Seismic Safety Element. -7- 00290 OEM t' • C( RA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR( 'NT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415)22 x8BR naocx 372-2035 Phone EIR Contact Person James W. Cutler Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SEISMIC SAFETY ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN The project consists of the Seismic Safety Element of the Contra Costa County General Plan. The Element identifies several types and degrees of seismic hazards in the County and presents policies and recommenda- tions for their avoidance and mitigation of risks. It is determined from initial study by of the Planning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. r---- Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg_ Pine h Escobar Streets Martinez, California Date PostedA,.c ,.sT 21_ 1 ti7.S Final date for review/appeal- Yr-,,, z?T7� By Hing Department Representativ a AP9 1/74 00120191 P a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California In the Natter of Uniform Ailouance For RESOLUTION 110. 75/ 1 034 Certain County Employees The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES that: 1 . This Board having received a recommendation from the Employee Relations Ufficer on the desirability of authorizing the provision of uniform allowances to certain County employees via resolution instead of by ordinance, and after notification by the Employee Relations Officer to employee organi- zations concerned; 2. Tris Board having on ;iovember 18, 1975 adopted Ordinance Uo. 75/48 re- pealing Section 36-8.1602 "Allowances - Uniform" of the County Ordinance Code effective December 18, 1975; 3. Employees in the represented classifications of Coroners Aide, Senior Sheriffs' Jispatcher, Sheriffs' Dispatcher, Sheriffs' Services Assistant, Sheriffs' Technician, and Storekeeper who are required to wear a uniform pursuant to Sheriffs' Office Departmental requirements, shall continue to receive the $20.00 per month uniform allowance authorized by the prior ordinance provision; 4. This board having on Govember 24, 1975 adopted Resolution 75/928 pro- viding for a uniform allowance of $22.50 per month for incumbents of classi- fications represented by the Deputy Sheriffs Association who are required to wear a uniform, and also having adopted Resolution Ho. 75/592 providing . for compensation of unrepresented County employees; 5. For tite month of December 1975, employees in the classes of Deputy Sheriff, Deputy Sheriff-Fatale, and Sergeant and, unrepresented County employees in permanent positions in the Sheriffs Office, Harshal 's Office and County Service Area P-1 wi.0 receive a uniform allowance shall be paid a uniform allowance of $25.00; 6. Effective January 1, 1976, the monthly uniform allowance paid to employees in the classes of Deputy Sheriff, Deputy Sheriff-Fecale, and Sergeant and to unrepresented County wployees in permanent positions in the Sheriffs Office, Marshal 's 0ffices, or County Service Ivrea P-1 who wear a uniform pursuant to departmental requirement shall be 522.50, subject to the initial approval of the County Administrative Officer upon recocr:endation of the Department Head. PASSED and ADOPTED b;' the Board on December 16, 1975. cc : Counz;y Service Area n-1 c/o Count;, Sheriff-Coroner County Sheriff-Coroner 1-"un;cipal Court Marshals Count%, Auditor-Controller Direc Lor of Personnel Count ► Counsel County Administrator (P) R-ESOLUTION NO. 75/1034 0 X92 e. h MNE - - Iff T9E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF - • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,- STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Fatter of Completion RESOLUTION MO. 75/1035 of irprovem5-hts and declaring j certain road(s ) as Countyy road(s) Subdivision 4506, f j Walnu-t - Creek-'-Area. - - N to r•i " WHEREAS the Public Alorks Director having notified this E a, Board that construction of :- - >e improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4506, Walnut Creek - z° > area, as provided in the agreerqnt heretofore executed by this E 0 Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map- p w ° 11014, THMEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the . following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of . establishing a to al period for filing of liens in case of - action under said Subdivision Agreement: � Subdivision - Date of A�reemsnt - l.� bO - Cd - - - w 4506, Walnut Creek Area November 13, 1973 o Insurance Company of North America n� Bond No. M 85 30 '85 r 3 Cd BE IT FURTRER RESOLVED that- the $500 cash deposit as surer o {Auditor 2 s receipt No. 112418 dated--November 9, 1973 ) be Z RETALINED for one 'year pursuant to the requirements of 4 0 Section 94-4.11,O6 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described road(s), - $:4 as sho►•rn and dedicated for public use on the crap of Subdi'.-Ision 0 4506 filed November- 14, 1973 in Book 165 of map* at page 1 Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California' (i_sT — (are) accented and declared to be County Road(s) of Contra Costa ' 'o County N . 0 Candelero Drive Candelero Court (36/56/0-01) Candelero Court (32/33/0.01) - Candelero Place (32/33/0.01) - Treat Boulevard Widening - PASSED by the Board on December- 16, 1975. - - cc: Recorder Subdivider Public Works Director RESOLUTION 1:0. 75/1035 0() - VII-ENRFCURPjD, R:�ssni; AF- 6n*7"o.Ta em rrr>>►N•��• r�Y.. ��:�_.. TO CLERK L'Ut qD OF at o'clock SUPERVISORS' H.Contra Costa County Records J. R. OLSSOU, County Recorder Fee . S Official DOARD OF SUPERZ'ISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFOWTIA . In the Matter of Accepting and Giving ) RESOLUTIO'sT OF ACCEPTANCE Notice of Completion of Contract with ) and NOTICE 0. CO :PLElIO�T Malpass Construction Co v T (C.C. 33086, 3093) Work Order 539 ) RESOLUTION HO. x/1036 . The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County PXSOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on April 2, 1274 contracted with Malpass Construction Company, Inc. , 503 Waterberry Drive, Pltasant Hill r flame and Address of Contractor for construction of the Multi-Use Btuildincr at t e anvenlie Hall � . Complex, Martinez area Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of with Wisconsin as surety, (Ila-me of Bonding Company for work to be performed on the grounds of the Cou:.ty; and The Public: forks Director reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of December 16, 1975 Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Couaty Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract. - An-extension of contract time from September 1, 1975 to December 163 - • 1975 is granted. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON December 16, 1975 • CERTIFICATION and ITRIF ICATIO1 I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolu- tion and acceptance duly adopted and entered on the minutes of this Board's meeting on the above date. I declare under penalty of perjury that th.c foregoing is true and correct. Dated: December 16•, I Q75 J. R. OLSSO , County Clerk & at Martinez, California ex officio Clerk.. of the Board By N., In ah -m eputy Clerk cc: 1iocorc ana reLurn Contractor Auditor Public tort Adinini::trator RESOUIT1011 Y.O. 75/1036 00 W94 . • • i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 040 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U;e: Flex-Time Plan; ) lexible :porn hours ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/1037 on Departmental basis ) The Board RESOLVES as follows: 1. Authorization. Subject to the provisions of this Resol.u- tion, County departments are authorized in their discretion to establish flexible time ("flextime") employee work scheduling plans on a trial basis. 2. . Definitions. As used herein the following terms have the following definitions: A. Flextime Plan: A "flextime plan" is a departmental *!an by :which County employees are permitted to have, within cer- tain limits, a _flexible Cork schedule working a minimum of' -an eight-hour work day. B. Core Time: "Core time" is 'that period of time in a o►_kday, dur ng which all employ;ee on a flextime p?an in a depa.rt- nent (or subdivision; thereof*) are required to be at work. C. Department-: "Department" includes any office, agency, or subdivision thereof des-ignated by the appointing authority for this purpose. • D. Appointing, Authority: "Appointing authority" includes anyone he designates for this purpose. 3. Administrator's Approval. Written approval of the plan by the County Administrator is required before a department may implement a flextime plan. 4. Recuirements. A flextime plan must meet the following minimum requirements. A. Employees on the flextime plan must schedule their hours in advance, subject to the written approval of the appointing authority. Such approval shall be at the discretion of the appoint- ing authority based on the needs and convenience of the department, including, but not limited to the schedules of other personnel, the meed to keep an office open to the public, the departmental work- lcat., and the manning of of z ice:. and telephones. B. Flextime plan hours mu:,.t Include core time of at least :'ive hour.-z cer day. C. Frorls.lon small be made for a mea? period. D. E'mPle,17eezz on a zlextl=c—• uian must work eight hourz ?',.n:j fcrx ;3': :•:' per .. %: '::'e«::. Employee-o ` r, s., s flc.z�:r.:E.• a . l �u at ti-,e 3.•+ ..".: Lei r .. c� L t.', ppo t � r "`+; �? � _ r�•s2L Il::� author; t:. �J �",F+ �. z In to the t.i.e .'-`,±i:a:i is r'�."�' .. in ."uch a -aze theerrmlj. el.; .. .. z. .. a;.. .+:.1ftir L. e .s a iaii:.. .i+ thWLerk MJ� ✓ a.iJ u* tetra o r u 1 1 .V f 4.a`.. -A- 00295 ..,...c;.:.,in,.,>.N...,cr..;ar'SL.r: ,�n.,_ .. :_ µ .. .. :.. '"'T'?ih_r. .} ..Z k,• .. Overtime i s `any, authorized work time In excess of 40� "Our$ Pel workweek. Overtime sha..l.l be authorized only in accord- ance nit:3 tike CountR. Adminizt-r2tor'j regulations. 5- Regulatlo=. The County Administrator may promulgate regu- lations 1��:Lzmen�.3n� his resolution. 5• Effective Date. This resolution shall be effective on and ;after December i6,-1975. PASSED on December 1521975, unanimousl,V by the' :Supervisors present. cc: All Department Heads F.ESCei,��xl4� 2dU. � 10 VL - 000295 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Decerher 16 . 19 75 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. . Mr. Mack 8ernstine , 3316 Grove Street, Oakland, California 94600, by and through his attorneys , Conklin , Davids & Friedman, F.D. Box 99406, San Francisco, California 941^1 , having filed with this Board on !'ovember 18, 1975 a claire, a portion of which is net acceptable for filing because it was not filed within the time limits specified in novernment Code Section 911 .2 ; and County Counsel having advised that said claim should be accepted for f;line only as to that part which is for actionable injury occurring within the time limits specified in the afore- said 6cvernment Code section; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the portion of said claim which was timely filed is hereby €1ENIED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c• Claimant wdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Attn: "r. Broatch affixed this 1Fth day of ^ecember, 19 75 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County administrator By �,� ' 'Crr., / Deputy Clark County Sheriff-Coroner � Po hie x ' i erre f` George Hills Company , Insurance Adj,.sters 001207 H 24 8/75 IOU a TO: COUNTY OF ALAMEDA c/o Clerk, Board of Supervisors 1221 Oak Street Oakland, California 94612 ' LE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE D 1421 Washington NOV Z 8 1975 Oakland, California 94612 J. ILoLSSON CHIEF OF POLICE tCLERIC eoARg) OE A,veAv SOBS 455 - 7th Street Oakland, California 94607 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA c/o Clerk, Board of Supervisors P.O. Box 911 Martinez, California 94553 CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 27th and Barrett Richmond, California 94804 CHIEF OF POLICE 27th and Nevin Richmond, California 94804 RE: MACK BERNSTINE YOU, AND EACH OF YOU, WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned hereby serves and makes demand upon you for the cause and aaount set forth in the folliwng claim. CLAIMANT'S NAME: MACK BERNSTINE, 3316 Grove Street, Oakland, California. MAILING ADDRESS: % CONKLIN, DAVIDS & FRIEDMAN, Attorneys at Law, 1200 Gough Street, Suite 9, P.O. Box 99406, San Francisco, California 94109. TELEPHONE NUMBER: (415) 673-0300 AMOUNT OF CLAIM: Special damages and expenses proximately caused by the occurrence described below and general damages in the sum of FIFTY THOUSRND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) . PLACE OF OCCURRENCE: Various places in the County of Alameda, County of Contra Costa, City of Oakland, City of Richmond, including, but not limited to, Oakland Cit_ Jail, Richmond City Jail, and Contra Costa County Jai?. -1- 00029 ern R.._ n,,,.;,,R IF-IF- period of approximately ataug Wei r-lr i g :tiUU�>.A!ND DOLI+•z1RS ($50,000.00) . PLACE OF OCCU"XNCE: Various places in the county Of Alameda, County of Contra Costa, City of Oakland, city Of Richmond, including, but not limited to, Oakland City Jail, Richmond City Jail, and Contra Costa County Jail_ -1- 09� 11 DATE OF OCCURRENCE: During the period of approximately July 23, 1975, and continuing thereafter and including until approximately September 10, 1975. DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE: Employees, servants and agents of the City of Richmond, City of Oakland and the County of Contra Costa and County of Alameda; including but not limited to Sergeant Oliver, Officer Delville, Detective Smith, Officer Keller, Detective Phillips, Officer Merchado, Officer Gruen, Officer Thornberry, Officer Lewis, Officer Lusk, Officer Taylor, and each of them, negligently and ` carelessly and/or wantonly, wrecklessiy, wilfully, maliciously and intentionally caused claimant to be falsely arrested and imprisoned for a period of approximately two (2) weeks and to be falsely charged with a crime, to wit: violation. of Section 211 of the Penal Code -- Robbery. Dated: November 17, 1975 CONKLIN, DAVIDS & FRIEDMAN By �7. MICHAET FRIEDMAN -2- 001299 CONKUN, DAVIDS 8 FRIEDMAN ATTORNCV3 AT LAW JOHN J. DAV/OS CATMCORAL HILL [AST OTMtA O///c[x OCHHIS O.CONKLIN 1200 GOYGH STRECT, SUITC 0 TM AVIV ISRACL MICHAEL FR1EDNAN SAN FRANC=CAUFORNU 94W9 PIMALUMA,"A' FORNU1 (4131 073-0300 uaLc taco November 17, 1975 -s T RECE'l r V LD COUNTY of Comm COSTA NOV 8 1975 % Clerk, Hoard of Supervisors L a-KON P.0. Box 911 aW eOAM of WERVISO76 Martinez, California 94553 i Re: Mack Bernstine Gentlemen: Enclosed please find the Claim of our client, Mack Bernstine. Please forward all correspondence to this office. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter. Yours very truly, CONKLIN, DAVIDS & FRIEDMAN MICHAEL FRIEDMAN MF/nc Enclosure Certified mail Return Receipt Requested 00300 I r if, rE BOARD OF Sul-Lrx is",5 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for the Storage Addition to ) December 16, 1975 Edgar Childrenst Shelter, ) Martinez, California. (Work Order 5255) ) Bidder Total Amount Bond Amounts Sal Cola Construction Company $16,985.00 Labor k Malts. $ 82492-50 14980 C Pacheco Boulevard Faith. Perf. $16,985.00 Martinez, California 91553 (Base Bid Only) Armer/Norman & Associates, Walnut Creek Madsen Construction Co. , Napa Sinclair Construction Company, Concord Richard Spadino Construction, Martinez . The above-captioned project and the specifications tnerefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; - IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and inaterials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good and suf.''icient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTYM ORDE±?r.D that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together r:ith bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved theca as to fora, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. PASSM) by the Board on December 16,x_ 1975 • CLR'nnED COPY I certify that im, L-% a full, true 4 correct copy of the origieal st wu=--ut ehteh Is on file in my office. and tint It was lw%*rd & adopted by the llwwd of SuprrrL=osa of Contra Ccs to C.wanty. Cettfornta, on the date *noun.ATTES-T: J. It. UI,-SO.N. County Clerk 4"Wilcto Cluk of"d Board of Ssperw6ore, ee: Public Works Director by DtVM ler:. County Counsel Q E C 16 1975 County Auditor Contractor 00- 3-01- Form 9.1 Rev. b- t t coiriac� (Construction Agrcement:) (Contra Costa county Standard corn) i-t be exonerated -i,u Aaiy "" ..uu, _U PASSE by the Board on December 162 1975 CL•R-nnED COPY 1 cecdify that 11.6 is :6 full. true & corrM copy of the ortrtml � txrSst mhtrh 14 on the to my otflee. ttad that 1t ua> ttiy`:rd L adopted by the R03rd of ape, of of Contr► l'o;ti ('.x:nty. Calffornta, on the date eho+►n. ATta�r. J. U. pox. county Clark&rs{.fitciu Cluk cf"d hoard of s', fore. D1 Deputy ler':. cc: Public Works Director � 1 1975 County Counsel "- County Auditor Contractor 00301 rorlp 9-1 W , COlaRACT t - . (Construction Agreement) (Contra Costa County Standard corm) These special terms are incorporated below by reference. (yy2,3) Parties: (Public .,Lgcac.vl cowRA COSTA rotwy Sal Cola Construction Co. [Contractor) 49800 Pacheco Blvd. Martinez. CA 94553 Comp ete legal name (54 effective :lata: December 16, 1975 [See 54 for starting state.) (S3) 7-sc 3Fork: Storage Addition to Edgar Children's Center, 100 Glacier Drive, Martinez, California, W.O. 45255. Base Bid all in accordance with the plans, drawings, and specification or general conditions, prepared by or for the Public Works Director, and in accordance with the accepted bid proposal. Oi4j Corptetion .iaa: (strike out (a) or (b) and "calendar" or "working"i ( (b) Within 60 calendarfiA302214 stays from starting state. US) Liquidace.d .,anc.9a3: S 25_QQ per calendar day. (SO Public lgtncg's Agaat: p thl ie wnrkc ili re'-t0= (57) Contract Oric1:f 5 16 9A5 nn (for unit price contracts: more or less, in accoruanoe vithfiasshed quantities at unit bid prices.) . (Strike out enthetical material if inappli.cable.l 2sc,tic Ate. nc+., b /// (President, chairman or other or 'a uesignated Representative) Public Works Director Dom! Contractor, hereby also ac' nowledging awareness of and compliance with Laijoz Coue�, 2 concCfs%nWortrsen' Cocspensation Law. ity: �.�11t (CORPORATE ucsi.gnatc tca.al capacity in tste businessj SEAL) lly: De.-i.gnate official capacity in the ussness Jlote to Contractor (2) .:rPcute ae::ro_•de.r r:.rt ;ore, belOu, and (2) if a corpora- tion, affi= Corporal.: C..:3. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of California ) 4CZJO1LK0,—::B:I7 (by Corporation, county of ��v 7�d,a (`n crw ) Partnership, or Individual) The person(s) signing above for Contractor, known to me in individual and business capacity as se = today and acknowledged that he/they c::ocutect it ane that the corporatisns,or pare#ershiu nar-a above executed it. hated: J.7.ii i c, 7•s - :l tart' Public - - - - - - - - - - .. - PUfi 111t'I't:01'LD: J. b. CLAUst;.%# County Counsel, by + !7 rL Leguty (Page 1 of 4) Microfilmed with Board order 00302 `sa 4 n J 3. wulu, L•Oirri:ACT, CIL&UJe;L'S. (a) Uy their siynaturces in Section 2, effective on the above sate:, tituse parties, prot:i and altret! as set forth in this contract, incorporating by these reierences the material ('special terms') in Sec. 1. (b) Contractor shall, at his Gran cor.t and a-:mise, and in a worlstauliLe: =auner, fulls ante faithfully perform and complete tltc wort:; and will furnisa all caterials, labor, services and transportation necessary, cotnenicnt aril proper in order fairly to perform the re luir— nts of this contract, all strictly in accorcianee with the Public Agency's plans, drawings and specifications.. icy The u.rori: can be changed only witst Pu:,lic Agencl*s prior written order specifying such change and its cost agreed to by the parties; and the Public Agency shall never have to pay more than specifics in Sec. 7.wiutout such an order. � - 4., TIBC: - uoTICL To Pnocuo. -Contractor shall start this work as directed in the speci- fications or tae i:otice to Proceo'u; and shall complete it as specified in Sec. 1. a. LIQUIDATED DAi1AGES. If4ae Contractor'-fails to complete titis contract and this work within,ute,tine i:;cti therefor, allowance briny made for contingencies as provided herein, he-itecortes lWule:-to-Lite Public wgt:ncy for all its-loss end danaye therefrom; and because, from the nature of, tA;---ease„it is and will be inpracticagle and extremely difficult to ascertain and fix-the Pteilic Agency's actual damage from any delay in,performance hereof, it is agrecC_twat Contractor will pay as liquidated damages to, the Pualic' Agency 'the reazonablc�:szua sl�beificd• in sec. 1, the result of the parties* reasonable endeavor to estivate fair average compensation-therefor, for each calendar- day's delay in. finishing said worn; and if the same be not paid, Pu:alic Ag•.rncy may, in addition to its other ramcdics. deduct the sane from any cony due or to becore due Contractor under this con- tract. If the Public Agency for any cause authorizes or contributes to a delay, suspen- sion of work or c;tension of tin,_ its duration shall be added to the time allowed for completion, but it shall not be decried a waiver Lnor be used to defeat any right of the Agency to damages for non-co=pletion or dela-,' hereunder. Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 4215, the Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the work. when such delay was caused by the failure of the Public Agency or the owner of a utility to provide foz removal or relocation of existing utility facilities. ti. I1,r_'LG1Uk7 LU 1JOLUii1::.. S. she platt,,.tirawinys and specifications or special provisions of tlxe Public Agency s call for bills, and Contractor's acre ted bid for this work are hereby incorporated i.•tto ttus contract; and they are inters cc. to co-operate, so that any- thittg cz:iziaite:d iu the plans or drawings and not aentioned in the specifications or sp.:cial provisions, or vice: versa, i:: to be a-ecuted as if a_-Abiteu, mentioned-and set forte itt Lott, to tics true intent and Licaning thereof «:ten taken all together; and differences of opinion concerning dhcsc scall finally determined by Public. Agency's Atjent speeif ie:u in Sew:. 1. 7. PAYN1MM (a)- . rorhis strict and literal+fulfilluent of these promises and conditions, an asu compensation for all this work, the Public Agency shall pay the Contractor the suit specified in Sec. 1, except that in unit price contracts the payment shall be for finished quantities at unit bid price's. (13) on or aLout tate first-clay of eaeit calendar month the Contractor shall submit to tite Public .tgeuey a verified applic:atiun for juivitent, supported by a statement showing all materials actually installed duriuy the: pre:cudiny Louta. the labor expended thereon, atmd the coat thereof; w:zereupon, after checking, tho Pui,lic Agency shall issue to Contractor a certificate: for-the amount deternined to be due, minus 10`. thereof pursuant to e;overnt.teut Code sec. 530".7, but not until d.fective wort: and uaterials have been retaoveta, replaced and Halle good. u. PAYIILMS WITHHELD. (a) *.itu Public Agency or its aye nt may withhold any payment, or ecausQ of late=r iscovereti eviuence nullify all or any certificate for payment, to such extent and period of title only ass may bee necessarl to protect the Public Agency from loss b"auso of: (1) vefective wort; not reei.=died, or w&t:%j•:ialceted work, or (2) Llaitis filet: or reasonable eviuence inuicstittil probalalc filing, or (3) failure to pruix:rl_ pas sui,contracturs ur for material or labor, or (4) Reasonai.lt: ciou:,t t:tat toe wort: can i,.: c.-ot.gtlet.ed for tate balance olein or (5) Lange to antsier eo:ttractor, or (u) damage: to the Pulalic Agency, other than damage due to delays. t (b) site Pul,lic Age acy shall u:;.- re=asonable di.litsessee to discover and report to the Contractor. as tite work progresses. tilt: tsaterials and la:tor which are ttot satisfactory to it, so as to avoid unttece:;sar} trouble or cost to lite Contractor in =taking good any dcfectiva t:orl: or parts. i (e) 35 calendar days after tate PuLlic :.9ancrs files its. notice: of cowpletion of the entire (['ayc 2 of 4) 011303 •. v i uorl., it shall issue a certificate to tiw Contractor anu pay tae balance of the contract pri<ti after aleeu atin.3 all amounts witishoL t under this contract, provided the Contractor shoes that-all claim- for la:ar and naturials have barn paid, no claims nave i+een prass%utteed to the Puh.lic agency Ismail on acts or asfssiosss of the Contractor, and no liens or withhold notice::: have lu.•en filau against the work or site, and provided there are not caasossauie inuicationss of defective or nizzing work or of lata-recordeat notices of lions or clam against Contractor. 9. Iial,IW". (i.ai.or Code 551OW-eel) un signing this contract, Contractor must give Public .agency (1) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or (2) a certificate of Worksurn's Compensation insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (3) an exact cep•/ or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. Contractor is aware of and complies with Labor Code. Sea. 3700 and the Woricanu's c.'acgxassatioz Lau. 10. ilu-aZ. sin si5ninq this contract Contractor sizall dolivur to Public Agency for app rova good and sufficient bonds with sureties, in anount(s) specified in the specifi- cation. or spaecial provisions, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this contract and his payszaxet for all labor and material•- uarrundaer. 11. ria"IS: ri rutmeu. If t:a: Contractor at any tire refus.ss or neglects, without fault of t..: Pulalic Agency or eta agent(s), to supply sufficient materials or workmen to cacrsletc this agreeaent and cork as provided haemin, for a period of 10 days or more after written notice thereof b; tine Public Agency, Use Public Agency m*y furnish same and deduct the reasoi able expenses th ercof from t:te contract price. 12. %.ttti5 APPLY. cameral. !loth parties recognize this atsi,licability of various federal, • state and 13al lads auu regulations, capsucially Luaptct 1 of Part 7 of the California Labor Code (lsoyinatin% with sec. 17tu, and including Sec.. 1735, 1777.5, i 1777.6 forbidding discrinivation) and intend that thin agrcesacnt cocgslies therewith. Tins parties specifically stipulate Ctat the relevant ponaltio and forfeitures provided in the Labor Code, especially in Secs. 1775 i 1tt13, conaernina, prevailiuq wages assal hour=, shall apply to this agreement as though fully stipsulaw d ho=in. '• 13. SUUCOM-'It t.'WJW. GovernzAant Coei-- gy4140-4113 arae incorporated heroin. 14. ;&u2; Rs TW . (a) Purssantt to Lah,or Carr Sec. 1773, the governing body of the Public ercy nae ascertain ud the gamral provailing rates of w%us per diem, and for holiday and overtax: work, its the locality iu wuie a this wor): is to be performed, for each craft, claassfication, or type of worknan neesieed to execute this contract, and saia rates are as specified in the call for bids for tail work and are an file with the Public Agency, and are urreby isscorrorated heroin. (b) This schedule of wages is Ismail on a working day of 8 hours unless otherwise specified; and the daily rata: is the hourly rates z nitiplied Ivy the number of hours con- stituting tizu working clay. uhs-nc la:— raan that nuctcer of hours are'worked, the daily wage rate is pro sortionataly reedua.:z, nut we huurlf rates raswins as stated. (e:) y w Contractor, antes all :sin suLmsutractorz, suet pat at least twssses rates to all pwsrsunzs on thin wore:, iuclWin g all travel, sussista:uc s, .usd fringe benefit payments proviva d for by aps licable a.•ollaective bargai.zfng agresenents. All skilled labor not listed above must zx: pain at least t:tee wage scale estabLiz.kn. lay collective bargaining agreement for such labor in the locality w.scru such war:: is baeia s pwsrforoa d- If it becowss neces- sary for thus contractor or any sabeontractor to ouploy any puraon in a craft, •elassifi- cation or types of work (exs:a:Ist executive, supervisory, a aiuinistrative, clerical or other nwa-uauual workers as suck) for u tics no nininuu uae;.s r La is specified, the Contractor shall ft.seuxliata:ly notify Ctae Pulalic Ag im-y witic!s s:.tall promptly deterwistes the prevailing waeje rates t.aaerasfor and furseishz thue Contractor wLU& t;sas Ldnsiwua rate based thereon, which shall apply fros.: t:se tine o: Liza: initial cyslorpja tt of tine person affected and during the continuance of ::sac.& c pslo=:4:.ut. 15. litsultS Or Lt1liutt. xiaj:zt Iza.urs of lat,asr in ono calenut sr clay constitutes a legal day's work. asua no aur.s:azz crploj-nd at any Li" o.•s tkis Dor:: If/ tau: Contractor or by any sub- contractor sh zll ba requirea: or pa=itt" to war&': ionjurr t:u:r an except as provided in LaLor Code Sas. 1313-lUE.. 1 14. Properly indentured appra:nticas czy be enpsloyud on tai, work. in accordan+cc Meth Labor Lode Seca. 1777.y and 1777.6, :or:siddi vj discriuination. (rage 3 of 4) OX-1; 1=. 12-73) 00304 17. I•itt.I'Lttt:,tCI: mr. :tATL't:IiUZ. 'ihu Public Agency desirds to promote the industries and vcoaxoiay of Coutra Costa County, anu une Contractor therefore promises to use the products, wuri.c..eu, laborers and mechanics of t;dz County in every case where the price, fitness and quality arm: equal. __ONO 16. ASSIG2I;:I::Ii. :his agrc.eLk nst biuds the heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives of the Contractor; but he cannot assign it in whole or in part, nor any monies due or to Luccx.%u slur under it, witiiout the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the Coutractor's surety or sureties, unless they have waiveu notice of, assignment. 19. ::t) W?aVLIt BY PIT,:.IC At;L.CY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of won: and/or nateris inspeete , or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the Public Agency inc,icating tae work. or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this =%tract, or acceptance of the %Ohole or any part of said work and/or materials, or Iia•;s.s�nnts therefor. or any combination, of these acts, s:n:tll not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall tate Public Agency be tsQreby estopped frora bringing any action for damages or enforsxaent arising from the failure to cc:; �ly with any of Cie terns and conditions hereof. 20. ,nu.v S a I::L't:t--.I:Y. (a) Contractor pro-i:." to and shall hold harmless and indu:usiiy crura tlu: iabilities as defined in this section. (:,) The inderrannitees benefitcu astu protected by this promise ars: the Public Agency and its electives and appointive board--, co&xaisrioIIs, officers, agents and employees. (c) The liabilities protects::, against are any liability or claim for damage of any kisnu allegedly suffered, incurreu or threatened because of actions defined below, including personal injury, death, property manage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, regardless of w:aether or not such liauility, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time n,,.:iore tie Public Agency approved the icprovenent plan or accepted the improvements as caapleted, and including the defense of any suits) or action(s) at law or equity concerning rhes(--. (d) she actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligen- in connection Z-9 ffae matters covereu Irl tois contract anu attributable to the contractor, suijconrractor(s) , or any officer(s), agents) or ecgjloystie(s) of one or more of them. (e) ::on-Conditions: T'ue prorise and agreenennt in this section is not conditioned or dci)enu ent on whether or not any Indermitce has prepare..,-segTplicd, or approved any plans) , drawing(s), sp ecification(s) or sj%ecial provision(s) in conusection with this work, has in::urdnce or otuer inds_r"ufication covering any of t,ae:;e matters, or that the alleged danage resulted partly from any negligent or willful miuconduct of any Indemnitee. .21. L:.CAVM'10a. Contractor shall coesply with tine provi nionnr, of Labor Code Sec. 6422, if apFs la:aL e, ;ay suLuitting to Pui.lic Agency a detailed plan s'.ts,winc� the design of shoring, bracinj, slupinny. or otit.:r provisions to I►^ rade for worLer protection from the hazard of caving Uround during trencis ewcavation. (Page 4 of 4) (CC-1; nev. 1_-73) ��l305 SAYRE & 1 OL 49 Inc. N.If•II•IfI It % RIFICATION OF INSURANCE i 1---Suralnce Inc. County Adminstration Building " 5=�VTEt2 T0: 651 Pine St. :L- �C% 1 1CS15. Q:.w.Lo.�•::�, CA 9 4611 Martinez, CA 94553 (415) 652-2LCGS L J We.the undersigned, hereby verify that the following described insurance is in force at this date,of which o is insured with Underwriters at Lloyd's, London C is insured with Certain Insurance Companies, Loudon, England 100 is insured with Mission Insurance Company Name of Assured: Sal Cola Construction Company Address of assured: 4980-C Pacheco Blvd. , Martinez, CA94553 Storage Addition to Edgar Children's Center, 100 Glacier Dr Location of Risk: Martinez, California, W.O. #5255 Base Bid all in accordance with the plans, Drawing, and specifications or General Kind of Insurance- Conditions, prepared by or for the Public Works Director,* Umbrella Liability Policy or Certificate No: M 82675 Period: From: 4-20-74 To: 4-1-77 Limits of Liability: $1,000,000 Excess of Underlying *and in accordance with the accepted Bid Proposal. By endorsement to Policy No. M 82675, Contra Costa County, its Officers, Employee and Agents are named as Additional Insureds solely as respects the above listed job, subject, however, to all exclusions, limitations and other provisions of the policy. This document is furnished to you as a matter of inforesation only. The issuance of this document does not make the personororganizationtouhom it is issued an additional assure!, nor does it modify in any manner the contract of insurance between the Assured and the Undenwiters. Any amendment, change or extension of such contract can only be effected by specific endorsement attached thereto. For particulars concerning the limitation, cooditions and team of the coverage you are referred to the original Policy or Policies in the possession of the assured. Tne undersigned uill have no responsibility todive notice of cancellation of this insurance except to the extent spe- cifically provided herein,nor aur ue Insurers,hoverer Insrr ncehas been placed by Sayre&Toso,Inc. Should the Above policy be cancelled or materially changed durin the policy period, the Undersigned will give 10 days notice to the SAYR 7 �a 0; above verification holder. ,. ��" Dated at Oakland, CAlifornia December 30 75 19 By /: s S&-T S24-P(rev.10;73.Replaces all editions of S&T X24) `i 3 6 y `. CEIMFICATE OF INSURANCE EXPO I -JRANCE BROKERS, INC_ P.O.SOX�5• 235 W.%,AltnM BOULEVARD County Administrati Building OAKLAND-.rALIFORN M 94611•Tekpiwae: (415)652-2605 .651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 r DATE: December 30, 1975 This ism certify that tine following policies of inwraoas Covering as stated INSURED: Sal Cola Construction Co. are in force as of 12-30-75 .Any requirements or provisions in any i contract or agreement 11010 e- dw Insured and any odner person. firm or corporation shall not en CERTIFICATENUMBER 14 _ large. alter a amend the definition of insured or any other terms or Conditions of d+i: cartifiots or policies f '111habd. LIMITS OF LIABILITY COMPANY EXPIRATION COMBINED SINGLE EACH PERSON AGGREGATE TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY MO. DATE LIMIT EACH OCCURRENCE IIF APPLICABLE? IIF APPLICABLE) IIF APPLICASLE3 BODILY INJURY LIABILITY Mission AUTOMOBILE HAC 21996 4-1-76 100 ,000/300,00 OTHER " " . 300,000 300,000 PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY Mission AUTOMOBILE RAC 21996 4-1-76 100,000 OTHER 100,000 100,000 EXCESS LIABILITY AUTOMOBILE PHYSICAL DAMAGE COMPREHENSIVE ACTUAL VALUE S DEDUCTIBLE COLLISION ACTUAL VALUE S DEDUCTIBLE WORKERS' COMPENSATION Mission STATUTORY EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY WCP 73230- 7-1-76 UNLIMITED IN CALIFORNIA OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA S PROPERTY COVERAGE LOCATION: PERILS: COVERAGE: SUBJECT TO ALL EXCLUSIONS. LIMITATIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY APPLICABLE THERETO. ALL OPERATIONS BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED INSURED AND ALL PREMISES OR PROPERTY USED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED INSURED IN CONNECTION WITH JOB: STORAGE, ADDITION TO EDGAR CHILDREN'S CENTER, 100 GLACIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CA., W.0.t5255 BASE BID ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, DRAWING:, AND SPECIFICATIONS OR GENERAL CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, AND IN ACCORD- ANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL. BY ENDORSEMENT TO POLICY NO. HAC 21996, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES,, AND AGENTS ARE NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS SOLELY .,AS RESPECTS THE ABOVE LISTED JOB, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALL EXCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. THE LIABILITY POLICY INCLUDES COVERAGE FOR HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTS AS PROVIDED IN THE INSUREING AGREEMENTS, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALL EXCLUSIONS, CONDITIONS, A-ND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. This certificate is not a policy and shall not be construed as extending coverage not afforded by the designated policy or by endorse- ment thereto. Should the above mentioned contracts of insunnte be cancelled or materially charmed during the above named polity period. the Undersigned will endeavor to give 10 days written notice to the holder of this document. but failure to give such notice shall impose no oWiption of any kind upon the undersigned or *4 insurance companies, EXP I RAN BROKERS, INC. sMy ItIUVAo BY: i. c: Ksupco AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE • NSUA 4h Cf COM►a.N1Es 00307 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE - EXPO IJ 'TRANCE BROKERS, INC. County AdbairdstratiBnildi>�g P.O.BOX • 235 W.M-ARMWR BOULEVARD ,• .653. Pine Street OAK1.A,ND.CA11FORNIA 94611.Telephont: 1413)652-_>S" M rtines: CA 94553 DATE: DOCeMber 30, 1975 This a to Certify that due following policies of in wane covering as stated are in force as of 1 - INSURED: Sal Cola Construction Co. �-+�...Any requirements or provisions in arty ANCE WITH 1,nZ Al:t�.