Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07241984 - 2.4 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY , CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on July 24, 1984 , by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers , Fanden, Schroder , McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Status of the 1984-1985 County Budget - The Board on July 10, 1984, requested the County Administrator to report to the Board on July 24, 1984 , of actions necessary to adopt a balanced County Budget for the 1984-1985 fiscal year . The Board received from Phil Batchelor , County Administrator , a report dated July 24, 1984, (copy attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein) , providing information on the status of the County Budget , including the impact of the State Budget and local . government funding bills on the County Budget and a summary of the discretionary revenue available for allocation. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said report is REFERRED to the Finance Committee (Supervisors Schroder and McPeak) for con- sideration in conjunction with its review of the proposed County Budget . I hereby certify that this Is s true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED:--LZ4, 24 l k IE Y _ J.R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK cc: Finance Committee and ex officio Clerk of the Board County Administrator \ Auditor-Controller nn By -y�s . Deputy 000192 .�, 4 Board of Supervisors .County Administrator Contra Tom Powers tit District County Administration Building COSta Nancy C.Fanden Martinez, California 94553 2nd District (415)372-4080 C.o rl / Robert 1.Schroder Phil Batchelor VvU� IL�/ 3rd District County Administrator Sunne Wright McPsak 4th District Tom Torlakson 5th District July 24, 1984 RECEIVED Board of Supervisors .�U " 1984 Administration Building 651 Pine Street J. R. Oi.SSON Martinez, California 94553 1290 CL[RK BOARD C SUPERVISORS CONTRFF��COSTA CO B . ............0...:.......... .. -D.Pu Dear Board Members : Subject: Status of the 1984-1985 County Budget Attached for your information is a copy of the July 20th letter prepared in response to your directions on July 10, 1984. This letter was discussed in summary form at the Finance Committee meeting on July 23, 1984. In addition to that letter, we have also attached a memorandum from the Health Services Department relating to the indirect cost allocation issues as they affect funding of Mental Health programs. You have been asked today to take action to eliminate a number of positions in the Health Services Department, most of which are vacant. I am concerned that my office and the Personnel Department do not have adequate controls on the ability of department heads to hire temporary employees. I have directed the Director of Personnel to assign a staff person full time to monitoring the need to hire temporary staff in the Health Services Department. We will be reviewing the layoff plan approved by your Board today in terms of ensuring that it adequately reduces personnel levels to the point that the Health Services Department budget is balanced. As soon as we have completed this review and have implemented sufficient controls to ensure , that the personnel budget in the Health Services Department remains balanced, we will make any further recommendations to your Board that seem appropriate. Respectfully, V PHIL BATCHELOR County Administrator PJB:clg Enclosures Board of Supervisors County Administrator Contra Ton+Power I at District County Administration Building Na Nancy Ci Fehden Costa Martinez,California 94553 � 2nd District (415)372-40130 �/ Robert I.Schroder Phil Batchelor ��J 3rd District County Administrator Sunne Wright McPeak 4th District Tom Torhduon 6M District July 20, 1984 Board of Supervisors Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 De&r Board Members: Re: Status of the 1984-1985 County Budget On July 10, 1984 we reported to your Board on the impact of the State Budget based on the information we had available at that time, and also noted preliminary information on the status of the local government funding bills and their impact on the County. Attached is a summary schedule showing the revisions to the proposed budget as estimated at this time. Your Board directed that we report back to you on July 24, 1984 recommending actions necessary to adopt a balanced budget for 1984-1985. The following report responds to that order. This report is divided into two major sections; first, on the status of the County Budget, including the impacts of State Budget and local government funding bills on the County Budget and the second part summarizing the discretionary revenue available to your Board for allocation as you deem most appropriate. In the first section, we have divided our presentation into six areas: A. Local Governing Financing Bills . B. The 1984-1985 Property Tax. C. The Fund Balances as of June 30, 1984. D. State Budget impacts on Health Services programs. E. State Budget impacts on Social Service programs. 