Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11031954 - BOX1 In The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County,' State of California Wednesd-ayj---11fovembc-r---3.... 195--- In the Matter of Map of Contra Costa County pre- pared by Joseph W. Barkleyq County Surveyor. A new County map dated November 39 1954 prepared by Joseph W. Barkley] County 'Surveyor, is presented to this Board; and On motion of Supervisor Taylor, seconded by Supervisor Frederickson, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said map be and it .is hereby approved as the official -map of Contra Costa County and the Supervisors are authorized to sign said map. The foregoing Order is passed by the unanimousvote of the Board* I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors. affixed this-4..--...day of......kjn0V.0Lnbp_,V--, 195--- • W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By ....... ............. Deputy Clerk. ---------- 54-8-IOM--H24 ..,n,.;x..c�avuc.+taro.�ntimax'w."'•^e-"ate � �. - _ � - February Js 195 ' ._ -.a•.� �ara�r�iaF`�uF�fifeSo�ix� : . CW-ITRA 00rTrA-cO.. SUR V17 ING AND MAPPING Survoying .measures ,and records data .about points of interest and paints of reference for the establishing of such:paints. Mapainsr records by ,diagrams and figures, the location of ,tti.ese points. It is very important to have records and:reaps so than the points can be identified and re-established when needed,or ,necessary, A grid,, as were used, means a series .of intersectio lir_es used for the location of points and esta,bli.shing the directions of liras. star:examplet. (1) A football :field.with side-lines, goal-lines and center-line,' is a form of a"grid where locati.on of the ball can be:-plotted. (2) Lines drawn on a graph using .quadra ruled:,paper, is a foam of a grid. it graph usually denotes distances as X, horizontal, and Y.- vertical. . (3) Township lines and_section lines;,-as, rased for showing propertyy are a. form of .arid. ( ) e meridians 'of longitude and parallels of latitude f'oarm a grid for the surface of -the earth..: (5) The California-Coordinate .System Is a form gf grid' for the purpose of establishing .points on tdie earth Is.-surfaceq- In ,this system, the coordinate in the east directionE is. bal,le.d it,and the.coordinate in the north direction is called Y. On the. earth,s.surface' by subdividing the :Latitude and longitude, . . arV point can be uniquely compared to a similar, location.:as required or. desired. In the same manner, on the California' Goord:inatiO Wetem, by subdividiri' the units of measurements, the .same point" can be uniquely Located -on the Coordinate System. These coordinates -by mathematical formulae, can be changed from one system, to the other. By using a small strip U!rom $0 to100miles, .in width) a"pr•pection can be made, farpro ectir points from the earthy s surface to the surface of thestrip. This allows. the surveyor or engineer to do" his ina�in and engineering cork on a•plane surface. Far Contra Costa County and`(the/ 5nited Stateg�Coast and Geodetic Survey has .set, up a grid designated a.sZone ZIS, California C76 dinate System, the county mE no being drawn, is being drawn on the coordinates of .Zone III _'The County Surveyor requires subdivision maps to be so submitted that the' .north point on the subdivision map coincides with the grid north of Zone III. = Insofar as possible, the County Surveyor is requiring all maps and,map data to begin accordance with -Zone III. FRECEIVED MAR 2 51992 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NOTICE OF A P U'1W'51h I C A"Kwll You are hereby notified that on TUESDAY. FEBRUARY 11 , 1992 at 7:30 p.m. in Room 107, McBrien Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, the Contra Costa County Planning Commission BOARD OF APPEALS will consider a LAND USE PERMIT application as