HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09171979 - R 79I IN 3 1979
SEP EM
ER
MONDAY
THE BOARD Or SUPERVISORS MET IN ALL ITS
CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE
SECTION 24-2.1402
IN ADJOURNED REGULAR SESSION
AT ' 1: 30 p.m.
Monday, September 17, 1979
IN ROOM 107
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA
PRESENT: Chairman Eric H. Hasseltine, Presiding
Supervisor Tom Powers
Supervisor Nancy C. Fanden
Supervisor Sunne W. McPeak
ABSENT: Supervisor Robert I. Schroder
CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by
Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk
1
a
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Putter of Study of )
Operation of Fire Protection ) September 17, 1979
Districts . )
The Board in conjunction :with its public hearing to determine
the distribution of the County's Special District Augmentation Fund
for special districts and service areas , having considered the future
funding of fire protection districts within the County; and
Supervisor S. W. McPeak having commented that the Board would
be remiss in its responsibility to represent the voters and taxpayers
of this County if it did not explore every possibility for providing
services in a more efficient and economical way, and having recommended
that the Board take the following actions :
1 . Request the County Administrator, in consultation
with the Fire Chiefs and Fire Commissions to out--
line
ut-line and recommend to the Board of Supervisors by
November 20 , 1979 , a process for studying:
a. potential measures for effecting cost
savings in the provision of all aspects of
fire protection services;
b . the feasibility of consolidating fire districts
and the potential savings , if any, effected
through consolidai:ion;
c . the need, and if any, for modernizing and
expanding fire protection services in certain
regions of the County .
2. Board of Supervisors initiate by December 1, 1979, the
study to examine the issues outlined above pursuant to
the recommendations of the County Administrator;
3. Freeze all management positions within the fire services
and do not allow opera management positions to be filled
until the study can be completed. The County Administra-
tor may recommend to the Board of Supervisors an excep-
tion to this if there is a demonstrated need for public
safety at issue;
4 . Consider approach for provision of capital improvements
outlay funding; and
The following persons having appeared to comment on the
aforesaid recommendations :
Myron Bird, Commissioner, Kensington Fire Protection
District;
John Psi. Stiglich, United Professional Fire Fighters of
Contra Costa County, Local 1230 ;
Jessie White, President of Kensington Property Owner' s
Association;
Henry Clarke, General I%�anager, Contra Costa County
Employee's Association, Local No . 1 ;
Don M. Skinner, Fire Chief', 'Ioraga Fire Protection District ;
Albert V. Streuli , Fire Chief, Contra Costa County
` Protection District ;
Nick Papadakos , Fire Chief, Byron Fire Protection District ; and
S
1
1
Supervisor T. Powers having suggested that the Board
seek the cooperation of all districts, particularly autonomous districts,
in notifying the Board before making any management promotions; and
Board members having discussed the matter in some detail;
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of
Supervisor McPeak are APPROVED.
PASSED by the Board on September 17, 1979 .
CERTIFIED COPY
I certify that this is a full, true c correct copy of the
original document which is on fiit in my office,and that it
was passed fi adopwd by t:t_ Board of Supervisors of
Contra_G)sta Gras.: C:_-!:forma, on the date shown.
ATTEST.J.R.OLSSON',Cut:.^.:;Clerk .ex-officio Clcrk
of said Board of Supervisors, by Deputy Clerk.
SEP 17 1979
Diana M. Herman
cc : County Administrator
All Fire- Protection Districts
County Auditor-Controller
County Counsel
Director of Personnel
United Professional Fire Fighters of CCC, Local 1230
CCC Employee's Association, Local No. 1
,s
Monday, Sept. 17, 1979
1:30 p.m.