000 9. Board of Supervisors 2. July 20, 1984 F. An analysis of revenue and expenditure projections for the County's investment program. A. Local Government Financing Bills As your Board is well aware, substantial efforts have been made in the last year to achieve a stable source of revenue for local government. Initially, Senator Marks introduced SB 1300 as the Governor's proposal for such stabilization and Assemblyman Cortese introduced AB 2468 as the democratic leadership's proposal for local government revenue stabilization. These bills were substantially amended during the session. At the very end of the session, before taking their summer recess, the Legislature amended SB 1300 and AB 2468 which were by then nearly identical, into two bills which were already in conference committees--SB 794 by Senator Marks and AB 1849, which was taken over by Assemblyman Cortese. The major provisions of SB 1300 and AB 2468 were split between SB 794 and AB 1849 in an effort to insure that both houses of the Legislature could assume some credit for providing local government with a stable source of revenue. These bills taken together impact local government in four specific areas: 1. The allocation of the supplemental property tax roll. 2. The allocation of vehicle license fees. 3. The business inventory exemption, 4 . The Special District Augmentation Fund. 1. The Allocation of the Supplemental Property Tax Roll. As part of the "Hughes-Hart Educational Reform Act of 1983" (SB 813) , the Legislature enacted a floating lien date to capture the value of real property which is newly constructed or changes ownership. The Legislature assigned these new property tax revenues to K-12 schools for 1983-1984 and 1984-1985. However, Legislative Counsel believes that this is not an exclusive assignment, and redevelopment agencies are entitled to receive the tax increment from these new property tax revenues. After the two years, these revenues revert to all local agencies which receive property tax revenues (cities, counties, special districts, redevelopment agencies, K-12 schools, and community colleges) . The revenues will be distributed through the existing method of allocating property taxes. • Board of Supervisors 3. July 20, 1984 For 1983-1984, the amendments to SB 794 make an exclusive assignment of the Supplemental Roll revenue to K-12 schools, eliminating any allocation to redevelopment agencies . Then, starting in 19841985, the amendments to SB 794 share these revenues among K-12 schools, cities, counties, special districts, community colleges, county superintendent of schools, and redevelop- ment agencies. For the 1984-1985 fiscal year, the County Auditor-Controller estimates that the County General Fund gain from the supplemental property tax roll will be $2,000, 000. 2. Vehicle License Fees. Last year the Legislature changed the rate structure for vehicle license fees (VLF) , producing new VLF revenues. Instead of paying these increased VLF revenues to cities and couftties, the Legislature sent them to the state' s own General Fund. Under current law, the State now receives an 18-3/4% share of VLF revenues . This amounts to $210 million statewide in 1984-1985. The amendments to AB 1849 transfer the $210 million that would have gone to the State General Fund to the no-property tax cities ($2 million) and to counties ($208 million) . Under the amendments to AB 1849, the 31 no-property tax cities get an extra share of VLF revenues to offset their losses from three specific state subventions which the Legislature repealed in 1981. Each year since then the Legislature has provided an annual budget appropriation to these cities. The amendments to AB 1849 place this.arrangement in statute. The bill also gives these cities a COLA so their payments will grow as VLF revenues grow. Counties receive their shares of the remaining $208 million in two ways: a. Each county receives an amount equal to the