Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09281976 - R 76I IN 1 1976 SEPTEMBER TUESDAY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MFT IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT 9:00 A.H., TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1976 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman J. P. Kenny, presiding; Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. CLERK: J. R. Olsson, represented by Geraldine Russell, Deputy Clerk. S The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator- and Public Works Director. 00001 JAMES P.KENNY.R1CMMoNO CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P.Y.EHNY 1 ST?"""Cr CONTRA COSTA COUNT' c,.AU1M Nr ALFRED M.DIAS,ct sosnA [ EDMUND ti LINSNSCHOD 2N0 DISTRICT VICK CHAIRMAN JAMES E MORIARTY.LAFAT[TT< AND 8011 JAMES R OLSSON.couNT4 CL[RR 3RD DOTRICT SPECIAL OISTRjCTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD ANO Ot OFFICIO CL[/1K Of TMC i0A010 WARREN N.BOGGESS.cONCORO MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL H 4TDISTRICT SCAM CHAMS[ M RS ROO1071.AO�MMIR STRATION OLDG CHIC►CLERX . EDMUND A UNSCHEIO.►RTSsURG ►.O.9=Y11 PHONE(41W 372-2371 5TH o1511t1cT MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94553 TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 28, 1976 9:00 A.M. Meeting of the Board of Directors of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 7-A to consider adoption of a ;-mmm-n-umn resolution authorizing the Chairman and/or the Public Works Director, as ex officio Engineer of the District, to sign and file applications for federal grants under the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. The Board will meet in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. • 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public Works Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recommendations of Board Committees including Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) on offer of clinic space by Los Medanos Community Hospital District. 9:45 A.M. Executive Session (Government Code Section 54957.6) as required, or recess. 10:30 A.M# The Honorable Martin E. Rothenberg, Superior Court Presiding Judge, will address the Board concerning administration of the courts. 10:30 A.M. As Governing Board of Riverview Fire Protection District, receive bids for the provision of weed abatement services. Hearings on Planning Commission recommendations with respect to the following rezoning requests: 10:30 A.M. Robert H. Wilhelm, 2023-RZ, Danville area; and 10:35 A.M. Edward F. Biggs, 1997-RZ, El Sobrante area. If the aforesaid matters are approved as recommended, introduce ordinances,waive reading thereof, and fix October 5, 1976 for adoption. 10:55 A.M. Hearing on proposed abandonment of a .dedicated roadway in Minor Subdivision 252-72, Alhambra Valley area. 11:00 A.M. Receive bids for installation of the following: a. Pavement markers and rumble strips on various county roads; and b. Reflective pavement markers, Assessment District 1973-3, San Ramon area. 11:00 A.M. Status report by Public Works Director on the County Detention Center. 00002 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 28, 1976 ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 - 6: CONSENT 1. AUTHORIZE changes in the assessment roll. 2. AUTHORIZE settlement (750,000) of Superior Court Action No. 144900, Contra Costa County vs. Levin Metals Corporation. 3. ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of Delta Action Plan — Policies and Recommen- dations received from Delta Advisory 21anning Council. 4. ADOPT ordinances (introduced September 21, 1976) as follows: a. Sick leave accrual for employees of the El Sobrante, Moraga, Orinda, and Riverview Fire Protection Districts; b. Pay differentials for certain employees; c. Calculation of length-of-service credits; d. No. 76-69 rezoning land in the Bethel Island area; and e. Ordinance allowing bingo games in the unincorporated areas of the County. 5. AUTHORIZE extension of time in which to file final map of Subdivi- sion 4307, Byron area. 6. DENY the following claims: Raymond Davis; Richard Van Roman; Mr. and Mrs. Robert M. Dutton; Phillip Loville; and amended claim of Douglas Stewart. Items 7 - 19: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown fo lowing the item.) 7. REPORT from County Counsel with respect to Superior Court Action No. 167626, Donald B. Sills vs. Contra Costa County. CONSIDER ACTION TO BE TAKER 8. REPORT from Director of Planning (responding to Board referral of the request of Mr. Carlo Zocchi, Concord, for refund of park dedication fees paid with the filing of Subdivisions 4670 and 4824) citing conditions imposed by the Planning Commission with respect to park land requirements, reviewing pertinent ordinance code provisions, and suggesting that the Board may wish one of its committees to study and submit a recommendation on this matter. REFER TO BOARD COMMITTEE AND COUNTY COUNSEL FOR REVIE-1 9. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, recommending that the contract with Ronoh School be terminated, and also recommending that the therapeutic nursery component of the program be retained and a contract negotiated immediately with a legally constituted non-Profit corporation. ACKNIOVILEDG E RECEIPT AND PFEFER TO DIRECTOR," HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR R ECO101ENDATION 10. LETTER from Mr. C. N. Wilson suggesting that provision be made for one or two mobile home parks in the area between Walnut Creek and San Ramon. REFER TO DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 11. LETTER from Director, State Department of Housing and Community Development, and Chairman, California Advisory Committee on Far worker Housing and Community Development, transmitting copy of the proposed State Farmworker Housing Assistance Plan for review, and inviting participation in public hearings thereon. Ry ER i0 DIRECTOR OF PLANNING 00003 1,4 y Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 28, 1976. 12. M IORANDUM from Director of Planning transmitting proposed sign ordinance for the San Ramon Valley Area (drafted by the Commercial Development Committee of the San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce in conjunction with Planning Department staff) and recommending that said ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission for hearings thereon. APPROVE RECO14MENDATION 13. MEMORANDUM from County Assessor (responding to Board referral of the request of Yr. H. P. Richter, Alamo, for reimbursement of a portion of his 1975-1976 property taxes and a reduction in the 1976-1977 assessment) detailing actions taken previously by his office, the Hearing Officer, and the Assessment Appeals Board, stating that the subject property is currently assessed lower than all of the properties cited by Mr. Richter for comparison, and indicating that the current assessment is proper; and MEMORANDUM from Chairman, Assessment Appeals Board, advising that any further appeal for reduction of the 1975 tax assessment should be made to the Superior Court, and that Mr. Richter's proper avenue of action for reduction of the 1976 assessment was to file an application with said Appeals Board. ACKNO;a2- EDGE RECEIPT AND DIRECT CLEM TO TRANSMIT COPIES OF MF140RANDA TO MR. RICHTER 14. LETTER from Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that the Drug Abuse Board recommends that sponsorship of the Pittsburg Area Preventive Drug Abuse Program be shifted from Los Medanos Hospital to the City of Pittsburg, which move the Advisory Board endorses. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HU14AN RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR REPORT 15. RESOLUTION adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors requesting the Governor to call a special session of the Legislature for purposes of property tax relief and reform, and urging other counties to take similar action. REFER TO ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 16. LETTER from Hospital and Institutional Workers' Union, Local 250 of the Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, request- ing recognition in accordance with Section 34-10.004 of the County Ordinance Code. REFER TO EMPLOYEE RELATIONS OFFICER FOR VERIFICATION OF REQUIRED INFORMATION 17. LETTER from Hilltop Center Parents Group transmitting check for $9,500 for architectural design of therapeutic swimming pool to be constructed at George biller Jr. Memorial West. ACCEPT DONATION AND EXPRESS APPRECIATION 18. ANNUAL REPORT of the Metropolican Transportation Commission for fiscal year 1975-1976. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 19. LETTER from the County Counsel of Alameda County transmitting copy of proposed amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement establishing the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. REFER TO DIRECTOR, flUI4M RESOURCES AGENCY, FOR RECODINU NDATION Items 20- 23: IN 0114LiATION (Copies of communications listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties.) 20. COPY of letter from the Secretary, State Health and Welfare Agency, stating that the Regional Health Administrator, Region IY, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, has been advised that the Joint Powers Agency (Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency) is best able to carry out the provisions of Public Law 93-641. 00004 -Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 28, 1976 21. COPY of letter from Chairman, Family and Children*s Services Advisory Committee, addressed to Dr. Charles Pollack, Acting Local Mental Health Director, expressing the -hope that tempo- rary funding will be forthcoming for the Ronoh School project. 22. NOTICE of hearing before the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Wildlife Senator John A. Nejedly, Chairman) October 14, 1976 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board Chambers, County Administration Building, Martinez, on "The New Source Review Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Act." 23. SUVINARY REPORT of State Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Preven- tion Commission meetings with local delinquency prevention commissions. Persons addressing the Board should co fete the form orovi ed on the rostrum and furnishthe Clerk w th a written copy, of their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITZIS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. NOTICE OF MEETINGS OF PUBLIC INTEREST (For additional information please phone the number indicated) San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission 1st and 3rd Thursdays of the month - phone 557-3686 Association of Bay Area Governments 3rd Thursday of the month - phone 841-9730 East Bay Regional Park District 1st and 3rd Tuesdays of the month - phone 531-9300 Bay Area Air Pollution Control District 1st Wednesday of the month - phone 771-6000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 4th Wednesday of the month - phone 849-3223 Contra Costa County Water District lst and 3rd Wednesdays of the month; study sessions all other Wednesdays - phone 682-5950 00005 i OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martinez, California To: Board of Supervisors Subject: Recommended Actions ' September 28, 1976 From: Arthur G. Will, County Administrator I. PERSONNEL ACTIONS 1. Decrease hours of positions as follows: Cost Department Center From To Civil 582 40/40 -d=ins- 37/40 Administrative Service trative Aide- Aide-CETA CETA, =02 _ 2. Authorize fifth step appointment of Typist Clerk-Project in the Health Department, to be assigned to and paid for by the WIC Program, as recommended by the County Administrator. II. TRAVE_T, AUTHORIZATIONS 3. Name and Destination Department and Date Meeting .Duane Dillon, Quantico, VA Symposium on Crime Sheriff-Coroner 10-11-76 to 10-15-76 Laboratory; Develop- (Federal funds) ment E. F. Wanaka, Atlanta, GA IAAO Conference on County Assessor 10-17-76 to 10-20-76 Assessment Adminis- tration Chris Adams, South Lake Tahoe, C3 Constitutional Rights Juvenile Justice 9-27-76 to 9-29-76 Foundation Seminar Commission III. APPROPRIATION ADJUST�w"NTS 4'. County Medical Services. add $878 of State funds (70 per cent of cost) to internal adjustment of $377 to purchase - equipment for Mental Health Residential Drug Treatment Programs. 5. Internal adjustments. Changes not affecting totals for following budget units: Human Resources Agency (Manpower Program - CETA, Title I) . 00006 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-28-76 Page: 2. IV, LIENS AND COLLECTIONS 6. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute Satisfaction of Lien taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Dan Heath, who has made repayment in full. 7. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to initiate legal action in Small Claims Court against Braxton Cooper ($300) and George Price, dba Price Electrical Co. ($202.74) , to recover costs owed Contra Costa County. V. CONTRACTS AND GRAA'TS 8. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to sign modifi- cations to the County's •CETA Title I grant with the U. S. Department of Labor to de-obligate $280,852 in transition quarter (7/1/76-9/30/76) funding to allow these funds to be carried over to the Federal 1977 Fiscal Year funding period (10/1/76-9/30/77) . 9. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to sign modifi- cations to the County's Title I grant application to the U. S. Department of Labor for fiscal year 1976-1977; the modifications decrease the grant amount to $2,513,514 because of a reduction in the carry-over balance to $280,852. 10. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a grant application for the Calendar Year 1977 Head Start Program, for a total of $675,001, which reflects $494,492 of Federal funds plus $180,509 in non-Federal resources (the total County contribution is $64,277) . 11. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a grant action in the amount of $12,070 to cover the Community Services Administration funded Summer Youth Recreation Program during the period July 1, 1976 to September 30, 1976. 12. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a Consultant Contract in the amount of $2,576 with Mrs. Maria Diaz to serve as Parent Assistant to the Head Start Speech Pathologist for the period October 4, 1976 through June 7, 1977; and authorize payment of mileage to said consultant at the rate of 15C per mile, not to exceed a total of $420 (Federaly funded) . 00007 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-28-76 Page: 3. V. CONTRACTS AND GRANTS - continued 13. Approve and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period W. M. Bogart, Autopsy- services $5,000 9-1-76 M.D. per mo. to 6-30-77 Martin Fink Psychological Not to 9-1-76 Ph.D. evaluation for exceed to Probation Dept. $1,750 6-30-77 City of Clayton **Historic building $6,500 9-28-76 restoration to 6-30-77 Ambrose-.Recrea- **Land acquisition $40,000 9-28-76 tion and Park and park develop- to District ment 6-30-77 **2nd Year Community Development AEP associates Prepare EIR for $1,850 9-29-76 Subdivision (Advanced to No. 4881 by Devel- 3-7777 oper) Rubicon, Inc. Community work- $0188* 9-14-76 shops in "Child to Abuse and Neglect 12-14-76 Prevention' *(90% State funded) State Depart- Community Dern a- $164,924* 7-1-76 ment of Health stration Rat to Control Program 6-30-77 *(funded entirely with State funds) 14. Authorize Director, Euman Resources agency, to si5n Novation Agreement and new Professional Services Agreement with an additional physician (Roger A. Greenwald, K.D.) for County Medical Services. 00008 To: Board of Supervisors From: County Administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-28-76 Page: 4. V. CONTRACTS AND GR;LNTS - continued 15. Authorize Director, Human Resources Agency, to execute agreement with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. in the amount of $103,320 (758 Federal-, 258 non-County local share) for transportation services for mentally retarded adults to sheltered workshops during the period October 1, 1876 to September 30, 1977. VI. LEGISLATION None. VII. REAL ESTATE ACTIONS 16. Exercise option to extend lease between Contra Costa County and Duffel-Financial and Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners for one year and 55 days commencing November 1, 1976- and ending December 25, 1977, for premises at 2401-D Stanwell Drive, Concord for continued occupancy by the Human Resources Agency; -Manpower Project. 17. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute one year lease between County and Neighborhood House of North Richmond for continued use of premises at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond for Health Department Rat Control Program. 18. Authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute one year lease between County and Rubicon, Inc. for premises at 169 South 6th Street, Richmond, for Social Service Food Stamp Program. VIII.OTHE.IR ACTIONS 19. As recommended by the County Auditor-Controller, authorize .an increase in the revolving fund of the Richmond Judicial District Marshal from $50 to $100. 20. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to advance funds in the amount of $238,500 for the operation of the Economic Opportunity Program (Central Administration and Delegate Agencies) pending receipt of approved Federal grant funds for the fourth quarter of the 1976 program year. 21. Amend Resolution No. 76/638, establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for fiscal year 1976-1977, to add Work Training, Inc., Santa Barbara, at $829 per month, and Holeman, Inc. (AKA Bay Area Boys Home, Inc.) , San Mateo, at $979 per month. 00009 To: Board Suazrv4 50::5 Froc.: Coun�y ?c-ninisgator Re- Recom-anded actions 9-28-76 Page: 5- -i3%.eu "y the 1.'ouaty Auditor-Controller, authori .aa increase is the revolving fze und of the Richmond Judicial District Marshal from $50 to $100. 20. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to advance funds in amount of $238,500 for the operation of the Ecthe onomic Opportunity Program (Central Administrati Agencies) pending receipt of a on and Delegate d Fed for the fourth quarter of the 1976 1.976 Peral grant funds program year. 21. Amend Resolution ?No. 76/638, establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for Discal year 1976-1977, to add Wor-k Training, Inc., Santa Barbara, at $829 per month, and Holeman, Inc. (AKA Bay Area Boys Home, Inc.) , San Mateo, at $979 per month. 00009 To: Board of Supervisors From: County administrator Re: Recommended Actions 9-28-76 Page: 5. VIiI.OTH.B ?ACTIONS- continued 22. Authorize County Treasurer=_nx Collector to solicit bids for temporary borrowing of funds not to exceed $15,000,000, pursuant to soLprnment Cc-de Sections 53850 through 53858. 23. Approve contract documents submitted by the Contra Costa County.Fire Protection District for the abatement of weeds, -rubbish and other sire hazard conditions within the district for the period of December 1, 1976 through N.ov;•.^..ber 30, 1977 and advertise for bids to be received on November 2, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. 2:. Authorize County Auditor-Controller to pay the cost of utility services (gas and electricity) for the Concerted Services Project, inc., in Pittsburg, through December 31, 1976. 25. County Auditor-Controller (County =ire Protection Districts) . Reduce i97o"-1377 :fiscal year budgets of .6allowing County fire protection districts to remain within the legal maximum tax levy, pursuant to Gover--Lent Code Section 29105: D:S t_:C t ;_'mount 3rertwocd $ =,066 Byron 1,860 Craccett-Ca=c_ui,no2 8,041 :1 Sobran to 90,895 Pi:.ole 1,895 Tassajara 2,812 East-ern 17,521 NaT� Cha-;=an to ask far any cc=en-,s by interested citizens in attendance a� tie meeting subject to carrying `forward any particular item zo a late= speci-fied time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes wit.. consideraticn of otter calendar items. 00010 w = , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 28, 1976 EXTRA BUSINESS SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS I AND II Item 1. ROLLINGWOOD, RODEO, CROCKETT AND EL SOBRANTE li9PROVE,MENTS - APPROVE AGREEt1ENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisnrs approve and authorize the Public Works Director to execute Consulting Services Agreements with Santina and Thompson Consulting Civil Engineers, Inc. of Walnut Creek for preparation of applications, contract plans, specifications and other engineering services for the proposed Rollingwood, Rodeo, Crockett and El Sobrante Improvement Project to be submitted for funding under Title I of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. The Phase I Agreement, covering preparation of the application, has a payment limit of $9,500. The Board of Supervisors approved funding for the Phase I Agreement by Board Order dated September 21, 1976. The Phase II Agreement, covering preparation of contract documents, has a payment limit of $22,300, which is reimbursable from Title I funds. Phase 11 work will not be started until the project application is approved by the Economic Development Agency. (RE: Work Order Nos. 4353-665 and 4357-925) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 2. WALNUT BOULEVARD DRAIN - EXECUTE AGREEr1ENT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Vater Conservation District, approve and authorize its Chairman to sign the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the County and the District for the construction of the proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain. The County is proposing to construct the Walnut Boulevard Drain under Title'1 of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. The Agreement provides for the (continued on next page) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page 1 of 3 September 28, 1976 00011 i I _94 likwhv�r Item 2 continued: construction of the storm drain outfall into the Walnut Creek Channel by the Flood Control District (Zone 3B). (RE: Work Order 4389-925 - Flood Control Zone No. 3B) (FCP) Item 3. WALNUT BOULEVARD DRAIN - AUTHORIZE APPLICATION FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMIT - Walnut Creek Area E It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Director to apply for and execute an Encroachment Permit from the City of Walnut Creek to construct portions of the proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain within the City-owned street right of way. The Walnut Boulevard Drain is proposed for construction under Title. 1 of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. (RE: Work Order 4389-925) (FCP) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS III AND V Item 4. TREAT BOULEVARD AND WILLOW PASS ROAD - APPROVE ADDENDUM - Walnut Creek and Pittsburg Areas It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and concur in the issuing of Addendum No. 1 to the plans and special provisions for the Treat Boulevard/Willow Pass Road Median Landscaping project. The Addendum clarifies irrigation system work to be completed by the contractor in conjunction with Contra Costa County Water District and Bay Water Service. Bids will be received on October 12, 1976. The Addendum will not change the Engineer's estimated construction cost. All planholders have been notified. (RE: Project No. 4861-4324-661-76) (RD) EXTRA BUSINESS Public '4ork5 Department Page 2 of 3 Septenber 28, 1976 00012 f SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS IV AND V Item 5. SHORE ACRES, CLYDE AND NEST PITTSBURG IMPROVEHEUTS - APPROVE AGREEMERTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve Consulting Services Agreements with Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. and authorize the Public Works Director to execute them. The Agreements are for preparation of applications, • contract plans, specifications and other engineering services for the Shore Acres, Clyde and West Pittsburg Improvenent Project to be submitted for funding under Title I of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. The Phase I Agreement, covering preparation of the application, has a payment limit of $10,000. The Board of Supervisors approved funding for the Phase I Agreement by Board Order dated September 21, 1976. The Phase II Agreement, covering preparation of contract documents, has a payment limit of $154,000, which is reimbursable from Title I funds. Phase II work will not be started until the project application is approved by the Economic Development Agency. (RE: Work Order 4350-665) (RD) EXTRA BUSINESS Public Works Department Page 3 of 3 September 28, 1976 00013 ;r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 23, 1976 A G E N D A REPORTS Report A. EL CERRO BOULEVARD - Danville Area On August 31, 1976, the Board of Supervisors referred an August 18, 1976 communication from the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, con- cerning frontage improvements with respect to the extension of E1 Cerro Boulevard through Church property, to the Public Works Director for report. The Public Works Department did considerable preliminary engineering for the construction of El Cerro Boulevard between Danville Highway and La Gonda Way in 1971 and 1972. At that time a proposal was sent to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, offering to do all paving and frontage improvements at no cost to the Church in exchange for the dedication of the necessary right of way, all of which was Church property and amounted to about 1.3 acres. The Church responded in agreement with the proposal, but the exchange was never made due to a lack of County funding for the project. In 1976, the Church requested a land use permit and Public Works recommended conditions which included dedication of the right-of-way. and a deferred agreement for curb and sidewalk, with paving to be done by the County in recognition of the greater than normal amount of land to be dedicated. The 1976 requirements would appear to be fair and in accordance with Board policy since the County would be doing considerable paving in return for the excessive right-of-way requirement; however, since the Church did agree to the County's 1972 proposal, it is recommen- ded that the 1976 requirements be revised to conform to the 1972 proposal. The additional cost to the County is minimal. Since there were errors in the application for the permit under which the 1976 recommendations were imposed, the Church has filed for a new land use permit (Number 2148-76) , and Public Works will recommend conditions conforming to the 1972 proposal, as requested by the Church. It is recommended that the Board accept this report and direct the Clerk of the Board to send copies to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, 2900 Lakeshore Avenue, Oakland, CA 94610, and Mr. James E. Crossen, 1200 Contra Costa Boulevard, Concord, CA 94520. (JMW) Report B. PROPOSED ABANDONMENT OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD SAN RAISON BRANCH LINE The Southern Pacific Transportation Company has filed a notice with the Interstate Commerce Commission, requesting the authority to abandon railroad service on the San Ramon Branch Line from a point near Concord Avenue to near Dougherty Road in Alameda County. As a result of that filing, the Board of Supervisors requested that the (continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department 9 VV D0014 September 28, 1976 A i Report B continued: Public Works Department prepare a report concerning the abandonment, and referred to the Director of Planning a communication from i Mr. George Cardinet requesting that the County implement its trail plan which includes the use of the railroad right-of-way as a part of the trail system. I �_. _.The official notice indicated that the Interstate Commerce Commission will rule on the proposed application without a hearing unless pro- tests are received which contain information indicating a need for such hearings. Any protest referring to the Notice of Abandonment must be filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission not later than October 6, 1976. Because of the relatively short notice and lack of detailed information, it is not possible to make a detailed assess- ment of the impact of the proposed abandonment. Following is a partial list of the unanswered issues: 1. The use and/or disposition of the right-of-way, if abandonment is approved. 2. Conversion of licenses and present public uses for such purposes as drainage, public and private railroad crossings, paths, etc. to descriptive easements. 3. Credit to the County for the unamortized value of grade crossing protection that would be removed by the Company. 4. Environmental considerations. 5. The need for railroad service in the future to industrially zoned land in the San Ramon Valley. Western Electric Company, in a letter to the Public Works Director dated September 15, 1976, raised this issue and protested the abandonment. For reasons stated above, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the following actions: a. Request standing in the petition for abandonment to ensure full involvement in the process. b. Oppose the proposed abandonment and request that public hearings be held locally to provide for full disclosure of all facts so that abandonment conditions can be formulated. It is further recommended that the Board authorize the Public Works Director, with the assistance of County Counsel, to file the protest with the Interstate Commerce Commission. The Planning Department and County Counsel concur in this report and recommendations. (TP) i SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. NORTH RICHMOND BYPASS - ACCEPT QUITCI`AIM DEED - North Richmond Area i It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the Quitclaim Deed from Herman E. Martin and Catherine A. Martin, his wife, dated i September 20, 1976. The Quitclaim Deed clears, in favor of the County, a title discrep- ancy as to a private 20-foot right-of-way which crosses the 5.005+ acre Harvey ownership the County purchased earlier this month. No additional payment is proposed. (RE: Project No. 0572-4345-663-72) (RP) A_ G E N D A_ �t0015 t 1 Public Works Department V V 01� a SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS II, III, V Item 2. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: A. Accept the following instruments: No. _ _. Instrument Date Grantor Reference _ 1. Grant Deed 9-20-76 James Investment Co., Rd. No. 5301E Inc., a California corporation 2. Grant Deed 7-21-76 D.C. Development and MS 46-76 Construction Co., Inc., a California corporation 3. Consent to Deeding 7-29-76 Glenn L. Allen, et al MS 46-76 4. Relinquishment of 7-21-76 D.C. Development and MS 46-76 Abutter's Rights Construction Co. , Inc., a California corporation S. Consent to Offer of 8-4-76 James A. Baca MS 67-74 Dedication 6. Grant Deed 8-3-76 Rudolph Gestri, et al MS 67-74 7. Consent to Dedication 8-3-76 Pacific Telephone and MS 11-76 Telegraph Company, a California corporation 8. Grant Deed 6-23-76 Gwendolyn M. Richart SUB. 4701 9. Relinquishment of 6-23-76 Gwendolyn M. Richart SUB. 4701 Abutter's Rights 10. Relinquishment of 6-23-76 Gwendolyn M. Richart SUB. 4701 Abutter's Rights (second document) 11. Consent to Dedication 8-30-76 Pacific Gas and Electric MS 65-76 Company, a California corporation (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 3. SUBDIVISION 4508 - ACCEPT SUBDIVISION - Lafayette Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: A. Issue an Order stating that the construction of improvements in- Subdivision 4508 has been satisfactorily completed. B. Accept as County roads those streets which are shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4508 filed March 25, 1976 in Book 183 of Maps at page 7. Subdivider: Lindsay Homes, Inc. P. O. Box 1437 Hemet, California Location: Subdivision 4508 is located on Dalewood Drive west of Happy Valley Road. (LD) A_ G E N D A Public Works Deoartment Page 3 of 9 00016 September 28,-1976 e V Item 4. NORTH GATE ROAD - RESCIND RESOLUTION - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors rescind Resolution No. 76/442, dated May 18, 1976, summarily abandoning portions of North Gate Road in the Walnut Creek area. A replacement Resolution of Abandonment will be presented for Board approval as soon as details regarding a utility reservation have been determined and included. (RP) Item 5. SUBDIVISION 4220 - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the improvements in Subdivision 4220 have satis- factorily met the guaranteed performance standards for one year. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Envar-Lafayette Company the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement. Owner: Envar-Lafayette Company 1060 North Fourth Street San Jose, CA 95112 Location: Subdivision 4220 is located on Rosemont Court north of Springbrook Road. (LD) Item 6. SUBDIVISION 3918 - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Town of Moraga On September 1, 1976, the Town of Moraga declared that the public improvements in Subdivision 3918 had met the guaranteed performance standards for one year and authorized the County to refund all cash deposits and bonds. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Singer Housing Company the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement and the $350 cash bond as surety for deficiency repairs. Owner: Singer Housing Company ' 2777 Alvarado Street San Leandro, California Location: Subdivision 3918 is located on the west side of Moraga Road north of Campolindo Drive. (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS III, V Item 7. ACCEPTANCE OF INSTRUMENTS It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: A. Accept the following instruments for recording only: No. Instrument Date Grantor Reference 1. Offer of Dedication 5-25-76 Ronald Morrison Ford, B4164-76 for Roadway Purposes Executor of the Estate of Annie M. Ford 3e 2. Offer of Dedication 7-1-76 Herman J. Tijsseling, MS 37-76 for Roadway Purposes Inc., a California corp. (continued on next page) A_ G E N D A 00017 Public Works Department Page 4 of 9 September 28, 1976 item 7 continued: No. Instrument Date Grantor Reference 3. Offer of Dedication 7-1-76 Herman J. Tijsseling, MS 37-76 for Drainage Purposes Inc., a California corp. 4. Offer of Dedication 8-26-76 Robert Boswell, et al MS 25-75 for Roadway Purposes S. Offer of Dedication 6-25-76 Robert Boswell, et al MS 25-75 for Roadway Purposes (second document) 6. Offer of Dedication 6-25-76 Robert Boswell, et al MS 25-75 for Drainage Purposes 7. Offer of Dedication 7-16-76 Union Safe Deposit Bank MS 33-76 for Roadway Purposes 8. Offer of Dedication 7-19-76 Stanley E. Pereira, MS 65-76 for Roadway Purposes Executor of the Estate of Manuel E. Pereira, Jr. 9. Offer of Dedication 7-16-76 Union Safe Deposit Bank MS 65-76 for Roadway Purposes 10. Offer of Dedication 8-26-76 Alvin Urricelqui, et al MS 34-75 for Roadway Purposes 11. Offer of Dedication 6-25-76 Alvin Urricelqui, et al MS 34-75 mor Roadway Purposes (second document) (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV No Items AGENDA CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE 00018 A G E N D A Public Works Department., Page 5 of 9 September 28, 1976 f , SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V Item 8. SUBDIVISION AIS 34-76 - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Oakley Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the Deferred Improvement Agreement with Tony Cutino, et al., and authorize the Public Works Director to execute it on behalf of the County. The document fulfills a condition of approval for Subdivision MS 34-76 as required by the Board of Adjustment. Owners: Dwight Meadows, et al., Route 1, Box 354-AA, Oakley, CA 94561 Location: The property involved in Subdivision MS 34-76 fronts for 185+ feet on an 18-foot paved agricultural transition road, providing access to O'Hara Avenue, in the Oakley area. (RE: Assessor's Parcel No. 34-100-010) (LD) Item 9. CROW CANYON ROAD - ACCEPT CONTRACT - San Ramon Area The work performed under the contract for reconstruction and widening of pavement and improvement of roadside drainage on Crow Canyon Road was completed by the contractor, L & L Equipment Rental, DBA L & L Equipment Co. of Pleasant Hill, on September 13, 1976, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifica- tions at a contract cost of approximately $66,000. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of September 13, 1976. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. (RE: Project No. 4711-4329-76 (661) ) (C) Item 10- DISCOVERY BAY BOULEVARD - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Byron Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the improvements for the Discovery Bay Boulevard -Road Acceptance Project, consisting of the widening of a portion of Discovery Bay Boulevard, have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for one year. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Discovery Bay Corporation the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Road Improvement Agreement. Owner: Discovery Bay Corporation,P.O. Box 85, Byron, CA 94514 Location: On the west side of Discovery Bay Boulevard north of State Highway 4. (LD) Item 11. SUBDIVISION 4410 - ACCEPT SUBDIVISION - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Issue an Order stating that the construction of improvements for Subdivision 4410 has been satisfactorily completed. 2. Accept as County roads those streets which are shown and dedi- cated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4410 filed November 7, 1973 in Book 164 of daps at page 37. Subdivider: Kay Building Company P. O. Box 1556, Burlingame, CA 94010 Location: Subdivision 4410 is located east of- I-680 and north of Greenbrook Drive (LD) A_ G E_ N D A /,r,rt1(] Public Works Department Page 6 of 9 V V 019 September 28, 1976 r l�" :9 Item 12. MARSH CREEK ROAD BRIDGE - APPROVE AGREEMENT - Brentwood Area k It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize its Chairman to execute the County-State Holdover Agreement No. 27 for a Federal-Aid Secondary Project. This Agreement provides for the use of $267r 544 of Federal-Aid g P Secondary and State Highway Matching Funds for the reconstruction of the Marsh.,.•Creek .Road:hridge and.its approaches located one- fourth mile east of Deer Valley Road. County budgeted funds totaling $22,456 provide the balance of the project funding. The Agreement also provides for the holdover of available balances from previous fiscal year Federal-Aid apportionments and their combination into this one project. The project is currently under design and is scheduled for con- struction in the spring of 1978. (RE: Project No. 3971-4301-661-76) (RD) Item 13. SUBDIVISION 4561 - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Alamo Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Declare that the improvements in Subdivision 4561 have satis- factorily met the guaranteed performance standards for one year. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Bolla Develop- ment the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement. Owner: Bolla Development 3158 Miranda Avenue, Alamo, CA 94507 Location: Subdivision 4561 is located on the west side of Danville Highway south of Alamo Way. (LD) Item 14. SUBDIVISION NS 154-71 - REFUND CASH DEPOSIT - Brentwood Area On February 3, 1976 a reversion to acreage map was recorded on Subdivision MS 154-71, thereby relieving the owner of any responsi- bility for constructing improvements. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Director to refund to Raymond Vail and Associates the $500 cash bond posted as surety under the Subdivision Agreement and the $900 which was paid as an inspection fee. Owner: Albert Isola 6 La Cresta Road, Orinda, CA 94563 Location: Subdivision MS 154-71 is located on the west side of an unnamed road right of way approximately 1,200 feet south of Lone Oak Road. (LD) Item 15. HARTZ AVENUE - TRAFFIC REGULATION Danville Area At the request of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2252 be approved as follows: (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 7 of 9 September 28, 1976 00620 Item 15 Continued: Pursuant to Section 22.507 of the California vehicle Code parking is hereby declared to be prohibited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays and holidays Danville, excepted, on the south side ofPHartf Ahe�nuen} Y7i5AF)nf R^rt• hAni nni nn at ^ r 7i rt 4n feat W is ucaiiaiu.0 Lvad right Ot Wa a I- ' 'L"- "L of Lone Oak Road. y approximately 1,200 feet south (LD) Item 15. HARTZ AVENUE - TRAFFIC REGULATION Danville Area At the request of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommend=-CL that Traffic Resolution No. 2252 be approved as follows: (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Page 7 of 9 Public Works Department 00620 September 28, 1976 �, Item 15 Continued: Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code parking is hereby declared to be prohibited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excepted, on the south side of Hartz Avenue (#4725AF) , Danville, beginning at a point 40 feet west of the center line of Hartz Court and extending westerly a distance of 100 feet. (TO) GENERAL Item 16. MARTINEZ ANIMAL CONTROL CENTER - APPROVE CHANGE ORDER - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve, and author- ize the Public Works Director to execute Change Order No. 8 to the construction contract with William Dahn, Pleasant Hill, for the new euthanair room and kennel run at the Martinez Animal Control Center. This Change Order is in the amount of $1,803.38 and is necessary to pay for additional excavation of unsuitable material and backfilling with rock. (RE: 1003-102-7712-602) (B & G) Item 17. COUNTY FINANCE BUILDING - ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans and specifications for the Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, 625 Court Street, Martinez, and direct its Clerk to advertise for construction bids to be received until 11:00 a.m. on October 26,1976. The Engineer's estimated cost of the construction contract is $20,000. This project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class lA Categorical Exemption under the County Guidelines. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors concur in this finding and instruct the Director of Planning to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk. (RE: 1003-086-7710-621) (B & G) Item 18. BUCHANAN FIELD - ACCEPTANCE OF FAA GRANT OFFER - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept a Grant Offer in the maximum amount of $319,500 (90% of the project cost) , from the Federal Aviation Administration to be used for Project No. 6-06-0050-03 to acquire a property interest in land for the Runway 19R Clear Zone for Buchanan Field Airport. It is further recommended that the Board authorize its Chairman to sign the Statement of Accept- ance of the Grant Offer on behalf of the County. (RE: Work Order 5438-927) (A) Item 19. FIRE STATION NO. 11 - ACCEPT CONTRACT AS COMPLETE - Clayton Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, accept as complete as of September 20, 1976, the contract with Renfroe Meador, Inc., DBA Enterprise Roofing Service of Walnut Creek, for the Re-Roofing of Fire Station No. 11, Clayton, and direct its Clerk to file the appropriate Notice of Completion. (RE: 2025-2025-7710-610) (B & G) AGENDA Public Works Department Page 8 of 9 00021 September 28, 1976 A r., Item.20. FEDERAL-AID SECONDARY ROAD SYSTEM - APPROVAL OF SYSTEM AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONS Federal and State requirements necessitate the adoption of a Federal-Aid Secondary Road System by the Board of Supervisors. ., It is therefore recommended that the Board of Supervisor's adopt a Resolution approving_the.Federal-Aid System in.,Contra .Costa County as proposed by the State, and consisting of those roads which are classified as major collectors in the Federal Functional Classification System, and that the Board propose that the FAS System additionally include the following roads: Route From To Castro Ranch Road Urbanized limits near Alhambra Valley Road Hillside Drive Pinole Valley Road Urbanized limits near Urbanized limits near Alhambra Valley Road Pinole Martinez San Ramon Valley Urbanized limits near Urbanized limits near Boulevard Norris Canyon Road Montevideo Drive Camino Tassajara Urbanized limits near County line Road Sycamore Valley Road Waterfront Road I-680 near Martinez Urbanized limits near Port Chicago Highway Nichols Road Deer Valley Road bone Tree Way Balfour Road Balfour Road Deer Valley Road Byron Highway (TP) Item 21. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WATER AGENCY 1. The Delta Water Quality Report is submitted for the Board of Supervisors' information and public distribution. No action required. 2. It is requested that the Board of Supervisors consider attached 'Calendar of Water Meetings." No action required. (EC) Prepared Jointly by the Water Resources Representative and the Chief Engineer of the Contra Costa County {Mater Agency September 28, 1976 CALENDAR OF WATER AIEETIXGS TIl ATTENDANCE DATE DAY SPONSOR PLACE REMARKS Recommended Authorization Oct. 1 Fri. California 9:00 Friday Regular Meeting Staff Water C.C.C. Commission Nater District Offices oo()gr i t , Contracts, Agreements, or other documents approved by the Board this day are microfilmed with the order except in those instances where -the clerk was not :furnished with the documents prior to the time when the minutes were micro- filmed. In such cases, when the documents are received they will be placed in the appropriate file (to be microfilmed at a later time). I 00023 • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearing(B) held; The Board ORDrRS that said ordinance(B) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law. Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 76-73 Allowing bingo games in unincorporated CONTRA COSTA TIMES areas of the County. PASSED on September 28, 1976 by the following vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NOES ABSENT j. P. -Kenny v ( ) ( ) A. 11. Dias ( ) J. E. Moriarty (v ( ) i. K. Boggess E. A. hirschei.d I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day ofSeptember , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ccti Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 154-1 I`.axine m. Pie el 00024 In the Board of Supervisors F of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. ` This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which amend(s) the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County and was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORDERS that said ordinances(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law. Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper - 76-73 Adds Article 52-2.3 to Code Contra Costa.Times allowing Bingo games in the unincorporated areas. PASSED on by the follaming vote of the Board: Supervisors AYES NO ABSENT J. P. Kenny ( ) l A. M. Dias � l J. E. Moriarty x3 W. N. Boggess ( ) E. A. Linscheid (X ( ) ( ) 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September , 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y Deputy Clerk H sa 12r74 - I5 iu� I•:axine M. tdeuf d OOU2� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 Ig, 76 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Adopted. c This being the date fixed to adopt the ordinance(s) indicated, which uss (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board ORDM.RS that said ordinance(s) is (are) adopted and the Clerk shall publish same as required by law.' Ordinance Number Subject Newspaper 76-70 Sick leave accrual for employees Contra Costa' Times of the E1 Sobrante, Moraga, Orinda and Riverview Fire Protection Districts to become operative on November 1, 1976. 76-71 Calculating length-of-service Contra Costa Times credits. 76-72 Pay differentials for certain Contra Costa Times employees. PASSED on Seotember 28, 1476 by the following vote of the Board: Sur►ervisors AYES NOES ABSENT j. P. Kenny t ) ( ) ( ) A. 14. Dias x ) ( ) J. E. Moriarty (_ W. N. Boggess E. A. binscheid g � 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September t9 76 J. R. OLSSON. Clerk -B Deputy Clerk " ?a 12[74 _'''w• Ronda Amdahl O0v2 t BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COBTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Be: Zoning Ordinances Passed Date: RP 'tp,-omhP_y2g_ 1!R76 This beim�$$ the date fixed to consider adoption of the following ordinances) rezoning property as indicated, which was •(were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board orders that this'(these) ordinance(s) is (are) .passed, and the Clerk shall have it (them) published as indicated below: .. Ordinance Application . Number Applicant Number Area Newspaper. 76-69 L.' E. Weisenburg 1832-RZ -Bethel -Island Brentwood News Jr.• (Delta Coves PASSED on September 28, 1976 by the following vote:' AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Bogges, E. A. Linscheid, J. P. Kenny. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct record and copy of action duly taken by this Board- on the above date.. ATTEST: J_ R. OLSSJii, county Cleric' and ex officio Cleric of the Board: 00021 ZZomn: er 28 1 976 a ma In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , lq 76 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THIS BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 i S f 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors.on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28t%ay of September 19 76 y s J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Dorothy acDonald . 00028 H-24 3,r-6 15m •x- 1: P0S1TI0N ADJUSTMENT REQUEST Department r,vi7 Service _ Budget Unit IV Date 9j7nj7fi .I I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of supervisors affbwd this 28t%ay of September . 1976 1 i I R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Dorothy MacDonald . 00028 H-24 31:6 15m POS 1 T I0N ADJUSTMENT R E 0 U E S T .No: Department Civil Service --- Rudget Unit 582 Date 9/2n17fi Action Requested: _Reduce hours of Administrative Aide-CETA position #582-760-02 from 40/40 to imn- Proposed effective date: 9/29/76 Explain why adjustment is needed: To accomodate a part-time employment opportunity chie•h will Pnbance this CETA emolovee's ability to transition outside the County service. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: Coram.;. CO3.0 Counly 1. Salaries and wages: t;'t=(�j � 2. Fixed Assets: (List .items and coat) $SEP 2 i976 office of Estimated totalU:1ty Ad &stra ar Signature Deparlamen Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: September 21, 1976 Classification and Pay Recommendation Decrease hours of Administrative Aide-CETA position #02. Study discloses duties and responsibilities remain appropriate to the class of Administrative Aide-CETA. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by decreasing the hours of 40/40 Administrative Aide-CETA position #02 to 37/40, Salary Level 262 (819-996). Can be effective September 29, 1976. Person l Director Recommendation of County Administrator .Date: Sentember 29, 1976 Recommendation of Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission approved, effective September 29, 1976. 00 County Adm-;nistrbtbr Action of the Board of Supervisors SEP 2 6 i976 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSON Cotaty Clerk Date: SEP 2 81976 _ g . � . p ° Z MWag K Neideld APPROVAL os thiA adjust conatitotes an Apprcopki,ati.on AdjubUent and FMOnnet Reeotnti.on Amendment. o+ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28, , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Appropriation Adjustments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appropriation adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 2976• I hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and cameo copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28ttdoy of September 1976 J. R. CILS.SQN, Clerk BYX)—Z li Do"Clerk . Doroth MacDonald 00030 H-2431761Sm i CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT 1. DEPARTMENT OR BUDGET UNIT MEDICAL SERVICES RESERVED FOR AUDITOR•CONTROLLER'S USE Card Special Fund ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM' Decrease Increase Code Quantity) Budoetllnit Obiect Sub.Acct. (CR X IN 663 01 1 1003 540-7751 Typewriter $450.00 01 1 1003 540-T751 Calculator 213.00 01 1 1003 540-7752 .Desk 122.00 01 1 1003 540-7"754 Radial Saw 470.00 Al 8?B.oa 01 ••-r 1003 990-9970 Reserve for Contingency 990-9970 Appropriable Revenue 878.00 S+1�z3i a P/-c7`essio�a l Setvic�s ��,ao Y Ccnira C�-5:a County RECEIVED S ., i9/o Office of County A*ririistrator PROOF _C_oma.__ _K.P__ _VER.� 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(If capitol outlay,list items and cost of eoch) TOTAL ENTRY To request funds for a typewriter for Mental Health Dote Description Residential Drug Treatment Programs in accordance with State of California, Department of Health letter of May 5, 1976, copy attached, and to request funds for the other three items approved per Department of Health letters of August 12 and August 24, 1976, copies attached. APPROVED: Sl&NA "ES DATE Purchases must occur prior to 9/30/76. Reimbursement is AUDITOR_ 78 for 70% of cost. CONTROLLER: SEP I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: SupenL-ars Iienzty, DIA". Worla,ttp. gc�. LLz..1,_: . 00031 SEP 2 8 1976 NO.- , on J.R.OLSSON CLERK �# �uz.d 'V0`) , Medical Director 9/13176 Mt/ �• Depot + Aetc Srgnotu,e orge Degnan M.D Tufa Date pprop.Adi. {M 129 Rev.2/66) Journal No. •See Instructions on Reverse Side . r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES 2500 Alhambra Avenue Mortir_z,California To: Arthur G. Will Dare: September 13, 1976 County Administrator C. L. Van Harter, Directo" From: Human Resources Agency Subject: Appropriation Adjustment George Degnan, M.D. Medical Directory�q The attached proposed appropriation adjustment is to request funds for the procurement of capital equipment for the Mental Health Division in accordance with the attached correspondence. The use of this equipment would be associated with detoxification and residential drug treatment service programs and is partially financed through a grant related there to. (See Board Order of November 4, 1975 - Contract 29-X02-3) We recognize the severity of present funding shortages and therefore request your advice in this matter. Also, please note that if approval is favorably considered that procurement action (encumbrance) for these items must occur prior to September 30, 1976, or finds will be lost, since the contract period expires on that date. GD:WT:kkc cc: Auditor-Controller 00032 A-50 51 11j7_ AGFNcT EDMUND G.BROWN M.Goa no► DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 714 V S:7Fc-T 1y''?'•i} SACR1rt2NTO.CAUFORNia 95973 �xjJ August 24,1976 • Contra Costa County Medical Services Ir. Jerry 16chols— Program Coordinator 25M Ahabra Avenue Iyas t=nez,' CA 94553 Dear Mr. IrLchols: Ooh ICT NCS 75-- 53687 Ile have reviewed your letter, dated August 19,1976, regarding the purcbase of one (1) P,zdial Saw, for S.,m.00. In our oszginal authorization letter, dated August 12,1976, ve deniled the purchase of this item of equipment. Upon receipt of yv.zr letter of jastificati.on, we wish to reconsider our decision. Therefore, you are authnri.zed to purchase this item of equipment at a cost ' not to exceed $470.00. Please forward the necessary information for the =rpose of Federal ta&ging at your earliest possible convi.ence, to include the price, serial rrsmber, description, etc. ?f you need any further assistance, please contact our office at (916) 322-6680. _ Sincerely, ._ Ifi.chael Qasson. Contracts Administration Drug Abuse Services Section oil00(033 STATE OF CALOOENIA—HEAVIN AND WELFARE AGENCY EDMUND G.AROVIn it,Cn.r DEPARThIENT OF HEALTH -� ?Lt P SVIET Y E`1 93514 19�`� 322--65M August 12, 1976 s Mr. Jerry B. Nichols, Program Coordinator Contra Costa County t•Sedical Services E 2500 Alhambra Avenue f Martinez, CA 94533 � s Dear Jerry: RE: contract 75-53657 # We have received your letter dated August 9, 1976, requesting a transfer of E funds from the line item for House Aids to Facility Management Services. You are authorized to make the following changes 2-n your budget. tt State CateVory Total Hatch Share Line 7, House Aids $6707 $ 333 $4175 State 3 Category Total batch Share Idne 1, Facility Management $31:333 $7,933 $23:500 I Contract Please make the necessary changes in your budget to reflect the above figures. 1 Your August 9th letter also contains a request for authorization to purchase certain iters of equipment. In addition to the items authorized in the letter i of XAy 5, 1976, you are authorized to purchase the follocdng items. Calculator (1) $ 00 Desk 122.00 Desk Chair (1) 107.00 ` Machine Stand (1) 121.00 Storage Unit (1) 41.00 Total Request $ 604.00 Amt. Authorized 5-5-76 1969.00 1 Equipment Total.' $2573.00 s Radial Sax (1) -0- Unauthorized s 00034 � ._._ .win'... ....�.+ .. .. 3 �..... .......�4. ai0:f��w-M[w[su AN W.11.41 .10 1 1 � EDMUND G.noWN m.C-...... _�— ;1Y.ENT OF HEALTH ;,4 . SI 11T - V&. 106 CALIF00%. (916) 322-466sa • - 113Y 5, 1976 . . _ cC702 . . Jerry B. Nichols Program Coo:dirator Contra Costa County 2,dical Services 2= Alhambra Avenue Haritinez, CA, 94553 . Dear Jerzy: ' We have reviewed your equipment request, dated April 29, 1976 and ' authorize you to pu.cbase the follo-w-Ing iters: Quantity Item Cost - 1 File S 98.00 1- Bookcase 76.00 - 1 Desk "2114-.00 c-77fv 1 Chair (Deek) 149.00 :)k;-7d.? 3 Chai_+-s 196.00 i •7 1 stove 736.00 Typelvite"I 450-00 G - 77.f/ *ie hereby authorize the p•.LTchase of 1 typewriter at a cost not to _ exceed $,50.00. This price of eeui.--ent mot be pureiased exclusively with 420 funds and to ad according. Men you have received 211 the above items, please serd us a detailed - description (:Uicludirg Serial No. Firl Ko.,-etc.) of each item for the purpose of Federal identificatlen procedures. If yon have any further gtestix s, please contact our office at (916) 322-6680- Sincerely, KichEal L. Glasson Contracts tdrinistration ' Drug Abuse Services Section cc: Gary Baysmore 71�o Or 035 : C CONIMA CaTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT t. DEPARTMENT 0RBUDGET UNIT RESERVED FOP AUCtTOWCONTROLLER•S USE ce:o3 Special ACCOUNT 2. OBJECT OF EXPENSE OR FIXED ASSET ITEM• Inereose G_'r Q�. !irv) Fund BadaerUnit Obiecr ]ub Acct. Decrease CR X It! 66) 01 1005 535-2477 Educational Supplies F Courses $180,000 01 1003 585-2310 Professional & Personal Service $180,000 I e'ROOF CDRp-__ _K P._ _Y_E_R._ 3. EXPLANATION OF REQUEST(IF capital outlay,list items and rosr of each) TOTAL ENTRY To transfer funds from Professional & Personal Date Description Services to cover costs of the CETA, Title I Individual Referral Program, Vocational Training Agreements. APPRGVED: S7GNATJ=ES DATE AUDITOR— O;.t S;;um 8M SEP 2176 CO�ITP.OLI ER: C._ ~!1 COUNTY BOt,RD OF SUPERVISORS ORDER: YES: Kenny. Dias. Mmluny. I='mesa. L:.2�chci.f NO ��ftxLan SEP 2 & 1976 00036 J k OLSSON 1,l:. m ode;c�:d CLERK n •L ,DirectorH.R.A. 9/17/7f, Lvpul' k I Claude Lslirff2M Marter Title Or.. Avprop.Adi. s0/D i M 129 Rev.2/68) Joumal No. -See hestrnction er/erse Side r - - .z Y f , r r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 1 of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE: OF CALIFORNIA r i In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa Count}' ) RESOLUTION NO- 7611,46 ) i WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for addition of escape assessments; NO1,6, THE RE17ORI., BF: IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is directed to add the following escape assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained by audit of the assessee's records that the assessee failed to report accurately taxable tangible property, to the extent that this failure caused the assessor not to assess the property or to assess it at a lower valuation than i he would have entered upon the roll had. the propertybeen reported accurately; therefore, that portion of the property not reported should be assessed as escaped assessment pursuant to Section 531.4 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; and interest on taxes thereon should be added in accordance with Section 506. Orville 0. Links 3458 Alt. Diablo Blvd. Lafayette, CA 94549 Class Assessed Code-Assmt.x For Year Property Valuation 02002-8106 1972-73* Personal $3,31() ' 14010-8016 1972-73* Personal 8,700 Assessee has been notified. I *Assessee has waived statute of limitations. I , 1 R. 0. SEATON, Assistant Assessor t9/24/76 1 Adopted by th=Docrd on...... i i cc: G. Giese Auditor Tax Collector ' ON)) ?6/4116 Page 1 of 1 , 1 f t r I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COnTY, STATE OF CA-LIFORNIA In the matter of Char-gas ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County RESOLUTION HO. 76/847 i . 1 MAS, the County Assessor havin- filed with this Board requests for corrections of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; jMOW, Tri5FOR.=, BE IT RESOLVED that the Coxnty Auditor is i authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained f ron the assessment roll and from I papers in the Assessorts Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defacts in description and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected as stated below. 3 Board Resolution No. 76/795, adopted on September 7, 1976, erroneously imposed penalties on esca_oa assessments. Therefore, the Resolution should be rescinded. I hereof consent to the above changes and/or corrections: E. F. thiNAF:A, Assessor JOHN B. Mft.USEIN, County Counsel t/9-22-76 Copy to: Assessor (Rodgers) By Auditor Deputy Tex Collector Adopted by the Board on SEP 2 8 1976 CERTIFIED COPY I cerdfy that this is a full, true k correct copy of the ortgisal document wbicb is on f f*In toy OMM and that it was vi sed k adopted by the Board 01 Supervisors of Contra Costa Count. California, on the date shorn. ATTEST: J. IL OLSSOti, County Clerk&es•offIclo Clerk of satd Board of.SupetTlwrs by Dee ty Clerk. - ,a SEP 2 8 1976 Paoe 1 of 1 RESOLUTION: 110. 705/847 00038 CERTIFIED COPY I certify that Hats is a full, true & correct copy of the original document which is on file in my office, and that it was passed k adonted by the Hoard of Supervisors of Contra Costa Count?. California, or the date shown. ATTEST: J. R oLSSoJi, County Clerk&ezofflcto Clerk of said Board of Supervisors by Deputy Clerk. o SEP 2 81976 It; THE BOk;M OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA C010TY, STATE OF CALIFORFIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/348 WF—ER.E.AS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for corrections of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; NOW, T_9-_E-1EFORE, 5E IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976--77 It has been aseertai-ted from the assessment roll 19ald from papers in the Assessorts Office khat was intendad and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 4985(a) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, any uncollected dclinquont penalty, cost, redemption penalty, interest, or redemption fee heretofore or hereafter attached due to -such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional at*ount was made within 30 days from the date the correction is entered on the roll or abstract record. The following veterans qualify for the disabled veteran's exemption in accordance with Section 20,.5 of tha Revenue and Taxation Coda. The exemption should be allowed as stated below. On Parcel No. 065-112-003-6, Tax Rate Area 01004, DAVID M. PARIC-R should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of X$2,812. The homeowner's exemption of X1,750 should be ramovad. On Parcel No. 087-051-021-1, Tax Rate Area 07013, CHARLIE C. - MR-RAY should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of $4,750. The homeowner's exemption of $1,750 should be removed. On Parcel No. 117-290-004-3, Tax Rate Area 02001, BEN J. M-7%4'rOT should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of $6,500. The homeowner's exemption of $1,750 should be rafnoved. On Pa'eel No. 133-201-009-7, Tax Rate Area 02001-, JOM.T W. 1-MBLEY should be allowed the disabled voteran3' exemption in the amount of $10,000. The homeowner's exe^lption of $1,750 should be removed. On Parcel No. Tax Rate Area 79108, PHILIP R. B[ISH should be allowed th•, disabled veterans' exer.ntion in the amount - of $10,000. The h�Macwner's ^xe^:ption of 81,?50 o6ul, h-- zemoved. E. F. WA:.aEA, Assessor Pa;e 1 of 2 RESOLUTTO-N NO. 76/848 00039 : 1 On ?areal No. 169-130-011}-7, Tax Rate rraa 114026, BARNEY L. BRUN, JR., should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the am3u.nt of $10,000. The homeowncr'a exemption of $1,770 should be rarsv3 . On ?areal No. 171-230-003-5, Tax Rate Area 09045, JOSEPH P. GLEASON should be allotted the disabled veteranst exemption in the amount -of X8,650. On Parcel No. 189-160-005-6, Tax Rate Area. 09000, First Walnut Crea _ Hutual, c/o ROBERT W. shouli be a.11owcd the d_sablsd votcrans' exemption in the x-onnt of $7,200. The homeowner's ex3n—.}ion of 81,750 should be renprsd. On parcel 2:o. 268-05E-018-2, Tax Rate Area 830041 , JOSEPH E. SPOTT should b3 alloriad the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of $9,200. On Parcel No. 1102-161-015-1, Tax Rate Area 06000, WIL IA:i E. ?FIST should be allowed th3 disabled veteranst exemption in the amount Of $6,200. The har:3owner's exemption or $1,750 should be removed. On Parcel No. 1131-251-019-3, Tart Rate Arca 08018, MAR-LIN D. EKSTROM should be glowed the disabled veterarn3' exemption in the amount of $10,000. On Parcel No. 523-042-020-9, lax. Rato Area 08001, BURLON R. ':?ZMILMSON should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of $5,600. On Parcel No. 529-070-001.,-5, Tax Rate Area 080013. RAYMOND H. BLASING_AP_J should be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption. in the amount of $6,82.5. FURTHER, clairants for the disabled veterans' exemption who filed the required affidavit subsequent to April 15, 1976, and whom the _Assessor has ascertained to be eligible should be allowed an exemption of the lesser of $8,000 or 80 percent of the assessed value pursuant to Section 276 of the Rev-nue and Taxation Code. The exemptions should be allot ad as stated below. On Parcel Nio. 016-010-007-9, Tax Rate u ea 58015, JAIMS, M. P_�LPS should ba allowed the disabled veterans' exervtion in the amount of $2,660. Tha homeowner's exemption of $1,750 should be removed. On Parcel No. 085-122-010-3, Tax Rate Area 07013, DANIEL I. MACAA.:,AY should' be allowed the disabled veterans' exemption in the amount of $3,►TO0. The homedwner's exemption of $1,750 should be removed. On Parcel No. 1*7-081-036-5, Tax Rate Area 02002, NIEL T. BOYLE should be .allowed the disabled vaterans' exemption in the amount of $8,000. The homeowner's 3xemntion of $1,750 should be removed. I hereby consent to the above . chances and/or corrections: :; N=ii , assessor JOHN B. C •?USF'!, Count.,., Counsel Copy to: As3essor (Roe;.ors1 3;; /! A•jaito^ Deputy Tax Collector % RGopted by the Bocfd on------S F 2 8 1976 PaE= 2 of 2 00040 t It: TK BOA-RD OF SU?ERVIS03S OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE: OF CALUOR%M1 In the Flutter of ChanZes 1 of the Asscss:T ant Roll ) of Contra Costa County ) RESOLUTION NO- 76/849 ) WMRP_AS, the Counts Assessor having filed with this Board raze-sts for corrections of erron?Jus assessments, said requests having been consented to by County Counsel; VOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVFJ that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been a3etr road from the assessncnt roll and from papers in the -lssessor's Office what was intsrded and what should have been assessed_: and, therefore, pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831, the followinc; defects in description and/or form and cl=rival errors of the Asst�ssor on the roll should be corrected. Further, in accordance with Section 1F985(a) of the Revenue and. Taxation Cone, any uncollected delinquent penalty, cost, redemption penalty, inter Jst, or rc^4enntion --,e heretofor- or hereafter attached due to such error should be canceled upon the showing that payment of the corrected or additional ^count was -:ldc within 30 days from the data the correction is entered on she roll or abstract record as it was impossible to cor-.plete valid procedures in;tiated prior to the delinquency data. It has been ascertained fry papers in the Assessor's Office that pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 275(e), claimants for the homeowner's f,roperty 'tax excmption who filed a claim subsequent to April 155, 1976, and whop the Assessor has ascertained to be eligible should b6 allowed $1,),00 or 80% of the assessed value, as stated below: Parcel NLLmber Tax Rat•' Area A11�:: %s3?S.^.C<' 115-041-0071-9 0200? S-L00 Stone, Brenton S. & Barbara N. 130-270-007-3 79038 1 =_00 Adams, R. I. & Bernadine 139-2`31-006-3 09019 �s1h01 _Harrison, Russell J. & Cynthia A. 15~-0$2-026-8 05011 $1400 Floras, Saldomaro A. & Victoria 171,-070-008-1 98003 $11Y00 Klop, Stanley R. & Sandra K. 18�-L4'- 20-019 980`02 1400 Br ,u::back, Ronald J. 2- flarlene K. 208-100-032-u 660.1; �1►100 Elder, David d. Sr. A. Jane t J. 2^a-291-019-5 63101 $lh00 Love!!, Clifton. C. & 'Perri Jean 2►,;-i070-J05-5 14012 $1400 ')ell?r!ar, Fav: M. 9; Janell 14. 36':-091-02?-? 06: X1400 3obh, =rv-n_• G. !11r_-'S1-011-U 110v, 1L,0_ 7;Izl, Theresa Hlah�,c, John & Theresa Davi:i O'Keil PaEce 1 of 2 RcSOLUT IO:. ::O. 76/349 00041 Parcel Nu.-ihpr Tax Rate Aras 11,11aw &^,sessee 26-262 00 — 5UO" 00 Swisher, Stephan A. 5C0-O8O-023-4 0,000 1141 " "lull A. & Alana V. 501-510-011-; 03000 ZI,00 Chiu, Lisng-Tai George & Nancy 502-280-005-3 03000 1400 Castro, Thomas Franklin 505-032-001-8 030 Zti00 Blua, �eancr V. 540-n-,0-008--r, 08001 _ 1400 Shields, nn The following assessees were erroneouzly not mailed .a homeowner's exemption clai:: form. As the Assessor did not Conform to Section 250.3 of tha Raven:e and Taxation Code, the exenption should be allowed. Parcel Nun-ber Tax Rate Area Allays Ass�sssee 06 -1 1-033 0, 0100Y X17 0 George, Bruce E. & Lynda A. T- hereby consent to the above Ow changes and/or corrections: E. F. WANILKA, Assessor JOHN B. CLAUSUM, County Counsel t/9-21-76 CODZ to: Assessor (Rodgers) By Auditor Deputy Tax Collector Adopted by the Beard on-...SEP 2 8 1976 CERTIFIED COPY 1 certiry that thla is a full. true r the original document which f3 0o file correct copy of Slu 11 tray passed & adopted by the Board of the date rs of Ani costa Couj. itntv. California, o0 Clerk&ez-officio Clerk oo said Board Of S,. County. by Deputy Clerk. Hoard or i eAi ors on SEP 2 81976 p;age 2 of 2 00042 IN TfC, BOAP.D OF SUPERVISORS OF S-rA .2 OF CAL3':OR-iTk In the ::atter of Changes } of the Assessment Roll } HESOLUTIOfi .'•iO. 76/850 of Contra Costs County ) :vn2.yS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requesta for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, 1—:=FCR:., BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorised to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976 - 1977 it has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office groat was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 11831 of the California .Revenue and laxation Code, the following defects in descriptions and/or form and clerical errors of the Assessor on the roll should be corrected; and in accordance with Sections -1.i906 and 5096 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the assessee may file a claim for cancellation or refund; SLice the boats listed below ware not owned by the assessees on the lien date, these assessments should be corrected to zero value. Original Code and Assessed Assmt. No. Assessee Boat No. Value 05001-0.321 '•Iarvin Xendenhall CP 3135 AZ 300 11017-0002 Celestino Cordova CF 7229 AG S 0 66092-0015 Donald R. 'filler CF 99611 3P S 090 79005-0036 Joseph Gonzaga OF 6282 4D 270 Since the situs of each of these boats has been determined to be another county where they have been assessed for the 1976-77 fiscal year, ties assess:.^-ents should be corrected to zero vaiue. 08U01-1111 Stefan ?aciotti 529-869 X4,300 6u+:'�7-00113 Ralph E. Burrows CF 1357 =F. Y2,220 S_033-0� 'Wayne Thowpson C:` 10949 BP 51,500 �. is aII8�9 �+ linty Assessor cc: Assessor (Giase) Au:!itor Tax Collector 00043 RE-SOLUTION M. 76/350 Page 1 of 2 1 LM The following assessments should be corrected to zero value as they are duplicates of the correct assess .ents listed below. Original Code and Assessed Correct Code Assnt. it.. Assessee Boat No. Value and issmt. No. 09000-0001.E Lelly J. Cowden OF 4!189 .G $ 190 05001-0312 82020-0017 Xenneth Rawlings XX 0243 44'1,200 82020-0020 FURTH—M, for the 1967-58 fiscal year Code 01000 Assessment ;Yo. 0505, boat OF 3572 BF is erroneously assessed to Howard Fertado, assessed value . 150. Since this boat was sold prior to the lien date, this assessment s:o ld be corrected to zero value. A;D FURTB✓R, the following assessments were erroneously assessed on boat CF 5919 BF to :ia;ne "Thompson. Since the situs of the boat has been determined to be Sacramento County where it has been assessed for the following fiscal years, these assessments should be corrected to zero value. Original Fiscal Code and Assessed sear Assmt. No. Value 1973-74 62035-1426 $1,240 1974-75 62038-0521 51,220 1975-76 82038-0453 41,220 Y hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections. JOS: B. CUUSEX 1 " Cour_ C •nsel iYanaks epu County Assessor SEP 38 1976 Adopted by thL Board on.___........ CERTIFIED COPY 1 cortffp that this b a :nit. true& correct copy of t> ori:fttaf du•-anent u•hfch t on we to m1 alace. ar..! efl�t u ma; pa.srd r• _doArd by rhr Roan: of Sn:rr+isary n: t:ontr- Crates Coanfy. Caufornis. an thl datO xho-n.. ATT':T: J. P. 01.;801. eo-:tty Clerk&exoMicio Cterk of said laud of supenLors by U-puty Cie-,c. as SEP 2 n 1976 00044 Fa iie 2 of 2 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Changes ) of the Assessment Roll ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/851 of Contra Costa County ) WHEREAS, the County Assessor having filed with this Board requests for correction of erroneous assessments, said requests having been consented to by the County Counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Auditor is authorized to correct the following assessments: For the Fiscal Year 1976-77 It has been ascertained from the assessment roll and from papers in the Assessor's Office what was intended and what should have been assessed; and, therefore, pursuant to Section 4831 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the following defects in description and/or form and clerical errors of the assessor on the roll should be corrected; and, FURTHER, in accordance with Section 4986 (a) (2) the County Auditor should he directed to cancel all or any portion of any tax, penalty, or costs on that portion in error as if it has been levied erroneously. In Tax Rate Area 66059, the following parcels assessed to White Gate Homeowners Assoc. , have been erroneously assessed with Land values, due to Assessor's error in enrolling these assessments• on properties which are designated as common areas in a planned unit development, the values of which are prorated to other prop- erties in accordance with Section 2188.5 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Therefore, the following assessments should be corrected by removing the land values as shown: d&&/ � R. 0. SEATON Assistant Assessor t9/15/76 Copies to: Assessor (Mrs. Fettle) Auditor Tax Collector Page 1 of 2 ^L,1T1C t =0. 76/351 OU04 r �r< y, t. *r Assessed Value Parcel Number From To 194-140-015-0 Land S 375 S-0- Total 37 -O- 194-140-017-6 Land $3,500 $-0- Total T3,—SO 0 T--O- 194-160-023-9 -0 194-160-023-9 Land $2,000 $-0- Total 5-2,160-0 -0- 194-170-021-1 Land S 475 $-U- Total 475 --0-- I -0-I hereby consent to the above changes and/or corrections: R. 0. SEATON JOHN Y�AYS N, County Counsel Assistant Assessor t9/15/76 By --- -• . .. Deputy .SEP 2 8 191 Adopted by the Board on... Page2of2 pie. f IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATS OF CALIFORNIA In the Hatter of Approving FAA Grant ) Agreement for Acquisition of ) Runway 19R Clear Zone Land for ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/852 Buchanan Field Airport, Concord, ) California. ) ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA AS FOLIM: 1. That the Board hereby accepts the Grant Offer of the United States of America through the Federal Aviation Administration, under the Airport Development Aid Program, in the mazionm amount of $319,500 to be used for Project No. 6-06-0050-03 to acquire Runway 19R Clear Zone Land (approximately 28 acres) for the development of Bachanan Field Airport. 2. That the Chairman of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to sign the Statement of Acceptance of said Grant Offer (entitled Part II - Acceptance) on behalf of the County, and the Clerk of the Board is hereby authorized and directed to attest the signature of the Chairman and to impress the official seal of Contra Costa County on the aforesaid Statement of Acceptance. 3. A true copy of the Grant Offer referred to herein is attached hereto and made a part hereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED on September 28, 1976. cc: Federal Aviation Administration (via Airport Manager)_ County Administrator County Auditor Public Works Director Airport Manager R3SOLUTION NO. 76/852 00047 Page 1 of 14 pages DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION GRANT AGREEMM Part 1-Offer Date of Offer September 23, 1976 = Buchman Field Airport Project No. 6-06-0050-03 Contract No. DOT-FA76wE-3+62 TO: Contra Costa County, California (herein referred to as the"Sponsor") FROM: The United States of America(acting through the Federal Aviation Administration,herein referred to as the "FAA") WHEREAS,the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA a Project Application dated August 23,-v76 .for a grant of Federal funds for a project for develop- ment of the Buchanan Field Airport(herein called the -Airport"), together with plans and specifications for such project,which Project Application, as approved by the FAA is hereby incorporated herein and made a part hereof;and WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for development of the Airport (herein called the "Project")consisting of the following-described airport development: Land, clear zone, Ruau-ay 19R (approximately 28 acres as outlined in green on Exhibit A consisting of 10 parcels as listed on Project Acreage Estimate dated August 23, 1976) including relocation assistance and obstruction removal. all as more particularly described in the property map and plans and specifications incorporated in the said Project Application; FAA FORM 3100-13 PG.1 t10.111 SUPERSEDES FAA FORM 1632 PG_1 PAGE t 00048 Page 2 of 14 pages NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1701), and in consideration of (a) the Sponsor's adoption and ratification of the representations and assurances contained in said Project Application, and its acceptance of this Offer as hereinafter provided, and (b) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Project and the operation and maintenance of the Airport as herein provided, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay, as the United States share of the allowable costs incurred in accomplishing the Project: a. With respect to the costs to the Sponsor which are reimbursable under Section 211 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970: (1) for costs incurred on account of any displacement occurring after January 1, 1971, and prior to July 1, 1972, or after June 30, 1972, on account of any acquisition of real property occurring prior to July 1, 1972: (a) 100 percent of the first $25,000, and (b) 90 percent of the balance of the costs in excess of $25,000, and (2) 90 percent of the costs incurred on account of any displace- ment occurring after June 30, 1972, on account of any acquisition of real property occurring after June 30, 1972; b. 90 percent of all other allowable costs. This Offer is made on and subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer shall be (a) $13,500 for the cost to the Sponsor of providing payments and + assistance for displaced persons under subparagraph a of the foregoing paragraph. + (b) $306,000 for all other allowable project costs. I 2. The Sponsor shall: (a) begin accomplishment of the Project within sixty (60) days after acceptance of this Offer or such longer time as may be prescribed by the FAA, with failure to do so constituting just cause for termination of the obligations of the United States hereunder by the FAA; 00049 Page 3 of 14 pages J la) ?ls,.Juu ao& u,e cosi Lo she Sponsor oz p.o.iding paymenLs acid assistance for displaced persons under subparagraph a of the foregoing paragraph. + (b) $306,000 for all other allowable project costs. 2. The Sponsor shall: (a) begin accomplishment of the Project within sixty (60) days after acceptance of this Offer or such longer time as may be prescribed by the FAA, with failure to do so constituting just cause for termination of the obligations of the United States hereunder by the FAA; 00049 Page 3 of 14 pages (b) carry out and complete the Project without undue delay and in accordance with the terms hereof, the Airport and Airway Develop- ment Act of the Federal Aviation Administration (14 CFR 152) in effect as of the date of acceptance of this Offer; which Regu- lations are herein-after referred to as the "Regulations"; (c) carry out and complete the Project in accordance with the plans and specifications and property map, incorporated herein, as they may be revised or modified with the approval of the FAA. 3. The allowable costs of the project shall not Include any costs deter- mined by the FAA to be ineligible for consideration as to allowability under Section 152.47 (b) of the Regulations. 4. Payment of the United States share of the allowable project costs will be made pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 152.65-152.71 of the Regulations. Final determination as to the allow- ability of the costs of the project will be made at the time of the final grant payment pursuant to Section 152.71 of the Regulations: Provided, that, in the event a semi-final grant payment is made pur- suant to Section 152.71 of the Regulations, final determination as to the allow-ability of those costs to which such semi-final payment relates will be made at the time of such semi-final payment. 5. The Sponsor shall operate and maintain the Airport as Provided In the Project Application incorporated herein and specifically covenants and agrees, in accordance with its Assurance 20 in Part V of said Project Application, that in its operation and the operation of all facilities thereof, neither it nor any person or organization occupying space or facilities thereon will discriminate against any person or class of persons by reason of race, color, creed or national origin in the use of any of the facilities provided for the public on the airport. 6. The FAA reserves the riont to amend or withdraw this Offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the Sponsor. 7. This Offer shall expire and the United States shall not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the Project unless this Offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on or before September 30, 1976 or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing be the FAA. 8. The Sponsor will send a copy of all Invitations for bids, advertised or neaotiated, for concessions or other businesses at the airport to the appropriate Office of Minority Business Enterprise (OMiBE) representaive as identified by the FAA Regional Civil Rights Office. The Sponsor will disclose and make information about the contracts, contracting procedures and requirements available to the designated OMBE representative and minority firms on the same basis that such 00050 Page 4 of 14 pages information is disclosed and made available to other organizations or firms. Responses by minority firms to invitations for bids shall be treated in the same manner as all other responses to the invita- tions for bids. Compliance with the preceding paragraph will be deemed to constitute compliance by the Sponsor with requirements of 49 CFR 21 Appendix C (A) (1) M, Regulations of the Office of the Secretary of Transpor- tation. 9. It is understood and agreed that the Sponsor will provide for FAA employees adequate parking accommodations satisfactory to the Adminis- trator at all FAA technical facilities (Air Navigation and Air Traffic Control facilities) located on the airport. It is further understood and agreed that Sponsor will provide, without cost, adequate land for the purpose of parking all official vehicles of the the FAA (government and privately owned when used for FAA business) necessary for the maintenance and operation of the FAA facilities on the airport. Such land shall be adjacent to the facilities served. 10. It is understood and agreed that the Sponsor shall comply with the revised Administration requirements to FAR Part 152 as set forth in the May 31, 1974, issue of the Federal Register, Volume 39, No. 106. It is further agreed that the Sponsor shall comply with the assur- ances contained in FAA Forms 5100-100 (or 5100-101, as appropriate). 11. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto, that pursuant to FAR Part 152, Section 152.64, the FAA may by written notice terminate or suspend this Grant in whole or in part, or with- hold payment if it finds that the Sponsor has failed to comply with the conditions of the Grant or if it finds that continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results. 12. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto, that the sponsor shall comrp!y with the reporting requirements set forth in FAR Part 152, Section 152.66. 13. Assurance Number 18 of Part V of the project application incorporated herein is amended by Including at the end of the second sentence the following language: "Including the requirement that (A) each air carrier, authorized to engage directly in air transportation pursuant to Section 401 or 402 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, using such airport shall be subject to nondiscriminatory and substantially comparable rates, fees, rentals, and other charges and nondiscriminatory conditions as are applicable to all such air carriers 00051 Page 5 of 14 pages which make similar use of such airport and which uti- lize similar facilities, subject to reasonable classi- fications such as tenants or nontenants, and combined passenger and cargo flights or all cargo flights, and such classification or status as tenant shall not be unreasonably withheld by any sponsor provided an air carrier assumes obligations substantially similar to those already imposed on tenant air carriers, and (B) each fixed-based operator using a general aviation air- port shall be subject to the same rates, fees, rentals, and other charges as are uniformly applicable to all other fixed base operators making the same or similar uses of such airport utilizing the same or similar facilities; provision (A) above, shall not require the reformation of any lease or other contract entered into by a sponsor before July 12, 1976. A sponsor shall not require the reformation of any lease or other contract entered Into by a sponsor before July 1, 1975." 14. It is understood and agreed that no part of the Federal share of an airport development project for which a grant is made under the Air- port and Airway Development Act of 1970, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.), or under the Federal Airport Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), shall be included in the rate base in establishing fees, rates, and charges for users of the airport. 15. This project and all work performed thereunder is subject to the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Accordingly, (a) The sponsor hereby stipulates that any facility to be utilized in performance under the grant or to benefit from the grant is not listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities. (b) The sponsor agrees to comply with ail the require- ments of Section 114 of the Clean Air Act and Section 308 of the Federal Nater Pollution Control Act and all regulations issued thereunder. (c) The sponsor shall notify the FAA of the receipt of any communication from the EPA indicating that a facility to be utilized for performance of or benefit from the grant is under consideration to be listed on the EPA List of Violating Facilities. (d) The sponsor agrees that he will include or cause to be included in any contract or subcontract under the grant which exceeds 5100,000 the criteria and requirements in these subparagraphs (a) through (d). fl0052 Page 6 of 14 pages 16. The Sponsor hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be in- corporated into any contract for construction work, or modification thereof, as defined in the regulations of the Secretary of Labor at 41 CFR Chapter 60, which is paid for in whole or in part with funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee, or undertaken pursuant to any Federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee the following Equal Opportunity clause: (a) During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The contractor will take affirma- tive action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employ- ment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for train- ing, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive considera- tion for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin. (3) The contractor will send to each labor union or representa- tive of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' repre- sentatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (4) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of 24 September 1965, and of the rules and regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (5) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 1965, and by E rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, 0005 Page 7 of 14 paces or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascer- tain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (6) in the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the non- discrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be cancelled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further government contractors or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execu- tive Order 11246 of 24 September 1965, and such other sanc- tions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in f Executive Order 11246 of September 1965, or by rule, regu- lations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. ' (7) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence Immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor Issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of 24 September 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States. The Sponsor further aarees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment prac- tices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided that if the applicant so participating is a state or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the contract. The Sponsor agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and rele- vant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that It will furnish the 00051 Page 8 of 14 pages administering agency with the Secretary of Labor such information as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance. The Sponsor further agrees that it will refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of 24 September 1965 with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, government contracts and federally assisted construction contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be Imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or by the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part 11, Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the Sponsor agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings the adminis- tering agency may take any or all of the following actions: can- cel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part this grant (con- tract, loan, Insurance, guarantee); refrain from extending any further assistance to the Sponsor under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assur- ance of future compliance has been received from the Sponsor; or refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings. (b) State and local governments Intending to impose affirmative action hiring and/or training requirements of federally assisted construction already subject to federal minority hiring and/or training plans established pursuant to the Order shall submit such requirements to the Director prior to their inclusion in any federally assisted construction contracts. Such state or local government requirements will be deemed applicable to federally assisted construction contracts unless the Director, or in the case of an appeal of the Director's determination, the Assistant Secretary for Employment Standards, determines that such requirements are inconsistent with the Order or incompatible with the effective implementation of the federal minority hiring and/or training plan (either voluntary or imposed) in the area. The state or local government affirmative action hiring and/or training requirements shall not be included in federally assisted construction contracts until the Director, or in the case of an appeal, the Assistant Secretary, has had an opportunity to make a determination in accordance with this paragraph. The Director shall make his determination within 60 days of his receipt of the state or local government's submission, which should include the pertinent affirmative action hiring and/or training require- ments and supporting data. The Director may also request the 00055 Page 9 of 14 pages state or local government to supply information and data necessary for his determination. The Director's determination shall be communicated directly to the state or local governmental body by registered mail, return receipt requested, together, in the case of an adverse determination, with a notification of its right _ to appeal to the Assistant Secretary. The Director's determin- ation shall also be announced in a Federal Register notice, which shall also Indicate that the state or local government, and any other persons or groups affected by the Director's determination, including construction trades contractors, labor organizations, associations or other organizations of construction trades con- tractors and/or labor organizations, and minority community groups, may appeal such determination to the Assistant Secretary by requesting a hearing within 21 days of the publication of the Federal Register notice. Following this appeal period, if any requests for a hearing have been filed with the Assistant Secre- tary, the Department of Labor shall then designate an administra- tive law judge who shall conduct a hearing to make proposed findings and a recommended decision to the Assistant Secretary upon the basis of the record before him. The administrative law judge shall give reasonable notice of the opportunity to partici- pate in such hearing by registered mail, return receipt requested, to those requesting the hearing and shall also give reasonable notice of such hearing In the Federal Register to Inform all other persons, organizations, and other entities affected by the Director's determination of their opportunity to participate In the hearing. Each participant shall have the right to counsel and a fair oppor- tunity to present his case, Including such cross-examination as the administrative law judge may deem appropriate in the circum- stances. Within 80 days of the close of the appeal period for requesting a hearing, the Assistant Secretary shall make a final decision on the basis of the record before him, which shall con- sist of the record for recommended decision, the rulings and recommended decision of the administrative law judge, and the exceptions and briefs filed subsequent to the administrative law judge's decision. In determining whether state or local govern- ment affirmative action hiring and/or training requirements are inconsistent with the Order or Incompatible with the effective implementation of the applicable federal minority hiring and/or training plan in the area, at least the following factors shall be considered under this subparagraph; (1) the impact of the state or local government requirements on the successful implementation of the federal plan in the area; (ii) the minority population in the area to be covered by the state or local government plan; (III) the minority manpower utilization in the area construction industry, on a trade-by-trade basis; (iv) the availability of minorities for employment In the area construction industry; (v) the need and availability of training programs in the area con- struction Industry; (vi) the projected growth and attrition factors 00053 Paa.- 10 of 14 pages of the area construction industry in the near future; (vii) avail- able procedures to ensure that contractors, subcontractors and others are provided with notice and a full opportunity to contest allegations of noncompliance; and (viii) assurances that the state or local government minority hiring and/or training requirements are not Intended and shall not be used to discriminate against any qualified person on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. State and local governments are encouragea: to participate in the formulation and implementation of federal minority hiring and/or training plans consonant with the afore- mentioned criteria in areas currently without such plans; to enforce their fair employnert practices laws with respect to acts of discrimination affecting federally assisted construction and to assist the administering Federal agency in monitoring the com- pliance of contractors and subcontractors performing on federally assisted projects. For purposes of this subparagraph, "Assistant Secretary" means the Assistant Secretary for Employment Standards or his designee. 17. It is hereby understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the United States will not make nor be obligated to make any payments involving the areas outlined in green on the property map attached hereto and identified as Exhibit "A" until the sponsor has submitted evidence that it has acquired a fee title or such lesser property interest as may be found satisfactory to the FAA in and to said areas (or any portion thereof for which grant payment is sought) subject to no liens, encumbrances, reservations or exceptions which in the opinion of the FAA might create an undue risk of interference with the use and operation of the airport. 18. The Federal Government does not now plan or contemplate the construc- tion of any structures pursuant to Paragraph 27 of Part V - Assur- ances - of the Project Application dated August 23. 1976 and, therefore, it is understood and agreed that the sponsor is under no obligation to furnish any areas or rights without cost to the Federal Government under this Grant Agreement. However, nothing contained herein shall be construed as altering or changing the rights of the United States and/or the obligations of the sponsor under prior Grant Agreements to furnish rent-free space and/or such estates or interests in such land or rights in buildings for the activities specified in such agreements. 19. 5y its acceptance hereof, the Sponsor covenants and agrees that with respect to the areas outlined in green on Exhibit "A", It will clear any of said areas acquired in fee of any existing structures, prior to final payment under the project and that it will neither erect nor permir the erection of any permanent structures therein except those required for aids to air navigation or those which may be specifically approved by the FAA; further, if a lesser interest other than fee is acquired 00057 Page 11 of 14 pages In said areas, the Sponsor agrees it will clear said areas of any exist- ing structure or any natural growth which constitutes an obstruction to air navigation within the standards established by Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations; and further, the Sponsor covenants that It will control the subsequent erection of structures and control natural growth to the extent necessary to prevent the creation of ob- structions within said standards. 20. A. Pursuant to Sections 210 and 305 of the Uniform Relocation Assis- tance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646); Part 25, Regulations of the Secretary of Transportation, "Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisition for Federal and Federally Assisted Pro- grams" (49 CFR Part 25, 40 F.R. 41041); the Regulations; and other ap- plicable provisions of law -- the terms used in this paragraph to have the meanings assigned to them under such Act and regulations: 1. Sponsor will provide fair and reasonable relocation payments to displaced persons as required by Subparts E, F, and G of said Part 25; 2. Sponsor will provide relocation assistance programs for dis- placed persons offering the services described in Subpart D of said Part 25; 3. Sponsor will adequately inform the public of the relocation payments and services which will be available under Subparts D, E, F, and G of said Part 25; 4. Comparable replacement dwellings will be available, or pro- vided if necessary, within a reasonable period of time before any person is displaced; 5. Sponsor will fully comply with Subpart I of said Part 25; 6. Sponsor will adequately inform the public of the acquisition policies, requirements, and payments which will apply to the project with respect to any acquisition of real property to which said Part 25 and this aareement apply; 7. When approval of the FAA is required before Sponsor may proceed with any phase of the Project and that phase will cause the displace- ment of any person, sponsor will, prior to proceeding with that phase, provide the FAA with written assurances satisfactory to the FAA that: (a) Based on a current survey and analysis of available re- placement housing and in consideration of competing demands for that housing, comparable replacement dwellings will be available within a f reasonable period of time prior to displacement, equal in number to 6 the displaced persons who require them; and F 00059 Page 12 of 14 pages (b) The Sponsor's relocation program is realistic and is adequate to provide orderly, timely, and efficient relocation of dis- placed individuals and families to decent, safe, and sanitary housing available to persons without regard to race, color, religion, or na- tional origin with minimum hardship to those affected. B. With respect to every person who was displaced or from whom real property was acquired after 1 January 1971 and who would have been entitled to any payments or relocation assistance pursuant to the as- surances in this agreement had this agreement been in effect at the time of such displacement or acquisition, Sponsor represents and under- takes as the case may be: (1) That such person has received or will receive all the payments and has timely been or will be timely afforded all the assistance and advantages that would have accrued to him under the provisions of this paragraph had he been displaced or the real pro- perty acquired or his entitlements as such tenant accrued subsequent to the date of this agreement; and (2) that Sponsor has timely performed or will timely perform all acts that would have been or would still be required of the sponsor had the assurances of this paragraph been appli- cable at the times Identified In this paragraph. C. The obligation of the United States under this agreement to share In the allowable costs incurred by Sponsor under this paragraph shall be subject to all the pertinent and applicable provisions, limitations, and conditions contained in the laws and regulations referred to in this condition. D. That the United States shall not make nor be obligated to make any payment hereunder for land acquisition, or reimbursement for land acquisition, until the Sponsor has complied with the requirements of this condition,_ 00059 n _ Page 13 of 14 pages The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as hereinafter provided, and said Offer and Acceptance shall comprise a Grant Agreement, as provided by the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970, constituting the obligations and rights of the United States and the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and the operation and maintenance of the Airport. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed under the Project but in any event not to exceed twenty years from the date of said acceptance. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WESTE rtl?EG I ON ; By Chief, Airports District Office, SFO-600 Part H- Acceptance Contra Costa County, California does hereby ratify and adopt all statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Project Application and incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer and does hereby accept said Offer and by such acceptance agrees to all of the terms and conditions thereof. Executed this ..24h .................day of .Autv=4ex.......... 1976.... CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By . ..... ... ......... (SEAL) Tit a Chairman,,Baard o Supervisors. Attest: ..J..R...OLSSON.......... Title: .,.County_Clerk By { N. 'Pous 1 Deputy Clerk 08060 M-1 11�111 Pace 14 of 14 pages CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY �eII........ acting as Attorney for Contra Costa County, California therein referred to as the "Sponsor") do hereby certify; That 1 have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the proceedings taken by said Sponsor relating thereto, and find that the Acceptance thereof by said Sponsor has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof is in all respects due and proper and In accordance with the laws of the State of California, and further that, in my opinion, said Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof. Dated at IHartinez�,CA..this.28th.....day of PPA(Ml PF...A. 4 ..1116... .. . ..... r Title GEORGE yy,McCwRE } CUS:pry t corrri case COU.,, s k 1 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Abandoning of Dedicated ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/853. Roadway in Minor ) Date: October 5, 1976 Subdivision 252-72 ) Resolution & Order (Alhambra Valley Area) Abandoning County Road (S.& H. Code 5959) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: On August 31, 1976 this Board passed a resolution of intention to abandon the county highway described below and fixing September 28, 1976 at 10:55 a.m. in its chambers, Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for the hearing thereon, and ordered that the resolution be published and posted as required by Jaw, which was done as shown by affidavits on file with this Board. The hearing was held at that time and place, this Board hearing and duly considering evidence offered concerning the abandonment. This Board therefore hereby finds that the hereinafter described County Highway dedicated to public use, is unnecessary for present ' or prospective use, and it HEREBY ORDERED ABANDONED. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED by the Board on Septbmber 28, 1976. cc: Applicant Recorder Planning Commission Public Works Director Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Oakland Pacific Telephone Company, Oakland East Bay Municipal Utility District, Oakland Thomas Brothers Maps PJL:s RESOLUTION NO. 76/853 90N2' �f i EXHIBIT "A" A portion of the Rancho E1 Pinole, County of Contra Costa, State of California, being described as follows: The Offer of Dedication by Marilyn M. 'Fosse to Contra Costa County recorded February 11, 1974, in Book 7153, at page 610 of Official Records of Contra Costa County, said Offer of Dedication being the area within Parcels "A" and "B" shown as "AREA DEDICATED TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY" on the Parcel Map filed January 22, 1974, in Book 32 of Parcel Maps at page 6, Records of said County. s f M f 1 i 00063 v FAI 1 _ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) of Improvements and Declaring ) Certain Roads as County ) Roads, Subdivision 4508, ) Lafayette Area. ' RESOLUTION NO.76/851� The Public Works Director has notified this Board that improvements have been completed in Subdivision 4508, Lafayette area, as provided in the agreement heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4508 March 23, 1976 United Pacific Insurance Co. - U896785 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 132836 dated January 28, 1976) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. �D N- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described roads, as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4508 filed March 2S, 1976 y` in Book 183 of maps at page 7, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State J of California accepted and declared to be County Roads of Contra Costa County: Dalewood Drive 40/60/0.15 Dalewood Drive 36/56/0.09 Dalewood Drive 32/52/0.08 Fallen Leaf Terrace 32/52/0.15 PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. �D Originating Department: Public Works Land Development Division cc: Public-Works Director-Maintenance Recorder Public Works Director-LD Lindsay Homes Inc. P.O. Box 1437 Hemet, Calif RESOLUTION NO. 76/854 00064 i iz:•w _ -TO CLE"RIN BOLRD OF at o clocl- 14. SUPERYI SOBS Contra Corta County Record.; J. R. OLSS07, County Pecorder Tee • S Official BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA .COUNTY, CALUPRAIIA In the ?Satter of Accepting and Giving - ) RESOLUTION Or ACC??^}�2:CE Notice of Completion of Contract with ) dnd NOTICE 0_ COMPLETION L S L Equipment Rental DBA L S L Equipment Co. (C.C. sJj086, 3093) ro�ect o. 4711-4329--76 61 RESOLUTIOi: 110. 76/855 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Ccsta County ::ySOLViS T1U!T: The County of Contra Costa on July 26, 1976 contracted -with L b L Equipment Co ig 11nQ,,nT; Fleapant Trill r "1 ,..,; 01.5;,3 - (Name and 11CQTesS Of On Tractor) for reconstruction and widening of pavement and improvement of roadside drainage on Crow Canvon Road. Proiect No. 42114379-76 (660- -with American Fi del i ty Fire Insurance Company as surety, (i:ame of kiena_n g Company) for cork to be Performed on the grounds of the County; and The Publi n Works Director reports that. said work has been inspected and complies with the a=lroved plans, special provisions, and standard specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of September 13, 1976 Therefore, said work is accented as completed on=said date, and the Clerk: shall- -file-Yui th the -Oouaty-Recorder a copy of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract. - - PASSED _411D :M►'TED Oil September 28, 1976 CERTIFICATIONand IRI:IC.+TION I certify that the A e,,OiZS is a true and corgi ect CODY Of a "eS0111- tion --nd acceDYance duly adopted and entered on t^e mi.n Ites O- 7.' ., Buord's =eeting on the above date. I declarre under penalty of pL.rj1:7cy that t::e ferer;oina is rue and correct, - Datcd: J. R. OISSO;:, County Cle-'y fc at ;:artine:, California ex officio Clerk: of the Board )i:pu Ly cl er . D r- i a i ns'a ar. Pllh 1-*lc - f4JGt-40n- i 4F',- cc: Reccra a na re Turn _ Contractor Auditor 00065 rt•. 76/855 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO.-76/856 In the Matter of ComDletion ) of Improvements and Declaring ) Certain Roads as County Roads, ) Subdivision 4410, ) Danville Area. ) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that im- provements have been completed in Subdivision 4410, Danville area, as provided in the agreement heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4410 November 7, 1973 Argonaut Insurance Co. - 083222 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's DeDosit Permit Detail No. 108832 dated June 15, 1973) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described roads, as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4410 filed November 7, 1973 in Book 164 of maps at page 7, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are acdepted and declared to be County Roads of Contra Costa County: Allegheny Drive 36/56/0.17 Lehigh Valley Circle 32/52/0.31 Lehigh Valley Place 32/52/0.03 Silver Chief Place 32/52/0.04 Silver Chief Way 36/56/0.02 PASSED by the Board on September 18, 1976. Orig. Dept. : PW-LD cc: Public Works.-Director-Maint. Recorder Public Works Director-LD Kay Building Co. P.O. Box 1556 Burlingame, CA 94010 RESOLUTION NO. 76/856 0UQ65 t F IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans and ) Specifications for County Finance ) Building Air Conditioning Remodel, ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/$57 Martinez. ) (1003-186-7710-621) ) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for County Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, 625 Court Street, Martinez, have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the Engineer's cost estimate for construction is $20,000; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been ap- proved by this Board; and WHEREAS the Public Works Director has advised the Board that this project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class IA Categorical Exemption under the County Guidelines, and this Board concurs and so finds; and the Planning Director shall file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk: IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Speci- fications are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be re- ceived on October 26, 1976 at 11:00 a.m, and the Clerk of this Board is directed to publish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law, inviting bids for said work, said Notice to be published in the MORNING NEWS-GAZETTE PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on September 28, 1976. Originator: P. W. Dept. (Buildings & Grounds) cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller i County Administrator Director of Planning t RESOLUTION NO. 76/. 57 1 r 7 fi 00067 Vivi.bluli Ji. IVU (Advertisement) - Notice is hereby given by order of the Board of Super- visors of Contra Costa County, that Clerk of said Board will receive bids for the furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, transpor- tation and services for Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, 625 Court Street, ?Martinez, California The estimated construction contract cost (Base Bid) is 20,000.00 Each bid is to be in accordance with the Drawings and - Specifications on file at the Office of .the Clerk of the Board of - Super:isors, Room 103, County Administration Building, Martinez, California. The drawings and specifications may be examined at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building. Plans and specifications may be obtained at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, upon payment of a printing and service charge in the amount of $3.20 (sales tax in- cluded) which amount shall not be re-fundable. Checks shall be glade payable to the "County of Contra Cos-.7-, and shall be mailed to the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, California 94553. - Technical questions regarding the contract documents should be directed to the Building Projects Division. Their telephone number is (415) 372-2146. - Each bid shall be made on a bid form to be obtained at the Public ZVorI:s Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, and must be accompanied by a certified cashier's check or checks, or bid bond in the amount of the ten percent (10%) of the base bid amount, made payable to the order of "The County of Contra Costa" and shall be sealed and filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Bid proposals shall be submitted to the Chief Clerk of October the Board of Supervisors on or before 26 .1976 at 11:00 a.m. and will be ripened in public at the time due in the Board of Suver- visors' Chambers, Room.107, Administration Building, Martinez, Contra Costa County, California, and there-read and recorded. The above-mentioned bid security shalt be given as a guarantee that the bidder will -enter into a Contract if awarded the work, and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by the County if the successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Con- tract or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to do so by the Board of -F--I-.--L---E D gra Costa County. P 1ST 1976 Microfilmed with board orda� ILWSW aERK RDAgD OF SUKWLS(M TRA COSTA Co. -3- 00068 The successful bidder will be required to furnish a labor and 11aterial Bond in an anmojnt equal to fifty percent (50 ) of the Contract price and a Faithful Performance Bond in an amount equal to one hundred-percent (1001) of the Contract price, said bonds to be secured from a Surety Company authorized to do business in the State of California. Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to the Statutes of the State of California, or local law applicable thereto, the said Board has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and rates for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each type of workman or mechanic re- quired to execute the contract which will be awarded to the successful bidder. The prevailing rate of per them wages is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. In. all projects over $50,000 the Contractor shall be re- quired to submit for county approval an Affirmative Action Plan (see Division E). The said Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids or any portion of any bid and/or waive any irregularitq in any bid received. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a peziod of thirty _ days after the date set for opening thereof. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY By J. R. OLSSO County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Super- visors, Contra Costa.County, California By Deputy DATED: SEP 2 g 1976 - PUBLICATION DATES: • r - C Rev. 5/76 00069 -4- r 7 i I • (Bidder). DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Bid Form) BIDS VILL BE RECEIVED U►:TIL 25 th 'day of October, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. , in Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, . California, 94553. r (A) TO THE HONORABLE BOi%RD OF SUPERVISORS OF CON11UA COSTA COUNTY: i Gentlemen: The undersigned hereby proposes and agrees 'to furnish any and all required labor, material, -transportation, and services for Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, 625 Court Street, Martinez California in strict conformity with the Flans, Specificaticns, and other con- tract documents on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, First Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, Cali- fornia 94553, for the following sums; namely: BASE BID• Shall include all of the work for the construction. and com- _ pletion'of_all facilities therein. ' For the sum of: Dollars s (B) It is understood that this bid is based upon completion of the work . ,within forty-five (45) calendar days from and after the date of commencement. i _10- 00070 f IC is understood, with due .allowances nide for unavoidable delays, that if the Contractor should fail to complete the work of-the contract within the stipulated t imse, then, he _ ' • shall be liable to the Owner in the amount of Twenty-Five Dollars. $25.00 per calendar day for Each day said wort: remains uncompleted beyond the time for completion, as and for liq- uidated damages and not as a penalty, it being agreed and ex- pressly stipulated that it would be impractical and difficult to fix the actual amount of damage. (D) The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Plans, Specifications and other contract documents and the local conditions at the place _ where the work is to be done. (E) The undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the Board of Supervisors will not be re- sponsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the under- signed in malting up this bid. 00071 o - D7VISIOI7 C PROPOSAL. (Rid Faro) enntinued M _ The undersigned hereby certifies that this bid is genuine and not sham or collusive, or made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named, and that the undersigned has not directly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid, or any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from bidding, and that the undersigned has not in any manner, sought by collusion to secure for him- self an advantage over any other bidder. (G) Attached is a list of the names and locations of the place of business of the subcontractors. (H) Attached is bid security as required in the Notice to Contractors. []Cash t7 Bidders Bond a Cashiers Check OCercified Check (I) The following addenda are hereby acknowledged as being in- cluded in the bid: Addendum# dated Addendum# dated • Addendum# dated Fjsm . By Title Address Phone Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registra- tion of Contractors, Classification and License No. Dated this day of . 19 Rev.-5/76 00072 DIVISION C. PROPOSAL BID FORM cnntinued LIST OF SLTRCO%?RArTORS: (As required by Division B, Section 4, Paragraph (c)) (Substitution of listed subcontractors: See Division E., Section 6, Paragraph E.). Portion of Work Mame Place of Bidders e 000'73 SPECIFICATIONS FOR -13- r 000'73 SPECIFICATIONS FOR FINANCE BUILDING AIR CONDITIONING REMODEL 625 Court Street Martinez, California Prepared by Building Projects Division Public Works Department Contra Costa County September 1976 FI .L .ED BSEP i'g-1976 J. R.oLSSON aERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS tRA COSTA CO. B_ Prepared for Public Works Department - Contra Costa County Sixth Floor Administration Building . Martinez, California Miaofilmed with board Drier 00074 TABLE OF COftQITS DIVISION A. Notice to Contractors DIVISION B. Instructions to Bidders s 1 Section 1 Competence of Bidders t Section 2 Securing Documents Section 3 Examination of Plans, Specifications, and Site of Work Section 4 State and County Labor and Materials - Requirement i Section 5 Bidding Documents Section 6 Submission of Proposals Section 7 Withdrawal of Proposals Section 8 Public Opening of Proposals Section 9 Irregular Proposals Section 10 Competitive Bidding Section 11 Award of Contract Section 12 Special Requirements Section 13 Exectuion of Contract Section 14 Failure to Execute Contract DIVISION C. Proposal (Bid Form) DIVISION D. Articles of Agreement DIVISION E. Equal Employment Opportunity DIVISION F. General Conditions - Section 1 Definitions Section 2 Governing Laws and Regulations Section 3 Patents and Royalties Section 4 Contractor's Responsibility for Work and Public Utilities Section 5 Bond and Insurance Section 6 Subcontracting Section 7 Time of Work and Damages Section 8 Progress Schedule. Section9 Temporary Utilities and Facilities ! Section 10 Permits Section 11 Conduct of Work Section 12 Responsibility for Site Conditions Section 13 Inspection f Section 14 Rejection of Materials Section 15 Interpretation of Contract Requirements Section 16 Clarifications and Additional Instructions Section Y7 Product and Referene Standards Section 18 Materials, Articles,-.and Equipment Section 19 Shop Drawings, Descriptive Data, Samples Alternatives 00073 77,MENi A General Conditions continued b DIVISION F• les and Tests ?