Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MINUTES - 07271978 - R 78J IN 1
187 178 The following are the calendars prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator, and Public Works Director for Board consideration_ 001001 JAMES P.P&NNY.RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE 80.1RD OF SUPERVISORS ROBERT 1.SCHROOER 1 ST DIS•RIOT _ CHAIRMAN i� NANCY C.FAHOEN.MARTINEZ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY T I.�j ERIC H.HASSELTiNE 2NO DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN ROBERT 1.SCHROOER.LAFAYSTT- AND FOR JAMES R.OLSSON.COUNTY CLERK 3RD JIsTRICT - AND EER OFFICIO CLERIC OF=.i±BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORo SPEdAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD AND GERALDINE RIUSSELL ATH.DISTRICT 90ARD CHAI+aCFM ROOIM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CHIEF CLERK ERIC H.HASSEL-.INE.PrrrssuRG r.o.sox 931 PHONE tat 5)372-2371 5TH DISTRICT MARTINEE=CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY JUNE 27, 1978 The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9: 00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Service Pin Awards. Consideration of the Public Works agenda. Consideration of the County Administrator's agenda. Consideration of "Items Submitted to the Board. " 9:30 A.M. As Ex Officio the Board of SuDervisors of Contra Costa County Storm Drainage Distric�, hearing on proposed dissolution of Drair-ape Zone ?9A, -Oakley area; and As Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors o= Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation- District, accept conveyance of property located in former Storm Drainage District 29A. Hearing on proposed Amendment No. b to Flood Control Zone 3B project, Lone_ Pine-Galindo Creek. Hearing on proposed amend-_-- ant to the County General Plan for the South Ygnacio Valley area. Hearing on recommendation of San Ramon Valley Area Planning Co.=issio:� =7i th respect to request of Citation Builders (2200-RZ) to rezone land in the San Ramon area and approval of Preliminary Development Plan. If approved as recom anded, introduce ordinance, waive reading and fix July f, 1978 for adoption. Hearing on appeal of Danville Estates Homeowners Association from San Ramon Valley Area Planning Co= ssion conditional approval of L.U.P. ;=2040-78, Danville area (Kenneth and Patricia Thomas, owners) Executive Session as required or recess. Consideration of reports of Board Committees including Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden) on Retirement Contribution Rates and establishment of Enterprise Fund for County Medical Services; and 1:30 P.M. Public workshop session to revieD� 'reports _pertaining to health care and menial health services, including the- reports of Dr. Paul O'Rourke and the State Depar-L.-ment of Health' s =.edical/legal review team. 00002 Board of Supervisors` Calendar, continued June 27, 1978 ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ITEC-- CONSENT 1. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll and cancellation of certain delinquent penalties. 2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 78-42 (introduced June 20, 1978) rezoning land in the Alamo area, 2171-RZ, and repealing Ordinance No. 78-39. 3. FIX July 18, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of El Sobrante Community Association(Ivan Goyak and George Vila, owners) from County Planning Commission conditional approval of Subdivision 53.08, E1 Sobrante area. 4. FIX July 25, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Arthur Reinsteir_ from San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission conditional approval of Minor Subdivision 226-77, Tassajara area (Victor L. Lund, Jr. , applicant) . 5. FIX July 25, 1978 at 1:30 p.m. for hearings on the -following planning matters: Appeal of The Hofmann Company from County Planning Commission conditional approval of Subdivision 5353, Byron area; and County Planning Commission recomaendation with respect to proposed amendment to the County General Plan for the West Pittsburg area (Shell Chemical Property) . 6. FIX august 1, 1978 for hearing on recommendation of County Planning Commission with respect to request of William J. _ ,. Elizondo (2213-R7-) to rezone land in the Oakley area. 7.' INITIATE proceedings and fix August 8, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on proposed Orinda Open Space Boundary Reorganization annexation to the East Bay Municipal Ultility District, County Service Areas R-6 and P-4. 8. INITIATE proceedings and approve proposed annexation No. 78-6 to County Service Area L-42, without hearing or election. 9. AUTHORIZE legal defense for persons who have so requested in connection with Superior Court Action Nos . 182846 and 187809. 10. DENY the claims of Denice Hughes and Ddy a 'Richardson, Jerry and Lola Vargas, Guirguis N. Guirguis, George Martinez, James E. Wortham, Carol Ann and Lillian Boss, and the amended claim of Opal Hammer. ITEMS 11 - 19: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) 11. CONSIDER adoption of resolution revising County Planning Department fee schedule in accordance with Board' s determina- tion of June 16, 1978. ADOPT RESOLUTION 12. MEMORAINDUM from Director of Planning recommending reallocation of $37, 000 of contingency funds in the County's Fourth. Year Community Development Program to offset administrative costs of cities. APPROVE RECOMMENDATION 0 1 Board of Supervisors ' Calendar, continued June 27, 1978 13. ' LETTER from Administrator, Los Medanos Community Hospital, outlining the circumstances surrounding the position of the Hospital District relative to the passage of Proposition 13 and requesting an opportunity to present said position in more detail when the Board of Supervisors deliberates the allocation of tax revenues. REQUEST CLERK TO ASSIGN TIME FOR PRESENTATION AT A REGULAR OR SPECIAL MEETING WHEN FINANCING OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS FROM STATE SURPLUS FUNDS IS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 14. MEMORANDUM from County Counsel responding to Board referral of letter from Attorneys Richard Chernick and William H. Levit seeking the County' s written agreement that said letter, together with enclosures, constitutes full compliance with any applicable claims requirements of the County, and recommending that the Board neither accept nor reject the letter as a claim but return it unexecuted. APPROVE RECOMMENDATION 15. . MEMORANDUTINI from Director of Planning transmitting Resolution No. 49-1978 adopted by the County Planning Commission which certifies that the Draft EIR and response document for the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan were completed in accor- 'dance with CEQA and State and County- guidelines and which suggests mitigation measures to lessen project impacts. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT; HEARING ON PLAN IS SCHEDULED FOR JULY 252 1978 AT 9:30 A.M. 16. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission, advising that the Commission feels that it should play a vital role in coordination of park and recreation activities and natural resource protection in the County but that consideration of an expanded role should be withheld until the effects of Proposition 13 are clear. ACM10[1'i:EDGE RECEIPT 17. APPROVAL No. 78-13 adopted by the State Solid Waste Management Board approving _"Notice of Designation of Local Enforcement Agency," submitted by the County Health Department to carry out provisions of the Z'berg-Kapiioff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT 18. LETTER from Mr. Keith Howard, on behalf of Board of Directors of the Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum, requesting that an annual allotment of $10, 000 per year be made to the Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum Wild Life Rescue program out of the fund for the propagation and conservation of fish_ and game established pursuant to the State Fish and Game'-Cbde. REFER TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 19. LETTER from Mr. Ted Sutton requesting that the County relinquish development rights granted by the previous owner (M.S. 79-76) to permit consideration of a three lot subdivision in the Lafayette area. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FOR REPORT ITEMS 20 and 21: INFORitiIATION (Copies of communications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 20. LETTER from Executive Vice President, Associated Building Industry of Northern California, Eastern Division, commenting on proposal to increase County Planning Department fees, requesting that services be available in a professional and timely fashion so there are no unnecessary delays in the application process, and urging that action be taken to streamline and improve the development process. 00004 - -Bo2rd� of Supervisors' Calendar; ' continued June 27, 1978 21. LETTER from Washington Representative, County Supervisors Association of California, transmitting for- Board consideration proposed legislation (Agricultural -Land Retention Act) which would create an Agricultural Land Review Commission and provide for demonstration programs upon application to the Secretary of Agriculture from counties and other governmental jurisdictions . Persons addressing the Board should. comolete the form roviee on t_ a rostr-,L-- and furnish t1-Le C erk wick a =.written copy ot their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA- l EMIS: WEDN'ESDAY, 5 :00 P-M. _ NIfE7TTNGS OF BOARD COKKT';' -r S The Fina-ice Conittee (Supervisors E. H. Rasseltime and N. C. Fanden) Ni11 meet regislarly on .each. `Monday at 9 :30 a.m. in Room 108, County. Administration Buil dung, ia=tinez, and on .3ednesda7 if necessary. The internal Operations• Comwi twee (SLpe=if sons W. N. Boggess and J: P. -;) " ^eat an t^e ?sr- and 3rd Mondays of each north at 9: 30 a.m. in the Administrator' s Conference Room, County Administration Building. -IOTIC-c OF �ETI* GS OF P-.j7.LTC IINTEREST (For additiCr-al .'.n;Q.;u.rE' p?ease D!:O_^e tL'_G IZL'���= ?:1Gr.CZ�Zd) SanFra-q.c±SCO• Bay Corse Vatt O« and DeV?l o7Li�;?t CC?:? 12Ss�0:? h. 557-3086 lst and 3rd Thursdays Oi t 3T_C_.th -- p+=0=�� g,sSJCia, C:I of Bay 11.rea Go've'r-nm?i:t5 3rd^i11Lt3'SC-iaV 0= the. Wont, - phone 8 41-9730 East .B-1 Regional Farms Dis,rlc. �JL and 3rd Tuesdays of the r'GTitt! - D',^,'J:?e .5'1- c13O0 Bay Area ,g i i• pollution Control Dli s t r C�+ - 1st, 3rd and 4-h Wedr_esdaYs o� the moot ozone 77?-6OOO Nets OBOi�ita_n TT_'rnsnCr tali On CC.^..►:_ .SSiO 4th cC W e nsdav of the r,.ont - pno«a 8-14c,-1223.3. ti. .;.,. •y.L'nLS G Cos,a Cou n y I at - �;St_�C`. . 0- -he saS51C'IS all O`..Cni Ist and 3_d ;.'ednesday3 u Wednesdays - phone 682-5950 OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR { CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions June 27, 1978 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: Department From To Human - Manpower Analyst- Administrative Analyst- Resources Project, -Ol to Project (Manpower) air 15 2. Additions and cancellations of positions as follows: Department Addition Cancellation Civil Servica I Account Clerk I (PSE) Project Sheriff- 1 Senior Sheriff' s - Coroner Dispatcher Civil Service I Clerk-CETA 1 Typist Clerk-Trainee, u01 (PSE) 1 Youth Project 1 Typist Clerk Trainee-CETA Aide-CETA (20/40) 1758 1 Youth Project Aide-CETA (20/40) 4r03 II. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATIONS None. III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS 3. Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court_ Add $9 ,380 to the Mt. Diablo Municipal Court for the costs of unanticipated assignment of judges by the California Judicial Council. . 4. County Clerk (Special Elections) . Add $23 , 270 for increased processing expenditures which will be reimbursed to County. t '�,` i Too. Board of Supervisors " From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 6-27-78 Page: 2. III. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS - continued 5. County Administrator (Plant-Acquisition) . Appropriate additional federal grant of $14,750 to construct improve- ments for handicapped. 6.' Superinter_dnet of Schools. Add $1,875 for installation of fire alarm system for Educational Mediae Center., 7. Oakley Fire Protection District. Add- $1.,255 from district funds to replace damaged fire hydrant. 8. Internal Adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for following budget units: Sheriff (Communications) , Auditor Controller (Office Services) , District Attorney, District Attorney (Family Support) , County Clerk, County Administrator (Plant Acquisition) , Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Health, Manpower, Auditor-Controller (Data Processing) , Probation. IV. LIENS AND COLLE1C=2.%S None. V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS 9. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between -County ,and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount. Period (a) Boeing Computer Extend contract for - Extension from Services, Inc. coding and testing 4/28/78 to Martinez Data 5/31/78 Processing Center input and processing programs (Law and Justice System) (b) James M. Assistance with $450 5/12/78 - Harcourt state claim for 12/31/78 AB 3121 (c) Citv of Area Agency on $5,170 3/1/78 - Antioch Aging Project, 6/30/78 Senior Drop-in - .. Center 0000. 7 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 6-27-78 Page: 3. V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS - continued 9. Agency . Purpose Amount Period (d) Schools of Law: Work study program $10,635 7/1/78 U.C. Berkeley for law students 6/30/79 II.C.. Davis Hastings McGeorge Golden Gate (e) East -County Alcoholism Program. $6,150 5/1/78 Community Contract Amendment increase 6/30/78 Detoxification to provide alcohol Center services to East County Spanish- . speaking persons (f) We Care Mental Health $11,000 5/1/78 - Society, Inc. contract amendment increase 6/30/78 to provide one-time funding augmentation, as previously approved by Board (g) Tesseract Code and test the $21,462 6/27/78 Corporation Retirement Subsidiary 9/29j78 Ledger System programs (h) Bi. Bett, Inc. Alcohol program $25,888 Effective contract amendment increase 7-1-77 to increase the payment limit 10. authorize the Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee, to execute a standard forim Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreement with Garth and Milrita C. Blanchard (Ren-B-Way) , Martinez for the period of May 24, 1978 through June 30, 1979. 11. Authorize Chairman to execute contract with Eagle Signal Corporation for purchase of a Comouter Aided Dispatch System commencing June 27, 1978 as recorimended by the Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 00068 To; Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions- 6-27-78 Page: 4. , V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS '- continued 12. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee-, to conduct negotiations with various service providers for new or amended contracts for fiscal year 1978-1979. VI. LEGISLATION None. VII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 13. Establish June 26, 1978 as commencement date of the lease agreement between the County and Relocatable Confinement Facility Company for the confinement module placed at the Women's Minimum Security Facility in Richmond. VIII.OTHER ACTIONS 14. Authorize Chairman to execute agreement. of Sale entered into -among State of California, City of Richmond and the Co=ty for sale of parcels 560-140-003 and 560-140-005 to the City of Richmond pursuant to Revenue and. Taxation Code sections 3791 et seq. , as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. 15. Authorize reimbursement of $29..75 to -Deputy Sheriff Roger Dale Cluck for damage to personal property incurred in the , line of_ duty. 16. approve County Health Department's Immunization Initiative Plan for submission to the State Department of Health requesting $37,060 for continuation of the Child Immunization Project during the period July 1, 1978 through June 30, 1979, as recommended by Director, HumaW Resources Agency. 17. AuthorizeChairman, Board of Supervisors, to sign and submit to the U. S. Department of Labor CETA Title I Annual Plan Modification to increase the County's CETA Title I Grant from $3,641,351 to $4,068,247 for the period October-1, 1977 through September 30, 1978. 18. Approve the Final Alcoholism Program Budget for fiscal year 1977-1978, with no increase in previously authorized County funds for said program as recommended by the Director, Human Resources Agency. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: ti7EDNESDAY, 12 NOON CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Vernon L. Cline - Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Works Agenda for June 27, 1978 REPORTS Report A. SCHOOL CROSSING GUARD SERVICE At the instruction of your Board, the Public Works Director has sent a letter to school districts affected by school crossing guard service. The locations of the schools where crossing ' guards are now furnished and the school district in which they are located are shown in the table below. Name of School Location School District 1. Mountain View School Palm Ave. at Martinez Martinez Unified Avenue, Martinez School District 2. Las Juntas-Morello .,Pacheco Blvd. at Martinez Unified Elementary School Camino Del Sol, School District .Martinez 3. Gehri�-iger School State Highway 4 at Oakley Union Douglas Rd. , Oakley School District 4. Kensington School Arlington Blvd. at Richmond Unified Rincor_ Rd. , Kensington School District 5. Olinda School San Pablo Dam Rd. at Richmond Unified" Castro Ranch Road, School District. E1 Sobrante 6. Vista Grande School Diablo Rd. at Arroyo. San Ramon Valley Drive, Danville Unified School District 7. Vista- Grande School Camino Tassajara at San Ramon Valley Vista Grande St. , Unified School Danville District 8. Pacheco School Center Ave. at Deodar Mt. Diablo Unified Drive, Pacheco School District 9. St. Isidore School Danville Blvd. at St. Isidore's La Gonda Way, _ - Catholic School Danville (Continued on next page) AG E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 11 June 27, 1978 00010 Report A Continued: This Department has been informed that the Martinez. Unified School District will close the Mountain View School. Telephone inquiry of the other school districts reveals that no firm recommendations for alternate service will be forthcoming. The County Administrator recommended in his letter to your Board, dated June 20, 1978, that crossing guard services should be reduced from $48,100 to $23,088. The crossing guards were authorized after an extensive engineering study based on criteria adopted .by the Board. These criteria evaluate the` exi.stence and frequency of adequate gaps in a stream of traffic to enable students to cross the street in safety. All locations where crossing guard services are now provided meet the minimum criteria. For this reason, it is the opinion of the Public Works Director than priorities for school crossing guard services among the authorized locations cannot readily be determined and relative need cannot be established between "warranted" locations. It is therefore recommended that the Board either authorize crossing guard services at all of the eight remaining locations or alternately discontinue all crossing guard services. (MLK) SUPERVISOR11M DISTRICT I Item 1. FRANCISCAN WAY CLt =FRT - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Kensington P.rea The work performed under the contract for constructing a storm drain inlet,curb and gutter, installing corrugated steel pipe arch culvert, and placing an asphalt concrete overlay at the intersection of Fran- ciscan Way and Sunset Drive in the Kensington area was completed by the contractor, William A. Smith, of San Ramon, on May 5, 1978., in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard"' specifications at a contract cost of approximately $14,000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of May 5, 1978. - The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 1655-4435-665-78) (C) AiG E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 11 June 27, 1978 Item 2. ARLINGTON BLVD. AND MCBRYDE AVE. - APPROVE TRAFFIC P.EGULATION - -- � Richmond Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolutio:Ls Nos. 2450 and 2451 be approved as follows: Traffic Resolution No. 2450 ' Pursuant to Section 22358.3 of the California Vehicle Code, no vehicle shall travel in excess of 15 miles per hour on that portion of MCBRYDE AVENUE (Rd. 11065AT) , Richmond, beginning at the intersection of Arlington Boulevard and extending easterly to its point of termination, a distance of 0.68 miles. Traffic Resolution No. 2451 Pursuant to Section 21101 (b) of the California Vehicle. Code, the intersection of ARLINGTON BOULEVARD (Rd. Q1061B) and MCBRYDE AVENUE. (Rd. #1063AT) , Richmond, shall be declared a stop intersection and all vehicles traveling westerly on MCBRYDE AVENUE and northerly on ARLINGTON BOULEVARD shall stop before entering or crossing said intersection. (TO) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 3. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY SEWER CONNECTION Erni - Port .Costa 4ea. On May 2, 1978, the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5, adopted Ordinance No. 2 which prohibited additional connections to the Dis- trict's sewage system until June 30, 1978. On June 1, 1978, the District received a draft "Supplemental Project' Report, Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5", prepared by Harris & Associates, Consulting Engineers, of Lafayette. Upon receipt of the draft report by the District, copies were sent to the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board and the State Water Resources Control Board requesting review and comments on the report. To date no comments have been received . from. these regulatory agencies. The report recommends design and construction of a recirculating sand filter wastewater treatment process resulting in effluent meeting secondary requirements. Before the District can begin imple-menting this recommended project, state approval must be received. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department r`Page 3 of 11 June 27, 1978 00012 Item 3 Continued: 4 Due to the lack of state approval of the recommended plan to upgrade District No. 5's treatment facility, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of Sanitation Dis- trict No. 5, extend the emergency ordinance prohibiting f,.rther sewer service connections until July. 31, 1978. (RE: Work Order No. 5418-0927) (EC) Item 4. HILLTOP DRIVE - ACCEPT DEED - EI Sobrante Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Deed' and Right of Way Contract dated June 6., 1978 from the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop. of the Church of Jesus Christ of-Latter Day Saints, and authorize the Public Works Director to sign said contract on behalf of the County. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized to draw a warrant for $7,666, in favor of Western Title Insurance Company, Escrow AM310847-2, and deliver said warrant to the Public Works Real Property Division for processing. Payment is for 9,360 square feet of residential land- (RE: Project No. 0872-4415-663-77, Federal No. HHS-A768 (1) ) (RP) Item 5. WATERFRCVT :COAD APPPOVE AGREEMENT - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Second Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with DeLeuw, Cather and Company, Consultants, dated February 7, 1978, and authorize the Public Works Director to execute it on behalf of the County. This Amendment provides for increasing the maximum allowable reim- bursement to the soils sub-consultant (Moore & Taber of West Sacra- mento) from $2,500 to $6,500 for additional work as described. -in the Amendment. This Amendment also provides for increasing -the maximum allowable reimbursement to the consultant from $d2,500 to $66,500 for all ser- vices required. (NOTE- TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please return two fully executed agreer ments, with original signatures, to the Public Works Department for trnasmittal to DeLeuw, Cather and Company, with two copies of the Board Order) (RE: Project No. 3481-4215-925-75) (C) i A_, G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 11 June 27, 1978 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 6. SUBDIVISION MS 64-74 - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the improvements in Subdivision MS 64-74 have satis- factorily met the guaranteed performance standards for one year. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Clifford B. Davis the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement. Owner: Clifford B. Davis 1829 Mt. Diablo Blvd. Walnut .Creek, CA 94596 . Location: Subdivision MS 64-74 is located in the Walnut Creek area. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRIbT IV No Items SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item. 7. DANVILLE OFF-STREET PARKING DISTRICT - ACCEPT CONTRACT - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board, of Supervisors accept as complete, as of June 27, 1978, the construction contract with Kal-Co Landscaping -bf Morac_ for the i= =cape construction of, the Danville Off-Street. Paring Districts Danville, and direct its Clerk to file the appro- priate Notice of Completion. It is also recommended that the contract time be extended from April 30,. 1978 to June 27, 1978, inasmuch as the contractor was delayed due to weather and utility relocations. (RE: 8873-2282) (B&G) Item 8. BLACKSAWA ROAD OVERLAY - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the Agreeiment (Rescission of Contract) with Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , and authorize its Chairman to execute the Agree- ment on behalf of the County. 2. Authorize the Auditor Controller to issue a warrant, in the amount of $850, to Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , being the County's consideration for the Rescission Agreement. (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 5 of lI June '27, 1978 � 1111 qq Item 8 Continued: 3. Exonerate the Performance and Payment Bonds submitted to the County by Branaugh Excavating, Inc. The contract for the overlay of Blackhawk Road was awarded to Branaugh Excavating, Inc.., on September 26, 1977. The contract special pro- visions stipulated that a Notice to Proceed might be delayed up to 20 days in order to allow for the completion of the alphalt concrete " leveling course and frontage improvements by the developer for Subdi- vision 4878. The developer was unable to complete this work before winter. This work was completed in May of this year. Because of the unexpected and lengthy postponement of the start of the work and the escalation of costs im the past eight months, Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , has requested: 1. A re-negotiation of contract prices Which would increase the contract cost by $3,000, or 2. A rescission of the contract and reimbursement for bond and insur- ance costs. County Counsel has advised that- a re-negotiation of prices is improper since there has been no charge in the character of the work, and has advised the Public Works Department that a rescission of the contract . would be the. proper course to -follow in order to avoid court proceed- ings. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD:• Please return two fully executed Agree- ments, with original signatures, to the Public Works Department for transmittal to Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , with two copies of the Board Order) (RE: Project No. 4331-4405-661-77) (C) Item 9. SUBDIVISION MS 177-72 - WAIVE PARK DEDICATION FEF. - Alamo Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors determine that the $90 Park Dedication Fee for Subdivision KS '177-72 is not collectable and discharge the Public Works Department from accountability for its collection in accordance with Government Code 25257. Inadvertently, the fee was not collected prior to the recording of the parcel map. The map was recorded on April 4, 1973. . Developer: Mr. P. B. Madden Location: Subdivision MS 177-72 is located on the east side of El Pintado at the intersection of Spring Lane in the Alamo area. i V 001 j (LD) ASG E N'D A Public Works Department Page 6 of 11 June 27, 1978 Item 10. VARIOUS ROADS - GRA`NT PARTIAL ROAD CLOSURE - Oakley Area • The Holy Ghost Committee of Oakley requests permission to partially close O'Hara Avenue, dome Street, Second Street and Third Street to hold its annual "Holy Ghost Procession" parade on July 16, 1978 from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Traffic will be detoured over neighborhood streets. The Public Works Department recommends that the partial closure of the County roads be approved, subject to the conditions set forth relative to parades in Board Resolution No. 4714, including a re- quirement that the Holy Ghost Committee furnish a Certificate of Insurance ($500,000 Combined Single Limit Public Liability and Property Damage- or an amount agreed upon by the County Administrator) and that the County is named as additional insured. Concurrence has been received by the County Sheriff's Department, the Oakley Fire District and the Highway Patrol. It is further recommended that the Public Worcs Director be author- ized to request the State Department of- Transportation to grant a partial closure of. State Highway 4 for the parade. (LD) Item 11. VARIOUS ROADS - GP.a-yT ROAD CLOSURE - Danville Area The San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce requests permission to close Danville Highway from Las Barrancas to Boone Court including North Hartz Avenue, South Hartz and San Ramon Valley Boulevard to conduct its ann,7-1Fourth of Julv Celebration Parade on July 4, 1978 frcm 9:15 a..=. to 12:30 p.m. in addition, it is requested that Del Amigo Road be closed from Danville Boulevard to Las Barrancas from 9:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on the same day. Traffic will be detoured over existing neighborhood streets. -Letters have been received from the Sheriff's Department, the High- way Patrol and the Danville Fire Protection District, stating they , have no objection to the parade. The required insurance certificate has been received. It is recommended that the closure be approved subject to the conditions set forth relative to parades in Board Resolution No. 4714. (LD) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 7 of 11 June 27, 1978 ON-1 Item 12. SUBDIVISION MS 56-78 - WAIVE ORDINANCE REQUIPM1ENT - Byron Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors waive the requirement, of the Ordinance Code, -Title 9, for a consent to dedication for Sub- division MS 56-78. The owner has tried unsuccessfully to obtain the consent for a roadway . easement. The lack of consent will not adversely affect the rights of the County. Owner: Gwendolyn Richart Rt. 1 Box 88, Byron, CA 94514 Location: Subdivision MS 56-78 is located on the east side of Byron Highway south of Borden Highway. (RE: Assessors -Parcel No. 011-200-031) (LD) Item 13. EL DORADO DRIVE - ACCEPT ROAD - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Issue an order stating that the construction of improvements on El Dorado Drive in conjunction with a Road Improvement Agreement, datea February 22, 1977, has been satisfactorily completed. 2. Accept E1 Dorado Drive as a County Road as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 3843 filed May 23, 1973 in Book 157 of naps at page 31. Subdivider: Larwin Northern. Calif. , Inc. 6500 Village Parkway Dublin, CA 94566 Location: E1 Dorado Drive intersects El Suyo Drive 300+ feet south of Colima Avenue in the San Ramon area. ;{ f (LD) GENERAL. Item 14. RECOi1tiLNDATIONS ON AWARD OF CONTRACTS The Public Works Director will present recommendations on the award of contracts for which-he has received bids. (ADM) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 8 of 11 ��J ( June 27, 1978 �J i� Item 15. VARIOUS LAND DEVELOPMENT ACTIONS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the following: Item Development Owner Area Parcel Map MS 142-76 J. H. Bronson Orinda Parcel Map and Subdivi- MS 121-77 C.J. Roloff Lafayette sion Agreement Final Map and Subdivi- Sub. 5280 Ignacio Creek San Ramon - sion Agreement Development'Co. Final Map and Subdivi- Sub 4955 IRCAL Corporation Alamo, division Agreement Deferred Improvement LL'P 2001-75 Robert F. Mygrant Byron Agreement Parcel Map rZS 56-78 Gwendolyn Richart Byron Parcel Map MS 106-77 Vaquero Farms Brentwood Inc. Parcel Map MS 35-78 Raymond Porter Pacheco Parcel Map and Subdivi- MS 5-78 Pro-Land Develop Martinez sion ment Parcel- Map MS 239-77 Michael W. Clancy Brentwood (LD) Item 16. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the following instruments: No. Instrument Date _Grantor Reference 1. Consent to Dedication 6-5-78 Pacific Telephone & Sub MS 226-76 for Roadway. Purposes Telegraph Co. 2. Consent to Dedication 1-10-78 East Bay Municipal Sub 5165 for Roadway Purposes Utility District 3. Grant Deed 6-3-78 Robert F. rlygrant, LUP 2001-75 et al. (LD) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department i Page 9 of 11 June 27, 1978 Item 17. COMPLETION OF SUBDIVISION 11NIPROVEMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors issue an -order stat ing that the construction of improvements in following listed sub- divisions have been satisfactorily completed. It is further recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept as County Road those streets which are shown and dedicated for public use on the final maps for these subdivisions. Subdivision Developer Recording Data Area 4631 James M. Leaver April 13, 1977 San Ramon (195 M 20) 4819 Donald Lawrie July 28, 1976 San Ramon (188 M 1) 4656 W. W. Dean Feb. 23, 1977 San Ramon (193 •M20) (LD) Item 18. RICHMOND ADMINISTRATION BUILDING =- APPROVE FIRST AMENDMENT - Richmond Area It is rerc—T—A the Board of Supervisors approve and autho ries the Public works Director to execute the First Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with Hardison & Komatsu Associates for programming and master planning of the Court Facility Remodel, Administration Building, Richmond. The First Amendment is effective June 6, 1978 and provides for an increase in architectural fees due to enlarging the project scope as required to furnish complete information for planning and pro- gramming and provides for an amended payment limit of $9,500. This recommendation has been approved by the County Administrators' Office. (RE: 4403-41.88) (B&G) Item 19. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY - Weekly Report A. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider the attached "Calendar of Water Meetings. " (Continued on next page) A_ 'G E N D A - ® ('��Rx lic Works Department Page 10 of 11 J,.ne 27,. 1978. Item 19 continued: B. The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Supervisors ' information and public distribution. No action required C. Memorandum Report on Water Agency Activities No public hearings or meetings were held during the past.week. (EC) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A_ G E_ N D A_ Public Works Department Page 11 of 11 June 27, 1978 i n V V �V PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date: June 27, 1978 To: Board of Supervisors Vernon L. Cline , From: Public Works Director Subject: Extra Business for Tuesday, June 27, 1978 t : CONTRACT mir-NDMENT FOR A CONCEPTUAL ST11DY OF THE U_. S._STEEL RESOURCE RECOVERY PROJECT Item 1 A copy of the Phase I Report on the U. S. Steel Resource Recovery Project , which was prepared in compliance with a Consulting Services Agreement between the County and Brown and Caldwell, is submitted to the Board. Copies have been distributed to members of the Solid Waste Commission and the Advisory Panel for the U. S. Steel Resource Recovery- Project Study and-other interested entities. A The report recommends that the scope'o.f work for Phase II of the study be expanded to examine projects larger than originally envisioned. The Agreement contained a provision for an expansion of scope of work should the Phase I study suggest feasibility of a larger project, provided however that additional funds are avail- able. The State Solid Waste Management Board (SSIMB) agreed to amend- the existing 545,000 contract with the County to provide an additional $38,000 for completion of the expanded scope of work. This would enable examination of a range of larger scale projects. However, the SSIYMB has required the following conditions be placed in the Agreement before the $38,000 is granted for the study: 1. Each of the $10,000 amounts pledged from U. S. Steel and P.G. F E. , (, 20,000 total) are expended before any use is made of the $38,000 in this contract amendment; of3 �� =� � Public Works Dept. Page 1 of 3 EXTRA BUSIJune 27, 1978 Extra Business -2- June 26, 1978 2. The Contractor shall engage in a good-faith effort to acquire ~ the $38,000 amount from sources other than those outlined above. If unsuccessful, the Contr,,ctor shall certify in its interim report that it has- been unable to acquire such alternative funding; and 3. The Executive Officer of. the Solid {Vaste Management Board shall approve an interim report which shall be prepared following the expenditure of the original $45,000 and the $20,000 from the private firms. It is noted that the County has already received letters from U.S. Steel and P.G.&E. indicating intent of each firm to contribute $10,000 towards this project. It is recommended that: 0 The Board acknowledge. receipt .of the Phase I report, The Public Iorks Director be authorized to: a Execute the contract amendment with the State to accept the additional grant of thirty-eight thousand dollars ($38,000) from the State Solid iVaste Management Board; and • Execute a revised Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers, idalnut Creek, for expanded scope of work of the U.S. Steel Resource Recovery Project as an element of the County Solid Waste Management Plan. The Agreement to contain a proviso that work is to proceed commensurate with available funds but not to exceed one hundred and three thousand dollars. ($103,000) . EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Dept. Page 2 of 3 June 27, 1978 . C Extra Business -3- June 26, 1973 NOTE Z. The SS4,?fB has re(psested the Agre<:rment be executed innediate.Zy, before the W.,000 mnount Ls returned to the State's CeneraZ Fund. F 2. The County SoZid Waste Commission, recornnended at its June 2Z, f 2378 meeting that the Board authorize the Public Glorks Director to execute the contract amendment and to revise the ConsuZting Services Agreement with Brawn and CaZdweZZ, WaZnut Creek. ; (EC) t l t j� .s EXTRA BUSINESS 0002 Public Works Dept. Page 3 of 3 June 27 , 1978 t The Board of Supervisors met in all its capacities ' pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 2402.402 in regular session at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, June 27, 1978 in• Room 107, County Administration Building, Martinez, California. Present: Chairman R. I. Schroder, presiding Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine Clerk: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk r ;Ni. Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where the clerk was not furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time) . 0001111n In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 _Y8 In the Matter of Executive Session. At 11:37 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, .. California to discuss salary matters with- labor negotiators (pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) ; -At 11:58 a.m. the. Board reconvened in its Chambers and adopted the following;�Jrgency Resolution No. 78/635 and Urgency. Ordinance No. 78-47) 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor affixed this 27th day of .T,in P 19 78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By' Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Ne e nn �r H-24 4/77 15m OV.V : BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA As Governing Body of the County and of .All the other Public Entities of Which it is the Governing Body Re: Rescind Cost-of=Living Raises j . for County & District Personnel j` RESOLUTION NO. 78j 635 per Govt. Code 516280 (SB-154) . ) (June 27, 1978) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in all of its capacities as the governing body of this County and of the Districts and Public Agencies of which it is the governing body, RESOLVES THAT: 1. The State Legislature has enacted Chapter 292 of the Statutes of 1978 (SB-154, approved by the Governor. on or about June 24, 1978 as an emergency measure) to provide local agencies fiscal relief from the immediate effects of California Constitution, Article XIII A (Proposition 13, the "Jarvis-Gann Initiative" , approved by the voters on June 6, 1978) , and this resolution is to effectuate and comply with this statute. 2. Chapter 292 enacts GoverrLment Code Sec. 16280, which requires, as a condition of receiving the assistance provided by the Act, that local public agencies may not provide their employees cost-of-living salary increases exceeding those which may be provided state employees for the 1978-79 fiscal year. Section 16280 further declares that any contract betweena. local public agency and an employee organization which provides for a cost-of-living salary increase in excess of such increase pro- vided for state employees is null and void, and declares that such contracts are reopened and subject to new negotiation. 3. This Board is resolved to implement the provisions of Chapter 292 so that this County and Districts and Public Agencies governed by the Board may receive the assistance provided thereby, in order to avoid large scale employee layoffs and to continue to be able to pro—Ade essential public services. 4. This Board therefore declares that all cost-of-living salary increases for employees of Contra Costa County and of any . other District and Public Agency governed by this Board, beginning on or after July 1, 1978, granted in any memorandum of understanding, resolution or order of this Board (including but not limited to Resolution 77/602) , or otherwise, are hereby rescinded; but if any cost-of-living salary increase(s) in the 1978-79 fiscal year is/are provided for State employees, this Board will grant to personnel affected hereby such cost-of-living increases as Government Code §16280 permits Y not exceeding the inazxeases* grmarrted in the above ��srorandun and resolutions 5. This resolution is an emergency action: Article XIIIa. becomes fiscally effective on July 1, 1978. The revenues of the County and of all other agencies governed by this Board will be cut off .or drastically reduced beginning on July 1, 1978. Chapter 292 is effective as an urgency measure. Under these circumstances there is and has not been time to give notice, to meet with employee organizations or others, or to properly arrar_ge .the affairs of the County or the other agencies before taking this action. 6.. The Employee Relations Officer shall give -notice of this Resolution to all recognized employee organizations. 7. To the extent that the subjects of this Resolution are within the scope of representation under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Government Code §§3500 ff. ) , this Board offers to meet with any recognized employee organization upon request concerning this Resolution. 8. The Employee Relations Officer shall meet and confer with majority representatives upon request concerning this Resolution provided the subjects of such meeting and conferring are within the scope of representation. PASSED on June 2?, 1978. 4,1141 ell.Com, (Z.a.. 2,1,me.egzll ,: . VV�r RESOLUTION NO. 78/635 �---••rte,---;;� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Introduction and Adoption of Ordinance No. 78-47. Urgency Ordinance No. 78-47, effective immediately, amending Section 24-26.006 of the County Ordinance Code to continue on and after July 1, 1978 the $1418 monthly salaries for County Supervisors plus (1) reimbursement for reasonable e enses necessarily incurred in the conduct of such office, (2) such other benefits as are provided other elected county officers and management employees, such as the County Adminis- trAtor, and (3) a percentage cost-of-living raise, not exceeding the percenta a granted State employees during the 1978-197 fiscal year referred to in Government Code Sec. 16280 as amended on about June 24, 1978), as found and declared by Board resolution during that year fixing the percentage and the total salary not exceeding $1489 monthly, having been introduced this day and the Board by unanimous vote having waived reading of same; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid ordinance is ADOPTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish same in the ANTIOCH DAILY LEDGER for the time and in the manner required by law. PASSED by the Board on June 16, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of June . 19 78 Neu J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B ciDeputy Clerk ne ld H-24 4/77 15m .t r t ORDINANCE NO. 78-47 (Urgency) (Supervisors' Salaries) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code) : SECTION I. SECTION II of Ordinance No. 77-68 (8-2-77) is repealed. SECTION II. Section 24-26. 006 of the County Ordinance Code, as. amended by Ord. #77-68 's Secs. I and II (on 8-2-77, to be effective on 10-2-77, and to be operative on 10-2-77 and 7-1-78 respectively) is amended, to continue on and after July 1, 1978 the $1418 monthly salaries for County Supervisors (heretofore effective and operative 10-2-77 through 6-30-78 by Ord. #77-68 's Sec. I) , to read: 24-26. 006 Supervisors. Each Supervisor,: for service as such, shall receive a base monthly salary •of $1418, plus (1) reimbursement for reasonable expenses necessarily i.n� curred in the conduct of such office, (2) such other benefits as are provided other elected county officers and management employees, such as the county administrator, and (3) a per- centage cost-of-living raise, not exceeding the percentage granted state employees during the 1978-79 fiscal year (referred to in Government Code Sec. 16280 as amended on about June 24, 1978) , as found and declared by Board reso_ lution during that year fixing the percentage and the total salary not exceeding $1489 monthly. (Ords. 78-*-7 §2, 77-68 §§1&2, 76-59, 75-36, 74-49,- 70-68: prior code §2431.2: Const. XI l [b] , Gov. C. §25123.5.) SECTION III. URGENCY. This ordinance is for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety within the meaning of Government Code Section 25123 and Elections Code Section 3751, because the passage of Article XIIIa of the California Constitution by the voters on June 6, 1978 (Proposition 13, the "Jarvis-Gann Initiative") drasti- cally reduced the property tax revenue available to pay for County services necessary to preserve the public peace, health, and safety, and the only available method to continue many of these necessary services is acceptance of State funds made available through Chapter 292 of 1978 Statutes, approved by the Governor on about June 24, 1978, but this new statute enacts Government Code Sec. 16280, which con- ditions use of these State funds on local officials not getting cost-of-living salary increases exceeding those granted State employees, which are not now know! so that paying the 5% salary increase pro- vided by Ord. #77-68 's Sec. I beginning on 7-1-78 may disqualify this County from receiving State funds upon which those necessary County services depend. SECTION IV. SEVERABILITY. This Board declares that, if the urgency nature of this ordinance (SECTIONS III & V) is invalidated, it intends SECTION I 's repeal of Ord. 77-68 's SECTION II to•remain valid and effective and that it would have passed SECTION I even without the urgency provisions. Therefore, the Board directs that this cne ordinance be treated and published, effective and operative, as though it is both an urgency and a non-urgency ordinar_ce as provided in SECTION V. ORDINANCE NO. 78-47 00029 SECTION V. EFFECTIVE and OPERATIVE DATES. As an urgency ordinance, this ordinance becomes effective and operative immediately on passage. If a court holds it to be a non-urgency ordinance, it becomes effective (pursuant to Government Code Sec. 25123. 5) beginning on August 26, 1978 but (for accounting convenience) shall be operative beginning on September 1, 1978. Within 15 days of passage it shall be published once with the names of the supervisors voting for and against it in the Antioch Daily Ledger a newspaper published in this County. PASSED ON June27, 1978, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors - J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N.,. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine, and' R. I. Schroder.. ' NOES: Supervisors - None. Absent: Supervisor - None. ATTEST: J.R_Olsson, County Clerk ' & ex officio Clerk of the Board R. I. Schroder .airman of the Board By -A n f, Dep. Maxine M. a eld GWM:bc (6-26-78) , (6-27-78) ORDINANCE No. 78- 47 Vll�VO . .ORDINANCE NO. 78-42 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 382 ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A PRECISE LAND USE MASTER PLAN OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING LAND USE DISTRICTS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, AND DIVIDING AND DISTRICTING SAID COUNTY INTO LAND USE DISTRICTS, PROVIDING REGULATIONS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT THEREOF, AND PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE", PROVIDING FOR THE REZONING OF A PORTION OF THE ALAMO AREA. BEING IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Repeal Ordinance 78-39. Ordinance No. 78-39 (6/6/78) enacted this rezoning provision, but with the erroneous reference to "R-20" district instead of the correct 11R-40" district; and this present ordinance repeals. Ordinance 78-39 and enacts the provision with the correct 11R-40" reference. SECTION TI. The Zoning Ordinance of the County of Contra Costa •is hereby amended by the addition of the hereinafter described zoning maps. These maps are added for the purpose of rezoning a portion of the territory shown thereon. The- said maps include a portion of the territory shown on the map entitled a portion. of Mt. Diablo Division, Sector 4 and the Districts Map for the Diablo Area Insert Map No. 22, Contra Costa County, California. SECTION III. Section 3A of Ordinance No. 382, of the County of Contra Costa is hereby amended by the addition of Subsection 1599 at the end thereof, as follows: An Amendment to a.portion of Mt. Diablo Division, Sector 4 and the Districts Map for the Diablo Area, Insert Map No. 22, Contra Costa County, California- 78-42: Daniel Ostrander, Applicant, 2171-RZ, Land located in the Alamo Area to Single Family Residential District (R-40) zoning classification. SECTION IV. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after date of adoption, and the same shall be published once before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, with the names of the members voting for and against the same, in THE VALLEY PIONEER , a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the County of Contra . _. Costa. Ir A ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, on the 27th day of June, 1978 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors - J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine, R. -I._ Schroder. NOES: Supervisors - None. ABSENT: Supervisors - None. • Robert I. Schroder Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of The County of Contra Costa. State of California ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of � Contra?obbie a, Stat of California By Cwerrez (SEAL) Dep Clerk 2171-RZ Daniel Ostrander, Applicant i - i f q -2 P-1 m+z R-100 A-2 2100-RZ �'! n ' R-15 i � � 'R-20 /p R-10 I I I . R-10 :R-2620A / �� •stl..�A yurE ° JR-101- I � /• / / /,/ o / �1lMt - U.O.sat A PORTION OF MT. DIABLO DIVISION SECTOR 4-and REFEM ED TO TIM 0001k NCE kG.57iHE MAP 42 AND THE DISTRICTS MAP FOR THE DIABLO AREA - 6 HEREBY MADE A PART THEREO'. INSERT MAP NO. 22 J.R.OLSSON. COUNTY CLERK B7 6 ^— CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SCALE IN recr DEPUTY CLERK BEING SECTION 3A,SUBSECTION BB9.CF ORDINANCE NO.382,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 78-42WHICH IS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY.STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 21N-RZ of"�'• 1 L V/ POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department HRA-14anpower Budget Unit 583 Date 6-20-78 Action Requested: Reallocate Manpower Analyst-Project position 01-15 to Administrative Analyst-Project Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: to reflect classification of duties performed and permit future promotion to ASA II-Project as appropriate to in�gpbents' duties and eligibility G° Estimated cost of adjustment: a Goss 9 Amount: �` 1 . Salaries and wages: co ���. O 1p100$ 2. Fixed Assets: (X L6t items and eort) $ P Estimated total AM �, � $ 0 o .� fJ Vr- G L' Signature iBI = C"D Department Hea Initial Zeteri4in ion of County Administrator ate: J ,nP 20 , 1 9 7 R i I o✓ Request reconendation. / Count Adrni.a'strator Personn4Loff a and/or Civil Service Commission D te: June 21, 1978 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate persons and positions of Manpower Analyst Project positions #01 through #15 to Administrative Analyst-Project. Study discloses duties and resPcnsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to the class o.= Administrative Analyst Project. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the realloca- tion of the persons and positions of Manpower Analyst-Project, positions #01 to #15, to Administrative Analyst-Project, both at Salary Level 352 (1078-1310) . 1 Assistant Personnel , irector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: June 22, 1978 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective June 28, 1978. E County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( _ ) on ,IUN�2 7 1978 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: J!IN 2 7 1.978 By: Robbie rrez APPROVAL c6 tJziz adjustment corstautes an Apptop&iation Adjustment and Pelu60nne2 Res otu ii.on Amendment. 1 NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form must be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 00tw3 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: D O Civil Service Department Department Public Service Dipl:.:rment Budget Unit 5J? Date Tune 21, 1973 Action Requested: Cancel Typist Clerk Trainee-C3TA position; ADD Ciertc-CST position Proposed effective date: 5/28/78 Explain why adjustment is needed: C:MA Public Service PloynAnt adjustments necessary to implement 71 77-78 program plan. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (fit stems and coat) Estimated to $ Signature p tment Head Initial Determination of County Administrator e: Ju a 22 1973 To Civil Service : for review and recommendatija:t::� Count Ad 0rittrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission D e: June 21, 1978 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cost Center 582 - Classify and Add (1) Clerk-C=1 position; and cancel (1) Typist Clerk Trainee-C 1A position No. 01. (Auditor-Controller). Daties and re5."...'._i.�4- -_lil.:i.es to be assigned justiry' cl-assification and adjustment. Can be effective day folloering Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of (1) Clerk-CE,TA position, Salary level 178 ($634-771), and the cancellation of (1) Typist Clerk Trainee-position 01, Sala_;, level 178 71). Personne irect Recommendation of County Administrator Date: J e 22, 1978 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or•,Civil Service Commission approved effective June 28, 1978. County Ads ' 1 to Action of the Board of Supervisors JUN 7 7 1978 Adjustment APPROVED ( on J. R. OLSSON, C Clerk 1978 B Date: IUN 2 7 Y= Robbie Gut", z APPROVAL o6 thiz adju4t,nent corvstitutes an Appnooruati.on Adjustment and PeersonneZ Redotuti.on Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form multi be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by anorganization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) 09034 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Civ-ill 'Service Br pax-Lament Departmen6ublic Service TMtployment Budget Unit 581 Date June 21, 1978 Action Requested: Cancel Youth Project fide-CTETA position (20/40) and Troist Cler?: Trainee- CETA (20/40); add Youth Project Nide-C-STA vosition Proposed effective date: 6/29/78 Explain why adjustment is needed: =IA Public Service ployment adjustments necessary to implement FY 77-75 program pian. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: $ 2. Fixed Assets: (t cat item6 and coat) Estimatedal $ Signature epartmen He Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: June 22, 1978 To Civil Service for review and recommen on. / Count mialstrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission te: June. 21, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Ll Cost Center 531 — Classify and add (1) Youth Project Aide—CMA position; and Cancel (1) Typist Clerk—C_—TA (20/40) position Nc. 50^ and (1) Youth Project slide—CETA (20/40) position No. 03. - (Cooperative :tensi: _ Laties and responsibilities to be assigned justify classification and adjustment. Can be effective day folloAng Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the addition of (1) Youth'Project Aide—CFTn position, Salary level 203 ($69. 4-532), and the cancellation of (1) Typist Clerk Trainee—C=FA (20/40) position :''� ', S i vel 178 ($634-771) and (1) Youth Project Aide—CE'A (20/40) position :'J3, Salmi evel ($a — 5j2).J I J4A"A ' Personnel ire r Recommendation of County Administrator Date: I June 22, 1978 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved effective June 28, 1978. County Admfnfstrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on JUN 2 7 1978 J. R. OLSSON, C y Clerk Date: JUN 2 7 1978 By: r Ro bis Guti APPROVAL oS th Ez adpj,5t rejIt Coned tLLteb an App-top Lia-ti.on Adjurtment and Pvtzonnee Rea otu tion Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mutt be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) -17 OSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: L .3-5 Department Sheriff-Coroner Budget Unit 0256 Date 3/30/78 Action Requested: classify one Sr. Sheriff's Dispatcher 256-6:{TA-006 Rosition Proposed effective da :: 4-01-78 Explain why adjustment is needed: Pauline Steffensen is on leave of absence due to illness and has applied for disability retirement. This pusition to be canceled upon* her return or retiremep�, T i%tend to fill Dispatcher vacancy when promotion is made. Estimated`cos� adjustment: Amount: 1 . Sci ri&aJwages: t p;tiJ Chu 2. KZ'Red kssef�W: (ti.6t items and cont) ED tr► ;fes,:, .f $ Estimated total_ �r $ Signature Department Head �. Initial Determination of County AdministratoraltrA60, To Civil Service: Request recommendaR111 all. i rstir/!. Co,Ont Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: I L June 13 1978 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify (1) Senior Sheriff's Dispatcher. This position is being established to accomodate replacement for Senior Sheriff's Dispatcher on Leave of Absence_ C= be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/.17 by adding (1) Senior Sheriff's Dispatcher, Salary Level 349 (1068-1298) . This position is to be cancelled upon return or separation of employee in position #03. Assistant - PersonneYDirector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: June 22, 1978 Recommendation of Personnel office and/or Civil. Service Commission approved effective June 28, 1978. r County A inis a or Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on -iIIN 2 7 1978 SUS! 2 7 1978 1 R. OLSSO o ntr erk - Date: By: Robbie Gutier. I APPROVAL o6 thi..5 adjustment constitutes an Appnop&iati•on Adju bnent and Peuonnee Reaotaton Amendment- NOPE: Top section and reverse side of form mu3.t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) '00M y,M /Z POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: loloff 5587 Department HRA-Manpower Prgject Budget Unit _531 Date 6-13-78 Action Requested: Add one Account Clerk I-Project position Proposed effective date: ASAP Explain why adjustment is needed: to assist Auditor--Controller in payment of CETA Title I subcontractors via trust fund procedure Estimated cost of adjustment: 4:'1�`�` 2:y Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages:b @$766, 6 @$804 + Frknge OAT ' %4�� $ 11 ,000. 2. Fixed Assets: (t i.6t .c tem4 and coat) 'ce L $ Ln E::timated total ,. 11,000 'r W co z Signature lig-; " `„. �.'1, 1';sr-✓ `4 Department-Head Ini li al rUeter*nati on of County Administrator Date: June 15 1978 To•Civaal Service for review and recommend A. Counjiy A' fii m ator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Dae: June 21- 1978 Classification and Pay Recommendation Classify 1 Account Clerk I-Project. Study discloses duties and resperosibilities to be assigned justify classification as Account Clerk Project. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by adding 1 Account Clerk I-Project, Salary Level 240 (766-931) . Assistant Personnel 31rector Recommendation of County Administrator ate: June 22, 1978 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or--Civi:l Service Commission approved effective June 28, 1978. County A istrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ) on JUN_2 7 1978 J. R. OLSSOIV ty Clerk Date: JUN 2 7 1978 By; Robbie Gu ie ez APPROVAL of tLiz adju4tment eon4tctute4 an Appiopx a Zon Adjust-ment and Peuonnee Rezotu Zon Amendment. NOTE: Top section and reverse side of form mu4t be completed and supplemented, when appropriate, by an organization chart depicting the section or office affected. P 300 (M347) (Rev. 11/70) SON MA COSTA BOUNTY { APPROPRIATION 'fiDJUSTMENT � T/C Z T ,f ACCODNT CIIINC 1. DEPARTMENT 11 HCANIZATIIM OUT: PROBATION - #3060 ORGANIZATION 311-011JECT !. FIXED ASSET -QECIEASI> INCREASE INJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM It. noTITY, 3060 4951 Typist Desk 004 I $240.00 3060 4951 Desk 60x30 003 1 $240.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER To transfer funds within Fixed Asset Accounts for the on purchase of desks - P.O. #09901 and P.O. #10691 per By.. Date /7Auditor Controller Budget Division COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: JAI 1978 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SuPmvisors Kenny.Nanden YES: Schroder.Boggess,Hassehine ( Q N0: None 00V1v OJUN 2 7 197 J.R. OLSSON, CLER County Probation Ofcr" 9V 8 SIAAATY t•. - TITLE ." SATO- By. _ A►nlnuTlll APO 5 y22 Robbie Gut•,r r ADJ. AMYL N1. IM 129 NOV.7X77): IIEt INGTRUCTION3 ON RtVERiE 3109 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT / T/C 27 , f ACCOUNT COOING 1. OEPARTNENT OS OWARRIITI0111:1ilIT: Probation Department #3120 Juvenile Hall ORGANIZATION 501-UJECT L 1,181 JU 4 13 r � FINE1 ASSET gECREASI;'� INCREASE OIJECT OF EXPENSE OR 71< ASSET ITEM No. IUANTITY - — 4 CCNTROLLEV F 3120 4956 Portable Transmitter efgser 0025 1 270 3120 2270 Repair & Service Equipment 270 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER - ((�� To adjust within Juvenile Hall budget accounts for the pur BY ( c`de,.�,��d/ Dot9 5 /31/ chase of a testing device for the security sound sensor equipment. COUNT ADM ISTRATOR The sound alarm and intercom system is being modified by ,IDN• 9 P. Wn installing alarm lamps, settings -on sensitivity controls By: Dors and external speaker and switch at this time, which will cost about $975.00. In addition, -the portable tester is BOARD OF SUPERVISORS r,.,quired to insure proper functioning of this equipment and Supe.-Visors Kenny,Fanden this item will cost $250.00 plus tax. YES: Schroder.Boggess.Hus`ldne N0: Nine 00039 SUN 2 7/197 J.R. OLSSON, CLERK 4. st. County P.O. / tl• Ol1E• T1TL[ DAT[ 8y: `- APPROPRIATION Q P00 4' fl R bbie Outi ire ADJ. JOURNAL 10. (N 129 Rev. 7/77) REE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE 3109 APPROPRIAT10N ADJUSTMENT O� TIC 2 7 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODINC Auditor-Data Processing ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET gECREASF> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. OUANT Y 1095 2250 Rent of Equipment 2,.500 ln95 2270 Repair & Service of Equipment 7,800 1095 2315 Data Processing Services 50,000 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingencies - Gen.Fund 60,300 0994 6304 Reserve for Contingencies - Rev.Shar 60,300 1100 2310 Business/Personalty System 25,00n 1123 2310 Library Feasibility Study 10,000 1124 231n Consolidated Fire Inspect. 7,000 1125 2310 Assessor Time Study 300 1127 2310 C. S. Module 5 18,000 1140 2250 Equipment 2,500 1140 2270 Repair & Serv. of Equipment 7 ,800 1140 2310 Professional Services 50,000 1140 5022 Cost Applied 60,3n0 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Transfer of funds to Cover the County' s portion �Zo� of the development costs of the County's Law By. Dot• and Justice System. COUNTY DMINISTRATOR By. Ada BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny.1-andw YES: Schroder.Boggess.Hasscirine Of(/�l�A(�j o�/�/ 0\/V iw/ NO: None , O, UN 2 19 8 Adm.Svcs.Asst. 6 X6178 J.R. OLSS N, CLE 4• SIGNATURE TITLE GATE _ By: A 200 APPROPRIATION Robbie'-G e ARS. JONRNAL 10. vM4zo IFor.?flT) TEE INTTRYCTIONi ON REVERT[ $109 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ` APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C_ a T l�` ACCOUNT C0/116 1. DEPARTMENT OR OACANIIA110N OMIT: PROBATION OAUNIIATI11 SOM-OBJECT L FIXED ASSET -OECREASI> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE 01 FIXED ASSET ITEN 10. OOANTITT — " 4405 4203 Basement Remodel - Richmond 1,820 3800 3580 Grants in Aid 2,120 0390 6301 Reserve for Contingencies - General Reserve 3,940' 3205 3310 Board and'Care 3,940 0994 6301 Reserve for Contingencies - Revenue Sharing Reserve 3,940 Co:' i'•::r Co. ra Couniy cCE VED IM! 1 = 1978 OIt1c of Ccu ily Ad ninistratior APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTRO LER To transfer funds from Probation Court Ordered Programs #3205 to Basement Remodeling Project as requested by By: Date &/ /7 Public Works ($1,820), and to establish $2,120 cash match in Grants in Aid object for the 1978 Juvenile COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Justice Planning Grant. The $2,120 is a required hard match which will enable the Criminal Justice Agency By: � Doti ' �R of Contra Costa County to secure the necessary Federal Grant Funding for this project of $19,083. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny,Fanden YES: Schroder.Bo ggess•Hasselcine N0: Wine 00041 �U 2 19 8 J.R. OLSSON CLERK;_____-------., 4_ �� ��� Co. Probation Ofcr. 6/13/ � � �I�MATYJfE• TirLE /' By: APPROPRIATION A P40 7 7bb obbie Gut• AOS. JOURNAL 110. (M 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INITRNCT10N9 09 R[VER3[ $101 • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - APP OPRIATIUN ADJUSTN,EtIT 1 T/C 2 T I C;ix;:4:NT GC C=rA$IIAM-h UNIT 0583 Ar::':�tT iCDI!�e v Mnnnnwer Offir-i-_ FItE: Ass T <,EC:EASE> INCREASE MELT £F EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITER tQ. QUANTITY nj-- 5594 4951 Electric Date Stamp 0003 1 e5s.ee ,250.00 ` 5594 4951 5-Drawer (w/lock) lateral File • Milt 2 Cabinets ( +99.92/each) 559+ 2131 Minor Equipment $ 550-00 5594 2310 Professional & Personal Services 4 �.-�• APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST UDITQR-CONTROL S E:R a) File Cabinets & Date Stamp to accommodate adaitiona? E3;• Date contracts and correspondence generated by this offices assumation of Titles II & V-I (PSE) of the COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CETA Program. JUN 2. 1Q7P 8>: ooze b) To adjust various funds to reflect -current needs. BOARS) OF SUPERVISORS c) 100% federal funds involved in this adjustment!- Supermors Kenny.Fanden YES_ Schroder.Boggess.Hnseltine NO: None 0.0042 o uw 2,W 19 s l J R. ULS50cs. CLER4. — r SD /l .1CNATUNEn tt rLE f. ACM:Imd AP?"noPttu ics A POO X756 Robbie Gtstie .DJ JDURM he. tH I2P :eJ -i/7T) SFE INSTRUCTIONS Qa REVLRSE SICE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 I N 1. DEPARTMENT.OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT 'CODING j; =78 0583 COUNTY MANPOWER OFFICE_ 67 . II ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM D,TUR CuNIRC OWITIF; 5594 1011 Permanent-Salaries $2;000 5594 2281- Maintenance of Buildings & Improvements $2,000 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION `OF-REQUEST' - AUDITOR-CONTROL LE R F"REQUESTAUDITOR-CONTROLLER TO provide funds for alterations made by the Public Works Department necessary for the relocation of c Date 6'/-0/ .. By. T1l the County .Manppower:Office. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR JUN 2 2 RM By: Data BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenley.Faltden YES: Schroder.Boggess.Hasseltine 00043 NO: dune O, *2/7 19 8 J.R. OLSSON, GFiscal Officer 6/16/78 SIBMATWIE TITLE DATE --- By: R. d incenzi APPROPRUTIoN A POO� Robbie .Gvfe. ADJ. JOURNAL 10. (M 129 Rev.7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE ~ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION. ADJUSTMENT T/C`27 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: HEALTH ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. GUANTITT 0450 4954 Interscan 1176. Portable Hydrogen Sulfide Analyzer 0028 150 0450 4954 Interscan Model RG-288-DC strip 00.29 150 chart recorder APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER To provide funds for the purchase of By Dated Environmental: Health capital. equipment. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR WN 2 2 19 By: Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , YES- Supervisors Kennv,Fanden Schroder,Boggess,Hasseltine � NO: None OJUN/2 7 19 8 J.R. OLSSON, CLER 4. Y, at",U / / " exs��ADJ.R DATE By. JOUTATi Np.A POOO b� 'Robbie i.. (M 129 Rev. 7177) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA CDSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING Contra Costa County Fire Protection ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <6ECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. QUANTITY 7100 4782 Fuel Tanks _ Sta 6-14 2,750.00 7100 4956 For Fuel Tanks 0037 805.00 7100 4956 For Fuel Tanks 0029 , 1,297.00 7100 4956 For Fuel Tanks 0036 648.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER ey: Date G Increase of construction and County Administration charges through Public Works. COUNTY DMINISTRATOR By: DAJN A 2 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny.Fandm YES: Schroder,Boggess,Hasseltine NO: None o o W 0 UN/2 19'r 8 J.R. OLS ON, CLERK 4. Chief 6/22/78 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE By: APPROPRIATION Robbie ADJ. JOURNAL 00. (N 129 Rrv. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Di� SN� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING ContmCOSta County Fire Protection District ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. IQUANTITY 7100 4798 Fire Coll Improvements 1,611.00 , 7100 4956 per FiA a-il 0030 1,611.00 FRor4r 1�t16i�"ER �gcZC ZOLAROVED3. EXPLANATION OFREQUEST AUDITOL 6 v/ By: Dote / / Additional funds needed by Public Works for Fire / College Site Improvements. COUNTY AOMI ISTRATOR By: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervsors Kenny.hathaen YES: Sch7odcr.Bogg=.Hasseldw NO: None 0 UN/2198 4. 6Y �Chief 2 78 J.R. OLSS N, CLE�R�K .. SIGNATURE TITLE �K7 DATE By: APPROPRIATION A POO ADJ. JOURNAL 10. Robbie GaXlarlez (M 129 Rav_ 7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA,COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 0 T/C 27 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING Contra Costa County Fire Protection District ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <,bECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. QUANTITY 7100 4955 Computer Aided Dis Sys 0027 151,500.00 J-4-7 3? 7100 445.7 9pp C.A.D. System F'� , .�; 16,500.00 7100 -*953 For C.A.D. System f ,,at 1 ��5 ,�?"� � 0017 135,000.00 APPROVED-- 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITPl�2''� T ER ,7 _(� Funds necessary to complete the Computer Aided By, Date Dispatch System. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR t' By: rJuDat.2 2v 19M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny,Fanden YES: Schroder.Boggess,Hassddw NO: None oJU 2� 1978 J.R. OLSSON, CLER 4. Chief 6/9 /7$ 81-01ATURE TITLE DATE By: �— APPROPRIATION A POO / ADJ. JOURNAL 10. Robbie =rrez (M 129 Rev. 7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE O� . CANTRA-COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 I. DEPARTMENT Or ORGANIZATION UNIT: kCCOUNT CODING County Administrator (Bldgs, & Grounds) ORGANIZATION SUB-09JECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 90. OUARTITY 4411 4722 1. Landscape domen's Min Sec $ $ 32500. 4411 4769 1. RCF Women's Min sec 3,500. 4405 4196 2. Handicapped Improvements-Mtz 5,750. _ 4405 4718 2. Handicapped Curbs 51750 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER ,� 1. To transfer additional funds into site development for Women By c Date /78 's Minimum Security Facility to cover construction contract change order. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 2• jUN To consolidate funds for handicap improvement By: Date 2� project. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -,upervrsors Kenny,Fanden YES: Schroder,Boggess,Handrine NO: None 00048 oJUN/2 7 19M Asst. Co. Admin— J.R. OLSSON, CLER 4. istrator—Finance 6/2 ,�_ S10NATURE TITLE �,�+ DATE By: APPROPRIATION A P0057y5 R bbie Guti r ADJ. JOURNAL M0. (Al 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 T ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR OACANIIATIOM UNIT: COUNTY CLERK 0240 ONCANIZATION SUI-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <bECREASE> INCREASE OIJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10, OUANTITT —" 0240 2100 Office Expense $16,000 0240 2310 Professional and Personal Services $16 ,000 _ ContW Costa Coun R CEIVED AN 19 1978 - Office of Coun y Administrai or APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST. . AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Increased costs and revised forms have increased 77$ office supply needs.- offset -by ;decreasing key Date-6l&/ punch index requirements from-;Elections . COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ORIGINAL SIGNED BY "JUN 2 2 )9 By: F. FERNANDEZ Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supe--ors Kenny,Fandcn YE S: Schroder,Boggs,Huxlrine Q NO: None 00049 2 19 8 J.R. OLSSON, CL4. COUNTY CLERK 6 8 78 SIONATYRE TITLE �/ DATE By: APPROPRIATION A POO 67'10 Robbie Gut* ADJ. JOAN/AL 10. IN 129 Raw- 7/7T) 'SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERE SIDE • CONTRACOSTA COUNTY • APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: D.A. FAMILY SUPPORT (CC #0245) ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <IECREASE' INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE ON FIXED ASSET ITER 10. QUANTITY 0245 1011 Permanent Salaries 8,500 1013 Temporary Salaries 2,320 1014 Permanent Overtime 2,700` 1019 Comp Insurance Recoveries 3,360 2100 Office Expense 13,400 2110 Communications 1,300 2170 Household Expense 3,450 2250 Rental of Equipment 500 2261 Occupancy Costs Rented Building 7,500 2281 Maintenance, Buildings & Improvements 1,000 2301 Auto Mileage Employees 6,800 2302 Use of County Equipment 4,300 2305 Freight Drayage Express 1,150 2310 Professional and Personal Services 7,700 3550 Negotiated Damages . 1,680 4951 Office Equipment and Furniture 899 Al-le Tv6 eat 000/ / lbo Tab/e 0k,,Aeie fee / 41100 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONT R L.ER This adjustment is necessary to .shift funds from /��g accounts with a projected surplus to accounts with a By: Dote projected deficit. Office Expense has risen above original budget estimates because of an unexpected COUNTY ADM ISTRATOR increase in the volume of outgoing mail and associated Jtr N 2R postage costs. By: a BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: Supe"Mrs Kenny.Fanden n n Schroder.Boggess.Hassekine NO: None - onjuo 2/7 M8 Jam. OLSSON, CLE 4. Chief Asstt. D.A. 6 x9 78 SIC RE TITLE DATE' Gary Strankman L/�+ By. 1 APPROPRIATION A P00 7 b3 Robbie Gut e .AOJ, JOURNAL NO. (Id 129 Rev. 7/TT) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA CO3TA COQNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING D.A. FAMILY SUPPORT LEGAL (CC# 0247) ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSEI -,IECREASE + INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. QUANTITY 2897 1013 Temporary Salaries 5,000 2897 1014 Overtime 250 2897 2100 Office ExPense600 2895 2160 Clothing .and .Personal Supplies `200 2897 2170 Household Expense 1;600 2891 22ftrr.5o Rental of Equipment 150 2895 2301 Auto Mileage Exmployees 1,900 2895 2302 Use of county Equipment 5,000 2897 2303 Other Travel Employees 550 2897 2310 Professional and Personal Services 1,400 2897 2313 Outside Attorney Fees - 150 2897 2473 Specialized Printing 300 2895 2490 Miscellaneous Services and Supplies 500 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER This adjustment is; necessary- to shift funds- from accounts, with a projected surplus to accounts. with a projected 8y Y YI Date�E. deficit. 0 COUNTY—AD NISTRATOR r - 9VN 2 2/19�R By; Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny,Fandcn YES: Schroder,Boggess,Hasselri:te N0. N:�rte N' 7 197 vtllf J.R. OLSSON, CLERK.--"`" 4. / YVJ Chief Asst. D.A. 6 �9 /78 StiI#ATUR F TITLtt DATE Ga . E. Strankman By: APPROPRIATION A PO0S_-'/ ,5 obbie <u lit ez ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (AI 129 Rev.7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE,. . ! CONTRA COSTA*COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: DISTRICT ATTORNEY (CC# 0242) ORGANIZATION SUS-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET -DECREASE} INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 2835 1011 Permanent Salaries 2,000 2805 1013 Temporary Salaries 2,000 2800 2131 Minor Equipment 310 2800 2170 Household Expense 1,300 2835 2261 Occupancy Costs Rented Building 6,500 2805 2270 Repair and Service of Equipment 100 2805 2276 Maintenance Radio-Electronic Equipment 510 2835 2301 Auto Mileage Employees 1,800 2800 2302 Use of County Equipment 4,000 2800 2303 Other Travel Employees 3,000 2805 2310 Professional and Personal Services 2,000 2805 2350 Witness Fees & Expenses 6,500 2800 2472 Criminal Investigation 2,500 2800 21477 Education Supplies and Courses 900 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR- ONTn ER This adjustment is necessary: to shift funds from accounts with a projected surplus_ to accounts with a projected 9y: Date 6/00/7 ' deficit. Use of permanent salaries to offset temporary salaries costs was previously agreed to by the County COUNTY ADMINISTRATORY1� Administrator's Office in response to my memo of December JUN t�i28, 1977 wherein I outlined that a temporary clerk was 8y. Date 1 / to be used as a pregnancy leave of absence back-up for several permanent clerks. In addition, two clerical BOARD OF SUPERVISORS positions were frozen in anticipation of the passage of Supm*oz Kenny,Fandm Proposition #13 and temporary help was used to,cover �s YES. B ,Handine these jobs. This again was approved informally by the County Administrator's Office. N0: None 8 _ 52 G�U� 2�? 19 000 J.R. DLSSON* CLE 4. � _---ChiefA, G't. D.A. �, g ha SIGNATURE TITLE � DATE Gar E. Strankman APPROPRIATION A POd "y VI By: ADJ. JOURNAL 10. obbie Gu� T11ej (M 124 Rov.7/77? SEi INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE U11.1.1AM A. WMALIXY OFFICE OF MICHAEL 1. PHEL W nosttict Aucro--r D I S T R I C T ATTORNEY Chic(Asslaant CONTRA COSTA COUNTY To: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator Date: December 28, 1977 Attention Marilyn Burke, Management Analyst III From: William A. O'Malley, District Attorney By: John N. Christolos, Administrati i es ssistant III subject: Increase in Temporary Salaries, Co Center 242 During the next six months, the Martinez Office will have one Account Clerk I employee on pregnancy leave of absence for a period of three months and one Intermediate Typist Clerk employee on pregnancy leave of absence for a period of six months while the Concord Office will have one Legal Services Clerk employee on pregnancy leave of absence for a period of three months (of this fiscal year) . Neither of these offices have been authorized permanent intermittent clerical positions to provide coverage during extended periods of absences. In the past, we have relied on temporary help on an as-required basis which has not p-zJen too effective inasmuch as it takes a considerable period of time " for the average person to learn the various policies, procedures and operations of the District Attorney's Office before the individual can become reasonably productive. Approximately two months ago we hired a temporary Typist Clerk for the AB3121 Project, whose funding for clerical help is now exhausted. This person has had previous experience in the court system and she has proven to be an outstanding employee in every respect. tie desire to retain her services to provide coverage for the above described absences. We sincerely believe that because of her demonstrated initiative, competence and ability to learn quickly that she can be effectively utilized in a variety of assignments. Our temporary salaries account in Cost Center 242 is not 'rte+ sufficient to retain the services of this Typist Clerk during f y the next six months on a full-time basis. We therefore request that we be authorized to use part of the salary and fringe 6- ; -' ' ,/benefits savings that will accrue�by the_absencesof the above described em to ees to ad'ust our tem orar�ysa ries A-ccoun ; 1013 in Cost Center 242 so that we can retain this`temporary lJ1' � Typist Clerk. It is estimated that we will need an additional $3,500 in temporary salaries for this purpose. It is additionally estimated that $7,290 will accrue in salary savings while $1,530 will accrue in fringe benefits savings though $212 will be needed � f to cover FICA costs for the temporary position. i t� JNC:pr " 00053 S�/$Z CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: Auditor-Office Services ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <IECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO. QUANTITY 0149 1011 Permanent Salaries 25,000 2100 Office Expense 10,000 2102 Books-Periodical Subscriptions 300 2110 Communications 400 -�-i•8- Telephone EA-change Service 300 2130 Small Toolsand Instruments 150 2250 Rent of Equipment 18,000 2261 Occupancy Costs 5 ,000 2284 Requested -Maintenance 800 2303 Other Travel Employees 100 2305 Freight Dr..ayage . Expense 3 ,100 2310 Professional and Personal Service 550 5022 Cost Applied 7Cagd¢1 osta County RECEIVED JUN ?0 1978 ice of APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST County Administrator AUDITOR-CONTROW ER TO adjust Central Services objects . By: Data COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR�f & JUN 22 19 By: Date / BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sopesvison Ktnny,Fandan YES: SdTockt,Boggess,Hamlt'ne " N0: None OIUN w 7/ 197 J.R. OLSSOR, CL a. ��P.�cLr► ?, S�, ,�- Adm.Svcs,Asst. 6 /16/ 78, SIGNATURE TITLE /y DATE By; APPROPRIATION A POO 5y/ obbie'r ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev.7 SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY l APPROPRIATION' ADJUSTMENT T!C 27 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING Sheriff Institutions ORCANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <IECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM NO OUANTITT 2580 4952 Dryer 0015 0001 248,00 assn -I254E1/,Sf.0,l 001Y a119.#V APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR- NTIRR Ely: lDate 17$ To allow the purchase of a dryer for the main jail. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR t1 By:— Yl Date A� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supmwrs Kenny.Fandah ... YES: Sd,, r,BoS,gm.Hasxhine V J tl NO: None 0 M,2l7198 J.R. OLSSON, CLE 4. �rrl n.��,,f^} �'�=-� " SIGNATURE B�iR �•��- i�„ait�r f. T�T� lI qFF DATE By: APPROPRIATION ARQ0 �31 Robbie G ie ez ADJ. JOURNAL 10. (M 129 Rev, 7/7T) BEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 27 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING Sheriff ORCANIZATION SUS-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OSJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITER 10. IQUANTITY 2595 4955 1. Microwave Orderwire System 0017 5,576.00 2595 4955 1. Voltmeter 0026 1 3,142.00 2595 4951 1. Desk 60 x 30. 0024 ---48.66-- 2595 4955 1. Antenna System 0021 $'�66.gA- M APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTRRLJ_E R 1. To transfer appropriations between existing fixed By: Date 4,/S/ asset budget items and to add one voltmeter, for the radio facilities operation. COUNTD INISTRATOR JUN219 By: Date / BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SDPetvOm Ke°Dy.Fand,, YES: $��..Boggess.Hassc}ciae r V J��l� NO: None d UN/2 7 19 T►-.13LENN, ADMIN, pFFiQO J.R. OL!$ON, C4-'ER I 4. // SIONA - BHERDATE i By: APPROPRIATION Q POO ZY_� Robbieut rrez ADJ. JOURNAL N0. IN 122 Rev. 7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY + APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 !. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CDDiNC da�:ley Fire Protection District - ORCAKIZATION SUB-DEJECT 2. FIXED ASSET l,DECREASE> INCREASE DEJECT OF EXPENSE DA FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. DUANTITT 7017 4956 Fire Hydrant 0012 1 1,255.00 7017 6301 Reserve for Contingency 13255.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDI;F NTROL To replace damaged ,fire hydrant. B ��e / COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: 5t _!Vi(t On,_ Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sppeavison Kenny,Fandm 0000 f f YES: $chrodes,Boggess,Hasseltinc tl tl LltJ t NO: None SUN A 1978 IrJ /IS J.R. OLSSON, GLEBES- — `T J_a�� / TS!Q ATU1tE TITLE GATE By: APPROPRIATION A POO Robbie trez ADJ. JOURNAL 90. (M 129 Rev. 7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA-COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: r utieeK o-�S�oo(S MAy 25 2 17 PH 97S� ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. - FIXED ASSET �bECREASE) INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEItON RA �i3 r�, - UANTIT1f 0601 2110 Communications $ 50.00 0601 2250 Rental of_Equipment 1 ,500.00 0601 4951 Office Equipment and Furhiture 0003 325.00 0993 6301 Schools - Reserve for Contingency " $1,875.00 Co,•; 7 Co!�ta CoUhty [�l cE NED [ TaY 30 '978 O;iice of CoUn I ;� is:'rator rt Admi ._ t, APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION 'OF'REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Our primary iisurance carrier for.`property coverages requires, effective July.l , 1978, installation of a central By �'Ylc�ei�c�CcP Da1e 'SIZ/08 station fire alarm system at our• Educational Media Center, 2371 Stanwell Drive, Concord Cost--to install the COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR electronic fire and smoke detection system and dedicated telephone line is estimated at $1 ,550.08: Monthly rental Aftrges will be budgeted for the 1978979 fiscal year. By: DafallW 2/2. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Purchase price Of two previously budgeted computer terminals is $325.00 more than estimated. Sumvisors Kenny.Fandae YES: Schroder. Boggess.Fiatseltisl (� NO: None 0005. DJUN/2 19 8 Admin. Services J.R. OLSS N, CL 4. Assistant III 5/22/78 StiNATURE TITLE DATE • J. E. Hendrickson APPROPRIATION- A P00,_y1� By: Rbie GpfldVez ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev.1/ SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE 'r • CO'NTROt COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT • T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: CountyAdministrator (Bldgs. & Grounds) ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2, FIXED ASSET <DECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 405 4196 1. Handicapped Improvements Mtz $ 14,750_ 0990 6301 1. Reserve for Contingency $ 14s750. .- 0990 4750. ✓0990 6301 1. Appropriable New Rev 14,750. " APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER ., L-/ �� To increase appropriation for County Community Development Br. r Date Project approved by Community Development Advisory Council COUNTYADMINISTRATOR and Board of Supervisiors on June 9, 1977. Total increased is the difference between C.D. Grant and By: OV N/ amount currently in budgat. ($40,000-$25,250) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supenisors Denny,Fandm YES: s6wdu,B488= 1"Sdif* �9 NO: ��� JUN/2 19 8 On Asst. Co. Admin- J.R. OLSSON, CLE"-- 4 istrator-Finance 6 /21/78 SIeNATURC TITLE � DATE By: Ail APPROPRIATION BOO 7 I D �p Bobbi W= ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (N 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C 24 ACCOUNT CODING LOEFARTNENT OR:ORCANIZATION UNIT: County Administrator (Bldgs. & Grounds) ORCANIZATION REVENUE L INCREASE <DECREASE> ACCOUNT REVENUE DESCRIPTION ly,gsd 0111 9560 1. Federal Aid HUD Block Grant APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER aDate /A171 To increase revenue appropriations for County'd Community Development Project approved by the COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Community Development Advisory. Council and the Board ORIGINAL SIGNED BY of Supervisors on June 9, 1977. By: 1=F WnF2 111 9, Z 1 78 3OARD OF SUPERVISORS Supervisors Kenny.Fandm YES: Schroder.Bows.Hast dtwe N0: None oateJUry 2/7 978 00nn 06MM 0 J R. OLSSON, CLE By: Robbie 4uhVmz REVENUE ADJ. RA0011gz, JOURNAL NO. (M 8134 ?/TT) ` CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT d `_ T/C 2 7 I. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: ACCOUNT CODING SPECIAL ELECTIONS ORGANIZATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET �bECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. 1QUANTITY 2358 1013 Temporary' Salaries $9 ,500 2358 914 FICA 570 2358 2310 -Professional & Personal Servises 13, 200 0990 9970 Reserve for Contingencies $23, 270 Contra Costa Coun RECEIVED JU4 19 1978 Dff ice of Count), Administrat . APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF.REOUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Mt . Diablo School District Recall petitions By lru Date &/►(,/7g were not contemplated- Two. -o.u,tside Key Punch contracts were approved by the Board. Funds COUNT AD NISTRATOR expended will be reimbursed by billing to the District. By: Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: Svpervnm Kenny.rxu': , o�t, •Hanel6 e NO: None 00061 OJUN 2 19 8 J.R. OLSSON CLERK 4. �� COUNTY CLERK 6 /14/7F 816MATURC TITLE DATE By: APPNOPRIATIoM A POO 2;yIW Rdbbie Gum ADJ. JOURNAL 10. (Al 129 Rev. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS OR REVERSE SIDE �. _�r f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY • rV` '\� APPROPRIATION .ADJUSTMENT CV T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING I. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: Walnut Creek-Danville;'Municipal Court' . ORCANHATION SUB-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET -bECREASC> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 0214 1013 Temporary Salaries $7,875 0214 2301 Auto Mileage Employees 165 0214 2303 Other Travel Employees 665 0214 2310 Professional & Personal Service 675 0990 6301 Reserve for Contingencies $9,380 . APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITOR-CONTROLLER The four accounts listed above incurred unantici- pated expenditures in the amounts- indicated: for 2/3/7 By. le �Jh1 Data payments to assigned judges for salary_ differen- tial, mileage and per diem and to their respective COUZT ADMJNISTRATOR counties for their base salary. The costs were curred as a result of unanticipated assignment By: v to � 2/ 19 of Judge Minney to the Superior Court of Contra Costa' County for two months and the assignment of BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Judge Longacre to the Napa Municipal Court for two Snperoisos Kwq,F;Ihdm weeks. The replacement judges served a like YES: Sduokr.W88=•H ""` period in this court. Judge Longacre's salary will: be reimbursed by Napa County and credited to our NO: None revenue account. We are unaware of any reimburse- SUN 7/ 197 men rovisions for Judge Minney's salary. \400 O 062 2/6/78 r J.R. OLSSON, CLERK- Clerk-Administrates SIGNATURE - TITLE' RATE By. �� . ROY L. CHIESA APPROPRIATION g OOS:20�' Robbie (�rrez ADJ. JOURNAL 10. (M 129 RGv. 7/TT) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE .. r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 T ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORGANIZATION UNIT: Tassajara Fixe Protection District ORGANIZATION SUI-OIJECT 2. FIXED ASSET �bECREASI> INCREASE OIJECT OF EXPENSE 01 FIXED ASSET ITEM N0. QUANTITY 7023 4956 Little Giant Ladder 0003 1 234.00, 7023 6301 For Ladder 234,00 AP OVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REOUEST AUDITOR L rP To provide for ladder from reserve for By: note /�/ contingency account. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Dote BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Supe4zors Kenny.Fanden YES: Schroder,BoSScss.Huselcme NO: None ? 8 00fhe OnSU� / j �i�ai?.n�lesN� &o,,O J.R. OLSSON/ CLE 4. OF' ^I�rfAl�sSioiy�/K 46 21614ATURC Tmt p� OAT[ By. ADJROPRI AL NO g POO S L,�D IA1129 Rev. 7/7T) SEE INSTRUCTIONS. ON REVERSE 31DE + f '• • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT T/C 2 7 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTJ�E`T ORluN1I�TI 1�lUt JJ (j GGtiS3 IU Bethel Island Fire Protection District ORCANIIATION SUE-OBJECT 2. t' : TA .cJ'.;Y FIXED ASSET `bECREASE> INCREASE ,0 E1FtLjT;OF`.FXRI�SEOR1XfD ASSET ITEM 90. QUANTITY 7003 4694 Building Insulation 2,890.00 4956 Marine Equipment 0005 1 2,890.00 4956 Tank w/pump for Truck 0011 1 37500.00 4958 Civil Defense Equipment 0006 l 500.00 4734 Paving 3,000.00 4955 Mobile Radio 0012 1 1,200.00 4095 Building Construction 1,200.00 2160 Clothing & Personal Supp 2,750.00 2281 Building Maintenance 2,750.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDITO - TRO Transfer of appropriations to provide the needed By:, Date / -/ fined assets and other expenditures as approved at the Fire Commissioners meeting held 6/8/78. ,60UNTX, AD INISTRATOR� By: "T NDate / 13 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS supervisors Kenny,Fanden YES: Schroder,Bo&Sess.H--J,i- NO: None 00f06I QIP J.R. OLS, QN, CLERk� 4. SIGNATURE ITLE DATE By: APPROPRIATION 00 ADJ. JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev. 7/77; SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE • CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 7 • APPROPRIATION AD..USTAaENT T/C 27 ACCOUNT CODING 1. DEPARTMENT OR ORCANIZATION UNIT: Crockett—Carquinez Fire ORCANIZAT1ON SUE-OBJECT 2. FIXED ASSET <OECREASE> INCREASE OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM 10. QUANTITY 7030 2250 Rental of Equipment 40,000.00 7030 4953 Fire Truck 1 001 23,094.00 7028 4097 Apparatus Storage Bldg. 16,906.00 APPROVED 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST AUDIT TRO To transfer appropriations for truck of General and / Capital Outlay Reserve Funds to Rental of Equipment By: Date v to cover down payment of one new Ford Pumper under a lease/purchase plan. Lease agreement with Bank COUNTY DMI TRATOR of America entered February 1, 1978. By: Date 2v Total price of pumper $59,132.00 Less Down Payment 40,000.00 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Balance payable 3 years $19,132.00 Supervisors Kenny,Fanden YES: Schroder,Boggess,Hasselcine NO: Nc�ne O�UNi2 19"8 _ 00065 J.R. OLSXGON, C!E 4. �► /aT/7 '. j 2 _ SIYMATUR[ TITLE DATE' By: APPROPRIATION A POO ��7� ADJ. JOURNAL N0. (M 129 R4v. 7/77) SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO, WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE,`BE.IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments. For the Fiscal Year 1978=79, - - It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, .therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should becorrected; and in accordance with Sections 4986 and 5096, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund; FURTHER, it has been ascertained by- audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished. by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially hiefer valuation than he would have entered on the roll had the info—mation been correctly furnished; therefore, such error on the roll should be corrected in accordance with Section 4831.5; FURTHER, it has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee failed to report accurately taxable tangible property, to the extent that this failure caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than he would have entered upon the roll had the y property been reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the property not reported should be assessed as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4; and, further, such error caused the assessor to erroneously allow business inventory exemption and, therefore, an escaped assessment in the amount of the portion of the exemption incorrectly allowed because of such erroneous or incorrect information submitted by the taxpayer should be entered pursuant to Section 531.5; together with interest in accordande,with. Section 506; and, in accordance with Section .,533 the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against the proposed escaped assessment for the same tax year; and business inventory exemption allowed in accordance with Section 219 as indicated. Through a clerical error on Board Resolution No. 78/512, dated May 30, 1978, item number 1, page 5 of 6, incorrect values were submitted and action should be rescinded on it (Code 02002–Assmt. No: 2600 for the fiscal year 1975-76, n/o Zehntel, Inc.). And corrections should be made as follows: R. 0. SEATON, Ass't. Assessor t6/19/78 cc_ Assessor (Giese) Auditor Tax Collector oaoss RESOLUTION NO. 72/6.25' Page 1 of Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property "ValueValue' "Change (RJT'Code Zehntel, Inc. For the Fiscal Year 1975=76 Code 02002 Assmt. -No,__2M PS Imps $26,640 $18,340 -$8,250 4831.5,, 4831 Pers Prop 56,540 56,710 + 170 531.4; 506 Bus Inv Ex 27,160 27,230 70 219 Net Change $8,150 . .533 - Assessee has been notified. For the Fiscal Year 1977=78 Arthur McBride and Robt. Downs, Acct, No. 083430-0(100, are erroneously assessed since assessees were not in business on the lien date; therefore,_this. assessment should be• corrected to shoe zero value (no personal property, no. penalty). An audit discloses the following corrections Should he made to the unsecured roll: Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of - to Section Property Value` Value' ' Chance RJT'Code California Peanut Company, Acct: No, 019410-0001 PS Imps $286,575 $266,880 $194695. 4831 Pers Prop 92_22f 99,155 + 6,950_ . 531.4, 506 Bus Inv Ex 44,92? . 48,412 - 3,492. 219 Net Change -$16,237 533 Assessee has been notified, Heath-Riggs Welders Supply, Inc., Acct. No. .057940=0000 PS Imps No Change Pers Prop $ 51,665 $ 55,135 +$3,470 4831.5, .531.4, 506. Bus -Inv Ex 16,297 21,029 _ 4,732 219 Net Change Assessee has been notified. Wentling Studio-Camera Shops, Inc., Acct, No, 138660=0004' Pers Prop $ 4,535 $ 2,265 $2,270 4831.5 . For the Fiscal Year 1976=77 Funding Systems Leasing Corp., Code 14010-Assmt, No. 3750, is erroneously assessed since a portion of the property reported was out of county prior to the lien date; therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show Personal Property $3,600 assessed value. - R. 0. SEATON, Asst. Assessor •oO�r� Page 2 of 1� a .. ,....� .;., ... ,,,,...:c .. 't"_l .....y .. _ ... a ..r 1e .. ...:.✓• a;K,l.s' �`�� -. ' t For the Fiscal Year 1976-•77 An audit discloses the following corrections should be made to the unsecured roll: Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property "Value' "Value" "Change R/T Code California Peanut Company, Acct. 1019410-0001, Code 08001-Assmt. #3841 PS Imps $247,020 $233,285 $13,7355 4831 Pers Prop 114,930 126,480 + 11 ,550 531.4, 506 Bus Inv Ex 50,240 56,010 - 5,770 219 Net Change -$ 7,955 533 Assessee has been notified. - Systron-Donner Corp., Data Products Div. , Code 02031-Assmts #3503 PS Imps No Change Pers Prop $241,420 $237,330 -$4,090 4831.5 Bus Inv Ex 115,410 113,365 + 2,045 531 .5, 506 Net Change . -$2,045 533 Assessee has been notified, For the Fiscal Year 1975=76 Heath-Riggs Welders Supply, Inc., Code 79111-Assmt. #2497. PS Imps - $ 2,250 +$2,250 531.4, 506 Pers Prop $ 44,560 42,425 - 2,135 483125 Bus Inv Ex 12,125 16,940 - 4,815 219 Net.Change -$4,700 533 Assessee has been notified. ' Funding Systems Leas%ng Corp., Code -14010-Assmt. No. 2346, is erroneously assessed since assessee reported property which was out of county prior to the lien date; therefore, this assessment should be corrected to show Personal Property zero value: FURTHER, For the Fiscal Year 197475 Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property _ 'Value' "Value" "Chane (R/T'Code Wentling Studio & Camera Shops, Inc., Code .02002-Assmt. No. .3439 PS Imps No Change Pers Prop $ 31,590 $ 28,895 -$2,695 4831.5 Bus Inv Ex 14,100 13,602 + 498 531.5, 506 Net Change -$2,197 533 Assessee has- been notified. R. 0. SEATON, Asst. Assessor Page 3 of For the Fi,s.cal Year 1974;75 Original Corrected Amount Pursuant Class of Assessed Assessed of to Section Property Value Value' Change - " (R/T Code Wentling Studio-Camera Shops, Inc,, Code 02006-Assmt. 72110 PS Imps $ 4,965 $ 2,255 -$2,710 4831 Pers Prop 10,830 10,465 - 365 4831,5 Bus Inv Ex 5,250 5,068 + 182 531.5, 506 Net Change -$2,893. 533 .- Assessee-has been notified. AND, FURTHER, For the Fiscal Year 1976;77 Hamilton EQuipt. Leasing Corp. , Code 66085-Assmt. No. 8002, is . erroneously assessed since assessee reported property that was,gone prior to; the lien date: therefore, this assessment should be corrected to shows Personal Property zero value. I hereby- consent to the above changes and/or correctio s: R. . SEATON JOHN B . USEN, Cou y Co el Asst. Assessor J JUN 2 7 1978 Depu Adopted by the Board on._..._.- X0069 t Page 4 of 4 �. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. -7g/G Z of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is .authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1978-79 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's books of account or other papers that there has been a defect of description or clerical error of the assessee in his property statement or in other information or records furnished by the assessee which caused the assessor to assess taxable tangible property at a substantially higher valuation than he would have entered 'on the - roll had the information been correctly furnished; therefore, such error on the roll should be corrected in accordance with Section 4831.5 of.the Revenue and Taxation Code; and, FURTHER, that portion of the Business Inventory Exemption which was incorrectly allowed because of such erroneous or incorrect information should be entered as escaped assessment pursuant to Section .531.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code together wit-h. interest on taxes pursuant to Section 506of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and, FURTHER, Business Inventory Exemption in accordance with Section 219 of the Revenue and Taxation Code should be allowed as indicated; and, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 533 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against the proposed escaped assessment- for the same tax year. In Tax Rate Area 86011 , Parcel No. 085-280-002-8, Account No. 027430-0003, ` assessed to Continental Can Co. Inc. , 701 Willow Pass Road, Pittsburg, California, has been erroneously .assessed due to assessee's error in calculation on Business Property Statement. Therefore, this secured assessment should be. corrected as follows: Tax Original Corrected Amount For the Rate Assessed Assessed of R&T Year Area Type of'Property Value . VaTue Change Section 1974-75 86006 Personal Property $433,455 $433,335 -$120 4831 .5 Business Inv. Ex. 175,892 175,832 + 60 531 .5; 506 60 533 1975-76 85006 Personal Property $646,770 $646,625 =$145. 4831-.5 Business Inv. Ex. 281 ,642 281 ,569 + 73 531 .5; .506 72 533 R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor Copies to: Assessor (Graham) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. �g�G .2 SL 00070 0 Parcel No. 085-280-002-8 Tax Original Corrected Amount For the Rate Assessed Assessed of R&T Year Area Type*of'Property Value - Value Change 'Section 1976-77- 86006 .Personal Property ' $376,890 $383,510 +$6,620 531 .4;. 506 Business Inv. Ex. 148,157 151 ,467 =-3;3T0 219 +$3,310 533 1977-78 86011 Personal. Property $498,655 $498,600 -$ .55 4831 .5 Business Inv. Ex. 212,365 . .212,337. ' '+ 28 531.5; 506 27 533 Assessee has been notified. I hereby consent-�to,the-above changes and/or corrections: f R. O. 'SEATON JOHN CLAUSEN, County Counsel Assistant Assessor < t6/20/78 De r__,�_llN1 A&pted by tFe 800.3 on.�_....�-.�.�.----- r/ Page 2 of 2 RESOLUTION N0. 777 00p�1 IN THE BOARD Or SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ,of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 7 / WHERE.SS,. the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessment For the Fiscal Year 1978-79 It has been determined from information received in: the — Assessor's he 'Assessor's Office that a homeowner's exemption claim was incorrectly allowed on the following property because tae claimant did not reside on the property on the lien date of the fiscal year indicated below. Therefore, an escape assessment should be made pursuant to Section 531.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. As the exemption was allowed as 'the result -of a clerical error, interest as provided under Section 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code should be f orgiven. The' assesses has been notified. This correction is to be entered. on the unsecured roll. Escape Assessments for the Fiscal Year 1977-78: On Boat No. CF 0977 CN, Parcel No. 051-040-035-1; Tax Rate Area 53002, assessed to LOUIS 0:. BRITT, the homeowner's axemption of $1,350 allowed by Resolution No. ?7/958 should be rescinded. Assessee has been notified. I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor JOHN B. LAUSEN, County Counsel t/b-19-78 JUN2 7 1978 B Adopted by the Board on.----.-_._... -_ �..__ D y Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) Assessor (Hendrix) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 791.2 3 000 72 IN TIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes j of the Assessment Rol? ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION N0. fg�G.2 d WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; N01d., THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLJED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments For the Fiscal Year 1978-79 It has been determined from information received fr_ the` Assessor's Office that homeowner's exemption claims were incorrectly allowed 'on the following properties because the claimants did not reside on their property on the lien date of the fiscal year indicated below. Therefore, escape assessments should be made pursuant to Sections 531.1 and 531.6 of the Revenue and Taxation .Code. As the. assessees did not timely notify the assessor of their ineligibility for the exemption, a penalty of 25 percent of the amount of the escaped assessment should be applied in accordance with Section 504 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Interest on taxes should be added in accordance with Section- 506 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. The assessees have been notified. Escape. Assessments for to Fiscal Year 1977-78: Tax Rate Amount of Penalty Parcel Number Area Escape (R&T 50L0 Assesses 376-154-0-0-5--7 -77TO-0-6 $1750 --$73-7—.5-0- Nelson, Richard E. & Idell L. 414-062-017-2 08024 $1750 $137.50 San Andres, Turiano & C. C. ' 544--131-013--2 08001 $1750 $437.50 Risby, Charles A. Epstein, Stanley I hereby consent to. the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor JOHN B' CLAUSEN, County Counsel t/6-16-78 B �'J �tU� D y Adopted by the Board on...JUN 27 1978 Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION Na: 0007 IN THE BOARD .OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, .STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of.Changes ) of the Assessment Rall ) RESOLUTION NO. 78 Z/ Z/ of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with.this Board"requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to-by the County Counsel; NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1978-79 It has been ascertained from the assessment' roll and.from"papers in the Assessor's Office`.what was intended and what.should have been assessed; .and, therefore, .pursuant to Section 4831- of the-Revenue and Taxation Code, "the following defects in.description and/or form and clerical errors of..the assessor on the Secured Assessment Roll should be corrected; and, FURTHER, property escap- ing assessment due to such errors should be.enrolled as escaped assessment pur- suant to Section .531 of the Revenue-and Taxation Code; and, FURTHER, Business Inventory Exemptionshould be allowed pursuant.to Section 219 of-the-Revenue and Taxation Code as indicated; and, FURTHER, in accordance with Section •533,of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessed values erroneously or illegally assessed should be offset against proposed escaped assessment for the same tax year; and, FUR7gER, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee, heretofore or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled if it is impossible to complete valid procedures initiated-prior to delinquency date, upon the showing that payment of the correction,or additional amount was made within 30 days from the date correction is entered on the roll or abstract record. In Tax Rate Area 60007, Parcel No. 011-020-003-7,- Account No: 094180-0000, assessed to Ronald E. Nunn and Shirley .A. Nunn, has been erroneously assessed with Personal Property value of $67,635, and no Business Inventory Exemption, due to Assessor's qrror in not enrolling a portion of the property reported by the assessee to the assessment roll . Therefore, this secured parcel should be enrolled with escape assessment as follows: ' . Original Corrected Amount For the Assessed Assessed of R&T. Year Type of Property Value Value 'Change Section 1977-78 Personal Property $67,635 $82,095 +$14,460 4831; 531 Business Inv. Ex. -0- 7,230 =-'7,230 219 +' 7,230 533 Assessee has been notified. - I hereby consent to the above / changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHN LAUSEN, County Counsel Assistant Assessor t6/15/78 Copies to: Assessor (Graham) De Auditor Tax Collector Adopted by the Board on.__JUN_2 7 1978 RESOLUTION N0. T�/�,�,/ Page 1 of 1 000` 4 r se*r 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the matter of the Cancellation of ) Uncollected Penalty & Interest On ) RESOLUTION NO. G a2,0 Assessment Reduced by Assessment ) Appeals Board/Officer. ) (Rev. & Tax C. §S2922.5, L985) Auditor's ;iemo: Pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code Secs. 2922.5 and 4985, I recommend cancellation from the following assessments on the unsecured roll, of penalties and interest which have attached erroneously because such assessments were reduced by the Assessment Appeals Board or the Assessment-Appeals Hearing Officer. Donald L. Bouchet, I consent to this cancellation. Acting County Auditor Controller JOHN B. CLAUSEN, Coiinty Counsel ' ' By: eputy By: - Deputy The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES MAT: Pursuant to the above authority and recommendation, the County Auditor shall cancel penalties and interest on the following unsecured assessments: For Year 1977-78 02966o-Fool PASSED Ak\D ADOPTED on JUN 2 7 jg78 by unanimous vote of the Supervisors present County Auditor 1 County Tax Collector 2 Rnsecured) edemption) RESOLUTIO.� NO. 00075 �7! IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Cancellation of ) l a Portion of Additional Penal ties ) RESOLUTION NO. on 1975-76 Unsecured Tax Roll. ) The Office of the County Treasurer-Tax Collector having received a remittance in the amount of $1,132.41 from James H. Riggs, Trustee in Bankruptcy, which represents a Claim priority in full payment of a tax claim filed on the following: Fiscal Year 1975-76 Code 2GO2 Assessment 8086 McMahan, W. R. McMahan, IW7 Ann 5486 Florida Drive Concord, CA A521 DBA: M & M Vending Co. Inventory; Supplies; Office Furniture & Equipment; Tools, Molds, Dies, Jigs; Equipment, out on, or held for, Lease or Rent to Others Assessed Valuation - Personal Property $7,768 Exemption - 105 $7.,663 Tax, Tangible Property $963.77 6A Penalty 57.82 $11021-59 And the Tax Collector-Treasurer having requested that authorization be granted for cancellation of a portion of the additional penalty, as provided under provisions of the Bankruptcy Act; N(7W, THLREFDRE, IT IS ORDERED that the request, of the County Treasurer- Tax Collector is APPROVED. IMUARD W. LuAL Treasurer-Tax Collector Deputy Tax Collector i� {.i t: �� i:� r`_' ✓G�:li: �i::i� _ � day of • ���. cc: County Auditor County Treasurer-Tax Collector IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Approval of the Final Map ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/626 and Subdivision Agreement, ) Subdivision •5280, ) San Ramon Area. ) The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: The Final Map of Subdivision 5280, property located iri the San Ramon area, said map having been certified by the proper officials.- A Subdivision Agreement with Ignacio Creek Development Corporation Subdivider, wherein said Subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said Subdivision Agreement within one year from_ the date of said Agreement; _ Said documents were accompanied by the -following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 10129, June 15, 19780 in the amount of $1,000, deposited by: Ignacio Creek Development Corporation. b. A cash deposit in the amount of $800 (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 10121, June 15, 1976) , deposited by Ignacio Creek Development Corporation, $200 Faithful Performance and $600 Labor & Materials. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and. that the 2977-78 tax lien has been paid in full and the 1978-79 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March, '1978, is estimated to be $142,000; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bond No. 6009795 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland with Ignacio Creek Development Corporation as principal, in the amount of $142,000 guaranteeing the payment. of the estimated tax; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Final Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Subdivision Agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. • Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: PWD-LD Director of Planning Ignacio Creek Development Corporation 2924 Central Ave. Alameda, CA 94501. RESOLUTION NO. 78/626 RECEIVED .. , -jON .271978 SUBDUTISIM err J. R. OLSSON (G.--v=t Lent Code §§66462 and §§66463) CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. B mk 5 2 80 [51] Effective Date: June 27, 1978 [§1] Subdivider: Ignacio k Develop. C or p J511 Completion Period: 1 year 1. PARTIES & Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "Com,\and the above-nad Subdivider, mutually promise r and agree as follows, concerning the s subdivision: i 2. IMPRONVEMUS. Subdivider agrees to install certain road improvements .(both public and private) , drainage improvements, signs, street lights, fire hydrants, landscaping, and such other improvements (i.ncluding appurtenant equipment) as required in the improvement plans for this subdivision as reviewed and on file with the Contra Costa County Public Works Department and in conformance-with the Contra Costa. County Ordinance Code (including future amendments thereto). Subdivider shall complete said work and improvements [hereinafter called "work"] within the above carpletion period fran date hereof as required by the California Subdivision Map Act [Government Code 5§66410 and following] , in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict betraeea the improvement plans and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GMURA= AMID WAP.RANTY OF THOM Subdivider guarantees that said work shall be free from defects in material or wofkmanship and shall perform se isfactorily for a period of one (1) year from and after the Board of Supervisors accepMs the work as complete in accordance with Article 96-4.6, "Acceptance", of the Ordinance Code. Sub- divider agrees to correct, repair, or replace, at his expense, any defects in said work. The guarantee period does not apply to road improvements for private roads, which are not to be accepted into the County road system. 3A. PLANT ESTAIMIShMMU WORK Subdivider agrees to performs plant establishment work for landscaping installed under this agreere_*mt. Said plant establistsrw..nt *cork shall consist of adequately watering plants, replacing unsuitable plants, doing weed, rodent and other pest control and other work.detexmiu ed by tl:e Public Works Department to be necessary to insure establishment of the plants. Said plant establishment work shall be performed for a period of one (1) year from and after the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as axmplete. 4. MPROVMM SBCUP=: Upon executing this agreement, the Subdivider shall, pursuant to Government Code §966499, and the County Ordinance Code, provide as security to the County: A. For Performance and Guarantee: $ 1000 cash, plus additional security, in the amount of $ 200 which together total one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated cost of the work. Such additional security is presented in the foam of: X Cash, certified check, or cashier's check .Acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the Subdivider guarantees perfommance under this agreement. B. For Payment: Security in the amount of $ 600 which is fifty percent (50%) of the estunated cost of the work. Such security is presented in the foam of: X Cash, certified check, or cashier's check Acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the Subdivider guarantees payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equiprent or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. C. Upon acceptance of the work as complete by the Baird of Supervisors and upon request of the Subdivider, the amount of the securities may be reduced in accordance with Sections 94-4.406 and 94-4.408 of the Crdinance Code. 00078 Microfilmed with board order t 1 -2- S. IMPROVEMENT PLAN Lr,RRMTY Subdivider warrants the improvement plans for the work are adequate to accomplish the work as promised in Section 2 and as required by the Conditions of Approval for the Subdivision. If, at any time before-the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as ccrrplete or during the one year guarantee period, said improvement plans prove to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make whatever changes are necessary to accomplish the work as premised. z I 6. NO MINER BY COUN'T'Y. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of j works and/or materials or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his I obligation to fulfill this agreement as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby . estopped fron bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any I of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. IlQDETZ.=. Subdivider shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the ]1 abil'-hies as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this prbmmise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, cocmmi.ssions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemiaticn, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforseeable at any time before the County reviewed said improvesment plans or accepted the work as complete, and including the defense of any suit (s) , action (s) or other proceeding (s) concerning said liabilities and claims. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connec`a- on with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor or any officer, agent or erployee of one or more of them. D. Non-co_nditi.ons: The promise and agreement in this section are not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or reviewed any plan (s) or specification (s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly frau any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. 8. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work:, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey =)numents in accordance with the filed mop and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor before acceptance of any work as complete by the Board of Supervisors. 10. NONPERFOFVANC'E AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the works within the time specified in this agreement, and subsequent extensions, or fails to maintain the work, the County may proceed to arnplete and/or maintain the work by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider agrees to pay all costs and charges incurred by the County (including, but not limited to: engineering, inspection, surveys, contract, overhead, etc.) immediately upon demand. Once action is taken by County to complete or maintain the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all costs incurred by the County, ever: if Subdivider subsequently completes the work. Should County sue to carpel performance under this Agreement or to recover costs incurred in completing or maintaining the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all attorney's fees, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith, even if Subdivider subsequently proceeds to complete the work. 11. ASSIGZ=. If, t,.-fore the Board of Supervisors accepts the works as omplete, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreznent and/or any deposit, bond, or letter of credit securing said rights. 00079 �I I -3- -12. AS-BUILT PLANS. Before acceptance of the improvements by the Board of Supervisors, the Subdivider (or his Engineer) shall furnish the Department of Public- Works a complete set of acceptable 35MM microfilm copies of the original tracings of inprovenent plans for the subdivision (including all revisions thereto) . 13. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof", County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the Final Map or Parcel Map for said Subdivision. I i :CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (see note below) f . Vernon L. Cline, � • . Public Works Director L14 r � Deputy � ��� - •� RECCMENIDED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivrir?er: Execute acknowledgment form below; and if a corporation, affix rate seal. i J By: `l . (CORPORATE SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel State of California - ) (Acknowledgement by Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) County of Contra Costa )ss On June 13 1978 the .person (s) whose name (s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who as/are known to me to be the individual (s) and officer (s) or partner (s) as stated above who signed this instrument, personally m appeared before e and acknowledged to m` that t hey(executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed itl (NOTARSAL SEAL) . of ICIAL SEAT. VICTOR L. HAI-4-50N 1. 4• ~��' ,� NOTAR-9 1,1WLIG-CAUFOI IA COUNTY•Or AIAt'EDA Aly Urmissiv�.><pires RTITCD3� WO-1.1382 O 2 S IV Notary Public for said County and State (Subdiv. Agrmt. CCC Std. Foam) LD 9 (rev. 5/8/78) . 00080 i Tax Col lector's Office COrltra Edward"'' Leal: County Treasurer Tsx Collector i •: Amed P. Lomeli P.O.Box 631 Costa Assistant TreesUrer Tsx Collector Mar Court Street Mart �* Martinez.California 94553 (415)372-4122 June 16, 1978 IF THIS TRACT IS NOT FILED BY OCTOBER 31, 19 78, THIS LETTER IS VOID • i .i This will. certify that I have examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: Tract 5280 The Vintners (Condo) (San Ramon Area) and have determined from the official tax records that there are' no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property, included in the map. The tax lien has been paid in full. Our.estimate of the 1978-79 t- ax lien, which became a lien on the; first.day of March. __Me is $ 142,C00.Co Subdivision bond must be presented to County Tax Collector for review and approval of adequacy of security, prior to filing with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. EDWARD W. LEAL Treasurer - Tax Collector By: L��t 00081 RECEIVED J PJ 27 1979 J. R. O4s.;Ow Microfilmed with board order CLERK 80AP0 o: sua:avisoes C NIRA OSTA Q. The premiurn charged for 11ONDi AI;:. J1ST TAXES this bond is $29840.00 per • . annum. )��l KNOW ALL I•:EiN BY THESE PRESENTS : • THAT Ignacio Creek Development Corporation , as•princIpal . and (Sure'L;v `- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland a corporation organized and existinr tinder the laws of the State of Maryland and authorized to transact surety business in California as surety are held and firmly bound unto the Counter of Contra Costa' State of California, in the penal suin of One hundred Forty Two Thousand and No/100-----=------------Dollars ( 142,000.00 , to be paid to the said County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which ,,.,ell and truly to be r. made, we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors , administrators , and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by .these presents . I ' Sealed with our seals and dated this 15th day of I June 19 70 The conditions of the above obli.ration is such that WHEREAS, the I above bounded principal is about to file a map entitled Subdivision 5280 and covering a subdivision of a tract of land in said County of Contra -Costa, and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, against the said Tract of land covered by said map, which taxes and special assessments collected as taxes , are not yet due or payable. NO6l3 THEREFORE, if the said Ignacio Creek Development Corporation shall pay all of the taxes and special assessment-s 'collected as taxes which are a lien against said tract of land covered by said map, at the time of the filing of said map of said Tract , then this obligation shall be void and of no effect. Otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect . IGNACIO CREEK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION � -.4 te � rt Principal Principal / FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (BY SURETY) Er on Delventlial Attorney--in-Fact State of California ) City and County of pan Francisco ) County in which acknowledgement is taken On June 15th, 1978 before me, Lee Moalia a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeare Erbon Delventhal kno:•rn to me to be Attorney-in-Fact of the corporation that executed the within Instru- ment and also known to lue to be the pet-son who executed it on behalf of such corporation and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a rezoltition of its board of directors. `,ra UFFICIAL VAL. Q. --.R LEE MOGLIA _ i •L c�-� `r2,` -��' s, , NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA ` tri Addition t0 Sig ature Type or Yrint T COUNTY-OF SAN FRANCISCO � Larne of Notary Lee •i!loglia -My Commission Expires May 31,1980 ^ NOTARY PUBLIC RECEIVED _ JUNE-7197 0082 J. R. o!S:ON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Microfilmed with board order B m RA TA o. IN TIIE BOARD 0f' SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Approval of the Final Map ) and Subdivision Agreement ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/627 Subdivision 4955, ) Alamo Area. ) The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: The Final Map of Subdivision 4955, property located in the Alamo area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A Subdivision Agreement with Ircal Corporation, Subdivider, wherein said Subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said Subdivision Agreement within one year from the date of said Agreement; Said documents were accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Cash deposit(Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 10205, June 19, 1978�. in the amount of $2,015, deposited by: Ircal Corporation. b. A cash deposit in the amount of $300,250 (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 10205, June 19, 1978) deposited by Ircal Corporation'., $199,500 for Faithful Performance and $100,750 for labor and materials; Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 19;7-78 tax lien has been paid in full and the 1978-r9 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of March, 1978, is estimated to be $15,000; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows : Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit, Detail No. 10205, June 15, 1978) in the amount of $15,000 'deposited by Ircal Corporation Security to guarantee the -widzing of Stone Valley Road as required by the Conditions of Approval, as follows: Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail 'No. 10205, June 19, 1978), in the amount of $14,700; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Final Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Subdivision Agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Divi--ion cc: PWD-LD Director of Planning Ircal Corporation 1000 fourth Street Sar_ Rafael, CA 94901 RESOLUTION NO. 78/627 . (('ovenurir nt ( crJ6 §' G6462 and 596G463) ►.. i.91) Subdivision: 4955 [§1] i,;f.fcct-ivc axile: June 27, 1978 [§1] Subdivider: IRCAL CORPORATION [§1] Conpletion Period: 1 year 1. PARTIES & DAZE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "CountY", and the above-named Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows, concerning this subdivision: 2. IMPROVIIMMS. Subdivider agrees to install certain road inproverents (both public and private) , drainage improvements, signs, street lights, fire hydrants, 1 landscaping, and such other improvements (including appurtenant equipment) as .required i `! in the improvement plans for this subdivision as reviewed and on file with the Contra S Costa County Public Wti rks Department and in conformance with the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code (including future amendments thereto) . Subdivider shall complete said work and improvements [hcruinafter called ' "work"] within the above corTrpletion period from date hereof as required by the , California Subdivision I L---ip Act [Government Code .5§66410 and following] , in a good wurknonlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner .� equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plans and the County I Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GUARANIS AND MMANTY Or t:URK. Subdivider guarantees that said work shall be free from defects in-material or worknm-mship and shall perform satisfactorily for a period of one (1) year from and after the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as con1dete in accor&-ince with Article 96-4.6, "Acceptance", of the Ordinance Code. Sub- divider agrees to correct, repair, or replace, at his expense, any defects in said work. The guarantee period does not apply to road improvements for private roads,. which are not to be accepted into the County road system. 3A. PLANT ESFABLISIMM' P10RK Subdivider agrees to perform plant establishment work for landscaping installed under this agreement. Said plant establishment work shall consist of adequately watering plants, replacing unsuitable plants, doing weed, rodent and other pest control and other work determined by the Public Works Department to be necessary to insure establishment of the plants. i Said plant establishment work shall be performed for a period of one (1) year fran and after the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as corrplete. ] 4. II»TROVEb1Et`]T SECURITY: Upon executing this agreement, the Subdivider shall, s pursuant to Government Code§§66499, and the County Ordinance Code, provide as security to the County: ! A. ror Performance and Guarantee: $2-015. gash, plus additional security, in +he amount of $199.485 which together total one hundred percent (100%) of the ` estimated cost of the work. Such additional security is presented in 'the form of: x Cash, certified check, or cashier's check., Acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the Subdivider guarantees performrance under this agreement. B. mor I?a�r[ment: Security in the amount of $ 10q 7J O , which is fifty percent (50%) of the estimated cost of the work. Such security is presented in the form of: _X Cash, certified check, or cashier's check Acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the SLIxlivider guarantees payment to the contractor, to 166 sulxx,ntsrciCt()r:s, ;411(1 to persons rent-irxj equipaent or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. C. Upon acceptance of the work as complete by the Board of Supervisors and upon request of the Subdivider, the amount of the securities may be reduced in accordance with Sections 94-4.406 and 94-4.408 of the Ordinance Code. Mkr�al ed %W-1h•'board ordef 5. DIPROVU1LiNT PLAN 1,YMNV'Y Sulxli.vidcr warrants the improvenx,nt plans for the work are adequate to acconplish the work as promised in Section 2 and as rogkiired by the Conditions of Approval for the SidAivi_sion. If, at any t.inr_ ilio I;cku:d of f Supervisors accepts the work as complete oi- during the one year guarantee period, said improvement plans prove to be inadc-quite in any resnect, Subdivider shall make whatever changes are necessary to accomplish the work as promised. 6. NO IVAIVER BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County 1 indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements.of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, ( or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his f obligation to fulfill this agreement as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages arising from the failure -to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. IIyMINITY. . Subdivider shall defend, hold harmless and i.ndennify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: i A. The indernitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its specialdistricts_, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents J and employees.. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, - and including personel'injury, death, property damage,. inverse condemnation, or any combination of these.; and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforseeable at any time before the County revicnrecl said improvement plans or accepted the work as ccoplete, and including the defense of any s, t (s) , action (s) or other proceeding (s) concerning said liabilities and claims. C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor or any officer, agent or• eiTployee .of one or more of them. D. Non-conditions: The promise and agreement in this section are not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or reviewed any 1 plan (s) or specification (s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. 8. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work., including inspections thereof and. relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed vaP p and to the satisfaction of the County Road Ccnnii.ssioner-Surveyor before acceptance of any work as complete by the Board of Supervisors. 10. NONPERFORMANCE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails -to complete the work within the time specified in this agreement, and sdjscxpu(_:nt extensions, or fails to maintain the work, the County noy proceed to canplete and/or maintain the work by contract or otherwise; and Subdivider agrees to pay all costs and charges incurred by the County (including, but not limited to: engineering, inspection, surveys, contract, overhead, etc.) immediately upon demand. Once action is taken by County to complete or maintain the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all costs incurred by the County, even if Subdivider subsequently completes the work. Should County sue to coq-)-1 performance under this Acp-eem,nt or to recover costs incurred in c:ompleti-ncl or maintaining the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all attorney's fees, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith, even if Subdivider subsequently proceeds to complete the work. 11. ASSIGMURP. If, Ix--fore Lhu lxiard of Sulx::rvi:;,Drs acc.�pt-s thy, work as coPplete, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit, bond, or letter of credit securing said rights. - _— 000 1 12. AS-BUILT PLANS. Before acceptance of the i=rovenents by the Board of Supervisors, the Subdivider (or his Enclincer) shall furnish the DecarbTent of Public. Vbrks a ca-!lplete set of acceptable 351T-1 ndcrof_ihn copies of the original tracings of Liprovement plans for the_subdivision (includingall revisions thereto) . 13. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the Final Map or Parcel Map for said Subdivision. • i '1 C M'FA COSTA COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (senote below) + � + Vernon L. Cline, Public Vbrks Director �RCAL LhORAIION. man i Gnaz Putt Kamran Fo ice PresidentI Mehdi Afs ar, V ce PreMident1 RECCII`4ENDED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivirler: Execute acknowledgment ! form helot,:; and if a corporation, affix Irate seal. By: (CORPURATE SEAL) MR4 APPROVED: JOHN B. CLAUSEV, County Counsel { _S 1 State of California ) (Acknowlcdyemmnt by Coi-poration, Partnership, or Individual) County of �.t t_-L� ).ss 1 • t On . ,LC--;\.c _ / (c ( 6? .' a the person. (s) whose nam2 (s) is/ signed above for Subdivider and who is/are known to me to be the individual (s) • I and officer (s) or partner (s). as stated above who sidled this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to me that +hej executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) sueinuutiuunu�nunnn;tt:»:uauueu3luuc.j - CFFI:IAL`•C1kL DECIBIE A PRE-SCO N01-Afi•i FUB!IC ojA IFORPJIA r is P:inupal 0l11ce Counly j Y r c . C C AIV Comnl ssien C,I ci l,u,.3.1?11 Notary Publicor Said County and State Bunuouttrttttnnnnrtttnt:rt,tt ra;:nts:nuaa� (Subdiv. Ag>mt. CCC Std. Form) .1D 9 (rev. 5/8/78) . RECEIVED JUN 2_x71978 J. R. OLS'ON CLERK BOARD OF SUAPE 4 XC O ISORS B 4 - - - ..�•jt s dward . Leal Tax Collector's Office Contra County reewrerr-Tex Collector `' Costa reamer P.O.Box 631 Assistant Treasurer-Tax Collector, Court Street Mar County '� Martinez,California 94553 (415)372.4122 June 16, 1978 IF THIS TRACT IS NOT FILED BY OCTOBER 31, 19 78 , THIS LETTER IS VOID i This will certify that I have examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: Tract 4955 San Raison lrea and have determined from the official tax records that there are no unpaid -County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in .the map. The 1977-19 Itax lien has been paid in full. Our estimate of'the 1978-79 tax-lien, which became a lien- on the first day of March,- jo7 is "$ 15,000.00 Subdivision bond must be presented to County Tax Collector for review and approval* of adequacy of security, prior to filing with the Clerk of the Board--of Supervisors. EDWARD W. LEAL Treasurer - Tax Collector. By: RECEIVED JUN o7_7 1978 J. R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS NT C 8 board order ic�rofilmed with M BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,. CALIFORNIA Re: Eliminate Expenditure Sub-objects ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/628 from Proposed Budget. Tabulation.- -) (2 Cal.Admin.Code §965) June 27 1978 - WHEREAS the Proposed Budget for fiscal year 1978-1979 as compiled by the County Administrator has been the subject of complete revision in order to conform to the provisions of Art. XIIIa of the California Constitution (Proposition 13, the "Jarvis-Gann Initiative") approved by the electorate on June 6, 1978, which greatly reduces the amount of property taxes available to finance programs and services which nor- mally have been provided for the residents of the County; and WHEREAS, in view of the significant program and service cuts which will be required to-,conform to the reduced funding available and- to ensure that the health and safety of the community will not be jeopar- dized, the Governor has approved Senate Bill 154 which will provide financial assistance to local government; and WHEREAS a number of uncertainties must be clarified and the---tabu- lation of the Proposed Budget must be considerably revised which will require additional time and effort to complete while Government Code Section 29062 requires that the tabulation of the Proposed Budget must be presented to the Board of Supervisors on or before June 30, 1978; and WHEREAS pursuant to Title .2, Section 965' of the California Admin- istrative Code, a county may elect to eliminate the use of sub-objects of expenditures, other than for fixed assets, from the budget document by adoption of a' resolution by a four-fifths vote of the Board; and such elimination will speed up final tabulation of .the Proposed Budget; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board that it is in the best interest of the County to eliminate the use of sub-objects of expenditures, other than for fixed assets, from the budget document for fiscal year 1978-1979. PASSED on June 27,1978, by at least a •four-fifths vote of the Board. AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine, and R. I. Schroder. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. cc.: County Administrator _ County Auditor-Controller County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 78,628 4008.8 County AdministratorCon}�� Board of Supervisors ` James P.Kenny County Administration Building �s�,}� 1st District h-fartineZ,California 94553 Nancy C.Fanden (415)372-5030 Counbj 2nd District Arthur G.Will Robert t.Schroder County Administrator 3rd District Warren E.Boggess 4th District Eric H.Hasseitine RECEIVED June 27, 1978 JUN 2 7197 J. R. - N CLER A. UPERV Its Board of Supervisors e _ N • COSTA Administration Building, Room B12 , Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Board Members: RE: Transition Program for Proposition 13 The Legislature adopted the report of the Conference Committee on June 23, 1978 and enacted the transition program for Proposition 13 in the form of Senate Bill 154. A copy of the summary of this program was provided to you yesterday. The funding levels provided in this bill appear to make it unnecessary for the Board to act on elimina- tion of a large number of positions in the county structure and the layoff of a substantial number of county employees today. This action is, therefore, not being presented for your consideration at this time. While we feel confident that major layoffs will not be necessary, we are not completely certain of the funding levels provided in the state assistance, and the complexity of the measure will require at least a few days to determine with any degree of precision. The following program, therefore, is presented for consideration and final adoption of the 1978-1979 budget: 1. Presentation of Budget Message by June 30, 1978 It has been our intention all along to present the appropriation and revenue requirements on June 30 'as required 'by law. These requirei ants would consist of the Proposition 13 level funding as .adopted by your Board on June 20, 1978 plus the amount of state assistance which would be received under SB 154. We will continue with this plan, and I believe that the two or three days available to us during the remainder of this week will be sufficient time to assess the amount of state assistance necessary. 2. Salary Provisions of SB 154 The provisions of SB 154 condition any state assistance on the fact that no cost of living increases may be granted employees or other persons such as welfare recipients in excess of state employees. 00000 Micro.ilmed with board-order , f r 2. Since no action has been taken on the state level, increases as provided in existing memorandum of understanding are null and void. The Couzity Counsel will discuss this matter in' greater detail. 3. Board Consideration of Proposed Budget Normally the Board of Supervisors adopts the County Administrator's Budget Message as the Proposed Budget and schedules hearings during the month-of August prior to final adoption and setting of the tax rate. We would suggest that this step be taken . . on July 5 using the submittal mentioned above which will be filed on Friday. The adoption of this document will allow the Auditor to print the Proposed Budget in accordance with provisions of the Government Code and you may set the date for final public hearings to begin sometime during the middle of August. 4. Board Committee Meetings The Finance Committee could commence at any time after July 5 to schedule meetings for consideration of the general county budget and, under provisions. of SB 154, hearings for special districts. This process could continue as in the past, culminating in a final report from the committee to the full Board of Super visors prior to the beginning of formal public hearings on the budget in August. 5. Special Districts The Board will wish to establish a special procedure for the purpose of apportioning property tax funds to the various special districts as provided in SB 154. Both the subjects of apportionment and the establishment of service levels for police and fire are covered' in this section. 6. Transition Period Under Proposition 13 Both committees of the Board, as well as the full Board itself, will have the responsibility for maintaining the momentum of reorganizing the financing of county government within the one-year period which SB 154 provides. A myriad of problems must be .addressed and solved early during this 1978-1979 fiscal year in order 0009a 3. that a viable program is adopted and ready when temporary state assistance is either eliminated or substantially reduced for 1979-1980. A work program will be recommended by this office with suggested dates for final decisions on various areas of county service and financing. The Board as a whole will wish to discuss these matters at early meetings in July, and we will be prepared to provide all of the information available at these -times. _--- ctfully. ARTHUR G. WILL(,,(`J� County Administrator AGW•sr 4.0091. r FROM: County Supervisors Association of California filth and L Building, Suite 201 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 441-4011 CONTACT: Richard Watson or Peggy Brownlow STATEMENT BY SANDRA R. SMOLE1, PRESIDENT COUNTY SUPERVISORS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA FOR RELEASE 6/23 IF CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON SB 154 IS APPROVED: "Very pleased," was the reaction of the President of the County Supervisors Association of California to the Legislature's action in allocating $1.48 billion to counties. "The counties were seeking a simple and equitable response to the needs of county government," said Sandra Smoley, CSAC President and a Sacramento County Supervisor, "and that's what we got. The Legislature has done an out- standing job in the short time available to implement Prop. 13. "Counties will still have significant service cuts and employee layoffs, but the Legislature's action assures that critical safety and health needs can be met. "We are concerned, however, that the state's action to pay counties' health and welfare costs for 1978-79 is only a one-year proposal. These are state programs, and should be assumed permanently by the state, not paid from property taxes. "If these programs need to be cut, counties believe the best solution would be for the state to immediately begin planning to assume these programs on an ongoing basis. $$However, the Legislature's work was done in a spirit of compromise and cooperation, and .the counties are very pleased that the Legislature has recognized the importance of the state-county relationship with their Prop. 13 implementation measure." # # 00092 Microfilmed with board order C O N T E N T S Subject Page Summary Fiscal Chart 1 property Tax Allocation 2 Emergency Loan Fund 3 State Assistance -- Cities 4 -- Counties 5 -- Special Districts 7 -- Schools K - 14 8 State and Local Government Employee 12 pay provisions i oao�� SUMMARY TABLE Revenues and Projected Tax Revenue Losses by Type of Government Assuming Pro-Rata Property Tax Distribution and Allocation of State Surplus to Approximate a Net Loss of Total Revenues of 108 1976-79 (dollars in millions) Property Tax*____�__. Total Loss as 8 Revenues-- Before After Revenue State Net of Total All Sources* Prop.13 Prop.13 Reduction Surplus Loss Revenues Cities (except S.F.) $ 5,292 $ 11348 $ 542 $ 606 $ 250 $ 556 10.58 Counties (including S.F.) 7,740** 31801 10565 2,236• 1,450 756 9.88 � Schools 121, 2267 125 6 468 2x929 3 ,539 � 11272 10.58 Sp.Districts(Non-Enterprise) 961 366 172 216 125 91 9.58 (Enterprise) 4,407 443, 196 247 0*' 247 5.68 TOTALS: $30,165 $12,448 $5,404 $7,044 $4,122 $ 2,922 9.7 % *includes property taxes to repay prior voter-approved indebtedness, which are above the It limitation; property tax figures also include state property tax subventions. C "exclusive of $1.911 'billion in federal aid attached to AFDC--a state buyout would shift this revenue to the state, and thus lower the counties' total revenue base. most of the $125 million for special districts would go to non-enterprise districts; however, enterprise districts may receive an unknown portion of this total. ALLOCATION OF $4. 3 BILLION PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS The property taxes collected pursuant to the remaining 1% limitation of Proposition 13 will be distributed_ to each juris- diction which- .collects a property tax on a pro rata basis.- The basis for this -pro rata distribution for al1.'jurisdictions-' except schools will be the average percentage of the total `county-wide property taxes collected by each jurisdiction over the past three years. The pro rata distribution for schools will be based only , on the 1977-78 property tax revenues. Each county must levy the entire $4.00 tax rate (1%) , and , no other jurisdiction may levy a general property tax. However, each entity of;government ,may levy its own property tax- to pay only the voter approved indebtedness exempted fromthe1% limitation by Proposition 13. The 1978-79 assessment roll is defined as the 1975-76 assessment roll increased by (1) reassessments necessary to bring property up to its 197S value; (2) reassessments allowed by Proposition 13 fos resales and new construction;. and (3) 2% per year annual inflation since 1975. "Change of ownership" for purposes of valuation is defined. 0 - 2 - 00095 LOCAL AGENCY EMERGENCY LOAN FUND The following major provisions are included in a $900 million local agency emergencv loan fund: 1. The State will serve as a lender of last resort. 2. The local agency's governing body must -certify that funds are not sufficient to meet expenses prior to December 31, 78; substantial evidence must back up the certification. In addition, they must adopt a resolution containing the following: a. a statement that the local agency is authorized to issue revenue or tax anticipation notes; b.. a statement that taxes, revenues and other income not obligated by law for a specific purpose and anticipated to be received during the 1978-79 fiscal year, will be available to repay the principal and interest on such loan before June 30, 1979'; and c. a statement that revenue and tax anticipation notes are not currently being purchased from the local agency by private lenders. 3. The Pooled Money Investment Board will approve or deny the loan applica- tions and will set the interest rate equal to the prevailing market. interest rate for tax anticipation notes. It will be approximately one-- half the current Pool rate. 4. The. amount loaned will be limited to 50 percent of the property tax revenues collected by the local agency in 1977-78. . 5. The repayment of money borrowed will constitute a first lien, and the loan will be repaid from the agency's taxes, revenues, and other income .as they become available. 6. The timetable for this program is structured in the following manner: a. All applications will be in to the Board by August 15,_,1978. b. All loans will be approved or denied by August 31, 1978. c. All loans will be repaid by June 30, 1979 . 7. out of the Emergency Loan Funds, $30 million has been set aside for loans to local 'agencies with non-voted bonds, such as tax allocations and lease-purchase bonds, to prevent default of such bonds.- - 3 - 00096 i ALLOCATION OF $2S0 MILLION STATE. ASSISTANCE TO CITIES State assistance to cities will be distributed directly to each city which sustained a property tax loss under Proposition 13. The apportionment will .be on the basis of each city' s property tax loss in relation to the property tax loss of all cities statewide. Cities are required to use the state assistance first to ensure continuation of the same level of police and fire protection as was provided in 1977-78. Cities are, however, authorized to effect cost savings if such steps do not impair the protection provided. The distribution made to any city shall be reduced by one- third of the cities ' surplus revenues or reserves which are in excess of S$ of the district' s total 1977-73 revenues . - 4 - 00097 ALLOCATION OF $1.48 BILLION STATE ASSISTANCE TO COUNTIES I. To relieve counties of their fiscal liability for the costs of the following programs : (in millions) A) Medi-Cal $ 418 B) SSI/SSP 168 C) AFDC • grants 281 a administration 88 • BHI (state assumes 95% of the non-federal costs) 92 D) Food stamp administration 21 � 1, 068 Less cost-of-living increases not granted AFDC recipients -24 Subtotal T1,044 II. Block grant assistance to counties to be. allocated to the counties on the basis of each county's net property tax revenue loss after taking into consideration the assistance provided under part I. 436 total $1,480 Counties are required to use this block grant assistance first to ensure the same level of police and fire protection as was provided in 1977-78. Counties are, however, authorized to effect cost savings if such steps do not impair the protection provided. The distribution made to any county shall be reduced by one- third of the county surplus revenues or reserves which are in excess of five percent of the district's total 1977-78 revenues . III. Modification of "Beilenson Act" health service reduction pro- cedures for one year. a Service reductions in county's net costs for public health services, inpatient health services, outpatient health services, or these services provided under contract by cities may occur with waiver of Beilenson Act, if such reductions are not disproportionate to the county's net 5 - OOO(1Q property tax revenue- loss after receiving state support: 1) counties will submit budgets to State Director of Health Services for determination of whether such reductions are disproportionate; 2) in the event the Director determines a reduction is disproportionate the county will hold a public hearing and make a finding on whether such reduction is detrimental to the health care needs of the public; 3) the Director will review the findings and, if the Director determines the reduction is detrimental, the Director will notify the Controller to withhold from future allocations to the county the difference be- tween the proposed reduction and what would be- a proportionate reduction. • The modified Beilenson Act will apply for 1978-79 only; 15 days ' notice and 15 days after hearing before cuts can be made (rather than 90 and 60 days, respectively) . IV. Waiver of the requirement that counties provide a 10 percent match for the cost of the mental health, alcohol and drug abuse programs for 1978-79 only. 6 - 00099 ALLOCATION OF $125 MILLION STATE ASSISTANCE TO SPECIAL DISTRICTS All special district allocations, with the exception of allocations to multi-county districts and subsidiary (city) districts, will be distributed to the County Board of Supervisors for allocation to the special districts within the county. Each county will recieve an apportionment on the basis of that county's special districts' property tax loss in relation to statewide special district property tax loss. The county will have complete discretion in allocating the assistance with the exception of the following guidelines: -- In distributing funds to districts which provide fire pro- tection services, police protection districts, and community service districts and county service areas which exclusively provide police protection services, the Board shall provide an amount sufficient to ensure that eachdistrictmaintains the same level of protection as was actually provided during 1977-78. -- Districts with unobligated. reserves of five percent or less or their total 1977-78 revenues shall be given priority over districts with surplus funds in excess of five percent. -- Districts which have relied most heavily upon revenues derived from property taxation to finance the provision of a service shall be given priority over those districts which are less dependent upon revenues derived from. property taxation. -- Districts which are not authorized to utilize non-property tax revenue sources, including but not limited to fees, rates and tolls to finance the provision of a service shall be given priority .over districts which are authorized to utilize such non-property tax sources . Allocations to multi-county districts will be made directly to those districts. Allocation to city subsidiary districts will be made to the city council which is the governing body of such districts . The distribution made to any special district shall be reduced by one-third of the district's surplus revenues or re- serves which are in excess of five percent of the district 's total 1977-78 revenues . .- 7 - 00100 ALLOCATION OF AN ADDITIONAL $2.2 BILLION FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, COUNTY OFFICES OF EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY COLLEGES Approximate Additional Percent . Guarantee Level State. Aid of 1978-79 K-12 $2.067 billion 90% County Offices 65 million 90% Adjustments Less 33 1/3% of reserves in excess of 5% of 77-78 State and local revenues (13 million county) - 66 million Less 10% pro rata reduction categoricals : 1978-79 base - 53 million Driver Training Fund Reversion - 6 million -$2.007 billion Community Colleges 300 million 85% Less 33 1/3$ of reserves in excess of 5% of 77-78 State and local revenues - .40 million Subtotal 260 million TOTAL $2.267 billion 00101 8 - Public Schools Guarantee: An additional sum of $2 billion in State aid will be allocated to the public schools in 1978-79 to guarantee, on a statewide basis, 90 percent of estimated 1978-79 budgets . The guarantee will vary on a district-by-district basis according to a sliding scale wherein low spending districts will be guaranteed 91 percent of their 1978-79 budgets and high spending districts will be guaranteed a maximum of 85 percent of their budgets. Low spending districts will be required to effect a 9 percent budget reduction compared to a 15 percent reduction for high spending districts. Revenue Base Used to Calculate Guarantee: The district revenue base used to perform the above calculation will be the sum of the following: 1. Projected 1978-79 total revenue limit per AB 65. 2. Sum of permissive tax rates actually levied in 1977-78 against district's 1977-78 assessed valuation. 3. Sum of ADA credited to the district in 1977-78 for summer school and for adult education. Direct State aid for summer school ADA and adult ADA will be eliminated for 1978-79 . _ Block Grant: For the 1978-79 fiscal year only, the $2 billion of State aid will be apportioned in the form of a block grant in order 00102 - 9 - assure districts maximum flexibility in allocating limited resources to safeguard essential instructional services . While summer school and adult ADA is considered in the districts ' total base for purposes ofc c-.)mputing the districts ' guarantee, it will be left to local districts to decide if such funds should be reallocated to other educational programs of higher priority. Categorical Aids For the 1978-79 fiscal year the following categorical aid pro- grams will be reduced by $53 million or by 10 percent, which is identical to the average percentage reduction for the general school program. Categorical Aid Funds K-12. (In millions) Program 78/79 School Improvement Program $137 Educationally ,Disadvantaged Youth 126 Compensatory Education 4 Special -Elementary School Reading Instruction 16 Bilingual-Bilcultural Education 14 American Indian Education 1 Instructional Materials 31 Child Nutrition 39 Mentally Gifted Apportionments 15 Regular Transportation Apportiommnets 68 Driver Training Apportionmentsl/ 23 Urban Impact Aid Program 49 School Personnel Staff Development 1 Assistance to Public Libraries 5 $529 l/ Balance in Driver Training Penalty Assessment Fund not required to finance driver training apportionments will be reverted to General Fund M million) . - 10 - 00103 County Offices of Education County Offices of Education will be allocated an additional $65 million in 1978-79 to guarantee them 90 percent of their estimated budgets for 1978-79. A 90 percent guarantee is provided for this segment because county offices of education provide direct instructional services for special education programs and vocational education, and for a variety of direct administrative services for school districts. Community Colleges Community Colleges will be allocated an additional $240 million to guarantee them 85 percent of their 1978-79 budgets. State aid will be allocated as a block grant in 1978-79. Reserves The public schools, county offices and community colleges will be required to allocate one-third of unrestricted reserves and certain restricted reserves available as of June 1, 1978, in excess of 5 percent of their 1977-78 budget or $50,000 whichever is greater. 00-104 - 11 - L STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE PAY PROVISIONS No state funds from the state surplus or state loan funds will be available to any local public agency which provides a cost of living salary increase in the 1978-79 fiscal year for local public agency employees or cost of living increases for any other individuals, including AFDC and other welfare recipients , if such increase is in excess of the cost-of-living salary increase provided for state employees . The cost-of-living salary increase provided for state employees shall be determined by dividing the total amount made available by the Legislature for salary increases to state employees by the total salaries paid to state employees . If the Legislature limits the cost-of-living salary increase for state employees on the basis of salary range, the local public agency shall likewise limit any cost-of-living increase for local public agency employees and other individuals on the same basis. This provision does not preclude regular merit increases , promotions, or transfers, but does preclude the transfer of employees to new positions created with higher pay schedules for the purpose of circumventing this act. Any contract between a local public agency and an employee organization which provides for a cost-of-living salary increase to local public agency employees in excess of such increase provided for state employees is null and void under the police powers of the state, and such contract is hereby declared to be reopened and subject to new negotiations. The act constitutes a matter of statewide concern, and shall apply to charter counties and charter cities . The provisions of this act shall supersede any inconsistent provisions in the charter of any county or city. - 12 - 00105 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA - Re: Establish Survey Monument ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 029 Preservation Fund, & Impose ) (Gov.C. §§25784 & 27585) Added Recording Fees therefor . ) JUNE 27, 1978 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Government Code Section 27584 authorizes this Board to establish a Survey Monument Preservation Fund to pay necessary expenses incurred or authorized by the County Surveyor in any retracement or re-monument survey of major historical land division lines upon which later surveys ' . are based. Government Code §27585 authorizes' this Board to impose a user fee, not to exceed $10, to be charged and collected by the County Recorder over and above any other fees required by law, as a condition precedent to the filing or recording of any grant deed conveying real property except lots created by recorded final maps. Operative on July 1,, 1978, this Board hereby ESTABLISHES a Survey Monument Preservation Fund for the purposes set forth above, and IMPOSES a User Fee o $10, to be charged and collected by the County. Recorder over an ove any other fees required by law, as a condition precedent to the filing or recording of any grant deed (see below) . Grant deeds subject to the fee include, but are not limited to, deeds describing parcels or lots created by records of survey, parcels or lots created by official maps, parcels or lots created by parcel maps, parcels or lots created by government surveys, and parcels or lots created by metes and bounds or acreage descriptions (except those metes and bounds descriptions describing an entire lot or lots created by a recorded final map) . Excluded from payment of this fee are trust deeds, grant deeds conveying easements or oil or mineral rights only, grant ,deeds to or from government entities or agencies or officers thereof acting in their official capacities, grant deeds recorded. or re-recorded solely for the purpose of correcting an error in..a--�3'ediously recorded docu- ment, and grant deeds which describe the property conveyed as an en- tire lot or lots created by a recorded final map or maps. No such fee shall be charged for any document with which there is presented a declaration signed by any one of the grantors named therein stating under penalty of perjury that the property being conveyed by such deeds) consists of an entire lot or lots created by recorded final map or maps and setting forth the date(s) , book (s) , and page(s) of such recordation(s) -1- RESOLUTION NO. 78/L2? - 00106 The County Recorder shall forward all fees collected each month pursuant to this resolution to the County Treasurer for deposit in the County Survey Monument Preservation Fund. The failure of the County Recorder to collect any fee required by this resolution at the time of recordation of a document shali not affect the validity of such recordation -and shall not prevent the County from subsequently collecting the fee. The Clerk of the Board shall transmit certified copies of this resolution to the Recorder, Treasurer, County. Survevor (Public works Director) , and Auditor.-Controller. PASSED on June 27, 1978 unanimously by the Supervisors present. - cc: County Administrator County Clerk-Recorder County Treasurer-Tax Collector Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller PJL:s -2- RESOLUTION NO_ 78/ 629 00107 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t In the Matter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map of ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/630 Subdivision MS 142-76, ) Orinda Area. ) The following`.document was presented for Board- approval this date: The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 142-76, property located in the Orinda area, said map having been certified by the 'proper officials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalfofthe public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978_ Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director - LD Director of Planning ' J. H. Bronson' 42921 Corte Caracas Fremont, CA 94538 0.- Bentley 2122 Shattuck Ave. Berkeley, CA 94704 RESOLUTION NO. 78/630,- 00108 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA . In the Matter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map and ) RESOLUTION NO. .78/631 Subdivision Agreement, ) Subdivision MS 121-77, ) Lafayette Area. ) The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 121-77 property located in the Lafayette area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; - A Subdivision Agreement with Charles Jon RolgffSubdivider, wherein said Subdivider agrees to complete all. improvements. as required in said Subdivision Agreement within one year from the date of said Agreement; Said documents were accompanied by the following: Security to .guarantee the completion of road and- street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code., as follows: a. Surety Bond No. 9190035 issued by Fidelity and Deposit Company_ of Maryland with Charles Roloff�Aas principal, •inthe- amount of $9,750` for Faithful Performance and $5,350 for labor and materials; b. . Cash deposit Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail. No. 07696, March 27, 1978, in the, amount of $1,000, depositedby: Marjory Roloff. NOW THEREFORE 'BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTF=, RESOLVED that said Subdivision Agreement is also APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: IPWD (LD) .;Director of Planning 'Charles Jon Roloff 2722 Kenny Drive Walnut Creek, CA 94595 00 RESOLUTION N0. 78"631 G RECEIVED jUtla?l19�8 J. R. OLSSON SUBD=M1 AGFEMENr CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS c NT COST c (Govenwent Code §§66462 and §§66463) [ 1] Subdivision: MS 121-77 [91] Effective Date: June 27, 1978 Charles Jon Roloff [§1] Subdivider: Kathryn Doreen R o l o f f [§1] Completion Period: 1 year Marjory J . Roloff 1.. PARTIES & DATE. Effective on the above date, the County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the above-named Subdivider, mutually premise . i . and agree as follows, concerning this subdivision: ; 2. Il'-1PR9VEhff24TS. Subdivider agrees to install certain road improvements (both public and private) , drainage improvements, signs, street lights, fire hydrants, landscaping, and such other improvements (including appurtenant equipment) as required in the improvement plans for this subdivision as reviewed and on file with the Contra Costa County Public Works Department and in conformance with the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code (including future amendments thereto) . Subdivider shall co plete said work and improvements [hereinafter called "work"] within the above ccpletion period fran date hereof as required by the ! California Subdivision Map Act [C-vv m arjt Code §§66410 and following] , in a good workmanlike manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirenents of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plans and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. GLUUUUME AMID ItUMANTY OF TURK. Subdivider guarantees that said work shall be free from defects in material or workmanship and shall perform satisfactorily for a period of one (1) year frau and after the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as complete in accordance with Article 96-4.6, "Acceptance", of the Ordinance Code. Sub- divider agrees to correct, repair, or replace, at his expense, any defects in said work. The guarantee period does not apply to road improvements for private roads, which are not to be accepted into the County road system. 3A. PIANT ESLABLISHM?r WORK Subdivider agrees to perform plant establishment work for landscaping installed under this agreement. Said plant establishment work shall consist of adequately watering plants, replacing unsuitable plants, doing weed, rodent and other pest control and other work determined by the Public Works Departmrent to be necessary to insure establishment of the plants. Said plant establishment work shall be performed for a period of one (1) year from and after the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as oorplete. 4. IMPROVE= SDCURI'I'Y: Upas executing this agreement, the Subdivider shall, pursuant to Government: Code §566499, and the County Ordinance Code, provide as security to the County: A. For Performance and Guarantee: $ 1000."sh, plus additional security, in the amm tt*�,, wftch together total one hundred percent (100%) of the `stimated tthe work. Such additional security is presented in the form of: Cash, certified check, or cashier's check Acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the Subdivider guarantees �erfornan under this agreement. 5, 2S-o � B. For Pa t: Security in the amount of $tj:;$ ., which is fifty percent (50%) of the estimated cost of the work. Such security is presented in the form of: Cash, certified check, or cashier's check R acceptable corporate surety bond Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this security, the Subdivider guarantees payment to the contractor, to his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or nmiishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. C. Upon acceptance of the work as caplete by the Board of Supervisors and upon request of the Subdi Aller, the ammmnt of the securities may be reduced in accordance with Sections 94-4.406 and 94-4.408 of the Ordinance Code. Microfilmed with board order 00110 f 1 -2- 5. L!NLPFV h= PLAN WARRANTY Subdivider warrants the improvement plans for the work are adequate to accomplish the work as premised in Section 2 and as required by the Conditions of Approval for the Subdivision. If, at any time before the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as complete or during the one year guarantee period, said improvement plans prove to be inadequate in any respect, Subdivider shall make whatever changes are necessary to accomplish the.work as promised. 6. NO MIV"'R BY COMM._ Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of t work and/or materials or statement by any officer, agent or .employee of the County indicating the work or any part thereof cemplies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider of his obligation to fulfill this agreement as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped fran bringing any action for damages arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. INDEMITY. Subdivider shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the indennitees from theliab eses as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards; owrtissions, officers, agents and employees B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, party damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforseeable at any tine before the County reviewed said approve ent plans or accepted, the work as complete, and including the defense of any suit (s) , action (s) or other proceeding (s) concerning said liabilities and claims. C. The actions causing liability are any act or emission (negligent. or non-negligent) in connection with the netters covered by this Agreement and attributable , to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of then. D. Non-conditions: The promise and agreement in this section are not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or reviewed any plan (s) or specification (s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering, any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful mis=duct of any Indemnitee. S. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work:, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. RMVL'YS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey nmunents in accordance with the filer d .map and to the satisfaction of the County Road Cotmiissioner-Surveyor before acceptance of any work as Mete by the Board of Supervisors. 10. NONPERFOYVANCE AM COSTS. If Subdivider fails to ccnplete the work within the titre speck l`( d in this agrearent, and subsequent extensions, or fails to maintain the work, the County may proms to complete and/or maintain the work by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider agrees to pay all costs and charges incurred by the County (including, but not limited to: engineering, inspection, surveys, contract, overhead, etc.) iTnTmediately upon demand. Once action is taken by County to complete or maintain the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all costs incurred by the County, even if Subdivider subsequently completes the work. Should County sue to compel performance under this Agreement or to recover costs incurred in completing or maintaining the work, Subdivider agrees to pay all attorney's fees, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith, even if Subdivider subsequently proceeds to complete the work. 11. ASSlGbZL '. If, before the Board of Supervisors accepts the work as complete, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit, bond, or letter of credit securing said rights. 00111 4 -3- 12. AS-BUILT PIANS. Before acceptance of the improvements by the Board of Supervisors, the Subdivider (or his Engineer) shall furnish.the Department of Public Tebrks a complete set of acceptable 35MM microfilm copies of the original tracings of improvement plans for the subdivision (including all revisions thereto) . 13. RECORD MAP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider to file and record the Final. Map or Parcel. Map for said Subdivision. CERA COSTA COUNTY S'tJ�IVIDER: (see note below) Vernon L. Cline, Public Tebrks Director •(J1L A/t EW-42:4Z I .'L BY Deputy / u! PECCMMENED FOR APPROVAL: Note to Subdivi(?er: Execute ackncwledgment form below; and if a corporation, affix to seal. BY: I " • (CORPOR M SEAL) FORM APPROVED: JOM B. CIAUSEZI, County Counsel. State of California ) (Ackncwledgerent by Corporation, . / Partnership, or Individual) County of I ( )ss On C . i the person (s) whose nine (s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is/are known to me to be the individual (s) and'offa.cer (s) or partner (s) as stated above who signed this instrument, personally appeared before me and acknowledged to rre that he executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. MOM= SEAL) OFFICIAL.SEAL SYi VIA A. LAKEMAN o N:T.AW PUBLIC -CALiroRNIA C':.IITV C--,'-:TA COUNTY / cmcm. rx irs ;vS 22. 1379 Notary Publicor said County and State (Subdiv. Agzmt. CCC Std. Form) LD 9 (rev. 5/8/78) . 00112 .. ... . , " , - - -- -.,,-i - .-.�- � ..-.�.....,---. .....:�-," , f,��!- - . i ,�l., l� .....-..-..!. - -..., '. .... :. ..�..,,.�..^.�,- V" ... �-,...-A.-..,.i.,--.-..-��.,..��,. -. - , �1 ,- .� .---�' .. , . % ... . � ... . - % z , ,. . .. I .. . .- . .- , "-j : .. - -, I - - .- ... -- -1, , '� ..�'.r.... . 7.-.,-"-.'-,;'.I���--.,-r-,�'--.,;�-. . . .. . - - , �]I�!.`. -.`��. .�... . ,;. . . ,... �; .- - ..� - �s..I.�,... -, ,... .. " .. : . . .. .:..... - . . 'J��,�.,�,...;�."'?'1&.N--14'-- --�d. -.-.-..,.- .'. ,..--.. �i .. . . .��Z�.,:1 .1. .. N - ... ... . .... . . . ,: .r - :;;�, .7 , ... . . .. . . .. .. , .. �, _:... .. ...%-.1.... .. . . . - ...� ... ..� I . , . -i.- . : .�..:. . r - . .: .... �-: . . . . - :. .1.�.,�.:� . I �.... ., . .�.1.!. .. .-�m.:_,:: .,;,�..:.�,.�..�.�. , �-_:`,�?,":: .. ... . . . . I" , . : , � ....., ... . I I . . . .. . - "" �- �,..:,.:. . .�,..�.!. .. .�. .... . .. . � �.. . �. ..... . -.. . . , � -.. .:'. � , " ,, ,, :,�.:. .. . . . . ..� ......!, .��:-::�...:...,-.-. :.�,,�;!�., . -;:.- . - . : �..;- � . ...-. . .: ':% �-. !.�.�;;i., .. .D :.�.... .. .:, . .. ... . , � , , � , - ... � -...- - -. . .. ... . . -, ..............�'.. 7 7�:...... . ..., ! . . �... , . -- %... ,� . - - � . . . - 1�" .-."., ,- ,.... �, .-v.... . :.r......... . :r -: - ,- ..z ...... :"2.,i -A, 5� q- -Z� ,;.r..7, ..4 �. ;,.�r..�...1 e;: - ..1.� . %7 . .. � - . . ..� , .:. . -, " -,-, -'. '� -"."-- .- 10 .. . . .. . ", ;�, . . . - ,i�. , , . ., .. Bd]q .. .1 ' U!! 7,-�, �?�,--.--.; �,, . .. ..,�.. . . . I .. i " ` :-r-� . o V - a . �� �- ` ,. .... - ,..� - : - . .. , ,.1. . . . - - .: .. . ..i . . �, - - . . ,.1 . � .. . f � -.:�!.��: .. . ., . . .... .�: . . .a., .. -. : ... .. .�;... ...:�: . . .: --.-��.-'.�%'%.�. . :. .. EIVZ --���i;. , . . . . - . . . :;,.-,':---.�,, ". ... ., . . :.: . . ... .--' . - , . - :7::,-,- -.---. - . '...... . � .. .... -,.1...,.",' - . . . ... ..- .. .AF; . .. . .. . - " ... . -'...,: . L - -- ... . .. . :, � :1. . .- ? I., lm . - ., . "..... - , . '' .. � 1 . 01:0�:. . ... .. . ... -�.�-,--,,r"; ..:. ... . .. ..1. .... - ,j�-M;,-;';KR.�..;A : ... . ., . � ..�......,..." - .. . ... .. . , . .. .. . - - . - . . . .:I..;..�'�j;z�...�, �.as. ... - "-� ,.L . ... . . I .., , - . . .. . . "'-,'v' �.: ---, . . .-... . . .: .. : . : -;'.-rj;--,--,-..-.�,--.�-,1 '.-.�'--.:.� . . , ,.- .: ....; . . -e - . .� ..- .... ., :.. �. .. . . . . - . ... .,,�..�::.!� . .. ....... ...... . . - . '. . " s- , ,::#� -..tri[r�: 1�; . .:."�:.,:: ". :.:: ..... ....., ..: . ` - ... . ::° . . . . - A , , � ... %, . .- . �: .%.. � .. - . 5 .11 ) ..�. ....Z.... ... ... ... 0... .� ..,.: . . � .. '61: "', i-�i- .�-:!s;j.jp .. .�. .., . . ..... . . . -�2 ---.-.-".-.-z� -1�:i:�:.- -, 8 i�i W f?I-f I!,,".-, :.... �`., .. ; . .. ,. : . .. ,� -n��.�- ., . A- . 2 . " - v. ..--:. . .. -- � - - ... -: :�.,:.� ... .- ,,:.-.t• . - � , . . " . - . . - - .. . .. ..::.. :,....,::,,.:.:-,r:. -. ...-.. . :�, -. ....V. -.,.' . -7,--, --.",'s,-,� - - ,.;� '..".. . .. - -.::: .I . - � - ...... r--. . ......�....... .. ,', . -F . . '. . . . � . .�.; ... ., , . -:.:7: ..� - ..-.."..-1.'.. ,...,.�. .",i . .;.. ": ; , . 7� . 5. ...'.. <.'�. .. - ... . -. . ' 9� � ... . ,. .:.�- . ........:.,....:�:-7 . . . - .. AF -, It ,. .. , U N .7��`-1§7 , .� ... . . . . - ..: ..�:..".-�.�. ..%? .., . - , ,.j- %:. . %%:. . ...- .sr.,� ... . .. . .; ... .. �,:..:�.� .... ...- ,�... : . . .i;:.-:1.1sr.:.�� .I... .•....,..� .. .... .. -.j ..,Z.. , .. .� . �. . , .. . . ........ :.,�r'2.. ..,; .. - '. . .... .- - . . .. . - , � '-.:, :.. .-.:.�. --, --. . .;,,.. �� . - %%%%% .. .: .. - .. . ....... , . , ��.. ;I... S-1 0 N.-'-;.,,z,A G . E M- �,NT, ." ...... I.: . .�. . . . ,!�..�; - 4--.'�.:. .... . .... . . . . '.. . -. . ., . ... .. - -, - . 7 - �.' ..� ..... -�- -, . . � ... � . R . �"".,-`�;' � , ... ;.;-6. - .... . . - , , -1 - .. . , . * � . '. -Z , ... . - - ...... .. .... N.4. '.�:..: . - . . .. I . . . . .. . . . . :" .. ..,.... .. .. `�-- r . ,-:- ��,.:-..!. . �..-:J. . .4 . .. . .�..- . . . .. I . ,`� . ., . . .. , ... . .. . .. - b ..... .- , a . . . . . A," . � . ! .. ---1�- '�,:.,7, ...,. , � . . ., .� . rdi.566� . . - �!�`,--�!.,-.--..` .1 , , , E .. , . ..4; .�:'..: . 7;-r" .. I , A i . ... .. .I . . .. � . . � .,. . . ARD.OF-SU.I , . .,,.�.".;.�' ; ..� ...... ..... .1.1. -...'L, �;. :...� . . - .- . -I- �.�=....... . ... ., . I .. . , . .. ... , . ... . :.. .- . ...:.. .........".:� .� .. �� .. . ., .. . � -Bo -t -.q.11 34 EPK jk , .�gW.'.. �: . . .. �- . .-a A ... 2, .-i .. . . ... . . .. .. -, .,�.-.o � a I.. . vl:.-.. ...... . ... . . : .. , I ,-�B'44'.- . .. .. . . �'A: . .. . .. . �1 . . -:,; ,:.�,... . I... .. ........t ., . .. .j. ...- . .. . '&e-' -.�:- '-I" .:,Rerl. - .:.. . - . .. . ..I "I" , - i .... .0,I,k r an L .,�, . .....� . "I, i "I p . . . . J:.,...., , � . I . . ..r.I'd-.--1-1-1 1-- • . .. . �� �tjj. ..........- .. . ...* , . . ..::..: . . � .. ::: . .. .... , � .. .. I: ... .. . , .. I .. 1. .1 .I.. t. .. , � ... .. - .. .. . ... . .. ...... � .. . ,��.,.,. ,..I ... -�, -.: . , %,. ....� , . ... . 1. , . -,,,, :.:...(.r,, .. . ► " ..'I�n in(W.- .- ;, ..V ..1. :, 1. - , .:, . ... ... � .� � 'A 1. .. � . : . . . ." , , -i I y)�:.. . . I .�,t'� r�5z�".: . 1....�.. - �, , ` . .:� " �,,�§ ,�6 ."k,"'. - .,(-.- X ... .. : ... .: z -� . I t. a . ,� �6 9 -2 ) 0 ,9., .C.� .. " .. ,� , ,2�r.l.,i'.,.*.,e. - I . I . .... .. . .. . . . .. ..:r .. . . . . .. 5.- ;- . . . ... . .�.:.:.... .� ..,::..,`, ..: . I . . . .. . . . & �� �-- . , " . - 7.. .......... . . . . , ... . . . . . . .., ..,...,.,% . .... .. :: ........� �.: . .. . .�.. . . . . ...�... - , : - ... : - . -. , , ,`� -, .:� ` I ...: .o .. ....-.....:....... , .::� .: -.-. -�...; t. .. '. , .! :. ;�, .�. 1�-:�.,� . - - m . ::.::; . . ....,. . . . .. - � .-�.�,.:- - -"�" . . . .. . , .. . . . . .: %.. . 'n. , ��ii&.MARJOR " : -T.-'�` .... - . .. ..�. . . . .. .. . r -!......�.._- ...;�:. .. . .-,�-F,-.�--,'..�,'�,�`-, ;.. .'. 691161QFt�::--� ,- ----,- ?�-.-`--- , : ; - -- OBLIGNI-11J0,14.*...'� ,x..�.... ".. - - �,., - - � , : , -.------ . : - , -- ;- - " .. .. .; ' - ... &�1' - .,.'- .� �.. '....... .".. -,�- .,.. .. ;... ... ... 7. .,..,.. . .. --.. . :..... .. . ....... ..... ' �i .: � , bbk[�Akli A" -,X. -4 .. 5S.1.:::,:.::;;,..,- ..j -,' ". - .. . -,. �. �rineinc i - TIDELITY WDiii6' --- - ....... . 111. I., . . . .j ri ... . S IT . ......RiNARA ND; .. . . - .. . ..; q1- � 6 . -.-..-.-. --- .1'...."... meq; . - "' . . . ....r..... .;....... . . Q - . . .. r, .� , 4 . . . , .: ". ,xz e-d--an �.` - .j. - Attiq . . .... " .. 0 .. . .. ... .. . ��7- ,.'. ..�-la , . .. - r 6 . �... .. . . I. ... . ... ..:..