value of the repealed subventions ($178 M) . b. Each county then receives a share of the remaining $3.0 million in proportion to its population. Information provided us by the Legislative Analyst's office indicates that in 1984-1985 Contra Costa County will receive total vehicle license fee revenue of $17, 742, 267, an increase of about $5,082,000 more than was included in the Proposed Budget. __ U t!U Ij � . Board of Supervisors 4. July 20, 1984 3. Business Inventory Exemption. The Legislature has exempted several types of personal property from local property taxes: livestock, brandy and wine stocks, baled cotton, motion pictures, party boats. Until 1980, local officials assessed and taxed business inventories as personal property. The Legislature exempted these inventories from the local property tax base and promised to pay local agencies for their lost revenues. Payments go to all agencies which receive property tax revenues: cities, counties, special districts, redevelopment agencies, K-12 schools, and community colleges. Until 1983, the statutes spelled out a formula for determining the annual increase in these payments, but last year the Legislature repealed this COLA. In 1984-1985 these subventions are worth $328 million. The amendments to SB 794 repeal the State subventions for these personal property tax exemptions. In 1983-1984, the County received $4, 031, 186 from the business inventory property tax relief. If we had budgeted this revenue for the 1984-1985 fiscal year, it would have served to substantially offset the increased vehicle license fee revenue noted above: However, because we were fairly certain that we would lose the business inventory property tax relief, we budgeted nothing from this source in 1984-1985 and, therefore, this element of the local government funding bills has no impact on the County Budget as proposed. 4. Special District Augmentation Fund. As part of AB 8, the Legislature created a Special District Augmentation Fund in each county to allow local officials some flexibility in distributing scarce property tax revenues. The Legislature shifted some property tax revenues away from schools and towards other local governments to replace direct state "bailout" payments. Instead of moving these revenues directly to individual special districts, the Legislature placed them in a Special District Augmentation Fund in each county. Each county board of supervisors has complete discretion to allocate the Augmentation Fund among the special districts in its county. The amendments to AB 1849 "freeze" the Special District Augmentation Fund at its 1983-1984 level for independent districts. Starting in 1984-1985, property tax revenues generated from increases in assessed values will go directly to the independent special districts which had property taxes before Proposition 13. In addition, the amendments to AB 1849 restrict county supervisors, ability to allocate Augmentation Fund to districts which do not contribute to the Fund. Board of Supervisors 5. July 20, 1984 Freezing the Special District Augmentation Fund allocations to independent special districts will, in the long run, create some inequities between independent and Board of Supervisors ' governed special districts. Because any property tax increase above the 1983-1984 level must be allocated directly to the independent special district from which it is generated, your Board will lose some degree of discretion in the allocation of these funds. The latter provision restricting your Board's ability to allocate Special District Augmentation Funds is of far more concern to this County. There are three major areas affected by this provision: (1) the P-6 Sheriff's patrol special district created at the beginning of the 1983-1984 fiscal year; (2) the fi Cdunty library special district; and (3) the library service a areas. r The proposed budget for 1984-1985 includes allocations from the Special District Augmentation Fund of $3,600,000 for the P-6 district; $2, 053, 000 for the County Library, and $100, 000 for the Library Service Areas which were established some years ago to finance new branch libraries. The Board is ultimately obligated to fund the Library Service Areas out of the General Fund if the Special District Augmentation Fund is not available for that purpose since the County as a whole has an obligation to the Retirement Board for the lease-purchase payments for these branch libraries. If the remaining $5, 753, 000 for the P-6 district and County