HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08281984 - T.3 _ 7
To: # BOARD OF SUFOVISORS •
Contra
FROM: County Auditor-Controller
COSta
DATE: Augur:.-t 28, . 1984_ County
SUBJECT: Fixing Secured Tax Rates and
Levying Property Taxes
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
The Board having received the tax rates to be levied on secured property
at 100 percent of full value and the tax levies for fiscal year 1984-85 as computed
by the County Auditor-Controller (copies of which are attached hereto and by reference
incorpoated herein) as required by State Law for the County, county special districts
and service areas, school districts and special education programs, districts governed
by local boards, and other public agencies for which the County collects taxes;
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the tax rates are FIXED and taxes are
LEVIED upon taxable property for fiscal year 1984-85 in accordance with the documents
attached hereto.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF BOARD ON AuguS , APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
XX UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED August 28, 1984
Auditor-Controller J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK
AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD
M382/7-83 BY DEPUTY
0 Office of •
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Countywide Tax Levy for 1984-85
Section 93(b) of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the county
to levy an ad valorem property tax on taxable assessed value at a rate equal
to $4.00 per $100 of assessed value. Beginning in fiscal year 1981-82, Section
135(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code states that the assessed value shall
mean 100 per cent of full value, and Section 135(b) states that the tax rate
shall mean a rate expressed as a percentage of full value. Accordingly your
Board should adopt the countywide tax levy as indicated.
Amount to be Raised Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Countywide Tax 281, 142,228 1.0000
DLB/SK:ell
• Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: County Special District Bond Issues Tax Rates for 1984-85
In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandates contained in
the various laws under which.bond proceedings were conducted, the following
tax rates should be levied by your Board for 1984-85 to meet the accruing
charges of the following county special district bond issues. All of these
bond issues were voter approved.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Orinda Fire 1968 Issue 34,974 .0044
Storm Drainage District 4116 9,066 .0078
Sanitation District 417B 11,199 1.0244
County Service Area R-8 534,539 .0155
Sanitation District 4115 243,231 .2620
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Tax Rate Reduction -- Mt. Diablo Hospital District
Section 100 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires a tax rate
reduction to the properties within the jurisdiction that requested that its
calculated property tax revenue be reduced. The Mt. Diablo Hospital District
requested no proerty tax revenue for 1984-85. Accordingly, the revenue
apportioned for the Mt. Diablo Hospital District is calculated with a negative
tax rate and it is your duty to set this rate.
Amount to be Credited Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Mt. Diablo Hospital 55,436 .0013
DLB/SK:ell
Office of 0
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Hospital District Tax Rate
Certification received from the Los Medanos Hospital District Board
of Directors indicate their tax requirement for voter approved indebtedness.
Your duty to levy this rate is provided in Section 93(a) , Revenue and Taxation
Code and Section 32221, Health and Safety Code.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Los Medanos Hospital 936,426 .0568
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-.Controller
SUBJECT: Local Special District Bond Issues and Debt Service Tax Rates
for 1984-85
In accordance with the terms of issue and mandates contained in the
various laws under which debt and bond proceedings were conducted, the following
tax levies should be made by your Board for 1984-85 to meet the accruing charges
of the following local special district bond issues. All of these bond issues
were voter approved.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Sanitary Districts:
Central #2 434,187 .0039
Crockett-Valona 57,084 .0996
Mt. View 51,029 .0091
Rodeo 78,951 .0509
West County 1,677,102 . 1389
Stege 115,424 .0141
Recreation and Park Districts:
Pleasant Hill 138,194 .0127
Water Districts:
Crockett-Valona 51,128 ,0781
El Sobrante 14,851 .0877
San Miguel Estates 285 .0010
San Ramon Valley
Walnut 10,929 .0199
Municipal Improvement Districts:
Bethel Island 22,143 .0351
DLB/SK:ell
• Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Contra Costa County Water District Tax Rates for 1984-85
Certifications received from the Board of Directors of the Contra Costa
County Water District of the amounts required for their voter approved indebtedness
will require the following levies and tax rates.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Contra Costa Water Land Levy 551,3.00 .0161
Contra Costa Water, Improvement
District 411 448,539 .0084
Contra Costa Water, Improvement
District #2 29,459 .0306
The duty of your Board to levy these rates are provided in Water Code
Section 31158 for the land levy and Water Code Section 31702 for Improvement
District 411 and Improvement District 412.