� Section 20 S, a Orders 1 c 'r.nn 21 Chang section 9 Temporary Utilities and. Facilities Section 10 Permits Section 11 Conduct of Work Section 12 Responsibility for Site Conditions Section 13 Inspection Section 14 Rejection of Materials Section 15 Interpretation of Contract Requirements Section 16 Clarifications and Additional Instructions . ` Section 17 Product and Reference Standards Section 18 Materials, Artieles,'.and Equipment Section 19 Shop Drawings, Descriptive Data, Samples { Alternatives 00077 DIVISION F. General Conditions continued Section 20 Samples and Tests Section 21 Change orders riot to Acceptance Section 22 Labor b the County p Section 23 occupancyY Section 24 Preservation Of and lcleaning Taxes Section 25 Payment tante Section 26 Acceptance and tiaiver to Claims Section 27 ;inal Pa} Section 29 Guarantees DIVISIGN G. Special Conditions DIVISION H. Technical Conditions Section 1 Plumbing, and %echanical Section 2 Electrical r 4 j 3 M1 E 1� V t4 00076 -2- DIVISION A. NOTICE TO COiURACTOR (Advertisement) • ® Notice is hereby given by order of the Board of Super- visors of Contra Costa County, that Clerk of said Board will receive bids for the furnishing of all labor, materials, equipment, transpor- tation and services for Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel 625 Court Street, Martinez, Ca i ornia The estimated construction contract cost (Base Bid) is $ 20,000.00 Each bid is to be in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications on file at the Office of -the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Room 103, County Administration Building, Martinez, California. The drawings and specifications may be examined at the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors or at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building. Plans and specifications may be obtained at the Public Works Departrent, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, upon payment of a printing, and service charge in the amount of $3.20 (sales tar, in- cluded) which amount shall not be refun6a le. Checks shall be :.lade payable to the "County of Contra Costa ", and shall be mailed to the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, administration Building, t±artinez, California 94553. Technical questions regarding the contract documents should be directed to the Building Projects Division. Their telephone number is (415) 372-2146. - Each bid shall be made on a bid form to be obtained at the Public Works Department, 5th Floor, County Administration Building, and must be accompanied by a certified cashier's check or checks, or bid bond in the amount of the ten percent (10`2.) of the base bid amount, made payable to the order of "The County of Contra Costa" and shall be sealed and filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. • Bid proposals shall be submitted to the Chief Clerk of the Board of Supervisors on or before I October 26 1976 at 11:00 a.m. and will be opened in public at the time due in the Board of Super- visors' Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Contra Costa County, California, and there read and recorded. The above-mentioned bid security shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a Contract if awarded the 3work, and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by the County if the successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Con- tract or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to do so by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 00011 -3- DIVISION A. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR (continued) The successful bidder will berequired percentfurnish of thelabor and tiaterial Bond in an amojnt equal to Yat Contract price aenta 10p1.)fofl thefCo tractBpricen said bondsetoabeto • one hundred-pert ( r 1. , „t-hnrivPti to do business in the State JJ.Lu the Board of Supervisorsionsor1beforeuU y`Leu "' ''ie Witei. ule,x o, and will be opened in - October 26 1976 at 11:00 a.m. Super- Visors' Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building,dh Board of Super- Costa County, California, and there read and recorded. Contra The above-mentioned bid security shall be given as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a Contract if awarded the and will be forfeited by the bidder and retained by Co the County if theork, successful bidder refuses, neglects, or fails to enter into said Con- requested or to furnish the necessary bonds after being requested to Co by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. do so 00017 -3- 9 DIVISION A. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR (continued) The successful bidder will be required to furnish a labor and Haterial Bond in an amojnt equal to fifty percent (507,) of the eContract price and a Faithful Performance Bond in an amount equal to one hundred-percent (100%) of the Contract price, said bonds to be secured from a Surety Company authorized to do business in the State of California. Bidders are hereby notified that pursuant to the Statutes of the State of California, or local law applicable thereto, the said Board has ascertained the general prevalling rate of per diem wages and rates for legal holidays and overtime work in the locality in which this work is to be performed for each type of wort*nan or mechanic re- quired to execute the contract which will be awarded to the successful bidder. The prevailing rate of per diem wages is on file with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Iu. all projects over $50,000 the Contractor shall be re- quired to submit for county approval an Affirmative Action Plan (see Division E). The said Board reserves the right to reject any and all bids or any portion of any bid and/or waive any irregularity in any bid received. No bidder may withdraw his bid for a period of thirty days after the date set for opening thereof. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY By J. R. OLSSDN County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of the Board of Super- visors, Contra Costa County, California By Deputy DATED: PUBLICATION DATES: 00010 Rev. 5/76 -4- CORRECTION SHEET The following corrections shall be made part of the Contract Documents and clarifies the Contract Documents as noted. Page 6. Section 3 (b) - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 6. Section 3 (c) - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 6. Section 4 (e) - Reference to "Section C" shall be corrected to "Division C". Page 7. Section 4 (c) - Reference to "Section 1 of Division E" shall be corrected to "Section 6 of Division F". Page 8. Section 11 - Reference to "Division E" shall be corrected to "Division F". Page 9. Section 12 - Reference to "Section D" shall be corrected to "Division D" Page 12. Paragraphs (f), (G), (H), and (I) shall be corrected to 5, 6, 7, and 8 respectively. Page 15. "Section E" shall be corrected to "Division E". Page 14, 14a, 14b, 14c. Division D - Change revision date at lower left hand corner-to Rev. 12/73. Page 21. Section E. Subcontractor's Certification (3); Delete paragraph beneath signature line requiring written authorization by County. Page 1. Table of Contents Division 8 - Instruction to Bidders.- Delete Section 4 and reduce by one all subsequent section numbers. 000179 -4a- G DIVISION B. INSTRUCTION TAi BIDDERS' The bidder shall carefully examine the instructions con- tained herein and satisfy himself as to the conditions with which he must comply prior to bid in submitting his proposal, and to the conditions affecting the award of contract. SECTION 1. COMPETENCE OF BIDDERS: (a) License: No bidder may bid on work of a kind for which he is not properly licensed, and any such bid received may be disregarded. (c) Bidders shall be experienced in the type of work for which they are bidding and shall, upon request of the County, submit to the County a written list of completed projects, with the name of the owner or contract officer indicated. SECTION 2. SECURING DOCUMENTS: (a) Drawings and Specifications may be secured at the place and for the deposit or fee as called out in the "Notice to Contractor", page 3. (b) The deposit, if called for in the "Notice to Contractor", page 3, is a guarantee that the Drawings and Specifi- cations will be returned in good condition. (c) The fee, if called for in the "Notice to Contractor", page 3, is a non-refundable payment to defray a portion of the print- ing and handl costs. SECTION 3. EXA41HATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND SITE OF THE WORK: (a) CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY: The bidders shall examine carefully the site of the work. and the plans and specifications therefor. He shall investigate and satisfy himself as to conditions to be encountered, the character, quality, and quantity of surface, and subsurface materials or obstacles to be encountered, the work to be performed, and materials to be furn- ished, and as to the requirements of the proposal, plans, and specifi- cations of the contract. Where investigations of subsurface conditions have been made by the County in respect to foundation or other structural design, and that information is shown in the plans, said information represents only the statement by the County as to the character of material which has been actually encountered by it in its investigation, and is only included for the convenience of bidders. Investigations of subsurface conditions are made for the purpose of design, and the County assumes no responsibility whatever in respect to the sufficiency or accuracy of borings, or of the log of test borings, or other preliminary investigations, or of the interpre- tation therefor. -5- Rev. 5,-'76 00080 _ _ ,,,, �a•�tf11t� p�8�p INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS (continued) There is no guarantee o: warranty, either express or implied, that the conditions indicated are representative of those existing throughout the work, or any part of it, or that unlooked for developments may not occur, !laking such informa- tion available to bidders is not to be construed in any way as a waiver of the provisions.of this article concerning the Con- tractor's responsibility for subsurface conditions, and bidders gust satisfy themselves through their own investigations as to the actual conditions to be encountered, (b) RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES: As part of the responsibility stated in subdivision (a) above, and without limitation thereon, the Contractor shall be responsible at his own cost for any and all work, expense or special precautions caused or required by the existence of proximity of utilities encountered in performing the work, in- cluding without limitation thereon, repair of any or all damage and all hand or exploratory excavation required. The bidder is cuationed that such utilities may include communication cables or electrical cables which may be high voltage, and the ducts enclosing such cables, and when working or excavating in the vicinity thereof, the special precautions to be observed at his own cost shall also include the following: All such cables and their enclosure ducts shall be exposed by careful hand excava- tion so as not to damage the ducts or cables, nor cause injury to persons, and suitable warning signs, barricades, and safety devices shall be erected as necessary or required. In connection with the foregoing, the bidder's attention is invited to Section 12 of Division E of these specifications. (c) DISCREPANCIES OR ERRORS: If omissions, discrepancies, or apparent errors are found in the plans and specifications prior to the date of bid Opening, the bidder shall submit a written request for a clari- fication which will be given in the form of addenda to all bid- ders if time permits. Otherwise, in figuring the work, the bid- ders shall consider that any discrepancies or conflict between drawings and specifications shall be governed by Section 15 of Divis!!-.. r �f these specifications. SECTION 4. BIDDING DOCUlENIS (a) Bids shall be made upon the special Proposal (Bid Form) (See Section C of this Specification), with all items completely filled out; numbers shall be stated both in writing and in figures, the signatures of all persons signed shall be in longhand. The com- pleted form should be without interlineations, alterations or erasures, no alternative proposals. Additional copies of the Proposal (Bid Form) may be obtained from those supplying these specifications. Rev. 5:75 -6- 00081 ._ i_ l SECTION 7. PUBLIC OPENING OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be publicly opened and read at the time and place indicated in the Notice to Contractors. Bidders or their authorized agents are invited to be present. SECTION 8. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS. Proposals may be rejected if they show any alter- ation of form, additions not called for, conditional bids, in- complete bids, erasures, or irregularities of any kind. If bid amount is ehanged after the amount is originally inserted, the change should be initialed. The County also reserves the right to accept any or all alternates and unit prices called for on the Bid Form and their order of listing on such form shall in no way indicate the order in which the bids may be accepted. SECTION 9. COMPETITIVE BIDDING: If more than one proposal be offered by any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association, or any combination thereof, under the same or different names, all such proposals may be rejected. A party who has quoted prices on materials or work to a bidder is not thereby disqualified from quoting prices to other bidders, or from submitting a bid directly for the materials or work. All bidders are put on notice that any collusive agree- ment fixing the prices to be bid so as to control or affect the awarding of this contract is in violation of the competitive bidding requirements of the State lav and may render void any contract let under such circumstances. SECTION 10. AWARD OF CUNTRACT: The right is reserved to reject any and all proposals. The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest responsible bidder whose proposal complies with all the requirements prescribed. Such award, if made, will be made within 30 days after the opening of the proposals. SECTION 11. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS The bidder's attention is invited to the following spec- ial provisions of the contract, all of which are detailed in the General Conditions (Division E) or other documents included in these specifications. (a) Bonds (b) Insurance (c) Liquidated Damages (d) Guarantee (e) Inspection and Testing of Materials (f) Facilities to be Provided at Site (g) Assignment of Contract Prohibited Rev. 5176 -8- 00083 j � r INSTRUCTION TO BIDDERS (continued) There is no guarantee o: warranty, either express or implied, that the conditions indicated are representative of those existing throughout the work, or any part of it, or that unlooked for developments may not occur. Making such informa- tion available to bidders is not to be construed in any�ayoas a waiver of the provisions.of this article concerning tt CC tractor's responsibility for subsurface conditions, and bidders must satisfy themselves through their own investigations as to the actual conditions to be encountered. (b) RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES- As part of the responsibility stated in subdivision (a) above, and without limitation thereon, the Contractor shall be responsible at his own cost for pans any and all work, expense or special precautions caused or required by the existence of proximity of utilities encountered in performing the work, in- cluding without limitation thereon, repair of any or all damage and all hand or exploratory excavation required. The bidder is cuationed that such utilities may include communication cables or electrical cables which may be high voltage, and the ducts enclosing such cables, and when working or excavating in the vicinity thereof, the special precautions to be observed at his own cost shall also include the following: All such cables and their enclosure ducts shall be exposed by careful hand excava- tion so as not to damage the ducts or cablesnor cause injury to persons, and suitable warning signs, barricades, and safety devices shall be erected as necessary or required. S In connection with the foregoing, the bidder's attention is invited to Section 12 of Division E of these specifications. I (c) DISCREPANCIES OR ERRORS: If omissions, discrepancies, or apparent errors are found in the plans and specifications prior to the date of bid opening, the bidder shall submit a written request for a clari- fication which will be given in the form of addenda to all bid- ders if time permits. Otherwise, in figuring the work, the bid- ders shall consider that any discrepancies or conflict between drawings and specifications shall be governed by Section 15 of Davis:-.. r :)f these specifications. SECTION 4. BIDDING DOCUMENTS (a) Bids shall be made upon the special Proposal (Bid Form) (See Section C of this Specification), with all items completely filled out; numbers shall be stated both in writing and in figures. the signatures of all persons signed stall be in longhand. The com- pleted form should be without interlineations, alterations or erasures, no alternative proposals. Additional copies of the Proposal (Bid Form) may be obtained from those supplying these specifications. Rev. 5.'75 -6- 00081 t (a) Bids shall be made upon the special Proposal (Bid Form) (See Section C of this Specification), with all items completely filled out; numbers shall be stated both in writing and in figures, the signatures of all persons signed shall be in longhand. The com- pleted form should be without interlineations, alterations or erasures, no alternative proposals. Additional copies of the Proposal (Bid - Form) may be obtained from those supplying these specifications. Rev. 5.'75 -6- 00081 r I s SECTION 6. BIDDING DOCUME.%'TS (_ontinued) (b) Bids shall not contain any recapitulation of the work to be done; alternative proposals will not be consid- ered, unless called for. No oral, telegraphic or telephonic proposals or modifications vi11 be considered. (c) List of Promo o_s�ed Subcontractors: Each proposal shall have listed rein the name anima dress of each subcon- tractor to wham the bidder proposes to subcontract portions of the work in an amount in excess of 1I of 1 percent of his total bid, in accordance with Chapter 2, Division 5, Title 1, of the Government Code. See Section 1 of Division E of these specifications for further reference to subcontractors. (d) Bidder's Sem: All bids shall have enclosed cash, a cashier's- epi eTc. cera i-ed check or a bidder's bond, as describe b_el-o;exeeuted as surety by a corporation au�ized to issue surety bonds in the State of California, made payable to "Contra Costa County" in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the amount of the bid. No bid shall be considered unless one of the forms of bidder's security is enclosed therewith. SECTION 5. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS: Proposals shall be submitted to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County at the place indicated on the bid proposal. It is the sole responsibility of the bidder to see that his bid is received in proper time. All proposals shall be submitted under sealed cover, plainly identified as a proposal for the work being bid upon and addressed as directed in the Notice to Contractors and the bid proposal. Failure to do so may result in a premature opening of, or a failure to open such bid. Proposals which are not properly marked may be disregarded. SECTION 6. WrMRAWAL OF PROPOSALS: Any bid may be withdrawn at any ti-se prior to the time fixed in the public notice for the opening of bids, provided that a request in writing, executed by the bidder or his duly authorized representative. for the withdrawal of such bid is filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. An oral, tele ra hic, or telephonic request to withdraw a bid pro�osZ� —not acre t�e. YEe vit�l of aaFiissli T not pr3ud cid r'fgl=t of a b••der to file a new bid. This article does not authorize the. withdrawal of any bid after the time fixed in the public notice for the opening of bids. Rev. 5/76 -7- 04 r ,i SECTION 7_ PUBLIC OPENING OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be publicly opened and read at the time and place indicated in the Notice to Contractors. Bidders or their authorized agents are invited to be present. SECTION B. IRREGULAR PROPOSALS: Proposals may be rejected if they show any alter- ation of form, additions not called for, conditional bids, in- complete bids, erasures, or irregularities of any kind. If bid amount is changed after the amount is originally inserted, the change should be initialed. The County also reserves the right to accept any or all alternates and unit prices called for on the Bid Fong and their order of listing on such form shall in no way indicate the order in which the bids may be accepted. SECTION 9. CDMPETITIVE BIDDING: If more than one proposal be offered by any individual, firm, partnership. corporation, association, or anq combination thereof, under the same or different names, all such proposals may be rejected. A party who has quoted prices on materials or work to a bidder is not thereby disqualified from quoting prices to other bidders, or from submitting a bid directly for the materials or work. All bidders are put on notice that any collusive agree- ment fiziaagg the prices to be bid so as to control or affect the awarding of this contract is in violation of the competitive bidding requirements of the State law and may render void any contract let under such circumstances. SECTION 10. AWARD OF CONTRACT: The right is reserved to reject any and all proposals. The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be to the lowest responsible bidder whose proposal complies with all the requirements prescribed. Such award, if made, will be made within 30 days after the opening of the proposals. SECTION 11. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: The bidder's attention is invited to the following spec- ial provisions of the contract, all of which are detailed in the General C<nditions (Division E) or other documents included in these specifications. (a) Bonds (b) Insurance (c) Liquidated Damages (d) Guarantee (e) Inspection and Testing of Materials (f) Facilities to be Provided at Site (g) assignment of Contract Prohibited Rev. 5176 -8- 00083 s SECTION 12. EXEarrI0N OF CONTRACT: The contract (example in Section D) shall be signed by the successful bidder in duplicate counterpart and returned within five (5) days of receipt, not including Satur- days, Sundays, and legal holidays, together with the Contract Bonds and Certificates of Insurance. No contract shall be binding upon the County until same has been executed by the Con- tractor and the County. Should the Contractor begin work in advance of receiving notice that the contract has been approved as above provided, any work performed by him will be at his own risk and as a volunteer unless said contract is so approved. SECTION 13. FAILURE TO EXECLFrE COMRAM Failure to execute a contract and file accept- able bonds and certificates of insurance as provided herein within 10 days, not including Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after the successful bidder has received the contract for execution shall be just cause for the annulment of the award and the forfeit- ure of the bidder's security. If the successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract. the County may award the contract to the second lowest responsible bidder. If the second lowest respon- sible bidder refuses or fails to execute the contract. the County may award the contract to the third lowest responsible bidder. On the rsilure or refusal of the second or third lowest responsible bidder to whom any such contract is so awarded to execute the same, such bidders' securities shall be likewise forfeited to the County. The work may then be readvertised or may be constrL.cted by day labor ` as provided by State law. Rev. 5/76 -9 _ 00081 d` y; Bidder . DIVISION C. PROPOy ld Farb BIDS ttiTZLL BE REGEIFED "TIL ?�th_ day of ber,1 .1976 . ' in Room 143, Administration Building, Martinez, Rev. 5/lb -9 - 00081 • Bidder • DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Bid Form)_ BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED UNTIL 26th day of October, 1976 . at 11:00 a.m. , in Room 103, Administration Building, Martinez, California, 94553. (A) TO THE HONORABLE BOtXD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Gentlemen: The undersigned hereby proposes and agrees 'to furnish any and all required labor, material, -transportation, and services for Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, 625 Court Street Martinez California in strict conioratity with the Plans, Specifications, and other con- tract docurents on file at the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, First Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, Cali- fornia 94553, for the following sums; namely: BASE BID: Shall include all of the work for the construction. and com- ' pletion'of_all facilities therein. For the sum of: Dollars ($ ) (B) It is understood that this bid is based upon completion 'of the work . within forty.-five (45) calendar days from and after the date of commencement. -10- • 00085 It is understood, with due allowances made for unavoidable delays, that if the Contractor should fail to complete the work of-the contract within the stipulated time, then, he . shall be liable to the.,Owner in the .mount of Twenty-Five Dollars $25.00 per calendar day for each day said work remains uncompleted beyond the time for completion, as and for liq- uidated damages and not as a penalty, it being agreed and ex- pressly stipulated that it would be impractical and difficult to fix the actual amount of damage. (D) The undersigned has examined the location of the proposed work and is familiar with the Plans, Specifications and other _contract documents and the local conditions at the place where the work is to be done. (E) The undersigned has checked carefully all of the above figures and understands that the Board of Supervisors will not be re- sponsible for any errors or omissions on the part of the under- signed in making up this bid. -11= 0008 DIVISION C. PROPOSAL (Aid Form) continued (F) The undersigned hereby certifies that this bid is genuine and not sham or collusive, or made in the interest or in behalf of any person not herein named, and that the undersigned has not directly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a sham bid, or any other person, firm, or corporation to refrain from bidding, and that the undersigned has not in any manner, sought by collusion to secure for him- self an advantage over any other bidder. (G) Attached is a list of the names and locations of the place of business of the subcontractors. (N) Attached is bid security as required in the Notice to Contractors. a a Cash r3 Bidders Bond t= Cashiers Cheek QCertified Check (I) She following addenda are hereby acknowledged as being in- cluded in the bid: Addendum# dated • Addendum# dated Addendum # dated Firm By Title Address Phone Licensed in accordance with an act providing for the registra- M tion of Contractors, Classification and License No. Dated this day of 19 Rev..5176 -12- 00087 accordance with an act Providing for the registra' Licensed in Classification and License No. �---- tion of Contractors' -------— 19�! Dated this dal of Rev..5176 Q 0 S DIVISION C. PROPOSAL BID FORM continued LIST OF StTM1%"MACT0RS: (As required by Division B. Section 4, Paragraph (c)) (Substitution of listed subcontractors: See Division E., Section 6, Paragraph E.). Portion of Work Hama Place of Bidders -13- 00085 DUMOlD. AWnCtES OF ACLEDOCT (Contract) C*XT%ACT (Co&etrnctlnn Air.....C) - (Contra Conte Cosety Standard per*) 1. rAN1A3..ZS. Three vasialLa are lac .v...Cad below by retetooce. (SS2.3) Far:iea: IPa►lit •racy) (cewcracrnr) (12) Effective Data: Is.& 54 for starting data.) 01) rim York: (54) Completion riu: . Iscrike not (a) or {b) 'ca).odar' or 'wetkia�) (a) by (data) (b) Wltbla Coles4&tlwrklat days Oro* sCattle$ data. - M) Liq.idated Damages: S err calendar day. (54) Tkbtic Agency's Agent: - (Sy) Contract Trice. S (for-uatc price contracts: *oro or less. in accordancewltb listahad auaneftles at watt bid Prices.) (Strike out pocestb.tical not vial it i&applicable.) N. S1CNAryNES t ACNNOWLF?CNEJr. Fabric Ane.c:, bye (Pro$ld.at or Chairman) (Secretary) Cowtraator, hereby alas Ackawledgisg aware&**& of and compliance with labor Ce4a 11861 concerning Workmen's Compen*attoo Law. by: GKg.ato official capacity in the basleass Nota to Contractor: (1/ rxeawt.ackwouladgwewt form below, and 12) if a:arlcra- Rias, at:ach a certified ca;f of tk* tsla:ra, or of tks resolution of the 6cari of Director* awtkoriai*g eteantion of chic contract sad of the bawds re4uirdd kerebu. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- State at Califnrala ) ACN9oWLE=PfXT (be Corporation, Consty of ) a*. Partnership, or ladl.14v30 The poteam(s) algal.& above fat Contractor. knew to ne 1* individual and best.*$. uyaclRy as ataCn4. par...ally eppeu*4 &.tore me today had ac►nawle4ga4 that beltb.v ..*crated (t and that the cosporatin. or partnership ....d above ...toted It. Daum: (SEAL) watery P.►:te ----------------------- __-------------------------------------------------r-._..-_- FOAM APrtotED: J. S. CLALSEb. Cuvaty Co.asci, t. ,_iD<Pwty (Page 1 of 4) Rev. 12172 -14- f _.s 00089 a� State of Calif...1. ) aa. ACKd0WLEVCrrXT (by Cerporaztea. County of ) Pa rtasr-M. oz ledi.W..I) The persea(s) .1561.4 •bore far Coatracter, know to me la individual ad beat.... "Pacl[y .. stated, petaea.'IF appeared Leto,- a coda aad ..km—ledgrd that be/ch., executed It aad that the corpo,.tioa or partnership named above executed it. D.t.d- I (SEAL) .•cavy Pu►:lc - ----------------------•_••---•--•-----_--•---•---_--------------------------------- FOIM APPROVED[ 7. S. CLACSEW. wcety C.....1, rr __D-put? (Pare 2 of 4) Rev- 12172 -14- 00089 7. YO{I COSTIAC% CRAS.:IS. (a) IF their sl{..tura 1. Section Z. etlect:ve as the above date, times. Parise. promise sad ag vee a sec to rib is tbl♦ cant,.ct. lecsrpoutLg by Chase references the aa[er1a2 i'r.cishles') !e Sec. 1. (b) Contractor mall, at his out eost .ad ..Pease, aad la a wark...liie e:nner, lolly aad faltbf.11y Perfoc■ and .—Plot. s cork; 406 will furalab all sacxn xis, labor, ,.,rices sad eraasporeatloa •.teen.r7, CanreaI. I aad proper 1n order fairly to rector. Che req vl reuats oL this coat vac[, all a[r1ct77 So accordance wl to cbe rutllc Agency's PI a.)t, dra�l.ga aad .....i tcat to as. (e) This cork Co. be ebaateG o:Iy WStb-lob lit Apmcy • prior wrlttra orQer spell lyt+{ such eb—ge aad its ..at al reed Co by cbe parties; aad the Pub21C Agency shall never bar. co pal tare than specified in Sec. 7 without such as ardor. 4. 7iMC: NOTICt TO PP-0CIEE Coatracter .ball at.tt this work as directed 10 [b. aper!- ficatlon. or for goitre [a !exceed; Amit bell complex• it as .pgcliled to Sec. 1. 5. LSOCIDATED DAMAGES. If the Contractor falls to templet. chi. contract aad tbls vert rl[bla the time fixed tb.refor, .Ilnvaace being sale for couttmgencles .a prevlQsd berela, be bete... liable to tie Rb11. Agency to z all ice lou sed dasa{e [ber.Ltos; tray the at... of the Co.-. it 1s ad v113 ►e lapractl ubI& and extremely difficult [e ascetlala mad f1a cbe PWItc Agency's actu.l damage [von say dela in part*"Sec& hereof, It is agreed . . contractor will ya •. iia l dated domyes [o cbe Public Agency tAs Leaaomab le .— nye,!lied !o Sec. 2, the zesrli o[ Ch• 5.,x3.6 re ueu►Se endure, to est,-at- fair ...rage coa►sa..tics !be nt•,, for sack ,.leader day's dela in finishing uid Werk; and it the sue be mot pa N, public Ag.Ky uy, is addition to its .,h 11 reudlea, deduct the .nae iron any roeey duo or to ►,come due Contract.. ander [b1. cow- CC.et._ If the Public Agency for any cause ..tberises er coatrUu,.s to a dela. s.apem- aloe of wens► or ..,.Auto. of tine, Its drratl.a skull be added to the Lias allowed Le, eomple[1oa, ►et it .ball sec b. daen.l •mal res mar he used to delent •ny rig bt of cAe A,gemy to daugaa ter nom-comple tie. oz delay ►e nrmN r. Fore ung Ca Goveroaeoc Coda Sec. 4215, the Contractor .ball met ►e auenaed 2lgeidaced lomaprs for de Ly !s comp Lt2os o[ Ch*red, ebem such dela rax on--' y Che [allure of Ce public Agency e[ tb. erwrr o[ • at111t7 to provide for removal ec celec.ttaa of existing utility facilities. h. INTECI&TED DOCDSEtTS. The Plans, drartage aad specification., of any Public AS* cy'a �. call far bid., and Contractor'■ aceeste! b1! for this wok •re ►e r.by loco rear+c.d tato [hU contract; and tMy are Sateaded [e ea-.peva[., so tka[ aaytbias blted la eke plans er dzw Ings mad moi seatleaed In the spec211catleas, or vlot veru, !a to be egacnted as it exblblted, mentlaaed and meg !etch !a hotb, to t►. [one tatenc aad ■elatng ' [\e roof ,hen cake. all together; *ad dltfe.eacrs of op3.3on concerning Chau sh.il b. finally d<teeniud ►y Public Ag..c7'. Agent p:clfL.4 la Sec. 1. 7. PAYMENT. (a) far his strict omd 3l,.enl [r1f111seac e! Cb.se , rom.... and condltlow, - and as full coryensatloa (er .S1 ibis re[h, the pr►llc A{envy shall pal tee CenL,accer the sus speclfled Sa Sec. 1, except tbae to wait prier contracts the pays.:[ . I. b. for flelahed quantities at —it bid Pot.... (►) On or &beat the first 447 of each calendar south the Contractor shall submit to the Public Agomc7 a werltlN .ypliutioa ter pmyua[. agperted by • s,.[omn.t shoving all .at rlsla actoml ly Saaia2led dor 1.{ Cke pteeedlag month, the label 14p.rded tbr[sea, and Cbe coat t►ereef; rberewPo., alts, drrck L{, cbe public Agency •hall ls.m. co Contractor a Co. ifi,.t♦ for t►e omsaa Ge[s enS d to bs doe, .taus l0T [hereof pntsn.ot to Co—C.xa:[ Code Sec. 57067, but no[ —til lefrctle. roCh cad aa.rlals b.re beea roved, replaced and made toed. A. PAYMENTS Y2TNNELD. (a) The public Agency or fL• .{est may rltbbold any payment, at ►:cause e! later Q1sc*re red .., . a mwllll7 all or .my ter[,fl !te for pa.asa[, to such extent mad p-Clod of time only as any be secesury to protect t►e public Agency tram lass b.cause of: (1) Defective Work am, team died. or —completed cork, , (2) C1.1— flied o. ,..soma►le evidence fadicatlwi ,,.b.bl. fillag, (7) Failure to proyetly pa sW.entractors or for uter,.l er labor. (4) geuoma►le doubt chat the nark can be completed for the L.I omce Chea map aid, or (5) Damage to another contractor. (b) The Public Agency aaa12 use reuaulle e111Nace to discover aad report to cbe f CeaCactor, a [he work pcogre.sea, c\e sace.lals aad labor Wbicb ue net ut2s[ac[o[y ce SC, so a to avoid —necessary 11-11. me cosi to the Coatractor to making good any detective Work or parts. (e) 75 calendar days after the P1b31c Agency files its notice of coopletien of the entire (page 2 of 4) -14a- 3. WORK CONTRACT. CRANLES. (a) Ar tbely signatures to Section 2. *((*4tive ea the above date; these parif:a promise and amen as set forth 1a this csarACC. Incorporating by Ch.* rage re acts the aattrl11 levaciab2ei) In Sec. 1. (bl Centra ger shall, at bis ova .at sad enpease, sad 1. a worksaaitke ra ". fail, sad faftbtully perform sad .—Plate this rock; sad rill fern!:h all ma[erUL. later, services sad transporcatloa ....aamr,, ceavemient *:cc apro par 1a order Islrly to geIf— ter rap wl reasa[s of this coat tact, sIl strictly 1n accordA— vita the hb21c Agency's yt silt. drrrtags sad speclrt utioss. (e) This work Co. be cbaaged o:I,' with!d lac Apac, a prior vrlttra order spec!ly/nL such [huge sad Sts cost agreed to by Che ,stiles; and the Pubilc Agracy shall ¢cur brava to pay"to t►aa specified 1n So.. 7 wltb..t sic► am order. A. TIME: NOTICE TO PROCEED. Contractor shall start this work as directed 1. the •pact- . ficatlons or the Notice to proceed; and shall complete it as spSclfled In Sec. I. 5. LSQCIDATFD DA_MA:ES. 1f tee C¢acrattar falls to ceapl.tt this contract sad this vert wlthla tee rine 11se4 therefor, al2ovance being wade for comtisge.cles as provided berela, be beteaea 2lable co tGe tab itc Agency for all 1[s lona sed da*ag. the relrea; and bec.0 e, Irom the aatrte wt tae case, is 1s +ad rill ►+ fnPracticaDl• sad •atrenal, difticalc co ascettala sad lla the 1Wllc A..,.,, ; actual damage froa as y de1a7 In Perin[a ancr hereof, St 1a agreed thaz contractor vitt pay as ll[ri dated dun... to the Public Agency the teaw pa6le sera sPeciii.d !a Sec. ), tat result o! Lae parties' r.+•ons►2e cadaver to estlsate fair asermte co. ...art.. tbetefer, for :sea cal..dsr day's drain, la lldlahiag old work; tad 1! tae nue ►e act pfd, tubilc Agency ay, to a661ttoa to its other readies, deduct the s e iron a.y a...v due ar to become due Comcrac rot ander chis Con- tract. If the Public Ag enc• for any [arse artborius or cont rlbutms co a delay, suapen- alon of wsk of eatcualom of tint. iia Quracles ,halt he added to the rise ailoved ter cmapletioa, but ft aba31 asI kr desatd a wsl ter nor ►e used to defeat say right of the Areacy to damages for non-comping.. or delay 6erens/e r. tureraaI to Goll.,. . t Cade Sec. 4215, the Coatractar shall set be as►esse♦ iftuldatrd dsagas for dela, to coapletl.. of the vert, rbsa soca de Ly vas cursed by the failure of the Pub11c Areacy er tba ovaar of a mtlllt7 to provide for remaval er nleCatf ora sf saimtlag rtlllq IACIIlila. A. INTEGRATED DOCL'SESTS. The plus, drawl.g1 sed 1 C!flcacloaa, et asy labii[ Ageeey's , call for bids, and Contractor's .—noted btA far cels werk are hers►, loco cps rated taco [his contract; and thq are laceadea to coroterate, w c►n anychldg uhlblted in the ?lana er dr ening. and not asatiaded in the sy ecilt:atloas, or ,1ce •era, U to be esacu[ed as if exhibited, aentla..d Sad •et lactk !n both, to the ttum latest sad nesalag thereof whoa taken a1I togethar; ..A differences of oplalow concerning these shall be finally detealasd by Public Agency'• Agent •?:.!tied Sd Sec. 1_ 7. PATMENT. (a) For his atttct nal literal ful[111se.c a! [hese promN e■ and coadltlow. and as full coepeaatioa tot x21 chis werk, ibe Public Agency shall pay tee Ce.tractor the sea *':"'I'd la Sec. 1, eacrpt ".at 1. colt price centra.[• the pay...I •ball be for finished ouutlties at unit ►1d prlcen. (►) Onor about the first day of each calendar aoatk the Contractor shall submit to Ch* Pub 1 1 C Areacy a vargtls4 appllu[1en [or ryTunt. arypor[ed by a staeeaedt showing all ■aterlals acenally Sna[alled 6rrldg t►e pferealat aast6, tae labor upen!:'.!h ed feet..., and t►e coat the reol; whersuyoo, +Icer caset leg, the Pabllc Agracy shall lasre eo Contractor a certificate for t►e +meant darn ral*ed to be due. alnea 10l [hereof puten-9 to Gevtrnaene [ode Sec. 53067, but no[ until defective work sad materials have bona ruo,ad. replaced sad ads good. A. PATMERTS vITRRELD. (s) The Public Agencyor fta agent m•y w":bou say pay...t, or ►stens. of lacer dl s<evermd .aide... nullify all or nay car'If lc+tfcr P+,nod[, co ..cb talent add period of t1.e oa17 as may be necessary to protect the Public Agascy fce■ lou because of: (3) Defective cork not remedied, or ucaapletrd cork, (2) Claims tiled or reasonable evlA ... fadicatiar yro►able filing. (5) Failure to properly pay a Wcon t1:ctets or for material or labor. (A) Reasoaab3. doubt that the work can be completed for the balance tae. nap al d, or (5) Dansa. to anucher coat tactor. (►) the Public Aaeacy aaa12 ase reasaulle /lilienee to 6t+cover mad rtpor[ to tae Csattactor, a the vork prorrea ens, tae sacerlala sad labor which ere net ucfafactory to it, mo as to avoid uaaecesaery tro¢ble er cast to tea Contractor fn ..king good any defective vark or parts. (e) 75 calesdar da,s after the Public Agency files its notice of CDOPietfos of the :*Cllr (tags 2 of A) -14a- REV. X2172 00090 -14a- REV. 12172 00090 work, It .ball issue a ce rtiflcar. to the contractor and pay the b•Iaace oI the coact... ►rice atter dedactiog all amounts withheld mdrt [hi• <Ontrart, provided tb. Cencraeter ahovs tbat all claim. for labor rials have berm paid, ao clatma have bee. presented to the Public ♦paq based oa acts or asf.nano. of the Coat ractoc. and ao It.. - or withhold aoticas have bees !lied •tolnK the ..ck or .1[s, mad provided tber• at. not re.eeaablc Ssdicalia— of defaccive or ■last*& vork of of lac.-cecorded notice. of It... or claims against Contractor. ` 9. INSURANCE. (Leber Code 5/3t60-61) On slgnlal this contra[[, [o.traccor mus[ Ltrs Public Ateaq (1) • ee TtIf ICAt* of coaun[ to a•1!-lona[. fsarsd by the Director of r Sada.tri al gelatIoas, or (2) a ce"I ficacs of Uorkaen'. ConpeasatIOU 1naaT•ade Issued by - an admitted !.surer, or (3) an [matt copy et dnp2lca[e tbercef c•Ttliled by cAa Dttertot , or the Insurer. Contractor t■ aw re of mad compiles tib L+Dnr Cods Ssc. 3700 mad rho . ttorkmea'a Cespeasatlo. Law. 10. {ONDS. On st plat c►1a cane tact Conc cactoT ■hall deliver to Public Agency for approval good and sufficleat.bonds with anret2es, !o .....CW spotlited to RAs ap•cl[1= -- [.Hens, guaranteeing his faithful performance of tbla contract mad his pays.nc.tor all _ i lahot Red n.terials h•reaoder. 11. rAILCRE TO PERF013%. If the Cos[racter at say time trfuse. or argleccs, without fault of ibe Publlt Agency or it. stent(.), to sapplT snlficient ..feel a3s or vorY.ee to couple ce Chis at tome.[ mad vork as prov2ded herein, tar a D<rlad of 10 days or more otter .Title. notice tberrof by the Pabllc Atracy, [be Publ/c Agency nal faralab same and deduct the reasonable expenses [hereof from the contract price. 12. LADS APPLT. General. tach parties recognize the appllcablllcF of various federal,. at ate mad local lana and erg a3sclou, esp•rl.I17 Chapt.r 1 of Part 7 of the Callfocata _ Leber Cede (betlaaiag nigh Sec. 2T20, mad Sacl odl,{ Secs. 1735 t 1777.6 forbtddtn{ dls- crlsdaatlo.) mad !.read chat [Ata at casafat ramplles checrvtth. TAe guar[las sp•citically .!pular[ that t►e relevaai p<naltto. mad forfeitures provided In the Labor Code, e.pet1a31T la Sacs. 37)5 6 IU J, coacera3a{ pre va lila& .ago. a.d hour., shall apply to - - i►1s .g a•eaeat m. though !ally silpalaud herein. 13. SZ2 XTRACTORS. gave resent Code !16100-4113 are lncarparatcd becalm. 14. DACE RATES. (a) Pursuant to Labor Code Sec. 1773, the goverml.g body of the Public Agency has ascertained the general preya111eg rates of .alts per diem, mad tot holiday and one rtiae vork, to the locality !a.n1cA this vark !. to b< Perla ned, for each craft, i elusSfacatlas, er type of vGtka:o •ceded to eaacuu this [:.tract, mad said rates •re as apecifled In the call for bid. for tbls rock mad are as tl le with c6• Publto A{sncy, sad ate ►creD) Soca rporaied keret.. (b) This schedule of wages is based an s working day of { hours unless otherwise specified; and the daily rate is the hontly race multiplied bf the suaber of hours coa- altutlat the working day. Theo leas char that •usher of ho acs are rocked, the dally wag. rate !. propor[l...rely reduced, ba[ the hourly race r...Lee as stared. (c) The Co.[rattor, +.d all b2. smDcoec vac tor., must pay at least these rates to all person• o■ tbia vork, 1mc2udiat all tray<1, :uQ els tent:, and !rials bene!![ Payseats provided for by applicable collective bartalsimg a{reeaen[s. All skilled labor mot llatad a►owe mast be pard ai least the wage .tale eatabll abed b7 collectiva bargaining &Srccrosot for snch labor !o the local![" .her• eucA wort fs being perfocaed. If 11 became for the CO.tr.ctOr or any sw6coettacto. to replay any persom 1. a eta![, clasalf!- c•tloa or type of work at executive, supe cvtsoc7. •dnlatatcat Lve, clerical or otber .on-maa.al workers as such) for welch ■e nlata.. wage rats is sprclfi<d, [1, Contractor .ball 1.m•diately notify chr public agency which shall proaPtly donees!.. the pr.vafllng wage [ate t6e[eformad furai.h the [oa[tacco[ with ch. niat.u. rate based [bets•., which .hall app!. from toe time of for f_1timI emp1 7 .or e! [be P...a. affected and during the ceatlauaace of such employment. 1S. HOURS OF LABOR. Eight hours of labor to one calradar day constitutes'. legal day's wort, and ao varieao employed a[ any time ea tbfa vork by the Contactor er b7 any •uD- tomicac[ot .hall be repaired or pecat ited [o wort longer chr ream r►cept as pr ovldrd in Labor Code Sec.. 1{10-1615. 16. APP[LN710E 5. Properly fad<atured arDreatice. nay be <eplored an this work !n accordance wlta Labor Cole Secs. l:77.5, oad 177J.b an awn-dlac[ial.attOn. (rose 1 at 4) A Rev. 12;7? -14b- 00092 I _ 'r r_ 17. P[EiE[EXa, AJR tlAIESIALS. The Public Agency desires is prove rbr lndusiriss avQ ecsaony of Cogria Cesta 4euair, asd a\e Cao[Y+ct*r therein rs p[om L re to u*r ter p[oQucts, woikvea, lab*refs and aechaalcs of [bis Cnunty !n ere r7 case where the price, ftiness and quality are equal. It. ASSICX8INT. This agreement blvd* the bei rs, success.C.. &+slags, and representatives 01 the Contractor: Lui !f CiaPOi a&aljN !t fa Yhole Or SO part, nor any a¢a!f/ due or 10 heco.r due ender it. vltho*t the prier wtltc.. C*Patnt o[ [ht Public Agency sad the Contractor's surety or sureties, unless they bare 31.ed Notice of assigaaen[. 19. NO UIYE[ DY PI'g Ci:aCTXCT, laspectlae at the work asd/or materia L, os apprevaI of week anQ/or mater "Is Its or autrment br amy officer, a{eat er employer of the Public Aaeacy lad" It thf wort or any pare thereof complies vtth the n quirentnts oL this contract, of aecrptame of the vbol. at say part of said mark gad/or &ate rlaIN, or payments iherefoi, er any co.binaI'm s of The st acts, saa11 eat rellerr tae Coo:.'are, of his obiltatlaa to fm2fl12 thio cnntr&cz as pzescrtbed: sor shall the %bile Agree. be LhereDr estopped troy brivgtag any action for demageo or enforcement arising from the failure to comply with gay of the rola* and Condition. hereof. 20. [ILD HAMESS A INDEMNITY. (a) Contractor prom Les to gad .ball held Aaratrss +ad imdesg•ify from the 11abillts— As de used is this ssce3oe. (b) Tae indemnitees beaefitrd and proteccrd by thio Pro slse ase chi Pubitt Agent• and It. elect!.. gad appoiatt.t boards, count a. effics rs, a{rets and Tapley rf s. (c) The ItAblllties preLecud a{a3v*t are avy !!ablllty or clala 1:1,d.a.ge *f war blvd alleaetly sulfe rad fmccread or cD reaLeoeQ beuuu e( &tile&• deElebelow, faClndin; pens oaai !e]nry, death, properly !mage, isrrrse csndesas[lon, er •ar conbina[!on of [nese, ret+rdlefs of ehetber er arc such 1l ability, claim or daaate uas nateres<u.It at gay t!a* before the Cc maty ap►iored eD• lNpr¢.tunt plea er accepted for laproreaeats +s cofplttod. .ad Including the defense of any cult(:) or actlrm(s) ac lav er rqulty Caocrinln{ three. (d) The actions causing Liability are avy act os omissf ea (n♦;1!{egg e[ oov megliarat) !a csnaectiea vita the utter• cevrred by tbi. ceatrstt and sttrib ucabts to the contractor, smbcoat ractor(s), *r gay a Sear(.). *gent(*) or employea(s) e! on* or mora of �. [Dew. (a) Nnv-Csediti¢a*: The promise *ad *{leearoc !a [his see[tem is tlot conQ![lened of depeadfat as vbetber or Pot any ladeaalter Das preparN, avpplled, or +ppreved Jas p Ln(s) er apec".c.". (a) 1■ ceasec[3oa veli► this vark. Das tasoraac. er ether lvd—ONACaci.. co.erlvj uy Of ibe:e vette rs. Or that the alleged damage resulted !rely from gay Ttli- coni or Willful miscoaduct of say lademeftee. (►ace A of L) -14c- Rev. 12/72 00092 i SEMI ON E - ED iC. W .urs EhTW eXr C.9PCaml i f Part Ir The previsions of this Part I apply to bidders, contractors and subcontractors with respect to those ccnstr=ticn trades for which they are parties to collective bargaining agreements with a labor organisation or organizations and who together with such labor organizations have agreed to the Tripartite agreement for Contra Costa Cccaty, California (tut only as to those trades as to which there are caadtvmnts by labor o ranizatious to specific goals of minority manpower utilization) together with all implementing agreements that have been and may hereafter be developed pursuant thereto, all of which documents are incorporated herein by referenze and are hereinafter cumulatively referred to as the Contra Costa Plan. Any bidder, contractor or subcontractor using one or more trades of construction employees most comply with either Part I or Part II of these Hid Conditions as to each such trade. Tbus, a bidder, ccatractor or subcontractor my be in compliance with these conditions by its inclusiou, with its union, in the Contra Costa Plan a specific commitment by that union to a goal of minority mampower utilization for such trade'i', thereby aeetinr, the provisions of this - Part I, and by its commitment to Part II in regard to trade•&, in the instance in which it is not included in the Contra Cosa Flan and, therefore, cannot meet the provisions of this Part I. To be eligible far award cr a contract under Part I of this Invitation for'.ids, a bidder or subcontractor must execute and submit as pert of its bid the certification required by Part III hereof. Part TI* A. Coveraze. The previsions of this Part II shall be applicable to those bidders, contractors and subcontractors, who, in regard to those constrcction trades to be employed by than on the project to which these bid conditions pertain. 1. ire not or hereafter cease to be signatories to the Contra Costa Plan refereed to in Par I bereof; 2. Are signatories to the ContzaCesta Plan but are not parties to collective bargaimn agreements; ?. Are signatories to the Contra Costa Plan but are parties to collective bargaining agreements with labor organizations who are not or here- after cease to be signato:ss to the Contra Costa Plan. L. are sirratories to the Contra Costa Plan but as to which not specific named tment to goals or minority manpower utilization by labor organi- zation have been executed pursuant to the Contra Costa Plan; or Rev. 5/76 _15_ OOC93 VP 5. Are no longer participating in an affir^--ative action plan accep- table to the Director.DPCC, including the Contra Costa Plan. D, Heauirement --Am Affirmative Action Plan. The bidders, contractors ' and subcontractors described in paragraphs 1 through 5 above will not eligible far award of a contract coder this Invitation for Bids, unless it certifies as prescribed in paragraph 2b of the certification specified in Part III hereof that it adopil the minimum goals and timetables of minority manpower utilization,_ and specific affirmative action steps set fourth in Section 5.1 and 2 of this Part It directed at increasing minority manpower utilization by=cans of applying good faith efforts to carrying our such steps or is deemed to have adopted such a program put- suant to Section 3.3 of this Part I1. Both the goals and timetables, and the affirmative action steps nut meet the requirements of this Part 11 as set forth below for all trades which are to be utilized on the project, whether subcontracted or not. 1. Coals and Timetables. The goals of minority manpower utilization for the bidder and subcontractors are applicable to each trade not other- wise Lound by the provisions of Part I hereof for the following time periods. for each trade which will be used on the project within Contra Costa County. California. ' The ranges for all trades to be utilized an the project shall be as follows: From 1C11/7k 17.E- 14.51 in the event that under a coat act which is subject to these Sid Con- ditions any vark is performed in a year later than the latest year for which acceptable rang-es of nfmrity manpower utilization have been determined herein, the ranfes fcr the period 1WI17L through 9130175 shall be applicable to such work. The perceSU-,es of nincrity manpower utilization above are expressed in terms of marhours of t.-airing-and esvlcyaent as a proportion of the total manhoars to be worked by the bidder's, ccu•.ractor's and subcontractor's entire work force in that trade on all projects in Contra Costa County, California during the performance cr its contract or subcontract. The nanhours for minority work and training must be substantially uniform throne m t,the length of the contract, on all pro,iects and for each of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority employees or trainoes from employer-ta-eroloyer or frcr,prosect-to-project for the sale purpose of.retie;the ccatra_.or's or subcontractor's goals aha12 be a violaticn Cr the--c cooditions. liiaont; s e-aned as:acludinz.Neerces,Spaniah Surnar►ri American.^, . Orientals and Szerican loiians. Rev. 5176 00091 1 NORM 6 , i 2. Specific Affirmative Acrion Steers. Bidders, contractors and subcontractors subject to this Part I1. must engage in affirmative ac- tion directed at increasing minority manpower utilization, which is at least as extensive and as specific as the following steps: } a. The contractor shall notify com ity organizations that the contractor has employment opportunities available and shall maintain records of the organizations' response. b. The contractor shall maintain a file of the aces and ad- dresses of each minority.worker refferred to him and what action was taken with respect to each such referred worker, and if the worker was not employed, the reasons therefor. If such worker was not sent to the union hiring hall for referral or if such worker was not employed by the contractor, the contractor's file sball document this and the reasons therefor. c. The contractor shall promptly notify the CONMA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC UMn MWa-.-uW when the union or unions with whoa the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement has not referred to the contractor a mina.-ity worker sent by the contractor or the contractor has other information that the union referral process bas impeded him in his efforts to meet his goal. d. The contractor shall participate in-training programs in the area, especially those funded by the Depar=—t of Labor. e. The contractor shall disseminate his EEO policy within his own organization by including it in any policy manual; by publicizing it in company newspapers, aemmal reports. etc.; by conducting staff, employee and mina representatives' meetings to explain and discuss the policy; by posting of the policy; and-by specific review of the policy with minority emmmployees. - f. The contractor sball disseminate his EEO policy externally by informing and discussing it with all recruitment sources; by advertis- ing in news media, specifically including minority news media; and by notifying and discussing it with all subcontractors and suppliers. g. The contractor shall make specific-and constant personal (both written and oral) recruitment efforts directed at all minority organizations. schools with minority students, miacriry recrvimeat organisations and minority training organizations within the can, tar's recruibeent area. - h. The contractor shall cake specific efforts to encourage present minority employees to recruit their friends and relatives. i. The contractor shall validate all man specifications, selec- tion requirements, tests. etc. Bev. 5/76 -18- 0009' 1 I Pro P/ r,. present ainority employees to recruit their friends and relatives. i. She contractor shall validate all ala specifications. selec- tion requirements. tests. ate. Bev. 5/76 -18- 0009' U :A 14 Ew Aft LL t .:y and for each of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority employees - or trainees from e=ployer-to-cmployer or from project-to-project for the • sole purpose of meeting the contractor's or subcontractor's goals shall. be a violation of these conditions. _ In reaching the goals of minority manpower utilization required of bidders, cant-actors and subcontractors pursuant to this Part 11, every effort shall be made to find and employ qualified journeymen. However, . where ninartry journeymen are not available, ninorit7 trainees in pre- apprenticeship, apprenticeship, journeyman training or other training programs r-sy be used. In order that the nonworking training .boars of trainees may be counted in meeting the goal..such trainees must be eaployeed by the con- tractor during the training period, the contractor nusc have made a can- micment to employ the trainees at the taepletion of their training and the trainees must be trained pursuant to established training programs which mast be the equivalent of the training programs now or bereinafcer provided for in the Contra Costa?lam with respect to the nature, extent and duration of training offered. A contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be in compliance with the terms and requirements of this Part II by the employment and training of minorities in the appropriate percentage of his aggregate wort:force in Contra Costa Canty, Califoaia for each trade for which it is carm:itted to a goal under this Part II. However, no eonz-actor or subcontractor shall be found to be in noncompliance solely on account of its failure to meet its goals within Its timetables, but such contractor shall he given the opportunity to demonstrate that it has instituted all of the specific affiemative action steps specified in this Parr II and has evade every good faith effort to make these steps work toward the attainment of its goals within its time- tables, all to the purpose of expanding minority manpower utilization on all of its projects 3a Contra Costa County. California. In all cases, the compliance of a bidder, contractor or subcontractor will be determined in accordance with its respective obligations under the terms of these Bid Conditions. Therefore, contractors or subcontractors uiuo are governed by the provisions of this Part II shall be subject to the requirements of that Part regardless of the obligations of its prime con- tractor or lower tier subcontractors. All bidders and all contractors and subcontractors performing or to perform work on projects subject to these Bid Conditions hereby agree to inform their subcontractors of their respective obligations under the ----and requirements of these Bid Conditions. including the provisions ,.. -:ng to goals of minority employment and training. Rev. 5/76 Of � 5. Are no longer participating in an affirmative accion plan accep- table to the Director. OFCC, including the Contra Costa Plan. B. Reeuirement —An Affirmative Action Plan, The bidders, contractors ' and subcontractors described in paragraphs 1 through 5 above will not eligible for award of a contract ceder this Invitation for Bids, unless it certifies as prescribed in paragraph 2b of the certification specified in Part III hereof that it adopts the minimum goals and timetables of minority manpower utilization,_ and specific affirmative action steps set fourth in Section 3.1 and 2 of this Part 1I directed at increasing minority uapwer utilization by weans of applying good faith efforts to carrying out such steps or is deemed to have adopted such a program put- scant to Section 3.3 of this Part 11. Both the goals and timetables, and the affirmative action steps must meet the requirements of this Part Ir as set forth below for all trades which are to be utilized on the project, whether subcontracted or not. 1. Goals and Timetables. The goals of minority manpower utilization for the bidder and subcontractors are applicable to each trade not other- visa bound by the provisions of Part I hereof for the following time periods, for each trade which will be used on the project within Contra Costs County, California. The ranges for all trades ro be utilized ou the project sball be as follows! From tCAM t7-M- 19.5% In the event that under a contract which is subject to these Bid Con- ditiors any uorc is performed in a year later than the latest year for which acceptable ranges of minority canpwer utilization have been determined herein, the ranges for the period 10M through 9130/75 shall be applicable to such wort. The percenta;es of mincrity manpower utilization above are expressed in teras of imsahours of traicing and ecvloyment as a proportion of the total nanhours to be wormed by the bidder's, cue-ractor's and subcontractor's entire work force in that trade on all prefects to Contra Costa County, California during the performance of its coccract or subcontract. The manhours for minority work and traduinq rust be subatantiaily uniform throughout,the length of the contract, on all proiects and for each of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority enp1eyee3 or trainces free employer-to-employer or free project-to-protect for the sole perpose cif-eeting the centra=xr's or subcontractor's goals shall be a rolaticm cf these conditions. hinori-,is defined as IngcldinZ Ntgroa3, Spanish Surnamcl Americans, Orientals a-d Iverican Iwdiants. Rev. 5/76 -16- }' 00091 and for eacb of the trades. Further, the transfer of minority employees or trainees from employer-to-cmployer or from project-to-project for the - sole purpose of meeting the contractor's or subcontractor's goals shall be a violation of these conditions. In reaching the goals of minority manpower utilization requiredof bidders, contractors and subcontractors pursuant to this Part II, every _ effort shall be rade to find and employ qualified journeymen. However, - where minority journeymen are not available, minority trainees in,pre- apprenticeship. apprenriceship, journey-an training or other training programs maybe used. - In order that the nonworking training .boors of trainees may be counted in meeting the goal..sucb trainees most be employeed by the con- tractor during the training period, the contractor most have made a con- mirmeot to employ the trainees at the ccgletion of their training aod, the trainees most be trained pursuant to established training programs - which must be the equivalent of the training programs now or hereinafter provided for in the Contra Costa Plan with respect to the nature, extent and duration of training offered - A contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be in compliance with the ter_s and requirements of this Part II by the employment and training of minorities in the appropriate percentage of his aggregate - work force in Contra Pasta County. California for each trade for which it is committed to a pal Lader this Part II. However, no cant.-acror or subcontractor shall be found to be in noncagliance solely on account of its failure to meet its goals within Its timetables, but such contractor shall be given the opportunity to demstrate that it has instituted all of the specific affirmative action steps specified in this Part II and has made every good faith effort to make these steps work toward the a:---airaent of its goals within its time- tables. all to the purpose of expanding minority manpower utilization on _ all of its projects in Centra Costa County. California. In all cases. the compliance of a bidder, contractor or subcontractor will be determined in accordance with its respective obligations under the tops of these Bid Conditions. Therefore, contractors or subcontractors who are governed by the provisions of this Part II shall be subject to the requirements of that Part regardless of the obligations of its prime con- tractor or lower tier subcontractors. All bidders and all contractors and subcontractors performing or to perform work on projects subject to these Bid Conditions hereby agree to inform their subcontractors of their respective obligations under the •-^- and requirements of these hid Conditions, including the provisions ,._ •:ag to goals of m:sority employs eat and training. Rev. 5/76 -1T- e; f 0009- 2. Specific Affirmative Action Stews. Bidders, contractors and subcontractors subject to this Part I1, must eaLage in affirmative ac- tion directed at increasing minority==power utilization, which is at least as eztmsive and as specific.as the following steps: a. The contractor shall notify coomunity organizations chat the contractor has employment opportunities available and shall maintain records of the organizations' response. b. The contractor shall maintain a file of the names and ad- dresses of eaeb miaority.worker refferred to him and what action was taken with respect to each such referred worker. and if the worker was not employed, the reasons therefor. If such worker was not sent to the union biring ball for referral or if such worker was not employed by the contractor. the contractor's file shall document this and the reasons therefor. e. The contractcr shall presptl7 notify the COMA COSTA COMTr pUB=Mm L aP—mr vheo the onion or unions with when the ccntractor has a collective bargaining acreement has not referred to the contractor a nun.-ity worker sent by the contractor or the contractor has other information that the union referral process has iVeded him in his efforts to met his goal. d. The contractor shall participate in.traiaing programs in the area, especially those funded by the Department of Labor. e. The contractor sball disseminate his EEO policy within his own organisation by including is in any policy■ 1; by publicizing it in company nev"pers, annual reports. etc.; by condo zing staff, employee and union representatives' meetiags,to explain and discuss the policy; by posting of the policy; and-by specific review of the policy with minority employees. f. The contractor shall disseminate his EDD policy externally by informing and discussing it with all recruitment soured; by advertis- ing in news media, specifically including minority news media; and by notifying and discussing it with all subcontractors and suppliers. X. The contractor shall sake specific'aad constant personal (both written and oral) recruitment efforts directed at all minority organizations, schools with minority students, minority recruitment organizations and minority training organizations within the contractor's l recruitact area. b. Toe contractor shall make specific efforts to encourage present minority employees to recruit their friends and relatives. i. The contractor shall validate all mom specifications, selec- tion requirements, tests, etc. Rev. 5/)b 00091 I k d J. the contractor shall sake every effort to promote after- school, stirrer and vacation empIo}veot to minority youth. k. The contractor shall develop on-the-job training opportun- ities and participate and assist in any association or employer-group training programs relevant to the contractor's employee needs consistent with its obligations under this Part I1. L The contractor shall continually inventory and evaluate all minority personnel for promotion opportunities and encourage minority em- ployees to seek such opportunities. m. The contractor shall make sure that seniority practices job classifications, etc., do not have a discriminatory effect.. n. The contractor shall cake cereal- that all facilities and company activities are non-segregated. o. The contractor shall continually monitor all personnel ac- vities to ensure that his EM polity is being carried out. p. 'Me contractor shall solicit bids for subcontracts frgm available minority subcontractors engaged in the trades covered by these Did Conditions, including circulation of minority contractor association. 3. Contractors and Subcontractors Deemed to be Bound by Part II. In the event a contractor or subcontractor, who is at the time of bidding eligible under Part I of these Did Conditions, is no longer participating in an affirmative actio-plan acceptable to the Director of the Office of Federal Contract Compliance. including the Contra Costs Plan, he shall be deemed to be—fitted to Part II of these Did Conditions. Further, when- ever a contractor or subcontractor, who at the time of bidding is eligible ander Part II of these Did Conditions, uses trades not enotemplisted at ' the time be submits his bid,be shall be committed to Part II for those trades. Ubenever a can tar at subcontractor is deemed to be committed to Part II of those Did Conditions.he shall be considered to be comsitsed to a manpower utilization goal of the mint—percentage range for chat trade for the appropriate year. i 4. Subsequent Sienatory to the Contra Costa Plan. Any contractor . or subcontractor subject to the requirements of this Parc II for any made ` at the rise of the submission of his bid who together with the labor or- ganization vith whom It has a collective bargaining agreement subsequently becomes a signatory to the Contra Costa Plan, either individually or through. an assoeitation, may meet its requirements under these Did Conditions for such trade, if such contractor or subcontractor executes and submits a new certification comitting himself to Part I of these Bid Conditions. No contractor or subcontractor shall be deemed to be subject to the require- ments of Part I until such certification is executed and submitted. Rev. 5/76 —19— {; s 000TI such trade. if such`cum_cxtorfor sac .�- sse Bid touditions for certification comitting himselfand submits a III or to Pais t arches:BldeConditfons. to new subcontractor shall be deemed to be subject to the regnire- meats of Part I until such certification is executed and subm£tred. ��. 5/76 -19- 00097 i 5. Xm-d£scr£r_instion. In no event u7 a contractor or subcontractor utilize the goals. timetables or affinoat£ve action steps required by this Part 11 in such a manner as to cause or result in discrimination against any person on account of race. color. religion, sex or national origin. Part III: Certifications. A. Bidders' Certification. A bidder will not be eligible for award of a contract under this Invitation for Bids un- less such bidder has submitted as a part of its bid the following certifi- cation. which will be deemed a part of the resulting contract: BIDMSI c1 amcarm certifies that: (Bidder) 1. it intends to employ the following listed construction trades in its work under the contract and 2. (a) as to those trades set forth in the.preceding paragraph one hereof for which it is eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions for Participation in the Contra Costa Plan. it will comply with the Contra Costa Plan on this and all future cam ttuction work id Contra Costa County within the scope of cawsrage of that Plan, those trades beliV and/or - (b) as to those trades for which it is required by these Bid Conditions to comply with Part 11 of these Bid Conditions. it adopts the=Wminority manpower utilization goals and the specific affir- mative action steps contained in said Part 11. an this and all future construction work in Contra Costa County subject to these Bid Conditionv those trod"beings . and 3. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors and submit to the contracting or administering agency prior to the card of any subcontract under this contract the subcontractor certification required by these Bid Conditions. (Signature of authorized representative of bidder) _. r-1-contractors' Certifications. Pzior to the award of any subcontract under this Invitation for Bids. regardless of tier, the prospective sub- contractor most execute and submit to the Prime Contractor the following certification. which will be deemed a part of the resulting subcontract: Rev. 5/75 -20- 0009S SU3C -rRA=RS' CERTIFICAnos certifies that: (Sabeon:ractat) 1. it intends to employ the following listed construction trades in its work ander the subcontract 2 (a) as to those trades set forth in the preceding paragraph one hereof for which it is eligible under Part I of these Bid Conditions for participation in the Contra Costa Plan, it will comply vitt the Contra Costa Plan on this and all future crostm crion work in Contra Creta County subject to these Bid Conditions, those trades being: and/or (b) as to those trades for which it is required byrhese Bid Conditions to comply with Part 11 of Chex Bid Conditions,it adopts:the aini—aimrity manpower utilization goals and the specific affirmative .. action steps contained in said Part H on this and all future mnstrtictioa work in Contra Cosa County subject to than Did Caaditima,thaae trades being: and _ 3. it will obtain from each of its subcontractors prior to-the award- of any subcontract under this subcontract the subcontractor certification required by these Bid Conditions. (Signature of authorized representative of bidder) - In order to ensure that the said subcontractors' certification be comes a part of all subcontracts under the prism contract, no subcontract shall be executed until an authorized representative of the Contra Costa County' Public Works Department has deterninmi, in writing, that the said certification has been incorporated in such subcontract, regardless. of tier. Acy subcontract executed without such written approval sha11, be voided. C. Materialiry&:d Resoonsiveoess. The certifications required to be _ :rade by the bidder pursuant to these Bid Conditions is material and will - - vvern , bidder's performance on the project and will be rude a part ,f his 14a. Failure to submit the certification will render the bid nonresponsive. Rev. 5/76 _21_ �.N 00000 Part IV: Compliance and Enforcement. Contractors are responsible for informing their subcontractors regard esr of tier) as to their respective, obligations under Parts 1 and 11 hereof (.•: applicable). The bidder, contractor or subcontractor shall carry out such sar�zlons and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause including suspension, termination and cancellation of existing subcontracts as may be imposed or ordered by the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. Any bidder, or contractor or subcontractor who shall fail to carry out such sanctions and penalties shall be deemed to be in noncom- pliance with these Bid Conditions. Violation of any substantial requirement in the Contra Costa Plan by a contractor or subcontractor covered by Part 1 of these Bid Conditions including the failure of such contractor or subcontractor to make a good faith effort to meet its fair share of the trade's goals of minority manpower utilization, or of the requirements of Part It hereof try a contractor or subcontractor who is covered by Part It shall be deemed to be in noncompliance by such contractor or subcontractor with the Equal Opportunity Clause of the contract, and shall be grounds of Imposition of the sanctions and penalties provided herein. The Contra Costa County Public Yorks Department shall review its contractors' and subcontractors' employment practices during the performance of the contract. In regard to Part It of these conditions if the contractor or subcontractor meets Its goals or if the contractor or subcontractor can demonstrate that it has made every good faith effort to meet those goals, the contractor or subcontractor shall be presumed to be in compliance with these Bid Conditions and no formal sanctions or proceedings leading toward sanctions shall be instituted unless the agency otherwise determines that the contractor or subcontractor is not providing equal employment opportunities. to judging whether a contractor or subcontractor has met its goals, the agency will consider each contractor's or subcontractor's minority manpower utilization and rill not take into consideration the minority manpower utilization of its subcontractors. Yhere the agency finds that the contractor or subcontractor has failed to comply with the requirements of these Bid Conditions, the agency shall take such action and impose such sanctions as may be appropriate including, but not limited to: 1. Yithholding of paynents to the contractor under the contract until the • contractor complies, andfor 2. Cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part, and/or j. To the extent allowed by applicable State Statutes, the contractor may be declared ineligible for further County Public Yorks contracts until he satisfies the County that he has established and is implementing an Equal Employment Opportunity program which conforms to the provisions contained herein. When the agency proceeds with such formal action it has the burden of proving that the contractor has not met the requirements of these Bid Conditions, but the contractor's failure to meet his goals shall shift to him the requirement to come forward with evidence to show that he has met the "good faith"requirements of these Bid Conditions by instituting at least the Specific Affirmative Action steps listed above and by making every good faith effort to make those steps work toward the attainment of its !orals within its timetables. The pendency of such formal proceedings shall be taken into consideration by Contra Costa County Rev. 5/76 -72- 00100 in determining whether such contractor c: subcontractor can comply with the requirements contained therein and is therefore a "responsible prospective contractor." It shall be no excuse that the union with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement providing the exclusive referral failed to refer minority employees. The procedures set forth in these conditions shall not apply to any contract when the Contra Costa County Public Yorks Departm, t determines that such contract is essential to the national security sad that Its award without following such procedures is necessary to the national security. Contractors and subcontractors must keep such records and file such reports relating to the provisions of these Bid Conditions as shall be required by the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. Submittal of CALTRAKS form NC-7. FEDERAL-AID NIGMY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS EEO REPORT or optional form 66. MOMMY NANPOYER UTILIZATION REPORT will be required monthly. Additional forms or reports that may be required will be presented at a pre-construction conference to be held prior to the start of work. For the information of bidders. a copy of the Contra Costa Plan may be obtained from the Contra Costa County Public Yorks Department. Rev. 5/76 -23- DIVISION F. GEHERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1. Definitions: Whenever m the following ter , pronouns in place of them, or initials of organizations appear in the contract documents, they shall have the following meaning: Adden A document issued by the County during the bidding period which modifies, supersedes, or supplements the original contract documents. AfKfirmativUtilization t - en .tt '4aly, or monthly) prepared by the contractor for submission to the County which reports the total number of employees, the total number of min- ority employees. and the present minority manhours of total man- hours worked on the project. ASx9eaent - The Kitten document of agreement, exe- cuted by the County and the Contractor. rchitect o ea neer - Shall mum the architect, engineer. is v ua or eo-partnership. employed by the County of Contra Costa; as designated on the title sheet of these speci- fications. When Contra Costa County is designated as the EEnaggiinaeer. ' Engineer shall mean the Public Works Director, or his autharized representative. Bidder - Any individual, partnership. corporation, association. To-ME venture, or any combination thereof, submitting tproposal for the work. acting directly, or through a duly author- zed representative. Board of S r�visors - Shall mean the duly elected or appointed officials who coast cute such a Board, who will act for the County in all matters pertaining to the Contract. Chame Order - Is any change in contract time or price and any change coatract documents not covered by subcontractors Pro act Inspector. Construction S ery �. I ec ir. r Clerkof e o shah seam_ a t agent o umty at the ssite oT the work. Contract - The contract is comprised of the contract documents. Contract Documents - The contract documents include the agreement. notice to contractors. instructions to bidders, proposal, plans, general conditions. specifications, contract bonds, addenda, change orders, and supplementary agreements. Rev . 5/76 -24- • O0102 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS SECTION 1. Definitions: (tonins d) Contrc ator - The individual, partnership, corporation, association, o t venture, or any combination thereof, who has entered into a contract with the County. Cauia - Shall mean the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivsion of the State of California and party of the first part, or its duly authorized agent acting within the scope of their authority. Field Order - Is an instruction given daring the course of theowe we Section 16B). Gine awl Notes - The written instructions, provisions, conditions, or other requirements appearing on the drawings, and so identified thereon, which pertain to the performance of the work. Plans - The official drawings including plans, ele- vations, sections. detail drawings, diagrams, general notes, in- formation and schedules thereon, or exact reproductions thereof, adopted and approved by the County showing the location, character, dimension, and details of the work. S ecift t n The instructions, provisions, condi- tions and dela a re eamts pertaining to the methods and man- ner of perfotaing the work, or to the quaI�ities and quantities of work to be furnished and installed under this contract. Subcontractor -An individual, partnership, corporation. association, joint venture, or any combination thereof, who con- tracts with the Contractor to perform work or labor or render service in or about the work. The term subcontractors shall not include those who supply materials only. Superintendent -The representative of the Contractor who shall be present at the work site at all times during perform- ance of the work. Such Superintendent shall at all times be fully authorized to receive and act upon instructions for the Architect or his authorized agents and to execute and direct the work on be- half of the Contractor. SUPPIinea9M Agreement - A written agreement providing for alteration, nt, or extension of the contract. Work - The furnishing and installing of all labor, materials, art Iles, supplies. and equipment as specified, desig- nated, or required by the contract. Rev. 5/76 -Z5- _:. 00103 DIVISION F, GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 2. Governing[ Laws and Regulations: A. The Contractor shall keep informed of and observe, and comply with and cause all of his agents and em- ployees to observe and comply with all prevailing Federal and State laws, local ordinances, and rules and regulations made pursuant to said laws. which in any way affect the conduct of the work of this contract. B. All work and materials shall be in full accord- ance with the latest rules and regulations of the Uniform Building Code, the State Fire Marshal, the Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety, the National Electric Code, the Uniform Plumbing Code published by the Western Plumbing Officials Association, and other applicable State laws or regulations. Nothing in these Plans or Specifications is to be construed to permit work not conforming to these Codes. The Contractor shall keep copies of Codes on job at all times during construction period, C. Excerpts from Section 6422 of the Labor Code of the State of California are included below. The Contractor shall comply fully with this section of the Labor Code as applicable. "No contract forpnblic works involving an estimated expendtiure in excess of $25, .00 for the excavation of any trench or trenches five feet or more in depth, shall be awarded unless it contains a clause requiring submission by the Contractor and acceptance by the awarding body or by a registered civil or structural engineer, employed by the awarding body to whom authority to accept has been de legated,.in advance of ex- cavation, of a detailed plan ex- show the design of shoring, brae- Ing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection from the hazard of caving ground during the excavation of such trench or trenches. If such plan varies from the shoring system standards established by the Construction Safety Orders, the plan shall be prepared by a registered civil or structural engineer. "Nothiag in this section shall be deemed to allow the use of a shoring, sloping, or protective system less effective than that required by the Construction Safety Orders of the Division of Industrial Safety. "Nothing in this section shall be construed to impose tort liability on the awarding body or any of its employees. "She terms 'public works' and 'awarding body', as used in this section shall have the same meaning as in Labor Code See- tions 1720 and 1722 respectively." Rev. 5/76 -26- a 00104 *%The terns 'public narks' and 'awarding in Labor Cod Code Seeas - in in this section shall have the same meaning tions 1720 and ln2 respectively-" Rev. 5176 -26- 300104 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 3. Patents and Royalties: A. The Caatractor shall provide and pay for all licenses and royalties necessary for the legal use and operation of adv of the equipment or specialties used in the nark. Certificates shovin8 the Payment of any such licenses or royalties, and per- mits for the use of may patented or copyrighted devices shall be secured and paid for by the Contractor and delivered to the County on completion of the work, if required. SECTION 4. Cant�y �ctor's Heapaxusibility for Fork and Public Vt�Iities: A. She Fork: Until the formal acceptance of the work by the Camthe Contractor shall have the charge and care thereof and shall bear the risk ofinSury or damage to any part of the work by the action of the elements or from nay other cause ex- cept as provided in Section 23. The Contractor, at Contractor's cost, shall rebuild, sepsir. restore, and make good all such damages to any portion of the work occasioned by any of such causes before its accept- ance, B. Public Utilities: a. The Contractor shall send gxoper notices, make all necessary arrangements. and perform all other services required in the care and maintenance of all public utilities. The Con- tractor &ball assume all responsibility eaocerning same for which the County say be liable. b. Enclosing ar boxing in. for portection of any public utility equipment. *ball be doneby the Contractor. Upon comple- tion of the work. the Contractor *hail remove all enclosures, fill in all openings in masonry. grouting the same watertight, and leave in a finished condition. c. All connections to public utilities shall be asde and maintained in such maintained as not to interfere with the con- ti use of same by the County during the entire progress of the SECTIONS. Bond and Insurance: A. The Contractor to whom the work is awarded shall within five (5) working days after being notified enter into a contract with the owner an the Contra Costa County Standard Farm for the work in accordance with the drawing and Specifications, shall fur- nish and file at the same time labor and material and faithful per- fora&nce bonds as set forth in the advertisement for bids, on a foe acceptable to the County. Rev. 5176 -27- 00205 i DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 5. Bond and Insurance continued B. Comnensation Insurance: The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this Contract adequate Workmens' Compensation Insurance for all his employees employed at the site of the project, and in case any work is sublet, the Contract shall require the sub- contractor similarly to provide Workmens' Compensation Insurance for the latter's employees, unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by the Contractor. In case any class of employee engaged in hazardous work under the Contract at the site of the project is not protected under the Wor',aLens' Compensation statute, or in case there is no applicable Workmens' Compensation statute, the Contractor shall provide, and shall cause each subcontractor to provide, adequate insurance for the protection of his employees not otherwise pro- tected. C. Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance: The Contractor shall take out and maintain during the life of this contract such Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance, naming Contra Costa County as an additional insured, as shall protect him and any subcontractor performing work covered by this Contract, from.claims for damages for personal injury, in- cluding wrongful death, as well as from claims for property damage, ' which may arise from operations under this Contract, whether such operations be by himself or by any subcontractor or anyone directly I or indirectly employed by either of them. The amounts of such in- surance shall be as follows: Public Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $250,000.00 for injuries, including wrongful death, to any one person, and, subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less than $500,000.00 on account of one accident, and property damage insurance in an amount not less than $50,000.00. The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Liability Insurance which shall include the "hold harmless" agreement as re- quired in the Articles of Agreement. D. Fire Insurance: ' Omitted. -2s 0U106 a The Contractor shall submit a Certificate of Liability Insurance which shall include the "hold harmless" agreement as re- quired in the Articles of Agreement. D. Fire Insurance: ' Omitted. -28- V is 0U106 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION S. BOND AND INSURANCE (continued) E. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE• Certificates of such Workmen's Compensation, Public Liability. Property Damage Insurance, and Fire Insurance, shall be filed with the County and shall be subject to County approval for adequacy of protection. All certificates shall indicate that Contra Costa County has been named as an additional insured. These certificates shall contain a pprovision that coverage af- forded under the policies will not be cancelled until at least ten days' prior written notice has been given to Contra Costa County. F. PERFORMANCE BOND: t One bond shall be in the amount of One Hundred percent (1067.) of the Contract, and shall insure the Owner during the life of the Contract and for the term of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the work against faulty or improper mater- Isla or workmanship that may be discovered during that time. G. PAYMENT BOND: One bond shall be in the amount of fifty percent (50X) of the Contract price. and shall be in accordance with the laws of the State of California to secure the payment of all claims for labor and materials used or consumed in the performance of this contract and of all amounts under the Unemployment Insurance Act. SECTION 6. SUBCONTRACTING' A. The Contractor shall be responsible for all work per- formed under this contract, and no subcontractor will be recog- nized as such. A11 persons engaged in the work will be considered as employees of the Contractor. B. The Contractor shall give his personal attention to the ful- fillment of this contract and shall keep the work under his control. When any subcontractor fails to Prosecute a portion of the work in a manner satisfactory to the Architect or Engineer, the Contractor shall remove such subcontractor immediately upon written request of the Architect or Engineer and he shall not again be employed on the work. C. Although the specification sections of this contract may be arranged according to various trades, or general grouping of work, the contractor is not obligated to sublet the work in such manner. The County will not entertain requests to arbitrate dis- putes among subcontractors or between the Contractor and one or more subcontractors concerning responsibility for performing any part of the work. Rev. 5/76 -29- 00M d DIVISION F. GENERAL COMITIONS (Continued) SECTION d. Subcontracting (continued) D. Subletting or subcontracting any portion of the work as to which no subcontractor was designated in the original bid shall be permitted only in case of public emergency or necessity, and then only after a finding reduced to writing as public rec- ord of the awarding authority setting forth the facts constituting such emergency or necessity. E. Substitution of Subcontractors: Contractor shall not substitute any person or subcontractor in place of a subcontractor listed in his bid proposal without the written approval of the County. Substitution of subcontractors must be in accordance with the provisions of the "Subletting and Subcontracting Pair Practices Act" beginning with Section 4100 of the Government Code. Violations of this Act by the Contractor may subject him to penalties which any includa cancellation of contract, assessment of 10 percent of the subcontractor's bid, and disciplinary action by the Contractors' State License Board. SECTION 7. TIW OF WORK AND DAMAGES: A. The County will designate the starting day of the con- tract on which the Contractor shall immediately begin and thereafter diligently prosecute the work to completion. the Contractor obli- gates himself to complete the work on or before the date, or within the number of calendar days, set forth in the Proposal (Bid Form) for completion, subject only to such adjustment of time as may be set forth in this article or pursuant to Section 21. B. If the work is not completed within the time required, doge will be sustained by the County. It is and will be impract- icable and extremely difficult to ascertain and determine the actual damage which the County will sustain by reason of such delay; and it is therefore agreed that the Contractor will pay to the County the sum of money stipulated per day in the Specifications for each and every day's delay in finishing the vomit beyond the time pres- cribed. If the Contractor fails to pay such liquidated damages the County nay deduct the amount thereof from any son" due or that may became due the Contractor under the contract. C. The work shall be regarded as completed upon the date the County has accepted the same in vritinx. D. Written requests for contract time extensions. along with adequate justification. shall be submitted to the County not later than one month following the delay. E. Any money due, or to become due the Contractor, may be retained to cover said liquidated damages and should such money not be sufficient to cover such damages, the County shall have the right to recover the balance from the Contractor or his sureties. Rev. 5/76 -30- 00108 , )it.; 'i i than one swath following the delay. E. Any money due, or to become due the Contractor, be sinfficientover to cover s dated damages and should I h cosy be to recover the balance f damages, the County shall have th�rig6t from the Contractor or his sureties. Rev. 5/76 -30- 001 os i DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (continued) SECTION 7. TIME OF WORK AND DAMAGES: (contineud) F. Should the County, for any cause, authorize a sus- pension of work, the time of such suspension will be added to the time allowed for completion. Suspension of work by order of the County shall not be deemed a waiver of the claim of the County for damages for non-completion of the work after the adjusted time as required above. SECTION 8. PROGRESS SCHEDULE: Prior to beginning work the Contractor shall submit to the County a practicable progress schedule of operations on a chart form approved by the County. She schedule of operations shall show the order in which the Contractor proposes to carry out the work. the dates on which he will start each major sub- division of the work. and the coat fated dates of completion of such subdivision. When req :edmd r the County, The contractor shall submit an adjusted progress schedule on the approved form to reflect changed conditions- (Normally a new schedule will be requested when schedule is more than thirty (30)" days in error.) SECTION 9. TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND FACILITIES: A. All water used on the work will be furnished and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall furnish the necessary temporary piping from the distribution point to the points on the site where water is necessary to carry on the work and upon com- pletion of the work shall remove all temporary piping. B. The Contractor, at his own cost. shall furnish and in- stall all mecers.all electric light andpower equipment and wiring, all gas meters. gas equipment and piping that is necessary to per- form his work and shall remove the same upon the completion of the work. She Contractor shall pay for all power. light and gas used in the construction work. C. The Contractor shall furnish, wire for, install and main- tain temporary electric light wherever it is necessary toreside illumination for the Q performance and/or inspection of the work. The lighting shall provide sufficient illumination and shall be so placed and distributed that these Specifiatioas can be easily read in place where said work is being performed. This tem- porary light equipment may be moved about but shall be maintained throughout the work. available for the use of the Engineer. Project Inspector, or any other authorized representative of the County whenever required for inspection. Rev. 5/76 -31- 00109 '': DIVISION F. GD RAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 9. TEKPORARY UTILITIES AND FACILITIES (Continued) D. The Contractor shall provide and maintain for the duration of the work, temporary toilet facilities for the work- men, These facilities shall be of an approved type conforming to the requirements of the County Health Department, and shall be weathertight structures with raised floors. Structures are to have adequate light and ventilation and door equipped with latch or lock. Contractor shall service such facilities daily, maintaining same in a clean and sanitary condition. Portion of site occupied by toilet facilities shall be graded and cleaned up upon removal of facilities when so ordered and/or upon completion of work. E. The County will p_ar directly to the utility companies connection fees, ani%r=Z £ees, permit fees. acreage fees, and all other fees required by the utility companies and associated with the permanent utility services. If additional fees associ- ated with the temporary services are required they will be paid by the Contractor. The County will not for water, gas, tele- phone and electricity consumed m the pproject until after the County makes written request to the utility companies that bil- lings be sent to the County. (Normally the County will make these requests after the project is accepted as complete.) F. See Special Conditions for Variations to the above requirements. SECTION 10. Pyr : A. The Contractor shall make application for all permits, that are required for the performance of his work by all lava, ordinances, rules, regulations, or orders, of any body lawfully empowered to make or issue the same and having jurisdiction, and shall give all notices necessary in connection therewith. The Contractor is not�requir�ed to pay any charges associated with per- mits. (It is me tie present policy of the County to pay fees to the incorporated cities for peasits.) SECTION 11. CONDUCT OF WORK: A. The Contractor shall observe that the County reserves the right to do other work in connection with the project by Con- tract or otherwise, and he shall at all times conduct his work so as to impose no hardship on the County or others engaged in the work. He shall adjust. correct and coordinate his work with the work of others so that no discrepancies shall result in the whole work. B. The Contractor shall provide an adequate work force, materials of proper quality, and equiRqkent to properly carry on the work and to insure completion of each part in accordance with his schedule and with the time agreed. Rev. 5/76 -32- 00110 1 1 t t i 1 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 11. CONDUCT OF HORS: C. The Contractor shall personally superintend the work and shall maintain a competent superintendent or foreman at all times until the job is accepted by the County. This superintennent shall be empowered to act in all matters pertaining to the work. D. Daily Manpower Reports shall be signed by the Contractor, or his Superintendent, and submitted weekly. E. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall clear all obstructions and prepare the site ready for the construction, He shall verify dimensions and scale of plot plans, and shall check all dimensions, levels, and construction. F. Where rrew of otrade joins, or is on other work, there shall ' total project nis discrepancy or incomplete portions when the p j complete. In engaging one kind of work with another, marring or damaging same will not be permitted. .Should lts in ddamsgree orrddefecctk or s,the whotrade le work affecovered eccteedd shall be madther which e good by the Contractor without expense to the County. } G. The Contractor shall anticipate the relations of the various trades to progress of the work and shall see that required anchorage or blocking is furnished and setat proper times. An- chorage and blocking for each trade shall be a part of same, ex- cept where stated otherwise. H. Proper facilities shall be provided at all times for access of the County representatives to conveniently ezamdne and ( inspect the work_ I. Watchmen, at Contractor's option, shall be maintained during the progress of the work as required, at the expense of the Contractor. J. If any subcontractor or person employed by the Contractor shall appear to the Engineer to be incompetent or to act in a dis- orderly or improper manner. he shall be discharged immediately on the written request of the Engineer/Architect, and such person shall not again be employed on the work. SECTION 12. RESPONSffiILIIY FOR SITE CONDTIIONSe The following shall constitute exceptions, and the sole exceptions, to the responsibility of the Contractor set forth in Section 4. in the Instructions to Bidders: r A. If during the course of the work the Contractor encount- ers active utility installations which are not shown or indicated in the plans or in the specifications, or which are found in a location substantially different from that shown, and such utilities are not reasonably apparent from visual examination, then he shall Rev. 5/76 -33- 00111 li - _ iii, K contractor set forth in Section 6, in the Instructions to Bidders: encount- ersf during the course of the work the Contractor activeIutiilitty installations which are not sham or indicated in the plans or in the specifications. or which are found in a location substantially different from that shown, and such utilities are not reasonably apparent from visual examination, then he shall Rev. 5175 -33- 4 00111 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) SECTION 12. RESPONSIBILM FOR SIVE (continued) promptly notify the County in writing. Where necessary for the work of the contract. the County shall issue a written order to the Contractor to make such adjustment, rearrangement. repair, removal, alteration, or special handling of such utility, including repair of the damaged utility. For the purposes of the foregoing. "active" shall mean other than abandoned, and "utility installations" $hall include the following: Steam. petroleum products air, chemical, water, sewer, storm water, gas, electric, and teiephone pipe lines or conduits. The Contractor shall perform the work described in such written order and compensation therefor will be made in accord- ance with Section 21. relating to changes in the work. Except for the items of cost specified in such Sections, the Contractor shall receive no compensation for nay other cost, damsga or delay to his due to the presence of such utility. If the Contractor fails to give the notice specified above and thereafter acts with- out instructions from the County, then he shall be liable for any or all damage to such utilities or other work of the contract which arises from his operations subsequent to discovery thereof, and he shall repair and make good such damage at his own cost. B. If the contract requires excavation or other work to a stated limit of excavation beneath the surface. and if during the course of the work theununtt�yr orders a change of depth or dimen- sions of such subsurface work due to discovery of unsuitable bearing material or for any other cause. then adjustment to con- tract price for such change will be made in accordance with Sec- tion 21. Except for the items of cost specified therein, the Con- tractor shall receive no compensation for any other cost, damage, or delay to his due to the presence of such unsuitable bearing material or other obstruction. SECTION 13, INSPECTION: A. She Contractor shall at x11 times permit the County and their authorized agents to visit and inspect the work or any part thereof and the shops where work is in preparation. This obli- gacion sball include maintaining proper facilities and safe access for such inspection. Where the contract requires work to be tested, it shall not be covered up until inspected and approved by the County, and the Contractor stall be solely responsible for notify- ing the Coun►y where and when such work is in readiness for inspec- tion and testing. Should any such work be covered without such test and approval, it shall be uncovered at the Contractor's ex- pense. B. Whenever the Contractor intends to perform work on Saturday. Sunday. or a legal holiday, he stall give notice to the County ..- -,Ach intention at least two working days prior to performing such work. or such otter period as may be speci- fied, so that the County may make necessary arrangements. Rev. 5176 -34- 00112 1 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Continued) _ SECTION 13. INSPECTION: (Continued) C. The inspection of the work or materials shall not relieve the Contractor of any of his obligations to fulfill his contract as prescribed. Work and materials not meeting ouch requireamcs shall be made good and unsuitable work or materials any be rejected, notwithstanding that such work or materials have been previously inspected or that payment has been made. SECTION 14. REJECTIONS OF NATERIALS: A. The Contractor shall promptly remove from the premises all materials condemned by the County as failing to conform to the Contract, whether incorporated in the work or not. and the Contractor shall promptly replace and reexecute his own work in accordance with the Contract and without expense to the County and shall bear the expense of making good all work of other Contractors destroyed or damaged by such removal. B. If the Contractor does not remove such condemned work and materials within reasonable time, fixed by written notice, the County may remove then and say store the materials at the expense of the Contractor. If the Contractor does not pthe expenses of such removal within ten (10) days thereafter, the County may upon ten (10) days written notice, sell such materials at auction or at private sale and shall account for the net pro- ceeds thereof after deducting all costs and expenses that stpAd have been borne by the Contractor. SECTION 15. INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS: A. Correlation: The contract documents shall be interpreted as being complementary in requiring a complete work ready for use and occupancy or, if not to be occupied. operation. Any require- ment occurring in any one of the documents is as binding as through occurring in all. B. Conflicts in the Contract Documents: In the event of conflict in the contract documents the priorities stated in sub- divisions 1. 2, 3. and 4 below shail govern: 1. Addenda shall govern aver all other contract doucments, except the County s Standard Fors Agreement unless it is specifically indicated that such addenda shall prevail. Subsequent addenda shall govern over prior addenda only to _ the extent specified. 2. In case of conflict between plans and specifi- cations. the specifications shall govern. 3. Conflict within the Plans: a. Schedules. when identified as such, shall govern over all other portions of the plans. b. Specific Notes, shall govern aver all other nates and all other portions of the plans. c. Larger scale drawings shall govern over smaller scale drawings. -35- t 00113 DIVISICR F. GEM.AL CMITIGNS (Can't.) SECTICN IS, IVTEZPRETATION OF CONTRACT REODIREhENNTS: (=on't.) L. Conflicts within the Specifications: a. The "General Conditions of the Contract" shall govern over all sections of the specifications except for specific modifications thereto that may be stated in the Special Conditions. b. Omissions: If the contract documents are not complete as to any minor detail of a required construction system or with regard to the manner of combining or Installing of parts. materials, or equipment, but there exists an accepted trade standard for good and workmanlike construction, such detail shall be deemed to have been impliedly required by the contract documents in accordance with such standard. "`linar detail" shall Include the concept of substantially Identical components, where the price of each such component Is small even though the aggregate cost or importance Is substantial, and shall include a sintle component which is incidental, even though Its cost or importance may be substantial. The quality and quantity of the parts or material so supplied shall conform to trade standards and be compatible with the type. composition. strength, size, and profile of the parts or materials otherwise set forth in the contract documents. SECTION 16, CIA1RIFICATIONS AND ADDITIONAL IhtSTROCTICN: A. Notification by Contractor: Should the Contractor discover any conflicts, omissions, or errors in the contract documents or have any question concerning interpretation or clarification of the contract documents, or If It appears to his that the work to be done or any matters relative there- to are not sufficiently detailed or explained In the contract documents. then, before proceeding with the work affected, he shall Immediately notify the County In writing through the Construction Supervisor, and request Interpreta- tion. clarification or furnishing of additional detailed Instructions concerning the work. All such questions shall be resolved and instructions to the Contractor issued within a reasonable time by the County, whose decision shall be final and conclusive. Should the Contractor proceed with the work affected before receipt of Instructions from the County, he shall remove and replace or adjust any work which is not in accordance therewith and he shall be responsible for any resultant damage, defect or added cost. B. Field Orders: During the course of the work the Architect and/or Engineer any issue Field Orders regarding the work. These Field Orders will supplement the Plans and Specifications in order to clarify, the intent of the contract documents by adjustment to meet field coneitions or to make the various phases of the work meet and join properly. A Field Order involves no change in contract time or price. Performance, partially or in full, of a Field Order shall constitute a waiver of claim for a change in contract time or price for the work covered by the Field Order, unless a change Order has been issued. C. Change Orders: See Section 21, this Division. Rev.12 172 —36— O0114 DIVISIONF. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Coni.) SECTION 17. PRODUCr AND REFERENCE STANDARDS: A. Product Designation: When descriptive catalogue designations, including manufacturer's name, product brand new, or model number are referred to in the contract documents, such designations shall be considered as being those found in industry publications of current issue at date of first invitation to bid. B. Reference Standards: When standards of the Federal Government, trade societies, or trade associations are referred to in the contract documents by specific date of issue, these shall be considered a pan of this contract. When such references do not bear a date of issue, the current published edition at date of first invitation to bid shall be considered as part of chis contract. SECTION 18. MATERIALS, ARTICLES. AND EQUIPMENT: A. Material atoll be new and of quality specified. When not particularly specified, material shall be the best of its class or kind. The Contractor shall, if required, submit satisfactory evidence as to the kind and quality of material. Price, fitness and quality being equal, preference shall be given to products made in California, in accordance with Section 4380 et seq., of the Government Code. State of California_ E. Mechanical equipment, fixtures and material shall be delivered . in original shipping crates to the job site and the County shall be notified of the receipt of such equipment, fixtures and material before uncrating. The County will, when desired, inspect such equipment, fixtures or material to determine any damage or deviation from that specified. Items damaged during delivery shall be rejected. C. Wherever the name or brand of a manufacturer's article is specified herein, it is used as a measure of quality and utility or a standard. If the Contractor desires to use any other brand or manufacture of equal quality and utility to that specified, he shall make application to the County in writing for any proposed substitutions. Such application shall be accompanied by evidence satisfactory to the County that the material or process is equal to Rev. 12172 -37- 00115 C aev. 12172 -37- 00115 DlrlSlc:i.F. GE,--.AL C(MITlu\'S (Const.) S_CTUN 18, `XTERIALS, ARTICLES, AND EQDIPMENr: (Coni.) that cpecified. Request for substitution shall be made In ample time for tLe County's consideration as no delay or extra time Will be allowed on account thereof. Evidence furnished to the County by the Contractor shall consist of adequate size samples of material, testing laboratory reports on material or process, manufacturer's specification data, field reports on Product's approval am use by other public agencies, material costs, and installation costs and waintenance provisions and experience or other data as required by the County. The County's decision concerning the refusal or acceptance of proposed substitute for that specified shall be accepted as final. Requests for substitution will only be considered when offered by the Contractor with the reason for substitution. 'Allure to submit competent evidence as required and requested by County shall be considered grounds for refusal of substitution. The Contractor shall include n notice of change in contract prices. If substitution is approved. D. All materials shall be delivered so as to insure a speedy and uninterrupted progress of ti-e work. Same shall be stored so as to cause no obstruction, and so as to prevent overloading of any portion of the structure. and the Contractor shall be entirely responsible for damage or loss by weat'+er or other cause. E. Within flfteen (15) days after the slanirm of the Contract, the Contractor shall submit for approval to the County a complete list of all materials it is proposed to use under this Contract, which differin any respect - from -materials specified. This list shall Include all materials which are proposes' by the subcontractors as well as by himself for use in work of his Contract and which are not specifically mentioned in the Specifications. This list must also include the figures received by the Contractor In bid form for the material or materials Which are submitted for approval or substitution• together with the figures in bid fors of the specified material or materials for which substitutions are proposed. Io case a substitute Is offerdd and accepted as approved equal to materials specified, the cost of which is less than the cost of the material or equipment specified, then a credit shall be taken for the difference between the two costs in order that the County shall obtain whatever benefits may be derived from the substitution. Failure to propose the substitution of any article within thirty-five (35) days after the signing of the Contract may be deemed sufficient cause for the denial of request for substitution. _iSCrim 19, SHOP DRAWINGS, DESCRIPTIVE DATA. SAMPLES, ALTERNATIVES: A• The Contractor shall submit promptly to the County, so as to cause no delay In the work, all shop drawings, descriptive data and samples for the various trades as required by the specifications, and offers of alter- natives. If any. Such submittals&ball be checked and coordinated by the Contractor with the work of other trades involved before they are submitted to the County for examination. Rev. 12/72 -38- 00111 i i DIVISION f. GENERAL CMMMONS (Can't.) SECTION 14. SHOP DRAWINGS DESCRIPTIVE DATA SAMPLES, ALTERNATIVES: (Caa't.) g. The Contractor &hail submit to the County shop or diagram drawings in the number of copies as required in submittal schedule, or five (5) copies if no schedule is included in these documents. The drawings shall show completely the work to be done; any error or omission shall be side good by the Contractor at his own expense, even though the work be installed before sass becomes apparent, as approval by the County covers general layout only. Fabrication, details and inspection shall conform to approved Contract Drawings. C. Descriptive Data: Subaft sets of manufacturer's brochures or other data required by the specifications in the number of copies as required in submittal schedule, or five (5) copies if no schedule is included in these documents. The County will examine such subsittais, noting thereon corrections, and return three copies with a letter of transmittal indicating actions taken by the County or required of the Contractor. D. Samples: Submit samples of articles, materials or equipment am required by the specifications. The work shall be In accordance with the approval of the samples. Samples shall be removed from County property when directed. Samples not removed by the Contractor, at the County's option, will become the property of the County or will be removed or disposed of by the County at Contractor's expense. E. Alternatives: For coaveniance In designation on the plans or In the specifications, certain materials. articles, or equipment may be designated by a brand or trade name or the name of the manufacturer together with catalog designation or other Identifying Information, hereinafter referred to gsnsrically as "designated by brand name". An alternative material, article. or equipment which is of equal quality and of the required characteristics for the purpose intended may be proposed for use provided the Contractor complies with the following requirements: 1. The Contractor shall submit his proposal for an alternative In writing within the time limit designated in the specifications, or if not designated, then within a period which will cause no delay in the work. 2. No such proposal will be considered unless accompanied by complete information. and descriptive data, necessary to determine the equality of the offered material&, articles, or equipment. Samples shall be provided when requested by the County. The Contractor shall note that the burden of proof as to the comparative quality or suitability of the offered materials, articles, or equip- mat shall be upon the Contractor. The County shall be the sole judge as to such matters. In the event that the County rejects the use of such alternative materials, articles, or equipment, then one of the particular products designated by brand max shall be furnished. Rev., 12472. -39- 0011-7 1 i The Contractor shall note that the burden of proof as to the comparative quality or suitability of the offered materials, articles, or equip- ment shall be upon the Contractor. The County shall be the sole Judge as to such matters. In the event that the County rejects the use of such alternative materials, articles, or equipment, then one of the particular products designated by brand name stall be furnished. Rev. 2472 _3 9_ 0011 l DiY1S1(":F, GE1X:'_%L ax)irios (con-t.) +ECTIiS 19, 39cP J4AIi1N S, D=SCRIPTIVE DATA. iAMPLzS, ALTEAMTIVEi• (Coni.) The Zounry will examine, with reasonable promptness, such submittals, and return of submittals to the Contractor shall not relieve the Contractor from responsibility for deviations and alternatives !ros the contract Plans and specifications, nor shall it relieve him from responsibility for errors in the submittals. A failure by the Contractor to identify In his letter of transmittal material deviations from the plans and Specifications shall void the submittal and any action taken thereon by the County. When specifically requested by the County, the Contractor shall resubmit such shop "ravings, descriptive data, and samples as may be required. If any mechanical, electrical, structural, or other changes are required for the proper installation and fit of alternative materials. articles, or equipment, or because ofdevlations from the contract plans and specifications, such chances shall not be made without the consent of the County and shall be made without additional cost to the County. SECTICN 20, SAMPLES A]'D TESTS: " The County reserves the right at its own expense to order tests of any part or the work- If as a result of any such test the work is found unacceptable. It will be rejected and any additional test required by the County shall be at Contractor's expense. Unless otherwise directed, all samples for testing will be taken by the County from the materials, articles or equipment delivered, or from work performed, and tests will be under the super- vision of, or directed by, and at such places as may be convenient to the County. Materials. articles, and equipment requiring tests shall be delivered in amply time before intended use to allow for testIng. and none may be used before receipt of written approval by the County. Any sample delivered to the County or to the premises for examination, including testing, shall be disposed of by the Contractor at his own expense within not more than ten (10) days after the Contractor acquires knowledge that such examination is concluded, unless otherwise directed by the County. SECTION 2 L CHANCE ORDERS: The County reserves the right to order in writing changes in the plans and specifications, without voiding the contract, and the Contractor shall comply with such order. No change or deviation from the plans and specifications will be made without authority in writing from the County. Banged work shall be performed In accordance with the original requirements of the Contract Documents and previous fully executed Change Orders. A Change Order may adjust the contract price either upward or down- ward in accordance with either or a combination of the following bases, as the County may elect: (1) On a lump sun basis as supported by breakdown of estimated costs. Rev. 12/72 —40- 00118 DIVISION F. GENERAL COhD7ITIONS (Can't.) SECTION 21. CHANGE ORDERS: (Can't.) (2) on a unit price basis. (3) On a cost-plus basis in accordance with the following conditions: (a) MARK-OPS' 1. For work performed by the General Contractor an amount equal to the direct cost (as defined herein) of the work plus 15%of the direct costa for overhead and profit. 2. For work performed by a sub-contractor an amount equal to the direct costs (as defined berein) of the work plus 20%of the direct costs for overhead and profit. (Suggested breakdown: In to the sub-contractor, 5% to General Contractor.) 3. For work performed by a sub-sub-contractor an amount equal to the direct costs (as defined herein) of the work plus 25%of the direct costs for overhead and profit. (Suggested breakdown: 15Z to sub-sub-contractor, 5%to sub-contractor, 5Z to General Contractor.) 4. In no use will the total mark-up be greater than 25% of the direct costs notwithstanding the number of contract tiers actually existing. 5. For deleted work the mark-up shall be 10%of the direct costs or the agreed upon estimate thereof. (b) DIRECT COSTS- 1. Labor: The costs for labor shall include any employer payments to or an behalf of the workmen for health and welfare, pension, vacation and similar purposes. Labor rates' will not be recognized when in excess of those prevailing in the locality and time the work is being performed. 2. Materials: The actual cost to the Contractor for the materials directly required for the performance of the changed work. Such cost of materials may include the cost of procurement, transportation and delivery if necessarily incurred. If a trade discount by the actual supplier is available to the Contractor, it shall be credited to the County. If the materials are obtained from a supply or source owned wholly or in part by the Contractor, payment therefore will not exceed the current wholesale price for such materials. The term "trade discount" includes the concept of cash discount. Rev.1-7/72 Rev. -41- 00119 DIVISION F. Gr_4ML CONDITIONS (Con't.) SECTION 21. CHANGE ORDERS: (Con't.) . 2. Materials: (Con't.) If, in the opinion of the County, the cost of materials is excessive, or if the contractor fails to furnish satisfactory evidence of the cost to him from the actual supplier thereof, then in either case the cost of the materials shall be deemed to be the lowest current wholesale price at which similar materials are available in the quantities required. The County reserves the right to furnish such materials as it deems advisable, and the Contractor shall have no claims for costs or profits on material furnished by the County. 