Library cannot come from the Special District Augmentation Fund, then at 'least some portion of these budget requirements will need ' to be taken from the County General Fund, although your Board has no obligation to finance the Sheriff's patrol or library services at exactly these levels. As your Board directed on July 17, 1984 efforts are underway to persuade the State Legislature to modify this restriction on the use of the Special District Augmentation Fund as soon as they return from their summer recess on August 6, 1984. My staff have been in communication with the Consultant to the Assembly Local Government Committee, who has asked for a letter setting forth the County's position in this matter. Each member of your Board has received a copy of this letter as has Assemblyman Cortese and each member of this County's legislative delegation. Members of your Board have also talked with Assemblyman Cortese, Senator McCorquodale, and othhrs who may be :helpful in getting this language modified. However, as of this date, the restriction on your ability to utilize the Special District Augmentation Fund Board of Supervisors 6 . July 20, 1984 for these districts which do not contribute property tax to the fund are the law based on the Governor's having signed SB 794 and AB 1849 on July 16, 1984. We will keep your Board advised of developments in our attempts to obtain some relief from these restrictions, but we believe it is only prudent at this point to assume that the restrictions will remain in effect -and this report, therefore, reflects the law as it exists today. B. The 1984-1985 Property Tax The Proposed Budget includes estimated Secured and Unsecured property tax revenue in the total amount of $74, 070,000 to be credited to the General Fund and $3, 497,000 to the Library Fund based upon an estimated increase in assessed valuation of about $11.9% from fiscal year 1983-1984. The County Assessor in a report to the Board of Supervisors on July 17, 1984 indicated that the gross local tax base increase is 10.2% above last year. The County Auditor-Controller has advised that after making allow- ances for estimated allocations to Redevelopment Agencies and recognizing property tax exchanges the property tax revenue included in the Proposed Budget for the General Fund should be decreased by $1, 158, 250 and for the Library Fund should be increased by $147,000. C. The Fund Balances as of June 30, 1984 The Proposed Budget includes fund balances in the total amount of $8, 796, 404 as being available for financing expenditures F: in fiscal year 198441985. This estimate is computed by projecting revenues received and earned and expenditures and encumbrances incurred for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1984. The fund balances are difficult to compute as there are many items which either must be accrued at year-end or for which a provision must be made to set aside money for County liabilities when finally determined. The County Auditor-Controller's staff have up-dated their calculations and their latest estimate is that the current estimates of fund balances will be about the same as included in the Proposed Budget with the exception of the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund which now is projected to be $170,750 lower than previously estimated. This reduced balance results from net expenditures being higher than previously projected. The balances available have been reduced, of course, by the provisions made for Special Reserves in the amount of $5.O million to be established to cover audit exceptions and potential liabilities arising from appeals and litigation. r. Board of Supervisors 7. July 20, 1984 D. State Budget Impacts on Health Services Programs 1. AB 8 County Health Services Fund. As we reported to your Board on July 10, 1984, the State Budget contains a 4.2% COLA for the AB 8 County Health Services Fund. . We have confirmed with the State Department of Health Services that Contra Costa County will receive $11, 067, 945 in AB 8 funds, $228, 897 more than is contained in the proposed County Budget. We are recommending that your Board not match these funds, thereby requiring your Board to hold a "60-40" hearing sometime this fall pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code Section 16705 . 