described as follows: WILLIAM & TANYA DESMOND (Applicants & Owners), County File #2085-91: The applicant requests approval to establish a residential second unit. Subject property is addressed #8 Golden Hill Court, in the Walnut Creek area. (R-15) (ZA: R-15) (CT 3430.01) (Parcel #180-160-027) If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the County at, or prior to, the public hearing. For further details, contact the Contra Costa County Community Development Department, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, or phone DEBBIE DRENNAN at (415) 646-2031. Harvey E. Bragdon, Director Contra Costa County Community Development Department NOTIFICATION LIST - William & Tanya Desmond - APPEAL - #2085-91 - Page #1 William L . & Tanya Desmond Earl & Kathryn Jelter Mel & Glenna Morgan 8 Golden Hili Court 41 McConnell Lane 1 Golden Hill Court Walnut Creek, California 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 John & Janice Binkley Patrick & Suzanne Mahoney Edward & Vinette Fraser 112 Golden Hill Place V/ 40 McConnell Lane ✓ 117 Golden Hill Place V Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif.94596 Mary L. Hudson, Attorney Emilio & Lizabeth RuisDean & Marilyn Hurd 1736 Franklin Street 72 McConnell Lane ✓ 9 Golden Hill Court Oakland, California 94612-3419 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif.94596 Maurice E. Huguet, Attorney David & Gail Frederick William & Lana Rocha 924 Main Street 11 Trina Court 109 Golden Hill Place Martinez, California 94553 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif.94596 William S. Schneider Steven & Cynthia Siljestrom Paul & Elizabeth Baxter 25 McConnell Lane '� '144 Golden Hill Place ✓ 141 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif.94596 Helen C . Marino Robert G. Thomas Hans & Jeri Beetz 4205 Walnut Boulevard � . 60 McConnell Lane ,/ 136 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif.94596 Ruth F. Tourtellotte Frances Stephens ✓ Clifford & Ida Barston 22 McConnell Lane ✓ 149 Golden Hill Place 157 Golden Hill Place ✓ Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 John F. O'Dea, Jr. William & Barbara Bodeman 4191 Walnut Boulevard 100 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 . Alvin & Karin Eckert Lloyd & Colleen Lekse 51 McConnell Lane 76 McConnell Lane Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 John & Judith Nelson Elsie Alumbaugh 34 McConnell Lane ✓ .30 McConnell Lane Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 ,- �- ` � -- William & Linda Martin Quentin & Ardys Nelson 29 McConnell Lane 108 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Douglas & Leslie Byrd Emmett & Ellen Monaghan (� g 152 Golden Hill Place 101 Golden Hill Place 1// Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 James & Nadine Blank Howard & Joan Strain 88 McConnell Lane V/ 125 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Manuel & Elena Hernandez Karl & Elizabeth Lorcke 50 McConnell Lane 133 Golden Hill Place Walnut Creek, Calif. 94596 Walnut Creek, Calif 1. 94596 Y Harvey E. Bragdon Community ® Contra r Director of Community Development Development Costa Department County Administration Building County 651 Pine Street 4th Floor, North Wing ce Martinez, California 94553-0095 `` -- Phone: 646-2031 __: February 27, 1992 V'. Mary L: Hudson Attorney at Law 1736 Franklin Street Eighth Floor Oakland, CA 94612-3419 Dear Ms. Hudson: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal dated February 21, 1992 for application #2085-91, which was denied by the County Planning Commission on February 11, 1992. Your appeal will be heard by the Board of Supervisors. You will be notified by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors when the appeal has been scheduled for hearini before the Board. You should be aware that you or your representative should be present at the earing. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Ton Bruno at 646-202031. Sincerely yours, . 7 Mary Fleming Chief of Land Development MF:df L2:2085-91.bos cc: File William & Tanya Desmond Public Works John & Janice Binkley, et al Leonard Vecchi 0-CU" 1,1,-,T MARY L . HUDSON 91FE521 PH 3. 14 ATTORNEY AT LAW _ S ` } t+_7 '�(' ,,/ February 21, 1992 Sunne Wright McPeak, Chair, and Members of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94565 Re: APPEAL OF WILLIAM AND TANYA DESMOND COUNTY FILE # 2085-91 Dear Chairwoman McPeak and Members of the B ard, On January 6, 1992, the Zoning A inistrator for Contra Costa County approved the application of William and Tanya Desmond to establish a residential second unit in connection with their home at 8 Golden Hill Court, Walnut Creek. The decision was appealed by a neighbor. On February 11, the Planning Commission denied the Desmonds' application. This appeal from the Planning Co ission decision is filed on behalf of William and Tanya Desmo d. Their appeal is based upon: ( 1) the overall consistency of the project with the County General Plan and Zoning Ordinances, (2) the project's consistency with specific Zoning Ordinance standards for approval of residential second units,' (3) the proj ct's consistency with Zoning Ordinance standards for establishing a conditional land use,' and (4) satisfaction of the Zoning Ordinance appeal standards 3 These points are covered in the discussion below.' ' Section 82-24 . 1002, Title 8, Contra osta County Code. ' Section 26-2.2008, Title 8, Contra C sta County Code. a Section 26-2 .2404 , Title 8, Contra Costa County Code. These standards appear to be designed for appeals from project approvals. This case involves, instead, appeal from denial of an application, so that the applicability of the standards is doubtful. Nevertheless, the appeal fully satisfies these standards. Detailed responses to issues conside ed by the Planning Commission cannot be provided at this time because the Commission has not yet adopted findings to support its decision. The Applicants will submit responses after findings are adopted. 1736 FRANKLIN STREET, EIGHTH FLOOR • OAKLAND, CA 94612-3419 • 510-465-4494 FACSIMILE 510-465-6248 Sunne Wright McPeak, Chair Members, Board of Supervisors February 21, 1992 Page 2 1. General Plan and Zoning Ordinances. The proposed residential second unit would comply with all applicable requirements of the County General Plan and Zoning Ordinances. The General Plan use designation, Single-Family Residential, Low-Density, and the R-15 zoning both allow residential second units, subject to required County approvals. See Chapter 82-24, Title 8, County Code. Further, establishment of second units in existing residential areas furthers provisions of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinances which seek to preserve the County's open space, concentrate urban development, and increase the supply of housing. 2 . Section 82-24.10, Standards for Approval of Residential Second Units. The proposed project would comply with all of these standards. a. The unit is to be rented, leased, or occupied by one or more persons, and the Applicants are prepared to accept such a restriction. b. The lot exceeds the 6,000-square-foot minimum size requirement. C. The unit satisfies all zoning ordinance specifications. The sideyard setback of 10 feet, of which the adjoining neighbor has complained, is consistent with zoning, as are the height, location, and coverage of the structure. Coverage of the second unit will be 640 square feet,' less than two-thirds of the allowed 1,000 square feet. No variance is required for authorization of this project. d. A separate entrance to the second unit is located, as required, to the rear of the structure and is not visible from the street-front area. e. The project is architecturally