In the Matter of hearing on )
Proposed Budgets for County Special )
Districts, County Fire Protection )
Districts, and County Service Areas )
for distribution of the County's )
Special District Augmentation Fund. )
This being the time fixed for hearing on the distribution of
$11,477,059 for Fiscal Year 1979-1980 from the the County's Special
District Augmentation Fund for Special Districts, Couity Fire Protection
Districts, and County Service Areas, pursuant to Chapter 282, Statutes
of 1979, and the continued hearing on the proposed budgets for County
Special Districts and Fire Protection Districts; and
M. G. Wingett, County Administrator, having this day submitted
a report (a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated
herein) proposing allocations from the Special District Augmentation Fund
developed from a formula which attempted to treat districts within
priority areas in an equitable manner; and
Mr. Wingett having reviewed the proposals outlined in his report
and the Chairman having declared the hearing open, and the following
persons having appeared and commented with respect to the formula for the
distribution of the Augmentation Fund and the proposed budgets for various
districts:
Mr. Jack Christian - Kensington Community
Services District ;
Chief Vince Aiello - Riverview Fire Protection
District-
John Stiglich - President of United
Professional Firefighters
of Contra Costa County
Local 1230:
Chief Tom Birdwell - Rodeo Fire Protection District;
Chief A. V. Streuli - Contra Costa County Fire
Protection District ;
Chief Donald Markert - Kensington Fire Protection
District
Chief Michael Blodgett Danville Fire Protection
District
!asst. Fire Chief - San Ramon Fire Protection
Alex Starzee District
Chief Ray Morgan - Eastern Fire Protection
District
J. E. Taylor - Deputy Public Works Director,
Flood Control;
E.- H. Winslow - General Manager
Pleasant Hill Recreation and
Park Department
Edward Spencer - Ambrose Park & Recreation
District, Pittsburg
Jesse White — Kensington Property Owners
Association
Chas. Beasley Contra Costa Mosquito
Abatement District
F. C. Husley — Diablo Valley Mosquito
Abatement District.
Supervisor N. C. Fanden having commented that the Rodeo Fire
Protection District's budget includes substantial anticipated revenue
from the City of Hercules for services provided by the District and that
there now seems to be a question as to whether the District will actually
receive its anticipated funds from the City, and Supervisor Fanden having
suggested that this be taken into consideration when allocating augmen—
tation funds; and
Supervisor Hasseltine having commented that some of the Districts
had buildings constructed with community development funds and those Districts
are now faced with finding sufficient money to maintain the buildings, such
as Ambrose Park and Recreation District, and having advised that he would
meet with that District and go over its entire budget program; and
Supervisor Hasseltine having further commented that additional consideration
needed to be given to the Contra Costa Mosquito Abatement District inasmuch as its
budget had been compiled only on the amount the Manager had been advised was available
and not on the actual needs; and
Board members having discussed the matter in some detail and having expressed
concern that allocations were not adequate to cover capital improvements or necessary
expenses but that it appeared that all funds available, distributed in accordance with
the proposed formula, must be used to keep each district operating; and
Supervisor T. Powers having commented on the need for forth-3r
intensive study of the matter, recommended that the hearing be continued
to September 18, 1979 at 10:30 a.m.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is
APPROVED.
PASSED by the Board on September 17, 1979.
CERTIFIED COPY
1 certify that this is a full, true 4- correct copy of
the original document r.:nic!� i_-> on file in tnv office,
and that is was pstG:ed E trio^ter'. 9; t?+e Board of
Supervisors of Ccr.tra costa county. Ca"fornia, on
the date shown. AT-F.-ST: J. R. Oi SSo County
Clerk&exoffielo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors,
by Deputy Clerk. q
-_ - on 441q/ 71
! Board of Supervisors
. County Administrator ' Contra Tom Powers
is[District
Coun:./Administration Building Costa Nancy C.Fanden
Martinez. California 90553 2nd District
(415) 372-4080 County Robert I.Schroder
M. G. Wingett
�J 3rd District
County Administrator Sunne Wright McPeak
4th District
Eric H.Hasseltine
51h District
September 17, 1979
Board of Supervisors
Administration Building
Martinez, CA 94553
Dear Board Menbers :
Re: Proposed Allocations from Special District
Augmentation Fund
Following receipt of financial information on special districts
filed with you on September 11, 1979, the matter of distribution of
the $11,477, 059 set aside in the Special District Augmentation Fund
was referred to my office for recommendation.
An analysis has been made of fiscal data on file at the Office
of County Auditor-Controller in an attempt to arrive at an equitable
method of distribution of these funds taking into consideration the
priorities established by the Board of Supervisors_ The limited
information filed by many independent special districts render any
judgment of actual operating needs as expressed by budget requests
as unreliable.