3. Equipment: The actual cost to the Contractor for the use of equipment directly required in the performance of the changed work. In computing the hourly rental of equipment, any time less than 30 minutes shall be considered one-half hour. No payment will be made for time while equipment is inoperative due to breakdowns or for non-working days. In addition, the rental time shall include the time required to move the equipment to the work from the nearest available source for rental of such equipment, and to return it to the source. If such equipment is not moved by its own power, then loading and transportation costs will be paid in lieu of rental time therefor. However, neither moving time nor loading and transportation costs will be paid if the equipment is used on the project in any other way than upon the changed work. Individual pieces_f equipment having a replacement value of 51,000 or less : shall be considered to be tools or small equipment, and no—payment 711 be made therefor. For equipment owned, furnished, or rented by the Contractor, no cost therefor shall he recognized in excess of the rental rates established by distributors or equipment rental agencies in the locality where the work is performed. The amount to be paid to the Contractor for the use of equipment as set forth above shall constitute full compensation to the Contractor for the cost of fuel, power, mit, lubrication, supplies, small tools, small equipment, necessary attachments, repairs and maintenance of say kind, depreciation, storage, insurance, labor (except for equipment operators), and any and all costs to the Contractor incidental to the use of such equipment. (c) ALIi12ABLE TIHE EXTENSIONS: For any change in the work, the r_ontractor shalt be entitled only to such adjustments in time by which completion of the entire work is delayed due to performance of the changed work. .".ach estimate for a change in the work submitted by the Contractor shall state the amount of extra time that he considers should be allowed for making the requested change. Rev. 12/72 _42_ 00120 i l 1L-.L.a1L7..lt r . For any change in the work, the contractor shall be entitled only to such adjustments in time by which completion of the entire work is delayed due to performance of the changed work. Fach estimate for a change in the work submitted by the Contractor shall state the amount of extra time that he considers should be allowed for inking the requested change. Rev. 12/72 -42- 00120 DIRISIOn f. GENERA.t)0¢ornotis (Con't-) SECTUIN 21. CHANGE ORDERS: (Con't.) (d) REGARDS AND SUPPORTIVE INFORMATION: (1) She Contractor shall maintain his records in such a manner as to provide a clear distinction between the direct costs of extra work paid for on a cost-plus basis and the costs of other operations. (2) Contractor shall maintain daily records abowing man hours and material quantities required for cost plus work. The Contractor shall use a form approved or provided by the Camty. The forms will be filled out in duplicate and the County-s inspector will review and attach his approving s tort to the farm oa the!aX the work is performed. (3) Rental and material charges shall be substantiated by valid copies of vendor's invoices. (G) She contractor's cost records pertaining to cost-plus work shall be open to inspection or audit by the County. (a) FAIXME M AGREE AS TO COST- Notwithstanding the failure of the County and the Contractor to agree as to cost of the proposed change order- the Contractor, upon written order from the County shall proceed immediately with the changed work. Daily job records shall be kept as indicated in Paragraph (d) above and when agreed to by the Contractor and the construction inspector, it shall become the basis for payment of the changed work. Agreement and execution of the daily job record by the construction inspector shall not preclude subsequent adjustment based upon a later audit by the County. Rev. L02 -43 O0121 ............. DIVISIO%F. GENERAL ODNDITIONS (Con't.) SECTIOs 22. LABOR: Every part of the work shall be accomplished by workmen, laborers, or mechanics especially skilled in the class of work required and workmanship shall be the best. SECTION 23, OCCCPANCY BY THE COUNTY PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE: The County reserves the right to occupy all or any part of the project prior to completion of the work, upon written order therefor. In such event, the Contractor will be relieved of responsibility for any injury or damage to such part as results from such.eecupancy and use by the County. Such occupancy does not constitute acceptance by the County of the work or any portion thereof, nor will it relieve the Contractor of responsibility for correcting defective work or materials found at any time before the acceptance of the work as set forth in Section 24 or during the guaranty period after such acceptance. as set forth in Section 28. SECTION 24, PRESERVATION AND CLEANING: A. The Contractor shall protect and preserve the work from all damage or accident, providing any temporary roofs, window and door coverings, boxings or other construction as required by the County. This shall include any adjoining property of the County and others. B. The Contractor shall properly clean the work as it progresses. As directed during construction, rubbish shall be removed, end at completion the whole work shall be cleaned and all temporary construction, equipment and rubbish shall be removed from the site, all being left in a clean and proper condition satisfactory to the County. SECTION 25, PAYMENT OF FEDERAL OR STATE TAXES: Any Federal. Stare or local tax payable on articles furnished by the Contractor, under the Contract, shall be included in the Contract price and paid by the Contractor. The County will furnish Excise Tax Exemption Certificates to the Contractor for any articles which are required to be furnished under the Rev. 12172 —44- 00122 DIVISION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Can't.) SECTION 25. PAYKWr OF FEDERAL OR STATE TAXES: (Can't) Contract and which are exempt from Federal Excise Tax. SECTION 26. ACCEPTANCE: A. The work shall be accepted in writing only when it s shall have been completed satisfactorily to the County. Partial payments shall not be construed as acceptance of any part of the work. B. In judging the work no allowance for deviations from the drawings and Specifications will be made, unless already approved in writing at the time and in the manner as called for heretofore. C. County shall be given adequate opportunity to make any necessary arrangeme--s for fire insurance and extended coverage. D. Final acceptance of the Contract will not be given until all requirements of the contract documents are complete and appproved by the County. This shall include, but is not limited to, all construction, guarantee forms, parts list, schedules, tests, operating instructions, and as-built drawings - all as required by the contract documents. SECTION 27. FINAL PAYMENT AND WAIVER TO CLAIMS: After the official acceptance of the work by the County, the Contractor shall submit to the County, on a form acceptable to the County, a request for payment in full in accordance with the contract. The form"Statement to Accompany Final Payment" (Page q1 ) shall be completed, signed by the Contractor, and submitted to the County with the final payment request. SECTION 28. GOARAhTEE: A. The Contractor hereby unconditionally guarantees that the work will be done in accordance with requirements of all con- tract, and further guarantees the work of the contract to be and remain free of defects in workmanship and materials for a period of one year from the date of acceptance of the contract, unless a longer guarantee period is specifically called for. The Contractor hereby agrees to repair or replace any and all work, together with any other adjacent work which may be displaced in so doing, that any prove to be not in its workmanship or material within the guar- antee period specified, without any expense whatsoever to the County, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted. B. Contract bonds are in full force and effect during the guarantee period. C. The Contractor further agrees, that within 10 calen- dar days after being notified in writing by the County ofwork not in accordance with the requirements of the contract or a Rev. 5/76 -45- 00123 D SION F. GENERAL CONDITIONS (Con't) SECTION 28. GUARANTEE (con't.) defects in the work. he will commence and prosecute with due diligence all work necessary to fulfill the term of this guarantee. and to complete the work within a reasonable period of tile. and in the event he fails to so comply. he does heseby authorize the County to proceed to have such work done at ehe Contractor's espense and he will pay the cost thereof upon de- sand. The CotmGy shall be entitled to all costs. including reasonable attorney's fees. necessarily incurred upon the con- tractor's refusal to pay the above costs. Notvitbataading the foregoing par mph, is the event of as emergency aoastittnting an isediate d to the health safety of the County's e�ployees. property. or licen- seas. the County may imdertaka at the Contractor's ezpease with- out prior notice all cork necessary to correct such hazardous conditions whma it was caused b7 work of the Contractor not being in accordance with the regniraaeats of this contract. D. The general contractor and each of the listed sub- contractors shall execute and furnish the County with the standard guarantee fore. (see rase 4S )- Rev. 5/76 -46- 00124 'yA�PN. y•; F-X.NMI'Lt i Rev. 5/76 -46- I 00124 CUAIANM FOE OOHrM OOSTA (OMIT BUILDING MAXrD=, CALIFORNIA we hereby guarantee to the County of Contra Costa the -. (Type of Vork which we have installed in the (Ileac of Building) California, for year (s) use from date of filing of the completion notice In the Office of the County Recorder. We agree to repair or replace to the satisfaction of the County say or all such work that may prove defective to workmanship or materials within that period, ordinary wear and tear and unusual abuse or neglect excepted, together with any other work which any be damaged or displaced in so doing. If we fail to comply with the above mentioned conditions within a reasonable time after being notified in writing, we, collectively and separately, do hereby authorise the owner to proceed to have the defects repaired and made good at our expense and we will pay the costa sad charges therefore immediately upon des". This guarantee covers and Includes any special terms, including time periods, specified for this work or materials in the plans and specifications for this project. i This guarantee supersedes any previous guarantees we have made for this particular project. SUBCOM UCTOE Date: (Affix Corporate Seal) CENML CONTRACTOR Date: (Affix Corporate Seal) NOTE: If the firm is not a corporation, add a paragraph stating the type of business organization and the capacity and authority of the person signing the guarantee. Rev. 12/72 r -47- 00110 i CCX4MPLf� FORM STATEM M TO ACCOMPANY FINAL PAYMUT To: Contra Costa County Public Works Department County Adainistration Building Martinez, California Re: Final Payment (Project) Dear Sir: The undersigned Contractor represents and agrees that the final payment includes herein all claim and demands, of whatever nature, which he has or may have against the County of Contra Costa in connection with the contract to construct the above-entitled project, and that payment by the County of the final estimate shall discharge and release it from any and all claims. The undersigned hereby certifies that all work, labor, and materials' on this project have been furnished and purchased in full compliance with the contract and with all applicable laws and regulations. The undersigned states that his claim for final payment is true and correct, that no part has been theretofore paid, and that the amount therein is justly due. I declare ander penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at (city) California. Rev. 12/72 -48- 00123 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel DIVISION G. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. All existing equipment, partitions, hardware, and other miscellaneous items which are dismantled or removed and not re-used shall remain the property of the County and shall be delivered to the Building Maintenance Warehouse, 1619 Shell Avenue, Martinez, unless otherwise noted. 2. Water and electrical power are available and may be used by the Contractor's forces at no cost to the Contractor. The Contractor shall provide approved connections to utilities and shall remove same at completion of work. 3. The Contractor and his forces may use the public toilet facilities in the building. 4. The Contractor and his forces may park in unreserved County parking lots on a space-available basis. No parking in lot adjacent to jail. 5. All necessary arrangements to reserve on-street parking shall be made by the Contractor with the City of Martinez. 6. All work shall be accomplished in strict compliance with all applicable building codes, ordinances and regulations. 7. If during the work the Contractor or his forces mar, damage, or deface County property, such shall be cleaned, repaired, replaced, or otherwise restored by the Contractor to substantially original condition at no cost to the County. 8. The Contractor shall maintain a clean and protected operation. Floors shall be kept clean, and all debris and waste shall be collected and removed at the close of each working day. 9. All installations shall be per the respective manufacturer's recommendations -or these specifications and the higher standard shall prevail. 10. Building Permits will be obtained by the County at no cost to the Contractor. Contractor shall obtain all other permits and licenses required. 11. No service shall be shut down, transferred or otherwise interrupted without first being scheduled to be done at a time agreeable to Owner with two (2) working days notice. 12. When utilities are accidentally or inadvertently interrupted, they shall' be immediately restored to service prior to continuation of any other work under the Contract, regardless of the hour of occurrence. 13. A BID WALK IS SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 19, 1976, at 10 a.m. ALL CONTRACTORS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN REVIEWING THE PROJECT AREAS ARE INVITED TO ATTEND. CONTRACTORS SHOULD ASSEMBLE AT ROOM 107, COUNTY COURTHOUSE. 00121 -49- 1 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel weft. 14. Any questions regarding the project 90K be handled by the Building ® Projects Division at telephone 372-2146. 15. No additional compensation will be paid for overtime work scheduled for the convenience of the Contractor. Overtime required due to County requirements may be scheduled, and if so, the overtime differential will be paid by the County. Two (2) work day notice will be required for all overtime scheduling. 16. All work shall be done in strict conformity with all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. 17. In as much as this project is less than $50,000 the formal requirements for an Affirmative Action Plan, Section E of General Conditions are Waived. 18. Data Processing Operations: The Data Processing area is in operation 24 hours per day, Monday through Friday. Saturday operation is scheduled from 12:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and from 6:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. Sunday operation is scheduled from 12:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. and from 6:00 p.m. until 11:59 p.m. This schedule gh■id-not be re-arranged or interrupted UALL( All lines, equipment, controls, or any other related work shall be installed and fully tested during standard working hours, 8 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. All new systems equipment, ductwork, controls, or related work shall be tied into the existing systems during the inactive periods on Saturday and Sunday. No other time can be made available for this work. The County shall be notified 2 full working days prior to any interruption of any existing data processing, mechanical, or electrical system related to the ongoing operations of the data processing operation. Any computer information lost, or equipment damaged, resulting from action by the contractor or his subcontractors will be replaced or repaired at no expense to the County. Welding, burning, or any work causing fumes or vapors cannot be done in the room during regular working hours. Doors to,Rooms B005 and 6004 must be kept closed except when used for entrance or exit. 19. A pre-construction conference will be held by the County with the Contractor prior to commencement of any work. 00128 _50— Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel DIVISION H SECTION l Technical Conditions - Plumbing and Mechanical I. General Conditions: . The General Conditions and General Require ants ar - n-rt C ti - „ UUU4a Lu nub J L JUJ and t$UU4 miust be kept closed except when used for entrance or exit. I 19. A pre-construction conference will be held by the County with the Contractor prior to commencement of any work. 00128 _50- Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel DIVISION H s'CTION 1 Technical Conditions - Plumbing and Mechanical 1. General Conditions: The General Conditions and General Requirements are a part of this Section as fully as if repeated herein. 2. Scope: Perform all work necessary and required for construction of the pro- ject as indicated. Such work includes but is not limited to the follow- ing: 1. Demolition and removal of abandoned lines, valves, etc. 2. Installing floor drains at new chiller room. 3. Constructing concrete housekeeping pad. 4. Installation of new 20-ton chiller and new 10-ton air handler. 5. Insulating all new lines. 6. Provide and install new pumps. 7. Paint and label all new lines. ! 8. Provide and install valves, thermometers, regulators, and all other items called for on plans. 9. Make penetrations, anchors, supports, as required for all plumbing, mechanical work. 10. Pneumatic tubing and other control work. 3. Work Included in Other Sections: 1. Electrical hookup of motors. 4. Mechanical Piping - General Responsibility for the actual layout of all piping rests with the Con- tractor who must determine at the building the best way to run lines - with provisions made for grade, support, expansion, vibration and noise; out of the way of air ducts, electrical conduits, plumbing, and fire sprinkler lines, equipment, and building openings. ! 00129 i� Finance Bldg. Air-Conditioning Remodel 5. Drawings: Submit for review, with sufficient "lead time" to prevent delay in this work or that of any other trade, the following: a. Detailed dimensioned layout drawings of all mechanical equipment rooms, and mechanical equipment areas. b. Shop drawings prepared by the Contractor under this Section for use in fabricating all duct work and mechanical piping. c. "Shop drawings", as specified herein. No mechanical work may start in the mechanical equipment rooms, nor may any duct work or mechanical piping be fabricated until such time as the above-specified drawings have been reviewed and approved. General arrangement only is intended by the drawings; the installations shall be made with provisions for grade, support, expansion, fibration, sound and Code regulations. "As-built" drawings of record shall be maintained at all times (and corrected daily), to show the exact location of piping, valves, clean- outs, duct work and equipment - as installed under Sections 15A and 15B. 6. Equipment Furnished by the County: The following equipment items will be provided bythe County. a. Chiller - 20 ton by Carrier, Model No. 30HH020, 208 volt, 3 phase. b. Air Handler, 10 ton by Carrier, Model No. 40RS012431, 208 volt, 3 phase, 3 horsepower. 7. Equipment Furnished by Contractor: a. All new equipment items shown on the plans not specifically called out or being provided by the County shall be provided by the Contractor. b. All miscellaneous and minor equipment items not shown but obviously necessary to provide a complete and operational facility shall be provided by the Contractor. 00130 • —52— ■ k Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel 8. Vibration Isolation and Sound Control: a. All piping and equipment furnished under this Division shall be in- stalled so that when in operation it will not create vibration or noise which the Architect/Engineer may judge to be objectionable to the building occupants, and the Work under these Sections shall be accomplished accordingly. Shop drawings shall be prepared by the Contractors under this Division (in conjunction with vibration isolation equipment manufacturer) as necessary to show load distribution and vibration isolation deflection of all resillently supported items - such as fans, pumps, and piping. b. The new air handler shall be mounted on isolators, with approved foundations and supports as specified herein. (1) Manufacturer's shop drawings and submittal data shall be suffi- ciently detailed to show locations of all isolators. (2) All isolators and hangers shall be tagged at the factory to show correct points of attachment. c. All equipment mounted on vibration isolator bases shall have a one- inch minimum operating clearance between such base and the floor or "housekeeping pad" beneath. Before turning on the respective equipment, such clearance space shall be checked to insure that no scrap, rubbish or hardware has been left which could possibly short-circuit the isolated ® base. d. Spring-type isolators, as specified, shall have bottom and top plates welded or otherwise positively attached (snap-in of springs into elasto- meric cups not acceptable) - isolators selected for minimum deflection of one inch or 95 per cent isolation efficiency (whichever yields great- est deflection) and so that a 25 percent overload capacity may be applied to the springs without their "bottoming out". All steelspring isolation units shall be furnished with neoprene pads - Kinetics - Model FES, or equal as approved: -t. Resilient Pads (at piping supports): Korfund 1/4 inch thick neoprene 6rpad-40' , or equal as approved; loaded to 30 psi. f. Mastic: Tremco Manufacturing Company!s "Mono"; that specified as '11-acoustical sealant": Tremco white "acoustical sealant" - gun-grade type; all applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. g. Installation: (1) Fabricate and install attachments from hangers to isolating equip- ment so as to result in minimum vibration. (2) Isolate all pipe risers connected to pump or refrigeration equipment through the installation of flexible connector. Mercer Rubber Co. - Vibraflex pipe, or approved equal. • 00131 —53— Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel 8. Continued S (3) Wherever possible, support piping running through gypsum board partitions from concrete or structural steel members - supports for piping up to and including 3-inch size isolated with two layers of 1/4 inch thick resilient pads; larger pipes with pads to thickness of 1-inch. 9. Inserts, Piping Supports: a. Where no building structural members are available at desired points of support, install auxillary steel members as required. b. Chains, wires, nails, wood blocking or perforated strap hangers ("plumbers tape") will not be permitted for supporting or securing Piping- c. Where piping is supported from an existing slab, use expansion shields Vother approved-type anchor f a, ate size to support piping. 0 powde actua ed anchors w1 1 %e a wed. d. Support suspended piping on Superstrut C-711, Bergen-Paterson Fig. 234, Fee and Mason Fig. 234, Fee and Mason Fig. 210, or approved equal hangers (electro-chromate finish); all with double nuts and rods (all electro-chromated) - rods sized as follows: (1) Pipe size, to and including 2-inch (nominal) - 3/8 inch ® 2-1/2 - 4 inch - 1/2 inch 6 inch - 3/4 inch (2) Hangers sized to fit over covering - no exceptions. (3) Where hanger supports are longer than 18 inches, provide lateral bracing at every fourth hanger. e. Place hangers for horizontal runs of cast iron pipe on five feet centers, with a separate hanger for each branch less than 5 feet; on maximum 8 feet centers for threaded or welded pipe; with a separate hanger for each branch 5 feet or longer; copper tubing as follows: 1/2 inch tubing (nominal) - 6 feet centers 3/4 and 1-inch - 8 feet centers 1-1/4 inch and larger - 10 feet centers f. Where two or more lines run parallel, Superstrut A-1200 channels, with No. 701 and/or 702 pipe clamps (and separators, where required), equiva- lent Bergen-Paterson Fig. 206 or dnistrut P-1001 hangers may be used - electro-chromated. g. Pipes near floor may be supported on pipe standards; each fitted with a base flange and adjustable top yoke; with a Mason Type "W" neoprene isolation pad between flange and sleeve. CCS 32 -54- Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel ® 9. Continued: h. Tie down vertical risers to make rigid with approved hooks, brackets, or clamps (copper on copper lines). Anchor copper tubing, to and including 1=1/4 inch, at maximum 6-feet intervals. i. Install at each support point on all covered piping (except chilled water piping), a 10-inch long No. 18 gauge galvanized sheet metal in- sulation protection saddle; of a diameter to fit snugly around pipe covering to quarter-points of circumference. 10. Piping: a. Thoroughly clean piping, and maintain in such condition throughout construction; temporarily capping or plugging unprotected ends of pipe and tubing when not being worked on. b. Cut pipe and tubing accurately to measurements established at the building, and work into place without springing or forcing - out of the way of building openings, duct work, electrical conduits and equipment. All pipe shall have rough edges or burrs removed so that a smooth and unobstructed flow is obtained. c. Run piping concealed wherever possible; with vertical lines plub and horizontal. e. Protect against condensation, with suitable sheet metal gutters or by other approved means, new water and drainage piping located over switch- boards or other electrical equipment. f. Make changes in pipe sizes with bell reducers. g. Make offsets with fittings - pipe or tubing shall not be bent or flattened h. Street elbows, bushings, close nipples, bullhead tees, crosses, or saddle hubs are not acceptable, except where specially called for on plans i. Isolate uninsulated water lines from hangers and clamps with Superstrut No. 715 or 716, Semco No. 100 or 500, or approved equal isolators; and from building structural members and concrete walls and slabs with 1/4 inch thick felt pads (maximum compression, felt - 20 per cent. j. Make up screw joints with teflon tape. applied only to male threads. 0 0 1 33 —55— :II1 cj Finance Bldg- Air Conditioning Remodel 10. Con.hued: ubing with "Streamline" No. 95-5 solder and If cnldPr joints in copper t "" `' dpN'uv,u .awe,, 1 _.. water and drainage piping located over switch- boards or other electrical equipment. f. Hake changes in pipe sizes with bell reducers. g. Make offsets with fittings - pipe or tubing shall not be bent or flattened h. Street elbows, bushings, close nipples, bullhead tees, crosses, or saddle hubs are not acceptable, except where specially called for on plans i. Isolate uninsulated water lines from hangers and clamps with Superstrut No. 715 or 716, Semco No. 100 or 500, or approved equal isolators; and . from building structural members and concrete walls and slabs with 1/4 inch thick felt pads (maximum compression, felt - 20 per cent. j• Make up screw joints with teflon tape. applied only to male threads. —55— 00133 ah Finance Bldg- Air Conditioning Remodel 10. Continued: k. Solder joints in copper tubing with "Streamline" No. 95-5 solder and No. 50 flux. 1. Make welding joints (except pipe welded end-to-end) with forged one- piece, long radius welding fittings; in conformance with "Standard . . Procedure Specifications" of the National Certified Pipe Welding Bureau. m. Hake exposed "polished" connections with special care -.no tool marks to show. n. Refrigerant Piping: Copper tubing, made up with silver-brased joints; accessories to include liquid line shutoff valve, filter-drier and sight glass - each refrigerant circuit provided with it's own expansion valve and liquid line solenoid. Charging valves where required. o. Condenser Water pipe shall be type M , hard drawn copper tubing. p. Makeup Water and Drain (Cooling) - Type 'tt", hard drawn copper tubing. q. Arrange heating water and chilled water piping at coil and equipment connections so that normal inspection and servicing of equipment (and • tube cleaning) is not impaired, and so that the piping creates no inter- ference with the removal of access panels, tube heads or-other equip- ment components. r. Install chilled water piping at coils as high as possible; each coil valve assembly perpendicular to coil face - all to clear air filters, access panels, etc. s. Run pipes full size, with reductions for automatic control valves made immediately before valves. t. Provide condensate pump with automatic float control, sump and dis charge line, connect to existing drain line, all as shown on the plans.. u. Modify lubrication points by providing necessary fittings and extending soldered copper tubing (or ips brass pipe) as required to permit lubri- cating all bearings on each unit from a single accessible location. -56- 0U134 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel 11. Piping and Equipment Identification: a. All piping installed under this Division shall be identified with names.- and flow direction arrows, using Brady Pipe Markers and "3-M" No. 471 tape; following coding established by the Engineer. Markers shall''be located for maximum visibility from expected personnel approach at maxi- mean 50 feet intervals; at least one within each room and at each access opening. b. Provide black laminated plastic nameplates, with 2 inch high white engraved lettering, and mount on each major piece of equipment -follow ing equipment designations noted on drawings. j 4 -57- 0013) Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel 12. Valves, Gauoes, Etc. a. Install valves in accessible locations; stems vertical with wheels- above, or with stems horizontal. b. Unless otherwise noted, all valves 2-1/2 inch and larger shall be flanged iron body, bronze mounted, with bronze stems; smaller sizes all brass or bronze, screwed. Solder valves are not acceptable. c. All gate, globe and check valves of each type shall be products of a single manufacturer - Jenkins Bros., or equivalent Crane, Stockham, or Walworth, as approved; with removeable seats and discs, and with bonnets designed for packing under pressure - discs as re- commended by the valve manufacturer for the intended service. Gate Valves - Up to and including 2 inch - Jenkin Brother Figure 47-U, rising stem, union bonnet; with Mueller No. 'WC-401 adapter (male pipe thread to copper), or equipvalent as approved, on copper lines. d. Install a well in the chilled water supply and return line at the condensers to accommodate temperature controller. e. Install each pressure gauge with ips brass pipe, with an approved a •:gagecock. f. Install an air vent valve, with gate valve, at each high point of water systems and where indicated; all in accessible locations. Ex- tend copper tubing from each air vent discharge to over nearest drain, oras directed - (1) Air Vent (each water coil) - 3/8 inch brass petcock)Walworth 1557. (2) Circuit Setters - Equal to ITT Bell and Gossett Type "CB" balance valve with integral check valves, calibrated nameplate and indi- cating pointer. 9- Globe Valves - Up to and including 2 inch - Figure 106-A; 2-1/2 inch and larger - Figure 613, outside screw and yoke; with adapters as "gates" on copper lines. h. Check Valves (unless otherwise noted) - Up to and including 2 inch - Figure 92-A, 15 degree swing with bronze disc; with adapters as "gates" on copper lines. 2-1/2 inch and 3 inch - equal to Williams-Hager No. 329; flanged and semi-steel body, bronze trim, center guided. 4 inch and larger - Williams-Hager No. 636; flanged semi-steel body, bronze trim, . globe-type body. 00130" -58- r Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel j.' All balancing valves shall be B & G circuit setters or approved equal. k. Pressure Reducint Valves and Relief Valves: As required; relief valves ASME Code-sized and labeled to exceed full capacity of respective system - each fitted with an externally operated test lever. 13. Piping Insulation (General): a. No new piping to be closed-in or covered until it has been inspected, tested, and approved. b. Carry pipe covering continuous, full size, through hangers. c. Inhere insulation butts against an equipment flange, or is terminated taper insulation to pipe so that jacket completely seals off end of insulation; and finish with lagging adhesive. Insulate all flanges separately, to permit their removal without damage to adjacent covering. d. On valves, extend covering up to bonnet, and seal with lagging adhesive. • e. Cover strainer on chilled water lines, with insulation cut, formed, and applied for ease of removal or replacement. f. The following to be left uncovered: (1) Condensing water supply and return pipe, fittings, and accessories. (2) Makeup water pipe, fittings, and accessories. (3) Drain lines - relief valves and cooling coil drip pans, strainer blowoffs. e _59- 00137 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel • 14. Unions and Gaskets: a. Install a union on each branch line, adjacent to each screwed valve, and on each line connecting to equipment. (1) On copper lines, equal to Mueller 125 ib. screw - No. C-107, up to and including 2-1/2 inch; No. F-904, 3 inch and larger. (2) Make connections between copper and ferrous lines with "Epco or approved equal dielectric unions; or with flange unions, gasketed. b. Gaskets (as required for assembly of flanged joints and unions): Compressed asbestos composition sheets, 1/16 inch thick. 15. Strainers a. Armstrong Machine Works' Y-type; or equivalent Baily or Trane; each strainer full line size, with cast iron body and removable monel screen, with .045 inch diameter perforations at control valves and humidifiers, 0.125 inch perforations at water pumps. Up to and in- cluding 2 inch-screwed; 2-1/2 inch and larger flanged. b. Install 3/4" hose bibb on each strainer. c. Chilled Water Supply and Return Piping: (1) Cover pipe installed within building with 1 inch thick fiberglass 25 ASJ. Apply insulation with longitudinal joints on horizontal runs at top and bottom of pipe. (3) Fittings are fabricated from mitered segments. Fiberglass Heavy Density pipe insulation covered with Zeston molding. 16. Immersion Thermometers a. Marsh Type X7000, Palmer Model 50-A or Weksler Model 45VP3-AA, 4-1/2 inch dial-type instrument in black steel case, with unbreakable glass; each thermometer with separatable 'socket, or approved equal. Standard Ranges 0° - 150°, chilled water 2g°- 120°, condensing water 0 - 240°, heating water b. Install where indicated on drawings; in accessible locations, slightly above eye level and so that insulation does not cause interference. Where necessary to mount more than one foot above eye level, tilt dials at an angle so as to be easily read from tha,�}4ep. -60- Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel I' . 17. Temperature Controls: a �' r r-1 16. Immersion Thermometers a. Marsh Type X7000, Palmer Model 50-A or Weksler Model 45VP3-AA, 4-1/2 inch dial-type instrument in black steel case, with unbreakable glass; each thermometer with separatable 'socket, or approved equal. Standard Ranges 0° - 150°, chilled water 2g°- 120°, condensing water 0 - 240°, heating water b. Install where indicated on drawings; in accessible locations, slightly iabove eye level and so that insulation does not cause interference. Where necessary to mount more than one foot above eye level, tilt dials at an angle so as to be easily read from ,t1Q . -60- �JJ(U Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel 17. Temperature Controls: a. General: (1) Pneumatic controls are to be Johnson, to match existing. Represent- atives of whom shall make the entire control installation, including wiring for temperature control and mechanical equipment interlock. (2) Pneumatic control lines shall be copper except inside of new panel. Control lines shall be marked inside of cabinet. (3) Control systems diagrams on Drawing shall be the basis for detailed layouts which the control manufacturer shall prepare and submit, through the Contractor under this Section, for the Architect/ Engineer's review; together with a complete description of temper- ature control system operation, wiring schematics and drawings of temperature control panels. (4) Locations of thermostats on Drawings are tentative. Choose the most suitable thermostat locations, subject to the Architect/ Engineer's approval, and relocate any control instrument (without extra cost to the owner) if subject to conditions non-typical of the intended service. Insulate from structure, cases of the ther- mostats installed on perimeter walls or columns. (5) At completion of the Work, provide. two copies of "as- built" prints of control diagrams (with color coding or numbering used in wiring the systems indicated on the drawings), and detailed (typewritten or printed) descriptions of the sequence of operation of the systems. Mount one copy under arcrylic as directed. b. Control Equipment: (1) Control Valves - Bronze; up to and including 2 inch - screwed, 2-1/2 inch and larger - flanged. Valve sizes computed with con- sideration for the respective loads and water temperatures; pres- sure drop through valves not to exceed 2.0 psi. (2) Coil valves - Packed-type, 3 way mixing, with characterized V- port throttling nut and renewable disc; pneumatic type. (3) Thermostats - Pneumatic type to match existing. (4) Waterflow Switches - As called for in plans. (5) Refrigerated Air Drier - Ingersol Rand Model 2 or approved equal. (6) Remove existing water cooled after cooler and install new refri- gerated aftercooler at control air compressor. All as shown on the plans. -61- 00139 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel 17. Continued: C. -Control Operation: (1) Refrigerating System Control - The chilled water and condenser electrically water pumps to be interlocked with chilled water pump and tower pump. (2) Automatic Temperature Controller - The system shall be pneumatic and electric pneumatic and shall be manufactured by Johnson Service Company to match existing. The system shall be installed and assembled by trained mechanics employed by the manufacturer and shall be complete with all necessary control instruments, other necessary accessories, and the air pressure piping for interconnection of all parts of the system. 18. Air Filters: a. Air Filters shall be Farr 30 - 30 disposible type or equal. b. Air handling systems shall not be operated unless filters are in place. Filters shall be replaced with new filters after all airhandler tests have been completed. 19. Demolition: As far as possible, no existing pipe runs shall be removed until new pipe runs have been installed and proven. • -62- 00140 Finance Bldg. Air-Conditioning Remodel DIVISION H. 10SECTION 2 - Technical Conditions - Electrical - 1. GENERAL CONDITIONS: The General Conditions and General Requirements ire part of this Section and the contract for this work and apply to this Section as fully as if repeated here. 2. SCOPE A. Work Included: Furnish all labor, materials, apparatus, tools, equipment, transportation, temporary construction and special or occasional services as required to make a complete working installation of all electrical systems shown on the drawings or described in these specifications. The work shall include all materials, appliances and apparatus not specifically mentioned herein or noted on the drawings as being furnished and installed under another section. The general extent of the electrical work is shown on the elec- trical drawings, mechanical, plumbing and architectural drawings, and in- cludes, but is not limited to the following: (1) Secondary service is 170/208 volts. (2) Panelboard. (3) Electrical feeders. (4) Ail branch circuit wiring, and wiring devices for receptacles, appliances and electrically powered equipment or apparatus, in- cluding wiring and connections to motors and motor controllers. (5) Connection and testing of electrical appliances. (6) Cutting, patching and caulking for all penetrations required for electrical work. (7) Conduit only for low voltage control wiring for heating-and- ventilating systems. (8) As-built drawings. (9) Removal and or reuse of existing electrical systems. B. Related Work in Other Sections: (7) Motors are furnished and installed uner Section 1, but circuits, to, connection of, and testing of all motors are included under this Section. (2) Motor starters -ill be provided by the County but shall be in- stalled under this section. -63- 04141 • ."nom{ � f Finance Bldg. Air-Conditioning Remodel 1 3. CODE REQUIREMENTS: A. All work shall be performed in accordance with all applicable require- ments of governing codes, rules and regulations, including the following: (1) National Electrical Code. (2) State of California, Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 3. (3) Rules and regulations of the local power company. (4) All pertinent city and county codes. 4. VISIT TO SITE: Visit the project site, take requisite measurements, and verify exact voca- tion of buildings, utilities, and other facilities, and obtain such other information as is necessary for an intelligent bid. No allowance will gib- sequently be made for any error or omission on the part of the bidder in this connection. 5. DRAWINGS: The electrical drawings, which constitute an integral part of this contract, shall serve as the working drawings. They indicate diagrammatically the general layout of the complete electrical system, including the arrangement of feeders, circuits, outlets, switches, controls, panelboards, service equip- ment, fixtures, special systems, and other work. Field verifications of scale dimensions taken from drawings are directed since actual field locations, distances and elevations will be governed by actual field conditions. Review architectural, structural, mechanical and plumbing drawings and adjust work to conform to all conditions indicated theron. Discrepancies shown on different plans, or between plans and actual field conditions, or between plans and specifications, shall promptly be brought to the attention of the Engineer for a decision. -64- 00142 Finance Bldg. • Air-Conditioning Remodel 11. SUBMITTALS AND SHOP DRAWINGS: See General Conditions. The complete electrical materials and shop drawings.- submittal shall be made at one time and shall be presented in a bound brochure. form with covers and index. Loose leaf submittals will not be accepted.. A. Submittals shall clearly indicate: (1) Tag, mark or number by which item is identified by contract documents. (2) Complete dimensional data and descriptive information. (3) Elevation views for complete representation. (4) Construction details and arrangement. (5) Location and sizes of connections. • si-art •30 ,toyt..mc-'ac-'o• _ 'y• . `.� i� v' F rt. 0014.3 -65- :r Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel Paralleled conduits shall be run straight and true with offsets uniform and symmetrical. Conduits shall be secured by means of straps or clamps where single runs occur or on racks and hangers for multiple runs. Conduit terminations at cabinets and boxes shall be rigidly secured with locknuts and insulated bushings. All conduit ends shall be reamed after cutting and, if not secured to boxes or cabinets, shall be capped and protected during construction. Electrical metallic tubing may be used in concealed locations above grade, but not in concrete walls or floors. Flexible conduit shall be used for connection of motors, heating and ventilating and plumbing equipment or locations where it is not practicable to use rigid conduit or electrical metallic tubing. In exterior locations or in wet or damp locations, the flexible conduit shall be "Seal Tite". Exposed conduit shall be run parallel to, or at right angles to, building lines and/or center lines of beams and columns. Exposed conduit work shall be neat, of good appearance and free from irregularities and damage. C: Installation of Wire and Cables No wire shall be pulled into any portion of the conduit system until all construction work that might damage the wire has been completed. All wiring shall be continuous from outlet to outlet, or from terminal to terminal. No splices will be permitted in conduits. Securely tag all branch circuits, noting the purpose of each. Mark wires with Brady "Quick-Label" wraparound wire markers. Where two or more conduits enter in a single outlet, mark each conductor with it's corres- ponding circuit number. D. Connection of Mechanical Equipment Install and connect all motor starters, connect all motors and test motors for proper rotation. Verify exact sizes, types and locations of all motors furnished under other sections and ascertain proper routing of electrical services through walls, floors or ceilings as the case may be. 00144 —68— Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel (3) Color code 08 and smaller throughout. For #6 and larger use Brady Ophase color tags at boxes and other terminal points. E. Wire and Cable Connectors (1) T & B one piece type RP12, self-insulated connector for #10 wire or smaller or MMM Co. Scotchloks. (2) For #8 and larger use T & B compression connectors series 54000. F. Conduit Supports and Hangers Kindorf, Unistrut, or approved equal 14. EXECUTION: A. General All wiring shall be installed in an accessible conduit system which shall be electrically continuous throughout. The conduit system shall be con- cealed unless exposed work is clearly called for on the drawings. Where field conditions require indicated conduits to be run exposed, approval of the Architect shall be secured prior to installation. The term "Conduit" as used in this specification referes to rigid conduit, electrical metallic tubing, . flexible conduit or watertight flexible conduit. Except as otherwise specified, preparation, handling, and installation of . products and materials furnished order this section shall be in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and technical data pertinent to the product specified and/or approved. B. Installation of Conduit Conduits shall be installed in a neat, workmanlike manner and installation shall conform to the best of modern practice. All conduits shall be in- stalled with code radius bends with not more than four bends per run. Where more than four bends are required in a particular run, pull boxes shall be installed to facilitate the pulling of conductors. -69- 0014i { �•.z ,.fat Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel E. Cutting and Patching Provide necessary cutting in connection with the electrical work and make repairs in a manner satisfactory to the County engineer. Structural members shall not be drilled, bored or notched in such a manner as to impair their structural value. Cutting of holes in concrete, if required, shall be by core.drill. Cutting shall be as indicated or only with written approval of the Architect. F. Identification of Equipment and Circuits Nameplates shall be provided to permanently identify all switchboards, circuit breakers, panelboards, motor starters, relays, time switches and other cabinet mounted equipment or apparatus. Nameplates shall be of a laminated phenolic type consisting of three layers, black-white- black, with the uppermost layer engraved to. show the white layer, not less than 3" X 3". All nameplates shall be installed with screws or pop rivets. G. Grounding Except as otherwise specified, the complete electrical installation, including the neutral conductor, metallic conduits and raceways, boxes, cabinets and equipment shall be permanently and effectively grounded in accordance with all code requirements, whether or not such connections are specifically shown or specified. Ground conductor shall be Type TW wire installed in rigid conduit and extended to a cold water line which is not less than 14" iron pipe from point of ground connection to earth. Attach to cold water pipe with T & B conduit hub and water pipe clamp. Ground resistance at any point shall not exceed 3 ohms. H. Tests Tests shall be conducted during the construction period to determine conformity with applicable codes and with these specifications. Tests shall be performed in the presence of the Architect or his representa- tive and shall include: (1) Perform megger tests on all feeders. The minimum acceptable insula- tion value for feeder conductors is one meg-ohm. (2) Test all motors for proper operation and rotation. (3) Test all Contractor furnished equipment for proper operation. (4) Test Owner furnished equipment for proper operation. (5) Prior to energizing the electrical system, the neutral circuit shall be checked for accidental grounds. Any accidental grounds shall be corrected. -7o- O0147 Y "WoolFinance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel I. Demolition and Salvage t nt of r �. ..� L.- L.,.,juUued during the construction period to determine conformity with applicable codes and with these specifications. Tests shall be performed in the presence of the Architect or his representa- tive and shall include: (1) Perform megger tests on all feeders. The minimum acceptable insula- tion value for feeder conductors is one meg-ohm. (2) Test all motors for proper operation and rotation. (3) Test all Contractor furnished equipment for proper operation. (4) Test Owner furnished equipment for proper operation. (5) Prior to energizing the electrical system, the neutral circuit shall be checked for accidental grounds. Any accidental grounds shall be corrected. -70- 00147 Finance Bldg. Air Conditioning Remodel I. Demolition and Salvage Refer to Electrical Drawings for approximate extent of removals. Re- County will take delivery of turn all salvaged materials to County. , all salvaged materials on site. All other removed materials shall be removed from site by Contractor. (1) Remove indicated existing electrical devices and fixtures. (2) Remove indicated existing wire and cable. (3) Remove indicated exposed conduit. G -71- 00141 r,r. f S all as p T! s0 C= L 'a b c � 's .2 m a o qr _ 213 =x. 0 22 r pp s c a ra r i• a � s ' m a . a . o" cr 3 Z o m D m L§ fzim a � s _ 0 o. - R } a o .p J e i F � ! t 61/ 09:� 09145 �� �,, _c t �_W _._.t_-••__i__ -___1_.__.Y-_...-_.._�_.._-•.�-••------.T-- ! __..__S=•*-i,�... iL:.�:L_-_..._ilk.<!tti-_.._-...�R�?�L�_.. It t '► i-3 _t - � • ii ' Gi' t t •�,t�<Syu:.nSr+S4 � i I t"�2� ?? +�F3C II f C J +"r{gr�aji� J� fF � «?�.��#6 ,o C,_�y.•e.� 'Ifs t pat fay M � � i xj . a t• _ .3 ., yrs �_�__ jr ty� :f�i — 'tom far.—_—_--__ f 4 Jl rl � '. F ;`- "�_'.- I�r+�•sem =:1-.,.�b !i : Y � � 4 t` 7+ itit } i .s �Sz �� rJ .� K /• It it if 1 it 4 `�� ki it .� � Sat'• a I ori }..: --�.,_�`� � �� ��' �,70 ��' �i ,�' �nM t!� � � •t• ;� [ .! '``-i w� y �s if ii L�(t'-,.,�.i-•••..t �{ ._t.. far tw I � t F \•�' tx i me X'I ii - S r 1° tt + 3� R P r rn �s s,^ t Ell D i !gd o fp 0 .c r� # -o s .a .I { t' �'iIIl f ��L zS PR iM S 11S :° • 1 r t I( J � os tat) 10 �» :< `i 'rGw ill t);i_ ;.'�a . � �ski -•4 �_` �' s$ _ , 3 ti .,1• i I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Amending ) Resolution No. 76/638 ) Establishing Rates to be Paid ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/858 to Child Care Institutions ) WHEREAS this Board on July 27, 1976, adopted Resolution No. 76/638 establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions for the fiscal year 1976-77; and WHEREAS the Board has been advised that certain institutions should be-added to the approved list; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that Resolution �No. 76/638 is hereby amended as detailed below: ADD THE FOLLOWING GROUP HOMES MONTHLY RATE Holeman, Inc. (aka Bay Area Boys Home,-Inc_), $979 San Mateo Work Training, Inc./Santa Barbara 829 PASSED and ADOPTED on September 28, 1976. Orig: Director, Human Resources Agency cc: Social Service, M. Hallgren County Probation Officer County Administrator County Auditor-Controller -RESOLUTION N0. 76/858 mh 00152 i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving ) the Federal-aid Secondary ) RESOLUTION NO. 76/8S9 Road System ) h'HEREAS improvements funded with Federal-aid Secondary Highway funds must be located on a Federal-aid Secondary Highway System; and MIEREAS the Federal-aid Secondary Highway System shall consist of routes classified as major collectors in the 1980 Functional Classification System and is to be a cooperative process with the County, State, and Federal Highway Administration; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does hereby approve the Federal-aid Secondary Highway System as consisting of those roads classified as major collectors in the 1980 Functional Classification Program, as graphically shown on Exhibit A and as designated in Exhibit B (these exhibits being attached hereto and hereby made a part of this resolution). i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors hereby requests that the roads designated in Exhibit C be included in the Federal-aid Secondary Highway System. Passed and adopted by the Board on September 28, 1976. t cc Public Norks Director (4 certified copies) Planning Department t RESOLUTION NO. 76/859 091 i t 3 ,3 S • rn ! s • k 40 Y � � Rco ' Ce 40 CO l • O c� d tq 41P 4 a p r e` Y ca co � +�• a •.,1;.'.:' A i:°:. A v .0 . ••• -� � Ltl h b a C a "'` � a•+ : '• ��• ` f _� �. w.ISn •r 1r . a • is 0 A• •• e t Cb , •I Y ? co r7l e • :. .w/a 0 •+• r - !� •••+• • •• ca • r-•�' � r`ri µkb,,-,* j •♦+•••/ • i ' • =ate � :- •� f 0'000:* • • f o e•• i 1 a. r�=: i 00.16, Jw�J fe•3 `4 I a 1 . O o f n n --�n <—<cswn N • i IG p O r~•.H p P'4 O p Or 1 C. n 4 p Oporn O G H O W m ON D npIIeN Oa m I \ � 1 � a C las o � i l I � ►-1 a a � a Z 1 i 1 1p 0--11 a-t rs£ �O A HtDH •CSK mn H p c r I a•o`t O ?C p o•p o• C o V3 p 0- IN H p N` �K p £ K W p• , 3 .'7 7N F"N O O i O O •1 ,C) N O N DQO a(' N r N O N'p N I K ego K o D� o rro p o l o n o !o oana`s � W .oaraAao 1 i �7c• n r p r 1(�H p oO r i i ! I ?► < 3 rt ctE=1 OHO 3 1 3� F•3 0 .� 't ct 11 �0- 1 � +ate°• i t D 1 ; , N N M I N ( N N ! N t) 1 I I 1 tl I P r'► A bo- �j K la '.,,! I ! I rn rn X n n n es KCap c� � o 0 o D X � ,o G • o K Z rn `cltC Am ` w AK `C r w w ql 1 ( I .£ 1' h►+ N a1 r H P. 14 a I K �ix o o g O i 1+ K o r•- —Z w 0 x fn �Tt C ( I I �C � D i , m OMC = I f z ' ! I I i i z Zi 0 o , ` �,,. ,r 1 I -+ x �1 m, 1 .�., �� � o w ►� [w Iw r. o to iv o oa r co r o 0 ;o in D mD (mM�� I ( C D D 7 C-3 n O N "_ 0 rt 3 r`7• 7 N ..� rt C ro o po m 93 91 m -t � a a cn a O r( CA Xan H r Q•0 :0 w `< a � O ' ►Ot Dana D ! ! I I t m t�9K 0H aH o � � .-� 1 w�Lw!•vwCw - O l7 O H 0 00 rO 0.�00.N 0. C w ?C to N N m Y= m Z t� I bel "C :30 C p C 1 Zrn D C" C �w w N r O KOC fid¢ p 0. � 0.1µ0.� w 0 rp O Ui w 0 r I + 3 .•a NUr t i I.-bw wp ( ' rt rt II (a N N ri �1 i 2 ! c Z _ n o Z 7 I CN 2� mmD . ___ 0015 -1 RESOLUTION NO. 7 /sCe� RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1973-3, SAN RAI-ION, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, by resolution adopted on the 7th day of September, 1976, it was directed that bids be called for the installation of reflective pavement markers in Assessment Dis- trict No. 1973-3, San Ramon, Contra Costa County, California, and that the time fixed for receiving sealed bids or proposals was the 28th day of September, 1976, at the hour of 11:00 o'clock A.M. of said day; and WHEREAS, Notice Inviting Sealed Bids was duly pub- lished in the time and manner required by law; and WHEREAS, all bids having been publicly opened, examined and declared pertaining to the doing of the work and improvements described in the plans and specifications, which plans and specifications are hereby expressly referred to for a description of said improvements, and for all other particu- lars relative to the proceedings under said Resolution of In- tention, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, on the 8th day of October, 1974, ordered the im- provements to be made in said assessment district; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Board 9,0-1- E p 1 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, on the 8th day of October, 1974, ordered the im- provements to be made in said assessment district; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Board AMA Py d, -1- l of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of Calif- ornia, hereby rejects all of said proposals or bids, except that herein mentioned, and hereby awards the contract for the construction of said work to the lowest responsible bidder, to wit: 3IU,Y r`T'. IPI';G :'?PVICF•: at the prices named in the bid of said bidder on file in the office of the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa; and IT IS HEREBY DIRECTED that the County Clerk of the County of Contra Costa publish a Notice of Award of Contract. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 28th day of September, 1976. ATTEST: JAMES R. O`LSSON, Clerk ::innie Poaz, Deputy lark ee- 7ond Counsel 1'n-1neer of Vora Public 'pork: '.'ireator County Ceuzzal ^aunty Aud for-,ontroller Coint ' Administrator "r. =eor,-e =orcon, .ttorney -2- 00158 AT T.W.ji.•t•1. /i.• r.:__� TO CL---'!',Y, I. .:tD OF at o'clock SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Record:, J. R. OLSSO::, County Recorder Fee S Official BOARD OF SUtERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COIJI Y, CALIFORIHIA AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE' COh'TRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT s In the Ilatter of Accepting and Giving RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTAKeE Notice of Completion of Contract with 3 and NONCE 0_ CO::PLET10.: Renfroe Meador,. Inc., dba Enterprise (C.C. 03036, 3093) Roofs Service Walnut Creek. � RESOLUTIOr: NO. 76/861 -(Mz5-zU75-1 11U-010) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on July 20, 1976 contracted with Renfroe Meador Inc dba Enterprise Roofing Service P.O. Box 4202, Walnut Creek Cal. 94596 Jiame and Address of Con Tactor) ^y for re-roofing Fire Station No. 11 at 5850 Clayton Road, Clayton, CA. , (h Budget Line Item No. 2025-2025-7710-610 all in accordance with \ the specs ications or General Con itions erepared by or fort e Publac norks Director and in accor ance with the accepted i proposal. .lith Fireman's Fund American San Francisco as surety, 17ame of Bonding Company for work to be performed on the grounds_ of the County; and The Publin t orks Director reports that said vorl: has been inspected . and complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and stand,--a specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of entember 20, 1976 Therefore, said work is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the County Recorder a cop; of this Resolution and Notice as a Notice of Completion for -said contract_ PASSED AilD r" 32-TED ONSQnromh r 28, 1976 CERTLIFIC!`.ION and 1BRZ=ICATION I certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolu- tion and acceptance duly adopted and ertcr ad on he _^_=:?L•tes of i-rds Board,s =cclu-ing on the above date. s declz•e z:.^der pen l ty o- perjury that the fore:Toing is true and correct. Mated: September 28, 1976 = J. R. C'T_.SSO::, Co n t;; C=e=_ c at ; artin=s, California 'ex officio Cie-.!-.k or the Eoa_d epu cy c:r_ cc: nocora anti r e LuI ii Cc)-.1tracfor Auditor Ad:Sri::t:r;ttol• r.ESOl.1t` 70,F 1:0. 76/861 00159 f 4 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: ) Pursuant to Section 22507 of the ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2252 - PRO CVC, declaring a No Parking Zone ) on M.TZ AVENUE (Ad. i4725AF) Date: _ SEP 2 6 1976 Danville Area a (Supe. Dist. V - Danville ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the- County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering 'Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2-012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated) : Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code parking is here—by declared to be prohibited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excepted, on the south side of Hartz Avenue 04725AF), Danville, beginning at a point hO feet ses't of the center line of Hartz Court and extending uester]y a distance of 100 feet. f Adopted by the Board on..H 2.�,1��� r i cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 00160 Now In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 197¢_ In the Matter of Acceptance of Quitclaim Deed for Clearance of Title Encumbrance North Richmond Bypass Project No. 0572-4345-663-72 Parcel 5 - Harvey. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the quitclaim deed from Herman E. Martin and Catherine A. Martin, his wife, dated September 20, 1976, which eliminates the title encumbrance of a 20 foot mutual Right of Way across County property, is hereby ACCEPTED. The Public Works Real Property Division is DIRECTED to have said quitclaim deed recorded in the office of the County Recorder. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors affixed this 23 day of Sentember 19 76 cc: Public Works Director County Recorder (via P/W) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz H-24 3/7615m , t In the Board of Supervisors of ; Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Instruments. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following instruments are ACCEPTED: INSTRUMENT DATE GRANTOR ' REFERENCE GRANT DEED 9-20-76 JAMES INVESTPIENT CO., RD. NO. S301 INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. GRANT DEED 7-21-76 D.C. DEVELOPMENT F CONST. MS 46-76 CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. CONSENT TO DEEDING 7-29-76 GLENN L. ALLEN, ET AL. MS 46-76 RELINQUISHMENT OF 7-21-76 D.C. DEVELOPMEM f, CONST. MS 46-76 ABUTTER'S RIGHTS CO., INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. CONSENT TO OFFER OF 8-4-76 JAMES A. BACA MS 67-74 DEDICATION GRANT DEED 8-3-76 RUDOLPH GESTRI, ET AL. MS 67-74 CONSENT TO DEDICATION 8-3-76 PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND FIS 11-76 TELEGRAPH CO., A CALIFORNIA CORP. GRANT DEED 6-23-76 GWENDOLYN M. RICHART SUB. 4701 RELINQUISHMENT OF 6-23-76 GWENDOLYN M. RICHART SUB. 4701 ABUTTER'S RIGHTS RELINQUISMIENT OF 6-23-76 GWENDOLYN M. RICHART SUB. 4701 ABUTTER'S RIGHTS (SECOND DOMIEAT) CONSENT TO DEDICATION 8-30-76 PACIFIC GAS $ ELECTRIC HS 65-76 CO., A CALIFORNIA CORP. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept.: PN-LD Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors CC: Recorder (iiia P.li.) affixed this 23 day of_September . 1976 Public Works Director Director of Planning . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Oeputy Clerk Bonnie boaz 4 H-24 3/76 15m 001 d� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Acceptance of Instruments for Recording only. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following Offers of Dedication are accepted for RECORDING ONLY: INSTRUA[ENT DATE GRANTOR REFERENCE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 5-25-76 RONALD DIORRISON FORD, B4164-76 ROADWAY PURPOSES EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ANNIE bf. FORD OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 7-1-76 IIEPDMN J. TIJSSELING, DfS 37-76 ROADWAY PURPOSES INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 7-1-76 HERMAN J. TIJSSELING, bfS 37-76 DRAINAGE PURPOSES INC., A CALIFORNIA CORP. OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 8-26-76 ROBERT BOSWELL, ET AL. DIS 25-7S ROADWAY PURPOSES OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 6-25-76 ROBERT BOSWELL, ET AL. DIS 25-75 ROAD PURPOSES (2nd DOCMtENT) OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 6-25-76 ROBERT BOSWELL, ET AL. EIS 25-75 DRAINAGE PURPOSES OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 7-16-76 UNION SAFE DEPOSIT BANK DIS 33-76 ROADWAY PURPOSES OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 7-19-76 STANLEY E. PEREIRA, MS 65-76 ROADWAY PURPOSES EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF AIANUEL E. PEREIRA, JR. OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 7-16-76 UNION SAFE DEPOSIT BANK DIS 65-76 ROADWAY PURPOSES OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 8-26-76 ALVIN URRICELQUI, ET AL. DIS 34-75 ROADWAY PURPOSES 0 OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR 6-25-76 ALVIN URRICELQUI, ET AL. - DIS 34-75 ROAD 1 � SE y t e Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig. Dept.: PW-LD Supervisors affixed this 28 day of,Sentember . 1976 CC: Recorder (via P.W.) Public Works Director R, OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning By 7 Deputy Clerk Bnnnie Boaz H-243)7GISm C-Ol Co3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 76 ' 19 In the Matter of Proposed Abandonment of the San Ramon Railroad Branch Line The County having received from the Southern Pacific Transportation Company copy of a notice filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission requesting the authority to abandon the San Ramon railroad branch line from a point near Concord Avenue to near Dougherty Road, in Alameda County; and The Public Works Director, in cooperation with the Planning Department and County Counsel, having reported that because of time requirements and lack of detailed information, it is impossible to evaluate the total effects of the proposed abandonment and formulate informed conditions of abandonment; and The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a position that includes the following: a) request standing in the petition for abandonment to ensure full involvement in the process. b) oppose the proposed abandonment and request that public hearings be held locally to provide for full disclosure of all facts so that abandonment conditions can be formulated. It is BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of the Public Works Director be approved; and It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Public Works Director, with the assistance of County Counsel, be authorized to file a protest on behalf of the County with the Interstate Commerce Commission. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig. Dept.; Public Works Dept., Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Transportation Planning Supervisors affixed this 28thi of September . 1976 May Public Works Director Planning Dept. J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel By • /��� . Deputy cleric N.POU$ H-24 3/76 15m 1 " k f CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 28, 1976 A G E N D A REPORTS Report B. PROPOSED _k3AN`DOiCV4=-NT OF THE SOUTHEPUN PACIFIC RAILROAD SAN RAMON BRANCH LINE - The Southern. Paci In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Granting Extension of Time in which to File the Final Map for Subdivision 43307, Byron Area On the recommendation of the Director of Planning, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Eugene F. DeBolt for a one-year extension of time in which to file the Final Map for Subdivision 4307, Byron area, is GRANTED, thereby extending the final filing date to September 30, 1977. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. i I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Orig.: Planning Department affixed this28thday of September 19 76 cc: Eugene F. DeBolt , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director of Planning Public Forks Director gy Deputy Clerk pF ine M. Ne d oo1s"D H-24 3/7615m I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.. State of California September 28 , 19 Z§ In the Matter of Releasing Deposit for Subdivision 4220, Walnut Creek Area. On December 17, 1974 this Board RESOLVED that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been maintained for one year after completion and acceptance against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Subdivision Agreement, it is by the Board ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Envar-Lafayette Company the $500 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail Number 102459 dated September 27, 1972. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Department: Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Supervisors Land Development Division affixed this 28thday of September . 1976 cc: Public Works Director-LD EJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk nvar-Lafayette Co. 1060 North Fourth Street By a,i Deputy Gerk San Jose, Calif. 95112 J n L Millef- 00167 H-24 3/76 Ism In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Refunding Cash Deposits for Subdivision MS 154-71, Brentwood Area. The Public Works Director has reported that on February 3, 1976 a reversion to acreage map was recorded on the above named development thereby relieving the owner of any responsibility for constructing improvements. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Raymond Vail and Associates the $500.00 cash bond posted as surety under the subdivision agreement and the $900.00 cash paid as inspection fee, both as evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 110862 dated September 5, 1973. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Supervisors Orig. Dept. : PW-LD affixed this28thday of September , 19 ?6 cc: Public Works-LD Raymond Vail & Assoc. J. R OLSSON, Clerk 101 Railroad Ave. By p." Clerk Antioch, CA 94509 Jean L. Mi e^ 00168 H-24 3/76 Ism IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA September 28, 1976 In the Matter of Releasing ) Deposit for Subdivision 4561, ) Alamo Area. On September 10, 1975 this Board resolved that the improvements in the above-named Subdivision were completed for the purpose.of establishing a beginning date for filing liens in case of action under the Subdivision Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been maintained for one year after completion and acceptance against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Subdivision Agreement, and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Subdivision Agreement, it is by the Board ORDERED that the Public Works Director':;:'. is authorized to refund to Bolla Development the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail Number 119698 dated August 28, 1974. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an Order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on -the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September , 1976 J.R. OLSSON, CLERK By. Depty Clerk Jean L. Miller Orig. Dept.: PW-LD CC,. Public Works Director-LD Public Works-B6S Bolla Develooment 31S8 Miranda Avenue Alamo, CA 94507 00169 P In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Refund of Cash Deposit, Subdivision 3918, Town of bforaga. The Board on June 26, 1972 having approved an agreement with Singer Housing Company for the installation and completion of public improvements in Subdivision 3918, bforaga area; and The Public Works Director having reported that the Town of Ioraga on September 1, 1976 declared that said improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for one year and authorized the County to refund the cash deposited as surety and for correction of deficiencies. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund to Singer Housing Company, the $500 cash deposited to insure completion of improvements, as evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 100024 dated June 14, 1972 and the $350 cash bond to insure correction of deficiencies as evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 121165 dated October 31, 1974. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supero cors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originating Department: Supervisors Public Works affixed this28th day of September 1976 Land Development Division _ cc: Town of bforaga J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Public Works Director-LD By �fj��fo�J , Deputy Clerk Singer Housing Company - 2777 Alvarado Street Jean L M ller San Leandro, Calif 94577 OU1'70 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 X19 76 In the Matter of Approval of Surety Tax Bond(s). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the surety tax bond(s) in the amount(s) indicated for the following tract(s) is(are) APPROVED: Tract Bond No. Location Principal No. Amount 4674 Concord Larwin — Northern 554 4766 $15,000 California, Inc. 4840 Moraga Ambers Company, 400 ER 6123 $15,000 Inc. and Miramar Company, Ltd. 4668 Antioch The Hofmann SC 6304957 $12,000 Company 4834 Concord Cornella U80 64 51 $ 1,700 Construction Co., Inc. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Tax Collector Supervisors with copy of bond(s) affixed this28th day of September, 1976 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y / ;�/� Deputy Clerk Maxine 1.1. N&Jeeld 31 00171 BOND NO. 554 4766 PMMUM 0150.00 SUBDIVISION TAX BOND F '. E KNOW AIL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: - SEP-2.p, 1576 That we, LARWIN - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. t 2 OLSWN (Principal) aux AAQ RS d/b/aa m. , .as Principal and th E=J CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY a corporation (Surety) created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of ILLINOIS. as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the COUNTY OF Contra Costa State of California, and the penal sum of. Fifteen Thousand and 00/100 - - - - -($15,000.00 ) DOLLARS, lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, WHEREAS, the said LARWIN - NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. owners (Principal) of a tract of land representing a certain subdivision of real estate, to wit: Tract 4674 , intend to file a (Subdivision) map thereof with the County Recorder of Contra Costa County. AND WHEREAS, the Provisions of the State Law require that this bond be filed with the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall pay, or cause to be paid, all taxes, and all special assessments collected like taxes, for the r ' fiscal year 1976 which at the time of filing said map are a lien against such subdivision, or any part thereof, but not yet payable, then this obligation shall cease and be void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and said Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals this 10th ZX�-Nl �UERU er, 1976 LIFORN INC. rinc Bv: rick M. Stevinson, President William F. Harrington, As 't Secretary CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY (Sure ) Bv: R. M. AJER, Attorney-in-Fact TO w9 G t$-r4 iTrmE INSURANCE (Corporation) J AND TRUST STATE OF CAT IF( 'VIA .A. it..te u1 L.tte state Law require that this bond be filed with the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall pay, or cause to be paid, all tares, and all special assessments collected like taxes, for the t ' fiscal year 1976 which at the time of filing said map are a lien against such subdivision, or any part thereof, but not yet payable, then this obligation shall cease and be void, otherwise it shall retrain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal and said Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals this 10th day ptember. 1976 _ LARW&Nk/UERN CALIFORNINC. rt.nc Bv: rick M. Stavinson, Pretsident 1 William F. Harrington, As tt Secretary CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY_; (Sure#) s Bv: l R. M. AJER, Attorney-in-Fact - M 449 CA M-r4 •! TM INSURANCE (CaryoratiosO J AN07RUST SATE OF CALIFOILNU COUNTY OF Alameda on se-ptMiler.l0_ 1976 before me.the uudersivxIL a Notary Public in and for said Stun pa-nigily appeared Roderick li. Stevenson r known to we to be the President.and fJi133am F. &lrrington a:r known to me to be Ass r t Hwy of the corporation that executed the within Imuument. y.* known to me to be'the petsans who executed the within .aInstrument on behalf of the corporation therein named. and i acknowledged to me that such corpotauoa executed the within iLatnuuuut«turttwutsrttnamsnumu:sta>: P. instrument to its by-laws or a resolution of its bondof = CEC{L!A L $ERAflNO NOTARY MSM—CALWOMA= 1 WITNESS my hand and official seal. = ., ' P ZrXWM-OFFrZE V4 / , s SANLT1 CRA COUNTY Signature_Js+i±/, f 1 4A-L4;W = Ary Ceocistion b;tiros Atay 7.1979 Csstt:setttutut:rurnttttc:tcsnntt:ass «s:s:t;7 i 4 Cecilia L. Serafino Name (Typed or Printed) m w slrW agwW wan 1.23208-A STATE OFCALIFORNIA 1 ` COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES JT t �[�ILYIf Yy HUiiD Notary Public of Los Angeles County,in the State of California do hereby certify that R. M. Ajer Attorney-in-fact, of the Continental Casualty Company,who Is person- ally known to me to be the same person whose name Is subscribed to the foregoing instrument,appeared before me this day in person,and acknowledged that he signed, sealed and delivered said instrument, for and on behalf of the OFFICL,:7. SE_�l, IContinental Casualty Company,for the uses and purposes therein set forth. MAi.:l,YN M. BURRLos Angeles Given under my hand and notarial seal at my office in the City of 8 in said County,this loth dyyof Septem er A.D.1976 LCS A%ZZ�_e ar...y —yj_h c�ti�v-.acY.-ta+�— ."cl•es r.LAy� 1 19801e' +,/• C YLTT.� yam. �� Notary Public. Mia tifitmed with Eioard order 00172 'a CONTINENTAL CASUf1LTy C Chicago, Illinois AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY-IN-FACT Know AU Men by these Presents.That CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State if III h x$n n c. sl office in the City of Chicago,and State of Illinois, does hereby make,constitute and appoint ' "' 1' � t°.T of I= ANGZIM, CI 17ORNU its true and lawful Attorney-+n-Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign,seal and execute in its behalf bonds, under takings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature as follows: WIMUr LIMMTIONS and to bind CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by the duly authorized officers of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and all the ads of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. "Article IX--Execution of Documents Section 3. Appointment of Attorney-in-fact. The President or a Ylce President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attomeys-in-fad to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature.Such attorn In-fad subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority shall have full power to bind the ComparryeyD�y thar signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto.The President or any Vice President or the Board of Directors may at arty time revoke all power and authority previously given to any attorney-in-facL" This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held an the 3rd day of April. 1957. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or a Vice President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 3 of Article IX of the By-Laws, and the signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any such power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached,continue to be valid and binding on the Company." In 1Yltness Mmeraot CONTINENTAL CASU COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vice President and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed to this _'h day of December 1974 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY MPANY State of Illinois l � r�.�,� County of Cook{ /�� A President. stAt "7 On this 51:11 day of December 1974 before me personally came R. J. Wa11 to me known,who, being by me duly Sworn, did depose and say:that he resides in the Village Of Wasters Springs, State of Illinois; that he is a Vice-President of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument: that he knows the seal of said Corporation;that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so affixed pursuant to the said instrument is such corporate seal;that it was so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Board of Directors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporation. • MIL Y� r7xaxr s r t� �� roeuc It - x p�,�t °`4si`�'v CERTIFICATE � Comias Expires Jtme ING"a7 73� I Patrick F. GranahaII ,Assistant Secretary of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,do hereby certify that the Power of Attorney herein above set forth is still in force. and further certify that Section 3 of Article IX of the By-Laws of the Company and the Resolution of the Board of Directors,set forth in said Power of Attorney are still in tone.In testimony whereof I ha}re hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the said Company this 10th day of September 19 /b M ICroti►med with board order 00173 r I SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE Fee . No. Subdivision: 4674 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a California corporation GUARANTEES The County of Contra Costa and any City within which said subdivision is located in a sum not exceeding $1,000.00. . That, according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters affecting the title to the land included within the exterior boundary shown on the map of the above referenced sub- division, the only parties having any record title interest in said land whose signatures are necessary, under the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, on the certificates consenting to-the recordation of said map and offering for dedication any streets. roads, avenues and other casements offer ed for dedication by slid map are: LARWIN-NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC_,' a California corporation TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, as TRUSTEE The map hereinbefore referred to is a subdivision of: PORTION OF Lots 30 and 31, Map- of the Undivided Lands in the Estate of Francisco Galindo, filed October 10, -1905, Map Book D, page 73, Contra Costa County records; and Parcel A according to Subdivision 3943 TRANSAh1EI1ICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPAN Y BY: S.'f Secretary Microfilmed with board order 00174 r „r THE ST.PAUL COMPANIES �>e+til ST.PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY 4140 ER 67,73 Bond 4 Premi 5 L61�' Bolam AGAIEST TAXES SEP--2P 1976 arRu BOARD OF SUPERVISORS KNOW ALL MEN BY TRESFi PRESC"NITS: A CO. THAT, A)EE S COi}PANY, INC. AND MIRAMAR COMPANY, LTD., as Principal and ST. PAUL FIRS AND MARINE IIVSUIRANCE COMPANY, as Surety, are held and firmly bound =to the COurrl'Y OF COrtTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFOR9IA, in -- the penal sum of FlIFFEEEN THOUSAND AND NO/100ths DOLLARS ($15,000.00), to be paid to the said County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The conditions of the above obligation are such that WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal is about to file a Map entitled THE MIRAMAR TRACT NO. 48410 covering a subdivision of a tract of land in said County of Contra Costa, and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, against the said Tract of land covered by said Mp, which taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, are not as yet due or payable, Now, therefore, if the said Principal shall pay all of the taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are now a lien against said tract of land covered by said Map at the time of the filing of said Map of said Tract, then this obligation shall be void and of no effect. Otherwise, it shall retain in full force and effect. SEATED with our seals and dated '=a 3rd day of September, 1976- .•-�(l b- �c ioET1r ` MIRAhr r�ANY LTD. ``,. : • by GF rx.4i- �st�cr�rYL/�Eo�sF/lo V. wsQs7s ST. PAULFPIE/ jAt1DARM ItLSURANCE COMPANY by f aohn X. Davis, Attorney in Fact STATE OF CAUFORNM roU Contra Costa oln_�ep_tember 3 1976 before me.the undersigned,a Notary Public In and for a.d state personally appea,.d Leonard Y. Ambers e s r known to rue to I. one of ,tp..of the pa...s p S that exeaRed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that c wick partnership executed the sane. �ntutr:TtgJttrinettTltlin:ltlSttu:tttttriuluuL/�•. ii� OFFICIAL SEAL ! WITNESS try hard and offidal zeal '>r. - C!inYjTltili ► Y = T ROT.AI ►G Li a:IC CxCaau GTARCOONTY U COMRA COSTA {{ � — � tN tSn"eraxice Gyt.a/aerary 1.3Ma S 7 F �/� Art.:Issattttznozllzrntntszr»zturturorzruzzzaz0 Signature Chrystina May. Name(Typed or Printed) _ _ Rhin aur for as"notarial"an. STATE OF CALIFORNIA t COUNTY of Contra Costa E OltSpptfmhpr 3, 1 976before me.The undersigned.a NotaryPu6Gc in and for maid State,personally n,geared Leonard Y. &be s t: known to me to be The the Pm id t., zxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxzxz corporation that executed the within imtrt/rrerrt : and known To rune to be The persons who executed the within a {Cf{ 'rrntrvtnent on behalf of-the corporation there.n named, and ac 1 cknowkdged to ate that suds corporation executed the within a imtrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of CL bdjrectom „tUllstttttitttllltztallaszlt/tTtaltlltllt/N1tr,tasfzzt� OFFICIAL SEAL, 7 _ CHRYSTINA MAY WITNESS my hand and o6da1 swL N=A" PWBUC ulttoawut Co111eTT Of COttT COSTA !�'.. ttr d+awrw Glare Signature - -curt.Y:'.rerfztzrtt2tturtittttlWltWlttttMlzl• Chrystina May Name(Typed or 1',et*4 M1 rata for offs"noww)saall R _ r• .. stwzF of cwtTrauw�sA I ACKNOWLEDGMENT BY SURETY COIIIiI7CF Qtr ER-d(o:ltin of C,n F..:, �tisb = s 3 dxlr� Septi bet 1976 - a before A meAr7 PebLallf;f@!a rrtth T�e is And for the State of C • 2o% OBi;a!s the Cooney O( r" a-,• .� h!C+r V— � duly ��wo Zu to?* and avaes41030*2 pea MUM.anoraftAa Pe�sl Jona W. Davis 10 me em`=h bad .Zi.�xamesr.rAPAMFIItE wATJ ar a Mlaatzota ?a Wham � Cf�AlfY and ar.Imolrkdgad Mheer� i bar"beteuzata -Y bled Aad-M—d tltL Car"CAU fhu above'Aute. r nn rmayW at a toy°�Trt-!a t1,a AfasaAld Com, lye day mad yea to Notary Public O�1 Tt ttlrl.rrlt1111riT 11[ltltl ltrrt l....... r.......au...y 5 Miaofilmeci with board order t A= FIREINIAN'S "" ""°'"'"•'wCCO""" Bond No SC 6344957 Twt•wc•K.w +su•..cc c°..••w• FUNDM-now. s .t..Co•ro..ra.. .acoCi.eco wocrwr.Co.ro•.no. AMERICAN •ru.c.w.uso..o.0 wsw.wccca...•w• INSURANCE CO](PANIES MO"t°FFICC S• FR—CISCO.C•ll10owu FILED BOND AGAINST TAXES S EPs; 1976 J. L OLSSW MVISOM KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: a�c�� n THAT WE THE H0FM.4NN COMPANY AS PRINCIPAL AND THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY AS SURETY ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA , IN THE PENAL SUM OF TWELVE THDUSAND DOLLARS AND NO/200 * * * * * * * * * * = * * * * *($12,000.00 TO BE PAID TO THE SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA FOR THE PAYMENT OF WHICH WEfANDEACH OF US BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, AND SUCCESSORS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. SEALED WITH OUR SEALS AND DATED THIS 14th DAY OF SEPTEMBER THIS BOND SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1976 THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION ARE SUCH THAT WHEREAS, THE ABOVE BOUNDED PRINCIPAL IS ABOUT TO FILE A MAP ENTITLED TRACT 4668. UNIT #1. SUNNYRIDGE. ANTTOCH. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND COVERING A SUBDIVISION OF A TRACT OF LAND IN SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA , AND THERE ARE CERTAIN LIENS FOR TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, AGAINST THE SAID TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY SAID MAP, WHICH TAXES AND SPECIAL f ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, ARE NOT AS YET DUE OR PAYABLE. NOW, THEREFORE, IF THE SAID THE HOFMANN COMPANY SHALL PAY ALL OF THE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES WHICH ARE A LIEN A3AINST SAID TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY SAID MAP AT THE TIME OF THE FILING OF SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BE VOID I AND OF NO EFFECT. OTHERWISE IT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. THE HDFMANN COMPANY Bv: THE AYRICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety `3x0045-12-b6 By: Jades C. Jenkins / Attorney—in—fact r 14th •y o f September .inthe learpne Appsand nine rIin THE CONDITaON Ut Tki- A-uv— U LL ABOVE BOUNDED PRINCIPAL IS ABOUT TO FILE A MAP ENTITLED TRACT 4668, ITIIT 41, SUNNYRIDGE. ANTTOCH. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY. CALIFORNIA AND COVERING A SUBDIVISION OF A TRACT OF LAND IN SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA , AND THERE ARE CERTAIN LIENS FOR TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, AGAINST THE SAID TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY SAID MAP, WHICH TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, ARE NOT AS YET DUE OR PAYABLE. NOW, THEREFORE, IF THE SAID THE HOFMANN COMPANY SHALL PAY ALL OF THE TAXES AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES WHICH ARE A LIEN AsAINST SAID TRACT OF LAND COVERED BY SAID MAP AT THE TIME OF THE FILING OF SAID MAP OF SAID TRACT, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BE VOID AND OF NO EFFECT. OTHERWISE IT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT. THE HOFMANN COMPANY Bv: THE RICAN INSURANCE COMPANY Surety ►3.0045-12-66 Jades C. Jenkins Attorney—in—fact STATE OFCALIFORNIAOn this 14th _day of Sep"ber theAe rte�i)pywnd Hint }� huredredard_ 76 _ .,beforemt, Patricia H 6rITTin COfAVT'f'OF_CIIALrd LOstd_ a Notary PubLiq State of CaGjornia,duly commiuiontd and sworn,yersonaRy appeared HQf.@apA._ _ known to me to be the_ Pre e'dent• ___ of the corporation described in and that executed the within Indrument,and also known to me to be the person._... who executed the within instrument on behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same _ IN 977NM WHEREOF t have hereunto set m hand and afficed my of(tcial y�timtitiz.;=�zszSSSSt aid Con ra Costa O;;•IZAi.S'.:L seat to the ..az County of --- _. _ _ the day and FAIRICIA A G,21r'F�1 year thisartiricalc fust _ CONTRA COsix CO:u+lY Notary Rblu,State bJCaufornia rr cva—=L41;=sty s,un ti4's�L1ti"1'Lti's'S l'�t�tiV Y ti`1111 L`V Cowday s Form No.28-Acknooiodtmeat Corporation(CC Sea 1190-1190.1) Printed 5172 STATE OF_ California Contra Costa COUNTY OF JJJ Oa this,' 14th day of_ September in they=19 before me, Ma_rttZa E- Mo11 a xoTA&T rLn=in and for said County and State,personally appeared — James C. Jenkins known to me to be the pawn wbose name is subscribed to the within insuument as sire Aturraey-in-fact of the F2M(A�N-S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY,and acknowl- edged to we that be subumbed the name of the FIREMAN S FUND INSURANCE COM- PANY tberezo as principal,and his own name as Attorney-in-fact IN TITNTM V EAEOF,I bave bercuato set any band and aged ray official seal,at my _ officS in said County and State..the day and year in this Serdfiate fins above written. - - - f;;:••: r•_: •_-.e q:._::, •Sotarr retie is.as for satd Qonab and Beau 0176 t % C;At__m )61ycommissionexpires.�Fril 6, 1978 '•.,c ,_- c -. ,_-,� y --� ,[ Microfilmed with board order BOND AGAINST TAXES Bond No. U80 64 51 Premium: $20.00 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT CORNULA CONSTRUCTION Co., INC. , as principal and (Surety) UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of WASHINGTON and authorized to transact surety business in California as surety are held and firmly bound unto the County of Contra Costa, State of California, in the penal sum of ONE THOUSMD SEVEN HUNDRED AND NO/300---Dollars $1,700.00 ), to be paid to the said County of Contra Costa, for the payment of which well and truly to be made, we and each of us bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators and successors, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Sealed with our seals and dated this 14th day of SEPTEMBER , 19 76 The conditions of the above obligation is such that WHEREAS, the above bounded principal is about to file a map entitled TRACT 4834 and covering a subdivision of a tract of land in said County of Contra Costa, and there are certain liens for taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, against the said Tract of land covered by said map, which taxes and special assessments collected as taxes, are not as yet due or payable. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said PRINCIPAL shall pay all of the taxes and special assessments collected as taxes which are a lien against said tract of.land covered by said mapat he., time of the filing of said map of said Tract, then this obligatior.jshall:'f be void and of no effect. Otherwise it shall -remain in full force' eri'd., effect. CORNELLA CONSTRU QN Co., INC. L E D ' y *ITED Prir}c alSEp� 1976 -c.�FIC NSURANCE COMPANY' 1- R.O'.SS N _ Sur ty �Ic 56ARD OF SypMt50Q5 e , Vi Teale, Attorney in fact ACM0WLEE DGEIN NT (By SURETY) ,State of California ) County of Contra costa ) County in which acknowledgement is taken On September 14 1976 , before me, Nancy L. Clowes , a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Vi Teale known to me to be attorney is fact of the corporation that executed the within instrument and also known So me to be the- person who executed it. on behalf of such corporation and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the w�thin instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its board of dire tors. �� ' c��lrlat.SEAL. � NANCY L COWES OU 1 fin additiop/ to signature type or +� NOTARY PUSUC-CAUFORNIA rr;n.;;W Mm ComrsCab�r print name of notary MY comm'ss:„Eapires wrr 19.1?so NOTARY PUBLIC _ _ __-. Miaofilmed with boord order w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 4. In the Matter of Extension of E1 Cerro Boulevard, Danville Area a On August 31, 1976, the Board of Supervisors referred an August 18, 1976 communication from the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, concerning frontage improvements with respect to the extension of E1 Cerro Boulevard through Church property, to the Public Works Director for report; and The Public Works Director having reported that considerable prelimi- nary engineering for the construction of E1 Cerro Boulevard between Danville Highway and La Gonda Way was done in 1971 and 1972, and at that time a proposal was sent to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, offering to do all paving and frontage improvements at no cost to the Church in exchange for the dedication of the necessary right of way, all of which was Church property and amounted to about 1.3 acres; and That the Church responded in agreement with the proposal but the exchange was never made due to a lack of County funding for the project; and That in 1976, the Church requested a land use permit and the Public Works Department recommended conditions which included dedication of the right-of-way and a deferred agreement for curb and sidewalks, with paving to be done by the County in recognition of the greater than normal amount of land. to be dedicated; and The Public Works Director having advised that the 1976 requirements were in accordance with Board policy on frontage improvements, but that due to the County's proposal and the Church's acceptance in 1972, the 1976 require- ments should be revised to conform to the 1972 proposal; and That the Departmental recommendations for Land Use Permit 2148-76 would be in conformance with the 1972 proposal as requested by the Church. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the report of the Public Works Director is accepted and the Clerk of the Board is directed to send copies of this Order to the Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland, 2900 Lakeshore Avenue, Oakland, CA 94610 and Mr. James E. Crossen, 1200 Contra Costa Boulevard, Concord, CA 94520. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Roman Catholic Bishop Supervisor of Oakland affixed this 28th day of September 19 76 Mr. James E. Crossen Public Works Director County Administrator -�" J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By {�/. /tau-o , Deputy Clerk N. Pous 0010'78 H-N ij7615m 1 1 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Rescision of Resolution No. 76/442 Summarily Abandoning Portions of North Gate Road, County Road No. 4461, Walnut Creek Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Resolution No. 76/442 is hereby RESCINDED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. Note: Public Works advises that Res. 76/442 was not recorded, therefore it is unnecessary to record this order rescinding 76/442. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: Recorder (via R/P); Public Works (2) affixed this 28thiay of September 1976 Assessor; Planning Department Pacific Gas and Electric Pacific Telephone �e d. R. OtSSOON,, Clerk East Bay Municipal Utility District By Oma► , De Clerk Thomas Brothers Maps N.PQt1S Contra Costa County Water District Stege Sanitary District Oakley County Water District 00179 San Pablo Sanitary District H-24 3/76 1m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28, , 19�6 In the Matter of Bids for the Countywide Pavement Marker and Rumble Strip Project-1976, Various Areas. (Project No. 4180-661-76) This being the time to receive bids for the Pavement Marker and Rumble Strip Project - 1976, various areas; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk: Riley's Striping Service, Concord Rayalco Inc., Angwin IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to the Public Works Director for review and recommendation. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Road Design Division affixed this 28ti11oy of September 1976 CC: Public Works Director County Audi tor-Control lerp J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By I. / 4' . Deputy Clerk N. Pous 00180 H•24 3176 15m IN P?.:; BCARD OF SUPHRVISORS �F CONT-hA COSTA COTI"Y, STAT3 OF CALVORNIA In the Matter of Approving ) Site Location and Sed ) Capacity Range for the ) September 23, 1976 County Jail. ) ) The Board of Supervisors having heretofore received the recommendations of the Detention Facility Advisory Committee on Jail capacity (338 beds) and location (Martinez Civic Center); and This being the time for the Board to receive a status report by Mr. V. L. Cline, Public forks Director, on the County Detention Center; and Mr. Cline having furnished background information on the matter and having introduced Mr. Thomas Finley, Project Manager. for the facility; and Mr. Finley having advised that the project was on schedule and within the budget, and having requested Hr. Barry Baker of Facility Sciences Corporation to review their reports on location and capacity of the proposed facility (copies of said reports having been filed with the Clark of the Board); and Mr. Baker having summarized the contents of said reports and having stated that the recommended location is within the Martinez County Civic Center and that the recommended capacity is 363 beds; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having inquired with respect to the consultant's finding on long-range requirements and provision for expansion; and Mr. Herb McLaughlin, Project Architect of the Architec- tural firm designing the project, having explained design criteria such as single cells and living areas, ease of supervision, outdoor exercise areas and building height and having displayed preliminary alternative conceptual design studies; and Mr. McLaughlin having noted that tho precise siting involved closure of streets which will be discussed with the City of Martinez and having expressed first choice for a site involving closure of Pine Street; and Board Members having inquired and commented with respect to the aforesaid presentations; and The Public '.corks Director having recommended that the following actions be taken: 1. Receipt of the Facility Sciences' reports on bed capacity and location be acknowledged; 2. In concurrence with the Detention Facility Advisory Ccc=ittee and the consultants, the Civic Canter location for the Detention Facility be approved ?. A detenticn facility bad capacity range of 370-333 beds, exclusive of medical and holding areas, be approved; and 00181 • i Supervisor J. Z. Moriarty having moved approval of the afore- said actions and said motion having been seconded by Supervisor A. H. Dias; and Mr. Frank Kroncke having asked to be heard on the question and, after discussion, the Board Members having agreed thereto; and Mr. Kroncke having stated that he represented the American Friends Service Comaittes and certain other religious groups, and having questioned the consultant's report related to capacity, stating that said report fails to indicate (what is) the goal of the Correa- tional system, that Superior Court calendaring practices consequently affect incarcerations and that statistical analysis does not compel any action and having disagreed with other aspects of the consultant's report speaking on capacity on behalf of persons with a bias against incarceration; and Members of the Board having responded that the need to replace the existing facility is not based on statistical analysis but on the documented inadequacies and inhumanities of the existing facility; and The question having been called, the vote on the motion was as follows: AYE: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. S. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, S. A. Linscheid, J. P. Benny. Nos Hone. ABSWIT: :.'One. ABSTAINS Hone. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I ASHY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Soal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September, 1976. Jean L. Miller Deputy Clerk cc: Public Works Director County Administrator Sheriff-Coroner County Counsel 00182 o SEP 10 19#6 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARRIEEIT BED C-�paCITY FORECASTS Conga Costa County Detention Facility September 8, 1976 RE EIV SEP.-?9 1976 J. ocsM CLF so of w i5CR5 e RA Facility Sciences Corporation 9100 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 90212 00183 P=filmed wi$► board order TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I SUi?v-4jry OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Z-I rinriincr- Deverly Hills, California 90212 - &acrfilmad with board order 00183 TABLE OF CW%TE 'TS ' Page SECTION I SUM-MARY Or FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS I-I Findings DFAC Subcommittee Recommendation I-1 Current Use of County Jail I-1 Straightline Projection I-1 Potential Adjustments in historical Patterns I-1 Adjusted Unsentenced ADP I-2 Adjusted Sentenced ADP I-2 Juveniles ADP I=2 Trustees ADP I-2 Summary of Forecasts I-3 Average Daily Population I-3 Peak Daily Population I-3 Conclusions I-3 SECTION II BACKGROUND II-1 Introduction II-I DFAC Report ZI-1 General t:ethodology II-2 SECTION III DETENTION CkPACITY ANALYSIS III-1 Current Uses of Detention IIZ-1 Factors Affecting Pre-Trial Detention III-1 Projection of Current Trends III-2 Booking Table 1: Unsentenced Bookings and Book Pates 1959-1975/Contra Costa County Jail III-3 Table 2: Projected Booting Trend 1980-2000/Contra Costs County Jail III-3 Table 3: Projected Average Daily Unsentenced Population/ Contra Costs County Jail III-4 SECTION IV ADJUSTED FORECASTS IV-1 Arrests IV-1 Table 4: Arrest Pates 1909-1975/ Contra Costa County IV-2 Table 5: Comparative Arrests Per 1000 Population: 1974 IV-3 Marked Criminality IV-5 00184 i TABT_.E OF CONTENTS Pale Increased Availability of Lau Enforcement Personnel and Improved Law Enforcement Technology IV-5 Decriminalization of Victimless Crimes IV-6 Adjusted Arrest Rates IV-7 Bookings IV-7 Central Booking IV-7 Table 6: Current and Projected Arrest Pates 1975-1990/ Contra Costa County, California IV-8 Table 7: Misdemeanor Releases by Jurisdiction/Contra Cosa County, California IV-9 Table 8: Current and Adjusted Misdemeanor Arrest Commitments (Central Booking)/Contra Costa County, California IV-ii Citations in Lieu of Arrest IV-12 Adjusted Booking Rate IV-13 Table 9: Adjusted Misdemeanor Arrest Committments (Field Citations)/ Contra Costa County, Calif. IV-14 Average Daily Population IV-15 Table 10: Adjusted Booking Pates and Booking Forecasts/ Contra Costa County Jail IV-16 Table 11: Comparison of Detention Releases/Alameda and Contra Costa County IV-17 III Table 12: Adjusted Unsentenced Average Daily Population/Contra Costa III County Detention Facility IV-19 0U18 ii TABLE Or CO:1ENTS Page SECTION V FORECASTED C4PACITIES V-1 Sentenced Adults V-1 Table 13: Sentenced Inmate Profile by Offense Category/Average of July 16, 17, & 19, 1976/ Contra Costa County Detention Facility V-2 Juveniles V-3 - Trustees V_4 Average Daily Population V-4 Inmate Categories V-4 Table 14: Adjusted Total Average Daily Population/Contra Costa Jail V-5 Table 15: Adult Pre-Trial Inmate Profile by Offense Category/average of Sample Days (7/16/76, 7/17/76, 7/19/76) V-6 Table 16: County Detention Facility Popu- lation Forecast by Category/ , Contra Costa County, California V-8 Peak Population Requirements V-9 .APPENDIX Methodology A-1 Application of Planning Forecasts A-3 0018 i i SECTIO\T I SMIM—kRY OF =Ih'DI.IGS AND CONCLUSIONS An analysis of detention requirements, in terms of bed capacities, was performed for the proposed Contra Costa County Detention Facil- ity. The analysis commenced with a review of the previously com- pleted analysis made by the Capacity Subcommittee of the Detention. Facility Advisory Co=ittee (DFAC). FINDINGS DFAC Subco=.ittee Recommendation. DFAC recommended t.at the detention facility be designed to provide housing for 338 persons including sentenced inmates held in maxi.-aim security and trustee status. The bed capacity does not include medical housing and spaces used for temporary holding during pro- cessing and internal r.:ovenents. Current Uses of Countv Jail Persons are currently detained in the county jail in iiartinez, the branch jail at Clayton, and County Hospital. Due to crowding, facilities in other jurisdictions are used on a contract basis to 'house prisoners of Contra Costa County. The average daily popula- tion_ of all unsentenced persons in all locations is 178; sentenced persons held in maximum security and trustee status total 53 in- mates. Total average daily population is 231 persons. Straightlire Projection A projection of future average daily detention populations can be made on the basis o_` historical trends and future population of the county. On this basis, the unsentenced average daily population could increase from the current 178 persons to 350 by year 2000. By inclusion of sentenced persons, in the same proportion as present, and tr tees, the total year 2000 bed capacity Would be 531. Potential Adjustments in Historical Patterns The rate of arrests should substantially increase as a- result of urbanization, increased law enforcement, and a continuation of an element of criminality in society; these can be counter-balanced, in part, by redefinition of crime. Bookings into detention result- ing from arrests can be reduced by increased use of citations in- lieu of formal arrest. However, the possibility of greater use cif the new detention facility as a central booking point for munici- palities would result in a net increase. The average length of stay in detention by unsentenced persons can be affected by pre- trial release programs and policies. 00187 I-1 CY Adjusted Unsentenced ADP Application of the expected impacts of significant factors, -that could increase or decrease bed capacity requirements, to historical trends, results in a forecast of 352 beds by year 2000. This slight decli.e includes the approximately 35 additional beds attributable to increased use of the detention facility for booking by muricipali ties; should the rr-+nicipal lair enforcement agencies continue existing practices, the Unsentenced bed capacity require- rent would be 317 by year 2000. Adjusted Sentenced ADP Excluding minimum security trustees currently horsed in the county jail, there are an average of 40 sentenced persons currently held in maximum security housing in Contra Costa County facilities and in other counties on a contract basis. As a ratio to the un- sentenced population, approximately 77 sentenced inmates would be housed by year 2000. Without benefit of a detailed study of the entire county corrections system, it appears that this ratio and concommitant bed capacity for sentenced persons could be reduced through provision of other facilities and programs. Even without* benefit of this additional data, it is suggested that a reduction of the current ratio of sentenced to unsentenced of 22% to 17% would protide 60 beds and should adequately acco,=odate a'_1 sent- enced persons requiring close custody housing. Juveniles ADP At present, juveniles are detained in separate facilities. A legislative bill currently being considered in the State Assembly, would require separation of juveniles, ages 16-13 who are charged' with "felonious" offenses and ciao have a previous felonious find- ing, from other detained juveniles. This has been presumed to mean that these parsons would be accommodated in the County De- tention Facility. The juvenile question is extremely nebulous at this tire, both in teras of the success of the bill and its impact. From a soma-what conservative view, it is believed that the impact, today, could require about 10 beds for juveniles expanded to 21 beds by year 2000. Trustees ADP The use of sentenced in-nates in trustee status in the new County Detention Facility is a subject of further study in this project. At present, a trustee cadre of 12 persons is typically employed in the existing County Jail to parfor3 a variety of housekeeping duties_ She=iif's staff indicated a need for approximately 35 to 40 trustees in a ne-w facility with a bed capacity of 338. This would involve trustees as 10% to 12? of the total population. Past experience in facilities of zh_s Lagr!itude have shown trustee use at 8% to 107. of total capacity. On this basis, trustees pro- vided at 9% would involve allocation of 38 beds by Year 2000. r-2 OH Sumary of Forecasts The follozring table su�arizes the adjusted forecasts prepared Z the various categories considered for housing in the proposed County Detention Facility. The numbers shown have been increased to provide capacity n ec ssary to acco=,odate typical F::ak demands. CaDaci ty recd:?reMents as determined for each planning incre--eat should not be considered as absolutes. Their purpose is to establish reasonable planning parameters and as such are represen- tative of a range of requirements that may be expected at each five-year interval. For example, actual experience mould anticipate a bed capacity requirement in 1985 between the average 336 and a maximum potential peak (+30%) of 437. Approximately one-half the peas; requirement is provided for (—'15%) or 383 beds in I985. Average Daily Population 1980 1985 1970 1595 2000 Unsentenced 219 251 285 318 352 Juveniles 13 15 17 19 21 Sentenced 37 43 49 54 60 Trustees 24 27 31 35 38 Total 293 336 382 426 471 Pea?: Daily Population Unsentenced 255 292 333 371 411 Juveniles 15 17 19 21 24 Sentenced 41 47 54 59 66 Trustees 24 27 31 35 38 . Total 335 383 437 4&6 539 CCNTCLUS IO\;S 1. The current average daily population, comprised of both unsen- tenced and sentenced adults, is now housed in several facili- ties in Contra Costa County and neighboring jurisdictions on contract. The twenty-five year forecast of this population, adjusted to reflect the potential impacts of a variety of fac- tors, suggests an average daily population by Year 2000 of approximately 471 persons. Of this total, 21 beds are attributable to the assumed effects of the Dixon bill concerning detention of selected juvenile offenders in the adult facility and 60 for close custody sentenced persons. Through application of fac- tors reflecting peak: demands and vacancies due to segregation requirements, the Year 2000 bed capacity requirement is fore- casted to be 539 beds, including 24 for juveniles and 66 for close custouy sentenced inmates. 00189 I-3 I 2. The equivalent peak requirements forecasted for the 1985 plana=ng period are a total of 333 beds including 17 for juveniles and 47 for close custody sentenced persons. 3. It is recommended that the proposed Contra Costa County Deten- tion Facility, to be located in Martinez or its environs, be planned for a rated peak capacity of 383 beds as defined by the 1985 forecasted requirements. o That steps be taken to improve local (municipal) facilities to permit continuation of decentralized booking and pre-arraignment detention in the more distant population centers rear the municipal courts having original jurisdiction. o That steps be taken in the 1985-1990 period to provide separate facilities for sentenced persons requiring medium and maximum sec-trity housing and program space. e That housing capacity provided initially for sentenced inmates in the Detention Facility (47 beds) and replaced in the 1985-1990 time fraye, be converted to use by unsentenced persons; this would continue the provision of housing space for the trustee and juvenile components as forecasted through 1990. o That additional housing for unsentenced persons (78 beds for Year 2000) be provided during the 1995-2000 time Deriod either through expansion of the Detention Facility or through development of one or more satellite facilities serving other populous reg-ons of the County; should both trustee and juvenile components of the detailed population be eliminated from the Detention Facility by this period, the additional bed capacity for unsentenced adults - ould already exist and not have to be constructed. 00190 I-4 1 SECTIO:! Il' B riCKGROMM INTRODUCTION Facility Sciences Corporation., together with Approach Associates, retained as programming consultant for the proposed Contra Costa County Detention Facility, were asked to conduct an analysis and prepare a reco=endation on the bed capacity to be accoru-nodated. The assignment specified a review of the capacity study previously prepared by the Detention Facility Advisory Committee (DFAC), which reco..ended a capacity of 338 beds, and consideration of the possi- ble impact of a series of factors identified is that report. The initial review of the DFAC reco=endation resulted in the impli- cation that several of the factors identified in the report could likely be more significant influences on capacity needs .than others. It was concluded that any analysis should attempt to obtain addi- tional information that crould permit use of a more detailed fore- casting methadology. DFAC REPORT The Detention Facility Advisory Committee, established by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, appointed a subcommittee on capacity to analyze current and future county detention requirements and make a recommendation on the bed capacity to be provided in the proposed new County Detention Facility. County staff t,as assigned to assist the subcommittee in its efforts. Staff assisted by sup- plying data, suggesting analytical methods, and by applying analy- tical techniques. The Board of Supervisors establis�ied three pre- requisites that were to guide the subcommittee in its task:l 1. That there will continue to be a maxims= utilization of pre-trial release and post-adjudication alternatives to incarceration that are currently available under existing law and consistent with the public's safety, and that the County will utilize any future alternatives that become permissible under lacy, are financially feasible, and are also consistent with the public's safety. 2. That maximum. feasible diversion from the County Detention Facility of persons such as alcoholics, narcotic addicts and the mentally ill will be pursued. 3. That the principal purpose of the facility will be to detain_ pre-trial persons who cannot be released and that only sentenced in-mates who are a security risk, have failed at less restrictive institutions, or are in a trustee or other spezial status, t=ill be held in the nett facility. The approach followed by the suhco..�..ittee generally involved pro- jection of County population age/sex cohorts by applying historical statewide incarceration rates for each cohort through the planning 1 C.C. Co. Board of Supervisors Resolution 76/201 00191 II-1 16 I period. Three alternative incarceration rates were applied; the resultant mid-range trend line %as selected for future planning purposes. During the course of its analysis, the subcotnittee compiled a list of "influencing factors". Included in the list were those factors, in addition to population growth, that could potentially increase or decrease the numbers and Types of people expected to be detained. After assessing these various factors it Bras the conclusion of the subcommittee that, "Factors. . . . will cumulatively result in no significant change in jail capacity above simple population growth."2 The method employed is described in Appendix: D of the DFAC report (May 15,1976). It vas reco=ended by the Co=ittee that bed space for 335 persons be provided, predicated on the ability to alter or expand the struc- ture in the future. In addition are terporary holding areas used in secure moving and processing of persons in the facility and per- sons held at County Hospital. This capacity includes, however, maximum security housing for sentenced inmates and minimum security housing for trustees. GEMAL METHODOLOGY The mathodology ec?loyed was a step-by-step process of analysis of available data. The specific steps taken and techniques used are described in detail in their appropriate sections of this report. Basic to this methodology was a collection of data on arrests, co=-itments, and average lengths of stay. A data base for this information was coz::piled that describes the historical and current patterns. Future needs uere forecasted as a straightline ccntiru- ation of the established pattern. Consideration was given to a variety of factors thoight to have a significant impact on future detention needs. Available data, provided by the Sheriff's Department and the California nureau of Criminal Statistics (BCS) were used and assLTptions were made.on the degree of impact. Projections ::ere thus adjusted to reflect potential future changes in requirements and programs. 2DFAC Rpt. . p.7 00192 II-2 , SECTIO:: ISI DETENTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS CURRENT USES OF DETENTION Capacity requirements for the Contra Costa County Detention Facility are dependent upon the numbers of expected users, the amount of time thev will be housed in the facility, and the administrative and oDer- atioral policies affecting these factors. Currently, all in-custody adult pro-sentence felony and county misdemeanant defendents are held in the county jail. Sentenced prisoners in trustee status or requiring "closed custody" are also incarcerated in the county jail.- In addition to acco=odating the county's detention requirements, the county jail accents prisoners from municipalities within the county as well as holds for State and Federal agencies. Currently juveniles are roused in special facilities administrated by the Probation Department. FACTORS AFFECTING PRE-TRIAL DE'Lc:TIO\ Pre-trial defendents include parsons detained after arrest and book- ing, held for arraignment, preliminary hearings, trial, and those detained during trial. The purposes of holding this group in the county jail is to insure their appearance in court and for public safety. The number of police bookings is usually the itxnediate determinate of the potential number of persons to be detained. Future demo- C, change generally foretells modifications in the number of bookings. Among the demographic factors, population growth is a highly significant and quantifiable parameter. Other components, perhaps less quantifiable, contribute to the historical increases in boolking rates per thousand population, and consequently, to the aver- age daily population (ADP) cf the detention facility. In the analysis of the DFAC Capacity Subcommittee, eleven "influencing factors" were identified as, "the most critical, in terms of evaluating capac- ity needs."l In this review. several factors, including those identi- fied by the Subcormittee, which could affect capacity requirements were identified and classified based or. that aspect of the detention process directly affected. Essentially three aspects of the detention process are affected: o Arrest rates o Booking levels a Lenth of stay in custody lReport of the Detention Facility Advisory Cc=mittee, Internal Capacity Subcommittee, dtd. 5/18/76, p.5 00193 III-1 `s Factors such as decriminalization of victimless crimes and increased availability of laza enforcement personnel affact arrest rates. In- creased use of police field citations and increased use of adult facilities for juveniles affect booking levels, while speeding up the judicial process and changes in policy regarding release-on-o-r.•e recognizance affect the length of stay in the jail. Specific influencing factors are detailed and discussed as they relate to the detention process. Some factors will increase base rates, others will tend to reduce them. For purposes of this review, each factor was analyzed independently as well as in conjunction with others. Estimates based on recent and historical statistics, the weiGhting factors assigned by the Subcommittee, interviews with responsible county officials, and the experiences of other jurisdic- tions were utilized to assess the probability of occurrence and to quantify the probably net effects of each factor. PROJECTION OF CURRENT T?.ENMS The methodology employed to forecast the average number of persons detained pending trial was predicated on booking data compiled by the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, arrest data, and a special sample of release data for tie period February - :•larch 1970' collected by the California Departoent of Justice, Bureau of Crimi- nal Statistics (BCS). County jail issues and city detention concerns, as they -relate to the county jail were eza_4ined in personal inter- vic-us :Y-ith the County Sheriff, members of the Sheriff's staff and with each of the municipal police chiefs in Contra Costa County. Co:z:ents on these matters uere also obtained from the California Highway Patrol area co «oder and the Administrative Directors of the Bay Area Rapid Transit and East Bay Regional Park Police Depart- mcnts. Booking Historical booking trends provided the data to establish a baseline projection of future capacity requirements should historical trends and current responses to arrests, bookings and releases continue unchan oed. Table 1, presents historical adult unsentenced book-in. trends for the years 1909-1975. Annual unsentenced bookings were projected b, applying time series analysis2 to the past seven years' booking rate (bookings per 1,000 county population.) and projecting this rate through the year 2000. The projected booking rate multiplied by the projected total county population3 yields the projected number of bookings. 2Least squares statistical method 3"Population Projection, Contra Costa County Jail Study 1975-2000" Contra Costa County Plannir.