+rt�.L �+1vHAC ITS OFFICERS, BY ENDORSEMENT TO POLICY NO. A.,lADDI IONAL INSUREDS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY' FARESPECTS T EMPLOYEES, AND HE A SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALL EXCLOSIONS, LIMITATIONS ABOVE LISTED JOB, PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. SS AGREEMENTS AS PROVIDED THE LIABILITY POLICY INCLUDES SCO�RAGEHFO�ER DZ+p�EXCLUSIONS, CONDITIONS, IN THE INSUREING AGREEMENTS, AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. the designate policy or by endorse- _ ued � This certificate extandirW coverage not afforded by is not a policy and shall not be constr of insurance be caduring the above named Policy ncelled or materially changed went thereto. Should the above mentioned contracts tice to the holder of this document. but failure to give such period. the Undersigned will endeavor to give 10 days written no kind upon the undersigned or the Insurance . notice shall impose no obligation of any R$, INC. EXP I`Ji..RA` =sr r BY. AUTHORI2ED SIGNATURE C.: =Upkfo •aNEs 0030 7 } UwaNCE CO.+ man CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE - EXPO I "JRANCE BROKERS, INC. • P.O.BOX • 235 W.MacARTHUR BOULEVARD Conntl► dAd w i Xtr ti0oa Baildinq OAKI.AN0.CALIFORNIA 94611•Teleyhcae: (415)652_'►6as . .651 Pine StreQt Martinez, CA 94553 DATE: DeceMber 30, 1.975 This is to ratify that the fdlowing policies of Insurance covering as stated INSURED: Sal Cola Construction Co. are in forceas of 2-30-75 .Any requirements or provisions in any contract or agreement between the Inwnsd and any other person, firm or CERTIFICATE NUMBER 14 corporation shill not eellarge. alter or amend tM definition of insured or - any other terms or conditions of *is Certificate or policies dit*Ated. LIMITS OF LIABILITY ell COMPANY EXPIRATION COMBINED SINGLE EACH PERSON AGGREGATE TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NO. DATE LIMIT EACH OCCURRENCE (IF APPLICABLE) OF APPLICABLE) tIF APPLICABLE) BODILY INJURY LIABILITY Mission AUTOMOBILE HAC 21996 4-1-76 100,000/3000011 OTHER w ' 300400 300,000 PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY MilSsion i AUTOMOBILE MC 21996 4-1-76 100,000 OTHER 100,000 100,000 EXCESS LIABILITY AUTOMOBILE PHYSICAL DAMAGE COMPREHENSIVE ACTUAL VALUE S DEDUCTIBLE COLLISION ACTUAL VALUE S DEDUCTIBLE WORKERS' COMPENSATION Mission STATUTORY EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY TCP 73230— 7-1-76 UNLIMITED IN CALIFORNIA OUTSIDE OF CALIFORNIA S PROPERTY COVERAGE LOCATION: PERILS: COVERAGE: SUBJECT TO ALL EXCLUSIONS. LIMITATIONS AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY APPLICABLE THERETO. ALL OPERATIONS BY OR ON BB8l1LT OF IMM INSURED AND ALL PREMISES OR PROPER?1' .USED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE NA.�3D INSURED IN CO)~0ii WTIOH WITH JOB: STORAGE ADD3210H TO EDGAR CHILDREN'S CENTER, 100 GLACIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CA., N.O.#525.31 BASE ILM ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, DRAWING, AND SPECIFICATIONS OR GENERAL CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WOMM DIRECTOR, AND IN ACCORD— ASCE WITH THE ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL. BY MDORS12ml I TO POLICY NO. RAC 21996, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ITS OFFICERS, EIID'LOYE*S,, AND AGZ1 TS ARE NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSUREDS SOLELY :.AS RESPECTS THE A,91E LISTED JOB, SUBJECT# HOWEVER, TO ALL EZCLXISIONS, LIMITATIONS AND OBER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. THE LIABILITY POLICY INCLUDES COVERAGE FOR HOLD HAMMESS AGRZE1 11 'IS AS PROVIDED IN THE INSURING AGREEMENTS, SUBJECT, HOWEVER, TO ALL EXCLUSIONS, CONDITIONS, AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE POLICY. This certificate is not a policy and shall not be construed as extending coverage not afforded by the designated policy or by endorse- went thereto. Should the above mentioned contracts of insurance be cancelled or materially clanged during the above named policy Period. the Undersigned will endeavor to give 10 days written notice to the holder of this document, but failure to give such notice sl impose no obligation of any kind upon the undersignth ed or e insurance eoelpanies. hal EXPO INSURAINtg BROKERS, INC. BY: NSV ccAUT RIZEDSIGNATURE l :NSU NSU,}1E�ANCt COVOANiES 00308 17 ., e '�I 58 rpr :r. V2 aNct CUvoaN1E5 - I 1 EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE • ZTNITED kt HOAAE OFFICE. TACOMA. WASHING-rX 1EXP0 insurance Brokers. Inc. M,cr«?:tiL•r $.2p,��,t►AY Ci rcR P.O. sox 1 1025 Bond No- U 80 62 28 0AX!-AND. CA 94611 5) 652-2605 PAYMENT BOND CALIFORNIA—PUBLIC CONTRACT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS. that _ SAL COLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY as Principal, and the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation author- ized to execute bonds in the State of California,as Surety,are held and firmly bound unto CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA as Obligee, in the sum of EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED NINETY TWO AND 50/100 Doliars(S8,492.50 for which sum we bind ourselves.our heirs,executors,administrators,successors and assigns,jointly and severally by these presents. The Condition of the above obligation is such that. Whereas the Principal on the 16TH day Of DECEMBER t9 75 .entered into a contract with the Obligee for STORAGE ADDITION TO EDGAR CHILDREN'S CENTER, 100 GLACIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA, W.O. x5255, BASE BID ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS OR GENERAL CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL. NOW. THEREFORE, if the above-bounden Principal or his subcontractors fail to pay any of the persons named in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant,the Surety will pay for the same. in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond,and also, in case suit is brought upon this bond,a reasonable attorney's fee, to be fixed by the court. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. ' Signed and sealed this 29TH day of DECEMBER 19 75 SAL C CONST N COl�'Pw UNITED PACIFIC' INSURANCE COMPANY 10. gyu. ' . . . Bill F. Robison :carr►-y:c�.Facc BDU•2304 ED.5l72ICALIF-I �%D3a q on ® CLI e J - cr \ c « 3 ] J � � lbp 9 ¢ 7 - _ a © E k = = s g 1-0 a cr - � cr £ >-ao �/ 2CD ■ , \ j® 0 > � 0 o- _ \//k :; � tn � A §_ƒ� -1. 0 k&{0 D E --- n - o a ■ . Z � j k 0 Sr \ � m tt _ Ra79 X221 / � c © _ Z :D a o � r) C 7n0 � JJEk a4g ° : • a i� 2 J / . J 2 On aE27. ` � � . ... : . . . . : � . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . � . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . � . . . . . . f : . . . . . . . @. ... . . . . . . . . .. . . UNITED PACIFIC INS E OOMPA.NY HOME OFFICE. TACOMA, WAS►11{VC�J EXPO insurance Brokers, Inc- Bond No. U 80 62 28 Ma_ARTHUR BROADWAY CENTER PERFORMANCE BOND PREMIUM: $127.00 P,O. BOX 11015 OAKLAND. CA 94611 CALIFORNIA-PUBLIC CONTRACT (415) 652-2605 KNOW ALL ,MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That SAL COLA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY as Principal,and the UNITED PACIFIC INSUILANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation author- ized to execute bonds in the State of California,as Surety,are held and fflndy bound unto CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA as.Obligee, in the sum of SIXTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE AND N0/100 * 7i: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Ioihars($ 16,985.00 for which sum we bind ourselves,our Mm executors,administratom successors and assignm jointlyand severally by these presents. THE CON-nmON of the above obligation is such that, Whereas the Principal has entered into a contract, dated DECEMBER .1 69 7 5 .with the Obligee to do and perform the following woek to-wit STORAGE ADDITION TO EDGAR CHILDREN'S CENTER, 100 GLACIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA, W.O. #5255, BASE BID ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS OR GENERAL CONDITIONS, PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCEPTED BID PROPOSAL. Now.THERE om if the said Principal shall urll and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract, then this obligation shall be void otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 29TH day of DECEMBER , 19 7 5 SAL CO 9MSTRUC ---- ANY Y (Seal) UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CUM PANY B ' y Bill F. Robison » Ateoms-at-F.et 131)11-2`01 CAL.-CONTRACT -PUBLIC- PERFORMANCE V(3 %/"►� B-2025 state of Caiifornla s5= County of Alameda December 29 . 19 75. before me• the hers'a Public in and for said County, On Bill-F. Robison known to me to be the person whose name is persanatty appeared in-Fact of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and ackmMedged subs ,bed to the within instrument as Atto.'neY to one that ,he Subscribed the name of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,as Surety,and h 1.S own name as Attotne0n-Fact, 00310 �:... �^_ ...., ... ._ - ii 1 i 1 m s� A!- '�_�-: �..:.::i r 19 ! Alotary Ic 1[1-no Or 5714-.1ty :.2y Commission �ire -' M �.,:_,,...►. 24.TCii I,1l.RCIA J.fAICHELLO gD'J•t8i6 ED.W72!CALIF-) s : ' . UN ITEI] •TVIC nTSLT� ANG'" CO�P�A.NY DOME OFFICE, TACOMA. WASHINGTON POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS.That the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.a corporation duty organized under the laws of the State of Washington,doeshereby make.constitute and appoint BILL F. ROBISON of OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA--------------------- As true and lawful Attomey+n-tact,to make execute,scat and deliver for and on its behalf,and as its as and deed ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNDERTAKINGS OF SURETYSHIP------------------ and to bind the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY ttrreby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Executivr Officer of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such officers,and hereby ratifies and confirms all that its said Attorneyislan-fact may do in pursuance hereof. This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority of Section 37A of the By-Laws of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY which provisions are now in full force and effect,reading as follows: SECTION 37A—ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT SECTION 1. The Board of Directors, the President,or any Vice-president or Assistant Vice4iresidrnt shall have power and authority to: (a)appoint Attorneys-indact and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,bonds and undertakings,reeognizances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and(b)to remove any such Attorney-in•faet at any time and revoke the power and authority given to him. SECTION 2. Attorneys-indact shall have power and authority,su8iea to the terms and limitations of the power of attorney issued to them,to execute and deltver on behalf of the Company.bonds and undertakings.recognizance%,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. The corporate seal is not necessary for the validity of any bonds and undertakings,rem9nizances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. This power of attorney is signed and scaled by facsinI under and by authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting hold on the 26th day of October,1971.at which a quorum was present,and said Resolution has not been amended or repealed: "Resokved,that the signatures of such directors and officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsirriie seat shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and boding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached.— IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice-President,and its corporate seat to be hereto affixed,this 15th daY of April t4 7S UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY SFaL '' STATE OF Washington 'a ,vt EXSCtttiVtnce?resident COUNTY OF •'�"cs• Pierce On this 15th day of April ,1975,personally appeared MORRIS E. BROWN Executive to me known to be the V.cr Pfesydent of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, and acknowledged that he executed and attested the foregonaq instrument and affixed tOw seat of said corporation thereto,and that Section 37A,Sectiorr 1 and 2 of the By-Laws of said Catgsany and the Resolution,set forth theirin,are still in full force, My Commission Expires: rt+Ey, January . is 78 ; tisapihia 1. .j Notary PubLc in and for State of f[toa ss :�••/ l p e Js Residinga, Tac o=a I D. Keith Johasoa ,Assistant Sege asy of the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and Corlett COPY of a Power of Attuner r"Cw-ed tri slid UYITED PACIFIC IkSURAPICE COMPANY,v6htrh K suit in twl force and effect. i. IN WITNESS WHEREOF.I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seat of said Company thns29th day of December 19._L5 •` As t Secrh:tary 00311 WBDU 1431 ED.W74 rs, ss••• "al ly IN 1111,1111'iliii III Its r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 In the Matter of Presentation by The Bay Area Council, Inc., on Financing Public Transit. The Board fixed this date for presentation by Mr. R. R. Brill, Project Director of The Bay Area Council Transit Finance Task Force, on the Council's summary report, "Financing Bay Area Transit - Policy Study and Recommendations"; and Mr. Brill advised that the task force was composed of individuals representing diverse interests, experience, and knowledge, and included both transit advocates and those looking at the matter from a business management viewpoint; and Pir. Brill explained that the transit finance study was prompted by the impending financial crisis faced by Bay Area public transit systems, commented on various methods of future funding, and accompanied his presentation with a series of slides; and I,1r. Brill also commented on a public opinion survey of Bay Area registered voters regarding both general and specific transit finance issues; and Supervisor E. E. Linscheid stated that the report was very comprehensive and indicates a need for future consideration as to the course public transit will follow; and Chairman :1. N. Boggess thanked i1r. Brill for his presentation. MATT.!R OF RECORD ONLY a matter of record I hereby certify that the foregoing I:a true and coned copy o#/iWUr entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supers affixed this 16th day of December . 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �1 ��i� . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 11 ti v i ,l H 24 8/75 1011 00312 124 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Legal Defense. ) December 16, 1}75 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County provide legal defense for the following individuals in the Superior Court Actions indicated, reserving all of the rights of the County in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Sections 825 and 995: NAME ASND/OR DEPARTMENT COURT AND ACTION NUS TBER Judge .Norman A. Gregg, Superior Superior Court No. 157450 Court Judge Michael S. Ross, Plaintiff 'fir. Victor Sauer, Director of Superior Court' No. 159159 Public works Cecile G. Freeding and Michael Lee Taylor, Plaintiffs Mr. J. E. Taylor, Mr. Robert W. Superior ,Court No. 15423.7 Lowe, Mr. Clifford P. Johnson, Laura 14alick, Cross-Complainant Mr. Mill-on Kubicek., Public Works (Flood Control) employees, and Contra Costa County Flood Control and Dater Conservation District Mr. H. Donald Funk, County Superior Court No. 159347 Auditor-Controller, Mfr. E. F. Pleasant Hill Redevelopment Wanaka, County Assessor, Agency, Plaintiff Thr. Arthur G. Will, County Ad- ministrator, Mr. 1W. It. Bog cess, Mir. J. P. Benny, 'fir. A. M. Dias, Mr. J. E. Moriarty, '!r. E. A. Linscheid, Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County Mr. W. N. Boggess, Mr. J. P. Kenny, Superior Court No. 159422 Mr. A. M. Dias, Mr. J. E. Moriarty, United Professional Fire Mr. E. A. Linscheid, Board of Fighters of Contra Costa Supervisors, Contra Costa County, County, I.A.F.F., Local 1230, and Mr. Arthur G. Will, County AFL-CIO, Petitioners Administrator, Mr. lie! Whatley, Chairman of the Board of Commis- sioners of Riverview rare Pro- tection District , Mr. Joe Barraco, Mr. Frans Arata, '7r. Christoplhe_r Enes, Mr. Louis 3arcfa, Mr. E.E.1mer Glasser, 'i„. marry Stitt, lerbers of the Board of Co^missioners of Riverview Fire Protector. District , `,r. Fred Golinveaux, ?ire Chien' of Riverview Fire Protection District PASSED b,. the Board on December 10', 1975. 00313 L I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hanO and rhP SPAT Luus� uarcza, !.sr. rimer Glasser, ;L•^. Harry Stitt, lembers of the Board of Commissioners of Riverview „'ire Protection District, *Ir. Fred Golinveaux, Fire Chief of Riverview Fare Protection District PASSED by the Board on December 163% 19T5 00313 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. • Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 16th day of December, 1975. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK By , Deputy, Clerk Bonnie Boaz cc Board Members Judge N. A. Gregg Mr. V. Sauer Public Forks (Flood Controls Mr. J. E. Taylor Mr. R. W. Lowe Mr. C. P. Johnson Mr. M. Kubicek Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Mr. H. D. Funk Mr. E. F Wanaka vl Mr. A. G. Will Riverview Fire Protection District Chief F. Golinveaux Mr. M. Whatley Mr. J. Barraco Mr. F. Arata Mr. C. Enes Mr. L. Garcia Mr. E. Glasser Mr. H. Stitt County Counsel - F 00314 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 1975 In the Matter of Continued Hearing on Proposed Abandonment of Del Porto Road, Oakley Area This being the time set for continued hearing on the proposed abandonment of Del Porto Road, Oakley area; and The Board having been advised that the Planning Cam-mission continued its hearing on the aforesaid abandonment for an indefinite period; Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that December 14, 1976 at 10:30 a.n. as a time for hearing the proposed Del Porto Road abandonnent. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Recorder Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Planning Commission Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 16th uay of December 0119 75 Director of Planninq J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Pacific Gas & Electric Co.. " Pacific Telephone Company YL._ �,- • %I ` IL r Deputy Clerk E.B.M.U.D. Jeanne O. Isaglio, ;A1 .T. & S.F. Railway Co. California Public Utilities Commission Has ans IOU 00315 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Acceptance of Grant Deeds. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Grant Deeds are ACCEPTED: Date Grantor Reference November 20, 1975 Sylvia M. Langford MS 99-75 December 8, 1975 Clarence A.A. Harris, San Ramon Valley et al Boulevard PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Yorks Director Supervisors offixed this 16th day of December, 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk N. In aham H24 W5 IOU 00316 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 14 75 j" IRS ~ In the Matter of Deferred Improvement Agreement, Development Permit 3034-75, Danville Area. a IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with James W. Lessner and Janet J. Lessner permitting deferment of construction of permanent improvements required by the Board of Zoning Adjustment as a U condition of approval of Development Permit 3034-?5, Danville area; N and ti IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Board accepts from James W. Lessner and Janet J. Lessner a Grant Deed dated December 5, 1 1975 (for additional right of way along Hartz Avenue). PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. ti vv;1 t I hereby certify that the foregoing Is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. James W. Lessner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of S 745 Tunbridge Road Danville, California affixed thi$ 16th day of December , 19 Z5_ 94526 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Recorder (via P.W. ) ey Deputy Clerk Public Works Director Director of Planning N. In sham H 24 8/75 lOM OCI-317 Vic..urded at the request of: CO:�TM COSTA COUNTY ' ReouZed at the Regn2d of CC4M COSTA COt W Return tx PROG. PM &SPM FROI PUBLIC t ORM DEPT. FECO,RM SECTION Tnis box for exclusive use oA. Recorder. Road Railroad Hart Co. Rd.No. DEFERRED IMPROVEME.:T AGRE04E,ti'T 1$%? tio• Permit 3034 75 z Assessgrs ho 208-024- 2 & PtrP j uervisoriat V ect: Permit 3034-75 ) l Distri 1. PARTIES. Effective on the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to as "County" and .TARES W. LESSINER and JANET J. LES R,- hereinafter referred to as 110%%mer" mutually agree and promise as follo::s: 2. PURPOSE. Owner desires to develop the property he owns as described in Exhibit "rill attached hereto and wishes to defer construction of permanent improvements, and County agrees to such deferment if Ou-ner constructs improvements as herein promised. 3. AGI;E 11W? BINMIXG ON SUCCESSMS I, I?TEREST. This agrewent is an irstrzment affecting the titre or possession of t .a real pruuerty described in Exhibit `:A"_ All the terns, covenants and conditions herein imposed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of Owner. Upon the sale or division of the property described in Exhibit "A" the terms of this agreer-e.t shall apply separately to each parcel, and the oumer of each parcel shall succeed to the obligations imposed on (timer by this agreement. Upon annexation to any City, Cumer shall fulfill all tha teras of this agrac- ment upon denand by such city as though N-ner had contracted with such. city orioinal?y. Any arnexin—city shall have all the rights of a third party beneficiary. STREET AIS DRAINAGE I?!PrOV'E,S-.\TS. A. The improvements set torth in this section may be deferred by Gwaier and shall be constructed when required in the manner set forth in this aereement. 71ie deferred improvements required by County Department of Public Works are generally described on• Exhibit "B" attached hereta. B. tfhen the County Public horks Director determines that there is no fu.cher reason to defer construction of the improvements, he shall notify Owner in writing to commence their installation and construction. The notice shall be milled to the current owner or o:c;icrs of the land as shown on the latest adopted Count} Assessment roll. The notice shall describe the work: to be done by ou-ners, the time within vishich the cork: shall conmence and the tine within which the wort: shall be cowYleted. All or any portion of said iz:)ro. ments -ay be re;uired at a s_ec:_ied time. Each o::•ner shall participate on a pro rata basis ir, the cost o; the improvements to be installed. If CZ-ner is obligated to pay a pro rata share of a cost of a facility pro,ided by others, the notice shall include the amount to be paid and :.he tire when paynent rust be mde. �is S. PERFORMANCE OF 'M-- tin,K. Mcncr _;tall perfe n the work and ,Ue thy, paynarts required by County as set forth }:arcin or as modified by the Saari of Supervisors. 0"Mer snail cause pians and specifications for the improvements to be prepared by compatcnt persons r legally alllal1_icd to do the work and to submit said inprovenent plans and specifications for approval prior to ce=encement of tae work. described in the notice and to bay County irsrec- r -1- Mcrofhned with Koerd oric tion fees. The work shall be done in accord.:ace with County standards .in effect at the time improvement plans arc submitted for app:_oval. O:m er agrees to commence and complete v the work' within the time specified in the notice given by the Director of Public ldorks and to notify the County at least 48 hours prior to start of work. In the event Owner fails to construct any improvements required under this agreement, County may, at its option, do the work and collect all the costs from Owner. If County sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Owner shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. Permission to enter onto the property of Owner is granted to County or its contractor as may be necessary to construct such improvements. b. JOINT COOPERATIVE PLAN. Owner agrees to cooperate upon notice by County with other property owners, the County, and other public agencies to provide the improve- ments set forth herein under a joint cooperative plan including the formation of a local improvement district, if this method is feasible to secure the installation and construction -of the improvements. 7. REVIEW OF REQ:JIREMEWS. If Owner disagrees with the requirements set forth in any notice to commence installation of improvaWents he shall, within 30 days of the • date the notice was mailed, request a review of the requirements by the Board of Supervisors of County. The decision of this Board shall be binding upon both County and Owner. S. ACCEPTANCE OF I:+L'ROX10-EXTS. County agrees to accept these improvements specified in 62dibit "B" which are censtrscted and completed in accordance with County standards and requirements and az: installed within rights of gray or easements dedicated and accepted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors. owner agrees to provide any necessary temporary drainage facilities, access road or other required improvements, to assume responsibility for the proper functioning thereof, to submit plans to the appropriate County agency for reviev., if required, and to maintain said improvements and facilities in a manner which will preclude any hazard to life or health or damage to adjoining property. 9. BONDS. Prior to approval of improvement plans by the County, Owner may be required to execute and deliver to the County a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond in an amount and form acceptable to County to be released by the Board of Supervisors in whole or iL part upon corplet:on of the work required and payment of all persons furnishing labor and materials in the performance of the work. 10. INSURANCE• Owner shall maintain, or shall require any contractor engaged to perform the work to maintain, at all times during the performance of the w-ork called for herein, a separate policy of insurance in a form and amount acceptable to County. 11. INDF-1,1tITY. The Owner shall assume the defense and inden-mify and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees, from every expense, liability or payment by reason of injury (including death) to persons or damage to property suffered through any act or omission, including passive negligence or act of negligence, or both, of the Developer, his employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or anyone direct:;: or indirectly employed by either of them, or arising in any way *ron the work called for by this agreement, on any part of the =revises, including those matters arising out of the deferment of permanent drainage facilities or the adequacy, safety, use or nonuse of temporary drainage facilities, the perfor-..lance or nonperformance of the 'work. ':ais provision shall not be deemed to require the Owner to indemnify the County against the -2- 00319 iJ liability for &-mage arising from the sole aealigence or 21£ul misconduct of the County or its agents, servants, or independent contractcrs who are directly responsible to the County. COUN Y OF CO\M COSTA Oil-ER VICTOR W./SAUER, Public Vo*rks Director x J s W. Lessner By �/ 'fi ernon c, .et J. a Wer Chief Deputy Public Works Director RECO:ME:�DED FOR APPROVAL: By - ,(.--- Assistant Pubic Ifork SvInrector NOTE: This document is to be acknowledged wit1h signatures as they appear on deed of title. FORM APPROVED: JOM B. CLAUSE\, County Counsel $ n Iv, Dep-uty STATE OF CAUFORINIA♦ Ow tlii. •-i t�'i of -S+.h'Y'.-"er.✓.::e- - . .ke 3vw cwt tkoxrawd wnce!mdred-- befo►e nit, sti /—,�,ri/. J','� . .r -------,c,Votcry Public. Strom of Ccliforwio,dwlY coaemirsia,ud and sawrrn,persanclty appearr! ' ' ' ' to Me to be tk:,ers.:a .:case ttccme U6Icr:oed to the..nthix iwtrumew iO •iCIAL SEAL I .:nd at:xoc:-dged to sc:L°:t =I I c:....►•r� Itiuc_O�`.:t7. EIL'%ilS��.y << 11•:f•IT�'FSS WHEREOF tsrrrd t'u a Sat �,`. _ii.f.Y t'�cLIC1��•�h3RS�i,A ;s r OF I A=lieremdo�seet my hcnd and a,Ts d my ojic:at , :' ri.:,c•;,:C;;..,,- :tC.s .•s+tp-;. iwrhe`~�'�"ry'r�•;` af =r ,-' �� l�y�tta a;.-ai*�!:�s+,;:•13 137E ; eeniric=e f-stebornawria die !ay and yecr in tJcts / A- i' '' Notary Public State of California Co.n!ez�•s Form do 32�1elaowlednt--Cenenl. e= ` (C Jee 123si) a--aiaa tMtNTi3..►sa! lir Commission Espires •• -",i'' 3' l 320 EXHIBIT A • 2OS-024-02 & Ptn. Qg 208-024-02; Peru 3034-75 CALIFOR►r'I`►• ss �undrtd 'f i,tic f'� '- STATE OF Publu. Notary COQ Of !/ 'f�•�/�i �. isi -"'---"' .-► �fo.c�. , +l?/-'•A,�'r �! �anr,A�sa�IY�PP� On Strte of Cdifa�+°► *I.V Cr'r ,o� ,c •ski/ J J ed to tilt:ritkuc itrstrutnext M�j sswscrw :ao�a to n:r to be�► elated t rt Saxe. and aTsed my of eW sm' ;.ad arm to•+:K It do Set se�r+jY and r ticis Or i%:It:�■■i.� L !� I1.':VITITESS 1V �, � <7/ /:` � ce 3► 1C. j.?= thetufa F+..c+. ,,..��s.,.�•�" Is01 141 i!e,�• OtaryPub c.s of Califo ���`�y Form N-37 arca EXHIBIT A 20S-024-02 & Ptn. 08 Pernit 3034-75 208-024-02: - Lot 3, and the east 11 feet, front and rear measurements, of Lot 4, Block. 4, zap of Danville, filed August 12, 1891, Map Book C, page 47 1/2, Contra CostaCounty records. 208-024-Portion of 08: The east 19 feet, front and rear measurements of Lot 9, and all of Lot 10, Block 4, map of Danville, filed August 12, 1891, Map Book C, page 47 1/2, Contra Costa County records. 4. t 00321 w EMBIT B Permit 3034-75 I. Improvements required by Contra Costa County Public Works Department along the frontage of Parcel 208-024-02 and portion 08 as described in Exhibit A. 1. Approximately 61 lineal feet of curb and gutter along Hartz Avenue. 2. Approximately 70 lineal feet of carb and gutter along Railroad Avenue. 3. Approximately 61 lineal feet of 4-foot 6-inch sidewalk, width measured from the curb face along Hartz Avenue. 4. Approximately 70 lineal feet of 4-foot 6-inch side%aik, width measured from the curb face along Railroad Avenue_ S. ,approximately 670 square feet of street paving to pave between the existing pavement and the curb along Hartz Avenue. 6. Approximately 770 square feet of street paving to pave between the existing pavement and the curb along Railroad Avenue. 7. Necessary longitudinal drainage. The developer shall install and bulkhead that portion of Line C-1, 18-inch reinforced concrete pipe, along the nest side of Railroad Avenue fronting the subject property. 8. Temporary conforms for paving and drainage as may be necessary at the time of construction. 9. Street lighting as required along the frontage. 10. Utility distribution services shall be installed underground. II. Relocation of Utilities Any necessary relocation of utility facilities shall be the responsibility of the owner or his agent. III. County's Responsibility County furnished engineering will consist of preliminary design and establishment of street grades and drainage and one staking of curb line grade. Any replacement of curb stakes will be at the expense of the owner. The construction of the above deferred iaprevements shall begin as outlined in Item 4B of the Agreement when any of the following occur: 1. Hartz Avenue is constructed to its ultimate planned width by the County or by an Assessment District, that portion of improvements along Fartz :avenue will be improved. 2. R;iilroad Avenue is constructed to its ultimate planned width by the County or by an ,assessment District, that portion of improvements along Railroad Avenue will be improved, S. Frontage improvements are constructed adjacent to the subject property_ 00322 w .M_ -------------- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 2 In the Matter of Deferred Improvement Agreement, Land Use Permit 32 .-72, San Ramon Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Gloria Dodd, D.V.K., permitting deferment of construction of permanent improvements required by the Planning Commission as a condition of approval r of Land Use Permit 324-72, San Ramon area. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975- I hereby certify that the foregahM is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the slate oforesoid. cc: Gloria Dodd, D.V.K. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of rdSupervisors 2355 arRemon Valley affixed this 16th day of December . 19 _75 San Ramon, California 94.583J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Recorder (via P.W. ) By -k �__� , Deputy Clerk Public Works Director N. Ingr am Director of Planning H24 8/75 10M 00 3/3 '..,rdc0 at the request oaf: ONi R.1% COSTA CCU."IT I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Gloria Dodd, D.V.H. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 2355 San Ramon Valley S"per"SOn Boulevard affixed this 16th day of December . 19 31 San Ramon, California 94583 J. R. Ol.SSON, Clerk Recorder (via P.W. ) By yf, � �: , Deputy Clerk Public Works Director H. Director of Planning Zngram H 24 8/75 10M 001323 323 1 .,rdccl at tine request Of: :QNiR A COSTA 0,0101 l' .Li Tliis box for exclusive use of Recorder. DEFERRED I.kT.ROVF_%1E1T AGREF_':.rENT {Projec LUP 324-73 1, PARTIES. Effez.tive on the County of Contra Costa., hereinafter referred to as "County" ar i" id l.ald, D.V.M.' hereinafter referred to as 110mier" rutually agree and promise; as follows: ?. PURPOSE. Owner desires to develop the property he ohms as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and wishes to defer construction of permanent improver::encs, and County agggees to such deferment if Oamer constructs ir.. rovenents as herein pronised. 3. AGREMEA'?' BINMING 0\ SLICCESSi;S 7 INT-REST. This agreement is an instr ncr t affecting the title or possession of the real rroparty describe-d in Exhibit "A". All the ter,:,s, covenants and conditions herein h-Dosed shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors in interest of 0:,-ler. tl:i4n the sate or division, of the property described in Exhibit "A" the tears of this a,rccrcnt spall a^pl sevarately to each Yarcr:1, and the oimer of each parcel shall succecd to the oblilaations inposed on C"��±er by this agreement. Upon annexation to any City, Caner shall fulfill ::il the te:-rs of this agree- ment upon demand by such city as though C-honer h3v contracted with such cit} orilgirall;�. Any annexing-city shall have all the rights of a third party beneficiary. 4. STREET AND D?LZI NAIM A. The improvements set forth in this section ray be deferred by Owncr and shall be constructed when renuir-':J in rhe man n;:r set forth in this a crE.en,:bYtt. Tlie deferred irDrover eats reJ•v i red by County Department of Public :or?.s are gcnpr al ly described oIa.Exidb it L "':'" att_:ch:.'. here:'.. B. When the County Public hocks L'":rector deter-nines that there is no further reason to defer construczion of the im rovewents, lie shall notify Owner in writing to co=cnce their installation and c:onstnuction. Ilhe notice shall be mailed to the current owner or o:aaers of thit� land as shaacn on the latest adoptcJ Couaty ilssessraent roll. Mite notice shall describe the nark to be done by owners, the :is:,: within mild: the work shall color.-z ince and the time wi win which the %ork shall be Completes:. rill or :a Tay portion of said i ,,provements ;pati• lie reqa:ired at a sue:.ified ti=c. Each. o�mer shall participate on a pro rata basis in the cost of the ivpro,•e.:•en4s to It.- installcd. 1: Cwn.er is obligated to lay a pro rata share of a cost of a facility provided b.- others, the notice shall include the amount to be paid and the tire when pa}•taent =.st be m-dc. 5. P1'11FO1'_'AV r_F OF Ti!!: F-D"'K. Neer shall nerforn th,2 +.*ork and rale the pa;-..,ents required by CDmity ;as set forth herein or as by z':7- Eoard of Supervisors. Owner shall cause plans and specifications for ti:c it:prote-s+e:::s to be prepared by competent person: legally qualified to do the work and to submit s:ald innro - nent plans are, specifications for approval prior to cormencenent of the Bork described iii the :notice and to pay County inspec- O 24 Mcrofilrned with board order •tion fees. 7nic work shall be Zonae in accord. ace with County standards in effect at the time improvement plans arca submi teed for apri oral. Ot ner agrees to com—once and complete the work within the time specified Jr the notice given by the Director of Public 'Norks and to notify the County at least 48 hoars prior to start of work. In the event Omor fails to construct any improvements required under this agreement, County may, at its option, do the work and collect all the costs from Owner. If County sues to compel performance of this agreement or recover the cost of completing the improvements, Otmer shall pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. Permission to enter onto the property of (X-ner is granted to County or its contractor as may be necessary to construct such improvements. 