It was therefore necessary to develop a formula which in
essence would afford a system which attempts to treat districts
within priority areas in an equitable manner. Regardless of the
procedure established, there is bound to be some dissatisfaction
as there simply is not adequate funding to cover all requests,
capital items and additional plant to provide for increasing
service demands.
The procedure followed used as a central theme the amount
transferred from special districts to the Special District
Augmentation Fund. These transfers were allocated back to the
districts from which transferred with certain adjustments which
seemed appropriate. The suggested distribution which reflects
certain assumptions and adjustments are indicated in Coluun 1 of
the attached schedule entitled "Comparative Data-Special Districts
Receiving Assistance. " The remaining columns show comparative data
which indicate that these districts will receive about $1. 1 Million
more than in fiscal year 1978-1979 from both the special assistance
and the apportionment of property taxes.
R
-2-
The procedure used for computing the distribttion embodied
the following concepts and assumptions:
I. The amount transferred from each district to the
Special District Augmentation Fund was credited
back to the district.
II. A separate amount was computed which was made
available to other priority needs on the following
basis:
1. The amounts allocated last year to special
districts which are now being funded
through other means including lighting
districts, Contra Costa Flood Control and
Service Area LIB-13 .
2. Districts which have available resources
which exceed budget requests by $20,000
from the Special District Augmentation Fund.
This procedure was followed in that it does
not seem appropriate to have substantial
amounts of surplus monies seting in
certain districts while others are having
to cut back.
3. The total available for redistribution resulting
from steps 1 and 2 above total $715,578.
III.The unique financial needs of the Kensington Community
Services District which essentially operates a municipal
police force was recognized by funding at a 90 percent
level which is similar to the financing of many county
departments. A surplus remaining in the recreation
area of this district in the amount of $15,276 was also
transferred to the police function; the remainder to
attain the 90 percent funding level of $104,993 was
transferred from the surplus available for redistribution.
IV. The remainder of $610,585 available for redistribution
was allocated to those fire protection districts whose
total financial resources are short by $5,000 or more
in meeting budget requests computed on the basis of the
original transfer to the Special District Augmentation
Fund. The use of the budget shortage as a base is not
valid in view of the varied requests made for special
purposes. On this basis 12 districts shared in the
redistribution.
7
-3-
-The schedule of Comparative Data shows the result of the above
calculations upon each district in priority categories in Column 1.
General Comments
As you have noted there are not county general fund monies
proposed for transfer to special districts. The county is hard
pressed to meet its own financial obligations for countywide services.
It is not considered appropriate or desirable that monies needed for
county services be transferred to furnish special services and
amenities for particular areas.
Adoption of a procedure for county subsidization of special
districts will establish a precedent which will be very difficult
to terminate. Furthermore, preliminary long-term projections for
county financing appear quite dismal especially with the Federal
Revenue Sharing program in danger.
It is necessary that fire protection districts understand the
financial restrictions being faced as available resources continue
to diminish and they must cooperatively work toward economies which
can be achieved through consolidations and central pooling and use
of available resources and facilties.
The assistance to police service districts was included in the
distribution with some reluctance as it is recognized that with the
possible exception of Kensington this is a layer of special service
above that provided by the Sheriff. However, there is no additional
funds paid by the residents who benefit from these special services.
Funding for fiscal year 1979-1980 was included to allow time for
possible implementation of a special tax for police and fire services
following a 2/3 vote of approval by district voters. Such a proposal
should be placed before electors for the police services and also
for fire services where it is the opinion of the Fire Commissioners
or Board that funding under the present system is inadquate. The
residents of the district will then have the opportunity to express
themselves as to the desirability of maintaining these police
services and fire service levels.
As for parks and recreation services and cemetery districts,
it seems appropriate that these districts take the necessary steps
to becoming self-sufficient through greater use of fees, service
charges and benefit assessments or special taxes. Park and
recreation--although highly desirable--are of benefit to a specific
area and efforts should be made that their financial support be
provided by the area residents.
U
r
-4-
The approval of Proposition 13 is exerting increasing
financial pressure on local government. It is essential that we
take all possible steps to achieve economies in providing services.
