HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08201985 - 2.1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
�-� Contra
FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus �•
Director of Community Development Costa
DATE: July 29, 1985
l
County
SUBJECT: Appeal of the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association Subdivision 6443, Alhambra Valley
area (Deadhorse Ranch)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt findings for approval for Subdivision 6443, as set forth in Exhibit A, and approve the
Subdivision subject to the conditions as set forth in Exhibit B, both exhibits being attached hereto
and by reference incorporated herein.
BACKGROUND:
The Board, on April 9, 1985, denied the appeal of the Alhambra Valley Improvement Association
from the County Planning Commission's decision approving the tentative map of Subdivision 6443,
D. B. Flett & Associates, Inc. (Applicant) and Deadhorse Ranch Investment Group (Owner) to divide
121 acres in General Agricultural District (A-2) into 17 lots, said property being located
approximately 1,000 feet north of Alhambra Valley Road with access from a private road located
between 5302 and 5324 Alhambra Valley Road, approximately 3,250 feet west of Reliez Valley Road,
in the Alhambra Valley/Martinez area, and directed the Director of Commmunity Development to
prepare for the Board's consideration an order approving Subdivision 6443 and incorporating findings
and conditions agreed upon by all parties.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR EC M NDATI F BOA COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
.ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE O SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT d ) i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: City of Martinez ATTESTED 2 Q.4 // s
Hal Olson PHIL BATCH OR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
D. B. Flett & Assoc. SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
[lead Horse Ranch Inv. Grp.
Thiessen, Gagen & McCoy
(saunty Counsel , Comm. Dev. , Public Wks. , BY DEPUTY
y=y 'Consolidated Fire, Health Dept. , B. Insp.
EXHIBIT A
Findings for Approval of Subdivision 6443
and Negative Declaration :
In approving the tentative map of Subdivision 6443 to divide
121 acres in General Agricultural District (A-2) into 17 lots,
and in denying the appeal of the Alhambra Valley Improvement
Association (c/o Hal Olson) , the Contra Costa Board of
Supervisors finds as follows:
A. Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance .
1. An Initial Study of Environmental Significance was
prepared for this project identifying effects on the environment ,
but revisions in the project agreed to by the applicant avoided
the effects or mitigated them to a point where clearly no
significant effects, cumulative or otherwise, would occur. A
Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was therefore
prepared, which included and referenced revisions in the project
plans as mitigation measures. The proposed conditions of
approval have required further revisions and improvement require-
ments in the project as further mitigation measures.
2. Prior to approving the project, the Board
considered the proposed Negative Declaration, the Initial Study
and Exhibits A and B. all comments received during the public
hearing process and the proposed revisions to the project and the
conditions of approval as recommended by the Contra Costa County
Planning Commission and agreed to by the applicant and other
revisions to conditions on this appeal that were also agreed to
by the applicant. The Board approves the Negative Declaration,
considering the foregoing and all other evidence before it, on
the basis there is no substantial evidence that the project may
have a significant effect on the environment.
3. Changes or alterations have been incorporated in
the project or improvement fees have been required of the project
which mitigate or avoid any significant, cumulative or otherwise,
environmental effects identified in the Initial Study. Such
mitigation is described in the Initial Study and is set forth in
Section IIID of the Planning Department Staff Report dated
October 9, 1984 and is further provided for in the revised
conditions of approval, all incorporated herein by reference as
though set forth at length hereunder , and in particular as
follows:
a. Grading and erosion: The conditions of
approval require in the development of each lot that grading be
minimized, with the use of crib walls where necessary, and the
provision of adequate drainage. An erosion protection plan must
be approved. Prompt revegetation using natural, drought resis-
tant vegetation is required. Streets are to be no more than 20.
feet in width and grading used shall achieve a natural rounded
appearance with the use of crib walls where necessary.
b. Water runoff and siltation: The conditions of
approval require participation in and development of an overall
regional water detention basin and drainage control system.
Water runoff mitigation measures include the construction of a
drop structure as part of the creek crossing.
C. Geology and soils: The conditions of approval
require the minimizing of grading and erosion and , in addition,
the direction of runoff away from unstable areas. It is further
required that the recommendations in a detailed preliminary
geologic and design-level soils report for subdivision
improvements be followed.