-, Department. III-2 OUI94 TABLE 1 MS£P:TZrCED BOOKII:GS & BOOKING R TES 1969 - 1975 CONTRA COSTA DETENTION PSCILI Y COMITY POPULATION RATE PER YEAR NO. OF BOOKINGS* (1000's) 1000 POPULA£IOZ? 1969 8,773 542.0 16.17 1970 9,613 555.8 17.30 1971 -9,673 561.2 17.24 1972 9,718 566.6 17.15 1973 10,871 572.0 19.00 1974 10,640 577.4 18.43 1975 9,758 582.8 16.74 'Source: Contra Costa County Sheriff Department TABLE 2 PROJECTED BOOKING TPW�D 1980 - 2000 . CONTRA COSTA DETEENTION FACILITY CO. POPULATION RATEE PER YEAR (1000's) 1000 POPUL.gTION FO. OF BOOKINGS 1980 625.2 19.07 11,923 1985 680.6 20.09 13,673 1990 735.1 21.12 15,525 1995 783.5 22.14 17,347 2000 826.9 23.16 19,151 ©0191 III-3 ;I :-Werage Daily Population_ (.ADP) Calculation and projection of the average daily population CADP) in the jail is a function of the total number of bookings (people) into the facility and the average length of stay (ALS) in the jail. The projected bookings are summarized in Table 2. The average length of stay was determined by multiplying the average daily population by 365 days to determine man days served. Pian days served divided by total bookings yields an average length of stay. According to Sheriff Department monthly jail re-cap statistics, the total average unsentenced daily population of the main county jail, the branch jail at Clayton and those hospitalized in 1975, was 178. Total unsentenced bookings for that year were 9,758 - (see Table 1) . The average length of stay in 1975 was, therefore, 6.67 days_ Using this figure and the projected bookings shown in Table 2, the average daily unsentenced population requiring detention in Contra Costa Count:• will be as shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 PROJECTED AVE12AGE DAILY UOSENTEPCED POPULATION CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAIL 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 PROJECTED BOOKINGS 11,923 13,673 15,525 17,347 19,151 AVERAGE LE_1GTa OF ST&Y 6.67 6.67 6.57 6.67 6.67 PROJECTED AVEPAGE DAILY POPUL�A^ION 218 250 284 317 350 The projected average daily population reflects "averages," in contrast to "peak" or periodically fluctuating demands that exceed the average. Experience indicates that peak demands, up to 30% above the average, sowetimes extend for up to one week. Allowing for half of this peak (15s) , sentenced prisoners in proportion to current experience (22% of unsentenced population) plus forty trustees, a capacity of 531 would be required -ai thin twenty-five years. Titus, should historical trends and current responses continue unchanged, projected booking rases per thousand county population indicate daily populations of 500-plus by the year 2000 based on the booking growth from 1969 to the present. 00195 III-4 t. SECTIO?:As I�r sed in 'ADJUSTED rop.ECASTS ca?acitysfor th11 n,-nI the nn` roductory no;•m r� ;" n.- - ,,rogortion to 7:a2a.e:►::=C: VL1„�ne_'� forty. cation) plusve tl .i1 v_ Lles� Ye ?7. of LY15e'a1t�=rCet� L u r- .';thint4:enY-� currant expar-erceLt-- 1 troula be required currant Yespon''s continue a trends opulation i os 7 trustees, cyshould histor3.C' her thousanc county P years- TnLs, l rates unci"-angeA projected °Ozs o- 500-Plus by the year 2000 3ase3 on indicate daily poP' �_om 1969 to the preach the boo?:ing gro.yth i 00195 III-� SECTION IV ADJUSTED FORECASTS As expressed in the introductory comments, the question of rated capacity for the proposed Detention Facility warrants consideration of factors that could modify trends as defined by actual past experience. The needs for pre-trial detention capacity are as ' dependent upon changes in system responses (including changes in } programs and policies) and crime incidence as they are affected by county population change. The process of quantifying the impact of these influences has re- quired collection and use of detailed data on booking categories, release practices, and characteristics of the detained population_. Of importance was information commpiled by the Bureau of Criminal Statistics (SCS) of the California Department of Justice on arrests is and releases from jail in Contra Costa County. The data obtained from BCS involved a two-month sample and recuired subsequent tabu- lations by the Consultant to determine the rates of pre-trial incar- ceration for various offense categories. The average lengths of stay (i.e. days held in jail) were also compiled by offense cate- gories, by the Consultant, based on the BCS sample of all releases from the Contra Costa County Jail covering the period February - iaarch 1976: By applying the rates of incarceration or eo=itment and the average lengths of stay to the projected arrests in each offense category, a baseline was established by which assessments could be made of the potential effects on caped?y requirements of various substantial demographic, policy, and programmatic charges. ARRESTS The number o; arrests per thousand population (i.e. arrest rates) indirectly reflect the incidence of crime and directly the level Of laza enforcement activity in a co=unity. The misdemeanor arrest rate for Contra Costa County re;rzired essentially stable from 1959 to 1975 (see Table 4) ; however, the felony arrest rate increased approximately 45% during this same period. If this trend were to continue, the projected number of arrests would involve most o= the population of Contra Costa County. Thus it is unlikely that the current arrest rate would continue to escalate at the same rate experienced from 1969 to 1975. A COMDarison of arrest rates for Contra Costa County with those for other counties of comparable population is shown in Table 5. Comparison of Sacramento and San Bernardino Counties, representing jurisdictions u ith populat-ion sizes similar to those expected in Contra Costa County daring the 1930-1990 period, could serve as a partial indication of the magnitude of growth in arrest rates due to Dopulation. If this co-mparison is valid, it can be concluded that Contra Costa County could experience a 201-30% increase in the adult felony arrest rate by 1985. That is, felony arrests could increase 201,-3071, more rapidly than the population growth rate. 00197 Iv-1 TABLE 4 ARREST RATES 1969-1975 CO'TRA COST. COUNTY CATEGORY 1959 1970 1971 1972 1973 197; 1975 FELONIES 5.97 6.79 7.53 7.73 8.13 9.32 8.67 CRIrZS AGAINST PERSONS 1.06 1.02 1.25 1.39 1.35 1.57 1_75 CRIMES AGAINST PROPERTY 2.23 2.58 2.72 2.56 2.69 3.30 3.07 DRUG LA%-7 VIOLATIO\S 2.15 2.68 2.93 3.17 3.37 3.59 2_73 ALL OTHER £ELO\IES .53 .51 .63 -61 .72 .86 1.12 MISDEMMMIORS 21.44 23.83 21.33 22.05 24_82 25.99 23.38 ASSAULT b BATTERi' 1_14 .94 .99 .96 1.23 1.55 1.78 PETTY THEFT 1.38 1.81 2.21 1.98 2.18 2.65 2_82 DRUNK 4.41 4.45 4.53 3.6- 3.60 3.40 3_54 DIS. CO1'DUCT/ DIS. PMCE 1.11 1.03 .88 1_13 1.05 1.23 .78 DDUNR DRI IING 5.69 8.70 5.79 6.23 9.47 9.28 8.24 DRUG OFFENSE .69 .46 .47 .53 .36 .48 .39 OTHER TRAFFIC 3.29 3.18 2.63 3.14 3_00 3.63 3_19 ALL OTHER 3.73 3.25 3.83 4_44 3.93 3_77 2.69 OU198 zE=-2 �o Ho C.. C> N r•{ O M h O - L:a M a _ �o U N O H O O O v C O O M O 2% O q i rq1 h .-t O q 2 O U " 2 Ls7 O -7 to r h M r{ Ht7 t� tT L'1 31 � O q N1; N .4 C; �.q•J a W U%D [i Tt 41 O O o of O .,>+0 q C h N V rt to oO E-4 o! N c L7 LI h c -4 If I4 Pl. 0 0� ` U < a En O Ea U3 a M >+o h s h r-, i0]�h o C to a ci 3 - > q H U e,H� to cn to to M q tj V 000-UUUL7 O ft U 43 z rn E+ H O to 4 CZ 0. to O $4 O 2 uD Q.G CL. a �-q H �Q O E- E+ O > O O $4 u c.t0.• cc a cn'a a o a v a 0 Z H H 5 a # Q O a = a 0 E• a U U 0 4 00199 IP-3 �o H O z O N to r LO .-1 %D i 4 G1 94 M C O r-1 CW .i L'1 Li r 0 M Ga M ri N O .-1 N r1 L7 w 4 H CA A , j<O U N O z - H o A O O N %D M r r w co `n a E-1 M H %D r O N L'1 M .1 aCD, cn L70r- � t13L'3U r � O � H U Z 0 ji z W O M r co N N L7 1-1 O co O H H N L7 6► N 0) � i z a .-i N G1 .-1 � N b ri � - 4-1 5 to U U] ri V P4 o a 0 0 � O C.511O O co lG 01 p O N N >n O A H O CU try r-1 .-1 N C7 to r 1 E-42 W r--1 x O n •-i .i m c•i C14N r-W cs u >U lON 0 ice+ Al `4 toH ui o M to v a) .-1 o M w q � Z r o Cl) m c 14 M N r o fvl p QE-1 O r r•1 N N M N cnv� N ae, H Zy r1 Cl �5+ »O to L7 O M co co M r cn QI 0% L'1 t Ey E-6.7. C N N C l'] r G'1 O U O O O co N M .-1 C► C7 M H k U 41 UUvL'I -u O U O $4 n.a a >+ E-#a s~ a 0 aW o E o H 2N a u-11 A. < u u z cis H o m 91 ru >• F4 z Gam-- - a A4 34 W -11 o .3 " ��"C HC. GU-., ��. La-] H 9 >+ e- &4 H Q EA+O O E+ E- a U a aU W N E� U � 0 A O O = 0 l< t!1 a G A t7 Q 0 O U .c, 00200 IV-4 a The development of arrest forecasts utilized historical adult: arrest rates per 1000 population for the years 1969-1975 (Table 4)_ Factors which could affect these baseline arrest rates in the future include: o Increased cri-.Anality o Increased availability of law enforcement personnel and improved law enforcement technology o Decriminalization of victimless crines Marked Criminality The effects of an increasing gap in social-economic status and the anticipated continued urbanization of Contra Costa County indicate a rise in both the incidence of crime and in arrests. Statistics of the California Department of Justice indicate a direct correla- tion between urbaniz- ation and in increase in arrest rates for var- ious crimes and in the incidence of crime generally. These data reflect a higher per capita incidence of reported crime and higher arrest rates in counties over 500,000 than in cozr.ties with smaller populations. However, these increases cannot be attributed to urbanization alone. There are social and economic forces, often encouraged by urbanization, that are further contributing factors to increased criminality. Crime incidence, and consequently arrest rates, have been forecasted to continue to increase as a result of continued urbanization. His- torical increases are expected to continue through 1980, after which a leveling of the =ate of increase may be anticipated if programs directed towar:'s cry.^e, delit�Guerzy and reduction 'of recidivism initiated duri— this per_-'L are effective. Increased Avai?a'hility of Law Enforcement Personnel and Improved ata TynTorcement 1ecEoiogy - - - Increased ratios of law enforcement personnel to county population along csith improved training and equipment should continue to increase incidence of reported crime and arrest rates. Adjustments have been made to arrest rates in the category "crimes against property" and thase offenses requiring specialized trainina, or technology are not expected to significantly affect crimes of passion. AlViough a significant increase in the ratio of lac: enforcement personnel to county population has occurred during the past five years, only a marginal increase in arrest rates is anticipated :Z the future, as this recent rate of increase is not expected to continue. 00201 IV-5 Decriminalization of Victimless Crimes In anticipation of changing definitions of criminal behavior and in response to the reco=endation of the National :advisory Connissior. on Crimanal Justice Standards and Goals that, "law that prohibits conduct that a substantial- minority, or majority, of the citizens finds tolerable or acceptable, could be considered for abolition, particularly if identif_ahle victims are not apparent.115, arrest rates for specific crime categories have been adjusted. Downward adjustments have been made in misdemeanor drunk and in both misdemeanor and felony narcotics and drug offense categories to reflect treatment of users and addicts of alcohol and narcotics, as medical/social problems rather than as expressions of criminality.- The President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration 'of Justice recommended that, "drunkenness should not in itself be a criminal offense. Disorderly and other criminal conduct accompanied by drunkenness should -remain punishable as separate crimes. The implementation of this recormendation requires the development of adequate civil detoxification procedures.-6 Similarly changes in attitudes towards narcotics addicts may be anticipated. The San Diego County Grand Jury recently recommended a "free heroin" plan for certified addicts. k*hile this may be thought to be an extreme proposal, it does not appear that tradi- tional "lock-em up" and more contemporary "treatment centers" or methadone maintenance programs are significantly reducing the staggering cost of property loss due to robbery and burglary com- mitted by drug users in support of their addictions. Adjustments in arrest rates were made to reflect a gradual moderate decrease in the rates of arrest for specific criWes, including robbery and burglary, in response to taking the profit out of drug trafficking in the future. The adjustments also included elimination of bookings of persons charged ;Lith drunkenness. Although persons trill continue to be arrested for other offenses :eho are also intoxicated, drunkenness, per se, can not continue to be included. Intoxicated persons should be handled in detoxification or alcohol recovery centers, either priv=ately or publicly operated. Following sobering, each case would be handled appropriately, depending upon the existence of criminal charges in addition to the problem of drunkenness. 5Criminal Justice System. National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards ai:d Goals. Standard 13.2 D. 177 6The Challenge of CriMe in a Fria Society, A Report by The Presi- ent's Co=— ission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice, 1965, p. 539 IV-6 00202 Adjusted Arrest Rates Based on these factors, it was assumed that arrests in Contra Costa County will continue to increase at faster rates than population gro:ath. Increases in arrest rates prior to 1980 are expected to reflect continuation of the rates of increase experienced during the past seven years. While continuing to increase, the rate of increase in arrests has been assumed to begin to decline after 1980 and slow considerably after 1985 as a result of system responses to crime as well as a result of a slower growth rate in the "high risk" population age group of 20-29 year old males. Estimates of numbers of arrests for the period 1990 through the year 2000 were based solely on projected county population levels. ' The uncertainty in attempting to forecast additionail changes in the various identified factors more that fifteen years in the future cannot reasonably result in any greater degree of certainty than that achieved based on population gro:urth alone. Table 6 sum..-arizes the adjusted forecast of arrest rates and total arrests after application of the effects of the various identi- fied factors. BOOKING Two significant factors, in addition to chances in arrest rates, have been identified that could modify the current booking rate in Centra Costa County. Central Booking As a result of increasing costs and the grO:,�ing possibility bili ty of Sub- stantial civil judgements arising from sub-standard detention facil- ities, municipalities in Contra Costa• Cou-ity are contemplating closing their city jails. Three cities, Concord, Antioch and Rich- mond have officially expressed their desire to the County to discontinue city jail operations. These cities, as well as Pitts- burg and El Cerrito have indicated to the Consultant that they would immediately discontinue overnight prisoner holding if reasonably scheduled pick-up service by the Sheriff were available or branch jails established. Only two cities in the county, Walnut Creek and San Pablo, indicated plans to improve their existing jails. As California statute mandates responsibility for all in-custody defendants to the County Sheriff, the possibility of a unilateral or negotiated closure of city jails could significantly increase bookings into the county jail. Currently the vast majority of in custody felony defendants are booked in the county jail. Table 7 sua arizes a limited sample of y current misdemeanor case dispositions by local jurisdiction. To assess the potential impact on county jail capacity requirements, of an administrative consolidation of all bookings under the County 00203 IV-7 3 TABLE 6 CURFENT AND PROJECTED AP•ngST RATES 1975-1990 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CA IFOR:iI$ ARAr^q+/lnnn - J".LIQ _�.LMU1'LQu_LL. U'Lly L'W&Y C lLL.S Lit (ALe ULAU.IL)F. WcL$Eiut- uLeek and San Pablo, indicated plans to improve their existing jails. As California statute mandates responsibility for all in-custody defendants to the County Sheriff, the possibility of a unilateral or negotiated closure of city jails could significantly increase bookings into the county jail. Currently the vast majority of in custody felony defendants are booked in the county jail. Table 7 st=ziarizes a limited sample of current misdemeanor case dispositions by local jurisdiction. To v assess the potential impact on county Jail capacitrequirements, z of an administrative consolidation of all booki-ngs under the County 002103 IV-7 TABLE: 6 CURRMINT AND PROJ_-ECTED ARREST WiTES 1975-1990 CONTRA COST.F, COUZIr CALIFOR:Z1T OFFENTSE CATEGORIES -ST/1000 POPULATIOZ,., 1975 1980 1985 1990 FrLo,,vlzs - CRIMES AG:41yST pE:RSO..�S 1.75 2.15 2.51 2.79 CRIUES AGAINST paopERTr DRUG L ._A!,? 3.07 3.65 4.06- VIOLhTIO44S 4.53 ALL OTHER FELONIES 3.89 3.22 3.65 3.89 1-12 1-36 1.52 ALL F_PLO�%lrl.Es 1-69 (ARRESTS) 8.67 10.38 71-74 2.91. (5-055) (6,490) (8,630) MISD:.:?.:EANORS ASSt-jULT .TT,Ep 'I, PETTLY THEFT 2.77 2.19 2-52 2.77 DRUNK 2-82 3.85 4.31 4.74 DISORDERLy CONDUCT/ DISTU-RB114G THE pZACe D-RUN"A DRIVING .78 .91 .94 .94 8.24 11.20 12.88 DRUG OFFEtTSES .39 .21 .03 14,17 OTHER TRAFFIC .03 3.19 3.43 3-60 ALL OTHER3-78 ,ZORS 2.64 3.05 ALL MISD_E�Mkk-ORS - 2.67 2.29 (ARRE:S-,S) 23.26 24.84 26.95 28-72 (13,625) (15,529) (18.342) (21,112) IV-8 092M TABLE 7 P-ELEASES BY JUR1SDICTIO_.','.'(l) COY-l-q-A COSTA COU-N-Ty. CALIF 0%IIA vr- in Sample Field/Jail/Station Azencv Inn7 1.D/ 2.29 ALLL iMISDEPMMO.RS 23.28 24.84 26.95 28_72 (ARRESTS) (13,625) (15,529) (18_342) (21,112) i s 1V-8 00204 i -77 4 �. ^ala a fi TABLE 7 MISD: F-14C RELEASES BY JURISDICTIO`:(l) COFIRA COST COM?Zi, CALT_PU:�:IA x in Sample Field/Jail/Station Sgen`y 100% Cities + ROR Bail County Court CHP 2145 (1975) - - 100%(2) - 1•:artinez 298 (1 yr.) 21% ( 63) - 77% - P.H. 698 (1975) 37% (258) 22% (154) 41% - Clayton 41 (5 mos. '75) - - 10070(3) Brentwood (Invalid data) Pinole 43 (Apr. '76) 54% ( 23) 23% ( 10) 23% - El Cerrito (Invalid data) Kensington (Negligible percentages - less than one arrest per ,,oath.) Richmond 254 (Apr. '76) 87 ( 20) 547. - 38% Concord 326 (1 mo. '76) 58% ( 3) - 42%(5) Pittsburg 45 (l 'mo. '76) 477, 367 - 17% W. C. 504 (6 mo- '75) 67% (338) 18% ( 91) - 15.% Antioch 814 (1 yr.) 690 (562) 770 ( 57) - 24% Sar_ Pablo 85 (1 mo.) 47% 36% - 17%(6) BAR 19 (1 yr.) (Negligible percentages - only 2 to County Jail) E.B.R.P. 288 (6 :o. '76) 80% - 207,(7) - (East Bay Regional Park) (1) Sample totals are less coumon drunks released on 849 P.C. or transported to a detoxification center. (2) Alnost all misdemeanants arrested b3 the CHP are intoxicated drivers requiring custody until sober. (3) 80%, of Clayton's arrests are into-xicated drivers requiring custody until sober. (4) included .a42-1h court percentage. (5) includes some arrestees held over 24 hours talo were transferred to the County Jail. (6) includes 12 arrestees released sanen no complaint filed. (7) includes IS warrant arrestees delivered d:rectl,, to mmicipa? jurisdictions. IV-9 OU205 Sheriff, two assumptions were made_ 1. As a result of significant time and distance beta:een the proposed county jail sites and cities in the pastern and western_ regions of the county, two branch jails *.-could be maintained by the Sheriff; this could involve continued use of several municipal facilities. 2. Municipal police would not significantly increase use of field citations. Assuming location of a branch jail in the :.est county region, all misdemeanor bookings for Richrsond, Pinole, Save Pablo, El Cerrito and an estimated 40% of California Highuay Patrol (CHP) bookings would be taken to this regional facility; this would be a net reauc- tion in bookings into the county jail of 23% of Pinole's, and approximately 40% of CHP misdemeanor arrests. A branch facility in the east county region could acco=odate all bookings for Pittsburg. Antioch, Brentwood and an estimated 10% of CIHP bookings. Of these four jurisdictions, only the CHP currently books a significant number of misdemeanor arrests into the county jail. Therefore the net effect of east county regional bookings on the county jail would be an approximate 10% reduction in CFIP bookings. The principal impact on the main county detention facility would result if those co=unities surrounding the 'Martinez area including i•Iartinez, Pleasant Hill, Concord, and [•Talnut Creek, discontinue their city jail operations. Table 8 su:.—rizes the net change in misdemeanor corsnitments or bookings, as a percentage of total arrests, that may occur if all county bookings were administratively consolidated with the County Sheriff. Overall, if two branch jails were established, and use of field citations were not significantly increased, the effect of central booking could increase total bookings to the main county detention facility by 20%. Since a greater percentage of the jail population would then be those charged with lesser offenses, the average length of stay would decline approximately 5-6% (from the present 6.67 to 6.30 days), chile the average unsentenced daily popu- lation would increase appro::imately 13-14% (from 178 to 202) . Although this simplistic assessment has been utilized to determine the potential impact of one central booking scheme on county detention facility capacity requiremants, the situation is far more complex. First, even if reanicioal holding facilities are maintained, there will be increased use of a new county detention facility to meet the statuatory requirements for prisoner housing and services- which can- not be provided in most city facilities (e.g. security risks, female, disturbed inmates, and sex offenders). The magnitude or local detention figures is further influenced by the crowded conditions in the existing county jail- Judges, for example, frequently sentence misdemeanants to sen—re short terms, usu- ally one day, in city jails. This practice appears to be due to overcrowding in the county detention facility as yell as inconvenient IBJ-10 00206 41y TABLE 8 CURRENT & ADJUSTED 1MISDEMEA*:OR APUREST CO IIT:��JTS (mF:TR•T , nn ,""Lvi..ott itti„ oLUr'I..L-L.tt oaa,aaut-.tom tta:a Ljlee,t ut.l.lized to determine the potential impact of one central booking scheme on county detention facility capacity requirenants, the situation is far more comulex. First, even if municipal holding facilities are maintained, there will be increased use of a new county detention facility to meet the staruatory requirements for prisoner housing and services- vhich can- not be provided in most city facilities (e.g. security risks, female, disturbed inmates, and sex offenders). The magnitude of local detention =figures is further influenced by the crowded conditions in the existing county jail. Judges, for example. frequently sentence misdemeanants to se—r-re short terms, usu- ally one day, in city jails. This practice appears to be due to overcrowding in the county detention facility as well as inconvenient IV-10 00206 TABLE 8 CLTP,RE"T & ADJUSTED ',%IISD MEA*:OR ARREST Co Zu. _• (CENTRAL BOOICIIJG) NITS CONTTRA COSTA COUIlTY, CALIFORNIA Offense Current % of Cate�o,-�, nrrests Booked Adjusted To CoLMty Jail Central Booking. Assault & Battery 24.07 Petty Theft 46% 9.5% 427, Drunk Assumed out of Criminal Justice System by 1980 Disorderly Conduct/ Distrubinethe Peace 17-7%. 447, Drunk Driving 55.6% 617v Drug Offenses 22.67, 57% Other Traffic 15.27, 32% All Other Misdemeanors 18.21, 43% 00207 IV-11 q transportation arrargements.7 The city jails often boos: and hold prisoners as an accomodacion to other agencies. The BtXT and Ken- sington departments, Tor example, boor prisoners into city jails (E1 Cerrito and Concord respectively) . The Sherif'f's prisoners which are remanded from the courts are also often held in city jails when transportation to tha county jail is not immediately available. As a result, the mere availability of new or expanded county facili- ties will positively influence current booking policies. Citations in Lieu of Arrest The second "influencing factor" identified that could modify current booking rates is the expanded use of citation in lieu of formal arrest (booking) . Expanded use of field citations would tend to reduce jail capacity requirements. Sample profiles of existing jail populations and interviews with officials in Contra Costa County justice agencies indicate that a significant portion of the existing misdemeanor jail population could be cited in lieu of arrest and short term detention before first appearance in court. Currently misdemeanor arrest policies are relatively uniform with few varia- tions occurring in cities with unique problems, (e.g. availability and convenience of holding facilities). Differences do exist in regard to utilization of field citations for misdemeanor arrests. Most Contra Costa agencies are inclined to de-emphasize field citations in favor of jail release after the arrestee has been booked and has signed a promise to appear in court. The rationale expressed for this approach is its "efficiency" i.e. identification is assured if the defendant Tails to appear in court and the offenders are saved - the "inconvenience" of making thein :say to a booking station beMyeen the time they are arrested and the time they must appear in court. Jail releases are also favored by let? enforcement administrators be- cause some judges hear cases of accused misdemeanants without requir- ing prior identification booking and then decline to issue warrants when arrestees fail to comply with the requirement. It would appear that with administrative policy changes, which are contingent upon agreements between court and law enforcement officials, the requirement of identification booking could be enforced without formal arrest. Assuming this administrative policy can be overcome, the Oakland Police Department Field Citation Program offers the cri- teria, procedure and positive approach to use of field citations in lieu of formal arrest. Recent statistics (2-11-ay, 1976) released by the Oakland Police Depart- ment indicate that 28% of the eligible misdemeanants contacted by patrol personnel are being cited and released in the field. Essen- tially six categories of offenses receive field citations. Those categories receiving citations and the percentages of reduction in total jail bookings in those categories are as follows: 711thougr legally a County responsibility, acceptance of sentenced prisoners is a gratuitous arrangement- between the cities and county. IV-12 O0208 , 1 1 MP 1 - - u Assault and Battery 18/, r Io Petty theft and credit cards 447 o Weapons 25% o Traffic 3O`h a Drug offences 32% 1 - y o All other misdemeanors 30% It should be emphasized that those persons deemed appropriate candi- dates for citation release are suspected only of minor, non-violent crimes. It is assumed that those released i•:ould be a cross section of those currently being detained, including persons both currently jail cited and those able and unable to make bond. Utilization of this program would have a significant effect on the capacity requir- ment of the county detention facility should all county bookings be consolidated administratively with the County Sheriff Department. Table 9 compares misdemeanor arrest commitment rates previously esca- lated to reflect central booking (Table 8), to those reduced rates e:_pected with achievement of percentage reductions in total bookings suggested above. Although, persons arrested for disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace and Brun1c, driving should be considered for citation release, It was assumed the cause for arrest in the majority of cases would rea_uire removal of the individual from the automobile or the place of disturbance. While removal from the place of disturbance may not result in jail book-ina the majority likely will. Thus, no adjustment was made in these categories. The utilization of this program, in conjunction with the previously- discussed central booking process, will tend to moderate reduction of the average length of stay (from the present 6.67 days to approximately 6.44 days). This upward adjustment from the previously adjusted ALS (6.30 days) results from use of field citations yielding a larger percentage of the jail population charged with more serious offenses and who generally have a longer length of stay. Adjusted Booking Rate Overall, then, if citation-=_n-lieu of arrest is vigorously and judi- ciously implemented, in conjunction with an administrative consoli- dation of count} bookings. bookings into the county jail can be ex- pected to increase by 12% while the average daily population would increase by about 7-8 .Cha aeji:sted booking rate was determined by applying the l2% increase to tae projected base rate (see Table 2, Projected Booking Trend 1930-2000). The adjusted base rate multiplied by the projected O0209 IV-13 TABLE 9 ADTdSTED i,1ISt7UMMOR ARREST CO!W-111 (FIELD CITATIONS) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adjusted % wl Offense Adjusted Central Booking Category w/Central Booking, & Field Citations Assault Battery 467, 38% Petty Theft 42% 241 Drunk. Assured out of Cr m%nal Justice Systema by 1980 Disorderly Conduct/ Distrubin� the Peace 447, 44% Dr:hk- Driving 617, 617', Drug Offenses 57% 39% Other Traffic 32% 22% All Other Misdemeanors 43; 30% See Table 8 00210 IV-14 county population_ givas the projected nuaber of bookings as shown in Table 10. AVEP4GB DAILY POPULATION Tnspaction of total releases or pre-sentence detainees for the period of February and :.arch, 1976, indicates that approximately 58% of those releases are through release on their oc.-n recognizance (ROR) or through jail citation, a "book and release" procedure. Approximately 26% are released through bail bond or posting bail in cash, with the balance released on dismissal, lack: of evidence, etc. The ma-ority of felony offenses tend to be through bail and ROR. while misdemeanor releases are predominately through jail citations. Table 11 compares Contra Costa County and Alameda County release categories_ Alar..eda County has been selected for comparison as it has a relatively gall developed pre-trial services program, and considerable experience u ith release mechanisms, such as ROR. As commarison indicates, Contra Costa County's percentage of jail citation releases is considerably greater than the Alameda County e:-perience. A large portion of this disparity may be attri- buted to a lack of jail space in Contra Costa and lack of significant use of field citations, however, use of felony ROR in Contra Costa County, essentially the only category to which DOR is applied, appears to result in a significant numbar of releases. Felony ROP, iz Contra Costa County releases appro :imateZy 27% of all felony bookings. This compares to 18% of felony releases on ROR in Berkeley, California. The available data tends to substantiate the general concensus of Contra Costa County correctional and probation officials interviewed during the course of this review- That is, the dominant notiviation, in teras of pre-trial release policies, is the lack of space in the county jail. Although release options appear to be utilized to a much greater extent than other comparable county release programs, the current pre-trial release levels appear to result from circumstantial necessity, not pre-determined, articulated release criteria or policies. There are, for example, no formal criteria for granting release-on-own-recognizance. Currently general policy is subject to the individual judgements of justice officials (i.e. , police, judges, and probabion officers). Should tate ovenrhelming fact of limited jail capacity be removed from their calculus, it is reasonable to assume the equation for release would yield fe.:er pre-trial defendersis or slow considerably their release. The findings of this review have assured current release leels can be essentially maintained as a minimum expectation, and increased in specific areas (i.e. , increased use of field citations) v ith the realization of the proposed net: county detention facility_ To reasonably maintain current release levels, and, in fact, to a%roid and correct tzhat ray be currently either excessive, inadequate or disparate release "policies," procedures and criteria for release should be articulated and instituted. All in all, it should be stressed that Contra Costa County pre-trial release levels compare "favorably" lith other jurisdictions. Viewed from the perspective of other California jurisdictions, _ IV-15 OU211 v � ,F 'V� Q C31 . CO![C14b N IL CO r-t 0% t'1+ N'1 ON 00 N N C% r-i N Y1 Ln t ri r-2 '0 co N en m{i Ln r 4 cif CQ C%[ M N " r- -4 r� r-4 VH 0" - C+ O .t %a O Ln ri ertl M 00 C? C3 N 2 0% 00 N N Lt t-i 2 r-1 t0 ri O O N OP W N O cn to C� A c^cpt . . th r4 z W qD u'f Cil rI E 94 A -4 %0 r t N r4 y� •En}+ HO C-i i V IAV r }-j W VS V L 00 CI h O J p cc a .c Co �i rt r4 to - HZ m too to Mu c. C14 a +t- FQ U4 a 0 ., 41 m cs :4 cd C) o e3 E Ca m r-i a 43 'a G O i~ 43 ci V1 -e-y Q O r3 '0 34 G C. 00212 IV—I6 t m Q a a n CC a P� R3 t3 - 'V C? J C� .-1 e4 co H a C) r- Nd L-"1Z«:+ rn •ri CO Cf � i3 �+ .% O 1 +� I1� SJ 01h � 'p{ .. a cnrz, C14 �T O ti R z H ewe. Q 1-4 o O a' IL) - z rich .a .-+ o •� J � x u E-+ - a :rI A z -:3 r- a.-i p 13 ra O e m ••r+ r3 - w ca sa cs %0 x ECi O A cv cl) ca ai z Od as L O ca a In ca u• ri Q C%l m rt to r') a r3- -fir 7.a � k' P. -a a t4 K �. a sT a.3 0 a) -rt cri rd .4 33 is a ca 43 H -4 as :.i ,-4 v O U P •.i cl C3 c) .0 C; c+ V c3 Q o cn v ri a to a ca d U to :+ r, v a a -0 :4 a :3 E � a c 00213 IV-17 I 1 t f, 1 Contra Costa County appears to have an inordinately nigh level o� releases. There does appear, however, the opporcunity to reduce the average length of stay of those felony defendants who are admitted to the detention facility and subsequently released on their own recognizance. Currently ROP. generally is utilized after arraignment and at the request of the court. As a result a number of felony defendant are held from a week to over a month prior to being released on their own recognizance. A number of factors may well explain this delay in eventual release: outstanding warrants often mist be cleared;holds of various agencies or jurisdictions may be used for unruly prisoners; the court may decide a defendant had already served a considerable portion of his or her likely sentence if found guilty, and thus reverse the court's earlier recusal to grant ROR, etc. Prone of these possible explanations are controllable, as all involve individual discretion of one justice official. It is proposed that a full pre-trial screening system, or an expanded Special Services Unit of the Probation Department's screening pro- cess to provide 24-hour-a-day screening of defendants eligible for pre-trial release be implemented in the new cou-sty detention_ facility. The proposed screening unit should result in a reduction of time spent in detention prior to ROR, and may level differences or inconsistencies between different officials or courts release policies. This proposal is patterned after Alameda County's pre- trial services program and would require access to the court after normal hours and on weekends. Currently in Alameda County, the same judge on call to sign warrants and such, also reviews the pre-trial screening units reco=endation for release. Utilizing current average length of stay by offense category, as indicated by the two month BCS sample stud,, it appears that if maximum time to release on-o.n.=-recognizance can be reduced to 5 days for felony defendants and assuming holds can be resolved, one way or the other within the saran period, (if the prisoner's hold is For parole violation, he probably u-ill not be released daring the trial; if it is for a traffic ticket, he may well be alloyed to pay the ticket and have the hold removed.) the previously adjusted average length of star of the pre-;sial papulacion would be reduced by approximately 1% (assuading central booiin o and increased u3e of field citations) from the previously adjusted 6.44 to 5.99. Application of this ALS to projected annual n-=ber of boo'_:?nos results in an ad j us ted projected pre-sentence average daily population (See Table 12)_ 00214 IL'-18 TABLE 12 ADJUSTED U\SEP:TF—MCED AVER-AGE DAILY POPULATION CONTP.A COSTA COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY 1980 1935 1990 1995 2000 PROJECTED BOOKINGS 13,374 15,314 17,385 19,431 21,450 ADJ. AVERAGE LENGTH OF STAY 5.99 5.91 5.99 5.99 5.99 PROTECTED AVERAGE DAILY POPULATION 219 251 285 318 352 0021 IV-19 SECTIO.d V FORECASTED CA?ACITIES IV-19 00215 SECTIO:: V FORECASTED CAPACITIES The previous section outlined possible actions that could effectively negate a substantial increase in fu'tu're detention capacity require- ments resulting from consolidated county boo king, increased utilization of citation-in-lied of formal arrest and booking, and an accelerated ROR program. Application of both recommendations could reasonably red-ace, by one-half, the potential impact on future capacity requirements by central booking. However, in addition to pre-trial adult defendants, three other categories of people in-custody c.•iII require space in the detention facility. e "closed custody" sentenced inmates certain juveniles o trustees SE\TENICED ADULTS Currently sentenced inmates are housed at the rehabilitation center, work furlough center, main jail, branch jail, and as a result of current facility deficiencies a limited number of inmates are housed in neighboring county detention facilities on 'a contract basis. The majority of the sentenced inmates to be accommodated in the proposed Contra Costa Detention Facility would be those "closed custody" inmates now housed in the main jail. In addition, it is assumed that those sentenced inmates occasionally housed at the branch jail would be accommodated in the proposed facility, as - would those currently held outside the county on contract. Sentenced inmates (less trustees), average a total of approximately 40 in these existing facilities, or 22; of the total average pre- trial population (178). Extrapolating this ratio of sentenced to pre-trial inmates to be accommodated in the detention facility, to forecasted year 2000 requirements, could yield 22% of 352 or approximately 77 sentenced inmates (again excluding trustees) . Without benefit of a master corrections plan, indicating potential new or expanded correctional programs or facilities that may be available for sentenced offenders, estimates of "closed custody" housing requirements in the proposed detention facility are speculative at best. It would appear, however, that should current experience continue, the sentenced population could begin to approach 80-100 inmates. During the data collection phase of the review, the Sheriff's Department provided data, subsequently compiled by the Consultant, to compose a typical pro-File of sentenced offenders by offense category. The resultant profile is sho�nl in Table 13. Although a majority of sentenced instates are class- ified "closed custody" as a result of their threat to the safety and well being of other inmates in less secure facilities, a number of them are so classified because they tend to be victims or require closer supervision for health reasons. From the sample 00;.15 V-1 TABLE 13 <W SENTEINCED IA2IATE PROFILE BY OFFENSE CATEGORY AVERAGE OF JELLY 16, 17, & 19, 19706f CONTRA COSTA COiRdTY DETENTION FACILITY OFFENSE CATEGORY % OF SENTEi':CED POPULATION Murder 3 Assault b Burglary 21 Theft 18 Forgery 15 Weapons 6 Drug Laws 3 Drunkenness 3 Traffic 9 Parole/Probation Violation 3 Contempt 3 Other Misdemeanors 10 Total- 100 Main and Branch Jails 00217, V-2 I � I � profile, approximately 254'. of "closed custody" sentenced inirates were sentenced as a result of "non-violent" crimes. Taus for purposes of anticipating capacity requirements, it is ex- pected that future correctional facilities and programs will accommodate approximately 25% of those "closed custody" inmates now housed in the county jail and in other jurisdictions. Incar- ceration of SO-100 sentenced offenders in an essentially pre-trial holding facility, without ready access to correctional programs and/or services could be inappropriate should future county or state correctional programs properly acco:.modate those non-violent offenders. Thus, future "closed custody" sentenced offenders are expected to be equal to no more than approximately 17% of the pre-trial average daily population, requiring- 60 additional beds by the year 2000. This requirement could be further reduced or totally eliminated in. the County Detention Facility by future provision of secure housing for sentenced neonle in another location such as Clayton. JUVENILES_ Legislation, now in State Assembly Committee (Assem.bly Bill No. 3121) , may result in certain Juvenile offenders being housed in the pro- posed detention taci ity. Currently, juveniles are housed in special facilities administrated by the Probation Department. The proposed legislation, if enacted, would provide for detention of Juveniles between the ages of 16 and 18, charged with specified A.elonies, generally involving serious injury or use of firearms, who have had a previous felony conviction or a previous juvenile court felony finding, to be held in the county jail. Information provided to the Consultant by the County Sheriff's Department, through the County Probation, Department, indicates that 607 of all Juvenile mall admissions are in the 16 to 18 year old age group, and that 60% of the admissions have prior admissions. However, current statistics, indicating the nature of the prior offense, are not available. Based on assumptions of percentages of current admissions meeting proposed offense and recidivism parameters, and not being released by pre-trial programs, it was estim`ted by the Sheriff's Department that 61 juveniles could require detention in the County Jail dining the course of a year under the provisions of the Assembly bill. Based on an estimated average length of stay of 120 days, the average daily juvenile population would be 20, or 11% of the current adult pre-trial ADP. It should be noted and stressed that statistics utilized in the Sheriff Department's assessment are essentially suppositions for estimaring the fiscal impact of such additional detention_ requirements and are utilized here as they constitute the current "best guess." It is strongly, urged that statistics based on the reco:.mended criteria of Assembly Bill No. 3121 be compiled by the County Probation Department over the ne..t few months to confirm these preliminary estimates. V-3 00218 tffi It u ould appear, however, that the estimated average length of stay oz: 120 days may be excessive. Although certai:tly some juveniles tray be detained in pre-trial status this long, and potentially longer in some circum tar_ces, it is unlikely the average length of stay mould be four months. For purposes of assessing future capacity requirements, 30 days was utilized as an average length of stay. Assuming, again 61 juveniles per year, an additional 1830 man days would be served in the detention facility, or an average daily population of five. Given the speculative nature of the base data, a doubling of this figure-to 10 ADP would still be one-half the initial estimate, and provide sufficient contingency for adjustment once actual data is available. Thus, the potential effect of Assembly Bill No. 3121 is estimated , to be an increase of 6% of the current adult pre-trial population. TRUSTEES Currently 12 sentenced inmates are classified as trustees, and perform general housekeeping duties, as well as mea preparation and food service in the County Jail.All are volunteers requiring minimum security housing. Intervie-us with Sheriff officials indicate s requirement for approximately 35-40 trustees to provide an equal level of service in a new facility with capacity of approximately 338 beds. In the Consultant's past experience, it has been found that trustee requirements normally equate to 8-107 or the general bed capacity in families designed within contemp- orary correctional standards. This, the required capacity for adult pre-trial defendants, closed custody sentenced offenders, and certain juvenile defendants has been augmented by 9% to accomodate 2'2iiniarum- security trustee housing. AEiM&GE DAILY POPUL:- ION 0:*esall, there were fo=r major categories of inmates projected: adult pre-trial, including time in-custody from booking through trial; "closed-custody" sentenced inmates, requiring special segre- ;atio_n and security; certain juv fenile defendants, primarily result- ing rom the potential enactment of Assembly Bill No. 3121; and trustees. Table 14 s=arizes projected capacity requirements for each category through the year 2000. INMkTE CATEGORIES During the data collection phase of this review, data were collected to compose a sample of the daily adult pre-trial population by offense category (for sentenced offender profile see Table 13). The results are sho-,,-i in Table 15. The data were collected over a Period of several days by the County Sheriff's Department and reflect an average of the daily pre-trial prisoner population during this period. To make the profiles gore use==!, the inmates have been grouped into four broad offense and judicial status categories OU,419 v-4 ■ I TABLE 14 ADJUSTED TOTAL AJ-7 DAILY POPEIP -4TION CO2ITP.9 COSTA COU:,'iY DETEtITIO:: FACILITY 1930 1985 1990 1995 2000 PIZE-T RIAL ADP 219 251 285 318 352 SENTENCED ADP (17.4) 37 43 49 54 60 JUL-\ILE DEFER;-ITS (6%) 13 15 17 19 21 TRUSTEES (97.) 24 27 31 35 - 38 TOTAL ACERAGE DAILY POPL'Z.ATIO\ 293 336 382 426 471 09"22 0 V-5 TABLE 15 ADULT_ PP.F__'raL�L ll,, ATE PROFILE BY OFFENSE CP_t:.GORY All- Arp nv cat-fPT F. DAYS (7f 16/ 76. 7117176, 7�19176) OK20 V-5 TABLE 15 ADULT_ PRE-TRLAL IMATE PROFILE BY OF FELISE CATEGORY AVEFSGE Or SMIPLE DAYS (7/16/76, 7/17/76, 7/19/76) OFFENSE CATEGORY % OF SAMPLE Murder 5.00 Assaults, Rape, Kidnap 11.66 Robbery 11.00 Burglary. Thefts, (Incl. Auto) 41.34 Weapons 1.33 .Forgery, Fraud 3.50 Receiving Stolen Property (Possession) 3.50 Sea Offenses 1.33 Drug Lax-is 5.17 DUI 3.17 Traffic 2.67 Parole/Probation Violation 5.50 w Other Felonies 1.00 Other Misdemeanors 3.67 Total 100.00: Dors not total 100% due to rounding of decimals. - 00221 v-6 i related to inmate safety and to administration of the detention facility. These are: a Inmates charged with violent crimes (murder, robbery, assault, rape, etc.) o Inmaces charged with property and other non-violent crimes (e.q. , DUI, drug offenses, forgery o Sentenced persons classified "closed custody" serving sentences in the county jail. a Sentenced persons serving as trustees in the county jail. The current profile of the main jail, utilizing this classification scheme, is as follows: Tien Women Violent Offenses 24% 40% Iron-violent Offenses 54% 15% Sentenced 17% 457 Sentenced Trustee 5% -- 1007 100% ?.iter adjustments for increased use of field citations, Central Booking and accelerated ROR, the profile should approximate the follo:.,ina: Men ["omen Violent Offenses 30, 64% Non-Violent Offenses 447. 13% Juveniles 5% 3% _ Sentenced 12% 20% Sentenced Trustee 9% 3% 100% 100% Segregation of inmates in essentially pre-trial detention facilities is for the purposes of in-mate safety and prevention of "contamina- tion" of younger, less serious. and first offenders from more experienced offenders. It should be emphasized, the criteria for segregation enployed above are for planning purposes. However, provision of segregated areas will alloy: detention administrators sufficient flexibility to isolate groups or individual inmates with- in those four categories with due regard to inmade safety, consti- tutional rights, human comfort and sound detention administration. V-7 00222 r.co to rt to to r,r~r.r, 0% .-+:rte t G+:n cv CR-44,%0 CO{- rl�.:N ^'S M t.'1-4-4 Cwt to r-ri t"1 c'I�-+1 t--O t�:4.1 M G1 r-il N�t"S .-i CV rt h1 Ei r7 O C GN O M h.4t L-1-,o to c11 t+ja C>Ln r-:.►rt( 'r ht CJ�-4 0 Cos,­4 ri MCV"t'.31 ri cn r-t'7 R:�;w� cn um �'C'"1(C:: '�:r,r to t"''I C`+i rt r-t E'!E m-:.d �:'�'1 .-?r-i e-i ri N%a c'! i^•ii`► "v d, V ::3 �-i U .�• N 0 e-1 co r4�^7 C", 0 r 4 G% CCO 00 r4 O'4 j 100%14 0114-4 >4 =t 1�7 !(UZ PQ 7 LC:L:3 H coi rl W%-4 1`,r-.r Infl r4 Co.-4p h tJ e4 0%r-11 Cry'!'`rl CS C1�-t tt(( N x": iFt 1 cn r-r-t.-3 c� cn 00 H ' O H C,) 7 ^.t 7 o cv-e M MI's: M.-+.G co�� %a.4 00'T otr, o til Cl 00 cn�1 tt't O:�-►.+�cp :..Z O < Ct M rt cn Ct b-N Q In.-d M"P 1 .4 Imo.�+.:cn l . cl m N'7 cn '�+Cr..t,!CSI Ln C7�. cQ S=a Ca3 1-1 �1 rl rt M «4 re --4 E- H 539 0.l to N O C+1`bo O.4.4;l t t0 .-i G"t�O O(a ;,,co.. N1 a l C�'f o:5+ 'U' H O hr4'-iMNt+1 CA:'1 Mn O �;rt-TM 7 ri�ri-ZM + ntpNr2'C'2�1 -c` c w V u -� 14 ii -4 e I rt +y "i rd 4�! r t r-1 ti+ Com, K z s=+ o� 1--i O H V 2 ca H :a y. 4.7 1.1 Li s� i t 0 a to 1~ Cti c103 Z/ 7 C? C3 G u G G U 0 L�3 O O O u Q zi d Z. ) p W zi G CJ > > a � > > t7! fes+ w >%: E-4 7, C.4 ?4.-w rt u to Z) .-i uO'.7, CS .-s J m v O cl e-i ;1 C*- ^O Gf r< G C)'i3 v cS O r1 u G u4-1 fit-4 U G G u C7.-i C1 J G J G ri G G G L Cl ri G O U :-1 -AOrluuO -rt 0r4uu0 -4Q--Iuua -4 Ori 000 „I 0r4U00 :.I-A-ri iK r::+ :.1-,4 4 r_ r_'r+ s.+-A,rt O r:H :.3..t-rt » :H JJ 4-4 G C:H U I G :.I :J C) 1 u %-) SJ u I C3 I.1 L u 1 G �.1 SJ G 1 0 y li aa � uu oa 0 c 00 � uu 0 0 z 0 a oo � uu r+."'.h4]•W LL7^CO to wZt]V3cn fL.?..'-3cnro ^ 2"7 C!3tn f - rl � Q 0' 123 V-8 Actual classification decis=ions should be based on the inmate conduct at the time of booking and during incarceration, on the nature of the evidence, as well as on the offense charged and judicial status. Table 16 summarizes average and peak daily inmate projections for the years 1980, 1985, 1990, and 2000. -Average peak factors are included in the table. Peat; Population Requirements The projected average daily papulation (See Table 14) reflects averages, in contrast to peal: or periodically fluctuating demands that exceed the average_ In addition, even with highly flexible design, segregation of population categories will result in vacant beds. Both occurrences are acco=odated by the peat: allocations. Review of Sheriff's Department ^onthly re-caps of detention statistics indicate that peak demands, up to 30% above the average, sometimes extend for as long as a week. Ho:reter, due to the increased size of the bed capacity and the expected housing flexibility, projected average daily populations were increased by an average of approxi- mately 15% Within this average, varying peak factors were applied to specific inmate categories, dependant upon the size of the category and required internal flexibility. Specific peak factors applied are as follows: Men T:omer. Pazentially Violear 157 30% Non-Violent 15% 30% Juveniles 15 , 157 Sentenced 10% 10% Trustees -- -- V-9 OU,c24 APPENDIX A-THODOLOGY The purpose of the Consultant's analysis of future detention capacity regLirements was to provide a review of the capacity recommendation of the Detention. Facility Advisory Committee. The methodology employed in this review was designed to facilitate quantification and, therefore, an assessment of the relative significance of those "influencing factors" as identified by the Comoittee. In review of those influencing factors, it was apparent that the majority primarily affected the pre-trial population and only indirectly the other,inmate classifications proposed to be housed. Therefore, it was necessary to identify current incarceration levels of the three major inmate classifications noir housed in the County Jail: o Pre-trial inmates o "Closed-custody" sentenced inmates o Trustees (sentenced inmates) Pre-trial bookings for the last seven years' were projected through the year 2000 to provide a baseline of expectation, assuming the experience of the past seven years were to remain constant. This baseline provided the tool by which the rela- tive impact of various potential policy changes could be assessed. The primary factor affecting the number of pre-trial bookings is the arrest rate. To provide a general guide to arrest rate increases to be anticipated over the next 20 years, California counties with population levels comparable to those expected in Contra Costa County in 1440 - 1445 were examined. mese potential rates of increase were then adjusted, by offense cate- gory, to reflect those "influencing factors" affecting arrests including: o Increased criminality o Increased law enforcement effectiveness o Redefinition of what constitutes criminal behavior e Changes in age/sex "high risk" populations It was found that the future arrest rates will continue to increase at rates faster than population growth alone would indicate, but considerably slower than that rate of increase experienced during the last 7-10 years. The resultant fore- cast of arrest rates, by offense category utas then multi- plied by the anticipated county population levels for each planning increment. The product provided the number of arrests to be anticipated in eac:i major crime category. =Previous data not available. A-1 00, 21 r P Y�ry I The commitment or booking rate, then determines the number of those arrested that will be admitted to the County Detention j Facility. To establish the current comaitment rates, by offense category, the Consultant interviewed all municipal Police Chiefs, California Highway Patrol, County Sheriff and major supplemental county law enforcement agencies. From each agency a sample of current arrests dispositions was obtained. The results indicated essentially all felony arrests are booked into the County Jail. County-wide mis- demeanor commitment rates to the existing County Jail ,.ere established for each offense category. Two "influencing factors". o Central booking * Increased use of field citations were identified that could affect future misdemeanor com* itmer_t rates. The potential affect or one administrative consolidated booking scheme was found to significantly increase the current commitment rate. The mediad-ng factor, proposing an increased utilization of field citations in lieu of formal arrest, was found to diminish the impact of central booking. However, the net result of both factors is expected to be an increase in the rare of bookings to the County Detention_ Facility. Once booked in the County Jail, the determining factor of capacity requirements is the length of stay by offense cate- gory, a ttao-month sample of all releases for the period February through March, 1976, was utilized. This sample was basad on data compiled by the California Department of Justice, Bureau of Crim=nai Statistics_ E_:amination of current release rates confirmed previous findings. That is, Contra Costa County's pre-trial release rates are among the highest in the state. Thus, opportu-Cities to increase these rates, and consequently decrease the average length of stay were considered slight. Comparison of other California counties pre-trial release programs dial indicate that the time betgeen booking and release, of those individuals eventually released on their own recognizance in Constra Costa County, could reasonably be decreased. With implementation of a full-tine Release Screening Unit, with round-the-clock access to the court, the maximum time to reach a release decision may be reduced to S days. Achievement of this release time frame would significantly reduce the average length of stay of pre-trial defendants and consequently the average daily population. Over-al?, it was found the future pre-trial population levels in the County Detention Facility are very sensitive to changes in County detention policy. When comparinb those policy factors that could potentially increase or decrease future pre-trial capacity requirements it t-.-as found that potentially A-2 00226 increasing factors far outweigh decreasing factors. Primarily, the concept of central booirg could be of major significance in establishing future pre-trial capacity levels. In addition to pre-trial inmates, "closed custody" sentenced offenders, "Dixon Bill" juveniles, and trustees are expected to be housed in the County Detention Facility. Capacity requirements for trustees were based az the Sheriff Depart- ment's recommendations and the experience of existing facilities designed within contempory correctional standards. Estimates of beds required for "closed custody" sentenced offenders were based on extrapolation of existing rates to . pre-trial defendants and, subsequently, modified downward in anticipation of new or expanded sentenced facilities accommodating a portion of t6se currently being held in the County Jail, an essentially pre-trial facility. As statistics providing required data to properly evaluate the impact of the "Dixon Bill" (AB. 3121) were not available, rough estimates made by the Sheriff's Department in cooper- ation writh the County Probation Department were review=ed and adjusted to provide a general assessment. With subsequent revisions. and enactment of this Bill, a detailed assessment is strongly urged once required data is assembled. Thus, the finding of the review verifies that the signifi- cant ig ifi- cant factor in future detention capacity* requirements will be the County's evolving policy with regard to who is incar- cerated, w=hether they will be housed in county or city detention facilities and the length of time and criteria to pre-trial release. APPLICATION OF PLANNING FORECASTS Capacity require-mems as determined for each planning increment should not be considered as absolutes. They are planning estimates, based on current available statistical data re- flectir_g, assumptions of future county detention policy, levels of criminality, and rates o incarceration. Unforturnately, a broad base of historical detention data upon which a statis- tically sound estimate of future Contra Costa County detention capacity requirements may be made is not available. The analysis conducted by the Detention Facility Advisory Committee and this review of that analysis share this cannon weakness. The DFIAC analysis and the resultant reco-!nendation was predicated upon state-wide historical cor witment rates that aggregate pre-trial, sentenced and trustee inmate categ . T orieshis methocolooy pre-supposes a correlation be- tween historical statewide experience 2nd that of Contra Costa County specifically. This methodology did not differentiate between pre-trial and sentenced populations, precluding an assessment of identified "influencing factors" on appropriate inmate population categories. 0012.7 A-3 As this review attempted to distinguish between pre-trial capacity requirements and sentenced capacity requirements to measure the relative significance of various "influencing factors", major reliance was placed on actual pre-trial booking rates ex-perienced in Concra Costa County during the past seven years. The variance of those rates and the limited period of seven years for which data was avaialbe, effectively serve to limit the confidence with which forecasts for a twenty-year period may be made. The purpose of both studies is to to establish reasonable planning parameters for a long-range building program. A considerable degree of uncertainty is al:-rays invoved in such predictions. The longer the period under study, the greater the uncertainty. This is further compounded in Contra Costa County due to an absense of a comprehansive data base. Although essentially "ma'.•:ing do" with available data, two independent surveys employing different approaches determined similar capacity requirements though 1985. Prudent review of both studies justifies confidence within 5% of forecasts through 1985. it should be noted that post-1985 requirements may be considerably less meaningful in terms of a degree confidence than the 1985 forecast. The DFAC analysis results in a significant decrease in the rate of incarceration. This review indicates the potential for continued increase in detention capacity requirements through the year 2000 predicated o: recent experience and depemdert upon policy decisions regarding alternatives to incarceration_ For this reason, year 2000 forecasts could be stated as an undefined level of demand which may, in fact, occur closer to the year 2010. For purposes of this planning study, the signi- ficance of the "year 2000" forecast capacity of 539, is in the determination of the amount of built-in expansion capacity to provide in the Contra Costa County detention system. A-4 00028 SE7 14 ;0-76 RE EIVED SEPaY 1976 J. R OLMON UE of SUKRVISORS ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS Contra Costa County Detention Facility September 8, 1976 Facility Sciences Corporation 9100 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 90212 kamfilmad with bcard order 4T"29 TABLE: 0: CMMEN'TS Page SECTT-O\ I SM^ZUA Y OF FI%DINGS &N- D CONCLUSION I_] Introduction I-1 Identification of Locations Sourcesofof Information I_2 Detention Facility Location I-3 Capital Costs I-3 Operational Costs 1-4 Functional Relationships I-4 bias ger Planning Ircplications I-5 Tima Consideration 1-6 Recomendation I-7 SECTION' II RELATED INFOMMIATION SOURCES II-1 Detention Facility Advisory Committee II-1 Environmental Impact Report 11-2 County Civic Center Plan I1-2 Central Martinez Specific Area Plan II-3 - Facility Utilization Study II-4 SECTION III ESTUNNTES OF REQUIREMENTS IIZ-1 Introduction III-1 Current Occupancies 1II-2 Occupancy Requirements III-3 - Table III-1: Inventory of Current Occupancies II1-4 Table 3II-2: Estimate of Current Occupancy Raquirements III Future Requirements ZIZ-S Table IIT-3: Estimate of Future Requirements for General Government Agencies IIZ-10 Table III-4: Estimate of Future Requirements for Justice Agencies III-11 (Civic Center Location) Table III-5: Estimate of Future Recuiremants for Jt:stice Agencies III-12 (Outside Location) Parking Requirements III-13 Official Parking III-13 Employee Parking 111-13 Visitor Parking 1II-13 Summary of Requirements 111-13 Table III-6: Sugary of Parking Stall Revuirements III-15 i O0230 Page SECTION IV PHYSIC-AL CMARAC':'ERISTICS OF LOCATIONS IV-1 Introduction IV-1 Transportation IV-1 Traffic IV-1 Accessibility IV-2 Comparison of Locations IV-3 Conclusions IV-3 Comparativ- Motes on Physical Environment of Locations IV-5 SECTION V DETENTION FACILITY LOCATION OPTI0NS V-1 Introduction V-1 Table V-1: Hypothetical Planning Requirements - Detention Facility Location Analysis V-2 Functional Considerations V-3 Co�narative Cost Considerations V-5 Capital Costs V-5 Table V-2: Schedule of Comparative Estimates of Capital Costs for Detention Facility Development (Current Dollars) V-6 Operating Costs V-7 Summary of Conclusions V-7 SECTION Vi ,;ASTER PLAN RAMIFICATIONS VI-1 Introduction VI-1 Master Plan Alternatives VI-2 Alternative I VI-3 Comparative Costs - Alternative I VI-4 Alternative II VI-5 Comparative Costs - Alternative II VI-6 Alternative III VI-7 Comparative Costs - Alternative III VI-8 Alternative IV Vi-9 Comparative Costs - Alternative IV VI-10 Comparison of Alternatives VI-11 ii OU231 i Of the Civic Center envelop, the souther-al,- blocks, bounded by Willow, i_zllus, Court and hard Screets have been identified as the potential location for the Detention Facility. The analysis of location options has, therefore, compared the impacts of selecting a site from available parcels within the do satown Civic Center and a site outside of the Civic Center as represented by the County-owned propert-y adjacent to the Interchange of Kigh:says 630 and 4. Sources of Information An effort was m?de to obtain as much significant information affecting the two locations and the locational decision as possible. Previously prepared reports were obtained and re- viewed; County and City staffs were interviewed and assisted by supplying additional data needed; the locations were visited and characteristics observed; times and distances were mea- sured; basic functional relationships between agencies v ere identified; cost information was provided by the project archi- tech for estimating relative costs. In addition, recognition and consideration were given to the policy guidelines established in resolutions adopted by the Board of Supervisors affecting the location of the Detention Facility. 1. Provide for convenient and secure access to and from the County Courts. 2. Tate into account the ,-ishes and view points of the local community, local public planning and development policies, and environmental impacts. 3. Minimize operational costs for County criminal justice agencies, city police departments, and state and federal lana enforcement agencies. 4. Facilitate the availability of social, medical and rehabilitative services to detainees and inmates. 5. Promote the reintegration of the detainee and the inmate batt: into the community such as by facilitating social contact with family and friends. The same resolution also specified, "the design and construction effort need be rade so as to minimize the delay in replace- ment of the current ;ail facility. . . ." Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California Resolution No. 76/201 OU232 I-2 DETEOT?ON FPCILITF LOCATION In Section V of this report, a comparison is made of the relative results of selecting one of the two locations as the site for the proposed Detention Facility. The comparison involved consideration of a variety of factors, both quanti- tative and qualitative, including estimates of relative capital improvement costs to construct a structure of equal capacity and purpose in either location. It was assumed, for comparison purposes, that the facility c=ould contain 350 beds and related services. Using a general guideline of 275 net square feet per bed at 65% efficiency, a structure of approximately 150,000 gross square feet would be built. CaDital Costs It was assumed, on the basis of information provided by the project architect, that a detention facility located in the Civic Center should not exceed three stories in height. The detention facility, if built at the outside location, could be a one or two-story structure. The project architect indicated that unit construction costs ould be equivilent for the structures at either location; that while certain construction costs components would be greater at one location ovar the other, they c=ould be balanced by lesser costs of other construction components. An estimate of parking requirements was made on the basis of parking stalls per bed as suggested by standards published by the National Sheriff's Association. It was assumed that additional par:cing stalls would be needed at the outside location to accommodate vehicular trips from the Civic Center otherwise accomplished on foot. Parking would all be on-grade since sufficient land c=ould be available in both the outside. and Civic Center locations to accommodate the approximately 100 stalls. As representative of all outside locations, the construction of the detention facility at the interchange of Highways 680 and 4 c=ould involve site development casts greater than those encountered in the Civic Center. Additional site work c=ould be generally required for grading, drainage, utilities, access and on-site circulation- A greater amount of land would be used at the outside location for parking and for the building, assuming design of a lower rise structure. Houever, land costs outside the Civic Center are significantly loner and the greater acreage is not an important difference, particularly if th_ land is already owned by the County. Assu?ing a cost of $25,000 per acre acqui- sition of a rive-acre site outside would involve $125,000; it has been indicated by County staff that a-pn_or_imately $300,000 would be required to acquire several privately o:.,med parcels needed to complete assemblage of a site in the Civic Center location. I-3 00233 A Using this information, it was found that relative capital improvement expenditures are essentially equivalent for the to o locations. Costs assigned to the Civic Center project were estimated at $14,026,000 compared to $13,851,000 for the outside location. It must be noted that these do not represent project budgets, since all cost categories are not estimated, but represent a statement of cost differential between the two options. Operational Costs In addition to capital costs, consideration was given to operational costs. The project architect reviewed the two proposals and indicated that physical plant operations for the hypothetical detention facility in either location Mould be the same. The differences in building height are not expected to measurably affect the costs of the operation of building systems. Similarly, staffing and program operations are belie ad to be unaffected by location. Presumably, the same capacities, services and programs :could be provided regardless of location. , There would. however, be an operational difference that penalizes the outside location. Should the detention facility` be built at a distance from the court and court-related agencies, a new element of transportation costs would be introduced. An attempt has been made in this analysis to hold constant all transport of persons-in-custody that now occurs with the existing County jail in the Civic Center; similarly, County staff (e.g. , Probation, Public Defender) commonly make trips to the co=ty jail to meet with persons in custody. The representative outside location is about five miles from the courts, which suggests the expansion of the prisoner transportation system and the use of vehicles by County staff for visits between the detention facility and the courthouse. It has been estimated that an additional transportation expense of about $65,000 per year would be experienced, including Sheriff's transportation personnel, a Sheriff's bus, mileage, and staff time loss. Functional Relationships The functional relationship between the detention facility and the Courts, Probation, Public Defender and the District Attorney, demands constant interaction of personnel. This creates a need for close proximity of those agencies to each other. In addition to the more obvious increases in transportation costs, it is expected that increased distance between agencies would contribute to the creation of inefficiencies c:hich can be substantial but are more difficult to quantify. Travel time losses would require slight additions, over time, of staff necessary to handle the same workload. The distance could result in delays of adjudication and a degree of inconvenience to personnel in the system and persons in I-4 0023 a Additional time would be required to prepare and transfer prisoners to the court and delays in release after court appear- ance could be experienced pending transportation back to the Detention Facility from the court location. With the Detention Facility and Courthouse separated, provisions would have to by The functional relationship between the detention facility and the Courts, Probation, Public Defender and the District Attorney, demands constant interaction of persennel. This creates a need for close proximity of those agencies to each other. In addition to the more obvious increases in transportation costs, it is expected that increased distance between agencies would contribute to the creation of inefficiencies which can be substantial but are more difficult to quantify. Travel time losses would require slight additions, over time, of staff necessary to handle the same workload. The distance could result in delays of adjudication and a degree of inconvenience to personnel in the system and persons in 0023 I-4 Additional time would be required to prepare and transfer prisoners to the court and delays in release after court appear- ance could be experienced pending transportation back to the Detention Facility from the court location. With the Detention Facility and Courthouse separated, provisions would have to be made to provide persons-in-custody with lunch at the Courthouse; if the Isco facilities were adjacent, food service could be accomplished in the normal manner :cithin the Detention Facility. Given the importance of the functional relationship between detention and the courts, consideration was given to the option of providing additional courts for in-custody criminal cases *ith the Detention Facility at an outside location. This would reduce or eliminate prisoner transportation by vehicle to the i:artinez Civic Center and avoid the delays and inefficiences referenced above. However, transportation of justice system personnel would still be required and a bifurcation of courts would be introduced that would cause a new set of operational inefficiencies. Representatives of both the Municipal and Superior Courts were strongly opposed to any option that would create a small branch court facility that is disfunctional due to its size and its distance from the central court admini- stration. The implication of the functional relationships between the Detention Facility and the courts and their related agencies is that use of an outside location for the Detention Facility would require either relocation of all court facilities to that site or the necessity to link the Detention Facility and courts by a transportation system with additional costs and experience a degree of operational inefficiency and inconvenience to the operators and users of the justice system. Master Planning Implications As discussed in Section VI of this report, the selection of a Detention Facility location has important long-range implica- tions for the County and the City of I-Sartinez. Phile certain individuals and groups in the co:r,,:.unity have opposed the previous Detention Facility project, other community groups and the City of Martinez have favored the redesign now underway. Much of the opposition to the previous project was due to the height of the structure and its effect on the views trem the neighboring hillside residential area. Community support for the Civic Center project has focused on the adverse economic effects on Martinez coerce of a movement of County Government to other locations. Work to date on the proposed new Detention. Facility has indicated the strong possibility of acco=, nodating detention requirements in a low-rise structure. It is believed by to project archi- tect that a design solution is possible in the Civic Center that u:ould be aesthetically pleasing within the guidelines expressed by the City of Martinez. Further, it has been shot...,n 00233 I-S s R F in Section V that construction of the Detention Facility can be accomplished on a site within the Civic Center and that adequate land exists within the boundaries to accommodate parking requirements. As has been indicated in this report, the location of the Datention Facility has long-range planning implications. Use of an outside location seQgests a rather immediate commit- ment to relocation of the closely related judicial functions to that location. from a master planning perspective, it is likely that a planned justice center -would be the result which would include adequate space to acco=odate relocated judicial services and future e::pansion needs. This, then, suggests a significant commitment to extensive capital improvements that departs from the master plan for County facilities now in effect. Use of the Civic Center location fo= the Detention Facility still requires a commitment to mai;itain adjacent related judicial services. The exploration of master planning options in Section VI indicates that expansion of court services in. the Citic Center as vell as the addition of the Detention Facility is feasible within Civic Center boundaries. However, this approach provides the County with a future- choice that use of the outside location realistically eliminates. in the future, the County may wish to increase court services in other populous areas of Contra Costa County_ As has been suggested, the development of a justice center at an outside location, in the vicinity of .i•Sartinez, would essentially limit the practicality of a branch justice center in the foreseeable future. The use of the Civic Center location offers the Coun_y the opportunity to s:nDly continue use of the existing Courthouse and the choice to continue concentration of courts in Martinez or to add some new courts in the Civic Center and some new courts in other populous locations. It is therefore concluded that, from a lona-range perspective, it would be possible to continue the historic Civic Center plan involving the location of justice agencies and the administrative core of County Government in Martinez. This would maximize utilization of existing facility resources and avoid e_penditures for replacement of court facilities that- already exist. it would further permit a staged e,aluation of options in the future relative to the degree of expansion of justice facilities in the Civic Center or introduction of branch service centers in response to continued population growth. Time Considerations Time is a highly sin- iffcant factor in the location question. Conditions in the existing Coun_y .Tail are poor due to over- crowding and a lack of adequate facilities for needed programs and services. The inadequacies of e:.isting detention .facilities Nave been recognized by the Co-----ity and its replacement with 00; 3 J 1-6 adequate facilities has been given a high priority. it is of great importance. therefore, that any unnecessary delays in providing proper facilities for detention be avoided. As discussed in the body of this report, the planning, design and construction of the neva Detention_ Facility should proceed more rapidly in the Civic Center location than in an outside location. The County has already assembled a great deal of information on the Civic Center properties needed for the project environmental impact report (EIR) . Use of an outside location aouid require additional time for data collection, analysis, and EIR preparation. Another source of delay would come from the need to select a specific site in an outside location. While the site used in this analysis at Highways 680 and 4 is representative of conditions at most potential outside locations, it is not necessarily the site that would be selected. Because of the court facility implications of constructing the Detention Facility at an outside location, time would be required to feaster plan any new site to ensure proper development. It is also possible that the outside site selected would not be County-owned. Time would be required to acquire the property, as well as additional funds. Finally, it could also be necessary that the Co-unty's general plan be amended to include use of this outaide location for a Detention Facility. ZTnile each of these factors could delay the project, several of the required activities could take place simultaneously so that the delays are not cummulative. It is our estimation that a delay of twelve to Twenty-four months should not be unexpected given the potential of site selection, acquisition, master planning, general plan amendments, EIR preparation, and public hearings. As a result of this delay, it is most probable that the buying power of the funds allocated for the proposed Detention facility would decline due to inflation. Past experience has demonstrated inflation at rates approxi- mately 1% per month compounded in construction costs. A second probable result of delay would be an increased demand to accomplish an interim solution to existing detention conditions. This could involve a variety of costly actions, including significant alterations to ezisting facilities and greater use of contract services with other jurisdictions. RECO:uy1DATI0\ As a result of this analysis, it is recomended that the Civic Center location be selected as the Detention Facility site. This conclusion is reached on the basis of several factors believed to be im-iortant to Contra Costa County and its provision o- services to its citizens: z-7 0023.1 o Project costs to operate and staff the Detentio:? Facility at either an outside location or Civic Center location are essentially equivalent. o Separation of detention from the courts and their supportive fLunctioas would likely be operationally disruptive and would increase transportation costs for prisoners and staff. o Entkronmental and architectural design problems posed by the Martinez community relative to the previously proposed detention facility can be solved through careful planning and design of a -new detention facility. o Use of the Civic Center location for the Detention Facility would comply with the County general plan now in effect and permit a continued phased pro- vision of core County facilities in the Civic Center as well as max mi.zing the County's options at future dates relative to decentralization. G Selection of an outside location would undoubtably delay the provision of adequate detention facilities,- due to selection_, acquisition and master.planning of a neer site, possible general plan amendments, and the length of time needed to collect a new set of environmental data. o Delay in the provision of adequate detention facilities would warrant immediate interim improvements in existing conditions that could be quite costly and orhazr ise avoided; in addition, delay would likely reduce the buying, porter of funds allocated for the- Detention Facility due to the effect of inflation. 00238 z-s SECTION II REL t TED TI•:FORMAT ION SOURCES The County's request that the Consultant consider the location question was predicated on a review of and response to previous related efforts. While this review involves a somewhat broader perspective than most past efforts, it has those past efforts at its foundation. Detention Facilites Advisory Committee The most recent effort was :wade by the Location Subcommittee of the Detention Facility Advisory Co=ittee (DFAC) . Its report recommended that a Civic Center site in dotintown Martinez be selected. Its recommendation was based on several significant findings: 1. Use of an outside location would require General Plan amendment and a completely new, full-scale environmental impact report both of which could delay the project. 2. No great cost differential for development of outside and civic center sites. 3. Higher construction costs in a civic center structure are balanced by costs of land acquisition, site development, utilities, and court facilities required by another site. 4. All city police departments expressed a preference for the outside location, except for Martinez (prefers civic center) and Antioch (stated no preference). 5. The Sheriff, Public Defender, and Probation Department indicated a need to be close to the detention facilities or would other::ise be affected by transportation costs; location_ of the detention facilities away from the Superior Court was strongly opposed. 6. Demographics suggest a location within a five-mile radius of the intersection of Highways 680 and 4, which includes the civic center. 7. The City of Martinez favors a civic center location and %•:ould consider necessary street closures to accomplish that objective. IZ-1 C$ The SubcorLmittee's recommendation was opposed by one member, James Hupp, who filed a minority statement. .fr. Hupp's opposition u as primarily due to the following factors: 1. Lack of adequate over-all planning. 2. Lack of sufficient data on which to base solid judgement. 3. Failure to comply with some of the guidelines. 4. Failure to assess adequately the community's wishes. 5. Undue pressure of time. 6. [*eight given the testimony by the courts. Implied in the statement and the_ list of factors is a concern that the Subcommittee's process could have resulted in a wrong conclusion. That an adequate comprehensive plan for County facilities does not exist and that time and information necessary to cost/benefit studies were not available are the primary arguments presented in opposition. Environmental Impact Report An environmental impact report (EIR) was prepared for the previously proposed detention facility. This project EIR, intended for locat-ion in the Civic Center, is the primary source of information on the dovatmrn location. In effect, the EIR is a compendium of hard data, assumptions, and official opinion on physical characteristics, favorable and unfavorable impacts, and potential alternatives. While the EIR is too extensive to properly sumerarize, it should be noted that the proposed Civic Center location may have potentially substandard soil conditions but are well served by utilities, safety services, have a solvable parking problem, and would be a continued expansion of the existing government center. The City of .Iartinez, in its 1973 Master Plan, expressed concern over encroachment of public uses into residential areas. Adjacent residents believed the project would adversely affect property values and environmental quality, including increased traffic, blockage of views, and creation o5: a building out of scale relative to the surrounding areas. Use of this location however, would maintain the functional continuity of related criminal justice agencies in one place and serve as an additional economic generator for Martinez. County Civic Center Plan A master plan for Civic Center development was prepared in 1963. The Flan considered requirements to 1955 and recommended continued development in downto,:n ?.artinez. The Plan recozMended civic center development be concentrated in the area defined 00240 II-2 by Ccurt, ;•?ellus, Willow, and Escobar Streets. It called for additional buildings for courts, administration, health, law enforcement, and detention_ Service functions, such as the corporation yard, should be centralized outside the civic center. The forecasts of requirements includ-ad in the Plan car, be summiarized as follo: s: GROSS FLOOR AREJA PARKING STALLS 1975 1985 1975 1985 Administration_ 244,200 280,600 610 701 Health 39,400 39,400 49 49 Public Assembly 60,200 68,300 354 426 Jail 50,000 50,000 87 87 Total 393,800 438,300 1,100 1,263 The recomnendations are characterized bti a closure of Pine Street, creation of open space green belts, connection of the Courthouse (Hall of Records) with a new court building arid new jail by means of an elevated corridor, and construction of two and three level paring structures. Central Martinez Specific Area Plan The General Plan of the City of Martinez was amended in 1973 to establish guidelines for the maintenance and development of the central area. Concern is expressed regarding the increased rise in County Government land use and employment and the need to ensure conformance to the co-munity`s environme,cal, residential, and commercial objectives. The expressed policies affecting the County Civic Center are: 30.341 The City and the County should keep mutually informed about significant planning decisions and other proposed public actions unich affect 'Martinez. 30,342 An agenda of current unresolved planning problems including, but rot limited to, parking, traffic circulation, and current County space requirements should be developed and discussed by City and County staff for the purpose of arriving at mutually acceptable solutions. Other actions which may affect the City of Martinez can be anticipated. 30.343 The County should be discouraged from encroaching further into developed residential neighborhoods or taking any action that threatens the stability and value of privately owned parcels. 00241 II-3 30.3�i4 hicvlt0ilit creationCo��aycoacentrated cister plan aic�centel County Policy tions comply: should be a}:aanired and prevailing plan assumptions reviewed. r, nv i--ir nt chill roanArt about sig - -F h-aLValt� bniricanr planning decisions and other -""'Ly'eu Public actions ulhich affect Martinez. Proposed 30.342 An agenda or current unresolved planning including but not liraited E circulation, and current County to, parl;i*�g, traffic circulation, and disco space requirements should be developed discussed by City and County staff for the purpose of arriving at mutually-acceptable solutions. Other actions :hich may af:ect the City of Martinez- can be anticipated, 30.343 The County should be discouraged from encroaching further into developed residential neighborhoods or any action that threatens t e taking owned p� h stability and value of Privately tercels. O0241 11-3 30.344 The viability of 'thy County Master Plan and existing County policy toward creation of a concentrated civic center complex should be examined and prevailing plan assumptions reviewed. 30.395 Any future expansion of County government shall respect the need to upgrade and consolidate uses within the central business- district through careful site selection of professional and office space. 30,345 Height, bull: and uses of proposed governmental structures shall conform to the character of the community. Facility utilization Studer - A consultant study was conducted for the County in 1975 that focused exclusively on the improved utilization of the Adminis- tration Complex. The study explored several alternative plans, each involving use of the building during the next six years. The option selected requires relocation of certain functions to space outside of the building. The most significant relocation involves the Sheriff's Department. As a supplement to this study. a rough estimate was prepared of the Quantity of space required to relocate the Sheriff. This estimate included all civic center functions of the Sheriff except for detention. Applicable data and forecasts contained in these reports have been used in this analysis. 0€1242 11-4 SECTION III ESTliLNTES OF REQUIREFIEENTS INTRODUCTION To consider a potential impact resulting from the alternative location decisions, a consistent numerical basis of space requirements is necessary. There t:as considerable difficulty in the development of a data base for evaluative purposes, as a comprehensive assessment of long-range county space requirements was not available. As a result of the lack of recent planning data on current facilities and future needs, the laek. of time to obtain accurate data, and the recognition of the purposes of this analysis, rough estimates were compiled. The information assembled was a joint effort of the Consultant and County staff. It evolved from a process of estimation and judgement and can not be justified or defended for detailed accuracy. It does, however, represent a proportioned data base that provides a tool useful in the evaluation process as long as it is used consistently. From its purpose it draws its validity. The fact that County staff has recognized the importance of a more comprehensive exploration of long-range impacts as part of the detention facility location question, and rapidly assisted in the effort, are greatly appreciated and made it possible to conduct this evaluation. In the following tables the various County agencies and departments have been divided into two sections "Justice Agencies" and "General Government Agencies" grouping them according to their relationship with the courts and other criminal justice offices or facilities. The first group, "Justice Agencies", includes the courts, their auxilliary services, the Sheriff's Department and the detention facility. Also here is the Criminal Justice Planning Agency, presently located in Concord. Although a federally funded office, it is felt that due to its service to and reliance upon the justice agencies it should be located with them whether in the Civic Center or outside location. Not included on the tables are certain branch offices that would come under this heading only in the event that the Justice Agencies are split from the General Government Agencies. _hese branches include a small copying center, mail room, auditor's office, EDP Center and facility main- tenance area for the convenience of the agencies involved. All of these functions would be headquartered with the General Government offices. I O0243 III-1 SECTION I SU:42kUt.`i OF FINDINGS MID CONCLUSIONS INTRODUCTION The selection of a location for the proposed Contra Costa County Detention Facility has been under consideration for some time. During the past several weeks, the project programming consul - C2 has given additional consideration to the location question and has prepared this report on its work and the results of that effort. The question of a location for the detention facility has been defined as a choice between sites in the County Civic Center area of do:mtowr. Martinez and locations outside of the downtown area. The location question should not be construed to involve site selection, per se, but should be recognized as a choice between two general locations, each of which can involve several specific site options. This analysis, therefore, is limited to an evaluation of the probable results of the decision to build the detention center in the downtown Civic Center area as com- pared to the impacts of not building in the Civic Center but at a location in the vicinity of Martinez. Identification of Locations There are, of course, a number of potential sites that could be used or acquired for tiie detention facility outside of the Martinez Civic Center. Several specific parcels have been addressed in previous analyses, including that of the Dentention Facility Advisory Cor.Mitcee (DFAC) . It was, therefore, necessary to identify one such property that would represent all outside lo- cations relative to a civic center location. In agreement with- County staff, the property at the northeast quadrant of the interchange of Highways 680 and 4 was selected as the represent- ative of all outside locations. It was selected because it exhibits several important characteristics of outside locations: o Already County-owned and therefore, comparable to County-oc--med Civic Center properties; a Of adequate size to accommodate low-rise construc- tion, surface parking, and future expansion; U Located near existing highways for convenient traffic access; o Essentially open undeveloped land without major constraints to functional improvement. The Civic Center location is identified as that portion of down- =:.n Martinez specified for County Government use by applicable County and City general plans. This area is generally bounded by Marina Vista, Court, Willow and vellus Streets and contains several existing Counry structures and related parking facilities. I-1 00244 i NMI It should also be noted that the Sheriff's Department and detention facility will probably be in separate buildings from the courts and other offices but still adjacent to thea, although the sheriff's operations do not absolutely require direct adjacency. The second group of agencies, those of the "General Government", are offices not directly involved in lac; and justice matters. The administration of the Probation Department has been included here at their suggestion because of their more frequent interrelations with these offices than with those of the court and related justice agencies. The Martinez adult probation office has been placed with the Justice Agencies - the rest of probation being left decentralized. Some County and related agencies having separate physical identities will be left outside the center, in their present facilities due to their own particular functional needs: o Agriculture o Comprehensive Health Planning o Cooperative Extension Service o CCC Employee's Federal Credit Union e Department of Education o Office of Emergency Services o Animal Control a Library o Medical Services o Tri-Agency Training e Social Services CURREN-T OCCUPANCIES Information on current occupancies T-.-as obtained from a variety of sources and compiled in Table 1. Areas shown in the table are expressed in net square feet This table was designed to show the amounts and locations of existing space in both the Civic Canter and elsewhere if the office in question should be with the main. body (e.g. the Criminal Justice Planning Agency presently located in Concord) . Square footages of maintenance and utility areas were omitted in this as well as the other tables. Primarily assignable spaces were tabulated although miscellaneous support space included general conference rooms, lunchroom and communica- tions. The tabulations in Table 1 thus provide a rough measure of current net area occupancies by agency and building. These two sets of values provide the consistent base useful in. cora:paring master plan and location. alternatives. 00245 III-2 OCCUFru`:CF REQUIPM�IvT%'TS An effort uas made to establish. a consistent current base for future planning that reflects the space not.: needed compared to that actually occupied. The technique was used involving net square feet per emoloyee, termed the "net area factor" (IAAF) . In Table 2, actual space now occupied was divided by the number of full-time employees (FTE) to give the existing ICAF. Current requirements were estimated by multiplying the FTE by a ne:. NAF. The new area factors were obtained and assumed from a variety of sources including the planning report preps-red for the Administration Building, rough estimates by County staff and use of commonly accepted space mannagement principles. The results in Table III-2 show estimates of quantities of additional space needed now _plus estimates of space now assigned that could possibly be allocated to another function. A caution should again be noted in the use of this information since detailed evaluations of spaces were not made; this is, therefore, simply an attempt to establish a consistent planning baseline. 0240 III-3 O C) Ln O O O C�O.7 O N O tri J O t+- tT O.:4.11 O O M PO co C) ri j 4' t t7 M L'1 r� D co C) O r"" Ccyl ri Vrn-t N W CV rw W Q cc o oMao tn--r e t t t 1 1 tnrtocs t l r>z - O.-.W . 111 Cwt t•') O U C.) '-.1 r to W -� u a t3-- o 0 o r;%0 C� e` LL W to m N C)O ri(31 C) cV W <Z .J-t t 47 t —C11 t t i ^fir t t C !X 213 C c"1 cl < J C>ti«.l rt rt -rr t3 to ' ' ro CA� a cit C t t 1 1 1 1 e l e t t Q t CO ¢ cV C,31 fi q O O W `1 v Ul Z: U'-» .� C/) -C J LLI Z�+ LL) t-1 tLco cn Q CT r al W a LL1 to C t� r co tJ o 1+"1 C% o O o C7 cn C ct3 tt'i 'S. t t CT t'ry 1 CV tty i x i tt� LL- O O - - CO 0 0 r- C y e-t cl rt }- C C> r- 7 LLi -4 x P to .�. :1 2.3 -°t c V: a U t-1 :+ zi O U U U t�3 ci a--%.^. U a ri ;.t --t 4.1 -j U Z $4 ,4 :3.x u o Li U cs u u to u :4-r4 U 0 U M :+ O rt td .^3-0 is :4 cc :3 :3 is to f3. - U :1 .\`e--I t3 0 23 :,••0 a a E U U :�A tz U CI U U to t t U4 U r+ U E " to )A ►y ¢ c ,r+ t; cr-t cs a .-+ c cc c trs IL) .� u / - j3:3 - >r a L] P $4O -1 U Clto r -ri- p � V /G cs :3 :4 u r4-A,a-A o a .-1 .^.r 0.Ff t-U4-'ID t: �"•�:-t .`3-rt U G-A- U--1-4 >%CO ry4-rt 9: C:U4 L3 [-{ U 4 4-1 C) O :a C 0 w4 O" :+ :4 :-t.!3 U U'r4 CS-r•t G O =-1 =Z U--< M— 0 U O to v 4-1 S-4 U C) E t W to O v to v g O r. .^_.CL') :1 r- c-rl=4 Q.1 1, o a .t astlZaa csaar.t .ccs a < h U A ,3r.r= tAtn ZZZU wo CJ) J J InNmIn000 OO 00000 C3 O NN gtt'IgP10�00 00 OOOGO Co M Mr--1 .-i L1, i- .•-1 CO In g M n M M Irl 1*-M S O 1.^1 O C1 O�'► � t� q F- �7 -1t1'1�7L'1TN7 3M N^ N .01 r-1 N L3 e = O OI M' q ' U LU O� ecli n LnI I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I f 1 0 - 0>11.1 N N! cn` L1 O U U rtf rl1 n cn LLI i— I9 W AUS+ N 00 O O o O C%l I I LL- LU In A 11'1 -7 C'1 O O M O In In J I co 1 I 1 1--1 1 L1 1 r-1 1 1 1 I M I M C LU < - C w O cn r-i N cn e-•i r..1 rl to < Jod 40 N M( Lnli A Q q F O Z N Z .-. In L'1 O O O O O M N In N P. Z A q N 0%%0 0 0 0 I- cn q �• R LJ 14 1 1 coMt7 1 1 1 I co 1 1 ko 1 N O M a A O 31.^1 CO 1ctom- O 1�- < <L'1 14 In N �. U � v Z � ri v 113Z co O N O O 11 O q O ri O O . r CA) <J O v1 O 1-1 1\ r` 1„L,1 L1 ca Nrt �Y v J � t1 � = O v z o t o o O o LU LU 2 q C O O n n M O 0:q 1\ O U- O O I 1 1 1 1 1 q M I I 1 1 i 'V 1 1 1 1 n to o1 O 00 C CD I � W 14 41 C1 k c > u w 0 r: O Ct. -r1 i=1 O 41 cn •rl u 0 tJ U 1, U 2.1 U G7 r4 ;1 14 LU 11 $4 O O :1 •rI .� L E C U IM r1 OJ W O U c) C.O.) a CJ ti H < F- U .-t-rt 1-I " O u c-4 C C E .-4 ? u O tf Ir Z; Z Y. Jn O U 0 O CL 34 :I $4 V C-a > $4 W 0 . v r E C-li rs> c) �CO u cn H LU U O J CL;) U.!4 -G c7 =X4 :i tea.^v m j.1 Q > - C: O = 4 ;4 :s r4 CL O O U E^ 1 U 0-4 > C3 O :7 OW-4 > aoU 0 OA s+ In UG O t:3 L C7 :+ U :I r-1•O O U N G O k O :I 0 < O I.I :I1 1:-I bO V() -U u U U C!}o r a 0 r, J r••1 w O :/ O �In O C -4-rt :4 Z-A ;.1 O rI O .•4 U } 0 -A 0 O -r1 P+U O }-=t-4-C -ri L J f ;.4 U C+ U to L-0';V r4 4J U-A J O 1:-I:J O C C14 1!1 :+ 0 U P '4 Z U -rtU-j :4-4 7:> �v'� OO-GSE C3OaUyT-R + C N Lu C: E ca-j O 0 u -0to000-A0 0 0 .-f :+ 0 :I0-.1A u V < C� G<GRbUV C-)W ==::,. ts.'c17<.L1 C7 ''7 III-S 00248 , . .. _ 2, cn .l O o 0 %0 cit 1 1 I 1 I I I I :O L N-� t7 CO cl cl H V O C)LM OOO •J%00%DO cn c)C7 Ill `D OO n.OgO t` U- n m Ln 1 t 0%00 M N M r-I-C p cn UJ q cn r4 -t mrt s21 rI T-4 r-I r4 cry O O O 00 O 001 <F- L'1 g I mm 1 O 1 1 Ill cfl r-I 1 f--LLI U r-I r♦ r4 ra r 4 r-I r-I r-c LI]C_< C/) H Lij " L:J C7 C Cl OOOOOOOOOOOL`O q C < O OO,TNO%OOOLllO%OO cn .—+ r-c OOr-Ir�Or-I 000O0%LnCO < I— LLJ Z c•1 v ra cn IY —4 ►-� L1 (-LU U M .4 c O%N 1 0 I I G%M%0 1 .--r til=< r-1 rd r-1 N r 4 r-I - V <CD !i L•, U `,`i t� < w C� LJ O OL7 OO OO Ov'IT ONC tl1 Cl i�6�O�T�'IOOc'LI`-Oa'3O d C < -7 e4%;L- r-IrJc'1elr�% mOO n U— C.-) r:}- N ri�CJ 0%r-1 w N O v' L:! N rd N C%-4 N L. Z 14 O LU (— lit .7 ONMdcn1`%0-.T 0% co C L-- to O N Ln-4 r4 1 N O m q LL N cn t� LU 3-t O o0 O 1+ C -r•1 t1 -rI �••' is > !.. 11 ru i..l -ri-r-I -ri Cl r-I L" G 1+ 0 r-I 11 i•1 Li u 1L < -r4 v 3 34 ci J:J 1•I 'ea-ri CL u O O Iola >+ :.a 7 :3 -u R. L:J c U :w G C 3 3 O O m a q u S.I Lj CJ O O u 3A CLV C) 1+< 1+ t-I U U Of < rJ O G C 0 r-1 r i G7 r A o 0-,44.3 a 0 3 ;4 $4 a :3 r-i- O C) k u_,a-rt O O.4 r^..0'aI-rt G �'- u ?.u-+•I rt tI a-.+-4 r,ri v-I =L:"1 Su ti U -14 J0.11.4 cl-rI p :+.= u u-14-rt r: Q Z 4.3r- 3 4J ,0 ra u O 0-ri-rt � 11 u W co 3U) m � O.0m0-P C C;li 3 330102492�9 U' O -400 :10 =11 =a O III-6 < ►�I v r�a:.^.EncoE,�.��irn9z n� v�•j:v III-6 i , i E r 1 cn J C t•1 NO O O tr1 O t74 M NO i 1 1 Co 1 t in i 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 N co ttJ O N%D %0 M n CQ tOI tr1` O N r"i N1 N! 111 1 u N a O p 00 OpOpin 1 �O I 'V 1 O O I 0 0 1 p t'1 0 0.;r r v M co i lL M -4T N r-i C.I.Mr-N u1-I&n 07 O CO tt) - A -T -4 r- � rn LI; r-I i O EF- atna 000 OOOO000OOuI F-Lt)u c7NLn 1 Min Irl OinMtllLnLnulLnulN 1 ` LU Of< r-i r4.-i "e-i N N r•1 r1 r-i -4-4 r4-4 r-i e-4 i .q=<Lt. N LW E r ti] OOOIn000 OOOOOOOOOIr1N N q O ^ LSI iY %3LnLnNtrlOO OIrINOOO-'1OOr,M M O < C1%c'v CT c0 q r-i u1 J r-i%0 0 0 M N O M co%O t'1 G1 t'1 1- M- CA v ul q� IT M CT u1 M G%N�i V % r-i N C N r-1 N r♦ C,I 1 0 :� 1 Z .� N els N t--7 o 1 d <)- OOn OOW t'1r`hr 0%-1MMchM n F--L..)u (;%-z r4 1 Nc23 a.vN�r-NcnO-,tq 1 .�. w C< r••r ra r 4 r-r r•1 N r••i r-1 ri r4 r•i r4 r•i r4 r-•i U C3Z<U- t_J U w CD ,CctO LJ O LU Q C): t"fN00LnCppp poNOCOooppoN C < mtnm"a%C00 OOr-Ip000aOc`) M r-i tr1� ( U -4COu1gMt--M cn Ln ;rr-M.:1OClOM %o r1 t� Cf3 u -TML'I-TLr1G1v %0 M r n LL N r4 N r-i r-1 10 N t0 O r i rl Nr M W I f-- Lt) NOM Irl•S 00 N-4 r-i O l4t N t7 O N v• Cl t1( ` F- N r-M 1 v In CT N"N O N%0 r-i 3 1 .T q M lL- 4 r4 i C 4-4 u 0 o � L U m Cf a C) u u rl S.1 C:t q U m 1:4 G R. C) C.7.1 % •ri O O u< C tc C) 10 41 L SJ -r{:4 )- < m t~ k T cc u k 00 O r 3 tZ •1 k t1 : O O :. O 14 L r-10) M CJ ca M L1 O C) co-H C)r: C a m rt CJ R. 000 p O i- u r4-.•i z1 Li -,{ O u ::% <cn m M [y C' C .••i > u O O tJ c;..J r U•rr V7 u < C O k C) '-tr rr k u k+t > -r1 r1 k ;•i :4 CI a..CI :•i u 0 u G c X k m :� U LL) u o ^ C: v 71 ^• :.4 a.'o m 13 u : Q > J S. O 0 ri :+ $4 t" O n. O :J<.!:�E-U1 O > o O C: O cn 1-4 > u 00 0 0 O-^.. k 1 ci O la cc u k U :+r-i .'7 O m co k- O 0 < p 4.) :4 1 U-4 cOC)U :+ !&U u O C:OG m c) -4 m O :i O T..U) O :+ ,.t G: .r.-ri :.i ^r-4 r•r CJ } ri m 0 r1 >,u G P%c r� •ri Lj u 1.-r 0u U k .51 L :J'D✓r 1 J u.-t J O t7 G y m•rt 4 u-ri k 4„d a:4 r) G r-4 r O a r-i Z u u O L u) E 0.0 0-a > =1— v a4 C5 cl Om cs t, m C: m u -jm :3O :3-riO 0ucac, 3-4 :4ZP0 4 u < Uj C7 <<<'rOsaUU Lalu.^..:.^.c»aca>;a. U'O/,iG.V III-7 U FUTURE REQUIREfENTS To test the alternative locational options in a comprehensive context, it uas necessary to estimate future space requirements of those functions that could be located in a government center. Since alternative master plans must not vier: the detention facility in a vacuum, both the justice and general government groups were considered. An essential guide to estimating future growth in space needs is the projection of population. Shot-in below are historical population figures obtained from the Census and California Department of Finance as well as projections supplied by the County Planning Department. Year Contra Costa County 1960 409,030 1965 492,600 1970 555,805 1975 582,829 1980 622,137 1985 671,517 2000 794,000 Table III-3 compiles forecasts of personnel and space require- ments for general government for 1980, 1985, and 2000. These forecasts were rapidly prepared and provided by County staff for use in this evaluation. An attempt was made to deal exclusively with those functions and organizational units that are seen as part of a main administrative center; branch and direct service offices dere, therefore, excluded and would be expected to continue to exist in strategic locations throughout the county. For the group of agencies comprising the justice system, two sets of forecasts were prepared for 1980, 1985 and 2000. Table III-4 reflects estimates of space needs for justice agencies predicted on the asstunption that a civic center location would be used. Table III-5 is predicated on the assumption that the outside location would be selected. The differences in the two results from the assumption that the Civic Center location would continue the existing physical bifurcation of the Mt. Diablo thmicipal Court in Concord and Martinez; in contrast, it was assumed that the outside location would result in a physical consolidation of the Municipal Court. This basic difference affects the number of unit departments that would be in a central justice cormlex as well as the number of related personnel (i.e. , public defenders and court clerks) . The basis for estimating additional court requirements was predicted on population projections for the I-It. Diablo Judicial District, as follows: ON51 IIZ-8 Year Mt. Diablo Judicial District 1960 98,537 1970 356,000 1975 167,000 1980 178,000 1985 188,000 2000 218,000 For the Majority of the justice system agencies, the courts were used as the forecasting guides. Ratios of personnel ir. court-related agencies, such as the District Attorney, Public Defender, and Court Clerk, were established from current staffing patterns and discussions with representatives of each agency. The number of departments of the Superior and Municipal Courts was forecasted on the basis of ratios of population to judges. For the Superior Court, information on county population and the numbers of Superior Court judges was assembled for several recent years. It was found that the average historical ratio is approximately 56,000 population per judge. Recent, detailed caseload analysis Tor the San Diego County Superior Court showed comparable results (54,000/judge). Using the historical average ratio of 50,000 per judge, to account: for contingencies and the fact that a caseload analysis has not been performed, results in 17 judges by year 2000. This is the forecast that has been adopted for this planning purpose. The necessary historical population data for the Mt. Diablo Judicial District u-as not available in time except for a couple recent years. This sample was felt to be too small for use. At present, however, it was found that a ratio of about 42,000 population per judge exists in the District (167,000 population per four judges) Again in San Diego County, a comparable ratio of 43,000/judge was found. For planning purposes, the ratio of 40,000/judge was used to forecast a total of 6 judges by year 2000. O(h52 III-9 E C ooa%nooO 0 n 000000 Ln Q NOON OOL1 O 00 OLnOOOO i; w 0000 Ln ON O I Own 1 ul-S Ln 9n Ln0 M O L13 10O0►17h1'lr I Ll MN C O Z M M r-i M r-1 N r-1 C*,! M O N CNI, w .700 OO L'1 O 00 OMOOO N i-- d co L t11 O N M t O tcl t O%N to L'1 r-t t ao U- N N r-1-4 14-4 r-1 M S•r t U J E Of L'I C3aLnOOO O 000000000 O U Q %OOONttlOO �-OO O ttIC>2,S O t0 OchLnCOOntn .7 t C>%0 0%r-ItC% LM r` U t'r L:J V t\00 P-.�v to r-1 ODV O^L M r-1 to > O L1'1 LL co N U CJl N C/3 r-i N }-- W w MNO r-co%o n a%0�7M00VL100 F —4 b O1 t -zr n O N r 00 N�7 r-r4 Ln T 1 N LLS U i r•r r4 r-i r-4 -rrr := J w W ►-i k G C_^, c3 1 !— < L . u w rx W C L-,00lnaooOaO0aO000 0 0 �-. E t7O0NOOLn Ori MOO Lntn0OOO It t4'N LL1 Z V3Ow1Vr� co L'1 LnL-►r-tOLnO�LnO M W C= C CO t- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. - U r-r _J —I LJ c0 u V O It O 0%to 0 r-1-n --r U Cf ::- C71 Z N N N r t r-I r-4 N 0% O k C = O r-i r r LI k— LJ_ O LL -_I Lst M% O %D It M r r-1 .-t O-LO-r`r\O It r- r\ ca U O Q i--- r\O 1 � D O N N CO r-i M'O r4 c0 It l Ln ci LL .-4.--t .-4 r♦ .-•r r-r J-0 u O %L I ra d ccn ¢u Lnoo 000 Cl C) O0000OoO W -Q L7 tll Ln 1 L'l L-1 Ln O r- -n Ln L11 Ln Ln L'1 to Ln t t !J d m Z LL r-i r-i r4 r-c r-t 1-4 N r4 .-:-9 rl r4-4 ri rd-4 f'f S•► C'„ K CS O +1 O ft4 L +4 U N V U is $4 U -A 0 41 ca C3 r-4 44 m 0 sr a cs m -rr= O p O -rt U U to -4 O U C1-r{ Ci U J J J -rr O .0 >. M U $4 44 U-84 J J J S-L O 0 w p U <J :+ O 0 :4 rt O L r-1 c- O 00 G C-r1 U t.4 i U y r♦ O 0. i r1 4 J J 0 0 E-r1 O U z C r♦ > U O J tYJ L1 C U-r1 cn O :4 U >.X---1 $4 O :1-ri > >: C k to :J ¢.cl $.; :1O. Uq Y. Saco L•t O :J C.W U� -O LC ='a p .C.-- r. c1 CS O p J C C ::14 r :+ a r-1 C 0.0 O U C `d H al 0 C3 o�.4 > 00 t � JU253 C �, v :+r{;, o c, a Co :1a � O J i4 1 44 C30U '• -U C1 U O W03 J- q 0 0 3.4 0 C C!: O C -rr-A re C-r+ ,.L 01-4 >- rr to 0 -.a T U 0 A E r=+ ,Z ,.t J O Z :S r-1 U C h J-0.7 r4 J 0-d J O Ct J 9 L;V4 of k U .3 Z -ri U-4 P.4-r1 94 $.. CO r4 q C-0 r4 q U U LL1 E 0*0 C2-.4 »— O OAC+ c3 E q 0.0 U J CA E-1 C7 '0 CO :J 0 :3 i 0 O U C] 0 0-4 to ;3 Sa CO-rt 0 E CC<==Ou UW W-"..=r. r.,C.H>;e, ti III-10 G Lt! 00000000000 OO O Q: 0 L to G r-"ammLmmr-Ln.SO C`N Co F- NCAtnt` N 'VN ONr-4 0� � O LLI r-t M r4 n ri In a% N O Z M O Cwt w un co-Z T"In%D r-vi%o n 00 01 F- 00 V4 v'n N r-1 'i M N �? LL N tL7 r-1 N r•t < z u O C 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 Co 0 Cl O O Q In N o%o-.t 0.7'0000 Ot[� t0 E-- F- MC�On�:OM�Otn� hN M LJ U L!V O t7.3 to O m N O Lr1 Z .-+M U� W J Ci0 N C L"� O !tl Ltl O+-It MNQd%Mti MOL? NO M %0O Mlnr4-4 -4 O0 N W LL N �r1 r-i O 1 Ls! LU .-+ C 00000000000 00 0 Cn Q OOONNOVOOOO 0_7 to W U VOtnNr-tnr7•.YOtnm v � v - - - - - - - - - .. - Ill CT%D M L^!0 00 N Com•ra O D - O 0 00 2 cn to f-- LU cn h LL U ELI 0cna%v h Nom:MOV` stn ri V^ r- O N L^1 r-I r i 1 O m0 O ['3 L• N �"�' 01 W t— LU � v !— fn E!- CA) 0 U 00 00 00 00 L:J 7 -< Ln 0 1 WW 1 W O t to to 1 i f Z LL r 4 r-1 r4 r 4 r4 r-i r4 r-1 O ti 1+ n O s: u O cl to -A ;4 C 1041 •4 -r4 to C :> -4 .!& C ca 4.1 uj r-!A. O 1t co y C u u G O 1+ O U :-)J k It-4 d o- U O -O'O p It O ' ILI a LL1 = as G = 0 0 0 014 C L7 14 1+ xj >� -+C) O O U U O 0 00< P 44ou CC . -4 C3 C C) rl r-i to C V U�o•.r 0 0r4 �.- n U4•++4 ._ } ^.-ri ter•{ L U-A-A C.T-4 4.C r.4•4 J U :J O $4raC-rtisP-aU :.114U"4C r-I z C<w " a r4 o C) m ter+ ,4 c 0914 U C ty a v to $ O a m c-1+ C C-.i< c :-tH O r,`C CD 0 -40� d0000 :30k SCJ 0 ((F.J III-3.1 y W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O tY L1 OOONOOOOOOtn 0 L ri 4 r- -, O a% 4 f-'1 00 f,�0 0 0 t-N ch I- N - Lr NLn-0N r-ir Vr ri 00 O+ Q W r �t rd r-11� N Ln M v O Z M O N W Ln O-TNv`Ln%D -OO f- 00 O( F- CO eh ti 00 N r4 r-I r-f 7 fr'1 N LL ra < til O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Ir L7 co OOOOTOOOO C utn N C/1 Z < fl�N 00 F- O _ - - - t- O COI7'ONthN.-1f-tA 00 G1 LJ I- LJ r-4 CI r 4.40 .-i .Y 0% O < L'1 Z C7 LJ U co O 0-1 O LO m 0M 000%m-It w-It NO �. C3 W L- 0 r-1 0 fI,r-1 r-i r-f :I O O L•I q LL N fn 14 ri a� U% O r '-' Cr O W ~ C_ v C O 0000000000 00 O < O •v OOOOOOOiAO 0LLU N - L.LI W F- tr O W rn ch r-+v�i O 0 CQ U CO th -i L7 r-i �t O W N w r--I eL UD < W .4 gMNNL-N.-LVhO �r it t�! I L F- 0 O to 0 r-L r-i r 4 N O 0% 0` O W LL N G11 U LJ F— t- L 0 tY F^ <i••- cn w U C> 0 00 00 00 LJ O < in 0 10m 1 00O I Ln L7 1 f t LL L• r-1 rt r4 r-1 r♦r-t :-d r 4 }.t O O a t0 -ri $4 G CO > -.-t .Y C I- 14 C Sa G L Z q -1-1 U.4 O 1- 32 U z-i < U J t= a C r-t 3+ >z i u Sa < O 3i O a 1J _I P :4-A fD f1 U O 'O-O 3: 34 O O U CL W x 41 < r: 4=1 Oom Cf A ;4 :4 JOO UUO iz r; rCl1 O< d = J U U 14-4� cc r- Ct U.O-11 O O r+ M.^.d C)L-i ti 4 >- Say 0..1-A " U-.t+4 f1 .4-A G C44 tf � _ ,,a f.7-r+ 3+ 34..a U U-11 C1"4 y .-1 00,4 5 z Lr fn ZJ .n r 4 U C La-rt-A E to$+ U < W O v co 2: Om fa.C6 3a a C r1 6 U :-i 0 O -1103: 0O0dzOk CU O IZI—Z2 v ..ate. .r:,. ..3... . -.. ... . ... - .. ..... _ � ,... FA%.KING £EQJIREFE,3TS The estimations of current and future parking needs were de- pendent upon selection of ratios related to personnel levels. The ratios adopted were compiled from the results of more detailed studies previously performed for other jurisdictions that have similarities in scale, function, and public trans- portation. The numbers produced by this method are signi- ficantly greater than those reflected in the County's Civic Center Master Plan prepared in 1963. (•Tnile it is possible that estimated requirements could be reduced as a result of County policy on car pools and improved public transportation, it is felt that the 1963 plan reflects estimates that are too conservative. Official Parking Official parking requirements, sho •n in Table 3IT--6, include those County owned vehicles assigned to General Government and Justice Agency functions in the Martinez area. County Corporation lard vehicles and equipment are excluded. Justice Agency vehicles include Sheriff's vehicles, both patrol and unmarked cars. Both General Government and Justice Agency requirements are less those assigned vehicles taken home at night. These vehicles are included as employee parking requirements. Forecasts of official parking requirements were based on projection of current staff to County owned vehicle ratios through the year 2000. Employee Parking Stall requirements were calculated at 75 of forecasted personnel levels. Consideration was given to the fact that certain employee groups work on shifts at hours other than normal business times. The factor also assumes that about 15% of the employees will be on leave on any given day (e.g- vacation, illness, etc.) or will use other forms of trans- portation (e.g. walk, bus, car pool, etc.) . Finally an additional 10% reduction was made in anticipation of moderate encouragement of car pooling and improver-ant of public transportation. The resultant factor of 75% coincides with that reported by Jh'K and Associates in its 1974 parking study. Visitor Parking Past experience in similar jurisdictions *:as again employed to estimate visitor parking demands. These results were reduced to ratios rel_ated to personnel levels for the justice and general government groups. The former, including jurors, represents a larger demand since most visits are of a longer duration than for the latter group. In certain cases, visitor parking was augmented to reflect the probable effects of an outside location or a split of functions into two locations. III-13 00256 aar5' _ Summary of Requirements Table III-6 tabulates the current and forecasted parking stall regulations for several intervals. Separate sets of requirements are stated for the four master plan alter- natives to be presented in Section IT:, . For convenience of reference, the alternatives are identified as: Alternative I - Justice and general government remain in Civic Center Alternative II - Justice and general government move outside Alternative M - Justice moves outside and general government remains in Civic Center Alternative IV - Justice remains in Civic Center and general government moves outside 0(151 III-14 TABLE Iii-o SU•:MIARY OF PARKING STA:,, PEW1rRZt- Y S i2UMBE,7? OF STALLS tGENCIES AND LOCATION CURD—PFT 1980 1985 2000 Alternative I General Government Agencies Employee 787 868 920 1,037 Visitor 197 217 230 259 9 1,085 171 fi—,29-o Justice Agencies Employee 452 489 542 655 Visitor 226 245 271 328 -- --1-32; �� Official Parking 140 152 163 189 Total 1,802 1,971 2,126 2,468 Alternative II Genera_ Government Agencies Employee 868 920 1,037 Augmented Visitor 226 239 269 Justice Agencies Employee 538 610 724 Augmented Visitor 279 317 376 8 7 927 1,100 Official Parking 152 163 189 Total 2,063 2,249 2,595 Altarr►ative III General Government Agencies Employee 868 930 1,037 Visitor 217 230 259 Official 51 55 63 Justice Agencies Employee 538 610 724 Aug ented Visitor 274 310 369 Official 201 108 126 91'5 1,02$ 11219 Total 2,049 2,243 2,578 Alternative IV Genera_ uo eernment Agencies Employee 868 920 1,037 Augmented Visitor 221 235 264 Oficial 51 55 63 'I,TO T—.-M I.TU Justice Agencies Employee 4S9 542 655 Visitor 245 271 328 Oficial 101 108 126 _77i X2-1 10 Total 1,975 2,131 V O�122 III-13 u SECTION 1V PHYST_C_3?. CFARACTERISTICS OF LOCATIONS INTRODUCTION The infotzzation available on the Civic Center location in do:•ntou-n Martinez is substantial in comparison with information on the outside location. The latter is scanty and lacks supplemental and supporting data. Bost information was obtained by visual inspection of the location and from inquiries made by the County staff. Only two locations were _ considered since evaluation was required primarily for the purpose of deciding whether the location should be in downtown Iiartinez or outside. These locations are the Civic Center, downto,m Martinez and the northeast quadrant of the interchange of Eighways 4 and 680. If the decision is that the location should be outside, then more alternate site locations would have to be considered. TRANSPORTATION Bus transit cannot presently be considered a major mode of transportation_ in Martinez since there is no local bus service other than the BART feedar, and the head:aays of this feeder are betwean one-half hour to one hour. Greyhound Bus Lin-ass provides nominal intercity service to Martinez. There is no b.;s service to the outside location; the nearest points of service are at the Nartinez/BAR: feeder (John Muir/ Glacier intersection) and Line 304 (Solaro/Olivera intersection). 0 ile transportation improvement by public and private modes was considered, the current status of such modes suggests the private automobile as the primary method of transportation for both employees and visitors. at the same time of occupancy and possibly long into the 20-year planning period. BART route extension planning at present indicates a probably easterly direction from Concord. No transportation improvement impact can, therefore, be expected from this source. Traffic The present status of traffic in the Civic Center location is as follows: 1. Sno=t periods of congestion occur in the vicinity of the proposed site during morning and evening commut-e hours. Mazy IV-1 I I ' Traffic volutins are increasing at_ an annual tate 2• portions o� Pacheco of about 2% except on some po and Pine Streets where the increase is More like 47. per Sear. = ut 'v Y_ .L y.L ­&- LUb u..L-LUU. DAi.l route extensionplanning at present indicate; a probably easterly direction from Corcord. No tra=isportation improvement impact car., therefore, be expected from this source. Traffic The present status of traffic in the Civic Center location is as follocrs: 1. Sno=t periods of congestion occur in the vicinity of the proposed site during mor,.=;no and evening commute hours. 00;259 IV-1 � 4 2, Traffic volumes are increasing at an annual gate of about 27 except on some portions of Pacheco and Pine Streets where the increase is more like 4Z. per year. 3. Automobiles constitute about 98% of total traffic volume and trucks about 2%. 4. Civic Center employees are utilizing about 75% of the available parking spaces in the area. 5- Peak parking times occur during the middle portion the day as visitors arrive and occasionally infringe on street parking in the adjacent residential areas - disconcerting to the residents because of the lack of on-site parking facilities. 6. In spite of a considerable amount of pedestrian in the area, no conflict exists between pedestrian and vehicular traffic. However, this situation will change with the growth of development in the Civic Center. 7. Pine Street bisects and imposes traffic through Civic Center and the residential area to the south. S. The street and block pattern in the area and level lands is that of short blocks, reflecting pre-automobile central area residential and business access needs. ACCESSIBILITY Major access into the Civic Center area is by Marina Vista- Escobar Street from the east; Pine Street-Pacheco Boulevard from the south; and several business district streets from e the west. The eastward access streets, along with the railroad right-of-ray, form a partial barrier-buffer between the Civic Center and the Suisun Bay lowlands. The combination- of ombinationof marina Vista, Escobar, 21ain, Ward and Green Streets, under lora traffic conditions, provide multiple-linkage access to the downtoum proper. Although located a short distance from the intersection of Highways 4 and 580, the outside location_ is presently accessible only from Blum Road via Pacheco Boulevard- However, road improvement plans show L--ro future principal thoroughfares which, if implemented, [,ill improve access to this outside location. One of. the thoroughfares runs north- soutn, parallel to and midway bet;�.een Highway 680 and Solano Way; at one end, is links up with Waterfront Eoad. i 00260 IV-2 1 ---------------------- . The other thoroughfare runs east-crest, just north of and parallel to Arnold Industrial Highway; at one end it links up with Solano Way and continues further east to Port Chicago Highcray. At the other ends of both thoroughfares, they converge and link- up somewhere at the south-east corner of the outside location, where a portion of the site was acquired by the Statim (3/25/76) , and then continue to HighsaY 630. COii'-DARISON OF LOCATIONS In addition to transportation and accessibility factors, a series of criteria was used to compare physical character- istics of the two locations. These have been compiled in the chart in the following pages for ease of reference and comparison. CONCLUSIO\S Size: The land area within present civic center boundaries is adequate to accommodate the Detention Facility and associated surface parking. Continued grocrth of civic center facilities could necessitate acquisition of additional land for parking or use of parking structures. Shape: The shape of the outside location site should not pose any unusual physical planning restrictions. If all centralized operations were relocated, additional land area would be required, particularly for parking. Topography Being "rae:" land, higher grading and other Geology lard development costs will be involved for C Soils: the outside location. Without soil investigation data it was not possible to estimate the effect of soil and sub-soil on building Foundation cost. Unnatural land-fill will possibly involve higher costs. CD Climate: The locations being relatively close to one another, climate differential was not considered to have any significant impact. Seismic: Although not specifically mapped, there are indica- tions of a concealed fault in the available Civic Center site. Consideration of additional safety factors in the structural design of buildings in the irr:ediate proximity of the fault may involve higher construction cost. IV-3 00261 Utilities: Utilities in the Civic Center require some alterations and replacement; those for the out- side location need connection and on-site work. The difference in capital cost will depend on the location of the proposed buildings which master planning will indicate. Adequate te7Pnhn a %-L.L41a L iLLe LocaLions oeing0 relatively close to one another, climate differential was not considered to have any significant impact. Seismic: Although not specifically mapped, there are indica- tions of a concealed fault in the available Civic Center site. Consideration of additional safety factors in the structural design of buildings in the i=ediate proximity of the fault may involv'e' higher construction cost. IV-3 00401 Utilities: Utilities in the Civic Center require some alterations and replacement; those for the out- side location need connection and on-site work. The difference in capital cost will depend on the location of the proposed buildings which master planning will indicate. Adequate telephone service for the outside location will cost more; the extent of additional cost will depend on, tbe route of the required extension cable. Fire Fire protection services for both locations Protection: were considered to be fairly comparable. Ounership No significant project delay was considered & Land Use: to be involved for both locations, since both are County-owned. If a different parcel was selected for the outside location, acquisition could be involved. Preparation of EIR and related tests and studies would be far faster- in Civic Center than outside. Legal Selection of an outside location may possibly Aspect: involve annexation proceedings. Development Future fiight funnels '?r Buchanan Field, Restriction: restricting building heights will have to be investigated. This restriction is applicable , to the site identified as the intersection of Freeways 680 and 4. However, as the site size makes low-rise development possible, this restriction is not considered significant- 00.262 IV-4 1 �, s r♦ $.1 C3 1 C).?..C-) c 41 .. U.-i $.1.0 E ca•4 J m c=3'O to o c J u 03 m •rt -ri co 4 km7= NOUJ 'Or1 A J of u 1S CS.0 3r 1+ 41 C: C3•.i 44 J U C3 OOJO -A 41 00r4G Orl -a c44 al O -r0r s %:= O 0 4.).) z > Sr J-r.,r"r x Ln 0 J-r1."r a - G 4y H J J a cn zi O 34 U • x44k um H t, 00C) cJ00041 > ca C03.1m3�+% Cob .C �o.0 -4 U U1-40u -0CJ413-4 G O 1a3 0 s 41.a - 43 a C.O Co 44 >,O a U J O O $+ 0 to c VI ra-r1 to C13+ -r1a a3mu'OU3aO - 0U .Z. W N rc J ."