5. JOIh7 COOPERATIVE PL-A.M. O::ner agrees to cooperate upon notice by County Ltiith other property ourners, the County, and other public agencies to provide the improve- ments set forth herein under a joint cooperative t,,Ian including the formation of a local improvement district, if this method is feasible to secure the installation: and construction -tf the IID;I�r.,wmn�_f� 7. REVIEW OF REQUiREM-EXT'S. If Owner disagrees cath the requirements set forth in any notice to commence installation of improvements he shall, within 30 ddys of the date the notice was mailed, request a review of the requirements by the Board of Supervisors of County. The decision of this Board shall be binding upon both County and Owner. S. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROt'E'•'.E.ZTS. County agrees to accept those improvements spocificd in Exhibit "S" which are constructed and cc—plated in accordance with County standards and requirements and are installed within rights of way or easements dedicated and accepted by resolution of :he Board of Supervisors. G ever agrees to provide any necessary tcm,,)o:nry drainage facilities, access road or other required impro emeuts, to assuuc responsiuility for the proper functioning thereof, to submit plans to the appropriate Count} agency for review, if required, and to maintain said improvements and facilities in a manner which will preclude any hazard to life or health or damage to adjoining property. 9. BONDS. Prior to approval of improvement plans by the County, Otrner may be required to execute and deliver to the County a faithful performance bond and a labor and materials bond in an amount and form acceptable to County to be released by the Board of Superlisors in whole o: is part upo...n ccepletion of the work required and payment of all persons furnishing, labor and materials in the performance of the York. 10. MbUtcdVU. flamer shaii mailttain, or pita l l ia-z c:gaged to perforin the work to maintain, at all times durin4 the performance of the work called for herein, a separate policy of insurance in a forst and amount acceptable to County. 21. INDEM.1'I'M The Omer shall assume the defense and indemnify and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees, fro= every expense, liability or payment by reason of injury Cincludina death) to persons or darsage to property suffered through any act or omission, including passive negligence or act of negligence, or both, of the Developer, his employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by either o them, or arising in a.-.v t:ay from the work called for by this agreement. on any part of the premises, including those ratters arising out of the deferment of permanent drainage facilities or the adequacy, safety, use or nonuse of temporary drainage facilities, the perrorWance or nonperformance of the work. 'Phis provision shall not be deeed to require the Owner to indemify the County against the -2- 0032 Iw .liability for damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Gouty or its agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the County. COUNTY OF CO-NTRA COSTA ONMER VICTOR W SAUER, Public ��forks Director ,.f���►�,�c,,.- �'• � �f By t non L. Cline, �. Chief Deputy Public Works Director RECO:01ENDED FOR APPROVAL: , By Assistant Pub rks erector NOTE: This document is to be acknowledged with signatures as they appear on deed of title. FORA! APPROrED: JOHN B. CLAUS£N, County Counsel By Deputy" STATE OF CAU RNtA COUNTY OF FIZZ*2 S$ , '-„ .............._................ _.... 1976—,before me the undetsitined,a Notary Publie in and for said County and State,personalty appeared ........................... v1%81&""11U ttttUUUnittt UU40 __. ............................__-------------------................_ ............._..v.......................................... OMMIL SEAL E ' DYANE M.$AER jof,n to mt- to be theperson—. Sshost>ttsme *.�Z:....__. .... sulweribed to the within a k0'TAXT PUXL1c.CAt.IPMX1A 1n x Coumrr or commA cos, r,a u..r.t rw.w�u tar �&;,trument,ani acknowledged to r:-A-that.C.he. .executed the same. t`ts:c:t:i.:z::r::taa::rr.-sssz_-:tx�att•,x::� r 'Notary's Suture.' i� .li.�- .,. .f.r�,!:.'...1,._! � .l�L.r............ ............ GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT Form No.16 00326 F i EXHIBIT A (L'JP 324-72) All those parcels of land described in the deed to Everett E. Dodd, et ux., recorded December 27, 1972 in Book 6829 of Official Recordsat page 262, records of Contra Costa County, California. Excepting therefrom, that parcel of land described in the deed to Contra Costa County. recorded February 21, 1974 in Boob: 7161 of Official Records at page 596, Record of said County. O0l)2'7 • r E(HISIT B LUP'324-7z 1. Improv-ements required by Contra Costa County Public tfork . Department along the frontage of Parcel 205-290-08 and 09 as described in Exhibit A. 1. Approximately 100 lineal feet of curb and gutter along frontage of San Ramon Valley Boulevard. 2. Approximately 50 lineal feet of curb and gutter along frontage of Thorup Lane. S. Approximately 100 lineal feet of ten-foot (101) sidewalk, width measured from the curb face, along frontage of San Ramon Valley Boulevard. 4. .Approximately 50 lineal feet of four and one-half (4t2) feet sidewalk, width measured from face of curb, along Thorup Lane. S. Approximately 2,000 square feet of street paving to pave between the existing pavement and the curb, on San Ramon Valley Boulevard.. b. Approximately 1,000 square feet of street paving to pave between centerline and curb, Thorup Lane. ?, necessary longitudinal drainage. S. Temporary conforms for paving and drainage as may be necessary at the time of construction. 9. Street lighting as required along the frontage. 10. Utility distribution services shall be installed underground. II. Relocation of Utilities Any necessary relocation of utility facilities shall. be the responsi- bility of the owner or his agent. III. County's Responsibility County-furnished engineering will consist of preliminary design and establishment of street grades and drainage and one staking of curb line grade. Any replacement of curb stakes will be at the expense of the owner. The construction of the above deferred improvements shall begin as out- lined in Item 4B of the Agreement when any of the following occur: 1. San Ramon Valley Boulevard or Thorup- Lane is constructed to its ultimate planned width by the County or by an Assessment District. 2. Frontage improvements are constructed adjacent to the subject property. ©Q,328 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 1g 75 in the Matter of Approving Relocation of Drainage Facilities at West End of Silverwood Court. Orinda Area, and Authorizing Issuance of Purchase Order. (Work Order 4751) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the relocation of drainage facilities at the west end of Silverwood Court, Orinda area, is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to arrange for the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $4,875.00 to the Richmond Crane Service for installation of 200 feet of 15-inch corrugated metal pipe, one Type 'C' junction box, anchor pipes and grading as necessary to restore drainage that was destroyed by a slide, the pipe to be routed to bypass the unstable area; The Board concurring with the County Planning Department that this project is categorically exempt from the provisions of the Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as a Class I, County Environ- mental Impact Report Guidelines project, the Director of Planning is instructed to prepare and file with the County Clerk a notice of determination concerning the approval of this project. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregahM is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public Works Director Wi't's my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Summon Purchasing affixed this 16th day of December 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By _ Deputy Clerk N. Ing9aham 0032.9 H 24 8/75 IOM IN THE LARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUIiU TY, STATE OF CALIFORFFIA AS EX OFFICIO TM BOARD OF 3UPR$YIWR3 OF TRE CON'T'RA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT I hereby Certify that the foregoing daate aforesaid.a true and correct Copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors W.cness, my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director Supervisors County Auditor—Controller afSxed this 16th day of December , 1975 Purchasing J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Y N. In aham H 24 B/75 IOM Ih THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT In the batter of Approving, ) December 16 , �9 75 and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition(s) . j IT IS BI THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement(s) and Right of Way Contract(s) are APPROVED and the Public %orks Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract Payee and Refererice Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount Lines E and E-1 Clifton B. December 2, Title Insurance $2,265 Brentwood area Cooper, et ux 1975 and Trust Work Order 8514 Company Escrow No. CD-236668 The County Auditor-Cortroller is AUTHORIZED to drawv.arrant(s) in the amount(s) specified to be delivered to the County Supervising Real Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed(s) from above-named grantor(s) for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was passed December 16, 1975 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of ltt Board ofSurer ors affixed lis day of , 19 cc: Public :,forks Director County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSONx CLERK County Administrator By Deputy N. , er ro.•an 20.J� 00330 75-10-2(!0 r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COWTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Natter of Approving ) — December 16 , 19Z5L and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition(s) . ) ) IT IS BY THE BOARD 'ORDERED that the following settlement(s) and Right of Stay Contract-(s) are APPROVED and the Public 11orks Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract on behalf of the County: Contract PayeesxzA Reference Grantor Date Amount DIABLO ROAD James Brennan, December 8, James Brennan, $447 Danville area et al 1975 John C. Forsyth, (Project No. 4721-4159-74) and Betty Forsyth The County Auditor—Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw ti:arrant(s) in the amount(s) specified to be delivered to the County Supervising Real Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed(s) from above—named grantor(s) for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was passed _December 16. 1975 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 16th day of December , 1975 . cc: Public Works Director County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, CLERK County Administrator By N. TngrAbSIMS Deputy Clerk Form #20.14. 00331 7;-1.0-200 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 19 _Z5 1n the Matter of Refund of Deposit, Subdivision 11446, Brentwood Area. The Board on December 3, 1974. havin accepted as complete construction of improvements in Subdivision 1116, Brentwood area; and The Public Works Director having this day recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1 . Declare that the street and drainage improvements have successfully completed the one-gear satisfactory performance period and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected; 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Mr. Charles Pringle, P. 0. Box 305, Brentwood, California 911.513, the $720 deposited as surety under the Subdivision Agreement (Auditor's Deposit Permit Number 121308 dated November 8, 1974 for $370 and Auditorts Deposit Permit Number 1024.86 dated Septemoer 28, 1972 for $1 ,500, a total of $1 ,870 of which $1 ,150 was refunded by Board Order dated June 10, 1975); IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Public Works Director are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Charles Pringle Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 16th d of December . 19 75 : County Auditor-Controller °y County Administrator l J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk 0 , qQ9r 3 H 24 8/75 lOM 3 I H 24 8175 loM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 192-5 In the Matter of Granting Permission to Partially Close Sobrante Avenue, 91 sobrante Area. The Public Works Director having reported that the East Bay Municipal Utility District requested permission for a partial road closure of Sobrante Avenue (County Road No. 1272) between its two intersections with Circle Drive during the period December 8, 1975 through December 12, 1975 between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. for the purpose of installing a water line; and The Public Works Director having further reported that prior approval Was granted in accordance with Item 3 of the Board Policy on Road Closures with the following conditions: 1 . All signing is to be in accordance with the state of California Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices, dated 1971 , and the County Manual of Yarning Signs, Lights and Devices; and 2. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the action taken by the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ccs Public Yorks Director Supervisors affixed this 16th day of December 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk N. In am a0?33 F124 8175 lou In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Consulting Services Agreements for Foundation Investigations Proj. No. 3971-4301-769 Clayton Area; Prof. No. 1065-4526-7% Richmond Area. _. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Peter Kaldveer and Asso— ciates to provide for foundation investigations of Marsh Creek Road Bridge, Clayton area (33 2CO), and Park Avenue Bridge on Wildcat Creek, Richma nd area t32,7C0), said amounts not to be exceeded without prior approval of the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the fon p*v Is a true and coffee copy of as order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Contractor supervisors Public 'Uorks Director affixed this -Ti,t �y of �o{�nrn}tiar , 19�� County Auditor—Cortr o?ler , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By: o4/Deputy Clerk Rondalf Shackles ©0334 H 24 8/75 10M ` t' •l. ..):' •�.• `'�Ij)U..L 1�)�): • .)w.1«+ .)l: ,r.. 1 L.�.�l..t.��rJ .. .�:''w .LIcoroo—i-t--c. Vv.r3 M t�'1'01 i C is. (a) Vul.)I is COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA { (b) Conru14 ant':; ,::d.::^. • L !1cici:cnz: Peter Kaldveer.• C Associates i Portobello Office Center, Eleven Embarcadero Nest, Oakland, CA 94607_ n IP 1 7" .v . _ , ,� >: ..Y�. 'f' ,%-k1&*$%4.!. U ".ia: ''4• E t:�:.x -♦fir.-•; • ,r«� �t _ ,��•- 1. r• " 1Qi1 �� �C.«x * c• ,OiialL -6s ..�'' iTCo"l)@sa.t.��' ..« Tl.• S �! .�j/;max. %Collui R t;:,�C 'ars . K-. - .. j t�~4 • is tut dC ; {;i� i tillV l.0 ,1i 4'21'�•r;�;, �. Mf CVSTA '£" 0 qTY OF 5 F a{ i� µConsu3LL'� �, .ts*.' 4 1►ctd.e�•: Peter:Kaidveec,: s;assoc�ates= 11 r ; w._. . Portobello n0iFf,rce.Center;"{ - eveir' Emtiarcadero:hNesc, '�Oaklanif= .,CAy:.'34607 �, _ T t G ., ... ...._ a: 0ecember l6 1,975 '" , {.c) L`ffe,,14, Uatc.,a {sia ' I'ro�"ouL 'lt�a, + ::s: : e�, 'J 'laoc L o Park Aiiii i�ive Brrd e g{1065= 526 � } .i'i'i -Ir —111:� t:�-.i.^- S2.70O Park'Ave Sr�dger5S3 2O0 Mai I fi�C ad d:, Treege � 11 reek Ro Budde _: _ ,, 2: ■iy_?►� t.�.1.2'.tt�.' The se, S�Luna`virez a tu1.esi: T.i1F* �r�l�'t'ECS`= c''1�ta4V4iki. �+-* v�� fl V• J• .nx1111' h fi` '/5`°y _1 - r /! " i�CSI��'mlua ':''. ofr.'�c?.a? Ca-'ac%ty ¢ bu'a P2C'S a�,-."T%�'� I a I `)' s r a r � � i r ��11— 1 ,;� ' • : iw * t tars 4 • .� :f4. F �,: ,� { s r - ,.. a }11 t:ah1 —1 CO.aL1 �Coull.. s-L1 i Ci' I•LUt`i�2Saxt G�. �� �� �� il r. r IC �rson� i x1�.n , a.�ove for Gos:,�ull;a�iI 11 1:n0:':2 m�—Uh:ccio�e��� �' �x a.a u��.' ; "i' a to ":bu;:�:nc s ca c.:b cs,x pe ascnal y a rpesa�z.t�bc cre� '. ��I111,� 1. � �r; 11 1.ou�y an �.c.:ato::lzr;;;c1 ;Lha ; ue 5ir, a< artcl`hn i+:s r cazos? 4� af17-n I oz p z;i.cr� .;� rscraeci abovc...e.ec . ed ..hc ,r•, t .t j.11l istrument"i �sW'in . bo ,Its =� or - re o3s:L_oz o ��s Boar m r o�c ' s 11tf• 1. _7-7i 3 2 �� = ..G WT �qQjLjxww, � • Rt: r ,:" Q 1 WTAXXA ".ALAMiy,xM•�x•3�� �9C i � Ysialic M. - rseacx�tstr � , 9 _ I i 4uuuui y uwus!4yTmu! ♦ ;t, _ r 1. . ..- 5 F9 3i.4f ?for J Sauer Jot $. Cola�c:serzt, Gourty °Gcsxrnc- B, �' • �� :'uiillr' orit:: moire ae {" ' ' 13y- 11s :r* • 11i, ;"3 ty a . ;j� �tk'♦Lt� l iE""i , , +'�SELc.y Ax F a rk 3. t�ar4lc ~rte f1.ectxve o.ni-i j me above dale, t e,abi11.11ove naqd� pr�alf'c. z1� , 'c; s° iiii�.1 Ga2lJcltiantI I- , M•Zi,V,•.Mi++�w .'.: �''2�LC asic p c:. .. ... as fol.la :. $ , '.` 4�Fz r �i. L" �_ic��r.;,cstZ. P. bllc A&nc�. ;erei f er a : Gas Multant , a ikc , Ca �s �� M k s SCCi:q�>+a S11C11. £ate.Dio n I 1;0':a"', '.1�0x'i», .'.i: DX"'o :: QXl lfl eX'VC;.Ce3 C24Se :"�"i7i£itff" 1'it'1`C].ri� L*�3r�n tip^. �'.erm i ,and :!:! COLt; t t." ':1 '.: Ct of t �".�2t�r ay tCkt ; ". C v-• Y' tea ' 'r i 1. ,,.r '"f .� d g vLiy; �. Scaua� :of iu-af -3.c0 "a"co�e of� SCT!l�cG 5.sc1. " bei a; dewc*�lbec� �.�k�operc.� t��,' at,ta •hi!d �.ru.Lai. r a s F $5 a / s 5y y "cam 1 x{/ f r t a t, i *" s .�' e -y inn : ,r•d t`{ Z r'z.: ¢ 'rr 7} r 'A,s., s� i P dT. , r,, . G, Inpura^'.13C '.'. "t`liL, �"Oilsii��.'s'ltt7i": '''$I , 4 i1Q�'d—l",en � ` 't►ftp ,tTt? a}i� ► :'G j F .. , ,.�..: q 3 a -^'°". "'�., g.=�„w "-, -r.,u4aK s, ',. *�"',:. az.�"°t3,i s^�'T w1 y¢- ' yj,rk" f �£uri._a13 ccrwlfical.es or oLis�� ,e. .t enc+ ;"ac..eli 7,�Oggd� 2 - Aber c ,c � }Y y Z, �u ♦4 cxA 't„Xk.,' '0.'i z `x' d ..fs r JF "" v _} ;;. �,w o �uul�c.: iJ. z11L iilss3rrilcaIii, o X a Y �.t a25ias,0®G�z oar :� 4a►�^ :R re �S� ,*, of. bnui3u n�ur3.e:x or c3 a1:� to az*y ane aye ara can ,, a1:' ile- -A5.04, tl0,09fb ,4:�0 •• „ .. a { t t r' f A . t .: St 3 *'r t ..x,,, ,..;i,I` .1Me f�"S A r%F Y or nor p^risos:c ins ,once �.ccili Zi.�`or4111�,�acc.L.� Yong, �..^ccs ,,Ii- ,o,,, p�c,x�:� i.::?.. �[�; *� lltils3 , LYI:aL:�•'.7iRGt: p�'aYat•'..itr; "t32` a 3.f".•. . of rsa4- 'Z4A'av �. tc�'.YZ t�F 'at:L"cr ,, ,-Y:jw, i-I 14 �,:. b ;f z- 3r.{° a '� r v�tt ,..1" E - ,zr $ -P, `k{ p't.s+t ����{,r,` j o: clays' t1UL'�ce ok. policy lapse ori o4ho ZlawZo:� l.�z s�..uciyrzrs , Y k �^ �, .,? '£.�$f h+?i' I""" h Yr iFJ'* f W.y7{'�T , r `.'7 z�r'J ,��"` t2kk+t s t �, P't"it+3 iAz. 4J c �mencv, St31� �' G0Tsa i . t1 `fob ps a G s`:CT!ir llC"L iC *S perfo�Nxad "A Li c ,miiis ar:o:4t. 1st �1P�e c11:'Bf att;'A6:o, f --m a,-tj 1 c :•r �:c: �xx, r all o•erx.�: c. a3 � �nczdcxs�al eae� e fob Kbcn rio ac.cr �iunwl ccs:�� ., orr a}13� , t12 �fl»t�Q. il ,2101 £"1'+ n�'► St'#�L ►ale .Os� coUa14 Ut �'0ri4"•jT�'�``�' , �t i '77717 C,,, - s i11. v£ Ca:al itt£ #+t;tillC:l�'� 11 111. ��� -ti� m,;T e .: ''';;• - j. X �; `s�11 ..; . L �, , ,.o ►r a. off'` Lhz Canter i�:e. ou�Ly i4ai3 . ,. 4fa ♦. ri�?...!' GHQ " ri r � X ,4 _ -.� fir' :•46 # �11.11 ,. .. 1 4Le"�StiI iiii 'c: atl,, , M1VQl:�C�E.'!E`" Y' �'•sd .�. yx 4i.aw.� :, . L S .... it►�.' k?32,. U C:',V, -- ,,�..11" ��,t; ; ,U . , 't .,� ,` � "7.�,�,r�, t� s +tom �3 1 •�., +� a• ' (/�j\/ �a* `.s c•1ft`•►ca *C .� 7t CF ?'xa�.�,. 4+-x!G"i-�sG'R .Z i L 3+.•. sY�..- x.� � i1.2.�i1 �.M� �.M 'T'I t n 4#d J'MC►�' art ' _ fi,'$.rY i-` r^ 4, ,}rf aYi - t. .F��c 7F X4.7 -S' y,�rh ,, xC ,. F } B: 'l its o• *lo: ?u is A��crttc • t'.ss; �e-11xn�iaa�e tot =a� -= u f .� :,,.,:.v.j. ' 3:i «Tv°, �:- �*•,r ryM ., `..Y}°° ', •/�Nr c tete .ta' t G= z�"ei fx t: ,> ,-Y ' at2�.i11. ,?�,M tM � S/ ■ M 4iI Mi 11 { . 'i T Rf �f 1 p �Ri�ev�FY � • a Y. X ��'> Y4 :y :$ .�.' »,^ .i .� 'f M +i'F w'ti{lyRM1 ;'1- _ 7 a• -- IN, 'x•` �f4.• wA i �„yYK"� (Mt« r+`,t' t:oz ;ul"t;4 .+ i.; ,xY+ t '% x„ii�., t#kA tr .*iiC;" 4a�4 t it �.fli ,; Gc.�• .a•S rq,, - , ," �v�.1 ,It '�.t,'. r ''" i�*i`..,fir "►1 •. t }n',..4r M -1-, , �•f x Rte' a ¢ jf, I w''.a 2 t�tq"i ,�'S Ta*, ,4-,• •� 4Ii ,; ,, i• +�"'�'2•'� Zt _�1 ;«�'+�.I 14i `'■�.. L�ne�r "is5*' ,Ma �4.1F.e4.f MC . �'Ta,�"•r C''..w�°.wk '�'6�•6�'"' rt...t.v°r ts•.1 k . ,/4 }t�/...,, 0�:+,.a ,'.4Ly ,;� .l) «wC J 41�V4 ,ol � 4,.- ,'rs+ X Ly'�e�!r'N.r^,„J, '"' .J'r-«F'T+:fi,�j t q'�i ,*✓s a �� -;., v-£»t�u"4 ',ter �,,=i -.v'�rb'.,rr.d : f I 11 4+ .Z ! e ti.et,2 x s X`F ''v}R• t C• .+ .w+ «�i,.. _',,, 7 02` U:liit'�.'.' •1J,. �%+flL"�i.?1:`4 s*`, L l�*11: r".+►« o s.k w3 t� .; G �71si fi�ts0,;,""�-"'I Qk. 4�. ", "«,.�Cw t. "" - t Y -il slA1 y* 4 •Ui,. �1♦I}✓+a }}+��.Mi.ir­. D{,►n. ,�.r�i'�4R'•x a•/a��,r,i.♦♦414�wi �.�lw�:'� Y••fi% ►#,61tiY a'4"�s a•�.,+'i..ad'.. +fid.z�n*' .s+.,. .Y'+. —„ .a;,t_, t ,--- r`',S ,34 1. �{�. l.•�11 M tA'rfV V� M..w � Ail 1a1�,► -, n ,: _ f 1 X i� 1 }!}�` Y f'S `� "� p. 2` is t } . f t "t is t �:Y+' t' pf x t +�+ `► '• ryP”' •M {�, n. '; �,#„i w4+Mil�i �w i k sem, Mi S.e.Yw�7�.4r iM� ka9.., ' .aM" ova • �:x,,.'4 ��n+ -•�. L�. .?e"1�: ». �t7s a+'t �'+S r.++e ".�y.t f .>E '" s " t 'x*' ,a�,a.v,� } r ""'11�'.�."� N l s1 •;',S ♦♦lrt y. � ,7 „ + , 5 f N k''{ 'i' F C.QrZ.J.1. "a'L:Ri'-E�.��'ti {,.;a;2�1.�.Lrs�£ ^+. +, f,i2w. 4.M h+�• ��t" ' 3 x sr 3` } C '" [ s ' Nt# a 71' ,,7 t ". K e a+ d X •�' ?�2�ti'2ea•3r?.3'..,1 a 1► oli� '►sic'-Ir f3i .ir$x '".Cljl- "►: � t.f--11'1-"d ►t s1£>v ".*`76'''►.r,�r"s• 11 x x, 11 ��`s-p•. �4.• .J..,• ,.; w :♦♦yy • ,-.q'• a' ,0 R� �zk TF ''R,k'k n7, +'1F •.4.T'�.FtY .. i fi`i rM ire c*7`, `,.s h.� t a1C:•: 'aa�'t+a.+J .�. �a+.w 'Ai #&'�'iE y'y'4i�r. +.ir 4'�+P.,- a'."k six mss ,t ,,."W"'"t' „•. +r a_'r:MS+r' r ice'' t y:'r`'t ,r}2.,e k`�„ ., n "�», �',, s .li"' "`s '"'.a:�. �: �4' ;1.4 wr*r r�- rav r ."� r r i .:: a ( *y xej '� a'•- y, ! t me q, y �:.,z I' �,r '`. +Y. 4; a rrws ...it•* r �I e'-n" ��} ,zCx fi- �,i.S♦ l.a, .4, z+ i 'aaw r ��i,.lE " # ,ar i+lr 4 .""'+t', zz �, "r,»y n z#�y P .€- ts, 'r n„r Ki - ,kir a �,x.T t S g 7 xr+� 5., .r . • a,, a i r �, , ,� F - 'fit"tt n+ �z ,�. r s rz.^:,fix - ,yt^ ,aa" ,� r 4 t� ?._ • 4,1=-- e��•..I.►a..+Ers.: � 4n,.2 �► >. Sys -+,ua n. ,z �, `. 'a�*�Y"t a 1 'k 51 r,' :;, e ti k a r 2 .FS x ''y 5' '. '^'t{9 '..w'gSa r r d X F r 3",a,a3 �' T";. rtstt d e,� , ,ra Q-h��j'[��-� $s r ? YlxMx•irMt l��.x!'�MVMr{i"�FMGiB' ra�k ,*y`rt`a- a: *+ a11 w 003. 35,Q ,;.:.. r ?APPENDIX A I of 3 N OV'5 1915 Geotechnical Consultants pllBLIC WORKS D'ci'ARiI`nEXT PORTOBELLO OrF ICE CEINTER ELEVEN ELIBARCADERO WEST. OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA M7, 415/839-1680 hiat ewber 3, !9,75 PK-119, 0 a5r_.,,lr Mr. Y icor Sauer Cont.-c. CL'Seitz Court-/ Public Works Department S:h rla:.r, Ackninistration Sid-. alcrt;r,a_-, 'CcUfarn:o 94553 At:snntir,n: Mr. Lcr.;• Reagan RE: FOUNDATION l,\!`rST:GATiQ!-I FARIC, AVEHUE A.D MARSH CiEEK ROAD BRIDGES C^.%:TF CCtST4 C^E;::;i', C;LEFOR'NIA 4 In accotdonce with your request, we cre pleased to submit the ioltoWL't proth>sc'l io petfunn foundation investigations Cor the propose; Pari i. Avenue nd i::;i:"ic Cce:.;k F.G:d r $�ioc;cs to be consir:,cte3 in Centra Costa Cas::ty, �.e+'sfio::tic. Gur .:can;cl ;s wed b; the: Cinira Cc:::4 County :;Erie- ::orki cn }.rcje:,S inrorracti„n ivmis!ler`' to ��s *y ? Deporimeni- stoic, a review o. available sur:oce.rine: wtm,r`cce inforanGtion :c:th twobricge laratiotns and our visits to the hvo sitCs. Park A:•t:nt.;e Bridge The Pa.-it Avenue Bridge will :e c mstructed io re-piece the existing brid'ce v�h:ch cr,�,;.;es V' it-.Iczi Cre4'k-opproxinnatey "Co fCet west of !P-i of Park :Avenue v.'t::' Ock.. Sireet near the a;tp limits of Richtncrd. !f is our un3ersiandi-g that rhe -ew I,:idae uiit be a timvo—lane "Super-Spon" type st-:C, brill-ge. ►i a brtucc ar:11 :per C df GptJ...'Tn:niG.aCiY 30 UY Gporox. �•0 :C, fCCa and "Ct2ftfor U4 ►F ap:L i 1 4 • The site. a. the'Pr-,Pasao crossi^.9 :s Q tia:ro:v ccny_.'1 -"';ci1 6-15 tif.:.C'd as Creck rvi :I:ro-.,4 Ja7ricus t•!'^cCt1C Com,.-n-warin vC: C3fl�:�^•r:Jl v cr.d =en ronce 'strT• :.lay- ^ena and sa of—; !o roci►S a a l .4aU:lJe.-_. Rise;: s;cies ,of the carycncte .zo��r_:t"l u st a_t+ cn:i rjb: . r to ;-.xdsl ecus A Lehr S:tL' 1i'�1:, a 0.AC-Icre rrncrere ortep:! wc; .-.e:ng wea ro croir th_: •r:mow. t I Microfilmed with board order 00336 - 00 J36 a . . APPENDIX k 2 of 3 Contra Cosio County - \ove.nber 3, 1975,. 0 Arch Pcge 2 Mcrsh Creek Paid 11ciace_ i ?l:e prapc:cd 1.lc moi: Cie^:: Roc' Bridge ..ill cc;.—./ irefftc over Marsh, Cme:: appro; ..defy 1,500 feet east of :lie in:_rSectiLn of Marsh Creek Riad with Deer Valley Road :n tt:e easter, end of Contra Costa County. It is our understanding that ei:''ner a "Super-Spr,n" type aridge or a conventional single span concrete bridge are being considered. Ho "St.,per-S;m—." bridge is tsed, it will be app.oxisnately the same s cs as the Pork Avenue bridge. +f a cc:ve.^.tiorc: s: pie spot cc:tcce. bridge is used, the bridge w;—,, sp;,n approximately 7% feel fron cbutMfnt to cbu". ert. The Marsh Creek Recd £ridge will 5e constructed in an area of gently roWng terrain wiih minor vegetation except or scahe:ed trees. The bridge site is likely underlain bac alluvial r.;ctericls which in tum ere underlain by sandsione or the.iacquin Fridge Formation. Ai- ihe time at our site visit, a nprscw tv.*Aare steei bridge wcs used to cross the creek. Based or. the expecier' foundation cundiiionb in the proposer{ bridge foe.tions and the c.iticil-ated b:ijce loods, we recommend the following scope of work nor each of our investign:ions: L Perform. a field subbsi-rface exploration Fro?ram for tire- proposed bridgen-'en}er the dirt:.:i;.r. or our sail c:tainec. w'-.a \w„t:ld s:tr� UL-:, lag a .d r:IF:a 7 ,:o:;ri:zuous f.iyf;t cu r or :cicr y wash bo lags #hot wiil be extended to o ttmoximum depth of about 70 faet. eI&ive!v undisturbed samples %.ould ire recovered from the borings using the 1N"x'ici,d Cclifornia Scmpier as well as .hin-wull Shelby Tu'aes, as required. In addition, the Siartdord PC.-le!,ction Resistance, in which a 2-inch O.D. Split Spoen Sampler is driven 1.3 feet with a 140round hamster fal!ing 30 inches, wii1 isc determineu of se:ected depths r. G . 6 r o C' .c::haic. The S onca:� Pena: • —i OlSt ei`�:a` Qt in-piece si-enaih of aratu`!o-_ so 17 cand -:ts s rnp!:s ;a be obtotned r'o: Gtcsssitt�'GtE•: cnd sobC?rator-, tact in.9 -VrY^-ses. %:"E would al:o perform torvcne and nentrctn9rr-r in tt-e field end apprcrtp-:^:e sip?--s re„versd 1'rn she co in.-p- 2. t.aboro!cry testing of "relatively'" vrciisiurbad samples cs w-all as bulk sa:rpE^r obtainecd ffom &%e bGCi.:gs. Th:s .eauld itw:.lude u:assif;catiop, index and strength testing as required. 3. 'Syil enaince;I .g -1 rvCiuition o7 resulting field --nd loboratz:.ry ids' dasta. 4. o: cur rvivr p-eseri.ing, as eppliccb:t!, but' rot ;::1.;.� a. Ph sic,;s }ioper4':cs aad c:taracterisi;cs a, the mcA4--_finis underlying L.^.e si;e. 00337 t apprd i x 8. 1 of .R ,. l.• w * ate x: 1-1 - Y -4`� :s �''* "x5y 1 g.F a '�'4+ .,.m c V `�`'p k X-1 d I ,� s F. p k az r`d �,.� �'.e"1 I y �" '" `� �r n aH" ur�*"' vc rd"K k t ,Cy. vs t r r P, �+§�'t}"x��3." �4 ter.i c r b c-' ,� �� A iJJyy� ,�,. Y q ti C tc }ry 1 `f• � h F. �14 fi ti ? '' `� 'e$�' {' '*.^t,{ `,1 ,.� I'Y V4 K'Z S .iWH'�&l'�� t %.� �y t'"11 � { 4".: `� >E k. �s 1F'Vit' r"s*s.S' rr� T L ;..'ti ,a°�x. "�x.,m qtr'y,.5�,xs ' ��,`"' ,� k9 .5 "des yet o - -f "*� e' 'y.^'`"5 .� �'" a 7 '� y - -�,.�;> e a' t.. -11 x -1+. `-d�t„,� ','w+. Cts^.0 �`"` :L ,�;-""-� "' �'z ',.�',.cam::"Ir ., .; s- 'ti��rtn�d�� , . �e"' r "" t.t°��, "y. rf t 5a .,` ,,. Lw. /1+ •w7av�.ve� F�"'.. `g 'i ! x, ' gyp" s ,~k ` 11 I 1,L' "ky^�''y�,-.v ."b r'r E f-. �'t t'i x=da" ,,,--1 ,�r r`„�,:rte-Ki,.�.._eS�w,�._t,Adz-1���.,��'..+���!'�„ } 'i' sF. }x . i v,,� £��^-'n, 'W n rd p� :vim` r. .�9 ;, V."+►�1 �7i�fi✓��K 38"-,��,.,3.*' % i is a'l '` _ ti s. z r �:i .� .'>. :��..,5� " t kS4 4k aG: ,"t� i}nr itr''' N_ z-'"mp` if' 1.11 d"x a ,r d ft- 1 .� i' `Yt. .,+'�,71 �£ i z yds Yy .i 1. 11i 5 1. i,!-I'V�L,`.�I", a° 1 , :. +dt�Et!' R.s:a�wi'�..G�"'�!• '•w l. w.�o»RfT+at«^3-.i a{o Aiez mix/ ` 1-1 11` ;1::16 p1.114�►oni�t . hG� 0I.1tL` l�cF , (�rsussol�s l o,.a s - or.+,ue4!fa c�^d�+ ' aarc►averag t :ss*abs Grf c.7V►iWdt,ae+,n�a4'�FRw^ ,.+�a fN►e+4}*4C'I.,+" ."}�;'CI�'7*�."�''"� { : , g a•. twE.^,il. +++a �00�"'i�'1•+UOZ'+A,�O.fl•Mi�.1.aw.. - kn, sr �?w' �xufsrs,e.c a,7.y f d (� ¢ £ _ 4 `4 t1 } v. �„� g�,r 'rF a'r ...r.�� '. ',,�c,,, t a I + C �, s `- ..�...C� ,} Y<k i ,- - a x x - `J L�..�'•�T . R^�"T', -—, ,ACX lMiR ",*+ r! 3 r` �.��' .� ,:..M, c r ;. a �•'D �"'�R'" �9MF tmwR'.�Q KIt'4� ,`. +,z ' i at **X' Fra,. Y t :/WK�06ii+ 4� I -5,�.r°sr.,.,I;, y k n - "" i �'�r'' $r 4 f ar i lI I . a F S 3 - —Y '. • ln�oo`orF r•1Catdfapecand.tss!!eol.%+f�i&re�as�?�d st 11 T, • 'f w f1e am ���_C�01!t, ..�a j -�i,'.tl:�!'Nh' Of: �L61Uf tot"Td16""-1.a C.GFr�yt.L i Cw :: _.+f s' i ,+ r ��,y •e ^� • 1, I ,• ..+,�+�`�" i :�SY'.7"•G4 iP'SiiYkR?/4t'Z L'>�Y�af'j.�"'fyf�wilr -7`' -r � Ao! ''Z •.C�rs".•.t+'1 Csx'P►"". '►;n t *f Cj�. . . `.rte..,.:iP4 Win IL " ose;;CRlK tF1s�tG "fir '1. ' a�iM"b!� -..;A�'. +�D:1�t.,j"Iv: ..^�`3.�'its '^� 'w:ljutr-.33�"'"'f' '• r 4a,-..oat. ::a a"w"eaR.iti'. of x;a•ye .. . ' . r . . . • - - rf;tis oo,•.I cKy+. �pM,+,�his pca�vs.v�a«srnr`cazr 2�t+ry iCok#wer t raiforia s-Twc C.�e+.t lest++*ses �' sx+�sixta s:�ntrs r,2fCw�.ttr+c s+o.rr f lepusz+ts n+sroa+s ef, r ofr., a„ es,silt%;w wat:ifttm a cr c=e wd%M,t.a :ty•r ariss3..+rRk. , c *ie'x eons+Fx:•��ev�icac _ Q ;fin:;«i ' v..-- dr.::,!~y f,I VI F p ,�.-tvt scaee a sia;t�!:aca1:of f'we fi- " *wos-s• • , . o.^t s _ �.. :. , . . _. -... �,� , _ . ,.. ..,-. - . '.. ,_ f _ -.. .. - J..• r .....% • ,. ? eas+.s ar rrtref i- �+se1►K e+wePkt I, ,h+r�.s6k^vr-, k,c.- a..,11.,.a:crnFf. !w?rcis+:: as sc+•:.c+a.,fiil.be s fS.aitt►�at oraR oFtio�,a+ss wa^e t- +**«;*OCV...e.s UW,Ot '"�'r"7 -— " .11 bafamI VIA t�Jsj wkw'l c"e,4 aF�f!'•'+s:+Mu•+71*d,r,„•,, J r • +• ' tlwit is tiU a lec ••.�woi-vr fern, ra L ' „ - • 4 I 11 mar ez..s l Err f�f�.ewp N ife E;..tac ag Pi,,' a, oasRe.+ ! +a yp�sY:.K..r n ;�ca#ear*+• n"x �" *" . . _ ; i ; , tt+»+eera Att',o" - coaMwc�aE'. frons :kms cr la�i«&►a:apt: Tc'r-, #G rn"c a tl4 F 'Sct marts rncur�e=5Y. i,it.+<v t , �"Rr %04 , or ocrne•.!r 11, tj•C Cl"ls+R►. ?+iM atdron+a�.3 Auo2 s«.do at, t► "�""�•a�1_ !ti''t7 +{- y�_y `srurcel R"X►*kSfGt'.t.>w'a''e+""'sG i�'►s "^t'.- !, ,` ....t., / fiF -NIS^^'^! A.I11i'W# y ,t2+"w}"i.� "r '�'+y .hiss •}y{ K- f l �z',�sE,as f3f . ...... ,� li vst f.af.,te'e!i 'Im .fess'"s 4 w RiK"A��1 1 �R 'rvk,� - 'M"�, 7 �� �__ I. 11 ,-',' ; b`"333. � r lJ " — I i,� I I �, ,r -1 , � —:, I � I�, 11 1 .1 - - � — I ��—,­ , -� : " ", - ,r�,�___� r,I ,�, � -"r � I I I I :�.��,� , - - ,�"'-"','_�"��l,,;.�,,,i�,��. `11- I� --;�, , . 1',l�1,e. I � � " 1� , ,:-r I, ,,"" I I r - � I i�, ,_r,_,_ , L �, 'r- ,, ,— � " , I .1 . � .I 11 I I � I Ir I . � �r� I I I I r r . - �, " } ;"�i.; _,�-- ,r, , " : . �I ,, � r - � . : � �-�- , y '.J'� e �'(� �, .. � , �--` ­ "—� , � , , I r I - ". �l � , —' ' ' , -- I I ,". I ��. :�, `4"'I �l � , �­` ","' �,� I� � I I �- , I I I 11 ,� , , , , ^: . , I � r -- I — � . 11 r I � _ '' — -:l I I �,� I I � r . � I � I I I -, , , r E APPENDIX A S of 3 Contra Costa County No errbz.- 3, 1975, C 653 Paye 3 b. Foundation design recommendations for various type- of foundations including deep foun3c+ions such as piles a: Feissions, :f necessary. e. Design recommerdotians for bridge excavations end bact:fill. Our services v-rould be provided in accordance with the rate: end 'cents :hos-:n on our standard fee schedule a copy of which is prir.:ed on the revere side of the last pcge of 44-his proposal. Vie estimote that the cost of our foundation study,for the Marsh Creep hood 3ridce will range between 52,88 and S3,2CG and we would not exceed laza latter amount without your prior cprrovcl. Because of tfie uncertciey of !%a sub- surface corditior•s at the Pcrk Avenue site, the costs of our foundation invest- Lotion for this bridge could vary considerably. If elluvivl-ty a materials ere enccuntered and the drilling of !!ie eyploratary borings roes reasonably well, then .:e estir.=!e that our costs would be bet-neen S2,400 and $2,7W. However, if boulders cn: rocs are encountered resulting in difficult drilling, our costs could rise :o Lehveen $3,1= and $3,500. We should i:ote that this est;coate osvimes that Contra Cosies County will supply the locations of all underround utilities in proposed 'boring !xaticns .and will secure any necessary eccess permits. J:::prafcs.".=c: x-.—%, dhc!! bo p�rso.:..od, our findi:ys acd cnd our :eco::,,►:endations prepered :n accorr:c:ce wkh generally accepted engineering principles and practices. This warrent/ is in lieu of ail other v:errcr.ties eiiher expressed or implied. We cnticipate that, after receiving your cuthorizction to proceed, :•:e wouid stet our field W3rl w:!hrn hvo cr three days. We propose to camp-l--!e o::r stop/ `::::1:in three and one half and four and one he!f weeks. We thcnk you for consideration of our firm crA look fon:•crd to boing of s_rrice to you in !h'-s rrc:,ec:. Very truly }Our., PETER KALDVLEER AND. ASS%0C:RTES Peter Ka!dveer i'K:sr:, . Copies: Addresses: (31 Ncce,-*e-6 oY_ Dote _ __-- 00339 Ssts-»wrr, 10, 1475 APPENDIX c az ; } PUtR aAt. _r AND ASSGC!ATcS SC'l DDE or a.A2G:..FC;Z i1+3.^.r.:+: .rf .cSTS Ua:t cims9es%r Icbcsators testing;ntiade the nmramal :c6wcln•-•,.wA-e.•d reporting of rew-Its a.siy, 11--r-sw:l, sprci-st or vuo!e pveauction a:special- tesu cre billed at our larru 6asrly (ee sc+chute rr•►e:. C!no-ges Err tests U+ich o:e nit l;:ted will he given upon r:quest. Speciai a nsk6sc:"sat.rii:be giv-_s For iesge ftuah=of tens. A. CLASS:.=IC ATICttiV.-N-DEX PPOPERitE !. Vlj:et :aa:ent en-41 V:sazl Ci-ssu:carton 'USCS'(ASTaM-aDZZZ. 02QT) $ ;.5a • Ori;hoc' ;.i::a 7ia:t-Canrcnt c_ 3Strengtr 14v Tcrvona or h aetttaeter •. 1.30 4. Atrc =z-z, _i=i:s''AST.._423, 0124) 35-60 5. Stuinlcr3e Licnit (AS 0:27) 22.00 5. Slat:is Grzvicy k'ASTAT GG54) lin dupRca;V) 22.00 7. Sieve Amlys'ns, Dry(AMIA G427j 20.0 S. Sieve A-•oh.sis, V."as7red(AST.:0422) 30.00 9. i:)r.!=eler Ana'ysis(lSTJ% 30.OD 10. Cams ic-t-6 Anosytis, -Vwned S:rv_ Plus F.ird-.meter 6G.CD 11. Sond Equi vier::(ASIA:02419) 20.0D 12. °.psi.Thros.Sh Ma. 203 Sieve 10.W $. COMP:.tON P40FERT1ES 1. ASTIM 0:557, ASTM LO-198, AASHO T-180. AASKO-T9:' E3--;tela dkmete*Mold) MOO 2. AST!-.0&55?. ASTM D699, A A-CHO T-120. AASHO-T49 - �J-inch diameter r.-old) 8040 3. Cat-i,:�z=;(CaViamin Mct1-a3 216) 7ti_00 4. itelctive 0e„;:?(l,• r: pry f tetinz(ASTM DZGG%9) a-o!ed C•si;. Z is hNr;we:o;: ars o. r_,itp Cats:ssonless Sail Request •\r.:un, i:a:fVQ1e% (wl:iwnio!.!pima 3'Si-Ft SSUVA ter F.E. 93.CO B. "it-Vaiute, Treats-d. Li-.-,-or Centers!(C-- o-nia.Act!•a:l.+V2-F) ?8.1:0 C. VAECFA1vICAL PPO'?ER:I=-S :. a'3;rect shear, tlnd;sturbed. Urcu=d (t S1L'.03(ar Saturn t-.-ord latae?=tics;) 30.E 2. Oirc.t 91-aa-, mem-_Hed. Cr:--cir (Y S13.0 iar Satn-ati�n T.i»s"ina; QO.CO 3. Unav shed t_ mFersi-.e Swer•r:s(A;Teal 023.4) (-nc_k-ds :_r canons and dry densi y c-:astincric a) (v SIO.OU for Streu-Susi.Plot) Mao _ -:. Tr;�oaial Cat-,rr�s:a.-: tlrs�rS�:ir'a!�*2.°t,'.'xueirkai(iracet.c.K waiet gnr�a: - and dry density dc:e-'asi.'acrianl (SM.t-r3(cr two eacit'r.•cl ply.«) '��`_CK1 5. Triaxial 1ccMgwes3ca•:, tlnrsr:aii�--a?'llracfxainedfSo:.rrstesi Q•s;.t.d 8. rricuiol Ca-ar-rc-:-_n; ;p ssali�z:.d;li►4.nis.��i •7_ Triox;cl C.orapres:on; Cara.nt�t :er„�'�+ -�i:*ev�Sasrr�ca S. Mw%*.ul C=jrass;un: r,.^.n•-iica c;wairnr R.:gvss. 9- Sw*11. Single}'o;-+t, Unchm--•iced �•M.0`J ;0. Swell. Single romr, .s c:-c6c i 11. Volume Ctstnr„e- R-16 3.sn•s!ure-SstuM:is••-Ah D:;-^.r-_art D 55.00 i,. t9.T.••s0:•:►Ot- (A37W U.C425. laciu-:N.s Time con?'awan E.*Lt; P Cur.,.:s =J= i3. 'err:csbiiitw le-.!. .ka, . isi a ie^s�:s Grua► la. ?err,.:b::its 1e.:, ,':•.:.s-t-:uc ts.ml:rsrp:n art 15. Pert*rebii;ty Tr_:, 16. ?4tmCc4);Gry-Density;:elct;=--j,;g •AlultiF?a. tes;S Can be,a-rio-r d%! D. cOLIUMAVOT RENTAL J. S1c•ne Ind;rnt•fr l,sctiwg.r.r•e. wits Cp. ra-. <sru:i�.rn., cS.U(2 3 isaarts 225.00 3 n V 2. Sr•:^•ie F.ei..sd;•s' ;•r.,-r t Eaess (ntiin.j M..'23 � 8 tours J{•i.ETi Z of .., HOURLY RATE SCHMULt Engineers •7. tsiox,ai . %- $. TriCa".ql .: +,p+es:iasn; �_:n'�+i;cYt:..`r`�•T•;�inC' _ 9. Sweil, Sinaie ro;r,t, itnrK.y-•+itr•! M. Swnli, Singe co;nr, wc'r.Clie 11. Volume Cmoge- Rrtd hAnhhve-Sztw. -A74 Dr, -03 we ur;- 55.00 12. CAST&* W"S7,Inciu%Nns Time tAmprossion &a l.a;P Curs.-; - 2w--M 13. t UW-4 1A. Lfrup;e z 15. Perw.ecb;i;y Tc-.-. s^...;m!.e 16. Permeulul;ry-Density Ret..t;=-.h;p ZaTiest 0AA016p .—w tests can be Prrfo•ro.-i o. ;:GLtt=4%1%EMT s,NTAL InXr»t x Inct:••n•ro.e. wits Cir^..":'t -. 4 :krw%VX-J, '>i's.tlts a* 0030 2. SP;.'M;c Peimc#;7- ;+taer t imurs I,N;n., AFpctl o . k 14 f HOURLY RATE SCHE'DULc" Engineers Peter ICaldveer W.00 Richard Short {Associote ��"� P,icnord 8ajuniBemi odgcrs (Sr. En �I� Ronald g'�.00 Alan 2$, 17 i�ropp 27.22 Technicians Potrich S#evens00 - Dovid Sa-jderield '�' !6,00 Office Sandra auras- 1207� Cullen Schousten .7! 9.60 Pe .60 '' ' LSI' Q . -'F veotecli,ic,l Consulta� •.•• �+ • - its Pa,f T OBEILLa OFFICE CEh+ER - �nr "'."AR ERR V,rsT, OAKMN©. CAUFORMIA 94 607. 41&839-ma - 0034 . k In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 $ 19 75 In the Matter of Rental Agreement with Gloria Dodd, D.V.M. (Work Order 4805) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute a Land Use Agreement with Gloria Dodd, D.V.M. for rental of vacant County property on San Ramon Valley Boulevard, north of Crow Canyon Road. Said property is to be used for landscaping and sign purposes in'exchange for weed abatement, maintenance and care of the property. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and eorred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originated from Real Property Div. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this 16th day of December . 