If such service levels deteriorate to a point where such service
is no longer effective after taking all economy measures available,
then the matter should be presented to the electorate to determine
if they wish to pay for these services in order to maintain them
at a level considered adequate.
Respectfully,
M. G. WINGETT,
County Administrator
MGW:lm
Attachment
9
COMPARATIVE DATA
SPECIAL DISTRICTS RECURRING ASSISTANCE
1979 - 80 1978 - 7- 9
District Allocation Property Total State Property Total Increase/
from Sp. Distr. Tax Financial Tax Decrease
Aug. Fund Allocation Assistance Allocation 1979-80
Fire Protection
Bethel Island 47,492 40,886 88,378 41 ,051 35,736 76,787 11 ,591
Brentwood 56,971 38,762 95,733 47 ,594 30,837 78,431 17,302
Byron 21 ,973 15,453 37,426 17 ,584 11 ,777 29,361 8,065
Byron, Zone I 24,913 24,913 - 15,321 15,321 9,592
Moraga 543,540 382,501 926,041 527 ,624 375,427 903,051 22,990
West County 555,444 414,468 969,912 515,806 389,060 904,866 65,046
Eastern 53,638 34,551 88,189 46,527 30,294 76,821 11 ,368
Oakley 50,861 35,024 85,885 39,406 27,436 66,842 19,043
Orinda 763,102 520,553 1 ,283,655 719,602 496,281 1 ,215,883 67,772
Pinole 64,840 49,901 114,741 68,752 50,386 119,138 ( 4,397)
Riverview 1 ,689,021 1 ,291 ,323 2,980,344 1 ,732 ,619 1 ,339,294 3,071 ,913 ( 91 ,569)
Tassajara 16,567 10,042 26,609 13 ,422 7 ,750 21 ,172 5,437
Contra Costa 5,081 ,842 3,950,198 9,032,040 4,700,717 3,694,191 8,394,908 637 ,132
Crockett-Carquinez 39,261 25,786 65,047 36,412 24,177 60,589 4,458
C.S.A. - F-1 2,991 2,163 5,154 3,189 2,196 5,385 { 231 )
Kensington 268,659 186,069 454,728 273,521 191 ,487 465,008 { 10,280)
Danville 1 ,078,606 770,270 1 ,848,876 944 ,287 681 ,913 1 ,626,200 222,676
Rodeo - 211 ,108 211 ,108 177 ,476 128,976 306,452 ( 95,344)
San Ramon 360,028 263,491 623,519 250,656 198,725 449,381 174,138
10,694,836 8,267,462 18,962,298 10,156,245 7,731 ,264 17,887 ,509 1 ,074,789
Police
C.S.A. - P-1 (Crockett) 7,042 4,996 12,038 7 ,543 5,097 12,640 ( 602)
C.S.A. - P-2 (Danville) 50,578 39,982 90,560 47 ,753 35,959 83,712 6,848
C.S.A. - P74 (Orinda) 46,452 36,086 82,538 47 ,753 35,337 83,090 ( 552)
C.S.A. - P-5 (Round-Fill ) 25,442 19,957 45,399 24,453 18,270 42,723 2,676
Kensington Comm. Serv. 234,575 108,686 343,261 132,985 111 ,859 244,844 94,817
Diablo Comm. Serv. 11 ,362 8,845 20,207 10,631 7 ,882 18,513 1 ,694
375,451 218,552 594,003 271 ,118 214,404 485,522 108,481
fa
COMPARATIVE DATA
SPECIAL DISTRICTS RECEIVING ASSISTANCE
1 9 7 9 - 8 0 1 9 7 .8 - 7 9
District Allocation Property Total State Property oto Increase/
from Sp. Distr. Tax Financial Tax Decrease
Aug. Fund Allocation Assistance Allocation 1979-80
Mosquito Abatement
Contra Costa 31 ,992 258,008 290,000 151 ,698 243,465 395,163 { 105,163)
Diablo Valley 34,499 48,580 83,079 52,945 38,585 91 ,530 8,451}