-1-
d . Fire hazard : The conditions of approval
require an adequate public water system and tank capacity for
fire protection purposes, specific fire protection measures on
each lot, and contribution toward construction of a new fire
station, equipment and other resources to allow for faster
emergency response. The roads proposed are sufficiently wide for
passage of fire equipment and vehicles.
e. Water supply: The conditions of approval
require public water to be supplied to the . project and use of
leach fields with adequate slope and percolation, consistent with
the standards of the Department of Health, so as to avoid
contamination of other wells in the area.
f. General Plan considerations: The goals and
policies of particular elements of the General Plan, including
but not limited to Open Space Conservation, Scenic Routes, Safety
and Fire Protection Elements, are satisfied given revisions in
the project and the conditions of approval. In addition, the
project is otherwise consistent with the 1982 General Plan
Amendment for the greater Alhambra Valley Area. To avoid the
possibility that cumulative impacts based on future development
may result in inconsistencies with the General Plan, the
applicant has agreed to participate in the funding of an
immediate Specific Plan review of the Alhambra Valley and to
contribute to off-site mitigation measures developed by the
Specific Plan to the extent required in the conditions of
approval.
g. Traffic: This project shall result in an
insignificant increase in traffic along Alhambra Valley Road and
otherwise. The conditions of approval require the construction
of specific improvements along Alhambra Valley Road. Further ,
the applicant will participate in ' other improvements along
Alhambra Valley Road, as may be required by the Specific Plan, to
the extent required under conditions of approval. The Board of
Supervisors concurs with the residents in the Alhambra Valley who
want to retain the present general width of Alhambra Valley Road
consistent with the rural residential character of the area.
4. Given the foregoing , the Board finds that an
environmental impact report is not required for this project and
that the project as revised with the conditions of approval as
revised mitigates all significant impacts:
B. Findings For Approval of Subdivision 6443.
5. The proposed subdivision, together with the provi-
sions for its design and improvement, are consistent with the
General Plan as stated in paragraph 3 (f) , above , and as follows:
a. Each of the lots are 5 acres or more in
size. The site development plans, house plans and elevations,
accessory structures, fences and keeping of horses are subject to
review and approval of the Zoning Administrator to insure
functional and visual compatibility with 'the physical character
and visual images of the Alhambra Valley, consistent with the
General Plan.
b. It will not adversely affect or strain
existing community facilities, including roads and drainage
facilities, in that the proposed project will be making or paying-
for the appropriate improvements as set forth inthe conditions
of approval and as may be required under the Specific Plan
consistent with those conditions. Mitigation measures outlined
above have been agreed to and provided in the project in the
conditions of approval with respect to the goals and policies of
the Open Space Conservation, Scenic Routes, Seismic, Safety, and
-2-
Safety and Fire Protection and other Elements of the General
Plan.
C. The project is consistent with the intent of
the General Plan and in particular the 1982 General Plan
Amendment for the greater Alhambra area, which called for large
lot residential development on properties near Alhambra Valley
Road as a means to preserve the rural residential quality of life
in the Alhambra Valley. By funding and participating in a
Specific Plan study, this project assists in further
implementation of that General Plan Amendment.
6. The design of the project provides, to the extent
feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling
opportunities as specified in the conditions of approval which
require siting of the homes to provide for energy conservation.
7. There is no substantial evidence to deny the
proposed land use as the Board is unable to and does not make any
of the following findings:
a. Proposed map is not consistent with the
applicable general and specific plans (in fact, as set forth
above, the proposed tentative map is consistent with the
applicable General Plan and the applicant will fund and
participate in a Specific Plan study and implementation) .
b. The design or improvement of the proposed
subdivision is not consistent with the applicable General and
Specific Plans. (in fact, as set forth above, the design or
improvement is consistent with the applicable General Plan and
protects the rural residential character of the Alhambra Valley) .