1975 Real Property Division n J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M Ccps-cnce Dines i I 0042 J i..+.....rte Cow.-ty Project iTe: L.U.P. 324-?2 Road Rr,, 4301C San P.amon .'a i l e Fled. LAND USE AGREEFENT This Agreement, :rade in duplicate this q dray of 2H:(=ff:: 4gsf , 1975, by and between the COUNTY OF CC 'TRA COSTA, hereinaf ter designated as COUNTY, and the undersigned, designated as TENANT, who hereby agrees to case property (pined by the County of Contra Costa, described as follows: shat property outlined in red on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and . :wade a part hereof, being vacant land. Said property to be used for the follor:ing and no other nuraOses: Landscaping and sign ,urposcs. Said lards<<mplz j and nig;. subject to approval by the CG' NTY Planning Department. An encroach»ent resit for the sign riust be cbtained fr,n the COU.Nri Public ::orfs Department- In consideration for said use TcRWA hereby approves, agrees and consents to the following Lerais and conditions: (1) To keep property in a neat, clean and orderly condition at all times during occupancy, and not permit rvbbish, tin cans, garbage, etc., to accunnulate at any time; to take reasonable care of said property, including seed abatement; not to cam. it, suffer or pemit any waste of s84,.d preerises or any acts to to done in violation of any tars or ordinances; nor to use or permit the use of said premises for any illegal or is:moral pu:-.poses; and to carpiy .-Wlr. all State tars and Incal ordinances conccrning said property and the use therewf. (2) Not to let or sublet the whole cr any portion of the property, nor to assign this tenancy to a third party, nor to male or suffer ary alte:aticns to be rade in or on said property, without first obtaining the written consent of COUNM In the event of a breach of this condition, COUN—H shall have tihe saner to izrnediateiy declare this agreement termtnaied and mill trereu;;on be, enti fled �o inmediate possession of the property_ (3) The TENANT :ill give the COWITY t;,irty (10) days notice o: intention to move or vacate. t;e property and upon such vacation agrees to leave same in as good condition as existed as of the day possession of the property, was taken, allowing, of course, for ordinary and normal us►:.;e du:-:ng occupancy; and to rei-w- burse COUNTY for any damage done to said property, caussid Gy T"::.at"s occupation or tenancy, other than that due to no:in.;l use. (4) TENANT agrees toA•defand, i ndej.ni�y oral hold ha:•sm b css tl;A CIUNTf G` and :roa ars; and all claims. GQiands, ccsts, L.�.^•ag2s, 1osSes, -_-1USBS 3' action or judgments which sc—Ou6*7Y may pay or re,ui:ed to pay bl rea::on G: art,. damage, including inverse cordernation, in;;ury or death ;.o arty person cr property suffered by any person, firm., or corporation as a result of the exercise by TENANI Of the rights herein 5rartt,u to it. 00343 Miuofitmed with board order (5) TENANT shall provide a _rc l f irate of Insr:r anCe fO.' CU;Dl is liability and property, damage in an amount of not less than 5100,000 for one person and S300,000 for one accident and $50,000 property dar:race. COUNTY to be additional insured and notice to be given COUNTY at lease ten days prior-to cancellation or change of said policy. (o) To vacate said premises at any t ^:e within thirty (301 days after receipt of a notice so to do from COU;TY; and failing to vacate as nerain provided, agrees that COUNTY, or its authorized agents, ray enter upon said property and remove TENANT's personal property therefrwi, and in this event TENANT waives any and al; claims for damages against COUNTY, its agents or employees. Nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of any rights of CCURTY to demand and obtain possession of said premises in accordance t::th ]a-et in the event of a violation on TEN•ti'!T's part of any of the terms or conditions hereof. (7) Upon vacation of the premises for any reason. TENANT shall renove all its improvements frac the premises, and failing to do so, ags•ees that COUNTY, or its authorized agents, may remove said n-tproverments; and agrees to refirburse COUNTY for all COUN'ZY's costs of said removal. TERA111T ::aives any an"' all clair.:s- against COUNTY resulting fron TENANT's or COUNTY's removal of said improvements. (8) COUNTY's agent may inspect the pre :ices at any time daring this tenancy. (9) That the premises are rented on an AS IS basis and COUXT•t will not make any improvements or repairs on said property of any nature :,hatsee.•ar, and that no credit will be allowed TEMAUT by COUNTY for tl:e cost of ary repair work performed or ordered done by TENANT. RECO*SfENDED FOR APPROYPI: ily Real Prcpzrty Agent ACCEP 0: zw ubtic t:+or ks Gtbr Gloria Codd. �t_Y_i:. Tsy 1,41 ,;!1'-7- c►:AiIT NUN9 - _ R/1y abandonment by County`-~✓._ Instr. � Recorded Vol. 1�Page—� 01��. � Up ub t i c l'•a• �.� Gi..z'' 0 `f4 1, ' 7- RAV Abandonment by County Instr. �- i Recorded Vol. page 004-0 • . ,�= 1=75' J Ile F:UN h y -.� t �� J p• moo. U 4am If V ► ,t,, —` �� S. 50) LIN" LP IN 4(0 10 Sa•;�•.�5'!OY/A?�, t,., J P� '10 tit, 1.e (�0• \j � L p� ;; c �} J t0 1';� ,,�, Lit 1 J •� ilV Cq C _ VIA A 1t 6 5:2,,F �C.^ CA It ,� .5 70 Fes" �• �� � .:,�3 G.:' r"_ ._ .. _ 9-9 r IV i — crtl CONTRA CCSTA C PUXIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CC.�:t+r2.�. .•'.i C.viii:-�/ r`•"LTt~:.�.— %-IAL!7Om!f1A ROAD No. 3r.?llC f Instr. -�i�.•L�i tom=E J ; '•`iXT p,= %4"=i y Recorded Vol page ` v�'?: .ti!�.a`�, r,ri_L._ !� .". i�✓ .� �V ^! ,= IZ/Y/ ccnu;rcc by County , Instr. � ��:.� �.�r- /-/ Da.:scr: Recorded Vol. page CH;C za cY: Ltic.L. ':i.: ��• - 7S 1 009)45 E . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 _Z5 In the Matter of Executive Session. At 2:50 p.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54957, in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California to discuss a personnel matter. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. At 3:30 P.M. the Board reconvened in its Chambers' and adjourned. I hereby certify that the fonepohV Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 16th day of December 19 M J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufeld H 24 8/75 IOM 00 146 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 1975 In the Matter of Proposed Sale of Real Property, Walnut Creek Area. This being the time for the Board as ex officio the Governing Body of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to receive proposals and auction bids for the purchase of property located at the northeast corner of Oak Grove Road and Ygnacio Valley Road, Walnut Creek area; and The Clerk noted that no written proposals were re- ceived; and Th.ereu;?on "r. A. J. Accurso, Real Property Division, Public Works Depa.+rtrent, called for oral bids and there being none, stated that the department would advertise again at a later date. f No order--matter of record only. I heresy certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of AWN2 l . ii dviid on therd minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supe affixed this 16th day of December 19 '5 r1 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By F�+ i'-t:, +t:/1�.T . Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz H 24 8/75 IOU ;,j J` f r In the Board of Supervisors of • Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 197,E In the Matter of Authorizing County Counsel to Accept Service on Behalf of the County. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Office of the County Counsel is AUTHORIZED to accept service on behalf of the County of a Summons and Complaint in the case of the City of Lafayette vs. The County of Contra Costa (regarding the proposed closure of Happy Valley Road by the City) Superior Court Action No. 159388. ' PASSED on December 16, 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess NOES: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty ABSENT: none I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote oforesaid. cc : County Counsel Witness my hand and the Sea[ of the Board of �pervisors County Administrator affixed this 16th dav of December , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz Q JE? H 23 v7s IOU I i In the Board of Supervisors i of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 5 In the Molter of Fixing a Hearing Date for Use of Proposed Logo on County Stationery. Mr. Arthur G. +ill, County Administrator, having furnished the Board with a memorar=dum concerning the proposal that a logo be _ utilized on county stationery and business cards, and having pointed out that by standardization of the design and placing one large order for various county departments, a substantial savings could be real— ized; and Mr. hill having emphasized that the logo will not replace the County Seal; and Hr. Mill having recommended that a staff advisory committee be established to review other uses of the logo by various depart— ments; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having suggested that the Board hold a public hearing on the proposal before taking any action; I10:1 THERE. ORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that December 23, 1975 at 10:45 a.m. is fixed as the time for the hearing. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the dote aforesaid. cc: County Administrator � Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Penr+sors affixed this 1 t _ day of December , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Bjc •• 1, Lj-t eputy Clerk :conn - Shackles H 249 WS IOM 00 349 ,4, 0, 00- m-RRM R E OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR —J CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building �- Martinet, California To: Peso o S is rs Date: December 15, 1975 From. thur G. Will Subiect: Standardized County Stationery County Administrator Several months ago, you informally reviewed and approved a lay- out for standardized County stationery and business cards. The design (and the logo it incorporates) was presented to the County as a public service by Lafayette graphics designer Gerald Melcher. We have been working with the various County departments to as- certain their stationery needs. Until now, each department has had its own layout and has ordered its own stationery separately. By standardizing the design and placing all orders together, we are able not only to offer an attractive stationery with a County identity, but to obtain a favorable price. Wednesday, December 10, bids were opened for the printing of letterhead, envelopes and business cards. Ordinarily, we could have expected the price to increase by 10% from last year due to inflation. However, the lowest bids are less for the station- ery than last year. Cost of the letterhead and envelopes this year will be approximately $14,260, compared to last year's $15,185. This is a savings of $925 from last year, and is $2,444 less than we would probably have had to pay under the old system, considering an expected 10% inflation rate. The approximate cost of business .cards for 1976 will be $6,510, based on 700 orders a year. This is a $560 increase from last year's $5,950, but still $35 less than we might have expected with a 10% inflation factor. Considering the favorable cost factor and the benefits to be derived from use of an attractive design, we believe it is now advisable to proceed with ordering of the stationery and business cards, so that conversion could be made in February. (Depart- ments had been advised in July of our intentions so that supplies of the old stationery could be phased out.) We also recommend that a staff advisory committee be set up to review possible other uses of the logo where desired by various departments and where no extra cost is involved. MHD.jar mic,.oFlmed with booru oer'er 0 ! 50 In- .•.N_ based on 700 orders a y- - . year's $5,950, but still $35 less than wesyur. s a 10% inflation factor. Considering the favorable cost factor and the benefits to be derived from use of an attractive design, we believe it is now advisable to proceed with ordering of the stationery and business cards, so that conversion could be made in February. - (Depart- ments had been advised in July of our intentions so that supplies of the old stationery could be phased out.) We also recommend that a staff advisory committee be set up to review possible other uses of the logo where desired by various departments and where no extra cost is involved. MBD:jar m1Go6lmed with booru order 00-350 • R V Pr C- ont Costa G f - ♦ . rte. .. t A . , Z COU* - •' w . - • }A 7 - i ti • € o%j i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 19 Z5 In the Matter of Appointments of Commissioners to Fire Protection Districts of Contra Costa County. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following appointments are made to the Fire Protection Districts of Contra Costa County as indicated, for four-year terms ending on December 31, 1979: Bethel Island Oakley Mr. Ted Burnett Mr. Evo Baldocchi 4606 north Stone Road Route 2, Box 187 Bethel Island, CA 94511 Oakley, CA 94561 Barron Riverview Mr. Stanley Pereira Mr. Nel Whatley P.O. Box 132 212 H Street Byron, CA 94514 Antioch, CA 94509 Eastern Contra Costa County Mr. E. J. Mangini M,r. Harold E. Wildes P.O. Box 277 4002 Bellwood Court Concord, CA 94522 Concord, CA 94520 PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an ardor entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Districts Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of City of Antioch County Auditor-Controller affixed this 16th day of December . 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk r ByAwzte' ,) Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 00352 H 24 Ejis lora .,r.. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 7-5— In the Matter of Reappointment of Mr. Walter G. Treanor to the Civil Service Commission of Contra Costa County. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Walter G. Treanor, 5 Keith Drive, Orinda, California 94563, is REAPPOINTED to the Civil Service Commission of Contra Costa County fora four-year termending January 15, _1980. PASSED by the Board on December 16; 1975• I hereby certify that the forogoing is a true and coffee copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Wstness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Civil Service Cor-fission Supemson Director of Personnel affixed this 16th day of December . 1975 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON Clerk County Administrator By. r'ri^ Deputy Clerk Ronnie Boat 00353 H 24 SPS 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 19-75 In the Matter,of Appointing County Representative to Health Systems Agency Steering Committee. Mr. C. L. Van Marter, Director, Human Resources Agency having appeared before the Hoard and reported on the status of the application being developed by the Alameda-Contra Costa Counties Health Systems Agency Coordinating Committee, and on the application being developed by the staffs of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, for designation of the "Alameda- Contra Costa Health Systems Agency"; and Mr. Van Harter having advised that to complete its application process, the Coordinating Committee has established' an ll-member steering committee and that the two County Govern- ments are entitled to one representative each on the steering committee; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. C. L. Van Marter is APPOINTED as this county's representative. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing b a two and eorred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Alameda County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrator Supervisors Alameda County Director, affixed this iEth day of-lArorr,hPr 19 Health Care Services I R. OLSSON, Clerk Aenc Comprehensive Health 89=, " �--^ � Deputy Clerk Planning Association Rondalyr4 Shacklea Director, Human Resources Agency County Administrator 00 51 N 24 e/7s lam In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of A Recommendation of the Pl anr'si ng Commission that Land in the Alamo Area (1468-RZ) be Rezoned. (Ms. Janet S. Neill , Owner) The Director of planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission reconnends the rezoning of certain land fronting approximately 1 ,830 feet on the east side of El Pintado Road between Spring Lane and Dolphin Drive , Alamo area, from feneral Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-40 (R-AO) ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, January 13, 1976 at 10:45 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California , and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the LAFAYETTE SUN. PASSED by the Board on December 16 , 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. cc: 'as. Janet S. leill Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Su pervisorsList of 'tames Provided by P l a n n i n q affixed this 6 h day of December . 1975 Planning Commission i'- J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning By Deputy Clerk f�� Robbie Gli ierrezO H 24 a/75 101M 0 03 5 5 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , lg 75 In the Matter of Recomnendation of the Planning_ Commission that Land in the Orinda Area (1872-P7) be Pezoned. (Mr. Donald E. Manuel , -)caner) The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planninq Commission recommends the rezonin3 of 21.33 acres located at the southgesterl terminus of Donna 'taria Way and Dolores flay ("=Roraga Adobe"), Iri nda area, from Planned Unit District (P-1 ) to General Agricultural District (A-2) ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, January 13, 1976 at 10:45 a.m. in the Board Chambers , Room 107, administration Building , fine and Escobar Streets , ?Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the ORINDA SUN. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the fan"Min6 is a true and coffee copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Mr. Donald E. 'Manuel Witnen my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orinda Association .)rinda Association affixed " 15th day of December. 19 75 Pl anni nn Committee 77— J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Planning Commission Director o f P l a n n i n e By. Deputy Cleric Roh..ie Guy errez 001145 H 24 995 IOU N 24 a 75 18PA In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Moller of Report of the planning Commission on the Request of Mr. John S. Weightman (1914-RZ) to Rezone Land in the San Ramon Area. Theta One S Eta One Properties, Owners. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Cormission recommends approval of the request of 'fir. John S. Q. eigh than (1914-?Z) to rezone property fronting the south and east side of nld Crow Canyon Road, crest of San Ramon Valley Boulevard, San Ramon area, from General Agri- cultural Pistrict (q-?) to Limited ^ffice District (0-1 ); TT TS BY TPF S^4RD ?RDEoE9 that a hearino be held on Tuesday. January 13, 1975 at i0:50 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 197, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, 1artinez, California and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in THE VALLEY PIONEER. PASSED by the Board on December 15, 1975. 1 hereby asrdly that the foregoh b a true and correct copy of an order eidered on the minutes of sold Board of Supervisors on die dote ah esoid. cc: '!r. John S. Weightman Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Theta One Y Eta One properties alrimd tib lath day of December. 19 73 Director of P1 anni nn J. R. OLSSON, Clerk List of "tames Provided - by Planning Clerk Ro' hie GiPtierreo N 24 8175 lam 00T57 TJ7 .......... _.. .._.. : 4o�fi:R•., •a • •a _ s d In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19T5 In the Matter of Granting Extension of Time in Which to File the Final Map for Subdivision 4659, Danville Area. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the reciuest of DiGiorgio Development Corporation for a one—yeas extension of time in which to file the final mao for Subdivision 4659, Danville area, is GRANTED, thereby extending the final filing date to January 7, 1977. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the: minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC.- DiGiorgio Developm nt Super Corporation affixed this 16th day, of December-, 19 75 Director of Planning Public Works Director J. R. E3t.SSON, Clerk - By J . Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boal i ' 00358 H 24 8175 10M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Correction of Erroneous ) Assessments per Rev. & Tax ) BOARD ORDER Code 4832 and 4536.5 ) AUDITOR'S NDIO: Pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 4832 and 4336.5, I recommend correction of the following erroneous assessment. I consent H. DONALD FU 'K, Au tor JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By: A Deputy By: Deputy BOARD'S ORDER: Pursuant to the above authority and recommendation, the County Auditor is ordered to correct the roll as follows: For the Fiscal Year 1974-75 and 1975-76, in Tax Rate Area 79041, County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 159-100-003 and 159-100-004 assessed to Phillips Petroleum Company were erroneously canceled. The State of California, Department of Transportation only had easement rights on these parcels and due to a clerical error the Assessor's records indicated that these parcels were acquired by negotiated purchase and sale fee title. Taxes refunded for the 1974-75 tax roll should be reinstated on the 1975-76 tax roll and the 1975-76 taxes reinstated on the 1975-76 tax roll, in the following amounts. 1974-75 1975-76 Reinstated Reinstated Parcel Tax Amount Parcel Tax Amount 159-100-003 $438.67 159-100-003 $1,014.40 159-100-004 696.53 159-100-004 1,610.70 Assessee has been notified of this correction. PASSED on DEC 16 1975 by unanimous vale of the Supervisors present (BOARD ORDER CORRECTING ERROINEOILS ASSESSPM:T) County Auditor 1 County Assessor 1 County Tax Collector 2 (Redemption) CERTIFIED COPY (Secured) I eertity that this is a full. true & correct co ho atiF^zt i''"':s�^t' is on fit,- fa Mr o[jcOf , J:, w•!,:z.^�I b:, thy ile-rd of ..-,.�• .M_... .•=,'.t C*r.at:. Ca►ftornia. r.•. Cleric K es�:..i .� of�.zid it. Su • County Dy D��uty Geri Derrbors ors �t��gr� i 0U359 . r . L` In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , i9 75 In the Matter of Initiative Petition to Curtail Construction of Proposed County Jail. Mr. L. K. Underwood, Deputy County Clerk, having this day certified that the initiative petition to curtail all further activity on the current proposed jail to be built in Martinez and to require future detention facilities to conform to specified national guidelines,together with supplemental sections of said petition, contain sufficient valid signatures to qualify. IT IS ORDERED that the County Counsel, the County Administrator, and the Registrar of Voters are requested to advise the Board as to available options. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. i hereby certify that the famoc ns b a true and corned copy of an order entered on the mitnutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesoid. cc: County Counsel Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisc" Registrar of Voters , this 16th day of December 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B ��1 Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufe. H24 BPS IoM oQC)sa In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Nominating Members to the Aviation Liaison Committee. Supervisor W. N. Boggess having noted that the terms of four members of the Contra Costa County Aviation Liaison Committee will expire on December 31, 1975 and having recommended that the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) be authorized to contact the four individuals to deter— mine if they are seeking reappointment; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having indicated that some confusion apparently exists with respect to the procedure being used in nominating committee members, calling attention to the fact that the bylaws which set forth the method for appointing members were adopted by the Liaison Committee January 18, 1972 and approved by this Board. March 14, 1972, and having suggested that the Government Operations Committee review this matter; The Board members being in agreement therewith, IT IS SO ORDERED, PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the for*W** is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Public Works Director supervisors Airport Manager a�ixad tWn abth day of December . 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk -By Deputy Clerk Ronda4nn Shadkles EL24APS 'QU UU3�1 i w • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 1975 In the Matter of Nominees to Fill Vacancies on Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board. A December 5, 1975 letter having been received From The Reverend Palmer Watson, Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that said Board has completed a county— :aide solicitation for candidates to fill Five vacancies on the Plental Health Advisory Board, and submitting recommendations For appointment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said recommendations are REFERRED to the Hunan Resources Committee (Supervisors J. F. 1ioriarty and A. M. Dias. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: The Reverend Palmer Watson Witnen '"y hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee Supers Director, Human affixed this 16th day of December . 19 75 Resources Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BylCfll�:..J� f� � _�,�r_�/ Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall OO?S2 H ti 8/75 IOU CO:;TRA COSTA COUNITY MEDICAL SERVICE-5 COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH ��RYICES ADVISORY BOARD 2500 ALHAMBRA AVF-%U- MAR'nN�.GAUFrOMIA 94553 RECEIVED December 5, 1975 %7�1 4 1nnae - I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: The -Reverend Palmer Batson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee supervisors Director, Human affixed this__Ifith day of necernber . 19 11 Resources Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey_ lC_111 e:.�JG j4Cd—k �/� Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00352 "I,-% 8"s IOTA CO.'.TRA COSTA COW,11TY MEDICAL SERVICES COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH 602C.R ICES ADVISORY BOARD 2500 ALHAMaRA AVENUE MARTlN�'',CALIFORNIA 94333 _ RECEIVED December 5, 1975 DEC 8 1975 __. ELUS �.�o- `• ;K.'^.D. Board of Supervisors =Co..•.D. 651 Pine Street J. R. OF SU e v:�c=�iZtE `wCalifornia _ uFRK � D OF SUPERVISORS _, VILLER ',SrLlile2, 94553 T Ta C _w C== Z.M.D. J-;-VES E.%1=ZOARTY� Gentlemen: ...:?iL•:..'_- :Litt:.1,R.N. L,-RPY g-_N:.RT,M.D. :)s- Y_-_::sect,a1.a. e dental Health Advisory Board has completed its selection process _L1E LV_L %#SC11,P.N.N. to find the best qualified candidates for the five vacancies on the =CLT V__ASStSI'ANCE; Mental Health Advisory Board. As you k-ww, there are two vacancies VAT t:tLIce.M.S.W. in the "Physician'' category and three in the "Public Representative" category. After receiving pe=_issioa from your Board, through ,Iir. Van ?.tarter, on September 26, 1975, ee undertook a county-wide solicitation for candidates. In addition to county-wide neispaper articles, letters were written to over twenty-five groups and fifty-four individuals, asIdng them to either consider being a candidate, or to nominate someone they felt uould qualify. By the extended deadline of October 17, 1975, twenty-one affirmative responses were received; four phtysicians and 17 citizens. Several applicants did not qualify as they fell under other categories than the tAm which had op-rings. Interview-s were conducted by the Y . ting Cmanittee. Many factors :-mere given careful consideration, including racial and ethnic repre- sentation, geograp t,ic high risk areas, utich we identified as Supervisorial Districts 1, 2 and 5, supervisorial district distri- bution, eDerience and/or comitment to uorkirg with the poor and undersenred population, and willingness to give a substantial amount of tine to Advisor.- Board work. Farm those intenriew–ed, the Nominating Committee presented the foll.ot%d g slate, u'..dch has accepted by the Mental Health Advisory Board: "Phi,sician" Supervisorial District rnette I:yie-Vega, MLD., Psychiatrist l Kent Sack, M.D., Pe!iatr ician 2 ($5) "Public Representati:-e°` Supervisorial. District Rudi Rodrigue_ d (&5) Larry Gonzales 1 Caroi Hall 2 00353 Microfilmed wifh board order Iw sdd ti t,zee persons were nc=tm_ed at the itIental Health Advisory Board reet= . Me first tt,'c perscs rad' been considered in the final selection. nocess, the third had not as we did no: receive the letter of interest until ia_e N'bv .ber. Zhese noe+inees are: "Physician" Supervisorial District Ste-he I=-isler, M:D., Psychiatrist 3 '?:blic Re7resertativel' Supervisorial District jL-:e Skaar 4 Do--othy Miller 4 All are fine candidates. '!itionally,, we unuld like to request permission to maintain a file of the re=a:nIer of the candidates for consid-eration for future vacancies as there :�-e_e =any highly qualified applicants. ::e ,coed he happy to share with you any =-=then details regarding the quali- :icatio.-is of the noninees. ie great_y appreciate the opportunity you have ;i.en :is to assist in the selection of c.=:-Ldidates. Si Ree. Palmer Watson Cnain.mn P%. :ja cc: Board of Supervisors (b) C. L. Var. 1Iarter. -kr*,h= Will George Deman, M.D. C. H. Pollack, :I.D. Atte Kyle-Mega, M.D. int Sack, M.D. Stephen Heisler, M.D. Rath -Rodriguez iarr1 Gonzales Caro- Hall .;:r:e Spar Doro by Mer Pt Filict 00364 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 019 75 In the Matter of Request for Cost—of—Living Increase for Retired County Employees. Kr. William K. Taylor, President, Contra Costa County Retired Employees Association Chapter, having appeared and requested that the Board take affirmative steps to assure that the County retired employees receive at least a 5 percent yearly cost-of-living increase; and - Tyr. Taylor having suggested that this request be referred to an appropriare Hoard committee for review; and Board members having discussed the matter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of the Retired Employees Association is referred to the 1976 Government Operations Committee, County Administrator and County Counsel. PASSED by the Hoard on December 16, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seo{ of the Board of cc: Committee Members Supervisors County Administrator axed this -rof Deceriber 19 75 County Cour_sei r--�, J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Personnel C`. k3y, 1-.c f ePuty Clerk Ron,-',alynn Shack s 00,65 H 24 SPS IOUY i Contra Costa CouR- tired EmploYees Association Chapter 2719 wt!IJ►MaRA AVENUE MARTINEZ.CAUfO*MIA 91533FTCEIVED yl�romlfP� 1Q179 i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct minutes of said Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid �� of °^ order entered on the cc: CO.- ;ittee i�ie ,.vers Wiitn, my hand and the Seal of the Board of Counter Adr�inistra;or Supervisors Count} Cou_nSC.I affirmed this Ferson^el ---�---day of ; Lzen i�et- 19 717 'I' R• OLSSpN, Clerk Clerk . J..0 1i 24 a/7s IOU J � ry f Contra CostaCouR. 1 Retired Employees Association Chapter P.d.BOX 222 - 2739 ALHAMURA AVENUE - PHONE 2=-Ifo MARTINEZ-CALIFORNIA U.U3 December 1975 RECEIVED Board of Supervisors DEC/4 1975 Contra Costa County Administration Building L . OcssoN sure RS ASartinez, California 94S53 e Cos I,r. Chairman and Members of the Board of Supervisors: I am appearing here today in order to discuss the problems of the retired County employees zdth the Board of Supervisors, to thank the Board of Supervisors for i4hat they were able to achieve in cooperation with the Retirement Board and other interested groups last year, as well as to urge the Board of Supervisors to take affirmative-steps to assure that all County retired employees receive next year at least a S% cost-of-living increase. I would lilac to bring to the Board's attention the fact that according to the Government Code Section 31870.2 of Article 15.S the Board of Supervisors is man- dated to pay a 5% cost-of-living increase for all County retired employees instead of 3%. This law went into effect last year as an emergency measure. I believe it is important that the Board be reminded of what occurred this last year. To begin with, our Retired Employees Association working with the Retire- ment Board teas able to establish a committee arrangement which met with a cont- mittee of the Board of Supervisors in order to deal with some of the problems of the retired employees. The two committees met and agreed because of the un- distributed reserve level of the County Retirement System to pay for the additional cost-of-living increase to assure at least a 51 increase for all County retired em- ployees. The Board paid part of the 3% cost of living. Furthermore, the two committees representing the Board of Supervisors and the Retirement Board agreed further that the one-year-highest-salary formula would be granted to all those re- tired employees who had retired prior to that formula going into effect, which was a substantial improvement for those employees uiw had retired under the old formula of the highest three years average salary increase. This improved me-year-highest- salary retirement formula, however, eras paid out of the undistributed reserve of the Retirement System. The Board also agreed to approve the inclusion after the proper vote of the permanent part-time employees involved. Our Contra Costa County Retired Employees Chapter is talking the position here to- day before the Board of Supervisors that it is possibly the legal obligation and certainly the moral obligation on the part of the Board of Supervisors to guaran- tee that at least the 5% cost of living drill be granted from now on out to all ' retired County employees. The additional cost to the Board of Supervisors ivuld only amount to .05281 per $100 assessed valuation on the tax rate in addition to what the Board now is obligated for their share of the cost-of-living increase to Te- tired enployees. I might point out to the Board of Supervisors that this is still a mir_nal effort on the part of the Board of Supervisors coupared to the basic plan of the Federal Government, which guarantees the total actual cost-of-living increase to all retired employees of the Federal Government. Microfilmed vAth hoard -:ier Microfilmed with board ^-:ter Page 2 For instance, it should be pointed out to the Board of Supervisors that the cost of living has risen since 1972 by 24.6%. Since April 1 of 1972 the cost-of-living increase for retired County employees amounts to only 11%, or an actual loss in terms of purchasing power c— -)ur retired Alar of 13.6%. In discussing with the Con- sumer Price Index oft, als in San Francisco the projection for this year's cost- of-living increase, it ranges anywhere from 10% to 12% in their estimation. There- fore I do not believe it at all out of line for the retired employees of Contra Costa County to request that this Board of Supervisors at least underwrite this ravaging inflation impact on its retired employees by guaranteeing at least a S% cost-of-living increase to us. I believe it is very important that this Board of Supervisors have some understandiiig of what the actual economic status of the average retired County employee is at this point. It is estimated by authoritative sources that the actual average monthly re- tirement income of general County employees is $356.61, or $350.02 without the 2% supplement. This average should be compared u-ith the loci, austere budget projected by the Federal Government for thv married adults in the Bay Area, age 60 and over, which is $553.46, and for a agate budget for two married adults w[kich is $839.46, and as the Board can ►.•ell see, your average retired County employee is substantially below uiiat the Federal Govenuent projects as a low, austere living budget for people in the Bay Area -- let alone comparing it to a moderate living budget. I an sure that this Board of Supervisors could not be prepared today to give any definitive response to my presentation; hoiwever, I :,could hope that this Board was concerned enough about the plight of the retired County employee that they would refer my request to an appropriate committee and that such committee would hold Bearings on our request idiere I and other retired members of the County could appear in order to further substantiate the need for this request. Thank you for your consideration. CtIVM COSTA ()OUMT RETIRED FFIDY'EFS !LSSOCUTION CHAPTER William K. "Slim" Taylor Preside,t opeu/29/afl-cio r 0407 Mi M� i:� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19' In the Matter of Letter re Environmental Impact of Proposed Dow Chemical Company Plant. The Board having received a letter dated November 28, 1975 from Ms. Donna Martindale, 932 Nebraska Street, Vallejo, California 94590, commenting on the environmental impact of the proposed Dow Chemical Company plant to be located in Solana and Contra Costa Counties; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid letter is REFERRED to the Director of Planning to answer. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. I herby certify that the forepainp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Wiitnew my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ms. Donna Martindale Supervisor Public Works Director affixed this 16th dal, of December . 