�. I ... .. .. �- .. ... ,.� ". �;...�,in-( e;r�,.,,ulb - - .JI .. . ..�:, .. rl�.`�:.�, • t 'I" " tfth.6�Aatu';e . .:. .1 e.i :. ..' . ., .. . t e �n". . .!- .:*.oz "i Or,�:`-'�i1,1.! . I ' ' I Y 3'.:,,.,,,,,,...,.y:,:;Lr- . .s.... .- , . . , . . . .q. �,,,.I , - , .- . ;.. , .. .. ... ..,;�` ., a----m--,, -- M:r - . t...�.11:, .. . .. .. ... . .: . ....Z. �....c�, - :..... " . � t.. ..: '. 1, .."�.�. .. nes: .... . 4' ' qq. " ' i 't'tit.t, . ".. _ 'It.1"...1*1 t''L, - - - .i- .. . V. - �s,tire. y-�: -,Uri - . : . ... . . 7- - . . t' .' b 'i ... ' ' -.•-.�.... .. ..?. . .. , . . . . .. -, - III W101'. " ;, . . .�- ..�'s � .. - .0 ,�'.. - . . . . : -�.,..��-; �A --- ..ah a ,::� . .. .;... .. . ac. .. -. aA � "�; .--.''�- . - . ...�....,q �. . .. .... '' - �:-: �MkRl ND:�.';'�.'��. i�..... .. ...I..-..:.;... .. - 0. .I 1.. Z. ....-- .., .- , " ,, �...j. .. . ; . ..; . . . ... ' ........... , ,...,.-.and s-.-.r,&:,ipdl-"�l.�l..��..�b,-i-iI 1-.jburse eb,- . oll. -A.' �'. . . .. I.... ,.i, r � . . .. C-i.:H.Tornia .........:.�,,u..17pi.,L�",7,,�,- liery ,-%,.:,-:!�:1 I I T � d" iv. . . - , . - .. ., -..:.. . �:.,.! : -Z . . .. ,..;. ;..:�-...� . , . ... - ., . , ..-,-� " 14.0....:.... .. . .,....0. .. ..- � a..,,...- ...�. ....-- .... ..... . I ... :k,,.;. . ,,..... ..�:.'zt:.. . . .. '..-". . 0. !the: . .. . .. ,,...•; " ' .rfs St . , .. .: , J �r . . .. .. ... . .K ... . 'i .. .-CoUn 1:" ..... ... - . is - *:.I. -. . . ..... . I .. . .. " '�". � �;.� ,...E.,'..,�., 0. . . q . i , , res, .4. t 1, !-or:-, * ,esO ...1�.,and-�,-. .,-.. -: . - ... . .1 I - execut � k, min . I .. 4� ,. ."43s;L- n. . . . .... W,. - ,.:...-.,2- �� . . . . . � .. _ .. :. ��.':. �Z, .:.!.�' �.....: I :.. . ..:�.... . .... .. .1- . : �I- ... I . . � ..:�.--'!!:�-;� . . . .. --e-1--Z., r . .i.� .. . " - ... . . - ...-:;. . ?.. I Z, ...... �:...� t .... � ... - .. . . "i .. I i.. . . .� ... '.". . . . . . .1. .. , , . .. ..1. . . I--o " t ..i I . I ..... I .. .0 .. C )'&A,�-.-;."�. uh AA%orni , ...o.,I .1 ,, ... �:. .. ...., .. ::. .!:, ..;..:...�. � .. � ....on ra c .. 1-1.1. - .� '� .-.:.:! -;,.---. .'.,D.- ;% - -."....7, . , - ,6�,�, .. I - .... ,..:- . ... .-,';;..�.... - - . .... . .�. ,:.:. � ....11 . ... . - ": �-�,-........:.... , ... . ...�, �..-- .. ', ,. 60146c - . . . . .. . , . . . . ,. T. ; m. .:.:atqcl:;.. . . . .. .-L ....... . .. INE ;9 .. '.' -1- .. . ; - I. .%ormancc.. •\i,r - .. , . .. .:,:,. : .. .. ••::. . .t,;.* t��).�,'.AN .-'�,'THO JAMDRED; . . . I . .. . . F I f"' I *1 vl�... .,USANDAtjh� .'- . ( -...I.- -gr-, � . t.r.'.) . .. . . i . .. . . � - .. . .., . . . - . N, - , , - ,.-% i o........t. ....: '. . :. .. ---N;,--�,,�, . .. max;::; ... .. .. �41. . .: - . . . . . .. :. .� � - . . - - . . . . . : . - , .1�: - --iOO ,, .%,�;) .for...7, . ... ... . . � .. -,. "Mi.s - -.�: . ....., .. . - . - - ... , ,.:-%� - .. , - , -:... -illus -?�f�.I'i.� . . . -- .. � ::. � . . ,1.,)*-..Irs.�,:�,(r$9%�.7,5.0"; ,,' .. . I .5 .:L:.. . r . .. :,:�!�--�....:�-��-, -:�.-:��. �!d�.;-11�;�. � . . 1i i,.;-�?. � . - - - .� ....�'. . . -.��.�,�.11�'V: . - , .. i',�;.. .. - - - ,-� ;-.I... ..;.. . .�, . 1.;"..�;�-- ;4�;-..� ..T..: �. ,;...-. . . ..� . . . ' . .......,., . .ii.;Zi4, % .,vi . '.I -.. - . " ..I .. �.:�Sub ci. :✓ 'K1.,bh:r;:ajr P. J - - �. .... .. . . :�. . .. - -- � - . .1 ' . -- -- � . . . S . . � . 1!.'�-�'�;�.'4.. ;. . . . . .•s1-,. .. F-, - --,-, , : . 1 .: " ( -'y Ltn- 'e)�.. the i --- ty S. , - .... . I .....,dl t 1, . J., .1. - q. ireipment -'-,- . :.: ..,-as . ..;.. .* ." . ,*:ti 774., .o`j........-..�;-�. ....�, ,-, 7 -:;. -- . , .-%,.,�: �:::HUNDRED . - - - .1 ii 0 � 100**..- , . .: ......�7 ... . ... . .: (I k..�J;.'-��,.-.p -.1evivt -T-HREE 'i.0.0.9P . '- .. . a - . . ... Me i j --TH0.TJSAfq]D., . ' .� I . .. .: - : :...: . .. . 1........-.... �.Ay .. . . . .. .. .."' .;iv, . . .. -- . �� U-:;U0vM;;,�:: v . , . : .. ... . . . ... :. ...:.;� ,.;- -�,�"I. .. . . .. ..; -r -:-: � -..�..-.., .- . . . . ,z j,. .... . ,v. S...'J.'%* 0.131 . . ,.-Ii.110.. . . . . � . . . . .. . , - ►.•. becu le.....W)p .;,.... �1. . - ,�'-:,- :,-:�� �..21...."---`�:.,`.�.��.-I .. -0.. ." I I T. . .. ; 4' . !� . : . . .. .: ... . . - ! , .�.... ..I....... , . .t. . - :. . . . . .. .,_.•-..; . . .. . .".i. � . . . 1 . z�- -.-I...'. , =� :.��: ...-.. .d. .. .,... ....i. ..-I,,". , , '. . . .. . ol �Z_,-��N;�M -�--�- .: .... - .- . . .. , .. .. . - .. %� . . i. . ..�.. )..'�..�.(. ...... . . ..... . . ... . . ..7-,!, - .. .,:.- -,-.::, - �, . LF ` �!�-!�"; .. . .� ,.::i,- , . . . . .. � ;� .��; . :.. , ....I ]� . .. . . o". jbillifte .. - . . .�. '.�.".,'-�� . . .... .. --..-.-. . . f 1)c�;krjjr,-:�.-Vl 3. .'.,e I I .t.--ovi.'. . . . .. . . ;..c X11"ri C 0� ,t 11, _ . .. * , r" '. - . . -I-.1... -.1 . . . _.....L".7: ,�� . . . :.. .-.;1 . . .I I .,.- ... i�;;� . , �!. . -4..., .,.;w�.?� . .. r•.. LV'. 1;': C j ... .. 3ee - .." ? . .... ...: iin.r. t,o ,w h k'.-- i " , . 11.� ...i. .If. ...... .. . .1. :Wi�� f �, i I �' ,_ . . - - .........-!.I . ....�..'. .. tate :. . .. . .. .- . . t . . .:.��---- ., . . . n.j .�'.t . il.::.CbdedV."4�-- *Fl0:..: tate... . ---.'...Z7 .:. . . ... . 1. n.. '. '.n 1:, ".. . S,"'" of .. ..,E � - -%% . . i 11"�' '. -�: � , -".. . . . . 1.- :. .. .. '..-... ,-,�.,.�!,�`...;..�`................ -;-: .: 'L�"::.-'�:,."!.�-,:;,..--:Z�� . .. . . ....- .. , . . . . ,�z.., . :.. . . : ..:. .. 'I ...� �Z!..��-It 0 �.' v 1 '&�'A'N;mi�;-,`.. * ,�, . 4" '21�. a,- Part"::, -.....%.!;..A-'.v1s 1 a . .� ,f.iv . . . - .. . :, ! � , . . -_ - - a ::�.�. . ...... .......;,4_3 . .. . . .. . . . , - , , '. :.;.. - . . - !n .. � I o ''�, .7,�- . - , !,! - .. .:...� -- " , '' -- .. . ...., . . ::: . . ... . . .. ... �'.�.�-, .. I . . , , . . . . : . :-, .. ..-� , :.�...-."::-. - - .. .... ... . ;,.... - - .�%...� -.... . .. .� - . - .. . . . . . .. . -;. ... . . . - ;--1 . , . . .T ':::'-',-: . . , ... . . ; - ,;--.�.,�P4 � . . I . . . . ... . .... � . . . . . e-3. . -:,:,. . . ..: .. . ii'.`--:--.��,.',If-.,��-.'--."L-. .. -,t- -�., !�.��..;,�.�.,- � .. . ... . . .. ;I.?,- .-;".::! .: .: . .:. :� . -. . , . - '. .... . -.1.....:..j...- . . . ...... . " I .�. ;- . .. ..e,,1.�, .m . .. .. . .. . , . .. .. . .: .. .. .. .- .. ...:..:.., : . : . M... .-,.,--,'-. - � !''�:. -,-..-,' , :. - . . . . . . : .. . .. . ... ... ..:... ... � -...... - . , . . . . - , . .: ,. . -�. . .. .. . i I•� . . .. : :! .r. . . . .... . .. . .. .. - , .. . . . . , . .. . .. . , .. . . :. . . w - V- i.. ...:. . ... ., . .1 . '. , .. ,. .. I . :A.. � . ... ...� . .; . . - . . . . . . .. ... . . ... .. .. . .... .. . .; 1;....; . . .. . - �.. . -. ... - '.. .........'. -". . . . . . .....!Izt ,1 . ..... .. . . ..... :�.....-...,........ . . 1%. , � . ... . . .. 'sk. ' , .... �.;-..'.;%7�?K.' . . . . ..... . ..pa% , :. . . .,:-;. -;�;�-...:,.tt4q .1 . �!. *1 :.Ami.i.,�r"vu-in ,. :-,..Th'e'Trdb T 'I.-- as:- executed'.. . ... "'. Al" , i's At - . . .. . .. ..;.- . . .1. :. .. .. 1.% .1. . ITA ,-';(' .,.. .I. Ic ,.cqn..-. . . �.�.: . - . .. .;"KE C .. cuted '' . . . . . . . - . . . : ...... ..,-n'q,.;.. * drainage-,. .." . . .- . ... .. ....�.. . I . .. .:, . . . . . . - - .....z. :....�, .. .- . ' . - ...........� ..�t .. .. : . - ..I... ,- . .. ;-,:-.,C -,,";t-r� �;.."' " , 1-..;i;triCi-,:.�:-.. ..--.,.-, . . . . . . .1. .I . ..it . . 4.; . - -1 P-=Z,--- -i .. , . . . . . . : .w.. a w.-:-a -.... .0 ..�'...":-S, .. "�'-.Pejr�nf7-vj Q.ii�'-...,VJbUht,r .t():� int;tal. -..:.and-,- 12.1 f , .. '� ; 'q-.. .1- Z . A . "s- - S .. .. .. ... . . ..... "r--i,;., ,�..I..'7...I .. . . ....4. ...... �� Y; .!��r"7.,!Z:;?,`.... .. , 6�L . ��".3t--�*� - ... . I . L.' � . , . , . ,7 ..'. .....2.7.j...I... ..- .. .... .. in::: _it :'. "I -:.� . _Spec - ,- .- -....�,'f -. ..i ... .. ... . .....;..,. -z4.2--s.. L, .:.. - -i,le, ... . __ .4. :....w. ..- .. �. 11 .-j.� . -11. .,; . .-:,-, .. - -,j--as., .. p. .. ,, i .. , "'' L. ::••'.'..::ice-:,..�'�- if &.: :.. -1 . (j% .1 . -;*:1-;ij,rl.,-,-�ljj)(ji'%, - 1.�, ►,�;It .... ,...,%-. -...... --��. . Im. .....-, 1 . !;.:j;�,,,t . . . - !. .lep..1 giprovemen , -; .. . ..-111'Z.'..`.- - - . �:',. .- .... .. .. '... .. �V."�.�,--i��-L�.';,-.r.'�L...:!,..L.. .... . I ..;:� ', -'. - - :. ...,...;....., . . "I t , . � I... ...- ,�,-,.... ', . .. .- , ... . . " -, •. . ... e. -a I .;�-.I;I."I;:t.liihz%.-t-li'L-.�'-.time Spec i j `'.;`--'.li,�;,-� .1 . :. .. .. .m. . . . . A � ..... - ..N ..�,Voj� - . w'. .��. . .. 1ejl - .;...�:: !*.()Jt!l;:, k.1... "::,!� --1. ,mic'; �i *, ..;..., .," ... 4, ... 'I'vi:310n -Al"Ma ie.tnJ*..,.::;1nc::4 .: . ....'. � . ....... .... . i�..�.A! .1.. .. ".t'i.'d j i. ,: 1., - - . . ' � � s.. . . . .... - � 4. �"'... .. ; .. .. ' - , � - ::� .`:'z-..,- - - . � '' . . . •..:'1..... ' i i,.- i,.,.171.��.. %. ... .. . . . !..�;E j - . . ' - ' th 0.;�:.,:.Z'0 I.. . ...Iticcon a n* c, ., - - ..St. . %�!:, .. . .... . .. � .. ' ' ' .� .-. - t'l -- 4. � . L . . ... . ,...,,... .. '. ..( 1.1:11� -,:it . . ,ZZ.:� i,*�i'z� .-- . . .. . . . ."'t...�. . . .. ' ' ..�t ' ,n - a, ,- -i--1 n,'-' . . . ;c ,.w I -I i;.. .... . . , ,�-.:;..�:, i-� . ..I ..Z.;;4 n i .!:�f!r�,.Cmc . . .. . "..- . , I . : . 1.Z. -,., , �, � . : ,. . ... . .. ,, , .... . . . t'i;.i•' lc:ol, ,�' .' . '. 3 z... . . . 4.. �...'Z. .%-. . f", , , .11TY.Let.to 1 I,��I-ki-!,-,.e.- d, � -j .:� -, ..I; . . ..%., . - , . . . N.. - - .� .�, "co - ..I L. - 'i ` , �, •.. . . .. . . ... .� ,�.,-",;,;,. .e ,.,.�..:.. . . - .z ... ..... t., .. r , - .ri �- , ,�. 0 . . .-.11l... .� .. ; - - .. � 17,nf, I -nk'k thr�:"Vlaljllfli 1, ,.C)i"d6,r...;��t:6',:-..-..*"�e "t- T - n( ' - :- w:.. .... ., -. ..�...... ... . `X5, ..V.:. 1 i-,,,, .on ; .. - - - -- I ?,!!: -iw b. " "' . .. . - ..1.� '.. -; ......... ....'.�- '.- .. . .. , . : ... I... ... ..I.. .. -..:. �:. . . ..%. ;. ... 1;.%... - . 1. . -:;' ...� .. .. . .1 716dal 1, .,�- - - I.-- . . . . . .. -1 . :'f;," . �;-.L:! ,,..w::. �;...�.'�.----'--..'� I; - , . . ......... aip;s:;-�?..,...:.-... . .. -. . . . .. ;i.41�&;..s . .e. '. .. . . , .. ..T." . . :.. I ...., - ..4 ,- . . for ..... * �' .- .... - Y Jl - bbfVihlon,.: . - .. - - . . -1 . : . . .. . 'V; -,�rlme - :ntC-. zs--J ap..' F- '11f- .aw-, :. , .�!;:;�.4Z.fv' . . . -Z..�Y. . . . . : ;!I .: . .v,.. .V. . f. I r ,: Vii'- t h e':-J!i , 1.41 . or. : . ..•.:.- . - . . " ..,; . ...:. :. . . . .,--,.,. .1. -. . ..�!; ..... . . .. . . " , -.... -. .. ,. I...; - -,- - ...-.L��.......�., �,�.;, . .... ...:�' .:, : .. , ... .. .. . .;.. L;; . .. . 7.7. . . .. . -, - - - .... _: . ... .. . .. - , -.:.-. , .. . . _,:.; . ... .. ; . '.... . .. .-:�-..,... ;; . .- q . ri .; . :.,.�:Z, M! * ... . : .1415- .. . . : . . . ., 17,,�7. ::- . - '. -:�O'Lj:. -:!, . . ... � ww . :�:- ., .s. :- . , :F.:�.,:!:-.:1.��v:� �-; ," _; ...... . . 1. - : ..,';.. ,.: . :.. .. ... .. . . ... . ...z. ....:,��Na'.ui.,.p�� - . . . - . , '. . .. . � .: .. .... - . . .. ., ,: ;.,!:,�!:��.. . . . . ... . . ., - .:., .. � ... ... . - . . - .. .I ,..... ..�. - .... . .-f,.: :.. ... . . . . :1 --e;1.�;�, . . : . .1 .:-.."... . . .. '. ; - ., , - , ... :..� ... . .. - .�� ,. .. . . .. , - , . . , . -- , .. 7, . .. . . . . . ; .. ... I......... ..... .... . . .... .1 I�'.. -, . .. ... ,, - ::. '.. - -:.;,;�.- . . . . .. ., ., , --': .L�. . 1 .i . ! �-"".Q . . . .... . ...�. 0 , , ... .. .. . .: s.'.. . ..i:.�.v.. . ;'. :-� . .. .. :. �31-�.:-`.-!7--C )fl��"�'.---.�-..:�."-:--.�..'-�.. .- � . ...... d�:. . . NVITIC .. . ,.. :. %. . . . . : . ..'..... .: . . . . ... :1 ".. . . . , . ..... - .. . ... I . ..... : :.. ..' :w: . ...I... . .. - I - ... . . " �. � . .. ..:. . - I . ... .-Zz... . . . . . ..... I... . .. . �. .. .:. . .. ,....�,:_....-,... . .. . .:.. ::. .. .;'. ,....,-...: ... . ... . . . . . . .. .. . ... . . . .... . ... . I . .. . . . . . . . . . �- . , ... . . . . % -1 ' t Sect . -. '(A-Y�ahoy .1. ... . .. . .. . ..I .. � ... . . . 1." 6fidltl .. . ". .1 11z - fjbl i:-1� . .. 1: . . .. . :i .- . I , . .:. . - . ,I h L-- .... - -)gationl'as.�.�-..O:.. lor .. � .. . . .. . . . A --., . .. Ol I. :-i�* . 1. - ,��gat,ion . .. ..: .-.1.. '. .., .. ".... . ,.. . - ,�. . .: .: - . . .m . ...%...-;-I. .... . - - - :",. .. . . . I ";�-!` ,.-,..-.,- i.. itS. �.,�.. : ,ri .:-:.i:.�. .. . .. . ->.. ...i- . . . ..: . . ..s ... ; -... .. .. . .. . - 0 2 C1171al".,.f, .. ,r6, e . .. � ......!� % . . 1", '-sudii. -that J.T`t' -6 0 J. jj ... : -..;.. ..I......I . . .. � f �,-.'O'j ';::'-,a )'ove..b . .. ,:-J - Or 41� . , .�'ei .. I ...:, xec6t6��; .: . .. . , . . .. . , .:. . �. ,��i�f ... '.. . .. .- ....I , . . ....'.�-.:. ;- -K. " �.. ..:..:..;.....! .. ... . . ..- :.. . .. �..: .... .. . . . .. . ... . . .. ... . .. .. . .. . - , ... :'..:::..; .. . . - ' . . . . . -1 'a -and.:.:: -:'.. ..., . . . . . ..; 1011'.... L - anc : - -..' . - . , ..;.S. . ... .. , .-:� . .:. .... .'' 6 I. . shall- i A�hings,--st " I :t .. .. - . , ....�;r,� . . . ..;- : � ..'.. . . ..a . ,; ''succ.e.szors ()v: '.i �-A. r -. .3 . .: ,' , . i I ints'trator.. . , . . . . .. .... '... .. 3 . .... , , .�-..; I "- --X1 . .p-vt I . - I� �i 1, . , .. .. %.; � .. %...: . '...t � . . -* -::,trul.v , *. I , : pe r t , . .�. .. . .1 . . .;-.-. ; . .. . . .1rid- -w e 11, --.',,an d .-. ! , . .,-,the.- ovenan . . . . ... .... ... : . .. .. . ablde . . .. :;.,. .; . - .I , Driii.�o t��6...�.6, .. t-s'j.7,.ran(, I *. ons . :�by, . . 1. - .. . ..: ... . . . . . . .. " . -�.-:� . .•. . . . . .1 ,::..1,1.0. . . . - . . . .; . .. - .- . . ...,....... .. . -: . . . .. . . .6 ..:. .. ..... 1, . . . , :..-the. :said an 'any.,..;a, - era , .. .�.. .. ., - . .. . ...; .... Wid.-provisior;; L n-," :.- :1.1l-l*vo�Vlr;:ll1.: . , d, , : V . . . 6n...Oi6 reb 17.-.10adc au ..... ::!.. . , : . ... .... . .... � . . " .;. .. . .. .I .. . ...... . .�. . .., .: .. - . . . . . -�, - .. . ... . . - ; ':7 . r . I. . . .. i , �s' . .::. . . . . . , . .. 11 . . . , - ,, , I kit,-.-.l-.jj0. ,-.:. .;: . . I ,`- .-i .1.*.n...i•..... ., i i-! I . . ..... ... .. I . . .� Wit .1 ... 1-... . ... .. ..:. r=Lr!critln .nro - or . . ; - at•.�. - - - � . :. . . . -�.!..1 to: he ..C1Jv1-;.1 . .% :rl.ovlw�t . , t 1 � :rein vi. '.... -,,..,--;on�:�-.li s . . . .-! .. - -1.. ..'.;a :. - - . .. . . , .. ...;'. ...t...:.. ... . . . .� . ': .. ' ; .' .. ...%....r.? . .1 :n,�;a : --. i 0-spec .- - .. these, ?.•. . . I ... . ,, in-.•al, di ...... ......... t ''! , and ** t I 1': - :mdriner ere, - .i--pt�t t•t. . . . . "" -. 'I 1 .s. :a a j -16:: a . . . .-I....� ` .: I.I.:.-,�� . - i ' 1 - .. . a or ill! . . . .. .7j -�� . - - -i.--1,'ed :, and. I � L , .. - , � In . ,-,--, - . .2 I.-i, . . .. . S! . . .. . , .. . j " ., 4 , ,..� .... . .... .. . . 7 it:..'�m::--. .--- . , . - . . .i .:and. .s-*Ivc.. vi)�m. ... ... ..q . .... .. .,.v . . . all.: shal ... !;.:*- : �-.. '...... r. . . .7�.. . . . .. ,.�4:- . . . . , "' , ��nddiiinlhi fi .: to ..their true i ten and me alvi ?.w-� ... . . . .. . .1.. .1. .. . w ''; ... " , q- '. . . - . . .:., . � . . . .. .t. .. i . .. .. . . .. ,:- ... . .1. . . . . - I . . . . .; . .,:.." . . %: .... . , . :.. t arcen irvo:art ..,...;. ..... ...,,, . - . %_i . cers,i '. .., . . .. . . � . . -:- O .., .. , . . . . ea I . . .. i:�`SZ. f.:ri . . . . . . .. . . . . . -:. . ,.]....:,.. .. . . . ,, , ; , , �.: . 'i-..'.- . t;'., I Cbx n t y 61' ,.:.'.i!nt�f'b�..'.,"�.Co.r,.t.a' ;o v t,V� -:1: .� - ..3ifrnee)���-: , . . . . .. , - . . . .. ... ... . �- " , . . .. ..........;�.. ,V . - ` , . . . I It i i .:t'll I ' b-11LtIbil.-ZlIkIll IPCOH 1111, I:I-.- � ", �7 . . .. -i:4,:�f.1',:1k. n! �.� , , , . . - -toyer::, a-- !0r, .. .st.111tl:1:,.1:(,; . . :Wl � 3.5 -.0 ; rr,c . . -1 . . ... . ... . riei!i � v-:--,,:. e-,� iii . t 16 , .. . . . ..vA . . - . , %A. . ... . . 3 . .. ' �, -- :..I... .. . .. .... �.. --.,.. - ....." -."----.-�;�-- . . . . . �.,.,.e .- - ---��i .�. .: .. - . , ;,r ' i -� . . . .. .. . . - - ` ': -;tr!•' t -mat Aii-'&kf . -t - - �-- r-�: .::��%� I - . . ". - -.1 . .a re e::an J.. e ffe v .� ... . . iitd: Vditl- a tA 1,-i.,.,.. ee. - ....shaJ !. - . ..ji. . . . n ., ....... .... Fz-..�. .. . .. . . . - % . . I. - . s . . I . ... .� -1.....:. -- '' . . . . . . .� . : . . ... I . . . . . .. .= ..'.�j;.- - . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . � . . . . . . ..�..� . ... .: .. . .:�g . .. . ; . . - ... . ... . . . . . ... . . ... .,?.� .1 .. . .. . -�::,,j -��... - . - . .- - ... .. .. - .. . . . . ... . . - .. ..... .. . . ., .�.., I.b . .. .. . .... .. . . . . , - ... .. . . . . . . ',v... . ... .., . ..'I .... .. . - . . . .., ': .I........ . . ... . . -k .L.. �.. , , !.� .- ....�.,,,:.....�:';�-,i...Z-,:..,..,..�-- ..:. . I .. . addil; on . � �:. -4,il a. . . .. . . . .. ..I I -1 J I-al. 1.,.i I I .... .-iji e.-d. I.to re ' iin���. . �� P't . •:: :;, p4lj,i. ...-I. ." '; io,b I ... by :; J* t6 iici . :";.�.,.�,.��..,t,'...,.....,. . . . . .. -.,. " . . .. .... ....'...i. .. - . . ..... * ...- ':j .�- '. , .: .. . . . .1 ,.;��rk . ... . . .. . I . :.. . , .. . . .. .. 1. . .. . . .. . . . . .. -" ..�.:;-...7 %. . ts .an : .rea.,;nn, , i .-.,.-.,.. ..... .. . . . � u: - 11 . -ine I u"de , cos C1 - :.,.. . '.:'.;��.", . . . . . .. . . , . . ,.. . .. -. air . t ...;:i, :-.-�.i-T!.16, ,-,.� . , -j.. ther... sha't .., be , . . - - . !,!:., .the. L. tit 1 . d , - . . . .% ... . I . . .. . -...1. ,, .1, �;..I. . . .....,.... ..,.. ,� ...... � - - . . i" r 1- . . .. - . .c ,oun . .�.- ..:,..,.'1 .. .... - .. . .. .. e . . - -.", - ' . ' - incur�rirj ... �-. . � . . . . . ` -cuzona e ,.attorfity, .8 :fee � . ,..:.:..'1. ".�F� .10-vi 6: :e i p on s.e s and fees -��in c 1,i i vil i if� •; able:. . , . . .'.,.,,�R C :.. . .. . . ... :. .� . ,�r;..:-!..:.,� ......... .I .I .. . . . . - .1. : . . .. ..and: .. .I. . . .. . .. . . .. . . . . . ,Z "''..j ..�. . . . . . . ' ' �:, -": e..,!'�..": . .. . .V.. .. -iit- -.fully en'f-, ..;,, �;:ng..-such .-obl'ir.ation. !r.... ,:. .,� . ... . ('�1'. .....:,., - .. ..,. '.. . I :. I .. . . . . . .. bl- -�!ovn v , . .i.• I - ..'�i,vssi .n . . . . .1 .:- .' *. . - , . ,,... . . t .; fr C.f� ) I I,Ij: .ce:6.. . . 9 �C . .. . . .... .. . .:..�.,.;..:-! ... . . . . . 1 . . ... . . . ..1. . I.. ....-Pid.. ...'........ .... .... . . . . . . . .... . .....-�.:ts. '.-.-.� . . . . . . enderet - r - - - - ,,,, . . . . . . . . . - ar►ct -:I:Jtl:--ahy,:... .0 . . .. 1 :. . -: .... . . .1 1,11:1t)(1i weftt.:.1� i :,.......,�... -:.:-.'��..'!".- . ' . . I.- . - . . r . . .. . . * , ,. ..... . - . . . 11 11 .to: be t a::e,1,�41.4�,�.�`e, $ts.,-at it .. . '. J.... - . - � t . _ . acre=1 - " . ... .. -:.. ... ..'...,�: - . .1 : . . " . . . . ... . .. .. . .. . '. . :. �: ��..�;.;T,., . - .. . 7. .. ..... .. . . .., . -,.. . - . . . . . : . . " .. . � ,�.�7:,.;`Z!�:�.;.�.,.:. -.� ., . . ;. ..' . � . . . -'� . .. ... ... ... . ...:,-,.-,.�.,.-;�---`F. - . . . . . .. . . .. ..". � . -;1 . .. .. �. . . . . , - ': ;,i,....-....'-i-..- . .. . . 'i�in . . . . . - ... . .. �. A . ).: .at.. . . "..; '.. . , � ..... " ..� .. .. .. oil ,03 , ..'e.l. !71-1;;pZ ... )Or .'�'-.��... . . ' -d1tJq-rt: r--f'J1d`, . .." ': . . : - .4 .J�r.o 4. .. : "... &*fi � . I ... . . .:. .. .� -r.: ....... . . . .. .. . ... .. ...... . . .;",....;. . . - �,:: i�;,��--io:� sect-J.", l.: . . . ..� .i�..�:.,.;., , , -�.:-1)i16i,t161i..- . . ph .: . .? ,w, .- '. -�..Z��i..' ..."01�.:,.'... .,.:. . . .. ., ....... . . . . .. . . . ,,,.n.,.�.:,%�. . .... � . . . . . ... .. I.: .. . . . ii t , . .,.: ,.:, ... .... , . I -i th . ..... -... :,ririclpa. I -it " . 1. . . ... ,:- .: .. . . I..,': zuel at ii ii Wt'il j .41i'd` tbf!: . ridL-rb:itr.il�b.d':�'dt:'�.t�ddepoi,a e surety:* are , .. . ... . . . . ..":. .16". � .. - -1 ' . :�..!A. . .. C ..xgj:: .. '' .-. i ': , ..;�-.;..;�',I�:�R . - . .. : . .... .. :. ,'�.,-.�.,.�.'�k:�-...�....,.---;;.�t . ... . ... ..: �!...."".. .-I.i. ' ..- cb.n . - . .. .. . - . , , ' ' Goi tae,,;A -: ... t.ractOr I .. . ... . z , 7 � , . � ... y 1)�-I i I i i;-�,D�.; �•s�u�,�, an ;ill ., ;.. � : 11VICU. firful . . .. . . .. jn�t,d�. fie 1 . ... . . .. .I .on . , -... , - -.:.... .....'... ...'. . " ... . .,. ....... .0 . ...0.....�;,;*.��r,--- I .1 ,j Lt i I t.,,,r- n.f- L �� ... .. . . . . I.... ,.-.2,---'-,:;.et.-,': 7.:: " .. .. '. , .. .: ..- .., . -�;,�r .. .�.:.; ..... . . *. ;- . .. . • . . ,:�:..t:.�.�%, ..., 4. . . .. I.... . . , .1'.. � . .brer . -ons..; emp. . . . I ..- �. ... .. . .. . . 'Ab' ... i s;, .�, ... ' i.... ." . ..I .. .,�.. .- - - I.. -.�..-...-... �.IP- - ;. . . . . .. . tie �.:,Afi6e,,�6�4-. - aye 'i-liv tbe.:- ,7 . .a .. - - . . . r a c t a r.rt-j'-,-'.;4.1 "H-hll .ii:.and a ---,_ s .. . -". su Y�coni . . , 664;.6 I 11 -', . ... .. 119 ' . . ... . -11=--1-..; .2;,;.:j. '. _. ' L -" ' , - -- , - - .. . .... . . . . . � .1. . -.!I- .. ... .. - . .. ,. :.,.-.'.� ... ... � -..:n., : :r,. .. -, � - .. . ;"%:�-.t�' ' "' L-1- -.k ,;e.( :Z1, :,. :o"..-�.,1�!,4�',* .1 . . . . . - .�:. . i _,�� - t a - . . . �� '...�','a'.....'j., - . . . .:,.,.... .1 .,�.1) ...., '6i -'d - n... t�n 1...'�an. �:.�,x,e-1�gr ,ztp�..:Xm ie. -or .. , - -*`�'�' - . le-i.�Jr -ind�r.e :6r�,-.ij�id- !.-4,ct,fdjr.'es;a2t;--...-it.-,t-A!t;-�I _��r, d.� tf -.-A:f .esdiii"." ,.,--;,...-.',.., . . . . !� '. . '.I.n .-�'..,-"-,-.,-,1,",-, �..�.�.. ... �... . . .. �. .. . - . . . � 'Z'�!.% �;J� ';.' �";�... I , -5-,$L-- ,. !� ..Z' .. ...:.,. - . � . ."..1. ��;� ...., . .. . . -.... ... .....r,1t1yj, _,:''._L�.':�...:.'_ :..�:., .,;, ; ....f - .. . -I-, . mti;; - .-...- - Lr' �:�kir . - . #!��-,%!Z�..,r, r .4 ; i. - ..a , � I . . ';A; � �".� .... . .j�'LjjrjV_ . .- .1 ." ... . ..�., 1- ,v -" '1--;�-�.-;fiiii,�.i"�,,-.t-.�.-,.!.�-- '...14"I' ' -�-,z..V�; -;-��,,-,. ',-� . . . - i.-, ", ,��!."i .`� "I"", id-imbr.'.::L�f .. .. -t-VA-i'-',�Cod e:'z f br:�..-J% . ., , -i:i? -i6&,"; P .. I...�L-.! r �... ,,- � , .. . .5 , -:,__ 5 . . F t, .� - - .,�.:,.. ��.� _. _ - I I Met-..� . -4-.....1�.1 .. . .. .... ... .. - ..- ....... -".. � ".. -1...'.... I -. .... . . ... ...� -I ...'.11-1'-� � . - .r);..:"....'.. ... .- . ,",,, : .. . -- . - , . .. .. .'; ,- ; .',A . �- ,"R - : I ,�, � - ....- ,;�. P " ti�L., _ ,� __ e.�,�, , " , ���-.��.%"��i . . .... .. "i -sN6-.%, ,;,� --�-"kn�,�� -�r..!;:�.�-,:..--:�...�......�.._. .,. ............ ..... -,�'-'.-.,,--,,:,.:r,..",-.....'� , R. -� AWAO,.,Z�,..-t�. ,�,.... _ .: .;., - � ! , . . ...., . . . ": , "j�-. 11.T a . .., . , q.. !. - ;', ...... , . " .. .. �*?" , IN " �. .;I ;:. P ,. , ,;, 'L r. . , - - * , '' ': ,�',--;-?-, ---, . . i ... Ifil ....;., � . , . x. 1�� - � -, at f�im,:,-..�l;nl,i�;.�tL�,�-,�',�-;,�fel.�-11-.-.�251.,O m,r lki:,��o...,?-.4��',,...,t,-���.i,,r..e�,-.7',�',,.,,...'��,,�,-�- .. � i - , � - �:�'..'��'�' �.:�,,g., .!,;�W':"i�,�5;" 5.: ,,-�;�,L.v, P i - RIP. 11 11,11",,,,.I f1p .L - - I!!! 11�11'1, j'�Ef.��-,��4 --'�',�-, ,;":-:..-`�.!,i'" .e '-, V 1;111f, .., L-,� ,%;��:.. ',�.�. . " ,,�,:�;l I 'I . , 'I , �;,!;:` ,2L � ;�. .: , I r 4 I '� --, qf; -:�:�-.r-.,.K-,-it,. .-'.- �tfi.�. . 11, jg�2 ".: -��,Nvi 4'.g ,;N � t , ..L !v . ,..,,::-��-;�,-*::!�i,l:l.:!;Il�I I i!!�i 1. , , ,M'!iF,11; �1i'070 ,flF, ;p 4; �-.111.A I'll, : . Crq.,1 Mid- `PWITHICrrifflff - I , ��;R.� �-,4":1:1, - . .� 11 - ! � r, �Ar,; - " ... 190 "" ni I 1111HI'd III W.j Ff.[f.i IT � .. ... I 1 114 .`�. " . !, 15 ��, .1', ,; ��61;ieY, .".., W il 1� .1 *M�i . , IPMV.,�� R-1- F1 V ��l i I .,rr -..I - ;, �1�! .r W. :,ounts dur r. the Ung•:^I -:,I. Tn t•r•ance AcL. -11;11 >••c .r t".t t;r, .,uc it tf'r k ►.'r• l as t - that. zsal l ii11•• 1 1 1 P:r:1 the same .11'! ;in ilrmmint not: .` ct?` dini- 1:1:•• •F.mr)uiit• i-i,-,r^ ! :'•.t1•'t•.," n-A 1*orth, anr3 -also in canc ,;tlit is l•rouglit upoir !-his bond, :•:111 ► 1 in addition to trlc face amount I.hereof; cc,:•'.:t and reason.-:!, I,: r1•-es and Pecs -Including reasonable t` attorney' s ., InCurred t::. (or cit; =.;si ;nee) in successfully ► rifare'i.ns* stic•:- a'ri.l l.gat:i.on ! •• ! c1 :?r•. riled and :f.i:►.ed ley the coijrt , and ! c• b�� taxed . :::: roses and t .z ; :: t t7r• ►Ilheci in the .iuci ment. therein ren- •Iered. .1 t• is her-1 ex.r. res„ly :;!. i r,►I 1 and agreed that. this pond :,hall t 1ure' to thr !-met'it: of art: And t: 1.1 persons, coinnnnies and s:orhoraL•lonr c nti tied to F'I I.e .claims writ— '1 11. il•• l> (commencini- with Section 30821 • i' Part* It of I!i.vinion 3 of 1.hc (:i :-1 I Code , so as to r:'i.ve a right of :ct-tion to tI1-vi or their a:::• f:lr:: !r1 ;rny suit broul;hit IaTron this bond. Should tl•t, nondii;ion nt' I ',.Ibe fully Performed then this (•!}lil-atiati : II:i 1.1 become nt. i I ;,nd -:o!.d, otherwise :it shall be anti. remal n � •I full fora!! and, effect. G. I'Io alt-crat•Jr•:t •,[' :. 14 :,11iAlvision ag.r•eement or any plan ,• � or specification of said vjor•i: a;-rec.-1 to by the Yrincii-.14 . 'and the oirnty shall r•^J. eve anS' :'t,r ��t::: from liability on this bond ;. and con- nc•nt is here-by given.. to reals` ::t:• !1 alteration without. further notice to ►• consent l►�! `:uret �; anti Lits• ;'tlT•r�t: heret,y :daives the �rovisions of. ali.f.. Civil Cod '• :' ill), nod ho I►!:. itself* Lound without bout rbf�ard to anti 111denendently of any action Principal whenever taken. ;1 ::I.G!IEI) !IIID :;I:/iW;D on }."MIC.lPAI. SURETY By _- •� a J-o 1 f u i wi 1� ►'�� _ _Attorney-i -fact - is IFr. ., r, x $ ?E a. i; iE 9E if if $r dE $ * is :F 71 ?E '•!.a? e of CaJ i. 1--.,rnia: } (ACKI1t) Cv:unty o f Contra_ Costa 1LI*DGME.111' BY � I;lii:'i.'Y) { _ }•• Vn June 12, .1978 t',e rl•,tan f s) whose name(s) is/are signed *ibove for Siii-• : :;• and. Who � :=•' ern 1 r!�t:n to me to be Attorney(s)-in-Fact For this C:c►t'* -mate: yuret-y , i;c�r•::w;a 11 •:1 appeared .before me and acknowledged I t; me that he ' s r.ned th•: •tt' t.iin Corporation as Surety and his/ their oven a: its fit.I..•r rw- { } -in-Fact ( _ Frances G. Haslett Notary Public for County and State- . (liev. 2/76) LV-15 . 1-131f:bw Orrrl:rAt:sl:nr; 00114 FRANCES G. HASLETT -a s'•' Nd.•;ARY PU13LIC-CALIFORNIA ' PrIncipai.Off icr.in Contra Crista call4nly MY Commission Expires hily27:1980 . ...... .. .. .:....::.::.,---rte. Power of Attorney ++ FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE: BALTIMORE,MD. •1 KNow ALL MEN BY TIiESE PRESENTS:That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,a corpora- tion of the State of Maryland,by C. M. FECOT, JR. ,Vice-President,and C. W. ROBBINS I Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI,Section 2, of the By-Laws of said Com- pany, which reads as follows: "The President,or any one of the Executive Vice-Presidents,or any one of the additional Vice-Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Sec- retary or any one of*the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice-Presidents, Assistant Vice-Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries and Attorneys-in-Fact as the business of the Company may require,or to authorize any person or persons to execute on . behalf of the Company any bonds,undertakings,recognizances,stipulations,policies,contracts,agreements,deeds,and releases and assignments of judgments,decrees,mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages,and also all other instruments and docu- ments which the business of the Company may require,and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint F. Hugh Wiley of San Francisco, California i rue and lawful agent and Attorney-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings.................... e execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents,shall be as binding upon said Company,as fully and amply,to all intents and purposes,as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of F. Hugh Wiley, dated August 8, 1966. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the aforegoing is a true copy of Article VI,Section 2,of the By-Laws of said Company,and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice-President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, t11is --................... 0th------------•---•----------day of_.................S%PtQmbeZ................... A.D. 19.16--•. ?.a9D Pos FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF 51ARYLAND ��� moo:• ATTEST: o SEAL N e' Assistant Secretary Vice-President STATE OF MARYLAND l SS: CITY OF BALTIMORE f On this 10th day of September , A.D. 19 76 , before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland,in and for the City of Baltimore,duly commissioned and qualified,came the above-named Vice-President and Assistant Secretary Of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,to me personallyknown to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument,and they each acknowledged the execution of the same,and being by me duly sworn severally and each for himself deposeth and saith;that they are the said officers of the Coin pany aforesaid,and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company,and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TEmmoNY WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal,at the City of Baltimore,the day and year first above written. AP.y9N= Notary Public Commission Expires._JJUly-..1,,.1,978 E ;` CERTIFICATE 1,the undersigned.Assistant Secretary of the FIDELTTY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full,true and correct copy,is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate;and I do further certify that the Vice-President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice-Presidents spe. - cially authorized by the.Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney-in-Fact as provided in Article VI,Section 2 of the By-Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY of MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. REsOLvED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter,wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney Issued by the Company,shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 12th day of June P19 78 00115 L1419—Ctf. 201494 ASJtrt,,t Idly µ~ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTP,A COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Natter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map of ) RESOLUTION'NO. 78%632 Subdivision MS 56=-78 ) Byron Area. The following document was presented for Board approval this date: The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 56-78, propertylocated in the Byron area, said map having been certified . by the proper officials ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject. on behalf of .the-public any of the streets`, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978• Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director - LD Director of Planning Gwendolyn Richart Rt. 1, Box 88 Byron, CA94514 RESOLUTION NO. . 78f 632 t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map of ) RESOLUTION NO. 73/633 Subdivision MS 106..-77, ) Brentwood Area. ) The following document was presented for Board approval this date The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 106-77, property located in the Brentwood area, said map having been certified by the proper officials ; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED by the `Board on June 27, 1978• Originating Department: Public Works �^ Land Development Division cc: Public Works-Director - LD Director of Planning Vaquero Farms 'Inc..- 1210 E. 11th Streat Tracy, CA. f _ w RESOLUTION NO. 78/633 001.1' } f Y�'S �'11=�r I�.+ 2� l � y `�" F rT�,('.f.'1�•� 1-S�t j ; Y a 3a��.T..��YH.�� t—�d .L.A'Z f 1�t ' .t h++� 1�. `' _ -� x.sjr""� .f` e'f _ -{' a. , [.P,�^ i :� f ,f• ri �3,k .."��ff r t�+ai IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map of ) RESOLUTION NO._ 78/634 Subdivision MS 35-78, ) Pacheco Area. ) The following document was presented for Board approval this date : The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 35-78, property located in the Pacheco area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978- Originating Department _Public Works Land Development Division cc : Public Works Director - LD Director of Planning Raymond Porter . 172 Ironwood Dr. Pacheco, CA 94553 00118. RESOLUTION NO- 78/634 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY; CALIFORNIA Re: Initiation of Proceedings ) RESOLUTION NO. 73/636 for Orinda Open Space ) Boundary Reorganization ) (Gov.C. §956430-56432) RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR ORINDA OPEN SPACE BOUNDARY REORGANIZATION The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Application for the subject Reorganization- was filed by this Board with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County on March 30, 1978. This Reorganization is comprised of the following. changes of organization: 1. An annexation to the East Bay Municipal Utility District, 2. Detachments from and annexations to County Service ,Areas R-6 and P-4, 3. . .Detachments from and annexations to the Moraga and Orinda Fire Protection Di stxi��.s, 4. A detachment from and an annexation to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, and 5. A detachment from the West Contra Costa Hospital District_ The reason for this Reorganization is to release undeveloped ' lands from urban services taxing jurisdictions and to establish more logical boundaries for the districts involved. On June 7, 1978, after public hearing, the Local Agency Forma- tion Comru.ssion of Contra Costa County approved the Reorganization, as set forth above. The particular changes of organization described hereinabove, and any terms and conditions applicable thereto, along with any findings, statements of supporting facts, reasons and determinations of the Local Agency Formation Commission relating thereto, are as more particularly described in the Resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Contra Costa.Making Determina- tions and Approving the Proposed Orinda 'Open Space Reorganization, passed and adopted on June 7, 1978, a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of this Board. The legal descriptions of the affected territory for each change of organization are as shown in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto. In approving the above-described Reorganization, the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County, inter alia, found the property in question to be legally' uninhabited, desig- nated the proposal as the "Orinda Open Space Boundary Reorganization", designated the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as the conducting agency for the Reorganization, and adopted a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance_ 00119 R✓SOLUTION NO. 78/636 At 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, August 8, 1978 in the Board of Super- visors Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, this Board will conduct a public hearing on the proposed Reorganiza- tion. At that time all interested persons or taxpayers, for or against the proposed Reorganization, will be heard. Anyone desiring to make written protest against said Reorganization shall do so by written communication filed with the Clerk of the Board of Super- visors not later than the time set for hearing. A written protest by a landowner shall contain a description sufficient to identify the land owned by him; a written protest by a voter shall contain the residential address of such voter. At the conclusion of the hearing, or within 30 days thereof, this Board may either disapprove the proposed Reorganization, order the Reorganization subject to confirmation of the voters, or order the Reorganization without - election. ' The Clerk of this Board shall have this Resolution published once a week for two successive weeks in the "Orinda Sun" (a, news paper of general circulation published in this County and circulated in the territory of the subject Reorganization) , beginning not later than 15 days before the hearing date. The Clerk also shall post this Resolution on the Board's bulletin board at least 15 days before the hearing date and continuing until the time of the hearing. The Clerk also shall mail notice of the hearing by first class mail at least 15 days beforehand and addressed in the manner provided in Government Code §56089 to each of the Districts affected, -any -affected cities, .the petitioner(s) , and each person who has theretofore filed with the Clerk a request for a special notice. PASSED and ADOPTED on June 27, 1978, unanimously by all Supervisors. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution entered. on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Central Contra Costa Sanitary District County Service Area R-6 Citizens Advisory Cte. County Service Area P-4 Citizens Advisory Cte. Mrs. Susan Watson East Bay Municipal Utility District West Contra Costa Hospital District Moraga Fire Protection District Orin- da Fire Protection District LAFco - 'Executive Officer County Assessor Public Works Director DCG:g -2- 0012� RESOLUTION NO. 78/636 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CC411111,1SSICN 91-79 Contra Costa County, .California Description Date.. 6/7/78 BY= Orinda Area Open Space Boundary Reorganization EXHIBIT "A" Orinda Area Open Space Annexation to the East Bay.Municipal Utility District i , Being a portion of Section 16, To.-nship 1 South, Range 3 West, t Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows; t w Beginning at a point on the southern boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, as it exists in Contra Costa County, said point also being, on the northern line of said Section 16 lying 1000.68 . f feet from the northeastern corner of said Section 16; thence, leaving i said boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District and the-northern ; line of said Section 16, Southerly, at right angles from said northern line of Section 16, 300.00 feet; thence Westerly, parallel to and 300.00 feet southerly of said northern line of Section 16, 580•.80 feet; thence Northerly, at right angles from said northern line of Section 16, 300.00• . feet to saki northern line of Section 16, said point also being on said southern boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, thence, t Easterly, along said southern boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility < , District and said northern line of Section 16, 580.80 feet to' the point of beginning. 4 Containing 4.00 acres, more or less. Y 1 M21. 92-79 _ 2 _ Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from and Annexations to County 'Service Area R-6 Amended Description of County Service Area R-6 Beginning at an angle point of-the common boundary of County Service- Area P_4 and County Service Area R-6, said point being the northwestern corner of Rancho Acalanes; thence Southerly,, along.said common boundary, 6400 feet, more or less, to the most northern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Johnson Clark, et al, recorded January 18, 1957, in Book 2916, of Official Records, page 600; `thence, leaving said common boundary, South 440' 05' 44" East, 59.66 feet; thence South 870 17' 35" Fast, 71.38 feet to the north- eastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed.to George C. Larsen, et,ux, recorded January 21, 1966, in Book 5041, of Official Records, page 686; thence South 00 19' 55" East, along the eastern line of said Larsen par cel (5041 OR 686) and its southern extension, 263.07 feet to the northern line of the parcel of-land described in the deed.' to Howard A. Russell, et ux, recorded June 1, 19.56, in.Book 2778, of Official Records,-page 533; thence South 85° 30' cast, along said north- , ern line of the Russell parcel (2778 OR 533), 144.94 feet to'the north eastern corner thereof; thence Southerly and Westerly, along the eastern and.southern lines of said Russell parcel (2778 OR 533) and the western extension of said southern line, as follows; South 8p 54' East, 109:44 feet; South 60 26' 59" West, 112.88 feet; South 540 08' 25" West, •54.27 feet; North 830 07' 58" West, 127.61 feet; North 520, 33' '56" West, 8$.90 feet and North 7810 41' 56" West, 40 feet,. more or less, to a point on said common boundary of County Service Area P-4 and County Service Area Rr6; thence Southerly, along said common boundary, 2180 feet, more or less, to the northern line of Lot 31 of Tract 3035, filed July 13, 1962 in Map Book 88, at page 8; thence, leaving said common boundary, Easterly, Southeasterly and Southwesterly,.along the northern" and eastern lines of . 0 z v - 3 -- said Tract '3035, -as followss North 870 06' 09".East9 244.80 feet;- South 400 05' East,• 160.50 feet; South 520 25' East, 238.00 feet; South 239 55' West, 150.00 feet; South 56° 45' East, 198.00 feet; South 820 05' East, 107.50 feet; South 680 45' East, 205.75 feet and South 330 05' 33" West, 842.87 feet to the southern most corner of Lot 41, of said Tract 3035, said point also being on said common .boundary 'of County Service Area P-4 and County Service Area R-6; thence in a general Southerly and Westerly direction, along said common boundary, also being..the southern boundary of the City of Lafayette and the western boundary of the Town of Mforaga, 30,500 feet, more.or less, to the southern most corner of the parcel of land described in the.deed to the State of California, recorded October- 16, ctober16, 1968, in Book 5731 of Official Records, page 245, said point -also being '. on the western line of Rancho Laguna de. los Palos Colorados; thence, leaving the western boundary of the Town of Moraga and said. common boundary - of County • Service Area P-4 and County Service Area R-6,-in a general-North- Westerly eneral-North-westerly direction, along said western line -of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, as followss North 700 54' 27" West,. 1758.61 feet; North 420- 45' 31" West, 1491.27 feet; North 16P 55' 10" West, 3950.79 feet and North 230 19' 57" West, 322.99 to the southeastern corner of the parcel of land- described in the deed to Herbert W. Funk, et ux recorded October 11, 1965, in Book 4970, of Official Records, page 439; thence, leaving said •western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, West, along the southern dine of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439), 430 feet, more or less, to the northeastern.corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to the East Bay Municipal Utility District, recorded March 21, 1955, in--Book 2498, of Official Records, page 226; thence Southerly, Southwesterly, .Northwester- ly and Easterly, along--the eastern, southern, western and northern line of said East Bay Municipal Utility District parcel. (2498 OR 226), as follows-, South 00 22' 30" West, 268.66 feet; South 810 22' 43" West, '19r.99 feet; South 460 03' 42" West, 154.80 feet; North 430. 56' 18" West, 220.84 feet; . -North 27* 03' 48" West, 250.04 feet and South 890 37' 30" East,. 20 feet, more or less, to the southwestern corner of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439); 00123 777--77 77777 7777-77 - 4 - .thence 4 _thence North, along the western line of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439), . 1330 feet, more or less,, to the northwestern corner of the parcel of" land described in the deed as Parcel Five in the deed to Robert L. Sherwood, et al, recorded May 6, 1977, in Book 8319, -of Official Records, page 331; thence Fast, along the northern line of said Parcel Five (8319 OR 331), . 260 feet, more or less, to the western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados; thence North 230 43' West, along said'western line of Rancho Laguna de los.Palos Colorados, 1400 feet, more or.less, to *the southeastern-corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, recorded February 11,.1922, in Book 404, of Deeds, page 388, said point also being on the southern line of Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 3 West, Mount Diablo Base and. Merid-' ian; thence South 8910 34' 10" West, along the southern line of' said Section 3, 1088.31 feet-to the northeastern line of the.parcel of•land described in a deed to Henry J. Kaiser Company; thence Northwesterly, along the,.northeastern line of said Henry J. Kaiser Company.parcel and its northwestern exltenszon, as follows: North 370 30' West, 211.86. feet; North. 38° 30' West, 1254.0 feet; North 500 West, 1287.00 feet; North 67" 15' West, 132.00 feet; North 780 West, 138.6 'feet; North 66. �5• West, 66.00 feet and North 530 20' West, 1050 feet, more or less, .to -an angle point on the western boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sani- tary District; thence Northeasterly, Northwesterly and Southwesterly, along said•western boundary. of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, 9500 feet, more or less, to an angle point on' said Western boundary, said point being the southwestern corner of Lot- 50, of. the Resubdivision of Block F M & L, Orinda Park Terrace, recorded on April. 17, 1923, in Map Book 18, at page 414 1/2, said point also being on the southeastern line of Orinda Park Tract, filed May 8, 1882, in Map Book F, at page 143; thence along the southeastern line of said Orinda Park Tract (M.B. F-143), South•700 56' 30" West, 2810 feet, more or less, to the eastern line of Lot 18, Section 5, Township 1 South, Range 3 West, Mount Mablo Base and Meridian; thence Southerly and Northwesterly, along the eastern and south_ ern lines of said Lot 18, as follows; South 00 32' 41" West, 113.95 feet and North 730. 13' 19" West, 188.12 feet to the most western corner of said t - - 00124 • -: �• r..,. .. ._:.,,c.-- :".- ,:..:!fir i,...:.:^ � ","., ., �+u..-'—. ... .a.... .. . _ �c_i ^�. .+.'r:. -� `_"'L:'.!'�1s- ..''rz "Y. .,."'S`i2. . _,..... _ 5 _ Lot 18, said point also being on said southern line of Orinda Park Tract (F-143); thence Westerly and Northwesterly, along the southeastern and southwestern.lines of said Orinda Park Tract (F-143)", as follows; North 870 22' 10" West, 1386.00 feet; North 470 02' 30" West, 1541.63 feet; North 250 '10' 15" West, 140.52 feet and North 220 12' 20" West, 152.07 feet to the southwestern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Robert H. Johnson, et al, recorded December 17, 1975, in Book 7714, of Official -Records, page 875; thence Northwesterly, along the western line of said Johnson parcel (7714 OR 875), as follows$' north 220 12' 20" West, 74.4 feet; North 60 16' West, 284.0 feet; North 280 ' 18' West, 88.0 feet; North 360 25' West, 332.0 feet and North 150 52' ." West, .290.0 feet to the southwestern corner of the parcel of land des- cribed in the deed to the Fidelity Subsidiary Corporation, recorded. March 27, 1969, in Book 5841, of Official Records page 410; thence in a general Northerly, Northeasterly and Southeasterly direction, Along the southwestern, northwestern and northeastern lines of said Fide lty Subsidiary Coro.. aaraza (5841 OR 410),_ as•follows; North 150 52'-West; 668.0 feet; North 220 52' West, 1045.0 feet; North 420 45' West, 331.0 feet; North. 5410 07' 50" East, 3208.3 feet; South 630 03' East, 257.1 -feet; North 540.07' 50" East, 478.50 feet and South 30° 53'' East, 998.4 feet; thence South 300 53' East, 93.2 feet to the northwestern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Douglas R. Xrotz, recorded December 29, 1972, in Book 6830, of Official Records, page'512; thence North 860 07' 28" East, along the northern line of said I(rotz parcel (6330-OR 512), 566.21 feet to the northeastern corner thereof; thence- North 420 54' 45" East, 405.89 feet; thence North.510 48' East, 105.29 feet; thence North 530 West, 51.76 feet; thence North 520 East, 194,16 feet; thence South 530 East, 51.76 feet to a point on the northern line of Lot 2, Orinda Villa Park, filed August 14,1914, in Map Bookll,• at page 265; thence North 51.0 118' East, along the northern line of said Orinda Villa Park, (M.B. 11-265), 700 feet, more or'less, 7to the center 001,25 . "Qar= of San Pablo*Dam Road; thence Northwesterly, along: the center of San- Pablo Dam Road, 1650 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the center of Bear Creek Road; thence Northeasterly,and Easterly, along the center of Bear Creek Road, 13,200 feet, more or less, to the intersection -of the western boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District with -eastern boundary .of County Service Area F-6; thence in a general Easterly direction, along the western.boundary of the Central Contra t Costa Sanitary District, 10,770 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the eastern boundary of County Service Area P-4; thence Southerly , and Westerly, along the eastern boundary of County Service Area P_4, 2700 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 7,220 acres, more or less. 0012q -;•-, rr'�C'.�-u�r::.a"�. ._..-w� Rai w�.-s.-.'.� "'� .'.; tXkr i 93-79 - 7 - Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from and Annexations to County Service Area P-4 Amended Description of County Service P-4 Beginning at an angle point of" the.common boundary of County Service Area P-4 and County Service Area R-6, 'said point being the northwestern corner of Rancho Acalanes; thence Southerly, along said common. boundary, 6400 feet, more or less, -to the most northern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Johnson Clark, et al,' recorded January 18, 1957, in-Book 29169 of.Official Records, page. 600; thence.' leaving said common boundary, South 440 05' 44" East;- - 59.66 feet; thence South 876 17' 3511 Fast, 71.38 feet to the north- eastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to George `C. Larsen, et ux, recorded January 21, 1966, in Book 5041, of Official Records-, page 686; thence South 06 19' .55" East, along the eastern Iine of said Larsen parr cel (5041 OR 686) and its southern extension, 263.07 feet tothe northern. line. of the parcel of land described in .the deed to Howard A. Russell, et ux, recorded June 1, 1956, in Book 2778; of-* Official Records, page 533; thence South-856 30' Fast, along said north- ern line of. the Russell parcel (2778 OR 533)9 144.94 feet to the north- eastern corner thereof; .thence Southerly and Westerly, along the' eastern and southern lines of said Russell parcel (2778 OR 533) and the western - extension of said southern line, as follows; South 86 54' Fast,* 109.44 : feet; South 60 '26* 59" West, 112.88 feet; South 546 081. 25" West, 54.27 feet; North 836 07' 58" West, 127.61 feet; North 526 33" 56" West, ,88.90 feet and North 786 41' 56" West, 40 feet, more or less, to. a point on said common boundary of County Service Area P-4- and County. Service Area R-6; thence Southerly, along said common boundary, 2180 feet, more or-. less, to the northern line of Lot 31 of Tract 3035, filed July 13, 1962 in Yap Book 88, at page 8; thence, leaving said common boundary, Easterly, Southeasterly and Southwesterly, along the northern and eastern lines of 0012` .—..^'.aati '., .. ...1.y..,.,_ .-«>,--... -.... ..,.-..-iC'.'i� �-L'�,•.. a ..1�':=�_ �c:nG. ..• tt r- ..'.�i✓�•�'Rn''5-:aJ4tlC2��:+';'}�.j1''-`r' i :s• a Jn - 8 - said Tract 3035, as follows$ North 870-01 09" East, 244.80 feet; South 40a 05' Fast, 160,50 feet; -South 520 25' East, 238.00 feet; South 230 55' West, 150.00 feet; South 560 45' East, 198.00.feet; South 826 05' East, 107.50 'feet; South 680 4511 East, 205.75 feet and South 330 05' 33" West, 842.87 feet to the southern most corner of Lot 41, .of said Tract. 3035, said point also being on said common boundary of County Service. Area P-4 and County Service Area R.-6; thence in a general Southerly and Westerly direction, along said common.boundary, also being the southern boundary of the City of Lafayette and the western boundary of the Town .of Moraga, 30,500 feet, more or less, to the southern most corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to. the State of California, recorded October 16, 1968 ' in*Book 5731 of Official Records, page 245, said point also being on the western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados; thence, leaving the western boundary of the Town of Moraga and said common boundary of -County Service Area P-4 and County Service Area R-6, in a general.North- westerly direction, al--ng said Western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos . Colorados, as follows$ North 70° 54' 27" West, 1758.61 feet; North 420 45. 31" West, 1491.27 feet; North 16° ,55' 10" West, 3950.79 feet andYarth 230 191 57" West, 322.99 to the southeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to Herbert W. Funk, et ux recorded October 11, 1965;. in Book 4970, of Official Records, page 439; thence, leaving said western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, West, along the southern line of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439), 430 feet; more or less, to the northeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to the East Bay Municipal Utility District, recorded March 21, 1955, in Book 2498, of Official Records, page 226; thence Southerly, Southwesterly,. Northwester- ly and Easterly, along the eastern, southern, western and northern line of said East Bay Municipal Utility District parcel (2498 OR 226), as follows$ South 00 22' 30" West, 268.66 feet; South 810 22' 43" West,'-19.99 feet; South 4611 03' 42" West, 154.80 feet; North 43a. 56' 18" West, 220.84 feet; North 270 03' 48"1 West, 250.04 feet and South 890 37' 30" East, 20 feet, more or less, to the southwestern corner of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439); 00128 T�-r thence North, along the western line of said Funk parcel (4970 OR 439), 1330 feet, more or less, to the. northwestern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed as Parcel Five in the deed to .Robert L. Sherwood, et al, recorded May 6, 1977, in Book'8319, of Official Records, page 331; thence. East, along the northern line-of said Parcel Five (8319 OR 331), 260 feet, more or less, to the western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados; thence North 2311 43' West, along said western line of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, 1400 feet, more or less, to the southeastern corner of the parcel of land described in the deed to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, recorded February 11, 1922, 'in•;Book' 4049 of Deeds, page 388, said point also being on the southern line of Section 3, Township 1 South, Range 3 West, Mount D;ablo Base and Merid- ian; thence South 8911 34' 10" West, along the southern line of said Section 3, 1088.31 feet to the northeastern line of the parcel of land described in a deed to Henry J. Kaiser Company; thence Northwesterly, along the northeastern line of said Henry J. Kaiser Company parcel and : its north.;estern exters_`on, as follows; North 370 30• West, 211.86 feet; North 3811 30' West, 1254.0 feet; North 5011 West, 1287.00 feet; North 670 15' West, 132.00 feet; North 780 West, 138.6 feet; North 6611 15' West, 66.00 feet and North 530 20West, 1050 feet, more or less, to s an angle point on the western boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sani- tary District; -thence Northeasterly, Northwesterly and Southwesterly, r along said western boundary of theCentralContra.Costa Sanitary District, 9500 feet, more or less, to an angle point on said western boundary, said point being the southwestern corner of Lot 50, of the Resubdivision'of Block F M & L. Orinda Park Terrace, recorded on April 17,1923, in Map Book 18, at page 414 1/2, said point also being on the southeastern line of Orinda Park Tract, -filed May 8, 1882, in Map Book F. at page 143; thence along the southeastern line of said Orinda Park .Tract (M.B. F-143), - South 7011 56' 30" West, 2810 feet, more or less, to the eastern.line of Lot 18, Section 5, .Township 1 South, Range 3 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian; thence Southerly and Northwesterly, along the eastern and south- ern lines of said Lot 18, as follows; South 0' 32' 41" West, 113.95 feet. and North ?311 13' 19" West, 188.12 feet to the most western corner of .said 00129 - 10 - Lot 18, said point also being on said southern line of Orinda Park Tract (F-143); thence Westerly and Northwesterly, along .the southeastern and southwestern lines of said Orinda Park Tract (F-143), as follows, North 870 22' 10" West, 1386.00 f eat; North 470' 02' 30" West, 1541.63 feet; North -250 10' 15" West, 140.52 feet and North 220 12' 20".West, 152.07 feet to the southwestern corner of the parcel of land described in the 'deed to Robert H. Johnson, et al, recorded Deeember.17, 1975, in Book 7714, of Official Records, page 875; thence Northwesterly, along the western line of said Johnson parcel (7714 OR 8?5), as follows, North 220 12' 20" West, 74.4 f eat; North 60 16' West, 284.0 feet; North 280 18' West, 88:0 feet; North 360 25' West, 332.0 feet and North 150 52' West, 296.0 feet to the southwestern corner of the parcel of land des- cribed in the deed to the Fidelity Subsidiary Corporation, recorded March 27, 1969, in Book 5841, of Official Records page 410; thence in a general Northerly, Northeasterly and Southeasterly direction,- along the southwestern, northwestern and northeastern -lines of said Fidelity _ -Subsidiary Corp. parcel (5841 OR 410), as follows, North 150 52' West, 668.0 feet; North 220 52' West, 1045.0 feet; North 420 45' West, 331.0 feet; North 540 07' 50" East, 3208.3 feet; South.630 03' East, 257.1 feet; North-540 07' 5011 East, 478.50 feet and South 300 53' East, 998.4 feet; thence South 300 53' East, 93.2 feet to the northwestern corner -of the parcel of land described in the deed -to Douglas R. Krotz, recorded December 29, 1972, in Book 6830, of Official Records, page 512; thence North 860 07' 2811 East, along the northern line of said Krotti parcel (6830 OR 512), 566.21 feet to the northeastern corner thereof; thence North 420 54* 45"' East, 405.89 feet; thence North 510 48g -East, 105.29 feet; thence North 530 West, 51.76 feet; thence North 520 East,. -194.16 feet; thence South 530 East, 51.76 feet to' a point on the northern line of Lot 2, Orinda Villa Park, filed August 14, 1914, in Map Book 11, .at page 265; thence North 510 48' East, along the northern lineof said Orinda-Villa Park, (M.B. 11-265), 700 feet, more or less, to the center 001CI3.4 __.__ r-« -.: ... _ _,K-.. «..... .. . _ Yms .t - ....�.,.�s%--. .�,i4 ' .ita,•L,. *.':�.v��3*v�tiN«y ..c �"z�,i�"ry'.t':�su'+ti..Y Y^r �'.f.°ta.A.!i:+�?�, of San Pablo Dam Road; thence Northwesterly, along the center of San Pablo Dam Road, 1650 feet:, more or less, to its intersection with the center of Bear Creek Road; thence Northeasterly and Easterly, along the center of Bear Creek Road, 13,200 feet, more or less, to the intersection-- of the western boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District with eastern boundary of County Service Area R-.6; thence in a general - Easterly direction, along-the western boundary of the-Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, 10,770 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the eastern boundary of County Service Area P-k; thence Southerly and Westerly, along the eastern boundary of County .Service.Area' P-4, 2700 feet, more -or less, to the point of beginning. Containing-7,220 acres, more or less. - - r 00131 94_79 12 _ 95-79 Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from the Moraga Fire Protection District and A-zexation to the Orinda Fire Protection District Being a portion of Sections 3, 49 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 16, Township 1 South, Range 3 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as followss Beginning at a point on the common boundary -of the Orinda Fire Protection District and the Moraga Fire Protection District, said point being on the southern line of said Section 11; thence, leaving .saidcommon boundary, Westerly, along the southern line of said Se.ctipris 11, :10 and 9, 6560.feet, more or less, to a point lying 1000.68 feet from the southeastern corner of said Section 9; .thence, leaving the ' southern line of said Section 9, Southerly, at right angles from said southern line of said Section 9, 300.00 feet; thence Westerly,-.parallel to and 300.00 fea- autherly- of said southern line of Section 9, .580.80 feet; thence Northerly, at right angles from said southern line of Section 9, 300.00 feet to said southern line of Section 9; thence Wester- ly, along the southern line of Section 9, 2540.22 feet to the southern boundary of Contra Costa County; thence Northwesterly, along the south- ern boundary of Contra Costa County, 4870 feet, more or less, to its intersection of the common boundary of the Orinda Fire Protection District and the Moraga Fire Protection District; thence is a general Northeasterly and Southeasterly direction along said common boundary of the Orinda Fire Protection -District and the Moraga Fire Protection District, 19,500 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 1500 acres, more or less. 001 32 rst- a..�-.sem^'_, z!?1,4;': 94-79 95-79 _ 13 - Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from the Orinda Fire Protection District and Annexation to the Moraga Fire Protection District (Two Parcels) Parcel One. . Being a portion of Rancho Laguna'de los Palos Colorados, described as followst Beginning at the northern most corner of Lot 50, Rheem.Highlands, filed August 11., 1948, in Map Book 35, at page 38, said point being on the western boundary of the Town of oraga; thence Northeasterly, Norther-: ly and Easterly, along the western and northern boundaries of the Town of MDraga, 545 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the western boundary of the Moraga Elementary School Ustrict; thence, leaving the northern boundary of the Town of Moraga, Southerly, along the western boundary of-the FLementary School District, 440 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the western boundary of the' Town of Moraga; thence leaving said School District boundary, North -56°' 17' 30" West, along the western boundary of the Town of Moraga, 470 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Containing 2.64 acres, more or less. .Parcel Two. Being a portion of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Colorados, described as follows; Beginning at the northeastern corner of Lot 20, Tract 2898, filed January 11, 1961, in Map Book 81, at page 6, said point being-on the western boundary of the Town of iioraga; thence Southeasterly and North- easterly, -along the western boundary of the Town.of Moraga, 345 feet, more or less, to the western boundary of the Moraga Elementary School District; thence, leaving said boundary of the Town of Moraga, Southerly, along the western boundary of the Moraga Elementary-School District, 460 00133 - _.:• .: __.....:.' c_;j w__-,!.. .. . ... '» - W,'_'.,/,e ave.,c,�`" .- .�'���!*, n �; ..r. _��,�._ _ 14 feet, more or less, to an angle point on the eastern boundary of the Orinda Fire Protection District; thence, leaving said School District boundary, Westerly, along the eastern boundary of the Orinda Eire Protection District, 360 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the western boundary of the Town of Moraga; thence, leaving said boundary of the Orinda Fire Protection District, Northerly and North- easterly, 'along the western boundary of the Town of Moraga, 505 feet, more or less, to the"point of beginning. Containing 3.03 acres, mcre or less. 95-79 - 15 - Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Being a portion of Rancho Boca de la Canada del Pinole, described as follows} Beginning at a point on the western boundary of the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, said point being the intersection of the western line of Rancho Boca de la Canada del Pinole with the center of Bear Creek Roa d; thence North 00 09' 30" East, along the western boundary of the' Central Contra Costa Sanitary District and the western line. of Rancho Boca de la Canada del Pinole, 2640 feet, more or less, to an -angle point in said Sanitary District boundary, said point being the western extension of the southern line of the parcel of land described in the-deed as Parcel.. One to the East Bay Municipal Utility District, recorded Noveinber 20, 1975 in Book 768.9, of Official Records, page 104; thence, -leaving said Rancho line, North 830 49' East; along said western boundary of the Central Contra Costa -San± .a-y LL pct, 1014.18 feet to the center of Bear_Creek- Road; thence, leaving said Sanitary District boundary, Southerly and Southwester- ly, along the center of Bear Creek Road, -2960 feet, more or less, to'the point of beginning. Containing 37.26 acres, more or less. 0013.5 96-79 - 16 _ Orinda Area Open Space Annexation to the Central 'Contra Costa Sanitary.District Being a portion of Rancho Boca de la Canada del Pinole, described as follows,' Beginning at a point within Bear Creek Road, said point being the intersection of the western boundary of the Central. Contra Costa Sanitary Bistrict with the eastern*boundary 'of County Service Area R-6; thence,, leaving said:eastern boundary of County Service Area R-6, Northwester- ly, Southwesterly and Westerly, along, said western boundary of the. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, 3700 feet, more or less, to the center of Bear Creek Road; thence, leaving said Sanitary District boundary,- north- easterly oundary, northeasterly and Southeasterly, along the center of Bear Creek .Road, .3500*' feet, more or less- to the point of beginning Containing 17.74 acres, more or less. 0013 .? a t y A,5-K';•^z 1,�z.+tiF^- .. ._ ,_:r. .. ih7' _... ', r _.�..-7 x..�':.::..'E ._ .._�t-- ...'� ». .. .'`:i"':w . AC`T-.��.h�ti�i/ •1. ,+` � X�f3� " 97-79 - 17 - Orinda Area Open Space Detachment from the West Con tra Costa Hospital District Being a portion of Rancho El Sobrante and Rancho El Pinole, described as follows; Being a point on the southern boundary of the West Contra Costa Hospital District, said point being on the southern boundary- of Contra Costa County, said point also being on the eastern boundary of the Ken- sington Fire Protection District; thence, leaving the southern boundary of the West Contra Costa Hospital District and the southern boundary of Contra Costa County, Northerly, Northeasterly and Northwesterly, along the. eastern boundary of the Kensington Fire Protection District, 3800 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the eastern boundary of the City of Richmond; thence leaving said Fire District boundary, in a general Northeasterly direction, along the eastern boundary of 'the City of Rich- mond, 25,800 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the eastern boundary of County Service Area R-9; thence, leaving said City of Richmond boundary,, Northeaster� and Northwesterly, along the eastern boundary of County Service Area R-9, 15,500 feet, more or less, to the most western corner of- the parcel of -land described in the deed to the East Bay Muni- cipal Utility District, recorded April 25, 1957, in Book 2969, of .Official Records, page 595, said. point also being on the eastern line of the parcel of land.described in the deed to Alfred L. Marsten, et al, recorded .March 167 1965, in Book 4824, of Official Records, page 704; thence, leaving. said boundary of County Service Area R-9, Northeasterly, Northerly and westerly, along the eastern line of said Marsten parcel_ (4824 OR 704), as follows; North 640 41' 07" East, 1439.07 feet; North 10 45' 27" East, 657.77 feet and West, 568.92 feet to the southeastern corner of the par- cel of land described in the deed to Wade B. Olds, et ux, recorded November 129 1940, in Book 574, of Official Records, page 150; thence North 170 10' Fast, along the eastern line of Olds parcel (574 OR 150) and its northern extension thereof, 265 feet, wore or less, to the center of Pinole Valley 00137 - 18 _ Road; thence Southeasterly, along the center of Pinole Valley Road, 438.26 feet to.the southern extension of .the eastern line of the parcel of land described in the deed to Henry-W. Mohring, recorded March 15, 1965, in Book 4823, of Official Records, page 248; thence Northerly and Westerly, along said southern extension and the eastern and northern lines of said Mohring parcel (4823 OR 248) as-followss North 200 27' 03" East, .271.48 feet; North 690 32' 57" West, 37.12 feet; South 89"30' . 05" West, 210.41 feet; North 230 43' 32" West, 174.42 feet and North 67°. 021 .4211 West, 109.24 feet to the northwestern corner thereof, said point being on the eastern boundary of the City of Pinole; thence Northerly. - and Northeasterly, along the eastern boundary of the City of Pinole, 2710 feet, 'more or less, to its intersection frith the northern boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District; thence leaving said boundary of the City of Pinole, Northeasterly and Southeasterly direction,:along the northern boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, 21,910 - feet, more or less, to its intersection with the eastern boundary of-the West Cont--- Costa H=srmetal District; thence, leaving said boundary of the East Bay Municipal Utility District, in a general Southerly, Southwesterly and northwesterly direction, along the eastern and southern boundaries of the West Contra Costa Hospital District, 67,300 feet, more or'less, to the point of beginning. Containing 12,214 acres, more or- less. X39 _ ... .,._ '-. -- .. ... ,.✓ L,c ,.,7,,f.'�-��.1�:�.;T.'ti�y„a9y,:i:9s� Jre:yyar�' BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of _Annexation ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/637 No. 78-6 to County Service ) (Gov.C. ..§g56261, 56320, Area L-42 ) 56322, 56323, 56450) } RESOLUTION OF PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION AND ORDERING ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SERVICE AREA WITHOUT HEARING OR ELECTION The Contra Costa County,Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT.- This HAT:This annexation had been proposed by the Landowners of the subject area and applications therefore filed with the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission on April 26 and May 8 and 18, 1978. The reason for the proposed annexation is to provide the area to be annexed with street lighting services_ On June 7, 1978, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the proposal for the aforesaid annexation, subject to the condition that the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed .to be annexed be as described in Exhibit "A" , attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Said commission also found the territory pro- posed for annexation to be legally uninhabited, assigned the proposal the designation of "Annexation No. 78-6 to County Service Area L-42" , and authorized the Annexation without notice and hearing by this Board. = This Board hereby finds that this proposed annexation is in the best interest of the people of County Service Area L-42 and of the territory to be annexed. This Board hereby finds that the territory to be annexed is uninhabited, that no landowner therein filed a written protest, and that all landowners in the affected area have consented in writing to the proposed annexation. This Board hereby ORDERS this annexation without hearing, without election, and without being subject to confirmation by the voters. The Clerk shall transmit a certified copy of this Resolution along with the appropriate fees to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission, in accordance with Government Code 556450. PASSED and ADOPTED on June 27, 1978. cc: LAFCO - Executive Officer Sate Board of Equalization County Assessor County Recorder Count; Auditor-Controller Public Works Director P.G. & E. R. G. Zimmerman D. 0. Isakson Dan Paparoski DCG:g RESOLUTION NO. 78/637 00139 LOCAL AGENCY FORRATION COMISSION 125-79 Contra Costa County, California Description Date; 6/7/78 By; EXHIBIT "A" Annexation 78-6 to County Service Area L-42 (Three-Parcels) - Parcel One.. Being a portion of Rancho San Miguel, described as follows; Beginning ata point on the northern boundary of County Service Area L-42, said point being the intersection of the center of Treat Boulevard with the center of Cherry Lane; thence, leaving said bound- ary of County Service Area L-42, Northerly, along the center of Cherry Lane, 245 feet, more or less, to the western extension of the northern line of the parcel of land described in the deed to M. Dae Jenkins, et al, recorded January 23, 1978, in Book 8679, of Official Records, page 519; thence South 710 40' East, along said western extension and the northern line of said Jenkins parcel (8679 OR 519), 234.35 feet to' the northeastern corner thereof; thence Southerly, along the eastern line of said Jenkins parcel (8679 OR 519), and its southern extension, as follows; South 170 57' West, 94.12 feet; North 710 15"09" West, 34.01 feet and South 1811 09' 58" West, 120 feet, more or less, to the center of Treat Boulevard, said point also being on the northern bound ary of County Service Area L-42; thence Westerly, along said northern boundary of County Service Area L-42, 190 feet, more or less, to the _ point of beginning. Containing .90 of an acre, more or less. Parcel Two. Being-a portion of Rancho San Ramon, described as follows; Beginning at a point southern boundary'of County Service Area L-42, said point being on the southwestern right-of-way line of the.Southern Pacific Railroad, said point also being the northern most corner of Lot 001.40 - 2 - 4, Tract 4941, filed March 2, 1977, in Map Book 193, at page 29; thence, leaving said southern boundary of County Service Area L-42, Southeasterly, along the northeastern line of said Tract 4941- (M.B. 193-29) and the southwestern right-of-way line of said southern Pacific Railroad, 451.35 feet to the eastern most corner of said Tract 4941 (M.B. 193-29); thence South 68° 53' 161, West, along the southeastern line of said Tract 4941 (;I.B. 193-29), 555.07 feet to the southern most corner-thereof; thence North-290 51' 45" West, along the southwestern' line of said Tract 4941 (M.B. 193-29), 421.94 feet to the western most corner thereof, -said point also being on the southern boundary of County Service Area L-42; thence North 680 58' East, along the southern boundary of County Service Area L-42, 439.72 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 4.70 acres, more or less. Parcel Three. Being a portion of Lot 59, Larkey Ranch Subdivision No. 2, filed March 28, 1910, in Map Book 2, at page 499 described as follows; Beginning at a point on the southern boundary of the City of Pleasant Hill, said point being the intersection of the center of Geary Road with the northern extension of. the eastern line of the parcel of land described in the deed to Loren L. Henke, et al, recorded August 4,- 1977,- in Book 8450, -of Official Records, page 114; thence, leaving said City boundary, Southerly, Westerly and -Northerly,- along said northern extension and the eastern, southern and western lines of said Henke parcel (8450 OR 114) and the northern extension of said western line, as follows; South 20 21' East, 500 feet, more or less; South 890 05' 20T1 West, 176.63 feet and North 20 21' West, 500 feet, more or less, to the center of Geary Road, said point also being on the southern boundary of the City of Pleasant Hill; thence South 890 45. 10" East, along said City boundary, 176.6 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 2.02 acres, more or less. . 00141 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA As Governing Body of the County and of All the other Public Entities of which it is the, Governing Body 4, In the Matter of ) Implementing Government Code, . Division 4, Title 2, Part 1.5, ) Chapter 4 (SB 154, Statutes 1978) ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 638 by rescinding contract cost ) . of living increases. ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in all of its capacities as the governing body of th4s County and of the Districts and Public Agencies of which it is the governing body, RESOLVES THAT: 1. The State Legislat=e has enacted Chapter 292 of the Statutes of 1978 . (SB-154, approved by t^e Governor on June 24, 1978 as an urgency statute) to provide local agencies fiscal relief from the immediate effects of California Constitution, A-ticle XIIIA (Proposition 13, the "Jarvis Gann Initiative", approved by the voters on June 5, 1978) , and this resolution is to effectuate and comply with this statute. 2. Chapter 292 enacts Government Code Sec. 15280, which requires, . as a condition of receiving the assistance provided by the Act, that local public agencies may not provide any persons cost-of-living increases ex- cee-ding those V/hich may be provided State employees for the 1978-79 fiscal year. 3. This Board is resolved to implement the provisions of Chapter 292 so that this C:unty and Districts and Public Agencies governed by the Board may rece±ve the assistance provided thereby, in order to avoid large scale eloyee layoffs and to continue to be able to provide .es- sential public services. 4. This Board therefore declares that all cost-of-living increases beginning on or after July 1, 1978, granted in any contract, resolution or order of this Board,, or otherwise, are hereby rescinded; but if any cost-of-living salary. increase (s) in the 1978-79 fiscal year is/are pro- vided for State emplovees, tHas Board may reinstate such cost-of-living increases as Government Code 16280 permits, not to exceed that originally provided. 5. This Resolution is an emergency action. Article XIIIA becomes fiscally effective on July 1, 1978. The revenues of the County and of all other agencies .governed by this Board will be cut-off or drastically reduced beginning on July 1, 1978. Chapter 292 is effective as an urgency statute. Under these circumstances, there is and has not been time to give notice, to meet with contracting person, br to properly arrange the affairs of the County or the other agencies before taking this action. PASS$D by the board on June 27, 1978 by "the -folloiviirig vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, E. H. Hasseltine, and R. I. Schroder. - NOES : None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. RESOLUTION NO. 78/638 00142 CC: All Department Heads AlL Employee Organizations via Civil 'Service IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/639 Approval of the Parcel Map of ) Subdivision MS 5-783 ) Martinez Area. ) ) The following documents were presented for Board approval this date: -The Parcel Map of Subdivision MS 5-78, property •located in the Martinez area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with Pro-Land Development Company, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision ,agreement within one year from the date of said agreement; Said documents were accompanied by the fallowing: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvements as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows-:• a. Surety Bond (No. L05-027206) issued by Balboa Insurance Company with Pro-Land Development Company as principal, in the amount .of $5,400.00 for Faithful Performance and $3,200.00 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditors Deposit Permit Detail No.•..10162,.,dated June 16, .1978), in the amount of $1,000.00, deposited by: Pro=Land Development Company. NOW TIF-REFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and .. this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement_ is also APPROVED. ..PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director. - LD Director of Planning Pro-Land Development Company 1251 Springbrook Road Walnut 'Creek, CA 94596 00143 RESOLUTION NO. 78/639 ` SUBDIl I_SION AGR6111I.94T (M) subdivision: r,-7$1 , 'r (§1) Subdivider. ��-•n-7,-L;�ri ��.,,- _'•,- .. (Governmi nt Code M66.16' and .§§66463) (141) Effective Date: J'ta'e.27, 1978 (§1) Completion Period: ^t�^ 1. PAItHFN f DA7`1:.' EffeclAve on Lite above date, tbe'Crntnty- of Contra 'Costa, i California, hereinafter called '!CounLy", and Lite above named -Subdivider, mutually promise r and agree as follows, concerning-Uli•`is subdivision: � . • A 2. DUIRMUMN'17S... .Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road.and street improvement~, tract drainage, street signs, firo.hydrants.;.•and ail. .improvements as required by' the County Ordinance Code. especially Title 9, and Dicluding -future F amendments, and all improvements required in Lho improvement -plans- of thisIsubdivision as reviewed and on file in:the-County's Public Works Department. SubJividcr shall -complete, this work and improvements (hereinafter- called "work") within the above completion-:period t'rci�r, da.Le -hereof as required -1.)y the Ca1•ifornia'Suli- division hap Act (Governmont- Code §§b6410 and following), 'in a..good.:workmanlike manner, ' in accordance with accepted.constrtictiun'.Iiractic-es and in a manner:-'equal. or superior to the requirements v 1' tl�c.County Ord i najig a Code and. rulings made thereunder;.• and. where therr is a conflict between:the'-Improveinent pl•ans 'and 'the County Ordinance Code; :the ' stricter requirements shali"" 'e n. 3. GUARA I'I E. .Sulxl i'V i%Icr'guarantees, that. the , ork '1s -and will .he free from defects .:iitd will..perform satisfactori ly in accordance with Article 94-4.4'..of the County Ordinance (:^Je; and' lie. shat 1 .so guarantee it for one year after its completion and acceptance against -any defective workmanship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance: 4. I II'l;"l'Il'Utrr SECURITY: Upon executing this agreement, Subdivider shall; P pursuant to Goverrnl•ent Code §§ 66199. drl•o%i r as security with the County: A. I'or Performance and Guarantee: $1�•��'•.fin cash, plus additional security, in the amount of $• .!rr%.nr %h i ch together total the estimated cost of the work. Such addit icnal security is presented in the form of: ; G • ash, certified check, or cashier.'s check [� Acceptable coipnrato -surety Band ❑ Acceptable irrevocable letter of credit With this'security the Subdivider-guarantees his performance of this. agreement and of the, ` work for ,one year,•r•'ter completion and acceptance thereof against any defective workman- ship or materials -vi- any unsatisfactory perfhrm:ince. Upon completion .of. the work, Subdivider may request reducti.on 'of the amount of this .bond in accordance with .County : Ordinance. B. I-13r Payment:. Security in the amotint of �• - 0. , hailch'is I. the estimated cel-=t of the work. Such security is presented in the -form of: [I ' ash, certified clued.. or cashier's check f. .0 acceptable corporate surety bond i. ❑ Acceptable- irrevocable letter of credit With this security the Subdivider guarantees payment to the contractor, to his subcon- tractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials to them or to the Subdivider. 0014 'RECEIVED . juN.a 1978 MiuofilmI*I6&&" ad with board order / a CLMK B&Z oF-suP6lv1SORS . S. WARRANTY. .. Slibclividc•r r::rrrantr: (hat said imprcwenu•nl: plains are atleclinrte to accrnnplish this lvv,lf: r:: promised in `-1-t icrrr :rnd if, .at any time before the County's resolution of conl-Iction for the stilkiir.isicar, said improvement plans prove to be .inadequate in. any respect, Subdivider shall make changes necessary to accomplish the work as promised. 6. NO WAIVER BY COMM. I rrcpert:i rn of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected. or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the Count;,v indicat:.ing the .work or anv Inirt tiler--of complies with the requirements of this T ;. Agreement, or acceptance of the thole or :in), part .of said -work .and/or materials, or pay- ments therefor, or :illy combination or all of these acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider ` of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor .shall .the County he thereby. estopped -from.bringing any action for damages arising from the. failure. to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. IX'h15NLAITY. Subdivider shall livid harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the. County, and its special districts, elective :rnd appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. 'flte liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of arty kind .allegedly suffered, inc.,rrred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, dearth, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combi- nation of these, acrd regardless .of whether or iiot such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County reviewed said improvement.plans or accepted the work as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), actions) or other pro- ceeding(s) concerning these. C. 1lte iIctions causing; l.iabi1i.tr are any act or omission. '(negl igent or,non- negligent) in connection .with tite imitt.ers 'covert•d by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. 5. :�;on-conditi.oits: The promrise :rnd agreement in this section is not conditioned 'or dependent on whether or no;- all}- Indemnitee has prepared, -supplied or * : reviewed any plan(-,) Qr:specificat-ion(s) ill connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged. damage resulted partly from .any negligent or willfulmisconduct of- any Indemnitee. S. " COSTS. ..Subdivider sivill pay Mien due, all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and.relocating e..i.stitrg utilities required- thereby.' 9. SUTAE.YS. Subdivider clean t set -tttd establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed—.map-and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-.Surveyor. to. Nrf,Nl'11tl�tlltMilrti't:I: AND t;OST.i. II' 1;iilulivider fails to corirlilete the work wi..thiit the nine specified. ill this Agreenrrrit or extells-ierns granted, Coillity may proceed, to ccinrplete thew In contract (it- othcriiise, and Subdivider ::hall pay -the costs and. charges therefor immediately upon de7m.ind. If Count%• sues to comjrel performance of this Agreement or recover the cost of completing the work, Srrlrtl.ivide.r• shall pity all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of .litigation incurred by County in .connection therewith.. 11. ASSP NIJE T. If, I)efol'e t:crutt:ty :tcc(!ptS the work, the subdivision is' annexed to :t city, the County may at sign to' that city the County's rights under this Agreement and/or any deposit or bond securing them. -2- 90145 •�' i:'. ltl:C�»;;I 'MAP. In inu Itc'!'c•crf cotiiiiy :autl l al Iow Suhdivider Lo I iIo and I-c-t-111-11 the• Final Map oil for time Subdivision. CoNITI A COSTA COl1N'I ti' SLI BD LV LDISIt: (see-note below) Vernon L. CLine, Public Works Uircci c,r. �� r y Ucputy' (U ,Ila u Lci• c- )a Ly 't -'the buisines: � sem/ RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL* Note to Subdivi.der; (.l) Execute acknowledl;- �~ ment. form below; and if a corporation, affix' ' corliorate sea L. By. !!V - Assistant Publi-c Works Director (CORPORATE SEAL). FORM APPROVED: I(IIIN 11. CLAUSEN, County Counsel is a .. :Y is :`. :Y ., i't ., do`:`. :Y � is � :c is :: is is is .. ., :Y :Y :: :Y :: •:. �Y a ::' a it .. ::' oY X d: it .4r :Y k Stat (- of California ) (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership, County of or individual) On ���i `� �`\'lYy ; the pc rsun(::) whose• name(s) i4r/arc signed 'above for StJb(l i v I der and who is/are known to me to be the individual (s)' and officer(s) or partner(s) as stated above who signed this instrument, appeared before me and acknowledged to me that •{ hey executed it aild that the corpuraL ion or partnership named: above executed .it. FFICIAL SEAL (N EAL S. SANCHEZ <;_��J iJOTi•r1',i =�. Ci:UFORNIA OU My comm. expires OCT 29, BU Notary Public r srJ.id,County and SLA e (Suhdiv. Agrmt. Cta; Std. Form) LD-9 (Itcv 1/77) 00146 .. A .......a..::. .: .:. ..-.. .. a • .... .. . .�.. ..,ue .. .. .. ,. :. • ;. .. ...... ,__ :�r �.. :.,. .. .... ...;..,.✓6 ..wm. .. .. .... ....W.. :> .. .- .._..r. r .. ... n...... ..-, L. :..--....,... .. . . . .' ,::...... :..: "=,. . ..,, .. .. .-. • ...._ - ''• '{i' .,4.;: V 1 . . L : �- . - 9:. E I E . 1 E V C [hl! 1ZtrJi•: ii?il'� .,1:..I. Illy, iiU,1,1` . ..: . . : :.. .,.. . ..: a - �. . t. _ . . .. . .. .. ... .:..:. - _:._..r (..,. ::.. . . r,.;ln. c. esu t iL I. J.:R otssoat . _ 1. - a zt ee .tnil� I:a;.=,��i• i1ERIC a vtsoRs-,Y. .,., if.. . GC.);c ascii,. :,.oc.e;'�§404 .� t,.u..i�.) 10� ... .. .. . - .'.:: - .: :. J: .. - .. DUW ,_..: ..'i ., ,_T.n i ,it. . .r. .A• - .Lt -t•!r=t...t ..T. t 11: { /1 (. - _ rryy i,- .. .. ., . _ — :�' i,1.A'. .. -...•.* -y o n rte E rincl a.1. t.L.icl::::::< � Tsuran ce'C m . P , . - - - a roi no_ LlLic,r t. .. 3.]:�.;..ct zr•t en]..,'L tc, ,1 t, t:iie .,tate oi'' ,t.+:. .•1"t. l:::C .t :::: l r ::::..:.. in �uniie+ at,. « . n . . _ �. . .. - . .. - _--_ . . . i1n,.t a.utl,ot'� ':c:•I:: to -ti's n rc :i:3C'.t :':;1�r t;1':�fid:;,:lne::i.:i .�t1� �.a.1if or-nia .1.. :tlt6t:1 :'.:{,• -: :..:: :1�' ,l,J:iriL L :,ntl :S.0 lC.I " -'.:3`lt]4' :OLal':ie'J.,V dll w ht�J.1�.,:;-',.(:xecutoI �Iril:]l:,Li•aLo,2'- Lt e3so •CLnCI...'.a. . Ct]b .L-d: t•!t_e*:: :.AULlt of t.ont:r-1 Gos,•,i :: :C ,eI: IL • Y` Fey' _ 4 W7"" "F t}`• `a7+1d*L^','�,'+�'�r .j,/! .Ir t•v• �. �w.�'4'� a!j7r -3t'' 44�7� _ ♦ :: j o+d.. ,a �'r:, --:.;aa+D•.. ��� �'r,.i�f.n.L;�.,� ' rSv�� �.i�a�7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA t yt} )ss. I County of ,AN MATFO 1 On this `�L1/ day of /L•L�(~ 19� before.me• PAUL J. KONRATH � a Notary Public in and for the said County ofd MATEO State of CALIFORNIA , residing therein,duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared :10Y ASHMORE known to to be the Attorney-in-Fact of the r r Balboa Insurance Company, the corporation that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the Balboa Insurance Company thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact, 01171( IA! ZKAI Notary Public in and for the County of E YcA;)r.1._1979 SAN MATEQ State of ` IIfURN1A IL002ZR776 i 3 y, s'�, a 4'•.., x i� z. 00148: i� i } • r`.:. •• I •.. w Y �''� ,"Y -� 4• y y 1'..F `1^.�-1`�. t"Mt 12•! r tS �� rwq;' �+• . `. � .! 2 , 2 M � ,.,• :. �• `a l ... t r + 2 t,a�Y�f��a+•r �'�S.,a��.Y�:T�'lr �('�'i. I ✓I� SS� �,/..r't:ii sa a t^,\ Y v+• �.r-,� . t .r:> .er ! to :l .7 + Y y. . '� . K• 's _ p ?'t�`��. �.S+ajtrAi .J•"'vi .. . .. .. " c a i , . ...-I•i ai .. ..•w;i:� S X'J t. t.Q' � .ti ti71'F�.1..r 1} ' -state of QTxC- ,�� N �. •� Ont is.....:.. ......:...da o �.. ::.. ► [I y .—. ..........__.........A. D. 19i... be before me, 1' >. (ti..............................................a Notary Public in and for the said 4 County and.Slate. cgsiding therein. duly commissioned and sworn,personally ap- peared.....i !'...... .. . ...... ._..........................................................._..........._ .. _..... ........._............... .. .........._........ ._............................................................... 4 OFFICIALSEAL ...........—-------._......................................................................................................................... STELLA LOW known to me to be the person whose name.................................subscribed to the NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA within Instrument, and acknowled 4ed to me that he executed the same. ALAWEOA COUNTY A My Cammi:sian EIMIrts Mu.A 1"I . �n Witutss Xhsreaf, 1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official-seal ) the day and year in this Certificate first taa/bo�ve writ ��A. Notary Public i d to said Capntg and State of Calilornie Form GA—Som Hopkins Leila) Forms Printing Service. 2328 Fruilvole Ave..Oakland. Caul. LIM an hern o u his - t — _ e a tto •` ,'% r ,T• `' �_: c.;�.►� �It. !tl a u 1'i a o the f � ••+a : t; ••t+tie t :itt• itn 1 0022 6 EW-,lipr,t 79 SSA MA ateo 0049 s 7 ' .4 :,rH(tUtlt::: ttlle: 1!ll+i1•!' 1:11�'::r'tIC'nit•Irr:llp•r1t• Ifl::lll•:lfle'�' /il:l.• f:1r'i1 '1"e!::e�.•�!1. .1:+, tief :' ::nvk 4,v .l atl':el• i.11tila:: :::I i�F .i 1l1't••1•;! of l 1 I' 1•:1;• .tllel. :'•:Ili1+.` ''1.:1 :ltl:":1f ieeU111. .11++t• ' = vine-ad I tit- Lhv anniunt:: hi-vt!1 nah.-v/• ::f'i• ' I•(1J' .U. :Irl+l al l::lt r 1.11:• r!an.L" ::11:1 t ic' �' •f:� I+rr�u�,t11. trl+Utl L 11 t;;• 'I�e''ii•!:; AHA 1 l !+:l;;;• i!1 :add F W s.,r: 1. l lii:' 1':i.i:e:' :tl:lrltttTt. t-norcof'. ' rnc:t;:: :tl•.1 --re.-anonah.tc expect .e;::` and ree uc•lud;lnt .. rea:~onab.1e. :et torile;:'!'+ 'is 'r r;' iheti.rred,by Count:;. (or c3 t'y a ns'.1 i-ne'd .fn: :;ri'c.cess fu']ly: : . u# :•. enforcing -.Nkch ob.l i;at:: hrr.:; to 110% a:::nt•eletl :rivet t •seo-)•.'1 :tn11. to he•:t:axei! *:t:: ::o :l::;'•:>riil. to 1161 irlcli ded in t;he.•.ili&hF.;uPhL. thai'cilt. rcrl- ':`• rte:rt:d 3.1; I:: �lL`.t'a`I ;: [•J;nr'C.^.::Z;1 ::tlrllJt:lt.i:i1 :!!1•i :eJ-reC%.: tl:::t • t!l i:: I,Atlii ::if:il �. inure to. the jicne:l1t of. :any unci :0 1 :,rr aunn., CotipynLuin. R,LnJ..curpoi•;t0ons cllti•ticcf I.o •r1.1^ C'.'a ina. ti;dcr 9'ltt•: i5 (e:ommrnelnR;•'-.11th'Sect LiDr. iU$x') of Pant A of Clvil Voile'; so :t::.'t. •tr1; :t t•irt;t OI' act'1o11 t0 tr�:l?t'1 l�l•�t: C16'i•• i".L4 11.^• j1t :Ir11' ::flit !er•ry1;".11•t::'Ifl�i)tl 1 !11': l��:rii; l+11OUId'•.•ti1C loo"dI'a+ !oil.''pl'' t�1::t 1:!v:e: ha I'1Jl1y. nt'rt !rr.�•r1 t"!1�'ll til�:i . vti :tir:comd -Hulk anti .vold, .other rWi::e 'it ::It:iJ 1 t.u: '-end' retrain 1r Pull T•orce -and e'1'1'dCA.... :Jo' :a• ter-tion of sala zubdivi::;orl. n4rum.ent -or' any plan..: or snec:i•t'#c:ition. oT''aaid..'Vor1:• agreed 'to by the Prihcieial. and the' - !'ounty shall . re 1.ieeve. :in surety :rom flat,I.lity :on -this •boud; anr: con= . aunt .i s Fii:ral+••• rl•ven to' :'tiak.c 3lich ::�t'eration:. 't:�.i t;lio�,.l ruethbr nr't:lce to'. ' or con::ent"by lsure:t:vafti1;••-the Suret7 'hereby .trh vb:: •-the proviriona. or.-,' # un 111'. Civ I t •Volir± .5;!810' ?;nd hood. it neIr hound 'xit.IlOcit': rcl�zrei to and" 4ndepen1c it:-i;• •o!'• :thy act:16n a;:aiil::t Principal silicncvcr•-takcn. ` •::11MIA,- A:llt ::1+'lil:'1'Y Bel in jfi�Ii1 -ftw + : ti+ •• AT-ToRNEY--IN-FACT • IE IF $ •.* � IE ' ;e �•: F• ,��.��• �� s a = � tE �. � ••� .tt �•: �••!1° �.•tE. s' i! tt.:.!t •tF tl s• .. ' ••� ,�:.L� :;t,to of Gal Ifor rlia • • t:ount;: oT •. .)=:.. (:ACk!ltl::1,1•:iiGitl:;l'!' leX' ':JiJiii•;!'Y)•• • .: .. . . . roil _ -• -_---- 't•Jle: 1••.•r•::n I(a) w.,10.a namri:).:ishlre ::1'ttnnll :li,e`ve: 1'iir :}il.I�tii.;: :trlelMie% 1•ce/:ire:'. l:r+owm to 1:1e: to r•e ' (•� ALtophy Lrr=F Fut ti )- 1'or• t10:: pois.:on:!t ly a re':ire d be6pr•e- '1116•• nnd -hckn'd-.q1ce gdd '• S t* o M.a that: '' h0 ' ::it-ete 111Je'••nam: 1:f' t!!c Corporation 'as .'Soret;/ and. til / ^� their own nameta)• :t:: ltn:.'Att:ovnay(N)-in-Fact. : (110TAti1 A1; .::t:J'el;) t_ . y Pub!le r'nr• Coal I y •and . Stite ltiev. 2116)• 1.11-IS f 1A .-r - ,-' •�:�•�� Was,.. ..:.ti:r+%`•ti•.7s:is.iy.'rt''iw.iG�•YK+::.::•:a".:-':vti .. . RECEIVED BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY 620 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE.NEWPORT BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92660 t JUN d7 19i� . GPA 616 i. oL5Z0N GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY NUMBER VAUD ONLY IF IN RED 1 CLERK BOARD Or SUPERVISORS s COT C T CO. B - _.De u Kno All Afen by 77tese Presents, That BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California,and having its principal office in Newport Beach,Orange County,California,does by these presents make, constitute and appoint JOY ASHMORE of Burlin q a m e and State of California its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact,with full power and - l authority hereby conferred in its name• place and stead, to execute, acknowledge and deliver CONTRACT BONDS S . B.A. Guarantee Agreement) - $200 ,000.00 ; LICENSE i PERMIT 50-,000.00; MISCELLANEOUS - $50 ,000.0.0 ; CONTRACT BONDS - $50 ,000-.00; COURT B - - $50 ,000.UT "THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SHALL TERMINATE AND BE j OF NO FURTHER EFFECT AFTER DECEMBER 31 . 1978" and to bind the Company thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds were signed by the President,sealed with the corporate seal of the Company and duly attested by its Secretary,hereby ratifying and confirming all that the said Attorney(s)-in-Fact may do in the premises.Said appointment is made under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Balboa t Insurance Company at a meeting held on the 22nd day of March, 1%2. "Be It Resoh,ed, that the President.any Vice President,any Secretary or any Assistant Secretary shall be and is hereby vested ' with full power and authority to appoint any one or more suitable persons as Attorneys)-in-Fact to represent and act for and on ,behalf of the Company subject to the following provisions: "Section 1. Attorney-itt-Fact.Attorney-in-Fact maybe given full power and authority for and in the name of and on behalf of the r Company, to execute, acknowledge and deliver, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts, agreements of indemnity and other conditional or obligatory undertakings and any and all notices and documents canceling or terminating the Company's liability ! thereunder,and any such instruments so executed by any such Attorney-in-Fact shall be binding upon the Company as if signed by the President and sealed and attested by the Corporate Secretary." RARC In Witness Wlte{r'�f,�� �ut� Company has caused these presents to be signed by its V i r P P r Pc i d P n t and its corpora to be hereto ivy this 1 6 t h day of N ny Pm b P..rA.D., 19.-]. i Incorporated BALBOA 1NSURANC O P Y Feb. 6. 1948 , # * By t State of Califo is f County of OrangebRN�p On this 1 day of November A.D., 19 7 7 ,before me personally came R . L . Aldrich to me known,who,*being by me duly sworn,did depose and say,that he resides in M i s s i o n V i e j o , C a l i f o r n i a that he is -Vice President of BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY,the company described in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the seal of said Company;that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so i affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said Company; and that he signed his named thereto by like order. ►WWN►i►►W{Uuuunnununu� �-�y1.�./�/ /�C. 6.�/f . OMICIAL SEAL lop, Notary Public f JIAN M.JOHNVON e NataP►pumie.Califonle ORAH!"COUNTY _ I M � �Ot�ila Jrtlr I. tm t$,tiA I I,the undersigned Secretary of Balboa Insurance Company. hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Original Power of Attorney issued by said Company•and do hereby further certify that the said Power of Attorney is still in force and effect. And I do hereby further certify that the Certification of this Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the f authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Balboa Insurance Company at a meeting duly called and held ' on the 24th of March 1972, and that said resolution has not been amended or repealed: I "RESOLVED,that the signature of the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of this Corporation,and the seal of this Corporation, may be affixed or printed by facsimile to any certificate to a Power of Attorney of this Corporation, and that such printed facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding upon this Corporation." GIVEN under by hand the seal of said Companl LNewport Beach,California,this day of l 829E672 Secretary Microfitmad with board order IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFOR1NIA In the Matter of ) Approval of the Parcel Map of ) RESOLUTION LIQ. ..-:78/640 Subdivision MS 239-77, Brentwood Area. ) The following document was presented for Board approval this date : The Parcel Map of Subdivision -MS 239-77, property located in the Brentwood area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said Parcel Map is APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or 'easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department: Public Works r Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director - LD Director of Planning Michael 'W. Clancey 3624 Granzotto Dr Concord, .CA. • _ . . . - 0012 - RESOLUTION NO. 78/640 - '�i7 77 :'�'�0 cfi -Fi L .� •T -t' '�'.�1C ^� -�- xi 1 �•� 2! r!1'1.^s"'c.'3- ..� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/641 of improvements and declaring ) certain roads as County ) roads, Subdivision 4631, ) San Ramon Area. ) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4631 in the San Ramon area, as provided in the agreement heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement : Subdivision Date of Agreement 4631 April 12, 1977 _ (Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 005SB 02855 BCA) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as. surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 144938 dated March 16, 1977) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described roads, as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4631 filed April 13, 1977 in Book 195 of maps at page 20, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are accepted and declared to be County Roads of Contra Gcsta County: Beta Court 40/60 0.12 Omega Road 40/60 0. 10 Omega Road 32/50 0.04 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the widening of San Ramon Valley Boulevard be accepted into the County maintained road system. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978 Originating Department : Public Works Land Development Divisibn cc: Public Works Director - Maintenance ' Recorder Public Works Director - LD fames W. Leaver c/o Bryan & Murphy Associates 1233 Alpine Road Walnut Creek, CA 94596 00153 Rp(znT TTmTn*T Tr) 17,, i� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Planning Fees Changed ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/ '642 (Ord.C. §§18-2.002-1Orc�. 78-441 & Art. 26-2.28) June 27, 1978 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: 1. Pursuant to County Ordinance Code 518-2.002 (Ord. 78-44) and Article 26-2.28, beginning on July 1, 1978 the fees set forth- on the attached document entitled "CONTRA -COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR74ENT FEE SCHEDULE, JULY 1, 1978" shall be charged and paid with the sub- mission (Action Proposed) of -an application for filing or an appeal and at the same time for the preparation of any required, environmental (CEQA) assessment or impact report (EIR) . 2. In connectiori' with the fees required by this resolution, it is by the'"Board' Ordered that: (a) Environmental_ impact 'reports. Whenever the Plannifig Department determines that the. costs of preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) will exceed the minimum fees specified in the attached Schedule, it shall first require the applicant to deposit .enough money to cover the Department's estimate of the costs to pre- pare the EIR. The costs shall be paid from the fee and this deposit. If the costs exceed the fee -and deposit, the applicant shall upon initial hearing and disposition.`of the proposed action pay the excess costs to the County; if the costs are less than the fee and deposit, any excess of the deposit over the minimum fee specified in the at- tached Schedule shall be refunded to the applicant. (Ord. C. §26-2.2804.) (b) PUD Final Development Plan EIR. The Planning Director may waive part or all of the fee for planned unit district final develop- ment plan EIR if he finds that the preliminary development plan EIR "was sufficiently comprehensive to cover final development plan con sideration. (Ord. C. §26-2.2802 (b) . ) (c) Rezoning Fee. The highest filing fee specified in the attached Schedule for any rezoning application shall be charged. (d) Refunds. (a) Filing and EIR. If an application or - filing is withdrawn, the fee for filing and/or for CEQA assessment or EIR shall be refunded on applicant's request made"before the Department does substantial work on it and before any required notice is pub- lished or posted. (b) Appeals. If an appeal is dismissed, one-half the fee shall be refunded on appellant's request made before any required notice is published or posted. (Ord.C. 926-2.2808. ) PASSED on June 27, 1978, unanimously by the Supervisors present. VJW:s CC: Director of Planning County Counsel Public Works Director. County Administrator ' RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 642 : CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE, JULY 11 1978 CEQA APPEAL y ACTION PROPOSED FILING FEE ASSESSMENT EIR FEE AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE REZONING $ 300 $ 50 $ 250 $ 150 DEVELOPMENT PLAN PERMIT 1 . Multiple Family Residential Districts, 50 dwelling units or more 1,000 50 500 100 2. Commercial-Office Districts, 10 acres or more 11000 50 500 100 3. No new buildings proposed 100 50 150 75 4 . Others 500 50 250 100 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. Written Staff Interpretation 200 - - - 2. Requested General Plan Amendment 500 50 500 200 LAND USE PERMIT . 1. Mobile Home in R-District 100 50 150 75 2. Others 300 50 250 100 MINOR SUBDIVISION 400 50 250 150 OTHER SPECIAL PERMITS 300 50 250 100 PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT 1. Rezoning a. $200 + $50 per unit up to 50 units. ) b. $25 per unit, 51 to 250 units. ) ---- 50 500 500 c. $5 per unit over 250 units. ) 2 . Final Development Plan $500 if substantially same as Preliminary Dev.Plan 50 500 200 3. Final Development Plan 75% of original fee if substantially different from Preliminary Development Plan 50 500 200 4 . Tentative Subdivision Map $500 50 500 200 REZONING 1. Any Agricultural District to any Single Family Residential District 300 50 500 150 2 . Any Single Family District to another Single Family Residential District 300 50 500 150 3. Any District to Multiple. Family Residential District 1,000 50 500 500 4 . ' .Any District to any Commercial Office or Industrial District 11000. 50 500 500 5 . Any Other' District Not Covered Above 500 50 500 250 SUBDIVISION (MAJOR) a. $200 + $50 per lot. up to 50 lots. ) b. $25 per lot, 51 to 250 lots. ) ---- 50 500 200 c. $5 per lot over 250 lots. ) VARIANCE PERMIT 100 50 150 75 OTHER APPEALS NOT COVERED ABOVE <:'b. From Zoning Administrator - - 75 �. From Planning Commission or Board of Appeals - - 75 CA Vq J t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT In the Matter of Approval of Final ) Environmental Impact Report and ) 'Zone Plan Amendment No. 6 to the } RESOLUTION NO. 78/_643 Flood Control Zone 3B Adopted ) Project, Concord Area ) Work Order 8684-7520 ) ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT: PART 1 GENERAL On December 16, 1954, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Walnut Creek Improvement Project for Flood Control Zone 3B. Since thanvarious amendments- - and supplements have updated the Project. In 1970, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the City of Concord and the Soil Conserva- tion Service requested the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to consider incorporating improvements to Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks into the Corps of Engineers. Walnut- Creek Project. In 1977, the Corps completed their Design Study for Lower Pine and_. Galindo Creeks and received authorization to proceed with preparation of detailed plans for these improvements. The Zone 3B Advisory Board on April 27, 1978; passed a motion recommending to the Board of Supervisors that the Zone 3B Adopted Project be amended to refl eco Che improvements proposed by the Corps of Engineers. On May 2, 1978 the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, after a . public hearing on the draft Environmental Impact Report for the Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Channel Improvements, determined that the Environmental Impact Report ww adequate. The City of Concord has found the Project to be in conformance with the City General Plan. , .4; PART II ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Procedure WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, together with the State's administrative "Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Act...." require the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports for certain public projects; and The District is considering Zone Plan Amendment No.-6 to the current Zone Plan for Flood Control Zone 3B for the Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Channel Improvement Project; and 10 The County determined that an Environmental Impact Report was required for the Lower Pine Creek and Galindo Creek Channel Improvement Project; and Staff prepared the following environmental documents entitled "Environ- mental Impact Report: Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Channel Improvements for the Walnut Creek Project," and "Response Document Environmental Impact Report: Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Channel Improvements of the Walnut Creek Project," which are to be considered in connection with the proposed Zone 3B Plan Amendment. These documents included responses to all the written comments received. Staff transmitted said documents to the Planning Commission on or before May 2, 1978, and thereafter made theca available to those interested. 00155 RESOLUTION NO. 78/643 On May 2, 1978, the County Planning Commission, in its capacity as the County's hearing body for Environmental Impact Reports, according to the County's adopted processing procedures, held a public hearing on the Draft EIR at which time all wishing to speak were afforded the opportunity; and on May 2, 1978, the County Planning Commission determined that the Environmental Documents described above constituted an adequate Final Environmental Impact Report and-certified that it was completed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, State .and County guidelines; and State guidelines 'and recent court decisions provide that the deciding body should not merely consider the Environmental Impact Report in taking action on a project but should justify its choice in view of its significant impacts and account for the disposition of identified mitigation measures as well. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors, hereby approves the certification of its hearing body, the County Planning Commission, that the Environmental Documents described above constitute a Final Environmental Impact Report, and that it was completed in accordance with the California Environ- mental Quality Act, State and County guidelines; and FURTHER, that the Board having reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report, finds that it is an adequate basis for making a decision on the project; and FURTHER, that the Board, having studied the significant impacts of the project and possible mitigation measures, as described in the Final Environmental Impact Report, accordingly, makes the following findings and gives the following directions: Significant Impacts FURTHER, the Board concurs with the County Planning Commission's findings that the. following significant impacts would result from implementation of the project and adopts the associated mitigation measures to minimize those impacts to the greatest possible degree. (.CONVERSION OF THE MAN!%AnE EARTH CHANNEL'FROM MONUMENT BOULEVARD TO THE BART TRACK; TO a CONCRt c-LINE►? CHAUN EL iW-HICH FORECLOSES OTHER PUBLIC USE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THIS PORTION OF THE CREEK The concrete-lined channel will incorporate landscaping to provide wildlife and aesthetic values to the project. . The City of Concord has already adopted a Trails Plan that calls for trail development on all covered portions of Pine and Galindo Creeks within the city limits. The Board finds that conversion of the earth channel to a concrete-lined channel will affect public use. The Board further finds, that mitigation measures, such As providing the cover over large portions of Pine and Galindo Creeks, including trails and landscaping, together with the landscaping along the open channels, including a possible trails system, wall enhance rather than foreclose public use. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to coordinate with the Corps of Engineers and the City of Concord the development and implementation of a landscaping and trail plan for the covered portions of channel and a landscaping and possible trail plan for the open portions of the channel. 2. REMOVAL OF AN ESTIMATED 34 TREES IN EXCESS OF 15° IN DIAMETER The project would result in the destruction of these trees, but there are many trees within the work limits that will be saved. Also, the implementation of landscaping, as planned by the Corps of Engineers, will return to the area a large part of the vegetation that had to be removed for the channel work. The Board finds, that, although some trees are to be removed by the the channel work, the mitigation measures such as saving trees within the work limits by marking them on the construction plans and in the field, and by implementing a landscaping program along the new channel , that a vegetative comm. unity will eventually be re-established. -2- Ua15 r RESOLUTION NO. 78/543 The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to coordinate with the Corps of Engineers that, within the project limits, as many trees as possible be saved. The Board further directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to work closely with the Corps of Engineers and the city of. Concord in the development of a com- prehensive landscaping plan. 3. FENCED OPEN CHANNEL AREAS ALONG PINE CREEK FROM ERICKSON ROAD TO THE BART TRACKS MAY ACT AS A BARRIER BE 14EEN ADJACENT SEGMENTS OF THE COM-MUNITY The fences along the open channel improvements are a necessary safety measure. The existing bridges between the adjacent segments of the community will be replaced or modified to conform to the new channel. The new rectangular channel will make construction of new bridges, in case this is desired in the future, much easier. The Board finds that the existing creek or the new channel may be con- sidered as a barrier between adjacent segments of the community. The Board further finds, that the mitigation measures, such as constructing a channel cover over a large part of Pine and Galindo Creeks, and the increased ease with which new bridges, if needed, can be constructed across the new channel , are such that the sense of the new channel being a barrier will disappear in time. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to work with-the City of Concord in coordinating provisions for additional access across the creek if.the need for such access arises. 4. THE HAZARD OF DR014NING OR FALLING INTO AN EMPTY-vdANNEL The chance of falling and/or drowning in the open channel will be greatly reduced by the installation of a 6-foot chain link fence. In addition to that;*a 2-cable, 45-inches high safety railing will be installed along the top of the channel . The Board finds that a safety hazard exists when the open'-channel is con- structed, but that this hazard is reduced to a minimal level with the installation of a 6-foot chain link fence and safety railing. ;he 3oard directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to incorporate in the project plans the 6-foot chain link fence and safety railing. 5. POTENTIAL TEMPORARY WATER, AIR AND NOISE POLLUTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS The project will cause an increase in water and air pollution and will cause an increase in noise levels. The Board finds that these construction effects are short-term and that they can be minimized. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to include the following in planning the project: A. Require construction activities to incorporate an adequate channel bypass to route creek flows through or around construction work to maintain water quality. B. Utilize water or chemical bonding agents to..reduce dust emissions from disturbed soil surfaces. C. Require all construction equipment to be proper+y maintained and utilize mufflers and noise suppressors on exhaust systems. D. Require contractors to meet specified equipment emission level standards. E. Require any mechanical equipment which may have to be operated between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (such as dewatering pumps) to be provided with noise deadening acoustical• shieldfng. F. Restrict construction operations to the normal working hours on weekdays only. -3- 00158 RESOLUTION NO. 78/643 6. THE UPSTREAM END OF THE GALINDO CREEK COVERED CHANNEL CROSSES THE ACTIVE CONCORD FAULT WITHIN AN ALQUIST-PRI LO ACT SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE. THE FAULT IS KNOWN TO BE SUBJECT TO CREEP Portion of the proposed covered channel for Galindo Creek appears to pass over the fault, although the exact location of the fault has not been determined. The Board finds that there is a chance that the proposed channel crosses the fault. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to work with the Corps of Engineers and the City of Concord to determine where Galindo Creek crosses the Concord fault and consider crossing this area with a flexible channel such as an earth-lined channel.. 7. THE POTENTIAL EXISTS FOR EXCAVATION OPERATIONS TO UNCOVER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES An archaeological investigation was conducted which did not identify any archaeological resources in the project area, however, due to the riparian nature of the area the potential for the existence of such sites is present. The Board finds that the potential for archaeological sites within the project area exists. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to treat the discovered previously unknown site in accordance with applicable State and Federal laws.. The Board directs the ex officio Chief Engineer to stop .all construction activity within a 30 meter radius of any archaeological remains encountered during construction operations and a qualified archaeologist be retained to assess the importance of the discovery and to reconnend appropriate mitigating measures. Statement of Overriding Consideration FURTHER, the Board recognizes that the project contained in the Final Environmental Impact"'Report will have certain environmental effects which have been only partially mitigated or which have not been mitigated. These effects are as follows: The tempora rj disruption of wildlife habitat; the short term effect of increased noise and dust levels during construction; and the consumption of energy in the form of construction materials and fuel for construction equipment and vehicles. The Board finds the project is justified by the following statement of overriding consideration: This project alternative was deemed best when all impacts were considered. There is a great long range economic and social benefit attributable to flood pro- tection and subsequent removal of areas from the HUD flood hazard areas. For these reasons, the Board finds that these overriding social and economic needs outweigh the physical impacts which may be attributable to the proposed project. The individual physical impacts are generally not significant or will be mitigated individually. The project as proposed will correct,the,existing significant negative impact of flooding. PART 111 ZONE PLAN AMENDMENT On May 23, 1978, the Board of SuPervisors, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, duly passed and adopted a resolution concerning the adoption of project Amendment No. 6 to the Zone 3B Project in the Pine and Galindo Creeks WAtershed area within said District. Pursuant to said resolution the Board fixed 9:30 o'clock a.m. on June 27, 1978, in the chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Administration Building, Martinez, California, as the time and place of hearing on the question of the adoption of the proposed Amendment No. 6 to the Zone 3B Project. -4- 001`59 RESOLUTION NO. 78/643 It appears from the Affidavit of Publication, on file with the Clerk of the Board, that the Notice and Resolution for the adoption of Zone Plan Amendment No. 6 were published, pursuant to Government Code 5 6060" once a week for two (2) successive weeks in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation, published in said Zone 38, and that publication was completed at least seven (7) days before the date of the hearing in compliance with the provisions of Section 11 of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act. FURTHER, copies of the Notice and Resolution were forwarded to the cities of Concord, Lafayette, Martinez, Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek. At 9:30 o'clock a.m. on June 27, 1978, in the chambers of the Board of Supervisors, Martinez, California, the Board met for the purpose of holding a hearing on the adoption of the proposed Amendment No. 6 to the Zone 38 Project. During said hearing comments, both written and oral , were heard and considered. Prior to the conclusion of said hearing written protests in the form and number sufficient to prevent the adoption of project Amendment No. 6 were not filed, and any protests received were overruled and denied. This Board, as the ex officio Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, resolves that the Engineer's Report, dated May 16, 1978, on the proposed project Amendment'No. .6 to the Zone 3B Project is hereby adopted and approved as an amendment to the-project for Zone 3B. The Director of Planning is hereby instructed to file a Notice of Determination on the Environmental Impact Report for'thz Lower Pine and Galindo Creeks Channel Improvement Project and Amendment No. 6 to the Zone 3B Project. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. i CEXURED Copy I certify that this is a full, true & corTeCt copy or the original document which is on file In my offioe,•"` and that it was passed & adopted by the Board of Srviro upaof CD:1Cra Costa County. California,-ou' the date shown. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON. County-7' Cierk&ex-officio Cleric-of said Board of ftPecvisors, by Deputy Cler -- n JUN 2 7 1978 M. VA•N ., ° y . Originator: Public Works Department Flood Control Planning • and Design cc: Public Works Director Flood Control County Administrator Director of Planning (5) -5- 00160 RESOLUTION 78/ ' - - IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY STORM DRAINAGE DISTRICT in the Matter of Dissolving ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 644 Contra Costa County Storm ) (West's Mat. C. App. Drainage District Zone 29A ) §§69-38.4 through Oakley Area ) 69-38.6) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Storm Drainage District RESOLVES THAT: On March 14, 1978 the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District passed its Resolution. No. 78/222 annexing the area within Contra Costa County Storm Drainage .District Zone 29A to Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water .Consei-vation District Drainage Area 290. On May 16, 1973. this Board adopted its Resolution of Intention No. 78/442 announcing its intention to dissolve Drainage Zone -29A. On June 27, 1978, pursuant to said Resdlution - No. 78/442, this Board held a hearing on the question of dissolving Drainage Zone 29A. At the time ,and.p.lace fixed for said hearing before this Board, all written and oral objections presented concerning the dissolution were considered. It appears from the affidavits of publication on file with this Board that all notices required to be given for such hearing have been duly and regularly given and all procedures to.be. followed have been followed, all in accordance with Section 38.4 of the Contra Costa County Storm Drainage District Act and in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 78/442. This Board hereby certifies that the Notice of Exemption submitted to it by the Planning Commission has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and that the Board has reviewed the information contained therein- This Board directs the Planning Director to ' file the Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. This Board hereby finds that Drainage Area 290 exists as an alternate public entity to perform services for which Drainage Zone 29A was formed and that the need for Drainage Zone 29A no longer- exists and hereby DISSOLVES Contra Costa County Storm Drainage Zone 29A. This.Board also , hereby CONVEYS all real property interests it owns-within District Zone 29A to 'the.Cao itxa Costa County Flood Control and FTater Conservation District. PASSED on June 27, 1978 unanimously by Supervisors present. Originating Department: Public Works Department Flood Control Planning and Design cc: Public Works Director Flood Control County Administrator County Assessor County Auditor-Controller County Treasurer-Tax Col !ector Director of Planning c1 RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 644 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CAI,IFOPNIA AS EX-OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVA`£'ION DISTRICT In the *:atter of Accepting ) Conveyance of Property ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 645 Located in Former Contra ) Costa County Storm Drainage ) D ) (West' s Pater Code Annendix District Zone 29A, Oakley ) Section 63-5) Area ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County as the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District RESOLVES THAT: On June 27, 1978, by Resolution X78/ 644 , the Board of Super- visors of the Contra Costa County Storm Drainage District dissolved Contra Costa County Storm Drainage Zone 29A and conveyed all of its property in said zone to the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. This Board hereby ACCEPTS the property conveyed by the, above- mentioned resolution. PASSED on June 27, 1978 unanimously by Supervisors present. Originating Department: Public Works - Flood Control Planning & Design cc: Public Works Director Flood Control County Administrator County Assessor County Auditor-Controller County Treasurer-Tax Collector Director of Planning RESOLUTION NO. 78/ 645 00162 1n IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Completion of improvements ) RESOLUTION NO., 78/646 in Subdivision 4656, ) San Ramon Area. , ) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4656, .San Ramon area, as provided in the agreement heretofore, approvedby this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following; subdivision have been completed for the purpose . of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement Subdivision Date of' Agreement 4656 February .22, 1977' (Imperial Savings & Loan Association) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as .surety,. (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 143989 dated February' 10, 1977) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described .roads, as shown and dedicated for public use on the Parcel Map of Subdivision 4656 filed February 23, 1977 in Book 193 of maps at page 20, Official Records of Contra Costa, .State of California, are accepted and declared to be County Roads of Contra Costa County: Renada Place 32/50 .07 Bolivar Place 32/50 .07 Arboles Place 32/50 .07 PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director - Maintenance Recorder Public Works Director - LD Planning Director Imperial Savings & Loan Association c/o Larwin Northern California, Inc . 6500 Village Parkway Dublin, CA 94566 W. W. Dean P.O. Box 5527 San Mateo, CA 94402 OU-13 RESOLUTION NO. 78/646 , Lr" - /'� IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of } Completion of improvements ) and declaring certain roads ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/647 at County roads, ) Subdivision 4819, ) San Ramon Area. ) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4819, San Ramon area, as provided in the -agreement heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4819 July 27, 1976 (Donald Lawrie -Joseph R. Barber - David B. Henderson) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 137926 dated July 13, 1976) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4 . 406 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Silver Chief Way 32/52 .08 the hereinafter described roads, as shown_ and dedicated for public use on. the Parcel Map of Subdivision 4819 filed July 28, 1976 in Book 188 of Maps at page ?, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, is accepted and declared to be a County Road of Contra Costa County. .PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department : Public Works Land Development Division cc : Public Works Director - Maintenance Recorder Public Works Director - LD Planning Director Donald Laurie, et al P. 0. Box 806 Danville, CA RESOLUTION NO. 78/647 00.161 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA, COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of ) Completion of improvements ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/648 and declaring - ) E1 Dorado Drive a County Road,- San oad,San Ramon Area. ) - The Public Works Director has' 'notified this Board that improvements on El Dorado Drive, San Ramon Area, have been satisfactorily completed pursuant to a Road'Improvement Agreement heretofore- approved by this . Board on February 22, 1977; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements on El Dorado ` Drive have been satisfactorily completed for the purpose of establishing a` terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Fund Improvement Agreement: Road Date of Agreement .r El Dorado Drive February 22, 1977 (Imperial Savings & Loan Association) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 143989 dated February 103 1977) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section, 94-4.406 of he ,. Ordinance Code BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE that El Dorado Drive as shown and dedicated for public use on the Final Map of Subdivision 3843 filed May 23, 1973 in Book 157 of Maps, at page 31, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, ;is accepted and declared to be a County Road of Contra Costa County: PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public Works Director - Maintenance Recorder Public Works Director - LD Planning Director Imperial Savings & Loan Association c/o Larwin Northern California, Inc. 6500 Village Parkway - Dublin, CA-94566 001s RESOLUTION NO. 78/648 1 V'Ar WHEN RECORDED, RETURN RECORDED AT REQUEST OF OWNER TO CLERK BOARD OF at O'clock M. SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Records J. R. OL SSON, County Recorder Fee Official BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Accepting and Giving ) RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE Notice of Completion of Contract for ) and NOTICE OF COMPLETION Franciscan Way Culvert (C.C. §§ 3086, 3093) Project No. 1655-4435-665-78 ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/649 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on April 3, 1978 contracted with William A. Smith 37 Barcelona Court, San Ramon, California 94583 ' Name and Address of Contractor for constructing a storm drain inlet, curb and gutter, installing corrugated steel pipe arch culvert and placing A.C. overlay at the intersection of Franciscan Uay'and Sunset Drive in the Kensington area, Project No. 1655-4435-665-78 with Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, San Francisco as surety, Name of Bonding Company for work to be performed on the grounds of the County: and The Public Works Director reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of May 5, 1978 ; • Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the County Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for said contract. PASSED AND ADOPTED ON June 27, 1978 CERTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution and acceptance duly adopted and entered on the minutes of this Board's meeting on the above date. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: JUN 2 7 1978 J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk & at Martinez, California ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk M: VANNUCCHJ Originator: Public Works Department, Construction Division cc: Record and return Contractor Auditor 001 Pubic Works RESOLUTION N0. 78/649 WHEN RECORDEDR,—,im- j,N r 1PT1V ri AT r,��tir,�:S�. �r�• �:TO CLERK DOI.-RD 01,111 , at o�clockSUPERVISORS M Contra Costa County Records Jr. R. OLSSOIi, County Recorder Tee S Official WARD OF SUPERVISORS$ CONTRA COSTA C0101 TY, CAL=I- In the matter of Accepting and Giving RESOI,UTIOF 0. ACC ? n?TCF _ Notice of completion of Contract• frith ,and N=OTICE 01-1 COMPLETIOT: (C:C. 030,96, 3Q03) Budget Line Item 873-2282 RESOLUTION 110_ 78/650 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County P.ESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on February 22, 1978 contracted 1:ith Kal-Co Landscapinq, 5 Kimberley Drive, Moraga, CA 94556 name and Address of Contractor for landscape construction of the Danville Off-Street' Parking District • e itli' Fremont Indemnity Company. • as- surety, Mame of Bordin- Company for work to be perf orIIed or. the grounds of the County; and The Dublin. VTorks Director reports that said N;ork has been inspected and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of -June 27. 1978 ; The-refore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Coua ty Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract. • Time extension to date of acceptance is granted as the Contractor was delayed due to weather and utility problems PASSED AND ADOPTED Oil June 27, 1978 , • CERTIFICATION and ITRIT ICATIO,T 1 certify that the foregoing is a true and cors;et copy of a resolu-- tion and a.cceD-ance duly adopted and erte.red on the minutes of This Board' s meetir_ on the above date. I declare under penalty oj perjury that tAhe foregaina is true and correct. .,fUN2 7 1978J. R. OLSSW , county Cl arc & . at Martinez, California e� officio Clerk •of the Boa—_d _ . c*'u •y L:rfM, VANNUCCHI cc: Recora alare'�urn Cosi Lractor 00167 Auditor ). abl.i.c horks �� 78/650 Admi.ni.:;trator T►s.SOL11q,10r:r 1.0. . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 UL In the Matter of Finance Committee Report on Retirement Contribution _ Rates. The Board on June 13, 1978 having referred to its Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden:) •a communi- cation from Mr. B. 0. Russell, Retirement Administrator, Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association, citing recommendations of the Retirement Board with respect to funding of the retirement system for the 1978-1979 fiscal year and following three fiscal .years; and The Finance Committee this day having advised that after reviewing the retirement system financing with Mr. Russell and county staff in regular meeting to which employee organization representatives were invited, it had determined that implementation of the recommendations of the Retirement Board is required to . assure adequate system .funding, and said Committee having expressed concern over the increase in county and employee costs which will occur in the three fiscal years comznencing July 1, 1979; and The Finance Committee having recommended approval of the recommendations of the Retirement Board as specified in the memo- randum of the Retirement Administrator dated June 5, 1978, and having urged that actions which will diminish retirement costs be vigorously pursued in the interest of both taxpayers and employees; and The Board members having considered the matter, IT IS , ORDERED that the recommendation of the Finance Committee is APPROVED and Resolution No. 78/714 implementing revised employer and employee retirement contribution rates and interest assumption during- the period July 1, 1978 through June 30, 1982 is ADOPTED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor CC: Retirement Administrator affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 Director of Personnel County Auditor-Controller County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By_,, 4r, . Deputy Clerk Vera Nelson nnnn `JU16J H-24 4/77 15m R. The Board of Supervisors Contra James County Clerk Clerkan and (� } Ex Officio Clerk of the Board County Administration Building l os a Mrs.Geraldine Russell P.O.Box 911 Chief Clerk Martinez,California 94553 County (415)372-2371 James P.Kenny-Richmond 1st District Nancy C.Fanden-Martinez 2nd District Robert I.Schroder-Lafayette RECEIVED 3rd District � , JN Warren N.Boggess-Concord L �' 4th District Eric H.Hasseiune-Pittsburg June 27, 19 78 , 5th District J iUN1 40,c*71057$ J: O1550iV REPORT tx Iso o: supe sora OF cosr . ----P-......... eputy FINANCE COMMITTEE ON RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION RATES On June 13, 1978 the Board referred to the Finance Committee a communication from B. O. Russell, Retirement Administrator, citing recommendations of the Retirement Board with respect to funding of the retirement system for the 1978-1979 fiscal year and following three fiscal years. The recommendations were based on the actuarial report on the retirement system submitted by the firm of Coates., Herfurth & England on ,February 10, 1978 and have been the subject of two Retirement Board meetings with the system's actuaries, representatives of employee organizations and of county administration. The Finance Committee met on June 26, 1978 and reviewed retire- ment system financing with Mr. Russell, and with county staff, and determined that implementation of the recommendations is required to assure adequate system funding. The Committee is concerned, however, over the increase in county and employee costs which will occur in the three fiscal years commencing July 1, 1979, and mitigation of .these costs lead to a discussion concerning the activities of the Task Force which has been established to review the County's retire- ment system in relationship to social security. The Committee was advised that the initial report of this Task Force will be submitted in the next few days, and that if developments occur as planned, the Board and employees may anticipate the availability of a less costly retirement program beginning July 1, 1979. As a result of its review, the Committee concluded that it had no real alternative but to recommend implementation of the recom- mendations of the Retirement Board as specified in the memorandum of the Retirement Administrator dated June 5, 1978. It also urges, however, that actions which will diminish retirement costs be vigorously pursued in the interest of both taxpayers and employees. Employee organizations were invited to send a representative to the Finance Committee meeting on this matter and Mr. Henry Clarke of th�ontra Costa County Employees Association Local 1 did in fact at nd. / E. H. HASSELTINE N. C. F DEN v �I Supervisor, District V Super - or, District II Microfi{med with board order - V t . CONTRA COSTA COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION Inter-Office Meno RECEIVED T0: Robert Schroder, Chairman JUN 6 1978 Board of Supervisors J. R. OISSON ARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Benjamin 0. Russell, Retirement Administrator C STA Co. ..Dopa Implementation of Actuarial Recommendations for Employer and SUBJECT: Employee Retirement and Cost of Living Contribution Rates and for Interest Assumptions DATE: June 5, 1978 ' This memorandum follows two public meetings with the Retirement Board's actuaries, Coates, Herfurth & England and a special Retirement Board meeting held May 17, 1978. 'Notices of all meetings were sent to all employers participating in the Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association's retirement system and to all organizations known to be officially representing employees of these employers. The meetings were well attended by both management and employee representatives, . especially from the County. The Retirement Board recommendations for contributions and for interest assump- tions and the time table for their implementation were accepted by all manage- ment and empjc?-ea- �presa�-:`.fives at the %ay 17, 1978 meeting. -Several manage- ment employee representatives spoke in favor of the recommendations; no one opposed them. In _summary, the Board of Retirement essentially adopted the actuary's recommen- dations that the Board adopt a stronger funding method, which assumes a continuing inflation, and that the new method be phased into effect over a four year period. In order to reduce the adverse effect upon the County budget and employee relations, the Board adopted, effective July 1, 1978, an alternative to the first year rates . and interest assumption included in the stronger funding method. This alternative, which was approved by the actuary, results in retaining the employer and employee contribution rates at about their present levels (except for a significant one year reduction in employer rates for safety members) while transferring $3,665,000 from "surplus" monies in the retirement fund to the County Advance Reserves. Future emnlover retirement cost of living contribution rates,then, will be as follows as compared with rates presently in effect: General Members Retirement Cost of"Living Present Rates 6.52% (First $3"50 monthly salary) 2,215% of base pay 9.800 (Excess over $350 monthly salary) Effective 7-1-78 6.51% (First $350 monthly salary) 2.29% of base pay 9,77% (Excess over $350 monthly salary) 00170 0 -e- ' MiQr01i1Mgd with board order General Members (continued) Retirement Cost of Living Effective 7-1-79 7.63% (First $350 monthly salary) 2.36% of base pay 11.44 (Excess over $350 monthly salary) Effective 7-1-80 8.17% (First $3S0 monthly salary) 2.43% of base pay 12.26% (Excess over $350 monthly salary) Effective 7-1-81 8.710 (First $350 monthly salary) 2.50% of base pay 13.07% (Excess over $350 monthly salary) Safety Members Retirement Cost of Living 'Present Rates 16.1% of salary 2.215% of base pay Effective 7=1=78 14.83% of salary 2.29% of base pay Effective 7-1-79 17.22% of salary 2.36%,of base pay Effective 7-1-80 17.78% of salary 2.43% of'base pay Effective 7-1-81 18.35% of salary 2.S0% of base pay. Interest Assumption Present 6% Effective 7-1-78 6% Effective 7-1-79 and later 6h% The employee retirement and cost of living contribution rates effective July 1, 1978 will be a bit higher, due to a one-half of one percent increase in the cost of living rate. Future employee rates will rise significantly for employees who entered the retirement system at lower ages and less so for employees who 'entered the system at higher ages. Here are sample employee retirement and cost of living rates under the Board of Retirement's recommendation: General Members Safety'Members Entry Age Entry-Age Date 25 35 45 21 2S 30 Present Rates 7.88% 9.48% 11.70% 9.41% 10.05% 11.14% Effective 7-1-78 7.90 9.50 11.72 9.43 j'QGIp 7T1 16 General Members (continued) Safety Members(continued) Entry Ave Entry Age Date 25 35 45 21 25 30 Effective 7-1-79 9.34% 10.34% 11.78% 11.15% 11.52% 12.26% Effective 7-1-80 10.06 10.77 11.82 12.03 12.26 12.82 Effective 7-1-81 10.79 11.19 11.86 12.90 13.00 13.37 All general member rates are on salaries in excess of $350 monthly. The rates ars one-third lesson salaries through $350 monthly. In accordance with Government Code Section 31453, these Board of Retirement — recommendations are forwarded for your approval pursuant to Government Code Section 31454. A proposed Board of Supervisors resolution is enclosed for your use. . i. BOR:suz r cc: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator Donald Bouchet, County Auditor-Controller John Clausen, County Counsel Charles J. Leonard, Director of Personnel 00172 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, Sate of California In the matter of approving ) Contribution Rates and Interest ) to be Credited for Contra ) RESOLUTION NO. 78/714 Costa County Employees Retirement ) Association ) Pursuant to Government Code Section 31457 and on recommendation of the Board of the Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association, BE IT RESOLVED that the following contribution and interest rates are approved to be effective as indicated: I. Retirement Contributions A. County and District Rates 1. General Members Effective 7-1-78 First $350 monthly compensation: 6.51% Compensation in excess of $350 monthly: 9.77% Effective 7-1-79 First $350 monthly compensation: 7.63% Compensation in excess of $350 monthly: 11 .449 Effective 7-1-80 First $350 monthly compensation: 8.17% Compensation in excess of $350 monthly: 12.26% Effective 7-1-81 First $350 monthly compensation.; 8.71%. Compensation in excess of $35G, monthly: 13.0.7% 2. Safety Members ` Effective 7-1-75 Total Compensation 14.83% Effective 7-1-79 Total Compensation 17.22% Effective 7-1-80 Total Compensation 17.78% Effective 7-1-81 Total Compensation 18,35% B. Employee Rates See attached sheets for details on both General Members and Safety Members. II. Cost of Living Program Contributions A. County and District Rates Effective 7-1-78 2.29% of earnable compensation Effective 7-1-79 2.36% of earnable compensation Effective 7-1-80 2.43% of earnable compensation Effective 7-1-81 2.50% of earnable compensation B. Employee Rates See attached sheets for details. III, Interest to be Credited to Reserves Effective 7-1-78: 6% Effective 7-1-79 and later: 6 1/2% PASSED ON June 27,1978, unanimously by the Supervisors present. cc: Retirement Administrator Director of Personnel County Auditor-Controller , County Counsel [► County Administrator RESOLUTION NO. - 78/714 W" ""low .. .�.. Section VI(vii) COt -EY OF CONTRA COSTA General Members' Contribution Rates* PRESENT Section 31676.11 Based UDOA 6% Interest** Effective 07-01-7$ Excess of First $350 Monthly Entry of Monthly Comnensatiorr Age Compensation Over $350 - 16 3.30% -4.94% 17 3-32 4-98 18 3.34 5.02 19 3.37 5.06 • 20 3.41 5.12 21 3.45 5.18 22 3.49 5.24 23 3-54 5.31 24 3-59 5.39 25 3.65 5.47 26 3.71 5.56 27 3.77 5-66 28 3-84 . 5.76 29 3.91 a 5.86 30 3.98 5.97 31 4-06 6.08 32 4.13 6.20 33 4.22 6=32 34 4.30 6.46 35 4.39 . : - 6-58, 36 4.48 6.172-- 37 :72_37 4.57 6:86 38 4.67 " 7.00 39 4.77 7.15 *As a percentage of salary (full contribution rates) . ="*Includes a salary scale reflecting merit and longevity and 3/4n inflation. 2/10/78, -66- COATIS, HERFURTH 8c ENGLAND. ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS QJ■�17d.tib Section VI(vii) COUNTI OF C0.'N3'IP_.. COST, General IMembers' Contribution Rates* PRESENT Section 31676.11 T Based Upon 6Z Interest_* (Continued) Excess of, First $350 Monthly �atr^ of Monthly Compensation ate Comoensation Over $350 �Lo 4.87% 7.302 41 4.97 7.4,6 T2 5.08 7:62 43 5.19 7:78 41. 5.30 7.95 45 5.42 8.12 L6 5.53 8.310- 475.66 8.48 '8 5.78 8-.67 49 5.91 8.86- 50 6.04 9.06 51 6.17 9.26 _ 52 6.31 9.46 53 6.45 9.68 - 54 S Over 6.59 9.89 t ` *As a percentage o2 salary (Lull contribution rates) .. 1 : **Includes a salary scale -reflecting merit and longevity and 3/4 inflation. 2/10/78 -67- n ry� COATI-IS. HERFURTH $ ENGLAND.ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS. - _ ! Section VI(ix) COLLA' 0- CONTRA COSTA Cost-of-Living Contribution Rates* PRESENT BASIS General ,`tembers Interest- at 6%*=`• Effective 07-01-78 .Excess of First $350 _ Monthly_ Lncry of Aonthly Compensation ARe Compensation Over S350 16 1.46% 2.19% 17 1.47 2.21 18 1.48 2.23 19 1.50 2.25 20 1.51 2.27 21 1.53 2.30 22 1.55 2.32 23 1.57 2.36 24 1.59 2.39 25 1.62 2.43 26 1.65 2.47 27 1.67 2.51 23 1.70 -2.56 29 1.73 2.60 30 1.77 2.65 31 1.80 2.70 32 1.83 2.75 33 1.87 2:80 34 1.91 2.87 35 1.95 2.92 36 1.99 - '2.98 . 37 2.03 3.04 38 2.07 3:11 39 2.12 3.17 _ �G4.37� of basic rates. `T_rc;ules a salary scale reflecting merit and longevity and 3/4; inflation. -72- TIMM COATS. HERFURTH ENGLAND. ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS y Section VI(L-0 ;Ov' TT 0: CONTRA CCS'TA Cost-of-Living Contribution Rates* PRESENT BASIS General Members (Continued) Interest at 6X'* Excess of First $350 :Monthly Earzy of 'Monthly Compensation sze Compensation Over S350 40 2.16% 3.24% 41 2.21 3.31 42 2.25 - 3.38 . 43 2.30 3.45 ,. . 44 2.35 3.53 45 2.40 3.60 46 2.45 3.68 47 2.51 3.76 48 2.56 3.85 49 2.62 3.93 50 2.68 4.02 51 2.74 4.11 52 2.79 4.20 53 2_86 4.30 54 Over 2.92 4.39 *44.3773 of basic rates_ - **Includes a salary scale reflecting merit and longevity - and 3/4;� inflation_ 2/10/78 F! -73- 001 COATlS. lRFURTN $ E1�Gt 1N0.ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS COnTKA COSTO COUhTT '71SCcLL&4iJU4 ML03i%S GtAIL0 CnPLOTEr CJNitIeJIlUN RATE3 45 Oi 711.'76 YELR 2 EtPa=C'.cU AS 4 PEaCiftTAGi Oi NGNTiLY COHPikSATIO4 Effectlrw 07-01-79 3ASLC RATE C.O.L. RAU TOTAL R4fE AT.- Ud02 1353 nv:R /3:J U4JE4 6350 UVEB %350 uNOEA 135L OVER 1350 ... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 16 i.Z5 Z 6.33 Z 1.76 Z Z.64 z 6.01 Z 9.OZ z 17 4.26 t 6.39 Z 1.76 Z 2.64-z 6.02 Z 9.03 1 18 4.27 t 6.43 t 1.77 z 2.65 z 6.C4 Z 9.06 z 19 4.28 1 6.42 Z 1.77 Z Z.66 1 6.L5 z 9.09 z 20 4.30 t A.45 t 1.16 t 2.67 z 6.C6 c 9.12_ t 21 4.31 t 1.79 z Z.26 9 6.10- t 9.15 z 22 4.33 Z 6.50 t 1.79 i Z.69 L 6.12 L 9.19 Z 23 4.3c t 6.54 Z 1.61 z Z.71 z 6.17 t 9.25: Z " Z4 4.3b t 5.57 z 1.41 Z Z.7Z-1 6.19 Z 9.29 Z 22 4.41 t - n.S2 L 1.83 4 Z.74 Z 6.24 L 9:36 Z 26 4.45 t 5.61 L l.dr Z 2.76 Z 6.2o t 9.43 1 Z7 4.iv Z 6.7? L 1.85 t Z.78 z 6.34 Z 9.51 Z 26 4.53 t 6.79 C 1.01 Z Z.il z 6.4C -Z 9.04 z 29 4.57 Z 5.95 z 1.89 z -2.83 z 6.46 L 9.68 1 3G i.6i z 7+.02 Z 1.91 z 2.86 z o.52'.z :,a.7• L 31 4.60 L 6.9Y L 1.43 Z 2.89 z 6.59 z 9.do z 3Z 4.71 t 7.07 C 1.95 Z 2.92 z 6.0t Z 9.99 z 33 4.77 t 7-15. 1.97 z 2.96 1 6.74 Z 10.11 t 34 --d3 t r z4 L 2.3C Z 3.JG z 0.63 z 10.24 z 35 i.bb t 7.3Z t 2.04 L 3.33 t 6.9C Z' 10.35 Z • COST-OF-L1YlYG d4TES ARE E30AL TO 41.372 OF dASIC WES 00178 C(IYTRA COSTA COUNTY MISCELLANtISUS NtmScRS CAAatO EIPLOVEE CONTRI9UTION AAtiS AS OF 7/117b YEAR 2 FXPRESSED AS A PEFCENTAGE OF MOITNLr CLIA?cNSATIUN w#ass#w M#rs#s.rirwsas.r.##s�sw.wN##�#�####♦wwN a## BASIC RATE C.O.L. RATE TOTAL RATE AGE UNDt4 135,) nVEq 135a UNDER 1350 OVEd 1350 UNDER S35C OVEi $350 ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 36 4.94 t 7.41 2 2.Oi Z 3.07 Z 6.94 Z 10.45 Z 37 5.01 L 7.51 2 2.07 Z 3.11 Z 7.08 Z 1G.62 Z 38 5.07 C 7.63 Z 2.49 2 3.14 Z 7.1e i 10.74 Z 39 5.13 t 7.7a z 2.13 Z 3.19 Z 7.26 't 10.59 Z 40 2.20 L ?.Be z 2.15 Z 3.23'Z -7.35 z I1.03- z 41 7.27 L ?.Qv z 2.1d Z 3.27 Z 7.45 Z• 11.17 Z 42 x.34 .Z 5.01 L 2.21. 2 3.31 Z 7.55 Z 11.32 z 43 ?.41 'Z 8.12 t 2.24 Z 3.36 Z 7.65 z 11.45 Z 44 5.49 t S.23 Z 2.27 2 3.40 Z 7.76 Z 11.63 z 45 5.57 Z 8.35 •Z 2.30 Z 3.45 Z 7.27.1 11.80 Z 46 a.65 L 3.47 Z 2.33 Z 3.36 Z 7.92 t 11.97 Z 47 5.73 t 8.59 L 2.37 Z 3.55 Z 5.1U Z 12.14 z 48 5.6i Z 8.72 z 2.41 Z 3.61 z 8.22 z 12.33.Z 49 S.tic 1 8.85 z 2.44 z 3.66 Z 8.34 S. 12.51 'Z 50 5.v9 t 8.9d Z 2.48 z 3.72 z 8.47 z 12.70 Z 51 6.3b C 9.12 Z 2.51 Z 3.17 Z 8.59 z 12.49 z 52 0.17 C - 9.25 z 2.55 Z -..3.53 Z 8.72 Z 13.08 .Z 53 6.27- L9..4a t 2.51+ Z 3.89 Z 8.b6 Z 13.29 1 54 6.36 Z 9.54 Z 2.63 Z' 3.95 Z 8.99 Z 13.49 z • COST 3F LiV1NG .GATES ARE MAL TO 41.372 OF BASIC RAT S ��443 CUv1kA COSTA CUJNTY - ;� 1>ESCcLLJNEUU3 ME0111c1S bnAULU cNPld(cL C041R1bUT1JN RATES AS VFAR 3 FZPR_SSrD AS A PjAC`NTAGE OF NUN1Alt COAPENS411014 Effective 07-01-80 BASIC RATE C.O.L. tATE TOTAL RATE. AGE Uti012 t353 OVFR 5350U.40ck 135C OVER S3); UNDER S35G OVER 135; ... ............ . ............ ...... . .. a.. a.. - .•........... ............ ............. lb 1.73 Z 7.10 Z 1.89 Z 2.34 t 6.62 Z 9.94 Z 17 1.73 t 7.10 Z 1.d9 t I.B4 t 6.62 Z 9.94 -Z - 18 4.73 t 7.1L Z 1.89 Z 2.94 t 6.62 Z 9.94 Z 19 4.74 L 7.11 Z 1.BV t Z.34 Z 6.b3 Z 9.95 t 20 h.74 t 7.11 t 1.dil Z Z.d4 t b.03 Z 9.95 t 21 4.75 t 7.12 Z 1.9U Z 2.d5 Z 6.65 Z 9.9T z Z2 4.75 Z 7.13 Z 1.9, Z 2.35 Z 6.65- Z 9.9,1 L 23 4.77 Z 7.1� Z 1.91 Z 2.116 t 6.66 Z 10.01- t 24 4.7b Z 7.17 t 1.91 Z 2.d7 Z 6.69 Z 10.04 Z 15 4.79 t 7.14 c 1.9Z Z Z.ar Z . 6.71 Z 10.07 Z 26 4.02 t 7.Z3 Z 1.93 L 2.89 t 6.75 Z 10.12 A 27 4.,34 Z 7.2b Z 1.93 Z 2.90 Z 6.77't 10.16• t 24 4.87 t 7.30 Z 1.95 t 2.72 Z 6.62 -Z 1J.22. t Z9 4.4C Z 7.35 Z 1.96 t 2.94 Z 6.8b Z 10.29 - t 341 4.93 t 7.4C Z 1.97 Z 2.96 t - 6.9(r Z }0.36 Z 31 4.97 L 7.45 t i.99 Z 2.98 t 6.96 t 10.43 t 32 i.ut'. Z 7.5C Z Z.00 Z -3.10 Z 7.00 Z 10.50 Z 33 5.C4 t 7.3z t 2.J1 Z 3.12 2 7.05 L 10.511 t 34- 7.u9 Z T}3 2.J3 2 3.J5 Z 7.1Z t 10.bB Z 35 5.12 C 7.69 Z 2.02 Z 3.Jd Z 7.1! Z 10.77 Z CQST-JF LIVING RATES ARE E91IAL TO iG.J3Z OF BASIC R►TcS t 1 Uo1 CUNfaA CUSTA COUwIt MISCEILAMEOU) ME48EAS _ GRAOLO EdfLOTEE COMTRIBUTIUM RAU S AS OF 711179 YEAR 3 EXPRESSED AS A PERC3MTAGE OF AOMTALT CUAPEMSATION . •.•►rr•►••••r.r•r••r•••rr►•rrrrrJrrr�rrrsr►Irr�1•rr BAi1C,RATE C.D.L. RATE TOTAL RATE AGi UMOtR 935) OVER 135J UNDER -1350OVER 13iO UNOEA 1350 OVER 1330 ... ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 33 5.17 Z 7.76 Z 2.07 Z 3.10 Z 7.24 Z 10.96 L 37 5.22 C 7,93 Z 2.O9 z 3.13 Z 7.31 Z 10.96 L 39 3.27 C 7.QC- z Z.11 z 3.16 Z 7.3b Z 11.06 i 39 5.31 C 7.97 Z 2.13 Z 3.19 C 7.44 Z V 11.16 = 40 5.3b Z 1.04 L 2.1: z 3.22 Z 7.51 z 11.24 L 41 5.41 Z 1.12 Z 2.17 Z 3.23 z 7.56 t 11.37 Z 42 5.47 t 5.21 z 2.19 1 3.29 Z 7,66 Z 11.49 -Z 43 3.53 C z 2.2: L 3.32 Z 7,74 t 11.61 z 44 2.59 t 4.3a T 2.23 Z 3.15 Z 7.81 z 11.73 L 45 5.64 t 9.46 L 2.25 Z 3.32 z 7.04 Z 11.14. L 46 5.7C C 8.51, 1 Z.26 Z 3.42 Z 7.90 z 11.97 L 47 5.7o C 11.bra Z 2.31 Z 3.49 Z 8.07 Z, 12.10` Z 44 5.93 Z 8.74 z 2.33 L 3.50 L d.16 t 12.24 Z 49 5.b9 C a.a4 t 2.36 L 3.54 Z 8.2; L.. 12.34 Z 50 3.96 t 9.94 z 2.39 Z 3.iii Z 0.35 i 12.52 L 51 6..:3 t 9.04 Z 2.41 Z 3.62 Z 9.44 Z 12.66 Z - St 6.10 C 9.15 Z 2.44 Z 3.66 L 8.54 z 12.81 L 53 6.17 a.26 L 2.47 Z 3.70 Z d.61. 2 12.96 Z 54 6.24 C 9.3o C 2.49 Z 3.74 Z a.73 Z 13.10 z COST 3F LIVING RATES ARE EOUAL TO 40.002 OF BASIC RATES ~ 1' CU'41AA COSTA COUNTY MISCcLLA%EUUS ntnetRs GtAOrO cMDtOYic CONTRIRUTI011 24US AS OF 7/1178 YFAR 4 FX02ESSFO AS 1 PERCENTAGE OF MONTILf COAIENSAT10N Eff•ctlw 07-01-81 BASIC RATE C.O.I. RATE TOTAL RATE AGE UhOIR l31a nVEdt s"i50 UrtOcd_1350 OVER S35J �UNOER 5356 OVER 6350 ... ............ ............ ............ ..........•. ....•...•... ............ 10 5.17 Z 7.76 Z 2.00 L 3.00 Z 7.17 Z 10.76 z 17 5.17 L 7.76 Z 2.00-Z. 3.=Z 7.17-Z 10.76 Z YJ 5.17 Z 7.7o Z 2.30 z 3.00 Z 7.17 Z 10.76 Z 14 5.17 t 7.76 Z 2.24) Z 3.J0 L 7.17 L 10.16 z 20 5.17 L 7.76 L 2.00 Z 3.J0 L 7.17 L 10.76 z 21 5.17 Z 7.76 Z 2.03 Z 3.uC 1 7.17 Z 10.76 t Z2 5.17 Z 7.76 z 2.04 z 3.J0 Z 7.17 L 10.76 z Z3 5.17 c 7.76 Z Z.00 L 3.00 z 7.17 L 10.76 z ' 24 5.17 Z 7.76 Z 2.00 Z 3.00 Z 7.17 z iO.T• z E 25 5.17 t 7.7o Z 2.00 t 3.120 z 7.17 Z 10.76 Z-- 26 5.19 t 7.78 t 2.41 Z 3.01 Z 7.2C Z 10.79 Z 27 5.2t. t 7.90 - Z.01 z 3.41 Z 7.Z1 Z 10.31 'z 2d 5.21 z 7.81 z 2.01 z 3.OZ Z 7.22 t 10.&3 z 29 5.Z3 L 7.34 z 2.02 Z 3.J3 Z 7.25 Z 10.37 z 30 i.25 t 7.65 Z Z.u3 Z 3.04 Z 7.23 Z 10.92 z 31 5.27 L 7.94 Z 2.03 L 3.05 z 7.30 Z - '10.95 Z 32 5.29 L 7.95 t 2.05 Z 3.07 L 1.34 Z 11.41 z 33 x.31 L 7-97 t Z.Gi 2 3.03 Z 7.36 Z 11.45 z 34 5.3:1 t 9.02 Z 2.07 t 3.10 z 7.42 Z 11.1Z Z 35 3d t 9.07 - 2.05 Z 3.1Z L 7.46 Z 11.19 s cOST JF-tIVIMG aaTES MRF F.OUAL TO 38.63Z OF BASIC RATES oo� ClKl_ ' - CO'lTwA COSTA CUUMTY ' h1SCtll►MEu7S ntneFRS G4A3?D EiPLOtEt CONTw16JILON RATES AS OF 71117b TEAR 4 EtPRESSEO AS A PEi2CtNTAGE OF nDNTNLf CUMPENSATION dASLC RATE C.D.L. RATE TOTAL RATE AGE UNDE2 s353 OVE4 s9:;3 UNDEA3320 OVER 1350 UNDER t35C OVER 1350 :.. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 36 5.41 L R.11 Z 2.09 Z 3.L3 Z 7.5C Z 11.24 Z 37 - 5.43 i d.15 Z 2.14 2 - 3.15.1- 7.53 L 11.30 Z 3b 5.47 t 5.20 t Z.11 Z 3.17 Z T.5b Z 11.37 Z 39 2.5L i 3.25 1 Z.13 Z 3.14 L 7.63 L _ 11.44 1 40 5.53 Z 3.29 Z 2.13 t 3.20 Z 7.66 Z 11.49 Z 41 5.56 t 7.34 Z Z.15 L 3.ZZ Z 7.71 Z 11'.5• Z 42 5.CIL t 3.4I. t Z.16 Z 3.Z4 Z 7.76 L 11.64 L 43 5.64 L 5.46 L Z.10 Z 3.17 Z 7.d1 z 11:73 1 44 5.6b Z 3.52 Z Z.19 L 3.29 L 7.07 Z . "11.61 L 45 5.72 L - 3.54 Z 2.21 Z 3.31.2 7.93 t ll.i9 t 46 5.76 t 3.64 Z Z.23 Z 3.34 L 7.99 Z 11.9d Z 47 S.tlO i 5.70 L Z.Z4 Z 3.36 L 6.04 L 12.06 Z 44 5.d5 Z 3.77 2 2.26 t 3.39 Z 6.11 L LZ.16 Z 44 5.69 i 5.34 Z Z.Z7 Z 3.41 1 3.16 t 1Z.25 Z _ 50 5.9.3 t 3.90 L 2.Z9 Z 3.:4 Z 6,Z2 Z `12.34 1 51 5.9d t 3.97 Z Z.31 Z 3.47 Z 6.29 Z 12.44 Z 52 6.03 t 9.05 4 2.33 Z 3.50 Z 9-36- X 12.55 Z 13 6.Od Z 9.1Z 2.15 Z. 3.52 Z 3.43 Z 12.64 Z 54 6.13 L 9.I9 t Z.37 i 3.5. t 3.50 L 12.74 Z - COST OF LIVING RATES ARE F3U►L TO 3d.o3Z OF BASIC RATES Section VI(vii) COMNT'i Or CO',-4=,� COSTA Safety Members' Contribution Rates* PRESEP:T . Section 31664 Based Upon 6% Interest** Effective 07-01-78 Ertry Basic •Rate of Contribution 21 Under 6.539 22 6.63 23 - 6.73 24 6.85 25 6.97 26 7.10 1) 1 .24- 23 7.40 29 7.56 30 7.73 31 7.92 32 8.11 33 8.32 34 8.53 35 & Over 8.75 *As a percentage of salary (full contribution rates) . **Includes a salary, scale reflecting merit and longeviry and 3/4% inflation_ - - 00184 -68- 2/10/78 COATLS_HERFURTH $ ENGLAND.ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS - COLI_111 OF COi FIN COSTrn. Cost-of-Living Contribution Rates* PRESENT BASIS Safetv_Members interest at 6% ** Effective 07-01-78 _ Entry 3�e Rate of Contribution 7, 2.90% n2 2.94 23 2.99' ._ `{ 3.04 73 3.09 76 3.15 ?� 3.21 �g 3.28 29 3.35 _ 30 3.43 31. 3.51 32 3.60 33 3.69 ,s 3.78 33 v Over 3.88 .=:44.37% _of-.basic rates_ j ==laciuces a salary scale reflecting merit_and longevity and' /4% inflation. 2/10/78 -74- Cox-res. HERFURTH 74-COATEs. HERFURTH f3 ENGLAND.ACTUARIES AND CONSULTANTS - • : CdhlYA COSTA COuN1Y - - SAFETY M_MdERS GRA0=0 EMFLOT:_ CCNTwIBUT10N RATES AS OF 7/1/73-- YEAR 2 EXPPESSEO AS A 'EFCENTAGE OF MONTHLY CCMPENSATIO.4 - ................................................... Effective 07-01-79 BASIC RATE C.O.L. RATE TOTAL RATr. AGE UNn=i7 S751 OVER 3359 LNOER 1350 OVER 6350 uNDER 1350 OVER S35G 21 5.27 X - 7.91 z 2.15 X 3.27 X 7.45 X 11.16 X 22 5.31 X 7.96 -X 2.19 X 3.29 X 7.50 X 11.25 X 23 5.35 X 6.02 X 2.21 X 3.32 X 7.56 X 11.34 X 24 5.39 X 6.09 Z 2.23 X 3.35 X 7.62 X 11.44 X 25 5.45 X 8.17 X 2.25 X 3.36 X 7.70 X 11.55 X 26 5.50 - % d.25 X 2.27 X 3.41 X 7.77 X 11.tA' Z 27 5.56 X 6.34 z 2.30 X 3.45 X 7.66 k 11.79 X 26 5.63 X A.45 X 2.33 z 3.50 z 7.96 X 11.91 k 29 5.71 z 6.56 X 2.36 X 3.34 X 6.37 z 12.10 X 30 5.79 X 6.66 X 2.39 X 3.59 X 6.14 X 11.27 X. 31 5.66 z 6.52 X 2.*3 X 3.65 X 6.31 z 12.47 X 32 5.97 ,X 1.96 X 2.47 Z 3.71 x d..4 X 12.E7 X 33 E.07 X 9.10 X 2.51 X 3.7E k 6.5d X - 1"c.ii' X 34 E.1L Z 9.27 X 2.5E z 3.64 X d.74 X 35 6.29 7. 9.43 X 2.60 X 3.90 X d.69 1C-- 13.33 'X, COST OF LIVING RATES AR_ EQUAL TO 41.372 OF BASIC PATES 001 s� _ CCNIRA 60STA COUNIT SAFETY NENq:RS rRa043 ENGLOYEE GONTRIBUlION RATES AS OF 7/1/73 YEAR T EXPRESSEO AS A PERCENTAGE OF NOMT»LY %:0MPEM5AT10M .................................................. Effective 07-01-80 BASIC RATE C.O.L. RATE TOTAL RAT: AGE UNO$R 5350 OVER 1350 UNDER 1350 OVER 1353 U10ER S35C OVER 435u ZZZZZ=3.:333 21 5.73 x 1.59 X 2.29 X� 3.44 X 6.02 X - 12.ti3 X 22 5.75 x 5.63 z 2.30 X 3.45 X 3.05 X 12.03 X 23 0'.73 X 9.67 X 2.31•X 3.47 X 3.09 z 24 5.11 % 6.71 X 2.32 X 3.46 X 0.13'X 12.19 X 25 5.34 % 3.76 z 2.33 X 3.53 z '0.17 X 12.20`. X 26 5.av x n.6T z 2.35 X 3.53 X 6.24 X' 12.30 X 27 5.93 It 6.90 z 2.37 X 3.5G X 6.3C X 12.4.6 X 26 5.99 z 6.99 z 2.39 X 3.59 x d.30 X 12.57 X 29 E.04 z 9.06 X 2.41 X 3,6`2-x 6.43 z I2.ci X 30 f.11 z 9.16 X 2.44 z - 3.b6 X 6.55, X i2.d2 X 31 6.13 x 9.27 X 2.47 x 3.71 x d.65 X 1[.96 X 32 6.25 z 9.36 z 2.58 X 3.75 X 6.75 X - 13.13 'X 33 6.33 X 9.53 X 2.53 X 3.60 X 6.56 X 13.30 -X 34 6.02 X 9.63 X 2.57 X 3.65 X 6.99 X. 13.1.6 -X 35 6.51 x 9.76 X 2.60 z 3.90 X 9.11 X 23.66 x COST OF LIVING RATES AAE EQUAL TO ♦0.05X OF BASIC RATES -0�18'7 CCNTRA COSTA CouufY !:AFLTY NL1111i•f': - GKAUZI infLUYEE CON1.i1bUlION kAl" AS OF 7/L/7d rEAR 4 EXPRESSED AS A PERCENTA6E OF ItONistlY CDnYENSA7ID+► - ..................................................• ^ _ Effective 07-01-81 y BASIC RATE C.O.L. RATE TOTAL RATc AGE UM05d 1157 OVER %.153 UNDE2 $350 OVER i350 UNdcR 1354 OVE,2 i3ri 21 6.19 x 9.28 x 2.39 x 3.5d X - - a.59 z 12.66 x 22 6.20 X 9.30 z 2.39 X 3.59 X d.59 X 12.69 X 23 6.21 X 9.31 x 2.40 X 3.00 X 4.61 X 12.91 X 24 6.22 x 9.33 x 2.40 X 3.00 x b.62 X 12.53 X 25 6.24 X 9.36 X 2.41 % 3.b2 X 0.65 X 12.90 X 26 5.27 X -1.9.1 X 2.43 X 3.64 X 0.71. X 13.03- z 27 6.1t X 9.45 X 2.43 X 3.65 z d.13 z - 13.10. X 20 6.33 X 9.50 x 2.45 X 3.67 z 6.7b X 13.17 x 29 6.37 X 9.56 X 2.4E z 3.69 z d.d3 x i5.2:p x 30 6.43 X ' 9.64 X 2.4a X 3.72 X M.91 X 13.36 z 31 6.44 X 9.72 X 2.56 x 3.75 X a.it X 13.47 x 32 6.53 X 9.80 X 2.53 X 3.79 X 9.06 X 1S.:19 X 33 C.59 X 9.89 X 2.55 X 3.32 X 9.14 X 1 .71 I z4 E.67 X 13.00 x 2.57 X 3.0E X 9.24 X 13.GG X 35 6.73 X 10.13 X 2.60 X 3.9'3 X 9.33 x 14.93 x COST OF LIVING .RATES ARE EOJAL TO 15.63X OF BASIL RATES x`1188 Ii: TILE BQ:"M OF SG3?FEIISOPS OF CONL MRA COSH CCC i'Y, STAT: Or- CALIFORiM AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Ln the Matter of Award of Contract ) for Fuel Tanks at Fire Station No. ) 6, Concord and Fire Station No. 14,) June 27, 1978 Martinez. ) ) Project No.7100-4782 ) Bidder TOLL -k%X[JZTr Bond Lmounts Eagan and Paradiso Construction Co. $13,868.00, Lir & :Tats_ s 6,934.00 9220 "G" Street Base Bid Only Faith. Pe f. $13,868.00 Oakland, California Petroleum Engineering, Inc. Santa Rosa, California The above-car;=ed project and the specifications th re_for ming apprcnmd, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public trorks Director that the bid listed first above is the lchest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS BY = BOARD ORD=, that the contract for the furnishing o� labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first Listed bidder at the lister xmunt and at to unit prices suiaiittec: in said bid; arra that said contractor shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicates above; a*r3 that this Public Worlcs De^.artTnt shall prepare the contract teref:r. IT IS fbumam ORm-RED that, af',P-- the contractor has signed..the contact and returned it together with bonds as natal above arra any requires certificates of insurance or other required docLm nts, and t1-.e- Public Ubrks Director has reviewed and fourn than to be sufficient, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for t!-ds Board. IT IS Fbm= ORDERED that, in accordance with the project specificaticns and/or upon signature of the ccntract by the Public [corks Director, any bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be e-mc erated and any checks or cash submitted for bid security S:-,a11 be returned. as-sSm by the Board on June 27, 1978 I hereby certify that thw forego-ung is a true ars correct copy of an order entered on the �-ninutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. witness my bard and the Seal of the Board of Suiok----vi cors affixed this 27th day of June , 1978. Originator: Public tZr1cs Department (ZO� n9 J. D. CISSC'J, Clerk x: Public Works Director 1� County auditor-Controller Contractor By , Decutf Cler2< a Z. vie son 9.1 (R~-v. 9-77) Sandr M }. LEE]]ED CONTRACT (Construction Agreement)(Contra Costa County Standard Form) I50RSI. S:'::CI�iL iERtlS. These special terns are incorporated below by refer _DQ (SS2,3) Parties: [Public Agency] Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Egan d Paradiso [Contractor) 9220 "G" St., Oakland, Calirornia Complete legal name (S2) Effective Date: July 11 . 1978 [See 54 for starting date.) (S3) The Work: Furnishir.a and Installing Fuel Tanks At Fire Station No. 6, Concord,and Fire Station No, 14, Martinez, Budget Line Item No. 7100-4782. all in accordance with the plans, drawings and specifications prepared by or for the Public Works Director and in accordance with the accepted Bid Proposal, Base Bid Only. (S4) Completion Time: [strike out (a) or (b) and "calendar" or "working"] �'9xxxSxx*dttwxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (b) within 60 calendar/=orkAxxx)days from starting date. (S5) Liquidated Damages: $ 50.00 per calendar day. (S6) Public Agency's Agent: Vernon L. Cline, Public Works Director (S7) Contract Price: $ 13.868.00 f2Sfxi5?i�f ' 'tai Y�E�f '4x hl€ �x�4 �m�at�2a �x �Dc�sr�xgn�usgzxa'tt�tsxxsX�ox,txi�,i�c�v4,�s�i ' 2. SIGYATURES d ACKNOWLEDGMEN�utx�p�a�4ret�acKxmacts�sKj�xlsxic8xicnnpp3ac�sa�b�asx l Y. / Public Agency, By: ,�l ' �- / �I (President, Chairman Or Other on L. ine�r Ti�� ` Designated Representative) Public Works Director Contractor, hereby so ac dging areness of and compliance with Labo Code g Workers' Compensston Law. - By ✓/�v✓( ICORPORAT nate o i ial capacity in the business] . S>`AI Ile Design4Lte off cral capacity in a usxness Note to Contractor (1) Execute acknowledgment form below, and (2) if a corpora- tion, affix Corporate Seal. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - State of Califg9enia ) ss. ACKNOWLEDGMENT (by Corporation, County of (�(.(((ilT�r/!lt—' ) Partnership, or Individual) The person(s) signing above for Contractor, known to me in individual and business capacity as stated, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. Dated: L__/r � r ) i (NOTARIAL SEAL] Notary Publid - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORM APPROVED by County Counsel. (j (Page 1 of 4) 00190 (CC-1; Rev. 11-76) I'date7 these parties promise ana dared as set forth in this contract, incorporating by these references the material ("special terms") in sec. 1. (b) Contractor shall, at his own cO5 t ant' expense, and in a workmanlike manner, fully and faithfully perform and complete the work; and will furnish all materials, labor, services and transportation necessary, convenient and proper in order fairly to perform the requirerients of this contract, all strictly in accordance with the Public Agency's plans, drawings and specifications. (c) The work can be changed only with Public Agency's prior written order specifying such change and its cost agreed to by the parties; and the Public Agency shall never have to `pay more than specified in Sec. 7 without such an order. 4. TIME: NOTICE TO PROCEED. Contractor shall start this work as directed in the speci- fications or the Notice to Proceed; and shall complete it as specified in Sec. 1. 5•. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES. If the Contractor fails to complete this contract and this work within the time fixed therefor, allowance being made for contingencies as provided herein, he becomes liable to the Public Agency for all its loss and damage therefrom; and because, from the nature of the case, it is and will be impracticable and extremely difficult to ascertain and fix the Public Agency's actual danaae from any delay in performance hereof, it is agreed •that Contractor will pay as liquidated damages to the Public Agency the reasonable sum specified in Sec. 1, the result of the parties' reasonable endeavor to estimate fair average compensation therefor, for each calendar day's delay in finishing said work;. and if the same be not paid, Public Agency may, in addition to its other remedies, deduct the same from any money due or to become due Contractor under this con- tract. If the Public Agency for any cause authorizes or contributes to a delay, suspen- sion of work or extension of tine, its duration shall be added to the time allowed for completion, but it shall not be deemed a waiver nor be used to defeat any right of the Agency to damages for non-completion or delay hereunder. Pursuant to Government Code Sec. 4215, the Contractor shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay in completion of the work, when such delay was caused by the failure of the Public Agency or the owner of a utility to provide for removal or relocation of .existing utility facilities. 6. INTEGRATED DOCUMENTS. The plans, drawings and specifications or special provisions of the Public Agency's call for bids, and Contractor's accepted bid for this work are hereby incorporated into this contract; and they are intended to co-operate, so that any- thing exhibited in the plans or drawings and not mentioned in the specifications or - special provisions, or vice versa, is to be executed as if exhibited, mentioned and set forth in both, to the true intent and meaning thereof when taken all together; and differences of opinion concerning these shall be finally determined by Public Agency's Agent specified in Sec. 1. 7. PAYMENT. (a) For his strict and literal fulfillment of these promises and conditions, an as ull compensation for all this work, the Public Agency shall pay the Contractor the sum specified in Sec. 1, except that in unit price contracts the payment shall be for finished- q zantities at unit bid prices. (b) On o1v about the first day of each calendar month the Contractor shall submit to the -Public Agency a verified application for payment, supported by a statement showing all matorials.: actually installed during the preceding month, the labor expended thereon, and r]he-cosi ttiereof; whereupon, after checking, the Public Agency shall issue to Contractor -'a- certificate for the amount determined to be due, minus 10% thereof pursuant to Governmei►f Code Sec. 53067, but not- until defective work and materials have been removed, replaced and made good. 8. PAYMENTS WITHHELD. (a) The Public Agency or its agent may withhold any payment, or because of later discovered evidence nullify all or any certificate for payment, to such extent and period of time only as may be necessary to protect the Public Agency from loss because of: (1) Defective work not remedied, or uncompleted work, or (2) Claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing, or (3) Failure to properly pay subcontractors or for material or labor, or (4) Reasonable doubt that the work can be completed for the balance then unpaid, or (5) Damage to another contractor, or (6) Damage to the Public Agency, other than damage due to delays. (b) The Public Agency shall use reasonable diligence to discover and report to the Contractor, as the work progresses, the materials and labor which are not satisfactory to it, so as to avoid unnecessary trouble or cost to the Contractor in making good any defective work or parts. (c) 35 calendar days after the Public Ayency files its notice of completion of the entire (Page 2 of 4) 00191 woer; ivishall issue a certifi. _e to the Contractor and pay ti. balance of the contract price after deducting all amounts withheld under this contract, provided the Contractor shows that all claims for labor and materials have Leen paid, no claims nave been presented to the Public Agency based on acts or omissions of the Contractor, and no liens , or withhold notices have been fileu against the wort: or site, and provided there are not reasonable inuications of defective or missing wort: or of late-recorded notices of liens or clains against Contractor. 9. INSURANCL. (Labor Code 551860-61) On signing this contract, Contractor must give Public Agency (1) a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or (2) a ccrtificate of Workers' Compensation insurance issued by an admitted -lnzurer, or (3) an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director or the insurer. Contractor is aware of and complies with Labor Code Sec. 3700 and the Workers' Compensation Law. lu. BONDS. On signing this contract Contractor shall deliver to Public Agency for approval good.and sufficient bonds with sureties, in amount(s) specified in the specifi- cations or special provisions, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this contract and his payment for all labor and materials hereunder. 11. FAILLIZE TO PERFORM. If the Contractor at any time refuses or neglects, without fault of the Public Agency or its agent(s) , to supply sufficient materials or workmen to complete this agreement and work as provided herein, for a period of 10 days or more after written notice thereof by the Public Agency, the Public Agency may furnish same and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the contract price. 12. LAWS APPLY. General. Both parties recognize the applicability of various federal, state and ocal laws and regulations, especially Chapter 1 of Part 7 of the California Labor Code (beginning with Sec. 1720, and including Secs.. 1735, 1777.5, & 1777.6 forbidding discrimination) and intend that this agreement complies therewith. The parties specifically stipulate that the relevant penalties and forfeitures provided in the Labor Code, especially i Secs. 1775 & 1813, concerning prevailinq wages and hours, shall apply to this agreement as though fully stipulated herein. 13. SUBCONTRACTORS. Government Code 554100-4113 are incorporated herein. 14. WAGE RATES. (a) Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1773, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations has ascertained the general prevailing rates of wages per diem, and for holiday and overtime work, in the locality in which this work is to be performed, for each cr,, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this contract, and said rates are as specified in the call for bids for this work and are on file with the Public Agency, and are hereby incorporated herein. (b) This schedule of wages is based on a working day of 8 hours unless otherwise specified; and the daily rate is the'hourly rate multiplied by the number of hours con- stituting the working day. When less titan that number of hours are worked, the daily wage rate is proportionately reduced, but the hourly rate remains as stated. (c) The Contractor, and all his subcontractors, must pay at least tnese rates to all persons on this work, including all travel, subsistence, and fringe benefit payments provided for by applicable collective bargaining agreements. All skilled labor not listed above must be paid at least the wage scale established by collective bargaining agreement for such labor in the locality where such work is beiny perfbrmed. If it becomes neces- sary for the Contractor or any subcontractor to employ any person in a craft, classifi- cation or type of work (except executive, supervisory, administrative, clerical or other non-manual workers as such) for which no minimum wage rate is specified, the Contractor shall immediately notify the Public Agency which shall promptly determine the prevailing wage rate t4arefor and furnish the Contractor with the minimum rate based thereon, which shall apply from the time of the initial employment of the person affected and during the continuance of such employment. 15. HOURS OF LABOR. Eight hours of labor in one calendar day constitutes a legal day's work, and no workman employed at any time on this wor). by the Contractor or by any sub- contractor shall be required or permitted to wort: longer thereon except as provided in Labor Code Secs. 1810-1815. 16. APPRLUTICES. Properly indentured apprentices may be employed on this work in accordance with Labor Code Secs. 1777.5 and 1777.6, fnrhiddinq discrimination. (Page 3 of 4) 00109 (CC-1; Rev. 11-76) J 17. PItLFLHCNCU FOR MATtRIAL: The Public Agency desires to .mote the industries aad "bconvmy of Contra Costa County, and tue Contractor therefore promises to use the products, workmen, laborers and mechanics of this County in every case where the price, fitness araC. quality are equal. 18. ASSIG11=111T. This agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns, and representatives of the Contractor; but he cannot assign it in whole or in part, nor any monies due or to become due under it, without the prior written consent of the Public Agency and the Contractor's surety or sureties, unless they have waived notice of assignment. 19. NO WAIVER BY PUBLIC AGENCY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval of work and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee of the - Public Agency indicating the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor of his obligation to fulfill this contract as prescribed; nor shall the Public Agency be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from the failure to comply with any of the terns and conditions hereof. 20. BOLD IMMILESS S INVEIZ"JITY. (a) Contractor promises to and shall hold harmless and indemnify from the liabilitiCes as defined in this section. (b) The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the Public Agency and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. (c) The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the Public Agency approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s) or action(s) at law or equity concernin these. (d) The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent in connection with�the matters covered by this contract and attributable to the contractor, subcontractor(s) , or any officer(s) , agent(s) or employce(s) of one or more of them. (e) Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indennitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) , drawing(s) , specification(s) or special provision(s) in connection with this work, has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged damage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee. 21. EXCAVATION. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Labor Code Sec. 6705, if applicable, by submitting to Public Agency a detailed plan showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during trench excavation. (Page 4 of 4) 00193 (CC-1e Rev. 11-76) a+ NAME AND ADDRESS OF AGENCY James E. McGvoern Inc. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGES 1291 Fifth Avenue COMPANY e Belmont, California 94002 LETTER ^ CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INS. CO. COMPANY LETTER NAME AND ADDRESS OF INSURED PANY EAGAN & #-PARADISO CONST. CO. Yoders LETTER 9220 "G" STREET ,pWtMT- COMPANYAUG 41978 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA ETTER Hilt PANYR E PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT L. TE This is to certify that policies of insurance listed below have bt en issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time. COMPANY '' �'',; POLIcv Limits oL a it t In Thousands LETTER TY PE OF INSURANCE POLIO Ie'F O 1�. ��� LANPATIO t,Y DATE LACv AGGREGAT( OCCURRENCE GENERAL LIABILITYG1��� I BODILY INJURY S f A COMPREHENSIVE FORM CAP 173734 7-12-79 PREMISES—OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ S EXPLOSION AND COLLAPSE HAZARD ❑UNDERGROUND HAZARD PRODUCTS/COMPLETED OPERATIONS HAZARD BODILY INJURY AND CONTRACTUAL INSURANCE PROPERTY DAMAGE S 500 5 5 0 0 BROAD FORM PROPERTY COMBINED DAMAGE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS PERSONAL MJURY PERSONAL INJURY f AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BODILY INJURY (EACH PERSON) $ A COMPREHENSIVE FORM 11 (( BODILY INJURY $ OWNED (EACH ACCIDENT) HIRED PROPERTY DAMAGE f NON-OWNED BODILY INJURY AND S 500 PROPERTY DAMAGE :. EXCESS LIABILITY COMBINED BODILY INJURY AND ❑ UMBRELLA FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE f f ElOTHER THAN UMBRELLA r COMBINED FORM WORKERS'COMPENSATION STATUTORY and _. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES JOB : Furnisling and Installing Fuel Tanks at Fire Station #6 , ,Concord, and F Station 414, Martinez , Budget Line Item #7100-4782 , all in accordance with the plans , drawings and specifications prepared by or for the Public Works Directo and in accurdRLIce with the accepted Bid Propos -3 " Base Bid Only. Cancellation: Should any of the above describea policies be cancelled befcre the expiration date thereof, the issuing com- pany will gq,�kkmail _3 t]_ days written notice to the below named certificate holder. tX**tt 41 XAQ[ xQ�xodo�abex st�idi�avxac>iot+�l�io�risas�il itpcof a ogadaaQ�f[eca�•�agat - NAMEAND ADDRESS OF CERTWICATEHOLDER: 00194 DATE (J[6. 8/2/78-- ARCHITECTURAL DIVISION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROOM #112, COURTHOUSE AUTHORIZED RE7NINC. NTATIVE - JAMES E. MCGOVE ACORD'25 Ed.11.77) ENDORSEMENT (Form CA 108 ED 8/77) Extension of Coverage to.a Specified Entity I. Name and address of entity: ARCHITECTURAL DIVISION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIS WORKS DEPT. ROOM 11112 , COURTHOUSE, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PUBLIC AGENCY, ITS OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS ARE NAMED AS 2. Description of operation performed by the Named Insured:ADDITIONAL INSUREDS. FURNISHING AND INSTALLING FUEL TANKS AT FIRE STATION #6, 'CONCORD AND FIRE STATION #14, MARTINEZ, BUDGET LINE ITEM #1700-4782 , ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS , DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY OR FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. Coverages A and B shall apply to the individual, corporation, partnership or joi;tt ven' -rt: :,amet <i, this endorsement, solely, however, as respects liability of such described entity Ari.Ang OuL, of operations described in this endorsement performed by the Named I1;sured for tl"' descijued entity, provided, however, that: 1. The described entity shall not be considered a Named Insured for purpose- of titiF endorsement, and 2. No coverage is afforded by endorsement for liability of others assumeu under contract by 'Ie entity described in this endorsement. Cost of Job Rates Premium T.B. D. BI PD BI PD i 1 All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged, This endorsement No. , forming a part of Policy No. CAP 173734 is effective 8/2/78 ' Minedinsured EAGAN 6 PARADISO CONST. . CO. , 9220 "G" STREET , OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA t 4 v {i f� ;' JAMES E. MCGOVER INC. Authorized Signatu for r CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INSURANCE CO!'t'ANY - 001-95: w. 4'` -•> 7�7i°s}i4 .t,4r.E7."�?s.._' "-X`R,.IC. .�_..Z:•::., :t, PA-s�.._1-.tY.,..+ .�,. frws i., .._.._... !t. -. .�' ,. ,1i,`� : CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ISSUED BY OR ON BEHALF OF Albert M.9artdar Co.,Inc. rt Insurance Brokers Since 1881 50 Francesco San Francesco Caliform 94133 (415)3912600 REPUBLIC INDEWTITY COMPANY OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY Name and Mailing Address of Insured: Name and Address of Certificate Holder: r Architectural Division Eagan & Paradiso Construction Co. Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. 9220 'G' Street Room 112, Courthouse Oakalnd, Calif. 94603 Martinez, California! 94553 This is to certify that the Company designated above has issued to the Insured named herein the policies fisted below and such policies apply with respect to the hazards and for the coverages and limits of liability indicated by specific entry herein,subject to all the terms and condi- tions and exclusions in such policies. This Certificate of Insurance neither affirmatively nor negatively amends,extends,nor alters the cover- age afforded by the policy or policies numbered in this certificate. TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY POLICY LIMITS OF LIABILITY NUMBER PERIOD BODILY INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE •BI/PD CSL Worker's Compensation and Statutory No Coverage No Coverage Employer's Liability PC 957 054 4/1/78 to s 100"M No Coverage No Coverage 4/1/79 S .000 S '.000 S .000 Comprehensive Each Occurrence Each Occurrence Each Occuffence General Liability S 1000 $ ,000 S .000 Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate 1 S .000 Comprehensive Each Person Automobile Liability $ ,000 s 1000 s ,000 Each Occurrence Each Occurrence Each Occurrence 'Bodily Injury/Property Damage Combined Single Limit Automobile Physical Damage Comprehensive_ ACV Less$ Deductible ; j Collision ACV Less$ Deductible i Other(s) Commercial Umbrella _ s ,000 Erie+Occurrence,Aggregate Where Applicable. Liability in Excess of Primary Insurance. Others: 1 Description and Location of Operations and/or Automobiles Covered S SI Fuel Tanks at Fire Stations No. 6 in Concord and No, 14 in MartinlAs. a 1 ! i The Company will endeavor to give 311 days written notice to the holder of this Certificate of insurance in the event of cancellation of any policy or coverage listed above. 00196 Mareb 27, 197R ' Date City/stafe Autt wind Mp►esen AMD 976-14A4 �CATI R Co" UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CPANY HOME OFFICE. TACOMA, WASHINGTON Bond No. U 99 68 20 PAYMENT BOND Prem I ncl . CALIFORNIA—PUBLIC CONTRACT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that Eagan & Parad i so Construction Co. as Principal, and the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation author- 4„ ized to execute bonds in the State of California,as,Surety,are held and firmly bound unto s Contra Costa County Fire Protection District as Obligee, in the sum of Six Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Four Dollars and No/100ths Dollars ($ 6,934.00 for which sum we bind ourselves,our heirs,executors,administrators, successors and assigns,jointly and severally by these presents. The Condition of the above obligation is such that, Whereas the Principal on tj* 11th day of July 19 78 ,entered into a contract with the Obligee for furnishing and installing fuel tanks at Fire Sta.#6, Concord, and Fire Sta.#14, Martinez, Budget line item #7100-4782, all in accordance with the plans, drawings and specifications prepared or for the Public Works director and in accordance with rf the accepted bid proposal , Base bid only ' 4v3j NOW, THEREFORE, if the above-bounden Principal or his subcontractors fail to pay any of the persons named In Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of California, or amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to work or labor performed by any such claimant, the Surety II pay for the same, in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond,and also, in case suit Brought upon this bond,a reasonable attorney's fee, to be fixed by the court. This bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons entitled to file claims under Section 3181 the Civil Code of the-State of California, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in.any, jit brought upon this bond. Signed and sealed this 2nd day of August 19 F ..an $ ra i o - . . . . . . . . . . PAC INSURANCE COMPANY By . .24,V. W. f � Ja E McGovern _ Attorney-in-Fact BDU-2804 ED.5/72(CALIF.) r UNITED PACIFIIC INSURANCE COMPANY L HOME OFFICE. TACOMA. WASHINGTON Bond No. 0 99 68. 