compatible with overall neighborhood character and the primary residence. The new structure, designed by the respected Santa Rosa firm, JR Designs, echoes the stucco and shingle roof design of the primary residence which, in turn, is harmonious with the neighborhood character. Neighbor complaints that rental of the unit would be incompatible with the neighborhood really concern the proposed use, and not the architecture. f. Addition of the second unit would not overburden public services, utilities, or facilities, or create excessive noise, traffic, or parking problems. Infrastructure and public Sunne Wright McPeak, Chair Members, Board of Supervisors February 21, 1992 Page 3 services in this low-density area are in place and are ample for the small increment of increased use proposed. Traffic in the immediate neighborhood (a series of cul-de-sacs) is very light, and capacity would not be overburdened by addition of one dwelling. Two on-site parking spaces would be provided for the second unit through a garage addition. Nothing about this project in any way indicates that it or its future occupants will create excessive noise. g. The project presents no threat to public health, safety, or welfare. On the contrary, by increasing the supply of housing at the relatively affordable level of small rental units, the project will enhance the public health, safety, and welfare. 3. Section 26-2.2008, Standards for Establishment of Conditional Land Uses. These standards are also satisfied by the project. a. The project will not adversely affect realization of General Plan policies and goals. Instead, it will contribute to their implementation by providing new housing in existing urban areas, thus avoiding loss of open space and agricultural lands and the public costs of extending public services to these areas. In achieving these planning goals, the project will make a positive contribution to, rather than interfering with, orderly development within the County. b. The project will not adversely affect preservation of property values or protection of the tax base within the County. On the contrary, the project can be expected to enhance property values and thus to augment the County tax base. C. The project cannot be expected to create a nuisance or enforcement problem within the neighborhood. The residential use proposed is an allowed use, and nothing about the project warrants concern that the residential users of this unit will create nuisance or enforcement problems. d. The project will not encourage marginal development within the neighborhood. The proposed use is an allowed use which requires no variance of applicable zoning controls and which can be expected to enhance the value of property in the neighborhood. e. The health, safety, and welfare of the County will be enhanced, as explained above, rather than diminished by this project. Sunne Wright McPeak, Chair Members, Board of Supervisors February 21, 1992 Page 4 4. Section 26-2.2404(c) , Grounds for Appeal. Three of these standards may be relevant to this -project. a. Effect on property value and consistency with General Plan: Addition of the second unit to the Desmonds' property would increase its value and would comply with the General Plan. Because the property and proposed project fully satisfy County standards for approval of a second unit land use permit, and because State and County laws strongly favor approval of such housing units, Mr. and Mrs. Desmond could reasonably expect approval of such a project on their property. Accordingly, denial of the application to build such a project would deprive them of that reasonable expectation and adversely affect the value of their property. This adverse effect could not be justified by a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan because it is not. b. Required standards and evidence