The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 09021975 - R 75G IN 5 1975 SEPTEM i TUEsDAY i t i i { i i i V l THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MIST IN ALL ITS CAPACITIES PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 24-2.402 IN REGULAR SESSION AT ,9:00 A.M. , TUESDAY, SEPTM4M 20 1975 IN ROOM 107, COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA. PRESENT: Chairman W. N. Boggess, presiding; Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. CLERK: J. R. Olason, represented by Geraldine Russell,. Deputy Clark. The following are the calendars for Board consideration prepared by the Clerk, County Administrator and Public Works Director. JAMES P.KENNY.RICHMOND CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS WARREN N.BOGGESS 1ST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M.OMS,SAN PAULO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ,VICE CHMAN KENNY IND DISTRICT AR JAMES E. MORIARTY.LAFArETTt JAMES R.OLSSON,COUNTY CLERK 3RD DISTRICT AND FOR AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.BOGGESS.CONCORD SPECIAL DISTRICTS GOVERNED BY THE BOARD MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL •TH DISTRICT CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID. PITTstURG BOARD CHAMBERS. ROOM 107.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 3TH DISTRICT P.O. BOX 911 - MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 We Have A New Tele�Honq rqumb:!r 372-2371 TUESDAY SEPTE1-5ER 2, 1975 The Board will r:.eet in all its can_ acities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402. 9:00 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the Public t:orks Director. 9:00 A.M. Consider recommendations of the County Administrator. 9:15 A.M. Consider "Items Submitted to the Board." 9:15 A.M. Consider recommendations and requests of Board members. 9:30 A.M. Consider recor..mendations of Board Committees including Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. ?Moriarty) on the following: a. Request that the Ordinance Code be amended to allow transfer of cardroom licenses (deferred from August 5, 1975) ; and b. Retention/dissolution of active and inactive committees, commissions and advisory boards (deferred from August 5, 1975) . 9:45 A.M. Executive Session. 11:00 A.M. Representative of International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1230, will make presentation on the position of said organization concerning compensation negotiations. 11:15 A.M. Hearin.;s on planning matters (see attached agenda) . ITEMS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD Items 1 ---9 : CO11SENT 1. APPROVE minutes of proceedings for the month of August, 1975. 2. DECLARE certain ordinances duly published. 3. DENY the following claims: a. Dennis E. Barnette, $21,042.42 for general damages; and b. Application for leave to present late claim of Jimmie Lee Haley, $100,000 for personal injuries. 4. AUTHORIZE provision of legal defense for T. L. Lambert, Deputy Sheriff, in connection with Superior Court Action No. 155517; J. R. Wallis, Deputy Sheriff, in connection with Superior Court Action No. 152927; and personnel and former personnel of the Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner in connection with Superior Court Action No. 151656. 5. FIX September 15, 1975 at 11:50 a.m. for hearing on the -recom- mendation of the ?lanning Commission with respect to Floise Element of the County General Plan. r -77T ,,,, Board of Supervisors ' Calendar, continued September 2, 1-075 G. ACKNO0 ;LEDGE receipt of report of the Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to :animals. 7. ADOPT Ordinance No. 75-37 (introduced August 25, 1975) rezoning land located in the Danville area to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20) zoning classification; C•. David and S. Adrienne i,ailes, applicants (1933-RZ) ; waive reading and order publication. 9. APPRB�ffi soreby tam bend-Per-Sttb''sazTs:�'rass--l;759 jeieted �r-'`rsnirr- the 91%y ilipite eg Genear . Items 10 - 17: DETERMINATION (Staff recommendation shown following the item. ) 10. LETTER 'from Mr. Fabian Richart complaining that planning matters are being delayed pending receipt of the recommendations of the committee established by the Board to aid in review of the County General Plan as it applies to the eastern portion of the county. CONSIDER AND/OR REFER TO BOARD COMf1ITTEE FOR REVIEW 11. COM14UNICATIONS from Supervisor Jack Walsh, County of San Diego, and Mr. R. Watson, Executive Director, County Supervisors Association of California, urging the Board to oppose Senate Bill 599 which would remove the local option of including the county jail within a department of corrections and require that jails be the exclusive jurisdiction of the sheriff. CONSIDER ACTION TO BE TAKEN 12. LETTER from Deputy District Director, State Department of Transportation, enclosing resolution rescinding previously adopted freeway locations on Routes 93 and 77 in Contra Costa County (Orinda-Lafayette area) , and advising that disposal of acquired rights of way in connection therewith is being deferred until July 1, 1976. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 13. PETITIONS from Alamo residents expressing opposition to proposed Assessment District 1975-5 (Entrada Verde Improvements) , and requesting that certain properties be excluded from said district. REFER TO PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 14. MEMORANDUM from Chairman, Delta Advisory Planning Council, enclosing the Council's proposed budget for the 1975-1976 fiscal year and requesting Board approval of same. REFER TO COUNTY AD`•IINISTRATOR 15, LETTER from Chief, Children and Youth Unit, Family Health Services Section, State Department of Health, advising that an optional reimbursement procedure of the Child Health and Disability Prevention Program provides start-up funds for health screening personnel -_Z61aries for a four-month period in fiscal year 1975-1976, and that to utilize said pro- cedure, a budget addendum must be submitted by September 15, 1975. REFER TO DIRECTOR, HUMAN RESOURCES AGENCY 16. LETTER from Presiding Judge of the Superior Court expressing the opinion that the proposed county jail should be constructed at its presently planned location, that the criminal courts and jail should be in one building adjacent to the present courthouse, that it should contain a combination of single and nultiple cells , and that construction of said facility should commence without further delay. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT r, Y 0 Board of Supervisors' Calendar, continued September 2, 1975 17. CONSIDER memorandums of understanding, if any, submitted on behalf of the Employee Relations Officer. Items 18 - 23: INFORMATION (Copies of communications. listed as information items have been furnished to all interested parties. ) 18. LETTER from Senator J. A. Nejedly advising that he will request that Senate Bill 632 not be acted on and that said measure will be broadened at a later time to include other detention design and operation features; and LETTER from Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Tehama County, addressed to Senator J. A. Nejedly, thanking the Senator for meeting with the Board to discuss SB 632, and advising that withdrawal of said bill will permit construction of the Tehama County Jail to proceed on schedule. 19• . LETTER from Senator J. A. Nejedly advising that the Assembly Committee on Education has granted a one-year extension with respect to sale of the Contra Costa College site in Concord. 20. LETTER from Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, Plumas County, transmitting copies of resolutions adopted by said Board opposing the Food Stamp Outreach Program, and instructions applicable thereto, and stating that it does not intend to further implement county food stamp sales by providing another method of food stamp issuance as provided in AB 134. 21. LETTER from Manager, California Central Valleys Flood Control Association, advising that proposed legislation (SB 111) will provide needed funds for the delta levee maintenance program and expressing concern with respect to the tone of a letter from the Delta Advisory Planning Council purportedly supporting said bill. 22. LETTER from Ms. Margi Stern, Concord, protesting construction of the-new County Jail. 23. NOTICE from State Department of Health of public hearing to be held September 23, 1975 on proposed changes with respect to various regulations in Title 17 of the California Administrative Code. Persons addressin!; the Board should complete the form provided on the rostrum and furnish the Clerk with a written copy of their presentation. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5 P.M. 2 .S,ept(mber la f a - 'lueswW „ c . T•J1\. .r.. trRT... r/ .n+AnT.'7 . IC TV% �.a:lu .ul. a�1w.b> >y. �•..,'--v �.L..a►wNJ. tu.✓. � ILAN Wil M-11tI:EUILY (4plicant) - JiLQ.T S. NEILL (Owner) - 1957-1& lb rezone 6 acres (more or less) from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Resid-mtial District-40 (R-40); property fronting approx., 4W-ft., on the east side of El Pintado Road, generally opposite Spring Lane: Fast Alamo Area. (GT--3462) . STidY RMUDS MION: Approve. C MISSION REOMWEIM ON: Approve. 11:%0 A.M. - 212MING: PEHUC HEARIIG: (S.D. V) ODLUAN & ISALSW (Applicant) - am J ((lamer) - 1.954-RZ Zb rezone 2.7d (more or less) acres from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District W (R-20); property located westerly of the intersection of Ua,Len Oaks Drive and Hagen Uaks Court, southerly of Stone Valley Road: Alamo Area. (Cr-3461) bTAW RUUO►+ TI(W Approve. CCSSI(M Approve. 11:25 A.M. - RELlk1TIi1Zi: P[8UC HEARING: (S.D.V) SC1m,L & uAmu, INC. (Applicant) - M.C. OMNETr (Omer) - 1912-RZ To rezone 7.2 acres from Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40) to Single Family Residential District-2L) (R-2U); property fronting approxi- mately pproximately UW-ft., on the southerly side of huss Road and Clipper Hill Road, being I -ft., westerly of ilradford Place: West Danville Area. (GT-3452) STAFF Rv00s£ 'lZt7l+i: Approve. tlWION lMX7L0�4i1IDA1T�T: Approve. 11:30 A.M. - RmONIM: PLMLIC lir: (S.D. V) VAULT VIM COMPANY (Applicant & Owner) - 3:456-RZ 1b rezone 23 acres from Single family Residential District-12 (R-12) to Single Family Residential District-1A (R-40); property fronting approx., 1,30U-ft., on the soutbmst side of Castle flock Road, approx., 4W-ft., south of Pine (reek Road: Walnut Crede Area.. (Cr-3383) STAFF hU . .► TIQV: drove. ClnTSSIt lTi lea lab N: Approve. 11;35 A.M. - WrISICU: APPEAL: SU NISICN: (S.D. III) b1T3DIVISIW 0471d: (Uumer: Raymond O'Neal) A proposed subdivision of 7 lots on 6.2 acres in an Rr420 Zoning District. A variance is requested to have 3 lots less than 129 ft., in average lot width. Subject land has W9-ft., of frontage on the east side of Reliez Valley loud: Reliez Valley Area. (CT-3470) 5'TAFI' 1t17UOLfl�:i�IATI(kti; Approve with conditions. C0s1DIIS,ICl1i 11iJO0AG4:►'1UWON: approve with conditions. V�AAIrI ........... OFF_Ct i` H—F CO i COST_:� COUNTY Bla i l d.in a?__o__^.3a o: Board of Superv:so_s Subject: Reco=en ed r•=r_cns, Sea;.e er 2, x1975 From: rr_:zur G. will, Co•ur_ty 7 d=iris.razo_ I. P-E SOtiNEL _ACTIONS 1. Reclassification of positions as follows: _ . Cost Deuartment Center From To Agriculture 366 Rennelman (all Animal Control positions) Center Attendant District 242 District Attorney District Attorney Attorney Investigator Inspector District 242 District Attorney District Attorney Attorney Insnector I (all Senior Inspector positions) District Attorney District Attorney Investigator II Supervising (all positions) Inspector Public Works 079 Associate Archi- Buildings and tectural Engineer Grounds Engineer Public works 061 Assistant Archi- Associate Archi- tectural Engineer tectural Engineer Human 180 Social Program Executive Assistant 'Resources - Planner I to Mental Health Agency Advisory Board Medical 540 Account Clerk IT Account Clerk III Services v 00061 Pa__ 2. -PP.SOS i ACTIONIS 2. Add `_cns and cancellations of post tz2ons as. foll oris:. COSI - -+?�t Can--e=, >�ai.� �.''. C a'^a2i22-at on Saeri== 255 -- Typist Clerk Sher.i + 256 Sher=_.'s -- Dis:a_diner 3. Establishment or. Deletion of classifications;as Lollows.. Cost Department Center Delete Add Civil Sez-vice 035 -- Office Manager' ($1058-2286} Office Manager II ($1207-1467) II. TRAVEL REQUESTS 4. Dame and Destination Denar -sent and Date Meeting Helaine G. Gann, Houston, Texas Nationale Head Stare. OEO 9/21/75 .to 9/24/75 Handicap Conference (Federal funds) Marie E. Poe, Houston, Texas rational Head Start OEO 9/21/75 to 9/24/75 Handicap Conference. (Federal funds)- 111. APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTS None. IV. LIENS AND COLLECTIONS - 5.. Authorize write-off of delinquent accounts receivable in the amount of $270.96 =s recommended by the Office of County Auditor-Controller and the County .Health Department. _, t.4X. ilia l ' Rer Pale. 3. V. BOARD TitiID C n PLAZZ?MVIVIOMMES L. Home and/or Effective Department Institution Rate Date •,nra.t Chamberlain's Child=--en 61,100 9/3/75 Resources Cent-ex, San 3,a=rin, Agencr California %Y1. CDNITRNCTS :-?CD GMANITS 7. Approze and authorize Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute agreements between County and agencies as follows: Agency Purpose Amount Period Contra Costa Promote economic $155,000 9/1/75 County development and to Development support Bicentennial 8/31/.76 Association- Program IB.�►S Improve tele- $1,416/year Effective processing systems 8/15/75- - capability /15/75 .capability State of Amendments to Work No change 8/31/75- California /31/75California Experience (Extension to Employment Agreements agreement). 11/30/75. Development Department : Byron Sewage treatment $340/year Effective Sanitary services-Byron 7/1/75 District Boys Ranch County Comprehensive $56,207 7/15/7.5 Superintendent Alcohol Education (Short Doyle to of Schools and Training funds) 6/30/76 City of Probation Depart- $600 (to 8/4/75 Rich-word m=nt delegate County) to agreement for 9/30/75 certain services to disadvantaged youth :z x. £ a 'syh us O;t",, .' : 0. v kt� , �: x x ��! / l ' ^$k'�4^s` a , T I,. h r IRMN C rya .. ,a $ +-DaYOi e CO21tLaCL5 ane �Ltho!'ize D1reCto�.,, $u1TcaP r _ �Y resources .cehcy, to execute' agreement, corms for .11 :fir ; rl x zm me?1`ca� ser�tlr es to-.be DrOVldetl by GErtaln tet s Or ' _,� ��C%!cc ,.�_.�T53�._=:?S irJ� SOLI'�_i' TRed1G�I �ary ce -- i�x-s Z�T�1 TEGIS_T��?'ION ` ,, r t � s _ - - S c. ,Z None x W . 1. r s Z ux N UIII..R�AT ESTA'T'E ACTIONSI. f , ? - 11 ,, n amu. ,; _ 9 Authorize,77.777 the Chairman, Board of :Supervisors, 'nto -h �- 11 , execute ,a .monthly rental agreement with Duffel -$ � ; Financial & 'Construction Company `'and1. Buchanan4 Oaks �; Partners for premzsAs at 2401 Stanwell bDrve, Su1te 120x,, � k ll Concord;, for use by the Social Service Department `ll f f 4 i iia' t'ix 3i y Y i� 10 Exercise obtiI..on to extend xollow ng leases `{ _ .- Agency Department` Purpose tiers od .k�� x h Ne�ghborhoodti Health Rodent Control r 9/1/75 r House,• Inc. Program . ir' U 8/31/76 £`f r .14 I Oil, Chemical Medical Mental Health{Clinic h9/1/75s ` and ;Atomic Services to'_,T' . Workers. - 8/3I4/,�7r6 x - `� . x rw. IX OTHER .ACT30NS . i f , i S. k -. s} ff p lI ._:Fix 'tax:_rates and levy 'property taxes t .11 o finance the; j _A~ 1. County Budget adopted on August 27, 1975 enc--for t j ,� xs adopted ;district' budgets as 'calculated by the Countyf _ , , A7_7 e en C de ' ud for Controll, pursuant to Gov rnm t o, ,� ,_ s �� rl% Secfion .29100 et' seq`. ,f Y` �, . 12 Authorise the ChI. airmall,n, Board of Superviso,fzrs, to" sus I 11 execute ,an'.applcatxon to the U S , Department♦ ofr py J��iV, �`" Conrterc' aril Tabor for epnroxlmately ,5500,000x�n x11, Federal .funding=.:to provide a Job Opportunities Program `y _ author zen .,b '. Title X o�. the'`Public works,rand Economic h} k� Development AGt: or 1965, as amended. xy ` { ` t LL + , '`'. ^y2,tom- S ( , SnSe(4yy kms. Y .* L i.t t' tt�vy's.I h: fyN, yt .may } tur.l`` r is-.�(- T'S r cfizs ( i z, -., r y� E F stn 1,�- , "m W." 1W.1,17 - A ��.7y„iS•Y 1}k : ryr'x;'.w"1 '� .. - e`7 ..y Ld L-F-•sMyr} `e t - i ,, .Yy i"`y 6* "S7 y ' .°�' L . "F..;'�i "�`N..�».:Y��r`•i,.-�..e� }� tis. -.,!'.- "':.. s .^ Y.;'s"'..r,.,..�,_ •': r.. o.,,.u.-.a�` �,r..:: � '✓:�r3., _na. K.sr,.7 t..e.:,.., c...?.,�t�.�r��4 iYe�?" 7s, ..sem. !1 i 0-: sz—arvisnV-s 1_3. Acknoizle ge receipr of memorandum report from tze County y::r.inistrator showing use ofpzrk dedication. .funds. �� v _nom i + memorandum _ -•_- =•�••• o c►: �;_ecg_ e_a er a epi.-_ ��_ County Administrator concerning she Vie- amese Refugee Program. 15. Adopt resolution providing compensation adjustments for certain management classifications, taking into account those negotiated by employee organizations. 16. Adopt order continuing in effect until September 30, 1975 the provisions of agreements for professional services contracts for physicians working for the Countv. 17. On the recommendation of the County Auditor-Controller and the County Sheriff-Coroner, amend the schedule of itemized fees provided by the County Sheriff- Coroner for documents and photographic services effective September 1, 1975, and cancel the Board resolution setting said fee schedule adopted by the Board on May 31, 1961. 18. Authorize refund of park dedication fee in the amount of $695 to Mrs. Ferrell England, 5733 Olinda Road, - E1 Sobrante, California, pursuant to Section 920-12_012 of the County Ordinance Code, as recommended by the Director of Planning. 19. Authorize the Chairman, Board of Supervisors, to execute a grant application to be submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (project cost $150,000) to perform a countywide emergency communications system as recom- mended by the Emergency Telephone System (9-1-1) Planning Committee. 20. Establish the Contra Costa Countv Advisory Council on Aging, and appoint members thereto pursuant to the Older Americans Act and recommendation of the Human Resources Director; terminate the Executive Committee on Aging and the Council on Aging, which said Council replaces. OM01 -- niM �E , i 41 A Chairman to ask moo= any comments byinterested cit-i--ens in atzendance at the meeting subject am Dartcu .a= item to a -_-- snac =ied -ir if dr.scuss on. at, ci wiz?ns' becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration. o= atter calendar items. DEADLINE FOR AGENDA ITEMS: WEDNESDAY, 5:00 P.M. { CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Martinez, California September 2, 1975 AGENDA REPORTS Report A. LANDSCAPING - SAN RAYON AND GREEN VALLEY CREEKS - AWARD CONTRACT - Danville Area The Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the governing body of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, on August 19, 1975, referred to the Public Works Director the bids received for the Landscaping Unit #1 Project in Flood Control Zone 3B. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors award the contract to Valley Crest, Inc. , 1460 Concord Avenue, Concord_ , California, whose bid of $39,817.00 was the lowest of nine bids received. The project is financed entirely from Flood Control Zone 3B funds. (RE: Project No. 8515-75, Work Order 8515, Flood Control Zone No. 3B) (FCD) Report B. PINE VALLEY ROAD - San Ramon Area - On July 28, 1975, the Board of Supervisors referred a July 15, 1975 letter from the San Ramon Homeowners Association to the Public Works Department for report. The letter urged the completion of Tareyton Avenue, Davona Drive and Broadmoor Drive through to Montevideo Drive, and requested that the Public Works Department study the need for the completion and the possibility of using an Assessment District to con- struct the missing segments. The letter from the Homeowners Association adequately ex- plains the current traffic situation and the necessity for additional access. There are presently about 1,000 homes and a high school which must use the Pine Valley Road freeway undercrossing or Tareyton Avenue to the south as access, and the latter is a long, circuitous route through several sub- divisions. New subdivisions will provide five additional access roads. However, these subdivisions have been held up due to unavail- ability of adequate sewer service. A new sewer pumping station is now being constructed and will provide the necessary service in the near future. The letter from the Homeowners Association also inquires as to whether an Assessment District could be formed to construct the missing links. While an Assessment District could be formed, the law related to assessment districts specifies . that the cost be spread to the benefiting owners. This would involve not only the subdividers, but several hundred homeowners and the school district. Such an approach would be very timo-co..^.su-ming. (Continued on ne:_t page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 1 of 8 September 2, 1975 00012` t0Ul Report B Continued: For these reasons an Assessment District seems impractical and unnecessary in light of the imminent subdivision development. (NOTE TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please send a copy of this' report to the San Ramon Homeowners Association, P. 0. Box 54, San Ramon, CA 94583. - (LD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT I Item 1. WILDCAT CREEK - AUTHORIZE DRAINAGE WORK - North Richmond Area It is recommended that the Boaid of Supervisors, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorize the Public Works Director to remove about 1,800 cubic yards of silt from Wildcat Creek from approximately 1,000 feet below Central Street to the Southern Pacific Railroad crossing. The work will be performed by a combination of 'County forces and hired equipment at an estimated cost of $20,000. Funds will be provided by Flood Control Zone 7. This work is a Class 1 Categorical exemption from Environ- mental Impact Report requirements. (Work Order 8077, Flood Control Zone No. 7) (M) - _ SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICTS I AND II Item 2. SLURRY SEAL - 1975 (PHASE 1)- ACCEPT CONTRACT - East Richmond Heights and Tara Hills Areas The wcirk performed under the contract for the first phase of the 1975 Slurry Seal Project in the East Richmond Heights and Tara Hills areas was completed by the Contractor, Ted R. Jenkins of Long Beach, on August 14, 1975, in conformance with the approved plans, special provisions and standard specifications at a contract cost of approximately $46,000.00. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the work as complete as of August 14, 1975. The work was completed within the allotted contract time limit. It is further recommended that a four-day extension of contract time be granted due to a delay beyond the control of the Contractor. (RE: Wort: Order 4948) (C) } t f A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 2 of 8 September 2, 1970013 &a_JP..#:.uLUCJ_ �00013 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT II Item 3. AVENIDA MhRTINEZ SLIDE REPAIR - APPROVE PLANS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS - E1 Sobrante Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve . plans and specifications for Avenida Martinez Slide Repair Project, and advertise for bids to be received in three weeks, and opened at 11:00 a.m. on September 23, 1975. The Engineer's estimated construction cost is $10,000.00. The project consists of installing rock slope protection along the south bank of Wilke Creek, at Avenida Martinez, with minor grading and hydromulching of the slide area to prevent erosion by creek water. This project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class 1 c Categorical exemption. (RE: Project No. 1375-5835-75) (RD) Item 4. REPAIR OF DRAINAGE FACILITY - AUTHORIZE DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE - Martinez Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Department to perform work consisting of installing a drop inlet in an existing storm drain system which has failed. This will enable the system to function and prevent wide-spread flooding. This item is in accordance with the provisions of the Drainage Maintenance Policy (Board Resolution No. 72/17) . The estimated cost of work is $1,800.00. This work is a Class 1 Categorical exemption from Environmental Impact Report Requirements and will be done by County forces. (RE: Project No. DMP 76-3, Work Order 4743) (M) Item S. FRANKLIN CANYON ROAD - DEED CONVEYANCE - Pinole Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Board Chairman to execute a Grant Deed from Contra Costa County to the State of California for a small parcel of land which was dedicated to the County by Collier Carbon and Chemical Corporation on Franklin Canyon Road (Portion of State Highway 4) . The reconveyance to the State is required for widening of State Highway 4 and issuance of an encroachment permit by the State for a driveway on Franklin Canyon Road. This conveyance is a Class 1 Categorical exemption from Environmental Impact Report requirements. (RE: Work Order 4805) (R') A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 3 of 8 September 2, 1975 00014 SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT III Item 6. CAMPO CALLS - PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - Lafavette Area The Public'Works Department has requested the abandonment of Campo Calle from Quandt Road to Pleasant Hill Road. The existing road is one lane wide and is in a• substandard , condition. Campo Calle is presently blocked off at Pleasant Hill Road and is not needed for access to any property. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors set October 21, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the proposed abandonment. (LD) Item 7. BANCROFT ROAD - TRAFFIC REGULATION - Walnut Creek Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2147 be approved as follows: Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, parking is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times, on the west side of BANCROFT ROAD (Road #4061B) , Walnut Creek area, beginning at a point 20 feet south of the centerline of Minert Road and extending southerly a distance of 60 feet. (TO) Item 8. CANYON ROAD YARD DRAIN - APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARD CONTRACT - Moraga Area Informal bids were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on Wednesday, August 27, 1975 for the construction of a rear yard drainage system of a County-owned house backing on Canyon Road in Moraga. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans and specifications and award a contract to Remmil Corporation of Oakland in the amount of $1,818.00, the lowest bid of the two bids received. The existing drainage problem developed as a result of. the Canyon Road project, completed in 1974. This project is considered as exempt from Environmental Impact Report Requirements as a Class lc Categorical exemption. (RE: Project No. 2631-4165-75) (RD) Item 9. COUNTY PROPERTY - SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTY - Moraga Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the highest bid received at public auction held August 16, 1975 for the sale of County-owned property at 1000 Sanders Drive, Moraga, as authorized by Resolution- No. 75/514. The highest bid was from Clark Ransome in the amount of $52,355.00. .The above bid was the highest of seven sealed bids received with a minimum allowable bid of $42,000.00. (RE: l ork Order 4242) (R') A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 4 of 8 September 2, 1975 b 0001.5 I Item 10. SUBDIVISION 4444 - MAP APPROVAL - Walnut Creek Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: 1. Approve the map and Subdivision Agreement for Subdivision 4444. 2. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Subdivision Agreement and any appropriate extension thereto on behalf of Contra Costa County. Owner: Charles P. Hamilton and Dorothy N. Hamilton, 1095 Mt. View Boulevard, Walnut Creek-, CA 94596 Location: Subdivision 4444 is located on the south side of Mt. View Boulevard, between Hazelwood Drive and Amigo Lane. (LD) Item 11. HAWTHORNE DRIVE - PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - Walnut Creek *Area Mr. Frank H. Johnson, an adjacent property owner, has requested the abandonment of the most easterly end of Hawthorne Drive. This area was dedicated for public use on May 6, 1946, but no road has been constructed. The applicant is requesting this abandonment in order to fence off the area and landscape it. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors set October 21, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the proposed abandonment. (LD) AGENDA CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 5 o'f -8 September 2, SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT IV Item 12. JOHN GLENN DRIVE - APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AWARD CONTRACT - Concord Area Informal bids were received and opened in the office of the Public Works Director on Wednesday, August 27, 1975, for 'the construction of a median opening on John Glenn Drive. ' It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the plans and specifications and award a contract in the amount of $3,024.00 to Apollo Concrete of Antioch, which submitted the . lowest of the three bids received. Construction of the median opening is necessary in order to correct a traffic flow problem which exists in the area. This project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class lc Categorical Exemption. (RE: Project No. 4177-6072-75) (RD) SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT V " Item 13. VILLAGE PARKWAY - TRA?'FIC REGULATION - San Ramon Area At the request of local citizens and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic study, it is recommended that Traffic Resolution No. 2146 be approved as follows: Pursuant to California lehicle Code Section"22358, this Board hereby determines that 40 miles per hour is more than is reasonable and safe on that portion of VILLAGE PARKWAY (Road No. 5401) , beginning at the intersection of Alcosta Boulevard and extending southerly to the Alameda County Line, a street within the criteria of Section 22358; and this Board finds that 35 miles per hour is an appropriate and reasonable and safe prima facie speed limit there, and hereby so determines and declares. Traffic Resolution No. 1329, pertaining to an existing 40 miles-per-hour speed limit on Village Parkway, is hereby rescinded. (TO) Item 14. SAN RADION CREEK - AUTHORIZE CHANNEL WORK - Danville Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors, as ex officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, authorize the Public Works Director to perform maintenance and minor betterment in San Ramon Creek near Freitas Road, Danville, to repair storm damage. The work consists of installing a doom drain and replacing and grouting rock rip-rap. The work will be performed by a combination of County forces and hired equipment at an estimated cost of $6,500. Funds will be provided by Flood Control Zone 33 budgeted for maintenance and miscellaneous betterments. (continued on next page) A_ G E N D A Public Works Department Page 6 of 8 September 2, 1975 0001'7 e Item 14 continued: MENU_ This work is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from Environmental Impact Report requirements. (RE: Work Order 8076, Flood Control Zone No. 3B) Item 15. ALCOSTA BOULEVARD - ACCEPT DEED - San Ramon Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors accept the - Right of Way Contract and Grant Deed, both dated August 7, 1975, from Lawrence A. Davidson, et ux., and authorize the Public Works Director to sign the contract on behalf of the County. It is further recommended that the County Auditor be authorized ' to draw a warrant in the amount of $19,665.00, from Assessment District 1973-3 funds, payable to Title Insurance and Trust Company, Escrow No. CD-239417, and deliver to County Real Property Agent for payment. Payment is for .490 acres for road purposes, .263 acres for slope easement and .048 acres for drainage easement required for the project. Environmental and planning considerations have been complied with. (RE: Assessment District 1973-3, Road No. 5302) (RP) Item 16. WARIJER ROAD AND DEL PORTO ROAD - PROPOSED ABANDONMENT - Oakley Area Upon the recommendation of the Public Utilities Commission, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company has requested the abandonment of railroad grade crossings at Warner Road and Del Porto Road. It is recommended that the Board .of Supervisors waive the abandonment application fee and set October 21, 1975, at 10:30 a.m. for a public hearing on the proposed abandonments. (LD) Item 17. SUBDIVISION 4295 - ROAD AND OFFER OF DEDICATION ACCEPTANCES - Danville Area The construction of improvements in Subdivision 4295 has been satisfactorily completed. The $500.00 cash deposit as surety under the Subdivision Agreement, evidenced by Deposit Permit Detail No. 108412 dated May 30, 1973, is to be retained for one year in accordance with Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors: (a) Issue an Order stating that the work is complete. (b) Accept, for recording only, the Offer of Dedication for drainage easements from Garden Creek Development Company, Inc. dated August 25, 1975. (continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Department Page 7 of 8 September 2, 1975 yowls Item 17 continued: (c) Accept as County Roads the following named streets which are shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4295 filed June 6, 1973 in Book 157 of Maps at page 42. Diablo -Road Widening Richard Lane (36/56/0.31) Scotch Court (32/52/0.03) Soda Place (32/52/0.04) Road Group: 4825 Total Mileage: 0.38 mile Subdivision Agreement dated June 5, 1973 Subdivider: Garden Creek Development Company, Inc., 804 Richard Lane, Danville, CA 94526 Location: Subdivision 4295 is located on the east side of Diablo Road, opposite Arroyo Drive. (LD) GENERAL ' Item 18. ROUTINE DITCH CLEANING - AUTHORIZE DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE - Countywide Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors authorize the Public Works Department to remove vegetation and debris from various ditches throughout the County, as set forth on the list. entitled "Job 76-2-Routine List of Ditches for Vegetation and Debris Removal," in accordance with the provisions of the Drainage Maintenance Policy (Board Resolution No. 72/17) . The list is on file in the Glacier Drive office of the Public Works Department Am AVIGIOAd The estimated cost of work. is $25,000. This work is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption from Environmental' Impact'Report requirements and will be done by County forces. (RE: Project No. DMP 76-2, Work Order 4742) (M) Item 19. COUNTY AIRPORT LEASE - RENT ADJUSTMENT - Concord Area It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve a rental increase from $2,000 per year to $2,496 per year for the 2.22 acre parcel of Airport Clear Zone land, in accordance with the lease between the County and George Valente, et ux. The land is restricted to vehicle parking only and has no access, except to the Lessee's adjacent property (Sun Valley Ford Automobile Agency in Meridian Park) . (RP) NOTE Chairman to ask for any comments by interested citizens in attendance at the meeting subject to carrying forward any particular item to a later specific time if discussion by citizens becomes lengthy and interferes with consideration of other calendar items. A_ G E N D A Public Works Department- Page 8 of 8 September 2, 1975 "19 F c I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19 75 , In the Matter of Proceedings of the Board during the month of August, 1975• IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the reading of the minutes of proceedings of the Board for the month of August, 1975 is waived, and said minutes of proceedings are approved ' as written. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid Witness ray hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors effaced this 2nd day ofy5�3? em er . 19 7� J. R. OL.SSON, Clerk BY, ~ a J, Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 00020 H 24 8PS 10M ♦ l BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Zoning Ordinances Passed Date: September 2, 1975 This beim� the date fixed to consider adoption of the following ordinances) rezoning property as indicated, which was (were) duly introduced and hearing(s) held; The Board orders that this Ithese) ordinance(s) is (are) passed, and the Clerk shall have it (them) published as indicated. below: Ordinance . Application Number Applicant Number Area Newspaper 75-37 C. D. & S. A. Wailes 1933-RZ' Danville THE VALLEY PIONEER; PASSED on September 2, 1975 by the following vote:. AYES: Supervisors - J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty,- E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess NOES: Supervisors - none ABSENT: Supervisors - none I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct record and copy of action duly taken by this Board on the above date. ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board: on September 2. 1975 By:_, Deputy Bonnie Boaz on .3eotember 190 By: Deputy Bonnie Boaz c c: s l � - In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19 75 In the Matter of Ordinance(s) Introduced. The following ordinance(s) which amend(s): the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County as indicated having been introduced, the Board by unanimous vote of the members present waives full reading thereof and fixes September 10, 1975 as the- time for adoption of same. Ordinance Number Subject Repealing bicycle licensing ordinanc,_ (Ordinance No. 72-23) PASSED by the Board on September 2 , 1975 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered.on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of c p n to mh P r , 19 j-5 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ' Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M� R b i e a t i e r r 00 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 In the Matter of Affidavits of Publication of Ordinances. This Board having heretofore adopted Ordinances Nos. 75-29, 75-30, 75-31, 75-32, 75-33, 75-34, 75-35, 75-36. - and Affidavits of Publication of each of said ordinances having been filed with the Clerk; and it appearing from said affidavits that said ordinances were duly and regularly published for the time and in the manner required by law; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said ordinances are hereby declared duly published. The foregoing order was passed by unanimous vote of the members present. .1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a hue and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day ofSeptember , 19 75 J. R. OLSSON,. dlerk By Bonnie Boaz _ Deputy'Clerk M 24 12n4 • 15•M -Form #30 4/7/75 ON23 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19:75 In the Matter of Approving Personnel Adjustments. As recommended by the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the personnel adjustments attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, are APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 2,. 197,x• I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an ander entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab ofuesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy.Clerk: � H sa 12174 - 15-M Dorothk I cDonald 00M I I POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: C% Department of Agriculture Department Animal Control Division Budget Unit366 Date 4/11/75 Action Requested: Change title of Kennelman classification. Proposed effective date: ' As soon as possible Explain why adjustment is needed: to eliminate male designation for affirmative action. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: -" $ -- - 2. Fixed Assets: (.tiAt .stems catd cost) _ •� L: $ Estimated total $ -- Signature Department—ad Initial Detein.ination of County Administrator Date: April. 16. 1975 Request recommendation, pursuant to attached memod fo—unty AdmiftU&Vtt6r- IPersonnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: Au st 2 Zg7s Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate class and all positions of Kennelman to Animal Control Center Attendant. Study discloses duties and responsibilities are appropriate to the class'of Animal Control Center Attendant. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 and 71/17 to reflect the retitling and reallocation of class and positions of Kennelman to Animal Control Center Attendant, both at Salary Level 201 (817-993). .Personnel Director Reco.nmendation of County Administrator Date: August 29, 1975 Reallocate the class and all positions of Kennelman, Salary Level 261 ($817-$993), to Animal Control Center Attendant, Salary Level 261 ($817-$993), effective September 3, 1975. i County Administrator Action of tie Board of Supervisors S'? �� 1975 ' Add�;st.ment APPROVED (D RRB�) on - I R. OLSSON, ou. ty Clerk rate* S r P 2 1975 By: ,►� <<� .,r L,. 00M5 Deputy Clark APPRC 1A L S . hZS ,d'jUs Z-Jr2..t con titu tea cat App.+.oa.�.,..ati on Adjustment and Pm c nktet ResotuZEca Anendrrent. VepctV-Clerk ad1 u6 tir ea t constitutes an AWtoa.•. Eati.en Adjustment and PeA4 o nreC Resotution Anendrrent. "Vo .s 1 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUE-ST No: nL( L DISTRICT ATTORNEY "`"" March 27, 1975 Department Budget Un- 2 t �7Date. Action Requested: Establish class of District Attorney Investigator and reallocate five Welfare Investigator positions (STEIN, WATKINS, JOHNSTONEWOODS and NIMR) to this new 'Proposed effective date: Explain why adjustment is needed: Reorganization of Family Support Unit. Estimated cost of adjustment: �:.:�:r4 Costo County Amount: RECEIVED 1 . Salaries and wages: $ No change 2. Fixed Assets: (test .items and coat) KA 3 1 IW IS cvnry Estimated total - Signature Departme ea Mich! elan Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: Apr 7 , 3.975 To Civil Service: Al Request classification recommendatid Coun v Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 26, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the class of District Attorney Inspector. Reallocate Welfare Investigator positions #247-01 to 05 to District Attorney Inspector. On August 26, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the class of District Attorney Inspector and recommended Salary Level 375 (1156-1405). Study discloses duties and responsi- bilities are appropriate to the class of District Attorney inspector. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 and 71/17 to reflect the addition of District Attorney Inspector, Salary Level 375 (1156-1405) and the reallocatio of Welfare Investigator positions #247-01 to 05 to District Attorney Inspector, both at Salary Level 375 (1156-1405). Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: Auks t 29, 1975 Retitle and reallocate class and all positions of Welfare Investigator, #247-o1 to 05, to District Attorney Inspector, both at Salary Level 375 ($1,156-$1,405), effective September 3, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on SE p 7_ J. R. OLSSON. County Clerk l)iJV � Date: t-SEP Q5 By: -/ , i „>..1' 'f / ViIV DeputAlerk APPROVAL 06 this adjustment constitutes jut Appwpruati.on Adjustment and Pe"onne.0 Resotuti.on Amendment. POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department DISTRICT ATTORiyEY Budget Unit Date January- 1975 Action Requested: Re-title class of District Attorney Inspector II to District Attorney Supervising Inspector Proposed effective date: 3=1-75 Explain why adjustment is needed: to clearly define primary responsibility of the class, particularly to other agencies. Contra Losta Lounly Estimated cost of adjustment: RECEIVED Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: JAH 16 1975 $ no change 2. Fixed 4s$ets.: (ti6t .items curd coat) Office of County Administrator $ Estimated total �� Signature /m•'•�1 ',r �- Department Heald MichareL J. Phelan Initial Determir�atfon of County Administrator Date: February 6, 1975 To Civil Service: Request classification recommendatio�l� Co-unty Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 21, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reallocate class and all positions of District Attorney Inspector I to District Attorney Senior Inspector and District Attorney Inspector II to District Attorney Supervising Inspector Study discloses duties and responsibilities are appropriate to the class of District Attorney Senior Inspector and District Attorney Supervising Inspector. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 and 71/17 to reflect the retitUng and reallocation of classes and position of District Attorney Inspector I to DistrictAttorney Senior Inspector, both at Salary Level 417 (1314-1597) and District Attorney Inspector II to District Attorney Supervising Inspector, both at Salary Level 449 (1449-1761). Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: Augusv Retitle and reallocate class and all positions of District Attorney Inspector I to District Attorney Senior Inspector, both at Salary Level 417 ($1,314-$1,597); and retitle and reallocate class and all positions of District Attorney Inspector II to District Attorney Supervising Inspector, both at alary Levee"O'; ($1,449-$1,761), effective September 31 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors s�? 2 1975 Adjustment APPROVED ) on S E P 2 1975 J. R. OLSSON. County Clerk 00W ! Date: By: �!�.i.1,. z . i Depu Clerk APPROVAL o f thin adJubtne)zt W14t.i tutea an APP&0P&Uo'i Ad1uatr'ent and Peuonn¢.L ReAotuti.on Amendment. ..�w• ay POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Public Works Department Buildings & Grounds Budget Unit 079 Date 8-15-75 Action Requested: Reclassify person and position - Blair E. Geddes #23057 from 019-339-01 to 079-355-001 Proposed effective• date; AP Explain why adjustment is needed: The duties and responsibilities of this position have _evolved to the point where the current classification is inappropriate. Estimated cost of adjustment: Amount: 1 . Salaries and wages: Contra Costa C.ounr/ $ 1 ,175. (this fiscal year) 2. Fixed Assets: (ZiAt item mid cost) NoneRECEIVED s7 Al l> > ► �U $ Estimated total01fic of 1,175 this fiscal = County .� ; for year Signature , .77 Dep tment 'Head Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: August 21 75 To Civil Se?v1ce: Request _a`-ecommendation. ro-unty Admin stritor Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 26, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Reclassify 1 .Associate Architectural Engineer to Building and Grounds Engineer. Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Building and Grounds Engineer. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclassification of Associate Architectural Engineer position 001, Salary Level 461 (1503-1827 to Buildings and Grounds Engineer, Salary Level 501 (1698-2064). Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator = Date: August 29, 1975 Reclassify one (1) Associate Architectural Engineer, position number 01, Salary Level 461 ($1,503-$1,827), to Buildings and Grounds Enggineer, Salary Level 501 ($1,698-$2,064), effective September 3, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors $E P 2 1975 Adjustment APPROVED on J. R. OLSSON County Clerk Date: S E P 2 1975— By: usy perk APPROVAL o6 tW adJuatment eonatitatea mi Apptopniati.on AdJub#me t and Pehsonnet Reaotuti.on Amendment. APPROVAL o1 #Iia adjuA tt cosiatibaeA mi JkWLU &u'a"°" ..AJL ReaoLution AmeWr*fft- POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: R .� DepartmentP_s b Grounds Budget Unit 061 Date 3-26-75 Building Projects Action Requested: Reclassify Assistant Architectural Engineer Position No. 01 to Associate Architectural Engineer Proposed effective date! ASAP_' Explain why adjustment is needed: RECEIVED Estimated cost of adjustment: CountyCAsto Amount: 1. 1 ril� at wages: M R � ; Z75 $ 256/mo. maximus . 2. d (t"t •i tc�a mud coat) None ose o Uffice o fit C= LxKmly Administmfor$ Estimated total $ 256. Signature pa toren a Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: may 6s 1975 To Civil Service: 4 Request classification recommendation. O'�d) - — I Minty Admini-slAtor. Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 26, 1975 Classification and Pavy Recommendation Reclassify 1 Assistant Architectural Engineer to Associate Architectural Engineer. _.Study discloses duties and responsibilities now being performed justify reclassification to Associate Architectural Engineer. Can be effective day following Board action. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 to reflect the reclass fication of Assistant Architectural Engineer, position 001, Salary Level 408 (1279-1554) to Associate Architectural Engineer, Salary Levet 461 C003-1827). -'� Personnel Di rector Recommendation of County Administrator Date: August . 19 75 Reclassify one (1) Assistant Architectural Engineer, position cumber 01, Salary Level 408 ($1,279-$1,554), to Associate Architectural ineer, Salary Level 461 ($1,503-$1,827), effective Septer 3, 1975. County nTsfrrathK Action of the Board of Supervisors SEP 2 1975 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk Date: "£P 2 1975 _ By: ,. C 4 APPROVAL o f th" mdjuAbrA# corAtLtuotea ort it Adjuatwant mud Peuonna Rsaotuti oa Amejufmrt. ,<. / k Y � r11�11 /h 3 , j 2 �' ". I :SL`s ''h r 3' '�"k'� Y1> 3�� I h g g ' .- 1. 4. ... - k y ' .� .. ,.. - , •li t �`: A i sCC?`i iSX s 5 Sh. , t r F..OS ;IT .'I0N AID J.. U'-.ST, MEN`T REQUEST -� ",M ft No �'' fi"�a t 5 t i � � v r 3 Department Human Resources Agency/Medaca�udget Urn t 180 Date 8 13 75 s ' fl ,� ces KP a , illrl ; >A mr`.. ; I 65 ; ction Requested Reclassify..Social Program,Planner I-1posation #492 Ol to Executive{Ass3;S.,- 1. �,�K Mental Health Advisory Board and transfer from 180 to s40 xl. = -' 8-13 75' 11 Proposed effect��e datt,le �, .�4 X101 To' accom lash the: a ointment rof thea ince"b!n `�, K Pa 'Explain why adjustment is needed P PP77 � if z7 �� Ir - , is o / to the Executive Ass�is- ant to the Mental Health Advisory Board functlll�ion �; f h s _ a y� Estimated( cost` of ad ustment: Contra COSP Cout�fi Vis _ J / f : Amount z �- r qq 1 : Sailaries and wages11 $ .. w 2'. Fixed Assets`: (.?,ia .i.terri�:and:eau#? i(� i�75` ''� � . �� "�. 8. of $ s i� 1111, �1111i 31'/,5 oun m+rnstrcztort x �ill ' 5n U;F Estimated; total , f � F7 1 , $ � . S�gnature, ~'.6k,., -� ... k ., ,rj= �f � 1 i _. epartment ea � >' Y ,r Im ti al Det1:1ermt�nati, of:;County Adim m strator Date:1 �iuQust 18":}� 14975 ` To :Civil Service: ih � / F� ,� a. wr t .y/ ,S 7 {Request recommend ati.on. 1. 4, � � � ° f= �_ 11 ount -> m�n�st tor.-4i e " Personnel 'Office 'and/or :C��1 `Service Comm ssldr Date: ` i. ` II�� C' r`y ; z ------� . `I nut��Lr61975 4 .rldY ;��4irA{j< Classt , tea ono Pay Recommendation r r W. F Aeclassirfy ( ;Social Program=Planner I to Executive Assistant to the Mental{Hesltli Advisory Boardlll '._ :s r <t, 1. i C'"1' 1. r 4: SEE {' s s f'. *t _ �yw' Study disc�osSas .duties% and responsibilities 11-: now being pe.11lrformed justifyreclassificatio � to Executive sistant t1.o the :Meatal Health Board. -'Can Y �- ...,. Advisory Y be,effective °days tfo]:Ioin j- Y a s Board action. , =r�!A �qN � � � �-� ''d'a" r"'�"x 2 'er .:Iry 'Y' , +. �. 'r`,+.... T41he,abovPsction can ;be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17xrt6Xi,'' lect,A 'ktix r sig ii ficat on of S sal Program Planner,`I, positions `Dl11 , Salarys Level 371(,A4 1388) ;to Facecutiv ;Assistairt -to die l�iental Health Advisory Board, Salary Bevel .463r (1512 `1838). : ft¢ +ate z i{ - 'fL it w'S "7 Z`�x xr�3 r " . � 4.. -.. ". ' `� ` s �1^. r� +� 4 t .-��:-Person e D rector , _ � �. �:�;`�� <� � �� Recommendat�on :of County :Adm n�strator _ ° Date 5° August 29 �R14975 �� _ :w .,':; - 3,y .z^La a, F a ,?;( c..w.,rn .$ �t'^sx "t �#5' I. rz r r�.n. .; z 7 :. , a' •� a rs S1^5 ,1 Reclassafy ;one (1) .:Social Program Planner I,,S�os do I—, Ol# j j _ W Salary Level 37,1 1,142 $1 388)e, to Executive 1 Assistant }toy{theme; 29*11 �$ -11 Mental :Health Advisory Boad, Salary Level` 463 `($1�,5142 $1,838x) }-�� ;, � effective September. 3, 1975 �� `� k�� i_ , � w �- #ti c h11 �, 45 iy 4 r�T Y{ „. } ! vp BIW. �,; J P f Y y 1/iy„".�'•'FRZ ,P+^¢3<�`Y, ' ;.x, . +. ' Y County' m7 ni stra or,� } ; �� kr �., ' -. r 3 Acton of the Board of,Supervsoi^s SEP. 2 1875 - �' . Adjustment: APPROVED ( - on rr !W �. P Oa SSON_1 I -;,,,- ,�,'_ -,, County Clerk , 1. ", 1-1 , n w _ : _-- _ :,: 'I"�4 SEP 2 1975 - - --�'- � __+ - , , ,�`�Zl�;,�_!� ;r�.il;i��ill_lz�_`O,� ,�� , -�, Date By. �.,/ De -P- �K ,g 3 Pi 't .I _ . Clerk r APPROVAL as qu=a adj,ud nli i cone�,ctutea 'an A na hiliz conwAdjua�nentwand Pehaokn111�1e�.� ` � TiP.bO eLt�.LOYt 'Am2►tdment �; ' � r+ A Pp p h 11111.11�1.�� 1111/��rlll llIII II 1 I III tl11�.11�1 N 111 III1.1011. 1 r r ; �a �,�rsr� s 5, I 4 .c+f 5 t"r..f. "r',' y-�''aN,s�'4-•. a. t s` T ?t S..N y,♦ .. t a3-,_u P O S' I T: I D N A.D.J U S T.: M EN7 REQUEST _-Ad r;r _ p7r :.i .. - - - L Department CCCo_. Medical'•Services Budget Umt„ �h_ Date '!x/.11/75.. } ,y""3,� - c r }-r u N ,� t=r- .lq, Action Requested Reclas , .;, Account.Clsrk..TI.Poi.` 74i1 _Ol`to.Account. Cler*k�.III r FK :� i s; v _ - 4=: ., .. r t 1 y X�.XU fb �'^t[C ��ucjfinn' f,11�A nv . _. .. Paiilenti- Proposed effects�et�date gas SHOT[ a�Snx Explain why adjustment s needed �k . ' tee - _p,6plect the mere' sciecial�ped end. onnlex c ac Dunn K: c clerical work ands lead diraction over suoorcli nate cl�r3 cals� performing acc�ual�erork~ __, 'i `2. z ^t=1A n Er t 7 RZ:Z t erg f `�`1 k''e Contra Co51a Courrly '` 1 n Esti mated cost of add ustment: <�mdul3t ? 7k ' r ' s 1: Salaries and wages <1 i00r h ; 't ��' r � z 2 Fixed Assets (.e a .i tem3 :and coed), ; _ Y �, 1-;, ;� o N `� ��;`` Y a .__. 1,1.I T y + S x { tc Yt. F o�n .yclrninistr�for: � 4 c fir, F`,.. ►�u,.nAl - .c.� ac .vc�t Estimated tots j r ='121t.00!� = r , r* ti / /; L rc ` �` f_ Daft y� /.� Sl gnature dNard He t Adm r stra o"= n ev ., , , ,. .. ..:; - n �� ;, ? � �; Departure t a , x z w I ni ti al._Determ pati on of County Admt m s:trator - 4/-29/7 ' ' : ' Date S ' kequest reclasSif cati ., reconnendation p4 .1 u7 - t t-3 _ �'�-__ { r , attached. memorandum ;dated 'x�ril 29 1975. x` au x `� s` _ _ S A ,�jI '° �s 2 r ,r' ^: _ Dunt m r x .,_I. Personnel Office and/or :C�v�1 Servo ce Comm ss�on Date. au ugt 26 ' igys r ` r .3 X1 ss�f,' I Jon and Pay :Recommendation ,�r 51 Reclassify 1 Account Clerk II to Account Clerk III. r < 4 p w s r �{ W M1Study, discloses duties and responsibilities ,now being performed justify reclassification � y, .I to .Account Clerk III. Can be effective day following:Board act oa. 2 kMI, � � � The :.above;action can be accomplished by;amending Resolution .71/173 to iefl"' : the reclassi -- , ; _ � �,_ , fication`,of Account Clerk TT,' position Ol, Salary Level 234 (752 914 to A�ecount Clerk ZIZ4, . I . Salary ;Leve1 265 (827 1005) a t `r5 r' i _ _ . ,-. . 7 .i .. : - - r �,f-? i �: M1 t r �Jtom,ia.1. t t - r s �r." rr S�� J,I F �S Y Personnel,.Divector . _: r3 Recommendat�on of County Admi m strator t Date August Y 29h, '1975" �^�z y� w k <r . i Reclassify.= one (1)'`Account:..Clerk II ositi.on number"Ol Sal` �a ; $ k z :; P s Leel ;234 ($$, $.9.14), to Account Ciei k' III, Salary ,Level 265; `` ` ($'827 $1,005), eff ecti�e September 3, 1975. '. r � �a�� _ ^� aa7 't } �h.7 L YYi 1 t{ 1 7''x'37 Y 6. c h �.q s d F # ,. r: - �s+ r t -'. - County, Admi ni str-ator; { , - Action of the,,board of Supervi so.rs .. s Adjustment, .APPROVED (. ) on SEt' 2 1975 : - , . _ ,. y: 4;■Gc k b J`R OLSSON: County= erTc F '_ S 1975 • . �� . Date Biu / 3 T } F �� - Deputy Clerk � -i , � �¢ ' u b�-&Jt,L Dna ,i tide b an A no �n ca i.on Ad u b ien ands pelts o� fi �: APPROVAL v� xhcs add Pp p 1, y ;f hKx�<� �� `X ReboP.cttcon Amendment ` ` f 'X' =l r �. -'I ' w - ,_T-4,�,�.t? f.h.7;� k,r'", '•',j`%.._r.la•t t.,).X e�v,n-,- ,vuh ....:, .. . - d..,-x �,. _ ,.. i POS I T I ON ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: : 4 % Department _Sherif f-Coroner Budget Unit 255 Date 8/21/75 Action Requested: Cancel typist Clerk position 255-090-001 Proposed effective date g i 75 Explain why adjustment is needed: This position is a back-up position forbar�rAdpn who will be returning from leave of absence 9/2/75 Estimated.cost of adjustment: Amount: Contra Costa County 1 . Salarie`„s. aniwa es: 2. Fixed ksset (gCia items a:td coag RECEIVED A I I R 9 r, ;975 .,-. 17- $ Orrice of =moi Estimated tolWunty Administrator Signature ,. epa nt ea Initial Determination of County Administrator Date: August 26, 1975 To Civil Service Request recommendation. �f�1` i'' County Administrator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 27, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Cancel 1 Typist Clerk. Typist Clerk position #01 was established to replace an employee in the class of Intermediate Typist Clerk while on leave of absence. The employee has now returned to duty and the position is no longer necessary. Can be effective September 3, 1975. The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 71/17 by cancelling Typist Clerk position #01, Salary Level 162 (604-734). for Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator Date: August 29, 1975 Cancel one (1) Typist Clerk, position number 01, Salary Level 162 ($604-$734), effective September 3, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors c E P 2 1975 Adjustment APPROVED ( ) on $E w i 975 J. R. OLSSON. County Clerk Date: By: i-'I-!.i.,, i1: r pvty Clerk o(m APPROVAL oD tlzi.& adjub;bnesLt eo,4titutea an Appttopni.ati.on AdJuatment and Petcaonne-c Ruo.Zuti_on Amendrn-,nt. rc,# ;14..1 x rix c., .w.Y^tr: ^�r.�, j f .r:. 1 { ;1'x $ .,,%.. � , i .-—, ;3, f r cry.. 7 i' :�.,E �I 7,V N t`,.' €# 4,�7 d J v z : r, y ,T�t �f a 1 e * C i t, t R� �i z€ ii33II -,y �' s k'r �3c ... k s h.S I at ° n J4�i�d R E `d �4 I��' R e°t ;r }c > s w ..x c.-a 5`" :.9 't c t+� - i zi �,i� 1 �� -' :, S� ..,.,:� r =z L `� exz.k s �. s ��%� } J t i i �§�''tf ��n t �3r-, y .. 5; ¢!*1, • i ,.s '.:t sr' 3 r n j_" r r ,- v ,` .�.' ?;? '•.� ¢ w t,., '�s�t °± .aH �,�aii 1.r r _ ink ,.�c3 .r' _ ��' t r 1YT' { 4 I" I T I 0 `N ADJOUSTMEENT R�E��OUE�ST�� No �� i r .t �� _ '�, M:.✓.Fi5".Yr� >44 rv2q#II_.A-" �� ,��.y�,, ■n "f-3 _ - ai r.c.,; ,> i-,..a' '. 2"'°_r �4�^r."-tr.ua'�i :< �z"n�, � ` x. ,� ,�: r.+ s 4} f �+--,y. ,s.t �t,�. Cza4.,a7 ,{+z,C '-.+-�y a,g �}Department <-�Sher11, rff Coroner 6u_dget U�n�t,�256 Date 8/i5%T5'h, •- �� r €,: s,..Z t`< „t^.yam r �• -a '+��'t`� i,.r-Fs, s+y+- �t ",yY.y�u's` w .a$' S. y",z ■ 3�y*, mi t `3 v �.- r ,aA ,r syc::TE- m,.5.r- .y�'- # � '�" t :e `' +' r r r - �� _ �' : "?..n - r'S' ••i i.«-r%?�c J`r�'+L��I 7Q.. x`:.�`'. �s 1� Action Reques d ., `` - - 20 � - f � 4 to Classier one (1) xSheriff s Disyatcher aositiont25b092� 0 5 , � �— �� "r t r ..r c= r::r J- "� �y `� �'` ) k a�"yn x -ix � I`5z.• �`` R: ^F"a 5 v t Y Y '-t tci f } .E;y ; �f YEx'+ 3 atiL- y'ie■ k E Proposeeffectiyre dateI 9175 ' 1 6i > k `Q X' ',�... '3 ''Lr}ti'!h 1!"5 t i j.:'i' 2.E i;,e `r� y L9., r - r• ;,t>.4��} _Z,> w >•.f t.. _ 1 ..� t� f ,�az; �, , *M..r+. -+,s r tXpla�n why ad�ustment��s�needed Constance_ Dorse ` wzllb►eon.leah�e' ofabsencefo "oae -=k k z > 3 y w a. `t w{ 1. �r ,n f#.. ..