20 Prem $125.00 PERFORMANCE BOND n ,t CALIFORNIA - PUBLIC CONTRACT y t KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Eagan Paradiso Construction Co. 3 as Principal, and the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington 5 p gt corporation author- ized to execute bonds in the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto Contra Costa County Fire Protection District as.Obligee, in the sum of Thirteen Thousand tight Hundred Sixty-Eight Doll ars: & No/100ths Dollars ($ 13,868.00 for which sum we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally by these presents. z THE CONDITION of the above obligation is such that, Whereas the Principal has entered into a } contract, dated J u l y 1 It 4 19 78 , with the Obligee to do and perform the following worktowit: furnishing and installing fuel tanks at Fire Sta. #6, Concord, and Fire Sta. #14, Martinez, Budget line item #7100-4782, all in c accordance with the plans, drawings and specifications prepared or for the Public Works' Director and in accordance with the accepted bid proposal , Base bid only } C Now, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall well and truly perform the work contracted to be under said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force d effect. Signed and sealed this 2nd' da of Au ust - bm Y 9 I9 78 _ _ : " _ cAr f RA h ,sr _ ............................... / UNIT PACIFIC INS�JMNCE COMPANY .... - f(�] 1(Q]QQ mes E McGovern Anamay.in-Fact . 1ZU198 BDU-2801"CAL.-CONTRACT--PUBLIC r'PERFORMANCE B-2035 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 78 In the Matter of Certificate of Commendation to the Contra Costa Dental Society. On the recommendation of Supervisor N. C. Fanden, IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Certificate of Commendation to the Contra Costa Dental Society in acknowledgment of services provided by their volunteers. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc. County Administrator Supervisors Public Information Officer affixed this 27th- day of June 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk - ' By �, Deputy Cleric N. Pous 00199 H 24 8175 10M IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Workshop Session ) Pertaining to 'Health Care and ) June 27, 1978 Mental Health Services. ) This being the time fixed by the Board for a workshop session to discuss the matter of health care and mental health services in the County, including the May 16, 1978 report of Paul O'Rourke, M.D., Consultant; and Mr. Arthur G. Will, County Administrator, having briefly introduced the subject matter; and Dr. O'Rourke having appeared and having presented. a: statement summarizing the major recommendations of his report, and having responded to questions by members of the Board; and The following persons having appeared to express their opinions on the subject: Charles Pollack, M. D. County Mental Health Director 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez,, Ca. John M. Kaufman, M.D. Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Assoc. 2485 High School Avenue concord, Ca: Sunne Wright McPeak Human Services Advisory Commission 205 Patterson Blvd. Pleasant Hill, Ca: (Statement Submit.ted): . Esther Marchant Family Children's-Advisory Commission 1403 Meadow Lark Court Lafayette, Ca., George Degnan, M.D. County Medical Director 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, Ca. Karl E. Engdahl Contra Costa Dental Society 2100 Monument Blvd. Pleasant Hill, Ca. (Statement Submitted) Janet Black Alcoholism Information & Rehabilitation Services 110 Blue Ridge Drive Martinez, Ca. (Statement Submitted) 1. 00200 4 Cyril A. Pastrick Contra Costa Pharmaceutical Assn. 1806 Andrea Court Concord, Ca. (Statement Submitted) John R. Maas, D.D.S. Contra Costa Dental Society 96 Davis -Rd. #5 Orinda, Ca. (Statement Submitted) Mary Lou Laubscher for Marilyn Lane Citizens Advisory Council on Public Health 1122 Lovell Court Concord, Ca. (Statement Submitted) . Leonard_ , J. Dolton, President Contra Costa Council, Alameda- Contra Costa Health Systems Agency 110 Petticoat Lane Walnut Creek, Ca. (Statement Submitted) Chet Bolton Bolton's Prescriptions 471 S. Broadway West Pittsburg, Ca. ` Nathan Fisher Pharmacist 316 Oak Street Brentwood, Ca. J. L. Aiken, M.D. Contra Costa County Medical Services President, Contra Costa Physicians Union 1976 Mohawk Drive Pleasant Hill, Ca. (Statement Submitted) Katherine Braun J Ward Task Force 2311 Acton Street Berkeley, Ca. Tom Scott J Ward Task Force 390 61st Street Oakland, Ca. (Statement Submitted) Jay Mahler J Ward Task Force 22283 Betlen Way Castro Valley, Ca. Richard Hale Mental Health Advisory Board 1149 Larch Avenue Moraga, Ca. 2. 00201 Henry Clarke, General Manager Contra Costa County Employees Assoc . 2739 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, Ca. Pat Filice on behalf of Rev. Palmer Watson Chairman, Mental Health Advisory Board 2301 Rumrill Blvd. San Pablo, Ca. Judy Miller Manpower Program Director 2401 Stanwell Drive Concord, Ca. At the conclusion of said workshop, the -County Administrator indicated that he would be filing a report with the Board within the next two or three weeks. and the Chairman indicated that additional hearings would then ,be scheduled on aforesaid matters. THIS IS A MATTER OF RECORD, NO BOARD ACTION TAKEN. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a •true and correct copy of a matter of record entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid, f Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of June, 1978. . J. R. OLSSON, CLERK E7 U M. Vannucchi, Deputy Clerk cc: Director, Human Resources Agcy. County Administrator 3. 00202 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 In the Matter of Appeal of Mr. Robert Edwards from Orinda Area Planning Commission - Conditional Approval of Application for Minor Subdivision 136-76, Orinda Area. The Board on June 20, 1978 having fixed` July 18; 1978' as the time for hearing on the appeal of Mr. Robert Edwards from the Orinda Area Planning Commission conditional approval of application for Minor Subdivision 136-76, Orinda area; and The Board this day having declared its intent to continue, the hearing on the aforesaid appeal to July 25, 1978 at 1:30 Q.m. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk give notice of same by mailing a copy of this order to all interested persons. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. r I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Edwards Supervisors Listof Names Provided by affixed � 27thJuneof June 19 78 g Director of Planning . s J. } !L N, Clerk By. eP�Y �'-��C' '' f Clerk .��1'.� Ronda Amdahl . H-24 4/77 15m 0 V�0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Jiine 27 - , 19 _za 1n the Matter of Appeal of Mr. Clayton L. Grimm. from Orinda Area Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Variance Permit No. 1029-78, Orinda Area. The" Board on June 20, 1978 having -fixed July 18•,: 1978 as the time for hearing on the appeal of Mr.: Clayton L. Grimm from the Orinda Area-'Planning Commission conditional approval of application -for Variance Permit No. 1029-781 Orinda area; and The Board this day having declared its intent to continue. the hearing on the aforesaid appeal to July 25, 11978 at 9:30 a.m. IT IT ORDERED that the Clerk give notice of same by mailing a copy of this order to all interested persons PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of. CC: Mr.. Grimm Supervisors Oak Springs Home Association 27th June Orinda Association Planningafxed this day of 19 78 Committee Director of Planning - R.� LSSON. Cleric By ` ` 'Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl 00204 H-244R715m IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ` OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of the ) Orinda Area Planning Commission ) with respect to the Proposed ) Amendment to the County Ordinance ) Code which would provide fora ) Slope Density and Hillside Development ) Combining District for the Orinda Area. ) The Board on June 20, . 1978 having fixed July, 18, 1978 as the time for hearing on report of the Orinda Area Planning Commission with respect to the proposed amendment to the County Ordinance Code which would provide for a Slope Density and Hillside Development Combining District for the Oriinda. area; and The Board this day having declared its intent- to continue the aforesaid hearing'.to August •., 1978 at -1:30 p.m. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk give noticeof same by . .. mailing a copy of .this order to all interested persons. PASSED by the Board on June 27, - 1978 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a. true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of June, 1978. JAR-QLC By roll, onda Amdahl Deputy Clerk CC: Director of. Planning County Counsel' List of Names 'Provided by Planning _00205 . r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Governmental. ) Review Committee. ) June 27, 1978 The Board on June 16, 1978 having approved the structure of the Governmental Review Committee and having noted that the Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. P. Kenny) would submit a report on the duties/purpose of said Review Committee; and The Internal Operations Committee having this day reported and having recommended that the following charge for such Review Committee - be adopted by the Board The charge of the Citizens Committee for Governmental Review is to conduct, from a citizens ' viewpoint, a critical, constructive analysis of the function and organization of Contra Costa County government, putting to their best use those various disciplines contained . within the Committee structure. One of the prime missions of this Committee should be to assist the Board of Supervisors in maintaining the momentum for change dictated by the Proposition 13 vote on June 6, and to be sure that Contra Costa County is ready after the 12-month moratorium for the full imple- mentation of the Constitutional Amendment. This will require a careful review of all major functions of county government and their sources of financing. Another valuable function of the Committee would be to interface with the newly formed blue ribbon citizens committee. appointed by Governor Brown as they perform a similar review of the State government and its functions. The Committee should make every attempt to convey their findings- to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors by January 1, 1979. At the conclusion of its work, including a reasonable monitoring period, the Committee will cease to exist. Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having commented that he had reservations as to how said Review Committee would interact with County Departments at this time when County Departments• are working to implement the mandates of Proposition 13; and The matter having been discussed, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Internal Operations Committee is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978 by the following vote: AYES:. Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N. Boggess, and R. I. Schroder. NOES: Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that'this is a full. true & correct copy of the original documer., rrhich la on frig in mY oflim and that It was passe•! L ac;ontrd by the Board of ` Supervisors o: Contra Cr=�a C wiaty. California. on the date shown. r T TMT: J. R. OLSSO`, County cc: County Administrator Clerk&ex-officio Clerk of said Board of Supervisors Public Information Officer by Deputy Clerk. Internal Operations Cte. �JUP4 2 7 1 8 00206 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on the ) Appeal of Danville Estates Homeowners ) Association from Action of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning June 27, 1978 r Commission on Application for Land } Use Permit No. 2040-78, Danville Area. ) Kenneth & Patricia Thomas, Owners. ) The Board on May 23, 1978 having fixed this time for hearing on the appeal of Danville Estates Homeowners Association from San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission conditional approval of application of Kenneth and Patricia Thomas for Land Use Permit 2040-78 to establish a day care facility in the Danville area; ,and Mr. Harvey Bragdon; Assistant Director of' Planning, having advised that the proposal is permitted in the R-20 district subject to the land use permit procedure and that the day care facility would accomodate up to 30 children between the hours of -7:30 a.m. and 6:15 p.m. Monday through Friday; and Mrs. Patricia Thomas having stated that they chose to establish a day care facility in a residential area in order to- maintain omaintain a home atmosphere and that all county and state guidelines would be strictly adhered to-; and Ms. Aldonna Woodlee, representing the Danville Estates Homeowners Association, having stated that the proposed day care facility would be in direct violation of the Danville Estates Homeowners Association' s Declaration of Restrictions, would increase the existing traffic problem, and would set a negative precedent in the area; and The following persons having appeared in opposition, having stated that a day care facility should not be allowed in a residential neighborhood, and having expressed concern that the existing traffic and noise problem would be increased: Mr. Arnold Baker, 124 El Dorado Avenue, Danville Mr. Irving Snyder, 144 E1 Dorado Avenue, Danville Mr. Roman Ficarra, 132 Sonora Avenue, Danville; and The following persons having appeared in favor of the proposal: Mrs. Sandy Anderson, 80 Via Aspero, Danville Ms. Jann Horner, representing the Contra Costa Children's Council, 2230 Salvio Street, Concord Ms. Cynthia L. Woerner, 79 Casa Grande Place, San Ramon; and Mrs. Thomas, in rebuttal, having stated that there is a need for a day care facility in the community and having advised that the noise level would be kept to a minimum and that a circular drive would be constructed on the front- of the property to allow for easy drop-off and pickup of children; and Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having stated that in his opinion the proposed day care facility would serve as a buffer between the residential neighborhood and the adjoining commercial use and having stated that inasmuch as a need exists for a day care facility in the area he would recommend that the appeal of Danville Estates Homeowners Association be denied and the decision of the Area Planning Commission be upheld. 00207 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Hassel.tine is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27 1978. I =hereby certify that the foregoing is a_ true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27th day of June, 1978_ '. J. R. OLSSON; CLERK By Ronda--Am-id-aTI Deputy Clerk CC: Danville Estates Homeowners Association Kenneth and Patricia Thomas Director of Planning _ nn c�208QQ . 0 V In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 78. In the Matter of Proposed Master Plane for _ Buchanan Field Airport, The Board on June 13, 1978 having fixed July 25., 1978 at 9:30 a.m. for public hearing on the February, 1977 Airport Master Plan Study for Buchanan Field Airport; and The Board having received a June 162 1978 memorandum from the Director of Planning transmitting Resolution No 49-1978 adopted by the County Planning Commission which certifies that the Draft EIR and the response document for ' -the Buchanan ,Field _ Airport Master Plan were completed in accordance with CEQA and the State and County guidelines and which `suggests mitigatiop measures to lessen project impacts; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said memorandum, is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered;on the minutes-of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this27th day of June 1978 County Airport Land Use Commissioner Aviation Advisory Cte. J. R. �LSSON, Clerk Public Works Director By/tel U Deputy Clerk Manager of -Airports M. Vannucchi County Counsel H-24 4/77 15m 00209 f; In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California -'June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Approving Contract for AB 3121 Services On the recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a contract with J. Michael Harcourt for $450, during the period of May 12, 1978 through December 31, 1978, for consulting services . in negotiations with the State for payment of this County's AB 3121 claim. Adopted on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept. County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: J. Michael Harcourt Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27th day ofTrie'; 19 78 Probation Department Arthur Laib // J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Byo�/717i�'i?ifl Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson 00210 H-24 4/77 15m ,,,, I.oUny. STANDARD CONTRACT RCS (Purchase of Special Services) JUL 14 i478 1. Contract Identification Office of Department: County Administrator COunt'/ Administrator Subject: Claims Against State of California - AB 3121 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: James Michael Harcourt Capacity: Individual Address: 2255 Arrowhead Drive Oakland, California 94611 3. • Term. The effective date of this Contract is May 12, 1978 and it terminates December 31, 1978 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under_ this Contract shall not exceed $ 450.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: FEE RATE: $ $15.00 per service unit: (X) hour; or ( ) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert: day, week or month) .NOT TO EXCEED a total of 30 service unit(s) . 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: Consultation and special-=_' instruction, -in claiming of State Mandated Program Costs at the time, p'..ace, and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. .8. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. Contractor shall defend, save harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, agents, and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or'not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 10. Legal Authority_ This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. Signatures. hese signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR Zo.By: C airman, Board of Supervisors Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk (Desi e o ictal capacity By: Deputy Recommende Dep tment By: (Form approved by County Counsel) 002.1 "A`Cro'F'1med with board orgr w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Bale of Tax Deeded Property to the . City of Richmond. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an Agreement of Bale entered into between the County of Contra Costa, City of Richmond and the State of California, far the sale of Parcel .Nos. 560-140-003-and 560-l40-005 to the City of Richmond pursuant to Revenue and Taxation,Code Sections 3791 et seq., as recommended by the .County Treasurer-Tax Collector. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of,an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid_ • Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c: City of Richmond Supervisors State of California c/oTax Collector (6) affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 Auditor--Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Administrator By e&Z42V. 46 Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson ; oRn,, ' H 24 8/75.10M AGREEHENT TO PURCHASE TAX DEEDED PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT, made this 2 7" day of JUNE , 1978, by and between the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, and the City of Richmond, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter 8, of the Revenue and Taxation Code. WITNE"SSETH : THAT WHEREAS, the real property situated within the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereinafter set forth and described in "EXHIBIT A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, has been deeded to the State of California for the non-payment of delinquent taxes; and WHEREAS, the taxes levied on the property by the City of Richmond, are collected by the County officers; NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, �Lhe cost of giving notice of this agreement shall be paid for by the City of Richmond; 2. That the Board of Supervisors .of the County of Contra Costa agrees to sell to said City of Richmond and said City, of Richmond agrees to purchase from said County the property hereinafter set out in the aforesaid "EXHIBIT A", which shall not have been redeemed as' provided in the Revenue and Taxation Code, upon payment by said City to the Tax Collector of said County the sum set forth in said "EXHIBIT A" after the description,of the property and designated "Purchase Price", within 30 days after this agreement becomes effective. 3. That said City of Richmond will not share in the distribution of the payment required by this agreement. 00919 C IN IITNESS WMEOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto- subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized. ATTEST: BOARD OF SLIPZ. - I-Schrodpaf THE COUNTY OF.COWURA CD J R. OLSSON, Bye/ Clerk.. of Board of Supervisors - Chairman A By 4JA A4t Deputy amie L. jonnson CITY OFCAMOGiD a manic' oration ATTEST: Cit eCler (SEAL) 3 Approved as to form and legal adequacy City Attorney This agreement was submitted to me before execution by the Board of Supervisorsand I have .compared the same with the records of the.County of Contra Costa relating to the real property described therein. ' EMIARD W. LEAL TAX COLLECTOR - TREASURER BY d P. Lomeli Assistant County:Tax Collector - Treasurer _ APPR07ED this 5th 'day of Jiar , 1978 CORY, COiITROMER OF THE STATE-OF CALIFORNIA By �- Chief, ivision of Local Government Fiscal Affairs 'EXHIBIT All FIRST YEAR SALE PURCHASE DESCRIPTION DELINQUErIT NO. PRICE x Parcel No. 560-1.40-003 2967 1379 $200.00 That certain real property i.n the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California, more particularly described as: Harbor Gate, Lot 15, Block a. - Parcel No. 56o--i4o-4o5 1962 2098 $80o.00 That certain real propezty in the City of Richmond. County of Contra .Costa, State of California, more particularly described as: Harbor Gate, Lots 1 & 2, Block H. _ r 00215 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 79 7P In the Matter of Role of County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission. The Board having received a June 13, 1978 letter from the Chairman of the Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission advising that the- Commission -feels that it should play a vital role in coordination of park and recreation' activities and natural resource protection in the County, but that consideration of an expanded role should be withheld until the effects of Proposition 13 are clear. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the afore- said communication is ACKNO'aJLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of en order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Joyce Burr, Chairman Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Recreation and Natural Supervisors Resources Commission affixed this 27thday of June 1978 c/o Planning Director of Planning Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By&, . Deputy Clerk )`axone • . e e ' T.10 H-244I777bm 4!. Recreation:and-Natural Coeaeision�ftes . Resources Commission �o�tra Eugwm A.EWock Cosa I Ce Dsrr=B Boiog��i Robert G Planning Department (int Rim V.� County County Administration Building.North Wing P.O.Box 951 Martinez,California 94553 Phone: 372-2035 June 13, 1978 rRE:CEIVED- 111ij �6 1918 ' J. R. OLS"aON Board of Supervisors am 90AW °i: SUPW'30ps Contra Costa County co COSTA CO. P. 0. Box 911 Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Supervisors: On June 5, 1978, the Commission reviewed the recommendations contained in the Ridgelands Study. It is the concensus of the Commissioners that. the Commission should play a vital role in the coordination of park and recreation activities and natural resource protection in Contra Costa County. At the same time the Commission feels that it .would be inappro- priate to develop a definite proposal or request on expanded role until the effects of Proposition 13 are clear. Further,-.the Commission decided. not to meet again until September. We trust that the Commission will have a continuing role in- recreation and natural resources even if a reduced meeting schedule becomes .necessary. We look forward to working with the Board.:of Supervisors to develop a more definitive role for the Commission. Sincerely ,yours j ;.L r Joyc Burr JB/DF:sj 04217 microfilmad with board order t, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 ?,_8_ In the Matter of - Authorizing Transfer of Community - Development Administration Funds to Participating Cities The Board having received a June 15, 1978 memorandum from the Director of Planning advising that the Cities of E1 CQrrito and San Pablo have requested an additional $4,000 and $8,000,. respectively, from Community Development Block Grant funds to offset appropriate administrative costs pursuant to the Community Development Program Reorganization approved by the Board ori May 9, 1978; and The Director of Planning having recommended that the- cities' requests be approved and that unincorporated contingency funds in the amount of $37,000 be transferred to Administration to cover said costs and anticipated costs; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Director of Planning is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Cities of El Cerrito and supervisors San Pablo - c/o Plannins�fxed this 27th day of .r„nA 19-73- County Administrator County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By � Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufe d 0048 H-24 4/77 15m RECEIVED i r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY j Ufj a/ 1"'78 PLANNING DEPARTMENT �. a. O:.sso.14 CLERK BOARD O: SU?:RVISO?S CON FA COSTA CO. S ._,!!j* .. Doan TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: June 15, 1978 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu SUBJECT: Community Development Director of Planni Program - Committee Status On May 9, 1978 the Board approved reorganization of the Community Development Block Grant Program, established the countywide Housing and Community Develop- ment Advisory -Committee, and authorized eighteen Neighborhood Preservation Area Committees. The establishment of Neighborhood Preservation Areas in incorporated areas and the appointments to all the committees have proceeded very slowly. The Mayors Conference has yet to respond and nominate six members even though the composition of the committee was modified because of its concerns. The time available to develop the three year Community Development Plan is now critically short and it appears that few, if any, meetings can take place prior to July. Since the Count,,; -im st have a written Citizen Participation Pian by August 1, 1978, I recommend that the Board complete its appointments as soon as possible. In addition, the cities of El Cerrito and San Pablo have designated their Neigh- borhood Preservation Areas and indicated that they wish to utilize city staff to provide the necessary services to local committees. San Pablo has chosen to have two Neighborhood Preservation Areas and committees. In order to offset necessary and appropriate administrative costs, these cities have requested additional Community Development funds in the amount of $4,000 . (El Cerrito) and $8,000 (San Pablo) (see attachments). Presently, $37,000 is budgeted in the County's Fourth Year Community Development Program as unincorporated contingency. I recommend that the $37,000 be reallocated to general program administration and that the $12,000 requested by the cities of E1 Cerrito and San Pablo be approved. Staff will prepare appropriate contract amendments with these cities and the remain- ing $25,000 to be transferred will be held for other cities which request funds to offset appropriate administrative costs or general program administration. AAD:sj Attachments 00 Z1.9 c� �� Microfilmed with board ordrr. . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 June 27 , 19 za In the Matter of Approving Ordinance No. 3 extending Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 2 Good cause appearing thereforep 1T IS BY THE "BOARD ORDERED that Ordinance No. 3 extending through July 31, 1978 the provisions of Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 2 prohibiting connections to the sewage service system of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5 is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Environmental Control Supervisors County Counsel. affixed this 27th day of June 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Cleric $y' ll'" -�,, r-' ,.• .,r1� Deputy Clerk - Maxine f+I. Ne _eld H-24 4177 15m r i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Extending expiration date of Ordinance No. 2. W.O. 5418-0927 This Board having adopted Ordinance No. 2 prohibiting additional connections to the District's sewage system pending completiori'of a Supple= ' mental Project Report for Wastewater Management for Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 5; and The Public Works Director having forwarded said Project Report to the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board and the State Water. Resources Control Board for re-view, comment and approval; and Said approval having not yet been received by the District; - IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that expiration of Ordinance No. 2 be extended until July 31, 1978. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of as order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ORIGINATOR: Public Works Department Supervisors lt,, Environmental Control affixed this 7��day of , 19 cc: Public Works Director Environmental Control J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Land Development By Deputy Clerk County Administrator j Richard Rockwell, Esq . t Janes Maguire, Esq. Port Costa Town Council •0022 . Citizens ' Advisory Council via P.W. (E.C. ) CRutar7 younsel In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 78 In the Matter of An equipment purchase agreement AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD with Eagle Signal Corporation - OF THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT On the recommendation of the Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, IT IS BY BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Contract for Purchase of a Computer Aided Dispatch System with Eagle 'Signal Corporation, providing the ability to more efficiently dispatch emergency services within the District, at a one time cost of $377,750, commencing June 27, 1978. Passed by the Board on June 27, _978 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entereii on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig_ Administrator Supervisors CC: Fire District affixed this 27th da of June 19 7 8 Contractor y County Counsel Auditor-Controller _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By o���i�,tLc/G' , Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson 00222 H-24 4/77 15m AGREEtII4T Computer Aided Dispatching System This Agreement, is made and entered into this 2 77H day of ,{1INE , 1978, by and between the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, hereinafter called the CCCFPD, a special fire protection district of the County of Contra Costa, and Eagle Signal Corporation, a Gulf Western Manufacturing Company, a Delaware cor- poration, hereinafter called Eagle. The parties agree as follows: 1_ Definitions The following terms shall have the meanings set forth below whenever they are used in this Agreement_ a) The "System" shall mean all equipment, software, documentation, interconnecting wiring, training and technical services, provided and installed at the CCCFPD Communications Center and the fire stations of CCCFPD, including but not limited to the basic CAD, mobile status system, station printer system, radio alarm box interface and system, and the second disk option, by Eagle to mdet the require- ments of specifications published with the. "Request for Proposals" dated April 21, 1978 as amended and as itemized and defined in the Eagle "Bid Proposal" pub- lished under cover letter dated May 30, 1978, and all other documents submitted by Eagle in response to and in conformance with the specifications; on or before June 1, 1978. b) "Proposal" shall mean the "Bid Proposal, Contra Costa Fire Protection District Computer Aided Dispatch" and addenda thereto published by Eagle under cover let- ter to the CCCFPD dated May 30, 1978 and subsequent letter and Mailgram dated June 9, 1978 and June 12, 1978 attached hereto as Exhibits B, C and D; all of which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement,-and all other documents submitted by Eagle, and accepted by CCCFPD, in response to and in con- formance. with the Rz est for Proposals_ c) "Specifications" shall mean the "Request for Proposals" for a Computer Aided Dispatch System prepared by CCCFPD and published on April 21, 1978 and the addenda thereto, attached hereto as Exhibit A, all of which is hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. d) "Documentation" shall mean the current (for the duration of this Agreement) standard visually readable materials published by Eagle for CCCFPD use with the equipment and software, subject to the approval of CCCFPD_ e) "Equipment" shall mean all of the mechanical, electromechanical, and electronic devices provided by Eagle to meet the requirements of the Specifications and as itemized in the Proposal. f) "System Software" shall mean the programs, routines, subroutines, translators, compilers, system control programs which satisfy the requirements of the spec- ifications and are in conformance thereto, and related items which Eagle. has announced or may announce for customer use for the Equipment while this Agree- ment is in effect, and which Eagle provides for use by the CCCFPD_ ` g) "Site" shall•mean all buildings, and rooms therein, within which each unit of Equipment is to be installed. h) "Vendor" where used in the Specifications shall, upon execution of this Agree- ment be understood to mean Eagle, as used herein. 2. Computer Aided Dispatch System Eagle shall furnish and install, and the CCCFPD shall accept, in aggregate as a single, complete transaction and not as separate items, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement, an aggregation of Equipment, System Software, Programs, Technical Services, Training, and Documentation that satisfies the Specifications which shall constitute the Computer Aided Dispatch System. Inter- connecting cables required for the operation of Equipment shall be installed within the confines of the Sites and shall be provided by Eagle at no additional charge- . 00223 MicporumeCI with board orCl@� 3. Installation and Site Preparation Eagle shall perform all necessary installations and Site preparation as required by the Specifications. Eagle shall integrate and make operational on the Equip- ment, all programs necessary to make the System function as defined by the Speci- fications and the Proposal. Eagle shall assemble and fully test the CCCFPD Com- puter Aided Dispatch System at its facility in Austin, Texas before installation. Eagle shall perform a demonstration of the system at Eagle's facilities prior to delivery and installation at the Site, and shall rerun the demonstration as part of the final acceptance test before that test shall be deemed to be completed. During the initial system demonstration, CCCFPD shall be given three working days (24 hours) to perform initial system testing on the system. These tests will be developed by CCCFPD, and will simulate actual operating conditions. If the system does not pass the tests, Eagle will correct any problems found and re-submit the system for testing. Any expenses incurred by CCCFPD in connection with necessary travel to view and conduct subsequent system testing as above shall be at Eagle's expense_ Eagle shall notify CCCFPD of the date and time of this initial demon- stration in writing, and allow up to six (6) CCCFPD personnel to attend and observe the demonstration at CCCFPD's expense. Upon completion of this demonstration and. test, the CCCFPD shall certify that the system demonstration is in conformance with the Specification, if such is the case. This certification shall designate the completion of the system demonstration milestone delineated in the project schedule attached and marked Exhibit E. At this time the system will be shipped and :site installation initiated. Eagle shall certify, in writing, to CCCFPD, at the completion of the system instal- lation, that the System is ready for use and final acceptance testing. The final system acceptance test defined below shall commence on the following calendar day on site. 4. Performance Bond "Prior to commencing the furnishing and installing of the computer aided dispatch system, Eagle shall deliver to CCCFPD for approval, a good and sufficient_,perform- ance bond with a surety guaranteeing Eagle's faithful performance of this contract, as well as guaranteeing Eagle's payment for all labor and materials`used'in the furnishing and installation of said system. Said bond shall be in an amount at. least equal to the contract price, and shall name CCCFPD as obligee." 5. Liability Insurance Prior to execution of this Agreement, Eagle shall provide to CCCFPD, evidence of liability insurance with- a flat limit of not less than $500,000 bodily injury, death, and property damage. Such evidence shall be in the form of a duly signed certificate of insurance, naming the District as an additional insured under such coverage for the duration of and in connection with this.Agreement.CCCFPD will be given 30 days prior notice by the insurer, prior to any action taken by the insurer to cancel the insurance coverage. 6. Project Schedule Any dates, milestones, etc. referred to in this Agreement are contained in Exhibit E, Project Schedules and is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement. 7. Payment CCCFPD shall pay to Eagle a total amount for the System.as computed from the Price Schedule, Exhibit F, which Exhibit is attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Upon request of Eagle, milestone payments shall be made to Eagle from time'to time as work progresses, in amounts approved by CCCFPD, upon the following terms and conditions: a) Computation of Amounts Unless a smaller amount is requested, each milestone- payment shall be 90 percent of Eagle's cumulative costs of direct labor performed and material acquired for performance of this contract, including overhead, burden and reasonable profit; less the sum of previous milestone payments. The billings by Eagle to CCCFPD for each milestone completed (of which CCCFPD would initially pay 903) as documented by Exhibit D, will be as follows: OK -2- System Description Completed Not to exceed $ 16,730 System Demonstration Completed to 293,278 System Accepted ts it 53,233 CCCFPD shall not withhold milestone payments unreasonably, provided that Eagle can demonstrate that the costs are allocable to this contract and con- sistent with generally accepted accounting practices. The aggregate amount of milestone payments made may not exceed 90 percent of the total contract price. - b) Recovery of Milestone Payments Except as otherwise provided in this contract, payments by the CCCFPD for materials delivered, invoiced to, and accepted by CCCFPD shall be reduced by 90 percent and that amount applied against previously made milestone payments, made in error, until such time as all previously made milestone payments have been recovered. c) Reduction or Suspension CCCFPD reserves the right to withhold or reduce milestone payments. . �6if in the sole opinion of CCCFPD, Eagle is in such unsatisfactory financial condition or has so failed to make progress as-:to en- danger contract performance and recoupment of milestone payments. d) Title to Material and Work When any milestone payment is made under this contract, title to material delivered and installed and work performed under this contract, shall vest in CCCFPD, and title-to all like property thereafter acquired or produced by Eagle and properly chargeable to this contract under generally accepted account- ing practices shall vest in CCCFPD. The CCCFPD reserves the right to require Eagle to replace material lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged where no-fault is attributable to Eagle, while on Site, at CCCFPD's expense. e) Records and Reports Eagle shall request milestone payments only for costs previously incurred by Eagle and directly attributable to work performed and materials acquired ex- clusively for Eagle's performance of this Agreement. Eagle shall maintain reasonable records and controls for the-proper adminis- tration of this clause utilizing standard and generally accepted accounting y practices itemizing actual costs incurred by Eagle in the performance of this Agreement. Eagle shall furnish such statements and information as may be re- quested by CCCFPD or their designated agent. f) Reservation of Rights The rights and remedies of CCCFPD provided in this clause shall not be exclu- sive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies. g) Final Acceptance and Payment At the termination of the system acceptance test, as .defined in 7 below, the CCCFPD shall certify, in writing, that the System is complete and operational • and that the-work provided for in this Agreement has been completed and is accepted under the terms and conditions herein, if such is the case. This certification shall be known as Final Acceptance, and CCCFPD shall pay the entire balance found to be due Eagle, including the retained percentage, as stipulated above, within thirty (30) calendar days of that date. 8. System Acceptance Test This Article establishes a standard of performance which must be met before the System is accepted by CCCFPD_ This also includes replacement, substitute Equipment, and Equipment which is added, or field modified after the System has completed a successful performance period. If Eagle's equipment and/or software is delivered and start of the acceptance test is delayed by late delivery or non-operational Third Party equipment or software, -3- 005 then Eagle shall be relieved of such acceptance test until such time as the Third Party equipment and/or software is ready to begin acceptance test, or sixty (60) calendar days after the scheduled start of the System acceptance test, as contained in Exhibit E, whichever occurs first. 1. System acceptance. shall be completed upon agreement and certification, in writ- ing, by CCCFPD only when the following criteria are met. (1) The System is tested, as above, and meets all of the stated objectives in the Specifications. (2) All proposed hardware has been properly installed and is in a reliable operating condition. (3) All software operates and functions as described in the Specifications, Proposal, and as agreed to in the system description and is in a reliable operating condition. _ (4) All displays, entry functions, response times, and system operations are as described in the Specifications, Proposal, and as agreed to in the system description. (5) The mobile status system functions as described in the Specifications, Proposal, and as agreed to in the system description. (6) The station printer system functions as described in the Specifications, Proposal, and as agreed to in the system description. (7) The radio box interface functions as described in the Specifications, Proposal, and as agreed to in the system description. (8) Training has been provided to CCCFPD personnel as described in the 'Proposal, (9) Complete acceptable system documentation has been provided as described in the Proposal_ - (10) The entire system successfully operates and functions reliably Cas deter- mined by. CCS_) for a period of thirty C30.): consecutive days. 9. System Warranty and Maintenance Eagle shall warrant the System and provide preventive and remedial maintenance for the System to include Equipment, Software, and wiring. Any item found to be defec- tive within one (1) year of the date of the final acceptance, and not to exceed eighteen (18) months from the delivery of the system to CCCFPD shall be corrected or replaced as required at no additional charge to CCCFPD. 10. System Software and Documentation Eagle shall furnish to CCCFPD, at no additional charge, all System Software and Documentation as set forth in the Specifications and the Proposal, and, as required to support the System in all of the stipulated functions and operations. Eagle shall also furnish adequate Documentation to allow CCCFPD. or County Data Processing personnel to make modifications and/or adaptions to the System Software as may be necessitated by operational or functional changes. 11. System Software Correction a) Eagle agrees'to furnish at no additional charge, any updates to System: Soft- ware which Eagle has furnished to CCCFPD in accordance- with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. b) If CCCFPD requests modifications to such System Software; the conditions and charges appropriate to the modifications shall be subject to agreement between the parties. c) Eagle shall provide a correction service, at no additional cost to CCCFPD, for errors, malfunctions, defects, including latent errors that manifest later, if any, in the System Software which CCCFPD shall bring to Eagle's- attention- All such corrections shall be made in accordance with Sagle's System Software cor-• rection procedures in effect at that time. -4- 0022') 12. Amendments The parties hereto reserve the right to make amendments or modifications to this Agreement as may be mutually acceptable to them from time to time. 13. Taxes Eagle shall pay all applicable sales, use, .local, state or Federal taxes imposed on goods or services acquired hereunder, over and above, or in addition to sales tax identified in Exhibit F. 14. Contractor Commitments, Warranties and Representations .Any commitment by Eagle, whether verbal or written, related to the performance capabilities or functions of this System, shall be binding upon Eagle. Failure of Eagle to fulfill any such commitments.shall render Eagle liable for damages and remedies due as compensation to CCCFPD. 15. Patent and Copyright Infringement Eagle will defend, at its own expense, any suit or proceeding brought against CCCFPD, so far as it is based on a claim that any Product supplied by Eagle under this Agreement or its use or copying infringes a patent or, copyright in, or other proprietary right in the United States, or any foreign proprietary right (patent or copyright) which is subject to a convention or treaty to which the United States is a signatory, of any third person, if Eagle is notified promptly within thirty (30) calendar days after its commencement and is given full and com- plete authority, information, and assistance (at Eagle's expense) for-the defense, and Eagle shall pay all costs and damages finally awarded against CCCFPD in any such action that is attributable to any such claim, but shall not be responsible for any compromise made without Eagle's consent. If any such infringement is held to exist, Eagle shall, at its option and expense, and in conformity with applicable specifications, either procure for CCCFPD the right to continue using or copying the article, modify it so that it becomes non-infringing, or replace it with a non- infringing counterpart, if an injunction issues from which no further appeal lies and none of these alternatives is reasonably feasible, accept the return of the in- fringing article or System Software and so much of the other Equipment and Systems Soft4atee as are unusable by CCCFPD in the co_r :uct of the business in their absence, and cancel any future charges pertaining the-.'�to. Eagle shall have no liability to CCCFPD under this paragraph, with respect to any claim of infringement based upon the combination of articles furnished under this Agreement with articles not furnished by Eagle. If any principles of governmental or public law are involved, CCCFPD retains right to participate in action. 16. Remedies of the Parties. a) If Eagle materially breaches this Agreement in any of the manners set forth below, and fails to remedy the breach within thirty (30) days following written notification to that effect, CCCFPD shall have the right to'terminate this Agreement and Eagle shall accept the return of all materials delivered under this Agreement and Eagle shall pay all costs of such return including removal and transportation costs. Those conditions which constitute a material breach. include, but are not necessarily limited to: (i) Failure to satisfactorily complete the detailed system description within forty-(40) working days of the date of Agreement; or (ii) Failure -to satisfactorily complete the system Demonstration within'two hun- dred forty-five (245) working days of the date of Agreement; or (iii) Failure to pass the Final Acceptance Test described previously after one hundred twenty (120) days of continuous testing; or b) Notwithstanding the rights and remedies set forth in subparagraph (a) above, in the event a material breach is not remedied within the applicable stated period, the non-breaching party may waive or temporarily waive its termination right in writing and continue this Agreement in full force and effect. c) If Eagle is unable to restore a unit of Equipment to operating condition and it remains inoperative (which inoperative condition is referred to herein as "downtime") for a period of twelve (12) or more consecutive hours during any twenty-four hour period, a credit will be allowed except for downtime result- ing from any fault or negligence of CCCFPD or from scheduled Preventive Main- tenance. Eagle shall grant credit for each. full hour of non- ? downtime -5- in an amount of 1/500th of the total Monthly Maintenance Charges for the inop- erative unit. The credit allowance for each such unit of Equipment shall not exceed 1/30th of the total Monthly Maintenance Charges for the unit for any calendar day: When Eagle is notified of a malfunction, downtime for each incident shall be measured from the time CCCFPD requests immediate maintenance service and re- leases the Equipment to Eagle for maintenance: service and shall continue until the Equipment is returned to satisfactory operating condition. In the event that a unit of Equipment is inoperative, due to equipment failure, and the total number of hours' of downtime exceeds fifteen percent (15%) of the total operational use time for three consecutive calendar months, CCCFPD re-..- serves e-serves the right to require- Eagle to replace the unit. The purchase option credits for the replaced unit shall not be less than for the original unit, regardless of whether replacement is made at the request of CCCFPD. or for the convenience of Eagle. ' In the event of a Software failure, CCCFPD reserves the right to require Eagle to resolve the,problem. If, upon written notification, the problem cannot be resolved by correspondence, Eagle shall provide .necessary .personnel on site to effect the correction within three (3) working,days of said notification by CCCFPD. Failure of Eagle to respond in. the manner prescribed above, will result in a $100 per day penalty against Eagle to be deducted from the normal maintenance charge. d) The remedies set forth in this Agreement may be enjoyed cumulatively, except as expressly limited. e) Exceptions Both parties shall not be simultaneously liable for damages under this Article during the same periods of time with respect to the same Equipment and/or as- sociated System Software. f) Warranty ' Eagle warrants that z!:e System and Equipment, when installed, shall be free from defects in material and workmanship, as stipulated in the Specifications and Proposal_ 17. Arbitration a) Should any disputes arise with respect to this Agreement, Eagle and CCCFPD agree to act immediately to resolve any such disputes. TIME.IS OF THE ESSENCE in the resolution of disputes. b) The parties agree that, the existence of a dispute notwithstanding-they will continue without delay to carry out all their responsibilities under this Agree- ment which are not affected by the dispute. c) If Eagle and CCCFPD, via their respective Project Managers, cannot resolve a dispute within :seven (7) calendar days following notification in writing by either party of the existence of said dispute, them the following procedure shall apply: Except as otherwise provided in this contract, any dispute concerning a claim or controversy arising under this contract which is not disposed of by agree- ment will be settled by either of the following methods of arbitration at the option of the party initiating arbitration. Formal Dispute will be settled by arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association, and judgement upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Informal Disputes will be settled by an arbitration board consisting of three members selected as follows: 00228 -6- o One member selected by the CCCFPD o One member selected by Eagle a One member selected jointly by both CCCFPD and Eagle 18. Assignment Eagle may not assign its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the prior written consent of CCCFPD_ 19. Notices All notices provided for in this Agreement shall be in writing, addressed to the appropriate party, to its representative designated below, at the respective ad- dress set forth or to such other address or representative as is specified by - notice, provided. If such notice is sent by mail, it shall be certified, return receipt requested: CCCFPD: Inspector Roy A. Bell Eagle: G & W Eagle Signal Corporation CAD Project Manager, CCCFPD 8004 Cameron Road 2010 Geary Road Austin, Texas 78753 Pleasant Hilt, CA 94523 20. Applicable Law This Agreement shall be governed by, subject to, and construed according to the Constitution and laws of the State of California and all laws, ordinances, regu- lations, rules, etc. governing the County of Contra Costa and CCCFPD. 21. Indemnification Eagle shall defend, save, indemnify, and hold harmless CCCFPD and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising frgm or connected with the services provided hereunder. 22. Effect of Waiver The waiver or failure of either party to exercise in any respect any right provided ' for in this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any further or future right hereunder. 23. ' Headings Article headings are included in this Agreement for convenience only and are not to be deemed to be a part of this Agreement. 24. Risk of Loss CCCFPD is relieved from all risks of loss or damage to the Equipment during periods of transportation, installation,- and during the entire time the Equipment is in possession of CCCFPD, except when loss or damage is due to the fault or negligence of CCCFPD.. 25. Contracto_-'s Liability for Injury to Persons and/or Damage to Property "Eagle shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless CCCFPD for any liability or claim of damage or any kind suffered, incurred, or threatened because of Eagle's activities, .or the Activities of Eagle's agents, .employees or subcontractors, under this agreement, including but not limited to death, personal injury, pro- perty damage or any combination of the above." 26_ Severability If any term or condition of this Contract or the application thereof to any person(s) or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, con- ditions or applications which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition or applications to this end the terms and conditions of this Agreement are declared severable. 27. Independent Status of Contractor Both parties hereto, in the performance of this Agreement will be acting to their individual capacities and not as agents, employees, Partners, joint venturers or -7- 00` 9 associates of one another_ The employees or agents of one party shall not be deemed or construed to be the employees or agents of the other. party for any purpose whatsoever. 28. Subcontractors Eagle may, with prior written permission from CCCFPD, except in the case that the subcontractor has already been identified in the proposal, enter into subcontracts with third parties for its performance of any part of Eagle's duties and obligations provided that in no event shall the existence of a subcontract operate or release or reduce the liability of Eagle to CCCFPD for any breach in the performance of Eagle's duties_ Eagle agrees that all subcontractors shall be agents of Eagle, and Eagle agrees to hold CCCFPD harmless hereunder for any loss or damage of any kind occas sioned by the acts or omissions of Eagle's subcontractors, their agents or employees 29- Time Is Of The Essence Time is of the essence of this Agreement and shall apply equally to both parties. 30. Termination At its option, CCCFPD may terminate this Agreement without cause, within the. first thirty (30) calendar days from the date of this Agreement,"by- issuing,written notice fo Eagle_ Upon such termination Eagle agrees to turn over to CCCFPD -everything per- taining to the work possessed by them or under their control at that'time,,and 'CCCFPD will authorize payment for documented expenses incurred by Eagle. 31. Exhibits -The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated by reference into this Agreement: a) Exhibit A - Request for Proposals 1) Cover letter dated April 21, 1978, signed by Chief A. V. Streuli. 2) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Computer Aide& Dispatching Request for Proposals, dated April 21, 1978. 3) CAD Memo #1. b) Exhibit B - Proposal 1) Cover letter from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated May 30, 1978, signed by John S. Strance- 2) Bid Proposal for Computer Aided Dispatch System by Eagle Signal Corporation_ 3) Price Proposal for Computer Aided Dispatch System by Eagle Signal Corporation. c) Exhibit C Mailgram from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated June 9, 1978, signed by Robert E. Smith. d) Exhibit D Letter from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated June 12, 1978, signed by Robert E. Smith. e) Exhibit E Project Schedules f) Exhibit F Price Schedule •32. Complete Agreement This Agreement with its incorporated exhibits, any oral'or written warranties authorized under this Agreent, and any other attachments or documents authorized under this Agreement, is the exclusive statement of the agreement of the parties with respect to its subject matter and as of its date, supersedes all prior agree- ments, negotiations, representations and proposals, written and oral, relating to -8- O030 its subject matter_ No provisions of this Agreement may be changed or modified, except by an agreement signed by both parties. Signatures & Acknowledgement Of Recommended for Approval By.-_a- Chief, y: gChief, Cont uaty Fire -Protection District. Contra Costa County By: '< RA.Schroder ChaiAan, Board of Supervisors Vendor, hereby also acknowledging awareness of and'compliance'with Labor Code §1861 concerning Workers' Compensation Law. '(C9:2R6RATE By_` (Desgnate"officsal capacity in the business) President L.(Designate official capacity in the.business) Note to Contractor (1) Executeacknowledgement form below, and (2) if a corporation, affix Corporate Seal. State of California ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (by Corporation, County. of Contra Costa ) ss' Partnership, or Individual). The person(s) signing above for vendor, known to me in individualand business capacity as stated, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they executed ' . it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. Dated-.• oS 3 Ig70 (NOML Notary Public Form Approved John B. Clausen, County Counsel " .7 ___Deputy 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated by reference into.this Agreement: Exhibit A - Request for Proposals 1) Cover letter dated.April 21, 1978, signed by Chief A. V. Streuli. 2)' Contra Costa County Fire Protection District; Computer Aided Dispatching Request for Proposals, dated April 21, 1978. 3) CAD Memo #1. Exhibit B - Proposal 1) Cover letter from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated May 30, 1978, signed by John S. Strance. 2) Bid Proposal for Computer Aided Dispatch System by Eagle Signal Corporation. 3) Price Proposal for Computer Aided Dispatch System by Eagle Signal Corporation. Exhibit C Mailgram from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated June 9, 1978, signed by Robert E_ ,Smith- Exhibit D Letter from Eagle Signal Corporation, dated June 9, 1978, signed by Robert E. Smith. _ Exhibit E Project Schedules Exhibit F Contra (',Orta County. , Price Schedule ID JUN 9 A 1978 OjfjCL. Of �mini�ator. county with board order 0023211, CpofilmedZOO r O�tRA•CVS ,G q CONTRA COSTA COUNTY _ CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT _• OAR£DIS't��C� - - - FIRE CHIEF BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS A.V.Streuli Ralph L Aldrich 2010 Geary Road Edward B.Haynes Pleasant Hill,California 94523 April 21, 1978 Richard F.Holmes Leo F.Smarsh TELEPHONE(415)939-3400 Harold E. Ides SUBJECT: Computer Aided Dispatching System Dear Enclosed please find a copy of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District's Computer Aided Dispatching Request for Proposal. This document is the culmination of many months of intensive research ' and reflects the present needs and desires of this District in the area of computer aided dispatching. Vendors are encouraged to submit proposals for a Computer Aided Dispatching System, as described in this Request, no later than 5 p.m., May 22, 1978. On April 28, 1978 at 9:00 a.m., a Vendor's Conference will be held in the District's office at 2010 Geary Road, Pleasant Hill, Califor- nia. The purpose of this conference is to clarify any areas of the Request for Proposal that are unclear. It is requested that vendors . . telephone Inspector Bell at (415) 939-3400 prior to the conference and state the number of persons from your organization that are planning to attend. Sincerely. . A. V. Streuli Fixe Chief RAB:jcu Enclosure 03 i Saving the comnwnitles of Clayton,Concord,Lafayette,Martinez,Pleasant Hill, Wo/nutGetb,andsoms an/ncorparated County areas CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Computer Aided Dispatching Request for Proposals April 21, 1978 Contra Costa County`Fire Protection District Project Manager: 2010 Geary Road Inspector Roy A. Bell Pleasant Hill, California 94523 (A.C. 415) 939-3400 00; 34 sS, i.z� w_j}'",�l��rF_}'r`s3'j,,t�f. r;M yd—}# t. :•-: 1 i PREFACE Contra Costa County Fire Protection District desires to purchase a Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) System to assist the Fire Districts' dispatchers with their duties. The Computer Aided Dispatching System must serve the dispatcher by providing the dispatcher with maximum assistance while demanding minimum dispatcher operations to run the system. This system shall also provide the dispatcher with faster information retrieval to aid in reducing total dispatching time and better documentation of the dispatch process. This document is being provided to assist vendors in producing proposals to meet the needs of CCCFPD. CCCFPD recognizes that some vendors have considerable expertise in designing fire dispatching systems. Vendors are encouraged to include alternative system designs and/or options which represent significant improvements in system design over the requirements of this request. For reference purposes, the vendor shall identify the nature, extent and scope of any proposed deviation and reference it to the applicable section of this request. This document is not intended, nor should it be interpreted to constitute a restriction and/or to discourage any vendor from submitting a proposal. All proposals which show attention to CCCFPD's needs will be evaluated; however, only one proposal shall be submitted by each vendor. • TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph LagP SECTION I Specialized or Unique Definitions or Abbreviations 1 SECTION 2 - APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 EIA Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 American National Standard Institute . . _ . . . . . . 2 2.3 State of California Documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.4 Local Documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.5 Federal Documents. . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . 2-1 SECTION 3 - INTRODUCTION 3 SECTION 4 - SCOPE 4 SECTION 5 - PROPOSAL GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.2 Experience . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5-3 Demonstratable Model _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5-4 Non-Responsive Proposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.5 Contract Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.6 Proposal Delivery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . 5-1 5.7 Structural Alterations . . . . . . _ . . _ . . . . 5-1 5.8 Time Frame . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.9 General System Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 5.10 Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.11 Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.12 Spare Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.13 Software & Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5-14 Training & Manuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 5.15 System Phase Down. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 5.16 System Sizing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 SECTION 6 - BASIC CAD SOF'T'WARE • 6.0 CAD Software - General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.1 System Objectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.2 Suggested System Software Design _ . . . . . _ _ _ . _ 6-5 6-2.1 Over-all Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.2-2 System Functional Requirements . _ . . . . . . . . Paragraph Page 6.2.2.1 Calltaker Functions. . . . . . . . . . . _ 6-7 6_2.2.1-1 Operator Log On and Off _ _ . . . . _ . _ . . . . . 6-7 6.2.2.1.2 Incident Entry and Verification of Location . . . 6-7 6__2.2.1.3 Completion of Address Verification._ . . . . . . . 6-9 6.2.2.1.4 Incident Review . _ . . . . . . . 6-12 6.2.2.1.5 Message Function. . . . _ _ . . _ . . . _ . . . 6-13 6.2.2.1.6 Incident Routing and Queue Functions.. . . . . . . . . 6-13 6.2.2.2 Dispatch Functions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14 6.2.2.2.1 Suggested Response Function . . . . . . . . . _ . . 6-14 6.2.2.2.2 Unit Dispatch . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . 6-15 6.2.2.2.3 Station,Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-16 6.2.2.2.3.1 Unit'and Station Status Display . . . . _ . . . . . 6-16 6_2.2.2.3.2 Incident- Status . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . 6-18 6.2.2.2_3.3 Manpower at Station Status. . . _ . . . . 6-19. 6.2.2.2.4 UnitInsert/Delete Functions. . . . . . . . .. _ . 6-20 6.2.2.2.5 Closed Incident Function. . . . . . . . . _ . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.6 Alert Function. . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.7 Print Function_ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2-2.2_8 Training. Mode . _ _ . . . . _ . _ _ . _ . . 6-21 6.2.2.2.9 Assist Function . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2_3 Command Function. . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.4 Logging Functions . . . _ _ . _ . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.4.1 Hardcopy Printouts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.4.2 Magnetic Tape . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . 6-22 6.3 Other Requirements. . . _ . . . . . . _ _ . _ . . 6-23 6.3.1 Software Structure. _ . _ . . . . . . . . . . _ 6-23 6.3.2 Diagnostic Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-23 6.3_3 Omitted 6.3.4 Control Terminal. _ _ _ 6-23 6.3.5 System.Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-24 6.3.6 System Response Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-24 6.3.7 Paging Function . _ . . . . . . . . .. . . . . _ . . 6-25 6_3.8 System Files. . . _ . . . . . _ .. . . . . . . . 6-25 6_3.8.1 Geographic Data File. . . . . _ . . _ . . . . . . 6-26 6.3_8.2 Incident File _ . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . 6-26 6.3.8.3 Unit History and Status File. . . . . . . . . . . _ 6-26 6.3.8.4 Special Conditions File . . . . . . . . . . _ . . 6-26 6.3-8.5 Vicinity File . _ . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . . . . . 6-27 6_3_8.6 Response Card and Response Type . . . . . _ . . . . . 6-27 6.3.8.7 Alarm File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 6-28 6.3.8.8 Quick-Reference File_ . _ . . . . . . . . .. . . . . _ 6-28 6.3.8.9 Authorized User File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-28 6.3.9 File Conversion and Batch Software. . . _ . . . . . . 6-28 6_3_9.1 Geographic File Program _ _ . . . . _ . . . . . 6-29 6.3.9.2 Fire Assignment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-29 6.4 Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.4.1 System Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6_4.2 Fire Personnel Recall File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.4.3 Statistical Analysis Reports. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.5 Future Expansion and Applications . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . 6-31 00237 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Page SECTION I Specialized or Unique Definitions or Abbreviations 1 SECTION 2 - APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 EIA Specifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.2 American National Standard Institute . . . . . . . . . 2 2.3 State of California Documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.4 Local Documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.5 Federal Documents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1 SECTION 3 - INTRODUCTION 3 SECTION 4 - SCOPE 4 SECTION 5 - PROPOSAL GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 5.1 Intent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.2 Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.3 Demonstratable Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.4 Non-Responsive Proposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5.5 Contract Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.6 Proposal Delivery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.7 Structural Alterations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.8 Time Frame . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 5.9 General System Design. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2 5.10 Warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.11 Maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.12 Spare Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.13 Software & Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3 5.14 Training & Manuals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 5.15 System Phase Down. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 5.16 System Sizing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4 SECTION 6 - BASIC CAD SOFTWARE • 6.0 CAD Software - General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.1 System Objectives. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6.2 Suggested System Software Design . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.2.1 Over-all Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5 6.2.2 System Functional Requirements . . . . . . . . . 6023,6-56 Paragraph Page • 6.2.2.1 Calltaker Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 6.2.2.1.1 Operator Log On and Off . . . . . . . . . . 6-7 6.2.2.1.2 Incident Entry and Verification of Location . . . . . 6-7 6.2.2.1.3 Completion of Address Verification. . . . . . . . . . 6-9 6.2.2.1.4 Incident Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-12 6.2.2.1.5 Message Function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-13 6.2.2.1.6 Incident Routing and Queue Functions. . . . . . . . 6-13 6.2.2.2 Dispatch Functions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14 6.2.2.2.1 Suggested Response Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-14 6.2.2.2.2 Unit Dispatch . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-15 6.2.2.2.3 Station Functions . . . . . . . . . . 6-16 6.2.2.2.3.1 Unit and Station Status Display . . . . . . . . . . . 6-16 6.2.2.2.3.2 Incident Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-18 6.2.2.2.3.3 Manpower at Station Status. . . . . _ . . . . . . 6-19. 6.2.2.2.4 Unit Insert/Delete Functions. . . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.5 Closed Incident Function. . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.6 Alert Function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.7 Print Function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-20 6.2.2.2.8 Training Mode . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.2.9 Assist Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.3 Command Function. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.4 Logging Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2..4.1 Hardcopy Printouts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-21 6.2.2.4.2 Magnetic Tape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-22 6.3 Other Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6-23 6.3.1 Software Structure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-23 6.3.2 Diagnostic Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-23 6.3.3 Omitted 6.3.4 Control Terminal. 6-23 6.3.5 System Reconstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-24 6.3.6 System Response Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-24 6.3.7 Paging Function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-25 6.3.8 System Files. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-25 6.3.8.1 Geographic Data File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-26 6.3.8.2 Incident File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-26 6.3.8.3 Unit History and Status File. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-26 6.3.8.4 Special Conditions File . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-26 6.3.8.5 Vicinity File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-27 6.3.8.6 Response Card and Response Type _ . . . . . . 6-27 6.3.8.7 Alarm File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-28 6.3.8.8 Quick Reference File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-28 6.3.8.9 Authorized User File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-28 6.3.9 File Conversion and Batch Software. . . . . . . . 6-28 6.3.9.1 Geographic File Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-29 6.3.9.2 Fire Assignment Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-29 6.4 Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.4.1 System Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.4.2 Fire Personnel Recall File. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.4.3 Statistical Analysis Reports. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-30 6.5 Future Expansion and Applications . . . . . . . . . 6-31 • 00237 Paragraph Page SECTION 7 - BASIC CAD HARDWARE 7.1 Computer Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.1.1 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.1.2 Central Computer Equipment. . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.1.2.1 Central Processing Units. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1 7.1.2.2 Disk Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2 7.1.2.3 Magnetic Tape Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2 7.1.2.4 Control Terminals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3 7.1.2.5 Printer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3 7.1.2.6 Communications Line Interfaces. . . . 7-4 7.1.2.7 Watchdog Timer. . . . . . . . . _ . . . . 7-4 7.1.2.8 Communication Line Switching. . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 7.1.2.9 Modems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 7.1.2.10 Cabling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5 7.1.2.11 Cabinets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 7.1.2.12 Power and Grounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 7.1.2.13 Environmental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 7.1.3 Con+-+++ini cations Center Terminals . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7 7.1.3.1 Complaint and Dispatcher CRT/Keyboard . . . . . . . . .7-7 7.1.3.2 Dispatch Console Receive-Only CRT . . . . . . . . . . 7-8 7.1.3.3 Logging Printer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8 7.1.4 Interface Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-9 7.2 Uninterruptable Power System (UPS) . . . . . . . . . . 7-10 7.2.1 UPS Capabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-10 7.2.2 Power Requirements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-10 7.3 Operating System and Related Software . . . . . . . . 7-11 SECTION 8 - ADD-ON MODULES 8 Add-On Modules. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.1 Mobile Status Module. . . . . . . . . . 8 8.1.1 Hardware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.1.1.1 Mobile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8.1.1.2 Base Station. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.1.2 Software. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1 8.1.3 Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2 8.1.4 Use of Other Hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3 8.2 Station Printer Module. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4 8.2.1 Hardware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4 8.2.2 Software. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5 8.2.2.1 Printer Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5 8.2.2.2 Station Printer Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5 8_3 Radio Alarm Box Interface Module. . . . . . . . . . . 8-7 8.3.1 Hardware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-7 8.3.2 Software. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-7 8.3.2.1 Functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-7 8.3.2.2 Logging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-8 8.3.3 Pending Alert . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-8 SECTION 9 - PROPOSAL GENERAL CONDITIONS 00238 9.1 Issuing Office. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Paragraph Page 9.2 Incurring Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.3 Inquiries . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.4 Proposal Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9.5 Closing Date. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.6 Rejection of Proposals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.7 Proposal Acceptance Period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.8 Proposal Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.9 Acceptance of Proposal Content. . . . . . . . . 9-1. 9.10 Oral Presentations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-1 9.11 Rights to Submitted Material. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-2 9.12 Announcement of Award . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-2 9.13 News Releases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-2 9.14 Number of Copies.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-2 9.15 Right to Retain A Consultant. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-2 9.16 Funding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-3 9.17 Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-3 SECTION 10 - PROPOSAL FORMAT 10.1 Technical Proposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10.2 Price Proposal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-3 10.3 Sample Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-4 SECTION 11 - PROCUREMENT PROCESS 11.1 Proposal Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11.2 Negotiation and Contracting . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11.3 Proposals Shall Be Final. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11-1 SECTION 12 - SUMMARY 12 APPENDIX A Manual Dispatching System Documentation, Policies and Procedures SECTION A - 1 Present Manual System Documentation and Flow Charts SECTION A - 2 Sample Incident SECTION A - 3 Selected Form Samples SECTION A - 4 Selected Policies and Procedures APPENDIX B Street Name Characteristics • 00239 SECTION 1 —SPECIALIZED OR UNIQUE DEFINITIONS OR ABBREVIATIONS CCCFPD: Contra Costa County Fire Protection. District RFP- Request for Proposal CAD: Computer Aided Dispatching Communications Center: The existing District facility located at 2900 Dorothy' Road, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 ISO: Insurance Services Office NFPA: National Fire Protection Association i 0024 2 SECTION 2 - APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS 2.1 EIA SPECIFICATIONS The following publications of the Electronic Industries Association of the, latest date of issue as of date of contract, are a part of this specifica- tion as applicable. RS-232C, Interface Between Data Terminal Equipment and Data Communi- cations Equipment Employing Serial Binary Data Interchange. RS-310, Racks, Panels, and Associated Equipment. 2.2 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD INSTITUTE The following publications of the American National Standards Institute of the latest date of issue as of date of contract, are a part of this speci- fication as applicable. X3.4 Code for Information Interchange. X3.5 Flowchart Symbols and Their Usage in Information Processing. X3.12 Vocabulary For Information Processing. 2.3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DOCUMENTS CALOSHA Rules and Regulations. California Codes: Government Health and Safety, Business and Professions, Public Resources, Civil, Civil Procedure, Revenue and Taxation, and Commer- cial. 2.4 LOCAL DOCUMENTS Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, National Fire Protection Associa- tion Standards, and all other ordinances, codes, and regulations which are applicable. 00241 2-1 All items having electrical characteristics must be approved or listed by • the Underwriter's Laboratories, Inc., or be approved by the U.S. Bureau of Standards, or other recognized authority, and shall be in conformity with the Electrical Code of the City of Pleasant Hill. 2.5 FEDERAL DOCUMENTS Federal Communications Commission Rules and Regulations of the latest date of issue as of date of contract, are a part of this specification as' appli- cable. 00242 3 SECTION 3 - INTRODUCTION The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District lies in the rapidly growing central area of Contra Costa County, California, located approximately thirty miles east of San Francisco and north of Oakland. The District consists of eighteen fire stations, 250 paid employees, and approximately 70 reserve fire- fighters serving an area of 185 square miles of land, which includes six cities ranging from 2,000-100,000 in population. The total population is approximately 250,000 people. Within the Fire District is a thriving community complex with agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial components. In addition, growth has generated development of shopping centers, apartment complexes, and large tracts of single family homes. •Grass and accessible brush land are a part of the fire protection problem within the County District. The District responded to approximately 8,600 incidents in 1977, representing an increase of approximately 17% over 1976. A majority of the increase is attributable to calls of a medical nature. In 1977, a report was produced showing that a Computer Aided Dispatching System would be a cost effective and justified alternative to the present manual dis- patching system. In September of that year, Inspector Roy A. Bell was re-assigned from the Fire Prevention Bureau to study and document the present manual dispatching system, and to study Computer Aided Dispatching in general. 00"?4 3 3-1 In December of 1977, a Computer Aided Dispatching Committee was formed to study and review computer aided dispatching needs. The Committee consists of Assistant Chief Gerald Duarte, Battalion Chief William Cullen, Cormmuaica- tions Supervisor Alan Nielsen, Inspector Roy Bell, Firefighter/Dispatcher Harold Crofford, Cyril Jones, Robert Collinsworth, and Advisor David Holcombe, Assistant Manager, Emergency Communication Consolidation (911) Study. This "Request for Proposal" is the culmination of intensive research by the Committee and reflects the present and future needs and desires of this Dis- trict in the area of Computer Aided Dispatching. 0024 4 SECTION 4 - SCOPE A computer aided dispatch (CAD) system will be provided to improve CCCFPD's ability to perform its services to the public in an efficient and timely manner. In general, the selected computer system must improve the efficiency of operations by rapid access and display of information, by providing tools to allow the dispatcher to easily,::accurately,-and-�quickly perform routine tasks and completely automating those tasks which require no decision making. The system will not interfere in the decision making process. The system will be carefully designed to insure that all key decisions related to the utilization of resources are left to personnel In addition, dispatchers will be provided override capability in the case of minor decisions which the computer system can normally perform automatically. In addition to improved efficiency of real time operations, the system will provide for the accurate logging of all operational activity associated with incidents and personnel. This will provide an accurate data base for rapid operations analysis and feedback for further improvement in operational efficiency in a much shorter time period than possible with the manual. system. 0024 5 SECTION 5 - PROPOSAL GENERAL REQUIREHUM 5.1 INTENT It is the desire of CCCFPD to acquire a complete ("Turn Key") system from a single vendor who has total responsibility for proper hardware and soft- ware, oftware, installation, operation, system testing, and integration of the mobile status system and station.printers. 5.2 EXPERIENCE Vendors shall submit a detailed system proposal and description in sufficient detail to allow evaluation by the District of the vendor's ability to perform the required work. Vendors shall have some prior demonstrated experience in the field of computer assisted dispatching, specifically as it relates to fire department operations. 5.3 DEMONSTRATABLE MODEL it is a requirement that a representative model of the proposed system be presently in use by a public safety agency and in a condition that it may be demonstrated to designated representatives of CCCFPD. 5.4 NON-RESPONSIVE PROPOSALS Any proposal that does not directly address the needs of CCCFPD as described in this RFP will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered. The system proposal of a vendor that is unable to prove to CCCFPD his ability to furnish the computer assisted dispatching system as delineated will not be considered. OOZ4 5-1 5.5 CONTRACT AWARD Due to time constraints and budgetary requirements, it is imperative that CCCFPD award a contract to the successful vendor between the dates of June 7, 1978 and June 30, 1978. 5.6 PROPOSAL DELIVERY CCCFPD shall accept no responsibility for failure of the mails to deliver system proposals on or before the date and time specified. Proposals received after date and time specified shall not be considered._ 5.7 STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS The nature, extent, and estimated cost for any and all minor structural alter- ations necessary to install or operate the proposed CAD system shall be des- cribed in the proposal. It is anticipated that CCCFPD will make any minor structural alterations that are necessary. Major structural alterations are not acceptable by CCCFPD. 5.8 TIME FRAME Actual time frame will be dependent upon vendors proposals; however, the fol- lowing desired time frame will be of concern to vendors in preparing their proposals. 4/21/78 Issue Request for Proposal 4/28/78 Vendor's conference 5/22/78 Proposal receipt deadline 6/7-6/30/78 Award contract 2/1/79 (approximately) Install CAD hardware . Load CAD software. Load CCCFPD's data base 6/1/79 Begin tests of CAD system 7/1/79 CAD system acceptance 00247 5-2 1/1/80 Complete installation of mobile status and • station printer modules. 5.9 GENERAL SYSTEM DESIGN The dispatching system covered by this section comprises four major modules or sub-systems. They are: 1. Computer Assisted Dispatching. 2. Automated mobile status. 3. Station printers. 4. Radio alarm box system interface. Block Diagram Computer Assisted Dispatching Mobile Station Alarm Box Add-on Status Printers Modules -Interfaces Vendors shall utilize a total systems approach when preparing their proposals. - The CAD system module must be completely independent of any and all other add- on modules, and the add-on modules must be independent of each other, yet use the CAD system to the fullest extent possible. This independence is necessary to provide as much protection as possible for the total system, should one or more add-on modules fail. All modules must be totally compatible with each • other. 00248 5-3 5.10 WARRANTY • The proposal shall specifically state the nature, extent, period and costs of software and hardware warranties. It is desirable that the warranty period extend for at least one year beyond the date of original system acceptance. It is also desirable that all hardware and.software be warrantied'to provide correction of all failures of the system to perform as required by the final contract, and any required preventative or routine maintenance. All warranties shall cover all costs, including parts and labor charges. Labor charges (hourly rates) shall be shown for providing software changes over and above contract specifications as requested by CCCFPD during this period. 5.11 MAINTENANCE The proposal shall contain a cost for a maintenance contract covering the period of one year immediately following the end of the warranty period. This mainten- ance contract shall cover all parts and labor required to correct any failures of the system to perform as required by the final contract and any required pre- ventative or routine maintenance. If service is to be provided by more than one vendor, the proposal shall indicate the name and the responsibilities of each vendor. Labor charges (hourly rates) should be shown for providing software changes requested by CCCFPD during this period. 5.12 SPARE PARTS A description and price of any and all spare parts deemed necessary by the vendor for proper system reliability shall be included in the proposal. 5.13 SOFTWARE & DOCUMENTATION All system software and documentation shall be provided to the District, includ- ing source programs, flow charts, etc. Documentation shall be sufficient to allow County Data Processing personnel to make modifications, alterations, or 00249 5-4 additions to the system software as may be necessary. It is desirable that once delivered and accepted, the system software, other than the operating system, becomes the sole property of this District to use within: this County as it pleases. If this is not unconditionally acceptable, list any and all restrictions, licenses, or�conditions, that would apply. Specifically address and explain the following points. 1. Can this District enter into a contract dispatching agreement with other fire districts? 2. Can this District give/sell the total CAD system, including hardware and software, to a County administrated 911 .combined communication system? 3. Can this District give/sell a copy of the system software to another public agency within the County while maintaining the original system capabilities at CCCFPD? 5.14 TRAINING & MANUALS on-site training shall be conducted by the vendor in the areas of system opera- tion, system hardware, maintenance and system trouble shooting. The vendor shall provide user manuals. The type of training and manuals to be provided shall be specified in the proposal. 5.15 SYSTEM PHASE DOWN Vendors Should describe in detail, their recommendations for system phase down. Total system phase down should have intermediate steps between the full CAD and full manual mode. � 5.16 SYSTEM SIZING 00; 50 The total system shall be sized to allow future growth and some additional 5-5 programming. CCCFPD does not intend to purchase a system that allows only sminor expansion. Conversely, CCCFPD will not purchase a system that is sized to such an extent so that it is not cost effective to maintain only the pro- posed CAD system. 00251 6 • SECTION 6 - BASIC CAD SOFTWARE 6.0 CAD SOFTWARE - GENERAL The following section describes CAD software objectives which must be met by vendors proposals, and a sub-section on a suggested software design to meet the objectives. The suggested software design is included to give direction to the vendors on how CCCFPD presently envisions the software design. This design is not considered to be mandatory, and vendors have some latitude in proposing an alternative design in their proposal; the suggested software design will be used as a "yardstick" during the proposal evaluation process in determining which vendors meet or exceed this design. 6.1 SYSTEM OBJECTIVES The CAD system through, the use of a computer and CRT terminals,will eliminate the need for the traditional street cards, response cards, incident forms and will provide the following specific features and benefits: * Highly legible incident display forms will replace the handwritten forms. These forms will be filled out via an alphanumeric keyboard. * A geographical file which automatically verifies the location and deter- mines the appropriate alarm response for the incident. This can signif- icantly reduce the time and errors associated with checking locations manually. The system will automatically display to the operator possible correct locations in the event of an incorrect address entry. * During incident entry the system will automatically display for calltakerj dispatcher review, a summary of any incidents in that vicinity that have 00252 6-1 been entered into the system in order to aid in the prevention of dupli- cate incident entry and dispatch. * The system will automatically time and date stamp the incident and dis- play the formated incident for dispatch with the proper alarm response assignment. This will eliminate the task of manual time recording and the necessity for personnel to manually search street and response card files. * The systam will automatically display for the dispatcher a suggested re- sponse of units which are available to respond to an incident and auto- matically time stamp the status change of each unit through status en- coders/decoders located in each unit during its assigned activity. This once again will eliminate the task of manually time stamping the incident for such events as unit "Enroute", unit "At Scene" and unit "Available% * Ability to enter a municipal fire alarm or private alarm box number which bypasses incident entry and displays the suggested response assigned to that alarm. * Each transmitting unit to be identified by the dispatcher via the unit identification and channel appearing on the CRT. * Status reporting equipment which allows field units to maintain their unit status on the CRT terminal thereby minimizing the need for the dis- patcher to maintain the status of field units by CRT keyboard entry. This idoes not preclude the dispatcher from maintaining or overriding status via keyboard entry. 00253 6-2 * Computer to computer interface to allow direct access from all CRT termin- als to information files in other computers. * All incident and unit activity information will be logged onto magnetic tape for future processing on-site or-on the County computer in order to generate statistical reports for operational analysis. This will elimin- ate the tedious task of manually searching an incident card file and/or key punching of operations information. * Since information is stored in the system, it will be available for imine- diate recall by all operators. For example, incident summaries and unit activity summaries will be available for review at all terminals. Subse- quently, the details of any specific incident could be displayed in full. * A visual display of all equipment and stations will be present on a CRT. The display will show the updated status of each unit or station as main- tained by dispatcher keyboard entry or by field units equipped with push- button status control heads. * Message capability will be provided between all operator CRT terminals. Messages may also be used to append additional information to an active incident. * Full system security will be provided by an operator sign-in and sign .-out' procedure. This will result in the computer system automatically attaching the operator identification with all incident and message activity gener- ated at each operator position. * Capability for remotely located terminals for distribution of information 0 025;4 6-3 and for generating copies of system files, incidents, or unit activity • in the vicinity of operational personnel. * Back-up disk or complete back-up computer to minimize system down time. * Automate the present manual system of dispatching and desired improve- ments, including calltaking, dispatching, and status maintenance as a minimum standard. * Capabilities for single point dispatch (single dispatcher can accomplish all tasks, i.e. calltaking, dispatching, and status keeping) , with the ability to separate functions and expand and vary as necessary. * Capability for Fire District personnel to make on-site additions, changes, and deletions to all data base files (street, area code, units, etc.) . * Not lose required information (unit status, incidents in progress, data base) due to CAD system failure by maintaining CRT displays, printouts, etc. * Ability to process simultaneous incidents by priority and time received. ' * Require no special knowledge as a pre-requisite to operate the system. * Ability to distribute information to selective remote terminals. • * Minimize total radio transmission time (digital and voice) . * Reduce total dispatcher work load. 0025:) 6-4 * Be cost effective. The over-all performance objective of the CAD system is to completely process an incident within 45 seconds 80% of the time and 60 seconds 99% of the time. Included in the process time shall be the following steps: 1. Interrogate caller. 2. Enter information. 3. verifv information. 4. Display incident information and suggested response_ 5. Dispatch units. 6. Dispatch received by units. 0040 6-5 6.2 SUGGESTED SYSTEM SOFTWARE DESIGN The purpose of this sub-section is to provide a description of the functional requirements of the application software for the CAD system. Significant visi- bility of application softwaxe development is required by the project team_ To attain the required level of visibility, it is desirable that design and testing of all computer programs be accomplished within 50 driving miles of the District office in Pleasant Hill, California. If this is not the case, state where the programming will be done. All working materials, such as flow charts, listings, handwritten narratives, etc., shall be made available for examination by project personnel, or staff if requested. These working documents in themselves are not considered to be final contract system documentation. Three weeks prior to the formal delivery date for a given document, the con- tractor shall provide a draft copy of -subject document for a preliminary re- view by the project management team. Vendors proposing to produce the application software,by modification of existing software, should include as part of their proposal, operators manuals and external description of the existing software. These should include flow charts, system narratives, and file record layouts for the system. It is desirable that application programs be written in COBOL; however, other common languages may be acceptable. 6.2.1 OVER-ALL DESCRIPTION The CAD system provides for real-time data capture of incident and resource activity through the use of CRTAeyboard terminals. These terminals are 00257 6-6 located at each operating position and provide the human interface between the • CAD system and operating personnel. Three types of operating positions are used in the system; calltaker, dispatch, and command. Calltakers answer calls from citizens, other agencies, and field units, deter- mine the nature of the call, and decide whether units from the District are re- quired. If not, the caller is transferred or referred or the information is relayed to the appropriate agency. If the call is for the District, the appro- oriate information is entered into the system. Each calltaker position is equipped with one CRT/keyboard terminal and is used to enter incident informa- tion into the system. This information is entered against .an incident format. When an incident is entered, the system verifies the incident location, deter- mines city, area code, etc. and routes the incident to the dispatcher via queue. A dispatcher's primary function is to assign and dispatch units to an incident and to maintain unit status. Each dispatch position is equipped with two CRT displays and one keyboard. One CRT is used to continually display the status of resources, while the other CRT is a Working CRT for incident information. This CRT is also used, along with the keyboard, to enter unit assignments, unit status, and other information into the system. Any dispatcher can also perform all calltaker functions. Command position functions are to include all calltaker and dispatcher functions though the primary use will be as a display monitor. 6.2.2 SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS Normally the one dispatcher will both take a call and make the necessary dis- patch. Capabilities shall be provided to permit any single position the capa- bilities of processing a citizen's request for service completely at that posi- OU258 6-7 tion. However, during times of high activity, either multiple incidents or • large call volume, it is necessary to separate calltaking, dispatching, and status functions. By the use of special commands, each position shall be able to designate itself as a calltaker or a dispatcher position and be pri- marily assigned by the computer to handle the tasks associated with that function. 6.2.2.1 CALLTAKER FUNCTIONS Each calltaker position shall be equipped with one CRT/keyboard terminal. This terminal shall be used for and is limited to the functions described below. 6.2.2.1.1 OPERATOR LOG ON AND OFF Commands shall be provided for terminals to be logged on and off the system. The Log On command shall provide for entry of an operator identification num- ber, which is checked against a user authorization file. If the user is in the file, a blank screen shall be displayed; otherwise, the system shall re- spond with an error message. The Log Off command shall cause all other com- mands to be illegal except for a valid Log On command. 6.2.2.1.2 INCIDENT ENTRY AND VERIFICATION OF LOCATION An Incident Format display and Display Request command or function key shall be provided to facilitate the entry of geographic and incident information into the system. Upon typing in of the necessary incident location information, the system shall verify that the entered location does exist within the system and it ishall display all required information associated with that location includ- ing the required assignments and move-ups. 00450 6-8 Location entry shall be as simple as possible and require a minimum of typing keystrokes and spelling ability. An incident location shall be entered and verified in one of four manners. 1. Direct address entry - i.e. 1234 Main Street. 2. Street and cross street names - i.e. North Main/Geary Road. . 3. Location name (limited file) - i.e. Concord Pavilion. 4. Box alarm number - i.e. 1234. If a unique match is found for the inputted identifier(s) , the system should directly produce the information described in the Completion of Address Veri- fication Section. This search may be instituted on only a partial entry with all locations meet= ing the criteria set by CCCFPD displayed in a menu form for selection. A. search routine shall have some automatic error detection capabilities in the event of a "miss" and shall return to the operator a menu presentation of valid possibilities for operator selection. The address validation search shall be based on the following inputs in the order ranked. 1. Street name. 2. Address number (specific or number range) . 3. Cross street. 4. City or community. If, for example, the street name and address number are found to be valid, but not the crass street.or the commlnity, the system shall assume that the address 00250 6-9 given is correct and shall disregard the cross street and the commiunity as inputted. Location name search shall be capable of search on common name (i.e. Cowell Park) or type of location (i.e. park) . All requirements and rules above for an address search apply. The location search should use the address to enter into normal street files. Municipal fire alarms and private alarms are also received at the Commnnica- tions Center. A command or function key shall be provided,for entering alarm number whereby the system shall retrieve the information associated with the alarm, enter it into the appropriate fields of the incident format, and con- tinue with the normal routines_ 6.2.2.1.3 COMPLETION OF ADDRESS VERIFICATION Upon location verification, at least the following file information shall be displayed on the CRT for the dispatcher. 1. Corrected verified address_ 2. Two cross streets. 3. Commini ty name (postal zone) . 4. Location name and special conditions if available (brief) . S. Area code (structure and wildland) . 6. Map page and coordinates (Cal. coordinate system) . 7. Jurisdictions a. Fire b. Police and Beat # • c. Ambulance zone d. Water company e. Other 0.0261 ,r 6-10 8. All required alarm assignments and move-ups based on the area code_ • 9. Vicinity information - based on the map coordinates or area code to include: a. Hydrant outages. b. Street closures. c. Fumigations. d. Other pending incidents in the vicinity. e. Other - Ag burn, smoke test, detours The incident entry format shall also have fields for at least the following additional information. Incident Entry Information Table Estimated Character Elements Length C Time of Receipt (HMS) 7 C Date (MM/DD/YY) 8 C Incident # (YR-00000) 6 * Address # (000000) 6 * Street name 22 * Apartment # 4 * First cross street 22 C Second cross street 22 - Community 12 - Location name 25 V C Special conditions 80 V • * Incident type 30 V C Incident priority 2 0062 6-11 Estimated Character Elements Length * RP telephone # 8 RP name 15 - RP address 29 - Comments 80 V * Method of alarm receipt 8 * Method of alarm receipt code 2 C Area code - structure 5 C Area code - wildland 5 C Map coordinates 9 Radio frequency 2 C Jurisdictions - Fire 8 C Jurisdictions Police & Beat # 8 C Jurisdictions Ambulance zone 8 C Jurisdictions - Water company 8 C Jurisdictions- other 8 C operator # 5 C Position # 2 Box alarm # 6- Required Requ red operator entry Supplemental operator entry or computer output C Computer file output V Character length may be variable More than one element may be inputted into a single field of the display, if . the system can distinguish between the elements. Incident priorities should be assigned by the CAD system based upon jAq} 6-12 type per criteria set by CCCFPD. If the incident type is not filled in, the system shall default to a structural fire response. Time of receipt shall be entered on the incident format by the system upon bringing up a incident format. Each incident entered into the system shall be numbered on a yearly basis. The system shall assign an incident number upon dispatch. 6.2.2.1.4 INCIDENT REVIEW Each incident shall be retained on the system disk for at least 48 hours. Two classes of incidents will be retained: active incidents, those for which a final disposition has not been entered, and inactive incidents. No incident shall be cleared from the disk until a disposition has been entered, and the incident printed and/or recorded on magnetic tape. An alert message shall be displayed on the Dispatchers CRT screen whenever any incident has been in the active status for more than eight (8) hours (variable) . All incidents in the system shall be recallable and displayable for review or editing. There shall be two basic review displays. One is an incident sum- wary which may be requested by all incidents, by address, by dispatcher I.D. number, or by unit number. The incident summary shall be ordered chronolog- ically from newest to oldest. The summary display shall include the incident number, time, type, priority, units) assigned, incident location, and comments, as a minimum. Since all incidents may not fit on the CRT screen at one time, the capability to page forward and backward shall be provided. i The second type of review display is the Review Specific incident which is re- quested by incident number or unit number if the incident is active. This ll 0'26 6-13 request shall cause the specified incident to be displayed in its original • incident format. This display shall include incident number, units assigned, and any times that have been associated with the incident. An incident dis- played in this format may be edited, new information may be added, or erro- neous information deleted or corrected. The edited incident may then be re- entered into the system. An operator shall be able to edit all fields of information, except for incident number, times associated with the incident, and assigned unit(s) . 6.2.2.1.5 MESSAGE FUNCTION A message function shall be provided within the system so that free form text messages may be sent to an operator, shift, or position whether logged onto the system or not. If an operator is not presently logged on, an alert should be displayed upon log-on. The system shall provide an acknowledgement log of those operators who acknowledge receipt of a message. 6.2.2.1.6 INCIDENT ROUTING AND QUEUE FUNCTIONS Capabilities shall be provided so that a calltaker may place any undispatched or pending incidents into Queue, and forward them to the dispatcher. The dispatcher shall have some visual and audible indication that an incident has been placed in Queue. Through the use of a function key or two letter command, the dispatcher may bring onto his Working CRT a summary of any and/or all incidents in Queue ordered by priority and time received. Upon retrieval of an incident from Queue by the • dispatcher, the Working CRT shall display all information required to execute a normal dispatch. .0026i 6-14 6.2.2.2 DISPATCH FUNCTIONS Each dispatch position shall be equipped with two CRT display units and one keyboard. One CRT shall be used to display the status of units and the CRT with keyboard shall be used as a Working CRT. The proposed design layout of each screen shall be submitted by the vendor. However, both screens should be divided into display areas to optimize display space without sacrificing readability by operators. The Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) system shall perform the following dis- patch functions: 6.2.2.2.1 SUGGESTED RESPONSE FUNCTION The system shall present to the dispatcher, a suggested response based on the incident type, response policies, incident priority, area code, and unit status. The suggested response may be accepted or modified at the dispatcher's discretion. The system shall use the incident type to determine from the response table, the number and types of units to be dispatched. The response file, indexed by the area code in the location information, is then retrieved, along with the status of the units indicated in the response file. After checking the number of type of units required by CCCFPD policies and unit availability (status and priority) the system will automatically fill in a suggested response on the CRT. The suggested response will include available and conditionally available units necessary to fill out the suggested response. A unit listed on the response card on a lower priority response shall become conditionally available on a higher priority incident. A unit conditionally available shall be treated as a dispatchable unit. 0026 6-15 The suggested response assignment shall be determined as follows: a. The suggested response assignment shall be recommended from the normal First Alarm units, if available. b. If a required unit is unavailable from the First Alarm assignment, the " First Alarm move-up replacement units shall be checked for availability. I£ a move-up unit is not available, the same procedure shall be repeated for each subsequent unit of the same type in the response file. The first available unit found shall be used to fill the assignment. The above methods shall also apply when obtaining assignments for higher levels of alarms (i.e.: Second, Third, or Fourth alarms) .. The capability shall be provided to enter an alarm level whereby the system shall determine the required response for that level from the response file and display the assignment and corresponding incident in dispatch format. 6.2.2.2.2 UNIT DISPATCH Once the unit assignment has been determined and displayed on the CRT. screen, the dispatcher shall have the ability to add or delete units from the computer recommended assignments before the dispatch is made. A special function key or command will be provided to initiate the dispatch. The capability shall be provided for the dispatcher to enter an acknowledgement which has been received by voice radio. If the unit(s) acknowledge, the system shall place the unit(s) in the enroute . status, record the time, and update corresponding status displays. If the unit(s) do not acknowledge within an alloted time as stipulated by CCCFPD,. 00267 6-16 the system shall sound and display an alert. 6.2.2.2.3 STATION FUNCTIONS The proper and timely maintenance of.unit and station status is of the utmost importance for the proper allocation of fire district units. A Status CRT will be provided at each dispatcher position (3) . Status CRTs shall constantly show current status of all vehicles (60) and stations (18) (manned or unmanned) . 6.2.2.2.3.1 UNIT AND STATION STATUS DISPLAY The dispatcher should be able to select several different display formats for showing unit or station status. It is desired that the displays should include the following information: A. Units by Incident Number: 1) Incident number_ 2) Incident priority. 3) Incident status. 4) Vehicle designation of units assigned by incident. 5) Unit status. , B_ Units by Station Number: 1) Station number. 2) Manpower available at station (number of firefighters or crews at the station) . 3) vehicle designation of units assigned by station. 4) Current unit status (indicated by display mode, i.e. bright, dim, etc.) . 5) On-the-air indicator (indicated by asterisk). 6) Comments indicator (i.e. out-of-service, repairs, etc_). 7) Units will be shown under new station after move-up. 8) Units by incident number will be shown at bottom of screen for assigned units. � b 6-17 C. Units by Apparatus Type: 1) Apparatus type (i.e. engine, truck, etc.). 2) Vehicle designation of unit by apparatus type. 3) Current unit status (indicated by display mode, i.e. bright, dim, etc.). 4) On-the-air indicator (indicated by asterisk}. 5) Comments indicator (i.e. out-of-service, repairs, etc.). 6) Units by incident number will be displayed at bottom of screen for assigned unit or by showing incident number next to vehicle designa- tion of units. D. Station Status on top of District Map: 1) A computer generated map of CCCFPD would be displayed on the CRT. 2) Station number would appear by approximate location of station in reference to the generated District map. 3) Station status (manned, unmanned) would be indicated by display mode (i.e. bright, dim, etc.). All Consolidated Fire District status information shall be accomplished on single screen displays. All status changes shall be logged and time shall be recorded by the system. Dispatchers shall have the capabilities to manually change any vehicle status -with minimum keyboard interaction, and without interferring with the Working CRT display (possibly through the use of a special status keyboard or command line) . Any change on the Status CRT, whether automatic or manual, shall be reflected on all other Status CRT's. 00269 6-18 Working CRT's shall display limited status information associated with units listed in the response file. Status display modes or indicators shall be the same as displayed on the Status CRT. Status indications include: 1. Unit available for dispatch, either in quarters or on the air. 2. Unit conditionally available - check Status CRT or call. Unit may be out of first-run area, assigned to a lower priority incident, bea reserve unit, or have reduced manpower. 3. Unit not available for dispatch - unit may be on a higher priority incident, unmanned, or out of service. 4. On the air indication. In addition to CCCFPD units, the system shall have the ability to accept the manual entry of and status changes for up to 50 Mutual Aid and O.E.S. units on an additional page of status display. The system shall have future capa- bilities for expansion to keep status on up to 250 units on various display pages with only minor hardware and software modifications. 6.2.2.2.3.2. INCIDENT STATUS The status of each incident will automatically be maintained by the computer. An incident may have one of five statuses: 1. Pending 2. Dispatched 3. Working 4. Under control 5. Closed An incident will have the status pending as soon as it is assigned an incident number. It will maintain this status until a unit is dispatched in response to that incident, i.e. while it is in Queue. It may reassume this status if all 00270 6-19 of the units dispatched to it are re-dispatched to a higher priority incident before the incident is closed. An incident will have the status "Dispatched" after units are dispatched to it, but before the first unit arrives on the scene. As long as at least one unit is at the scene, the incident will have the status "working" or "under control". An incident is "working" until it is reported "under control". An incident is "closed" when no more units are at the scene and the incident is not put back in Queue for re-dispatch as a result of the last unit being re-dispatched to a higher priority incident. 6.2.2.2.3.3 MANPOWER AT STATION STATUS CCCFPDIs manning policies dictate that at some stations one crew (3 men) may man one or both of two (2) different types of units depending on the type of incident. At some other stations, two crews may man two or three different types of units. It is therefore necessary, that the CAD system have the ability to recognize the variable manning characteristics of units and take this into account when recommending a suggested dispatch. Example: Station 11 has an engine and a powerwagon normally assigned, either of which can be manned by the three (3) men (one crew) assigned to that station. Should Engine 11 respond to an incident, powerwagon 11 would automatically be- come unavailable due to being unmanned. If a move-up unit and crew should be relocated to Station 11, powerwagon 11 should then become available for dispatch utilizing the crew from the move-up unit. It is recommended that vendors study the various CCCFPD policies and procedures contained in Appendix A to develop a better understanding of the problem. Vendors are to recommend methods for solving manpower at station status based upon their expertise. pp2'�1 6-20 6.2.2.2.4 UNIT INSERT/DELETE FUNCTIONS The Insert Unit function shall be used to enter specific unit numbers into the system so that they will appear and be statused in the Unit Status display. The Delete Unit function shall be used to remove those units no longer on duty from the display. The insertion and deletion of units may be entered at dis- patch positions at the Communications Center. Deletion of units shall require the use of a special command or password. 6.2.2.2.5 CLOSED_ INCIDENT FUNCTION A command shall be provided to indicate to the system that an incident is closed or finished. This shall cause the system to print and record the incident on disk and place it in inactive status. 6.2.2.2.6 ALERT FUNCTION Some method of audible and visual system alerting shall be provided. Some re- quired alerts or flagging are: 1. Failure of a unit to respond within a specified time of dispatch. 2. Failure of reserves to report to station within a specified time of dis- patch. 3. District coverage has dropped below a pre-determined level. 4. Equipment failure. S. Box- alarm or incidents in Queue. Time parameters for alerts shall be variable. 6.2.2.2.7 PRINT FUNCTION The system shall provide the capability for a dispatcher to request that the contents of either CRT screen be printed on the log printer. ,0,02`2 6-21 6.2.2.2.8 TRAINING MODE The purpose of this mode is to provide a method of training new calltaker and dispatch personnel_ With this mode, any dispatch position may be placed in the training mode via keyboard command. An operator is then able to exer- cise all commands and functions allowable at the corresponding position. This includes access to existing system data such as incidents and status displays. Any changes to existing system data must be stored in a temporary training file so that the live system operation is not affected. A command to terminate the mode makes the position again available for live operation and clears the temporary training file. 6.2.2.2.9 ASSIST FUNCTION The purpose of this mode is to assist operators having difficulty with formats or abbreviations, or for training purposes. The mode shall provide the capa- bility to display at least the following assistance features: A. Fire-type codes and their meanings. B. Geographic data standards (e.g. street types - AV, BL, ST, etc.) C. Command mnemonics and their meanings. 6.2.2.3 COMMAND FUNCTION A CRT will be located in the Plan I Command and Control Room and shall be capable of performing all calltaker/dispatcher functions. In normal use the position shall be limited to display functions, status change functions, and add/delete functions. 6.2.2.4 LOGGING FUNCTIONS 6.2.2.4.1 HARDCOPY PRINTOUTS There shall be at least one logging printer. This printer shall be used, to 00,273 6-22 print at least the following information on an automatic basis. A_ Printer 1 1. Each incident as initially entered. 2. Each incident that is closed (i.e., the final disposition has been entered) _ 3. Each 'status change and time at change. 4. A periodic printout of the complete unit status to simplify recreation of unit status in case of system failure. 5. The contents of any dispatch Working CRT screen by keyboard command. In case of failure of the logging printer, the control terminal or other printer, if provided, shall handle the printouts. 6.2.2.4_2 MAGNETIC TAPE The followinginformation at least, shall be logged and time stamped on magnetic tape on an automatic basis A. Each incident that is closed. B. Each status change and time of change. C. Each operator log on/off. D. Each change to the Special Condition or Vicinity files, including the identification of the person making the change. E. Each change made to the data base, including the identification of the person making the change. 00274 6-23 6.3 OTHER REQUIREMENTS This sub-section describes requirements not previously covered, as well as system limits and response time requirements. 6.3.1. SOFTWARE STRUCTURE The application programs shall be designed and written in a modular fashion. Modular fashion means that each module performs a particular function, and its linkages with other functions are structured such that changes to the internal workings of one module do not reflect themselves into the workings of another module. Modularity also allows for the integration of new program modules with minimum programming effort. Additionally, data buffers shall be allocated such that any memory expansion beyond 64k bytes will not require any modification to program code. It is reasonable to expect, however, that memory expansion may require minimal changes to parameters in the system data base. 6.3.2. DIAGNOSTIC SOFTWARE In case of computer failure, the application software shall include the capability to provide basic diagnostic information prior to a program restart. This diag- nostic information may be printed on either the computer I/O device or line print- er and shall include information such as register contents, stack contents or equivalent, and an identification of the cause of the problem or type of computer halt. 6.3.4 CONTROL TERMINAL The primary use of the control terminal is for program development, system startup and restart, and batch background operations. Additionally, the capability shall be provided to use .this device for on-line or off-line geographic file update, and 00275 6-24 to enter and delete information on the special condition, vicinity files, and other Data Base Files. 6.3.5 SYSTEM RECONSTRUCTION In case of complete failure of the computer system, manual backup procedures would be used to continue the dispatch operation. When the system is restarted, it must be updated to reflect the current status of incidents and units. There- fore, the capability shall be provided at all positions to enter retroactive in- cidents and status information following a restart. This capability shall in- clude the ability to enter associated incident numbers and times. If the sys- tem were down for an extended period, only those incidents that are active need to be entered prior to commencing automated operation. Earlier incidents could then be entered at operator convenience. This capability shall not be available to operators during normal operation and shall be controllable by command at the lead dispatcher position. That is, once all retroactive incidents have been entered, the lead dispatcher would disable this capability until again required. 6.3.6 SYSTEM RESPONSE TIMES The software system shall utilize overlapped input/output and processing to achieve the fastest practical response times. The maximum allowable transaction response times for typical frequently used transactions is given in Table below for (1) a single entry, and (2) for peak loading periods. The single entry maximum response time is the time from pressing the CRT/keyboard enter key until the last character of information has been displayed on the screen, as- suming that no other transactions are being processed. The peak loading period maximum response times must be met greater than 90 percent of the time when the system is processing a variety of transactions including incident entry, assign- 0.0276 6-25 went, and dispatch, manual unit status changes and mobile unit status changes, if provided in an actual operational environment during the peak hour of a day. If these response times cannot be met by the system that the vendor proposes, the specific response times to be met shall be stated in the proposal. Table Of Response Time Requirements Maximum Response Time (Sec) Transaction Average Single Entry Peak Load Display Incident Format 2 3 Address Entry and Response 2 3 Incident Entry and Routing 3 5 Unit Status Change and Display 2 4 Assignment and Dispatch 3 5 (fire station printc�--- -_,-utput need not be completed but must have been started) Incident Summary 2 4 6.3.7 PAGING FUNCTION The capability shall be provided to page forward and backward for all displays that are too large to fit on a CRT screen at one time. Additionally, each page displayed except the last page shall include an indication that there is more undisplayed information. 6.3.8 SYSTEM FILES . The system shall include at least the following major files. 00277 6-26 6.3.8.1 GEOGRAPHIC DATA FILE This file describes the geography of the District in terms of street block faces, the intersection of a street with one or more streets, or the intersection of a street with a non-street feature, e.g. Treat Boulevard and Canal. This file shall also include Street Name Index and Commonplace Index sub-files. This file shall reside on disk and is estimated to require 6,000 entries. In addition to the geography of the District, this file shall also include abutting perimeters of the District's boundaries to within one-quarter to one-half mile. 6.3.8.2 INCIDENT FILE This file contains entries for each incident in the system. Each entry includes both operator entered information, as well as information automatically added by the system, such as date and times. Each incident entry shall be retained on disk for at least 48 hours. This file is estimated to require 100 entries. 6.3.8.3 UNIT HISTORY AND STATUS FILE This file contains an entry for each unit in the system and includes information such as unit identification, unit type, status indications, etc. There shall be entries for at least 250 units. In addition, a subset of this file containing frequently accessed data may be retained in memory. 6.3.8.4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FILE The system shall provide the capability for entry of known special condition infor- mation pertaining to specific addresses. This information shall be stored in the Special Condition file in free form text and linked to the corresponding entry in the Geographic file. This information shall be displayed on the dispatcher's CRT . whenever the location of an undispatched incident is verified and its geographic entry contains a link to the Special Condition file. Entry of this information shall be from the CRT or control terminal at the Communications Center. Each 00278 6-27 entry must include an authorized password for security and accountability. A monthly printout shall be provided for review so that incorrect or no longer valid information may be deleted or corrected. This printout shall include the current contents of the file and each change made during the month, including the date and time of each change and the identification of the person that made the change. This file shall allow for at least 1000 entries of 75 characters each and be expandable. 6.3.8.5 VICINITY FILE The system shall provide the capability for entry of hydrant outages, street closures, and fumigations. This information shall be stored in the Vicinity file in free form text and shall be transmitted as part of any dispatch message based on the corresponding map coordinates. Entry of this information shall be from the CRT or central console and shall include an authorized pass- word for security and accountability. Although this information shall be re- trievable by keyboard command, a weekly printout shall be provided for review so that incorrect or no longer valid information may be deleted or corrected. This file shall allow for at least 100 entries of 75 characters each. 6.3.8.6 RESPONSE CARD AND RESPONSE TYPE Each entry in the Geographic file contains an element defining the response "card" associated with the associated block face. This element is used to index into the Response Card file. This file contains information relating to the units available for assignment. Space for approximately 500 response cards shall be provided in this file with each entry containing an estimated 250 characters. . The number and type of units to be assigned to a fire incident is a function of the type of incident and the area code. A structure fire indicates one type of response, while a grass fire indicates another type of response. This response 002'79 6-28 type information is contained in the Response Type file. Based on the fire type entered by the calltaker and the area code, a response type code is retrieved from the Response Type file. This code is used in con- junction with the Response Card file to recommend an assignment to the dispatcher. This files requires 30 entries. 6.3.8.7 ALARM FILE This file contains information on fire alarms. As a minimum, each entry in this file shall contain the alarm type (radio, Gamewell, ADT, etc.) , alarm address, name of business or establishment if commercial, and owner's,.name, address and telephone. 6.3.8.8 QUICK REFERENCE FILE . This file contains summarized information on various policies, procedures, and generalized information. It shall contain all information presently on the existing Quick Reference cards. This file shall be reviewable at any position through the use of a function key or two letter command. This file is estimated ' to contain 300 entries of 500 characters each. 6.3.8.9 AUTHORIZED USER FILE This file shall contain the name and identification number of each authorized user of the system. It is estimated to require a maximum of 100 entries. 6.3.9 FILE CONVERSION AND BATCH SOFTWARE The following software shall be supplied for performing file conversion and report . generation. For the file conversion programs, data shall be supplied and verified by CCCFPD. However, the vendor shall provide forms and instructions for gathering the data and providing printouts and instructions for verific do 6o so 6-29 6.3.9.1 GEOGRAPHIC FILE PROGRAM SThis program shall provide the capability to prepare the initial Geographic file, update the file through additions, deletions, and changes; and provide a hardcopy printout of the Geographic file for verifications and for backup purposes. This program shall also have the capability to perform automated validation .such as detecting duplicate street name entries and flagging. abnormalities which may or may not be errors. Examples of these abnormal conditions include: A. Street number breaks. B. Street intersects itself. C. Duplicate block faces. D. Unmatched block faces. 6.3.9.2 FIRE ASSIGNMENT PROGRAM This program shall provide the capability to prepare the initial response type and Response Card files, update these files, and provide hardcopy printout of these files for verification and backup purposes. 00281 6-30 6.4 OPTIONS Vendors are requested to propose the following capabilities as options. Prices for these options shall be separate from the baseline system bid. 6.4.1 SYSTEM CAPABILITIES The software shall be designed to accommodate the following capacities: A. 15 cities. B. 40 fire stations. C. 250 fire vehicles. Expansion to these capacities shall not require modification to any program code, but may require minimal parameter changes in the system data base. 6.4.2 FIRE PERSONNEL RECALL FILE This file contains information on fire personnel for recall purposes. Each entry in this file;shall contain at least each person's name, rank and phone number, and the priority for recall. This file is estimated to require a total of 400 entries. 6.4.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS REPORTS This program shall provide the capability to generate the following hardcopy reports on a monthly basis: A. General statistical summary. B. Summary of incidents by area code. C. Summary of incidents by activity (code) . D. Summary of response times of units to specific area codes. 00282 6-31 6.5 FUTURE EXPANSION AND APPLICATIONS It is possible that CCCFPD may expand its dispatching operations within the next ten (10) years. It is desirable for vendors to provide hardware and software which can easily be expanded to meet these needs. Vendors are re- quested to include a statement of the ability of their proposed equipment and software to be expanded to meet these needs on a need-for-need basis. Vendors should indicate specific hardware changes, including computer ex- pansion and/or conversion to an upward compatible computer, and any diffi- culty in doing the conversion (i.e. - major modifications to application programs to match new operating systems software) . Software conversion should be discussed stating the ability of the software to handle the increased load (i.e. degraded response time, etc.) . The CAD system should have the necessary hardware and software capabilities for the following possible future expansions. A. Contract or joint powers dispatching for one or more other fire dis- tricts in Contra Costa County. This could include up to 20 other fire districts which in the aggregate equal approximately three (3) times CCCFPD. B. Computer-to-computer interface capabilities with five (5) police department computers. C. Fire District computer interaction with County Data Processing's IBM 370/155. D. Ability to interface a lighted wall status map showing fire district(s) coverage. This capability should include generation of all commands needed to change the status indicators on such a map. • E. Addition of a second like CPU and necessary hardware and software to provide CAD system redundancy and off main line new application pro- gram 6-32 F. Some new programs might be as follows: • 1. Conversion of a Cobol Program presently on the County computer or creation of a new program to handle local incident reporting and California Fire Incident Reporting System. 2. Fire prevention inspection scheduling and recording programs. 3. Occupancy file of all commercial building and target hazards within the District. 4. Supply Inventory Program. 5. Daily Manpower and Time Log. 6. Remote input terminals at stations, training center and office. 7. Printers in staff vehicles, for down loading occupancy information and hazards. 40281 7 SECTION 7 - BASIC CAD HARDWARE 7.1 COMPUTER HARDWARE This section describes the computer(s), peripherals, data communications equipment, and terminals envisioned for the implementation of fire computer assisted dispatching system for CCCFPD. The description and requirements stated below are to assist vendors in their selection of appropriate hardware. It is expected that vendors will select the best hardware necessary to meet the software objectives of this RFP. All computer system hardware shall be located at CCCFPD Communication Center, except for the remote fire station printers located at each fire station, and mobile digital status units. 7.1.1 FUNCTIONS The central computer system shall consist of Central Processing Unit(s) , disk storage and drive(s) , magnetic tape storage and drive(s) , communication line interfaces and control terminals. Additionally, a line printer, modems, CRT terminals, and logging printers shall be furnished. The exact method of interconnecting or configuring the above -components (e.g., use of dual-port disk controllers, inter-processor data links, bus switches, etc.) is left open to the vendor; however, the following functional require- ments shall be met by any proposed configuration. A. The system Central Processing Unit(s) shall be able to handle the entire CAD system load (i.e. five (5) simultaneous incidents) . If there is the possibility of a degraded mode of operation, the bidder shall describe the cause and the extent of degradation and any manual backup procedures that may be necessary. 00285 7-1 B. During normal operation, the system shall support l6k bytes of batch/background processing with no system degradation or reduc- tion of response times. C. All disk updates (unit status, incident status, etc.) , shall be duplicated on both disk storage units. D. The operating status of the on-line CPU(s) shall be periodically monitored, and in the event of failure, an alarm generated so that manual switchover may be effected, automatic switchover made to another processor, or the manual backup system can be used. 7.1.2 CENTRAL COMPUTER EQUIPMENT The central computer equipment shall consist of at least one computer system comprised of a central processing unit (CPU) , non-volatile memory, disk drive, magnetic tape drive, communications line interfaces, and control terminal. Additionally, a log printer shall be provided. The characteristics required for the CPU and peripherals are described in the following paragraphs. 7.1.2.1 CENTRAL PROCESSING UNITS At least one CPU shall be furnished, meeting the following minimum requirements: A. 64k bytes of internal storage. Actual storage requirements are expected to be determined by the vendor. State type of memory. B. Memory cycle time no greater than 1 microsecond. C. Memory management and protection (block level) . D. Hardware multiply and divide. E. Multi-level automatic priority interrupts. F. A re-start procedure which takes one person no longer than five (5) . minutes to perform. (Automatic re-start preferred) . G. Bootstrap loader from tape and disk. 00285 H. Interval (line frequency) clock. 7-2 I. The CPU(s) shall also have the capability of expanding main memory size to 128k bytes or there shall be available an upward compatible computer in the manufacturer's line that will permit the required main memory expansion. Expansion to 256k bytes is preferred and expansion beyond this capability may be desired. If memory cycle time of expansion memory is slower than the original memory, its cost effectiveness shall be justified. The memory addressing system for the expansion memory shall be the same as for the original memory. Proposals should include an alternative bid for two CPUs with the same require- ments as above; however, it is preferred that all memory shall be protected by parity or some similar method at least to the word level. 7,:1.2.2 DISK STORAGE The CAD system shall have a disk storage comprised of a disk controller and one or more disk drives. The disk sub-system shall have the following charac- teristics: A. Disk controller capable of controlling a minimum of four disk drives. B. one or more drives with a total capacity of at least 10 million bytes. Actual capacity is expected to be determined by the vendor. C. A drive may consist of either removable or fixed storage,. or a com- bination of both. D. Average access time (average track position time plus time for one- half revolution) less than 50 milliseconds. E. Dual-ports for access by a second CPU may be desirable for future operations. 7.1.2.3 MAGNETIC TAPE STORAGE 00287 The CAD system shall have magnetic tape storage comprised of a magnetic tape 7-3 controller and a magnetic tape drive. The magnetic tape storage shall meet the following minimum requirements: A. Industry compatible �i inch. B. Nine track. C. 800 bpi minimum. D. Able to handle up to 10.5 inch reels. E. Transfer rate of at least 20,000 bytes per second. F. Tape controller capable of controlling a minimum of four tape drives. 7.1.2.4 CONTROL TERMINALS The control terminal shall be a keyboard/printer device with the following characteristics: A. At least 30 characters per second print speed. B. Standard paper is preferred (nonthermal and no special developer or toner needed) . C. Standard typewriter alphanumeric key layout. This terminal shall be the primary input/output device for communicating with the vendor-supplied operating system, monitoring and controlling the on-line dispatching system, and for operating the batch off-line system. Each.computer shall have one control terminal. 7.1.2.5 PRINTER A single printer and controller shall be furnished. A printer shall be a medium speed impact type capable of producing multiple copies on standard printer forms, and meet the following minimum requirements: • A. Proposals should include: (1) type of printer (line, character, etc.) 00288 02^ (2) average print speed (200 1pm, 130 cps, etc.) 7-4 (3) print positions available (132 columns, etc.) (4) form sizes accommodated by pin feed tractors (4 to 14-7/8 inches, etc.) B. Character set-64 minimum characters ASCII standard subset, or .equiv- alent 7.1.2.6 COMMUNICATIONS LINE INTERFACES The CAD system shall be able to control a minimum of 24 RS-232C lines via . communications line interfaces or multiplexers. The communications line interfaces or multiplexers may have the following minimum characteristics: A. Strappable character length (per line) . B. Strappable stop bits (per line) . C. Strappable odd/even parity (per line) . D. Strappable data rate up to 9600 bps (per line) . E. Direct Memory Access (DMA) on output data transfer. F. Full modem control capability for at least 24 lines. G. EIA RS-232C interface. 7.1.2.7 WATCHDOG TIMER The computer contractor shall furnish a watchdog timer capability to monitor proper computer operation. The watchdog shall detect failure.of the computer(s) cycling the on-line computer assisted dispatch system software, and shall pro- vide contact closures indicating the system operational status. These contract closures shall be wired to indicator lights and an audible alarm at the dis- patcher's console by the vendor. Under the above basic watchdog system, switch- over to manual operations when computer failed would be performed manually by the dispatcher or other personnel. O.OZ89 7-5 7.1.2.8 COMMUNICATION LINE SWITCHING Included in proposals for a second optional CPU should be a communication line switching unit provided to switch lines from the communication inter- faces on one processor, to the communication interfaces on the other proc- essor. The communication line switch shall meet the following minimum re- quirements: A. Capability to switch EIA RS-232C data up to 9600 bps. B. Switch transparent to the signal transferred. C. Individual line switching and the capability to switch all lines with a master switch. D. Visual indication of each line switch position. E. Switch remains latched in current position on power failure. F. Rack-mounted in computer cabinets. Basic proposal responses shall provide for manual control of the master and individual line switches. Vendors are encouraged to include automatic trans- fer of the master switch based on watchdog timer indication of computer failure as a separate option. 7.1.2.9 MODEMS Modems shall be furnished by the vendor for use with all terminals covered in this RFP. Modems may be either rack-mounted multiple modem units or free standing individual units. Suitable shelves and brackets shall be provided for securely mounting free standing modems in the computer cabinets. Vendors shall specify modem requirements and characteristics. • 7.1.2.10 CABLING The vendor shall provide all required cabling between system units, including cabling from the communication line switch to all CRT and printer terminals 00290 7-6 and modems furnished by the vendor, and to the fire station modems and master • timing source. It is preferred that all cables from terminals-to-line switch, modems-to-line switch, and line switch-to-communication line interface utilize standard data communication connectors (TEN Cinch DB-25 P/S or equivalent) . Transmission characteristics of all cables supplied shall provide error-free transmission over the maximum cable lengths encountered .at the designated data rate. Interbay cables in the computer cabinets shall be provided with sufficient slack to allow any sliding chassis to be extended to its normal maintenance position. Cables to terminals shall be provided with a minimum of 10 feet of slack from the agreed upon terminal locations to allow for possi- ble future relocation of consoles or terminals. 7.1.2.11 CABINETS Computer cabinets of uniform size and construction shall be supplied by vendors for mounting all computer related equipment which is not free standing. Equip- ment mounted in the cabinets shall include all modems and communications line switches in addition to the actual computers and peripherals. Cabinets shall be furnished with all required doors, end panels, front panels, anti-tip legs, level adjusting legs and blowers. 7.1.2.12 POWER AND GROUNDING Vendors shall specify the power requirements of their proposed configurations and the extent of any necessary electrical work (i.e. additional outlets, re- wiring, etc.) . Systems that utilize only 120 VAC single phase power are pre- ferred; however, systems that require two or three phase power will not neces- sarily be excluded. • Vendors shall price all necessary electrical work as an option, should CCCFPD choose to have the vendor make the changes. 00291 7-7 Grounding at the Communications Center will include separate ground busses • for power ground and signal ground. Grounding of the complete computer sys- tem through the green power cable ground wire is not acceptable. Vendors shall specify their proposed method of handling power grounds and signal grounds. 7.1.2.13 ENVIRONMENTAL All computer equipment shall be capable of operation within a temperature range of 160 to 320 C and a relative humidity range of 20 percent to 80 per- cent. 7.1.3 CONMUNICATIONS CENTER Ti EPMINAr c CRT and printer term naIs to be furnished and installed should be of sufficient quantities and functions to accomplish all tasks covered by this RFP. It is preferred that all terminals be manufactured by a single supplier, and model number variations shall only reflect differences between stand-alone, rack mount, and receive-only terminals. All terminals shall be supplied in a color to be designated by the CCCFPD CAD Project Manager. In the following sub-sections the minimum requirements for each of these terminals are described. As an alternative, vendors may propose terminals which exceed these minimum requirements by including more extensive editing features, function keys, or larger display screens. 7.1.3.1 COMPLAINT AND DISPATCHER CRT/KEYBOARD There shall be three complaint and dispatcher CRT/keyboard terminals capable of being mounted in existing consoles. Two other terminals shall be stand-alone units for desk top mounting. The vendor shall have the responsi- bility for providing suitable shelves and brackets to mount the terminals in. • 00202 7-8 The terminals shall meet the following minimum requirements: • A. Minimum 1920 characters: 24 lines x 80 columns. B. Non-glare CRT screen--11 inch diagonal, minimum (14" desirable) . C. Self-contained memory. D. Alphanumeric keys in standard typewriter layout. E. Cursor controls. F. Cursor read/write by computer. G. Field protect and tabbing. H. At least two display modes (bright, dim, blinking, reverse video) . (4 modes desirable) . I. Audible alarm. J. Switch selectable data rate up to 9,600 bps. K. Detachable keyboard. L. RS-232C interface. M. Individual brightness and contrast controls. N. Slave video tap_ 7.1.3.2 DISPATCH CONSOLE RECEIVE-ONLY CRT Each dispatcher console position (3) shall include a receive-only CRT in adds- tion to the CRT/keyboard terminal. The receive-only CRT shall have an inde- pendent refresh memory and controller. The characteristics of the receive only CRT shall be the same as the non-keyboard related characteristics of the complaint and dispatcher CRT/keyboard terminal. The vendors shall have the responsibility for providing suitable shelves and brackets for mounting the receive-only CRTs in existing dispatch consoles. • 7.1.3.3 LOGGING PRINTER At least one medium-speed printer shall be installed. This printer shall be used to print incident and unit status activity and will be located in the W293 7-9 Operations Room physically close to dispatch personnel. Two logging printers, • one for status changes and one for incident activity, may be desirable. Ac- cordingly, consideration must be given by vendors to the amount of noise gener- ated by the printers. Characteristics desired for these printers include: A. At least 30 characters-per-second output speed. B. Quiet operation. C. Sprocket feed. D. EIA RS-232C interface. E. Special paper not required. F. Printers may be furnished with individual floor stands or can be mounted on stands or console shelves to be furnished by the vendor. 7.1.4 INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS .The technical interface requirements for computer and peripheral equipment to be installed in the equipment room should be fully described in the pro- posal. Technical interface requirements for CRT and printer terminals should also be fully described in the proposal. • 002 9 7-10 7.2 UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SYSTEM (UPS) • As an option, vendors shall submit an opinion, description, and price on the desirability of a solid state Uninterruptable Power System (UPS) . 7.2.1 UPS Capabilities The UPS would be used as a power source for the complete CAD system, including; processor(s),, disk drive(s) , magnetic tape drive(s) , control console, -log print- ers, CRT's, all peripheral controllers and any other accessories associated with the CAD system. The UPS would consist of a rectifier/charger, battery bank, '-inverter, synchro- nizing equipment, protective devices and accessories to provide regulated un interruptable electrical power to the critical load. It includes all mechanical and electrical devices that will automatically provide continuity of electrical power without interruption upon failure or deterioration of the primary power. 7.2.2 Power Requirements The system should be sized to meet the power requirements for the complete CAD system for a minimum of 10 minutes following failure of the primary power'.source. 0029 7-11 7.3 OPERATING SYSTEM AND RELATED SOFTWARE • A real-time operating system shall be supplied to operate the computer with the following characteristics: a. -Multiprogramming. b. Re-entrant input/output handlers. c. Real-time priority task scheduling and operation. d. Batch background processing. e. Task protection. f. Output spooling. g. File management. h. System library routines. i. Device independence coding. The operating system shall be used as the over-all system monitor and scheduler. It shall be used to .monitor the status of the computer and schedule foreground/. background tasks. Operator intervention shall be minimized during normal pro- gram cycle time. However, when batch processing or program development is de- sired on the computer, the operating system shall allow_those tasks, while still retaining the operational software priorities in case a dispatch request is entered. In addition to the real-time operating system, the following software packages shall be provided: a. Program loader. b. Diagnostic package to aid in checking out hardware. d. Debugging program to aid in isolating software errors. d. Mathematical subroutines. • e. Editor package for updating programs. f. Utility programs for file handling. 00296 g. Any other language processor or utility required to maintain the 7-12 application software. Methods for program compiling and assembling should be specifically described in the proposal. 0029 / 8 SECTION 8 - ADD-ON MODULES 8 ADD-ON MODULES This section describes three (3) add-on modules, in addition to the CAD hard- ware and software._ They are mobile status, station printers and radio alarm box interface modules. Thesemodules are to be priced individually by the vendors as options, should it be necessary for CCCPPD to purchase the entire system in phases. Each module shall include both hardware and software necessary for system integration. 8.1 MOBILE STATUS MODULE A Mobile Status module shall be-provided to reduce the dispatcher workload, minimize air time necessary for status transmission, and improve status docu- mentation and updating. The Mobile Status module shall,include Mobile Status encoders/decoders in each vehicle within this District on which status is kept, base station encoding/decoding equipment, computer interfaces and software re- quired to support the system. 8.1.1 HARDWARE 8.1.1.1 MOBILE A. Mobile Status encoder/decoders are to be provided in each Fire District first-run units, reserve units, spare units, and selected staff and support units (60 units). 0098 Mobile Status encoder/decoders are to be Motorola's "Modat"Mobile Status 8-1 head, Coded Communications Reporter IIA, or other like and comparable • unit with the following minimum features. 1. 8 status capability minimum, plus 2 message capability desirable. 2. Automatic unit identification of all voice transmissions. 3. Clear channel sensing. 4. Data validity check at both base and mobile unit (hand shaking). S. Multi-level I.D. codes, 300 minimum. 6. Compatibility with the District's present Motorola MOTRAC and MOCOM 70 Mobile radios and frequencies. 7. Retransmission of unacknowledged signals. 8. Ability to call selected units from Communications Center. B. Mobile Status heads are to be installed in Fire District vehicles by District personnel, provided installation requires no more than four (4) man-hours per unit. 8.1.1.2 BASE STATION A. Base station encoder/decoders and base station radio interface unit(s) shall receive signals from mobile units on either of two primary Dis- trict radio frequencies. . Unit(s) shall be expandable to four (4) fre- quency capability. B. Vendors shall be responsible for determining and matching all inter- facing requirements to the CAD hardware and base station transceivers. 8.1.2 SOFTWARE All necessary software shall be provided to support all necessary hardware. • Software shall also be provided to support the following operations: A. Display on the Status CRT, any and all status changes automatically inputted by a Mobile Status head. Form and format to be the same as 00299 8-2 described in the CAD status sub-section (6.2.2.2.3) . • B. Decode and display on the Status CRT any unit I.D. that transmits a voice radio message. C. Decode and display on the Status CRT any unit that transmits a digital message, if provided. D. Display the channel that the unit is transmitting on. E. Dispatchers shall have the capability to change functional unit identification, (i.e. E-14) associated to a unit number, (i.e. 124) and Mobile Digital I.D. number. F. Status/messages may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Responding. 2. Arrived at scene (10-97) . 3. Available at scene. 4. Moving up. 5. Red (out of service) . 6. Yellow (conditional availability) . 7. Green (available on the air) . 8. White (in quarters) . 8.1.3 OPTIONS A. As an option, vendors should describe and price a total stand-alone automatic status system that inputs into the CAD system. A stand- alone system would support Status CRT's, a logging printer, be stand-alone upon CAD failure, and support the automatic status inputted by field units. B. Vendors are encouraged to submit as additional options, descriptions • and prices for mobile status hardware that differs from that already proposed. This may include, more or less, status/messages, other types of hardware within the same manufacturer's line, or hardware 90300 8-3 from another manufacturer_ • 8_1.4 USE OF OTHER HARDWARE If vendors have any objections to utilizing Mobile Status hardware, other than that they primarily propose, they should so state in the proposals. • 00341: s' t#'r'`F r 8-4 8-2 STATION PRINTER MODULE • This module shall include remote printers at various locations for the dis- semination of dispatch and routine information. Printers shall operate on dedicated supervised voice grade telephone lines or microwave channels to each location and the printer sub-system should qualify as a primary means of dispatch in accordance with N.F.P.A. Pamphlet 73 and I.S.O. requirements. Remote printers shall be located in each fire station (17) and shall have some form of an acknowledgement feature. Data lines to the printer shall be processor controlled, with the capabilities for printing in all or selected stations. The system shall initiate any station's alarm devices on a dis- patch, but not for a routine message. 8.2.1 HARDWARE A. Printers shall provide a hard copy of the dispatch to all involved stations within 15 seconds from the time the dispatcher transmits the alarm. B. No special paper shall be required for the printer and it shall be capable of providing multiple copies. C. Character type shall be clear and easily readable as determined by this District. D. It is preferred that printers operate on floated battery power at least in an emergency mode to initiate station alarms.. E. The District shall be responsible for providing the telephone lines, and/or microwave equipment. F. An option of remote printers in police dispatch centers (5) shall be priced as a separate item. Police printers would print dispatch information in all centers with some type of alerting device to sig- nal an incident within their respective jurisdiction. 0.032 8-5 8.2.2 SOFTWARE . Vendors shall provide all necessary software to support the printer system. 8.2.2.1 PRINTER FUNCTIONS Station printers shall be used for the following functions: A. Receive Incident Information on a Dispatch. This printout shall be automatically generated and transmitted when the dispatcher has entered an assignment to an incident. This printout shall occur only at the stations involved. The dispatch printout at any fire station shall include, as a mini- mum, the incident type, location, comments, special conditions, vicinity information, incident number, and all units to respond. Additionally, any unavailable units in the normal response shall also be printed and appropriately identified. For example, if the normal response is Engine 1, Engine 2 and Truck 1 (E1, E2, and Tl) , and E2 is not available, and E3 is the next available replacement, the printout might appear as follows: E1, [E2], Tl, E3. B. Routine Message. This printout shall occur whenever a free form routine message is sent to selected or all stations. C. Receive Test Message. This printout is used to test the teleprinter circuit and shall be transmitted whenever the dispatcher enters the test command. D. Acknowledge Message Receipt. A method shall be provided to acknow- ledge receipt of dispatch test and routine messages. 8.2.2.2 STATION PRINTER TEST r A command shall be provided to cause the automatic transmission of .A "cannad test message to all fire station printers eitheev individually or in r �l 4 B-6 bination. if an acknowledgemdnt of receipt of these messages is not received within 60 seconds (variable parameter) , an alert message shall be displayed to the dispatcher indicating which station or stations do not respond. 'o"y tr !4A 8-7 8.3 RADIO ALARM BOX INTERFACE MODULE The module shall include an interface and log of the Municipal Radio Alarm Box System. 8.3.1 HARDWARE A. A digital interface shall be provided between the existing OREMCO radio alarm box decoder/recorder and the CAD computer, and not interfere with the normal operation of the existing equipment. It is the vendor's responsibility to determine and match the inter- face requirements to the hardware. Vendors shall describe in their proposal how this interface is to be accomplished. 8.3.2 SOFTWARE 8.3.2.1 FUNCTIONS Radio Alarm Box module software shall support the following operations: A. Receive and decode digital input from the interface unit. B. Determine whether the signal is for an alarm, a supervisory signal, or a normal 24-hour check-in. C. Display an alert on each dispatchers Working CRT indicating that a box alarm is pending. The message display must be such that its display on the CRT does not interfere with any existing displays or actions being done on the Working CRT. D. The dispatcher shall accept the pending radio box alarm by the depression of one (1) function key or by entering a two-letter command. E. The depression of the function key or command shall act as an input into the CAD' system-exactly .as if the boxalarmnumbersP_n, tered X 8-8 manually. The CAD system shall then process and display the radio box alarm • in the same manner as any other manually entered box alarm number. 8.3.2.2 LOGGING There shall be provided in the radio alarm box module an automatic internal logging feature of all 24-hour radio alarm box "check-ins" and/or low battery warnings. A. The "log" shall have capacity for a minimum of 300 radio alarm boxes. B. The internal "log" shall dump and print out once each 24 hours, a listing of all radio alarm box numbers, and the time of each radio box "check-in" and it's battery condition. An additional printout shall list, by exception, all radio alarm boxes that did not check- in within the 24-hour period. 8.3.3 PENDING ALERT The radio alarm box sub-system shall display a "pending box" alert. on the Working CRT within two (2) seconds of receipt of a radio alarm box alarm at the OREMCO Decoder. ronn llVyV' ? 9 • SECTION 9 - PROPOSAL GENERAL CONDITIONS 9.1 ISSUING OFFICE This Request for Proposal (RFP) is released by CCCFPD. The Project Manager has issued the RFP and is the sole point of contact for this procurement action. Vendors are instructed specifically to contact no other person within CCCFPD with regard to any aspect of this procurement prior to public announce- ment of award. Proposals and all correspondence relating to this RFP shall be submitted to: Contra Costa County Fire Protection District 2010 Geary Road Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Attention: Roy A. Bell, Inspector Project Manager Telephone: (415) 939-3400 9.2 INCURRING COSTS CCCFPD will not reimburse recipients of the RFP for costs incurred in proposal preparation, presentations, or contract negotiations. 9.3 INQUIRIES Inquiries concerning any areas which, in the vendor's opinion, require clarifi- cation or correction shall be directed to Project Manager. Relevant data con- cerning the communications/dispatch operations of CCCFPD insofar as this RFp is concerned will be made available to assist prospective bidders on a question- and-answer basis. 9.4 PROPOSAL CONFERENCE 00307 A Proposal Conference for computer aided dispatch procurement package will be held in the Conference Room of CCCFPD's District Headquarters located at 2010 Geary Road, Pleasant Hill,' California on .April ;,28, 1978, at 9:00 a.m., Pacific 9-1 Standard Time. Written inquiries received three working days before the conference will receive first consideration. Other written inquiries will then be addressed and oral questions answered as time allows. 9.5 CLOSING DATE Vendor's proposals must be received by the Project Manager not later than 5:00 p.m. , Pacific Daylight Time, May 22,1978. 9.6 REJECTION OF PROPOSALS CCCFPD reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted in response to this Request for Proposal. 9.7 PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE PERIOD Proposals must state the period of time for which they are valid and .may be accepted by CCCFPD. A proposal offering less than ninety (90) calendar days for acceptance from the closing date for receipt of proposals may be considered nonresponsive and may be rejected. 9.8 PROPOSAL FORMAT Vendors shall submit their proposals in the format contained in Section 10 Proposal Format. 9.9 ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL CONTENT CCCFPD may wish to incorporate the successful vendor's complete proposal (or portions thereof) into the subsequent contract by reference or otherwise. Proposals are to be prepared in a manner calculated to permit such incorporation. 9.10 ORAL PRESENTATIONS 11.V OU oral presentations to supplement the Vendor!-s.proposal may ,be re 9-2 during the evaluation process. • 9.11 RIGHTS TO SUBMITTED MATERIAL All responses, inquiries or correspondence relating to this RFP, and all reports, charts, displays, schedules, exhibits and other documentation pro- duced by the vendors will become .the property of CCCFPD when received by the Project Manager. 9.12 ANNOUNCEMENT OF AWARD Announcement of the contract award will be made by CCCFPD. This announcement will be made after notification to all responsive proposers of the status of their proposal. 9.13 NEWS RELEASES News releases pertaining to this procurement shall not be made without prior CCCFPD approval, obtained through the Project Manager. 9.14 NUMBER OF COPIES Vendors shall submit fifteen (15) copies of their technical proposals. Ten (10) copies of price proposals shall be submitted. Five (5). copies of sample con- tracts shall be submitted. 9.15 RIGHT TO RETAIN A CONSULTANT CCCFPD shall have the right to retain consultant firms and/or Contra Costa County staff personnel in an advisory capacity to assist in the evaluation of the proposals submitted in response to this RFP, to review the progress reports • and technical reports submitted by the contractor, and to assist the Project in other matters. 4Q�Q9 f'�i 5: ! 4? ht > iti t,E 3,s r -;� r''r�-3h="n „L?r +ssi�ie r`s'�•� `?.. .et... n 5 r � tLt ,.wi 4 `i:4 t S$r;''Y+.�.b ln•z�.'i }c.k';'. S.3 , .t.....t..,t�.a i.:a ,..,..,._ _ .,,.. ; .. .. .»?,r sCi}Y,.Fw�-.>rK,;. ,ili .._.,s.,e's,:7 �'Y�v4tt_ ,r`,;f (a ....- ,. .. ,. .:.�. ..a,L:t^...v'',4 .•L7Stft•3' fF .. . ,.... .., t...tt�i 9-3 9.16 FUNDING Funding for all or part of this RFP maybe contingent upon acceptance of specific budget requests. 9.17 CONTRACTS Any contract to be prepared as a result of the RFP will conform to the require- ments of CCCFPD policies and the policies of Contra Costa County to include all revisions. 10 SECTION 10- PROPOSAL FORMAT Proposals shall be submitted in the format outlined below and, as a minimum, include the information described in each section. Three separate proposal documents are desired for each procurement package: , (1) Technical Proposal, (2) Price Proposal, and (3) Sample Contract. 10.1 TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Section I: Business Organization The full name and address of your organization and any branch office or other subordinate element that will perform an appreciable portion of the work must be stated. If appropriate, state whether you are licensed to operate in the State of California. Section II: Authorized Negotiators Include the name, position held within your organization, or subordinate element, and telephone number of persons authorized to negotiate the proposed contract. Section III: Statement of the Problem State your understanding of the major problems presented by this RFP and your proposed role in solving these problems. Describe the technical and managerial approach proposed to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. Section IV: Technical Description In this section, provide a technical description of the equipment and software to be delivered under this contract. The technical description should include block schematics of the proposed system configuration, and preliminary floor plan and mechanical layouts Provide specification sheets with exact maka and f )� 10-1 model for each equipment item to be delivered. Detailed equipment maintenance manuals and software manuals need not be submitted with proposals; however, CCCFPD reserves the right to request such manuals during the proposal evalua- tion period, if required. The technical description should provide a description of the performance levels which the proposed design will achieve, and a description of why the proposed design is most suitable for CCCFPD. The technical description should also include any specific analysis or technical materials requested in this RFP. All alternatives and options., either requested by CCCFPD or suggested by vendors should be grouped together in one sub-section of this section. Each alternative or option should be described together with a recommendation by the vendor as to why it should be selected or deleted. This section should also include a description of the acceptance test procedure to be performed on each major equipment item, and the acceptance test procedure to be performed on the complete sub-system delivered by the contractor. Section V: Work Plan and Schudule Describe your plan for accomplishing the work. Indicate the number of man weeks you have allocated to each major task. Include a time related schedule chart showing each major milestone, task, and decision point in your plan. Indicate the steps you will take in performing (where applicable) the detail design, design approval, fabrication, factory testing, installation, acceptance tests, documentation, and warranty on each of the major, tasks. 401'' � 3*, 10-2 Describe any limitations you may impose on the CCCFPD dispatch operations during installation, testing and acceptance period. Clearly identify all assumptions on site availability used in your proposal. Section VI: Management Summary Include the name and position held within your organization, or subordinate element, of key management, sales, engineering, or service personnel assigned to this project 10% or more of their time. Any subcontractors to be utilized must be clearly identified and a responsible representative from each subcon- tractor assigned to the Project. Section VII: Related Corporate Experience As part of your proposal, include a brief, but concise statement of your firm's experience in procurement endeavors of a similar magnitude and nature. The statement should emphasize experience with firefighting agencies in the United States, preferably on the West Coast. Each related project summary should include the name of personnel to contact concerning the project, and the current status, or completion date of the project. Section VIII: Manpower The qualifications of key personnel to be assigned to this project should be presented in this section. State the primary work location of assigned per- sonnel during the time they will be engaged in this project, and estimate the percent of time each individual will be assigned to this project. Identify individuals by name and title, and provide resumes of all these personnel, including related project experience. The related project experience should identify for whom the work was performed and the year in which it was completed. Each vendor shall submit a .statement on availability and conditions, if any, of 10-3 securing the assistance of factory service representatives for solving difficult system or equipment problems (excluding maintenance) . Section IX: Additional Information and Comments Include any other information that is believed to be pertinent but not speci- fically required elsewhere. Section X: Financial Statement Each vendor shall submit a certified report such as an annual report reflecting the balance sheet and earnings report of the company. 10.2 PRICE PROPOSAL The price proposal for each procurement package should quote a fixed price for the vendors base-line configuration, exclusive of state and federal taxes. As a separate line item state the applicable state and federal taxes. Provide a separate line item with fixed price quotation for each alternative or option proposed, whether required in this RFP or offered by the vendor. Each alternative or option itemized in the Price Proposal should be referenced to the applicable technical description in the Technical Proposal. Provide a price breakdown of the base-line bid showing the following: a. Price per unit for each major deliverable item. b. Installation costs not included in a. above. c. Engineering and coordination services. d. Documentation. e. Warranty. provide a separate per unit price quotation for maintenance of the base-line .... ...... 10-4 system for a one year period commencing with the warranty expiration. The condition and terms under which such maintenance will be performed shall be stated. 10.3 SAMPLE CONTE2ACT Venders shall submit a sample contract, the purpose of which is to shorten the negotiations between the selected vendor and CCCFPD. Additionally, the vendor will be required to furnish a "Bond of Faithful Performance", in an amount equal to the total dollar value of the contract upon issuance of a contract. ll SECTION 11 - PROCUREMENT PROCESS 11.1 PROPOSAL EVALUATION All proposals received will be evaluated by an Evaluation Committee. Evaluation criteria will be developed to determine the ability of proposals to meet CCCFPD's needs as per this RFP (but will not be made available to vendors) and a team of evaluators, including County staff, will evaluate each proposal. The evaluation criteria will emphasize the ability to meet the needs of CCCFPD, the responsiveness of proposals to this RFP, the proposed imple- mentation schedule, and cost. Field-proven equipment and computer software are preferred over products not yet demonstrated in actual service. Also, modification or adaptions of field-proven hardware and software will have advantages over totally new products. For other than proven CAD systems, the contractors' managerial and technical capability, as well as the ap- proach proposed to meet the requirements, will be carefully evaluated. Other factors such as ability to meet delivery dates, quality of work per- formed in the past, and general competence of the contractor will be scru- tinized very carefully by CCCFPD. Consideration will be given to the firms' integrity, record of past performance, financial, and technical resources or accessibility to other essential resources. selection of the successful proposal is solely the responsibility of CCCFPD. 00316 11.2 NEGOTIATION AND CONTRACTING Negotiations between firms sproposals and the.,contract ' agency r r t 11-1 shall be governed by CCCFPD policies, and generally accepted practices for • equipment and software procurement. During negotiations the exact options or alternatives to be procured by CCCFPD will be defined, interfaces defined with other systems, and final contract language established. It is intended that during contract negotiations, a payment schedule will be negotiated with the successful vendor, based upon completion of identi.fable milestones and tasks, as described in the vendor's proposal. 11.3 PROPOSALS SHALL BE FINAL The proposals received shall be the basis for CCCFPD to select a vendor to provide the Computer Aided Dispatching System. All proposals will be con- sidered final and all prices will be considered to be the lowest contract price available from the vendor. • 31 YZi b SECTION 12 - SUMMARY This document has been provided to assist vendors in presenting Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) System proposals to CCCFPD. Vendors are encouraged to present proposals based on this request which im- prove CCCF'PD's dispatching system. CCCFPD desires to acquire a Computer Aided Dispatching (CAD) System which provides the public with the best fire service at the least cost by Providing the dispatcher with the highest level of computer informational support at a reasonable cost. The proposals received in response to this request will be used by CCCFPD to determine the best system available for CCCFPD. i ,n_ Appendix A Manual Dispatching System Documentation, Policies, and Procedures Appendix A contains documentation of the present manual system, including flow charts, sample incident, 'record layouts, sample documents, and selected District policy and procedures. I • SECTION A-1 Present Manual System Documentation and Flow Charts ;i i t ti �yy C014TRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DISPATCHING RECORDS INDEXING FLOWCHART NOVEMBER 1, 1977 INCIDENT INCIDENT TO CFIRS LOG REPORT CITIZEN COMPLAINT ' 1 INITIAL INCIDENT DATA STREET RESPONSE DISPATCH TO APPARATUS CARDS CARDS (VOICE) RADIO i REPORTS [ELEPHONEI HDISTRICT ,*> PLAN UXILIARY STATUS UXILIAR STREET BOX IRECTORY ONE RESPONSE BOARD TATUS BOX ALARM DATA FILES CENTRAL CARDS STATION TAKE EQUIPMENT MARC INDICATED ALARMS CARDS ACTION * INCLUDES DIRECT ALARMS , , ,1 ., .....- -. _. : - -_ ... ._. -._ s ,,--. : :.. , ., ,r• �q ., tet. Files and Groupings as Per Flow Chart and Reference Table A. Initial. Incident Information B. Street Card C. Box Alarm Cards D. Equipment Supervision Card (MARC) E. Response Cards E1 Response Flip Chart F. Status Board G. Dispatch H. Incident Log I. Incident Report J.' Plan 1 K. Fire District Mag Telephone:Directories L. Standard M. Reverse N. Inverse Auxiliary Status Files 0. Spare and O.E.S. Status Board P. Personnel Status Board Q. Air 'I Schedule R. Shift Schedule and Assignments 'Auxiliary Response Data S. Communications Policy and Procedures T. Administrative Notes U. Quick Reference ,Cards 7. ii 1 az CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Dispatching Decision Flow Chart Narrative The following Dispatching Decision Flow Chart was designed to outline the major processes and decisions that a call-taker/dispatcher would perform in processing an incident or an alarm from Its receipt through the actual dispatch and conclud- ing at the final logging and reporting stage. Basically there are seven ways that an emergency can be reported to the fire department. They are by telephone, radio- either fire department or police, a direct wire alarm, street radio boxes* cen- tral station alarms and hardware Gamewell street boxes. A seventh type of alarm that registers in the Fire Department.Communication Center is a M.A.R.C. Super- visory Equipment Alarm. It supervises the proper operation of various electronic devices. These Flow Charts show basically four separate but inter-relate'd flows of informa- tion. 1. Normal alarm receipt by telephone or radio. 2. Any method of alarm receipt other than by telephone, radio or an equipment alarm. 3. The supervisory equipment alarm. 4. The unit status change. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- 1. Normal alarm receipt. Normally alarms are received in one, of two manners, by telephone from the fire station or the citizen, or by radio from a fire appara- tus or from the County Sheriff's Office. The caller is then interogated as, to the incident type, the address, city, cross street, any additional information' and in the case of a telephone call from a citizen, a call back number and some- times name and address. This information is written down by the .call-taker for later use. During the course of the interogation the call-taker makes a deci- sion based on this District's standard operating procedures as to whether or not this is an incident that needs a fire department response. If it is not, the call-taker takes whatever action,is .deemed necessary such as referral, etc. and then stops the process. If the call is for a valid incident the call-taker must determine whether this call has priority above any other pending calls, if not, he processes the other calls first and then proceeds. The next decision to be made is to determine if this call is for an active alarm already in pro- gress and if it is, the determination must be made whether the initial response was adequate. If the response was adequate, the process then stops. If the alarm was not for an active alarm or if the response was not adequate on the initial alarm, the next determination must be was there an address given. If not, the call-taker must consult District maps and various telephone directories to determine the exact address if possible, or at least a proximity. If an address is given, or is found, the next step is to pull the Street Card from the file, find the address range and cross streets and.,thenthe area code. At; this point a determination must be made as to the type of units (structure or wildland) and the quantity of units (single or full response) that are to respond to this incident, based on the Auxiliary Response Data. Using the area code, the dispatcher then pulls the Response Card from its file and then selects the units that are to respond on this incident. The dispatcher then checks the status of all the units that are to respond by looking at the status board, and/or the Auxiliary Status Files to determine whether the units select- ed are available to respond to this incident. If one or more of' the units are not available, the dispatcher must then select new units to respond, based on the next due unit on the response card or information obtained from the Auxili- ary Response Data or from Plan I. The new units are checked for status and, availability. Then determination must be made as to which units are in the station and which are not. If all units are in station the dispatch will be' made on Channel 30 if no units are in station the dispatch will be made on Channel 7, and if some of the units are in station and some are not, the units on the air will be advised to stand by and the dispatch -will be made over both Channels 3 and 7. Determination is then made whether other agencies,;i.e.'.Police Department, Water etc. need to be notified and/or services requested. If at this point the number of units available in the District falls below a pre-determined level, or is in- dicated on the Response Card, Plan I is then instituted. Field information such as arrival time, condition report, correct address, re- sult of alarm and cause are combined with initial incident data and dispatch information collected by the dispatcher to prepare an incident log. Certain in- formation from the incident log, i.e. incident number, time of receipt, method of notification, area code, etc. are then relayed by the dispatcher to the of- ficer in charge of the dispatched units to assist them -in the preparation of their incident reports. The incident reports are then filed for later intero- gation into the California .Fire Incident Reporting System (CFIRS) . 2. If the alarm receipt is other than.-by telephone or radio, such as street box, direct wire alarm and central station alarm, the display or tape is then read and verified and a box number is determined. The dispatcher must. then deter- mine whether this is a valid incident as indicated by the display. If it is not, the dispatcher then takes whatever action is necessary and then stops the process. If the alarm was for an incident then the determination must be made whether this is for an active alarm already being processed by this system. If it is, the process then stops, if it is not, the dispatcher then.utilizes the box number to pull the Box Card from the file. From the Box Card the dis- patcher then determines whether or not a full response is indicated on the card. If a full response is indicated, he then continues into the normal dispatch path at Point A and then pulls the Response Card. If the Box Card does not indi- cate a full response, then the units to respond are indicated on the card. He' then enters the dispatch flow at Point B and checks the status of the units. 