DLB/SK:ell
• Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Dublin-San Ramon Services District's Tax Rate for 1984-85
Certification received from Dublin-San Ramon Services District requires
1984-85 tax levy and rate for its voter approved indebtedness. The duty of
your Board to levy this tax rate on the portion of this district within Contra
Costa County is set forth in Sections 61755 and 61757, Government Code and
Section 93(a) , Revenue and Taxation Code.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Dublin-San Ramon Services District 101,923 .0200
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: School Districts' Levies for State School Building Permits
and Lease/Purchase Requirements for 1984-85
Section 93(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides for levies
pursuant to Park 10, (commencing with Section 15000) of Division 1 and Section
39308 of the Education Code. The below listed levies and rates indicated as
State School Building Repayment (SSB) are within Part 10, Division 1 and Lease/
Purchase is covered by Section 39308 of the Education Code. These requirements
were provided by the Superintendent of Schools and it is your duty to levy these
rates.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Moraga SSB 501,891 .0802
Martinez Unified SSB -- --
Richmond Unified SSB 1,224,295 .0240
San Ramon Unified Lease/Purchase 1,028,823 .0263
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Elementary School District Bond Interest and
Redemption Tax Rates for 1984-85
In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in
Section 15250 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following
tax levies for 1984-85 to meet accruing charges of the following elementary
school district bond issues. All of these bond issues were voter approved.
Amount Required Rate of percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Brentwood 33,526 :00.93
Knightsen 30,798 .0449
Lafayette -- --
Moraga 109,638 .0176
Oakley 27,381 .0084
Orinda 8E, 9C-10C 72,274 .0084
Pinole-Hercules 33,167 .0033
Walnut Creek 18,826 .0010
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Corttroller
SUBJECT: High School Districts' Bond Interest and Redemption Tax Rates
In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in
Section 15250 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following
tax levies for 1984-85 to meet accruing charges of the following high school
districts' bond issues. All of these bond issues were voter approved.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Acalanes #7A-8B 231,656 .0051
Acalanes #8C-8D 111,894 .0025
Liberty #IE-2D 69,999 .0069
Richmond X65 481,060 .0095
DLB/SK:ell
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
August 28, 1984
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Unified School Districts` Bond Interest and Redempt on Tax Rates
In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in
Section 15250 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following
tax levies for 1984-85 to meet accruing charges of the following unified
school district bond issues. All of these bond issues were voter approved.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Antioch Issue 5-7B 497,730 .0337
Mt. Diablo Unified 1,283,130 .0188
Pittsburg Unified
Richmond Unified 1A 1C 339,799 .0067
San Ramon Unified (including
component elementary) 1,337,332 .0342
DLB/SK:ell
• ., it ..
Office of
COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Donald L. Bouchet, Auditor-Controller
SUBJECT: Joint School Districts' Tax Rates for 1984-85
Tax rates received from Alameda County for joint school districts
within Alameda County and Contra Costa County will require the below listed
tax rates and it is your duty to levy ,these rates.
Section 93(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides for levies
pursuant to Park 10, (commencing with Section 15000) of Division 1 and Section
39308 of the Education Code. The items indicated as State School Building
Repayment (SSB) are within Part 10, Division 1 and Lease/Purchase is covered
by Section 39308 of the Education Code.
The items indicated as bonds are voter approved indebtedness and are
in accordance to terms of issue and mandate of Section 15250 of the Education
Code.
Amount Required Rate as percentage
on Secured Roll of full value
Pleasanton Joint Elementary SSB 3,075 .0736
Bonds 781 .0187
Amador Joint High SSB 2,774 .0664
Bonds 1,253 .0300
Livermore Joint Unified SSB -- --
Lease/Purchase 8,024 .0602
Bonds 3,225 .0242
South County Community
College Bonds 945 .0054
DLB/SK:ell
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on August 28, 1984 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden , Schroder , McPeak, Torlakson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SUBJECT: the Proposed County Budget for the 1984-1985
Fiscal Year
The Board on August 21 , 1984 , deferred to this day deci-
sion on the proposed County Budget for the 1984-1985 fiscal year and
in connection therewith decision on the allocation of Federal Revenue
Sharing Funds .