� �" # 1"` Y� `i=r{. ^`�`> s >c`p,1 I ... .,pyran-L'� yam. ,q ,,rs i year. She #as if ledTy:for Afsability'retr=ement �Poax,clon to ;be�r�'ed 11l. p lien e�tu n t''` 4 _. ^w 'r N a M h ou,.e t'tyza'os e.,''^ s3_'yiay 'h"?"'"''` '.rs `��'r'. �' or retirement. r T � `. ' -S' w' �'; - + {. . r ..+ "' .t .s zs'>r`-k. 3 ar' as..s "",.; '�,;t'�e- aa: Estimated cost of�ad ustment 4 :a;;o Tr � Amount:zgzESUN °`�' )' J ;tl � Cphtrc V ��LI1� er.14 v' T)-. F .,,� .j ,2y,y.3k'.a 5'm $`.. e. in ,.it 1.� � 7 {{,,..� �f > r-,..<••y+"` µAQ .+.., w+s'�-'F� " a '«mak ' MW y-y 7 Salaries kand wages ,;� � <� � ;a.�� ,, - . +,�i ,, _ t { .P.l b �IiS.G7/Kl avLt:� tia/9 ' .�' ',; 3..' r ''"tOA-, T:1 ;rs.- `vt-_:3;s ,crti•,s„ "� -_ A i t z Fixed Assets, ( 1 x »�/�- '� _ ";�L t� 1�-� r i xAft ?s-� a }, s '_ .x I.z r_ 4- ! � 7 !^- _'zd'' r.�s5! ,€. s �t e.i x"t. > a '� 4 s z <' , K ..-: t i � rf L. j fY 1.i 4 r•, ,., � 14xA r„r„s 9�' - A .s Y _ a v,u f'"L` S.'',:I S 3r.�,' f" s sa r � r � ..'+- ,� _ � ' �f: r% '{�n2T*C o1 'F''T.o.a't"4 rr ek"'F 3z "'.a4 ,'f; '.c K l b _ � r Y wA►c'mm�stra�or �_;.,kv Y�� sr G t Est�mated�tot , - ti v ,K ---tea ih .fil _ ,5 t "5 2 2 .) ,. S f� .r '+!F".`1 b y'hF'�..`;t�_..yr A r ,a r a ti.,t i Y k d�L _ .rax s I` '''tt; r i ','�` �'-'., } a .. — $ z ti ;s t t'� ,n y. � ,',ay T�11 �< ~ ,�,�J ,+.ix �§ins # �. ,� n tur 3 9ai�T a tk F r ,tea l � ML patfw -.� i .... ,' ,+t..;<,,� .. •+ !;� "`' .,�.• r-+... .tea. s-rf _ .. _F -� - y. .td. - µ .,".. rr..., ; :., r. 2 -.,- .� .vr s1✓� tx.l! 7pk_Z _ f ;.I ' ti I^3 Q to i nate on =of Cou ty GA_ a or �, e. j9>75 _2 n Aim n�str t Dat 8' 9r, ME Reques. , recommendation. � :�� r { s bar _ ��} YF f _ s s L.z!-.,f 4 MI6 - o nt m�m strator _ ti# ` - } Personnel- Of,��ceK nd/or Civil SerYlce- Co10ir! ion s A-261 1975 ; '# x _ s ..._.' ..s: ;..f t-.,,.v .....:..'._.., ,:.-.- r:..,, r r r-, x',, t &. ,'„,"r.' mss.+'rCl.,"-�`"r'x,y Date �� h Classifli�cat�oa�a1.Pay YRecommendatIon €t r t 5 s -ter_ - ,� T i...._iyt�Sy�,Si it,F s.# 7",-E='114-1w'ei'r"z'^. €. ■�. N X S.'Y i'Y ,tf. Classif j�I} Slglrif 's dispatcherIr �Y. �, t,F't, ry C°'xF , r '� € r _ ° '''4 §C ��;` r dor fix -�{ r r^ �"° m-. .1�11 This posi`�ioii is ,, _. established to.:accomodate replacemeat `for�Sherif£t s e,Dispatche x ,on aLeave 4of absence * Can Abe effective day.%following;Board action:v7 r A �F+ r: ri - ;�, ,,.s.��..,K ..*-� c .,. l- r Nr,, -- 1 a^A lr ��", r"3 -`-.--..'c'T ,x as:�r saanir.�±.- .;+.. Thee above an ion can be accomplished by{(amending ,Resolution 7 /l �iby�aad%m'gr *She ;;r Dispatcher, , a y .Level 273 (847 1030) This position to ,be caaceYled.Nupo eturQ o= _ .c .s;,.-- i .•�++�`� :T,:.. r s, i � K.<- i E>! r." sr"z-N' a.1' x ys Al.!; q_3, P'. ,��tx = } _ separation of,employee<in position X04. z r, �, y =xv , A �� - .. 1. 91, t `r '�,f f` zA -,KT .s TAT - p` r �f,�yY'. �'r"' ti _ s ..� :. }. _ { 4 - �p.e` y�� t ,�r�,,s t- ri ,' ..per L �, `�- 'F" ?rfr � t L.*�i4 i ". %-�.-�'Sr't./ •T��`iiy.zf`.r`".r'.+- ' "Y'1. ■m " ,,. Personnel:: Dtrecto61T, t,i z..� n� ;� � Z_4 - k Recommendat�on of County `Adm ni strator � Date.11 'w r' "Augur t , els _ � �� , ` x + f ; _ `1 .rr 1,`w ,,, >,£ 5�?-.4'" a�•U u•Y4r`...F~'T' "},E"A I ,laa•ir _ :;Add ;11 one w(1)� Sheriff's Dispatcherk, jSalary LdVd � 7 � sof>�s� ��r��, � 5iv a-_ �' {$847 $1 030),1reffecti.�e Septemberty3, 1975; this7=1ositton; _� I, , I- _= "` to be caccelledx u on�retuin or separation`:o£ employee h` d � � .>v :.,< ., ...i �,: '7# ktr rwi ..r` r,.r..r"-1 C.^.N sC; �y� k,4}I . position nwnber 04. y S *,�. >< rf r =y.-,-;t ',i v.�,.4 t3,A i S_- v-Y x. i t _ 4 € H� oy ''„�`,siz 36 +'lrr r 'a,^""3 c" �,r - n. P Y Y sT" r` ', �'S7"'�b ?��• _ Tr .4 ., •tri` {■o k _.'d'" r F � I � tC �i County Adm m strator (S , .. _"' F 1 S...u+._r tet...-L3J. ? .._. G, V T 4 t. Y,,}fit,Z ".4 ' AmiN - `y4 N ction of the Board of.. Superv�sors 175 Adjustment ,;APPROVED _ ) :o n S"E� u �a # 4Im- � , is r,�'1T,„si "N q ,moi? � p".f„"1� 4 J R `OLSS�N;; :;wwlerfi` � - 29T5 asp �_ Date S = 4 — P�� ck' w �� - By cJ . �7 W r i sf e r, t11 ria ' APPROVAL�v� . � ub#menat:conazctuteb an App�iopiva#,c-on Adjunenand:P¢hso►tei¢,CINT ,Y- "t t y Y.'_ n sY,. 3- ,•,:-:, E i r W.sem s #-a.€'x $ x �af:l - .vSms's R otutc on .AfiM m ,,,}. �..:� : i L, 't t,. r }`QA''=r.$� Q� 111ltQYit{tI1QYbt x »=�,k ! eras «, Y`"- i K x i r n'37n. rte. it•`: ` Fyp Y "- ,'k�rr. ��'-«"1 �y•:�`s {�,7'�::��r zr�n ,1` £'i,`��`a. ,€T L F� y r ,,,, ^v., r-_.., .,.s ._ :F�'-. R E r,'Lr,-„ f:'.. ' .-1>s2. �e'... rs.nrt..r. .�- ., 1-:1 5 ,... Date: P 2 1975 By: `/ ,J epufy C erk 00033 APPROVAL o6 tiaA ad u�#mextt eoreatZWeb an APP�9tiation Adju6znent and PeAsonnet Reaoteuti.on Amendment. a�> POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST No: Department Civil Service Budget Unit 035 Date Aug. 25, 1975 Action Requested: Create classes of Office Manager I and Office Manager H. Proposed effectivePdate:. A,sAp Explain wily adjustment is needed: Classification appropriately describes duties assigned. Estimated cost of adjustment: Contra CoVia County - Amount: RECEIVED 1 . Salaries and wages: � AUG 26 1975 $ 2. Fixed Assets:- (Us t items and cost. L u� $ _ unty fth trator Estimated total $ = Signature ^} Depar nt Head Initial Determiffttion of County Administrator Date: _august 26, 197 To Civil Service: Request recommendation. County A m/i n strator Personnel Office and/or Civil Service Commission Date: August 26, 1975 Classification and Pay Recommendation Allocate the classes of Officer Manager I and Office Manager H. On August 26, 1975, the Civil Service Commission created the classes of Office Manager I and rec6mmended Salary Level 346 (1058-1286) and Office Manager II and recommended Salary Level 389 (1207-1467). The above action can be accomplished by amending Resolution 75/592 by adding Office Manager I, Salary Level 346 (1058-1286) and Office Manager II, Salary Level 389 (1207-1467) . Can be effective day following Board action. These positions are exempt from overtime. Personnel Director Recommendation of County Administrator - Date: August 29, 1975 Allocate to the Basic Salary Schedule the class of Office Managers Salary Level 3.46 ($1,058-$1,286) and the class of Office Manageizf Salary Level 389 ($1,207-$1,467), effective September 3, 1975. County Administrator Action of the Board of Supervisors SEP 2 1975 Adjustment APPROVED ) on J. R. OLSSON,-County Clerk Date: SEP 2 1975 - By: L>" raaa De uty Clerk APPROVAL o6 .t.Iti,6 adjustment eo,6.tituteb at Appn.op"u.ati-o►i AdjustmeEt and Pex6onnee Rebotuti.on Amendment. .. ___ _—„_..�.�..,....,._... •..,....,..�,-..,...r. � err +s..*,�*,.^ AYYKUVAL 06 coal uuJU,6,u„,_,vLl. t,.ut 4---L , ReaotCution Ame►tdment. z R C:Cs23� n RE 7i i?�i :.:•"•i.i�il�.Tt Alp Ti r fel i is ti%• f)'a• ft:.- •.� ", TO CLER1: BOMM OF at o`clock M. SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County Records. J. R. OLSSON, County Recorder Fee $ Official BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COVm.RA COSTA •COU114TY, CALIFORNIA In the 1•iatter. of Accepting and Giving ) RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE. Notice of Completion of Contract with ) and NOTICE OF COrl1?LETIO Ted R. Jenkins Comusny, Inc. (C.C. 03086, 3093) -T—Work Order 9 RESOLUTION: NO. 75/691 The 'Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ]RESOLVES THAT: The County of Contra Costa on June 9, 1975 contracted with Ted R. Jenkin's Company, Inc. 400 The Toledo Suite 08 Long Beach, Californiq90$03 Base and Address of Conzracfor) for the first nhasR of t�A 1075Rlr)rry RAA1 P;-ninct in the Enat Richmond ,�• IT- nts and Tara Hi 11 s - eaa i rh vith UnitEtil PqnifinT ct r as surety, Name of Bonding Company for work to be performed on the grounds of the County; and The Publin :forks Director reports that said wort: has been inspected end complies with the approved plans, special provisions, and stand4rd specifications, and recommends its acceptance as complete as of Alig„rt 1), - 147K 1 Therefore, said pork is accepted as completed on said date, and the Clerk shall file with the Coivaty Recorder a copy of this Resolution o and Notice as a Notice of Completion. for -said contract. - An extension of (4 days ) contract time' is 'ranted due to a variety of reasons over which the Contractor had no control. PASSED AND ;,OPTED ON September 2. 1975 • CERTIFICATIO?: and VERIFICATIO;i I certify that the forehoina is a true and correct copy of a resolu– tion Pund accepta*±ce duly adopted and entered on the minutes of this Board' s meeting on the above date. I declare tinder penalty of perjury that t.e foregoirn is true and correct. Dated: September 2, 1975 J. R. OLSSO'17 County Clerk &: at 1111artinez, California ex officio Clerk of the Board By Constance J. Davies Deputy C.Lery, cc: ,-.t!cora ana return Contractor Auditor ])ublic Works -• #see--- RESOLUTIOIN NO. 75/691 00035 < — s IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving Plans ) and Specifications for ) Avenida Martinez Slide Repair, RESOLUTION NO. 75/692 El Sobrante Area. ) (Project No. 1375-5835-75) WHEREAS Plans and Specifications for slide repair on Avenida Martinez (rock slope protection along the south bank of Wilke Creek with minor grading and hydromulching of the slide area to prevent erosion by creek water), El Sobrante area, have been filed with the Board this day by the Public Works Director; and WHEREAS the general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been approved by this Board; and WHEREAS this project is considered exempt from Environmental Impact Report requirements as a Class lc Categorical Exemption; and IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that said Plans and Specifica- tions are hereby APPROVED. Bids for this work will be received on September 23 1975 at 11 a.m. , and the Clerk of this Board is directed to pu ish Notice to Contractors in the manner and for the time required by law inviting- bids for said work, said Notice to be published in THE kOSSM00R NEWS PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on September 2, 1975 cc: Public Works Director County Auditor-Controller RESOLUTION NO. 75/692 00M3" aw ,. -... .. .vim. Avenida Martinez, Slide Repair • - Proj. No. 1375-5635-75 For Pre--Bid- Information, Contact Road Design -Division Phone (415) 372-2.131: SPECIAL PROVISIONS < FOR CONSTRUCTION, ON COUNTY HIGHWAY { AVENIDA MARTINEZ SLIDE REPAIR, Fi=� •LE . � �: f y �,�i1975 ,: LocssoN: COUNTY ROAD NO. 1375BJ VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA ,r September 2, 19-75 Microfilmed with boordorder is September 2, 1975 Miuofilmed with hoard order late. w Avenida Martinez Slide Repair Project No. 1375-5835-75 N D E X SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PAGE 1 . Location- A-1 2. Description of Work A-1 3. Contract Documents A-1 4. Beginning of Work, Time of Completion b Liquidated Damages A-1 5. Permits A-2 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS I . Definitions and Terms B-1 2. General B-1 3. Proposal (Bid) Requirements and Conditions B-1 4. Award and Execution of the Contract (S.S.3) B-1 5. Scope of Work B-3 _ . 6. Control of Work B-4 7. Control of Materials B-4 8. Legal Relations and Responsibility B-4 9. Prosecution and Progress B-9 10. Measurement and Payment B-11 SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1 . Definition C-1 2. Labor C-1 3. Equipment C-I SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . Measurement and Payment D-1 2. Lines and Grades D-1 . 3. Materials D-2 4. Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing D-2 5. Remove Drainage Facilities D-3 6. Grading of Slide Area D-3 7. Corrugated Steel Pipe D-4 8. Flexible Drain Pipe D-4 9. Slope Protection D-4 10. Erosion Control D-5 ATTACHMENTS CC County Standards A62-C.7 D97-A 3040 ��QtK7 SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1 . LOCATION The project is located in the EI Sobrante area along the north side of Avenida Martinez. 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work consists of installing rock slope protection (Facing Method B) , minor grading and hydromulch treatment of the slide area, installing miscellaneous drainage facilities, and such other items or details, not mentioned above, that are required by the Plans, Standard Specifications, or these special provisions to be performed, placed, constructed or installed. 3. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The work embraced herein shall conform to the Plans entitled, "AVENIDA MARTINEZ SLIDE REPAIR," the Standard Specifications of the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, dated January, 1975 insofar as the same may apply, these special provisions, the Notice to Contractors, the Proposal , the Contract, the two contract bonds required herein, any supplemental agreements amending or ex- tending the work, working drawings or sketches clarifying or enlarging upon the work specified herein, and to pertinent portions of other documents included by reference thereto in these special provisions. 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION 8 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Attention is directed to the provisions in Section 8-1 .03, "Beginning of Work," Section 8-1 .06, "Time of Completion," and Section 8-1 .078 "Liquidated Damages," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The Contractor shall commence work upon receipt of directions to proceed as stated in the "Notice to Proceed" issued by the Public Works Department and shall complete the work within the allotted time of : 15 WORKING DAYS counting from and including the day stated as the starting date In the "Notice to Proceed." A - 1 00039 7 SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4. BEGINNING OF WORK, TIME OF COMPLETION d LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The Contractor shall pay to the County of ' Contra Costa the sum of $75.00 per day for each and every CALENDAR DAY of delay In finishing the work in excess of the number of working days prescribed above, and authorized extension thereof. 5. PERMITS Grading - The Contractor shall comply with the. applicable provisions In the County Grading Ordinances(Title 7=Division' 716 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code) in the process of disposing of the excess material as fill on private property within the County. Flood Control - The Contractor shall comply with the applicable provisions ot the County Ordinance (Division 1010-Title 10) In the process of doing any work Involving the creek bed and channel . Full compensation for conforming to Permit requirements shall be considered as included in the price paid for the contract Items for which the permits are required. A - 2 . Ott* I -REVISED 2-14-7a SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . DEFINITIONS AND TERMS As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires , the following terms have the following meanings: , a. AGENCY means the legal entity for which the work is being performed as indicated on the Notice to Contractors, Proposal and Special Provisions. b. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS means the governing body, of the Agency. c. ENGINEER means the Contra Costa County Public Works Director (Road Commissioner-Surveyor; ex officio Chief Engineer) , or his authorized agent acting within the scope of his authority, who is the Agency 's representative for administration of this contract. �d. STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS (S.S. ) means the Standard Specifications o the State of California, Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, (hereinafter sometimes referred to as S.S. ) , dated January, 1975. Any reference therein to the State of California or a State agency, office or officer shall be inter- preted to refer to the Agency, or its corresponding agency, office or officer acting under this contract. e. EQUIPMENT RENTAL RATES AFID GENERAL PREVAILING IIAGE RATES means the latest edition of the Equipment Rental Rates and General Prevailing Nage Rates of the State of California, Business • and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, adopted annually by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, and on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors . f. OTHER PERTINENT DEFINITIO%.S - See S.S. Section 1 . 2. GENERAL a. State Contract Act. Unless otherwise specified in Section A of these special provisions , or elsewhere by special order, the provisions of the State Contract Act (Government Code Section 14250 et seq. ) shall not apply to this contract, and reference thereto in S.S. Sec. 1-1 .40 is hereby waived. b. Standard Specifications. The Standard Specifications (S.S . ) referred to a ove are by reference fully incorporated herein except to the extent that they are modified herein . 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2 shall apply except as modified herein. - 000a erein. o0 B - 1 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREHENTS AND COUIDITIONS (Cont. ) a. Examination of Plans , Specifications , Contract and Site of Work (S.S. 2-1 .03) Records of the Department referred to in the second paragraph of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .03 may be inspected in the office of the Public Works Director for the County of Contra Costa, Martinez, California. b. Proposal (Bid) Forrs "(S.S. 2-1 .05) (1) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 concerning the pre-qualification of bidders as a condition to the furnishing of a proposal form by the department shall not apply. (2) All proposals (bids ) shall be made on forms :to be obtained from the office of the Public Works Director, at the address indicated on the Special Provisions ; no others will be accepted. (3) The requirements of the second paragraph in S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 are superseded by the following: All proposals (bids) shall set forth for each item of work, in clearly legible figures , an item price and a total for the item in the respective spaces provided, and shall be signed by the bidder, who shall fill out all blanks in the proposal (bid) form as therein required. (4) The requirements of the last two paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .05 shall not apply. C. Proposal (Bid) Guaranty (S.S. 2-1 .07) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .07 are superseded by ;the following: (1 ) All proposals (bids) shall be presented under sealed cover. (2) Each proposal (bid) must be accompanied by a Proposal Guaranty in an amount equal to at least 10 percent of the amount bid. Guaranty may be in the form of cash , certified check, cashier's check, or bidder's bond payable to the specific Agency. 1 d. Competency of Bidders (S.S. 2-1 .11 ) The requirements of S.S. Sec. 2-1 .11 shall not apply. Attention is directed to S.S. Sec. 7-1 .01E and the rp q,uirements of law referred to therein relating to the licensing of Eton-n-fna to rs. 4 • B - 2 '• B - 2 00 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. PROPOSAL (BID) REQUIREIIcNTS AND CONDITIONS (Cont. ) d. Competency of bidders . 2-1 . 11 Cont. All bidders must be contractors holding a valid license to perform the required work as provided by the Business and Professions Code, and may be required to submit evidence to the Agency as to their ability, financial responsibility, and experience, in order to be eligible for consideration of their proposal . 4. AWARD AND EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT (S.S. 3) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 3 shall apply except as modified herein. a. Award of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .01 ) As used in S.S. Sec: 3-1 .01 "Director of Public Works" means the Board of Supervisors . b. Contract Bonds (S.S. 3-1 .02) The successful bidder shall furnish a Faithful Performance Bond in 'the amount of the total bid and a Labor and Materials Bond in an amount of at least- fifty percent (50%) of the total bid, each in- the form approved by the Agency. c. Execution of Contract (S.S. 3-1 .03) Within seven (7) days after its submission to him, the successful bidder shall sign the contract and return it, to- gether with (1 ) the contract bonds , and either (2-a) a certificate of consent to se. f-insure issued by e Director of Industrial Relations , or (2-b) a certificate of Workmen 's Compensation Insurance issued by an admitted insurer, or (2-c) an exact copy or duplicate thereon" certified by the Director or the insurer. A - sample copy of the Agreement (Contract) to be executed by the Contractor can be obtained from the County Public Works Department, at the address indicated on the Special Provisions . d. The Guaranty of the successful bidder will be returned within fifteen (15) days after the contract is finally executed and approved, and Guaranties of other bidders will be returned promptly after the execution of the contract. 5. SCOPE OF WORK. (S.S. 4) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 4 shall apply except as modified herein. In lieu of the provisions in the third paragraph in ection 4-1 .036 , "Increased or Decreased Quantities ," of the ,ti tAodard Specifications , the following shall apply: B - 3 d - � SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 5. SCOPE OF WORK (S .S. 4) (Cont. ) If the total pay quantity of any major item of work required under the contract varies from the quantity shown on the Proposal by more than 25 • percent, in the absence of an executed contract change order specifying the compensation to ; be paid the compensation payable to the Contractor will be determined in accordancewith Sections 4-1.03B(l ) - '4-1 .038(2) , or 4-1 .036(3) , as the case may be. A major item of work shall be construed to be any item, the total cost of which is equal to or greater than 10 percent of the total contract amount, computed on the basis of the Proposal quantity and the contract unit price. 6. CONTROL OF WORK (S.S. 5) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 5 shall apply. 7. CONTROL OF MATERIALS (S.S. 6) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 6 shall apply. 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPORSIBILITY (S.S.7) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7, except as modified by the agreement ( Contract) or these special provisions, apply to this project. - a. Insurance (1) The Contractor, before performing any' work under the agreement, shall , at no expense to the Agency obtain ' ': and maintain in force the following insurance: (a) With respect to the. Contractor's operations: r 8 - 4 SECTION B - GERERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIOUS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) _ (i) regular Contractor's Public Liability Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars $250 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person, and at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and (ii ) ' regular Contractor's Proeerty Damage Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars ,000 ) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or aggregate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and (b) With respect to Subcontractors' operations , Contractor shall procure or cause to be procured in their own behalf: (i) regular Contractor's Protection Public Liability Insurance for at least Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars 0 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of any one person , and for at least Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500 ,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or deaths of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and (ii) regular Contractor's Protective Property Damaqe Liability Insurance for at least Fifty Thousand Dollars $50 ,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property in any one accident or occurrence, and, subject to that limit per accident or occurrence, a total (or a gregate) coverage of at least One Hundred Thousand Dollars (100,000) for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property during the policy period; and (c) Without limitation as to generality of the foregoing subdivisions (a) and (b) , a policy or policies of Public Liabilit and Property Damage Insurance in amounts not less than 250 ,000/ 500 ,000 Public Liability and $50 ,000 Property Danage Insurance, insuring the contractual liability of Contractor under the provisions of this Section as hereinafter stated. THE POLICY OR POLICIES , OR RIDER ATTACHED THERETO, SHALL NAME THE SPECIFIC AGENCY AS A NAMED IUSURED. B - 5 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont_ ) a. Insurance (Cont. ) (2) Form, Term, Certificates (a) The insurance hereinabove specified shall be in form and placed with an insurance company or companies satis- factory to the County, and shall be kept in full force and effect until completion to the satisfaction of and acceptance by Agency of all work to be performed by Contractor under the agreement. (b) The Contractor shall furnish , or cause to be furnished, to the Agency certificate(s) of insurance or certified copies of the policies of insurance hereinbefore specified. Said certificate(s) shall provide for notice of cancellation to the Agency at least ten (10) days prior to cancellation of the policy. - __ b. Public Safety The provisions of S.S. Sec. 7-1 .09 shall apply except as modified under Section D - "Public Convenience, Public Safety and Signing" of these special provisions. Maintenance of all project signing, portable de- lineators , flashing lights , and other safety devices , shall be the responsibility of the Contractor at all times . The Contractor shall respond promptly, when contacted by the Engineer, or other public agencies , to correct improper conditions or inoperative devices . Failure to frequently inspect and maintain lights and barricades in proper operating condition when in use on the roadway, or failure to respond promptly to notification of im- properly operating equipment, will be sufficient cause for- suspension of the contract until such defects are corrected. All expenses incurred by the Agency because of emergency "call-outs ," for correcting improper conditions or for resetting or supplementing the Contractor's barricades or warning devices , will be charged to the Contractor and may be deducted _ from any monies due him. c. Preservation of Property The provisions of Section 7-1 .11 of the Standard Specifications shall apply to all improvements , facilities , trees or shrubbery within or adjacent to the construction area that are not to be removed. Q. . ,. 00046 SECTION 8 - GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS B. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) c, Preservation of Property (Cont. ) The last two sentences of paragraph 2 of Section 7-1 .11 of the Standard Specifications are superseded by the following; If the Contractor fails to make the necessary repairs to damaged drainage or highway facilities in the vicinity of the construction area cr to Other damaged facilities or property within the rights- of-way or easements shot-in on the plans , the Engineer may make or cause to be made such repairs as are necessary to restore the damaged facilities or property to a condition as good as when the Contractor entered on . the work. The cost of such repairs shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor under the Cnntract. . d. Rights-of-Way and Easements The rights-of-way, easements , rights-of-entry, fill permits and other permits acquired by or on behalf of the Agency are, as far as can be determined, adequate for the `perfor- mance of the work under this contract. Any additional rights-of- way , easements , or permits which the Contractor determines are necessary or convenient for the performance of the work shall be obtained by the Contractor at his expense. e. Access to Construction Site The Contractor shall make his own investigation of the conditions of existing public and private roads and of clearances , permits required, restrictions , road and bridge load limits , and other limitations affecting transportation and ingress and egress to the job site. The unavailability of access routes or. limitations thereon shall not become the basis for claims against the. Agency or extensions of time for completion of the work. f. Responsibility for Damaqe The provisions of the sixth , seventh , and eighth paragraphs of S.S. Sec. 7-1 .12, regarding retention of money due the Contractor shall not apply. B 7Q�t G a, SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS . '8. LEGAL RELATIONS AND RESPOIISIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) g. Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Wave or Earthquake Subparagraphs A, C, E and F of Section 7-1 .165, "Damage by Storm, Flood, Tidal Wave or Earthquake; ":of�the Standard Specifications are amended to read: 1. Occurrence--"Occurrence" shall include tidal waves , earthquakes in excess of a magnitude of 3. 5 on the Richter Scale, and storms and floods as to which the Governor has proclaimed a state of emergency when the damaged work is located within the territorial limits to which such proclamation is applicable or, which were, in the opinion of the Engineer, of a magnitude at the site of the the work sufficient to have caused such a proclamation had they occurred in a populated area or in an area in which such a proclamation was not already in effect. 2. Protecting the Work from Damage--Clothing •in this section shall be construed to relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to protect the work from damage. The Contractor shall bear the entire cost of repairing damare to the work caused by the occurrence which . the Engineer determines was due to the failure of the Contractor to comply with the requirements of the Plans and Specifica- tions , take reasonable and adequate measures to protect the work or exercise sound engineering and construction practices in the conduct of the work, and such repair costs shall be excluded from consideration under the provisions of this section. 3. Determination of Costs--Unless otherwise agreed between the Engineer and the Contractor, the cost of the work performed pursuant to this Section 7-1 . 165 will be determined in accordance with the provisions in Section 9-1 .03, "Force Account Payment," except that there shall be no markup allowance pursuant to Section 9-1 .03A, "Work Performed by Contractor, " unless the Occurrence that caused the damage was a tidal wave or earthquake. The cost of emergency work, which the Engineer determines would have been part of the repair work if it had not previously been performed, will be determined in the same manner as the authorized repair work. The cost of repairing damaged work which was not in compliance with the require- ments of the plans and specifications shall be borne solely by the Contractor, and such costs shall not be considered in determining the cost of repair under this Subsection E. � n nAA SECTIGA B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 8. LEGAL RELATIOUS AND RESPONSIBILITY (S.S. 7) (Cont. ) 4. Payment for Repair Work--When the Occurrence that caused the damage was a tidal wave or -earthquake, the County will pay the cost of repair,, determined Ias. provided in Subsection E, that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes . When the Occurrence that caused the -damage was a storm or flood, the County will participate in the ,cost of the repair determined as provided in Subsection 'E in accordance with the following: (a) On projects for which the amount .of ,the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is $2 ,000,000 or less , the County will pay 90 per cent of the cost of repair that exceeds 5 per cent of the amount of the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes. (b) On projects for which the Contractor's bid for bid comparison purposes is greater.thar $2,000,000, the County will pay 90 per cent of the cost of repair that exceeds $100,000.' 9. PROSECUTION ARD PROGRESS The provisions of S.S. Sec. 8 shall apply except as modified herein. (.row ' 6 - 9 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) a. Subcontracting (S.S. 8. 1 .01 ) The items of work in the Engineer's Estimate preceded by the letters (S) or (S-F) are designated as "Specialty Items. " b. Assignment (S.S. 8-1 .02) Neither the contract, nor any monies due or to become due under the contract, may be assigned by the Contractor without the prior consent and approval of the Board _of Supervisors , nor in any event without the consent of the Contractor's surety or sureties , unless such surety or sureties have waived their right. to notice of assignment. c. Beginning of Mork (S. S. 8-1 .03) In lieu of the provisions of S.S. Sec. 8-1 .03, the Contractor will be issued a "Notice to Proceed" by the Engineer within five (5) working days of the date the contract is approved by the Agency and the working days charged against the cont-act shall be counted from the day stated as the starting date in the "Notice to Proceed. " The Contractor shall not start work prior to the date stated in the "Notice to Proceed" unless a change to an earlier date is authorized in writing by the Engineer. d. Progress Schedule (S.S. 8-1 .04) The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a practicable progr•!ss schedule before starting any work on the project and, if requested by the Engineer, supplementary progress' schedules shall be submitted within five (5) working days of the Engineer's written request. e. Time of Completion (S. S. 8-1 .06) The following days are designated as legal holidays : January 1 , February 12, 3rd Monday in February, last Monday in May, July 4, lst Monday in September, September 9 , 2nd Monday in October, November 11 , 4th Thursday in November, December 25, Statewide election days , hours from 12:00 noon to 3:00 p.m. on Good Friday, and any other day established as a general legal holiday by proclamation of the Governor of California or the President of the United States. 0(00 } 8 - 10 SECTION B - GENERAL PROVISIONS 9. PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS (Cont. ) e. Time of Completion (S.S. 8-l .'06) (•Cont. ) If any of the foregoing holidays falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be considered to be a holiday. 10. MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT "(S.S. 9) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9 shall apply, except as modified herein. a. Determination of Rights (S.S. 9-1 .045) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .045 shall not apply. b. Partial Payments (S.S. 9-1 .06) In lieu of conflicting provisions of the third paragraph of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .06 and the fourth paragraph of S.S. Sec. 11-1 .02, the Agency will withhold 10 percent from any estimated amount due the Contractor. c. Payment of Withheld Funds (S.S. 9-1 .065) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .065 shall not apply. d. Final Payment (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .07) (1 ) Upon satisfactory completion of the entire ►•cork, the Engineer shall recommend the acceptance of the work to the Board of Supervisors. If the Board accepts the completed work, it shall cause a Notice of Completion to be recorded with the County Recorder. (2) Thirty-five (35) days after the filing of the Notice of Completion , the Contractor shall be entitled to the balance due for the completion and acceptance of the work , if he certifies by a sworn written statement that all claims for labor and materials have been paid, and that no claims have been filed with the Agency based upon acts or omissions of the Contractor, and that no liens or withhold notices have been filed against said work or the property on which the ►•cork was done. Payment of the balance due will be made on the day following the regular day for payment of County bills by the County Auditor. e. Adjustment of Overhead Costs (S.S. Sec. 9-1 .08) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .08 shall not apply. R710( 10 • B - 11 . 0OW1 SECTION B - GENERAL PROYISIOUS 10. MEASUREMERT AND PAYMENT (S.S. 9) (Cont.), . f. Clerical Errors' (S.S. 'Sec.: '9-4.,09}. The, prov.isions of -.S.S." Sec. 9 1,09 shall not apply. g. All prior parti`a1' estimates• and "piaymen.ts `shall Abe F' subject to correction ,in .the final .estimate.,and payment. . • 4 . VV• V, I"� ' � ,� B - 12 _.. . ...... .., _.. _ . .... ... _. ... _ a ,.I"'`."�;, SECTION C - FORCE ACCOUNT AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL (S.S. 9-1 .03) The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 shall apply except as modified herein. 1 . DEFINITION. As used here, "force account" means the method of ca cu ating payment for labor, equipment and/or materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for work not included as a bid item in the contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis , compensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03 as modified herein. . ` 2. LABOR. a. The actual ttage5 to be paid, as defined In S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(la) , will be considered to be the prevailing rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such rates. b. Premium wage rates will not be paid for any labor employed in force account work unless such rates have been approved, in writing , by the Engineer. The labor surcharge percentage to be a plied to the actual tinges paid as provided in Section 9-1 .03A(lb� of the Standard Specifications will be 18 percent for all work, except that for the following types of work said labor surcharge will be as shown below: Type of Work Performed Labor Surcharge Percent ' Cleaning and painting metal bridge - - - - - 30 Concrete construction - bridoe - - - - - - - 25 Erection of structural metal for metal bridge, excluding sign bridge - - - - - - - 30 Piledriving , not including cast-in- drilled hole piles - - - -• - - - - - - - - 23 3. EQUIPMENT RENTAL The provisions of S.S. Sec. 9-1 .03A(3) shall apply except as modified herein. a. No payment will be made for idle time due to breakdown , lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work, or other circumstances beyond the control of the Agency. b. Equipment shall be delivered to the extra work site equipped as ordered. c. Idle time waiting for the arrival of trans- .ptrig equipment to move the rented equipment will not be paid fo r. M)053 C - 1 r' SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 1 . MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT Attention is directed to Section 9-1 .015, "Final Pay Quantities," of the Standard Specifications, the prov:lsions of which are applicable to one bid item on this contract. 2. LINES AND GRADES One complete set of stakes for each of the following ` Items will be set by the Engineer after notification by the Contractor as specified in Section 5-1 .07: (a) Construction right of entry boundary and/or drainage easement lines. (b) Line, elevations and points for Installation of rock slope protection. (c) Location of pump discharge line. The Engineer shall be the sole judge of the adequacy ` and sufficiency of the stakes and marks for the purpose for which they are set. If the Contractor requests additional stakes, hubs,- lines, grades or marks other than those set by the Engineer, the cost of labor, equipment and materials required to comply with the Contractor' s request shall be deducted from any monies due or to become due the Contractor. The cost of labor, equipment and materials Involved in resetting stakes destroyed or displaced because of the following reasons, will be deducted from any monies due or to become ;due the Contractor: (a) Negligence in use of construction equipment. (b) Stakes ordered by the Contractor that are not used for a long period of time and are lost in the interim. (c) Poor planning of sequence of operations by the Contractor. D - 1 6• SECTION 0 - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 3. MATERIALS In accordance with the provisions in Section 6-1 .07, "Certificates of Compliance," certificates of compliance wi,il be required for corrugated steel pipe and flexible drain pipe. 4. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING Section 7-1 .09, "Public Safety," of the Standard Specif- ications is modified as follows: All signing and traffic control - warning and safety devices shall conform to the requirements set forth in the current "Manual of Warning Signs, Lights and Devices for Use in Performance of Work Upon County Highways, " issued , by the Public Works Department, Contra Costa County, California. Construction operations shall be performed in such a manner that there will be at least one 12-foot wide traffic lane open to public traffic at all times. In lieu of the conflicting provisions In Section 7-1 .08, "Public Convenience, " and 7-1 .09, "Public Safety, " of the Standard Specifications, the Contractor shalt bear the entire cost of furnishing, (except the sign shown on the plans to be County-furnished) installing, maintaining and removing all signs ( including the County-furnished sign) , lights, flares, barricades and other warning and safety devices. The sign shown on the plans to be furnished by ,the County, together with a 4" x 4" wood post, galvanized carriage bolts and bracket for assembly shall be picked up by the Contractor at the' County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue between Marina Vista and Pacheco Boulevard in Martinez. ":he Contractor shall notify the Engineer at least one ( 1 ) working day in advance of the time he proposes to pick up the sign, post and fasteners. The sign shall be erected and covered with burlap prior to commencing any other work on the contract. Covering shall be removed immediately preceding the start of work when directed by the Engineer. The wood post shall be securely set a minimum of 2' - 6" in the ground and shall be located so that the attached sign is at least two feet clear of the edge of pavement. The sign shall be placed on the post to provide a seven-foot clearance between the sign and the ground surface. Exceptions to the location provisions of this para- graph shall only be on the written approval of the Engineer. D - 2 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 4. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE, PUBLIC SAFETY AND SIGNING (Cont. ) Upon completion of the project and at a time directed by the Engineer, the sign shall be taken down and dismantled; and the County-furnished sign and post shall be delivered to the County Maintenance Yard Sign Shop on Shell Avenue. Full compensation for conforming to the provisions in Section 7 of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions, Including full compensation for furnishing all labor, including flagmen, mate-ials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and for installing, maintaining and removing all signs, lights and barricades as shown on the plans, as specified herein, and as directed by the Engineer, in- cluding picking up, hauling and returning the County-furnished sign and post, shall be contidered as included in various contract items of work and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. The replacement cost of all County-furnished material lost or damaged between the time it is removed from and returned to the Shell Avenue Maintenance Yard Sign Shop shall be borne by the Contractor and may be deducted from any monies due or to become due to the Contractor under the contract. 5. REMOVE DRAINAGE FACILITIES Full compensation for furnishing labor, equipment, tools and Incidentals and doing all the work involved in removing and salvaging all drainage facilities as shown on the plans shall be considered as included in the contract lump sum price paid for "Remove Drainage Facilities," and no separate payment will be allowed therefor. 6. GRADING OF SLIDE AREA As directed by the Engineer, and as specified in this special provision , the slide area shall be graded and reshaped . Grading and reshaping shall be such that all visible cracks will be obliterated and the slide area will be sloped to drain. Grading and reshaping shall only be done within the limits specified by the Engineer. Grading and reshaping of the slide area as -ordered by the Engineer will be paid for as Extra Work as provided for in contract Item #7 and in Section 4-1 .03D, "Extra Work," of the Standard Specifications. D - 3 OOVV IL } SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 7. CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE The contract unit price paid per linear foot for 8" Corrugated Steel Pipe, 0.064" Thick, shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, equipment including coupling bands, elbows and neoprene sleeves,the connection assemblies, all necessary excavation and backfill , and for doing all the `work Involved in installing the 8" CSP as shown on the plans and as herein specified and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. The contract unit price `or "Modify Pipe Anchors," shall Include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and equipment, and for doing all work necessary to modify the existing pipe anchors as shown on the plans and no separate payment will be allowed therefor. 8. FLEXIBLE DRAIN PIPE Flexible drain pipe shall be 4" diameter ADS (Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. ) non-perforated or approved equal . Full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials., tools, and equipment for installing the 411flexible drain pipes as shown on the plans, including the connection assembly to the existing 2-1 /2 inch P. Y.C. discharge line shall be considered as included In the contract price paid per linear foot of 114" Flexible Drain Pipe" and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. 9. SLOPE PROTECTION Rock slope protection shall conform to the provisions In Section 72, "Slope Protection," of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. Rock slope protection shall be placed in conformance with the requirements for Method B placement with facing class of material . . The Contract price paid per ton for "Rock Slope Protection (Method B, Facing)" shall Include full compensation for excavation and conform grading required to install the slope protection and to build the cuff-off wall , all necessary labor, materials, tools, equip- ment, and incidentals required to construct the rock slope protection as shown on the plans, as specified in the Standard Specifications and these special provisions, and no separate payment will be allowed therefor. i 5 ,f D - 4 O0057 SECTION D - CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 10. EROSION CONTROL Erosion control shall be instituted on areas which have been graded by the Contractor within the slide area or at locations directed by the Engineer and shall conform to the provisions in Section 20 of the Standard Specifications and these special provisions. The work, as specified below, shall be performed when directed by the Engineer using materials, equipment and application methods approved by him prior to commencement of the work. Erosion control areas shall not be cultivated or treated with weed control chemicals; and the placement of straw or topsoil shall not be required. Erosion control slurry shall be nozzle applied uniformly on the designated areas within four hours of mixing and shall consist of the following materials: a. Mulch shall be a green colored, fibrous, wood cellulose material containing no growth or germination inhibiting factors, and shall be applied at the rate of 35 lbs. per 1000 square feet ( 1 ,500 lbs per acre) slope measure. b. Commercial fertilizer shall be a controlled release type with an analysis of : Nitrogen 16%, Phosphoric Acid 7%, Water Soluble Potash 12%, Combined sulfur 6%, Iron 2%. A small fraction of uncoated soluble fertilizer shall be included for fast green-up. The fertilizer shall be applied at the rate of 15 lbs. per 1 ,000 square feet (645 lbs. per acre) slope measure. c. Seed shall conform to the provisions of the California Agricultural Code and the Federal Seed Act and shall consist of the following types and application rates per 1 ,000 square feet slope measure: Bromus (Blando Bromegrass) 5 lbs/1000 sq. ft. d. Water shall not contain weed seeds and shall be of'' such quality that it will promote germination and, growth of seeds. Payment for erosion control will be made at the contract unit price paid per square foot, which shall include full compensation for furnishing all labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to apply all mulch, fertilizer, seed and water which will insure estab- lishment of the required vegetative coverage. 0 - 5 ��058 FT- + aa: _ a : . ... A62C-7 v „• x a zs �, 3Sts = ! WE us •. � t •_ �y. � .=!'t,5lli• � :�j` / L � Q Mme ,may � Y III ri tt1 M L �\�� f� �\� `�' 7 4 � �� .--1 ;>,\:tea�, +-► 4:1 r r f+ . a _1 ztr o f z .fi M Z $• .• $ liar O P C`V? 6`ur =• � : w s r d $ 11 z , r•� ,�' ��}3^ n s � i �o �� CG e+a� 8 d'. '►R 's �w � � ��`~ a � t i= ,Sr N 1�', iy y V {d js �r P< 6 w st� " i,7.} L3 • •,:+ i�T,a � * � �' a�� ate' .=``.i 51}+� ��f3 ZTr � 3 Z 00- 059 SO y Datil \-r 537-:. ! F� sMET �;.Js s• «. � [ � j;yZ S- � ' a a� 7� :�►a `o - i y pp jM a u 3$ fid•-` S fi nz J� ger o�•Op =� Sf e $e.� =b P •SPSr - ZZ, W ++ af i '(.�• � zo �� N A A r • V •� ' UUas - acDk -jm s ; z• d i= as S € .� ' as o w a n �, t , All CD • Gipa� r U � i P �a1� s, .. i _ apt a . UP 013 01 wv a } w�A.w A Q w I• e n�.¢O! • �`�--' qac►-! p� 3 � m . '" iii �tST•o3 � � a r7.Mew w+"..i iy• j t ' 75 .t�� N , o }'W °' p N J ZEDN Z I2 1 ee..'' it N 3 V 2? W � ��Q W� M 01 1 Z rn WO a tJUL 4 4 i CO a=z-,<cE z W Z 14 0 .. u x oc c Z. , WMa-' a W J ~Q 0 ,1 W LL. LL. QQWto 00 - � V F LL Q N w V/W � Ix W V I 3 m Q E- Q p Z W N tV UJ ( ) LLQ u I.- �v a Z y, Z G J (� Z0 � t1. i-3,,.`�1{{ a N — Q Q F- Q - 4 Z QOWQFuj QQ . S N N = m Z M�� H N in W g i a 2 D W F' V Q W Y�'•'' N m Q 1 0! Na Y N Z N m Q Z� 'V^ c o'n cc 0 V O V OJ VI ,l, Z!ti ¢ W W .�W - V^^� //Q/�/�� -1 r�� Q OW OJ N -Z U) Q ✓ W C310. swY J >- W W ? a N iota%59 �< Z ~ YW } W }; W V � � � S -f U) > ~ W Z C) W W x Z � W J Q 3 Y N v~i O Z Qt/) p � z } W N i LL. M.. d � QNU Nm C m W - i- Z t ,wQ w J ZO CC Z lot nw, W Jw&.- CC0 Q � J CL� -J U) J� GW VJ vi N = W ZZN QW ` tea a FW Oo •J f Ix Og � nN 191 � mU. o �� - Q ( !Y Q W 1- M !! w - 0 a z z �,.. Ax 0 — N z �J Z ! 'Ova W W. to W M W a 1 Y3 w . 0 H CL ' a Y W f OW W Q QQ Q J a a{�9N H N Q a `Z V W u) O W N _ z IL Iw o H W m0 z 0 N z ti jF y Z O O O a �N d Y J W Q ;x Z wFQ W 3 oN U U. o r 3w aw a u a �J � av a 00061 - . AVENIUA MARTINEZ PROJECT %0. 1375-5835-75 BIDS DUE SEPTE14BER 239 1975 AT 11 O'CLUCK A.A. ROOM 1031p COFINTY AnMfj0rTM"TTnr- r S B AVENI DA MARTINEZ PROJECT We 1375-5835-75 BIDS DUE SEPTEMBER 23+ 1975 AT 11 O'CLUCK l&Ae ROOM 1039 COUNTY ADMIAISTRATION BUILDING* 651 PI::E STREET. MAkT I AEZ s CAL I F0kh IA 94553 TO THE P.OARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ9 CALIFORNIA P R O P O S A L FOR AVENIDA MARTINEZ SLIDE REPAIR 4M75 am BOARD OF . NAME OF BIDDER -------------r---r---------- BUSINESS ADDRESS —----------------------- PLACE OF RESIDENCE ------------------------ TO ---- ------TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORRRS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY — THE UNDERSIGNED9 AS BIDDER* DECLARES THAT THE ONLY PERSONS OR PARTIES INTERESTED IN THIS PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE THOSE !DAMMED HEREIN— THAT THIS PROPOSAL IS .BADE w I THOUT COLLUSION 'r:I TH ANY OTHER PERSON s F-IRMS OR CORPORATION;— THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF TtiE PRO— POSED WORK. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS— AND HE PROPOSES AND AGREESr. IF THIS PROPOSAL 1S ACCEPTED. THAT HE MILL CONTRACT 'WITH THE COUNTY OF CURTKA COSTA TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY MACHINiERY, TOOLS. APPARATUS AhD OTmER MEANS OF CONSTRUCTION* AND TO CO ALL THE WORK AND FURNISH ALL THE MATERIALS SPECIFIED IN TtfE CONTRACT s IN THE MANNER AyD TIME PRESCR I BED s AND ACCLRD— ING 10 THE REOUIREMEM7S OF TtiE ENGINEER AS THEREIN SET FORTH+ AND THAT HE WILL TAKE IN: FULL PAYMENIT ThEREFOR AN At-iOUi%T BASED Ott THE WiIT PRICES SPLCIFIED HEREINECLOW FOR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF 'xORK. THE TOTAL VALUE OF SAID WORK AS ESTIMATED HEREIN BEING S r----------------r-- ( INSERT - ( I.BSERT TOTAL) AND TILE FOLLOWING BEING TtiE U.iIT PRICES DID9 TO wIT— VIIIIVF+. Microfilmed with board order — 1 . ,. PRUPUSAL (CONT. ) (PRICE NOT Tu EXCEED ThRLL (3) GEC IP-ALS) • ITEM TUTAL ITLM LST It ATLP UNIT OF PRICE( IP. ( Ih N0. OUAnTITY MEASURE ITEM FIGURES) FIGURES) 1 LS REMOVE DRAINAGE FACILITIES 2 is LF 8—I)d. CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE 10.064—Ih. THICK) ----------------------------------------------------------- ------- -------- 3 96 LF 4—IN. FLEXIBLE DRAIN PIPE ----------------—..-------------------— ----------------- ------- 4 4 EA MODIFY PIPE ANCHORS ------ ------------------------------------ ------------------- 5 ------- ---5 350 TON ROCK SLOPE PROTEC— TION (METHOD B+ FACING) - ------------------------------- 6 10+000 SOFT EROSION CONTROL (F) 7 S SUPPLEMENTAL WORK 5.00 (GRADING AT SLIDE AREA) CONTINGENT SUMi PAID AS EARNED ------------------------ NOTE—PLEASE --- .NOTE—PLEASE SHOW TOTAL ON PAGE P-1 TOTAL --------------------------------- --- P --P — 2 . 4 PRGPOSAL (COliT. ) ---------------- IN CASE OF A DISCREPANCY RFT nEEN UNIT PRICES AND TOTALS 9 THE UY I T _ PRICES SHALL PREVAIL. IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE UUAXT I T I ES OF hORK UNDER EACH ITEM ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY* BEING GIVEN FOR A BASIS OF COMPARISON OF PROPOSAL. AND THE RIGHT IS RESERVED TO THE COUr)TY TO INCREASE OR DE— CREASE THF AMOUNT OF WORK UNDER ANY ITEM AS MAY BE REQUIRED9 IN ACCORD— ANCE' WITH PROVISIONS SET FORTH IN ThE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF MONEY SI'T FORTH FOR EACH ITEM OF WORK OR AS THE TOTAL AMOUNT BID FOR THE: PROJECT 9 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN AGREEMENT TO PAY A LUMP SUN FOR THE WORK UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY SO STATES. IT IS HEREBY AGREED THAT THE UNDERSIGNED. AS BIDDERS SHALL FURNISH A LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND IN AN A14OUNT EQUAL TO FIFTY PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMCUNT OF THIS PROPOSAL AND A FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND TO BE ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THIS PROPOSAL. TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA AND AT NO EXPENSE TO SAID COUNTY 9 EXECUTED BY A RESPONS— IBLE SURETY ACCEPTABLE TO SAID COUNTY, IN THE EVENT THAT THIS PROPOSAL 1S ACCEPTED BY SAID COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA. IF THIS PROPOSAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED AND THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL FAIL TO CONTRACT AS AFORESAID AND TO GIVE THE TWO BC:.OS IN THE SUNS TO BE DETERMINED AS AFORESAID. WITH SURETY SATISFACTORY TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 9 i4 TH I N SEVEN (7) DAYS 9 NOT I NCLUD I P:G SUWAYS• AFTER THE BIDDER HAS RECEIVED nOT I CE FROM THE BOARD OF SUPERV I S02S THAT TI IE CDN— TRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE• THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS :SAY, AT ITS OPTION, DETERMIAE THAT THE BIDDER HAS ABANDONED THE CONTRACTS AND THLRE:UPON THIS PROPOSAL AND THE ACCEPTAUCC THERE::F' SHALL BE tsULL A;:D VU I D AND THE F VRFE I TURE OF SUCH SECURITY ACCO::PA::Y I::G THIS PH-.0PCSAL SHALL OPERATE AND THE SAKE SHALL BE THE PROPERTY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COS'A. SUBCONTRACTS THE CONTRACTOR AGREES+ BY SUBMISSIOn OF THIS PROPOSAL TO CON— FORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 4100 THROUGH 4113 OF THE G'.NtR�s-MENT CODE PER T A M I NG TO SURCONTRAC TORS, THE SAME AS IF i::CORPOItiATED HE tiE I N. A CUFPLETF. LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS IS REOU I RED s AND ThE BIDDER in I LL BE EXPECTED TO PERFORM ::ITN 11IS OvIN FORCES• ALL ITE:iS OF W%'O'RK FOR irHICH NO SUBCONTRACTOR IS LISTEbs THE FOLLC A?NG IS A CUPPLETE LIST OF ITEVS OF 'WORK TO BE SUL— CONIRACTED OX THIS PROJECT. IF A P:iRTIC"N OF ANY ITE,'-'& :F &URK IS DONE BY A SUBCONTRACTOR• THE VALUE OF THE WORK SUBCONTRACTED ::ILL BE BASED ON THE CST I MATED COST OF SUCH PORTION' OF THE C^v:TRACT I TE::9 D£TE.R.o I hED FRUA; INFORMATION SUB:GITTED BY THE CCRTRACTCRs SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY TiIE ENGINEER. THE U%DERS I GNED s AS B I CCER• DECLARES TfIAT HE HAS :SVT ACCEPTED ANY HID FROM ANY SUBCG%TRACTOR OR ::ATER I AL".A1 THROUGH ANY DID DEPCS I TORY q THE RY LA-..'Ss RULES UR I:EGULATIC45. OF b.31101 PRUf—llilT ::Z THE C::::— TRACTOR FROM CONS I UR I UG A:iY !'.ID FRC�. A..Y Sut3C0:1T:t;.CT;;'2 Jct MATER IAL.MAN. wiilCH IS NOT PROCESSED THROUG11 SAID ELIC DEPOSITORY. OR rHIC11 PREVE::T A::Y SU11CONTRACTOR OR -VATER1, L:SA.`I FROV ::ICDI!%G TO ANY COft;TRACTOR 010 DOES NOT UGC TIIE FACILITIES OF OR ACCE13T BIDS FRU:i UR TfINJUG11 SUCH BIC DEI'G:S I TORY. J 04k-a- PROPOSAL (CONI . ) ---------------- NO. ITE.: SUBCONTRACTOR ADDRESS ACC004:PA4NY I S G THIS PRv:'.^.SAL IS A PROPOSAL GLARAIN'TY I Ed THE AMOUNT Oi - TEN (I0) PERCENT OF AMOUNT BIG -------------------------------------------------------------- (CASHIER'S ChECKs CERTIFIED CHECK OR BIDDER'S BOND ACCEPTABLE) THE NAMES OF ALL PERSONS INTERESTED Its THE FOREGOING PROPOSAL AS PRINCIPALS ARE AS FOLLOiS— IMPORTANT NOTICE ---------------- F THE- BIDDER OR OTHER INTERESTED PERSON IS A CORPORATION P STATE LEGAL NA::E OF CORPJRATIO";. ALSO NAMES OF PRESIDENT+ SECRETARY* TREASURER% AND NANAGER1 T[iEREUF• IF A COPARTNERSHIP* STATE TRUE f:AV.E OF FIRM* IF BIDDER OR OTHER 1;:TERESTED PERSON IS AN 14DIVIDUALs STATE FIRST AND LAST NAME IN FULL. ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- LICENSL.^• TO OG OR SL't3COINTRACT ALL CLASSES O 40"RK INVOLVED I N Ti C PR0JE CT , i N ACC:.RDAXCE I Tit AN ACT P R 0 V I I:iG FOR T H L 14E,G 15TRA— T I v4 OF CONTR ACTORRS s LICENSE (CLASS— ) . -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- (S1G,:AT=E Cf O'anf.Cn BUS14NE55 ADGNESS ------------------------------------------------------ PLACE CF RESIDE%%. ---------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- P — 4 ................. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Re: Conveying Excess Contra ) Costa County Property to the ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/693 State of California for Franklin ) (S & H Code Sec. 960.4) Canyon Road widening-Work Order ) No. 4$05 ) The hoard of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: The State Department of Transportation had requested that the County of Contra Costa accept by dedication from Collier Carbon and Chemical Corporation certain land needed for the widening of Franklin Canyon Road prior to the issuance of an encroachment permit by the State for a driveway entrance Therefore, on June 3, 1975, the Board of Supervisors accepted the deed from Collier Carbon and Chemical Corporation to Contra Costa County recorded June 13, 1975, in' Book 7536, page 77 of the Official Records of Contra Costa County for road purposes. The State now requests that the County transfer title to the State for widening of Franklin Canyon Road adjacent to existing State Highway 4, and for issuance of an encroachment permit for a driveway entrance to said State highway. This Board hereby DETER14INES A14D FINDS that said property is not needed or necessary for County purposes and Board further finds that such conveyance is in the public interest and categorically exempt from the Environmental Impact Report requirements. The Board hereby APPROVES the conveyance of said property, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 960.4, and the Chair- man of this Board is AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED to execute a deed on behalf of the County to the State of California, for the property described in the above-mentioned deed to the County (75361 OR 77) . The Clerk of this Board is DIRECTED to cause said deed to be delivered to the State of California for acceptance and recording: PASSED on September 2, 1975, unanimously by Supervisors present. cc: County Administrator County Auditor-Controller County Assessor Public Works Director Sr.': ;p RESOLi1TIO : :10. 