3. If a supervisory equipment alarm is received, the dispatcher reads the display and number, pulls the associated M.A.R.C. card, takes whatever action is indi- cated on the card and then stops the process. 4. At any time the dispatcher may receive a unit status change report via radio, at which time he will manually change the status board to reflect the units new status. CONTRA COSTA COU14TY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DISPATCHING DECISION FLOWCHART • NOVEMBER 1, 1977 � INITIAL INCIDENT DISTRICT TELEPHONE STREET AUXILIARY DATA MAP DIRECTORIES CARDS RESPONSE DATA PROCESS OTHER TELEPHONE CALLS +' (CITIZEN) N N PULL DETERMINE INTEROGATE 1 st y CTIVE y ADEQUATE ADDRESS N FIND STREET UNIT TYPE CALLER INCIDENT? y PRIORITY? ALARM? RESPONSES N GIVEN? ADDRESS CARD AND UANTITY RADIO N y y TAKE STOP DIRECT READ LIGHT NECESSARY PROCESS WIRE AND ACTION ALARMS NUMBER STREET EAD DISPLAY RADIO AND N BOXES VERIFY y PULL FULL INCIDENT? ACTIVE N BOX RESPONSE y ? CARD CARD CENTRAL STATION A ALARMS READ TAPE p GAMEWELL B STREET BOXES EAD DISPLAY EQUIPMENT AND PULL ALARMS NUMBER CARD • r _ r r 0 r. . tr 1: CARDS— OJ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JJ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I DISPATCHING DECISION FLOWCHART NOVEMBER 1, 1977 • RESPONSE AUXILIARY DISTRICT PLAN ONE STATUS AUXILIARY CARDS RESPONSE MAP BOARD STATUS DATA FILES i DISPATCH CHANNEL 3 ALL PULL SELECT CHECK UNITS ONE I o LgNIOSNE A RESPONSE UNITS STATUS AVAILABLE UNITSINCHANNELH7 ANjN t+DILATED N CARD7 F UNITS ? N Y Y SOME DISPATCH REQUEST INSTITUTE CHANNEL NECESSARY PLAN ONE 3 & 7 SERVICES SELECT NEW C UNITS i • EONSE (jAUXILIflARY PLAN ONE ESPONATA [ t 6.: G s i~ . •'ik ,t. t t1 .t t �, 4 a f 5- c- a c l t M1.. .... s. k.- _.:, a. ,_:.'r YV.. ^. '.; v.:'x.,.. r ',:. } .i. ,. ... ..' i,;+:[. .e •�' t �.. Y ''-,d ri. S. } , . f ., k „• -.:. ., ..�' .. ..s. r. r„.. � .., a- .. ,. .. ,. ,.t•. . f� ,.. ..,,.^ ..a.,.r a:.r r u .-q.,,. •,i ,, :, ,,: .._ „. ., ,. .,,.. __. _ i, ,. _ �:', .>:r;: rte. t, v, ..4 ., ,.I�?iYY-a , ;(;.- i ,::, ,- .y'r .;lc s .y: - F i ::li” ,�., •:` [_ tr ,. a o r 4,'�. r ; CONTRA COSTiA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DISPATCHING DECISION FLOWCHART F NOVEMBER 1, 1,977 STATUS BOARD i STATUS CHANGE CHANGE STATUS j REPORT k (radio) BOARD { JJ f i PREPARE INCIDENT INCIDENT REPORT REPORT i FPREPARE FIELD ' INCIDENT INCIDENT INFORMATIO LOG LOG i 7 • INITIAL STREET AUXILIARY { INCIDENT CARDS,. RESPONSE DATA DATA * Not ,prepared by dispatchers :r . .,. - .. ., .. ... ....-. 1 5 r..., .. - sk� MG 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DATA STORAGE SPACE REQUIREMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 1, 1977 REQUIRED (",CORD RECORD RECORD STORAGE ID RECORD NAME LENGTH QUANTITY SPACE Manual "A" Initial •Incident Data 168 8,500 1,428,000 Manual "B" Street Card 147 4,650 638,550 Manual. "C" Response Card 209 162' 33,858 Manual "D" Apparatus Status Board 16 60 960 Manual "E" Incident Log 3,072 850 2,611,200 N f RECORD DESCRIPTION Date December 1, 1977 Record I.D. Record Name Initial Incident Data C Description Porary File of Reference Information Application Record Incident Info as Recieved b Source Y Caller t is Medium Scratch Paper File I.D. Manual "I" File Name Location Data File Description Incident Location Data Record Length 168 ..-_._...., Fixed or Variable variable Record Quantity 8500 Block Size N/A Character Type AIN Justification Field Label Description None Packing None Comments: C 329 RECORD LAYOUT Record I.D. Manua "A" Record Name Initial Incident Data Sequence Field Character Number Name Type Length Comments 1 Incident Type A ' 15 Structure, Vehicle, etc. 2 Address a) Street Number N 5 b) Street Name AIN 22 3 ' Location I.D. AIN 20 Business Name, Apt. , etc. q Cityl A 13 5 Cross Street AIN 22 6 Caller ID a) Phone Number AIN 8 b) Name A 15 c) Address AIN 28 7 Additional Info. AIN 20 Total Record Length 168 0030 :aa } ! "(fir•: RECORD DESCRIPTION Date December 1, 1977 Record I.D. Manual "B" Record Name Street Card C Description Location Characteristics filed by Address APPlication Cross Reference from Initial Incident Data to Response Card Source Field Su ervisors Medium Paper Cards File I.D. _ Manual "I" File Name Location Data File Description Incident Location Data Record Length 147 Fixed or Variable Variable Record Quantity 4 650 Block Size N/A Character Type A/N Justification Field C. Label Description None Packing None Comments: . t y RECORD LAYOUT Record I.D. Manual "B" Record Name Street Card Sequence Field Character Number Name Type Length Comments 1 Address a) Street Number N 5 b) Street Name AIN .22 c) Location I.D. AIN 20 Business Name, Apt. , etc. 2 City A 13 3 Cross Streets A 22 4 Old Address Number N 5 5 District Code N 2 First-in Station 6 Area Code AIN 3 Station Area Sub-group 7 Map Page AIN 3 Calif. Grid System 8 Grid Location AIN 5 9 Police Jurisdiction A 4 10 Water District A 5 11 Special Instructions AIN 30 Pink Card (Closed Street, etc. 12 Date Updated N 8 mm/dd/yy Total Record Length 147 C . �{Yt�S .,4 U wJav,¢ { � � ' i-. � ?S f aw i) '`Y •:. 5 ,, fi _ ,. .1 Ff , {lp RECORD DESCRIPTION Date December 1, 1977 Record I.D. Manual "C" Record Name Response Card Description Apparatus Assignments by Area and type of Fire Application Document Standard Responses for Dispatchers Source Field Supervisors Medium Paper Cards File I.D. _Marual "II" File Name Response Data File Description Data Needed to Affect a Correct Response to an Incident Record Length 209 Fixe: or Variable Variable Record Quantity 162 Block Size N/A Character Type _ A/N Justification Field Packing None CLabel Description None Comments: h a. t.,'- 1 i> � '' ip�° �� � � d ♦ .,� � .p,r '' fr .�i r tt{,t y'2�7 4' X('N'ti" RECORD LAYOUT Record I.D. —Manlla1 Record Name Response Card Sequence Field Character Number Name Type T e Length Comments 1 Area Code 'A/N 3 Station Area Sub-roup ;• 2 Incident TypeA 3 Suggested Response .15 15 Structure, Vehicle, etc. a) 1st Alarm 24 1) Engines AIN 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN 4) Staff AIN 5) Chief AIN • t b) ' 2nd Alarm 45 1) Engines AIN 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN 4) Staff AIN '•5) Chief AIN c) 3rd Alarm g r 1) Engine AIN 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN 4) Staff AIN 5) Chief AIN d) 4th Alarm 10 1) Engine AIN. 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN 4) Staff AIN 5) Chief AIN 4 Rescue (truck) AIN 4 5 Move Up a) 1st Alarm 1) Engines AIN 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN - 4) Staff AIN 5) Chief AIN `. b) 2nd Alarm 13 1) Engines AIN 2) Truck AIN 3) Misc. AIN - 4) Staff AIN (� 5) Chief A/N Sequence Field Character Number Name Type Length Comments C) 3rd Alarm 25 • 1) Engines A/N 2) Truck A/N 3) Misc. A/N 4) Staff A/N 5) Chief A/N 6 Special Instructions A/N 30 Pink Card {Closed Street, e" 7 Updated N 8 mm/dd'/" Total Record Length 209 Q _ k RECORD DESCRIPTION Date December 1, 1977 Record I.D. Manual "D" Record Name _Apvaratus Status Board Description Temporary file of unit current status (availability) Application Used to determine availability of response equipment Source Radio notification by field units Medium Visual Display (color lights) File I.D. Manual "II" File Name Response Data File Description Data needed to affect a correct response to an incident Record Length 16 characters Fixed or Variable fixed Record Quantity 60 records Block Size N/A Character Type AIN Justification Field Packing None Label Description None Comments: C A 0(1336 tvo 1�� ` r 19 .5 k ♦�{f t a>� .,tt� „dl � �,�' 4 4''� 1g�tl i;x L ka•r.7� F�` � � 3 R.�sk y [.r,fy % Y p _ � i a' i S '"1 ��° 1 f < Y`pP '�•t'r'.� �1 s. _ t P . �.eF�r'�. � Xr.}h'tS a . t c.J�� �1 RECORD LAYOUT Record I.D. Manual "D" Record Name_ Apparatus Status Board Sequence Field Character Number Name Type Length Comments 1 Unit Designator A/N 2 Station Number N 3 3 Status Indicator N 6 Color Lights • ,off; ( 1 1 RECORD DESCRIPTION Date December 1 1977 Record I.D. -ZaUIUl "E" Record Name Incident Lo C Description pprmanent Record of Incident Information Application Usedocument dispatch activity and results Source DIAna rhprs and field reports Medium paper form File I.D. `Manual "III" File Name Dispatching Reports File Description Documents created by dispatching activities Record Length 3,072. characters , Fixed or Variable fixed Record Quantity 850 records Block Size H/A Character Type _ A/N Justification Field Packing None Label Description None Comments: C C� 00338 ^��S z{ 1 ' a iii k•` s � L y�.r 4 ti � y' r 5 7�� snA {1 F . .r F r�'}' t - r •ir vi���. i r4 7� � r e (, ri �'t �' � k�tX7tt t �pq'ts�'�'� .i > i� RECORD LAYOUT Record I.D. Manual "E" Record Name Incident Log Sequence field Character Number Name Type Length Comments 1 Heading a) Tape Number N 3 b) Date N .8 =a/dd/yy - c) Shift Number A 1 2 Incident Detail (Occurs 10 times) a) Incident Number N S b) Time of Receipt N 4 c) Source Code N 2 d) Alarms Code N 2 e) Area Code AIN 4 f) Type of Incident A 15 g) Location AIN 47 h) City A '13 i) Alarm Source AIN 51 J) Apparatus AIN 60 k) 10-97 Time N 4 1) Condition Report A 20 m) Control Time N 4 n) Result (R-3) N 2 o) Cause (D8) N 2 p) Damage/Size AIN 7 q) Death Injury AIN 4 r) Press Info. AIN 20 s) Inspector AIN 10 t) Remarks AIN 30 Nine other Incident Details 2,754 Total Record Length 31072 +■■/y.■. i f a cz Ty �lf,y,• �tla.•. a"W f���'il+s,{" tf„f sJ �,�)��� '�'> z. t f • SECTION A - 2 SAMPLE INCIDENT i 4f r.' t� Input _ Fire Call Telephone Dispatcher: Fire Department Emergency! Caller: Yes, I'd like to report a building on fire at 2945 TreatBoulevard, Concord, I' think it's the Fire Department` Training.Center. Dispatcher: What's the nearest cross street? Caller: Oak Grove Road. Dispatcher: And your name and phone number please. Caller: Mrs. Mary Doe, 939-3400, I think I saw someone running away from the tire. Dispatcher: Thank you, we have units responding now. • Fire - structure 2945 Treat Boulevard, Concord X-street Oak Grove Fire Department Training Center Mrs. Doe 939-3400 Someone running away Scratch pad • ,i Block Intersection First in Area District Code �) 3RE2K CARD 26co kirRITO'NDR 10 101 --Ll 2 _ 2300 P,:s U11TY L?1 2850 ROYAL Ali—LI, LId .'w"' '2 FIRE STATIO-N 10 J 00'0 0 ROUE RD t 3055 SL •TER.400D PL T 310- -R AVE. 10H ia5 1123 50 4 ORI W 3200 .-WILIIPPE AVE i IOB 00 SAN S It•rON DR 0 CITRUS AVE _34, 0 SAN MIGI.EL RD 3485-3571 (Long Driveway To Nort 3500 TIAVAROTTE '.-JAY 10/22/76 'VILDL�UTr, ^,L��0?TSE /Oi{ CCCPD ( ?dD ` Street {, r Community , MNT BLVD 2500-35 '0 CO�IC'JP.D STrZ carro� n i .r i. .. .i- li :in ?4. :;..... �. l'�' e ,SY _� i _ - t I��• I`f. -r5 1-._ ., b,,., •« .w RADIO BOAC 069 (Si t I AASTME ) FOR MESSAGE 0 - BOX PULLED FROM THE STREET INITIAL RESPONSE: M0 FULL RESPONSE: E10 E2 T6 Br 2 AREA CODE: 1OF +. STREET BOX LOCATED IN THE TRAINING CENTER PARKING LOT FORMESSAGE IAL AUXILL4RY TRIP INITIAL REt3POr E: FULL ASSIGNMENT IIJ FULL ASS IGM1,01T: E10 E2 T BC2 AREA CODE: lOFI AUTOMATIC ALARM SYSTal CONNECTED TO TRAINING CENTER, 2945 TREAT BLVD. TEL# 685-8511 OR LOCAL 60 ' FOR MESSAGE 9 - nLEGAL ENTRY INITIAL RESPONSE; DURING NOaIAL HOURS CALL TRAINING CENTER AT NIGHT & WEEKENDS ROLL E10 & CONCORD PD ' ILLEGAL ENTRY ALARM LOCATED IN TRAINING CENTER, 29h5 TREAT BLVD. TEL# 685-8511 OR LOCAL 60 NOTE: IN ALL CASES TRAINING PERSONNEL 14UST RESET. SEE BACK OF CARD FOR PERSONNEL WHO HAVE KEYS, 2945 TREAT BLVD., CNC (TRAINING CENTER -RADIO BOX7 069' 1 ti V _ it • f3;o ,r a C e r 40344, I 6 ytM7K •' i ,� sf nay^ r �• 1 K. r �{.�`Yif •Yc`�ik�� �?ii'�.f7�ii:ny§,*Tz ...•„ _a.� - t S,,�,u..,K.1 r,.,. . c 1/: .a. 'C?'�`S..,Fd 4 ir',.�"1 c'_' n, AREA CODE 10F ALARM E N G I N E S TRUCK SC FSTAFFSC CHIEF 10 2 6. BC2 1 z 8 61 � CAS17 C0DE CF BC1 AC 3 1 5 14 AC 4 4 17 CHIEF M 0 V E U p RESCUE: E10 T6 Z -6 T14-5 3 4--1 8..65 ,. PLAN 1 4 DAN-1 16-2 AREA CODE 10F STRUCTURE 7/1/�4 1 PIN U[�35 SAMPLE A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 2010 GEARY ROAD PLEASANT HILL,CALIFORNIA INCIDENT REPORT OCCUPANT NAME RELATIONSHIP YEAR J INCIDENT NO. Training Center - C.C.C.C.F.C. Owner 1 0 16 5. 12 1 ADDRESS OF INCIDENT CITY TELEPHONE-HOME 2945 Treat Boulevard Concord 939-3400 OWNER NAME I ADDRESS CITY TELEPHONE-WORK C.C.C.C. Fire District 2010 Geary Road Pleasant Hill 939-3400 A. INFORMATION (PAGE 11) FIRE DEPT.I.D. XP.NO TIME MONTH I DAY I YEAR I DOYJ CITY I STA.NO I ALARM I ALARMS AREA CODE a+' Ye 0 14 1 10 1 1 .0 0 Q� irl":� 10171019" 101 1 1* 1 ,_.'.�--' 1 1 0. 0 14 7 17 Ir B. INCIDENT,CONDITION.RESULT &CONTROL (PAGE 13) CODE TYPE OF INCIDENT CO PIR'DATE CODE CONDITION ON ARRIVAL X 1 11 11 structure fire 10 2 0871 2 11 3 1 Confined to room of origin CODE RESULT OF ALARM CODE NOW FIRE CONTROLLED 3 1 Confined to 2 rooms 4 11 1 1 lis" lines C. PROPERTY CLASS &TYPE (PAGE 18) 1 CODE PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION(INDIVIDUAL) 21 CODE PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION(COMPLEX) 21 3 1 3 F. D. Training Center"1 5 1 9 1 Government complex 3 mg Typ. e Ext.Wag 51 Flo ROor/ Fire yr a 2 2 Int. V R D. ORIGIN,IGNITION &CAUSE (PAGE 37) CODE LEVEL OF ORIGIN 21,CODE AREA OF ORIGIN 1 11 01 11 Ground floor P IClassroom CODE TYPE OF MATERIAL FIRST IGNITED CODE FORM OF MATERIAL FIRST IGNITED 3 2 1 3 1 Gasoline 418 JAccelerant CODE SOURCE OF HEAT CAUSING IGNITION 61 CODE FORM OF HEAT CAUSING IGNITION 91 81 No equipment involved 6 6 I -Molotov cocktail CODE ACT OR OMMISSION CAUSING IGNITION CODE CAUSE OF FIRE 8 11 51 Incendiary act - adult 6 Set fire - responsible identified E. SPREAD (PAGE61) CODE MAIN AVENUE OF FIRE SPREAD 2 CODE TYPE OF MATERIAL CAUSING FIRE SPREAD CODE FORM OF MATERIAL CAUSING FIRE SPREAD CODE ACT OR OMMISSION CAUSING FIRE SPREAD 3 4 CODE MAIN AVENUE OF SMOKE SPREAD F. PROTECTION FACILITIES (PAGE 74) Sprinklers Standpipes Port.Exting. Priv.Brigade Spec.Protect. Signal/Warning System Watchrm' Separations Type Effect Type Effect Type Effect TYPO Effect Type Effect Typo Effect Activ. Detec. Effect Type Effect Caus*of failure 5 3 2 1 1 - � 1 1 1 1 —e--T f k I I m n 0 P q r b G. RESPONSE & HOSE STREAMS (PAGE 81 STATION APPARATUS STATION HOSE STREAMS---- AT SCENE Engs. Trks ascad Porsonnei None W1 ith,. 2Y&" Master Hyd Foam Chief FVS ther or M F.D. 10 T:1'kr M 0% 2 1 9 2 2 LT 3 1 1 El E f 1 9 E a c I d e a I b c d e a H. LOSS PROPERTY &PERSONS (PAGE 82) Firefighter Civilians CODE LOSS PROPERTY CODE LOSS CONTENTS r injured deat s injured deaths 1 2 01 4 1 $7,500 10 13 1 $2,500 SFM FORM GO.1 SUBMITTED FOR EACH DEATH 3 (CHECK BOX IF YES) x � '00345 1. VEHICLE (PAGE83) OF VEHICLE CODE MAKEEMODEL M LICETEL/POWER NSE NO. STA TI-U I . - I . . I J. APPLIANCE (PAGE 87) CODE TYPE OF APPLIANCE CODE MAKE*MFR, MODEL NO. SF I -R IAL NO. Y!!] K. RESCUE (PAGE 80) CODE TYPE RESCUE 21 CODE RESCUE',-VCATION CODE AID PROVIDED PRIOR TO ARRIVAL BY 1 CODE NUMBER OF VICTIMS 51 COO-E No.F.D.PERSONNEL IN AMBULANCE 6 CODE NO.PARAMEDICS AT SCENE, 7 CODE REASON NO SERVICE GIVEN L. VICTIM DATA (PAGE 91) ENGINE COMPANY MEMBERS a b c d e. f g h I j k I m n o p q r J > In cc w n W 2 z 0 z 0 ir a 0 0 R 0 0 MEMBER IN AMBULANCE > a 0 0 0( z 4ft U it z W2 6a. > D w 0 U. 0 w V) i-1 W > 0 0 w W 0 W j U. 2 0J 0 0 U z 0 U 2— 4 0 w ti 0 W W 0 w w w ch IL W IL 0 75 cL I I 4 14L x cr VICTIM NAME AGE VICTIM NAME AGE 2 3 VICTIM NAME AGE [4 VICTIM NAME AGE M. REMARKS (PAGE97) See Summary. PREPAItt„Gj BY SHIFT BATT. DATE APPROVED BY SHIFT BATT. DATE ............. ----------------------------- .................. .................. ........... ............... .................. • • ' TAPE NUMBER: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT INCIDENT LOG SHIFT DATE: INCIDENT TIME OF SOURCE ALARMS AREA TYPE OF INCIDENT LOCATION CITY ALARM SOURCE APPARATUS 10-47 CONDITION CONTROL NUMBER RECEIPT CODE CODE CODE TIME REPORT TIME 0 4JN\�Qvw� Arc "J0 .S Q\ M NU a M42. Sir �$1 S Z,'3S6 wo V&* .J;�tk dad { r� C r OtA��A 1r70V1M(� G O V i .' ^ W 4 10.T3. ��, w Akk iJ t V ICS of+ Ctw»t Cush Olio � 00 is E Mel, Www, 1061 Vcm- 11k4'4 Luf, 183.3671 E-iz011M t3�� �'o��avt�vi� ltau &V8 0347 � t to .64 ���������. 7 `1�3��� 3�o �3, 1, 1�1, �, ��# 035'3 �,v, , CO5 7 2, 1 0 o t I A 1 � ;,,�, . ►, G85�- t q 8 �--i �! Aj�, tvc. 2.7a O -�� i �-�+• jtl Ca ry`3#.�•2 9 fJ - "? Sp+'ru 47�`c�r.e ?r��N�tiq Ceha.r wor.�,•e 9 FE- ? G ac— 07'1& j-r ns 0 71/6' l 10 10F read filed ?"D G e Per F•042 (10.75) .,� h G�o�eh7` ,�- D V' 348 NOTEt For al( Incidents, get the 134 code from the person writing the original report. For rims only, get the DS code from the person writing the original report. RESULT CAUSE DAMAGE/ DEATH/ PRESS INSPECTOR REMARKS g3j D15 SIZE INJURY INFO t f • 1 M -Soo - Z� Woo I qP/0/000 Fra Owl C S 1?e /-7L 003' SECTION A - 3 SELECTED FORM SAMPLES Street Card, Response Card, Box Alarm Card „i 1. �x i • �. ` Ni CO!JTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 10/76 I1TF0RV_4TION SHEET i64-06 TOPIC: Street Card Format IITTRODUCTION: Street card information which has been submitted on form F-465 is used to type the final card. The following are examples of completed street cards. INFORMATION: A. The Basic Card 1. Contains: a. Lowest number b. Highest number c. All cross-streets d. First in district e. Area code f. P•iap coordinates g. (deleted) h. Date cord typed i. Police jurisdiction J. Water company k. Street Flame 1. Inclusive numbers M. City or Postal Zone n. Stations receiving copies of card 2. Example: Block Intersection First In Area I 1, Grid DPstrict Code ' Loc. — 522 -STERLTIM DR 600 ALPINR QT 631 SKYLJITE pg 639 Mfl) 12/26/74 r� 00` 51 StreetCom ni mu t WEBSTM DR _ Y2 500 639 iARTINEZ 13 e ♦ ! � rc (. X11 l� i 2 1 r r •y �- _ T-" B. Example of a street having a number series change 1. Example: Block Intersection First in Area Grid District Code Loc. ERD 00 PALISADE DR 0 C 9 CURVE 615- E10) WE 12/26/74 MPD MWD J Street Community .G�I�a,�Y` DR 300-898 2-U1,RTIlYE2 12 C. Example of a street where the Highest and Lowest numbers are not at the beginning and end of street. Block Intersection First in Area Grid District Code . Loc. TR r 2126 (L99 MIBER) 2136 END 12/26/7k 11PD MWD Street Cot �nity a. TRINITY GT, 2126,- U., ,9. D. Example of a street where area code changes and/or target hazards exist. Block intersection First in Area District Grid Coda Lae, 1 CONTRA COSTA BLVD D 20 NORTH 1,11111 MAIN ST 200 CLEAVELAJT AVE 232 RICHIE DR CAIRFPBELL LN PH INT SCHOOL EDDIABLC VISTA SCHOOL D 1 PATTERSON BLVD 3 LJA.HOVA CT 7 Pt'3SHARD ST HCRTEPT CT 00 KAHRS AVE SOU 2 MA M , 0 12/26/74 PHPD CCWD Street gOY,D RD 15-500 Community E. Example of a street where the road does not go through. block intersection First in Area Dishiet -•-•-• Grid ....... Code LOC.' dF 0A BRA2 ELLIOT D HILL CT PLEASA2'T HRD Ei D 0 G 2 C 2 � 8I DR 12/26/74 PHPD street BOXD R ,r3z 500—$0 i7� i ,_.... .. .a ,., . ..,�..x"t �}=1.;_, W{R,F,".a.t� c y.,.la.•5�t>�.s'ie�n.,"1G{"+ i rk . rti)b L .t���A h 'q � >i '.i 'y.„ .,�;�•xt�3t.x�;;�-iM 1�trr,�:. :�,;��.� ,*;"'xv� '?y.*;s,''�•r4§� �`{.�:i�``r;t1,r= ea �""S�,.r F. Example of a cross-reference card. Block Intersection First in Area Grid District Code Loc. SEE THE AUZMA: Street AWEDA,p THE Community C ONC ORD 6 G. Example of a street card with special instructions. First in Area + Grid Block IntersectionnDistrict Cods Loc. JAMA • _ Ell 26 NOTE: 140 —243 RMSTER ST TATMART ST L)ISPATCH S14 j ALL PIM LUPO OIZOL, 54 12/26/74 MPD/S O• .. .. MWD onNnynier # str..e CpR,GU3�� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY C011SOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT �b 16�1-07 TAIFORI �� "Inr: SHEET �. TOPIC: Wildland Street Card Format IIITR011UCTIOIT: In addition to regular street card inforr»ation, certain street cards are marked for "Wildland Response:" This narking is in the form of a green line in the "First-in-District" column opposite the cross-streets of the "Wildland" area. The "Wildland" response code is also indicated on the card. 114FORMATION: A. Eaaxxple: Block Intersection First in Area Grid District Code Loc. 20 ARTAUR RD 12 12B- 1 0 VALLEY' DR 7o IR.ENE DR ' E1iD 12/26/74 t so VIULAND RESPONSE AREA 12 W CCWD streetCENTRAL AVE 520-868 Community MRTIN;` ��3J� CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 5/77 AREA CODE CARD ABBREVIATIONS APPARATUS IDENTIFICATION E - ENGINE CO. T - TRUCK CO. PW - POWER WAGON (CLASS I WILDLAND) TA - TANKER (CLASS II WILDLA11D) WS - WATER SUPPLY (CLASS III WILDLAND) TF - TASK FORCE (SUIOER YOUTH PROGRAM) AIR - AIRCRAFT CAS - CASCADE SERVICE UNIT COMM - COMM[1NICATIONS VAN STAFF IDENTIFICATION AG - ASSISTANT IEF BC - BATTALION CHIEF CHF - CHIEF INSP - INSPECTOR MUTUAL AID AGENCY IDENTIFICATION ORN - ORINDA FIRE DAN - DANVILLE FIRE PIN - PINOLE FIRE MOR - MORAGA FIRE RTP - RIVERVIEJ FIRE -i MC - MARSH CREEK FIRE CDF - CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY EBRP - EAST BAY REG PARK DISTRICT EBMUD - EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT RESERVES RES-12 STATION 3.2 RESERVES COVER STATION 12 18RES - STATION 18 RESERVES - RECALL OR USE TO MAN SPECIFIED APPARATUS MISCELLANEOUS. 112ND ALRM" - DEPRESS BUTTON LABELED 112ND AIJWt. THIS TRANSMITS TONES WHICH WILL ACTIVATE ALL CHIEF OFFICER AND CERTAIN STAFF PAGERS. PLAN 1 - ACTIVATE PLAN 1. }M JS' ya;, ;. _y. f t .. /I y- x friL-H - � F'`i� Y r 1� 4} ~(' Il7'y`81i^Y ytt.} 1.7"�,lfy c f •1 �t ' i i. 2!,tc` t✓pr:} _ 5 .t ���4S�.uk� F i�; a { ;4� r•., � K , r� sd:, s' 's 1,fffi .c y r 4 1: , AREA CODS. 2A ALARM E N G I N E S TRUCK I4ISC STAFF CHIEF 1 2 5 15 BCI 2 1 13 CAS17 2NS sc2 16 lA AC a M O V E U P -- RESCUE: E2 Tl' .. ` 2 6-5 3 17-15 4-1 a AREA CODE 2A STRUCTURE 6/1/77. AREA CODE .?B_...__ ALARM ENGINES TRUCK RISC of rAFE CHIEF IA 2 5 ' . 4 - cash WRESS 2ND AW BC2 3 10 13 AC': }� i MOVE U P RESCUE: E2 Tl 2 6-5 ' 16-1 8-10 . ` 3 18-6 • a �r AREA CODE 2B STRUCTURE;. 6/1/77_ . -0.005'7 r ALARM E N G I N E S TRUCK 11ISC STiU—v .. CHIEF 11 8 6 BC2 2 10 6ACAS17 DEPRES BCl 2rTD ALt 3 1 2 AC 4 MOVE UP RESCUES Ell E8 (T6) 1-10 2 1-8 9-6 2-10 12-2 3 (2h-8l) IS-8) 17-2 o4 AREA CODE ]•Lk STRUCTURE 6/1/77 o � ALARM E N G I N E S TRUCK 141SC STAFF CHIEF 1l 8 6 BC2 2 10 6, 1 CAS17 DEPRES BC1 AC 3 l 2 14 AC ' 4 9 4 M O V E U P RESCUE: Ell E8 (T6) 10-8 �-10 2 1-8 9-6 1SRES E4-1 1.4RES- 2--10 12-9 13.6 T14-2 S14 3 13rtt S- 4-10 47-2PLAN 1 4 2- 16-10 i 12A-9 DAN-1 AREA CODE 11B STRUCTURE 67U77 ARE-;A C nDE .1 C ' ALARM ENGINES TRUCK j,jnC STP.FF CHIEF 1 14. 12 13 14 —' Bc2 2 1l�RHS 12RM. 13Rrs 6 H04%,E P.R 3 9 2 CODE CF BCI AC 1 AC 4 ROD 5 CAIEr . M o V E' u P RESCUE; B14 T34 Ell 1 2 9-12 2-13 TI-5 3 8-9 7-2 4 18RES 7-13 PLAN 1 18:.6 AREA CODE 14C STRUCTUrM 8/1/76 AREA CO U ALARM ENGINES tTRUCK M.LBG STAFF CHIEF 1 14 13 12 BC2 2 1tt 13REs 12PM HOidE RR CODE GF BC1 AC 3 9 2 1 AC 4 5 ROD CHIEF M 0'V E U P RESCUE:.. El4 T14 E13 2 9-12 2-13 Tl-5 3 8_9 17-2 . OD-1 Z 7-3 18F.FS 4 its-6., AREA COOS 14D 'STRUCTURES 8/1/76 i 2 .f.': 1 ,+1 ifs� 3 3 l `L�1�y� � 4 .,f k mil -S` r i , •N NORM GATZ/CAS=.ROCFf MTCE{r150,3 FAQ' '.WnMAlM REACT t:E AREA APPARATUS & MOVEUPS SUPPORT CHIEF CrMER/CO?�i11�iTS y 1 ., MTRESS 112tip.,AI.HM►: -'� -.�,t.J s_ �„__ �L.i+l+i�..�,lV+ -.:f '�;'�. J�s ft '� ►+i7 r.� _ ..'1 �� ,j7�.�.�A,:�.�� TC!",.r' .rF •+"'�,-,..fiL _,,,"`� ;r y�TA12 WfRES fSF�F NOfiE -��- r ,, `Q MOTEI�"«NOT RESP' 'F12 qSK,'TNCMENT'CMDFU-, —'4..}w. (' lql•�x�-.l^-•af,.-�..Y� M�; � {j M]AF•I^N..Y' �� '�Y�' � ~ �. �'. �" �•�n.i.it'Wl tura"'�-t' "�� i: �"" �`=.-"4+ ,!'c'L -'`r k �1��{ a...ry.�.,_ - �.+". 1 .r ,�»I,TM•�iiZ'^' _ ,-1-. -:.`_rte." IiY^t-...•.iv�f`.y}+:'..;�7 2 u=�, APPARATtI�'r $ IaIJVEUPSSUPPORT = GREF �:CYI HERJCOI�3�IEN i5 �Yt�.17C7+w 1`�*7x�F�j�...,r�i '�•'� _Y�� ,�` y/�� �.{� `.`'r NC�.� -•�T �.n I' ��"'� Wit'^``mit � •,:v' . !Arm t1 . y3r'!w"+• '7 `c., n�': `., Com' " * -ti.... �..�z..- rte.=�'5+���` X =:��,�yy���7►' r"�'-^..Y '4'y.' ^'"c �"al �+�1( - - :•.�. r-(�y,!Y;rte .-_',:r'-t t'?t.r�" Cl-•�.y.."„"",'�� -'.+.; [r ,,.'�;'•+k�'?�'a=�� BCI-. >t --DEPRESS--1►2N.D_AUX tHil ..'" r _ ;,� "�S�p�+,�r• ♦ r r r finwy �/ .�, -fes., �ppyll���-�----��� �, '�C-��'�`S.'"'� e �. "�"e�,�' i.--'� ,�7� {� i``w^'RT�yf^"i>('•�w-.. TA12 W/R (SEE NOTE)'. _ CDF :_: L AC NOTE: IF_NOT,RESP y `M5 . ;;MOVE sa b 15 - _ TFL2. E13A W/RES r ASK INCIDENT CHDR IF. AIR I 'AC3:TtrATF "PT-AN l—" PW12 �.► Y J5 K Y t � -I ' o ... .. 1`^'^:�•�`�lir�.��43'RSS�T•.�rii�4�'r�'.�f'�t� ����'1��.��+I ;,�� � A APPARATUS F, b`OVEUPS SUPPORT G-'TEF OTHER/CO?fMENT'SPW1 ^ E9 2 BC2 - _ ,.PW 4 �S]-rl Wr - .. uJrl'; '-+J`'YW TlS1.7x .f'a-... �-j{ / mar_ r _ ..at1 .� •., . r:TA12 W/RFS (SEE:NOTE) . TF14 �FFFb � jrpy 3-]1� NOTE:-IF:.TIOT-11FSP t -� Tnzr ECA7.Z:.S1 � .. EPRES3: YRn2,,{R ALRrP�, l - _ .. 3- do S1Jt..,RESERVES - • _ -•_"r•^h i.:r;-a ^3•� �, �{r�-t-,,t �' y.� y_^ :' - ,;4� -� �ElltA - CD AC _' . _ ASK:_T.ICIDET�fi: CMDR':; L3A W/RFS :MOVE�E2=13 , TAS ;,�r.,�MOVE E7 8-6 1 1 u r g WANTS`AIR T 1 � ACTIVATE PLU I _ 1 _ -rr..v= ��� -`r r"S.N� 1 �iIJ"�a-+. :�• yi � � �.�„r�- �•ru AREA CO A 7A t - A f Pm -APPARATUS= �� DL�ND`RESPG�ISE'`1�R - -- =" F, MUVEUPS SUPPORT CHIEF 071-1ER/COtAKEIVT$ . .. �+, L`O K tom... ,- r �� Bl.r {�� .- . '�..;,�..-.•5 �y?l' 113n 'w/.S ..µ/+��r�—•t.,;� - '„ r.`_.T �f-. { ,ti��.T-[a--ice, yl.��.�•�:.�? t •- 7..��,rcY '�h sti - - �` .�xy.r ---,. .gcl TFIO� , PrOT_E I rjor_RESP - _ DEP[7,S& i,2ND ALRM; rRECAL s13 _i S14 RES �ls _ CD Va AC ,: ASh IP1CIDEiiT CMDR:- MOVE E18-6 _-6- -IT HE WA11TS,A][R ACTIVATE pI.AP1 1 -4 - ------------------------------ t 't `r• - _� AREA CODE- 12, T _ _ vin! 237-3231 BU811 ESS 526-7300 MILD- WATER REQ ENGINE CO - STA,COVER ENG/TRK" LAND SUPPLY- E16 E16 E16 T14 Pwl9, wS19 2 Els 17-1 E15 E17-1 E15 �. FW16 WS2 3 E13 E13 FZ3a', _ - '�. . S'TAT ON LOCATION, - SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS _ 21 Arlington Way ` lt- Kensington, and El Cerrito have' --Channel 4,aria. 5 .radios iri their chief a _ f 2. Notify-HCl of allre9ponses. 99,k �,�KENSINGTON. FIRE 14UTUAL AID.-LOCf+.L...... FIRE: 682.-9733 BUSINEaS c^682-3000....__ jLD-_ REq-:• ENGPTE C4 --STA COVER ENG�TRK;:� • WATER t , Ell Ell Ell .Tb:'a` PFTll W52 z E8 4 " E6-11. E8 E6-11 E8 Tl PW6 TAI 3 E6, B2=-8',; E6 E2_8 TAl: : 4 STATION .LOCATION . .-SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS 120 ,0 MARSH C=E.K RD ' . 1. Have responding un ts. switch to channel 4. and contact Marsh Creek Fire. - .2. Notify HC2 of response. 0362, 99E MARSH CREEK FIRE. J R�DI� :.� ,:• � (.. ./I.:�ST;R) - ::rliAL :iUif.�ER: ObO58 FOR I ESSA ,^ 0 BOX PULLED FPO:•I THE STila:T LIITIAL R?:SPv??S , - FULL �?�•`32:,'Ilii"IT USE AREA CODE 6D LOCATIO:J: OF 3ACO'll AND EAST ST., CO:•1COED ;�•i�' '0 F OR TTSAGE I iGIO M(Y—eIt•1 TAi4Pi;R INITIAL PI:SPO;!SE - ONE TlIT CODE 2 TO CI{?.CY, OUT. ' LOr, m.IOd: rOi •?� UiBACON A'N'D BAST CP., .^, aCORD .; I 'E-. 30Y, 'r1ILL °': OPE.IED BY f'OSPITAL STS+r AFTER IZ'J!"JI113 A TETT. DO I?OT RE^PC%,D IN TciIS CASE. j LI` FOR M-ES SAGE 1L 1.7 DIABLO HOSPITAL AUXILIARY TRIP I I1dITIAL RE P(YISE: FULL ASSIC21j,7ENT USE AREA CODE 6D LOCATIO?I: AUTOI,IATIC FIRE DETECTION Iii THE NORTH WEST jo'LdG OF :SIT DIABLO HOSPITAL, 2540 E,iST ST., CONCORD "7R Mr,',SSAGE YlT DL4BLO HOSPITAL AUXILL•1IZY TRIP DN I T IAL RESPO?ISE: 'FULL ASSIGi•71•TENT USE AREA CODE 6D LOCr,T ON: AUTOi,L4T IC FIML, M.- ECT ION IN EITHER THE BASEI•nIT OR FIRST FLOOR OF THE SOUTH WDIDi 'AT 14T DIABLO HOSPITAL, 25110 EAST ST., CONCORD. OR I-TSS&, GE 6 `- 1iT DIA_LO HOS I.�At i,F.ILIARY TRI7 li t`1!' �''n r1 r I`JITM RESPONSE: FULL ASSIaN?27NT USE A',M CODE 6D LOCA^.IOiI: AUTJI-fATIC FIP_. DETECTIM Iii EITMEER Tip OEC(Y D OR THIRD FLOOR OF Ti-E SOUTH L ITI G AT I-IT DIABLO HOST ITAL F 2540 EAST ST., CONCORD 7 FOR I•Tw�SA GE - MT DIABLO 1103PITAL AUXILIARY TRIP � INITIAL RESP�JSE: A ULJ ASSIGI1M T USE AREA CODE 6D LOCATION: AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION II EITHER THE FOURTH OR ; FIFTH FLOOR OF THE SOUTH WMG AT MT DIABLO HOSPITAL 2540 EAST ST., CONCORD FOR ?:;E"S4'ir 81- t•1 DIABLO HOSPITAL AL7CILL4RY TRIP INITIAL RESPONSE: FULL ASSI nR-IEliT USE AlZTsA CODE 6D n- LO0,ATIO',J: ATJTOI�LITIC FIRE DELECTION IN EITHEM THE SI'XTiI FLOOR Oil TITE PE?:TFIOIjSE OF THE SOUTH ;•,TING AT 1.21 DIABLO ,•, I!OSPITAL, 2540 EAST ST., CC�••iCG? SAY ALARM # 361 (Central Station) INITIAL RESPONSE: FULL FIRST ALARM: El EJA E2 T1 BC1 1A-/U E4-1_ , y SMOKE •DEJECTOR Sr, TEM LCCATTED l,3 THE ComPUFER ROOM_ ■ OF •T. ,IC IS n.UG aSTQR. AMI III T TRATPfr. 077TQ S_ I 141. NORTH CIVIC DR., WAINUT CR�,,"XTEL # 937•-1174 f ; MAP COOp.D: m4 50/16 AREA CODE 1F fi SPECIFIC DIFORMATIO;i: - 3 System consists of two smoke detectors and one manual pull station located in computer room which is located on the first floor,# West end of building. Room can be observed # , by looking through the far North West window of the f` building. a Bay alarm will notify owners and should also respond. l/2/76 ` WCPD r 141 NORTH CIVIC DR., WC (LONG+S) BAY ALARM 381 4vl a f� " e �dd'Ls'�..,y.-: . p �.S•i � r��l .,6 j < ' ` { V�•. � r 1 't '� K �i, ��.' a ; :r' �;i t i e,i t o r i n a aft 7 gyp, • Yti t t. l M - f t . c 13UttN5 ALARM 4 1 (CE11TRAL STATICN) INITIAL RESPONSE: FULL ASSIGNMENT — USE AREA CODE 10—IF' LOCATIQI: AUTOMATIC FIRE ALARM SYSTEM LOCATED AT ABLE VAN & STORAGE 1129 LANDINI LN CROSS ST } REST MONUMENT BLVD CONCORD � MAP COORD: J14 56/34 AREA CODE: 10I TEL # -.'682-2579 2/28/7? CPD j CQWD •, .1129' LANDmi LN., CNCABLE VAN t ) BURNS ALARM 451 r ~,t 1 i r •• C ���a� P, "r e.�r {r1 `1 e a •ii � ��� ��'aktry f �``+t"��'[ tt t BETWEEN M1 r RANg TTIt & 1 CONCORD 2- 66- ��T?wA�-.�i AREA CODE 6D, Efi � E6 b { [ MAP COORD• '.• '' :i J• 53137 PRIVATE ALARIq SY5 CONNECTED To TE FROM ADT , .,,: �: ■ HEAT DE CT=ON E UI ` Q PIMT , Y ' ,• ���A•RRaW VAN &STORAGE 1641 C"A - ENGE /LDT Bok, 513 +t .' a '• �t . n t'�* t� t QYti i� a ��.�r i - ` ,� � •' � �. r c. � r i k {"x a��a + ,��i��- T -� r��•4,r �' �G u.z �� 2r,.� ..��.'4 h2 h t, '•e, > i � rx•', �� Y v � iyt ¢�S 'Ffzl. � €��^ f'„` � - ,. ,gyp y r s+�7r a r...:wi.;.,�,'�f'r�?. , f-r uq. .... i RADIO BOX s74 (ACTUAI. MIDEft 09874) FOR MESSAGE p PULLED ,AT THE BOX - „� , INITIAL RESPONSE'. ROLL'FULL ASSIMENT -» USE AREA CODE 9E LOCATION: PACHECO BLVD AND BUCHANON CIRCLE SOUTH FOR MESSAGE ll KNOCKDOWN TP14PER t ; s 121ITIAL RESPONSE: ONE UNIT CODE TWO TO CHECK OUT ;�, ;t3' LOCATIOIN: PACHECO BLVD AND BUCHANON CIRCLr- SOUTH*. IN, !��troat MAP COORD: G1.3 47/47 AREA CODE: 9E 9127177 s0 PACHECO BLVD & BUCfiANCki CIR S. RADIO ,BOX 874 4t Y, 36 f" prc ST V2.RYS ST & S T 1•1 RYS C T ; IIARTIY�,'Z , c ` i AREA CODE 14B E14 E13 E12 BC2 MAP COORD Gll 29/48 CIRCUIT 4 F TYPE 1134-73 3/5/75 MPD 4 WD ST MARYS 'ST tc ST MARYS CT MARTINEZ s 11! f �5 pz q a.• 1' c t / ti i Vi DENALECT ALARM u4418 INITIAL RESPONSE: FULL USE AREA CODE 1J AUTOtdATIC SMOKE DETECTION SY,SMM LOCATED AT .ACCOUNT ANT OFFICE '•••,`:c• _1302 PINE ST., ,`• WAL*JUT CREEK, ' BETWEEN NORTH BROADWAY AND PJORTH CIVIC DR {.1� MAP COORD: Mil, Lah-7 AREA CODE: 1Jt' TEL NBR 934-8087 1 5/2/77 �WCPD Elfm 4 , 1302 PINE ST.� WC .... ALARM 4418 4 •" '�, ' tit. r t 4 INDICA'i 5 T—!2a, -OF SIG2'IAL ;PR 011 ENCODER IN EQUIPMENT ROOM OF STATION 1_4 WHICH TRANSMITS GAI,1EI-ELL SIGNALS ' TO FIRE ALAR."I. i PROBLEM! COULD BE CAUSED BY OIJE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING a. Encoder Failure At Station 34. f' b.- Telephone Line Failure Between S14 And 4i The County Administration Bldg. c. Loss Of Microwave Path Between Martinez And Kreagor. d. Lose Of Microwave Path Between Kreagor and '. Fire Alarm (Alarm 5201) e. Blown Fuse In Multiplex (Alarm 5203) ;{ t. Loss Of Multiplex Channel Between Martinez and Fire Alarm (Alarm 520)4) NOTIFY COUNTY COI5IUNICATIOIJS IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY CON,11 NICATIONS SUPERVISOR t MARC EgUIPMENT S14 ALARM 5300 �r'J 1 1 _ .tr ' c isFiV I� h TN"�"t+ r AUT3'tkTIC Tj7,L--"K0i4Z DIALER i1T.AP,'.•s S_r3TZ'i4 C0*T1. CTED TO THE, REST-Da- ICE, OF SLR. .LRRE:y JACKSO-74 155 JET' 11E DR GROSS ST RUTH DR & SIHIRLEY DR. PAJE SANT HILL 825-8117 %2.p COOP.D: j14 49/3!t AREA CODE: 5S E5• F,9 E6 RC2 This alarm is connected to 8 rate-of-rise detectors. There is an audible signal located on the right 'side of the house and will, ring .for 15 minutes after the syster: has 'stT- been activated. ";Al Pysten is maintained by the oumer. i. Emergency Telephare Plumbers 'Marren Jackson Iiomerr 825--8117 :•,ork 634-»2000 Ext 202 W. R. Jackson Home{ 934-3363 James Dellecci Homer 655-4862 5/27/76 ' V PHPD GG',-1D 155 MME DR.., PL-k,901T HILL AUTO DIALER 7 0155) ff 4 y 4 r . ' n >n-. } } 1 �s � r1,�'" I: f , '. ➢ � 1 s ` tr L a { •c.l.,i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 3/77 161-03 INFORIATION SHEET TOPIC: _ MARC Equipment Alarm Point Assignment INRODITCTION The following list briefly explains the alarm point assignments for the MARC equipment. INFORMATION: 5100 - Encoder 51 signal failure. 5101 - AC power failure to tape logging recorder clock. 5102 - 5103 - 5104 - 5104 - 5106 - 5107 - 5108 - 5109 - 5no - 5ul - 5112 - 5113 - 5114 - 5115 - 5116 - 5200 - Encoder 52 signal, failure. 5201' - Microwave Receiver (SS-2000) alarm. 5202 - Microwave Transmitter (SS-2000) alarm. 5203 - Multiplex Fuse Alarm (LD2) 5204 -- Orderwire Fuse Alarm 5205 - 12 volt battery #1 low voltage or failure. 5206 - 12 volt battery #2 low voltage or failure. 5207 - 24 volt Central Station power supply failure. (Bay Alarm Co) 5208 - 24 volt Central Station poorer supply failure. (Denalect Alarm Co) 5209 - Telephone Company poker supply failure. 5210 - 12 volt mechanical equipment room supply fuse alarm. 5211 - Microwave Receiver (FM-2000) Alarm. 5212 - Microwave Transmitter (FM-2000) Alarm. 5213 - Multiplex Fuse Alarm (36A) 5214 - 5215 - 5216 - 5300 - Encoder 53 signal failure. (From station 14) 5301 - Alarm Circuit 1 conditioned to ground. 5302 - Alarm Circuit 2 conditioned to ground. 5303 -- Alarm Circuit 3 conditioned to ground. 5304 - Alarm Circuit 4 conditioned to ground. 5305 - Alarm Circuit 5 conditioned to ground. 5306 - Charger Fail 5307 - A/C power .failure 5308 - Box 24 tripped - needs resetting 1. 530g - 5310 - 53 11 OQ�'12� t{ i i,.v, ti f I 1 1� 1 3 I � SECTION A - 4 SELECTED POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Ur l W Of A 1 � � _ I I �7 1 421 �e s 4t t I I �.rVI�,;.4�.< CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT VEHICLE AND APPARATUS SUMMARY SEDANS AND PICKUPS Sedans 32 Pickups 14 Vans 3 Station Wagons 1 50 r' APPARATUS Pumpers - (includes 1926 LaFrance) 29 Truck Companies 85' Platform 2 85' Aerial 1 100' Aerial 1 Power Wagons 10 Tankers & Water Supply 5 f 98 SUPPORT UNITS Fire Alarm Van 1 Flat Bed Crane 1 Wrecker 1 Lube Unit 1 Air Cascade Unit 1 Forklift 1 Graders 2 8 AIRCRAFT Air I (Beaver) 1 1 . TOTAL 107 y NOTE:' _Excludes 2 Ford Wildland Chassis 403 ` �c x r 8AY f r r . t CONTRA COSTA COUiJTX CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT F OLTCY--�� TOPIC: Response Priorities Policy The constant increase in medical emergencies causes two concerns: Simultaneous calls for the same station, and keeping station.; areas covered as much, as possible. 1. Simultanrraus calls. Apply response priorities. Priorities are: E Medical emergencies Structure fires } Exterior fires Public service. calls Any company can be diverted from a lower priorit�C to cover a higher priority incident. p r ty Example: E-8 is dispatched to an I1-W response. A medical ewer enc occurs in 8 s area. Re-assiga 8 to the medical emer en 8 y Tanker 1 for 8 an the grass fire. emergency. Substitute 2. Consider units on public service calls " ra Do empty a move-up station to cover StationsI or�6 becuasenot "redy'of I'snot or 1 6's public service call. RC:Jdz ' SUBJECT: Response Priorities DATE: June 10, 1977. Policy F. .,, 003 �5 DISPOSITION: File in Area Code and Response t _ iz.:S ,! i • r ft X�y 37.* ,� ,, tr a;',-� F,i n �, � Tr'' 3 �G y t "t`t ""rii,'"I{' {."�r. i ' {S r : S ° �+t � '?�:��4 "s'`4 r1,P +.:�1� :�4 •�' `�4� "�` 3 a�.�r r'� 't r. . °� tr, 1 �� = �Y �a C014TRA COSTA COMITY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 6/77 190-,03 AREA CODE & RESPONSE GUIDE RESPONSE POLICIES FIftES•s Reported structure fires. 0 . . r • • • • Full assigranent Interior fires, confined to small resistive unit. . « . . . Engine Co. Interior fires, -possibility of.spread . . . • . . « • . Full assignment Unknown type of fire. . • • • • • • Full assignment Odor of smoke or other smell. • • w • . . • • • • • • • • . Engine Co, , Vehicle fire, in a structure. • • . . • « . . • • . . . Full assignment Vehicle fire, outside . . . . . . . . • . . • . • Engine Co. Grass or brush fire, non-wildland area* . . . . . Engine Co: Grass or brush fire, wildland area. • • . • . Full assignment (Wildland) `M MEDICAL AND/OR RESCUE: For assistance to a victim of a heart attack, OD, etc « . . Engine Co. For minor rescue, ie victim has part of his body caught Engine or.Truck•Co, For major rescue, ie victim trapped . • . • . • « • . . . Engine and Truck Co. For assistance to more than one victim. . • . . . . « . . . Engines and Trucks as required. For an unknown rescue • . . « . « • . . • • « .. . Engine and Truck Co. AUTOINIATIC OR MANUAL ALARM SYSTEMS For municipal box alarms. . . . . . As indicated on card For registered private alarms . • As indicated on card For un-registered private alarms. . . . . . Full assignment For alarm bells ringing - no confirmed fire . • • . . Engine Co. For waterflow bell ringing. . . . . . . . . . • . . . Full assignment . , .. i ra..;;: .. .. ,_ .., _.. _ 'a7,t.,isk>.,.,_.-.rtl•eanYf�'1{�d..�:,Ca°Il:Ali✓.u��a�4?3're�aba. ``.rhU's�d.'•ta�'rAr�.'auh;"q}�!a'Ow.Fs4'Pi�h'I"L^W` "�� ! W' �rrx€.f�^1z'1t 7d 5 6/77 190-03N MISC. RESPONSES .For aircrafts train, or bus accidents . Full assignment (Truck) Flammable Liquid Spills, minor. . . . . . Engine Co. Flammable Liquid Spills, major. . . . Full assignment plus Cascada Non-flammable Liquid Spills . . . . . . Engine Co. Chlorine Leaks. . . . . . . . o Engine Co. plus E5 OTHER POLICIES When assigned companies are out of service,. (RED).. the next due companies will be used to fill out the assignment. Dispatchers may reduce or increase the response in the event of unusual circumstances. The first arriving company officer is the incident commander and is responsible for estimating needs and ordering additional alarms and/or equipment until relieved by the battalion chief. One Engine Co. is to be kept free for vicinity alarms. A single apparatus may be special called. ,i 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT 6/77 l9o-o4 AREA CODE tz RESPONSE GUIDE NOR1,1AL MANNING ASSUMPTIQIS IRTRODUCTION: The following normal manning practices are assumed. If they are deviated from, it will be necessary to notify the communications center of the change. STATION 1: Two crews available manning one of the following combinations: First Engine & Second Engine - Driver left for Truck, Tanker RED. First Engine & Truck -• Second Engine & Tanker RED. First Engine & Tanker - Driver left for Truck,, Second Engine R Tanker & Truck - First and Second Engines RED. STATION 2: One crew manning their Engine. One man from the crew available to man the Water Supply. STATION 3: One crew manning their Engine. STATION 4: One crew manning either the Engine or the Power Wagon. STATION 5: One crew manning their Engine. STATION 6: Two crews available manning one of the following combinations: First Engine & Second Engine •- Driver left for Truck, PW RED. First Engine & Truck - Second Engine & PW RED. First Engine & Power Wagon - Driver left for Truckj, Second Engine R Power Wagon & Truck - First and Second Engines RED, STATION 8: One crew manning their Engine. STATION 9: One crew manning their Engine. 00378 STATION 10: One.err, r n tan' 6/77 190-OLLA STATIM 11: One crew manning either the Engine or the Po,,rer Wagon. STATION 12: One crew manning either the Engine or the Power Wagons Reserves available to man their Engined the Tanker,, or any apparatus not manned by S12 crew. flim reserves are called,, one crew is assumed. STATION 13: One crew manning either their Engine or the reserves Engine. ;(Wildland Responses Reserves available to man the apparatus left in the station. STATION 14: One crew manning either their Engine,, the Trucks,'-:or -the Power Wagon. If the Engine responds.,alone' ii-driver is left for the Truck. If both the Engine & Truck respond'v the Truck is manned by a driver only. If the Power Wagon responds.,'a driver -is,left for the Truck. Reserves available to man their Engine.9 or the Power Wagon. One reserve crew is assumed. STATION 15: One crew manning either the Engine or the Power Wagon, STAT IO14 16: One crew manning either the Engine or the Power Wagon. STATION 17: One crew manning their Engine. One man from the crew available to man the Cascade Unit, STATION 18: Reserves manning their Engine. STATION 19: Reserves manning their Engine and/or Power Wagon. A Water Supply unit is also available, . 00. j51... ... ,:Ftp__ .. �v+ K.k.. ., � L°•. .. - .t - ,., ,_ .�. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT POLICY TOPIC: Apparatus running - Stations 1, 6, and 14 INTRODUCTION: The number of men remaining at these stations changes from time to time due to emergency responses, special. details, etc. This guide has been developed to provide consistency in manning practices and to assist the Communications Center and station personnel. cm POLICY- •, RESPO:JSE,No. of Mien E, EA E,•TK TK Only 8 4 3 4 4 4 •7 3 .3 3 4 4 6 3 2 3 3 3 5 (1) 3 2 3 •2 3 4 3 Red "(3) 3 1 4 (2) 3 3 Red (3) 2 1 • 3 2 2 Red (4) 2 Red •2 (5)Red 2 Wildland apparatus:, 3 mea Trucks are "Red" if the driver is absent. *Return driver toquarkera as soon as possible. (1) Notify Communications Center that truck is "Red". (2) Respond with thre* men to medical emergencies. (3) - Special call third engine for manpower (except Stn. 14) . (4) First due area. (5) Other areas. WC:Jdl ' . . -• ' . '7 SUBJECT: Apparatus Manning Stations 1, 6, and 14 DATE: November 5, 1976 DISPOSITION: Place in Area Code and Response Guide Replaces Policy November, 1974. 00380 t . '.�. � '` ✓'. �..� f # .' , ' '4!� fir S., - o. .. ♦ .Y _ v .',9::, 1 ., CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT POLICY ' '.COPIC: "A" Engine Response Policies POLICY: , Captains may dispatch the "A" engines instead of the primary engine to any single engin* fixes or public service calls (not smoke investigations) . .CONDITIONS: 1. The Captain will bear full responsibility for the actions or results produced by his crew. 2. The job shall be appropriate for -the size crew. 3. The assignment shall not disrupt the response system (making truck or wildland units "red") . N Captains are urged to use this discretion thoughtfully and/or abide by the instructions of their Battalion Chief.. VC, dl SUBJECT: "A" Engine Response Policies DATE: June 10, 1977 D3 SPt1SIT:[�N: F�l e atl Pa , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT STA14DARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TOPIC: Plan I INTRODUCTION: The objective of Plan 1 is to supplement departmental strength from off.?-duty and reserve firefighters. Plan 1 is activated for large fires, multiple fires, or disasters. It is initiated automatically on third alarm mercantile and wildland fires, and otherwise at the discretion of a chief officer. It begins with dispatchers assigning personnel- to the Command Center (Plan 1) . CONCEPT: Rapid recall and assignment of personnel to weakened areas.. PROCEDURE: 1. Ilan, Command Center a. Use dial cards under "Operations Office" h. Three man team c. Include Chief officer,if possible. 2. Determine coverage needs a. Dispatcher assistance b. Stations 3. Relocate companies where possible a. Policy; Every other station; no two adjacent stations open. 4. Mak ' Tnanning assigpMents a. Communication, Cent6r. first b. Reserves c: Recall. off—duty nen 1) use appropriate- telephone cards 2) Refer to Comm Center for unmanned apparatus location 3) Four men per engine 4) Record on Overtime Sheftt NOTE: Personnel recalled are instructed to report to' station specified and confirm presence to Command Center by using*"Vocal 35". Do not call Communications Center. d. Assign required staff help, chief officer, public relations, mechanic. 5. Reduce respbases if circumstances warrant a. Wo engines to structure fires and boxes. b. Dispatchers give* APB re: Reduced response. 6. Prepare for relief and feeding. 0038- ' WC:Jdl UB"t IL B-1 Appendix B '• Street Name Characteristics This appendix details some of the important street name characteristics in this District. These details are meant to assist vendors with sizing mass storage space and developing methods for information access. The District has 4,175 streets with the following alphabetic characteristic: A - 244 J - 79 S - 503 B - 362 K - 108 T - 168 C - 473 L - 282 U - 8 D - 201 M - 426 V - 129 E - 175 N - 122 W - 243 F - 138 0 - 100 X - 1 G - 176 P - 236 Y - is H - 232 Q - 11 Z - 2 I - 38 R - 226 The largest alphabetic group based on the first two letters is MA-160. There is an average of five intersections for each street. The longest street name is Upper Happy Valley Road. One intersection has three community jurisdictions on various sides of the intersection. One street runs through two different cities with the same address range in each city. 00383 �5,. U CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ° CONSOLIDATED FIRE DISTRICT Re, D I9'r R\ FIRE CHIEF BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS A. V. Streuli Ralph L. Aldrich 2010 Geary Road Edward B. Haynes Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Richard F. Holmes Leo F. Smarsh TELEPHONE (415)939-3400 Harold E.Wildes April 26, 1978 SUBJECT: C.A.D. Memo #1 Dear Due to an error in mailing, various vendors have not received their copy of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District's Computer Aided Dispatch Request for Proposal in a timely manner. Because of this error, it was felt that vendors could not adequately prepare for the Vendor's Conference as scheduled, so the following dates have been changed. Paragraph 9.4 Proposed Conference. Change to May 9, 1978 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time. Paragraph 9.5 Closing Date. Change to May 30, 1978 at 5:00 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time. These changes have been made in the interest of providing all vendors adequate time to prepare and respond to the R.F.P. In addition, please make the following change to your R.F.P. Paragraph 6.2,2.2.3 title should read "STATUS FUNCTIONS" not STATION FUNCTIONS. Any vendor that has not received their copy of the R.F.P. please contact me by telephone immediately. Sincerely, Roy A. Bell Inspector 00384 C.A.D. Project Manager (415) 939-3400 { RAB:jd1 EXHIBIT,-A - 3 { r .I" ' S lr! p the cr7�tna�{{es 0f C/oytor�Pqn card, r arayettt,Martlnex;P14 $94it�H/Ili it t i;. i I n tnut Cres ,nrrd coinsFflff t C/ 't tl� i {y.(t! ;fit 4 x `E TRA AND ON Eagle Signal Corporation PUB"CSAFE YID VISION! e Gulf+Western Manufacturing Company 8004 Cameron Road Austin,Texas 78753 512-837-8300 Telex 77-8498 May '30, 1978 Contra Costa Fire Protection District Attention Roy A. Bell Program Manager 2010 Geary Road Pleasant Hill, Calif. 94523 Gentlemen: Eagle Signal Corporation, a Gulf + Western Manufacturing Company, is pleased to submit the enclosed Bid Proposal and Price Proposal for a Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System. The submitted material is in response to the request for proposals dated April 29, 1978, by the Contra Costa Fire Protection District. The proposed Computer Aided Dispatch System will be de- signed to enable the Fire District to provide more prompt and effective fire fighting services to the citizens and visitors of central Contra Costa County. It will be prepared under the direction of one of the most experienced systems groups in the fire service field. Eagle Signal looks forward to a continuing relationship with Contra Costa Fire Protection District and will do all it can to meet the special needs of this growing community. Very trulyt y �, John S. Strance _ _President 0038) ` I JSSjgm l EXHIBIT H'.— 1 a. Eagle 4 Cr~ � TRAFFIC CC�+{T QL5 � � . `$ 'well �, t NEMER ENCYC�aM UNICATICNS f 4 X¢ a a'{.`,,A' x r ��` ';c . :4 t R 5 r- ..do i,.4, ,..1. .._�c, .i'+., i,Y•.. txy r:W'�,+ .tir. y. _ ..,� i7 n; S iw i3y: Eagle Signal Corporation TRANSPORTATIONLIS TIISION 8004 Cameron Road a Gull+Western Manufacturing Company Austin,Texas 76753 512-837-8300 Telex 77.6498 BID PROPOSAL CONTRA COSTA FIRE PROTECTIOda DISTRICT COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH! i EXHIBIm�H 2 MAY 30, 1978 T "�F T r� I F� nv.r �. ,i, r'"T nN f CONTRA COSTA COMPUTER AIDED ,DISPATCH . SYSTEM Bid Proposal Index I. Business Organization r; II. Authorized Negotiators III. Statement of the Problem IV, Technical Description 4 . 1 Computer Aided)Dispatch Hardware 4 .1.1, ' Equipment List FIGUI2F? '1-Equipment Block Diagram Electrical Requirements Mechanical Requirements Environmental Requirements 4 . 1.2 Video Display Units Keyboards 4 .1 . 3 Computer :'Power Fail/Automatic Restart Real Time Clock :' Instruction Set` 4 ,1. 4 Cartridge - Subsystem " 4 . 1. 5 Diskette Subsystem 4 .1 . 6 Communications 'Subsystem 4 . 1 . 7 Master Terminal 4 . 1 . 8 Printer _. 4 , 1 . 9 Equipment Enclosures 4 . 1. 10 Operating System Software 00387 4 . 2 . 11 Fumigation Display 4 . 2 . 12 Record Keeping 4 . 2 .13 Status Log 4 . 2 . 14 Data Base Modification` 4 . 2 .15 Messages 4 . 2 .16 Quick Reference File 4 . 2 .17 Training Mode 4 . 3 Options 4 .3.1 Mobile Status System,' Option A 4 . 3. 1 .1 Hardware 4 . 3 . 1. 2 Operation 4 . 3.2 Mobile Status System Stand Alone , Option B 4 . 3. 3 Radio Box Interface Option 4 . 3 . 4 Station Printer System Option 4 . 3 . 4 . 1 Hardware Station- 'Printer 'Stat i'an Modem/Cont"Y�ller- communication's Center Modems Computer' Interface Unit 4 . 3 . 4 . 2 System Operation ' 4 . 3. 5 Uninterruptable Power Supply Option- 4 . 3 . 6 Magnetic Tape Unite Option 4 . 3 . 7 Dual Disk Option 4 . 3 . 8 Statistical Analysis ReportsOption, 4 . 3. 9 Fire Personnel- Recall File' Option 4 . 3 .10 Dual. Computer-Option' J( 4 . 3 . 11 Exp'inde`d 'Training 'Capabi1itie s="Option - �� i 9.7 Hardware Capabilities 9 . 8 Factory Service 9. 9 Rights to Software Appendix Z Product Specifications i Appendix YI Preliminary System Description Vi r tt { rt I�.%• 'S - ` .. c S, C �;3 5. t Y tiY=y7! 111 CONTRA COSTA COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH . SYSTEM Bid: Proposal index I. Business Organization II. Authorized Negotiators III . Statement of the Problem IV. Technical Description 4 . 1 Computer Aided Dispat6h Hardware 4 .1:1� " Equipment Lisp. FIGURE 'l-Equipment Block Diagram Electrical Requirements Mechanical Requirements Environmental Requirements 4 . 1. 2 Video Display Units Keyboards 4 . 1 . 3 Computer Power Fail/Automatic Restart Real Time Clock Instruction Set' 4 . 1. 4 Cartridge Subsystem ' 4 . 1. 5 Diskette Subsystem 4 . 1 . 6 Communications 'Subsystem 4 . 1. 7 Master Terminal 4 . 1. 8 Printer 4 .1 . 9 Equipment Enclosures 4 . 1 . 10 Operating System Software 003 4 . 2 Computer Aided Dispatch Functional Description 4-;2. 1 Log -on/Log off • 4 .2 . 2 Alarm`Receiot"and Dispatch 4 . 2 . 2 .1 Alarm Receipt Reported Location Location Aids A. Street ,Address B . Intersection C. Building/Place Name, . ._D. Area, Code Location/Caller .Details Box, Alarms Type of Incident : 4 . 2 . 2 . 2 Alarm Dispatch Incident Queue Cancelled Incident- Additional Dispatch 4 . 2 . 3 Move-ups 4 . 2 .4 Map Coveragel, Display Coverage Alert 4 . 2 . 5 Unit Status Status Updates 4 . 2 . 6 Mutual Aid Status 4 . 2 .7 Incident Status 4 . 2 . 8 System Alerts ;. .; 4 . 2 . 9 Hydrant Status 4 . 2 .10 Closed Streets Display • 4 . 2 . 11 Fumigation' Display • 4 , 2 . 12 Record Keeping, P g 4 . 2 . 13 Status Log' ' 4 . 2 . 14 Data Rase Modification' 4 . 2 .15 Messages 4 . 2 . 16 Quick Reference File 4 . 2 .17 Training Mode 4 . 3 options 4 . 3 . 1 Mobile Status System, 'Option` A''' ' 4 . 3 . 1 . 1 Hardware 4 . 3 .1. 2 Operation 4 . 3 . 2 Mobile Status System Stand Alone , Option B 4 . 3. 3 Radio Box Interface Option 4 . 3 . 4 Station Printer System Option 4 . 3 . 4 . 1 Hardware Station- Printer Station Modem/Controller • Communi'cation'sCenter Modems Computer Interface Unit 4 . 3 . 4 . 2 System Operation 4 , 3 . 5 Uninterruptable Power Supply Option• ' 4 . 3 , 6 Magnetic Tape Unit' Option 4 . 3 . 7 Dual Disk Option 4 . 3 . 8 Statistical Analysis ' Reports Option, ' 4 . 3. 9 Fire Personnel ' Recall Fil'e''Opt-iron 4 . 3 .10 Dual Computer'Option • 4 . 3. 11 Exp'anded 'Traininq 'Capabilities 'Option 4 . 4 Acceptance Test Procedure 4 . 5 Reliability and Back-up • 4 . 5 . 1 Manual Operations 4 . 6 Documentation 4 . 7 Training 4 . 8 Warranty 4 . 9 Spare Parts V. Work Plan and Schedule VI . Management-,Summary, _ VII. Related Corporate Experience 7 . 1 Organization and Facilities 7 .1 . 1 Engineering Department 7 . 1 . 2 ,. Systems Department 7 . 1 . 3 Manufacturing Operations 7 . 2 Experience 7 . 2 .1 Washington D.C. Emergency Communications System 7 . 2 .2 Seattle-Audio, Message System 7 .2 . 3 Buffalo , Eme,rgency Communications System VIII. Personnel and , Qualifications 8 . 1 Project Manager 8 . 2 Work Location IX, Additional Information 9 . 1 Proposal Acceptance; Period 9 . 2 Progress , Payments 9 . 3 Structural Alterations 9 . 4 Contract Maintenance 9 . 5 Software, ,Development Location. . . • 00`aJ� 9 . 6 System Capabilities ` 9.7 Hardware Capabilities 9 . 8 Factory Service 9 . 9 Rights to Software Appendix I Product Specifications Appendix II Preliminary System Description f I Business Organization The proposed Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System is offered by: G+W Eagle Signal Corporation 8004 Cameron Road Austin, Texas 78753 512 - 837-8300 Eagle Signal Corporation is a wholly subsidiary of Gulf+Western, Inc. Eagle Signal Corporation is incur- ' porated in the State of Delaware. Eagle Signal also maintains sales offices in Fullerton, California. • II Authorized Negotiators The following individuals are authorized to negotiate with Contra Costa Fire Protection District on behalf of Eagle Signal Corporation: Mr. John L. Schlaefli Systems Manager Eagle Signal Corporation 8004 Cameron Road Austin, Texas 78753 512 837=8429 Mr. Robert E"'. Smith Product Specialist Y Eagle Signal Corporation 8004 Cameron Road Austin, Texas, 78753 512 - 837-8393 Statement of the Problem The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District serves an area of 185 square miles with a current population of approximately 250 ,000. Last year it responded to about 8, 600 incidents which was a 17 percent increase over the previous year. Continued growth in the number of res- ponses is expected. A computer aided dispatch system will. enhance the Fire District' s ability to meet this growing demand for its services. A computer aided dispatch system has been shown to be a cost effective alternative to the current manual dispatch system used by the District. * Eagle Signal Corporation , as a leading supplier of emergency communication equipment to fire departments , is throughly familiar with the requirements of a fire dispatch center and has developed computer aided dispatch systems to meet these requirements. The basic philosophy governing the design of these systems has been that the system must serve the particular needs of the department and that the depart- ment should not have to significantly change its mode of operation to meet arbitrary constraints imposed by the system. The tail should not wag the dog. While the basic functions of alarm receipt, dispatching, status maintenance and record keeping are common to all fire departments , Eagle Signal recognizes that each department has different operating pro- cedures and requirements which result from the unique con- ditions to which it .must respond. Therefore, Eagle Signal has developed a computer aided dispatch system package with sufficient flexibility .to enable .it to ,be tailored to meet the particular requirements of each department. It consists of functional modules which, can be assembled like building blocks to form a, totalsystem. . Each module can be. modified relatively easily without the necessity of changing;, the whole system. Eagle Signal's Computer Aided Dispatch System provides for: - the maintenance and continuous display of status information - the rapid entry of alarm information with many aids and error correcting features provided by the computer - the immediate display of pertinent dispatch information,,including conditions in„the vicinity of the incident and a suggested dispatch - the positive acknowledgement of dispatches - the display of coverage information and moveup requirements - the updating ,of incident information and dispatch of additional units - the maintenance of complete records - the automatic alerting of dispatches to specified conditions, as they arise the restriction of system access, to authorized users - the sending„of m essages _. , r, - the simple modification of the data base 00304 tt' .', qW V All displays are designed to ,provide the pertinent infor- mation in an easily comprehensible format with different dis- play modes used to highlight important information. Entry of information has been simplified through the use of function keys and computer generated aids displayed to the dispatcher. This "standard" system will be tailored to meet the particular requirement of the Contra Costa County Fire Pro- tection District. For example, the District maintains more first line units than it does crews. This will require the computer aided dispatch system not only to keep track of the status and location of units , but also to keep track of the manpower available at each station. In addition, certain units do not always require a full crew. The computer aided dispatch system will designate units as conditionally available for dispatch where a full crew is not required. The concept of conditional availability is also used by the Fire District for units which will be unable to respond immediately. Coupled with the concept of conditional availability is that of the priority of incidents. Medical emergencies involving a threat to life have the highest priority with fires having the next highest priority. Non-life threatening medical emergencies and other non fire incidents (e.g. wash downs) have lower priorities. A unit assigned to a low priority incident is conditionally available p y y for redispatch to a higher priority incident. The computer aided dispatch system will allow the District to continue these procedures. The District' s assignment cards that require special consideration are of two types , namely; structure and wild land. Each card also has preplanned moveups associated with the dispatch. however, if there are several active incidents in the same part of the District at the same time , the pre- planned moveups often become inoperable. Dispatchers must then make moveups or call up reserves based on District guidelines (e.g. man key stations , don' t leave two adjacent stations unmanned, etc. ) The computer aided dispatch system, through the use of a coverage display and system alerts should :provide the necessary aids to assist the dispatcher in making proper decisions as these situations arise. The computer aided dispatch system should also be easily expandible to handle future requirements . These may take the form of more incidents as a result of growth within the District, added capabilities to handle other Fire District functions (e .g. , the generation of management reports) and the expansion of the communications center ' s responsibility to other areas in the county. with the coming of "911" , it is likely that the communications center will dispatch fire units for most, if not all of the county. The computer aided dispatch system should be designed to handle this major expansion. 00;J( i The proposed Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System as designed by Eagle Signal Corporation and as described in the following sections , will meet the current and future needs of the District. Its design is based on computer aided dispatch systems developed for the District of Columbia and Seattle Fire Departments. Most of the software and hard- ware configuration is based upon these systems. It will be provided under a turnkey arrangement with Eagle Signal res- ponsible for developing and installing the system, providing manuals, training District personnel and providing mainte- nance for the system after it is installed. Eagle Signal Corporation has the management and techni- cal capabilities and experience to perform these functions. The Critical Path Method (CPM) will be used to schedule each task and define milestones. Periodic reviews will be held to insure that the project proceeds on schedule. A close working relationship will be established with key District personnel to coordinate all facets of the project. IV Technical Description 11 This section is a technical descriptionrof the proposed Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch ,System being offered on a turnkey basis `by .Eagle Signal Corporation. -The des- cription includes hardware, software, options , technical specifications and support requirements necessary for a fully operational. system. Reference .is made .to the ;basid:"computer aided dispatch system which constitutes ,the. baseline system .being offered. The basic system is not dependent, upon 'the addition of the requested system options to be an operational. system. The description also includes options required by Contra Costa to further enhance the basic computer aided dispatch system. The options include a mobile status reporting subsystem, a station printers subsystem, an uninterruptable 'power supply,ta .dual� computer.system; a -dual disk memory system,and magnetic tape unit. Software enhancement options include _a :fire personnel, recall tile, statistical , analysis reports, -.and-expanded training capabilities. OQ gg 4 .1 Computer Aided Dispatch Hardware The Contra Costa Y - Computer Aided :Dis atchS stem will • P P consist of all computer hardware and peripherals required to perform,the ;functions♦ describe& in this technical descrip- tion. Figure 1 is a block diagram of-the -hardware. There are three dispatch positions , each consisting of a status video display unity :!a working!-video display unit.--and A,:,keyboard and two call taker/.trainee positions' ;,each:,consisting of a working video: display unit and a keyboard. The computer system consists:of a central processing unit and memory, a disk unit, a floppy disk unit, communications chassis and multiplexer, and a control terminal. AL log 'printer is also provided. All hardware will be installed in the communi- cations center. The .'hardware components..will: consist of '.theifollowing equivalent equipment: 4 . 1. 1 Equipment :List Quantity 'Description ' Model J ; 1 Nova 3D Mini-computer with 64K words MOS parity DG 8586 memory 1 Real Time Clock DG 4008 1 Input/Output Board DG 4007 • 003y9 , 1, ` • t 3 1 .y 11 r i � • Quantity Description Model 1 Cartridge Disk Subsystem DG 6045 10 M Byte 1 Diskette Subsystem Dual DG 6030 Drive 315 K Byte 1 Master Terminal Printer DG 6040 1 Serial Matrix Printer DG 4034C 1 Communications Chassis DG 4251 1 16 Line Communications DG 4257 Multiplexer 4 EIA Boards DG 4261 3 Video Display Units Ann Arbor 531 Monitors Only 5 Video Display Units Ann Arbor 531 with Keyboards 2 Cabinet Enclosure DG 1012K An appendix with manufacturer product bulletins is included in the last section of this document. The above equipment will be supplied and installed with all necessary cabling, terminal blocks, and enclosures for the proper operation of the system. All equipments are of proven design and use accepted engineering practices. Equipment will be of high quality workmanship and will be manufactured by well known, reputable firms . • 00400 ,y'+ • Lh A H H E-4 pi�7 H AS H U O U W �h q U) H H H U U Goq W A 9+ ` D ;P1, —0 04 0 q� Um rl HH U a H elM < p r-I fi H a U Ra c � w x a a � 01 w a ow x U H V - Electrical Requirements All central office equipment will at a minimum, operate from a standard electrical supply of. from 105 to 126 VAC at 57 to 63 HZ . Normal line transients will not cause improper operation of the system. The computer aided dispatch system will require about 30 Amps of standard 117 VAC power. However, .it is recommended that 50 AMP service be supplied to allow for„ system expan- sion. A breaker box should be located in the computer room to distribute AC power. Mechanical Requirements All components will be installed either in the existing console structures or in . cabinets supplied. with the system. The cabinet enclosures will be . of _free . standing steel frame design. The enclosures and equipment will be co-ordinated in a color mutually, agreed upon at contract award., The computer, disks, communications chassis and multi- plexer and their power supplies will be mounted in two enclosures. If the mobile status system, , station printers , magnetic tape, and radio ,box interface options, are, imple- mented, one (1)_ additional .enclosure ,will be required. it is recommended that these enclosures and the master terminal be located in the room adjacent to the communications shop. 004 The dispatcher video display units will be rack mounted in existing consoles and the two other working video display units will be housed in their own cabinets for placement on tabletop. All keyboards will be separately housed to enable each user to position it as he desires. Contra Costa Fire Protection District will provide space, cabi.e ducts and electrical outlets to accommodate these units . Environmental Requirements The computer room should be maintained at a temperature between 160C and 3200 and a relative humidity between 20'6 and 80% . An air conditioning system having a capacity of 20, 000 BTU' s should be sufficient to maintain the computer room within these limits. The video display units and keyboards will be located in the communications room and will operate in its present environment. 4 .1 . 2 Video Display Units The video display units will be Ann Arbor terminal Model 531 or equal. They will have a 15 inch diagonal non- glare screens and display twenty-four (24) lines of eighty (30) characters each: Each character can be displayed in any s, oo4� • one of four modes : normal, dim, flashing and reverse video. A specification sheet is provided in the appendix. There will be five working video display units and three status video display units provided with the system. The working video display units will be able to show all dis- plays including the status displays . The status video dis- play units will only show the current unit status or other status displays . Each working video display unit will operate independently of the others . It will also have an audio signal which can be activated by the computer. _ It will also be possible to add more video display units or slave units to the system. The video display units of the three dispatch positions will be rack mounted in the existing consoles. The other two working video display units will be furnished in their own enclosures for table top operation. Keyboards Each working video display unit will have a keyboard from which all operator entries will be made . The keyboards will contain the standard alpha-numeric keys , cursor control keys and twenty-four (24) function • keys . The following keys will be used by the system as 00404 described in the section on. Displays; and Entry Formats. IMM - changes manpower at a station tlU . STAT brings up the Move Up Status Display MovEUP, _ , enters a, moveup ` COVER - . brings up the Coverage ;Display SUMRY - brings up the Summary of Active ' Incidents Display HYDRNT -- brings up the Hydrants Out of Service display STREET - brings up the street closure display ALAP14 -- brings up the Alarm Receipt and Dis- patch display BOK - brings up the Box Alarm display ADD DISP - brings up the Additional Dispatch display 1140 RPT - brings up the Incident Report Display 14ESG - brings up the Message Display MENU -- brings up the Menu display ESCAPE - exits from a display, The status changes will be made using the number pad and a set of function keys . The function keys will identify the new status . - 1 4 .1. 3 Com user A Data General. Nova 3fD computer with sixty--four (64) K 16 bit words of MOS memory which can be expanded to one hundred twenty-eight (128)K words of ,memory will be . �4 • supplied. MOS memory is recommended due to its high relia- bility and ease of maintenance. The computer has the speed to efficiently perform all functions required of this system and will provide satisfactory response times under peak loading conditions . Power Fail/Automatic Restart The mini-computer will be equipped with a power fail/ automatic restart unit which detects loss of power for protection and enables an orderly restart of the system. Real Time clock The mini-computer will be equipped with a quartz con- trolled real time clock. The clock will provide the system time base and will accurately maintain the time of day to the second, and the date without manual correction. The real time clock interrupt frequency is selectable for 1OHz , 60 IIz , 100 Hz and 1000Hz. Instruction Set The mini-computer will use 16 bit, single word multi- function instructions. Logical program instructions will execute any one of eight basic functions , modify the operand , shift the result, and test the result in one cycle . Using any of the addressing modes , memory reference instructions will move data between the memory and accumulators , and • modify the program flow efficiently. C A full set of I/O instructions enable the transfer of data between the processor and the peripherals . - 4 .1.4 Cartridge Subsystem Mass storage will be on a Data General 10 megabyte Cartridge Disk Subsystem Model 6045 . Its specifications are provided in the appendix. — It consists of a controller, a disk drive, . a five (5) megabyte fixed moving head disk and a five (5) megabyte removable moving head disk. This will provide sufficient storage capacity for the computer aided dispatch system. It can be expanded to forty (40) megabyte capacity which will be sufficient for future requirements. 4 .1.5 Diskette Subsystem Eagle Signal Corporation also proposes _to provide a diskette subsystem in place of a magnetic tape unit. This will be a Data General Diskette Subsystem model 6030 . Its specifications are provided in the appendix. It is recom- mended because it is, both more economical and easier to use. It is industry compatible and its . 315 megabytes of• storage will provide sufficient capacity to store the log and incident reports in computer readable form as necessary. A magnetic tape unit is offered as an option. 4 .1. 6 Coimmuh c'atibns Subsystem' The computer system will include a Data General Communi- cations Chassis model 4251 and a Data General 16 line communications multiplexor model 4257 with '4 ETA boards model 4261, `on each-4257 board'. 5pec3'fications 'for these items are provided` in 'the appendix. ' 4 .1 .7 Master Terminal The control terminal�`for''th ' co mputer 's'ystem 'will be a Data General Dasher master terminai' model 6040. It has its own pedestal and' will pring 60 characters per second on standard paper. Its spec are provided in the appendix. 4 .1.8 Printer The system printer will be a Data General. Model 40340 Serial''Matrix Printer'. The' printer 'will- be used to log chronological events, dispatch 'messages adm'in'istrative messages and incident reports . The printer will be free standing ;in proximity to 'th6i' dispatchers. The printer will operate at 165 characters 'a 'second using a dot matrix impact type print head. Printer through- put will be approximately 60 lines per minute. Multiple copy fanfold paper may be used with the printer. Separation between the printed log, messages, and reports wf L,l,e rsured. A technical bulletin further describing the: pr,inter is included in the appendix. 4 .1. 9 Equipment Enclosures „The mini--computer hardware, will ,be, installed in�,all steel cabinets with 19".,wide mounting, bays. The cabinets will be at least 56 inches high and will have centralized power connections for system components . . Each cabinet will . ; be .a 14, gauge, cold,.,rolled, steel. frame with.-,horizontally reinforced.,sides,.. ,base and top. Vertical frame members extend entirely through the base to ;the floor. The frame is protected .by structurally reinforced side panels, louvered top panel and doors. All non-used openings will be covered with filler panels. Each cabinet is designed to minimize the effects of shock and vibration. Ventilation will ,be provided by a 425 .CFM,blower .mounted in the bottom of ,each ,cabinet. ; An AC power.-strip , ismounted vertically ;in the. ba.ck corner of each cabinet. It connects with a NEMA 5-15P .amp plug., 0040 ; Rl t 4 .1 .10 Operating System Software • The operating system software to be provided with the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will consist of operating system and utility software as developed by Data General Corporation. The manufacturer software package will include a real time disk operating system (RDOS) , a FORTRAN s compiler, an assembler, file maintenance program, task building and loading program, real time debug program, utility program, subroutine library, and diagnostics. A manufacturer product bulletin describing the operating system software is included in the appendix. i 00410 Ki , ,r4�yt� A3� 4 .2 Computer Aided Dispatch Functional Description • The functional operations and displays of the Eagle Signal Computer Aided Dispatch System being offered to the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District are described in this section of the bid proposal. The functions described do not include the use of the optional station printer system, radio box interface, or . the mobile digital status system. The functions of these options are described elsewhere in this bid proposal._ The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will : - maintain status of units and crews - permit input of alarm information - display dispatch information - provide unit move-up information - display special conditions at specific emergency locations - display special ' donditions in vicinity' of emergency locations - maintain a chronological event log - print and store incident reports - facilitate data base changes - enable operation in degraded states The Computer Aided Dispatch System will interface with the Contra Costa fire dispatchers and supervisors through a series of working and information displays at video display terminals. These interactive functions will include � '� 00411 log on/log of alarm receipt and dispatch, unit status, incident status, hydrant status , system alerts , record keeping, messages, training mode, quick reference file, and data base modification. 4 .2 . 1 Loog on/Log off The log on/log off function is' used to prevent un- authorized use of the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System. Log on/log off will also provide accountability for all actions taken at individual terminals. Before any user may use a video display unit, he must first log on using the keyboard of that unit by entering the appro- priate command, a name, and a code word known only to the operator. The computer will verify the validity of the user, determine the user' s level of access and record the log on with the date and time on the lag printer. The secret code word will not be displayed or printed. Each user will only be able to interact with the system according to a pre-assigned level of access. A dispatcher, for example, would be unable to modify programs or change the geographic data base. The access levels are deter- mined by the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District and may be changed as required. The pre-assigned access levels may include: - training messages 00412 _ 4 - dispatcher activities data base modifications Once a user has logged on to a specific .video display unit, all actions taken at that terminal will be recorded in that user' s name. The user may lour off at any time using the log off command, name and code word. The log off will be recorded with. the date and time. 4 . 2 . 2 Alarm Receipt and Dispatch The alarm receipt and dispatch function consists of an interactive preformatted display which enables Contra Costa dispatchers to enter alarm information and determine appropriate emergency responses . Verbal alarms may be received over listed telephone or the future 911 telephone system. Mien a voice alarm is received, the dispatcher will elicit from the caller pertinent details about the emergency such as the reported location and type of incident. Once an emergency has been identified and the location is known, the computer will display a suggested dispatch based on, the nearest available, units , and the call priority. Additional units may be dispatched when requested using the additional dispatch display. Moveups will also be facilitated using the computer aided dispatch system. 4 . 2 . 2 .1 Alarm Receipt • When a voice alarm is received, the dispatcher answer- ing it will immediately activate the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch display 'on' his working video display unit. The time of alarm will be ' recorded as the time the display is activated. The dispatcher will be able to enter the type of incident, the reported location, location details and the caller' s phone number and/or name. These entries may be made in any order and the dispatcher will be able to tab back and forth among them. However, only a valid reported location need be entered in order to make a dis- patch. Reported Location The reported location must be entered by the dispatcher. The computer will determine the area code for the location and display a suggested dispatch. The location may be entered as : - a street address - an intersection - a building name - a place name The computer will assist the dispatchers by providing entry aids and will correct certain types of entry errors. 1 k 00414 If a valid location cannot be determined, the dispatcher may enter an area code instead, to enable a dispatch to be made. Once the computer has verified the reported location as being valid, the .following information associated with the location will be displayed; - area code - map coordinates - police jurisdiction and-, beat ;,xumber - water district - ambulance zone -- specific information for the location (e.g. , hazards) - fumigation at the . location - nearby hydrants out of service* - nearby street closures* - nearby active incidents* -- first and second ,alarm assignments - first and second alarm moveups - suggested dispatch *Locations will be considered nearby the reported loca- tion if they have .the same or adjacent grid coordinates. Location Aids The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will assist the dispatchers in the entry of location information as follows A : Street Address The dispatcher may enter` ' a reported street address as the numerical address, street name Iand street modifier (e.g, avenue, court,- -boulevard, north, south, etc. ) and community. If a partial street , is 'ent'ered ' the=cam- puter will display a numbered list of all streets, includ- ing modifiers and communities in the alphabetical group selected. 'The dispatcher may designate 'the' index number of the street desired and the location entry will be com- pleted. _ As an alternative, the dispatcher may enter the complete address, street name, modifier and community: The computer will verify that the street name is in the data base. It will check for transposition errors for all but the first letter entered, and suggest alternative street names. Street names with multiple modifiers will also be displayed as alternate choices. If the street number entered is out of 'the address range for the street, the computer will display the list of the cross streets of the entered street in geographical order and the address range associated with 'each 'block. The dispatcher can then either enter �a valid street number or choose the nearest cross street. k2 F. =7 • lfhen a valid unique street address has been entered, the computer will display the verified location as the street number, street name, street modifier, community and the two adjacent cross streets. B Intersection An intersection entry consists of the street names and modifiers of two intersecting streets and the community. The dispatcher may enter a one street name in which case the computer will display a numbered list of all its cross streets and their address ranges in geographical order. The dispatcher may then enter the index number associated with the proper cross street to define the intersection. The dispatcher may enter one or more letters of the first street's name and choose the correct street from a computer generated list of streets starting with the same letters. If a dispatcher enters an intersection as two street names , the computer will verify that the streets exist, intersect and form a unique intersection. If these criteria are not met, the computer will display an appropriate list of alternatives from which a dispatcher may choose the correct one. For example the same intersection may occur in two different communities , in which case , both possibilities will be shown. When a valid intersection has been entered, the computer will display the verified location as the two street names with their modifiers and the name of the community. C Building/Place Name A building ;ar . place name .may, be entered if_ it has been, included in the _data base. It maybe desirable to order this . orti.on of .the data base.by type ,of building, or place (e.g. schools , parks, public buildings , etc. ) . The build- ing/place name may be entered by entering at least the first letter of the name. The computer will then display a. numbered list of named buildings and places in the same alphabetical .group, the dispatcher may then enter the index number of the name selected. If a full name is entered, the computer will verify „it in the same manner as a street name is verified. When a valid building or place name has .been entered, the computer will display the verified location as the full building or place name, and its location, including the street address,, interse.ction ,and community. D Area Code An area code may be entered by the dispatcher .to deter- mine a dispatch whenever the actual location cannot be_ determined. 0418 Location/Caller Details A dispatcher may enter any additional information con- cerning the location of the incident as location details. These may include fluor or apartment numbers, front, side or rear of the house, etc. Up to 58 'cha'racters of text may be entered. This information, if entered, will be included in the dispatch message. it may also be 'entered or corrected at a late'r''ti'me using'`either the 'Incident Report or Additional Dispatch displays A dispatcher may also enter information about a caller reporting an incident. This may include a phone number or name. Up to 58 characters of text may be entered. This information, if entered, will be available` to dispatchers as part of the Incident Report or Additional Dispatch dis- plays. Box Alarms The Contra Costa Computer 'Aided `Dispateh" System will a accept non-verbal alarms including those generated from the various telegraph alarm boxes used in the district. When any box alarm is received at the communications center, a dispatches may bring up the Box Alarm and Dispatch Display on a video display unit. The time of the alarm will beq;er.q �ed at the time the display is activated. The box number must be entered by, the dispatcher, when a box number has been entered, the , computer will display the following: box type, box locations ,: area code . map coordinates , - , police r jurisdiction and beat number - water district . - ambulance zone - specific- information for the location (e.g. , hazard) - fumigation at . the location, - nearby hydrants out of service* - nearby street closures* - nearby active incidents* - first and second alarm assignments - first and second alarm moveups - suggested dispatch *Locations will be ,considered .nearby the reported location a.f ,theyhave the sa , me or adjacent grid cc--ordinates . : _ 00420 Type of Incident The dispatcher may enter the type of incident as reported by the caller using the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch display. The type {af incident will be ente' re'd ' as a one or two character code. The incident type will determine the priority levels of the incident. This 'prior'ity level will be used by dispatchers to allocate the Fire- District's resources during periods of high activity If no entry is made, the computer will assume the incident to be a structure fire and generate the appropriate suggested dispatch. The type of incident may be entered or corrected after the dis- patch is made using either the Incident Report or Additional Dispatch display. Typical incident types may include the following : Incident type 'Entry Code'— Trash TR Wi re' Down' WD Wash gas WG House HO Apartment House AP office' Euilding OB Garage : GR ;Shed SH-` 0042 1 Incident Type Entry �Code Commercial Building ; , CB ,, Stalled Elevator. , SE Alarm Bells AB Electrical,, EL Mattress MA Oil Burner OL chimney,. CH Food -on. Stove : The computer will automatically fill in the coded entry word. Other plain _language .entries .may .also be made ,by the operator. 4 . 2 . 2 . 2 Alarm Dispatch The entry ,,of a. valid .Location, or ,area code will enable the dispatcher to make a dispatch, store the alarm infor- mation in queue, for later dispatch, . or.,cancel the incident. For every-,,incident, the computer will develop and display a suggested dispatch based on the area code !,. as determined from the reported location or box numbers the type of incident if entered, and the location ,and, status of units as maintained, )by the computer,.,.. , The units will be dis- tinguished as, to whether they are available in station, on the air, or conditionally available. Units which have moved +� will be shown along with the unit they are replacing. • 00422 9 , i iz � r���' �Y 5 2,,'3aH�ii xb Y c�. ``c 6��3't: tHy. t q a• _.b I t t- a" tJ � The dispatcher may accept the suggested. dispatch-,br modify it. .by;,deleting, adding,or substituting ;units. The dispatcher. may also review thefull assignment area .code card before making. a dispatch, decision: When a dispatch is made, the computer willassignand display a sequential: incident number and record and -,dis- play the time of dispatch. The dispatcher may then broad- cast the alarm message to the assigned .,units, ; Incident Queue Lower priority incidents which lack available units for response may be, stored in an incident queue for dispatch at a later time by the dispatcher. The computer will assign a ,sequential' 'incident number and record the time, it was placed"in-queue. '-A summary of incidents in queue awaiting dispatch will be displayed to the dispatcher upon request. The display will designate the locations and types ofincidents and'�the-times they were received. . The incidents will be placed In-order by their type (priority) ' and for the same type by time- of receipt. The alarm information for any queued incident can be redis- played. and; a :dispatch=made using the Additiona,l' Dispatch display. • 00 Y �i-`i Canceled' Incident Ifithe dispatcher determines, that' no dispatch is 'required, the alarm may be' canceled: Reasons 'to cancel may' include alarms previously reported'-,orrequests 'for cervices not provided by the Fire District. The computer will not assign an incident number toan alarm 'which is cancelled nor will it maintain any record of the``alarm. Additional Dispatch . The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch system will enable dispatchers to review working incidents and make additional dispatchesusing the Additional Dispatch Display. The display may be activated by dispatcher entry of the sequential incident number or the' unit requesting assistance. The display will include: alarm: nformation about the incident. units al,readyt. dispatched to.:,the incident, -., time of dispatch . time of ,unit(s)., arrival time o f, uni.t.(s) returned tocservice -.-area:..code card ,with_lcurrentiunit(s) status -: suggested<,additional;:unit(s) - dispatch : An additional unit dispatch,.may be�;implemented as 'pre- viously described for alarm dispatch. R. 00424 The additional dispatch display will also permit dis- patcher correction of the following incident information: - ' actual location - location 'details -- type of incident - caller's name and telephone number In addition, 'free form 'comments' may be entered by the dispatcher using `the Additional 'Dispa.tchl Display.' These comments may include reports of suspicious or unusual events. The comments will be time dated and will be part of the permanent incident record. Incidents which have previously been queued for, later dispatch may also be dispatched using the Additional Dispatch Display. Since, by definition, ,no units are assigned.,to the incident, the display must be activated using the, incident number. The dispatch may be made as previously described. When a dispatch is made to a queued_ incident, , the incident will be removed from the queue. 4 .2 . 3 Moveups When a dispatch is made to an incident, the ,preplanned moveups on the assignement area code ,card ,will.,also be dis- played. If that incident is the only worki.ng. inci.dent, , the preplanned moveup will generally be the one which the dispatcher iwill choose the make. 00424j 4 .2 .4 Map Coverage Display The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispateh . System will be provided with a Map Coverage Display. The Map Coverage Display will show a schematic outline .of the Fire District, the approximate location of each active incident, each station and whether or not the station is manned. This graphical overview along with the status information displayed on the status video display units .will . enable a dispatcher to efficiently allocate the ,District' s resources. .: Coverage Alert The computer will also display a system alert whenever certain predefined minimum coverage conditions do not exist either as the result of a' dispatch, moveup or status change. These conditions include no units available in two adjacent stations or in certain key stations. When a dispatcher receives the alert, he can use the Coverage Map display to view the coverage and then make any necessary moveups. The moveups may be entered using the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch display, the Box Alarm and Dispatch display or the Additional Dispatch display in conjunction with a dispatch or directly as a command. The entry will consist of the unit being moved up and the unit being replaced. When a moveup is made, the computer will record the time and update all status and summary displays.' 00426 As out of service units become available, moveups can be recalled using the same procedure as for entering the moveups. 4 .2 . 5 Unit Status The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be equipped with status video display units at each operator position. The current status of all first line , reserve and spare fire fighting units will be displayed at these positions. Status may be updated from the working video display unit keyboards at each operator position using special function keys. Contra Costa fire units will be listed on the display as in station or assigned to an incident as indicated on Figure 2, Status Display. Units in staion will be listed as available, condition- ally available or not available. Bright, dim- or, -reverse video features on the video display units will be used to designate unit availability. A unit in station will be designated as available only if a crew or, in come cases, a driver is also available. A unit in station will be con- ditionally available if a crew is only partially available. A unit in station will be out of service if a crew is not available. A letter code will define the reason the unit in station is out of service. An asterick will designate units on the air. w U 01ON r14 O1 H ww Awa3 wuU riwQ+ HH oCgWRCr� U ix r' a 00 of rn W w � W r-4 r a t r- p t0 r-t W N W U ro � r-1 k x N �, t "o r-1 �' x � � tok to3 W WE-+ a r1Wa x Ln �r r-i t Ln 4 r-I ro U1 W3 WP � 4 9C �S A E+ � Wa+ r+ W WHaW x W c.7 ro � ro rt R, NN k k J t N N ri e-i 1= x k x N 4U) r-IWWaH k � ?xC ?C ?kCkk s~ kkxxx ro � ro W WHH r-iWa �N42811 • Units assigned to incidents will be separately listed on the unit status display. Units at incidents will also be designated 'as conditionally available when servicing low priority incidents. Status Updates The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will enable operator update of status from the working video display unit keyboards . As an option mobile status units may be added to the basic system. Manual status keeping will be facilitated by the use of special function keys on the keyboards . These keys will enable back-up status maintenance if the optional mobile status system is used. Unit status conditions will include, at a minimum, the following; - respondingto an 'incident - arrived at the scene available at the scene' - - moving-up a out of service conditionally available - available in station available on the air • 0049,44 All manual status changes will be time dated and recorded by the computer. In addition, all operator unit status, incident and fire coverage displays (map) will be updated. 4 .2 .6 Mutual Aid Status A separate status display will be available under key- board control at each dispatcher status video display unit for all mutual aid fire units operating in the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District., A pre-fix will indicate the home district of the unit. The status of the unit will include the incident number, and whether it is available, conditionally available or out of service. 4 . 2 . 7 Incident Status The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will provide both summary and detailed incident displays to the dispatcher upon keyboard command on the working video display units. The Summary display, will list all active incidents in their order of occurrence. This will include incidents in queue awaiting assignment. The incident summary will include all pertinent details about each incident including the incident number, reported location, incident type, alarm area, grid co-ordinates, units assigned and. current incident status. Incident status will be listed .as reported, dis- patched, working or closed._; The Report display will consist of all known transactions . about: an individual incident., This will include the reported location,;'.actual- location,, ',caller name :and Aelephone;. location details (i.e. apartment number-,;-floor,;-'etc. ) ,alairm area, box number, ,-and incident. number. - ;In additionthe report will con- tain the time of alarm and time of response, arrival and re- lease for each unit ,assi,gned or reassigned:. t-o the incident. The incident.,repo,rt.;may;,be ,updated,.from 4the- operator keyboards as ,additional"information becomes; available from the scene. Unit status changes will .also be recorded. The incident report will be maintained as an active display until: .the incident ,has, I been completed. , It may then be printed. onthelog printer and recorded on thediskette s.tora,ge ,unit upon completion or; periodically asprequired - y; t he fire district. , An .inci.dent will remain active,even if: units are re- assigned to incidents of a higher priority. The unit reassignment::times will be. noted ,,on.,the-_display. • 00431 a Jt e � •� n l _ •f. r _ v 4 . 2.. 8 System.-Alerts • The � Contra Costa Computer' Aided 'D spatch System will alert dispatchers to situations which may require immediate attention. -System alerts will include : failure:'of,` a unit to're'sporid tb `a dispatch `message within thirty (30) seconds failure of a unit to respond to a move-up request within thirty (30) seconds loss of fire coverage within the district - ,an incident 'has been 'active more, than eight hours , 'dispatcher message need`s'`attention ' - equipment 'failure - input errors An alert,will 'take the form of an audio signal and a flashing display of a code' on the top line, of the working (video:display units indicating the nature of' the alert. The dispatcher must acknowledge the alert before the 'full''alert message is displayed. This will prevent interruption of a dispatcher while performing other important functions . If more than one alert has' been generated, the alert messages will be displayed in the order in which they were generated. Once an alert is acknowledged by a dispatcher, the audio signal is silenced and the alert code cleared from the top line of all video display units. 00432 9q l Vt The computer will also alert dispatchers to entry errors as they are made. These alerts differ from those described above in that only the dispatcher making the entry is alerted. There is no alert code nor acceptance procedure required. The alert will be a flashing display of the incorrect entry and an explanation of the error. The dispatcher may then correct the error and proceed with the dispatch . Individual dispatcher error messages may include: unit not available, unknown building name, etc. 4 .2 .9 Hydrant Status A list of all hydrants out of service will be maintained by the computer and will be available to dispatchers on their working video display units as a Hydrant Status Dis- play. For each hydrant out of service, the display will show the location of the hydrant, map co-ordinate, and the time and date that it was put out of service. The hydrant out of service location will be identified as a special condition during an alarm dispatch when in the same or adjacent grid co-ordinates. Authorized users may enter, change or delete hydrants out of service from the working display keyboards. 00433 4 . 2 . 10 Closed Streets Display A list of all streets closed will be maintained by the computer as a Closed Streets display. The display will list each closed street in alphabetical order. The listing will include the street name, address range, and beginning and ending cross streets. In addition the time and date of the closing will be listed, along with the map grid co- ordinate or co--ordinates of the street. The closed street will be identified during an alarm dispatch as a special condition when in the same or adjacent grid co-ordinates. Authorized users may enter, change or delete closed streets using the working video display unit keyboard. 4 .2 .11 Fumigation Display A list of locations undergoing fumigation will be main- tained by the computer as a Fumigation Location display. The display will list each location by street address, map grid co-ordinate, and the date and time of the entry. The fumigation location address will be identified during an alarm dispatch as a special condition when at the same location as the reoorted location. { 00434 • Authorizedusers- may enter; change',or= delete ' fumigation locations from the display from •the working' videoldisplay unit keyboards. 4 .2 .12 . , Record Keeping:; 'The Contra; Costa 'Computer lAided"'Dispatch'`System will maintain ;complete ands accurate�'records ''6f'�f re 'distri'ct activities. These, recorde`�',AII include a :-printe'd 'chrono- logical `log'of 'all�'eventsit`printed, incident,"reports"`a'nd incident reports stored in computer readable',formJon�the diskette unit. The diskettes are industry standard compatible and will permit further processing of the incident data into comprehensive management reports using other computers . The incident records will as 'a minimum include the ,following' information - .times' of alarm incident iiumbers - dispatches , - uni't'•status :changes: - key personnel changes - hydrant status changes - fumigationi}location- status 'changes _messages`.'and``acknowledgements ' - alert messages • - user identification 0043 oo `t'w` 2�t. s All -events. will be logged or recorded with, the date and time to the second. 4 . 2 . 13 Status Log The computer will automatically print, a ,summary:,of all . unit status- changesf atfifteen; (15) ;minute -intervals. up to ten (l0). =;changes ,, in an individual unit status , may _ be printed. ,, This printed record, will serve as .a backup to ; enable reconstruction of ;eventsrshould; a computer inter- ruption, occur. In addition, a dispatcher may cause the contents , of a working display to be printed upon request. 4 . 2 . 14 Data . Base 14odification The computer will enable geographic data base modi- fications to be performed by authorized users. Changes may be made off line to enable verification. ,._Streets may be added, changed or deleted. Specific. location information may be filed for display as, a specialcondition alert during an alarm dispatch. Data base changes may be performed by fire -district personnel in a routine ,manner. , ,,All,;changes.:will be recorded, along with the date and time. _ 0035 4 .2 .15 Messages The' Contra Costa 'Computer Aided Dispatch System will enable dispatchers and other users to send and receive messages. ' P're- formattedor free "form text may -be ;prepared usin the ' rk n `' video 'di's' iia units'' y . � ., Ing g p yari'd ke boards.' Messages may be selectively or generally' addressed. Acknowledgements 'may :be ' requested'11 and to"gged:` A message waiting `a'16'rt wiifactivate oh''the `'to'p "bine of a working video display when an addressed user logs on. When the user accepts the message, the message waiting alert will be cleared and the message text displayed. The user may signify acknowledgement, if required, which will be logged with the date and time. A user may review the message file upon keyboard command, including acknowledgements. Messages may be purged after a pre-determined time. 4 . 2 . 16 Quick Reference File Permanent operating procedure reference files may be maintained by the computer and displayed on request. These Files may be quickly referenced by the system users , who may page using a working video display unit keyboard controls. Reference displays will be prepared, entered, changed or deleted by fire district personnel. .. � f 004W 4 . 2 . 17 Training Mode Contra Costa trainees . may utilize aspects - of the computer aided dispatch system to , ain ,famil_iarity .wi,th ,,the, system operation. Trainees ,will .be , assigned an ,access ,level ,which will ,prevent them . from makingdispatches,,_,changing unit status or making modifications .to . the data .base , or :programs . _ p, e < ► „use,,the,,location Trainees may ,de�ermine re orted locations , aids and review unit and incident status. They may also initiate _and acknowledge messages. � � 00438 • 4 . 3 System Options This section describes system hardware and software enhancements for the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System. r � r t 00Q39 t ! 4 . 4 . 3 .1 Mobile Status System - Option A Eagle Signal will integrate into the proposed Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System, a mobile status reporting subsystem. The mobile status units will transmit digital status messages and vehicle identification for input to the system status displays. The subsystem will include all hardware, software documentation and training required for a satisfactory operation. 4 . 3 .1.1 Hardware The mobile status subsystem will include the following hardware: Quantity Description 60 Mobile Status Terminals w/mounting hardware 1 Base Encoder/Decoder 1 Computer Interface Unit The mobile status subsystem will be furnished by Coded Communications, Inc. , of San Marcos , California. The operation of the Coded Communication system is described herein. Installation of the vehicle units will be by Contra Costa Fire District. ;f rc � � titi � ',� �yy}�,.�" -v r� �a ,2,` L U >' ' •., r i 1yT �'... rr���,S ,+ o- r�.�� i ��� • 4 . 3. 1. 2 Operation Vehicle crews may notify the ;computer of .status changes using the mobile status terminals. A status change is generated,.by: depressing the ,appropriate :message button on the terminal.] The unit :will, gc:n(.rate is -digital. message and -transmit •it ' using the vehicle Rr transiever. The digital signal will be decoded .at the fire alarm center and be input;.to the.,computer. The computer, will:.:generate an acknowledgment message whi�ch =mUL be :transmitted'.back to the vehicle mobile. status' terminal. . The following status: messages. may be transmittedfrom the mobile terminals: * responding :to an incident * arrived at the scene * available 'at scene * moving , up * ,out: of service. * conditionally available * available -on ; air ; * available _in °quarters If a unit .changestits status, to .out of service or: icondi- tionally-:available, it may-also :transmit the reason for its new status .-.usingthe,rprecoded ,messages. 000 tiK l� + d �/. t 4Ftip t�t„�tc��t �jS�eS��� �'xe h +� tJ r.�"y�`;�5��1 a��f � �F St.i' f S i 4 •� x;.w1 ,: i>> �t�f,�y '•P^1L' �f i9 q.,.. ".' '? ,,{ �� s !J d��. -�a ''�°?t M +SS !• - i i Y ` r {�r.. When a status change is received by the computer, it , will check to determine if ,the status change is :a consistent transition (e.g. , a responding unit must have been pre- viously dispatched) .s xfnan inconsistent change . is . entered, the computer will {display the unit in :a flashing mode' on the status video display units and display a system alert on the top line of the working video display units. , A dispatcher can verify the .correctness of the change and then either accept or reject it by making an appropriate entry on his keyboard. If the change is consistezit, the com- puter will update the status displays , incident displays and other files in the same fashion as when performed by a dis- patcher. The dispatcher will still be able to enter changes using the manual procedures described in the basic system. The computer aided dispatch system will ,generate system alerts if certain status changes do not occur after an action is taken. If all dispatched units do not change their status to RESPONDING within a specified time (e.g. 15 seconds) of being dispatched, the computer will generate a system alert message and display it on the top line of all working video displays . The alert message, when acknowledged by a dispatcher, will shoal the incident number and location, time of dispatch, the units responding .and the _units which have not yet changed their status to responding. The dis- patcher may then determine the cause of the problem and take appropriate action. A similar alert will be generated if a unit does not respond to a moveup. a4J9 y1 4 . 3 .2 Mobile 'Status System Stand Alohe - Option B The mobile status system described in option A may be designed'to operate independently of the computer aided dis- patch system in the event of a malfunction. This will enable continued vehicle anddispatch status reporting during the period of interruption. The stand alone option will also update the computer aided dispatch system at the time of restoral. The stand alone mobile status system will consist of the following hardware : Quantity Description 60 Mobile status terminals w/mounting hardware 1 Base encoder 1 Microprocessor 1 Video display unit/keyboard 1 Monitor video display units . 1 Computer interface unit System Operation The mobile status reporting system will operate as des- cribed in option A. Status messages received from vehicles will be decoded and displayed on the dispatcher status video displays. Dispatcher entries made at the working video display unit keyboards , using procedures similar to • those described for the basic computer aided dispatch system, will update the status video display units . �4 � } � ii,' i ,:4 t .x ', r r 1 w.Z t T t t.z} k;A���z.�,kp �f} y, r i 1 i f )Yz `°'Y t!�,a l f-'t _`YE• ''�r154 °'�� :�� ;z"?' F.A>.t}' �. wz:i.ZE�Jt,.„ t✓ Lt s. '13 _ Sk.,F.-�1 .. _ _asr' .5.,. ..r.i. _ During a computer system malfunction, mobile status p g •.. . , tat reports will no longer continue to update the s us video displays at the dispatcher postions. However, , dispatcher entries and updates may be made at the single keyboard associated with the mobile status video display unit _pro- vided with this option. I 4 . 3 . 3 ' Radio- Box Interface Option The radio box interface 'is offered as an option ' to the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System. It will enable radio box alarms and tests of the radio box system to be input to the system computer. The interface will be manu- factured by Eagle Signal Corporation. The radio box interface will enable receipt of radio call box alarms in the form of a system alert message. When a radio box alarm is received, the box number and message number will be displayed in a flashing mode on the top line of all working video display units. When this occurs , a dispatcher may activate the Box Alarm display by depress- ing the BOX function key. The dispatcher will then depress the ACCEPT function key and enter the box number. The com- puter will clear the box number and message code from the top line of all working video displays. The box location, and a suggested assignment will be displayed. The alarm will then be dispatched as previously described. The existing radio box system is designed so that each box in the system sends a test signal to the communications system once every day. When a test signal is received, the computer will recognize it as such and not treat the signal as an alarm. Instead it will maintain a checklist of boxes which have tested successfully. At the end of each day, the 90,445 x 4 computer will print a list of boxes from which it,has :not received- a ;test, signal ,during,that ;day , on , the--log ;printer. ... .;a. ., :-(.' 1!1?t. .,,,.� ..?IS - , '.� f J .� ..c-_, .�....! i, _. '.1�;�• ' f..(, ..,. X11 i1 � . Ell 4 . 3 . 4 Station Printer,:System Option • The Contra Costa Computer Aided. Dispatch 'System fmay, as an option, be equipped 'with -a Station Printer 'System'. The system :will 'consist -of fire,,,Ifs:tation printers , leased 'tele- phone lines, modems and controllers) and �alll necessary 'soft- ware to receive and confirm dispatch and administrative messages. The system will enable messages''to be? transmitted on a selective'. or_;iall >call .basis,., ;The! system will' also per- addition .of station printers>= lrat other county 'locations , the 911 center, : or police.. communication centers . The .station printers will-be- designed to be retrofitted with unit status controls and .displays. The addition of video display units. to the printer controllers is also possible. 4 . 3 .4 .1 Hardware The station printer system will consist of the following hardware: Quantity Description ,Model 19 Hardcopy .Printer. , - Eagle' Sisjnal HDP 110-1 19 Station Modem/Controller. Eagle Signal HDP 110-2 19 Communications Center Eagle Signal HDP 110-3 Modem 1 Computer Interface 1 0 041 1 n�i'+= r r, ,? 14j '�^�(jlf � I �' i t Y i S `S } Jt `• ,y ;,I In v „S � .t' ��Y�l�� _ -.. hn{..iso . •i ' ' } .bbl ,_ L 1 r ,. . .. '7.�j The station printers wiUh be designed to operate on a standard voice grade circuit with a frequency response of • 300 to 3000 Hertz. The printer/controller units are addressable and maybe arranged for multiple drop 'on a single circuit if this is desired. Station Printer The station printer:.will be, a model 110` Okidata or equivalent. The printer-is an impact dot matrix type-, capable of producing multiple copies on standard roll paper. Data is printed on a line by line basis. Each line is eighty (60) characters in length. Lines are printed at up to sixty (60) lines per minute. The printer will be equipped with a single operator acknowledge key. The printer is of rugged construction and will be housed in an enclosure with its own logic control unit. 115 VAC power will be required The printers will be supplied for desk top mounting. Station Modem/Controller The station modem/controller unit will provide a standard FSK interface to the communications line. The logic portion will perform data error checks and respond to line polling. • 00 Communications;;will.,be two way bi--synchronous' at 1200 baud r with, a 150 'baud- reply: - T,he: logic output may be expanded to pro vide other station control and display functions, such as indi- vidual unit ..status , reports ,. station audible signals, etc . Communications Center Modems The communications center modem provides a standard RS232 interface , to the ,computer., :It .will receive !signals from the station.-printer.: , A modem will be provided -far each station communications line Computer Interface Unit The computer will send and receive data from the station printer system using a standard asynchronous line multiplex unit. System Operation The station printer: Messages maybe transmittedwith an acknowledgement required.' In this case, the - printer- acknowledge� key 'will be illuminated for more-defined'period 'of time. ' `If operator acknowledgemerit`'is riot made, � a �systemffalert °will "n'o'tify the dispatcher. Messages received in station for units on the air, or assigned, will not regui:re: an''acknowledgement. :The .:stationprinter*jsystem�=wl`l� provide 'dat'a error checks ,; .and in the :event of, an 'error detection; will' pause the line of data to be retransmitted.' ` ' Should, ari `'error be detected after the retransmission, a system alert will notify the dispatcher. , All printers .will be polled frequently asla communications line check. Should a polled station printer/controller not respond, a system alert message will notify the dispatcher. The: station printer. system .is designed= to' be'-,-In confor- mance with the. standards set forthby ' t_16 National` Fire Protection Association for� Public fire Commun'ications .' 00450 4 . 3 .5 Uninterruptable Power Supply Option_... • Eagle Signal Corporation 'stron 1' ',recommends the inclu- sion sion o f an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) for the Contra Costa Computer Aided nispatch System. TheUPSwill provide continuous power and be isolated from utility line surges and spikes. A line surge in the alternating current utility line or the interruption of power to the computer or disk for even a fraction of a second may cause a system failure. A 7.5 UPS system is proposed. It will have sufficient power for all computer aided dispatch system components located at the communications center. It will consist of a rectifier system whicjt transforms AC source power to DC power, a battery charger, a set of batteries and an inverter which produces uninterruptable 120V, 6011Z AC load power. The batteries will have sufficient capacity to operate the computer aided dispatch system for ten (10) minutes during which time the Fire District's backup generator can be activated. The UPS system will be a TUC Inc. Model HSG7.5KU. • 00 S 1 "K31yR.�, r,. 4 . 3 . 6 Magnetic Tape Unit Option , A magnetic; tape_ unit .Jis oYffered ,as ran .option. It ' would • replace the floppy; dish. as the, r„edium, for::logging events in computer,,readible form.,,-_ The, unit would be_,a.•:pata,,General Model .6021 r 1:. t OF. • 4 . 3 . 7 Dual Disk Option Eagle Signal Corporation recommends that a second disk unit be added to the basic computer aided dispatch system. The second disk unit will 'be identical to the one included in the basic system design and will be used as a backup. It will contain the same files. All computer entries will be written on both disks. If the computer should be unable to read data from one disk, it will automatically go to the second ,disk to obtain the data. This will .reduce. the ,possi- bility of system downtime due to disk errors or„routine maintenance. A dual disk system will also simplify the generation and updating of the data base. The back-up disk unit will be a Data General Model 6050 10 megabyte cartridge disk drive . A specification for this unit is provided in the appendix. • o it�� Z3 4 . 3 . 8 Statistical Analysis Reports Option An option is offered to provide statistical analysis reports . Software will be provided to generate the print the following monthly reports.: * General statistical summary * Summary of incidents by area code * Summary of incidents by activity code * area'-code s:'r .�,, :� :�'. Summa of, response .times ,of units - to .s ecific These' reports wkl'l 'be ri-iit'ed' oris 'c6inman.id' on t . p p li"e 'log Printer. The precise format and content of these ' reportswill be developed in conjunction with the Fire bistrict. � ,�' �� 0045•1 4 Fire Personnel Recall File Option • R fire personnel recall file- option is offered. It would provide a multiple page display containing the name , rank , phone number and the priority for.. recall for. Fire District personnel. The display will be available , on• the working video display . units . Paging will be usedto display various portions of the file. Personnel information may be.,entered , ,changed or. deleted using the workinq video display ,unit. keyboard. 4 . 3 . 14 Dual Computer Option The Contra Costa' Computer Aided Dispatch System can be provided in a dual computer configuration. The two computers would be identical, with the second' one;'serving 'as a cold backup should the 'first' either fail or be''down' ' for routine maintenance. Operationally, the system would function as described for the basic system. However,' sh ould, the first computer fail, the second computer would be started up and take over all `computer aided dispatch `system 'functions. The start up procedure will take about B minutes and could be performed by a trained dispatcher or technician. During normal operation of the computer aided dispatch system, the second computer could be used to perform other functions (e .g. develop management reports , maintain and update of Fire District records , etc. ) 00456 ! 4 . 3 . 11 Expanded Training Capabilities Option • Expanded dispatcher training facilities are offered as an option. The expanded facility will enable trainees to completely exercise all aspects of the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System , ,The simulation of incidents would include dispatching units; making. status !changes , making moveups, etc. The results of; the actions would appear only on the working ,vicleo display unit and would not interfere with the real operation of the communications center. The Expanded Training Capabilities Option will require software to be developed to set up temporary trainee data files in the computer and to provide the logic to distin- guish between dispatcher entries and trainee entries , so that the correct files and displays are updated. 0045TI r r # zk 4 . 4 Acceptance Test Procedure • Eagle Signal Corporation will assemble and fully test the Contra 'Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System-at' its facility in Austin, Texas, before installing''it 'in the Fire District. It is ' recommended that alrepresentative of the fire District visit the plant to inspect and test all functions at this time and make' a preliminary acceptance. The system will then be installed in- Contra-'Costa,'where it will again be fully exercisedSby the Fire District. ;Final acceptance will occur when: 1. All proposed hardware has been properly installed. 2. All displays and entries function as described in the system description. 3. If, implemented, the mobile status system functions as specified. 4 . If implemented, the station printer 'system functions as specified 5. If implemented, the radio box interface functions as specified G . Training has been provided to Fire District personnel 7. Documentation has been provided 8. The system successfully operates for a period of 30 days. Upon contract award, a detailed system description will be developed by Eagle Signal. When approved by the Fire District, the system description will provide the basis for .the development of a mutually agreeable set of detailed a(V } e tests. The system will be required to pass these tests as a condition of its acceptance. 0 14 4 . 5 Reliability and Back-up The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be designed to be highly reliable in keeping with its 24 hour, 7 day a week mission. off the shelf computer hardware will r be used from reputable,well-known manufacturers with support facilities nearby to the communication center. Each working video display unit will be fully independent from the other terminals. Any video display unit may be ,used to perform all system functions. Software and data base protection will be established through the use of the log on/log off procedures and pre- assigned levels of operator access. Display formats will be protected so that data may only be entered in designated fields. Error messages will guide users to proper system usage. Diagnostic programs will help to pinpoint the cause of equipment or software failures. Continuous system operation may be further assured through the use of the recommended uninterruptible power supply. ;leadless interrupts due to power failures or generator tests are avoided to assure orderly data processing. Shut downs, should they occur, are normally detected in time by the computer so that programs may be placed in protected areas of memory. Restarts are facilitated through auto- matic program reloading. i 00459 -f 4 . 5 . 1 Ianual Operations Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will support a manual back-up operation. Should a shut doWil of the computer become necessary , pre-planned manual operations will enable the alarm receipt and dispatch process to con- tinue in an efficient fashion. The manual operation will consist of documented pro- cedures similar to those now performed by the dispatchers . Alarms will be received using the existing telephone system which is not dependent on the computer. Dispatch assignments may be made using a hardcopy form of the geographic data base on file at each dispatch position. The hardcapy data base will consist of all required assign- ment and street indexes in card format. The manual data base may be kept up to date by the computer as changes are made from time to time. unit status will be determined from the printer log record. Dispatchers will be able to reconstruct current incidents and to continue operations on a manual basis . Procedures to update the computer incident files upon restart of computer operation will also be provided as part of the system documentation. These procedures will enable 0 -0460 h operator entry of incident transactions during the period • of interruption to keep the report files up to date. Implementation of the stand alone mobile status option and/or the back-up computer option will further enhance system reliability. 4 . 6 Documentation Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be supplied with full documentation ,to enable satisfactory operation. The documentation will include both hardware and soft%.fare technical descriptions in operators manuals and maintenance manuals . The operator ' s manual will outline computer aided and manual dispatching procedures. The manual will include dis- patcher aids to help understand and utilize the special function keys and system commands and will provide examples of various functions for alarm receipt, dispatch, status maintenance and record updates . The manual will also des- cribe how to recognize problems and the steps necessary to restart the system. The maintenance manual will include the hardware technical descriptions and will provide the necessary procedures for first line maintenance . Routine maintenance procedures will be described and schedules suggested. �� . 0 P Technical descriptions will be provided for each hard- ware component and will include the manufacturer' s recommended maintenance and repair procedures. Software descriptions will outline the steps required for future program modifi- cations and will contain flow charts and program descriptions . 4 .7 Training The Contra' Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System proposed k by Eagle �Signal 'w'ill include training for operators and first line maintenance personnel. Training for operators will include formal classroom instruction and hands-on operation prior to system cutover. The operator' s manual will serve as the basis for the train- ing. Formal training sessions should normally be completed within eight (8) hours per watch. Three (3) sessions will be held. Operator hands-on experience may be gained during watches in parallel with manual dispatch operation. Parallel oper- ation may continue for several weeks if necessary. Simulated problems and exercises will be supplied which will enable operator proficiency to be developed naturally and without pressure under Fire District leadership. 0,0462 II Maintenance training will include three eight {8}`hour sessions of formal classroom training. 'In addition, main- tenance technicians will be invited to participate in the system instal:3:ation, check--out and' cutover to achieve practical experience Mainten`anc'e technicians will,"also be introduced to contract "field equipment service` personnel during their training 'to establish procedures' to implement outside warranty''and 'contract post warranty setvi:ces.' 4 . 8 Warranty Eagle Signal will arrange to furnish and install a com- pletely operaticnal 'Computer Aided Dispatch system as agreed upon under contract with the Contra Costa Fire Protection District. Eagle Signal will agree to warrant all items in the system, including the software, 'to be free from 'defects when used for 'their intended purpose'. Any `item 'found to be defective within one year of the 'acceptance date and not to exceed eighteen (18) months from delivery date of the system will be corrected 'or' replaced as required`.` The warranty `will not include -equi pti ent, software or data base material which has been subject to misuse, omission, `negligence or accident, ' when' such action was` by 'anyone other than Eagle':Signal or -its representatives'. t 1� 00463 •b ..i" ..., 1. .t. . ,. -•1 _�� .fid.:'Y' „, .__ ...,., ,.,rx ,-.... .� } } .�.` �. +}.�7 ... ... >«i� 4 . 9 Spare Parts The basic Contra Costa ,Computer Aided Dispatch ,System will consist of standard -off the .shelf hardware. _.;The hard- ware will incl.ude ,a mini-computer; and computer peripherals . A ;maintenance contract, wi.11 be ,in force with the computer manufacturer during the ,warranty period. The contract is for on call service for, all remedial and preventative maintenance requirements includinq :parts, jabor .and, travel. it is recommended that Contra Costa continue the maintenance agreement after the warranty period. Eagle Signal recommends that Contra Costa purchase one additional video display unit as a spare back--up, Sure Parts-Options The mobile status system option A will ,require the following spare parts: Quantity Description Model 1 Kit Mobile Status Report Unit Spares SPK-M/ED/IOU-1 1 Set Encoder/Decoder Spare Card SC2404 , The mobile status system option B .will require as an alternative to the above the following spare parts : Quantity Description Model 1 Kit Mobile Status Unit Spares SPK-M/ED/IOU-1 1 teStatus Controller Spare Card SC2402 The station printer system option will require the following spare parts: Quantity Descries Model 1 - Station Controller/Modem HDP-110-2 1 Printer HDP-11.0-1 1Central office Modem HDP-110-3 The computer aided dispatch system and selected hard- ware options will be furnished with an initial set of spare lamps, fuses, paper, and diskettes. v;. r di_ - Y '•- 'x7- `fir w • V Work Plan and Schedule The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be designed and implemented under the specific direction of a project engineer. All project tasks are defined and sche- duled using the Critical Path Method based on the require- ments of the Fire District. The CPM preliminary schedules are included in this section. Schedules included are a r;. Master Schedule, Master Schedule Barchart, Critical Path Schedule and a Milestone Schedule. 00466 •'''' .. cio r,.'Aa cl f)rt' tIrv, Q 1. ,1 sN S C C C O G J c t rr'^ n e..c•'1 r .. .G .0 41, .n .0 .r U tr,Wr t N N N V C L:N •.• 1 J m 'L n cr L'LH cf'n).+'c•L.NL.L.N v C C N•-- 1 L r tr -. J C v G•C C c C C :, c r- C.7 a t T t T V L', M':Z•�-'3•t!, _i. X C C m C V. c T M t A rt, Lt,¢a r I cm rr 3 . . •.. i tr'. a 4 2 r . - .. 'tr.0'cT'G-(n cr tp,-'L V V C: 2 C r) 2 c U "t'V.C 1 r" �, .•< t s - - 7 c c > a c c Y c r R• 1 n, 'cr V V.m M'rn(!`.'m 71�" -+ C s C m Y c -•r 1 X, S w 'L a .••i c-f w b 4 m W a rr -r a— m.mM ._ .'s:.: w H 3 '�'x'A it r� b r w l a s r I M I ' CC ' .tnmZ 3: > x c r c a :r,rn m t o V .. . . • a YM7L). "C mom•.cnm r7 xc- rm .^.. CO 1 r'1 r .. . . • r9 l. �..n rr .m rr C Il: G m 1 w O n r) U -A:`,° a w O `C ;r x 'n C.-• m -. a BCH mml"1•m m b MOm "c rF 'L` � t-M rn2mc V < Cr7 ? xnmc2. z (A i M m rr M arwr -+XrMr Z1M - mr ; Zm - C .^ r. O x Y'U �Crc =+ s+-•r C-+_w S i R Oaw' Glmrrm .Lc0 1 O mzz - coc 1R: w I-.C` In m to m x:Rt I to H a m v m ; cr I n. m t•+O -1 x 2 --1 m m r) i cn c H :c o A ► M I V t w C m m H I A m m m_ m z 1 rr. - r � 1 t c c c c a o c c o a c o c a c c a c c o I m - .. I z ' N ru N N r V ti: 4` C C N N I O b ✓ OOO ONC CCM .� 00CCOtr.�-•• O t ccl ..- 1 Z-i ... 1 rn W Uv .CV L.14 r II c C c ... C"+ c c 0 cc V• cr,tf W cc �ca I > r1 I I x U7 T t t: W W N N 3 .: a X a? V 1 H M 4 ' NNN NM,1TN i w b i I- (n V .0 ,C ;7^NN b t WNN .0 .DNN NNW I T• L r- 41 :.I S ,C .n .[r .n Ss .0 z P at a.(E x Cc W O a m 1 to b C � m z } 1 T H C Att'L. NN.•-N-- C .'• .0 r%,z M•x v 1 V N ' NN rV rL A N M1 NN W I rb x . V it t C P W Y•'• •• U L N L: .' •^' N? ••• 1 "' x m M1 M V -d V V '+1 v V -.J - V V v V v V V V•.. V I V K C V t So.n .n :C ,n z cr cc a O: .r.rr .n a ,2 x 1 ]: r ,• A tnN • —NNN7 ex V . lr N N W N M N N N .1. NL. r. •••. U V :t fl' 7`N M1 C t: L,W.� 3 C .r c N O .-•tw 1 L.r- < V r c r a' .n na n c r !F nim ramrr a•c, 1 . O`'fr :f 3t'•tw W N rL •r V N N Z On V 1 ^. \ . \ \ \ \.\ \ \ \ \ \ ! 'n r . N N N N.L L N N N N N N to 1 •-+ b lr ' LP C Z V rL4 -.LiN N V✓+-' ! _ -- \ V '1 .4 V V 1 V v C • •!? .0 .L •n .;(7 .r .L) .L .r.c .0 L i .D 'r ..0 .n cr aL a: i S T• m C) rnmR•R,R' mmmTt^Irrmm mr) rnm.rnm ! r ' �I L Y L• i- a > Y A 7• 'ri Y 6 L• r ,' A A A T• 1 rl' C7+::G-1ccC': C v,c C1 v.GS G'} 1 ti +-• 8't(r-jJ s> �"yi,.J� f�TMa S.• � `. r -,.,t : `.n ,d?a C, ti"L{y:'-,:v�:rtM1"y!t, -:•a, .r [»'�: �r Y- :'1:,�«! �. ( ;a t I yRW'y\Yr• r yr .�..e4�i'�{!" .� :{.. _ t- '1 Uf•' "�` '�$,GI e'._ .'*3t t.. use ,a} ,yp,... ,� . :Ttiri\ ;"t .r" .?.#a'-... �:�;r�' 5+..':.-_,. ;•h f4�,4j'•� ..k`•�F.. 'k '•::1'�;(ir, - „'�i`vt. �I..1..)a .}.. .�"��. 1 - r qy - a S } a {j°r x•r R•, •n , , ..., r_ ... .. .. ,. Irl ....:.. _ t r4 - ._,..r .�. »r', .r.: �.O•.D.0.Ll :;D.NYW„tJlw.q:N:N'N.. `.;f•. . .. C'^ 'N •.r r O'G O ti R:' O'y IRA »tth cr c rM s , • aGcc'cc•oacr.'c .:`<,,�,c'c ..co ' .• is-i: ., , _� _ ,i 41 M di '' .J _ :.. .y, - 4^ n .T. A , >'..: c.c-.o;daaOr.O,W.WW.eNNNulItLwM1i,rr LX.a-W Lr P-r o U 11:.-r L.N r c c c.. N r n`w'x .. \ : t. A S C C cy G C O*f-- CSC 6 c�G C c c c. a n c v n C w` J. •, i'.: �Yr,M;.-i.Ma s-.M'$7tn 3 :u C O n C tr:0 'C M K 'J.-t-4 stn{l: V. C t/. C rl crc v: tr- c tntrCAcu.tntn 'vtntncs.cnx0W TCA znz! 47, ' .K•=i..a'.T..�..♦..K_z.o C V b v c L )•G r -• 1•1 Y Cl v X A.'n (A4+vl,mH NW m,?4 Tt-•4TCMC -4Tn to-' -•T > -4-4-4x T-4=T M-4 aG 'ro a Mn--. S- M Im m 3- comms• frM a Z-. : roc • mrr,M c-nc_ c m F .. a \i �3 ia;�"�-•.$,y,,�'.A b b M -4 '+' "^ > r z C:: (" . .0'C} .tr',tr..x X I- :u C m C r Z m rn z m .. .. •• ,:C.. ,.".: ,m RI fn m n z 4,-„4:m c C c c c • n,n:tni.0.3•'21-.:••+C x S -n CMV.'Cn C K .'. t .. •rn,m,-4'Dla,-t'Z m m n m m D"am n -t ro=ro,a.,vs me"tr�on zz}nm<?: Xcr x i c cn .. .. -t-•rZ C`W.Gf D,.•t m ;m Rt O r. <m rr,M-4 H n Z M .. + m.D.r,-4 r:-4'x,r H r T M Z x -^4 m r 2 ro m '•t;c t C =, (A.2 C r K-4 a♦•t r C-4-4? H M n :. . r .. 'n•-4, •.O•a -4•; 'O VMM mcc ro M n-4.., t . m•M-iD•-4 H! x-I0 m2mxocG nMM ; ox-.HC.- mm to) xrrxzm rno . . . -4:7_>m o 2,. 2 ro m z v to 7•M am ., ., N- •2 o -4 AJ O x7 n n • y M m -• o v: nm rnmmmmmmmn47+rnmmr.rrmmm v v a -4 -•:': 0000: G4nG)GI G10 OO CGI GI CG7G7 GSo K -• m m t • v V MHHHMM MMM.M HH HH HMMn Mr ' i • • • • • • . • • . • . • • . • • . ' Q•.MH>-H a-MMN W H.M MM MM M HF+ro HiT ' Q'..M HMHM.HMHMM.H.HMH ht TMtJ n ' y •• • a • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • • n to x ro N. P •.M,M •-IH•-,.-HMHN A HHH.M X % nx �C HQ• N D C . } � W • • • i • • i f f • ♦ • X X X X n\ W n N H r�.+M H H W H•-M M W M M M x Y. % x Z �+ H+� = Cr Y t • s • '• • • • { s • X x x X T�. G ' .. ♦ .• • � .• ♦ • • • • X x x x t \ N M W_ • • t y t • • • : • ♦ 'X X x x -C r. N 4T. w tr H",H F••y H.h+.H M M H M H X X % % n"., r O• D tr . ' - , . . , .: '• i i 'i i .♦ t '� s • • •xXXxn�. 4 n 'r x, 1 • • • i . • • • • • • 'x X x X ro♦ S C c No H M M M t•'t M H x X X x T\ H r , .Z' 7'• .. G`H H f�.,H-H H F M M H M M M X X X X n�•'. M Q' C W .• ♦ • ♦ • r • • • • • x X X r ro 1 D t!' ♦ • • . • • ,• • • XXX xntr . r r H J+'.}.�-.M.M!"-M 1--4 M H M M X % X N 7)�•• H r t K • • • • • I • • • • • K X x X n `+ o • • . . t • • • • • ♦ X X X K m ♦ ♦ ♦ r • ♦ • ♦ x x x K n•w .• to • • . . • • • • • X X x x T'►' •t11 O' c . ?.",1-•,H:}-a,N t••./•-H M}.+M M M X K X X n . r. ': • . x x x x n To • • f ♦ ♦ : ♦ ♦ • • • x x . x n _ 4T MMH MH..-H HMr MM x x \ X n % . ': '� vlA- i'7 � }'.:�sti''..S%ri '� ?' � yS .�*!rdU':, �e' �! .4• ,� •� .Oi":s*, .� j .:..,�}r ::iRW: Aty }::_ 3t r..,� •. i ,;.�-r.:-' '-,::''•= `r - 70 t ow N NI's (1, (f. C It Ln m N W ru c z c z C c cn c O r- C' C C C 69voo rr :r r?' -n Cl x rT rr ry ril )< rn X T cr el . . . . . . . . ... . ——-—--—————-—- - - - - x, C, x -u .. . . . . . . . . . . x r) x ri x -D ———— -——————— C-) -U cr cn r)n n -0T tr Q Q rn n r) . . . . . . . .0 -n V A A ALn • r) in . . . . . . IT ...... Lp r) -u Ln Lp GI rn C) • ;n ry a C-1 T Cl L14 I k� "tl :}.�y:°:, ...5•;.' .-1�;. .;...:. ,•'r;.�' 7,. ,j.PrFtl'•" .ti 4�1+ f. �t_ ,1',......�.. -:... .:r .,:•.....;}.•, :..::. :��.' .�. ::f+ ".ASS.[.;.� N'N +a• i4 ..-:.•. - �-: iP .•.t'�-:-. `7J� ..,.'. .:. ... ✓,a: t� �I. .� r t�::: lr.�W•4,-��t.N.G1:�f1��U�'�'�0�.',i.'�1V�•i+r. .�.� G' . 1 .!' Rf.J.. 1.1:(<.b tl:ll•'IV►+Y�.W-M1'.r r W,Iti•+C CG'✓.N.�+ j A •'1. ;. ire' 't: _ `�� 'li;,:�•:• O G O'Gti. R � \ �• b ' -~ F'r'1 r^.F"')�"f'1••,1�1 1-./F+1-t H H N 1-i 1•„Fr H 4 +j ,:'Y �j1tf7�QQ �i�: t ..''.r'- •A•,."ren+„d x ..Y: . '. '�-•• ..vi Jr...�. [fx• C 'fR ry ru T 40 nj ri Glia W C7 W fu ru Ln cn ro x � •J'.H I H? �•1 I•.r 6• Pi CA 0-4 ru In 6-4 CP IF � ,. .m �� i.•� , � Pi ct 'n• Cr a+ 1 Hr I . ' f l ., .. OAF•• �•!' � ., �..'.., s ,� � V EI. ' W C N N • j j • : £ it �s q� �l �. rlC-) r s c �+i n n 'cl c-� 't".0.'C T 13 't n r T` 'D T t' f t ,'r.. t 1 ,1 .p .G y N W U W.-. .- 1 C .A •..Y2 N .�. .: •f� • .: A.lw(�,' r C W r ...G.N. G 1 C - N'. s r _ ; ' s1 `� - l C C..O C l7•J C C G C O C 1 m~ d �+C-. r -� 1 v Y C C. 1.1 Y nnac1 t . L.L, 1 a z > L. .. _ c O c`C G c O c. C c O oO K m m m. - c nl V. 00mm -0 to. w a.U. c I r m i m mm m m b iZ. < m m 'r m Z m 1 n ut M m-4 O-1 .c m m rr.Cl -[ s xM2• m MC �< <s C O N O 1 r11 rl In - v r+ 0 r. Cr. r: K O n--1 C: 'U 3 sov 1 m o-+.+0 mmz m 1 v, - Izmoz Z m 1 r m 0 z -4 r'1 r7 1 x U) o x 1 1• v O T m :C r -+ 1 H i T m•-. 1 C rr1 m z 1 1 rn I I 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 o c o o c o o I m ' NN+-• NNN N N l 0r• i OOONOO O+- OO 1 C r'r I + 1 i I r I I i o 0 0 0 C.o c c o 0 0 0 1 r- i I b C . N In ACO W N .+Z r a V Q 1 \ --1 m \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ 1 m m n m NNN NNN 1 -+ n 1 t• r'f 1 tr J .p Q'N N A A W N.- W I b x r -� x r-1 V J V J r J J J J V a, .O 10.O.O .c .O.0 ¢ 1 �1 rT z t rV rV NNnoN W1 ^ n b t j• , s.❑ i U-1 L- A Q`Lw— r-W N r 1- 1 c, x D, rV J-4 -s V J V V J V v VJ 1 UI K 2 N i y' x 1 I � \ a, Lon r,W W N ,- r r rb a J 1 .. , NPL)N NNN IrI V .D ON'rV C t W N W I A K E .D .O .(l .O.D.11 •Ll .P./l or OD (r 1 -� T r I ru - 1 q1 m a C)m m or rr m rlt or m«.m m 17) m a n n a n r` D b n b 1• I m CC Cl0C (;IC CGIC G'1 GI 1 U' 1 L 1 G ' 1 ..................... t I El"ll, "go i; m,4P Gr -b v ut: F ru In r T. N c OVI, cf. Ul- IL 7. 3: 2: V cn CA I 2- ;u CA I V.it c— C)fr Mtn I M c In mm In CA I�z In M :lu 14 "D fr.fr 1 0 tf j I CA nj a Cc C'1 C3 JC ru LV I U�rr ru ev n fr tAnj tofu pj_ 3.n 0: m ru ry ftj tw NN 10 W w -kv t 01 w ru tv. a, ru 4v IV tr W.LQ W r 1 un 4 rr fr 0 r,M ;r fr 1 V vi management .Summary The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System proposed by Eagle Signal Corporation will be designed and implemented by the systems department. • Contract administration will be under the direction of the marketing department. individuals from both departments have worked together as a team on past projects of a similar nature. Eagle Signal marketing and systems representatives have visited the Contra Costa facilities on several occasions to become familiar 11 with the objectives of the Fire Protection District. The following is a list of Eagle Signal, personnel asso- ciated with the Contra Costa project. John L. Schlaefli. Systems Manager Robert Kohls Project Manager Roy Finkelstein Systems Analyst Dale Fugate Senior Systems Software ,Specialist J. Patrick Short Marketing Manager Robert E. Smith Product ,Specialist '73 �t�4 The major project work tasks will be performed at: G + W Eagle Siqnal Corporation 8004 Cameron Road Austin, Texas 78753 512-837-8300 Eagle Signal will furnish and install all hardware , software, documentation, training and installation services necessary for an operational system. Incidental site preparation including electrical, air conditioning , and minor structural changes are the responsibility of the Fire District. Eagle Signal will cooperate with the Fire District to accomplish the necessary changes . This will include supply of all necessary cost estimates , floor plans and lay- outs, electrical load requirements , air conditioning re- quirements and installation schedules . Eagle Signal will accept a subcontract with the supplier of the mobile status reporting system. The subcontractor will be : Coded Communications Corporation 6241 Yarrow Drive Carlsbad, California 92008 714-438-2800 The subcontractor ' s representative will be designated by Mr. John E. Tyler, Jr. , Manager, Data Products . VII Related Corporate .Exugrience • Eagle Signal Corporation, a Gulf + Western .Manufacturing Company, is an operating unit of one of the world's largest corporations. Gulf + Western is involved in almost every aspect of business including manufacturing, agricultural products, natural resource development, apparel, leisure time activities, automotive replacement parts and consumer products. Gulf + Western reported sales in 1977 of $3, 6420998,000. Eagle Signal Corporation, a Gulf + Western . Manufacturing Company, was , established in 1921 as a fire. alarm, traffic and industrial controls company. It has since grown to become one of the largest and most successful companies in North America serving state and local government transpor- tation and public safety requirements. 7. 1 Organization and Facilities Eagle Signal moved in mid 1976 to its present 200,000 square foot headquarters and manufacturing plant in Austin, Texas. This new building provides a modern and efficient setting for Eagle Signal 's manufacturing, engineering, sales , systems and administrative operations. . Austin, Texas , the new home of Eagle Signal, is, a modern and attractive city of 300 ,000_. Austin is a growing, 004'7- electronics center that includes major installations of IBM,' Texas Instruments , Westinghouse, Data General Corpor- ation, Motorola, and Tracor, Inc. ' 'As a result' Of' it's' pleas ant climate and major educational institutions; such as' University of Texas and Saint Edwards University, Austin provides a highly motivated, well trained labor pool. This enables Eagle Signal to employ over 400 talented and skillful workers in all phases` of its operations. Eagle Signal Corporation is fully organized to plan, develop, manufacture and support a full line of standard transportation and public safety products. in addition , Eagle Signal is able to tailor emergency communications systems for a variety of specialized requirements. The functions of several key departments are described in this document including the -engineering department, systems department, and operations department. In addition, appropriate achievements by Eagle Signal in emergency communications are described. 7. 1. 1 Engineering Department Eagle Signal is recognized as a leader in its industry as' a result of its innovative and competent engineering department. A complete range of engineering functions within 00476 T the department are,,performed including development engineering, and applications engineerinq. The development engineering group concentrates on developing new products as part of an on going program. Recent new products include the DT100 Digital Detector which employs an Eagle Signal designed large scale integration (LSI) device. Other new products include the VCL 100 Emergency Voice. Dispatching. System, , andithe HDP110 Hardcopy Printer/Controller` System:. The applications engineering group provides support ,engirieering for customer applications of Eagle Signal traffic and emergency communications pro- ducts. This group designs communications consoles and test equipment. It also reviews and tests outside purchases of system components , for suitability and operation. Eagle Signal provides its engineering staff,-with a full range of technical support services. These. services include a staff of technicians, a drafting group, a publications library and an engineering .laboratory,. In addition, the multiple library facilities of the -nearby University 'of Texas are available to Eagle Signal employees. The engineeringlaboratory is equipped with numerous oscilloscopes., voltmeters and other standard test equipment. In addition, ;the laboratory is, equipped with 'a model 810D Biomation Digital:-Recorder that enables up to .eight (8) channels of monitoring of logic circuits; to facilitate circuit design. The laboratory is also equipped with a Ratek Non Contact Thermometer! to enable circuit test and design for better ,heat distribution.-. The engineering, laboratory is equipped with an' RF Screen Room. The Screen;.,Room is .12' by 9' by ,9' . ItAs equipped with .a Hewlett- Packard 9554B �Spectrum Analyser that enables circuit analysis, and detection of sporadic emmissions for RF free equipment adjustment and calibration. The Screen Room is also equipped with a Hewlett Packard 844A Tracking Generator. The engineering laboratory is equipped with a Webber Environmental Test Chamber with heat and cooling capabilities from minus (--) 1000 F to plus (+) 2100 'F. - Full humidity control is provided. The laboratory is also equipped with ,a model 7623A Tektronix Memory Oscilloscope to facilitate circuit test and design. The engineering laboratory includes a separate test equipment calibration laboratory. The calibration staff is responsible for the accurate �calibration,-of. :engineering and manufacturing test equipment on a scheduled basis. a.,. p04'78 The calibration laboratory ` is equipped with standard and special equipment including: a Model 515A Tektronix Portable Calibrator; a Model TG 501 Tektronix Time Mark Generator; a Model SG 5.03 Tektronix Leveled Sine Wave Generator; a Model PG 506 Calibration Generator; a Model 9038 Dana Microprocessing Timer Counter; and a Model 105A Hewlett Packard Quartz Oscillator. r 7. 1. 2 Systems, De]artment Eagle Signal has a fully staffedSystems ` Department. The systems group consists of high level professionals who are responsible for major systems design, development and implementation. The Eagle Signal Systems Engineers have extensive experience in the application of mini--computers . and micro-processors. The systems group also provides project management ser- vices for Eagle Signal -turnkey installations. Project management services include project definition, specifica- tion preparation and review, and project scheduling. Access to PERT/CRITICAL PATH METHOD computer programs assures effective system management control of projects . The Systems Department is supported by a fully equipped software development laboratory. The laboratory has a Data General Development System which includes a NOVA 2 mini- Z' � s rQQ4"1: f xil 1 1 r computer,with a 65.,00W byte' 'core memory. Peripheral equip- ment includes, a 2: 4 million byte Diablo; 31 disk memory, a 9-track magnetic tape #transport,, a, Data Products Line' Printer,, a Paper .,Tape .Reader Punch ;and ,Video 'Displ.ay Terminals. Eagle Signal also uses a Motorola Model 6800 Micro- processor Development System with a 16 ,000 byte random access memory, a Beehive Video Display-,Terminal!, :.Centronix 120 CPS ,Printer, Remen,.300 CPS-,Paper.:Tape/Reader Punch and a Bridge Data Card. Reader. The Systems Department also provides .technical field support for many Eagle Signal products and: systems,. Other Eagle Signal technical support facilities include field engineering offices at several strategic off-site locations. Field engineers are fully trained on :all ,Eagle products and are supported ,With excellent.%documentation:. Eagle Signal also maintains a fully, stocked spare parts inventory: and is capable ,of ;responding to ,a customer's needs on an overnight iasis. - 00480 i • 7. 1. 3 Manufacturing Operations Eagle Signal manufactures a full line of traffic and public safety products. Manufacturing operations are' per- formed in Austin and at several off premise facilities including Eagle Signal in Melbourne, Victoria,- Australia. The Eagle Signal manufacturing functions include pur- chasing, manufacturing, manufacturing services, and pro- control., .. Production ro- control., ..Production facilities are available for electronic solid state and electro-mechanical assembly, final product assembly, painting, silkscreening, cable assembly and product testing. Electronic solid state assembly is facilitated by the use of an Electrovert Wave Solder Unit which enables fast and efficient production of electronic circuit boards. Manufactured standard products are subject to defined mechanical and electrical tests before final acceptance and shipment to the customer. A quality assurance group designs, monitors and reviews all test procedures for effectiveness. All design and manufacturing departments have access to a large 9 ' x 12 ' x 12 ' Webber Environmental Test Chamber c tied in the assembly area. The test chamber is large enough to accommodate Eagle Signal's products: The chamber. has� a, temperature range of: from minus (--) 2000; F to plus (+) 1900 F with full humidity:control:., Production efficiencyl:i's constantly=sinonitore'd., ' 'Industrial engineers utilize a fully equipped methods laboratory for ;this purpose-.. ;.. -,; Each-;state of.�-.the-:ptoductionf.�prbcess<:,;from.Asa-les:)order entry: to shipping and--billing�; utilizes- the facilities of an IBM 370-115 ,located on the premises. This enables effective production scheduling, material control '�and accountability. It also assures Eagle Signal customers of timely completion_of their contracts. - 0'0482 i'f f. r2 ■i!F( y y �� 7. 2 Experience Several on- oirior recentl ' com leted -on-going y p projects have application to this * pr( work. Those considered most a -.1 - f.{.i� ..% r.; r�l'event' a`ie''described by�the following paragraphs. El..�:'S• }il:. . i(. .'f:C.. ;.r`—,',i{ .. .a}`�I,i..t•'c"t .e:J�.rC'I r.`•.fY:. 'r,'.i::..:+.; rte .,. .t A.: i,?:3+..'5:.�T'.. ' S' r 7 ,r f I: is ° t1"•i t.? Sjt:-�... ,a r'+ .G.,�C.r Cy*•.'i.t 1 7. 2. 1 Washington D. C. Emergency Communications System Eagle Signal Corporation designed, furnished and installed a modern Emergency Communications system for the District of Columbia Fire Department. The system will permit faster and more accurate receipt of alarm reports and the dispatch of fire apparatus within the nation' s capitol. The D.C. fire Department is currently responding to more than forty thousand fire alarms and over eighty thousand ambulance requests per year. The Eagle Signal Emergency Communications System consists of six major subsystems . These include Computer Aided Dispatch; Fire Station Printers ; Citizen Emergency Voice Communications ; Map Display and Control; Voice Alerting and Dispatch; and Operator Consoles. The total system was pro- vided under a turnkey arrangement under which Eagle Signal was fully responsible for a complete and satisfactory oper- ation. This includes all hardware, software, installation , documentation, training, and warranty service . The Computer Aided Dispatch System enables the receipt of both voice and coded alarm reports, and verification of emergency locations. The system provides currently available apparatus assignments and instantly updates unit status on operator terminals and map displays . Complete written event logs and reports are also provided. • The Computer AidedDispatch System performs reliably because of dual computers with automatic' switchover which enable continued operations should either processor fail. . Reliability is further assured by the use of an uninter- ruptible power supply which fully isolates the computer system from outside power fluctuation or losses. The main operator interface with the Computer' S'ystem is a series of working 'displays' that ` facilitate 'the_ alarm receipt dispatch and 'command v rocess using nine video dis- play units with keyboards. Simple 'English language com- mands , special function keys , location aids and error correction aids assure rapid and efficient operation of the system. The video display units are used by fire dispatchers, ambulance dispatchers , radio operators , telephone operators and supervisors. Dispatch and administrative messages are transmitted by the computer to thirty-two (32) high speed Fire Station Printers. The Fire Station Printer System uses fire depart- ment maintained circuits . Full printer supervision and data error protection is provided. Fire fighters may acknowledge messages to assure prompt responses to alarms . The 'Citizen Emergency voice Communication System 'fully re- places the .public .fire 'alarm telegraph boxes located throughout the , District. The voice'- stations are designed' to permit 'T o o voice reports by the public of all types of emergencies. Tire and ambulance dispatchers are thus .able to tailor emergency responses. The voice system cuts down on needless alarm responses and enables more effective use ;of -vital fire department resources. Two floor mounted Map Displays provide system users . with command overview ,.of fire and amb.ulance 'coverage, facili- tating move-.up, and fill .in , decisions. The �Map Displays are updated by the computers. Map control panels at dispatcher positions permit manual override of the display to enable continued operation during degraded conditions . Voice alarm dispatches are made over land lines using the Vocalarm II Emergency Voice Dispatch System. The Vocalarm II consists of four dispatcher Console Control positions and thirty-two Tire Station Units . Two way station selective or all call dispatch operation provides complete system flexi- bility. A non verbal fire fighter acknowledgement feature confirms receipt of voice messages quickly and efficiently. All circuits are electrically supervised in conformance with the standards set forth by the National Tire Protection Association. Operator Consoles are provided for the fire dispatchers , ambulance dispatchers,, radio operator, telephone operator and 'supervisors. The .work station concept used- in the: system enables efficient use of,;;system ,contzols by, the:. operators , j� ] 0048 ► �T \ The Consoles were first designed in cardboard mock.-up to assure ease of operation. The Washington ;D.C. Fire, Department developed the geographic ,,data base :used with the ComputerAided Dispatch System under guidance of Eagle. Signal. The data base was integrated into the system on site by department personnel. The DCFD Emergency.,Communication! System cost $1, 600,000 not including building alterations ., The project was begun in January 1976 . Reference: Mr. James Flynn Director of Communications District of Columbia Fire Department 300 MacMillan Drive Washington, D.C. 20001 202-795--2260 , � � 0048`( 7. 2. 2 Seattle Fire Department Audio Message System Eagle Signal Corporation is currently under contract to the Seattle Fire Department to furnish and install a computer based Audio'Message' System (AMS) The new system will include four fire dispatcher vehicle status displays and keyboards. Fire station status control panels will be installed in each Seattle fire station. The system will facilitate both voice and digital dispatch messages using dedicated telephone lines. Eagle Signal will provide under a turnkey arrangement, all hard- ware, software, documentation training, installation and testing required for a complete and satisfactory operation. The Seattle AMS is based on concepts developed by the Seattle fire Department. It will enable fire dispatchers to instantly identify available units for dispatch, and signal the appropriate stations and units . Responses will be automatically confirmed as units leave the stations. The dispatchers will be alerted of failures. This is in conformance with the recommendations of the National Fire Protection Association. The Fire Station Status Control panels permit individual fire fighting units to quickly notify the fire alarm center of status changes resulting from local alarm reports or equipment malfunctions. The report will automatically update 094881 r the dispatcher status displays and alert vehicles leaving • the stations . The system will enable dispatches to be made more quickly than is possible with current methods. This is because the computer will automatically select the appropriate land line circuits , enable operation of station audible signals , and activate the station speakers following a single operator command. The system constantly tests all station telephone lines and informs the operators of any changes that may affect system operation. The Seattle Audio Message System cost $240 ,000 . The contract was started in February, 1978 and is expected to be completed by January, 1979. Reference: Mr. Owen D. Pletan Chief of Communications Seattle Fire Department 301 Second Avenue South Seattle , Washington 98104 206 - 625-4353 • r 1 Y i Y. �Il. f ,� a{ !S>J..•' r'F ys ` .�. ¢ j�;, C ,, 1. M1}gyps t ,Y�1 k 7. 2. 3 Buffalo Emergency Communications System Eagle Signal Corporation will furnish an Emergency Communications System to the Buffalo Fire Department. The system will be installed by Signacon Controls , Inc. , an Eagle Signal dealer. The system will be installed in the new Buffalo Fire Alarm Center and will enable more effer_- tive alarm receipt and dispatch, and efficient control of vital fire fighting resources. The Buffalo Emergency Communications System includes five major components provided by Eagle Signal. These include a Citizen Voice Emergency Communications System; a Printer and Display System; a Voice Alert and Dispatch System; a Map Display System; and Consoles and Enclosures . The system components will be completely assembled and tested as a system at the Eagle Signal plant in Austin prior to shipment to the customer site. The system will be supplied with all hardware, software, installation supervision , docu- mentation, training and acceptance testing required for a completely satisfactory performance. The Citizen Emergency Voice Communications System includes all necessary central office components to upgrade the telegraph fire alarm system to use citizen voice stations. These components include power supplies , t 1i switching equipment, batteries and a comprehensive test desk to assure conformance with the standards set forth by the National Fire Protection Association. In addition fifty new Citizen Voice Stations will be placed on the streets. The voice stations are designed to enable fire dispatchers to tailor assignments and reduce responses due to false alarm attempts. The Printer and Display System will display alarm signals at three operator positions. Alarms, operator acknowledgement and completed calls along with the date and time will be logged on printers. The system will assure prompt and efficient handling of voice and coded alarms by the fire dispatchers . Voice alarm dispatches will be made over existing fire department circuits using the Vocalarm II Emergency Voice Dispatch System. The Vocalarm II will consist of three operator Control Consoles and thirty-two Fire Station Units. The system will enable two way selective or all call alerting of fire fighting units. Station acknowledgement may be verbal or non-verbal. The system will include local paging at the fire stations. The Map Display System will include a large floor mounted Map Unit and three operator control panels. The system will enable display of the current status of fire units and personnel. 00491 f r • Unit status will include units in quarters and available, out of service or on the air. The map display will facili- tate dispatch and move up decisions. The operator consoles and enclosures were designed to enable efficient dispatcher operations including alarm receipt, address verification, response selection and vehicle control. The consoles will also contain all fire base station radio controls and building closed circuit TV and security alarms. These components will be installed on the site. The Buffalo Emergency Communications System cost $780 ,000. It will be installed and operational by July 1978. The pro- ject was started in September, 1977. Reference: Mr. Jeremiah Sullivan Chief of Communications Buffalo Fire Department 332 Ellicott Street Buffalo, New York 14202 716 856-6600 • h� rtu4t� Nr'7N�9pt�Y� Asx} F x,tiro P '•S 1 l t r t :i 3 J VIII Personnel Qualifications Qualified people are key factors in any successful business. Eagle Signal Corporation has over 400 employees in the United States' involved in the systems engineering, design, manufacturing', sales and "service of public safety related products. These people represent literally thou- sands of years of practical experience that can be applied directly to a client's need for continuing support or the development of `new and innovative public safety systems. As a service organization, the principal value of Eagle Signal rests on the capabilities and performance of its staff members. Strong capabilities in systems engineering, computer systems, analysis, electronics engineering, com- puter simulation, programming, management, transportation engineering, operations research and manufacturing are present and represe'nted .on almost every project. The major qualifications of Eagle Signal to carry out this `work rest principally `on the reputation and experience of its professionals. Professional experience 'of "each of the individuals expected to contribute to this project has been summarized in the following pages. ,n r 0 44 -9,J �";tay..)! f, .r t _., „ x} i `,b,F J7 ,,z,' ?. 'yti'. .,v1. _., �.! .. .,t .n..; ... _. x^• �, „. .. ..x w. A JOHN L. SCHLAEFLI • Education Purdue University - June 1961 - B. S. Engineering Science Catholic University of America - June 1964 - M. S. Engineering Registered Professional Traffic Engineer, State of California Experience Eagle Signal Corporation - 1973 - Present, Systems Manager Responsible for all technical and administrative activities of the Eagle Signal Systems Department. Manages and directs transportation and public safety communications studies , systems engineering and systems development. Inter- nationally recognized consultant to government and industry . Stanford Research Institute - 1966 to 1973 , Manager, Traffic Operations Engineering Program, Engineering Systems Division Responsible for the development of traffic engineering, traffic safety and traffic control capabilities of Stanford Research Institute. Project leader responsible for manage- ment and technical aspects for the systems analysis and design of new traffic control systems , evaluation of capital improvement projects , development of multi-jurisdictional traffic records systems , development and evaluation of selec- tive enforcement programs and traffic and transportation engineering studies. Developed a specialized professional • >�, � � 0049�� • competence in transportation and traffic engineering analysis , traffic safety analysis , computer systems analysis , systems engineering and operations research. Analytical Services , Inc. -- 1961 to 1965 , Operations Analyst Performed operations research and systems engineering studies and developments for the United States Air, -force Office of Research and Development Planning. U.S. Marine Corps —1954 to 1958 , Captain, Naval Aviator Organizations Operations Research Society of America, Past Chairman, Transportation Science Section Transportation Research Board, Chairman, Traffic Records Committee Institute of Traffic Engineers Scientific Research Society of America Sigma Gamma Tau ROY 'P. PINKELSTEIN Education SB Degree Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1961. SM Degree Electrical Engineering/Operations Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, '1963. Completed course requirement for Ph.U, Stanford University Professional Experience G & W Applied Transportation Systems, Inc. (subsidiary of Eagle- Signal Corporation)- '1973 to Present, Systems Analyst Responsible for the design of Computer Aided Dispatch Systems, Assignment Information and Dispatch Systems and Hardcopy Printer Dispatch Systems for use by fire depart- ments and other service agencies. Preparation of proposals and descriptive literature for these systems. Major con- tributor to the system design of the Rio-Niteroi Bridge Traffic Control project. Sylvania Socio-Systems Laboratory - 1970 to 1971 Responsible for structuring and performing a wide variety of research projects involving the analysis of complex systems through the application of operations research, decision analysis, and modeling and simulation techniques. Performed a systems study of traffic enforce- ment/driver control for the State of California; position in this study was that of Technical Director. t 00493 (a 9 f 4y � h Stanford Research Institute - 1963 to 1969 , Operations • Analyst Representative assignments included the design and programming of a large scale dynamic simulation of traffic flow used to analyze and evaluate alternative improvements to a street or highway network; ' the development of planning and program selection procedures for NASA; the development and evaluation of .new system, concep.ts for processing, handling and transporting bulk mail for the United States Post Office; feasibility studies of computerized information systems for the storage and retrieval -of medical systems and of tactical ground combat; and the development of computer simulations for the evaluation of terrain avoidance/clearance systems and for the analysis of air defense systems. Publications "An Optimum System for Traffic Enforcement/Driver Control" , Final Report, GTE Sylvania, October 1971. A Rational Approach to Urban rban Highway Congestion" , Final Report, SRI,,, :July _19.67. "Time Dependent Priority.Queues", .Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, Volume 15, No. 1, Jan- Feb. , 1967• .. 1 1 Numerous SRI Technical Reports 1 (0U440 ROBERT J. KOHLS Education Platterville State College - Pre-engineering, , 1965 University of Wisconsin - B.S.E.E. , _196.8 Graduate engineering courses from the University of Illinois University of Iowa, and the`:University of Wisconsin. Presently in MBA prograM' at' St 'Edwward' s ' University ' 'Experience - Eagle Signal Corporation, Senior Systems Engineer Mr. Kohls has had 9 years experience in Digital Control Systems Design. The last 7 years has been with Eagle Signal as both an Application and Systems Design Engineer. He served as the Project Engineer for the Savannah, Georgia Traffic Con- trol, System. He was also the Project Engineer on the`Digital Traffic Systems for Arvada, Coloraao-, Concord, 'Cal:ifornia, and Colorado Springs, Colorado. Mr. Kohls is a registered professional engineer in the State of Illinois ' and �has worked in related � industry ,as a Computer Hardware Engineer. He is serving asProject Manager on the Computer Aided Dispatch' Emergency 'Communication System being installed in Washington, D.C. and is presently the Project manager on Audio Message System for the City of Seattle fire Department. 00498 � i J. PATRICK SHORT Education St. Ambros *College - H.I . Physics ,' 195£ Experience Eagle Signal. Corporation, Marketing Manager Eighteen years experience in the design and application of Traffic Control' Systems arid' Equipment. ' Ten years of management experience involving the 'technical aspects �of Traffic Control. Equipment and Systems, the development of Design Parameters for new equipment and assisting using agencies in the application of new equipment and control techniques to improve efficiency and safety. Former Systems Department Manager. Mr. Short served as Industry Representative to the ITE Technical Council 'in 1972 and, is Vice Chairman of NEI-LA Techni.cal ' Committee for Traffic Control Devices. J DALE L. FUGATE Education Purdue University -, B.S.E.E. - 1972 Major: Electrical Engineering; Minor: Computer Science Experience Eagle Signal Corporation - 1974 -present, Senior Systems Software:,Special.ist _ Mr.- Fugate„ has been responsible, for, -the; development , .of the :software ,,used in Eagle Signal ET800 and. MC800 computerized traffic controller- and submaster. He has also worked ,on developing the applications software and designed the auxiliary logic for Eagle' s DP900 traffic controller. Mr. Fugate is responsible, for software development in the systems group. He has worked on all ,COMTRAC and .COMTRAC II traffic systems and has provided consultation on computer aided .dispatch:,development• He ,has experience with .the following ,machines; DCD6500, IBM360, IBM1620,1 TBM7099_, , PDP-,8 , : ; PDP-9, MICRO DATA-400, DATA GENERAL NOVA, INTEL8008 and 8080, and MOTOROLA 6800. He has experience with the following languages : Fortran, Basic, Algol, PL1, and Assembly Language for CKC, Data General, DEC, Micro Data, Intel, and Motorola. Mr. Fugate has eight years of programming experience with five years of that being real time operating systems . r 8.1 Project Manager • The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be designed and implemented under the overall direction of the Eagle Signal Corporation Systems Manager. Specific project management tasks will be performed by Mr. Robert Kohls , Professional Engineer. 8.2 Work Location The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will iY be designed and assembled at the Eagle Signal facility in Austin, Texas. 00401 e� i IX Additional Information The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be subject to the following conditions : 9 . 1 Proposal Acceptance Period The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System des- cribed and priced herein is offered on a firm basis for ninety (90) calendar days from the closing date for receipt of proposals as established by the Fire District. 9 . 2 Progress Payments Eagle Signal Corporation, upon contract award, will request progress payments at appropriate times based upon the milestone accomplishments as stated in Section V Work Schedule. 9 . 3 Structural Alterations Upon review of the system equipment requirements and the floor plan submitted by the Fire District, Eagle Signal anticipates no major structural alterations will be required . 9 . 4 Contract maintenance The system equipment offered may be maintained during the installation and warranty period by the hardware manu- facturer: Data General Corporation 120 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105 V tl 415 - 543-6730 Y < 9 . 5 Software Development Location The system ,software development ' tasks will be performed at the followinga.work location Eagle Signal Corporation 8004 Cameron Road Austin,Texas 78,753" `f : 512 - 837-8300 9 .6 System Capabilities The software provided with the Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System may be used without major adjustment to accommodate: A. Fifteen Cities (estimated total population of '800 ,000) B. Party fire stations C. Two .hundred and fifty (250) fire vehicles The data base will have to be expanded accordingly. 9 .7 Hardware Capabilities The system hardware selected for the 'Contra Costa Com- puter Aided ,Dispatch., System are standard off the shelf' equipment ,.. The , computer. is fully expandable- to'-accommodate up to 128K words (256K bytes) MOS memory. The:disk -cartridge subsystem yodel 604'5 'id:,supplied with ,a .,controller which ,w,il,l l:accommodate up to`,four 10 megabyte dual drives. YV , _ 99 E _ 9 A dual porting option may be added' to the system at a future time and will be supplied if the dual computer option is purchased, The diskette -subsystem Model O' 3b"his supplied with a con- troller which will accommodate up' to four drives The addi- tional drives may be used with 10 megabyte disk units . The communications chassis 146de' l 4251 'wa:il accommodate up to, four 'communications control units 'and will be' supplied with sixteen programmable asynchronous line multiplexers equipped with FTA interfaces. Basis system requirements will utilize eight lines leaving eight available for future expansion requirements. 9 . 8 Factory Service Eagle Signal Corporation will maintain 'in' Austin suitable documentation on the Contra Costa Computer"Aided' Dispatch System. Software will be stored 'in computer readable `form. Representatives of the systems department will be avail- able for consultation about the system and are available for field service on warranty and post warranty problems. Non warranty support service is available on a reasonahlA tiTie and travel basis and rates will be quoted in advance. 9 . 9 Rights to Software The Contra Costa Computer. Aided Dispatch System ,will utilize applications software based in part-upon-,other systems prepared by Eagle Signal Corporation and its subsidiaries,. The , Contra,Costa applications software will be tailored to the specific requirements of ,the Contra Costa Fire Protection District ,and is . intended for the ;sole ,and exclusive use of the Fire District. The Fire District may, at its option,, give or ,sell, the aforesaid ; application soft- ware to other public, agencies .for use within Contra Costa County so long ,as a .written provision in the gift or sale agreement of the aforesaid application software shall be included which states that the aforesaid public agencies will not give or sell the .applieation software to any other public or private entity. District array also, enter "into a. joint dispatch- . .; The Fire , i,ng agreement with.,other .gommuni.ties. which will, entail: use of the applications software. t- a Q}F[63 j\1iy 00�'] N ill tl a CD 73 G � _ 1' 0 . r�r -d rfF a0 CD 71 CL D Lo n� X /� ✓ ;i MM " W 03 p O N 3 -0 �1 OLn =C ^ 1 • I !1- i ; .t A P P E N p I }{ r I Product Specifications sq: 3 MODEL 531E The Model 531E is a microprocessor-based CRT ;...,... terminal; it is software-compatible with the Ann OUTLINE Arbor K2480 Batch terminal. The standard version It _i' I DIMENSIONS displays 1920 upper-case characters in a 24 x 80 21,00" format. It includes three character accents, formatted (53.34cm) data entry, buffered printer output, and line and - character editing with an 82-key detachable keyboard. All the control and command functions can be executed from the keyboard. These include cursor positioning, setting the accent register, changing baud �17,00�(43.18cm)� rate, input/output mode, display and keyboard modes. The Model 531 E also has many extras --- such such as the 15-inch non-glare screen, auxiliary video output, individual cursor and edit keys, and flexi- I 14.00 bility in cases and options available. Please contact ! (35.56cm) --� Ann Arbor Terminals for more information. BASIC SPECS CONTROLS Display Page, Roll Display Format 80 characters x 24 lines Send Rate 110 to 9600 Screen 15"diagonal 1/0 Local, Full, Half-Duplex Character Set 64-character ASCII Print Rate 110 to 9600 Character Accents Blink, dim, reverse-video Keyboard TTY, Fuli-ASCII Cursor Blinking field Data Interface RS232-compatible Baud Rates 110.9600,selectable from keyboard OPTIONS Keyboard Full-ASCII with cursor controls, TTY-lock, separate numeric pad Part Number Description and 12 function keys 208531 Model 531 E Terminal Weight 35 lbs. 208531.94 D-Case 201179.01 U/L-Char Disp 201179.02 40-Char Line COMMANDS 201179.11 Parity Xmit 201179.20 Auto LF on CR 201179.21 Hold at EOL Erase memory, line or page 201169.29 Bell Cursor home, return,up,down, right or left 201179.98 50 Hz Refresh Set cursor position 205279.98 230 VAC Power Tab 201163.10 Function Keys Set character accent 208531.90 Omit Keyboard Insert/Delete line or character 205295 Port Extender Cable Set protect, Ilrint,enter or KSR 205271 RS232 Cable 205244 Current-loop Cable Send page 205290 Rack Panel 0050 6107 JACKSON ROAD • ANN ARBOR,MICHIGAN 48103 • TEL:313.769.0926 • TWx:810.223.6033 Copyright 1978 Ann Arbor Terminals,Inc. Printed In U.S,A. 4PDataGeneral FEATURES • Memory Management and Protection Unit • Dual operations capability • Economical 32K-word MOS and 16K-word core r I memory modules + +' • High-speed 700-nanosecond MOS memory modules • MOS memory parity ,a w • Memory capacity up to 128K words „ • Muldregister architecture • Extended NOVA© line Instruction set • Wide range of standard configurations • 12-slot modular construction • Removable power supply module • Large selection of peripherals, communications and I10 devices • Options Include battery backup, hardware multiplyldlvlde, ..?, and floating point processor ^ f • Full operating system and high-level language support • Comprehensive customer support 1 r DESCRIPTION Data General's NOVA WD Is asystems-oriented computer that palible, field-proven peripherals. These features make NOVA offers 32K-word MOS memories for optimum packaging 3/D well suited to dual operations system applications In density, 128K-word maximum memory capacity, a Memory communications, Instrumentation and control, computation Management and Protection Unit, easy configurablllty, and and data systems. The NOVA 31D has twelve subassembly high-level systems software. NOVA 311 runs under Data slots in a 101/2-Inch chassis. An optional 10Y2-inch rack- General's Real-lime Disc Operating System(RDOS),diskette- mounted 110 expansion chassis extends the system's capacity based Disc Operating System(DOS),and Real-Time Operating to 24 subassembly slots. System(RTOS).It uses Data General's extensive line of com- MEMORY -- Motal-Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) memory with 700-nano- 800-nanosecond cycle time and 16K-word versions with second cycle time Is available In 32K-word modules for optl- 1-microsecond cycle time. MOS and core memory modules mum packaging density, as well as 16K-, 8K-, and 4K-word each occupy one computer subassembly slot. When different Increments. All have optional parity. Data General-manu- speed and different technology memories are mixed In NOVA factured MOS memory chips have state-of-the-art silicon gale 3/D, the effective cycle time depends on the speed of the construction. Cora memory comes In 8K-word modules with memory.module accessed. MEMORY MANAGEMENT The Memory Management and Protection Unit (MMPU) per- leged Instructions, protection for 110 devices, and both write forms logical-to-physical address translation, giving user validity protection for main memory. With Data General's programs access to 128K words maximum of main memory Real-time Disc Operating System(RDOS), MMPU makes dual through four address extension tables (maps): two program operations possible. maps and two data channel maps. MMPU also permits privl- DUAL OPERATIONS Dual operations allows any two major systems programs to terminals can time share in BASIC;while a batch stream runs. . run simultaneously and Independently, each with full, pro- Or,a FORTRAN IV program can be compiled,while the system tected access to systems resources. For example, multiple produces management reports. Copyright 1976, 757 'D�t,�Ceneral Corporation. NOVA'% Isaroglsteredtrademark of Data General Corporation, All rights rosery (P�i6t ih U.S.A. DASHER is a trademark of Data General Corporation. �V VL►a7 012.305-1 CONFIGURATIONS The NOVA 31D Is 1W/2-inches high, rack-mountable, has The battery backup module Is contained within the 101/2-inch tweive subassembly slots,and is completely compatible with chassis.The 12-slot 110 expansion chassis Is a 101/2-Inch high the NOVA 3(12 and 314. It contains one central processor rack-mountable chassis that expands system capacity to 24 board,oneor more memory boards,the memory management slots. it connects to the NOVA 31D chassis with a standard and protection board,and space for 110 subassembly boards. 1/0 cable. MODULAR CONSTRUCTION The modular structure of the NOVA 31D includes high density a single removable printed circuit board, a very important packaging of large- and medium-scale Integrated circuitry, Innovation for system reliability. An etched backpanal makes and a minimum of interconnections, Major subassemblies all interboard connections. integral backpanei connectors are such as the central processor, memory modules, parity and provided for commonly specified peripherals such as the major options are on a single printed circuit board,simplifying diskette subsystem. trouble-shooting and repair.The power supply also occupies STANDARD EQUIPMENT AND OPTIONS The NOVA 3/D Includes programmer's console, 16-bit 110 bus.The MMPU,automatic program load,and powermonitor/ system, programmed data transfer, direct memory access, auto restart are also standard.Options include battery backup, automatic Interrupt source Identification, 61-device address- MOS memory parity, hardware multiply/divide, high-perfor- ing capability, 16-level programmed priority interrupt, hard- mance floating point unit,real-time clock,and 1/0 expansion ware stack architecture,external 110 bus connector, prewired chassis. peripheral connector,and electrically isolated system memory PERIPHERALS, COMMUNICATIONS AND 110 NOVA 3/D computers support the full range of Data General Data General also manufacturers the attractive,easy to operate designed and manufactured peripheral subsystems. These and highly reliable DASHER CRT display family and DASHER include:the 315-MBDGiDiskette Subsystem,the 1-and 2-MB 30-cps/60-cps Term Ina)Printerfamily,aswell asthe extremely Fixed Head DG/Disc Subsystem,and the96-and 190-MBDisc flexible Communications Subsystem (DG/CS), Data Acqul- Storage Subsystem.All are expandable to multiple drives per sltlon and Control Subsystem (DGIDAC), Intorcomputer controller. Otheravallable magnetic peripherals Include: the adapters, direct 360/370 interfaces and a line of paper tape DG/Tape Subsystem featuring 800-bpf,7-org-track recording reader/punch equipment.Also available is a family of 300/600 In 75-ips vacuum-column drive;and the Data General Cassette Ipm line printers, card readers and 1600-bpi taps drives. Subsystem. ARCHITECTURE The NOVA 31D central processor is organized around tour Includes 16 memory registers that are used for auto-increment, hardware accumulators, two hardware stack registers, and a auto-decrement operations. The multi-rogister architecture program counter. Two of the accumulators can be used as reduces the number of Instructions necessary for execution, Indexed registers. Hardware stack registers facilitate re- and simplifies programming. entrant and recursive subroutine programming. The system INSTRUCTION SET The NOVA 3/D instruction set Is an extended version of the and accumulators,and modify program flow officientiy.Input/ proven NOVA-line 16-bit, single-word multi-function Instruc- output instructions transfer data and control signals between tions and is completely compatible with the microNOVA-line the processorand peripherals,and are NOVA-line compatible. of 16-bit microprocessors.Arithmetic and logical instructions Extended Instructions include user-definable system trap execute one of eight basic functions, modify the operand, instructions, single word PUSH/POP and multiword SAVE/ shift the result, and test the result in only one cycle, Using RETURN stack Instructions to facilitate subroutine pro- direct, indirect, relative, and indexed addressing modes, gramming,and memory management and protection Instruc- memory reference Instructions move data between memory tions for control of more than 32K words of main memory. SOFTWARE Software available for the NOVA 310 computer includes three handlers and subroutines that control Input/output transfers compatible operating systems: a Real-time Disc Operating between user programs and analog and digital sensor devices. System(RDOS),that supports more than 32K words of NOVA The Communications Access Manager(CAM) software pack- memory;adiskette-based Disc Operating System(DOS);and a age supports Data General synchronous and asynchronous Real-Time Operating System(RTOS).Extended FORTRAN IV communications subsystems. Utility software available and FORTRAN 5,ALGOL,single-user and multi-user Extended includes RJE80 (278013780 communications emulator), BASIC,Business BASiCandMacro assembler are the language HASP Il, process 110 support, sort/merge, standard and processors which can be used with NOVA 3/D.Data General's relocatabie assemblers, relocatable loaders, and symbolic Sensor-Access Manager (SAM) provides a library of device debuggers. CUSTOMER SUPPORT _ Available to Data General customers is a worldwide support Service.A Special Systems group quotes on design and tabri- networkthat offers contract ua!services for SystemsEnginears, cation of special interfaces and products. The Data General Service Engineers and Customer Training. Also available Is a User's Group allows Interchange of user programs. Software Subscription Service and a Hardware Subscription ((� ((� (� !l!;I51 r SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Word length: 16 bits. Management and Protection Unit; register-based stack ad- General-Purpose Accumulators: 4. dressing on a Last-In, First-Out basis, and on a random- Stack Facility:1 central processor Stack Pointer,1 central pro- indexed basis. cessor Frame Pointer. Memory Increments:32K-,16K-,8K-,and 4K-word MOS;16K-, Memory Cycle Times: 700-nanosecond MOS memory, 800- and 8K-word core. nanosecond 8K-word core memory, 1000-nanosecond 16K- Memory Capacity: 131,072 words. word core memory. Bus System: Separate 110 and memory busses. Memory Conflgurabllily:Any combination of up to eight core, Memory Management: Dual mapped program spaces alloca- MOS parity,and MOS non-parity boards for up to 128K words table in 1K-word Increments via 32 registers in each of two maximum. In a system with both parity and non-parity mem- program spaces;64 datachannel map registers,each address- _ ory, the parity controller Ignores'accesses from non-parity ing a contiguous 1K-word space; 32K-word physical (un memory, mapped) program space. Add Time: MOS memory, 700-nanoseconds; core,memory, Direct Memory Access.Data.Channel: Standard-speed and 800.1000-nahosoconds. high-speed modes Included; maximum word transfer rates: Accumulator Load Time: MOS memory, 1100-1200 nano- 1.1 MHz In, .83 MHz Out; Maximum data channel latency: 5,0 seconds; core memory, 1300-2000 nanoseconds, microseconds. Address Modes: Direct address of 1024 words absolute, Input/Output system: 16-bit word length; 16 level priority- relative and Indexed modes; multi-level indirect addressing of Interrupt structure, 61 devices addressable; maximum Inter- 32,768 words to a maximum of 131,072 words with Memory rupt latency, 11.7 microseconds. OPTIONS Hardware Multiply/Divide: Multiply time, 5.8 microseconds; case double precision(64 bit)memory-to-register divide time, divide time,6.7 microseconds,(successful),1,5(unsuccessful). 22.1 microseconds. Hardware Floating Point:Worst-case single-precision(32 bit) Memory Parity: One parity bit per word; generates a parity memory-lo-register multiply time,10.9 microseconds; worst- fault Interrupt upon detecting an error. ELECTRICAL AC LlnoVollegos:Four options available forall chassis types- 1/0 Bus Levels: Ground and +3 volts. 100V, 120V, 220V, 240V all operable with +15%, -10% of nominal within the frequency range 47-63Hz and maximum Battery Backup: Maintains 32K words MOS memory data; load.Line voltage selection can be changed via Jumpers In the contents valid for up to two hours during power failure; re- chassis. charge time from fully depleted state, 24 hours during normal AC Power Consumption: 600 watts fully loaded. CPU operation. MECHANICAL Dimensions: 101/2"H x 19"W x 23"D. In gold and yellow color trim. Weight: 130 lbs., fully loaded; CPU expansion chassis, 130 Heat Generated: 2050 BTU/hr, maximum; CPU expansion lbs., fully loaded. chassis, 2050 BTU/hr. maximum. Front Panel: UL flame-relardent and scratch-resistant plastic FloatinS Point Procossor, Memory or I/O Floating Pnmt Processor. Memory or 1/0 r-... Peripheral Connector and Memory or Ito f yf Memory or I/O Memory or 1/0 Memory or 1/0 hlernoryorUO lam, !I: lit Ott :1 i• .J. tl... AF4 Moniory or 110 111111 sy•;tem Cran!,u1e Connector and Memory or 1/0 tAernory or 1/0 t _ -- '(_'-� Y, Mlu /T.10S Partly/Multiply-Divide.Memory or 1!0 r Central Processor 11 Power Supply Bonrd Battery Backup 00 1 NOVA 3/D Slot Allocation. AnaddrU nal 12 slot 1/0 expansion chassis is available - to f r r,. ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature Range 0' to 55°C operating; -35°C to +70°C Attitude Range: to 10,000' operating; to 50,000' storage: storag Relative elative Humidity Range: to 90% operating; to 95% storage. SALES AND SERVICE NORTH AMERICAN OFFICES: Westboro, ,Massachusetts, INTERNATIONAL OFFICES: ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires; 01581, (617) 366.8911,Headquarters. And AL:,Birmingham; AUSTRALIA: Adelaide, Brisbane,r,Melbourne,. New, Castle, AZ:Phoenix,Tucson;CA: EI Segundo,Palo;Alto,Paramount, Perth, Sydney,; AUSTRIA: Vienna;-:BELGIUM: Brussels; Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa;Ana, Santa , BRAZIL:Sao Paulo-,,COLUMBIA: Bogata;,COSTA RICA: San Barbara, Van Nuys, Woodland Hills;. CO Engelwood:, CT: Jose; DENMARK: Copenhagen; ECUADOR: Quito; EGYPT: North Branford; FL: Ft. Lauderdale, Orlando, Tampa',,,GA. Cairo;FINLAND:Helsinki;FRANCE:Paris,Le Piessis Robin. Atlanta;ID: Boise,lL: Poona; Schaumburg;' IN: Indianapolis; sons, Lyon; GERMANY: Dusseldorf, Eschborn, Fiiderstadt, KY: Louisville; LA: Baton Rouge; .MA: Cambridge, Spring- Hamburg,Munich,Ratigen,GREECE:Athens; HONG KONG; field, Wellesley, Worcester; MD: Baltimore; Ml Southfield; IRAN: Teheran; 'ISRAEL: Tel Aviv; 17ALY: Milano, Rome, MN:Minneapolis;MO: Kansas City,St.Louis; NC-Charlotte, JAPAN;Tokyo;KOREA:Seoul;KUWAIT! Kuwait City;LYBIA: Greensboro;.NH:Nashua; NJ:Cherry Hill,Wayne; NM:Albu Tripoli; MALAYSIA:' Kuaia Lumpur: MEXICO: Mexico City; querque;NV:Las Vegas: NY: Buffalo; Latham; Melville; New NETHERLANDS Rijswijk,' NEW ZEALAND:- Wellington York City, Newfield, Rochester;,Syracuse; OH: Columbus,• PERU: lama; PHILLIPINESi Makatl', Metro; Marrita;'PORTU- Dayton,Euclid;OK:Oklahoma City,Tulsa;OR; Portland; PA: GAL:_Llsbon; PUERTO RICO: Hato Rey; SAUDi ARABIA: Blue Beit, Carnegie; RI: Albion, Rumford; TN: Knoxville, Riyadh;SINGAPORE: Sri Lanka;SOUTH AFRICA: Johannes Memphis;TX:Austin,Dallas,EI Paso,Houston;UT:Salt Lake burg, Pretoria,, SPAIN:,Barcelona, Bllpao, .San.Sebastian, City;VA.,Hampton;McLean,Norfolk, Richmond,'Salemt WA: Valencia;SWEDEN:Gathdnborg, Malmo,Stockholm;SWITZ Kirkland; Wt: Menomee Fails; CANADA: Calgary, Alberta; ERLAND: Lausanne; Zurich; TAIWAN: Taipei; THAILAND: Edmonton, Alberta; Richmond, B.C.: Ottawa; Ontario; Bangkok;TURKEY:Ankara;UNITED KINGDOM:Birmingham; Toronto, Ontario; St, Laurent (Montreal), Ouebec, London; Manchester;Glascow,Scotland;URUGUAY,Monte- video; USSR. The materials contained herein are summary in nature,subject to equipment and software are available In the applicable technical change, and intended for general information only, Details and manuals, available through local sales representatives, specifications concerning the use and operation of Data General f/ 1 t co �.I)ataCenerAl ry ����! aj ,4 D�Cer�tmtCc�oratrgi,44t�blxorMasst�u�ttt}01581 t;6t7}t6fi�ti � 1 , til , .;; CrDataGeneral CAR,rniDGAE G EiiS00 ZltJ.3 sr T , r FEATURES • Designed and manufactured by Data General • 10- to 40-megabyte subsystem capacity • 5-megabyte removable and 5-megabyte fixed storage per unit • Dual porting optional • Unit number switch selectable • Allows DataGenoral diskette subsystems on same controller '+=1 1e £."' �:•`'' '' • Advanced packaging designed for Increased reliability • Compatible with all NOVAQ and ECLIPSED computers " • Full software support DESCRIPTION - The Cartridge,DGiDlsc Subsystem is designed and manu one removable 5-megabyte disc cartridge.,Subsystems pro factured by Data General to provide economical,flexible mass vide storage capacity to 40 megabytes, and the Model 6051 storage for NOVA and ECLIPSE computer systems. A sub Interface offers optional dual porting.The Cartridge DG IDisc system Includes up to four disc drives, power supplies, a Subsystems are fully software supported by Data General's controller,cartridges,and cable sets.Each disc drive contains extensive software library, Including multifunction operating a single spindle for one fixed 5-megabyte disc cartridge and systems,high-level language processors,and utility packages. OPERATION The 10-megabyte moving head cartridge disc drive uses one seconds.The disc drive operates at 2400 RPM and transfers r two-surface, 5-megabyte fixed disc platter and one two- data at 312,500 bytes per second. surface,5-megabyte removable cartridge. Each surface has a corresponding read-write head.The head positioning system A special circuit monitors the temperature gradient between provides fast radial positioning of the four heads to any one of the cartridge and the drive after a new medials loaded, and the 408cylinders.Average positioning time Is38milliseconds. provides for a safe temperature differential before operation Track-to-track head positioning takes a maximum of 8 milli Is begun. This Increases reliability and helps ensure data seconds. Maximum full stroke positioning time is 70 milli= Integrity. DUAL PORTING Dual porting Is an Integral part of the design of the Cartridge first computer are in use, since dual porting Is.Implemented DG/Disc Subsystem. it permits any two Data General com simply by adding a Model,6051,dual porting option to the puters to share access to discs In a coordinated fashion.,Thesecond computer.This option consists of a.disc controller and disc's unique dual porting design facilitates configuring and dual porting cabling assemblies.Controllers can be field up- Implementing dual computerlshared disc systems using graded from single port to dual port operation.Dual porting Is standard equipment and software. Dual porting also makes available for disc subsystems consisting of one to four drives redundant systems practical and economical for demanding or up to four mixed diskettes and disc drives. A standard applications. hardware and software dual port configuration is supported by Dual porting can be ordered Initially or added after the disc and Data General's Real-time Disc Operating System (RDOS). CONFIGURATIONS Each Cartridge DGIDisc Subsystem can be expanded to 40- Data General Cartridge DGIDIse Subsystems can be mixed megabytes in 10-megabyto Increments. Model 6045 Includes with diskette drives up to a total of four units Inany mix on the a 10-mogabyto cartridge disc drive, integrated power supply, same controller. Model 6050F adds a 10-megabyto disc drive controller,disc cartridge and cables. Models 6046,6047,and to a diskette subsystem.Diskette models 60306 or 60316 add 6048 offer similar complete subsystems of 20-, 30- and 40- two or one diskette drives,respectively,toa10-megabyto disc megabytes, respectively. Model 6050 lets users upgrade subsytem. A disc unit number switch lets users manually systems onsite In 10-megabyte Increments. Dual porting Is select master and slave drives, providing for selectable boot- implemented by adding Model 6051, strap device and flexible operation. PACKAGING Advanced packaging designed for Increased reliability makes an easily accessible drop-down unit.it is Integrated into the all parts of the subsys a ►ace j1gle,and minimizes the rack drive chassis, reducing the total rack space requirement to spaco disc drives occupy,,Th p*er supply subassembly Is 10112 Inches. Copyright @1975,1976,1977,1978 Data General Corporation, NOVA and ECLIPSE are registered trademarks of Data General Westboro, Massachusetts. Corparatlon All rights reserved. Printed In U.S.A. , AftIrQS is a..trademark of Data General Corporation. 012 335-2 SOFTWARE The Cartridge DG/Disc Subsystem Is supported by Data puters, ROOS has the additional capability of supporting General's multifunctional operating systems:Advanced Oper- ALGOL and Business BASIC high-level languages on all NOVA sting System (AOS) for ECLIPSE computers and Real-time and ECLIPSE computers, as well as advanced INFOS" file Disc Operating System(RDOS) for ECLIPSE and NOVA com- management and COBOL, RPG II, and Idea (Interactive data paters.Both AOS and ROOS support FORTRAN IV,optimizing entry access) software on Commercial ECLIPSE computers, FORTRAN 5 and Extended BASIC high-level languages, as The Cartridge DG/Disc Subsystem is an integral part of Data well as RJE80 (2780/3780 RJE emulation) software. In addl- General's Commercial Systems CS/40 models — systems tion, AOS and ROOS provide high-level facilities for con- that combine multiterminai Interactive COBOL with advanced current batch and real-time operations in a secure hardware/ CRT screen handling and powerful file system capabilities for software protected environment. AOS also has facilities for users In the business environment. simultaneous multilingual timesharing on ECLIPSE com- SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Cartridge Disc Subsystem Capacity [formatted data bytes]: Cylinders: 408 Sector, 512. Recording Density: 2200 BPi, Innermost track. Track, 6,144 (12 sectors). Recording Mods: Double frequency. Cylinder, 24,576 (48 sectors). Disc: IBM 2316-type cartridge. Surface, 2,506,752, Platter or cartridge, 5,013,504. Disc Enclosure Type: IBM 5440-type, Drive, 10,027,008, Start and Slop Time:30 sec.to operating speed,25 sec,to stop. Subsystem, 10mb to 40mb. Voltage Requirements:120 Vac,60 Hz;100 or 220 or 240 Vac, Recording Surfaces: 2 fixed, 2 removable. 50 Hz. Sectors: 12 per track, 24 or 48 per cylinder. Voltage Tolerance: +10%, -15%. Rotational Speed: 2.400 RPM. Frequency Tolerance:60 Hz, +1 Hz; 50 Hz; ±1 Hz_ Averago Latency: 12.5 msec, Primary Power Requirements (Maximum for 1-drive sub. Data Transfer Rate: 312,500 bytes/sec. t)p system while accessing]:100 Vac,60 Hz, 4.9 Amps; 120 Vac, Head Positioning Time: 60 Hz,5.7 Amps;220 Vac,60 Hz,2.6 Amps;240 Vac,50 Hz, Track-to-track,-8 msec. 2.4 Amps, Average, 38 msec. Power Dissipation (maximum]: 500 watts. Full stroke, 70 msec. Maximum Allowable Data Channel Latency: 12.5 microseconds, Track Density: 200 TPi. MECHANICAL v L Dimensions:10 megabyte cartridge disc drive:101h"(26.7 cm) one slot In any NOVA or ECLIPSE computer chassis.Supports `Y H x 19" (48 3 cm)W x 2931+" (75.6 cm) D, rack, mountable, up to four 10 megabytes discs,or up to four disc and diskette Weight: 144 lbs (65.4 kg) without sides and controller. drives in any combination. Controller:15"(38.i cm)square printed circuit board.Occupies Color: Royal blue with while trim. ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature Range: 601F (161C) to 90°F (32°C); operating; Relative HumidityRange: 20°x' to 80%, non-condensing, -40•F (-40•C) to 150'F (651C), storage. operating;'5°F to 95°F storage. - Temperature Gradient: 15°F/hr. (BXC/hr.)`mazimum. Attitude: 10,000 Yf(3,048 m) maximum.' The materials contained herein are summary in nature,subject to equipment and software are available in the applicable technical change, and intended for general information only. Details and manuals, available through local sales representatives, specification concerning the use and operation of Data General 005* 4 •4 ,DataGene1 �� Data Ger,aalcaporatW,Vk lorv,Mus hwcltz01581,&7) 1 DataGeneral DISKETTE SUBSYSTEM 6030,6031 PRODUCT BRIEF FEATURES • 315K bytes removable diskette moving head storage per drive • Uses small,low cost diskette recording media • Dual-and single-chassis models • Used with any Data General computer • Available as complete subsystem(controller and up to % f:g four drives) 1 • Can share controller with 10M byte cartridge disc subsystem • Compact 7"high chassis,complete with power supply • Data channel operation,sector transfer rate 31K bylosisec. • 260ms average head positioning time,83ms average latency • Comprehensive software support / DESCRIPTION Data General's Diskette Subsystem provides reliable low-cost whoel switch lots users select any unit as 0, 1, 2, or 3. The mass-storage capability for NOVA°' and ECLIPSE'"' compu- Diskette Subsystem uses the computer's Direct Memory ters. The Subsystem consists of a chassis containing power Access channel for high-speed data transfer.Typical Diskette supply and drives,controller for up to four drives,and cable uses Include software distribution and bootstrap loading, sot. It Is available in two-drive (Model 6030) and one-drive program and data exchange between Data General computer (Model 6031) versions. Expansion to four drives provides a systems,off-line storage In data collection and communica- maximum 1.2 megabyte on-line storage capacity. A thumb- tions systems,and mass storage for small stand-alone systema. DISKETTE MEDIA Each diskette has a formatted data storage capacity of 512 be disabled for data recording,then enabled to ensure data bytes per sector, or 4096 bytes per track.Total surface ca- Integrity.In operation,the diskette revolves at 360 RPM inside pacity for a single diskette is 315,392 bytes. Diskettes are Its protective envelope. Diskettes are industry-compatible supplied pro-formatted, but can by reformatted and verified with 32 hard sector address verification holes for reliable by diagnostic software.Each diskette envelope also has a write sector position detection. Protect feature that is initially enabled.Write protection can DATA CHANNEL TRANSFER Data transfer between diskette and computer memory is second for one sector and 25K bytes/second average over through the computer's Direct Memory Access data channel, several sequential sectors. The controller is quad-buffered, Up to eight sequential sectors can be transferred in one diskette so data channel requests can be up to 128 usec apart, revolution by a single command. Transfer rate is 31K bytes/ OPERATION When a road/write command is received, the head moves For multiple drive subsystems,seek commands can be sopa- toward the selected track. Head loading begins just prior to rately issued to each drive,and head positioning will be over- reaching the selected track to minimize head/surface contact lapped to increase throughput.When the drive is turned on, time and increase speed.Diskette timing holes provide sector or after loading a diskette, the drive automatically positions • position identification, and data transfer occurs. Several the head at track zero to facilitate the subsystem's use as a sectors can be transferred as required. If no activity occurs bootstrap device.The unit is ready for operation two to three for eight revolutions 0.3 seconds), the head automatically seconds after a diskette is loaded. lifts to minimize wear. Copyright (c60tt�oeneral Corporation, nn ... NOVA is'a registered trademark of Data General Corporation. All rights res .Printed In U.S.A. �.ho �, `ECLIPSE js a'trademark of Data General Corporation, �ts Y.1V4{ i Its ! �(r,'. �1�,d= U�ir,'`.i;i. ,Y',.l'�`!n .fsx<�:- i.+�� 012-190-1 s� n�' PACKAGING _ Data General's Diskette Subsystem is designed for operating diskette drive contains a spindle that accommodates one r ease, high reliability, and low maintenance cost. A chassis- diskette. Diskettes are easily inserted or removed via a slot mounted power supply with two-drive power capacity is in- and flip-up door at the drive front. Control lights provide cluded in each compact 7"high rack-mountable chassis. Up status Information, including write lockout, head at track 0 to four drives can be used in one Subsystem. Subsystem (calibration point),and drive ready. components, including all drives, are rack mounted. Each SOFTWARE Diskette storage is supported as an 1/0 device with a compat- The Real-time Disc Operating System (RDOS) is a modular, ible file structure under Data General's real-time disc operating device-independent multitask system which is both a powerful systems (ROOS and MRDOS). The diskette complements program development tool and a comprehensivefile-oriented, main disc storage,facilitating bootstrap operations,program real-time operating system.For real-time applications that do and data Interchange between systems,and file back-up for not require file management facilities,the Real-Time Operat- off-line storage. Diskette storage is supported as an 110 ing System (RTOS), a compatible subset of ROOS, provides device under Data General's Real-Time Operating System multitasking and high-speed service for peripherals.Programs (RTOS) for all normal disc storage purposes, may be developed under RDOS and executed under RDOS or RTOS, SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Drives Per Controller: Up to 4 for attachment to any Data Track Density:46 TPI. General computer. Recording Density:3268 BPI(innermost track). Diskette Capacity:315,392 formatted data bytes. Number of tracks:77. Sector Length:512 bytes per sector. Recording Mode:Double frequency, Preformatting: Media is preformatted and certified by Data Rotational Start-Up Time:2 sec.typicai. General software. Rotational Stop Time:Negifgibre. Recording Surfaces:One,removable. Control Functions:Unit select,power on,track 0 Indication, Type of Media Enclosure:Diskette envelope. ready indication,write protect indication. Rotational Speed:360 RPM. Power Requirements(Dual):2,7 amp run/4.0 amp start at 115 Number of Sectors.8 per track. VAC,60 Hz:1.5 amp run/2.1 amp start at 220 to 240 VAC,50 Hz. Data Transfer Rate:31,25K bytes/sec. Power Requirements (Single)4 1.35 amp run/2.0 amp start at Average Latency:83.33ms, 115 VAC,60 Hz:0,75 amp run/1.05 amp start at 220 to 240 VAC, Head Positioning Time: Track-lo-track,20ms:Average time, 50Hz. 260ms;Full stroke,770 ms, MECHANICAL Dimensions:7"H x 19"W x 231/2"D. Controller:Occupies one slot in any Data General computer. Weight:Dual unit,55 lbs. Single unit.40 lbs. Color:Royal blue with white trim. ENVIRONMENTAL _ TemperatureRange:50"F to 100°F operating;0°to120°Fstorage. Relative Humidity:20 o to 80%,non-condensing. Temperature Change Rate:120F/hour. Heat Generated:1000 BTU/hr,(dual),600 BTU/hr.(single)max. SALES AND SERVICE Soulhboro, Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485-9100, TWX (710) Tulsa OK, Blue Bell PA, Carnegie PA, Pittsburgh PA, Austin 390-0309, TLX 94.8460, Waltham MA, Scottsdale AZ, EI Segundo TX, Dallas TX, Houston TX, Salt Lake City UT, Falls Church VA, CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Santa Ana Renton WA, Menomonee Falls WI, Calgary Alta., Edmonton CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO, North Haven CT, Orlando Alta., North. Vancouver B.C„ Winnipeg Man., London Ont„ FL, Atlanta GA, Schaumburg IL, Indianapolis IN, Louisville KY, Mississauga Ont., Dollard-Des-Ormeaux P.O., Hull P.Q., and in Southfield M), Minneapolis MN, Clayton MO, Kansas City MO, Australia, Austria, Costa Rica, Denmark, England, Finland, Saddle Brook NJ,Albuquerque NM, Buffalo NY, Commack Long Franco, Greece, Hong Kong, Iran; Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Island NY, Ithaca NY, Now York NY, Rochester NY, Schenec- Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Scotland, Singa- tady NY, Syracuse NY, Greensboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH, pore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, West Germany The materials contained herein are summary in nature, subject General equipment and software aro available in the applicable to change, and intended for general Information only. Details technical manuals,available through local sales representatives. and specifications concerning the use and operation of Data taG�jw i t Or Data General Corporation Seuthlwro Mas3khusetts 0172,{617) t$5-910a DataGeneral ,;, �9:-11t 1 ,```S htf`illlC,:i JOfIS 13- d2 2 ;'f?ODUCT ORiF-F FEATURES • Four slots for asynchronous and synchronous line multiplexors • Fixed-mounted with front-end card insertion • Cables plug directly to backplane • Multiple chassis configurations Power-fail lecture • Remote AC power turn-on from computer • Automatic shutdown for abnormal temperature conditions '� '' "'- � F' •l • Simplified cabling fr- t. DESCRIPTION Data General's Communications Chassis Model 4251/4252 Model 4252 is used with NOVA computers. Multiple chassis holds up to four synchronous and/or asynchronous line mul- can be daisy-chalned to support large communications sys- tiplexors, Multiplexor types can be mixed and can occupy toms.The chassis' simplified cabling scheme and modular any slot in the chassis, letting users easily configure com- expansion capacity lel users easily configure a wide range munications systems with different type and different speed of communications systems. lines.Model 4251 isusedwilhECLIPSE"'andNOVecomputers; PACKAGING The communications chassis Is fixed-mounted in any Data puler/chassis interface is through the 110 bus or from a Data General 19" wide rack cabinet. It provides four slots with Control Unit in a Data General computer. Synchronous and front-end card insertion. Each slot has 144 open pins on the asynchronous multiplexors can be mixed in the chassis and back panel for communication cable connection.The com- occupy any slot. CABLING �^ A plastic backpnnol overlay simplifies cabling and communl- relief is provided for cables at the rear.Cables plug directly cations system reconfiguration.The coded overlay identifies into the chassis backplane and can be easily repositioned each group of pins by line,line type,and line address,Strain when multiplexor boards are rearranged. POWER -- -- The communications chassis has a built-in power supply.An the host Data General computer on AC power Inss, and automatic shutdown feature protects against fan malfunc- reset the host on loss of the +5 volt DC logic Supply. All tion or high ambient temperatures,A+5 volt DC control sig- power supply functions feature overvoltage and overcurrent nal provides r xrt . wer turn-on from the computer. protection. Power-lail electdn�A generate a high-priority interrupt to MULTIPLE CHASSIS CONFIGURATIONS — Up to four chassos can be daisy-chained when used with a alone non•DCU configured systems support two daisy-chained Data Control Unit(DCU),for support of up to 256 lines,Stand chassis,with up to 128 lines, +a CQPY,dpht Q'1075, Data Qen9rsl c,or�paTation r ..t EC I (P$t;1&;a latle�park of Data G[erjeral;Cor pritian r ys A r�'f� lht9 -SA, P ,r r - rq�grvod,Printad,iii SA,01 I ')1T4.; I N�VA�)`s a regfStere trAd m r`'o( Data!�engral. orp talion r � , MULTIPLEXORS SUPPORTED The SLM-2 Synchronous Line Multiplexor and the ALM-8 eight to sixteen asynchronous lines for local operations.Both and ALM-16 Asynchronous Line Multiplexors can be used the ALM-8 and ALM-16 operate at speeds to 9600 baud. The together in the communications chassis.The SLM-2 provides SLM-2, ALM-8, and ALM-16 can be used with the DCU/50, one or two synchronous communications lines that operate a dedicated communications controller which provides en- at data rates up to 56K baud.The ALM-8 is available in four hanced character processing and very high throughput with and eight asynchronous line versions, with full modem con- low computer overhead. trol for remote data communications. The ALM-16 provides CHASSIS SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Capacity:Four slots. VAC, 47.63Hz, 350 watts max. DC voltage +5V 5% n 22.5A; Power Requirements: Line voltage 92-138 VAC or 184.276 -+•12V 10%,'i 1.3A; —12V 5% . 2.5A. ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature Range:0 to x-55°C operating;,-350C to+70°C Relative Humidity Range:To 90%operating;to 95%storage., storage. Altitude Range:To 10,000'operating to 50,000'storage. N1I CHANICAL n r end Belden NEMA- . Dtttiemslaris;SSI,"H x 19"W x 20�'+ Cabling: 6'Fong, wired to chassis,other Weight-30 tbs. type 5.15P molded vinyl grounding plug, SALES AND SERVICE Southboro, Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485-9100, TWX (710) Tulsa OK, Blue Dell PA, Pittsburgh PA, Austin TX, Dallas TX, 390.0309,TLX 94.8460,Waltham MA, Scoltsdala A2, Et Segundo Houston TX, Salt Lake City UT, Falls Church VA, Renton WA, CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Santa Ana Calgary Alta., Edmonton Alta., North Vancouver B.C., Winnipeg CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO, North Haven CT, Orlando Man.,London Ont.,Mississauga Ont.,Dollard-Des-Ormesux P.O., FL, Atlanta GA, Schaumburg IL, Indianapolis IN, Louisville KY, Holt P.O., and in Australia, Austria, Costa Rica, Denmark, Southfield Mi, Minneapolis MN, Clayton MO, Kansas City MO, England, Finland, France, Hong Kong, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Saddle Brook NJ, Albuquerque NM, Buttato NY,Commack Lang Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Sect- island NY, Ithaca NY, New York NY, Rochester NY, Schenec- land, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, West Germany lady NY, Syracuse NY, Greensboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH, The materials contained herein are summary In nature, subject General equipment and software are available in the applicable to change, and Intended for general information only..Details technical manuals,available through local,sates representatives, and specifications concerning the use and operation of Data „ , ., .. - ,�;,,+ n�c>{ST• ,}r 1t„ s ,1,4C.;�: I.ts�lC!.l r .'3,.::..1'it t[+',�1� "etSt II ,s y7�1t722tl - a '„ 1k 1� 1/t �urr�•crt��n''. :.',rl;�!'iFtir}'rfi+' I r �� 7Nrhr +,(jy�ry n h c t 3 1I ��rerh P - DatiaGeneral o;�lrnuH�icr,r io:�s :,YST ia� i:0,' FEATURES • Eight-and sixteen-line versions • Up to 256 asynchronous lines per system • Full-or half-duplex operation 20 mA or EIA(RS232-C/CCITT V24)four-line plugable Interface modules —#—t Full character buffering • Programmable line characteristics • Programmable line speeds to 9600 baud + • Diagnostics and error detection facilitiesa .•* • Operates with Data Control Unit DCU150 for higher system throughput • Full software support DESCRIPTION The Asynchronous Line Multiplexor ALM-16 lets any Data plays,and Bell 103 data sets whenmanual answer only is used. General computer control multiple high- and low-speed The ALM-16 can be combined with the ALM-8 Asynchronous asynchronous communications lines. The ALM-16's rnodu- Line Multiplexor, the SLM-2 Synchronous Line Multiplexor, larity and flexibility let users easily and economically configure and the Data Control Unit DCU/50 to provide a complete, a wide range of small-to-large communications systems,with flexible,multiline Data General Communications Subsystem, low-to-high throughput, matching exact application require- These modular communications products let users easily ments.The ALM-16series Isavailable ineight-line and sixteen- configure systems for applications using Data General com- line versions, with EIA (RS232-C/CCITT V24) and 20 mA putors as front-end processors, message switchers, remote current loop interfaces. It is primarily used to interface local concentrators,and intelligent terminals. terminals like teletypewriters and Data General video dis-- OPERATION The ALAI-16 supports full-or half-duplex operations,it provides transmission rate is slowed. To prevent receiver overrun full character buffering on reception and transmission,giving conditions on Input,the.ALM-16 uses a priority chain to detect the program a full character Interval to process data before data line ready conditions. MODULAR SYSTEM DESIGN The ALM-16 is available in eight-line and sixteen-line versions, mounts on a 15-inch square printed circuit board that occupies with full-or half-duplex EIA(RS232-C/CCITT V24)and 20 mA any slot in the Model 4251J4252CommunicationsChassis.The interfaces. it can also be interfaced to a Bell 103 data set for ALM-16 is supported by a highly flexible and easily configured manual answor-only operations. Four-line EIA and 20 mA cabling scheme.When used with the DCUi50,up to 256 lines interface modules plug directly onto the multiplexor board are supported, and can be mixed on the same board. Each ALM-16 version PROGRAMMABLE LINE CHARACTERISTICS Each ALM-16asynchronousline can be programmed for parity data bits,with one or two stop bits. Each ALM-16 can run at type, colo level, number of stop bits, and line speed. Parity program-selectable speeds up to 9600 baud.Clock selection can be programmed on an individual line basis as odd,even, for each line is made from four source frequencies. This or none.When enabled,parity is automatically appended to programmability allows different terminal types to be mixed the transmit data word,and checked and stripped on the receive in the same communications system and lets users easily data word. Code levels can be programmed for 5, 6, 7,or 6 configure and reconfigure systems without hardware changes. DIAGNOSTICS AND ERROR DETECTION The ALM-IC,off-line diagnostic mode clears all internal registers including the line drivers and receivers,be tested under pro- and allows off-line testing, internal clocks are stopped but gram control, can be stopped under program control.Diagnostic data trans- Individual receivers on the ALM-16 asynchronous multiplexor fer is enabled,and initialization functions can also be executed in this made, aro able to detect parity errors, overrun conditions, and framing error (missing stop bits). The analog test loopback feature lets internal data paths, 00519 Copyright(g) 1975,Data General Corporation. All rights reserved,Printed In U.S.A 012 OQg172, i a, : DATA CONTROL UNIT DCU/50 The ALM-16 asynchronous multiplexor can operate on Data ALM-16 by performing all character-level operations and mul- Generalcomputers inconjunction with the DCU/50.The DCU/50 tlplexor control functions, while providing a data channel increases system throughput and enhances character pro- (DMA) path to the computer. cessing, reduces processor overhead, and simplifies imple- In addition,the DCU/50 can be programmed for specific appli- �• mentation of communications systems that use multiple high- cations that require peak character handling to 48,000 CPS, and low-speed asynchronous lines.The DCU/50 supports the unique protocols, and character processing functions. PACKAGING The ALM-16 Asynchronous Line Multiplexor mounts on a 15- card insertion.All cabling to modems and other devices plugs inch square printed circuit board that occupies one slot in directly onto the backplane.Cabling is simplified by a plastic the Model 4251/4252 four-slot communications chassis.The backplane overlay that labels communications line typos and chassis connects to a Data General computer via an external line numbers for each group of 1/0 pins. 50 twisted-pair 1/0 cable,and is fixed-mounted with front-end SOFTWARE SUPPORT Data General's communications software provides support treat communications hardware as multiple terminal devices, for the asynchronous multiplexor in both stand-alone and with individually selectable speeds for each line. DCU-integrated configurations. A complete teletypewriter- Data General's Real-time Disc Operating System(RDOS)Is a oriented protocol is supplied, and the software is flexible powerful,device-independent multitask system.RDOS is both enough to allow users to generate their own special purpose a program development tool and a comprehensive,file-oriented, line procedures. Calls at the user application program level real-time operating system.The Mapped Real-time Disc Oper, are concise, easy to use, and require no change if a stand- ating System(MRDOS)adds memory protection hardware to alone system is upgraded to one that includes a DCU. The. RDOS capabllities.'MRDOS lets any two system,programs hardware change Is transparent to the user program. run simultaneously and Independently. For real-time opera- tions that do not require file management facilities,the Real-Time In addition, the ALM-16 asynchronous multiplexor is sup- Operating System (RTOS), a compatible subset of'RDOS/ ported in the stand-alone configuration by Data General's MRDOS, provides multitasking and high-speed service for three compatible real-time operating systems.System drivers peripherals. SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL — — -----------__..—__ Transmission Type:Asynchronous. Character Length:5,6,7,or 8 bits,program-selectable;1 or 2 Number of Lines:Up to 256 per DCU/50 systemstop bits, program-selectable. Line Speed:Range from 5 to 9600 baud;program-selectable. Model 4260: 4-line, 20 mA current loop interface module. Line Type:Full-or half-duplex 8-line (Model 4258)and 16-line Model 4261:4-line EIA interface module. (Model 4257)versions. Power: 3.35 amps. Interface: EIA (RS232-C/CCITT V24) or 20 mA current loop. ENVIRONMENTAL -- --- – - Temperature Range:0 to +55°C operating; -35°C to +70°C Relative Humidity Range: to 90%operating;to 959.storage. storage, Altitude Range: to 10,000' operating; to 50,000' storage. REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION Data Control Unit DCU/50 Product Brief x+012-000175 Synchronous Line Multiplexor SLM-2 Product Brief 012-000171 Asynchronous Lino Multiplexor ALM-8 Product Brief-012.000173 Southboro, Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485-9100, TWX (710) 390-0309, TLX 94-8460, Waltham NIA, Scottsdale AZ, EI Segundo CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Santa Ana.CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO. North Haven CT, Orlando FL, Atlanta GA, Schaumburg IL, Indianapolis ,IN, Louisville KY, Southfield MI, Minneapolis MN, Clayton MO. Kansas City MO, Saddle Brook NJ. Albuquerque NM, Buffalo NY, Commack Long Island NY, Ithaca NY, New York NY, Rochester NY, Schenectady NY,Syra- cuso NY, Greensboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH,Tulsa OK. Blue Bell PA, Pittsburgh PA,Austin TX, Dallas TX, Houston TX, Sall Lak.o City UT, Falls Church VA, Renton WA, Calgary Alta., Edmonton Alta., North Vancouver B.C., Winnipeg Man., London Ont.; Missis- sauga Ont., Dollard-Des-Ormeaux P.O., Hull P.Q., and in Australia, Austria, Costa Rica. Denmark, England, Finland, France, Hong Kong, Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Scotland, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzorland, West Germany - The mnlurials contained herein are summaryin nature, subject to change, and intended for general information only, Details and spocitications concerning the use and operation of Data General equipment and sollware are available in the applicable IechnictU manuals, available through local sales representatives. Dala&.meral 0(15` ,fit -Ir Data Gincral Guporamx�4whlx�ra,�le�atlm�U Ql772 (617.)4�59100�.-"-!'- �.t!11 i:li' t -:[ty;z a 4DataGeneral :AAsHER PRINTER'S 0040, 6041 PRODUCT BRIEF FEATURES • True 300 bps operation • Switch selectable 30/60 cps • 96 characters upper and lower case • Optional character sets • Keyboard or receive-only models " f' • Numeric key pad �a • Top of Form Control • Up-lo-six-part forms • Fast, quiet operation • Lead screw drive mechanism • Three user-selectable character formats • User selectable printing rate: (30 or 60 cps) • EIA (RS232-C) interface • Four inch (10.1 cm) to 15-Inch (38.1 cm) forms ( ' • View mode operation • 40-character print buffer • Off-line operation • Standard typewriter keyboard • Logic on one easily replaceable printed circuit board • Small number of moving parts • Long-life reel-type ribbon ?, DESCRIPTION Data General's Model 6040 and 6041 DASHERVA printers are Additional features make Data General's DASHER printers fast, quiet, attractive, and reliable units for data Input and suitable for demanding data 110 and console applications, C output applications.Both offer 30 and 60 cps printing which is They have a user-selectable view mode feature that moves the switch selectable. The 6040 uses a standard typewriter key- printing head soanoperatorcan read the last character printed, board and has an off-line mode that enables it to be used as a The carriage is driven by a lead screw mechanism, insuring typewriter.The 6041 Is a receive-only terminal printer,without precise horizontal and vertical head registration. a keyboard. PACKAGING The Model 6040 and 6041 DASHER printers are packaged to access to the Interface, control circuits, and decoder, which Insure high reliability and easy maintenance. Their compon- are contained on a single, easily removeable printed circuit ents are grouped into five areas: electronics, ribbon drive, board,and the adjacent power supply.The reel drive and other print head and carriage drive, keyboard and operator control components are also easily accessible from the top of the unit. panel, and paper food. Doors on the side of the unit provide PRINTING SPEED Tho 6040 and 6041 DASHER printers are switch selectable for in, first-out (FIFO) buffer. Afer reaching the left margin, the either 300or 600 bps operation,When operating in the 300 bps print head begins printing at 60 cps and continues in this mode mode, printing takes place at 30 cps, During carriage returns, until the buffer has been emptied. In 600 bps mode, 60 cps is the print head Is disabled and characters accumulate in a first- maintained while printing. INTERFACING Th©6040and 6041 DASHER printers provide full Interface com- patability with ASCII devices using EIA(RS232-C)controllers. CHARACTER SETS The 96•charactor, upper- and lower case, English language Users can field-select upper-and lower-case, all upper caso, characlurset isstandard with the Model 6040and 6041 DASHER or 128-character formats. The 128-character format uses printers. In addition, 29 function codes may be optionally character codes normally used as control characters. added by using control character codes. • ` y Copyright-- 1976,1977 Data General Corporation,,. DASHER is a trademark of Data General Corporation, Southboro, Massachusetts. , All rights reserved, Printed In U.S.A. 41.lri 012-297-1 VIEW MODE The 6040 and 6041 DASHER printers have a user-selectable is within six spaces of Its far right position, it automatically view mode.If no data is received for two seconds, the printing moves to the left. The print head moves back to Its original head automatically moves six spaces to the right, giving the position and begins printing when a character is received. user a clearview of the previously printed text.If the print head �•' OPTIONS An 11-key numeric pad, optionally available on Model 6040 6040 and 6041 DASHER printers, provide for the convenient DASHER printers, simplifies operations including large selection of various lengths. The Top of Form Control can be amounts of numeric data entry. The key pad includes the activated either manually off-line, or may be operated on-line " numerals 0-9, and a period mark. by Issuing the appropriate ASCII control code. A Top of Form Control, optionally available on both Models SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Speed: 60 or 30 characters per second, user selectable. Line Feed: 33 ms. Character Set: 96 characters, upper and lower case. English Forms:Standard 6 holes-per-Inch pin feed forms. Minimum 4" language keyboard standard. Twenty-nine additional char- (10.1 cm) wide. Maximum 15" (38.1 cm) wide. acters optionally available. 128-code ASCII compatible. Multiple Forms:6-part forms, maximum. (Top sheet must be Character Style: 5 x 7 dot matrix, Inclined 10' to top right. paper.) Characters approximately 0.083"(2.1 mm)W;0.107"(2.7mm)H. Ribbon: 0.5" (1.2 cm) x 80 yards (73.1 m) mylar or 40 yards Columns: 132 (36.5 m) Ink Impregnated fabric, muitipass on each hall of Printing Density: 10 characters per Inch (horizontal): 6 char- ribbon, auto-reversing. acters per inch (vertical). Control Codes:015 CR (Carriage Return).012 LF (Line Feed). Character Buffer: 40 character capacity, first In, first out. 014 FF (Form Feed). 000 NULL and 177 DEL are uncondi- Keyboard: Standard typewriter layout; 3-level, capacitor Clonally Ignored. switched, electronically debounced, n-key rollover (ordered AC Voltages: 120V/60Hz (standard) 240V160Hz and 220V1 by rising keystroke). 50Hz. Others selected by transformer taps. Interface: EIA (RS232-C) Options: Numeric Key Pad, Top of Form Control, Paper Carriage Return: 500ms for full 15" (38.1 cm) return. Basket. MECHANICAL Dimensions: 33.5" (58 cm)H; 27.5" (69.8 cm)W; 21" (53.3 cm)D. Weight: 60 lbs (27 kg). ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature Range: 10' to +45'C operating; 5'C to +60'C storage. Relative Humidity Range:To 90% operating;to 95% storage. Altitude Range: To 10,000' (3,048 m) operating; to 50,000' (15,240 rn) storage. REFERENCE DOCUMENTATION 015.051 6040 Series Terminal Printer Technical Manual 015-052 6040 Series Field Service Manual The materials contained heroin are summary In nature, subject General equipment and software are available in the applicable to change,and Intended for general information only. Details technical manuals, available through local sales representa and specifications concerning the use and operation of Data tives. X05,22 • L DataGener(jl, DalaCwnrralCnrlxxnikAi,11i5tboro.Massuchuselt%01581,(617)3(i6.89)I DataGeneyal SERIAL MATRIX PRINTERS 4034C, 4034D PRODUCT;BRIEF FEATURES • 165 characters/second • Up to 132 columns • Dot matrix characters • Low maintenance costs • Convenient operator controls • Software supported DESCRIPTION _ Data General's 4034C and 4034D serial matrix printers are eco-, printing speed. They differ primarily in the structure of the nomical, hardcopy output devices for Data General computers. printing matrix that forms Individual characters. Both printers Both models have a 63-character ASCII set, a 132-character are fully supported by Data General's extensive software Ii. Maximum line length, and 165 character/second maximum braxy, including high-level language processors. PRINTING SPEED - Both the 40340 and the 4034D typically print 165 characters settling. On full lines this time is approximately 200 msec. per second, 10 characters per Inch, and up to 132 characters Both printers are equipped to print whole lines composed of per line, Line printing speed is approximately 60 lines per expanded characters that are twice as wide as regular char- minule on full 132-character lines, and 200 lines per minute on aclers. With expanded characters, printing speed, characters short lines, To keep the printer at maximum speeds, a line per line, and character density are half that of regular char- usually Is transferred from the 4034 line printer control to the acters. 132•characlor buffer in the printer during print head return and OUTPUT Both sorml'matrix printers have 63 ASCII characters (62 print good on both printers, The resolution of printed characters on characters plus space) available to the program. Characters the, 4034D printer is distinctly superior, due to the 9 x 7 dot are formed In a 5 x 7 dol matrix (model 4034C) or 9 x 7 dot matrix it uses. Bd"'h printers use 11-inch fanfold form paper up matrix (model 4034D). Characters are printed left to right, by to 14'/e" wide. An original and four legible copies can be pro. activating solenoids which print appropriate dots, one column duced, For ribbon replacement, Data General Corporation at a time. Quality and alignment of typed output is extremely part =119000056 is available. PACKAGING Both serial matrix printers are packaged for reliability and ease cedures are simple and easy to perform, and usually require of servicing. The print head mechanism is rugged and ensures minimum time. An optional stand, model 4034E, is available to precise align�o ty etrix printing dots. Maintenance pro make the tabletop unit into a free-standing unit. 4Copyr{p6t;. 19 3t 1974,X975, Da a+t3enes, l,C,or�y(�'`a,ion -rvri'�'12�¢Kx+Y`F°X"'A iv'R A'�'�v� T t h s }ter N 5 •r 1 i� } 0 , i, Pfi�tjAd In �,;+� +., , '` 't �' � F r• } °�1�,d+"$r,xz t ,,.,k, e,i�v V, �xk tot :i�.��n?s '_�.n,te `{ '� �"'4 .,r,� S'r, � L I4 'moi INTERFACING Each serial matrix printer uses a model 4034 line printer con- cupies one slot in any Data General computer chassis. Data trol, mounted on a 15-inch square subassembly board that oc- transfers are character serial, through the 1/0 facility. CONTROLS Easy to read operator controls are located on the front panel lamps signal printer-head-beyond-margin and paper out. Man- of both serial matrix printers. Controls includo switches for List controls include a paper advance knob, forms thickness on/off, top of form, select, and forms override. indicator control, and end of form switch. SOFTWARE Each serial matrix printer is supported under Data General's the Real-Time Operating System (RTOS), a compatible subset operating systems. The Real-time Disc Operating System of RDOS, provides multitasking and high-speed service for (RDOS) is n modular, device-independent multitask system peripherals. For program development in non disc-based sys- which is both a powerful program development tool and a com- tems, the Stand-alone Operating System (SOS), a compatible prehonsive file-oriented, real-time operating system, For real- subset of RDOS, allows users to edit, assemblo,or execute pro- time applications that do not require file management facilities, grams stored on paper tape, or magnotic/cassette tape. SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Print Rata, 165 characters/sbcond'. Paper Slew Speed: 4.4 inches/second. Number of Characters: 63 ASCII; LF, CR, FF, VT, BELL, SO Paper Type: Multiple copy, up to five parts, thickness 0.040" control characters standard. max.. Characters Per line: 132 characters', Paper Dimensions: Standard fanfold, edge-punched paper, up Character Spacing: 10 characters/Inch horizontal'; 6 lines/inch to W/o" wide. vertical Ribbon: V fabric on 3" diameter spools. Typo and Size oL•Characters:ASCIi, open Gothic print charac- Power Requirements: 117 volts ('-100/o), 60Hz or 230 volts ter a with printed symbols typically 0.080" widox,0.100" high. ( ' 10%), 50Hz. Character Structure: 5 x 7 dot matrix (model 4034C), 9 x 7 dot matrix= (model 403D). Refers to regular character sot; halve figure for oxpnnded character set. Buffer: 132 characters. 'Refers to regutar character set; double figure for expanded character set. Line Advance Time: 80 msec. Carriage Return:200 msec, from column 132. MECHANICAL Dimensions: 101/+"H x 28"W x 181/."D. Data Connections: 10' signal cable supplied with mnting con- Weight: 155 lbs, nector. Power Cable: 10' AC line cord, ENVIRONMENTAL Tomperature Range: 40 to 100`F operating; 0` to 140"F stor- Relative Humidity,Range: 50A) to 90o, non-condensing, opera- age, ting; to 35%, non-condensing storage. SALES AND SERVICE Southboro. Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485-9100, TWX (710) OR, Blue Bell PA, Pittsburgh PA, Austin TX, Dallas TX, Hous- 390.0300, TLX 94-8460, Waltham MA, Scottsdale AZ, El ton TX, Salt Lake City UT, Fails Church VA, Renton WA, Segundo CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Calgary Alta„ Edmonton Alla., North Vancouver i3.C., Winni- Santa Ana CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO, North Haven peg Man., London Ont., Mississauga Ont., Dollard-Des- CT, Orlando FL, Atlanta GA. Peoria IL, Schaumburg IL, In- Ormeaux P,Q., Hull P.O., and in Australia, Austria, Belgium, dianapolis IN, Louisville KY, Southfield MI, Minneapolis MN, Costa Rica, Denmark; England, Finland, France, Hong Kong, Clayton MO. Kansas City MO, Saddle Brook NJ, Albuquerque Iran, Israel,Italy,Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, Philip- NM, Bullato NY, Commack Long Island NY, Ithaca NY, Now pines, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Scotland, Singapore, Spain, York NY, Rochester NY, Schenectady NY, Syracuse NY, Sweden, Switzerland, West Germany Greensboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH, Tulsa OK, Portland The materials contained herein are summary,in nature, sub- of Data General equipment and software are available in the Jett to change, and intended for general information only, applicable technical manuals, available through local sales Details and specifications concerning the use and operation representatives. } +( �1r o ► l' .. MArlk�l1i! k3��{r�2 i �etrr a. t:tx t s I`tri rf t t 't,t tttaFti 7f"'2�' j �� a_ PGS r �rlDat �G i Coipora��^^° -,+tiboto�i laysac{tusc:ts 017�2 (Ia17} 3$5=9tnfl ' A , i DataGeneral FEATURES • Wide range of storage capacities • Sturdy steel construction • Easy access to equipment • Superior air circulation _. • Centralized electrical connections • Antitlp construction `, ° • Charcoal and white finish • Color-coordinated filler panels supplied C _ DESCRIPTION Data General 1012 series cabinets are sturdy, economical centralized electrical connections, powerful ventilation systems, enclosures for storage of central processors, peripherals and antitip_construction, and 19-inch wide mounting bays. The associated hardware. All cabinets feature steel construction, cabinets differ primarily in storage capacity. STORAGE CAPACITY Cabinets In the 1012 series are available in several sizes, 563e" cabinet are available. Smaller cabinets, like the 1012J, offering a wide selection of storage capacities. For example, provide an economical solution for,,storage, of items that.fit a 1012F singlo-bay cabinet has 563e" of usable space. For into less than 23"vertical space: larger systems, two-, three, and lour-bay versions' of the CONSTRUCTION All 1012 series cabinets are designed"around a 14-gaugo,,cold- entirely through the base to the floor.`.The frame is protected rolled steel frame, with horizontally reinforced sides, base and by.structurally reinforced side panels, top, and doors. All are top. For additional strength, vertical frame members extend designed to minimize the effects of shock and vibration. EQUIPMENT ACCESS Both side panels and doors can be removed for,quick access signed to swing free of the frame, for maximum exposure of to equipment mounted In the cabinet. Panels lift, rather than lhe,equipment. unscrew from the frame mounts. Doors are hinged "and de- AIR e AIR CIRCULATION A compact centrifugal blower provides maximum delivery of CFM of filtered air_at "0" static pressure. A louvered top, air whilo'occupying minimum spaco. The blower,is 5'/2' high, panbl,on each cabinet lets"air circulate freely,. and mounts in the bottom of each cabinet bay: It delivers 425' ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS " An AC power strip centralizes electrical connections in one,:_ 5-15P,,.15-amp plug through which power"is"distributed to cab- convenient location. The power strip is mounted :vertically; ,, inet-lmounted;equipment. A,six-foot cable is.supplied with each in the back corner of each cabinet bay. It connects to a NEMA cabinet bay, r "1 Copyrl�.' ght �i974-1975 Data GeneralrCorporat(on "r -'��,* "2d ��t-^ �� i��•�x(r'lh ;:reserved = rintod In„U S A� 2 ";'`�`�3 i��(( I�.t� T” � � .{_... � %1"(a 4x{ 'T<'f•� soo., i :� �t 1 4y rs ANTITIP CONSTRUCTION— To provide positive antitip support, aluminum legs mount di- adjustable In height to compensate for cabinet casters (tour rectly to the outside of 1012F-J cabinel3. Leveling jacks are per bay). FiLLER PANELS �� � ' Each cabinet comes equipped with enough filler panels to They attach to the cabinet frame through quarter-turn screws, cover all openings unoccupied by rack-mounted equipment. Replacement filler panels are available in heights of 17/,", The filler panels are 19" wide, steel, and color-coordinated. 31/7," 5'/4," 87/4," and 10'17" SPECIFiCATIO_NS MECHANICAL Blower: One per bay, centrifugal operation, delivers 425 CFM Frame: 14-gauge, cold-rolled steel construction, with ?i2' air at "0" static pressure. 5'/7"H x 19"W. Exhausts ver- ing holes drilled at standard EEA spacing (Va", '/e", 1/7" re- tically, requiring 3'/7" clear space above for proper air distri- pealed centers). Distance between holes, 18?3;' each bay, bution. Equipped with built-in fuse and ground terminal block. Casters: Heavy-duty, rubber tread, four swivel casters,per bay. Side panels: Two per cabinet, 30"W x /s"-thick steel, lift-off, unlouvered panels. Note: shipping screw must be removed Finish: All painted parts protected by phosphate coating. The before panels can be removed. frame Is finished in charcoal gray color. Side panels and top Top panel: One per bay, steel, louvered for proper air circu- are white. iation, Antitlp Construction: Aluminum antitip logs mounted directly Doors: One par bay, 19"W, steel, structurally reinforced, un- to side of frame, and built-in leveling jacks. louvered. Equipped With flush handles, pressure-sensitive latch. Mounts on semi-concealed lift-off hinges. Dimensions/Weight: 1012F 1012G 1012H 10121 10121 Outside width 23)i;' 45%"_ _ 6751"� Outsido depth30"— 30" 30" 30'f 30" Outside height _______. _ __ �— (wlcasters) 7011'6" 70'(a 70%," 70%," 37?{," Usable width -- ^--'— -- - (per bay) 19`, 19" 19" 19'f T 1911 Usable depth (per bay) __ _ 29%" 29::" 29,'a'f 291/ r 2g,a, Usable height 7 __---------- — (per _ bay) 583,8" 56?e" 56?a,, 227/11 No. 19" bays 1 2 3 4 - Front clearance — - - required 29%" 29j" 29'/. 291,x„ 29'ra" Back clearance required 19" _ 19" 191f _ 191f 19" Weight 225 ib. �^ 450 Ib. 675 Ib. 900 Ib, 152 lb. ' AntlUp legs extend an additional 12" in front of cabinet. ' Dlrnensions indicate space remaining above 5,1,j" blower; leave 3'•2" minimum above blower for proper air circulation. (Consult technical reference on Individual pieces of equipment for exact space required.) ELECTRICAL Power Connections: Six-fool line cord provided to NEMA 5-15P �5-outlet power strip (model 1012J) or 10-outlet power strip Plug mounted in base of each bay. Connects, in each bay, to (models 1012F-10121). SALES AND SERVICE Southboro, Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485-9100, TWX (710) OR, Blue Bell PA, Pittsburgh PA, Austin TX, Dallas TX, Hous- 390-0309, TLX 94.8460, Waltham MA, Scottsdale AZ,' El ton TX, Salt Lake City UT, Fails Church VA, Renton WA, Segundo CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Calgary Alta., Edmonton Alta., North Vancouver B.C., Winni Santa Ana CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO, North Haven peg Man., London Ont., Mississauga Ont., Dollard-Des- CT, Orlando FL, Atlanta GA, Peoria IL, Schaumburg IL, In- Orrneaux P.O., Hull P,O., and in Australia, Austria, Belgium, diannpolis IN, Louisville KY, Southfield MI, Minneapolis MN, Costa Rica, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Hong Kong, Clayton MO, Kansas City MO, Saddle Brook NJ, Albuquerque Iran, Israel, Italy,Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Nethortands„Phllip- NM, Buffato NY, Commack tong Island NY, Ithaca NY, New pines, Portugal, Puerio Rico, Scotland, Singapore, Spain, York NY, Rochester NY, Schenectady' NY, Syracuse NY, Sweden, Switzerland, West Germany, Gtoonsboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH, Tulsa OK, Portland The nlatorials contained herein are summary in nature, sub- of Data General equipment and software are available in the joct to change, and intended for general' information only.' applicable technical manuals; available through local sales Dotaiis.and specifications concerning the use and operation representatives. y t ,.:r,���Ft : f �:i � t . i a rr ���Z�XE✓; 1fcj- olrat S thb4rsMBrSC3ues0!72,(617} r485 91001 .� c a:` IrDataGeneyal FEATURES • Mapped and unmapped foreground/background memory management with background checkpointing and Indepen- dent system and useraroas In mapped systems • Powerful conventional and multilevel file management capabilities including disc partitioning and user file sharing • Buffered and unbuffered Input/output with disc buffering of output(spooling)and complete device Independence • Interactive operator communication through a Command RDOS Line Interpreter(CLI)control of real-time and batch operations • Multitasking monitor with a 256-priority-level hierarchy and Interactive task communications software • Intertask communication/synchronization and asynchro- SINGLE COMPATIBLE MULTITASK nous task competition for systems resources PROGRAM OPERATING PROGRAM • User program segmentation by swaps,chains and a multi- EXECUTION SYSTEMS EXECUTION node overlay facility with up to 128 overlay areas peruser program • Operator-or-real-time-clock-controlled scheduling • Complete user interrupt and power-fall/autorestart capability DOS as RTOS C • Dual-processor/shared-disc and multiprocessor communl- NON-DISC cations support SYSTEMS • Easy system generation with optional automatic system tuning capability • Fully compatible with Data General Real-Time Operating System(RTOS)and diskette-based Disc Operating System (DOS) • High-level language and extensive utility support DESCRIPTION Data General Real-lime Disc Operating System (RDOS) soft- cries from 32K bytes to 512K bytes In size. RDOS provides ware supports both real-time and batch operations In a flexible mapped or unmapped foreground/background memory man- user•orlented environment; RDOS controls a wide variety of agement of single-task and multitasked operations. RDOS Data General NOVAr�) and ECLIPSE& configurations. It all I- handles all types of computational, communications, instru- clently manages critical system resources, including mem- mentation and control,and data systems applications. FOREGROUND/BACKGROUND PROCESSING RDOS supports both single program and foreground/back- use the background address space. For example, a data ground program processing. In foreground lbackground pro- acquisition program running in the foreground can dynam- cossing, two independent programs run simultaneously with ically checkpoint a program development utility operating In either the foreground address space having priority or both the background, replace the utility with a data reduction addross spaces sharing resources equally.RDOS controls and program loaded from disc storage, and automatically restore allocates system resources to the address spaces as required. the background address space to Its original status when the Multiple system tasks for parallel device operation, system data reduction program finishes. overlays and dynamic system control ensure efficient Utilizing Data General memory management hardware, RDOS operation. protects system and user address space and peripherals from Mapped RDOS combines with memory management hard- unscheduled events that might otherwise disrupt system ware to dynamically allocate address space separately to operation, RDOS provides interprogram calls that.let pro. RDOS, one or two user areas and an overlay/buffer area, if tected address areas access the buffer area to retrieve regl-!red. Mapped ROOS includes a background check- common data. - pointing capability that allows the foreground to temporarily Copyright Cc)1974,1975,1976,1977,Data General Corporation, INFOS and DASHER are trademarks of 00527 521 Westboro, Massachusetts. Data General Corporation. v All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. ECLIPSE and NOVA are registered trademarks of Data General Corporation. 0127100.3 FILE MANAGEMENT ROOS ensures file Integrity by controlling all Input/output to support multi-user operations such as Extended BASIC. operations to system peripherals.The highly flexible disc file Mapped ROOS on commercial ECLIPSE systems also fully system supports sequential, random and contiguous file supports the iNFOS""data-base-oriented file management organizations. RDOS also allows disc partitioning, subdirec- system,which adds sophisticated multilevel keyed access to tory creation,link entries for fife sharing and privileged access the other ROOS file management capabilities, INPUT/OUTPUT ROOS efficiently handles input/output operations through spools output to disc for slow peripherals. This frees user common binary and ASCII access methods. ROOS buffers programs to continue processing. 1/0 operations in a dynamic system buffer pool that blocks and debiocks data transfers, ROOS provides direct block 110 ROOS treats each peripheral device as a symbolic name.This transfers for discs and free-format tape 1/0 that gives users ensures complete device Independence. the speed needed for real-time applications. ROOS also OPERATOR COMMUNICATIONS ROOS provides a powerful Command Line Interpreter (CLi) memory whenever the system (s Idle.Typical CLI commands for user/system communication. CLI resides In either the Include APPEND, 'CREATE,'DELETE, EDIT, LINK, PRINT, foreground or background In mapped systems and in the back- PUNCH,SAVE and TYPE:One command, BATCH, allows the ground area in unmapped systems.It accepts commands from user to define a batch'Job stream.The user can then direct the console or command files and performs certain house- operations with an easily learned Job control language com- keeping chores for the user. The system restores the CLI to patible with CLi commands. MULTITASKING ROOS controls multitasking environments in which multiple service, A 256-level priority structure provides great flexibility execution paths perform functions asynchronously,The Task in handling real-time events while providing high system Scheduler maintains information about each task in a Task throughput. Control Block. At any given moment, tasks are ready, exe- An Operator Communications (OPCOM) package lets op- cuting, suspended or dormant. ROOS maintains a queue of erators monitor and control the task environment and pri- ready and suspended tasks and schedules tasks based on orities from the console. Processor, memory and peripheral use. When more than one , task becomes ready,ROOS gives the highest priority task first INTERTASK COMMUNICATION RDOS-controlled tasks communicate with one another via an activities.The mechanism can synchronize task execution by Intertask message mechanism that coordinates parallel suspending one task until a message has'been passed. PROGRAM SEGMENTATION ROOS swaps,chains and overlays Increase memory efficiency load and execute concurrently. ROOS stores these overlays and utilization. With swaps, one program suspends itself in memory-image format to reduce read-in time. This multi- while ROOS brings In another for execution. With chains, node overlay facility provides up to 128 overlay areas per user ROOS divides large programs Into smaller, serially executing. program.In mapped systems,users may optionally lock over- se( ,Vnents. ver-secynents.This makes program size independent of available lays in the overlay/buffer area for maximum execution speed, memory. With ove%:ays, ROOS lets many disc-resident tasks INTERRUPTS ROOS utilizes a vector-driven device Interrupt table to service data channel transfers and processor conditions can cause an Interrupts. The table points to an Interrupt routine which will interrupt, identify and service the specific interrupt. Peripheral devices, DUAL PROCESSOR/SHARED DISC AND MULTIPROCESSOR SUPPORT ROOS gives dual processor/shared disc user common access critical processes between them to improve response time. to disc-stored programs and data:'Dual processor access to ROOS also supports a Multiprocessor Communications common storage lets one system back up another and assume Adapter that connects multiple Data 'General computers control of critical processes if the first system accidentally or through the high-speed data channel and allows a network of purposely goes down. Dual processor systems also can share Data General processors to function efficientlyand effectively, col 1 tiA,W ; SYSTEM CUSTOMIZING RDOS modularity lets users tailor systems to Individual appli- capability that lets the operating system automatically store cation requirements during system generation. Each disc can and feedback Information on the best resource alignment; actually contain several such tailored operating systems so tuning will be accomplished during each regeneration of that a simple bootstrap program can easily change the con- ROOS, figuration's capabilities. The system also contains a tuning COMPATIBILITY Data General supplies other compatible operating systems, diskette-based Disc Operating System (DOS). Conversely, a Sof twaredeveloped under ROOS runs on other configurations DOS and RTOS configuration can be expanded without re- using the Real-Time Operating System (RTOS) and the programming to operate under ROOS. LANGUAGE PROCESSORS ROOS supports single- and multi-user Extended BASIC, systems also supports Data General ANSI74 COBOL and iBM Business BASIC, Extended FORTRAN iV, FORTRAN 5, DOS-compatible RPG 11, ALGOL, Data General's System Programming Language All user programs, Independent of language, have the same (DGIL) and the Macro Assembler. Both FORTRAN versions ROOS Interface to disc files and peripherals. This lets pro. have ISA-Workshop extensions. They permit data access grams written In one language process data collected by through sensor 110 subsystems, random record and direct programs written In another language. These programs can disc block Input/output,and bit/string manipulations needed run on the same or compatible systems. In real-time applications. ROOS on commercial ECLIPSE UTILITIES LIBRARY RDOS provides many utilities Including a Relocatablo Loader, Monitor, Overlay Loader, Batch Job Slroam processor and Extended Assembler, Editors, (Single and multiterminai text, System Generation Program. Library File, Octal, and Disc), Symbolic Debugger, Task MINIMUM EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS _ ROOS runs on any Data General computer with a minimum head discs, multiple DASHERC7 printers or displays, mag. of 32K bytes (16K words)of memory, a real-time clock, telo- notic tape units, high-speed paper tape equipment, card typewriter or CRT and any one of several avaiiable discs, readers, line printers, plotters, communications controllers Mapped ROOS requires a memory management unit and and sensor 110 subsystems, additional memory. ROOS also supports fixed and moving SALES AND SERVICE NORTH AMERICAN OFFICES: Westboro, Massachusetts, INTERNATIONAL OFFICES: ARGENTINA: Buenos Aires; 01581, (617) 366.8911 Headquarters. And AL: Birmingham; AUSTRALIA: Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne, New Castle, AZ:Phoenix,Tucson;CA:EI Segundo,Palo Alto,Paramount, Perth, Sydney; AUSTRIA: Vienna; BELGIUM: Brussels; Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Ana, Santa BRAZIL: Sao Paulo; COLUMBIA: Bogata; COSTA RICA: San Barbara, Van Nuys, Woodland Hills; CO: Engelwood; CT: Jose; DENMARK: Copenhagen; ECUADOR: Quito; EGYPT: North Branford: FL: Ft. Lauderdale, Orlando, Tampa; GA Cairo;FINLAND: Helsinki;FRANCE:Paris,Le Plessis Robin- Atlanta; ID: Boise; IL: Peoria, Schaumburg; IN: Indianapolis; sons, Lyon; GERMANY: Dusseldorf, Eschborn, Fliderstadt, KY: Louisville; LA: Baton Rouge; MA: Cambridge, Spring- Hamburg,Munich,Ratigen,GREECE:Athens;HONG KONG; field, Wellesley, Worcester; MD: Baltimore; MI: Southfield; IRAN: Teheran; ISRAEL: Tel Aviv; ITALY: Milan, Rome, MN:Minneapolis;MO: Kansas City,St. Louis; NC:Charlotte, JAPAN;Tokyo;KOREA:Seoul;KUWAIT:Kuwait City; LYBIA: Greensboro; NH: Nashua; NJ:Cherry Hili,Wayne; NM: Albu- Tripoli; MALAYSiA: Kuala Lumpur; MEXICO. Mexico City; querque;NV:Las Vegas: NY: Buffalo, Latham, Melville, Now NETHERLANDS: Rijswijk, NEW ZEALAND: Welling on; York City, Newfield, Rochester, Syracuse; OH: Columbus, PERU: Lima; PHiLLIPiNES: Makati, Metro, Marrlla; PORTU- Dayton,Euclid;OK;Oklahoma City,Tulsa;OR;Portland; PA: GAL: Lisbon; PUERTO RICO: Hato Roy; SAUDI ARABIA: Blue Bell, Carnogle; RI: Albion, Rumford; TN: Knoxville, Riyadh:SINGAPORE:Sri Lanka;SOUTH AFRICA: Johannes- Memphis;TX;Austin,Dallas,EI Paso,Houston;UT:Salt Lake burg, Pretoria; SPAIN; Barcelona, Bilbao, San Sebastian, City; VA: Hampton, McLean, Norfolk, Richmond, Salem; Valencia;SWEDEN:Gothenborg,Malmo,Stockholm;SWiTZ- WA: Kirkland; WI: Milwaukee; CANADA: Calgary, Alberta; ERLAND: Lausanne, Zurich; TAIWAN: Taipei; THAILAND; Edmonton, Alberta; Richmond, B,C,; Ottawa, Ontario; Bangkok;TURKEY:Ankara;UNITED KINGDOM:Birmingham; Toronto, Ontario; St. Laurent (Montreal), Quebec. London; Manchester;Glasgow,Scotland;URUGUAY, Monte- video; USSR. The materials contained herein are summary in nature,subject to equipment and software are aviafabie In the applicable technical change, and intended for general information only. Details and manuals, available through local sales representatives, specifications concerning the use and operation of Data General 1 y 4 . . •'i�',C, A :.i it S. .0 •.t,.n.,uu,e�.,:;d 1,t1'y1v ava �,n,�a i.�,rl e.t;;.{ .1 �,�����`.;:, 4 ,. � ., ._ � �.. ,, , �' �� � r DataGeneral MAGNETIC TAPE SUBSYSTEM 6020 SERIES PRODUCT BRIEF FEATURES • Self-loading vacuum column • High-speed in-column rewind • IBM head guide spacing • Single-capstan drive • Industry-compatible 7- and 9-track • 751ps tape speed f • Read-after-write and write de-skewing • Unit select • Software supported i DESCRIPTION Data General's industry-compatible magnetic tape subsystem.., and allows users greater flexibility to take advantage of Data provides low-cost, serial access storage for Data General General's extensive software library. All transports feature computers. It can be used extensively in computational, in- self-loading vacuum columns designed to protect tape-stored strumentation and control, data processing and communica- data from damage. Transports process tape at 75 fps, and tions applications. The subsystem includes control for up to record and read'data at 800 bpi (9-track), or 556 bpi and 800 eight transports, 7-track and/or 9-track. Using multiple trans- bpi (7-track). ports significantly increases total 'system storage capacity STORAGE CAPACITY All 6020 series magnetic tape transports take 10'/a-inch reels and 9-track transports can store over 20 million characters. with 2400 loot of half-Inch tape. At 800 bpi, both the 7-track TRANSFER RATE All transports process tape at 751ps. Data transfer rate is TransferIs via the Direct Memory Access data channel of 60,000 characters (30,000 16-bit words) per second, at 800 bpi, any Data General computer: PACKAGING Data General's magnetic tape transports are designed and Three read thresholds allow reading damaged tapes,or tapes built for reliability and ease of operation. High-density mod- with poor signal quality. Thumbwheel-controlled unit select ular packaging minimizes potentially trouble-prone intercon- lets operators quickly assign and change transport identities nections, it also expedites maintenance by placing most in multiple-unit systems. Tape interchangeability Is maintained • components onuickly-serviceable subassemblies. The self- by a single-capstan drive, IBM-compatible head guide spacing, loading vacuum�b ` '(lies tape gently by maintaining and electronic de-skow. Straight-line tape threading and a sirn- correct tension.`'A W u m`tape cleaner increases reading plified, accessible control panel enhance operator convon- accuracy, power loss protection, write lockout, and a read- ience. after-writo head minimize accidental tape damage or data loss p OQ531 t z Copyrigf t 0.1974 1975 Data General Cor oratio �i aoGthboro, Messachusetta �= ' �- 0 E1II.rights (e001Ved�cFrinte�,i� U� A ) id'7irt( lF. {a 1fF ,y i�ftZ�r�4Act � s� s - »ref*�tJ�f e �ti � 01 n96 2-' ,}j'�' INTERFACING The subsystem includes a magnetic tape control for up to and/or 9-track model 6023) can be added to models 6020 eight transports. Model 6020 contains the control and a and 6021. Additional transports (7-track model 6024, and/or 7-track transport. Model 6021 contains the control and a 9- 9-track model 6025) can be added to models 40301-W. track transport. Additional transports (7-track model 6022, SOFTWARE The magnetic tape subsystem is supported by Data General's facilities, the Real-Time Operating System (RTOS), a com- operating systems. The Real-time Disc Operating System patible subset of ROOS, provides multitasking and high-speed (RDOS) is a modular, device-independent multitask system. service for peripherals. For program development in non disc- ROOS is both a powerful program development tool and a based systems, the Stand-alone Operating System (SOS), a comprehensive file-oriented, real-time operating system. For compatible subset of ROOS, allows users to edit, assemble, real-time applications that do not require file management or execute programs stored on magnetic cassette tape. SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL Tape Speed: 751ps Stallc Skew: 100 microinchos, max, (READ); electronic'skew Data Density: 800 bpi (9-track 6021 and 6023); 556 or 800 bpi compensation supplied for NRZI (WRITE). (7-track 6020 and 6022), Tape (Computer Grade): 0.5", 1.5 mil mylar. start and Stop Time:Smsec (± 10%). Reel Size: up to 101/2", Speed Variation: ± 1 4% max, total. Recording Mode: NRZI IBM compatible. Start/Stop Distance: 0,187 (10,019) In. Head Type: Dual gap. Rewind Speed:2001ps nominal. Power Requirements: 115/230 VAC (-{-100/0, —200/o), 50/60Hz, Dynamic Skew:75 microinchos, max, single phase, 900 watts maximum. Heat Generated: 3481 BTU/hr max. MECHANICAL Dimensions: 19"W x 24'/7"H x 19"D, from mounting surface. Weight: 150 lbs. (Control fits on a 15" square printed circuit board and occu- Mounting: Standard 19" rack. plus one computer slot.) Signal Cable: 10' long. ENVIRONMENTAL Temperature Range: 60' to 90'17 room (60' to 110'F cabinet); Relative Humidity Range:20% to 80%, non-condensing, oper- -10' to 160'F storage. ating; 15% to 95%, non-condensing, storage. Altitude Range:to 10,000 feet. SALES AND SERVICE Southboro, Massachusetts 01772, (617) 485.9100, TWX (710) Tulsa OK, Blue. Beit PA, Carnegie PA, Pittsburgh PA, Austin 390.0309, TLX 94.8460, Waltham MA, Scottsdale AZ, EI Segundo TX, Dallas TX, Houston TX, Sall Lake City UT,Falls Church VA, CA, Palo Alto CA, Sacramento CA, San Diego CA, Santa Ana Renton WA, Menomonee Falls, WI, Calgary Alta., Edmonton CA, Santa Barbara CA, Denver CO, North Haven CT, Orlando Alta., North Vancouver B.C., Winnipeg Man., Landon Ont., FL, Atlanta GA, Schaumburg IL, Indianapolis IN, Louisville KY, Mississauga Ont., Dollard-Des-Ormeaux P.O., Hull P.O., and in Southfield MI, Minnuapoiis MN, Clayton MO, Kansas City MO, Australia, Austria, Costa Rica, Denmark, England, Finland, Saddle Brook NJ, Albuquerque NM, Buffalo NY, Cammack Long, France, Greece, Hong Kong, Iran, Israel, Italy,Japan, Malaysia, Island NY, Ithaca NY, Now York NY, Rochester NY, Schonec- Mexico, Netherlands; Philippines, Puerto Fico, Scotland. Singa- tady NY, Syracuse NY, Greensboro NC, Euclid OH, Dayton OH, pore, Spain, Sweden; Switzerland, West Germany The materials contained herein are summary in nature, subject General equipment and software are available in the applicable to change, and intended for general information only. Details technical manuals,available through.lccal sales representatives. and specifications concerning the use and operation of Data 005321 ,11 � I�DatLC t+rrdSt��a�unSHiil��w4L++►�41r �u41�72(Gl7)4 5r71(!Q rs,ll at i5��} 1 t1� la, �T'xtsf( n 11:$ ...rilYZ+'r.0 .rwrw RESPONSE TO f' C0011cou"UnICATIOU EAGLE SIG1dAL CORPORATION t REQUEST FOR QUOTATION 0327 ; 8,2 MO131LE STATUS ILIOWLE i Codec! Communications Corporation proposes the RY?porter III , Model H/ED/197J-03 tiobi.le Status Unit. a i This unit is the third generation of the "Reporter" series of mobile status units developed by -Coded Communications. Reporter provides- the same Status and; Message functions as the previous Reporter II and Reporter IIA, except it incorporates improvements in night-time Status and Message legend illumination, microprocessor control for increased reliability, and an operator selectable mute function. The signalling method and messages formats are identical to Reporter II and; Reporter ITA. Coded also proposes the. Model 2404, Base Station Encoder Decoder/Computer Interface unit. i As an alternate to the Model 2404, Coded proposes the Model 2400 Status System. HARDWARE A. The Reporter III ,. Model M/Ery/10U-03 provides the following features: 1. Eight (8) Status capability, plus five ( 5) capability. One message is normally reserved an emergency condii_ion, and its associated push ` button is spaced from the status and message button. {!f „f 2. In addition to the Status and Messages, the unit ►, identification is transmitted each time the micro- ti phone Push-To-Talk (PTT) switch is depressed. This occurs even if the PTT switch is depressed momentar- ily. i 3. Clear channel sensing utilizing a channel busy/clear y signal from the I•lotorola MOTRAC and MOCON 70 receiver' 4. Data validity is checked at both the mobile and base � uniU3. Each data burst contains three completes and redundant data messages. The -identity is checked - on a bit-by--bit iasis while, simultaneously, the entire message is chochod for bit errors by a Bose-Chmuduri : type cyclic--error-detecting code. All mobile--to-baso ,And base-to-mobile messages (witti ;. the exception of: the PTT and acknowledgement) are acicnowledged by . the receiving unit, .thereby providing ` assurance to the sending operator that the data Cq EI}.C,()Iy MU!IICpT.ION$ CUPORATIdW •',6241 YARROW DRIVE:'CARL'iSAO.CAUFORNIA 92008-- i",141438-2800 At 1 113 ...Q^` N. stn.,.,,_ ..., .._..:. .. .._......-.._. .a kesponse to RSC RPQ 0327 , Cont ' d -2- transmitted was received. of special interest to, the user is the fact. that select calls to mobile units are acknowledged by the mobile units. • 5. Identification codes from 1110001 to ;2047 are standard. 6. The Reporter III , Model M/ED/lOU-03 is compatible with low band, VHF, and UIIF Motorola MOTRAC and MOCOM 70 radios. 7. In the event a mobile generated status or message is not acknowledged; the unit waits five (5) seconds and then retransmits the data. The total number of data transmissions is five ( 5 ) , as limited by the FCC. Of special interest to the user is the operation of the mobile ac]:no�aledgement..indicator. Normally, this indicator. is ,unlighted. When a Status or Message is transmitted the indicator is, illuminated. I.t remains in this condition during the five transmissions ( if unacknowledged) . If an acknowledgement is received, the indicator is extinguished. If five transmissions occur without an acknowledgement, the indicator blinks, alerting the mobile operator that the transmission was not received. B. The Communications Center may transmit a selective call to any individual mobile unit. Reception of an appropriately identified call message causes the Call Indicator to blink. The Call Indicator will be extinguished when the radio microphone PTT switch is depressed. As stated previously, all mobile selective calls are acknowledged automatically by the Reporter III . In addition to the above specified features, the other beneficial features are: 9. The Reporter III may be interrogated: by the base station for its current status condition. Reception of an Interrogate Commandcausesthe unit to automatically key the transmitter and send its current status condition. 10. The unit incorporates a front-panel "Repeat Status" button. This button is depressed to resend a status condition cycle if a status was transmitted five ( 5 ) times without an acknowledgement. This button frees the mobileoperator from trying to release the locked-in mechanically interlocked push-button. 11. All push-buttons are dimly illuminated for night-time viewing. The current status push-button is more brightly illuminated. 12. -Vilhcn used in conjunction with the Model 2404 Computer • Interface Unit .and an ,Eagle Signal Corp mini-computer, t - he Reporter III will receive and respond to four ( 4) edigital commands. At th4 s time ,the 119gel-24O0 Status syst.cm;_.cloes nat _have the capdbili.�y 'tq s�nc3 thMse ' commands w: 0053 � � lel f! '. 011L ' d 13. The Reporter III incorporates a front panel Mute/Unmute switch, The rear panel output may be used to mute the radio receiver until a selective call is received. The mute condition can be disabled by the mobile operator by a depression of the Mute/Unmute alternate-action Pushbutton. B. Normal irstallation time for the Reporter III is from 1'1 to 2 hours. 8. 1.1. 2 BASK STATION A. Coded Communications Corp proposes the Model 2404-02I<01 , Base Encoder/Decoder - Computer Interface Unit to fulfill the requirements for the base station encoder/decoder and base station radio interface unit:. The Model 2404-02I<01 incorporates two radio channel encoder/decoders , and manipulations of input/output digital radio data , acknowledgements, and computer output are controlled by a micro-processor. Incoming digital messages may be simultaneous on the two radio channel inputs. The processor converts the digital information to ASCII with RS232C levels, adds the radio channel number ( 1 or 2) and forwards the information to an external processor. The unit can be specified to automatically acknowledge the mobile messages (except PTT and mobile Acks) , or can be specified as a non-acknowledging unit ( in this case the external processor would provide the acknowledgement information back to the 2404) . The output circuit- board for the external processor incorporates jumpers for selection of: Data Rate 1200 , 2400 , 4800, or 9600 bau< Character Length - 7 or 8 bits. Stop Bits - 1 or 2. Tho output format is composed of 14 ASCII characters , and is further defined in Specification G0110-043 (attached) . The external processor can also send selective calls and interrogation commands to the mobile unit by specifying the mobile identification , call or interrogation , and the desired transmit channel. Lxpansion of the Model 2404-021<01 to three or four total I/O radio channels is accomplished in the field by the addition of plug-in Radio Encoder/Decoder circuit boards. Software ( firmware) is contained. within the unit to accomodate "these additions, and no firmware changes are • necessary at the time of the addition( s) . The' 2404-02KO'1 is compatible with a , Data General NOVA computer with a serial I/O, port. ,° Q.Q � RUS})O050 to 1"jU 1�1'':_: ) 3�.� , Cont. d D. The external. computer 1/0 port is described above and further detailed in attached specification G0110-048. The radio input and output of the Model 2404 are single ended, referenced to ground. The input is compatible with the radio receiver volume Control Iii or discriminator output. The output is compatible with the radio trans- mitter Microphone Iii input. If the input and output lines from the base station' radio are balanced, 600 ohm, a Coded Communications' Miodel 24IUA, Line Hatching Unit is required on each input and output. This unit is quoted ` as an option. Each data output is also provided with a transmitter key line. This line keys the base transmitter, allows for the base transmitter and link attack delay, _and remains keyed during the transmission of data. This output will sink 300ma to ''ground' from up to a x-30 volt , source. 8. 1. 3 OPTIONS A. To fulfill the requirements of the optional stand-alone automatic status system with an output to the CRD system, Coded Communications proposes the Model 2402A-O2KO1 Status Controller. This unit will interface to two radio channels, and may be expanded to a total of four by plug-in circuit cards. The unit will also support four (4) CRT Terminals. The terminals may be either the Lear-Siegler AD14-1, or ADM-2. These terminals are ordered with an internal sounder, and a minor modification to the keyboard is : made at Coded. The printer used with the system is the Extel Series AH printer. Coded will provide ordering information for the CRT Terminals and Printer to "ESC. It is suggested that: these items be drop-shipped to Coded for the modification to the CRT Terminals and system checkout. Coded will provide an output port for status and message data to the CAD processor. Information detailing the output format is attached The I,todel 2402A-021<01. will support 256 field units, and will" display the status' of these unit in four ( 4) pages of 611 vehicles each. Transmitted pre-coded" messages are also displayed on the -CRT Terminal screen. Calls and interrogations are made from the CRT Terminal keyboard. Detailed information on the functions and display are contain' cd 'in the attached literature. 00536 r Response to ESC RFQ 0327 , cont'd --5-- B. Compatible Coded equipment which could be added to the system are as follows: I . Model ISI/E/GU Mobile identifier. This unit sends the identity with each ITT, and an external momentary switch will send -the Emergency message in a repeat burst (5 times) mode. The digital format is compatible with the 2402A and 2404. This unit could be used in vehicle:: which do not require transmission of status. II, Model IA/D/IU-02 Selective Call Decoder with Ack. This unit may be selectively called from the 2402A or 2404. Upon receipt of a call the unit returns an acknowledgement. The unit sends the identity with each PTT, and an external momentary switch will send the Emergency message in a repeat burst (5 times) mode. This unit could be used in vehicles which require selective calling , PTT identity and Emergency, but which do not require transmission of status. III . Model M/E/£3U One-Way Status Encoder. This unit provides the capability to send 2 status conditions, PTT identity, and the Emergency message. The unit is a one-way encoder only, without the capability to receive an acknowledgement. The status conditions and PTT identity messages are sent only once. The Emergency message is transmitted in a repeat burst ( 5 times) mode, by a front panel P.B. This unit could be used in mobile units which do not require the eight (8) status conditions or the acknowledgement capability. "R1oi3, �1�i-PER' kj G Y^F^' .,,r. A' P P E N D I X II Preliminary System Description i Computer Aided Dispatch 2isplays and`Procedure's The "Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispat'c' h' Sy�''tem will interface -with ' the dispatchers through` a series 'of 'inter-- active displays ,using the video 'display" units`,' k6yboards and special ' function=keys' ' N' log 'pry neer arid diskette' will record all events along with `the date' and 'time; The major System displays will include the following: "Alarm,;Receipt "and Dispatch, Disp'iay' _ Box Alarm`Display Additional Unit Dispatch Display Incident Report Display ~ Unit Status Display ~ Move-up Status Display ~ Map Coverage Display Summary of Active Incidents' 'Display' - Hydrants 'Dut of: Service Display - Closed Streets Display - Fumigation Location Display This section will describe 'in 'detail the 'propos'ed content, formats and procedures for each of the displays used with' the .system. f All entries by a dispatcher will be made using a key- board on a working video display unit. The computer will respond to all ,entries in less than a second Entries will be made in one of ,three.ways : filling: in a ,display, as a command, oras a ,status change. Commands will be used to bring up a display, to enter certain data not associated with a specific display or to accept a message or system alert. Special function keys are, used -to enter status changes by a. dispatcher. , The status changes will appear on the bottom line of the status video display when entered for editing purposes. Unit status information will always be displayed on the status video display units. All other displays will use the working video display units. The status displays will be identical at all positions. The working displays will depend on the function which .each dispatcher. is performing at the time. The top line of each working video display will be used by the computer to show system alerts The .second line will be reserved for the dispatcher to enter commands. The cursor will normally be positioned at the ,beginning of this line awaiting an entry unless the dispatcher is in the middle of filling in a display. The remaining 22 lines will be used for the displays. t� Alarm Receipt and Dispatch Display The Alarm Receipt and Dispatch Display will be used by the Contra Costa dispatchers to enter verbal alarms and to make dispatch assignments. The display enables operators to interact with the computer to determine emergency loca- tions and suggested dispatches. Error correcting and indexed street names enable fast and efficient operation. Alarm Receipt The Alarm Receipt and Dispatch .display is activated on a working video display unit by depressing the ALARM special function key. Figure 3 shows the display upon initial activation. Incident__ TY e The computer will position the video display cursor on line three (3) after the title INCIDENT TYPE. The time of the display activation will also be displayed on line three (3) after the title ALARM TIME. The most commonly used possible incident type two letter codes will be displayed on lines eleven (11) through fifteen (15) . These may include: Incident Type Entry Code 110 House TR Trash BR Brush CB Commercial Building AP Apartment House WG Wash Gas 4V '41 h x x x x x x � H x x x • xxx � xx xx0x xxxxx � xx '>Cx ti eta xx � � .,. a 4 x xxx. H U rx H r V W x H (14 0xx x 3 xx7C X A � x a .n xxx � x U xxx �cx ol x xxx � xxxxSC '� 3 C9 IOC xxxxx H xxxxx E-4 � xxxx r �cxx x � OQ xxXx xxx WHHC; xxxx H0U �c a xxxxx xxxx I I I Ha x3� xxX • The operator may enter the incident type on the work- ing video display unit using the keyboard, review the entry, and execute the entry by depressing the SEND special function key. The cursor will be in place and ready to accept the incident type entry as follows : ENTRY : incident type code, SEND EXAMPLE: TR SEND HO SEND The computer will fill out the coded incident type, or accept an incident type that is fully spelled out, on line three (3) . The suggested possible incident type codes on lines e1,?ven (11) through fifteen (15) will be cleared. The dispatcher may skip the incident type entry by depressing the TAB key on the keyboard. Reported Location The cursor will be positioned on line four (4) following the REPORTED LOCATION title upon entry of the incident type or use of the TAB key. The reported location may be entered as a street address , intersection, or building/place name. • 054.1 Street Address A street address may be entered as follows : ENTRY : house number, street name, street modifier, community , SEND EXA'tSPLE : 1234 CLAYTON RD CONCORD SEND (1) 1234 CLAYTON SEND (2) 1234 CLA SEND ( 3) 1234 C SEND (4) If the street name is not completely entered, the com- puter will display an indexed list of all streets within the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District in the appro- priate alphabetical group. The indexed list will be in three (3) columns with up to fifty-four (54) street names . The operator may PAGE the display to review additional lists of fifty four (54) streets each. The street index will list the street names , modifiers , and communties in alphabetical order. If a street exists in more than one community or has more than one modifier, each instance will be listed separately. The indexed street name list for the above example entry number three (3) may be as follows : 1 CLANCY ST WALNUT CR 2 CLANCY LN WALNUT CR 3 CLAYTON RD CONCORD 4 CLAYTON RD WALNUT CR 00 b�f _ The video display cursor will be positioned on lane seven (7) following an ENTER '1U1,1BER OF S'T'REET FROM LIST title. The operator may enter the index number of the selected street name, review the entry and depress the SEND key to execute. ` The computer will clear line seven (7) . It will then display the street address , as previously entered, and the selected street name modifier and community on line seven (7) following the VERIFIED LOCATION title . The indexed street name may be entered as follows : ENTRY : index number for street name , modifier and community SEND EXAIdPLE: 3 (CLAYTON RD CONCORD) ENTRY RESULT: 1234 CLAYTON RD CONCORD Cross Street The computer may reject the above entry if the street address is out of the address ranee. In this case , the cursor will be positioned on line seven (7) following an ADDRESS OUT OF RANGE, ENTER NUMBER OF CROSS STREET FROM LIST message. The commuter will display on Lines eight (8) through twenty-four (24) an indexed list in geographical order of all cross streets and block address ranges for the entered street. The list will be in three (3) columns with up to fifty-four (54) listings. The operator may PAGE for additional lists . The indexed cross street list may appear, as follows : 1 BROWN AV- CON 1100-11991 . 2 SAWYER PL CON, 1200-1220 3 JONES AV CON 1221-71299 4 SMITH AV CON 1..300-1399. The operator will select the index number of the nearest cross street as based� on , further ,interview with the caller. The computer will clear line seven (7) and display the completed VERIFIED LOCATION as the street name, and cross street name and community. The indexed cross street entry may appear as follows : ENTRY: Index number of selected cross street SEND RESULT: CLAYTON AV; JONES AV CONCORD Error Correction The entry of a complete street address and name will be accepted and verified by the computer. In this case, the procedures used to select from the indexed list will not be necessary. The computer may determine that a street address and name may appear in more than one location within the fire dis- trict. The street name may appear with more than one modifier (i.e:' OAK BLVD, OAK LN, OAK ST) The street address and name may be duplicated in more than one community. In 00547 this case the computer will position the cursor on line seven ,(7) following a STREET. NOT UNIQUE, ENTER NUMBER OF STREET ;FROM LIST. message, The computer will display on lines eight (8)-=,through twenty-four (24) an indexed list of the alternative street names and. their ,communities. The operator will select the desired street and enter the index number. The computer will:'ciear�,].a.ne seven (7) and display the street address, street name, correct modifier and correct community as the VERIFIED LOCATION. Misspelled .Name The entry of a street name that is not listed in the .geographic data base will result in a list of alternatives ,based on .certain types of spelling errors. These alterna- tives. will. be, indexed and appear on lines .eight (8): to , twenty-four (24) . The . cursor will, be-positioned, on ,line seven (7) following an UNKNOWN STREET, ENTER NUMBER OF STREET- FROM. LIST message. The- entry will be. executed as described previously. If a correct street name cannot be determined, the operator may reposition the cursor using the TAB key to line four (4) REPORTED LOCATION to enable a new entry attempt. • 00,548 Intersection As an alternative to' the entry of a 'REPORTED LOCATION • as a street address and name, the computer will accept an intersection. The intersection will be entered as follows ENTRY:' street name, modifier, ; cross street name, modifier, community SEND Note : the semicolon symbol is used to denote 'an i .' , As a minimum, the dispatcher may enter the first letter of the first street name and the " ; " , review and execute using the SEND key. If less than a full street -name is entered, the computer will position the cursor online seven (7) after the message ENTER NU14BER OF STREET 'FROM LIST, OR ENTER NU14BER OF CROSS STREET FROM LIST�'and will display indexed lists- on lines 'eight (8) through twenty- four (24) as' previously- described. EXAMPLE: TREAT LN OAK GROVE RD 'CONCORD' ' " SEND The computer will verify this REPORTED LOCATION entry and, if it exists as a unique intersection, will confirm it as a VERIFIED' ENTRY. 00549 EXAMPLE: TREAT LN ; OAK GROVE RD CONCORD SEND • The computer will list alternative modifiers or commun- ities for both TREAT and OAK GROVE if they are not unique. The selection of the alternatives will be by index number as previously described. EXA14PLE: TREAT SEND The computer will list alternative communities for TREAT if they exist. The computer will list cross streets in geographical order for TREAT. The selection of the alternatives will be by index number as previously described. EXAMPLE: T SEND The computer will list all streets , modifiers and communities in the T alphabetical group. The computer will list cross streets in geographical order for the selected street. modifier, and community. The selection of the alternatives will be by index number as previously described. If a street, cross street and community have been properly entered and are unique, the computer will display the street name, modifier, cross street name; modifier and community on line seven (7) as a VERIFIED 'LOCATION. If a "correct intersection cannot be verified, the operator may reposition the cursor using the TAB key to line four (Q) REPORTED LOCATION to enable a new entry attempt. • 0. 50 rj 1 Building/Place Name As an alternative to the entry of a REPORTED LOCATION as a street address or intersection, the computer will accept a building or place name. The building/place name will be entered as follows : ENTRY: building or place name SEND , The operator may enter a complete name or a partial name. If a -part al ,,name is, entered, the computer position of the cursor on line seven (7) after , the message ENTER NUMBER OF BUILDING/PLACE NAME FROM LIST and will display indexed lists on lines eight (8) through twenty-four (24) as previously described. EXAMPLE: CONCORD INN SEND The computer will verify this REPORTED LOCATION entry, and if it exists in the geographic data base file, will confirm it as a VERIFIED LOCATION adding the street address and community to the entry. EXAMPLE: CO SEND The computer will list alternative building/place names in either types or alphabetical groupings for CO. The selection of the alternatives will .be by indexed number as previously described. 00.551 X EXAMPLE. ,. HOSPITALS 1 COUNTY GENERAL. ,WAL .CR ; . 2 CONCORD, CONCORD 3 PET, WAL CR HOTELS 4 CONCORD INN, CONCORD 5 HOLIDAY INN, WALNUT CR PARKS 6 COUNTY, CONCORD 7 CONCORD, CONCORD 8 WALNUT CREEK, WALNUT CR REST HOMES 9 COMFORT HOME, CONCORD 10 J014ES HOME, WALNUT CR EXAMPLE: 1 CONCORD INN, CONCORD 2 CONCORD PET HOSPITAL, CONCORD 3 HOLIDAY INN, WALNUT CR 4 WALNUT CREEK PARK, WALNUT CR If the building/place name has been properly entered and exists in the geographica data base, the computer will display the name, street address and community on line seven (7) as a VERIFIED LOCATION. 3„ � C •7 i ' t �Y� "S'-4t�Li, ilF ,C 1•(S( f�: { a}h. s' ISS 1 .w� ��' If a building or place name cannot be -ver-fied, the • operator may reposition the cursor- using- the TAB key to line four (4) REPORTED LOCATION to enable a" new entry attempt. C _0 t7 • Area Code If a valid location cannot be determined for a street address, intersection or building/place name, the dispatcher may estimate the general location and enter the nearest AREA CODE. This will enable a dispatch to be made. ENTRY: AC, area code number, SEND EXAMPLE: AC 11$ SEND AC -1OX SEND Location Verification Upon confirmation of a VERIFIED LOCATION, or the entry of an area code number, the computer will display on line eight (8) the associated area code, map coordinates police jurisdiction, police beat number, water district and ambulance zone. Special conditions at the VERIFIED LOCATION or in the same or adjacent map grid co-ordinates will be displayed on lines nine (9) through seventeen (17) . Specific location information will include fumigation notices. Nearby con- ditions will include hydrants out of service, closed streets or other active incidents. Location Details After the reported location has been entered and verified, the computer will position the cursor on line 5 after the • title LOCATION COMMENTS. The dispatcher may then enter up to 58 characters of text. This text may include the � ^'� 14p{d., apartment number, floor, etc. The TAB key must be depressed after the entry is made or to skip the entry. Caller Details After the TAB key is depressed to either enter or skip the LOCATION DETAILS, the computer will position the cursor on line six (6) after the title CALLER. The operator may enter up to fifty-eight'., (58) .characters of text. This text may include the caller' s name and telephone number. Figure A provides an example of the alarm Receipt and :Di"spatch ,display after the location has been verified. I .: �• ... ;`�► 1`its•'-' ro � nt-' oz r H Ln tTj 3, H � 'TJLrTJH ;d d tri :d 1-1 H tT] ' otL o Ln wN U) ntdTJd I zdH Lo 0 Z O � CNrJO �C to H C1 ro j I Htny I � t1i LnHxHrnHt-3 H H J r H G) � N zz z H C7 N I I broO t7jcoM Ul x 4 I - n H O z O r I-h �1 H C 0 "D fD 3 fi d ro o n Wtd �Zotri N H N �, tb H En O y � tri H N zdror m U) y 1-d Her H Croy C H y m ; �- t7 tri; cn tC n H H f7 "" z � x ~ X CD Display Transfer • The alarm receipt process will be completed upon con- firmation. of a verified location or area code and entry of the special conditions , location details and caller details if known. In a single point dispatch operation the dis- patcher will continue with the dispatch process. In a multiple stage dispatch, the dispatcher may chose to transfer the alarm receipt information by depressing the ALARM TRANSFER special function key. This will enter the alarm in the incident queue with a priority as determined by the incident type. Alarm Dispatch Upon confirmation of a verified location, valid area code and/or acknowledgement of an ALARM TRANSFER, the com- puter will display the alarm assignment and a suggested dispatch. Alarm Receipt and Dispatch Display assignments will be displayed on the first and second alarm lines eighteen (18) and nineteen (19) . The first and second alarm move-up assignments will be displayed on lines twenty-one (21) and twenty-two (22) . The suggested dispatch will be displayed on line twenty-four (24) . The computer will position the cursor on line twenty- i four (24) following the DISPATCH title. The dispatcher may then review the suggested dispatch, modify the dispatch , place the incident in queue, cancel the dispatch or use the TAB to enter additional information such as caller details , incident type, etc. Suggested Dispatch To accept the suggested dispatch, the TAB key may be depressed once to position the cursor to the right of the suggested dispatch line. The SEND key may then be used to execute the dispatch. Upon execution of the dispatch, the computer will display the time of dispatch on line twenty-four following the TIME title. The computer will also display a sequential incident number on line twenty- four (24) following the INC NUM title. The computer will then position the cursor at the beginning of line two (2) to enable a new entry to be made. Selective Dispatch The dispatcher may change a suggested dispatch by changing, adding, or deleting units. Changes are entered from the working video display unit keyboard using a letter and number to identify the vehicle type and unit. Units entered will automatically delete the suggested units appMar- ing on line twenty-four (24) . When all units have been ' ' $ ` err ♦ ,f 'L j . • entered, the dispatch assignment may be executed by '-depress- ing 'the SEND key. Should a unit selected for dispatch be unavailable, it will be displayed in reverse video. The computer will reposition the cursor following the DISPATCH title to enable to proper dispatch assignment to be entered. The 'editing functions of the video display terminals will enable movement of the cursor to efficiently add,' delete or change the units suggested for dispatch. Upon completion of the selective assignment, the dispatch may be executed by depressing the SEND key. Incident Queue A low priority incident may be placed in an incident queue b entering the letter Q' on line twenty-fou four (2 q Y g y- 4) . ENTRY:' ` DISPATCH Q SEND The computer will clear the units from the dispatch on line twenty-four (24) , di`splay the time the incident was placed in queue after 'the title TIME, display the incident number after the title INC"NUM and position the cursor at the beginning of line 2 to enable a new entry to be made. In addition,''an' alert code QUEUE will be, displayed in a flashing mode on the top lune of all working video displays o� r Y,i t P T5�4 �� i i a d' 1 --� i r _ 7 1 n• for 30 seconds. The code will then be displayed in a . steady state with the number of incidents in queue. When no incidents remain in queue, the code will be cleared from the top line., Changed Incident The incident may be cancelled by entering the letter C on Line 24 after the title DISPATCH and ,depressing the SEND key. The computer will clear the screen and position the cursor at the beginning of line 2 to enable a new entry to be made. The dispatcher may go back and enter additional alarm information prior to making a dispatch. The TAB key may be used to position the cursor. Depressing the TAB. key will ptitle, osition the cursor on line 3 after_ the INCIDENT TYPE, if it has not been entered or else on line ,S after the title LOCATION DETAILS. Dispatch Acknowledgement Failure If the status of all dispatched, units are not changed to responding within a given . time (e.g. 30, seconds) ,, the com- puter will generage a system alert and display the letters ACK in a flashing mode on the top line of all working„video displays. Any dispatcher may accept ,a system .alert by 00560 depressing the ACCEPT function key. The computer will then clear the letters ACK from the top Tine of all working video displays and activate the Additional Dispatch Display for the specific incident. The unresponsive units will be dis- played in a flashing mode on line 24 `after the title DISPATCH. The cursor will be positioned under the first unit. The dispatcher may then take one or more of the following appro- priate actions : - redispatch these units - dispatch other units - make no dispatch - change the units status Box Alarm Display The Box Alarm display is used by dispatchers to receive box alarms and to make dispatches. The display is similar to the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch Display except that only the box number is entered. The incident type, reported location, location details and caller are not required. A dispatcher will :activate the Box Alarm display by depressing the BOX function key, enter the box number on line three (3) after the title BOX NUMBER and depress the SEND key. The computer will then fill out the display as described for a -verbal alarm. However, 'if the computer cannot find the box number in ' its, data base, it .will instead _n" } 1 ; Z display the entered box number in reverse video on line three (3) and position, the cursor on line three (3) under the box number so that the correct box number can be entered. A suggested dispatch will be : displayed on line twenty- four (24) and may be accepted, changed', deleted or the incident stored in queue or cancelled in -the same manner as for a verbal alarm. Additional Dispatch Display The Additional Dispatch Display is used to dispatch additional units to a working incident or to dispatch units to an incident which had been placed in queue. It is an interactive display and is activated by depressing the ADD DISP function key when the cursor is on line two. (2) . The cursor is then positioned on line 3 -after the title INC NUM. The dispatcher may ,then enter either the last three digits of the incident number .or, if it is a working inci- dent, any unit currently assigned to the incident. The entry is made .as follows : ENTRY incident number or unit SEND EXAMPLES: 326 SEND E5 . SEND ` If tthe .incident ,status is ,complete . or in queue, or the selected unit is actually assigned to the.-Incident,- the nn((rr entry will be displayed in reverse video. The cursor will be positioned under the entry to enable a valid one to be made. When a valid entry has been made, the computer will dis- play the full incident number on line three (3) , fill in the rest of the display and position the cursor on line twenty- four (24) after the title DISPATCH. The display will con- tain known alarm information. The actual location of the incident if different from the reported location, may be entered on line seven (7) . Lines eight (8) through eleven (11) show all units which have been dispatched to the inci- dent, times of dispatch, arrival and in service. Lines twelve (12) through fifteen (15) show the full assignment for the area code. The move up assignements are shown on lines sixteen (16) through nineteen (19) . Comments added by a dispatcher are shown on lines twenty (20) through twenty three (23) . Figure 5 provides an example. Additional dispatches may be made and acknowledged as previously described. However, a suggested dispatch is not shown, an incident number is not assigned, and the title INC NUM is not displayed. The cursor will be positioned on line three (3) after the title INCIDENT TYPE if the incident is a verbal alarm, or on line five (5) after the title DETAILS if the incident is a box alarm. The dispatcher 00563 r= V%o ti N triwtri triMtri +-' N ✓ �' f ' rti-I t 7IN }—' y tri © 0 C) aah, i -I tTi W tai tTj G S J tri tri Ln oa J t rr ' H H .• NN tritTiti .. ttjnHHC tncn �Nw Nrn t-+ dZZ 11 , p m I y to ti }_+ V7 co bi 0 :4 H CO 4:1. Ln Ln W CD td w rn I U� I'd F' N 0 1-4 H H N H +G+�' tri tri N .a t~n I F-I Ln CC4 C), w Q1 G Cri tTi CJ J w H H M tV x tri N H Z N N n ri tj n r tri (D d I p to kd tri H It Ct 4 w H N co I 1 Y �C w o may skip the additional dispatch by using the TAH key .to position the cursor on - line three (3) or :five (5) . The dispatcher may. use the additional Dispatch Display to enter or change the incident type, ,location details, caller details, or actual location, as this information becomes known. The dispatcher may also add 'comments about an :incident. A comment is added by first entering the letter A and depressing the SEND key. Previous comments on lines twenty (20) through twenty-two (22) are then shafted down one line. The current time is displayed at the beginning of line 10. The cursor is positioned on line twenty (20) . Free form text may then be entered. If the comment should continue on to line twenty-one (21) , the existing lines twenty one (21) and twenty two (22) will be shifted down one line , etc. As comment lines are shifted down, line twenty-three (23) will be shifted to the next "page" and the letter P will be displayed in reverse video in the last column of line twenty-three (23) to indicate that more comments exist on the next page. To review comments on the next page, .the letter P is entered and the SEND key depressed when the cursor ,is posi- tioned at the beginning of line twenty (20) . The computer 00.565 will temporarily clear the screen and display all comments starting on three (3) . The cursor is positioned at the beginning of line three (3) and the dispatcher may either add a comment or page back to the display by enter- ing the letters A or P respectively and, depressing the SEND ,key. Incident Report Display The Incident Report Display is similar to the Additional Dispatch Display except that it does not provide for dis- patches. It may be activated on a working video display depressing the INC RPT function key when the cursor is on line two (2) . The cursor will then be positioned on line three (3) after the title INC NUM. The last three digits of the incident number must be entered. Figure 6 shows an example of this display. Upon entry of the incident, number, the computer will .position the cursor on line three (3) after the INCIDENT. TYPE title. The dispatcher may then enter or change the incident type, location details or actual location or he can add comments as described above gar the. Additional Dispatch Display. The TAB key may be used to skip past an entry and the ESC�IPE key may be used to exit from the display and reposition the cursor. on line two (2) . nn • COLOO h i 1,9�I10 � �jOOZ --1 cooovvi �-3 �-3Z U W N W O O O W N N Q\ N d Z Z OMrQd M H (-n b m W O `lq H N A 'Z, N Ul W Z (n co � a,\ I 0 x un 4:1. Wtil G lD N -1 I M C] H •• •• •• Ul I H Ln W W m A 2 M RC1 \ > y H Cz7 N (1) Z d M �-9 n y ro H M d x M hi H I z y 0 C M C) .. H b M O I H 'rj M H d bM1 � co H d C7 H Ui � \ G t� (D y X M lz7 � M C� �3 H I I-� x H x • x w x � 0 s Alerts Alerts will be generated by the computer when certain specified conditions exist. When an alert is generated, the computer will display the following codes in a flashing mode on the top .line of all working video display units: - ACK failure of a unit to respond to a dispatch - ACK4%1U - failure of a unit to respond to a move up - STAT xxx - inconsistent status change entered by unit xxx - MOVE - a move up may be required - INC nnnnn - Incident nnnnn has not closed in eight (3) hours. - MSG - a message is waiting (displayed only on terminal of recipient) - EQUIP - an equipment failure has occurred Codes will be displayed in the order in which they were generated. A dispatcher may acknowledge the first alert by positioning the cursor at the beginning of line two (2) and depressing the ACCEPT function key. The computer will then clear lines three (3) through twenty-four , (24) and display the full alert message. Unit Status Display The current unit status will be available to the dis- patchers ,as a separate status video display monitor at their positions . The .display will list all units in station, on the air and at incidents . 0056C) a Units will be listedd at the station to which they are currently assigned. Units on the air will be shown at the stations nearest their. assignment. Units at the main-, tenance shop or in training will be separately listed under the title SH/TR. Chiefs and other units not assigned to a specific station will be listed under a separate title. Units assigned to an incident will be listed under the inti- dent number. A unit will be designated by a combination of letters and numbers totaling up to four characters : The first letter(s) designate the type of unit as follows : Letter Code Type of Unit E engine T truck P11 power wagon TA tanker WS water supply CA cascade COM communications van WR wrecker CAR car ATR aircraft BC Battalion Chief AC Assistant Chief �c (a00 E' The unit number will designate the station to which it is permanently assigned. Reserve engines and trucks have the letter A after their number. A unit will- be displayed in the normal mode if it is available with a full crew. it will be displayed in the dim mode if it is conditionally available and it will be displayed in the reverse .video �mode if it is unavailable. If it is either conditionally available or unavailable and not assigned to an incident, it may have a letter code displayed one space to the right of it indicating the reason it is not available. These codes are as follows : Letter Code Availability Status 13 temporarily busy D driver only L equipment problem M mechanical problem T training X unmanned A unit not assigned ' to an incident and on the air will have an asterisk {*) displayed one space to its left. _1'6 The station numbers will be displayed in the normal mode and will be followed by a dash and a number showing the number of crews currently available at the station. If only a driver is available, the letter "D" will be dis- played. If both a full crew and driver are available, the number of crews and the letter "D" will both be displayed. Units listed under the station are either physically at the station or on -the air in the vicinity of the station. Units assigned to an incident will be listed under the incident in the lower portion of the display. Up to ten incident numbers can be displayed. If more than ten inci- dents are in progress at the same time, the older medical incidents will be temporarily dropped from the display to make room for newer fire incidents. The units will be listed under the incident number in the order in which they were dispatched. If more than five units are assigned to an incident, two or more adjacent columns will be used for the incident. When all units are released from an incident, it will be dropped from the display and the column(s) cleared, Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District units sent to other fire districts for mutual aid will be displayed in reverse video under the title AID. 00571 tY{ .�.+.F..! ti �.. .1 "tt 4 .1 ' ..X.Y.. , •Y t.ti 1. 4 � ...1 t.., c i r .: bt S -..X• Mutual Aid Status Display Mutual Aid Units from other fire districts serving in the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District will be shown on a separate Mutual Aid Status Display similar in format to the Unit Status display. The Mutual Aid Units will ,use their own designation of up to four characters. The designation will be prefixed by a two letter code indicating the originating fire district. The codes are as follows : District Code fire District DA Danville CF California Division of forestry 2iC March Creek ?SO Moraga MU East Bay Municipal Utility District PI Pinole RI Riverview RO Rodeo RP Fast Bay Regional Park District Status Updates . A dispatch may update unit status using special function keys at the working video display keyboards . The status { function keys will include- - On Air - Responding - Off Air - Arrived at Scene '' In Service - Conditionally available Out of Service - Move Up A dispatcher may change a unit status using the key- board ey-board as follows : ENTRY: unit type, unit number, new status EXAMPLES : E 113 ARRIVED BC 1 OFF AIR E 114 116 COND AVAIL A status update will appear on the bottom line of the status video display as it is entered for review by the dispatcher. Execution of the status change will update the display, clear the bottom line, and log the change -on the printer along with the date and time. Station Crew/Driver Status The status of crew/driver at the station will be displayed with the station number. A dispatcher may change a crew or driver status using the special function key and the crew or driver designation as follows : ENTRY: crew/driver number, station number, new status EXAMPLE : CR 113 S 113 AVAIL DR 113 S 113 OUT .OF SERVICE , Move-Up Status Display The Move-up Status display will list units currently in a move-up status. The list will include the ,unit designation, the new station and the time of the move-up..assignment. l - 005'73 Move-Up Status Updates Move-up status updates may be required as a result of system alerts or review of the Map Coverage Display. Move-ups may be performed at the conclusion of a dispatch using the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch Display, Box Alarm Dispatch Display or the Additional Dispatch Display or when the cursor is located on line two (2) of the working video display unit. The dispatcher may perform a move-up using the MOVE-UP special function key as follows : ENTRY: MOVE UP, unit, station, SEND EXAMPLES : MOVE UP E4 1 SEND MOVE UP E6 5 E16 15 SEND Any number of sets of units and stations may be entered prior to depressing the SEND key. When the entry is made the computer will first determine if the unit(s) are either available or conditionally available. If a unit is unavail- able, the computer will not implement that moveup but instead display the unavailable unit in a flashing mode on the entry line for five seconds. If the unit is available , it will be cleared from its present location on the status video display and shown under its new station. A moveup may be cancelled by moving the unit back to its home station using the procedure described above. The moveup assignment will be acknowledged by the units • responding. A' system alert will notify the dispatcher of a unit failing to respond to a moveup request within thirty (39)'�spnds. 005' Map Coverage Display The Map Coverage dtsplay may be activated on a working video display unit using the _COVER special function key. The display will consist of a schematic map of the Contra Costa Consolidated Fire District. The display will include station status at the relative geographic location of the stations. Active incidents will be displayed using the letter X at the approximate location of the map coordinate on .the schematic map. Stations without units or crews will be displayed in reverse video to indicate lack of coverage. The Map Coverage Display will be updated by the computer whenever status updates are made. Summary of Active Incidents Disjay The Summary of ,Fictive Incidents dspl<ay ,can be brought up on the working video display units by depressing the SUMRY function key. The display will consist of two parts. The upper portion of the display will list one line summaries of incidents in queue awaiting dispatch. The incident in queue summary will include the incident number, location, station area, type of incident and time of alarm. These incidents will be placed in order by- incident type. and time of alarm with the higher priority„incidents shown first. �� tr • The lower portion of the display will show two line summaries of incidents and the currently assigned units. The first line will show' the incident number, location, station area, type of incident' and. time of arrival of the first unit on the scene. The second line will show the units assigned to the incident in the order in which they are assigned. If necessary an additional line will be used to insure that all assigned units are displayed. If the display requires more than twenty-two (22), lines, paging will be required to show the entire contents of the display. This display will automatically be updated by the computer. Hydrants Out of Service Display The Hydrant Out of Service Display may be activated on a working video display unit by depressing the HYDRNT function key. It will show a numbered . list of hydrants currently out of service. The list will include hydrant locations, .grid coordinates,and the date and time they were placed out of service. The bottom line of the display will be used to add or delete entries from this display. The cursor will be positioned after the title "ADD - A, DELETE - D, line number. To add a hydrant to the list, the following entry may be made. • r ; 000 - s tiOO '1r6 k Y 7 ~ � $ f= � ENTRY: A SEND The computer will temporarily clear the display and position the cursor on line three (3) after the title HYDRANT LOCATION. ENTRY: hydrant, address , intersection or building, SEND Location aids and error correction features as described for entering the reported location of the alarm in the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch display may be used to enter the hydrant location. The location will be verified by the computer and the grid coordinates of the location supplied. After a valid location has been entered, the computer will redisplay the Hydrants Out of Service Display with the new entry added to the end of the list. To delete a hydrant from the list, the following entry may be made: ENTRY: D, line number, SEND EXAMPLE: D G SEND The computer will clear that line from the screen, collapse the list to remove the space, and renumber the remaining lines. If no addition or deletion is to be made, the SEND key . must be depressed to reposition the cursor on line two (2) . } 057 qg-2111"�Pfi Closed Streets Display Closed Streets Display may be activated on a working video display unit by depressing the STREET function key. It will Show a numbered list of streets currently' closed. For each closed street, the street name, address range and cross streets ,between which the street is closed and the date and time the entry was made will be shown. The bottom line of the display will be used to add to or delete entries from this display. The cursor will' be positioned after the title ADD -. A, DELETE - D, line number. To add a closed street to the list, the following-entry may be made: ENTRY: A SEND The computer will temporarily clear the display and position the cursor on line three (3) after the title STREET NAME, ENTRY: Street name , start intersection, stop intersection The street name may then be entered in the same way as in the Alarm Receipt and Dispatch display. After the street name has been entered and verified, a numbered list of cross streets and address range between intersections will be dis- played. Two numbers must then be entered which are the lines showing the cross streets and address range between which the street is closed, The SEND key is then depressed com- pleting the eP?t*1r k)iVhe computer will then redisplay the Closed Street Display with the new entry at .k:he bottom of • the list. To delete , a street from the list, - the following entry is made, ENTRY: D, line number, SEND EXAMPLE D 2 SEND The -computer will.-clear that line from, the ,screen, ;collapse the list. to . remove ;the, space and renumber the, reamining lines. If no addition or deletion is to be made, the SEND key must be depressed to reposition the cursor on line tao (2) . Fumigation Location Display The Fumigation Location display -may be activated on a working video display unit by depressing the FUMIG special function key. The display ,will show a numbered list of loca- tions where fumigation is currently being performed. The list will include the street address and the date and time when each entry was made. The bottom line of the display will be used to add to .or delete entries from this display. The cursor will be positioned after the title ADD - A, DELETE - D line number. 0U5'1 r t Wur • To add a fumigation location to the list, the following entry may be made: ENTRY: A SEND The computer will temporarily clear the display and position the cursor on line three (3) after the title STREET ADDRESS. ENTRY: street address , modifier, The address may be entered using the location aids described previously. To delete a fumigation location from the list, the following entry may be made : ENTRY: D line number. EXAMPLE: D 15 SEND The computer will clear that line from the screen, collapse the list to remove the space and renumber the remaining lines. If no addition or deletion is to be made, the SEND key must be depressed to reposition the cursor on line two (2) Menu Display The Menu Display is brought up on any working video display units by entering the word menu while the cursor is on line two (2) . This display will list system displays , major functions, fire type codes and their meanings , geographic data standards, and command mnemonics and their • meanings. Lill OU h EA �e Si MAI �J� 1'At�O11 TRANSPORTATION AND 9 9 PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION •GW a Gulf+Western Manufacturing Company 8004 Cameron Road Austin,Texas 78753 512-837-8300 Telex 77-8498 PRICE PROPOSAL J? , CONTRA COSTA COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH SYSTEM V, - f MAY 30, 1978 00531 Yeg'30��tfzY�r ��zt'�a'y 2ti« '•I fib' t3i Pr, �1 - ti '"£)`r.r3' ' $ ?3i�F�'q,y�9 k X; � .ti �{ w r•S W:3 a T59 17=7 r 1: • Price Proposal Index 1. 0 Price Proposal 1 .1 Basic System - Deliverables E 1. 2 Option - Deliverables 1. 3 Costs Basic System 1. 4 Costs - Options A 582 Price Proposal Eagle Signal Corporation, a 'Gulf + Western Manufac- turing Company,,' is 'pleased to' quote the following prices for a Computer Aided DispatchSystem and Options . The system proposed will be designed to improve the ability of the Contra Costa Fire Protection District to provide the public with fast, accurate and effective fire fighting services. The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will include all necessary hardware, software', documentation, training, installation and warranty services . It will be provided under a turnkey arrangement in which Eagle Signal will furnish a completely operational system. Basic System The basic Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System will be furnished as a completely operational system as described in the Technical Description, Section IV of the Bid Proposal. The basic system will include the following deliverable items : Item 1 - Hardware Quantity Description 1 Set Nova 3D Mini-Computer with 64k Words MOS Parity Memory Real Time Clock OQ5 3 • Input Output Board V fk +� SSS ! 'S f- f 5. xu➢ Quantity Description (1 Set) Communications Chassis 16 Line Multiplexer. 16 Line ESA Automatic .Program Load Power Fail/Automatic Restart Memory: ,Management and Protection 1 Cartridge Disk Subsystem 10 MB 5 Megabyte Removable Disk Storage 5 Megabyte Fixed Disk Storage 4 Drive Controller 2 Disk Cartridges 1 Dual Diskette Subsystem 4 Drive Controller 2 Drives 8 Diskettes . 315 Megabyte 1 Master Terminal Printer Sixty (60) Character Per Second 132 Column' Line 5 x 7 Dot Matrix 128 Character ASC11. Upper and Lower Case 1 Serial Matrix Printer 165 Characters Per Second 132 Column Line 5 x 7 Dot Matrix Full ASC11 Interface 2 Cabinet .Enclosures 19 Rack Cabinet Blower 425 ,CFM Circuit Breaker 70 9/16" High x 30" Deep x 25 1/4 " Wide Casters and Anti-Tip Legs 5 Video Display Units/Keyboards 15" CRT 3 Video Display Units/Monitors 15" CRT 1 Real Time Disk Operating System (RDOS) 0058,1 it Item 2 - Software Design and Test Item Function 1 Log On/Log, ;Off 2 Alarm Receipt and Dispatch 3 Move-Ups .4 _ :• Map Coverage 5 . Unit ,Status. 6, ,,Mutual Aid -Status, ,Incident Status, i_ 8 System Alerts 9 Hydrant Status 10 Closed Streets Status 11 Fumigation -Status 12 Data Base Files 13 Message Fides 14 Quick Reference Files 15 Training Mode Item 3 - Project Management and Support Item Function 1 Project Coordination and Scheduling 2 Pro 'ect ,Accountin 3 System Test, and Check Out 4 ,Training and , Documentation 5. Field support Y 00 r5 ' ; i Item 4 - Warranty Service Item Function 1 On Call Maintenance 2 Software Support Services Options The Contra Costa Computer Aided Dispatch System may be further enhanced by the addition of the options as described in the Technical Description, Section IV, of the bid pro- posal . The options will be provided as described in the bid proposal . The options will include the following de- liverable items : Item 1 - Mobile Status System Option A Quantity Description 60 Reporter III M/ETA/IOU-03 MOTRAC/MOCOM 70 Channel Sensing Mobile Radio Interface Cable, 7 ' 1 Base Encoder/Decoder Computer Interface Unit 1 Test Set and Accessories 3 Spare Parts Kit/Mobile 1 Spare Parts Kit/Base Encoder Item 2 - Mobile Status System Stand Alone Option B Quantity Description 60 Reporter III M/ED/IOU-03 MOTRAC/MOCOM 70 Channel Sensing Mobile Radio Interface Cable , 7 ' 1 Status Controller 1 Base Encoder/Decoder Computer Interface Unit Was J Quantity Description 1 Test Set and Accessories 1 Video Display Unit with Keyboard 3 Spare Parts Kit/Mobiles 1 Spare Parts Kit/Base Encoder 1 Spare Parts Kit/Status Controller Item , 3 ;7., Radio ,Box Interface Quantity Description 1 Radio ,Box Interface Controller Board Cables, Connectors Item 4 - Station Printer System Quantity Description 19 Hardcopy Printers 19 Station Modem/Controllers 19 Communications Center Modems 1 Computer Interface 2 Cabinet Enclosures - 1 Spare Printer. 1 Spare Modern/Controller 1 Spare Communications Center Modem Item 5 - Magnetic Tape Unit Ttem 6 - Dual Disk Cartridge .,),el s l(�0 Item 7 - Statistical Reports. Software Item 8 - Fire Personnel Recall Tile Software . Item 9 - Dual Computer System/ old Back-Up Quantity Description 1 Set Nova 3D Mini-Computer 64k Words MOS Parity Memory Real Time Clock Input/Output Board Automatic Program Load Power Fail/Automat`ic Restart Memory Management and Protection Asynchtbnot 8,,-Line Controller EIA Interface Input/Output "Interface Assembly Line Printer Controller 1 Dual Port Disc Option 1 Printer, 60 CPS Master Terminal a Cabinet Enclosure Set up, check out, and one year on call service included. Item 10 ,- Training Capabilities Software Item 11 - Uninterruptable Power Supply Charger/Inverter Batteries Transfer Switch ,q. 4 A Costs-Basic System The price for each major deliverable item as described in the bid proposal , and not including county or bay area sales tax, will be as follows : Item 1 Hardware ;Net 'Cost $ 87 ,386 . 00 Item 2 _ : ,Software Design,� and Test Net Cost $ 5'4,/'669 . 00 Item 3 Project Management and Support Net Cost $ 41, 076 . 00 Item 4 Warranty Service Net Cost $ 9 , 760 . 00 Item 4A Warranty Service' - Year 2 Net Cost $ 18 , 048 .00 Total Cost 1-4 Above (Not including 4A) $ 192 ; 891 . 00 1% California` State Sales Tax $ 1 , 928 . 91 Costs-Options • The price for each deliverable option item as described in the bid proposal will be as follows: Item 1 Mobile Status System Option A Net Cost $ 75 , 356 . 00 1% :California State Sales Tax $ 753 . 56 Item 2 ,Mobile Status System Option B Net Cost $ 97 , 045 . 00 1% -California State Sales Tax $ Item 3 Radio Call Box Interface Net Cost $ 13 , 040 .00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 30 .40 Item 4 Station Printer System Net Cost $ 76 , 649. 00 1$ California State Sales Tax $ 766 . 49 Item 5 Magnetic Tape Unit Cost $; :16!, 336 .00 Deduct Diskette Subsystem $ (-:5!,850 .00) Net Cost $ 10, 86. 00 1% Cali fornia' State Sales Tax Item 6 Dual Disk Cartridge Net Cost $ 21 , 300. 00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 213 . 00 Item 7 Statistical Reports Software Net Cost $ 12, 975 . 00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 129.75 00590 Item 8 Fire Personnel Recall File Software Net Cost, $ 3 , 505.00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 35 .05 Item 9 Dual Computer System/Cold Back-Up Net Cost $ 52 , 640 .00 l� Caii£ornia State Sales Tax $ 526 .40 Item 10 Training Capabilities Software Net Cost $ 8 ,882 .00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 98 .�� Item 11 Uninterruptible Power Supply 7 .5 KVA Net Cost $ 21,352 .00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 213 . 52 Additional Prices Spare Parts--Basic System Net Cost $ 2 , 520 .00 1% California State Sales Tax $ 25.�!Q Electrical Modifications--Basic System Estimate $ 2 ,800 .00 Raised Floor Estimate $ 2 ,100 .00 Outbuilding for UPS System Estimate $ 6 , 300 .00 005( 4 j y�i i F y { _, a ��: it T� � i ts�? .`t �' •,y, ' 1; 'a; a4 f^��'C, ,'�r �e :{ � u. ;r + k : ���{� ,� T r � Software iChancles Current Rate/Hour. $ 27 . 00 Software Changes -'�Afttic'ipate'd%,Future Rate/Hour $ 30 . 20 .,r `o' 80014 CAMERON RD � AUSTIN TX. 78753 1-014396ti160 06/09/78 TLX EAGLE SIG AUS OAKA . 01 AUSTIN TX JUNE 9 f ZIP ROY A BELL INSPECTOR C CONTRA COSTA CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT x 2010 GEARY ROAD PLEASANT HILL CALIF 94523 DEAR MR BELL : EAGLE SIGNAL CORPORATION HEREBY QUOTES THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT C OPTION DEDUCTIONS : �• ITEM ONE : MOBILE STATUS SYSTEM OPTION A MODEL M/ED/IOU-03 REPORTER III WITH SEVEN-FOOT CABLE V 28-0015-02 NET COST SIX HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($650 . 00) EACH UP TO TEN ) 10) UNITS MAY BE DEDUCTED ITEM FOUR : STATION PRINTER SYSTEM HARDCOPY PRINTER STATION MODEM/CONTROLLER COMMUNICATIONS CENTER MODEM �. NET COST/SET THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED AND SIXTY FIVE DOLLARS ($3165. 00) EACH UP TO THREE (3) SETS MAY BE DEDUCTED, TERMS AND CONDITIONS WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED FOR THE REMAINING OFFER. TAXES ARE. NOT INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE AMOUNTS, � VERY TRULY YOURS, ROBERT E SMITH t PRODUCT SPECIALIST EAGLE SIGNAL CORPORATION ( 11 : 04 EST j(�� qQ ( MGMCOMP MGM 00192 C j EXHIBIT C �,Si r1 " f tt,} 5Sf S �}r t� r,t`� 'r r � �T .', '" rtil• ex F . . _ 8�' MAIL��RAD1 SCF RSV P' E; '^E Fi�R F; TF i ii i i T(>>R Pl Y, W F�J NUN .,TO aFF�E _PNONESNII� m. Eagle Si nal Corporation TRANSPORTATION AND ' N PUBLICSAFETY DIVISION a Gulf+Western Manufacturing Company 8004 Cameron RoadAustin,Texas 78753 512.837.8300 Telex 77-6498 June 12, 1978 Contra Costa Consolidated Fire Protection District 2010 Geary Road Pleasant Hill, Calif. 94523 Attn: Roy Bell, Inspector Dear Mr. Bell: , Per Contra Costa discussions with Mr. Jack Schlaefli regarding a proposed contract for a Computer Aided Dispatch System, Eagle Signal hereby verifies the following milestone payment amounts: 1) System Description Complete Net Cost $16,730.00 Less 10% Retainage $1,674.00 Cost $15,056.00 2) System Demonstration Includes: Basic CAD Mobile Status Option A (50 heads) Station Printer System (16 stations) Radio Box Interface Dual Disk Unit Complete Labor and Management Net Cost $293,278.00 Less 10% Retainage $29,328.00 Cost $263,950.00 3) System Accepted Net Cost $53,233.00 Less 10% Retainage $5,323.00 Coat $47,910.00 Total Project Cost $377,750.00 Less Retainage $36,325.00 Total Milestone Billing $341,425.00 • EXHIBIT D 00593 _p"yp yiglla� HAFFIG COW1110 S C d} ai11$�N6��� 4 Ch1 RGENCY Cpm Nlc >g; UNIC�TIQNS � � Contra Costa Consolidated Fire Protection District • Pg. 2 Attached is a revised project schedule reflecting the incorporation of the Mobile Status and Printer and associated options of the proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Robert E. Smith Product Specialist cc: Jack Schlaefli RES/gm o05s� . CONSOLIDA(GD FTltt PROJECT DURATION IS FROM 7/ 3/78 TO 8/ 1/79 CAD SYSILM CRITICAL PATH-15 275 WORKING DAYS - - -WORKING SCHLDUI_E 6/ 9/78 REVISION - O- - - SORT - MASTER SCHEDULE-- -- -" - - - - PACE NO. 1 -- ON I J AREA ACT EARLY EARLY LATE LATE CP NODE NODE CODE ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION MEN-- DUR SLACK =-START FINISH START - •---FINISH REEP014 -~�- - CP 100 110 I DETAILED"SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 0 20 - O "" 7/ 3/78 ---7/31/78--- - --7Y-3176-- 7/31/78 EAG CP 110 120 PIS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION COMPLETE 0 1 0 8/ 1/78 8/ 1/76 8/ 1/76 8/ 1/78 GAG 120 40U D DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT 0 100 40 8/ 2/78 12/21/78 9/28/78 2/20/79 CFD - 120 500 C ROOM MODIFICATIONS—-- - .-- -0- 40 - 163 - -'B/'2/78-----9/27/78'- -' 3/26/79---•5tl8/79 EAG 120 600 P STATION PRINTER ENGINEERING 0 20 101 8/ 2/78 8/29/78 12/26/78 1/23/79 EAG ` 120 200 0 PLACE EQUIPMENT ORDERS 0 5 95 8/ 2/70 0/ 8/78 12/15/70 12/21/78 EAG sf ' CP 120 300 SW SOFTWARE-DEVELOPMENT—-- - -- - 0 - 140 -- -0---0/-2/78-2/20/79- ------S/--2/78 -•2/20/79 - -EAG " 120 505 S ORDER MOBLE STATUS EQUIP. 0 10 86 8/ 2/78 B/15/78 12/ 4/78 12/15/78 EAG 200 220 0 VDU PROCUREMENT 0 40 116 8/ 9/78 10/ 4/78 1/24/79 3/21/79 EAG W - 200 210 O COMPUTER-HARDWARE-PROCUREMENT- 0-- 60- 95- -6/-9/78--1Y/ '1-/78"'- 12/22/78--`3/20/79----EAG H- 505 510 .S MOBLE STATUS MANUFACTURING 0 80 86 8/16/78 12/ 7/78 12/18/78 4/11/79 CC11 H r 600 610 P STATION PRINTER MANUFACTURING 0 60 101 8/30/78 11/22/78 1/24179 4/16/79 EAC al 210 230 PIS HARDWARE-RECEIVED--- - '----'-- -0- - 1-'-- 95 --11/ 2/76—Y1/'x/78-----'-3Y21/79- " 3/21/%9 "' "EAG 610 900 P PRINTER SYSTEM INTEGRATION 0 20 101 11/24/78 12/21/78 4/19/79 5/16/79 EAG 510 520 S SHIP MOBLE STATUS TO EAGLE 0 5 06 12/ 8/78 12/14/78 4/12/79 4/16/79 CCM _-- 520 900 S STATUS SYSTEM INTEGRATION "- -- - 0•--- 20— 86 --12/15/78'--1f 15/79 - - 4/19/79 - 5/16/79 '' EAC 400 410 MS DATA BASE COMPLETE 0 1 40 12/22/78 12/22/78 2/21/79 2/21/79 CFD CP 300 310 11S SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMPLETE 0 1 0 2/21/79 2/21/79 2/21/79 2/21/79 ENG - CP 310 320 SW SOFTWARE-TESTING---• -------0----20----0---2/22/79 --3/21/-79--2/22-/79---3/21/79 - EAG* 310 330 M PREPARE MANUALS 0 20 40 2/22/79 3/21/79 4/19/79 5/16/79 EAG CP 230 900 I SYSTEMS INTERGRATION 0 40 0 3/22/79 5/16/79 3/22/79 5/16/79 EAC - - CP 900 910 PIS SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION--- " - --0--2 -- 0---5/17/%9-----5/18/79--- --'-5/17/79-'-5/18/79' - EAG CP 910 920 I SHIP TO CONSOLODATED 0 10 0 5/21/79 6/ 4/79 5/21/79 6/ 4/79 EAG 920 950 I OPERATOR/MAINT. TRAINING 0 10 31 6/ 5/79 6/16/79 7/19/79 8/ 1/79 EAC CP 920 930 I SYSTEM -INSTALLAT30N----"------"----0 20---0-•--6/--5/79--7/ 2/-79-6-/-5/7't'-7/--2/79- EAG -- �\'^Tr11 ACCEPTANCE TEST 0 20 0 7/ 3/79 7/31/79 7/ 3/79 7/31/79 EAC CP 940 950 MS SYSTEM ACCEPTED 0' 1 0 S/ 1/79 8/ 1/79 8/ 1/79 8/ 1/79 CFD VD J Tr CONSOLIDATEO FIRE PROJECT DURATION IS FROM 7/ 3/78 TO B/ 1/79 CAD SYSTEM CRITICAL PATH'-IS 275 WORKING DAYS . WORKING SCHEDULE 6/ 9/78 REVISION -0-- - - SORT - CRI'TICAL PATH - --- - - PAGE NO. 1 I ON I J AREA ACT EARLY EARLY LATE LATE CP NODE NODE CODE - ACTIVITY-DESCRIPTION• - MEN--DUR-••SLACK- --START -----FINISH -- — START ---•-FINISH - - F.ESPON - l -- --------- ---- - -------------- • -~- CP 100 110 I DETAILED-SYSTEM-DESCRIPTION---~-0—•20 •- ••-•0---'7P-3f7B----?/31•/78• •-7•f 3f7B---7/31'/•78---•- EAG- - - `�• x CP 110 120 MS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION COMPLETE 0 1 0 B/ 1/78 B/ 1/78 B/ 1/78 B/ 1/78 EAG CP 120 300 SW SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT 0 140 O S/ 2/78 2/20/79 B/ 2/78 2/20/79 EAG x - CP 300 310 M5 SOFTWARE--DEVELOPMENT-COMPLETE- --- 0- 1 -- 0-- 2/21-/79--2/21/79••----—/21•/79 -2/21/79---- •EAO Cl, 310 320 SW SOFTWARE TESTING O 20 0 2/22/79 3/21/79 2/22/79 3/21/79 EAG CP 230 900 1 SYSTEMS INTERORATION 0 40 O 3/22/79 5/16/79 . 3/22/79 5/16/79 EAG y � � - CP 900 910 M5 SYSTEM •DEMONSTRATION-_ --_ ---- 0--- 2 -0- --5/1'7/79- -5/18/79 -- --5/47/79•--•-- b/18/79- - -EAG- -' CP 910 920 I SHIP TO CONSOLODATED 0 10 0 5/21/79 6/ 4/79 5/21/79 6/ '4/79 EAG �r' CP 920 930 I SYSTEM INSTALLATION 0 20 0 6/ 5/79 7/ 2/79 6/ 5/79 7/ 2/79 EAG ; _.CP 930 940 I SYSTEM-ACCEPTANCE-TEST- --0---2C)----0-7/--3/79--7/31-/79---7,0'-3/-79-7/31/79 EAC .0 CP 940 950 MS SYSTEM ACCEPTED 0 1 0 B/ 1/79 B/ 1/79 S/ 1/79 B/ 1/79 CFD -- , f f t 7 y S. ' S u` a %ONSOLIDATED FIRE PROJECT DURATION IS FROM 7/ 3/78 TO 8/. 1/79 - CAD SYSTEM CRITICAL PATH IH 275 WORKING DAYS y WO,7KING SCHEDULE b/ 9/78 REVISION 'O _,�__. _ _ _ SORT — MILESTONES - ---- - - —------PAGE NO. 1 ON I J AREA ACT EARLY EARLY LATE LATE - CP NODE NODE CODE ACTIVITY-DESCRIPTION HEN - DUR SLACK START - --`FiNISH• ---START - FINISH RESPON " -- --------- ---- - CP 110 120 MS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION-COMPLETE 0 1 0 8/ 1/713 S/ 1/713 "B/ '1/7H' -8/,1/713 EAG 210 230 MS HARDWARE RECEIVED 0 1 95 11/ 2/78 11/ 2/70 3/21/79 3/21/79 EAC 400 410 MS DATA BASE COMPLETE 0 1 40 12/22/78 12/22/78 2/21/79 2/21/79 CFD — CP 300 310 MS SOFTWARE DEVELOPHENT-COMPLETE- . '-O 1 ' O' - -2/21/79'"•-2/21/79' -"7/21/79- --2/21/79 EAC CP 900 910 MS SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION O 2 O 3/17/79 3/10/79 5/17/79 5/18/79 CAG `- CP 940 950 MS SYSTEM ACCEPTED _ O 1 0 - S/ 1/79 B/-1/79 - S/r1/79 _8/ 1/79 --` CFD J ri r r .n.. r 1 .f A, CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROJECT DURATION IS FROM 7/ 3/70 TO 8/ 1/7I -" CAD SYSTEM CRITICAL PATH IS 275 WORKING DAYS WORKING SCHEDULE 6/ 9/7B REVISION0- --- - - - -SORT'- HAST SCHED 'HARCHART - - - PACE NO. KEY: �ra -- XXXX - DURATION OF f*ON-CRITICAL-ACT. DATE 7/~3• _.__.__ ~_ _-.. __. .__... _ ___..._..- 1�� = SLACK FOR NON'^-CRITICAL ACT. CCCC = DURATION OF CRITICAL ACT. DAY 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 _ . . _ .._�� .-_ _ _._.-.I--•--I-...._ L—..-.i_----I--- - I I------I---••-I---•-I•-•--I .___.I_._.. _I. I .. __ 100 110 I DETAILED SYSTCM DESCRIPTION EAG CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCP r . 110 120 MS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION COMPLETE EAG I. . . . I.... I. . .. I.. ..C - IPO 400 D DATA BASE DEVELOPMENT—— --CFD- i::::3 :-I:.- 1:—IXXXXXXXX%XXXXXXY1t_'XXXXXX"XXXXXXX-XXAXXAx:: 1?O 500 C ROOM MODIFICATIONS EAG I... . I.... I.. .. I.;... IxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 120 600 P STATION PRINTER ENGINEERING EAG I. .. . I... . I... . I. .. . ixxxxxxxXXXXXXXxxxxxx//.////////////i. 120 200 0 PLACE EQUIPMENT-ORDERS EAO I-.—. 120 300 SW SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT EAG I... . I... . I.... I.. . . ICPGPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPGPCPi - i 120 505 S ORDER MOBLE STATUS EQUIP. EAG I. ... I. . . . I.. .. I.. .. IXXXXXXXXXX///////////////////////////i. —200 220 O VDU Pl'iucultEME - EAG--i---I. . . . i.-- 1.. . . 1--:-IXXXXXXX%XXXXXXXXXX%XXXXXXXxxr.v""_••"'-'-••--• ' 200 210 0 COMPUTER HARDWARE PROCUREMENT EAG I.. .. I... . I. . .. I.. .. I... . 1xxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"'''' 505 510 S MOBLE STATUS MANUFACTURING CCM I. ... I. .. . I. .. . I. ... I. . -. I. . .. IXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, •600 610 P STATION PRINTER-MANUFAC'TUR'ING EAG'---L... I::--I.---L . . . I. . . . I. . . . 2--1':-"IXXXXXXXXXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt..::-" 210 230 MS HARDWARE RECEIVED EAG I. . . . I. ... I.. . . I. . .. I.... I... . I... . I. ... I. . . . I.. . . I. .. . I. .. . I. . . . I. .. . I. 610 900 P PRINTER SYSTEM INTEGRATION EAG I.. . . I... . I. . .. I. . .. I. . . . I. .. . I.. . . I. ... I. . . . I. . . . I. . . . r . . . I. . . . I.. . . I --- 510 520 S SHIP MOBLE-STATUS--30--EAGLE— --CCM--l.. I:--I... . I:-:-L---I:'::--I:--'I.:•:-I�.-::-I.":::•I:: . . I: ::.' 520 900 S STATUS SYSTEM INTEGRATION EAG L.. . L.. . i. . .. I. . . . L .. . L. . . L. . . L . . . T. . . . L . .. L . . . L . .. I. . . . I. . L . �. 400 410 MS DATA BASE COMPLETE CFD I. . ,. I. I. . . . I.. . . I. . . . I.. .. I. .. . I.. .. I. . . . I. .. . I. . .. I. . . . I.. . . T. . . . I. . .. " -•--300 310 MS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT-COMPLETE--EAG--l..—.. I: . . 1.. . . L. . . I. . . .T... . I-..-I... . I:---I --L•---I::': I::':: T. : .-:`T.�: . . 310 330 SW SOFTWARE TESTING EAG I. .. . 1..:. I. . . . I. . . . I.. . . I.. . . I... . I.. . . I. . . . 1. . . I... . I. . . . L . . . I. . . . L . .. y 310 330 M PREPARE MANUALS EAG I. ... 1. . . . I. . . . I. . . . I. .. . I. . . . I.. .. I.. .. I. . . . I. . . . I. . . . L . . . I. . . . I. . . . I. . - 230 900 I SYSTEMS- INTERGRATION - -EAO—I.-- ---1-...I- 900 910 MS SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION EAC I. .. I.. . . I. .. . I.. .. I. . . I. . .. I. . . I. .. . I. . . . I. . . I. .. . . .. I. I. I. T_ - 910 920 I SHIP TO CONSOLODATED EAG I. ... L . .. I.. . . I.. . . I.... I. .. . I. ... I. . .. I. . .. I.. .. I. .. . I. . .. I. . . . I. . . . I. . . . -• 920 950 I OPERATOR/MAINT.—TRAINING— EAG - -1. . ..-I:-r- :I—.: I:-:-I::-:-I 920 930 1 SYSTEM INSTALLATION EAG I. ... I... . I.. .. I. . . . I... . I. .. . I. . . . I. I. . .. I. . . . I. .. . I. . .. I. . . . I. 930 940 I SYSTEM ACCEPTANCE TEST EAG I. . . . I.. . . I. . . I. . . . I. . . . I. . . . I. .. . I. . .. I. . . . I. . . . I. . .. I. . . . I.. . . 1. . . . T. .. . 2 940 950 MS SYSTEM ACCEPTED —CFO--I.. . . i_:. .-I:-- DAY 1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 61 66 71 w DATE 7/ 3 10/11 5? _ - _ al r �t. LONSOLIDATED FIRE PROJECT DURATION IS FROM 7/ 3/78 TO 8! 1/79 =` CAD SYSTEM CRITICAL PATH IS 275 WORKING DAYS W8RKINO SCHEDULE b/ 9/78 REVISION 0 — — SORT MAST SCHED DARCHART PAGE NO. 2 DATE 10/18 — — _ _._ .. _.__.._... 4/ 3 DAY 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 '141 146 151 '156 161 166 171 176 181 186 191 I I I I ..__.1, ._..L-- I I- I• I I I I I•-• I. I I ._. .I — - I• •---I I I I I 100 110 I •110 120 I 120 400 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/////////////////////•f/f//////////////// -- — - - - 120 500 -` 120 600 -- — 120 200 120 300 CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCP .120 505 — 200 220 200 210 505 510 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////`/'' ' 600 610 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt/-//////////////////////////////t//ff////t/f////!/!////f///!///////////!/!/!!/////!////!//! 210 230 I.. . . I. . . . 610 900 I. . . . I. . .. I.... I.... I.... IXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX///!!!!!//////////////////!I//////////I//!//!///!!/////////////!. O b10 020 1. .. .T. . . . I..: b20 900 I. . . . I. ... I.... I.... I.... I.... I.... I. ... IXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX//////////I/////////////!/!1111!!: - 400 41Q I. . . . I. . .. I. ... I. . .. I.. .. I.... I.... I.... I.... ---- 300-�310 I. . . . I. ... I:.::I--1. . . I:---I...r 1:.:..-I..—"I:.. . I:. .:I. —Ir.—I— F --L- I. .r.-IC-.---- 310 --310 320 1. .. . I. . .. I.... I... . I. . .. I.... I.... I.. .. I.... I... . I.. .. I. . .. I.... I. ... I.... I. . .. I. .. . I.CPCPCPCI- 310 330 1. . . . I. . .. I.... I.... I.... I.. .. L ... I.... I.... I... . I.. .. I.... I. ... I.... I.... I... . I. . ..•I. XXXXXXXA.- - -- 230 900 I. . . . I. . . . I. . .. I:- 900 910 I. . . . I. . . . I.... I.... I. . .. I.... I.... I.... I.... I... ..I... . I.. .. i. .. . I.... I... . I.. . . T. 910 920 I. . . . I. .. . I. ... I.... I. .. . I.... I.... I. ... I... . I. .. . I.... I.. .. I.. .. I.... I.. .. I.. .. I ` 920 950 I. . . . I. . . . I.-. :. I:,---L— :-L :.. I: ..: I:::. L::-r•I:.. . L. : : I: :: L .-.-: Ir. .:I.:: I::-. .�I. . . 920 930 I. . . . I. .. . I. . . . I. .. . I. . . . I. ... I.... I.... I... . I.... I.. .. I... ..I.. . . I.. . . I. .. . I.. .. I. .. . ` 930 940 I. . . I.'. I:..: I.:.. I.... I. .. . I.. .. I.. . . I.... 1. . . . I.. .. I... . I. ... I... . I. ... I. ... I. . . . I. .. . T 940 900 1. . . . I. . .. 1. I DAY 76 81 86 91 96 101 106 111 116 121 126 131 136 141 146 151 156 161 166 171 176 18: DATE 10/10 i too 'CONSOLIDAT OM 7/ 3/70 Mia PRWECT� is rR' CAD SYSTEM FIRE ' CRITICAL PATHTISI� 270,WORKING DAY5 TO 8/ 1/79 WORKING SCHEDULE � 6/ 9/18 REVISION --0 _ SORT - MAST SCHED-DARCHART F!AGE t" , DALE 4/10 .rz� . DAY 196 201 206 211 216 221 226 231 236 241 246 251 256 26I 266 271 276 281 286 291 296 -. •... . i I I _. I_-_-•I.-_.....I . I-. I .- I . I . . I .I : I _I L I. I..--_I _ I ___ I '•I .:`: ;-���:. (. 100 110 I µ . 120 400 I 120 500 11111/111/1////!!///!/!////// 120 600 I 120 200 I 120 300 I 4 120 505 I rfr - .200 r.:-1 I , a 200 210 I 505 510 600 610 { 210 230 I z 610 9UU 510 520 520 900 400 410 I - 300 310 I 310 320 I 310 330 230 .900 CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPGPCPCfCPCPC 900 910 I. . . . I. . .. I.... I. I. . .. I.CPC. 910 92Q I. ... I. . .. I... . i:_%, .-I.».. I.:.CPCPCPCPCP yrf -- 920 95Q I. . .. C 920 930 1. . . . I. . . . I.... 1. .. I.... I.... I.... I...CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCP ; t 930 940 1. . . . I. . .. I.... I.... I. ... I. ... I. ... I. . .. I.... I.... I.. .. I.. .CPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCPCP ' 940 950 I. . . . I. . .. I•.-. ::—I:r.:—L . .. I::::F.:.rL—r::I:-:.: I::::—I:r:rI: :—I:r—L... L.—::-I.—.—.,C DAY 196 201 206 211 216 221 226 231 236 241 246 251 256 261 266 271 276 281 286 291x s DATA 4/10 f t� • moi} mF' • V � _. -- rte_•__. ... r—._ .. __ .. .i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCHING Contract price breakdown for 'deliverables per Eagle Signal Proposal, dated May 30, 1978, and Mailgram dated June 9, 1978. Item Hardware Services (Taxable) (Not taxable) Basic Computer Aided Dispatch System $ 87,386 $105,505 Mobile Status System with 50 status heads 63,248 5,608 Station Printer System with. 16 station printers 53,840 13,314 Radio Alarm Box Interface and System 4,800 8,240 Second Disk Option 13,944 7,356 Subtotal $223,218 $140,023 Sales Tax @6.5% 14,509 ------ Subtotal $237,727 ------ + Services 140,023 Total Contract Price $377,750 ' 00(;01 -' 00 a m � a y .. s yt;f,�,.� ,ri _>,.i f�cCitidr u ,Y1 r ` h r"FY J � �Q f "yt� �✓ 1 ...r T 4 x t+ �r�J'fKt` XiJ %,�>y}.1.J i� 4� r ++''• (4brkft!!�► k4` Yet.! .r;•n...P.t r�•.•+->'s. . }..w z Llsl�•.r; _',�arl-yr7t.'v..t�h+.yyib.�Y�'-!'.t1-zr,.^gF3v w�. L,� .1: ......��r+.��.. 1 ) (1 1i .1� �'I. it �' �'Ny i .�.I 771 .:11•.e �. .� .t 'iti=. ...'1 � j �.1� ? 4f s' f .Y vl.�R aln... NrtitE�FM.u•W..Sr1^!LC/.>'Y!"1lY�r�C>✓/.*Y�'C�a YY+Tgf.�`Lr1.rY }�. Jd.ata�.�'!'+f.w.�LaC)T - i 1, r.;,tnt AND azul„ss I�rXXXXK BROKER ALEXANDER & ALEXANDER INC. COMPANtE5 AFFORDING COVERAGES 1185 AVENUE OF THE AMMCAS Co111PANY n bV NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036 LL TT ER A AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. COMPANY Q LETTER VV NAME ASID ADDRESS OF INSURED COMPANY C�+ ' GULF + 14ESTEM INDUSTRIES, INC. AND ANY LETTER L+ t` AND ALL SUBSIDIARIES INCLUDING COMPANY D EAGLE SIGNAL CORPORATION LETTER ONE GULF + WE, PLAZA COMPANY d YORK, NEW YO LETTER am This is to certify that policies of insurance lister;below have been issued to the insured named above and are in force at this time. COMPANY " ' -- POLICY Limits of Llab ty in Thousands LETTER TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE GENERAL LIABILITY / / BODILY INJURY $ $ A LXJ COMPREHENSIVE FOPM 61AL195685 l/1(79 'i PRETitISES—OPERATIONS PROPERTY DAMAGE S $ [X flPLOS104 AND COLLAPSE X]t ITLi i)t:U Hr,larrJ t«}Dtt:i5tCOMPLETED OPr RATIONS BODILY INJURY AND N �X�rJ�TI cTvrL INSUR,:NCE PROPERTY DAMAGE $1,000 $2,000 J Bn•)4p FOFORMPROP'FRTy COMBINED (FRO(� 1N0!PcNDFN1 CU.N;RAC VIAS 1 IliJ PrRy;;11:A1 INYIPY PERSOt.AL INJURY $1,000 AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY BnDILY INJURY $ IE:.CH PERSON) ❑ Q�'!T'R;itEN�Iv'E FORr.t BODILY INJURY $ tEACHCT:CURRENCE) O'vtif r PRUYERTYDAMAGE s r. ❑ HIRFD UOP11 Y INJURY AND ❑ NOs+ PRDPEPTY DAMAGE $ COMBINED EXCESS LIABILITY HODILY INJURY AND �J UMBRELLA FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE S $ OTHt P THAN U'.EtPEIA A COMBINED FCR`.1 WORKERS'COMPENSATION STATUTORY and EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY OTHER C:tSCPIPTiLIN OF UP[RAT iOtiS.LOCATiONSNEHICLES CCCFPD is an additional insured with respect to work performed by Eagle Signal Corp, pursuant to and for the duration of the Agreement titled Computer Aided-Dispatching System. Cancellation: Snoul,l ,)n j of thic above de�;<:ribed policies be cancelled beforu the expiration date thereof, the issuing com- . v'(11rnde<Ivor to mai! _ _ days rlritttn notice to the below named Certificate holder, but failure to ” mail such notice Shrill Impose no obligation or liability Of any hind upon the company. NAME ANL)AOF Cf Rt II tCAT E FtULUER: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DATE ISSUE 716128 ` FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTf 2010 GEARY ROAD PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 006j1!j* RIz D ItEPRESENTATiVE ATTN: INSPECTOR RAY BELL !JAO icoT?tj _., i 31 PAUL FIRE and MARINE G SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA A CAPITAL STOCK COMPANY CONTRACT BOND BOND NO. 4com 5652-113 If nuw all men by these presents that we, EAGLE SIGNAL cORPORA.TioN, 8004 Cameron Road, Austin, Texas 78753 as Principal, and the ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota and duly authorized to transact business in the State of California as Surety,are held and firmly bound unto CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 2010 Geary Road, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 Y:. as Obligee, in the sum of TBM HUNDRED SEVENTY SEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY AND 00/100 t$377,750-00) DOLLARS, for the payment whereof well and truly to be made, the Principal and the Surety bind themselves, their heirs,executors,administrators,successors and assigns,jointly and severally,firmly by these presents. SIGNED,sealed,and dated this 30th day of Jane 19 78 . WHEREAS the Principal and the Obligee have entered into a written contract,a copy of which is or may be attached hereto,dated the 27th day of JUNE 1978 ,for furnishing and installing of the Computer Aided Dispatch System, County of Contra Costa, California NOVI,THEREFORE, the condition of the foregoing obligation is such that if the Principal shall indemnify the Obligee for all loss that the Obligee may sustain by reason of the Principal's failure to comply with any of the terms of said contract,then this obligation shall be void;otherwise it shall remain in force. Any suit under this bond must be instituted before the expiration of two(2)years from the date on which ORATION- - .final payment falls due. EAGLE-SI COU Principal ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY By John E. M 603 Attorney-in-Fact 10957 Rev.5-62 CORPORATION ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE ST.PAUL COMPANIES STATE OF......_......TSS t� COUNTY OF.........TAY. S._... ..............._........_......... ,...,...,....�...,.....,.,...,�.,, On this...............FIFTH. .._...».. .... .....day of ......-my _. ........ ......__.. .._.....................19.78.....before me personally came............_... ...........». ......to me known,who being by me duly sworn,did depose and say;that he resided in_...____.__Austin Texas ......................... that he is the....... ..._....... President of..........Eagle„Signal,. Corgol-atioa „....._... ,.the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument that he )wows the seal of said corporatign;'•that)thepfalaffixed to said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors gfisaid corporation,and that he signed his name thereto by like order. ..........»... ................L. ,I �.`...............Notary Public. Glori Morris. 10992 CAF Ed.2.56 Printed In U.S.A. My Commission expires-...,7cu)e. STATE OF NEW YORK � SURETY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT—N.Y. COUNTY OF New York ss: On the........................30 h......day of....................................Jl•MO.........................._...._in the year 19.78....,before me personally came ...................._.........._.........Zali!_.EIlah@Z;..__......_......_......_....___..__......_....to me known,who,being by me duly sworn,did depose and say that he resides in........................................nUitlOxlt.9...Kew_-an..a.............................._............._....._.. ;that he is the Attorney-in-Fact of the............ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY_..... ...,the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument;that he knows the seal of said corporation;that the seal affixed to said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation,and that he signed his name thereto by like order,and the affiant did further depose and say that the Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York,has,pursuant to Section 327 of the Insurance Law of the State of New York,issued to.........—ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY__.........his certificate of qualification,evidencing the qualification of said Company and its sufficiency under any law of the State of New York as surety and guarantor,and the propriety of accepting and approving it as such;and that such certificate has not been revoked. 11629 NYJ Rev.3.66 Notary Public 00604 St. Paul Fire and Maxine Insurance Company ' 385Washington Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Telephone (612) 221 7911 Property&Liability Insurance Financial Statement December 31, 1977 St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ASSETS LIABILITIES Bonds 1,447,793,574 Reserve for Unearned Premiums 4313,677,089 Stocks 275,434,773 Reserve for Unadjusted Losses 837,708,100 Cash and Bank Deposits 7,783,705 Reserve for Loss Adjustment Agents' Balances 1443,461,375 Expense 244,141,934 Due from Reinsurance Co's. Reserve for Taxes and Expenses 529115,638 and Notes 14,763,315 Dividends Declared and Unpaid 4,023,185 Other Investments 6,121,360 Statutory Reserve Adjustments 31,128,866 Funds on Deposit With Funds Held Under Reinsurance Associations and Stock Pools 78,668,352 Treaties 47,971,357 Accrued Interest and Dividends 28,7853,005 Other Liabilities 479020,808 Other Assets 4,518,100 Special Reserve Fund 1,000,000 Capital Stock 20,000,000 Surplus 291,542,584 311,542,584 2,008,329,564 2,008,329,564 Surplus to policyholders $311,542,584 Securities carried at $ 36,9530707 in the foregoing statement are deposited as required by law. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) J. E. Paulson, Vice President and Treasurer of the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insur- ance Company, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the above described officer of said Company; that said Company is a corporation duly organized, existing and engaging in business as a surety company under and by virtue of the Laws of the State of Minnesota, and has duly complied with all the requirements of the laws of said State applicable to said Com- pany and is duly qualified to act as Surety under such laws; that the above is a true state- ment of the Assets and Liabilities of said Company on the 31st day of December, 1977. J -E. Paulson, Vice President and Treasurer Subscribed and sworn to before me this -4/1f day of ht ' , 1978. 006043 Leonora K. Adams, Notary Public Ramsey County, Minnesota My Commission Expires September 7, 1984 Property and Liability Affiliates of The St.Paul Companies Inc.:St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company I St.Paul Mercury Insurance Company . The St.Paul Insurance Company I St.Paul Guardian Insurance Company I The St.Paul Insurance Company of Illinois - t Class 1 ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY (A Capital Stock Company) ST.PAUL,MINNESOTA Fidelity and Surety CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY Department Original on File at Home Office of Company. See Certification. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota,and having its principal office in the City of Saint Paul,Minnesota.does hereby constitute and appoint Donald B. Rodimer, Gladys V. Stauder, Robert J. Moroney, John E. Maher, Yarilyn Dalley, Marion R. Lowenthal, John M. Enright, individually, New York, New York its true and lawful attorneys(s)min-fact to execute,seal and deliver for and on its behalf as surety,any and all bonds and undertakings,recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,which are or may be allowed,required or permitted by law,statute,rule, regulation,contract or otherwise,and the execution of such instrument(s)in pursuance of these presents,shall be as binding upon the said St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,as fully and amply,to all intents and purposes,as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by its regularly elected officers at its principal office. This Power of Attorney is executed,and may be certified to and may be revoked,pursuant to and by authority of Article V.—Section 6(C),of the By-Laws adopted by the Board of Directors of the ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting called and held on the 23rd day of January,1970,of which the following is a true transcript of said Section 6(C). "The President or any Vice President,Assistant Vice President,Secretary or Resident Secretary,shall have power and authority (1) To appoint Attorneys-in-fact,and to authorize them to execute on behalf of the Company,and attach the Seal of the Company thereto, bonds and undertakings,recogn'tzances,contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof,and (2) To appoint Special Attorneys-in-fact,who are hereby authorized to certify to copies of any power-of-attorney issued in pursuance of this section and/or any of the By-Laws of the Company,and (3) To remove,at any time,any such Attorney-in-fact or Special Attorney-in-fact and rwoke the authority given him." Further,this Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors of said Company adopted at a meeting duly called and held on the 6th day of May,1959,of which the following is a true excerpt: "Now therefore the signatures of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such power of attorney or any certificate relating thereto by facsimile,and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by facsimile signatures and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company has caused this instrument to be signed and its corporate seal to be affixed by its authorized officer,this 30th day of August A.D.19 77 ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY STATE OF MINNESOTA r County of Ramsey ss. Vice President. On this 30th day of August 19 77 before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and, being by me duly sworn, said that he is the therein described and authorized officer of the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company;that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company;that the said Corporate Seal and his signature were duly affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said Company. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF.I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Saint Paul.Minnesota,the day and year fust above written. V.C.INNES Notary Public,Ramsey County,Minn. My Commission Expires April 27,1983 CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned officer of the St.Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company,do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of the Power of Attorney and affidavit,and the copy of the Section of the By-Laws of said Company asset forth in said Power of Attorney,*with the ORIGINALS ON FILE IN THE HOME OFFICE OF SAID COMPANY,and that the same are correct transcripts thereof,and of the whole of the said originals,and that the said Power of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full force and effect. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF.I have hereunto set my hand this 30th day of June 1978 00606 Secretary. *Unlimited as to character and amount. 10870 CPS Rev.10.70 Printed In U.S.A. r � C • r ♦ r In the Board of Supervisors. of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 14 78 In the Matter of Mental Health Contract Amendment Agreement 124-705-10 with We Care Society, Inc. for FY 77-78 Augmentation Funding The Board having approved (by its Order dated March'1.4, 1978) a, " one-time appropriation of $11,000 in County funding to permit We Care ..Society, Inc. to maintain its Day Treatment Center operations for the provision of mental health services to children in FY 77-78 under Mental Health Contract #24-705-9; and The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, regarding approval of an amendment to said contract to increase the County funding by $11,000 and to increase the County-funded services provided by We Care Society under said contract, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract Amendment Agreement #24-705-10 with We Care Society, Inc. , to increase the FY 77.-78 contract payment limit, effective May 1, 1978, from $202,808 to a new total of $213,808, for the provision of additional County-funded services, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said Contract Amendment Agreement, upon approval as to legal form by.the Office of the County Counsel. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct COPY of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ori g: Human Resources Agency Supervisors Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit affixed this 27th day of T ,n 19-21 .cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller County Mental Health Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor By � � .do=,�- . Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson gm H-244m15m 00607 a CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (Contra Costa .County Human Resources Agency) (� Number 2 4 — 7 V 5 1 V 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 24-705-9 Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Partial Day Treatment/Developmentally Disabled (Short-Doyle) Effective Date of Contract: July 1, 1977 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: WE CARE SOCIETY, INC. Capacity: Nonprofit California Corporation Address: 2191 Kirker Pass Road, Concord, California 94520 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is ;iav 1. 1978 4. Amendment Specifications. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the "Amendment Specifications" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. S. Legal Authority. This Contract Amendment Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Welfare and Institutions Code (division 5, part 2, the Short-Doyle Act) and California Administrative Code (Title 9, Subchapter 3, Community Mental Health Services under the Short-Doyle Act); California Government Code Section 26227 6. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. . COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By By gn Wxximxxa, Board of Supervisors Designee tMr Designate official capacity :in business . t. J. R. Olsson, Count and affix corporation seal.$ State of California ) County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor LReconnim nded by Human Resources Agency known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Forte Approved: County Counsel Dated: By ARTHUR W. WAisnn-A.j& Deputy 441tfa ,(A fQoudfv Clerk Microfilmed with board order VV VV AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS 1' C Number 2 4 ` O 5 1` O In consideration of Contractor's agreement to provide 600 additional units of service (for approximately 10 additional County-funded children) under the Contract identified herein, County agrees to increase the Contract Payment Limit by an additional $11,000. County and Contractor agree, therefore, to amend said Contract, effective May 1, 1978, as specified below, while all other parts of said Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect: 1. Payment Limit Increase. Paragraph 4. (Payment Limit) of the Contract. is hereby amended, effective May 1, 1978, by increasing the total amount payable to Contractor specified therein from $202,808 to the new total of $213,808. And the ' 12-month Payment Limit set forth in Paragraph 2. (Cost Report. and Settlement) of the Special Conditions is hereby increased from $202,808 to the new.total of $213,808 for the fiscal year period ending June 30, 1978. 2. Additional Service Units. Paragraph 11. (Number of Service Units) of the Service Plan is hereby amended, effective May 1, 1978, by increasing the number of service units specified therein (to be provided by Contractor during the 12-month fiscal year period ending June 30, 1978) from 8,000 to the new total of .8,600 service units. 3. Budget Revision. The Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures, as set forth in Paragraph 8. of the Service Plan, is hereby deleted, effective May 1, 1978,_ and replaced with the new, substitute Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Initials: ConkAactor County Dept. 00609 BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES (Short-Doyle Programs) C Number 2 4 — 7 O V 1 O' 12-MONTH 1. COST CATEGORIES. FISCAL YEAR PERIOD - a. Staff Salaries and Fringe Benefits $ 207,411 b. Operating Expenses 11,064 c. Administrative Charges (Allocated) -0- d. Liability Insurance 8,932 e. Other 46,205 TOTAL GROSS ALLOWABLE PROGRAM COSTS $ 273,612 [Adjustments in County's total payments to Contractor, in accordance with the Payment Provisions and Paragraph 2. (Cost Report and Settlement) of the Special Conditions, shall not be limited by the specific line item Cost Category amounts set forth above.] 2. Less Non-County Program Revenues. a. Client Fees & Insurance and Subvention Amounts ($ 59,804 ) To Be Collected and Provided By Contractor NET ALLOWABLE PROGRAM COSTS $ 213,808 b. Donations To Be Collected and Provided ($ -0- ) By Contractor 3. NET ALLOWABLE CONTRACT COSTS (Contract Payment Limit) $ 213,808 4. Less Special One-Time-Only County Grant Funding To Be Provided By County (3/14/78 Board Order) ($ 11,000 ) 5. Short-Doyle Funding To Be Provided By County Through Its FY 77-78 County Short-Doyle Budget $ 202,808 NOTE: County and Contractor agree that the budget set forth in the original Contract #24-705-9 contained errors, as follows: (1) The $54,192 amount originally budgeted on line 2.a. for "Client Fees & Insurance and Subvention Amounts" was in error and should have been $72,389. (2) The $18,197 amount originally budgeted on line 2.b. for "Donations" was in error and should have been zero. Initials: Con actor Zodn6y Dept. OQ 6io ` l • In the Board of Supervisors OT Contra Costa County, Stare of California June 27 , 79 78 In the Motter of Reserves for Self-Insurance of Public Liability and Workers' Compensation Risks. This Board having determined self-insuring of tort liability. and workers' compensation risks to be in the best interest-*of the County; and It having been resolved by this' Board that a pre-funded system be established whereby cash contributions would be made by the County into reserves from which losses are' to be paid; and The Board having decided not to purchase excess insurance due to the large premiums quoted, the probabilities involved, and the' financial capacity of the County to absorb losses; and It having been determined that in the absence of any insurance to protect the assets of the County such reserves should be adequate to cover normal anticipated losses plus an amount to meet unantici- pated losses or a catastrophic loss arising from a major single occurrence; and In order to reduce undue annual budget and financial burdens, but to protect against such unanticipated and catastrophic losses, sufficient reserves shall be accumulated over a period of years to that a large, single loss or series of unanticipated losses will not deplete such reserves. . 1. 'Tort Liability. It having been determined by this Board that reserves to cover unanticipated and catastrophic losses, aside and in addition to reserves carried forincurred losses (both reported and unreported) , and normal expected insurance costs , shall be allowed to accumulate to an amount not to exceed $5 million for tort liability risks, including automobile, general and medical malpractice exposures; and 2. Workers' Compensation. The Board having approved a self-insurance program for' the County, Contra. Costa County Fire Protection District, and Riverview Fire Protection District covering the workers' compensation risk of each public agency with no excess insurance protection afforded; and Reserves for the workers ' .compensation risk under this financial arrangement should include amounts set aside for incurred but not reported claims (estimated as 20 percent of the latest incurred loss year) and catastrophic occurrences (estimated on .the basis of 10 potential death claims for the CounCy, ' 6 for Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and 3 for Riverview Fire Protection District) ; and 00611 i BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES (Short-Doyle Programs) !`� COy, Number 24 — ` — 1 O 12-MONTH 1. COST CATEGORIES. FISCAL YEAR PERIOD a. Staff Salaries and Fringe Benefits $ 207,411 b. Operating Expenses 11,064 c. Administrative Charges (Allocated) -0- d. Liability Insurance 8,932 e. Other 46,205 TOTAL GROSS ALLOWABLE PROGRAM COSTS $ 273,612 [Adjustments in County's total payments to Contractor, in accordance with the Payment Provisions and Paragraph 2. (Cost Report and Settlement) of the Special Conditions, shall not be limited by the specific line item Cost Category amounts set forth above.] 2. Less Non-County Program Revenues. a. Client Fees & Insurance and Subvention Amounts ($ 59,804 ) To Be Collected and Provided By Contractor NET ALLOWABLE PROGRAM COSTS $ 213,808 b. Donations To Be Collected and Provided ($ -0- ) By Contractor 3. NET ALLOWABLE CONTRACT COSTS (Contract Payment Limit) $ 213,808 4. Less Special One-Time-Only County Grant Funding To Be Provided By County (3/14/78 Board Order) ($ 11,000 ) 5. Short-Doyle Funding To Be Provided By County Through Its FY 77-78 County Short-Doyle Budget $ 202,808 NOTE: County and Contractor agree that the budget set forth in the original Contract #24-705-9 contained errors, as follows: (1) The $54,192 amount originally budgeted on line 2.a. for "Client Fees & Insurance and Subvention Amounts" was in error and should have been $72,389. (2) The $18,197 amount originally budgeted on line 2.b. for "Donations" was in error and should have been zero. Initials: few Con actor Coun Dept. oosiLQ FR7CEVED J 1978 J_ P.. OLSSON CLERK aOAM O: SUPERVISORS CONI A CO. ....I Lf 3 ron 1 a, j _ 4 ate,._-, C; - 6`I(j_.-; zoo ;myr jw 1;6 - .. - -1 sr c- --- - .. � .� � . .. j i:Fv iia ` •'�1 - r:L t In the Board of Supervisors r Or Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Motter of Reserves for Self-Insurance of Public Liability and Workers' Compensation Risks. This Board having determined self-insuring of tort liability. and workers' compensation risks to be in the best interest-.of the County; and It having .been .resolved by this* Board that a pre-funded system be established whereby cash contributions would be made by the County into reserves from which losses are' to be paid; and The Board having decided not to purchase excess insurance due to the large premiums quoted, the probabilities involved, and the- financial capacity of the County to absorb losses; and It having been determined that in the absence of any insurance to protect the assets of the County such reserves should be adequate to cover normal anticipated losses plus an amount to meet unantici- pated losses or a catastrophic loss arising from a major single • occurreLce; and In order to reduce undue annual budget and financial burdens, but to protect against such unanticipated and catastrophic losses, sufficient reserves shall be accumulated over a period of years to that a large, single loss or series of unanticipated losses will not deplete such reserves. . 1. 'Tort Liability. It having been determined by this Board that reserves to cover unanticipated and catastrophic losses, aside- and in addition to reserves carried for incurred losses (both reported and unreported) , and normal expected insurance costs, shall be allowed to accumulate to an amount not to exceed $5 million for tort liability risks, including automobile, general and medical malpractice exposures; and 2. Workers' Compensation. The Board having approved a self-insurance program for the County, Contra Costa County Fire Protection Distriat, and Riverview Fire Protection District covering the workers' compensation risk of each public agency with no excess insurance protection afforded; and Reserves for the workers' compensation risk under this financial arrangement should include amounts set aside for incurred but not reported claims (estimated as 20 percent of the latest incurred loss year) and catastrophic occurrences (estimated on -the basis of 10 potential death claims for the County, --6 for Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and 3 for Riverview Fire Protection District) ; and 006,6111 t ; Based upon the above formulae, the current estimated maximum reserve amounts for only the incurred and not reported claims and catastrophic occurrence components of the workers` compensation risk shall not exceed $900,000 for Contra Costa County, $400,000 for the Contra .Costa County Fire Protection District, and 5200,000 for the -Riverview Fire Protection District; and This Board hereby declares- its intent to reserve these funds only for these purposes. PASSED BY THE BOARD ON June 27, 1,978 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C_ Fanden E. H. Hasseltine, R. ,I. Schroder. NOES: None. ABSENT: • Supervisor 1.7. N. Boggess. ABSTAIN: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and wired copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness myy hand and the Seal of than Board of :cc: County Administrator Supervisor County Counsel affixed this 27thday of June 29 78 Director of Personnel Auditor--Controller Contra Costa County Fire / f I R. OLSSON, Clark Protection Dist. By, fiat/r.` 4j&.&6--A _ , Deputy Clark Fire Protection Jamie L. Johnson District H-24 4/7715m ' �. �� is ... t aw.t.a.s �..;;4� r�.s4' '�.x�+t �"�i.,w['�""�,�."'s�•....�-rC-'C..�y.�•�ti. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19 78 In the Matter of Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Shig Doi, Operator of the County's Mobile X-ray Unit. On the recommendation of Supervisor J. P. Kenny, :IT-IS .' BY TAE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is authorized to execute a Certificate of Appreciation for Mr. Shig Doi,, who is. retiring after 26 years of service- as Operator of the. County's Mobile - : X-ray Unit. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. L 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Information OfficerSupervisors affixed this_2Z+,h_day of Tur A i 9 i�: ✓� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B -Z Deputy Clerk axine M. Ne el H-24 4/77 15m 00613- s IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 4. 0� COiTMA, COSTA COUITTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In The -?:atter of Agreements with ) Certain_ Colleges - Universities ) June 27 for I'Tork Study Students for the ) 1978 Office of the Public Defender. ) The Board having considered the recommendation of the County Administrator that the Chairman of the Board be authorized to execute agreements with the University of California-Boalt Hall, Berkeley, California, Hastings College of the Law., San Francisco, California, University of California, Davis California, McGeorge School of Law, San Francisco, California and Golden Gate University School of Law, San Francisco, California for employment of up to fifteen !a.ork Study Students by the Office of the, Public Defender for the period of July 1, 1978 through June 30 1979 (Total amounts of said agreements not to exceed $10,63.51 ; and _ Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having inquired if the Work Study Programs are cost effective since the County would be operating on reduced revenues due to the passage of Proposition 13; and Mr. C. A. Hammond, Chief Assistant County Administrator, having responded that said programs are cost effective, and having advised that a larger portion of the funds to support said programs come from the colleges; and Mr. B. M. Weiss, Chief Deputy Public Defender, having recuested the Board to approve said contracts since the Work Study Students provide assistance to- the Public Defender's Office, end having noted that no monies are encumbered until students are on the job and that the contracts can be terminated at any time; and Supervisor H. C. Fanden having expressed concern with respect to impending layoffs of permanent County as well as CETA employees and the loss of revenues, and having questioned the feasibility of entering into contract commitments at this time, and therefore having moved that the Board defer action' on this matter; and, The motion having died for lack of a second; and The Board having discussed the matter IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid contracts are APPROVED and that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978 by the follo:Ying vote: AYES: Supervisors J P. Penny, 11. N. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine and R. I. Schroder.- IMES:• Supervisor N. C. Fanden_. ABSENT : None. ABSTAIN: None. CERTIFIED COPY. I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of the original document which Is on fila in my office, and that it was passed & adopted by the Board of cc: U. C. Berkeley-Boalt Hall Supervisors of Contra Costa County. California, on Hastings College e of the Laid the date shown. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON. County Clerk&ez-officio Clerk of said Board of oupervisora U. C. Davis by Deputy Clerk. RcGeorge School of Lavr �� �r�1a.� ?1.c _on.Ju 27 1978 Golden Gate University County Administrator County Counsel Director of Personnel Auditor-Controller Public Defender OOG1 ' L� UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW Z , 198 MCALLisTER STREET 1' 1' SAN FRANCl3CO. CALIFORNIA 94102 AGR:'_f2I;E/College. 4ork-Study Program 71I1S =R.'=EMF-14T entered into this nate _July 1, 1978 by and.betweer, LlAST�I. COI.I,cC OFTHE LAW, anon-profit public institution, University of California, hereinafter "Hastings College", and Contra Costa County Public Defender a public or non-profit organization, hereinafter "Orgar:izatio:;", W'jRi;iAS Hastings College has applied for a grant by the U.S. Commissioner of Education pursuant to Part C. (Work-Study Program) of Title 1V of the Hig er ducation Act of 1965, as amended, to stimulate and promote the part-time employment of students, particularly students from low-income families keno are in need of earnings from such employment to pursue courses of study at in- stitutions of higher cducation such as Hastings College; and W1r1,1q-7AS Organization is in a position to utilize thR Eervices of such.students, and represents that the work performed by such students shall be in the public , interest and shall not a. Displace employed workers or impair existing contracts for services; or b. Involve political activity or work for any political party; or c. Involve the construction, operation or maintenance of so rmtch of any facility'as is used or is to be used for sectarian instruc- tion or as a place for religious worship; and further represents that the services and benefits of Organization which involve the work of such students shall be available to all persons regardless of race, color, sex, or national origin. The Parties heeto agree: r 1) No student shall be denied participation in the Work-Study Program because of race, color, sex, or national orgin. Page 1 of 3 4061 N►luc:. •� 1�� wish board order y. 2) This Agreement shall be subject to the availability of funds to Hastings College of the Law for the portion of the students' com- pensation not to be paid by Organization. It shall also be subject to the provisions of Part C (Work-Study Program) of Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as now amended, or from time to time amended and shall be subject to regulations implementing said legis- lation. 3) The Organization, and any agents and employees of Organization, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of Hastings College. Stu- dents furnished employment by Organization pursuant to this Agreement shall not be considered to be apprentices, employees, -agents, or offi" cers of Hastings College.. 4) This Agreement may be cancelled immediately by either party if there is a failure to comply withthe provisions of this agreement. 5) This Agreement shall terminate June 30, 1979, unless sooner terminated, and shall be subject to extension by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in writing. Organization agrees to: 1) Utilize the services of students furnished by Hastings College who are eligible to participate in the Work-Study Program and who are qualified and acceptable to Organization. 2) Reasonably supervise the services of such students and permit reasonable supervision by a representative of Hastings College. 3) Make a monthly report to Hastings College on Work-Study voucher forms supplied by Hastings College, as follows: a) the time worked by ' students participating in the program, indicating the total hours worked by students each day, week, and month; and b) certified by the Supervisor that the hours are accurately reported and that the student's work was satisfactory. 