In an August 27, 1984, report to the Board , Phil Batchelor ,
County Administrator , presented a summary schedule indicating the
changes which have occurred and recommended revisions to revenues
and expenditures to the Proposed Budget which would result in no
further cuts while maintaining a balanced budget . Mr . Batchelor
commented on the difficulties encountered in recording year-end
financial items to determine final fund balances in order to present
accurately the financial condition of the County at the close of the
1983-1984 fiscal year . He noted that the amounts included in the
Proposed Budget and subsequent recommended revisions must be modified
to conform to available financing.
The County Administrator recommended that the subsequent
adjustments recommended by the Finance Committee and revisions
included in the August 27, 1984, report be approved and become the
adopted Final County Budget for fiscal year 1984-1985 subject to the
following conditions:
1 . The County Administrator be directed to prepare a
resolution for elimination of unfunded positions and
for the lay-off of personnel as may be required to
conform to the approved Final Budget .
2. The general freeze on the filling of vacant permanent
positions be continued pending completion of the per-
sonnel resolution.
3 . The County Administrator be authorized to make such
technical changes to the budget as required to conform
to the intent of the Board of Supervisors .
4. The Federal Revenue Sharing allocations as indicated
in the Proposed Budget and subsequently modified in
the budget reports be used for General Assistance as
previously proposed .
Mr . Batchelor advised that his office will monitor expen-
ditures and revenues during the year and submit a financial status
report to the Board of Supervisors following the end of calendar
year 1984.
Supervisor R . I . Schroder moved approval of the recommen-
dations set forth above , and the motion was seconded by Supervisor
S. W . McPeak.
��g
Supervisor Torlakson noted that fencing for the Clayton
facility was included in the Budget . He also noted that Chief Ray
Morgan of the Eastern Fire Protection District was interested in
providing input on the security gate to be installed at said faci-
lity to insure compliance with fire safety standards .
Supervisor T . Powers inquired when the general freeze for
hiring new employees would be lifted and referred to problems con-
nected with under-staffing and the inability of certain departments
to fulfill their mandates', particularly the Social Service
Department .
Mr . Batchelor responded that the Personnel Department is
currently reviewing departmental staffing levels in line with budget
requirements that could be exempted from the freeze .
Supervisor Torlakson spoke on the need to respond to the
increasing demand for county services with the resources that are
available . He referred to allegations regarding the use of inmate
labor for certain maintenance work at detention facilities .
Supervisor Torlakson commented on staffing needs at the current
detention facility , staffing needs for the proposed new facility
including construction and operational costs , as well as the organi-
zational structure of the Sheriff' s Department . He noted that new
methods of doing business must be sought that have the potential of.
being cost effective .
Supervisor Powers referred to the potential staff reduc-
tions in the Social Service Department and the possibility of those
positions being restored if funds become available . He also
referred to the need to insure that the Sheriff has adequate depu-
ties for patrols .
Mr . Batchelor responded that $200,000 of the $587,000
requested has been restored to the Sheriff's budget . He noted that
the Sheriff provides police services to many cities under contract .
He noted that currently there are 15 vacancies in that department
and that any further reductions could jeopardize police services
provided to certain cities . Of the 63 positions in the Social
Service Department targeted for elimination , the County
Administrator estimated that 12 will be saved because of attrition.
He advised that retention of the remaining positions is dependent on
the funding allocation from the State . This information should be
available within the week and will be reported to the Board soon
thereafter .
There being no further discussion , IT IS ORDERED that the
aforesaid motion is APPROVED and the County Budget for the 1984-1985
fiscal year is hereby ADOPTED .
I hereby certify that this is s true and correct copyof
rt:1 ecNon taken and entorcd on the minutes c.f they
20ard of St.rperVisors erF the date shown.
cc: County Administrator `TTES TE*D: ,iy��
Auditor-Controller ���"- ----�
J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK
and sx officio Clerk of the Board