75693 000Ito M '4 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Abandonment of ) - a portion of Campo Calle Road ) RESOLUTI0N N0. 75/694 between Quandt Road and ) Pleasant Hill Road ) Date: Se gg (Lafayette area). ) Resolution & NotleF of In ention To Abandon County Road (S.& H. Code 6§956.8, 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Court RESOLVES .THAT: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code it declares its intention to abandon the hereinafter described County Road. October 21 1975 at 2A a.m. It fixes Tuesday, � (or as continued) in its Chambers_. Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing evidence offered by any interested party as to whether this road is unnecessary for present or prospective public use. This matter is referred to the Planning Commission for report before the hearing. The County Clerk shall have notice of this matter (1) published in the , a newspaper of general circulation published In this County wh c is designated as the newspaper most likely to give notice to persons interested in the proposed abandonment, for at least two successive weeks before the hearing, and (2) posted conspicuously along the line of this road at least two weeks before the hearing. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A: attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. VJW:bw (Res. & Not . Aband.) (CC-71:250:8/72) RESOLUTION NO. 75/694 00067 t Campo Calle +, Road No. .3655AA EXHIBIT "A" July 7, 1975 ROAD ABANDOME?,T Portion of the Rancho Canada Del Hambre described as follows: Beginning on the southwesterly line of the County road known as Campo Calle, at the most north,-i-ly corner of Lot 4 as said lot is shorn on the map entitled "Tract 2447, southerly portion of Rancho Canada Del Hambre, Contra Costa County, California," filed December 12, 1956 in Book 66 of Maps, at page 6, Records of ; Contra Costa County, California; thence, from said point of beginning, along said southwesterly line of Campo Calle: ?Forth 240 59' 47" Nest, '154.85 feet; thence, northwesterly along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 275.00 feet, through a central angle of 130 54' 0011, an arc distance of 66.72 feet; thence, tangent to said curve North 380 S3' 47" {fest, 107.29 feet; thence, northwesterly along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 25.00 feet, through a central angle of 490 241 0011, an arc distance of 21.55 feet; thence, tan- gent to said curve North 880 17' 47" hest, 21.64 feet to a point on the easterly- line asterlyline of Pleasant bill Road, from which a radial line of a non-tangent curve to the left having a radius of 525.00 feet, bears North 730 52' 15" West; thence, leaving- said southwesterly line of Campo Calle northeasterly along said easterly line and curve, through a central angle of 30 58' 5411, an arc distance of 36.48 feet;- thence, eet;thence, South 890 S9' 44" East, 18.00 feet; thence, North 280 '33, 31" East, 14.64 feet to a point on the northeasterly line of said Campo Calle, from which " a radial line of a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 75.00 feet, bears South 90 S9' 4S" West; thence, along said northeasterly line: southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 410 06' 2811, an arc distance of 53.81 feet; thence, tangent to said curve South 380 53' 47" East, 107.29 feet; thence, southeasterly along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 325.00 feet, through a central angle of 130 54' 001 , an arc distance of 78.85 feet; thence, tangent to said curve South 240 S9' 47" East, 464.85 feet; thence, southeasterly along a tangent curve to the left, having•a radius of 275.00 feet, through a central angle of 220 54' 1011, an arc distance of 109.93 feet to a point of cusp from which a radial line of a non-tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 180.00 feet bears South 240 42' 4111f;thence, leaving said northeasterly'line of Campo Calle, westerly along said curve, through a central angle of 490 43' I511, an arc distance of 156.20 feet to a point of cusp on the northerly line of Quandt Road; thence, tangent to said curve North 640 59' 26" East, 22.25 feet; thence, northeasterly along a tangent curve to the left, having a radius of 43.42 feet, through a central angle of 890 59' 1311, and arc distance of 68.19 feet to said southwesterly line of Campo Calle; thence, tangent to said curve, along said southwesterly line North 240 59' 47" {rest, 310.00 feet to the point of beginning. Bearings used in the above description are based on the California Coordinate System Zone III. lwm BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY September 2, .1975 Re: Sale of County Owned Property ) at 1000 Sanders Drive, Moraga - ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/695 Work Order 4242 ) (Gov. Code Sec,. 25535)_ The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: This Board by Resolution No. 75/514 dated June 30, 1975 declared its intention to sell the real property described in the Notice of Intention to sell Real Property incorporated therein, and in the Notice of Public Land Sale referred. to therein, under the terms and conditions contained in said notices Said notices set Saturday, August 16, 1975 at 11:00 a.m. at property site, 1000 Sanders Drive, Moraga, California as the time and place where sealed proposals and auction bids would be received and considered. The highest bid received by the Real Property Agent at that time was $52,355.00 from Clark Ransome together with a $2,000.00 option-bid deposit, in accordance with the approved terms and conditions set forth in the above-mentioned Notice. Said bid is hereby finally accepted. The Chairman of this Board is hereby authorized and directed to execute a deed for the property and cause the same to be delivered upon performance and compliance by the purchasers of all the terms or conditions of their contract to be performed concurrently therewith. PASSED on September 2, 1975 by this Board. SM/3 cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller Assessor Public Works (2) RESOLUTION NO. 75/695 00 ` IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approval of ) the clap of Subdivision 4444, ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/696 Walnut Creek Area. ) WI EREAS the following documents having been presented for Board approval this date: A map entitled Subdivision 4444, property located in the Walnut Creek Area, said map having been certified by the proper officials; A subdivision agreement with C. Gene Crowell, 25 El Mirador, Walnut 'Creek, CA 94596, subdivider, wherein said subdivider agrees to complete road and street improvements, etc., in said subdivision within one year from the date of said agreement; WHEREAS said documents having been accompanied by the following: Security to guarantee the completion of road and street improvementsasrequired by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: a. Surety Bonds (No. SC 62759 43) issued by Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies, with C. Gene Crowell as principal, in the amount of $43,900.00 for Faithful Performance and $44,400.00 for Labor and Materials; b. Cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 128609, dated August 20, 1975), in the amount of $500.00. Name: Crowell Construc- tion Company, Address: 25 E1 Mirador, Walnut Creek, CA 94596. Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map, and that the 1974-75 tax lien has been paid in full, and the 1975-76 tax lien, which became.a lien on the first day of March 1975, is estimated to be $3,000.00; Security to guarantee the payment of taxes as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code as follows: Cash Bonds in the amount of $3,000.00 guaranteeing the payment of estimated 1975-76 tax (Auditor's Deposit Permit Detail No. 128584, dated 8-20-75). NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that said map be and the same is hereby APPROVED and this Board does not accept or reject on behalf of the public any of the streets, paths, or easements shown thereon as dedicated to public use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said subdivision agreement be and the same is hereby APPROI►ED and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to execute said agreement and appropriate extensions thereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED on September 2, 1975• cc: Subdivider County Auditor-Controller Public Vorks Director Tax Collector's Office RESOLUTION NO. 75/696 r1n070 , .. , t .... Stlf:D_j,;SrOR �1GREEi►IE.\'f - -� (§I) Subdivision: 4444 . ;. . $ ?. Code §§11611-12) (§l) Subdivider: _C, GENE CROWELL 31) Effective Date: (51) Cc»pletion Period: One year . (94) Deposits: A. (cash) $500 B. (bonds, etc:) 1. (faithful performance - . maintenance) $ .43-900.00 2. (labor $ materials)$ 44,400.00 1. PARTIES 6 DATE. Effective on the above date, the"County of Contra Costa, California, hereinafter called "County", and the abovenamed Subdivider, mutually promise and agree as follows concerning this subdivision: - 2. IMPROVEEMUTS. Subdivider shall construct, install and complete road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, fire hydrants, and all improvements as zequtred by the County Ordinance Coca, especially Title 9, and including future amendments. and all improvements required in the approved improvement plan of this subdivision on file in the County's Public Works Department. Subdivider shall complete this work and improvements (hereinafter called "work") within the above completion period from date hereof as required by the California Subdivision Miap Act (Business & Professions Code §§11500 and following), in a good work- manliko manner, in accordance with accepted construction practices and in a manner equal or superior to the requirements of the County Ordinance Code and rulings made thereunder; and where there is a conflict between the improvement plan and the County Ordinance Code, the stricter requirements shall govern. 3. G:;AMNTEE 54 `:AI TELE \CE. Subdivider guarantees that the work is and will be rce froom; refects and will perform satisfactorily in accordance with Artiale 94-4.4 of the Count%• Ordinance Code; and he shall maintain it for one year after its completion and acceptance against any defective worl.••�..azship or materials or any unsatisfactory performance. 4. IMPROVENIE\i SECURITY: DEPOSIT € BOA•DS. Upon executing this Agreement, Subdivider shall, pursuant to Business F Professions Code §11612, deposit as security with the County: A. Cash: $S00 cash; and.... B. Bonds, etc.: (1 - faithful performance $ maintenance) additional Security for at 'Least the ab%)ve-specif led amo'ult, which is the total estimated cost ofthe work less $500, in the form of a cash deposit, a certified or cashier's check, or an acceptable corporate surety bona, guaranteeing his faithful performance of this agrez-ent and :rain:.e--an ,e =2 the vori: for one year after completion and acceptance t1hereof aga--nst an defecti a t.orkmanshii or materials or any unsatisfactory performance; plus (2- labor F, materials) another such additional security in at least the above-specified anount, which is the full amount of said estir�-cted cost, securing payment to the contractor, ti his subco;.trvictors, and to persons renting equipment or :-urnishing labor or materials to then or to the Subdivider. S. WjXR.R•Lj'TY. Subdivider warrants that said improvement plan is adequate to accomplish this cork as pronised in Sect=nn 2; ars if, at any tire before the Cou-nty's resolution cof corpletior. for the subdirision, the improveteent plan probes to be inaacciva to in any respect, Subdivider shall nake charges necessary to accomplish the wort'. as promised. • - I - .....-..��_._ ...._.�.n... ' 6• h'0 iti'AIVER BY-COUNTY. Inspection of •.ork and/or materials inspected, or statement by the ny offwork icer agent nt a s' or approval. . Via Cuunty indicating the work or an employee' agree.;.ent, or acceptance of the whole part complies with the requirements of this Vayn-enrs therefor. or any combination or all of rhes actspazt of Said ,shall not• relievcls, or Or his obligation to fu1f.�.11 thin rnntrart -•� nr hese, a. . Subdivider. 6. AO WAIVER BY COUNTY. Inspection of the work and/or materials, or approval _,' ..ork and/or materials inspected, or statement by any officer, agent or employee•of t.'e�! CL��nt;• indica:.1 the work or any part thereof complies with the requirements of tliis A!-reemcnt, or acceptance of the: thole or any part of said work and/or materials, or payments therefor, or any combination or all of these_ acts, shall not relieve the Subdivider or his obligation to fulfill t;,is contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped f:om bringing any actian for damages arising• from the failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 7. IMOLNITY. Subdivider shall hold harmless and indemnify the indemnitees from the liabilities as defined in this section: A. The indemnitees benefited and protected by this promise are the County, and its special districts, elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents and employees. B. The liabilities protected against are any liability or claim for damage of any kind allegedly suffered, incurred or threatened because of actions defined below, and including personal injury, death, property damage, inverse condemnation, or any combination of these, and regardless of whether or not such liability, claim or damage was unforeseeable at any time before the County approved the improvement plan or accepted the improvements as completed, and including the defense of any suit(s), action(s) or other proceedings) concerning these. - C. The actions causing liability are any act or omission (negligent or non-negligent) in connection with the matters covered by this Agreement and attributable to the Subdivider, contractor, subcontractor, or any officer, agent or employee of one or more of them. D. Non-Conditions: The promise and agreement in this section is not conditioned or dependent on whether or not any Indemnitee has prepared, supplied, or approved any plan(s) or specification(s) in connection with this work or subdivision, or has insurance or other indemnification covering any of these matters, or that the alleged dzLmage resulted partly from any negligent or willful misconduct of any Indemnitee- B. COSTS. Subdivider shall pay when due, all the costs of the work, including inspections thereof and relocating existing utilities required thereby. 9. SURVEYS. Subdivider shall set and establish survey monuments in accordance with the filed reap and to the satisfaction of the County Road Commissioner-Surveyor. 10. NO\PEFFOcPMAU\CE AND COSTS. If Subdivider fails to complete the work and improvements within the time specified in this Agreement or extensions granted, County may proceed to complete them by contract or otherwise, and Subdivider shall pay the costs and charges therefor iurz.;diately upon demand. If County sues to compel performance of this .%,rr Ce«+ezt— or re:..''vcx* the cost of corp:e ing the improvements, Sdodiv ides sial l pay all reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of suit, and all other expenses of litigation incurred by County in connection therewith. li. ASSIG%NIE.%T. If before County accepts these improvements, the subdivision is annexed to a city, the County may assign to that city the County's rights under this Agreement and!or any deposit or bond securing then. 00072 2 - 12. RECORD MP. In consideration hereof, County shall allow Subdivider .:a file and record the _nal nap for said Subdivision. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY VICTOR W. $AUER, Public Works Director By ! Chief Deputy FubliiY Warks hector CONTRA COSUP, COUNTY SUBDIVIDER: (See note below) C By xx,�axxi�cx+�c_�aesrci�ors 1 ,` J ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk €, (Designate official capacity in-tlie usiress) ex officio Clerk of the Board Note to Subdivider: (1) Execute acknowledgment By� YC� 0�� form: below; and 2) If a corporation, affix Deputy corporate seal. FORM APPROVED: J014"N B. CLAUSE\ County Counsel r-- Deputy (CORPOMTE SEAL) State of CaI'yfornia ) ss. (Acknowledgment by Corporation, Partnership County o f �...ri!�a tos i°`i l or Individual) On , mac �, Sl L�j� /S�7Y the person(s) whose name(s) is/are signed above for Subdivider and who is known to me to be the individual and officer or partner as stated _ -above _ _ this ias:..�u;:.er.:., persai:..l_y appaared before me and acknowledged to :mc that 11e executed it and that the corporation or partnership named above executed it. (NOTARIAL SEAL) f Notary Public for said County and State (Subd-v. Agrmt. CCC Std. Form) M*73 a.mrnrnumtmn�rr-.rrrnne.r.,.:rrss•- (LD-9- Rev. 3/74) - 0MCIAL SEAL CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ` Sty C.^aaei::r+s iel:rx 11».•3u".F3:1 �• .7 �. QtliiiMq�iR�li .[J�u'•.r'.::i�s.3iirinl.IXi.!w:w.�t .. . EDWARD W.LEAL ALFRED P.LOMELI Cou:.ty Treasurer-Tax Collector Assistant County Treasurer- TAX COLLECTOR'S OFFICE Tax to lector / DQ9 and ya6le of Taxes CONTRA COSTA COUNTY int I �l ent of rase, Du•oad PayalLle Delinquent on the First Day of Nave%-&Or "on the Tooth Day of December ------------- MARTINEZ.CAWFORNIA ------ S.c4nd Installment of Taxes Phone''28 3000.Fzt.2385 Second Instalment of Taxes Due and Payable Delinquent an the First Day of Febtaary Jule 25, 1975 - an the Tenth Day of April IF THIS TRACT IS NOT FILED BY OCTOBER 31, 1975 , SIS LETM is VOID, This will certify that I have examined the map of the proposed subdivision entitled: Kaci• NO. 1,444 and have determined from the official tax records that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in the map. The current� _ tax lien has been paid in fall. Our estimate of the tax lien, Which became a lien on the first day of March, 1975 is $3.000.00 EDWARD W. Tax Collecto BY: 1/ dl 0,0074 PAYMENT BOND—PUBLIC WORKS Bold No. Or–SC-627-59-4-3 ® FIREMAN'S /u1sMAN's FUND INsuRANCL CONPANV it.s ANIMCAN tNSURANCs.cost►ANr •� NATIONAL SUe FIND siv COttb1b.T1eN AssOCtATLO u•ow•u"CORPOOAT•ON AMERICAN AUVOMOe1LC WSURANC9 CONVA/tr t K S U R A C E C%h k t'A%t L S MOMC OF/ICs SAN swMKtseo,CALIFORNIA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That wa C. GENE CROWELL as Priadpci. and FIREHANIS FUND INSURANCE COMPANY ,iaoorpoated under the laws of the State of CALIFORNIA : and authorimed to execute bads and undue as sole surety. as Surety. are held and finafy bound unto any cod all pe mons named : in California Civil Code Section 3181 wbose claim has not been paid by the eaaKadoc, company or corporation, in the aggregate. total of FORTY–FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NO/100 – – – – – – – – – �- – – – – – – – – - DAms.($449400.00 �I . for the payment whereat well and emly to be mode. said Psindpal and Surety bind themselves.their bels;admfnfstoatats,.'stussmsors: and assign& jointly and severally. finely by these pressaft The Condition of the foregoing obhgodoh is such dro* whereas the above bounden Pdndpal hem sotsred.into a convect,dated . 19 - with due COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA to do the following work to-wit SUED IV IS ION IMPROVEMENTS TRACT 1if144 Haw. Therefore. if the obave bounden Pfindpal, eoeteector penton. aompaay or cotymadom at bus cc its sub-aonhador.fabs to pay. any claimant n=ed in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the State of Califarnfa. or amounts due under the Unempblumiat.hamance Code. with respect to wank or labor perkrmed by any such claimant, that, the Surety an chis bond wM pay the soma, in an.amouist : not exceeding 12he aggregate sum specified to this bond, and also, in ease suit is brought upon dit bond,a reasonable attarnsy's fee, --''-L '1 be aw¢ded by the court to the prevailing party is said suit said a llammoYs he to be tmosd as costs in said suit: shall inure to the benefit of any pessest named in Section 3181 of the Civil Code of the Stade of Callfarnfa mar as to give a actioto thea! as @:eir assignees in any suet brought upon this toad .ei is exe=ted and filed to comply with the provisions a., :he act of Legiststnae of the Stme of CaUfomia as ctw*. rod fa ., L._I- s 3::'-33:emd..U3AV0.orzd C:l a:nenlCienta dmmdo. nd Seared this 22ND day of AUGUST -1975 . C. 7HRRE CROWELL opal ,Flftt= NIS FUND INSURANCE rMU.' Surety sy �� OF role�rL ' Marga JAetorr. i-'Face < ' . D , �, • t �. aMlIO7ARtA4ACKNOWLEDGMEINT1►fTORtI[YIN fACTb * VV *"sX `. -- 4 -�� 4 �.+.'S,a�'k..w�'s�� 'Fs^� 'S'�4y.�+ti;.::� �z'S,�.,+z„z �� 4� •sem. .. "� �� -:�^ }a�.� =��'2 �i 4�`'. �4�5,� t` 4� =Au u_ ,n STATF. OFA CAY�1FOR�I ...9 . w'e�x r' 4r�"1' "'1,'; ,-a3.-a: 5 tr �,� ,-4 ".', �.'�, y fR.v i z z l n. 1 a� •y, •you .�>;` �' ;.yi b,�,{s"..,-s. Y .,''k �., t.. } __,"."'"r� _..,"�5:,"£s, �, t }�._�.�...�� t� +.��"' 3�z';�,2.5'". ...,,;.., y � "� 6.si.��$-�F �3y..,; � ._,.. -��.'+�°.•.xt^':. - ��' - �=.' -^'1,,•x �k -;.rrrs Z ":c.- .r r •;_ r.. t a»k,.""�� -3r°t�m*"��,<s.,JT`� 03� �5.'' �` (iotln .a�tIIt2n fl+'�eSSIf,E2$S2dllt�.t}I$2e2nd f'=C0 _ - r R:� ` � c ., } 1`" .� ,k;' c'.`3F}.• '°'pit�c` .Pt 3u"�" �+'�" t stoned and stirozn,;personallyappe lato�rn-to MOM the person whose`name, _S' WARe>.tcithIn-iastrnxnenrF�th_ attorney to fact of `FIREMAN'S Y FUND [NSURANCM-COMP, r and. ackno«ledgedf=to� nicthatl•es subscitoedthe.,7uimeof¢�) FRE,�i^�t'aaFGU `��"r'` �_�; -: = � `: IAISUIt.A�CE�GOIIP�li1'��thereto as prtncipal�'iiud IL. w,*�i�ni'��ta.,s'�attorne a".ti` °4 S.:est F 1 �x ..Lai r vT•?r, Z aa,t,� <r'`'� y 1\«IT NESS4At'HEP.EUF,I ha a hexe'unto setbmv l•.anit�Mattsi'affiredzn� o ct seal, :�arx t i '` � r� �,1. ,.. :• ,fi.�. �'2 fes.:V�" i.{.^u s 'S, asn��.�4`S'F.,��r+�•��.2 ^s��'r - at 3; t 'a; T=r ;` the 6, Ind z��r in this certificate first above tc rttten " •.y.i 1 t z._, f f" y M..4 :.,. r y . `e tyxn, wa:` {.� .. iH 7•,; '*� _ --non>' - sm . ,! m �`' '. rr t^•-.. i.. '•#r F��iI�2`�.f ,� � A xr„ .oI^L. F i , s. C � .. ry � < 3 stn'✓ '^ 'may ...;C` �si ,,+�,{{ �,L{ 3� � z s 41 •r- �, ':. r -n ,�i `k �� *rt -tt y "'�'�':.z+r.sY"��x��,{ tri .^. �`;� x y a r -c' t 4 .ar; U� � `^ �, j-�5�`� _''+� �fi iawt•�z p'��.?sy '�' T �� w� "' '� ti 4 , ��, � �• � .� �'otar�;'P,,ubltc,tn andfor tlter� .._. :....�"�:..` `Count}�oir_.�'��.� `� state-O Caldorn11 '' x -^^,' t.. "` ax �..#'." t ''�,". -+ .c+r• t. s` E Krt 3 t f SF i yk�3 � ( t -y .� Yx r{•ct 7 �,""r w a t : K"' j t., �, Z•.•• �:: �t .+.� ' � '.t a. s d r ,? r, t,._ �t,� f 1.: t"&�7,+,a'S~ 'S,,• fi.. �, i-•�-} 5.€J'W"=Yf c *a ro ti r " ,}a,i,F^.s�:� .�f"t--.`".�.'S r� •iYt'C�ek� `1fY'3^ K".c�+,� r� a ' �r�'a lrw".ti..k>,�s mw. �sa� •.'�dr.�.`^++��C.:,`�t, 4`3,.t,=x� `<'..�-�,+,� .t a_..�+ w.,t t't.,<.,..� �,r,x4..�..rt`�:*.�?+7a4re.�',.•au<�P?I.a �.t#�„te��.�.5^. t,. t k"... Sf�fwi.P b . P� ....... ... Bond No. _SC 627 59 43 e FIREMAN'S n"MAM•s rum IMSMR.N=coup"v WrIM TII<ANswIewll IM".mc co"'" MATIOMAL MMLTT C FUNDORPORATION r ARROCIATtO RRICMINTV CORPORATION •t' AMERICAN ANCRICAM AIITONRRuc INRYMAMM CaM►AMV •• 1 •. c INSURANCE C O M rA N 1 E S NO-9 0MC9 RAM MAMCIM0.GLI/ORMIA SUBDIVISION BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: ' That C. GENE CROWELL , as Principal and the undersigned surety, a corporation, licensed to transact a surety business in the State of California, as Surety, are hold and firmly bound unto the_COUMY OF COt+M COSTA State of California, in the penal sum of FORTY-THREE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NO/100 - - - - - - - - 43,900.00 ) DOLLARS, for the pay- ment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, succ- essors and assigns, jointly and severally by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THE ABOVE OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That whereas said Prinicpal, the owner of a tract of'land representing a subdivision entitled TRACT 4444 intends to file a map thereof with the County Recorder of the COUwy OF CONTRA COSTA and " WHEREAS, the said map of C. GENE CROWELL shows said property described as follows: TpACC 4444 on which said Principal desires to construct improvements acid petition the COUNIT OF CONTRA COSTA to accept the improvements and to approve said map of_ C. GENE CROWELL of said subdivision before said map may be accepted, and WHEREAS, it is required by the subdivision Map Act of the State of California, in effect August 27, 1937, that said C. GENE CROWELL require a bond conditioned for the improvements of' TRACT 4444 of said subdivision before said map may be accepted, and WHEREAS, said Principal proposes at its own cost and expense to improve mid TRACT 4444 _ within the limits of said subdivision before AUGUST 22, 19, 77 in accord- ance with the following: 360026-4-65 00076.V. J i j. .l. ` 1. 1. ,v L'� ryS. .- _ , ... - .. - _ .. _ .: _. - ,.. - - i. r..-,-_ :, .-... , - _, -. .'. • . - }t.rt� . _ _%.r.. .. . .. iA _. .':, - .. . -T ' - ,. - - { Y t NOW, THEREFORE, if the said G. -GENE:CR0',•lELL' . 3C: ownerof said TRArr " 444 ca Sit: ' - and: is Principal.named in .this bond, shall well and truly cause mrd; improvements within=the limits"of-said subdrviion tobe improved as hereinbefore'speci£ied, then <t this obligation shall.cease and be void, 'otherwise, it-sha_11 remain in:full force aril effect cud � ` ' t the Sure on s, and binds itself o said GOUNTY Or'"t;ONTRA COSTA ty fs to 11 Ithe.,cmount.of the hereinabove stated penal sum,'that sdld property'shall be improved in accord x ; ante with the hereinabove stated provisions ,�' Sr: r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Principal has hereunto set its hands and"seals,`:and said Surety has r f caused thes"presents to.be„executed:by its off iters thereunto authorized this 25TH M day-of <AIIGIIST , 19°7� :;; 1.4 1: Iy _ G•_ tEhE GROWE�I' a; r x ", �-.� f V L,. s� ( '_ Principal -_ { r ., ..:.: E[REMANtS .FUND tNSURANt;E, C!?H.�ANY } t Surety ' ` - I r B1, Iy i tiargaret J. Ouran Alto' -in F f :.:: : r I 11 . . -. t - .. . : .-`. - ' `. .. .._ -+ -. I 160026-4-65 `!, . ' . :. �: ': "j' . , . . , . , , } n NOTARIAL'ACKNO1.Wi,EDGMFNT—ATTORNEI/IN FACT , STATE •: f ' �1 Q OI'.1.C�LIFORN ' -; L4 On thea 22nd 'day of } u$4t�Ti Tv�`" ---= - County of S.a. me, 19 �S beforer _ t�.3.:1 _ 77; �. said " a Notary Public in and for r County,State aforesaid,residingaherem duI coned and sxorn,.personally appeared -- :Mar aret ycommu �y _ - �notdn to me to be the person Whosename.is �ubgribed to.'thewtan�n;_. ent.! the k. . :attorney in tact of i FIRE11 IMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY and acknowledged to me 'that he` subscribed the name of_FIRE1TAt*,S g INSURAI. . II O., . I thereto 1.as'principal, - drh*s ot��n as attorney-jn f. ,,. r •� Y1�1 ; I\TtiIT\ESS �i�FIEREOF, 11 : 11I have hereunto set my hand end at fixed �,i offeial seal a m ' IlSce n the said : the day and y Coun ear in this certificate firstabove��ritten.'.ty' " .•$ �, 'T'`ht ; of �. "1 y, " ./ - _ •fit ,„�. - L _ 1-•L� c L.��"..M"Gt�il'�'Ij ,..�tf . • State of C ifornialic in a nd for the Count3 of , - , �� } IIy commission exgires._.....-._ F k. . , "_ _«w. _... _. I��/ - 360042-51. ` . a j{{:. .:I- fA, t•y . ,i , •y,'�' h �(__ . . ;' � s� �S 64 j:, -, ., r .,+ -ri. _d h X'�` 7as` " _. a YT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Abandcnment of ) - a portion of Hawthorne Drive, ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/687 (Walnut Creek area). ) Date: Sentember 2.-.1975 Resolution&-Notice of Intention To Abandon County Road (S.& H. Code 6§956.8, 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Cowl' RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code it declares its intention to abandon the hereinafter described County Road. 10.30 It fixes Tuesday, October 21 1975 at 12 a.m. (or as continued) in its Chambers, Admln-istratlon BulldliFg, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for hearing evidence offered by any interested party as to whether this road is unnecessary for present or prospective public use. This matter is referred to the Planning Commission for report before the hearing. The County Clerk shall have notice of this matter (1) published in the Contra Csta Times , a newspaper of general circulation published lfn. this County which is designated as the newspaper most likely to give notice to' persons interested in the proposed abandonment, for at least two successive weeks beforethe hearing, and (2) posted conspicuously along the line of this road at least two weeks before the hearing. DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. VJW:bw (Res. & Not. Aband.) (CC-71:250:8/72) RESOLUTION NO. �Z5/697 00078 (CC-71:250:8/72) RESOLUTION N0. 75/697 00078 Hawthorne Drive EXHIBIT "A" Road No. 424S BA July 24, 1975 ,! - ROAD ABANDON. ENT Portion of Hawthorne Drive as said road is shown on the map entitled, "Idylwood Acres - Unit No. 1, Contra Costa County, California," filed ray. - 6, 1946, in Book 29 of Maps, at page 12, Records of Contra Costa County- California, described as follows: Beginning on the southwesterly line of said Hawthorne Drive at the southerly line of said Idylwood Acres - Unit No. 1 (29 MB 12) ; thence, from said point of beginning along said southwesterly line of Hawthorne Drive North 240 33' 20" West, 13.37 feet; thence, northwesterly along a'tangent curve to the left, having a radius of SO.00 feet,,through a. central angle 'of 790 461 40", an arc distance of 69.62 feet, thence,tangent to said curve South 7S° 40' 00" West, 26.73 feet; thence, North 370 04' 40" West,-S4.22 'feet to the northeasterly line of said Hawthorne Drive; thence, along said: northeasterly line North 750 40' 00" East, 47.70 'feet; thence,,,southeasterly along a tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 100.00 feet, through a central angle of 79046' 40"a an arc distance-of 139.24 feet; thence, tangent to said curve South 24 33' 20" East, 13.37 feet to, said southerly line. . of Idylwood Acres - Unit No. l (29 MB 12); thence,, along said. southerly, line South 650 26' 40" West, 50.00 feet to the point of beginning. i V V 079 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: Proposed Abandonment of ) portions of Warner and ) RESOLUTION NO. -75/61$ Del Porto Roads ) (Oakley area). ) Date: Se tember 2 1 75 Resolution & Notice of Intention To Abandon County Road (S.& H. Code §§956.8, 958) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa Cour+y RESOLVES THAT: Pursuant to the Streets and Highways Code it declares its intention to abandon the hereinafter described County Road. October 21 1975, at a.m. It fixes Tuesday, (or as continued) in its Chambers, Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the time and place for. hearing evidence offered by any interested party as to whether this road is unnecessary for present or prospective public use. This matter is referred to the Planning Commission for report before the hearing. The County Clerk shall have notice of this matter (1) published in the Brentwood News , a newspaper of general circulation published in this County which is designated as the newspaper most likely to give notice to persons interested in the proposed abandonment, for at least two successive weeks before the hearing, and (2) posted conspicuously along the line of this road at least two weeks before the hearing. DES C_RIPTION: See Exhibits "A"s attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED unanimously by Supervisors present. VJW:bw (Res. & Not. Aband.) (CC-71:250:8/72) RESOLUTION N0. 75/698 00080 Road Abanlonment Warner Road, (No- County',': -Road Number) EXHIBIT A Portion of the road known as Warner Road as; sai.d road is described in the easement to Contra Costa County recorded September 23, 1919 in Book 347 of Deeds at page 146, 'Records of Contra Costa County, California lying in the NE ; of Section 14 and the SE 4 of Section 11, Township 1 North, Range 3' Easty Mount Diablo Base and Meridian described as follows: `' A strip of land 50 feet in width the centerline being- described as follows: Commencing on the centerline of said Warner Road-at the westerly line of said NE 4 of Section 14; thence from said point of commencement along said centerline easterly 800 feet and northeasterly 60 feet, more or less, to the southerly " right of way line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa. 'Fe Railroad and the true point of beginning of the said 50 'feet in width strip of land; thence from said true point of beginning, continuing along said centerline of Warner Road, northeasterly` 240 feet, more or less, and northerly 300 feet, moreorless, to the northerly right of way line of said railroad `being the northerly terminus of said 50 feet in width strip of land. 00001 Del, Porto, Road (N8030) (No County Road Number) Road Abandonment EXHIBIT A A portion of the road known as Del Porto Road described in Road Book No. 1, at page 189 in the Office of the Clerk of The Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, California, dated March 1, 1897, lying in the southwest hof section 24 and the northwest ; of section 25, Township 2 North, Range 2 East, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, described as follows: Beginning on the northerly line of said section 25 at the southwesterly line of the 100-foot wide Atchison,. Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Right of Way from which the north- west corner of said section 25 bears North 89047' West (the bearing North 89047' West being taken for the purpo-se of this description) 500.53 feet; thence, from said 80int of beginning along said southwesterly line, North 67 04' West, 58.26 feet to the north line of said Del Porto .Road;thence, along said north line, South 89047' East, 258.95 feet to the northeasterly line of said Atchison, Topeka and- Santa Fe Railway Company Right of Way; thence, along said northeasterly line and its southeasterly extension, South 67°04' East, 116.53 , feet to the south line of said Del Porto Road; thence, along . " _ said -south line, North 89047' West, 388.43• feet to the northeasterly line of the strip of land described -in the Deed to Contra Costa County, recorded May 14, 1902, in Book 93 of Deeds at page 493, Records of Contra Costa County, California; thence, along said northeasterly line, North 67° 04' West, 58.26 feet to said northerly line of section 25; thence, along said northerly line, South 89°47' East, 129.48 feet to the point of beginning. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Completion ) RESOLUTION NO. 75/699 of improvements and declaring ) certain roads as County ) .roads, Subdivision 4295, ) Danville Area. ) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having notified this Board that the construction of improvements has been completed in Subdivision 4295, Danville area, as provided in the agreement heretofore executed by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the subdivision map; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements in the following subdivision have been completed for the purpose of establishing a terminal period for filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: Subdivision Date of Agreement 4295, Danville area June 5, 1973 (United Pacific Insurance Company - Bond No. U 75 59 36) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $500 cash deposit as surety (Auditor's receipt No. 108412 dated MaX 30, 1973 ) be RETAINED for one year pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code as amended. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hereinafter described road having been heretofore dedicated to public use by the filing of map in the office of the County Recorder, be and the same are accepted and declared to be County road sof Contra Costa County: DIABLO ROAD WIDENING RICHARD LANE (36/56/0.31) SCOTCH COURT (32/52/0.03) SODA PLACE (32/52/0.04) as shown and dedicated for public use on the map of Subdivision 4295 filed June 6, 1973 in Book 157 of Maps at page 42, Official Records of Contra Costa County, 'State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board on September 2, 1975 cc: Recorder Public Works Director Garden Creek Development Co., Inc. 804 Richard Lane Danville, California 94526 • RESOLUTION N0. 75/694 V`0083 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERV3:SOR5 OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Amending Itemized Fees for Documents and Photographic RESOLUTION NUMBER 75/ 7pC Services Effective September 1, 1975 WHEREAS the Sheriff-Coroner has submitted a schedule of itemized fees for documents and photographic services to amend the schedule of itemized rates adopted by Board Resolution on May 31, 1961: and WHEREAS the County Administrator recommends that the amended schedule of itemized rates become effective September 1, 1975: and WHEREAS the Board has carefully considered the recommendation of the Sheriff-Coroner: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that the following itemized fees, recommended by the Sheriff-Coroner, are APPROVED effective September 1, 1975: I. Photographic Print Processing (F.O.B. Martinez office only) Print Size Fee Each Process Up to 33/2" x 5" $ 3.00 Black/White and all contact sheets 5.00 Color^ up to 8" x 10" 7.00 Black/White 10.00 Color 11" x 14" 10.00 Black/White 15.00 Color 16" x 20" 25.00 Black/White 25.00 Color - II. Photo Services (Prints extra at above rates) Photo Copy Work $14.00 each hour or fraction Outside Camera Work $14.00 each hour or fraction Special processing/handling $14.00 each hour or fraction Off-hours Work $25.00 each hour or fraction III. Documents Copies per single page $ 1.00 Each additional page $ .50 Method of reproduction shall be at the direction of the Sheriff-Coroner Adopted by the Board on...SEp 2 1975 RESOLUTION NUMBER 75/ 7nr) cc: County Sheriff-Coroner County Auditor-Controller County Administrator (P) 0008 r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Urging Allocation of Grant Funds to the Central Contra Costa } Sanitary District for its Solid Waste } RESOLUTION NO. 75/701 Energy Demonstration Project. } } WHEREAS Supervisor A. M. Dias reported, in his capacity as Chairman of the Contra Costa County Solid Waste Management Policy Committee, that the county comprehensive solid waste man- agement plan is nearing completion; and WHEREAS the recovery of materials and energy from solid waste is a key element of the plan under preparation; and k'HEREAS the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District has allocated funds to conduct a full scale demonstration project to ascertain the engineering and economic feasibility of producing electricity for the operation of the District's wastewater treat- ment facility by the incineration of solid wastes; and WHEREAS the utilization of solid wastes for the pro- duction of energy would have a significant impact upon wastewater and solid waste management within this county; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Super- visors of Contra Costa County, that the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the State Water Resources Control Board are urged to give immediate favorable consideration to the allocation of Grant Funds to the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District for the express purpose of expediting and conducting its Solid Waste Energy Demonstration Project. PASSED and ADOPTED by the Board on September 2, 1975• cc: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency State Water Resources Control Board Congressman George Miller Senator John Nejedly Assemblyman John Knox Assemblyman Daniel Boatwright Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Solid Waste Management Policy Committee Supv. E. A. Linscheid Acting County Health Officer Public Works Director Director of Planning County Administrator County Counsel RESOLUTION NO. 75/701 0��85 A- ,J t { IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Approving ) the Revaluation of Ground ) .Rental for Airport Lease ) RESOLUTION NO.- 75/702 (George Valente, originally ) Brabant & Sullivan) ) (Buchanan Field Airport) . ) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT: Under Section 5 (Rental) of the Lease between the County of Contra Costa, as Lessors, and Arthur J. Brabant, et �al, dated March 16, 1965 and as amended in the First Addendum to Lease ap- proved by the Board of Supervisors on April 11, 1967 and assigned to George Valente, et ux by Assignment of Lease approved in Board Resolution No. 72/231 dated April 11, 1972, the lease provides for revaluation of the ground rental at the end of ten-year periods of the original lease terms. NOW, THEREFORE, this Board hereby approves the Public - Works Director's recommendation that the ground rental of said lease and amendment be increased from $2,000 per year to $2,496 per year,; payable $208 per month,- effective March 16, 1975 pursuant to the rights of the Lessee to appeal the rental increase by arbitration of appraisers as provided in said Section 5. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975- cc : Lessee (c/o R/W) Airport Manager Public Works (2) Auditor Assessor Administrator RESOLUTION NO. 75/702 0008f)" r i BOARD OF SUPEF.VISORS OF COU:•STY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA Re: Compensation Adjustment for 1975-76 for Certain } RESOLUTION 90'.' 75/703 Iianagement Classes. ) 1. This Board, on July 31,. 1975, adopted Resolution Not. 75/592 providing for the compensation for certain County officers and employees for the 1975-76 fiscal year. 2. In a memorandum to this Board dated August 29, 1975, sub— mitted by the County Administrator, it is recommended that additional; adjustments be made with respect to the compensation of certain county officers and employees. 3. The Board having thoroughly considered said memorandum, approves it. 4 . It being necessary to adopt a Resolution to implement certain of the provisions of the memorandum, this Board adopts said Resolution as follows: (a) Effective September 1, 1975, the salaries of the officers and employees specified in Schedule A of Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein, are as specified, provided however, that those salaries followed by the notation "Eff. l/l/76" shall not become effective until January 1, 1976. (b) Effective July 1, 1975,Exhibits A and B of Resolution Uo. 75/592 are amended and corrected as set forth in .Schedule B of Attachment A attached hereto and incorporated herein. (c) The current incumbent of the District Attorney Chief Investi- gator position shall be paid a sum of One. Hundred Dollars ($100.00) as full and final settlement for all required safety equipment here- tofore purchased at the Inspector's own expense. PASSED September 2j 1975, unanimously by the Supervisors present. cc: Employee Relations Officer County Counsel Director of Personnel County Administrator Auditor-Controller EVL:sp RESOLUTIONS NO. 75/703 m087 M �..La."iJ 0008 I SCHEDULE A Title Salary: Level Range Appeals and Complaints Specialist 331 1011-1229 344 1020-1240 EFF. 1/1/76 Assas=aftt Proce3u:ea Analyst 442 1418-1724 A sa;.;taat Caua:y Cou=al 606 2333-2542 _x..:3.4 a at 'OuUic Daiia;lder 606 2338-2342 Building Inspection Engineer 482 1602-1947 Chief Deputy Agricultural Commissioner 456 1480-1799 Deputy Agricultural ComdIssioner 408 1279-1554 Eligibility Work Supervisor I 299 917-1115 Eligibility Word: Supervisor II 356 1091-1326 Equipment Mechanic Foreman 412t 1427-1573 Fire Apparatus Foreman 408t,� -- 2410-1554 ' Housing Improvement Coordinator 450 1451-1166 Medical Social Services Supervisor 403 416 1310-1592. Eff. 1/1/76 . Principal Electrical Inspector 458 1489-1810 Principal Mechanical Inspector 458 1489-1810 '. . Probation Outreach Activity Center Supervisor 451 1458-1772 Probation Supervisor I 451 1458-1772 Probation Supervisor 11 483 - • . 1607-1953 � • . •L Social Services Clerical Specialist 346 1058-1286 - • Social Work Supervisor I 371 ' 1142-1388 384 2lm-1444 ' .uf. 1/1/76• Social. v= Suplmism 11' 403 1259-1531 416 - 1310-1592 ' Eff. 111/76. .Staff Developmant Specialist '424 1342-1632' Bff. 1/1/76 Supervising Appraiser I 441 1414-1719 Supervising Appraiser II 441 . • 1414-1719 Supervising Building Inspector 450 1453-1766 • ' ' Su Co®maieations Tec 432t 1517 1672 ' Petvisittg �..�.••t'.. Supervising Storekeeper 337 1030-1252 Supervising Z-RayT� +c+sem 339 . 1036-17.59 Yj. Vocational Services Supervisor I ' 371 3142-1388 . .. 384 3188-1444 Bff.• 1/1176 ' Assistant Secretary to the Superior Coact Judges ' 247 .783-951 Probation Supervisor I-Project 451 1458-1772 Social Program-Planner I-Project 384 ]188-].444 Sff. 111176 . •social Program Planner ]T�roject 448 .1444-1756 'Bff. 1/1/76 Title Si3azyiNo"ficarlons to. T.evRl • ••,•y:.'.v Y�••.y'•. AL2 r ALm '..Assistant Social-Smvfae 63axical Speda33st 296 • • - .909--3104-'. r s::*_:��''-_ Chief Program Evaluator . 487 • - 1627-1977: • County Welfare Diseet= " 667 2817-3424: ' - Field Rquipment Supervisor 393t. 3347-1485 Graphics Techalci,an II - Project 297 911-2108 • '-. Grounds Ptainteaaace Super-intendant 437 1397-1698 • ' Planaiag Grapb3as Supervisor '415. . 1306-1588' - Student Vocational Nursa - 30g; hcnw . Additions to Ezhibit B, Resolution 75/592 Executive Assistant to the Mental. Health Advisory Board Planning Technician III 00000. In the Board of Supervisors -.of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 1975 In the Maths of Dissolving Inactive Committees. The Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) having this day advised that it has com- pleted its review of committees, advisory boards, and commissions., which are appointed by the Board, established by County Ordinance, or mandated by state or federal regulations; and . The Committee having recommended dissolution of those shown on the attached Exhibit "All '(incorporated herein by reference) inasmuch as the functions for. which they were established have been completed; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Government Operations Committee is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and coned copy of an order md" on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid. cc: County Administrator W*, my hand and the Sed of the Board of Public Works Director SupenesaR Director of Planning Human Resources Agency affixed this 2nd day ofAtRtember . 19 75 County Sheriff-Coroner J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel Director of Personnel By `- Deputy C.6fk Bonnie Boaz 00089 H 24 WS 20" 00089 H 24 WS aOMI = CO�iITT:ES, CMMSSI01*S VIT ADVISORY BOARDS (To Be Dissolved) " •Date - - - Established COUNTY STUDENT PROTECTION COMMITTEE 10-31-61 COI ILTIEE TO STUDY VATERFRONT DEVELOPPEETIT 321D , 21AVIGATIONAL NEWS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY � " 9--11-62 ARTHUR ROAD COMITTEE: (Reactivated 2-6-68) A-26-63 STATE .COLLEGE SITE SELECTION COlh'IUTTEE 8-26-65 COMMJ TEE TO CONSIDER SALARY AND FRINGE fi ?T,9.TTE_RS FOR FIRE SERVICE PERSONNEL 4-19-66 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HISTORICAL ADVISORY- COMITTEE 7- 5-66 COUNTY LACI ENFORCE-MIT AND CRIMINAL JUSTIC3 STUDY CCWTTEE 5- 2-67 CO's UTTEE TO STUDY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL-1 EggUESTS TO EIR?eT OFFI-CE-l3 C0 OMIC OPPORTUNITY POSITIONS FROM CIVIL SERVICE 7- 5-67 COC{ITS TO CONSULT WITH DEPARMENT READS ON STAFFIb°G, 2�AIlAGEMEyT FUNCTIONS AND RELATED MT^lEc2S (See Administrative) (Reactivated 1-23-68) 7_31-6T COUNTY I•L� MEVELOPtMEKT COMISSION 8-29-67 LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION STUDY COMIT TEES SC_R=1%11G COMITTEE 9- 6-66 p_T Ah.TING -41%rD T'R.ANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMITTEE 3-14-67 POLT.CY COL ITT .Sr, 2 3.6_6a TE'CIMICAL COMMITTEE I-23-6$ %"ES• SFJT DELTA STEERING COMA- TTEE (Reactivated) 2 I3-.6$ C:,I-L it i iEE API'�3IN , 10 C�-3121 , R DvTH. SHOR=' LO=:G-- RA GE SOLUTIONS TO LAN EhrqORCE4Fi T AND OME PROBL O..S OF EL PUEBLO HOUSING DEVELOP:IM1T.3, PITTSBURG ARE 4_ 9-68 00090 -goad wi!er �Co=ittees to be Dissolved 'tAk; a Two COM;iI'TTEE TO STUDY ?•',EMITS OF OBTAINING ADDITIONAL LEGAL 4-16-68 Cv^vYSEL AND REME4RCH RE PROTECTION OF OFFSHORE :FAtr R SUPPLY OF ::EST£R'Y DF.TTA CO!• :I T TEE TO STUDY BOARD CALENDAR 6-18-68 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMOTITTME TO STUDY PROBLEMIS OF DEVEL•OPi ENT OF BRADFORD ISLAND AND WEBB TRACT IN CO.2%:I'IECTION "WITH TIM PROPOSED 01ENI)MME IT TO THE 0?31 I14ANCE CODE PROVIDING FOR AN AGRICULTURAL-DISTRICT HAVING A MINIM"; OF 25 ACRES 6-18-68 CITIMS JAIL BOND COMMITTEE 8-13-68 . SPECIAL C0LNU'ITTEE TO STUDY THE FINANCING PROPOSALS RE ADDITIONS TO TFC JUVETILE HALL 8-13;68 MiPLOYEE-EITIPTsOYER COMMITTEE TC REVIEW CERTAIN CLASSIFI- CATION AND COMPENSA^1ION MATTERS 8-30-68 COMMITTEE ON COUNTY PRISONER ENPLOMENT (reactivated) 11-19-68 COLMEXITTEE TO STUDY COUNTY SUPERVISORIAL REDISTRICTI'N'G 1-14-69 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMMIITY SAE;TER PLAN ADVISORY CTE. . 1-2E-69 COM1ITTEE TO MEET WITH PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW POLICIES RE DEVELDPIPPENT OF BET.REL ISL0D 2-11-69 - CO?1131T^lEE TO iMSTIGATE AND REPORT ON PROPERTY DISASTER CWIDT_TIO11S I\ Tom' C0U11TY 3_ 4-59 - ST E3ING COMITTEE ON FLOOD PROTECTION FROM MT. DIABLO CF= .11-25-69 DA`: IMM ADVISORY COMIITTEE TO SOCIAL SER",'ICE DEPART m-nT 12--26-69 STATE ROUTE 93 STUDY COti&1ITTEE (formerly Route 254 Study Committee) CE_:--'-UL C0UYTY STUDY CO,7LITTEE TO REtr 17;! T10: BAY AREA IUALPID TR_�ISIT STATION F.NVIROPiS PLAN FOR THE PLEASA TT HILL STATION (A►:D ALSO TO DE-TEIMINE ROUTE FOR STATE NIGH-WAY 24T - 77) 6-23-70 CO:.:;:IT^E3 TO STUDY POLICY 1RA-TTE?S RE LFG_4, ITOTICLS MM 11� T�11.� /� OT N�� ^►�y r L..S Ps,:L•:.1 iitr AND C�MR DEP AR!.,•._.I:TS) oeogi Co=_ttees to be Dissolved Page Three HOSPi TAIL .County Management Team (referred to as "Hospital 5-11-7Z Systems Committee") - Hospital-Systems _Team (referred to as ahe< "AID-Team!!), IXT1L4—COUNTLY COORDINATION COM4ITTEE. — to aid State 2=15-72 Intergovernmental Board on Electronic Data - Processing in developing statewide welfare management information system AIRPORT CONSULTANT EVALUATION BOARD 5-16-72 ' CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ENERGY CONSERVATION COiBlITTEE 4 32-13m-73=, CONVIIIE'TEE TO CONSIDER REHABILI^1ATION PROGRAMS FOR = 12 4-73 INCARCERATED PERSONS (Cte. reported on 12-17-74. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Ssvtember 2 , 19 In the Matter of 1976 CAP Multi—Year Plan. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute the 1976 CAP Multi-Year Plan for the County Office of Economic Opportunity, which plan describes the needs, priorities, programs, goals and objectives in the areas of manpower, education, Aransportation and direct services for the years 1976, 1977 and 1978. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Economic Opportunity (2) Supervisors Administrator affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 75 Auditor J. R. OISSON, Clerk By__O . Gtcc�--� . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M L. Kincaid 0��9� OFFICE OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MEMORANDUM To EOC Members DATE: August 26, 1975 FROM : George W. Johnson r' t ,+ � o SUBJECT: Multi-Year Plan (MYP) As part of the planning process for the 1976 CAP grant, it is necessary for the Community Action Agency (CAA) to develope a Multi Year Plan Q1ftP) This document shows the areas of needs, priorities, programs, goals and objectives, and major allocation of funds that the CAA has identified through the Area Councils with help of staff, consultants, and co=unity people. These recommendations have been submitted to the Program Development Committee (PDC). This committee plus staff assistance developed this single document from the information from the A/Cs. Two joint meetings, in Pittsburg and San Pablo, were held on August 21 and 22 to give the four area councils- in each area an opportunity for a final review of the document in order to be assured that the recommendations from their council were included. Minor modification was recommended and accepted by the PDC. The attached MYP is then the final result of Area Council and PDC actions and cooperation. The EOC will be asked by the PDC to review and take action in the Hyp at the August 28 meeting. , Upon approval it will then be forwarded to the County Board of Supervisors and Regional CSA. The PDC has requested that each EOL' member receive a copy of the HYP prior'.to the EOC meeting of August 28 so as to have adequate time to review the document. enc. GWJ aeh 0009 nucrommed'with. board;order OEO 37 (rev.2169) OEO 37 (rev.WIGS) MULTI YEAR PLAY OBJECTIVES - 1976-78 1i.VIPOWER 1. Job Placement To directly place low income persons in full time, permanent, unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sectors for a period of three months or until the probationary period is completed. (Specific client groups identified in the individual area council objectives.) Underemployed Third Year Goal 865-885 Third Year Goal 30-45 Second Year Milestone 654-664 Second Year Milestone 20-30 First Year Milestone 337-342 lst Year Milestone 10-15 A. Southside Area Council : To directly place low income persons inclusive of youth, women, minorities, the elderly, and physically handicapped, 10% of whom are individuals with special or potential problems such as drug abuse, alcoholism, and ex-offenders, in full-time unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sectors for a period of three months or until probation is completed whichever is longer. Third Year Goal : 300 2nd Year Mile-tone: 200 lst Ya:-!,r Milestone: 100 B. north Richmond/Iron Triangle Area Council : To directly place low income nersons inclusive of youth, women, minorities, the elderly, and the physically handicapped with special emphasis on 101; of those individuals with special or potential such as drug abuse, alcoholism and criminal records, in full time unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sector for a perict of at least three months or until probation period is completed whichever is longer. Third Year Goal : 125 2nd Year Milestone: 82 i st Year Mi 1 estene: 41 C. San Pablo/Parchester Area Council : To directly place low income persons, inclusive of youth, women, minorities, the elderly, and handicapped, 10% of whom will be individuals with special or potential problems such as drug abuse, alcoholism, and criminal records in full-time, unsubsidized positions in the public or private sectors for a period of three months or until job probation is completed. Third Year Go 1 : 200 2nd Year 7'i 1 es tone: 132 l st Year Milestone: 66 00095 Page 2 Page 2 of Manpower D. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council : To place low income persons, including youth, women, minorities, the elderly, and people with special problems such as drug addiction or prison records, in full-time, unsubsidized jobs for at least three months or until completinn of probation whichever is longer, with follow-up counseling. Third Year mal : 60 2nd Year Milestone: 50 1st Year Milestone: 35 E. Martinez Area Council: To place single heads of households in full time unsubsidized emnioyment; at least 501 of those placed would complete their probationary period each year. Third Year Goal : 60-80 2nd Year Milestone: 30-40 lst Year Milestone: 15-20 E. Central Area Council : To place Central count target area persons with an emphasis on young adults (18-25) and minorities in full time unsubsidized positions; at least 50% will have completed their probationary period. Third Year Goal: 120 2nd Year Milestone: RO 1st Year Milestone: 40 G. Pittsburg Area Council: 1. To place Pittsburg target area persons in full time, permanent, unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sectors with job information and job referral services given to those seeking job placement; those place*' will complete their probationary period. Third Year Goal : 120 2nd Year Milestone: 80 1st Year Milestone: 40 2. To place underemployed persons into positions which match their education and skills/ability; those ;persons placed will have completed their probation period. Third Year Goal: 30-45 2nd Year 11ilestone: 20-30 ist Year "tiiestone: 13-15 90096 MEMO T,, } Page 3 Page 3 of Manpower 2. Job Counseling To provide job/vocational counseling to low income persons. (Specific client groups and content areas of the counseling are identified in the individual area council objectives) Third Year Goal : 320 2nd Year Goal : 200 1st Year Milestone: 100 A. Martinez Area Council : To provide job counseling to low income persons of which at least 50% must be youth and young adults (16-25 years) and 10% must ba persons with special problems (i.e. ,ex-offenders, alcoholics, drug-users etc.) Third Year Goal : 60-30 2nd Year Milestone: 30-40 lst Year Milestone: 15-20 B. Central Area Council : To counsel Central County target area persons with emphasis on those with special problems (drugs, alcoholism, ex-offenders,etc.) including, but not limited to the areas of supportive services and job preparation. Third Year Goal : 120; 20 with special problems 2nd Year Milestone: 80; 10 with special problems 1st Year Milestone: 40; 5 with special problems C. Pittsburg Area Council : To provide job counseling to law income persons with an emphasis on minorities and those witti special problems (i.e. drug abuse, alcoholism, criminal records, etc.) Third Year Goal : 120; 20 with special problems 2n' Year Milestone: 80; 10 with special problems 1st Year Milestone: 40; 5 with special problems 3. Jnb Develon.ment To develop full time unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sectors for low income persons. Third Year G<-)al : 341-3513 2nd Year Milestone: 224-236 1st Year Milestone: 112-124 00097 y 4 Page 4 Page 4 of Manpower A. San Pablo/Parchester Area Council : To develon full time unsubsidized jobs in thepublic and private sectors. Third Year Goal : 200 2nd Year Milestone: 132 1st Year Milestone: 66 B. Martinez Area Council : To develop full time unsu5sidized jobs. Third Year Goal : 24-48 2nd Year Milestone: 12-24 1st Year Milestone: 6-12 C. Central Area Council : To. develop full time unsubsidized jobs with an ew.hasis on young adult (18-25) and minority ;placements in the newly developed jobs of which at least 50% of the jobs developed will he assured for Martinez target area residents; the jobs developed will meet the Federal minimum wage. Third Year Gaal : 120 2nd Year Milestone:80 1st Year Milestone: 40 4. On-The-Job Training (OJT) To develop OJT slots in the private sector (directly or through coordination with other existing manpower resources) Third Year Goal : 21 slots 2nd Year Milestone: 14 slots lst Year Milestone: 6 slots A. North Richmond/Iron Triangle Area Council : To develop OJT slots in the private sector with emphasis riven to youth and minorities for placement. Each OJT slot will be subsidized in the amount of $2,000 per slot for a period not to exceed six months in duration per slot. Third Year Goal : 6 2nd Year Milestone: 4 ist Year Milestone: 2 t. Page 5 of manpower Page 5 s page 5 Page 5 of manpower B. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council: To develop OJT slots by coordinating other manpower resources such as EDD and C.E.T.A. Third Year Goal : 15 2nd Year Milestone: 10 1st Year Milestone: 5 5. Skills Training To establish (or refer) low income persons to skills training programs which will train persons for full time unsubsidized jobs in the public and private sectors with emphasis on resource mobilization. Third Year Goal: 390-435 2nd Year Milestone: 260-290 lst Year Milestone: 130-145 A. Southside Area Council : To establish at least two skills training programs which will train low income persons for full time permanent positions in the public and private sectors; areas of skills training include; medical terminology and medical transcription. Third Year Goal: 120 2nd Year Milestone: 80 1st Year Milestone: 40 iWical Terminology: 3rd Year Goal : 90 2nd Year Milestone: 60 1st Year Milestone: 30 Medical Transcription: 3rd Year Goal : 30 2nd Year Milestone: 20 1st Year Milestone: 10 B. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council: To refer low income persons to appropriate skills training classes with an emphasi.; on unskilled persons by coordinating with such agencies as C.E.T.A. and C.C.JC. Third Year Goal : 75 2nd Year Milestone: 50 1st Year Milestone: 25 VRA page 6 Page 6 of Manpower y C. Martinez Area Council : To assist low income persons including at least 12% minorities to enroll in skills training each year. Each trainee will enter a field with a 5-10 year work span. Third Year Goal: 120-150 with a 55% success rate 2nd Year Milestone: 80-100 with a 45% success rate 1st Year Milestone: 40-50 with a 35% success rate D. Pittsburg Area Council : To establish at least 1-2 skills training program(s) through the mobilization of existing manpower, colleges, C.E.T.A. and other resources by means of research and development. Third Year Goal : 75-90 2nd Year Milestone: 50-60 1st Year Miles tone: 25-30 6. Job Preparation To provide job preparation to Inw income persons. A. Pittsburg Area Council : Third Year Goal : 200-2110 2nd Year Milestone: 100-120 ist Year Milestone: 50-60 7. Pre-Vocational Training Wnrkshaas To develop and implement pre-vocational training workshops for youth and adults, consisting of: identification of vocational interests and training needs, esta5lishment of career goals, preparation of job applications, and interview techniques, developing job finding skills and related interpersonal skills. Third Year Goal : 60 narticipants 2nd Year Milestone: 40 1st Year Milestone: 20- A. north Richmond Iron Triangle Area Council : To develon and imlement six pre-vocational training workshops for youth and adults, ranging from 19-35 years, for at least 60 hours. The pre-vocational program will include identification of vocational interests and training needs, establishment of career goals, preparation of joh applications and interview techniques developing job finding skills and developing interpersonal relations skills. Workshop nartici:)ants will be provided with supportive services consisting of: transportation, lunches, and child care. n 00 I MLTI YEAR PLA4 OBJECTIVES - 1976-78 page 7 EDUCATION 1. Tutoring Underachievers To provide tutoring to elementary and secondary level underachievers in specific academic subjects. (Specific client groups and levels of achievement are included In the individual area council objectives) Third Year Goal: 965-985 2nd Year Milestone: 650-665 1st Year Milestone: 335-345 A. Southside Area Council I . To provide tutoring services to underachievers in ,junior and senior high school in the basic education skills of reading and mathematics, resulting in an increase of 1/2 to I grade level in the California State Testing Scores by those students tutored. • 'ThtrO Year G161: 210 2nd Year Milestone: 140 .1st Year Milestone: 70 2. To provide tutoring services to elementary aged youth in attitudinal and socialization aspects, decreasing the number of principal/counselor referrals and improving attendance records, and in the basic educational skill of reading, rosuitfng in an Increase of 1/2 to I grade level in the California State Testing scores by those tutored. Third Year Goal: 210 2nd Year Milestone:140 ist Year Milestone B. North Richmond Iron Triangle Area Councii : To Tutor underachieving children in reading and math in the elementary and secondary schools, through one-to-one tutoring, twice weekly and through complementary activities, resulting In an achievement increase of at least one grade level in academic subjects tutored. Third Year Goal : 225 2nd Year Milestone: 150 ist Year Milestone: 75 001V1 page 8 Page 2 of Education C. San Pablo/Parchester Area Council : To tutor underachieving children from the elementary and secondary schools in reading and math and provide them with complementary. activities, resulting in an achievement increase of at least one grade level In the California State Testing scores .of those tutored. Third Year Goal : 105 2nd Year Milestone: 70 Ist Year Milestone: 35 D. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council : To provide tutr:ring to students in grades I through 6 in language arts and mathematics; at least 30% of those tutored will exhibit a one-year gain in language arts and mathematics as measured by standardized tests. Third Year Goal: 75 achievement gain 30 2nd Year Milestone: 50 achievement gain 15 Ist Year Milestone: 25 achievement ga n 5 E. Martinez Area Council To provide tutoring for the non-English speaking and other underachievers in grades K-12 in the following ways: 1. Tutoring on a one-to-one basis in academic skiils (reading,:, language,math,spajiing), resulting in an achievement gain of i year and three months growth in one year's time span, to be measured by pre and post testing of the tutored students.. Third Year Goa 1 : 40 2nd Year Mllestone: 30 Ist Year Milestone: 20 2. To provide an ESL program with bilingual instructions, resulting In an increase of one grade levet, averaging all grades and an I m- i-ovement of attendance: 3rd Year Goal : 30% 2nd Year Milestone: 20% Ist Year Milestone: 10 Third Year Goal : 25-30 2nd Year Milestone: 20-25 Ist Year Milestone:—T5-20 AL IL . y Page 3 of Education page 9 F. Pittsburg Area CounclI : To tutor youth, grades 8-12 in the areas of cultural development and reading, math; composition and the sciences, resulting In at least aone-grade increase In the academic subjects of those tutored. Third Year Goal : 75-90 2nd Year Milestone: 50-60 Ist Year Milestone: 25-30 2. Counseling To provide counseling in educational and other specified areas (i.e., vocational, family, inter-personal, minority, careery development, etc.). Specific client groups, techniques, and effectiveness measures are included in the individual area council objectives. Third Year Goal : 1170-1430 2nd Year Milestone: 750-920 Ist Year Milestone: 375460 A. Southside Area Council : To provide educational counseling to low income Junior and senior high school underachievers with special emphasis on 25% of the Individuals with special problems or potential problems such as drugs, negative classroom behavior, absenteeism, and poor student-teacher realtion ship. Educational counseling will Include the assessment of educational needs, skills development, improving academic skills; and educational motivation and family communications. The effectiveness of the counseling is to be measured by a 5% decrease in the number of principal/counselor referrals, and a decrease by 1% of the Richmond Unified School District drop-out rate for those counseled. Third Year Go-31: 210 2nd Year Milestone: 140 Ist Year Milestone: TO— B. North Richmond/iron Triangle Area Council : To provide personal, family and educational counseling and complerk:ntary activities (recreational, cultural, social) to target area youth, especially low income and minority youth (ages 15-18) to assist at least 35% of the youth will remain in school or continue their education for at least one year as a result of the counseling. Third Year Gaal : 300 2nd Year Milestone: 200 Ist Year Milestone: 100 001V3 page 10 Page 4 of Education D. Martinez Area Council : To provide counseling to minorities and/or underachievers in grades 7-12 of an educational and vocational nature, resulting in a reduction of the drop-out rate among those counseled by 50-60% and of the 20 seniors counseled a designated percentage will enter some form of post secondary education: 3rd Year Goal 50% 2nd Year Milestone: 25--35% 1st Year Milestone: 15-25 3rd Year Goal : 10 students 2nd Year GW-c-'- 7-8 students 1st Year Goal : 3-4 students 3rd Year Goal : 60-80 per month: caseload 2nd Year Milestone: 30-40 per month: caseload 1st Year Milestone: I5-20 per month; caseload E. Central Area Council : To establish a career development counseling center for youth aged 14-18 years of age to assist them in developing career choices. Counseling would include: identifying vocational needs and interests, and career goals; Inviting representatives from various employers with existing ,job markets to discuss current openings for part-time and summer ,jobs and past-education careers; assisting youth on skills and education requirements for a career. Third Year Goal 100 2nd Year Mi lestr rse: 80 i st Year Milestone: 40 F. Pittsburg Area Council : To provide counseling to minorities and other low income people In the target area in: a.education and career development b.ciass and course selection c.apnlication of educational learning d.referral to other services(i.e.,financial) a.confidential personal counseling Counseling will be provided by one-to-one and group methods and Include an out-reach service. Counselinn effectNoness` to be measured by a one grade (total subjects averaged) increase of 25% of those counseled each year. Third Year Goal : 200-240 2nd Year Miles 100-120 Ist Year Milestone: 50-60 page Page.5 of Education G. San Pablo/Parchester Village: To provide educational information about community`services,and survival skills for 200 San Pabio/Parchester Viilage residents, especially low-income and minority residents who are welfare recipients, especially-low-income and minority residents who are ` welfare reci6lents, senior citizens and/or handicapped,. thr ugh referrals, classes workshops and appearances before other community organizations: Third Year Gaal : 208 2nd Year Milestone:140 1st Year Milestones 70 3. Affirmative Action ` 7o continue the functioning of existing community affirmative act on'com- ,' . mittees to monitor school districts compliance with affirmation action plans and programs, or secure an adoption of an acceptable . affirmative action plan. (Specific goals and timetables are included n the individual area council objectives). A. San Pablo/Parchester ARea Council To have obtained a commitment from the Richmond Unified`School District to adapt an acceptable Affirmative Action Program.and- to hire a percentage ofminority teachers, counselors and administrators las defined in the goals and timetables of the existing Affirmative Action Pian submitted to the RUSD and not accepted in 1975 by the School Board see attached Goals and Timetables) through the means of mobiiization'of community support and actlf�ln.> `. Third Year Goal : see attached Goals and timetables 2nd YearMilestone: Ist Year Milestone: � N r., Tr o� covy O/V TNIS DOCUMENT UNSAT/S�ACTORY AT T11v4F 0� M/CROFIL MING a•.,r L'� C�• -v r��»+' - co v .},i „ .•y� ._ -.. is « :? C�>;O.+� N G7Gt .+ NOS: -Nr+ .n '.7P1 u • .-i,•= �ti t'y C tom•�l t'� .Al tR1�. W' tJ f,` '`z,- .. -r.• ... Q _..t Q• 'O-C.1`d �N N ..�..- it O :L r+•e t f. =, \7- tsl -N h Vt _ "Pt•.. N �•`y,X. p •..-+ G�An: N t+ ,Q L_",,,t f7 P7w. .0 - _ ,& - f •"� ,,,_,,. y>wy, .:.-►( .: +.. r-: �. .J• c�i 1 .••t�,,,- 'N rt,UY ='C? C�-%, tp .,{ .+ r• t7 rid _ r. ;.t -7 t`1_vl s .41 v....43 -.- � .:` -• -�' .Ci,..+-C? - O ,:t•. >',,•'. a �� _y.• 4_sT.r"T C.1 O Q `C� C"J' CS."�."'ti•"`;O u L/'7. ,tG• 21+„Qco a! z• O .-s 'O Q} � .•+ O''_ +��: N.r -�..p� .•t i'" tDj ��t}"'�=.r y„1 l��-t.� :ti.•.""t �T_w nte..r - t�+.w.•; c't-^.: ,:' t4•.t7.: .. TS .•.t �_��• _ '.� ,•-.�' �Y,+:�. t -{ .j.t...3 "TM .+.r�.�. iti. :�p.�."•+�. ,-:r-+lt - _•C"' .C...:_�,,, t,l p:.'' tom.«"'�-. �f �:""��'`:.: •.•-S y�'! :ht t•,'- - ^' _ «.•.�• -..r, .-r.y ._•�,,, -Li ta. y N .•�:,..• �.+'•''„• int.J i .:;C%{' vt., .r-•y Q Q•".-. <7 Co•...'""'.!; N^..� tri•:`'�--L'1 &nV-1 �::� a ',..3 '- •Mz` �a%'-, i..+v:..^� '� -'*� _'."{`•"^.z•S h.. h O ttl Ct sr-.._,-+- t-1 f U1 is-rM J" .-tY �+ G as p - t "•-- ---, r:.n.- r _s- • r "� - `� ^'t -..t r'•7 O N t�r..•3 to Vl. r '.Y C -•c z. to """'' - a.r+.•4r _.,„'`ter='•.s 1 ti s«t'_ ."`•»7 - N-. �•�•+t-• .7 Q"w •iA - J"•+R,s! y g.+w..- ..i.-•Jr.^' r^.:t!a. - ..'„� .{ t•+•,.,'. �^r`_-;� - .. :' .. . i-•a-a. +.t C :�T7 r s„ -.•.. M+'� .�w.ss,..+C..s.v.. �. ^�- ,O (r ,.i:'r �...:s •«tea. �..Y'� +LC j,'s :T+.v tr'- .0-A '.-i r s- /, ��a. Y•MF'i'.r'nf.�� ': .. ° '•�•CC.ft^ �? t'1 O F+r- r'�'tr► _ w"►N ...• ,►�.4t- 1,e. C •41 u ft :,, "� ryr • +�..ar IrR Ca U tv. t;} f'►-:. 0 .rt+7 r"!N•._ r..-.w..C.+i s�.•.� L QT w; Z- _w.+� �'c '' N f +{! t"L it'�.. �7y cy .,.> -•'. w,=+.s _ t"')'•.. t ^..,.%K 'M•4'f sir. p F� ";t '.x`i.�1, :t:::,.y i•i.,•, ' G' CX ttl x... .-t•�r-S tV a a.r r. . O%=r.: _ -- w.0 es ._ �„y...,•_,'„� r�',}'--y �� E.y _ .. tiT wD C\ h p\-.•+�'.- -�.,r'1 =ww^. C3 _•b U C tt.t.�^�.x.s,� f L ••emGa"' d _ : , h N n- :: .: ttS to *• _ ..s ? O G_:•r �c i _c f !¢ - - '`:•:�_�`+." --t,_.._«�-^�. •."r'•v!+.,..�'. ,-,Y N _..rt.: -.C:.x-+ ar �+• •..t. V C -yr + '� •~� 5,.-^L�•�*;t'Z .p Y _ « - �+.i (,� -'"J-•-i .__"'. f»`ham -%•.:' •:.L-, !r.••��:•'�', �5 •'T.:✓ �_�.�. = J •^i u+t y_`_".�-.'' '" ._'''r'.' `i1•i+.1.1'C'�-..w.G Lt-..i..•.>•��.a• ..• _"a i - - -+ •7 cmc ti_ -Q 4 y.c' c o'_ Ls'.G u : 4a 1, A -4 '� U't t -* x • .-. - -• - vs Sr•i # tJ to' -•L...•r' �.•- t....3 t 7.r f- %0 r x/••-- w. r,,,}' t"t=7 O r <::N C4 I-- � J- ...�3 G C3 si �, y,,, '''�•i"`w-•:4. •' -j..`' L: t iI -.•-t r� - O ..C't�.:y;,a,. �'r••-.z r «-^+'�''-••+ '.. :. .0 - -'•'t w'7 t"f '+,.. N b-� :.D ,t4 # +d -4 tit y �` ""'+ -tom --. �•• •Z.V-» _' _?. 4.4•04 ,A V Gf L3 -,-. •+. t .-c. • _ '-'1 L'7 .,C` .h ^,- �"• -.: O � � h v,. 'V�-r.N'� O .p. try...+'..l• :C tK .. t v .•a•. --+t cs CM -4�, _, to N a..Q xa r- -a .-+ V`t NQ h N rt") U"! vl.., f V -+•r C O L :r ^,R7: +' �.mow•, '•i•=rY -,y' .- 4 ._--•I - ._ - to :N .,� ;, is U Lt L• a•t z�:� :. > .,.,a_` f ,�„ 4. '""`,✓ jft}{ -. _ r,,._ :' `•' i ,'.S - p G # sR .q+ 1r t.,1r-C' O .'4r h.q Q C• ;-- p•# "p.p. U cos sc x ,. � _'}'• CO r. LV'.-t=' ?e! y-O'CQ-4 r 4 4 a.1•C.#•Lr .+ a.t .=T: i+r?�1• •w••+.,x.Y^' ";•Y: .-t C• 4 -4 q «w r w «y-� [: r ►.X+y^ .. •.- _: z�•: y �:� =Q '�-U.ty.t•Q H- p 'C> =�.•.. wr _.."' .`'t•f�. r •..` ✓ � rr a , CI _4 C C\ -: o C% p � — N 3 1' •t•. Ctu3 ,t..a •+'{ -•.--+ _,tn .: -D '-Z: Z1 a -Q -4.-C -Ly N z1 :rte. .- ^`D v 'C�.Lpt u .'.•": r•r4=-rte»``- �'r"? • LM 'v+_' C4-en Ul wl �•`_ N .-• - .+r _ h •up Q •f•0 Q 04 4j a, :�' t.' s -}';r..:'_:• tr'. _ � _ .-t _..•� _ :cV .•...r � Ct L si - O l+ +Lt ',fit •s } ti r.,-�t.y--.�.T•;r.,:;,;c • L7 - ._. , "'. s, .. 's __:: •C o'1 •-1 '"'. •u p 7r +.Y J: �� ,i ,,.s,;- `•y:�=r'. u U p C. C rt- t. 17 se ` co ''+ 0 Ls i•`,:•!'"'z, C - 4 -. ..•rr• Y...�{ C _ t:,! C Q C:CO►:.$4 Kt 'a _s , rs,� y„r*.+rr;,•_.'if ' � .. x--i 2-..•: .: G r••��i td -r �.L _¢'G a •.pi .•t Ls-ia-IC• i' s 7'_.f �s'�•' t','.��-'r`"..,'.. u .� `"" C .. _` tl '._' '.{•� u -. ..�•• �.• y i n O v tp },3•'=` mss...--_�"• %a -c.""z'j•'Y ,f'i _ Cf .«,,.L ...t-C Mme. �,�.•w 3 f j" - �� -' ,.. t.,,, 0.i-...,p •.J'jr- +1/ -1.3 ti•t • -�.r..co;..� f•+ . . •r "'�'i - r, .;"U-�' j}!t _•..'.T+ Q:. tr---•Gt_-t•. - ��•„ CT_D s r r 's- _s _ >4 ' :�t► ...44 cttt N �.'s C3 4CG' +••.C+re}:.:��rv�M-r•x..'r=`�'''_:,�;.�.r -w.y.-�a ,mss--•.'7+�,:�s�..+,�•y'.. •�.'t�+{ '(..: .,r Ci.��.:+-.-- y....�..'•'+z-"` - "'"�`�. - •! .i"-»��j"--!'�'�.` `,el•"f •=•f v rc'y # ,1+•- !H ..• ru •".•7 it"# 't`-• t! +races, '"'i....�;tl.L..a •a_., S. 4t ice+.- .'ii.•a.tl ._•'• '`�iY-..-t N C't-"S•11..�^�.a..�.+'�,-,rL,y..n.•�. ',,.�,.t-_.c. ,,..-� •�. .'3 D %a.0 o i.i _O w ri O t) L ..-•C .,+--•'ct"'t'7 a«rUA < CS .,,,, as .X- �„•,,;..+�... • ._ C .• o w ..7- -t:t D tb. :.''a «+ as w_.1 tsd•""_� t1-, � :w,: .-+1'.-' Kh�;�,•v:� ESM v t,)..G n tJ ri , i,u tn wr- -wia.._f...-+ Cs s.a 'yy L+. • - s. -"^-'�A -��4M •y-t•"F� ""'" u •-t v v. 'L.7.a1 - C.]_:,a,-i.? U CJ _ s gn-u W3,' • Y ,� �,,.. .t-w r i _ Z +7 f -.t3' p cs C't- tt •r, p :i 'C Q to d -s �'»f `�+� WiffiL `' - ^, _'r - ,w,. 1-yx. � •'i�w"�v..._- s. �--c y t •_-��--~i•-�Y;-+y;, "'x•�.;,,' � y'�•�.. -."� .,c!-...r i :4 X��tia..•,.1��,r=z=. '�.��=�'tt- «.`�—� `�n"ti S _. '•+a-.i='.^�� '- �..}�.V„�.+� :T�f"�� Page 13 Page 6 of Education D. Central Area Council To continue the functioning of the West Pittsburg Affirmative Action Ad Hoc Committee which will have representation from at least 3-5 minority and/or ccmmunity groups. By September, 1976 at least 30% of the teacher/counselor/administrator openings of the Mount Diablo Unified School District will be filled by minorities: (10% Mexican-Americans; 10% Black; 10110' Women and Other Minorities) for the first year. The committee wiil monitor anti help to assure that the MDUSD is In compliance with the District's Affirmative Action Plan and Program. Third Year Goal : at least 50% minorities 2nd Year Milestone: at least 469 minorities Ist Year Milestone: at least 301;'minorities Ethnic Breakdown: Percentage of openings fi<lled by minorities Third Year Goal: 16 2/3p for each minority group 2nd Year MIIestono:7377-3% Ist Year Milestone: 10 C. Pittsburg Area Councl I : The Pittsburg Affirmative Action Advisory Conomittee to the Pittsburg Unified School District (PUSD) will assure ttfat an update of the PUSD Affirmative Action Plan is completed to meet the guidelines of the California State Department of Education. The Committee will monitor the PLISD compliance with the Afflrmative Action Plan so that at least 25% of the openings in classified and in teaching/ counseling/administrativo positions are filled by minorities. Third Year Goal : See PUSD Affirmative Action Plan 2n' Year Milestone: Sarxxa Ist Year Milestone: Same 4. G.E.D. AND ADULT EDUCATION To refor or aLvocate or directly provide G.E.D. or adult education classes -h:, low-i nrxne persons who have not completed high school or received their high school diploma. Third Year Goal : 180 2nd Year MitestcGe: 125 Ist Year Milestone: 70 00lu I , Page 7 of Education page 14 A. Southside Area Council To refer low income persons to existing G.E.D. classes to develop educational and academic skills toward the obtainment of the high school equivalency certificate. Third Year Goal : 75 2nd Year Milestone: 50 1st Year Milestone: 25 S. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council I. To provide aptitude and achievement testing to determine the level of instruction needed by target area a-lults who will enroll in adult education classes, as measured by standardized tests 2. Target area adults to have participated In classroom instruction leading to successful completion of their educational goals, to be based on their test results and their contracted level,of achievement. Third Year Goal : 45 2nd Year Milestone: 35 Ist Year Milestone: 25 3. Target area a.3ults to have successfully achiove their educational goals, as measured by the original standardized test scores and their contracted level of achievement. Th i rd Year Goal : 15 2nd Year MI leston-.: 10 lst Year Milestone: 5 C. Pittsburg Area Council : To advocate that the Pittsburg Unified School District provide G.E.D. preparation class for the non-English sneaking residents of the target area (instruction in the students native t^ngue) Third Year Goa I : 60 2nd Year Milestone: 40 ist Year Milestone: 20 o01os page 15 Page 6 of Education 5. Educational Information/Basic Skills To provide educational Information and specific skills (identified in the individual area council objectives) to designated client groups (identified in the individual area council objectives). Third Year Goal : 540 2nd Year Milestone: 300 Ist Year Milestone: 180 A. Southside Area Council To provide educational information and basic educational skills to low income Senior Citizens and the physical-ly handicapped adults which will enable them to take advantage of existing Senior Citizen and Physically Hanelcapped adults which will enable them to take advantage of existing Senior Citizen and Physically Handicapped programs as well as prepare them to more adequately handle their own personal and financial matters as measured by pre and post testing of their basic educational skills. Third Year Goal : 90 2nd Year Milestone 60 Ist Year Milestone: 30 B. North Richmond/Iron Triannie Area Council : To provide educational information about community services and survival skills to target area residents especially low income and minority residents who are on welfare and senior citizens through the roans of referrals,classes, workshops and appearances before community organizations. Third Year Goal: 300 2nd Year Milestone: 200 Ist Year Milestone: 100 C. San Pa51o/Parchester To provide personal, family and educational counseling and complem- entary activities (recreational, cultural and social) to 150 youth,especially low-income and minority youth, to assist them in remaining In school and/or to continue their education for at least one year. Third Year-oal : 150 2nd Year Milestone: 100 Ist Year Milestone: 50 0010J Wage 9 of Education Page i6 6• Cultural Enrichment/educatlonal trips ` TO Provide}cultural hrx)Qr'me for- 7 ,B ;'w Page 16 Page 9 of Education 6. Cultural Enrichment/educational trips To provide cultural programs for youth (7-14) and adult cultural enrichment and educational trips for Senior Citizens and the Spanish Speaktng - target groups). Third Year Goal : Youth- 175; Adults - 150 2nd Year Milestone: Youth - 25; Adults - 100 Ist Year Milestone: Youth - 100; Adults - 50 A. Central Area Council : 1. To provide cultural program for youth aged 7-14 in the form of speakers,rnulti-cultural classes, field excursions (i.e., the Expioritorium, Golden Gate Park, DVC Planetarium, the De Young and Oakland Museums) Third Year Goal : 175 different participants 2nd Year Milestone: 125 different participants 1st Year Milestone: 100 different participants 2. To provide cultural enrichment/educational trips for adults with emphasis on senior citizens and the Spanish Speaking to the form of: Education-as-second-language (ESL) classes, art classes, consumer education, dance classes, rap discussion groups and field excursions (i.e. , theatre, concerts, cultural centers, etc.) Third Year Goal : 150 different participants 2nd Year Milestone: 100 different participants 1st Year Milestone: 50 different participants 7. Recreation To establish a recreation program for youth aged 14-21 through the ; 1 €, i robilization of existing recreational resources. Third Year Gaal : 200 2nd Year MI Iestr;no:150 1 st Year til 1 estone: 00 A. Central Area Council: To establish a recreation program for youth aged 14-21 , which Includes Indoor/outdoor sports: basketball , volleyball , chess and poo) tournam,ants, arts and crafts, and films through the means of mobiliz- ation of existing recreational resources, resulting in an increase of youth participation of Ambrose Park by: Third Year Goal : 25% increase 2nd Year Milestone:20% Increase lst Year Milestone:l5% increase Third Year Goal : 200 2nd Year MI lest--ne: 150 — Ist Year Milestone: 100 Resource mobilization of existing recreational resources will be measured by an Increase in participation of the Ambrose Park by youth 14-21 as corDared with 1975 baseline data. 00110; page 17 MULTI-YEAR PLAN OBJECTIVES 1975-1978 TPUMSPORTATION 1 . Transportation Services To provide regular or routed transportation services to target area residents (specific destinations, schedule, client`groups, and numbers served are included in the individual area council objectives). Third Year Gaal: To be determined 2nd Year Milestone: To he determined 1st Year Milestone: To 5e determined T+. Rodeo/Crockett Area Council: To provide regular transportation to the residents of Port Costa/ Rodeo/Crockett area at a price comparable to other municipal transit systems (25c); serving at least 201.) persons per month, consisting of one mini-bus on a schedule from Port Costa To Richmond, on regularly spaced runs with various stops from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. , tionday through Friday; at the end of the six month demonstration period, the results of this project will be used by the County Public Works Department toward setting up a more permanent county-wide transit systema Third Year Goal: 7,201) 2nd Year "ii l estone_ 4,MN1 lst Year Milestone: 2,00 S. To provide a personalized local mini-bus system, to serve 500 clients per month or 5,000 nor year. Third Year Goal : to 5e determined 2nd Year Milestone: to be determined ist Year Milestone: 6,0nM C. Central Area Council: To provide transportation service through the matching of OEO funds with State and Federal mass transit monies. Third Year Goal: to be determined 2nd Year Milestone: to be determined 1st Year Elilestone: to he determined 001 U MULTI-YEAR PLAN OBJECTIVES Page t8 1976-1978 DIRECT SERVICES l. Direct Services To provide direct or neighborhood services to designated target client groups in specific service areas (client groups and service areas are included in the indiviCval area council objectives). Third Year Goal : 1,851 2nd Year Milestone: 1,250 1st Year Milestone: 550 A. Pittsburg Area Council : T. To upgrade the existing senior citizens centers by providing to senior citizens in each of the two the following services: a.arts and crafts b.vehicular transportation for users of the centers c.interpretation and translation for the Spanish Speaking d. staff who can cornn�unicate with clients served Third Year Goal : 15n 2nd Year Milestone: inn lst Year tiilestone: 50 2. To provide a multi-cult+.ral and human relations activity, at least twice a year for all ethnic groups, to he a coordinated effort of all D`lerate Agencies in the target area, resulting in: 1. increased cultural awareness 2.reduction in conflict 3. attitudinal change Third Year Goal : 21)n clients 2nd Year Milestone: 154 clients lst Year Milestone: 104 clients 3. To provida direct one-to-one supportive services in the areas of translation, transportation, referral , interpretation and aivocacy to low income disadvantaged and the non-English speaking comrwnities; these supportive services will fall in the categories of housing, health, legal services, social security and any supportive services requested. Statements of quality are in the process of being defined. Third ' Year Goal : 75.1 clients served; 1500 services 2nd Year "i1estune: 5GI clients; 10nn services lst Year milestone: 25g clients, 500 services i Page 19 Page 2 of Direct Services A. East County Area Council : To provide direct one-to-one supportive services in the areas of translation, interpretation, referral and advocacy to the tow income, disadvantaged and non-English speaking community of' East County, not to exclude requests from any other area. These supportive services will fall in the categories of: 1. Employment (Manpower) 2. Transportation 3. Interpretation 4. Translation 5. Housing 5. Immigration 7. Legal services a. Youth 9. Senior Citizens 10. Nutrition 11. Advocacy 12. Emergency Food 13. Education/Vocational Counseling 14. Job Training 15. iiedical/Medical Services 15. Social .Security 17. And any supportive services requested. Statements of quality are in the process of being developed. Third Year Gaal individual client-750;ci i eats-1 ,5fV);servi ces-Or,50n 2nd Year Milestone: 500; 1,000 3,000 1st Year Hi i estone: 250 500 1,500 'M13 CJ 1.-- Z 1.1 i C_ rJ 1 O W t7 O t0 d cc � ej ! — 'O 0 3: +- E .- U > a ci. 1 } C u — � > ;�� ,. • U 04. 0 0 1 coo a 0-3 �1: 1 O -_- I !- C tD — OU O d N-- O N E >- t �• �^� •� U L 0— 0004- •t- >_ C1— a t7 i•- G 1 :t� O L O.- t11 t0 Z7 CLL O O O L— t0 O L C G t tr '�L• a- Cr-Ot+-— }-- O. C O O U— U t7f O O.u. �- L U C.93 , '0 .- } a d 0.0.. L U O 00 "r 117 �•j a L U U O f r C -f- U d :: - o O L L U y fJ > tt ooaAa > CMfs..00a00C1— t u co ` •-: N . ht7 O h Tia O L 7 a'o — tA'a F. a C tB-- a v S } u mot O a — x O— C 0.1-- - a 0 U :3 00 tt atfF- > au X0U > ..tO U •s- 0 to O•i- C C a O O d N �W ; f- L�.• C• QO.adi- t-1 a O:1•-- L N CJ -yJ c. .. �.. r Ogo - C� I c •a: ci ?• - - :3 i . f C c t o ear. = I u n a C o y J r- 4 3 0 7: x a Z J V j C! O = C3 u +t •.r• = C.0 J . r .- •-: J r a.V wML J L0 C C. O w •• r. V C to _ 1 C 2 9 C: C: J .y G U j ;. 11 t U 7 •� C -rf :. ..i O 1J O O cO - v L 7n F O 1_�- .= 0 G > ZJ .7 .^. u C CA Q = U C C F i� O T. C O :.t X 7 J > O O T dJ ? r1 ..Gt yCj f j in C ; - 4 •.; •^i �+ 3 c! o C C C w r_ O -- ___ ._. . :I3 � Cs f ! O C:• C C.J - rY. O0 t0 •a'f t 94 U W C •O ? $1 t0 .-1 r•! o -U E us to 93 is 00 ada ca `-C 94 b 41 O i:. N > k 99 -j Ci- O P. U u 0 to U 000+0 C O r-1010u ' i as •.a E 0 U w _, •a N ^ N O E Zi O a- n4 O •a r ci is !t: v1! t` U 3+ w O G sJ O u 'C A U W u to V > f- 1 e o C •• u E a U4 " b 2e oC! 3i W u rt ova O f» C_- h gyp, s,• o n e o t9 t33 o W •+Od ci C: 0 0 vi CO c O C3 -,i > d O $+ •if G C E >V U G G f!!O 47 9.14 3+ S !.' .-i = L 41 -.t O ri 3 -.i a� 3+ O t►C 1 W .-t .moi 1 3- 3•t E 3 O E ZJ O 1"3 C3 C3 •• 43 O E a U4 0 > k O O41 p 99 ,• 41 O O Ai 44 t3 a > O +I -A Ora $1 G O U tJ a9:6 u J U sn Sod 3s• u1.1U Qa,is1CUkn Hcs C. -t3 p U 7 n W +f.•4 O •d -rf O " U r- t3 c..�+ -J ^ $+.-I O r. .-1 t o E t%+ to 1- 0-%, U *,% O O ^ CS w U C CJ 01 r I 1 t 0 ! z i Q' W o 1 G 4A W 1 O O -.i is n t 34 0 sii o epi W .� E j A to :J .f s: .-t v t 3- to .4 _rfop u 41 -rt U P4 b W C C tiOl t2 70+ U O G O `�O'• y t V .I 0 .4 .-f R.O O R• •C? 34 U-rf O 130 C C3 O C3 AS. O W U % Oy a 0 0.0 O ! � O ! O u3 -d Aj-rl 00 O U a E -rt o 14 1 O 3•' i y > L'"-ri C!to .0 S a.1 :.1 :.f 1 G C CC _r4 7 U.t C3 02 O 1-t U _rf 43 14 • i C3 d i d d O c0! O at E .G O O t + O o +1 3+ n -o c0 Um U C. E " v 0-A vt to$1 1 7 i v 3 G+OI o 411 O r•1 O O at k 11 ej U0P. G4C� OO %4Y1 OTf •0 y-V yCJ qUO . . . %An •d L 3, ttl .-1 C 1 " ' a 1 0 E VI .cs us to 1 1 U 0 i +1 u 3+ 93a0 o O u 4J4J93 au O0 c -o tz asoix- owuz: u 0 C3 ri C- 1~ as u $4 _ ci U Ca,rf >.u O t+ U tN O U•f to G -rI t:s f-t u w a OO 1 E ° n :-1 n U U :J G -ri -O O .-i 0 U ¢.t 00 :4 U M C. O ci C G a ' U •d = >+ 1 •rf •0 r- •.'f U 3+ O •rf • G i.1 93 r_ h iO i 4.1 r- o — CI-4 L O C: 3+ 3 w >• >. U 34 L tJ >. m U .-f O E to (Ia. v ^ 1 C3 U +f U p O G 0 0 0 s1 ti t:: 1+ 3+ +i C >• U W U tr a u O- G•a >,i1' +1 sJ G .+ aU •rt >rf3+ GGG000 :� 0oUu 4JCU :�00 c %A : ,f G >. :3 t :. .'S -.i -.+ -.� •rt > t0 G:-. +f tr > •4 L r - >u J G O ,rf A U U q rf O is C3 .ti _Y. .+ G U C .-f ,4 z L O 0 �-a r_ E U S n G b > tti S E O u U y G a .-i 0 u C) -.! 0 -4 -4 ri 0 C U 3. C3 C O -O y E �-a 1 -O 3a >+ 7 sJ is a. A G U t1 U V +t u y i tz '7 S_ t`J i 0 010 a O G n C3 044 v w t0 O tz O -Ci M 0 > -ts J U L! C3 i sJ U U > U G O 3+ U Ci CO 1 r. .0 C u G :3 O G a U -rt :J -0 -A G +•I •••t O U U C. O G O i% q SJ M r.. ao rf rt -0 E O r- v .1•t JJ. U ' a +f .J -.1 0 t,,• -rf U O P Cr.C L 96 U •r1 y Li U = .-3 r•,{. .• .N► v .. — lO.. 13 " > ..1 I G ,r4 > t.3 a G 1J G w u ! G +I +I :C U c3 U sJ . s^ G t. 0 ti O G :' O t•! 3 O U -O i• L O aJ C3 7 O Cs U 3 O U :. t. > n >,+ sa U J t r{ C = 3+ = •r =t r to ai .t: O .t: C. O 3+ t O •,r+ 44 :3 CC p U C3 C t:.--•t sr a'-� O V. U ;a U4 C3 -.1 C3 C JJ u r•1 J W CS IE AJ •.1 C:C•"r- t3 V >= r UJ s-a ' t-s >- t I U. f.: C3 O 1- s-3+ •wa o X-f L 0 114 t C`1 ig t1 4J c _ ; in s0 0-'O - t-- tt p 4- 4-- O - Q-a'- U 3,c: d ¢ a 1 U ul i Q O a m G'tu O N N O C N N 0 >Us i ci + ( p L O— U >%c L N L. cc O a C E 0 >-•d `�- vi c r p 4 N :7 cZ tl? L 0— O ia— v0 L It O 00+- �1 a L a CL -r4 • �'V ' 10 — O E C t- Q i- -0 E O ai- y a� .Y a 0 O O a 0 O .K N 04- 0 a O C O + '' O N -0 U Q N fir-q-.N O fl � s1 C`i N 14 a t- >- 10•- o C U i- lti N >— E O C � 04 ' j r- a t uaaa +- s--- > O 0a "O0Q.0 w i � � U � 4m > = c0' >— LV cn> focJE :1 c O 1 00r- } 00 >-i. w U OL O 0 G c go � c Lab ut� C1 ; tV F• UJ N N -o 0= N E +-. t- C� _ C _ .^. ^__ C to a^ c G 1 ta f+ J O ? Si C ^ t a :i. :4 O O O C ' i� • .rl :.1 :S .^ > L O L Z y 6 y, sn 1 U c Tt O w m 0 L) ( L 3.7 / c •-+ci 3 Com+ m > a/ it CCi C a I .i u c a ai 34 m U O t+ v I = ::7 wawa crJTiau -aa f 7 :J ^3 •� G c Yi a ri a ss 0 .0 u .:] sJ ii w a a +i a -0 a { .G C C% I a c > ° = c µ• G a E u r = r. i j = f- E a C) .c u E-• -U sa O a = .i c a e- G c"'; + •-+ t/3 G7 C c r+ .+ �, a :v a a a a tl M o --f V E A d=ri :{ ad - p ' O a .c c) O + w Rs O Rt' U c1 C) fC J i i Si+ a E A 3 w to at Q ss- ..`- G t� x =" c C. O ai St =:-z+t 'O ti G W Q a J M $4 a w ,D .ts w .-t a -Ot Is ti L w x O H E a •-f v-4 f+ E O w ss w .-i Ci E".- p G ( d .-1 !+ E O a c� a U E'a C.i r-f r i r t a cz cJ ^O a. aS f+ r t O O -A -rt -A 4J O .G 93 L C) a U O ss .,i O C� Tf O c: v) a3 u41 C c2cD 4j $4ww •a u � � E, tar I G ti cs ,rt u 0 +i O W � to O 1=- to 010 a -ri O. v c: 1 t- 'ti c r- U.4 O -w o a 0 w E .-1 w o 0 a t~ a rt �, � ss 1 C ri: N -rd O 41 -r+ -A a c .a A f, �s .-t a ss U.4 o -, O a u O E ,ri a s -a C. A-ri u c) 'O a r- t; O ,i v 0 g.C = c3. C t! K :.t -ri a U ss 1-1 a u a > O > aU E >"tit .U a u F. O L a .ts y A > +-1 o a 43 .-t a a a a E j+I �"". j' �' < a•-i -0 ' ^ E14 ss -d ss 3 a U) C3 � , u a O .a rc O 4 a ,rt � CCJ O �C --a a Lut •L O n C. a > ^ = � cJ r-t is r-f n > e% U O w k n •-i a O $4 of O a O cn u .r O 0 .0 a In -rf .D � � U p a w ca,C J E v t3. t3- �/W U -A 41 v w �/ w a O k' �/ L v r 1 N co r► q CJ c i � 14 9.6 0 .0 UU i.r `z C a 44 o cu1 ,+ w -0 o toC .; u 34U o o ~ s a 'Wi a s -a A w.- v r-1 E 0 -1 a � v u c � f to to a vauS- to A = < a = C oQ a R OO 00 00Ad ,r4 -A .-7 a C✓.. ad -ay o U °w -Auo raf OCS. s+ r-1 G b s W t-I g.�-� p O O a -rf a y so O a -A 0 � >, Vr r-1 W -A t a U W a .a eco to -'+1 a U g -O u-4 'a a •ri y o i; a ! > N O O ACJ • O U T E O -rf Z; -.4 1J i a r•i 9 ri .D N is > a .a -a --a 44 1.6 O '> M a s a c 0 O `d C a f, a a 1" O w a O a f+ W U a to -a 1 C >- a0 0 L a 1 -r1 O r- >%L A•ri O u r; a > Q -ri A y CL-0 a ++ v-i o a A.1 w ' a A M L is aa to a O w � to O w cs. 'V = -a k a ,r1 ,rf N a b !i y 0 0 -A -r1 ! � o ci a u 0 a C -+j 0 0 L 0 V- U fn i 0 w > •ri y C. r-i u U U 0 4A 3a cs H 'ri •ri > - E a U U L` a - a 0 > -4 w r it c.9 » o c. u p -a R. r ci • a oaooi+ Cso -aasoaau C ci 41 O N E C icEi � E " a s s. C) a E 4 J sJ a O N .i t: • N t L T J W c; i O cn � C r 0 r— 1 -r•-r- CJ ro ji = c r—v . L -4 ° X115 O £ u Q __- C O 'o { 'Oaf+ .' i .a -:+ a cq Outtoa Cu. . c � .� a to+,i a .:t cs C-.4 u 4i $4 f+ f4 a 14 $4 O tQ { tx 0 to tti CCM *•- to 54 4i $4 C a 0 -4 q k u a r4 to w a u -4`r a 4.4 $4 a t +O Ci o a +4 "'-9-a a R q X .^•.-Q 000 q 44 44 R4 CO+4 •, .- U « ri a v a 41 cs si-C •a be-r4 sa .. -"4.0 s4 ^^. O m A a 010 •a & s+ ,� a > o -r, � •C o � o a. •cs n .a a s+ $4 cl ^t 2 o s 4'i w 03 43 .-4 > 4i A 3 m '? 0 q •a S= t3. O -A C { tttn U -I o .O a :i a O -r1 CO s+ 3 .0 4�•Ci s4 .-4 C 43 u O �1, CL I i O .~. ^ .rs4u C . •• _jaaOu riaaf+ $4l M -4 Q si r:C- u r- =) .t, L r� OttF .r4 s4 n o > O 0 0*k +r4 + O.14 47 > V4 ts s4�+ -r4 q > 0 .'G O : ri O 4 O 0 S'J q G .4 q 0-4 3 • a O •" S - -444 a q 4i $4 a u $4 W-C OS s- a f+ -o ,•i a. 3.4 M A U ai c' O u a 04.6 f+ ri O 4� h s^ zJ r0 47 >r is 3+ sa u C-r4 t" h o .�G a q'�. +++' "a a c Ci C to O G 43 t44 C �4 4-► i t Ci r. a 0 4) a 41 : 4i 43 r4 0 r' +► C3 4•'i > Z 0 -4 ti > L O Cr 3 C eQ d 0 r3 r4 43 :'% > M4J 43'C > W 4 clr" '4 r3 -J t t-.4 = Li r4 O r4 O U O a el Ci U - t3 u .'. 0 $4 d si fr' 0j.G 1t-4 t* is O a U .-i :». O C -i? C • -SG +f C 7 .G w Qi a O -A a rt a4 td tti G a . U.to o s3 -4 ft O 0 to a 0 . 13 44 u ,a -7 r- 0 O •4 tt"4 a a a ++ a O, .: 4:4 -#4 ti CA qt CO sr.�s 0 r4 0 C - U a Cint C .V c.. ,. .. ., .� .� .._4•..i►.it to bC £-+ O a+ cs. 3 r3 43" A q r-!;4-ii"'d' O si` cor 4 { s. 1 ,tet a v v chi •ai a3 L ra i.t{ t o S3 m C rS r^i u u t S. u t I 4 a C! J t Ct Ott? O ; C r- S- qS ,� ^• y -r4 Q Q t1 Cal +-f i+ v. ; S_ sl Vl 0 -.4 o 4 O cr4 rpt • '+� 4'i t 'L3 '3. u .9 ^-. 0 v u-4 $4 Jd ySS "M "�• C 4) t3 G !o`.-.r- �'+ E4 C- In 'n" O E sr Des$ O I w 444 41 O 3 t -5 J T a d 5 s. Ci 4:W ^ ^�!+qi 94 C ? v4 t a a 4 41 a i.i C J " r4 r-t 4.4-ri. q +t q U Z+ [` O s^+ U r 4 4 0a 414 p -0 4q r-4 $4 q -r+ rz i3 -J a--WO. 1 a'J t a E • n tai 0 -4 -40 � a u �. eai &J 42. 4 3410 -14 -0 so CL-rot -0 W 9.ras o Vi a: Tr,+• ° � v C ;sE WCW00t* 0 s+ u. C o 4 .a si i co 41 co 1: 93 u O aYi 4i -at.4 In ti a t: w 43 sa 3 .. 4q .ai .C e-i N w fa -ir4 a ; � 4C U D O O cl a > E is O ti C3 q . }�•- 4.•1j ti 4r -.Oi 3 0 "4 3 O C -r4 4 r4 q 44 a u &a-r4 0 r4 Z 0 4:4 t 4i -- to ?4 • f4-H-4.C M1 �+ Ci 'a -r4 u b .'"7 U a 0 %2 a a 4: 'A-r{ is � C3.Q 44 C C3-r4 C: #-f Ci:a: -y c4 w f4 = a 14 C O to C s4 "4i O 34 i.4 ,r4 •Ci tx O C W a V O "tf x +- 4j. - w rt4.�tcvr •i w .sCr-t -r{ rG : O -o4 es e $+ tFcE o ,i . +q CZA ato,* •t +14 ri q a a S.; O- O %+ 0 cs s= O f+ ct-ck E ;: 0 tj Wac{4Ui0,, ,. Ca 34 CII a•O P. el a r+i 3 tt t1 q aNO In bCO O A U r4 :0, 44to : C O u a u ~ r4 u r4 J w OO . rqva " a acv 44 $4 v Et%.o 0. 0 O L-a1 rrr4C •044u -r4 q tRC 0 -0 O G40 E C a U a O ou a 0 t . to 0w to > -G -� O v -W4 > C 43 o 41 4 o to 00 40 �'► a '•- t31 4i 4 0.IN E 0 A Cd to M= tt7 C e-4 i a:i 7 t:3 43 U " a -A } xv 43 40 •3 -ri O r!"i E-4-4 y tJ ip4 . `0 O �` U C m -r4 0a > u .4 .� sem.. o � 04ad � AJtsCr � ruS'� s4 C, 4A c: u C si a O st to a r4 U`" E4 $4-A 0 41 a r* ::b { cl 0 43 WA I N E COf fi i >" f4 4- •4* fsy ti $4.0 c3 -} O 00U 9 C. 44 rt OC ' .i C +i INC. a 14 E s to O ja, t4 C rost O + aaa� V 0 a-4 a LOa "4 o 40 M o -A s .O -4 �. v�- C 4i v • 4:3 q < s+ ra i.t O O E-r4 a > E' O a � CI 3 tt 41 td 4:-1 V rl q a "O -r4 Z t3 •G t3 43 -1 u O C) Si :i ri ".! t7' C' a u :- q a 4� a 4: 4s ? 3E a C o -C -4 ct O Q r4 L C3 a -rt >%T.4 C Ct U? ri W o FI & •%+.u'. f' rt w :3 u O a. •rl F .o C a r O xi O 4i W a CS •r4 4* -i r 4i JO Q C3 ti- cy is a 3-O'tt.. 4.4 .•. ri V J3 s4 U r-i O LO u a o LO - 34 O iO q aO - C { Vi vso > 43-vj C rLrec: ci40A OHi+ Ca fiW SE4 U s 'C E Ud u Vn a r0 a r4 a wU 00 C) r-r4 . � C "e } ti .-0 } 3 a Q -A CdE a .wG r4 CW 43 a 34 qO 0 a s CJ r{ .r4 J3 CO +i �. V yJ_ O 4j -r4 a .a f► r- a-.c O r4 r{r-L Ct 4j 4"i 0-%y 4 q. si 44. r3 N E- w• "' a E .IC ri A ar-r fs a�• r4 0 M a`^� .0 0 ,4%-0 v 43 Ci O ei •ss t*S tF4 Cj .� r-4 r -j III- 4 w to v � �n nq r.�^�-{ 0 .�.� �S may. �) �' `^' iG '` s �► ' .� r4 4' .. 0 Us�a too CO .4i q O' C C C ,a 4 ,� • +�4--- .CC7 tam- IM M t- 4-v C tOa 0CC � O 02, 0-0 a 0 Gi iti"" ;a 0 RAS� CM 41--- C G 4D C Q-'�'C1 L -G m O >-4- C G 4� C L C'Q C O r- 4- G-- O css to �1t �+- 4--0 !- m o •t- a y,y 41 i to-•s W .0 t- 43t 4t w tc Q at vim- -'- a u a i- 4-- to c c L 'a 4o Ct-- "_ a © 0 In O •- o--z o 4- 0 U a@ J ri 44 or L -O >=<u U ai L 3* t0 4t F- -�-tf iL•- O +0 4t .+� O Zi•O 4fi S. . g .00 C L ilt Cid -.,-o C--- C a... q - O Ilitn Ci +- q r43 !- L N 4Cl "? C'' N t i E tris au C O'c O 4 t? 13 13 " L a•` �" �a L }. c of N 4---... «. tt •"v d i- o Ot C.{- C 40 q C C L 42 4D-- L L O I. L g L O - G _ sem. C ' L�1 #- o > > 1A �t C C t- to a.OiQ L p A L S- J G L L7 P+ t± Q i- ••• L t0 Ci O► V C o a s"O X t- " ••. 3 as 0 L t- 4_-t 4:. O cc, 0 a O Q�L rIOS LqZ i�r- 0 .0- 4- < O 13 11 W i- t3 i- GL G tti Gil L o V/C� {'- •-'E L•i /� . •I -r'4 V C 1 F- .-i r1 JR t+ G L - OoI1 - � tw G >; O I v ----- -ri rI 1 L 31 "4 to .-i O .0 LJ r: CJ C3 G i w Ln O u JO L L U J L O :1 u CJ .%S L ry SJ f!! E '� U 1~ C1 U V r-.4 t) 0,ri -4 Si u •-+ � c t* - ^� {» .-i a A. E C ! t r- 0, :J U0 :2 L a ,.a -_ i+ Cy 4i is U a 'ri t'1 • ? , f U ; .< tT U u 1+ U U +.7 $ C! Ci j C2. U -i r s. O.. s~ O �+ k3 t3 C N r•! %+ C *' O W to u P. U := u :a tr � L. O a " G 43 I W I �! LJ 14 0 +i t+ c3 O r^.. C`I L C,i rt 7S O -u+ m p CL r ! a +,C- > r_ s Lam : r, Gu 0003 c, i eu C► O G T 3» a C7 e2 -.i r4 -r+ -A in rt T Q W CD Lw 0 -u. O -rt G 1 :.z-+ :4 N > t= O •-i 3 -4 :+ -u -1 14 +U ci -Q a .C- _^ + p �4t 13 O Si ri -1i -u u 3 > r-i t7 C3 --4 O :-& JJ Ul L ?j ��^s a-a r, t+it -'i -r+ � 0 i,Z w -.4-0 � C3 s: e.r. 34 V O Q !!! ' :iri i+ -ei ^J' vtit L C !$ LM O .0 .-! U Q YC .-i -3 L u H C-)11 Q O -r+ t+ ca 7.4) Ci cl m O `.--4 '? > r -.i -A O L Q +i > ri 4 'O h :a T ] w U O '' T S+ -ri G cl ci c-1 L� �+. L U :i U .0 E O G r-+ tt _ > a GO C3 1 i 14 ¢ a U , Ci . k 0 = I ^ O C3 44 r' 3Q+ L - J +i -i -i Q r -4 .0 G ii u • 1i O O ri N 3 .t: Ci O -4 1 r'' r- L --, -ri L C;. 1+ F L'. U •r+ -rt it O TiCly. i J L Cx ci �_ CI <Q ^ r > O J J O --i •r1 +i O M :i T E Lt L tR y { CJ1 L! > -ri zi C) U c3 .O -ri ii .1..G N > G--.i 3 0 O u 0 >a � a> a Tei t3+e} -v ,; J .: u -r+ EEzCu > R! 0 -1 u s. - � � u s r a ,I u }� Sp.. G 4 N -^ L•:-+ i to E L 1 C 1 3 G i n to Ct ra c v C , c, i a S- U-* � � .. ' U" � t I^ z 1CJ r 1 j i O { toi C CA >- C G R r to C3 ! to tt5 0 i L t3 ri L = i C; t >+ tD i C ci � Y t✓7 � C y y s 1 �" >✓ o - " mn. } 44 vi 1 N it1 C -O'I �� O t +- O 7 1 t0 t0 t_ N C t.•i Q C �C IAL 4- tD U L -0 1 L O C ' p } O 1 } r- +. ¢+ 1 7} p R C tT + C2.O m i +' � a) O I] !_ 0 0 _.a ce to E O O � =1 4- t0 L E l i- C C O y } O 3 ._ p N Cts N}Qa% to 0 C � Q tD N i C m >p pp v- O m O O R O— E N ID C 7�' + E �+-do to Ln o C CJ i t +' tn v- N at nO o n +" p o O� c rnm C+-}i- iv (x} to C to O L{-- N E W_ 0 1] >..- t}� i R Cl—t U a fl t� LJ E r�� apt �.d�0 E� q tD C R} io L � L O to R � U.Ck- 12 0JCL- 70 "�. (,+ wd Zfl U d U C N C d V R tJ N s d > C m >" > >+L t1►"_... L L S3 "` C. cn O A L p p C m p f-..-i-} C p.- p L tl N L O Q R7 U C O i' } L E�i ! C . toR tJ10 'D !0 >= to C 10-0 C C O ? amm .oC o o > �} F o 04- Ea. CC7� a.a �s L C 1' r-icz t] + � _co .o s- n7EQ a:� 4-2 a r-f 3+ U l s q ri l c tIf U E U 7 '» J 2.t d cq 1 O i Ci 3 1 2-t » 3 C'- i3 ri rl 3 s U C -f rl C .rf . N 0 � r, ,0.S r -ri ,.+ -rf •ri 0.w :. » -7 > •r 1 m a ' If ..aUi w �, +m{ LOJ $ u o o o '�c r-4E C U ,c emi E ^i i fn 72 '7 cs a CS q !+ .-f `. G ^ 3».•r-1. 3 -r3: Q U:E •ri t&.4 C): -7 0 3 o u = G u G i a 'r 1 7 J -ri :2 4 l s r3 r-i -rf -ri k c- -r4 } 3+ > -r•i -^ tJ J .i G cl -d r t" U O .-•t C •.i G J t, p IIS .:` >-4 U -4 34 c" :+ --i U M- uVJ•� O s ! 41aJ m G ti G • u tc M u = O v r a, y L u C q NO• _. C *r.-o OOivji . »J C-i �'v�Cl. U AO U@ A G U U u J is ri C 7 O » .-! •ri 3•+ O Zr ty tll::: C: S+ E O �l U u r: c ! cJ �+r G'a► U 'G" 03 Cr > �: c R tr » { • !G s t` S= � r •Q t } iJ tJ ! v f L 1 - i ci l--4-1 s- = C S N Cl r� 1 G � � N n •iJ 93 N ! i C CS i r R3 CS G r CC � C3 Q rJ �" c0 N: V , to V: O ' to CD i u �r n Sa i j uJ m n C4 C cs ca >- U O !! O C3 to L3_ r�J O -0+�-f •t-a > U r i O .e. m 1+ C• r 1,s2 d c nua a .� c3 .-im :► 3aH O u s 3 8 a Yl d W v m rs > C ;t3-G $4cs +.3 ea w m cS Cl E u $4 -II � J » ^_G - 1+ » -aa U n CR a C U is 4 ca Zi ¢. 34 .0 >` C3 a a z, a'W a r-1 C3 -i m ,4 -O -rf 73 4 A3 0:O O » U to cc 4 u •r1 tJ -rf to ,i •- m t3 t3 a -- o s1 0 2•i U E �, cJr• i rs O G U u 0 L 0 CC U 0 U W t! 42' E -rf 0-w 1+ J �4J 4-D ZJ U : to ss_ 03 G- m. > -.7 O ZS Sa U 0 O » k m r-f. E 1.4 O O 12 N U = - 7 L » -4-l q » .-i W 0--4 ss a >+ = O 0 O .0 r 4 = C7 Cr u :.� n » .0 a --f zi - C. 8 c3 L1. C..:3. CL) a .3 .-ir-f ,r, m >, aoGwo� > aor� >` 0m 1+ 0 r-i w 34 �s :2 U +i U O •.1 t+ si CZ ca G cs .. U -i i 0 i r Qt -4 .! C: U G r-{ 4' 27' m ML`. G ! L ,G CS CS CS Ls -U,.- w 13. vmos, o -At;-4t3a :. .u � mws, C3 J, -1 4) as: oQ C: 3.r C2 ,4 u .3 44 :3 » W +� b M $4 'i3 U rf U '7 0 -rf tri N :3 $4 tw » to t: O w L :+ » :s » A » v-. -ri -0 V -f m 0 CO r4 CS U U ^ r ti i 4-2 O "' L w a'-A » r i r-i .i w O G > w G.s t O L C 7 U U U C3 3+ .-i c G f2. 7 U a O 0- G G U, a 7 m O G O.'. G -3 r-0 = .» n U 0 +i -0 s+ w $+ 3+ » cJ < G O .» O O U2 W K W -ri- 7 -3 U 3 C O V3 E-c CO ECJ :: 'ti O v L3 d :t•r 4 C.:s cu O - i ' rO,3 c r•- ti s; t_: s. _ 1t- l a O --4 -ri -+ _ 4-) J O• 3•r .4 7 �V118 s _ .,.,cyr.;, } T car, 1 cQ G C •zs a U� O D1?',► C a U v a � 34 r1 O W U tIf •."7 O . F ' f W .-i q;-4 S C rY. C 'U _ �s c0 a 41 O +J O ° O i+ C G7 W v ec► I f U U a ao C a. a C O C a r Ia { .; 4J %;.4 S7 � U Oa0UCLa ax :1 34 a '�' -ei r t3+ o y - o ,(a� aaU4 rt O: M CC uMu U w u ,• C C) Q- p. c3 ref m. m a O it r1 rt 4 C) a cc{ Q ; y sa r+ 3 +1 r1 i+ w 0 - to c cs >• $ G a 41 4- 1� 0 'r13+ lsaa.vu13 cc C " i. i) G C:.L4,o+fe°°-na � oC3 a ° e- u sJ > o ° ouco ,-iwCsoli'r°C1 �t w t r s.► O -r1 t U O. sJCJ b c. C f C i - CJ • �� r C C3 f O j } L e L ! � 4 C o f a O u L C v U k 1. rt O --t J G j � f` t_ t 4 tai Q N iJ ri co Y i L iJ ►moi .� 4Z to Q i 40 O _ d fJ Sr y v f• N ru N y _ ., 0 -'% C'.7 x TV d C � C)u U O C!O CJ Jr C ei LS.- r= t+ r=r -0 Ln c: ca 1 J 41 S» 1 +A y : ! C •d O m C m 0 ai a c7 c) O i U C w :► C O C r1 O u %a O L a .1J C C: a w C r1 'O is m U ri &I .-i +! •7-A •• to Gt > rF aC ...1 u a cs m m u a u m O a si u u -'4 w C•.+ E a u ci w G^ C .-4 s. U ri U 14 _ :3 c3 '3 U U C O u V4 ? :: � C s+ ^O-r! T, d m Ci rl m rI u m S4 O L .-i u a a C u O W r- C -i H U4 34 ri •.1 c) C m -a r1 r1 r1 C' la o1 4 L, is ca •O m O Ks 44.4a u �.�..-. rya c3 C fa C > .- = J O U U i+ a o s; 'tJ a tC E-► ¢ C; U iJ iJ F+ GZ O O t^-.1 u $4 CL 44 �J O 44 O O O a Z+ .-1 C u cQ = tr1 !3 .-1 --1 G a u O Q. ,: " W O 10 tJ rf C CL O •• •• a :. C m c U >.u m 7 .= u m m L+ CA w r1 ei) G U a a s Ci a r G •-1 r1 m U Q•) a u c3 m U rt O to u C O E rl .L` a m i+ a O a r1 'C3 a s to C Cl r1 r1 La O Z, 0: C1 L, L, uI, Us► m >,rlcuv m .� -4 •-1 L+ O :..= 34 4G i.U ri .0 a •r1 CC O = rJ O 'a Sj O O a •.4 3 cS " ')f m &A -'4u > U !A � ir.rl O C '-1 .-1 U •d -j Y1.."1 i -N CJ '^ O r: O r-u z< -i C U to r1 U a = C •-1 E r. O m m a a 14 U O i 3 >cI � CarU JCC1 M 7F+ ---,41 iU vU ---V s+ i4 > • 3 0 .� L= c-1 ri } u a al Q l.... '.+•Y t+ jj C }- 1 _£ C C p� .Z2L y O ri 00119 t^. +-► U C: r-i :.► M Q } 43 .z, L f� r•- +1 O -.t t= Q r3 r-F LJ c + } .J &J. G 4.t la • ; RI ! CJ t+ +1 U :7 :/ c .')ri :} C: gQ g i iui W u u v L b O U U U 0 Fi t ri .-F4tA _0 0i ^0 0 «0s QOJS't.Ct+CS " cn W Q + Ja I tq 2S �J -t u 450 +b J > -1 i .i V i 14 Ur .t ?J .Q CS 7 CsO}^ ^l .. .•+: O } C; u y w Q. :J :. 3 O C :. :. ,-i 0 Ci --E t3 E y O W P4 r •*1 y fl-i � t ; . .ri •� .rl O O CJ u'D v 'v O 0 :+ tL` L•I c+ O 'SS CJ U .v1. t3 S :. �4 >i 0 Q U C1 CS O. O CL. 0:: < :4 w ,.a r,� w a u CA ._ C C m w J al t-+ t3 8 .-i O si r11-- ::- Q > :. , u t� > 14 m c:f C) CS Q -4" U $A U J J 'c1 CG !.+ r-s CII O G a)Oj w M p CJ r 4 tI 1: ,.t 4 C! C A- CJI i=- = --- -• ."r» rJ 0 a a w C} O 1 I 1 .Q JJ C: > ca C/ :.. O 14 -a w rf c CJ C: 1 C• ci _ _... _. .. . .. . ..,. . C #C ci a i c3 cl r p CJ I �j t/3 tl 1 } =D 4.3 'o 1--4-4 s_ ; c n l ; N rJ 111 1 C'J r ! O ri' i LZ ori 1 e° >_ i � m '• u rs o 0 o 3.4� ? C-11 tz c r N J ` O a d1 0 _ U 1: is 0% Tn i y"y � Q - . 0 ccs m � 1 a O v C O U tR .0 0 .. v7 of l -rt ,13 .0 O w i i-b 7 m CJ u -". 0 E � s► O tl 14 y C -14 CT 'CJ = w m x -rt y CS y_ Ci O oC N E C CI , 1 +O C s� [ CI 1+ i� 0-13 V 41 U C O C 0 0 4 � m 1 C m C 1 k 0 .4 00 O y 0 ay..c .0 Q ca Q v a u mi� %i .- i 3 rts t +1 tl :3 U. " o u U u O el u $+ -'+ E cl ai C v t a I 3 G w -,i ai SJ �:C a 1+ .= •-t N v4 RS C1 CI 'O +- 1+ O C y ..= t'7. c U m 'U V u Q 3 44 �4 0 O /+ ,c 1+ CI Q c to y � 0 0 • .0 k %A O O 0 -,4 +i O-s, u C Cl) CS M Q w } rn la E m C = m o C U a tel O CL'U -A1+ :3 O i? O e>,' 1+ O t0 �-.Ot u 0 C f0. +ffii arc u..V .14 14v4 . f Q L ra r- 1 . a C r 1+ 41 1N O .-! 0 •rt O 'O to ,O csa CI C 0 4J.r r- }r L 0 14 -rt c 00 N Q. > W JJ (} C la CJ 0 c c .^. 1• . = O tM %i U W > W . . m Q E $4 rt -ri -rt CI 14 14 .-f O Q 14 < ctt O m G O J y U -r+ > y ':1 O a .g r i r ,13 CI IV j m .14 to•-r4 i� lel i O 1+ s.t O c U C •.i ori 0 U a GO 0 'O i Cl L C CL W -r1 O ri to O U k to CS O U .b7 .•L .O 1+ '� 0 -.+ 1+ Z -rt 0 U O s+ a i ^ -rt zt w r- CS E .: + O x c0 C i G r > t GS c 1 r O . 0012 _..__ ll c x, n ti 1 C; O E C 3 • >~ G- L "4 C r.•i 4! f c. t1 > cl N •CS 3 c03m a +4 a 93 U O C C +i ri > t'1 L c, i.+ ••- () cc SG N to c1 •� � -ri U +i fl rl 0C C O U iJ d m C ri U tt G w r•i .-i"a N 3- O 1+ U W U to U Zi C C, C3 C cr tl i v fl. E-+ t+w O O b M aC C > 0 X 0 a 0 C 0 •� v t:. 2 -ri O -ri 5 w }r U H ^ 7 C3 tJ U 0 ''. "� .'�. •• °0 CL V- i. i.+ 'a U u t7 O W La :� G $- -a C•r'i •ri 41 H b C o ` C •O r-+ a ca C 0 p O 0 a � G S.rJ.s.► -.i qui tl u y C 0 a u 8 U i► z.o +-' L •C+i > U w':s N tl -ri -ri 0 G O -ri 7t C z > a y vi O -ri a C ::. � � tl t+ i.►..f. tl :s U -rc <. R. ti N -rl t+ t.1 a c9 0 C to C J ca L� 0 1.+ .0 0 U tl C3 ' f, Q w -.i r. rC ¢t-0 �,` .-1 •ri is a a 0. �S •r� E tt] ci CD r• t �^. t:. �. 1+ U r{ !L k t i+ . i b7 0 U G. S+: i► is CJ a • ¢i O 0 E w U ai 1-1 0 0 a '.'S - •ri C O rn O rt a3 E t:.E JM y y V .: +-+ E •:t 0 w 0 rflcz go Ci es > E cis Q 'EG i C '-1 C tL O i+ VI i t ci 4-3_ o r. it s' S- U U en �± N a +' CAM tn L> 0� c sem.. I Y 'a a a to go 7 +c CCI L y ca i i=3 t= ! to r L+ p 0 to > i 3 ttl. a O Cw _ ri ti. O N� i o.� Qj yp. • C) 3 � i E i i ri ca iJ cj _ej 1 eo iJ 1 S- G 1 i + ci 4j•� , .t3 w c a IAV - s- CCJJ �" ci >- jo O L? •r E A C sr C) u a+ -.4 cd .C'�- O CX U C nj 1 - __ h.. �• O ' .0-% a a .T 1 �,' r' c -° n s u u al- Cad u s. .. C•� o. cx Lr os- o a riu 41 m,as s •- is a ct o a Q e es rs '� a u° ams . ► cr a e,us co .. .,:c . N p o; ea a tea. tJ��.w a v c� A ;�.v c c v M C z C :,.} ttl W C: a C: y 3 u d uj G ;4: O ! +� , ori Ci •ri O 44" L _ Cfrta Ct'4 'a CI �-' a . d..d:::aj C r P 41 ca N t: -A U is Sa O. G- d L &7 •Lf f!0 L O L. -- •-i G rte^. AJ ca 41 CS -a UA CC S4 •.t d o eju 4 er v s+ O o u C O st+ O GCS 3 L u � O U rt 73 40 .p em L . a ! ci ! C3 ,-1 y t� 4 i p Y CA 4-1 3k. G � i C— co n { G `! N k. 41 t 4J 0-r V i �' x to j S d Cr k' 34 G r!. .Cl A w CC'S a t:. C: j>' C O X -4-0 an kx 44 • ca Y .. 0 t_t Q7 � S- ci • N G O f ei s- a E c 0- co wOv iL t-s -- ,Q E ,i .fi Ov L �.06 x,� JJ _ .3 •.t sJ CS W -r4 c2 w .0 U O m M. t +, .► 4-3 = }a.zx G .0 4J •r4 O U > b t:1 O Sa O i► .-{ £ w a -rt 0 'L7 f! Q O 41 ' C2 = 4.; 'a O } 0 0 ♦ 4 U U ? S,a :J 4 -r4 O 4 tc ;s U 1 C + �- t.i .d U 11 Q W ra .^. G! o fl r- O U r-1-r4 a O U-i 'r4 0 Ji sz > esc ^ sJ .iwcn :la O -- o r- U .-f .1aua acro sJ � o :s a •-4 a ,rr .4 .-1 a u ,{ 4 4- f► C O u >+ u f j zi ^J G!,.4 ^.. C '3 C.r'�. '►^ J +J OPl. , :4 O --f U r.: C ,a G s.t *•. C tC 7! sJ u *3 V w tI �' '-i f: O 4- L O'. O i i ?. U t+ :+ U 1r O- U '►4 �-; ^3 f+ O N •ri t� J .-4 -4 44 J $4 > C «1 �3 C3 -,t :► .-i O I 77 3+ 4+ A♦:+ •*f -� D -4--%%U U !J ca i tA O c:+ U L N U LN :J s; O 0 W 'r Q U U U <x O;.O In 34 �- ! u zi U4 -4 IS t V4 G C.•a S %4 -1 �h Pi 3 iJ r-i U Q Cl. " Q tJ ♦f., u G G a. U U of 0 t: -t LJ 0 *-t 14 $4 -V Ci JT O -'t 9 ^.3 s 1 it r .= L O = .-♦ ? O n.-4 u •rt Q CJ y Of CJ C Z3 U ^ O -ri � J N JJ t* R.JJ u x L c") G. 47 W c.^i F E ,-{.f+ UT to cira , 'O C +3 < C i tn = z O 1 L3 1--4-i i i G in i n Q ccn +♦ � . +J i ra to •i s c3 t� G sr t CS.J „�.• � G S- ci eJ Sa d, O O tJ i ' to 1 c: cl i ;S cm ri +0 t1 ! 1 O •4'1 O > cc to G wR D. Cw O �4J OU O C zto it f-+ C L G 11 1a�-- G c: i ~ cj 4.3 i; ! to �,4.3 ! S.. ci E O .0 4z c _ a i G tz ?- G+-♦ Li In. Lx! W t3 t3 1 O IFO s: L' •N G y t*4 �. 0©123, , a v • �+} s+a -i'Ji Lai t. O+= iC . > 0 a -f ' �• _ , 14 -A a u� a rt i4 z .4 V w -1-4 m sa Q Ct 43 '•w ti r> +i ti,:tr. 0 i► to sa rS a + E Ct S a ••# Q i'a: Cs 4J. t . ! "�*-• -►i .i C 'Y -r i ti fi •"v ri L ' A V A. C.". i 4- L U O vl G. rf. .". k] 1. C :i Ca •`�•�W t tla vi >rcae r m 1 s �. t3 I ra u--i ..� ..i a .-i e� > -.i O > v.x .O.. .. 101 C3 f3 �: C s+ 4 4 ..{ -i i,a -d CJ -r i J .^� 4a"'i t.is S"• w .. ;.a U m e,s a,-.i to C: Z is r3 ZI :1 a +i O a +� saa E" t! O I �t > x+ O v +.e. r.. a -a . C S" a: a«tW 7.1s G. C3 :r1 Lr :!1 J i a to"ca 0 0.44 a i-. y, t 9 s t *z' r.« •d1. U C: TI'.eJ it °'.. ri w .# ^.! a IJ it yi. .., a i..ti f t..' .�--1 'O•' •:r'- s^• U4 ji.U, t7 is; a v 44, :J O W?"4 k :3•-i'K. U sa W'.-i rte'6t w' a --4 "a co is -• .cr �` .^.�L3"'.":tS -ri K'.. :+ .-' -4""LJ as V 4 La..',^�•. ,Cal . �^ G i AO ca CLi . c . 45 v4; TJ i 01- 4V.«i tom- iv UA %4! E-4 U4 • m a W :IrI .!i to -04 L Aj 1.4 41 -^'- Y'i as �"# M CJ'� O �„ .. • '� '" +�'"• ,� to u a tl ti tr J >La 3 CS u n rt +` L+ *:i .y y:{ d , CLE 7 cl ec > ca m > a. > as u > a +-# i-+ 4A -r± '3 'D $a -4 U 'Q ts- +ri c cis at i+ Q1 -.i J u J O u O is:►s. .1. 4341 w.•« cr. O i- ri tr Ca ;i •ric a a t+ > se-r+ 3.s ill 3i -r .i i. Cr - i a «r1 ri '& VC» .a R1 SS v1rz ':: to -- O ti.ti-I U $ u O 01- a "a O V-4 a O a1 w .•i a a sa a .. V C H # a.s a Witt rJ ? 0 � '.v G t3 C it pt �'•i c 3�s !aa taa _ am Rf C -F4 ri -a . ' to o '".� a O +rt .7 3- �► :� .-: •-#.=; ,«, c 03 va x',sY c! is Ca U s- t1 A C a a a a O $4 0 a 0-0.. 0 a-► a O >+ L to a .-t a C� G .,i +.i.+rt ,rti a u; U si to � V t1s w m _ 31A > v Y+ 0 41 14 a O ,0•S 41'SLSC�1 iia 3F1 $a ie: Cas :s Zo cl as C:. i•i cz E: ++ >+ O �- r-i is •-• S s O qt r-# C: -rt 0. a C >sO tii" CIL a O + r O +•i.^.. J.rC ta. aa. E is +i -.i tlG •-i = tJ CC u C"t; s:: F3 ca tla t C +a •-i -ri .G f. rl C1 Ca x U -ri a -r- 'r a +•tri_.-i.ems: .0 li s^i 41 { 4- a H L Ci U sa C: '.»«-u ai O CC-C th .L. ri > J 0 -ri ti ^' is '• A a.s -ti V G p ? C 3 £ 7 '"t.. t»rt �.? >. tri 0 Esi «"# V r C .a ra L ea .r1 g < +* +! 0m s~ O tr+ 0.00 to 44 � ^. • i3 .v...� a a t.« a .0 si. s a .^. }►..a k-M -Pt V U... rJ•�^� # 97 a �� p C! .0 as ea E �L --s u O 0 i.a •1 ti -7 > G ^ - .^.t 0. iJ .a.C« .a a { r1 ea 4 0 *z m a zw M. a,: r-t -a Qi E cf a .-+ > > > O Qi & •-t O @a .O :-. a c' a-j a M to C A acs,.="..E"at sa .. sa a.L:t S e3 sa,44 r-; a a •Fs•.- - .- meg' .s 4 i E +t n sJ .a a. U x to « 0. U .C. o 0 �? " W Q 'i E! is ^. L'a Ct .^...4 0 .0 � 'h V '1t +... Ls a a _ O s1.�-. s. --r s. .•f c u -.+ it cc ai o� L .-i «t E " +t.� ;a zw es as O La -4 tY :. . 0 s- a. LM L. O -C w• .i; 0 > ca > Ci C :1 in a a1.to g Ca a a >. tr. •:+ 0 t» 4A = ,, C, Q r- 00 C i-- ii _ r>~ 4V*1—, &J 00 2 GC O O V :a +i" C tl �t.. }+.�.r i f 4-0 �+ S+ ^ tl CI ?+.r1 J aJ i r- , .n a �, -rt .� .� u > v ,� E u u ;.► u ss c3 ?3 a O u.: C �. 4 b Qj y C! ar a tJ G.-1 C) r! G -A l.3 a 0 u u G- 3s �,' a 0 v -i .^. J V C3 o a 44 C3 O k :0 a3 a rt O O 410' r-! 'CT s7 `U E '*J v a u r3;m' tl R. i u u u tl f+ W cc a ? t f O C. O V a s [S IM.. • G i < G r m O u o 'o E "-4 E cS 0 o Si O E ct a .-1 u C u Qi ! > G u to to - 0 o m r� O m ur. °i in a "�c'�f a -44 A O i�.t-+ 41 a. E£,- w a mO "4 0 a C3 OWOu u <u r .t'. C1 u C3CV to u to tl tl O s+ --i w s. O m < 3+ •i 0 .14 CJ M GC O Z3 u � 7 CJ r3 ^ -- CJ ii.,r+ C w G S*-f C ^.r J u 7 u $+ L+ -rt u CS u tx r3' 4- W .-t VO� 34m c ' : R+ -f > � 0- 0..u a u -1 y u tl CJ tl $4 CJ W U • "13J G, q O d U y %a b u 0 a1 o r- ^O 'C E t+_0.'Cs A+-+ 0 Q Ct a j-►,--i ��_._ tt3 ! Q & C ; a Q ci tn :J JJ 3 ! } . 'C3 ` CQ I tR O i G n cn C11 cl 5 ev O I L U � O .LL- to s ^ i cc ar C S- eD do C go V x tJ O @. 3 4J t co Mwl s O fn �� O tl O O y L cc a { G x„ m � 4-2 � 4j T _ 41 Ncn e3 E 1 S- rJ E 4Jgn � O cV �3 2 -- = f u.j I Ofri -��- I J- O E !O+ C y 441 co u -d G " E t+ - `er rm x v - x ^ or lip 4-bu as •.{ !7b • t'1 t r- 1 J '• ' O O -4 �4 C � -d - 1 SJ Cl !,c , r-•I X11 qua =: caro .. = o :_s E ci C V- r- G N •� cl S .-t „4 O 4 fr O O O .! > w rat c CJ i lc:z C4 u. :7 .i N C 41 to34 CJ h O ! N cz ci j .., •u -q! • In I G i ti \! t V O 1 C s z m cl 41 tz ca to R1 to G � � N ' v •C ,r co :.d c I Q a itA co M O o 4 w •c t7 > p W ON $4 0 >= i. L wm ttia . fi tJ CA I �w IC N iii• 010 S+ t� cEi s ) a•-, ' t +1 L C eb t 41 y�4J 41 C iCEE C) ' 1 L N f • G J M C2. C ia! 1 L j Lt_ L` I:1 t 3► f w_ � go tz 1+ +� u � 1`x.1 ca +� E O t L �j a ,.. c N 46 > O O Li a F+- O V A O a O O K O C +-3 to M rr O '= m 9. O rt C A O > R R rr rr r. rr A r! rr L� V a _ cl R r m K w o '� 3' :. > i C G K Y N K N K R Y O O CJ O O OrT rr rr _3 a rr O i� rr p O ft n G O ~ 1A. rr cr O K O Y O K O a .••3 C) K R O O r Y n a r� - ►- 0 N to o a . C1 C\ V R N W N co N lJ1 l� G• O H Co O O W O a, to Ln -j it a o 0 0 a 0 o E H C o. -o 0 o O o O o 0 o N H a lo- Y a a o a 0 a CD o93 K �C rt CA Y d a �s a C Y W N N O 1-1- O Y !J V r! N W N W '� Vf tV C A b v C% y�, NJ O v O O O v Aa C-. .. n a o_ o C a o a C) a w o Y O C` O ` O C O O O 7. Stf µ O •.�. VT A � w✓ > p O A -C* W x y {A irf O O O O O K S ^ tt R W N N R r't t-r Z�z'' a a .� 7 p �n.. o o b b a s Cl a o o a Y r o o 0 o r Y Y K Q A A r a' 1-+ Y O O O O O Y �T O O O O O O O W W %3 R r! R rr rr r. - r7- K Ln o a a a a a a a n . 0 0 0 0 10 10 V 10 -a ^o -tf a o 0 0 o Y Y F i 1— Y Y r rn v n r cr o n n n m f In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19 75 In the Matter of Agreement with the Contra Costa County Development Association. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an agreement with the Contra Costa County Development Association for services in promoting economic development and tourism, and assisting with development and implementation of bicentennial activities, during the period from September 1, 1975 through August 31, 1976 under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said agreement. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Contra Costa County Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Development Association Supervisors County Auditor-Controller affixed this 2nd day of September . 1975 County Administrator J. R. OLSSON., Clerk By. Deputy Clerk H 24 12n4 . 15-M N. In aham r AGREEMENT FOR PRO140TING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TOURISM AND SUPPORT OF BICENTENNIAL PROGRAM'BY THIS AGREEMENT OF September 2. 1975 the ,COUNTY s " OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the. State of. : California, hereinafter referred to as the County, and the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, a non-profit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as the Development Association, pursuant to Government Code Section 26100, the parties MUTUALLY AGREE: 1. Purpose. The County Board of Supervisors is authorized to expend funds for economic development and publicizing the resources of the County including the agricultural, horticultural, viticultural, mineral, industrial, commercial, climatic, educational, recreational, artistic, musical, cultural, and other resources or advantages of the County to increase the trade and commerce of the County; 2. The Development Association is a non-profit California corporation organized for the purpose, among others, of advertis- ing, exploiting, and making known the resources of the County; 3. Services. From September 1, 1975 and including August 31, 1976, the Development Association will continue to perform the following services for the County pursuant to the authority and purposes set forth in paragraph 1: a. Assist County to accumulate data and provide information to citizens helping to attract and encourage prospective , residents and business firms to locate in the County. b. Prepare a comprehensive study and survey of the County resources relating to agriculture, industry, trade and commerce. V() r 2. c. Assist in the promotion of tourism and in the attraction of conventions and recreational, artistic, musical and cultural events to the County. d. Publicize the County resources, advantages and opportunities for capital investment in Contra Costa County. e. Provide and publish economic data on the County resources, and make such data available to prospective visitors, residents and business firms. f. Encourage trade and commerce in the County, and cooperate, assist and advise other organizations and public bodies to accomplish this purpose. g. Provide a representative exhibit for Contra Costa County at the California State Fair and Exposition, Contra Costa County Fair, and in the State Capitol Building, to further promote these purposes. h. Assist the .American Revolution Bicentennial Committee of- Contra Costa County with development and implementa- tion of bicentennial activities. 