19 M Environmental ControlJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Officer ✓� f / County Administrator -y" Deputy Clerk 91 Maxine M. Neufeld 004358 H 24 a/7s IOM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Decenber 16 ' 19 75 In the Matter of Proposed Employee Group Disability insurance Program. A 'lovember 39, 1975 letter having been received from 'CJs. Gladys $1. 'Hotta, 523 Mine Hill Way, 'Martinez, California 94553, commenting on the cancellation of an employee group disability insurance program, and requesting that the Board approve a State Disability Insurance program for County employees ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Director of Personnel . PASSED by the Board on December 15 , 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregakV Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Seal of the Board of c C: Ms. Gladys A. 310 t to Witness my hand and the Director of Personnel Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 15 to dayof Dec�ra�er, iq 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ,l 1C—1111,f 4'10_ 11 Deputy Clerk ?6�bie 1sAierr 40?S9 H 24 eq5 IOM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Californias December 15 , 19 75 In the Matter of Acquisition of Property for County Service area R-8, Walnut Creek Area. The Board having received a 9ecember 4, 1975 letter from the Citizens Advisory Committee for County Service Area R-8, Walnut Creep area, advising that it is the recommendation of the committee that 413,001 in Park Dedication Trust Funds be utilized for the purpose of acquiring property located on Shell Ridge; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda- tion is REFERRED to the Park and Recreation Facilities Advisory Committee. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesoid. cc: Citizens Advisory Commi tte� MPdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Service Area ^-S mon City of Walnut Creek affixed this 16th day of December, 19 75 Public storks Director � J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Attn: Mr. J. -ears Director o f Planning By--� ~�•� -° /" Deputy Clerk County Counsel Robbie '3u- ierrez County Auditor-Controller County Administrator H 24 a/75 101A 09 lI 10 h In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 1915 In the Matter of Flexibility in Use of Federal Gas Tax Revenues, HR 9544. The Board having received a December 2, 1975 letter from the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors urging support for enactment of federal legislation (HR 9544) which would provide flexibility in the use of federal gas tax revenues by permitting exploration of different transportation alternatives; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is RE.-PERRED to the Public Works Director for report. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public . orrs Director Witness my hand and the Sea{ of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 16th day of De_ gM Pr . 19 _a J. R/.. OLSSON, Clerk By. l�_�P.C�Fy G �i✓t.�l. f" , Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00371 H 24 8"s low INEMM G l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request for Ground Lease at Buchanan Field. The Board having received a December 9, 1975 letter from Mr. W. L. Myers on behalf of California-National Air Services Inc. stating that it desires to negotiate with county representatives for a ground lease for approximately 160,000 square feet at Buchanan Field for the purpose of erecting a maintenance hangar; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Public Works Director for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. cc: California-National Air Witetess my hand and the Seal of the Board of Services Inc. , Supervisors P. 0. Box 567 affixed this 16th day of December, 19 75 El Cerrito, California 94530 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Attn: Air. W. L. Myers Public Works Director By Deputy Cleric Airport Manager NIrg7aham. County Counsel County Administrator 00312 H24 SPP 10M ty v - 8/75 IOM 4 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County State of California December 16 , 19 M In the Matter of Prop"" Housing Rehabilitation and Code Enforcement Program. The Board on October , 1975 raving referred to its Govat ent Operations Committee(Suoervisors A. K. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) and the County Administrator for review, the re t ation of the Contra Costa County Coli ity Develoymnt Advisory Council on a proposed Rousing Rehabilitation Grant Program for the Year 1975-1976; and The Committee having completed its study of the matter and recommended that the County Adniniatrator report on the cedural aspects of implementing the proposal so that the might further consider sweet and Supervisor W. No Boggess having advised that he has received a fu thur communication from torr. Nick Rodriquez# Chair.-an of the Community Development Advisory Councils advising of the Councils recommendation that the Housing Rehabilitation and Code Enforcement Program be undertaken initially in two target areas located in North Richmond and [feat Pittaburg, respectively; and IT IS BY THE BOARD OR3I"= that said recommendation Is also REFERRED to the County Administratore PASSED by the Hoard on Deeeaber 16, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. sat Mr. Nick Rodriques Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator � pervisors Director of Planning affixedisth 16th day of December . 19 75 Acting Building Inspector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk D Agency [u mn Resources �_ � Deputy Clerk Scon�mic Opportunity Vandal Shackles Program Director a 3'73 H 24 8(75 10M •i V 3T 3S A , atnd �° ' R F7 to tth BCAU �, , t p � by the0'�tg A taro tx t ja►a �d on Decal. 16# 1973. aarti turneries that tile of said Board of prs�° Qoinli13a tree and act lir. 'Wielt Ro ri on the datr ofor ald.corr` °°PY of on order �od on the DirecCounttor of Mtor Supe, my f,�d ood fh.Sia/ Act of the Board of D�; � tile3 q� �Pector �W d'u 26-�—� o f As rJec �cT � Reaores �, J. A ember 19 75 �0' PQe'to3t�r _ �L�?N. Clerk �'e,�,ox. ad,*2 � Sha � peperty Clark "24 d/TS IOM 73 r ; • f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL PQ am su PHONE ammewsS INNNUM 372-2035re •'"', "'� T. , ,. December S. 197S � Warren N. Boggess, Chairman Board of Supervisors Administration Building """""" !Martinez, California 94553 Chairman Boggess: The approved Community Development Block Grant Application for the first year contained a Housing Rehabilitation and Code Enforcement Program for the unincorporated portions of the County. On October 10, 1975 the CD Advisory Council submitted to you its recom- mendations relating to the policies for the Rehabilitation Program, which submission was referred by you to the Government Operations Committee. At its meeting of December 3, 1975 the Advisory Council authorized me to submit to you its recommendation that the Housing Rehabilitation and Code Enforcement Program be undertaken initially (in the first CD year) in two Target Areas located in \orth Richmond and West Pittsburg respectively. Maps showing the location of the Target Areas are attached. The Target Areas were developed under the direction of the Housing Sub- committee of the Council and with full participation by members of the Council and also the County's Planning Department and Building Inspection Department staff. The areas are based on Council field trips and inspec- tion, and on staff surveys and analyses. We would appreciate reference of the Target Area to the Government Opera- tions Committee, so that it may complete its consideration of the Housing Rehabilitation Program at its earliest convenience. Sincerely yours, VERDE ; SCHOOL .t C `..-••� N � t.. ar,: --x•....ax��,. t- � 1...,..-*�.t, .�`�� r---^"= it " Q r.w• -Tr-�...i �„ ►vE ill {': ♦ r�,� w iv.� ,,,.. .X.��'�"���...�j ry' a MAX i Y. ��.. v..+X i-i-..7 � " i,�-,.'..•._al t�„�_ ���-ice" Y TM ,•- RHEEM Li MFG co _ _ •Z ! •-•-r�•w�.r'r.�� _ "I$Ltr AVE �a 1 x�� i• •.f _�L_._t_.sa.i-=sass'E—� j'_'_'L..."! , `~i � 1w r CERTatri- „ �� .. T" '".-. t•C-- r.--� _`r TEED ,,� L.��1u ..._..r .--t .3.••z:_ jt.�_j.:�. �.7��._[..ai:�'��i•a- � :�•.+ t PRODUCTS •t S: 1.x.�T, (�'T 11 j7 10 Contra Costs County Code Enforcement/Eiousing Rehabilitation Program RECO IEN'DED TARGET AR&I-NORTEI RICH.M.N$D STUDY AREA BUUNDAR1 r am _...� .TARGET AREA B011itiilAr'Y L...........+� 1 i3 1975-76 009j V , ��Q+1�,���yi.�w�._._—t {._._:.t.. �,,,•-- #} �.. _ _ Std. �._—,—,.•.� — FJ Nff �' - -�r .•.. w_r V r.:±'_'�or_ ....L_. Le . • -fir SHELL 7-7 1 TRACT y. rr�-.r = . an ' r-.''`„h}"� J`.tr t► '' � = 'tom• u f~ ..,y•..P f.. �_�W• iw J ii �� `;rte--JY'i ���"�_±er r -t�.4 i ( •• ♦w f s • .'l.t:+ � f BELL «IPS �- �! f ^+�. . +Y i rr. �•.�J r, Tr: SCHOOL `+�'_ :�"t�- � t w _~' ' t•a I t ;� 3 :�y h_ 1 .I+ Y4�4.��.:t.� .� `„'``ti. ��.�« i 'int� i r •... r.)tp, RA COSTA CAKAi STAT[ lotfoar • r•' L� . a•' ATi!3ROSE pARw ' Kc fi V it`1r7OSSTRiCT Contra Costa County Code Enforceacnt/flousing Rehabilitation Program RECO'rtEtiDED TARGET AREA-NEST PITTSBURG STUDY AREA BOUNDARY �.."wow N...M7 TARGET AREA BOUNQ%RI' 0 0 J-3 t 6 2975-76 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r December 16 , i9 75 In the Matter of Report to State Legislature as required by Penal Code Section 4029. The County Sheriff-Coroner having advised the Board that Penal Code Section 4029(d) requires each county to report to the State Legislature by January 1, 1976 on its ability to comply by January 1, 1979 with requirements of Subsections (a), (b) and (c) of the aforesaid Penal Code Section 4429, pertaining to equal availability of facilities, programs, services and privileges to male and female inmates; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator and the County Sheriff-Coroner are DIRECTED to prepare a report for submittal by the Chairman of this Board to the State Legislature, as required. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator Witrim my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff-Coroner Super'viso'r: County Counsel affixed this 16th _day of December , 19 M J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Cleric Maxine M. Neufeld 00177 #424 aRs 106A win Milo In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California I hereby certify that the foreBoinp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors County Counsel affixed this 16th _day of December 19 ya B J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufe d H 24 8/75 IOU 00377 . -___�_ ........ � w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 1975- In 975—In the Matter of Legal Services for School Districts. The Board having received a December 4, 1975 letter from Mr. James L. Merrihew, Superintendent, Mt. Diablo Unified School District, requesting that improved legal services be provided to school districts by County Counsel; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFF MM to the Administration and Finance Committee (Super- visors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Kenny), County Administrator and County Counsel. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby awtify that the forepobp is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. James L. Merrihew Witness,my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee Supervisors County Administrator affixed this lfith _day of DenzM zr , 19 M County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By t` 1r ��.1 C, � Lt�Lrf,6s . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall H 24 8/75 lOM OQ�' 8 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Report of Human Resources Committee with Respect to Distribution of Food Vouchers tinder Women , Infants and Children rlutri ti on Program. The Board raving heretofore referred to its Human Resources Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and A. 1. Dias) the matter of submittal of a Letter of Intent to the State Department of Health with respect to distribution of food vouchers under the Women. Infants and Children Nutrition Program (WIC) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended that the Board authorize the girector, liuman Resources Agency to negotiate a contract with the Richmond Welfare Rights Organi- zation for continued distribution of WIC vouchers under certain conditions ; and The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recommendation to be appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation of its Yuman Resources Committee is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on 7ecember 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board Commi ttee Supervisors Director, Human Resources affixed this 15th day of Decenber, 19 75 Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County ,administrator By, ��� /, �r �/a�,,; ,�' DeputyClerk Robbie Gdtjlerrez j H 24 6"s IOM 4 � ` 1 I I I JAMES P.KENNY.RICHMOND THE BOARD OF SUp IST clammr ERYISORS ALFRED M.DIAS.SwN�Iyyp CONTRA COSTA WARREN N.BOGGESS 2ND DISTRICT COr NTN CHAIRMAN JAMES E,MORIARTY.Lwf<wYt71; �jY JAMES P. KENNY ARD 0I5TA1Cr ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 10.3 JAMj,S VICE:CHAIRMAN WARREN N.BOGGESS,coNCOIM +rN DISTRICT AND[x—Fl-0 WN, COUNTY CLERICP.O. BOX 811 CLERIC 0/TNt•OARD EDMUND A. LINSCI{EID, VM,581146 MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 MRS GERALDINE RUSSELL. CHitf CLERK PHONE 220.3000 ExTZ"%1ON 2171 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and co.. • , , - minutes of said Board of Supervisor an the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: hoard commi ttee Superv`sor } Decen,er 19 75 Director, Humaffixed Human Resources this 1 _daY °f J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Agency �'-- county Administrator B Y , Deputy Clerk �oFia Gutilierrezj) N 24 8J75 IOW THE 130ARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P.KENNY.RICMMONO WARREN N.BOGGESS IST DISTRICT �''e CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.DIAS.s&m r&s p CONS COSTA COUNTY JAMES P. KENNY 2ND DISTRICT` VICC CHAIRMAN JAMES E MORTY.WAY[TZC ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 103 .LAMES R-OL N.COUNTY CtiRK ARD DISTRICT Q AND[X OFFICIO CLSRK OF THC SOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORD P.O. BOX 911 MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 CHt�CL"K EDMVNO PHONE 228.3000 A. LtNSCHEtO. ►ITrssuRo 37N1M DISTRICT CXT[MSION 2371 December 16, 1975 REPORT OF HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE ON WOMEN, INFANTS AND CHILDREN NUTRITION PROGRAM On December 9, 1975 the Board of Supervisors referred to our Committee for review and report the matter of the County contracting with the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization for distribution of food vouchers under the Women, Infants and Children Nutrition Program (WIC) . The County Health Department currently distributes WIC food vouchers to eligible persons throughout the County. The Richmond Welfare Rights Organization through a subcontract with the Children's Hospital of Oakland has been distributing WIC vouchers to certain eligible persors in the Richmond area. The Children's Hospital of Oakland has recently decided to withdraw from participation in the WIC program. The WIC program regulations require that distributors of WIC vouchers be associated with a medical health facility. The State of California, Department of Health has requested that the County subcontract with the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization for continued distribution of WIC vouchers to the WRO clientele. After having reviewed this matter, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the appropriate County staff to negotiate a contract with the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization for continued distribution of WIC vouchers under the following conditions: 1. The contract between the County and the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization wiles provide that the County will not be held liable for the operation or accountability of the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization. 00350 2. 2. The State Department of Health must increase its allocation of WIC funds to the County by a sufficient amount to cover the voucher distribution administrative costs of the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization. It is the intent of the foregoing recommendations that the continuation of the distribution of WIC food vouchers by the Richmond Welfare Rights Organization will not result in any liability exposure or result in any additional County costs. J. E. MORIARTY -A. M. DIAS Supervisor, District III Supervisor, District II OtJ��1 .41 ._ r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California lecember 16 , 19 71; In the Matter of Appeal of Ir. James Halverson from Action of the Planning Commission in Connection with Subdivision 4610 , Danville .Area. The Board havinn heretofore fixed this date for decision on the appeal of Ar. James G. Halverson from the condition imposed by the Planning Commission that the final map for Subdivision 4610, Danville area , shall not be approved until agreement is reached bet4een the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and the developer with regard to the district's policy on the availability of schools ; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having advised that he had not had time to review the appeal , and requested that the deci- sion be deferred to December 23, 1375 at 11 :10 a.m. ; IT IS BY THE ROARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: lir. 1. u. Halverson Witness,my hand and the Seal of the Board of San Ramon Valley Unified Supervisors School district affixed this 16th day of 0ecember , 19 75 Director of Pl anni nq J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk a,bie tierr z ",2. an5 ]LOU 00152 H 23 8/75 10M F In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Slec�abPr 1 . 19 in the Matter of Report on Review of Unsentenced Population, Contra Costa County Jail. The Board having received a letter from Mr. Harry D. Ramsay, County Sheriff-Coroner, in response to a November 24, 1975 Board referral with respect to the inauiry of Ms. Karen Lehman, Coordinator, Contra Costa County Chapter ofNational Organization for Women, concerning reasons for which mates are being held in the County Jail; and Mr. Ramsay having furnished this Board with informa— tion obtained by the State Board of Corrections follovring an unannounced survey on April 16, 1975 of the unsentenced prisoner population in the Contra Costa County and Branch Jails, which survey indicated that of the total 130 unsentenced prisoners only 3 were eligible for release; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDS W that receipt of the afore- said report is ACKNOWLEDGED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that copies of the report be furnished to his. Lehman and others who have expressed concern on this issue. PASSED by the Board on December 169 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. i cc: Ms. Karen Lehman Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Sheriff—Coroner Supervisors County Counsel affixed thin lfth_day of19 M County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk $y � �21R.ttLtYll , Deputy Clerk I Helen C. Marshall i 1 s H.3 8"'s 10At 00 S3 n G4 K_4 sns �o� V" J, .J � tl res SHERIFF-CORONER CONTRA i a COSTA COUNTY O ` P.O. BOX 391 MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 _ ��Cpm►� HARRY D. RAMSAY N. e. Has iNCRIFF-GORONt14 nssisT�usr sHann L.A.CLiMM Ac"M•[AYtGas cv/ RECEIVED December 1, 2976 1975 oE 4 J. IL OLSSON CITRIC (CARO OF SUPERVWN Kcgar to. Supervisor Warren Boggess, Chairman Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Re: Board Order of 11-24-75 Requesting Report on Reasons for Inmates Being Held in County Jail Dear Chairman Boggess and P+.enb of the Board: Attached is a copy of a June 27, 1975 memorandum by Mr. Edgar A. Snaith, Field Representative, State Board of Corrections. We suggest that this jail census report be transmitted to Ms. Karen Lehman, Coordinator, Contra Costa County Chapter, National Organization for Women, in response to her inquiry dated 11-13-75. Very truly yours. D. r SAY, She ff r Attachment HDR:UM L-rz� �, Olen AN EQUAL. OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER k State of Caliiornia r '- HEALTH AM WELFARE AGENCY 70: Howard D. Sutliff Date: June 27, 1975 Executive Officer File N0.: Subject: Review of Unsentenced 4/XU Population--Contra- 1 Costa County Jail Board ' From: -Department of Corredions, Sacramento 95814 As you know, there has been considerable local controversy over the construction of the proposed Contra Costa County Jail. A part of the controversy includes the belief of some citizens that the jail is unnecessarily holding minor offenders pending their appearance in court. The Sheriff and his staff maintain that they are using all possible means to reduce the pre-trial population. On a number of occasions we have been asked for information on the detention practices of the County. The only information available to us has been the rate of incarceration per 10,000 population, wnich is a very gross measure based upon a one day count of the number of persons in detention in each county. In order to obtain a more accurate assessment of detention practices, we made an unannounced survey of the unsentenced prisoner popu- lation in the Contra Costa County Jail and Branch Jail on Wednesday, April 16, 1975. - As- indicated on the attached, there was a total of 130 unsen- tenced prisoners'at the rain and Branch Jails. Of the total, only three were eligible for release by the jail staff. Two of the three had been reviewed for release under P.C. 853.6 and were found to be ineligible. One case was pending review and was probably going to be released on his promise to appear. I believe the results confirm the SI:eriff`s contention that all possible means are being used to reduce pre-trial detention. EDGAR A. SHITH Field Representative F.AS:plg Attachment cc: Sheriff Harry D. Ramsay bcc: Arthur Will, County Administrative Officer Captain Holthus 00?S5 Microfilmed with board order f i Fj f _ i b4rvey Unsentenced Prisoner Population Contra Costa County April 16, 1975 1. Total population surveyed. Main Jail 109 Branch Jail 21 Total 130 2. Total population with HOLDS from other agencies or remanded to the Sheriff from a court: State Parole Violation Holds (CDC & YA) 22 Violation. of Probation 15 Warrants 24 On remand from a court* 16 Total 77 *Typically these are persons received from a city police department via lower court. 3. Persons charged with felonies (not included in #2 above) . Murder 8 Kidnapping 3 Rape 1 Perversion w/force 1 Lewd act upon a child 1 Robbery 7 Burglary 9 Receiving stolen property 1 Battery against Peace Officer 1 Assault w/weapon 4 Possession of narcotics 3 Forgery 2 Possession of check w/intent to defraud 1 Perjury l Grand Theft 6 Theft of vehicle 1 Total 50 4. Persons charged with misdemeanors: • Charlie Days in Jail Case A Battery (Citizens Arrest) 1 Case B Violation of Promise to Appear 0 Case C Battery, resisting arrest 2 5. Summar► Persons with Holds 77 Charged with felonies 50 Charged with misdemeanors _3 Total population surveyed 130 Microfilmed w0h board order 001 M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 7�- In the Matter of Accepting Deed for Development Rights in connection with L.U.P. 2055-74, Danville area. Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that Dr. Charles E. Ward was granted Land Use Permit 2055-74 for the establishment of medical offices at the north- westerly corner of El Cerro Boulevard and El Pintado, Danville area, subject to the condition (Number 11) that development rights of the area of the subject parcel not used for building; parking or driveway, be deeded to the County; and As recommended by Mr. Dehaesus IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the deed executed by Dr. Ward is ACCEPTED. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby ceriNy that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Dr. Charles E. Ward Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors Public Works Director �,� this 16th day of December , 19 75 County Counsel County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk via Planning Department /. Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neuf ld H 24 a,ns IOU 0,s?..? I DEED OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHT hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", hereby grants to the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee", a negative easement in gross, of development rights over, on and under the real property located in an unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, California, hereinafter referred to as "the property", described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to not construct or cause to be constructed on the property or any part thereof, any work of improvement as now defined by California Civil Code §3106, or as it may be amended or replaced from time to time hereafter, except such works of improvement on the building site, driveway, landscape, labeled A and B are together�� or parking area, which areas it outlined in red on the lot map, with descriptions thereof, which is Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, without prior written approval of Grantee. Grantee shall not make any charges for fees, or expenses for giving its approval or disapproval. To obtain the required approval of Grantee, Grantor or its successors in interest shall present to the officer or agency of grantee authorized to accept application for changes in land use, or such other officer or agency as Grantee shall designate in writing from time to time, such maps, drawings and other documents as are rbasonably required by Grantee to show the nature and extent of the proposed work of improvement in a form similar to that then required by Grantee for obtaining approvals under the zoning ordinances then applicable in the area of the property for the type of improvement proposed. The action of Grantee in approving or disapproving the proposed work of improvement shall be based upon the reasonable standards of good land use applicable to the property being applied by Grantee -1- "s x QU��3 1 '� r at the time of the application. Grantee, in granting approval, l g an y PP J ♦ i shall have the right in good faith to impose reasonable conditions, consistent with the approval,. on any approval granted. Grantee shall notify the party applying for its approval, in writing, of its approval or disapproval, and if Grantee disapproves such notification shall set out the specific reasons for the disapproval. Such notification shall be mailed within thirty (30) days after receipt by Grantee of all documents required for its approval. In the event Grantee fails to give notification in writing within the thirty (30) day period, to the party applying, . of the action taken by Grantee, Grantee shall be deemed to have approved the proposed work of improvement. In the event the party applying submits revised or amended documents to meet specified objections of Grantee, then the same thirty (30) day period shall apply as, to the approval or disapproval of any re-submitted documents. This easement shall be perpetuity, subject to being terminated as to the property or such person thereof as is applicable at the time that work of improvement have been approved by Grantee to be located in the property or a portion thereof, which materially change the original uses of the property or a portion thereof. This easement shall run with the property and shall bind Grantor and any subsequent Grantee of the property or any interest therein or any porton thereof. Dated: /3 , 197f f' STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF -� before me. t r5igned, a Rotary Public in and for said State, personally appeared known to me, to be the person_,_whose name_ bscribed to the within Instrument, and adinowledged to me that—he_executed the same. WIIMM my hand and official seaL - _ M1riME iTY?E4 OR Pi<11TEOJ 1 notary Polk in and for.sald State. ACKNOWIUXUD1T--Leo mt—WOOMM F—2I3--8ts }S& •t..as a+.•o +r[.•[+r sr+ .oae ►wa,ets ccw . I BRYAN MURPHY ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS P-0.8=207.WALNUT CREEK.CA 04597-9233 AUKKE ROAD.wALNUT CSIUX.CA 94396 �a31 p39-4300 AUGUST 15, 1975 JOB NO. 4984-1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIOU FOR DON WOLTERS- DR. WARD PROPERTY A PORTION OF THOSE PARCELS OF LAIID CONVEYED BY PARCEL 1 AtlD PARCEL 2 IN DEED NO. 17520 TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MAY 20, 1960 IN VOLUME 3624, PAGE 2, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ALSO A PORTION OF LOT 19, RANCHO EL RIO (2 M 48) AND A PORTION OF LOT 101 FIRST ADDITION RANCHO EL RIO (4 M 78) , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ' COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED NO. 17519, TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1961 IN VOLUME 3971, PAGE 321, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 410 43' 48" EAST, 212.06 FEET, SOUTH • 480 16' 12" EAST, 147.75 FEET, NORTH 41' 43' 48" EAST, 241.14 FEET AND SOUTH 48' 16' 12" EAST, 138.48 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF EL PINTADO ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 150 18' 43" WEST, 56.48 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 180 FEET FOR A DISTANCE OF 163.86 FEET; THE-NCE SOUTH 36° 50' 42" EAST, 5.59 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 25 FEET A DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH .i L.'... 53" 09' 18" WEST, 222.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61* 11' 00" 4}''��" WEST, 133.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53' 52' 21" WEST, 288.97 FEET TO THE POIfrf OF COMMENCEMENT. CONTAINING 3.166 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. _ zs LAP < i m m, i 1 ri BRYAN Fi MURPHY ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS P.0.sm m.wuxur cmmE .0 s4sg7-e23 ALmmE aoAo.wALxuT cwxit a sasses �43! 030-6300 AUGUST 26, 1975 JOB NO. 4984-1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR DON WOLTERS DR. WARD PROPERTY PARCEL "A" A PORTION OF THOSE PARCELS OF LAND CONVEYED BY PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 2 IN DEED NO. 17520 TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MAY 20, 1960 IN VOLUME 3624, PAGE 2, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ALSO A PORTION OF IAT 19, RANCHO EL RIO ( 2 M 48) AND A PORTION OF LOT 101 FIRST ADDITION RANCHO EL RIO (4 M 78) , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED NO. 17519, TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1961 IN VOLUME 3971, PAGE 321, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, THENCE NORTH 410 43' 48" EAST, 212.06 FEET, SOUTH 48' 16' 12" EAST, 147.75 FEET; THENCE NORTH 410 43' 48" EAST, 48.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LAST COURSE NORTH 41° 43' 48" EAST, 193.14 FEET AND SOUTH 48" 16' -12" EAST, 138.48 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF EL PINTADO ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 150 18' 43" WEST, 56.48 FEETf THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7- 54' 47" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.86 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 820 46' 52" WEST, 213.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.503 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. C3. �+ nt a i i .a 00391 r W46 P 49 BRYAN fi MURPHY ASSOCIATES, INC. CIVIL. ENGINEERS P.0.5=287.WALNUT CMMCA 94597-M=uPIKE ROAD.WALKUT CREEK.CA 94596 i..153 aaa-esoo AUGUST 26, 1975 JOB NO. 4984-1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR DON WOLTERS DR. WARD PROPERTY PARCEL "B" A PORTION OF THOSE PARCELS OF LAND CONVEYED BY PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 2 IN DEED NO. 17520 TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED MAY 20, 1960 IN VOLUME 3624, PAGE 2, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ALSO A PORTION OF LOT 19, RANCHO EL RIO (2 M 48) AND A PORTION OF LOT 101 FIRST ADDITION RANCHO EL RIO (4 M 78) , DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED 210. 17519, TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED OCTOBER 11. 1961 IN VOLUME 3971, PAGE 321, OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 410 43' 48" EAST, 212.06 FEET, SOUTH 48* 16' 12" EAST, 65.64 FEET, SOUTH 24* 44' 48" WEST, 104.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07' 10' 18" EAST, 76.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37' 42' 18" EAST, 34.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 660 00' 39" EAST, 123.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54' 27' 24" EAST, 254.45 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF EL PINTADO ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE SOUTH WHICH CENTER BEARS NORTH 80' 02' 29" EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 180.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 260 53' 11" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 84.47 FEET THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 360 50' 42" EAST, 5.59 FEET; THENCE ALONG A TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 900 AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.27 FEET; -THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUT11 53" 09' 18" WEST, 222.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61° 11' 00" WEST, 133.76 FEET; THENCE NORTH 530 52' 51" WEST, 288.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 1.414 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. _u c. on ter. L : --J • _ 00392 I t . In the Board of Supervisors of -Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of .Administrative Appeal with Respect to Land Use Permit No. 2010-75, Lafayette Area. This being the time fixed for decision on the administra- tive appeal of Mr. Michael M. Levine from actions of the Director of Planning with respect to L.iT:P.-2010-75, Shell Service Station, _ Stanley Boulevard, Lafayette .area; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having advised that he had viewed the subject property at night, that," fn his opinion, the lights' do not comply with the conditions of approval for said per- mit inasmuch as they reflect on adjoininz, properties, and having therefore suggested that staff again investigate the site and attempt to work out an agreement between the property owners and the applicant; and Mr. Gunther Boccius of the Planning Department staff having commented that staff had determined through prior investi- gation that recession of the lights complied with conditions of the land-use permit; and Mr. Heinz Fenichel, Assistant Director of Planning, having suggested that the decision be delayed for three weeks to allow staff to review the situation and determine what further action can,btw:xaken to shield the lights; and The Board members having discussed the matter, and Supervisor Moriarty having recommended that the decision be de- 'erred to January 13, 1976 at 10:55 a.m. to allow staff to meet with. the applicant and Mr. Levine to attempt to arrive at a satis- factory solution; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Moriarty is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and cored copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. M. M. Levine d Director of Planning County Counsel aR>wd this 16th day of December, lq 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz H 240,,wn IOM �► ,. _ { 71 I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 26 . 1975 In the Mailer of Approval of Agreement for Private improvements in Minor Subdivision 99-75, Alamo/Danville Area. •f s WHEREAS an agreement with Laurie Development Company,, P.O.Box 906, Danville, California 91+526, for the installatim and completion of private improvements in Minor Svbdivisim 99-75, Alamo/banville Area, has been presented to this Board; aad WHEREAS said agreement has been secured by a $900.00 Surety Band issued by United Pacific Insurance Company, Bond No. U 896909, for the full amount of the costs for completion of the improvements required by the Board of Adjustment in approving said minor subdivision; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said agreement is APPROVED and the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. gyp) I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Applicant Wd'en my hand and the,Seal of the, Board of Building Inspection Dept. Supervisors Grading Engineer affixed this 16th day of December _ 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY Y!6�L� . Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz H 24 BPS IOU 0039' �ry r. 1:"i!O3 S: '4J7i•1,1O'' 1•11r_or Subdiv sion: (51) Subdivider: LAw gig D W (Private Ir prover_ents) RQ* 602( eOfe 12AnOtHE CA', (91) Effective Date: 12/41-itr (§2) Co=letion Period: ©r.IL- (53) Deposit: (faithful perf. *,ecoazo 1. Parties Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the above- named Subdivider, rutually p,o.:...se "and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: 2. improv_n_nts. Subdivider shall construct, install and con?lete private road and street i.:.oro•.ements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all _=pr ove::.ents as required by the County Ordinance Code, especially Title 9 and including future amendments, and all i.:provements required in the approved parcel map Ir:provement pian of this subdivision on file in the County's Building Inspection Depart-Ment. Subdivider shall complete this cork and irnrover..ents (hereinafter called "cork" within the above completion period from date hereof as required by Section 922-4.80$ of t.%,-.e County Ordinance' Code, in a good work-nanlir_e --a.nner, in accordance with. accepted construction practices and in a r..anner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a con- flict bel.