-1 0 to •rl O L3 > C3 O A 0.c+. 0 4 U-rt C3 u c%t U-O r, -4 E N H _l .0 to C.J .r1 0__ J a E-4 J] U C-'1'C 4.1 o O U Ra-1 c 4.1 U L-1 O o < E-4 O a T k u O to m-r1 N r1 44 U '�] .0 44 O G c 34 U $4 4a-rt C3 r-1\ 0 r O Q0r40 H0410m0 cch N..-A W y O -00 c� 0 z m " s r1 __ 0 to 34 J r- C; b J v: '3 J J m G c OC'O CS m o 2: e� 0 V C) O r- " C >-.U U _--r{ 0 r4 t► �. J c9 O u -rI r1 C 0 a J J a t,'-rt 34 m R.cl U O c 0 34 14 r-1 0 Gar+ •r1 G'C) 34 -O 0 >-r1 C.' -r1 3.1 J J -0-4 0 41.0 C 0-."1 0 0 0 0 0 3a H rl, > C3 0 to c:i C 3 3 to C•rr.-1 :.1 g= c J-0 J > w u O a JcU-4C: u0 Ulric) m z z a 0 3a tJ-rl O to 0-A O -14 > N r1 .L' ra•.-i C:7 H c-C J .r. 0 .O G .J ^„ > cl 0 W to 0 CS A F-c -4 E-1 M-.a c O O of 3.4 -O c 0 O-A=+i a te' 34 J c 41 r-1 ..a.4 10 :: 0 -r1-0 s J J m < .'3 10C)r1 ' OW CUG �sOJcSJ U Y - $4,4 C. •r1 C^J r 3.1 3.1 O 0 0 0 H n O x >.>+ >%-O­4-L) a to O r B-O C to ^ C J 3 :) 3a CS.--1 r-1 c 3 = c 34 z 44 J 3a•r1•q 3 +10 0 ­4 r4 MOorsO C3wm O .c 0 c-t L-r J C.a c .-7 .0 ;)J 0 -44 u a P. E-1 J k O O C m-rt CC c: O VA-Z-4= J 34 CO Z v to= U =•1 34 cc CSC t7 0 =41 r1 O O J > -c a ra-O q 0 r1 3 J >> .'> O O 0 A 0.v U-ri 3+ 000. CO•r1 _I u.0 m r-1 J- L $4 to 0 • 1 -4 v -i01.-1 m 0 r '� �4 3"1 Z Y- .-". C3 C.0 O -0 J > 7u .a 00a41 >>CC H z >-.-4 ­4 13 to OGScs 00 03.1 }a 00 a .4 $414 :,r 34 0 J J J 0.0 C) z H 3 U x \ 31 r-4.0 p a OZa) = mtn m r. t_I < b 0 V4 x•0.1 sal a E:co :;rr1 cC3 IV C JAS-rt ca a) > U c3 G u m-A m .-1 X 0-ri O r1 = H O C1 O 0 2J J-4 0 r1.0 Sa> a V >P1 o $4.0 E-4 m a m r: 34 :3 C.`✓ .0 ��✓^ u to U 0 0 C; rt $4 CJ m-rr PUmO ri Ua . 1-OO=41 C3 J04a 0 ci 1-4 H cy r-t-rt 4').0 0.9: O J_-t r v to O J 3�m J 3a r1 -O CJ r♦ U A>s rr 0 ra J a -a O N S4 J-4 34 S4­4 r4 10 m 3 U U r4 .0 O ^ 3 i:E: • > 0 O :: == o r4 rt C) -c3 O a J -r1 c g 34 U m 43 c3-A :) 0 C 7 J L r1.O r., r"1 t.U J rl.: 00 0 0 O 3a rLr1.0 H O $4-A a U O c O ; L J m > J O C.^ CI :3'o J O O ci -r1 tr 0 :4 rd S4 34 '" C C3 O 0 = U-O H .a0 > m r 2ir-1J 0 c30G 0L) mr1k0U140 Ul <U c; ri 3 , = u.n-rr m too 0 E E-1 o >, E-4 cc3 u u W, o v �, o L= U cn E_ IV-St1 1 0063 4i -ri .t >,v•O t•t O C) t1 d to 0-rlti o 0 :J 3 e r+ •. G`.-ri cl W CJ -ri-e7 ).t r•t lOc v -.`c > -4 -r!f.1• -4 :3 zi U m t 0 0 44-A 'O it -,a E r-i •.rr. - O }+ O O c) t J cis ai $4 lc C.4 3 tO E W. ri G W Z.i O G W cl 00 O-ri cc -4 -- C O O ca m a 3 r•i r-i 0 >+ -31 O 0 3 r-i li 0 0 k m It O $4 0 -O z) �. m m C l i (JT -ri C C >.li W O 0 is.`- ttd.O cC C-ri tt z) zi m C O H zi SJ -r.41 $-a U 0 to C r. co m C 3 Li O i-t "4 14-12 O C. la " O/^.E Ci O O= It Ul C 00 )41rN0 c; F-'.-t• kE uUIttoU cli U O O x b,rt O U CY O z) -,-t 14..r. > O U Jz 41 - t r >' kJ >n m C r4 rO+ c)U co G O c2 ? rtU U O O U C= C 1+ 044 L $4 t07 to C? 3 z:<44'a O t C m H 41 m 41 to o m 0 >+.� >% r- mCUlitordO z)U U >% r40 >. C 0 > M -.t r-t W t9 C U CO r 4,C O !: 0IZ3cE:nto O Cof Ucc 14 •44 s~ . . 0 U 1+ o CO) >. 0 cs t4-1 ai U 3 !-i N, •rt -0 aJ U 'O.-i >%--i 0 C. It 0 W 7 w zi .-.O O It P LJ O.0 :d U :J-ri ."S. O 2 tw K zJ V4 }c U ZJ C+4 -ri _ xU 0.$-$ r r-i C H OF-+ 0M 0CC2=c.C-i U .; UU Ua zi :4 44 >%,4 It r 4 O U }c It.^.. c) 11 C < < c w Q UvsJ-v -r o U C) c> .00 oro -a C :, am o ClaU WU C 43E044 >,its~ 3 c:0 O O >,+i -ri-ri�-+ ,a-ri..,.t O V O >. b - x O v-ri z)1J 3 q ZJ :J .4-4-4 > Ci a U V-t Z � t)+ f-+ :J r-i G It m t3 -j rd C C O O ZJ ?. cJ t: tJ-ri x O G U U-ri C r-+ -G'c+ -A-4 3 r-t E " m 3 : cj - x -.-3 U.. cJ k.0 U O O d M v it-O H 1+ >> CO W:J r-1 Ti U C C A' .0 O >.r, C Sa 0 b►Z-t -A ^ b r-i n •ri - O It L:. cn V2 i:. G 1+ m 0 0 > to vt C U A.4 C-,i J >41 It 0 C F-c 7 U C -,; > A u O W•O-r2 OmLj c3 34-14 U-f O O t-t U :.J 'U U pj O 0.0 41 .c U O'Z; :J G It ca li .^c. )-i r-i to k -A B. 044 Cl e a r_ zJ Z F•+ -ri m0 4i v W i m U 2.0 U Z 4J m m :i 44 U t l < >-C -^.W r4 -- Z.) tl 14 C:En It C -ri"4 m O >~ .? U it C -ri U m '.+,m --a ca 0111%0 m Q t-+ O 00 1:.'-i U s.)rt to It zi „c., O 010 It E•c .1 ss >v U x >.m•ri m >%L*- m 1+ ZJ ri t1. u >%.0 U O l• 0a a $4 r- 4r. 0E cia v 0 0 -1 -g ., m C4 0 li to 0.444 u V-ri Ori O U z, U ca r-i > cs $4 =u C s:: 7x< ::3o >-4.0000 -4 :3ZJGC.0 $4li0 al O S - c) t\ C14 UCj'O m0 � Uii U U O iJ O to —'C. C U r W= SJ 3 Ci z,l .r.. U O - li"4 C)It O 01 ti c3 O) H l+ .-+ u zi O -Z3 C a4" It a) ># 'U -ri Z! 1cPu C) $ mm-dr: I-i I u O C -3 :J m W c) O 0-4-rt U cz ca 3`„£ m L 044 MU r- O r-i v: ti cCr-i w O-ri S4 k L:I O to G-1 K7 3 t/2 4U22fi4 IV-6 u-r+ U o-ri O :4 S.1 J 0 m V. 1• m J.1 a C E r-4 - -r4 G- m m 3r C a- C3 C =O J O O c'J m :Ln -4 W -0 M" r4 0 >,0 1 U 0 O Ori 0 a3uGaJ-jb :4 ca 'O in. > -rt !Z-C; C.-r1-,..1 u r=+ N C Ira O sJ 0 C > •ri Ci E E.0 -r1 0 H m --4--4'0 --4 :4 -�-•ra V: K -r'. 1±J-ri a J U 0 a 0'0a 43UO > 0 C > -0 to ca O k 7 :-JCc u 00 > J 'o �+ 0c ao ? 3J4cU)= 0J E -00-4 m >,a > cc - U r:-r1 m -r 4 J O 0 0 O 14 z > o J o'o h 4 C4 c8 m J 3•: U G u:..G 'o O 0 cc : u � J0 Hk J UJ 34 E o3 E Oal-ri E'4 a.-C 0 Xr 0 :+ 0 34 O W>,a 3 .r.- u J 44 6 E 43,4 0 O o f r♦ 7-1 U J -ri G a 34-.A U -ri 0' --.1 U Co m 34 0 0 to 0 0 0-0 p 44 J W 0 0 u o C A.O -r1 U.0 J O .7 0 0 U a $4 14 1; 3.3 U O 34 is C3 Gz > ci = to W ri O U-ri 0 >,m 010 0 v U W -ri aJ --1 s, O 41 u O C r-♦ 31 G E U 'G" A CJ C..a .0 C T O 3i O 0 Z O m O H O o 7'o -J :4 r:--r-1 CU M U > 1.1 u 0 H co 0 a m 0-1 CO ra 0 u a'0 44-A-A F-1 E-+ J U J r-1 ch C;-ri C.O r, m O .G 34 > J < o X 0 44 Cl-ri O X E Q :+ 0 O n >%-A•11 Uo O WF] Oa3 Chu ,03NG � UG Us,HC1UG :4OJva a > av to> w}.10m :1 0 0 00 -u.0 u cr -u -r r4 - 3-1 O a. C .0 to 010 H 0 p OmOEOU Jaa-0H u r: G r-1 C > 00% c)11 O 34 $4 m J H �c- 0 44 O E a 0 r4 0 C 14 _J -ri of 0 0 a N �c Oa 1r 4-%.-4 O C = -C ca O U :4 'o aJ > }a U> z >,L a m :-1 P :4 LJ J L :a.m J J 0 0 c0 a O -% O U-r4 c 44 a - U U - a > E:-3 r1 0 r4 -•G O t~ NI O $4 U m $4 0 >,> 0 m 34 O-A-A > 0 m a b1 H C_2 3+ :JJ 0J 44mE0-nE .00 > 0 aJ Z, c41 -01U U-A Z < CW0a4aa0XO34 a Ea.:4 -r10 J r-i H z H J 0 U.^--ri O J 41 31 0 -0 0.= 0 E C. J r-4 O U --rt a> W Ey c) = E a C .'. m 0 a.J U Z 34 O U.o .a U m E t! C4 11 0 0.14 r-i J o u T m 'o O :-3 CE-4 >,W>%cc 31 a a 44 U O cl 0 c 14 O to -b +i J Y. •ri ra L 0�10 0 d cl,1-1 X c u m E 0 z > - C 31 )r r-I m m 31 U ---'100-AEc 00m O >.c: . C) aaJ 0- 'o'aC3 N Z •ri:- > Ea-00MWz100 31C .s CJ 34 a. -U CJ 00 =. 00 Ct J U-H O E a m a-J P.a 0 34 U m•rl a C a r-+,= c- J+ O J -0-ri 3-t ra C) 31 0 >,O a-z 0 � x >,M:4 - -4 C.. :4 E-1 •4 >, W0000-rim143-1 UE^ > >,a >,u ce00a.ac; A+ v--3 = O > 0" a a.0 - 31 O 0 G 10 J > 0 r r! E C-aJ U ra 00010340 r4 >, C5 CJ Cr, mm-0 a Om O a >, z O WsJOo-a-0 :3 -O 0:1= ac'1 -A Z.Ja 14 -C..) W O A 0 z 0 34 a 1-4 0 a 14-81 3 T U -- CO 0 k 0 J U V) 14't •• -rt--4 =W J W > E 0 a :.1-ri >, C-rt Cn a a 0 U 4 r4 0%0 U) r-1•o J >,14 a 0--a 34-ri m a. -A 34'c 44 -r1 J - 0 r4 W 2 U r4.0 0 a---1 m O a J O-14 U J o m J 0 10 4-1 -0 F-1 O c. < t" L c 4-1 1-c m 31 u -ri u y ,C- o m a) c •• C30 J e.'t J O N 0 E m U 0 m-J-A'0 O :4 U m :J o O 0 $4 tJ >,z cn•r1 r-1 m z F+ 0•-4 - L'-o.--i J Y- r-1 L r 4 •ri G1^m C :•ri B.1' O m o C -rt -'a N O J 0 b E 0 J A U L:I >% v a:J" P. 0-110 O a. W U 4.3 v J C[:'o J,r1 c 34 m 0 U 'o a•ri r-i a 0 $4 J N 0►-1 CCS C C to 13 -4�-1 0 0 J m 304 � c) G U C E :-3 0 C0J C3 E zi 41 m a 41 r-4 r' -Z, m :4 $4 4.1 U O C1 C 1.1 m O 0-r1 0 -A-t a.31 to O U C r4:J D-A 34J0CZ -A-140U a U 0a 14 Ea: -dEOU W 44 u En J 3.4 O cC J m 04.3 �'., bO 0 m-rt - $4 S.1 7 U 0•ri r4 i C F•1 O J C'"7, u-r- 0 c: :3 G r. 1 1.4 b J cn:-3 0 U 4 z Cly 34'o a0-rt 0440 $4kr4 -.0 0U0 > Wl >%a 0 ul -�K o -a3o= U m U.%, a 0 , -to>,C) r-1 u 34-rt 0 41 o C) 4.J 0 0 1\ZJ 0-J O :1 J a a U C u SJ G:4 34 a it 34 a n4 cs > 0 U -ri 0-A c%-A 0 -ri c)J to-r1 >,J >,w 0•-i a M 0 14 rl-.-1, U U 34 :3 $4 -1 r-1-ri J > c) •-0 44 CJ 14 •r1 >,> N �r�C+ O O.L'U 1-t J 1 H .O a-C -rs a 34a J 0 c-4 .0-A $1 0 ri 0 0 :4 -ri U U 0 r♦ t , CE34J UU1400334Ua J 00-.'3 ri :+ 3pp'0 COmrivacl H ..= 0ar-t X: , C:.~-. 0O:-33434 OoaC -4az0P UG u•,Iu U I L4.�U a 41 r^<`- m :3 CO C-0 CO P. 41 0 r-ri U x L=.L=. o L.'.a ;i J 0 to I l t U E- >r C ri 3E1 1Ci 34 E y S 1 o A 0 -4 •14 r4 cn t v U) 00;,65 IV-7 C.1 " J o C 34 _ O 44 C O - U 0 J O a : 0 -ri 0 J j 31 a U J u 0 0 O -� -r1 m J :4 > c) -a 0 0 O.M cd -G X G 3-A c= n k+Ncs e3-4 4J U a U �Z j .� G O-ri"4 O 1- 0 m-:3 J 43 a 031 J G. M r ri 0 C )+ v J :J O m U O 44 C: O - U U r1 -4 U C U +i O 1.3-1:4 'L :3 :.1 :J :1 t3 U - L U 0 U a•A 0 Cl-A L U L U r•1 C -G X $ t: 71 tr u am 0 k :+ L Cr-t O -A U r, O E U-A O-r1-A C O 1 O 0.3 L 43 t3 U Q -- U 43 t2 CL O :4 4S r1 )•1 3 ca 7 tC-A - u Z i+ O to-A E H r, L 7 r- = U 44 L M -A L ca LI - T0 O O z 0 m C L 1XV-1 4 U U E O U tll \ :J Z a U U U t;.1 to O O L 14.0 C1 .0 >%0-C3 U baz" U L G O-A 44 O U 41 U L O S'. .':. .=. H :J O C) c3.-4 U W 10 O b3 U z U a C L U-A O E-t 0:1 34 U tl 41 C O=-A to O + O-A k:-1.14 < OC >% 0-A 44 C) $: UOL CL :+ to U to U :J O r•1 u L C G>ri t- t2 L 0 t`.^. G C O U 14 C U L •r1 C) UM •m C) U,'^c, U z W 41 U 14,4 :1 -A U U:J-u O C: U O-A N $ 3 C) . O n .0 ca 0 41 G a >-A-r{r-i.O U C`.. -A C) O H H 430 C U-44L CI m > O r :+ to U S Z L U . H to s i U C)t;.1 -A G-A O m U E a :J -r-1 < &4 ra 4144 :4 :J U 3 0-,4 L ;^44 -0 C u U 3 a U a :I-A O D U tr z U 0 r•, -A r4 O 44.0 00 O O GIN .00"0U O -C - r-1tq4,3OLU r3 44 >, .1 C) U.Tr :+ to U :J ?� 3.1 U U.-1 > C: r-1 F4 U X-A.0 L C r- 0 :4 t3-A U r-1 -A -i C t1.1 CO O U U Cl L-rt U U U H :-144U00 C EEC3P03U -rt U O-A a C.' L z O C1 0 U t:.1 U CC) 0 :4 >.4"a 0 V W 0 t-1 w-4 - U 4''4 .1 :-4-t 2 ?+U U 44 4.1 U C O U•A to U -A C r'- r4 L r'. O L'1 U 0 to U.0 -.) C U u Cr r-i C:L t`O O •A 0 L 10 Ol 0 U N NI u u >%a%O Lt:ti U4 r4 Pk Ga -AUC U 4.)r4%0 r 0 0 :t O O U U -G .J z L -rt >-A 0 u Z 4 u .4 U U T4 H C U -.-1 C: w C E O-O to M 4; U .0 .~.r-4 - H U.r+ m `1-A 0 H u C 44 L r•1 ►= L:J L u U 0=4 141 O 0 $4 .-1 C L v O •-1 t3-A L -0 C O-A-A O -A L-A H OU >. :+ ^, O k-A = Q, w > C: M 7 4' t;i r I U C) t:1 ),t C C U E q "O-A G >4 •:3- '"1 r1 a 2.)'C U G'A-A -^, U O IM- Z L C U C) L�4-A :.1 Z C-+ H i U U-.4 CJ :a '.-t z to 3 c L U A C A tq U-i w>' S > 3a 0 C-r1 u L .i-r1 C O U li O O raOCU :i CTU C %400E C $4 r- Cl 0 U C r+ L L U :, C Cl-r1 G.-t O i:- O Ul t,-4C0 C•A :.4 ;t LL G -AC U :+ y L-i 11 F to . L .:+-A G U L 1.1 O U r' U to L to U la H c-^- y-A :1 E+ H Uri C) )4 O L >>«r' U ULI J O U U -:J C1 Q 1► > U E r, C LLuu t3 4.1 O U >vA .•> U SJ a-0 41 E .-i C-0 U m k C.4 U C E H O U =1M-4L0 44 CC) to.CU0 -A -Acu-A H a U O pro cl 0 0U EH E C: 0 > 004 .0 y C a L C toU .v r-1"0 ;4 E C Uta30C 00 C U0 0t.1- c3-A C) C3 < W -A O U 44 ca-A O -C-A L 0 C to U E t >'0.fC U L-A U > z U 03 44 C L 0 .e.. z -.d :l eA U U 0 :.1 -444 C)r4 O -A C C) U O w U=-1 :d > U :aU aUEa C LO CC-..C. U U v c3 to c3-A 1-1-A 0 0 U A 0 J +1 O O U ra 0 ti4 C u G C2 4J C a O m-0.0 c a C-CL H 0 e-1 M U b C1 0 0 :J 14 O G y r. L U W L > U C--A Cl > C U Cs-S3.c: 0. ra-•-1 V. : H 0 M C a'44 = C 0 w = E C) t; 0 to O U >% U .4-rtE300-4 U ¢ 0 .1 ALO U Z Ea Htn u O S Z .0C n �. OU"S"E u c:a r1 .a u [7 H IV-8 �1 c� OURS' 140 6-5 E• cu Iv-8 44 0 m u :+ r4G - 00-00 •ri .+ J O U4i it O J 1r 3-F- CL = Cf N C r--t r' O t^-rl-O z G r 1C :J 00 .^,,.1 :J L O'D Cr > U D k r- 0 C: 'O un u .'"3-ri 3=-O 3s O 1r C--- -7 G-ri ri m rl L:J U J r-1 O O m $+ O O t $.1 is C = n ---D G J 44 ts-M O O r O a a3 0 J G-ri O O O.0 0.= G O U-A 44 m ri a O 00 E1 U "J i=. 043 O »ri rn u34mC uur-ici O x E }i\r-1-A r-i sJ .O 0 ai 3s >% H u > U m.0 rZ4 ; m u z cn to CI J H r-i L= p a3 013 93 0 U G'C-A m u a OU ur-4 > O 'o to -A-r1 U U J---m >%C3 - 3-1 -ri C J u G m O G* c U O 43 s7 P w G a O.G Ou to t4 C $4 O J N J O 34 cV z 3.+ 0r4J-:30m430 O O 0 mUJ O [] 'C':-1 r4 C G G o =-A G J 44 1 J H A >U;4 U a-rl U O= d c O >> u 3+ 0 >+ 1 1-1 s~ U tO$4 -ri U -.i O L -A 0 :$.0 4* W .a O CS > O L U 0 G r-i 0'O U Ei d4JO= JPk0p0 E 0 a U G O 00 J-.-i C) U.G-r3 J L•A O -0 a O E4xc) 0m0-m4J3rtCG34-3 u Fs „G OJ r i J•ri d O41 ui • G 1 4l R3 O t ,c-a -rl 44 J 0-r3 O U r 4 - O'D 4i O O t :J-rd m O 3.3 eg r_ C) W O +i O J 0 >,r-i O C) U 0 J CJ C P 3+ E C-4-13 J "0 a. 0 4J P Y.r'. U.�4-� J r $. 4i to to m 0 ra r�-1 O w 4300 0ORn w3+ D -O JCaCJ si 'J C to= ci.G.-+=r-i O O O " p 'D O P-A Cl to 3r :3 9 1\ "4.34J„G41 to P. u u J ^ GHJJ v CS 0 0 C:lJ m --+O m.= C G U r-i-.i G 2 Z > J>r m rl't3 0 •J .r.,r-i O O C) CCS O J 0 H 'DOOm m OO tt) CO. F- u Um '0 0ric G m m -ri O G-A >, .0 C)J Q � 'D 4Wa -F. 0e4 O 42 O J 0.C) "r.' r-lX-ri ma 4114 U �Q •ri j:.+ C)r i •ri C) O E.0 J .0 4.1 u. O 44 44 44 r-1 04.) 010 O m 3-+'D G m 0 cn OJ J 0 -0cifm0 41= 0 —1- W G 04 t'5 4 O O >4 Si U U-ri SJ U C E4 d 3s C) = G 3.1^-3 lv >% -A 0 c; a,-:$34 a,-:$ J u .O vi EO-4 C)�. t m-A O QJ to• 4 Al G3 m L 0.0 k r-1 P G rt c. 2 3;-A -O J to N J G•- J x : 44 C O C) O z-A O v Cr-1GG O0 0J0000•+4 O m -;3H.0 O 000 u0 : u U CUJrlri> -aO (it toZ cs En A to to•r4 h m M-A m Y- CJ O rl O-ri r» G m O x t 7 C) G.J 0 m :J G 3:7 :41-4-0 u r, G J H ri E - 0 H U0IC:";:T0G340 J Clz >^ on. 0 OJG O :c. 44 U J G M$4 Cl 0. t>:C-1 J\»4 N Cl -14 G to G G �. O > m b m .t- m M 34 u - ai-ri m 1C H $+ >. 0-0 G 'D G --r--1 O r m x >%F- U C) E U E+ ClJCct3+ r-%:g3a G UJ Or-{.'{E. -ri OJCi.O .0GU 034 OO a `U0r-s G34 m Sir H GmU :3 Z.0 c3 U cc v 3+ 0 14-ri O '0 0 O J O O 43 J O .GOOF- 03+ OU S4 :2: U G.. Onto J > r-1 0 U w C.c m G m t --J tli-� C) F-3 J U J» O O 00 -ri m.G J G C >00 to 0 -- r-i E m to J < C4 J C C)r 4-A 0 34.= 4334 --O Jt. •-C. 0 Mr-4 3-s W UJ3:Gw-OO C7JC2 C) '0 C? C: !> 134a9- H um E. u*0 Ott 0 v a- 0 xU)4.3 SJ OJ a 0 0 O Z J 0 J 44 >, G O-" r-i C) E J 0 -A 0 G m > U 14 OF-.) m 0 0 O C U J r-1 $4 O m >..v: > C) i:.J•.i U $4 31 $ --C CO 3•+14 J r' J t"::: .O v E U ca b8 0.tC-A Si C CIJ G G >,7En E-4 0 O u m D G C) U 3-+4i C) J D s.) .i O- 1 r-1 ri',D 0 P C) m 0 H OJ CU73-4GD LU'D OO Jr-4C1Jm CS P .O >- 3•+ S: 03+r+ 00 a 0 34 O r-C-n m.0 GC3m > uCS H -4 OX O-ri•ri C >-ri O J G-ri•ri ' O 0 r JCS 0 .''..0 0 U! F+UH u E E r-< E .�- .a. J e C-+ 0 m G to E-4 m to 00 E-4 :4-rl .~- m U 3�7 cri U U Ji �► 4 O' .`� J Iv-4 0 U—1 Do 3.1 i ra u ri :J u 0 >r s:: 0.01 o r '7 01 0 r- 10 10 m m 0 U -rt rd @ O '0 e3�4 a r+ � ce, cn u -a,a 9= epi H H e3 E-4 to O UL0 N 0 o c 0 U =3 c r-1 .'12ti4 t=a �-1W W O A Cl C4 0 43 E-4 C O a w O O CJ U CU .. r bGW � - 0 41 W-r1 EW o W Gr Q x L-1 H ,ri - L fj -w-o US '�,cr--1 cz k H ':7 i+ U rl >4 3 4.3 4t t;4 G G' A4 FO+ m-4 0 3co 4 O O Wei 1- 41 O O m rW m q Z H rt r-1 U' Cl 11 H u > m U 71 �ri U 41 F+ a .c Q U 4J �. a: eJ-o G-0 li Y ti� �JGIR43 � o s:: :J r-4.M r- mZ O U c =_J 4J H O U if. fob G J 0 U. < +1 :4 Z U :J � 1 O U U] c--,I E-+ G.Fa - _ 2 O SJ d U CJ O ►] U A oo;<s.8 Iv-10 SECTION V DETENMO_Z FACILITY LOCAT?02: OPTIONS INTRODUCTION H� AJoc U o L4 :J.4-0 .: O U ^JtJ H CU1rtou > a c-+ m 1 1 G Cr U J O U. <'r+ r4 U -W � 1 @J U En E-1 Em40.H Z O L cu >�-.� w a OU.z 1< IV-10 SECTION V DETENtIOIN FACILITY LOCATION, OPTIONS IN'TRODU'CTION To test the differences of locating the proposed detention facility in the Civic Center or outside of the Civic Center, assumptions were made on the size of the building. Since this analysis is preceding decisions on capacity, occupancy and design, a hypothetical building size was developeil for use in the evaluation. It was assumed that the Detention. Facility would have a capacity between 300 and 400 beds. A mid-point capacity of 350 beds was selected and multiplied by an estimated 275 net square feet per bed. This allocation was derived from other recently completed programs and modified to reflect this scale. This resulted in an estimated need for 96,250 net square feet. This net area was then converted to gross building area by application of a percentage efficiency factor. It was assumed that a structure in the Civic Center could have more floors in order to conserve land area. Development of a structure of four to six stories would reduce the necessary site area but would reduce the efficiency of the building (i.e. , require more gross area for the.same assignable area to accommodate mechani- cal equipment). Discussions with the project architect indicated a desire to not exceed three floors in tha Civic Center in response to community opposition to taller buildings. It was, therefore, assumed that this analysis should be based on a three- story structure at 65% efficiency. For the outside location, where available land is in greater abundance, the project archi- tect has suggested. a maximum of two stories. This would also be estimated at 651'. efficiency. In Table V-1, the result of the net-to-gross conversion is shorn. The total gross building area uas divided into two and three floors to identify the building coverage or footprint for each location. Also shown in the table are parking requirements related to each location and the estimated land coverages. Parking requirements were estimated on a ratio basis using pre- vious experience as a guide. This ratio of one stall per 3.5 beds was used for the Civic Center location. For the outside location, the ratio of one stall per 3.0 beds was used.* This difference is to compensate for the fact that the outside location would involve additional trips by auto that would other- wise be accomplished on foot. For surface parking 350 square feet were allocated to each stall. Thus, Table V-1 Drovides two sets of hypothetical planning numbers that serve as the basis for comparison of the two locations. \ *See Handboo k on Jail Archl-Lecture, National Sheriff's Association, 19757— V-1 00269 TABLE V-1 HYPOTHETICAL PJAINNING ;tEQUIR?.'��*TTS Dt.TE!`iIO:: FACILITY LOCATION: A:TALYSIS CIVIC CENTER OUTSIDE Number of Floors 3 2 Bed Capacity 350 - 350 Total Net Area (net s.f.) 96,250 96,250 Total Building Area (gross s.f.) 148,000 148,000 Ground Floor (gress s.f.) 50,000 74,000 Area Above Ground (gross s.f.) 98,000 74,000 Parking Stalls 100 117 Parking Area (s.f.) 35,000 41,000 Ground Coverage Building ° 50,000 74,000 Parking 35,000 41.000 85,000 s.f. 115,00as.f. 1.95 acres 2.6 acres Site Requirements - Building Coverage = 3A 35% 143,000 s.f. 211,000 s_f. 3.3 acres 4.8 acres V-2 00270 FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS an The main detention faci�ire criminal jus-ice system, itfor Contra Csta is obviouslyprovides integral part of the en a service to law enforcement as a booking, screening, and deten- tion center and to the courts for detention of persons held in rttc}'n[IS. n nti=n tri '� r V-2 00270 FOCTIO\AL CONSIDER4TI0\S The main detention facility for Contra Costa is obviously an integral part of the entire criminal justice system. It provides a service to law enforcement as a booking, screening, and deten- tion center and to the courts for detention of persons held in custody pending trial. Consequently, the operation of the criminal justice system can be significantly affected by the location of the detention facility. At present, all interrelated components of-the system are located near one another in the Civic Center. Even given this juxta- position relationship, problems exist due to inadequate facilities rather than the jail and courts and within the Courthouse. Existing facilities do not provide for secure linkages between detention and courts or secure circulation within the court space itself. Construction of the proposed detention facility in the Civic Center would have the advantage of maintaining this basic juxta- position to the existing courts. A secure linkage between these two components could presumably be provided as a solution to one current problem (i.e. , movement between detention and courts). Proper prisoner movement within the Courchouse is a separate problem which may not be possible or feasible to solve in the existing building. Solutions to the latter problem, Courthouse prisoner flows, could involve the provision of court space u ithin the detention facility itself, thereby eliminating or minimizing custody traffic between buildings, or construction of additional court space in a separate building that has been properly designed for the in- custody criminal caseload. This new court building would presum- ably be properly linked to the detention facility. These solutions essentially continue the concentration of the Superior Court and related agencies in the Civic Center. The court utilization efficiencies that are possible in a Superior Court of this size are enhanced. Personnel of court-related agencies requiring daily or periodic access to the detention facility can continue to make these trips as pedestrians. The functional implications for the tiuricipal Court of a civic center location are in contrast to those of the Superior Court. The Zit. Diablo Judicial District covers a large geographical area with headquarters in Concord and a branch court in Martinez. This separation is reviewed as a problem by the Court, and combined with its space shortages in both locations, lead to a strong desire to consolidate in a single location. There is, of course, a significant need to have this location adjacent to the detention facility to minimize transportation of prisoners. The problem is that historically both Concord and Martinez have made municipal courts and representatives of the Court have speculated that Concord would not easily= relinquish this service in favor of a consolidation of the Mr. Diablo District in the Martinez Civic Center. V-3 00271 ke From the perspective of the many lam enforcement agencies serving Contra Costa County and its municipalities, the Martinez area is relatively central to the County as a whole. However, the Civic Center area is a relatively distant sector of the Martinez area, in terms of vehicular access and travel time for lawr enforce- ment personnel booking persons into the County Detention Facility. Access is essentially over narrow city streets for a distance of three miles after leaving the freeways serving the Martinez area. The Civic Center has been the historic location of the County Jail and has demonstrated that booking for law enforcement agencies can be handled without great inconvenience or time loss. From a pragmatic point of vier, the difference in distance of travel (about five miles) is rather insignificant once a vehicle is in operation. Travel distance from the Richmond area to both locations is about the same. It is, therefore, suggested that the time/distance differential and the degree of convenience offered by the outside location is not reason enough to compel selection of the outside location. However, it has been speculated that use of the outside location, near the interchange of Highways 4 and 680, could achieve the concurrence of both 'Martinez and Concord as a consolidation location for the Municipal Court. Even if this locatior, were annexed by Martinez, it is about midway between the two municipalities and readily accessible by auto. There would be benefits to both communities, due to the efficiencies of consoli- dation and the location of the entire Court adjacent to the detention facility, as well as the fact that a long-range accom- modation of the Court could be accomplished. Generally similar benefits are applicable to other outside sites. The outside location for the detention facility would cause a significant transportation problem if the Superior Court and related agencies remained in their present Civic Center location. All detained persons attending Superior Court sessions *could have to be bussed from the outlying detention center. In addition, court-related agency personnel (e.g. , Public Defender) would be required to drive to the detention facility rather than walk the distance in the Civic Center. The transportation_ problem could be mitigated by providing court space with the detention facility at the outside location. A small number of courts could be provided to handle the high volume activities of the Superior Court (e.g. , arraignments and motions) , as has been suggested for the Civic Center location. While this would significantly reduce transportation of prisoners, court and court-related versonnel would still have to travel. It would be possible to include space for branch offices to eliminate the transportation problem, but small branches are generally opposed by the Court and related agencies due to operational inefficiencies. Tn general, the concept of providing court spaces at a remote location array from the :.lain body oL the Court has been strongly viewed by the Superior Court as an option to be avoided. 002'72 V-4 r: COM-P-ARATIVE COST CO\SIDER TIO;:S Capital Costs Capital costs required for implementing the detention facility alone in either of the two locations, Civic Center or outside location, were considered for the purpose of assessing the ' economic impact of the two options. Costs were estimated on the basis of the following: Construction: Per Turner Construction Company, Los Angeles, no significant difference in unit costs between locations is anticipated so long as the nature of the structure planned on either location is similar. However, since there are no data on the soil condition of the outside location, the cost differential, if any, for that aspect of the construction is unknown. Site In addition to on-site and off-site improvements Improvements: common to both location, an adjustment factor of 70% was applied to make the rat: land status of the outside location comparative with the developed physical status of the Civic Center. Parking: Parking requirements were assessed based on provision of surface parking at both locations. Replacement cost for existing parking space loss (about 200 stalls) was based on surface parking. Land: Land values were based on actual County costs experienced over recent years. Land acquisition costs at an outside location were based on an estimated $0.57 per sq. ft. ; Civic Center land at $7.62 per sq. ft. Both estimates are exclusive of relocation and administrative costs. Not included in the schedule of comparative estimates of capital costs are Indirect Capital Costs: Professional fees, Testing, Inspection and Financing Charges. 00273 V-5 .1 I o 'a Inspection and rinancang Lharges. 00273 V-5 s , main cli -4 a+n cv V u Co C> M �' 1 cv •off 4" O c. ,� s-1 O- e-1� s Crf cn O ,0 0 Q O O p O d co tO+ O to to ct < U ' 064' OO O M v H E+ u O p cn 14 %0 N 0 � # U co U +.3 cT �O 02 O� cJ co O ?O uCIJ V ata to H > u oa a a o C) a zi u O G? O t3 u�s co cn O tai 0 `W U 1-4 c.y E. u r-4 f..+ "O . �~ u C►'fir '� �� O^ U !G Oz .`fir 41L. h �+ SJ U '+� Oto O , { .-i h O ¢s :� _ 01-4 o 41 LcT^ v'0 41 u 0. .. , * WC -# U x� �s>'s,i Ur7C} 1 mu Com! t u q 44 u C" a 44 � -,4 > 0 c10 � Om u 0 •-� u co LN u a ^ r o k H O tit m E4 41 G) m :1 o c � n u u v c� cn o C) c (! 274 V-6 v i 3 R Operating Costs It is believed that the operation of a detention facility in either location would not differ to an, measurable amount. Presumably capacities, services, and programs would be the same and consequently staffing would be identical. The project architects and their consulting engineers have advised that physical plant operations are expected to be essentially the sane in both cases. There would be an operational difference between the two locations in terms of transportation costs. As indicated earlier, the civic center location would continue to permit pedestrian-node communication between detention and courts and related. Moving detention alone to the outside location would require vehicular movement between the courts and related agencies in the civic center and the outside location for prisoners, attorneys, probation, etc. For prisoner transportation., it was estimated that as many as four round-trips per day could be required. This would involve two deputies and one bus. Amortizing the bus over ten years, combined with annual salaries of $15,000 plus mileage costs, it is estimated that about $50,000/annum would be expended. It was found that about 1400-1500 round trips per year are made by court-related personnel to the detention facility- The additional travel time lost plus mileage ($0.15/mile) dere calculated to be equal to about $10.00 per trip or $15,000 per annum. The total, therefore, for additional County transportation costs related to building the detention facility at the outside location is estimated to be $55,000/annum or $1.3 million over a twenty-year period (current dollars) . SU`i4A?Y OF CO\CLUSIONS 1. Use of the Civic Center location for the detention facility would essentially dictate continuation of the bifurcated operation of the lit. Diablo Municipal Court unless the City of Concord could bs persuaded to relinquish- court departments currently located in Concord. Use of the outside location could provide a basis of compromise between the two municipalities- 2. Estimation of capital expenditure requirements were predicated on construction of the hypothetical building program; therefore, it should not be construed to be a total budget, but siMply a means of comparison. The estimates of development costs indicate that it is marginally less expensive to build at the outside location, assuming utilization of County owned land. Selection of az outside site requiring acquisition by the County would effectively negate the marginal cost advantage. OU,�'J� V-7 1 � I I j Although it is generally more costly to build in a downtown area due to increased land costs, (total site requirements estimated at one million dollars in Civic Center) the County already owns the majority of the site requirement in the Civic Center, therefore, only idd,rinnni Px-nPndi rnrPs -required to complete site u.11_a_, LU- l.sLy vL L v_u_vlu a.vulu P_.L.J C:U!_u LU Lellnquisc_1 court departments currently located in Concord. Use of the outside location could provide a basis of compromise between the two municipalities_ 2. Estimation of capital expenditure requirements were predicated on construction of the hypothetical building • program; therefore, it should not be construed to be a total budget, but sin ply a means of comparison. The estimates of development costs indicate that it is marginally less expensive to build at the outside location, assu-ni-Ing utilization of County owned land. Selection of az outside site requiring acquisition by the County would effectively negate the marginal cost advantage. V-7 a i y Although it is generally more costly to build in a downtown area due to increased land costs, (total site ! requirements estimated at one million dollars in Civic Center) the County already owns the majority of the site requirement in the Civic Center, therefore, only additional expenditures required to complete site acquisition have been assessed. The County has estimated acquisition of remaining parcels will cost approximately $300,000. In addition, the Civic Center land used for the detention facility could eliminate existing parking areas that would then have to be replaced; it has been presumed, that approximately 200 parking stalls could require replacement. . 3. Use of the Civic Center location would provide for direct access between_ the proposed detention facility and all existing Superior Court and related justice agencies and facilities. It would be functionally impractical to contemplate use of the outside location for the detention facility unless the Superior Court and related agencies were relocated in toto. Simply in transportation impacts, the outside location today would cause an additional estimated cost to the County of $65,000 per annum. Over a twenty-year planning period, additional transportation costs, in current - dollars, are estimated to be $1.3 million. i V-8 O02'7s SECTION VI MASTER PLAT W-111IFT_ChTTONS INTRODUCTION As is demonstrated by the rough estimates of space requirements for centralized County Government functions, needs have already exceeded available resources. Future growth will continue to require additional space that is provided in the content of a comprehensive facilities plan. The implications of the preceding section are that the detention - facility could be properly accommodated in either location, but that selection of one must essentially be a long-term com- mittment of the County to a consolidated justice center in that same location, he construction of the detention facility in a location without this committment to the courts would be function- ally improper. It is the purpose here to consider the possible combinations that suggest basic alternative planning concepts. Four such alternatives have been identified and explored: I. Continue the present pattern and locate all justice and general government facilities in the Civic Center. II. Create an entirely new government center for justice and general government facilities at an outside location III. Create a new justice center at an outside location, allov:ing general government facilities to expand in the Civic Center. IV. Expand justice facilities in the Civic Center and relocate general government activities to an outside location. In addition to these basic alternatives, other possibilities were identified but not developed. 1. That alternative IV above, be modified to reflect a partial relocation of general government facilities to an outside location. For eaa=le, Health could remain in its present quarters. assuming they were expanded, and be split from other general government functions_ An option of this sort or one involving other potential splits are subjects of a far more extensive and detailed study than is possible here. Careful evaluation would be required of the operational impacts resulting from such a split. 00217 VI-1 �s 2. That the proposed detention facility be split into a smaller pre-trial facility servicing the courts in tate Civic Center plus a larger pre-trial facility at an outside location for longer term stays. This has been done in other jurisdictions where detained populations are quite large and land adjacent to the courts is too limited to accommodate the full program. It introduces a new transportation activity plus the costs of operating two facilities. For Contra Costa, it suggests an in- terim measure but is felt to not be appropriate for a long-term permanent solution. The method used to explore master plan concepts has relied on the data that were available and could be rapidly assembled. The fact that these data are applied consistently overshadows the inaccur- acies undoubtably contained in the data base. The method has con- sistently assumed in all four alternatives that all County-owned buildings in this Civic Center could continue to be available for use through -the planning period with the exception of the modular structures and maintenance yard facilities located at the rear of the Administration Building, and the existing County Jail structure. The land occupied by the modular buildings and yard facilities would thus be ava=ilable for parking or new buildings. I-LASTER PLAN: ALTEPNATIVES The following sections suggest a series of =ajor actions that would be required to implement the alternative plans. As indi- cated earlier, space shortages exist in all functional categories. in.plyino that several major construction projects would be immediately warranced. The attempt has been made here, to stage these actions over time in a conceptual fashion, rather than simply state that all capital projects would commence immediately. As a result, space shortages in owned buildings would continue to exist for various periods of time but would be mitigated by continuation of the leased space. For each alternative developed, the magnitude of each action suggested has been quantified in terms of building size and estimated costs. Cost estimates are state in current dollars and have not been escalated to reflect possible costs at the time of construction. Unit costs of $90/sq. ft. for detention, $70/sq. ft. for court space, and $50/sq. ft. for general government space were used. Structured parking was estimated at $12/sq. ft. and surface at $1.75/sq, ft. Land values were assigned on the basis of recent county experience. Site development costs were allo- cated at the race of $1.50/sq. ft. of land plus 50% site prepara- tion aur-Mentation fer the outside location and for additional land required in the Civic Center. Again, it must be noted that the cost estimates provided must not be construed to be complete budgets, but are prodded as com?arative tools valid only in relationship to the others. VI-2 00278 Shown as an integral to certain alternatives mould be the availability of one or more Civic Center properties for unspeci- fied purposes or disposal on the open market. Presumably revenue received would partially off-set capital improvement expenditures. No attempt has been made to assign a ma- ket value to existing Civic Center buildings. Alternative I Continue current pattern of County Government in Civic Center. Advantages: 1. Builds upon the status quo with no break from the historic county seat; complies with 1953 master plan. 2. Capitalizes on existing facility resources. 3. Maintains relationships of components of criminal justice system. 4. Vould continue and expand an economic generator in P:a=tinez. 5. Would pe—mit high value use of land already acquired by the County. Disadvantages: 1. Requires large county development in downtown 'riartinez that could be viewed as out of scale; additional land for future buildings and parking. before and after the year 2000, would ir.pact surrounding commercial/resi- dential areas outside the present Civic Center boundaries. 2. Could generate traf=ic in excess of the capacity of the existing streets. 3. Would face opposition by the Martinez community and constraints imposed by ,iartinez City Council policy established in 1973. 4. Vould require a significant expenditure for structured parking or for acquisition of additional land for surface parking. 5. Would dare it difficult, politically, to consolidate the municipal court in one locacioz. CZ-3 rt r: to 34 Q rs t>r4 9s Ski 00 d d et)t+y 7'.J' d N h Q to N C) w Q�J D rit�0 to EHa 41 O cV'f ...` or to h Ln � to\D ICV !`�r� N cl qty LM C :+ rr3 vs to. yr h u)- Fr 3t - O U V� 1+ 34 3: 34 $+ u P It 34 3+ C) C) C) o Cl U u C) C) o z d.) V V 4i 47 y 1J 43 43 ;.1 H C) G 0 G Ci C) a C) C3 C) p C3 0 V U V U U C3 V C1 C,9 H V U U U U U U U U U U Q 44 -ri -ri rt -rt --d -r3 ---i-rt -A W a > > > > > > > >> > H -r4 > -rt -r1 -rt 44 -r3 -r3 -r3 -r-1-rt -r3 0 U 0 v ca v v to z G U 3+ to C7 o co co co CC) co Q C) C O+ m CA a% C% O O H rl r4 rt r4 r-i ICV N 41 . r-- M "c-t A q CR A A A cc > E-+ 54 w C3. O C3 r3,} y H O` C3 ?` «ca . Ci 41 a C) S Er- 0012 ))En rz. O G Uc7 > u 4 cc u 4) d P ccn ca u o --4 tz-4 u a 103a O ° t.. 34 O o U P O 0 d 0 to 440 u 0---t y to =1 Q 44 Ci Q C2 - .0 0 O - m y In to z 0 - Q 43 Cl m trt d ca G l: o V >%CO byd It - -Ol Q zi L-1 C) u to Q a-I lz r_Q cl--i ."3, N 00 C r-3 a m U ex3"'-. m Q r=a -ri r 4-r3 - :;h U 3+d G P m X o V O-to -4 -14 cr3 a- u 3 :s - r E U C) -A P O Zz -.a a PC! -01 ca is h C •• 4) u -rt O W U t'u.-i U --4 a+ U N 31*0-2 U t H m >I r4 O cc o L'- Ci e: C)trt 7 h U L7 0 rC)- U � 4 E+ r-]Q �=4 K1 :a M O $-#%D 34 >h P -0 U t i o to at C d U4 - C C) U to -U CEJ ton U Cj tr) 34 to co --4 .) oh o C!3a $ CJ C tc -r3 -_U G o to -rt :1 U Z4 0 5.-.- b C3 r4 i_. G:r,-+ o -rt d d t�3 3 t u v[+ LJ U U4 i-. to G,4 a W C to c u U sr C)tcn is u C) 9:m u w -r<tr: 43 z . -rd U 3.z -r+u u m-A r3 >. CJ z C r4 /a z 3a .s C U X 0� -A > 43 tJ la CL U C Q la U C O P Q X-ri c v C U C) Q 4.3 U Xd 00 ri :J UO C-1 C> V UCu tfYC 4U3sj N -O : U ndQ m 3a 373Q uQ ^w0 OO :i.00 G i I 0 o S05 � -rt G 'c3 --zj-O -Li - 5 N 'o-4 'C3 —. %3 --a C) �4i rr4,4 U 41 C3 ra% r-t C r4%n r-t h ri r-i --i r-i 1-1 P-3 q) i!3 > GC C L7> -A ON-.a r -rt L'1 -rt r-t •rl C,3 -rt r-1 -A ri E C) U C) U Ll 03-A la o :s o :3 C :3 U 3+ 34 'r3 is C L:CJ u U tC Co t l K3 q ro U U U U 07 -r3 C. ti - >: C W co r4 r-IG C: Cr3 ti L'1 J h q L", r-t�`.{ to r-I Q 00280 VI-4 r Alternative II Relocation of all justice and general goverment functions to a neer government center at an outside location. Advantages: 1. Provides a clean slate for the planning of a highly functional government center with adequate land for long-term growth. 2. Avoids negative impacts on the downtown Martinez area. 3. Provides building space in Martinez for consolidation of various public entities now scattered or displaced, for new public programs, or for sale to private interests for office space. 4. :doves County Government to a site more easily accessed from other parts of the County and closer to the center of population. 5. Provides the opportunity for all or most parking to be surface rather than structured. 6. Offers potential to consolidate municipal court in one location. Disadvantages: 1. Would require acquisition of a substantially large site or use of a site previously designated for other purposes. 2. Would necessitate acquisition of a site that could be annexed to the County Seat of :•iartinez or would require a change in the designation of the County Seat. 3, Would necessitate disposal of existing County properties in the Civic Center. 4. Would involve construction of a considerable quantity of building space in the new center to replace that which is disposed of in the Civic Center. 5. Would require slightly more parking than a civic center location. 6. Could delay the detention facility project and necessitate interim measures to improve current conditions. 00281 E-. m o a L1 O d proper Cies z)) L-ue uantity 4. .Touid involve co:�stxuc tion o e considerable q of building space in the neer center to replace that Center- Which is disposed of in the Civic Center. lightly more p3rl:ing than a civic S- tOu * ld require s center location. ect and * II �niresfacility to prrOove current 5. Could dela} the deteimprove necessitate ince-- conditions. 00281 m E-+ to CO $+ o a o� U o o 0 0 'T- L'I o 0 o er r CO ao H A O M n 0% O q � Cn C3, so Ln O� a Ln Cn Cn E+ 1--i !n!� c7 as r t�) c•) CO r) r-1 %D F y1 r •� UV v G Cl {_ z 4jE4 ). 0 o ra :J U :J 43 J .0 > jJ t7 ~ O O O O O O -A O O H O O O O O O U O O U O O H ¢ ¢ x � u o �+ a o o ar) Ln �� an o 0 o v C9 CO m O CO 00 00 CO O O O 2 0% rn rn G% 0% ON O+ O O O $.J H r-) r-r -4 r-r 1-1 r 4 r-r N h C\ Q; W . E-+ c: ra r~ c4 q ca ;-A N to C!) O V N• H P t r U r-1 N U d co CS A r_ ¢ a. CO s.. t4 Ss o 0)) to O 0 to c+) W %0 O o O u -a 1 0 1 O O ! N O U.r4 �.. SJ *. O V O al 0 u - 01 Ln Lt O - os O w :+O U 00 3+ O O O a U 044 y.t0 ^. - O Q - CJ U) O O a O O 4 U W It N-1 L) J r-r 0." 44 .'. N �O W U 03 ra 41 to z G to P -.r r� CC U -rt -r♦ 6 $4 8 r: :3 E :.l O O:3 ij O G .Z > O U O -4 Cr 3+o-e 13 O G h C-') -r{ 4? O -.i 5- GS U O,* X -0012 O L') !4 U C) P x � H U-r) .''-a Ln U sn 31 b O 0%0 74 E La P -r1 N :-A %a O 0 u 00 V V, w r- a c3 t� C S4 O Cil &)G; C°l 34 �q J 9::n -r{ 3+ J > r- U u•:.'1. -4 Cn U t!) N O U to U i+ O O 4 o'c ii,U) U to C;!! -rt C!) 31 Z C-.O +4 O :.C) cC 0 Q :J O&n -ri C) U Z -r:Z w U a Z J t:-! Y. G t" 44 U O - C'O " -LI G P C) c0 :40 i=i.-+ ►n 34 O O :4 O crl W V CJ C.)C) :o :.O o �o o r. oo E %0 c ZJ u A o :Z o m o to o to o tr,o r-f 14 c C') Er.0% U -0 a ur r- 0 O U CY O O Com- )• - - C) C) •.r - - to r. O O -ri E U•-+ -O - :. - Z) - -O - -000 :%3 -C O Z O -a- O CL r-) 4')-r4 a w U r-1%D r 4 .A%Z� r-+%:) r-f a ---i r7 C a r-4 c") r-1 C-) G- rl C) i) t) 0) > P -40%0% 4 cv -r-)C7 -A U1 r4.4 r4 A) E U -,4-4 -rr UI N al >1 N y 3a 6 C1 K) tJ C2 A W C1 A O 3+ a Sa �- 43 Fi U U C) p -A C3 a C7 � L to o r-1 CV C7 .Y vl O s` a7 Cr O ti � 40it yO ) 0��` 82 Alternative III Justice system functions moved to an outside location and General Government functions remaining in the Civic Center. Advantages: ' 1. Provides opportunity for a master planned justice center. 2.. Provides readily available office space for General Government, including reconversion of the Courthouse (originally Hall of Records) to office use. 3. Provides land for expansion of both functional groups with justice outside and not competing for land in the Civic Center. 4. Removes the justice functions, as a high-volume traffic and parking generator from the Civic Center and offers possibility of minimizing structured parking in the Civic Center. 5. Offers potential to consolidate the Municipal Court in one location. Disadvantages: 1. Requires a significant expenditure to replace court space discontinued in the Civic Center. 2, Will necessitate a minor amount of travel be ween locations and some parking augmentation. 3. Could require revision of the exisiting general plan and preparation of a completely new environmental impact report for the entire justice center; this would delay the detention facility project. 4. Delay of detention facility project would necessitate significant interim measures to improve present conditions. 00283 V:.-7 is,._..........:........_. H L7 W 34 O c3 v r+ W O O O O s t1 O -� N O �' Ln O 1 O.-t >Cs C� �; .-� %D C1 0s N tr1 cs � co o a.%D ce) O i-i O cn r- m -C1 r- h t7• "�' b'i hl Vr "I C) Ci Y. cl; c"1 v; r-1 c+� %n 1-4 a �+ 0 U� u u t+ $4 a u a 0 0 U 41 41 W li 43 o c ¢s u eGi C) p H H Ci Ci C) tJ U U U U U O U U Cl U H U ri ri rt -r! ri -A U U U -rt U U ri r—' O t 1 m to q m DS -rt -d -A to-r4 -A US > tl r: 4.1 J J z3 z 1 L > > > 1.1 > > 4.1 H > :j '-j "� 'j U U -A -rl o-1 ".3 r1 rl U H O O O O O O U U U 00 U O E-4 C Lam+ O O O Ln t7 to tri O O COj 0 co 00 co 00 c0 00 co O O Hri r4 r-i e 4 r 4 1-4 r4 Q N r H V) H a ca p cs A H H O U U U u 41 > 47 E ° -• us o`z' CS O N t� O 1 G O L1 > O r!i O .: U O U O O O 'Cl O U O rs O u - O 0 C3 O 34 34 O U cC1 i s W%0 Co to >sCo -`- - O G - U Ln O - 01 z.1.* R)CSS 44 :.t ri r-:�S 44 C1 G tt1 Cs C1 "4 e-i to i4 r- W U r- w wLj ba C3 . -r-I4 3.1G G UB 41q 0 41O p tU - J ti 2 U :3 -ri i7 3 t o+ -r► cc O U H It.to U to 34 0 O 0%0 p -'-1C`1 U t1 $4 r--a %0 %D cl G 00 U t3 14 C3 r- z.1 'C1 U G r4 C3- .±» C°J i-`- -U C- CC% U O O C 04V G G1 C'! K Ci co -0 O a .-t r.`- ci 41 O t=a U t-r s-1 b-3:4 ri o O o u i:., -r$T~ U" 44:4 -A tf) U En CS[. U L-4 G cn U - -O G c� C)t n tri to -4 tr_ ra Z CS 0 U cn U cn rt CJ a 4.1 Ln Ln Ln Ci? -rt-4 44 0 $+z U 44 Cl Z "4= V U G O%D zi G $4 ci CLO 54 a` > 44 $40 C4 U O a O :3 O 1-0 :+C1 :$a% O t:.t to 43O G Cl O O m O cn O En O 4Z .-4 O O. C=.`a G O O r- .? r- - - U O cn - G O O -ri -0 - ':S - -0 -' v - :3. 00 'U O -0 - '0 - -0 C"1 O m tr- e'-1 0 CO-rt 4-1 e 4 vo r♦co r-i -ti.1 -4%o r4%n -a cn O r- rt 't� 4-" U U G a U 0 U -4 ON -.4 C4 -.d Cn -ri Ln -H r4 -rt C7 GLS ..•+s7 -A L+ P 14 > $4 b1 CU :3 U U U U O G U :, U c U U C! U Uzi }t Ct ., b 0 CJO C3 GUG ztc U G . _ u th to r. co Q -r--4 .M-i --'U A O 0% U cn Qh 1 VI-8 Alternative ISI General Government functions moved to a new Administration Center in an outside location and create a Justice Center in the Civic Center. Advantages: ' 1. Would capitalize on use of existing court facilities. 2. Detention facility project could proceed on schedule. 3. Structured parking in Civic Center could be minimized or avoided. 4. Impacts of full-scale develonZlent in Civic Center could be minimized by partial use of outside location. Disadvantages: 1. Requires replacement of substantial existing office space in a new administrative complex. 2. Does not easily improve existing court facilities and necessitates significant remodeling costs to use existing Civic Center buildings for justice functions. 3. Could result in an over-supply of office space in the Civic Center not needed or usable by justice agencies. 4. Locational split should result in additional travel and parking augmentation. 5. Would make it difficult, politically, to consolidate the N'unicipal Court :Ln one location. 0048:) VI-9 t, co C 0 U r1 21 00 O s.'t 0 C\ 0 Ln O N 00 000 N O N r-4 b a0 to t"1 r 4 p C+ J til t-1 O C7 C12 en '"1 in 00 00 to O %0 M%0Cq t�Cn "t O M 0 M t!1 t Cil q t o ca I, �0 0ejV c 14 2) za 4J sJ :.J s.s H U U U U G ¢1 U U GU U G U 'O 'L1 'C7 - !moVi U u u U G -A 'rl G G M C3 G•ri W 0 -A -A -.d '4 W to -,t -.t a'rl -rl m P, ra > > > > 13 JJ > > L > '„>w 1.4 I > -ri .e-1 -A -A O =1 -r1 •4 O E-1 H U U U U C O U U OU UO (G� cs. I :a 0 C', cor-1 `T 00T o5 a oT aqT oT tr U 00 o zp � 0o r4 -4t1i o E04 n cQ q p q q E-t O q O "c-1 i O C3 U G r O J�.1 U r cn G r# rJ c w N r-I Iz v M -A o E 0c- G r� m i 1 � 1a o o > Q 0 r•< o O 4^1 'rn :-t -r1 Cl U C) *2 o :4 G o y o zJ u -G Tmoo �;4 -A to 44 Z c 10 w o It $440 o w ca -rz u G m ZJ-' 44 tai 0 W M 44 -3 :4 G -r1" rd 1.1 O •.4 ri Ti m r4 W' : a :0 O -c -r+ G-O Cr -a a a .J z -A r t cJ c d w J�-4 Ln $J u LI ;4 :J n #+ is q r O t0 - E-+ v G 0%0 :-J ca CS J.J L-4 u r v U 0. C7 to yCyt O.to -4 U2 cc X,0� SGt O C`l r1 a" W C:'.:. iA L'+ G i=+ S-• C) U-A O O O O�'J JC:G M L=. C G7 •rt m G w -r1 L-. Cj O to C V "Cr1 -A 0 O z 00 E m =O t :;S.l U O 0 in U Z t" •'2 -A 41 ✓2 -40 t64 99 :3 G O Go 0o 0C c? Ln -G o =3o a Ow E %0%0 A 0 w o U o c,." r-1 G-A J J G OL crY(JJ- O 0 - O - G O G m :.).-+ G O O O •rE "0 - 'O c'J ^v - :, In "O `D "C3 1.., —j - '0 G O '3. Czr-1 S-14 J.J 1-1.0 t ra en .4 r. 0-4 o n a.o a C• G :.J u •ra C. 4-4 4 CO 4 c.t -A- E00 � o rJ w Cr cJ m > cc 0 :3 :3 o :3 :, G u -A E a G G a G j :+ U U A U G U ,4 93 tJ G cis -3 E _ O :.r 00 c� r4 ((�)t� ))r{4 V ,,,�* V28"J r _ • C0:-!P-ARISON OF ALTERNATIVES The costs of concentrating all facilities either in the Civic Center or outside are shown to be nearly equivalent (Alternatives T aTle TT) 'rnQ a;0ni r;�.^r_tly hi Crt1 r �n-t of J r4 tZ .°a r+ o ct C E -A 0� O v o� 7 -4 C3r• q Q .`Ln O L7 :+ .J^CJ a �:,� L (O'er' F' C5 $40 O. N P. 4 UZ it X'b'O U VI .-t ^.t 0U V `� y� - � OOo' < O G) U C`-._, M L=. U L-+ .- G-4 4-a N �! O O p aZ u y' AU CD 1;3 �0 OO 0� < G. p4rE GO OO OO � 0 � La^O;1a tvf7�1+ COO � U J u - UWG) r4cO 5 G :l.aU O b acri O 'J � 3 : a -O Cn y 0 -4 O N N N M 1J 4` c O n U U U U C;;4 rZ 4 Wf3 Gi y F 4NN J %0 CV :2C 0 Cn , E UU2bs 11T-1 Q CO'MPyRISON OF ALT UTATIVES The costs of concentrati-n-- all facilities either in the Civic Center or outside are shoo-n to be nearly equivalent (Alternatives I and II). The significantly higher costs of structured parking irr the Civic Center are essentially balanced by the existence of o:.-ned building space in the Civic Center that would have to be replaced at the outside location. The comparative costs used to measure the relative values of the land in the two locations were derived from recent County land purchases in both areas. While they have been applied consistently, it is possible that future market conditions could alter the degree of difference as sho.m here. The implication is that the particular site used in this analysis to represent outside locations is large enough to accommodate the program, whereas full development of all available properties within the Civic Center zone would still necessitate an additional five acres in dm;ntown. he availability of five acres of downto:m property, the acceptance of Civic Center expansion by the City of Martinez, and the additional relocation and administrative costs are unknown. It has been assumed throughout this comparison that structured parking :could be required as, the Civic Center grows. It is believed that t:.e existence of other land uses around the Civic Center and the stated policy of the City of Martinez to protect those uses, force-- the County to increase the Civic Center parking density. Comparison of the two "concentrated" alternatives with the tv-0 "split" alternatives results in a developmental cost advantage for the split schemes (Alternatives III and IV) . The reasons for this are that in both cases only part of the parking requirement would likely be structured, with the re- mainder outside, and that most or all existing building space could continue to be used in both cases. Thus, the split schemes minimize the most costly aspects of the two concentrated schemes. It is fa=irly certain, however, that separation of the two basic functional components of County Government would be slightly more costly operationally. Even though daily interaction is assumed to be mini-nal, a communication system would have to be established, support services would be partially duplicated, and certain personnel would period- ically make trips to the other site. The quantitative effect of a split betc:een General Government functions and justice systems functions is unknown. It is kno,on, ho-.,ever, thaz physical separations along these and other functions lines are not unusual in County Government. VI-11 1121-1 In rapid fashion, basic master plan alternatives have been defined and compared because reasoned selection of a detention facility location should be in the context of comprehensive plan. As much as anything, this effort has demonstrated a need for a detailed master planning study to replace or modify the results and data contained in the 1963 plan. At this time, the Consultant must conclude that the 1903 plan is still in effect, in principle, and that it has been reaffirmed within the last year by the Board of Supervisors. It is also concluded that the City of Martinez will encourage continuation and expansion of County services and facilities in the downtown area. It has been shown, in this analysis, that constraints exist affecting the Civic Center imposed by the City. While it :could appear that the City opposes additional County develop- ment, City officials have expressed a desire to keep County Government in iiartinez. It =gill be necessary for the County ' and City to recognize and accept the facts of size and importance of a government center and reach an agreement on developmental policies. From a developmental cost perspective, it would be prudent to select a plan that takes advantage of the existing Civic Center buildings and the inexpensive parking available at an outside location. This suggests that -one of the split schemes (Alternatives III and IV) would be a better choice than concentrated schemes (Alternatives I and II) . Added to this must be the fact that do:rntoLrn Marcinzz is not developed for the high volumes of traffic that the concentrated schemes Mould generate. It is, therefore, suggested that growth in Cou_zty facilities take place in both the Civic Center and outside locations with all justice system functions to- gether. The questions of which of the two locations for all components of the justice system has no compelling objective answer. The conclusion must be drawn subjectively and is, therefore, subject to opposition from other points of vie4y. The Consultant suggests that the Civic Center location would be the better choice for the justice system, taken within the context of expected growth. possible future operational changes, and existing problems and circumstances. o Use of an. outside location would delay plans for the proposed detention facility due to EIR pre- paration and general plan amendments; any delay in replacement of existing jail facilities must be compensated for by an mediate and radical interim method of providing detention services; O`J288 VI-12 o The General Government fur_ctioas offer far more opportunities for optional grouping and splitting of operations than does the justice system; Alternative IV contains a degree of flexibility in the use of existing structures and development of an administration and operations campus at an outside location; o . It is felt that use of the outside location for a new consolidated justice center would tend to continue a pattern of concentration of justice functions (i.e. , detention and Superior Court) serving the entire County in one location. The Consultant is of the opirrion that Contra Costa County would be better served by decentralizing detention and judicial services in future years; continued use of the existing court space will permit time for an objective evaluation of decen- tralization before neer court space is built. 00289 VI-13 4 W a In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1476 In the Matter of Approval of Deferred Improvement Agreement for Subdivision ALS 34-76, Oakley area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Deferred Improvement Agreement with Tony Cutino, et al., permitting the deferment of construction of permanent improvements required as a condition of approval for Subdivision MS 34-76, Oakley area is APPROVED, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said Agreement. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Orig. Dept.: PW-LD Supervisors cc- Recorder (via P.W.) affixed this 28tWay of September . 19 76 Public Works Director Director of Planning J. R. OLSSON. Clerk County Assessor By P� , De" Clerk Dwight Meadows, et al. Rt. 1, Box 354-AA N. Pous Oakley, CA 94561 H-24 3/76 15m (J-1)290 t t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 ZL In the Matter of Releasing Deposit for Discovery Bay Blvd Road Acceptance, Byron Area (Ref: Subdivision 4205) On August 12, 1975 this Board ordered that the improvements be accepted as complete for the above named road acceptance for the purpose of establishing a beginning date for the one year performance guarantee period under the Road Improvement Agreement; and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director: The Board finds that the improvements have been maintained for one year after completion and acceptance against defective work and/or labor done or defective materials furnished in performing the Road Improvement Agreement, and that all deficiencies developing during this period have been corrected; and Pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406 and the Road Improvement Agreement, it is by the Board ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to refund to Discovery Bay Corporation the $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Road Improvement Agreement as evidenced by the Deposit Permit Detail Number, 115525 dated March 18, 1974. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig. Dept: —PW-LD - Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director-LD affixed this 28thday of September . 19 76 Discovery Bay Corporation P. 0. Box 85 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Byron, Ca 94514 ey Deputy Clerk 00291 t IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t In the Matter of Hearing on ) the Request of Robert H. Wilhelm September 28, 1976 .(2023—RZ) to Rezone Land in the Danville Area. Helen Ramos, Owner. ) This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommendation of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Robert H. Wilhelm (2023—RZ) to rezone property located at the end of a private drive on the southeast side of La Gonda '.*lay, said private drive being approximately 320—feet northeasterly of Danville Boulevard, Danville area, from Multiple Family Residential District-2 (M-2) to Single c Family Residential-15 (R-15); and Mr. Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning, having advised that the Planning Commission and Staff recommend approval * of the request since it is consistent with the General Plan for the area; and Mr. Bragdon having further advised that a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was filed for this proposal; and Mr. iilhelm having appeared and requested that the rezoning be approved; and Mr. F. L. Fray, representing five homeowners in the area, having expressed concern with respect to the access and proposed pavement widening for said development; and Mr. Wilhelm, in rebuttal, having noted that all residents in the area would benefit from an improved access road; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having expressed the opinion that a single family residential development would be preferable to a Multiple family development and would, therefore, recommend that the rezoning request be approved; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid is APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Ordinance No. 76-74 giving effect to the aforesaid rezoning is introduced, reading waived and October 12, 1976 is set for adoption of same. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. "fitness my hand and the Seal of cc: R. H. tlilhelm the Board of Supervisors affixed H. Ramos this 28th day of September, 1976 Director of Planning County Assessor td �OLSSON, CLERK 002U4 By ' Ron a Amdahl Deputy Clerk i , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Courtt�i tate of alifommla AS EX OFFICIO THE WINING BO OPRP RIVERVIEW FITLE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY September 28 1976 In the Matter of Bids for Performance of Fire Hazard Corrections and Abatement Work, Riverview Fire Protection District. This being the time fixed for the Board to receive bids for performance of fire hazard corrections and abatement work within the Riverview Fire Protection District for the period November 1, 1976 through October 31, 1977; bids were received from the following and read by the Clerk; Spilker Tree Service, Inc. J Spray Corporation; As ex officio the Governing Board of the Riverview Fire Protection District, IT IS ORDERED that said bids are REFERRED to Fire Chief Fred Golinveaux for review and report to the Board on October 5, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesoid. cc: Riverview Fire Protection Wfteumy hand and the Seal of the Board of ^' s District pe County Auditor-Controller affixed d+a 2 firrday of 197- County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ,/� _, Deputy Claris Mary cerai g c/7 H-24 3176 15m 00293 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of Encroachment Permit from the City of Walnut Creek to Construct Portions of the Proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain Within City-Owned Street Right of Way. Work Order 4389-925 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is authorized to apply for and execute an Encroachment Permit from the City of Walnut Creek to construct portions of the proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain within the City-owned right of way. The Walnut Boulevard Drain is proposed for construction under Title 1 of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orinagor: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Flood Control Planning Supervisors and Design affixed this28thday of September 19 Z J. R. OLSSON, Clerk cc: County administrator � � , Deputy Clerk B County Counsel y N. Pous Public Works Director UU29� H-24 3/76 ism in the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 119 76 In the Matter of Approval of County-State Holdover Agreement No. 27 Federal-Aid Secondary or Exchange Fund Project, Harsh Creek Road Bridge, Brentwood Area. Project No. 3971-4301-661-76 The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board APPROVE and the Chairman be AUTHORIZED to execute the County-State Holdover Agreement No. 27 between Contra Costa County�iand the State of California, for a proposed Federal-Aid Secondary project on the Marsh Creek Road Bridge; and The Public Works Director having reported that said agreement provides for the holdover of the available balances from the previous fiscal year apportionments of Federal-Aid Secondary and State Highway Matching funds totaling $267,544 and their combination into this one project. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department Supervisors Road Design Division affixed this 28t1ilay of September , 19 76 cc: Public Works Director County Administrator � J. R. QLSSQN, Clerk County Auditor-Controller r�z Deputy Clerk N. Pous H-24 3/76 15m 00295 i HOLDOVER COUNTY-STATE/AGREEMENT NO. 27 FEDERAL-AID SECONDARY OR EXCHANGE FUND PROJECT 04 CONTRA COSTA District County PROJECT NUMBER RS-A053(1.) riARSH CREEK ROAD BRIDGE THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate this 28th day of September , 19 76 , by and between the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA , a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY", and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "STATE". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, under the provisions of Title 23, United States Code and other Federal-aid Highway Acts, Federal funds are auth- orized to be appropriated for expenditure on a system of second- ary roads to be selected by the state highway departments in cooperation with local road officials, and such a system has been selected and Federal funds have been appropriated for expenditure thereon; and WHEREAS, as provided by the Secondary Highways Act of 1951 and Section 2200 et seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, Federal or Exchange funds and certain matching monies from the State High- way Fund have been apportioned to County for the construction of a Federal-aid Secondary or Exchange Dollar project selected by COUNTY in cooperation with STATE and described in Exhibit "A" hereto; and WHEREAS, under Federal Law, STATE is required to enter into an agreement with COUNTY relative to prosecution of the said project and maintenance of the completed work. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: Microfilmed witk.Eiocrd order DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 001295 ARTICLE I - Contract Administration 1. The project or projects described in Exhibit A, herein- after referred to as "the project" shall be constructed as pro- vided in this agreement. 2. Construction work: (a) FAS construction shall be performed by contract. STATE/� shall make final preparations for advertising, advertise and award the contract, and make payments to the contractor as the same become due. (b) Exchange Dollar Construction may be performed by con- tract or by day labor at the option of the COUNTY provided the competitive bidding requirements of State or local agency laws (whichever are applicable) are met. 3. The estimated cost of the project is as shown in Exhibit A hereto. A contract for an amount in excess of said estimate may be awarded and project expenditures may exceed said estimate if both STATE and COUNTY concur in the amount of and the necessity for the excess and sufficient money is available to finance same. 4. Administration of project: (a) If STATE is to administer the project, COUNTY shall deposit its share of the estimated cost as specified on Exhibit A with the STATE prior to the time funds are required to reimburse contractor. STATE will bill COUNTY for amount due immediately following Contract award or at option of COUNTY will submit monthly bills during the life of the Contract. Funds deposited prior to award which are in excess of requirements, will be immediately refunded to COUNTY. Should COUNTY fail to pay monies due STATE within 30 days of demand or within such other period as may be agreed between the parties hereto, STATE, acting through State Controller, shall withhold an equal amount from future apportionments due COUNTY from the Highway Users Tax Fund. (b) If COUNTY is to administer the project, STATE shall pay the proportionate Federal and State shares of the eligible participating costs within twenty (20) days of COUNTY'S submittal of acceptable monthly progress pay estimates for expenditures on an awarded project. DH-OLk 212 Rev. 7/75 -2- 00297 i (c) If the project is a cooperative project and includes work on a state highway, the project shall be the subject of a separate cooperative agreement between the State and County. within 3U days of demand or within such other period as may be agreed between the parties hereto, STATE, acting through State Controller, shall withhold an equal amount from future apportionments due COUNTY from the Highway Users Tax Fund. (b) If COUNTY is to administer the project, STATE shall pay the proportionate Federal and State shares of the eligible participating costs within twenty (20) days of COUNTY'S submittal of acceptable monthly progress pay estimates for expenditures on an awarded project. DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -2- 00297 rL 7- (c) If the project is a cooperative project and includes work on a state highway, the project shall be the subject of a separate cooperative agreement between the State and County. 5. STATE shall exercise general supervision over FAS work and may assume full and direct control over the project whenever STATE, in its sole discretion, shall determine that STATE'S respon- sibility to the United States so requires. 6. The Congress of the United States, the Legislature of the State of California, and the Governor of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain employment practices with respect to contract and other work financed with Federal or State funds. COUNTY shall insure that work performed under this agreement is done in conformance with the rules and regulations embodying such requirements where they are applicable. Any agreement or service contract entered into by COUNTY for the performance of work connected with the project shall incorporate Exhibit B attached hereto. 7. Ineligible Work: (a) On projects subject to Federal. regulations, all costs properly chargeable to the project but ruled ineligible under Federal-aid Highway Acts shall be paid by COUNTY and shall not be reimbursed by STATE. (b) On projects subject to only STATE regulations, the Exchange Dollar Funds may be used only for road purposes (to FAS standards) on or off the Federal-aid Secondary System. 8. After completion of all work under this agreement and after all costs are known, any unused COUNTY money shall be refunded. COUNTY monies deposited for preliminary engineering, construction engineering, and contract work shall be considered to be inter- changeable, and shortages of COUNTY money in one such category may be made up from unused COUNTY money in another category. When the amount of unused COUNTY money is substantial and there is an unusual delay in determining final costs, STATE shall upon request make an interim refund of the funds known to be in excess. 9. When requested by COUNTY, STATE shall arrange for payment of available project funds for royalties due a property owner for borrow material furnished to the contractor for the project under an agreement between the property owner and COUNTY which has been approved by STATE. A certified copy of such agreement must be filed with STATE. (, n DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -3- 00298 i 10. When the project includes work to be performed by a rail- road, the contract for such work shall be entered into by COUNTY or by STATE, at COUNTY's option. A contract entered into by COUNTY for such work must have the prior approval of STATE. In either event, COUNTY shall enter into an agreement with the rail- road providing for maintenance of the protective devices or other facilities installed under the service contract. At the request of COUNTY, STATE shall make direct payment of project funds to a railroad for work performed under a contract between COUNTY and the railroad. ARTICLE II - Rights of Way 1. Such rights of way as are necessary for the construction of the project shall be furnished by COUNTY, and no contract for the construction of the project or any portion thereof shall be awarded until the necessary rights of way have been secured. Prior to the advertising of the project COUNTY shall furnish STATE with evidence that necessary rights of way are available for construc- tion purposes or will be available by the time bids are opened. 2. The furnishing of rights of way as provided for herein includes in addition to all real property required for the improve- ment, free and clear of obstructions and encumbrances, the payment of damages to real property not actually taken but injuriously affected by the proposed improvement, COUNTY shall pay from its funds the cost acquiring rights of way and any costs which arise out of right of way litigation, or out of delays to the contractor because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights of way have not been made available to the con- tractor for the orderly prosecution of the work. 3. Whether or not Federal-aid is to be requested for right of way, should COUNTY, in acquiring right of way for FAS improve- ment, displace an individual, family, business, farm operation, or non-profit organization, relocation payments and services will be provided as set forth in Chapter 5 of Title 23, U. S. Code. The public will be adequately informed of the relocation payments and services which will be available and to the greatest extent practicable no person lawfully occupying real property shall be required to move from his dwelling or to move his business or farm operation without at least 90-days written notice from the COUNTY. COUNTY will provide the State with specific assurance, on each project, that no person will be displaced until comparable decent, safe and sanitary replacement housing is available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, and that COUNTY'S relocation program is realistic and is adequate to provide orderly, timely and efficient relocation of displaced persons for the project �U�99 DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -4- as provided in. FHFM 7-5. Exchange Dollar projects will comply with applicable State lavas. uL nuu-pLuLit; organization, relocation payments and services will be provided as set forth in Chapter 5 of Title 23, U. S. Code. The public will be adequately informed of the relocation payments and services which will be available and to the greatest extent practicable no person lawfully occupying real property shall be required to move from his dwelling or to move his business or farm operation without at least 90-days written notice from the COUNTY. COUNTY will provide the State with specific assurance, on each project, that no person will be displaced until comparable decent, safe and sanitary replacement housing is available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, and that COUNTY'S relocation program is realistic and is adequate to provide orderly, timely and efficient relocation of displaced persons for the project DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -4- 0OZ99 . - - . - as Drovided in FHFM, 7-5. Exchange Dollar projects will comply with applicable State laws. ARTICLE III - Engineering 1. "Preliminary engineering" as used herein includes all preliminary work related to the project, including but not re- stricted to preliminary surveys and reports, laboratory work, soil investigations, preparation of plans, designs, and adver- tising. "Construction engineering" as used herein includes actual inspection and supervision of construction work, construc- tion staking, laboratory and field testing, field reports and records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees engaged in such activities. 2. Preliminary and construction engineering costs included in the estimate contained in Exhibit A may be financed with proj- ect funds. The remainder of such costs shall be financed by COUNTY without reimbursement. When preliminary engineering or construction engineering costs incurred by COUNTY are to be financed with project funds, STATE shall reimburse COUNTY for services performed on the basis of the actual cost thereof to COUNTY, including compensation and expense of personnel working on the project, required materials, and automotive expense pro- vided, however, that COUNTY shall contribute its general admin- istrative and overhead expense. Payments for such services shall be made by STATE upon receipt of invoices from COUNTY prepared in such form and supported by such detail as may be prescribed by STATE. 3. Unless the parties shall otherwise agree in writing, COUNTY'S employees shall perform all engineering work. When preliminary or construction engineering for the project is per- formed by STATE, charges therefor shall include an assessment on direct labor costs in accordance with Section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual. The portion of such charges not financed with Federal funds or State-supplied matching funds or Erchange funds shall be paid from funds of COUNTY. ARTICLE IV - Miscellaneous Provisions 1. If Federal funds are used for this project, this agreement shall have no force or effect unless and until the project is approved by the United States, nor shall any of the Federal and State matching funds provided herein be expended unless and until the Federal Government has agreed and is obligated to reimburse STATE in full for the amount of Federal funds to be expended. DH--OLA 212 Rev. 3/76 -5- 00300 I 2. In the event that the project is programed on a stage construction basis, COUNTY shall complete the project to its final stage, with or without Federal aid, at such time as traffic or other conditions warrant and in a manner satisfactory to STATE. Should the work covered by this agreement involve a bridge with- out approaches, within a period of two (2) years after completion of the bridge,COUNTY shall cause such approaches to be constructed, with or without Federal aid, to design standards acceptable to STATE. 3. The cost of maintenance performed by COUNTY forces during any temporary suspension of the work may be charged to COUNTY funds in the project if such are available therefor. 4. (a) Neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or juris- diction delegated to COUNTY under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this agreement. (b) Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or juris- diction delegated to STATE under this agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, author- ity or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this agreement. 5. Auditors of STATE and the United States shall be given access to COUNTY'S books and records for the purpose of checking costs paid or to be paid by STATE hereunder. All project documents will be available for inspection by authorized State and FHWA personnel at any time during the project development and for a 3-year period after FHtu1 payment of final voucher, or a 4-year period from the date of final payment under the contract, whichever is longer. DH-OLA 212 Rev. 3/76 -6- 00301 1 1 1 6. Upon acceptance of the completed project by the awarding authority, or upon the contractor being relieved ofkthe duty of maintaining and protecting certain portions of the work, COUNTY shall maintain the project or such portions of the work in a man- ner satisfactory to STATE. If, within ninety days after receipt of notice from STATE that the project or any portion thereof is • not being properly maintained, COUNTY has not remedied the con- ditions complained of to STATE'S satisfaction; STATE may withhold the programming of further Federal-aid secondary projects of COUNTY until the project shall have been put in a condition of maintenance satisfactory to STATE. 7. The maintenance referred to in the preceding paragraph includes not only the preservation of the general physical features of the roadway, roadside, and surfacing, but also all safety and regulatory features, devices and appurtenances built into the project, and none of said safety features, devices and appurte- nances shall be removed, eliminated or decreased in effectiveness without the prior approval of STATE. Safety features to be main- tained include a roadside clear of utilities and other obstruc- tions or features which may be a hazard to a motorist who inadver- tently leaves the traveled way. No utility pole, tower, or other obstruction shall be placed within the right of way without the prior approval of governing body of the jurisdiction in which the project is located and, where clearances to the traveled way are less than those prescribed by STATE, without prior approval of STATE. ARTICLE V - Accommodation of Utilities Utility facilities (as defined in FHPM 144) may be accomo- dated on the right-of-way provided such use and occupancy of the highway right-of-way does not interfere with the free and safe flow of traffic or otherwise impair the highway or its scenic appearance; and provided a Use and Occupancy Agreement; setting f forth the terms under which the utility facility is to cross or t otherwise occupy the highway right-of-way, is executed by the I COUNTY and OWNER. The Use and Occupancy agreement setting forth the terms which under the utility facility is to cross or otherwise occupy the highway right-of-way must include the provisions set forth in Section F-111.04 of the LOCAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL published by the STATE, unless otherwise approved.by the STATE. 1 s - 00302 DH-OLA 212 Rev. 3/76 -7- s i ti ARTICLE VI - Condition of Acceptance As a condition of acceptance of the Federal-aid, State M-t-rhin ^ndlnr F-rh^nae monies provided for this project, COUNTY north the terms under which the utility facility is to crossor otherwise occupy the highway right-of-way, is executed'by the' COUNTY and OWNER. The Use and Occupancy agreement settingforth the terms which under the utility facility is to cross or otherwise occupy the highway right-of-way must include the provisions set forth in Section F-11.04 of the LOCAL ASSISTANCE MANUAL published ' by the STATE, unless otherwise approved.by the STATE. f 00 �rf t DH-OLA 212 Rev. 3/76 -?- v r i t ARTICLE VI - Condition of Acceptance As a condition of acceptance of the Federal-aid, State i Matching, and/or Exchange monies provided for this project, COUNTY will abide by the Federal and State policies and procedures per- taining to the Local Federal-aid Secondary Program. 00303 DR-ou 212 Rev. 7/75 --8- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Department of Transportation By 4n':'P , Arman, Boa d of upervisors HEINZ HECKEROTH Assistant Director, Highways By Chief, Office of L 61 Assistance Approval Recommended: ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON Clerk, Board of Supervisors By De:-mtSrDistrict Director of Transportation N. Pous Deputy Clerk 00304 DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -9- EXHIBIT A ARTICLE VII - Project Location and Description of Work Proposed: Location: On FAS Route A053, Marsh Creek Road, from 1000 feet east to 1000 feet west of Marsh Creek, approximately 1300 feet east of Deer Valley Road Net Length: 0.38 miles Description of Work: Replace structure and reconstruct approaches. pproaches. ARTICLE VIII - Proposed Project Funding: Cost: Preliminary Engineering by Department $ 3,000 • . Contract Items $ 247,000 Contingencies 12,000 Contract Total 259,000 Construction Engineering by County 28,000- TOTAL 8,000"TOTAL COST $ 290,000 Financing: Federal-aid Secondary Funds $ 178,362.00 State Highway Matching Funds $ 89,182.00 County Funds and such other funds as may become avail- able $ 22,456.00 ARTICLE IX: Special Covenants 1. Holdover Clauses (a) Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 2212 of the Streets and Highways Code, it is agreed between the parties hereto that the apportionments of Federal-aid Secondary/Exchange Dollar and State Highway Matching funds to Contfa Costa County for the two succesive fiscal years ending September 30, 1977, shall be combined for this project. Also to be combined in this project are any available balances from previous fiscal year apportionments. (b) The County will submit plans, specifications, estimates and the right-of-way certification by October 1, 1977. 00305 DH--OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -10- L. 04 r_y{ EXHIBIT B ARTICLE X - Nondiscrimination Provisions During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the "contractor") agrees as follows: 1. Compliance with Regulations: The contractor shall comply with the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in Federally- assisted programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 21, as they may be amended from time to time, (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. 2. Nondiscrimination: The contractor, with regard to the work performed by it during the contract, shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the Regulations, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the Regulations. 3. Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurements of Materials and Equipment: In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the contractor for work to be per- formed under a subcontract, including procurements of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the contractor of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the Regulations relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. 4. Information and Reports: The contractor shall provide all information and reports required by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto, and shall permit access tb its books, . records, accounts, other sources of information, and its facilities as may be determined by the State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such Regulations or directives. Where any information required of a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the State Highway Department, or the Federal Highway Administratic as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. • 5. Sanctions for Noncompliance: In the event of the contractor's .noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract the State Highway Department shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appro- priate, including, but not limited to: DH-OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -11- 0030 (a) withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or (b) cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, j in whole or in part. 11 1 „� a,, uiRy u . u. uJ LIZ_ .,LaL_ Highway Administration to be pertinentto ascertain compliance with Where any information required of such Regulations or directives. a contractor is in the exclusive possession of another who fails or refuses to furnish this information, the contractor shall so certify to the State Highway Department, or the Federal Highway Administratfc as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. S. Sanctions for Noncomvliance: In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination provisions of this contract the State Highway Department shall impose such contract sanctions as it or the Federal Highway Administration may determine to be appro- priate, including, but not limited to: DH-OLA 232 Rev. 7/75 -11- 00307 °' (a) withholding of payments to the contractor under the contract until the contractor complies, and/or (b) cancellation, termination or suspension of the contract, in whole or in part. 6. Incorporation of Provisions: The contractor shall include the provisions of Paragraphs 1 through 6 in every subcontract, ' including procurements of materials and leases of equipment, unless exempt by the Regulations, or directives issued pursuant thereto. The contractor shall take such action with respect to any sub- contract or procurement as the State Highway Department or the Federal Highway Administration may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions including sanctions of non-compliance: Provided, however; that, in the event a contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or supplier as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the State Highway Department to enter into such litigation to protect the in- terests of the State, and, in addition, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the t interests of the United States. DH-.OLA 212 Rev. 7/75 -12- 00308 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costo County, State of California September 28 I4 76 In the Matter of Tax Flyer The Board having this day considered distribution of a flyer with the 2976-1977 .fiscal year tax bills to provide infor- mation to taxpayers about distribution and uses of property tax monies; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that publication and distribution of said tax flyer is AUTHORIZED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date ofor"ald. Orig.- cc: County Administrator Witness my hand and the seat of the Board of County Auditor-Controller Supervisors _. County Assessor affixed thQ8th day of_September . 19 76 County Treasurer-Tax Collector Public Information Officer J. R. OLSSON, Cleric Do"Clerk Ieaxine Ni. N d 00309 H-24 3176 15m • • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Mallet of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the construction of the proposed walnut Boulevard Storm Drain and Outfall into Walnut Creek in Flood Control Zane 3B in the Walnut Creek area. W- n_ 41R9-g29 The Board as the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District hereby APPFiDVES AND ALMMRIZES the Chai ri lam to execute a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the County and the District for the construction of the proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain. The County proposes construction of the Walnut Boulevard Drain in the road right of way to be funded under Title 1 of the Public Yorks Bmpleyment Act of 1976. The agreement provides for the construction of the storm drain outfall into the Walnut Creek Channel by Flood Control District Zone 3B. PASSED BY ME BOAITM on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originator: Public Wor}-,s Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Flood Control Planning &Supervisors Design affixed this28th day of September , 1976 cc: Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County ur County Counsel Deputy Clerk N. Pous 00310 H-24 3/76 15m JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT (Walnut Boulevard Drain-FCZ 138) 1. PARTIES Effective SEP 2 8 1976 the County of Contra Costa, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "COUNTY," and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called "DISTRICT," pursuant to Government Code Section 6500 and following hereby MUTUALLY AGREE: 2. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The COUNTY through a federal grant under Title i of the Public Works Employ- ment Act of 1976 proposes to construct storm drain improvements in Walnut Boulevard and Bradley Court. The outfall for said storm drain improvements is the Walnut Creek channel at the westerly end of Bradley Court. The "DISTRICT" will construct the outfall structure into the Walnut Creek channel. The outfall structure is defined as the portion of the storm drain system between the westerly- end esterlyend of the Bradley Court right of way and the concrete channel lining. 3. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The COUNTY will prepare the plans and specifications for the storm drain improvements in Walnut Boulevard and Bradley Court. The DISTRICT will prepare the plans and specifications for the outfall structure. 4. AWARD OF CONTRACT The COUNTY and DISTRICT shall award separate contracts for the work outlined above. The DISTRICT will award its contract for the outfall structure within 120 days of the award of the COUNTY contract. • 5. SURVEYI &_ INSPECTION AND MITRACT ADMINISTRATION The COUNTY and DISTRICT will perform the surveyirg inspection, and contract administration for their respective contracts. 6. COST OF WORK The COUNTY and DISTRICT shall bear all cost associated with their respective portions of the work. 7. MAINTENANCE The COUNTY and DISTRICT shall maintain their respective portions of the work. 00311 i • 8. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall expire upon the COUNTY withdrawing its grant appli- cation or not obtaining a grant for funds under Title I of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976 or completion of the work under the two separate contracts outlined above. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND HATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT BBY J s P. Kenny, jhaIr3FCh irman, Board of SuperPfsors as EWrd of Supervisors officio the Board o Supervisors of the Contra Costa C my Flood Control' and Water Conservati6h District ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk By Deputy RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: VERNON L. CLINE, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ief Deput i ctor FORM APPROVED JOHN B. CLAUSEN, COUNTY COUNSEL By. Deputy r 00312 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Contract with Dr. Bogart for Autopsy Services, Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner On the recommendation of the County Sheriff-Coroner, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute MENEM a new contract with William M. Bogart, M.D., for autopsy-surgeon services, to increase the monthly compensation to $5,000 and to provide for payment of extra staff required in disasters, effective September 1, 1976. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig: Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Dr. Bogart C/o Sheriff affixed this28thday of September , 19 76 County Sheriff-Coroner — Auditor-Controller County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By .1 Deputy Clerk hlart 2raig 00313 H.24 4176 15m .Y AGREEMENT AUTOPSY SERVICES FOR CORONER 1. PARTIES. Effective September 1, 1976, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (hereinafter "County") and WILLIAM M. BOGART, N.D.,' (hereinafter "Contractor") mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. PURPOSE AND SERVICES. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 31000 and 27499 etc., the County requires, and the Contractor is a physician and pathologist qualified to provide, the following services for the County Sheriff-Coroner: (a) assume responsibility for and exercise administrative . ., .. supervision over medico-legal services performed in connection with coroner cases pursuant to Government Code §§27490 ff and 27520. (b) Examine medical history on all coroner cases to advise whether an autopsy is necessary. (c) Perform autopsies when considered necessary. (d) Perform microscopic tissue studies when required, and assure that toxicological work by outside laboratories is satis- factorily performed. (e) Provide a complete, written report immediately after an autopsy or examination of a decedent. (f) Obtain, schedule and pay for the services of autopsy physicians, acceptable to the Sheriff-Coroner, to assure availa- bility of autopsy services whenever required. Except in disasters (§3). Contractor is solely responsible for payments to each autopsy' physician, at rates agreed to between them. (r) Testify as required at Coroner's inquests and in court, In the capacity of expert autopsy surgeon, for such extra fees per appearance as may be agreed upon or provided by law. 3. PAYMENT: DISASTER. County shall pay Contractor $5,000 a month for these services (plus fees under §2 [g)) . In the event of a disaster Involving more than ten deaths in any one incident, County shall reimburse Contractor for his costs of additional staff, as mutually aEi•eed by Contractor and Sherit'f-Coroner or his designee before employment of :-aid additional staff. 4, lND E!'iiM1Ei,T CONTRACTOR. This agreement is by and between two iniependent contractors, and the Contractor and the autopsy physi- cians are not to be considered employees or agents of the County. However, the -Contractor shall be responsible to, and render his services heretSnJe u1 i.er the general direction of the Sheriff- Ccrorer. But the paries mutually understand that the Contractor is performinc professional medical services and that the County shall have no control over the details or methods by which the services are performed. 00314age 1 of 2) Microfilmed,with board order 5. TER;i. This agreement remains In effect through June 30, 1977, and from year to year thereafter. Nevertheless it may be terminated at any time upon 60 days prior written notice by either party to the other (see §9). 6. HOLD HARNESS. The Contractor shall- defend, save harmless and Indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation all consequen- , tial damages, from any c atse -whatsoever arising from or connected with the services hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence cif• the Contractor, his agents or employees. T. INSURANCE. At all times while this agreement is in effect, the ' Contractor shall keep in effect a policy policies of liability Insurance •• ' C e- gsur, limits of at least : 250,O00 f.a• na=cii person. and $504,0 to each accident or occurrence) for all damn es arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease arlsine out of Injury to oz- destruction of property for each accident c:• ^_eurence arising out of performance under this agree mens by him or h s appointees. The Contractor shall provide the. County with a Certificate of Insurance (with a 10-day cancellation clause) evidencing this coverage. 8. NON-ASSIGNABLE. The Contractor shall not assign this agreement, or moneys due or to become due hereunder, without the County's prior written ^_-7nsent. 9. NOTICES. All notices provided for by this agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States Postal . Service, first class postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the Sheriff-Coroner, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553- Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to him at 1771 Alray Drive, Concord, California 94519. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of ether delivery. 10. AP3,8IMYENT or MODIFICATION. This agreement may be amended or modified by the parties in writing. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CONTRACTOR By: Harry D. Reay, Sheriff-Coroner f William. Bogs t, M.D. Authori• ed by Board a Supervisors on gp L R 1976 , I P. Kenny Approval Recommended: C airman, Boa o ery sons ATTEST: J. R. OLS4 , CLERK By: - &*1.1,, l . oun m n s ator By X,l7 Contract prepared by DOPUW 67cry eXg County Counzel's Office GWM:df (8-18-76) (Page 2 of 2) 0U31CZ� 3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 2 In the Maher of Subdivision Ordinance for Mobile Homes. Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having commented that the high cost of land and improvements makes it economically impossible for many residents of the County to own their own homes; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the Planning Department study the feasibility of a subdivision ordinance for mobile homes permitting individual ownership of lots in mobile home parks; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this28thday of September , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ByRa i puty DeClerk Ronda Amdahl 0031, H-24 3/76 15m � z In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Grant Action for a Summer Youth Recreation Program IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Grant Action in the amount of $12,070 for submission to the Community Services Administration for the conduct of a Summer Youth Recreation Program for the period July 1, 1976 through September 30, 1976. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Community Services affixed this 28thday of September 1976 Administration c/o Schools Superintendent of Schools J. R. OLSSON. Chic Auditor-Controller By � Deputy Clerk Economic Opportunity Manpower Goi 0031'"1 H-24 3r,615m I hereby certify that the foregoing fs a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of SUperYisors on the date aforesaid, Orig: County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors CC: Community Services Administration affixed this 28thday of September . 1976 C/o Schools Superintendent of Schools J. FL OLSSON, Cleric Auditor-Controller ,7 . Economic Opportunity By � De" Clerk Goi Manpower 0031"l H-24 3/76 15. ,a COMMUNIT♦ SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Rrtrrved/w STATEMENT OF CSA GRANT OMS Appravar (OEO haraetioA 67JG-JI 1.-NAME AND ADDRESS OF GRANTEC 2. rR*f8'rEt NO. eU•IO SOURCE CODE 1111, ACTION NO. g Contra costa County _ l SO n2, -Board of Supervisors S. CFrECTIVE DATE 75 Santa Rarbara- Road July 1, 1476 Pleasant Rills, CA 94523 A. OSLICATIOfr DATE tPole 0. PROGRAM YEAR rlairrd to Corona,or Gra.ueJ )1— 9 «� FNOM7! A TD /30 . ' REQUIRED TERMI- PLANNED PROGRAM FEDERAL FUNDS NON-FEDERAL NATION MINIMUM P.A. ACTIVITY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NAME AWARDED SHARE DATE NO.MONTHS HO. CODE THIS ACTION jI/appri- FUN GING AMOUNT rabJrj PROVIDED - a., T. a. r. to. It. 12. IS. $12,070 X/ —0— N/A 4 t COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Reserved for STATEMENT OF CSA GRANT DLII Approval (OEO InstractioA 6716.1/ 1.-NAME AND ADDRESS OF GRANTEC 2. CR�tr�T$CL NO. FUND SOURCE CODE r�7• ACTION NO. g Contra Costa County _ OD off, • -Board of Supervisors S. EFFECTIvE DATE 75 Santa Barbara- P- July 1, 2476 Pleasant Rills, CA 94523 a. OSLICATION DATE(Date S. PROGRAM YEAR mailed to Governor or Grauee) FROM T09 TO9/30 • RECUIR EO TERMI- PLANNED P.A, PROGRAM FEDERAL FUNDS NOM-FEDERAL NATION MINIMUM NO. ACTIVITY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NAME ANARDEO SNARE DATE No.MON TNS CODE THIS ACTION Mar (if appli. FUNDING A AMOUNT cable) PROVIDED 60 GR 6 Recreation $12,070 N A -0- N/A 4 I t ' TOTAL $12,070 la. RECOMMENDATION FOR APP(10VAL I Certify to the sufficiency of this grant a=d r--Com d approval. TYPED NAME 6 TITLE OF RECOMMENDING OFFICIAL SIGMA=1 E OAT Eugene, Gonzales, Regional Dir: 7 a��a� t6. STATEN EN 'OF CSA APPROVAL Federal funds as shonra in Coltuea 9,are beteby obliamcd fat the pros.sm proposed III the grantee as nosed above and in the attacheents to this statement. Plogran account budgets may be modified by the tuantee only unde.general flexibility guidelines of in sccordx.ce with ttitten CSA approval. The Non-Federal Share may be met-by pooling as allowed by CSA lnstructions. FINAL APPROVAL OF NEADDUARTERR OFFICIAL SIGMATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL CATE Angel F. Rivera/PER Twx EG 76-09-17 ar�6 Associate Director for Operations GRANTEEACCEPT&HCE OF GRANT On behalf of the grantee,I accept the Assn[And all nwdit ea:ions, rtaual eauditions,special coaditi.as i tUouSb , and tequiiements attached hereto. There are- pares attached to this form. ACCEPTED BY:(T,ped+wale and title of oatlorised official stw TURE• r .1. P. KennyISE P 2 81916 Chairman, Board of Svpervisors � t CSA FORM 314(Tost) MAT Ts tME1'LACLS OEO FORM 714• ATL At1c T1.fUOf1{m W h rd ofd w n1cM"A.. DE UI J SCD UNtU % Ia7S.1 et f f 1 �—' Community Services Administration COURUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL- CONDITION t. NAME OF GRANTEE Z. GRANT NO, PROGnAM YR ACTION NO. Contra Costa County - 90188 _ 176 2. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO: ^•+ �- a a ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. M ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMeciils► 60164 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below.in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing greats under Title If or III-H of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1966 as amended. SPECIAL CONDITION REGARDING TRANSPORTATION These funds may not be used for transportation more than 100 miles outside .the boundaries of the grantee sinless specific written permission is granted by CSA: 043 .9 CI►P PORK 29 tREV.AUG 440 RC/'LACES CAP FORMS 29.29-.29b.29q 29e.DATED MAA 98 AND GSA OC to.Lsttt' otamun t} bcrt cc:s A miitistratiou — C0IAVNITY ACTION PROGRAM ' SPECIAL. C0:•I)ITIO;I 1. NAME of GRANTEC - 2. GHAl1T NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION CoDtra Costa County 90188 - 76 1 SPECIAL CONDITItNI APPLIES TO: A. 0ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS III GRANT ACTION 6. IXJONLY PnOGRAH ACCOUNT HUMBCRISI 60 This Srant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing ' grants under Title II or III-B of the Econotaic Opportunity All of I964 as amended. EXCEPT FOR AUDIT COSTS, THE GRANTEE SHALL NOT EXPE1,D GRAFT FUNDS AFTER 9/30/76-OR THE LAST LOCAL DAY OF SCHOOL VACATION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. THE PAYMENT OF COSTS INCURRED FOR PROGRAM OPERATIONS BEFORE THE ABOVE DATE, OR MINOR CLOSEOUT COSTS IN THE PERIOD - DZIEDIATELY SUBSEQUENT TO THE ENDIrG OF PROGRAIJ OPERATIONS ARE EXCLUDED FROM THIS RULE. i 00320 U.ti3 c.- I.VILACIM CO P:Ckwt:2i,=:.,25%.a:, I 27A,VA TP PAR Ci AND. tCAPi 2►� ourv.nu►:e111 a>e ae ewr�OaY 2]e.;.A:LO AUG t],nNlCil i•eL 4Aa11 l.tF.. omwun ty gervices A =iniaEration — COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ' SPECIAL CONDITION S. kAMt,Oi GRANTEE 2. GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION Contra Costa County _ _ • - 9188 t76 2. SOECIAL CONDITION A% Cl ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMBERIS) 60/64. This grant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addi:ion to the applicable General Conditions governing grants under Title 11 or III-B of the Eeonotaie Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. ASSURANCES: This form shall be signed at the same time as the CSA 314 and returned together with the copy of the CSA 314 to CSA. The Grantee (Sponsor) assures the Community Services Administration that: 1. It will not (and has not) because of this grant, reduce funds previously planned for summer youth recreation activities. 2. That arrangements have been made for appropriate bonding of grant officials. 3. A financial report will be submitted to CSA by 10-20-76 on forms to _ be providcd by CSA. 4. CSA audit requirements will be complied with. 5. Participants will not be exposed to conditions Which are unsanitary or hazardous or dangerous to their safety or health. 1 6. All transportation services under this program will be from sources properly licensed and insured to provide carraige of public and which are operated in compliance with all State and/or Federal statutes covering public transportation. 7. The grantee will alloy full access to-its activities and records (pertaining to this grant) to CSA personnel and the personnel of such other institutions as may be seleeLrd by CSA. B. All program activities delegated to another agency will be contracted for and such contracts will be submitted to CSA for approval before implementation. (It is understood that any contracts submitted in the form of a "Form 280" to meet this requirement. 9. General liability insurance, including automobile liability insurance must be obtained, in amounts which assure the adequate protection of program participants and the grantee. The required minimum liability coverage shall be $300,000 per accident and per person and the minimum property damage coverage shall be $25,000. In the case of those organ-. zations which could raise the defense of sovereign i=unity, the insur ance policy shall provide that this defense will not be raised by the organization of the insurer. . 00321 SIG\ATURE: 1^11[PLACL'3 CAP/Oe"tS 241.29..-)b.23C.234.oATLD MAA AA AND GSA OC /!. ••>� ...�r.naiiLET[. .. s COMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM —�omn ty ery ces %+ ministration SM SPECIAL CONDITION 2, GRANT NO: PROGRAM YR. ACTION NO. 1. NANL OF GRANTEE - Q0188 - t76 Contra Costa County _ ^- -- 6 /64 �_� - T_-M PPI 11s TO; LPe«ainzng to this grant) to CSA personnel and the personnel other institutions as may be selee�cu by CSA, 0€ such ersonn: • 8. All program activities • delegated to another agency will be contracted for and such contracts will be submitted to CSA implementation, (It is understood that an for approval before the form of a "Form 280t1 to tweet this y contracts submitted in requirement. 9. General liability insurance must be obtained including automobile -liability in amounts which assure the adequate protectionaofe d Program participants anthe gra coverae shall be $300t ntee. The required minimum liability Property damn per accident and per person and the minimu:a nations d ge coverage shall be $23;000. In the case of those organ- ch could' raise the defense of sovereign i=unity, ance policy shall Provide that this the insur organization of the defense will not be raised h . - the- SIGNATURE: 00321 y the R PLACt'i CAP Oa1tS 31.2f•,y6.Sic.293, �...^� OwTLO STAR as AND — GSA GSA DC 99. ' community Services Administration — COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION. 1. NAME Or GRANTEE2. GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION NO. • Contra Costa County - Qn188 176 • 1 SPECIAL CONOITIOM APPLIES TO: - �- 60/64 a- O ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMBER($) This grant is subject to the Special Condition below.in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing Grants under Title II or III-8 of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. SPECIAL CONDITION REGARDING EQUIPMENT b SUPPLIES ` 1. Equipment with a price-in excess of $200 may not be ptirchased under this grant unless the specific written consent of CSA is obtained. This grant does not constitute such consent. 2. Equipment with a price of less than $200 may not be purchased unless it was specifically listed in the approved proposal or an approved amendment to the proposal. 3. All equipment lists must be specific. That is, a reference to "sports equipment" or%raft equipment" will not be adequate. They must be at least as specific-as: baseballs and bats and either the approximate number or approximate cost camping stoves and either.the_approximate number or approximate cost , baseball gloves and either the approximate number or approximate cost 4. Everything which is not naturally used up in its initial use (craft supplies and food are examples of things which are naturally consumed at first use) shall be defined as equipment. S. Equipment and supplies purchased with these grant funds shall be for the sole use of the.summer youth recreation and transportation program. A. Any supplies remaining at the end bf the program must either be stored for use next summer or purchased from the project by the grantee. . B. Equipment remaining at the endcf'the program gust be available at the beginning of next sumer in at least as good condition as at the end of this suer. 6. Records sufficient to audit grantee compliance with the above shall be kept. 00322 CAP FORK 29 tnev.Luc nal REPLACCS CAP FORMS 29.2r•.'Sb.29t.294.DATED MAR N AND CSA DC $9.12'_ - CAP FORM 294.DATED AUG aT.■NICN ARE O=SnLQTa. Community Services Administration — COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION t. NAML OF GRANTEE 2. GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION NO. '76 Contra _Costa County •_ - 1 SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO; , L• 0 ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT HUM13ERISS 60/64 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below.in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing Grants under Title U or III-B of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. • - CONDITIONS APPLYING TO ALL SU?MR YOUTH RECREATION GRANTS , 1. Grant funds may not be used for nutritional purposes. However, funds may be used for the purchase of food incidental to trips and overnight camp_ outs if such food-expenditures are specified in the approved work program. 2. In any instances of conflict between the proposal and applicable CSA guidelines or between the proposal and these conditions, the applicable CSA guidelines and conditions shall prevail. 3. No positions shall be paid for under this grant in addition to those specified in the approved work program.. However, reductions in the number negotiated between the grantee and CSA shall be considered as a change in the work program. •00323 GP PORIA 24 IRCV.AUG tam R[PLACCs CAP roams 2t,2!•,25b.21c.ltd.DATED MAR to AND GSA. OC N.. CAP FORM 29e.OAT[D AUG 67.VNICN ARL OCSnL[TE. i Community Services Administration — COMMUHITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION i,-H AMV OF GRANTEE 2.•GRA►IT NO. PROGRAM YR_ ACTIO$` ,Contra' Costa County 90188 A SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO: �• , • a. •O ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMOERIS) 60/64 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below.in addition to the applicable General Conditions govetnin' grants under Title It or IIID of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. . CERTIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES -No later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of receipt of this grant, grantee shall submit to CSA/ ' Region IX, three (3) signed copies of the attached certification of expenditures for FY '75 Summer Youth Recreation Program. - 00324 CAP POHA 2? tnev.Aur.nal RCPLACt3 CAP PG$Ns 2a,2a•.2311-.22c,tad.DATED MAn a6 ANo csA oc f CAP FORM tae.OAT[D AUG 67.YIUCN ARE G3SnLCTE. CERTIFICATION • State of ) county-of) (Name of executive director or appropriate elected official) being first duly sworn "on oath says: That I am Executive Director of (Grantee name, address and CSA grantee number) That during the period to I, on behalf of- (Grantee name) administered a program entitled Summer Youth Recreation Program with funds received from the Community Services Administration (CSA) . t That (Grantee name) • received $ of funds from CSA and expended $ of these fu=dc leaving a balance of $ During the period of the program above named grantee -purchased $ worth of property and equipment with grant funds. That I have determined that the expenditure of CSA funds Joy - Grantee name) was made in a manner consistent with the grant conditic_-_ and the purposes of the grant. " Expenditure reX=r, ' the period to are attached. • Signature of Executive Director Signature of Grantee Finance Officer .j Sworn to before me. this day of , 19 . 0032 f _ r • CERTIFICATION State of ) County-of) - r (Name of executive director or appropriate elected official) being first duly sworn on oath says: That I am Executive Director of. (Grantee nave, address and CSA grantee number) That during the period to I, on behalf of (Grantee name) . -administered a program entitled Summer Youth Recreation - Progra,-a with funds received from the Conmunity Services Administration (CSA) . That (Grantee name) received $ of funds from CSA and expended $ of these fund--.'leaving a balance of $ During the period of the program above named grantee -purchased $ worth of property and equipment with grant funds. Tiiat I have determined that the expenditure of CSA funds py. Grantee name) was made in a manner consistent with the grant conditions • and the purposes of the grant. . E.�;penditure rafflVor w • the period to are attached. Signature of Executive Director Signature of Grantee Finance • Officer Sworn to before me. this day of , 19 0032& r CERTIFICATION State of ) j - County-of) j (Name of executive director or appropriate elected ofricial) � being first duly sworn on oath says: That I am Executive Director of (Grantee name, address and CSA grantee number) That during the period to I, on behalf of (Grantee name) a&ainist--red a program entitled Su.;i-ner Youth Recreation Program with funds received from the Community Services Administration (CSA). - � That - . (Grantee name) received $ of funds from CSA and expended $ of these fu^3c leaving a balance of $ During the period of the program above' named grantee 'purchased $ worth of property and equipment with grant funds. That I have determined that the expenditure of CSA funds Grantee name) was made in -a manner consistent with the grant conditions and the purposes of the grant. - Expendltuifto"t for 9 i the period to are attached. Signature of Executive Dixector Signature of Grantee Finance Officer . j Sworn to before me this day of , 19 i . : 00330 F t COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION - STATEMENT OF CSA GRANT Retemed for • (OEO Iar:rection 6710.1) 0.110 Approval 1. NAME AND ADURESS OF GN..I TEE 2.0014ANTEE No.I FU•/D pwhct:CODE �F�j �AC TION NO. -Contra Costa County C n.7. • Board of Supervls Ors - a. EFFECTIVC DATC 75 Santa Barbara Foad Julv 1, 1976 Pleasant Hills, CA 94523 a. OBLIGATION DATE Date - ( S. PR O.r.AAH YEAR nailed to Cmernor or 6ranteel *9 FNoY17/1 T /30 REQUIRED TERk11- PLANNEO PROGRAM FEDERAL FUNDS NON-FEDERAL NATION MINIMUM P.A. ACTIVITY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NAME AWARDED NO. SNARE DATE HO.MON T:_ CODE THIS ACTION (Ifapylr- FUNDING as AMOUNT cable) PROVIDED • a. 7. a. Y. to. It. 12. ta. 60 GR 6 Recreation S12,070 N/A -0- N/A 4 1 1 1 TOTAL S12,1370 RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL I certify to the sufficiency of this grant and recom _nd approval. TYPED NAME A TITLE OF RECOMMENDING OFFICIAL SIGNAT rDAT Eugene, Gonzales, Regional Dir. �k '' a a�aE 15 STATEMENT OF CSA APPROVAL Federal lands as sbom in Coltman 9.are hereby obl.sa:ed tot the program proposed by the grantee as noted above and in the attachments to this Statcocat- Program account budgets may be modified by the graatee only ander general IlexiSitity guidelines or in accordance with written CSA arrtotral. The Naa•Federal Share may be met by rooting as allured by CSA Instructions. FINAL APPROVAL OF HEADQUARTERS OFFICIALSIGNATURE OF APPROVING OFFICIAL OATS Angel F. Rivera/PER TWX EG 76-09-17 49975:: ��0/7� Associate Director for Operations ts. GRANTEE ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT On 1+ch3li of the grantee.I accept Its grant and all modifications. general conditions.special conditions I through , and tequiremrots attached hereto. There are pages attached to this form. ACCEPTED BY:(Typed name and title of oat4orized official NA TURC DATE 0 331 CSA FORM 31.1(Toa/) MAY Ts I"LPLACLS Oco FORM eta, ATc AUG 71. m&41CM MAY DE Us ED UNTI JUN S loyal 9 _ ommun ty Services Administratlon CO"UHITT ACTION PROGRAM • SPECIAL. CONDITION t. HAYS OF GRANTEE - _, GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION mc Contra Costa County 90188 176 3. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO: A. •Q ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT HumBERIS, 60/64 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing grants under Title 11 or III•B of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. SPECIAL CO'N'DITION REGARDING TRANSPORTATION These funds may not be used for transportation more than 100 miles outside thei boundaries of the grantee unless specific written permission is granted by CSA: CAP NORM 29 IRCv.AUG 04" /ICPLACLs CAP•Oh MS 34.22 .2/b.ZXC.240.OATLO MAR 44 AND GSA'DC 4 t.t3. AP/OwY 23e.DATED AUG OT.vNICN ARC onsnLCTC. P NX i f::1a>a:tuitq Sergi crs A 17Ititstration — C9:1MIUITY AC71711 Pit0URA3 • ?�CIaL CONDITION _ 1. 110,64E Cf Gn AN7Et. 2• GIIAUT 110. P.100PA14 YIL ACTrO/r'== Contra Costa County 90188 _ 76 a SFCCIAL C01:DITlo11 Ar•PLtES To: /. L,IALL PUOGnA!J ACCOUNTS III GRANT ACTICY b. I}:J ontY Pn00nA1t ACCOU•:T HUllDCn.SI 60 7llis grant is su;�j:et to ttl:Sp.eial Ca•Idi:cac 3_Ir.x, in %ddaio 1[o the x,I.litable General CoaditionS7;Dvetnino ,rr:.nts under Tittc 11-o:111-11 of the Eeu-lo-sic Opportunity Act of 1954 as amended. EXCEPT FOR AUDIT COSTS, 1:iE G--RANTER SH:'1LL-NOT EYPM D GRAENT FUNDS AFTER 9/30/76 OR TEE LAST LOCAL DAY OF SCHOOL VACATION,_ WHICHEVER COMM FIRST. THE PAIUMN- T OF COSTS INCL-R ED FOR PROGRAM OPEICATIONS BEF071a THE ABOVE DATE, OR HINOIZ CLOSEOUT COSTS IN THE PERIOD IAMEDIATELY SUBSEQUEI:T TO THE ENDING-OF PROGRAM OPER4TITNS • ARE EXCLUDED FROM TtiIS 0-FE. F 00333 I;:"'.AtJ•;t'd 811"LACa c,.�:L.t:::,..L".,2,L,,2c,`LJ,11.1"0 141•AD f a AN41 •••YcsA Df i!� CAP 11V.IV 2".VA-Mo Aur.67,-illicit A.IG p::nr"r. o.=aun ty Services Administration - CO3;AUNITY ACTION PROGn114 SPECIAL CONDITION t. NANL Or GRANTCC 2. GRANT//0. PnOGtt As,t YR. ACTIOI' Contra Costa County 90188 - r76 / ). -SPECIAL CON DI TtOti APPlJZS TO: ---_ _- -—� •�• • t•.. ALL PnoORAL ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. t�]ONLY P2DGRAY.ACCOUNT tIU"9EnI3) 60/64 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addition to the applicable General Conditions gavernin. grants under Titic 11 Or 11I-D of the Economic Oppottunity Act of 1961.as a:acnded. ASSUIt VICES- This form shall be signed at the same time as•the CSA 314 and returned together with the copy of the CSA 314 to CSA. The Grantee (Sponsor) assures the Comunity Services Administration that: 1. It will not (and has not) because of this grant, reduce funds previously planned for sutmer youth recreation activities. 2. That arrangements have been made for appropriate bonding of grant officials. 3. A financial report will be submitted to CSA by 10-20-76 on forms to t• be provided by CSA. 4. CSA audit requirements will be co=plied vith. 5. Participants will not be exposed to conditions which are unsanitary or hazardous or dangerous to their safety or health. 6. All transportation services under this program will be from sources properly licensed and insured to provide carraige of public and which are operated in compliance with all State and/or Federal statutes covering public transportation. 7. The grantee will alloy full access to-its activities and records (pertaining to this grant) to CSA personnel and the personnel of such other institutions as may be seleeLci by CSA. 8. All program activities delegated to another agency will be contracted for and such contracts will be submitted to CSA for approval before implementation. (It is understood that any contracts submitted in the form of a "Form 280" to meet this requirement. 9. General liability insurance, including autosobile liability insurance must be obtained, in n=ounts which assure the adequate protection of program participants and the-grantee. The required minimum liability coverage shall be $300,000 per accident and per person and the minimum property damage coverage shall be $25;000. In the case of those organi zations which could raise the defense of sovereign i=unity, the insur- ance policy shall provide that this defense will not be raised by the organization of the insurer. SIGSr1Tli.RE: ....��w� nZPLAC:]CAP rOv:tS 20.274.231h.22C.232.OATZO NAR 62 At GSA OC 99.1 I (,orcun ty erV ces A miniatration - COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECiAL.CONDITION t. NAME OF GRANTEE 2. GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION No. Contra Costa Counter 40188 176 7. SPECIAL CONDITION APPLIES TO_.- - K 60/64 e 0 ALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION b. C3 ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUNT NUMBERISI This grant is subject to the Special Condition below, in addition to the applicable General Conditions governing grants under Title if or III-Ij of the Ecenomie Opportunity Act of 1964 as amended. SPECIAL CONDITION REGARDING EQUIPMENT b SUPPLIES 1. Equipment with a-pricein excess of $200 may not be purchased under this - grant unless the specific written consent of CSA is obtained. This grant does not constitute such consent. 2. Equipment with a price of less than $200 may not be purchased unless it was specifically listed in the approved proposal or an approved amendment AN to the proposal. 3. All equipment lists must be specific. That is, a reference to "sports equipment" orlcraft equipment" will not be adequate. They must be at least as specific-as: I baseballs and bats and either the approximate number or approximate cost camping stoves and either the approximate number or approximate cost baseball gloves and either the approximate number or approximate cost I 4. Everything which is not naturally used up in its initial use (craft supplies and food are examples of things which are naturally consumed at first use) shall be defined as equipment. 5. Equipment and supplies purchased with these grant funds shall be for the sole use of the suer youth recreation and transportation program. A. Any supplies remaining at the end of the program must either be stored for use next summer or purchased from the project by the grantee. , B. Equipment remaining at the endcf the program must be available at the beginning of next suer in at least as good condition as at the end of this sumer. 6. Records sufficient to audit grantee compliance with the above shall be kept. • -00335 CAP PORM 29 tREv.Aug MI hE PLACES CAP FOA.IS 21.29-.29111-19C.Sb,DATED IIAR 0•AND CSA OC 69.01- CAP 9.Il:CAP FORM 224.DATED AUG N.WHICH ARE OASt1LETE. ^� ot=tn t) SerV Ces Administration - COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM SPECIAL CONDITION f. Nwal:OF GRANTEE y GRANT NO. PROGRAM YR. ACTION N Contra Costa Countv - '76 1 SPECIAL CONOITION APPLIES TO: .. L. GALL PROGRAM ACCOUNTS IN GRANT ACTION a. I,ONLY PJ%0GRAY ACCOUNT NUMBERISI 60/64 This grant is subject to the Special Condition below. in addition to the applicable Genera_I Conditions governing grants under Title II or III-B of the Economic Opponunity Act of 1464 as amended. CONDITIONS APPLYING TO ALL SU,%DMR YOUTH RECREATION GRANTS 1. Grant funds may not be used far nutritional purposes. However, funds may be used for the purchase of food incidental to trips and overnight camp- cuts if such food expenditures are specified in the approved work program. , 2. In any instances of conflict between the proposal and applicable CSA guidelines or between the proposal and these conditions, the applicable CSA guidelines and conditions shall prevail. 