HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09181984 - 1.87 s,
rro: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
f . Contra
FROM: Ida Daniel Berk, Director, Community Services Department Costa
DATE: September 18, 1984 . 4i) County
SUBJECT: Report from Director, Community Services Department, Responding to CY 1983 Audit
Report for Head Start Grant Numbers H-0375-18 and 9C55/05
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
REQUEST:
APPROVE report from Director, Community Services Department, in response to
September 11 , 1984, Board referral regarding August 23, 1984, Regional Inspector
General for Audit, Department of Health And Human Services letter transmittal
audit report of certain Head Start CY 1983 Grants, and FORWARD said response to
Department of Health And Human Services.
BACKGROUND: •
On August 28, 1984, the Board received a letter dated August 23, 1984, from the
Regional Inspector General for Audit, Department of Health and Human Services ,
requesting Grantee response based on the audit report on the United States
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Head Start Grant numbers H-0375-18
and 9C55/05 as administered by the Community Services Department for the contract
period of January 1 , 1983, through December 31 , 1983.
Said letter was placed and noted in the correspondence portion of the September 11 ,
1984, Board agenda and was referred to the Community Services Department for
preparation of a reply.
Department staff have complied with this request as noted by the attached audit
response. As a result of this response, it is expected that no questioned cost
of the $1 ,726,555 of the grant funds expended in CY 1983 will be assessed.
Upon acceptance of an approval by the Board of the attached response document, it
will then be forwarded to the Regional office so as to meet the submittal deadline
of September 21 , 1984, as indicated in the August 23, 1984, correspondence.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATU
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON eF em er 13 iVZ54APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT III ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED September 18 , 1984
Auditor-Controller Phil Batchelor Clerk of the Doaru of
Community cervices Supervisors and County Administrator D
Health and Human Services Dept . 00190
M382/7-e9 BY 1 DEPUTY
CommunityServices Department Contra Community Services (671-4540)
P Head Start (671.4540)
Housing ! Energy (671-4544)
24? Bisso Lane, Suite 120 Costa
Concord, California 94520
(4 15) 671-4544 County
Ida Daniel Berk
Executive Director
September 12, 1984
Director, Office of Fiscal Operations
Office of Human Development Services
HHS Region IX
50 United Nations Plaza
San Francisco, Ca. 94102
This letter is in response to your correspondence dated August 23, 1984,
to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors requesting clarification
on three items noted in the audit report of FY 83 Head Start Grant numbers
H-0375-18, and 9C55/05 as prepared and submitted by the firm of Izabal and
Bernaciak, Certified Public Accountants.
The county's response will coincide in order of their notation in your
8-23-84 correspondence to the Board of Supervisors .
REPORT RECOMMENDATION: The County implement a plan that will more
appropriately match cash receipts to needs by increasing the frequency and
decreasing the amount of draws .
QUESTIONED COSTS: None
COUNTY RESPONSE: The County is amenable to the auditors recommendation,
and has already implemented a process whereby drawdowns will be submitted on
a bi-weekly basis , and the amount requested will match the funds required to
operate the program for the aforementioned time period.
REPORT RECOMMENDATION: The County develope a system to account for the number
of low-income enrollees by subgrantee on a regular basis and maintain the
documentation.
QUESTIONED COSTS: 'None
COUNTY RESPONSE: To begin with, the county, as a part of its contract
minotoring process, has estabished a system to account for the number of low-
income enrollees by subgrantee on a routine basis. This system has been in
effect for the last fifteen years of program operation including 1983, the
program year in question. Head Start regulations require that at least 90%
of the children enrolled in the county's Head Start are from low-income families
as derived from Federal Poverty Guidelines . To ensure that this requirement is met
0019 .
Affirmative Action % Equal Opportunity Employer
Page two
J n
by the county, a random sample of approximately ten percent of the total
Head Start client population on an annual basis is taken and reviewed by
Head Start administrative staff. This task was performed in CY 1983.
The problem arose, however, in that the particular report noting the
CY 1983 analysis could not be located during the course of the audit,
hence the finding.
The County acknowledges the necessity in this instance of maintaining
better records , and is in the process of restructuring the present system
to ensure that maintenance of all program documentation is assured.
REPORT RECOMMENDATION: The County retroactively substantiate for review
by the auditors that at least 90% of Head Start children were from low-
income families , or that the county negotiate a settlement with the Health
and Human Services Administrator as to the amount it cost claimed to be
allowed.
QUESTIONED COSTS: To be determined.
COUNTY RESPONSE: The county has complied with this request, the data and
results of which are available for review by both your agency and CPA firm
who made the finding. The CPA firm has been notified by the county that the
requested data is available for review.
As noted earlier in this correspondence, an eligibility review of Head Start
children was performed by staff for fiscal year 1983, with the 90%
requirement being successfully met. The results of which were not at the
time available for the auditors review. In the past week, staff once again
conducted the same review, which indicated that 90.81 of the files examined
met Federal poverty guidelines.
Consequently, the county is in compliance with Health and Human Services
Program requirements, therefore, none of the $1 ,726,555.00 in federal costs
claimed in 1983 should be in question.
Thus concludes our response.
If there is any additional information and/or clarification regarding this
matter, please contact Albert Prince or Myron Mock of my staff at (415)
671-4544. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Since ely
Ida Daniel Berk, Executive Director
Contra Costa County
Community Services Department
IDB/sv
cc: Board of Supervisors
County Administrator
Auditor - Controller
Izabal and Bernaciak 00192