66,491 306,588 373,079 204,643 282,050 486,693 ( 113,614)
Recreation & Parks
C.S.A. - R-5 (So. Danville) 1 ,741 4,671 6,412 1 ,752 4,479 6,231 181
C.S.A. - R-7 (Alamo-Danville) 36,676 244,794 281 ,470 32,057 203,715 235,772 45,698
C.S.A. - M-16 (Clyde) 300 1 ,626 1 ,926 300 1 ,548 1 ,848 78
C.S.A. - M-17 (Montalvin Manor) 8,514 28,911 37,425 26,785 29,125 55,910 ( 18,485)
Kensington 4,896 19,180 24,076 12,346 19,740 32,086 ( 8,010)
Rollingwood 2,503, 4,214 6,717 2,683 4,300 6,983 { 266)
Pleasant Hill 208,930 311 ,055 519,985 219,794 311 ,695 531 ,489 ( 11 ,504)
Green Valley 1 ,898 4,052 5,950 2,020 4,107 6,127 (. 177)
Ambrose 36,294 53,765 90,059 40,477 57,105 97 ,582 { 7 ,523)
Brentwood 19,452 23,715 43,227 14,027 16,330 30,357 12,870
321 ,204 696,073 1 ,017 ,247 352,241 652,144 1 ,004,385 12,862
Cemetary
Alamo Lafayette 14,104 18,342 32,446 13 ,494 16,712 30,206 2,240
Byron-Brentwood-Knightston 4,973 18,062 23 ,035 4,223 14,610 18,833 4,202
19,077 36,804 55,481 17 ,717 31 ,322 49,039 6,442
Total 11 ,477,059 9,525,079 21 ,002,108 11 ,001 ,964(1 ) 8,911 ,184 19,913,148 1 ,088,690
(1 ) Does not include districts and service
areas which were not supplemented in
F.Y. 1979-80; namely, lighting, C.C. Flood
Control and Service Area LIB 13.
, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS
Items Incl. in Budget Request
Actual Distr, Reserve Autos.
Expend. Budget Begin Property Other Total
---- G. D. �-Nat For Capital & Bldgs. �
District
1978-1979 Request Balance Tax Kamennoo Resources Shortage Aug._9o�nd� Shortage Cont��y _R_os_e_r_v-m' Trucks
Land
Count), Fire protection Districts
'
Bethel
Island $106,I79 $21Q^28 $I,938 $40^886 --- $42,324 $170,461 $47,492 $132,969 --- --- %95,000
Brentwood 74,945 74^Q4G l02,86 lg'�7l 38,762 --- 5O^33� 4406 S8/97l [439l
Brent. Capital
Outlay Ras. 12,08/U l3,OOn( $12,000
Byron 30^950 30^I05 372 15,453 --- 15,025 20^280 2I*973 [1,693)
Cul). Out. Rms, 3^523 385 305 --- --- 305 --- ---
Zone l --- 30,000 15,823 24^9I3 --- 40^736 (10,736) --- (I8"736) $20,430
Noruga 887,135 1"147,400 90^093 382^501 $30^000 502,594 644,806 543,540 101,266 $52^500 50*008
�
West County 958,548 1,275,I00 270,183 414^468 --- 684,650 590^450 555,444 35^006 100,000
Eastern 72»931 111^32 3,292 34"551 --~ 37,843 73,48 53^638 19^844
Oakley 63^360 I26,69 8,38 3�,O34 --- 43,2O8 O3^4O 50,861 37^546 67^000
Cup. Out. Res. --- 16,OOlI^0O0/ --- 11,000 5,000/ 18,000
Orindn 1*2I2,800 1,416,53 0.1 520/E53 --- 643,328 7731202 703,102 10^108 24,400
Cop, Out. Res, l2l^8O»( I2I^600 --- --- 121/600 --- --- 15,000
Pinole 109,322 155,257 39^23 49/001 --- 89,125 66'132 64^840 1^292 14,I21
Riverview 3,044,339 3,754`663 297^0I 1,291,323 127^000 1^715^340 2,839^323 I^689,021 350,302 32,870 73,800 60,000
Cup, Out. Rms. --- 4OB'044.( 60,08 80,080 348,564 --- 348^S64 300^094 48^470