-ween the improve..ent plan and the County- Ordinance Code, the stricter .requirements shall govern. 3. improvement Securit-Y. Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall, in accordance z:ith Section 922-4.604 (3) of the County Ordi- nance Code, deposit as security- with the County at least the above- specified anount, which is the total estimated cost of the work, in the form of a cash deposit., a certified or cashier's check., or an acceptable corporate surety bond, guaranteeing his faithful perfor- nance of this agreement. 4. indernity. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indermitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A - The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, cor.L:.issions, officers, agents and er-ployees; B - he liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any k_nd allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below r and including personal injury, death, property da^ase, inverse condennarion, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or dar.age was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the parcel map improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceeding(s) concerning these; - C - he actions causing, liabilit are-any act or omission (negli- gent or non-negiirenz) in connection with the c_atters covered by this agree^er_t and atwributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontrac- tor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them; D - 2:o.^.-Conditions: he promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether'%or not any Inden_nitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan( s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other inder..nification covering any of these ratters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. 5. Costs. Subdivider shall pay when due all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. b. Nonnerfornance and Costs. If Subdivider fails to conplete the r work aNa w?Lain the tl .e specified in this agreement or extensions granted, County nay proceed to complete them by ccztract -1- 00395 1►J►iCroFitmeCf with board order or otherwise, a.-.d Subdivider shall pay the costs and char es there- for i:::.edia�ely upcn derztnd. If Co:::ty sues to compel per for=ance of this aCreement or rec^ er the cont, of completing the imar e v emAnts. Subdivider shall pay all reasonable a:torneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other eXpenses of litigation i.^.carred by County in connection t1here1:ith. 7. Assi_r__nment. If before these inp_cvements are completed this Elision subdivision is annexed to a cif,, the County may assign to t`:at city the County's rights under this agreement and/or any depcsit or bond securing theca. 8. Warranty. Subdivider .,arrantt that th..e said inprovement clan is adequate to accomplish this r:ork. as promised in Section 2; and if, at any time before the County's acceptance of the irprovem.er_ts as complete, the i^.provenent plan proves to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accompilsh .the work as promised. 9. No Waiver by County. Inspecticn of the work and/or materials, or approval of r:or:_ and/or raterial s inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the reeu r_werts of this a&'reerezt, or acceptance of the thole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or an,: conbinat_o n or all of these acts, sh.alil not- relieve otrelietie the Subdivider of his obli`at=on to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be t^e:e:.y estopped from brim,:rg any action for damages arising frcm the failure to comply with any of the terns and conditions hereof. 10. Record Map. In consideration hereof, County shall accept said parcel reap for f ng with the County Recorder. COUNT .3COS_ SU3rJI`.'ZDRR: (s a note beio•►r) By I W1 . Chairman, Boa of S!• rvisors W. N. Bona,- ATTEST: J. R. OLSS6I3, County Clerk By dLc>iVER� & ex officio Clerk of the Board (Designate official capacity in the business) By - ?cote to Subdivider: (1) Execute Deputy . aesk o►:ledg^ent form below; and (2) If a corporation, attach a Certified copy of (a) the b--laws or (b) the resolution of the Bcard of Directors, aut orizfng execution of this contract and of the bonds required hereby. State of Cdg ifornia ) _JAcknbwlenent by Corperat;on, County of / :•T�; �i_ "'' Partnership or Individual) OnGam^; ,�-�J�,�::�/rte_= .�-�+'���!f%`1 , the person.(s) whose name(s) is/are signcd'above for Subdi:lider and. who is known to me to be the individ- ual and officer or partner as stated above who signed this instru=ent, and acknowledged to ne that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership naned above executed it. [11 TA, IAL SEAL] l -Notary - Public for aid County and State (CCC Std. Forma; Rev. 12/74) MJB:bw -2- .i-A•willdi. 11i ..'•r.f7t1:'1)i"Y:^:•t:1:c1a1a:' " . 0 0 \104Z �;.111111N1{Ul1fl l7;177!!N7i1L3:.....:..:.:.11.•::.. ... j ZTSu.-P,ANCE CO•�P PERFORMANCE BOA1D Bond too. U 896809 T kartnershlV L' iccut��a.ttu..J .,..• es S) is/are Whose naner� 3 rdi via- county °f �' the persor.(s� oto be the who s kro:;n to �" ed th{s In- -a Lru"enor On : u�Asiba,:icer and. �'� A abdve h4 that the eorpo='ztion Si: d above f par as state t and ual and officer or Pne that he executed i •ledEed to e:;ecuted it and zcl:noir varied above pa,rtnershiP001ZV SEpL] l- � a:�ci State [If TA. IAL fry,,;' said .Countf _Nou Public for f ar- t+/� Rev. 12/74) —2— (CCC std. Fy�orza rarti= M-`�'ER T3'NI'T�`,�17 PAC�IC �l�T�T3RANC� CC�11�PA.TTY ; i+avE Or-F.;,. TACOMA. Wl.»SWNGTON Bond No. U 896809 PERFORMANCE BOND PR4SItT1K: $15.00 CALIFORNIA-PUBLIC CONTRACT KNOW ALL MEN BY i NESE PRESEt\q'S: That DORALD LAwM as Principal,and the UNITED PACs MC IN''SURAINCE C0:1-IPANY, a Washington corporation author- ized to execute bonds in the State of California.as Surety,are held and firmly bound unto c0t3ny OF CDNTRA COSTA as..Oblige-,in the sum of EIGHT H[tF.DM AHD AD/I00ths - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars($ 800.00 - - - - - - ) for which sum are bind ourselves.our heirs,executors,administrators.successors and assigns,jointly and severally by these presents THE CO.VDtrlo v of the above obligation is such that, Mereas the Principal has entered into a contract, dated December 3 . 1975 ,azth the Obligee o� to do and perform the following mark t"it MIROR SII93IYISI08 99-75 Now.TnEREmRE, if the said Principal shall w-A and truly perform the work contracted to be performed under said contract. then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect Signed and sealed this 3rd day of DECEMBER . 1975 ._....�.__._.-......_ _�..... fes? UNIT A C T t.CE COINTAW /10 4r ` Attort=e�►•irrFaci Q03�7 A Microfilmed with board order — . 1 ! Microfilmed with board order State of California 1 1 ss: County of ATA1 On 1 33 . 19 75.befare no.the undersigned.a Motary Public in and for said County. f personally appearo . ! $d known to me 1D be the person whose terms is f ' "=and to the within instrument as Attorney-in•Fact of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY,and wAnowkdged to me that_he mA=bW the name of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY.as Surety.aad h is own names: iAttorney-in-Fact. e Y-le, ' My Comnasswn expi...+ "" ��- ice!19i�r • forsm county sou-me Eo.3172 ICAUF.1 U:-'*-:-'! CAL CO\TRA:!-PiSi:� *t .::•3t•A:._� ti-1435 _ SOON '" In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 In the Matter of Support of Legislation to Continue the Emergency Medical Services Act. The Board on December 4s 1975 having received a letter dated November 100 1975 from Charles R. Phillips, M.D., Chairman, Emrgency Medical Care Committee of Contra Costa County, requesting support of federal legislation to continue the Emergency Medical Services Act which expires on June 30, 1976, and further requesting that letters be sent to Senators Alan Cranston and John V. Tunneqq and to Congressmen Ronald V. Dellums, George Miller and Fortney H. Stark; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above request is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Directors Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 16th day of December , ig 75 C es R. Phillips, M.D., — Chairman, Eatergency I R. OLSSON, Clerk Medical Care Committee c � `nA.Deputy Clerk Rondalya Shack es Q0B7a7(7 H 24 4/75 IOU k' I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 19 75 In the Matter of Increasing the Petty Cash Fund of County Service Area R-6 Because of an expanded program and increased activity at the Orinda Community Center, County Service Area R-6, and on the recommendation of the Public Works Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an increase in the petty cash fund from $150 to $500 is authorized for the aforesaid County Service Area. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept: Co. Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this i rth day of ne f--tuber , 19 75 County Auditor-Controller .,J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �^�.< �`2.i Deputy Clerk Yar, Cram, H 24 8/75 10M J - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December lE In the Matter of Fee-for-Service Agreements with Physicians, Dentists, Optometrists and Podiatrists Utilized by the County Medical Services and County Health Department IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that agreements for those fee-for-service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the County Health Department whose names are listed below are hereby APPROVED, implementing Resolution No. 75/844. Name Humber Effective Date Rate Lisa R. Mahoney, H.D. 26-749 November 8, 1975 $19.20 per hour IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to sign the contracts on behalf of this Board. Passed by the Board on tt r"h v- If;-- I C17 5 1 henry certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Orig: Hunan Resources Agency �p Attn: Contracts Unit ervisom cc• County Administrator oftixed thisS Ftja day of r)eePmb r , 19 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County BY 3 Medical Director /7�,c•� -� .r Deputy Clerk p 2'�1 Chief, Medical Administrative Services tu+ , County Health Officer Personnel Services Unit Employee Rel3cions Officer all's ioM r r.:4 SfJS 10%A is AGREMNENT FOR r:.01FESSIONAL SERVICES CooLract Paid Physicians (Contra Costa County Human resources Agency) Number 26- 749 1. Partin:;. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually a;ree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. a. Contr.:ctor (name) Lisa R. Mahoney, H.D. (address) 1915 Green Street, Apt. 106, San Francisco, CA 94123 Phone 922-8951 l•• � � :att:.r'l�.ti�� ��2}.i��..�. � � ♦Jy mil�.._�.J.. � � ( ) Physician/Resident ( ) Dentist ( ) Optometrist ( ) Orthodontist ( ) c. Effective Date November 8, 19T5 d. Method of Payment (Board Resolution No. 75/344 ). Check appropriate bort: IX] Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. Rate: $ 19.20 per hour . [ j Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. Rate: $ per month. ivl aer�ix+ reudexea as requested, ane: schedules and approved by Cuuncy. in addition to those norrally and additionally scheduled and required as specified in 4. Services, County will pay Contractor $ per hour in addition to monthly rate. e. Anesthesia heiia Se=vicns: C,-:%n r ctar .-r es to perform anesthesia sc n2^.A^ to CP compensated as set forth in Board Resolution No. 75/843. Agreement includes availability for Anesthesia Services: [ ] yes [X] No 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2.b, pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4.' Services. Contractor shall render the services specified in 2.b. above, including all services normally and custowarily connected therewith, including on-call services, and such additional services as are required, at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or health 0:ficer. The aferena:ned shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may mage such changes in the duty schedule as are required. The County shall not change :assigned duties without consultation anti h ret-n�nt of the Contra ctvr. r^-" of thin A��i£'.��.::.`., thc- :i•_C�;.^:T� Director and/or Health Officer are authorized to act on behalf of the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from: its effective date, as indicated In Section 2.c. throui 1: (-doper 31, 1976, but it may be cancellc-' -'--edia_ely by nutual cansent, or :.y either party, by giving 30 days advance written notice thereof to the other. 6, and Fsi....sian. Thls contract ixty be i.,.JifIC(I and/or e5.L-uded by mutual ;:Z;recrent of the Cocnty and the Contractor and approved b, tiles Board. t icrof ilmed with board order •-• i t ' _ Number . -26 - 749 7. l'aycaent. l'teh month the Contractor shall tnvoicu the County in tlic form prescribed by the County, clearly specifying services rendered to the County. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by rice County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: a. if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2.d. for each hour approved; or b, if monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2.d. or pro-rata account for said approved period, or for additional services, at the per hour rate. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Cade, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations, procedures and bylaws for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Connector functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security Taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. ' 11. Pritiile ,es. Contractor ::ill retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations s-ich as physicians unions, medical societies, and non-profit medical corporations. 12• Insurance. If obtainable at a reasonable cost, County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance including professional malpractice liability as provided in the policy No. CL 299845 issued by Providence Washington Insurance Croup to the County and in effect on October 1, 1975 with limits of $500,000 per person and S1,000,000 pe- -current^. oncet�bre'_I= liabl!!—y i.-.zt-.r;,nce policy No. 4173-5634 4_311! 3 by Lh— insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania with a li.nit of $5,000,000 each occurrence/annual aggregate to the County and in effect on October 1, 1975 covering both the contractor and the County under this agreement. The County shall have sole and absolute discretion to determine whether the post of obtaining such police or policies of insuraneo is reasonable- If the County determines that liability insurance, including professional malpractice insurance, or malpractice insurance only, is not obtainable at a reasonable cost, the Caunty will become self-insured (Govt. C.f990.1+) and will cover contractor's liability to the same extent as covered in policies Nos. CL 299845 and 4173-5674 issued by the above named Insurance Companies to the County and in effect as of October 1, 1975 not to exceed $5,000,000 including any umbrella coverage, which the County may be able to obtain, insofar as permitted by the Constitution and Statutes of the State of California. 13. Assi_rnmvnt. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder without the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNT CON''TRACTOR ByA-II&J" By C.�i��:�:nS--l:ta:�r'�-af-Sepertiisa:---orDes i Epee Director, Human Resources Agency Dated: ATTEST: J. R. OLSSO.\, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Loard .' By Drputy UU 00402. NcNdlcal DIrector or Onicer .. c,r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 -M In the Matter of Consideration of Lease of Discovery Motivational House Facility The Director, Human Resources Agency, having recommended that the Board authorize the Real Property Division, Public Works Department to negotiate for lease of the residence located at 4639 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez (Discovery Motivational House) to be effective as of December 1, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the matter is referred to the Administration and Finance Committee for review and report. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entwed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept: Co. Administrator Widness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Director, Human Resources affixed this 16th day of December , 19 75 Agency County Administrator � J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Administration and By' o�I- Deputy Clerk Finance Committee -VAMaxine M. Ne ed vu4O3 H 24 8/75 IOU euyefrr.y.,,.• ...r:,,. . 1 ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES 25CO Alhambra Avenue Martinez, Cafifornio DEC _ , �l To: Arthur G. tfill Date: 1 DEC 75 _ of County :i'�'+ rt Str2`...- � i'7si(;ld i:illian R. .<r.� I, Chic Madical Admin tive Se`s►• jes Er°m: L. Van r'L-Aster, Director Subject: Lease for '4639 Pacheco Blvd. bin Resources 'Agency ! Martinez 94553 On 25 MAR 75 the Board of Supervisors approved a contract (24752) with hlu= Services Facilities, Inc. to establish and maintain a facility as a Discovery Mtivational House during the term of the contract at a cost of $1254662, this contract i.•as later extended for three (3) months from 27 JLK 75 to 30 SEP 75 with an additional payment of $4000. While the majority of the contract objectives have been accomplished ( the house is established, equipment is in et cetera ), there are a few conditions that have not been met ( staff has not been able to establish a method of ongoing com mmications, with tiumn Services Facilities, Inc., and the required cost report due within 60 days of 30 JLNI 75 has not been submitted). This contract lapsed on 1 OCT 75 and from that time we have been exploring various methods of continuing the ongoing management of the house. Of the various alternatives pursued :.e have decided to do the management of the house udthin.Mental Health. To enable us to assume the management of this residence we need a Board Order authorizing Public Works to negotiate with the owmer for a lease oa this site effective 1 DEC 75. This Board Order should also authorize county payment of vino s utilities on this site from 1 OCT 75. Since there is a strong possibility of this program being shut dot-in because of utilities being shut off because of non payment, we request that this request be expeditiously handled. - 1he stoney for the lease and the utilities are budgeted for in Cost Center 540 sub unit 706 under the State Drug Contract. If there are any questions, please call Cdr. Pascalli at extension 4395. .IRD:LP:dj RECEIVED ----- �. R. assoN cuu,c soaza a* surcawsozs 00404 • � ^ostw c A-50 5r: 11175 JAiaro#if mA v1A 5octr3 or3et i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Payment for Various Utilities for the Discovery Motivational House On the recomaaendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is authorized to pay the utilities for the Discovery Motivational House, located at 4639 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez, effective October 1, 1975 through December 31, 1975. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept: Co. Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Auditor-Controller Su pervisors Director, Human Resources affixed this ILth day► of December . 19 75 Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By ,r? ;�;�� %�� Deputy Clerk "nary Crai z, ON05 H 24L W75 IOM CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES 0'r,,*-, •'• 2300 Alh=6o Avenue Martinez, California DEC ., To: Arthur G. M-11 Date; 1 DEC 75fie o,' County _ dministrar^ �`'� •'t+ir. _ William R. �4�%n _ , Chie Medical t.1Seg ies From: ; L. Iran iarzer, Direct� ! Subiect: Lease for 4639 Pacheco Blvd, Hunan Resources Agency � �� Martinez 94553 Ul On 25 MW 7S the Board of Supervisors approved a contract (24752) with h%mm Services Facilities, Inc. to establish and maintain a facilit}t as a Discoimry Mtivational House during the term of the contract at a cost Of $1253662. this contract w•as later extended for three (3) months from 27 JW 7S to 30 SEP 75 with an additional payment of $4000. Rile the majority of the contract objectives have been accomplished ( the house is established, equipment is in et cetera ), there are a few conditions that have not been met ( staff has not been able to establish a method of ongoing communications, tcith Human Services Facilities, Inc., and the required cost report due within 60 da)-s of 30 JIN 75 has not been submitted). This contract lapsed on 1 OCr 75 and from that time we have been exploring various methods of continuing the ongoing management of the house. Of the various alternatives pursued we have decided to do the management of the house %-.!thin Mental flealth. To enable us to assume the management of this residence we need a Board Order authorizing Public :tiorks to negotiate with the ouner for a lease on this site effective 1 DEC 75. This Board Order should also authorize county paymeni of van us to tlities on tais site from 1 OCr 75. Since there is a strong possibility of this program being shut down because of utilities being shut off because of non payment, we request that this request be eipeditiously handled. The money for the lease and the utilities are budgeted for in Cost Center 340 sub unit 706 under the State Drug Contract. If there are any questions, please call Mr. Pascalli at extension 4395. IxM:LP:dj RECEIVED 00, 406 J. t ocsoN CLERK sOaxa o wxaVtsozs COST � 9 • s s A-50 SM 11/75 1Vl aofilmed vrttli 6eara orae? in the Board of Supervisors c os Cai-' fa Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 1n the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Juvenile Court Ward On the request of the County Probation Officer, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that authorization is GRANTED for placement of a disturbed Ward of the Court, Court Number 41049, at Sunny Hills, San Anselmo, at a monthly cost not to exceed $1,450, effective December 17, 1975. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoin3 is a true and cWM6 copy of an ardar erdart:d on tha minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforssaid. Orig: Probation Department Witness my land and the S?ai of the Board of cc: County Probation Officer Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affix--d h' s 16th day of December t9 75 County Administrator J. R. QLaSQV, Clerk Q Deputy Clerk x ��tia . IS-sa ine M. VNeel bs nx In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 In the Matter of Authorizing Special Board Rate for a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Hunan Resources Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES special board rate of $200.00 per month for a dependent child of the court (Court Number 33297) in the home of Onnia Manning in Pittsburg, California; effective December 3, 1975. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, HRA Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Social Service Supervisors Attn: M. Hallgren affix" this 16th day of December 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller B �- , v` y Deputy Clerk " 24 'V" 's'' Maxine M. Ne e d 0040 in Fi:e Board of S Oi Cos-4ma Cama"t County, Stata of California December 16 , t4 75 In the Motter of Acceptance of Gift. The County Administrator having notified this Board that a gift of $200 has been received from the Walnut Creek Chapter of the Gemco Foundation for the Probation Department's Girls' Center; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said gift is hereby ACCEPTED. The foregoing order was passed by the unanimous vote of the Board members present on December 16, 1975. ! 'hereby certify that the for.,-going is a truce and corma copy of an ordar entered on •ba minutes of said Board of Suparvisors an the date oforesaid. cc: Gemco Foundation Witness my hard and tha 5-=::1 of the Board of - c/o Probation Officer Supernsors County Probation Officer ofrixed :iis..3 6th day of Dp-eiemh r 19 75- County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Cizrk County Administrator rr. ' Deputy Clerk H -aa 12174 . 154M Maxine M. Neuf d MEOW t „_ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing appointment of Shirley J. Kelly as Physical Therapist at the second step of the salary range. On the recommendation of the Civil Service Commission the Board hereby authorizes the appointment of Mrs. Shirley J. Kelly to the class of Physical Therapist at the second step ($1081 per month) of Salary Range 337 ($1,030 - $1,252), effective December 17, 1975, as requested by the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept: Civil Service Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc:Director, Human Resources Agen. SuPervisocs County Auditor-Controller affixed this 16th day OlDecember 19 75 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Hospital g Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufeld 0l/` O H 24 8/75 IOM �, II 1 H 24 8/75 10m MMAIMMMMI MI1'4'�lr,y l.ew. t :h I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 -75 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Agreement #75-53655 with the State of California for Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Project IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute State Contract #75-53655 for provision of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Project for the period July 1, 1975 to June 30, 1976 at a cost not to exceed $521,600 in federal funds, under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 1 hereby certify that the foreHobv is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of sold Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig• Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of su Attn: Contracts Unit cc: County Administrator affixed this 16th day of December _ 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Department 8Y1�j,,� l Deputy Clerk H 2 a2,rs Sverre of California f�taxine M. N e d .. CONT ' ••+ f �- fir.•- � •* - .. _ _ ❑ •- wACraft- S'i Aft" ARD AGS£'cl ENT—�iT' "Eces�n i L . ~.• — .• - - 13 srwTs wcacr S14W.J4•LALwaw9914 STC .�%V.tors-■ ❑ 099 ON GEM.SM cowmaLLm THN ACHEE\:E.1T.made and entt�.d into this First dai of June ill 75 0 ;a the Sra:.• n' 1w n' 1and betuam State of CaL'foriw, t wmSb its duly elected or appointed. 7eni.0 m-B•^•a Avj:i.^-E R UrATZ AG:iDCY NYYOii! A slauaiiL ;-4.4c. Eiplicial l-1-1- ar-r-m_.ant Brand 1 f partnnnt of itoalth � 7r, 53e5r h•:.•..;:Cl ice.■i.L' :i4:::..'■r.•1a - :4'scr cakd t w L.M�rarm T. J • t`. I :\F.SSETTI: n.-tt the Contractor for and in cmisiden.tion of th, 00%Vw*nK conditions, agmmma% and stFowla:ons of the S :tc hereinafter mpnn-sed, does hereby agree to famish to the State services and:i aterials, as f dlows: :•.!�rJ1:sJtics so ae na:1?rlr1ly Conoxmr. m bs ycl1'J+Caarnoesx.�la Pecs ar Gonl�tefoll,mid<:.'toeh yLJJJs and�rs,iE aR►J•1 1• The agreevent is entered into pursuant to Section 1115 of Title XI of Ue.Social Security Act and Section 14321 of the California Welfare and Ins ti tuti ons Code• i 2. The attached Exhibit A entitled "mmnstration of Implemntation of E.P.S.Q.T. Program in two model areas (urban and rural) in Contra Costa County" consisting •of 63 pages is m3:e a part hereof by this reference. . 3. Jogi Knanna, N.D. , is designated the Program .r,:r'-ctor. The State reserves the rignt, to approve any suustilEute director. 4, Fred Harvey, Fanily Health Services Section, is designated the departmental Project Ccordinator. S. Tie attached Exititit a, Budget, is carie a part hareof by this reference. 5. The attaG:ed Exhibit B-1 entitled "rr..+lect Personnel" consisting of roar pages is made a part hereof by .; is reference. FORMAPPROVED Ta p-mvisions az Lye rzverse side h m .cmns tut•a part.of this acnvnee:et. XM ROm fig IN :L'1`F`:F.SS Nt`f:E ECF, this a_ :hent f,. ee le i secured i:•i tl r pa•�.;ft leerebo, r'r�.•o'W ±ittea. MUM OF CALIFOR\L� 1'FRLCTOR C-. T■'tA ■ a- r T•�Af1 JA ir'•' .r:ln 3TJTL•IYMi':I.SR R t.7■{J?><J::]•/. !f It wil ■� UeplarL'w■1t of Her..1t!1 .:r!T �•� rQ t 4 s•• •la ar• sK+ �.Y:i%ar1oJ►:x�i.;.swa-�Q=ti _ 4_s S i? ..�. _a... tr:T_ ..�._.._ u. Financial ;Iwscemant Branch So_rd of Sua--r-r:tors DEC 16 1975 weosEl:' ::O Ie:YEC oN i 9"ESTS,MACH YEAVU40 24MC OF COa1T:t M-TOR• 651 Pure Spy l artlnee Ca e l ior.:i:i 90,53 s—rs .-asr�s%%ad-r ssrw W- rO:JK SY w<,&NNO 59 �w.i�3T:v: ii+7tG�fSi7.rV srr r;.wz sirs iw rl+ts�j■s� ,.-..rlon tGl s 52116GO i Health and Safe* Code � Pub 1 i c meal th Fede r:1 UNWINC -43CRE0 oALANCCI JTZ �CYtl■JRsN tAIUTCS 7111CAL'i`►R 11975-76 AIM MCMIt.Siaa Z+c:.1.. JRJNCTi>•1 - -"A"" s ! Gperatin. experts` and Su#rwnt ADJ. D*CR$Af1R410 C%cu•e• 1 L.!Hi aw-IM %LLOT:•EY! 6Ri-cr 11:•T•'%1/l'nsft•% +n r 7ensd ira-- 'a*r Zi ar IJ04-rad}9aLN T a.A.tfo. M.N.wo. �ae.xe,stir'rS.`-:hrxK«dr•r•>�c!��•eprrJ:-�we>�a:cc,1 r S:i V A a t f• r �.y:.y. ••z s C�4 a .:ICY.: 4 � � 1�i:•ri:}�•L.r:� •=w•c.'l;..:id::.•�•frs szrwl0.5.w xt fGr�s�SR•tr:l6riaeitth•!se Sea ate . ' n 1:''.•.!•.l3 1hLew in-ra:wa-•�';-.i:a 24-,■::.i:irss thwun r"t is.-.wrt j;-sm s vww$;Aw r::,rn."Ln.•wi Fns wo. 81"";J04:4LW 4V 2-.L8 U&GML%G'OM 41CHA r 7:"C 403'EnW. 1 DwTZ e• -r�asrae.: • M aofilmed wwith boar or er'"�' N County of Contra Costa 75-53655 First day of June 1.975 Page 2 of 2 7. The State reserves the right to use and reproduce ail reports and data produced and delivered pursuant to this contract and reserves the right to authorize others to use or reproduce such materials. 8. The Contractor shall submit any subcontracts to the State for approval prior to implementation. Upon termination of any subcontract, the State shall be notified iumediately. 9. All reports, invoices, or other communications are to be delivered to the Project Coordinator, Family Health Services Section, Department of Health, : 714 P Street, Room 300, Sacramento, California 95814. 10. Contractor shall submit a monthly report to the State of the proceedings of E.P.S.D.T. Advisory Board. _ 11. Contractor shall obtain written permission from the State prior to any purchase of equipment not in accordance with the budget attached hereto. 12. Contractor shall not employ or engage the services of any consultant in the performance of this agreement without obtaining the prior written approval of the consultant by the State. 13. In consideration of t•1he above services, performed in a manner acceptable to the State, the State shall reimburse the Contractor quarterly, in arrears, upon submission of an invoice, on Contractor's letterhead, in triplicate, with original signature of Contractor or his designee authorized to sign on behalf of Contractor, stating the inclusive time period covered and this contract nu.:ber, for actual itemized expenditures in accordance with the bud-get attached hereto provided; however, that the Contractor small not exceed by 25 percent or S1 ,000, whichever is less, any individual item in the budget; that the Contractor submit an explanation of the need for such excess with the claim for reir.mursement. 14. Contractor shall maintain a daily log of personnel and hours expended; such listing to be compiled and totaled on a monthly basis and limited to all personnel not engaged on a fuli-time assignment to the project. 1 15. The total amount of this contract shall not exceed $521 ,600. Pay=ent shall be made to contractor from Federal funds provided to the State pursuant to Section 1115 of the Social Security Act by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, grant 11-P-57671/4-03. Payment is contingent upon tiie availability of such Federal funds to the State for the purposes of this agreement. 16. The period of this contract is July 1 , 1975 through June 30, 1976. 17. The attached Exhibit A(F), additional Provisions, is wade a part hereof by this reference. . 00413 t rY .. -- - r - - 's U•:to, PY11\(i,-4N Or rutti. ' 1tEALT11; CI?a�1.1 Ili::, !a:-) Y:I'Ll- RE •�a case^ic1••r^ce. SOCIAL MAI rtC1641911_.I I Al 10:6 U:JIVICC. t�. PROAXT Sure:ARY ---� \ Sltt•7:t11ir+:t�' :^LrAL A•.za r+LatA:,ttriw`t;.s: SCIawCE- a A�,.t::v:t?►t_ O-C- ;?.31 t� itlt.a.of t•,w.rt.ca demonstration of Implementation of•E.P.S.D.T. Program in two model areas (urbanand rural) in Contra Costa County" Ctvr.rt•rAi.:♦,+C OFf"ICIAL 1IILCS C•r INL 8`1401LCT OU(LCTO#:.AM✓ALL 41061CM P;6O&L611Ot.AL s•ENSwNutL P-ota^ri: B. Jornlin, Director }dur t; Resourccs Agency - Contra Costa County, California now: AK;) I.-M.tar's! of,AS-PI-2c•.•:: ..LL,:CV OAR rgGara►w4iLea Con,"L a Cos La Cc+unty Health L'ep rt£.t_nt r _Ca? cr.nia 94553 . 1 .a,.••t�.RY GF i l.:.Y:2i.:v�::a.-_-r_.•y a_•272.-ee less—ara ec�6,i ca_at Gr:•) - . i In the Scieacr Intorr.C4an Eac%r-•gc_ rri iw r8e2•ess cee er:Ces;e-! e2eneict resc:rch In t'w stia:ba C>;cre t:rwe•L..�sv ir-cat:�piJ:a •.?-J,e�;uear sued awia' t':C1. YNde aK=a.vvr is se tc vsed!Se these p..teses. . r This pro cct is to co1:::uc:: an evalluati e .-Lags O*1 i �:c chi2:T.s rt S -,:.• ' under the Chid Neal-to anet LiScL�fj1tj 1': f'':�?TtiG:l �1C�1.22`.1 ::t-al '' 1 rg _ :r.L1 c EFSDT :3CreC---7s_ It is con --` •fin 'Z s,he t-•'C -t: f .... SCC in C:Ji2j �.a_a.G:2 ti tl �.._ ✓_..,-,. �.:� S.�C4.t41 �rC85 G the CotJ=aa:� lna �tlri.00a OA. site t0 �t c?1ic. e CUL, E:Z�--n i n ci third t te + CG::�.:_ 11� , t0 tPS Z ti2e Ga.♦.1.4c::r�' 17f an a-0. ler^ate t1i.'_ Oi B..r..a-i.•a_C•.l CO-ii C .esC;rCC"Tt2:Ig. i This is an 7Vr.1.:Suz,'. n_oject. It basically consists Ci Ova CoLL.,- cC,.Id,,: ^:l . JC1�\'�C.' ��e`• ._. ..a�.:. ilr.'. pa- in o:1J y' for c..Ze.. Z::Id f a-?Cana! cos L of lI1Q rest"el :C.. an-.a evaluation so that_ :'h= f;:�Cf's'C:^.e gained in • tCi(7 service -13 Cogra:,, can oi>ject ii'ei 1Je is aee cavaiiiJle to otic =s. - ' t - s - - S _ I SIGtiA7 Vn t2c OR } UR: It .�CSOr_. CCc 7ge' C1 Pi:O!£Cj � t' OfiG�t:17:.116:1 VICE:10P LU 8.31 11SL i1r.S S:•/CCL - OUA14 c:+.a•stu.,+a•rA.rco a•+rv_ roiav hwGC o w t:•.fu iU .rat•r••tt0 t.uCv. iCI7�1 r U / ��_.�._�� . PAGE e Y low w S 4 r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 19 In the Motter of Request of Director, Human Resources Agency, to Utilize a Social Service Staff Member on a Detached-Duty Basis to the Human Resources Agency. The Board having considered the request of the Director, Human Resources Agency, that he be authorized to utilize a Social Service staff member on a detached-duty basis to the.Human Resources Agency for legislative liaison work in the social services and health fields during the 1976 session of the California State Legislature; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said request is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and J. P. Denny) for report on December 23, 1975. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Committee members Supervisor: Director, Human Resources affixed this i Er.h day of Tloc�c+mhPr i97y y County Auditor-Controller j , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Personnel By, Deputy Clerk County Administrator mary"Crai 00415 H 23 8175 ION 1> NNW In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 1975 In the Matter of Memorandum Report from County Administrator on 1975 Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY) The Board having heretofore entered into a contract with the County Superintendent of Schools for administration of the 1975 Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (a Human Resources Agency Manpower Project program) , which contract was funded under Title I and Title III of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973; and The County Administrator having submitted a memorandumm report dated December 12, 1975, including a statistical study, with respect to the aforesaid program; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said memorandum report is acknowledged. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Dept: HRA Supers cc: Superintendent of Schools affixed this 1Ean day of December , 197 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By %�f7 Deputy Clerk Vary Cram 00416 H 24 8/75 IOM R E.C VE-1D OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building ^ 1— J•::a Martinez. California To: rd of Supervisors Date: December 12, 1975 1 1 From: Arthur G. Will, Subiect: Summer Program for Economically County Administrator Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY), This year your Board contracted with the County -Superintendent of Schools for the administration of the 1975 Summer Program for Economically Disadvantaged Youth (SPEDY) for the period June 23, 1975 through October- 1, 1975, utilizing funds made available to. the County under Titles I and III of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973. Under this contract, jobs were afforded to 1,372 youth at various locations throughout the County, each working 25 hours a week at $2.10/hour. Only 4.56% of the funds allocated and expended for this program were actually spent for administrative cost. Fourteen organizations throughout the County were used to recruit youth, and the method of recruitment and intake process allowed a great number of the County's eligible applicants to be aware of the SPEDY program. This effort did draw a representative portion of the economically disadvantaged population from the County. A wide variety of work experience opportunities were made available, including positions in an auto repair shop, libraries, child care centers, rehabilitation centers and schools, police departments, parks and recreation departments, hospitals, etc. An innovative project this year was that of providing training for ten enrollees to become licensed Class II drivers. They set the wheels in motion for numerous excursions: to the State Fair, Marine World, ball games, film presentations, Bay Area concerts and plays, and camping trips to Lake Camanche and Tomales Bay. Young people were also encouraged to participate in their local summer programs, often combining work experience and class- room training. Job finding workshops were conducted for enrollees interested in seeking full time employment. In an October 21, 1975 letter of Wallace L. Brown, Federal Representative of the Department of Labor on Manpower Adminis- tration, addressed to Supervisor W. N. Boggess, he noted that his monitoring reviews of the program revealed no significant weakness in the SPEDY program, nor any corrective actions to be taken. 