relied upon by Planning Commission: The standards which control approval of a residential second unit and a conditional land use are indicated above. No relevant and credible evidence was presented to the Planning Commission to establish inconsistency with any of these standards. C. Specified findings and their supporting evidence. The Applicants are informed that the Planning Commission has not adopted findings in support of its decision. No such findings were articulated at the hearing. The Applicants therefore cannot comment at this time on the Commission's findings. For the reasons indicated above, William and Tanya Desmond request that their appeal be set for hearing by the Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, A L. HUDSON for AND TANYA DESMOND cc: William and Tanya Desmond ~ � v �� �� �/ �� � � �\.f-:. � 1' �,:✓ � r fir .��� �'?� -s z a \ ` Q 411 Fo CA In � t � i� CIO cy NJ J -v i (n -S •� rtN Y (i , t � dJ � � � •' � fit. �` t aQ kA i CI, LU 4 1.v J i W w W r G („ 4. h, c Z4 m r. N � C CIG . a rN �r CW '3 \ \ ~ G N cN N o Ui`TTVERSITY,.OF TA. UEpARTMENT`OF ENGI,lVEERING. CIQIL E►�1GIidESA�1W(r'A-ND.IRRIGA7ION BHAKEE6Y 4; CALUORNIA ' r. January 28, 1954 .41 'W. ''B ril.e,y ,Y.Courlty'.:Surveyor . . < } kt"• Contr* CQ ata Cou it r N i id'i ng ` ` _ �iK�.rtnes,` Caici'forrTi.a; Y,. . - �3®ar �`�'• eBax+.kley. ; . ;.1 : _ , I w6wu d Niki to.t10zk:,you again for youx kind hospitality t Wednesday n ,. It.,_ . thorougtill+,enjoyed myself. Poilowing isr :the list of 'advantages in- acs Ing the California t Oocrdirlat® System ,whi.oh: I "igpok®1of that evenings ' t'r vers® of low acure'oy°'rovhiah .is ad justea, between two ooc►:^%inated contrbl'`mosiuments wsl actually raised- in its auraoy simply �ay':vi."rtue of the -coruieetion, and adjustment. 2. The, use of'-,th® system eliminates blunders or mistakes - a used because 'When t�roaor. ,more control monuments exok on doth position then mcinxzme s rovido' an 'abso .ixte ch at:d-=orientation. This. leaves the'surveyor or engineer in av'©.c5nfident `state of mind regarding his work. .3. -If two surV* eys altogether separated I!from one another are both, tied to the`'Coordinate System, then these two surN are .positively r'el'"ated to one another.. The system brings ' any and- -all. surveys tied to it to a :common position datuTn.. 4. :If a point on the earth's surface is established. on the Sys- tem' that is, if its X and, Y coordinates on the State system hate been established, then this' point' can always be found to a ':very ciose­approximation.,even though the physical marker -des-i jnating, the point has beon*completley destroyed. `Thia is done simply by .carrying traverse from other monu- ments on tha system:. There is no obance of having a lost oorner in the legal sense of :tho. wo`rCd lost. .,5*- the System el-I inatee the need for rrVunning-random lines Which in thems®lvej$, can be most confusing when linos are rerun. 4' +6 ✓ Y ` 1 • } ., II i i ?+1 is 541- i �V J• I � . 4 . r -2w � 6. Yraliumin'ar, suave Ma £ax."l i hwa ,.�wa er s and other' ,'• Y Y . y , °� y 41related 'aorstruction' a'ff'ords a rigid 'aontirol�,'f'or the "r eonatruetiAxi if tie preliminary,sur, vIveIy has been ad- f J r iOtad .,be+tween'-exi:'sting mo�umenta. `�. ,be yt me `�► survey. :o ` seobad, brder accuracy,or better .'iSi rui3 b:etbv®sn 'b"oardinated% Vabftlary '9, 19 SMMIND AW TUMM Surveying,measures and records data about points of interest ad points of reference for the establishing of such points. as ap Y ,records by diagrams-and 1i ass, thee leecatti ►ari of tl c+e points. ' - It is Very importamt to have records anid aataapsso that the- points.can be. i.de•*ntifie9<d and reeme$stablished .when needed ox necessary. A. grid, as here used,, moms a series. cf intersecting U,nea used for the location of points and establish the dLrrectic a lines, or examples (l) A football field with s de_ s_I goal-lines seed center-line, is a form of a grid where,location of the ball loan be plotted. (2) fir€ a.drawn on. a. graph using quardra ruled pars is .a farm of a grid. A graph usual desr�4ptes distances `4 horizontal, ..a>rari Y � vertical. (j} Township lines, and section liaites+ as used fear showing pro a are a, form of grid. e meridians of longitude and pAralle'lle of latitude form a . grid for the.surfsaee of they earth. (5) Ta California Coordinate aystem;is as foray of grid:for the purpose of establishing points on the earths s qurface, In"this a atem, the coordinate in the east"direction is called X aetd the voordinate In they north direction is called Y. On the earth's sir'face, by subdividing the latitude and :Longitude a =V paint can be uniquely compared to a similar location as required or desired* In the same manner,` on. the California Coordinate System, by subdividing the uttaits of measurements.,ments, the.sal point can be uniquely located on the CoordinaSystem* Theme. coordi.riatl by mathematical formulae, can be changed from oft eystam to the other. BY us i a small strip .(from 8th to 104 miles in width] a projection can bra made for. projecting paints from the earth t a surface to the surface' of the. strip. This allows the sa rVeyo r .or ealr to do his mapping and engineering workon a plane surfaceo For ContraCosta County$ the United States Coast and' Geodetic matey has set up -a grid designated as done lam, California Coordinate System. The county mAp now being dar'aun# is being dram .on the coordinates of Zone III. The County Surveyor- requires subdivision maps to be •so submitted that the north point on tho.subdivision map coincides with tete grid north of Zone III. Insofar as possible, they County Surveyor 3s requiring all map s in d map data is be in accordame with Zone III. 60 70 80 9D 10 20 30 40 60 70 80 90 10 20 30 40 60 70 tea., 90 145OM 1500M ,�N•� 15 OM , � 1600M \5 1650M „ p o ` 1700M A °\�%%' :-\°p3 p°5\p3• O \'(.a 9 r e i- ® fie,, O - ----- -- - - — ---- - --- ---- -- --- - 80 FANO 1 COVN ly -_ 704. -._ _ -- --- --- --- - - - - - --- -- -- 70 — C CKETT CO RODEO I , ••__, fRT NICHOLS CHICAGOco 60 ` - -- --- - -- - -- -� - ------ - - -- --- - - - --- - 60 .CLYDE • SACRAMENT �• t MARTINS � - • 1 BETHEL f # -0°69 PITTSBURG / A TIOCH '- 55 ---- ' a- ---_ --- � 550M HERCULES /°o4yT„ - - w '. 39°00', 19 CIO ` 06 , J Oo OO OAKLEY N t P os . �'�s : Jsop j 4/ � ar . PA8L0 ACHFCo CONCOR O 4O - - - _- --___ _�-_ - ._� --- __ _ _ _ ---- ----- - - _ - - - -- --- ------ -- ---- - ---- _ -- - - --- v ---- i ti ! KNIGHTSE N 40 1 .,.... ..r. + PLEASANT Ar • �...• _ «,.: ••.,, • i- .-.♦ � _.♦-+--- ••--'- HILL i COWELL O i. ••M • • .._. ....._..._.-._ _ _ _ .-.. __._- ---..-...__-.-_... - _ -.- _._._._-_- .. ..__ _-.._.--.- _ _.__ _-_ -30 1 s— CLAY ON EL CERRI .. O •--• © N 0 •, y -- BRENDAOOD { Z - -- -- --- -- - ♦r ♦ j Q • ! 20 _ u ,► N'r1( CREEK i . C U .r •.. 10 -�- --- - =- - ' - - - - - -- 10 w 1rQn¢-1210 54'4 :'107 $�5T ORI A LAT -37°52'5 '.387 I • \°04 CRO ADS •• j---•--+-- -d MOUNT 4 � A t 'DIABLO sA -•_ X-1592 180.44 * ♦ 37°52:5 , ` A--0--•i ---•r, - Y- 50.6 186.7 --♦ BYR N 500M -- .-- --,-' }* 500M U S.G S 7.5 QUAD SHEETS ALAMO I j . 146 95 A-MARE ISLAND 160 50 M-LONE TREE VALLEY ' 160 ! d-8ENlCIA 164 50 N-SRENTW000 , '...� ;.»•t :; + j 153 55 O-PORT CHICAGO 1" 50 Q-WOODWARD 157 5 D-HOWER 8AX 149 46 P-OAKLAND E. '•••• ••••• 's...% i •...•� :.... 160 65 E-COLLOOVILLE 153 46 0-LAS TRAMPAS ROC. ♦ j 164 55 G.-,IE-RSEY 157 R- Ar8 AL - -- --- ------ ... _.. - - -- -- ------ ------ i._. __�_.