4. Compensation. County will pay Development Association for services 3(a) through 3(g) above the sum of One Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($140,000) in monthly payments, after receiving billings from the Association. In addition, the County will pay 00130 3. $15,000 to support the County Bicentennial Program as described in paragraph 3 (h) . The Bicentennial funds shall be segregated from other funds with a separate accounting of their use •provided to the County. The Association shall provide the County- with quarterly operating statements reporting all receipts and* expenditures of funds. The County may examine the books and records of the Association at any time concerning the matters covered by this agreement. S. Term. The agreement expires on and after August 31, 1976. 6. Termination. County may at any time immediately terminate this contract if, in its sole judgment, the Develop- ment Association is not satisfactorily performing, and may without cause terminate it on 30 days prior written notice to the Development Association, and the Association waives all payments after either such termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties by their officers thereunto duly authorized, have executed this agreement. COUNTY.,,PF CONT OSTA, a CONTRA COSTA COUNTY poli ' "al s i.vision o e DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION, Sta e o rnia a corp ation W. N. ess By Chairman of the President Supervisors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (Seal) of the County of Contra Costa, State of California By tDeputy r•. rvcr.�R=tai APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel BY Deputy Victor J. Westman 00131 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 R119 75 In the Matter of Lease with Duffel Financial & Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a month-to-month rental agreement, commencing July 1, 1975, with Duffel Financial & Construction .Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners for premises at Suite 120, B";i Al 2401 Stanwell Drive, Concord, California for occupancy by the Human Resources Agency, Social Service Department. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid cc: Public Works Department yytm my hand and the Sod of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor, c% Real affixed " 2nd dav of September 19 75 Property Buildings & Grounds J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Director, Human Resources . Deputy Clerk Agency Maxine M. .Neuf ld County Auditor-Controller County Administrator 0 132 H 24 a7s 10M RENTAL AGREEMENT 2401 Stanwell Drive - Suite 120 Concord, California Social Service Department 1. PARTIES: Effective on SEP 2 1975 1975, DUFFEL FINANCIAL & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND BUCHANAN OAKS PARTNERS, hereinafter called "LESSOR` and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California, herein- after called "COUNTY", mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. LEASE OF PREMISES: LESSOR, in consideration of the rents, covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, hereby leases to COUNTY and COUNTY hereby hires from LESSOR, Suite 120, containing approximately 1620 square feet, located on the ground floor of Building A, 2401 Stanwell Drive, Concord. COUNTY shall have the right of non-exclusive use of parking facilities located north of the Buchanan Oaks No. 1 office complex. 3. TERM: The term of this Agreement is month to month commencing July 1 , 1975. 4. RENTAL: COUNTY shall pay to LESSOR as rent and use of said premises, a monthly rental of Seven Hundred Thirty and No/100 ($730.00) payable on the 10th day of each month during the term of this monthly Rental Agreement. Payments are to be sent to LESSOR at 3730 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Lafayette, CA 94549. 5. USE OF PREMISES: The premises shall be used during the term hereof for the operation of a County office. 6. UTILITY SYSTEMS: LESSOR shall furnish and maintain any and all electric, water, plumbing, heating and ventilating systems in good working order., 7. UTILITIES AND JANITORIAL SERVICES: COUNTY shall pay for all utilities and shall provide its own janitorial services. 8. HOLD HARMLESS: It is understood and agreed that the LESSOR shall not in way be responsible for damages to persons or property in and upon said premises while said persons are on COUNTY business and shall not be held liable for any - l - Microfilmed with board order 00133 .... : liability, claim or suit for damages to the person or property of anyone whomsoever while in or upon said leased premises during said term in conjunction with the performance of COUNTY business; and COUNTY hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless LESSOR from any liability or charges of any kind or character by reason of such injury or damage claim or suit for liability arising therefrom in, around or upon said leased premises, except in the case of any structural, '► mechanical or failure of equipment or building owned by LESSOR, which results in damage to any person or property, LESSOR will be held liable. LESSOR agrees to hold COUNTY completely harmless from damages to persons or property and COUNTY shall not be held liable for any liability, claim or suit for damages to the persons or property when and if said persons or property are invited or brought into the demised premises by LESSOR. 9. SURRENDER OF PREMISES: On the last day of the said term, COUNTY will peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to LESSOR these premises with their appurtenances and fixtures in good order, condition and repair, reasonable use and wear thereof and damage by earthquake, fire, public calamity, by the elements, by Act of God or by circumstances over which COUNTY has no control excepted. 10. INSPECTION: LESSOR may enter the premises between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday and may employ proper representatives to see that the property is being properly cared for and that no waste is being made and that all things are being done best calculated to preserve the property, and in full compliance with the terms and conditions hereof. - 2 - 00134 11. TIME IS THE ESSENCE of this lease. LESSEE• LESSOR COUNJ4 OF CON TA LNCrAE & CONSTRUCTMN 'CO, JL gou /""0Y B OAKS-PARTNERS ATTEST: JAMES R. OLSSON, Clerk D uty RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL County Administrator y�. Deputy Public Works Uiftctor Buildings and Grounds By Real Property AgentZ APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN B. CLAUSEN, County Counsel By Kt) Deputy County Co nsel WAP:dl b - 3 - 00135. , In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 ,19 75 In the Matter of Contract No. 22-026 with the Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools for provision of a Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources Agency, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a contract for the period July 15, 1975, through June 30, 1976, with the Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools for provision of i Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program under the Short-Doyle Act with a total payment limit of $56,207 and under terms and conditions as more particularly set forth in said contract (No. 22-026). PASSED by the Board September 2, 1975 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board.of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September _ 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. Deputy Clerk Orig: Hilman Resources Agency N. In ailam Attn: Contracts Adm. cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller Acting Health Officer Contractor H 24 8 7S 10M 001100 00136 H 24 8/75 lora W ➢}z'P 'Contra Costa County Standard Form STANDARD CONTRACT (Purchase of Services) 1. Contract Identification. Number 22 - 026 Department: Health (AIRS) Subject: Administration and staff services to provide a Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program (operated by the Center for Human Development) 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Capacity: Public Agency Address: 75 Santa Barbara Road, Pleasant Hill, California 94523 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is July 15, 1975, and it terminates June 30. 1976, unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Pa ent Limit. County's total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed 56,207 5. County's Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. Contractor's Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference: Contra Costa County Mental Health Services (Short-Doyle) Annual Plan 1975-76 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: California Administrative Code, Title 9, Subchapter 3. (Community Mental Health Services under the Short-Doyle Act); Welfare and Institutions Code, Division 5, Part 2. (The Short-Doyle Act). 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto: CO Y OF CO COSTA CA SIA CONTRACTOR �Gf ay Chairman, Boarvp pervisors Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk Designate official capaci n business • and affix corporation seal) gy_kJ7e1=_ta State of California ) ss. N MC.'R M Deputy County of Contra Costa ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (CC 1190.1) Recommended by Department The person signing above for Contractor known to me in those individual and f business capacities, personally appeared By e L V �;, ��,�,c,,,�t 13-► j�[�,�,�T'�jL before me today and acknowledged that he/ Designee they signed it and that the corporation ► or partnership named above executed- the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws Form Approved: County Counsel or a resolution of its board of directors. Dated: 0 OZ 7 / By �6Zl�t,dl�� Q•t v..�C.c ra�-iV J Deputy /Deputy County Clerk (A-4617 REV 5/75) Ile /Deputy County Clerk (A-4617 REV 5/7S) Y - ' Contra Costa County Standard Form PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) ij (� cc Number �+ V V 1. Payment Basis. County shall in no event pay to the Contractor a sum in excess of the total amount specified in the Payment Limit of this Contract. Subject to the Payment Limit, it is the intent of the parties hereto that the total payment to Contractor for all services provided for County under this Contract shall be only for costs that are allowable costs (see Paragraph 3. below) and are actually incurred in the performance of Contractor's obligations under this Contract. 2. Payment Amounts. Subject to later adjustments in total payments in accordance with the below provisions for Cost Report and Settlement, Audits, and Audit Exceptions, and subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract, County will- pay illpay Contractor: [Check one alternative only.] X] a. $ 4,887 monthly, cr [ ] b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or [ ] c. An amount equal to Contractor's allowable costs that are actually incurred each month, but subject to the "Budget of Estimated Program Expenditures" included in the Service Plan. 3. Allowable Costs. Contractor's allowable costs are only those which are determined in accordance with: [Check one alternative only.] [ ] a. General Services Administration Federal Management Circular FMC-74-4, Attachment A (Principles For Determining Costs Applicable To Grants and Contracts With State and Local Governments) and Attachment B (Standards For Selected Items of Cost), and, subject to said Attachments A and B, such other documents (if any) specified in the Service Plan regarding: (1) Principles for determining and allocating the allowable costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, and (2) Standards for determining the allowability of selected items of costs of providing those services set forth in the Service Plan, or LX] b. Such State regulations and documents as are set forth in the Service Plan regarding accounting guidelines, including standards for determining allowable or non-allowable costs. 4. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands monthly for payment in accordance with Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Said demands shall be made on County Demand Form D-15 and in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment for services rendered no later than 90 days from the end of the month in which said services are actually rendered. Upon approval of said payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee, County will make monthly payments as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00138 (A-4618 REV 6/75) -1- (A-4618 REV 6/75) Contra Costa County. Standard Fora PAYMENT PROVISIONS (Cost Basis Contracts) Number 22 " 026 5. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to the Contractor when, in the opinion of the County expressed in writing to the Contractor, (a) the Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) the Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 6. Cost Raport and Settlement. No later than sixty (60) days following the termination of this Contract, Contractor shall submit to County a cost report in the form required by County, showing the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract. If said cost report shows that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, County will remit any such excess amount to Contractor, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. If said cost report shows that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, Contractor shall remit any such excess amount to County. 7. Audits. The records of the Contractor may be audited by the County, State, or United States government, in addition to any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan. Any certified cost report or audit required by the Service Plan shall be submitted to County by Contractor within such period of time as may be expressed' by applicable State or Federal regulations, policies or contracts, but in no event later than 18 months from the termination date of this Contract. If such audit(s) show that the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above exceed the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract, including any adjustments made pursuant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then Contractor agrees to pay to County within 30 days of demand by County any such excess amount. If such audit(s) show that the allowable costs that have actually been incurred by Contractor under this Contract exceed the payments made by County pursuant to Paragraph 2. (Payment Amounts) above, including any adjustments made pur- suant to Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) above, then County agrees to pay to Contractor any such excess amount, but subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract. 8. Audit Exceptions. In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7. (Audits) above, Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate County, State or Federal audit agencies occurring as a result of its performance of this Contract. Contractor also agrees to pay to the County within 30 days of demand by County the full amount of the County's liability, if any, to the State and/or Federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to the Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Initials: IV Contractor County Dept. J otl ,n s�(] (A-4618 REV 6/75) -2- Contra Costa County Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Number 22 = 026 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor shall be subject to and comply with all Federal, State and local laws and regulations applicable with respect to its performance hereunder, including but not limited to, licensing, employment and purchasing practices; and wages, hours and conditions of employment. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor shall keep and make available for inspection by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records pertaining to this Contract and such additional records as may be required by the County. 4. Retention of Records. The Contractor and County agree to retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for three years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report (whichever is later) under this Contract, and until all Federal/State audits are complete and exceptions resolved for the funding period covered by this Contract or for such further period as may be required by law. Upon request, Contractor shall make available these records to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 5. Termination. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, at their sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other. b. Failure to Perform. The County, upon written notice to Contractor, may terminate this Contract should the Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, the County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to the County of completing Contractor's performance shall be deducted from any sum due the Contractor under this Contract. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding Paragraph 5.a. above, in the event that Federal, State, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be developed and set forth in a written Informal Agreement entered between the Contractor and the County. Such Informal Agreements when entered shall not be amendments to this Contract except to the extent that they further detail or clarify that which is already required here- under. Further, any Informal Agreement entered may not enlarge in any manner the scope of, this Contract, including any sums of money to be paid the Contractor as provided herein. Informal Agreements may be approved for and executed on behalf of the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. This Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by the Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval. b. Administrative Amendments. Subject to the Payment Limit, only the Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by the Contractor and the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required State or Federal (United States) approval, provided that such administrative amendments may not materially change the Payment Provisions or the Service Plan. 001 Initials: Contractor County Dept. Contra Costa County Standard form GENERAL CO24DITIONS (Purchase of Services) Number - 026 9. Disputes. Disagreements between the County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final determination in writing by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made or his designee or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the State or Federal Government. 10. Law Governing Contract. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations. Should Federal or State regulations touching upon this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract is subject to amendment to assure conformance with such Federal or State requirements. 12, No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the County indicating the Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any, part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the County be thereby estopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions hereof. 13. Original Contract. The original copy of this Contract and of any, modification or amendment thereto is that copy filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. 14. Subcontract and Assignment. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this Contract without first obtaining written approval from the County. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not assign this Contract, or monies due or to become due hereunder, without the prior written consent of the County. 15. Independent Contractor Status. This Contract is by and between two independent contractors and is not intended to and shall not be construed to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association. 16. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor agrees to furnish to the County upon demand a valid copy of the most recently adopted bylaws of any Corporation and also a complete and accurate list of the governing body (Board of Directors or Trustees) and to timely update said bylaws or the list of its governing body as changes in such governance occur, if Contractor is a corporation. Contractor promises and attests that the Contractor and any members of its governing body shall avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest. 17. Confidentiality. Contractor agrees to comply and to require his employees to comply with all applicable State or Federal statutes or regulations respecting confiden- tiality, including but not limited to, the identity of recipients, their records, or services provided them, and assures that: a. All applications and records concerning any individual made or kept by Contractor or any public officer or agency in connection with the administration of or relating to services provided under this Contract will be confidential, and will not be open to examination for any purpose not directly connected with the administration of such service. b. No person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00141 (A-4616 REV 5/75) -2- luz�s .z � `rConi;a'4 for County Dept. I 00141 (A-4616 REV 5/75) -2- Contra Costa County _ Standard Form GENERAL CONDITIONS (Purchase of Services) Number 22 - 026 18. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract shall be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, sex, race, religion, color, national origin, or ethnic background, and that none shall be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship or instruction. 19. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, save harmless and indemnify the County and its officers, agents and employees from all liabilities and claims for damages for death, sickness or injury to persons or property, including without limitation, all consequential damages, from any cause whatsoever arising from or connected with the operations or the services of the Contractor hereunder, whether or not resulting from the negligence of the Contractor, its agents or employees. 20. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the Contractor shall keep in effect liability insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Liability Insurance. The Contractor shall provide a policy or policies of liability insurance naming the County and its officers and employees as additional insureds, including coverage for owned and non-owned automobiles, with the following minimum limits: (1) $250,000 for each person and $500,000 for each accident or occurrence for all damages arising out of death, bodily injury, sickness or disease from any one accident or occurrence, and (2) $100,000 for all damages arising out of injury to or destruction of property for each accident or occurrence. b. Workmen's Compensation. The Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate of Workmen's Compensation insurance evidencing coverage for its employees. c. Additional Provisions. Not later than the effective date of this Contract, the Contractor shall provide the County with a certificate(s) of insurance evidencing the above liability insurance. The policies must include a provision for thirty (30) days written notice to County before cancellation or material change of the above- specified coverage. Said policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the County, the State and Federal governments, their officers, agents and employees, so that any other insurance policies held by them shall not contribute to any loss covered under the Contractor's insurance policies. 21. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract shall be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to the County shall be addressed to the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, c/o Contracts Administration Unit, Ninth Floor, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California 94553. Notices to the Contractor shall be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice shall be the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery. 22. Primacy of General Conditions. Except for Special Conditions which expressly supersede General Conditions, the Special Conditions (if any) and Service Plan do not limit any term of the General Conditions. Initials: Contractor County Dept. 00142 (A-4616 REV 5/75) -3- SERVICE PLAN dumber 22 ,- 026 1. Service. Under this Contract, the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS (hereinafter referred to as Contractor) shall provide for County certain administration and staff services to establish and operate a Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program in Contra Costa County directed at the schools and general community. Contractor's Center for Human Development shall operate said comprehensive program, consisting of the following three service components: a. Alcohol Education Services. Under this service component, Contractor shall: (1) Assist County's Alcoholism Information and Rehabilitation Services (AIRS) staff to plan, implement, and coordinate a comprehensive prevention .. program of alcohol education in the schools (elementary, intermediate, secondary, and junior colleges) and communities of Contra Costa County; said assistance shall include participation in a planning workshop conducted by AIRS and regular monthly consultation, as required by AIRS. (2) Provide information, education, and consultation on problems of alcoholism and alcohol abuse to the staff of school districts, county agencies, and allied service programs, and in response to requests from the general community. (3) Assist AIRS staff in conducting a comprehensive alcohol education and alcohol abuse curriculum unit (lasting 3 class sessions, where possible) in approximately 75 schools (and serving approximately 40,000 school children and students) in Contra Costa County. (4) Hire and employ two (2) full-time Alcohol Education Specialists who shall: (a) Respond to requests from schools and the general public for alcohol information and education programs, including those being conducted by AIRS. (b) Assist school administrators in the examination_ of existing alcohol education activities in the schools with the goal of improving alcohol education curricula, including an emphasis on prevention and early identification in the classroom. (c) Organize and conduct workshops for school teachers, allied county staff, and community organizations. (d) Implement training activities suggested by the California State Board of Education Guidelines for Drug/Alcohol Education. (e) Assist AIRS in the development and maintenance of County's resource information center on alcohol abuse and training materials. b. Alcohol Education Training Services. Under this service component, Contractor shall: (1) Plan, implement, and coordinate (with regular consultation from AIRS) a comprehensive training program in alcohol and drug education in the schools and communities of Contra Costa County. (2) Provide training and technical assistance primarily to the staff of County's Health Department and direct service providers (e.g., recovery home and deto.:i.fication facility staff), but also on a limited basis to the staff of schools and indirect-service providers (e.g., Social Service, Probation, Law Enforcement, and Mental Health), including training workshops for persons who are directly involved in the treatment of alcoholism, covering the areas of communication skills, alcohol information, the community model concept, counseling skills, and causal factors. Initials: 1�4 Contractor County Dept. 00243 I I 1 SERVICE PLAN Number 22 - 026 (3) Hire and employ one (1) Alcohol Education Training Consultant who shall: ' (a) Evaluate and respond to requests from schools and the general public for alcohol training programs. (b) Assist school administrators in the examination of existing alcohol education activities in the schools with the goal of improving alcohol education curricula. (c) Organize and conduct at least 20 training workshops primarily for County staff working with alcoholics and for employees of other programs currently funded as part of the County's alcoholism program, members of the County Alcoholism Advisory Board, and members of community alcoholism councils, but also on a limited basis for school teachers and community organizations; each work- shop shall last an average of 3 days and range from 3 to 8 hours per day. These workshops should cover, but not be limited to, the following topics: (i) Basic core knowledge about and personal attitudes toward alcohol, alcoholic behavior, alcoholism, and addictions and dependency in general; (ii) Basic knowledge of public policy with regard to alcohol and alcoholism, including general implications of existing Federal, State, and County legislation and regulations; and (iii) Self-awareness, development of effective therapeutic relation- ships, and knowledge of referral, and particularly treatment, resources. (d) Implement training activities suggested by the California State Board of Education Guidelines for Drug/Alcohol Education. (e) Serve as liaison between the Center for Human Development and the Contra Costa County Alcohol Advisory Board. c. Alcohol Abuse Survey Contractor and AIRS shall jointly explore the feasibilit; of a survey of alcohol abuse among school students in Contra Costa County in cooperation with the County's Alcohol Program Evaluation Unit. 2. Program and Administrative Requirements. In operating its Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program under this Contract, Contractor shall comply with applicable State requirements, standards, and regulations, including, but not limited to, the Californi Administrative Code, Title 9, Subchapter 3. (Community Mental Health Services Under the Short-Doyle Act), Section 523. (Contracts for Service), Section 545. (Consultation, Educatic and Information Services), Section 549. (Training), Section 640 (Financial Records), Article 14. (Purposes, Processes, and Requirements of Consultation, Education and Informati- Services), and Article 18. (Requirements for Training Services). Furthermore, Contractor shall meet such program and administrative requirements as shall be prescribed by County through its Health Officer and Alcoholism Prevention and Rehabilitation Coordinator, pursuant to Section 5678(b) of the Welfare and Institutions Code, Division 5. (Community Mental Health Services), Part 2. (The Short-Doyle Act), Chapter 2.5 (Alcohol-Prevention and.Rehabilitation Program). 3. Reports. Contractor shall submit program reports to AIRS each month, describing activities, and client-hour contacts. In addition, Contractor shall submit to AIRS a Status and Evaluation Report on November 1, 1975, March 1, 1976, and June 30, 1976, regarding the accomplishment of the service goals and objectives specified above and the effectiveness of the services provided. 4. Allowable Contract Costs. In accordance with Paragraph 3. (Allowable Costs) of the Payment Provisions, the allowability of Contractor's costs that have actually been incurred under this Contract shall be determined in accordance with applicable State regulations, including, but not limited to, the State Department of Health Community Services Systems Manual, Chapter 9. (Accounting Guidelines), Section 9.5 (Allowable Costs). Initials: Contractor County Dept. -2- 00144 -2- SERVICE PLAN 2_SERVICE' PLAN Number 2 S. Annual Audit. In accordance with Paragraph 7. (Audits) of the Payment,;Provisions-- 77 Contractor shall provide County with anannual audit prepared by a Certified;Public, Accountant, verifying the cost report submitted pursuant to ,Paragraph 6. (Cost Report and Settlement) of the Payment Provisions. 6• State Approval. This Contract, any extension hereof, and any modification or amendment thereto, shall be of no effect unless and until reviewed and approved by the appropriate State agency. Initials: Contractor County P.ept. r .. 1. • -3- v 11"415 f Ysi M, • IN TUE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION . OF - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Resolution ) ' Authorizing Signatures in ) Absence of County Superintendent) - )Lesolution No. I -- 74-75 WHEREAS, governmental agencies need assurance that properly authorized signatures appear on project agreements and other required contracts, and WHEREAS, Floyd I. Marchus, County Superintendent of Schools, may not always be available to sign documents within the designated time, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that these agencies be informed that the following individuals have been duly authorized to sign all legal documents for • the Contra Costa County Superintendent of Schools Office: Robert Fifield, Associate Superintendent, Administrative Services Richard Keefe, Associate Superintendent, Special Education Robert Hughes, Accountant Edith Cotler, Director, Business Services PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 14th day of August, 1974 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: (S) Tapp, Rucobo, Williamson, Spears, Mauzy NOES: (0) ABSENT: • (2) Ruiz, Bardellini - I HEREBY CERTIFY that the fore�oi.ng is a true and correct copy of the resolution approved by said Contra Costa County Board of Education on August 14, 1974 P esident, Contra Costa'Pounty Board of Education RF:Is - f 00143 r e ;n tie r4of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Californias September 2 , 19..75 - r In the Matter of Approval of Agreement with City of _ Richmond for Summer Program for Disadvantaged Youth The Board having considered the request by the County Probation Officer and recommendation of the County Administrator; 1T 1S BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute on behalf of the County an agreement with the City of Richmond under the terms of which the County Probation Department will receive=$600.00 to administer a summer program for disadvantaged youth from August 4, 1975 to; September 30, 1975, PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that tha,foregoing is a true and carred copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid_ : V►r;ness m County Probation Officer y Probation Department cchand and the Seal of the Board of cc. Attn: Wallace C. Donavan Supervisors Contractor affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 •75 c/o Probation Officer J. R. OLSSC?dJ, Clar:< County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By. Deputy Clerk H 24 2204 -'15-M N. In aham 0014'7 Jb 7, �'=:h t., z:: ' r '' :~ �: ^"l.r xr'sn c..x .r r �� 1• i• •t'"" .',y':t: § #s ',"^^'r,.ea t, s: 'k"s'� az ':< w r > z. - •;' vI . -_' f.� l i••li -i, \ ��, �: . , `` SIL►1r4,_ d' .)fir .'. ,+c •m '* k i ri (t- •i i f► t L: i f l 1 t.: t l ilk i t.{.L. dl" •t `s' -•` �'`,�},le �#' -.3 .r"'. J e `. ` t ,.48, L L.+.,. !/� ,v.� It4 +r' 4 f �'�F`-€'+4„ "3A ,a.k,,Y'.'t li i,c.. .. 1 �, a T tr'- r.'.`h ,;xr�a .F 1 ,•n 4.• _ ,_, X ♦ �* t r y F r t . t + :Au`ust 4 ,t r 'n t '.rtb'ue`.,.t +,e�Ilix t}1(. "`�. �.' t tlL' tf il 1:C'1tL1'(tt /lllh .:> Ga g, .2 C! :.rr , Jt l,_ aali\ 1l}t.' t t $ 7 , ,, 1 , .• ',ta, tri ti = ! Oi L}1 ' W� w-�r.iLl'4 Cl, , t 1Gt,° {dna il'Cl 4'" � o �,� ! .- !j t•2.�1 tan ir• 1i ttt C IlF2 t� ,a ( t. ^.. n-r,,c1 =r.,t ztj�{ t�^C . T • t r , : S_tl -! 1 werrCtd ►•31]l• t,�12 r i&,>'s-- �• -. T =sa „_ t , n l i .. tI t < l } :a-.`;—", (,ti 1 f !} t (. t,!t•v.� ] n X32-1"" ':t`{�rg `, 41MOR s+t ii LC Gt + 1 , �,* . , Y f '' .tea f r/,+,'•'iz :� 'rl" j (' • :.tTL•`t n `� L 7 Int fa al L 3 1 'U '1 ./ !� . ,u# > ' �,lt 1 !Ir'i ,'ti al rftl\(1 I (Cl l lal2 It t C., tl ii t ' r y `°=." a'' er•" a �1. w c� � �f .► + . ,al := i. a' it 1111 c.ML'. i� )0'1 i -. c, lila c,L) y x<... Gr7.f a r'O 1C .o4..J., fill 2�•i;c.n .,•�o�, -r t r F rm 'r z rix � t., ,, :_ : .�� ( T \C ,� li 1 }tet�,1 r. I i, i •t:IlC Ut<': lF+trl .111 a'(CUIa! 1' . to ti t� 'C• }l( tt.I a)u ��•a�l 1 t + �a] n': '-: :d . Q .1 aC �::Si}rc,Cl:lzilll ry\::atrl ^T'I r�Z t�}1► itY+ � 4600043 , ,) 4 .;ilttt\:1�•'t.,j '1:'t'132f((I LT1`t.i'1 C)1�,: a l '. ,"3 „r�`' .r'�W,3 �,�-_1�^Z•' ,ry tr'a�i 7 { r `..,. ! $ .4/75 tc)' 1%fin; [ . 02�l1:'a '1C C� I,l . cl,ci , Ot t (' ) k'�a,�tCm1�iV�Lp1��°�i��'y�� ... a( 1111n,- ! i ,, s uc}? .r 1 i . F"•3."r t.cin y7``X L, ss lit IC. at �i► titi (:I t'Ccl'Olt1 t,' " } Count G U1 j \ �\ I' 1G lr',c t r��.Iul .►,,, ; :. Cin tca c.os to y t S , x , ,, r ," sR `• C t 1 ' • ! r}1 ,)t la ra., a 't a t,x iiCXl]I!'iaGR 01 �t`il1i1C l 3 tT4=! l'C clrrLll(\ � !'� ;E t1 ! ! t i1,t I _ a h { t r � T=, � .°.... 1, & ,.` , ':'�1 •� C('itt tt rr t .'f,�`\ '(,1 Otis ai (11,);tt Fya T,)ra " rpt} C,i Gl]� t 1 hx, rx ` :t], i t"31.i r{llt , ('ll I)t.11 Oi ttld ..[~3.tj/ t r r -, . �.. -sr.x y�, _,"-�t'.z�-'iS� £��Z nc'�fs`t�' t(1 11 t .. } �Of +�iCl1.t7'�:i j)1t>",CltCsi.lCt: 1('CI 'n- OII(1Ld' at. tt'•'�Cr,a1t.0i�tt.tx. � " - •.' , , _ • t a •} 221>21 i lac^( 1C!?i11C21t C,` li*ttic'l 1 Ct`=]� lOt*yatCO1 &i �3s: (21.1i1tC ti{ f is tilttt) }i+"t!1 latl„tc, !( tc i!e(i ; O . ., t Il L , -'i • 4.'._ llta_4lG t ])t'tCr,'trt tl, })1Oht. Ca Or CGI tl~Lf(f �Aa �sz '" ,CI lilt _ a ak I 1 j " • :, r '' tt i 1 01' p C'ai-1i Oi <iti2ltlr+ll Org- to TJfM lt.i I''t',' ' ► ! tI Z) 'I+ „ :Lt:._' !i, a , .7ti aet} � �1)Ic L 1 1 It all} t f • iih.p" 5 :n m t,? 4,. ?, u `, ., . 1'1.1_1• �,rl ,`, "tee •• G. t11C°d::-hall ! a \ss tl'C ,IF'1;•�tC!'. a ^i1t,;, ,S Can:r,,art -." = n`xs ] z\1 nl: . i c� I',I 1 1,..1�OI. . , :1 1 ae 3? tc..a tC > „' ! 1;' i :Ia 11 } t.,,11 w' T1 r '.A'L� (.• •\•♦ rat , ' taa N e 1 '1 Olt ,, . la- \ C 1 i>F(. .LM IG. �, "s11.1I1 IT` .t _., 1 .t101\ ,. il!`il . , .tai t , T ( ), _1, �_, s f a. a, ,::i '• , t' iii .'t}i$ CO";.j tl fil (tt t�, I'i 'tet � ie.'c0 erig,--i •L'Il' tii,C ��) l'►t�('. j`l. tt.2!]2 alll ,'411.\ItI(..,.-IJt taL.1C}TTtit.+.£ ► C r a ;.!,y� v' �� r �)�' ' r ?�'�., AIl)bun Oa sql ci] l0.1I11r�y.0r 'r„2111th'+ E. 1'.Q��yw c a ,. /-�1 I�) } t a T Ta ti ♦r'. i\t TT• , t '1 a 2 .�111 1 , 1 GI •CO llu 1 a t_l Or '.drr:�,_1 t.'•_,, , AL 'f y 7 \t : 1ti T I Ii 1P1 .,.C)� ,:U ,. 0 tee _ „� a n .' .f-. -a 1.@Fllr(I1C i "�:.}L:i-. }Ii `ilt ti r l)C t a'\l2iat}31l'�gfq s �S�r '.s �o VN a, _% X' ll'l�1)tc� :- - (1 c tl `:U\ l} lam . t,rCt :.,• • 1 �:r: rr i. I, . ;:=r. Sr:Ii'r,IZ =L; (.) .' 1�� f\: X11 If-1 i�to�r ' :�,. z ;Il]cI>t \t 111 L' ],til:tun nit:rl 1n ;a=ccnl c" n(e °it 1LI! t ( L ' 6 -� i x l � c t ,• : Cc'111L`Of `{li')Ci�_ft nrr GrU tia^a it 1tt Nt'�y Sr�fCC, tO ,w } ! t ;:! ] n i c1 s ur t, p ('„1 '. tl* .1.,�1ovelu lil C_1 t r .ti .$r? =f '� ' t)iC f 1 i)]t t( ' t• �� '';.12;)112y�t:P£ile }1':C a=t8 7101 `atiI 11(� ;1Z@(lr t'tJ1z' C�' gk"a; r 1!11'.1 2(','1� d }Ll 1 GIC1.1111 .C),..C) Cltl tc.l\t 1 t }-` a ►r , ir' t } ALL i IC?\� tl i c� '1 ctcl�t=illy 'dt 4 5Q4.00 fai, e•t12 l -16d�-F rt ` 3 :hI } .)}11�. .I,I C C t1)S: Z Fw wx� sn : „aM : �� :*.. "n • ., , •�' `I10-'.= .^\ ,r I2(2It:i2aC, ":fC1 �. j f2 <�i]I012f11C�#1.\111:1%r . ' y'. •'� _:.j lan C1 at2ttC'C, a,11 aIIi >it]) i t ,E.', C\ .Ill ltt_ 11]CI _..s• [• ?, : .�, .,x-j..T_.'`:•- 'J,;-`.- . 4li7� ,1�_ . F. ''•. nt':r : •t`'t 1a. ItiC -lC1 tne' Untt ..?tC \l'Il0 l,�,Il , 113r1 tr .J,thc' ' �\1t1L j:lll(j lt1CC i � r . ORD dircetive.- rs may bcrome'venerally ap0i- --reimbursed expenses reasonably and neem rily . c.;Ue at any time; (") submi..aon by the Mie_ irrurred in satisfactory performance of tile con- _' t..fe .o 0 O or to the Cm—ntee of reports that are tract, Notwithstanding the above..the Da"gate Incorrect or into::nplete in any Mldt'•i.al respt•:t: shall not be reiiered of liability-to" the Cr.a:ttee - (3) ireXertive or impropmr use of funds pro:ir.ed for damages sustained by the Grantee by virtue under this contrwt; and (.1) su:pen.-ion or ter- of any breach of the contract by the Delegate mination b• OIM of the p;tant to the Gr,ntze and the Grantee may withhold any r6hn.burac- undcr which this- contract is made. or the portion meant to the Delegate for the purpose'of jet-off thereof delegated by this +contt:act, The Grantee lentil such time as the excel. am-ou::t of dam ages may alaao assign at:d transfer this cuntrtart to due the Grantee from the Delegmte"is agreed upon . another grantea when required to do su by OEO or otherwise determined. direction. 9. XON-FEDERAL SHARE. The Deleb;ate If the Dela„ate is unable or unwilling to com- will contribute Y.sow... to the prograw fuhd3 ply with such additional conditions as way be Such contribution shall be in cash In the amount lawfully ,liplied by OFA to the grant to the of $Nolte..•... and in-kind in the amount of Grantee.the Deler.ate shall terminate the contract $.Bim.... (If none. state "none.”) by giving rea-sonable written notice to the Gi:antee. 10. REVIEW OF NEW DIRECTIVES. the - signifying the etitctive date thereof. In such Grantee will submit promptly to the Delegate for event the p;r.ntee may require the delegr:ate to comment those proposed additional directivea en:ure that adequate arra,agements have been that it receives frosts 0E0 i& comment. made for tate traw.fer of the delez.ated a ctivNes In witness whereof.the Granule and the Dole- to rwo!.%�i D,-1z%.-e or t a i:le t•ii:ii!st'. vele law n' e:iEcn.w. «-• taia aS:ze:a:nt :.3 of tate ....e In ell.•. avcatt of any termination. all property To Y.ri and finished or unfinished documents. data. �01001 � -. studies. And reports purchased or prepared by "" '` � •• the Delegate under this contract shall be dL-ptosed Delegate Of according to OEO directives. and the Dalegate :By d • shall be entitled to compensation for any un- Position: Positl . December 1968 / PAAAAACI.- COUNVAPI CONFOr COSTA CAL LXft 1 �d✓'' , 99M Chairman, Board of SupdrIlsors Attest: J. R. Olsson, County Clerk MRORARAM Deputy �Re7commen by Department— IrO:�•I APPRO I j2fx AVMtY COMd L. - • Designee Nva ss�.sas • • . 00149 ATTACHMENT - A SCOPE OF SERVICES The Delegate shall in a satisfactory and proper manner as determined by the City of Richmond perform the following services: A. The Delegate shall provide excursions and recreational activities. for approximately 200 youth between the ages of '8 and 14. B. The Delegate shall purchase necessary transportation for four (4) field trips. n 00150, sonommmmmmmommmmmmmmmMMMMMMMMOMOO RECORD The Delegate shall keep and make available for inspection,b! , authorized representatives of the Grantee, the,Commnnity Services , ' Administration, and the Advisory Council, the delegate regular'` busiuets records pertaining to this agreement and such additional records as may be reasonably required; by the 'Grantee. ,REPORTS: The Delegate sha3.l submit to the Grantee a Participant Characteristic- Report and a Narrative Close-out Report no later than one week after completion of all program activities. (Attachment) i i ... ... . .'.. .n .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. :. r. . ..... ... .. ... .. .. '!:k'•ry F ....,.:.... . .. 1. .. ,.... '�35�:[ .;::T: .....est^_1p'a'r:: ,.�:` ,Cyd' .,..- .. - si'Ii :y,. r. x. ... .... .. .. .. roV rn. t' ... ... ,11� ^.r= s, s, r..+ n. .... .. ... .. .. ....._.... .,. .S k. �i� lr. �„ .. ....14,... t dik ',.. a zj, .. ... `"vr.......:z.__.--:.,—..._._:�..w�xr:w ..: .. ... .. .... .. n.ua`.,.u.....e..r..�..6 �u.m_�.w...aa_.!•..� .. ..fin. .:n':�'1,:. :.... x-. M.l ,-y . . . .. .. ... .. ... .. .. :. .. % .. .. .. .. .. . . . _ . .. .. .. - ... .: .. . . ..... . ...: . .. .. .. . . . .: .. .. ... it.. : . .. _ .. .. .. .. .. .. : .. .. . . . .. ... .. . .. . . . . .. y{ . . .. .. . ' .. `•:i .. . .. ' ',;Jr. . .. .. .. .. .. . , ;::A x tiki! . .. .:. .. .. .. ... . .... ;Y,' :N . . . .... .. • ... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. T . ." -��, _ .. ... .':':.:'. �� .. .. . .. .. ... .. .. .. ...... -! . • .. .. ... - - -�-- .. .. . .. .. . . ' . . '.. 5z� .. .. .. .. .,. .. .. ,, .. , .�.... . -�... �(� ... .. .1.. ... . . • ... - }} . .. :.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Yr.:H'i:a'f�JISt ".: .. .. . .... .. .. ,.' _ t. .. .. - - . .. .. . ... �;.- . . .. .. .�� C• a._. —. C - F s . A _ .. . . .. .. - =.�s,4.'.�. '4.'. . A. ..1:�; i as icat_or� o a licat:or.�. s� ch was:°:used=:to} rt,;:` ,:<.:,,;„;r;r_..,: . -- a 1 t� 3 r . -N: . r . . 't .. .a. :.t:.. F.::.5.. determinfu s enrollment .and resident, locition`. oma: each:` art-,':;: ° = =;; . .. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . :. . _ . . . . a:- : gi 1. zfv',, t: i. ... ,:....: -'r.fk i n _ �. .; . _ .. `,-: .. . . . . . . .. : . :.v`:. ` y,r. . . ... . .. .. .. . . .. .. ........... - .: .. .. _ .. .. . . .. ::.:. }dpi,;r,;:x:-,.�.J p� r..• �” �l'l ve.n l f a• a• O.'.. ..••s'!!Lf'' zlf:Aff %i:'; ' '',:.�•;.C,;„., .1, _. .. .� .. ....�3^.a a r?..:_'13_..•rL5 zS o. t2lI:.• .Z t`=::Ft< .:....Rt':..:: ;r',:r•' i r1 . . . .. ' =. . . . . :s': " ' . .. . .. . . , ,:... . �;,r . . .. �. ;u;r.,l. v d. to su o. .r t. a Services aro 1&e . PP . . :.") :. .. ... :: .. - ..... .. % .. .. .. ".: ... ., .. . .. ��., .. .. . .. .. - .. _. . .. '.. _ - ...: . . . .: . . .. .. . .. - - .. .. .. . • .. .. 1. .: .. .: : . . .. 'V. 4'� . .. .. . . : . . . .. .: .. .. . : . . . . ... . . ....' . .. . .. .... . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . : .. _ ... '. �zR'i ��Si:ka. . : ,'y;i; .. .. .. .. W . .. . . .. '..Y�V . .. .. . ”s'. . ol. ;' . .. .. . .: : . .-R . . i,, " ,-j: . .. ... . . .. ..'. ..gar .&'. .. .. : : _ _ .. . . .. .. ...,..'. '=''�� ... - „.n. �:i:�a �;t�:w . - . .. .. .. . ,:1'tiYc-:d.:.. .'ky .. .. .. .: .. ... .. .. .;. .}� .. .. .. .. .. .. .. _.. .'.'. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. . . . .. . % . :.: .. . .. . . . .. .: .. . .. . .. ... ::+rjF . ;'' .. .. .. ':?:. ol. 1. .. :. ... . . . . ... .. .. . " �K, .: ... ... .. . :'mar .. ', . . .. . . : . .. ... .. ;-!'r . .: . ' :.'*.': .. . .. .. • • .. .. . .. . .. : ., . . . .. .. . . . .. ... .. . ,� .. . • �%„� .. . . . . _ . ,w,} :., .. .. .. .. .. .. .: .. - .. .: .... .. .. ,. ... .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... . ... ..- .. .. .. ... ... .. ... . . .. ... , .. 1. om. : �1 . ... ... .. .. .. ..... ....... 2.'..5:.fi�. . .. .. .. .. -11 ;rf;. .�-... .. ... .. .. . . ... .. .. - .. ... .. ... .. .. .. .. .. ::.: .e - :"$. . . :cf .... (` Yt" .. .. .... % ...t,,...'^. ..: ..a .. .•r,..... _:.x - - f a dK p • E: . i 5� t d , c t ATTACHME"T A. The Grantee or his Representative :fill evaluate ,t te- prate a*n ' f es .n_�... the qtr a period. a ;.�1 ni�aa o_, one time c:L__ .�; �r ate_ ea_nt. p__ 03 .. v r. qx -t e • t oort � W 1 �" MMIBIT "BUDGET ri EQUIP-E,V£ $200.00 TRANSPORTATION 400.00 TOTAL AWOUNT • s meq'. 015: � rrfi O:Cir„[ Of :CON10.r:lC CNIS i&LINlTy Cusuint:i,eaY A C.4an ?.C:;r.::n : I•'i�..':i�it a._ ti• • rriii:•.L.4.i�•..�. tti.ii'= �i�t�. ■•� s . Tit!a V i 0: e::na :.;.•ei w4c;:-i to Aci: of'f::a g* Contra Costa County (hereinafter called the "Applicant"), (\alar of .1p,li:.•te ar:l:;:e,.�:e Asecr;i AGREES THAT it will comply A ids tier:'l of thrCieil Rig r3 A:t of 164(P.L. 55-352)and :he Regulations of the Oifice of Econo aic opp a:tunity -"%:ed pursuant to that ti::r (45 C.F.R. Pace 1010), to the end that na person in the United States shat.'. on t%C mound of race. color,or national odgia, be excluded from pa:tici- : pation•in.b: denied the benefits a:.of be o:!%rrcrise subjected-.0 discrimination under any,p:oyr..m "aeti•:icf for which the Applicant tecriv;s Federal icnancial assistance either eti:ectly or indirectly fro..-%the Office bl Fconamir Oppotcunit ;and HEitI:BT GiV .: A-SSCRA CE T11 tiTic will immediately.:Mall ptases.and levels of programs and activities, ins:.%I! an af;:=atire action pr*;.—zni to achieve equal orpoctuatties for partici- , ration. v:id% provisio..s for tfiectire -L-4a :e self-evaluation.1n the case where the Federal financial assistance is to provide or improve or is in the fora of-personal: property,or real property or interest dSerein o: structures thereon. tete assurance shall obli j.ate the Appl'c ane.. or.in die case of a subsequent transfer. the transferee, for the period during which the pros:cy is used.far a. purpose for which the Federal financial assis:ance is extendedor for another purpose involving the provision : of similar services and benefits.or for as long as the Applicant retains ownership or possessio%of the -.OP-' erty, whichever is longer. In all othe:cases. this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period due-. : ing which the Federal financial assistance is extended to i:. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consileratioa of a:14 for the purpose of obtaining either directly or indirectly : any and all FWarat gtants. loans. eor.::acts. rror.c.m. o: diseo•:ncs, ghe rule::al o: assignment of VII-STA : volunteers. or o:her Fcderal financial assistance extended.afrer the date hereof to the Appiicanc b:. dhe Office of Kcanomic Oppo:tuns •. including install:-lent payments after such date on account of appr;zeadons for Federal financial assistance which were a:►a:o:e•i 'befo:e such date. The Applicant:ocogaites and a.rc:•s. that sura Fr.!eral financial as:sis:aace wi'.! be ex.-ead.ed in reliance on the repres_arscioas and sg:era=er.:s made in this assurance. and that the C :---rd S=tes s'= 11 have the right co seek judicial cnio.—e.menc o:t is.. : assurance. This assurance is bindic:on, the App:ica.•tt, its successors, transferees.and assigaees, and the person or persons whose signatures appear below are auchosized to siga this assurance on behalf of-the. . . Al+pi;cant. • Date � — Contra Costa County - �!• S (Name of A,plica:a Deirasta A jW:teF) : (PgrAWke,Ch tinran of Board,or eomparablr nn 1 s horixr official) I— CAP FORM 11 jnvv.juu i91 PRSvtous aotTt.7Ns Assn ouso%t ft. Js i0,t/r+,•,Pw+h•sM•.:. ,ry�_'ft. "'+ fes:1 � .••.. �.' i � Y � � ~. .. } � .�- �: ±.�' •� ,f to v t Z = x s S - . `• f'r'" S 7r s v s 9 ! a �1. y i may' r z m , ;t s :c• t o cr. r. Y. 2p en 1r '• .• -0 f A Q f+t r• 1=I x•ar I fi cp r r t a �' rr la x. 7 _ !f 1 •f i ... ' ! GSv A Q� Q It• •• ~ z s •-! l t s ! a �.'• 'sr 1 = i ij• A po z > f r Pt 1 P cp ; rs • : � ! i + = 9 4 Com. .. • f r. %n%: of Lb cp 1 + t ' i i • T A 7'•Y Cl •' �•^a.•...a•n..... ti.arrr.a . •�... .war.rte.iA.. �urMil�'� : OFFICE OF EC"IOMC 01-POZ TUTU IT-COX-MUTT 4C I10%PROGM4M ....... • I. NAseC OF GR4NTLX 2. Gk►.NT 110. PROGRAMS Tr- ACM12 CITY . ....�.. • C1':1 OF RIC!:..;:::7 94600043 - '75 7. SMCIAL COND1110:aSNr�ICs TO: fti. 0 ALL PROGnAY ACCOUNTS f-f GRAf.t •--T14'4 S. s�01`LV PnOCRAY AC-OJ.-AT xJMYE"is1 GQ—� 71:e rrau: h. f ubi::t cr the tpe.i:l Condition in ad'.liclon, to the aNpkcsl•!e Genesi Caadidear.pvc.-f:nx gnats undef Tidc It n: il:-ii ..i the 1.'Coe AL s is;•-a:::::sick ACC Di 1964 as:aiuf:u!ed. AS.1glM MMEMES: Ibis forst shall he sinned aa: the g--= time as the CSA 314 and returned to,-.ether with the copy of the CSS 316 to CS:t. 'Ilia Grantee (Sponsor) assures t::e Oj-zunity Services Administration that:. 1. It will not (and lies not) b2class2 of this grant, reduce funds previously • planned for sus::xr South recreation activities. .2. That the sponsor will subs-t a report on the results of the program no later than 10-15-75, utilizing &.a forms to be provided by CM. 3. That arran.Zelnents havc bran made for appropriate bonding of grant officials. 4. A financial report will ba sub:titted to CM by 10-20-75 on forms to be pro- vided by CSA. 5. CSA audit requirements will be complied with. 6. Yarticipant3 will not be exposed to conditions which are unsanitary- or haz- ardous or dangerous to their safety or health. 7. All transportation services under this program will be from sources properly licensed and insured to provide ccrraige of public and tiich are operated In compliance wilth all Stace ardior Federal statutes covering public transporta- tion. S. The grantee will allot• full access to its activities and records (pertaining to this prang) to CS& personnel and the personnel o: such other institutio w as may be: selected by MA. 9. All program activities d*le:sated to another agency, will be contracted for and such contracts :.•ill u, stir-=fitted to Ca+ for approval before I=p1q :entank (It is undrrstoo:l teat c::y contracts suk fitted in the fora of a "Torre 280" Meet this roquirac rt. 10. Cancral liability iisur2nce (i,adily injury type) protects the sponsor agai:tst claims arising from bodily injury or denen to third parties, including youc:ts participating in the recreation support program, occurring oa its business preol ses or through its operation, except those arising from rotor vehicles &%&ty from the prc•aixes, those- covered; by are; lbrimenfs Co=pansation Lacy, and one. c xt et i�:.;: :aL..t:.L .. Isle a c, . mss•;etirr.l co.e_....- for bodily- jury +ac•s}jury b11all be $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident. In tl.o case of those organizations u:tich could raise the defense of sovereign ite+reatity, the insurance policy shall provide that this defense will not be raised by the organization of the insurer; and 11. autormbile liability insurance coverage of $100,000 per person and $300,000• per accident for bodily injury and $5,000 per accident for property d.—C&ya is provided and that auto:.7bi le comprehensive and collision of at least $100 deductible is prov&ded. r • Kenneth N. Smith CivVto •�.�itt_ r Cif:.. .�L� ! !• [l pc Iuatae Bud tttTa; at -grantee Sigp-sture of granter enter nisi 1. - • official CAI. FOR11 29 INEw.#&ua Mf NLPLP CC&CAP rpf.wt 2"is%m.1%6 D4Tt•D NArf w AMA Dc �!.f: CAP*OWN MM.DATCD AVG We wNICN ARC OPSM ETC. � . _. :..,v.�. ACV— Got ::11 CY. �' ,� 4±i:.:.i •.di. [-ItOC-.Wr V .. AL • �T.» ..0,.:D 94600043 - '75 i.;f iY 0�' fif.�.3.t:.i }. � i;'fAt.4"�Sii.f7111f Res'. :.5 :G•: . ' 1 a. l �J.t,t. f'i:i?Glfw►'.s''L.•'...:r f•. 4i:.•!:i RCt:;r :tom:: �✓::CY i'l�thiRF (4CGCn,'M.7 f:lf ri%cfi[if—_�60/6 '.--•-_• .. '-• ii'i: :..:.: f:. �tl�•) is,�! 'r.: .r::�::is•:. •.:. . :.�.::S::i in:�.t• i•7ft:-.fir.— 4t.i i: t`.'5.::•�� 1 .......•f-.221:: tspt�e( •��::�� = ty.� =.= [its: �;S�:IG•:t:��!j':.--- •tt :iC[ ie! 1 SPECTAL rJ DITIC%? REG RO i M EQUIP:TENT $ SUPPLIES 1. Equipment with a Price in excess of $200 may not be purchased under this grant unless the specific written consent of MAX is obtained. This grant does not constitute such consent." .. 2. Equipment frith a price of less than .1200 may not be p:trehased-.. unless it uas listed in the approved proposal or an approved amendment to the proposal. ' . 3. All equipment lists must be specific.. That is, a reference to. "sports equipment" or '!craft equip^ent"gill not be adequate.' ' They must be at least as specific as: -baseballs and bats and either the approximate number- or approximate cost ' i -camping stoves and either the approximate. number or approxi:.-ia r.4 cost -baseball cloves and either the approximate number or approxinate cost 4. Everything, hick is nat naturally used tip in its initial use. (craft suppl'ics and food are exanples of things ttihich are naturally consumed at first use) shall be defined as equipment..': S. Equipment and supplies purchased 3+rith these grant funds shall be for the sole use of the sum:xer youth recreation and transporta:.i prograi:. A, Any supplies remaining at the end -of the. program must either be stored for use next summer or purchased from the project by the grantee. B. Equipnent remaining at the- end of the proaran must be • available at the beginning 'of next surnner ,in at least as good condition as at the and of this suncmer. s •tr 6. Records sufficient to audit grantee compliance xit!x "tits :Irtiova shall be }sept. • - ' .� a OFFICE OF ECONOMIC 4:•t'CnTL•:.::Y -Cty:►rlr l'tY AiTt•^,jt I+raG�rFt:Ut[:.' ' t. 16"A OF GRAVY LL 2. GRAM T no. PROaRA .%-$L.. itCri�.• • CITY OF FI CIE., :3 946000+3. - 275 ! : - 3. :.►•CCIAL CONMTION ArPUSS To: A. n ALL PNOGItAN ACCOUATS IN GRaetT ACTvan S.-- -*NLT PnOGRAM ACCot/ti i "UVASE R:i1 6 = :'lli. grater is sc;ljacc to :!:c �,ecial Candetian behiv• in addition to the appiieaL!a.Gc.-wrm1 Cotl.licioR:r.&a�e:iteiut f:.aue under Title It nc 1:1-it at the Ecaao=ie Vpp4gtuaity Act of 1964 as acrt-dett. ' Cv\UITIO::S ftii'PL1'I.':C '!1p 1LT.. SU:ti?,?. t0'v 1 C:' 1TION GUi:TS 1. Grant funds may not be used for nut_itionalpurposes.. , iio�rever funds:°laay tics:::;.;. used for the p::rchase of food incidental to trips, and overnirjtt c;npout:s..' such food exacnd=tures are specif;ed in tile. approved 'vork program: 2. In any instances of conflict between the proposal and. applicable. CS&,"a'uidc— 'lines or tletu•cen the proposal =nd these conditions, the applic27016, lines. and conditions shall prevail. ''•....-= • 3. No actions shall be aid for under -ilia +' 1� p grant in addition to thtise-'.s0aciffod: in the approved %.-ark program. Houaver, reductions in. the number between the grantee and CSA shall be considered as change in the: WOrk-:'P.ro&:rmai:';:'! •. Opr I.MN Lar �u•�\•1��ark•• :a••�t,r.cs--+M. • w,ma"... SF x. arae:r'e�� 'raeW!.rw tna•; =iCsii�js • 94600043•- - ' '75' r: • CITY Or RTCer:.O::D •• (.� -�rr;+.:rr�x wecarss.r:eK WiY:T�.1i�!r rec:r v eosrws ACMM—, MW%LftM'6p/64-:, • WS.ppm is. r44"m ra dze j-reit: Cmceew•c.1.;!a4•. its xd dm w\dee;v,-;Iiczbk C\mo,e:.eI i.\.;;Oas p.-rriaat Tick J ar 1::•:.R art r:+r i:ene.ae is 4.•;tix: !sr of I%-i orr•ar cift . =: i SPECIAL CONDI?IO2 StEG13 IM 'LLVSPOfCPA MN: 1. At Least lOZ of the f•�ds under this grant':shall be.. ° :• • expended for tLc transportation of yo:iths 8114 .Y"];S . of age. ' 2. These funds may not- be used for transportation ■or+a~. • : ' r.:.s�:`;{ • than 200 riles outside the boundaries• of•'the gractQe. VnIess specific written permission is granted b CSA.•. ' • f1Y:r; • • • •Yr f%:•1•0 • _•Y7 :Z7,WA • - - -ice �-••�••w•w•.•- .�-•.••�•-�•�•••�.w.-••. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Colifomia September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter cf Submission of Grant Application to LEAA Regional Office. On the recommendation of the Steering Committee for the Emergency Telephone System Committee (9-1-1) , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that its Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute an application for submission to the U. S. Department of Justice, Law Enforce— ment Assistance Administration, for grant funds in the amount of $135,000 for the purpose of studying the county emergency commun— ications system and developing an improved communications and dispatch system for all public safety agencies in the county. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: LEAA Regional Office (3) Worms my hand and the Seal of the Board of Office of Criminal Justice PlSupervisors anning Sacramento, CA affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 75 County Auditor-Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator gy Deputy Clerk Maxie M. Neufeld H 24 W5 IOU X45 A.PPR7VAL EKPINES. 