2. Medically Indigent Services Account. As we reported to your Board on July 10, 1984, the State Budget contains a 3% COLA for the Medically Indigent Services Account. We have confirmed with the State Department of Health Services that Contra Costa County will receive $9,113, 626 in MIA funds; $265,445 more than is contained in the proposed County Budget. No County match is required for these funds . 3. Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Revenues. As we reported to your Board on July 10, 1984, the State Budget appears to contain sufficient COLA's for alcohol, ,idrug abuse, and mental health programs to cover the $1,100,000 included in the proposed County Budget. The State Budget includes a 3% COLA for all three programs plus an augmentation to the mental health base. The precise manner in which these funds will be allocated has not been developed by the State Department of Mental Health; thus, we can-!- not an-not precisely determine how much we will receive. We will continue to monitor this issueclosely to insure that appropriate actions are taken once we have final allocations. 4. Health. Services Enterprise Fund Balance. Earlier in the year the 1 83-1984 deficit was estimated to be in the range of $8, 000,000 to $8,200,000. When the funds from refinancing the County Administration Building and County Library were received, a net amount of $7, 764,000 was placed in the Enterprise Fund to cover the majority of the deficit, with the understanding that some additional funds might have to be appropriated if this amount was insufficient. Based on a review of the June 30, 1984 revenue and expenditures, it appears that an additional $396,900, will need to be provided to balance the Enterprise Fund for 1983-1984. The actual final figures will not be known until the County Auditor- Controller closes the 1983-1984 books next month, but both Health Services and the County Auditor-Controller believe the $396,900 figure is as accurate as it is possible to be this time. - ---0 ,G� ---- » Board of Supervisors 8. July 20, 1984 E. State Budget Impacts on Social Service Programs The best information we have at present continues to be that the increases in revenue for Social Services staff and the increased County funds required for matching state and federal funds for AFDC grants will very nearly offset each other as we reported to your Board on July 10, 1984. As was noted for mental health programs, the State Department of Social Services has not settled .on a method by which to allocate social services funds and there could be changes in this area. We will continue to monitor this issue closely and will recommend any actions necessary to insure that this budget remains balanced. F. Revenue and Expenditure Projections for the County's Investment Program Arrangements for the County' s $65.0 million short-term borrow- ing program were successfully concluded recently following extensive negotiations. The protracted period of negotiations required more extensive professional services than previously anticipated thereby increasing the cost of borrowing. Also, interest rates have continued to climb which increased the estimated cost of debt service. It is recommended that the current estimate of the cost of borrowing be increased by $204,000 to a total amount of $5, 190, 010 to reflect these factors. However, this increased expenditure requirement is more than off-set by additional interest earnings resulting from higher interest rates estimated at $500, 000. Total General Fund interest earnings are currently projected at $9, 825,000. The revenue and expenditures for debt service are difficult to predict as they are dependent upon interest rates and cash flow, however, we believe the projections are prudent and realistic. RECOMMENDATION It now appears that the Board has an additional $1. 9 million, in discretionary funds to allocate as seems appropriate. The task of allocating these funds will be very difficult when viewed in the context of a total of approximately $17 million At Issue items which are contained in the Proposed Budget and identifiable capital budget requirement of over $50 million. I have serious reservations about the County's ability to continue to provide all of the programs that the County is mandated to provide in a responsible manner. The County faces double jeopardy from the standpoint that it has an insufficient stream of revenue to finance local programs and almost no ability to raise additional revenues at the local level. - ------ -- -- - —- oil�1 � -- f " Board of Supervisors 9. July 20, 1984 Finally, it becomes readily apparent that when the above mentioned impact is combined with the possibility