Tusso'aru I6^644 39,513 5^102 10,042 --- 16^144 14,368 I6^567 [3`199) 1 `000 4 ,593
Contra Costo 9,025^175 10^228'506 402/430 3,950,198 2491000 4,601,628 5^626,878 6^08I,842 545,036 25,000 234^300
Crockett- Carq, 61p562 76'793 5,801 25,786 --- 31,587 45,212 39^261 5,951
CSA F-1 4,854 --- 1,7S4 2,163 --- 3,917 2,991
'[[/CAL
COUNTY $I5^771^283 I9^282,591 $1,476,623 $6*836^524 x406,800 $8^719*147 10^643^444 $8*987^543 $I^555,901 $135,491 $312^094 667,762 Q130,430
^ \ ^l
/ �(~
.~
SPECIAL DISTRICTS
Items Incl. in Budget Request
Actual R d Oudt 1979-1980 Distr. Reserve Autos
Expend. Budget Begin Property Other Total BudgetS.D. Net For Capital & D16Qs. &
District 1878-1978 Request Balance ` Contge2.' Reserve _lJftl�-____
'- � - _
Independent Fire Protection Distri ts
Kensington $477'359 $564'436 $52,300 x186"089 $2,700 $241^069 $323,356 $208,659 $54^697 $6,0V0 $5,008
Rodeo 361^596 462,676 113,853 2I1*108 225`615 550'576 (87'900) --- (87^900)
Danville 1^766^0I2 2,027,000 2.6^008 770^270 3,700 708,970 I^228,030 1`078,606 149^424 $30,000 $40,000
73 OOU
Cop. Out, Baa. I7^462 73^000 --- --- 73,000 --- --- --- ^
San Kumon 489^764 ' 50^882 383^49I --- 314,293 1,053^457 3�S^&2S 707^633 30,000 8,500 610,000
Cup. Out, Res. --- 25,000 --- 25^000 25^008
Zone l --- ,750' 35 3O8 I6��39 --- Sl���' 14,203 I4 2O3 ---
-~ �
?O7A|,
INDEPENDENT $1 /3,000 $38,500 $550,000
1IyT&L PlR2
PRO7CC'|'ION $18,883,456 $23,848,592 $1,827,886 $8,284,101 �637,01510,749,002 13,099,590 10,694,836 $680,430 Police Protection
County Police Protection
CSA 11-1 37 �l4'6OO �l,3BG �4^99G --- �b,392 �8,3O8 �7^U42 :l^l66
CSA p-2 'Oonnill�' $O7' l76 90'572 I'S80 39,082 --- 41,551 49,021 50,578 (1'557) $4,000
CSA P-4 (Danville)
' 87^ 176 87,572 (I/067) 36^086 --- 35^019 52,553 46,452 6*101 1,000
CSA P-S [Round
'Hill) 44,58U8 40,536 19,967 ��� l9,17l 27,305 35 ,442 1 ,92C3 5OO
TOTAL COUNTY
POLICE ---_-_ 1102,133 113/,1^L7 $1£�,514 _$7,633 j�,500
���
Independent Police Districts
Kensington Comm. '
��,5OU
�ern. (85%) $316`297 $404,431 $20^139 $108^886 --- $128^826 $275^886 $234*575 $41^031 $20,080
Diablo Comm, (l) .
N.A.
SaTv, (50%) N.A. 20,207 8 84S 8 B4S lI 362 '' 11 ,362 ---
-- ' 7O�7\L INDEPENDENT ' $316,297 $424,638 $20,139 $il7,531
'
TOTAL POLICE
PROTECTION $549,974 $663,91.8 $21 ,251 $218,552 $5,
�l]
Balancing amount - Budget information not known. 2
/
r SPECIAL DISTRICTS
FISCAL YEAR 1979-1980
Items' Incl , in -Budget Request
Actual _ Proposed Budget - 1979-1980 Reserve Autos.
Expend. Budget Begin Property Other Total Budget S.D. Net For Capital & Bldgs. Fi
District 1978-1979 Request Balance Tax Revenue ' 'Resources Shortage Aug. Fund Shortage Contgey, Reserve Trucks Land
Mosquito Abatement
Contra Costa $379,178 $405,900 $135,900 $258,008 $393,908 $11,992 $31,992 ($20,000).