1';,4•75 U.S. DEPARTNIENT OF .JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRANT . LACY ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS ADMINISTRATION PAGE 1 ' f,pprrcation is rterabY made for a grant under Sections 306 CLEAVE BLANK-FOR OFFICIAL. USE ONLY/ Application Number &nbio, A55 of the Omnibus Gime Control and Sate Suaets Act CX 1SSB (r. L.. 90.3511 at amended in the amount and for the Date Received Region Assigned x•aosas set forth in this application. ' 1 andr. Tule of Prejeer- (Do not aAceed one-typed line) FMRRf:FNrP mm?,7mTrATTO*)S (Y?NSOT TDh'1'TON QTUDY y.oe of Application: )Check One) )d5L Original OR wi an Q Continuation of Grant No. D.Z.at.onary Program Under which Application is Made: Comprehensive Data Systems �ra�.c: Duration: 5. LEA^ Support Sought Total Length months 5. &_135,000 ;. artt w implementing Agency or GowrnmanW Unit: 7. Proiact Director (Name, title, address, and telephonel &Varna. &cores&. and telephone) Board of Supervisors - Robert M. Rygh,. Deputy Director Contra Costa County Public Works Department P.d�:(ulistration Building Contra Costa County* . xdxninne�, CA 94553 Courthouse, Room 115 (415) 372-2214 MartineZ, CA a — -;,y. Officer (Name, tiva. address, and setaphor►e) 9. Official Authorized to Sign Application shame, I.tre II. D. F1umk, Auditor-Controller address. and tstephane) Contra Costa County - Warren N. Boggess, Chairmen Finance Building Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County Martinez, C_n- 94553 (415) 372-2181 (Same address as Item No. 6) i.rmrnery - - - Summariza, in aPproaimate/Y 200 words, the most important pans of the statement of prorscs p.an p•e.cmao In a,-•pucation Item 21 (Pipe 71. briefly covering project goals and Prcgram methods, impact, scope, ata evs.wtion The purpose of the project is to study the emergency communications system in Contra Costa County and to develop an improved communica- tions and dispatch system for all public safety agencies' in tI Contra Costa Bounty. ' I - I . r MIMIC& Microfilmed with brd order. n f�•a APPLICATION FOR GRANT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS /yr'•+ •. LA%V ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE PAGE 2 ADMINISTRATION ...t• Ii .y . undaruke i U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRANT • -LAIN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS �\ l•.. '1JRt1 . �\ ADMINISTRATION PAGE 2 11. DETAILED PROJECT BUDGET — lndude this estimated coat or value of alI resources necessary to undartare the project. L E A A GRANTEE CATEGORY CONTRITION SUPPORT f3U• TOTAL A. Personnel t@rnpiovees) T10N (1) Salaries (list each osiuon with salary rale and percents of time devoted) S S ISM 421 FICA. Retirement. alt:. _ S S S t $. Processional Services iltemizal Ili lnd\vidual Consultants (list bV individual or tVpe with two basis and amount of time cevoled) • s s (21 Contracting or Service Orranizations and Associations first each by typo with lee ba and amoualt d) s s ' (3) Construction Contracts S S 13 000 $15 000 $150 00 C. Travel (Ttansoortation and Subsister\ca1 (iternizel S S s D. Eculpment (Itemizel s s s E. Supal,es and Other Operal\n ERpenses lcommunicauans reproduction, indirect costs) (itemize) S f i S . t TOTAL PROJECT COST S s S 4faj� III Page 15 • S _ •. _ • • + 00W s:: ,c•y�r'�::<r. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRANT' ,.•.. a . LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE _ DISCRETIONARY FUNDS t«- �• ADMINISTRATION PAGE 3' 12. BUDGET NARRATIVE Begin below and add as many continuation pages I13e. 30, etcJ as tet► be necessary to relate the Items budgeted-to protect ectiviti&s, and complete the required tustiftstioo and &KPlmwtion of the project budget. .CONSULTANTS 'A total of $150,000 ($135,000 LEAA funds and $15,000 Local Match Funds) is budgeted for consultant services to' conduct-the communications study. and to prepare the technical design for the system selected. 'The, con . sultantIs work will be conducted in two phases. Phase I is estimated to require 9 man months of work @$2,500 per man month. Phase Il is ` projected at 51 man months @$2f500 per man month. . • 4 Chap III r:� e.-.► Page IT i�972 OCJA M, 4600. i APPLICATION FOR GRANT U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS �r•'i LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE PAGE 4 ADMINISTRATION Huopet Summary and Projection Prior Project .Present Successive Successive Successive Total Budget Categories Phases Phase Phases Phases Phases Personnel (Salaries and Benefits) Protesshonel Services , A. individual consultants r 8, General Conaracu $150,000 C. Construction Contracts Travel (Transportation and Subsistence) Equipment t Supplies and Other Operating Expenses TOTAL Duration of Project Phases (in rrtonths) 1$150,004 14. Federal Support. Will other Federal support be available 15. Federal Submissions, Have other Federal agencies for any pan of this project? Yes No X been contacted for assistance on this or similar if yes• identify end explain: projecu7 Yes No It Vol, identify and indicate status M STANDARD GRANT CONDITIONS - Applicant understands and &;rets that any grant received,directly of through its State bow enforcement planning agency designated under P. L. 94351, as amended as a mutt of this application shall be subject to and incorporate the following grant condition (I•) Report, The grantee shall submit• at such times and in such form as may be prescribed, such reports as the Law Morcement Asssittance Administration may reasonably require, including quarterly financial reports ono progress reports and final financial ono narrative reports. (2J Copyrights. Where activities supponed by this grant produce original books, manuals, films, or other copyrightable material.the grantee may copyright such, but LEAH reserves a royalty-tree, non-oxclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce• publish.and use such materials, and to authorize others W do eo. (3.) Patenu. If any discovery or invention wises or is developed in the course of or as a result of work performed under this grant• the grantee shalt rater the discovery or invention to LEAA, which will determine whether or not patant protection will be sought, how any rights therein. including patent rights• will be disposed of and administered, and the necessity of other action required to protect the public interest in work supported with Federal funds, all in accordance with the Presidential Memorandum of Oetooer 10, 1963• on Government Patent Policy. .(4.) Discrimination Prohibited. No person shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color of national origin, be exc:uata from participation in, be refused ane benefits of. or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under grants awarded pursuant to P. L. 90-351 as amended. or under any project, programs or activity supposed by this grant The grantee must comply with me provisions and reeuuements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and regulations issued by the Department of Justice and lne Law Enforcement Assistance Adminis. tration thereunder as a condition of -award of Feoeral funds and continued grant support required try Section 518(b) of P. L. 94351 as amended. This grant condition shalt not be interpreted to require the imposition in grant•suPPoned' protects of any percentage ratio,quota system, or other program to achieve racial balance or eliminate racial imbalance in a law enforcement agency. T 00 GCJE t •r t a rr•OV SAL 71 J*7 77-y73, 1. ;:••• U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION! FOR GRANT LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS AW01NISTRATION PAGE 5 STANDARD GRANT CONDITIONS—fConi'dj t5.1 Termination of Aid. This grant may be terminated or fund payments discontinued by LEAA where it finds a substantial failure to comply with the PrOvk;Oes of P. L.90-351 as amended or regulations promulgated thereunder, inctudinp these grant conditions or application obligations, but only after notice and hearing and pursuant to all procedures wt forth in Section 510 and 511 of P. L. 911351 as amended. (6.) Inspection and Audit. The Administration and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any,of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access for purposes of audit and examinations to any books, docur:senis, papers, ano records o1 the grantee, and to relevant books and records of subgrantees and contractor$. as provided in Section 521 of P. L. 90-351 as amended. A notice to this effect shall appear in all subgrants a" other arrangements for implementation of this project. Maintenance of Records. 'All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of a project, whichever is sooner. lBa Utilization and Payment of Funds. Funds awarded are to be expenoed only for purposes and activities covered t y grantee's approved project pian and budget. Proiect funds may be made available through a letter of credit system pursuant to rules and procedures as to establishment, withdrawals, etc., issued by the Administration and with which grantees-mutt comply.—Whare.Scent awards ant-not wtf;dently.large.to require this•sysism, payments will be.made on the basis of periodic requests and estimates of fund needs submitted by the grantee. Payments will be adjusted to costs= pre%ious overPayments or underpayments and disallowances resulting from audit. (91 Allowable Com. The allowability of costs incurred under any grant shall be determined in accordance with the general principles of ahowabilitV and :tandems tot selected cost items set forth in Bureau of Budget Circular No. A$7. "Principles for Determining Cosa Applicable to Grants and Contracts with State and Local Governments'% as further defined and delimited in eondruons 10 and 11 below, and to the L AA .nanc.ai Gu.00 for Adm.n.sirst.on of P17nning and Action Grants 00.1 Expernes Not Allowable. Grant funds may not be expended for (a) items not part of the approved budget or separately approved by LEAA; (b) purchase or construction of %ano aro buildings or improvements thereon, or payment of real estate mortgages or taxes, unless specifically ptovided for in the grant agreement; (c) cuss to organizations or federations; (dl entertain- ment including luncheons, banquets, gratuities or decorations; (e) purchase of automobiles or other automotive vehicles us-'ass provided for in the grant a;,recment; or (1) indirect (overhead) costs, where the grantee does not have an audited indirect expense allocation system and rate acceptable to LEAA; (g) any bonus or commission to any individual for the purpose of obtaining approval of an application for LEAA assistance. Expenditure of funds in excess of the submitted total cost estimate for any major budget category will be Pwrninad only with LEAA :,IProval where this involves an increase of more than 10 percent in the total category cost estimate. Such increases will be deemed, in effect, to constitute an amendment of the grant application and award requiring grantor concurrence. 1770- Written Approval of Chanes. Grantees must obtain prior written approval tram LEAA'for major project changes. These include (a) changes of sunsiance in project activities, oesigns, or research plans set forth in the approved application; (b) changes in the project director or key professional personnel identified in the approved application; and (c) changes in the approved project budget as specified in the Preceding condition. (12.1 Proiect Income. All interest or other income earned by the grantee with respect to grant funds or as a result of conduct of the grant project (sale of publications, registration fees, service charges on fees, etc.) must be accounted for. Interest on grant funds must be returned to LEAA by check payable to the United States Treasury, and other income should be applied to project purposes or in reduction of project costs; Provided, however, that it the grantee is a unit of government, the grantee shall not be accountable for interest earned On giant funds penning their disbursement or actual sDplocation for project purposes. (13.1 Title to Property. Title to property acquired in whole or in part with grant funds in accordance with approved budgets shall west on the grantee, subject to o.vestment at the option of LEAA (to the extent of LEAA contribution toward the purchase thereof) exercisable only upon notice within 120 days atter the and of the grant period or termination of the grant. Grantees shall exercise due care in the use, maintenance, protection and preservation of such property during the period of project cess. (10.1 Publications. The grantee may publish, at its own expense, ttu results of grant activity without prior review by LEAA provided that any publication (written, visual, or sound) contains an acknowledgement of LEAA grant support. At least 10 copies of any such publication must be furnished to LEAA but only 5 copies of training materials (where used in grant project) need be supplied, except as otherwise reAuested or approver by LEAA. Publication of documents or reports with grant funds beyond quantities required to meet stanoarc report requirements must be provided for in approved project plans or budgets or otherwise approved by LEAA and, for lupe quantity publication, manuscripts must be submitted in advance to LEAA. (15.) Third Party Porticiaetion. No contract or agreement may be entered into by the grantee for execution of project activities or Provision of services to a grant project (other than puscrtass of supplies or stonnard commercial or maintenance services) which is not incorporated in the approved Proposal or approved on advance by LEAA. Any such arrangements shall provide that Inc grantee will retain ultimate control and ressiorsibil.ty tot the grant project and that the contractor or sudgrantee shalt be bound by these grant conditions and any other requitement appl.caPle to the grantee in the conduct of the project (16.) Obligation of Grant Funds. Grant fundi may not, without advance written approval by LEAA, oe obligated prior to the stleci.ve Gate at suasequent to the termination one of Inc grant period. Obligations outstanding as of the termination date shall be Iiquodated within 90 days. Such Obligations must be related to goods or services Provioad and utilized within the grant period. (17.) Fiscal Reoutetions. The fiscal administration of grants shall be subject to such further rules, regulations, and policies. concerning accounting aro recoros, payment of funds, cost allow.absl.tY, submission o1 financial sports, etc.,as may be prescribed by LEAA, including thou sat forth in the LEAA f.nanc.al Gude. OMS Grwlars A•21 and A$7, as well as §15 of FPR (`t CFR §15A00, at. segJ, whare applicable. LEAA FOI;s1 56:112 t2-721 Chap III Page 21 M�fA U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRANT LAIN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS ' ADMINISTRATION PAGE 6 STANDARD GRANT CONDITIONS—)Cont'd) (18.1 Release of Information. Pursuant to Section 521 of the Act, as amended, all records, papers and-other documents kept by recipients of LEAA funds, including State Planning Agencies and thew subgrantaes and contractors. relating to the receipt and disposition of such funds. are required to be made available to the Administration. These records and other documents submitted to LEAA and State Planning Agencies pursuant to other provisions of the Act, including comprehensive - state plans and applications for funds, are required to be made available by LEAA under the terms and conditions of the Federal Freedom of Information Act (5 US.C. 5521. State Planning Agencies must follow applicable LEAA Guidelines on release of information and State Planning Agency procedures designed to facilitate local government participation. - 119.1 Negative Declaration. Applicant hereby declares that no significant environmental impact. as defined by the National Environ- . k mental Policy Act of 1969 and LEAA Guidelines, may result from kmplem enstion of this Pr ogrsm. Father, the applicant hereby declares that implementation of this program will have no adverse effect on properties listed in the National Register of Historic Pieces. Where this Declaration cannot be made, the applicant must attach an Environmental Impact Analysis and proceed in accordance with Oh18 Circular A`95 clearance procedures and appropriate LEAA guidelines. )20.) Assurance of Compliance with Civil Rights t.ewa. The applicant hereby agrees that it will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P. L. 88.352 and all requirements imposed by or pursuant to Regulations of the Department of .justice (28 CFR Part 421 and LEAA Issued pursuant to that title,to the and that no person shalt on the grounds of race, color or nationst origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicant receives Federal financial assistance from the Department: and gives further assurance that it wilt promptly take any measures necessary to effectuate this commitment as mon fully sat forth In -the standard grant conditions set forth above. This assurance shall obligate the applicant for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the Department and is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining the grant for which application is hereby made and the United States shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of this •. assurance t-^'�• . i21.1 Part E Assurances. When Part E funding Is requested, applicant agrees that all Part E assurances. areas of emphasis, and special requirements as set forth in Discretionary Grant Guide pp. 5 & 6 will be complied with. 1). Date: 18, Total Pages in 19. State Planning Agency Certification and Approval Effected. August $r 1975 Application 10 ❑yes ®No 0Not Applicable 20 Sig rareu Official Own of lication) 1 . 1•I - ,� ItoirlTlcsr), C..- :C: o S:Ipervisora . 1 . 1 1 - ' i ' Nwge 23 i LZaa e:w 621/2 t:72) Chap I-I I OCJA N 4500.t U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPLICATION FOR GRAFT A,- LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE DISCRETIONARY FUNDS ADMINISTRATION PAGE 7 21. PROJECT PLAN AND SUPPORTING DATA please stats.clesrly end in datoH. within ten Pa9" H Possible, the aims of the pro/ect; precisely what will be done, who will be Involved and what is "Pected to result- Use the toUo"" major headinpc r, 1, Goa1L R lie Impact and Results - r 111. Methods and Timetable , r. IV. Evaluation P. V. Resources Number subsequent Papas consecutively, Le- APPI"tion Page S. AppikAtion Page 8, etc. See page 7 for further guidance. • I. GOALS Since 1973 the county, its' cities and other public safety agencies have been examining the. status Of- public safety communications throughout the county. In 1973 an LEAA—funded study of police services presented ' .recommendations_regarding the consolidation of communications for public safety agencies in the county- (copy attached) . In 1974 the Contra .Costa County Criminal• Justice Agency, On behalf of the police chiefs and sheriff, contrasted for a study of a Regional Law Enforcement Communications and Dispatch system, the .purpose of which was to review the general recommendations of the 1973 report and to present more specific alternatives for a county--tide communications system - involving all law enforcement agencies in the county (copy attached). Also in 1974 the County Board of Supervisors directed the formation of a committee to review and develop an Emergency Telephone System (911) . A preliminary plan was adopted -in the fall of 1974 which proposed a consoli— dation. of public safety answering points throughout the county in a program to centralize and regionalize the handling of requests for emergency services involving police, fire and emergency medical facilities. In addition, several cities prepared and filed their own individual- 911 . plans._ The Contra Costa County Mayors- Conference has joined together with the Board of Supervisors to pursue a coordinated communications effort. The efforts of these two parallel programs -- Emergency Communications and Dispatch and Emergency Telephone Systems (911) --- are now combined into one coordinated activity through a,special steering committee of the county's Emergency Telephone System Committee, the purpose being to prepare a detailed plan for emergency communications throughout the county, beginning with a 911 system and extending through emergency dispatch and command and control systems. The purpose-of this application is to allow the procuring of a consultant who will present detailed recommendations to the county and the participating cities on specific. communications systems and to prepare a technical design for the implementation of the system which is selected by the jurisdictions in Contra Costa County. _}__ _: x•.2112 u 7:. Chan III -- •nnT -r r%s m^rilst n Artr. C$ ' APPLICATIO14 PAGE g II. IMPACTS AND RESULTS The study proposed in this grant will result in a program for the substantial improvement of emergency communications within the county. • The citizens of Contra Costa County will receive the best, most efficient and most effective emergency communications system available, providing for the most rapid and efficient delivery of public safety services possible. • The fifteen cities and the county will be provided with the most efficient and cost effective public safety communications system available. • The public safety agencies of the county (police, fire, emergency medical organizations) will realize a significant improvement in their ability to respond to requests for service and to ensure the prompt delivery of service to the public. The management of public safety agencies will be improved by the increased availability of management information upon which to base decision making. • The individual police officer, fire fighter or medical personnel will be provided with the most complete information possible about the nature of the emergency incident, including resources available to respond, background information, special conditions of the incident, etc. This will result in an improvement in the individual's ability to deal with the incident and will increase the individual's personal safety and effectiveness. - III. METHODS ARID TIMETABLE The study is projected to extend over approximately 18 months and will consist of two phases. Phase one will review the various alternatives currently-before the cities and the county. This phase is expected to require nine man months, and will build on the previous reports on Police Services and Consolidated Law Enforcement Communications and Dispatch. The study will review procedures to implement a countywide 911 system in conjunction with a consolidation of emergency communications and dispatch. This phase will examine the following alternatives: 1. A single, countywide emergency communications and dispatch center for all public safety agencies, also serving as the county's 911 Public Safety Answering Point. 2. Two regional centers, serving the western portion of the county (five cities) and the central and eastern portions of the county (10 cities). M6 APPLICATION PAGE 9 - I ' 3. Three regional centers, serving West county, Central county (7 cities) and East county (3 cities) . 1�. Four regional centers, two serving West county, one in Central county and one in East -county. 5. A coordinated communications and dispatch system utilizing existing dispatch capabilities, but with a realignment of radio frequencies and equipment to provide. for common, countywide radio nets. - 6. An independent communications and dispatch system utilizing present equipment and frequency configurations and full use of selective routing procedures 'for 911. The review of these alternatives will focus on the institutional structure required to implement the alternatives; the technical requirements associ- ated with each alternative, concentrating on a "sophisticated 911 system" providing for automatic number identification and automatic location identification, and a fully computerized communications and dispatch system providing for digital terminals with two-way alphanumeric capability in operational vehicles, computer-driven- displays, status reports, etc. , and automatic prediction of management reports; the costs associated with the implementation of such systems; and the available locations .and facilities ana _ equipment requirements associated with the alternatives. Upon completion of this review, the consultant will present recommenda- tions to the county and the cities on the most appropriate coniiguration of a regional emergency communications and dispatch system. The various jurisdictions will review the recommendations and will select one for implementation. The consultant will then begin work on the second phase of the project. Phase Two will consist of a technical design phase during which the alter- native which has been selected will be developed into an implementable package. This phase grill involve the preparation of detailed equipment requirements and specifications; a procedure for radio frequency real•:gn- ment, if necessary; identification and develoDment of necessary computer software; development of an appropriate operational procedure, including legal and financial requirements providing for implementation funding as well as operational funding of the recommended alternatives, and a detailed implementation program and work schedule. It is estimated that this phase will require approximately 51 man months of labor. The following timetable will be used for the study: M O N T H S 1 2 3 4 15 16 718 9 01 1213141516 7 8 CONSULTANT SELECTED PHASE I COMPLETED AND RECOM-MENDATIONS PRESE LOCAL AGE14CY REVIEW AND _ ADOPTION OF RECO!L-MND3TION PHASE II TECHNICAL DESIGN FINAL REPORT --f'_ APPLICATION PAGE 10 N, EVALUATION The project is itself an evaluation of the various alternatives available within the county; the final test of evaluation will, of course, be the implementation of the system. Tyro reviews of the work of the consultant will be conducted, the first occurring at the completion of Phase I and; the second occurring at the end of Phase II. In addition, the grantee will require periodic reports of progress from the consultant. V. RESOURCES , The project will be operated by the County of Contra Costa, under the direction of the Office of the County Administrator. It will utilize a policy committee consisting of representatives from the cities, the county and the public safety agencies in the county to oversee; the project. A consultant will be selected through a competitive bidding process to conduct the study. The consultant will be required to possess demonstrated ability in the areas of emergency communications and- dispatch, nd dispatch, computer aided dispatch, emergency telephone systems, and management. In addition to the consultant, the project will draw upon the resources of the Pacific Telephone Company and the Communication Division of the California Department of General Services for support and advice. r - - --------------------- Richmond has employed a team concept since early 1972 for organizing and conducting field patrol operations. (4) Police Communications - Police communications is an important support service for the effective provision of general law enforcement in Contra Costa County. Vital services provided by a police communication system include: Communication between citizens and the police - agency- - Communication among members of the agency in order'to coordinate their activities and exchange information. Communication among police agencies. Communication with other agencies- This section describes thL cost and operation of the present communication system. (4. 1) The current system is characterized by individual agency communications operations . Fourteen police agencies operate in Contra Costa County, and all but two--Clayton and Kensington--have their own -omma nications systems. The systems vary in cost and complexity fron: Brentwood, with one small console (worth about $350) manned • 40 hours a week by a part-time cler ical person, to the Sher iff's Department, with five consoles (north about $30, 000) manned by 24 dispatchers (in total) around the clock- Exhibit 8, following this page, summarizes the capacity, staffing and • operation of each agency's communications system. In summary: - Most agencies utilize"one dispatcher, 24 hours a day (five dispatchers total), to receive all in- coming calls, record complaint information, determine the best way to handle the complaint •and dispatch a unit if required. Major excep-, tions to this are listed below: Onym ' -28- -28- v � , S 15 A E © Q A Q E Q A A A A o •. � x x m 0 E 06 co O A C O O t V S C t Y O N V H Vo W N xca 1-4 0 3 c a0. Ca e v .L n a a. a 0. a a .a a A W V V Q d Q Q Q A Q V Q Q Q o Z Z a x x rt ZO0 a x '' o V -v .. c ayr . V Z U•a �••� O � .v. o ed rs O 00 A W O �. .q. V EE cm V Q a a O •-' f) 0. N u Q E 4.o Q V a Ei 0. Q Q Q Q V Q H 0 Q N •"� 3N .�. es ,v.. C2 �O tU '�► P W N V W 0 p co O 431 C3i lO 4 v W cb O O N h � C7 u L' r4 r4 C• N C O u O. o C CO 40 to co 40 CO G Z O r1 O O ri N 4. . rt O ri � N N � rt N �w Rta.: O as C6 r 0 _ O .! W CA r 4A O co 4' 4 CA C* CO ci - N to CL W N co C A c _ w w ~O C b , V 4) .0 N r4 W r4 rl to N @1 P m N 4A N C- m V N C% C V O 3 ad . zg � 0 o O .2 d O bN N v co O w N W N d' w W m Co — rl Ag r4 �O rt •r4 r1 r4 tT ri V! N -4 NC13 �0 C3. 0 U N CO ■-4 O 1p r4 O N N v rq P N N � � co l' = 7 w ✓ 0 W Z ✓ Y w C O p p 0 N .-4 O N N Co r4 e•1 r4 r4 r4 r4 r4 V w Q E r1 r4 .0 OC =•O zU ' wS co to c a 0 E- '" E E z 4 a. O T „� o .08 8 N v -0 - _. ..-._,..._...- ,.._sins*.- .:�^�ra=c-• +�*=,F.m .•- X w a a a h 3 J-,J _ Jul . z , l - Brenhvood mans its radio 40 hours a week with part-time clerical help. Clayton contracts with the Sheriff's Department. - Concord utilizes two cross-trained tele- phone operators/dispatchers at all times. El Cerrito utilizes two cross-trained - PBX operators/dispatchers on two shifts and one from midnight to 8:00 am. Kensington contracts with the El Cerrito Police Department. _ - Richmond utilizes operators, complaint - • clerks, and dispatchers during the day and complaint clerks and dispatchers after 5.00 pm. - - Walnut Creek utilizes•a PBX operator and. two dispatchers during the day and two dispatchers after 5:00 pm. The maintenance of the hardware and consulta- tion on syLtem design and improvement is pro- vided to half the agencies by the communications division (technical services) of the Sheriff's De- partment and to half by the Delta Communications Company, an authorized service agency for Motor- ola. (Walnut Creek's console is maintained by a private consultant.) In the smaller agencies, dispatchers usually perform a variety of functions in addition to dis- patching. Dispatchers serve as telephone oper- ators, complaint clerks, record clerks and matrons or jailers. More than 100 people are involved in the opera- tion of the County-wide communication system. Almost 83 (801"o) of these people are dispatchers. The other 20 people include supervisors, com- plaint desk personnel acrd clerical support and back-up. -2s- 00174 -29- 00174 (4.2) Annual County-wide costs of maintaining and operating police communications systems exceed 31.4 million Exhibit 9, following this page, summarizes the cost of installing, maintaining and operating the present system. Major conclusions to be drawn from the cost data are sum- marized below: - The total annual operating costs of the County- wide communications system are almost $1. 5 million. Of that total, $1.3 million (85%) is for personnel, $173, 000 (111,`0) is for mainten- ance and depreciation of the equipment, and $56.000 (4016) is for other operating costs. ' Almost every police agency in the County is _ connected io the Bay Area's PN system and the state's CLETS system. Total PIN costs for the County amount Ao almost $30,-000 and include the rental ' of eight telephone lines (88, 400), and twelve IBM 2740 machines ($21, 400). Total CLETS costs for the County amount to almost $26, 000 and include 14 CLETS . machines ($21, OGD, including lease lines) and four APB-receive only machines ($4, 800). Until recently, all departments had APB-receive only machines, but most agencies felt the cost exceeded the benefit • and discontinued the service. The purchase and maintenance of communication hardware amounts to $173, 000 annually, based on 1971 figures. Of that total, equipment de- preciation amounts to $112,000 and maintenance of the equipment $61, 000. -30- ............................. ' C w h - - I. ... .. .. :.'..x µ♦'1i81..y. .z - • C � •t •t .� M •� � r GI M � R Ci � a � X • C p pp pp pp pp pp pe p S O b Gr O o o • O O 4 4 O 8 0 � O pp y w • • M M M p O • V • w w w O ! Op �i, c M O O 4 6 O O • O O N O O O O O • + C��v M wO• O .O• ~ w a M r • �•'w � � A • • � • p w � .. w s • w w t+ ar w • � y M M y O O O O O O pp O O O � vtl O I) W tl •T w O w .i p • w O M � w .f • O � !Mf j yxi yi w •� •+ H A A aO tiY �- O - �v M • •• N • N M M M w y w � O O s w M w • • o w p w �. • a o n w :� � a ve # w .� w s w .• .. w a M .Mi � .. • • ati • . 't y tl y ��."�. w w a • v �• w •- o • �u o a � "� s b s x-s a o s o wq o �• O a o M 8 4 Ew N o o .. • • •• w -• .• r M M N .w• � '3 � s. �. g 9 E�v � • � � • s � r � S � .� � � w w � � O � v `a Z� 'a �• M ri •' ; g ZR 9 4 ti A F e tr` • • �2 .. O i p • • 06= M s Y •� � Y � � . g e � g a < Jt u s G :[ .�' .c L L � Z •� 3 w w t • t Z.. N .11 • +► e • of ki i� M - • Q o� ." g tg . � � s i w •� w y- � •e- a i w :r o i i • 8 O a.• tw o O •� o •• w _ e • o • ' Y • w .r .t r .: e d e .r d E3 go $ 96 is O i w i •o` i w e i i r i r � e L• • • • 3 • p 88� • 6 Y c • .. s V i - • w • o Z A M �F 9 •'S•. B - •� •- s O O O O .a �C M • • • • » • • • • • • M • M • N _ .• w w w w i � o � •< Y E- _ a r • n • • i o i• •i i o o •». 8. v w w w w .� w w w• w w r i `o •i w w ..t w •� w w w A .. .j �!� ` o e • s a s s ► a o Y » D 523 M +o• - � t •- o ♦ a o o e •- - - -' - � e f rC. S • o � • o e i i • _ - • M • d .i yy� • c am w •• N � � 6 O c 0 C • tl O O O • N O O O w w N M w � �9 4 a Y _ O w � s�••. Eu e ♦ • • ,8 O •{,i s � r o _ .• o e ♦ ♦ ♦ • • w i .a• ♦ .Z � o �r S - g Y G V yrs • � iCa s ti S s O � i i � M s C � yy {� t � L � � I r � : •.• N C �� Q < L u V G Y � .�a i L L Z •2 2 w E{ H L w N 00177 Both the Sheriff's communication division _ (technical services) and Delta Communication, a private. firm. utilize a fixed fee contract to charge for maintenance service. Although the cost of certain maintenance activities is difficult to compare. it appears that both agencies charge comparable fees for their service. - The wide variations in the kinds and capacities of consoles used by various ' police agencies make a maintenance cost comparison difficult. Delta's annual maintenance charge per base station is substantially less ($232 • to $433) than the Sheriff's communication division's charge. However, all of its base stations are local and readily acces- ' sible to maintenance crews. About hall of the 28 base stations maintained by the Sher! f's communication division are re- motely located on mountain tops. Th•� cost of maintaining a mountain top base station is about 71°16 higher than the cost of maintaining a local station. The Sheriff's communication division's annual maintenance charge is about $84 . per mobile.unit compared to $85 per unit • by Delta. ' • - Delta's annual maintenance charge per portable unit is about $66, compared to $50 for the Sheriff's communication div- ision. (5) Records and Information An important tool in late enforcement, as in any government or private business, is its records and record maintenance. Re- cords are most valuable when they are: -31- O(Os Although it is hard to document, on-site observations and some review of incident reports indicate that: Municipal police departments are required to pro- vide substantial patrol coverage to neighboring unincorporated areas because of the "spill over" effect these pockets have on their own areas (e.g. NorthRichmond, El Pueblo, West Pittsburg). By informally increasing their patrol beats to in- clude parts of the adjacent unincorporated 'areas, municipal police-departments reduce their ability to provide patrol coverage and quickly respond to ' calls for service in their own areas. The informal agreements made by municipal police depart- ments to respond to emergency situations in the unincor- porated areas result in further subsidizing County residents who contribute nothing to the support of a city police de- partment. • 2, THE CURRENT APPROACH TO ORGANIZING POLICE SERVICES. IN THE COUNTY RESULTS IN UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EFFORT IN SOME KEY SUPPORT SERVICES The following sections highlight the problems in the County's ap- proach to providing police commu:scations, booking and temporary de- tention of prisoners pending arraignment. (1) Operations of Individual Agency'Communication Systems Results in Significant Duplication of Personnel and Equipment Resources The present decentralized communication system results in the duplication of manpower and equipment and the increased costs- associated osts-associated with such duplications. (1. 1) The decentralized network of individual systems makes it difficult to balance staffing with workload Exhibit 15, following this page, shows the utilization factor of each police agency's communication personnel. The utilization factor does not include an adjustment for the time spent by dispatchers in the medium-sized and smaller agencies - - . 00179 • e = w o A w n o s •o D o r o e• v • Y w q � A A A M A r Y w � M f► �� • w w a N r O o r O O • • • • w A d A w X 00 � £u _ o sgX$ � a w o •i i w a '� ?. o r a � � o � e Fo 3E Md � w r •e• s e e •A- � o e r w o a a � A . � _ r • o a u a N o A o 0 8 0 « o � F e 's w e • e i w M a •'T "' d .• A • « O A O N AdEA • r • O • O A • b A O A F � wZ .�. = w S o S' e i R a 7j i e n w Xi 8 0 oo cr « e a i`• .�•. n a o N a A r • O O N N a i o �• n n n a s e E.•`t E E a • o w « ♦♦ pp N p .+ N • • • �� O � w Y O w w S M r p �•� A � P � O • V O d q O .! O w d M a M P q d !+ O 1 M N r • M M w N A A N = « � ' E t'� 4 O •� N O `Ol O O w � p N • O A iI q O . a E - E E�• p d « O r N ff N A M w A N ti V C r •�►• r O •O • N N r N N O Ne NO E •V• �' • w A r N � �_ A r w 4 A O S O O 1C 2:t A A e w � 7j • ' • s • w r r A • A •t ♦ t - � � r r o • r N : o A o • a i► a � eo- � a ' �i .i . . w . • . .� w a M E L i w n S o a o T a 8 a ft w' or N� � A -f N • • O • • b O • A M A 8 A s .: aaxx � ssasaa � d �•; :: ' V r w A A • • N A S p N N S A Q ti d ` O A r O N O • 00 a w w A � A A A fl e N ��T=TE � • A • • • 4 z w •o w O � Z' � S O t Q~ -'• d N e A b M A S r A r � d O r A V r M w • w • A q , 6 t « • . M S " Y t y w M Z i + M Nis SE `O J « w i a s w w .�. •� N i o �. w- q; w d v 4 pa At r '- . • Y � y O V 3, l`1 • - cY• "sani S O {O�. , z 3 t�L a Y C C C a' Lei �- 1� N \ - �VAOU as record clerks and secretaries.. However, it does include taking complaints as well as dispatching and these two acti- vities make up the majority of the dispatchers' workload. The other assumptions used in this analysis and used throughout this section are summarized in Appendix C at the end of the report. Major conclusions to be drawn from the analysis include the following: The utilization of communications personnel consid= ers both police related activities and activities generated by general government and other emer- gency calls directed to the police department after 5:00 pm and on weekends. Each police agency in the County under- utilizes its communications personnel. The utilization factor ranges from a low of 16% in Antioch to a high of 7916 in Richmond. On the average, communications personnel oiler- ate at a utilization factor of 3776. The main reason for the under-utilization is the decentralization of the communication sys- tem. In order to provide police communication 24 hour's a day, it requires at least five dis- patchers. Based on the complaint and dispatch- ing worklo,-d, only the Sheriff's Department and Richmond require as many as five full-time dispatchers. Other areas requiring the duplication of personnel include: Supervising personnel Training personnel Operating PIN, CLETS and APB-receive only machines (1.2) Dentralized communications operations result in higher operating and maintenance costs In addition to the duplication of manpower and the costs associated with that duplication, equipment purchase and maintenance costs are also higher because of the decentral- ized communications system. For example: 00181 . -61- l..a.0 l•Jltiaaaua_ UUAUJL -61- y` Separate purchasing of equipment (mobile units particularly) is more expensive than centralized purchasing because individual agencies cannot generally take advantage of quantity discounts. Currently, police agencies pay an average of • $1, 000 for a mobile unit. However, the Sheriff's • Department, through a quantity discount, is able to purchase comparable mobile units for $800 each. This 2016 savings would amount to a total dollar savings of $75, 600 (based on 378 mobile units in use throughout the County). The maintenance of'equipment is more costly for a number of reasons: There is more equipment to maintain. The kind of equipment used is not Stan- dardized. This means parts cannot be bought in quantity and more skill.is re- •quired by the technicians to service dif- ferent ki-ids of equipment. Equipment is spread throughout the County--consoles, base stations, etc-- requiring travel by maintenance personnel_. (2) Individual Agency Operation of Communication Systems Affects Communication-Service Levels In addition to the high cost resulting from the duplication of manpower and equipment, the present decentralized system is also characterized by a lower level of service than should be expected. • (2. 1) The ability and experience of police communications personnel vary widely among police agencies in the County • One of the major problems with a decentralized sys- tem is that each agency requires at least five radio dispatch- ers for 24-hour coverage whether the workload requires it or not. The result is that all of the agencies have dispatchers with idle time at the same time. -62- V VV tw ' I One solution to the problem described above is to • utilize dispatchers for other purposes. The problem with this solution is that higher salaries must be paid for multi- skilled people who generally provide a lower level of ser- vice in each of the areas than a specialist could provide in one specific area. The level of service in police communications ranges from very adequate in some of the-larger departments to very inadequate in some of the smaller departments. It is a hardship for many of the smaller departments to have the five radio dispatchers necessary to give 24-hour coverage. Some of the radio dispatchers are police cadets, secretar- ' - les or record clerks. Although in routine situations this level of expertise is adequate, in a high-tension emergency situation, the need for well'trained dispatchers is strongly felt. ' (2.2) The current system is characterized by uneven. fre- quency utilization and an inability, in most cases, for mobile units of different agencies to corrnmur..cate Individual police agencies are assigned frequencies by the F.C.C. In Contra Costa County. most agencies currently operate on the VHF frequency 155.310. Exceptions to this include Richmond and Pittsburg who operate UHF systems and are each assigned a 460 frequency, and the Sheriff's Department which is assigned two VHF frequencies, 155. 19 and 155. 64. El Cerrito is in the process of switching to a UHF system and coordinating its-communication system with Richmond. Under the present system, inequities exist in the util- ization of the frequencies assigned to police agencies in.the _ County. Certain channels (particularly city police channels) are over-utiliied with heavy radio traffic during peak activity • hours, while other channels are under-utilized. A central - communications system would make it possible to Epread the radio traffic more evenly across the total number of assigned frequencies. UU18.3 �4T a 1 Y Another problem related to the utilization and assign- ment of frequencies is the incompatibility of one agency's system with other systems throughout the County. The pre- sent system, in most cases, does not allow mobile units from one agency to communicate with mobile units from another agency. This situation is at least inconvenient and can be unsafe during emergency situations involving-more than one police agency. - (3) Individual Agency Operation of Communication Systems Offers Some Advantages Although this section has dealt primarily with the - problems of the present system, it should be noted that a decen- tralized system does provide the following advantages: It physically places the dispatching personnel in or near the area for which they are responsible. It keeps personnel under the supervision of the de partment or agency they serve. - It enables the system to avoid catastrophic failure of the dispatching system which might be caused by _ destruction of a central location by fire, flood or other disaster. It should also be noted that for departments below a certain size, contribution of personnel or funds to a central dispatching system may not be economical. Based'on recent studies, this critical size has been found to be when the population served is less than 20, 000 (this would involve four of the communities in ' Contra Costa County). Central dispatching generally reduces the total number of dispatchers required, but may not reduce the total number of personnel required by small departments belonging to the network. A dispatcher in such departments may also be record clerk, receptionist and secretary. Supplying dispatchers or funds to•a central system may then actually be an addition to the budget and not a reduction. However, even for small departments, the improvement in communication effectiveness and the benefits of access to data terminals may outweigh the economic factors re- lated to personnel. 00184 i -64- the present system. However, only five of the police agencies actually save money with the proposed system. The other nine agencies, based on the charge-back method described in the previous section, would be required to pay additional costs ranging from $4, 000 to almost $70, 000. Although other measurable benefits (including increased patrol coverage and cost avoidance related to meeting minimum jail standards) would accrue, the additional out-of-pocket expense may re- sult in opposition to the proposed system. An alternative approach might therefore be to finance the proposed system . through an increase in the tax rate. The method of deter- mining the amount of increase required is summarized - below: The cost of the proposed system is $1. 1 million. The Sheriff's Department's current cost of booking, handling and transporting prisoners pending arraignment is $353, 000. Therefore, an additional $700, 000 is required to finance the proposed system. With a total County assessed valuation of al- 'most $1. 9 billion, an increase in the tax rate of three to four cents would generate enough revenue to finance the proposed system. ($700, 000 ; $19, 000, 000 = . 0368) 2: CONSOLIDATE COMMUNICATIONS OPERATIONS ON A REGIONAL OR COUNTY-WIDE BASIS As described in Chapter IV, the decentralized communications system in the County results in substantial duplication of manpower and equipment. Other problems with the present system include: An inability in most cities to balance staffing with work- load, resulting in under-utilization of communications personnel. s Otj18� -lls- i 1 an Inexperienced and under-trained radio dispatchers, particularly in the smaller agencies. Uneven frequency utilization and incompatibility among police mobile units. This section describes two alternatives to providing communica- tions to County police agencies. The alternatives are designed to meet the general police service objectives outlined in Chapter H and to reduce or eliminate the problems associated with the present system. Specifi- cally, the communications system should: Provide for effective channels of communication within and among police agencies. Avoid unnecessary service overlaps or duplications among police service agencies. Increase cooperation and working relationships among police agencies in the County. Base staffing levels on measurable workload requirements. Increase the use of technology as it applies to law en- forcement. Increase or better utilize the space available for police service agencies. ` Expand the practice of consolidated purchasing without impairing local service effectiveness or control. • Increase the standardization of equipment used by police agencies. Maximize the use of financial resources available for law enforcement. - 001,86_ - u' i In addition, the alternatives describe_ d in this section are designed to: Organize the communications system to balance staffing and workload. To the extent possible, realize economies of scale in equipment purchase and maintenance. Enable police agencies to readily communicate with each other. Maintain local agency identity in police contact with the public. Provide all police agencies and cities communication support by well-trained, experienced personnel. Establish a system which would support the implementation of "911. " Provide for meeting other local government communica- tions needs such as emergency medical, public works, animal control, etc. The two alternatives described and evaluated below both represent a centralization of the current system. The first alternative is based on the concept of one central system for the entire County. The second alternative is based on the concept of two regional communications systems--one to serve the west County areas and one to serve the central and east County areas. Both alternatives suggest better coordination in the purchase and maintenance of equipment, the utilization of frequencies and the use of personnel. A number of assumptions have been made and standards employed in designing two alternative communications systems. A detailed des- cription of the assumptions and standards is presented in Appendix B; following the text of this report. 00197 . -118- (1) County-Wide Communications Workload Bust Be Considered in Developing alternative Approaches to Providing Police Communications Exhibit 27, following this page, shows the police com- munications workload in 1971 for each police agency in the County. Workload estimates are based on the assumptions and standards outlined in Appendix C. Major conclusions to be drawn from the exhibit include the following: ,. The estimated number of total citizen calls includes only incoming calls directly related to police acti- vities. It does not include the general government calls received by police departments after city and County switchboards close at 5:00 pm and on week- -ends.. Of the total citizen calls received by an agency, about 53% result in the dispatch of a mobile unit. Of the 47% handled without the dispatch of a mobile unit: ' - 16% can be handled directly by the telephone operator. - - 15% require the assistance of a complaint clerk or desk officer. 11% are referred to investigative personnel. , 5% are referred to other agencies. In the medium-sized and smaller agencies, the person answering the phone initially serves as telephone operator and complaint clerk, as well _ as radio dispatcher. Exhibit 28, following Exhibit 27, shows the manhours re- quired in 1971 for each police agency to handle its communications workload. -In summary: on- -119- EXHIBIT. 27 Contra Cosa County EMMA'TES OF POLICE COMMUNICATIONS WORKLOAD BY AGENCY BASED ON 1971 DATA Police Related Non-Police• Police Calls Handled without Police Related Related Related Dispatching a Mobile Unit Calls Requiring the Citizen Citizen Telephone Complaint investigative Outside Dispatch of Police A ,encDesk Unit Agency a Mobile Unit Antioch 20,144 15.917 2.547 2,387 1.151 796 804 96 B=tV=d 3.941 2.547 408 382 280 127 1.350 Clayton 2,627 1.518 243 228 167 76 804 Concord 10,066 55.757 8.921 8.364 6,133 2.788 29,551 El Cerrito 45.105 36.236 5.798 5.435 3.986 1.812 19,205 Kensington 6.131 5.085 814 763 559 254 2.695 Lafa}•ette 10.072 8.466 1.355 1.270 931 423 4,487 M ninez 26.275 21.442 3.431 3.216 2,359 1,072 11.364 Piable 22.772 17.812 2.850 2.672 1.959 891 9.440 Pittsburg 16.203 13.477 2.156 2.022 1.492 674 7.143 Pleasant Hill 22.772 18.182 2.909 .2.727 2.000 909 9.637 Richmond 129.186 102.582 16.413 15.387 12.284 5.129 54.369 San Pablo 33,719 27.353 4.376 4.103 3.009 1.363 14.497 Walnut Creek 28.902 22.608 3.617 3.391 2.487 1.130 11,983 Sheriff's Dept. 246.898 79.026 12.644 12.654 8.693 3.951 42,884 TOTAL 684.813 428.006 68.482 64.201 47.080 21.400 226.845 UG i . z V 04' _ 1 a C 9 x A r AAA s � w A iRs • ,. �� • i M r jq V • S � A � a.. i r O � • � �` e e V • r • A P , • A M r_ S . y, ,p„ O • A A JC R • � A : • � N t g Y d w • � �t i � K � . g • + 5 A d ~ w A • M O - sc p A A r A UC A o� o P • • r r N � A •r p p lot w • O A « Nas • p M P �p � r w • .d �' • w o r A eA• � n4 w • '� d A - w p • o V .. A A l 1 r O • • "'� �' • w is A p e A A( A » A A N A - r 51 A t e a •y �, r • P p P � w 8 e Si X „ a a A r • D e + A • � o e r r �� o • • •,. Y w • • A M � r O • A r E p r O, • A � A S r • �t " o a c • � A �„ ex% a � � �� : v• �f D SS .Z $ 4 a 2 T A O @ 6 w r a ,a � e c pE oo E � r$ ' 'h' c 'r�V wL'•� •�.W = +=�G w2 ~' o� 'v r - In 1971, police agencies handled more than 428, 000 police related citizen requests for service. The police related citizen requests required almost 11.000 manhours to answer, record relevant infor- mation and refer to an appropriate individual or agency. i ! In addition, police agencies handled 684, 813 non- police related citizen calls, requiring 14, 504 man hours. Although the workload generated by such requests was substantially less than workload generated by police related complaints, it still required + personnel to answer phones, record information and refer the request to an agency or individual for servicing. Examples of the kinds of non-police related service requests include: • - . Emergency medical Sewer and street malfunctions Flooding and other disasters - General government information . Animal control �-- - Rescue More than half of the police related citizen requests • resulted in the dispatch of an officer. Each incident requiring the dispatch of an officer (call for service) took an average of five radio transmissions to com- plete. The CFS related radio transmissions totalled j almost 1.2 million for all County police agencies t in 1971. { An estimated 4. 3 million additional messages were transmitted over the radio in 1971 to handle adminis- trative and other non-CFS related activities. An estimated 30,246 manhours were spent by police dispatchers in transmitting radio messages. • An estimated total of almost 45. 000 manhours was spent in 1971 by communication personnel throughout the County in receiving and handling citizen com- plaints. ORM -120- (2) Consolidating All Communications Activities into a Single Unit Supporting All County Law Enforcement Agencies Offers the Greatest Cost Savings The major elements of a central communication system to support all County police agencies can be summarized as follows: All communication functions would be centralized in one facility to serve all 14 police agencies in the County. Each community would have two telephone numbers to use in contacting the police: One number, referred to as the "police infor- mation number, " would connect the caller directly to the individual police agency. The other number, referred to as the "police emergency number, " (eventually to be 911 state-wide), would connect the caller directly to the central communications center. All calls received by the communications center would be handled initially by a complaint officer. He would answer the call, record the relevant information, determine how best to handle the call, and refer the call to the appropriate person or agency. The options of the complaint officer are to: Handle the call personally Refer the caller to another, more appro- priate division or agency Refer the call to a supervisor for additional assistance Refer the call to a radio dispatcher if a mobile unit is required to respond • 1/O�a�j� -12I- Radio dispatchers would work closely with com- plaint officers and have primary responsibility for assigning and coordinating the activities of the mobile units on duty. For operating purposes, the County would be divided into two sections (east-central and west) and dispatchers assigned to handle specific geographic areas. All of the County's assigned radio frequencies would be retained and radio workload equally distributed among the frequencies. Each police agency would retain its present hard- ware to be used as a back-up system in case of.a failure in telephone lines or the County's radio system. Each agency would utilize existing mobile and portable units and individual systems would be • made compatible through the use of relay systems installed in base stations throughout the County. Eventually, all equipment would be standardized • (in terms of brand) to help reduce purchase and maintenance costs. The purchase and maintenance of all equipment would be performed by one agency in order to reduce costs and increase service levels. (2. 1) The central communication center should be operated • as a separate County division, independent of any police agency An important element in the design of a centralized communication system is the need for the operating agency to be equally responsive to all its users. This criteria can most easily be met by organizationally separating the com- munication unit from any one police agency. In addition to being equally responsive to all police - agencies in the County, a separate County unit can more easily coordinate police communication requirements with other general government and emergency communication needs. -122- - 00193 -122- 4v14L J Exhibit 29, following this page. presents a graphic description of the proposed organization and staffing of a central communication unit. Specific staffing requirements are explained in more detail in the next section. Highlights of the organization structure are summarized below: The communications division would be headed ' by a director reporting directly to the County Administrator. The division would be divided into an operating - unit and a technical services unit: The cost of the operating unit would be divided among the user agencies as explained later in this chapter. The technical services unit would mon- itor the system design and purchase and maintain all communications equipment. Operating expenses and overhead would be covered in the fixed fee charged for maintenance service. _ The assistant director on the operations side would be a sworn police lieutenant. The assistant director on the technical services side would be equivalent to the present position of supervisory communications technician in the Sheriff's communications division. . (2.2) The central communications unit should be staffed to handle all police related requests for service, as well as other general government and emergency communi- cations needs presently met by County police agencies Although the major communication workload is related to law enforcement, other city and County communication needs presently met by police agencies must be considered in staffing a County-wide center. Exhibit 30, following Exhibit 29. shows the number and kind of personnel re- quired to staff the operations unit. Highlights of the staffing requirements can be summarized as follows: _00191- -123- - r a 7 Y N • . �r V �- F o N oA p p v �. Q 4 0j r► ii ra �Q. V. 4 'r 4 C. r� O a Y r V ¢ 4 r_ r+ V N r tom, A' •' r o0oV_a. d N r G V M & � v EXHIBIT 30 Contra Costa County NUMBER AND KIND OF STAFF REQUIRED TO OPERATE A CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS ULSIT Related Estimated Annual Add Peak Add Turnover Personnel Annual Man,Hours Requited Factor (Total Factor (Total Required (Total Position Workload To Handle Workload Man Hours X L3) Man Hours X 1 2) Man Hours=192C Administrative 3.840 3.840 3.840 - 2 Director Administer overall. 