that additional restrictions will be placed on local government if Jarvis IV (Proposition 36) . passes in November, the result will be a pernicious impact on the County' s ability to continue to provide all of the services it is mandated to provide at a responsible level. It is recommended .that this report be referred to the Finance Committee to consider in conjunction with its review of the Proposed Budget. Respectfully, �� PHIL BATCHELOR, County Administrator FF/aa encl. - --- --- --CSC"" SUMMARY OF REVISIONS FISCAL YEAR 1984-1985 PROPOSED BUDGET I. Revisions Surplus Description Increase Decrease 1. Local Government Finance a. Supplemental Roll (Revenue) $2, 000, 000 b. Vehicle License Fund (Revenue) 5, 082, 000 C. Special District Augmenta- tion Fund P-6 (Revenue) $3,600, 000 Library (Revenue 2 ,053,000 (1) Library Service Area (Revenue) 100,000 Z. Property Tax Revenue Adjustment to Revenue Based on Roll a. General Fund (Revenue) 1, 158, 250 3. Estimated Fund Balance Federal Revenue Sharing Fund (Revenue) 170, 750 4. Health Services AB 8 (Revenue) 228, 897 0 MIA (Revenue) 265, 445 Fund Balance (Revenue) 396, 900 5. Social Service OCSS COLA (Revenue) 140, 250 AFDC (Revenue) 148 , 788 6. Investment Program Short-term Borrowing (Expense) -204, 000 Interest Income (Revenue) 500,000 TOTAL $7,863, 804 $7, 478, 900 NET SURPLUS $384 , 90, II. Discretionary Board Finance Policy Decisions: 1. Net Surplus $384 ,904 2. Net Retirement Adjustment 945,595 3. Overstated Sheriff-Coroner Budget 587,000 TOTAL .$1, 917, 499(2) (1)Adjusted to reflect increased property tax of $147, 000 thereby reducing the amount needed from the Special District Augmentation Fund. (2) In addition, the Board has the discretion to fund P-6 and the Library at less than 100% of what had been proposed which would increase this amount. -- ----- -- ---- - - - --- - -- --� 0®02®x: r •• _ ; ♦ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT To: Philip Batchelor, Date: County Administrator July 23, 1984 From: Patrick Godley,�Chief bo Subject: Financial Officer INDIRECT COST ALLOCATION A great deal of discussion has centered around the Department's method of allo- cating indirect expenses or more precisely the Department's method of "cost finding". Cost finding is generally recognized as the apportionment or allocation of the costs of non-revenue producing centers to each other and to revenue-producing centers on the basis of statistical data that measure the amount of service ren- dered by each center. Non-revenue producing cost centers such as Medical Records, Admitting, Chaplaincy, etc. which render service to revenue-producing centers such as Intensive Care, Psychiatric Services, etc. are allocated utilizing a "step down" method. This method gives recognition to the fact that the services rendered by certain cost centers are used by other cost centers both revenue and non-revenue producing. The Health Services Department utilizes an automated step-down program purchased from San Luis Obispo County in 1976 termed C.A.S.A. (Computer Assisted Statistical Allocation). CASA currently extracts expenditure data from the County Finance System. The statistics utilized to allocate the costs are manually input by Department staff. The primary purpose historically of CASA has been to provide the information necessary to meet the reporting requirements of the Medicare, Medi-Cal , California Health Facilities Commission and Short-Doyle Programs. Criticism of the allocation of indirect expenses generally revolves around the belief that these costs, in relationship to the direct expenses, are dispropor- tionately spread to the Psychiatric. Program. Attachment I and II are excerpts of the May, 1984 step-down. Attachment I shows that Inpatient Mental Health cost centers receive as a percentage of their direct expense, approximately 5% more than the Medical Services. Attachment II shows that Outpatient Mental Health cost centers receive, as a percentage of their direct expense, approxima- tely 11% less than the Medical Services counterparts. While a vast number of variables impact on the allocation process; e.g., adequacy of the square footage assignment, adequacy of the accumulation of gross charges, etc., the salient point of the attachments is there is no apparent material distortion of the indirect allocations between the Medical and Psychiatric Services. A-41 �J81 Qt�}Q ��S `t Phil Batchelor Indirect Cost Allocation 7/23/84 -2- It should be noted that the allocation process merely