0041'7 FVI:eb hiiaofitmrd vrith ward order. < SEER PROGRAM FOR ECONOMICALI,y CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, DISADVANTAGED STAGED Yf;7TH SUMMER Of 1979; u ,, An innovative project this year was that of prow_Luj..,Ly �J- .., �. for ten enrollees to become licensed Class II drivers. They set the wheels in motion for numerous excursions: to the State Fair, Marine World, ball games, film presentations, Bay Area concerts and plays, and camping trips to Lake Camanche and Tomales Bay. Young people were also encouraged to participate in their " local summer programs, often combining work experience and class- room training. Job finding workshops were conducted for enrollees interested in seeking full time employment. In an October 21, 1975 letter of Wallace L. Brown, Federal Representative of the Department of Labor on Manpower Adminis- tration, addressed to Supervisor W. N. Boggess, he noted that his monitoring reviews of the program revealed no significant weakness in the SPEDY program, nor any corrective actions to be taken. OU41"7 FVI:eb PX=ofi1m_d with 5oaa order. S""E.R PI2p� FOR ECONOU C" COSTA COUNTY,�O AGED yn� E i SdB of 1975 I• Total Funds 'allocated for the Program A' CETA Title I B. CETA Title III $ 77,000 .. 61-- Z----5-� Total $689,509 II. A. Actual Expenditures 1. Amount earned by participant - s. Wages Fringe Benefits $509,291 7,402 Total $516,693 2- Total . expenditures for administration services of the Program: $245,307 and 3- eve)Expenditure (combining B" Funds allocated for $662,000 balance of $27,509. the Program have a remaining II. Demographic Characteristic Of Participant. Sex: Male . 700 Femaler,_3 67-7i 722 Age: 18 Yearsold and 19 - 21 years nn Old 1.100 272 Ethnic Group: White _`� Black 766 American Indian 522 Others 32 52 Of the X72 receiving1,372 youth served, 749 were Public assist from assistance. families 00418 r t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 197 In the Matter of Request to Sell Surplus Property within Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking). The board 'having this day considered the December 15, 1975 report from the County Administrator with respect to the request made by the Danville Parking District Taxpayers Advisory Committee to initiate necessary actions to sell on March 16, 1976 surplus property acquired by Assessment District 1973-4 (Danville Off-Street Parking) ; and Said report having indicated that County staff had advised the Committee that County planning studies of downtown Danville traffic circulation (currently ,n progress) may result in events which may enhance the value of the surplus parcel; however, the Committee remains of the opinion that the surplus property should be sold as previously requested; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having stated that all . property owners within Assessment District 1973-4 are affected by the contemplated sale and that a public hearing should be held to afford them an opportunity to be heard on this matter; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that February 3, 1976 at 10:30 a.m. is FIXED as the time for the aforementioned public hearing and the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish notice of same in THE VALLEY PIONEER. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: Mr. Flynn Supervisors County Administrator affixed this i At day of naaa,,h r . 19 y Public :7orks Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning By Count,: Counsel ���` �`r'' Deputy Clerk !Lary Craig 90an9 H�S 8/75 lOM H;S 8/» lull I, t IN 77HE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Platter of Agreement ) with the City of Richmond. ) December 16 : 1475 ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the City of Richmond for reimbursement of services provided by said city to the Control of Major Offenders in Burglary and Related Offenses Project conducted by the County Office of the District Attorney during the fiscal year 1975-1-976 in accordance with State OCJP Grant Award Contract No. A-1576-3-75. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 Orig DA-lk CMTNM COPY cc: District Attorney I eftft that W3 u3 a fait, true & correct copy of Administrator the ort9irai dor_tu�xcnt whfeh t, on Pito in my office, and that it uses Pt,-,ed & urf),Ptvd by the Board of Auditor--Controller Su9*rvi:0res of t­: caitL Cnu:,tc, ra'ffornia, on s 0[ floq. County the date sher r•.. J. : .�'::t ': t. ., City of Richmond Clerk&es-ofttc:o Clerk oc safd Board of Supervisors. Office of Criminal Justice by Deputy clerk. Planning 011DEC 16 19151 0M t� �I 1 j AGREEMENT 2 'i THIS AGREME.NT, entered into this 16th day 3 '� of December 1975, by and between the CITY OF 4 RICHMOND, California (herein called "Contractor") , and the 5 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, California, for the District Attorney's r, Office (herein called "Subgrantee") . i; 7 1i WITNESSETH: g � WHEREAS, the County has entered into grant award �j g !! No. A-1576-3-75, dated July 1, 1975, with the California Office i, 10 of Criminal Justice Planning pursuant to the provisions of the 11 1 Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (PL 90-351) , 12 said grant award being incorporated herein by this reference, I! 13 and 14 t! WHEREAS, the Subgrantee desires to engage the Con- 15 i tractor to render certain services in connection therewith; 1.6 �' NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree 17 as follows: i 18 1. Scone of Services: a) The Contractor shall in a 19 satisfactory and proper manner, as determined by the Subgrantee, 20 provide the services as detailed in Attachment A - Budget 21 Narrative and Detail taken from the approved grant application 22 and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof; b It is expressly understood and agreed that Subgrantee will 23 i ) P Y 9 9 I � 24 retail ultimate control and responsibility for the grant award 25 i project and the Contractor agrees to be bound by the teras and 26 1 conditions of said grant award applicable to Subgrantee in the 27 conduct of the project. The Contractor agrees to perform under 28 this Amendment in accordance with all terms and conditions 29 '+ contained in the OCJP Fiscal Affairs Manual and the financial 3p guidelines prescribed by the Law Enforcement Assistance 31 Administration (hereinafter referred to as LF.AA) and the OCJP. ! 2. Time of Performance: The services of the 00421 -M aofiilmed with 6oara arm 1 1 Contractor are to be performed during. the current grant period 2 for the project and shall be completed within the time period 3 allowed by the State of California, Office of Criminal Justice r 4 Planning; provided, that this Agreement may be terminated by i 5 either party upon giving the other party thirty (30) days' G j advance written notice thereof. 7 3. Maximum Compensation, Method of Payment: 8 f a. Maximum Compensation: It is expressly under- 9 stood and agreed that the total compensation to be paid hereunder Y 10 shall not exceed the maximum sum of Nineteen Thousand One Hundred 11 f Thirty-Eight Dollars ($19,138) to perform the services as out- 12 lined in Attachment A - Budget Narrative and Detail. 23 b. Method of Payment: The Subgrantee will reim- 14 } burse the Contractor for the costs of the program covered by lg ( this Agreement. Said reimbursement shall be made only upon 1G approval by the District Attorney of a request for payment from 17 the Contractor indicating the amount of payment due from the 18 Subgrantee and the budget items for which payment is requested. 19 ? The program budget, included in Attachment A, may be modified i 20 by mutual agreement of the parties hereto, but shall not exceed I 21 I Nineteen Thousand One Hundred Thirty-Eight Dollars ($19,138) . 22 4. Assignment or Subcontracting. No performance a 23 of this Agreement or any portion thereof may be assigned or I 24 + subcontracted by the Contractor without the express written �j g ; consent of Subgrantee and any attempt by the Contractor to 26 ? assign or subcontract an- performance of the terms of• this Y 27 i Agreement without the express written consent of Subgrantee 28 shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach of this 24 ! Agreement. Whenever the Contractor is authorized to subcontract 30 � or assign, he will include all the terms of this Agreement in i 31 each such Subcontract o: assignment. 32 +I S. Assurance of Compliance with Civil Rights Laws. -2- r �t �i 1 The Contractor hereby assures that it will comply with Title VI i 2 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and all requirements imposed by 3 or pursuant to regulations o,. the Department of Justice and the 4 LEAA issued pursuant to that title, to the end that no person 5 shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, sex or national ! origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits 7 of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under this 8 Agreement or under any project, program, or activity supported I 9 H by this Agreement. The Contractor will comply with Justice 10 Department Equal Employment Regulations in federally-assisted 11 programs (28 CFR Part 42, Subpart D) to the end that employment 12 discrimination in such programs on the grounds of race, color, 13 creed, sex, or national origin shall be eliminated. The i 14 {� Contractor recognizes the right of the United States to seek 1 � la i� judicial enforcement of the foregoing covenants against discri- � 1G mination. The Contractor does have an affirmative action plan 17 which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of 18 ji race, color, religion, creed, national origin, sex, and age and 19 Ij which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementa- 20 1� tion of equal employment. , 21 6. Maintenance and Inspection of Contractual Records. 22 The Contractor agrees that the Subgrantee, the OCJP, the LEAA, 2s the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their 24 , duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt and transcribe any directly 25 26 pertinent transactions relating to this Agreement. Such material � i 27 ,i must be kept and maintained for a period of three years after 28 termination of the grant award or until an audit is completed by i 29 OCJP and LEPUA and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, 30 whichever is sooner. The Contractor agrees to keep and maintain S 31 ; all records prescribed by LEAA, and any other records that may be 3' ii required by oz-her laws or regulations of Federal, state or local -3- �� �9U3 . 1 ,'a 1%. I governmental units. 2 7. Compliance with Economic Stabilization Programs. 3 The Contractor certifies that the submission of an invoice or 4 voucher for property, goods or services furnished under this 5 Agreement do not exceed the maximum allowable levels authorized f 6 j by the Cost of Living Council regulations or standards. Viola- 7 tions shall be reported to OCJP and the local Internal Revenue g Service field office. 9 8. Public Availability of Information. The 10 Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Section 6250 11 through 6260 of the Government Code of the State of California 12 and the LEAA Guide for Comprehensive Law Enforcement Planning 13 and Action Grants relating to the availability to the public of 14 1 identifiable records or other documents that are pertinent to 15 the receipt or expenditures of LEAA funds. f 1,3 IN WITNESS 11HEREOF, the Contractor and the Subgrantee 17 r have executed this contract as of the date first above written. 18 { ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK NT CO UNI SUBGRANITEE) 19 41 � ��� N- X99 20 ;; c tv c�.E. . y= DEC 16 1975, 21 N iApproved es to form: 22 23 IF +,j Deputy County Counsel 24 ! 25 ATTEST: CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal �. corporation (CONTRACTOR) �J �a 26 j! d.�_ �:c. k .. *JG1 City clerkBy L_ 27 Mayor 28 ,� Approved as to form: 29 tj 301 i_V Attorney r-� 31 321 —4 �_---.....___.... '.`C.r�ew2r1:C'y^'&41LYi"i' $$1pq`}R• ....:m,.sa VT^TaRa`.nM,••: ' II f 27 City Cler r G'<<e Mayor i i 28 Approved as to form: 29 � j ; 3011 �3. y_ Attorney 31 �t 32 -4- { t 1 A. Assistant Police Woman 2 One Assistant Police Woman will be employed one-hundred 3 , percent tun•e for the duration of this project. The Assistant f �\ 4 Police Woman will be charged with two basic responsibilities: 5 ii (1) the provision of clerical support to the project personnel 6 i working within the police department; and (2) the operation and d 7 � maintenance of the Police Information Network (P.I.N.) system. 8 B. Supplies and Operating Expenses 1. Office Supplies 9 ? �. 10 � Funds have been allocated to purchase office supplies 11 relative to anticipated programmatic expenditures. The pro- 12 jetted monthly expenditures listed in the detailed project 33 budget are based upon current District Attorney's Office indi- 14 vidual utilization rates. j 2. Duplication and Printing Costs 355 � - • 1Funds have been allocated for anticipated duplication 17 � and printing cost expenditures. The projected monthly expendi- 18 i� ture listed in the detailed project budget is based upon current 19 �! District Attorney's Office rates. 2 i' 3. Equipment Rental ..0 Funds have been allocated for the rental of a Police 21 22 Information Network (P.I.N.) system. The P.I.N. system, capable 23 �S of receiving information relative to probation orders, is a 1 24 i necessary mechanism for dissemination of probation information 25 to police and criminal justice agencies. 26 4. Confidential Expenditures- 27 Funds have been allocated to provide monies for confi- �' dential expenditures. These funds will be utilized primarily by 28 t, j p 29 project ect police officers in .payment for the purchase of �' 30 material as evidence. a 31 32 ATTACIDIEN3T A - BUDGET MARRATIVE AND DETAIL j 7 { 1 1 ATTACHO1E M A - BUDGET NARRATIVE AND DETAIL 2 3 One Assistant Police woman at $ 9,432 1008 time x $786/month x 12 months 4 Retirement - 20.1295% of salary 1,899 5 Health - $21.38 per month x 12 months 257 6 Dental - $12.55 per month x 12 months 151 �1 Uniform Allowance - $10 per month x 12 months 120 ? j $ Office Supplies: 2 staff" members at $20/month x 12 months each 480 9 Duplication and Printing: 10 2 staff members at $15/month x 12 months each 360 li Equipment Rental: Police Information Network at $150/month 1,800 12 x 12 months 13 Confidential Expenditures 2,500 14 1 $16,999 15 The above amounts have been allocated -from federal funds. 16 t ty 1? 18 19 � 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2? f 28 i 29 30 31 �! ft IML No M_ _1M 3� 1� ,1 E rd by OY ICL: OF Chliunrtl., jUSiZCC PL%-.11ING The Office of Crit:nal Justice Planning. hereinafter designated^ "OCJP", hereby makes a grant award of funds to Gnntr i Co a Cbunty h-'r'_in iter dicsiSnated thi_' "Stb.rartee" und,:-r t:2:e provisions of Title 1, part C U=.ibus C:ir.:a Control an-' $3z • t. J��l:i.�.J ia.. ::u� lni ui/ :�-3j,� :T:+ t;:'�:�:'t'.� r -tV�I•f� . hereinafter designated "Safe Street, Ac:.", in the -w-not--it and for the purpose and dlu_atio:; set forth in this grant award. Pro art Ti;'_t tCo itratt No. let'72--i-7= Control of Majar Oifenders in Burglary project r:o. and Related Offenses 1576-3 'Grant Period 9/1 75 - 8/30/76 Project Director (Name, Address, Telephone) Federal Amount S3010 Samuel H. Mesnick Staatete Buy in Assistant District Attorney S 1,666 Contra Costa County Local Hard :latch District Attorney's Office $48,929 Financial Officer (Name, Address, Telephone) Other Match H. Donald Funk Auditor-Controller Total Project Cost Cont.:, Costa County S60,595 This grant award c.,nsists of this title page, the application for the grant which is aLt-ac.!; hereto as Attac�enz A and made a pdxL [iCtCtJr, aiia't :,a�t•a'Svvau vZaw:.�. »:.�.�. �L`.^.';i1�,S-.yn� •;+n_! are attached hereto as Attachrsent 8 and nude a part hereof. The Subgrantee hereby signifies its acceptance of this g--=t award and agrees to administer the grant project in accordance with the tem and cer-'' ns se* forth in or incorporated by reference in this grant award and the p � - vision of the Safe Streets Act. 75 Official Autj -ized to Sign for Subgrantee Name ---i=zmi 3o;,sew 41 Title: Chairman, Contra Costa Co. Bid. of SLper A.U V8 1975 Address: :ic ��i3t^ation Bid-. 0 ! ;sa_tinez, CA 94553 L`.�ay t%wr:tpr I Yere ,�tt:€ --t~. all conditions for exemption set forth in State Administrative Manua ' Section 1201.13 have been complied-with and this document is exempt from review by the Departsa mt of :Finance. ;,MRecu!t�ivedixector, ,aOCE-i��Tr2 r JuN 12197TJ OC,Jti SPECIAL DIMOSIT GEItiCRAL FUND _ FUND Li-INI,' ITa2 S/- 1.3 Fiscal Year/r�! Fiscal Officer —e_- .'A1"/�• /.�" r' - ;f'' UC3 P G g t ' R/7� i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Contract #24-067 with Ten Gearhart, Ph.D. to Provide Training in Alcoholism for County Mental Health Staff IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #24-067 with Ten Gearhart, Ph.D. for provision of training in Alcoholism on January 26, 1976 for County Mental Health staff with a payment limit of $75.00 and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 I hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and correct copy►of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Human Resources Agency super Attn: Contracts Unit aBixed this 16th day of December 19 7`L cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor gy Deputy Clerk H 24 IV74 - ISM Maxine M. Net, e d County Medical Services/Mental Health C.-atra C?Sea County _ Standard Form SHORT FOR:1 SERVICE C4`+TR.XT :1 L_ . f 1. Co::rract Identification. Num3erAw l9 Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Rental Health Staff training ("Growth and Change-*Ucoholism") 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contra�or mutually agree and promise as follows: �3: Contractor: RL'� GEARHAR�,`Ph D. Capacity: Self-employed individual (Training Consultant) Address: 601 Steiner, San Francisco, California 94117 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is January 26, 1976 and it terminates January 26, 1976 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Te^ination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon fire-day advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Parent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $-7i-nn 6. Couatv's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as descri=ed below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and fo= prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by . the heai of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, accordi-Ig to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE Rti:E: $ 75.00 per service unit: ( 2) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of QnC (1) service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in "Growth and Change—Alcoholism" for County-selected persons on January 26, 1976 in the time, place and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. One session, for pa}=ent purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least two (2) full hours of such service. 8. Ir._enendent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Ir.-e ification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consecUla-tial damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the neg=igence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Leta_ Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Governmear Code Sections 26227 and 31000; Welfare and Institutions Code, Div. 5, Part 2, The Short-Doyle Act; and California Administrative Code, Title 9, Subchapter 3 Community Mental Health Services under The Short-Doyle Act. 11. Si natures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: Cousin-- C O'TR. STA, CALIFO:LNI A DE4 1 L i s" CQNTRACTOR t"a D�_:ignee � Reco..:..c.�Ld by Departm_::; (Desigiatelofficial capacicl) B . a' r /� (Fora approved by County Counsel) Designee 00429 (A-4620 10/75) �JIJ E: r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 . 14 M In the Matter of Agreement Amendment #29-201-2 with the State Department of Health to Extend the County Health Department Geriatric Screening Project for an Additional Six Months IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute amendment 829-201-2 with the State Department of Health (State #74-SO639, A-2) to extend the termination date of the Geriatric Screening Project operated by the County Health Department from December 31, 1975, to June 30, 1976, while all other provisions of the existing agreement remain unchanged, as more particularly set forth in said amendment. PASSED by the Board on December 16, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregairM is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Admin, Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 16th day of December , 19 25 County Auditor-Controller I R. OLSSUN, Clerk County Health Officer Deputy Clerk " 24 12"4 - I&M Hauine M. Ne eld 430 _.____..._.a_,.. ____-_ _ -� ,>�•�y- , . now 4 ❑ CONTRACTOR 5iANDARD AGREEMENT ❑ sr^TE.%Gzm CY S",iTB OF CALIFORNIX 'STO 2 llt/cv.10021 ❑ DEPT.of GEN.SER. THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this 29th ;day of Seore=rber , lg 75 D CONTROLLER in the State of California, by and between State of Califamia, through its duly elected or appointed, ❑ qualified and acting ❑ TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE Chiefs AGENCY NUMHER Financial ?tnagemen; Br—anch Department of Health 174-50639 ?A-2 iwrria �aaW t6 wq State, - -- -- Cont__ Costa County 29 901 - 2 nereafte► Contr+octor. \VM. ESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration of-the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to f uv&h to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth sen ice to he rendered by Contractor,a n mm to he paid Cbafte tor,bens for performance or completion,and attach plans sad speeif iseatsoms,if any,) 1. In that certain agreement. lbetzeen this Department and Contra Costa Coiurty, dated September 1, 1974, and approved on December 9, 2974 bre the State Department of-General Services: Paragraph 2 is amended to read as-follons: The period of this co��ract shall be September 1, 1974 through June 30, 1976. 2. -,AU other terms and provisi=s of said contract shall remain'ii full force and effect. jam a. The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement. - I1 WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date fust-above writtonL STATE OF CALIFORNL U CON-17RACTOR . AGENCY CONTRACTOR to orf/"Aft Ali►NDIY/DESA.STATZ 1NNZ1N9R A COR/ORATION. « r wlr.LTG! Department of Heali h cozrtra Cas4a Caunt•,r UY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:$ t ATUREI s & zm, / G N. $oyges3 Tlra_s James D. Boyd, C}uef / TITI kdmimstra 'ding, 651 Pins St. Financial :*ansgenent Branca rk�: TtZi �� �, f: aez F Cas'�`c T»T.; 2,553 y,,( s (CONTINUED ON 7`—SHEETS.EACH BF.���A---Rtt�77N'G NAME OF CONTRACTOR) Do Not W14rf in TW*Spam AMOUNT OF THISESTIMATEAPPROPRIATION FUND to 6 —0— Local Ass?stn amara EUNENCUMBERED BALANCE ITEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR S 2?9 'i) 375 1 CY71 2cll4.-75 ADJ. INCREASING ENCUM- FUNCTIOA BRAxcx S Off--;-.--Off--;-.-- asperse arA Fatigmen r r; ADJ. DECREASING ENCUM. LINE ITEM A-LOTkI'.NT BRAS`=E C1?U-ljt��4f'v7 S I 1:ercbq CYit:frJ lEj7tM Iny Otte►p7rSOnal++u w&*e that budgeted funds T.B.A.x0. D.R. NO, cre ct:i!d-Ze for the prrimd rein;rsrpose of the expenditwe stated shore. SIGNATURE OF ACCOUS+I:ING OFFICER ( DATE a � C !hcrrhy ce-eiftj dw all cowlilions for ezemption set forth in State Administrative manual Section 1101.13 !face berm camplirrl mith crul this document is ezempt from recie(v by the Department of Finance. SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE wc= DATtT Microfilmed with board order °" X F1Ylw`1t:331 P.�.�N 10.: ril ,i M --A IRS.., (CONTINUED ON 14;_�F SHEETS,EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR! FUND 00 not Wrm;*TWS Spoe+ AMOUNT OF THIS ESTIMATE AppRt7t+RtATION S —0— 1,� al r sista ATA CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR UNENCUMBERED @,AIJ►NCE IT t:1w $ 299 ,j 7, AD3. 1% EASING ENCUM- FUNCTtOY 8 RANO£ pffi.e m pentse and Eavipmen+- A0!_ MCRE ASiNG ENCUM- L%le ITEM A•rL OTNENT sit" RANGE 813_0s-145-44-05 �rlotrledgethat b•u4ered {� T.B.A.NO B.R. NO, 11wreby Cer.-ty UPM-V own personal-1 gated ttbotC• err er:::ci*ie f�t�•v�.'r'-o d A' � aATc SIGNATURE OF ACCOUN wa OFFICetion ER 1 hewhy ce rsjy that all Co.rLr W for eseatptim$a forth in State Admini Ftratke 3fanad Se Finance..0Z•Z3 hate been complied tcith clal this document is a empt from reeieto by the Department of DATZ SIGNATURE OR OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE� _ NUcrofilmed with board order ..,:..»pay.•...% _ • • 1 •. • y •_•. »yam. Y . -. .. + ^.•..V . r . .V-.♦rte " ., L The Contractor agrees to indemnify,defend and save harmless the State, its officers; agents-, and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services.materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract; and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or darnaged by the Contractor in the performance of this contract. a The,Contractor. and the agents and:empb}� of Cant- raictoS in the.performance`of this agreernenk-shall act urart independent-capacity and.riot as officers or-employees.or- agents of State of California. i. The-State may terminate this amt and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at.the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the w*orl,- in any manner deemed proper by the State. The cost to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this agreement. and the balance, if any, shall be paid the- Contractor heContractor upon demand- 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in put, b. Tune is the essence of this agreement 6. No�61teration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless matte in writing and signed by the parties hereto.and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein,. shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for :all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per deem, unless otherwise expressly-so provided =" P' s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 In the Matter of Contract Amendment Agreement 029-405-2 with the State Department of Health to Revise the Contract Budget with No Change in the Contract Payment Limit IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract Amendment Agreement #29-405-2 with the State Department of Health (State #ALC-072-74, Amendment #2) for the operation of the County Alcoholism Program Information and Evaluation System Project (formerly designated contract #28-076) to revise the project budget, thereby allowing funds to be shifted from personnel costs to certain data processing and reporting costs, with no change in the $84,873 contract payment limit (1002 State funding), and as more particularly set forth in said Contract Amendment Agreement, Passed by the Board on December 16, 1975 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Human Resources Agency Supervisors Attn: Contracts Unit cc: County Administrator affixed this 16th day of December 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Medical/ - Deputy Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - t,Wntal Health Services .axine M. Ne f d State Department of Health 01143 ` a J R ------------ ............. ❑ CONTRACTOR >=J77�)`l f STpttlKit-.aGRF� �-C APoRATTORNOVEDEY BYGENTHERAE L ❑ STATIC AGENCY S-AT=OF CAUFOPNIA ❑ D[PT.OF GEN.lER. -;To 2 c11ty.1an_b '1. Q CONTROLLER THIS AGREE.NiE_`TT,made and entered into this 1st day of October , 19 75 ❑ :n the State of California, by and between State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, ❑ qualified and acting 1'I �J'JL?.•3 ER 3�...3 �FOR STATE AGENCY NUMBER ALC-072-7 e -i»�» :�7 `agn�aanonfi 1ironCi7 3 ar}tRun{' 01 Ro 1 TTS Amendment r#2 !`t h�7eafier ceUed she S=et and County of .Contra Costa : . 405 herea}ter caUM the ConoccOr. Wrr. ESSr.T"H. That the"Contractor fox and in oonssideratinn of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State Hereinafter expressed, does bereby-agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows:' arr•_ice to be muierid by CoDocc,o,a�to be yrs Conftwtor,iime fir perfmnawe or completion,'andattaeh pleat and specili cations,if any.) . ..._:zi:oma.....: .. .. :. . ._ �.. < ._ 1. that certain agreement bet-deen this department and Contra Costa County dated Jure 3, 1974 and.approved- on October-16, 1574 by the Department of General"Services and Amendment A dated-March 24, 1975 and exempt from General Services: ?azrag:ape 14 is amended to read as follows: 1114_ The attached,Exhibit-B-1-.replaces Exhibit. B.111.-_. .._ _..i'_'": .:i: :. _ ....... :� iI:3�� - __.a' . I.�I s.. ...�'.^� :� .;i.. .'.<.:F.:�:.1 �. .. � -.:'!.<.,TIt:L7..I .• 2. he effective.date..of this amendment.is October 1, 1975: : .... ._ _: _ - .. : . _ tom•. . ....ti •<�..; F x'u;.: 3. All other-terms�aad p_rovisior_s.of said contract shall remain in full force.,zind!: effect. FORS1 APPROVED ne provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agf eement: Wete IN WTTVESS WHEREOF,.this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto,arupoarnllnlr first-above written. STATE OF-CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR , AGENCY :'''�: �.•� .._.. f;}- - _ _........ CONTRAR".T ltr OTHCR THAM AM INDIVIDUAL,STATC WHCrHjrA A COMPONATIOY, - • � .CTG) De--artment of Health C t 'o£ C Costa' aY tAUTHORIZED SIGNATUREI BY UTH E) e► Wj N. Boggess TITLE Assistant Manager, n DEC 1 g 1975` Financial Management Branca Board of Sumervisor� (CONT/NU$D ON_—SHEETS.EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR) ADDREss P.O. Box 911 (651 Pine Street) Martinez. CaliffDr 4a 94rc;3 DO Not Wrhe iw TVs Spoors � "OUNT'OF T"'r,ESTIMATEropo'"ION FUND S Sunoort General UNENCUMBERED BALANCE ITEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR $ 1 290 375 1974 1974-75 ADJ. INCREASIrG ENCUM. FUNCTION BRANCE e ADJ.DECREASING ENCUM- LIME ITEM ALLOTMENT rza"CE fie --891-44-05 I ilrrrity ce*r+ri•.pon my oars ye•rwral knowWke that budgeted funds T.B.A.No. 97 are enc ciil ke f=ir the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above. r SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER DATE a 1 hereby ce"Aat J1 eorddiola for exempton set forrh in State Adrniiartratxe Manual Sect en If 003 w hn:e iwe"ccn-plied t:;dh and this document is exempt from renew by the Department of F4=ce. SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE AGENCY DATE n Microfilmed with board order „_..^ til;�._ .•__! .''•'� :�' .• •r __ etTs.FwCN�r•AoetNc ��NO►Wish''0�s NwtuE oR mkcz ) 'taoR�d sof S[tD@ ww ouNr G, P.O. BOX 311=sorb'' LC4 16 19iy S *t.ts�ieATE e- p (65.1Pfae AotAztoN C -f ; St reef) uregyw�saw x U^lAliiCE /J t;� Stt3a02-� t`vNp . .4gRAWC shG ENwN. 1 CSC CflAf? gT�TtfTn r i A3J.OE=R �NCT/ON 375 xgPt3CAL YICAR wwx 74 1974-75 uNe tTFN I A�tOTjtzvr ►wA4E OF A=couNT'�athe FFIcell ' izated funds z.e.A No $.a above. No. IF�� s+tav ar~ `'`tfs a„�.+eap"" n �,e far; `� Or orrteeR stwt ut eTeft S !om tete` 'nuWtr G ON UENALF or TNe AGS uw b+!the D Yrt c�uust Fv�;tyi 1f 01,13 MINIM A&crofilmed with bo and order - - ...... L-► , , _ ...�-r, ._. ._.-__. .r.r. _ -_•...........r_ry��_.._."...... _ «_..-...._.. _. _....._. r.�....w«-.r..�.- �.r ,... Ni.Y,w.'�Ia..... r."The Contractor agrees bo indemnify.defend and save harmless the State, its ofcers, ger3tS _ _ __- and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and any other-person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplving.work,services.•muterials or supplies in connection with the perfairnance of this contract;. and from any and all dawns and losses accruing or resulting to any who may be-injured or damaged by the Cont-actor in the performance of this �his contract. ration - a The:-.Contractor. and the agents and employees of-Contractor, in the performance of-this agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of State of California. I The State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration} to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and ]MINIMUM in the manner herein provided.Iri the event of such termination the State may proceed with the . - work in any manner deemed proper by the State. The cost to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor,under this agreement, and-the balance, 'if any;shall be paid-the- _-- Contractor upon demand- 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part. 5. Tune is the essence of this agement. - 6. -No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.and no oral undersling or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. The consideration to-be.paid_Contractor. as provided herein, shall be in compensation for _-...._all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, _ unless otherwise expressly so provided. "t flit3 County of Contra Costa Budget Exhibit B-1 July 1, 1974 - December 31, 197.5 ALC-072-74 Amendment §2 PSISQ A"r VICE'S .Present Budget Amended Budget Amended Total. Project tanager S 4,750 $ 0 S 4,750 Alcohol ?rog:-am Evaluator 16,000 - 9,600 6,400 Data Clerk 7,000 - 7,000 0 Research Assistar.t 41800 - 559 4,241 Research Assistant 4,800 - 4,800 f6 Staff Benefits 6,?23 - 3,644 3,079 TOTAL PEMOINAL SMVICES $44,073 -525,603 518,470 EQUIP=- ' &e.at Supplies & Printing .800 800 Travel--i—State $ 0 ¢ Co=i:r_icatio=s 0 0 0 Other(specify) Data Processing: System design b program speci- fications (8 man months) 16,000 + 10,000 26,000 Program & report generation set- up (10 can =oaths) 18,000 + 15,603 33,603 Computer time for compile, test & debug 3,000 0 3,000 Computer tice for system operation (6 months) 1,500 0 0 1,500 Equipment S 1.500 S 0 S 1,500 TOTAL OPERA-TM EU ::SES AND Equip..E.r.''T S4O.EO0 +S2 56 TOTAL ntuk:ST 584,873 8 0 $84,873 00"i, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra tYoun Costs CState of Califomio lb months) 1,500 0 0 1,500 Equipment S 1,500 S 1,SOO TOTAL OPr.RAzn,,r, E:r_? zsEs LqD EQUIPIEN''T S40,80p +82 566.t TOTAL BUDGET $84,873 g 584.873 00436 _ s In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Dec. 16 _' 1975 In the Matter of Lease with Leonard and Angela Picolet IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a lease with Mr. Leonard Picolet and Mrs. Angela Picolet, 10 .9 hest dolly Dr., '�alnut Creek, California, for the use of property in West Pittsburg, California, by the UPSPROTJT Community Gardens Project during the period Dec. 20, 1975 through Jan. 1, 1977• PASSED by the Board on Dec. 16, 1975• P I hereby certify that the foregainp Is a true and corrod copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Lenartment Mrdness my hand Ond the Seal of the Board of Attn: Alan Pfeiffer Supervisors Office of Economic affixed tha 16th day of December 19 75 Opportunity , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller B De Clerk County Administrator Y Deputy Contractor-1.1r. and 111xs. Picolet Maxine M. Neufeld Hai 41175 IOM 437 rC yn° C 46 sfi � �' s° 0 �. N�e y O ° � o o �+�'Vq s O . O d' O Q '� N •r P' 0 t 'off �, t{;.O� s p�s ���1 Yi +' Q,set t ec `� s + eta „� O{y ��'► ett Q,> N °�'�� N 4SY .+a '�' �'IPA 4• cS i K 1 O ��O d�i+o �?N o�J �"'U�' ° � �f����°S'� O s � yrs d dt+ 0,.,�'� to w w 4� �r' �? , et �S` o p O y�� � so��c�� 10�a, ., o�co tom �, ���►d '�.• �4a �j�'' Y,, .s�� °�, 1�,►�' O'fa` N, ^� iy .4 `� �Od Or. '� t. � �`O Sp4 Q©$ �' `° G D W �!"' U �.��co\\• �'►ea 4n 10K r v o�• as r,?°y0�;. a .�► W a VA vft ,� > .s 1 v ,�' �, •> d s .� 1' '�' ��'s 0 �`�os a� o s s s o � o �` • Baas e° A.,���, e��©� s s� os so a s� rF, a y� '�`' � `o o � .� h %� o +? 1�� o'� � a ° �' �, s�, 010 o oo . ` �c,'`��, ,� �0r� �• "'' �`�' o a°,�. s� ao IC ?4 \eo o It Oe °A,. 0", 9\.., SO ' ° ` ° <�,� oA. i Al � 'ecr � 00 a�a ���� *e,�,,j�0•,1� OHO OOS'ec0 O, ° Ov�Oel 0 O 0. ec ck ,>0 p + o ��, s et 1'0" eco :°o�� 00 �'+ �,cow • �. Q4 0 t; e• 0 0 4ti `A cw- $ 'a s o,, VA, A, A�" the part?es ' a T LESSOR /J /� 1p LESSEE --.,P o. C a Co DEC 2 6 1975 Leonard B. Picolet lit. dame �N. Boggess ar o ' erv_sors ATTEW: J.R. OL,SSON, County Clerk and ex officio ..,.nla Picolet S- .Z.:7t 1i.3.MCi ri '�.•�:'� of L � ��.:ii� Ue�c:t:g C?erk - V-MW -1- Muuatilmed with board o@er L-A3E (Contra Costa Co,-=,:nity Gardens Project) General Conditions 1. Occupation. Leasee shall be given ir-..Mediate possession of the demised premises. 2. Termination. This contract may be ter-ainsted by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day written notice thereof to the other. 3. Use. The real property herin leased shall be used for the plantin.:,, cultivating, irri,sti—, €;rowan-, tendin- , fertilizing, and harvesting; of vegetable crops, i ncludin,, application of herbi- cides, pesticides, and fuZ;icides and composting. 4. Toolbox. Lessee may erect a toolbox for stora6e of shovel's, rakes, hoes, cultivators, hoses an other tools normally used in connection with the activities mentioned in section 3. 5. Waste. Lessee shall not commit, or permit others to commit, on the premises, mater, or a nuisance, or any other act that could disturb the L;uiet enjoyment of Lessor on reserved or adjacent property. 5. Hold Harmless. Lessee eZrees to save, indermify and hold harmless Lessor from all liability and claims for damages arising from or connected with Lessee's use maintenance, or operation of the leased premises hereunder. 