1.920 1,920 1.920 1 operation Assistant Administer day to 1.920 1.92a 1.920 1 w ' Director day operation Operations Supervisory 9.600 9.600 � 11.520 6 Senior Radio Supervise complaint $. Dispatchers and radio personnel 9.600 9,600 " 21,520 6 OpMting 48.033 62.443 74.932 • 42 , Complaint 459.681 police 11.492 14.940 .17.928 10 Cletk related calls 730.895 other calls 4.060 5.278 6.334 4 . "Radio 5.847.157 radio 32.481 . 42.225 50,670 27 Dispatcher transmissions TOTAL- ALL PERSONNEL 61.473 15.883 90,292 49 001M _ ern ift • 001 v - Staffing levels are based on a 7.4% projected annual increase in communications workload. The workload consists of-receiving and res- ponding to all "routine emergency" calls, dis- patching and coordinating the movement of all - mobile units, and supervising and administering all communications operations. The basic assumptions and standards used in this analysis are summarized in detail in Ap- pendix D, following the text of this report. Major assumptions related to Exhibit 30 include the following: - •- To handle peak and emergency staffing, requirements, the number of operating • personnel-should be sufficient to handle ' 1.3 times the number of actual calls re- ceived and messages transmitted. Based on available data, staffing levels should take into account a turnover fac- tor of 20% annually. One person works an average of 1, 920 hours per year. Based on a projected annual workload of about 1.2 million citizen calls and 5.8 million radio transmissions, 41 complaint clerks and radio dispatchers would be needed to staff a central facility. An additional eight administrative and supervisory personnel would also be required. The staffing described in this section includes only operating personnel. Additional technical and maintenance personnel would include: - One assistant director (technical) - Seven communications technicians - One radio equipment aide - One clerical -124- 0"1:9`7 WO Total personnel costs of the proposed central com- munications division would amount to about $753, 000 annually. A break-down of personnel costs by position is summarized in Exhibit 31, following this page. (2.3) The equipment cost of a central communications system • would include-the initial converting and upgrading of the present system as well as the annual depreciation and maintenance of the new system Exhibit 32, following Exhibit 31, summarizes the major equipment costs of a central communications unit. Costs include both the initial converting and upgrading of the present system and the estimated annual maintenance and depreciation cost of the new system. The total cost of con- verting and upgrading the present system is $171, 950. The cost elements of that total include: Installing two microwave lines at a cost of $30, 000 each to provide adequate and upgraded coverage to all County areas--$60; 000 Installing four additional base stations (at a cost of $7, 600 each), one in Richmond and one each on Kreger, Rocky Ridge and Crockett Peaks--$30, 400 Installing ten multiplex channels to allow com- munication among all mobile units--$24, 000 Installing two additional consoles (at a cost of $20, 000 each) to handle increased radio traffic--$40, 000 Converting the mobile units of all police agencies, except Pittsburg, Richmond, Con- cord and the Sheriff's Department.'(at a cost - of $150 each) to provide full radio utilization --$17, 550 W�� -125- MIBIT 31 , Contra Costa Conary .~, ,;, M,Ts BY post-noN FOR EXHIBIT 31 . Contra Costa County i PERSONNEL COSTS BY POSITION FOR A CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION Annual Salary and Number of Total Annual lbsition Tide FYinge Benefit Per Person Positions Petsonnet Cost Communications Director $26.220 1 $26.220 Operations Assistant Dizector 22,110 1 22,110 (sworn lieutenant) - Senior Radio Dispatcher 12.930 6 77.580 Radio Dispatcher 11.745 27 _ 317,115 Complaint Clerk 11.745 14 164.430 SOB TOTAL - 48.5 $594.345 Technical Assistant Director 17.730 1 27.730 (non-sworn) Oommunicationt Technician 15.330 7 - - 107.310 Radio Equipment Aide 12.030 1 22,030 Clerical 8,160 1 8.164 SUBTOTAL 10.5 $158.340 TOTAL 59 $752.685 . ........ .. .A_�..'ase- .f EXHIBIT 32. ' - Contra Costa County • MAJOR EQUIPMENT COSTS OF A CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY MAJOR CONVERTING AND UPGRADING COSTS Equipment Number of Unit Total Capital Requirement • Units Cost Investmenr Microwave lines from Bald Peak ' to Richmond, and from Kreger Ptak to Pittsburg 2 _ 30.000 60.000 Additional base stations :4 7.600 30.400 Additional multiplex channels 10 - 2.400 24,006 Additional consoles 2 ` '_20.000 40,000 Conversion of mobile units -117 150 17,556 TOTAL COST OF CONVERTING AND ' - UPGRADING EQUIPMENT S171.950 ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS Annual Depre- Annual MNainten- Total Annual Type of Equipment elation Costs ante Cosa Cost Radio Consoles (7 consoles) 8.750 1.960 10,710 Base Stations (50 base stations) 11.500 17.750 29,250 -Mobile Units (378 units) 28.350 32.130 60,480 Portable Units (149 units) 23.840 - 8.500 , 32.340 Microwave Lines (7 lines) 14.000 5.040 19,040 A lultiplex Channels (25 channels) 4.000 3.600 7.600 PIN Machines (4 lease) - - 8.388 CLETS Machines (5 lease) - - 7,500 APB-teceive only machines(1 lease) - - 1.200 Public phone lines (49 lease lines) - - 53.236 Private phone lines to each Police - - 15.768 Agency(13 lease lines) - 90.440 68.980 TOTAL ANNUAL EOUIP161ENT COSTS $145,512 1 - • 00200 t •F The estimated annual equipment depreciation cost would total $90. 440 for the central communication facility. Included in that total are: Seven consoles with an initial capital invest- ment of $70, 000, annualized over eight years with no trade-in value--$8, 750/year 50 base stations (both remote and local) with an initial capital investment of $120, 000, annualized over ten years with a trade-in value of $100 each--$11, 500/year 378 mobile unit$ with an initial capital invest- ment of $302, 400 ($800 each with a quantity discount), annualized over ten years with a trade-in value of $50 each--$28, 350/year 149 portable units with an initial capital in- vestment of $119, 200 ($800 each with a quan- tity discount). annualized over five yeas s with no trade-in value--$23. 840/year Seven microwave lines with an initial capital investment of $210, 000, annualized over fif- teen years--$14,000/year • 25 multiplex channels (50 terminal ends) with an initial capital investment of $60, 000, annual_ ized over fifteen years--$4, 000/yea7r The cost of maintaining all equipment would total $68, 980 annually, plus an additional $86, 092 to lease linking phone lines. Details of the annual maintenance and lease costs are summarized below: Seven consoles maintained at an average cost of$280 per console--$1, 960/year 50 base stations maintained at an average cost of $355 per base station--$19, 950/year 378 mobile units maintained at an average cost of $85 per unit--$32, 130/year -126- 110 i it 149 portable units.maintained at an average cost of $57 per unit--$8, 500/year (rounded from $8,493) Seven microwave lines maintained at an aver- age cost of $30 per month per terminal end (14 terminal ends)--$5, 040/year 25 multiplex channels maintained at an average cost of $6 per month per terminal end (50 terminal-ends)--$3, 600/year Four PIN machines and one lease line at a total annual cost of $8, 388 Five CLETS machines and one lease line at' • a total annual cost of $7, 500 Once APB-receive only machine at a total annual cost of $1,200 49 additional public phone lines from indivi- dual cities to the central facility. 986 miles of line at $4. 50 per mile per month--$53, 236. • Eventually the microwave lines should be used to replace the phone lines. Direct phone lines from the central facility to each police department. 292 miles of line at $4.50 per mile per month--$15,768[year (2.4) The establishment of a central communications unit has certain disadvantages The disadvantages of a central communications unit can be summarized as follows: A central facility would appear to allow the number of operating staff to be reduced from 83 to 49 (34 positions). However, because of the varied duties performed by many of the communications personnel at each agency, a number of positions would still require staffing by local agencies. -127- 00202 Dispatching personnel would probably not be as familiar at first with the area for which they are responsible. Local agencies would no longer have direct supervisory control over communications per- sonnel. Certain of the smaller communities will be re- quired to pay more for their dispatching than • they presently do. (Brentwood, Clayton and Kensington would pay from $3, 800 to $5, 500 - more for their share of the cost of a central facility.) . (2. 5) The cost of maintaining and operating a central commun- ications facility should be shared by all participating agencies on the basis of their use of the service The method of charging individual police agencies for their use of a central communications center is summarized below: Under the present law, a contract arrangement • between the County and each of the participating municipalities appears to be the soundest method of sharing the cost of a central communications facility. Legal authority for such an arrange- ment is contained in Section 55632 of the Govern- ment Code. First year charges should be based on the esti- mated 1972 call for service volume for each agency. Exhibit 33, following this page, shows how the first year's cost of operation would be divided among the participating agen- cies. Major conclusions are summarized - below. The total cost of operating and maintain- ing a central communications facility is • projected to be just over $900, 000. This compares to the present cost County-wide • of almost $1. 5 million. h -128- O203' Q 8 M p C ►^ A N h zz + O h .w Z Z Y Z O tl O< M 16 j - p � n .- • a S *. • • a h •i w • r • p U r � O Y; •. 1� � 'r f't .i r P r S • o » _t .»i r p S . . . Ti'i .o• .w a i n � o ♦ > f/ d A .i M .i q ti � M � n + q O O O O • O O w O O b O ♦! + i ri e--• � a � M i r .+. ti M w o� •� � � .: •s i s • e i r NN� O q h N • - r w ♦ M M b w M » • It - • q r • N e •r -q` w p-, r .� - • r• w • •Of � w A Z Z ♦ F O O Z » Z� . Y h V a r • � Z � f Y N w A ♦ O � Q • L w a x .-. � n « a e s-• n � 0 4 n rs o � � e 8 � � M • • » M M » A A A M o � X • i O w w h w .• ! O • • w O • w w A �� C V r . • �0 �L S " � A M a ♦ w w h w • w w f ♦� O O + � rL D tl `• • 3 y Y Z A + • a O Z a Z d q ♦ . � � 4 O • = G Z Y Y _ •9. r $ C Y • r C .Y. Y C 4 I 3. 00 , All police agencies--except Brentwood, • Clayton and Kensington--would exper- ience cost savings ranging from about $9, 000 annually by El Cerrito (110/6 of • present costs) to more than $200, 000 anniially by the Sheriff's Department (58% of present costs). In subsequent years, the formula for dividing the cost of operating the central unit should be refined and based on actual annual.usage. (3) Establishing Two Regional Communications Centers Offers Cost Reduction Opportunities While Recognizing Certain : Regional Differences Between the West and Central/East County Areas ' Consolidating communications activities into two regional 'centers has many of the same advantages offered by one central facility. It also recognizes some basic differences in the crime characteristics and police activities in the west County and central/ east County areas, as well as the natural geographic division of* the County. Major elements of two regional centers are summar- ized below: The communications functions of all County police agencies will be provided by two regional centers as follows: Richmond location . . El Cerrito . . Kensington .. Pinole .. Richmond .. San Pablo .. Sheriff's Department. (Area 1)- -129 002% - -129- WAD, Martinez location . • .. Clayton Concord . . Lafayette .. Martinez .. Pleasant Hill .: Walnut Creek . . Antioch Brentwood .. Pittsburg Sheriff's Department(Areas II, III, IV) Each community would utilize two phone numbers to contact the police--a"'police information" number and a "police emergency" number. Operating procedures in each regional center would be the same as those outlined for one central facility. All radio frequencies would be retained, but re- assigned for better utilization. Each police agency would retain its hardware as a • back-up system. The purchase and maintenance of all equipment would eventually be performed by the technical services division of the Martinez facility. (3. 1) One regional center should be operated by ad indepen-- dent County agency (lartinez) and the other by the Richmond Police Department (Richmond) Administration of the two regional communications centers should be provided as follows: The Martinez facility should become a separ- ate County division headed by a director re- porting to the County Administrator. The division should be divided into an operations unit and a technical services unit. W as -130.- , I 7X" . . The Richmond facility should be operated by the Richmond Police Department. It should be essentially an operating unit-with system consulting and maintenance services provided Y by the technical services unit of the County agency located in Martinez. (3.2) Regional centers should be staffed to handle all police related requests for service, as well as other general government and emergency communication needs pre- sently met by County police agencies Exhibit 34, following this page, summarizes the number and kind of personnel required to staff the operations • . units of each regional facility. Staffing levels are based on the assumptions and standards outlined in Appendix D. In • contrast to the staffing of a central facility: The same number of complaint clerks and dispatchers (41) would be required to staff the two regional centers, but 15, instead of 8, administrative and supervisory personnel would be required. Total operating personnel for both regional facilities would be 56, compared to 49 oper- ating personnel at a central facility. Personnel costs for each regional center are outlined in Exhibit 35, following Exhibit 34. (3.3) The equipment costs of two regional centers would be somewhat loe-er than equipment costs of one central facility Exhibit 36, following Exhibit 35, outlines the major costs involved in converting and upgrading the present sys- tem. It also shows the depreciation cost, as well as the cost of maintaining the equipment. In summary: Almost $175, 000 would be required to convert and upgrade the present system. 00207 -131- ., ,�, x O U x • 5 C a - G V cli cot r4 ey tD 4 N id N' P� rt t� NI r rt NI 041 Z to H N O tg t7 H m wtz: S U. U u pxj G O p O W NO �. O C', l co N coCC 3 r01 Cm0 b m CA �. c Oa so m Ca W N 'Z V t4 .-! ti .•i m N b c •- ch 1.-t t0 c;.-i �' 6 N b rt .-t e7 •e-1 N w 'D ao H Cb Q. cV 4N0NCo Q O Os C� toN N .OQ• to Oa tor W tt- N '� t) e'1 rt e•t 0 rt O �-i W N rt W O W; O N -0 N r-1 C7 Ca v • _ O 77 •O o O C-3 Co O .�. •Y• Vim' W t0.? iT Om b tD tOD iN0 tb0 N -' � V �• et rt Qi � .� r• C7 rt rt m N � �.{ G7 12 a O M M M m M � .+ N w C* O u c o w N N o E c- C i E u c Go < C G Q Y M .-t 4 P f3. Y t0 W K� CD Y y M � IL v a e N a M A � V tL r � �.• n a o c to A A as o Y to r A v v t7 = a V z .0 A,h C6 V M W Z < • • • O • • < 0 6 • • O • • , F+ s H 00208 v r+ co C4 r °D C"l ' C2 {O. • - C d V � N � p• � P OI- 1.3 go C .s N p tl0 I 49 O V 4 M L- b cj Cl r+ r C1 U C4 O Q. v V J^ Yr o m N U UO t. ; r e U c $ _ Z � ' aN b vgu to cm; m - p A V claN �. , W .r Co pm C'1 V -0 cla I4 b r pj C Q N N m d vV a • r y • Y C p p c lw e c w _ A . a r O O Q V V Ees Y d E• .+ O O iw q $ E 0 •� g • EXHIBIT 36 Contra Costa County MAJOR EQUIPMENT COSTS OF TWO REGIONAL COMMUA`ICATIONS FACILITIES MAJOR CONVERTING AND UPGRADING COSTS - Total Capital Number of Units Unit Cost Investment MARTINEZ Microwave Line from Kreger Peak to - Pittsburg 1 30.000 30,000 Additional base stations 3 7.600 22.800 Additional multiplex channels .4 2.400 9.600 Conversion of mobile units 80 150 12.000 SUB TOTAL $74,400 RICHMOND - Microwave Line from Bald Peak to - Richmond 1 30,000 .30.000 Additional base stations 2 •7.600 15,200 - Additional multiplex channels 4 2,400 9.600 Addiitiona`consoles -2 20.000 40,000 Conversion of mobile units 37 150 5,550 SUBTOTAL $100,350 • - TOTAL COST OF CONVERTING AND UPGRADING $274,750 ESTIMATED ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS • Annual Depre- Annual Maint- Total MARTINEZ dation Costs enance Costs Annual Cost Radio Consoles (5 consoles) 3j750 2.400 5,150 Hue Stations (37 stations) 8.510 13,135 21.645 While Units (209 units) 15.675 17,165 33.440 Portable Units (62 unir) 9.920 3,534 13.4-54 Microwave Lines (4 lines) 8.000 2,880 10,880 Multiplex Channels (15 channels) 2.400 2.160 4.560 PIN Machines(2 lease) 4,188 CLEFS Machines (3 lease) 4,500 APB-receive only,machine (1 lease) 1,200 Public phone lines (25 lines) 25.056 Private plane lines (8 lines) 9.018 (48.255) (40.874) SUBTOTAL $133.691 00210 EXHIBIT 36 Annual Depre- Acuual Maint_ Total elation Costs enancc Costs AnnualCost RICHMOND Raft Consols 5.400 560 5.560 Base Stations (13 base stations) 2.990 4.615 7.605 h1obile Units(169 units) 12.675 24.365, 27.040: Portable Units(87 torics) 13.920 4.959, 28,879; Microwave Lim(3 lines) 6.000 2,160 8,160 Muldplex Channels(10 channels) 1.600 1.440 3,040 PIN Machines (2 lease) 49800-1 CLETS klachines(2 lease) 3,000 APB-receive only machine(I lease) 1.200 Public phone lines C24 lease) 6.750 Private phone lines (5 lease) 3,348 (42.185) (28.099) SUB TOTAL x89.382 TOTAL ANNUAL EQUIPMENT COSTS $223.073 { 0o;M The cost of depreciation, maintenance and the lease of telephone lines at the Martinez faci- lity would amount to about $134,-000 annually. The cost of depreciation, maintenance and the lease of telephone lines at the Richmond facility • would amount to almost $90, 000 annually. - The total equipment cost of operating two re- v, gional facilities would be about $25, 000 less a year than the annual equipment cost of one central facility. The difference results in • lower telephone line costs because of shorter distances to the two regional centers. When microwave lines replace phone line's, the cost difference would be eliminated. (3.4) The cost of operating two regional communication's , centers should be shared by the user agencies on the basis of the workload generated by each The same method of distributing costs among user agencies recommended for.one central facility should be employed with two regional facilities: Police agencies should enter into a contract with either the Richmond Police Department or Contra Costa County to share the cost of operating regional communications centers. First year charges should be based on the estimated 1972 call for service volume as described in Exhibit 37. following this page. Subsequent years' charges should be based on an agreed upon formula which reflects - -actual service usage. A comparison of the total annual cost of operating one central facility or two regional facilities results in the following conclusions: The total annual cost of operating-two regional faci- lities is about $155, 000 more than with one central facility. - 0021.2 - _132- z. W 16 c- P a r. V p w f N n m S, P ck m N a FO O P P N N m 1. 67H u r O e► .r C v o p h vi W as � ic r w a C D_ Y p r o N a F p • o .o G o o n u m m a o !i O ti [- .D b .0 e N w m N q a O q A O w O EO w w p v Q n n o p o o n m a o f p a o r n e f Y O f O e O Q O O O O F r. Q m P .•. A .i p O b !� !1 O b A f O f! f�g ft 10 Hi b p iQ A N w f A ♦ a f PN w q a b O M v - V tl p m O p It Q O t7 Y O O p .•i !. p O p w � p f O w w O O O O O O O yOy�� O O /O► O O O e f o vOi Si t P q o O ! S It P .qs b o C P df e• O m .► e e f !! q w P �. F • w Y o M �pM O r cq9 b ! "a O OOq Y �G A r N O fN7 q N m O M f � • ♦ M M - �.� o a r p o n r o • r � a n w o f p o� �'� O �iD W O P O O a p w N • n N O w O� ��pp ppp0 p p O o P O O p C) O r O q It A O I" V O w f .• F w N N O N p vpi a .•-. g C C FY YY Q ¢ on .� al G x a_ aZ a s w E 00213 wa 7 i With one central facility, each individual police agency--gxcept Brentwood, Clayton and Kensing- ton--can reduce its annual communication costs; with two regional centers, El Cerrito's share also = exceeds its present communications costs. •The increased cost of two regional facilities is directly attributable to the personnel costs of seven additional administrative and supervisory positions. ' (4) We Recommend the Establishment of One Central Communication Facility to Support All County Law Enforcement Agencies Based on our analysis of two alternative methods of consol- idating communications activities in the County, we recommend the establishment of one central facility. There appears to be no discernible advantage of creating two regional facilities over esta- blishing one central facility. In summary: The annual cost of two facilities is between $150, 000 and $200, 000 more in maintenance and operation than one facility. The annual communications workload throughout the County is not substantial enough to be unmanagable by one agency. The value of consolidation in terms of increased coordination among police agencies is more easily -realized with one central facility than with two re- gional facilities. One central facility will more easily accommodate the implementation of the state-wide "911" emergency call system. -133- 00-U r Report prepared for: •Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County • October 30, 1974 . ••. PRELIMINARY DESCRIPTION OF COMMUNICATIONS AND DISPATCH - SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES • -The preparztion of these materials was*financially aided through a,.Federal grant from the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration and the Office Of Criminal Justice Planning under the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe _t Streets Act of 1968, as amended. The opinions, findings, and conclusions ` 'in this publication are those of the author and are not necessarily those of the-Law Enforcement Assistance Administration or the Office of Crir:final . Justice Planning. Community Services Environment and Urban Division The Aerospace Corporation . 7 n: • PRELIMINARY• DESCRIPTION 'OF COMMUNICATIONS AND DISPATCH SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES L Introduction - . ' Under the terms of its contract with the Criminal Justice Agency of Contra Costa County, The Aerospace Corporation was'to provide sup- port to the Police Chiefs Association as,they prepare for the improvement' of law enforcement communications and dispatch operations within the County. Specifically, using existing data as a basis, Aerospace was to ' - prepare a preliminary description of a number of plausible options for ' updating and improving the regional law enforcement communications" and - - dispatch capability. Five such options have been identified: one integrated • regional center, two and three integrated subregional centers, county wide •coordinated communications and dispatch, and independent communications and dispatch. In this report, each option is conceptualized, described and • evaluated in a preliminary way. The re.ults of this brief study wire presented to a.comniittee of the Police Chiefs Association on 16 October 1974. This report comprises the material presented to the Chiefs, -augmented by additional information responsive to questions posed by them. ' The format employed is that of an • - - e -panded outline; the charts used for tie presentation are the basis for this report, augmented by descriptive text. It should be noted that the very.low level of effort of the stud- reported herein (les:; than one man-month) allowed only for technical judgements as the basis for most of the system elements posed. Detailed engineering and explicit conceptual design studies • - were not performed; instead, order-of-magnitude engineering and workload assessments provided the quantitative bases for the systems described. II. One Regional Facility A. -System Concepts . Key concepts suggested for the implementation of a single regional facility to service the law enforcement communications and dis- patch requirements of the County are the following: o Organizations served by the facility Police departments, county wide - o Organizations served by the facility Police departments, county wide Sheriff's department including ambulances (It should be noted that fire departments and emergency medical services other than ambulance dispatching are not included within the system.) o Voice communications--assuming that all voice frequencies. would be located in one band, probably UHF, then the system would comprise: One county wide police radio net to facilitate coordinated and supportive activities •• Three police radio nets per subregion, one for voice dis- patch, one for tactical use, and one for CLEMARS and backup tactical use o Computer-aided dispatch linked to full alphanumeric two-way mobile terminals in patrol vehicles; this extensive computer- aided/digital system appears feasible due to the large number" of field units to be serviced. o A communications and dispatch facility staffed by personnel of a new joint powers agency, under the supervision of a sworn officer. The regional communications and dispatch agency • envisioned to be established by joint powers authority is depicted iri Figure 1. The cities and county would create the agency, ' which in turn would establish a policy committee to reflect the cities' and county's interests in the overall operation of the agency. A director would be appointed to provide day-to-day management of the agency. The engineering, planning and main- tenance organization could perform these functions for all county communications equipment. The sworn officer appointed to the dispatch facility as a supervisor could be assigned by individual agencies for short time periods, such as 6 to l8 months, with :the assignment being rotated among the participating agencies. o Complaint operators and dispatchers working in the new facility would: 00217 N W d W p i V4 t- • �W - 1 ` G Wc� • d 0 V4 t-`+ WJA o U 44 JA AJAU r • gyp.,• O - � pU i� dr, >r: Be co-located Have separate functions reflecting the two stages of operation--complaint taking, dispatch Perform no other functions in*that. for example, all report taking would be performed by individual agencies so that any calls requiring report taking, or other activ- ities of a non-emergency nature, would be transferred immediately,on a hot line to the appropriate local agency o Functioning in conjunction with the regional facility, each agency would retain: • Seven digit telephone number for direct contact by citizens ' to the local police department • _ Hot line from the regional facility to facilitate direct con- tact and handoff of calls of a non-emergency nature ' Local'radio capability to support selected preplanned • l occasions such as parades. or for those rare occurrences in which the local watch commander decides to "take over" • a certain dispatch operation. For preplanned occasions, one of the tactical frequencies could be assigned to the • agency for local use, while emergency calls for that agency would still be handled at the regional center:- B. enter=B. Major Equipments The *major items of equipment that would be required to implement this single regional facility concept are the following: o dour mountaintop radio sites comprising redundant equipment for all frequencies, backup power, etc. These sites would be con- nected to eat-, other by microwave :.nd would provide microwave links and telephone lines to the local agencies as well, o' Satellite receivers`to support the use of portable radios, 0 . One base station at each agency to provide local radio capabilities. o Multi-channel. single band voice radio in every vehicle, probably • having at least a four frequency capability. o Voice scramblers if desired; however it should be noted that digital dispatch gives a considerable degree of privacy for normal operations. - -4- = . - 00219 AL 0 Computer-aided dispatch system based on the use of: o Computer-aided dispatch system based on the use of: Mini-computers - Computer driven displays - f • Magnetic tapes-and discs with files necessary to support the online dispatch operations and to capture the data needed for management reports Operations files include status data for vehicles and per- ' - sonnel and current incident data to assist the dispatcher in making the most appropriate assignment for an incident. Street address verification could be provided to assist the • complaint operator. Officer safety could be enhanced by having the computer check-the incident location for problems during previous calls there. Dispatch transactions pertinent to every occurrence could be automatically recorded so that Tnanagement reports could be easily prepared o Mobile digital terminals in approximately 170 tactical vehicles; these vehicles will also need a separate radio to Support the mobile digital equipment. Digital terminals withitwo-way, full alphanumeric capability in tactical vehicles offer many opera- ' tional advantages, such as: The capability of gaining access to national, state; and local data '.gases without dispatcher action greatly reduces the workload of the dispatcher and increases the effectiveness of the field forces. o PIN, CLETS, APB terminals, as supporting current operations,. would be located at: = Regional facility to provide access to data files for field officers not having a mobile digital terminal Individual agencies, as at present C. Rezional Facilities The key features of the facilities required to house and support this computer aided communications and dispatch system are: . 0 Operations Room of 1000 square feet, in which the complaint operators', dispatchers' and supervisors' consoles would be located. - i 4 .r. o ' Equipment Room of approximately 200 - 400 square feet, in which the computer, magnetic tapes, discs, voice scramblers, recorders and telephone equipment would be located. o A central county location is preferred in order to minimize telephone costs. • o The Concord EOC area, if available, appears to have sufficient area, filtered air and backup power, in a secure location, to • house the regional communications and dispatch facility. D. 911 Implications ' Looking toward the implementation of 911, this one regional facility concept would% o Be least difficult to implement and later add capabilities. , ' o Minimize the selective routing problems and cost due to the relatively few pockets of population that spread.across county boundries. o Facilitate the functions of the complaint-taking operator, Who " • could rely upon computer or microfilm stored data to determine which agency should respond to a.call for service. o Have hotlines available to each agency to facilitate.the transfer of non-emergency calls. E. Cost Estimates--Excluding 911 Components Order-of-magnitude cost estimates to procure, install and operate - this one xegional facility system are as follows: o Initial equipment costs. Upgrade voice radio systems $150, 000 • Modify and/or-buy six telephone consoles, seven radio consoles 100,.000 Procure computer-aided dispatch system 7500000 . Procure mobile digital terminals an - • central facility interface equipmentj} 600,000 Additio104 radio equipment for digital system 200,000- . $1, 800, 000 00,000•. $1, 800, 000 (1) Based on 170 vehicles. rnv.x. " OWL o Facilities. Modify Concord Police Building EOC - $50, 000. (Altern e: Build emergency operations _ center � ) $500, 000) o Annual costs. - • Salaries and fringe benefits (1971 Wage Data)(3) Directors and technical support(4) $194, 000 50 telephone operators and dispatchers 587, 000 5 radio room supervisors, - sworn officers 65, 000 Machine rentals and line costs, CLE TS, • = -PIN, APB and(r ►aintenance parts for all equipment .- 203, 000 • - - $1, 049, 000 III. Two Regional Facilities A. System'Concepts The concepts suggested for an integrated communications and dis- patch system functioning out of two regional facilities are these: - o Organizations served. , • Western Center: Richmond, Pinole, El Cerrito, Kensington, - San Pablo Police Departments • Sheriff's Department and ambulances, Western area Central Center: Remaining Police Departments ' Sheriff's Department and ambulances, • Central and'Eastern areas o Computer-aided dispatch system in each facility: less sophisticated and less capable than that considered cost effective for the single integrated facility, with limited digital data capability between the center and the patrol vehicles (possibly only status and ID data). (2) Communications and dispatching portion only. (3) Derived from data presented in Reference 1. - - (4) Maintenance'labor cost included in the Technical Support salaries. -7- 0022-2 i PIP- 0 Each agency retains (as for the "one facility" concept): Seven digit telephone number o Each agency retains (as for the "one facility" concept): . Seven digit telephone number Hot line from regional facility ` Local radio capability - o - .Two regional facilities system would, conceptually, have the same properties suggested for the one facility system for the following elements: Voice communications Staffing " B. Major Equipments ' Equipments required to implement this two regional facility system are these: - o The same equipments as for the "one facility" concept for the following system elements: - Four mountaintop radio sites - 'Satellite receivers - One base station at each agency Multi-channel, single band voice radio in every vehicle Voice scramblers (It should be noted that the limited digital. , • - communications will give added pri✓acy to the.disps-cch function.) 0 ' Computer-aided dispatch system. Due to the smaller number of field units serviced by each facility, - the systems conceptualized to be installed-at each of the tjvo regional facilities would each be of lesser capacity than that ' envisioned for the single facility system. An example of the smaller capacity at each center is .that fewer displays would be located there, although one more total display is required for a two centers system than for a one center system. Another example of smaller capacity is the operational files which must accommodate fewer personnel, vehicles and locations, -�- 00223 " While a single computer system located in one facility and linked by.microwave communications to the displays and other computer-connected equipment in the second facility is techni- cally feasible, the approach employing two separate computer subsystems appears to be both economically and operationally preferred. • o Limited digital communications with the vehicles. + This concept utilizes the voice radio for transmitting limited •digital data. The vehicle digital equipment's displays are . . basically lights ana its input devices are switches, which limits the digital transmissions to "canned" messages, generally comprising status and the vehicle identification. This system reduces the dispatchers workload considerably from a voice only system, since most status data *can he automat- ically entered into the computer. However, since only."canned"' • messages can be transmitted, all remote file accesses require dispatcher assistance, and dispatch and report messages are a--so voice messages. Thus, this system will reduce the dis- patchers workload from that of a "voice only" system, but involve greater dispatcher workload compared to that of a system employing two-way, full alphanumeric digital terminals. • • C. Regional Facilities_ Key features of the facilities required to support the two regional centers are: o Operations Room Western Center--530 square feet Central Center--530 square feet. • o Equipment Room, each Center--200 - 400 square feet, o New Richmond dispatch center and adjoining rooms could be suitable for Western Center. o Concord EOC appears suitable for Central Center. -9- 11024 D. 91l Implications , Looking to the introduction of 911, a system employing two regional facilities would have the following properties:• ' o Sorne selective routing capability; this would be required only in those telephone exchanges which cross county lines and those which would have subscribers in both the western and -central regions. o The computer and/or.microfilm equipment could assist the operator in determining whic.i agency should respond. . o -Hot lines between centers and to each agency. E. Cost Estimates--Exluding 911 Components • The order-of-magnitude costs to procure, install and operate the two regional facilities system are as follows: o Initial equipment costs. ' Upgrade voice radio systems . $150., 000 Modify and/or buy six telephone consoles, - eight-radio consoles 110,000 ' . Procure two computer-aided dispatch ' systems ' 900, 000 • Procure mobile digital status equip:nent and central facilities interface equipments 100, 000 $1, 260, 000 o Facilities. Modify Richmond Police Department Center and Concord EOC - $100, 000 o . Annual costs. Salaries and fringe benefits (1971 Wage Data) Directors and technical support $224, 000 Western Center - 25 Operators 294, 000 - 5 Supervisors 65, 000 - Eastern Center - 25 Operators 294,000 - 5 Supervisors 65,000 Machine rentals and line costs, CLETS, PIN,APB and maintenance parts for all - equipment )60, 000 $1, 102,000 • -10- 0022) o . Alternative approach. " If it is decided to provide a full two-way alphanumeric•capa- bility in the mobile digital terminals, an additional $800, 000 • of equipment would be required for the more sophisticated mobile equipment and the additional radios required in the vehicles to support the equipment's operation. ' On an annual basis, an additional allowance of $80, 000 would be required to maintain the more sophisticated digital communications - equipment. IV. Three Regional Facilities - • The organization and much of the material of this section is identical to the previous two. Thus, explanatory comments will be.minimized. - ; A. System Concepts . 0 Organizations served. Western Facility: Richmond, Pinole, El Cerrito, Kensington., • - San Pablo Police Departments - Sheriff's Department and ambulances, Western area Central Facility: Clayton, Concord, Martinez, Pleasant _ Hill, Walnut Creek.Police Departments Sheriff's Department and ambulances for Central area (including LaFayette) • Eastern Facility: Antioch, Brentwood, Pittsburg Police ' Departments Sheriff's Department and ambulances for Eastern area o Computer-aided dispatch in Western and Central Facilities; identical to those conceptualized for the two facility'system. o Manual dispatch in Eastern Facility, with microfilm system to -assist in dispatch decisions. - o Staffing. Western and Central Facilities--similar as for the two - facilities system 00226 ' - -11- } Eastern Facility--reduced staffing; in general, only two people needed to handle the-telephone and radio, while one person could work alone during periods of especially low activity ' o Same concepts posed for systems employing one and two regional facilities apply to: • Voice communications Individual agencies telephone, hot line, and radio capabilities • B. Major Equipments o Voice radio equipment--same as for system concepts employing one or two regional facilities. o Computer-aided dispatch system. Western and Central Facilities--same as for system employing two regional facilities, due to the verysimilar workloads involved Eastern Facility--manual system only, augmented with micro- film data storage and retrieval equipment, due to the relatively low workload anticipated o Digital equipment in vehicles. Western and Central Facilities--same as for the system employing tv.,o regional facilities ' Eastern Facility--none o PIN, CLETS, APB terminals in: • Regional facilities Individual agencies C. Regional Facilities o Operations Room Western Facility--530 square feet Central Facility--530 square feet Eastern Facility--160 square feet . 0 Equipment Room Western Facility--200 - 400 square feet Central Facility--200 - 400 square feet o No suitable area' seen in Antioch or Pittsburg for Eastern Facility. D. 91 f Implications o Selective routing for three centers is simpler and less- expen- sive than for I2 or more centers, -as fewer telephone central offices would require modification. o Computer-assist feasible--Western, Central Centers. o Hot line between three centers and to each agency. E. Cost Estimates--Excluding 911 Components ' o Initial equipment costs. Approximately same as for two centers $1, 260, 000 o Facilities - modify buildings in each area . $110, 000 o Annual costs. ' Salaries and fringe benefits (1971 Wage• Data) Directors and technical support $224, 000 ' 'Western Center -*25 Operators 294, 000 5 Supervisors 65, 000 Central Center - 25 Operators 294, 000 - 5 Supervisors 65, 000 Eastern Center - 6 Operators 70, 000 . -.5 Supervisors 65, 000 Machine rentals and line costs, CLETS, PIN, APB and maintenance parts for all equipment 180, 000 $1, 267,,000. V. County Wide Coordinated Communications and Dispatch A. System Concepts • In a manner similar to that currently employed in Orange County, it is envisioned for this concept that a single County communication organ- ration would provide planning and engineering"for all County and city govern- . _ ment radio and telephone services. Each police agency could benefit from -13- use of the communication organization's technical expertise and maintenance staff, as well as participate in joint purchasing. The County communication organization would dispatch for all County departments and provide a limited backup dispatch capability for city police departments. Specific features of this concept are: o' . Organizations unchanged, with addition of County communications organization for engineering, planning and maintenance. o Voice Communications. Similar to integrated regional concepts, but with more complicated and expensive control circuitry since the dispatchers who are distributed throughout the county must have some means of knowing which transmitters are available for use. This same requirement exists • in the-regional center; however the implementation is cheaper for co-located dispatchers o _Limited backup capabilities among agencies for the staffing . assumed for this analysis. (However, an enlarged County staff could provide backup services.) o Computer-aided dispatch. . Richmond, Concord, Walnut Creek and the Sheriff's Department might justify individual micro computer- aided dispatch systems and very limited digital com- munications with their vehicles B. Facilities - o Staffed by individual agencies; operators having other duties. o Larger, quieter, more secure area needed in most cities. • C. 911 Implications . 0 Basic 911 will provide lower quality of service to public because basic 911 provides no selective routing and a large percentage of 911 calls would either need to be transferred or the caller referred to a seven-digit number. Transferring a call would cause some time delay as well as increase the chance of losing the call. Referring the call will greatly delay a citizen in reaching the appropriate agency. To illustrate the problem, a citizen living I • 008329 -14- in a city and within a telephone exchange boundary which con- tains subscribers mostly living within another city, or within an unincorporated area of the County, would be initially connected to the wrong agency every time he dialed 911. 01 Selective routing would be costly because each telephone company central office would require modification; some would require -considerable amount of new equipment. D. Cost Estimates o Additional equipment costs. - • Upgrade voice radio system $150, 000 Control equipment 30, 000 . • $180, 000- o 180, 000'o ,Annual costs. - - - Salaries and fringe benefits (1971 Wage Data) Directors and technical support $194, 000 Dispatch personnel $1, 263, 000 Machine rentals and line costs, CLE TS, PIN, APB and maintenance parts for all equipment 75, 000 $1, 532, 000 o Facilities and 911 costs not included. VI. Independent Communications and Dispatch • A. System Concepts This concept is the baseline: it assumes a continuation of current -independent dispatch operations. Key features and implications of this con- cept are: o Organizations unchanged. - o Voice communications unchanged. Excessive equipment used ' • Poor interagency communications Inefficient use of radio channels Very limited backup capabilities among agencies o Computer-aided dispatch. Same possibilities as noted for county wide coordinated' communications and dispatch B. Facilities o Same as for county wide coordinated communications and dispatch. C.- 911 Implications - • o Same as for county wide coordinated communications and dispatch. D. '' Cost Estimates o Annual costs. ' Salaries and fringe benefits (1971 Wage Data) Dispatch personnel $1, 263, 000 Machine rentals and line co�ij�, CLE-YS.. . PIN, APB and maintenance127, 000 • $1, 390, 000 ' o Facilities and 911 costs, engineering staff costs, (2Aot included.. VII, Operational Implications The following summarizes the key operational implications--advantages and disadvantages--of the several alternative concepts. (1) This maintenance costs includes labor as well as parts. - (2) This is only approach that does not assume a County communications agency. The salaries for the communication director, engineer and clerical support (now in Sheriff's Department) are not included here. Much of the other personnel costs in the current Sheriff's communications group are included in mantenance costs. -1G- 0021. 1 A. One Facility , o •Full digital communications implies: - Field forces have best access to data bases - Increased privacy in dispatching ' - - Instant recall of messages in vehicles Voice and digital capabilities provide excellent interagency- communications p Computer-aided dispatch implies: Preplanned'deployment of field forces easily accomplished Operational data available for management reports, analysis, planning Increased effectiveness of field forces ' o Facility, equipment and manning expandable.. into full Emergency Operations Center. B. Two Facilities ' ' o Excellent interagency communication's. ' o Computer-aided dispatch implies: Preplanned deployment of field forces easily accomplished Operational data available for management reports, • analysis, planning Increased effectiveness of field forces o Expandable into two emergency operations centers. C, •Three Facilities a Eastern region gains increased interagency* voice communications. o County wide operational data not available. D. Coordinated Communications and Dispatch o More efficient, improved voice radio capability derived from county wide coordinated planning. - - • -17- , 0 911 very costly or effectiveness greatly reduced. o Limited backup capabilities for major occurrences. - • E. Independent Communications and Dispatch 0 ' - Extremely limited backup capabilities for major occurrences. o Inefficient use of dispatch personnel, radio equipment, facilities. 0 911 very costly or effectiveness greatly reduced. • VUL Summary Observations ' • In summary, the major issues identified by this, brief study are these: A. Or granizational Issues o Joint powers agreement posed would: • Retain local control of operations. Commit individual agency for immediate future.only o Separate communications agency posed: Would be responsible to all using agencies Could coordinate all emergency services communications B. 911 Impact 0 Any of the integrated regional approaches would provide higher quality 911 services at lower costs than either coordinated or "independent dispatch operations. .C. Facility Requirements - • o Expanded Richmond dispatch facility appears adequate for - Western region. o The Concord EOC appears adequate for an integrated facility in the Central region. o Due to noise and cro%%,dedness, most current facilities require modification for continued independent use. - 00233 - • - - -18- D. O !rational Effectiveness• ' • 0 Systems employing one regional facility or two facilities can yield: Comro rahlr f.ff .r}i., n '- 1T1 rnAr�i f • . � ANN • D. Operational Effectiveness o Systems employing one regional facility or two facilities can yield: Comparable effectiveness in coordinated and internal operations ' Effective communications during major occurrences Computer-generated operational data for future planning o Systems employing three or more facilities imply: ` More difficult coordination problems Reduced effectiveness during major occurrences County wide operational data difficult and expensive to obtain E. Cost Impact o -Single regional facility system--lowest integrated system cost. o. ' Two regional facilities system--only slightly higher cost than for single facility. _ Reference 1: Final Report on the Police Services Study Contra Costa County June 15. 1973 - Booz Allen, Public Administration Services, Inc, -19- i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Second Amendment to the Agreement with the Byron Sanitary District. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a second amendment effective July 1, 1975 to an agreement entered into on July 13, 1959 with the Byron Sanitary District under the terms of which the County agrees to pay a service fee for treatment facilities of the District in accordance with -the schedule based on daily attendance of boys and attendants. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order,entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board,of. cc: Byron Sanitary District County Administrator Supervisors County Auditor—Controller affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 Public Works J. R. ,OLSSON, Clerk Buildings and Grounds By Deputy Clerk H sa 1sn4cA§WPubl1c Works N. In sham 00M i. ' SEC..�.n :....._ ._� •"REEM`IT .:►._ �;:.. . .: (Byron Bcys• :a.-:c - Se• a a Treatment Fees) 1. =-_tive Date and Parties . Ef g--Ipie on July 1, 1975, the Coun ,.. of Ccn,:ra Costa (hereinafter cal le i 'a political subdiv;s;C.n of the State of California, and .,he an Sanitary'District- (herei. er--: eallell "District"),. a political sutdivision of the State of California, . : mutually agree as.follows: -ose. The above-:voted Car-+e= desire to amend for the second =--- agreement they entere—4 ru y .3, '!959, and :irs: c "arZh 1, 1966 (effective da=: '• ::d^:ert. Subparagraphs ;a an Cb) of Paragraph (3) of the .sail Hrs- =_-en ea agreement are 'rereb-y a=ended as follows: : County agrees to pay a service fee for treatment facilities of the District in accordance :pith the following. schedule based on daily..,.attendance of boys and attendants (a) Five dollars ($5.00) per capita per,year°. for each boy. (b) Three dollars ($?.JO) per capita per year for each attendant. 4. Effect. Except for the second amendment agreed to herein, the agreement of Julys13, 1959 as first amended on Narch� 1, 1966 remains in full force avid.. effect. COUP OF , COST BYRON SANITARY.DISTRICT. ,r By ;: rman of ChaIrmart of, the-Board. .o the Board ,of: ors Directors ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, County Clerk 9y GC & ex officio Clerk,",Board of Seve'try Supervisors By Deputy Glit. RECOMMEMI ED FOR:.AEPROFAL. B - it: y • Y t . M4r • Counl;y Administrator APP.-G'v ED ALS TO FORK 'GE" "T AUSE3'I, County Course! _ . 0.-z_5F 00235'' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 1.19 115 in the Matter of Amendment Number 3 to Contract ' with the State of California, Employment Development Depart- ment. (Contract No. COD-OJT 9400-139) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute Amendment Number 3 to the June 24, 1974 Contract with the State of California, Employment Development Department, for the Work Incentive-Career Opportunity Develop- ment Program, under the terms of which contract services will be extended from August 31, 1975 to November 30, 1975:- PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: State Employment Witness my hand and the Seal of the Boardof Development Department Supervisors c/o Personnel affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 _15 Director of Personnel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator H za ,zS,ouns Auditor-Controller By Deputy Clerk N. Ingr ham a 00 *7 AHr �r c .2MMM • �c�'i Kiwt CRs r arAOL �. Contract No. CDI)-GJT 9400-n Amendment UO• 3• ]�j3�+ t; • TIM SrAn or CALiF� I • r` EnPLOYU NT DEVEIORIENT DEPARTMENT, - • XCREMMM CLUM Mc . AND ?a - •rrr rrr.ilillr...�r...��i OM9= rj/yrrr..r��,rr� � R CiYA{.i• i. 140VZO IM VJMRM* the above-refereed contract provides that the coatnwt easy beL!"d , by written agreement of both partfezet; W TUB AMM, effectiver ...,'now 14,1, , by amd between the Depeu'tanent end the Contractor, it 3s nae+ 210 Ull agreed that: 1. MW term of the Contract specified fon paragraph l is extended from August 31, 19" to lioveaber 30, 1975. . " �•;� s`*, yam.�,..� r.1� r :+a»L*:�r t3w':.-4 YLMt Gll c='iMia" for e;:.•`:f:•.r2 1.ar Z �*r«:tt c^.."ZC f ei =Lths t Se"AL SW Top lam Lup 00;76A b"40 how Except a►s hereby amended, ail teres and conditions of ttne contract between the V.-Parta.at and the Contractor remain unchaenged and is run force and ottect. IN %[7TA9MWRCRWFjChia asendaaat has been 8;909d is gt ttstplfe+ata by and ore behsif of. the parties hereto thin day. • R�gds EIMPLOYIIENT DEVIfL4PRENT DEPARUIENT �f4 W. AL &"M $igae�tverer s t2e Mame MP or Print •w greet r A mine• E1 f s�r__..rr, lfty � r+�tc�r ti a » . rooaR TltU • SEP ,2 1 75 OCT 2 STS 00M s e In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 1975 In the Matter of Supplement to Amended License Agreement with International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Chairman is AUTHORIZED to execute a Supplement to Amended License Agreement For IBM Program Products with the International Business Machines Corporation to improve teleprocessing systems capability (Programs 5798/AXR and 5798/AZN) at a cost of $1,416 for a 12 month period beginning September 15, 1975. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc:- IBM Corporation Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c/o Data Processing SupervifOrs Data Processing offixed this 2nd day of Sentember, 19 75 County Auditor—Controller J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By____2 ` Deputy Clerk H za 12n4 - I S-M N. In aham MANY i ........... International Business Machines Corporation Armonk,New York 10504 Supplement to Amended License Agreement for IBM Proogrant Products (For Specially Developed IBM Programs) t From: International Business hiacidnes Corporation Refere"UeeaseA'reemeatKo-: CO2131 B=n&06oe Address: 2901 PERALTA OAKS COURT srPplemeat xo.1 003 OAKLAND CA 94605 Baaek Otbca No.: 46S Name and Address of Customer: Customer No.: 2159000 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DATA PROCESSING CENTER FINANCE BUILDING MARTINEZ CALIFORNIA 94S53 International Business Machines Corporation (twat) is pleased to confirm your order for licenses for the Specially Developed IBtiI Programs listed below.IBM hereby grants the Customer nontransferable.nonexclusive licenses to use each of these licensed programs in machine readable forth on type/serial numbered CPUs and/or to nt lim program documentation as specified below under the terms of the above referenced License Agreement for 11111 Program Products as modified by the Amendment for Specially Developed IBIi Programs,which is hereby supplemented to include the following: letstallatioa ?excite Designated CPU DesMarw iptated Location Applies (umths) 4Xta11cense piton te" Payawnt Period Program/Material Type/Srrial Number CPU wtae Stated) Months? 5798/AXR 2040-21708 Martinez No 1 48.00 12 5798/A7-N 2040-21708 Martinez No 1 70.00 12 Estimated Date Prnaratmnin Shipment Date Services Period Ends Designated IBdf Error Correction Service Locadon 08/15/75 Palo Alto 10/31/74 Each Specially Developed II31I Program is distributed on nn"as is"basis without warranty. During a specified number of months immediately following initial availability of each licensed program designated as the Program- ming Service- Period, and referenced above, the Customer may submit documentation to a designated teat location when he encounters a problem which his diagnosis indicates is caused by a licensed program error.During this period only,teat through the program sponsur(s) will,without additional charge,respond to an error in the current unaltered release:of the licensed program by issuing known error correction information to the Customer reporting the problem and/or issuing corrected code or notice of availability of corrected code. however, teat does not guarantee service results or represent or warrant that all errors will be corrected. Any on-site programming services or assistance will be provided at a charge. For program documentation which is shipped prior to shipment of the complete program,Programming Services are not applicable. Under the license Agreement for I111I Program Products, the Customer has agreed that until that Agreement is specifically terminaled by the C•u=tomer upon one month's prior written notice to[tsar,the terms of that Agreement as amended will take precedence over the Terris of any present or future order from the Customer for licenses.The Customer has further agreed that his acceptance of future deli,er; -if any limn=ed program acrd/or related optional materia6 its ntachir-readable form anclior prngram documentation is conclusive evidence of his agreement that the license for such a licensed program,related optional materials or program documenta- tion is governed by the teen:of that Agreement as&mendr j. llontldy charges are waived after billing for the numb of u ' - indicated un rayment Period above. . N. Bogge s_ Intemation sine Ma i s tporatio l G _ t:P 2 1975 Chairman, isors Date I�--------- %-- _ --- -J---- --- -------- ------ft sialatury Tide ------------ -K--. -------- On-- Ll �75--------- Xanw Yr!tee or Print) Date W240 tial.:sec !'/ease send aYcommanimtion.ttotrv-atits branch oeTec---sddrr=Hoed r-teuoanteasnotigedtothe contrary. lC M.•�l, A'aaw 1T.'peoePrint) 240 n: •:4+c rddres;listrd rlwx anless notified to the contrary- ±c rr.,,.,, !'lease send alp+c+aa settaic scions rn±r.