addresses the distribution of cost. It does not validate that the service/expenditure was provided in the most economical fashion possible. A second area of concern is the matching requirements of the AB-8 Program. To the extent that cost, direct or indirect, can be shifted from non-matchable programs; i .e., Mental Health to matchable programs; i .e., Regular Health, the Department's position is strengthened in terms of programmatic and financial flexibility. To date, we have been successful in shifting approximately $400,000 of indirects. This "shift" was accomplished primarily through the direct costing of Data Processing expense and a revision to the interest expense allocation. We are reviewing potential allocation revisions on a continuous basis but realistically must wait for implementation of the new billing system before we can have reliable statistical information to implement change. Indiscreet or unwarranted movement of cost without sufficient justification and documentation will be of little value at audit or in the management decision process. Accordingly, our goal is to provide accurate and meaningful financial information from which reasonable conclusions can be drawn. I am available at your convenience to discuss the contents of this report in greater detail . PG:cbc cc: William B. Walker, M.D. Stu McCullough C.L. Van Marter 000205 n w W S W W w W W W w W w W =1 O N1rm NNrr000OOOI'm l co C) O- LAO. O C V A W Nr =1 n 1--1 a r l In m r �i dw o x 1 WrJ r CD al a Ct? CICCCC CC C =i 3 O O C L- -n 'n W n 0 W ►+ a s 1 1--1 c-) - -1 -1 L_ 1 I 0e Iw 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 m --I r- rr-- cci� � -r cI I G) Mr. to = = ss 1 -4 azo -+ Ln in m m c m c a I r- 3> X ax m nn mmLnm I m Ln -0 Z xx n = M. mI= ►ten Xmm I X am a -i - na -4i? z 1 -0 in -0 N c 11 1 1 1 1 1 m a Ln r 0e m II V I N I ►+ I Ln I r I S r c z 11 - 1 - I1 I 'o a 1m Ln a .-, 11 w 1 0 1 co r+ I W I N A W V 0. 00 W N w 1 r 7J I� C O II Ln 1 0 1 V N I A 1 0 C rJ to 10 r -O O- V 1 rr -i a L ;n 11 W I Ln 1 co V 1 V 1 V Ln O 0` r A tF I= a) 1 w m S 1 1 m cn r- (n It .A 1 Cn I PJN I .O I VOdisO V %n OHO I Z a O -4 00 11 V I r t Cw 1 0. 1 PLnO- A O4A V O O 1 oe t? na 11 A I A I OA 1 O 1 w AO ALn W W OO- rJ 1 L -a+ z� 11 I I I I 1 En m -4 x 11 1 W -+ R= w m 11 1 1 t 1 1 cn m S T 11 1 1 1 I 1 C T_ m �•- -11 if I I 1 I I M 4-- M m m 11 Ln I 1 I A I 1 -O 6-1 -4 Z M x II r+ I Ln 1 rJ w t Ln I rJ rJ Js V W V r A I r n N C -0 It w 1 V 1 A W 1 CJI 1 01 r +� -O w -O r 01 C 1 " m .-+ n m 11 I l I I I m in W o z n 1 •0 1 0 ,0 1 PJ 1 Ln .a r+ 01 o. �1 :o •o O- A. I cn -< mLn w 11 V I Ln I UO I r I LJ10 -OO w01LD -OA A 1 00 m r) -4 11 W 1 -O 1 co I A 1 O O Ln w co A r+ CD W rJ 1 3> -� a G It 1 1 n r m II t I t 1 1 O O O It V 1 N l r1 Ln I in n .xo 11 I 1 - 1 - I r 1 --1 C 1 a n II co 1 0 1 -0 r 1 0o I N Ln W co V LD CJI N b I O a cn -I n II 0` 1 011 1 O 0- 1 0 1 0 a+ a N V LA V r V N I -1 -1 W I N F+ I W 1 CO ►+ r+ co O W Ln r+ A V 1 a m O G 11 I 1 . 1 1 Z a 11 Q- I a 1 C4 ►-` 1 ►+ 1 W A O. 0 O- Gn Ln lO O- w 1 r 11 d I V I W W I -,l I r- CJILnAArLn -OA A I 00 -I n 11 V 1 w I CO Ln I A 1 W A. Ln V W 1-i .9b co -o A 1 oat+ ii 1 I I 1 ' r r u 1 a r m 11 1 1 1 t 1 C O w If I t I I I L- n 11 N I 1 I rJ 1 r t CCf1 -al 11 01 I rJ I r+ r+ I W 1 rJ r rJ A r I --1 t+ m II r 1 Ln 1 0 A t O- 1 00 N A CO V A 1 S v C II 1 I 1 I I m 11 � 1 ►+ 1 C W 1 Cn I V �O O OD O CD 1 z n II V 1 Ln I W PJ 1 r+ I Ln O. O- co O W I -i O 11 rJ I V I V O I CA 1 0 W r co -O w m O W 00 1 to N If 1 1 1 1 v v 1 -4 I I 1 CAP 11 1 II co 1 rJ 1 r 1 T 1 r 1 C II - 1 - I I . 1 I 1-r n 11 r 1 0 1 %O r 1 0 1 w LA W co V co V rJ A 1 70 a -� 11 rJ 1 Co 1 1- V I w I O rJ A Lr OD co rJ r V A I m cn N 11 co I co I w Ln I -O I CO O r+ P- A rJ rJ ►-' A N 1 n a �+ II I l 1 1 v v v 1 --4 I e. 1 w N o- o v a Ln 10 0- r+ I It ►+ 1 w I V Ln I CO 1 0- 0 LA r ►+ O O- -0 A CO I It 10 1 O I Ln Ln 1 -0 1 W V A U N Co rJ co 0 N l 11 1 t 1 1 1 11 , II I I I ►+ I 1 11 Ln I A I r IJ 1 I r ►+ ♦-. r+ W 1 11 1 1 � • 1 . 1 v . . .. � 1 It w r+t 0 1 V N I W t W Ln V w G ►+ A -O 1 O a + It Ln I N I co A I w 1 0. 10 10 N o W o w Ln o 1 --I cn w If V 1 0- 1 ra A I o 1 0- C 00 W o Ln Ln 0. CO 0- 1 a s •► n o I N I o rJ 1 v 1 Z.1 Z, zn O• •o r cj ;D 1 11 W t 0- 1 f+ Ln 1 o- 1 W a r•J A Ln W -0 O FJ ►+ I 11 O l r l ►+ O 1 .O 1 0 V -o w N r O co W O- 1 11 I 1 1 1 I 11 1 n 1 1 1 t ► ►-+ � ii i i i i I n m a m Cr9 n n 11 m 1 -O 1 -O -o 1 co 1 V w V OO- COco 00. 0 l a m a = 11 co I N I LA O 1 v I O. O LA N Ln LA O r•J V Ln • I cn Z in 3 If t . I • I . I • • . . . 