C. This site is not physically suitable for the
type of development (to the contrary, the site plan demonstrates
its physical suitability when developed consistent with the
conditions of approval) .
d. This site is not physically suitable for the
proposed density of development (to the contrary, the site plan
demonstrates the physical suitability of the site for the
proposed density, and, furthermore, the density is less than that
provided for under the applicable zoning and General Plan
designation) .
e. The design of the subdivision or the proposed
improvement is likely to cause substantial environmental damage
or substantial unavoidable injury to fish or wild life or their
habitat (to the contrary, the Negative Declaration with Initial
Study found that any significant environmental effect had been
mitigated by the project and conditions of approval as revised) .
f. The design of the subdivision or type of
improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems
(there is no evidence to support such a concern given that a
public water supply is required, leach fields used must meet
standards of the Department of Health, and significant drainage
improvements must be installed, among other things, pursuant to
the conditions of approval) .
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of
improvements will conflict with easements, required by the public
at large, for access through or use of, property within the pro-
posed subdivision (there are no such public access easements) .
8. The following staff reports are hereby incorporated
by reference as though set forth hereunder as part of these
findings:
-3-
a. The Planning Department Staff Report dated
October 9, 1984.
b. The Planning Department Staff Report dated
November 20, 1984.
C. Public Works Department Staff Report dated
October 4, 1984.
d . Public Works Department Staff Report dated
March 25, 1985.
-4-
1
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT
2010 GEARY ROAD ��a� nisTw PLEASANT HILL; CA 94523-4694
(415)930-5500
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
March 29, 1984
CID =:o
C;
Contra- Costa County 'J
~ V C
Planning Department
P. O. Box 951 R,
Martinez, CA 94553
i
Attn: Dolores Peterson
SUBJECT: Subdivision 6443
Dear Ms. Peterson:
We have reviewed the tentative map to establish a major subdivision in the Martinez
area. The development is to consist of seventeen (17) residential units. This
project is regulated by codes and ordinances administered by this Fire District
relative to Contra Costa County Ordinance 83/44. If approved by your office, the
following shall be included as conditions of approval:
1. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water supply for fire
protection with a minimum fire flow of 1,250 GPM. Required fire flow shall be
delivered from not more than .two hydrants flowing simultaneously while main-
taining .20 pounds residual pressure in the main.
2. The developer shall provide eight (8) hydrants of the East Bay type. Cost of
the installation to be borne by the developer.
3. Provide access roadways with all-weather driving surfaces of not less than 20
feet of unobstructed width, and not less than 13'6" of vertical clearance;
to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of every building.
Access roads shall not exceed 20% grade, shall have a minimum inside turning
radius of 28 feet, and must be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire
apparatus (15 tons) .
4. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet long shall be
provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire department
apparatus.
5. The bridge to the project shall be certified as being capable of supporting
the loads of fire apparatus (15 tons) .
6. Due to response time (in excess of 6 minutes) to the project, built-in fire
protection shall be provided as follows:
a. The developer shall provide -fire-retardant roof coverings 'as defined in
the current edition of the Uniform Building Code.
C.C.C. Planning Dept./Dolores Peterson
RE: Subdivision 6443
March 29, 1984
Page 2
b. The developer shall. provide structures with a residential-.type automatic
fire sprinkler system designed and installed in accordance with the
requirements and guidelines of the Fire District based on NFPA #13D.
C. Prior to issuance� of a building permit for construction, the Fire District
shall review and approve plans and specifications with regard to built-in
fire protection features required.
7. Where open space is to be maintained for public or private 'use, access into
these areas from public ways shall be provided. These access ways shall be
a minimum 16 foot width to accommodate fire department equipment.
The continued access and maintenance of the District' s fire trail system shall
also be insured.
All open spaces, when left in their natural state, shall meet the Fire District's
weed abatement standards. Where practical, we would encourage the use of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Land Management Program utilizing live-
stock grazing. . This would require fencing the properties and allowing
animals to graze to approximately a 25% residual. If this method is not
utilized, mechanical abatement shall be required. Contact Senior Inspector
Emery of this office for minimum weed abatement requirements.
8. With the large size lots, it is anticipated that- the building setback will
require excessively long driveways to the individual dwelling units. To insure
prompt fire department response, we ask that these driveways be a minimum 16'
paved width with minimum 28' inside turning radius and that the dwelling address
be conspicuously posted at the private driveway and access road intersection..