3. No positions shall be paid for under this grant in addition to those specified in the approved work program. However, reductions in the number ' negotiated between the grantee and CSA shall: be considered as a change in the work program. • 00336 CAP roR$4 2P incv.wua ea/ RCPLACCi CAP FOR"%29.290,S96.isc,ase.DATED UAR ea AND GSA:oC_as CAP•CAH ase.DATED AUG$7.WHICH ANE 033nLCTE. ., - Z'p IRCV.AUG NI G C AP IOIYII a tr . SPECIAL. CONDITION f. pANC or GRANTEE 2 GnmsT NO. PROGRAM YR. . AG'. -Contra Costa County 90188 - f S. SPECIAL CONDITIO"APPLIES TO: Yr _... ... •MwI - t a. •QALL PROGRAM ACCOUIITS IN GRANT ACTION b. ONLY PROGRAM ACCOUMT NUMDERISI 60/64 This grant is subject to thF Special Condition below.in addition to the applicable General Condit}ons Bove ,grants under Title 1I or 111-D of the Economic Opportunity Act of 1464 as amended. £; CERTIFICATION OF WElITURES No later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of receipt of this grant, grantee shall submit to CSA/ Region.IX, three (3) signed copies of the attached certification of expenditures for FY '75 Summer Youth. Recreation Program. ; ` , • 1 - t ` i 0033 GAC'i 0#1tu 2? tnCY.AUG L7i REPLACCZ CAP FOAM'.10. 22b.22[.22J.trATLD ttAn 66 AND, GSA•CIC 11;�_ CAP FORM 22q OATCO AUG 67.WHICH ARE O'SIILCTE. - CERTIFICATION State of ) County-of) - r (None of executive director or appropriate elected official) being first duly sworn on oath says: That I am Executive Director of (Grantee name, address and CSA grantee number) That during the period to • I, on behalf of (Grantee name) administered a program entitled SuNmer Youth Recreation Program with funds received from the Community Services Administration (CSA). - I , That (Grantee name) received $ of funds from CSA and expended $ of these f=3.^ leaving a balance of $ During the period of the program above named grantee -purchased $ worth of property and equipment with grant funds. That I have determined that the expenditure of CSA funds Joy • (Grantee name) 00338 was made inn -a manner consistent with the grant condition- and the purposes of the grant. Expenditure reports for s - the period . to are attached. Signature of Executive Direcicor Signature of Grantee Finance officer Sworn to before me this day of r 19 ' Si~: Uo339 RECE_1VED • c; t - .-n 1SC0� RJ) 0.0 - c. :s An f 1 11 os 11WN l - 167151 WLRDL As - k " j4&&e i - r RAAUIJAZ RUEVEGLO322 2232048-UUUU--RUWLROL. i CAHQ FM AINGEL F. RIVERA ASSOC- DIR FOR OPERATIONS CSA WASH D.C. TO REGIONAL DIRECTOR, REGION IX BT EG #76-09-17 " SUBJ: FINAL APPROVAL OF 4 SUMMER YOUTH GRANT ACTION FY 76. ` 7HE FOLLOWING GRANTS ARE HEREBY APPROVED THIS. DT 8/10/76 TO CARRY OUT THE PROGRAMS SPECIFIED IN YOUR TWX OF 8/5/76 �r •-ATTACH-A-COPY--OF—TH-IS--TWX TO-EACH-CSA-FORM-314•-FOR-EACH-GRA NTEE-IN--__mss_ THE AMOUNT LISTED BELOW. NO GRANTS SHALL BE MAILED TO THE GRANTEE OR i GOVERNOR PRIOR IO THE RECEIPT OF A TTWX INFORMING YOU OF CONGRESSIONAL RELEASE. " GRA;:TEE tD. GRANTEE NAME AMOUNT EFF DATE 90660-76-10 COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY 56,290 7/1/76 OF V:ASHOE COUNTY RENO,NEV. - _ i 91117-75-01 COUNTY OF SAN LUIS 03ISPO 6,120 7/1/76 90166-76-02 CONTRA' COSTA COUNTY BOARD 12,070 7/1/76 ; OF SUPERVISORS. CA i 93067-76-01 CITY OF LONG BEACH LONG 50,830 7/21/76 - BEACH, CA BT i' NNNN [67151 ,hLROL t • 00340 Community Services .Administtation Region IX 100 McAllister*Street ' San Francisco. California 94102 INSTRUCTIONS TO SUM.tiER RECREATION PROGRAM GRANTEES ' . 1. Review carefully the conditions of this grant. ! 2. If you accept the grant, have the CSA Form 314 signed by an official authorized by your board to . sign contractual documents. 3. File the original Form 314. It is your record that the grant was awarded to you. 4.. Mail the other copy of the Form 314 .back to ,CSA, . Region I% in San Francisco, 'California• together with a signed' copy of the assurances. Upon receipt of these documents, if everything Else is in order, we will ask the U.S. Treasury to process a check for you. • . 00341 Ac regiment for Delegation of Activities Under Grant No.--- This agreement entered into as of ........... changes,including any increase or decrease in the 19._, including all attachments and conditions amount-of the Delegate's compensation, which annexed hereto (which are expressly made part -are mutually agreed upon by and between the hereof), shall govern certain activities of the Grantee and the Delegate, must be incorporated ............................................ in written amendments to this contract. (name of program account for the delegated 5. COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL LAWS. The activities) financed under Grant No............. Delegate shall comply with all applicable laws, during the period ............ to ............. ordinances, and codes of the state and local gov which are to be carried out by ................ ernments. ............................................ 6. COVENANT AGAINST CONTIA'GENT (name of delegate agency), hereinafter referred FEES. The Delegate warrants that no person or to as the"Delegate", on behalf of ............. selling agency or other organization has been em- ................................. m- ................................. ployed or retained to solicit or secure this contract (name of grantee),hereinafter referred to as the upon an agreement or understanding for a com- "Grantee." mission.percentage,brokerage,or contingent fee. The Grantee and Delegate agree as follows: For breach or violation of this warrant the 1. WORK TO BE PERFORMED.The Delegate Grantee shall have the right to annul this contract shall, in a satisfactory manner as determined by without liability or, in its discretion, to deduct the Grantee,perform all activities in Attachment from the contract or otherwise recover the full "A". amount of such commission, percentage, broker 2. COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PRO- age; or contingent fee, or to seek such other GRAM. All activities authorized by this agree- remedies as legally may be available• ment will be performed in accordance with the . 7. SCHEDULE OF PAYMENT. Subject to re- approved work program, the approved budget, ceipt of funds from OEO, the Grantee agrees to the grani conuitions and relevant OEO directive;. reimburse the Delegate for authorized expendi- S. REPORTS. RECORDS & EVALUATIONS. tures. An advance of $......... for estimated The Grantee shall supervise, evaluate, and pro- expenditures for ......... (months) will be vide guidance and direction to the Delegate in the made to the Delegate, who will submit to the conduct of activities delegated under this con- Grantee vouchers that are sufficient to support tract. The Delegate agrees to submit to the payment under the Grantee's accounting proce- Grantee such reports as may be required by OEO dures established or approved by the Grantee's directives or by the Grantee, including the re- accountant. Within ......... days the Grantee ports listed in Attachment "B" according to the will approve or disapprove payment of the vouch- schedule there set out. ers, and will make additional payments equal to The Delegate also agrees to prepare and retain, the amount of such approved expenditures to the and permit the Grantee to insp--ct as it deems Delegate. In no event, however,will the Delegate necessary for grant purposes (in addition to in- receive reimbursement for personnel costs ex- spections authorized by the conditions in the grant seeding $.......... or for non-personnel costs from OEO) the records listed in Attachment"C". exceeding $.......... except as it has received as well as all other records that may be required prior written authorization from the Grantee. by relevant OEO directives, with the exception which is incorporated into and shall be attached of confidential client information. The Delegate to this contract. further agrees that the Grantee may carry out Br TERMINATION. The Grantee may,by giv- monitoring and evaluation activities to include. ing reasonable written notice specifying the ef- at a minimum, those listed in Attachment "D", festive date, terminate this contract in whole or and will effectively ensure the cooperation of the in part for cause.which shall include: (1) failure, Delegate's employees and board members in such for any reason, of the Delegate to fulfill in a efforts. timely and •proper manner its obligations under 4. CHANGES. The Grantee may, from time to this contract. including compliance with the ap- time.request changes in the scope of the services proved program and attached•conditions. with of the Delegate to be performed hereunder. Such statutes and Executivelp >l2nd with such • OEO FORM 290 wu¢70 �11VVtt11``�� OEO dirertires ` cable at mar any time; (2) Sul became beneraItr appli- fico to OEO or to the mission t bu incorr a Gra br he Del relm �� ect or into ntee of reports that incurred in expenses reasonably (3) ineffective ort inpro a am materi;tl respect;are tract. IV Satisfactory Performanceand necessarily m dam'this contract pang (use°S funds proed shall not beJretieve ing the abvethe Delegate the con. ^^� Pension or tet. for damafies sustain of liability to the Delegate of any breacGrantee h -of tied by� the to by virtue t',cr by tt, 11 1 to i�w . a• or IL. -••' l received t the Grantee (in addition to in- Ceeding $--•-..-•• , wept as it the Grantee. and Perinifor Fant Pure° in the grant ecceeding $••••-. ••,nation ftOm necessa the conditions "C'•• written authors shall be attached speciions an listed in Attachment aired pr10r rated into and - the rev which ` incorpo OEO) that the exception Gran from all other records to this ct• may.by gs as well as directives. w'th Delegate ERbiII4ATION•The Grantee the ef- by relevant OEO tion- The Ss T nable w-litters notice specifying whole or tial client in i° " out contract y carry Ing date terminate this failure. of con that the Grantee include. 11 include: (1) „D.., fective da use.which shall to e. fulfill is s further Rgr evaluation activities to in��for ca of the Delegate Attachment tanner its obligations under. monitoring those listed meoopemtion of the for any TegSOn• at a minimum. compliance with the 8P- at in such timely and propeT span with.:.: and will efiectivelr ensure she t. including conditions- employees employees and ibis contras and attached with such ; Delegatetee may from time to proved PfOgra Executiveow ad etlorta CIJANGES-The Gran of the services statutes and 11V U 4. re es in the Scope of Such time. Chang to to be perform of the Delega • OEO FORM 2so *UG 70 i -OEO directives as may become generally appli- reimbursed expenses reasonably and necessarily cable at any time; (2) submission by the Dele- incurred in satisfactory performance of the con- Fate to OEO or to the Grantee of reports that are tract. Notwithstanding the above, the Delegate incorrect or incomplete in any material respect; shall not be relieved of liability to the Grantee (3) ineffective or improper use of funds provided for damages sustained by the Grantee by virtue under this contract; and (4) suspension or ter- of any breach -of the contract by the Delegate mination by OEO of the grant to the Grantee and the Grantee may withhold any reimburse- under which this contract is made,or the portion ment,to the Delegate for the purpose of set-off thereof delegated by this contract. The Grantee until such time as the exact amount of damages may also assign and transfer this contract to due the Grantee from the Delegate is agreed upon another grantee when required to do so by OEO or otherwise determined direction. 9. NON-FEDERAL SHARE. The Delegate If the Delegate is unable or unwilling to.com- will contribute$......... to the program funds. ply with such additional conditions as may be Such contribution shall be in cash in the amount lawfully applied by OEO to the grant to the of $.......... and in-kind in the amount of Grantee,the Delegate shall terminate the contract $.......... (If none,state "none.") by giving reasonable written notice to the Grantee, 10. REVIEW OF NEW DIRECTIVES. The signifying the effective date thereof. In such Grantee will submit promptly to the Delegate for event the grantee may require the delegate to comment those proposed additional directives ensure that adequate arrangements have been that it receives from OEO for comment- made for the transfer of the delegated activities In witness whereof,the Grantee and the DeIe to another Delegate or to the Grantee. gate have executed this agreement as of the date In-the event of any termination. all property first above written. and finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports purchased or prepared by ..................... the Delegate under this contract shall be disposed . Delegate Grantee of according to OEO directives, and the Delegate By: ................. By: ........:........ shall be entitled to compensation for any un- Position! Position: December 1968 Gro 096.062 00343 i EFPECTIVE: JOY 28. 1975 CFZ%TP.AL CONDI T IO`:S GOVEI:.LNG GRANTS UNDER TITLES II., III-P.,and VII of the t-conomic Opportunity Act of 1964, as amended (including amendments•4ivade by the Cov=unity Services Act of 1974) Program funds expended under authority of this fundin- action are subject to cite provisions of the. C.o►.aunity Services Act of 1974, the Zeneral conditions listed belou, any attached spec;al grant conditions, and Community Services Administration (CSA) directives. The grantee is expected to inform CSA promptly if it fails to receive, or has reason to::alieve it has failed to receive, all CSA applicable directives or any rttacitzents to the Statemant of OEO Grant. Hany of those provisions do not represent invariable policies of the CSA and exceptions should be requested is cases in which compliance with one or more of then would cause unnecessary difficulties in carrying out tate approved program. Requirements found in grant conditions or CSA directives may be waived only by a Britten notification signed by an authorized CSA official. Any such waiver must be explicit: no usiver may be inferred from the fact that the funding action is responsive to a grant funding request which may have contained material incoa- sistcnt with.one or more of these conditions. 1. DEFINITIONS. l:s used in these conditions: (a) An "approvcd program!' consists only of those activities described in the grant funding request for which funding is approved in the Statement of OEO Grant and its attachments (which may include i modifications of proposed activities) or in CSA approved written amanc maats to tate State•renr of Uz-O Grant. (b) "Program account funding period" extends from the effective date of a new or refu.ding action throubh the termination date or expira- tion of planned number of months•for which funding is provided. (c) "Total program funds" refers to all amounts approvcd for expenditure for the approved program as shown on the Statement of OEO Grant, ,,:hether such amounts are derived from Federal or non-Federal sources, or whether they are provided in cash or in kind. (d) "CSA directives" are strtem=ts of policy and procedure published in the CSA publications system. 2. APPLIC.11JL'rrY Cr.- CONDITIMS TO DELEGATE AGENCIES. These conditions are applicable both to the grantee and to any delegate agency or organiza- tion that, pursuant to an agreement with the grantee, undertakes responsi- bility for any part of the approved program. Such an agreement may be entered into only if (1) the intention :o make such a delegation to the p=rticular n:;ency has been set fortis in the funding request fur this grant action or his otherwit:c been approved by CSA, and (2) the contract contains all of the provisions found in the approved "Standard Contract Form for Delegation of Prog rz= Accounts." 4 revised - June 1975 I'a 00344 y 2 • 3. LI2f iATIO1S ON EXIVNDITURE OF PROGRAM MMS. Expenses charged against program funds may not be incurred prior to the effective date of the grant or subaelucnt to the grant termination date and may be incurred only as necessary to carry out the purposes and activities of the approved program. Such expenditures may not exceed the maximam limits shown on the Statement of OEO Grant"or those subsequently approved for that approved pro,-ram, subject to allowable flexibility guidelines published by CSA. All expenses incurred for the approved program trust be supported by approved contracts, purchase orders, requisitions, bills, " or other evidence of liability consistent uith the grantee or dele,uke agency's established purchasing procedures. Erpenaes charged against program funds must also be incurred in accordance with CSA directives. Liabilities of the grantee or its delegate a3encies to third parties as a result of termination action which are costs of phasing out in accordance with CSA directives or are specifically approved scall be considered proper expenditures of program funds. CSA will determine the disposition of onexpended funds at the termination of tite grant. 4. LIMITMONS ON E.XPENDIT"iMES OF FEDERAL FU:MS. Expenditures of funds derives; from Federal grant funds must not exceed in any event the amount of the Federal grant shcwn in the Statement of OEO Grant, (Column 9, OEO Form 314). ?:oreover, if a minimum non-Federal percentage of program funds is shown in the Statement of 020 Grant (Column 10, OEO Form 314), the portion of the total expenditures of'the approved program derived- "'" , from non-Federal sources, valuated in accorc:.nce with CSA Instructions, (; must not be less than that minimum percentage of the total program' funds for the approved program. This requirement must be met for each program account funding period, and should be substantially true for each finan- cial reporting period. Deficiencies of non-Federal share in one. program account may be supplied by an excess in other program accounts consis- tent with applicable CSA Instructions concerning the pooling of non- Federal share. Further, the amount of total program funds derived from Federal grant funds must not exceed the grantee's allowable costs .for the approved programa which have been or are to be paid in cash. 5. PBOPFPJ'P. No proZ•ram funds may be expended or costs incurred for the - purchase of real property except as in accordance with regulations on the -acquisition, crunership, and disposition of personal propttrty as set forth in CSA directives. 6. DISCRIiffIaMON PROHIBITED, No parson in the United States stall on the ground of race, color, religion, ser_, age, or national oririn, be excluded from participation in, be denied the proceeds of, or be :subject to discrimination under the program approved res a result of this funding request. The grantee and its dele,,ate agencies will comply frith the regulations promulgated by the Director of CSA, pursuant to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and pursuant to the Community Services act of 19711. Revised - June 1975 Page 2 of.S • • 0034 i 3 7. _DISCRII.111=10t IN F. PLOYlENT PR011ll;I=ED. In all hiring or cmploymenr f rade possible by or resulting from rhis grant action, each employer � (1) will not discriminate against any e1:�ployc•e or applicant for'employ- meat because of race, color, religion, rer., age, or national origin, and (2) will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard . to their race, color, religion, sex., age, or national origin. This requirement shall apply to, but Lot he limited to, the folleraing: e>.ployraent, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruit- ment advertising; layoff or termination; rates or pay or other form: of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The grantee and its delegate agencies shall comply with all applicable Statutes and Executive Orders on equal employlnant opportunity and this grant action shall be governed by the provisions of all such Statute and Executive: Orders, including enforcement provisions, as implecented by, but not limited to, CSA directives. 8. RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS. The grantee-and its delegate agencies shall ensure that any part of the approved program that is conducted by a church or church related institution is entirely non-sectarian in content and purpose, and that CSA directives on grants and delegations to churches or church related institutions are satisfied. 9. LABOR STAIMARDS. All laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors in the construction, alteration or repair, including painting and decorating, of projects, buildings, -and works which are federally-assisted under this grant shall be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on similar construction in the locality, as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis- Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a-5). ' 10. PATENTS. Any discovery or invention arising out of or developed in the course of wort: aided by the grant shall be promptly and fully reported to'the Director of CSA for determination_ as to whether patent protection on such invention or discovery shall be sought and how the rights in the invention or discovery, including rights under any patent issued thereon shall be disposed of and administered, in order to protect the public interest. 11. COPYRICIE S. If the grant results in a boil: or other copyrifllta ble mat- erial, the author is free to copyright the work, but CSA reserves a royal- ty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, all copyrighted material and any material ehich can be copyrighted resulting from the approved _ program. 12. P.EPORTS, RECORDS, A:Bti INSPECTIONS. The J;rantec and its delegate a.;encies shall submit financial, program progress, evaluation, and other repart.s as required by CSA directives, and shall 1:aintain such praperty, personnel, financial and other records and accounts as are decmad necessary by CS!'. to 1 Lavised - June 1975 `-� Pale 3 of 5 • • 00346 s fissure proper accounting for all preli-ran funds. The griantee and its ' delegaLur agenciez and coutractorz shall permit on-site inspections by CSA ri:presenLative:, and shall errvclively require expioyees and beard ==burs to furnish such .infor.union DS, in the jndgamant of the*CSA representatives, may be relevant to a.question of compliance with-grant conditions and CSA directives, or the cffect•iveuccs, legality, and achievements of the pro;;ram. All grant records will be made available to the authorized representatives of CSA or Cite Comptroller General of the United States, and will be retained for three years after the expira- tion of this grant unless permission to destroy thew is granted by the Director of CSA. 13. COVED:NT A.CAL7S1 CO,4Ti:1GM'.T FREES. The grantee warrants that no person or selling agency or other organization has been employed-or retained to solicit or secure this funding action upon an agreement or under- standing for co.-unission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee. For breach or violation of this warrant the goverment shall have the right to annul this. funding action without liability or, in its dis- cretion, to deduct from the grant or otherwise recover tha full amount of such cor:.mission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, or to seek such other remedies as may be legally available. 14. SUSPENSION MM TEP.iiL`M-10.N. The Director of CSI& may in accordance with published regulations, suspend or terminate this grant in whole-or in part for cause, which shall 'include: (1). failure or unwillingness of the grantee or its delegat agencir=s to comply with the approved pro= gram including attached c. itior vith applicable statutes and Exec- ff utive Orders, or with such CSA di. Lives as may become generally l applicable at any time; (Z) submission by the grantee or its delegate agencies to CSI. of reports which are incorrect or incomplete in .any material respect; (3) ineffective'or improper use of Federal funds by the grantee or its•delegate agencies; (it) making any change which sig- nificantly impairs. the representative character of the grantee's policy- making body or the grantee's capacity to enlist community support; (5) failure of the grantee either to *adequately monitor and evaluate f program activities delegated to other agencies, or to provide effective guidance to such agencies in carrying out the purpose and activities of the portions of the approved program delegated to them. This grant may also be suspended or terminated in whole or in part in the event the grantee is a Cons-nni ty Action. Agency and a new agency is recognized by CSA as the Co:.r::unity Action Agency for all or part of the area served by the grantee in accordance with CSA directives. In such event part of the grant funds and the grantee's or delegate agencies' functions, obli- gations, records (or copies), authority and property relating to assis- tance provided to the grantee or its delegate agencies under this funding shall be transferred by the grantee and its deletate agencies to such newly recognized agency. No suspension or termination will effect any expenditures or legally binding comwittx..nts made prior to receiving notice of the suspension or termination, provided such expenditures or commitments were made in good faith►and not in anticipation of termination Revised - June 1975 Page 4 of 5 00347 and are otherwise allowable. Funds shall not be treated as committed for this purpose solely by virtue of a grantee's contract or other Coc.raitmcnt to a delegate agency. Upon suspension or termination, the disposition of unexpended Federal funds and'property purchased with progra: funds will be subject to CSA direction. 15.• SUCCESSOR AUTHORITY OF CO.%u4Wx:ITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION. By virtue of the Conmunity Svrvices Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-644), -the Community Services Administration (CSA) is, in all respects and for all purposes, the successor authority to the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO). Pursuant to section 601(d)(2) of the Com.•nunity Services Act of 1974, all references to the Office of Economic Opportunity, in official documents including but not limited to, grant docu=:nts and regulations, shall lie deemed to refer to the Community Services Ad;ainistratioa, as set forth in 050 I:otice 6000-3 "Successor Authority to the Office of Economic Opportunity," dated January 15, 1975 and published in Volume:. 40 of the Federal Register at page 3213 (January 20, 1975). All references to "CSA" Directives" or "CSA Instructions" in these general conditions, and special conditions attached hereto and the grant-racking documents themselves shall be read so as to include all regulations issued by the Office of Economic Opportunity and any subsequent regulations issued by the Community Services Administration. Stich regulations, t:aether referred to as "OEO" or "MA" re2ulati.ons, I..: �ructinns or notice, re-3in in force and are deemed to be the •olicy stztements of the Coa_runity Services Administration until superseded, rescinded, or charged. All references herein to "Statement of OEO Grant", or a portion thereof, are deemed to refer to the document, regardless of form or title, utilized by the Comaunity Services Administration to make grants under the authority of the Co=unity Services Act of 1974. All references to the Community Services Act of 1974 shall be read so as to include the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 as attended. ' Revised - ,lune 1975 , A an0 fao•sat Page 5 of j • 00348 J In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of Lease with Rubicon, Inc. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a lease with Rubicon, Inc. for use of premises at 169 - 6th Street, Richmond by Social Service Department, for the period commencing October 1, 1976 to September 30, 1977 under terms as more particularly set forth in said lease. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Real Property Division Super4isom cc: Social Service Department affixed this 28ttV0y of September , 1976 County Auditor-Controller — County Counsel Public Works Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Buildings A Grounds By Deputy Clerk Real Property Mary s Lessor (via R/P) County Administrator 00349 H-24 3/76 ISm 3 LEASE 169 6th St., Richmond Social Service Dept., Food Stamp Program 1. PARTIES: -Effective on SEP 2 8 , 1976, RUBICON, INC., hereinafter .called LESSOR, and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called COUNTY, mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. LEASE OF PREMISES: LESSOR, for and in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, hereby leases to COUNTY and COUNTY accepts and takes those certain premises consisting of 3 rooms on the ground floor of the "Parsonage Building" at 169 . Sixth Street, Richmond, more particularly shown outlined in red on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. TERM: The term of this agreement is for one year commencing October 1, 1976 and ending September 30, 1977. 4. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the term or extension of this lease shall be construed to be a tenancy from month to month under the same terms and conditions. 5. RENT: COUNTY agrees to pay to LESSOR as rent and use of said premises a monthly rental of Two Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($200.00) payable in advance on the first day of each month during the term of this lease. Said rent is hereby assigned and shall be payable to Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church, 520 Bissell Ave., Richmond, CA 94801. 6. USE OF THE PREMISES: The premises shall be used during the term hereof for the sale and distribution of food stamps by Brinks Incorporated or other contractor selected by COUNTY. Premises shall be used on the average of 4 days per month between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. commencing on the first day of each month. In the event the first day falls on a Sunday, premises may be used on the Saturday preceding, and the following Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. Premises shall not be used on Sunday nor shall Sunday be considered as day of occupancy. 7. UTILITY SYSTEMS: LESSOR shall furnish and maintain any and all electrical, water, plumbing, heating and ventilating systems in good working order. - l - Microfilmed with board order B. UTILITIES AND JANITORIAL: LESSOR shall pay for gas, water and electric service provided to the leased premises. LESSOR shall provide daily janitorial service to the demised premises including restrooms and exterior cleanup. 9. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIRS: LESSOR shall keep the demised premises in good order, condition and repair. COUNTY shall be responsible only for maintenance required because of abnormal or abusive use that occurs during the hours it occupies the demised premises. 10. HOLD HARMLESS: It is understood and agreed that LESSOR and the Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises while said persons are on COUNTY business and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whomsoever while in or upon said premises during the hours COUNTY occupies said premises in conjunction with the performance of COUNTY business; and COUNTY hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said premises. LESSOR agrees to hold COUNTY completely harmless from damages to persons or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the persons or property when and if said persons or property are not acting in conjunction with COUNTY business. 11. TERMINATION: In the event the use and occupancy of the premises is not satisfactory, this agreement may be terminated by either party by giving the other party sixty days prior written notice of said termination. 12. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that this lease is a•sublease under the Master Lease between Elizabeth Missionary Baptist Church as LESSOR and Rubicon, Inc. as LESSEE dated 2e &r AI- iq'�S and Rubicon, Inc. has the right to sublease to COUNTY as provided herein. 13. SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNS, SUB-LEASES: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the respective parties hereto. - 2 - 00351 - 14. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease.- LESSEE LESSOR COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California - _ oL� 4iCrman, Board oT Supe sors; ac3 � 1 �rr -roa. 3ccc,J ux.'- ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, C erk BY i2it uo Deputy 6gclry Cte, RECOMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By Cou ty Administrato B l� Y Deputy, Public Wo ks D for Buildings b Grounds By Real Property A7-*'ZZ APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By. VICTOR J. WESTMAM Deputy, County Counsel r - 3 - 00352 1 Lr400, . 10 W � o 1 � � 4 00353 I t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Motter of Approval of Contract Extension With James F. Austin for Evaluation of Adult Intervention Diversion Project The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract extension with James F_ Austin, Consultant, for evaluation of the Adult Intervention-Diversion Project from September 30, 1976 to December 31, 1976, at an additonal cost not to exceed $800. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the du-:e aforesaid. Orig- Probation Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Probation Officer `upavism Attn: W. C. Donavan, Jr. affixed thiRSth day of_ September 1976 Contractor c/o Probation Officer County Auditor-Controller l .J. R. Ot SSON, Clerk County Administrator By r ` e Deputy Clerk Moryfflffig C;;" 00351 BRS H-24 3/76 25m i CCC Standard Form May 1974 EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SERVICES Contra Costa County 1. Contract Identification: Number 35023-316-732-2310 Department: Probation Subject: Evaluation of Adult Intervention Diversion Program Effective Date: October 1, 1976 2. Parties: The County of Contra Costa, California (County) for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Name: James F. Austin, Consultant Address: 2049 Oak Street, Apt. al, San Francisco, CA 94117 3. Extension of Term: The term of the above described contract between the parties hereto is ereby extended from September 30, 1976 to December 31, 1976 , unless sooner terminated as provided in said contract. 4. Pavment Limit: As to the extended term of the contract, the maximum amount payable by the' County is increased by the following amount S 800.00 5. Other Provisions: As to the term during which the above described contract is extended, a parties mutually agree to those Special Provisions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 6. Signatures: These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR Qgy J. P. Kenny By !* C'" h n, Board oAk Sup r isors rr Attest: County Clerk COy3TL7�c� Designate official capacity in business and affix corporation seal) By Deputy M Cray /— State of California } ss. County of Contra Costa ) JENDED OR AP VAC: 'ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) The person signing above for Contractor ' known to me in those individual and COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/they signed it and that the corpora- By. *WL'M4�a tion or partnership named above executed COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of APPROVED AS TO FORM: County Counsel directors. BY Dated: _�?-r 194P DEPUTY / Deput Coun C erk UU355 Microfilmed with boars a: M SPECIAL PROVISIONS Number 35023-316-732-2310 Contractor agrees to provide all necessary data for the final evaluation report 'of the Adult Intervention Diversic:. Project, Funds provided will be used to perform the activities necessary for the termination of the project as described below: a) Code all closed files; bj Computer process all data; c) Conduct interviews with staff from Probation, District Attorney, Adult Intervention Diversion Project and San Pablo Police. Funds also include costs directly applicable to the preparation of the final report which includes writing, typing, and reproduction costs. Initials: _ Co tractor P De ar 00355 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976, In the Matter of Authorizing Execution of a One Year Lease with Neighborhood House of North Richmond, Inc. for the Premises at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a one year lease commencing September 1, 1976 with Neighborhood House of North Richmond, Inc. for the premises at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond, for continued occupancy by the Health Department, Vector Control Project. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors axed this 28thday of September__, T9 76 cc: County Auditor-Controller affixed Public Works Real Property . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Lessor (via R/P) By y�'lI , Deputy Clerk Buildings & Grounds Health Department County Administrator 0035-1 H-24 3/7615m 5 3i LEASE 305 Chesley Avenue Richmond, CA 94801 HEALTH DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 1. Parties.effective on SEP 2 8 1976, NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC., hereinafter called LESSOR, and the COUNTY•OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter called COUNTY, mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Lease of Premises: LESSOR, in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, hereby leases to COUNTY, and COUNTY hereby hires from LESSOR, approximately 900 square feet of office space in the building commonly known as the Neighborhood House at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801. Said leased office area is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto-and made a part hereof. 3. Term and Extension: A. The term of•this agreement is for one year commencing September 1, 1976, and ending August 31, 1977. B. COUNTY may extend this lease for one (1) year commencing September 1, 1977, and ending August 31, 1978, upon the same terms and conditions by providing LESSOR with written notice at least thirty (30) days' prior to the termination of this lease. 4. Holding Over: Any holding-over after the initial term will be on a month-to-month basis under the same terms and conditions. During the holding-over period, the agreement may be terminated by either party by giving the other party thirty (30) days' prior written notice of said termination. Notice to LESSOR shall be to Executive Director, Neighborhood House, 321 Alamo Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801. Notice to COUNTY shall be to Real Property Division, Public Works Department, 5th Floor, Administration Building, Martinez, CA 94553. -1- OU35� • Microfilmed with (ward order 5. Rental: COUNTY agrees to pay to LESSOR as rent the monthly rental sum of Two-Hundred Fifty and No/100 Dollars ($250.00) in advance, on the 10th day each month. Payments are to be sent to LESSOR at 321 Alamo Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801. 6. Use of Leased Premises: The premises shall be used during the term hereof for the operation of a COUNTY office. 7. Utility Systems: LESSOR shall furnish and maintain any and all electri- cal,lighting, water,•plumbing, heating and ventilating systems in good working order. 8. Utilities and Janitorial Services: LESSOR shall pay for all utilities, r janitorial and refuse collection services provided to the leased premises. 9. Maintenance and Repairs: LESSOR shall maintain the interior and exterior of the building and all the grounds in good order, condition and repair, including all exterior doors and their fixtures, closures and hinges. 10. Minor Alterations, Fixtures, and Signs: COUNTY may make lawful and proper minor alterations, attach fixtures and signs in or upon the.premises, which shall remain COUNTY's property and may be removed therefrom by COUNTY prior to the termination of this lease. 11. Hold Harmless: It is understood and agreed that LESSOR shall not in any way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises while said persons are on COUNTY business, and shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whomsoever while in or upon said leased premises during said term in conjunction with the performance of COUNTY business; and COUNTY hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said leased premises, except, in the case of structural, mechanical, or other failure of equipment or building owned by LESSOR, which results in damage to any person or property, LESSOR will be held liable. LESSOR agrees to hold COUNTY completely harmless from damages to persons or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim, or suit for damages to the person or property when and if said persons or property are passing through, are in or around said demised premises, and are not acting in conjunction with COUNTY business. -2- 00359 12. Destruction: If these premises or any essential part thereof be des- troyed by fire, earthquake, or other casualty, this lease shall, in the case of total or substantial destruction, immediately terminate; and, in case of partial des- truction or damage, shall terminate at the option of either party on giving written notice to the other party within fifteen (15) days after such fire or casualty, and no rent shall accrue or be'payable to LESSOR after such termination. Should COUNTY or LESSOR not elect to terminate said lease as provided in this paragraph, LESSOR shall forthwith repair the premises, and if such partial destruction shall prevent COUNTY from occupying the whole or a portion of the demised premises, COUNTY shall be entitled to a proportionate reduction of the said rent from the date of such partial destruction until the date the demised premises shall be repaired by LESSOR. 13. Quiet Enjoyment: LESSOR covenants that COUNTY shall at all times during the said term peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the demised premises with- out suit, trouble or hindrance from or on account of LESSOR as long as COUNTY fully performs hereunder. 14. Defaults: In the event of COUNTY breach of any of the covenants or con-. ditions herein, including rental payment, LESSOR may re-enter and repossess the premises and remove all persons and property therefrom; and in the event- of such a breach by LESSOR, COUNTY may quit the premises without further obligation or may pro- ceed to repair the building or correct the problem resulting from the breach and deduct the cost thereof from rental payments due LESSOR. 15. Surrender of Premises: On the last day of the said term, or sooner termination of this lease, COUNTY will peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures (except signs and fixtures referred to in Section 10 herein) in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by act of God, or by circumstances over which COUNTY has no control excepted. 16. Successors, Assigns, Sub-Leases: The terms and provisions of this lease shall extend to and be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the executors, -3- J { administrators, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto: COUNTY shall : not assign this lease nor sublet all or any part of these premises nor permit the use thereof by anyone other than COUNTY, such sublessees, and their officers,.agents and employees, without LESSOR's consent first had and obtained. " 17. Inspection: LESSOR reserves the right to enter the premises between the • hours of 9:00 a.m. and 4;30 p.m., Monday through Friday, unless in an emergency situ ation, and to employ- the proper representative to insure that the property is being reasonably cared for, that no waste is being made, and that all things are done in the manner best calculated for the preservation of the property, and in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. 18. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE of each and all of the terms and provisions of this lease. LESSEE LESSOR COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA By: Kenny Exe utive irector By: o s P• NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE,"INC. rman, Board of Super 'sors ATTEST: James R. Ols lerk By: Deputy Mary Gqs RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: County Adminigtrator Deputy' Pub is Works Di or Buildings and Grounds By: ea Property Agent APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel Deputy, ounty Counsl) - 4 - 01361 EXHIBIT "A" PST' P/loJee 7- 3o5 3os Cies -- - ' - - - EF"'-f Rj _. AR£A —_ •_- ___ --- .._...._.. .___- I.�------/��s� � -- --- _ S�fG_ off'. N�:� !l�o,Q�ioo.� .l�o�►ser .-- . ---- - OFF/GE S�ife / G'�r,.c��PP�C� •�iys -5�- - _Wa*m Awv �PesI.&Poww cz "6w ---- - _ au,�r„� yes �y i��aR.,, s�►S�, • . . __ . ._ --- 00362 ..�ti��y`ti'\'�<'-�4.1��_`^!M\� ^. "�_::'A��a'�_-v.:.T..�=-•��-.•e:�:�^�.+.R:��..C.'�Cr'..yam.: :y......i'.:'�-rs 7••'� �v-•'-': ��`k•••� �^1. } In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Termination of Reimbursement Agreement Dan Heath On recommendation of the County Auditor-Controller -IT IS BT THE BDARD ORDERED THAT the Chairman IS HERBY AUTHORIZED to execute Termination of Reimbursement Agreement which was taken to guarantee repayment of the cost of services rendered by the County to Dan Heath whn has made repayment in full. sassed by the Board on Heptenber 28, 1976. in N I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originating Devi; Auditor-Control-ler Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September, Ig 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By_- -,22 _ Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 • 15-M AWCraig tti r- TERMINATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT The REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT and NOTICE OF LIEN executed on August ll, 1961 by Dan Heath and recorded in the official records in the office of the County Recorder of this County on August 21, 1961 in Volume 3'35 at page 23 is hereby released. i Dated: September 28, 1976 By order of the Board of Supervisors. ItW IAN OF THE OF VISORS Contra Costa C ty STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Contra Costa On (date) Sent mb r R- 1076 before me, tdary Cri4y a deputy county clerk of this county, personally appeared ,Tames P. Kenny known to me to be the person who subscribed this instrument and to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of this County and acknow- ledged that he executed it. Janes R. Olsson, County Clerk r by �> DepW Count erk 00361 (K 2029 11/72) Microfilmed with board order IFr In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia September 28 , 19 76 , In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to execute Consultant Contract with Mrs. Maria Diaz to serve as Parent Assistant to ; the Head Start Program Speech Patholog- ist 10/4/76-6/7/77 and authorize pay- ment of mileage at the rate of 15C per mile: not to exceed a total of 5420.00 The Chairman of the Board is hereby AUTHORIZED to execute a Consultant Contract with Mrs: Maria Diaz, San Pablo, California, to serve as Parent Assistant to the Head Start Speech Pathologist October 4, 1976-June 7, 1977 and authorize payment of mileage at the rate of 15¢ per mile; not to exceed a total of $420.00. APPROVED BY THE BOARD September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid Ori g. Dept.: OEO Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this 28th day of September, 19 76 Head Start C/o OEO _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor c/o OEO By aeg., Deputy Clerk aig 0036 H 24 8/75 10M ` ,.............._._....�..�..... ...i�::r�..,.lam, .._..: . r„. l� :•!;-.-�,.:: Office of Economic Opportunity - Head Start Parent Assistant to Head Start Speech Pathologist ?, 'rri_a: . C.r.ri7y of Contra Ct1:.t.t, C�iE:-%:hhia (County), for its Depart.:.ent named ibove.•, ai:.t. L.'I_ named Contractor .'!gree and promise ar, follOwS: t Ct.:tractor: Mrs. Maria Diaz Cir;ac L=y: Individual Contractor Address: 1922 Market Avenue, San Pablo, CA 94806 3. Te:-n. data of this Cuntr:-ct is October 4, 1976 and it June 7,-1977 _ 11::::.:s .:._r-_ nat:d ay Prov Lded 4. Termination. ':his Contract may be terolaaLed lay the County, at its sole eiscretion, upon five-day ad---anca written notice thereof to the Contractor, or cancelled i.rediately by written tautuai ccnsent. 3. Yaynent Uni.. Couuty's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 2-576 6. County's Oil_zac:ons. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-15) and upon approval of such deeand by the head of the Couacy Department for which t::-13 Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: (x) hour; or FEE rUNTE: $ 4 per service unit: ( ) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month). \OT TO EXCEED i total of 644 service urit(s). 7. Contractor's O:+linations. Contractor shad provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in language assessment of Spanish' speaking children in Head Start; assist in the development and implementation of appropriate parent education projects and the development and implementation of Spanish language related materials and activities for County selected persons in the time, place, and manner required by the County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. S. Independent Contractor Status_ This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is rot intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for dammages for death, sickness j_ -injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential da:_-gas, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected witih the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or ot::—_se, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or enplo;eas, or any other person or entity. 10. I ntho:'_t:-. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the folio ring legal sut-horLties: California Government Coee Sections 26227 and 31000. 11. SL;n_ttura:�. =!•.ese signatures.attest the parties` agreement hereto: COUNT-1 0” CON'770, e'^aT\, C\LUORILA COST4:1CTOZ *5rimiiin, I P. Kenny syBoard o Sup^ 'cors nc�sibn�r ..•fir•:aTtr,�:�c?:ori =1;r _. *�:"r'i�•n!' � - ��[� li:`aigae� lt'OC3! approved UV r.JUIhC� h.J!:itS: ties . ;: ;,�1.._�lz;) _ _...ds= - -- • _ - _M►C�1(me�cL�vi#h.:bo0rel -.ogler. . _, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 14 76 In the Matter of Agreement with AEP Associated for Consulting Services IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with AEP Associates for consulting services to prepare an environmental impact report for Subdivision 14881 in the Orinda area, at a cost not to exceed $1850 under terms and conditions as set forth in said agreement. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Supervisors AEP Associates c/o Planning wed this 28thday of September 1976 Director of Planning County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OISSON, Clerk BDeputy Clerk Mevcraig 00367 H•24 3/76 15m CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMEN'r 1. Special Conditions. These special conditions are incorporated below by reference: (a) Consultant's Name and Address: AEP Associates, 1620 North Main Street, Walnut Creek, California 94596 (b) Effective Date: SEI' 2 9 1976 (c) Project Name. Number and Location: Environmental Impact Report for Subdivision Application No. 4881,Orinda, California. (d) Payment Limit: One Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars($1,850.00) 2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties'agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CONSU ')'ANT ,B BY J' t hairman, loarl of J Kenny Designate-official capacit m business Supervisors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSO , (CORPORATESEAQ County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Board State of California ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By: z� Ue&,' The person(s)signing above for Consultant, known Deputy. ary 1 to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknow- Recolmended W: ledged that he/they signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. Anthon . ehaesus Date:— DirectcJr of Planning / Form approved: ■I,Illlltt,tllltt Blt� a�lirmnnunw John B. Clausen = D� OFFICIAL srAt. County Counsel ° ;ro'� -� '�T11�yG511/'X-kVq ���C )' F'" dY PUBLIC—CALII ORIIIA Iit%t/'ri'� �!///1����� +t-••" COUNTY OF CGNTRA CCiTA r,[tndsusn[•7Mto Gctr Yr 16.1lJ6 BY= i,trnnumnnu�lulntl::aululuw.uu::Luuuu� Deputy ol 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, Contra Costa County and the above-named onsultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. County hereby employs Consultant,and Consultant accepts such employment o per orf he professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of Service shall be as described in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to the County, furnish certificates or other ev Ucnce acceptable to the County of (a) public liability insurance of at least $500,000.00 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000.00 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $500,000.00. Thirty days' notice to County of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. The County shall pay Consultant for professional services performed as follows: A. For preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report a fee not to exceed One Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Dollars($1,650.00)payable in installments as follows: (i) The first installment, in an amolft to be determined by the Director of Planning of not more than 50% ($825.00) nor less than 30% ($495.00) of the fee noted in 7.A. above, shall be paid after receipt by the County of the"Working Draft" report. (ii) The second installment, constituting the remainder of the fee noted in 7.A. above,shall be paid after the Director of Planning receives and finds acceptable the"Final Consultant Draft". nn ff MaoiHm d vrith boar,l0 4%s B. For preparation of responses to comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report n fee not to exceed Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) chargeable at the rate of Twenty- Five Dollars ($25.00) per hour. Consultants statement of charges shall be submitted after acceptance of the responses to comments by the County. C. Ten percent(10%) of all charges billed by the Consultant shall be withheld until final acceptance of the Final Environmental Impact Report by the appropriate hearing body or until authorized by the Director of Planning, whichever comes first. D. The fees specified in Sections 7.A. and 7.8. include all overhead and incidental expenses for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. in no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the fee limit specified in Section 1(d) without prior written approval of the County. 8. Termination. At its option, County may terminate this agreement at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination Consultant agrees to deliver to the County everything pertaining to the work in the possession of Consultant or under its control at that time, and will be paid, except as provided below, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due for services rendered to the date of termination. If the Consultant is in default at the time of termination, County may complete the work (scope of service) and deduct the reasonable expenses thereof from the fee and from any funds otherwise due and payable to the Consultant. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not to be considered an emp ogee of the County. 10. Exclusive Services. Consultant agrees to restrict its firm and its subcontractors from any employment, offier than for the County, in any way pertaining to the subject of this. employment or to the proposed project which this report will review, for a period of two years after the effective date of this agreement without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such employment. Consultant further agrees to insert this condition into all contracts or work agreements with is subcontractors. 11. Status of Product. It is understood that the Final Consultant Draft accepted by the County will utilized as background or source material by the Planning Department for its exclusive use, all or in part,as it sees fit. The Consultant agrees not to release,disclose or otherwise make available copies of its written documents, their contents, any views or opinions contained therein, or any other written or oral material, data, views, opinions or other information in any way arising out of or connected with the subject of this employment to other than the Planning. Department without first obtaining the prior written consent of the Director of Planning for such disclosure. Attachment.. Appendix A 00369 APPENDIX"A" Consultant shall prepare a report analyzing environmental impact in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and County guidelines. The report shall be prepared in the format specified by the County. It shall be single spaced and suitable for duplication by office copier methods. The Consultant shall prepare the report in a Working Draft form initially and submit three. (3) .copies for Planning Department review within twenty-one (21) calendar days of authorization by the County to proceed with report preparation. After Planning Department reviews and comments on the Draft. the Consultant shall revise'the Working: Draft report in accordance with such comments and submit one copy of a Final Consultant Draft for review and acceptance by the Planning Department within seven(7)calendar days of receipt of the edited Working Draft. Assistance of County staff required by the Consultant in the gathering of data to complete this report shall be limited to supplying of source documents on County premises. No compiling of data will be done by County staff. All otfier County staff support effort will be limited to that specifically enumerated below: None. The provisions of this contract shall terminate 180 days after execution by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 00370 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Agreement #29-209-1 with the State Department of Health To Provide Funding for the County's Community Demonstration Rat Control Program in Richmond for FY 1976-77 IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Contract #29-209-1 with the State Department of Health (State Number 76-55714) to provide $164,924 in funding from the State for the Community Demonstration Rat Control Program operated by the County Health Department in Richmond from July 1, 1976, through June 30, 1977, and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said agreement. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts S Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this28thday of September , 19 76 County Auditor-Controller County Health Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk State Dept. of Health By ' i Deputy Clerk Marrocig 003'71 i - awovEo ar TME.• F4:.`.1 s1P:.131"Irl) �;'_ `,-•,�e:"� ❑ CONTRACTOR StA COF.CA AGREEMENT— ATAtSTATICrowNE�cENEw.L lei :8 C::U�•• CWaitt ❑ STATCAacNCT lTTE OR•C A4 FORMA !T0. a {REV. 11/731 fr N�i - ❑ OEor.OF GEN.SER. ❑ CONTROLLER rHIS AGREEMENT.made and entered into this 15th day of Jure , I936—. ❑ is the State of California,bs and between Stare of California,through its duly elected of appointed. ❑ qualified and acting ❑ TITLE O=OFFICER ACT:NG FOR STATEAGENCY NUMRER ssis..ant Chlie-r' .j�.e•...jal ?'o�:a-v-•ar.= -...nr,nn ^a-1ow�.•nTL nr r=o�7'f'ii 16-SSIa•4 s herroitw Called L11 a State.and -- -- -- _ 29 . 209- 1 _ Contra Costa Co-an_.,: for its Health Department hereafter tatted the Contractor. T+IlaIESSETH:That the Contractor fa:and in ea-.sideration of the ca•enants,conditions,agreements,and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed,does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials,as follows: (Set farms service to he meted by Coattxmr.amount to be putd Contractor.tsar for pefomup:e or cmpletiva.and attracts pians and spoci(icagons,if tay.l _ Tile Contractor 's..=7 carry out the follower tern of the contract: • 1. The conduct of the Co-...unity Demonstration 3_t Control Program in Richmond shall conforn to the objectives of the program as set forth in the program* proposal. The attached Exhibit "Sial entitled Pro-posal a^i consisting of 9 pages is rade a part hereof by this reference. 2. The attached Exhibit "Bt1 entitled Budget and consisting of 2 pages is rade a part hereof by this reference. 3. The preparation of qt a--teriy status reports sit conform to the guidelines of the Department c_ Health, Education and Welfare, U.S. Public Health Service. A tapir of these guidelines, consisting of 6 pages, entitled Exhibit "C" is rade a part hereof by this reference. he suit=fission of three (3) copies of each quarterly report to the State Fealth Den=r>,ent, Vector Control Section's Regio-al Hat Control-Project Office, 2151 Berkeley :ray, Berkeley, CA 94704 shall be —e on or before the 10th day following r the close of each reporting peried_ f (Continued on Page 2) - The pmvisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement. W RTT\ESS WHEREOF,this agteemint has been executed by the parties hereto.upon the date first above written. STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR AGENCY co"YRAe TOR 11►orzw Th"A.Iw•mwowAL,ti.Te. zrwte A Cowroeailow .A.Tf.c.t.o,cra.I Demar'annt of Fealt1+ Co_ gra Costa County for its Health Department 1 BY tAUT14CRILE0 SIGNATURE1 BT l Y NOR12E0 SI TY 1 i it. _ entry i TITLE Assl2nt C,ief T L F'financial esrent Branch Chairtan, BoardZJapervisors Aoowcs 1651 Pine Street Lol 1co.vtnuam ON�S.EE 7S. Enc. eEAwING NAuE Or CoNrw ACTOo1 ?-Tortiggz, CA oLqqj 1 Deportment of General.Se";CeS nwOUN T ENCUMonREO APPRO7R1Ar10N riealth and f FUND t(!e ONLY S-164,9241— _ 4R£P a 09 P.H. Federal Fund - I YNENCUMBSREO BALANCE 27c" CN AFTER STATUTES FISCAL YEAR S 1970 1976-77 J .y.I.C.t...%t C\CYYF.YCC FUNCTION I r$2cftE7ATUHC_!1'OV /t.CYr..A�Ct LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT 809-765-�-� 1 y w,1tw my own T.0.4.NO. B.R.NO. . iwtlml LnhwlrllRlr shoe 6urlter.IrJ fund or I&t pert Imd pur wsr of the rrn:adlture stntnf at., r ACCOUNTING OFFICER O.TE s I tN•nrby certify that all taeldrtnes for rsrmptlnn wst forth in State rldmiaistrativa 197Y hate been LYrplini with Imd this damum nt is ranmpt Into review by eha+UlryFsrtmer1:n(Fim nrat. SICNATUwE OFOtt Accw soGNING ON BEMALF OF TNC AGENCY OArt --`-"— - - L The Contractor agrees to indemnify,defend and save harmless the State, its officers,agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, `-- subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services,irmterials or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person,firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Contractor in the performance of this contract. o The Contractor. and the agents and employers of Contractor, in the performance of this agg Bement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of State of California- 3. alifornia3. The State may terminate this agreement and be relieved of the payment of any consideration to Contractor should Contractor fail to perform the covenants herein contained at the.time and in the manner herein prodded. In the event of such termination the State may proceed with the work:in any manner deemed proper by the State.The cost to the State shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this agreement, and the balance, if any, shall be paid the Cortractor upon demand. _ A VTrthout the .written consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable by Contractor __•' either in whole or in part. '--_ aTrine is the essence of this agreement 6. \o alteration or striation of the terms of this contrlct shall be valid unless mane in writing and signed by the parties hereto,and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be binding on any of the parties hgreto. _ - -- 7. The consideration to be paid Contractor, as provided herein,shall be in compensation for - all of Contractor's expenses incurred in the performance hereof, including travel and per diem, ----------- unless otherwise expressly so provided 00373 �_-� . 7114 t 1 COUMNC'iOR: Contra Costa County CONRACT NO.: 70'-55714 i 4,. Tne sLb`ssion of a Tmrterly report of program expenditure, by budget item, shall be r--,'e to the State 'Health Department, 'lector Control Section's Regior-I Rat Project Office, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704, not later than 45 days after the end of the reporting period. 5. Two (2) co=rehensive surveys of the Richmond target areas will be performed in accordance with the Urban P.at Control Survey Methodology. A copv of the methodology entitled Exhibit "D" and consisting of six (6) pages is rade a part hereof by this reference. 6. This contract may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice to the other party. 7. The period of the contract shall be from 1 July, 1976 through 30 June, 1977.. 8. The attached E�chibit "A"(S) entitled "Addition Provisions" is made i part hereof by this reference. 9.! In considerzti on of the'above services, performed in a manner acceptable to the State, the State shall rei--burse the contractor quarterly, in arrears, for actual exreaditu_re in accordance with the program budget (xE bit B), anon subm_'ssioa of an invoice by budget item,in triplicate, stating the amount of expenditure and the time period covered. Such reir!:u_rsement �lI be rade provided that the contractor shall_ rot exceed by 2756 or $1,000.00, ahichever.i,s less, aey individual item in the budget, and that the conti-a--tor sig)--it an exul.an-ation of the need for any excess with the clain for reiabursehant; further, the State reserves the right to deny such clain for excess reinburse..:ent on any item. 10. A final invoice shat be submitted by the contractor to the Project Director, Demonstration Rat Control Project, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704 within sixty days after the terri.nation hereof unless delay is authorised, in writing, by the Project Director, Demonstration Rat Control Project, on or before 30 June, 1977. _ 11. The total a=unt parable by the State to the contractor under this contract shall not exceed $164,924. 00374 Exhibi t "A:r Proposal Contra Costa County Contract !#76-55714 t Long Term Objectives: 1. Achieve control of rat populations, infestations, harborages and food supplies on premises within the Richmond tract area by: meeting and maintaining Federal maintenance criteria in at least 80S of the target area blocks. 2. Provide for maxi=um involvement and employment, training and new i career opportunities for the residents of the Richmond target area. 3. Present a ccmarehensive report on the knowledge and insights gained from tike Ri=.:=ond program riences expe ::-tat can 3e formingf utilized in a model program or the county and region. Short Term Objectives: - 1. By July 1, 1977 achieve maintenance in an additional twenty (20) blocks of the North Richmond region of the target area, in- creasing the maintenance percentage from fifty-five to eighty percent. - 2. By October 1, 1976 confirm the existance of at least 80% • "environmentally improved blocks" to begin phase-out of Iron • Triangle and Southside regions. - 3. By July 1, 1977 obtain permanent employment for at least two (2) members of tate field staff in positions appropriate for their program learned skills and training. i 0�Tr Exhibit "A" E r r !t 1976-77 Short Term Obie s�r•r a.i V .{ m -0 y m m b» � tiSr 99 C 0 11 U a ed atm E 01-4 r i Cl •.-1 r3 r- 34 4►d a E- 4 1Oi $4 tt ref S4 Af C �-•� m J V W-.4 c m 0 0r: u C 0� o 41 ox )4'J c-: 0 -4 E 0 H-4= r: O'O.0 O ti r )4 O'O u.-i a ^. ca 0 C N v Id .0 .1 CO 0 �E r 54 x .-t 0 > c �.-LI - 41 #3a� au0m» i 93.4 0304J 0a0E .nE3 DIAJOR ACTI V ITIS$ U V Z 0 W 0.--I H ( 0 O 41 A. FIELD SERVICE ACTIVITIES ( ' 1. Community Education/Home Visits X X 2. Complaint Response X X t 3. Rat Sunoressio:+: -Killing & Poisoning X X i 4. Structural Rat Proofing X X 5. Servicing Litter Containers _ X X � 6. Community Clean-un Complaints _ X X 7. School Presentations X X 8. Civic Group Presentations X X 9. Multi-media Promotion X X 10. In-service Training X X X 3 11. Additional Pesticide Certification X 12. Career Counseling X 13. Rotating Office Coverage X X X - B. FIELD EVALUATION t?CTIVITIES . 14. Comprehensive Sur:-evs X X 15. Cor.nunity advicnry C Meetings X X Ir 17- Animal Trapping 19. Administrative & tusc. (251 or Total) X X X 0U3'73i A Exhibit rrArr i j C. Administrative Evaluation Activities I Activities which enable the manager and other' supervisory personnel to su=arize and analyze the performance of the program and take appropriate action include: a) Work log audit - Periodic random selection of each Vector Controller's cork log to audit listed activities. This will generally involve contacting an individual listed as receiving service or visiting the site of a listed non- personal activity. The quality and quantity of service will then be docuwented and reviewed with staff. This technique will be emploged as the principle evaluation tool for listed activities il, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. b) Special questionnaires - Those attending education presen- tatians :ill periodical!_, he asked to fill out question-. mires that measure attendees subjective opinion or the presentation and also ans::zrs to "pre and post" quizzes to determine effectiveness. This technique will be most appropriate for listed activities :7, 8, 9 and 10. c) Receint of end product - Some activities can only be evaluated by the success or failure to produce the de- sized end product. (For example - career counselling that results in improved level .of employment is successful; certification training that yields certificates is successful; etc.) This method will be utilized to assess listed activities rll, 12, 16 and 17. d) Verification survey - Standard C.D.C. verification survey methodology will be employed to evaluate the comprehen- sive surveys, listed activity M. e) Technical consultation - Specialists from the State Health Department Vector Control Section will assist in the evaluation and verification of prepared ectoparasite , indices, listed activity =18. - f) Subjective management review - The satisfactory performan�„e of administrative and office tasks, listed activities X13and 19, and the effectiveness of community advisory ac- tivities, listed activity 115, can best be judged by the subjective observations of manaaerent and supervisorial staff. - A0377 .. . _ -13- ""7i. Exhibit "Ait U st o A � c O N U rs } a3 z ( q m t c, 43 U' 3i 3r O, t, O ' R3 o ' � O 43 0 v 3» � rs O34 r y .-. • •ri C) ". �•.. O Si C; -.-i o O -V • ... r"�. - N O X r r to 1- •' N u3 c-i O O r-i s� c9 r•i G:t a N m C o a 0 to 0 W rs O :. tsr _ rE 0 ­4 C m F. c U O 0 -4 C c -+-! - -.i -43a -.t O su O zs O to F3' > O Iz w r p, yt •ri O t7 34 U O -ri N q O ,:1 1* 13 -ri O .O C 43 t3' C-3 c t O .-i a O G -+ > v Z r c 3 E O c 34 O O O E •: r-1 O 34 cr -rt o .i r4 U o u o r ^ c3 f; 14 0 C) v .-t J 3•1 0 U t4 E+ >~ U O O c. � rf QN. = -ri rJ @ to 34 N :5 U U q U $4 s� > O -4 U > Sa O p -.i rs O O :z k3± a; CJ 1; O z •V H O -o 3•t 1 U O U tr cz t .c- rr rs CL -.i U f: y 0 -4 ul 11 34 3= .0 r O -. U E 0 i :3 t 41 r ..i •ri a to . a O tr k U U .-i r- rs U 4-1 C q U 43 ."3 U U :•s +i o -4 :3 H U ra z +i r i W O k N .t kt O E �. V �." U -ri 'R-.' O q :3 O M •33 U +i G7 q 3a U C 33 3r r _ C? '*t v t?t O 43 U 'Cf r -.i s~ O 9z U H > O 21 •ri U E ri C3 •V t f U V rs t� U ri -4 34 ' d V to 4j a CJ $4 -r1 rpt V 43 '3 t7 U V > C3 f. q e 33 10 U -14 -V4 -ri U r•i .rt V s4 .V •V .14 $4 > +Oi a� W W Q -rt W .q -•-t p to O > O O 04 _ E4 Exhibit "A" RICHM-OND U:'9.:Nr P4ii CO_`iTrOL PROGRAM Demonstration Area titin R7 i1 =: RICIi�..oxr� Marin —1_-° :� O Richmond N. SF '- 1 Pacific Ocean • _��JiLj f 'y i'. 1 •�� `��� Vicinity Map Ji 11 IRO\ ^; �. TRIANGLE ' lk moi=-�L _ L21 lj"—LJ- .�_��•� �_;�--fir• �.� J -'_-�+_�1-���' \ i 1(_�Uj j ? KSOUTH SIDE` iLM�it���� !�""�"��•-�_D�' �t I� �� i'�:i�. hut) �al-h Department Contra Contra Costa County 1 1 v Human Resources Agency Heakb-Mediat•Soeial Servie+ Orlyn H..Vood,M.D. Costa CL..d.t Va"Marter lie.ith Officer Director `` Courcy Exhibit ".A!' f J'_41 August 12, 1976 Earl W. ?:ortenson, Director Regional and Community Demonstration Rat Control Project State Health Department 2151 Berkeley Way Berkeley, CA 94704 Dear Mr. Mortenson: This letter and enclosures are in response to your request of July 12, 1976 for additional information relative to the Richmond Rat Control Project plans for Fiscal Year 1976-1977_ Item by item, these include: • 1_ Request for a detailed map of the redesigned target area, identifying environmentally improved blocks - The enclosed map and block list includes those blocks that can be con- sidered as "Environmentally Improved" according to our latest survey findings. As 67% of the Southside Area and 65% of the• Iron Triangle Area are environmentally improved blocks, it is anticipated that enough of the remaining blocks can be improved by the time of the next survey to eliminate the entire Southside and Iron Triangle from the target area by December 31, 1976_ 2_ Request for a plan of action for utilizing local resources to nairtain environmentally improved blocks - As these areas are eii._reiy within the city limits of cre City O=" Richmond, the city council and city manager will be advised of the decreasing levels of federal, state and county assistance available. The county is prepared to provide educational and code enforcement activities within the area and the city will be expected to participate with environ- mental improvement/community development activities. 3. Request for provision of semi-annual surveys of the environmentally improved area - The environmentally improved blocks will be surveyed twice each year, at the time of the scheduled comprehensive inspections. Please reply or call: 00380 Administrative Offices Pittsburg Office Richmond Office Pleasant Hill Office P.O,Sot 871 • 45 Civic Avenue 100 37th Street 85 CleaveLmd Road Martinez-t-witornia 945s,, Pittsburg-California 94555 Richmond,California 94805 Pleasant Hilt,California 94523 (415)372-2501 (415)438-8222 (415)233.7060 (415)937-4100 i Exhibit "A" Earl Mortenson -2- August 12, 1976 4- Request for a description of the planned use of code enforce- ment in the target area - Code enforcement activities will continue to be handled by the Contra Costa County Environ- mental Health Division personnel in the Richmond Area field office. This local ordinance and Health and Safety Code Enforcement is by contract with the City of Richmond for incorporated areas, and under statutory authority for county areas. The Contra Cost` County Health Department is unable to make comaitments for rcreased local funding, but remains pledge, to advocate comprehensive environmental improvement and rat control services_ In response to your final comment, the only ecto- parasite activities to involve project personnel will be limited training and career da-velopment activities_ It is hoped that this letter provides the necessary infor- mation for you to continue with the contract operations. If further assistance is required, feel free to contact this office or Program Manager Mel Knight. Sincerely, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT Orlyn H. Flood, M.D. Health Officer OHW:MZK:11 Enclosures cc: ILI Knight Files 00381. Exhibit nArr RIC&MOND URfWN RAT CONTROL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTALLY IMPROVED BLOCF;S August 1976 i 00381. Exhibit reArr RICILMONJD URfWN RAT CONTROL PROJECT ENVIRON.°3ENITALLY IMPROVED BLOCKS August 1976 NORTH RT_CIDIOND IRON TRIANiGLE SOUTHSIDE 1 2 86 158 5 91 156 3 10 87 159 6 92 157 10 11 88 160 7 93 158 16 12 89 161 8 95 159 17 18 90 162 13 96 160 21 19 91 163 17 97 161 30 21 92 20 99 162 33 23 93 21 101 163 40 25 94 23 102 165 42 27 95 25 103 166 43 29 97 27 104 167 44 30 99 28 106 168 51 31 104 30 107 169 57 33 105 31 109 170 58 34 106 33 110 171 60 37 107 34 111 172 63 39 108 37 112 173 64 42 109 38 114 176 67 43 110 39 115 177 68 44 111 43 116 178 69 47 112 44 117 179 71 48 113 45 118 180 72 50 114 46 119 182 75 51 115 49 120 184 77 55 116 50 121 78 56 117 51 125 79 57 118 57 126 80 58 123 59 127 59 125 61 128 TOTAL 28 60 126 62 129 61 127 63 130, 62 129 64 131 66 130 66 132 67 131 69 133 68 133 70 134 69 135 71 135 70 136 72 136 71 137 73 137 72 138 74 13875 73 139 75 140 - 74 141 76 142 75 142 77 143 76 143 79 147 79 145 80 148 80 146 (' 81 150 81 147 00382 82 151 82 154 83 152 83 155 84 153 84 156 86 154 85 157 90 155 TOTAL 106 TOTAL 124 �„l.^+^�:lt;" ` ul ref ��� _ •, oleo jt 11 T t 1,�";� 1'i7 t'�Vii.`�✓ ''. `�:. M + 1f�4V l••.���1'J�tr:''"� `.-•��� rl re MR -F'� 1 ` \ -� �,l.t ,;;}���!•�.� ..-fir t�,y/� `/�l'i" r v-' �� �•,. .� � /�Str- ' E �•X,�=�+✓'i�,r�i'�/�'�„j��� l i/''�'�''-"" ('r�Ij�i..r+ ��'1� ' �y^�� r,•�•-�.. 11 /r r'"�h:�7�!'`'%'•���"•;�f1lJ�tv�,. � `i'-` ftp t�"�� �") ��� ��11 Al -rI-A- Al •1��6 ,ZmpL ova $loots 1 - Exhibit 11311 Budget Contra Costa Fount;/' _BUDGET ��,...,, 5_ To Al.Y. 1-71'!Hil y Svc 0^ FF TS County L o-he_-- Revuest.�^ ' from. ' State 1 Program Manager 0.5 $11584 $ 9,504 1• Account Clergy 1.0 3.,055 - - - _ 12,660 2 Lead Vector Controllers 1.0 1,164 27,936 6- Vector Controllers 1.0 1,056 76,032 _ -- Thtal Salaries and- es 8,657 126,132 ..Staff B_ne_its (a3tte 17, 1,LT2 21,442. • _,�_ 10,328 17,5 4 ^ 4 6 Exhibit er3rt Contra Costa CoLnt-v - Rich-mond - •Zbta1-Salaries an ;;des 8,657 126,232 Staff B_ne_its (?w:e 17 1,472 -21,442 TOTAL PEPtSO: L S_:?1--CSS 10,129 1479574 j . 10381. Exhibit "B" Contra Costa Cocnty - Richncnd .. BG'-X:' (Cant_ OP�"^T'r - - _> "� •rJ_ SOUaC7- 07 ;':�S t COEL•itj Ze. =SLe� Other sroa _ - S=z`e 1,200 tea,�?, ��t e -• 4 - - ,400 Trzvcil %at e 1.,200 - ,;u 8-50 •3,300 - Print:rz 1,000 Supplies - 3,000-. W=txacts 1T,350'.. . 7,30• - .ibtal D-4-e C'Ya_,es . • ' -- - Srris-ect Chz�,es _ - . .. . 3UT�. BGS - • - : . - F YRiiFt ' •. Exhibit "C" Guidelines, Quarterlj'Status Repor Contra Costa County Contract #76-55714 ' D.P.•L�% C^ _sz-i! rji'�=iii:f. r'••; %.e.�ntiC U-NMER F0= DISEASE-- MMML SIM-CAU 10^ STA:.. SF ti L�=S MAIUM SERVICES G171S[-::: 71,:SIaCCTiG1:S - M.-,0. *'33.3:CF (Fora CDC 7.15) Lich Frc;cct will submit to the Regional Cersilt:rt for Lr,:riro.:-=ctA Health Ser-,Ices a re'.ArterlL renort CII Frogram acticiri_s 4h-;ch L•_I: Cls..=ist of two rants: (1} a statistical section on the for.:_ pr evUed and (Z) a brief The ;uarzerly rc=o+'.t is i.^.tcuied to per='_t evaluation of Project p roarass, and to i%rov;-:e izfor-•tion for preparation o: periodic states reper:s. It Is essential that inform=tion be supplied exactly as reque ted. There should be no s-:bsti;tut!c=s or char.-es in tha categories c; inforr ati7^, except �.. t!:= narratIve report. T:^n cc2ies of the report are to be received at the Fed:cr.:i o=fic- b, ti-e 15t:: day fellcrAng the end of the r••+rtrrly reporting nerand cae copy forwarded by the Regional office to the Center for Disease C_•:_rci b; the 23tu day follce irg the e::-1 of the ep:art:_ly reoo_trn:,- period, re.poccirrg acco_plish eats of the preceding 3 nan=::s. Detailed irstructirrs for coniletiro ?orn CDC 7.15 are as folie.-;: 1. i=nject Id_ntificat;on _im1er - iais item refers to the nu=bur assiaz4 to the ;project by tie Regional Cffice in the Notice of (,rant Award. 2. Quarteriv Per'_ad :ndinr, - Enter the last day of the final aorta of the apprapria=e tisartPr; for c::c-�Ie, : rcis 31, 1975. r.. :......... _ ........ .. ._ Exhibit "C" 2 3_ Date - Enter the cute on ::;rich the report was co:;.plcted for submission to the Regional Cffice. 4. Completed Iv. - Enter the nare of the person who prepared the report. If other than the project director, the project director should place his initials following the nare. 5. Ancn-.y and address - Eater the namz of the agency conducting the rat control program, and the name of the program city and State. The report for a State program will be made up of the irdi:•idcsl reports from each participating city accompanied by a cover letter. It. addition, the State program office will provide a brief state- neat on progress for the State Erant based. on its short range objectiveA_' 6. Tau=t Area Stags - Enter the nave anal/or number of each target area. If a program has more than five target areas, it will be necessary to complete target area status information on additional forms. A. Nunher of Blocks - Record the total number of blocks in each target area. (1) Pre_ttack - Eat,,:r t:2 rnz;b_r of blocks in the preattack phase for each target area. B2oc'r_s in this phase are those in a target area in which no direct activity has begun. althouSb residents living in these blocks may be- exposed eexposed to the mss media informational effort directed at areas in the attz_'r_ phase. Some preliminary planning- 0038*7 b em=it IVI 3 for future attack activities may take place during this phase. (2) Attack - Fnter the nucber of blocks in the attack. phase for each target area. This is the period of caxi=mum progra^ activity is a target w'ea. Co=preaensive surveys on a prer?ses-by-pre.ises basis are conducted to delineate i the problem areas and their deficiencies, and furnish inforuation on whit', to base intensive control Lcasures r designed to kill rats, improve refuse storage, clear prenises of rat harborage, and enforce sanitary codes. i (3) Maintenance - Enter the nu._ber of blocks in the maintenance phase for each target area. For reporting purposes, at the i end of each quarter, blocks are placed in the maintenance phase only if survzy data indicate that 2 vercent or less of the rrewises have active extericr rat sit.-as and either . ? (1) 15 percent or less cf theyrcmises have exposed rarbaze, i a or (2) 30 varcert or less of the Premises have uranarovad t _ refuse sterace. Target area blocks should be placed in the i maintenance phase en an individual basis. It is strongly i t urged, however, that maintenance areas be :s homogenuous as i possible. :'wps illustrating the three vaases described above t must be attached. i IIn some projects, the interior rat populations may he independent of, and may eonstitutz -- brewer -:cbl_._ t`an the ext__:or Population. If ius i situation does exist, sur-le;s s`:nuld be made tc pro ide information on the extent of interior infestation and corrective action should be conducted. Co=pilation and analysis of su:h data should be i.zcluded in the narrative statement. 09 0$ i Exhibit :rCs' 4 B. Number of Prerises - This item refers to the estimated total number of premises in each target area. C. huwbe; of D•elline Cuts - Record the total nurber of duelling i units in each target area. D. Estirated Population. - This item refers to the estimated population_ in each target area. E. Pat Rites - Report the nuaher of rat bites that have been confirmed by project personnel or other qualified individuals for each target area. F. Pat Co:r.►laints - P.eport the number of rat complaints received for each target area. This does not include complaints about mouse and insect infestations. 7. Rat Bites (City-ride) - City-vide data include those fro. the target areas and other parts of the city. 8. rat Conn aiat_ (City-Wide) - City-:ride complaints include those from the target areas and from other areas within the city lisits. 9. Estimated City-1-14-de Pcnulzticns - This item refers to the total population in the city including the population in the target area. 10. t?ealth Education Activities A. Number of Talks Presented - Enter the number of formal presentations and speeches made by project staff to civic organizations, bloc's clubs, school assemblies, or other groups. B. Number of People reached - Enter the estimated total number of persons in the previous item. For presentations to primary and secondary school children and to college students, enter nur.ber u:-ere indicated. 00389 a Exhibit acct 5 C. ':ut:aer Off F.-:Iies Cotttact,2d - ::.-ter the :u:rce. c: ts,i ln" vith which individual on-preWices contacts were aadc and educational-=otivational inter-Ie::s accomplished by health educator aides or similar personnel. 11. Project 7-r-lo•:ees - This item includes full-time employees c:ho are. currently working in the approved project target area. List the number of employees hired from target area only in the first column. The second colur-n includes employees hired from. outside of the target area. The third column is the sum of the first and second columns. A. Beginning of Quarter - Enter the total number of these employees as of the first day of the quarter. B. Fired - Enter the number hired during the quarter. C. Subtotal - Add Line A and Line B. D. Seaarated - rater the number separated during the quarter. E. At Er_d of QL=rter - Subtract Line D from Line C. 12. ::arrative Stater_ent - The intent of the narrative statement is threefold. ' 1. It provides an aralvsis of the statistical data contained in time Quarterly Report and related stv ristical resorts (a statistical addendum). It includes analysis of results of co--preheniive and veri°icaticn surveys. The analysis may be a statement that supports the data by illustrating the reasons for significant accomplishments, lack of accomplishments, and/or setbacks. - 001390 - Erhibit "Cn . 6 2. It provides _rt_cl infor^atlon on those elerents of the progr2n not included :n the statistical reports. Information on those ele=ents of the prograa not included in the statistical report may be on i:.proved municipal services, improved citizen . participation and motivation, discussion of innovative t � approaches developed (enumerate under separate subsection), special surveys designed to treasure changes in citizen attitude and behavior, significant career accomplisF�ents of program staff, and proble:s encountered. In addition, describe any ammo=plishments that have been trade to increase project self- sufficiency (i.e., a statement of the governmental, legal, financial, or other efforts of the local program to increase Its ability to maintain rat control activities and improvements with reduced Federal support.) 3. It provides a brief statexent of progress for each of the progr4's short-range objectives on a euarterly basis. Each short-range program objective should be re-stated, followed by a brief statement relating to its status towards accomplishment. The narrative state_enr and a statistical addendum, including sur: ary survey sheets, should be submitted as attachments to the Q_,arterly Report. 13. Re=arks - as necessary, provide remar's that may clarify the statistical data on the fora. 00391 .v... _ ,..�.:•.-...;.:.r, t.w:r.. _ ��..7 Surrey Methodology Contra Costa County Contract #,:7c-55714 LrABAS RAT CO?'?dOL ?=OG�W! 5_3i'_Y "S—I ?OOOLOGY he goal of an Urban ?at Control Pregrar is to reduce rat populations and the causative cc»i-itions suprortive to thea, as defined in the Federal Urban Rat Surae} M-a nual. to a level where they no longer exert an adverse euviro=ental or econe_ic effect en the community. Rat programs should strive to reach a =aintenance level defined as 21- or less of the premises with active exterior rat signs and zither: 15% or less of the premises with exposed garbage, or 30Z or less of the premises with unapproved refuse storage within a defined target area (i.e., do=unity), on an individual block basis. - They should also strive to reduce each of the causative con- ditions identified as having a negative impact upon the co;unity. A typical plan for conducting a rat control program includes: (1) Preattack Phase - A stage of the program in which information is provided to city officials through presentations, and to the general public through mass media and inaugural demonstrations. (2) -Attack Phase - A stage of the program in which comprehensive rat control activities (i.e., premises-by-premises inspections, concen- trated code enforcement, systematic rat killing, rat stoppage, coaunity information, motivation and education, citizen participation, ' interagency cooperation, adequate municipal services, improved premises sanitation, etc.) are conducted to reduce rat infestations and causative conditions in a target area to a maintenance level. P Eyhibit "D" 2 -� (3) Maintenance Phase - A stage of the program in -hick a maintenance '1 level has been achieved and sustained on a block-by-block basis in a target area. Field surve.:s are an essential surveillance requirement of every rat control program and should be conducted, routinely in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual, to measure the reduction in active rat signs and other causative conditions. The objectives of a rat control program and the direction it cakes are determined by the survey results. Every rat control program should have a satisfactory records syste= to evaluate its progress and deter=ine priorities. The system should provide for reporting, in a sequential tamer, the results of inspectional activities �1 on a block and premises basis. URBAN Fa. CO=OL S'uR�TVI;SPECTIO%' PLAN (1) Preapplicatioa Survers & Applicants for Federal Urban Rat Control grant funds should conduct r a baseline survey in a proposed target area to determine the premises prevalence rates for exterior active rat infestations and other causative conditions in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual. i (2) Preattac{ Survevs A baseline surrey should be conducted in the defined target area to determine prises prevalence . :tes for exterior active rat- �•� signs and causative conditions in accordance with the methodology j ' outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual. 00393 i k NOTE: If a baseline survey was conducted to satisfy the preapplication survey requirement, it need not be done again unless the proposed target area was redesigned. (3) Attack ?^ase Inspectio-s Co^ rehensive inspections (i.e., cremises-by-premises) to identify active rat sicns and other causative conditions should be conducted at least t_~ice yearly '_or all blocks in the attack phase. The interval between comprehensive inspections should be no -ore than six months. This interval is called a cycle. The methodology outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual should be used to conduct attack phase inspections. (4) Maintenance Phase Inspections/Survevs Comprehensive inspections should be conducted for all blocks in the maintenance prase until 60i or more of the blocs in a target area have achieved maintenance. Then, the Federal "Area Maintenance Verification Survey Methodology," a sample survey procedure, may be < used two or more times a year to confirm the status of those blocks reported in maintenance. NOTE: Comprehensive inspections should continue to be conducted at least twice yearly for blocks regaining in at_aek. Should inspection data i-d'rate that conditions have deteriorated and that rat infestations, unapproved refuse storage, and/or exposed garbage rates have risen above the maintenance level in a block, 00394 t,.i, OW 3 Exhibit 'fD" s appropriate attack activities should be zc=ducted to inprove the euviron=ental conditions a=d return that block to maintenance. Blocks that :ail to return to maintenance should be reported in the attack phase, t V V f 6—L7-75 0039-J i - V Exhibit "Du 5 URBAN RAT CC.iR•7L rRQG-1.'%S i. LOCAL A-':D FEDERAL Target Area Status -sce: Prem lica-icr ;e Preattac a_e_ _ - ?-seli-:e Attack "Maintenance :o=prchensive Lnspection e ri:lca:ion purvey Verification Survey * See Urban. Rat Control Program Survey Methodology. ** Consultation Provided (Fe.eral) 1. Preanvlicatien SLr-.•ev - A sample survey conducted in accordance with the methodology outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual to determine the nature and extent of the rat problem in a designated target area. It is conducted by applicants requesting Federal rat control funds to help support a State or local rat control program. 2. Baseline Survey - A sample survey conducted in accordance •aith the methodology outlined in the Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual to determine the premises prevalence rates of exterior active rat signs and causative conditions in a designated target area. The baseline survey is conducted: a) to satisfy a preapplication survey reeuire^ent, or b) to satisfy a preattack survey requirement for a new rat control program, or c) optionally, during attack phase activities (Federal). 3. Comprehensive inspection - A premises-by-precises inspection to determine the premises prevalence rates o: exterior active rat signs and causative conditions in a designated target area: The comprehensive inspection is' s conducted two or more times a year for all target area blocks in attack and maintenance until 80:. or =ore of the blocks have achieved maintenance. . 00 ]95 Exhibit "Drr 6 _1 4. lerifica_lon Survey - A s=ple of randomly selected blocks and M pra=ises in a target area previously classified in maintenance to 4 deter=-4=a if the area is appropriately classified. 1) The verification survey shculd be used to confir= achievement of maintenance --o or more titles a year in target areas :here SOX or more of all blocks have achieved maintenance (local). R 2) To analyze the data. a su—ary report of the survey findings should be prepared using the "Exterior Sanitation and Rat Survey" su—ary sheets (see Federal Urban Rat Survey Manual). All conditions on the fora should be suaarized. 3) If the findings are significantly different from previous survey results, a comprehensive inspection of the target area nay be indicated. NOTE: Federally funded rat control projects should submit a report of - their findings with a brief analysis to their Regional Office for review and comment. s 6-17-75 M j - Exhibir A(S) STATE OF CA 1FOJL%1A I DEPARTME.VT OF HEALTH ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 6-17-7.5 M —71 Exhibit A(S) 5717ATE OF C4r1FOWSLa t DEPARTNIE.VT OF HEALTH ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS (1) The attached Fair Employment Practices Addendum (Standard Form 3) by reference hereto is incorporated as part of this contract. (2) Any reimbursement for necessary traveling expenses and per diem shall be at rates not to exceed those applicable to regular Stats employees under State Board of Control rules.No travel outside the State of California shall be reimbursed unless prior written authorization is obtained from the State. (3) All equipment, material, supplies, or property of any kind purchased from funds advanced or reimbursed under the terms of this agreement and not fully consumed in the work described herein shall be the property of the State.At the time of purchase of equipment under the terms hereof the Contractor shall submit a list of such equipment in accordance with the instructions and format contained in the attached Exhibit A-1. Contractor shall,at the request of the State, submit an inventory of equipment purchased under the terms of this contract or any predecessor contract for the same purpose. Such inventory will be required not more frequently than annually. At the close of the project covered by this agreement the Contractor shall provide a final inventory to the State and shall at that time query the State as to the disposition of said equipment. Final disposition of such equipment shall be in accordance with instructions from the State to be issued immediately after receipt of the final inventory and request for disposition instructions. (4) Prior authorization in writing by the State will be required before the Contractor will be reimbursed for any purchase order or subcontract exceeding $1,000 for any articles, supplies, equipment or services or for any fee, or other payment, for consultation of one hundred fifty dollars(S150) or more per day. The Contractor must provide in his request for authorization all particulars necessary for evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such cost,and as to the reasonableness of the price or cost.For purchase of any item exceeding such minimum dollar ' amount, three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified.The Contractor must include in a written agreement with the vendor,or the subcontractor the following clause: ("Xame of Vendor or Subcontractor) agrees to maintain and preserve, until three vears after termination of(Contractor's name)'s agreement with the State of California, and to permit the State of California or any of its duly authorized representatives to have access to and to examine and audit any pertinent books, documents, papers and records of (Name of Vendor or Subcontractor)related to this(purebase order)or(subcontract)." The terms"purchase order" and "subcontract" as used in this paragraph (4) only, excludes: (a) purchase orders not exceeding 51,000; and (b)subcontracts or purchase orders for public utility services at rates established for uniform applicability to the general public. (5) All personnel employed by the Contractor under this contract shall meet the standards of training and experience required for comparable positions in State employment, as determined by the State. If the Contractor maintains a local merit or civil service system,then the personnel employed under the budget shall be subject thereto, providing such local system is generally comparable to standards with the State civil service system as determined by the State. HAS 1198 02!75) 4 i. Exhibit (S) (6) Examination of Records (a) The Contractor agrees to maintain books, records,documents, and other c6dence pertaining to the costs and expenses of this contract(hereinafter collectively called the "records") to the extent and in such detail as will properly reflect all net costs,direct and indirect, of labor, materials, equipment, supplies and services and other costs and expenses of whatever nature for which reimbursement is claimed under the provisions of this contract. (b) The Contractor agrees to make available at the office of the Contractor at all reasonable times during the period set forth in subparagraph (c) below any of the records for inspection,audit or reproduction by an authorized representative of the State. (c) The Contractor shall preserve and make available his records (i) for a period of four years from the date of final payment under this contract,and (ii) for such longer period, if any, as is required by applicable statute, by any other clause of this subcontract, or by subparagraphs 1 or 2 below. 1. If this contract is completely or partially terminated, the records relating.to the work terminated shall be preserved and made available for a period of four years from the date of any resulting final settlement. 2. Records which relate to(i)litigarion or the settlement of claims arising out of the performance of this contract, or (ii) costs and expenses of this contract as to which exception has been taken by the Stare or any of its duly authorized representatives,shall be retained by the Contractor until disposition of such appeals,litigation,claims,or exceptions. (d) Except for the records described in subparagraph (c) 2 above, the Contractor may in fulfillment of his obligation to retain the records as required by this clause substitute photographs,microphotographs, or other authentic reproductions of such records,after the expiration of two years following the last day of the month of reimbursement to the Contractor of the invoice or voucher to which such records relate, unless a shorter period is authorized by the State or its duly authorized representative. ' (7) A final invoice and, if required by this contract,a final report shall be submitted by the Contractor within 45 days after the termination date hereof except as may be otherwise specified herein. If a final report is required by this contract final payment hereon shallbe withheld until after receipt by the State of an acceptable report. (S) Any inventions male in the course of or under this contract shall be promptly and fully reported to the Chief Deputy Director, California State Department of Health. Patent applications shall not be filed on such inventions without the prior written consent of the aforementioned individual -2- • %st Via. , ..�_. Exhibit A(S) (9) Officials Not to Benefit No member of or delegate to Congress or the State Legislature shall be admitted to any share or part of this contract, or to any bcnefit that may arise therefrom;bur this provision shall not be const-red to extcnd to this contract if made with a corporation for its general benefit. (10) Covenant Against Contingent Fees The Contractor warrants that no person or selling agency has been employed or retained to solicit or secure this contract upon an agreement or understanding for a commission, percentage, brokerage, or contingent fee, excepting bona Pule employees or bona fide established commercial or selling agencies maintained by the Contractor for the purpose of securing business. For breach or violation of this warranty the State shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the contract prier or consideration,or otherwise recover, the full amount of such commission,percentage,brokerage,or contingent fee. (11) Inspection The State, through its authorized representatives, has the right at all reasonable times to inspect or otherwise evaluate the work performed or being performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed. (12) Nondiscrimination in Services,Benefits,and Facilities The Contractor will not discriminate against the intended beneficiaries of funds monitored by the Stare because of race,color,creed,national origin,or sex in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.42 U.S.C. § 200W,rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or as otherwise provided by law. For the purpose of this contract, distinctions on the grounds of race, color, creed, or national origin include but are not limited to the following.- deriving ollowing:deriving a participant any service or benefit or availability of a facility;providing any service or benefit to a participanrwhich is different,or is provided in a different manner or at a different time from that provided to other participants under this contract;subjecting a participant to segregation or separate treatment in any matter related to his receipt of any service;restricting a participant in any way in the enjoyment of any advantage or privilege enjoyed by others receiving any service or benefit; treating a participant differently from others in determining whether he satisfies any admission, enrollment quota, eligibility, membership, or other requirement or condition which individuals must meet in order to be provided any service or benefit,the assignment of times or places for the provision of services on the basis of the race, color, creed,or national origin of the participants to be served. The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that intended beneficiaries are provided services without regard to race,color,religion,sex,or national origin. (13) Procedure for Complaint Process The Contractor agrees that complaints alleging discrimination against the intended beneficiaries of funds monitored by the State because of race, color, national origin, creed,or sex will be resolved by the State through the Department of Health's Affirmative Action Complaint Process. -3 - 00400 Exhibit A(S) 4 (14) Only Applicable to Hospitals The Contractor will not discriminate against the intended beneficiaries of funds monitored by the State because of race,color,creed,national origin or srx,in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.42 U.S.C. § 2000d,ru!cs and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto,or as otherwise provided by law.The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that intended beneficiaries are provided services without regard to race,color,religion, sex.or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:advertisement conspicuously displayed advising the public that emergency health services are available without regard to race, color,religion,sex,or national origin and without regard to ability to pay. (1 S) Only Applicable to Hospitals Accepting hledi-Cal Patients The Contractor will not discriminate against the intended beneficiaries of funds monitored by the State because of race, color, religion,sex,or national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d, rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, or as otherwise provided by law.The Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that intended beneficiaries are provided services without regard to race,color,religion,sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: advertisement conspicuously displayed advising the public that .Medi-Cal services are available to the public without regard to race,color.religion.sex,or national origin. 1 -4- 0040-L FAIR rvnLOv_••,O.r PRACTICES r.DCiW.4 1. In the performance of tris contract, the Contractor rill not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, reli- gion, ancestry, sex, age', or national origin. The Contractor :rill take affirm- ative action to ensure that aeplicar_ts are employed, and that ermioyees are treated during employment, without regnrd to their race, color, religion, an- cestry, sex, age, or national origin.. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the fo?lo•.n_ng: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruit- ment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination: rates of pay or other fc—s of compensation: and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Contractor shall post in conspicuous places, available to e=loyees and aDDlicar_ts for employment, notices to be provided by the State setting forth the provisions of 'this :air =Ioy^ent Practices section_ 2_ The Contractor will permit access to his records of employment, employment advertisements, application forms, and other pertinent data and records by the State :air ^mmloymment Practices Commission, or any other agency of the State of California designated by the awarding authority, for the purposes of investiga- tion to ascertain compliance with the Fair Employment Practices section of this contract_ -Remedies for Willful Violation: (a) The State may determine a willful violation of the Fair cloyment Practices arovisior_ to have occurred upon receipt of a final judg- ment having that effect from a court in an action to which Contrac- tor was a pa_-may, or upon receipt of a written notice from the Fair I-p_oyme_^_t Practices Commission that it has investigated and deter- mined that the Contractor has violated the Fair Employment Practices ;ct and has issued an order, under S.abor Code Section 1426, which has become final, or obtained an injunction under Labor Code Section 1429_ (b) For willful violation of this Fair Z=Ioyment Practices provisionn, the State shall have the right to terminate this contract either in whole or in Dart, and any loss or damage sustained by the State in securing the goods or services hereunder shall be borne and paid for by the Contractor and by his surety under the performance bond, if any, and the State cay deduct from any moneys due or that thereafter may become due to the Contractor, the difference between the Drice named in the contract and the actual cost thereof to the State- "it is unlawful employment practice for an employer to refuse to hire or - e"ploy, or to discharge, dismiss, reduce, suspend, or demote, any indivi- dual between the ages of 40 and 64 solely on the ground of age,___" Gabor Code Section 1420_1) STD_ 3 (Rev. 8/73) 00402 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California R September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Contract f24-077 with Rubicon, Inc. for provision of Community Mental Health Workshop in Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the following Short Form Service Contract: NUMBER: 24-077 CONTRACTOR: RUBICON, INC. TERM: September 14, 1976 to December 14, 1976 PATMENT LIMIT: $668.00 DEPARTMENT: Medical Services - Mental Health T Provision of Community Workshops in "Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention; SERVICE: Effective Parenting; Family Relationships and Communication" 90% provided by the State of California; 10% by the County FUNDI\G: (Budgeted under the County's 1976-77 Short-Doyle Plan, State approved) PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28th day of September, 19 76 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor County Medical Services— By Deputy Clerk Mental Health Craig 00403 BEJ:dcg i Coozr_ Costa Cour Y $taadarC_Yo= __ SPORT FOQ.`i SERVICE CC 'T 11CT 1. Contract Itenri_itation. ::umbe2 40 `7`7r _ Department: Medical Services - Mental Health Subject: Mental Health Community Workshop: Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention; Effective Parenting; Family Relationships and Communication 2. Parties. The County o: Contra Costa, California .(County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: RUBICON, INC. Capacity: nonprofit California corporation Address: 1510 Macdonald Avenue, Richmond, California 94301 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is September 14, 1976 and it te—imates December 14, 1976 unless soo=er terminated as provided herein. '. Termination. This Contract may be temir==ed by the County, at its sole discretion, ugon five-day advance written notice thereof to =^e Contractor, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. 5. Payment Limit. County's total payments co Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 668.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor's provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Concractorl, upon submission of a properly doct—__a=ted demand for payment in the tanner and form prescribed by County (Demand Form D-13) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or =E RATE: $ 668.00 per service unit: (X) session, as defined below; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of one (1) service uait(s)_ 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor steal_ provide the following described services: Consultation, specialized instruction and training in Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention; Effective Parenting; Family Relationships and Communication for County-selected persons in the time, place and manner required by County, including the provision of any related materials and supplies. - One session, for payment purposes, shall be defined as the provision of at least eighty-five (85) full hours of such service. S. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, join= venture, or association. 9. Indemnification. The Contractor shall de'5a::d, save harmless and indemnify the County =d its officers-, agents and employees from all 1--abilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all coasequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise. of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or ez=it . 10. i.egal Authority. This Contract is entered =o under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Government Code Sections 26227 and 31000. Welfare and Institutions Code (Division 5, Part 2, The Short-Doyle Act) and California Administrative Code (Title 9, Subchapter 3, Community Mental Health Services under the Short-Doyle Act). .11. Siggatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COL^+ii OF CONTRA COSTA. CI IIFORXU% CO:ITFUCTOR — t P. Kenny 8�4,_,Man,_bddra lotUp o+sons Designee Recc—ended by Depa eat �l''- �2c�*�i f a�_:CTMiL_ 10 ,010 (Designate offici=l capacicf) i r 3v r Designee (Form aoocov.=_c! by County Counsel) 00404 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 01 In the Matter of Authorizing Chairman to sign application for the Calendar Year 1977 Head Start Program for a total of $675,001 which reflects the $494,492 Federal funds plus $180,509 in non-federal resources. The Chairman is hereby AUTHORIZED to sign the grant application for the Calendar Year 1977 Head Start Program, Form 424 and Form CA 189 for a total of $675,001 which reflects the $494,492 Federal funds plus $180,509 in non-federal resources. The County contribution is $64,27/. APPROVED BY THE BOARD September 28, 1976. t 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Orig. Dept.: OEO Witness my hand and the Seal I of the Board of cc: County Administrator Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this 20th day of September. 1976 Head Start- c/o 00 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk np NeWqG 00405 H 24 !/75 101A I OMS APPM21 Na 29-R0218 Ff�QE.4AL ASSISTANCE Z CANT H 0375 AAP ur� L X76 080928 ,,... CAWn TION 3'TWE p FXWUCMCN � Law .�.t� WEMT1- Lam Tsar aow2�► day ACTION ®APF3.tGTM 19 7 ASSIGNED 11976 0$ 05 (u.a.p ❑tratu'.u=OF MIENI (Opts �..„ Oscar OF FOUR AMON 3Da� 4 LEGAL APPUCJWi/REgWEKT S.FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. a AFFUMatKi•. : Contra Costa County Board of Supervis 94 - 6000 - 509 1/T L amaaiatSa Via : Office of Sconosac Cpportunity C.SS.wF.a bu rdministrat_on Building � a MASER 11131- 1610101 a av : ?artinez a� : Contra Costa GRAMa TME L Sera California a zL-cars 94553 rem l Child Develonnent a cowd P.® (.V.>,. Frvro W Afock cataLiyl Head Start &ea.,r a..N.a 6151 372-22ho a 7.TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPLICJWTS PROJECT a.TYPE OF APPLICANT/RECIPIENT R-Wmsselq Ael:as Ataw Head Start x1111 Year Tart Day a-I .t as. t-ID/Mr Ea.otaaal tasdtudoe FS"at"' 3-Iodise Tribe Comrehensive preschool Dr gram for children of Datrid K-Otos (Spas A econadcally disadvantaged falxlies. Programs: C° F-Sc1od Dbtrid provides for educational, medical, dental, G-sy.ad Purpose nutritional, social, parent involvement services Disaid Eater appropriate Litter and services to handicapped children. 2. � N ASMST D-Sa�plmaa5l 6raot E-0thar E■ter appro. . CAM priate kner(s) w 10.AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT Maa.e of c44a roto. 1L ESTIMATED NUM• 1Z TYPE OF APPLICATION Srataa,496.11 BER OF PERSONS A-Ma. C-nwwm E-AupoWAV a SENEFITINQ Contra Costa Count- 353 S-Rawad D-CoohnnUm Eater appropriate(ester 13, PROPOSED FUNDING ls.CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF. 15.TYPE OF CHANGE (Far Ise or Ste) A-Iscrawo Ddtan F-0Wr(Spedly) :..FDEUIt h9h 92 ib�h;e NAa AMM 60.ocioo O8 08. 07 D-becro a DWAIiw Itis PROJECT START a7 PROJECT E'{a'ty DATE Tar a.aA day DURATION Eats►apyro• a tDGL 63,623.w 19 01 O i ndefisi1-vkmi** print.ie:tw(aJ m� a OTIER .00 ID.ESTIMATED DATE TO Taraoali day 19.EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER HE SUBMITTED TO L Talc S 18 11Koo FEDE RAL AGENCY p. 1976 09 30 H 0375 $ 20.FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Naar.C"Stases ZLP ods) 2L REUARI(S ADDED Office of Child Develo=--nt San Francisco, Ca. 9hlO2 p Yea ®No ZL a To tM bed of or la d to aed belial a N nGsinA 4 otls Wolr AAS tab an inds..ss a�lr4 Rosset b la. No re. 11c po.'" doh In be From ialio/apetiotis an &Cocoas Casey,b apprayrists dart.awns W aD rapema an stet!@& #poems attac"d .� THF true am mvaL La doaost bs las APPLICANT t» estaarimd 4 IL rAwaIM » d tt COMFIES tr aW"M ass Onazelcud.m W State a CalifOrr3i3 ❑ p% TNAT► oft the at:a:l.d asscaata U Me sat'd- � ❑ p ata is.rat=••@ ICU ❑ ❑ 23, a ITPED WAM ARD TIMI,a SJi[IATUitE a.DATE SIG ED ^ P. (�en<7� T... -.1d& 1e, FttPRE James P. Le-1. , C +all VA/ SENTATIVE Board of Sianervisors 76 9 28 24.AGENCY HAKE nom PUG• Tar ao.A da, RECEIVED 19 2L ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT V.ADUMISTRATTwE OFFICE 2R FEDERAL APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION . 2L ADDREM 30.FEDERAL GRAM WE"FIGTION 31.ACTION TAKEN >Z ruki UNQ Tear s.aaA day 3s, Tar auA da, 13 a AURM aIDGL FOs CO 3L ACTION DATE► 19 STARTING OATS 39 L WJE= a Arnma AD 35.COKUICT FOR ADDITIONAL WFORMA• 3i Tar -a" ea DON (Naas 4.4 tsin Ae.. ...Jw) ELIDING Q a FSTUiaED I= a EWE Amo DATE 39 AYYJCUM a tom Amo 37.REMARKS ADDED 13 a Damn a OTTER m o a RITNDRItTa L TOM S .DO Q Ys 10N. 3S. a la hemi sbme wboo,sew tum-mu re—wd kts d+riepf@tsa...is ►FEDERAL AZEP=A-95 DMCM OU406 ei7vad.If atua nsaamo a aw ansa zreuxs d Pact L Dley t:.r'ar A�JS. (Nage cad telep-owe ws) FEDEFAL ASEA'CY it bs was a a be Al sax -( L c__ �^ A-95 Ac: 4� Microfilmed w li 9w g Agw °not I rs to the Istt of eotlec n" COVER SHEET for FEDERAL GRANT APPLICATION AWARD NOTIFICAT 1 APPLICATION DATE 4n,-*other Project Reviews-STATE OF CALIFORNIA y rnO +r !7_ IS t-(al IC BE COMPLETED Sy APPLICANT /9�� O? -i--'Op PLICANT-Orpanaabonal Unit 4.ADDRESS-Street or P.O_Box 2 FEDERAL EMPLOYER ID N0. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SIiPER11ISORS ADMINISTRATION BUILDItiG 946 00 0509 W 5.CIT-Y 6.COUNTY 7.STATE e.ZIP CODE g,PROG TITLEMO.ICatalog of Fed Domestic Assistance) MARTINEZ CONTRA COSTA CA 94553 1 13.600 HEAD START 10.Tl'•E OF ACTION TYPED CHANGE(Comptets it 1pp or 1pc oras cr»ct.dl 14.EXISTING FED GRANT ID. I 1. /3.tt----Tt } ONO. t ❑Modification a Olncraased Dollars • :Ad Increased Duration a l�Other Scope Ch bl3Continuadon D❑Deusasad Dotlera D❑Oecreesed Duration b❑Canuttadon H0375 R • Yr mo 19.APPLICANT TYPE Enter Lsner FUNDS REOUESTEDIForCl-,psSho.p,NarL yAallnc(�1arDKf•1J 15.REQUESTED FUNDSTART 1933-M A.State F.School District D m.FEDERAL ( I S 498,994 00 ;6.FVLOS DURATION 12 fMonth) B_interstate G.Community Action Agency 2rSrArF ( Js - ,Op Yr mo C.Sub State Dist H.Sponsored Organisation 'L0C4'L r Is 124,748 .00 17.ESI.PROJECT START T9_,-_� p.County I. (radian 21 OT7rFR ( is .00 .8.ESS.PROJECT DURATION _(Months) E. City J. OthertSpeci-V inRemart Sa.f0T4t f2v.21.2zu1 r /S 623.742 _00 =S.BRIEF TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT HEAD START FULL YEAR PART DAY '6.DETSCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT lPur,•aow) CONTINUATION OF PREVIOUS YEAR'S FUNDING. PROJECT PROVIDES comPRERENSIxTE PRE-SCHOOL E.XIERIE:CE FOR 353 3 and 4 YEAR OLD CHILDREN, 90 PERCENT OF WHICH COME FROM LOW INCO`lE FAMILIES. PRE SCHOOL EXPERIENCE INCLUDES EDUCATION, MEDICAL, NUTRITION MENTAL HEALTH, PARENT INVOLVEMENT Aim HANDICAPPED SERVICES 27.AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT tlndicata City,County,State,am) E - MUl NT;1- CONTRA COSTA coL WIDE WIDCOU❑ 28,CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT 29.Em)ronmenta(Asseamant Required 30.CLEARINGHOUSE(S)TO WHICH SUBMITTED Ol Applicant Districts Imps--,.a By Project 9y SutelFederal A,Teney7 13Y. 08 083, 07 3 ®No a!'State b ❑Area Wide c❑None 1,a P AME/TITLE OF CONTACT PERSON b ADDRESS-Stress or P.O.Boa c TELEPHONE NO. MYRON W. MOCK, COORDINATOR 1214 WARD STREET, MARTIIIEZ, CA f,41-1372-2240. 31.d 1t ENVLLRONMENTAL DOCUMENT REVIEW REQUIRED YES I] NO EM a WAI the project require h If project is physical in nature or regtares an If Ya L_I Enotonmental Imoaa Statement(Report)Attached(20 copies) relorenvironmental document.list the U.S. 0 Draft EIR 0 Final EIR . YES NO GeofogieSurvey Quadrangle map in which th p Negative Declaration Attached t20 copies) t Does your a envy have a project is located. Q None atnurtd-Document Will Be Forwarded On c.1 rights a famat#ve a=.on poL:Y and pian? - ApproximatelyYES M NO rl Man Day Year 91so act covered by ogr If No Federal Pram Does Not Require An Environmental DocuTnent A. • IACV7 7 Project Exempt Under State Categaricsl Exemptdn,Class if yeisis7(TOA e0.e cTldT YES Q NO 0 ITEMS 32 38 TO BE COMPLETED BY CLEARINGHOUSE MULTI L 32.CLEARINGHOUSE ID �CLEARING.OUSE a.RI BASED ON �33.b ACTION TAKEN REVIEW ��rVrIEW OF STATE APPLICATION �igNtx ilicetion • WiM Com.-nen: t �lVaned iDE NTIFIER fSAll A D.ffu�,�'Appliution O Rvabout Comment is aUn!avorable l State Number STATE WIDE County; CITY County! City County/ City County/ Csty County/ City County/ City 5.CL€ARtt.GHOUSE Plnp Area %nC Ar Ping Area Plug Area Ping A.ea Ping Area IAIPACT CODE ❑Yet 1 J(I No �� 6.STATE PLAN REQUIRED 37.RECEIVING DATE ..-.�jfj ^^d-.+..�y IfURE OF CHOP C)ey� AT CLEARINGHOUSE 191L2 7tYY. L.�Yes l/I No 38.FINAL CH ACTION DATE ^+Sr, d+r 7"� ..f, � ITEMS'3932 TO BE COMPLETEDS" APPLICANT BEFORE SENDING v ORM TO FEDERAL AGENCY The applicant ces chat tome best of hn knowNd2e and oel#t Tne ab�.e,team*true anij .CEfi71FICATIpN- _ Ct dt bo:it attached-, correct and filing of Mn1iXm hK been OuIY authorized by the gorsrn.r.g a,d�of the appl.cant. .TaTp';nSt is attached... - 0.a 'AME(Pt'intceType) aTITLEChai�an GNATURE of; utl it AR I, n iv J,• d TELEPHONE NUMBER ., ,' r7 ;Contra Costa Cour ao d of Su ervis , 1t- 1 372-2371 a.DATE MAILED TO FEDERAL ISTATE AGENCY. yr mo, day 42 AME OF FCDERAL 1 STAT_.AG CYT;. TO WHIGO'F) 5 APPLICATtO 'JTTED i x ITEMS 43.54 TO BE COMPLETED 8Y FEDERAL OFFICE EVALUATING AND RECOat+,.ENDING CT#bZ!,IbN THE APPLICATION .3.GFIANT APPLICATION ID 52. Appl.cation Recd. 153-a E.p.Actior.'rLre' i - 53.b Rat to Appl.cant •y Aa.9ned by Federal Agency) rr mo riey rr mo der Always Compktr. yr con da♦ 19 19 53a OR b 19 t _e.GRANTOR AGENCY R I Amended Apoi.c_ R Rw.E.petted 54.E.0-Action R Fes.to Rece,red Acton Data Rer.sed ADol-cant E As Of E S.OFIGANIZATIONAL UNIT V V V r rr m0 der c rr mD ca, yr m0 day C Vr rrlo CIY ( 19___ 1 t9 19 I 39 S.A•MINISTERING OFFICE -- -i- N t9---- N 19`' 19 NSSS 19 S 19_, I ,7.AIIDRESS-Street or P.O.Boa, �48.CITY 9.STATE ISO.ZIP CODE 5t.TELEPHONE NUMBER ITEMS 55 455 TO HE COMPLETED By THE FEDERAL OFFICE APPROVING THE GRANT APPLICATION FI AL ACTION FINAL DATES rr mo car I FUNDS APPROVED IFor Ct-.&rWs Show OnlyAmc of lne 01 or Dec NJ A.woad b❑ Rejected c Dvva"I raw•. 19-- ---- 60.F£DEP.A-I AMOLrrr IF Y funds) I is .00 ..FyNDSAVAILABLE 19---161.STATESHARE ( 1S .00 19 162.LOCAL SHARE I . 7.£KDING DATE _ i ( is .00 -. FQDERAL GRANT ID 63 OTHER ( 1S .00 64.TOTAL(60.61.62,63) 1 is .00 :9.FIrI DERAL FUND ACCOUNT NUMBER 65.MULTIPLE PROGRAM-LINK MWs v f '' ti'e• _. ��M�E Ill t::cili�ll�11I7 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE RECEIVED to OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH ' 1400 TENTH STREET S E P 14 1976 SACRAMENTO 95a14 EDMUND G. BROWN Js. (916) 445-0613) aHEAD S ART GVSMNQR Septer.+ber 10, 1976 Myron W. clock Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 1214 Ward Street Martinez, CA 94553 SUBJECT: SCH 76080928 - HEAD START FULL YEAR PART DAY Dear Mr. Mock: The above listed project was submitted by the State Clearinghouse to numerous State agencies for review. The review has been completed, and there were no comments on the project. This letter verifies your compliance with preapplication review requirements. Please attach it to your formal application. Ile request that you use the State Clearinghouse number assigned to your project on the cover page of your application and on all subsequent references to this application, since it will be used by the funding agency when the State Clearinghouse is notified of the awarding of your grant. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, William G. Kirkham Management Systems Officer State Clearinghouse 00408 t i �1YYailr� i V4 _ Sincerely, � William G. Kirkham Management Systems Officer State Clearinghouse 00408 i i jPART It 049 MO.e0.R0 teL i PROJECT APPROVAL INFORMATION t Item 1. ? Does this assistance request require State,local, Name of Governing Body regional,or other priority rating? Priority Rating Yes x No i e Item 2. � Does this assistance request require State,or local Nome of Agency or advisory,educational or health clearances? Board YesX_No (Attach Documentation) Item 3. Does this assistance request require clearinghouse (Attach Comments) review in accordance with OMB Circular A-95? i % Yes No Item 4, Does this assistance request require State,local, Name of Approving Agency "tonal or other planning approval? � Date Yes N^ Item 5. = Is the proposed project covered by an approved compre- Check one: State p hensive pian? Local p Regional ❑ -Yes-No No Location of Plan Item 6, Will the assistance requested serve a Federal Name of Federal Installation installation? Yes X No Federal Population benefiting from Project Item 7. Will the assistance requested be on Federal land or Name of Federal Installation installation? $ Location of Federal Land Yes No Percent of Prajed Item fi Will the assistance requested have an impact or effect See instructions for additional information to be an the eavimnment? p, provided. Yes No • Item 9. Number of. j Will the assistance requested cause the displacement Individuals I of individuals, families,businesses,or farms? Families Businesses Yes % No Farms Item 10, } Is them other related assistance on this prajec previous. See instructions for additional information to be t pending,a anticipated? provided I Yes_g_No i U409 I t r 4 A a H = c r 3 n N N FIt 9 IM i� — � a• 41 p 4 G M e M N Aw w 10 O C� O N N O r O O m z to ... = , 1 CO i m 1 1 ` 1 O C O O C C1 In C Z a O H r 1 D a N r r O • Z 1 < N N = ' N CO O i t a O O 1 1 1 a I.n tit --J4 L £SS76 YJ `zauiziej; It �aCa i lG.^.`.Ta Costa CaIrIty :+GTG of �p2 C;: cLKS� � r i 11715 L � � llllllll ! 3 _ M M � 1 I � � � • M M j r = m o i a Co r' M M I�1 p - p N N o r o o rVUIIJLU 'I S[£OH £ a52c £SS16 V:) `ZauT11L'W Pace �c: ra Costa 'r+Ct:II ty Bc rd af Suz rvisc_i U. c-553 ♦i V 10 'o�` s I 1:•I�i u .� o E a s 2 ; n r+ o .