4) Allow no student to work for more than an average of twenty (20) hours a week as any time when classes are in session, and for not more than forty (40) hours a week when no classes are in session (summer school excepted unless the student is registered in summer school). 5) Not permit students to earn more than the amount of their Work-Study award as reported to the Organization by Hastings College on the students' current Work-Study Referral. Organization shall be responsible for pay- ment of 100%- of the salary of any student who works in excess of the maximum allowable hours or whose salary exceeds his/her Work-Study award. F. } :;dvsnce Hastings College, before a particular student is employed, thirty percent (30%) of the anticipated payroll for that student as invoiced on the student's Referral form. Checks payable to Hastings College of the Law should be sent to the Accounting Officer. Page 2 of 3 �Vli�,tl;s�mad with board order *� 7) Pay to Hastings College thirty percent (30%) of the total compensation paid to employed students participating in the program, of which swim one-third (1/3) is understood to be allocated for administrative cost to Hasting's College of the Law. The Work Study Program job description is hereby incorporated by reference. Hastings College agrees to: 1) Determine the need of the student in accordance with the instructions of the U.S. Office of Health, Education, and Welfare. 2) Determine the student's eligibility, academic and otherwise. 3) Pay the student's salaries on behalf of Organization. 4) Provide Organization a quarterly billing within one (1) month after the close of the calendar.quarter showing amounts paid on -behalf of Organi- zation and balance of Organization's 'advance" if any. 5) Refund to Organization any unused protion of advances made by Organi- zation as soon after June 30 as reasonably possible or on ternination of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties herto have executed this Agreement the date first above written- HASTINGS COLLEGE OF T~~- LA%4 ORGANIZATION 13a'ird of SuParhsors ? :a ti,:ez.:�a:aomi3 9 S11 53 By ADDRESS: Financial Aid Officer � ;a TELEPHONE: �7z Signature Organization Official:, R. 1.Schroder NOTE: If you are a private agency, please give article of incorporation or other documents which establishes your 'tax exempt status and des- cribes your activities- Contracts without adequate documentation of tax status will be returned for additional material- 0961 Page 3 of 3 �t� ttt� vititb board order HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW WORK-STUDY PROGRAM JOB DESCRIPTION I. Name of Organization: Contra Costa Public Defender Address: 510 Court Street, Martinez, Calif. 94553 Tele. 372-2481 Person to Contact: Bruce M. Weiss, Chief Deputy Activities of Organization: Primarily providing legal defense to indigent clients charged with criminal offenses in Contra Costa -County. II. Job Title: Law Clerk Job Description: Interviewing, research and writing memoranda of points and authorities Supervisor's Name: Bruce M. Weiss Title: Chief Deputy The Supervisor should be the same person who is signing the original Work-Study Agreement, and will subsequently sign all payroll time sheets. If this is not the case, please enclose a letter authorizing additional signatures signed by the person whose name appears on the original Work-Study Agreement.` III. Is the work to be performed in the public interest? YES x NO Will this work result in the displacement of employed workers or impair existing contracts? YES 210 x Is this work legal related? YES X no If YES, what areas of law are involved? Criminal law Are you a public agency? YES x NO If NO, have you been granted tax-exempt status by the IRS? YES NO-� (Note: Documents verifying non-profit status must be included with each contract renewal.) N. Will you be hiring for Summer? YES x NO and/or Fall and Spring semesters? YES X NO Please indicate if you have a particular student for the Position: No Additional Remarks: We will hire a maximum of four (4) students at a rate of $4.50 per hour_ Signature 00618 Mite y i`mvd with board order WORK-STUDY JOB MASTER CARD DATE: July 1, 1978 AGF21C Y OR DEPARTMENT: Contra Costa County Public Defender ADDRESS: 610 Court Street, Martinez, California 94553 TELEPHONE 372-?4RI PERSON Zn CONTACT: Bruce M. Weiss, Chief Deputy JOB TITLE: haw Clerk DESCRIPTION OF DUTIES: InterViewing clients, research and writing memoranda of points and authorities_ SPM- IAL REQUIREMENTS, IF ANY: Second and third year law students 20 part time HOURS PER WEEK: 40 summer vacatiodOURLY RATE: $4.50. APPLICATION DEADLINE: Open i• 0061ZY • Mic;etim'-nd with board order 13. College may terminate this Agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor shotild Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination, College may proceed tb carry out the purpose of thB Agreement in any manner deemed proper by College. The cost to the College shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Agreement,and the balance, if any,shall be paid the Contractor upon demand. o�� the o11e e 14. This Agreement is not assignable by Contractof/either to whole or in�art. == 15. Time is of the essence of each and all the provisions of this Agreement, and the provisions of this Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon and i_ , respective parties hereto. 16. it is mutually understood and agreed that no alteration.or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and that no oral understandings or agreements not incorporated herein,and no alterations or variations of theterms hereof unless made in writing between the parties hereto shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 17. This Agreement shall terminate June 30, 1979 unless sooner terminated,and shall be subject to extention only upon the same.terms,except as to term,by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in writing. 18. Total compensation to be paid to students participating in this program through this agreement shall not exceed S g S n n unless otherwise agreed upon by both parties. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. The following exhibits are hereincorporated herein by reference. by Exhibit A "Work Study Program" e.low) Count of Contra. Costa Contractor y ._._ Exhibit B "Fiscal Year 1978-79 University Work Study Address 610 Courree Contract" (attached) t',Stt -- Exhibit C "Ad tional Provisions" (attacher}} artinez CA 94553 Exhibit (415) 372-2481 ---�--"' 1.Schroder. Signature - Fi nanclal Ai Director ---.-S tgnitum—Destro,or Derp+y-iettd Represingtive—�— �� WORK-STUDY PROGRAM EXHIBIT "A" Contractor with which student employment arrangement is being proposed: Contra Costa County Public Defender 1. 610 Court Street r Name of G`ontractor ------------------------372-2481----� -------------------------------------------- - -- -----_ __ .................... -- Add .... ress7elepFione T7uin6eir-••"""".......------------------------ --------Martinez.,_ Cai liforna __ •____ 94553 City State Zip Code 2. Person directing Contractor: -_ Bruce M. Weiss Chief__Deput�_________ ......___-............ Flame Title 3. Address where work is to be performed if different from Contractor's principal office: 423 Cumberland,Pittsburg_- 1957-8_-Parkside,_..Concord__- 3811-Bissell.,--Ric nd 4. Is the work to be provided related to a community action program? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes❑ No 0 If yes,indicate agency and Director of Program 5. Statement on special conditions for employment in work for public or private non-p'oftt organization: 1.31 Is work to be performed"in the public interest"? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes 0 No ❑ 1.32 is this work"that would not otherwise be provided"? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes M No❑ 1.33 Will this work result in the displacement of employed workers or impair existing contracts for service?. Yes❑ No gg 6. Activities of Contractor(Student Job Title/Description): Law Clerk for the Public Defender of Contra Costa County. Prefer second and thirdear law students. Duties will .be research of legal issues,_ brief_—writing and assistance in interviewing._—A11� of this is primarily_-within the_-cim �ga ,-defense_-f r, ................ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------M 2 ---------- ------------------------------------------------ ------------ -' --------� _..-...--------------l�i�-•T--.:,1�:�.:�►nth--lwrrrd-ot+8or . GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF FINANCIAL AID � iyrsA:�Cy4 WORK-STUDY PROGRAM - OFF-CAMPUS PROJECT AGREEMENT This agreement entered into this. Z 5 t.._..._.—day of. JULY , 19?$-.by and between G.1den Gate University at San Francisco,California,hereinafter called the College,anti.r._..COUNTY_OF _ CONTRA COSTA , a non-profit organization/agency hereinafter called the Contractor. W I T N E S S F T H : College has received a grant from the U.S.Commissioner of Education pursuant to Title IV,Part C,of the Higher Educa- tion Act of 1965 (Work-Study Programs: 73 St. 513, 514, 516 [1964),as amended 79 St. 974, 1249, 1250, 1251 [1965],as amended 81 St.726 [19671;42 U.S.C.SS 2751-2757 [19681).The purpose of that grant is to stimulate and promote the part-time employment of students, particularly students from low-income families,in institutions of higher education who are in need of the earnings from such employment to pursua courses of study at such institutions. College and Contractor desire that certain of College's students engage in work for public and private nonprofit organ=- tions such as Contractor under the Work-Study Program authorized by the Act. Contractor is in a position to utilize the servicrs of such students. College, in consideration for Contractor employing College's students as further provided for herein,as bargained for by College;and Contractor,in consideration for College agreeing that Contractor shall receive the services and benefits accruing from this Agreement,as bargained for by Contractor,both agree as follows: ! 1. Contractor shall utilize the service of students furnished by College who are eligible to participate in the Work-Study Program and who are qualified and acceptable to Contractor. The specific services to be performed by said srud.-nts are ser forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein. 2. The work performed by said students shall be in the public interest and shall be consistent wiih the purposes of Title 1 IV, Part C,of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 3. The work performed by said students shall not: a.-Otherwise be provided; b. Displace employed workers or impair contracts for services; ' c. Involve political.activity or work for any political party;or d. Involve the construction,operation,or maintenance of that part of any facility used,or planned'to be used,for sectarian instruction or as a place for religious worship. 4. Contractor shall: a. Reasonably supervise he services of students participating in the Work-Study Program and permit reasonable supervision by a representative of the College-, b. Make a report, not less often than monthly to the College of the time worked by students participating in the program; c. Allow no student to work for more than an average of fifteen hours per week per term in which he is enrolled in classes,and for not more than forty hours in any other week;and d. Concurrent with its entering into this Agreement, deposit with College money in an amount sufficient to cover at leas 31L, percent of the total compensation to be paid to students participating in the program. 5. Compensation to be paid to students participating in the program will be reasonable in light of the work to be per= formed by them. 6. The services and benefits of Contractor which involve the work of such students shall be available to all persons regard- less of race, color,religion,sex, or national origin. No student shall be denied participation in the Work-Study Program because of race,color, religion,sex,or national origin. ; 7. College agrees to return to Contractor amounts deposited by Contractor which are not used for the payment of salaries or other payroll expenses of students employed by Contractor. _ 8. College will be responsible for: ti a. Determination of the need of the student in accordance with the instructions of the U S.Off of Health,Education and Welfare; �'�j i t b. Determination of students' eligibility,academic and otherwise; L Irr1 c- Payment of students' salaries on behalf of Contractor. 9. This Agreement shall be subject to the availability of funds to College for the portion of the student's compensation not to be paid College by Contractor. It shall also be subject to the provisions of the Higher Education Act of 1965,as amended, the regulations adopted thereunder, • " r,as amended,and all legislation and regulations pertaining to the Wor cotuc(ye ogram adopted subsequent to January 1, 1965. 10. The irrstst+.�gan shall have the right to control and direct this Program in accordance with institutional and Federal regulations. it shall establish appropriate policies :with respect to such matters as the total. number of students to be erployed, the hourly rate of pay and the total number of hours per week each student w;1 1 work. 11. The Contractor shall be responsible for all employee benefits and provide workman s compensation insurance at Contractors own cost and expense for all persons,including but not limited to students;06"fo miduvil"ter , 12. The Contractor, and any agents and employees of Contractor,in the performance of this Agreement,shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of the Cortege.Students furnished employment by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement shall not be considered to be apprentices,employees,agents,or officers of the College. Public Defender's Office Contra Costa County w�sG%,r E i`� EXHIBIT "B" o $ 13 U 's .� o• UNIVERSITY WORK-STUDY CONTRACT ?�FRANG�SG Contract Period: July 1, 1978 through June 30, 1979 Number of Students Covered by Contract: Three Salary: $3.50 an hours Total Contract Amount: $9,500. 00 30% Agency Share: $2,850 This is the total amount- that your agency is responsible' for during the contract period cited above. Monthly invoices are, however, based on the ACTUAL gross pay reported for 'the student (s) during the month. It is the agency's responsibility to keep copies of the student(s) time cards, for reference and for a check against the invoices as they are received. During the academic year students" Work-Study awards are based on . 15 hours per week; however, to provide flexibility to the, students . and the agencies, students can work up to 19 hours each week. As a result, some students may reach their maximum award limit before the end of the contract period. If so, these students will be taker off Work-Study as soon as their award limit is reached. Therefore, it is the agency's and the student's responsibility to monitor the .number of hours he/she has worked. When a student is hired by your agency, it is necessary that you fill out and sign a STUDENT HIRING NOTICE and forward it to the Financial Aid Office for processing. Without this card on file, the student (s) will be unable to receive their paycheck even if a time card is submitted. Please sign and return the original and one copy of the enclosed Work-Study Program -- Off-Campus Project Agreement. Retain one copy for your files. 00622 &MCp0fj161ed with board order GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY 536 Mission Street San Francisco -California 94105 -Telephone (415) 391-7800 Public Defender's Office Contra Costa County EXHIBIT C ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS TERMINATION BY CONTRACTOR. Should Contractor find a student's performance under this contract unsatisfactory, Contractor may terminate this contract and be relieved of further obligation hereunder, upon one (1) week's notice to College. PRIMACY OF EXHIBITS Should any inconsistency of terms exist, the provisions of Exhibits "A" , "B" and "C" supersede the standard provisions of the contract and the provisions of Exhibit "C" supersede those of Exhibit "B". ffivcfitmed Stith board order 00623 a':x' UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY COLLEGE WORK-STUDY PROGRAM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this lst. day of July 1973 . by and between THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, hereinafter called "University," and Contra Costa County Pithlir n Fonder a non-profit organization hereinafter called "Organization;" W I T NE S S E T H WHEREAS, University has applied for a grant by the U.S. Commissioner of Education pursuant to Title I, Part C, of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Public Law 88-452, as amended, and has been amended by the Higher-Education Act of 1965, Public Lav 89-329 and Public Law 90-82 approved September 6, 1967., and has been amended by the Educational Amendments of. 1972, Public Law 92-318 and the Educational Amendments of 1976, Public Law 94-482, to stimulate and promote the part-time employment of students, particularly those with great financial need, who are in need of earnings from such employment in order to pursue courses of study at institutions of Nigher education such as University; . and WHEREAS, University and Organization desire that certain of the Univer- sity's students engage in work for public and private nonprofit organizations under the Work-Study Program authorized by the Act; and WHER. EAS, Organization is in a position to utilize the services of such students; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The University shall be deemed the employer for purposes of this agreement. It has the ultimate right to control and direct the services of the student for the Organization. It shall also determine that the students meet the eligibility requirements for employment under the College Work-Study Program, assign students to work for the Organization, and determine that the students do perform their work in fact. The Organization's right shall be limited to direction of the details and means by which the result is to be accomplished. 2. Organization shall meet any and all other conditions as set forth in the College Work-Study guidelines as set forth in the Federal Register dated September 1, 1976. 3. The work performed by such students shall be in the public interest and shall not a. Displace employed workers, impair existing contracts for services; nor fill pasitions that are vacant because the employer's regular employees are on strike. b. Involve any partisan or nonpartisan political activity associated with a candidate or with a contendfng faction or group in an election for public or party office MicY?'ilmed with board order e . C. Involve any lobbying on the Federal level y; d. Involve the construction, operation, or maintenance of so much of any facility as is used or is to be used for sectarian instruction or as a place for religious worship. 4. Organization agrees to a. Reasonably supervise the services of students participating in the :fork-Study Program and permit reasonable supervision by a representative of University; b. Make a report to University of time worked by students participating in the program indicating the total hours worked each week and containing the Supervisor's certi- fication as to the accuracy of the hours reported and of satisfactory performance on the part of the students, at least monthly; c. Allow no student to work for more than an average of twenty (20) hours per week over a quarter, or other term used by the University in awarding credits to the student, during which the student is enrolled in classes (excluding any period during which the student is on vacation) , and for not more than forty (40) hours in any week; and d. Pay University ____per cent (20 ) of the total compensation to be paia to students participating in the. program. The Organization will pay to the University in advance any amount calculated to cover the Organization's share of the students' compensation or within thrity (30) _- days upon receipt of a written Statement of Account to Organization at the end of each quarter showing; expenditures, receipts, and balance due. 5. Compensation to be paid to students participating in the program will be appropriate and reasonable in light of the work to be performed by them. Rate of compensation shall be subject to approval by University. The Work Study job request is hereby incorporated by reference. 6. In accordance with Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Sections 503 and. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and Section 402 of the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974, the services and benefits of Organization which involve the work of sucli students shall be available to all persons regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap, age, or veterans of the Vietnam era. No students shall be denied participation in the Work-Study Program because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap, age, or because they are disabled veterans or veterans of the Vietnam era. 7. Compensation of students for work performed on a project under this agreement will be disbursed--and all payments due as an employer's contribution under State or local workmen's compensation laws, under Federal or State social security laws, or under other applicable laws, will be made-- by the University. 8. The agreement shall be subject to the availability of, funds to University for the portion of the student's compensation not' to be paid by Organization. It shall also be subject to the provisions of Part C (Workoflifflin.5 UW &r-,CrdfljMed with GoarF ,,...+.,r Programs) of Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as now amended, or from time to time amended, and shall be subject to regulations implementing', said legislation. 9. This agreement may be cancelled by either party, if there is a failure to comply with the provisions of the agreement. 10. This agreement shall terminate on the int-,h day of June , 19_, unless sooner terminated- and_be subject to extension by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto in writing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written: Contra Cost lie Defender THE GE TS OF.THE-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA I I (Organiza t By: R. !.Schroder By: Chairman;'Board of Supervisor Director of Financial Aid �:. (Title) (Title) 0062 EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT COLLEGE WORK-STUDY PROGRAM University of California, Davis Y and Off-Campus Employer f i Reference is made to the Agreement between CONTRA COSTA PUBLIC OEFENDERIS MARTINEZ (agency) (city) and the Regents of the University of California, relative to the College Work-Study Program agreement dated _711 /7:ZZ We wish to extend this agreement for one additional year, which would establish a termination date of 6/30/79 I understand .that the employer's share of student. wages for the 1978-79., fiscal year is 20;, with the remaining 800% paid with College Work-Study funds. The off-campus job request is hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title IX•of�the Education Amendments of 1972, I certify that I will not discriminate- in-the hiring and employment of students on the basis•of race, color, national origin or sex. 0A Jonellen C. Godcigr i Research Coordina '• ' R.f.Schroder, ti Allen G. Marr Nap@ Contm Cassa County Dean, Graduate Studies and Research Board of Supervisors ; y Address � kadli I%;#.,I IN Attrr"G.Russell, Chief Cldrk. JUN 2'7.1978; Date Please sign all three copies of this form. Retain one copy for your files and return the original and one copy alorig •with the Signature Authorization form to: Work-Study Coordinator Financial aid Office. University of California Davis, CA 95616 0062 1 Microfilmed with board order , P 27 x/73 WORK STUDY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT entered into between University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law hereinafter known as the "Institution" , and Contra Costa County Public Defender , hereinafter known as the "Organization" , a (public organization) , G �v, h�Ex� ; rf /tllo5dg'a �a�a��o (strike one) for the purpose of providing work to students eligible to participate in the _ _ College Work-Study Program. 1. Schedules to be attached to this Agreement from time to time, bearing the signature of an authorized official of the Institution and of the Organization, will set forth brief descrip- tions of the work to be performed by students under this Agreement, the total number of students to be employed, the hourly rates of pay, and the average number of hours per week each student will be utilized. These schedules will also state the total length of time the project is expected to run, the total percent of student com- pensation that the Organization will pay to the Institution, and the total percent, if any, of the cost• of .employers' payroll con- tribution to be borne by the Organization. The Institution will inform the Organization of the maximum number of hours per week a student may work. Sc$edules A and B are hereby incorporated by reference. Future modification of said schedules is to be b mutual a r ement 2. Students will be made available to ythe Organi.�ia Ton n i the Institution for performance of specific work assignments. Stu- dents may be removed from work on a particular assignment or from the Organization by the Institution, either on its own initiative or at the request of the Organization. The Organization is aware that should a student be academically disqualified from school he or she would be ineligible for further work-study benefits and thus subject to dismissal. The Organization agrees that no student will be denied work or subjected to different treatment under this Agreement on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, and that it will comply with the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352; 78 Stat. 252) and Title IX of the Educa- tional Amendments of 1972 (P.L. 92-318) and the Regulations of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare which implement those Acts. ` 3. Transportation for students to and from their work. assignments will not be provided by either the Institution or the. Organization. 00628 Miv+ofilmed with board order Page 2. 4. The Organization shall be deemed the employer for purposes of this Agreement_ It has the right to control and direct the services of the student, not only as to the result to be accomplished, but also as to the means by which the result is to be accomplished. The Institution shall be limited to de- termining that the students meet the eligibility requirements for employment under the College Work-Study Program, to assigning students to work for the Organization, and to determining that the students do perform their work in fact. 5. Compensation of students for work performed' on a project under this Agreement will be disbursed - and all payments due as an employer's contribution under State or local workmen's compensation laws, under Federal or State social security laws, or under other applicable laws, will be made - by the Institution. 6. At such times as are agreed upon in writing, the Organization will pay to the Institution an amount calculated to cover the Organization's share of the compensation of students ' employed under this Agreement. 7. In addition to the payment specified in Paragraph (6) above, at such times as are agreed upon in writing, the-Organization will pay, by way of reimbursement to the Institution, or in advance, an amount .equal to =_=v and all payments - required to be made by the Institution under State or local workmen's compensation laws, or under Federal or State social security laws, or under any other- applicable laws , on account of students participating in -projects under this Agreement_ 8. The parties agreed that the work performed by students , shall be in the public interest and shall not: a. Displace employed workers or impair existing contracts or services; b. Involve political activity or work for any political party; or c. Involve the construction, operation or maintenance of so much of any facility as is used or is to be used for sectarian instruction oras a place for religious worship. 9. The Organization will furnish to the Institution for each payroll period time reports indicating the total hours worked each week and containing the supervisor's certification as to the accuracy of the hours reported and of satisfactory performance on the part or the students. 00029 Micaofilmed with board order Page .3. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties executed this Agree- ment this 12th day of April 19 78 ORGANIZAT A. 1.Scnroder' . By �. (_ ItTAuthorized Representative- INSTITUTION ----------- By �By I ' Its Authorized Repres t tive, Arthur Terzakis Director of Placement .30 , Miwfilmed..with board 'order. DATE:—April 1.2, 1978 SCHEDULE A Institution shall pay from its federal funds sixty 609o, .1 percent of the agreed salary rate and it is understood'and agreed that Organization will bear forty - ( 4.0%) percent of the total compensation to be paid to said students, ftoge-Mer with any hourly amount in excess of the agreed student salary. Organization will make payment of its forty percent 40% ) share of the student salaries, plus any additional compensation on the following—7ites: August 1978 , September 1978 , October 1978 , November 1978 , December 1978, January 1979, February 1979 , March 1979, April 1979, May 1979, June 1979, July 1979. Number of students to be employed under this agreement: STUDENT NAMES Total hours each Average Number of Haximum number of Hourly rate of pay student is author- student hours per hours student may ized to work for the week:* work per week:* period of agreement. . 400 40 40 $3. 50 Period of Contract: 7/1/78 TO 6/30/79 *The Organization will allow no student to work for ORGANI more than an average of twenty hours per week over By RJ Schroder a quarter, or other term used by the Institution in awarding units to the student, during which the Xts-Authorized Representative student is enrolled in classes (excluding any period during which the student is on vacation) , and for % not more than forty (40) hours in any week during which a student is on vacation. INSTITUTION: By to Its Authorizeepresents Arthur Terzakis 09631 -Director of Place t Microfilmed with board order DATE May 12, 1978 SCHEDULE B AGENCY NAME: Contra Costa County Public Defender NUMBER OF JOBS JOB TITLE RATE/HOUR* BRIEF DESCRIPTION 2 Work Study 3.50 Interviewing clients, research Law Clerk ORGANI By Fl. i..Schroder Its Aut orized Representative INSTITUTION: By lv * Organization shall pay full Its Aut orized Represe tive, amount of any salary in excess Arthur Terzakis of amount shown on Schedule A. Director of Placement Microfilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 �8 In the Matter of Executive Session_. At 11:37 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, - California to discuss salary matters with labor negotiators (pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) ; At 11:58 a.m. the-Board reconvened in its Chambers and adopted the following:Lurgency Resolution No. 78/635 and Urgency Ordinance No. 78-47) � I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of%i�TT entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this27th day of LTTmA 197 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Cleric Maxine M. Neuie_� H-24 4/77 15m 00633 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on ) the Recommendation of the ) Contra Costa County Planning ) Commission on Proposed General ) June 27, 1978 Plan Amendment for the South ) Ygnacio Valley Area ) The Board on May 23, 1978 having fixed this time for hearing on the recommendation of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission with respect to the proposed amendment to the County General Plan for the South Ygnacio Valley area; and Mr. H. Fenichel, Assistant Director of Planning,. having briefly described the goals and objectives of the proposed General Plan revision, and having advised the Board that a Negative Declaration of environmental significance had been filed on the property pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; and The hearing having been opened and Ms. Gail A. Landis, :. representing the Upper Ygnacio Valley Homeowners ' Association, having expressed interest in monitoring all planning and zoning for the areas included in North Gate, Pine Creek, and Castle Rock Roads; and Mr. Wayne Policz, representing Mr. William Ames, Jr. , having requested that certain lands which are to be retained by Mr. Ames be removed from the open space category and assigned to the single residential, very low density category, and that the property designated to be purchased by County Service Area R-8 be removed from the open space classification and designated for parks and recreation; and Mr. L. Foley, Zoning Administrator for the City of Walnut Creek, having advised that the City Council had approved the proposed amendment and that even though he was not aware of Mr. Ames ' request prior to the hearing, he could see no reason to oppose it; and Board members having discussed the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing on the proposed General Plan Amendment is closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed General Plan Amendment for the South Ygnacio Valley area is REFERRED back to the Planning Commission to consider modifying said plan on the Ames ' property to show parks and recreation on the land to be purchased . by the County Service Area R-8 and single family residential, very low density on the remainder of said property; the plan text should be reviewed to consider mandating the use of planned unit development zoning for any projects on the land designated for residential use and that the Director of Planning shall transmit the recommendation of the Planning Commission prior to July 11, 1978 . 00634 June 27, 1978 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that July 11, 1978 at 9:30 a.m, is fixed as the time for decision thereon. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 20th day of June; 1978 - J. 978 -J. R. OLSSON,' Clerk Diana M. Herman, Deputy Clerk CC: Director of Planning 0Qe3j k- , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 ' 1978 In the Matter of School Crossing Guard Service The Public Works Director having provided 'a report on the location of the school crossings where guards are . furnished and the school district in which they are located, and having recommended that the Board either authorize crossing guard services at all locations or alternately discontinue all crossing guard services; and Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having commented that he considered the program a very valuable service, but. recognized that there is a question as to who should pay for it, and having recommended that the matter be referred to the Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N.'- C. Fanden) to be considered in connection with the 1978-79 budget,. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Hasseltine is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of dh order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Committee Members Supervisors County Administrator Public Works Director affixed this 27th day of June - i9 78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B . Deputy Cleric M. Vannucchi 0063� H-24 4177 15m CONTRA -COSTA CC;;_v^Y PUBLICWORKS DE??_T_r'ti" Martinez, California TO: Board of Supervisors FROM Vernon L_ Cline Public Works Director SUBJECT: Public Works Agenda for June 27; 1978 REPORTS Report A- SCHOOL CROSS:MG GUARD SERV LCE_ ' At the i.n.st_T-uctaan or your Board, the Public Works" Director- has sent a letter to school districts affected by schccl crossing guard service. The locations of the schools :shere crossing-guards are now furnished and the school district in which" they � 1� are located are shown in the table below. Narae of School Location . School District 1_ Mountain View School Palm -Ave_ at Martinez 1�!artih_z LT,-j"ified Avenue, I~ia,*-tinez School District 2_" Las Juntas-galla Pacheco Blvd. at Elementary School rCamino Del Sol, School District Mar-ti rez 3_ G-!=Ln a= School State Highway g at Oaklev Union Douglas Rd. , Oakley School District .4. Rensir_gton School. Arlington Blvd. at Rich,-oncd Unifiec Ri.ncor_ Rd_, Kensington School District 5_. Olinda School San Pablo Dan Rd. at Ric!=.ond Uir_i.fie<tl Castro Rancli Road, School District El Sobrante 6 Vista Grande School Diablo Rd_ at -kr. royo San-Ramon Valley Drive, Danville 'Unified School Di3trict 7. Vista Grande School Card-no Tassa;ara at San Ramon Valley Vista Grande St- , Unified SchooL Danville District 8. Pacheco School Center Ave. at Deodar Mt. Diablo Unified Drive, Pacheco School District 9. St. Isidore School. Danville Blvd_ at St. Isidore's La Gonda Wav, _ •- Catholic School Danville (Continued on next oace) A'G E N D A Public Works DepartMent -'-pzgz ? of 11 Jure 27, 1978 } Microfilmed with board order 000 f v Raiport♦ A Continued: This Departmen_ has been informed that the Martinez Unified School District will close the mountain View School. Telephone inquiry of the other school districts reveals that no f?ria recoomsndati.or-s for alternate service will be forthcoming. The Couaty Administrator recommended is his letter to your Board, dated June 20, 1978r that crossing guard services should be reduced from $48,100 to $23,088. The crossing guards were authorized 'after an extensive enginee ng study based on criteria adopted.by-the Board. These criteria evalluate the' existence and frequency of- adequate gaps in a stream of traffic CO enable students .to cross the street in safety. All:locaons: wheys crossing guard se=-vices are now provided meeL the � UMI criteri__ Foe this reason, it is the opinion of the Public Works 15irecEdr that priorities for .school crossing guard services anong' thz authorz_ed locations cannot readily be determined 'and .relative need caano t be n n established between locations.. It is therefore recommeadec that the Board %i er authorize crossing guard services at all 0_ the eight re-a g locan-tions or alts ztely discontinue all crossing guars .� } N SUPERVISORIAL DIS'T'RICT 1 . - .r 00638 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19 78 In the Maiftr of Funding Recreational Service .Areas The Public Works Director having presented certain , recommendations for funding for minimum maintenance of park . and recreation facilities for County Service Areas .M-17, R-6;.- R-7 and R-8 for the fiscal year 1978-79; IT IS BY THE BOARD 'ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations are referred to the Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden) . PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of 5n order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Committee Members Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 27th day of June 1918 Director of Public Works Service Area Coordinator . ` J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk M. .Vannucchi H-24 4/77 15m .00639 ;.;fix, r.: bunuc WMus DErAanMr CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date: June 16, 1978 V ► To: Board of Supervisors From: Vernon L. Cline, Public Works DirectoI.Wm4t Subject: Recreational Service Areas. . At the meeting of June 15, the Board of. Supervisors ' considered the matter of funding various park and recreational service areas (i.e. , M-17, R-5, R-6, R-7 and R-8) for the purpose of minimum maintenance of building and park facilities. The Board requested that cost estimates be developed for further consider- ation. Following are the estimates -requested. Service Area Location Estimate 78/79 M-17 Montalvin Park $10,600 R-6 Orinda -16,500 R-7 San Ramon 23,500 R-8 Walnut Creek 13,500 -Total Estimate $64,100 County Service Area R-5 (Danville Area) was not included in the above as there will be sufficient carry-over funds from the 1977/78 budget to maintain this small park for the 1978/79 fiscal year. If the Board decides to budget funds for park and recreation facilities it is recommended that the Board allocate the above amounts to the service areas as indicated for minimum maintenance.. purposes. VLC/JF:jb- cc: County Administrator Clerk of- the Board RECEIVED O JUN a 71978 UERX SOARD Oi: SUPERVISORS • B CQN��A OSTA CO..Oe u , { In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19 -M a In the Matter of Authorization for One Additional Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreement (OPT-OUT) The Board having authorized the execution of standard-form. Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreements with a combined total of 70 residential care facility operators, effective on or after September 1, 1977 under the - transfer of the State-operated Community Care Services Section (OPT-OUT) to .Contra Costa County, and The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, and County Mental Health Director regarding the need for one (1) additional Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreement, IT- IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee, is. AUTHORIZED to execute, on behalf of the County, a standard form Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreement with the residential care facility operator named below: Number Facility Operator Term of Agreement 71 Garth & Milrita C. Blanchard May 24, 1978- dba Ren-B-Way June 30, 1979 130 Anderson Way, Martinez PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of oA order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Sean of the Board of Supervisors Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit affixed this 27thday of JLne 19 78 cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller County Mental Health / J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director By p `�/ ; Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson 00641 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 l9 In the Matter of Reappointments to the Contra Costa County Employees` :Retirement Board Supervisor R. I. _Schroder: havi.n& recommended==that Mr. Gary A. Worsham, Ms:'.Marcella B. Colarich, and Mr. Richard K. Sponenbergh be reappointed to the Contra Closta County Employeest Retirement Board for three-year terms ending June 30, 1981; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Schroder is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. r I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Appointees Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Retirement Association Supervisors 27th June 78 County Auditor-Controller affixed this day of 19 County Administrator Public Information Officer ^ ^ R. QLSSON, Clerk County Treasurer-Tax Collector ' l C By Deputy Clerk nda Amdahl `}? H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California T 1nP ?7 . 19 7$_... In the Matter of Resignation from the Developmental Disabilities Area Board V. Supervisor R. I. Schroder having noted that he had received a June 20, 1978 letter from Mr. Walter J. Jackson, - Chairperson, Developmental Disabilities Area Board V, advising that Mrs. Frances L. Smith is resigning from said Board effective June 30, 1978 and requesting that the Board of Supervisors appoint a replacement to fill the unexpired term of Mrs. Smith and a new three-year term ending December 31, 1981; and Supervisor Schroder having recommended that the resignation of Mrs. Smith from the Developmental Disabilities Area Board V be accepted and the Board of Supervisors' appointment policy be applied in accordance with Mr. Jackson' s request; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Schroder is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of c1h order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: Mr. Jackson Supervisors Developmental Disabilities affixed this 27th day of June 1978 Council of Contra Costa County _ Director, Human Resources J. R. SSON, Clerk Agency ' County Administrator BY Deputy Clerk Public Information Officer ondea Amdahl Q0s43 H-24 4177 15m IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COMMA COSTA CCU1V'TY, STATE OF CALIFORMIA In the Patter of Award of Contract ) for the Blackhawk Road Overlay ) June 27, 1978 Project, Danville Area. ) Project No. 4331-4405-661-77 ) Bidder TIMAL M-MTNT Bond Amounts Oliver de Silva, Inc. $32,050.00 Labor Materials $16,025.00 22991 Clawiter Road Faithful Perf. 32,050.00. " P.O. 4437 Hayward, CA 94545 0. C. Jones and Sons, Berkeley The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and Tie Public Works Director recamvmding that the bid listed first above is the lo -est .responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS BY THE BQARD ORDERED, that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices surai.tted in said bid; and that said contractor shall present two good! and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Departn nt shall '. prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FUF=-R ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance or other required documents, and the Public Works Director has reviewed and found them to be sufficient, the Public `works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FU=ER ORDERED that, in accordance with the project specifications and/or upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, any bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be exonerated and any checks or cash submitted for bid security shall be returned. PASSED by the Boazd on June 27, 1978 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand arra the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27thday of June , 1978 . .riginator: Public Vbrks Department . J. R. Gi.SSCzi, Clerk -c: Public jvorks Director County Auditor-Controller V U 64 Contractor "B� , Deputy-Clerk 'Rev. 9-77) i Sandra L. Nielson .• . tt In the Board of Supervisors of Conga Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19 78 In the Matter of Approval of the County Health Department's FY 78-79 "Immunization Initiative Plan" County #29-208-6 for submission to the State Department of Health The Board having considered the recommendation to the• Director,. Human Resources Agency, regarding approval of the County Health Department's, FY 78-79 Immunization Initiative Plan (County #29-208-6) for submission to . the State Department of Health, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said Immunization Initiative Plan #29-208-6 is hereby APPROVED for submission to the State Department of Health, representing a request for $37,060'in State funding for continuation of the County Health Department's Child Immunization Project from July 3, 1978 through June 30, 1979, as more particularly set forth in said Immunization Initiative Plan. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. r e. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of ad order entered on the z minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Wiriness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ' Dreg: Human Resources Agency Supervisor Attn: Contracts and Groats Unit affixed this 27thd of June 19 78 cc: County Administrator --- ay County Auditor-Controller County Health Officer J. R. OISSON, Clerk State Dept. of Health BK o�C.fd� a .-DeP�+h� Clerk Jamie L. Johnson i SD:dg 00645 ((i H-24 4/77 ism NUI�$ER __2.9_- 208 -6 11 *WIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1. Puroese and Goals The purpose of the Immunization Program is to prevent the occurrence and transmission of childhood diseases preventable through immunizations. The Program will be accomplished through an integrated and comprehensive immuni— zation delivery system capable of making immunizations available to every child needing them. Program activities will be coordinated with local school officials. An intensive Immunization Initiative will be carried out with two specific goals: (1) by October 1, 1979, to raise iammmization levels above 90 percent for all children under age 15 who today are inadequately protected against measles, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, rubella (prepuberty), and aumns (preschoolers); (2) to establish a permanent mechanism to provide comprehensive imatunization services to nearly 100 percent of the children born in Contra Costa County each year. 0004 .Mcmfilmed with board order I.LWNL IZATION INITIATIVE PLAN rage L 2. &acl.ground and ?seeds - Contra Costa County - (a) A five-member Board of Supervisors is the governing body in Contra Costa County. The Supervisors are elected to four-year terms from the supervisorial districts in which they reside. The County Administrator is appointed by the Board of Supervisors, serves as the chief executive for the county, and assists the Board in the overall operation of the county. The Human Services Advisory Corimission recently appointed by the Board of Supervisors is currently studying services to children. (b) The administrative offices of the Health Department are located in - Martinez (Central County) which includes Public Health Medical Services-e.g. Communicable Disease Control and Maternal and Child Health, Child Health and Disability Prevention and Immunization Assistance Programs, Community Health Services e.g. School Healthand Health Education, Home Health Services- e.g. PHN and Clinic Services. Area offices which include PHN and clinic services are located in the three major divisions of the county-West County (Richmond), Central County (Concord) and East County (Pittsburg). (c) Population Estimates - January,1978 611,700 Corporated and Unincorporated a. - 1 ' 5502 b. 1-4 32318 c. 5-9 48841 1975 Estimate 1977 - Public: and Private Elementary d. 10-14 59822 Intermediate, and High School e. 15-19 55983 enrollment approximately f. 20+ 378,254 147,000. (d) Though once primarily agricultural, Contra Costa County in recent years has experienced tremendous growth in commerce and industry. There have been large residential developments in West and Central County. East County industry remains agricultural in nature. The three areas are divided by two sets of foothill ranges. Northern and Western portions have oil refineries as a major part of industry. West County-*population total of 127,803 with 38% of the population being other than white/caucasian (Predominately Black) Central County -*population total 219,688 with 6% of the population being other than white/caucasian. East County -# population total 61,203 with 25% being predominantly Latin American in origin. * does not include unincorporated areas. .(e) Morbidity-Mortality Data 1977 Morbidity 1st 4 Months 1978 Rubella 33 90 Measles 288 12 Mumps 7 5 0064"1 Pertussis 0 f Diphtheria No case reported in the last 5 years Tetanus No case reported since 1968 Polio No case reported since statistical tabulation began in 1967. Mortality - 0 (r') -un zatf6K c� Private physicians in Contra Costa County provide 85-90: of the Immunizations. The Health Department provides services through two major vehicles, Child Health Screening and Immunization Clinics. 43 Child Health Screening Clinics are held monthly (1S day each) throughout the county in co.:municy centers or local Health Department offices. Immunization- Clinics are held at 10 different locations, at churches, community health centers, and Health Department offices: 64 clinics, 2-3 hours in length are held monthly in the afternoon with two extending into *the evening. Additional clinics on a special basis such as school-based, community-based and Health Department-based Immunization Clinics are held if requested, one example being the special Measles Clinics established Spring 1977. Immunizations available are DPT, DT, Polio, Rubeula, Rubella, Rubeola-Rubella, Measles-Humps-Rubella, Smallpox, and Typhoid. . Immzunizations are given free of charge. Outreach is done by ACD and ZAP-CHDP personnel in coordination with the Health Educators, Health Department school health personnel, school personnel and Public Health Nursing through individual and group contact. Referrals from Social Service Department to Public Health Nursing CHDP aides provide names of those needing outreach for screening services which include immunizations. �n�tiocs�J�n given by Contra Costa County Health Department numbered 18,360 for 1976-1977 and 7,890 July 1977 - April 1978 With vaccine being provided by the State Health Department. Cg) (1) I=unization Activities supported through Project-Fundar. FY 1977-78 I IAP Specialist (PHN) 51Z Time 9828 1 School IAP Technician (R.N.) 25Z Time 2814 Fringe Benefit., 1 Intermediate Typist-Clerk lOOZ Time 9684 2455 Total Personal Services 24,781 Office Supplies $500 Clinic Supplies $500 Travel $500 1500 Total Budget 26,281 (2) Locally-Supported Immunization Activities Administrative Staff - ACD 1 Chief, Public Health Medical Services lox 1 Assistant Health Officer ACD lox _ 2 Physicians (other clinics covered by Chief, ?HHS or :IDs in CHS). 1 Nurse Epidemiologist 35Z RNs in clinics approx. 46 hrs/month (1-z3/clinic 1 PHN - 2 clinics/month PHNs - provide icrnunizatIons as part of total Screening in Child Health Screening Clinics 00C.48 (time not available) FUSs - Outreach done in home and office visits other contacts. (time not available) UNUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN Page 4" Con't. (2) Locally-Supported Immunization Activities (continued) 1 Intermediate-Typist-Clerk • 25X Health Education - (additional spent In special circumstances such as Swine Flu program) i I=unization Clinic Calendars ( 30,000) (?�) Facilities (1) Child Health Screening Clinic locations: Antioch - - Women's Club Brentwood - - Community Health Center Concord - - Health Department Office Martinez -- -"First Congregational-Church- - Pittsburg - - Community Presbyterian Church, Marina Center, 'Shore Acres Baptist Church Richmond Richmond County-Building, First-Baptist Church, Martin Luther King Center, Shields - Reid Rodeo - - Presbyterian Church San Pablo - - MacArthur Baptist Church West Pittsburg - - Liberty Church (2) Immunization Clinic locations: Antioch - - First Christian Church Brentwood - - Community Health Center Concord - - Health Department office El Sobrante - - Church of the Nazarene Pittsburg - - County Building and Marina Center Richmond - - County Building San Pablo - - First Baptist Church San Ramon - - Family Medical Center Walnut Creek - - Presbyterian Church Schools follow the California State Law mandating that DPT, Polio and Measles- iaunizations.be required for school entry-Rubella and Humps recommended. Headstart programs require DPT, -rolio, Measles; and-Rubella-immunizations prior to school entry. • . Premarital Rubella Antibody testing $5/test-cost of Health Dept testing. Total Tests: 1976" 3056---- 1st 9 months 1977 2259 with 1866 'Positive (j) Immunization Assessment Survey Immunization History and Legal Requirements For School Entry forms are distributed to schools and parents during Spring and Fall Kindergarten registration periods and in- terpreted to parents by school personnel. School districts vary in how the assessment information is obtained. Surveys are done by school nurses, health aides, secretaries or head teacher._ 1977-survey results for public and private schools showed adequate immunization level percentages to be 79Z for DPT, 90% for polio, 93% for Measles, 85Z for Rubella, and .81% for Mumps. Overall response to the survey was 93%. 00649 1%DIUNIZkTION INITIATIVE PLAN Page 5 (k) Outbreak Control Infor:ation has been distributed to private physicians, school personnel and Infections Control Nurses in hospitals and clinics throughout the county regarding the need for surveillance and early reporting. Upon report to ACD, field Investi- gation is done on an individual basis for confirmation and follow-up by the nurse epidemiologist. A follow-up call is made on selected susceptible contacts to determine outcome and notify cluster associates of exposure. Referral is made to PHD but in the event of an outbreak special health department and school or community- based clinics are held as necessary. (1) Coordination with Private Medical Sector Information is mailed to physicians in the form of a Physician's Information newsletter and a monthly Health Headlines sheet which includes morbidity and mortality reports every other month. The health department is represented by physicians at the Pediatric.Breakfast which.is .also visited on special occasions by ACD personnel. There is ongoing communication with physicians through the Alameda-Contra Costa County Medical Association, one example being through the Child Welfare Committee's School Health Committee which is -chaired by the Contra_Costa County CHDP director. Health Department staff physicians meet with hospital medical staff at regularly scheduled meetings at the nine hospitals in the county. Also there is representation at American Academy of Pediatrics meetings. (m) Use and Coordination of Volunteers Volunteers can be utilized in the activities of outreach to distribute Immunization information in the form of immunization coloring sheets, home audit folders, posters, flyers, and brochures, through various means of publicity or other activities in which their club or organization may wish to participate. Volunteers are unable to work under direct supervision of the health department, however the project coordinator may work cooperatively with a volunteer organization that sponsors an immunization project. Volunteers would be very helpful in assisting with school audits and immunization assess- ment of children of all ages provided schools are willing to give them access to school records. (n) Interrelationships with other major health providers.. There is close coordination of various departments-of Contra Costa County Medical Service s in Richmond, Martinez, and Pittsburg with health department medical and nursing staff. There is also ongoing communication with Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in Antioch, Martinez, Richmond, and Walnut Creek. The Chief of Pediatrics for Walnut Creek Kaiser serves as the Vice Chairman of the CHDP Advisory Board and the other three Chiefs of Pediatrics serve large numbers of children and report to the CHDP office. p0050 Page 6 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPAMENT 3. Progress Report (a) School Immunization Assessment and Immunization Services Project staff has continued to provide ongoing consultation and assistance to public and private schools in order to meet the goals of the National Initiative and new State-mandated immuni- zation requirements. Workshops as well as individual contact with school district per- sonnel were held this past year. Draft copies of the School Immuni- zation Handbook have been made available to public school districts as the IAP Specialist visited a representative of each district to discuss plans for follow-up on an individual school district basis. Kindergarten registration packets were distributed to public and private schools this spring and updated materials will be sent late summer. Priority is given to referring and assisting the family if necessary in obtaining an ongoing health care resource. Regularly scheduled immunization and child health screening clinics were pre- viously described. School-based clinics (two since January) are held only as indicated by special need or request. As done last year, day care centers and preschools will be sent infor- mational material on CHDP-IAP programs and resources. Additional immu- nization forms will be sent as described in Section 6. Forms are being devised as samples for use by public and private school districts - elementary, intermediate and high school. One small school district surveyed by the IAP specialist to determine effective use of the handbook and to assist in establishing appropriate suggestions to schools for follow-up as well as to determine potential problem areas and time-frames needed. (b) Surveillance and Outbreak Control The Health Department was alerted to the recent Rubella outbreak by one of the local physicians. The incidence occurred mainly in one school district high school. Close communication was established with school personnel to handld surveillance and outbreak control. The in- cidence of Rubella was serologically confirmed. Local obstetricians were notified and an intensive media campaign was held. Pregnant women who called the Health Department about concern due to possible exposure were counseled and serologic testing was done. (c) Outreach and Education 0��C5 1 Activities have included: �-T Presentations made this past year to the Child Welfare School Health Committee of the local medical society, Health Department staff, '• Page 7 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 3. Progress Report (Continued) (c) Outreach and Education (Continued) local district PTA Board, School Health Council and school nurse meetings. Information published in the Children's Council bulletin to day care centers, preschools. Bulletin to physicians to encourage record review and use of yellow California Immunization Record. Immunization Action materials and local Health Department brochures distributed community-wide through various means - Volunteer Bureau assistance, project staff, Nursing, and Health Education staff. Kindergarten registration materials sent to schools. Details are listed in individual quarterly and monthly reports. Page 8 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 4. Objectives (a) By October 1, 1979 at least 90% of all children under age 15 will be adequately immunized against measles, poliomyelitis, diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (as appropriate); at least 90% of preschool children will be adequately immunized against mumps; and 90% of prepubertal children (operationally age 12 and under) will be adequately immunized against rubella. (b) A system will be in place to ensure that comprehensive immunization ser— vices will be easily available to nearly 100 percent of the children barn each year and that no child shall be unconditionally admitted to school unless prior to first admission he or she has been fully immuni— zed against diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, poliomyelitis, and measles. ooe�3 Page 9 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT S. Activities Proposed (a) Forms developed and made available to schools for use in audit process and referral follow-up. (Depending on amount available in budget for duplication) Sample forms only to be given to public schools. (b) Training of project staff and volunteers (if available) school and county Health Department personnel and ongoing assistance through individual/group meetings. (c) Continue regularly scheduled immunization clinics. School-based clinics only to be conducted upon special request or need. (d) Continue the system of surveillance and outbreak control to provide accurate information on occurrence and containment of diseases. The County has a manual on surveillance and outbreak procedures. (e) Parents-of newborns to be alerted to the need for irmminizations. (f) Public and professional awareness campaigns will continue to be conducted. 00E-5-1 Page 10 DM- MIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 6. Method of Operation a. Immunization Assessment Program of preschools and day care centers, Headstart, elementary, intermediate and high schools. 1.) Immunization Specialist to develop samples of letters to schools, parents, verification and referral letters/tally and worksheets for use by schools. 2.) Project staff, volunteers (if available) and school staff will be provided orientation and training in project goals and objectives, activities and methods of operation proposed. 3.) Schools will be expected to audit all school records as de- fined in the School Immunization Handbook. The following method will be suggested to schools for assessment and follow- up. Schools may wish to adopt another method to achieve the objectives. a) School records are to be audited and line listings made by child and by antigen to note if a referral is necessary. b) For those requiring an update, a parent letter is to be sent containing contents of the immunization history according to the school record. Parents will be expec- ted to update the information. c) If a referral is necessary, a separate letter is to be sent with instructions to return the completed form to the school showing immunizations received and next ap; pointment scheduled. d) School employees or designated personnel will be expec- ted to update the school records-from information ob- tained from return of the parent letter. e) A tickler system is to be established to determine which children are still in need of follow-up. f) From the worksheet, a tally is to be made and forwarded on a survey form to the Immunization Specialist. g) Project staff (according to availability) will assist school personnel as necessary. b. Immunization Programs 1.) Children will continue to be referred to their usual source of health care or encouraged to obtain a resource if one does not exist. 00655 Page Y1 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PIAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 6. Method of Operation (Continued) b. Immunizations Programs (Continued) 2.) 6-7 Health Department clinics held monthly in 10 locations will continue to provide services on an ongoing basis. 3.) School-based clinics will only be considered if a special need exists or at the request of the school (depending on the number anticipated). C. Surveillance and Outbreak Control The Measles Control Coordinator will maintain the existing morbidity reporting system and follow the guidelines of the outbreak control manual in the event of an impending disease outbreak. d. Information and Education 1.) Plan to develop a pamphlet in coordination with birth certificate and health screening information to-be made available to all new- borns. 2.) Other child-oriented programs in the Health Department such as CHDP and child health screening clinics include immunization awareness. 3.) Providers of immunization services will continue to be encouraged to conduct routine record reviews and use the California Immuniza- tion Record card as the official record. _ 4.) Iamzsmization services and programs will continue to be advertised through news releases as well as other media coverage of immuniza-. tion awareness. A Bay Area-wide publicity campaign will be coordina- ted with other counties' Immunization Coordinators. - 5.) Children entering school for the first time will receive a packet of IAP and CHDP information from the school that is provided by the County Health Department. 6.) Provide consultation and outreach materials to community and school organizations volunteering time to provide immunization-awareness and assist in the Initiative activities. 0065 Page 12 IMMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 7. Evaluation a. 1.) Were developed forms appropriate for varying grade levels or did schools choose to devise their own letters and forms? 2.) Did project and school staff have sufficient understanding of the goals, and methods of operation to be able to perform the record review and encourage follow-up by the parents? 3.) Were all school records reviewed and the line listings developed? How many letters were sent home to parents? How many referral letters were sent and returned? Shown by copy of worksheet sent How many records were updated? to project staff What assistance was the project staff able to provide? What were the immunization levels of the children surveyed? How many schools have not complied with the provisions of SB-942 on an ongoing basis? b. Monthly vaccine usage reports will reflect the number of children given immunizations through the county programs. Number of school-based clinics and those numbers served will be 'assessed. C. Assess the containment of morbidity of secondary cases. Evaluate the network established for early reporting of cases. Were cases reported within 24' of notification of suspected cases? d. The evaluation of education and awareness activities will include: The amounts of distribution of education-materials; .amount-of requests for official forms e.g._ California -Immunization Record cards; degree of media coverage and programs presented, as well-as increase in attendance at immunization clinics. 000,1 Page 13 IKMUNIZATION INITIATIVE PLAN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 8. Budget Justification In order to assist the schools in conducting a county wide school immunization audit and referral program as well as an education and outreach program to achieve the proposed objectives, the following allocations are needed: Immunization Specialist — 50% time 8,730 School Immunization Technician — 1350 hours 7,626 Intermediate Typist Clerk- 11,736 Associated Salary Cost Actual 4,968 33,060 Operating Expenses Office Supplies 1,000 Clinic Supplies 800 Travel 1,200 Health Education Materials 1,000 4,000 TOTAL 37,060 006518 ORLYN H. WOOD. M.D., Health Officer o _ x 0 HEALTH DEPARTMENT ' HEALTH DEPARTMENT Dear Parent: It is important for your child to be fully immunized against serious child— hood diseases which can be prevented through immunizations. Immunizations for'Diphtheria, 'Pertussis (whooping cough) and Tetanus, Polio, and Measles_ (Rubeola, 10 day measles) are required by law for all children attend— ing schools in California. Immunizations for Rubella (German measles) and .MuTEs arehighly xecommended but not required. The information from the school record which may be incomplete or incorrect indicates that ' ' " has had the immunizations shown in the table below and that additional immunizations are probably needed. None 1 2 3 y 5 - (Specif) D.P.T. or Td if Td Polio / *Measles (Rubeola) Not required by school 1 Humps but highly recommended Rubella / If the above information is correct, please consult your doctor or usual source of health care so that your child's needed immunizations may be 'completed and return the referral form to the school within 2 weeks. If not correct, please complete this form with dates, -sign your name and -re turn it to the school immediately. Thank you. Sincerely, Q0e59 WNTNIZATION REFERRAL . Child's Kane School Grade Upon review of the school health record, it was found that the child may need additional immunizations as indicated by the enclosed letter. Please return this form to the school. To be completed by Physician or other provider: (Please indicate date) Doses 0 1 2 3 4 5 D.P.T./Td Polio Measles Mumps Rubella Immunizations still needed: Date of next appointment if needed: ❑ I hereby request exemption of my child named above, from the immunization requirements for school entry because these immunizations are contrary to my beliefs. Signature (Parent) Date ❑ Medical Exemption (A doctor's written statement to include type(s) of immunizations) exempted, the specific nature and probable duration of the medical- ' condition) OO E-60 Signature of Medical Examiner 100 Mood anM 0��M= milli Nunn now man MEN mass am noun ME all mass MEN 11111 WIN NUNN NONE NOUE was NUNN so was IMIN so an NUNN a NOUN on 0 nuouno MENEM tNSTRUCTIOKS - 1. Complete the Immunization Assessment Record using the information available in the school record. (Use pencil) a) List the student's name, address, phone number, and date of birth (or age). b) For Polio and DPT or Td check the highest number of doses received since birth and include month and year of the last dose received. You may need to count the number of dates listed for each to ascertain how many doses the child has had. c) For measles, rubella, and mumps, check "yes" if there is a record of the vaccine and include month and year if available. Since these vaccines may be given singly or in combination, check under all that are applicable. Check "no" if there is no record. If student has had the disease, please specify. d) Totals: For each column, count the number of checks and enter on the totals line. 2. Follow-Up of Students with incomplete or missing records: a) Fill out the Dear Parent letter and send with the referral letter to the parent for each student who is deficient. b) Transfer the returned immunization data onto the Health Record/Audit Sticker and the Immunization Assessment Record. 3. Transfer the totals to the Immunization Assessment Summary Sheet. - 4. Return the Assessment Record and Summary Sheet to the Contra Costa County Health Department, CHDP Office, 702 Main Street, Martinez, CA 94553. Retain a copy of the worksheet at the school site to be -used for follow-up for those students requiring additional immunizations. 5. County Immunization Assistance Program staff will maintain contact with the - schools regarding immunization follow-up. - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COLINV, CALIFORNIA- �wy.,� Z7 79' ,COTE TO CLAI'•La'dT lay.,.' nst the County, ) T'te cepa o vtc,b document matiZe to you [6 .rvtr.% Routing H-dorsements, and 1 nc {.ce cS the action taker. on yctL% ct'..''-bm 'Ott trhe 3oard Action. (All Section ) Sce.,& o6 Sup2%vizorLs f fttag•%aph 111, n¢,t'.otel , references are to California ) given pux6uant to Gove,`enment Code Secti.on6 911.8, Government Code.) ) 913, 5 915.4. P.Zea6e note the "warning" betota. Claimant: Opal Hammer, 59 East Madill St. , Antioch, Ca. 94509 Attorney: Address: A-rount: $35.54 Date Received: May 24, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on ton By mail, postmarked on 2 78 '1`9ROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel 1 �E`. �, t&hed is a copy of the above-note 1 Appl ati to File Late Claim. DATED: 9/24/78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By cf " _ i , Deputy Robbie Ou ierrez II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board-df Supervisors (Check one only) { This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so rotifyina claimant. The Board cannot act for IS days (Section 910.8) . r ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Clai / 1.6) . DATED: 7k' JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel,�Z�,z e!!a Deputy III. BOARD ORDER 3y unanimous vote of Supervisors present ` (Check one only) ( X) This Claim is rejected in full. ( ) This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: gJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by Deputy JAMi _ O WARNING TO CLAI,tANT (Government Code Sections 911.8 & 913 You stave o nZ y 6 moi 'L6 6-tom the g o o t.,i.6 notice to you ZDtin wh i clk to 6iZe a couA t action on tV,6 .tej ec ted CCaim (see Govt. Code Sec. 945.5) otc 6 months j,-tom -Jte de;U4Z ott your Appzication to Fi,Z2 a Late Ctaim tt;WUn tch ch to vett, ion a cotAt -No,% •%e;ie6 atom Section 945.4'6 claim-6iZi.rg deadti.ne (bee Sec:i.cn 946.6) . You nt2u 6eeh, the advice o' any a„tcaney oS you,% choice in connection tvitfl. • 4,1,3 r ,;Le•Y. ?' ctou wcu�t to eonsuAt art atto%tneu, you 6houId do so •tmmedi.ateZy. !V. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or application by mailing a copy of this doc,w-nent, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of ;.;pis Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: July 3, 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, Deputy By�2z 'Jpmip *1 V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County AdministX 10- r"`—TO: - Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim or Application and Board Order. DATED: T`y1 97 R County Counsel, 3y County Ad--inistrator, By 00662 ?. l Rev. 3/76 F _ MAY r 1978 me SOA=l,a , Viso* COStR o• 414e 611� Ij�.�2�,i'��r''�'�,�j�?"I+ a•(,e `��:J` G��,i.,�"7✓,�,,'/'""1. \WI •/ - i - - =, - (' f /i �n; ,e Oeez,�,X�� 0 5- . r {�{(/'^"'�.t''+/� `"' � Y 1.r,4�..} - �/�tr^'I/•L�lt � �"' Jrrf��l:+t.�/ � •M /f\rte f J6 e -� � F � f NEW Microfilmed with board order • � BOARD ACTION J � ' SOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNn. , CaLIFORINIA June 27, 1978 R. , TO CLaI:'tAXT Clain A-airst the County, ) The copy of th-&s document maiZed to you d,6 You% Routing Endorsements, and rotiCce c5 tdi_- actL-n akcn on foLvt c _A,u iilE Board action. (All Section ) So,-.%d o6 Supe%,.v.tsotz ;Patag,-Lapp 111, be,t'ctu) , references are to California ) given pwtsuantt to Goveanment Code Seeti.on6 911.8, Government Code.) ) 9130 ° 915.4. Ptease note the "wann.ing" be.Zow. Claimant: Guirguis N. Guirguis, 914' Sandpoint Dr. , Rodeo, Ca. 94572 Attorney: Address: Amount: $185.32 via Co. Admin. Date Received: May 25, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on May 25, 1978 By mail, postmarked on FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel `oSL' Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or Application to File Late Claim. �oh6TED: May 26, 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By , 1L Deputy amxe o son 11. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( ' ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . r ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Clain (Section 911.6) . DATED: �;D JOHN B. CLAUSE.4, County Counsel, By. r ('7 -._ Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) ( X ) This Claim is rejected in full. (: ) This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATE. �-�ung 27, 1978J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by r �L �i�leQ,D'� , Deputy WAR\'I.NG TO CLAIINtANT (Government Code Sections 911.8 & 913 You have. ont.y 6 months a%om the g oi1 ;C,,_6 ,to.xce .to you rise which .to -4ize a court action on .th.i,6 %ejeeted C aim (.see Govt. Code Sec. 945.5) of u monthz S.tom the deniat oS youA Application to Fite a Late Cta.im ttu thin touch to pet tion a cota'tt 'or, het;i.e6 6-tom Section 945.4's claim-6iZing deadline (see Section 946.6)". You may seelk .tlte advice oS any a;to,%ney ob youA choice ,in connection tci.& .tzi,s matte"L. Ij you want to conzuZt an attokneu, you 6houtd do so immediatay. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: . (l) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or application by mailing a copy of this doc,.ment, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. DATED: July �. 19T$J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By , Deputy Jamie L. jolI nson V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors ` Received copies of this Claim or application and Board Order. DATED: ,T„1 X 3-s l q 7 8 County Counsel, By County Administrator, By 8. 1 09664 Rev. 3/78 t, LE. Co-►„a Costa County RECEIVED N1 AY a5 1978 [JAY 2 5 1978 J:R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SWERVISORS Office of CO i COSTA CO. B G�h »D� Ccunty Administrator CLAIM AGAINST COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA (Government Code, Sec. 910) Date: Gentlemen: _ The undersigned hereby presents the following claim against the County- of Contra Costa: 1. Date of accident or-occurrence: /I 9.7g 2. Name and address-of claimant:, Cr- CA _ R 57 �. 3. Description and place of the accident or occurrence: See attached letter. 4. Names of County employees involved, and type, make and number of equipment if known: County workers in charge of resurfacing the streets, from the public works department. I notified your office immiadetly on 5-15 78, and I was advised that au would f nd out the names of the persons involved. 5. Describe the ky�nd and va ue of damage and attach estimates: Estimate from Miracle Auto Painting $ 168.29 Car Cover - GrandAufi 1 $ 17.03 $ 185.32 Total r Si nature Clain Against County Of Contra Costa -0''1°'1 CO!.firvn r (Gove_--nment Code, Sec. 910) a. � t` ".,,'!.Y- Office of CzU,'--t, Adminis;rc;or Gentlemen: On monday 5-15-78 around 1:00 p.m. our car was parked in the in the street in front of our home at 914 Sandpoint Dr. The county workers came and knocked on our door and handed my wife a notice to remove the car immediately as they were going to resurface the street and apply a coating of oil and sand, in the next half hour. She told them that she did not have the key to the car, and they should have given her a notice at least one day before work on the street. They indicated that notices were left on Friday 5-12-789 but they ran out of notices for the lower half of the residents of Sandpoint; (Thus we did not recieve a notice, and neither did several of our neighbors). To protect ti-.e car from oil and sand my wife immediately gent to Grand Auto in San Pablo and bought a car cover worth $ 17.03 dollars. jnskn,ite of all efforts to protect the car, oil and sand got on the car and dryed, and now it is embeded in the paint. I have enclosed an estimate for removal of the oil and sand, and paint. Sincerely',yours 5/23/78 . Y 0066 TV- ti r —ESTIMATE — MIRACLE ESTIMATE —MIRACtE AUTO °AN T ING I SIGN NEWSPAPER 10533 SAN PA3L0 AVE. EL /A _ YELLOW PAGES >� EL CLRRI Z 0, CA 94530 OTHER CUSTOM ER�ifyt /�� �,. ( K /`.(�(� S - ODOMETER NAME I :) V./ -L READING DATEHOME - �!1 + I I�.� l PHONE BY NO. - ADDRESS �` CITY AND 1 3�O ��^� BUSINESS(�Uis CIL YEAR AND �� � STATE •�' t PHONE I6( 7 MODEL s / . ❑ENAMEL(MAT.S19.95) ❑ACRYLIC(MAT 524.95 ❑ MIRATHANE(MAT.S29.95) PRICE COLOR- LA30RMATERIAL C METALLIC • PAINTING 'el ✓ ❑ STARBURST :./f+� �•L� �� ❑ SEALER 41 --1 TOUCH-UP ❑ NO•MARPROTECTION r ❑ DOOR JAMBS EXTRA PREP - ❑ WHEELSi pt COMPLETE COLOR CHANGE r 1 ❑ TU TONE ❑ MATCH COLORIr . %L,� ❑ VINYL TOP RENEWAL ❑ PICKUP &PANELS - - BALANCE FORWARD TOTAL PAINT SUB TOTAL MATERIAL •/ .3 . WORK DESCRIPTION SUBLET LABOR PARTS MAT. rs`t Office of I • TOT.TAX SALES �•�j TOTAL LABOR TOTAL PAINT HOURS LABOR ESTIMATED 8Y TOTAL L � WORK AUTHORIZATION HRSJp TOTALPARTS + CUSTOMER SIGNATURE X TOTAL MATER!AL 5 PER.HR SUBLET i TOTAL S TAX ( ✓• I=,��' VOID AFTER 10 DAYS. TOTAL THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE. NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CRACKING OF BODY PLASTIC FROM PREVIOUS REPAIRS 22, full v% .moi y.._ �' -^� .' _ • » - - CIO •� "rev � ..� • ru � p M mc A rnZ = + x ~CA :•J In CA i v O20 �• des -• � 3 ` qt ru , E19P ' iPt•8;+0.77 , CARDHOLDER COPY I: BOARD ACTION SOA;D OF SUPEMSORS OF CONTPa COSTA CO NMY, CALIFOPUNIA June 27, 1978 \OTE TC CLAI1LaNT Claim Against the County, T.e copy o f t s document raited to you i,3 uowt Routing Endorsements, and ) ;w ice of the action .takcn on your cZaim by .the Board action. (All Section } o"aatd c4 Supavczor�s (Patagtaph 111, beZm,), references are to California ) given rwsuant to Government Code Secuo&3 911.3, Government Code.) ) 913, s 915.4. P.tease note .the "accvutiing" betoto. Claimant: Carol Ann Boss .and Lillian Boss, 5637 Bayview Avenue, Richmond, California 94804 ' Attorney: David Krashna, Attorney at Law Address: Lord & Krashna, 145 Park Place, Point Richmond, California 94801 Amount: $400,000 Date Received: Play 23, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on By mail, postmarked on riay 22, 1978 Rcrfi FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel a�Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or application to File Late Claim. c D_;1,�c A •''`Plav 23, 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By y1Qjm Deputy JR-Mie L. aghngon II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Check one only) ( •� This Clain complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( } Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . { ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Claim ; n -2-11. DATED: JOF.14 B. CLAUSE,-4, County Counsel, < • -- Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) (X ) This Clain is rejected in full. ( ) This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Board's Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: jUne 27. 1978J• R. OLSSON, Clerk, by X2&4 j ,j ..t�.iY7�� , Deputy Ja t u WARNIXG TO CLAIMAW (Government Code Sections 911.8 E 913) you have c,7 y 6 mon ttom the tg o6 Lt.b notice .to you Z- Li.n cohi.ch .to 6 to a eou tt action on thi4 rejected CX.aim (see Govt. Code Sec. 945.6) o,% S months 6,tom the devaZ of you,% Appti.catien to Fite a Late Cta m t tl-tin tcbrich .to Peti tion a cou4t Sot Eeti.eL ..tom Section 945.4'Ss eta m-6i,Ung deadline (see Sec�Uon 946.6) . Yeu may seek .the advice of3 any attorney ob yowt choice in connection Loi-di t,'t,us mattea. 1i clou wart to consult cut atto•%ney, you sftoutd do so immediateZtr. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. ,� DATED: j I l l y13, 1 o7 R J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By ���" 'Z! Deputy is V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator 'r erk of the Board of Supervisors Received copies of this Clain or Application and Board Order. DATED July g, 1978 County Counsel, By County Administrator, 3y 8. ? ev. 3/78 . N \ t I CLAIM 1 � 1 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 91 F 3 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS , CONTRA COSTA COUN Y, f'AAY �-1 1973' 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 9 553 j. a. oaw.1 4 CLERK BOARD Or 5UPERVISOR5 NT COSTA CO- 5 This is a claim presented by Attorney DA KRASHNA, of the 6 law firm of LORD & KRASHNA, acting on behalf of the claimants 7 as hereinafter set forth: 8 1. NAME OF CLAIMANTS: CAROL ANN BOSS 9 LILLIAN BOSS 10 2. ADDRESS OF CLAIMANTS: 5 637 Bayview Avenue Richmond, California 94804 it 3. NOTICE TO BE SENT TO: DAVID KRASHNA, Attorney at Law, 12 LORD & KRASHNA, 145 Park Place , Point Richmond , California 94801 13 4. DATE OF OCCURRENCE GIVING RISE TO CLAIM ASSERTED: 14 February 9, 1978. 15 5. PLACE AND OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE OCCURRENCE 16 17 OF TRANSACTION: On February 9 , 1978 , while claimant CAROL ANN BOSS 18 was a resident of, and under the care and supervision of the 19 Work Training Center West, located at 3563 San Pablo Dam Road, 20 Richmond, Calfornia 94803 , Claimant CAROL ANN BOSS was sexually assaulted and abused by two male residents of the Center who each 21 32 forcibly raped her. Mr. David DuBois , a supervisor at the Center, was a witness to this incident. Claimant CAROL ANN BOSS was sent 9;3 24 home on the same day and immediately informed her mother , Claimant LILLIAN BOSS , of this occurrence. Claimant LILLIAN BOSS made 15 immediate arrangements with Brookside Hospital , 2000 Vale Road, 26 San Pablo, California , to have tests conducted on her daughter. 27 Claimant CAROL ANN BOSS has also made one visit to the Richmond 28 OUs (QM«rofilmed with board order 1 Health Clinic , 100-38th Street , Richmond, Calfornia, and to a 2 psychiatrist. 3 6. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INJURY, DAMAGE OR COST INCURRED SO 4 FAR AS IT MAY BE KNOWN AT THE DATE OF PRESENTATION OF THE CLAIM: 5 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors funds , and enters into 6 contracts to fund, the Work Training Center West to provide adequat 7 care, supervision and control of Center residents . This incident 8 was caused by the failure of the Center staff to provide adequate 9 care, supervision and control of Center residents. 10 a. Claimant CAROL ANN BOSS has suffered and continues 11 to suffer great emotional and mental damage , as well as humiliation 12 and insult to her personal dignity and well-being, as a direct 13 result of this incident. 14 Claimant CAROL ANN BOSS is also suffering daily from being 15 unable to attend the WORK TRAINING CENTER WEST where she could 16 normally receive the special care she requires but is fearful of 17 returning due to this incident. 18 b. Claimant LILLIAN BOSS has suffered and continues to 19 suffer great mental anguish and emotional distress as a direct 20 result of what occurred to her daughter. 21 Claimant LILLIAN BOSS also suffers from being unable 22 to send her daughter back to the C enter because of her and her 23 daughter' s fears of what could occur again at the center. . 24 Claimant LILLIAN BOSS also expects to have to pay money to send 25 her daughter to a private care center. 26 7. THE AMOUNT CLAIMED AS OF THE DATE OF PRESENTATION WITH 27 BASIS OF COMPUTATION THEREOF: 28 a. For claimant CAROL ANN BOSS: # -2- 006'Aj1 1 General damages in the sum of $ 350,000 in compensation for the emotional and mental damage incurred and will continue to incur as 9 a direct result of this incident , and special" damages at a rate of 4 $48. 00 per day for each day claimant must remain home and lose the 5 care provided at the Center commencing from February 9, 1978 until s she is able to return safely to the Center. 7 b. For Claimant LILLIAN BOSS: 6 General damages in the sum of $50,000 for her mental anguish and 9 emotional distress caused directly as a result of the damage caused 10 to her daughter; special damage at a rate of $60 per day for each with care 11 day claimant must provide her daughter/ which would normally be 14 provided at the Center; and, as special damage, any money she must 13 expend to send her daughter to another carte censer., 14 15 DATED May 22, 197816 DKICASHNA 17 Attorney for Claimants 18 18 90 21 22 23 2 25 006'72 227 t 28 -3- .BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU,-."rf, CALIFOP,"4'IA `;OTE TO CLAI�LANT Claim Against the County, ) The copy o this document mw„tZed to you is you= Routing Endorsements, and ) wti.ce cSI .ute actccn ta!xr. on you% ct in by die Board Action. (All Section ) n"oatd of Supe- i.sots (Patagtaph III, be-&-w), references are to California ) given pwtsuant to Government Code Sectionz 911.8, Government Code.) ) 913, 0 915.4. P.Zeasa note the "warning" be,Zocu. Claimant: George Martinez, 1212 — 87th Aven. , Oakland, Ca. Attorney: Address: Amount: $1,000,000 Date Received: May 25, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on By mail, postmarked on 5/24/78 I. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or 7Aplicatio ile Late Claim. `t ,IT D: 9/25/78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By r Deputy r obbie Gu ierrez II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk of--the Board o S .pervisors (Check one only) ( ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.3) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Claim (Section 911.6) . - DATED: -.2L- 70 JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By ( Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) ( X ) This Claim is rejected in full. (` ) This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . :---' I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Boards Order entered in its minutes._for this date. DATED: June 27, lg78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by cR�� 44� ljj Deputy Jamre.T. Jmen WARNING TO CLAI lA`T (Governmaent Code Sections You have, onZy 6 moi 2.s atom tJte mat4cng o6 tki,s notice to you a un which to 6iZe a cocutt ae;i.on on thin rejected CZa m (see Govt. Code Sec. 945.6) o,7- 6 ,Y6 months 0 tom .the der2.iuZ of youh Apptication .to Fite a Late C&.m w,i tir i.n w i ch, to xtLtion a court 3'04 .teti.eS 6nom Section 945.4'z cZ im-6iZi.ng deadf-i.ne (gee Sect ion 946.6) . You may seed t,'te advice o' any a ttohney o' yout choice .in connection iaidt t,'L,i s matte-t. I, you must .to eonsutt an atto,%ney, you should do so .immed ia.i eZy. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: . (1) County Counsel, (2) County administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. / DATED: .fuly3. 1 q7 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By J Deputy Jamie L. Johnsorl V. FROM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Deceived copies of this Claim or Application and Board Order. DATED: ,Tilly l o7R County Counsel, By 00673 County Administrator, 3y 8. 1 Rev. 3/78 F � ED -sih-21978 BOAVWSUPMISO;s cq. r_� _ ---_ -- --- 7 av -._-- Llo~_i!?1_..a.re, -6..5 fi,o_It. a-v-Vs o2_F-ebrLtar��.-_may - ---- ------. ---Lq_:L ,_.��tff _ _ n� t __co ----- -----. -- _ ._ _.----- ---__..Froln._���►rid __� Lt --- _ -Y..(-lo -a—d-a. -----�--- - oLhcr_—lam avd: 11e�-_Lr-L-�a -,._.dn6._—--- - cod:rn_. _-- ----- I - cfil�r1 C�. ;,-Ct"r r+ on.. _0_� +hz . . �n3, �E tri 1 n_C:.t_rr<Zd - -- so - Fcr. __--low-Know-n. Mlaofilmed,•m6fl -E rd orc'1er---- 6p-tad- _h PAA C7 ine Z t- BOARD ACTION BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU.\7 ', CALIFORNIA June 27, 1978 ROTE TO CLAI' AYr Claim Against the County, ) :he copy os' v_o do e–unei'.t ►=tc'.ed to you .is acwt Routing Endorsements, and ) notice of .uta 2c,i ion ,4:.Er on t�owY c,�air.� bit t':2 Board Action. (All Section ) a"oat.d of Supe�rv.cscr,.s (Pat.agkaplt III, below), references are to California ) given pwtsuant to Gove n meat Code Sections 911.5, Government Code.) ) 913, 5 915.4. Ptease' note the "Watn.i.ng" Wow. Claimant: James F. Wortham, c/o. California Department of Corrections, Sacramento, Ca. AKX02h1= Send Notices to: Mrs. Clemetene Wortham, 2498 Hinmley Ave. , Richmond, Ca. &xxMx Amount: $100,000,000 Date Received: May 26, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on By mail, postmarked on May 25, 1978 REGEI. FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel f0- 16 Attached .is a copy of the above-noted Claim or Application to File Late Claim. .st cov."s!..,. fl4TEb: May 26, 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By Deputy Jamie L. Johnson H. FROM: County Counsel r TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors /(Check one only) ( V ) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Claim (Section 911.6) . - DATED: ^ III.-S.7- ?� JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By� �„�,G ,�— Deputy .- III.-. .- BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) X ) This Claim is rejected in full. This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Boards Order entered in its minutes for this date. DATED: June '27, 1978J. R. OLSSOV, Clerk, byDeputy z rig WARNING TO CLAIMA:\T (Government Code Sections 911.3 G 913) You have, o nt y 6 mo 'r s Srcom V.e. maaAng o6 Zua notice ce -co you s which to Site a couat action ori thio rcejected Claim (.see Govt. Code Sec. 945.6) oro 6 momthA a tom the den i a.Z o4. yours AppUca.�i o n to Fite a We Ua im telt rin which to petition a cotctt O'o.% %e,Uej .tom Section 945.4's ctaim-JiZing deadti.ne (see Section 946.6) you may s eeh the advice o' any a ttcnney o f .yowl choice in connection w.itn this n tten.. I' you want to conzatt an attoAneu, you should do so .immedi.atieZc . I'v. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: 1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29:03. DATED: ,I„t 1, 30 1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By r% / ,,Y Deputy c.%i?, L. Jonr:rnrl V. FROt1: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Aeminist_ator TO- Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim or Application and Board Order. DATED: July 3, 1978 County Counsel, By County Administrator, By to I 8.1 Rev. 3/78 CLALi1I ACAFITST = COUNTS' OF (Farsuant to Section 9-70, et seq., a rn e- Co e` Name, address and ozone :number of clai .a=t, JAZ S E. WOR TIH A3�_, 17_mate HY a 1978 c/o California Department of Corre =ons J. ot�50;3 Sacramento, Cg California Ric BOARD O- suPERVISORS � CONTRA COSTA CO- � Nam, and address of Parson tow .om any :c':=.es cc racer �_ .. ouid be sent. Date and timewhen damage or injury occurred. Location of occurrence. j IWYZAtz Circumsta. ces of occurrence. c6o o� T�H�An �u�6s Description of loss, damage or injury. ., 4777 Q.) 14Eacl4-1 A). .1 =ne(s of County employea(s) causing injury, damage or loss, if known. 104AW Amo - claimed at present including estimated amount of any prospective loss: a19, 000000 I\Tame Wdddress of witnesses, doctors and/or hospitals7oR sr 4L-- '5;W orti Leo a� leot4l_ 4V�i4,y 141, Lid Claim mustbe ssanec a_n3 cateq ey cTaizr_ant or person acting on clair:an's Dated: Sisnature of claimant or person acting on his behalf. Claim to be delivered or mailed to: The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa lst Floor, Administration Bldg. .Martinez, CA 91-1553 /�"„' V0 11 Microfilmed with board order - 5OARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMM, CALIFORNIA `OTE TO CLAINONT Claim Against the County, ) The copy US t+_ib doctunent traiZeY to You fd YOUA Routing Endorsements, and ) t,Dtice o f he action .tafien on :four c,,Za m bar the Board action. (all Section ) ooatd o Superv.isoAz (Pa-,ag'utph I11, 6eZcieI references are to California ) given runsuant to Covetnmeftt Code Sections 911.8, Government Code.) ) 913, ` 915.4. Pteaze note the "wa4ning" below. Claimant: Jerry Vargas & Lola Vargas, 37957 Granville Dr. , Fremont, Ca.. Attorney: Charles Rothbaum, Esq. Address: 120 - 11th St. , Oakland, Ca. 94607 Amount: $1,000,000.00 Date Received: May 25, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on By mail, postmarked on 5/24/78 ntiG�\I.> moi-FROM: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO Re 51125 County Counsel li r �� 1a � �{ ,,Attached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or Applicationto File Late Claim. • C,O !' tc ,✓ •5/25/78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By ¢ Deputy Rbbbic/Gtitierre H. FROM: Cotmty Counsel TO: Clerk of the Boat" Supervisors ,,-(Check one only) This Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. ( ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8) . ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a Late Claim 911.6) . - DATED: `J' -2�- %�' JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel, By C Deputy III. - BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present (Check one only) ( -X) This Claim is rejected in full. ( )- This Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Boards Order entered in ti its minutes for this date. DATED: June 27, M1978 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by �c�Jirr��p��/ � Deputy JamieL. Jorinson WARNING TO CLaPta\T (Government Code Sections 911.9 & 913) You 'tave orty 6 months jaom the maZ&mg o6 tw n6zice to you w `Lin. cv,'zie,'t to 4,ite a cow-Et action on tom' U xejected Cfaim (see Govt. Code Sec. 945.5) of o mon7,hz tom the defuat of gout Appti.cation .to Fite a Late Ctat:m taLdi.in tdfiich .to r,,i i;ti.on a cow% Soh heP,i.ej nom Section 945.4's claim-Siting deadt ne (see Section 946.6) . You may seee t'ie advice oS any auohney oS gout choice .in connection with .tftis +ra telt. IS you want to corsai-t an attokney, you .shouzd do so .cmmediateZy. IV. FROM: Clerk of the Board TO: . (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or application. 1!e notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. / DATED: July 3, 1978J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By off/ Deputy Jan-lie L. Johnson V. FRUM: (1) County Counsel, (2) County Administrator TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim or Application and Board Order. DATED: .Tu l y . _I_U8 7 8 County Counsel, By County Ae-ministrator, By 006 6 8. 1 'Rev. ;/78 `l CHARLES ROTHBALJMp ES L Q L E 120 11th St. 2 Oakland, Ca. 94607 Mpy X51978 Telephone: (415) 835-0746 ' .3 I. ecssoniw�to�r 4arauc �o� CXF �ca Attorney for Claimants 5 6 7 IN THE IIIATTER OF THE CLAIM OF ) 8 JERRY VARGAS and LOI,A VARGAS, ) CLAIM PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT Claimants, ) CODE, SECTION 9.10 . 10 v. CONTRA COSTA COUNTYZHERIFFS' 11 DEPARTN NT, THE COUNTY OF CONTRA) 12 COSTA and DOES I THROUGH X. ) INCLUSIVE, ) 13 Defendants. ) 14 15 Claimants hereby present this claim to the Contra Costa County .. 16 Sheriffs Department and the County 'of Contra Costa pursuant to 17 Government Code, Section 910. 18 1. The post office address of Claimants is 37957 Granville Dr. , 19 Fremont, California. 20 2. The post office address to which Claimants desire notice 21 of this claim to be sent is 120 11th St. Oakland, California 94607. 22 3. On May 19, 1978 at 37957 Granville Dr. , Fremont, California .. 23 Claimants received personal injuries under the following circum- 24 stances: At approximately 4:30 p.m. officers of the Contra Costa 25 County Sheriffs Department assaulted, falsely imprisioned for ap- 26 proximately 3 hours, threatened, and harrassed Claimants, and 27 illegally seized items of personal property belonging to Claimants. 28 CHART. It0771BAUM 006'19 ATTORNEY AT LAW 120-11TH STREET OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94407 MiaQfilmed with board order TELEPHONE (413) 89S-07," —1— 1 4, So far as it is knovrn to the Attorney for the Claimants 2 at the date -of the- filing of this claim, Claimants have incurred .3 damages in the amount::of. $500,000.00 as a result ofthe actions 4 of the Contra Costa County Sheriffs Department as alleged in Para 5 graph 3 .above, 6 5. At the time of presentation of this claim; Claimants clai 7 damages in the amount of $500,000,00 compensatory damages due to 8 injuries and $500;000.00 punitive damages. . 9 10 Dated: May 23, 1978 ChA.RLES'ROT�HBAUDI Attorney, for Claimants 32 13 14 15 . 16 . 1? 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _ .00680 4FIARLFS ROTHBAUS1 ATTORNEY AT LAW 120-11TH STREET OAKLAND.CALIFORNIA 94607 TELEPHONE (415) 893-0746 4 ..� BOARD OF SUPERVISOKS OF CONTRA COSTA-COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 N NOTE TO CLAIMANT n Clain Against the County, ) The copy o6 thiA .ocuMetit n e to you is yowt Rout- Endorsements, and ) notice oS dte action taker. on your cZaia by a=e Board Action. (All Section ) Soald oS Supeavi.sopA (Panagtaplt III, Wow), references are to California ) giveft pursuant to Govetrrment Code Sections 911.8, Government Code.) ) 413, 0 915.4. Ptwe note the "a'+arr .M" below. Claimant: Denice Hughes and Da7nia Richardson, by & through their Guardian ad Litem, Merlin Hill, 139 Clearland Dr. , Pittsburg Attorney: e. robert (bob) wallach & David B. Baum Address: 43 Iron Ship Plaza, S.F. , Ca. 94111 Amount: $4,000,000.00 Date Received: May 24, 1978 By delivery to Clerk on 5/24/78 By mail, postmarked on G �•' yI;y� FRO14: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors TO: County Counsel ttached is a copy of the above-noted Claim or Applicatto File Late Claim. a' ATED: 9fes4UR J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, ByDeputy —Adoble UMIerrez 43 II. FROM: County Counsel TO: Clerk TW the Board of Supervisors ✓ (Check one only) { ) I his Claim complies substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2. C ) This Claim FAILS to comply substantially with Sections 910 and 910.2, and we are so notifying claimant. The Board cannot act for 15 days (Section 910.8). ( ) Claim is not timely filed. Board should take no action (Section 911.2) . ( ) The Board should deny this Application to File a e Claim QaTEJ: 4^ ..�5^•2Jotirr B. CLAUSEv, County Counsel, Deputy III. BOARD ORDER By unanimous vote of Supervisors present -- (Check one only) C j):This Claim is rejected in full. ( . • -)"This, Application to File Late Claim is denied (Section 911.6) . I certify that this is a true and correct copy of the Boardb Order entered in `,. its minutes for this date. DATED: June 27, 1978J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, by Deputy %JaMle L. Jonnson . WARMING TO CLAMANT (Government Code Sections 911-91 6 910 -You have onty o mo 6Aom the MMUARg 06 ZaA notMe to you iZUtin which to .iZe a cowtt action on thia %ejected M m (see Govt. Code Sec. 445.6) on 6 months j tom the denims of.youA App icati on to Esse a Late Min within which to pe;.Eti.on a eoutt 5'oA retcej Bkom Section 945.41a e&.10-S.iti.ng deadP,ine Iaee Section 446.61. You Duty 6 eek the advice o' any atit onney o J yowt choice .in connection with, this Mttet. I; YOU want to consuttt an attotneu, ou ahoutd do Ao .immediateZc . IV. FRC:!: Clerk of the- Board TO: . —CIT—County Counsel, (2) County Administrator Attached are copies of the above Claim or Application. We notified the claimant of the Board's action on this Claim or Application by mailing a copy of this document, and a memo thereof has been filed and endorsed on the Board's copy of this Claim in accordance with Section 29703. / DAT D:July- 3. 1978 1 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk, By Deputy JaMiC L.Jo ns n V. , FROM: (1) Cour•.ty Counsel, (2) County Administrator TO: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Received copies of this Claim or application and Board Order. DATED: .?t:iy 3, 1978 County Counsel, By County Administrator, By , 4 8.1 Rev. 3/78 1 e. robert (bob) wallach & David B. Baum 2 CIVILADVOCATES TOWNHOUSE 43 IRON SHIP PLAZA F L E D 3 SAN FRANCISCO 94111 (415)956.5544 1 2 4 & RICHARD D. SANDERS, Esq. 5 Sanders, Dodson, Hinton, May & Rives J. P_ OLSM 2211 Railroad Avenue OOjAD COSTAPERV CO.��� 6 'Pittsburg, California 94565 7 (415) 432-3511 Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 9 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 10 11 TO: CONTRA .COSTA COUNTY HOSPITAL, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL 12 SERVICES, DR. PHYLLIS TAYLOR 13 14 The following Claim for Damages is hereby made against 15 you, as follows: 16 A. Name and Address of Claimants: The claimants are 17 Denice Hughes, a minor, age two months, and Dayna Richardson, a minor, 18 age twenty-three months, by and through their grandmother, to be 19 appointed as their Guardian ad Litem, Merline Hill, 139 Clearland 20 Drive, Pittsburg, California. 21 B. Address to which notice is to be sent: e. robert 22 (bob) wallach and David B. Baum, 43 Iron Ship Plaza, San Francisco, 23 California 94111. 24 C. Circumstances of the occurrence: Marian Denise 25 Pounds, now deceased, was the mother of claimants Denice Hughes and 26 Dayna Richardson. The decedent Marian Denise Pounds was admitted to 27 the Contra Costa County Hospital on or about February 17, 1978 for 28 the purposes of delivering a child and for all necessary care and 29 treatment. Claimants contend that the Contra Costa County Hospital, 30 Contra Costa County Medical Services and their agents, employees and 31 attending physicians were negligent in the care, treatment and atten- 32 tion given to the decedent while she was a patient at Contra Costa 33 County Hospital, and in the performance of a Caesarian section opera- 34 tion for the delivery of her child, in the administration of a general 35 anesthesia to said patient, and in the follow-up care and post- 36 anesthetic observations, supervision, management and control of the 00682 Microfilmed with board order 1 decedent while the decedent was still under the influence of a general 2 anesthesia; that as a result of such conduct, Marian Denise -Pounds was 3 permitted to undergo a cardiorespiratory arrest on February 17, 1978, 4 which caused the decedent to be deprived of sufficient oxygen to main- s tain normal bodily functions, so that she suffered anoxic brain damage 6 of. a severe, permanent and irreparable nature, with attendant convul- 7 sions, which condition caused her death on March 19, 1978. 8 The cardiac arrest, brain damage and death of decedent 9 occured as a result of the following: (1) Excessive amounts of . 10 anesthetic agents were administered to the decedent in the course of . 11 the said operation by the attending anesthesiologist," Phyllis Taylor, 12 M.D. , so that the patient's- respiration was severely depressed; (2) 13 inadequate and negligent care, observation, supervision, management 14 and control of the decedent was provided in the course of said. surger 15 and thereafter by Dr. Taylor; (3) an endotracheal tube was removed 16 improperly by Dr. Taylor and at a- time when the patient was not in 17 control of her respirations; (4) the patient was improperly monitored* 18 and supervised thereafter; (5) the patient was not taken to a 14 recovery room for appropriate observations, supervision, management 20 and control; (6) the patient was returned to a ward of said hospital 21 while still in an unconscious and dangerous condition; (7) the condi 22 tion of the decedent dictated that immediate medical procedures, 23 management and treatment be instituted, but no appropriate treatment 24 was given to the decedent, and appropriate vital signs were not 25 recorded; (8) the physical condition of the decedent continued to 26 deteriorate in the presence of the anesthesiologist, Dr. Taylor, and 27 in the presence of nurses employed by Contra Costa County Hospital, 28 but appropriate medical treatment, including an endotrachael tube, 29 was not provided; and (9) a cardiac arrest team was not called until 30 the decedent had suffered irreparable brain damage due to oxygen 31 deprivation. 32 Further, the above acts and omissions on the part of the 33 anesthesiologist, Dr. Taylor, were done in the course and scope of he 34 agency and employment on behalf of Contra Costa County General 35 Hospital and Contra Costa County Medical Services, or as an ostensibl 36 agent of Contra Costa County General Hospital, and were known or e. robert (bob) wallach &David B. Baum CIVIL ADVOCATES 0068.3 —2 1R TOWNHOUSE 43ONSHIP PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO 94111 (415)956-5544 1 should have been known to agents and employees of the Contra Costa - 2 County Hospital and Contra Costa County Medical Services, in that 3 similiar events and incidents had previously occurred involving Dr: 4 Taylor as the attending anesthesiologist, resulting in serious injur- 5 ies to and deaths of other patients at the Contra Costa County Hospi- 6 tal, which injuries and deaths were well known to those in a:"position 7 of authority at Contra Costa County Hospital and Contra Costa County 8 Medical Services, but that appropriate steps, procedures, sanctions 9 and precautions to avoid further such injuries and deaths were not 10 taken by Contra,,Costa County Hospital and Contra Costa County Medical 11 Services, but Dr. Taylor was permitted to act as an attending 12 anesthesiologist without appropriate supervision, steps, procedures, 13 sanctions or precautions so that additional injuries and deaths were 14 likely to occur, and did occur in-the case of the decedent Marian 15 Denise Pounds. . 16 Further, the Contra Costa County Hospital lacked 17 appropriate facilities for attending and treating patients post- 18 operatively, including an appropriate recovery room for post-surgical 19 patients like Marian Denise Pounds. 20 The aforesaid knowledge, acts and omissions on the part 21 of the Contra Costa County Hospital and Contra Costa County Medical 22 Services contributed proximately and concurrently to the anoxic brain 23 damage suffered by Marian Denise Pounds and her eventual death. 24 As a result of the death of Marian Denise Pounds, the 25 claimants, Denice Hughes and Day.na Richardson, by their grandmother 26 and Guardian ad Litem, Merline Hill, have been deprived of the comfort 27 care, society,,- .companionship, services and protection of a kind and 28 loving mother. 29 D. Description of Injuries and Damages: (1) Marian 30 Denise Pounds was permitted to undergo a cardiorespiratory arrest on 31 February 17, 1978, which caused the decedent to be deprived of 32 sufficient oxygen to maintain normal bodily functions, so that she 33 suffered anoxic brain damage of a severe, permanent and irreparable 34 nature, with attendant convulsions, which condition caused her death 35 on March 19, 1978. (2) As a direct and proximate result of said 36 matters, the claimants Denice Hughes and Payna Richardson by and e. roberc (bob) Wallach & David B. Baum CIVIL ADVOCATES -3- TOWNHOUSE 3- T9WNHOUSE 43 IRON SHIP PLAZA f 0 i r<J' SAN FRANCISCO 94111 (415)956.5544 1 through their Guardian ad Litem, Merline Hill, have been deprived of 2 the comfort, care, society, companionship, services and protection of 3 a kind .and loving mother. 4 E. Employees Causing Injuries and Damages: Claimant does 5 not know the names of all employees of the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 6 HOSPITAL and CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES who caused-such 7 injuries and damages. Dr. Phyllis Taylor was the attending . 8 anesthesiologist; Drs. Robert Fisher,. R. Shepherd and Kent D. Hobert 9 acted as surgeon and assistant surgeons as the Caesarian section 10 surgery on Marian Denise Pounds on February 17, 1978; Nurses Ca verness 11 and Eugenia attended during the surgery; Nurse Hastings attended the 12 patient post-operatively in the ward; Drs. Wong, Barrow, Zalis, 13 Sheppard and Von Strieff attended the patient as members of the Code 14 Blue team. Claimants at thistime are unaware as to ,which_ of the, 15 foregoing named individuals were acting as agents and employees of 16 the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HOSPITAL or CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL , 17 SERVICES. 1g F. Amount Claimed: (1) General compensatory damages in 19 the amount of $1,000, 000.00. (2) Punitive damages in the amount of 20 $3, 000,000. 00. (3) Special damages not known at present. . 21 DATED: May 9, 1978. Z2 e. robert (bob) waliach & David B. Bau & 23 Richard D. Sanders, ' Esq. • 24 25 26 By DAVID B. BAUM 27 Attorneys for Claimants 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 nc 36 00685 e. robert (bob)wallach & David B,Baum CIVIL ADVOCATES TOWNHOUSE 43 IRON SHIP PLAZA SAN FRANCISCO 94111: (415)956-5544 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 7,g_ In the Matter of Increasing the Membership on the _ Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging. Supervisor E. H. Hasseltine having recommended that the membership on the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging be increased by one (from 35 to 36) to include the new West Pittsburg Local Committee; Supervisor Hasseltine having further recommended that Mr. Walter Seamans, 80 Delta Drive, West Pittsburg, California 94565 be appointed to the Contra Costa County Advisory' Council on Aging (representing the West Pittsburg Local Committee) for a term commencing July 5, 1978 and ending September 30, 1979; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of Supervisor Hasseltine are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the- minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc• Contra Costa County Advisor$upervisors Council on Aging 27th June 78 Director, human Resources affixed this day of 19 Agency County Administrator R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Information Officer Mr. Seamans By P Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl 0068] H-24 4/77 15m In the Boars! of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 7.&- In the Matter of Reappointment to the Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board. On the recommendation of Supervisor W. N. "Boggess,. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Ms. Roseanne Hogstrom is ~ REAPPOINTED to the Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Board (representing Supervisorial District IV) for a three-year term ending June 30, 1981. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct•copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the'Seal of the Board of CC: 11s. Hogstrom Su eWesors Contra Costa County Drug p 27th June 78 Abuse Board affixed this day of 19 Director, Haman Resources Agency i OLSSON, Clerk. County Administrator ' Public Information Officer ay3-1 Daputy Clerk onda Amdahl 00681 H-24417715m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19; In the Matter of Los Angeles Superior Court Class Action Lawsuit re Municipal Court Judges'- Salaries. Olson v. Cory No.- CA 00043 The Board having received a May 12, 1978 letter -from attorneys Richard Chernick and William Levit seeking this County 's written agreement that said letter, together with enclosures, shall constitute full compliance with any appli- cable claims requirements of this County IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the proposed agreements of Messrs. Chernick and Levit be returned unexecuted. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. w hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy-of an order.'entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid cc• Gibson, Dunn, Crutcher Witness my hand and the'-Seal of the Board of - Supervisors 27th June 78 County Counsel affixed this day of . 19 County Administrator R �LSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Anda-Amdahl 00688 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Authorizing Legal Defense IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County provide. legal defense for Harry D. Ramsay, Sheriff-Coroner, in connection with Superior Court Action.No. 187809 (Diablo Valley Gun Exchange, Plaintiff) reserving all rights of the: County in accordance with provisions of California Government .Code Sections 825 and 995. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on.the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my handand the Seal of the Board of cc: County Counsel Supervisor County Administrator affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 Sheriff-Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk M. Vannucchi 00689 H-24 4/77 15m �r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, , 1978 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Instruments It is by the Board ORDERED that the following `Instruments are ACCEPTED: INSTRUMENT DATE GRANTOR REFERENCE 1. Consent to Dedication Pacific Telephone- SUB. for Roadway Purposes 6/5/78 & Telegraph Company MS 226-76 2. Consent to Dedication East Bay Municipal SUB. for Roadway Purposes 1/10/78 Utility District , ., -5165_ 3. Grant Deed 6/3/78 Robert F. Mygrant, LUP et al._ 2001-75 . PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978- I hereby certify that the foregoing is c true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Department: PWD(LD) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor cc: Recorder (via P.W. ) affixed this 27thdoy of June , 1978 Public Works Director Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk 00gg H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, , 1978 to the Matter of Releasing Deposit for Subdivision MS 64-74, Walnut Creek Area. On April 12, 1977 this Board RESOLVED that improvements in- the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; afid now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for one year after. completion and acceptance; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Subdivision Agreement, it is by the Board ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Clifford B. Davis the $500.00 cash deposit as surety u=--tar the Subdivision- Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail Number 129301 dated September 17; 1975• PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Department: PWD (LD) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director - LD affixed this 27t&y of June 1918 Clifford B. Davis 1829 Mt Diablo Blvd. Walnut Creek, CA 94596 /� J. R. OLSSON. Clerk By� (/ . Deputy Clerk M, VANNUCCHi ooWL H-24 4177 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 1978 In the Mot:=r of Estimated Costs of Enterprise Fund Irplementation in County Medical Services The Board on June 1: , 1978, having referred to its Finance Committee (Supervisors Eric H. Hasseltine and Nancy C. Fanden) a final report from the Director, Human Resources Agency, and the County.Administrator on implementation plans for an Enterprise Fund in County Medical Services; and Said Committee having this day recommended the-following: In view of the impact of Proposition 13, defer for six months consideration of the estimated costs and offsets attributable to implemen- tation of an Enterprise Fund (see attached Table) with the following important exceptions: 1. After completion of County layoff actions, proceed with the transfer of 3 clerical positions from the Auditor-Controller to County I•0ical - - Services and authorize one additional temporary clerical position for CMS. (The 3 permanent positions will involve no net cost since both the positions and the incumbents will be transferred.) 2. Proceed to make available to CMS Business Office appropriate space for the Medi-Cal , Medicare, and Insurance billing units. The above actions are essential to provide CMS with the capability of assuming sorsa A/C :unctions agreed for transfer under EF and further with the billing/collectiors/follow-up capability necessary to maximize revenue under EF. CMS will endeavor to carry out the other management improvement actions under EF (Purchasing, Contracts, etc.) without additional staff pending consideration of these requests after a six-months period. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Finance . Cormi ttee is APPROVED.. , PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of.an order entwed on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Witness'my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ori g: Human Resources Agency cc: County Medical Director supervisors County Administrator offixed this 27th day of Jura 197-13— County 97County Auditor-Controller (� R. 0LSSON, Clerk Devuty CIerk / Ronda Amdahl ym ES11MA'ILD CUSTS ANO VOR LNILRVI(ISI. HIND 11,1111.LMLNTAT i ON ARRAS OF ESTIMATED COSTS ESTIMATED OFFSETS BENEFITS REMARKS MANAGEMENT CONCERN PERSONNEL I EQU1111,01' MANAGEMENT None in External funding} i, holno sout)ht to cover tho &A,it ic-i Ihr-ORMATION FY 1978-79 requirements study and Ri,P (Phase 2) . Phase 1 is Gt lt:'j SYSTEM, developed by Joint: TF. An improved data processinf3 s system is required irrespective of EF. 'BUDGET $273 1 Acct Clk CMS Bus Svcs will use These two persons are essential to support the partici_ $8,620 these two persons to pro- pative management concept (to include all cost cent::• Acct Elk vide review & analysis of managers) under EF. 1 ACCOUNTING SERVICES Acct $273 revenue & expense reports 4 HE Clks from A/C to 4 FTE Clks reduction in Consolidates all patient Transfers necessitated by transfer of functions. Fol lo, BILLING/COLLECTIONS/ CMS A/C staff contact and follow-up in up on OP claims is a now function not previously per- ELIGIBILITY SERVICES 4 FTE Collection Follow- I Production of at least CIMS formed in either CMS or A/C (Experience of San Joaqui,7 (Patient Liability) up Clks (Temp pending de- $300,000 in additional County in a similar application with smaller number of termination of Perm psns ) revenue in FY 78-79 billings resulted in $200,000 of additional revenue in first 4 months. PURCHASIIIG SERVICES 1 ITC Anticipated savings in Coordinated & controlled Material Mgmt Program will be installed without any i}l- $7,494 $1,400 smaller inventory & Material Management crease in CMS mgmt staff or A/C buyer staff; will be better inventory mgmt Program for CMS conducted on experimental basis for first 6 mos under IA 1 Contrs Sp $409 HRA C&G Unit, which is CMS considers it essential to management of EF to have: $17 ,490 presently overcommitted, full control of all CMS contracts . CONTRACTS 2 Ciks can reduce workload by $16,114 $4,571 est 150 CMS Contracts/yr 4 Custodial psns from PW 4 Custodial psn-reduction Transferred psns plus -now .t3UILDING to CMS in PIS staff psns requested will 2 Ground Mnt psns from enable CMS to clean to AND 2 Ground rant psn reduc- P1AI1ITE12t1NCE P14 to CMS tion in PW staff JCAH standards, which has SERVICES 3 neer Cust•psn's in CMS.. not been done in the past C $25,937• $ $4,258 2 Window Wash- psns-in CMS CZ 21 343 $809 ._ + LEGAL 1 Dep CC psn More continuous and 'Mgmt of EF requires full-time Health Care Attorney on SERVICES $26,000 $1,615 effective follow-up on large variety of legal matters involving collection, a 1 Clk all legal problems claims , changes in law & regulations. CMS requires $7,494 $1,400 capability- to-prioritize activities of counsel , I'ERSQNNEL 2 Pers Analysts in CS Mill enable CMS to coni Additional analysts are required in CS to provide C1.15 ► :� SERVICES $30,214 $600 troll numbers and class- with, essential personnel support & rapid processing Lilo ifications under CMS I under EF. --w $169,326 $15,608 * Includes fring benefiits 'i` TOTAL ** Plus other savings not CAC:gin IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COU?:T Y, STATE OF CF.LIFOP.UTA June 27 1978 Ill., THE MAITTER OF in--ti-a.? Procedures for an Enterprise 3u_Set _r. County -Medical se.:_Cas . The Board on June 1 , 1978, having referred to its Finance Coutes (S:.•_a=isors Zrnic F. Basseltine and lfancy C. Fanden) a final report frog the Dir=ecto?', Human Resources Agency, and the County Adsiaisirator on implementation plus for an Enterprise Fund in County 1Kczl Services; and Said Com i•ttee having this day reco=Umded the following initial prccayures for Enterprise Fund budget in County U•!edical Services which have been rutuZly agreed to by the County Ad-n nist_rator's Office, Human Resources Agency, Auditor-Controller, and County Hzdical Services= 1. Budget Preparation. Expenditure*and revenue budgets prepared by County I!edica_% Services shall be prepared and presented at the departaenta2' 1e7- e1 (budget unit) and not at the low organizational (cost center) level. The Auditor-Controller shall continue to "price out" permanent salaries and benefits; however, the permanent salaries vacancy factor, sra11 be an item of discussion bet-reen County Medical Services, Human Resources Agency, Auditor-Controller, and the County Administrator's Office_ County Pedircal Sex-rices shall prepare budget requests for ta=porary salaries and overtire _elated thereto [1013), overtime related to per.a_rent em-oloyees (1014) and hourly physicians salaries (1026), parrare_^_t physicians salaries (1017), and permanent physicians addi- tional duty pay (1018). County Medical. Services shall prepare budget re:-.Zests for -77 of er classific-ataons of expenditures [fornerly contained in :.he 2000 ac--ants (services and supplies) and tine 3000 accounts (special, sa-=ice assess-mars and negotiate`' daaages)), except where the Auditor- Cc::'--roller ray or_'de budget inp_t- for data processing services and s=•pplies, z_^d '!= services, and where Public Works may provide budget ±nvr for the use of cour•t3 equipment; and where the County rdsinfst:xrator rag provide budget input for insurance, including public 3iab==_ty, nee-cal ralpraetice, =lire and extended coverage, workers' co-perszt=on, zrd unewp?oyment: co=per sation. 2. P_Dpropr=,L,on Ad?--.,V=ents. County Medical Services shall have the auth ritg to`aajuwt ap0rop=iati0r5 Within t^- Major Expend=tu_re Classificatior_s (1000 accounts—Personnel and Benefitsj and among and between the Cali- fornia Health Facilities Commission (CHFC1 Major Expense Classifications— Professional Fees, Supplies, -%--Chased Services, and Other Direct Expense— wi thou_ the necessity of approval by the Board of Supervisors. 3. Reserve for Contingency_ The exvense budget shall contain a reserve for cont-^.9ency nor^.a1?y at about 2Z of the gross operating budget; exceptions rray be ride-where extenuating circam Lances zndicate'that such allowance v;na-?d ,rot be prudent. ' Any approp__ztion adjustment to the apprvpriatsd reserve for contingency shall requi,e approval of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. 4. Cavite! s'Qui pment. e. lijthin the EztPrprise Fund the foz.at of the capital equipment bcdget rust be the sacre as it currently is under the County line item budget-- i.e., each cauital equipment itea listed with a specific appzopr t_oz identified. However, a ruEscella._-e-crs line 2a`..err may be :r:c ceded. 0069 Item _.___-_-- -- _ -__-___$ Item--- - ---- ---- --- -- -- --__$ Item-- - -- -- ---- -- - -- ---- -------$ Its,-n--- ---- ----- --- - -- --- --- ---$ Miscellaneous.... .. . .. . . .... . .. b_- i^? ±?t_E'rD__S=' Fur:d C.Q ? fD� atllOxzd-t0 ti-JSP. t_�e `t_t_f d..3_ 'Z.. �...� ua to $2,500 without Board Of Supervisors apProval_ c. T e Ernterorise Fuad would be-ello✓ed to transfer funds among indivi– i dual ite_ms-,as long as no individual iter_..s, increased-3y`ross,-than $Z Q00.- A request t&- ,r ease e:z indi,r 4ual line i.terrr appropron by =ore than $1,000 will require -Board of Supervisors approval_ d_ The appropriation for the »scalleneous category luay not a-eceed 15 percent of the total appropriation for capital equipment- e. Individual items within the Miscellaneous category ray r_ot exceed $2,500- XT 1'S BY TEL BOARD ORD�,D that the recommendations of the Finance Cottee are ARPPOVED. P,-.SS---D BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. CERTIFIED COPY I certify'that this is a Pull, true & correct cop�-o[ the original document which is on file In my office,. and that It was passed & adopted by the Board.of- Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California, on -the date shown.ATTEST: J. P. OLSSON. County Clerk& z-officio Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, ZDe ty Ierk_ JUN 2 7 1978 en orig. 'Ftucan"Resources Agency cc: County Fedical Director county Ae—.inistrator County Auditorr- Controller Dr_ Degr:arz Dr_ Pollack Dr_ VOOd R. E. Jorn?i. Judy Ann M. l?er Chuck_ Ca:_ron _, ;I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 79 78 In the Matter of hent of an Enter rise Fund Co=sty Red i cal Services The Board on Ju^-e I ', I978, laving referred to its Finance Comruittea (5=�a-*-w-isors Fric H. Hass tine and 21ancy C. Fanden) a final report f in the Di;act-o_, Human Resources Agency, and the County Administrator on #zp2ementa-, t=on _v?ars for an Enterprise Fund .in County Medical Services; and Said Comittee having this day reco=ended the fo22owing_. Authorize the Director, Human Resources Agency, and the Medical Di_ecr-or, in coordination with the Auditor-controller, to establish an M_te-,r'f se Fu±d in County Medical Services effective July 2, 2978. IS BY THE BOARD ORD:RED that the recomeaendation of the Finance CC i a� is APPROVED_ PASSED BY TRE ZOARD on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and torr-c�t copy of an order entered on th& rninwes of said Boors of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Witn-ss my hared and the Sao) of the Board of 0==g_ Bamarz Resources Agency SuperYrsom cc_ Co=ty Medical Director affixed this 27tluoy of June 19 78 Cou:st4 Administrator Cornty auditor-Controller J. A. oLSS©N. Clerk gy Deputy Clerk -Ronda Amdahl 00690 �r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Pursuant to Section 21101(6) ) of the CVC, Declaring'a Stop Inter-Y-TRAFFIC RESOLUTION N0. . 2451 - S1P section on ARLINGTON BOULEVARD ) 2 7 197 (#1061B) and MCBRYDE AVENUE 0065AT Date: JUN Richmond Area. 1(SUpV. Dist. i Richmond ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT.: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance .Code : Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken.as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 21101 (6) of the California Vehicle Code,. the intersection of ARLINGTON BOULEVARD (Rd. #1061.B), and. . MCBRYDE AVENUE (Rd. #1065AT), Richmond, shall be declared a stop intersection and all vehicles traveling westerly on . MCBRYDE AVENUE and northerly on ARLINGTON BOULEVARD shall stop before entering or crossing said intersection. Adopted by the Board on__JUN 2 7 1978 Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 00697 �y r BOARD OF SWEVISORS, CDMA COSTA COM CAUFUMIA Re: Speed Limits on } TRAFFIC RESOLUTION,NO.'" 2450 -SPJ- MCBRYDE AVENUE } Date: JUN 27 1978 (Rd . #1065AT) , Richmond Area ) (Supv. Dist. 1 R i chmond ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of an engineering and traffic survey and recommendations thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant toCounty Ordinance Code Chapter 46-2 (§46-2.002 ff.), thi-s Board- hereby determines that the present speed limit(s) established on the below-described road; a street within the criteria of Vehicle Code Section 22358.3 , Ware) more than -reasonable and safe, and hereby determines and declares that the following speed i-imit(s) is(are). most appropriate, reasonable, and safe prima facie speed limit(s) there: • Pursuant to Section 22358.3 of the California Vehicle Code, , y no vehicle shall travel In excess of 15 miles per hour on that portion of- MCBRYOE AVENUE (Rd.#1065AT), Richmond, beginning at the intersection of Arlington Boulevard and extending easterly to its point of termination, a distance of 0.613 miles. JUN 2 7 1978 Adopted by the Board on_ _ t PASSED unanimously by.Supervisors present. cc:, Sheriff Cal ffornia Highway Patrol Qt1t'� + .G.,,.:1�,2.r*;',. "a•q.,�. . ..,l7§_lFrt,;��".-.'rv_;5%r�..ert.,:"':c'r'`ti i.� �;..,+v5ak'.-•..�"� �:ts^' ... --'c .. � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California _ June 97 19-.-n In the Matter of _. Reappointment of-,Alternates on the Economic Opportunity Council of Contra Costa County. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that ,the. following persons are REAPPOINTED as alternates for,certairi Supervisors !on ,the Economic Opportunity Council for fiscal year 1978-1979 : Dr. Orlyn Wood, County Health Officer (representing Supervisor J. P. Kenny) Mr. Robert Jornlin, County Welfare Director (representing Supervisor R. I. Schroder) Mr. Claude Van Marter, Director, Human Resources Agency . (representing Supervisor W. N. Boggess) PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. i J • I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: Supervisors and alternates Supervisors Economic Opportunity affixed this 27th doy of June 19 78 Council County Auditor=Controller County AdministratorR lSSON, Clerk Public Information Officer B Deputy Clerk Y Ronda Amdahl 0 }099 H-24 4177 15m IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA June 27 19 78 In the Matter of Contract Amendment for a Conceptual) Study of the U. S. Steel Resource ) Recovery Project ) W.O. S300-0927 ) The State Solid Waste Management Board having agreed to amend the existing forty-five thousand dollar ($45,000) contract with the County to provide an additional grant in the amount of thirty-eight thousand dollars ($38,000) for an expanded scope of work for the Phase II study to examine a range of project sizes with the following conditions: 1. The $10,000 received from both U. S. Steel and P.G. & E. ($20,000 total) are expended before any use is made of the $38,000 in this contract amendment; and 2. The Contractor shall engage in a good-faith effort to acquire $38,000 encumbered herein, and shall certify in , its interim report that it has been unable to acquire such alternate funding; and 3. The Executive Officer of the Solid Waste Management Board approves an interim report prepared after the expenditure of the original $4S,000 and the $20,000 from the private firms; and The County having received the letters of intent from both U. S. Steel and P.G. & E. indicating intent of each firm to contribute $10,000 for the purpose of expanding the scope of work for the Phase II study; and The County Solid Waste Commission having recommended at its June 21, 1978 meeting that the Board authorize the Public Works Director to execute the contract amendment and revise a Consulting Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, Walnut Creek, to conduct said study; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is hereby AUTHORIZED to execute a contract amendment for the County to accept an addition- al grant on thirty-eight thousand dollars ($38,0001 from the State Solid Waste Management Board for said study; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED, utilizing State grant monies and contributions from the U. S. Steel and P.G. & E. ($20,000 total) , to execute an Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers, Walnut Creek, for the purpose of conducting a study with regards to implementing the U. S. Steel Resource Recovery Project as an element of the County Solid Waste Management Plan, in the amount not to exceed one hundred and three thousand dollars ($103,000) . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors ORIGINATOR: Public Works Dept. affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 Env. Control J. R. OLSSON, Clerk cc: Public Works Director Environmental Control 141Deputy Clerk Business and Services SandraT. Nielson County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 00, 100 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMMT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date: June 27 , 1978 To: Board of Supervisors RECEIVED. Vernon L. Cline Frdm: Public Works Director JA cW 1978 Subject: Extra Business for 'Tuesda June 27, 1973 J. R. OLSSON ys CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i C NIRA OSTA CO. B "De u CONTRACT AMEPJDtiENT FOR A CONCEPTUAL STUDY OF THE U. S.* STEEL" RESOURCE RECOVERY PROJECT • V Item 1 A copy of the Phase I Report on the U. S. Steel* Resource"Recovery Project which was prepared in compliance with a Consulting Services Agreement between the County and Brown and Caldwell, is submitted to .the Board. Copies have been distributed to members of the Solid Waste Commission and the Advisory Pgnel for the U. S. Steel Resource Recovery- Project Study and•other interested entities. The report recommends that the scope•o£ worlclor Phase II of the study be expanded to examine projects larger than originally envisioned. The Agreement contained a provision for an expansion of scope of work should the Phase I study suggest feasibility of a larger project, provided however that additional funds are avail- able. The State Solid Waste Management Board (SSW?-1B) agreed to amend the existing 845,000 contract with the County to provide an additional $38,000 for completion of the expanded scope of work. This would enable examination of a range of larger . scale projects. However, 'the SS1171B has required the following conditions be placed in the Agreement before the $38,000 is granted for the study: 1. Each of the $10,000 anounts pledged from .U. S. Steel and P.G. l E. ($20,000 total) are expended before any use is made of the $38,000 in this contract amendment; 00701 EXTP.A BUSINESS Public Works Dept. Page 1 of 3 June 27, 1978 Microfilmed with board order r T F , Extra Business -2- June 25, 1978 2. The Contractor shall engage in a good-faith effort to acquire the $33,004 amount from sources other than those outlined above_ If unsuccessful, the Contractor shall certify in its interim report that it has been unable to acquire such alternative i i ' funding; and ! 3. The Executive Officer of the Solid ►Vaste Management-Board shall ; approve an interim report which shall be prepared following the. . expenditure of the original $45,000 and 'the -$20,000 from.the i . private firms_ It is noted that the County has already received letters from U.S. Steel and P.G.&E. indicating intent of each firm to contribute $10,000 towards this project. ' It is recommended th.ar: The Board acknowledge receipt of the Phase I report, The Public ;Yorks Director be authorized to: • Execute the contract amendment with the State to accept the.additional grant of thirty-eight thousand dollars ($.38,000) from the State Solid Waste Management Board; and • Execute a revised Agreement with Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers, Walnut Creek, for expanded scope. of work of the U.S. Steel Resource Recovery Project as an element of the County Solid Waste Management Plan. The, Agreement to contain a proviso that work is to proceed commensurate with available funds but not to exceed one hundred and three thousand dollars ($103,000)_ EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Dept. Page 2 of 3 00702 June 27, 1978 Extra Business -3- Jwie 26, 1975 NOTE: Z. The SSiJ?iB has requested the Agreement be, executed immediately, before the $38,000 amount is-returned to the State's General Fund. 2. _ The County SoZid Maste Corrmssion. recommended at its June 2l, i 1978 meeting that the Board authorize .the Public Morks Director .: to execute the contract amendment and to revise the Consuttinc " Services Agreement' with Brown and Caldwell, Malnut.Creek. (EC) 00703 Public Works Dept. EXTRA BUSITIESS Page 3 of 3 June 27, 1978 APPRI —O BY THE ❑ CONTRACTOR STANDi,RD AGREEMENT ATTO Y GENERAL ❑ STATE AGENCY .'ATE OF.CALIFORNIA STD. 2 (RtV. 11/75) 0 DEPT. OF GEN. SER. ' • 161117" ❑ CONTROLLER THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 19� ❑ in the State of California, by and between State of California, through its duif elected or appointed, ❑ qualified and acting ❑ TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE AGENCY NUMBER Amend. Executive Officer State Solid Waste Management Board Executive Officer State Solid Waste Management Board IS7-14-400�� hereafter called the State,and Contra Costa County hereafter called the Contractor. WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth service to be rendered by Contractor,amount to be paid Contractor,time for performance or completion,and attach plans and specifications,if any.) The State agrees to amend the existing $45,000 contract with Contra Costa County (Contractor) to provide for an expanded scope of work as shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. In return for this service the State shall pay the Contractor a sum of $38,000 in addition to the original contract upon satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. The $10,000 received from both U.S. Steel and PG&E ($20,000 total) are expended before any use is made of the $38,000 in this contract amendment; and 2. The Contractor shall engage in a good-faith effort to acquire $38,000 from other funding sources as an alternate to the $38,000 encumbered herein, and shall certify in its interim report that it has been unable to acquire such alternate funding; and 3. The Executive Officer of the Solid Waste Management Board approves an interim report prepared after the expenditure of the original $45,000 and the $20,000 from the private firms. Timing and report requirements are set forth in Exhibit B. Lpl- : :_D All terms and conditions not changed by this amendment or by either I hib 1gr5hihilt B remain as set forth in the original contract. The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement. �( IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the daterfie wr[en STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR AGENCY CONTRACTO IIF OTNEN THAN AN INDIVIDUA TATE C TI�YANTHENSNI . TC.tWaste Management Board Cont osta County1 UTHORIZE IG TURE) BY (A RIZED SIGNATU ` 000 TITLE TI Executive Officer UBLIC'WORKS DIRECT coADDRESS6th Floor AdministrationICONTINUED ON_SHEETS EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR) OILAMOUNT ENCUMBERED APPROPRIATION FUND Deportment of General Services Use ONLY S 38,000.00------ General UNENCUMBERED BALANCE ITEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YE R 7 F POV^_Y CII^^"T I OJ. IM CNCASINC CM CUM•AAMC[ FUNCTION D petim-nt cf Gen-rrl S rvices PP R O V E D 0J. DECNEAlING ENCUMNIIANCE LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT AUG I r' 78 hereby certify upon my own personal knowledge that budgeted fund T.B.A. NO. B.R. NO. ,,y re available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stored above v IGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER ( DATE BY n 1 hereby certify that all conditions fo tion set forth in State Administrative.Manual Sect.• i:rrs A:s't.C!*,ef Counrcl have been complied with and this document is exempt from review by the Department of Fine:)-1% SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE AGENCY DATE ► ox s-41% 1. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work,services,materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Contractor in the performance of this contract. � 2 The Contractor, and the agents and employees of'Contractor, in the performance of this agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of State of California. 3. The State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the.time and in the manner herein provided. In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the work in any manner deemed proper by the State. The cost to the State shall be deducted from i any sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid the Contractor upon demand 4. Without the written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor either in whole or in part. 5. Time is the essence of this agreement 6. No alteration or variation of the terms of this contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 7. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of Contractor's expenses incurred in the.performance hereof, including travel and per diem, unless otherwise expressly so provided. - 1 00'705 EXHIBIT A PHASE 2 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for Phase 2, as written in the original contract, provided only for a detailed study of a minimum-scale project, i.e., one providing an output of 120,000 lb/hr of steam. At the onset of work, it was understood that should the Phase 1 study suggest a larger scale project is feasible the scope of Phase 2 would be expanded to permit a detailed study of a range of project sizes. As indicated in Chapter 4 of the Phase 1 study report, a wide range of project sizes (from 770 TPD to more than 19,000 TPD of solid waste) appears to be feasible. Therefore, it is appropriate to expand the scope of work for Phase 2. This revised scope will allow consideration of a large power plant supplying steam and electricity to U.S. Steel and surplus energy for sale. Alternatively, this project could provide only part or all of the energy requirement of the U.S. Steel plant. Phase 2 - Feasibility Study is amended as follows Task 1. Define Energy Demand at U.S. Steel The existing and projected steam and electrical requirements of the U.S. Steel Pittsburg plant will be determined from an examination of company records and discussion with company personnel. Average, maximum and minimum demands will be determined, and daily load curves for process steam and electrical power load demands will be developed. Task 2. Establish Project Size and Desired Energy Form A suitable range of project sizes and desired forms of energy output, such as steam and/or electricity, will be established by discussions with U.S. Steel, PG&E, Contra Costa County and involved regulatory agencies. Task 3. Determine Solid Waste Characteristics Using information available from the State Solid Waste Management Board, Contra Costa County, solid waste management plans, refuse surveys and others, available solid waste in the study area will be characterized by the percentages of its various constituents, moisture content, and heat value of the combustible fraction. Task 4. Incorporate Market Surveys for Materials and Energy Products Applicable State Solid Waste Management Board market study information will be incorporated into the report. Discussions will be held with PG&E to establish prices the utility will pay for firm and as-available energy which may be generated at the U.S. Steel plant. Co-generation rate structures will be obtained from PG&E and interpreted for the proposed facility at Pittsburg if these Fates are available at the time of study. If not, policies governing establishment and escalation of such rates will be obtained and documented. 00'706 • Exhibit A _ Page 2 Task 5. Develop a Basis for Cost Estimating A basis for estimating capital and operating costs and projected revenues will be developed. Owners costs will be included. Task 6. Prepare Preliminary Design of Alternative Projects A minimum of four technologies will be investigated as appropriate for each size plant considered, including: (a) pyrolysis in multiple-hearth furnaces, (b) the Andco-Torrax process, (c) RDF direct combustion, and (d) mass burning. Each project, consisting of a material recovery plant (where applicable) and energy conversion facilities,- will be developed in sufficient detail. to permit cost estimating valid for planning purposes. Based on the defined project sizes developed under Task. 2 and solid waste characteristics determined in Task 3, estimated solid waste requirements for each energy recovery technology investigated under Task 6 will be determined. Task 7. Select Solid Waste Hauling Mode Remote processing of solid waste and hauling refuse-derived fuel will be compared against hauling all solid waste for the project to a centralized material recovery plant in Pittsburg. The most cost-effective and appropriate operating mode will be used in the subsequent analysis of energy recovery technologies in Task 6. Task 8. Develop Solid Waste Transport Costs for Each Energy Conversion Svstem Using solid waste quantities developed under Task 4 and transportation data developed in Phase 1, solid waste transport costs will be developed for each energy recovery techology Investigated under Task 6. In establishing specific solid waste sources within the county area, availablility factors will be assigned to all counties or separate waste streams within counties as appropriate . Waste sources selected will then be the most mailable at the least distance. Transportation and disposal costs also be developed for residue r,.esulting from material and energy recovery operations. Off 107 • _ 5-3 Barging will be considered along with truck transport since barging may be an environmentally more preferable transport mode. Task 9. Compare Alternative Projects All sizes and types of projects identified. in Task 6 will be compared on the basis of capital cost, operating costs , regulatory factors, and environmental considerations such as meeting air pollution and groundwater quality. regulations. Appropriate credits will be applied for sale of energy and materials , and appropriate costs will be applied for solid waste and residue transport and residue disposal. Task 10. Perform Initial Screening On the basis of the project comparison (Task 9) , those projects which are obviously not suitable, either from the standpoint of cost or environmental factors, will be eliminated. We expect one to three projects will be further analyzed as described below. Task 11. Identify Financing Alternatives Financing of the project can be by public, private or a combination of funds. Each alternative will be investigated and examined as it relates to the alternative projects. Applicable Solid Management Board studies will be incorporated. Task 12. Identify Institutional Alternatives A full range of institutional plans will be examined to determine which plan offers the most advantages. Plans included for study will range from full private to full public ownership, construction and operation. Applicable Solid Waste Management Board studies will be incorporated. Task 13. Select Recommended Project The best apparent size and type of project will be recommended. It will be composed of the least costly and most feasible, and most environmentally acceptable process, the best financing alternative and the best institutional alternative. .. -ask 14. Submit Air Pollution Data Details of the recommended project will be submitted to the SAAPCD, ARB and the EPA for a preliminary assessment of whether the project will be exempt from the offset requirements of the New Source Review Rules. Task 15. Lav Out Recommended Project The recommended project will be described in sufficient ..tail to permit an appreciation of all processes and physical a rangement. The presentation will include but not be limited to: 00708 5-4 (a) Design criteria and data (b) Description of major equipment items (c) Schematic process diagram(s) (d) Heat and mass balance(s ) 1 (e) Site plan (f) Preliminary facility drawings Task 16. Make Recommendations for Ongoing Work Recommendations will be prepared for further work such as pilot testing or refuse sampling and analysis if such is felt necessary to more precisely define project requirements prior' to commencement of detailed design. Task 17. Review Phase 2 Project with Advisory Committee Two advisory committee meetings will be held; one at 10 percent and a second meeting at 75 percent completion of Phase 2 work. Both meetings will be attended by the Project Manager who will - review the progress of the work. Task 18. Prepare Final Report A final report, presenting the results , conclusions and recommendations of both the Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies will be prepared. The report will be reproduced by offset printing and will be submitted in 50 copies. The camera-ready originals will also be delivered to the county for transmittal to the State Solid Waste Management Board. Task 19. Project Management 00" no EXHIBIT B Part 1 of Phase 2 This part of the project shall consist of the amount of work that can be performed within the remaining project funds, amounting to approximately $24,000. Brown and Caldwell is therefore authorized to proceed with this part until this amount of money.is expended. It is anticipated that the $24,000 will be expended at the conclusion of Task 6 of the new scope of work. • Part 2 of Phase 2 This part of the project shall encompass Tasks 7 through 10 and portions of Tasks 17, 18 and 19. • The U.S. Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel) and the Pacific Gas & Electric Company (P.G.& E. ) have indicated their willingness to contribute $20,000 ($10,000 from each company) to support this work. When these funds are received from U.S. Steel and P.G.&E., the County will authorize this part of the work to proceed. Fart 3 of Phase 2 This part of the project shall consist of the remaining tasks under the new scope of work. Funds for completion of this part (estimated to be $38,000), will be requested from the State of California. Executive Officer approval of a draft interim report completed at the end of Part 2 of Phase 2 (see below) would be required prior to expenditure of the $38,000. Timing and Reports All the work under Part 1 of Phase 2 is expected to be completed within three months from the date of the letter of authorization to proceed provided to Brown and Caldwell by the County. After funds are received by the County from U.S. Steel and P.G.&E., an . additional three months will be granted to complete— Part 2 of Phase 2. Included in this work, ten copies of an interim report is required to be issued by Brown and Caldwell covering Phase 1 and 2. This interim report shall ultimately be incorporated with the Phase 1 interim report into a final project report. At the completion of Part 3 a draft final repo t will be prepared by Brown and Caldwell and submitted to the Exe6utive Officer of the Solid Waste Management Board. The draft final report shall be submitted within four months of the date of the letter of authorization to proceed with Part 3 of Phase 2 provided by the County to Brown and Caldwell. Within one month of receiving comments on the draft final report, a final report including one camera ready copy and ten additional copies shall be submitted to the Solid Waste Management Board Executive Officer. 001710 _ -8- David lam, Citizen, and Jean Siri, Citizen, questioned whether there was enough waste available to support this and other current projects in the area. Board Members Parkinson and George felt the request should be denied and that the project proponents should proceed to complete the project as originally designed_ Board Member Parkinson pointed out that U.S. Steel had previously stated that it would not request additional state funds for this project '�",'" -� :ie�"V+•:• a.fit` 'Zl,::^irk �:- T'-:ss :m .+ ..-�.' `{�: "r.�;...,1 _ :,.5? ,-. It was moved by Board Member Martinez; seconded by Board Member Alvin: see below THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE COMMITTEE AND ALLOCATE THE $38,000 AND REVISE THE SCOPE OF WORK TO THE NEW DIRECTION The vote was: Alvin-YES; George-NOE; Martinez-YES; Moscone-YES; Parkinson-NOE; Shirvanian-YES. The motion carried. �e;C .'� �R:� �tij,-.�� ``�iiC�tel 1�,����r��f'�i�Y��� ��� f��y .sem fir• .ue�;.' meeting to submit their final report on marketing update for the Board's acceptance. The Board briefly discussed the procedures that should be followed for acceptance of reports required under contracts issued by the Board. it was moved by Board Member Martinez; seconded by Board Member Shirvanian and UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORT AS COMPLETION OF THE CONTRACT BOARD COMMITTEE REPORTS Information and Education Committee - Board Member Parkinson The committee presented the Board a draft of the policy to be followed under SB 650 information activities. . The Public Information Officer is letting several contracts for which money was allocated at the last meeting, and the $20,000 allocated for television spots is going out for RFP. The committee is proceeding with development of a full-scale public information program. STAFF ACTIVITIES REPORTS The staff has prepared a list of permits which have been approved as of May 30, 1978. The list was prepared at the request of the Board at their last meeting. The Board requested a full report, including the effect Proposition 13 is having on the permit process, at the next Board Meeting. Board Member George left at this point. BE IT RESOLVED that the Executive Officer or his designee is authorized to negotiate and execute a contractual agreement not to exceed $38,000 to amend contract number S7-14-100 for an expanded scope of work as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. � V� John W. Hagerty ,Depu y Executive Offilr 00"il 1 In the Board` of Supervisors of : Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, , 1978 In the Maher of Waiving Park Dedication Fee for Subdivision MS 177-72 Alamo Area. It is by the Board ORDERED that the $90.00 Park •Dedication Fee for Subdivision MS 177-72 is not collectable and the Public Works Department is discharged from accountability for its collection .in accordance with Government Code 25257 PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of ah order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originating Department: PWD (LD) Wdness my hand and tfie Seal of the Board of Supervisors- cc: Public Works Director - LD affixed this 27thday of_ June. 19 78 Auditor-Controller Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy clerk. Sandra L: Nie! on 00"1412 H-24 4/7715m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Tune 97 ' 19 -7-g t In the Matter of Appointment to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Vine Hill area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. The Board on June 13, 1978 having appointed Mr.--William A. Valli to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Mountain-`View-area)-' of• the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee; and Supervisor N. C. Fanden having advised that Mr. Valli does not reside within the Mountain View area and having recommended that his name be removed from the aforesaid Committee and that he _ be appointed to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Vine Hill area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee; . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation -of Supervisor Fanden is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. s i I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of cm order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. Valli Supervisors 1058 Marie Avenue 27th June 78 Martinez 94553 affixed this day of 19 Director of Planning County Auditor-Controller R. OISSON, Cleric County Administrator �i Public Information Officer BY � Deputy Uerk Ronda Amdahl 00713 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of - Contra Costa County, Statel of. California' June 27 . 19 _Zg In the Matter of Bids for Remodel for Family Practice Clinic, Martinez. (4419-4280) The Public Works Director having received bids on May 25, 1978 for construction of the Remodel for Family Practice Clinic at the Contra Costa County Hospital, 2500 Alhambra Ave., Martinez, and having found all bids beyond available funds; and The Public Works Director having this day recommended that all bids be rejected and that he be instructed to make recommendation for further 'acti'on when funds are available, The Board APPROVES the recommendations of the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Bldg. & Grounds Supervisors affixed this_2Z day of Jame -. 19_U- cc: Public Works Dept. Architectural Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Agenda Clerk Accounting Section Sy Deputy Clerk County Administrator t SSRdtB 12 011 County Auditor Contractor County Hospital 00714 H-24 4/77 15m c, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County,_ State of California June 27 , 1978 In the Matter of Readopting Ordinance No. 78-43. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Ordinance No. 78-43, adopted as an urgency measure on June 16, 197$ (providing:for an increase in Health Department fees) is hereby READOPTED this 27th day of June, 1978, reading thereof having been waived by unanimous vote of the Board. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. s i I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of gn order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Counsel Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 27thday of jun;- 79-M J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ,l A Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufeld H-24 4n7 15m 00 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 -----,, 19 78 In the Matter of Readopting Ordinance No. 78-44. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Ordinance No. 78-44, adopted as an urgency measure on June 16, 1978 (permitting fees . to be set by resolution) is hereby READOPTED this 27th day of June, 1978, reading thereof having been waived by unanimous vote of the Board. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of c&n order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Counsel Witness my Itzand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 27th day of June 19= J. R. OLSSON, Clerk LDeputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufe Q �. H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 78 In the Matter of Introduction and Adoption cf Ordinance No. 78-45 . Ordinance No. 78-45 (an urgency ordinance which becomes effective immediately) ,c-a=ect Lng er-ror's�'in-!Urgerncy Ordinance No b=43 ;pertainin t certain pulilicwhealtfi"permit fees, having been introduced this day, and the Board by unanimous vote having waived reading of same; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid ordinance is ADOPTED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish same in the BRENTWOOD NEWS for the time and in the manner required by law. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27t day of .T11nP 19_ 8 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Ro bie Gu rrez 00 ., l � H -24 4/77 15m ORDINANCE NO. 78-45 (Public Health Permit Fees) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows (omitting the parenthetical footnotes from the official text of the enacted or amended provisions of the County Ordinance Code) : SECTION I: The following section of Title 4, Division 420 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code is repealed and reenacted to read: 420-6.022 Fees. (a) The following non-refundable fees shall be paid to the Health Officer at the time of filing for or request- ing an investigation, test, inspection or permit required by this chapter. No fees are required when the Health Officer receives from the subdivider a written statement by a district or city governing body indicating that sewers and a sewage treatment plant are available and adequate to handle the additional volume:of sewage from the proposed subdivision. (b) Subdivisions. The fees for a subdivision proposing to use individual sewage disposal systems are: (1) Subdivision - Site evaluation 2-4 lots, per lot. . . ..... .. . .. . . . .. . . . . .$ 50.00 5 or more lots, maximum. .. .. . . . .. . .: . . . .. .$ 250.00 (2) Percolation tests, per lot or building Site tested, as required.. . . . . .. . . .. . . .$ 100.00 (3) Appeal (except hearings called pursuant to Section 420-6.026) .. .. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 100.00 (c) Individual Systems. The fees related to individual sewage disposal systems are: (1) Site evaluation.. .. .. .. . . .. .. ... . . . . . . . . . .$ 40.00 (2) Percolation test. . .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .$ 100.00 Each additional test. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .$ 100.00 (3) Permit (except minor rebuilding) . .. . . . . . . .$ 60.00 (4) Review of existing individual system.. . . . .$ 40.00 (5) Investigate abandonment or sealing of septic tank.... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .$ 25.00 (6) Reinspection. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .$ 25.00 (7) Appeal (except hearings called pursuant- to Section 420-6.026) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .$ 100.00 (8) Advice, consultation, minor- repair permit.NO FEE (d) Penalties. Any person violating this Chapter or regula- tions issued hereunder, by failing to submit plans, obtain necessary inspections and approvals, or pay fees, or by commencing or continuing construction or remodeling in violation hereof, shall pay triple the appropriate fee as a penalty and remain subject to other applicable penalties and enforcement procedures authorized by the state law and/or this Code. (Ords. 78-45 , 78-43 § 2:* § 420-6.022 (d) : Ords. 71-100, 1468: prior code § 4651: Ords. 1440 § II, 640 § IV.) SECTION II: The following section is added to Title 4, Div. 414 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code to read: -1- 00718 -2- 414-4.816 Fees. (a) The following non-refundable fees shall be paid to the Health Officer at the time of filing for or request- ing an investigation, test, inspection or permit required by this Chapter. No fees are required when the Health Officer receives from the subdivider a written statement by a district or city governing body indicating that an approved domestic water supply is available and adequate to handle the additional volume of water required for the proposed subdivision. (b) Subdivision. The fees for a subdivision proposing to use wells are: Subdivision--Site evaluation 2-4 lots, per lot. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 25.00 5 or more lots,maximum. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 150.00 (c) Well. The fees for an individual lot proposing to use a well are: (1) Well application and site evaluation investigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 40.00 (2) For layout, permit and inspections of a well. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 60.00 (3) For review of an existing well. . . . . �. . . . .$. 40.00 C4) For inspection of abandoning or sealing of a well. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 25:00 (5) For each reinspection. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 25.00 (6) For advice on repairs. . . . . .. . . . . . . .NO FEE (d) Penalties. Any person violating this Chapter or regulations issued hereunder, by failing to submit plans, obtain necessary inspections and approvals, or pay fees, or by commencing or con- tinuing construction or remodeling in violation hereof, shall pay triple the appropriate fee as a penalty and remain subject to other applicable penalties and enforcement procedures authorized by the state law and/or this Code. (Ords. 78-45 , 78-43 '9 3: 420-6.022 (d) : Ords. 73-100, 1468: prior code § 4651: Ords. 1440 § II, 640 § IV) . SE'CTMIN III. URGENCY. This ordinance is for the immediate preser- vation of the public peace, health, .and safety within the meaning of Government Code Section 25123 and Elections Code Section 3751, because it will allow prompt increases in fees charged for various county services so that (beginning with the next quarter fee-year) such services can become more self-supporting, relying less on the general , property tax, which tax is now severely limited' by the enactment of Article XIIIa of the California Constitution by the voters as Proposition 13 (the "Jarvis--Gann Initiative") on the June 6, 1978 election, such services being necessary to the preservation of the public peace, health, and safety. SECTION IV. IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. & 7-1-78 OPERATIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective immediately on passage but becomes operative on July 1, 1978 (the beginning of the next quarter fee-year) , and within 15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it in the BRENTWOOD NEWS a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on June 27. 1978 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors - J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, W. N. Boggess, E. H. Hasseltine, R. I. Schroder. NOES: Supervisors - None. ABSENT: Supervisors - Nene. ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk & ex officio Clerk- of the Board Agbart I. Schroder ha' - of the Board By Dep. Robb i utierr 00 ORDINANCE NO. 78/ 45 (2 of 2) In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 0, 19 78 In the Matter of - Approval of Office on Aging Contract for Older Americans Act Title III Funds IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #20-199 with the City of Antioch to provide $5,170 in Office on Aging Title III Older Americans Act funds as a financial supplement for equipment purchase for the City of Antioch Senior Drop-In Center effective 3/1/78 to 6/30/78. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true ono correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 County Auditor-Controller County Welfare Director J. R. OLSSON, Cleric Office on Aging // / Contractor By cn/�irjrc! Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson gm VV X20 H-24 4/77 15m r (City tic S._liuul Di:.rrict) RL•'SOLVED, that _ __ City of AnIdoch _ (name of City or School District:) a Public Agency duly constituted and existing under the laws of the State of Ca.litornia, appruvus ALruetneuL D20-199 with the County of Contra Costa for the tersn trout March 1 1914 through June 30___.__, 1978, for ._.___Antioch Senior Citizens' Center - Title III Supplement (subject of Agreement) and that ^ Stephen R. Thatcher_ Cid Manager (name of authorized official) (official capacity/title) of City of_ "iD_Q] is authorized and directed to (name ,of City of School District) sign said Agreement on behalf of this public agency and to execute any bonds or other documents required in connection therewith. CEItTmcA'rE OF CITY CLERIC OR SECRETARY I, _ Dorothy P. Marks do hereby (name of City Clerk or Secretary of School Board) certify that I am the duly elected, qualified and acting City Clerk (C:Lty Clerk or Secretary) of City of Antioch , that the foregoing (name of City or School District) is a full, true, and correct copy of'a resolution duly adopted by the City Council _ of said Public Agency on _ February 14 19J� (City Council or School Board)- and that said resolution is now in full force and effect. I declare under penalty of perjury . that the matters See forth in the foregoing certificate are true and correct. Executed at Antioch _ _ , Culifornia, on June 15 1978, (city) JI (C.It)• Gler'.':: t'~:%. . r.•t.tt)''.. .ci;;tt.tCttC.•) 00X21 Microfilmed with board order j 1, Contra Costa County Standard Form STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 20 - 199 1. Contract Identification. Number Department: Social Service (Area Office on Aging) Subject: Antioch Senior Citizens' Center--Title III Supplement 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: CITY OF ANTIOCH Capacity: Public Agency Address: P.O. Box 130, Antioch, California 94509 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is March 1, 1978 and it terminates June 30, 1978 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment .Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 5,170 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described' in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Area Agency on Aging Project Plan and Budget for FY 1977-78. 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: 42 USC §3021 et seq.; 45 CFR §903.0 et seq.; and California Government Code 53703. 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF ORAXA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR B J R. I.Schroder By Y Chairman, Board of Supervisors ,, enager phen R. Tha cher City M (Designate offa.cial capacity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) State of California ) By County of Contra Costa ) ss. amle L. JoHnson Deputy ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor ' Recommended by Dep rtment known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By. ` _it'— 'fZ they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Form Approved: County Counsel Dated: June 15, 1978 FOR if APPROVED By, hfRn t'GnL-:,L:.A.7linlstralOr , Deputy Notary Publ' /Deputy County Clerk Dorothy P. Marks- tl d�►�2� (A-4617 REV 6/76) - .ir'..'... .:..__ �... ■ W \r ■Wlwt rWl W��II .WIIr .. � � � Contra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) 20 - 199 Number 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to the Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will pay Contractor: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [x] c. An amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] [%] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular FMC 74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost), and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or [ ] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allowable costs. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 2. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in, which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the;head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. tl, 00't23 (A-4618 REV 6/76) -1- ..,. rc r Contra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed.the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the 'Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. - �►�X24 (A-4618 RED 6/76) -2- - SERVICE PLAN Number 20 - 199 •�� Contractor operates the Antioch Senior Citizens Drop-in Center located at 2nd and E Streets in Antioch for Antioch area residents. Under the terms of this Contract, Contractor will purchase and install equipment for the Center and provide a Senior Activities Program at the Center. Contractor will provide service in accordance with the following specifications: 1. Administration of Services. Contractor will hire a part-time Recreation Activity Coordinator who will: a. Plan, promote, develop, coordinate and supervise a community-wide program of recreational activities for older adults; b. Serve as an advisor to the senior executive board and organization, and as a liaison between the Senior Program and the local Committee on Aging; c. Assist in planning, publicity, and overall organization of programs and services; and d. Supervise the publication and distribution of the Center's bulletin. 2. Equipment. Contractor will purchase and install equipment for the Center as specified in the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures included in this Service Plan. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES Federal Share Local Share County (Contractor Personnel Staff $ -0- $ -0- Fringe Benefits -0- -0- Travel -0- -0- Building Space -0- -0- Communications and Utilities 200 -0- Printing and Supplies 600 -0- Equipment Table & Chair, carriers $ 700 Physical fitness floor mats (15) 1,000 Bulletin Board (raw material) 98 Utility Ladder (12' , wood) 100 Banquet Tables (20) 1,200 Folding Chairs (150) 500 $3,598 3,025 $ 573 Other Door Stops (hydraulic) 60 -0- Shades for front door 75 -0- Shelving for arts & crafts; conference room 1,200 -0- Total Cost $ 5,160 $ Less Income ( -0-) Net Costs (Payment Limit) $ 5,160 Initials: Contrafor County Dept. QU��� SPECIAL CONDITIONS Number - 1. State of California Office on Aging "Manual of Policies and Procedures," February 1975, will prevail in setting fiscal guidelines, including standards for allowable costs. As specified in the Payment Provisions, payment for services is subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures." 2. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures. Specific line-item budget amounts may vary, and appropriate line-item budget categories may be added, but only with prior written authorization from the Director of the County Office on Aging. All budget changes are subject to the Contract Payment Limit. All Local Share expenditures are the responsibility of Contractor unless otherwise specified. 3. Cost Report and Settlement, Paragraph 6. of the Payment Provisions, is modified to require such final report within 45 days of Contract's termination, at which time Contractor shall submit an audit pursuant to the services provided here- under, according to specifications required by the County Office on Aging. 4. Contractor will submit a written inventory to County at the termination of this Contract, accounting for each item of equipment included in the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures, or any amendments thereto, which cost $100 or more (including costs of acquisition, freight, taxes, and installation), has a useful life of more than one year, and was purchased with Title III OlderAmericansAct funds included in said budget. Initials 4rda for County Dept. OU 12 r _� psi= dr9;W� � ` Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with .respect to its-performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make availableforinspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the- County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree, to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits,are complete and exceptions resolvedforthe funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be-required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these-records- available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This. Contract may be terminated by either party, at .their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice .to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed .with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as -expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended .by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 40'1'27 (,N-4616` REV 6/76)) _l- Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL COL:JITIONS 4 (Purchase of -Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to.final determination in writing by the headof` the''County Department.for which':-this Contract is made-or his designee or in accordance with the applicable'procedures (if-'any)�' required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be- governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the' State of California:' b. Any action relating to-this Contract •shall.be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations'. ' Should,Federal or-State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall-be amended`to assure conformance with=such Federal or State requirements. ; 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph''9.''(Disputes)-'of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or'sratements by any officer, agent or employee -of the 'Couiit indicating the Contractor's y g performance or any' part thereof complies with the requirements 'of this 'Contract, 'or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; riot shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any'of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract*and.'shall-notassign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the 'prior written consent of the ' County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State`or' Federal'°approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shal- not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. - Contractor ^-omises and attests that `the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or'potential` conflicts 'of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes 'in'`such-governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to 'require-its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of-:persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that. a. All applications and recordsconcerningany individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees,,agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616 -2- n VO Centra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide: the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. 23. Possessory Interest. If this Contract results in the Contractor having possession of, claim to or right to the possession of land or improvements, but does not vest ownership of the land or improvements in the same person, or if this Contract results in the placement of taxable improvements on tax exempt land (Revenue & Taxation Code §107), such interest or improvements may represent a possessory interest subject to property tax, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Contractor agrees that this provision complies with the notice requirements of Revenue & Taxation Code §107.6, and waives all rights to further notice or to damages under that or any comparable statute. Y.DU.' 29 (A-4616 REV 2/78) -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 78 In the Matter of ` Report of County Planning Commission on Amendment to the County General Plan for the West Pittsburg Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the County Planning Commission recommends -approval of an amendment to the County General Plan for the West'Pittsburg area (Shell Chemical Property) ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, July 25, 1978 at 1:30 p.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required__ by law. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Names Provided by Planning Supervisors affixed this27th doy of Tttne 19 78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk bbie Wtierrez . ffll H-24 4/77 15m O V 730 RECEIVE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J Ufa 197 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. R. OiSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ONT�O�TA CO. -.JL I CO....Deoury TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: June 16, 1978 Contra Costa County - FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment & Envir Director of Planni onmental Impact Report, SHELL CHEMICAL PROPERTY, West Pittsburg - (S.D. V) Attached is Planning Com sion solution No. 46-1978, adopted by the County - Planning Commission on Tu da3, une 13, 1978, by unanimous vote of the• Commiss"iorr (all Members Present). - This general plan amendment and environmental impact report was reviewed.by the County Planning Commission on April 25, May 23, and June 6, 1978. The environmental impact report was accepted by the County Planning Commission as being adequate and in conformance with CEQA, State and local guidelines and the general plan amendment were both approved by the Commission on Tuesday, June 6, 1978, by unanimous vote with all members being present. This amendment would change the land use designation of approximately 155 acres from Heavy Industry (H-I) to Retail Shopping and Multiple Family Residential and would also indicate a nei . hood park in the residential area. The property is located at the northeasterly corner of the intersection of Port Chicago Highway and Billow Pass Road in the West Pittsburg area. The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Mr. Alfred A. Affinito (Applicant) Bay Area Rapid Transit District 538 Affinito Lane . 800 Madison Street Pittsburg, California 94565 Oakland, California 94607 Interlake Steel , Inc. ATTN: Mr. Howard L. Goode 761 Port Chicago Highway Manager, Planning Programs Pittsburg, California 94565 ATTN: Nello J. Bianco, Vice Pres. Attn: Richard Walker, Plant Manager (See attached sheet for additional names and addresses) AAD/v cc: Shell Chemical General Plan Amendment file Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. Attachements: Resolution, E.I.R., Area Map, Staff Reports, Minutes 00"31 Shell Chemical Property General Plan Amendment (Afred Affinito) — Page #2 Mr. Dennis Gremer Interlake Steel , Inc. 150 Riverside Drive West Pittsburg, Calif. 94565 " C. Emes 3391 Willow Pass Road Pittsburg, California Mr. Ralph E. Downing 3001 Delta Fair Boulevard Antioch, California 94509 Theodore B. Lichti 68 Bay View Avenue Pittsburg, California William R. Stead, Manager, Real Estate Interlake Steel , Inc. 2015 Spring Road Oak Brook, Illinois 60521 Shell Chemical Company Post Office Box 711 Martinez, California 94553 Attn: Mr. M-. S. Waller City of Antioch Post Office Box 130 Antioch, California 94509 City of Pittsburg ' 2020 Railroad Avenue Pittsburg, Calif. 