We ask your careful consideration on this matter and that the above requirements
be made conditions of land use permit approval.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
William F. Maxfield
Fire Chief
by: X rF ank J. Boyle
Fire Inspector
WFM/FJB:vw
CC: Martinez Public Works Dept./Mo Sharma, Engineer
Project File
Y Y1
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISION 6443:
1. This approval is based on the revised tentative map received by the Planning
Department on August 24, 1984, for 17 lots with the following conditions.
2. Development rights for other than one single family residence and appurtenant
structures shall be deeded to the County to prevent further subdivision.
3. Development of each lot shall be designed to minimize grading, and homes and
accessory structures designed to have a low profile and/or be screened by vegetation.
Crib walls shall be utilized for driveways and site development on steep sites to
minimize height of cut and fill slopes. Fences shall be of unobtrusive design. All
concentrated storm runoff, subsurface water and swimming pool drainage shall be
conveyed to an erosion resistant drainage facility. A minimum of four (4) on-site
parking spaces shall be provided on each lot. The existing natural drainage patterns
on the individual parcels shall be maintained. Drainage which has been collected
cannot be discharged onto the adjacent property as a concentrated flow. Direct
runoff away from geologically unstable or potentially unstable areas of the site. Site
development plans, house plans and elevations, accessory structures, fences and
keeping of horses shall be subject to review and approval of the Zoning Adminis-
trator. Siting of homes shall be reviewed for energy conservation features. These
criteria shall be included in the CC&Rs for the development. CC&Rs shall be
submitted for review and approval to the Zoning Administrator prior to recording the
Final Map.
4. An architectural review board shall be established by the CC&Rs which shall
establish written criteria specifying the use of subdued colors and finishing materials
for project structures that are compatible with the surrounding landscape.
5. Adequate fencing of an inconspicuous design shall be required to contain domestic
animals with gates to be closeable by a nearby rancher when necessary. Submit
proposed design and color for review and approval fo the Zoning Administrator. The
approved design shall be incoporated in the CC&Rs for the project.
6. Fire retardant roofing and automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed for each
residence subject to review and approval of Fire District. Driveways shall have a
maximum gradient of 20%, with pavement width and turnouts, if necessary, as
approved by the Fire District. Weed abatement and prominent address locations shall
be provided as required by the District. Addresses shall be clearly visible from the
street 24 hours a day. Landscape buffers at least 30 feet wide shall be required
around each residence. If public water supply is available the buffers shall be
irrigated. These requirements shall be incorporated in the CC&Rs for the develop-
ment.
7. Comply with the requirements of the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire District
for water supply, fire hydrants, roadway turnouts, maintenance of the district's fire
trail system, and weed abatement. A copy of the Fire District's letter of March 29,
1984, is attached.
6443 Page 2
The applicant shall pay $17,000 to the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire
Protection District as a pro-rata share of the costs for a new fire station, equipment
and resources to help reduce emergency response time.
8. Water supply serving the properties concerned shall be by the City of Martinez. Each
individual living unit shall be served by a separate water connection. Such water
distribution system located within the boundaries of the properties concerned in this
subdivision shall become an integral part of the City of Martinez water distribution
system. Development of the water system should be coordinated with the developer
of the Stonehurst subdivision and the City of Martinez.
9. Prior to recording the Final Map, submit evidence to the Director of Planning which
indicates that satisfactory arrangements for water service have been made with the
City of Martinez and the Contra Costa County Consolidated Fire Protection District.
10. Prior to recording the Final Map each lot shall have received approval of the Health
Department for an individual sewage disposal system to serve a four bedroom
residence.
11. Grading for roads, driveways, and site development shall be designed to achieve a
natural rounded appearance with 2 to 1 cut and fill slopes minimized. Height of cut
or fill slopes shall be kept low by use of crib walls where necessary. Leach fields
shall not be located upon or adjacent to hazardous soil conditions.
12. Erosion protection shall be a criteria for development of the subdivision improve-
ments. Slopes exposed by grading shall be replanted with native grasses and plant
materials. An erosion protection plan shall be submitted for development of the
subdivision improvements. Plans shall be submitted for review and comment of the
Contra Costa Resources Soil Conservation District and to the County staff for
approval..