� CD o � .a z 1� 0 C3 3 3 i o f 9 � a • m K i -4 1 1 c+ D µ m e > N y -p tT H N N Z. O -a a 2 > 7 1 m y p 0 0 ? O m ? > Q Q X > .Z •� t- QQ v m Q l7 9 97 p N T O 0 ['1 yr m o o > m m = m H p 1- > m Z e Z m LA.. ..! m m Y m m n cz O C 1 � O � v O > D m F� r F'' ►-' N N M p O O i i-� Y i• of -4 O O = N NO rn = H ON L w o o O OO o z CO . O a • OU411 .T.v F. tits �-• o C n C/ w - _o 0 M 1 ~ � m � V V W ."� •y O V Oci N �.. co O O N W V tJ1 N W r T .O N � N � n O c O co > a 1 1 = co m 1 c z d O v p i O 0 $ m O m Cf � m c O 3 n >. -1 N W T -( O V V -. i = ' o f � t M M H Y W W r e z C. m * F 00 c T V7 N d I 3 N co W 1 1 1 w m V x o V O O N J W O lr V V C A - r s 0 1uaS; a:eSaLa� vo 'puot-gOtg 'zaas.s omely Tc£ pueagozg g3zo1 jo asnoH pocgsogg3za�: 00412 s s _ace Cc:-,,..a Costa County Bcard of Sur.:_5 Yar;,irez, r-; H0375 L V y . D O �O v ? • • IC, n n T ~ • N rn K o tc+ o rn ~' o C o R S C C) a n _ � rn ' ..'7 C 7 N � V � • rn N N N cr ' rn �• O n •, T J rn r r M Z c+ ► rn Y Y C) .p d ;aC2 rn r o 0o rn o o it � c o o - rn Cl < rn m ;a m > z n in .. e = z rn T rn O o o " Z C y C rngo rn s• j � .�. S O � N � N n O = C o > O � M O O o O O a o' ri> = O O s N N O rn ;a ~ -4 0 o O O o s � - r e i j ^ — 2 N a. n m ib Q M F� n . r � e O x y tJ %D In coo 00 O Q V w Ln N w .p m 3 O c O f 12 n 1 3 t C G e a G7 v a ; • _ m „ n � 4A 0 m c X > a 1' sI > —I _ m N co 00 w � 2 ' • ~ ~ i 3i co I� c i N M M O 1 1 1 I O O o Jc 00 Ij OBD w O O , a ! Co -� e S i r lua$� alp�alaQ �-a loapo� i slaalls OAVI pup PUZ •aur 'ialuao luacdolan.aQ plTqj oapog 00414 M iii y O = M n o C') _ _ o U � n r A 3 N � V 0 O M O M r Q N N O to CD tp N w yr Ln n N • N } n c z i v D t A 1 0 t C r v C a te m a • -4 a m _ 3 Sa ,. ? N D r > -i '� O M W i i M 4� � s W =. Ln 7 s i a r N W W W a N 1 N V 1 3 Ln J 1 f-= v O O e O . N N O Ln 1 co .? Ln Ln 9 lJti Ln N N r J M o co co • z 0 i 0 3ua5}� a3£$ajaQ ESS76 VO `zau;ZaVX 1aaa.S euesnS IZo 33ialstq IoogaS pa.jgu.,j zeui.aE;; 0041.5 P- r Y ... d �. t• Y S 4 cl� O M Y A O l0 N p M N W A s S � cT • • C1 r C1 z « N H tr cr. i 1 1 1 to Ln y N Y tom' O C1 N %0 N N 60 a N Z 3 X t Q 1 s t c t o c to c) m mrn y�r �? N Uf Ltd "� Z r t-� 1 z « « f W e N N a •r... � n V W • a a " 1 1 i 1 fJ o 0 ur 0% v u+ L- C. _ a E co O i 4 � a 1ua2v ale8alaQ V3 1plo:)Uoo aniaQ U23013E'J 4£61 20TJISTa loat{aS Pa13?un oI4EFQ .211 00416 t F _ o• a a n cr S" d c S CIV ellL M S P _O S O M r r W A ¢ s O o '�- O e Y 0 M M Co CDF-` a w "a 4 t - r N p O V v O CD O N N = m m - ; n -1 i C3CP C2 N N CS 4 cC O G = O • iL ru 'Tt � � d w � N N 31n y C, rill O CDao s ;c V _ z N CID N o z r 4 Q N N C N N t Q1 N i 41 r O • 41 t M N C1 r a O O N Cn O00 LA co y V tJ0 41 a s t aua��t a7e�alaQ '8sngs2a?d anuanv essapp ;OZ g3ango asTadeg assi3 004151 CIN o c m C3 q _• s A 3 N y q A � O r w � o o •_ � M • Lm in s o %A m .. .. C% w V V u7 w LA o u+ o N N w � N N ' A n -I Li O .- a M 3 > I t tD 4 t s t C • o v p " O O -m�! m a mZ A - -1 .n 30 m c Z 3r � O - r • H N � r r • CA co i D 00 co s .n In A C A I CA 41 N r « c i r .a N u, �n to t n r t tT co 1 i+ u, CSW O r . { C% 0% w v v tn m Ln - o r r r o u, o Ln 0 i Vo `POEPiEo aaaaas uossa33af ££7 saiaraego ailogleo aassalaa auasaid LL6T 203 Palaalas aq oa aua2V aaaalaa 00418 t v C ZV R ire R <ra C io L) R -U> r..tl cr N Q7 R n o rt ^ a, Oo C O Y C' W N F- Oc n m F-' v K w R V rt W O C c0 r✓ In O > O F+ C G a m Ln n R 'J. Q n C) m n W < O rt K C m A n t? m R n H n o n m va n n °c w w m n co to m R N N n O m H n N V V w O, W A W R O O O 0 0 O v0 U + a. 0 a s c pms c� 0 m n Y N r% M to V r wr • 1 O n to _ Ln V N O to In 00 O rn w to a Cn.o O Ln V N O n Y 40 Xti iJa H C V O� CC N N -4 to i W Cjn ZEN ^W w F- O V V 00 LA A < HO N O Y tD F-O V O 00 co%0 Ol Fi m O to CIO� 00 a,%D VO O O 00 Z,%ON O. m W> n nen -� -c •^ •v � � �- a s •on �. xn rozzn ion t o A D O C r /-w n rt rr m m A m m O O m 0 0 Oa m m 0 F+ M W O Q n b M tr• n R n n n n n n n n - pK W F+ O crm m n - m 0 ?0 n N n rt m m G R m rt rt m n Y • m w 00 F--" Ya A O QC p W n n'? 3Y3 " m rr n A 'r1 c rt C R r- r- Y rt n n rt t+W 0 0 rt O•o- m m 0 .. O O rt K p a m C rp m p A ID O m m O-E n C m O O p 7 n C rt i+ p C cr N N n m d w K K rrCav am 3 0- p i+ n 0_ '77 � F- m m rr m A T7• m a m W m r- :3 p R R C O C) C C n R L7 N n O o Y F+C'7 W A t3 R K M`C F- C Fr p�• Y - `t p w O O rt µ m 000 R W W N m A CCS W W C= rt W o.a. = C' n :r n ?� �< tc Cf: Rrt COVIr 00 - 3 n G Cxro m rr 3, 0 r. K 00 •7 m < R O O Y K m YR :0- :3 w= C C n `< n s ro 00 t� rt n 0 m m A rt Q 0 m m 0 o n Q m n m m o a m W m n ^ m' nr, m rr rt O <4 Y << n n'C q • R W V n V. W rf. n W m= nrCOM O ^z -4tr. ".S,' nW ^6 Nrwroto cl 0ro14 -0 n n tf b A Y-O -O m Y 7 Y n T p n -7 O F-'C n _ H n C 0 -Z H n n m O O O v m m A p d m m A ID M n O p A C p 0 O•cr n•O• n p p 0 0 << n n a m n A O n n 1- m to C F+ m n ft m n " M 0 Y F+n m n m m C n m n ID Q m n m `,;,'m o n n :v O A m m W N m O F- m m m ti w O- C C Y m H n n m m n p m R A Y n C K Y n Y n m m 0 Y Y o c o n - rt o n R =`1. 0 rt n Y R rt X b n m o —W- ono n n < A -• o o A o z : >r o m m 0 m m m d 3 to n 3 A 3 m 0 O m 3 m 0[1 C m 0 - 3 00 rr R µ m rtmd O . = F-H m rt W " m K m K K WWN- F+ 1+<nn n a n < 0 n m <m n M C w Y <m m m m m Y7C <m m n 0 0 to 7 to O n rt n O O ro Q n 3 rt O Y 0 m rt m C 0 }-Y m 7 O A y d 1+ r n S R Y W 7 A n Ra Y n A C cc o A c rt m n m m C n n n n S ncr. c pmt nY W to �' n w rt n 7 m O Y n C C m A 0 0 n 0 F-•< n >2 1 .0 n I<'< n m m m m o R a- rt dr-n n K M o rt m tn0 C C rt 0 n n m a a c m O m R rt c m n m m 0 N a n n m 0 0 0 < < 3riW C 0= m w Id 0 7 A n m m m M • n w m 0 m m M M m 1+ i+ O r m C 0 n to m n R n > X w C C K n w 0 O O C m n C n n n n m • T`< m ID rr n r r r m 0 Q O n n rt m Q m Y m m rt M m O n R n N d rt O F- m .-3 n m m �t rt m m 0 n O O f.. n V A m 3 n C m O m 7 m m K n n O Y W < o•n rt co i m Ym A Y tor- o rt x O m N X a Y ^{ F- G n t•. V O n R R m F+• W rt C 1+ < M - O O rt Q O OMR p F+ C n - rr 0 tp • m rt rr- .^.. x N �C - .a _ n Mo n n roa w 1-- a Y m R ONrr OL: W W -- r• n rr rt OOQ < 3 C m W n `z rt n�.. O n A W• Z-w m O m A X O m 0 n C m > R m K a R X X Y ►� n n o n r F• n z. Q rr t+ in N C A >c n m a 0 < o > >+ ? 0 to M. •Nc ac c n r3 C n n m A N N X n O W• �< - n 0 n n m p w 6 N,7C > m n O O n O -co n n C R rn O C to N n p P N OC O m XR rOt Ym„ n rt O t0 W C to m 0 m 0 O x O rt N=^ _ r t-- X m rt W A Ort o R n n o n t+ n � c EI R W 7 -'3 •7 n K X 7 o n m C m ttz O + c n •< 7 n Y 0 co o - Y o O C n .. 41 O W m N H n a v N R 4 ;i I , Page PART V ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby assures and certifies that he will comply with he regulations,policies,guidelines.'and requirement! including OMB Circulars Nos A-87,A•95,and A-102,as they relate to the apolication,acceptance and use of Federal funds for this Federally assisted project Also the Applicant assures and certifies with respect to the grant that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant:that a 4. It will comply with requirements of the provisions resolution, motion or similar action has been duly of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property adopted or passed as an official act of the applicants Acquisitions Act of 1970 ML 91-6461 which provides governing body,authorizing the filing of the application, for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced as a including all understandings and assurances contained result of Federal and federally assisted programs therein,and directing and authorizing the person identi- S. It will comply with the previsions of the Hatch Act fled as the official representative of the applicant to act which limit the political activity of employees in connection with the application and to provide such 6. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum additional information as may be required. hours provisions of the Federal Feir Labor Standards 2 It WWII comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of Act. as they apply to hospital and educational institu- 1964 (P.L 88.352) and in accordance with Title VI of tion employees of State and local governments that Act, no person in the United States shall, on the 7. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from ground of race. color, or national origin, be excluded using their positions for a purpose that is or gives the from participation in, be denied the benefits of,or be appearance of being motivated by a desire for private otherwise subjected to discrimination under any pro- gain for themselves or others, particularly those with eral whom they have family,business,or other ties gram or activity for which the applicant receives Feda o 8 It will give tgrantor agency e the Comptroller Gen- financial assistance and will immediately take any mea- necemry to effecwate this agreanent. anal through any authorized representative the access to or and the right to examine all records.records,books.Pagers. 3. It will comply with Tide VI of the Civil Rights Act of documents related to the grant 1964(42 USC 2000d)prohibiting employment diserimi- 9. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the nation where (1) the primary purpose of a grant is to Federal grantor agency concerning special requirements provide employment or(2)discriminatory employment of law, pian requirements,and other administrative pr=ices will result in unequal treatment of persons who requirements approved in accordance with Office of are or should be benefiting from the grant-aided activity. Management and Budget Circular No.A-107- 00420 -10200420 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Project Agreements for Activities Number 32, 33, and 37 for the Second Year Community Development Program (1976-1977) The Board having this day considered the recommendation of the Director of Planning and the Community Development Advisory Council that it approve Community Development Block Grant Program Project Agreement Number 37 between the County and the City of Clayton for $6,500, and Community Development Block Grant Program Project Agreement'Numbers 32 and 33 between the County and the Ambrose Recreation and Park District for $40,000, in order to carry out the intent and purpose of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 for the period of September 28, 1976 to June 30, 1977. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute said Agreements. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Orig.: Planning Department affixed this 28tttfay of Sevtember . 19 76 cc: Ambrose Recreation and Park District City of Clayton, c/o Planning Department J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller B Deputy Clerk County Administrator y Gait'67 0021 H-24 3/76 Ism - IM r" 1 • PROJECT AGREEMENT COMINITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRMI 1. Agreement Identification. Number 37 Department: County Planning Department Subject: Allocation of Federal funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 - 2. 974 -2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: City of Clayton Address: 6054 Alain Street Clayton, CA 94517 SEP 22 b 1516 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is and it terminates June 30. 1977 unless sooner terminated as provided herein, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 4. Allocation Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed $6,500 S. County's Obligations. County shall make those allocation payments to the contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances con- tained or incorporated herein. 6. General Conditions and Assurances. This Agreement is subject to the "General Conditions" and the "Assurances" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work as described in and in accordance with the "Project Work Program" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms, conditions and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Agreement implements in whole or in part the following described project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: That Project as described in the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program Application dated April 6, 1976 and approved by HUD on June 25, 1976; and as more particularly described in the "Project Work Prograd', attached hereto. 9. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUN OF CONTRA COST4 CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR BY Stagy . . P. Kenny By ai an, Board of Supe sors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, ty Clerk .mss¢ _ By � Deputy ary t019 Dote to Contractor: (1) If a public agency, designate official Recommend d by Department capacity in public agency and attach - ^ a certified copy of the governing \1 �� body resolution authorizing execution (�B of this agreement. (2) If a corporation, 3ion} A. Dehaesus designate official capacity in business, execute acknowledgment form and affix Form Approved: County Counsel corporation seal. By Deputy 7� 00422 DJF:dh Microfilm^.d -•;th board order PAYMENT PROVISIONS 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Agreement. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the . total payment to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Agreement shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph S. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. All payments made under this Agreement shall be from Federal funds only. No general County funds shall be expended under this Agreement. If, for any reason whatsoever, County does not receive such Federal funds, Contractor agrees that County shall have no payment obligation hereunder. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement, County will pay Contractor an amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" contained in the Project Work Program. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974,'as published in the Federal Register, Volume 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended. All of the aforesaid documents are by this reference incorporated herein. Costs incurred in carrying out the project, whether charged to the project on a direct or an indirect basis, must be in conformance with the requirements of Federal Management Circular 744, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments", except to the extent inconsistent with the aforesaid documents. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands for payment in accordance with the above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 60 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified above. S. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor by County notifying Contractor in writing if (a) the Contractor has failed to perform its duties under this Agreement, or has insufficiently documented same, or (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demands for payment. 6. Payment Adjustments. (a) If any funds are expended by the Contractor in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, County may make necessary adjustments in payments to Contractor on account of such unauthorized or illegal expenditure. No such action taken by County shall entitle Contractor to reduce salaries, wages, or supportive services for any particpant or to expend less during the effective period of this Agreement than those sums called for in the Project Work Program. Any such reduction in expenditures may be deemed sufficient cause for termination. Contractor shall reimburse County for any allocated monies which are expended in violation of this Agreement or used.for unauthorized or illegal expenditures. -1- 00423 7. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually be incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. The Contractor shall provide County with a Certification of its Cost Report required under this Contract. Said Certification shall provide a full, true, and accurate accounting of the actual cost of services under this Contract, including all applicable expenditures, revenues, and indirect cost allocations, and any other . pertinent allocations which are in connection with Contractor's operations that are not a part of this Contract. B. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement). Any certified cost report or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than IS months from the termination date of this Agreement. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs-that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjust- ments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. 9. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph S. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Agreement. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement. WF:dh -2- 00424 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable to public agencies with respect-to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, including Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter V. Part 570, as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. Documentation of such compliance shall be made available for review by the County upon request. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Agreement are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Agreement and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Agreement for three years from the date of submission of the Annual Performance Report by the County to HUD, except as follows: (a) Records that are the subject of audit findings shall be retained for thiee years after such findings have been resolved. (b) Records for nonexpendable property which was acquired with Federal grant funds shall be retained for three years after its final disposition. (c) Records for any displaced person shall be retained for three years after he has received final payment. S. Termination. a. Failure to Perform. In the event the Contractor fails to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder and such failure of performance is not cured by the Contractor within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from the County, the County may in addition to any other remedies, complete the Contractor's obligations in any reasonable manner it chooses, take possession of any real or personal property associated with the project, and construct, operate or maintain the project as the County may deem necessary to fulfill requirements of the Federal Government. The Contractor agrees to reimburse the County for any costs or expenses incurred by the County because of said failure to perform and also agrees to convey title to any real property acquired by Contractor with project funds should County request such title. b. Cessation of Funding. In the event that Federal funding for this Agreement ceases, this Agreement is terminated. c. Failure by the Contractor to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the County thereunder. 6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein and in the "COOPERATION AGREEMENT, H.C.D.A. 1974" effective-January 20, 1976 and amendments relating thereto, if any, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. -i- 00425) 7. Further Specifications for Uper_ ating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Agreement, including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be modifications to this Agreement except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "Informal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Agreement, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee. S. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Agreements. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Project Mork Program may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such adminis- trative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Project Work Program. C. Extension of Term for Performance. without requiring Contractor to provide consideration in a ition to t at supporting this Agreement, the County of Contra Costa, through its Planning Director, may grant Contractor an extension of time for performance, beyond that time specified above under 'Term" (Paragraph 3). Any such extension must be in writing and shall be at the sole discretion of County. 9, Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Agreement shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Agreement. This Agreement is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11• Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Agreement be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Agreement is subject to modification to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Agreement as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby stooped from bringing any action for damages or enforce- ment arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions thereof. 13. Original Agreement. The original copy of this Agreement and of any modification thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Assignment. This Agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Agreement, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. IS. Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 0042 -2- r� 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest and will establish safeguards pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the attached "Assurances". 17. . Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confidentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 18, Indemnification. a. Contractor hereby waives all claims and recourse against the County including the right to contribution for loss or damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement except claims arising from the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents and employees. b. The Contractor shall defend and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees against and hold the same free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, costs, and/or expenses of liability due to, or arising out of, either in whole or in part, whether directly or in- directly, the organization, development, construction, operation, or maintenance of the Project except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents or employees. C. In the event County is named as co-defendant the Contractor shall notify the County of such fact and shall represent County in the legal action unless County undertakes to represent itself as co-defendant in such legal action in which event County shall bear its own litigation costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. d. This condition shall not terminate on the date specified in the Agreement but shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension of modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of, bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruc- tion of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurace coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written-notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurace as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so than other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 0042 1 _3_ V n i t 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to Contra Costa County Planning Department, P.O. Box 951, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Available Co ies. Copies of the County's Project documents (as specified in Paragraph 8. Project, of this Agreement), and all pertinent Federal statues, regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars applicable to this Agreement, shall be available at all times for inspection by the Contractor during regular business hours at the Offices of the Planning Department, Martinez, California. 22. Retained Powers. All powers not explicitly vested in the Contractor remain in the County. 23. Project Development. a. If the Project includes construction, the construction plans and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Contractor before construction is commenced. b. The Contractor shall secure completion of the construction work in accordance with the approved construction plans and specifications. c. If the Project includes acquisition of real property, the purchase price for such real property shall be determined from two County-approved appraisal reports prepared by competent appraisers or through proceedings in eminent domain.' The initial acquisition offer shall be the highest County-approved appraisal. The appraisal reports and qualifications of such appraisers shall be submitted for review and approval by the County before initiation of the acquisition procedure. Contractor agrees to furnish County preliminary title reports respecting such real property or such other evidence of title which is determined to be sufficient by County . Contractor agrees in negotiated purchases to correct prior to or at the close of escrow any defects of title which in the opinion of County might interfere with the operation of the Project. In condemnation actions such title defects must be eliminated by the final judgment. DJF/dh -4- 00428 ff��0QQ 428 ASSURANCES The Contractor, 'as recipient of funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, assures and certifies that: 1. It will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of Federal Management Circulars 74-4 and 74-7, as they relate to the County's Community Development Block Grant Program application, accept- ance and use of Federal funds for this Federally-assisted project. 2. It possesses legal authority to execute the Project. 3. Contractor, identified as "Applicant" below, will comply with: a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.I. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part I), which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, 'or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this assurance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant, this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance extended or for another purpose involving the pro- vision of similar services or benefits. b. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-284) as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community develop- ment in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; and will take action to affirmatively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services within the applicant's juris- _.diction. c. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR 570.601), which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Title I funds. d. Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunity in housing and nondiscrimin- ation in the sale or rental of housing built with Federal assistance. e. Executive Order 11246, and all regulations issued pursuant thereto . (24 CFR Part 130), which provides that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in all phases of employment during the performance of Federal or federally-assisted contracts. Such contractors and subcontractors shall take affirmative action to ensure fair treatment in employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruit- ment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. f. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. *4. Prior to the submission of the "Project Work Program", the following have been complied with: a. Citizens have been provided with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for the project, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other important project requirements; b. Citizens have been provided an adequate opportunity to participate in the development of the project and in the development of any revisions, changes, or amendments. -1- 00429 S. It will: a. Provide fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance in accordance with Sections 202, 203, and 204 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and applicable HUD regulations (24 CFR Part .42), to or for families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations displaced as a result of any acquisition of real property for an activity assisted under the program; b. Provide relocation assistance programs offering the services described in Section 2OS of the Act to such displaced families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations in the manner provided under applicable HUD regulations; c. Assure that, within a•reasonable time prior to displacement, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to such displaced families and individuals in accordance with Section 2O5(c)(3) of the Act, and that such housing will be available in the same range of choices to all such dis- placed persons regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income; d. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures provided for under HUD regulations; and e. Carry out the relocation process in such a manner as to provide such displaced persons with uniform and consistent services, including any services required to ensure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment to such displaced persons on account of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income. 6. It will: a. In acquiring real property in connection with the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, be guided to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the real property acquisition policies set out under Section 301 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) and the provisions of Section 302 thereof: b. Pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Section 303 and 304 of the Act; and c. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures under HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 42). 7. It will give HUD and the Comptroller General through any authorized representative access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. S. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political activity of employees. 9. It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296, relating to evaluation of flood hazards. 10. Its officer executing this Agreement: - a.' Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such act apply pursuant to this Part; and b. Is authorized and consents on behalf of the Contractor and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. *11. The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination o€-slums or blight. Where all or part of the Community Development Program activities are designed to meet'other Community Development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically described in the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. -2- 00430 12. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particuarly those with whom they have family, business, or other ties. 13. _It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. 14. It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such require- ments. (*Assurances 4 and 11 are applicable only if Contractor is a city.) -3- 00431 EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CON-IUNITY DEVELOP14EIlT PROGRAM 1976-1977 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM A. PKOJELT DESCRIPTION Restoration of the historic Joel Clayton home in Clayton, including the electrical and plumbing system, provision of on and off site utilities, and, should funds allow, the installation of a fire sprinkler and/or security protection system B. PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE Time Schedule on a month-by-month basis for the above Project indicating when major activity items are expected to 'be undertaken and completed. Start Complete Building,-Moving and Foundation Work June 1976 July 1976 Restoration of Electrical and Plumbing System August 1976 October 1976 Provision of On and Off-Site Utilities October 1976 December 1976 ' Installation of Fire Sprinkler and/or Security Protection System (should funds allow) October 1976 December 1976; C. PROJECT ADI•1I11ISTRATIOII Contractor should indicate who will be responsible for administering the Work Program. Ron Brazill, City Manager City of Clayton 6054 Main Street Clayton, California 94517 00432 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM D. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor should indicate, where applicable, what performance standards (details of project implementation) will be applied in implementing the Work Program. The contractor shall obtain all required permits prior to commencement of the activities described herein. The restoration will conform to all applicable codes. E. PROGRAM I.30NITORING 1. Contractor's staff will meet at least once per quarter with appropriate County staff and Community Development Advisory Council representatives where applicable to discuss progress of the Contractor toward achieving stated work program objectives and to assist Contractor's staff in solving problems. 2. Contractor shall maintain and submit'i1uaitcity "Progress Reports to the County Planning Department. 3. Contractor shall maintain and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports on work performed by sub-contractors. F. GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition. Contractor shall not allow staff overtime rage rates under this Contract. - 2 - 00433 PROJECT WOR!, PROGRAM G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expendi- tures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $6,500 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUdT $ 6,500 2. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning Director or his designee. 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presecribed by County. 3 - 00434 • , CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 1976-1977 H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: 37 City of Clayton PAGE 1 OF 1 BUDGET PERIOD: July 1, 1976-June 30, 1977 Original X Amendment 116. (a) (b) (c) (d) BUDGET ITEM CD FUNDS - $ + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - $' Restoration of Joel Clayton Home $6,500 0 $ 6,500 Fees and Permits Restoration of electrical J and plumbing systems Provision of on and off-site utilities Installation of Fire Sprinkler and/or Security Protection System (should Funds allow) e TOTAL $6,500 $ 0 $6,500 NOTES: (a) Detailed categories expanded from Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures pursuant to FMC 74-4 (b) Items that are eleigibile to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds (see HUD Rules & Regulation). (c) Estimate of other necessary expenditures that cannot be funded with CD monies; and indication of anticipated sources, assurances and timing of other funds. (d) Sum of (b) and (c) above including both Community Development and non-Comnunity Development funds. (e) Contract Payment Limit for CO project. 0043 PROJECT AGREEMENT C%04Uh'ITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 1. Agreement Identification. Number 32 & 33 Department: County Planning Department Subject: Allocation of Federal funding under.Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Ambrose Recreation and Park District Address: 125 Memorial Way Pittsburg, CA 94565 3. Term. The effective date of this Agreement is SEP 2 8 1976 and it terminates Juni 30. 1977 unless sooner terminated as provided herein, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 4. Allocation Payment Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Agreement shall not exceed S.40.400 5. County's Obligations. County shall make those allocation payments to the contractor described in the "Payment Provisions" attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all terms, conditions, and assurances con- tained or incorporated herein. 6. General Conditions and Assurances. This Agreement is subject to the "General Conditions" and the "Assurances" attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work as described in and in accordance with-"the "Project Work Program" attached hereto, which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms, conditions and assurances contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Agreement implements in whole or in part the following described project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: That Project as described in the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program Application dated April 6, 1976 and approved by HUD on June 25, 1976; and as more particularly described in the "Project Work Prograd', attached hereto. 9. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTS CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR By J. P. Kenny B a' an, Bo.*d o STty ors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, Clerk President, Board of Directors BY �� Deputy V01 Note to Contractor: (1) If a public agency, designate official Recommende Depar/went capacity in public agency and attach a certified copy of the governing By .��' body resolution authorizing execution of this agreement. (2) If a corporation, nthony A. Dehaesus designate official capacity in business, execute acknowledgment form and affix Form Approved: County Counsel corporation seal. By s%��vf�G-/•. ice!/-�� Deputy 00113G DJF:dh Microfilmed with board order PAYMENT PROVISIONS 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Agreement. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Agreement shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph S. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Agreement. All payments made under this Agreement shall be from Federal funds only. No general County funds shall be expended under this Agreement. If, for any reason whatsoever, County does not receive such Federal funds, Contractor agrees that County shall have no payment obligation hereunder. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement, County will pay Contractor an amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" contained in the Project Work Program. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with all Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as published in the Federal Register, Volume 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended. All of the aforesaid documents are by this reference incorporated herein. Costs incurred in carrying out the project, whether charged to the project on a direct or an indirect basis, must be in conformance with the requirements of Federal Management Circular 74-4, "Cost Principles Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments", except to the extent inconsistent with the aforesaid documents. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands for payment in accordance with the above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 60 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually- rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified above. S. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor by County notifying Contractor in writing if (a) the Contractor has failed to perform its duties under this Agreement, or has insufficiently documented same, or (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demands for payment. 6. Payment Adjustments. (a) If any funds are expended by the Contractor in violation of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, County may make necessary adjustments in payments to Contractor on account of such unauthorized or illegal expenditure. No such action taken by County shall entitle Contractor to reduce salaries, wages, or supportive services for any particpant or to expend less during the effective period of this Agreement than those sums called for in the Project Work Program. Any such reduction in expenditures may be deemed sufficient cause for termination. Contractor shall reimburse County for any allocated monies which are expended in violation of this Agreement or used for unauthorized or illegal expenditures. -1_ ��43'7 7. Cost Report and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Agreement, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement. If said cost report shows that 'the allowable costs that have actually be incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. The Contractor shall provide County with a Certification of its Cost Report required under this Contract. Said Certification shall provide a full, true, and accurate accounting of the actual cost of services under this Contract, including all applicable expenditures, revenues, and indirect cost allocations, and any other pertinent allocations which are in connection with Contractor's operations that are not a part of this Contract. 8. Audits. . The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement). Any certified cost report' or audit required by Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Agreement. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Agreement exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjust- ments made pursuant to Paragraph 7. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Agreement. 9. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 8. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Agreement. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement. DJ F_dh -2- 00438 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. Com2liance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable to public agencies with respect-to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, Federal regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, including Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter V. Part 570, as published in the Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 220, Wednesday, November 13, 1974, as may be revised and amended; and which are incorporated herein by reference. Documentation of such compliance shall be made available for review by the County upon request. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Agreement are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Agreement and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Agreement for three years from the date of submission of the Annual Performance Report by the County to HUD, except as follows: (a) Records that are the subject of audit findings shall be retained for three years after such findings have been resolved. (b) Records for nonexpendable property which was acquired with Federal grant funds shall be retained for three years after its final disposition. (c) Records for any displaced person shall be retained for three years after he has received final payment. S. Termination. a. Failure to Perform. In the event the Contractor fails to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder and such failure of performance is not cured by the Contractor within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from the County, the County may in addition to any other remedies, complete the Contractor's obligations in any reasonable manner it chooses, take possession of any real or personal property associated with the project, and construct, operate or maintain the project as the County may deem necessary to fulfill requirements of the Federal Government. The Contractor agrees to reimburse the County for any costs or expenses incurred by the County because of said failure to perform and also agrees to convey title to any real property acquired by Contractor with project funds should County request such title. b. Cessation of Funding. In the event that Federal funding for this Agreement ceases, this Agreement is terminated. c. Failure by the Contractor to perform properly any of its obligations under this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the County thereunder. 6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein and in the "COOPERATION AGREMENT, H.C.D.A. 1974" effective January 20, 1976 and amendments relating thereto, if any, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. -1- 00439 7. Further Specifications for operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Agreement, including but not limited to monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in written "Informal Agreements" entered between the Contractor and the County. Such "Informal Agreements" when entered shall not be modifications to this Agreement except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Further, any "rnformal Agreement" entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Agreement, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. "Informal Agreements" may be approved for, and executed on behalf of the County by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Agreements. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Project Work Program may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such adminis- trative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Project work Program. C. Extension of Term for Performance. Without requiring Contractor to provide consideration in addition to t at supporting this Agreement, the County of Contra Costa, through its Planning Director, may grant Contractor an extension of time for performance, beyond that time specified above under 'Term" (Paragraph 3). Any such extension must be in writing and shall be at the sole discretion of County. g. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Agreement shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Agreement is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Agreement. This Agreement is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11• Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Agreement be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Agreement is subject to modification to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to the disputes provision contained herein, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Agreement, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Agreement as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby stooped from bringing any action for damages or enforce- ment arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions thereof. 13. Original Agreement. The original copy of this Agreement and of any modification thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Assignment. This Agreement binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Agreement, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15• Independent Contractor Status. This Agreement is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. -2- 00' 440 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon Edemand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest and will establish safeguards pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the attached "Assurances". 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confidentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 16. Indemnification. a. Contractor hereby waives all claims and recourse against the County including the right to contribution for loss or damage to persons or property arising from, growing out of or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement except claims arising from the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents and employees. b. The Contractor shall defend and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees against and hold the same free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, damages, losses, costs, and/or expenses of liability due to, or arising out of, either in whole or in part, whether directly or in- directly, the organi=ation, development, construction, operation, or maintenance of the Project except for liability arising out of the concurrent or sole negligence of County, its officers, agents or employees. C. In the event County is named as co-defendant the Contractor shall notify the County of such fact and shall represent County in the legal action unless County undertakes to represent itself as co-defendant in such legal action in which event County shall bear its own litigation costs, expenses, and attorney's fees. d. This condition shall not terminate on the date specified in the Agreement but shall remain in full force and effect. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension of modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruc- tion of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurace coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written-notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurace as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 01441 20. Notices. all notices provided for by this Agreement shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County-shall be addressed to Contra Costa County Planning Department, P.O. Box 951, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Available'Co ies. Copies of the County's Project documents (as specified in Paragraph 8, Project, of this Agreement), and all pertinent Federal statues, regulations, guidelines, bulletins, and circulars applicable to this Agreement, shall be available at all times for inspection by the Contractor during regular business hours at the Offices of the Planning Department, Martinez, California. 22. Retained Powers. All powers not explicitly vested in the Contractor remain in the County. 23. Project Development. a. If the Project includes construction, the construction'plans and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by the Contractor before construction is commenced. b. The Contractor shall secure completion of the construction work in accordance with the approved construction plans and specifications. c. If the Project includes acquisition of real property, the purchase price for such real property shall be determined from two County-approved appraisal reports prepared by competent appraisers or through proceedings in eminent domain. The initial acquisition offer shall be the highest County-approved appraisal. The appraisal reports and qualifications of such appraisers shall be submitted for review and approval by the County before initiation of the acquisition procedure. Contractor agrees to furnish County preliminary title reports respecting such real property or such other evidence of title which is determined to be sufficient by County . Contractor agrees in negotiated purchases to correct prior to or at the close of escrow any defects of title which in the opinion of County might interfere with the operation of the Project. In condemnation actions such title defects must be eliminated by the final judgment. DJF/dh -4- 00442 ASSURANCES The Contractor, as recipient of funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, assures and certifies that: 1. It will comply with the regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of Federal Management Circulars 74-4 and 74-7, as they relate to the County's Community Development Block Grant Program application, accept- ance and use of Federal funds for this Federally-assisted project. 2. It possesses legal authority to execute the Project. 3. Contractor, identified as "Applicant" below, will comply with: a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.I. 88-352) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR Part I), which provides that no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance and will immediately take any measures necessary to effectuate this assurance. If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial assistance extended to the applicant, this assurance shall obligate the applicant, or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance extended or for another purpose involving the pro- vision of similar services or benefits. b. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (P.L. 90-284) as amended, administering all programs and activities relating to housing and community develop- ment in a manner to affirmatively further fair housing; and will take action to affirmatively further fair housing in the sale or rental of housing, the financing of housing, and the provision of brokerage services within the applicant's juris- diction. c. Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (24 CFR 570.601), which provides that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, national origin or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under, any program or activity funded in whole or in part with Title I funds. d. Executive Order 11063 on equal opportunity in housing and nondiscrimin- ation in the sale or rental of housing built with Federal assistance. e. Executive Order 11246, and all regulations issued pursuant thereto . (24 CFR Part 130), which provides that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin in all phases of employment during the performance of Federal or federally-assisted contracts. Such contractors and subcontractors shall take affirmative action to ensure fair treatment in employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruit- ment advertising; layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training and apprenticeship. f: Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, requiring that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given lower income residents of the project area and 'contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in, or owned in substantial part by, persons residing in the area of the project. *4. Prior to the submission of the "Project Work Program", the following have been complied with: a. Citizens have been provided with adequate information concerning the amount of funds available for the project, the range of activities that may be undertaken, and other important project requirements; b. Citizens have been provided an adequate opportunity to participate in the development of the project and in the development of any revisions, changes, or amendments. —1— 00443 mop I S. It will: a. Provide fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance in accordance with Sections 202, 203, and 204 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 and applicable HUD regulations (24 CFR Part -42), to or for families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations displaced as a result of any acquisition of real property for an activity assisted under the program; b. Provide relocation assistance programs offering the services described in Section 205 of the Act to such displaced families, individuals, partnerships, corporations or associations in the manner provided under applicable HUD regulations; c. Assure that, within a reasonable time prior to displacement, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement dwellings will be available to such displaced families and individuals in accordance with Section 205(c)(3) of the Act, and that such housing will be available in the same range of choices to all such dis- placed persons regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income; d. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures provided for under HUD regulations; and e. Carry out the relocation process in such a manner as to provide such displaced persons with uniform and consistent services, including any services required to ensure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treatment to such displaced persons on account of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or source of income. 6. It will: a. In acquiring real property in connection with the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, be guided to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the real property acquisition policies set out under Section 301 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) and the provisions of Section 302 thereof: b. Pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Section 303 and 304 of the Act; and c. Inform affected persons of the benefits, policies, and procedures under HUD regulations (24 CFR Part 42). 7. It will give HUD and the Comptroller General through any authorized representative access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the grant. S. It will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act which limits the political activity of employees. 9. It will comply with the provisions of Executive Order 11296, relating to evaluation of flood hazards. 10. Its officer executing this Agreement: a. Consents to assume the status of a responsible Federal official under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 insofar as the provisions of such act apply pursuant to this Part; and b. Is authorized and consents on behalf of the Contractor and himself to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal courts for the purpose of enforcement of his responsibilities as such an official. ;11. The Community Development Program has been developed so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low or moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of-slums or blight. Where all or part of the Community Development Program activities are designed to meet other Community Development needs having a particular urgency, such needs are specifically described in the application under the Community Development Plan Summary. -2- 00441 ,e 12. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using positions for a purpose that is or gives the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particuarly those with whom they have family,-business, or other ties. 13. It will comply with all requirements imposed by HUD concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements approved in accordance with Federal Management Circular 74-7. 14. It will administer and enforce the labor standards requirements set forth in Section 570.605 and HUD regulations issued to implement such require- ments. (*Assurances 4 and 11 are applicable only if Contractor is a city.) 00445 F, • EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1976-1977 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Rehabilitation of portions of an existing park in the low and moderate income area of West Pittsburg. Activity will include paving, installation of a patio cover, installation of fencing, repair of pool filters and water canal pumps, and installation . of permanent picnic tables. B. PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE Time Schedule on a month-by-month basis for the above Project indicating when major activity items are expected to be undertaken and completed. Work Item Start Date Completion Date General Renovation October 1, 1976 December 31, 1976 Work as listed under Performance Standards C. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Contractor should indicate who will be responsible for administering the Work Program. Edward Spencer District Administrator Ambrose Recreation and Park District 125 Memorial Way Pittsburg, California 94565 (415) 458-1601 - 1 - 00446 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM 0. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor should indicate, where applicable, what performance standards (details of project implementation) will be applied in implementing the Work Program. Project will include, at a miminum, the following items: (1) Paving and expansion of parking area; (2) Installation of a patio cover; (3) Purchase and installation of cyclone fencing; (4) Repair and replacement of pool filters; (S) Replace pump for water canal system; (6) Replacement of 20 picnic tables. Contractor will obtain all necessary permits prior to initiating any phase of the renovation activity and comply with all Federal regula- tions pertaining to construction contracts of this size. E. PROGRAM MONITORING 1. Contractor's staff will meet at least once per quarter with appropriate County staff and Community Development Advisory Council representatives where applicable to discuss progress of the Contractor toward achieving stated work program objectives and to assist Contractor's staff in solving problems. 2. Contractor shall maintain and submit Quarterly Progress Reports to the County Planning Department. 3. Contractor shall maintain and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports on work performed by sub-contractors. F. GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition. Contractor shall not allow staff overtime wage rates under this Contract. - 2 - 0044 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expendi- tures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY A14OUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $20,000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $20,000 2. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning Director or his designee. 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presecribed by County. - 3 - 00445 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 1976-1977 H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: 32 Ambrose Recreation PAGE t OF t and Park District BUDGET PERIOD: June 1976 - June 1977 Original x Amendment No. (a) (b) (c) (d) BUDGET ITEM CO FUNDS - $ + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - Rehabilitation of Ambrose Park $20,000 $ 20,000. ° Paving and expansion of parking area ° Installation of patio cover ° Pmrchase and installa- tion of a cyclone fence ° Repair and replace pool filter ° Replace pump for water canal system ° Replace 20 picnic tables e TOTAL $20,000 $ $20,000. NOTES: (a) Detailed categories expanded from Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures pursuant to FMC 74-4 (b) Items that are eleigibile to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds (see HUD Rules & Regulation). (c) Estimate of other necessary expenditures that cannot be funded with CO monies; and indication of anticipated sources, assurances and timing of other funds. (d) Sum of (b) and (c) above including both Community Development and non-Community Development funds. (e) Contract Payment Limit for CO project. 004491.1 i ;S r EXHIBIT A CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1976-1977 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Acquisition of land for a small.park and recreation center in the West Pittsburg area. Activity will include feasibility study for acquisition and renovation of an existing school site in the West Pittsburg area. Pending the findings of the feasibility study, necessary appraisals and preliminary plans will be prepared as a first step in the acquisition and renovation process. B. PROJECT TIME SCHEDULE Time Schedule on a month-by-month basis for the above Project indicating when major activity items are expected to be undertaken and completed. - Work Item Start Date Completion Date Feasibility Study October 1, 1976 November 1, 1976 Appraisals November 1, 1976 November 15, 1976 Preliminary Plans November 1, 1976 January 31, 1977 C. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION Contractor should indicate who will be responsible for administering the Work Program. Edward Spencer District Administrator Ambrose Recreation and Park District 125 Memorial Way Pittsburg, California 94565 (41S) 455-1601 - 1 - 00450 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM D. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Contractor should indicate, where applicable, what performance standards (details of project implementation) will be applied in implementing the Work Program. Any professional contracts will be let in compliance with Appendix 0 of FMC 74-7 and other applicable Federal regulations including the Section 3 requirements of HUD. Appraisals will be made in compliance with HUD regulations and contractor will contact the County Public Works Department for specific guidelines pertaining to appraisals. Any plans for and any actual construction shall comply with State laws and regulations, governing access to handicapped persons to public facilities. E. PROGRAM MONITORING 1. Contractor's staff will meet at least once per quarter with appropriate County staff and Community Development Advisory Council representatives where applicable to discuss progress of the Contractor toward achieving stated work program objectives and to assist Contractor's staff in solving problems. 2. Contractor shall maintain and submit Quarterly Progress Reports to the County Planning Department. 3. Contractor shall maintain and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports on work performed by sub-contractors. F. GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition. Contractor shall not allow staff overtime wage rates under this Contract. 2 00451 v r- PROJECT WORK PROGRAM G- BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDII!)RES 1• Contractor shall accordance with tProvide services under this Contract in he fnllnwinn t ,rind} of a11', -hl rr ndi F• GENERAL OPERATIONS Overtime Prohibition. Contractor shall not allow staff overtime wage rates under this Contract. _ 2 _ 00451 PROJECT WORK PROGRAM G. BUDGET OF ESTIMATED PROGRAM EXPENDITURES 1. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance with the following budget of allowable expendi- tures: LINE NO. PROGRAM ACTIVITY AMOUNT 1. ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY 2. PUBLIC WORKS, FACILITIES, SITE IMPROVEMENTS $20,000 3. CODE ENFORCEMENT 4. CLEARANCE, DEMOLITION, REHABILITATION 5. REHABILITATION LOANS AND GRANTS 6. SPECIAL PROJECTS FOR ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED 7. PAYMENT FOR LOSS OF RENTAL INCOME 8. DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY 9. PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 10. PAYMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SHARES 11. COMPLETION OF URBAN RENEWAL PROJECTS 12. RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND ASSISTANCE 13. PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $20,000 2. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, each line item budget amount specified above may be changed with prior written authorization from the County Planning Director or his designee. 3. The above schedule is subject to a Contractor's Detailed Expenditure Schedule, which shall sub-categorize in specific detail the above line item categories and amounts and be kept on file with the County Planning Department, in the form and manner presecribed by County. - 3 - MR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM, 1976-1977 H. CONTRACTOR'S DETAILED EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE CONTRACTOR: ACTIVITY NUMBER: 33 Ambrose P.ecreation PAGE 1 OF 1 and Park District BUDGET PERIOD: July 1976 - June 30, 1977 Original x Amendment No. BUDGET ITEM CD FUNDS - S + OTHER FUNDS - $ = TOTAL - S Feasibility Study $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Appraisals 1,000 1,000 Preliminary Plans 15,000 15,000 e TOTAL $20,000 $ $20,000 NOTES: (a) Detailed categories expanded from Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures pursuant to FMC 74-4 (b) Items that are eleigibile to be funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds (see HUD Rules & Regulation). (c) Estimate of other necessary expenditures that- cannot be funded with CD monies; and indication of anticipated sources, assurances - and timing of other funds. (d) Sum of (b) and (c) above including both Community Development and non-Community Development funds. (e) Contract Payment Limit for CD project. 00453 f T � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1197, In the Matter of Approval of Contract With Martin Fink, Ph.D., for Psychological Evaluation of Probation Department Referrals The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County a contract with Martin Fink, Ph.D. for psychological evaluation of probation referrals from September 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977 at a cost not to exceed $1,750.00. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Sup yrvisors on the date aforesaid. Orig- Probation Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Probation Officer Supervisors Attn: W. C. Donavan, Jr. offuced this 28thday of September 19 6 Contractor c/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller _ County Administrator B A Deputy Clerk 71 Craig H-24 ane ism 00454 SHORT FORA SERVICE CONTRACT • a 1. :.ontract �u_t,Ci1'icatiun. Number 35040-308-2310 Oepartment: Probation Subject: Psychological Evaluations 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the follcwing named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor- Martin Fink, Ph.D. Ca-pacify: . Psychologist Address- 1515 Ygnacio Valley Road Walnut Creek, CA 94598 3. Tern. The effective date of this Contract is September 1, 1976 and it terninazes June 30, 1977 unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Termination. This Contract may be terminated by the County, at its sole discretion, upon five-day advance written notice thereof to the Contractor. 5. Pav;:lent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed S 1,750.00 6. County's Obligations. In consideration of Contractor`s provision of services as described below, and subject to the payment limit expressed herein, County shall pay Contractor, upon submission of a properly documented demand for payment in the manner and fora prescribed by County (Derand Form D-15) and upon approval of such demand by the head of the County Departrent for which this Contract is made or his designee, according to the following fee schedule: ( ) hour; or FEE RATE: $ 175 per service unit: (x) session, as defined belay; or ( ) calendar (insert day, week or month) NOT TO EXCEED a total of 10 service unit(s). 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide the following described services: For Probation Department referrals the evaluator shall review the Probation file, interview the referral, the family and Probation Officer; administer and score a battery of five to six psychological tests and submit a report to the Probation Department. S. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. 9. indaimnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and e.;,oloyees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the eperations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligence or otherwise, of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or e,.ployees, or any other person or entity. 10. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: None 11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CON—IRA COSTA, CALIFOR41A CONTRACTOR f By P. Kenn C airman, goorcf of arv,. Designee Reco•-:mended by Departtrsen Designate official capacity (Forza approved by County Counsel) Designee 0045.5 Microfilmed with board order 3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing the Chairman to Execute Modification Number 605 to the County's C:ETA Title VI Grant. IT IS BY THE BOARD ( ED that the Chairman is MnHMZED to execute Modification No. 605 to the County's CETA Title VI grant (grant n06-5004-60) with the U. S. Department of Iabor, extending the grant termination date from September 30 to December 31, 1976. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976 Crig: Civil Service cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of supervisors affixed this28thday of September _ 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk eyTd) �.' Deputy Clerk ne M. "Jeu eld H-24 3/76 15m I € " . ,`.: , ' ... .. ..._ .„:- ... ,�. ... � �. ., t�f'-..^lr�-fits . _ f ;-• , ,. '.FOS i'• S. Depart�-;a.^.t Of Lamac;Cssurt5' O; Contra Ctssta -- i•:plcyr)e nt and Training Administration PsimitListratiotn Buildirg , •i 5�) Golden Cate Avenue, Bax oMAbez CA 9553' ; S n Franc_isro ;CA '94102` _ l t:ls+tr;z 12 'i tt I ti *p:lt 2 lF.!�3 '•t tf( fitl , t x';,t:t^rJt. of-I i • *' -------• - it �s-If.3 a, tc`(+i1C1+ 2b (TIiS2L0 «7'�s �t.r.! Prw t of Rso'I.EOUA.t. COUCr� COSCB .,- 1:.rf!.P •c: oa t0 A s:Si+�" !.'S v attLt?c.tCaC' LOUGiYS•f!O) 6: 'his c yi""a._aL�tR �inarj.L�C I'.�:�J?7 TiisA z,Z i saC2.T�A•f..SrW vSw-255't.c'A.•' S?.+:�:��.SR a;t:}:'.L lwttiA. P-.GRUMIT r�j.363 Y ' 1}�is Gran a �triRt coyr:s t` p"_tto3 (u r 7 iraznJanua? Ir2475 to Decembdz 31 'I976 S.'O$l.lGfliltl3; Tr-ta 0d tz=l -®does n3! c:.3,'iy gIS..I41 (tPt at:iarJ S t0 (nrw=IntifJ r C- TITLE Ahl!) FJSCAL. YEAR Tt7LE PISLAE_YC • TOTitL' -_- • In:ratit t t Di\actix.�:y Tn LE In Ir4iiatls - I - ' Idiy.ent L Ql}sct �• �- 7y TL` YJ - Ia:e "' 5,773,036 5,773,036 _ Disctc:ixz.7 ', 12021.;531 1,OZI,531' Torr.L 6,744,567 6,744,567. D.GRAjrr-A'..L.*JI:•=£!IT su3_tet t�a at a6;tit� of no: �� s�itu.c a lca: •'.c+Lr i ^rtY+S?Y.CO,IIIA �>• „-G:tA+:l sir i:Y ' ':. /.► lavt:D f.!r Tt,C GRwTITCt UY James P. Benny -�51 IITr.0 �— _.. • Gain.-n, Board Of Supervisors ® U� Kenny t,, -----Microfilmed "M Eioaid-order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Execution of Modification $609 of the County's CETA Title I Grant #06-5004-10 with the U. S. Department of Labor IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the Grant Signature Sheet for Modification $609 of the County's CETA Title I Grant u'06-5004-10 with the U. S. Department of Labor, thereby decreasing the amount of the federal grant by $280,852. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, •1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Sup crvisors on the date oforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Human Resources Agency Attn: Contracts & Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28thlay of September , 1976 County Auditor-Controller County Manpower Project Director J. R. OL.SSON, Clerk U. S. Department of Labor Deputy Clerk MO aig 00405 Hp2ag/76 ISm U� 1ii1•\1,tMli.t r.. (1. 14 � .•_t• 1.rwwwwY�irO ri^I.f tiylY.� �41`�..�.�I.t.fY. !.%IVi i. GRANT S26NATCRE SHEET � 06-5004-10 � HOD 609 ...,•..... t_ :L Department of Labor County of Contra Costa Employment and TrAinn ny Arlmini tration Board of Supervisors 450 Golden Cate Avenue- 651 Pine Street c, r I Martinez CA 94553.: I-sis St u; is ra:t.od ix-bT eze u:iw: »:us or A=cri,:a.Cr,wt-utast o!Lu,:r.!•:,a;-w.c i.�ar.-.• z1gazi0q.icrc;u t.: to a:Gacr z:d rv... «/sws,,...1,.� C,C.C.jiog 4__qf S_upervfsors leminirter tcrer--ed to as Gra:t•:c The Crt ltd awtt:to operate:Co:n.-4her«y:• sad Training Yrcgca=is aa::.rau6x%i;h tdt p:'a•ivam or thi:x m ia-ut. tb.: ?Lutpower Plan and x»S:acral and sxciai a waazes a::a in"td he.---".2. A.GItA'+T PEPdOJ • TAu G:+ut r,reeracai covers the period rtr..)froom 9-1-74 to 9-30-76 This action 0 irxteases E3 decteaus ❑does not ehanq:the r:.0.`ral obastion lar Stant by troksi.rnoy S 250.852 to +r•rq s S_071_75k S � x r—TITLE A`7D FISCAL YEAR TITLEf#=AC WCa t _ 6 SUPP TQ Tom saw wsaw 64,386 2,187,30012,480,736 339,332, 5;071,754 • �K th.rTrt.G.Yy =L E Us . t1.tV,.a OfAK ZiTCE trt Barr Tose 64,386 12,187,300 12,480,736339,33 I 5,071,754 D.C&R.\'T Jtt=MgFNT S 3,100.920 ti,alul .luad aW:rn.tt.rhr:2r a v./at::to rraMl�'tp ani d.s no:ramtir4:c a&4-1 obrptioo.j • w�IVYJ.0.4M 7ML 1-20..We wr�MJVrO•Y..1Nv,... 11..L� r7' _ 1..1.. p oymen sII r" Board of Supervisors' U.S. Department of Labor Contra Costa County S.C.t+Ai V..G 'D..tC SIG Yh! J D Kenn JaTE. r ' Lf r�drt)r jSEP 2 6 976_ Chairman, f SupeMsm .(r•rr 00459 • M;crofilmrd with Board order r ` In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of Authorization for Revision of the County's CETA Title I Grant Application to the U. S. Department of Labor for FY 76-77 The Board having authorized on August 31, 1976, the execution and submission of a CETA Title I Grant Funding Application for FY 76-77 to the U. S. Department of Labor, and The Board having considered the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, regarding required changes in said Grant Application to reduce the total amount of the requested CETA funding from $2,779,585 to $2,513,514 (representing $2,232,662 in new grant monies and $280,852 in estimated carry-over monies from the County's current CETA Title I grant), IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said changes are APPROVED, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the revised Grant Application documents required for resubmission to the U. S. Department of Labor. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Attn: Contracts S Grants Unit cc: County Administrator affixed this 28tWay of_ SeDtember , 1976 County Auditor-Controller County Manpower Project Director U. S. Department of Labor . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey Deputy Clerk 1Aa aig 00460 RH 24.j/7615m pup•rr•....t r.s ;-._sa'ts J rr -. Arra. .. nJZIP. FEDERAL �`i�3i �.t �,C cmirs 29-803 arrcrtA 74062412 1_trrE r o-e Aas•Lt. i «A;T t17a r Fr,J.,"I:Jt121\ tv:rtYt ►• Ga:: Yia. w...t. or las I.CT:Ox !.^i'llr�:t.G1 CATION 1�}'•a• �•• 76 9,•••,r• tz.R ),:z•.•.:a 19 J6lOIt13 1)t6•i ah 601171:WnS V; V�T:`S (3;',) 1 ra'i t•e,y,ssU nn;a Cr i£:.rAl nn;".-t A. LEGAL APPLIC.ANTIPMPiLx: :+ Ft? V."I o T LOcL. ►OEttltftC-tliGt{ 11O. a.A.-;A;C nt ho— Contra Costa County Board of Supervisor 94600-509; >_"..ttat+saUSA County Manpower Project f. t.scrroup.o.E= 2401-D Stanwell Drive, #440 PY7 •. I,Jus1k 11 171. 1213121 i.CAI Concord . Emmy : Contra Costa c►"" ►.TOLL California Irra'" L s:,:. i,u►t.aa: 94520 f'rtrrrJ' CETA Title I :.C--.ad Phnom tSaw fiance Van Huffel Gsta:y} t Irz.ttowr oa (415)671-4239 0 7.TIT'_AND DESCRIFT40N OF ArFucANrs PR7JECT E.TYPE OF AP?Lt�+ 1Tl7.Et Ii IFN'r A Program to provide vocational and pre-vocational training and counseling, and placement services for a.t:.,tt r.Jrrar Isyarilrl: unemployed, underemployed, and economically disadvan- taged residents of the Counts (excluding the City L1.s,6t.tt►�,� Richmond). C++»+cS Saz.r a?rrs?r✓tt If.49 1 V.TYPE OF ASSISTMIr-E 1,13311t Cam rl.tat,acs o irSat;st.sutat I rsti t-C+ ar Fath rrso- r Glosn :arwtr[eNref,1 I A-1-i .� 10.AREA OF PROJECT iup;,CT c c.ncr al caw.caa.:.ts. 11. ES 11A:?E:+ tIJIA. I2.TYPE OF APP:ICA51CIN S atsL rL:3 CER OF FtR«✓NS !-N' G-ktrgr.w t-Lfrat:tt i:F Contra Costa County BENEFITING 1r annt D to ix+tlin (excluding the City of Richmond) I 1800 r.!"a::roPrrrtt 1tt:r�� 13. PROPOStA FUNDING 11L CnNazt!,'=-+G.T_DISTRICTS OF: '25 TYPI: OF GY.At:Ct fiar 2StzrIII) (lrtwc:r D21sts f-rnau (SPtci:yl:_ a.Fi.J'tfi:L f s 7 S t�{a.X"►:1.;+.�7 !. P%J:E«? s„ «-itt.„x ttrt,tos N/Aa.A nI:&NTi ,tJ 1 7 $ 9 r 7 .p-:,tri:ti t.ars4:a t- STATE 15, FROJEC: SART17. P+^.CJtc: 1-:a.ts:ub6r. DAT„. 2'rcr'.aw:b Ih'r DUUT1ON F.rtrr rRyr r f.I4::L rd 1976/10/1 12 Ma'zas 3r++ic I•I:r-fr)n -,n s.OT1t,Ri .M 1 2S, t�.lu'.TS,^.a:.Tr l7 Yvr .tawtL l!ar 113.EXI=IN✓ Mzt;AL IDESTIFIV.TEON Www `ca EZ SeEk-ITTED TO L rT:s s 2 513,514 .as i FEOEF.AL AZENCY1. 197618131 ( 2C FEAERAL AGENCY TO FiECEiVE iRrqu : tticsss.ca,.S:rsa.ZIP aa&1 +<l.P.F.ttluTfS AOA_D Department of Labor, Emp. & Trng. Admin., San Francisco, CA 94102 !r tJ' Yos p t1> L'»bw!01”I—IT11,.116 sM L_it rga'v.t trt obd)Or u"t a.9S this t "ruza..0 , e.-w,c::y iM1, dor.- a t,U i. oil W..[t+0'3t%:araC, b&;Wntuts ar'tiyaauus 04 lift,i+.Y.AH+ it$ tCA=.C. rfoc» a::44K: THE trot rad tunct, W dzc—_'.i": tat Nra 1 APPL'C&NT t daif #&�Zom'd " I" 1„er" bcgr tt CERTIFIES j Lb t::i:,a:a+1 VIt ant.»t=m.lr Ol State Clearinghouse rA THAT J• f1.t0+ru spa s., stoax.=tt R L`.4 w sl- C� Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) .y! amu It s:7'+r�- Qt ..i :..1 _ .^l s.T L IrE A�?T1TLE s. -MTUr. c WE St«x:P R CEFTiFTiNG aures P. Denny, Chairman �"j ; P. Kenny }':w „r�u• , REPBE• Board of Supervisors b"" 111 }9 76/$/31 „ StNTATTVE .- 2<AGEH:X 2tAFiE TAF?L1CJr )''sr s.x:A�,1G SC!+ U. S. Department of Labor F=n. r ; .. e m t- RECEIVED 14 :6.ORC.ANtZJITIONA4. UNIT J.AOAl1NIS1,V.TIVL Wrl E yL ra7ERXt A?�IIC.tTI7K o `Region Iii Area I ^ 1D=ttT:r:;r:tart FEDEa's• G?AxT 45C Golden Gate Ave6ue, San Francisco IDLN17ICATION :A10EN 1 S.`.. r:lti7tr'C, i Y" ..a.tA Lot j 34. }...,r ( f s 2,513-5141 .CO 1 3:- ACT:CN DATE l` 11, i {ArT►*NG I i 76!Jf011 � )1,fi53FCTT9 t oat,;,,A�; ,rJ•-i C-NTA,-T. FOR X1ZtttZ!tai IWORMA.1 3i - Yti 171 t\w.., a� i.it.l•+.. T. t ++ 1^AT"Ny li 77/9/30 AV�•O1tE.Yt r t i e zc:A: i x3ii Mark Rogers �3:.REirwPMS AA7J I _t p d �EfThRFD i, ^zT, 1 .no (415) 556-6514 2,5}�Sl la M + Q 11 a. :"u:y-; •1111...:,,". ..z,.Y.n.1:,'.c....r ero-c:e.,.;.,,,".'s...ca .1►.(E^.:•X: A=EA, I A.;$C'MIAL f 1 s sr*G i>t:.1'Y.v.,u:. •-1'Y EST.>..a a;tai T.Jwl�i .t A—SS1 (\i.w d til.jJJwI—) 00461 ' EEDEFAL XCtxwY �.:.i.:«s✓u 3.•,w+:s, Micrafiil�led V✓]t�'I A-93 ACTION board order s:A:i,'lin7 117.9" -_. lAZIt-CI-771 .-. 1111 1111 3 a f •1 T44.'ii E tli O O `f_ Y �'I A f L.�'. • i— 3 J.J._. S r'?f i.� I ."f t'�.+ .i > ...J1jf�' '• i��� ;_._.•!= _ 1/ tS- � tr. F w�Oi SEII. fJ � O n z to Ln ca } rli� Mi- f...� i.•ir"1 ±:. _ t { ; i F}� C rnrr !. O Z i=`o•` ; {. ! 7,; of ' a u or.Y' tyoi •i•i, 7 ' ( it t=!: k ' ! ;i �� oLn r .scar ett 3 :`�t�-a-"..'- ..! `. —i y(•'1 �' �-�•ys� S- v! oi. rn r i L i i (.i ,A y :i••S a•� T L W j+-f y t••. "f i�..• C ' NQ- N 0'0u'tLJ� `J^. 3 •i m i f P .0w�Y�.. V r .i coo. { Moe.. e= {O1V WWNO C C? tDO ;12 a: Cn i VO•A ^� z f —t �i�`�� '`'Q+.R� i =c•'" -�,,;,�•Z o i� y • (��th ..r � ••(O O G+�. "r: '? u. > of( � f~ " �. •�r!N �'4;"�`*{S? (��-�!���.: n �i I Moe.TYw a t O CDP OU I-V cr rtw+ a vI w� 07O ~ �` v V O i��`r✓ '� i_i y } 7 N 1 1 1 co 4M w" ".^"`•aQ.--... �t ..i .r. » }�'.s cor Stwp L;ri4: 1�?i+i�-i_R ri ; ►lulu {_:' C to �+ 1. C:> V^ r 0 - ^� G+ •a _ i N. i+ e. �- m �1 NIto F-'VS O - 1 Z tl � i ci v -•r 41 N ,i ... i 1 CD a ;rx trio p ! v t i t~ia t u lO � r O a CGS"7 1.! "''h►':` •� :O - r. ,F3, i,s rn r 4i a V1i VS ! ! 1 i - 1 •^^Ga.`•.i»r.,,.:.-_"„--•moi _. . - . -,��-•^.•�'-�-•��' :„n.-�.r.:-= _.., - tit"" ,�+o-Z`,.�",r- y���y - _ t ± y j i � 1 i i j` i c I.`.'ws.'3 ��• � • i-. 1 1a' �f i c ;� Ln i r ut ti 1 LT !t r w t l r.r,.:;t..:�t.:.a p • r O ' Ul i � � i � � � 3 ' ► �Y � � t E _ w, In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 7L In the Matter of Request for Legal Defense. The Board having received requests for legal defense from Harry D. Ramsey, Sheriff—Coroner, H. Donald Fund, Auditor Controller and Edgard 1 . Leal, Treasurer—Tax Collector, each advising that he had been served with a Complaint for Declaratory Relief No. 107626; and iss. Rosemary 14atossian, Deputy County Counsel, having advised in a September 27, 1976 memorandum that the Court has not acquired jurisdiction over these officers because they were not served with summonses or with an alternative writ of mandate, and having recommended that the Board take no action on the aforesaid request for legal defense until such time as the Court acquires jurisdiction over the named individuals; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of County Counsel is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Countv Sheriff—Coroner Supervisors County Auditor—Controller affixed this 28t1day of September, 19 76 County Treasurer—Tax Collector County Counsel _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator ' ) rr By�\.-. ,— " t_ ..-.c- l! . Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl 00463 H.24 4/76 1Sm OWN IN Td-= BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the "utter of Approving ) Reco.-Lnendations o_' Board ) rd-inistration and r^inance ) September 28, 1976 Corinittee. ) The Board heretofore havinc rade certain referrals to its 1976 Administration and Finance Co,=iittee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty); and Said Co=mittee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to said referrals: Item Date Recommendation U. S. Department of Health, 6-22-76 This item was referred to Education and Welfare the Administration and denial of grant application Finance Committee largely to design a comprehensive to'determine the fiscal human services delivery implications for the system during the 1976- 1976-1977 budget. The 1977 fiscal year. Committee ascertained that the grant application was not approved because too many proposals were submitted for the available funds. No action is necessary and, accordingly, it is recommended that the matter be removed as a Committee referral. Letter from Assemblyman 7-13-76 This letter was submitted at Daniel E. Boatwright the time the Blue Devils were urging that $17,000 in soliciting funds for purchase Federal Revenue Sharing of new uniforms; and although funds be allocated by the County was not able to the Board to purchase new assist, new uniforms were uniforms for the Blue obtained and the Blue Devils Devil Drum and Bugle Corps. went on to win the 1976 National Championship. No action is necessary and, accordingly, it is recommended that the item be removed as a Committee referral. The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recon_-mend=_tions to be appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afore- said reco:=endations- of its Administration and Finance Corm-, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. cc: Concord Blue Devils Assemblyman D. E. Boatwright Director, Human Resources Agency COPY County Auditor-Controller I eanffy that tha is a trait true A carrect copy of County Administrator the original document.hfcb Is on Ale In my office, and that It was passed k adopted by the Board of Superrlsors of Contra Coats County. Callforaf& on the date aboRn. ATTEST: J. R OL?SO'_V. Coonty Clerk k esofacfo Clerk of said Board of SuperTbsors by Deputy Clerk. SEP 2$ 1976 00►464 r County Administrator Contra Boar Supervisors Jams PP..KamMr �sta to District CountQ Administration Building atrr.d nit.Dias Mlartinez,California 94553 ^' t 2nd District (415)372-4080 County James E.Moriarty 3rd District Arthur G.Will warren N.Boggess County Administrator 4th District Edmund A.Unschsid 5th District RECEIVED September 27, 1976 s E P ) s 1976 J, It. oLSsav CLERK BOARD O: SUPERVISORS REPORT c IRA Costa OF f ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE Item Date Recommendation U. S. Department of Health, 6-22-76 This item was referred to Education and Welfare the Administration and denial of grant application Finance Committee largely to design a comprehensive to determine the fiscal human services delivery implications for the system during the 1976- 1976-1977 budget. The 1977 fiscal year. Committee ascertained that the grant application was not approved because too many proposals were submitted for the available funds. No action is necessary and, accordingly, it is recommended . that the matter be removed as . a Committee referral. Letter from Assemblyman 7-13-76 This letter was submitted at Daniel E. Boatwright the time the Blue Devils were urging that $17,000 in soliciting funds for purchase Federal Revenue Sharing of new uniforms; and although funds be allocated by the County was not able to the Board to purchase new assist, new uniforms were uniforms for the Blue obtained and the Blue Devils Devil Drum and Bugle Corps. went on to win the 1976 National Championship. No action is necessary and, accordingly, it is recommended that the item be removed as a Committee referral. /!/' / ' �/ ��'"t� cam/ ;•� ` W. N. BOGGESS ` J•: E. MORIARTY Supervisor, District IV Supervisor, District III Microfilmed with board order 004fi5 - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of Transportation in East County. The Board on September 21, 1976 having received bids for workshop transportation services; and The County Administrator having this day recommended that contract for said services be awarded to Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., after review and consideration of the matter by the Human Resources and Public Works Directors that this specialized service (provision of transportation services of mentally retarded adults to sheltered workshop facilities) is not a duplication of other transportation services; and The Public Works Director having reported to the County Administrator in a memorandum dated September 27, 1976 that a number of County departments and services are involved in transportation of people and that said department is willing to accept the leader- ship role in review of the several transportation services to seek consolidation and economies; and The Board having considered the matter, IT IS SO ORDERED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: County Administrator Wftess my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Public Works Director affixed this 28thday of_ September , 1976 Director, Human. Resources Agency J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk YPY r :T-163) H-24 3/76 t5m Coun Administrator eoardDKenny Supervisors , . ty Contra Jamas P.Kenny Costa ,�District I County Administration Building Alfred M.Din Martinez.California 94553 County 2nd Diw;ct (415)372-40N James E Moriarty 3rd District Warren N.Boggess Arthur G.YVill 4d,District County Administrator Edmund A.Urucfuid stn District RECEIVED SEP 2' 8 1976 O CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTr CO. To: Board of Supervisors Date: September 24, 1976 From: &Arthur G. W' 1, Subject: Contract for Workshop y dmi 'strator Transportation Services H d On September 21, 1976, the Board calendar contained an 11 a.m. item relating to receiving bids for provision of transportation to sheltered workshop facilities. At the time this item was considered, your Board inquired about this transportation service, including any duplication with other transit services which have been inaugurated in the County. The Public Works Department was requested to review this aspect of the matter and the Human Resources Agency to furnish its recommendation on the bids received in one week. Approval for execution of a contract with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., as a result of review of the bids received for this service, is listed on our agenda as Item 15; and an explanatory memorandum submitted by the Human Resources Director on this matter is attached. In the memorandum you will note that this service entails transporting mentally retarded adults from their homes to sheltered workshops and that there does not appear to be any duplication of transportation services in this case. CAH:lk Attachment cc ) . cc: C. L. Van *darter O!!��V4V / V. L. Cline Microfilmad with board order A - Hunan 'resources Agency Date September 22, 1976 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Conga Cosia COUI� Tj Arthur G. Will, County administrator � 7i_r� r-'� n-om C. L. Van `tarter, Director L - C,:#ce of SUbj AICA-DING CONTRACT FOR WORKSHOP TnA1SPORTATIO\ SERVICES Ccunry Ac!R?)iliSiCC Attached for presentation to the Board is a proposed Board Order awarding the workshop transportation contract to Martinez Bus Lines and authorizing me to execute the contract on behalf of the County. On Sept. 21, 1976, the Board received 2 competitive bids (copies attached) for the provision of workshop transportation services under Social Service Department aid r'20-100, as follows: UNIT ENROLLEE MAX. COMACT BIDDER PRICE CAPACITY AMOLMT 1. Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. $5.16 30 $103,320 2. Wofford Bus Co. (dba Patchett's $5.11 90 [blank] Bus & Traasp. Co.) The Board referred these bids to me for review and recommendation back to the Board on September 28, 1976. This service entails the transporting of mentally retarded adults from their homes to the sheltered workshops operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded in Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, and Richmond. This service has been provided under contract with the County for the past five years and the current contract with Wofford Bus Co., at a unit rate of $4.40 per enrollee per day, is set to expire on September 30, 1976. This is a very specialized service and I do not believe there to be any duplication of transportation services in this case. I have reviewed the bids and made the followi,pg determination: 1. The Martinez Bus Lines bid is the only responsive bid. 2. The Wofford Bus Co. bid is both incomplete and non—responsive to the Bid Specifications and is therefore rejected from consideration. The Bid Specifications required all bidders to state a Maximum Contract Amount, in addition to a daily Unit Price and a Service Capacity (i.e., number of enrollees to be transported daily). Wofford Bus Co. failed to state a Maximum Contract Amount, making their bid incomplete. fyUU0il1rrl A90M d order f Arthur G. Will September 22, 1976 Page 2 However, a maximum contract amount can be computed given the unit price ($5.11), the number of enrollees (90), and the period of time 4 (1 year, 5 days per week, less 10 holidays). Based on these figures, the t-offord Bus Co. offer would require a Maximum Contract Amount of + $114,975, exceeding the budgetary limit of $103,320 required by the Bid Specifications and making their bid non-responsive. As a separate consideration, the Social Service Department has evaluated the ho£ford Bus Co. performance under the present six-month contract which expires , at the end of this month. The Department finds the past performance to be A poor, including clients being kept on buses for longer than the 1 hour and l5 minute maximum and buses not following the scheduled arrival and departure times. Furthermore, Wofford Bus Co_ has failed to respond to Department attempts to work with the company to improve the performance. f I therefore recommend that the Board award the workshop transportation contract to Nartinez Bus Lines for the 12-month period, October 1, 1976 through September 30, 1977, at the $5.16 unit rate and Contract Payment Limit of $103,320. As in the past, contract costs are met from the Social Service Department's federal Title XX social services allocation (75%) and local matching funds donated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded (25%)_ To expedite completion of the contract, I also 3 recommend that the Board authorize me to execute the contract as soon as , it is prepared and approved as to legal form by the Office of the County Counsel, so as to preclude any interruption in service. , j I therefore request that you present my recommendations to the Board with your endorsement £or approval at their next meeting on Tuesday, September 28, 1976. CLQX/RJP:dg Attachments Copies: R_ E. Jornlin Bob Hofmann Dan Cruze • Lee Hunter June M. Larson 00469 • � � 'RECEPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT �D IVF 7 ad e -�, TRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: September 27, 1976 J. a. assoN TO• 0� Pt Ti . ounty Administrator a - Contra C, .� FROM: Vernon L. Cline, Public Works DirectoR. r �� SUBJECT: Transportation in East County Office of Count; Administrator In your memo of August 26, 1976, in response to Supervisor Moriarty's request, you asked that we prepare a report on the availability of public transportation in East County, with particular attention to the new programs approved by the Board and how these programs will provide transportation connections to the Pittsburg and Martinez medical facilities. Following is a summary of the transportation activities now being pursued in East County: Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority was recently organized and the directors had their first meeting on Septem er 3, 1976. The Transit Authority is a joint exercise of powers organization created to institute bus service in the (Jest Pittsburg, Pittsburg, Antioch, Oakley, and Brentwood areas. The Authority is pursuing the same type of demonstration transit program now operating in the Cities of Concord, Pleasant Hill and, most recently, Moraga. T'he bus system will be designed to improve the efficiency of the BART express buses and will provide, either directly or by transfer, service to the Pittsburg and Martinez medical facilities. If the Authority's plans continue to receive favorable response, the first buses may be in operation in April, 1977. Contra Costa County submitted a request for an S.K. 283 grant for a demonstra- tion program that proposed to provide a "demand responsive dial-a-ride" type of service in a rural portion of the county east of Antioch. Service provided by the demonstration program could be utilized by senior citizens, nutrition program participants, and other persons needing special transportation within the demand responsive service area. The Public Works Department has been notified verbally that the program has successfully passed the preliminary screening and that a more formal proposal must be submitted prior to October 12. The Department is noir preparing that proposal and intends to have it on the Board or Supervisors' agenda for October S. The proposal will indicate that the East Contra Costa County Transit Authority is beginning to organize and that, when the timing is appropriate, the County will turn the demonstration program over to the Authority. 0il1U Microfilmed with board order Arthur G. Will -2- September 27, 1976 Because the Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority is the most active transporta- tion program in the eastern part of the county, it has received requests for assistance to continue the operation of certain Social Service programs. In response to those requests, the Public Works Department arranged a meeting with representatives from the County Administrator's office and the City of Pittsburg (Model Cities, Senior Citizens), County Health Department (Nutrition Program), and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The meeting brought out the very urgent necessity of having a focal point for all programs dealing with the transportation of people. In the meantime, C. L. Van Marter, director of the Human Resources Agency, has been corresponding with Supervisor Linscheid concerning a request from Delma M. Webb, wherein duplication of transportation services was the issue. We just received a copy of a memo from Mr. Van Marter to Supervisor Linscheid. Mr. Van Marter states that because you asked the Public Works Department to undertake a study, he will not conduct a study but will cooperate with this Department. It should be pointed out that you merely asked this Department for a report, but not to get involved in a study. On September 21 the Board of Supervisors received bids for provision of transporta- tion services to shelter workshop facilities. These bids were referred to the Human Resources Agency for further recommendation and to the Public Works Department for comment. Because no other transportation service is now available, it is the feeling of the Public Works Department that the bids should be awarded so that this humanitarian program can continue for at least this year. If, in the future, a demand responsive type of service is available in any part of the county, it could be utilised for the service proposed with this contract. It is apparent that there are a number of County departments and services involved in the transportation of people: - the Public Works Department,with the several local public systems - Human Resources Agency and its various Social Service programs for the handicapped, aged, etc. - Health Department and its Nutrition Program _ - County Hospital and the various medical assistance programs It is further apparent that these several services could probably be consolidated and economies effected. It is recommended that a meeting be called to be attended by the heads of the departments involved and your office, to determine the best course.in which to proceed. The Public Works Department stands ready and willing to accept the leadership role. PEK:dmd Enc 0;14 r1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California - L -LL-a L-U. IL i:, ."LU,, .ended that a meeting be called to be attended by the heads of the departments involved and your office, to determine the best course.in which to proceed. The Public storks Department stands ready and willing to accept the leadership role. PEK:dmd Enc 0:14 r1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Award and Execution of Contract #20-006-2 For Workshop Transportation Services The Board on September 21, 1976, having.referred to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review and recommendation, competitive bids received for the transportation of mentally retarded adults, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, to the sheltered workshop facilities operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded; and On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board finds that bid 120-100-1 submitted by Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. is the only responsive bid at the unit price of $5.16 per person per day for an average of 80 persons to be transported per day, which bid is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the contract for the provision of said workshop transportation services is AWARDED to Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., at said unit price; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to execute contract $20-006-2, on behalf of the County, with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., for the provision of said workshop transportation services from October 1, 1976, through September 30, 1977, for mentally retarded adults in accordance with the Bid Specifications for Bid No. 20-100 and Title LX of the U. S. Social Security Act, with a Contract Payment Limit of $103,320, upon approval of said contract by the Office of the County Counsel and execution by the contractor. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. Award and Execution of Contract #20-006-2 For Workshop Transportation Services The Board on September 21, 1976, having.referred to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review and recommendation, competitive bids received for the transportation of mentally retarded adults, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, to the sheltered workshop facilities operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded; and On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board finds that bid t20-100-1 submitted by Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. is the only responsive bid at the unit price of $5.16 per person per day for an average of 80 persons to be transported per day, which bid is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the contract for the provision of said workshop transportation services is AWARDED to Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., at said unit price; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to execute contract 520-006-2, on behalf of the County, with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., for the provision of said workshop transportation services from October 1, 1976, through September 30, 1977, for mentally retarded adults in accordance with the Bid Specifications for Bid No. 20-100 and Title )LK of the U. S. Social Security Act, with a Contract Payment Limit of $103,320, upon approval of said contract by the Office of the County Counsel and execution by the contractor. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: Human Resources Agency Supervisor Attn: Contracts 5 Grants Unit cc: County Administrator affixed this 28thday of September 19 76 County Auditor-Controller Countv Welfare Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor �l By Deputy Clerk Ma�Gaig RJP:dg 00472 H-24 3/76 ISm A 'Contra Costa Counts • • Standard Form 5a.:.MiLRD C0'T2ACT (Purchase of Services) 3. Contract Identification. 11umber 2 0 - 0 0 6 - 2 Depart-ant: Social Service Subject: Workshop transportation services for mentally retarded adults (Services For Disabled Individuals) ?. Part:cs. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for Its Department named abov:, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: :_1,RTIYEZ BUS LINES, INC. C::?acity: Private-for-profit California corporation A-idress: P.O. Box 607, Martinez, California 94553 (3300 Pacheco Boulevard, Martinez) 3. Ter=. The effective date of this Contract is October 1, 1976, and it rerminates Sentember 30, 1977, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Pay-ent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ 103.32n 5. Count:'s Obligations. County shall rake to the Contractor those payments described in tie ?a}^=nt Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to alI the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by . reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. S. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Title 3M - Proposed Service Program Plan for Fiscal Year 1976-77, and any revisions or modifications thereof; Workshop Transportation Fid No. 20-100. 9. Legal Authoritc. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Title )M of the V. S. Social Security Act, as amended (P.L. 96-647); California Government Code Sections 26227 and 53703 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: COL1'Tf 0. COV'TR.a COSZA, CALI:ORVIA CONTRACTOR �c��Z�/•.V'�� By s y ms Director, Hu-an Resources Agency i (Designate official capacity in busiress- Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk and affix corporation seal) ;W49- State of California ) —2� By County of Contra Costa ) ss. Deputy ACi4Y014'LBDGEMOT (CC 1190.1) _ The person signing above for Contractor Rico—ended by Department known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowledged that he/ By they signed it and that the corporation Designee or partnership named above executed the s within instrument pursuant to its bylaws L•1� or a resolution of its board of directors. Form Approved: County Counsel /� Dated: �f oZ9� Q7�i F.y l�G-f/+d� Deputy _ De ut -Coun-Ey Clerk. 00 ROBERT J. PROC[Ot .:::; - DEPUTY COUNTY..: : ~: (A-4617 Ra''l 6/76) Microfilmed with order Contra Costa:Cou s ; board I 1 I f° Contra Cosa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Fee Basis Contracts) Number20 - 006 " 2 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. $ monthly, or [XI b. $ 5.16 per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein and as full compensation for all services, work, and expenses provided or incurred by Contractor hereunder. r 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly or as specified in 1. (Payment Amounts) above, for payment in accordance with Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered- Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. x 3. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 4. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State, or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. 00474 3 (A 4619 REV 6/76) i 0 e 1 SERVICE PLAN + 20 - 006 Number a 1. Service. Contractor shall provide services under this Contract in accordance = with Workshop Transportation Bid No. 20-100-1 and the Bid Specifications for said Bid. Pursuant thereto, Contractor shall provide daily, round trip transportation services as authorized by County for eligible mentally retarded persons, age 18 or over, who are enrolled in the Activity Workshop Program operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the Mentally Retarded, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Association"). In providing these services Contractor shall pick up on weekday mornings certain enrollees (designated by County) at their places of residence and transport said enrollees (doorto door) to the workshop facilities operated by the Association, as follows: a. 144 South 13th Street, Richmond; b. 490 Golf Club Road, Pleasant 11111; and c. 610 Nest 10th Street, Pittsburg. On those same afternoons Contractor shall pick up these enrollees at said workshop facilities (or at such other locations as may be designated by the Association) and transport them back to their respective residences. No enrollee shall be required to i ride more than I hour and 15 minutes at a time. Contractor shall provide said daily, door to door, round trip transportation services regularly, 5 days per week (Monday through Friday), for up to approximately 80 full-time-equivalent enrollees each month between their residences and the above workshop facilities, to arrive at the workshops at approximately 8:50 A.M. and to depart from the workshops (or other designated locations) at approximately 3:00 P.M., excluding regularly scheduled Association holidays and vacations. Contractor shall also provide occasional special transportation for regular enrollees having a temporary change of residence, to transport such enrollees on a short-tern basis (not to exceed approximately 21 days at a time) between their new, temporary residence and their regular workshop, as prescribed above. i 2. Service Administration. Without any limitation upon its obligations under any tem of the General Conditions expressed herein, Contractor shall: a. Utilize properly licensed Class II school buses having three or four rows of seats and a capacity for eight to sixteen adult enrollees. Such vehicles must meet all safety requirements and have all equipment required by the laws and regulations of the State of California, including the California Vehicle Code for School Buses, and the State Department of Motor Vehicles. Contractor shall not transport more than the maximum number of passengers in each bus at any one time than is stipulated by the California Vehicle Code and indicated for vehicle capacity under the manufacturer's specifications. t b. Have spare, standby buses adequate to maintain continuous service. All such buses for use under this Contract shall meet the requirements set forth herein for regular buses. c. Maintain all vehicles in good, safe operating condition at all times. Coutractor shall present said vehicles for periodic safety inspections in such time, place, and manner as may be required by the County. Such safety inspections shall include, but are not limited to, the removal of wheels for the inspection of brake drums. i d. Use no recap tires on the front wheels of said vehicles. e. Have safety belts installed and maintained for use at all times in said. vehicles by the driver and each passenger and ensure the continuous use of said seat belts by all passengers. f. Provide vehicles which have special equipment, as needed, including hydraulic lifts for transportation of enrollees in wheelchairs, and which are able to accommodate the special needs of handicapped and non-ambulatory enrollees, including trays, braces, pads, crutches, walkers, and wheelchairs. g. Train drivers in the routes to be followed, in the laws and regulations governing transportation of handicapped and disabled persons, in standard safety practices, and in supervision of mentally retarded persons. Initials: Aontractor County Dept. -�- 004 sL r SERVICE PLAN Number — 006 - 2 006 - 2 201 3 i h. Employ qualified and properly licensed drivers who, in addition: (1) Are 21 years of age or older; t (2) Accept disabled, handicapped, and mentally retarded persons in a t positive manner; (3) Understand currently accepted first—aid procedures and have additional, specialized knowledge concerning the safety of persons subject to epileptic seizures; ('.•) Are willing to establish and maintain constructive relationships c with'parents, passengers, and Association personnel; a (5) Possess a valid California operator's license for Class 11 vehicles; (6) Have an annually current chest X—ray report on file with Contractor, showing that each does not have tuberculosis, and i 9 (7) Are acceptable at all times to County and Association. i. Establish and maintain an adequate communication system to ensure that daily messages can be transmitted between drivers, parents, and enrollees. 3 i j. Assign a single contact person to represent Contractor and act as liaison with County's administrative and program staff. k. Maintain strict adherence to scheduled arrival and departure times. S 1. Ensure that enrollees are protected against physical or mental abuse from other passengers. m. Provide assistance to enrollees who need help in boarding or getting off the buses, including drivers giving assistance by arta or providing step stools or other j needed accessories. 3. General Operations. As part of its performance hereunder, Contractor also will: a. Secure and maintain appropriate facilities, vehicles, and equipment and employ qualified drivers and staff sufficient to provide the full range of services specified under this Contract. b. Provide necessary information as required by County for County's recertification of each enrollee's eligibility for receipt of services. c. Provide County with periodic information and reports a.t such times and manner as the County prescribes, regarding enrollees, including, but not limited to, j a lob; of daily service use by enrollees. d. Keep records on each enrollee which will include eligibility and certifi— cation information, health and safety information, services provided, and daily service use with dates for enrollees beginning and terminating service. e. Advise the County promptly if any en_ollee served under this Contract discontinues use of Contractor's service. f. Notify the County immediately, should Contractor exercise the right to terminate any enrollee from services. g. Advise enrollees under this Contract who are dissatisfied with any action taken by Contractor of their right to present grievances with respect to the provision of services hereunder; Contractor shall establish a fair hearing system whereby enrollees may present such grievances. Initials: -oAe tractor County Dept. —2- 0 014 r; s .% u SERVICE PLAN :cumber2 " - 006 r 2 r h. Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and municipal laws, regulations, and ordinances governing health and safety. i. Accept referrals of appropriate persons enrolled in the Association workshop program from County and Association for such transportation services as may be authorized by County. County and Contractor understand that the Association will periodically provide Contractor with a current time schedule and list of names and addresses of workshop enrollees authorized for service under this Contract to allow for the timely transportation of said enrollees between their residences and the Association's workshop facilities. County and Contractor further understand that the Association shall verify workshop attendance for enrollees in connection with their use of said transporta- tion services on a daily basis. j. Cooperate in establishing and file with the Association a copy of all transportation routes and time schedules to conform to workshop schedules and safety conditions as necessary to effect the timely transport of eligible enrollees between their residences and the workshop facilities. Such routes and schedules shall be subject to evaluation and approval by the Association prior to implementation. The actual enrollees, number of enrollees, and residence locations are subject to continuous change and Contractor shall regularly revise transportation routes and schedules accordingly. County and Contractor understand that the association shall provide Contractor with appropriate information concerning the health and physical condition and the personal and social adjustment of enrollees, as needed in support of said transportation services. k. Make available to County upon request a copy of all transportation routes and time schedules which shall be subject to approval by County and shall conform with safety standards and program schedules, as needed to effect the timely transport of enrollees between their residences and the Association's workshops. 1. Provide County with all pertinent information regarding Contractor's financial status, operating expenditures, service costs, and fees as needed by County to determine reasonableness of cost for the services being provided under this Contract. 4. Enrollee Eligibility. Services under this Contract shall only be provided j to persons who meet all of the following eligibility requirements; each enrollee must be: a. Referred and certified as being eligible for receipt of services, by written authorization from County, prior to service delivery and for a specified period, showing the beginning and ending dates of service eligibility, not to exceed six months at a time. b. Age 18 or over (as required by Association enrollment standards). c. Accepted by the Association as an activity workshop enrollee. County shall pay Contractor for authorized services to eligible enrollees as herein provided for that period of service eligibility which is authorized by County for each such enrollee or until such time as County notifies Contractor of a cessation of eligibility, if an enrollee's eligibility is terminated before the end of the authorized service period. 5. Service unit. One unit of service, for payment purposes, shall be defined as one enrollee's actual daily use of Contractor's at-rhorized transportation services; i.e., the provision of workshop transportation services as described herein for one eligible enrollee on one weekday, and such unit is payable at $ 5.16 per enrollee per day. In addition to actual rides, each enrollee's actual daily use may include up to one failure- to-ride per calendar month when the bus makes a regularly scheduled stop at the enrollee's residence to pick up the enrollee, but only when the Contractor has not received prior notification that the enrollee will not be using the transportation service, as scheduled. No more than one such failure-to-ride per month may be claimed for each enrollee on Contractor's payment demand for the calendar month applied. Payment demands must identify and separate claims for actual rides from allowable claims for failures-to- ride. Contractor shall notify the Association of any such failure-to-ride on the same day as the occurrence. The above payment rate shall apply during the term of this Contract to transportation routes acceptable to the Association for as long as the routes are in existence. This same rate shall apply to all special transportation and to all new routes as they are established. f' Initials: Contractor County De t" -3- . rr x SPECLU. CONDITIONS Number 20 - 006 - 2 b F 7 Z 1. Compliance with Federal and State Requirements. Without any limitation upon J its obligations under Paragraph 1. (Compliance with Law), page 1, of the General Conditions, Contractor shall comply with all Federal and State regulations, circulars, orders, guide- lines, and directives pertaining hereto, including Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter II, Part 228, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, as amended, and the California State Comprehensive Annual Services Program Plan, Title XX, July 1, 1976 - June 30, 1977, with respect to "Services for Disabled Individuals." 2. Source of Funds_ This Contract is funded under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security act by a combination of local matching funds (25 t) and federal social services funds (75%) allocated to the County by the State of California. The County provides the local matching share for contract costs and receives reimbursement for the federal share from the State as follows: i Local matching funds (25'".) $ 25,830 Federal funds (75a) 77,490 i Total (Contract Payment Limit) $ 103,320 j County guarantees that the local matching share of funding for this Contract does not consist of Federal funds; County may obtain the local matching share through donations from the local community. 3. Preference in Training and Employment. Contractor shall give preference in employment and training to public assistance recipients, when appropriate and required by applicable State or Federal laws or regulations. 4. Nondiscrimination and Affirmative action. Contractor shall comply with the i Civil Rights Act of 1964 and with all applicable requirements of Executive Order No. 11246, entitled "Equal Employment Opportunity," as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, and as supplemented in Department of Labor Regulations (41 CFR Part 60). Contractor hereby I certifies that it has an affirmative Action Plan, if required by State or Federal law, t which declares that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, national origin, set, and age and which specifies goals and target dates to assure the implementation of that plan. In the performance of this Contract, Contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment. Contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their age, sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Contractor shall post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the State setting forth the requirements for Fair Employment Practices. 5. Termination, Further Provision. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. (Written Notice), page 1, of the General Conditions, Contractor may terminate this Contract upon giving fifteen-day advance written notice thereof to County but only if a labor strike or the unavailability of fuel totally impairs the operation of Contractor's business. 6. additional Insurance Coverage. Paragraph 19.a. (Liability Insurance), page 3, of the General Conditions is hereby modified by increasing the minimum combined single Iir_it coverage required for comprehensive liabili_v insurance specified therein from $500,000 to $5,000,000. all other parts of said paragraph remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Initials: ntractor County Dept. 004 75 Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 1. Complaince with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, or cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed• upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to,monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements shall be designated as such and shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required hereunder. Such Informal Agreements may not enlarge in any manner the scope of this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved and signed by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. b. Administrative amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. (A-4616 REV 6/76) a .. Contra Costa County • Standard rorm GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract shall be amended to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal approval. 14. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. If Contractor is a corporation, Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of its most recently adopted bylaws and also a complete and accurate list of its governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur. 16. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require its employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confi- dentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service.. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic ba:kground, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. (A-4616: REV .6/76) -2- Contra Costa County • Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) 18. Idemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, resulting from the conduct, negligent or otherwise,•of the Contractor, its agents or employees, the County, its agents or employees, or any other person or entity. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of comprehensive liability insurance, including coverage for owned and non-owned auto- mobiles, naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person and damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each accident or occurrence. b. Workers' Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of insurance evidencing workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. The policies shall include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal Governments, their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by them shall not be required to contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policy or policies. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts & Grants Unit, Human Resources Agency, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor. 00464 (A-4616 REV 6/76) -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Award and Execution of Contract ;10-006-2 For Workshop Transportation Services The Board on September 21, 1976, having.referred to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for review and recommendation, competitive bids received for the transportation of mentally retarded adults, under Title XX of the U. S. Social Security Act, to the sheltered workshop facilities operated by the Contra Costa County Association for the !dentally Retarded; and On the recommendation 'of the Director, Human Resources Agency, the Board finds that bid 020-100-1 submitted by Martinez Bus Lines, Inc. is the only responsive bid at the unit price of $5.16 per person per day for an average of 80 persons to be transported per day, which bid is on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the contract for the provision of said work-shop transportation services is AWARDED to Martinez Bus Lines, Inc., at said unit price; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED, to execute contract 020-006-2, on behalf of the County, with Martinez Bus Lines, Inc:, for the provision of said workshop transportation services from October 1, 1976, through September 30, 1977, for mentally retarded adults in accordance with the Bid Specifications for Bid No. 20-100 and Title MC of the U. S. Social Security Act, with a Contract Payment Limit of $103,320, upon approval of said contract by the Office of the County Counsel and execution by the contractor. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify thct the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orifi: Human Resources Agency Attn: Contracts 5 Grants Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this28thday of September 19 76 County Auditor-Controller County Welfare Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Contractor 1 8y ;���,>'ct/ rl�.i . Deputy Clerk 1.101¢iCraig ELM-dg 004a H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California �entcribcr 28 1976 In the Matter of s - Ludget Adjustr..cnts for County Fire Protection Districts s zW,sS i s Y tY` w X j 4 IT is 3Y TIIG M)AM) MDEPLI) that the County Auditor"zs At117110RIZIip Tb decrease the following appropriations of 1976.-1977 budgets for County,fire protection districts to rennin within the maximum Icgal tax levy pursuant to Goverim nt Codi 290s. Fire Protection bistriet met item Amount Gr.entuood reserve for contingencies 4,066.00 ftyron Reserve for continrencies 1,860.00 Crockett-Carqulne_ Fixed assets 3,0411 Res. for contingencies 5,000 3,041.00 t L Sohrante Reserve For contingencies 30,395.00 f"tr+�le. Prof. ;rpersonal services 1,335.00 'd lastJ "a Fire:1 as=:cts 2,312.00 Mt4t�cr Fix+ai assets 13,480 Res:, foi eontinxencics ( 353) , 1,7,521.00 m z %y r.�� A✓� s3'.S y S n�""Nk Passed big the Board:on' September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of supervisors affixed this 28th day of September, 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk i Deputy Clerk Orifi: Audit6i,C ntrol2cr's )fs"ice 1Naune M_heu e Fire 7).ist?1•acts ,:; 'Coin, Zutaxrii,st ator ou483 M 24 8/75 30M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 11976 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Symposium IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Duane Dillon, Sheriff-Coroner's Department, is AUTHORIZED to attend, at Federal Government expense, the Fourth National Symposium on Crime Laboratory Development, to be held at the FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia, from October 11, 1976 to October 15, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Originating Dept• Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28th day of Sentember, 1971— County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk tl WUeld 00464 H 24 8175 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Travel Authorization IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that E. F. WANAKA, Contra Costa County Assessor is AUTHORIZED to travel to Atlanta, Georgia to participate in the International Association of Assessing Officers Conference on Assess- ment Administration to be held during the period of October 17, 1976 through October 20, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a hue and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Assessor County Auditor-Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this _8thday ofsentember . 19 7L P) J. R. OLSSON, Clerk e . Deputy Clerk Maxine&S.Neufeld 00485 H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of In the !Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meeting On the recommendation of the County Probation Officer, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Mrs. Chris Adams is authorized to attend at County expense the Constitutional Rights Foundation Seminar "Education for Law, Justice and Citizenship: A Call for Action", South Lake Tahoe, California, September 27-29, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Probation Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Probation Officer Supervisors Juvenile Justice/ affixed this 28tbday of September . 1976 Delinquency Prevention Commission — Probation J. R. QI.SSQN, Clerk County Administrator County Auditor-Controller B _..., Deputy Clerk ine M. Neufald 00486 H-24 3/7615m WCD N E }C j In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING Approving Contract Documents BOARD OF THE CONTRA COSTA Submitted by the Contra Costa COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT County Fire Protection District The County Administrator having presented to the Board contract documents (Notice to Contractors, Contract, Abatement Specifications and Proposal) submitted by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District for the abatement of weeds, rubbish and other fire hazard conditions within the district for the pebiod of December 1, 1976 through November 30, 1977; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid documents are APPROVED and November 2, 1976 at 11:00 a.m. is FIXED as the time to receive bid proposals for performance of said work; and- IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to publish the Notice to Contractors for the time and in the manner as required by law in the "Contra Costa Times." Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing h o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid Orig: Administrator Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of supervisors cc: Contra Costa County Fire affixed this 28tlHay of September , ig 76 Protection District _ Auditor-Controller County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By aai�� Deputy Clerk 1Pl Craig 004K H•2i 3/7615.,n i MIN In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Travel IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following individuals are AUTHORIZED to travel to San Diego, California; Chicago, Illinois; Kane County, Illinois; St. Louis, Missouri; and Boulder, Colorado, to inspect detention facilities at those locations for the dates of October 5, 1976 through October 8, 1976, at County expense: Thomas M. Finley and Robert M. Rygh, Public Works Department Leslie A. Glenn and Norris D. Holthus, Office of County Sheriff-Coroner James Davi, Detention Facility Advisory Committee Member Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Public Work's' Witness my hand and the Seal bf the Board of CC,. Administrator Supervisors Sheriff-Coroner ofBxed tW8th d of September 1976 Auditor-Controller °�' Mr. Wm. Wainwright, Chairman Contra Costa County Detention ^ J. R. OISSON, Clerk Facility Advisory Cte. 1154 Hillside Dr. By ^`� C Deputy Clerk OryMartinez, CA 94553 Ory g 0048 H-24 3/7615m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Exercising Option to Extend Lease with Duffel Financial and Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners, for Premises at 2401-D Stanwell Drive, Concord. The County of Contra Costa has in effect a lease with Duffel Financial and Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners, dated September 24, 1974 for premises at 2401-0 Stanwell Drive, Concord, California, presently occupied by the Human Resources Agency, Manpower Project; and Section 5, Page 1, thereof grants to the County the option to extend said lease upon the terms and conditions as set forth in said lease; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County hereby EXERCISES its option to extend the lease for a period of one year and 55 days, effective November 1, 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department, Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Division Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28tbd v of September _ 1976 Public Works — — Real Property Lessor via R/P J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Buildings & Grounds County Auditor-Controller a Deputy Clerk Human Resources Agency Maxtn U Neufe" 00469 H-24 3/76 11m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 1976 In the Matter of Amended Clain for Danares. Attorney Steven Kazan, 120 Fleventh Street, Oakland, California 94607 having filed an amended claim for damages on August 24, 197E in the amount of $500,000 on behalf of Mr. Douglas Stewart., IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid amended claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid ec• Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public 1•7orks Director Supervisor Attn: "r. Proatch affixed this 28 day of September 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 64 00490 H-24 3/7615M a r AMENDMENT TO CLAIM AGAINST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ?MEDICAL SERVICES AND COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO: DONALD J. LUDWIG,Administrator RE5EIVED . Contra Costa County Medical Services 2500 Alhambra Avenue AUG 2 4 1976 Martinez, California 94553 J.fie.O1.S50N Clerk, Board of Supervisors CLW rgA%n OF SUP£RVI50i5 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA QNIRA COSTA CO. Administration Building J Martinez, California 94553 Claimant DOUGLAS STEWART hereby amends his claim presented August 13, 1976 to include the following under HOLY DID ACCIDENT OCCUR: Claimant was treated at Contra Costa County Medical Services facility from May 3, 1976 until May 6, 1976 for injuries received in an accident of May 3, 1976. Because of the failure of hospital employees and agents and others,whose names are unknown at this time, to adhere to the standard of care required of their professions, claimant did not receive the medical care and treatment required by the standard of care and consequently suffered serious personal injury. Dated: August 20, 1976. I� EVEN KAZAN Attorney for C ima t 00491 CLAIM AGAINST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEDICAL SERVICES AND COUNTY OF CONTRA COSri'A,STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO: DONALD J. LUDWIG, Administrator Contra Costa County Medical Serveies 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez, California 94553 F D Clerk, Board of Supervisors AUG Ito 1976 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Administration Building J. a.o� Martinez, California 94553 a�jO^p0't 'OF;UrZW RS CLAIMANTS NAME: DOUGLAS STEWART CLAIMANT'S ADDRESS: c/o Steven Kazan 120 Eleventh Street, Oakland, California 94607 CLAIMANT TELEPHONE: 526-3378 AMOUNT OF CLAIM: $500,000.00 ADDRESS TO WHICH Steven Kazan NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT: A Law Corporation 120 Eleventh Street Oakland, California 94707 DATE OF OCCURRENCE: Continuing from May 3, 1976 to May 6, 1976 PLACE OF OCCURRENCE: Contra Costa County Medical Servcies 2500 Alhambra Avenue Martinez,California 94553 HOW DID ACCIDENT OCCUR: Claimant was treated at Contra Costa County Medical Services facility from May 3, 1976 until May 6, 1976 for injuries received in an accident of May 3, 1976. Claimant did not receive the medical care and treatment required by the standard of care and consequently suffered serious personal injury. ITEMIZATION OF CLAIM: Head injuries including loss of memory, injury to hearing and sense of smell, injuries to claimant's foot, medical and hospital expenses, loss of earnings and earning capacity, pain, suffering and severe emotional distress. Amount of said itemization: $500,000.00 Dated: August 13, 1976. :A EVEN KAZ Attorney for imant 00492 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Mr. and Mrs. Robert H. Dutton, 25 Northgate Road, Walnut Creek, California 94895 having filed a claim for damages on August 19, 1976; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervisors Attn: Mr. Broatch affixed this 28tiVoy of September , 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By a Deputy Clerk Robbie qAtierreo H-24 3176 11m ?49 00 �lllJJl� v -.� - 'w .� I7 /974, i i ��,,y,`) �,tc.i.r,�.,,t✓ t�e�-�-�-�. �"".�.z2f.< t/✓�}�L./c.C<y:^-�/ • ! f'1../.�f..Cl.:-►t CYl ,,,f"c7E� j Jr f J I&. /I /�� �� — f�� ..r..y�j,(,�t•ti"s'R..t.O•✓ � OZ.iT � - 1��- C-e-=,v :.�cca-+s. �/��E11• 69. a '1n2._J�u J=' �/%/``' GCiL'nLU�Gv •ca F E D AJG 9 1976 :��-• �=.ur-- � /�-�-=--�' . . . J.R OLSSQN COMM BONO-c r iiSUPER1ftSOik3 iRA CQ J - ...� _....i+`^fir �P"ti. .�"�`r't.y,�'#"P�w6►'-^+.�ur^w�K.q�w+Qys:.c.r.e.�^ YK Yr�• ifMS�. 00494 :moi:^ _ 11�.:T'� �,. - - . tx LLA ., cvu E— cn LLA y =Lgj Lgicn � to .. cm fn cn r v L^ c .l 00496 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Robbins 6 Dangott, Attorneys at Law, Latham Square Building, Room 1020, Oakland, California *94612 having filed a claim for damages on August 25, 1976 in the amount of $10,000 on behalf of Mr. Phillip Loville, 4608 Cypress, Richmond, California 94800; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Claimant Supervisor Public Forks Director affixed this 28tWay of September , 19 76 Attn: Mr. Broatch County Counsel County Administrator /1 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �X Deputy Clerk Robbie tier le 00497 H-24 1/76►Sm • F - A 2a J. R. aERK BOAT pl Q�jiSORS In the Matter of the Claim of CO. NOTICE OFC ` , P'^'rr r Tp r nVrr r F LAIM F R INJIT t I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of on order entered on the d. minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date afoWtness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Claimant Supervisors September 19 76 Public works Director affixed this 28thday of Attn: ?!r. Broatch County Counsel R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Deputy Clerk Byht Robbie utierre 00497 H-24 3/76 ISm _ I LE Fi L QERK COAs Qi SU?E?/IiO�$ ' A TA CA. Inthe Matter of the Claim of e NOTICE OF CLAIM F R INJU . PHILLIP LOVILLE TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ITS OFFICERS,AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that PHILLIP LOVILLE claims against the County of Contra Costa, its offices, agents and employees for personal injury, medical expenses and general damages sustained by said PHILLIP LOVILLE by reason of personal injuries received by him, and in support thereof, the claimant states: 1. Post office address of claimant is 4608 Cypress, Richmond, Ca_ 2_ The names of claimant's attorneys are ROBBINS & DANGOTT, Latham Square Bldg., Rm. 1020, Oakland, Ca. All notices of denial or acceptance of this claim should be mailed to said attorney 3_ The claim of PHILLIP LOVILLE is for the negligence of the County of Contra Costa, its officers, agents and employees, and others, as hereinafter set forth: (a) That on July 23, 1976, claimant was operating an auto- mobile on San Pablo Avenue and Garvin Avenue, in the City of Richmond, County of Contra Costa, State of California, when struck by an automobile driven by Ovid L_ Holmes, Jr_, an agent, and employee of the County of Contra Costa, which said automobile was owned by the County of Contra Costa, and which claimant is lead to believe is under the direct management, control, supervision, 1. �t I D maintenance and operation of the County of Contra Costa, its officers, agents and employees_ That said automobile was so poorly managed, controlled, supervised, operated and maintained that said automobile collided with claimant's automobile and thereby caused claimant to suffer severe injuries. (b) That the claimant suffered injury and damages to his body in general and other injuries the extent of which are un- known at this time. (c) The accident as aforesaid, and injuries and resulting damages alleged herein, were caused solely through the negligence and carelessness of the County of Contra Costa, its officers, agents and employees, who failed to tike proper precautions in maintaining, supervising, managing, controlling and operating the said automoile as set forth in 3 (a) above_ (d) The claimant PHILLIP LOVILLE solely by reason of the negligence and carelessness of the County of Contra Costa, its officers, agents and employees, was forced to spend money for medical treatment. That by reason of the foregoing, the claimant has been generally damaged in the sum of Ten Thousand and no/100 ($10,000.00) Dollars_ HEREFORE, claimant PHILLIP LOVILLE requests that the County of Contra Costa honor and pay the claim as hereinabove set forth in the sum of Ten Thousand and no/100 ($10.000.00) Dollars. Dated: August 24, 1976. ROBB,Y1Z%7S & DANGOTT, B Y � ;?, ttorneys for Claimant Latham Square Bldg. Oakland, ca_ 94612��'lq r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California f September 28 19 i In the Matter of Authorizing Advance of Funds in the Amount of $238,500 to the OEO Program IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to advance funds in the amount of $238,500 for the operation of the Office of Economic Opportunity Program (Central } Administration and Delegate Agencies) pending receipt of Federal grant for the fourth quarter of the 1976 program year. j PASSED AND ADOPTED ON September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Ori g. Dept.: OEO Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28th day of-September, 19 76 Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk B C /�i Deputy Clerk '^e M.Neural OU H 24 6/75 AOM - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Payment of Utilities (Gas and Electricity) for Concerted Services Project, Inc., Pittsburg, California On the recommendation of the County Administrator, it is BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Auditor-Controller is authorized to pay the cost of utility services (gas and electricity only) for the Concerted Services Project, Inc., in Pittsburg, through the first half of the fiscal year 1976-1977, not to exceed $3000, and with the understanding that invoices are to be submitted to the County Auditor-Controller for payment. Passed and Adapted on September 28, 19176. I hereby certify that the forgoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Se41 of the Board of Supervisors cc: Concerted Services Project, affixed this 28th d of September, 19 76 County welfare Director ay County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON. Clerk County Administrator gy Deputy Clerk Maxine M.Ne�u_fdfd 010499 A H 24 8/75 10M s 1 � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 7k- In the Matter of Appointment to the Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council. On the recommendation of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that 14s. Thelma Mosca, 245 Madison Avenue, Pittsburg, California 94565 is APPOINTED to the Contra Costa .County Community Development Advisory Council as a representative of Supervisorial District V. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Ids. T. Mosca Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator supervisors Public Information Officerffied this28thdoy of September , 19 76 Director of Planning ' J. R. OLSSON, Clerk BY _ ' ��,_ Deputy Clerk Randa Amdahl 00500 A H•24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 19 76 In the Matter of Authorizing Suit to Recover Costs Due Contra Costa County IT IS BY TIE BOARD ORDERED that legal action be inititated in the Small Claims Court by the Auditor-Controller'a Office against the following persons to recover the cost owed Contra Costa County: Braxton Coofler Auditor-Controller 5300.00 George Price DBA Price Electrical Co. Building Inspection $202.7h PASSED AND ADOPTED on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Adrdnistrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Auditor-Controller d 28th September 76 affixed this ay of r p . 19 _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk (P) Deputy Clerk H 24 1204 - 15-61 A4extn@tit.Neuf d of rJU� y In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Fee-for-Service Contract and/or Novation Agreements with Physicians, Dentists, Optometrists and Podiatrists Utilized by the County Medical Services and County Health Department IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Contract and/or Novation Agreements for those fee-for-service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the County Health Department whose names are listed below are hereby APPROVED, implementing Resolution No. 75/844. Name Number Effective Date Rate Roger A. Greenwald, M.D. 26-759 August 6, 1976 $19.20 hourly IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resources Agency, is AUTHORIZED to sign the Contracts and/or Novation Agreements on behalf of this Board. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. a Orig: Human Resources Agency Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Attn: Contracts Unit Supervisors cc: County Administrator affixed this 28th day of September, 1976 County Counsel J, R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-ControllerB- Deputy Clerk H 24 izrza • 15-61 Maxine fid. Feld County Medical Director Chief, Medical Administrative Services Cuunty Health Utficer Personnel Services Unit Employee Relations Officer 005119 LGJXS:sM: T FOR iTOMSSrtr,AL 5I:i'VIC%S Coutracr raid 1'hysici:nu (Contra Coata County I:urcau Resources Agency) .t tiumber `� 1 5 g 1. Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-nared Contractor nuivai y agree and promise as folluws: 2. Variables. a. Contractor (name) Greeajald, P.oger A. (address) 1923 P-"ic Meadow, Danville, CA 94526 _ L 837-3993 PPore b. (:K) AttendinS Physician ( ) Psychiatrist ( i Podiatrist O Fhysician!.Residezt O Dentist O Optometrist O Orthodontist ( ) c. Effective Date August 6, 1976 d. Method of Payment (Board Resolution No. 75/844 ). Check appropriate bort: Hourly Paid Contract-_ Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. Rate: $ '19-20 per hour [ ] P:onthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered in accordance with established monthly schedule. Rate: $ ' per =oath. j in addition to those cor=ally and additionallscheduled and required T as specified is 4. Services, County will pay Contractor $ per hour in addition to monthly rate. c. Anesthesia Services: Contractor agrees to perform anesthesia services to be compensated as set forth in Board Resolution No. 75/843. Agreement includes availability for anesthesia Services: [ ] Yes [x] No 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supp:V.ent those rendered by County employees. ---"-•AContracto: is specially trained, experienced and ceroetert to perform special professional ser ices_ and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Sectina 2.b, pursuant to Government Cede Section 31000 and Eealth and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services specified in 2.b. above, including all services normally-and custo=arily connected therewith, including on-call services, and such a>_dirional services as are required, at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or 'stealth C-Eficer. The aforenaxed shall nrnartdr+ r-ntr;e.rcr ..-_.. u picLessic•UC- serv2ees reasonavI7 in advance of their effective dates. in cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Tiedical Director or Health Officer may maaha such changes in the duty schedule as are required. The County shall not chane assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. For purposes of this Agreement, the ::edical Director and!ur health Officer are authorized to act on hchalf of the County. S. Term. The tern of this agreement shall be from its effective date, as indicated 3n Section 2.c. throu h Oc:eber 31. 1976. but it may be cancelled is:.:.ediately by r:utual consent, or by either party, by Civizg 30 days advance wricten notice thereof to the other. 6. Tlndif3catiu:: :inn F_<tells ion. This contract may br: niodifln:d and/or extended by mutual agreement of the County and the Contractor and approved by the Board. Microfilmed with board order . Lumber 7. P -iont. Each month the Contractor shall invoice the County in the form 'prescribed by the County, clearly speciiyin^ services rendered to the County. ! Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the Count% shall pay Contractor: a. if hour] paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2.d. for each hour approved; or b, if monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2.d. or pro-rata amount for said approved period, or for additional services, at the per hour rate. 8. Mileage Reinhurs.-:hent. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-3.1SO2, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for milease reimbursement will be submitted monthly or. "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. i 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations, procedures and bylaws for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status.,, Cort"actor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employrent Social Security Taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. 11. PrivileCes. Contractor will zeta-in the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate Drofessioral organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies, and nor.-profit =edical corporations. 12. Insurance. If obtainable at a reasonable cost, County shall keep in effect a policy or policies of liability insurance including professional malpractice liability as provided in the policy No. CL 299345 issued by Providence I:ashington Insu_nnce Group to the County and in effect on October 1, 1975 with limits of.$500,000 per person and $1,000,000 Der occurrence and =brella liability insurance policy - 4173—JL74 IisL"Cd Ly t:ie 11_.s:=,7ze Cu paiiy :>i L'lti: SL4ce of Fennsylva:tia with a limit of $5,000,000 each occurrence/annual aggregate to the County and in effect on October 1,.1975 cojerino bath the contractor and the County under this agreement. The County shall have sole and absolute discretion to determine whether the cost of obtaining such policy or policies of insurance is reasonable. If the County determines that liability insurance, including professional malpractice insurance, or malpractice insurance only, is not obtainable at a reasonable cost, the Countv will become self-insured (Govt. C.4990.4) and will corer contractor's liability to the sa=e extent as covered in policies Nos. CL 299845 and 4173-5674 issued by the above named Insurance Companies to the County and in effect as of October 1, 1975 not- to exceed $5,000,000 including any umbrella coverage, which the County may be able-to obtai.n, insofar as permitted by the Constitution and Statutes of the Stata of California. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder without the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. _ C013hiY r CONT RACTOR , ,/--, Z By £hr= -ward-ofSr,^r 6g Designee Director, Human Resources Agency Dated: �*,�?t. /- • /� 7� ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk U and ex officio Clerk of the Board By Deputy RECO?_`:i.YDED FOR APPROVAL: OvJO4 Medical Director or liealth Officer . bNRifllmed wNh 4&4 WrVer - - - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Authorizing an Increase in Revolving Fund, Marshal, Richmond Judicial District On the recommendation of the County Auditor-Controller, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an increase from $50 to $100 in the revolving fund of the Marshal, Richmond Judicial District, is AUTHORIZED. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Orig: Administrator witness my hand and the Seo)of the Board of Supervisors cc: Marshal, Richmond affixed this 28thday of September--, 1976 Judicial District Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey Deputy Clerk Maxine M.Noufeg 0050.5 H-24 3/76!Sm _ ; ,•°+tea ,. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 1976 In the Matter of Appointing Sue McCoy as Intermediate Typist Clerk- Project, Health Department IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Sue McCoy is APPOINTED to the fifth step of Intermediate Typist Clerk-Project in the Health Department, to be assigned to and paid for by the WIC Program, as recommended by the County Administrator. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the seal of the Board of Orig: Administrator supe cc: Health Officer affixed tha28th day of September . 1976 Auditor-Controller Personnel Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk fiaaxirle M.Ne !d H-24 3/76 15m 00506(J V 6 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 ' 19 76 In the Matter of ` Consulting Services Agreements, Shore Acres, Clyde and West Pittsburg Improvements. (Work Order No. 4350-665) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute agreements with Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. of Martinez providing for the preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed Shore Acres, Clyde and West Pittsburg Improvements project, with a payment limit of $10,000 for work done under Phase 1 and a payment limit of $154,000 for work done under Phase 11 of Che Agreement. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Road Design Division Supervisors cc Public Works Director ofSxed this 29tt day of - 197-6 . Leptien-Cronin-Cooper yamR W County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk ey, r, Deputy Clerk r 0050 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 1;j�_pecial' Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. (a) public Agency: County of Contra Costa (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Leptien-Cronin-C o er Inc. 3604 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, CA 9 553 (c) Effective Date: September 2A_ 1976 (d) P r o j e c les aPittsmeWECelydg-i2h �fdt1 crori� W-0. 4350-665 , a o . (e) Payment Limit:pha,P I S i n.nnn '2. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CONSULTADI By signate o i al capacity Jaf business Stat, alifornia ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNO14LEDGMENT (CC §1190.1) . The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and 'ackno7wl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date: PUBLIC AGENCY Notary Public (SEAL) - FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Cline John $..Clausen County Counsel Public Wor D 'tor , By ( _ I � By• Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of- policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertaining to the work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix B (1(�5(�` 7/76 t/V VV APPENDIX "A" ` SCOPE OF WORK To prepare an application for submittal by the County of Contra Costa to the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Develop- ment Administration. The application is for Federal grant funds pursuant to 53201 , Public Works Employment Bill . The Consultant shall , in collaboration with and subject to the approval of County Staff, select likely areas needing public improve- ments which might qualify for grant funds. He shall perform neces- sary surveys, investigations and evaluations, prepare exhibits, maps, diagrams, and estimates, and construction plans to the eitent necessary to support and document the application for grant funds. The Consultant shall prepare a draft of the application for the County for submittal to the Economic Development Administration and be ready and willing to enter into a subsequent agreement for the preparation of detailed plans, working drawings, -surveys, and contract administration as may be required by the-County in the event the grant application Is approved and funds received. This agreement is not contingent upon the receipt, by the County of the grant funds. The areas to be investigated and incorporated in the application and plans are generally the West Pittsburg, Shore Acres, and Clyde areas. i 00509 i APPENDIX COMPENSATION OF CONSULTANT For services performed by Consultants the County shall pay Consultant at the , .,;; ;. following hourly rates: Engineer $38.50/hour •' 58.50/hour ' 2 Man Survey Party - :'-• Draftsman _ 18.00/hour ..s•v.,. •1r• , - - •' ,rte`_p»�. . '•rf 00510 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Special Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. (a) Public Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Leotien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. 3604 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, CA 9 553 (c) Effective Date: September 28, 1976 if . Pit •r �1-. — e - - 00510 .F ,,.�� CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMEPJT 1. Special Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. (a) Public Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. 3604 Alhambra Avenue, Martinez, CA 9 553 (c) Effective Date: September 28, 1976 (d) Project Name, NumbWert&PiL6scbautr�-Clyde-Shore Acres Road Improvement 4leriE-Cyder. 45066 (e) Payment Limit: $154,000 = Phase If 2. Signatures. These sign turesst the parties' agreement hereto: CONSULTANT .P9-7 7 ' By 1 ( signate of cia capacity in bu i ess State o California ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC §1190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date: ' PUBLIC AGENCY Notary Public (SEAL) FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Cline John B 1 usen County Counsel Public or s D re for � n Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency i and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a Dart hereof. - 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7• . Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. R T-rni n^ti ne ^t it- nnti nn Prnhl i n A - nev m-v t rmi n t thi The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date: PUBLIC AGENCY Notary Public (SEAL) FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Cline John B 1 usen Count Counsel Public Jor�js D re for y ! Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on the above date, the above-named Public Agency i and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a Dart hereof. - 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificatea or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertaining to the work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid', without duplication, all amounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. - 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix a 00511 7/76 Page 1 of 2 APPENDIX "A" SCOPE OF WORK A. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The project consists of the construction of drainage improvements, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street pavement construction, resurfacing and widening to various widths in the following locations: LOCATION I - Unincorporated area of West Pittsburg as bounded by the City of Pittsburg on the east, Willow Pass Road ori the north, Canal Road on .south and Madison Avenue on the west and includes the following streets; Madison Avenue, Bay View Avenue, Cleveland-' Avenue Franklin Avenue, Saponi Lane, Bella Monte, Bella Vista Avenue, Mt. View Avenue, Loftus Road, Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson North, South, Rose, Pensacola, Hanlon Way, Roberts, Rancho, and Monticello Streets. LOCATION II - Clyde includes the following streets: Kilburn Street, Middlesex Street, Essex Street, Sussex Street, Park Street, Wellington Avenue, and Norman Street. LOCATION III - Shore Acres is bounded on the north and east' by Port Chicago Highway, on the south by Pacifica Avenue and on the west by Inlet Drive and includes the following streets: Harbor Drive, Delta Drive, Canal Drive, Breaker Drive, Beach Drive, Bay Drive, Anchor Drive, Shore Road, Skipper Road, Mar, Vista Road, Peninsula Road, Mermaid Court, and Neptune Court. B. SCOPE OF CONSULTANT'S WORK (BASIC SERVICES) 1 . The engineering services to be provided under this agreement pertain to the above described project and shall be the "Basic Services" as outlined in Section 11 , "Classification of Services" of the American Society of Civil Engineers Manual Number 45, "Consulting Engineering," dated 1975 and as specified in this scope of work_ 2. In addition to the "Basic Services," the following services shall be provided: (a) Preparation of working drawings and contract change orders as needed. There shall be no charge (addi- tional compensation to consultant) for preparation of contract change orders which are required to correct errors or omissions in the contract documents. (b) Preparation of "as built" drawings and submission of one set of said drawings to the EDA Regional Office within 60 days after completion of the project. (c) Submit a monthly report to the County and a copy of the report to the applicable EDA Regional Office covering the general progress of the job and describ- Ing any problems or factors contributing to delay. (d) Perform a prefinal inspection of the completed con- struction and as a result, prepare a punch list of items to be corrected (if applicable) . I 00512 r Page 2 of 2 B. SCOPE OF CONSULTANT'S WORK (BASIC SERVICES) (Cont.) (e) Perform a final acceptance inspection and advise the County whether or not to accept the work as performed by the contractor and his/her subcontractors. (f) Perform preliminary field surveys necessary to obtain design data. (g) Perform construction surveys necessary- to delineate lines and grades for the contractor during the course of construction. This agreement shall not become effective until the grant application for funding Is- approved and the Public Works' Director authorizes the work to proceed. i i 00513 _ •� � ..•-�j T =.fir .� ,i-•Z ..r f `zR►r�.+'��y�j' /( ! ••J '� I ! � V�i LMS. APPENDIX "B" F COMPENSATION OF CONSULTANT _ Compensation for services outside the scope of this agreement shall be at the -following hourly rates, paid upon monthly billing. Engineer . . . . . . . . .$38-50 per hour 2 Man Survey Party . . . . 58.50 per hour 3 Man Survey Party . . . . 80.00 per hour- Draftsman our Draftsman . . . . . . . . 25.00 per hour End APPENDIX "B" . 005.14 1 n _ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on ) the Request of Mr. Edward F. ) Biggs, Applicant, (1997—RZ) ) September 28, 1976 to Rezone Land in the ) El Sobrante Area. ) Willow Road Proaerties, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the request of Mr. Edward F. Biggs (1997—RZ) to rezone certain land in the El Sobrante area from Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District-3 (N-3); and The Planning Commission on August 17, 1976 in its Resolution Number 54-1976 having recommended that the aforesaid rezoning request be approved as to change from Single Family Residential District-7 (R-7) to Multiple Family Residential District-4 (M--4), in lieu of the applicant"s request for M-3 zoning; and Mr. Harvey Bragdon, Assistant Director of Planning, having advised that staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and Mr. Biggs having appeared and stated that his original" request for M-2 zoning was subsequently amended by him to 24-3, but that he would agree to the proposed M-4 zoning; and The following persons having appeared in opposition to the proposal: Mir. T. J. Coll, attorney representing El Sobrante residents, stated development would increase existing traffic problems and urged postponement until a General Plan review of the area is completed; Mr. S. C. Holter, 525 Rincon Road; Mr. G. H. Schmidt, repesenting E1 Sobrante Dalley Planning and Zoning Committee; Ms. Helen M. Clark, 543 Appian Way; Ms. Sally Correia, 106 Kristen Lane; and Mr. Bragdon, responding to a Board question, stated that the E1 Sobrante General Plan review is only in the pre— liminary stages and will not be completed for some time; and Mr. Biggs, speaking in rebuttal, stated that the proposal was compatible with surrounding property and that, in his opinion, apartment dwellings are needed in the area, and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that he is aware of the existing traffic problem, and having suggested that the other Board members view the site and decision be rendered in two weeks; �Jr`1� IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the request of Mr. Biggs is CLOSED and October 12, 1976 at 11:15 a.m. is FIXED for decision thereon. PASSED by the Board on September 28,-1976:1' I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 28th day of September, 1976. J. OLSSON, CLERK Ron Deputy— Cleric cc: Air. E. F. Biggs Willow Road Properties Director of Planning O0516 • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Addendum No. 1 to Plans and Special Provisions for the Treat Boulevard/ Willow Pass Road Median Landscaping Project, Walnut Creek and Pittsburg Area. (Project No. 4861-4324-661-76) The Public Works Director having recommended that the Board approve and concur in the issuance of Addendum No. I to the plans and special provisions of the Treat Boulevard/Willow Pass Road Median Landscaping project, Walnut Creek and Pittsburg areas, said Addendum revising the requirements of Contra Costa County Water District and Bay Water Service in installing water control components, there being no change in the Engineer's estimated construction costs IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Sea[of the Board of Originator: Public Works Department SupervisorsRoad Design Division affixed thisMA day of R i9 7(0 cc Public Works Director Lept i en-Cron i n-Cooper J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By �t , Deputy, Clerk 006"1 H-24 1176 lyra y. x CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California A D D E N D U M N 0. 1 To The PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS For The TREAT BOULEVARD - WILLOW PASS ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING PROJECT Project No. 4861-4324-661-76 PLANS: Sheet 3: "Water Meter (1-1/2") shall read - "Water Meter (3/411) (Supplied by Contra Costa County Water District.)" Sheet 3: "Double Check Valve (1-1/2") shall read - "Double Check Valve (1-1/2") (Supplied by Contra Costa County Water District.)" Sheet 5: "Water Meter WT' shall read - "Water Meter 0") (Supplied by Bay Water Service.)" Sheet 5: "Double Check Valve (I") shall read - "Double Check Valve (111) (Supplied by Contractor.)" SPECIAL PROVISIONS: Section 9.4 Paragraph I shall read - "The double check valve assembly shall consist of two gate valves and two check valves, all with flanged cast iron bodies Check valves shall have field testing cocks, interior surfaces coated with zinc, all brass closing members with soft neoprene discs and stainless steel hinge pins. Test cocks and other fittings and nipples shall be red brass. Components of device shall be factory matched. The size shall be as shown on the plans. This assembly will be supplied by Contra Costa County Water District at the Treat Boulevard site and by the Contractor at the Willow Pass Site." - 1 - 00518 ADDENDUM N0. 1 - Willow Pass Road Treat Boulevard in Project Median Landscap 9 , %.L full „ • i q , it I ,.11 AI t- u "The double check valve assembly shall consist of two gate valves and two check valves, all with flanged cast Iron bodies Check valves shall have field testing cocks, interior surfaces coated with zinc, all brass closing members with soft neoprene discs and stainless steel hinge pins. Test cocks and other fittings and nipples shall be red brass. Components of device shall be factory matched. The size shall be as shown on the plans. This assembly will be supplied by Contra Costa County Water District at the Treat Boulevard site and by the Contractor at the Willow Pass Site." ' r ADO...- EHDUM N0. 1 ` Treat Boulevard - Willow Pass Road Median Landscaping Project SPECIAL PROV� l� SIONS (Continued} shall - Section 9.6 Paragraph t ll read s (2) and the Treat II viding and installing ,.installation fees for the water meter Boulevard double check valve assemb Y. pro iping, sleeves, the Willow Pass double check valve assembly, all p .I Acknowledgement Bidders must acknowledge receiptd f belowthis Aand nreturned with the t must be shown in the space p rovor under separate cover and Bid Proposal a.m`�d on October 1or to the 2. hour i97(, set for the opening 1 ' Acknowledged: Bidder: By: Title: pate: - 2 - ff y; 0 V�1a3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2$ 19 76 In the Matter of Consulting Services Agreements, Rollingwood, Rodeo, Crockett, and El Sobrante Improvements. (Work Order Nos. 4353-925 s 4357-925) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute agreements with Santina and Thompson Consulting Civil Engineers, Inc. , of Walnut Creek providing for the preparation of plans and specifications for the proposed Rollingwood, Rodeo, Crockett and El Sobrante Improvements project, payment for work done under the Phase I Agreement shall not exceed $9,500 and under the Phase II Agreement shall not exceed $22,300, said project to be submitted for funding under Title I of the Public Works Employment Act of 1976. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: Public Works Department Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Road Design Division Supervisors cc Public Works Director affixed this 28tWay of September . 79 y Santina S Thompson County Auditor-Controller n J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By �. `.�;r¢• c/ . Deputy Cleric A, Jos4ph 00520 CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT Special Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by reference. (a) Public Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) Consultant's Name & Address: SANTINA E THOMPSON 1766 Locust Street, Walnut Creek, CA -9 59 (c) Effective Date: September 28, 1976 (d) �°ro�jec "' d aret, treets- - dame u er & Location: Lroc ett/Rodeo/Ei Sobrante Area Streets W.O. (e) Payment Limit:Phase ii W,o. 43S3-S8,300 w.o. 4357-$14,000 4353 2. Signatures These gna s attest the parties' agreement hereto: BONS LTAN c pacity in business State ofTr*"signat_e� Iciai lifornia ) ss Contra -Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC §1190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business. capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowl-' edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date: ' PUBLIC AGENCY Notary Public (SEAL) FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Cline John B lausen Count Counsel Public Works Dire J' // n Y i ( Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on th above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually agree and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such employment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish- certificates -or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment at any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertaining to the work possessed by him or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, all amounts due or.-thereafter becoming- due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided ,hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix B 00521 E N APPENDIX "A" SCOPE OF WORK DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT A. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The project shall consist of- the construction of: • 1 . New curbs and drainage facilities in the Roilingwood subdivision area. 2. New structural section on Winslow Street. 3. Overlay on Pomona Street, Santa Rita Road, California Street and the Bayo Vista area, Vaqueros Avenue, and Seventh Street. B. SCOPE OF CONSULTANT'S WORK (BASIC SERVICES) 1 . The engineering services to be provided under this agreement pertain to the above Described project and shall be the "Basic Services" as outlined in Section It , "Classification of Services"' of the American Society of Civil Engineers Manual Number 45, "Consulting Engineering," dated )975 and as specified in this scope of work. 2. in addition to the "Basic Services," the following services shall be provided: (a) Preparation of working drawings and contract change orders as needed. There shall be no charge (additional compensation to consultant) for preparation of contract change orders which are required to correct errors or omissions in the contract documents. (b) Preparation of "as built" drawings and submission of one set of said drawings to the EDA Regional Office within 60 days after completion of the project. (c) Submit a monthly report to the County and a copy of the report to the applicable EDA Regional Office covering the general progress of the job and describ- ing any problems or factors contributing to delay,. (d) Perform a pre-final inspection of the completed con- struction and as a result prepare a punch list of items to be corrected (if appli.cabie) . (e) Perform a final acceptance inspection and advise the County whether or not to accept the work as performed by the contractor and his/her subcontractors. (f) Perform preliminary field surveys necessary to obtain design data. This agreement shall not become effective until the application for funding is approved and the Public Works D = authorizes the work to proceed. I � Effective ;July 1, 1976 • through Dec. 31, 1976* APPENDIX B SANTINA & THOMPSON - CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. HOURLY CHARGE RATES Principal (for appearance at public , meetings) $42 Principal or Associate (at coordination meetings) . . . . . . . . . . . $40 Associate or pnin+cipal . . . . . . . . . . . . $38 • Engineer . •. $33' Sr.- Draftsman . . . . =. $27 - Clerical 27 -Clerical 6 . . $14 : Survey Crews 3 Man Party .• . $83 2 Man Party . $65 . Reproductions in excess of quoted: - Blueline prints . . . 110/sf : Sepia Prints . . . . . . 360/sf ' Mileage outside normal contract work 150/mi _ Misc. expenditures outside normal contract work . . . . . . . . . . Cost + 10% To be increased on Jan. 1, 1977 and every 6 months thereafter, by the San Francisco Bay Area Inflation Index increase for the. a ;;�, previous 6 months. CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT 1. Spacial Conditions. These Special Conditions are incorporated below by .reference. (a) Public Agency: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (b) Consultant's Name & Address: Santina s Thompson 1766 Locust Street , Walnut Creek. CA 94596 (c) Effective Date: September 28, 1976 Roilingwood Area S ree s roc e o eo o ran e eStreets (d) Project Name, Number & Loca.ion: u_n_ 4353-975 (e) Payment Limit-Phase i w.o. 4353 - $3,500 w.o. 4357 - $6,000 2. SignaturS$. These T ures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CONSULTANR - C By ;, nT Desig f ficial capacity in business) State oY California ) ss Contra Costa County ) ACKNOWLEDGMENT (CC §1190.1) The person signing above for Consultant, known to me in those individual and business capacities, personally appeared before me today and acknowl- edged that he signed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a resolution of its Board of Directors. Date: ' Notary Public (SEAL) PUBLIC AGENr Y FORM APPROVED Vernon L. Cline Public Works Dir John C ausen County Counsel By• By: ' j Deputy 3. Parties. Effective on a above date, the above-named Public Agency and Consultant mutually a ee and promise as follows: 4. Employment. Public Agency hereby employes Consultant, and Consultant accepts such, emplovment, to perform the professional services described herein, upon the terms and in consideration of the payments stated herein. 5. Scope of Service. Scope of service shall be as described in Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 6. Insurance. The Consultant shall, at no expense to Public Agency, furnish certificates or other evidence acceptable to Public Agency of (a) public liability insurance of at least $250,000 for all damages arising out of bodily injuries or death to any one person and at least $500,000 for two or more persons in one accident or occurrence; and (b) property damage liability insurance providing for a limit of not less than $50,000. Thirty days' notice of policy lapse or cancellation is required. 7. Payment. Public Agency shall pay Consultant for professional services I ! performed at the rates shown in Appendix B attached hereto, which include all overhead and incidental expenses, for which no additional compensation shall be allowed. In no event shall the total amount paid to the Consultant exceed the payment limit specified in Sec. 1(e) without prior written approval of the Contra Costa County Public Works Director. Consultant's statement of charges shall be submitted at convenient intervals. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days after receipt of each statement. lilhll l 8. Termination. At its option, Public Agency may terminate this agree- ment-at gree-mentat any time by written notice to the Consultant, whether or not the Consultant is in default. Upon such termination, Consultant agrees to turn over to Public Agency everything pertaining to the work possessed by i' him .or under his control at that time, and will be paid, without duplication, ii all amounts due or thereafter becoming due on account of services rendered to the date of termination. ll'II'' 9. Status. The Consultant is an independent contractor, and is not to be considered an employee of Public Agency. Ij 10. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, save, and- hold harmless Public Agency and its officers and employees from any and all liability for any injury or damages arising from or connected with the services provided lil'Ih,l IIC hereunder by Consultant or any person under its control. Attachements Appendix A Appendix s -0052U 7/76 APPEND I X "A" SCOPE OF WORK To 'prepare an application for submittal by the County of • Contra Costa to the United States Department of Commerce, Economic _ Development Administration. The application Is for Federal grant funds pursuant to S3201 , Public Works Employment Bill . The Consultant shall , in collaboration with and subject to the approval of County Staff, select likely areas needing public..,. Improvements which might qualify for grant funds. He shall perform necessary surveys, investigations and evaluations, prepare exhibixs, maps, diagrams, and estimates, and construction plans to the extent necessary to support and document the application for grant funds. The Consultant shall prepare a draft of the application for the County for submittal to the Economic Development Administration and be ready and willing to enter into a subsequent agreement for the preparation of detailed plans, working drawings, surveys, and contract -administration as may be required by the County in the event the grant application is approved and funds received. This agreement is -not contingent upon the receipt, by the County, of the grant funds. FI ^ 4 dy r r *fes '3x -Ti. ""'f tit 00525 Effective .'July 1, 1976 • through Dec. 31, 1976* = APPENDIX H ' SANTINA & THOMPSON CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, INC. HOURLY CHARGE RATES Principal (for appearance at public r _ meetings) $42 - Principal 42 "Principal or Associate (at coordination meetings) $40 Associate or .principal . . . 0 . $38. . Engineer $33 •_ . .' . .. .- . . .� Sr. Draftsman $27 .. .. . `. - Clerical 0 • : . $14 , Survey Crews 3 Man Party . • • •• . $83 ' 2 Man Party . . • • • $65- Reproductions 65-Reproductions in excess of quoted: Blueline-prints 110/of ' Sepia Prints . . . . . . . . . . 36C/sf Mileage outside normal contract work . . . . 150/mi Misc. expenditures outside normal contract work •• Cost t 10% To be increased on Jan. 1, 1977 and every 6 months thereafter, by the San Francisco Bay Area Inflation Index increase for the previous 6 months. �`(�� C 5,?(O 4 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 019 76 In the Matter of Therapeutic Swimming Pool, George Tiller Jr. Memorial — West. The :hoard having received a September 18, 1976 letter from Mrs. Dorothy Brooks, Chairman, Hilltop Center Swimming Pool Committee, transmitting ;,9,500 check from the Hilltop Center rarents Group for architect's fees for design of the therapeutic swimming pool to be constructed at George Miller Jr. Memorial — West; IT IS OPJB3BD that the Board accepts said donation with grateful appreciation. PASSBD by the Board on September 28, 1976. i 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Hilltop Center Supervisors Parents Group affixe 2301 Hilltop Dr. d this 28thday of Sebtember . 19 76 Richmond, CA 94800 Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor . _/ County Administrator BY �ar hall - Deputy Gerk Helen C. Marshall , py 0052'7 ` H-24 3/76 15m I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Request for Recognition, Hospital and Institutional workers' Union, Local 250. The Board having received a September 14, 1976 letter from Gyres David Watkins, Business Agent, Hospital and Institutional Workers' Union, Local 250 of the Service Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, providing certain information and requesting recog- nition in accordance with Section 34-10.004 of the County Ordinance Code; IT IS BY TIM BOARD ORD • that the aforesaid request is REFERIM. to the Employee Relations Officer for verification of required information. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. ' 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Hospital and Institutional Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Workers' Union supermsors Employee Relations affixed this 28thday of September , 19 76 Officer nn' Lj J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By l i.� 6, i"/'•f�'�' 4.,r_& . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 0052$ H-24 3176 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Resolution of Alameda County Board of Supervisors with respect to Property Tax Relief and Reform. t This Board having received a resolution adopted September 14, 1976 by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors 1 requesting the Governor to call a special session of the Legis— lature to deal with property tax relief and reform, and urging I the other counties to take similar action; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to the Administration and finance Committee (Supervisors W. R. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) and the County Administrator. PASSEM by the Board. on September 28, 1976. i f E hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board Committee County Administrator supervisors County Counsel affixed this 28thday of September , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By�U. ��u l . Deputy Clerke en L-'Farsha 6 } 0052 H-24 3n6 15m - F i {K In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 7,6 In the Matter of Mobile Home Parks. The Board having received a September 17, 1976 letter from Air. C. M. tiilson, 2280 Valley Parkway #68, Escondido, California 92027 suggesting that provision be made for one or two mobile home parks in the area between ttalnut Creek and San Ramon; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid communication is REFERRED to the Director of Planning. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. C. M. .1ilson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Administrator affixed this28th day of September 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk f . {_ < Q, Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl OU53U H-24;/76 ism . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 76 In the Matter of Proposed State Farmworker Housing Assistance Plan. The Board having received a September 10, 1976 letter from Mr. Arnold Sternberg, Director, State Department of Housing and Community Development, and 1.1r. Luis Contreras, Chairman, California Advisory Committee on Farmworker Housing and Community Development, transmitting a copy of the proposed State Farmworker Housing Assistance Plan for review, and inviting participation in public hearings on said plan; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid plan is REFERRED to the Director of Planning. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc- Vir. A. Sternberg Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. L. Contreras Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this28thday of September 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By t t ..��n �. C . Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl 00531 H-N 3/76!Sm ;y c In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Se pmhpr 2R . 19 2.61. In the Matter of - Claim for Damages. 14r. Maurice S. Moyal, 1820 Galindo Street, Suite 210 Concord, California 94520 having filed a claim for damages on behalf of Mr. Richard Van Roman, 902 Taylor Street, Albany, California 94706 on August 24, 1976 in the amount of $52,500; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Claimant Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Public 'dorks Director Supervisors Attn: ,'•Ir. Broatch affixed tha28th day of September ,, 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y _ Deputy Clerk on a a H-24 i176 1Sm 00532 I MAURCE S. MOYAL MOYAL and LOMrENSTEIN 2 A Professional Corporation i 1820 Galindo Street, Suite 210 Concord, California 94520 � � L E D 4 (415) 686-0200 5 Attorneys for Claimant AUG42 1 1976 6 1. R N CLERK so r suPE/T/1500.5 �OA.1 CO. ! iL '-� "LLF 8 i 9 In the matter of the claim of CLAIM PURSUANT TO SECTION 910 GOVERNMENT CODE 10 RICHARD VAN ROMAN, I1 ' Claimant 12 vs 13 THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendant 16 17 MAURICE S. MOYAL, on behalf of RICHARD VAN ROMAN, hereby presents IS this claim to the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, pursuant to Government Code 19 Section 910. 20 I 21 The name and post office address of claimant is as follows: 212 RICHARD VAN ROMAN 23 902 Taylor Street 24 Albany, California 25 II 20 The pest office address to v:hich claimant desires notices to be sent -', regarding this claim is: 28 00533 rd, I c/o JvIAURICE S. MOYAL Attorney at Law 2 1820 Galindo Street, Suite 210 Concord, California 94520 1 C/o MAURICE S. MOYAL Attorney at Law 2 1820 Galindo Street, Suite 210 Concord, California 94520 3 4 III 5 On June 25, 1976, at approximately 1:45 a.m., two deputy sheriffs em- 6 ployed by the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department arrested the claimant, 7 8 RICHARD VAN ROMAN, on a charge of violation of Section 207 0£the Penal 9 Code of the State of California. 10 IV 11 Said arrest by the t-.+o deputy sheriffs employed by the Sheriff Is Departmen 12 of the County of Contra Costa, State of California was done within the course 13 and scope of their employment. The acts of the said two deputy sheriffs 14 constituted false arrest and false imprisonment of the claimant herein. That 15 16 said act of arrest was without justification. 17 V is The true names of the arresting officers are presently unknown to the 19 claimant herein and for purposes of this claim, claimant asserts that the name 20 of the officers were DOE I and DOE II. That in truth and in fact, said names 21 are fictitious and the true names will be inserted when ascertained if requeste 22 by the County of Contra Costa. _23 VI 24 25 So far as is known to the claimant at the date of filing this Claim, said 26 claimant, RICHARD VAN ROMAN,, has incurred obligations in the sum of 2; ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,500.00) as attorney's fees for 28 the defense of the criminal action charged herein, to wit, Section 207 and 00534 -2- 1 Section 211 of the Penal Code of the State of California. 2 VIII 3 At the time of presentation of this Claim, RICHARD VAN ROMAN, by and 4 through his attorney, MAURICE S. MOYAL, claims damages in the sum of 5 ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000.00) due to loss of earnings, and FIFTY 6 THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) due to damages for embarrassment, 7 S humiliation and mental suffering. 9 10 DATED: August 18,1976 I1 MOYAL and LOEWENSTEIN 12 13 BY I C'J MAURICE S. MOYAL, Atto for Claimant 14 15 16 17 IS 19 20 21 22 23 2; 25 26 27 28 -3- QVW5, ' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 . 19 —26 In the Matter of Claim for Damages. Mr. Robert G. Nykodym, 207 37th Street, Richmond, California 94805 having filed a claim for damages on behalf of Mr. Raymond Davis, I Parker Avenue, Rodeo, California 94572 on August 23, 1976 in the amount of $5,000; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that that aforesaid claim is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Claimant - Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public ilorks Director Supervisors Attn: lir. Broatch affixed this28thday of September , 19 76 County Counsel County Administrator _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk L Q . Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl H-24 4176 I im 0053,P) 1 r•.OBE rr r NIYRODYM Attorney at Law 2 207 37th Street I L E D Richmoad, CA 94805 3 (415) 235-2770u 23 ,,,�,aj 4 Attorney for Claimant X976 J. R 5 CLERK SUfElVISOAS T ACO. 6 7 I`1 TnE MATTZITZ OF 711 CLAIM OF 8 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES Claimant, 7. 9 -. VS. 10 COUNTY Or C10"TTR_; COSTA; COURT OF CAL1r0;z_';IA, COLN'TY Or C'.)N iii COST:%, ti.s, 12 JUDICI%I. DIS':Pi Ci, 13 fanc'an to. 14 I, C. NYXO"UY', attorney for Claimant, RAYFOWD 15 DA17I:3, ierabv and on his behalf -3resent:t this claire to the 16 Count- of Contra Costa pursuant to Section 910 of the California 17 Government Code. 18 1. Claimant is P.aymond Cavia. Date of birth: Novembers 19 1949. Currant a dres3: 1 Parker Avenue, Rodeo, California. 20 ( 2. .%nv notice. letters or corresponeence relating to -this 21 s claim.. shoule be sent to Clairiant's attorney, F.obert G. tiykodym, i 22 ' 207 37t'-: Street, nichriona, Califcrnia 94805. I 23 24 3. On or about June 1, 1976, clair.ant was arrested by the Contra Costa Countv Sheriff's Laputies pursuant to a bench 25 warrant issued by the Mrnicinal Court of the County of Contra 26 Costa, crest Judicial District. Claimant as taken to the County NMI Jail in Martinez, booked, and incarcerated where he remained over 1 nirib t lin ti 1 h • nn - R N 1949. Currant adress: 1 Parker avenue, Rodeo, California. 20 2. .env notice, letters or corres=oneen ce relating to this 21 claim!: sizo ult- h-: seat t�? Cl ai:'ant'F attorney, robert G. 2iykodym, 22 107 -7t'.. Stxe},�t, T ichrozr, Cali fczn-a 948115. 23 3. 7r. or abort „uze 1, 1976, claimant ::s arrested by 24 the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Ler,uties pursuant to a bench 25 26 warrant issued by the Municipal C-^,!rt cf- t.^e County_ of Contra Costa, west Judicial District. Ci,imant a3 t8ken to the County -1- / Jail in Martinez, booked, and incarcerated where he remained over- . 1 night until he appeared before t..e Municipal Court of the West 2 Judicial District on the following day, June 2, 1976. 3 Claimant was informed by the Court that he had been arreste 4 " on the bench warrant because of his failure to make an earlier 5 Court appearance. Claimant maintained that his attorney, Robert 'G. 6 Nykodvm, had made that appearance on his behalf. The Court 7 maintained its position that no such appearance had been made. 8 Subsequently that day, claimant's attorney, Robert G. 9 Nvkodyn, appeared in Court and after consulting with various 10 Clerks of the Municipal Court of Contra Costa County, West Judicial 11 t District, it was determined that the bench warrant had been issued } 12 as a result of a clerical error. Thereafter, claimant was 13 released on his own recognizance by the Court upon representations 14 being made to the Court by the Clerk's Office that the bench 15 warrant had been issued as a result of a clerical error. 16 4. Due to the negligence of the Municipal Court of 17 s Contra Costa County, West Judicial District, claimant was falsely 18 imprisoned and incarcerated overnight for a period of approximately 19 twenty hours. Due to being taken from his home during daylight 20 hours, arrested, and olaced in a patrol car in his neighborhood, 21 claimant suffered mental anguish and emotional distress as a result 22 of this treatment. 23 5. The nar.y--s of the public -_r:nloyaes causing the damage 24 to claimant are not known at this time but are believed to be 25 employees of tr_ Clerk's Office of the Municipal .Court. of Contra 26 -2- u I 1 Costa County, nest Judicial District. 2 6. Claimant clams general damages in the sum of $5,000.00 : . 3 1, Robert G. Nykodym, the undersigned, am the attorney 4 for the claimant, Raymond Davis,and present this claim on his 5 behalf. 6 .Dated: August 4, 1976. 7 8 ROBERT G. NY'{i ODYM 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 I8 - 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 � -3- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 20 21 22 23 24 25 Oft 26 -3- � r f 3; In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2" , 19 76 In the Matter of Requast for .report on Department of Corrections. Supervisor J. r. Kenny referred to the report of the 1975 Grand Jury relating to astaalishment of a &-)Gparbccnt of Corrections and stated his support therefor, addinq that he Felt the County A-1minist.rator's Office should coapilc an updatel report on said matter and furnish it in approximately six Wonthss and In response. Supervisor W. W. Boggess stated that the Board had already coasidered this itsa in connection With the original jail study ani that tiw concept had been rejected by the Board; ani accordingly. :e sugaeste-I that Supervisor aenny obtain this information fro:-a the County AcLeinistrator if he so desired rather than reopen the issue because the Board is already on record in opposition to it: and Sup-arvisor Xenny indicated that this was agresable with him. '"_Ii: IS A t!.a 'R -- RECORD. a matter of record I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Origz Adwinicstratcw Supervisors affixed this`8th day of September , 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk 00540 H-24 317615m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomici September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Recommendation with Respect to Termination of County Contract with Ronoh Preschool for Disturbed Children. The Board having received a September 16, 1976 letter from The Reverend Palmer Watson, Chairman of the Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that, based upon an evaluation report of one of its ad hoc committees, the Advisory Board recommends termination of the contract with the Ronoh Preschool for Disturbed Children; and The Reverend Mr. Watson having further advised that the Advisory Board recommends retention of the therapeutic nursery school component of the Ronoh School program and immediate negotiation of a contract with a legally constituted non-profit corporation to insure uninterrupted service; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid Letter is ACKNOWLEDGED and the matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• C.C.C. Mental Health Witness my hand and the Sed of the Board of Advisory Board Supervisors Director, Human Resources affixed this 28th day of September, 19,76 Agency J. Ds R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Bim` y Deputy Clark. H 24 12/74 - 15-M Vera Nelson 00541 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28, , lq 76 In the Matter of Authorizing County Treasurer- Tax Collector to Solicit Quotations for Borrowing Funds After finding that time is of the essence, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Treasurer-Tax Collector is AUTHORIZED to solicit bids with- out advertising for them from various financial institutions for the temporary borrowing of funds pursuant to Government Code Sections 53840 through 53844 in an amount not to exceed S15,000,000. Passed by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid Orig: Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: County Treasurer-Tax affixed this 28th day of September 19 76 Collector J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller B {� Deputy Clerk axine M. Neut'rd 00542 H 24 8175 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California -September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Request for Refund of Park Dedication Fees Paid in Connection with Subdivisions 4670 and 4824, Walnut Creek Area. The Board on July 6, 1976 having referred to Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, a letter from Mr. Carlo Zocchi requesting credit for land donated and refund ofpark dedication fees paid in connection with Subdivisions 4670 and 4824, Bancroft Green, Walnut Creek area; and Mr. Dehaesus having submitted a September 17, 1976 memorandum to the Board citing determinations made by the Planning Commission with respect to park dedication requirements for said subdivisions, reviewing pertinent ordinance code provisions, and suggesting that the Board may wish to refer this matter to one of its committees for further review and recommendation; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and E. A. Linscheid) and County Counsel for review. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Mr. Carlo Zocchi Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 1033 Detroit Ave. Supervisors Concord, CA 94518 _affixed this 28th day of September. 19 76 Board ommittee J. R. OLSSON Clerk County Counsel � �/' Director of Planning By l_1fia_ r Deputy Clerk H 24 12176 . 15-M Vera Nelson County Administrator 00543 RECEIVED CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SEP 21 1976 PLANNING DEPARTMENT DOWN cmc aow OF suaertv�soes 8 TO: Board of Supervisors DATE: September 17, 1976 FROM. Anthony A. Dehaesus, SUBJECT: Park Dedication Fees Director of Planni Re: Subdivisions 4670 and 4824 On July 7, 1976 the Board of Supervisors referred to me a June 10, 1976 letter from Mr. Carlo Zocchi in which he requests a refund of park dedication fees paid with the filing of Subdivisions 4670 and 4824. On June 8, 1976, Mr. Zocchi paid park dedication in-lieu fees totaling $49,392 when he filed Subdivision 4824. On December 10, 1974, Mr. Zocchi paid park dedication in-lieu fees totaling $29,711 when he filed Subdivision 4670. Both of these fees were paid under protest. In reviewing the correspondence received from Mr. Zocchi, the basis for his claims can be identified as follows: 1) Credit for private space within Sub- division 4670 was not provided and should have been given. 2) Credit for a five acre parcel donated by Philip Bancroft (prior owner) to the City of Walnut Creek should have been recognized and credit given. 3) The land values, on which the park dedication in-lieu fees were based, were too high. As to item one, the Planning Commission determined that no credit be given for private land occupied by recreation facilities in Subdivision 4670 and that in- lieu fees be paid. In this subdivision, 1.2 acres was provided for a central pavilion, swimming pool, clubhouse and play field. The Commission in disallow- ing credit was of the opinion that this acreage with these facilities was pro- vided primarily for the purpose of encouraging sales of the dwelling units within the development. Subdivisions 4670 and 4824 constitute Phase I of Mr. Zocchi's proposed approxi- mate 50 acre development known as Bancroft Green. This Phase I comprises 200 dwelling units. In gaining approval of Phase II from the Planning Commission, Condition 11 was attached which reads as follows: "Park land shall be dedicated with development of this project in accordance with the Park Land Dedication Ordinance. Approximately 1.6 acres of land with development of 194 units would be appropriate. The exact number of units and amount of land, based upon 500 square feet/D.U. shall be deter- mined when the developer submits the Final Development Plan. The land to be dedicated shall be a parcel of land located adjacent to the east property line of Heather Farms Park, with 50% credit for private space being allowed for the 1.2 acre tennis courts area (0.60 acre credit)." Miuofilmed wifli board order Board of Supervisors -2- September 17, 1976 You will note that in this instance, the developer was allowed a 50% credit (.6 acre) of the land provided for the play field and tennis courts. Because of this later action, the developer feels that a reconsideration of the credit allowance for Phase I (Subdivisions 4670 and 4824) is in order and this reconsideration should result in an allowance of at least a 50% credit such as was allowed in Phase II. Attached is a copy of the pertinent Ordinance Code Chapter (Chapter 920-8) concerning credit for private space. If you determine that a credit would be in accordance with the standards indicated, then a credit would be in order. As to item two, this requested credit has to do with an arrangement that oc- curred between the City of Walnut Creek and Mr. Bancroft. See the attached copy of a letter dated July 1, 1975 addressed to Mr. Huguet (Mr. Zocchi's attorney) from the City Attorney (Curtin) of Walnut Creek. In addition, copies of two letters dated May 25, 1967 and December 20, 1967 signed by the Walnut Creek City Attorney are attached. All of this occurred before the adoption of �. the park dedication ordinance by the County in 1971. As to item three, the developer claims that the land values applied in deter- mining the in-lieu fees for Subdivisions 4670 and 4824 were too high. The de- termined land value for Subdivision 4670 was $35,000 an acre which translates to 80¢ a square foot. Subdivision 4670 included 74 dwelling units on 9.79 acres.. Subdivision 4824 had a determined land value of $34,162 per acre which translates to 78� per square foot. Subdivision 4824 included 126 dwelling units on 14.27 acres. Values for both of these subdivisions were based on assessor's records as indicated on the 1974-75 roll. The developer claims that these values should have been determined on the basis of the number of units allowed per acre times the value per unit. In this case, he says it should be eight units per acre times $3,000 per unit equals $24,000 per acre value. Since Mr. Zocchi's June 10, 1976 letter, we have received a further review by the Assessor's Office of Mr. Zocchi's claims. This is covered by a memorandum dated June 14, 1976 (see copy attached). On the basis of this memorandum, we suggest that the land value for Subdivisions 4670 and 4824 be adjusted to $32,000 an acre. If you accept this adjustment, then a refund of $6,103 would be in order. If you provide a 50% credit for the land value of the recreational facility as requested in item one, then an additional refund of $19,200 would be in order. If you allow the five acre credit as requested in item two, then the entire $79,103 paid under protest would be refunded plus having a standing credit of 2.7 acres of park land dedication toward future development of Phase II. In order to more fully review this matter, the Board may wish to refer this re- port to a Board committee to provide a recommendation. AAD:EMA cc - County Administrator County Counsel Supervisor Moriartyrz Carlo Zocchi !' Maurice E. Huguet order, of u,tu..L m., ur, i a ieow .rd or o,103 would be in � 5 ° If you provide a 50% credit for the land value of the recreational facility as requested in item one, then an additional refund of $19,200 would be in order. If you allow the five acre credit as requested in item two, then the entire $79,103 paid under protest would be refunded plus having a standing credit of 2.7 acres of park land dedication toward future development of Phase II. In order to more fully review this matter, the Board may wish to refer this re- port to a Board committee to provide a recommendation. AAD:EMA cc - County Administrator County Counsel Supervisor Moriarty : Carlo Zocchi Maurice E. Huguet c Chapter 920-8 PRIVATE SPACE Sections: 920-8.002 Credit for private space. 920-5.004 Standards. 920.8,002 Credit for private space. Where private area for park and recreational purposes is provided in a proposed development and such arca is to be privately owned and maintained by the future owner(s) of the development, such area(s)shall be credited against the requirement of land dedication or fees payment, if the planning agency finds that it is in the public interest to do so and that all the standards set forth in Section 920-80043 are met_(Ord.71-84 § 1 (part), 1971). 920-8004 Standards. These standards are: (1) That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open areas, required to be maintained by the zoning and building ordinances and rcbnrlations, shall not be included in the computation of such private area;and (2) That the private ownership and maintenance of the area is adequately provided for by recorded written agreement,covenants or restrictions;and (3) That the use of the private area is restricted for park and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of the future owners of property within the tract and which cannot be amended or eliminated without the consent of the county, or its successor;and (4) That the proposed private area is reasonably adaptable for use for park or recreational purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size,shape,topography,geology. access,and location:and (5) That facilities proposed for the area are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreational element of the general plan. (Ord. 71-84§ t (part), 1971). 4 OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY Q TY HALL John R. Shaw DANIEL J.CURTIN,JR WALNUT CREEK!CALIFCRNIA 94596 )\`i f_• f•Y/I D mutes-x?6: m CIT/ATMR,KT (413) 933-3300 Af!'T. CRT ATiORN[Y JUL 15 3 28 PH'75 July 1, 1975 °L4FiD.R; z"'.!r NI Dlr. Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. 925 Main Street Martinez, California 94553 RE: Bancroft Greens Dear Maurv• In response to your recent letter concerning the dedication of 5 acres to the City of Walnut Creek by the Bancroft family in 1968, please be advised that my further detailed review of the files on the dedication of 5 acres and subsequent purchase of additional 7 acres, reveal the following events. During a period of time from 1956-61, the Bancroft family deeded to the City of Walnut Creek certain acreage of land in the vicinity of the now Heather Farms Park, approximately 5 acres. The various deeds contained a condition that the title would vest in certain con- tingent remaindermen (to-wit the Mt. Diablo Unified School District or Diablo Junior Museum) upon notice to the City Clerk if the City failed to acquire a majority portion of the lake located on !leather Farms within four years of the date of the deeds. The City was not able to acquire the land and on January 3, 1964, Lloyd E. Christianson, Assistant City Attorney of Walnut Creek, in an opinion letter to Mrs. Wallis •(the then Director of Parks s Recreation) stated that title has vested in the remaindermen for the 1956 transaction and the property referred to in the 1960 transaction would vest on February 3, 1964. In early 1967 the Bancroft family was approached by the City to ascertain whether or not it would be possible to clear tit-le to the City of the 5 acres and to see if the City could purchase an additional 7 acres for the expansion of Heather Farms Park. A pro- posal was made that if the City could acquire clear title to the 5 acres without any payment of money, the City would purchase an additional 7 acres for $15,000 per acre which was our then appraisal price. This matter was discussed with the City Council on May 22, 1967, and a tentative proposal was accepted whereby if 5 acres were dedicated to the City and 7 acres were purchased by the City at $15,000 per acre, that a credit could be given against future park- land dedication requirements for the 5 acres if the area was developed in the City. On May 25, 1967, the City Manager and I met with the Bancroft family and it was agreed that this procedure would be appropriate. The May 25, 1967, letter was a result of that meeting and that is the letter which you referred to and apparently which Mr. Bancroft has given to you. 005, 47 Mr. Maurice E. Huguet, Jr. July 1, 1975 Page 2 As a result, after many discussions and meeting with title company representatives and the Junior Museum Board of Directors, this office prepared a contract of sale and accommodation between the City and the Bancrofts. Clause 3 of that agreement read as follows: "City will give credit pursuant to the provisions of Section 10-1.516 of the Walnut Creek Municipal Code (park land dedication ordinance) to Bancrofts or their assigns for five acres of land conveyed for park and recreational purposes. This credit shall be given at the time of approval of the final subdivision map on these properties described in Exhibit A herein." At that time the Bancrofts wanted interest in the amount of %6 from October 1, 1967, when apparently the City had use of this five acres. The Council at its meeting of December 18, 1967, approved the purchase of the seven acres but did not wish to pay interest. My notes indicate that at the December 18, 1967, meeting, attended by members of the Bancroft family, Mr. Bancroft wanted the credit provisions removed and would rely on early Council's "wishes". On December 20, 1967, I sent a letter to the Council, copy of which is attached, indicating that the Bancrofts would waive the interest requirement as long as the escrow closed. The agreement was never executed because of the December 18, 1967 discussion and the escrow closed pursuant to written escrow instructions. Therefore, in conclusion, there is no written agreement between the City and the Bancrofts relating to land dedication credit, even though this matter had been discussed. ' Very trul urs, L J. U I , JR.�� DJC':'pap Enclosure 00141 > _ vq�F�f�rfsla, NNW May 25, 1967 Messrs. Philip Bancroft 1500 Bancroft Road Walnut Creek, California Gentlemens This is to confirm our understanding arrived at today at a meeting in my office, attended by yourselves, Mr. Snyder and Councilman Peter Howard, that you will sell seven acres of your land adjacent to Sheppard Road to the City for use in con- junction with the City's community park located at Heather Farms and, in addition, you will dedicate an additional five acres to the City for park purposes. It was understood that the City will pay $15,000 an acre for the seven acres of land and will give you, or your assigns, credit under the park land dedication ordinance for the five acres to be deeded. This credit is to bo given at the time the land is to be developed. Before using the land dedicated and bought, the City is agreeable to installing a suitable fence at least six feet in height to protect the remainder of your property. The proposed 12 acre site to be purchased and deeded will be shifted up to the north, beginning at your westerly northern boundary. As soon as the City's engineers have prepared the plan and draw up the necessary legal descriptions, I will be in touch with you. Meanwhile, I will have the title company start working on the method by which the title to the original five acres can be cleared up. The City certainly appreciates your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, DANIEL J. CURTIN, JR. DJCsdl ccs City Manager City Council bcc: Dir. of Public Works Dir. of Parks b Rec. 00549 .v ' OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY ,. DANIEL J.CURTIN.JR. CITY HALL TELEPHONE CITY ATTORRET WALNUT CREEK.CALIFORNIA 94799 973.7700 December 20,- 1967 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City Hall Walnut Creek, California RE: Purchase of 7 acres from Bancroft family adjacent to Heather Farms Gentlemen: Since your Council action on December 18, 1967, I discussed the matter of the City Council's reluctance to pay the interest of 6% which the family wanted. (Today Mr. Bancroft, Sr. informed me that the family will waive the interest requirement as long as the escrow for the purchase for the seven acres is closed this year. Therefore, in view of your authorization on Monday, this office and the Public works Department will prepare the necessary documents to purchase the seven acres for X105,000. Very tru o• s, D L J. I , J DJC:dl cc: City Manager Dir. of Public Works Dir. of Finance City Treasurer' 00550 Office of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ASSESSOR R 83.1 Court Streets Martinez, California 94553 June 14, 1976 • AN 14 3 ,16 p!t '76 - TO: Anthony A. 6hiesus, Director of Planning FROM: A. J agorio, Deputy Assessor SUBJECT: Carlo Zocchi Property Valuation - Ygnacio and Bancroft Roads, Walnut Creek Reference a request regarding the 1974-75 valuation of the subject property for the determination of park dedication fees. Our recommenda- tion of the allocated land value for 1974-75 is as follows: Southerly 25.00 Ac. @ $41,100 per Ac. $1,027,700 Northerly 50.82 AC. @ 32,000 per Ac. 1,626,400 75.82 Ac. $2,654,100 This allocation involves the following assessor's parcels: 144-060-001, 002, 013, and 144-010-006. The original 1974-75 valuation was based upon an overall projected general plan amendment proposal of 760 units or 10 units per gross acre at $3500 per unit, and a total value of $2,654,100. Subsequent discussion with Mr. Halverson of your staff indicates that under existing N-3 zoning higher density useage could have been antici- pated in the southerly 25 acres, and a correspondingly lower density on the remaining 50.82 acres. The 1974-75 valuation is herein allocated accordingly. Consequently, park dedication fees for the northerly portion of the property (Tract 4670) should be calculated on the basis of $32,000 Ac. y. J: AJL/bhp Ua551 A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Executive Session. At 9:45 a.m. the Board recessed to meet in Executive Session in Room 108, County Administration Building, Martinez, California to consult with its representatives in connection with discussions of salary matters (pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) and to discuss a litigation matter with County Counsel; At 10:35 a.m. the Board reconvened in its Chambers and proceeded with its regular agenda. MATTER OF RECORD 1 hereby certify that the for� is a true and correct)W$odal cmW entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this28thday of September , 1976 C J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By r/� • Deputy Clerk F:axine M. Fteuf d H-24 3/7615m V' :JCJM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sgptember 28 . 19 In the Matter of _ Delta Advisory Planning Council. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the Delta Action Plan — Policies and Recommendations from the Delta Advisory Planning Council is ACKNOWLEDGED. IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said plan is REFERRED to the Director of Planning, Public :storks Director, and County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Delta Advisory Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Council Supervisors Director of Planning affixed thi528thday of September lg 76 County Administrator Public Works Director County Health Officer- C-� i .-,Ft. OLSSON, Clerk County Sheriff—Coroner - + By Deputy Clerk R da Amdahl OU553 H-24 3/76 15m . .. RM I IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COMM, STATE OF CALIFORNIA September 28 1976 In the Matter of ) County Medical Care ) Eligibility Policy ) The Board on August 24, 1976 having referred to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) the matter of a report from the Director, Htm= Resources Agency on the impact of the revised medical care eligibility policy as established by Board of Supervisors Resolution 75/764 on September 29, 1975; and The Administration and Finance Committee having this day reported it met with staff from the County Administrator's office and the Human Resources Agency to review this report and the recommendations contained therein and concludes that the policy is accomplishing the goals set for it, and therefore recommends: (1) That the existing County Medical Care Eligibility Policy as originally adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 29, 1975 in Resolution 75/764 be continued through March 31, 1977. The only change which should be made to Resolution 75/764 is a technical change as follows: Under III-A, Property delete reference to Sections 50041.3 and 50043.3 of Title 22 and substitute therefor Section 50072 and Section 50073 of Title 22. These technical changes are necessitated by changes in the numbering of Title 22 regulatory sections in 1976. (2) That the Director, Humar, Resources Agency, be instructed to provide an interim report to the Board -of Supervisors following the end of October, 1976, covering the effectiveness of the policy in relation to a full year's experience with the new policy and in relation to the simplified Medi-Cal eligibility requirements which went into effect July 1, 1976. (3) That the Director, Human Resources Agency, be instructed to provide a report to the Board of Supervisors following the end of March, 1977. This report should summarize seventeen months' experience under the revised policy, together with at least eight months' experience under simplified Medi-Cal eligibility regulations and should include recommendations, if appropriate, for further revisions of the County Medical Care Eligibility Policy. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the above recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee in the matter of the County Medical Care Eligibility Policy are APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. Orig: Director, HRA _ CERTIFIED COPY County Medical Director I certify that this is a full. true & correct COPY Of County Welfare Director the original document which 1• on file in my office. CountyHealth Officer and that it was t+^r-wt nOn-w-d by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Ox;tc County. California. on County Administrator the date shown_ATTEST: J. R. of.SSON. County Clerk&exofficlo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. County Auditor-Controller eputy Clerk. ( (� Board Committee _\:Q on SEP 2 8 1976 Ronda Amdahl 00554 t — IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA September 28 1976 In the Matter of ) Offer of Clinic Space by ) Los Medanos Community Hospital ) District ) The Board on September 14, 1976 having referred to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty) the matter of an offer of clinic space by Los Medanos Community Hospital District in its Resolution Number 76-SS; and The Administration and Finance Committee having this day reported that it met with the architect for the Los Medanos Community Hospital District and staff from the Human Resources Agency and County Administrator's office as well as the County Medical Director; that the proposal advanced by the Hospital District would provide a $2,000,000 medical facility for the County on the grounds of the Los Medanos Hospital, thereby providing new facilities for the presently overcrowded Pittsburg Outpatient Clinic which is now located in a County-owned building at the Pittsburg Civic Center complex; that the advantage of this proposed facility is that it would not include the amortization of any capital expenditures since the hospital would have acquired the building through a Federal grant; and that as a result of its investigation, the Administration and Finance Committee recommends that the Board: (1) Endorse the application of the Los Medanos Community Hospital District for Federal funds from the Economic Development Administration intended to build an ambulatory clinic of approximately 30,000 square feet on the grounds of the new Los Medanos Community Hospital; (2) Indicate to the Board of Directc-s of the Los Medanos Community Hospital District the County's interest in occupying the facilities to be constructed with the Economic Development Administration grant funds, with the understanding that this is at this time an exploratory interest on the part of the County and is not to be seen as legally binding on this or any future Board of Supervisors; (3) Direct appropriate County staff to enter into discussions with staff of the Los Medanos Community Hospital and the Board of Directors of the Los Medanos Community Hospital District in an effort to develop a cooperative program which will be mutually beneficial to the County and the Hospital District. Such discussions should include, but not be limited to, the desired layout of space in the new facility, consideration as to how many staff and which programs will be included in the new facility, the terms, conditions, and costs to be considered as a charge to the County if the County occupies these facilities, the extent of cooperative relationships between the County and the Hospital District for the use of various facilities and equipment in the hospital, and the terms and conditions under which patients who are the responsibility of the County Medical Services Department can be admitted to Los Medanos Hospital and continue to be cared for by County Medical Services physicians;— - - (4) Direct that discussions around the terms of a lease with the Los Medanos Community Hospital District be understood to include reasonable charges for ongoing maintenance and operation, insurance, and other plant costs but to specifically exclude any amortization of the capital cost of acquiring the building; 00555 The Committee having further recommended that the County Administrator and the Director, Human Resources Agency keep the Board informed of progress on this subject as developments occur; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors K. N. Boggess and J. E. Moriarty)' `; in the matter of offer of clinic space by Los Medanos Community Hospital District are APPROVED. PASSED BY THE BOARD on September 28, 1976. COPY f certify that this Is a fall.true &correct copy of the original document which b on Mai In my 01111o0. and that it was tossed 1. ado"t!d by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Coata County. California.on the due shown.ATTEST: J. R OISSON. Canty Clerk&ex-offleto Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. Clark. SES 1976 Ronda Amdahl Orig: Director, HRA Board of Directors, Los Medanos Community Hospital County Medical Director Board Committee County Administrator - 2 - 00555 • • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76_ In the Matter of Annual Report of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the annual report of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for fiscal year 1975-1976 is REFERRED to the Public Works Director; PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Public I•lorks Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed thb28thday of September _ 19 76 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 1\,--�- -,� ��_ Q. Deputy Clerk Ronda Amdahl OU55"1 H-24 3/76 ISm � y �lfQ� Metr000r o tion ac !Pis Sion PAR F _ :•.., � K \ate :��,� • . R oe .��;�• �cS`.,. �^ '3 LAS- `F'� • ••c ti.Fj.. „. >' ��� Metropolitan I Tronsportotion WGommission C n Z7! r RE6 T II PART I and PAR F . b MENEM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Approving Change Order No. 8 to Contract for the New Euthanair Room and kennel Run at Martinez Animal Control Center. (1003-102-7712-602) The Board of Supervisors APPROVES, and AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director to execute, Change Order No. 8 to the construction contract with William Dahn of Pleasant Hill for the New Euthanair Room and Kennel Run at the Martinez Animal Control Center, 4849 Imhoff Drive, Martinez. The Change Order is in the amount of $1,803.38 and provides for additional excavation of unsuitable material and backfilling with rock. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Originator: P. W. Dept. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Buildings & Grounds Supervisor affixed thts�h day of September ig 76 cc: Public Works Department County Auditor-Controller Contractor p J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk N.POUS H.24 3n6!Sm 00560 i t'fff a a Fund € 1003-102-7712-601 .*reject: Martinez Animal Control - New Euthanair Room and Kennel Run Addition Contractor: William Dahn Construction In .-ccordance with County requc:t, Contractor proposes to provide all equipment, ,ucerials, labor and services to accom li::h Lite requested change to Lhe contract =+nnents for which the amount noted herein below shall constitute full compensa= :ion and by which the contract price shall he adjusted. In all other respects _be contract remains unchanged. escriprion of Chin,-e: 1. Excavation for the Euthanair Room footings revealed a "soft" spot' caused by a leaking drain line. It was necessary to remove the spot about 20' x 30' by 4' deep.and fill it with gravel to provide structural fill for the building. ($1,717.50 + 57.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$ 1,803.3$ U11 M roval c de Net Change t/ in Contract Price $1.803 q R ADD project Arc itect��gineer last contract Price $-90,•913.55 -� New Contract Price $ 92,716.93 Buildings and Grounds Engineer _ :roved: l� �^ Public Works Director �` ' 00561 / Date - contractor 7 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California 1 September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Property Assessments and Taxes. I The Board on August 31, 1976 having referred to the County Assessor and the Assessment Appeals Board a request from Mr. Horst P. Richter, 2204 Nelda 'day, Alamo, California 94507 for reimbursement of a portion of his 1975-1976 property taxes and a reduction of his 1976-1977 assessment; and The Board having received a memorandum from the County Assessor indicating that the current assessment is proper; and The Board having received a memorandum from the Chairman, Assessment Appeals Board, advising that any further appeal for reduction of the 1975-1976 tax assessment shculd be made to the Superior Court, and that Mr. Richter's proper avenue of action for reduction of the 1976-1977 assessment was to file an application with said Appeals Board. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid memoranda is ACKNOWLEDGED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit copies of same to Mr. Richter. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors cc: Mr. H. P. Richter affixed this 28 day of September . 19 76 County Assessor Assessment Appeals Board J. R. OLSSON, Clerk De Byl- .` Cf � Mildred 0.-Ballarat P"� Clerk H-24 i;'e 15m 1 { CONTP.A COSTA COUNTY covxTr J. RKO'SO;offlclO JAIACS W. GOODHUE ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD c—RK OF THr VVARO JaMI;; 0. GRAHAM KFNN 7H LAItSON AD14INISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 107 NRS. GERALOfNS RG55.L1 P.O. COX aid OTT 2� ALTT 1xATCB AND F"OI.Z I2S-7000 IMARU—OFFICCRA MARTINE-- CALIFORNIA 94553 tOWOHION salt TRON:.S C- GARRICK September 22, 1976 TO: Board of Supervisors PROM: Assessnent Appeals Board J. i:. Goodhue, Chairman SUBJECT: Board Order dated August 31, 1976 concerning letter from Mr. Horst P. Richter Regarding- your ineuirr to this Bonrd, we can reply as follows: 1. As to I-Lh� chter's 1975 tax assessmont, this matter was heard and decided before the Assessment Appeals Board. The decision is final, and any further action bg Iu'. Richter should be nada to the Superior Court. 2. As to th-o 1976 tax assessment, Air. Richter's proper avenue of action was to file an application for reduction insofar as an;; action tnat this Board has the Power to consider. X IG:dm ce: Assessor f 00563 — r Office of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ASSESSOR 834 Court Street Martinez, California 94553 September 20, 1976 TO: Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors E=RON: E. F. ldanaf<a, County :assessor RECEIVED By: ar S,. Rush,k Chief Appraiser j,1, i - 5El' 7 1 1376 Sl1t:Jf"C l' Board Order dated August 31, 1976 J_R.OLZC14 re: Letter from Mr. Horst P. Richter CLERK 8OA,13 o> Sur VISaaS EY ... DNTRA_ Our first contact with Mr. Richter was on January 22, 1975 when we received a vacant land sales questionnaire indicating a purchase price of $22,950. On (larch 11, 1975 our cost estimator entered the new residence and completed our building records. The property was appraised for $74,000 for the 1975 Assessment Roll. On August 12, 1975, we received a letter from fir. Richter requesting applica- tion forms. An Application for Reduction in Assessment, dated August 15, 1975, was received. The application claimed slide damage and inequality of assessment. On October 29, 1975. Mr. Richter's property was reviewed by Mr. Al Blake in preparation of a Board Hearing. Findings were that "slide damage" was minor erosion which had been corrected by Rose Landscaping Company for a $60 cost. Many of the "unequal" assessments claimed by fir. Richter were found to be partial assessments due to incomplete construction on lien date. November 3, 1975 - A Hearing Officer heard Mr. Richter's appeal and upheld the Assessor's value of $74,000. Mr. Richter indicated at this hearing that the contract cost of the residence was $55,000. Added to the purchase price of the land, this represents a total cost of $78,950 for the property. On November 20, 1975 Mr_ Richter wrote a letter rejecting the Hearing Officer's findings and requesting a hearing before the Appeals Board. On (•:arch 10, 1976 the Assessment Appeals Board upheld the Assessor's valuation of $74,000. Mr. Richter's property was reappraised for the 1976 lien date for $91,500, along with all other properties in the San Ramon School District. On May 23, 1976 fr. Richter contacted our office by telephone and requested a review of the new 1976 value. Oca�ta�} owl { Septelber 20, 1976 -2- Board of Supervisors { <„ -vi�apd and reduced to $85,000. til 'nnt'i al r S, A Z- U ,- Of the land, this reP4 entsI a,41L.total-of 055-uuu. Added to the purchase Cost Of $78,950 for the Property. price On November 20 1975 Mr. Richter wrote a letter rejecting the Hearing officer's findings and requesting a hearing before the Appeals B On March 00o.lo' oard. 1976 the Assessment Appeals Board upheld the Assessor's valuation S74, of Mr. Richter's property was reappraised for the 1976 lin date for $91,500 along with all other properties in the San Rarron Schools On Flay y 28. 1976 Mr. Richter contacted our Office by telephone and requested a review of the new I976 value. Board of Supervisors -2- September 20, 1976 With equalization in mind, the appraisal was reviewed and reduced to $85,000. ,Jr. Richter's property is currently appraised lower than all of the properties listed on his attachment to his letter to the Board of Supervisors. The valuation figures of surrounding properties listed on Mr. Richter's letter were those values prior to the 1976 lien date re-appraisal. These figures are no longer valid. A thorough review, adjustment, and equitable assessment has been made by the Assessor. It has previously been reviewed by an Assessment Appeals Hearing Officer and the Assessment Appeals Board. Ile feel the current assessment is proper. ER4/CSR/bhp 00516 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 , 19 76 In the Matter of Proposed Amendment to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency. The Board having received a September 15, 1976 letter from Mr. Richard J. Moore, County Counsel, County of Alameda, transmitting a copy of a proposed Second Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement establishing the Alameda-Contra Costa Health Systems Agency, and recommending adoption of same; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the amendment is REFERRED' to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for recommendation. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. i hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 28ttyay of September _ 19 76 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By L9Deputy Clerk ra H-2i3/7615m 00566 _1 v, T In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 ' 19 76 In the Matter of Pittsburg Area Preventive Drug Abuse Program. A September 17, 1976 letter having been received from The Reverend Palmer Z:atson, Chairman, Contra Costa County Mental Health Advisory Board, advising that said Board endorses the recommendation of the Drug Abuse Board that sponsorship of the Pittsburg Area Preventive Drug Abuse Program funded by Short- Doyle 714 monies) be shifted from Los Medanos Hospital to the City of Pittsburg; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that this matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency, for report. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Superv�Ors on the date oforesoid. cc: Rev. Palmer Watson Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director, Human Supervisors Resources Agency affixed this 28t1day of September . 19 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Cleric By j 1.!:,,J G�J' . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 0056`"l H-24 3/76 15m In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 28 lq 76 In the Matter of Inquiry with Respect to Compliance with County Ordinance and Buildinq Codes. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having called attention to a September 23, 1976 letter he had received from Mr. Robert Ferrero, 53 Tappan Lane, Orinda, Cllifornia 94563 with respect to construc- tion of a retaining wall adjacent to his property, and inquiring if all County Ordinance and Building Codes have been complied with; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director of Planning and the Director of Building Inspection. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. ! hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Mr. R. Ferrero Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 28tid September , 76 Director of Building ay of p • 19 _ Inspection County Administrator , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 44l�r(i i_ E.iI . t, _, i7eputy Clerk Rdbbie BWtierre H-24 3176 ISm 00568 ■ _ `^4Hb1 , I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r Septc.rIer ?.P , 1976 In the Matter of Proposed Sign Ordinance for cornlunities of Alatvo, Danville and San Ramon. The Board on Narch 16, 1975 having referred to tho Director of Planning for preparation an appropriate sign ordinance for the co=uuitics of Alamo, Danville and San Ramon; and The Board having received a September 22, 1976 memorandum from '.Sr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, transmitting a proposed sign ordinance drafted by the Commercial Development Committee of the San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce in conjunction vita Planning Department staff and recommending that said proposed ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission for hearings thereon; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Director of Planning is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 28, 1976. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Director of Planning Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 28tbday of_ September , 19 76 San Ramon Valley Chamber of Commerce Valley Action Porus J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By __ i, kcT Do" Clerk Rob ie C9ierre� 005;6�' H-24 3/7615m Now M And the Board adjourns to meet on �� Sl /974 at 9=00 hm , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California. Vt4l.A-A J. P. K nny_, chai xman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CLERK Deputy 015'70 s i' SU?GwARY OF F?OCEE T_l:GS BEFORE THE BOAP.D OF SUPrPVISOPS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 28, 1976, PREPARED BY J. R. OLSSCN, COU11':Y CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD. Approved personnel action for Civil Service. Aptroved appropriation adjustment for Medical Services; and internal adjustment not affecting total for Human Resources Agency. Appointed S. McCoy to fifth step of Intermediate Typist Clerk-Project in the Health Dept. Authorized increase in revolving fund of Marshal, Richmond Judicial District. Authorized Director, Furan Resources Agency, to execute fee-for-service contract with R. Greenwald, N.D. Authorized Auditor to initiate legal action against B. Cooper and G. Price to recover cost owed the County. Appointed T. mosca to Contra Costa County Community Development Advisory Council as representative of Supervisorial District V. Acknowledged receipt of Delta Action Plan - Policies and P.ecoeumendations and referred same to Director of Plannings Public Works Director and Cou-n-ty-Tagrn-istrator. Authorized Auditor to pay cost of utility services for Concerted Services Project, Inc., through Dec. 31, 1976. Authorized Auditor to advance funds for operation of Economic Opportunity Program. Denied claims filed by R. Davis, R. Van Roman, P. Loville, R. Dutton, et ux; and &-tended claim filed by D. Stewart. Exercised option to extend lease with Duffel Financial and Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners for premises at 2401-D Stanwell Drive, Concord, occupied by Raman Resources Agency, Manpower Project. , Authorized representatives of Public Works, Sheriff's Office, and Detention Facility Advisory Committee to travel to San Diego, CA; Chicago, IL; Kane County, IL; St. Louis, MO; and Boulder, CO to inspect detention facilities, Oct. 5-8. As ex officio the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, fixed Nov. 2 at 11 a.m. to receive bids for performance of weed abatement services in said district. Adopted the following ordinances: 76-70 re sick leave accrual for employees of EI Sobrante, Noraga, Orinda and Riverview ?ire Protection Districts to become operative on Nov. 1; 76-71 re calculating length-of-service credits; 76-72 re pkv differentials for certain employees; and 76-69 rezoning certain land in the Bethel Island area (1832-RZ). Authorized C. Adams, Juvenile Justice Commission, to attend Constitutional Rights Foundation Seminar, South Lake Tahoe, CA, Sept. 27-29; E. Wanaka, County Assessor, to attend International Association of Assessing Officers Conference on assessment Adminis- tration, Atlanta, GA, Oct. 17-20; and D. Dillon, Sheriff's Office, to attend Pourth National Symposium on Crime Laboratory Development, Quantico, VA, Oct. 11-15. Authorized Auditor to decrease apDropriatiors of 1976-77 budgets for certain County fire protection districts to resin within maximum 'legal tax levy. Adopted Traffic Resolution No. 2252. Accepted quitclaim deed fror F. and C. Martin which eliminates title encumbrance of Right of Way, North Richmond Bypass. '��►5"11 se September 28, 1976 Su_nary, continued Page 2 Accepted Offers of Dedication for recording only in connection with B4164-76, MS 37-76, MS 25-75, BSS 33-76, MS 65-76, iwj 34-75. Accepted Grant Deeds for Rd. NO. 5301, PS 46-76, MS 67-74 and Sub. 4701; Consent to Deeding for IS 46-76; Relinquishment of Abutter's Rights for MS 46-76, Sub. 4701; Consent to Offer of Dedication for MS 67-74; and Consent to Dedication for MS 11-76 and MS 65-76. Awarded contract for workshop transportation services to Martinez Bus Lines, Inc.; and determined that Public Works Dept. take leadership role in review of several trans- portation services. Approved recommendations of Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Boggess and Poriarty) re U. S. Dept. of Health, Education rnd Welfare denial of grant application for comprehensive human services delivery system for PY 1976-77 and request of Assemblyman D. Boatwright that Revenue Sharing funds be allocated to Blue Devils Drum and Bugle Corps for purchase of new uniforms. Approved recommendation of County Counsel with respect to requests for legal defense from Sheriff-Coroner, Auditor-Controller, and Treasurer-Tax Collector. Authorized Chairman to execute the following: Revised Grant Application to U. S. Dept. of Labor for CETA Title I funding for Pr 1976-77; Grant Signature Sheet for Modification No. 609 of CETA Title I Grant with U. S. Dept. of Labor; Modification No. 605 to CETA Title VI grant with U. S. Dept. of Labor; Contract with N. Pink, Ph.D., for psychological evaluation of probation referrals; Community Development Block Grant Program Project Agreement No. 37 with City of Clayton and Nos. 32 and 33 with Ambrose Recreation and Park District for FY 19T6-7T; Grant Application for 1977 Head Start Program; Contract with Rubicon, Inc., for community workshops in child abuse and neglect prevention; Contract with State Dept. of Health for funding Community Demonstration Fat Control Program in Richmond; Agreement with AEP Associates for consulting services to prepare environmental impact report for Sub. 4881, Orinda area; Consultant Contract with M. Diaz to serve as Parent Assistant to Head Start Speech Pathologist; Termination of Reimbursement Agreement taken to guarantee repayment of services rendered to D. Heath; Lease with Neighborhood House of North Richmond, Inc., for premises at 305 Chesley Ave., Richmond, for continued occupancy by Health Dept.; Contract extension with J. Austin for evaluation of Adult Intervention-Diversion Project; Lease with Rubicon, Inc., for use of premises at 169 - 6th Street, Richmond, by Social Service Dept.; Grant Action for submission to Community Services Administration for conduct of Summer Youth Recreation Program; Contract with W. Bogart, M.D., for autopsy-surgeon services; As ex officio the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement with the District for construction of proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain. Authorized distribution of flyer with FY 1976-77 tax bills to provide information re distribution of property tax monies. Authorised Chairman to execute County-State Holdover Agreement No. 27 for proposed Federal-Aid Secondary project on Marsh Creek Road Bridge, Brentwood area. Authorized Public Works Director to apply for and execute Encroachment Permit from City of Walnut Creek to construct portions of proposed Walnut Boulevard Storm Drain within City-owned right of way. As ex officio the Governing Boar of Five:riew Fire Protection District, referred to Fire Chief for report Oct. 5 bids rece_•.e! .~,r performance of weed abatement services In said district. 00572 September 29, 1976 Surma.-y, continued Page 3 Adopted Ordinance No. 76-73 allowing bingo games in.unincorporated areas of the County. Approved recc=endations of Public Works Director with respect to proposed abandon- ment of San Ranon railroad branch line of Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Adopted the follow-ng numbered resolutions: 76/8116 through 76/851, authorizing changes in the assessment roll; 76/852, authorizing Public 8orks Director to execute Statement of Acceptance of Grant Offer of United States through Federal Aviation Administration for acquisition of 3unway 1cR Clear Zone Land for Buchanan Pield Airport, Concord; 76/853, approving proposed abandonment of dedicated roadway in MS 252-72, Alhambra Valley area; 76/854, accept!=, as complete improvements in Sub. 4508, Lafayette area, and accepting certain roads as County roads; 76/855, accepting as coriplete contract with L & L Equipment Co. for reconstruction and widening of pavement and improvement of roadside drainage on Crow Canyon Road; 76/856, accepting as complete improvements in Sub. 4410, Danville area, and accepting certain roads as County roads; 76/857, fixing Oct. 26 at 11 a.m. to receive bids for County Finance Building Air Conditioning Remodel, Martinez; 76/858, amending ?les. 76/638 establishing rates to be paid to child care institutions; 76/859, approving Federal-aid Secondary Highway System; 76/860, awarding contract to Riley Striping Service for installation of reflective pavement markers in Assessrent District 1973-3, San Ramon; 76/861, as ex officio the Governing Board of Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, accepting as complete contract with Enterprise Roofing Service for re-roofing of Fire Station No. 11, Clayton. Approved request of P. v!lhelm (2023-PZ) to rezone certain land in the Danville area to Single Family Residential District-15 (R-15); valved reading and fixed Oct. 12 for adoption of Ordinance No. 76-74 giving effect to said rezoning. Au hl,orized extension o: time in w:^_ieh to file final map of Sub. 4307, Byron area. Accepted donation of 59.503 frcm Hl"Itcp Center Parents Group :or architect's fees for design of therapeutic s rysra pool :o be constructed at George taller Jr. Femorial - .'est. Authorized Public Works Director to refund cash deposit as sure+-/ to the following. Envar-Lafayette Cocpa_^y, Sub. 4220, 'Valnut Creek area; Singer Housing Company, Sub. 3313. Town of Moraga; Discovery Bay Co:-)oration, Discovery Bay Blvd., Byron area; Bclla Development. Sub. 4561, Alamo area; and ?.aycond Vall and Associates, MS 154-71, Brentwood area. Referred to Employee Relations Officer for verification of required information request for recoag ition :rom the Hospital and Institutional Workers' Union, Local 250 of the Service B=ployees international union. Approved sumret, tax bonds for the following subdivisions: 4674 and 4834, City of Concord; 4340, Town of M.oraga; and 46E8, City of Antioch. Referred to Administration and Finance Committee resolution received from Alameda County Board of Supervisors re property tax relief and reform. Accepted report of Public Works Director with respect to extension of E1 Cerro Blvd., Danville area. Rescinded Resolution 'No. 75/412, su=r'?y aban3;ping portions of *forth Gate Road, "elnut Creek area. Referred to Director of Plaice letter from C. -lilson suggesting provision for one or two =bile hone rants —'- area between ''.aL=tCreek ad San Ramon; and a copy o: the proposed State Fa. i.-arker ?rousing Assistance Flan and. an invitation for partici- pation 's. =blic hearings on same. :eceired from the State Department of P.ousing and Cot.-u=ity Jevelo=ent and t,.he Cal'!or::a Advisor/ Co—Ittee or, Fa_-^rxorker Housing and Co=muniry Zevelor rent. 011573 k.. .. September a, 176 Suaary, conn=ed Page 4 Referred to Director of planning and Director of BuLlding Inspection -z:uiry _roc R. Ferrero re ordinance and building codes in connection with construction of a retain- ing wall adjacent to his property. Referred to Directcr, Human Resources Agency, letter from Mental Health Advisory Board advising of its endorsement of the reco=endatioa of the Drug Abuse Board that sponsorship of tae Pittsburg Area Preventive Drug .abuse Program be shifted fro= Los Nedenos Rospi`,.al to the City of Pittsburg; and letter from, County Counsel, Count? of Alameda, zrarsritting copy of proposed Second A=end=ent to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement establishing the Alameda-Cost-a Costa wealth Syste=s Agency. Approved recommendation of Director of Planning that proposed sign ordinance for the com unities of Alamo, Danville and San Ra:zon be referred to the Planning Commission for hearings. Ackaovledged receipt of memoranda fro= the County Assessor and the Assessment Appeals Board concerning a request from E. Richter for reimbursement of a portion o. Us 1575-76 prope-ty taxes and a reduction of his 1976-77 assessment. Authorized Public Wo:%s Director to execute Deferred Improvement Agreement with T. Cutin et al for Sub. MS 34-76, Oakley area. and Change Order 2:o. 8 to construction contract with W. Da" for the :New Eutha:air Room and Kennel Run at Martinez Aa4mal Control Center. Referred to the Public 'corks Director bids.received for the 1976 Pavement Marker u Ru=ble Strip Protect, various areas; and the annual report of the Yetropolitan Trans- portation Commission for FY 1975-76. A_proved recommendations of d=inistraticn and F:.nance Committee with respect to offer of clinic space by Los Sedans Co,-=unity Hospital District and continuation of the County Ned.ical Care E ig=bility Fo!Lcy through Par. 31, 1977. Authorized Public ::orks Director to execute Consulting Services Agreements with Sant1na and Thompson Consulting Ci7il Engineers. Inc., and with Leptien-CronLn-Cooper, Inc. for the proposed Rolling-wood, Rodeo, Crockett and Sl Sebrante and the Shore Acres, Clyde and gest Pittsburg I=;.rave_-eat Frojects, respectively. Approved Addendum r'o. 1 to plans and provisions for Treat Boulevard/::illow Pass Road Redian Landscaping project, ieiuested Count, Pip-ming Z;epa.-t=ent to consider proposal that a subdivisio* ordinance for _chile homes be enacted. aefe.-red to Government Operations Co=_ittee (Supervisors A. F. Dias and A. Tinscheid) and County Counsel a memorandum from the Director of Planning citing determinations rade by the Planaimg Commission with respect to park dedication require- ments for Subs. 4670 and 4824, Walnut Creek area. Closed hearing and fixed Oct. 12 at 11:15 a.m. as time for decision on request of E. Biggs (1997-RZ) to rezone land in the 3 Sobrante area. P.eferred to Director, -cyan Resources Agency, letter reco=ending termination of contract with the 2o^-1, Preschool for Disturbed Children ana retention of the therapeutic nursery school component of same. Adopted rec=endaticas of the 'Public 10-ks Director that the Board acknowledge receipt of the Facility Sciences Corporation's report on Bed Capacity and Location of the proposed new County Detention Center, adopt the Civic Center location for sane in concis.-rence with the Detention Fae{11ty Advisory Committee, and adopt a detention facility bed capacity range of 370 - 393 beds, exclusive of medical and holding areas. Recessed :nto Zxecutire Session to consult with representatives in connection with discussions of salary natters and to discuss a litigation matter with County Counsel. Authorized County Treasu--e::ax Collector to solicit bids from various __4naacial institutions for te;pora-y bo.^-yi^.a of 00574 -" t. THE PRECEDING DocMIENTS CONSIST OF 574 PAGES.