Diablo Valley 69,765 95,000 31,921 48,580 80,501 14,499 34,499 (20 000)•
TOTAL $448,943 $500,900 167,821 306,588 $474,409 $26,491 $66,491 ($40p000),
Parks & Recreation
County Service Areas
R-4 (Moraga) $37,845 $51,822 $12,094 $2,016 $370800 51910 ($88) --- ($88).
R-5 (South Danville) 6,478 11,397 8,610 4,671 --- 13,281 (1884) $1,741 (3,625) $1,036
R-6 (Orinda) 422,667 416,799 40,126 61,294 3050000 406,420 10,379 --- 10,379 20,500 $46,369
R-7 (Alamo-Dan.) 515,625 860,300 279,108 244,794 110,000 633,902 226,398 36,676 189,722 25,000 703,175
R-8 (IV�ilnut Creek) 188,355 588,564 102,947 59,617 414,684 577,248 11,316 --- 11,316 479,272
R-9 (I:1 SoUrante) --- 303,278 --- --- 303,278 303,278 --- - --- 303,278
11-1 (Crockett) --- 212,513 --- --- 212,513 212,513 --- --- -- 212,513
M-8 (Byron) 18,965 40,922 40,922 --- --- 40,922 --- ---
NI-16 (Clyde) 3,298 8,457 473 1,626 60687 8,786 (329) 300 (629) 2,500
1.I-17 (Montalvin
Manor) 210,315 276,945 182,596 28,911 76,924 288,431 (11,486) 8,514 (20,000) 101 ,327
LIB-11 (Oakley) --- 76,238 3,976 --- 72,262 761238 --- --- --- 76,238
TOTAL COUNTY 1,403,548 , 2,847,235 , 670,852 402;929 $1,539,148 $2,612 929 , 234,306 $47,231 $187,075 46,536 $1 ,924,672
l �
'.
'
' SPECIAL DISTRICTS
-
FISCAL YEAR 1979-1980
Items Incl. in Budget Rmjuest
Actual ^ ^ 1979-1980 Distr. Reserve ""`""`_8x_pan_d_^ _ Budget Begin Property Other - Total Budget S.D. Net For Capital & Bldgs,°
District 1978-1979 Request Balance Tao Revenue Resources Shortage Auc. Fund Shortage Cohtgey. Reserve Truck Land
6
Parks (continued)
~
.Independent Districts
� ---
Kensington
-
_
~-^~ ^�^~ ' �^~ ~/ ~^6,4�3 �24,U76 $19^180 $19,180 $4^896 $4,896
uo/lzoQVuod10"200 12^630 $6"259 4^2l4 ��^0OO l�"47� [3^D43l 2^SO3 ($5,34
6)
' ^~~" ^"` ^^lll 821"259 8S8 000 l-O"OOO 3I1"055 29^640 660'89G 207^30S 208,930 1^625
$25,008 $3S^000
Gruen Valley 8,2G7 l4^28O(l) 8,330 4`052 --- l2"383 1^898 1$898
--
Ambrose ' 370^782 176,595 39*776 S3,765 10,400 I03^941 72,654 36,294 36`360
._ Brpptwood . , 19,445 84,150 33,114. 23,775 --- S6,889 27,261 19,452 7,809
-125,000
TOTAL INDEP80D8NT $416,041 ��� $8S8,5603 �� $273� , � $17-�, ' $25,000 --�
TOTAL PARKS AND ---- �
RECREATION �1, /9 ,188 $3.471 ,489. $545,477 , ,204
�-�
r
uom�om�tos��
Alamo-l.ufuyctt $58,472 $16,411 $I8^343 $3`750 $38,503 $33/507 $I4 ' 104 x9,403
Dyrun-8rmntwood-
KniQhtsan 50,754 67,650 9,945 18,062 35,000 �3 OU7 4 843 4 373
TOTAL CONO78RY ' $101,51 � $28,150 $19,077 ,073�
^
(1}
Balancing amount - Budget request not known.
~
,
` / l
� .
�
�
And the Board adjourns to meet on Sentember 18:', 1979
at 9: 00 a.m. , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, County
Administration Building, Martinez, California.
E. H. Hasseltine, Chairman
ATTEST:
J. R. OLSSON, Clerk
164�
Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk
30
The preceeding documents contain pages.
f