- ---•---•-- -- ---- -- - _ _- --- --- -- -- ----- - :�© _ T DI LOS `I OR A G A DIABLO ♦ I` 168 55, G-8OULDIN 160 44, S-TASSAJARA 142 5J "-SAN QUENTIN 164 46 T-LYftON HOT SPRINGS ;s 14651 1'1lJCHMOND 167 46. U-$0?HAPY DAN LLE 0 149 f J-9RItN1ES VALLEY 157 4L`,V-AMAD0R \(A1rLLEY ---•---♦ ' 153 E�0 K-NAfLNtJT CREEK 160` 41' W-Pt.'EASA N N.E. 157 56 L-iNT INABLO N.W. ' 80 ' S 80 t -+ 6TH i. l 4TH \ LEGEND TAS AJARA 3R0 COUNTY BOUNDARY Q- 70 SUPERVISOR DISTRICT--r-•-•-^� _-- - - - --- I - -- -- 2ND Y PU1<It.IC ROAD R O --� -- IST 12-9-53 70 CALIF COORDINATE RAILROAD ; REVISION DATE SYSTEM ZONE TR a IN SEC = [DIFF. (IN SEC) OF LONG ' FROM ORIGIN] x ,61223 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LONG 120*30' 1 Lo ORIGIN - LAT, 36°30 t+A-1000 Ft, esr 1004 .06.06 x o°�� .61 ° $,0 '05 ° N.�e „ a OFFICE COUNTY SURVEYOR 1:12© 000 60 AT ORIGIN-Y D 0o I�� = I O,Ot�QFt e r - 5 --- - -. a 9s ° O'� • 3•p 60 CONTRA ' COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA 0 SCALE 1N THOUSANDS Of FEET !�►�''`I!► 37 45 14 5 10 20 30 40 a JO S. W. BARKLEY COUNTY SURVEYOR 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \op ` •39 o St'Oo51.p94 0 -,00yo Aa o a'OogdZT''g3 OCTOBER 1953 o•ip6'.Ap 45 M SCALE - IN MILES � � a © , e" N � g'p 50M 1450M OSS'„33 1 15 OM 15-50M. 1600M 1650M 1700M 60 70 80 90 10 20 30 40 60 70 @0 90 10 20 30 40 60 70 80 90 MISS SMITH I a 1 70 80 90 10 20 30 40 60 70 80 90 10 '20 30 40 60 70 Or'�� 90 14 OM 60 1500M �� 15 OM 1600M ,OS"t6 1650M ,�„3p 17 .OM so 80--- SOLA 0 A 0LAN0 �ull Y j ,� - -- 70 i 70 — OJ C CKETT 4. RI CO ODEO •. NICHOLS - *CAGOt_� ! CiN 0 —60 6O --°- •--•--.--, CLYDE q NT ' ♦ BETHEL ti rtSBURG TIOCH PIN * 0 550 M 550 y e, _-__,-= es°°o 3 ' °06,0 e �+ HERCULES ' /°oqy?., °o moo° ! '%o° OAKLEY er_ o Sd� &O 9 /q q ,� t k 0`4 •y eJ ! CoASAN Q f r PABLO } PACHEc CONCOR _ �. - - -- --- --- _� — -- — —-- ' — —� 40 - - --- --- KNIGHTSE a • s 1 PI»EA181MT •, Z i .j....• ..ti...r. ,� HILL (� • : COWELL , Q 30 CLAY ON NMI EL t � iUL CERRIT , .. ...,� j e •.... ti '! WREN OD Z 20 rI ► r, �.rA.:. ,.5 ( � m _„may,,,•,,,; .. . .. STI' .. '4. ... _ .... t l . M Y i r u'. 5. Y.S w r • . . : .. - 3.... • s �- v. 1J1� . -v . y NUT . • : • � � • : .• : . - _ . ..CREEK '. ' j► Y r' 4 • 10ol , 10 �_. (a$-121°84'4 ".'10 T 4 ; � F. OR LA -37°52'R ".7ltI6Mt4UMT ,o 08 CR08 DIABLO JOS X-1 592 8Q4 37°!12. - , Y- 5q6 I86.?T—+ f OM i B`+8N 500M Ys a1. - - -•- i t 50 U S.G S 7.5` ou” 146 !f!¢ A*MARE ISLAND I+ab so IiNA4�iE TREE aIIALLlIY � 0050 1s-9909CIA 164 0 "-'%It K"W0i! •'••, •• �•�•ti :S a� s=•. .•.*r 163 S6 d p ,tAYlIICA00 ISS !f@ .•,Q-WO�ARD "•�•�; ,.». •. 157 35 D-HONKER BAY, 149 4S P'OAKLA840 E.' 160 65 ETCOLLINSVILLE 183 46 Q'•LA* YAAM�S ROO. tsa 136 F-JERSEY. 1.:57 4Sii+ �►'i�T�.1�l�R!lL0;13:t11� --- --- -- - --•---•-_.•. �-..�,► __;_ _ _—.___.._-...-- - --------- ---- -__ -- - --- ----- 90 1�1 , R A M QiC A ii A 01ABL.0 _ _ 90 I V 168 S6 6-BOULDIN 16O ,/ 8- .A S S AJ A 14961 H-SAN QUENTIN 164 " T ,11""'ON HOT "RTN88 14651 1"RICHMOND 187 40 U'pETHA1,1Y DAN LLE z ---�---• �� d 0 14961 J-BRIONES VALLEY 167 4�, 1('A1YI I R LIEY IfOrN 1 -•••- ► i 1535 X-WALNUT CREEK 18� 41 'YM-PLEASA' N.E. W 187 SO L-�il WABLO N.W. ' 80VL 8O N6�E ♦. -+---•--- f 5TH j 4TH LEGEND TAS AJARA 3RD COUNTY BOUNDARY ��i.li 2ND W • SUPERVISOR DISTRICT-- —0-+ 0 IST 12-9-53 70 PUBLIC ROAD RA M • REVISION DATE 70 CALIF COORDINATE RAILROAD SYSTEM ZONE IN SEC • DIFF (IN SEC) OF LONG COVN� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ° FROM ORIGIN X (0:612232 LONG Ito 30 M=1000 Ft, 006 A n OFFICE COUNTY SURVEYOR ORIGIN— o , �T.0 03�4►•0 6 p5 0 LAT 3603d 1.120 000 %!04 ®s-p - og6° . a ° se-to ` e.OA X22,000,000 ' e'- , 60 60 AT ORIGIN-Y_ I = IO,000Ff 9 L►p' _' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE IN THOUSANDS OF FEET 1�► 37°45' I 0 5 10 20 30 40 a JOS. W. BARKLEY COUNTY SURVEYOR 0 0 8T,Og A C - �, AA a 4g 2T, 43 OCTOBER 19 5 3 3�p6'.A° I, 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 opb`3�'3 ''O° SCALE IN MILES jB =' a 50M 450M - /oo9s/ ( 15 OMI 1550M 1600M 1650M 1700M 1450M 33 60 70 80 90 10 20 30 40 60 70 P80 90 10 20 0 40 60 70 80 90 i I