94565 Attn: Jean Abraham, Director Community Development 00 1'32 Resolution No. 46-1978 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALI- FORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE SHELL PROPERTY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, AN AMENDMENT TO THE COUNTY LAND USE AND RECREATION ELEMENTS OF THE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN. WHEREAS, a request was made to amend the land use element of the County General Plan for 155 acres at the northeast corner of Port Chicago Highway and Willow Pass Road; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared, posted and distributed for comments and transmitted to the Planning Commission on April--5, 1978, and there- after made available to those interested; and r WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, the Planning.Commiss= ion conducted public hearings on the Environmental Impact Report (ETR) on April 25, 1978 and May 23, 1978 and closed the hearing on the EIR on May 23, 1978, and conducted public hearings on the amendment on April 25, 1978, May 23, 197a and June 6, 1978, and closed the hearing on the amendment on June 6, 1978; and WHEREAS, the Shell Property General Plan Amendment changes the land use designation of the site from Heavy Industry to Multiple Family Residential-Low Den- sity and Retail Shopping and denotes a Neighborhood Park symbol on the parksite; and WHEREAS, staff recommends APPROVAL of the General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission having fully considered and evaluated all testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, recommends to the County Board of Supervisors APPROVAL of the Shell Property General Plan Amendment, including both text and map as attached hereto as Exhibit A, incorporating the staff recommendations with amend- ments to the text which state that the use of the site for residential- and commer- cial uses shall not preclude the use of any portion of the site for a future BART rail extension and station, and that the location of the commercial designation on the land use map is flexible to accommodate future BART requirements and that an alternative is a phasing pian which will allow development to begin while leaving additional time for including BART pians; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Planning Commission having reviewed the comments submitted in response to the EIR and studied the written replies to 00 M Resolution No. 46-1978 the comments, finds that the environmental documents constituting the Final Environ- mental Impact Report are adequate and provide an environmental analysis suitable for decision making on the project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to its responsbiilities as a hearing body for County projects, the County Planning Commission certifies to the Board of Supervisors that it finds the EIR to be adequate and that it has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act with State guidelines and County processing procedure; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Planning Commission concurs with-the findings of the Environmental Impact Report that the Shell Property General Plan Amendment wouldhave certain environmental effects but finds the project justified ' for the following reasons: The General Plan Amendment offers the opportunity for development.of moderate income housing and a mix of housing types and a community size shopping center which are needed in the community; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Planning Commission finds that the following significant impact-s-_t^ would result from implementation of the project and adopts tine associated mitigation measures to minimize those impacts to the greatest possible degree: LOSS OF INDUSTRIAL LAND: The project would remove 155 acres from potential heavy industrial develop- ment - a site which is presently vacant, flat, and with probable access to deep ' water shipping. However, this site has been actively and unsuccessfully promoted for industrial use for several years and tenuous air quality standards and the proximity of the site to residential uses makes the likelihood of future industrial use on the site questionable. POSSIBLE CONFLICT WITH FUTURE BART RAIL EXTENSION: The BARTD designated the site as the preferred' location for a future BART station, should BART be extended to the Pittsburg-Antioch area. The adopted future BART alignment transects the Shell Property in a southwest to northwest direction. Because of the need to not preclude future BART options on the site, the amendment text references the BART station and future extension and designates the location of the commercial area as flexible to accommodate future BART requirements. Also, a Planned Unit District and phasing of any residential development to allow the inclusion of BARTD's plans are recommended as mitigation measures. IMPACT ON SANITATION DISTRICT 7A: Future residential development of the site will require annexation to Sani- tation District 7A. Until the planned subregional system is built in 1981 , only 500± connections are remaining under the existing system and Regional Water Quality Eontrol Board order. The General Plan change will allow substantial residential -2- 00734 Resolution No. 46-1978 development and therefore require the total remaining connections under the exist- ing Board order. This impact can be mitigated by phasing of the project in accord- ance with construction of the new subregional sewer system and annexation fees to the District could offset the costs of providing service. IMPACT ON EXISTING RETAIL USES IN WEST PITTSBURG: The General Plan allows a substantial area for development of a community shopping center. This could adversely impact existing small regail uses along Willow Pass Road and the Shore Acres Shopping Center should a community center be developed. The benefits of providing a substantial , centrally located area for a shopping center appears to outweigh the adverse impacts on existing retail uses which such a center would create. Most of these existing uses are margional ; West Pittsburg residents must travel either to Concord or Pittsburg for most .of their shopping needs. The General Plan Amendment allows for and encourages development of a community shopping center which is presently lacking in the existing community of 9,000 persons. IMPACT ON EXISTING INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: Existing industrial uses with heavy capital investment are located within 300-feet of the site. The General Plan Amendment allows residential uses in close proximity to these industrial uses creating possible conflict between them. This can be mitigated by providing for a buffer in the design of the project and by encouraging Planned Unit design in future phases of the project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other written and graphic materials developed for these proceedings are madee part of this record; and . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Planning Commission hereby instructs the Director of Planning to prepare the necessary transmittals and to submit them to the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 6, 1978, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Walton, Young, Milano, Compaglia, Phillips; Stoddard, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Donald E. Anderson, Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was uly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, June 13, 1978; and that this resolu- tion was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commiss- ion: -3- 00 0 ) Resolution No. 46-1978 AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Young, Phillips, Stoddard, Compaglia, Walton, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - - None. ABSENT: Commissioners None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. CVr� f the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Se Ayof ;Contra f the P anning Commissio of the un Costa, State of California 0073j In the Board of. Supervisors Contra Costa County, State- of California` June 27 , 19 78. in the Matter of ` Approving First Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement for Court Facility Remodel , Richmond., (4403-4188) The Board of Supervisors..APPROVES and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute the First Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services with Hardison & Komatsu Associates for programming and master planning of the Court Facility Remodel , Administration Building, Richmond. The Amendment provides for enlarging the project scope and also provides for payment limit of $9,500.00: • PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 17 f - hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originated by: P. W. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings and Grounds Supervisors cc: Public Works Dept: affixed this�_�day of June . 19 78 Agenda Clerk Accounting Section via Agenda Clerk J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Architectural Division County Auditor-Controller BY Deputy Cleric Accts Payable Sandra L. ieison County Administrator (info only) Hardison & Komatsu Assoc. H-24 4/77 15m oO l3 1 - , � r FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE COURT FACILITY REMODEL, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, RICHMOND L Effective Date and Parties: Effective on June 6, 1978, Hardison & Komatsu Associates herein called "Contractor"), and the County of Contra Costa (herein called "County"), a political subdivision of. the State of California, mutually agree as follows: II. Purpose: The parties desire to amend that contract they entered into, effective November 15, 1977, entitled "Consulting Services Agreement". This Agreement was for architectural programming and master planning for the Court Facility Remodel , Administration Building, Richmond Budget Line Item No. 4403-4188. III. Amendments: The Agreement for Architectural Services is hereby amended as follows: 1 . Article 1 (e) : Payment Limit. Delete in its entirety and replace with the following: "(e) Payment Limit: $9,500.00" 2. Appendix "A". Add the following paragraphs to Scope of Architectural Services: "5. Detailed meetings and interviews with the key personnel in the following departments: Superior Court Municipal Court Juvenile Court Court Clerk District Attorney Probation and Others Review the environment of the existing courtrooms." RECEIVED 6. Provide studies of alternate locations for each of the departments being considered for relocation, to- gether with verbal evaluation of the merit of each JUIN 0 1973 proposal ." J. R. OLSSON 7. Analyze and recommend applicable revisions to the CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS report prepared by others entitled "Facility Uti 1 iza- T co tion Study, County Administration Complex, July 1975. B . De Relate department needs to the work station standards outlined therein or modify standards to satisfy this program. Develop "Net Assignable Areas" and "Type Work Station" for each assigned person." Microfilmed with board order 00738 smma of cmipoRmA, San Francisco City C� f owt�r + i 5th June 1� ear ore thowand Mine On thU .l--.of �t y r, hodred seventy-e�ghtt,�eaws t,. Rut t bur x a Notary Public, Store of California„ drip coearr"O"d and" nd sworn, personalty appeared DONALrD HARD 1 SON hmm to me to be the person—awhosi s e+d to the=akin • Y�'`` iartrnra�t,and acedged to she that_.he,.�..execntsd the save. 'µ 1N WITNESS WHEREOF 1 have heresaao set my hand and affixed my off at seal r r City Courtly of San Francisco #L.day and C14L S .. �`;L - Fj . ear ir►t c Wfkate fast above urittm . Nic I � °H�rs� or e JL4 rAFs Af`ip r o` ` Notary Public,State of California. Cowkry's Furry No.36—Aetmowkd99m=t-cenCW My Commission -Ma r 17, 1981 'C-C- CC.V 1199) R. 911170 V i 00 r 39 "8. Determine feasibility of- penetrating end shear walls, ' south wing, with windows-." IV. Effect: Except for the amendments agrQedrto herein, the .agreement of November 15, 1977 remains in full force and effect. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ARCHITECT: PUBLIC FORKS DEPARTMENT i y By B ernon L. C the Donald Hardison Public Works Director dba Hardison & Komatsu Assoc_ F; RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: ;. By - Arthur, G. Will County Administrator ByR. M. Rygh, Deputy PUb is Works Director Buildings and Grounds 00 NO In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, . 1978 In the Matter of Partial Closure of Certain Streets for "Holy Ghost Procession" Parade, Oakley Area. On the recommendation of the Public Works Director IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is granted the Holy Ghost. Committee to partially close O'Hara Avenue, Home Street; :Second Street and Third Street on July 16, 1978 between 10 :00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. to hold its annual "Holy Ghost Procession" Parade.' The closure is subject to conditions set• for.th relative to parades in Resolution No. 4714, including a requirement that the *Holy Ghost Committee furnish a certificate at insurance ($500,000 Combined Single Limit Public Liability and Property Damage', or an amount agreed upon by the County Administrator) and that _the. County is named as additional insured. FURTHER, IT IS BY THE BOARD RECOMMENDED that the Public-. Works Director be authorized to request the State Department of Transportation to grant a partial closure of State Highway 4 - for the parade. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. Originating Department: PWD(LD) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this 27thday of June 19 78 Holy Ghost Committee P.O. Box 466 Oakley, CA 94561 - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk State Department of By -41Deputy Clerk Transportation c/o Public Works Dept. Sandra L: ,Ni s.on H-24 4177 15m 00 Al In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Appointment to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Mountain View area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. On the recommendation of Supervisor N. C. Fanden; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Ms. Evelyn Alford, 914 Lemon Street, Martinez, California 94553 is APPOINTED to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Mountain View area) of the Countywide_ Housing and Community Development Advisory -Committee; PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the- minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Ms . E. Alford Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27th day of June 1978 County Administrator Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By eputy Clerk Robbie ierrez 00"142 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, . State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Appointment to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee '(Vine Hill area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. On the recommendtion of Supervisor N. C. .Fanden, ITIS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Frank L. McNamer, #7 Robinsdale Road, Martinez, California 94553 is APPOINTED to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Vine Hill area) of the CountT,7ide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee; PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of dh order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Mr. F. L. McNamara Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27thday of June 19 78 County Administrator Public Information Officer —� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By eputy Clerk bbie u "errez H-2aamism OU�' 3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Local Enforcement Agency for Solid Waste Management Board. The Board having received Approval No 78-13• adopted by the State Solid Waste Management Board approving "Notice of - Designation of Local Enforcement Agency" submitted by the County Health Department to carry out provisions of the Z'berg-Kapiloff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976;' IT IS BY THE BOARD- ORDERED-that receipt of. said Approval is ACKNOWLEDGED and the same is REFERRED to the Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden). PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Solid Waste Management Board Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of (Supe. E. H. Hasseltine)Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 27th day of June . 19 78 Environmental Control Director of Human Resources Health Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By 'Deputy Clerk axine M. Neufe 00744 H-24 4/77 15m RECEIVEDJF i 1-1i'l 19 19 718 ,��,;^2 .0-0 1978 COUNTY r- STAM SOLS TIAS� l..A_�L4Cr'i�?`iT BO-,'70 •. J. R. OLSSON pNti3ENTA► '+�nLT►, CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONT rA Co. LOCAL MIF-0RCE ,"I+ AC✓NCY APPRWAL ITO. 78-13-IE 4 Deputy WINE OF A(ENCES: The Contra Costa County Health Department, Division of Errvi-romental Health and the City of Antioch Planning Department, the City of Concord Public Works Department, the City of El Cerrito Public Works Department, the City of Hercules Public S•i'orks Department, -the C,`*'ty of Martinez Public Works Department, the City of Pinole Public Works Department, the City of Pittsburg Community Development Department,F ngineering. DivIsicn, the City of Pleasant H:.11.•Camuniity Development, and the City of Walnut Creek City :•Tanager. ' JURISDICTION: _ Contra Costa County WHF...REAS, the Zlbero Kapiloff Solid Waste Control Act of 1976 requires that there shall be designated within each county an enforcement agency to carry out the provisions of the Act; and TH -kS, the State Solid Waste Management Board has received and reviewed the Psot_ce of Designation dated FTarnh 6, 1978 from the Contra Costa County Health Department, Division of �;rwnental Health; and W?EISAS, the State Solid Waste Management Board has received a recccmendation -for approval from the State. Depart lent of Health, arA S+r-am45, the Board has determined that the proposed enforcement agency, the Ccu ty Health Department, Division of Environmental Health of the County of Cora Costa is q+,a' ?;ed to became the local enforcement agency for the Ccern Ly of Contra Cc ' a and the cities with-1-in the county for both health and non-health related staff s, except for the following cities where the County F.ealUa reza mem w�, cecaae the local enforcement agency for health related ste-nda- .s c ly,nd the Boa-rd has determined the proposed enforcement agencies are v'_l a_•i to bec=e tae local enforcement agency for non-health related =C= s ENFORCE Ur AM, ICY er_t_och Planning Department " Corco7d Public Works Department '17"1 Carrico Public Works Department Farcu es Public Works Depar`unent Mart-nez Psbli.c Work:-- Department ment pi nole Psblic lrior_ks De-oaetz,.ent Pi lusbu_rg - C=_unit Development Depar`tm L EngineeriM-C', Division_ Pleasant H,i?1 C(=-unity Develour:ent I:aln,=t meek City Manager _ - L� Miarofilm6d with board order 1Q -- -- _---- -- �„ ... — 2 — J? -4 TiEPz-FOS„ Bu IT IESOLQED, based on the foregoing considerations the State Solid waste Management Board, pursuant,to Section 66796.21 of the Carer -3n-t code, -approves the proposed designation of the Contra Costa County Health Department, Division of Environmental Health to be the local enforc---ne*rt agency for the County of Contra Costa a►A the Cities ;,rithin the county for both health and non-health related standards, except,-for the follcities for which the Board approves the. Contra Costa`County Health Department, Division. of Environmental Health to be the local enforcement agency for health-related items and approves the proposed local enforcement agency designations for non-health - related items and approves the proposed local enforcement agency desiaariations for non-health related standards as listed below: CITY ENE OPMZENT AENCY .Antioch planning l nn ng Department ' Concord Public.jJorks •Department El Cerrito Public Works Department Hercules Pablic Works Depa37.men€ Martinez -Public Wor'lks.Department Pinole Public Works Department Pittsburg Community Development Engineering Pleasant Hill Community Development Walnut Creek City Manager I, Albert A. 24ar-ino, Executive Officer, do hereby certify the foregoing is a full, true, and correct cony of the action taken by the State Solid Waste 2:a.*iagement Board at its April 21, 1978 meeting. CERTIFICATICU Albert A. 24arino Executive officer p Date SDR 2 1 1978 00'i J In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June X27 , 19-78 In the Matter of Appointments to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee' (Montalvin Manor area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. On the recommendation of Supervisor N. C. Fanderi," IT- IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following persons' 'are APPOINTED to - the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Montalvin Manor, area) of. the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee: Sondra L. Raine 1296 Karen Road San Pablo, 94806 Ronald L. Bless 1296 Karen Road San Pablo 94806 PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc• Appointees Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27thday of June 19 78 County Administrator Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk I3y / Deputy Clerk ie errez . H-24 4177 15m In the Board of Supervisors t of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , t4 78 In the Matter of Appointment to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Rodeo area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. On the recommendation of Supervisor N. C. Fanden;' IT IS' BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mr. Mal Phillips, 509 First Street, Rodeo, California 94572 is APPOINTED to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (Rodeo area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee; PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: . Mr. M. Phillips Witness my hand and the Seal of the;Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this_7th day of j mA , 19_2& County Administrator Public Information Officer - J,. R. OLSSON, Clerk. 1 ' Deputy Cleric bbie ierrez, 00'748 H-24 4n7 15m 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June '27 ' 19 M In the Matter of Appointments to Neighborhood Preservation Committee of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee On the recommendation of Supervisor J. P. 'Kenny;' IT' IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Tollowing persons are APPOINTED to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee (NorthRichmond area) of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee: Paul Hernandez 730 Alamo Avenue Richmond 94801 Mrs. Domitilda Reyes 60 Willard Avenue Richmond 94801 Dennis James Price 1722 4th Street Richmond 94801 PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978 t 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is'a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Appointees Witness my hand.and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Auditor-Controller- affixed this 27thday of June . 19 78 County Administrator Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Robbie Vugierrez,, UU",49. H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 . 19 78 In the Matter of Appointment to Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee. Supervisor R. I. Schroder having recommended that Ms. Jane Nissen Laidley, 13 Melody Lane,•* Orinda,.' California 94563 be appointed .to the Couatywide 'Hous#g and Community Development Advisory Committee as a representative of Supervisorial District III; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Schroder is APPROVED. c PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. • l hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seel of the Board of Cc: Ms. J. N. Laidley Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this27th day of June i9 78 Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee _ J. R. OLSSON, Cleric County Administrator By Deputy Clerk County Auditor-Controller Public Information Officer Robbie Gu&eIrrez 00750 H-24 4/77 15m IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA June 27, 1978 In the Matter of ) ) Approving the Second Amendment to the } Consulting Services Agreement, Waterfront ) Road Overhead and Approaches, Martinez ) Area ) Project No. 3481-4215-925-75 ) The Board on February 7, 1978 approved a Consulting Services Agreement with DeLeuw, Cather and Company providing construction inspection and field engineering services for the Waterfront Road Overhead and Approaches Project; and The Board on March 28, 1978 approved an Amendment to said Agreement which provided for changing the effective date from.February 7, 1978 to December 15, 1977; and The Public Works Director having recommended that the maximum allowable raimbursa.mg. to the soils sub-consultant (Moore & Taber of Watt Sacramento) be increased from $2,500 to $6,500 to provide additional work as described in the Amendment and that the maximum allowable reimbursement to the Consultant be increased from $62,500 to $66,500 to provide for all services required] IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Second Amendment to the Consulting Services Agreement with DeLeuw, Cather and Company dated February 7, 1978 is APPROVED and that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute it on behalf of the County. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors 'on the date aforesaid. Witness my .hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 27thday sof June , 19 78 Originator: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Department Construction Division By Deputy Clerk Sandra L. Nie son cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller DeLeuw, Cather and Company (via Public Works, Construction Division) 001751 2ND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT (Engineering Services) 1 . EFFECTIVE DATE AND PARTIES. Effective on June 217 1978, DeLeuw, Cather & Company (herein called "Consultant"), and the aunty of Contra Costa (herein called "County"), a political subdivision of the State of California, mutually agree as follows: 2. PURPOSE. The parties desire to amend that Agreement they entered into, effective February 7, 1978, and as previously amended March 28, 1978, entitled "Consulting Services Agreement". 3. AMENDMENTS. The parties hereby amend said Agreement as follows: a) Paragraph 5 of the PAY14ENT section of Part 11 shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted: Consultant shall be reimbursed by County at the direct invoice cost for professional services provided by the soils sub- consultant, Moore & Taber of West Sacramento, including the installation of piezometers to determine sub-surface pore pressures and other critical sub-surface soils conditions, to provide advice on special embankment construction techniques and to provide further professional services at the request of the Public Works Director. The maximum reimbursement .under this paragraph shall not exceed Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($6,500). b) Paragraph 8 of the PAYMENT section of Part Il shall be -deleted and the following shall be substituted: Compensation Limit. In no event shall the total compensation and reimbursement paid hereunder exceed a maximum sum of Sixty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($66,500) for all of the services required, unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. . 4. EFFECT. Except for the amendments agreed to herein, the Agreement of February 7, 1978 remains in full force and effect. COUNTW. el A CONSULTANT DeLEUW, CATHER & COMPANY ByR.I.Schroder o ,. 0 airman Board of Supervisors By PAA1. 1. Gilboa, Seni9A V-r ce Pres i dent & Attest: �p * _ Western Regions Manager C�ahi ty 1 erk . By (/ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Deputy CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO) On June lb, 1978, before the undersigned /^�� n L. notary Public j VernoCi �s1rrector for:-th& Stage of California, personally appeared 1 . Gilboa, known to me Approved as to form: to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged John B. Clausen, County Counsel that he eaec ed the same. a F ` By CIL14 Deputy) Contra Costa County Proj. No. 3481-4215-925-75 OFFICIAL SEAL (Waterfront Road - SPRR Overcrossing) (. FIENRIETTA S 6 EBB-Z %�"b• PU911C —. CALIFORNIA "IP-TIPAL OFFtCE by SAN FRA,yCt$CO COUNTY Microfilmed with board order Q9!52 �Y Commission Expires April 17, I9SO s; In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California _.. , .. ,. , . June 27 , 19 ._ 11n th Matter of _. . Hearing on- the, �tequest _of Citation- ,. Builders (2200-RZ) to R.ezoae� Land in the .San Ramon Area and Preliminary Development Plan. The Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, owner. The Board on May 23, 1978 having fixed this time for hearing on the recommendation of the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission with respect to tiie request of Citation Builders (2200-RZ) to rezone land in the San Ramon area.from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Planned Unit District (P-1) and for approval of a' Preliminary Development Plan; and No one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having, adyised that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was filed for this proposal; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS ORDERED that the request of Citation Builders is APPROVED as recommended by the Area Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ordinance Number 78-4.6 giving effect to the aforesaid rezoning is INTRODUCED, reading waived and July 5, 1978 is set for adoption of same. s PASSED by the Board on June:-.27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of c?n order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. W'itness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc• Citation Builders The Roman Catholic Bishop Supervisors of Oakland affixed this 7t-hday of Jung Mr. T. Hanson Director of Planning LSSON, Clerk County Assessor By Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl . H-24 4/77 15m 001753 In the Board . of ;Supervisors of; Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, , 19 78 In the Matter of Waiving the requirement for a Consent to Dedication - Subdivision MS 56-78 Byron Area It is by the Board ORDERED that the requirement for -a,- Consent to Dedication for Subdivision MS 56-78 as required by the Subdivision Ordinance of Contra Costa County is hereby WAIVED. ? PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid Originating Department: PWD (LD) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervison cc: Recorder (via P.W. ) affixed this_7tH day of �T31ne . 19---78 Public Works Director Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Assessor Gwendolyn Richart By Deputy Clerk Rt 1, Box 88 Sandia L.,Nie Son Byron, CA 94514 U01'l54 H-24 4/77 15m Q . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 $ 1978 In the Matter of Lawsuit of Travalini Furniture Co. for Tax Refund , Travalini Furniture Company having filed an action for - recovery of property taxes in the Contra Costa Superior, Court and the Assessor and County Counsel having recommended a compromise settlement in the sum of $5,000, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that County Counsel is authorized to execute,whatever documents are necessary for settlement of the subject action by stipulated judgment and that the Auditor-Controller pay $5,000 to Travalini- Furniture Co. , Inc. upon receipt of the -filed Stipulation for Judgment and Order for Judgment. PASSED on June 27, 1978 by the Board of Supervisors. 0 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Counsel Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Assessor Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 27thday of .Tlina 19-78 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clark g�/lZ Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neurelld 01`r5 H-24 4/77 15m . �kJ COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Oq MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA Date: June 15, 1978 To: The Board of Supervisors From: John B. Clausen, County Counsel By: Dennis C. Graves, Deputy County Counsel Re: Travalini Furniture Co. v. County of Contra Co ta, et al- Contra Costa Superior Court No. 182846 County Counsel and E. F. Vlanaka, Assessor, hereby recommend that 1) the Auditor be authorized to pay $5000 to Travalini Futniture Co. , Inc. , in settlement of the subject action, and 2) County.' Counsel be authorized to execute whatever documents are necessary for settlement of the action.' In this case, Travalini Furniture has sought in excess of $30 ,000 in tax refunds, after hearing and decision by the Assessment Appeals Board. Due to the'difficult questions of fact and law j which pose a substantial risk of judgment adverse to the County, the County Counsel and Assessor recommend settlement in the sum of $5000, which Travalini has agreed to accept in full compromise of all its claims. DCG-.g cc: Assessor Auditor RECEIVED j�LL Y i Attn: Sam Kimoto Steven Ybarra .fUtd 1y 178 J. R. OLSSON CLUK BOARD OF SU?EWSOM COSTA CO. • 00 5r" Microfilmxl with board order t-- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California June 27 , ig 78 In the Matter of The Final Report on Enterprise Fund I.1plementation Policies, Plans, Procedures, and Interdepartmental Agreements The Board on June 11, 1978, having referred to its Finance . Committee (Supervisors Eric H. Hasseltine and Nancy C. Fanden) a final report from the Director, Human Resources Agency, and the County Administrator on . implementation plans for an Enterprise Fund in County Medical Services; and Said Committee having this day recommended the following: Approve the. Enterprise Fund implementation policies, plans, procedures, and interdepartmental agreements as set forth in detail in Appendices 1-9 of Attachment 4 to the final report with the understanding that implementation of the agreement between CMS and PH will be delayed until such time as the staffing transfers and additions noted in the chart on Estimated Costs and Offsets for EF Implementation can be carried dut.--. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Finance Committee is APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct coPy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisor on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Count Medical Director Supervisors County affixed this 27th of June . 19 78 Count, administrator Y County Auditor-Controller J R. OLSSON, Cleric Sy Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-2;4177 15m ■ n■ Fps t 0 J _ ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 1 KWAGERENT INFORMATION SYSTEM The Joint Information Task Force (without consultant assistance). has written a plan for the development of a.Comprehensive Information System for County Medical Services. This "plan for, planning," which:is attached, is designed to fulfil the long-term needs of Medical. Services for an adequate information system that serves both the requirements for fiscal/ business information and patient/program information. The Joint Information Task Force recommends that the "plan for planning" be approved with the understanding that it is subject to possible modi fications and revisions on the basis of consultant recommendations.or changing requirements as the plan is implemented. CHAS Support for EF Specifications for program changes necessary to implement EF (primarily accounting services) have been presented to Data Processing in the Auditor-Controller Office for action. It is anticipated thatthechanges = will be completed for use at the time of conversion to EF in the new fiscal year. ATTFC2�-TNT: Plan for the Development'of a Comprehensive informac2 System for Contra.Costa County Medical Services 00"58 June 1, 1973 r D 111,1 j PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CQMPREHENSRT M[FORNINTION SYST I FOR FOR DISCUSSION ONLY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES The following "plan for planning" is intended to lead to a Medical Information System (MIS) for Contra Costa County Medical Services which will a. improve day-to-day patient care and operational support b. improve management control, planning, and evaluation of services c. maximize charge collection and revenue recovery r d. integrate data from physically separate facilities e. improve the speed and accuracy of communication among functional areas f. reduce redundant information processing The purpose of this Plan is to create an orderly means of assessing current , information-handling practices, identify areas where gaps or inefficiencies exist, define clear objectives for improvement, describe and evaluate alter- native strategies for achiewring these objectives, and obtain resources for irrplemezting, the chosen strategy or strategies_ The motivating assumption is that CCMS is not fully exploiting the potential contributions of computer technology to patient care and administrative support_ This assumption will be tested during the implementation of this developmental plan; even if true, however,, realization of potential benefits, if the experience of other medi- cal settings is any guide, will not flocs directly and easily from a statement of potential benefits. Successful completion of this project will depend on certain conditions being met. 1. `Management involvement is a crucial element in this plan. Managers and administrators must be willing to devote adequate •time• to identification of current and future needs. 2. A small group of staff, such as the existing management information task force, must be available for frequent, intensive meetings as-well as for carrying out individual assignments. 3. Adequate funding must be identified before decisions regarding project scope can be made. 4. Organizational responsibility as between Medical Services, the Auditor- Controller's Office, and other departments affected directly or indirectly 7.1 by the proposed comprehensive MIS must be clarified. This m } )n� e e transfer to Medical Services of certain functions presently r o y h r departments, and would be in keeping with the Enterprise Fim i FOR DISCUSSION ONLY STAGE I - ASSESSMENT OF TOTAL APPLICATION POTENTIAL A. Analyze current functions and supporting information-processing procedures 1. Devise interview protocol - see Appendix A for draft 2. Pre-test protocol and revise 3. Interview: a. all administrative staff b. 'sample of employees involved in data generation, retXSeval, storage, and outside reporting c. sample of direct-service providers d. Paul O'Rourke and Bob Van Horne ' e. Auditor-Controller personnel involved with current systems 4. Create flow charts for all current automated and manual information processing. B. Review appropriate urritem materials, including: 1. Internal CHAS evaluations ' 2. Information Systems Committee documentation 3. Auditor-Controller's reviews of billing system 4. O'Rourke and Associates report S. Ernst and Ernst report 6. MMS modification requests 7. Reports produced manually in absence of MIS support C. Assess state of the art 1. Tabulate, by functional area, claimed applications of systems operational in similar settings. 2. Determine, through site visits and other direct contact, actual functioning of systems reviewed in 1. c D. Review existing GESS systems, in terms of accuracy, co t r sslast, tems, usefulness, timeliness, completeness 1. Internal reporting and control systems, including FOR DISCUSSION ONLY a. CHAS b. MHIS c. Laboratory, system d. Inventory system (if installed) 2. External reporting systems, including a. CHFC b. PAS c. CASH d. HAS 3. These reviews will include general descriptions, where appropriate, *of hardware and software, and detailed description of functional applica- tions. 4. Determine actual costs associated with each system reviewed. E. Assess anticipated changes in 01S which will impact on information-processing requirements 1. Decentralization/regionalization 2. PrPJf•NYJ 3. Research and demonstration grants 4. Enterprise system S. Coordination with other hospitals and their data systems F. Summarize problems associated with existing manual and automated systems. G. Summarize unmet information needs 1. Mandated 2. Desirable 3. Current 4. Anticipated ; H. Develop general design, by functional area, for potential MIS applications (see Appendix B for preliminary list of areas) 00161 n A I_ Review proposed applications with administrative staff in FOR DISCUSSION ONLY J_ Eliminate clearly unfeasible applications. K. STAGE I report: Preliminary estimate of major costs and benefits STAGE II - REQUIRaJENTS AND STRATEGIES A. Rank potential MIS applications. - Criteria could include: 1. inandated functions 2. cost-effectiveness a. reduction of lost charges b. reduction of clerical expenses for data entry and correction 3. state of the art 4. qualitative improvements in service S. multiple uses of same data B. Strategic decisions 1. Identify alternative strategies for achieving MIS goals. Among the • numerous possibilities (not mutually exclusive) are: a_ Distributed processing b. Shared services c. Dedicated ,aa- 'computer(s) with shared host d. Real-time update only vs update and retrieve in same or all application areas e. Integrated fiscal, service, and patient data vs. separate but tangentially interacting systems 2. Choose strategy based on applications hierarchy C. Develop long-range plan based on applications hierarchy and chosen strategy. D. Detailed requirements statement 1. Choose applications to be designed and installed within one year. 2. Develop specific, quantified operational and outcome objectives for high-value applications. 3. Develop one-year plan for achievement of high-value objectives. L 00'762 E. STAGE II Report: Revised estimate of major costs and b i H . Li FOR DISCUSSION ONLY F. Decision to continue, modify, or terminate MIS project. STAGE III - REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS AND PROPOSAL EVALUATION A. Develop RFP (see Appendix C for possible outline) B. Screen potential vendors C. Distribute RFP to selected vendors D. Specify selection criteria and weighting for each. Criteria will vary depending upon strategy chosen, but could include 1. Relevance and usefulness of applications -• a. Congruence with 01S objectives b. Format of reports c. Error detection and correction d. Use documentation • 2. System reliability a. Demostrated reliability of hardware and software b. Ease of use - "user-proof' • c. Back-up of software and data files 3. Vendor support a. Support during installation b. Ability to respond rapidly after installation for program and _ equipment maintenance c. Support for system enhancement 4. Flexibility and expandability in terms of volume and new application areas S. Existence of installations in comparable facilities -in Northern California 6. Corporate stability and length of existence 7. Number of actual current installations of systems similar to that proposed 00763 LruS. Cost FOR DISCUSSION ONLY a. Initial b. Continuing c. Total and per transaction 9. Performance guarantees 10. Ability to maintain and modify,system using GIS personnel.. E. Select vendor(s) STAGE IV INSTAL.LATIONI 0 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 2 BUDGET The interdepartmental Budget Task Force has agreed to the items of policy outlined below and recommends that these policies be adopted for Enter- arise Fund Budget in County Medical Services: *1. Initial Procedures for £F Budget in County Medical Services *a. Budget Preparation. Expenditure and revenue budgets prepared' Sy County Medical Services shall be prepared and presented at the departmental level (budget unit) and not at the low organi- zational (cost center) level. The Auditor-Controller shall continue to "price out" permanent salaries and benefits;. however, the permanent salaries vacancy factor shall be an item of discussion between County Medical Services, Human Resources Agency, Auditor-Controller, and the County Admini- strator's Office. County Medical Services shall prepare budget requests for temporary salaries and overtime related thereto (1013), overtime related to permanent employees ,(1014) and hourly physicians salaries (1016), permanent physicians salaries (1017), and permanent physicians additional duty pay (1018). County Medical Services shall prepare budget requests for a?? oti:__ ;?assifi.cations of expenditures (formerly con- tained in the 2000 accounts (services and supplies) and the 3000 accounts (special service assessments and negotiated damages)), except where the Auditor-Controller may provide budget input for data processing services and supplies, and microfilm services, and where Public Works may provide budget input for the use of county equipment; and where the County Ip Admirist_rator may provide budget input for insurance, including public liability, medical malpractice, fire and extended coverage, workers' compensation, and unemployment compensation. *3. Appropriation Adjustments. County Medical Services shall have the authoritg to adjust appropriations within' the Major Expen- diture Classifications (1000 accounts;Personnel and Benefits) and among and between the California Health Facilities Commis- sion (CH?C) Major Expense Classifications Professional Fees, Supplies, Purchased Services, and other Direct Expense--without the necessity of approval by the Board of Supervisors. *c. Reserve for Contingency. The expense budget shall contain a reserve for contingency normally at about 2z of the gross operating budget; exceptions may be made where extenuating circumstances indicate that such allowance would not be prudent. Any appropriation adjustment to the appropriated reserve for contingency shall require approval of the Contra Costa-County Board of Supervisors. * Because of the importance of these policy items in converting to BE, they are also contained in a separate proposed Board Order attached to this report-. (See ATTACHMENT 2.10(► 14 , ATTACHIMENT 4 Appendix 2 Pare 2 *d_ Capital Equipment. 1) Within the Enterprise Fund the format of the capital equip- ment budget must be the same as it currently is under the County line .item budget i.e., each Capital Equipment item listed with a specific appropriation identified.. However, a miscellaneous line item may be included. Item..... ............$ Item..................... Item.....................$ Item.....................$ Miscellaneous.............$ 2) The Enterprise Fund would be allowed to 'substitute indivi- dual items up to $2,500 without Board of Supervisors approval. 3) The Enterprise Fund would be allowed to transfer funds among individual items as long as no individual item is incre-ased by more than $1,000. A request to increase an individual line item appropriation by more than $1,000 will require Board of Supervisors approval. 4) The appropriation for the miscallaneous category may not exceed 15 percent of the total appropriation for capital equipment. 5) 3'ndlvidua2 items within the Miscellaneous category gray not exceed $2,500. r 2. Budgeting for Depreciation. % - Buildings and capital equipment will be depreciated .in the .usual mar-ner_ The depreciation computed will be an operating expense and therefore included as a component of the County General Fund subsidy. The offsetting credit will be a restricted reserve which will apply to future replacement of capital items. The capital requirement in excess of available restricted amounts will be subsidized by the General Fund separately as an increase in Donated-Capital. * Because of the importance of these policy items in converting to EF, they are also contained in a separate proposed Board Order attached to this report. (See ATTACMIENT 2.) r • 00 765... ATTACF!HVII-P 4 Appendix 2 Page 3 3. Relationship Between General Fund and Enterprise Fund. The relationship between the General Fund (GF) and the Enterprise Fund (EF) is one that will be established through the budget.process and without separate Board Resolution since the Board of Supervisors will in effect approve a recommended EF Budget and the related County Subvention (contribution) in the normal budget process. 4. Rate-Setting Frequency_ A rate-setting review will be conducted at mi-z*mum frequency' inter- vals of every six months, and recommended rate changes will be submitted for approval at least once each year. 5_ FY 1978-79 Budget. CMS, hRA, and CAO representatives have discussed the FY 1978-79 EF Expenditure Estimates and the £F Revenue Estimates which are in the process of being finalized by BRA and CAO. These recommendations will serve as a basis for the finalization of an Enterprise Fund Budget for County Medical Services_ 0 f. ATTACHM&IT 4 Appendix 3 ACCOUNTIIG SERVICES The interdepartmental Accounting Task Force has agreed to the items of policy outlined below and recommends that these policies be adopted for Enterprise Fund Accounting in County Medical Services: 1. Insurance a. The County maintains a self-insurance fund for public liability and medical malpractice claims. The Administrator calculates annual amounts necessary to maintain the fund in a viable condi- tion. b. Property insurance (fire, boiler, etc.) -is carried for the County by an outside carrier. c. The Administrator calculates the annual amounts chargeable to Medical Services and arranges with the Auditor to pass these costs, accordingly, to Medical Services. *d. Assuming the total insurance costs are charged to EF early in the year, they will be carried in a prepaid account and 1/12 charged off each month. Otherwise an estimated amount will be charged to operations each month and accrued in a liability account. (The prepa=d or accrual entries would be made by EF only.) e. Self-insurance costs will continue to be carried on the EF books • for rate and P & L purposes. However, since only actual losses are claisabie from Medicare, Medi-Cal, and Short-Doyle, adjust- ments for srca losses will be made in the cost reports. *2. P=eoa_d Expenses Expenses paid in advance of the period to which they are applicable will be carried in a prepaid expense account until the applicable period has been reached. (The prepaid entries would-be made by EF only. Example: Employee Health Benefit Premiums 3. "Interde_oartmental" 'Entris a_ Interdepartmental charges (OUT) for patient services provided: Change accounting so that the effect on EF will be to credit patient revenues and debit cash. * The Auditor and Medical Services have agreed to this concept so long as it can be established.that the accounting treatment is cost effective. c• 001A, ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 2 b. Snterdepartmental charges (OUT) for nonpatient services provided: Change accounting so that the net effect on EF will be to credit r`scellaneous revenues and debit cash. c_ Interdepartmental charges (IN) for services received: Change accounting so that the net effect on EF will be to debit expense and credit cash. 4_ Revenue Reporting by Cost, Center Rev`n_ues by Cost Center will be recorded at the level of gross.-patient charges. _ *5. 2cc=ued Expenses RegIar monthly County charges which are posted too late for entry into the current month will be accrued and charged to the current month's operations and reversed in the month in which the charges are received_ ; Example: Pro rata share of costs of Civil Service, Auditor, Retirement, etc. Iso, outside FIH contracts and other known significant items. 6. p_d_- Medicare, Medi-Cal, Short-Doyle Cost Report Settlements a. Those for FY 1977-78 and prior: Retain in GF. b_ Tose for r 1978-79 and after: Maintain on EF books. (Might reig'.L're spe-cial County subvention.) c_ Since fi_^_a' settlements occur in years following actual cost- report years, treat them as separate items in the Fund Balance. Do not apply to current revenues. 7. Accor..=s P,ecei7able a_ Transfer or accounts receivable balances, along with associated reserves for uncollectibles, from GF to EF. Assigned accounts and others deemed uncollectible should be transferred to EF at boot value, along with a 100% reserve for bad debts. b. The auditor--Controller will remain responsible for calculating Che reserves for bad debts against the various receivabl-es. * The Auditor and Medical Services have agreed to this cdncept so long as it can be established that the accounting treatment is cost effective. ao-4ss ! f ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 3 B. Inventories Transfer of Stores and Pharmacy inventory values from GF to EF. 9_ M-.c=—'trance Carry-Forwards The value of any encumbrance carry forwards to EF will be added to the approved budget. 10. Medi-Cal Obligations a. 3udget Medi-Cal County share in GF. ' *b. As offset amounts from the State are credited. to the County, transfer cash from GF to EF in the amount of the offsets. c. Pay balances due State out of GF. 11. Cafeteria Revenue Under EF, change Medical Services' accounting treatment for Cafeteria rec—'pts from an expense reduction item to a revenue item (within the General Ledger classification, "Other Operating Revenue") . ` 12. Pa_e_^_t-5 :,ii=i: Comfy Medical Care Program (CM-CP) Source of Payment C_assi=_cation The portion of a patient's Medi-Cal liability covered by the County in accordance wii.:a the CMCP policy will be treated as revenue to the EF. 13. Ird_cent Paten= Se_•-vices Indigent patient services: Change accounting so that the net effect on EF will be to credit patient revenues and debit cash. **14_ Coun-ty "Start-Up" Contribution to EF Record the value of "Start-Up" Assets which are contributed to the EF at its inception in the equity section of the EF balance sheet, Lin-der the caption, "Donated Capital - County." Once established, the a:--+ount in this account will remain unchanged until such time as * The Auditor has agreed to credit EF with the offsets at the time re- mittance advices are received from Blue Cross. ** Acco`nts Receivable, Fixed Assets, Inventories, and Petty Cash Fund; also, Capital Lease Obligation Liability. r 00770 ATTACH1rENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 4 the enterprise ceases operation and is liquidated. This is similar to the capital invested by shareholders of a private corporation. (P.eference: GAAFP, 1968, page 61.) 15. Trade Accounts Payable a. At the end of this fiscal year (6/30/78), it is expected that the Auditor's office will charge to Medical Services, by Cost Center, any trade accounts due but not yet paid, with an offsetting credit to an accounts payable liability. b. With the changeover to EF (7/1/78), the Auditor's office will record these payables in the EF accounts, by Cost Center, as credits to expense (with an offsetting debit- to EF cash) . c. Thereafter, at the end of each year, the Auditor will repeat the process as stated in Paragraph 1, above, except that the expense and liability entries will appear In the EF books, not GF. 'At the beginning of the following year, the Auditor will cause the above expense and liability entries to be reversed in the EF. 16. Fixed Assets L *a. Transre_ of land and buildings at: original cost, plus improvements, along with acc•,^ulated reserves for depreciation from the County Fixed Asset Account to EF. Only land and buildings wholly occu- pied by Medical Services will be transferred (with the exception of the modul—ar building on Hospital grounds occupied by the Eligi- bility Unit, which also will be transferred to EF). b. Other buildings only partly occupied by Medical Services will remain in to County Fixed Asset Account. Monthly, Medical Ser- vices EF will be charged its pro rats share of each building's costs (utilities, maintenance, repairs, gardening, depreciation, etc_). Such costs will be combined in one object of expense for entry on the E? books, with cost details available as required. c. Transfer equi Went at original cost, along with accumulated re- serves for depreciation. d. Annual building and equipment depreciation amounts will continue to be calculated by the Auditor and reported to Medical Services for entry on its books. * Hospital Buildings Seal Bluff Hilltop Sth Street, Richmond- (#059) 00 '7i n ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 5 17. Long-Terra Debt, 'Hospital Modular Buildings #251 and #252 The interest and principal payments to the Retirement System for the financing of the Hospital Modular Buildings are-currentlg being charged to Medical Services. Effective with the EF, the outstanding balance due on the loan ("Capital Lease Obligation") will be trans- ferred to EF. Accounting treatment on EF books: a. Transfer asset from County Fixed Asset Account to EF, 711178. DR Buildings (at original cost). DR Land (at original cost). CR Accumulated depreciation. CR Capital Lease Obligation (balance due as of 6/30/78. CR Donated Capital -- County. b. Monthly payment of principal and interest on Capital Lease Obli' gation. DR Capital T,ea_ Obligation (principal payment)DR Interest Expense (interest payment). CR Cash. c. Monthly Depreciation Expense Journal. DR Depreciation Expense. CR Reserve for Depreciation, d. Monthly occupancy charges for use by Social Service Eligibility unit_ DR Cash. Other-Oparat±ng Revenue_• The basis for the charges will consist of the Eligibility unit's pro rata share of depreciation, utilities, housekeeping, gardening, and maintenance expense, as well as its share of Cafeteria use. Subject to negotiation between Medical Services and Social Service, a fixed occupancy charge amount will be transferred by Journal each month to Social Service. 00772 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 6 18. Depreciation a. The Auditor will continue to calculate depreciation on Medical Services buildings and equipment and report applicable amounts to Medical Services at the end of each year. b. For buildings and equipment included in the EF's assets, Medical Services at the beginning of each year will estimate annual de- preciation amounts and make the necessary monthly Journal Entries' in the EF books. c. For buildings which are only partly occupied by Medical. Services. and which remain in the County Fixed Asset Account, the Auditor will include among the occupancy charges .to the EF no more than Medical Services' proportionate share of any depreciation costs. 19. Year-End A-87 Overhead Charges C14S will request Auditor to review, periodically, his monthly esti- mates and adjust when necessary to avoid large year-end adjustments,. 20. Nonoperating Cost Centers ' a. Other Hospitals, other outside 14edica2 Services (450, 461). b. Ambulance Service (451). c. State Hospital Transportation (4521. d. Corrmuni ty Herr• -I Health Consul to tions (453). , e. Outside Medical Consulting (454). f. Outside PEP Medical Services (462). g. Mental Health Contract Providers, Knolls (470, 471) h. Drug Abuse Programs (473, 475, 476,�'477, 478) .- Any 78) ;Any costs or revenues applicable to the above cost/revenue centers will be recorded in the "Nonoperating Revenue and Expenses" category . of the Chart of Accounts. 21. Medicare Treat Medicare billings as revenue and at the same t;me provide for an adequate allowance for contractual adjustments (contra revenue). 00773 ATTP.CEMFI ` 4 Appendix 3 Page 7 22. Medi.-Cal Regular Health Treat Medi-Cal Regular Health billings as revenue and at the same time provide for an adequate allowance for contractual adjustments (contra revenue). 23. HMO a. Treat HMO advances as HMO premium revenues in the year.to which they apply. b. Cost-settlement differences will be determined in the following year, at which time they will be applied to retained earnings. c. Include the "billing" values of HMO patient services in gross revenues by Cost Center, but only as a memo record. They will not appear as revenues in the financial statements.. 24. PHP a. Treat PHP premiums as PHP premium revenues in the year to-which they apply. i. Include the "biding" values of PEP patient services in gross revenues by Cost Center, but only as a memo record. They will not appear as revenues in the financial statements. 25. Short-Doyle a. Treat Short-Doyle claims as revenues in the year to which they ' apply. b. Cost-sett2eme t differences will be determined .in the following year, at which time they may be applied to Available Fund Balance. c. Include the "billing" values of Short Dogle patient services in gross revenues by Cost Center, but onlg as a memo record. They will not appear as revenues in the financial statements. 26. Medi-Cal MF. a. Treat Medi-Cal ME claims as revenues in the year to which they apply. b. Cost-settlement differences will be determined in the following year, at which time they may be applied to Ava.il'lble Fund Balance. c. Include the "billing" values of Medi-Cal MH patient services in gross revenues by Cost Center, but only as a memo record. They will not appear as-revenues in the financial statements. 00,774 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 3 Page 8 27. County Expenditure Accounts/CHFC Natural Classifications of Expense a. The following classes of County expenditure accounts will continue to be used in the EF system of accounts: 1) Payroll object codes: 1000 series of numbers. CF.AS will produce, as required, special payroll reports in the CHFC mode. 2) Plant acquisition object codes: 4500-4599 series of nambers'. 3) Fixed Asset object codes: 4950 series of numbers. b. All other expenses (now in the 2000 and 3000 County object series) will be converted to CHFC classifications 20 through.99, each' preceded by the number 28. Thus CHFC #33, Surgical Packs& Sheets, will be recorded as #2833 on all documents and reports; CHFC #62, Purchased Services, Medical, as #2861; etc. 28. Operating Surplus a. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the County General Fund subsidy required for the Enterprise Fund is computed based upon p--prosed budge= estimates. A transfer of 2/12 of the subsidy will be made L7 july to the Enterprise Fund to provide initial funding. Thereafter, 1/12 of the subsidy amount will be trans- ferred monthly except the last month. Revisions to the proposed budget will be taken into consideration in the remaining period following adop-ion of the final budget or any adjustments thereto by the Board o= Supervisors. , b. Any surplus Wit_.^.ds remaining at the end of the fiscal year will remain in the z;'nterprise Fund and will be considered a resource or working cap=tat available to finance the Enterprise Fund re- quirements for the following fiscal year. c. The above procedures follow current financial practice of the County. The Enterprise Fund will be a self-contained fund with a restricted reserve for the replacement of capital items. The surplus at the end of the year will reflect the effectiveness of the programs conducted by County Medical Services so that proper attention and recognition is received and the taxpayers are benefited. 29. Other Tasks Assigned Accounting Task Force • a. Curt of Accounts A complete chart of accounts in accordance with requirements of CHFC has been developed for C%IS in coordination with A/C. 007'75 ATTACHME-UT 4 Appendix 3 Page 9 b. Type and Frequency of Financial Reports As experience in the use of the Enterprise Fund Accounting System is gained during its first fiscal year, two new financial reports will be developed and refined: an income statement and a balance sheet report. Other financial reports will be considered for development, depending on their need and importance. c. Development and Testing of Computer Programs Specifications for program changes necessary to implement Enter- prise Fund accounting have been presented to Data Processing for action. It is anticipated that the.changes will be completed for use at the date of conversion to Enterprise in the new fiscal , year. d. Accounting Procedures,Manual The development of this manual will be undertaken as a joint effort between the A/C Systems Accountants and the accounting staff of CI-15 during the early stages of EF operations, w r • ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 4 BILLING/COLLECTIONS/ELIGIBILITY SERVICES The interdepartmental Billing and Collections Sub-Task Force has agreed on the following items of policy and plans and recommends that these policies and plans be adopted in developing the billing and collections services and procedures for Enterprise Fundi A. Billing and Collections Functions *1. Basic Policy Items a. Billings Medical Services will continue to render all billings. b. Receipt, Post, and -Balance Auditor-Controller will continue to receipt, post, and balance. c. Applying Payments Auditor Controller will continue to apply payments by,the-.same method currently being used. In the event of a problem or com- plaint, Medical Services will move the payment to the appropriate invoice as needed. d. Follow-Cu Medical Services will do all follow-up. Insurance follow-up procedures currently being done by Auditor-Controller will be transf_rred to Medical Services„ New procedures will be estab- lished by Medical Services for programs not being followed at this time. e. Patient Contact Medical Services will handle all patient contact. f. Credit Balance Reports Medical Services will work the Credit Balance Reports. g. Reserve for Bad Debts and Effective Rates Reserve for Bad Debts Analysis and Effective Rates will remain the responsibility of the Auditor-Controller but will be sent to Medical Services prior to implementation. * An appropriate interdepartmental agreement to cover these items is being prepared. , 007"17 ATTACEM NT 4 Appendix 4 Page 2 2. Continuing Planning and Actions a. Denials and Payments Procedures are currently being written for processing of infor- mation and documents between CMS and A/C regarding denials and Payments. b. Reorganization of Billing- Units CMS has developed plans for a complete reorganization of the. Billing Units and the procedures for this new process are being written. This new process will provide more efficient handling of claims, resolgtion for many problem areas, and a 3 to 4- month follow-up procedure that is expected to result in con- siderable increases in revenue_ 'It should be noted, however, that the entire reorganization is dependent upon making avail- ' able the space planned to accommodate all the billing units in downtown Martinez. The continuing deferral of this move precludes the implementation of these important plans. c. Comouter Fr_o=•t Upon completion of the CMS Billing Units reorganization, a proposal will be prepared for the centralization of computer input. Proper hand-Zing of this critical area is vital to im- proving the accuracy of the output- d. Follow-Up Project Approval has been received to hire four temporary clerks to begin the Follow-Up Project—a six-month pilot project designed to dete-r=1:e the number of permanent personnel required (now estimated as 8) to perform this important revenue-producing fur_ct=or__ Two clerks have been hired and are working; However, due to lack of work space, the remaining two positions cannot be fillsd_ An early indicator of the value of this function is she fact that, to date, one temporary clerk working on fol?ow-up for two and a half weeks has been able to research two months of the Claims Not Submitted portion of the Claims. Status Report for Medi-Cal. An additional $5,856 in claims has been located and processed. Payment of $1,374.00 has already been received on one inpatient claim-processed by this clerk. 0.0 I8 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 4 Page 3 e. Transfer of Clerical Positions and Desk Audit Due to transfer of functions, four positions In Auditor- Controller are earmarked for transfer to CMS. Prior to implementation of transfers, CMS has requested a desk audit by Civil Service of the Patient Accounting Unit in the CMS Business Office to ensure a smooth transition and to avoid development of grievances. However, the desk audit will be based on the reorganized procedures and, therefore, cannot be conducted until the space requirements outlined in Item "b" above are made available. f. Invoice and Monthlu Statement A committee has been formed to work out details of combining the invoice and monthly statement. As soon as a decision can be reached on what items are to appear, Systems will initiate programming requests. g. Assignment of Accounts Assigmment of accounts will be made without exception,.using the present procedures. The current system recommends assign- ment at jam= -._ the fourth statement is written. The account then appears on the next assignment list. This list is cur- rently renewed by Central Collections and. accounts of - $1,000.00 or more are pulled for further research. The • processing is continued when research is complete--either assigned o= other payment arrangements are made. CMS will. take over t:he review procedure and follow the same method of handling the recommendations. • B. Eligibilitu az:d Patient Liability Functions I. E1igbilT_tg/Patient LiabMU Sub-Task Force In studyi~g the functions of patient eligibility and liability under r'ate--arise Fund, It became evident that a sub-task force was needed to work exclusively on these subjects in order to develop new or revised policies which are compatible both with the maximizing of revenue and equitable and humane relations with patients_ It was also evident that the assigned tasks of this sub-task force could not be accomplished by July 1, 1978, but that its work could and should continue after the initia- tion of EF operations. Accordingly, the joint Eligibility/ Liability sub-Task Force recommends approval of the work plan outlined below. 00 s ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 4 Page 4 2. Work Plan of Eligibility/Liability Sub-Task Force a. Target Date Target date for completion of tasks is the end of the first quarter of FY 1978-79. b. Eligibility and Liability Determination Completion of an eligibility policy and liability deter- mination that initiates a reasonable and payable-monthly- payment for all patients. Presently the liability of patients receiving mental health services is determined by the schedule set by the State Is.Uniform Method of Determining Ability to Pay (UMDAP), which is applied statewide. In 1975, the County, acknowledging the more , realistic schedule of UM.DAP, developed a revised policy to apply to the large share of costs established by. the ` Medi-Cal Program to encourage patients to apply for the program in order to enable the County to collect all _ costs incurred over the share of costs from Medi-Cal. This has resulted in added revenue. The difference be- tween the Medi--Cal share of costs and the U14DAP liability is a:.�_!:ed by the County. However, patients not eligible for Xedi--Cal who cannot afford the full cost of care are still being billed in full. This results in .issuing hundreds of uncollectable bills and a formidable accounts • receivable that is extremely costly to administer with lithe hope of obtaining offsetting revenue. T-he sub-TF will work toward extending the more realistic U1ID;L0 schedule to everyone who comes here as a patient wit'.- the rationale that experience has shown that people will attempt to pay when presented with a realistic bill but tend to pay nothing toward a bill which.ds far beyond their ability to pay. A change along the lines outlined above will ultimately inrolve a recommendation to the Board for a change in the current County Medical Care Eligibility Policy. c. N.or_thly Payment Plan The monthly payment plan applied to every patient will encourage fall pay patients to go through the eligibility process. Probably many of them will be eligible for hedi Cal and when the opportunity to explain"it is provided it will be more acceptable to them. This will mean additional 00780 RTTACHM M 4 Appendix 4 Page 5 revenue to the County. Those who are not eligible for Medi-Cal will have a monthly payment offered them which Is so much more attractive than the fee-for-service full bill that they will be receptive to the program and make the reasonable payment rather than paying nothing at all. This method of payment removes medical care from the aura of a welfare program and equates it with a health insurance plan. The sub-TF will continue to examine the feasibility of a method of payment that requires no monthly bill, thus- saving postage, processing, complaints, and follow-up-* d. A Hill-Burton Charitable Fund Under EF, the sub-TF is considering a Sill-Burton Chaxi- table Fund to be utilized in paying for the cost of care. of patients who cannot pay their share of cost under the Medi-Cal program and those who do not qualify for Medi-Cal but still cannot pay any portion of their cost of care. This would provide a method of dispensing with unpayable amounts without going through the expensive billing, col --coons, referral to a private collection agency, and f:.-.ally to a write-off procedure. 1) Patients would be identified as eligible for the Hill-Burton Charitable Fund by the EW prior to re- ceiving care or following a diagnosis which would influence the decision. 2) Prnen the eligibility worker and her supervisor are in doubt that the justification is sufficient to refer the patient to the Charitable Fund, they will submit the case to the Patient Relations Committee for final decision. e. Memorandum of Agreement Between CMS and CMSE (Social Se_-.rice D_fZi! sent The completion of a Memorandum of Agreement between County Medical Services Eligibility (SSD) and County Medical Services clearly delineating the duties and responsibili- ties of each departrent. Eligibility and original liability determination will be a responsibility of CAIS£, but later, when the liability is'clearly related to the medical con- dition of the patient, the determinatign will be a respon- sibility of Medical Services. Policy decisions .involving provision of medical services to illegal aliens and other groups not eligible for Medi-Cal will be the responsibility of Medical Services. 00"181 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 4 Page 6 f. Patient Support Services The sub-TF will examine the role of the Patient Support Services Coordinator in working with Reception, Financial Clearance Unit, Eligibillty, Business Office, and CHAS in an effort to dispense with long waiting lines for patients at all CMS locations. Since the present system impacts on billing, collections, and eligibility, it must be considered In relation to the EF. The long waits standing in lines discourages patients from seeking care at CHS facilities. This affects revenue and continuity of care, both of which are of concern to EF. .fit also Interferes with patients' having easy access to primary care and discourages enrollments in the Key Plan. .These problems need solution to assure the success of EF and the acceptance of the philosophy as expressed in Dr. Paul O'Rourke's recent report to the Board of Supervisors. 0 ATTACHMSMT 4 Appendix 5 PURCHASING SERVICES The interdepartmental Purchasing Task Force (representatives of Human Resources Agency, Auditor/Controller, and County Medical Services) has agreed jointly to the following provisions and recommends that these provisions be approved for the conduct of County Medical Serviced purchasing functions under Enterprise Fund: 1. CMS will implement a Materials Management Program (MMP) to include: a. A process for acquisition of supplies and equipment,• b. Development and management of a coordinated inventory control system. c. Development of a system for an equipment replacement program. 2. Materials Management Coordinator (I-&C) will be a CMS employee and will act as liaison to the purchasing function of Auditor/ Controller (A/C). Purchasing needs of CMS will flow through. MP:C and to A/C purchasing support. ?. Zhe purchasing function is responsible to the A/C and will deter- mine that legal and Ethical requirements are practiced. 4. A/C agrees to provide: a. On-site buyer personnel with appropriate authority to exerese purchasing function, b. An on site buyer for 2 hours/day for 10 hours/week, This time allocation will be evaluated after a trial period, at which time the commitment will be renegotiated. 5. CKS agrees: a. To provide the on-site buyer with clerical support. b. The on-site buyer will perform purchasing functions. 6. A/C and CUS agree jointly to: a. Develop expeditious purchasing procedures to meet the needs of CMS. b. Develop, procedurize, and implement the NHP with cooperation between MMC and A/C representatives. 00'783 c• C � ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 5 Page 2 The following outline sets forth the essential elements of County Medical Services Materials Management Program (MMP) under Enterprise Fund: The Materials Management Program is designed to provide the managers within the department with guidance and assistance in carrying out their responsibilities in the area of: acquisition of materials, inventory control, equipment replacement, and maintenance. The Materials Management Program is a major element of the Administrative Program of the department and will be a line responsibility of the Admini- strator. The program will be managed by the Materials Management-toordina- tor, who will report directly to the CMS Administrator. The major elements of the Materials Management Program are: I. Process for acquisition of supplies and equipment. II. Management of a coordinated inventory control system. III. Control of equipment replacement program. IV. Coordination of equipment maintenance program. The Materials Management Coordinator (MMC) is the Medical Services,Depart- ment employee responsible for providing liaison with'the purchasing fund_=on of the. Auditor/Controller's office. Purchasing support will function through the 11!C to meet the purchasing needs of CMS. Functions of the Materials Management Program which must be procedurized: I. Acquisition Process: A. Selection of Products 1. Irvertory items by MMC (review and audit). 2. Non_rvertory items by Svc Manager in consultation with MMC. 3. Emergency items by Svc Manager and/or MINC, dependent on dollar limitation. B. Requisition Process 1. Regular repetitive needs (inventory controlled). 2. Special items (noninventory). 3. Emergency needs. 4. Forms. C. Ordering Process 1. Orders with Bid Requirements. a) Bid Process. b) Order Preparation. 1) New P.O. 2) Release against Blanket P.O. 00"181 ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 5 Page 3 2. Orders not Requiring Bid a) Actions of CMS Employees. 2) Replenish 3:nvent:ory. b) Actions of Assigned Purchasing Support. D. Receiving Process 1. Accurate pricing knowledge at time of receipt of material. 2. Errors in shipment or price. 3. Partial receipt problem. E. Invoice Payment Process 1. Invoice review.and approval within. CMS. 2. Invoice payment process. a) Payment of partial; II. Inventory Control Systems s- A. Establish Levels of Stock to be Retained in Inventory. 1. Minimum level/reorder point. 2. Cost-effective level. 3. Maxim= =_7e1. B. Process for Inventory Entries. 1. Receipt of material into inventory. a) New inventory item. b) Existing inventoxy'item. 2. Issue of inventory items. C. Inventory-Management Reports. 1. Internal reports within CMS. 2. Reports to Auditor/Controller, D. Control of Access to the Area Housing the Inventory Items. I. During regular operating hours, 2. During off hours. 223'. Equipment Replacement Program A. Participation of Cl�'.S in the Depreciation Establishment Process. B. Preparation of Budget Requests for Needed Replacements. C. Participation of Accounting Section in MMP, 00 78 - ..:. ... .:::.._�....,-..-...«.,... ... ..... ..n. ...+�+w..:.wv .Vii. :•-... .v........;.. 4 - ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 5 Page 4 ITT. Equipment Maintenance Program. A. Interaction with Contractors Providing Service. B. Interaction within CMS and•Other County Departments.. 00 i8 ATTACOffflT 4 Appendix 6 CONTRACTS The interdepartmental Contracts Task Force recommends approval of the transfer of the processing and control of all County Medical Services contracts to the CMS Contracts Unit: on implementation of Enterprise Fund and in accordance with the following policies: 1. Time Frame a. If the required contracts unit staff is filled from*the outside by untrained workers, a thirty-day period will be utilized for training and orientation to become operational. b. If the required contracts unit staff is filled from existing staff transferred to CMS with the requisite skills, a two-week orientation period will be utilized to become operational. c. During the sixty-day period from June I to July 31; CMS is developing an operational plan for the Contracts Unit. 2. Contracts operational Procedures The Task Force has develQppd detaii.ed operational procedures to carry out the fr.%-.ct_-7ons of a County Medical Services Contracts Processing ZT-it and is staffing these procedures with other major departments, to include County Counsel and the Human Resources Agency. The final procedures manual will encompass,both inter- and intradepartmental operational requirements for the timely processing of contracts by the County Yleedlcall Services Unit with provision for clearly- delineated time frames for the major steps and a graphic flow-chart. 00787 t• � �, ATTACffiff.IrT 4 Appendix 7 BUILDING AND MAINTEPIANCE SERVICES The interdepartmental Building and Maintenance Task Force has developed a Memorandum of Agreement between Medical Services Department and Public Works Department for the conduct of building and maintenance functions for County Medical Services under Enterprise Fund. The Memorandum of Agreement and its enclosures have.been concurred in for implementation under Enterprise Fund by the heads of both departments andare attached:- hereto in draft. Itis recommended that the Memorandum of Agreement be ,approved for imple mentation under EF. Upon implementation of the Memorandum of Agreement, Hospital Environmental Services plans to change the following positions to assure better admini- stration and supervision for evening coverage and better compliance with Title 22 and J.C.A.H. for all of Medical Services: 1. Existing position of one Housekeeping Supervisor to Assistant- __ Hospital Environmental Services Manager, 2. Existing position of one Intermediate Typist Clerk to-Senior Clerk. • 3. Three existingr positions of Institutional Services Workers to Workir_g Leadneersons for East, West, and Central County. a ATTLACE�fz-1IT: Memorandum of Agreement, with enclosures L DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT This memorandum of agreement supercedes all other agreements and becomes effective on The following policies are mutually agreed to with regard to the operation and maintenance of the County Medical Services facilities: a. Public Works responsibilities (see enclosure #1). . b. Medical Services Department responsibilities (see eneldsure #1' and i12). c. Public Works operating personnel as required will be provided for on-site support. d. A statement will be generated monthly Within the present County Financial Accounting System for services -rendered. e.g., Plant Acquisition Report and Work Authorization Detail by Requester Report. Any extensive Work to be accomplished_ Will be discussed with County Medical Services, Health Service Administrator, III, to determine the availability of funds. e. Public Worcs will estimate the total annual cost of maintenance, renovation and alteration necessary for the operation of County Medical Services and shall provide an estimate of cost for budgetary purposes. Costs will reflect time and material. f. The Public Works Department agrees to transfer four custodial positions and two gardener positions to County Medical- Services. The timins of the transfers shall be as mutually agreed upon in order to provide the least disruption to departments and existing employees. g. The Public Works Department agrees to transfer such equipment for custodial and gardening operations as is surplus to Public Works operations. DATED: Enclosures: 1. Joint Service Agreement Procedures Betyeen Public Works and County Medical Services 2. Medical Services Bio-Medical Equipment Responsibilities 00789 . DRAFT r ' JOINT SERVICE AGREEMENT PROCEDURES BETWEEN PUBLIC WORKS AND COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES 1. Public Works will administer and direct programs to maintain buildings and equipment, (excluding bio-medical), and to procure or generate all utilities and their distribution systems in consultation and agreement with Medical Services to include: a. Upkeep, repair and renovations of buildings and that. equipment not classified as bio-medical. b. Planning, programming and accomplishing maintenance, repair and improvements of building, structure, roads, parking lots, drainage systems, utilities, hospital machinery using pressure steam; all electrical system and ancillary equipment, including refrigeration, air-handling equipment, motors and wiring, carpentry, painting, plumbing, plasi.-ring-masonry, welding, minor repair and fabrication and incendiary operation. 2. Public Works will coordinate above activities with other departments and outside agencies. R 3. Public Works will plan and recommend development of physical facilities in consultation and coordination with Medical Services for budget purposes_ 4. Public Works will review and recommend approval of plans for construction to CMS, CAO, and Board of Supervisors as appropriate. 5. Public Works will advise Medical Services on structural changes and additions or modifications to buildings, as needed to maintain structural integrity. 6. Public Works will confer on estimated budget with Medical Services, Health Service Administrator, III, for all Medical Services plant facilities as required by County policies. o 1 Enclosure 1 Ov~/ Gin 7. Public Works will establish and administer a preventive maintenance b program, excluding bio-medical equipment. 8. Public Works will consult and coordinate with Medical Services on cost analysis and work schedules, where appropriate. 9. Public Works will maintain records of machine and equipment repairs in accordance with appropriate codes, directives and standards which shall be made available to Medical Services. 10. Public Works will appoint Fire Marshall and Deputy to supervise the . Hospital Brigade on Hospital grounds in accordance with Annex D. Fire Control Plan (Redstone), Contra Costa County Medical Disaster Plan. 11. Public Works representative, as designated by the Public Works Director, will be on call to attend Administrative Staff meetings to. discuss.Hospital policies, assist in their development and interpret these poTicies to the !Maintenance Staff. 12. County Medical Services, under the direction of Hospital Environmental Services Manager, will administer and direct programs as follows: a. Maintain the grounds and housekeeping service at County Hospital . , b. Maintain the grounds and housekeeping service for George Miller East and George Miller West. c. Maintain the housekeeping service for Richmond Outpatient and Pittsburg Outpatient Clinics. d. Provide the administration of all custodial, alarm, pool maintenance, and trash contracts for leased buildings occupied totally by County Medical Services. Q 00`193 Enclosure 1 Page 2 DRAFT • MEDICAL SERVICES BIO-MEDICAL EQUIPMENT RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Preventive Maintenance a. Cleaning b. Adjustment c. Lubrication d. Minor repairs e. Functional checks 2. Scheduled services correlated With utilization rate of equipment. 3. Service program based on recommendation of Intersociety Commission Report and other authorities. 4. Emergency repair service. S. Documentation of all repairs. 6. Electrical safety inspections. a. Case leakage b. Lead leakage c. Lead isolation d. Alar-- operation e. Visual inspection f. Electrical system groundings g. Receptacle polarity h. Receptacle tension i. Detailed measurements 7. Bio-medical instrumentation calibration. S. Incoming equipment inspection. 9. In-service training for user-operator and building- maintenance personnel. Enclosure #2 00 ! Q9 c ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 8 v LEGAL SERVICES The following outlines the basic unresolved issues developed in the inter- departmental Legal Task Force: - 1. Agreed Dpon by Joint Task. Force One additional full-time legal counsel to supplement legal services currently provided to Medical Services from County Counsel's office. 2. Medical Services Position One additional senior legal counsel with on-site presence as required by Medical Services, to be paid for out of the Enterprise Fund andto be totally dedicated to Medical Services problems, to specialize in health-care law, not to be subject to County Counsel rotation assign- ment without Medical Services agreement,, and to be an employee of the County Counsel's office. 3. County Counsel's Position County Counsel nonconcurs with: a. Full dedication_ of additional staff. b. On-site assign-maZt at Medical Services. c. Xonsotation without concurrence of Medical Services. 3'n further elaboration of the Medical Services position, the CMS members of the joint Task Force developed the attached proposed agreement between County Counsel and Medical Services Department. This proposed agreement would provide the mr-+' +rn level of legal support necessary for effective operations under Enterprise Fund. It is recommended that the Board urge County Counsel to reconsider his nonconcurrence and to negotiate with Medical Services on the basis of the proposed agreement. ATITACO-rZEWi 00793 0 D RA FT May 24, .S AGREEMENT BET14EEN COUNTY COUMSEL AW MEDICAL SERVICES FOR PROVISION OF LEGAL SUPPORT TO EUTERPRISE HAD County Counsel Agrees: 1. To provide to County Medical Services, under Enterprise Fund, one additional Deputy County Counsel (senior level) with on-site presence as detem.ined by Medical Services_ 2. This position will develop and provide expertise inftealth=care lair and coordinate services currently provided by County Counsel. (70 - Et?n of Rosemary Mattosian's time plus additional special assignments by other Deputy County Counsel.) 3. To provide space as required for consultation, supervision 'and access to the law library and other resources_ 4. New position will not be subject to rotation of ass.ignmentsiwithin' County Counsel 's office. Supplemental. County Counsel staff will be assigned by County Counsel as required. , County Madical Services Agrees: Y T_ To accept charges for additional costs•associated with provision of 'Chase services. 2. Provide on-site space for position- 3. Provide clerical support, equipment and space_ Jointly, County Counsel and Medical Services Agree 1 . To select Deputy County Counsel for neer position. 2. !annually evaluate legal services. provided under this ,agreement. 3. That this doc=ent becomes effective with inception of the Enterprise FuM. _ ngreed to znis date_ County Counse "Iedical Director 00 794 ' n ATTACFI�NT 4 Appendix 9 PERSONNEL SERVICES The interdepartmental Personnel Task Force has agreed to the attached Civil Service/Countcj Medical Services Interdepartmental Agreement Regar- ding Personnel Services Under an Enterprise Farad. Although the attached agreement provides CMS with the capability to control numbers of person- nel and classifications under an Enterprise Fund, CMS has remained concerned that the agreement does not spell out the provisions of the.relationship between CMS and the Human Resources Agency with regard to personnel matters. In order to alleviate the concerns of CM5 with regard to relationships with HRA in personnel matters, the Director, Human Resources Agency, out- lined his position in a memorandum to the Medical Director, dated May 26, 1978, subject: Appointing Authority for Medical. Services Positions. The May 26, 1978, memorandum is quoted in its entirety below: "In Dr. Girtman's memo to me dated May 23, 1978, he suggested that the. appointing authority problem which has been raised as, a part of the Enterprise Fund Task Force effort could be re- solved by having we limit my "appointing authority" responsi- bility to the Medi- 7 Director and, in turn, delegating to him he ap?oinTing auc ority responsibility for all other positions in Medical Services. "It is clear from a practical point of view that I cannot literal- ly exercise the authority to individually and personally appoint every employee in the Medical Services Department, or any of the other de5art_-_ents in the Agency. The fact remains that Board Resolution i:o_ 449 dated June 10, 1975, specifies that I am legally the appointing authority for all offices and posi- tions in the Age=cy. Until the Board revises that Resolution, Z will remain lega22y responsible as the appointing authority. However, from a practical point of view, I have delegated to you the autho;ii.-g to act on my behalf in hiring all other em- ployees in tie Medical Services Department.. This arrangement has worked well and should be continued unless and until the Board of Supervisors redefines my appointing authority. "I am therefore formally delegating to you the responsibility to hire employees in the Medical Services Department. Since this does not change my legal responsibility as the appointing autho- rity, I continue to want to be involved in the firing of any employee and in confirming any major disciplinary actions short of firing. • "I hope that this memo will assist in resolving the problem in this area in relation to the Enterprise Fuad." 0079) 1. ATTACHMENT 4 Appendix 9 Page 2 The Medical Director has accepted the May 26, 1978, memorandum, quoted above, as satisfactory to alleviate CMS, concerns in personnel matters under a_z Enterprise Fund_ Although the Department Heads of Civil Service and County Medical Ser- vicesr_ave not formally signed the attached agreement, it expected that they will do so on implementation of Enterprise Fund, Accordingly, it is recommended that the attached interdepartmental,agree trent be approved with the understanding that it will be carried out-under- Enterprise Fund in accordance with the provisions of the Human Resources, . Director's Memorandum of May 26, 1978. ATzACa'!': Civil Service/County Medical Services Interdepartmental' Agreement Regarding Personnel Services Under an Enterprise Fund i r • 00 t D R A F T CS AND CMS INTERDEPARTMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING CMS PERSONNEL SERVICES U11DER AN ENTERPRISE FUND PREA_?,!BLE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE DEPARTMENT AND COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES HAT/E MET PERIODICALLY AND DISCUSSED ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS AGREEMENT. THE PA.P.TI£S HAVE EXCHANGED IDEAS FREELY IN AN ATMOSPHERE OF COOPERATION AND OPEN CO.%WNICATION. IN THIS SPIRIT, THE BLOW-LISTED PROVISIONS CON- STITUTE OUR MUTUAL AGREEMENT ON THE MATTERS HEREIN DESCRIBED. 1. There are certain merit system classifications unique to CMS and certain classifications used by CMS but used by other departments r that may be processed to final classification action with only 1i=ited CS involvement. These are listed on Attachment A. 2. CS classification division will process classification actions invol- ving classes not shown on Attachment A as shown below: a. For the purpose of processing P3001s, a 30-day turnaround In the Civil Service Department is a goal or objective. Possible attain- rent of this 30-day turnaround goal is absolutely conditional on (1) the Classification and Pay Division receiving Board of Super- visors' approval to increase its staff analyst complement'froiri 5 Personnel Analysts to 6 Personnel Analysts and (2) P300's re- ce_v_c from Ch'S te_ng fully completed and accompanied by appro- priate organization chart(s) and classification questionnaire(s). Even with the addition of staff, the logistics involving Civil Service Cortrri.ssion approval of classification matters, including the often lengthy delay caused by objections from public employee organizations, etc., prohibits any guarantee of a 30-day turna- round. b. :chile Civil Sex7ice will request one additional Analyst position by way o_ a budget adjustment for the Classification and Pay Division--t�;=s bringing the division requests from 2 Personnel Pralysts to 3 Personnel Analysts funding for the third position will be provided by County Medical Services. c. Should additional staff be approved by the Board of Supervisors for the Classification and Pay Division but fall short of the anticipated 3 staff positions, the division will still endeavor to provide expeditious classification service to County Medical Services. d. Insofar as classification actions that are, processed without classification audit for Medical Services (based on the list of gasses listed on Attachment A), said processing does not abrogate Civil Service Commission jurisdiction or preclude Civil Service staff from pre-auditing or post.-auditing said classification actions as may be necessary. It is understood by the parties that a P300 will still be required to process classification actions listed on Attachment A. . 0019`1 v . - 2 - 3. CS Recruiting and Selection Division will process CMS requests for examinations as shown below: a. Structural considerations in the regular examination process dic- tate minimum turnaround times which can only be achieved if all steps are unexceptional_ Minimum times from receipt of request in the Civil Service Department to promulgation of an employment list are 60 days for an oral only examination and 95 days for a written and oral examination. The logistical difficulties identified in 2(a) above also apply here. b. Absolutely conditional upon the Board of Supervisorss authorize tion of two additional full-time Personnel Analyst positions for the Recruitment and Selection Division to meet other existing workload requirements and with the net addition of one full-time Personnel Analyst subverted by County Medical Services to the Recruitment and Selection Division, average turnaround times can be reduced from their current levels which have been approximately double the minimum times listed. The minimum times would serve as goals or objectives. c. No estimates can realistically be made for increased turnaround times of individual examinations which may result from candidate appeals ander Civil Service Com-m'ssion Rules or intervention - by Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation under the Croskrey vs. County Consent Decree. d. Insofar as the recruitment and Selection Division has and will endeavor to provide expeditious service to CMS, such attempts will not i..frirge upon the Division's prerogative to utilize procedures w�+,ch are most consistent with valid selection prac- tice and ecual employment objectives. In the event that changes or delays in processing occur for requested classification or examination matters, CMS and CS personnel shall com- *nicate in a timely manner so that contingency plans may be discussed, and an effort wi_:l be made to work out a mutually acceptable agreement regarding what should be done on each individual case. Date /s/ /s/ Director, Director, Civil Service Department Medical Services Department ATTACENE:1T A: Listing of Classes Used Almost Exclusively by CY.S that May Be-Processed to Final Action with Limited. CS Classification Involvement 00 4(1Q �.�. A D R A F T ATTACHMENT A LISTING OF CLASSES USED ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY BY CMS THAT MAY BE PROCESSED TO FINAL ACTION WITH LIMITED CS CLASSIFICATION INVOLVEMENT Agreement reached on: Pharmacist I Medical Transcriber Pharmacy Assistant ! - Recreation Therapist Dietitian` Gardener Clinical Lab Technologist Window-Washer Tissue Technician Staff-Nurse' IT Cclassified and project) Cytology Technologist Therapist Aide Dental Assistant Health Care Counselor II Diagnostic Radiological Technologist Health Care Counselor I Medical Records Technician Institutional Service Worker II Medical Records Librarian Institutional Service Worker I Surgical Nurse Cook's Assistant Staff Nurse I (classified and project) Family Nurse Practitioner Intern (project) Licensed Vocational Nurse (classified Social Rehabilitation Assistant (project) and project) Exempt Staff Resident Physician •I Hospital Attendant (classified and Exempt Staff Resident Physician II project) Exempt Staff Resident Physician III Central Supply Technician Exempt Medical Staff Physician Soecial Qualifications :corker Exempt Medical Staff Dentist Pharmacist Trainee Exempt Medical Staff Podiatrist Occupational Therapist Exempt Medical Staff Optometrist Physical Therapist Family Nurse Practitioner 0�X99 ATTACHMENT A J 1, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.. State of California June 27 . 19 78 In the Matter of Appeal of The Hofmann Company, Applicant, from County Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Map of Subdivision 5353, Byron Area. Dominion Properties, Owner. WHEREAS on the 13th day of June, 1978, the County Planning Commission approved with conditions the tentative map of Subdivision 5353, Byron area, filed by The Hofmann Company; WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, The Hofmann Company filed with this Board an appeal from condition no. 8 of said conditions of approval; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, County Administration Building, Martinez, California, on' Tuesday, the 25th day of 'July, 1978 at 1:30 p.m. and the Clerk is directed to publish notice of hearing, pursuant to code requirements. PASSED by the Board on Jume 27, 1978. i • i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: The Hofmann Company Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Dominion Properties Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27th day of June j 19 78 Names Provided by Planning BY rJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk �;7' paputy Clark bbie 'errez 00800 H-24 4/77 15m RECEIVEDC5 , ( ,• w�, 1 ill CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JUN 1978 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ' ONT ACO. B NOW I TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: June 21 , 1978 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus SUBJECT: APPEAL: Subdivision 5353 Director of Planni Discovery Bay (Byron area) APPLICANT: The Hofmann Company, P. 0. Box 907, Concord. OWNER: Dominion Properties, Rt.2, Box D-250,- Byron. ENGINEER: Simpkins Associates, 408-A Tama] Vista Blvd., Corte Madera. APPELLANT: The Hofmann Company (applicant). PUBLIC HEARINGS: June 13, 1978, County Planning Commission. DECISION: Approved. APPEAL FILED: June 15, 1978• The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: The Hofmann Company Dominion Properties P. 0. Box 907 Rt. 2, Box D-250 Concord, Calif. 94522 Byron, Calif. 94514 Simpkins Associates Public Works Dept. , Land Development 408-A Tamal Vista Blvd. Corte Madera, Calif. 94925 Buildi.ng, lnspection Department , Attachments: Letter of Appeal , Planning Department Acknowledgement, Minutes, Staff Report, flap, EIR. AAD: Isw cc - Subdivision 5353 �ll�V1 7keofmann BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS HCOMPANY 1035 DETROIT AVE. P.O.Box 907 CONCORD.CA.94522- TELEPHONE 4522TELEPHONE 682-4830(Area Code 415) June 14 , 1978 r c` _ ? Z;; m Mr. Anthony A. Dehaesus - •. :;^, Planning Director Contra Costa County • ' v ' � County Administration Building _ P. 0. Box 951 z r: Martinez, California 94553 � •vo Reference: Subdivision 5353 Dear Mr. Dehaesus; Enclosed is our check in the amount of $100.00 to cover the fee for appeal to the Board of Supervisors of Item 8 of the Conditions for Approval, Subdivision 5353; in`the ' area of Discovery Bay. I want to thank you and your staff for the excellent coop- eration in getting this subdivision before the Planning Commission. Mr. Halverson was extremely cooperative and the time span was short of miraculous. We agree to the Conditions of Approval by the Planning Commission with the exception of Item S; this condition was agreed to by the previous developer only because they, were not aware of what they agreeing to. They were from out of state, and we believe they agreed simply to buy zoning and had no intention of ever complying with these conditions. They are no longer the developer; we are, and we find it impossible to comply with Item 8. If Highway 4 is con- structed in compliance with these Conditions of Approval, it will not be done by the developer. We respectfully request that this matter be submitted to the Board of Supervisors at the earliest convenience in order to estab-- lish whether or not we have a subdivision.-- Sincerely, ubdivision.Sincerely, THE HUMAN COMPANY �7� K. H. � mann ��U�� Pre i ent i4 ttun:dd E. Anderton Cminly Arlrntrti slralion flutltltncr.Ninth Wrnrr �O`•t�I L I' (1 (lox r►•r, 1 Wdlimm V.W.,Uno - COLO ��y PL•.r•.u,t 11.11 Vur•(:h.nrn,.m titarlinta•(:;tldulni;► �l•15�3 Albert It.Compaglia h1.0 1 incl An,hony A.Dehaesus Director of Planning ' W,16am L.hldm,o Phone: 372-2091 " Carolyn D. Phillips Rodeo Jack Stoddard rlichnu,nd June 16 1978, Andrew H. Young Alamo 0 K. H. Hofmann The Hofmann Company 1035 Detroit Avenue Concord,. California Dear Mr. Hofmann: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal , dated June 14, 1978, and the $100.00 filing fee for Subdivision 5353`, which was approved by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 13, 1978. Your appeal is being transmitted to the Board of Supervisors. The Board will notify you as soon as a hearing date is scheduled. Should you have any questions relative to the above information, please feel free- to contact us. Sincerely yours, Anthony A. Dehaesus Director of Planging Norman L. Halverson Chief, Subdivision Administration NLH: isw cc - Supervisor Hasseltine ' Dominion Properties Simpkins Assoc. Public Works, Land Dev. Building Inspection 00803 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION 5353 (Owner: Dominion Properties, Incorporated) A request for approval of a tentative map to subdivide 228 acres into 349 lots in a Plan- ned Unit District (P-1). Subject property is located at the extension of Drakes Place, Starboard Place and Pebble Lane, in Discovery Bay in the Byron _ area. (CT 3040) On June 13, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. having been fixed as the time- for hearing on this item, the meeting was declared open by the Chairman. The staff explained the proposal as being a part of the Planned Unit Develop- ment for Discovery Bay, which included the 1780 acres north of State-Highway 4. The Planned Unit Development included recreation, commercial , multiple family, schools and utilities. The conditions of approval reflect the conditions of approval of the Final Development Plan (LUP 3014-74). Mr. Ron Simpkins, engineer, appeared representing the applicant. He questioned Condition 1#17 and indicated that he thought. the minimum floor elevation should be 9.5 and not 10.5 U.S.G.S. Datum. Mr. Bill Grey, Department of Public Works, announced that the correct elevation should be 9.5 U.S.G.S. Datum. No one appeared in opposition. Upon the MOTION of Commissioner Compaglia, SECONDED by Commissioner Milano , Subdivision 5353 was approved, subject to staff conditions (Exhibit "A" attached) by the following vote on June 13, 1978- AYES: Commissioners - Compagli.a, Milano, Walton, Young, Phillips, Stoddard, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. OWNER: Dominion Properties APPLICATION N0. Subdivision 5353 ATTEST: `�� ZC ���'�•/��� ASSESSOR'S Norman L. Halverson PARCEL NO. 11-25O-Por. 18 Chief, Subdivision Administration 00804 Exhibit "A" . SUBDIVISION 5353 - CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. This approval is based upon the tentative map dated received by the Planning Department May 25, 1978. 2. Comply with the final conditions of approval for Development Plan 3014-74. 3. The subdivision shall conform to the provisions in Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. Any variance therefrom must be specifically applied for and shall not be allowed unless listed on the Planning Commission's. condi- tional approval statement. 4. In accordance with the provisions in Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be conveyed to Contra Costa County for road purposes shall consent to the dedication or deeding of the right-of-way. S. All utility transmission, distribution and service facilities shall be installed underground. (Ordinance Code Chapter 96-10) 6. The minimum grade for curbs on all streets shall be 1%. ' ,(Ordinance Code Section 98-6.004) 7. Traffic control signs, stop signs, centerline striping and pavement markings at all stop signs will be required. These details shall be shown on the improvement plans_ The subdivider's engineer will be advised by the Public Works Department of the various signs, striping and pavement markings . required when the improvement plans are submitted for review. 8. Street lights, shall be installed on -all streets and the entire subdivision shall be annexed to County Service Area M-8 for the maintenance and opera- tion of the street lights. (Ordinance Code Chapter 96-6) 9. Sidewalks shall be constructed on all streets. (Ordinance Code Chapter , 96-8) 10. No mailboxes will be permitted within the sidewalk, path or trail area. The placement of mailboxes within the right-of-way shall conform to current standards of the Public Works Department. The subdivider is advised to contact the Postal Service and find a satisfactory arrangement for mail delivery, e.g. , request, in writing, delivery to individual or grouped mailboxes behind the sidewalks. 11. Any section of the storm drainage system which conveys .storm water to which the public streets contribute flow shall be installed in a dedicated drainage easement. 12.- Although the storm drainage system is shown in some detail, comment on the z. system will be made when the improvement plans are submitted for review. 13. The subject subdivision is located next to Indian Slough which is defined by the Department of Fish and Game as a natural watercourse on the largest scale U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Map most recently � gbe& Conditions of Approval - Subdivision 5353 Page 2 14. The necessary notifications shall be filed with, and permits obtained from, the State Reclamation Board, the Department of the Army; Reclama- tion District 800 and/or any other agency having jurisdiction over the levees or waterways before doing- any work that may affect the levees or waterways. 15. Reclamation District 800 shall be the agency responsible for the maintenance of the levees and lagoons. 16. The top of curb elevations shall be no lower than 9.5 U.S.G.D. Datum. 17. The finished floor elevations of proposed buildings shall be no lower than 9.5 U.S.G.S. Datum. 18. Adequate bank protection shall be provided on all lots on Indian Slough and Indian Bay. The bank protection shall be shown on the grading plans and shall be subject to review by the Public Works Department, Land Development Division. 19. Slope easements for maintenance of the bank slopes shall be'dedicated to the satisfaction of Reclamation District 800. 20. The transition from a 40-foot street in a 60-foot right-of-way to a36-foot street in a 56-foot right-of-way shall take place in the first 50 feet of Discovery Bay Boulevard within the subdivision. 21. The Final Map for Subdivision 5353" shall not be recorded •until: A. On-site work has begun on the expansion of the water supply facilities as provided in Article 2.D. of the Agreement between the developer of Subdivision 4687 and Sanitation District No. 19. B. The developer of Subdivision 4687 has submitted a comprehensive plan acceptable to the District as provided in Article 14.B of the Agreement between the developer of Subdivision 4687 and Sanitation District No. 19. C. If the comprehensive plan prepared pursuant to 2 above indicated that the existing sewage facilities are not adequate to serve Subdivision 5353 and all other existing and/or approved subdivisions within Sanita- tion District No. 19 (Discovery Bay development)_then the developer shall construct'adequate sewage facilities (acceptable to Sanitation District No. 19) to serve this subdivision. BT:dh 6/13/78 00806 Planning DepartmentContra Pla�ngCO —s Andrew H.Young st Alamo .Chairman County Administration Building.North Wing d wiulsm l,Ixll,no , P.O. Box 951 ��� Pittsburg—Vice Charman Martinez.California 94553 Donald E.Anderson Moraga Anthony A.Dehasws Director of Planning Albert R_ComPa2l1a Martinez Phone: 372-2024 Rlchsrd J.Jehafl sobrante Jack Sloddard May 30, 1978 Richmond William V.Walton III Pleasant Hill Dominion Properties Rt. 2, Box D-250 Byron, California 94514 Dear Applicant: The Contra Costa County Planning Department has completed an initial study of the environmental si�gqnrtificance of the project represented by your pending application bearing County File Number �ZB.5353 , In conformance with Contra Costa County Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) it has been determined that your project falls within-the following category: (ZAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) IS NOT REQUIRED. -, ( ) 'The project is categorically exempt(Class ). (vl'o'The CEM requirements are accommodated by the El previously prepared for 3014" 94" ( ) A sta:amsrn that an EiR:s not required (Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance) has been filed try the Planning Department(unless appealed). ( ) Other: ( ) AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS REQUIRED. ( ) To expedite EIR preparation additional information concerning the project must be submitted.To satisfy this requirement the attached questionnaire should be completed and returned to the Planning Department. , ( ) The complexity of your project requires your submission of additional special reports or information (as' outlined on the attached sheet) (which will be outlined in a forthcoming letter). ( ) Due to the scope and complexity of your project,a consultant will be hired to prepare the environmental impact report. This procedure (is explained on the attached sheet) (will be explained in a forthcoming letter). ( ) An additional fee of S is required to cover preparation of the environmental impact report. Please return the attached billing with payment. Preparation of the EIR cannot be started until the fee and additional information requested is received by the Planning Department. If you have questions concerning this determination, or desire additio al infoMBtion relative to environmental impact report regulations, please call 372-202�rand ask for CY.Ul l It-TW�n-- • r. 91 Sincerely yours, Anth y A. D esus Of1�t1 Dir or of Planning V U :• 1 AP 8 5/76 By: � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 1$ In the Matter of Appeal of Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Reinstein from, San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Amended Conditional Approval of Applica- tion for Minor Subdivision 226-77 Tassajara Area. WHEREAS on the 17th day of May, 1978 the San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission approved with amended conditions 'the application of Mr. Victor L. Lund, Jr. for Minor Subdivision 226-77, Tassajara area-;- and WHEREAS within the time allowed by law, Mr. .& Mrs. .Arthur Reinstein filed with this Board an appeal from said action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on. said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, ,County Administration Building, Martinez, •California, on. Tuesday, the, 25th day of July, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. and the Clerk is directed to publish notice of hearing, pursuant to code requirements. ` PASSED'by the Board on June 27 1978. s r I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc•• Mr. & Mrs. A. Reinstein Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. V. L. Lund, Jr. Supervisors Names Provided by Planning affixed this 2Ztb_day of Ttimm 192fL_ Director of Planning Public Works Director , Land Development - J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Building Inspection Deputy Cleric YCp Ro b%e G4tierrez 00808 H-24 4/77 15m RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1 f!� PLANNING DEPARTMENT in /q 1g7� J. R. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS I� ONT COSTACO. H . . Deputy TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: June 14, 1978 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesu SUBJECT: APPEAL - Minor Subdivision Director of Pianni 226-77 - Victor L. Lund, Jr. (Tassajara• Area) APPLICANT & OWNER: Victor L. Lund, Jr. , P. 0. Box 458, Pleasanton,- Ca. 94566 APPELLANT: Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Reinstein, P. 0. Box 2305, Livermore, Ca. 94550 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 12/12/77: San Ramon Valley Area Planning .Commission Continued to'2/8/78 due to Tassajara Study 2/ 8/78: San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Continued to 3/8/78 3/ 8/78: San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Continued to 4/19/78 4/19/78: San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Postponed to 5/3/78 5/ 3/78: San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Postponed to 5/17/78 5/17/78: San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission Approved with amended conditions DECISION: Approved with amended conditions APPEAL FILED: June 1 , 1978 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: Victor L. Lund, Jr. Public Works, Land Development Division P. 0. Box 458 Fourth Floor, Administration Building Pleasanton, Ca. 94566 Building Inspection Department Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Reinstein Third Floor, North Wing P. 0. Box 2305 (See attached list for additional names Livermore, Ca. 94550 and addresses) Mr. Harvey E. Bragdon 4 Barrie Way Mill Valley, Ca_ 94941 AAD:dh Attachments: Letter of Appeal , Planning Dept. Acknowledgment, Minutes, Staff Reports, EIR Declaration, Map. 00809 cc: M.S. 226-77 INTERESTED PERSONS - MINOR SUBDIVISION 226-77 Victor i Lu Jr. P. 0. Bo 8 Pleas; n , Ca. 94566 Mr. & 4s. hur Reinstein P. 0. Bo 305 Liverm Ca. 94550 Juleda Bettencourt 9055 Highland Road Livermore, Ca. 94550 Gordon Turner; Attorney ; P. 0. Box 110 Martinez, Ca. 94553 Mr. John Leonardini "- 2001 Victorine Road Livermore, Ca. 94550 Mr. Russel K. Schaeffer 3139 San Ramon Valley Boulevard ` San Ramon, California 94583 Mr. Brian Thiessen 177 Front Street Danville, Ca. 94526 f 00810 Planning DepartmentCOrll.►- San Ilnmun Vnlley Area f Planning Commission Andrew alr ndrew % Young County Administration Building.North Wing Chrnan P.O. Box 951 Juenira W. tiaravr County Vice Chairman O�}1 Martinez,California 94553 1 Ili/ . Linda P.Best Anthony A.Oehaesus Director of Planning E. Kennettnnin9 Jgnn Q.Meakin John W.Olander Phone: 372-2040 Nelson S.Wright June 7, 1978 Mr. & Mrs. Arthur Reinstein P. 0. Box 2305 Livermore, California 94550 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Reinstein: This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter of appeal dated June 1, 1978 and the $60.00; filing fee for Minor Subdivision 226-77 which Has approved with amended conditions. by the San` Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission on May 17, 1978. Your appeal is be -tzmnsmitted. to the Board of.Supervisors. The Board will notify you as soon as a hearing date is scheduled. Should you have questions relative to the above information, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely yours, Anth y A haesus Di a for o lann'ng r Iarvey B on Assist t Di ector, Current Planning HEB:dh cc-• M.S. 226-77 Victor J. Lund, Jr. Public 19orks, Land Dev. Building Inspection Dept. 6 Interested Persons 00811 P.O. Box 2305 RECEIVED Livermore, CA 94550 31 .May 1978 Contra Costa County �`� �' 1978 Board of Supervisors J. R. OLSSON County Courthouse CLERIC DOARO OiSUUP oISORS NI r Martinez, CA e • L _. Gentlemen: y Enclosedplease- find my- check for_ $60.00. T wish to appeal the Planning Comission' s decision on MS-226-77 which was acted upon May 17, 1978 tie now have trouble supplying a home and the stock from two ( 2) wells. This is our livelyhood. What assurance do we have that our water level will remain if additional wells are drilled? We consider this very serious-. The ranch -would her of no use to us if we cannot have water for our animals. We were under the impression you wanted to keep down urban encroachment as much as possible, why do you take a virgin piece of agricultural land and open it up to people who already have an income and jeapordize ours? Our taxes will go up as this agricultural land is developed and we will be "out of business" long before retirement age. There are a lot of spaces where development has already started that should be filled in before virgin land is opened to development. Sincerely, (Mr. ) Arthur Reinstein (Mrs. ) Arthur R instein 9 AR/br enclosure -� 00812 E RAMON VALLEY AREA PLANNING CO_SSION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA VICTOR L. LUND, JR. (Applicant) - GORDON R. AND KAREN L. RASMUSSEN (Owners), County File rMS 226-77: The applicant requests approval of a minor subdivision to divide 160 acres into 4 parcels. Subject property is described as follows: A 160 acre parcel fronting for 100 feet on the southeast side of Marcel Road, approximately 1 mile north . of Camino Tassajara, in the Tassajara area. (A-2) (CT 3551) On December 12, 1977 having been fixed as the time for hearing on this item, the meeting was declared open by the Chairman. Staff presented the staff report, described the project and explained the location. Staff recommended continuance as this is located in the Tassajara Study area. The following persons appeared to represent and in favor of the application and in opposition: VICTOR LUND, JR., 735 Pico, (P.O. Box 458), Pleasanton, CA wanted it resolved. There were no objectors present. COMMISSIONER MEAKIN commented he thought staff's comments were entirely appropriate and was strongly in favor of continuing this matter until. February. Upon the Motion of Commissioner MEAKIN, Seconded by Commissioner OLANDER, the applica- tion -was continued to February 6, 1978 by the following vote: . AYES: Commissioners - MEAKIN, OLANDER, BEST, KENNETT, YOUNG _ NOES: Commissioners - BUROW, WRIGHT MR. LUND stated his application was made in May and at that time there was no study. He purchased the property because he thought he would have no problems in'getting it . split. February 6th it could be continued again. Because of the length of time, he felt it only fair tc Near his a.-p—plication now. COMMISSIONER OLANDER stated he felt it was to the applicant's advantage to have it continued. It is surrounded by A-4 land and lacking a policy, it would probably be denied. _ BILL CARDINALE, 1020 El Capitan, Danville, CA expressed his opinion quite strongly p on application in the Tassajara area A-2 District being continued until the study is completed; felt it unfair to the applicants. Although it is not a policy, that is the trend of the Commission's voting. On February 8, 1978 having beer. fixed as the time for the continued hearing on this item, the hearing was declared open by the Chairman. Staff recommended denial for the reason that it is inconsistent with the goals for preserving agricultural land. VICTOR LUND, JR., stated the staff report states 2 of the parcels. contain 20% slopes; there is a lack of water. Drilled a well and got 5 gallons per minute. Mentioned the (Continued_page 2) Upon the MOTION of Commissioner WRIGHT SECONDED by--Commissioner KENNETT , the application was approved, subject. to amended staff conditions.(Exhibit "A" attached) by the following vote on May 17, 1978 AYES: Commissioners - WRIGHT, KENNETT; BUROW, YOUNG NOES: Commissioners - BEST, OLANDER, MEAKIN ABSENT: Commissioners - NONE ABSTAIN: Commissioners - NONE APPLICANT: Victor L. Lund, Jr. , APPEALED P.O. Box 458, Pleasanton, CA 94566 OWNER: Same 00813 APPLICATION NO. MS 226-77 ASSESSOR'S . ... ... _-..,... ,. .., ..._...,._4.z _ .._ .' w.,.+�'. :`"r'"f`:..r.s..�-.:dio-Yc.4;, ��.:z'�� •.''�w.!S1,ido..y7a,'FY' -.�_.—r-¢s tCitnY+�'�;,,'-�'.. Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 2 problems of roaming dogs, off road vehicles, etc. created by smaller parcels and .he pointed out it isn't necessarily the people moving into the area creating these problems. This county does allow 20 acres parcels in the agricultural preserve district. Almost the whole report alluded to negative environmental impact. If the application isn't denied, then it is recommended it be two 80 acre parcels and he stated he couldn't live with that. Referring to condition x:11, he stated this property is in the- Livermore School District. RUSSELL K. SCHAEFFER, 3139 San Ramon Valley Blvd., San Ramon, CA stated this Williamson thing is voluntery where people take large parcels of land, 20 acres and over and put in a preserve. This owner elected not to take the tax break but subdivide instead into 20 acre parcels. The difficulty the ranchers face out there has been isolation and if you have people around , they can watch fence lines, etc. On each of these parcels, -there are 4 to 5 acres of good level land to build a house and barn. The requirement for septic tanks have to be approved before they can get a final parcel map. Basically, he felt there was a moral obligation here, that people should have-a right to live-on that land. Victor is trying to build sites for himself and others to live out here. _ GORDON TURNER, Attorney, 924 Main St., Martinez, CA, representing the opposition, submitted packets to the Commissioners. Referring to Exhibit A, he stated he didn't :see any 4 or 5 acre level parcels on the map. The purpose of the Agricultural Preserve is that. the land cannot be used for any purpose other than agriculture for 10 years; the land is . locked up for -10 years. The land is only good for cattle country and many'of the surrounding property owners have put their land in a preserve. To allow,minor subdivisions will ultimately break down the agricultural lands. Each parcel can in turn divide. Staff has pointed out what is happening. This is only good for cattle raising. Staff has discussed the problems of motor bikes and those kinds of things. The area is very shy of water , the only source being springs and pump. Minor subdivisions will break down the area for cattle raising. MR. LUND, in rebuttal, stated the taxes were $4,000 and the gross income $800 a year. COMMISSIONER OLANDER asked if he had intended to subdivide when he purchased the property. I.M. LUND replied he had planned to subdivide a portion of the property and to keep the majority of it. That was the reason he purchased property in the A-2 zone. He knew what the A-4 zone was and did not think this an unreasonable request. COMMISSIONER OLANDER stated he could respect Mr. Lund's desire to leave out in that country but was concerned in the inconsistency of neighbors in the A-4 land. He agreed wholeheartedly with staff's recommendation for denial and the four reasons given. COMMISSIONER WRIGHT disagreed with staff's reasons for denial; felt it could be cut into four 40 acre parcels. COMMISSIONER KF21NETT pointed out this was zoned A-2 and he would vote for it for four 40 acre parcels. He didn't feel 40 acre parcels take away from the surrounding area that much, or that one homesite on 40 acres is unreasonable. COMMISSIONER BEST felt it was not compatible with the surrounding area. nVS14 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 3 CONMISSIONER OLANDER made a Motion, Seconded by Commissioner BEST that the application be denied without prejudice. AYES: Commissioners - OLANDER, BEST, YOUNG NOES: Commissioners - KENNETT, BUROW, WRIGHT ABSENT: Commissioners - MEAKIN The motion did not carry for lack of a majority. Upon the Motion of Commissioner BEST, Seconded by Commissioner OLANDER, the hearing. on the application was continued to March 8, 1978 by the following- vote. _ AYES: Commissioners - BEST, OLANDER, KENNETT, BUROW, WRIGHT, YOUNG `.* NOES: Commissioners - NONE ABSENT: Commissioners - MEAKIN On March 8, 1978 having been fixed as the time for the continued hearing on this item, the hearing was declared open by the Chairman. Commissioners Kennett and Meakin were absent. , Upon the Motion of Commissioner OLANDER, Seconded by Commissioner BEST, the hearing on . the application was postponed- to April 19, 1978 by the following vote. AYES: Commissioners - OLANDER, BEST, BUROW, WRIGHT, YOUNG NOES: Commissioners - NONE ABSENT: Commissioners - KENNETT, MEAKIN On April 19, 1978 having been fixed as the. time for the continued hearing on this item, , the hearing was declared open by the Chairman. Upon the Motion of Commissioner BUROW, Seconded by Commissioner BEST, the hearing on this application was postponed to May 3; 1978 by a unanimous vote. On May 3, 1978 having been fixed as the time for the continued hearing on this item, the hearing was declared open by the Chairman: , BRIAN D.' THIESSEN, Box 218, Danville, CA, representing the applicant, requested the* hearing be continued as all the Commissioners were not present. At the previous hearing, it was a tie vote, one Commissioner being absent. GORDON B. TURNER, P.O. Box 110, Martinez, CA, representing the opposition, objected to a continuance. He has come to the hearing on two previous occasions and it was then postponed. Requested he be notified prior to the hearing, if it was not going to be heard. COMMISSIONER MEAKIN made a Motion, Seconded by Commissioner OLANDER, that the continuance be denied. AYES: Commissioners - MEAKIN, OLANDER NOES: Commissioners - BEST, WRIGHT, YOUNG R��� ABSENT: Commissioners - BUROW, KENNETT Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 page 4 Upon the Motion of COMMISSIONER WRIGHT, Seconded by COMMISSIONER BEST, the hearing on the application was continued to May 17, 1978 by the following vote. AYES: Commissioners - WRIGHT, BEST, YOUNG NOES: Commissioners - OLANDER, ME]kKIN ABSENT: Commissioners - BUROW, KENNETT On May 17, 1978 having been fixed as the time for the continued hearing on this item, the hearing was declared open by the Chairman. Staff presented the staff report, described the project and explained the location. The application has been continued several times. The original map showed 4 parcels (20.1, 20.1, 20.1 and 98 acres); he has submitted a revised map showing 4 parcels of 40 acres each. Staff recommended denial but if.approved, two 80 acre parcels, with conditions. CHAIRMAN YOUNG polled the Commission to determine if they should open the hearing and hear-the application again. The majority of the Commissioners voted to reopen the hearing, in view of the revised map. BRIAN D. THIESSEN, P.O. Box 218, Danville, CA, representing the applicant, stated he was not at the original hearing. Mr. & Mrs. Lund had attempted to meet with staff but were advised they should take up any points with the Commission. The staff report states the property fronts 100' on Marciel Road, whereas it actually fronts 900' on Marciel Road. Victor Lund is the applicant/owner of this property, whereas the staff report shows Gordon Rasmussen as owner and he feels, because of past situations, part of the opposi- tion maybe because the people think Mr. Rasmussen has something to do with this application. The staff report indicates that all adjacent parcels are significantly larger. (He posted a map showing within a mile, numerous parcels smaller than the ones requested, and explained.) The staff person preparing the report had not personally viewed the property. The report indicated the topography was steep with slopes over 20%. All of the parcels have 70% of the land that is less than 20% slope, probably less than 10%. The overall topography of this entire 160 acres is much less severe than' what has been approved for 1/2 acre across the street. They are asking for only one house for 40 acres. Further on the report states that because of the topography, significant grading may be necessary for. suitable building pads: this is not true; none of the building sites that have been identified by Vic Lund that would require any significant grading (and he pointed these out on the map). There is adequate space and adequate soil to take care of leach fields, contrary to the staff report. On page 2 of the staff report it states "groundwater quantity is unreliable for domestic use" and that adjacent ranchers have had to haul in water. There is a well on this property that pumps 6 to 7 gallons per minute less than 85' deep; there is also a spring on the property that ran throughout the drought. In any event, the conditions require water to be available. They say there is adequate water available. Further down on the page it states the ranchers in the immediate area have severe problems with roaming dogs, cut fences, etc. and he felt that had been pointed out previously that this was not from the people living there but intrusion from people in Livermore and Pleasanton. None of the objectors that they have been able to identify, live•on Marciel Road and he pointed out the map, the homes of the primary objectors. 00816 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 5 He brought up the question of what constitutes an agricultural unit; 'would 500 acres be more agricultural than 80 acres. Mr. & Mrs. Lund plan on having 20 to 25 head of cattle on the 80 acres they are going to keep and- asked if it meant they were notagriculturalists because they didn't have 160 acres or 260 acres. Mr. Lund has a history of ranching and farming and was appointed to the Tassajara Advisory Committee and identified as a rancher and farmer. People like the Lunds who use the land for more intense agricultural use are properly catagorized as agriculturalists and to say that use is incompatible with open grazing, he didn't think was an accurate characterization of their use. On the same page it states that the property is not suitable for rural residential uses for the reasons mentioned above; topography, soils, water, inadequate fire protection, etc. He felt he had covered this. The next paragraph indicates this would set a precedent and if 20 acre parcels are created, it would be difficult to deny future requests. He referred to the map and pointed out the A-2 and A-4 areas. Mr. Lund did not choose to put his land in A-4; has paid taxes on A-2 and to now be told it would be treated as A-4 seems inconsistent to him. It seems as if the county is trying to force this and other properties into A-4 and off the tax rolls. Further down on the page it states "it is not likely that these parcels would be agriculturally viable and fulfill the intent of the Williamson Act". It..would seem that the staff personnel is saying they don't want them put into the Williamson Act on.that small a parcel, and yet there is 20 - 25 acre parcels in the Williamson Act everywhere. It seems to him on one hand they are told it should be put into the William- son Act and on the other hand told it should not be. On the bottom of that page it states, "The proposed..subdivision is also inconsistent with the recommendations of the recently completed Tassajara Study." Somehow there is an impression that staff proposals on the Tassajara Study was adopted and should be used as a criteria. He didn't think that is what the Commission agreed to, or the Board of Supervisors agreed to; he thought instead they had agreed that each parcel should be evaluated on its own merits. On page 3 it states, "This application could have significant environmental impacts"; this is inconsistent with the Negative Impact Report filed by Arnold Jonas on November 15, 1977. He understood the Park Dedication fee had gone up from $5.00 to $300.00 a parcel, one of the burdens of the delay. On page 3 under recommendations, it talks about the physical constraints. He did not feel there were physical constraints on this magnitude parcels. He submits the proposed uses by the Lunds is agriculture, for raising pure bred,Angus cattle, as they are now doing elsewhere and is not incompatible. The last statement that the "subject request is not consistent with the Commission initiated and adopted Tassajara Study", he felt that misstates what the Commission did. Referring to the conditions recommended by staff, on 04 he did not think they had any objections to that but don't know what the Fire District's requirements are. Condition 11, should be deleted as it is not in the San Ramon School bistrict. Condition #12, they cannot put it in Agricultural Preserve, as this is so stated in the Deed of Trust. They are agreeable to dedicating development rights for all but,one residence but ask that it be for a 5 year period. 0081'7 7 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 6 The Lunds have been in this process for 9 months, and when they Filed the application there was no Tassajara Study and supposedly could have divided it down to 5 or 10 acres, just as others have during that time period. They bought the property in November, relying on the zoning at that time and they feel the division is reasonable. The attorney for the opposition represents 32' people with some 6,000 or 7,000 acres. In the file there is a petition with 15 signatures on it. (He went down the list of each individual and pointed out those that live on the property and those who live else- where.) There is only one other property owner that uses Marciel Road. Mr. Ed Wright advised Mr. Lund he was withdrawing his opposition (which Mr. Bragdon confirmed). The people to the west also told Mr. Lund they were withdrawing their opposition (staff unable to confirm). He felt what was represented to the Commission*•is.not 'really the way it is today. - - He; read.a statement prepared by the Lunds, .as to. their .plans .for,the. property.: They now. lease a ranch in Pleasanton, running about 60 head of_ cattle in a cow-calf operation. Their 2 boys were in 4-H and are now in FFA members in high school, majoring in agri- culture. They plan to use the Marciel ranch for a pure bred Angus operation. Selling off the other parcels is the only way they can proceed. Mr. Lund's family has been in agriculture since 1921 and in the Livermore-Pleasanton area since 1939. In;recent' years he has been a 7 year 4-H leader. Was active in 4-H in growing up and after military service, he returned home and attended UC Davis and majored in animal science.. He has been a member of the Farm Bureau and Cattlemen's Association for 20 years;. 6 years as Secretary-Treasurer of Contra Costa-Alameda Cattlemen's Association; 6 years as Calif- ornia Cattlemen's Association State Director; 9 years on the CCA State Taxation Committee. His fu-11 time real estate, although they live on a ranch and kept . involved in a-ricu1ture. Mrs. Lund has been just as involved, 4-H member; 4-H leader and member of Cow Belles for 20 years; serving on various committees and going through the officers chairs to president; State committees and now on National Cow Belles Credential Committee. He felt they could be classified as true agriculturalists, - even though it is not their prime occupation. He felt there was a factor staff did not consider, the Lunds, who they are; what they want to do with this property; how this specific parcel relates- to other parcels along Marciel Road. They are willing to commit themselves to the 5 year no subdivision and feel they would be an asset to the ranching community. They are asking for the four 40 acre parcels. GORDON B. TURNER, P.O. Box 110, Martinez, CA, representing the opposition, stated there is a written petition on file with 32 signatures on it: This parcel is situated in the center of an Agriculture Preserve zoned area comprising 7,000 to 8,000 acres. Exhibit B is the county zoning map showing the agriculture preserve zone land, all subject to the restrictions under the Land Conservation Act of 1965. In response to what Mr. Thiessen said about there being a lot of little 5 acre, 10 acre and 1/4 acre parcels in there, they are part of a much larger ownership, substantially all of them are zoned agricultural preserve, restricted for agricultural use only. The topography of it, he thought the USGS topographic map is about an accurate a contour map as you can get anywhere and Exhibit A he has outlined the topography of the lands and they are by no means what you would call gentle rolling hills; they are steep hills rising to 3n elevation of 1261 feet at the top. There are no utilities in this area and there is little or no water. The lands are not suitable for small farming, only grazing. Pfr. Thiessen conceded for 00818 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 7 cattle ranching you have to have substantial acreage; the average about 7 acres for steer operation and 10 acres for cow and calf. The instability of the soils in the . general area is a real problem; numerous land slides throughout the area. The division of these lands into 4 parcels, will inevitably lead to further division and further division down to S acres. It will lead to a complete breakdown of agricultural preserve zoned area. The existing roads are not adequate to take care of increased traffic that will be produced if and when that happens. The dedication of development rights for no more building for S years; what will happen after the 5 years? He said the agricultural preserve restrictions can be withdrawn at any time; that is wholly incorrect. Under the California Land Conservation Act, the restrictions are imposed -for a period of 10 years and unless prior notice is given, it is renewed for another year, so there is continually a 10 year period ahead of you. Up to this date, there have been very few allowed to withdraw from the- agricultural preserves'. If the Board does allow-you to` withdraw, the penalties are 50% of the assessed value of- the land newly assessed. That really means 12k7.. of fair market value. This area was set aside to assure the continu- ance•of agriculture and if this land is allowed to be subdivided, it will be resubdivided again and again and you are going to have a complete breakdown. We have already seen a very heavy destruction of farming throughout this area. We have to have room for growth but we also have to have room for agriculture. Mr. Thiessen said residences don't produce problems, they come from other areas. That is not true. He represents residents from Tassajara Road and Lawrence Road and they are having all kinds of troubles. There has been an enormous amount of minor subdivisions that have taken p=ace and the r==chers are having an untold amount of trouble; dogs chasing cattle, hunters, trespassers, etc. and the fire hazard is tremendous during the dry season. As he understands it, this plan is contrary to the General Plan and also is contrary to the studies and considerations of some agricultural areas in the Tassajara area. Whether the ranchers live on the property.or right next to Mr. Lund, he didn't feel makes any difference whatsoever: This isn't a matter of objection for residential purposes; this is a matter of objections by legitimate ranchers against the intrusion and against the division of land that will ultimately lead to the breakdown of their ranching activities, destroy them. He hasn't rechecked the petitions; they are on file; there are 32 signatures and they all live around that area and they own an awful lot of land, some 7,000 to 8,000 acres. Mr. Thiessen says they have checked the water, the slopes and the soil and they are adequate. He hasn't seen any technical reports by any engineers, by any water experts substantiating that. He understands water is very, very scarce in that area; only small springs and shallow wells. He urged the Commission to uphold the recommendation of the Planning staff and this application be denied. MARGARET LEONARDINI, 2001 Victorine Road, Livermore, CA, in opposition, stated their property is east of and adjacent to the Marciel Ranch. They-did not object when Mr. Rasmussen purchased the Marciel Ranch but became suspicious when Mr. Lund purchased it from Mr. Rasmussen as it didn't seem logical to pay $200,000 for 160 acres of hill land that cannot be irrigated, at least for farming or cattle. He has stated he could not pay his taxes but one crop of barley would pay the taxes. He let a beautiful crop on the 160 acres go to waste. If this were allowed, they may be forced out with another Finley 00819 f Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 8 Road or Lawrence Road. They have been on their present farm for almost 18 years and have come to love and respect the farmer's-way of life. It was stated city people are being deprived of having 20 acres to live on but these same people go back to their high paying jobs in the city, while the farmers remain on their land, trying to make a living. Their Fire Department are all volunteers, gone during the day and no fire protection for these city people. The city people are often insensitive to the farmers needs; leave gates open, trample crops, allow dogs or children to roam or hunt. We cannot stop progress but this particular subdivision totally disrupts the only large farming area left on the north side of Livermore. We requested the subdivision be denied and help save the farmers and cattlemen in this area from extinction. JULEDA BETTENCOURT, 9055 Highland Road, Livermore, CA, in opposition, stated there was another petition. She had some question regarding the ownership of the property.. The property was bought by Mr. Rasmussen and sold'in.a short period of time for considerable profit and felt it was for development purposes. She realizes development is coming into the area but felt it should be done with caution and good planning. She can't see where allowing a subdivision right in the middle of agricultural land is good planning. They are having terrible water problems up there. There are many areas that could be divided on the periphery of agricultural land. Two 80 acre parcels sounds quite legiti- mate. Holding it for 5 years, that isn't a very long time. She felt the 4 parcels. would be wrong. MR. THIESSEN, in rebuttal, stated they reviewed the petition on file and the other petition referred to, was not in the file. He mentioned initially within 1/2 to 3/4 mile there were smaller parcels in A-2 and only the A-2 parcels were colored yellow on the map. There are many small parcels in A-4. (He pointed out several on the map.) Mr, Turner suggested the USGS topographic map is accurate, that is true but the staff didn't check it out on this ground. He also mentioned that the property rises to 1260, our map shows 1240; he didn't mention the lowest property is 920 to 940. The highest parcel is only about 1100. It was stated it is going to be overworking Marciel Road. Public Works has recommended approval and set forth conditions, including dedication. It was asked what is going to happen in 5 years; it will be up to this Commission or some Commission and felt at that time it will be determined what really should happen in this area. Ile didn't wish to get into the withdrawal from the Williamson Act and all the side issues; however, he did not agree with Mr. Turner. He did not agree that this would lead to resubdivision. It was suggested this is in violation of the General Plan. The General Plan calls for this to be open space; open space is down to 5 acres. -They are.going for 40 acres and there is no way that can be construed to be in violation of the General Plan. Mr. Turner suggested this was opposed by the legitimate ranchers. There were 32 . signatures on the petition, some have withdrawn, so say 16 families objected. He felt much of the objection was due to lack of understanding. 40 to 50 members of the Tassajara Preservation Committee who suggested there should not be this sort of ban. He (Mr. Turner) talked of water and soils not being adequate. Mr. Leonardini does have water problems, as does some of the other properties but this property does not have a water problem and even if it did, the conditions take care of that. There couldn' t be any building unless there were adequate water. 00820 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 9 Mrs. Leonardini mentioned Lund hadn't cut the fine crop of barley. He contacted 30 to 40 people to harvest the crop this year and all the cutters are busy, they just aren't available. He would like to get it cut too. Mrs. Bettencourt expressed the underlying concern of all the people signing the petition without knowing what the history was. Mr. Rasmussen did make a lot of profit but that is not Mr. Lund's concern, or theirs. Their concern should be what Mr. Lund is going to use it for and how he is willing to prevent further subdivision of this parcel. He is willing to deed restrict it and put it on the Parcel Map. He requested approval. CHAIRMAN YOUNG closed the public hearing and commented it will not be a hasty decision, with all the continuances. COMMISSIONER BEST stated the concern she still has and doesn't feel has been adequately satisfied by the applicant, is the problem they have recognized in that area, the increasing number of subdivisions into smaller parcels, •And particularly this application in an area surrounded largely by ag preserve areas of very large size. As Commissioners, she felt they should recognize that problem and be concerned about what is. going to happen there in the future. She believed to approval the subdivision for 40 acre parcels would set a precedent and would be very hard for them to deny future applications of that nature. She is not opposed to ranchette development in certain specified areas in the Tassajara area and there is probably going to be a need for a larger minimum parcel size in certain areas. She would feel comfortable with two 80 acre parcels, which would allow Mr. Lund to sell off half of the property and would be comfortable with a 5 year limit on further subdivision. The situation out there now is they don't have the services and have not planned for a community out there. COMMISSIONER MEAKIN agreed with Mrs. Best. There were many arguments and good ones presented by Mr. Thiessen in support of the owner's subdivision request, but he thought the division into four 40 acre parcels in this location is inappropriate. He also would agree to go with the two 80 acre parcels, if the applicant wished to amend his request. At the present time, he would not go along with the four 40 acre parcels. s COMMISSIONER KENNETT agreed in part with the previous comments, in that this area is a difficult one to deal with. In this particular situation he felt they should consider the fact that the property has been in A-2 for some time and has .not been in A-4. He didn't feel going to four 40 acre parcels is inconsistent with the intent of their Tassajara area study. Based upon all the material they have been given and the presenta- tions this evening, it seemed to him that they should approve four parcels of 40 acres with the conditions set forth by the staff with any modifications necessary to them to make them apply to the four; deleting the San Ramon Valley School District condition. He would particularly and specifically leave in the modified condition 12, that the property could not be further subdivided, without any 5 year limitation. He would go for approval of four parcels. COMMISSIONER 14RIGHT stated it was interesting that no one has touched on 99% of the staff report, and that is the possibility of slope problems, the possibility of lack of water, concern with regard to road, topography problems; really what it boils down to is should this be a two lot division or a four lot division. The water sit�sation takes care of itself; he felt it was up to the applicant to prove that he can get water and up to the applicant to prove, whether it is 2 or 4 parcels, that he can put in septic tanks. On topography, he is not convinced that a USGS map is that accurate and never has been. 00821 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page IO He did not feel that two additional homesites in that area is going to jeopardize the agriculture viability of the surrounding property, and that is exactly what it boils down to. Are those two additional homesites going to jeopardize the use of that land? He felt they will admit that an 80 acre parcel is not an economic agricultural unit any more than a 40 acre parcel. He would be willing to go along with the four 40 acre parcels. COMMISSIONER OLANDER stated he thought this is the most remote piece of land they have looked at so far for subdivision. Looking at the land about it, topo maps accuracy or not, it's steep terrain in a good part of it; pretty wild land and he felt they were compromising the very basic reason that prompted their Tassajara study in the first place, their concern over what subdivision does to land of that kind. -He felt if they were to approve it at all, 2 or •4, they would be encouraging further subdivision of this type which will bring about further --- what he's sure it is to the ranchers, outrageous pri--es for the property and while it is true that is at the-risk of the, buyer, it is :also dealing rather heavily with the tax situation of surrounding land- owners and sooner or later they are going to be forced into having to subdivide them- selves. He believed that Mr. Lund had been led to believe perhaps early, that he had a reasonable subdivision and he has been caught in the middle of this Tassajara study; possibly one of the reasons they are holding it. Personally he is against'any kind of subdivision to. that land until they have conclusions from the Tassajara study drawn, where they do have parcel sizes and areas in mind and felt they would set a,precedent here whether they have 40 or 80 acres in each; he felt it was a matter of principle here involved. He agreed with Mr. Wright that 40 acres or 80 acres doesn't make it- viable, neither does 160 acres, particularly 160 acres at approximately $200,000. For a well trained agrlcultu:aiist =tile raiser, that's a surprising price to pay for raising 20 Black Angus. COMMISSIONER BUROW stated she still has the question going through her mind, what is an agricultural use and what is the land being put to use for. She does believe that people can take 20 acres or 40 acres and sometimes do more with it than people who have 150 acres and tetally neglect it. If they go for four parcels, they should leave it in no further subdivision; she didn't feel that was unreasonable. She didn't feel 5 years would change that. She looked at this property and she believes that 4 houses could be put there without an impact. That doesn't concern her. [that does concern her is how many more splits will they have; it's really a tough decision. She didn't feel 2 more houses would make an impact there. Mr. Lund stated he wants to keep 80 acres for himself. She asked why not have one 80 acres and two 40 acres. She is really touched by what these people want to do and really believe.they want to use this land for agricultural use; that hisintent was not just to subdivide but to buy a piece of property whereby he could afford to own that and use it for that use, only if he could sell off a portion of it. They see this all the time and the people put the land to good use. Ranchette is not a dirty word; it does allow people a life style. CHAIRMAN YOUNG stated he agreed basically with Mr. Wright. The matter of agriculture in the Tassajara Valley is a difficult one, he has come to realize, and agree with those who have said probably 100 acres isn't enough for agricultural use or even 500 doesn't carry a rancher any more. Therefore the exact size of the parcel is not important. To . him the question is, if they create 40 acre parcels, will they bg basically residential, as 5 acre parcels would be, or would they be basically agricultural. It seems to him, anybody buying a 40 acre parcel would have some agricultural use and in this way, they 00 8291 4 Victor Lund, Jr. - MS 226-77 Page 11 would be carrying out the intent of the General Plan, which is to preserve the area for agriculture. He would certainly agree with anybody who said it would be better to have this zoned A-4 and not to divide it, but &re' is also the right' of, the property owner to parcel his land under some circumstances,,where it does not change basically the use which is indicated for the area and he didn't think a parcel size of 40 'acres would be other than agricultural. COMMISSIONER WRIGHT made a motion for approval of MS 226-77 as indicated on the top map identified as Exhibit A subject to staff conditions with the following changes:. Condition 11 be eliminated; condition 12 amended as shown on May 17th ,staff amendment; condition 3 as staff amendment of May 17th to show $900. It was found that the proposed minor subdivision into 40 acre parcels,- is. in conformance with the General Plan; it is consistent with the intent of the Tassajara Study;; and would not have an adverse impact on surrounding agricultural uses. _ :0023 CONTRA COSTA COUNI'Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report XXX Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency Other Responsible Agency z j Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2024 Phone EIR Contact Person Dale Sanders Contact Person ` PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VICTOR L. LUND, JR. (Applicant) - GORDON R. AND KAREN L. RASMUSSEN wners , County File S 226-77: The applicant requests approval of a minor su ivision to divide 160 acres into 4 parcels. Subject property is described as follows: A 160 acre parcel fronting for 100-feet on the southeast side of Marcel Road, approximately 1 mile north of Camino Tassajara, in the Tassajara area. (A-2) (CT 3551) (Parcel #6-160-006 and 007) 3 ' s t It is determined from initial study by Dale Sanders of the ®Planning Department that this project does not have a significant. effect on the environment. XXX Justification for negative declaration is attached. The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below faddress: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine & Escobar Streets Martinez, California { Dae Pos ed Omw:9-RJ2) Final date for review/appeal IVULVQFQ. i 1 . By Planning Departm n Representative ADO 117d ` r r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of' California June 27 , i9 78 In the Matter of Report of Planning Commission on the request of Mr. William J. Elizondo, Applicant and Owner, (2213-RZ) to Rezone Land in the Oakley Area. The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the request of Mr. William J. Elizondo (2213-RZ) to rezone- approximately 5.53 acres fronting approximately 385. feet on the west side of O'Hara Avenue, approximately 400 feet south of Laurel Avenue; Oakley area; from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held: on Tuesday, August 1, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, Room 107, County Administration Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that pursuant to code requirements, the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish notice of same. , PASSED by Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Mr. W. J. Elizondo Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors Names Provided by Planning affixed this 27thday of June i9 78 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By T - Deputy Clerk Robbie e errez H-24 4/77 ism RECEIVE - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUrt 1978( J. P. OLSSON CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �GONTRA C STA CO. BY_ Gtr. —Deputy TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: June 16, 1978 Contra Costa, County r FROM: Anthony A. Deha:esus SUBJECT: REZONING: William J. E1 i zondo, Director of Plannin (2213-RZ) - 5.53 Acres, A-2 to R-40, Oakley area (S.D. V). Attached is County Planni 9 mmission Resolution No. 47-1978, adopted by the.County Planning Commission Tuesd 'y, 13 June 1978, by unanimous vote (All members Present) . This rezoning application was reviewed by the County Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 6, 1978, and was approved at that meeting for the change from General Agricult- ural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) by unanimous vote of the Commission (all members being Present) . ; The property is described as being 5.53 acres fronting approximately 385-ft. , on the west side of O'Hara Avenue, approximately 400-ft., south of Laurel Avenue, in the Oakley area. _ The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: William J. Elizando (Applicant & Owner) Route #1 - Box 451 Oakley, California 94561 Mr. Roscoe Feller 100 East 18th Street , Antioch, California 94509 AAD/v , . cc: File 2213-RZ Supervisors, District: I, II, III, IV, V. Attachments: Resolution, Findings Map, Area Map, Staff Report, Neg.EIR, Minutes. 00820 Resolution No. 47-1978 RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING BY WILLIAM J. ELIZONDO (APPLICANT & OWNER), (2213-RZ), IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE OAKLEY AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by WILLIAM J. ELIZONDO (Applicant & Owner), (2213-RZ), to rezone land in the Oakley area from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40), was received by the Planning .Department Office on January 20, 1978; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was. posted on this application on March 31 , 1978; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 6, 1978, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evalua- ted all the testimony and evidence submitted; and -• NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the Launty of Contra Costa, that the rezoning request of WILLIAM J. ELIZONDO (Applicant & Owner), (2213-RZ), to rezone approximately 5.53 acres of land from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40), be APPROVED and that this zoning change be made as is indicated on the findings map entitled: A PORTION OF THE BYRON DIVISION, SECTOR I, CONTRA COSTA , COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommendation are as follows: (1) The requested change in zoning substantially conforms with the newly. adopted East County General Plan Amendment. (2) The contiguous Planned Community area is largely developed (i.e., most of the area in Oakley north of Laurel Road is built out at the resident- ial densities assigned by the General Plan). (3) Adequate utility capacity is available and service lines or trunks are in proximity to the area. (4) Costs of providing the development with public services, including street improvements, are fully assumed by the developer. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary.of this Planning Commission shall sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the County Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. 00827 Resolution No. 47-1978 The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 6, 1978, by the follow- ing vote: AYES: Commissioners - Milano, Phillips, Stoddard, .Young, Walton, Compaglia, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Donald E. Anderson, Chairman of the County Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing. was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, June 13; 1978, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the follow- ing vote of the Planning Commission: AYES: Commissioners - 11ilano, Young, Phillips, Stoddard, Compaglia, Walton, Anderson., NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. Chairman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California ATTEST: Se eta y f the P a ning Commis on of the ounty f Contra sta, State o California 00828 -2- yam,,,,:•..... - - - .....,...o......• ._�..............►-.. -...�.�.. ..- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DuAwrMENT NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report CXx :]Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance Lead Agency -Other Responsible Agency , • Contra Costa County c/o Planning Department P.O. Box 951 Martinez, California 94553 Phone (415) 372-2035 Phone EIR Contact Person Kristin Ohlson Contact Person PROJECT DESCRIPTION: WILLIAM J. ELIZONCO (Applicant & Ramer), County File JaM-RZ: The applicant requests to rezone approximately 5.53 acres from General Agriculture District A-2 to Single Family Residential Ustrict R-40.. SUbject property fronts.. approximately 385 feet on the west side of O'Hara Avenue, approximately 400. feet south of laurel Avverm, in the Oakley area. . The project wi11 not have a significant effect on the envirormmt. However, the project is inconsistent with the new General Plan for the area which calls for no subdivision below 5 acres unless public water or sewer is available to the site. The project is also in an area designated for interim agriculture; the rezoning is untimely and should not be approved. y It is determined from initial study by Kristin Ohlson of the XXPlanning Department that this project does not have a significant effect on the environment. Justification for negative declaration is attached. � ]The Environmental Impact Report is available for review at the below address: Contra Costa County Planning Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Bldg. Pine 4 Escobar Streets *• Martinez, California (• Dat Pos ed 1�mco ims Final date for review/appeal t-t 1�- 10 Imtj By � �-- 90029 Planning Departm nt Representative I. WILLIAM J. ELIZONDO (Applicant $ Owner) , County File 2213-RZ: The applicant requests to rezone- approximately 5.53 acres from General Agricultural District A-2 to Single Family Residential District. R-40. Subject property fronts approximately 385' on the west side of O'Hara Avenue, approximately 400' south of Laurel avenue, in the Oakley area. This application was first heard by the County Planning Commission on April 25, 1978 and was continued in order for staff to. investigate utility availability for the site, and extent of development north of Laurel Road. II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Present Zoning: General Agricultural District A-2 B. Requested Zoning: Single Family Residential R-40 C. General Plan Designation: Single Family Residential - Interim Agriculture (East County Area General Plan) D. Present Land Use: Single Family Residential and orchard trees E. Proposed Land Use: Three additional .lots with single family residences F. Surrounding Land Use: Orchards and occasional rural residential uses G. E.T.R. Status: Negative Declaration III. DISCUSSION A. Nature of Request: The applicant wants to rezone the property so he can subdivide it and create three additional lots. B. Surrounding Land Use: 5-acre parcels to north and east; other fi earby parcel sizes are 14 acres to south, and 20 acres to northeast; 2'1 acre lots are adjacent to -south which have existed for a long time. C. Environmental Considerations: The environmental concerns of this kind of zoning_in an area without public services are well documented. The site is located in an area where rapid permaeability of soil increases the possibility of ground- water contamination. The Oakley Water District has indicated that, upon annexation, the District would provide public crater to the site. The site is within the Oakley Sanitary District boundaries but not within an area which is presently served by sewer. Extension of sewer services to the site would be economically unfeasible for the applicant. The decision regarding annexation to the. water district would bemade by LAFCO. 00830 William J. Elizondo 2213-RZ -2- D. Staff Analysis: This rezoning proposal is inconsistent with the land use policies of the newly adopted East County Area General Plan and the intent of the Plan to stage growth in the Oakley area. The site is located in an area designated "Single Family Residential - Interim Agriculture". Page 20 of the draft plan states: "this (interim agriculture) portion of the Planned Community should be considered for subdivision only when all of the following criteria aTe. met: - 1. The contiguous Planned Community area is. largely developed. (i.e., most of the area in Oakley north of Laurel' Road is - built out at the residential densities assigned by.the General Plan). 7 Adequate utility capacity is available and service .lines or trunks are in proximity to area. 3. Costs of providing the development with public services; including street improvements, are fully assumed by the developer. The first criteria cannot be applied 'to the site since little of the Oakley area north of Laurel Road is built out at the densities assigned by the General Plan. In a staff report prepared for the Planning Commission during their review of the East County Area General Plan draft, dated April 4, 1977, the following information regarding holding capacity of Oakley was presented: "The present population of the Oakley/Sandhill area is 4,950 (1975 Countywide Special Census) . An additional 2,350 persons are projected for this area by 1990. All of this growth could be accommodated by the small 840-acre area east of Empire Road and north of the Contra Costa Canal at the densities proposed by staff, .even`though this area represents only 250 of the Oakley/.Sandhill Planned Community." A major subdivision (5161) and rezoning to R-40 (2178-RZ) were approved by the County Planning Commission March 28, 1978 for a 50-acre parcel north of the site (approximately 4001). However, this subdivision is located within the present boundaries of Oakley water District and therefore required no annexation to the District. In addition, the subdivision, although located within the Oakley Sanitary District and was approved for septic tanks, no extension of sewer services was required. This development alone cannot be considered an indication that the Planned Community area north of Laurel Road is largely built out at the densities assigned by the General Plan. Several large parcels of 30 acres or more are still zoned A-2 in the area north of the Contra Costa Canal and shown for single family-high density in the General Plan or R-6 lots. If the area north of the canal and east of Empire Road within the Planned Community can accommodate 2,350 persons alone, then the addition of 48 lots or 150 persons can hardly be considered a build-out of the area north of Laurel Avenue. 00831 William J. Elizondo 2213-RZ -3- The criteria listed above are intended to provide a staging mechanism for growth in Oakley since the Planned Community area is so much larger than necessary to accommodate the projected growth in the area in the next 10 years. One of the major policies of the General Plan is to encourage con- tiguous growth in an orderly and efficient manner. If areas south of Laurel Road are permitted to subdivide at this time, the effort to stage growth in a compact manner will be seriously undermined. The subject site is Parcel D of a minor subdivision which was , approved in 1976. A new single family residence has. been con- structed on the site. The applicant's contention that the rezoning is necessary because the orchard is old and unproductive appears invalid since the five-acre parcel was created only two years ago and at that time it was evident that it would not be a viable agricultural unit. Rezoning the site to R-40 at this time would essentially allow a 4 X 4 subdivision in a short time period of only two years. E. Conclusion: The proposal for a rezoning to R-40 is inconsistent with the policies and criteria of the East County Area General Plan which prohibits subdivision to less than 5 acres until a large portion of the Oakley Planned Community is built out at the densities assigned by the General Plan. Since the Plan was just adopted two months ago, it is obvious that the Oakley area north of Laurel has not undergone sufficient development to be considered "built out". Should the Commission decide to approve the rezoning, their decision would be ' based on judgment other than the growth criteria which the Commission adopted as part of the East County Area General Plan. IV. RECOiNNENDATION Deny the application 2213-RZ for the following reason: 1. The rezoning is untimely and premature and would serious undermine efforts to stage growth in Oakley. It isinconsistentwith the criteria noted in the General Plan for subdivision south of Laurel Road. It would set an undesirable precedent for similar requests south of Laurel Road. KO:dh 5/10/78 00832 ,�� � i ?•-r._ '— �:��OAKLE Y 1 �1 tit / \• 111 4000' Rezone /////—I �'/// ZIra From A�To �t{Q .%'� A_2 � •- J�2 // •e 7fw1/(R-6 / .L /(R I5 I / /A 2 i .n r.rt. n•r • ` • RNI00 ' ^� ` A•21 / 'rrrr�a-40 J; t•w ♦ ..1�. a.1.l. / 1 I, -Do kLb �686t]t Chairman of t'w Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of_A,_poAT_1QN�OE THE_...—_ KCAL 1FQRNIA. • indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission in the matter of WILLIAM X. ELIZOPIDQ All r. Chairman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of Calif. ATTES 00 Q� ' C� >—*e7c—rp toof the ontra Costa unty Pla iny Commission, State of Calif. Findings Map In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Approval to Submit to the State the Contra Costa County Mental - Health Final Budget for Fiscal Year 1977-1978. The Board on June 20, 1978 having received the Final Mental Health Budget from the Mental Health Director and Human Resources Director for fiscal year 1977-1978; and The Board, having reviewed said budget, having noted the disapproval by the State Department of Health of the County's application for $143,000 for the Crisis Service Unit, and further having noted the $1,666,579 of County overmatch in the Final Budget; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Final Mental Healthy Budget for fiscal year 1977-1978 is APPROVED and the Mental Health Director is HEREBY DIRECTED to submit the Final Budget to the State Department of Health. ' PASSED on June 27, 1978 by -the following vote:' : . AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, N. C. Fanden, E. H. Hasseltine, R. I. Schroder. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor W. N. Boggess. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Medical Director Supervisors . Mental Health Director affixed this 27th day of June . 1978 State Dept. of Health Mental Health Adv. Board County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By Deputy Clerk ROWle GutzlerrezCT . 00834 H-24 4/77 15m 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California ?7 1 zs_ June,, �, 9 In,the Matter of Request that_ County. Relinquish' -- . Development Rights Granted in connection-with M.S.. 79-76. # The .Board having received a June 21, 1978-letter- from Mr. Ted Sutton requesting that the County relinquish development rights granted (in connection with M.S. 79-76) by the previous owner to permit construction of a three-lot subdivision in the . Lafayette area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the Director of Planning for report. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a" order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC:: 2�Lz. T. Sutton Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27thJuneof June i978 Public Works Director Y County Administrator Public Information Officer OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl ow s3a H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California f y. June 27 , 19 In the Motter of__ _ Request for an Annual Allotment to be made to the Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum Wild Life Rescue Program. The Board having received a June 20, 1978"lettet from Mr. Reith Howard, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum, requesting that an annual allotment of $10,000 per year be made to the Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum Wide Life Rescue program out of the fund for the propagation and conservation of fish and game established pursuant to the State Fish and Game Code; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. , f 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of dh,order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. CC: Mr. R. Howard Witness my.hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisor County Administrator ffi27th June 78 Agricultural Commissioner axed this day of . 19 CJ R. OLSSON, Clerk 8y Deputy Cleric Ronda Amdahl H-24 4/77 15m 00 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 ' 197 In the Matter of Requesting Clerk to assign Time for Presentation. The Board having received a June 20, 1978 letter from Mr. James P. Pappas, Administrator, Los Medanos Community Hospital, outlining the circumstances surrounding the position - - of the Hospital District relative to the passage of Proposition.13 and requesting an opportunity to present said position in ,more detail when the Board of Supervisors deliberates the allocation of tax revenues; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Clerk is REQUESTED to assign time for the aforesaid presentation at a regular. or .specia-I meeting when financing of special districts from State: surplus funds is considered by the Board of Supervisors.. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 19780 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. y County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Mr. James P. Pappas Supervisors Administrator affixed this 27th day of--,Lt1e 19-M Los f4edanos Community Hospital G9e, 44j�- J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk &a*0ne M. Neufe H-24 4/77 15m 00,83". .� t ' LOS MEDANOS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT 550 SCHOM alm - PITTSSURG, CAUFORNIA 94565 BOARD OF DIRECTORS R E CR I E;{� 1�2-"4l Donald L Landrum tL_! V '.ju�P.r7�,�^� President �j�Zs,�,� NICHOLAS A. VENTRICL Arthur S. Chomor / � � A�Ir�11i111�IM 1 Secretary JUN iAI —)—I 1978 Arthur I. Roake. Jr. Treasurer J. R. OLSSON Lillian J. Pride CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS June 20, 1978: Paul E CorbinCONT COSTA CO. B - slzt _ Beau* Mr. Robert Schroder, Chairman County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street. Martinez, California 94553 Dear Mr. Schroder: I would like to take this opportunity to outline in general terms the cir- . cumstances surrounding the position of the Los Medanos Community Hospital District relative to the passage of Proposition 13 and the subsequent , allocation of tax revenues in Contra Costa County. The Los Medanos Community Hospital District has budgeted approximately 17 million dollars in construction costs for the completion of a new hospital- facility in Pit mob•-g. Construction was initiated approximately 1 1/2 years ago, and the new facility is 70% complete as of June, 1978. On March 2,' 1976, approximately 70% of the District electorate voted to increase the 204� tax rate to 500 per hundred dollars. The specific designation of the additional tax revenue was for the capital support of the construction project. The major financing mechanism for the construction was the issuance of building corporation bonds in the amount of $12,600,000. The remaining source of funds was constituted by the capital reserves of the District, both existing and anticipated funds from tax revenues. The text of the tax increase election measure is as follows: "Shall the maximum annual tax rate which Los Medanos Community Hospital District is in power to levy upon all property within the District, subject to taxation for District purposes, be increased for a not-to- exceed 30 years by thirty cents (301�) pex:,one hEndred dollars ($100) of assessed valuation for the object and purpose of capital outlay, namely the acquiring of a new hospital located in the District, including lands, easements, improvements, equipment, furniture, facilities and appurtenances necessary and convenient for the construction and improvement of said Hospital, said Hospital be acquired by lease or purchase or of any other financing method selected by the Board of Directors of the District." It is clear that the Los Medanos Community Hospital District is committed to the capital obligations established by the construction of the new hospital and that the overwhelming support of the electorate was established prior to this commitment. The anticipated bond service requirement of the Hospital District continues through :he fiscal year, 2003/04. The total amount of tax revenues necessary to meet the annual bond service and other capital commitments generated by the construction proje tV-3c)1978/79 fiscal year total $1,277,000.. . Y Microtilmod' with board orcioc r ' ' s Mr. Robert Schroder June 20, 1978 Page two Historically, the Hospital District has operated the- Hospital facility based upon a break-even financial posture. Sixty percent - (60%) of the revenues generated through operations are accounted for by Medicare and Medi-Cal patients and as such the contractual allowance for,hospital services is a significant reduction to operating revenue. . The over- all economic environment in the healthcare industry in recent years has vacillated back and forth between mandatory and voluntary rate controls and cost containment. This phenomenon is reflected 'i.n all levels of government and society in general. At the same time economic factors impacting hospitals' operations, and for which there is very little direct control by the hospital, continue to have. a dramatic inflationary impact upon hospital costs and rate structures. The 'completion of the new Hospital facility wikl have a dramatic impact upon the fixed overhead of hospital operations. This increase in operating expense is essentially uncontrollable and primarily reflects the inadegtiacy of the existing facility in providing. contemporary standards of healthcare services to the local community. I believe that the inadequacies of the existing facility are a matter of record. In summary, the Los Medanos Community Hospital District has entered into a financial obligation with the issuance of building corporation bonds, as well as the commitment of additional capital for the purpose of constructing a n=om hospital facility in.Pittsburg. The commitment of the Board of Directors of the Los Medanos Community Hospital District to this project was a considered decision and was made with the overwhelming support of the electorate. The financial obligations incurred as a consequence will require the reasonable allocation of tax revenues in support of the Hospital District's commitment of $1,277,000. in the 1978/79 fiscal year. I respectfully request an opportunity to present this position in more detail to the Board of Supervisors as it carries out its' delibera- tions relative to the crucial issues surrounding the allocation of tax revenues under Proposition 13. If I can be of any assistance to you in terms of answering specificquestions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Sincere , ames P. Pappas Administrator Los Medanos Community Hospital cc:-County Board of Supervisors: Mr. James Kenny Ms. Nancy Fanden Mr. Warren Boggess Mr. Eric Hasseltine Mr. Arthur Will 0839 —T 1 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA June 27, 1978 In the Matter of Rescission of Contract, Blackhawk ) Road Overlay, Danville Area ) Project No. 4331-4405-661-77 ) The Board on September 26, 1977 having awarded to Branaugh. T Excavating, Inc., the contract for the overlay of Blackhawk.Rcad, Danville area, with the contract special provisions stipulating that a Notice to Proceed might be delayed up to 20 days in order to allow for the completion of the asphalt concrete leveling course and frontage improvements by the developer for Subdivision 4878; and . i. The Public Works Director having reported that the developer was unable to complete his work on the project before the winter and that the work was recently completed in May of 1978; and The Public Works Director having further reported that because of the unexpected and lenothy postponement of the start of work and the rapid escalation of cows during the past eight months, Branaugh Excavating, Inc., has requested (1) a re-negotiation of contract prices which would increase the contract cost by $3,000, or (2) a rescission of the contract and reimbursement for bond and insurance costs; and The Public Works Director having further reported that County Counsel has advised that a re-negotiation of prices is improper inasmuch as there has been no change in the character of the work and has advised . his department that a rescission of the contract would be the proper course to follow to avoid court proceedings should a Notice to Proceed be issued; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an Agreement (Rescission of Contract) with Branaugh Excavating, Inc., is APPROVED and its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute same on behalf of the county. . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Auditor Controller is AUTHORIZED to issue a warrant in the amount of $850.00 to Branaugh Excavating, Inc. , the County's consideration for the Rescission Agreement. IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED that the Performance and Payment Bonds submitted to the County by Branaugh Excavating, Inc., are- EXONERATED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 00840 I hereby certify-that the foregoing is .a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board Originator: of Supervisors Affixed- this 27th day. of June 1978 Public Works Department Construction Division J. R. OLSSON, Clerk -By. Deputy Clerk ' Sandra L. T iel on cc: Public Works Director County Counsel County Auditor-Controller Branaugh Excavating-, Inc. 21483 Orange Avenue Castro Valley, California 94546 . S -2 00841 RECEIVED JUN 27 1973 � ma:, CLEziC 60AM. oOF SWERViSORS CONTRA C TA CO. B . 4GREEI-:EN T (RESCISSION OF- CONTRACT) 1. Effective ,Date and Parties. Effective on ..June 27 1978, the County of Contra Costa (herein called County) , a political sub- division of the State of California, and Branaugh Excavating, Inc. (herein called Contractor) mutually agree as follows: 2. Purpose. On September 26, 1977, the parties entered into .a contract under w�h ch the Contractor agreed to construct -and complete the asphalt concrete overlay on Blackhawk Road in the Danville Area (Project No. 4331-4405-661-77) , for a total contract price of $.24,555.00. Because of unforeseen delays, Contractor has not been able to begin work within the time contemplated by the parties pursuant to the above-mentioned contract, and has requested that such contract be rescinded. 3. Rescission. The above-mentioned contract of September 26, 1977 is here5y rescinded. 4. Consideration. The Contractor hereby agrees to release, ,hold harmless, and defend the County, its officials and employees from all claims, demands, and causes of act-ion zor any and all damages arising out of said contract, as consideration for the County's consent to the rescission of said con- tract. The County agrees to pay to the Contractor the sum of eight hundred fiftv dollars ($850.00) and to exonerate:he Contractor' s performance and payment bonds. BRANAUGH EXCAVATING, INC. , COUNTY RA COSTA r By: v�'�l •C3'. By::at R.!.Schroder Contractor '.,c, airman, Board of Supervisors State of California ) ss. County of �p= �, �. ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk The person(s) signing above for Contractor, known to me in individual and business By: 4 capacity as stated, personally D puty ' appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they APPROVAL RECOMMENDED: executed it and that the cor- poration named above executed By• it. F1'.- Public Work irecto Dated: '4- /6- 7 PORM APPROVED: -717� JOH14 B CLAUSEN, County Counsel / By: 1 a. Notary Publ4 Deputy OFFICiAr, ZEAL f. jSEAL GGS CaLIFOR,NIA Microfilmed with bomrd o:dar SM:s �_. ai,r.i_ae, cep M , ...,ccn ex-i-23 MAY 25, 197 O8 A S2 t C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 In the Matter of Proposed Application with State . Department of Benefit Payments. The Board on June 20, 1978 having referred to- its Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. Hasseltine and N. C. Fanden) a request from the Human Resources Agency that it be permitted to apply for State funds for the purpose of establishing a Forms Management Demonstration Project; and The Committee having this day reported that the project would attempt to demonstrate that a Forms Management Program can result in an improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness with which welfare services are administered, that the Social Service Department will continue to make available as a part of the project those staff and services presently devoted to forms man- agement, an- agement, and that this application results in no increase in county funds and no change in responsibility for any presently assigned county staff; and The Committee having therefore recommended that the appli- cation to the State Department of Benefit Payments be approved and the Chairman be authorized to execute same; and IT IS BY THE BOARD SO ORDERED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director, Human Resources Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Agency Supervisors Social Service affixed this27th day of_ Jane . 19 78 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y ', i Deputy Clerk cine M. Ne d H-24 4177 15m 00843 The Board of Supervisors Contra James COUnly °'� County Cterk and �y County Administration Building Costa Officio Clerk of the Board o ta MM��kiieRossell P.O.Box 911 Chief perk Martinez.California 94553 County (415)372-2371 James P.Kenny-Richmond 1st District Nancy C.Fanden-Martinez 2rc District Robert 1.Schroder-Lafayette 3rd District Warren N.Boggess-Concoro -m District Eric H.Hassettine-Pittsburg nth District JUNE 22, 197$ REPORT OF FINANCE COMMITTEE ON THE PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A COUNTY FORMS MANAGEMENT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT On June 20, 1978 the Board referred to our Committee a request from the Human Resources Agency that they be permitted to apply for $36,606 of State money for the purpose of establishing a Forms Manage- ment Demonstration programa This project would attempt to demonstrate that a Forms Management Program can result in an improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness with which welfare services .are administered. The Social Service Department will continue to make available as a part of the project those staff and services presently devoted to forms management. This amounts to an in-kind value of $42,666. When the State funds which would be requested by this proposal are added to the in-kind contribution the total Forms Management program would total $79,272. This application results in no increase in County funds and no change in responsibility for any presently assigned County staff. - The Finance Committee therefore recommends that the Board of Supervisors endorse the application and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement with the State Department of Benefit Payments. Eric H. Hasseltine Nancy C. Fanden Supervisor, District V Supervisor,'-District II 00844 A4krofilmpd with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa- County, State of California JUN 2 7 1978 , 19 In the Matter of Agreement f29-012 with the State Department of Benefit Payments to establish a County Forms Management Demonstration Project IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Agreement 729-012 with the State Department of Benefit Payments (State #CMU-17300) to provide $36,606 in State funding from June 1, 1978 through May 31, 1979, to establish a County Forms-Management Demonstration Project operated by the County Social. Service Department, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said agreement. PASSED BY THE BOARD on ,JUN 2 7 1978, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entared on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Graats Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed thb day of JUN 271978 19 County Auditor-Controller County Social Service State Department _ J. R- OLSSON, Cleric of Benefit Payments Deputy Clerk H-24 4/77 15m ❑ CONTRACTOR STANDARD AGREEMENT — AT.ORNEY --NERAL ❑ STATE AGENCY • STATE OF.CALIFORNIA STD, 2 IREv. II/75, ❑ DEPT, OF CEN, SER. ❑ CONTROLLER THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 31st day of clay ' 19 75 ❑ in the State of California. by and between State of California, through its duly elected or appointed, ❑ qualified and acting ❑ CIID -173J0 TITLE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE AGENCY NU`.19ER Director Department of Benefit Payments (Social Servic ) hereafter called the Suite,and Contra Costa County (for its Social Service Department) 2 9 ® 0 12 hereafter called the Contractor. WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed, does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials, as follows: (Set forth service to be rendered by Contractor•amount to be paid Contractor,time for perforrtwnce or completion,and attach plans and specifications,if any.) I . Contractor agrees to: A. Enter into this Agreement with the State for the purpose of establishing a Derl�nstration Project to design a centralized Forms tlanagement Program. B. Follow the format identified in the "County Forms Project Narrative," (Attachment A) which is attached and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. II . The naximum amount of this Agreement is $36,606. Ill . The State agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in arrears, and upon submission of proper invoices in duplicate to Demonstration Projects Bureau, 744 P Street, Mail Station 12-96, Sacramento, CA 95814, an amount not to exceed the maximum anount of this Agreement. FORM APPROVED IV. The tern of thi s Agreement i s from June 1 , 1973 through May 31 , 1979.1OHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel :tL.LE�;TA. JR. The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement. "moi-17ebV�t 1V. 4 IN 1WITNESS ;WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto, upon the date first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ONTRACTOR AGENCY CONTRACT AN AN INDIVIDUAL. STATE %"rTNCR A CORPORATION PARTNCRSNI Department of Benefit Payments Social Contr C f ant Social Service Dept. BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATUnE• Services) BY lA R NATURE) TITLE TIT IVE Chairman, Board of Supervisors- Deputy upervisorsDe ut Director Administration ADDRESS ICONTINUED ON_S�EET'Z. EACH EIEAaING NAM= O- CONTRACTOR) 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 Department of General Services I Am. 0LINT EN CUNI BER ED APPROPRIATION FUND Use ONLY � S 6 606.00 UNENCUM9EREO 13ALANCE ITEM CHAPTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR 11S A,^,J, ENCUM11ANCC FUNCTION S ADJ. DECREASIN^ ENCUMBRANCE LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT I hereby certify upon my own personal knowledge that budgeted fund. T.B.A. NO. R. NO. are available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above 51GNA TUBE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER DATE 1 hereby certify that all conditions for exemption set forth in State Administrative.Manual Section 1209 have been complied with and this document is exempt from review by the Department of Finance. SIGNATURE OF OFFICER SIGNING ON B=HALF OF THE AGENCY DATE U01111111au Wan tb5o5ard or or "BACKSIDE C S--D. 2++ 1. The Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and eniployees from any and all claims and losses accruing or.resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, rnaterialmen, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation fumishing or supplying work, services, materials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation ),%-ho may be injured or damaged by the Contractor in the performance of this contract. 2. The Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in i the.performance of this agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of State of California- 3. alifornia.3. The State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail.to,perform the covenant-,herein_contained at the time and. in the inannerherein-providecL In the event of such termination the;State,may.proceed with the work- in any manner deemed proper by the State. Ile cost to the State shall be deducted from anv sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid the Contractor upon demand_+ 4. Without the written consent,of the,SLate, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor, either in whole or in part. S. Time is the es}ence of this a,,reemeDL 6. ,\o alteration or variation_of_the,terms of this contrjet shall.be_vand unless made in writing and-signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shallhe binding on any of the parties hereto, 7. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein, shall be in co_rnpensation for - - - all of Contractors expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel land per diem, unless otherwise expressly so provided. _ __. _ _ _ - _ . -- ---- - - - -2- V. Upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party, either party may terminate this Agreement. VI . This Agreanent may be amended by mutual consent in writing. VII . The Fair Enployment Practice/Civil Rights Addendum is attached and hereby in- corporated into and made a part of this Agreement. Vill . This Agreement will be valid and enforceable during fiscal year 1973/79 only if sufficient funds are made available by the Budget Act of 1973. VIX. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations or conditions enacted by the Legislature and contained in either of the above Budget Hills or any statute enacted by the Legislature which may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner. X. In addition, if the Budget Act of 1973 does not appropriate sufficient funds for the proaran for fiscal year 1978/79, this Agreement shall be invalide and of no further force and effect. In either event the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to the Contractor or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and the Contractor shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement. X1 . The Department of Benefit Payments, a party to this Agreement, will be known (as of 1 , July, 1973) as the Department of Social Services (DSS). DSS will be held to Lne terms of said Agreement. XII . The State reserves the right to review service levels and billing procedures as the impact charges against this Agreement. XIII . The "Backside of Std. 2" is attached and hereby incorporated into this Agreement by reference. XIV. Attachment B, "Budget Schedule," is attached and incorporated into this Agreement by reference. • FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES/CIViL RIGHTS ADDENDUM Fair Employment Practices 1. In the performance of this contract, the Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, age, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment,- without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, age, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment•, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, in- eluding apprenticeship. The Contractor shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the State setting forth the provisions of this Fair Employment Practices section. 2. The Contractor will permit access to his records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the State Fair Employment Practices Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the awarding authority, for the purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment Practices section of this contract. Civil Rights 1. Pursuant to state and federal law, the Contractor shall provide all services, financial aid and benefits without- regard to race, color, national origin, political affiliation, religion, marital status, or sex. 2. Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-112), the Contractor agrees that no otherwise qualified handicapped individual shall , solely by reason of a handicap, be excluded from the participation in, be - denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in the performance of this contract. Remedies for Villful Violation 1. The State may determine a willful violation of the Fair Employment Practices provision of this addendum to have occurred upon receipt of a final judgment having that effect from a court in an action to which Contractor was a party, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair Employment Practices Commission that has investigated and determined that the Contractor has violated the Fair Employment Practices Act and has issued an order, under Labor Code Section 1425, which has become final, or obtained an injunction � under Labor Code Section 1429. 2. For willful violation of the Fair Employment Practices/Civil Rights provisions, the State shall have the right to terminate this contract either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by the State in securing the goods or services hereunder shall be borne and paid for by the Contractor and by his surety under the performance bond, if any, and the State may deduct from any inoneys due or that thereafter may become due to the Contractor, the difference between the price named In the contract and the actual cost thereof to the State. 008.49 ATTACH.YENT A County Forms Project Narrative A. I. Project Title: County Forms Management Demonstration Project A.2. Project Objective: The purpose of the project is to demonstrate that setting up a forms management program, which is administratively separated from line welfare program activities, can result in an improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration welfare services. The objective will be obtained by applying current forms management techniques to the county welfare system. B.1. Background, The Problem Area: Many criticisms of the welfare system zero in on the excessive amounts of paperwork that the system has generated. The Commission on Federal Paperwork has noted that excess paperwork in welfare programs is a direct result of many categorized aid programs piling over the years on top of one another. Each attempts to serve a similar population, but each generates its own set of accountabilities and controls. This results in unnecessary program complexity and excessive costs. The heart of the paperwork problem can be attacked only through welfare reform. However, the use of modern forms management techniques can do a great deal to alleviate the results of these problems by improving the quality of the paperwork itself. California county welfare departments use forms created and supplied by the state as the main information source for administratering welfare programs. These are usually supplemented by county forms in an attempt to make a statewide system fit local administrative and organizational conditions. For example, one small county supplants its state forms in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children application and grant determination process with 14 county forms and one large county uses 80 additional county forms for the same process. Although the higher number of forms in the larger county is due to a more complex organi— zation and its resulting division of labor, there is probably much room for cutting the paperwork in both small and large counties through better program planning. Furthermore, many county forms are developed entirely within the line programs by people with no knowledge of advanced-forms design and technology and little understanding of each form's impact on the entire county system. Program people know their program so well, that their knowledge often blinds them to how bad forms can act as communication barriers and hazards mor smooth and effective administration. Large government agencies need experts with specific knowledge of the form as an administrative tool who can work with program experts to develop good paperwork systems. Although many counties have groups entitled Forms Management Units, most of these units do little more than assign numbers and direct procurement and reproduction. 1 00�'5U B.2. Current Approaches to the Forms Problem: Many corporations, especially those dealing -with heavy amounts of paperwork such as banks, insurance companies and chain retailers, have long recognized the need for an independent unit to plan and implement quality paperwork. Many such forms analysts and coordinators are industrial engineers, who use a number of systems techniques to reduce the costs of paperwork. The California State Legislature recognized this in passing Senate Bill 269 in 1975. This set up a State Forms Management Center, which would in turn, help government agencies to set up strong, analytically oriented forms management programs. In an attempt to bring this mandate to the county level, where much of the welfare paperwork is generated, this department has organized a Forms Analysis and Management Workshop, in conjunction with the State Forms Management Center, for county welfare departments. This has had success in bringing many modern forms techniques to county staff and the beginnings of stronger programs in several counties. The project would aid one county to develop a full fledged program, in order to better demonstrate the full potential of savings and program improvement. C.I. Research Methodology, Hypothesis: 1. A centralized forms management program, using such techniques as functional and recurring data analysis 1/ to study current eligibility processes in terms of its forms, can reduce the anount of forms (and therefore the amount of time and potential cost) used in those processes. 2. A centralized forms management program, using modern techniques of forms design and technology, can improve the quality of individual forms and form series with a measurable decrease in form processing time. 3. A centralized forms management program can, through control of district office bootlegging (unauthorized, unplanned and localized form develop- ment and reproduction) and planned procurement techniques reduce the cost of reproducing and procuring forms. 4. A centralized forms management program can, through language analysis techniques, improve client communications, by simplifying the language in welfare forms to client reading levels. C.2. Experimental and Control Groups: Research techniques using experimental and control groups are not easily applicable to this project. l/ Functional analysis is used to file similar forms together by subject and purpose. Recurring data analysis uses a grid to measure the potential of similar forms for elimination or coobination. 2 00851 C.3. Acceptance and Rejection of Hypothesis: The first three hypotheses will be measured by a costing plan developed by the county with the aid of the state. The plan gathers current repro- duction and printing costs, staff costs, mailing costs and uses standard office procedure time and motion statistics to develop reductions in costs before and after forms elimination or revision through_analysis. The plan will be applied to individual'reductions and improvements in forms to measure if actual and potential dollar savings over a year's time are greater than the additional cost of a centralized forms management program. If so, the project will be successful. The fourth hypothesis will be measured on selected forms using the Fog and Fry Indices (see Appendix I) of the determining reading and vocabulary levels for written materials. If forms are reduced to the client's education level 2/, an improvement in communications can be assumed. C.4. The Work Plan: Task Responsibility Time Span 3/ (1) Selection of county County Management First month staff including: a. Forms Analyst b. Forms Technician c. Project Forms Clerk (2) Training of county staff State Department of Second month in forms design. General Services (DGS) (3) Training of forms staff Department of Benefit Second month in forms analysis tech- Payments (DBP) during niques/and cost evalua- DGS training tions. (4) Lease of composer County machine. (5) Develop and publish County Forms Analysts First and second county forms guidance month procedures. 2/ 21Z of AFDC mothers and 37% of AFDC fathers have not gone beyond the 9th grade. (BDP's AFDC Social and Economic Characteristics of Families Receiving Aid During May 1975, January 1975.) However, Arany forms are written at college level. 3/ The project starting date will commence upon final approval of the project contract. 3 00852 Task Responsibility Time Span (6) Develop and implement County Forms Analysts Second month publicity campaign on the project and resulting expansion of forms services. (Management Letters and Branch Office Presentations). (7) Collection and listing of County Forms Technicians Second month all county official and unofficial forms. (8) Bring bootlegged County Forms Analysts Second month (unofficial) forms into the county system. (4) Development of county County Forms Analysts, Second and third cost-savings guidelines. DBP Forms Analysts month (10) Develop program files County Forms Analysts=, Second month for county form. Technicians (11) Develop functional County Forms Analysts, Second month and file for county forms: Technicians third month (12) Provide design and County Forms Analysts Second month - analysis services on Duration of Project request from users. (13) Do cost savings analysis County Forms Analysts, Second month of all forms altered by Technicians Duration of Project the group during the project. - (14) Analyze and evaluate County Forms Analysts Third month. forms by district and category to deter- mine areas in greatest need of revision. (15) Prioritize areas of County Forms Analyst/ Third month greatest need. County Management (16) Discuss and plan County Forms Analysts; Third month schedule for improving Program Management forms in first priority. (17) Begin to implement County Forms Analysts; Third month- first priority program Technicians, Program Duration of Project form changes. Management (18) Discuss and plan schedule County Forms Analysts; Third month - for improving other major Program Management Duration of Project. priority areas. 4 00853 Task Responsibility Time Span (19) Perform ongoing recurring County Forms Analysts, Third month - data analysis and fora Technicians Duration of Project consolidation - based on program priority. (20) Survey of all staff for Forms Technicians, Third month - potentially obsolete Forms Analysts Duration of Project forms. Decision to (County) eliminate the forms. (21) Provide ongoing review County Fora Analysts, Third month - of forms to be reprinted, Technicians Duration of Project for format, design and CP language. (22) Analyze cost-benefit County Forms Analysts, Sixth and seventh of using alternate DBP and DGS Analysts month printing sources and contract printing A/- (23) Provide monthly consul- DBP; DGS Analysts, First through tation on project Demonstration Project twelfth month progress. (24) Prepare monthly County Forms Analysts First through progress reports. twelfth month (25) Prepare final evaluation County Forms Analysts, Sixty days after and report. DRP Analysts twelfth month C.5. Data Collection: Couaty will maintain data on the following throughout project. (1) number of forms brought into a controlled system, and the savings in photocopying, and staff time, generated by so doing. (2) 2Iumber of forms eliminated through project actions (such as functional analysis) and subsequent savings. (3) Number of forms eliminated through survey of potentially obsolete forms and subsequent savings in form processing and handling. (4) A thorough cost-savings analysis of each major fora revision and redesign undertaken by the forms management unit. (5) A brief cost analysis of the savings of minor revisions and redesigns. 4/ Contract printing requires ordering all forms with a similar technological format together and ahead of printing time. This riethod allows for better scale economics when ordering paper stock. 5 00854 (6) The accumulation of each month, and at the end of the project, of the design and revision savings in (k) and (5). (7) An estimate of other potential yearly savings such as alternate printing sources and contract buying. (8) Data on improvement in forms languages clarity using Fog and Fry Index analysis of major county form revisions which make extensive use of writing. C.6. Data Collection Procedures: (1) Cost savings data will be based on guidelines and plans developed by county and state at the beginning of the Project, and applied to each major form change; eliminations and consolidation. This data will be accumulated each month. The guidelines are based on draft cost savings guidelines currently used by DBP. (2) Potential savings of using alternate printing sources, if appropriate, will be based on projections of potential savings. D.1 Resources, Resumes: Resumes of project staff will be supplied in the final report. D.2 Resource Funding: Contra Costa County will provide one analyst (half-time) and one technician. The state will fund an additional analyst and forms technician for the duration of the project. The Department of Benefit Payments will contract with the Department of General Services for aid in project evaluation and monitoring. All Benefit Payments staff time Will be funded out of normal administrative allocations. E. Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation will be made through analyses and arraying of the cost savings data supplied for form eliminations and revisions in monthly project reports. In addition, the final report will provide a'narrative. descrip- tion of project strategies, successes and failures, and attempt to record, through use of planned interviews, the impact of centralized forms manage- ment on county staff. 6 APPENDIX 1 • FOG AND �RY INDICES AdaptlnR Fry and Fol Inliccs to Forms To adapt Fry and Fog readability tests to forms: 1. Only test forms with at least 100 cords in complete sentences per page. 2. If the form page contains many more than 100 words per page in complete sentences, select the middle portion to count out the words. Otherwise, start at the top of the page. (See Directions A.1). 3. Oaly count words and syllables conteined*in complete sentences. 4.' If the form has more than one page, do P- ;turd count for each _page, than 1 average. However, use the reading level for each page to adjust any T - _ great discrepancies between one page and another. - • 5. Using the above adaptations, follow the attached standard directions for school texts. �- - 0085 • :ttiacih . ' •Dircctians ".•o Determine Readability: A. To determine Fry Readability level.• Divide book. into 1/3's, then take 'the middle page of each 1/3. Select a passage of aLout 100 words on the middle page(s) of each 1/3. Suggest that the passage selected begin with first word of a paragraph. (Try to select a passage that has little - or no dialogue or direct quotations) 2. $Sark out all proper nouns (=iaey) and numerical notations (3.9-78) found in the passage. - 3. Place a mark. (/) before the first word of the passage; count • 100 words and place another mar"' '(/) . Remember to exclude all proper nouns and numerical notations. 4. Count the nu-*^.ber of conmlete sentences in the passage and enter the number in Colu::Ln 03 of Worksheet A. • 5. Frequently, the 100 word count will end in 'the middle of a _sentence. Table Y is used to compute the sentence length of the final sentence included in the 100 word count to the nearest • 10th of a sentence. The procedure for using Table Y is: -.count all the cords in the complete final sentence of the reading passage::and: enter 'the number of words in { Column 0Y of tForkshezt A. count the number of words in the complete final sentence • up to the 100 c=ord mark (/) and-enter the number in - Coluiran 15 of Worksheet A. - turn to Table Y; locate the number from Column 2W4 of Worksheet A 'on the extreme left hand column of Table Y; next, locate the nimber from Column 05 of Worksheet A along the top of Table Y; place markers (fingers cork _ quite well) under the numbers just located on Table Y, move across and down the table to a point where the row • , and column intersect; read the decimal fraction at. the •- -• inteisecti-on of the two points and enter that decimal fraction in Column r6 of Sorksheet A. ' 6. Add Columms @3 and -06 of Worksheet A and enter the sum in Col.unn 07. The sum will probably be a whole number and a ecii:tal number (i.e. , 6.3) unless the 100 word mark (/) and the end of the sentence happen to coincide. '7. Next, count the number of syllables in the reading passage. Each word has at least one syllable; tally the total numbler of syllables in the 100 word passage and enter the number in Colur.m a R of. W=orksheet it. O { ,-- Turn to Table Y. Locate the nt:mber of syllables (Column ,�3) � iptt�-! along the extreme le=ft column -of Table s and mark. Foll.o:a � across the line to the numwer which is immediately lass than the number, of sentences (Column 107) in the reading passage. Look. at the top of the column to find the reading difficulty level. Enter tiie reading difficulty level, in Column 4_9 of _) Worksheet 'A. - Repeat the 10-step procedure above for the passages chosen from the middle of the boot: and the last third of the book.. The average reading difficulty level of the. book can be deter- mined by totaling Colu.nn x9 and dividing by 3. Sometimes great variability is encountered either in sentence length or in the syllable count for the 100 word passage. Should this occur, it is suggested that three additional passages be selected and subjected to the procedure outlined above. ' Should the ratio of syllables to sentences fall outside Table } X, -the reading difficulty level cannot be computed. B. To determine Fog Index. _ - ' 1. For the sante sample, count the number of words until t e sample ends in a sentence. Therefore, you will have 100 or 100+11 and enter this figure on Line A. 2. Next, 'count the number of sentences in the sample and enter this on Line B.• 3. Divide the number of words' by the number of words in the • sample and enter this figure on Line C (carry out the division -to nearest tenth) . ' • 4. Count the number of words of three syllables or. more in • the first 100 %,►ords in the sample. Do not•.count (a) .cords that are capitalized; (b) cords that are combinat_o^s of easy ;cords (like butterfly and bookkeeper) (c) verb forms made into three syllables by adding -ed or -es (like - created or trespassed) . This gives you the percentage of hard words in the passage, and the second figure of your formula. 5. Add figures in Columns C and D and enter this figure on Line E. 6. . Multiply this figure by .4 and enter this figure on Line F. 00858 . Fart A • M.N. Publisher Title Recommended Grade Level Col. 1 Col. 2 Col . 3 Col . 4 Col . 5 Col. 6 Col . 7 Reading Page Numbe-r of Number Words Number of Fraction of Total Sentences Pazsage Complete in Final Words to Sentences (Add Col . 03 Sentences Sentence Mark (/) (See Table Y) and 46) Col. 8 Col. 9 Col . 10 Average Reading Difficulty of the Book (Divide total Number of Calculated Total of of Column 99 by 3) • Syllables Reading 3 Entries Difficulty in Col . 9 Level A. Nu.T.ber . of words in the sample B. Number of sentences in the sample C. Average sentence length (AB) D. Number of hard words in the sample E. ' Average sentence length + no. ofhard words (C+D) F. Fog Reading level (E x . 4) t TABLE X ./ ' [Coj]l /toIh� 1;1ffIC9LIY UM: GRADLc12 17117110�98 ' 7b 5 4 3-2 3-1 2-2 2-1 1 P PP NUI;:EP. OF SENTENZES PEP ]GO MRUS 100 6.7 7.5 9.2 15.0 20.0 50.0 102 6.1 6.9 7.9 9.4 15.8 22.5 50.0 104 5.8 6.3 7.1 8.3 9.4 16.7 25.0 50.0 105 6.1 6.7 7.3 8.7 9.8 17.8 27.5 50.0 i 108 5.0 5.7 6.5 7.1 7.5 9.2 10.0 19.0 30.0 50.0 110 5.2 5.9 6.7- 7.3 8.1 9.5 10.5 20.0 33.0 50.0 112 5.5 6.2 7.0 7.5 8.7 9.8 118.1 21.0 36.0 50.0 114 4.3 5.6 6.4 7.2 7.9 9.1 10.2 11.8 22.5 39.0 50.0 116 4.4 5.8 6.7 7.4 8.3 9.S 10.6 12.5 24.0 42.0 50.0 118 4.6 6.0 6.9 7.Z 8.8 9.9 11.2 13.4 25.5 50.0. 120 3.6 4.8 6.3 7.1 8.1 9.3 10.4 11.8 14.3 27.0 122 3.7 5.0 6.5 7.3 8.6 9.6 111.0 .12.5 15.3 124 3.8 5.2 6.8 7.5 9.2 10.0 11.6 12.9 16.3 126 4.0 5.4 7.0 8.0 9.6 10.5 12.3 14.1 17.3 128 4.2- 5.6 7.2 8.5 . 10.0 11.1 13.0 15.4 18.3 133 3.6 4.3 5.8 7.6 9.0 10.5 11.8 14.0 16.4 20.3 32 3.7 4.5 6.3 8.1 9.5 11.1 i2.5 15.0 17.5 22.3 v, 134 3.9 4.7 6.6 8.6 10.0 11.8 13.4 16.3 19.3 25.0 Lu s 135 4.1 5.1 7.0 9.2 10.5 12.5 .4.3 17.7 21.0 c 138 4.3 5.2 7.2 9.6 1.1 13.4 15.5 19.3 23.0 140 1 4.5 5.5 7.5 0.0 11.8 14.3 16.7 1.0 25.0 tt 142 3.6 4.8 5.9 7.8 ` 0.6 2.0 5.5 8.2 •S.0 n 144 3.7 5.1 6.3 9.2 41.3 z 146 4.1 5.4 6.7 10.0 X2.5 148 3.E 4.5 5.3 7.2 .0.8 150 3.8 4.8 6.3 7.9 - 152 4.1 5.2 6.3 8.7 154 3.6 4.4 5.8 7.5 - 155 4.0 4.8 5.5 8.3 158 3.6 4.2 5.2 7,4 160 3.7 4.7 5.7 8.3 162 3.6 4.1 5.2 6.4 164 3.6 4.5 5.7 7.1 166 3.6 5.1 6.4 163 3.6 5.8 7.1 170. * 3.6 6.7 - 00S TABLE t COMPUTING SE14TENCES TO THE NEAREST TENTH Number of words included in the 100 word count 1 2 3 Q 5 6 7 8 9 10 ' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 28 i9 30 3,{ .3 .7 - r,1 511 2 .4 .6 .8 -- ,. .2 .3 .5 .7 .8 7; , 1 .3 .4 .6 .7 .9 •- 2 . 1 .3 .4 .5 .6 ,7 .9 -- :�� . 1 .2 .3 .4 .6 .7 .8 .9 -- lE1 . 1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 -- .3 11 . 1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 -_ 12 . 1 .2 .3 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .7 .8 .9 -- .1 .2 .2 .3 .4 .5 .5 .6 .7 .8 .8 .9 -- i� , 1 . 1 .2 .3 .4 .4 .5 .6 .6 .7 .8 .9 ,9 -- 1,. .1 , 1 .2 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .G .7 .7 .8 .9 .9 -- . 1 .1 . .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .9 .9 -- 171 . 1 . 1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .8 .8 '.9 .9 -- 1? .2 .2 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9• -- 1'74 ,1 ,1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .3 .8 .9 .9 -- 2: .i . 1 .2 .2 .3 :3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 -- 21. 0 , 1 . 1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 1 .0 -- �_ 0 . 1 , 1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 23 0 .1 . 1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 G. .6 .7 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9 1.0 -- �' 2 0 .1 . 1 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6' .6 .7 .7 .7 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 -- , 2=. 0 .1 ..1 .2 .2 .2' .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 .6 .6 .7 .7 '.8 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 -- 25 0 . 1 .1 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 .7 .7 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 -- 21" 0 . 1 .1 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 G 6 6. 7 7 7 8 8 8 9 9 1 .0 -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2%. 0 .1 .1 .2 .2 .2 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6 .6 .6 .7 .7 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 .9 1 .0 -- 29. 0 .1 .1 .2 .2 ,2 ,3 .3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .6 ,6 ,6 .7 .7 .7 ,7 .8 .8 .8 .9 .9 .0 -- �3J 0 . 1 . 1 . 1 .2 .2 ,2 ,.3 .3 .3 .4 .4 .4 .5 .5 .5 .6 ,6 .6 ►7 .7 .7 .8 .8 .8 .9 ,9 ,9 1 .0 -- G a , - Projoct ho_.` E'UDSET SCHEDULE'.'-m- B� ?e:icd x/1/78 to .S_"/30%19 5 'C. -,--J Cr f'EFSrJ`:\ L COSTS _ FU.`.DS SUPPLIED FUNDI % OF TIME BY APPLICANT REOUES i=D BY POSITION' TITLE/GRADE/ANNUAL SALARY ON PROJECT AGENCY DOP TOTAL �) (2) (3) (4) (5) A. Projccc Director (ASA III) $24;393 10% $ 2,439 .0 $ 2,439 9. Sr. -7o--ms lnalyst rAA I) ' - $16,500 - 50% $ 8,250. .'�• ; $ 8,250 C. Proj . :or:as Analyst (AA I) -$14,976 100% $14,976 $ 14,.976 D. Forms ieCllnlCldn (Sr. Clerk) $12;024 ' 100$ : $12,024 - �; $� 12,024- E. Form, s Technician (ITC Clerk) :$10,644 . 100% J�. $10-,64jt-,- `: $ 10,644•-- =. Sup Cl=rti (SC I) $14,040 10% : -$ -1,404 --1;404 Fri.ge eenefi;s $11,502 $ 6,700 $ 18,202 R=uARKSi=X?L-A`4ATION OF FRINGE BENEFIT PATE: Benefit rate varies between classifications. Average bene'-Fit rate is 25.5%. For (C) the rate is 24.20% and for (E) 25.5%. : .. 16. SC".".JL- OF Tc,AVEL CC-STS (_) _..;?cou^.ty travel $ 150 $ -150 `.(b) Travel to Sacramento,(4 persons) . .5 round -trips $ - 115 (c) Per dicm in Sacramento, 4 per.X 5 days $40/pe_ $ 800 $ 800 17. OTi-i=n (emlze) _ _;,__ens/=Urniture. Cor..Doser Lease -- . $. .-3,02l-.',---- $-. . 3,021- . T?`d Composer Darts our—cries - 200. ... $ _. . ..200 !B-M Selectri c " $ 155 __ __ ' $ —155_ . ... D=ss,cia-Ys,bcokcase (;.) (3) (C) $. . 155 - - -- $ . . :_255... L-asks,chairs,filing cabinet (D) (E) (F) Prorated $ 388 $ . 388 S^=^.e%�• ''1'�S1anC-_' Costes roratee S 6-349 13. TOTAL I AL EUDGC l $42,666 $- 36;666 $ 79;272 ' . J3? BUDGET REV!Cil: 00 PAG!: 2 OF In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 7g In the Matter of Appointment to the Citizens Advisory Committee for County Service Area R-9. Supervisor N. C. Fanden having recommended that_ Ms. Carolyn Poage, 2563 Patra Drive, El Sobrante, California 94803 be appointed to the Citizens Advisory Committee for County Service Area R-9 to fill the unexpired term of Ms. Barbara Bernardin ending December 31, 1979; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Fanden is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Hoard of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of CC: Ms. Poage SupervisorsCitizens Advisory Cte. xeci this 27thJuneof June . 1978 via Service Area Coordinat& y Service Area Coordinator Public Tiorks Director ,!. R. OLSSON; Clerk County AdministratorLLL Public Information Officer NZonda Deputy Clerk Amdahl H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 1978 In the Matter of Approving and Authorizing Payment for Property Acquisition. Hilltop Drive, Project No. 0872-4415-663-77, Federal No. HHS-A768 (1), E1 Sobrante Area IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement and Right of Way Contract for Hilltop Drive realignment project, E1 Sobrante area, is APPROVED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said Contract on behalf of-the County: Contract Payee and Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount Corporation of the 6-6-78 Western Title Insurance $7,666.00 Presiding Bishop of Co. the Church of Jesus Escrow Number M-310847-2 Christ of Latter Day 821 Main St. Saints Martinez, CA 94553 The County Auditar-Cantroller is AUTHORIZED to draw a warrant in the amount specified to be delivered to the County Principal Real Property Agent, The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept Deed from above-named Grantor for the County of Contra Costa. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Real Property Division affixed this 27th ay of .T„n o 19 7 cc: County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Sa►zdra L. hel on- 00 H-24 4177 15m r C In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 -M In the Matter of - Approval of Final Alcohol Program Budget for FY 1977/78 and Alcohol Contract Amendments The Board on May 30, 1978, having authorized the Director, Human Resources Agency, to conduct contract amendment negotiations with specified. alcohol service contractors, and having directed the Alcohol Program Chief to prepare a revised FY 1977/78 Alcohol Program Budget simultaneously with amendment negotiations to include offsetting program amounts, and the Alcohol ism .Advisory Board having considered and approved the revised FY 1977/78 Alcohol Program Budget, IT IS BY .THE BOARD ORDERED that the revised FY 1977/78 Alcohol Program Budget is hereby approved, and further, that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to execute contract amendments as specified below: AMENDMENT NEW PAYMENT EFFECTIVE NUMBER CONTRACTOR INCREASE LIMIT DATE 24-743-2 East County Community $ 6,150 $124,817 5/1/78 Detoxication Center 24-722-11 Bi-Rett, Inca 25,888 479,628 7/1/77 and that the Chairman of the Board is authorized to execute the following contract amendment upon approval as to form by County Counsel : 24-739-2 National Council on $ 200 $ 30,636 7/1/77 Alcoholism--Bay Area, Inc. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of do order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Maness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 County Auditor-Controller County Medical Director J. R. OLSSON; Clerk Mental Health_ Director / _p Contractors Byc�,- to t2 ��� ��puty Clerk Jamie L. Johnson agm H-2 4/77 15m l CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, California C. L. Van ltarter, Director Dare: June 20, 1978 Human Resources Agency From: Jel ' ,Ja Subiect: Final Alcoholism Program Y Al coi p L./rogra a Chief Budget FY 1977-78 I an, submitting to you a copy of the final Alcoholism Program Budget FY 1977-78 for submission to the Board of Supervisors for their con- sideration and approval . The Budget reflects the contract amendments ( which are being funded by internal program adjustments (a ac e Hence no new monies are being requested other than those already approved by the Board of Supervisors FY 1977-78. As you know, the Alcoholism Program receives 90/10 funding. Attached is a copy of the final allocation. JN:ds Attachments A-50 2M 4/77 Microlurned with board order CONT4.A COSTA COU:iT','' :hci)ICA 230 AI.+a,nb,a;,ver:ue Mar.i:t3,, Cc:i:Z:n,u Tu: L: ai s C . Pa%ca '. 1 i , Jr. Lam'= 4 may, 73 kit!ntal Hcalth Adninistrator Cre^=Jerry ;`a ` :� i� Contract Amendment Alcohol {T s-rL=, Dol,raM Chief Request 1 am requesting your assistance in proce5sing the following contract amendments (attached) . The monies are contained in the current Alcoholism Program Budget FY 1977-78 which was approved by the Board of Supervisors 23 JAN 78. The proposed changes will be refd.ected in the final Alcoholism Program Budget revision FY 1977-78. No Board of Supervisors approval is necessary for the Office of Alcoholism Budget revision because the total amount of amendments does not exceed 15% of the Budget allocated by the State. Current Alcoholism Revised Budget Revised Contract Program Budget- 77-78 Budget 77-78 Difference 24-743- 1 East Co. Detox $ 118 ,667 $ 124,817 $ 6150 24-738-8 ?National Council 30 ,436 30 ,636 200 on Alcoholism 24-722- 10 Bi -Bett Inc. 454 , 174 479 ,628 25,808 (24-749-8 Center for Human 46,388 47, 748 1 ,360 Develooment Total Credited $33 , 598 The above monies can be identified as follows in the attached Alcohol ism. Program Budget dated 1 DEC 77 which has been approved by the Board of Supervisors . Central County Detox - Page 5B - Item C - delete El 12. Start up costs for the SB 38 program for :which 90/10 _ E13 ,005] conies -were used . These funds must be replacedby the County start up nonies , $66 ,000 (Page 6B - 78) . These start up funds were approved by the Board of Supervisors on 23 JAN 78 and must be replaced as tha Program progresses - 172 , 675 Net East County budget minus the total [9,151 cc,--:-- i tt::d net of $ 169 , 524 (See 0000 attached Contracts cc : _ r , or: t,ac+�Ir�,in TOTAL D.b, I 'i X3 . 55 • • •. _.!! . •tet=!. .•) .._... -,.... �.......•:.Y :. . :.... `E`�.1 ,t..�� :. ••;'��a.:=:`-- 47. 21, I°f O:. COUNTY MMOT3O1,tS`•1 ADKEIRIS 1? TORS SUBJECT: r Lki-iZ i' 1977-78 ti 1 1977-7i.000�OLZs�•± LLOv.1 1 j_ lit�tached is the Fiscal Year 1977-78 final alcoholism.' `allocation fo� }Ctir cou:tty. Tne format provides- dat 2i1ed . .da ta.: for .S to t e ancL . Federal alcoholi s-m funds ad�ris•tered try tze .Office of Alcoholism. Tbac fi.nnal allocation includes a. 67. costt of livi_nC increase to .�.. 7 f T C 'lv ��j1•+ . . " r S is t._%Ooun Ey Genual Funds including :t• :1..�...er�_2i:io,. .. UM, Of 1970-77, Foca tia:i21 Rehabilitation State uosp-i-a l Frog aau s, 'a-ad Hun-has Federal Formula Grant. Funds_ FY 1977-78 Fundiro- CaLeo=ies •StatelCou, t (Gs-neral Ftnds.) _ State/County (Ganeral Funds) (90/10) received a 6% cost of livl.no increase over t- FY 1976-77 base allocation. .were: is uo chza:oa from. the preli-ti�?ary allocation. ALS-; antaLt_;o:i - hc $65,000,000 auo entation. funds _oY Fiscal Year 1976=7 7 will continue in FLsczl Year 1977-78 with a 6% cost of li:vina kn xease. ad -a_l. As t'i th other state .aen.eral. f ::ds> t7 esa aug— 2Z La runds require a 10% county -:atch. Ce:sties will be required to shif t the s tate s ure oZ- � ei*i-Cal fiLE as . t0 iii:a?�?Cv C�/!0 State/Co/lntt/ funded coal unity bas-ed" p. Cir? ?, _ CoT=r!- ::ill be rcGalira�':.d to provide 8. 10' cost^`y �-f 4.CI fat as 311 ' �2::=-CA j. ;f iiaLii 3d LOCv 90/10 orogrrans. lfic:re .7.s no ?ange froze: `;., •'`-.�._ . y allocation. 00• .. .. _. . .. ,, ,_. .....••:•!�.'� ._ . '"'_''n'R�7.Tw�"`�r'31�'.,+'!n!S?tl�M!!'�h w.,rsw.u...,yre cenaral Funds 9 _ ,. ugmentation Funds (1 76-77) 172 , 339 i•:4di-Cal (To he shifted to State General Fuad) 'Vocation-al Rehabilitation 17 State Hospital _ Camnari llo 2•fatr000lita:i (Tcha shi'ted to State Ge-neral Fund) -0- Total State Funds $1,253, G9S FE:'DF?.1. 'FUNDIS Fede_al Fors tuia Grant (Hughes) $56.476 Suppietmen to l Security Inco-me (SST) Ad.-Li nistrators Quarter-I.- Mtteei inn (�i'_�izas) 2 Total Federal Funds _ $5729L5 009 • ;tL�.urIUE.. (-lillul�,vll ntllrizC.l . .._ . ALLOCATION; BUDGET; 6 FUNDING SOURCE COMPARISON CjRIC�I.ifAL AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 1'9 77 / •78 CCT CADGE T Srl►;iiI SS ION DATED : i��y�3,a,197.f3 COUNTy CONTRA COSTA `[RE:AI EiiU�tai�� y_iI..t,T.AJ-I_Qtl TOTAL 01 _ A?11Ill. PRI:VE?ITIOil IDEi iF, RES IDENT I 1NO�IRES TOT?iL � . 0 .3UDGZTL-D 76,983 107,885 139,190 934,459 629,001 1,060,096 10 Ft°,1OI11G SutjR,.^Es M:,"i Cal , 71 71 11cn--rccicriL - Fcdcr;•`l 424 56,476 56,900 72 f 1, 77. 73 SSI 73 St'atc sharc 1 n9r"1 68,'904 97 097 115,451 627,926 373,679 1,283,057 74 h Cos,ntyty Sparc 7J q7,655 10,788 12,827 69,773 41,518 142,561 75 Comity Funds 76 oo.s,cr 75 =es ------ ------ 184,286 87,764 272,050 771r,surarzcc�_ 77 ti 78 O;.I,q 10,912 52,434 142,182 205,528 78 (!•,c,T, 1 ncs 70 - 80 t6ru 73) F,u TUAl S _ 76,983 107,885 139,190 934 ,459 615,414 1,9GO,096 Rcv.�?19176 ALLOCA T 1 O?I BUDGCT COMPAR I SCiI: Allocation do ted 90_3�10 1,265,958 1,265,958 9q CC STATE 9i_ticcliCn1 -. 91 SHARE 92,...._Voc,__RS:.bc7_b,_ 17_,141 17,141 92 93__5 tea tc..110 i?., _.__._..- - ------ 93 91f.._..STATC.. S11AK.TWIL... 1.283.099,..__. w1 ,283�099 91f 95.__.f �� ._.f�t'nlu_l1 ,__G r_t2mt 5b,9 0 56,900 9S 96 1 ALCOHOL PROGRAM BUDGET. PAGE 2 ' ADIIINISTRAT7ON ,FISCAL YEAR 19 77 / 78 ORI Gl VAL AMENDED O C S , , BUDGET SUBMISSION DATED`41av 23 1978 COUNTY � CONTRA COSTA f,0:11 t!! ST1'j%T t QN, _ PITGrT A n C h C E: r, Provldcrwr� Medical Center for Ol Wmia Services Human ADMIN, Ol (Alcohol ) Development NCA TOTALS Administrati n 05 PI'Ovider Ownber 0700000 0701100 0702100 Oa Total C0 Bud Oc Md 47,306 19,677 10,000 76,983 60 Ful�t�!t� snuR_rrS. Fcd. Forrcala 424 ------ ------ 424 72 _ .C,a arts 72 State'Sh�arcc 42 194 17,71.0 9,000 68,904 t 71f 9fQ-rZ_ 70 County Sha rc 75 00.,? , -_____,_. 4,688 1,967 11000 7,655 75 County Funds 76 11.i,hca: 76 78 Othcr B 7 -n�i -I encs 72 - thru 78 47 ,306 C=� 19,677 10,000 76,983 Flo -..T-OT&L__— 80 Rcy. 2/'9176 PREVENTION FISCAL YEAR 1977 7g , 1 CUDGET S'UMISSION CATED 23, 1978 ORIGIVAL IAV TIDED IN JUE C Cil COUNTY CONTRA COSTA OCT. C _pUhGE. A p C D E F G s AIRS LICA Center for 01 - f;,vicler Harr: Human Dev. --'--" � TOTALS U5 hrovldcr t:ur.,tcr 0703110 0702110 0701110 21 SttJd^_nt 23,000 4 ,055 28,071 55,136 21 22 ruhllc 51,704 1,105 ------ 58,809 22 3 .60 TOTAL BUDGETED} 74,704 5,110 28,071 107,88560 GC FUNDING SOURCES Federal Formula 72 Grantz 7z 711 _�kGt� _( ,' 67,234 4,579 25,264 97,097 74 75County 107, 7,470 511 2,807 10,798 75 761—�Qtjr.Lty_E.trnd r, 76 Fac:s and 77 ._._. Insurance 77 78 Other 78 I 803 TOTALS 74,704 5,110 28,071 107,885 80 OA-183 (3/77) ALCQ1 SOL PROGRAi l BUDGEt' IDENTIFICATION ORI GI NAL AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 19�/� OCT, t�r-1 COUM T Y COIN'MA COSTA BUDGET SUBI l SS I O;I DATED t.a.y 23,. 1978 D F r G AIRS NCA O$ _Ct.o��.i_r;c.r.�►a.r,„^ .TOTALS 30 ..�rn;clM'�s�_lluallxcr 0703120 0702120 82,679 24,244 106,923 Presc;l,cttr:� 37 __"_Invac,,, i.g-.tton_ 32. 2,194 2,194 33 _r�wl � _ 33 31' 30,073 30,073 34 35 35 CO TOTAL BUDGETED 112,752 26,438 139,190 co I`cdcral F'ora;ula 72 7Z 73 ss3, _ 73 7t! _J�tz l p _�0Ao/ 115,451 101,477 , 74 County (10%) 11,275 1,552 12,827 75 75 {�c�.l_x_____ — County Funds 76 _Q.thcr 76 F'ccs and O 77 77 78 0Hinr 10,912 "-n 10, 192 78 I'0 VITA! F1RI !I iIG _ . 112,752 � __.__26,438 __ _ _. ___ ._ ___._ _ _ 139,190+______. 80 � ►��.v.��:L F liIJUIV-10.1 DW)UL I PAGE RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION FISCAL YEAR 19* 77 /' 78 ORIGINAL AM0.1DED JUNEhn -OCT. L'���1 C.1 ©a- � coUtlTY coN-EgA C0S_I:l BUDGET SUPIMI SS I Obi CA T ED "ay 23,,.3,1978 DU1),ET A D C D E F G Sunrise Diablo Fauerso East County Ozanam East County RESIDENTIAL P r°�'i de r . Nouse' Valley Recovery Recovery Center Recovery , TREArT NEUT E 01 Ranch _ RCfIAL' I L(TAT(•0.� , 11rovid c r 05 0704132 0705132 0706132 0707132 0705132 0708132 TOTALS * 41 DcLoxification ON Dudnct ttl Tics. Trcatmcnt 42 117. 4 I:c iq tiomc 840 331,907 82,680 9,705 87,053 22,530 NEXT t 3 ,i< 17.0, t3. 63 Days 8,030 18,980 6,205 2,648 5,475 1,440 63 64 C7;r, Pcr A2y ll 15.05 17.49 13.33 14.97 15.90 15.64 PAGE 6�1 FUNDIPG SOURCES 7 l��_di -C�z1 . 0 _ Fednr,l 70 71 11cd i -Ca l 71 72 Fed l'ormu 1 a _P I-a n t 72 SUnLe Slit)re �� 61 872 177,146 52,959 7,294 56,447 17,478 74 7 Conn tY Share f 0'i,) 7,208 1 J9,683 5 894 . . 811 L271 1,942 75 ?S CounLy Funds � G - 7 7 Fors 48,760 82,644 23,837 1,600 24,335 3,110 '' 1 h��i -,In 77 3 ULhcr 52,434 78 (�Idd 1 in-,a 70 120,840 331,907 82,630 9,705 87,053 22,530 RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND REHABILZTATTON . FTSCA1. YEAR 1*.9 7/' 7p '1 Of;i GNAL. AMENDED GC-OCT, DIM COUNTYCd t0UbG►'I* SUMU SS 1011 DATED `ti 11110CET A D C D E f' G ' - RESIDf:fJ1'il�l. - f'rovidct• Ho11or,on East County East County ESIDENTI r:. Dptox Detox Detox O} flr.'�c t;LIUIDii,f1'.�lTlni: 1't n�I c1^r y 0708152 0706142 0707152 05 r _lL.!"I��.t 70TALS DeLux 1 fici,Liot, }I 279 ,75 501 1 Pt,cl�Ir. L _ 171,720 32,523 ,744 Iles, Tr,,!,iL-cnL rig Rccovrry !!o:::c 113 _...P!,! '�Cl,— ._»_ 6b4 ,715 }l r 3 63 O'ly:; 7,300 3,960 2,160 51 ,138 611 Cost her nay 23.52 33.59 34.95 rpt ................-y N.rti__....tn•v ...r�wl..�,rss••.I•w•..v1rw! ...r.rv*wn.�,�.•...r•s,walw .�..._. ..+..._+v....+w.. ....f.�.w...www►.w ..—w.....+..+...... —_.........wV..»n..f-+.—........... 11U11DNIG SOURCES C cl .t 70 _ Fr.rlr.r�1 Ii1 71 .'? Fed 1'011:.:;Ila —_ 1 tr 5C�itr: Share 7 627 ,966 154;548 29,271 67,951 {tll' Sharc;.;�._ _ 17,172 3,252 7,55069,773 711, 7(l :r)tmt:y Funds ins it ~nrr. 184 ,2>3G 1'I 73 _0L1',cr 52,434 ..._._. c1 (A(Id I I nes 70� 171,720 32,523 75;501 934,459 . . .. ..._........ ..._._•___.._.1:r:..-...........�......7..L'?7:'.^.,:;..CRZ.tLr.......::r '•'::C:::r.^.__.. ... ._..::�:at---r:.....,..._....._.._.........._:::...... ..:......,.....__.......:....-..—....�.. ....._:....._,. .. .. ALCOHOL PROGRAM BUDGET PAGE r HMESIDENTIAL TREATIAMT AND REHABILITATION FISCAL YEAR 191;, 8 , ORI N UAI_ A11E11DED (; 21t!`IE ocT. C. _"l COWI T Y CONTRA COSTA BUDGET SUBMISSION DATED • miav 23. 978 #ltJCC,F ( A D C D E F G 1 East Country North Vocational East County 1IOURESIDr-HT. 1•orlLct• AIRS AIRS Drop-In Richmond Rehabilitati n Drop-In TF,CAit1rWT tt Drop-In RE[L'161LITAT1011 05 11:x,=;fr:r 0703140 0703141 0707142 0706142 0709142 0703142 TO'iALS ' 51 73,734 51 . 52 G1s1 170,416 52 Otl1 :r r 53 10,229 28,071 95,228 23,746 - 53 € 1 od. , Grp. Other 5,000 33,600 2,1325 1 ,500 FIA 1,675 G1 `tr/Fa.il-I.JQI-Vi.1 t 62 CostiPipr'/Fir G2 Vr s, 1: 14.95 5,07 12.39 18.71 FIA 14.17 ..... I 1 1:..,_1_. ...�..,�-�...........,.....�..��... .�.. �.,.�.._ .._.._. F1.1110 i NG SOURCES 7n lied -CaI _ !dv ra 1 70 71 1:tdi -C�t i1r.�t FC.t1nt'G 1 7,1 Fc;l. lo1'iat'la i 7r f",r•,in1: 7 State S411011- 71, (907) h01'^7J' '!.) _._5` 3I�..._..... RQc� -___g•, ____ 25 264 17 141 21 372 74 75 CounlLy Sham 5948 13,567 1,022 2,807 1,905 2,374 75 Cour,tyµFunds 7 5 _�t7 1 1, r• 76 1 ccs . 77 llist,r,snc^_ 15,250 34,750 ------ ------ ------ 77 7E, O'th:.r 76,182 %8 AddI I tic::; 70 _ _�. tltrtr */8 73,7341 170,416 10,229 28,071 95,228 23,746 60 OTA1. c� ALCOHOL PROGRAM BUDGET PAGE 6b C M9URESIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION �i o11GI �in,L �!ISrrIDC:J FISCAL YEAR 19 77 78 OCT. ,: rG=' C� COu11TY CONTRA COSTA BUDGET DATED . n�a, �s 1977 - Pro":i(,c'r iii-Qett Bi-Qett Sunrise AIRS East County NOPRESIDENT. Drop-In 'Job Develop Family & PCP Drop-In TREATMENT s Al omni (Spanish S pkgl ILITAT ION' 0705142 0705143 0704142 0703142 0708142 10TALS 1 rd i'vi c':a - 1 74,734 51 2 Group 170,416 52 3 C .rkirt: 152,135 15,946 21,200 105,764 6,150 4b6+4.51 - 53. • Irci, , %t'n. OZl�cr i t;,. r,r•rrr- , -�,; 5,475 NA MA Ending Caselo d 48,402'197 Gl Cost Fr�r/Hr � . Vi i I: 27.79 NA NA 02 M1111.11IG SOURCES Ifccii -Cal 70 cIc,ra1 ------ �Fcd. Fnr,.:.,1a 71 r, ,,-, , 56,476 ------ ~ 56,4.76 72 S ti�:c S,-,arc 86 094 14 351 19 080 ------ 5 535 _ ,..{..►�'X1 _ _ � � � � 373,679 4 Court C� 5;;a r c -� 1 595 2 120 41,518 7 9,565 � ------ 61575 COUri ty FLMe.S '- � (J 37,764 87,764 t i,c:t Start-up loss I 6600 142,182 %n r1(Id I l :Irr,r 18 1521135 15,946 21,200 6,150 103,764 6� 9,001 F.e 1977-78 ALCOHOLISM COi IML J5 North Richmond Ncighbor- I:ast Los Center Vocational Hood county Iledanos for ilumait Rehab Ilrnrsr. iitnrise_ Nov-')-lrr. Jul,-Oct FICA AIRS Devrlo ,nient; (Al cohol �� ' 1229,135 $220,370 $ 62,800 $ 118 ,140 $44,070 $25,000 $365,618 $165,690 $44 ,660 7 ,000 900 6,707 6,266 3,133 1 )798 12,000 4,900 10,1312 94,769 15,304 20,121 1 ,280 640 5,558 12,000 22,948(1 ) 11 ,427(2) 114,438 38,710 26,828 ).0,816 10,405 4,905 43,600 , 15,240 » 41 ,839 2,701 7 ,665 1 ,692 846 3,106 - 300 - 106,943 32,408 34,494 3,583 1 ,792 981 13,000 5,100 281329(3) 5911 ,174 310,393 158,615 121 ,777 60,806;v,lr-/ 41 ,348 446,218 214,178 95,?.28 140,000 302000 48,760 3,110 1 ,600 - 50,000 52,948(4) 76,182 r,�i�1e net 454,174 280,393 109,855 1182667 ..b9,28G•%�%'� 411348 396,218 161 ,230 19,046 52,434 20,759 15,575 - .13029' 10,911 15,000 » 01 ,740 258,634 93,280 118 ,667 • 50,857 30,436 381 ,218 161 ,230 19;046 Administra- DVR� Fauerso Recover! R(..qqvery Recovery, tion (VIP) Prevention Prevention Reimb' 169,641 ,843 X080 -24-1000 16,28 10,000 7 704 20,071 16 182000 4,000 63700 13000 500 7,000 52000 1,100 ?? Family & Identifi- Administration Ozanam Hollomon Alumni Vetox Detox Prevention cation Trainin 55,271 171 TTZ-0 21.200 -` 78,222 3,523 52110- 126,357 38)317 5,000 5,800 11000 11650 850 4,000 12,000 700 Identifi- Individual Substance Drop-in Drop-in D^ ,in Drop-in cation O aticnt Abuse '77-0,922 ^28 07�" }, r 1 G 1� 5 /,448 _ 1513' 26 54�i'�' 114s84 7,500 2,000 11800 900 3,500 4,150 41700 Building Group VocRehab Use -0-� Dill IOut atient 15,15 until - 125)242 4 300 6-30.79 800 13,85Gol0 Bud oted Mount OQ ?178,675 Reserve J. Ptava J. Hava J. Nava J. FlavaJ. Flava J. Flava J. Playa J. McCoy J .' Plava (.3) CJS( Sm"i1c^.S I Ci l ICIN, ! �/ •i 'r �r- Lj ;u �= :-'a:; CaZ.SI�?:l�'-ra_t TO USS, r.��sa ,�r��-a:€ r-�:; 5 =O.t �_ S '.T 7^ .(. ?r i4RQ7-T,i er-,'n IN {.'_fit"- 7 "r'.'.Q'J J �•� At JL,--.-;s ti...ie, Fist CouL_;.y :_•=t.ox CrnL e_ has been p=a-viL7nJ Saazii sn-.,peaking services, as best we could, for over tri-- years. We hive one AA meeting a .;eek in wSpan-iGh. Siith app_o-i r'3�eIY 20 rem lcr me- hers. One member of this.group is Oa oLur of Di recto=s. have another grout) of about 30 DacDi a Rho are refer red by Pr bation --ad who do not yet realize their problea is They are Droviied t? liLJ_erature. tap-as, films an! spea-kers. Discussions are held each meeting. _ Por both groups and cembers of their families, info_=ai.'_oa and r_-fer=al is available. Personal help outsiae the group setting also tykes place. This July the second a'1u31 Fiesta put on by the Spazi sh kA. grout) will to-ke pl3c- in Brent:iood. .Last Year it Stas a Jr ati. success ::ith abolat 150 peoDie attQn::irg. It attracted Spanish _AA r.. De_s and their -families from as far away as St--cyton. amd Sacramento. We need s dill ti=e staff member to -eep all this going and to make it avail able to --ore people. The staff member who has wept this all going has been doing- most o it in her spsre -ti=:e and also wor=e two 24-hour shif'cs in tee detax aad recovery program. it has been her hope that some Gay she. could -out her f'Vll atte^tion o^_ this Dra4ect. coa-Laitmaeu and Lalent and howled-e are su`i'� that it- wou d be a :Taste nat to follow throi:Za. 'I'IIe lan Euage barrier and cultural di_-:ereaces G?ie it', c==ost impossible for people to came to us for help ou" ei,: owe_ iFe est tat- the help and services to then_ 008 79 500 Rotor cg, CdJ-fbI,r:-j 94565/4 15 75,=1000 FE R `.. C,,-,LL--',y��.._. r:Z r.�:JV C� .L-.J to providi- .�_zus - l..�..QL� T:....�!--:� .:..r S�_ v1C�:, La vht. co nro:ic:a oaeSpan=sh-Sp�4_-wn; stet' ,web== ars ,.0 repi3'i`: c Suaf-I-m mb:_ in LD.''*uo.. -. R'_cove—, to fill Ti3Can=j 2. to provide a place Vaere $gin=SL-vp.'-3. people ieel -fl-ea ansafe t0 discuss their alcohol probl a as in t.^- it Q langu:arre. j. to provide Films, literature, *,:eekl .-LL group, Wee-k!Y trob3tioC-re-F'e_red group, spe3:__rs (,ham avai.16ble) r. and referral to other agencies - In. Sa3rish. L:. D-op-i- will be aper' j days a week - F3 hours a day with a 24-how c=i si s phone. . 5. to provide a supportive enviromamenLt for Spa sh- Spea'�img. alcoholics a=-2 their ='amilies so that t=ey have 'Che of a di� e�ent lie-style. o. to or ovide.a haven ;;here alcoha?ids ray sperm gree time as as alternative to the streets an? ba=s. 7. ,.o inrolTte volunteers and Deen a :•Qo us- ,.3? QroJ-ice in Ce cisio^-^a=xing to maintain a Beed"-l-rrou.7. 00880 O School Siree' Pittsburg Ca?ibmia 94565/4T5-754-4000. CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) Number 24 - 722 - 1. 1 1. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 24-722-10 Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Alcoholism services novation contract Effective -Date of Contract: July 1, 1977 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: BiBett, Inc. Capacity: Nonprofit California corporation Address: 1260-A Monument Boulevard, Concord, California 94520 (Mail: P.O. Box 5487, Concord, California 94524) 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is July'l 1977 4. Amendment Specifications. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the "Amendment Specifications" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Legal -Authority. This Contract Amendment Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 19900 et seq. 6_ Signatures. These signa-,L,.^es attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OF 0 1 STA, CALIFCRNIA CONTRACT By is R. L Schroder By airman, Board of Supervisors Designate official capacity in bL3insss-;-. Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation se-a3.). State of California ) By County of Contra Costa ) iamie Deputy ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recommended by Human Re-ources Agency known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that be/ By e they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a res ution of its board of directors. Foran Approved: County Counsel Dated: 70 FORM APPROVVD By to ContractAdm,,'niwat* Deputy 9496= ot I,i>esipee� `� u is/D puty County Clerk 00881 Microfilmed: with board order AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS Number 2 4 2- 2- Contractor Contractor and County agree to amend the contract identified herein in order to increase the Payment Limit as specified in Paragraph 5 of the Contract Special Conditions and amend the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures contained in the Service Plan commensurate to the Payment Limit increase. In addition, Contractor and County agree to amend the contract in order to clarify certain provisions of the Service Plan. The contract is amended as specified below while all other parts of the contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Payment Limit Increase Paragraph 4., Payment Limit, is changed to read: "County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $479,628." Service Plan Modification Paragraph 6.c., Job Development Services, is changed to read: "The Contractor will employ one full-time staff person to direct an employment program for Contractor's recovery home clients. This program will consist of the following: (1) Assistance regarding job readiness. (2) Assistance and training regarding employee responsibilities. (3) Assisting residents in obtaining opportunities (i.e., janitorial service) for actual "On-the-Job" training (OJT). (4) Other help or training as appropriate to assist residents with employment planning." Paragraph 7., Service Units, is changed to read: "a. Recovery Home Service Units of Service. Ozanum: 4,600 Diablo Valley Ranch: 18,000 A unit of service, for reporting purposes, shall be defined as the provision of Recovery Home Service for one client in one residentialday; i.e., any portion of a single 24-hour period ending at 12:00 midnight during which a client receives care and/or treatment within a residential setting provided by Contractor. b. Job Development Services 1,900 Units of Service A unit of service, for reporting purposes, shall be defined as the provision of Job Development Services for one staff hour for one or more clients. c. Alcoholism Drop-in Center Services . 7,500 Units of Service A unit of service, for reporting purposes, shall be defined as the provision of Alcoholism Center Services for one client up to 23 consecutive hours during which a client receives services within Contractor's facility or a telephone or personal contact provided on behalf of an Alcoholism Center client. Budget Modification The Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures contained in the Service Plan is modified by substitution of the attached Budget. Initials: Contractor Co4fity Dept. 00882 . _.. lii.wa r1..r���.Ir11Y r.���l/II�u/w�1W111ri1YiY1.ir1�IW_'_n�r. ... .. s _vim":.�__ •: •. •,. '- . BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES r- Number 24 i 2 2 1<1 Estimated 12-Month Amount A. Operational Budget. Cost Categories 1. Staff Salaries $ 232,345 2. Operational Expenses 10,999 3. Administration 119,332 �. . Facility Costs 113,508 5. Equipment and Supplies 31,593 6. Program Support 79,264 Gross Allowable Program Cost $ 587,041 Applicable Outside Revenue* ( 158,979) Net Allowable Program Costs $ 428,062 Donations* ($ 434) Approved Alcohol Funds $ 427,628 County Revenue Sharing Grant 52,000 NET ALLOWABLE CONTRACT COSTS - CONTRACT PAYMENT LIMIT $ 479,628 *Yoni_s to be collected and applied to the Gross Allowable Program Cost by Conz actor during the 12-month program period. Applicable Outside Revenues Computed as follows: (1) Client Fees $ 106,979 (2) County Revenue Sharing Grant 52,000 $ 158,979 Estimated B. :.et Program Budget. (County reimbursement) Program Amounts 1. Recovery Rome - Ozanum Center $ 62,718 - Diablo Valley Ranch 196,829 2. Job Development 15,946 3. Alcoholism Drop-In Service Center 152,135 ' County Revenue Sharing Grant* 52,000 ' TOTAL (Contract Payment Limit) $ 479,628 *Subject to expenditure for County-approved allowable Recovery Rome Service costs. C. Changes in Program Payment Limits. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, and in accordance with State guidelines, each line item program budget amount specified in Paragraph B, Net Program Budget, may be changed, but only if the change does not exceed 15Z of the combined alcoholism Programs Payment Limit, or $20,000, whichever is less, and only with prior written authorization from the County's Alcoholism Program Chief. Initials: Contractor unty Dept. 0883 CONTRACT AMENDMENT AGREE14ENT (Contra Costa County Human Resources Agency) 24 - x' 43 - Number i. Identification of Contract to be Amended. Number: 24-743-1 Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Alcoholism services novation contract Effective -Date of Contract: November 1, 1977 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: EAST COUNTY COMMUNITY DETOXICATION CENTER Capacity: Nonprofit California corporation Address: 500 School Street, Pittsburg, California 94565 3. Amendment Date. The effective date of this Contract Amendment Agreement is May 1, 1978 4. Amendment Specifications. The Contract identified above is hereby amended as set forth in the "Amendment Specifications" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference. 5. Leel Authority. This Contract Amendment Agreement is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Welfare and Institutions Code, Sections 5170 - 5176; Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 19900 et seq. 6. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUN—1 y OF Q&COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR BY coder B , Chairman, Board of Supervisors - 'N esignate official acity in business Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) � / State of California ) By acl('L/y�lf.� l75 .�J�LQ.D—lL County of Contra Costa ) Jamie L. Johnson Deputy ACKN04TLEDG14ENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor Recar-nended by Human ources Agency known to me in those individual and �7 business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By Cif /tLl� they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. Fora z»roved: County Counsel Dated: 7 ? F7R,Xi APPROVED BY NRA Deputy ByDesinee /Deputy County Clerk QQ�� ELIZABETH P- HUTCHIIIS Q PU7y COUi TY CLE-0!� Microfilmed with board order Centra Co,tc County, Co1iforn AMENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS 24 - 74t3 • Number - 2 In consideration of Contractor's agreement to provide Drop-In Services for the Spanish speaking in East County under the Contract identified by number above, County agrees to increase the Contract Payment Limit. Contractor and County therefore agree to amend said Contract as specified below, while all other parts of said Contract remain unchanged and in full force and effect: 1. Payment Limit Increase. The Payment Limit specified in Paragraph 4. (Payment Limit) is hereby increased by an additional $6,150 to a new total Payment Limit of $124,817. 2. Additional Service. The Service Plan is modified by the following additions: Paragraph 6. Service, add: d. Drop-In Services for Spanish Speaking. Contractor will establish a facility in the Oakley-Brentwood area suitable for provision of "drop-in" services. The purpose of this facility, or Drop In Center, will be to provide information and referral and drop-in services related to the problems of alcoholism and the establish- ment of alternative life styles. Services will be provided to the Spanish-speaking community in Eastern Contra Costa County. Contractor's service program will include the following components: (1) One Spanish speaking staff member will be employed at Drop-In Center. (2) Drop-In Center will be open five (5) days per week, eight (8) hours per day, County holidays excepted. (3) Crisis telephone number will be available 24 hours per day: (4) Drop-In Center activities will include scheduling of Spanish language films, literature, weekly Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) group, weekly Probation Department referred group, speakers, information and referral, community outreach, and informal activities. (5) Drop-In Center will include use of volunteers and resource persons as appropriate and available to assist with provision of service. Paragraph 7., Service Units, add: d. Drop-In Services for Spanish Speaking 100 Units of Service A unit of service, for reporting purposes, shall be defined as the provision of one telephone or person-to-person contact related to one or more Spanish-speaking alcoholic clients and/or their family members. 3. Special Conditions Modification. Special Conditions are modified as specified herein: a. Paragraph 2, Cost Report and Settlement, is modified to change the Payment Limit to the new increased Payment Limit as follows: .11 2. Cost Report and Settlement. Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) of the Payment Provisions is hereby modified in its entirety to read as follows: "No later than August 31, 1978, or 60 days following the termination of this Contract, whichever comes first, Contractor shall submit to County a fiscal year cost report in the form required by County, showing the total gross allowable program costs which have actually been incurred by Contractor, and the total non-County program revenues (excluding donations) which have actually been provided by Contractor, during the 12-month fiscal year period from July 1, 1977 through June 30, 1978, in accordance with the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures set forth in the Service Plan. If said cost report shows that the net allowable contract costs (as defined below) which have actually been incurred by Contractor during said fiscal year period exceed the payments made by County for said period pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but not to exceed the 8-month Payment Limit of $124,817 for said fiscal year period. Initials: Contractor County Dept. -1- ARENDMENT SPECIFICATIONS �A# 4 Number _ 7 3 — 2 If said cost report/ shows that the payments made by County for said fiscal year period pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed said net allowable contract costs which have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract during said period, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. The net allowable contract costs for cost report and settlement purposes is defined as the . total gross allowable program costs which have actually been incurred by Contractor hereunder during said fiscal year period, minus the total non-County program revenues (excluding donations) which have actually been provided by Contractor during said fiscal year period ending June 30, 1978." b. Paragraph 4., Automatic Contract Extension, is modified to change the six-month Payment Limit to an increased amount as follows: "a. The Contract Payment Limit, specified in Paragraph 4., (Payment Limit) of this Contract, is increased by $93,601 (the 6-month Payment Limit) and County's total payments to Contractor for said six-month extension period shall not exceed this six-month Payment Limit. "b. The Project description, set forth in Paragraph 8. (Project) of this Contract, is modified to read as follows: Contra Costa County Alcoholism Plan and Program Budget for FY 1978-79 and any modifications or revisions thereof. "c. Contractor shall continue to provide services as set forth in the Service Plan, subject to any amendments thereto; all service units and line item budget amounts (set forth in the Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures) shall be prorated for a six-month period. "d. In addition to the fiscal-year cost report specified above in Paragraph 2. (Cost Report and Settlement) of these Special Conditions, no later than February 28, 1979, or as otherwise may be prescribed by County, Contractor shall also submit to County an extension period cost report, as specified in Paragraph 2. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, covering the period of this six-month contract extension from July 1, 1978 through December 31, 1978, and County and Contractor shall follow the cost report and settlement procedures specified in Paragraph 2. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, subject to the six-month Payment Limit of $93,601 for said extension period. "e. Said six-month contract extension shall be subject to any further agreement (novation) which Contractor and County may enter into covering the provision of services during FY 1978-79, in accordance with the Contra Costa County Alcoholism Plan and Program Budget for FY 1978-79." 4. Budget Modifications. The Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures contained in the Service Plan is modified by substitution of the attached budget. Initials: ontrac or County Dept. 00886 —2— E r i BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES Number,, 4 — ` 4 3 — 2 Estimated 8-Month Amounts A. Operational Budget. Cost Categories 1. Personnel $ 88,140 2. Operational Cost 6,266 3. Administrative Costs 1,280 4. Facility Costs 20,816 5. Equipment & Supplies 1,692 6. Program Support 3,583 7. Drop-In Services for Spanish Speaking 6,150 (Start-up costs) Gross Allowable Program Cost $ 127,927 Applicable Outside Revenue* ($ 3,110) Net Allowable Program Cost $ 124,817 Donations* ($ -0-) NET ALLOWABLE CONTRACT COSTS - CONTRACT PAYMENT LIMIT $ 124,817 *,Monies to be collected and applied to the Gross Allowable Program Cost by Contractor during the 12-month program period. Estimated Program Amounts B. Net Program Budget. (County Reimbursement) 1. 72-Hour and Social Setting Detoxification Services $ 78,222 2. Recovery Home Services 24,000 3. Drop-in Service 16,445 4. Drop-in Servicesfor Spanish Speaking 6,150 (Start-up costs) TOTAL '(Contract Payment Limit) $ 124,817 C. Changes in Program Payment Limits Subject to the Payment Limit of this contract, and in accordance with State guidelines, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed, but only if the change does not exceed 15% of the total budget for State and Federal funds, or $20,000, whichever is less, and only with prior written authorization from the County's Alcoholism Program Chief. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00887 d In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 14 78 In the Matter of REIMBURSEMENT FOR DAMAGED PERSONAL PROPERTY ROGER DALE CLUCK, DEPUTY SHERIFF Good cause appearing, therefore, it is by this Board ordered that the County Auditor-Controller issue a warrant in the amount of Twenty-Nine Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($29.75) as reimbursement to Deputy Sheriff Roger Dale Cluck for repairs to a wristwatch damaged in an altercation with a prisoner at County Jail on September 8, 1977. PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27, 1978. J 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors Deputy Roger Cluck affixed this 27tray of June 19 78 Civil Service - Safety Div. County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk / d Bye ./��,(� � . Deputy Cleric Jamie L. Johnson H -24 3/716) 15m - DEMAND on the Treasury or the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Jan. 23, 1978 r STATE OF CALIFORN16 _ Date Made by ROGER D. CLUCK Address 847 BROOKSIDE DR. ., RICHMOND, CAL1F. 948 L'H +5 3 29 F'H '78 For the sum of TI4ENTY NINE & 75/100--------------=:L:,n- � �1<bE :LAZSS 29.75 REPAIR OF MATCH Being for -- ----- - --- - .—-------------- - --- - __as itemized below: WPORTANT—See Instructions on Reverse Side SPECIAL .DATE DESCRIPTION CODE AMOUNT 1-23-78 REPAIR OF A LA JAY WATCH JAI u i The undersigned under the penalty of perjury states: That the above claim and the items as therein set out are true and correct: that no part thereof has been heretofore paid, and that the amount therein is just e d that ee sam 's esented within one year after the last item thereof has accrued. C/ �G Si Received, Accepted, and Expenditure Authorized Y parrment he or Ch' f Deputy r Auditor's Invoice Approvet! for: Vendor Number Price- No. Terms Comnutation Card Description Expotmditure Account I Net Code Regular Discount 4P e 4i I Fund Bud et Unic-Obieet Sub-Acer- C R -; Amount i . I • i i c i .n i,; iter 11 Microiilmed with board order :_ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 ..Zg In the Matter of Authorization for Contract Negotiations The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director,. Human Resources Agency, regarding a certain request from .the County Manpower Office for the completion of a contract for the provision of various types of program-related services for the County, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee, is AUTHORIZED to conduct contract negotiations with the prospective contractor named below for completion of a purchase of service contract for the anticipated terms and effective dates - and not to exceed .the estimated contract amount (payment limit)- as follows: CONTRACTS ANTICIPATED MAXIMUM PROSPECTIVE COUNTY PROGRAM TERM/ EST. AMT. CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT SERVICES EFF. DATE (FUNDING) 1; Western institute of Medical 24-hr. care 7/1/78 - $2,390 or Human, Resources, Inc. Services/ for'mentally 8/31/78 $1,195/mo.* (Child care institution Mental ill child (2 months) (90% State, under Board Resolution 77/560) Health (under Short 10% County: Doyle OPT-OUT Short-Doyle) Program) *subject to change 2. James J. O'Donnell Health Occupational 7/1/78 - $19,700 A - (self-employed consultant) alcoholism 6/30/79 (900 State, consultation 10% County: services Alcoholism Budget) 3. State Department of Health Health Dental Disease 7/1/78 - $11,000 Prevention -Prop. 6/30/79 (100% State (County operated) Subvention) 4. State Departu-iiert of Health Health V.D. Control 7/1/78- $10,8001 . Program 6/30/79 (100% State (County operated) Subvention) 5. Richmond Unified School Social WIN child' 7/1/78 - $21,660 District Service day care 6/30/79 (90% Federal, 6.75% State, 3.250 County: - Title IV-C) 6. YWCA of Contra Costa County Social WIN child 7/1/78 - $20,000 Service day care 6/30/79 (same as above 7. Pittsburg Unified School Social WIN child 7/1/78 - $8,500 District Service day care- 6/30/79 (same as above (page I of 2) . 00890 Authorization for Contract- Negotiations (cont'd) ANTICIPATED MAXIMUM PROSPECTIVE COUNTY PROGRAM TERM/ EST. AMT. CONTRACTOR DEPARTMENT SERVICES EFF. DATE (FUNDING) 8. Vienna- Ruark Social Foster Parent 7/1/78 - $20 , - Service Education and 12/31/78 (75% Federal Orientation 25% County) 9. Nola Ashford 10. Paula Phipps $50 (75% Federal 205"01 County) 11. Patricia Bacon 12. Bobbie Spiess It 13. Sarah Korte at 14. Linda Graves 15. Linda Hudson 16. Sara Sheets 17. Retirement Jobs, Inc Social Home chore 7/1/78 $35,132 Service referral services 6/30/79 Federal Older (Office on for senior citizens Americans Act Aging) Title III - 18. Mt. Diablo Rehabilitation Adult day health $29,256 Center carp (same as abo.- 19. Mt. Diablo Rehabilitation Nursing Home It $16,697 Center Ombudsman (same as abG.- 20. United Council of Spanish Richmond Senior $12,203 Speaking Organizations, Inc. transportation (same as .abo_ 21. Home Health & Counseling, inc. Pittsburg area $3,289 transportation (same as above CONTRACT AMENDMENT-, I. Permanente Medical Group Medical West County 7/1/78 Increased fee Services Emergency to $31 per Medical Services patient visit PASSED BY THE BOARD on June 27 , 1978. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full. true & correct copy of the original document which is on ilia in my office, Orig: Human Resources Agency and that It was passed & adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa county, California, on Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit the date shown. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSOLN. County cc: County Administrator Clerk& ex-orticlo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors County Auditor-Controller by Deputy Clerk. County Manpower Program a, ;10 n U�' 2 7 19*1706 Director gm In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 79 78 In the Matter of CETA Title I Annual Plan Modification #803 (County #29-803-13) The Board having considered. the recommendations of tfie Director, Human Resources Agency, and the County Manpower Program Director regarding approval of Modification #803 to the County's FY 77-78 CETA Title I Annual Plan (DOL Grant #06-8004-10), requesting $426,896 in additional federal grant funding from the U.S. Department of Labor for federal FY 77-78 (October 1, 1977, through September 30, 1978), representing unexpended carryover funds from the County's FY 76-77 CETA Title I grant, to increase the County's present FY 77-78 CETA Title I grant from $3,641,351 to a new total of $4,068,247; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said CETA Title I Annual Plan; Modification #803 (County #29-803-13) is hereby APPROVED for submission to the U.S. Department of Labor and that the Board Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute said Annual Plan Modification. PASSED BY THE 80;=3D on June 27, 1978. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attu: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 27thday of June 19 78 County Auditor-Controller County Manpower Program J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director U.S. Dept. of Labor By Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson 008Q2 H-244/7715m Date JUN 2 7 1978 29 - 803 - 13 Dear Arthur Douglas Grants cer ncics•ed for you= raview Zig- a_=Pr val __ (a e) +. Modification PSA - Certi f_CSi=o:1 == Sall t e=pec.. unahancec t c= previous sear ' Cer ti=icatior. •that PSA f i �e-� yam uoa Z ..+- .. ems- �11..a1 a..__C.+-.. r v 5..x+.5 An=al Plan(s) _ -or tle.(s) g IMoe_tica_ion request 8()3 to Az_:...'z t 06- n4_1n `o= title I - ?lease not==_v =a of Yom'= actor oa === enc-lose= as Soo:: as �cssihle_ Sincerely O=Z-iCIal G= ia►:3,;_ prime snonso: Robert I. Schroder.. . zzclosu=e Chairman, Board of Supervisors .. Contra Costa County.:. 00893 Microfilmed wit}t board.order •I' ' WA$Approfrt►M.2�.?021J/ FEDERAL AjS15TAj�C.e Z.APPLI• a•nul+aia z. .rArs S. !r,Mai.? GNr3 29-803-13 APPUCA. 75052412 1. TYPE PF-EA UCALTION APPLI- 0.II.1IE l 81 IDE"TT- 5-k^TE Yasr >•.o.+::. do, OF CATION19 '" `•" FTER A3'•t.k.� 19 77- 4 -- 25 AC':ION M APPUG(TJOli tkq.:e- 0 ,IvnFIc.1TIOH OF 1.4T'-:Nr (ert.) L... MOW OF FEDERAL ACTION Ettaw a 0. L=IAL AYPLICANT/RECIPIENT 5. FEDEP.AL EMPLOfER IDENTIFICATION NO. ,.Aaol.3at Hama CCcONT 4 OSTA COUfTv BOARD OF SIi-PERU v 94600-509W i n. OrVIV1=1 iaa Unit ounyanpower Otfce 651 Pine Street f1. r.L_aEa h 1• Q 63 2 G s.�.e/P.o. eat PRD- GRAM b TME d. Oil Martinez c-aty : Contra Costa (p19,» Comprehensive Employment I. S.ata CA t•zt?colt 94553 Fes) and Training Programs b• Qnlad Pwwa (xeiv%. Judv Ann Miller 0 7.TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPLIGNT`s PROTECT 3.:YPE OF APPLICANTIREMNES A.-Stair 6-Ce-jw"h Aeio*Apacy 8-Irttvuata [-Ni1kae E!"atiow,l:cutwim FS•�ue. I-1Mfiaq Trlt» a Comprehensive Employment and Training Act Dir:tict If.4n+ar Title I E0-coca t/ of }strict DifCnQ Ewtar aypraPratr tattas T A TYPE OF AwIsWicE j !�d Cnel Noara�rs B-Z&ppwe%W Graft Est�j.r IL A� 1(L AREA OF PROTECT UAPACT (H ..s,of e:tit caa+.t:rti 1L ES .mAT.Wi ftU:& L TYPE OF APPLICATION Stata+,a:a) BTR OF PERSONS A-kaw C rae"C" r L:Zmwa ra Contra Costa County excluding GENEF1 �a"s1 D-CalL aatwo E.La appm') . �i Cit o R C1 13. PROPOSED FL'NCING 13. CO:IGPE=ONAL DISTRICTS OF: M TYPE OF CHAKaE V2.j-,-or l:a> 20�896 Mia AaPucw b.M- ECT County ,♦.Tncrew II :ars F-atAer(S�uiJj): ..�y�k I s e-D.va.+�ea::ars b.A2PUM'-f .00 718.9 pcm;o. ST>te .00 16 PRC1cCT STA.RT 17. PROJECT DAT$ Yaora Lk dal CURATIOII E-2-r cDn^r- .GO 19 LIa.:Aa �Q' 1t` 1slt�►{aj e. OTHcx .03 15. EsnMATE•1i GTE TO Y~ w oM 22F ,13. MSTI.V.: F2DEaA'-!ZEAT1:ICATION NUU3E.3 S, St;=I.TED TO r. 17T7t s .a3 F&ERAL AGENCY to 19 7816/ 06-8004-10 2A FEDERAL AGEICY iM RECEIVE REQUEST ( a mo.Cily.SU44ZIPD,ia) RVAARKS ACCED Employment and. Training Admin., S.F. CA 94102 0 Yes Q Tio I .Z a. Ta_4 bwt t!«v 4edeif+4.1 I•d:rrl. d It ravaired!f QUI GTWW"S d'n rdiC&U:- wa: twxwt to iw- NO n :�ryr.w day b i.`.n a.= stnimon Dwon. b*pp uric s dor:Tvaw.s aa1 29 :a7odL`a arm a.L':.!': :'power THE L.fo ►rd cufast. I%o 1010"at law tar AN-UC.ANT d* otw--ul by Na to.raint Tdp Co CERTI.HES iia arrpkwt wick Ute.RS.ant.iA=-Q;) a) State C1ea-i 91 0 1-HATP- with ""t"� " " tm�"'�' p Associatio O rea Governments Q 0 Taw b,t:ro.t1 F 23. a.WED nu(E AND TITLE z SK DAME s Yu. aces 1 Z7 >; CER.FYIN Robert I. Schroder sENTA Wr- Chairman, Board of Su ervi or 1sy8 G z7 ZA.i1Gi:.^:4:Y !!ALAE{ r 2S.APPLI A- Year TIJf, RECe1VE*? 19 2s. ORA.+.liteAnO.1"L U141T ADWHISTRATIVE OFFICE 23. FErEPTI. A?PLIG:TIOft 1•JE.Y:.r GT1C;I C 23.dLcailFca 3tL FcCERAL C?.3:i: IJEt1:ti MAA. Y 1t SL ACT10:1 Ti.(f4 FUND114G r cr wow:7► d� I a:. Y� -mCi cslf 1 0].X.A:: M a Fs^.Citi 3 (s-�� 14 't�:InG .D� 33.ALT'.^t1 aAs�> t9 ce:: •'t 4. 6Lt'L?T_i) d. /PRtJhf ( ,p0 3S CONTACT FOR A'JJITIONAL 13FO -- 7.6. Y:.: +rvs:T► G:r I � t �L:'i:�E0�i c.j'1.::E •� � Com(-''F: _ C ).;:E--xi`.�T e- LarAL .CO r 37. RLS: Azzzo f2. 2+•ins-'AriM f. T;.T2L S .00 Q t;,_ I •. In Uke.1 a:.os.wYier. ,Try ct•rn-ti t.o.:nA! L-.+d• iovb-.Oa�++Cv -f Q filixzt P..i.•.CY j-d. If r/%�7^?�•�•I dua uMM Wve ueu of Iwt 1.C1IY QK---A-4-i. lYan.O.r::sf:�.w.rtii ?'E•'AL ACENC/ ( tt:mss_:fw or U 9nnt rear_ i.-4S nLT10N 6:4-101 - Srw.4t}.1.ZJ FAti;i :.Zt PA.:E 1 Q,`vq Lp GiA.i.d.roi.i.u:ierrat Cvr.�:r rl.•T MODIFICATIONS IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TITLE I AFINUAL PLAN (2,o. 06-8004 210D No. 803) . The primary purpose of the modification to the annual plan is to transfer $426,896 in carryover funds from FY 1977 into the Ff 1978 Title I budget with all of these funds placed in the cost categories of allowances and supportive services. The unexpectedly high number of carryover participants from FY 1978 along with the number of participants placed in free Individual Referral training slots, has necessitated the expenditure of funds for allowances far in excess of what was originally planned. In addition to this aformentioned major change to the Budget Information Summary (BIS) , planned costs, as reflected in the original FY 1978 BIS, have been adjusted to reflect actual costs incurred to date. 00895)_ ' I..rll !1(.(U.!l.11 11•! . ..111'./'i I /r11.111•In (ldtq '1/17/71 A. GIIAPiTI?ti'S NAME AND AUUTIE5S U.S, 0r1`AnTMc1`4r or LAnOrr 0. GRANT NUMBrill Cuunty OC' Contra Costa iFmployment anti Tralnlnt Adminittretlnn B(Dard O Slip ervis'jr.,> 06-8004-10 -"-_ MOD 803 J:51 fine street BUDGET INFORMATION SUMMARY C. TYKE or Pno`0nn�n Hartinez , CA 911553 1, X Title 1 3. 0 Tille 111 n, IJ Tnle vi 2• 0 Tllla Ii (,iprci/v)................................. O. Pon nEGIONAL OFFICE USE ONLY CONTRACT KEY MOD, OATC 7 Cr7 - 1 Q u Q $v > � �E3 0° ti Ev Z ~ ux O it a +n t` Z �a Z s S MM bD YY G 0 Col. l z 3 A S G -7 0 7 In 11 11 IJ 14 15 1G 17 10 l7 20 2t 22 2J 24 20 2G 27124 29 30 E. IJUUGET SUMMARY COST CATEOOIIIES a. GRANT P110CRA MCSTIMATLL) UNCXI'[NDED FUNDS NEW Oil IIIEVISM t)UUOCT FUNC110N OR ACTIVITY --- --- I. TOTAt- -_..._- te. Vallural a Non -adeual d. rederAl - e, Non I'nuernl -' r'�s"r�zT�z'TaT�r r`, -^ r �i 7 r, '7:• � ---- -' --^ate-- 7 -_ 21 2G 1-21 1. Administtallon f a# , •?' t •. ` tir,r ,�v ' • G - 616,151.00 I:,���U���" � L t�. ;'•••. 2. Allow-Incet ',+1 7f / > -La_ ' •�, r. �� .�.1. �•' ��s iI ,.-i d M ai-•'•'.^�•+:-'! 35 ti..• ).1/•�i + ) ��:� 13', s s fs7 z s, . 3.-Wages 939230.00 J'rs .,ell 44 388,991.00 fi�' �fl} , -4. Fringe Dcnotlis 'y�, Fv i. _ _ + ; s3 7,435.00 5. Training w•jt'�1. L>.. I _ 817,829.00 2 't1{. l 1y 6. Servicer ( yll��` _ 1 2 3y 21 26 i- t -s...t__•_-.._4 - 7. Totals p -0- 49068,247.00 49068,247.00 F. CUMULATIVE OUARTERLY PROJECTIONS OF OBLIGATIONS AND EXPENDITURES War Quarto Ending) 1 2 7 21 22 2al24124 1 2 1 2 3 2 27 2J 24 25 - 1 7 3 '; 2.1 2: 2- 74 75 -- a�ss `1110 0 j 8IT -- L it- 26 25 26 7G Prime Sponsot Obligations p 3 2,447,4511.00 O 3 .2,673,934.00 0 3 3,4090067 00 G 3 )1,060,247.00 _ 2. Total Projected Expcnditurra by Program 35 i;;': :•':` 767378.00 3 1 .676.358.00 b 35 2,706 90 11.00 Il' '' 35 4 OG8 ' 47.00 _ i .. ,2 a. Clamoom Training, Prime Sponsor , a 44 301,008.00 �> " 4 673 121.00 ) j" 4 1,209,173.00 ^;? '?, 44 1 781 890.00 - b. On-the-Job Training , 53 66 765.00 N Hx. 5 132 456.00 53 193,557.00 1 53 315-X147.00 C. Public Service Employment it � 62 -0- '` 62 -0- 62 -0- n i%4 G2 -0- _ d. Work Experience n 71 127,92 00 71 307 328.00 :I 71 498 003.00 ;; 111 648 928.00- 1 2 3 26 ! 2 3 26 1 2 3 26 1 2 3 20 e. Services to Parllclpant: G 4 271 681.00 O 4 563 453.00 p 4 8062171.00 G - e 1 L322j282.00 I. Other Activities 36 -0- 35 -0- N35- -0- 3. i'rolected Expenditure: for Vocational Ed. • ; 44 ! t,. 44 44 44 r r_ In Special Giants to Oovcrnorr ,� 28 032.00 .tl ' 65 409.00 � 110,5'13.00 + $5 _ 155 73_8._00_ _ 4. Protected Expenditures of lion-Fed, Funds 53_ 0- m 53 -0- 53 -0- a 53 0- 5. Othcu Fed. Funds, Not In Primes Spon.Grant 1 62 -0- 62 -0- 62 -0- `' � 6'7. -0- 6. Grand 'Totrl • Projected Expenditures 1,! 71 , 795,410!00 S ;� 71 1,741,767.00 �� 912,83-7,L17 .00 ,.i '�1 - 4,223,9E15.yo'� C'rA 5.1.15 (Jun. if176) In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 19 In the Matter of Establishing a Commencement Date for the Lease with Relocatable Confinement Facilities Company for the Module Erected at 847 Brookside Dr., Richmond IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that June 26, 1978 is hereby established as the commencement date for the lease dated February 28, 1978 between Relocatable Confinement Facilities Company of Hayward, California as Lessor, and County of Contra Costa as Lessee, for the module erected at 847 Brookside Drive, Richmond, California. PASSED by this Board on June27, 1978 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of as order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department, Supervisors Lease Management affixed this 27th day of Jane 19_1 cc: County Administrator Public Works Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller (via L/M) By lr,C�l�y�f,� �'X ,. Deputy Clerk Lessor (via L/M) Jamie L. Johnson Buildings and Grounds (via L/M) Sheriff-Coroner (via L/M) H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California ,lune 27 . 19 78 In the Matter of Agreement Amendment with Boeing Computer Services Company On the recommendation of the County Auditor-Contraller IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to - execute an amendment to a January 3, 1978 agreement with Boeing Computer Services Company for the coding'and testing of the Martinez Data Center data input and processing programs. Said amendment to extend the completion date from April 28, 1978 to May 31, 1978. Passed by the Board on June 27, 1978. w s � I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig. Dept. : Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: (c/o Data Processing) Supervisors Contractor affixed this27th day of_ June . 19 78 Auditor Data Processing J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Administrator Law and Justice By. .r-/� 1t �,�r�. , Deputy Clerk .Jamie L. Johnson 0U89.Q H-24 3/7615m AGREEMENT AMENDMENT This amendment , dated April 19, 1978 , is to amend the agreement between Contra Costa County and Boeing Computer Services , Inc. , for the Municipal Courts Criminal Calendaring System--Martinez Data Processing Center Data Input and Processing Programs , passed by the Board January 3 , 1978, as follows : 1 . Change Section 1 . (c) Effective Date : from January 3 , 1978 through April 28, 1978, to January 3 , 1978 through May 31 , 1978. 2. This will not affect any other section of the original agree- ment. 3 . Signatures . These signatures attest the parties ' agreement hereto : CONSULTANT BOEING COMPUTER SERVICES COMPANY Q.X.Q..- _ :. r_ .• ' (Designateeffficial capacity in business ) F. D. Taylor, Contracts Representative Washington i State of 9aAxx&6LxndA) ss County of King ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities , personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he signed it and that the cor- poration or partnership named above executed the within instru- ment pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors } Date 4/28/78 (Seal ) i Notary Public i F PUBLIC AGENCY FORM APPROVED CONTRA COST NTY John B . Clausen, County Counsel By: j R. 1.Schroder By: (Cifairmarn, Board of Supervisors Deputy ; .7j%,cyofilmed with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 . 78 In the Matter of Agreement with Tesseract Corporation On the recommendation of. the County Auditor-Controller, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that -its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with Tesseract Corporation , which company will code and test the programs for the Retirement Subsidiary Ledger system, at a cost of $21 ,462, 'for the period June 27, 1978 through September 29, 1978. Passed by the Board June 27, 1978 r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and corned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of O r i g. Debt. : Auditor Supervisors cc: All c/o Data Proc. affixed this 27thday of June . 19 78 Contractor — Auditor Data Proc. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Administrator eyn/r ,.i �/�.// , Deputy Clerk Jamie L. Johnson H•24 3/76 15m V s AGREEMENT For Professional Services : Programming 1 . Parties. Effective June. 27, 1978 The County of Contra Costa, hereinafter called "County, and TESSERACT CORPORATION hereinafter called "Contractor" , promise and agree as follows : 2. Work. Contractor shall , at its own expense , furnish all labor and material required to provide- the County with the programs defined in the Program Specifications Documentation , dated May 26 , 1978 ' —for—Retirement Subsidiary Ledger Svstem hereinafter referred to as "the work" , written in IBM OS ANS COBOL Ver. 4 to operate on the County' s IBM 370-155 computer Except as expressly authorized in writing and approved bpi the County Data Processing Manager, the !•tori; shall be in strict compliance with the program specifications documentation entitled , Program Specifica- tions Documentation Retirement Subsidiary Ledger System dated May 26 , 1978 hereinafter referred to as "the Documenta- tion) , by this reference incorporated herein as on file at the office Of the Contra Costa County Auditor-Controller, Office Services Divi- sion , at the date of execution of this Agreement . All programs shall be executable in 64K partition, utilizing no more input/output records , files and devices than indicated for each oroaram 'in the Documentation. Any deviation from the above specifications must be authorized in writing and approved by the County Data Processing Manager. 3 . Standards and Reports . Systems Analysis and Programming required hereunder shall conform to Part A (Mandatory Requirements ) of the EDP Systems and Programming Standards Manual as adopted by the County Supervisor ' s Association of California , which is in effect and on file at the Office of the Contra Costa County Auditor- Controller, Office Services Division , as of the date of this Agree- ment. Contractor shall maize bi-weekly progress reports to the County ' s Systems Accountant and Programmer Analyst. 4. Changes . Changes and modifications in 'this Agreement may be made by prior written change order of the County ' s Data Processing Manacer, accepted in writing by the Contractor , specifying such change(s) , including adjustment(s ) to price and delivery schedule (if any) , as are agreed to by the parties hereto. In no case 'shall County pay for any extra work or material furnished except as agreed upon in such a change order. 5. Time. Contractor shall complete and deliver the Mork to County Data Processing Manager by the dates specified in Exhibit A , Payment Schedule , attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein . The County Data Processing Manager shall , if the Mork is satisfactory, accept the completed Work in writing. Except as agreed in a written chance order, the time for completion and delivery shall only be extended by a time equal to delay to .Contractor solely caused by the County, its software , or its employees . 6. Price . In consideration of Contractor' s fulfillment of the promises and conditions herein, and as full compensation for the 'Mork , County shall pay Contractor, pursuant to the- Payment Schedule (Exhibit A) set forth herein , the total price of S 21,462 subject to County ' s rights of termination , deduction and withhold as said rights are specified in Paragraphs 11 , 12, 13 and 14. 00901 Microfilmed with board order e 7. Payments . County will pay Contractor the full amount of the contract when all programs have been completed and accepted by County' s Data Processing Manager. . 8. Pro ertX. Upon payment for any part of the Work by County, such part o the-Work becomes the property of the County. As to such property of the County and as to any part of the Work in process not yet delivered or paid, Contractor agrees not to permit any disclosure or distribution of the Work or any part thereof or information concern- ing same or any reproduction thereof, without the prior written consent of County, which written consent may be given only by County' s Data Processing Manager. 9. Incidental Services . Notwithstanding any other provision contained herein , Contractor shall provide the following services to County without cost or charge other than the price for the Work as set forth in Paragraph 6: (a) Complete documentation of the Work to standards . specified herein . Such documentation shall not conflict with the programming language used nor with the constraints of the logic of any program in the Work nor with the Documentation. (b) Testing and debugging at Contractor' s facility. (c) Correction of all latent errors appearing within * three months of acceptance of the .•lork , notwith- standing changes and additions performed by Contractor or County after acceptance ; but changes to any of the Work which are not performed by Contractor shall release Contractor from its responsibility to correct errors in that part of the Work affected by such changes . (d) On-call assistance as requested by County during final systems acceptance cycle . 10. Test Data . County agrees to furnish Contractor sufficient. test data to adequately test and determine that each program is completed and operating in accordance with the Documentation . 11 . Failure of Contractor to Complete and Deliver the Work on Time . If the Contractor fails to complete and deliver the Work within the time fixed therefor but does eventually complete the Work , this Agreement not having been terminated by County by the time of eventual completion , Contractor shall .become liable to the County for County ' s loss and damage therefrom; and because it is and will be impracticable and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the County' s actual damage from any delay in performance hereof, it is agreed that the Contractor will pay as ' liquidated damages to the County the amount of $50. 00 per calendar day for each day ' s delay in furnishing the Work. If said liquidated damages are not paid by Contractor, County may, in addition to any other rights and remedies under this Agreement, deduct said liquidated damages from any money due or to become due Contractor under this Agreement; but said { liquidated damages shall not exceed the total price specified in Paragraph 6. . 00 902 12. Termination for Convenience of County. At any time during the- period of this Agreement , County may, at its option , terminate this Agreement for the convenience of County upon ten (10; days pr:cr wr: .te, notice to Contractor. Upon term.i:atior, for the convenience of County, County shall pay, without duplica- tion, the amounts set forth in Exhibit A (Payment Schedule). for all the Work then' completed' and delivered to County by Contractor. • County shall also pay Contractor a pro rata share of the price for the percentage of the Work in process that has been completed but not yet delivered to County. Such pro rata payment for the Work in process shall be computed on the basis of progress reports sub- mitted to and accepted by County. In consideration of such pay- ment, Contractor waives all right to other payment or damages , and .agrees to turn over to County everything .pertaining to the Work accomplished by Contractor up to the time of termination. • 13. Termination for Breach of Contractor. If Contractor at any time fai s , refuses , or neglects to perform its duties under this -Agreement in a reasonable, satisfactory manner and fails to remedy such condition within a period of . 10 days of Contractor ' s receipt of written notice thereof by County - County may terminate this Agreement because of said breach of Contractor. In the event this Agreement is terminated for breach pursuant to this paragraph , Contractor shall become liable to County for County ' s Toss and • damage therefrom; and because it is and will be impracticable and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the County ' s actual damage from said breach of the Contractor, it is agreed that Contractor will pay as liquidated damages to the County the amount of $50. 00 per calendar day from the date the Work. should have been, delivered according to this Agreement to the date the 'Work is otherwise completed by the County. If said liquidated damages are not paid by Contractor , County may, in addition to any other rights and remedies under this Agreement, deduct said liquidated damages from the amounts due or to become due the Contractor under this Agreement; but said liquidated damages shall not exceed the total price specified in Paragraph 6. 14 . No Waiver by County. Inspection of the Mork by the County; or the statement by any officer, agent or employee of the County, prior to written acceptance of the Work or any part thereof, indicating that the t•;ork or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or County ' s payments for the whole or any part of the 'fork , or any combination of these . acts', shall not relieve the Contractor of its obligations to ful - fill this Contract as prescribed ; nor shall the County be thereby stopped from withholding as liquidated damages monies due the Contractor or bringing any action for such damages or any action for enforcement arising from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Waiver of any provision of this Agreement by County in any single instance shall not prejudice County's right to enforcem..nt of all provisions of this Agreement in any other instance. 15. Hold Harmless . Contractor agrees to defend , save , idem- nify and hold harn7T—ess the County and its officers and employees from any and all liabilities -and claims for damages for death , sickness , disease and/or injury to person (s ) and/or property arising from or connected with Contractor ' s performance of this Contract. 16. Insurance. During the entire term of this Agreement, Contractor shall keep in effect a policy or policies of insurance for all of its employees performing under this Agreement, with limits of at least $250 ,000 for each pe-rson and $500 ,000 for each accident for all damages arising out of death , bodily injury, sickness or disease from such accident and at- least S50,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident. Contractor shall provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance , namir.q- County as a co-:ry;xred , as evidence of the above specified coverage, 900 -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Santa Clara SS. s On June 19, 1978 before me. Z" o the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State. $ personally appeared FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP Gary nurhin d �IIIfillttttlFti111111!111111llltllttiltttlliHltliDlllliff}; 'c known to me OFRCIAL SEAL V to be the person whose name subscribed to the = SUSAN L STECKEL within instrument and acknowledged thatNOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA-executed the �� PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN same. = SANTA CLARA COUNTY U � My�tAtltliittlltitiatlIIItCSIm.tt11IExp. ltltMarch itlliilit!!!1 11 _:1 ti rA 00,904 • Susan L. Steckel Name (Typed or Printed) Notary Public in and for said County and State Contractor shall also provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing that Workmen ' s Compensation Insurance cover- age is provided Contractor' s employees . 17 . Independent Contractor Status . This Agreement is by and between two independent Contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee , partnership , joint venture or association. 18. Nonassi nable . This Agreement binds the heirs , successors , assigns , and representatives of Contractor. Contractor shall not assign this Agreement, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without County' s 'prior written consent. 19. Notices . Ali notices provided for by this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail , certified or registry service , postage prepaid. All notices appertaining to the provisions of this Agreement shall be addressed to Contractor' s office located at P.O. Box 7658 , San Francisco, CA 94120 Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors , County Administration Building , 651 Pine Street, Martinez , California 94553. ,. The effective date of all notices shall permit a minimum of two days for transit in the mails . _ CONTRACTOR By. Desi a Of ficial C pa i y in Business CONTRA C 4TY By / R.i.Schroder Ch firman , Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM JOHN B . CLAUSEN , County Counsel By MICHAEL D. FARR Deputy County Counsel Note to Contractor: (1 ) Execute acknowledgement form below; and 2 if a corporation , affix corporate seal above. State of California) ss Contra Costa County) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The person signing above for Contractor, known to me in those individual and business capacities , personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he signed it and that the corpor- ation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date (Seal ) Notary Public -4- 1 . EXHIBIT A Payment Schedule The following programs are -due completed September 29, 1978 : Program Program Name FT4592A Convert Retirement Masterfile FT4592B Capture Subvention Amount from DOS Payroll. Syst. FT2201 Transaction Edit ` FT2202 Master Update FT2203 Miscellaneous Reports FT2207 Active Member Ledger FT2208 Inactive Member- Ledger FT2204 Annual Letters FT2209 Address File Update r jil 'i r . 3 I -.<s - i i l —C s `t } r. - .J_ 3 00906 In the Board of Supervisors of Conga Costa County, Stag of California June 27". , 1978' In the Matter of Approving Deferred Improveiiient- Agreement for LUP 2001-75, Byron area. The Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute a Deferred Improvement Agreement with- Robert F. Mygrant, et al,. permitting the deferment of construction -of permanent imaro.Terents required as a condition of approval for LUP 2001-75, Byron area_ PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978- . Y j hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of tete order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the data aforesaid. Originating Department : PW (LD) Wjtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc-: Recorder (via P.W. ) ofrixt-d this 27t!?Jay of June 19 78 Public Works Director Director of Planning County Assessor J. R. OLSSON, Cleric Robert F. Mygrant By Deputy Clerk P. O.Box 878 Byron, CQ 94514 Sandra L: Ni_ on S 1 H-24 4,77 15m i. t. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 , 19 78 in the Matter of Closure of Certain Streets for Fourth of July Celebration on July 4, 1978, Danville Area. It is by the Board ORDERED that permission is granted the San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce to close Danville Highway ' from Las Barrancas to Boone Court including North Hartz Avenue, South Hartz Avenue, and San Ramon Valley Boulevard on July 41 ' : 1978 between 9:15 A.M. to 1:2 :30 P.M. In addition it is requested that Del Amigo Road be closed from Danville Boulevard to Las Barrancas from 9:30 A.M. to 12 :30 P.M. the same day. - The ' closure is subject to conditions set forth relative to parades in Resolution No. 4714. T PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. r 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of oA order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Department : PWD (LD) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc : Public Works Director affixed this 27th day of June 19 78 San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce (via P. W. ) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B a Deputy Clerk Sandra L: Ni fson 00,908 H-24 4/77 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27, , 19 78 In the Matter of FEES FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES The Board, on June 26, 1978, having received. a. memorandum dated June 19, 1978, .from the Public Works Director,. proposing fees for various Public Works Services; and The Board members having, discussed the matter- and .having adopted Resolution $78/629 approving recommendation No. 3 relating to establishment of'a Survey Monument Preservation Fund; Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED THAT the recommendations relating to Development Related Fees, Encroachment Permits, and Franchise Fees are REFERRED to, the Finance Committee (Supervisors E. H. ' Hasseltine and C.. * Fanden) for review and report. PASSED by The Board on June' 27,' 1978 . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originating Department PW (JMW) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this 27 day of June 19 78 County Administrator County Counsel Committee Members J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Sandra L. Nielson H-24 4/77 i5m • . o PUBuc WORn DEPARTUMT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date: Ju 19, 1978 To: Board of Supervisors From: Vernon L. Cline,. Public Works Director Subject: Proposed fees for Public Works Services In response to the directives of the Board of Supervisors concern- ing establishment of fees for services rendered for special interest activities of the department and a review of existing fees . to insure that they are current, the following .information is offered: 1. Development Related Fees: The Land Development Division of. the department provides three major functions related to development :applications. They are: a) Review of applications to insure conformance with County ordinances concerning streets, flood control and other Dublic f="-' =ties; b) Checking of improvement plans to insure that the improve- ment design is in accordance with County ordinances and the conditions of approval; c) Checking of Final Maps and Parcel Maps to insure. that they are in conformance with state law and County ordinances. For many years, the County has charged a fee for item c) above. This fee also covered the costs of field inspection, materials testing and surveying connected with the development. For the last 15 years or more, this fee has been 5% of.-the construction cost of the public improvements (roads and storm drains) connected with the development. Two months ago, the department recommended, and the Board adopted an additional 2% fee to cover the costs associated with item b) above. While the Planning Department has collected a fee for development applications, none of that fee is passed through to the Public Works Department to cover costs associated with item a) above. Last year approximately 1,000 applications of various types were processed by the Land Development Division. Of these,. 650 required substantial staff time at a cost of approximately $110;000. n RECOMMENDATION 40910 It is recommended that the fee changes presented by the Planning Department and adopted by the Board of Supervisors June 16, 1978, Microfiirned with board order Board of Supervisors -2- June 19, 1978 be amended to include charges for Public Works application review. Specifically, it is recommended that the filing fees be revised to include the following amounts: Land Use Permit (other) .$150 Development Plan Permit No new -buildings proposed -0- All 0 All others $150 Minor Subdivisions $150 Subdivisions $225 Planned Unit District (Rezoning) $225 While most of the other applications listed in the aforementioned proposed Planning Department fee schedule are reviewed by Public Works, the time spent is very minor and• a charge would not be appropriate. At the direction of the Board of Supervisors, a program budget for all Public Works departmental activities has .been -developed. While" the County Auditor has not been able -to convert the County's accounting system over to the program system, Public -Works has internally been making the conversions division by division: Land Development was the first of the engineering divisions. to convert and accounting fox• t]Tat division is being. done in a program mode for all the various activities of that division. This will make it very easy to monitor the costs of each activity, determine the appropriateness of the fees being charged and recommend adjustments- to the Board of .Supervisors as appropriate. 2. . Encroachment Permits For many years the County has charged one dollar for an encroachment permit. Encroachment permits are required whenever a private party desires to do construction in or use the public right-of-way in such manner that it will permanently alter the public property or temporarily restrict the use of the right-of-way by others. These activities are listed below_ Public Works issues almost 2,000 `encroachment permits a year. Activities in connection with the permits include review of the application for conformance to applicable ordinances .and policies, occasionally a field review to check actual condi tions, typing the permit form, minor inspection and accounting for the one dollar fee. _ It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt the following schedule of fees for encroachment- permits. These fees will cover the entire cost of the activity: Board of Supervisors -3- Tune 19, 1978 Present Proposed Anticipated' Fee Fee Revenue 1. Application and Investigation Fee for Encroachment Permit (typically - driveways, -side- $1 $20 $25,000 walk cross drains, etc. ) 2 . Permit Fee for Excavation $20 plus 1 within the right of way for $1 .$.10 per $23 ,000 street cuts and trenches sq. ft. utilities) inspec.fee 3 . Permit Fee for Frontage $1 plus $20 plus Improvements (curb, gutter, 5% plan 7% plan $1,000 sidewalk, pavement widening, review & review & _ longitudinal drainage, re- insp. fee insp. .fee taining walls) 4 . Permit Fees for structures, fences or other facilities $1 $20 $11,000 to be constructed or placed -within the right of way 5. Fee for transportation $10 per $20 per permits (oversize or ovdr- move or move' or- $6 ,000 weight loads) $100 $200 annual annual permit permit 6 . Permit Fee for house move $100 $100 (0-2 hrs*) $150 (2-4 hrs*) $200 (4+ hrs*) *duration of move $4 ,000 Total anticipated revenue . . . . $70 ,000 3. Survey Monument Preservation Fund In 1976 , the State Legislature passed a law (Chapter 881,_ Statutes of 1976) , which allows Counties to establish a Survey Monument Preservation Fund, financed by a fee of up to $10 charged at the time of recording of all grant deeds conveying real property except those which convery entire lots shown on final maps of subdivisions. The fees collected must be used to finance the reestablishment or remonumentation of major historical land division lines such as government section lines, rancho lines, grant lines and subdivision boundary lines. For many years the County maintained two survey crews for this purpose. About five years ago, with the advent of new precise distance measuring equipment, one of the crews was eliminated and the activity is currently done with a single crew consisting of four persons. The cost of the crew, 00912 Board of Supervisors -4- June 19, 1978 including men and equipment, is about $65,000 per year_ At least three counties; Ventura, Santa Barbara and Los Angeles have implemented this legislation at the maximum $10 fee. It is estimated that a $10 - fee in Contra Costa County would generate about $40,000 to. $45,000 per year which would largely offset the costs for the existing survey crew. RECOMMENDATION .It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt a reso- lution establishing a Survey Monumentation Preservation Fund in Contra Costa County for the purposes specified in Section 27584 of the California Government Code, to be financed--by a .$10 fee charged and. collected.by the County Recorder at the time of recordation of all grant deeds except as specified in the State law. 4. Franchise Fees For several years the Board of Supervisors has expressed con- cern over whether fees for franchises are adequate to cover costs. Since this is a very.minor activity and therefore the fees derived very small, the review of this .activity has given way to higher priority activities. Franchise feet. are charged to private corporations for the long term use .:f public rights of, way: In this County, almost all franchises are for product pipe lines in street right of way. The current fee is one-half cent per inch diameter of the pipe per foot of length within the public right-of-way. Since there is no real cost to the County in administering the franchise, the fee is arbitrary and is. really a fee for the privilege of using the County right-of-way. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Public Works Department proceed to review the appropriateness of the franchise fees and prepare a recommendation to the Board. It should be noted that franchise agreements specify the fee and are long -term, generally 40 years, so any change in the fee structure would only apply to new fran- chises. Currently less than one franchise request a year is processed by the Department. VLC/JMW:jb cc: County Administrator I Anthony Dehaesus, Planning Director Land Development Division • 00913 CONTRA. COSTA COUNTY PLANNING DEPARMENT Proposed Fee Changeo June 13, 1978 Qr C7 Current Proposed EIR EIR Action Proposed Filing Assessment Appeal Filing* Assessment Appeal Land .Use Permit (Mobile Home in R- District) $ 90 $ 0 $ 50 $100 ,r $ 50 $ 75 {0+,}:e r) 90 0 50 300-,- )a b 50 50 Variance Par,::it 50 - 75 0 30 - 50 100 50 75 Development Plan Pei-It 100 - 2000 60 - 100 5 : -- skid Z50 100 %nor Subdivisions 100 0 200 400+/50 50 100 Subdivisions 100 200 0 r 60 '- 1.00 ]je0'GF=+SZ:; sk`td-�O 200 2 . Rezoning 200 0 100 1000 50 500 Plane d Unit District (Rezoning) 200 0 100 50 500 (Final Development Plan) 200 0 100 t5 17--� 50 200 Agricultural Preserve Rezoning 150 0 100 300 50 1.50 Other Special Permit 90 0 50 300 . 50 100 General Plan Amendment 0 .0 0500 5O 200 General Plan Amendment (Pre) 0 0 0 200 *Concurrent submittal requires payment of'highest applicable fee only. � k PROPOSED FEE CHANGES DEVELOPMENT PLAN :Multiple Family Residential District, - 50 dwelling units or more $1 ,000 -}- `iso :Commercial-Office Districts, 10 acres or more 1',000 4- ISo :No new buildings proposed 100V :Other 500-1- $J5a SUBDIVISIONS :$200 f $50 per lot under 50 lots 4- : :$25 per lot, 50 to 250 lots :$5. per lot over-250 lots PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT :Same as subdivisions - Final Development Plan :$500 if substantially same as Prelimi- nary Development Plan - Final Development Plan :75% of original fee if substantially ' different- from Preliminary Development ,. Plan -• Tentative Sub. Map :$500 REZONING :Any Ag.- District to-any Single Family Residential District $ 300 :Any Single Family to Single Family Residential District 300 :Any district to Multiple Family Resi- dential District 1 ,000 :Any district to any Commercial or Industrial District 11000 :Any other district not covered above 500 :Appeals would be one-half of original fee C.C.C.P.D. 6/16/78 00915 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 27 019 78 In the Matter of Appeal of E1 Sobrante Community Association from Planning Commission conditional approval of Subdivision 5308, El Sobrante area. Ivan Goyak & George Vila, owners. WHEREAS on the 16th day of May, 1978 the County Planning Commission approved with conditions the tentative map 'of Subdivision 5308, E1 Sobrante area, filed by Ivan Goyak and George Vila-, owners; WHEREAS within the time allowed by Law, E1 Sobrante Community Association, filed with this Board an appeal from said action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that a hearing be held on said appeal before this Board in its Chambers, Room 107, - County Administration Building, Martinez, California, on Tuesday, the 18th day of July, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. and the Clerk is directed to publish notice of hearing, pursuant to code requirements. PASSED by the Board on June 27, 1978. ip I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of do order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: El Sobrante Community Association Witness my hand,and the Seal of the Board of Ivan Goyak and George Vila upervisors Director of Planning affixed this 27th_day of jiine 19•x$ Nares provided by Planning Public Works Director Land Development J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Building Inspection By Deputy Clerk Ro bie G ierrez • 0091 H-24 4177 15m E EIV C E CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JUN al,/ 1978 PLANNING DEPARTMENT J. R. =50N ClEit BOARD OF SUPIAVISOU A . ,CONT CL:SiA CO. »Doaufy TO: Board of Super i vos rs DATE: June 21 , 1978 FROM: Anthony A. Dehaesus �I SUBJECT: APPEAL, Subdivision 5308 Director of Planni Ivan Goyak and George Vila (E1 Sobrante area) OWNERS: Ivan Goy k and George Vila, 25 Bryan Way, Orinda DEVELOPERS: Robert Chabre and Frank Galli, 2464 -Prosperity Way,, San Leandro. ENGINEER: Kister, Sav_io E Rei , 11818 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito. APPELLANT: Richard Salter, President, El Sobrante Community Association, P. 0. Box 925, E1 Sobrante. PUBLIC HEARINGS: May 9, 1978 - Hearing closed. Decision May 16, 198. May 16, 1978 - Subdivision approved. APPEAL FILED: May 26, 1978. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The following people should be notified of your Board's hearing date and time: w Richard Salter, President Ivan Goyak and George Vila El Sobrante Community Assn. 25 Bryan Way P. 0. Box 925 Orinda, Calif. 94563 El Sobrante, Calif. 94803 Robert Chabre and Frank Gall ! Kistel-,, Savio & Rei 2464 Prosperity Way 118187San Pablo Avenue San Leandro, Calif. 94578 El Cerrito, Calif. 94530 El Sobrante Planning S Zoning Committee P. 0. Box 871 El Sobrante, California 94803 See attached list for additional names and addresses. Attachments: Letter of Appeal , Planning Department Acknowledgement, Letter to Appellant Answering Questions in Appeal Letter, Minutes, Map, EIR. AAD: 1sw 009- r/ cc - Subdivision 5308 Miarofilmrtl with board order t Board of Appeals, Subdivision 5308 Page 2 May Valley Association David and Yolanda Wride George H. Schmidt, President 484 La Paloma Road 5017 Sweetwood Drive El Sobrante, Calif. 94803 Richmond, Calif. 94803 William Fellman Tom McDonough 666 Donna Mae Court 683 Appian Way El Sobrante, Calif. 94803 E1 Sobrante, Calif. '948-3 Betty C. Hall Fred Metzger 4402 Appian Way 4480 Jana Vista . . El Sobrante, Calif. 94803 E1 Sobrante, Calif. 94803 Louis and Carol Boblen Aileen Johnson P. 0. Box 743 #3 Johnson Hill Court El Sobrante, Calif. 94803 r E1 Sobrante, Calif. 94803 . Public Works Dept. , Land Development Building Inspection Department 00918 Microti;mad with board order 1 ;•gay 15, 1978 .E • t Mr. Anthony Dehaesus _ •r'•' r. Director of Planning cfl Contra Costa County Planning Department Martinez, CA Subdivision 5308, Goyak -, ,Dear ter. Dehaesus:. We are filing an appeal in regard to the above mentioned development plan. Specifically, we are concerned with the review procedure which was followed. It is our understanding that development plans can be renewed for a period of one year after approval. In this case, this period has long expired: i Apparently, building permits had been renewed for only four of the thirty eight units. , Therefore; we want answers to the following: 1. A detailed explanation of an the permits were renewed; and how they were renewed. 2. An explanation as to why the development plan is still valid, since it has not been renewed.. ' 3. A clarification of whether the review procedure which was followed is proper. h. An explanation as to why--considering the impact this development will have on the community in terms of traffic pollution, wildlife, open space, etc.,-- no EIEC was required. We will appreciate answers to these questions at .youp earliest convenience. . Sincerely, P"&4'a< ichard Salter President, El Sobrante Community Association P.O. Box 925 El Sobrante, CA 94 803 cc Nancy Fanden _ � 0091 fficrofilmed with board order CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA SUBDIVISION 5308: (Owner: Goyak S Galli) A request for approval of a tentative map to subdivide 5.3 acres into 38 condominium residential units in a Multiple Residential District (M-2). Subject property is located northerly of La Paloma Road, approximately 700 feet westerly of Appian Way, in the E1 Sobrante area. (CT 3630) On May 9, 1978 at 7:30 p.m. having been fixed as the time for hearing on this. item, the meeting was declared open by the Chairman. Staff presented the plan and explained the project as submitted by the applicant with 21 conditions for approval and also explained the concerns of the E1 Sobrante Zoning E Planning Committee. The El Sobrante Zoning & Planning Committee recom- mended 6 additional conditions as follows: 1 . Provision for pathways with the landscape plan. 2. Preserve any trees on the site if possible. 3. Re-orientation of Units 3, 4, 5 and 6 to take better advantage of views. 4. Extend road widening and frontage improvements -on easterly La Paloma Road, fronting the adjacent lot at the southeast corner.of the project. 5. Contribute a prorated share toward cost of improvement of La Paloma Road and Appian Way intersection. 6. Provide for a second access road from the development to Appian Way via an 18-foot wide road easement adjacent to the northeasterly corner-of the property. Staff stated that the developer is agreeable to' inclusion of the first 4 conditions in the project, but objected to 5 and 6. Commissioner Phillips asked about the status of the land use permit upon which this project is based. The staff advised that the Building Inspection Office has active building permits on the project. Commissioner Phillips inquired about drainage and was assured by the Department of Public Works Larry Reagan) that the Improvement Plans will be reviewed by Public Works and they must show how drainage will be handled. Mr. Ivan T. Goyak appeared and stated that the applicant agreed to 4 of the 6 condi- tions recommended by the El Sobrante Planning E Zoning Committee, opposed to the second access and contribution to improvement of the Appian Way-La Paloma Road intersection. Mr. Bill Fellman, El Sobrante Planning E Zoning Committee commented on the need for . a second access and also the need for fencing the tot-lot. Mr. David Wade, La Paloma Way, commented on the traffic and width of roads in the area for fire and emergency access. Also, the need for walks and preservation of trees. On May 16, 1978 at a closed hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed conditions and recommendations for amending the conditions as suggested by the El Sobrante Planning & Zoning Committee after having visited the site in the field on May 12, 1978. Commissioner Milano commented that the requirement to provide a second access from Appian Way was not too practical because the road was very s.teep and narrow and brought the traffic down on the people living along that narrow road. That the intersection of La Paloma and Appian Way is pretty wide and does not. need to be improved now. At a later date, a utility pole may be relocated when the Public Works Department has plans to do this work. 00920 Microfiimad with board order j • Subdivision 5308 Page 2 Commissioner Young concurred with the•comments by Commissioner Milano and felt that the widening along the property frontage on La Paloma and the adjacent prop- erty would provide a safe condition for entrance to the property. Commissioner Walton agreed with the other two commissioners .(Milano and Young) , and after seeing the site in the field and learning more of the history of the application, that more units were approved for the property originally and the reduction is something to consider; also that the tot-lot will .be fenced.as agreed to by the applicant. Commissioner Phillips stated that she disagreed with the rest of the commissioners and particularly from a legal standpoint. That permits were issued on the.property` some time ago and they are still active. "it seems tome that there are some serious inconsistencies with the way this entire procedure has gone through." Also the area is reviewing and redoing their General Plan and if we go ahead with the approval of all these plans, it will be too late and we won't be able-to do any- thing about it. There should be a turnaround for emergency vehicles on site. There were valid comments from the community about the project and "1 will be voting against the project". The motion to approve t-he subdivision with staff conditions as modified was made in the motion of Commissioner Milano, seconded by Commissioner Walton and approved by the following vote on May 16, 1978: AYES: Commissioners- Milano, Walton, Compaglia,. Young, Stoddard, Anderson. NOES: Commissioners - Phillips. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. OWNERS: Ivan GoY ak G Geo. Vila ATTEST orman L. Halverson APPLICATION NO. Subdivision 5308 Chief, Subdivision Administration ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 425-100-42 0Oa21 Exhibit "A" Conditions for Approval Subdivision 5308 1. This approval is based upon the tentative map received by the Planning Department April 13, 1978, with a reorientation of Units 3, 4, S and 6 to take better advantage of views: 2. The subdivision shall conform to the provisions in Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. Any variance therefrom must be specifically applied for and shall not be allowed unless listed on the Planning Commission's condi- tional approval statement. 3. In accordance with the provisions in Section 94-4.414 of the Ordinance Code, the owners of all existing easements within areas to be conveyed to- Contra Costa County for road purposes shall consent to the dedication or deeding of the right-of-way. 4. All utility transmission, distribution and service facilities shall be installed underground. (Ordinance Code Chapter 96-10) 5. The minimum grade for curbs on all streets shall be 1%. (Ordinance Code Section 98-6.004) 6. Traffic control signs, stop signs, centerline striping, left-turn channelization and pavement markings at all stop signs will be required. These details shall be shown on the improvement plans. The subdivider's engineer will be advised by the Public Works Department of the various signs, striping and pavement markings required when the improvement plans are submitted for review. 7. Sidewalks shall be constructed on La Paloma Road. (Ordinance Code Chapter 96-8) 8. No mailboxes will be permitted within the sidewalk, path or trail area. The placement of mailboxes within the right-of-way shall conform to current standards of the Public Works Department. The subdivider is advised to contact the Postal Service and find a satisfactory arrange- ment for mail delivery (e.g., request, in writing, delivery to individual or grouped mailboxes behind the sidewalks). 9. The subdivider shall construct pavement widening adjacent to the curb on La Paloma Road. 10. Pavement transitions shall be constructed off-site to conform to the exist- ing pavement on La Paloma Road. The transitions shall be shown on the improvement plans for the subdivision and shall be subject to review by the Public Works Department, Land Development Division. Street improvements on La Paloma Road shall be extended southeasterly of the site, approximately- 110 feet. 11. The Final Map shall not be filed until the building foundations have been constructed and accurately located so as to eliminate the possibility of conflict between the Final Map and the actual location of foundations. If the subdivider elects to file the Final Map before the foundations are constructed, an accurate survey of the completed foundations shall be made and presented to the Public Works Department for review and comparison with the Final Map. 00922 tJL!`j Mitrort;rned :M6 board order Condi tions for Approval - Subdivision 5308 Pale 2 12. In lieu of the standard driveway depression at the Chabre Court connection to La Paloma Road, a standard street connection with 20-foot radius curb returns shall be constructed. 13. Storm drainage originating on the property and conveyed in a concentrated manner shall not be allowed to drain across the sidewalk. The drainage shall be conveyed to a storm drain or, if drained to the street, should be discharged through the curb by means of a County standard sidewalk crossdrain or 3-inch diameter pipes through the curb and under the side- walk. 14. Any section of the storm drainage system which conveys storm water td which the public streets contribute flow shall be installed in a dedicated drainage easement. 15_ The storm drainage system as shown is incomplete. Comment on the system will be made when the improvement plans are submitted for review. 16. Storm water runoff entering and originating within the subdivision shall be collected and conveyed in an adequate drainage system to an -existing natural watercourse or adequate man-made drainage facility without diversion of the watershed. As an alternate, the subdivision shall submit proof to the Public Works Department, Land Development Division, of duly recorded drainage releases from all affected downstream property owners. 17. Provide for a 56-foot wide right-of-way for La Paloma Road instead of 50 feet shown on re tentative map. Pavement width from face of curb for La Paloma Road shall be an 18-foot half-width. 18. Sewage disposal serving this subdivision shall be provided by the Nest Contra Costa Sanitary District. Each individual living unit shall be served by a separate sewer connection. The sewers located within the boundaries of this subdivision shall become an integral part of the Nest, Contra Costa Sanitary District's sewerage collection system. 19. Nater supply shall be by the East Bay Municipal Utility District. Each individual living unit shall be served by a separate water connection: Such water distribution system located within the boundaries of this subdivision shall become an integral part of the East Bay Municipal Utility District's overall water distribution system. 20. Prior to filing the Final Subdivison Map, a landscape and irrigation plan and estimate of cost shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Department for the entire project. With the Final Map, a bond st1,,11 be filed with the Planning Department to assure installation of landscape improvements. Pathways shall be provided to the recreation area and within open space area. Trees on the site-shall be retained where possible. Fencing of the tot-lot shall be included on the land- scape plan. 21. The improvement plans for the private driveways shall show provisions for sufficient turnaround for emergency vehicles to maneuver. BT:dh 4/28/78 5/5/78 o9(.� �2c) Microfilmed with board order 5/9/73 UV.`�� . 5/25/78 And the Board adjourns to meet on ' Ju1Y 5, 1978 at 9: 00 a.m. , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, County Administration Building, Martinez, California. R. I. Schroder, Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK A4-4�� 4 Deputy 1 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF .CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1978, REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSON, COUNTY CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel actions for Human Resources Agency, Civil Service, and Sheriff-Coroner. Approved appropriation adjustments for Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court, County Clerk, Administrator, Superintendent of Schools, and Tassajara, Bethel Island, Crockett-Carquinez, and Oakley Fire Protection Districts; and internal adjustments not affecting totals for Sheriff, Auditor-Controller, District Attorney, County Clerk, Administrator, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, Health, Manpower, Auditor-Controller and Probation. Approved Traffic Resolutions Nos. 2450 and 2451. Granted San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce permission to close certain streets for July 4th celebration, Danville area. Approved the Final Mental Health Budget for FY 1977-78 and directed the Mental Health Director to submit same to the State Department of Health. Authorized reimbursement to R. Cluck for damage to personal property incurred in the line of duty. Approved compromise settlement in connection with lawsuit of Travalini Furniture for tax refund. Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee, to conduct negotiations with various service providers for new or amended contracts for FY 1978-79 and authorized Director to execute contract amend- ment with We Care Society, Inc. to provide one-time funding augmentation. Readopted Urgency Ordinances Nos. 78-43 and 78-44, providing for an increase in Health Dept. fees and permitting fees to be set by resolution Introduced, waived reading, and adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 78-45 correcting errors in Urgency Ordinance No. 78-43 pertaining to certain public health permit fees. Adopted Ordinance No. 78-42 rezoning land in the Alamo area, 2171-RZ, and repealing Ordinance No. 78-39. Requested Clerk to assign time -to Administrator, Los Medanos Community Hospital, for presentation of Hospital' s position relative to the passage of Proposition 13 in connection with allocation of tax revenues. Approved Finance Committee (Supervisors Hasseltine and Fanden) report on the proposal to establish a County Forms Management Demonstration Project and authorized Chairman to execute application to State Department of Benefit Payments for same. Waived Park Dedication Fee for Sub. MS 177-72, Alamo area. 0{}n25 June 271 1978 Summary, continued Page 2 Adopted Urgency Resolution No. 78/635 rescinding cast-of-living. raises for County and District personnel and Urgency Ordinance No. 78-47 amending Ordinance Code relative to County Supervisors' monthly salaries. Approved Health Department's Immunization Initiative Plan for sub- mission to State Department of Health for continuation of the Child Immunization Project. Authorized Director, Human Resources Agency, or his designee, to execute one additional Emergency Residential Care Placement Agreement with G. & M. Blanchard dba Ken-B-Way, Martinez. Waived the requirement for a Consent to Dedication for Sub. MS 56-78, Byron area. Approved rescission of contract with Branaugh Excavating, Inc. for Blackhawk Road Overlay, Danville area; authorized. Auditor-Controller to issue a warrant in consideration for same and exonerated Performance and Payment Bonds in connection therewith. Established a commencement date for the lease with Relocatable Confine- ment Facilities Co. for the module erected in Richmond at the Women's Minimum Security Facility. Approved request of Citation Builders (2200-RZ) to rezone land in the San Ramon area, introduced ordinance in connection therewith and fixed July 5 for adoption of same. Fixed July 18 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of E1 Sobrante Com- munity Assn. from Planning Commission conditional approval of tentative map of Sub. 5308, E1 Sobrante area. Fixed July 25 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on appeal of Mr. and Mrs. A. Reinstein from San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission conditional approval of application for MS 226-77, Tassajara area. Fixed July 25 at 1:30 p.m. for hearing on appeal of The Hofmann Co. from County Planning Commission conditional approval of Sub. 5353, Byron area and for a hearing on the County Planning Commission recommendation with respect to proposed amendment to the County General Plan for West Pittsburg area (Shell Chemical Property). Fixed Aug. 1 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on recommendation of County Planning Commission with respect to request of W. Elizondo (2213-RZ) to rezone land in the Oakley area. Accepted resignation of F. Smith from Developmental Disabilities Area Board V. Reappointed G.Worsham, M. Colarich, and R. Sponenbergh to the Employees' Retirement Board. Appointed C. Poage to the Citizens Advisory Committee for CSA R-9. Appointed J. Laidley to the Countywide Housing and Community Develop- ment Advisory Committee. OfI26 June 27, 1978 Summary, continued Page 3 Reappointed Dr. 0. Wood as alternate for Supervisor J ' P. Kenny, R. Jornlin as alternate for Supervisor R. I. Schroder, and C. Van Marter as alternate for Supervisor W. N. Boggess on the Economic Opportunity Council. Approved Supervisor Hasseltine's recommendation that the membership on the Advisory Council on Aging be increased by one (from 35 to 36) to include the new West Pittsburg Local Committee. Appointed the following persons to the Neighborhood Preservation Committee of the Countywide Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee for the areas as indicated: P. Hernandez, D. Reyes, - and D. Price - North Richmond area; W. Valli - removed from Mountain View area and appointed for Vine Hill; S. Raine and R. Bless - Montalvin Manor area; M. Phillips - Rodeo area; E. Alford - Mountain View area; and F. McNamer - Vine Hill area. Reappointed R. Hogstrom to County Drug Abuse Board. Approved recommendation of Finance Committee to establish an Enterprise Fund in County Medical Services and initial procedures for its implementation. Approved recommendation of Finance Committee relative to estimated costs of Enterprise Fund implementation in. County Medical Services and the Final Report on said fund relative to implementation of policies, plans, procedures and interdepartmental agreements. Denied claims for damages filed by D. Hughes and D. Richardson, J. and L. Vargas, G. Guirguis, G. Martinez, J. Wortham, C. and L. Boss, and the amended claim of 0. Hammer. Authorized Public Works Director to execute Right of Way Contract with Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints re property acquisition, Hilltop Dr. realignment proj, E1 Sobrante. Rejected all bids for construction of Remodel for Family Practice Clinic at County Hospital due to lack of funds and instructed Public Works Diredtor to make recommendation for future action when funds are available. Awarded contract to Oliver de Silva, Inc. for construction of Blackhawk Road Overlay Project, Danville area. As ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, awarded contract to Eagan and Paradiso Construction Co. for construction of Fuel Tanks at Fire Station No. 6, Concord, and Fire Station No. 14, Martinez. As ex officio the Governing Board of County Sanitation District No. 5, extended to July 31 the emergency sewer connection ban, Port Costa area, and adopted Ordinance No. 3. Accepted Consent to Dedication for Roadway Purposes from Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. in connection with Sub. M.S 226-76; Consent to Dedication for Roadway Purposes from East Bay Municipal Utility District in connection with Sub. 5165, and Grant Deed from R. Mygrant, et al, for LUP 2001-75. June 27, 1978 Summary, continued Page 4 Authorized legal defense for H. Ramsay in connection with 'Superior Court Action No. 187809. Ordered that the proposed agreements of R. Chernick and W. Levit in connection with Los Angeles Superior Court Class Action Lawsuit re Municipal Court Judges' salaries be returned unexecuted. Authorized Chairman to execute: Contract with City of Antioch for Office on Aging Title III Older Americans Act funds for equipment purchase for Senior Drop-In Center; Contract Amendments with East County Community Detoxication Center and Bi-Bett, Inc. to continue alcohol services; Contract Amendment with National Council on Alcoholism--Bay Area, Inc for alcohol services upon approval as to form b County Counsel; Annual Plan Modification (CETA Title I) to U.S. Department of Labor; Amendment to agreement with Boeing Computer Services Co. for coding and testing of Martinez Data Processing Center input and processing programs; Agreement with Tesseract Corporation for coding and testing the Retire- ment Subsidiary Ledger System programs; Agreement of Sale with State and City of Richmond for sale of certain parcels to City of Richmond; Certificate of Appreciation for Shig Doi who is retiring after 26 years of service to the County; Certificate of Commendation to Contra Costa Dental Society in acknow- ledgment of the service provided by their volunteers; Contract with Eagle Signal Corporation for purchase of a Computer Aided Dispatch System; Contracts with Schools of Law (U.C. Berkeley, U.C. Davis, Hastings, McGeorge, and Golden Gate) for Work Study Program for law students; Contract with James M. Harcourt for assistance with State claim in connection with AB 3121. Approved Final Alcoholism Program Budget for FY 1977-78. Referred to: Finance Committee recommendations relating to Development Related Fees, Encroachment Permits, and Franchise Fees; Approval No. 78-13 adopted by the State Solid Waste Management Board approving "Notice of Designation of Local Enforcement Agency" submitted by Health Dept. ; and Matter of funding park and recreational service areas (M-17, R-5,6,7, and 8) and of Crossing Guard Services at various schools; County Administrator request from Board of Directors of Alexander Lindsay Junior Museum for an annual allotment fund for the propagation and conservation of fish and game; Director of Planning for report request of T. Sutton that County relinquish development rights granted by previous owner in connection with M.S. 79=76. Denied appeal of Danville Estates Homeowners Association from San Ramon Valley Area Planning Commission conditional approval of LUP 2040-78, Danville area. Acknowledged receipt of communication from Recreation and Natural Resources Commission re its role in coordination of park and recreation activities and natural resource protection. June 27, 1978 Summary, continued Page 5 Approved recommendation of Director of Planning forreallocation of certain contingency funds in the County's Fourth Year Community Develop- ment Program. Adopted the following resolutions: 78/619 through 78/625, authorizing changes in the assessment roll and cancellation of certain delinquent penalties; 78/626, approving Final Map and Subdivision Agreement, Sub. 5280, San Ramon area; ,78/627, approving Final Map and Subdivision Agreement, Sub. 4955, Alamo area; 78/628, eliminating the use of sub-objects of expenditure, other than for fixed assets, from the budget document for FY 1978-79; 78/629, establishing Survey Monument Preservation Fund, including added recording fees; 78/630, approving Parcel Map of Sub. MS 142-76, Orinda area; 78/631, approving Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement, Sub. MS 121-77, Lafayette area; 78/632, approving Parcel Map of Sub. YIS 56-78, Byron area; 78/633, approving Parcel Map of Sub. MS 106-77, Brentwood area; 78/634, approving Parcel Map of Sub. MS 35-78, Pacheco area; 78/636, initiating proceedings and fixing Aug. 8 at 9:30 a.m. for hearing on proposed Orinda Open Space Boundary Reorganization annexation to EBMUD, CSA R-6 and P-4; 78/637, initiating proceedings and approving proposed Annexation No. 78-6 to CSA L-42, without hearing or election; 78/638, As Governing Body of the County and of All the other Public Entities of which it is the Governing Body, rescinding contract cost-of- living increases; - - 78/639, approving Parcel Map of Sub. MS 5-78, Martinez area,- 78/640; rea;78/640; approving Parcel Map of Sub. MS 239-77, Brentwood area; 78/641, accepting as complete construction improvements in Sub. 4631, San Ramon area, and accepting the widening of San Ramon Valley Blvd. into the County maintained road system; 78/642, revising Planning Dept. fee schedule in accordance with Bo ard'.s_determination of June 16; 78/643, As Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, approving Final EIR and Zone Plan Amendment No. 6 to Flood Control Zone 3B Project, Lower Pine-Galindo Creek, Concord..area;_ 78/644, As Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of County Storm Drainage District, dissolving Drainage Zone 29A, Oakley area; 78/645, As Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, accepting conveyance of property located in former Storm Drainage District 29A; 78/646, accepting as complete construction improvements in Sub. 4656, San Ramon area, and declaring certain roads as County.roads; 78/64,7, accepting as complete construction improvements in Sub. 4819, San Ramon area, and declaring certain roads as County roads; 78/648, accepting as complete improvements on E1 Dorado Dr. , San Ramon area, and declaring same a County road; 78/649, accepting as complete construction contract for Franciscan Way Culvert, Kensington area; 78/650, accepting as complete construction contract for landscape construction of Danville Off-Street Parking District, Danville area. Established county policy with respect to reserve for self-insurance of public liability and workers' compensation risks. UK,29 June 27, 1978 Summary, continued Page 6 Authorized Public Works Director to: refund to C. Davis the cash surety deposit in connection with Sub. MS 64-74, Walnut Creek area; execute 2nd Amendment to Consulting Services Agreement with DeLeuw, Cather and Co. in connection with Waterfront Road Overhead and Approaches, Martinez area; execute Deferred Improvement Agreement with Robert F. Mygrant, et al, in connection with LUP 2001-75, Byron area; execute 1st Amendment to Agreement for Architectural Services with Hardison & Komatsu Associates for programming and master planning of the Court Facility Remodel, Administration Bldg. , Richmond; execute a contract amendment for the County to accept an additional grant from the State Solid Waste Management Board for a Conceptual Study of the U.S. Steel Resource Recovery Project and to execute a contract with Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers, for said purpose. Granted permission to the Holy Ghost Committee to partially close certain streets, Oakley area, for "Holy Ghost Procession" Parade and authorized the Public Works Director to request the State Department of Transportation to grant a partial closure of State Highway 4 for same. Declared intention to continue the following hearings from July 18 to times and dates indicated: Hearing on appeal of C. Grimm from Orinda Area Planning Commission's conditional approval of Variance Permit No. 1028-78, Orinda area to July 25 at 9:30 a.m. ; Hearing on appeal of R. Edwards from Orinda Area Planning Commission's conditional approval of MS 136-76 Orinda area to July 25 at 1:30 p.m. ; and Hearing on recommendation of Orinda Area Planning Commission on proposed Ordinance Code amendment providing for a slope density and Hillside Development Combining District for the Orinda area to Aug. 1 at 1:30 p.m. Referred back to Planning Commission for report hearing on proposed amendment to the County General Plan for the South Ygnacio Valley area. Approved Finance Committee's recommendation for implementation of the recommendations of the Retirement Board with respect to retirement contri- bution rates. Acknowledged receipt of memorandum from Director of Planning trans- mitting Resolution No. 49-1978 adopted by the County Planning Commission which certifies that the Draft EIR and response document for the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan were completed in accordance with CEQA and State and County guidelines and which suggests mitigation measures to lessen project impacts; hearing on plan is scheduled for July 25, 1978 at 9:30 a.m. Approved Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. P. Kenny) report establishing a Governmental Review Committee. r k The preceeding documents contain pages. k OFi7!277002 "EXECUTTY/E�SE55T01�! - _ --_ _ _�-V _..__._..__._.... _ , :.::; 5, YATfiERS- ►. Ofi/27/7S :0026 RS 78 35URGENCY,- .Si LARY ;MATTERS _ tUTIVE SESIOW �� 06127/79pRaORt7, #7th--47TURaENCY INTRODUC hyWAXVEb R�ADINC+ADOPTED SUPERVYSORS 511LARI�S Dfi"1 , 77t t)-0`28 -SUPFR•VTqO#S7 aALARifS �NCY�INTRODOCED=I AIV'ED--FtEAnxNG ADfi0TE6- �4 06/27/7A 0031 ORIS '378-42 - ADOPTFO ALAMO, - 2171--RZ � J 06/27/78 0031 ALAMO - 2171.--RZ ORD 47A-42 ADOPTED _ ____._-.-._.....___.. ...... . ._ _ -01672"T-/7FI . 0113a r___._..-P�'3Oi7S_ _._.._: ____...__ _..______.._..... ___-____-.....---..__......__ v� -i�RA n6/27/7A. .::0'633 HRA .- CIVIL. SFRV SHERIFF P--301)5, . ,, Ah/27/7100.31 APR A1)4 PROBATION » AUDITOR » HRA - CA » HEALTH .-..A0 7TOR`-w_H .A_ HEALTH---------------- I 06/2.7/7A no63 APR AnJ, RETHEL ISLAND FIRE/TASGAJARA FIRE/CROCKkTT-CAtt011TNF2 ,w n6127/7R On63 RFTHEL iSI.AND ETRE/TASSA.)�1RA FTRE/CROCKETT-CARGI)r1JE7_ APR ADJ ____ ___..._.._...._..__.-_.___.-RES:- 7A/fil9- THRU-#787625_ _.._._. __-____-__....-_.. ..... •; rI6/27/71 0066 RES 78/619 THRU 478/625 ASSESSMENTS • 06/27/71 On77 $t)R ,_280 -, SAN RAMON AREA -� APPRV MAP A AGRMT I4NACTO CRE K t1kVFLOPMF,NT CORP. .•- -FtES #7A/. 626- t' nt;17�fiA-�-t7t777 ____._ _.�Yr,NJtCi4-CREFIt DFVFLQPMF'NT-Ct3RP- -ttES: �7A1fi?.�; _--.___ . .._-._ - ._ . . .... SUQ ;9210__-:._-SAN;RAMOtJ_.AREIt --�`APPRV MAP_R AGRMT .......... 06/27/7A 01R3 Sl)R-_ ►959 ALAMO AREA • APPRV MAP R AGRMT IRCAL CORP RFS 1�78/627.- ta i 06/27/7A 0003 TRCAL CORP RFS 17A/C-27 SUB 49ri5 » ALAMO ARFA » APFIRV MAP A AGRMT ... ;._._.�o�srt�r�--oto . . R � -• � ._._...-........._ �F�:)�4TS:.OF��XP�NDYTIRt•S;.-w.�.RgS��sTA/628 ._ 06/27/78 00'AA 51)9-OR.IFCTS OF F.XPEND,TTt1RF5 » RFS 'STA/f�?R 13'b T FY 7Ati79 -, RES #7Et/628 • �'. 0�,/?7/.TA ,.. .O n6 FEES RFS _.. 1.: , . 4 _ . . . SURVEY MONUME'. T.0RESERVATION Ft1ND F'STARLTSH 1 nit?T1TR""0 '(t sF� _____-Sf1RVFY_ MONt1ME'NT'PRESFftiVATTOt`1 Ft1N17 FSTnR� ?5H._.. FEFS-.,, -RES:•#7A/fi?9_... ._._.,�:_.....__..._-....... _ _............... _ -- --.. ........-_..... .. ..--_....-i 06/27/71 niOA ms. it►a.-76 -- ORTNPA ARFA APPRV MAW BRONSON J H -- RES »7A/f,30 ! io !' n6/27/7A ojnR RRONS0111 J H - RFS, M70/630MS 142_M76 ORTNnA AREA - APPRV MAP ;FA"YF_TTEREAL ; A•PTRV_MAP_.A .-.AARMT ._._......... _ .. ROLOFF CHARLES- . 06/27/78: . .01,nq ROLOFF CHARLES JON » RFS. 37A/631 MS._ 121-77+ LAFAY TTE AR'EA - ;APPRV MAP A AGRMT n `i 06/27/7A '' 0116 MS-56-76 - � , BYR N AREA, - APPRV. MAP RTCHART, 6�. NOOLYN.-, RES IJ78/632,.r 1 _ ifF72'7`/7R_"17 '1.� __..._RTCHtIRT. i _.....___.�._ ____ . . :-._ _... . __.. . , MS' S�=�7R _AYRON_ARFA: 06/27/7A 0117 MS 146-77. " RRENiwoon, ARFA + APPRV MAP VAQUERO FARMS J14C RES 978/633 76 n6/P7/7R 0117 VAMIJERO FARMS INC - RFS 17A/633 MS 1A6-77. -- BRENTWOOD AREA - APPRV MAN • 06?2T/7R""T3 t "W.3' .0 4'...»R7fCHE�C1;"ARFAi -:fiPPR"J' MAP" - -_ - _ _,_.-......._._..__..._.__..-... . . -PORTER n6/27/7A 0.11,1 PORTFR RAYMONt7„» RFS 17fl/03q MS 35-7R .. PACHECO AREA ^ APPRV MAR 39 06/27179: . n 1„19 nR T.NUA OPEN SPACF ROUNDARY REORG - FTX TMG HEAR INC FAMUD TIT).-......_...._.__F'RMtln -R r� j7A�f;3F;- - __ _._._._...-- _. _._ _4- F _ ORTIJDA OPEIJ;-SPACF_' AOt)NDARY "Ri'ORA ; FTXING HFARTtJc�" n6/27/7R A119 ORTNDA OPFN, SPACF ROt1NnARY REGRA FTXlhlr HEARING CSA R-6 - RFS 'M/636 _ • ' n6/?7/7A 0119 CSA P+6 -s, RFS 17f1/636 • s ORINOA OPEN, SPACE ROtimARY Rtom FIXrtdG HEARING 0•F/"?77'7R”-`0'1'rq , ORTNDA'--OPEN;SPACE...RII1�1NffnRY-�ECfRf� +'...FTXl'Nr HFARTi;1G_._.._.-....._.... - CSA_:-.P=�k:-�; RES -n7�1�fi:3Fi _.___..-._____._-_._.._.__..._._.._..-.__..._....._..--._-__..___-,.__:_._.. _. _.._...-_-..-.___--_.._- +A4....Fp O• _.�_RFS._--.t�R/,fi31 , , ORIN)A OPEN SPACE.. BOUNDARY FE)fG FIXA- 2I- iNAHk NA06/27/71 0119 CSA P ft ()6/?7/79 01q 0 T nA OPFN SPPOE sot1h)DARY R'ORG FIXTNC HEARING MORA3A FP. - RES, '� A636 -._......_...- ORI NDA-..OPEJ _SPACE ,ROtNDARY- zEORG-�. FiXirr.NEAztrJr . n6/P7/'T8 011.4 ORTMr)A OPFN SP� .F BOUNDARY ROPG -- FiXrNr, .. ..........._.._. - s HEARING, ORTNDA FPD RFS, i17A/636 i O6/27/7A 0119 ORTNMA FPD RFS 17A/636 ORTNDA OPEN- SPACE Rt)IINDARY REOt:rf; + FTX'ING HFAt<'ftlA OPEN:'SP-ACF_-ROtJt4DARY-ItFO(f19--4--FI-XI-Nr,''NEARTNC CO.WRAL -CO--CO- RAN TTARY--015TRICIT -- 49-_1178/63 06/27/78 0119 CENTRAL CO CO SANITARY DISTRICT + RES 47A/636 ORTNDA OPE111 SPACE ROUhIDARY• REOf�r FIXTNG H<:ARV-IG, 06/27/7A n119 ORTNDA, OPEN SPACF BOUNDARY RFORG » FIXTNG N1=ARTNG WEST CO CO HOSPITAL DISTkICT - RES 478/636 ; RR/27/7R'__.._nl..t.�___�...__►vEST_rO CA NGSPTTAL f1TSTRTCT RFS_ 17A1F,3F; ORT nA...0PE G.N -SPACF”ROUND-ARY--PFOr,- --- -FTXTrIr -H�ARTt1G 1J 06/27/78 01-39 ROUNMARY CHANGF-+A1VFX d7A- 6,APRvn W/Ot)T HRG OR FL-FCT CSA L-•4?- - RES #7A/637 n6/27/7A 0139 GSA L,42 RFS .�t7R/Fi37 ! t.�. - -- = .- '' .. ROt11JQAr'IY CHANGE-At tI IEX ;.171-E�--APW/Ol1T HFtG OU FL-L.CT ...... --.-----! t16/2.7/7R n142 FMPL-OYFFS CONTRACT » COST OF LIVING, 114CRFFAaES s, 06/27/78 0143 MS 5'78 MARTt NF_? ARFA -. APPRV MAP. PRO-LAND .nFv1=,LOPME_NT. CO -- RES .478/639 Igo n /27'/'tA-�O»3 -- PaOyl:l1ND-nFVFt=:OPMCr�1T_CCT RES - 78/f�'i4- ____..__._.-......___.._._._.__.__-._.--. ...... .-.. ..-.MS 578 I�tARTtNEZ_..aRF.A__. APt�RV iv1f�P_._._.._..................._____... ..-........._._-_—__ 06/27/7A 0152 M5 239-77. b 8RENYwoon, ARFA -- APPRV MAP CLANCFY MTCHAF� W - RES !178/640 06/?7/79 0JR2 CLANCEY-,MTCHAEL W - RFS. 478/640 MS 23977 - BRENTWPQD AREA.- APPRV MAP SAN-'RAMQIV-ARFAt _---;--TMPRVMTS--CMPLTD__-_._--.-----_.._...---..... ........ . ....... BEAVER -JaMFS; M -«. RES--f178-/641 O6/77/7A. A.1S3 LFA.VER .JAMES, M •, RF.,,. 4,7f%/64 'SUB 4631 SAN..RAMONARE:A; IMPRVMTS CMPLTD 06/2.7/71 . 01�i3 BETA CT + SAN, Rl1 OP)'. ARFA. ROAD D a ACCEPTt;' rtr5 �i78/t�k1 s M �A ,. ei 72T'/7FBETA-�Ct--- S-A.tJ-`R CM04-AR • 06/27/78 0153 OMEGA RD SAN RAMON AREA ROAD CO -� ACCEPTED -• RES #7A/Fi41.;. '... - .. 4 . : O6/P7/7A 0153 ROAD CO ACCEPTED REP, 478/641 OMEGA RD - SAN RAMON AREA r----- r/:7778—A`_53 eME6A-Rn=ShN-R;nM9hI-1 - - -- . -- R0A0-C0------ &EPT ©----RES._..-#7-9/64-1- --..........._._._.. . ... 06/27/?F3 O•i.53 ROAD CO -� ACCEPTFD RES .i#711 641. OMEGA RD SAN RAMON AREA ,.; , ,. 06/-7/7A 0153 STAN RAMOI�i. VLY F3LVD..: " '" I tJIh1G.. .,;-_SAN RAMON AREA ROAf'f. CO. - ACCEPTED - RLS, 47E3/b41I , :9 ..._r. .. ...... M TA--01.``i3-- RO D-Ctrs-.A, bEP r7-`�."RF5 7�'64t----'_-`- __.__ _. . .. --SAN RAMON:-V Y-BLVD `WTt7ENTNG SAtJ RAMOtJ AIZFA 06/2_7/7A n154 Pr..ANNtt�IG RES 478/64.0- FEES -- CHANGE O6/?7/78 0154 FFES. -_CHANGFI7 PI_ANN114S -- RES t178/642 _ r - PRO- � 1178/643 ----fly/P ----ni -•FtOPO-C©NTRpL-76,-76, -:3E rM r1n- To�`l�rnmT n- RIAN _...__..- PTNE�t� .iN�o-cREFK-=CORPS. �E-E JQ J ,� ;(3ES 06/27/78 � n rife PINE/G L:I, D0. CRFFK • - COR: S QF• G PROJ RES , t37A/6!+3 FLOOD ,CONTROL ZONE .38. AMEND 6 TO ADOPTED PLAN •j _ _ N, FN., r , n�/?7/78 ni,61 STORM bITNGE r75T y FON 29A-+0.kl' AREii y DISSOLUTION CCC FLOOD ,CONTRO!_ - FTS 47A/64! is L .. _._.. - L n rdNTR01-.;-RES7 /i;4 -:1------ :____._::_�.__...-:_._.___...__...._...__STORM;t7RNE-nST 70rJ� 29A�OAKCEY ARrA; ntS�.OLt tT?ntJ I •I n6/27/7A n162 CC._ STORM• DRNGt..DST Z014E 29A ACCPTA CONVFYNCE PRPTY CCC . FLOOD CONTROL .- RES s37R/645_- OAKLEY 6 RF A. • 06/27/7A nt62 CCC FLOOD CONTROL RFS, t37A/645 •e OAKEEY AREA CC STORM DRNGE DST ?_ONE 29A, ACCPTA CONVFYtJCF PR TY r. O M7Y7R-'R 3`-- Si1E3-4 hLOA SAV: K,.A ARE �;:C1 FP D Rt=.S 'tt?A7F4 ____�.-___ _---?MPERi�IL�'SI�V NGSv F ' N- IMPERIAL SAS?NGS._,A LOA •,AS. 00 SUF3 . Firifi 5 N RAMON AW �- .CMPLTD - RF_S 47A/646 :� .6/27/78 0163 RENA6A. PEACE .+ SAN. RAkipV:.,AREA. �,.,ACCEPTFD AS C6 RD SUB„ �ifi56„-!.,.SAN R�1MON-_AREA;..--, CMP TD_-..RES t178/64t5 n /2'IY?A�'Rixi-__ ____StiH�ktS�"».S�1N-FT1tMOnI�XRF b.CIPLTn _�RES- _..._ .... RENAnA_PL/�CE SAN- RAMO -aRE1 -ACCEPT n A!; Co Rt) •1 06/2_7I7A 0163 FIQLTVAI2 . PI_ACF -� SAN RAMON ARE/a ..+ . ACCEPTF'_'D AS CO Rn SUR 4f,FF)6 SAN, RAMON .AREA '. CMPLTD.. -�, ITS tl7A/6f h n6/P7/ IA nj.63 SUR, 46FVI SAN RAMON AREA -- .CMPI-Tn-», RES 1713/1646 BOLIVAR PLACE - .SAN RAMON AREA ACCI_PT _D AS co 2 � 06-/?7'l?ti'-'n1F3 - RROtFS'-PLACE-` S`AN-tt7xtw01V---ARF CEPTf=D-AS__t0_-_RD------ -. SUB'4fiSf�':�:-- N-_KAMON tREn- CMPLTtT_ RFS tJ7t3/446 n6/27/7A 0163 SUR 4656 SAN: RAMON ARFA - CMI?L TD - RES. 478/64.6 tRPOLFs.. PLACE N,SAN RAMON AREA » ACCFPTFM AS CO Rh • Ofi/27/78 0 .64 S�tJR 4f119 � SAM .RAMON ARFA - CMPLTD » RES 17A/647 AWRIE:..I�ONAL[? .FT.. AL j 7fTA_-M:k4 .... -----LAIdR;Tt�"-t7ORJAL-i'?;FT :ht_:._�----- ---__ -___--- ” --- -- _-. ... - _....-- - ._ .. ._ SUB-..4A14 S.AN..._RAMOhI_._AREA• - CMPLTD RF5-079/647 . ... . .... .. .......I n6/27/78 07 64 STI-VFR.-CHTFF WAY. ACCPTA AS CO RD S08 4A19 -� SAN RAMON- AREA - CMPLTD - RES H7A/647 � n6/27/7A n164 SUB 4AIQ - SAN RAMON AREA. CMPLTD -• RF5_ tt7A/647 SILVER ,CHIEF WAY » ACC* AS -CO -Rn,. ;otkrs.--_.----__--__--ROAb-'t MPROVPMENTS:AtaMT-----COMP; ET-fi9N---RF-S-478)064A--.-_-.._-..._.......____..._..FL::nOitAt'IC� -0R'-„,--�$AN--RAMON---•• -.ACCPTD: CO Rt); 06/27/78 . ni65 FL. DORAtaO...nR -+. SAN RAMON - 'ACCPTD CO RD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AQMT - COMPLETION RES M7A/64R • } n6/27/78 (3160 FRANCiSCgN WAY CULVERT-•KFNSIt•irTOt`1 AREA-+CNTRCT CMPLTD $MTTI�,_WTL,t Iq A - RFS,08/649 3 _ ^�_._._...__----_.... ..-. .__._..._...-_. ........... .. __.FRANCISCAN'-WAYCI)LVRRT�KEtJSI1Vl�TOtJ ARFAiCNTr7CT`•t`,MPt:Tt)... . ---. ...” •� n6/27/78 nl.67 nANVTLLE..OFF_.ST. PARKING DST y, 611 RCT CMIV�Tn RAL.CO LANDSCAPTNA - LANDSCAPE COtJST 14 c; it7t3/650 76 06/27/78 0167 KA . --CO L.AIJDSCAPmr, - LANDSCAPE: CONST RFS ��7A/FiciO pAFJVTLLF' oFj'_ST PARKT146 DST CN'YkCT CMPLTD _._ nF/27r78 -Orl-A-A--" RFTIRFMF'NT-_.:Cp19TRTRCri TDhT RATF�`_-_____ _______ .___ ._ _. _ EMPLOYFrS_RFTIRFM>"NT,ASI%tJ • . n6/27/7R n hA FMPL_OYEt"S RFTtRT MIrNT ASrN RETIRF_-MF14T .CONTRIRUTION .RATES • 39 0A/27/7A n1A9 CC:C FPn _ ..,. . FAOAN 8 PARADISO CM46TRIICTION C0 - AWARD CN'I'ftG'fi i 1hl_a_:..PARArYT•56-r.GR5TRr1CTTQN ComA - WARD-,CNTR-CT' _. CC�,_..FPIi.......__.....;_._ . •i n6/27/7A OIAq FIRF 'TA dA » CONCORD A X14 --_MTZ - FUEL-_ TANK$ EAgAN 4 PARADISC. CONSTRIJCTION CO AWARD. ChJTJ2CT , � = OA/P7/78 78 n 1 Aq FAGAt l A PARAn TSO. C0h1STRUCT TON CO » AWARD CNTRC'i FIRE STAT X46 - C 4 - M 7 t l L .T NK. ! u CONCORD. A. hi T _ E A S lrrF/aTl7�n �___ _-_-cOM�1FND-ATTph7 �:_�ERT7FTCgTE-�"`. __...;_.^.....---.---.----..__....CONTRA -COSTA DE�;JTAI:;.SOrIETY - 'VOL(JNTFR'RS COMh�FWDEi) n6/27/7A 01q') CP14TRA COSTA nFNTAL, ,SOCIETY ». VOLtJNTEF RS COMhi 146-66 COMMENDATION, ,- CERTTF KATE OF. � n • nb/?7/713 0200 A P " `'. ' HEALTH CART MENTAL HE..LTH SERVICES 0. ROI,IRKF_, P IJL M RR'POf2T 6 WORKSHOP SE! ' ION O" ROfIRKF P"AItC...-MD ,�...RFPORR [�F:K' R SF`:.;TON.. ... ..........-._... . ........ ..... .. HEALTH CARE.AV -MENTAL,'_HEALTH SFRVICF'S ... Y nA/27/7A 0203 FI7WARDS RORF.RT - MS X36»76 - NOT OF TNT TO CONT ORINnA -- DWARDS PORFRT ' A 4! • n6/27/78 0203 ORTNPA.. -- EDWARDS RORFRT EDWARDS PQREP T M5 136-76 -- IJOT OF INT 0 C()IA.' • 29-713-.�_.-_TNTErIT-..TO..Cnt<JT HEART NG ' OR?1JnA :• GRIMM CLAYTO14 , 06/P7/7A n204 ORINDA - GRIMM CLAYTQN GRY.MM .CLAYTON - VP 1n29--7A - INTENT TO CONT HEARItIrs • • n6/P7/78 n205 SLOPF DENSITY A HILLSIDE tLOPMENT COMBINING DTST QRTNDA '-' F07--ORTNDA ...._.........__._.._:._._.. ';-- �..__ -- -- ._-.. . - SLnPEEtJSITY..-0- HTL: -.STDE 'DEVFLOPMFIJT COMAT11THS DIST... .... .. OA/27/78 n2O6 GOVFRNMFI ITAL RFVTFW . CT<e APPROVEn CHARGgS - INSTRUCTIONS - TO � S4 06/P7/7A n2m, APPROVED CHARGES -- TNSTRUCTIONS -- TO GOVERNMENTAL- REVIEW, CTE --- nh /DANVT�L.-E.-- _THOMAS'-.KFNtJETW -A PATRICI,A s • ` 06/27/78 0207 nANVTLL.E - THOMAS KENNETH 4. PATRICIA DANVILLE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASN - LIJP 2040»7A - HRR � n6/?7/7A 0209 RUCHANAN• ,F IFLn;,.A r F?OF2T .'° RIYPT- ACKNOWL 't7GFD MASTER .PLAN, DRAFT. FIR RESPOh1E�E DOCtlMFtJT _._... .. MASTER-PLIiN DR�CFT-ETR_A7__RESPMlrF-_DO•CUMFI4T - _-..___--_--._..._._.. ---- -..__ _..-131:JCHA1JAt:J_-FTELD^AIRPOPT--- RFPT ACKtJOWLEnGt-'I) . 06/27/78 0210 HARCPUPT ..J, MTCHAEL •-e CONTRACT APPROVE'! STATE PAYMENT COUtJTYS_AB-3121 CLAIM 'a so i 06/27/7A 021 STATE, PAYMFNT COUNTYS AR--3121 CLAIM HARCOURT .J_MICHAEL CONTRACT API�ROVED n67a7/7A--r12�-;,-- [r'PROPFRTY�nTt�S�CE" --- - ..:..;_... 06/27/7A 0P. 2_ CITY, QF..RTCHMOND; . TAX ,D.FnCa PROPERTY - AI.1TH SALE ss OFi/.7/7A. 0712 t?J30f ERTY •:-- TAX DFf:nt?I� -�. AUTH . SALE CITY .OF RICHMONQ, K X Q-T-Y;OF -RTCr4M0Nr __.- ---------.. -PROP ERTYJ�TAX—D�'F�:19�fl q�JTR SALE— , 0216. RFCREATION .& N 06/?7/713 ATURAL RESOURCES COMM-+AnVisTNG OF ROLE. PROP 13 • �. - 1 a { ' ECRE T & IdATUR L RFSOt1f.0 S .COMtA-�AnVTSTtgG OF= k0LE 1 06/27/78 0216 PROP, 13 _ R A_ ION A _ Obi/27f7A -021TJ _ ____EL CFRR"TIO"y-cT.TY-OF_—"REAUL--OCATTCSN-"-OF-CONTFIGY-FGNf3S-___.___--._-GCMMONTT Y-REVEL 0P!MFNT-.8C0CK :GRAN"f_____._.----_ • 06/27/7A 02_18 COMMUNTTY DF'V�"LOPMFIJT RLQC,K GRUNT r-L &RJ�ITO CITY OF REALLOCATION OF C0HTHGY i l)HI)S 8 N POLO CITY OF RFAL!_OCATTON OF CNTHGY FUtJF1S COMMI NTTY f)E � 06/27/78 OP1 SA CK�r( SAN �--!:TTYPO . � k3FALIC . CATTT _ I'('Y OF: -REALt OC ATTOiJ t+__ CtJTt 1GY I't Jt1t);,, OA/: 7/78 0220 CCC SAN HIST S ORD 42 - URGENCY � EXTENDED TO JULY 31 197A ' - 9 - CCC :SA�J DIST 45 OF,/27/78 0?2.0 ORD_ '12 -x URGENCY F"XTFNbC"l) TO �JULY 31 1978 C AGLF.SICNAIv; „Cc NTk7A T OMPII'i'f=R-_ A-TDEI)--t)ISPATCN.SYSTEM_,_._._ _06/,17/7R 0?_22 COMPUTER AT�Ef) niSPATCH SYRTFNI EAGLE SIGNAL. -CORP - CONTRACT APPRVD OP,/P7/7A OA07 WFCARF• SOCIFTY TNC , � CONTRACT AMENDMFNT APPRVD DAY_TRFATMtNT_CENTER 0- -TO-MA PERATIONS - TO MATiJTATLJ s _.___._.0Ff27I7R -0Ff17___.-_�_-I�"t1Y-TRF7il MFiJi "C F�ITF'R--OP t 1CT tI3iJ5_ _T O-MATNTATNfi - _ WlE--CARF _SOCTFTY- INC -_CONTP,ACTAMF_HDtllFI`,IT APPRVD i OF,/?7/7A OA11 TNSURAHCE - ;ELF Ot: PURLTC LIARTI.TTY WORKERS COMP 06/2.7/7A 0611 WORKFR'; COMP INSI)RANCF SELF OF PUBLIC LTA13TLTTY - -_ _ .�HTfi,=+-ACITF�DRT7_Et�CERT--OF ARPRE`CHEACTH:DEP'I *__w_._+__.__ 06/2.7/7A 061,3 HEALT' H nE' PT � ' DOT SHIG AU?HORIZ�D CENT OF APPR* C �! 06/?7/78 OF,14 tr C RF k;;FL EY-ROALT HALL -� AGRMT APPROVED WORK STUDY STUfJENTS FOR PUBLIC ,f�LFFrJ[)f"R f27f7R- _tTF1 - -WORiz S'fE"!i'lY- TCII}FNTS_FSR-._PIlRCTC i7FFENCSER__.__. ____ t!_._C__BFRK `�F'Y-ROALT NAC.I At'RMT APPROVED 06/27/78 0614 HASTINGS COLI-EGF OF THE LAW. WORK -STUDY STUDFNTS FOR PUBLIC 0EFt=`tJL)FR 2; 06/27/7A 06.1-4 WORK STUDY ST1 It' 17NTS FOR PURL T C DEl=ENt)FR HASTINGS NGS COLL_EGF OF THE LAWW(}RK- - - -- STUDY STUDENTS FOR..PLIBL2C _C�EF€'NDFR i 06/2'7/'78 06114 WOR!' STIJDY STUDFNTS FOR PURLTC DEFENDER U. C DAMS 06/27/7A 0614 Mc Ga ORAE SCH'WL OF LAW1. _-_ . _ _ WORK. STII Y , �,TUnENTS FOR PURL ?C [7EFENnF"R ')RK._STCIt7`i'_ STt7nENTS F`(3R PItRLtC"DFFFNDFR - - _ WORK. S"Rk IDY. STOnE!A-F(; FOR PIJBL It; DFF tJI)F'R 06f?7/78 OE,14 GOLt7K`t�J_GhTE flNiVFRSITY . OA/27/78 0614 WORK STUDY STtJn_ NTS FOR PURLTC DF-FcNn17R GOLDFI`), GATE UHTVERS iTY OA/27/7A 0633 SALARXFS , . FXECUTT,,VE SE5SlXON r, 06/27/78 0634 GENW.RAL PLAN - AMFHD -, HRG SOUTH YGNACIO VALt-EY AREA ---HRG ,YCNACI(7 06/27/78 063f, SCHOOL CROS`.' TNG GUARD SERV FUND IVIG FTNAI XE CTS - RC€ hiti;I=t7 TO 0f,/?7178 OF�3F, FTNAtICE CTF -- REF !'I�.,rD _TO SCHOOL CROS':,TtlG GUARD SERV FHHDIIIG tV2CF�ARFA F'tJN£}-TNG_-- _ .._._.. - F:INA#CE. CTF -� RF"I=E F!"E.l) ;T'0 ... - 06/27/7A 0631 FINANCE CTF .-= , REPFRkF'D TO RECRFATTOkJAI SERVICE ARBA Ft!! . 11wt31 GARTHA M 7 DBA, KEN-�B"WAY . " AGRMT APRVD EMFRGENCY RESTDENTTAL CARF: PLACEMENT � v 06/2?/?8 OF�41 RLANCHARt) - _. FM' RGENCY-�RFSTC)�' ITTAL;--CARE--PL/CFM!-t<17-_ __----.-- RLANCHARI7 _CAPTH- &-M - l�qA KbN-R--E•IAY - AGRMT APRVD S r WORSHAM GARY A - REfvPPOTNTMF_Ill ` OA/?7/78 0642 C'C' FMPLOYEF RI�TTRFMFNT ROARD O6/27/78 Of,42 WORSHAM GARY A - , RF PPOTNTMFHT CCI, EMPLOYEE'S RC'TIRF'MI-:NT BOARD COL ARTCH MA RCFLL1 8 Rf APPOT tJTk+fENT OA/27/7R 0642 COLAR ICH MARCFLLA R, --. RFAPPOINTMENT CC{' FMPL OYEt"S _RFTIF I hot NT BOARD . 06/27/78 OF,42 Crc FMPLOYFI~S R, TTRt=MrNT BOARD ;PONFtlRFRr7N, RICHATtl}, K. RE:APPOINTM1=tl T OE,/2777A__0"A� 2 __.___. .-_.SP01lEl;lak"RfH R7CFkAtTD- i ^� J?FAPPC�TNTMEIIT C{"'" EkhPL 0YC4'S RETTR(=t�lC"NT fTOA4�f} 06/?7/7A OF,43 ni`VCLOPM' NT,AL nTSARTI_'rTf�S AREA ROARD V ;MTTH FRANCES - Rt"�,TGNATTOW � y 06/27/7A O643 1;IATTH FRANCES RFCTCtlATI01t CJFVt?�OPMFHTAL DISARTLTT'I.E!', APf7-A AOAI:n V _ 06/27/76 .- __ _ ` ,y IRR CHTt?CT. . W i)Fi44 OLTVFR nk ST!_VA Tt�kC AWARD < tlTRCI r tRLACKHAItJK RD OVERLAY;P(?OJ tAtdVILI.F At{C'r� OF�:/27f7FT"---0rti44__ ___ __--RLACKHAW RI7_..OVERL;AY-PROJ._ . _(77`iNV71_L=E.�ARFI�.._._ . OLI 1ER OF SILVA TtJC �' I� ' . :` OF,/27/76 0645 STATF ll} _eT OF _HF'ALTH -* PLAN AP.�ROVED ;UBMI.,._, fON IM�1LJl4IZATTOt4_ TtI7.TtA`! AVE PLAID _ f1F,f?7/78rt-" -C3F>4�"i '---'-... _-._Tt,�f.lCit,l77_AT;IOM: Tt�I,TTATTVF-PLAt•I__ __ _._.____ _.-_--- ._ . .. _- __ STAT' DEPT_017- HEALTH- � Pt�AtJ 1�P4'Rf}VED 5tlI3MT 7rTOtl r 06/27/78 0662 CLAIM - nFNIFD HAMi/!ER OPAL. , 0 J 0 06/27/78 066P, HAMMFR OPAL CLAIM -DGNTfn s, _. ..__.. RGUTS N - -- - - _-Of�/2?/"7A_-_bfsA4-- _-_-_Ci:_AIM^.• -flEt`JIFI�_----_____.___.__ ____._---__-_ OA/27/7A 0664 GUTRGUfS rUTRGUTS N - CLAIM- - OENTFD � 06/27/78 0609 CLAIM_- OFNIFD BOSr? CAROL A1,11.1 & LIi_i-IALJ CLAIM_;-_.i)EN-I'Ef1 -- - n 06/27/78 0673 CLAIMS - DFNTF0 MARTINF7 GI'ORG17 j 06/27/78 0673 MARTINEZ GEORGI^ CLAIMS - DENT 1) p - ---.__---O�i/27/?8__.0676-- - CLA-IM -«- DENIF'n-_ _.___._.____._._____. _ ____�___.._--.___________---__-_-- _.______--��DI2THAM -JAMES � ' 06/27/78 0676 WORTHAM JAMES CLAIM -� Q NIED 6, 06/2'7/7A 067A' CLAIM �+ DFNTFD .. VARGAS LOLL JkRF'Y liRG7CS�LC}l�ti�"; 06/27/78 0681 CLA IM ti DENIED HUGHES £� RIG!WRbtON4 s 740 06/27/7A 0681 HUGHES A RTCHARDSON CLAIM - DENIED tVG-MfL 18ERS-,TP----,----____ ._...__.____ 0 ' 06/27/78 0686 INCREASINGMFMBFRSHIP CCC: ADVISORY, COUNCION_:AGiNG . lo 06/27/7A 01687 CCG , DRUG '480SE BOARD HOGSTROM ROSEANHE -- REAPPOINTMENT 06/P7/7A _O69F3 G!-�FRTROKROSFAN�LEVITE__:.:.-_REAPPdIPtffiMEi3'f'_—"_____. . .. CCA; bRUG--"ABUSE- BOARD, SON V CORY. 11 06/27/7Fi 06AA O,kSON V. CPRY, CHERNTCK & LEVT'T - -�OF;t27t7A-�ahf3� ---LiMGAi -17FEFNSE`-PROV-Tl -I-ON r 06/27/78 0689 RAMS1 Y_HARr:Y D LEGAL DEFENSE PROVISION 06/27/7A 0690 CONSFNIT TO , DFDTCATTON y ROADWAY PURPOSES - nCCEPTEf3 PAC SEL t, TEL COMS 222-76 JO DEDICATION -• ROADWAY Pt)RPOc;E a .,, ACC1iTPTf-D 06/2'7/7;1 06QO CONSENT TO DFr)TCATION - ROADWAY PI)RPOSE�, -* ACCEPTED F R MUNTCTPAL HTTLITY LIST SHR 5165 06/27/78 069n F R MUNTCTPAL UTTLTTY DST St)R 5165 CONSFIAT TO DEDIC'ATI01l -- ROADWAY PUPPOSE'{-, -^ ACCEPTED 06/27/78 0690 MYGRANT ROBERT F -�_LUP 2t10�1�75 GRANT qL D ACCEPTED 06/27/79 DA9i MS h4 ' 74 -. WALh1t)T CR��K AREA � REL kASE DEPOSIT DAVIS GLIFI ORD �l -� R&OND nEPOSTT 2_.___. __._-SAV�S `C Tt~Ft3RD_R__.y_._REFt)ht1 f�FPOSTT - ____ .___-_- - ___.. _ M5_ f�4�74 - WALhJt1T CREI"K At EA rtELFASF' DFPdsTT t16/27/79 0602 FIJTFRPRTS� FoOp -• TMPLEME-WTAT10H MF#9TCAL SFRVTC1=S CIF,/27J'TA 0672 MEDTC'AL SERVICES EI�ITrr'�Pf�TSC FUND -- TMPLEMI=tJTATidl1 F'RPR? gUnGET -__F_ST-: INITIAL AL PROC:ED(JRF5 ; r 06/27/7A 0694 F3tIDGET - _EST_ TNTTLAL PROCFD�IRES ENf�' PRISE FUND MEDICAL SERVICES 06/27/78 0696 ENTFRPFTSF FUNp , - ESTARLI SHF't7 EC)iCAL 5F RVTCFS O6J2777A OF;9F, . . __ _ M MFDTCAI? SFRVTCFS__ _ .__ __-_ _._____. _. ..._. FNTERPC7Si= FUi�p ftiSTARLTSNED_ //6/27176 0687 TRAFFT_C RE'S 12451 STOP ARLINGTON ROUt_EVARO - RICHMOND AREA D OE,/27/78 0697 AR -INrTON, ROt)LEVARD RTCHMOND AREA TRAFFTC RES, t12451 - STOP _ - Oh/27/79_.._.-.0697___.__.._-_...TRAF '2 C, RF!;"'-ti?-4gl ^ _STOP- ___ _ ___.___ _ _. MC PIRYDE AVF'NtfE _ RICHMOND- AREA _. . 06/27/7A 0697 MC. RRYME AVENUE RICHMOND AREA TRAFE*IC, RES, 42451 -STOP _ 06/?7/78 069A TRAFt'TC, RFS, 42450 SPC) MC" BRYDE. AVENUE -- RTCHMOWD AREA -__-OS/27J7A- __.0698__ .___.__-__MC._RRYDE AVF:Nt7F_4 RTCHMOttin -11RFA--- _____ ___ _ TRAFFTC RES 12450 - SPD 06/27/78 06()9 FCONOMTC OPPORTMITTY COt1NCTL WOOD ORLY14 RlEAPf)0TH1MFt,JT j F'OIPfTMt=`IST ECOi',iQMTC OPPORTUNITY GOtll��}CI�. 06/27/78 069 ) 400D t*)RLYH RE P - P ` I,_RORF', T pORPIt;:T t:1-R08EE�T .» RFAPPOINTMENT 06/27/7A af,99 J�IRNLTI R - f�E'APROTNTMF*HT ECONOMIC, OPPORTUNITY COt)HM- 06/2.7/7A 0641 EC0N0MTC, OPPORTHllTTY COHHCTL VAN MARTER CLAUDE!, - RLAPPOINTME-t IT „ 1' 06/77/78_- ..06�<) _ TVItN j�AR"I f F:"-CLAU17(w -._PF`11P aD Tt1TMF'n1T". FCONOM7C -OP,�C�RTI)hI.TTY. COUNCTL _ - nA/27J7A 070+ WASTE SOLID -b C.ONCEPTUFL )Ti jr)Y FOR t.# S .�TF FL.. Rf-SOURCE f rCOV�t'Y P(;OJFCTfP G Pr F * r O6/27/7A 0700 U S �aTFFL RrSDURCE R, COVrPY P+�OJECT/R G A E WASTE - SOLID CONCI=.PTUEL STUDY FOR �;1=RV tf 5 ;TEi I~ R"`SOIMCF kFCOVrkY PldOJCCT/P G A_ F - 06/27/78 070th U S STEt=L RF"SOORC1= PF'COVF'RY PRO JECTtP G A E BROWN � CALQtY)I<L�. �* CNSLTTNG SEEN AGMAT APNt?Vt3 06/27/78 n70n ST �zOLIr) WASTP: MNGMT RD -» CNTRCT AMFND APt='RVD U S ,T.EEL RE5PURCE RIrCOVFftY Pt flJECT/I� G & E � ar t - - _ 0f�/2.7/7R C17R0" t-) S;, STENT_ RFSOUF CF' i� _OVF P '(7�1CCT/P G .4 C" ST SOLID WASTE MlIGMT RD CiITRCT AMF11n AP("Rvl n6/2.7/78 0712 MS , 177--7? . ALI,MO AREA PARK DMICATTON FPF WATVI=D n6/27/7A 0712 PARK OFMCATT01`1 FFl-' WA1VF"n MS 177-72 - ALA##O AREA _ 06127/78 ___ 0713 VAL_i.T lri['LI_IAM -� REMOV�FI3 _ 1 VTFW VA-LT WT1 ,IAM - REf�tOVC`D - 0;,/27/78 071.-3 h3FTG.HRORH0F,,D PRFSFRVATTON CTF _ MOUNTATi NETGHRORH��t;CS PRESMVATTOW CTF - MOI)ITFATtl VTFVJ s, 06/27/711 071.3 NE?T_GHRORHOOD PRFSEi?VATTON CTE * 'UTNE HTL_L V� LLI WTL,_ IA#=4 -, APPOTVITME11,t 0A/?7/78 0713 _ _ _ _ . vA�1:�T �J1 L l.1AM_ r�PPOTFITM IIT tJF"TGHBORHO lf?. P tEScI_:VATT0H CTF - V111F HTL1._ n6/27/78 0714 FAMILY PRACTTCF CL TNTC RFMODFL_ HOSPTTAL --- RE_JFCT ALI__ SIDS OA/27/7A 07,1.4 HOSPITAL_ - REJFC-F ALI_ BIDS FAM.TLY PRACTICE CI_.TNTC RFMODFL 06/27/79__._.071-fi_ ._ _.-__ ORn 178/43_ READOPTED __ HEALTH DEPT 06/27/78 0715 HEALTH DEPT ORD 878/43 a READOPTED $, 06/27/78 071 A ORf? 47A/44 — R1=ADOPTED FEIFS 06/2_7/78_- (771 - F 'S__ .___ ORD {#7A/4is READOPTEi) n6/27/78 (1717 ORES d7A"45 -+ tIRGFNC.Y -. AnOPTFD HEALTH -- ORI? 178--47) URGENCY ADOPTED 6, 06/27/7A 0717 HF'ALTH - ORD 1178-+49 URGENCY ADOPTED ORD '17A--4.91 -7 URGE WN Y -- ADOPTEt) _- 06-/27/78----0720-- -------- A�1TT0CH"= CT'�Y 4F . .__CdtlTRttiCT APF�ROVFD ______-_---.- �,EIJIgR DPO'P TN CTR _ n6/27/79 0720 SFN,TOR DROP IN. CTR ANTIOCH �- CITY OF CONTRACIT APPROVED � b� n6/27/7R 0730 GF~NFRAL PLAN HFARTNG -+ WEST T PTTTSRURG WFST PIT';9L1RG, - GENFRAL PLAN HEARIIJG __---OF�/27/78" _0730.-_-.-___---_-WFST_ PITT;.RtJRC;___-:_CIE h15I AL- Pi.AN---HE-AIZ-TNG_.._.__.___-----___-.-_--. _ _ - GENERAL PLAIT HEADY' HG -% 4JFST "PTT'i"SRt)F2G � n6/?7/7iA 0137 COURT FACTLTTY REMODEL - ADMIN BLDG .- RICHMOND HARDISON & KOMATSI) AS,-)'OC - 1ST AMEND TO AGkMT APi4,Vf) z� a Oh/27/78 0737 HAROT' 5PN , R KOMATSU ASt�OC IST AMEND TO AGRMT APPRVD COURT FACTL [TY -RFMODEL, - ADMT14 nLOG -- RTCHMOW) OF,/ f ()741 _OOHARA /1VF ~ O/1Kl `f�ARF A RCA RC AVi "' ,A • OSLJRE APPRQVFD i• n6/P7/7A 0741 ROAD CLOSURF, APPRbv�r) HOME ST OAKL.E=Y ARTA _ OVFD, __.___ _ ._. . SF_"CON� ST OAKLEY ARF"A Of�%?717Fi---0741___.___. -- -HOME Sfi -"; -0-AkLF'Y AR .11 ____..._.-.._____�..._---.w__-._..-_ _..____ ___. __ ROAM CLOS!)RF PI ROVE[? __. . OF,/?7/78 0741 ROAD CLOSURE, APPR tz 06/27/7A 0741 SE=COI*!n ST -a, OAKLEY AREA ROAD CLOSURC'. A�?��ROVF{7 - - _ __.—__-THTRD ST--"- _OAKLkY _AREA.__..___. * 06/27/7A 0741 TSI T RD ST OAKL FY_ AREA ROAM CL_CSURE APPROVED • 15 n6/27/78 0742 NFTGHRORHn,.{D PRESERVATION CTE MT VTEW ALFORD EVELYN APPOINTED r)6/?7/7A ._._n742-_.._ ------IgEICHRORHr::1D--'PRESF"RVA -rioIJ:CTE -- MT VTFty i 06/?7/7A 0743 Ni`TGHRORHQ-'n PRFSF'I',VATTON_CTF VTNE HILI_ MC NAM(=R FRANK !_ APPOTNTED, • ae 06/27/7A 0743 MC NAMFR FRANK L -- APP(3fNTED, tJETGHRORHOOD ,.PRF'Sf=RVATTON. CTE -+ VTIJF' HTLL 06/?7/7A-_ 0T4-t ___-------SOS:T )-- 1=OFr`-SOL ID-WASTE-CONTROL- ACT. OF 19,76 06/?7/7A 0744 LRFRC--KAPTLOFF SOLID ,W� STF. CONTROL CT QF. 1976 SOLID WASTt' MGMT PRD --Af)OPTEC). .APPROVAL r47A-13 • 2a 06/?.7/7x3 0744 HEALTH r) PT - r)ES,TGNATFp LOCAL. FNFORCEMFWT AGENCY WASTE MGII'f ENFORCEME HT AGFNCY 0h f27/78- -- -._.__-HEALTH-!)EPT--,,DF(;IGNATF-D,- LOCA!- -rtiFORC["r4t�'rJT AGiI]CY 06/?7/7A 07U7 NFIGHRORHOOD PfRFSFQ\VATTOtJ CTE - MOHTALVTH MANOR RATNE SOHDRA !_ APPOINTE=D_ i n6/?7/7A 0747 RATNE' SONI7RA L -- AP4='OTNTFD NE,TGHBORHOi�D PRFSFRVATION CTE w MOIJTALVTIJ MAI101; - _____-----06-/27/-?A- ---0x'47- _- NFIGHRORHOt5D--PRFf;#�RVAT'I-ON---C-TE--MONTALLV-T�1- MANOR_-_------- _ RLES`-,._ RONALD-L- «,--APPOTNTFD_ , OFA/?7/78 0747 13L .1; RONAIh L - APPOINTEL) N�IGHBORHOOq PRE�SE'RVATIotJ CTS MONTALVIrJ MA►JO1� • f7 OA/?_7/7A 0748 NFTGHB6RHOOD PRFSERVATTON CTE= .4 RODFr0 PHTL.LITPS MAL. -- APPOINTED nF�/?7/7A n74FV PHTL:i_TPS MAL � _APF*' OTNTFr),---- --' --------- ---------------- -. . ----__ -- _ - -_-NfETGHROE- HO(,D PRESC�'VA'TTQt�I CTF RODEO O6/P7/7A 0740 tJ IGHRORHO eD PRF'Sr1 VATTON CTE NO RICHMOND HFRNAIJDEZ PAUL -- APR'OTttlTFD. • as n6/?7/7A 0749 HFNAriD1=7 PAUL_ y APPOTHT1=D NEIGHRORHO(-J) PRESS-(-'VATIOH C`I' 110 I�TCHMOHD _ - _- --n6/27/78_.__ 07u_0-__- _____NrlrH80RHOC'D--P FSiL-rVA-rTOt1;_CT -ti-I�10_RTCHMOIJD ___ _... .___ .________ ._____. REYC s DOMTTTLnA, = APPOTNTED 06/27/7A 0740 RFYE'S DOMTTILDA -- APPOTNTED NETGNF3ORHOOD PRESFRVATIOt,t CTE -- 110 RICHMOHD „ 06/27/78 0740 NFTCHRORHOL?I) PRESERVATION CTE ^� NO R[CHMOND PRTCF. ,DENHIS J -� APPOTOTED, - 31 , 06/27/78- _-0740._ --- -PRTCE C7E'N(IIS �J.._ APi�IOTIJTE[3___ __.__-�.-.. _..--------- _-___._.., _ .. _. .___.. _- NF GH90RHOOP PRE=SFt:VATTON CTEV -� 110 RICHMOIJn 06/2.7/78 0750 COUNTYWTDI= HOUSING fa COM111 DEV ADV CTE SUP DTST I f r LATDI_EY .JANE' 11 » APPOTHTFD 75 n6/27/7A n75n L.A * PLFY JANE 11 AP;�OTHTEr) COUNTYWfDE HOtJSTtJC� OMI-I [)-V AIV C"TE? -- I-,IJP DT1'T T r ' W�TFRFRO19T- Rj)--OVFRHFAn-_g-_AP�R0IkCMF`S-- MARTTNE7_-ARBA-- - D*F-LEUW CATHS-R_ & CO 2ND AMFHD-T0 AGRMT APPI VO 06/27/7A 0751 nF-LFt,JW CATHFR, A CO -- 2ND AMEND, TO AGRMT API`RVD WATT RFRONT PD OVERHEAD._ 9 ,AP4aR0ACHFS - MAilT IPJF 7 ArzFA � „ 06/?7/78 0753CITATTON RUILDFRS -. P-20O--RZ ,-7_HF'ARING SAN. RAMOfl THE ROMAN CATHOLIC BT-)HOP 01: GAKLAUD--01-iIJ nFa/27% s 7A--- n? 3 ._ SAN Fit+MON THFROMATl CATHDt--TC_-I3Tt;HOP"_OF-«AKLiatlD O-vgl�l- CTTATTON- RU`[LDl~RS_ .- 2''On-r,?- HFAPItJG 06/27/7A 0754 MS_5Fti-79 RYRON ARTA CNSEtIT TO DEDICATION WATVF'f) RTCHART GWENDOLYH • /2m/?7/71 0754 RT.C,HART GWF'NDOLYH MS 5Fz--7A -- BYROfi A(;EA -- CHSE;4T -10 DF"f)ICA,rTotJ t'1ATVFO O75'"> ;E'R11llALit�1I OF,f2717R FFtb1Rt�JTTt�RFDCOS�- ]FTTC�rt�'1FNT"-______.._------.____...________..____._ -----TRgVAL;TNT FURI;JZ`E'11E2F CO :INCa _ J NC CLAIM 7 RE C' OM CiJ1JPP,011TSE SFT'1'LFttt"I J'S ,s 06/27/78 0757 FN,T,FRPJ�TSE, .FUND POLTCTES/PLANS/PROCEDURES !;E TtJTERW-PAI -ME"I J T AL AGMif 00/27/78- ..0797 POkTCTES/I'L ANr/PRO rEDtJRFS- .;q-- TNTFRDEPAPTMFrJT-A[ AGMT --- - - .. _ ENTF'RPRISE' FOW.) 06/27/711 0800 THF, HOFMAl4ff COMPAIJY h SUR 5353 -- RYROH APPEAL , HEARTNG -- BYROH -- -;IJR 5353 06/27/7A 080() APPEAL HE".AR TNG RYROH -- SUF3 5353 THE' HOFMAI J1 J COMPAtlY -- SLJR 53F)3 — BYI'()t l 06/27/78_ 0A08 _RN IhJSTE [it1 -A---- MS -1126-77 -7 TAS' l�Jr�Rh__--- _ ___ __-_-- _ .-_.___- ___ --- - ARPiFAL.-HEARTNG « MS 226-77 - TAS- AJ%JCA i OO/27f 7A +OfInA APPFAL HF ARTNG MS 226--77 -w TASSAJARA RETNSTI'TN A - MS 226-77 -- T ASt AJARA i 06/?7/7m OA?5 E=L17.0NDO W _ J -s APPLICANT -- 2?13--R7 PARLEY ARTA - 2213--R7_ .- HEARTfIG ; 06/27/7A OA?5 OAKbFY ARTA :, 2213-R7 __-__HF HF* ------ _._ _.__ .__ - __ _ ELTZONDO -W J AP1=1_TCAIIT -- 2211-R7 • 06/27/78 0A34 RlIDGFT FY 77--M - MFHTAL HEALTH MENTAL HEALTH RUDGF:T APP 14 n6/27/7A 0814 MENTAL HFAL_TH FIUDGIFT APP RUDGET FY 77--78, MENTAL HEALTH - 06/27/78 0839 _____.-MS 7�1=-7F� M D V OPMEIJT RICF#TS .- _ - -__-....----- -----__-_.---- - __ -_____-SUTTON- T - -RF-0 Fc;T .THAT COUNTY RELItJ<. OV;H DO V RTGHT', • 06/27/78 0835 SUTTON T REW)FST THAT CO0HTY REL.TNQUISH DFV RIGHTS MS 79-76 - DEVFLOPMEIAT RTGHTS S, 06/27/78 OA36 ALEXANDER LTNIOSIIY_JR MUSE'LJM WTLf)-L-IFS RE-,CUE , PRPGRAM FUIJD FOR Pf,'OFaAGATION h COtIG OF t=TSH--i4fO E Cott Al.l_.CITMIJ4* - - n6/27/'TA- -nf33Fa _.__-__. Fi It�J17 FOR Pf?CIi�AGT�TTi'IJ_ _�._.Ct)t1S FTSH;-sRFW-FOR_ALI.-OTMNT _ AL,FYANDFR LTNlnSAY JR MIJSEI fM� NTLO l. TFC P1"SCI JiF PIJOGrW4 r Of)/P-7/78 OA37 LOS 4-i-)ANOS COM HOSPMRFQ FOP, PRF--) TTMF -- PROP 13 CLERK C,;FOU!:STFD TO AS, TGH TTMF ,• 0 06/27/7A OA37 CL FRK i,' MUF"ST'Fr) 1'0 AS`.IG1! TTM} . LOS MF-DAHOS COM ,H0SP--RIE0 FOP Pk; '4, TIf4'f7 ISI OP 13 - _-----.._06/27/78--.... OA4:0-_ _-_. _ - -RLACKHAWK -Rn-"-OVFf�L-AY------ _:17ANVTL's__F`_, _ ._.____._ '._._- -.-__ __ B ANAUGsH FXCAVATTNG-TNC -- f2ESCTS'..;ION OF COtJTi�ACT ! 06/27/76 OR40 RRAEJrat1GH E'XC TTNG TNC -r R1"SCTS_', ION OF CONTRACT BLACKHAWK . RD--OVFRLAY -- . )ANVILLE • 06/P7/78 Of�43 FTNAIJCF, C'TE=, R1=PORT_-- . APPROVED SPATE. t)EPT. OF E31~N FIT PAYMFRJ"FS I'OF-f3)rtJ -CTE'_ Rr-po ZT �_ Apr'ROVrD____...__.. 06/27/78 OA45i ;TATE O7 PT OF REENiFFTT PAYME=NTS APPLTCATTON APRVD SOCIAL SE?RVTCE '� } _ . __ . STATE DEPT, QF BENF1=IT PAYMEN`fS -� APPICA "ION APRtIC s Ofi/?_7/7A 085 SOCIAL SERVICE h42?r' A 4Afs?;-- ------�-COUNTY_SERV-I;"E---ARI~lk-R-- --�-CIT_.AFJV-C-i 1~-- _� __ ___.__ ..._.P{ -A6 CAR01`'ttd ! 06t27?7n 0863 POAGE CAROLYN -» APPOT,NTMFNT COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-9 CTT ADV CTS' lo 06/27/78 QA64 nFEn_ GRANT/RIGHT OF WAY - CNTRCT APPRVD CHURCH OF _.JESUS CHRIST OF LATTi R DAY SAINTS CHtiRCN_OFCHRiST'�Of= LATTER-D�1-`�- J�?N`t"c-_ ---__..__-_------.___. .___._D .F"n- rRANTlRT,GH " -OF 4+tAY___ CNTRC"1.__APPQVp-_._ 0! 06/?7/7A OR65 f COUNTY CMTY nF-TOXICATTON CTR CNTRCT AMEND APPRVD ALCOHOL. PROGRAM _ x 06/27/7A OR6F) ALCOHOi_ PROGRAM E COUNTY CMTY,_DETOXICATION CTR ., CNTRCT AMFHn API='I VD I 9j;'4RFTT T,A1C:,i CONTRACT-AMENOMENT-APPROVFD 06/2.7!79 OAhra ALCOHOL, PROGRAM _ _ 91--BETT TNC CONTRACT AMENDNI NT APPROVED 0 : 06/P7/7A 0885 NATIONAL COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL_TSM -� BAY AREA INC ALCOHOL PROGRAM, 06/P7/7P _. Orf Ati- AUCOHO APPROVED --F rnJnVt� FY 77178 - --- - -- . ._. - - _ ._A C01-IOLLPROGRAML- OtJ �1c CQHO�,TSM - BAr .AttiF�i 7I1t c 06/27/78 nA€5 ALCOHOL PROARAM RUDGFT APPROVFn. - FINAL FY 77/78 � DEPT_.__... -C1� 1t;K KuG1=I . DA 1 E-?=-EM PL�OY> 06/27/78 08AA cl:ucK_RoGF_p ,�JAL_E-.-�. f"MP1,.OYtr� CLAIM LOSS OF PERS014AL PRPTY"SHERIFF-CORONEPS 13FPfi 0 06/2.7/78 OA90 CONTRACT NEfOTTATTONS -- AUTHORT?_E LIRA i Dh/?7l78 _. ._nsgo- __-_...-_.HRA----------.__ ____ _._______ _____.___-___...._._ _._--_---.___ ._.__ ___-. -------__-___.---.--CONTR-ACT-NE(:CTT-AT TONS Al.)THORT'2E---- .. 0F,/27/78 0892 CETA T - ANNUAL PIAN MOD dRn3 u $ lOFPT OP LABOR_ OA/P7/7A OA92 11 S_DFAT OF LABOR CETA, I . N W'AIAL., PLAN MOD U803 _ __._(lfif?1f'tf1 - QFt9? _-_._._PRPTY:-CEASE'n E347:R tt t SiDF'wltR f z H^ikSTAF3,_pJ>TE COMCNT _____.__.___RELOCAT'l tat ry C 7NF tNFMCNT::FACIE 11" tS_CO - LES i 06/27/76 OA97 RE'LOCATt PLE CPNt=TNFMFNT FbCILTTIES,.. CO. ti LE�S;OR PRPTY LEASrrD^A47 RRPOKSXDI= DR-RICH-FSTAR WE_COMCNT o J OF,/P7/7A 0A9A ROFINA COMPUTFR SFRVTCF5_ CQ_- QNTRCT At E(�1T APPRVt? CO ANG . TESTTtJC; . i�i'C7_,_C}ATA_C1'R INPUT _ RO FS iTIJG PEC€3 _ .n�,./a7/7ft OAnR .._ COt7ftJP . -. T 'STING MT OAT.A._-C.TR-TNPtII'_..R.-_PRC?CI'SSINC PRG RO ING Ct?MRUTI~R-:ST:RV-TCFS _CO, - CNtRCT_-Atti� rr APPRVD Ohl27/7A 0900 TFS�; F.RACT CORP - CONTRACT APPROVED RETTRFMFNT_SURSIDTARY LEnGF_R SYSTEM ` 06/27/7A n9tiirl RFT,tRFM� NT SIJF3SIDrARY LE'IOGE'R SYSTEM TESSFRACT CORP - CONTRACT APPROVED 06/27/78 0907 DFFrRI-,lFD tMPE IMT Ac9Rt�iT fi:iJP-2fJfli�75--*-FiY1 ON -AREI�_---..__..__.__. . _--MYrRANT ROBERT- F----APPRVD- D9n7 MY3RANT R ~RFRT F - AP'RVD DEFERREDTMPRVt�T AGRMTL )p 2001-T5 AF. n€ /?7/7A - y n6/?7/78 OgOA ROAD. CLO SURF -* APPROVFP DANlitLLk H1rtY - DANVILLk ARTA 06/27/7A O9n8- nANVTLLE _HWY - 10AAIVTLt.E-, ARr-*A-- ._-----_-.______...._ . __._--- 0 OF,/97/7A OQ08 ROAM CLOSURE - APPROVFD N HART7_, AVF - DANVTLLE i nt,/p717A OPOR N HART? AVF' -� DAHVTL_F_ ROAD? .CL.OSURF - APPROVED n6/27/7A---__DgnB__.. - ROAD: CLO SURF-.^_. APPRC1VFn_.----_.__.._ S-HART?__-AVE;-:W-DANV TLLE____.._____.- ._-- 0 n6/?_7/7A 0908 S HARTZ AVF - DANVrLLF ROAD CLOSURE ,- APPROVE© 06/27/7A 0908 ROAD CLOSURE - APPROVED SAN RAMON VLY BLVr) - DANVIL.LE nh/P7/7A__ nn-nA-_ -SAN _R'AM0H V�_Y-RLVl7"b (�tCtIVT.Ci E_______.___.--_------_ _ __.__ ____ _____.....___------____NCJAD. CLOSURE'--R APPROVED- 0 Of)/P7/7A 090A POAI) CLOSURF APPROVFn DEL AMIGO RDDANVILI-E nF,/27/7R 090A ()FL AMTGO . RD 7 DANVILI E ROAD? CLOSURE T- ,AP? ROVED n6/27/78 (Jc)nn_ _ _ . F.TNAljCE._CTlF RFFFnFAL._:_ __. __ __.. ..._�_____..____ __._.___-_._---_.. QFVFLOPMtFNT-_RELATEQ FE Fc;_ -� PROPOSED n6/27/7A 0909 r) VrLOPMENT RFLXTFD Ft•C'S -� PROPOSED FINAj4CF, CTE REFERkA' L _ i 06/27/7A n9O9 F fidAFiCF CTS Rtf;'R AL _ . . FNCROACHMENT PERMIT ,FEE'S PROPOSED n€,127/7A 09nq F'NCROACHMEj,lT PFRNITT FF-, G -» PROPOSE[) __._ _. ._--._._ _ __.FTNANCF_' CTt, RE-Fi,_RE,AL. 0 0€,/27/7A 0Q0ci FTNANCE CTF, RFF''R":AL FRANCHISE FE=,"S PROPOSED 06/27/78 Onn1) FRANCHISE Fr(7S PRO(30SED FINAt10E CTS RFFER,-:AL_ n6/P7/7A 0916 APPEAL HFARTNG _• SHn 5308 -,._G0YAK_.v...OUNER _ _ - - -EL SORRANTiF COMM APPELl-'.ANT 06/27/7A 091€, FL SORRANTF COMH AS'-,OC -+ APPEU. AMT APPEAL HFARIIAG ti SUB 5308 -» GOYAK OVINER 0 7 0 0 0 ► 0 b -0 'o J 4 2 0 0