7. Insurance. Lessee ae;rees to take out and keep in force during the term of this Lease at its own expense public liability insurance covering and insuring all parties hereto, includin., the naming, of the Lessor as an additional insured, against any accidents or injuries to person or property arisin4 or occurinb in or about the demised premises it the minimum sum of ,250,000 for any one person injured, J500,000 for any one accident, and 4100,0UU for property damage. W S. Assig-ru"nent and 'Sublease. Lessee agrees not to assign this Lease or sublease the premises without first obtainin,, the written consent of the Lessor. 9. Successors. This Lease shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns of Lessor. 10, Voti.ces. All Notices desired or req!aired to be given shall be ,,iiren in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage L•repald. ?notices to the Les-tee shall be addressed to Contra Costa County, Office of Economic opportunity, 2157 Thompson Street, Martinez, California 94553. kotices to the Lessor shall be addressed to the Lessor's address desij.�mated herein. The effective date of notice shall b~ the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 11. Lessee agrees to abate property in accordance with abatement laws Part 2,7 and Part S, Division 12, California State health and Safety Code, and pursuant to County Ordinance. 00439 I IN TAB BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA C0UNT`r9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Appeal of Phoenix Properties, Inc. from Action of the Board of December 16, 1975 Appeals on Application No. 2003-75, Orinda Area. Orinda—Lafayette Investors, er. The Board on December 2, 1975 having continued to this date the hearing on the appeal of Phoenix Properties, Inc., from Hoard of Appeals denial of Application No. L.U.P. 2003-75 for approval of site plan and elevations with certain variances, Orinda area, to allow staff and property owners an opportunity to reach an equitable solution with respect to required road improvements; and Mr. Gunther Boccius of the Planning Department staff having stated that considerable progress had been made in resolving the problems, and having requested that the hearing be continued for an additional week to allow time for further review of the matter; and Mr. Dana Murdock, attorney for the applicant, having advised that the one week delay was acceptable; and Mr. J. M. Harb, President of the Orinda Association, having stated that one week was not sufficient time for the Association to review the proposal and formulate a recommendation thereon; and Mr. M. T. Cory, Vice Mayor of the Torn of Moraga, having advised that the Town Council would also like an opportunity to review the proposal but that it would not meet again until the 6th of January, and having urged that the hearing be continued for more than one week; and Supervisor J. P. Benny having moved that the hearing be continued for one week and if the matter has not been reso ved, the hearing can again be continued at that time; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that he would second the motion inasmuch as staff had requested the continuation and the matter was close to being resolved; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having requested that representatives of the Orinda Association and the Town of Moraga be included in future meetings; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the appeal of Phoenix Properties, Inc., is continued to December 239 1975 at 11:15 a.m. PASSED by the Board on December 169 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Phoenix Properties, Inc. Witness my hand and the Seal of Orinda-Lafayette Investors the Hoard of Supervisors affixed Director of Planning this 16th day of December, 1975 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, CLERK oil vnn c e , Do y Clerk I;' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California December 16 , 19 75 In the Matter of Contract #20-005-1 with Ht. Diablo Rehabilitation Center To Provide Vocational and Activity Workshop Services for Unemployed and Disabled Individuals IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #20-005-1 with Ht. Diablo Rehabilitation Center for provision of certain vocational services and activity workshop services for unemployed and disabled individuals under Tire XX of the Social Security Act, as amended, for the term October 1, 1975, through September 30, 2976, with a Contract Payment Limit of $91,000, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract. ------------- Passed by the Board on December 16- 1 -------------- I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boord of Attn: Contracts Unit cc: County Administrator affixed this 16th day December P 19 75 County Auditor-Controller �n J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Welfare Director By Deputy Clerk H 24 '12,7+To� r Icor MSX ne . Netifd 00441 II I. Contra Cos-.i County Standard Form S-:JDARD CONTRA:.e (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number 20 - 005 - 1 Depar traent: Social Service Subject: Vocational Services and Activity Workshop Services (Enploy•ment/Education/Training, and Services for DisabLed Individuals) 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: MIT. DIABLO REHABILITATION CENTER ' Capacity: Non-profit California corporation Address: 490 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is October I, 1975, and it terminates Senrember 30. 1976. unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Pa ent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S 91,000 S. County's Obligations. Couwt-y shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the teras and conditions contained or incorporated herein. S. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval docs.-cents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Title MK - Proposed County Comprehensive Annual Services Program Plan, October 1, 1975 - June 30, 1976, and any revisions or modifications thereto 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Title MK of the Federal Social Secutiry Act, as amended (P.L. 96-647) ; California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONT COSTA, CAUViNIA CONTRACTOR l W. N. BoggessBy GB Chairman, Board of Su ors DEC lb 1975 Attest: J. K. Olsson, County Clerk Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By State of California ) ss. Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1230.1) Reco riended by Department The person signing above for Contractor �' known to me in those individual and �.' .. business capacities, personally appeared BY Fl(1� ' Ii before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved. County Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. Dated: �, If 7 J By _ 14.— Beputy 4 Microfilmed with beard order neat -j 'oun r-,f Clerk s con t_a s;a County Standard Form PROVIS!ONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Humber. 2 0 — 0 0 5 4 i 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in j excess of the total aroant specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total pay,;ent to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. t 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost P.eport and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will Day Contractor: E Check one alternative only.] ] a. $ monthly, or CX] b. $16.74 &_IZ.00Per unit. as defined in the Service Plan, or ] c. An amount Equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program. Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. r 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: ECneck one alternative only.] E X] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular MC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost), and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or L ] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regar3ing acc=nring guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allawable costs.• Payment Demands. Contractor shall subm: written demands monthly for payment a=co_dance with Paragraph 2. (Payment amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on :.ouazy Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and foram prescribed by County. Contractor shall s,.:m t said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from t::e end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval-of saic payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made o., his designee, County will awake monthly payments ass specified in Paragraan 2. (Pa:"'_-n-r Amounts) above. Initials: ooo* Contractor Cotmty -ept. ,.,.,,. gig Contra Costa Count-; Standard For= t t (Cost Basis Contracts) Number — 0 0 5 r-1 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, cork or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days follo,;ing the termination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, shorting the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Pian. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no even later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) showthat the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actual.y been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the pay=ments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Excentions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: 020,467 Contractor County Dept. VU1U1i� (A-4b16 REEV 6/75) _Y_ � t� Contra .a Counry Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase o: Services) C� Number 2 0 — 0 0 t) — l 1. Compliance With Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local lags and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. detention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three Sears from the date of submission of Contractor's final Dayment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representctives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its ,obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 5. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a Written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sum of coney to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. n. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative a.:endment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States: approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 00 ini id_;: ^.O^.`racror Coc_;tty Dear. -f a County Standard Form G Z?AL CONDITIONS (?urchase of Services) ?lumber 2 0 - 00 ,5 — 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the nearing, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is :.lade or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. 2:o Waiver by Countv. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating, the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies With the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said perfor°ance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby Estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Hoard of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. lo. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing' body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided thein, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential., and will not be open to examination for any purpose no* directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and manners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: Contractor Court Dept- W446 0. Ha '•id Contra Ccs-,a Countv Staadard Form. GENERAL CONDITIONS (°urchase of Sgt►YZces) (� �i Number ' 0 ! 0 0 5 — S x3 18. Nandiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification= thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a polictf a^ Dolicies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the Cotmty with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty'(30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head o; the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions wlhieh expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any terra of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor CoDept. W447 (A-4-_; 1 5/75) -3- SYECL-IL CONDITIONS Number 2 0 - O f) 5 1. CosPliance with Federal and State Requirements. Without any limitation upon its oblit ations tinoAv- pZr-Af r^ % 1* --i rh 1---) T%-Q 1 of rh r 1 . 1 superseae fienejL,41 6uuulilc ...., U.— a_. . limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor bo-umtty Dept. W447 (a-46ji E7 5/75) -3- SPECM CMIMITIONS Kumber 2 0 005 1. Compliance with Federal and State Requirements. Without any limitation upon its obligations under Paragraph 1. (Compliance with Law), page 1, of the General Conditioas, Contractor shall comply with all Federal and State regulations, circulars, orders, guidelines, and directives, pursuant hereto, including Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter II, Part 228, under Title XX of the Federal Social Security Atc, as amended, and California's Comprehensive annual Services Program Plan, Title XX, October 1, 1973 — June 30, 1976, with respect to "Employment/Education/Training" and "Services to Disabled Individuals." 2. Source of Funds. This Contract is funded under Title XX of the Social Security Act by a combination of County crony (252) and federal social services funds (752) allocated to the County by the State of California. The County provides. the local matching share for contract costs and receives reimbursement for the federal share from the State as follows: County matching funds -(25X) $ 22,750 Federal funds (75X) 68,250 Total (Contract Payment Limit) $ 91,000 County guarantees that the County share of funding for this Contract does not consist of Federal funds. 3. Preference in Training and Employment. Contractor shall give preference to the training and employment of public assistance recipients, when appropriate and required by applicable State or Federal laws or regulations. 4. No Implication of Contract Renewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation or implication whatsoever that this Contract shall be renewed; i.e., that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract or other such agreement following termination of the within Contract. Initials: Contractor Coantk Dept. LR)`2Y0 s SERVICE PLAN Plumber .. 0 0 5 ' 1. Service. Under this Contract. Contractor shall render for County certain administration and staff services to provide: a. Vocational Services. This service includes but is not limited to: (1) work evaluation (including job sample evaluation and vocational, educational, social, and psychological diagnostic assess--tints) to determine the potential of unc'mployed and disabled individuals for vocational rehabilitation, education, training, or employ^ent; (2) work adjustment and trade training; (3) employment preparation, job development, and job placement; and (4) specialized guidance, counseling, and referral services, to help such clients obtain appropriate rehabilitation, education, training, or emplo=e t and thereby improve their ability to become self-supporting. T'ne estimated average duration of services for an enrollee will be 12 weeks. b. Activity Workshop Services. This service includes full-time supervision and individually designed, developmental activities comprised of skill training and work experiences, individual and group counseling for handling personal problems and physical handicaps, instruction in basic and remedial education, and vocational rehabilitation, and training for better grooming, self-care, social adjustment, and home-management, for disabled individuals who have a limited potential for gainful employment to enable them to maintain and improve their ability to function independently in the family and community, to participate in employment and training activities, and to be self-sufficient. The estimated average duration of services for an enrollee will be 5 to 12 manths, depending on the individual's need for services. 2. Program Administration. Contractor shall administer the above services to serve approximately 30 full-time equivalent enrollees each month, as follows: a. Vocational Services Program. Contractor will: (1) Provide a professionally supervised and staffed program of vocational services in a workshop setting. (2) Provide County with periodic enrollee progress reports at least every 2 months giving professional assessments of each enrollee's potential for or achievement toward vocational rehabilitation, education, training, or employment, identifying the capacity of the enrollee to assume a competitive work role and the particular ski_Zs and behaviors which, if undeveloped or unmodified, would prevent the enrollee from succeeding in competitive employment. (3) Provide services for approximately 15 full-time equivalent enrollees each month, not including persons enrolled in the Activit:: Workshop Program. b. activity Workshop Program. Contractor will: (1) Provide a professionally supervised and staffed program of activity workshop services. (2) Provide County with periodic enrollee progress reports at least every 3 manths giving professional assessments of each enrollee's potential to function independently, to participate in ergloyment and training activities, and to be self-sufficient. (3) Provide services for approximately 15 full-time equivalent enrollees each mouth, not including persons enrolled in the Vocational Services Program. Initials: Contractor County Dept. W �9 SERVICE PLM Number c. Enrollee Eligibility. Services under this Contract shall only be provided to persons who meet all of the following eligibility requirements; i.e. , each enrollee must be: (1) Referred and certified as being eligible for receipt of services, by written authorization from County, prior to service delivery and for a specified period, showing the beginning and ending dates of service eligibility, anti (2) Age 16 or over (as required by Contractor's enrollment standards). County shall pay Contractor for authorized services to eligible enrollees as herein provided for that period of service eligibility which is authorized by County for each such enrollee or until such time as County notifies Contractor of a cessation of eligibility, if an enrollee's eligibility is terminated sooner. d. General Operations. In the operation of these service programs, Contractor shall: (1) Secure and maintain appropriate facility space and equipment, including but not limited to, industrial workshop equipment and tools, office and clerical equipment and supplies, and diagnostic testing equipment and materials, and employ qualified and professional staff sufficient to provide the full range of services specified herein. (2) Provide necessary information as required by the County for County's recertification of each enrollee's eligibility for receipt of services. (3) Provide County with periodic information (reports, evaluations, and/or diagnostic assessments) regarding enrollees in the time and manner prescribed by County, including, but not limited to, a program activity report summarizing all services provided, an enrollee progress report showing the status and progress of each enrollee in the respective service programs, and an enrollee attendance report, showing the daily attendance of each enrollee in the service programs. (4) Keep records on each enrollee which will include eligibility and certi- fication information provided by County, health and safety information, services provided, program results obtained, and daily attendance with dates for enrollees beginning and terminating service under this Contract. (S) Advise the County promptly if any enrollee served under this Contract discontinues participation or enrollment in Contractor's service programs. (6) Notify the County immediately, should Contractor exercise the right to terminate any enrollee from services. (7) Advise enrollees under this Contract who are dissatisfied with any action taken by Contractor of their right to present grievances with respect to the provision of services hereunder, and develop a fair hearing system whereby enrollees may present such grievances. (8) Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and municipal regulations and ordinances governing health and safety. (9) Utilize for the provision of services under this Contract, but not be limited to, the workshop facilities located at: (a) 2200 Fright Avenue, Richmond, (b) 240 South 6th Street, Richmond, and (c) 490 Golf Club Road, Pleasant Hill. _ Contractor shall notify County of the use of any additional facilities. Initials: r _ - 91 Contractor Coun r Dept. 00456 SERVICE PL�Uf Yuaber 20 - 005 (10) Comply with all State licensing standards, all applicable accrediting standards, and any other standards or criteria established by the State to assure quality of services. The Contractor shall maintain the appropriate license and/or accreditation throughout the term of this Contract and provide County with valid documentation of such licensing and accreditation. (11) Provide staff orientation and in-service training in order to maintain and continuously improve the professional competance of program staff and the quality of services, and provide County with such reports on training activities as may be requested by County. 3. Unit Pavment Rates. In accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts), page 1, of the Pavment Provisions, one unit of service for payment purposes shall be defined as either: a. Vocational Services: At feast 5 hours of program services for one enrollee in one weekday, and such unit is payable at $16.74 per enrollee per day, or b. Activitv Workshop Senvices: At least 4 hours of program services for one enrollee in one weekday, and such unit is payable at $7.00 per enrollee per day. Contractor hereby certifies and attests that these payment rates are specifically established and set by the State Department of Rehabilitation and the State Department of Health for Contractor's services. 4. Unit Rate Pavment Limit. County's total payment to Contractor under this Contract, pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) and Paragraph 7. (Audits), page 2, of the Payment Provisions, shall in no event exceed the -fixed unit payment rates specified above or the allowable costs that have actually been incurred, whichever is less. 5. Conformitv with Federal Cost Regulations. In accordance with and subject to Paragraph 3. (Allowable Costs), page 1, of the Payment Provisions, Contractor's allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with "OASC-5, A Guide For Yon-Profit Institutions--Cost Principles and Procedures for Establishing Indirect Cost Rates for Grants and Contracts with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare," a document issued by the U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare for use in implementing the U. S. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-87 (which is supe ceded by the General Services Administration Federal Management Circular FMC 74-4). 6. audit Report. On or before November 30, 1976, or as otherwise authorized by County, Contractor shall provide County with an audit report, prepared by an independent Certified Public Accountant, verifying Contractor's cost report submitted =der Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement), page 2, of the Payment Provisions. Said audit shall be performed in accordance with generally accepted audit standards, including the "Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, :activities, and Functions" (issued by the U. S. Comptroller General, 1972, 54 pp.). Ore thousand dollars ($1,000) of the Contract Payment Limit shall be budgeted by Contractor to procure said audit report. Initials: Contractor Cot:nty Dept. 00451 NMI -3- n s And the Board adjourns to meet. on lc 0B3 / 7S- at Aiy , in the Board Chambers, Room 10?, Administration Building, Martinez, California. W. N. Boggess, Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Deputy O(1►A 9 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF C014TRA COSTA COUNTY, DECEMBER 16, 1975, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for PArshals - Delta. 'Flt. Diablo, Richmond, Walnut Creek-Danville, and Fest Judicial Districts; Planning, Probation, Auditor, Clerk of the Board, Health and Sheriff-Coroner; and authorized appointment of S. Kelly to class of Physical Therapist at the second step. Approved appropriation adjustments not affecting totals for Public Works, Auditor, and Office of Emergency Services. Accepted gift of 5200 from Gemco Foundation for Probation Department. Authorized special board rate for placement of child in home of 0. Manning and placement of ward of the court at Sunny_ Bills. 3 Authorized payment for various utilities for Discovery Motivational House at 4639 Pacheco Boulevard, Fartirez, and referred to Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Linscheid and Kenny) for the recommendation of Director, human Resources Agency, that the Board authorize Real Property Division to negotiate for lease of said residence. Authorized Director, :Human Resources Agency, to execute fee-for-service contract with physician for Medical Services. Recessed to meet in Executive Session at 2:50 p.m. to discuss a personnel matter. Denied portion of claim timely filed by M. Bernstine. Authorized increase of petty cash fund for County Service Area R-6, Orinda. Authorized the Office of the County Counsel to accept service on behalf of the County of a Summons and Complaint in the case of the City of Lafayette vs. The County of Contra Costa, Superior Court Action No. 159388. Fixed Dec. 23 at 10:45 a.m. as time for hearing re use of proposed logo on county stationery. Appointed following persons to County Fire Frotection Districts as indicated for four-year terms ending December 31. 1979: Bethel Island - T. Burrett Oakley - E. Baldocchi Byron - S. Pereira Riverview - Fx. Whatley Eastern - E. Hangini Contra Costa - H. Tildes Reappointed W. Treanor to the County Civil Service Commission for a four-year term ending Jan. 15, 1980; and appointed C. Van Harter as this county's represen- tative on an 11-member steering committee of the "Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency". Adopted Ordinance No. 75-52 amending Code providing for reimbursement of vaca- tion credits for management employees, subject to certain conditions. Waived reading and fixed Dec. 23 as time for adoption of proposed ordinance repealing Section of Code which mandates certain animal control procedures for non-contracting cities; waived reading and fixed Jan. 13. 1976 at 10:3.7 a.m. as time for public hearing on proposed ordinances adopting the 1975 national Electric Code by reference and changing the present fee schedule of the 1973 Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical codes. Fixed Jan. 13. 1976 at 10:45 a.m. as time for hearing on proposed rezoning of land in the Alamo (1968-RZ) and Orinda (1972-RZ) areas; and fixed Jan. 13 at 10:50 a.m. as time for hearing on proposed rezoning of land in San Ramon area (1914-RZ). 00453 December 16, 1975 Summary, continued _ ° Page 2 Authorized Chairman to execute the fallowing: Lease with L. and A. Picolet for use of property in West Pittsburg by UPSPROUT Community Gardens Protect; Agreement with Lawrie Development Conrany for installation and completion of private improvements in MS 09-75, Alarm/Danville area; Contract Anendrent Arreerent with State Department of Health for operation .f County Alcoholism Prof-.-aa T_nfornation and :valuation System Project to revise budget; Agreement Amendrent with State Departr.-ent of health to extend County health Departnent Geriatric Screeninr, Project; Contract with X. Gearhart, Ph.D., for training !fental Health staff in Alconolism; Arreement with City of Richmond for reimbursement of services provided to Control of Major Offenders in Burriary and Related Offenses Project; Contract with Mt. Diablo Rehabilitatien Center for vocational and activity workshor services for unemployed and d!.-tabled individuals. Fixed Feb. 3 at 1n:30 a.m. for hearir_r_ n. request to sell surplus property within Assessment District 1073-t (Danville Off-Street Parking). Deferred to Jan. 13 at 1P:r5 a.n. decision on administrative appeal of M. Levine with respect to LUP 2010-75, Lafayette area. Authorized.;.Nblic Forks Director to execute :.and Use AF,z-eecent with G. Dodd, D.7.". , for rental of vaunt County rroperty on San Pa.:-on Valley Boulevard; and agreement with Peter Kaldveer and Arsec_ates for fcundation investi,.ations of rarsh Creek Road Z_)riaCe, Clayton area, -and Park Avenue Bridge on 'c'ildcat Creek, Richmond area. Approved action taken by Public "orks Director with respect to partial closure of Sobrante Avenue, Z'1 Sobrante area. Declared as complete street and drainage trnproverents in Sub. 4446, Brentwood area, and authorized Public Works Director to refund deposit in connection therewith. Accepted deed from Dr. C. Ward in connection with LU? 2055-74, Danville area. Acknowledged receipt of report on review of unsentenced prisoner population in County Jails. Deferred to Dec. 23 at 11:11 a.--%. decision on apceal of J. Halverson from action of the Planning Co=ission in connection with Sub. 4E10, :anville area. Authorized Director, human ?resources Agency, to negotiate a contract with Richmond Welfare Rights Organization for continued distribution of foot: vouchers under Vomen, Infants and Children Nutrition ?ro.s;ran. Acknowledged receipt of merorandu^ report of County Adrinistrator with respect to 1975 Summer Program for £conn ically Disadvantaged Youth. Referred to: Administration and Finance Committee, County Administrator and County Counsel request of Mt. Diablo Unified School District that icvroved legal services be provided by County Counsel; County Administrator reco-.r..endat±on of Cor=unity Development Advisory Council that housing Rehabilitation and Code Znfo=cenent Prograr. be undertaken initially in target areas In North R!chrand and zest Fittstsrg; Public Forks Director re--est of California-=:ational Air Services Inc. for ground lease at Buchanan rleld; and letter from Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors urgint; support for enactment of federal _eg:s_at_on which would provide flexibility in use of federal gas Lax revenues.* Park and Recreation Facilities .advisory Committee recommendation of Citizens Advisory Committee for CSA a-! t^at $13,000 in Park Dedication Trust Funds to utilized for acquiring certain prcrerty; Director of Personnel request of G. votta for approval of State Disability Insurance prograr for County e-ployees; Director of Planning letter from D. Martindale commenting on environmental impact of proposed Dox Chemical Company plant; Human Resources CO_=Ittee (Supervisors Moriarty and Dias) recommendations of Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board for appointment to same; 00454 December 16, 1975 Summary, continued Page 3 1976 Government Operations Committee, County Administrator and County Counsel request of County Retired Fmployees Association Chapter for cost-of-living increase for retired employees; request to review the procedure for nominating members to the County Aviation Liaison Committee; Administration and Finance Committee request of Director, Human Resources Agency, for authorization to utilize a Social Service staff member for legislative liaison work during the 1976 session of State Legislature. Requested County Counsel, County Administrator and the Registrar of Voters to advise the Board as to available options concerning the initiative petition cur- tailing construction of proposed county jail. Directed that the County Administrator and the County Sheriff-Coroner prepare a report stating this county's ability to comply by Jan. 1, 1979 with requirements of Penal Code Section 4029 pertaining to equal availability of facilities, programs, services and privileges to male and female inmates for submittal to the Legislature. Authorized County Auditor to correct certain erroneous assessments. Authorized payment to J. Brennan et al and accepted deed in connection with property acquisition, Diablo Road, Danville area. As P_c Officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorized payment to C. Cooper et ux and accepted deed in connection with property acquisition, Lines E and E-1, Brentwood area. Granted extension of time in which to file the final map for Sub. 4659, Danville area. Awarded contract to Sal Cola Construction Company for storage addition to Edgar Childrens' Shelter, Farrtinez. Approved relocation of drainage facilities at Silverwood Court, Orinda area, and authorized necessary restoration work. Authorized Public Works Director to execute deferred improvement agreements with: G. Dodd, LUP 324-72, San Ramon area, and J. and J. Lessner, Development Permit 3034-75, Danville area; and accepted Grant Deed from J. and J. Lessner for additional right of way along Hartz Avenue. Accepted Grant Deeds from S. Langford 04S 99-75) and C. Harris et al (San Ramon Valley Boulevard). Adopted the following numbered resolutions: 75/1012, declaring intention to advertise and sell a franchise for pipelines in county highways (Oakley area) and fixed Jan. 20, 1976 at 11 a.m. as time for receiving bids on same; 75/1013, approving map and Subdivision Agreement for Sub. 4650 and accepting drainage release from Boise Cascade Corporation for same; 75/1014, approving Supplement No. 3 to Local Agency-State Agreement No. I for a Federal-Aid Railway-Highway Grade Crossing Improvement and authorizing Chairman to execute same; 75/1015, approving annexation No. 75-11 (Sycamore Square Shopping Center and Sub. 4406), Danville area, to CSA L-45; 75/1016, approving Allview, Pinole area, annexation to CSA LIB 10; 75/1017, approving Oak Ynoll Road annexation (EI Sobrante area) to CSA L-41; 75/1018 through 75/3'025, authorizing changes of assessment roll; 75/1026, rescinding Resolu;.ior. o. 75/?82 relating to transfer of tax Lien to the 1975-76 unsecured roll; 75/1027 through 75/1028, cancelling of tax liens on property acquired by Public Agencies and on transfer to unsecured roll of sa^e; 75/1030, authorizing Chairman to submit Application for Grant for county study program for female offenders to OCJP; 75/1031, approving change of nacre of an eylsting portion of Coggins Lane and a new portion of roadway known as Oak Road Extension, Pleasant Hill area, to Coggins Drive; 00455 December 16, 1975 Summary, continued Page 4 75/1032, amending Resolution No. 75/523 to add Oakhaven Academy Group Home to approved list of child care institutions; 75/1033, adopting Seismic Safety Element of the County General Plan; 75/1034, adopting continuing provision of uniform allowance to certain emploveea in the Office of Sheriff-Coroner and Marshals Offices; 75/1035, accepting as complete cor tn.r•tf area, retaining ca-h ^ir . j- - aip 6.Lme for map and Subdivision Agreement for Sub. 4650 and accepting drainage release from Boise Cascade Corporation for same; 75/1014, approving Supplement No. 3 to Local Agency-State Agreement No. l for a Federal-Aid Railway-Highway Grade Crossing Improvement and authorizing Chairman to execute same; 75/1015, approving annexation No. 75-11 (Sycamore Square Shopping Center and Sub. 4406), Danville area. to CSA L-45; 75/1016, approving Allview, Pinole area, annexation to CSA LIB 10; 75/1017, approving Oak iLnol3 Road annexation (EZ Sobrante area) to CSA L-41; 75/1018 through 75/1025, authorizing changes of assessment roll; 75/1026, rescinding Resolution No. 75/°82 relating to transfer of tax lien to the 1975-76 unsecured roll; 75/1027 through 75/1028, cancelling of tax liens on property acquired by Public Agencies and on transfer to unsecured roll of same; ' 75/1030, authorizing Chairman to submit Application for Grant for county study program for female offenders to OCJP; 75/1031, approving change of name of an existing portion of Coggins Lane and a new portion of roadway known as Oak Road Extension, Pleasant Hill area, to Coggins Drive; 00455 December 16, 1975 Summary, continued Page 4 75/1032, amending Resolution No. 75/523 to add Oakhaven Academy Group Home to approved list of child care institutions; 75/1033. adopting Seismic Safety Element of the County General Plan; 75/1034, adopting continuing provision of uniform allowance to certain employees in the Office of Sheriff-Coroner and Marshals Offices; 75/1035, accepting as complete construction improvements, Sub. 4506, 'Walnut Creek area, retaining cash surety deposit for one year, and declaring Candelero Drive, ! Candelero Court, Candelero Place, and Treat Boulevard Widening as county roads; 75/1036, accepting as complete contract with ualpass Construction Co., Inc. for construction of Multi-Use Building at Juvenile Hall Complex, Martinez area; 75/1037, authorizing establishment of flextime employee work scheduling plans on a trial basis upon approval of the appointing authority and the County Admin- istrator. 75/1029 abandoning portion of garner Road, Oakley area, and continued to Dec. 14, 1971 hearing on proposed abandonment of Del Porto Road, Oakley area. Authorized Chairman to execute contract with State for Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Project. Continued to Dec. 23 at 11:15 a.m. hearing on appeal of Phoenix Properties, Inc. from Board of Appeals denial of Application :To. "003-75 for approval of site plan and elevations with certain variances, Orinda area. Authorized legal defense for persons who have so requested in connection with Superior Court Actions Nos. 159347. 159422, 154237, 159159 and 157450. Authorized letters sent to Federal Legislators in support of legislation to continue the Emergency Medical Services Act. 0.0455 r The preceding documents consist of 456 pages. A