11 -O 1 V 1 ►+ -O 1 ON I O W O LA V W W Co- O r I m H Z ll w M A W I a+ 1 Ln O A Ln A O- >✓ N 0- O I Z -{ 1 K 1 61�41 %-e X h x ,e \ 1 -0 1 1 LJOO408 n � P N N a a a a s a a w w w w w w W s w W w w w w w w w w w 1 + O O -OV Pm Vvj 000-Omw V V m -OmmmmmmV V V m 1 _ -1 OP OOPN6n W N N.O NN N r Z Om VP a WON♦W m 1 m a i in, m N 1- s 1 -0 c x 1 -1 a�axo� �tnnas==ss �oa c+cl.+xc�minw1= W N r O Tr1•-I T m0M :K=K SxSOmr mmamms?+m mm a I C a c In<O S S T O x -1 2 Z s 9 Z m m 2 Z Z r 1 --I < a wOOSO nCl7mm�mm� a x mm wrm7p n-1-+-I y 1 S -+ .y a r x Ox r rnrnm r, CD M. as x 1 a a 0 0 0 7CIa OD•aw vIM w ►+T«+r as <Samarrr I --I n -I -y 1_ w r 0 w c m 7P.x-1 x f- Z Z m Z -1 r r r Z r I H -4 a a c n ocoso o m ix yr n-innn 1 m c r r w 2MarN mOma;;.o =nr.lm nn.mrn <<r r r 1 Z a 7CtQmm -�T r.� nM r- r, ►+ I -� r n m S O s in A C) w Ic 9 s n ►.►+ m C,r2 1 9 x m G) rr n O m [A a r+ -1 0 "0 z z z r r 1 m - In -0 Z m5 3> 1 < -4 IVZ N 4-I n. 3n ►.`+() nn 1 x a m Yn < n n- 1-1 I Z Ln O -4ns17) m n N n Nrr _0 I m rxn C S m Z CDm 2 m- + nnsN-IS + C) 7.1 Io) tits 2xN to 1 C --1 m I x in z 1 N m T C I1 I 1 1 t 1 m a N r - m 11 O I W 1 1 N 1 1 s r- = Z 11 - I I 1 1 == 1 a .c-1 to a - II W 1 V I r r W N W N V P W 1 P 1 N•O V tJ a O a r N 1 r 70 C o II V 1 Cn I r m V P m A V-O -O O•O m N N W P W 1 N I N O P a W P r O m W 1 -1 a s x+ I I W I W t r r N r -O A a N V m P-O m-O N a m I O l m •O W r N -O V W P P I m R+ x r c < 11 . I . 1 . . . - 1 m N r In 11 O I O I O W N V m O m V O P W O N W a O N 1 .O I r V a O w N a a Ln W 1 Z a O -r w A m O N r O r P m co O N V V W 1 W I V L" m 0- V W P P m I « w C)f s 11 V I N I W P m W Par P P m m r w N V N m I N 1 P P .O 1 O m N CO O N P 1 f- � = 0 11 1 I 1 1 i N m -i S 1 N -I O N m 11 1 I 1 1 1 N m S Z Il r 1 1 1 1 1 C 7C1 m r r. m m 11 N I N I 1 •O 1 r W z A x I I V 1 m I V N a V V I w V N a P 1 .O t W N P m N r O N W V 1 r n N �+ T I I N I O I P N N N P m a m O.0 0 a .O N t N l -O W a .0 a P V a r G 1 1 H m _ H n m II 1 1 1 I m co T O Z 11 N I W l a P P O rJ m N m W•O a V N N-O m I rJ + m V N r V V a a W r 1 N < m In H II v I tJ I N N w P m m N a W N m V V a m N I a I P m W a m -O rJ P N O 1 M m n -y 11 N I a 1 P V O• w V O- V a V W m V V A O N V I m I N a•O V r r r N V I a r m I CD n r m O r I 1 1 I O 0 0 11 O 1 a I 1 P 1 r r r 1 1 N n a II 1 ti O -1 a n II -O 1 W I r N a W r W N P "Pb 1 _P t N O m w V N rY W I O a N < n II a 1 W I r m N P-O O rJ P O Ln W P m V O P W 1 1 -O W N W P m N N T 11 .O I W 1 V W m m O I 1 C 11 '� 1 1 . 1 r •-' Z a II N I w I Ln Cn N(4-0(A �O `O.Owb N�O-j-4 w I r l 00 .ONr C.w�O �Od 1 r 11 I w I O rJPa 0 V Pm rJr 0. O• I m I W W N W N PNrJ N.O I M -1 N 11 -O I -O I -O W A O• W O m O W r G m O P V 0 to 1 0 1 m V W m N 0-.O�+ O w I a n I 1 1 1 1 a m + r r 1 a r m n 1 1 I 1 I o 0 to II f 1 1 t 1 L n 11' 1 1 1 t I C a 11 a I r 1 I W I N r a r 1 -1 r m 1 - -O O N W V V r N- 1 rn v O I I m V v r t 0 1 " 0. oa�J�-.-o,ow I z n u t I P m - a-�Pm r I o 1 u1PNwOPNm �14 t o n v v o o v 00 0 o P r m v a p N o 0 0 o .I a a P v o m a v w m � v v I N 1 II r I I 1 1 1 11 r l a 1 I P 1 r r r I O 11 0 t w I r r Na W w+W NP NPa 1 V I W Om W m NNr Nw II -O t N I r CO N P-O O N V O P W P m V O P W l a I O P W W O O W N N r 1 m In N 11 -O I r 1 V W r r J a O W r Nn OD r J Cn m r J N -O t V I N N m N W W r J•O I J A 1 n a v 11 I I 1 11 ti 11 O -O V W N O•O 0-O w I m I N P O P W N O P -O V 1 II W I N I rO NPa Or Nr.OrN PN N O. O- 1 m l b r O p V(). "Zo -O .O 1 I P ; P ; -O W V P W Om0- N- ODOm VQ N ; O i {nvaNO-V N V P ; 1 1 ' II Cn I N t 1 .p 1 r r N r 1 H n 11 .O I -O I rr N r rJ ww a-0w aw0 A P L" Vmr wa 1 O a �- II O I P I mO W mNP W W N'N-O W NmO.OP 1 1 1 Q. NNrNma -OwN 1 --itA w ' 11 O I O l wr PN V PNV maNrm6nAN•O I O I A NPN-ONNOO -_O p - 1 . 1 . .. . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 . . . . 11 m 1 P 1 Aa J. wpj NN mP V P OaO0 in I r l 0O V W OP.00-a I I t a 1 c o I N a O m f J m 0 m N N O O a I V I P O V V W N 0-O N m 1 11 r I m 1 14011).N O W O 0 a 0 0 m a V a N •O I W I A A m 0•O r N P N a 1 ' 11 1 1 1 1 1 �- 1 ' 11 1 I I 1 I A mM X9 - II a t w I N N N W W W N r N N N a N a a a V 1 a 1 W N a N a a N a a W 1 m Inn a II W I P t P r P r W W P V r N W O O N:0 P 1 V I 1.1" N.O w4 V m P 1 N z N •--' 11 I I . . 1 11 m --1 a 11 N t -O I O N V P•O O W V O.-O m 0. r -O a P 1 1 m.O V V O r r w I 0 II P r -O 10 A W N N r P N •O W V m N a a O m I I N N O a.O N N a v a 1 M 11 K 1 rt 1 >K K m rt N m X m K rt K re K re 12 K m 1 r► 1 re N m K K K re re m N 1 1 1 a x -• m m V 0 0:c)-i