13. Prior to recording the Final Map submit three copies of a detailed preliminary
geologic and design-level soil report for subdivision improvements to the Planning
Department. The report recommendations shall be implemented by grading and
improvement plans.
14. Prior to issuance of building or grading permits for each lot, proposed improvements
shall be reviewed by a soils engineer and engineering geologist and a report submitted
with recommendations for grading, drainage, foundations and retaining walls. Infor-
mation from the geologic and soils reports above shall become the basis for site
development engineering geologic and soils reports. An erosion protection plan shall
be submitted with each building permit application. The plan shall be submitted for
review and comment to the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District and for
approval to the County staff.
15. Revegetate exposed soil surfaces after grading using native, drought resistant
vegetation by hydromulching or other suitable technique. Do not allow slopes to
stand unvegetated during the winter rainy season.
6443 Page 3
16. Construct the on-site storm drain system to Contra Costa County standards, in
accordance with recommendations of the soils and geologic consultant including
provision of permanent erosion control features. Control potential erosion during con
struction. Erosion control plans shall be submitted for review and comment to the
Contra Costa Resource Conservation District and for approval to the County staff.
The County staff shall consult with the City of Martinez in reviewing the plans. If
the City of Martinez cannot.accept the approved plans the matter will be referred to
the Planning Commission for resolution.
17.1*. Drainage facilities shall be designed to the satisfaction of County and the consulting
engineering geologist, as evidenced by the geologist's signature on improvement plans
after county review.
18. Prior.to recording the,Final Map the creek crossing and drainage facilities affecting
Arroyo del Hambre Creek shall be subject to 'review and approval of the Department
of Fish do Game, Public Works and the Flood Control District. Design shall be in
accordance with recommendations of a detailed soil and foundation report.
19. An archaeological field reconnaissance report shall be prepared and submitted to the
-Planning Department. This report shall be prepared by a professional archaeologist
who is certified by the Society of California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of
Professional Archaeology (SOPA). Recommendations of the report shall be imple-
mented.
20. Feasibility of an equestrian trail shall be studied for location along one side of the
project streets for use of the project homeowners. The trail should be maintained by
the Homeowner's Association.
21. Construction equipment shall not use Vaca Creek Road and Vaca Creek Way. An
adequate creek crossing shall be constructed for use of construction equipment.
When the access road has been constructed the developer shall abandon his right of
access over Vaca Creek Road and Way.
22. , Street names for the project streets shall be submitted to the Director of Planning
for approval.
X •'
23. During preparation of the improvement pfans the road alignment at the 12 foot high
retaining wall along theyoad located between lots 12 and 16 shall be given special
study to decrease the wall height.
., .._ .. "
-'.-24. 1 Comply with the require ne is of the Public Works Department as follows
_
A. In accordance with Section 92-2.006 of the County Ordinance Code, this
subdivision shall conform to the provisions of the County Subdivision
Ordinance (Title 9) . :.
B. The following exception to Title 9 is permitted for this subdivision:
1. Section 914-2.006, "Surface Water Flowing from Subdivision," for
sub-watersheds A. C and 0 (as shown on Figure 4 of memorandum from
Geoffrey L. Casburn, P.E. to Mr. Robert Gertz, Subject: "Deadhorse
Ranch Drainage Study - Revised", dated April 30, 1984) provided
the applicant maintains the existing drainage pattern and does not
dispose concentrated storm waters onto adjacent properties.
6443 Page 4
C. The access road which extends from Alhambra Valley Road to the westerly
property line, as shown on the Tentative Map, shall be constructed as a
20-foot paved road within a 40-foot private access easement and shall
be aligned with the road system of Subdivision 6487. The remaining
roads of the Subdivision shall be 20-foot paved roads within 30-foot
private access easements.
D. Construct the access and interior roads, described above, to County
public road standards for minor streets with the exception of the
pavement width requirements.
E. Install signage on the private road system to restrict parking on both
sides of the roads. The number and location of these signs shall be
subject to the approval of the Public Works Department.
F. Establish a mechanism for the perpetual maintenance of the interior
private road system subject to the approval of the Public Works
Department.
G. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division,
that legal access to the property is available from Alhambra Valley Road.
H. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division,
of the acquisition of all necessary rights of entry, permits and/or
easements for the construction of off-site, temporary or permanent,
road and drainage improvements.
I. Construct off-site drainage improvements as approved by the Public
Works Department,
OR, at the developers option,
Contribute to the County Drainage Deficiency Fee Trust (Fund
.812100-0800) --designated for Zone 5 the equivalent of $0.25 per
.square foot of added impervious surface area. An average of 10,690
feet of impervious surface area per parcel will be used for this purpose.
J. Mitigate traffic impacts of this development by:
1.'� '' Trimming vegetation to
. g back etation g improve sight distance at the following
locations:
a. Southwest corner of Corte De La Canada and Alhambra Valley
Road.
b. Along the north side of Alhambra Valley Road for Westbound
driver visibility of the curve warning and speed limit signs
east of Corte De La Canada.
C. Along the south side of Alhambra Valley Road for eastbound
drivers approaching the T-intersection sign west f Rel iez
Valley Road intersection.
6443 Page S
d. Along the north side of Alhambra Valley Road east of Briones
Road to improve visibility_of the Briones Park sign.
e. Along the north side of Alhambra Valley Road immediately to
the west of the project access road.
2. Replacing missing raised reflective pavement markers along the
existing center line striping between the projects access road and
the intersection of Alhambra Valley Road and Reliez Valley Road.
3. Constructing gravel shoulder improvements on Alhambra Valley Road
between the development and the intersection of Alhambra Valley
Road with Reliez Valley Road in order to eliminate any drop-offs
between the pavement and the shoulder.
4. Installing a street name sign for .the development entrance road
which is clearly visible to drivers approaching from both directions
along Alhambra Valley Road.
5. Providing 20-foot turning radii to facilitate turning to and from
the project access road at Alhambra Valley Road.
6. Positioning the cluster of mailboxes so' as not to restrict sight
distance for drivers entering Alhambra Valley Road from the
development.
K. The developer shall work with the developer of Subdivision 6487 to the
west in planning for a road connecting the projects and shall submit
plans, satisfactory to the Public Works Department, that demonstrate
the feasibility of such a road.
L. The creek crossing shall be constructed with a drop structure. The
drop structure should be in a dedicated drainage easement. Full credit
against the drainage fee shall be allowed for .the drop structure.
M. Convey to the County, by Offer of Dedication, a drainage easement of
sufficient size to encompass the drop structure and access required for
its maintenance. : . .
N. Improvement plans for storm drainage and traffic related items shall be
subject to review by the City of Martinez.
0. Contribute $1,000 per lot to the County within 90 days of the Board of
Supervisor's action on the appeal to provide partial financing of a
Specific Plan for Alhambra Valley. _
- - 6443 Page 6
P. Contribute $17,000 per lot as the developments fair share of the area's
infrastructure needs. Full credit towards this contribution will be
allowed for the following:
1. Fire Facilities Contributions
2. Park Dedication Fee (City and County)
3. ..- .Road Improvements/Contributions (City and County)
4. Drainage Mitigation Contribution/Improvements
_.------- ._. 5. Specific Plan Contribution
` 6. ^D_o-m- tic Water Supply (pump stations, reservoirs, and mains to reservoirs). —
.� Whether any other domestic water supply construction costs will be considered
t as part of the Specific Plan area's infrastructure costs will be determined as part
of the Specific Plan review and determination process.
If the developer's costs of construction of Specific Plan infrastructure. improve-
ments are less than $17,000 per lot, then the balance shall be paid into an
interest bearing trust account for Specific Plan infrastructure improvements to
be established by the County. Payment must be made when so directed by the
Public Works Department. If the final determination for infrastructure costs per
lot under the Specific Plan is less than $17,000, then the developer shall receive
l a credit for cash contributions to the trust fund, which reflect the difference
between $17,000 and the final determination of infrastructure costs per lot, with
accrued interest. If the developer's construction costs for infrastructure
improvements exceed $17,000 per lot, and there is no cash contribution to the
infrastructure trust fund, then no reimbursement will be provided to the
1 developer.
DP'ed/plp9asub 10/3/84
__i l/16/84 '
.-'r-11/30/84
;.-1/11/85
...3:Revised
7/29/85 -r _