�s as its branch o�4c. t In the Board of .Supervisors of Contra Costal County, State of California September 2 0119 75 In the Matter of Fee-For-Service Contracts with Physicians, Dentists, Optometrists and Podiatrists Utilized by the County Health Department and County Medical Services. In connection with the rates of compensation for fee-for-service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists utilized by County Medical Services and the County Health Department, this Board of July 23, 1974 adopted Resolution No. 74/636A setting the rates for same; and This Board today received contracts and/or amendments thereto with those fee-for-service physicians, dentists, optometrists and podiatrists whose names are listed in "Exhibit A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as if set forth in full, implementing Resolution No. 74/636A; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said contracts and/or amendments thereto are APPROVED with the understanding that the payment rates specified therein may be changed as a result of the compensation review now underway; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director, Human Resotrces Agency, is AUTHORIZED to sign the contracts on behalf of this Board. PASSED by the -Board September 2, 1975 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Boord of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Wilness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Orig: Human Resources Agency affixed this 2nd day of Septemberj9 75 Attn: Contracts Adm. J. R. OLSSODJ, Clerk cc: Medical Director By �• Depu:y Clerk Acting Health Officer N. In sham Director of Personnel County Auditor-Controller County Administrator H 24 8175 lONN EXHIBIT A MEDICAL SERVICES NUMBER RATE, EFFE_CTIVE Frederic H. Pollock, M.D. #26-731 $17.00 per hour August 1, 1975 Paul Gee, M.D. #26-732 $17.00 per hour July 24, 1975- Frank 975Frank H. Lucido, M.D. #26-733 $1,895.50 monthly August 3, 1975 l�91 CCC Standard Form - 144600 Aucaust 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) NUMBER I . Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the belovi-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Frederic H. Pollock, M.D. g , anez, 94 (address) Phone (b) (, I Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 40.00 Per week Rate: S 17.00 Per Hour ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week id accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Meek ] Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services If so Indicated in 2. td).) (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes [GS No (e) Effective Date August 1, 1975 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and requires professional services to supplement those rendered by County emp:oyees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section- 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or health Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is Indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective dates as indicated in Section 2, through the next following June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent. or by ei1L3r party, by giv:tij 30 days a.ivanc written notice thereof to the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Ek,.ard, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the County agree that each subsequent contract will deprosent the result ooffall i 020 nenotiations be ween the Contractor, Crinty and any organization representing the Contractor. " 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written invoice on the form proscribed by the County, clearly showing.services rendered to'the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services .rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated In Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved period. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Reoulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, Independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-omployed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. 11. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate orofessional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. - - i2. insurance. Couisty shaii keup in eiiect a policy or policies of rianility insurance, Including professional malpractice liability with total limits of- not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY CONTRACTOR BY `�• Director, Human Resources Agency Frederic R. Pollock, M.D. ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board By , Deputy RECON1.1ENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACIOXMILEDGED: C. L. Van Marter/t Director, Human Resources Agency t' George Degnan,�M.D. Medical Director or Ilea Ith Officer 0094A i ` CCC Standard Form ..�., 144600 August 1974 AGREEKINT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) ry 2 NUMBER -._ ,.�»....-. i , Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. (a) Contractor (name) Paul Gee, M.D. (address) 1724 1-buntain Blvd., Oakland, CA 94611 Phone 339-9548 (b) ] Physician [ ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) Method of Payment + [Xj Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours 8.00 Per week Per Hour Rate: S 17.00 - [ ] Vleekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S - Per Sleek Monthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes FX] No (c:) Effective Date July 24, 19T5 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under the terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services and - requires profess:ona! services to s;pplacp-nt those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specialty trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services, Contractor shall render the services described above ('sncludina all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are rentsired at times and locations specified by the Medical nirerfnr or H?ai+h Officer. The aforenamed shall provide Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. If availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shall be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5, Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective dates as indicated in Section 2, through the neat following .lune 30th, but It may be cancelled by mutual consen:, or by eiti.or party, by giving 30 days ac;vance written not:;.e thereof :o the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by the Contractor. The Contractor and the County agree that each subsequent contract will *?-present the result of all IN'245► negotiations between the Contractor, County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written invoice on the form prescrihed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. If the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services .rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) If weekly or monthly paid, at the rate Indicated In Section 2. (c) or pro- rata arrount for said approvcd per!od. 8. Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involvina the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. If. Privileges. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit nedicai corporations. i2. insueante. i.ouaty semii Keep in eireci a policy or pond es of iiaoittry insurance, including professional malpractice liability with total limits of not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY CONTRA TOR Paul Gee, M Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSON, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the Board Qy , Deputy RECOW-1EN ED FOR APPROVAL: AC100,1LEDGED: C. D'. Van Marter Oi4ector, man Res%irps Agency Geo.ee Degnan, M.D. Medical Director or Health Officer `4 - CCC Standard Form , 114600 Auaust 1974 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (Contract Paid Physicians) ' NUMBER __ ---(0 7-3 3............... 1 . Parties. The County of Contra Costa ("County") and the below-named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: 2. Variables. - (a) Contractor (name) Frank H. Lucido, N.D. (address) 100 Devon Ave. #26, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Phone 938-8311 (b) [� Physician [. ] Dentist [ ] Podiatrist [ ] Psychiatrist [ ] Orthodontist [ ] (c) I-lethod of Payment [ ] Hourly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for each hour of actual service rendered (not including on-call time) in accordance with established schedule. Scheduled Hours Per Rate: S Per Hour [ ] Weekly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a week in accordance with established schedule. (Includes payment for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) Rate: S Per Meek LX�1 I•Sonthly Paid Contract: Contractor paid for services rendered during a month in accordance with established schedule. (Includes paymeno for on-call services if so indicated in 2. (d).) $1,895.50 (d) On-Call Availability: [ ] Yes - [ ] No - (e) Effective Date August 3, 1975 (f) Compensation for anesthesia services on-call (if applicable) will be as per Board Order currently in effect covering these services and not computed as part of maximum yearly salary and treated as a separate service not covered under tho terms on this contract. 3. Purpose. County operates a Health Department and a County Medical Services anJ roquires professlonal sbrvices to supplement those rendered by County employees. Contractor is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform special professional services and give advice, education and training in medical and therapeutic matters, as indicated in Section 2. (b), pursuant to Government Code Section 31000 and Health and Safety Code Section 1451. 4. Services. Contractor shall render the services described above (including all services normally and customarily connected therewith) and such additional services as are required at times and locations specified by the Medical Director or Health Officer. The aforenamed shall provides Contractor with a schedule of professional services reasonably in advance of their effective dates. The County shall not arbitrarily or abruptly change assigned duties without consultation and agreement of the Contractor. In cases of emergency or where otherwise required, the Medical Director or Health Officer may make such changes in the duty schedules as are required. if availability for on-call duties is indicated (Section 2. (d).) the Contractor shalt be for such on-call services as required by the County. 5. Term. The term of this agreement shall be from its effective date= as indicated in Section 2, throuah the next folio::ina June 30th, but it may be cancelled by mutual consent, or by either party, by Hivis:y 30 days auvance written notice thereof -fa the other. 6. Modification and Extension. This contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by -the Contractor. The Contractor and the County agree that each subsequent contract will daprosent the result of all 1002,47 F; 6. Modification and Extension. ThIs contract may be modified and/or extended by written order of the Board, accepted in writing by -the Contractor. The Contractor and the County agree that each subsequent contract will deprosent the result of all W247 reclotiations between the Contractor,'County and any organization representing the Contractor. 7. Payment. Each month the Contractor shall submit a written Invoice on the form prescribed by the County, clearly showing services rendered to the County. if the services rendered by weekly or monthly Contractor are not equal to or greater than the services scheduled, a pro-rata payment proportionate to the value of services rendered to services scheduled will be made. Upon processing of each invoice and approval by the County Medical Director or Health Officer, the County shall pay Contractor: (a) if hourly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) for each hour approved; or (b) if weekly or monthly paid, at the rate indicated in Section 2. (c) or pro- rata amount for said approved period. 8, Mileage Reimbursement. The Contractor shall be entitled to mileage reimbursement according to Ordinance Code, Section 36-8.1802, for necessary travel involving the performance of his services. Claims for mileage reimbursement will be submitted monthly on "demand" vouchers in accordance with established procedure. 9. Regulations. Contractor agrees to abide by all rules, regulations and procedures for the operation of the County Medical Services or the Health Department. 10. Status. Contractor functions as self-employed, independent agent, providing professional services. Contractor is, therefore, solely responsible for self- employment Social Security taxes, income taxes and any other taxes levied against a self-employed person. Contractor does not assign such obligation to the County for collection or administration. I1. Privileaes. Contractor will retain the right to belong to and be represented by appropriate professional organizations such as physicians unions, medical societies and non-profit medical corporations. i2. It15Urdnce. County snail keep in eiiecT a policy or policies of H aDsiiry insurance, including professional malpractice liability with total limits of. not less than $5,000,000 covering both the County and Contractor for services performed by the Contractor for the County under this agreement. 13. Assignment. Contractor shall not assign or transfer any interest hereunder with- out the expressed permission of the County ?Medical Director or Health Officer. COUNTY CONTRACTOR By OWNriAll 1 Frank H. Lucido, D. Director, Human Resources Agency ATTEST: J.R. OLSSO4, County Clerk and ex officio Clerk of the bard By Deputy RECO-MENDED FOR APPROVAL: ACKMILEDGED: C. L. Van Marter �►� �� 1 Director, Human Resources Agency George Degnan, M.D. Medical Director or Health Officer -8 F. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Continuing in Effect Until September 30, 1975 the Provisions of the Agreement for Professional Services Contracts - Standard Form M4600 Rev. 11/74 (Fee-for-Service Contracts) The Board of Supervisors on August 5, 1975 having been.: advised that the Agreement for Professional Services contracts executed by certain physicians working for the County terminated on June 30, 1975; and . The Board on that date having extended said agreements until August 31, 1975; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that those Agreements for Professional Services contracts executed during the 1974-1975 fiscal year and in effect on June 30, 1975 will remain in force and effect as to the terms and conditions stated in the agreement until September 30, 1975; and The County Auditor-Controller is authorized to make payment under the terms and conditions of those agreements until September 30, 1975. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. - 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Originating Department: affixed this 2nd day of September , 19 75 Office of County Administrator . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 • *44 N. InEffaham cc: Director, HRA County Medical Director Acting County Health Officer Auditor-Controller County Counsel Director of Personnel County Administrator In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California! September 2 -P19 75 In the Matter of Authorizing Attendance at Meetings. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Helaine G. Gann and Marie E. Poe of the Office of Economic Opportunity are AUTHORIZED to attend a National Head Start Handicap Conference at Houston, Texas during the period from September 21, 1975 to September 2+., 1975, expenses to be paid by Federal funds. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Office of Economic Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Opportunity Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 75 County Auditor J. R. OLSSON Clerk B � Deputy Clerk Maxine M. Neufel H 24 8/75 20M r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Exercising Option to Extend Lease with Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 1-5, for Premises In San Pablo. The County of Contra Costa has in effect a lease with Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Local 1-5, dated August 26, 1974 for premises at 1515 Market Avenue, San Pablo, California, presently occupied by the Mental Health Program of the County Medical Services; and Section 5, Page 1, thereon grants to the County the option to extend said lease upon the terms and conditions as set forth in the master lease; IT I3 BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County hereby EXERCISES its option to extend the lease for a period of one year, effective September 1, 1975. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975;: h. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors. Lessor via R/P armed this 2nd d of 3e tember. 19 Buildings and Grounds °y --� 5 Human Resources Agency /� J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller gy / Deputy Clerk County Administrator County Medical Services Crai H 24 8/75 10M H 24 6175 IoM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 In the Matter of Exercising Option to Extend Lease With Neighborhood House Inc. for Premises in Richmond. The County of Contra Costa has in effect a lease with Neighborhood House Inc. dated September 24, 1974 for premises at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond, California, presently occupied by the County Health Department; and Section 3, Page 1, thereof grants to the County the option to extend said lease upon the same terms and conditions for a period of one year; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County hereby EXERCISES its option to extend the lease for a period og�Aone year, effective September 1, 1975• PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the, minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Public Works Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Real Property Supervisors Lessor via R/P affixed d,m n -d°y of3tembeBuildings and Grounds r. 19 11 Human Resources Agency . J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Health Department By Deputy Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator H Crai X1252 H 24 8175 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 1n the Matter of Refund of Park Dedication Fee. On the recommendation of the Director of Planning,. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that as provided in Section 920-12.012 of the County Ordinance Code the County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to refund to Mrs. Ferrell England, 5733 Olinda Road, E1 Sobrante, California 911803 the $695 park dedication fee (P. D. No. 386--72) Y paid in connection with issuance of Building Permit No. 836011. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. s` A <r •did 3 'J �A :f l% 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and coned copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand'and the Seat of the Board of cc: Mrs. Ferrell England Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 2nd d of September 19 75° Public Works Director ay Acting County Building J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Ins ectorD y Deputy County Auditor-Controller B aig Clerk County Counsel County Administrator 0.li:�IGx.1ky' H 24 BP5 10M 3 - y CO - CC�'TP.�i CGS�/-� . f3t��`f`,' k� FL�h.!tV1h� ��Y,SRtly:''It� s ,�� Yrtnur G lt.11l DATE -, `r-August 25, 197 Cou�z� ldninlstratorzrry An�nanN A `�Dehae� 1 SUB��CT rezrell�England � 3 Y r ,�� aiiiu.T:g� OnAugust 24, 19.75, you referred a ,letter: dated August_ F:err�ll England requesting the 'refund of a par. dells cation f ""She',,Is=re uestin� .the.refund..of 695: . ark' dedication_f '. q g � p ee paid�on�Apnl. x �„ Y LS 4 1972 at the tie .when they obtaa.ned a :building permit,, 4 T'herp}arcel��,�� questions kas _legally creas ted: by the Tei�rksburyHeights subd�.vionn� Y'cY Section 92Q-12 012 of the _Ordinance Code provides impertinent follows r F the develo went consists of one sink le famtl ` structure P g y ' on 'a single parcel:, legally created before S epte ert s and;;of an agency to develop?and ma�.ntan the l�`�h paras-not ' been provided=: (Section :920 12 010) within{three "years after ,< _ � �{ J Y =__fees6 were__. pal, ,,:...,an if the person-,,.,who paid the fee sod re nests. the: fees still held h the count under Section�. q -s , x j •� Y Y 92 12 008 will be :refunded if development of�park�fac1¢lztes�' � ` - r�^�� Since the parcel;was creat°ed prior to September 30,` 1971; and a�oie�than hree �4 kd years have ;elaps,ed since their spar - edicat�.on:fee payment, Feriel�lEng�Iand��* is eligible for �a refund in that an ::agency to develop�and�mazntain parlcs��has,��,,�- not been provided zn .this unincorporated .area I rrecommend�.thaL',�695�be�i refunded as ;..requested: - r � t �-r _ Please � lace this matter beforethe Board`of Su ervisors�for cont -P p ur�ence,ands-,, authorization r A.0 FMk t d •iz cc - Supervisor.:Kenny CoCunty 'Counsel 1 oun�lcBuilding Inspector" - 4 b ✓ � 1 1�v.G c° •5.� 1 -.. ' x x t J C .j�-s -+�',p�n' llh"�"'4•''7 p•k`s"/" t A 'r„`'' _ i•..4 t t � fi tt arm 4: � -r-}«,- '"+' i' -.�' a� �"' �"• ) �ti`t. 1(yirs � ap"`� •t �"S i.,;�;'�. ��'� f ''>�+ .r 4. („�^f� r w - y J,_ ",>h.-:.:. �.`..-._'p��„� ."ra-;._..�.".,•o rr jh .`.,'�,�i�'�t��+{>.�it� �;xes+�a¢""�.�;�i��n�;:. t .-:,i, a a _.t..:-..4r._,t .-_ sem.:".h.... .r.7n:_t'n.+._.... .V,. .-w..Q-w`:....'u F ..,._ �.f e vrt;.t''. •k .. r_ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Write-Off of Delinquent General Accounts Receivable. On recommendation of the County Auditor-Controller and the Acting County Health Officer, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that write-off of delinquent general accounts receivable totaling $270.96 is AUTHORIZED. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Auditor—Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Health Department Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 2nd day of September 19 75 01 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk 8y Gam„ . Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 - 15-M MaAne M. Ne d ON GENERAL ACCOMUS RECEIVABLE RECOMENDED FOR WIGTE-OFF NAS REASON ARCUDIT Beardsley, M. 06 $ 60.00 Cevallos, G. 09 7.46 Dixon, R. 09 4.00 Ferguson, H. 06 43.20 Fleuti, C. 06 26.Oo Fountain 09 4.00 Fox, K. 06 26.00 Garner, T. 06 20.70 Home Improvements Unlimite 09 7.00 Lazarus, D. 09 8.00 Mesa, C. 09 4.00 Morang, M. 09 7.00 Zamora, E. 06 53.60 TOTAL $ 270.9T �L.cGt� I L a' SEP,5t, 1915 J. L COMM CLM SOAM of sum cm mgr F'' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 1975 In the Matter of Park Dedication Funds. The Board on September 30, 1971 having adopted Ordinance 71-84 providing for the dedication of park land or the collection of fees in lieu thereof, or both, as a condition of approval of residential development; and The County Administrator having this day submitted a memorandum report advising that fees collected under said ordinance total $990,855.87 from the time the ordinance was adopted through July 31 , 1975 and listing dispersrls that have been made of said funds for the benefit of certain agencies in the accomplishment of their projects in the total amount of $406,121 ; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said report is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct-copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Auditor-Controller Wonmy hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Rib'b ie G erreiV tV025l7 H 24 8/75 IOM 00257 H 24 aps loM .. 1.plj . RECEIVED OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �,, Z�4 2 :�5 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1. R0LC .t CLERK 80*RD 0,;SU7i,�Vtr,0;C Administration Building NTS COUTA CO. Martinez, California To: ,Baard !Cif Supervisors Date: August 26, 1975 �Q- ' Arthuk G. Wi11, Fram;r County Administrator Subject: Park Dedication Funds on September 30, 1971 the Board of Supervisors adopted"- ordinance 71-84 providing for the dedication of park land or the collection of fees in lieu thereof, or both, as a condition of approval of residential development. Fees collected under said ordinance total $990,855.87 from the time the ordinance was adopted through July 31, 1975. However, dispersals have been made of said park and dedication funds for the benefit of certain agencies in the accomplishment of their projects. The list of agencies using the funds for projects is as follows. Date Agency Project Amount 4/74 Moraga Park & Recreation Acquisition of 8.44 acre $ 65,000 Authority park site 9/74 Green Valley Recreation Development of existing 3,689 & Park District park site 10/74 Valley Community Acquisition of 10 acre park 24,310 Services District site 2/75 County Service Area R-4 Renovation of community 63,869 Moraga center 2/75 County Service Area R-6 option deposit for commu- 43,572 orinda nity center 3/75 County Service Area R-7 Acquisition of 9.79 acre 155,000 San Ramon Valley park site 5/75 Moraga Park & Recreation Site improvements at commu- 20,000 Authority nity center 6/75 County Service Area R-8 Grading and path instal- 4,542 City of Walnut Creek lation at Larkey Park 7/75 County Service Area Site improvement on school 11,575 LIB-11 Oakley Union property School District 7/75 Kensington Community Tennis court construction at 14,564 Service District existing park Total $406,121 6 fut AA.'wfofi1m_-d w,"t i lioa;d c.—dec r i r r � 4 i a . k 2- y v ' 7 ,s ME The dispersal of. $406. 121 of the -park. and dedication, funds> ym leaves a balance of $584,7;34.87 which will. be utzlrzed for otherL i< , f projects of -benefit to the areas from .which the funds were derivedY N 4 . M x s f � � Fl:eb )25 s +'T } f i P lad` } � t : � s 1 4� 3 p"^i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , i9 75 In the Matter of Aid to Vietnamese Refugees. The County Administrator having submitted a memorandum- report dated September 2, 1975 on interim assistance being provided to Vietnamese refugees under existing aid programs; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said report Is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the. minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency �� this 2nd of 2Rtember 1975 County Auditor-Controller County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By < Deputy Clerk Craig w2b0 H 24 aPS lOM RECEIVED OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR '175 .:_ CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J. ;. a.�;•arr C''1P.K BOARD OF SWIE VI SOSM Administration Building TACO Martinez, California To; Board of. Supervisors /� Date: September 2, 1975 :l b{ From;60unty thur 'G. Will, Subject: Vietnamese Refugee Program Administrator 1 Following the collapse of the Republic of Viet Nam, approxi- mately 131,200 refugees entered the United States. Of this amount, approximately 39,000 refugees will ultimately take up residence in California. On May 23, 1975, President Ford signed into law legislation which will provide Federal funds to assist in the resettlement of the Indo-Chinese refugees and establish -a public assistance program for those people who cannot find jobs. As of August 2, 1975, a total of 143 refugees have applied for public assistance in Contra Costa County. Because we have not . yet received directions regarding the administration of the special assistance program for refugees, interim assistance is being provided under existing aid programs with approximately half the cases and people being aided under the Aid to Families With Dependent Children Program. The current monthly aid cost is approximately $5,800. By the time the County reaches its maximum refugee population (assumed to be approximately 390 persons) and as the various sponsors who are currently providing food, shelter, and orientation to the family refugees find it increasingly difficult to do so, we expect monthly expenditures for the remainder of the fiscal year to approach three times the current level. Social services within the scope of the County plan are also being provided to those refugees who request it. Both the administrative expense (including social services) and the aid payments are expected to be 100 percent Federal reimbursement; however, no definitive instructions regarding claiming these expenses have yet been received by the State of California. The department has been faced with an increasing number of refugees who are applying for assistance who speak little or no English. They have established procedures for hiring translators when needed. MJN:es cc: C. L. Van Marter H. D. Funk �� Clerk of Board Miicrofi1'r;,Zd aoarc{ order A In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Sentember 2 .1.19,15- In .1915-In the Matter of Authorizing Placement of a Dependent Child of the Court On the recommendation of the Director, Human Resources: Agency, the Board hereby AUTHORIZES placement of a dependent child of the court (Court Number 44810) at Chamberlain's Children Center, San Martin, California, at a rate of $1,100.00 per month, effective September 3, 19175. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Director, Human Resources Agency supervisors Social Service ,iced this 2nd day of September 1975 Attn: M. Hallgren J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By %x[41 1 �.r ��/j.G . Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M ;P3 �f Cra; (p) 00 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 1975 In the Matter of Approving Inclusion of Additional Revenue in County Budget, and Fixing County Tax Rates for the 1975-1976 Fiscal Year. On the recommendation of the County Administrator, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that an additional revenue item of $130,000 (sale of real property during the 1975-1976 fiscal year) is APPROVED for inclusion in the County Budget; and In connection therewith, the Board having received a memorandum from the County Auditor-Controller (attached hereto and incorporated herein) indicating the tax levies and the tax rate to be levied on each $100 of assessed value of property within Contra Costa County, required to finance the County Budget for fiscal year 1975-1976 as adopted by the Board on August 27, 1975; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid memorandum is ACKNOWLEDGED, and the County tax rates to be levied for the 1975-1976 fiscal year are hereby FI71ED as listed in the attachment. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Auditor-Controller Supervisors Administrator 19 75 affixed this 2nd doy of September, 2'e7'.'?l J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By = Deputy Clerk ry CrAgg 010263 H 24 8/75 lOM oo263 H 24 BPS 10M x.. r OFFICE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building Martine:, California To: Hoard of Supervisors Dote: September 2, 1975 Arthur G. Will, From: County Admi.nistrapr Subject= Revenue Increase by F. Fernandez ` An additional revenue item of $130,000 for the sale of real property in the 1975-1976 fiscal year should be included in the budget. This item, which will result in an offsetting reduction in property tax requirements, is presented for your approval prior to the levy of taxes and fixing the tax rates. FF:eb P CEIVED SEP ? i975 J. R. OtsSC W CIFAIC BOARD W suPta son e• A CO. (um'264 Miuofiimed,with bogrd order. #i�rt Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Coots County Martinez, California RECEIVED August 29, 1975 SEP a 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors J. a. o N �'� .anus 'WPW i s u FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: County Tax Rate for 1975-76 The County Budget for the fiscal year 1975-76, as adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975, will require the following tax levies: Account Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation General Fund-General Purpose 60,759,226 2.629 -Retirement `v Pension S74,9S9 .025 Total General Fund 61,334,135 2.654 County Superintendent of Schools Fund 500,424 .022 Total County-hide Funds 61,834,649 2.676 County Library Fund 3,411,032 .171 Total, Exclusive of City of Richmond 6S,245,641 2.847 The foregoing tax rates were computed on the following adjusted valuation basis: Secured Roll Unsecured Roll County Assessed Roll 2,121,404,056 160,207,868 State Hoard Assessed Roll-Utility Roll 214,710,160 -0- Total Equalized Net Valuation 2,336;114,216 160,207,868 Less Allowances for: Allocation of Taxes to Various Redevelopment Agencies 19,695,208 1/4 of 1% Cancellations and Adjustments 5,303,510 2% Estimated Delinquencies 3,204,157 Adjusted County-Wide Tax Base 2,311,115,498 157,003,711 Valuation outside of City of Richmond 2,014,678,801 112,219,129 Less allowances for: Allocation of taxes to Various Redevelopment Agencies 13,081,065 Adjustr..ents and Delinauencies 4,554,433 2,244,383 Adjusted County Library Tax Base 2,001,043,303 109,974,746 The duty of your Board of levy property taxes to finance the County Budget is set forth in Section 29120 of the Government Code. 0025 IiDF/CDT:dc Microfilmed with board order __ ai ' F r l � i In :the Boardr of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 # 1975 In the Matter of Fixing Tax Rates for County Districts and Service Areas, School Districts, Other Districts Governed by Local Boards, and Other Agencies Collecting Taxes on the County Tax Rolls. The Board having received from the County Auditor- Controller lists of tax rates for the 1975-1976 fiscal year (attached hereto and incorporated herein) to be levied on each $100-W assessed value of property for county districts and service areas, school districts and special school programs, other districts governed by local boards and other agencies collecting taxes on the county tax rolls; and IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of aforesaid lists is ACKNOWLEDGED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the- tax rates for the 1975-1976 fiscal year are hereby FIXED as listed in the attachments. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: County Auditor—Controller Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk Deputy Clerk M Craig H 24 8/75 101A ir) > Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Q••_ Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 RECEIVED ECEI ED TO: Board of Supervisors S'LP,•� 1975 J. L OLSM FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-ControllerOF sum A CO6T SUBJECT: County Fire Protection District Tax Rates for 1975-76 The County Fire Protection Districts' budgets for 1975-76 as adopted by your Board on July 28, 1975 will require the following secured tax .levies and rates: Amount Required Pates per $100 of Total on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Rate Bethel Island - General Purpose 50,627 .609 Retirement & Pension 2,540 .031 .640 Brentwood 53,216 .212 .212 Byron 20,103 .149 .149 Contra Costa - General Purpose 6,578,849 .669 Retirement $ Pension 569,923 .059 .728 Crockett-Carquinez 43,776 .279 .279 Eastern - General Purpose 50,957 .806 Retirement $ Pension S,202 .083 Loan Repayment 1,771 .029 .918 El Sobrante - General Purpose 614,359 .665 Retirement G Pension 67,226 .073 .738 tioraga - General Purpose 647,240 .827 Retirement v Pension 87,239 .112 .939 Oakley 49,205 .294 .294 Orinda - General Purpose 835,523 1.024 Retirement & Pension 104,898 .229 1.153 Pinole 93,512 .738 .738 River - General Purpose 2,405,546 .603 Retirement & Pension 249,554 .063 .666 Tassajara 13,881 .395 .395 The duty of your Board to levy taxes for these districts is set forth in Section 13907 of the Health and Safety Code. HDF/SK.-kt AMaofitmed with board-order..' Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Punk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: County Service Areas' Tax Rate for 1975-76 L The 1975-76 budgets of Service Areas, officially adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975 require the following secured tax levies and rates: Amount Required Rate per $100.of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Count► Service Area. - Fire: Area F-1, Bay View 4,122 .953 County Service Area - Police: Area P-1, Crockett-Valona 9,336 .084 Area P-2, Danville-Alamo 83,803 .072 Area P-4, Orinda 73,028 .079 Area P-5, Round Hill Area 37,501 .465 Miscellaneous Service Areas: M-1, Delta Ferry 20,487 1.926 M-3, Rollingaood 7,163 .172 M-4, San Ramon 49,481 .150 M-6, Danville 21,134 .265 M-7, 140. Richmond 8,219 .163" M-8, Byron 23,546 .500 11-9, Orinda 938 .050 M-11, Orinda 26,429 .535 1.I-12, £1 Sobrante 8,934 .763 W15, Bethel Island 327 .359 M-14, Clayton 3,222 .100 M-15, Ygnacio Valley 1,743 .100 M-16, Clyde Area 2,836 .326 M-17, ?Iontalvin Manor 51,975 .278 W18, Moraga Area -- -- W19, Orinda Area 10,262 .400 W20, Rodeo Area 6,314 .250 M-21, Danville Station Subd. 6,393 •250 xfin yv268 3 -2- Board of Supervisors ' County Service Areas' Tax Rates for 1975-76 Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Library Service Areas: LIB 2, E1 Sobrante 28,314 .100 LIB 10, Pinole 87,137 .150 LIB 12, Moraga -- - LIB 13, Ygnacio Valley -- -- Lighting Service Areas: L-32, Kensington 20,529 .102 L-41, West County 65,376 .145 L-42, No. Central County 28,314 .127 L-43, W. Pittsburg 35,903 .177 L-45, South Central County SS,711 .083 L-46, Northwest County 30,592 .152 County Service Area - Recreation: Area R-4, Moraga 3,706 .250 Area R-5, South Danville 8,432 .206 Area R-6, Orinda 91,624 .100 Area R-7, Alamo-Danville 349,320 .250 Area R-8, Walnut Creel: Area 108,388 .035 Area R-9, El Sobrante -- -- County Service Area - Road Maintenance Area RD-1, Nuir Oaks 768 .091 Area RD-4, Bethel Island Area 3,166 1.000 County Service Area - Drainage Area D-12, Sandnound -- -- The duty of your board to make these levies is set forth in Section 25210.44, 25210.54, 25210.65, 25210.75,. and 25210.78e of the Government Code. 1MF/SK:I:t O c6I 'r Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT• Flood Control Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The 1975-76 budgets of Flood Control Districts, officially adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975 require the following secured tax levies and rates: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation 520,246 .020 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 1 63,997 .180 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 3B 1,323,118 .130 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 7 43,011 .140 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 8 6,273 .050 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 8A 11,116 .110 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 9 3,010 .010 Contra Costa County Flood Control Zone 9A 2,837 .010 The duty of your Board to make these levies is set forth in Act. 1661, Section 12 and 17 of the General Laws. HDF/SR:dc 0046P70 0 S Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Storm Drainage Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The 1975-76 budgets of Storm Drainage Districts, officially adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975 require the following secured tax levies and rates: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Contra Costa Storm Drainage District Zone 10 63,473 .350 Contra Costa Storm Drainage District Zone 13 38,956 .250 Contra Costa Storm Drainage District Zone 16 17,868 .134 - Zone-;7 -- -- The duty of your Board to make these levies is set forth in Chapter 1532 Statutes of 1953. Section 19. HDF/SK:dc 00V • Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Storm Drain Maintenance Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The 1975-76 budgets of Storm Drain Maintenance Districts, officially adopted by your board on August 27, 1975 require the following secured . tax levies and rates: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Storm Drain Wce District #1 131,247 .230 Storm Drain Mtce District 94 9,692 .040 The duty of your Board to make these levies is set forth in Act 2208, Section 7 of the General Laws. HDF/SK:dc 00272 , 7 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 197S TO: Board of Sunervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Sanitation District Tax Rate of 197S-76 The 197S-76 budgets of Sanitation Districts, officially adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975 require the following secured tax levies and rates: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation ` Sanitation District 7A 18S,790 1.000 -Sanitation n__tTict •r The duty of your Board to make these levies is set forth in Section 4747 of the Health and Safety Code. HDF/SK:dc W273, Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: County Special District Bond Issues Tax Rates for 1975-76 In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandates contained in the various laws under which bond proceedings Were conducted, the following tax rates should be levied by your Board for 1975-76 to meet the accruing charges of the following County special district bond issues: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Oakley Fire 1,868 .007 Orinda Fire 1965 Issue 29,495 .037 Storm Drainage District 916 9,509 .072 ' Sanitation District #7A, Improvement District #1 16,669 .100 Sanitation District #78 ___ Sanitation District #15 ___ County Service Area P-8 564,454 .183 liDF/Sl::kt W274 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: County Eater Agency District Tax Rate for 1975-76 The Contra Costa County Water Agency District budget for 197S-76 as adopted by your Board on August 27, 1975 will require the secured tax levy and rate as shown. Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed'traluation Contra Costa County {dater Agency 102,609 .004' The duty of your Board to levy the above tax for this district is set forth in provisions of Chapter S18 Statutes of 1957. HDF/SK:kt .,i 751"> looms I Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinea, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk:, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: High School Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 On the basis of budgets submitted by the Board of School Trustees and approved by the Superintendent of Schools and in accordance with the mandate of Section 20705 of the Education Code, the following high school district- tax levies should be made by your Board for the year 1975-76. - Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Acalanes Union 9,656,783 2.213 Liberty Union 1,543,006 2.394 RDF/SK:kt u Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1075 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: High School Districts Bond Interest and Redemption Tax Rates In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in Section 22101 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following tax levies for 1075-76 to meet accruing charges of the following high school districts' bond issues: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Acalanes #SA, 6B 47,281 .011 Acalanes #6C, 6D 59,506 .015 Acalanes #6E-8B 556,851 .134 Acalanes #SC-SD 152,630 .035 Alhambra 06A-6D 96,095 ..074: ` Liberty #lA-D 3,656 .006 Liberty #lE-2D 118,465 .184 Richmond #3, 4 15,1,030 .026 Richmond #5 602,295 .100 San Ramon 25,027 .012 11DF/SK:dc Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra•Cost& County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO.. Board of Supervisors FROM; H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT. Area-Wide Elementary School Tax Levy ron-Unified Districts, 1975-76 a Under the provisions of Education Code Section 20911, itis:necessary to levy an area-wide elementary school tax levy within the following high; school'. districts: Amount Required Rate per $100 of " on Secured Roll Assessed*Valuation. Acalanes High School Area 4,455,179 1.021' Liberty High School Area 653,2;4 1.014 HDF/SK•dc 00278>' .f s Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa. County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO. Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Unified School Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 On the basis of budgets submitted by the Board of School Trustees and approved by the Superintendent of Schools and in accordance with the mandate of Section 2070S of the Education Code, the following School District' tax levies should be made by your Board for the year 1975-76. Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured'Roll Assessed Valuation Antioch Unified 7,699,614 4.209 John Swett Unified 2,272,206 2.594` Mt. Diablo Unified 30,513,777 4.787 Pittsburg Unified 8,386,059 4.264, Pittsburg Unified-Child Center 113,950 .058 Martinez Unified 5,276,461 4.064. Richmond Unified 32,792,766 5.427 Richmond Unified-Childrens Center 575,223 .096 San Ramon Unified 12,375,401 5.616 HDF/SK:dc 7 j { Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra- Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 197S TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Unified School Districts Bond Interest and Redemption Tax Rates for 197S-76 In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in , Section 22101 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following tax levies for 1975-76 to meet accruing charges of the following unified school district bond issues: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Antioch Issue 2-4D 231,113 .128 Antioch Issue 5-7B 673,393 .369 Alt. Diablo Unified 2,5372314 .39S Pittsburg Unified 676,S59 .344 Richmond Unified lA-1C 446,383 .074 San Ramon Unified (including component elementary) 1,429,984 .649 I1DF/SK:dc 00280 i " Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Elementary School District Bond Interest and Redemption Tax Rates for 1975-76 In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandate contained in Section 22101 of the Education Code, your Board should make the following tax levies for 1975-76 to meet accruing charges of the following elementary school district bond issues: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Rol:l Assessed Valuation Alamo 10,715 .0110, Brentwood 52,303 .238 Canyon --- Danville 74,536 .039 Knightsen 3,452 .051 Lafayette 129,975 .111 Alartinez 52,577 .047 Moraga 215,599 .331 Oakley 49,275 .238 Orinda 6-98 43,552 .047 Orinda SE, 9C-10C 114,922 .128 Pinole-Hercules 125,280 .119 Richmond S-6G 89,946 .022 Richmond 6H-I 21,911 .006 San Pablo 52,098 .078 San Ramon 15,361 ..021 Sheldon 26,038 .119 Vine bill 6,743 .038 Walnut Creek 74,009 .047 IMF/SK:dc Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa-County Martinez, California Sertember2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Elementary School Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 On the basis of budgets submitted by the boards of school. trustees and approved by the Superintendent of Schools and in accordance with the mandate of Section 20705 of the Education Code, the following elementary school district tax levies should be made by your Board for the year 1975-76. Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Brentwood 321,250 1.443 Byron 167,172 1.1s0 Canyon 9,877 2.085 Knightsen 146,231 1.542 Lafayette 2,308,872 2.383 Moraga 1,230,599 1.890 Oakley 296,374 1.427. Orinda 2,760,790 2.992 Walnut Creek 3,223,556 2.011 HDF/SK:kt Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa'County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Community College District Tax Rate 1975-76 On the basis of the budget submitted by the Board of Trustees of ; the Contra Costa Community College District and approved by the County. Super- intendent of Schools and in compliance with the mandate contained in Section 20705 the following Community College Tax Levy should be made by your Board for the year 1975-76. Amount Required Rate per $10D of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Contra Costa Community College District 18,688,335 .727 RDF/SK:kt Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Coati County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Special School I.evies for 1975-76 The following special school levies are provided under the noted Education Code sections.- amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Sections 6954 and 6955 Provides for tax required for education of children who reside in a children's institution. The County of residence shall pay to the district educating such children the actual cost of education. Tax to be levied on total County valuation. Education of Children in Institutions 1,041,542 .041 Section 7456 Provides that the Board of Super- visors may levy a County-wide tax for Regional Occupational Centers maintained by County Superintendent of Schools. Regional Occupational Centers 199,269 .003 Section 395.7 Provides for tax required for educa- tion of severely mentally retarded minors in schools maintained by County Superintendent of Schools. Tax to be levied on assessed valuation within Richmond Unified School District. Education of Severely Mentally Retarded 486,317 .081 00284 .1 �+uiN fir,, Hoard of Supervisors September 2, 1975 Special School Levies for 1975-76 Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Section 395.8 Provides for County tax for identi- fication and education of physically handicapped minors who come within the provisions of Section 6801 or 6S02. Tax to be levied on all school districts within the County except Alameda County Joint School District. Education of Physically Handicapped Minors 33,940 .002 Section 16645.9 Provides for maintenance of develop- ment centers for handicapped minors. Tax to be levied on all school dis- tricts within the County except Alameda County Joint School Districts. Maintenance of nevelopment Centers for Handicapped Minors 145,570 .006 Section 17263.1 Provides for levy of County tax to offset decrease in equalization aid and supplemental aid. Tax to be levied on all assessed valuation with the County. Equalization Aid -- Sections 20450(e) (5) and 20454 Provides for County tax for operation of Juvenile Court Schools. Tax to be levied on all assessed valuation within the Countv. Juvenile Court Schools 395,233 .016 00285 1A -3- Board of Supervisors September.2,.'I975 - Special School Levies for- 197S-76 Amount Required Rate per $100:of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Section 20454 Provides for capital outlay require- ments. Tax to be levied on all school districts within the County - except RichmonO Unified and Alameda County Joint School Districts. Capital Outlay Requirements 119,720 .007 Sections 7038a and 7038b Provides for operation of Special Education Master Plan programs. Taxes. to be levied on all school districts within the County except .Alameda County Joint School Districts for Section7038a and all school districts within the County except Mt. Diablo Unified, Richmond Unified and Alameda County Joint School Districts for 7033b. Master Plan Programs (7038x) 330,467 .013 MasterPlanPrograms (7038b) 1,73S,626 .132 HDF/SK:dc OQ28 , Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Transit Districts and Air_Pollution Control District Tax Rates for 1975-76 Certification received from the governing bodies of the inter-county districts listed below call for a 1975-76 levy in their behalf at the following rates: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District Special District #1 2,432,946 .453 Levy required under provisions of Section 259000, Public Utility Code San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 11,627,512 .447 Levy required under provisions of Section 29128, Public Utility Code Bay Area Air Pollution Control District 367,234 .015 Levy required under Provisions of Section 24370.3, Health $ Safety Code HDF/SK:dc 0028 r Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 �-r Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT- East Bay !Municipal Utility District Tax Rate for 1975-76 Certification received from the governing body of the East Bay Municipal Utility District calls for 1975-76 levies in their behalf at the following rates. _ Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation East Bay Municipal Utility District 1,909,412 .136 East Bay Municipal Utility District it 75,247 .067 HDF/SK:dc aU28g. 18 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District Tax Rate for 1975-76 The Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District has certified to the County the amount of 148,300 as their budget requirement ,for 1975-76. Under the provisions of Section 181, A.B. 068, Statutes of. 1960, it is the duty of your board to levy a tax rate of$2.000 per $100.00 on the secured assessed valuation within the district. HDF/SK:dc 00289 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: East Bay Regional Park Districts' Tax Rate for 1975-76 Under the provisions of Section SS4S of the Public Resources Code, the East Bay Regional Park District has made tax levy and rate within Contra Costa County as shown. Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation East Bay Regional Park District 502,106 .198 The duty of your Board to levy this tax on all property within the district in this county is contained in Section 5571 of the Public Resources Code. HDFJSK:dc 00290 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Cemetery Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The certifications of requirements for the year 1975-76,made-by the governing boards of the Cemetery Districts show the, following.tax levies and rates necessary: Amount Required. Rate per.$100' of on Secured Roll' Assessed':Yaluation: Alamo-Lafayette 13,997 .004 " Byron-Brentwood-Knightsen Union 25,541 .047 The duty of your Board to make this levy is set forth in Section 8980 of the Health and Safety Code. HDF/SK:dc 00/Ga71 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 197S TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Recreation and Park Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The certifications of requirements for the year 1975-76 made by. the Board of Trustees of the Recreation and Park Districts show the. following tax levies and rates necessary: Amount RequiredRate per. $100 of on Secured;Roll Assessed Valuation- Ambrose 101,176 .500 Brentwood 13,914 .151 Green Valley 5,280 `.176 Pleasant Hill 587,829 588 Pleasant Hill Debt Area 81 18 .001 Rollingwood-Wilart Park 9,595 .231' The duty of your board to make these levies is set forth in Section S784.5 of the Public Resources Code. HDFJSR:dc X002 s Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Hospital Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The certification of tax requirements fortheyear, 1975-76,'-,made.. by the Board of Directors of the Hospital Districts show the following�taz levies and rates necessary. Amount Required Rat& per, $100-of" on Secured Roll Assessed-Valuation, Mt. Diablo 1,009,891 .226 Los Medanos 462,284 .200. West Contra Costa 1,074,125 .162 The duty of your board to make this levy is set forth in.Section 32202 of the Health and Safety Code. HDFJSK:dc W293 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM:• H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Mosquito Abatement Districts" Tax Rate for 197S-76 The certifications made to this office by the governing boards of the Mosquito Abatement Districts indicate that it will be necessary,to r make the following tax levies and rates for the fiscal year 197S-76` Amount. R squired Rate: ger $100 0"'1 ,Y on>Secured Roll Assessed- Valuation Contra Costa tl 472,S74 :019 Diablo Valley 72,200 .126 The duty of your board to make this levy is set forth in Section 2302 of the Health and Safety Code. HDF/SK:dc ; R; • �291 N WN g% - a yD' Office of . COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: County Water DistrictsTax Rates for 1975-76 The certifications of tax requirements for the year 1975-76 made by the Board of Directors of the County Water Districts show the following tax levies and rates necessary. Amount Required Rate per $Iw of on Secured Roll Assessed,Valuation Castle Rock 2,417 .374 Crockett-Valona 500 .009 The requirements as determined by the County Auditor-Controller-for the dissolved San Ramon Valley Water District will require the tax levy and rate as shown. Amount Required Rate per $100 of.; on Secured Roll Assessed'Valuation El Sobrante 14,572 1.359 San Ramon Valley 1,746 .002 The duty of your board to levy this tax is contained in Section 31702 of the Enter Code. HDF/SK:dc 0029; Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Sanitary Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 The governing boards of the following Sanitary Districts have elected to make use of the County assessment rolls and tax collections procedures and have fixed the following tax rates for the fiscal year of 1975-76. Amount Required Rate ,per $100 of: on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation" Byron 6,OS3 1.000 Central Contra Costa 4,940,314 :SSO Crockett-Valona S8,4S4 1.000 tit. View 124,076 .250 Oakley 16,511 .400 Rodeo 108,380 1.000 San Pablo 782,153 .570 Stege 190,905 .170 HDF/SK:dc oo . Office of Y COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER r .,z Contra Cotta County =r Martinez, California September 2, 1975 r; TO: Board of Supervisors -Y a� FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller s�^ �a SUBJECT: Valley Community Services Districts' Tax Rates for, 1975-76' f: Certification received from-Valley Community Services.District requires 1975-76 tax levies and rates as follows: Amount Required Rate per, SI00'of' on Secured Roll Assessed-Valuation Valley 468,509 1.349: Valley Improvement District #I 88,562 .255 The dutyof your board to I + . evythis-tax raft on the rtion�of this district within Contra Costa County is set forth in Sections:617SS and+ 617S7,, of the Government Code. > HDF/SK:dc Wm^, 4 " N Office.at COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Community Services Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76; . Certification received from Community Services Districts within, . this county require 1975-76 tax levies and rates as follows: Amount Required, Rate per:$100 of, . on Secured Roll Assesse&Valuation Diablo 27,605 58Q Kensington 262,114 , 1:296. The duty of your board to levy'this tax rate on. the portion of this district within Contra Costa County is set forth' in Sections 61755 and '62757� of the Government Code. HDF/SK:dc ------------ �V Office of r COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County ' Martinez, California September 2,1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Resource Conservation Districts' Assessment Levy for 1975-76 Certifications made by the Board of Directors of the Resource Conservation Districts calls for 1975-76 levy on the assessed`value'of` land. within the district as follows: Amount Required Rate.per, $100,of on Secured Roll Assessed.Valuation" Contra Costa Resource Conservation 44,SSS .007>' The duty of your board to levy this assessment on the assessed value of lands within the districts is contained in Section 9366 of the Public Resource Code. HDF/SK:dc 3S r Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Casta County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Local Fire Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 On the basis of certifications made by their respective board of commissioners, the following fire districts will require 197S-76 levies and. rates as indicated. Amount.Required Rate per $100 of Total. '. on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Rate Danville - General Purpose 1,IS4,667 ;953 Retirement & Pension 131,275 .109 1.062 Kensington - General Purpose 320,582 1.585 Retirement $ Pension 38,582 .191 State Compensation Insurance 10,893 .054 1:830: Rodeo - General Purpose 259,430 .911 Retirement 6 Pension 27,747 .098 Loan Repayment 7,347 .026 L 03S San Ramon - General Purpose 293,461 .711 Retirement $ Pension 29,906 .073 Loan Repayment 9,710 .024 80& San Ramon - Zone 1 14,924 .200 .200 The duty of your board to levy taxes for these districts is set forth in Section 13907 of the Health and Safety Code. HDF/SK:dc 00300 34' Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Local Special District Bond Issues and Debt Service Tax Rates for 1975-76 In accordance with the terms of issue and the mandates contained in the various laws under which debt and bond proceedings were conducted, the following tax levies should be made by your Board for 1975-76 to meet the accruing charges of the following local special district bond issues and debt service requirements: Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Fire Protection Districts: Kensington 32,866 .,163 Sanitary Districts: Byron 2,173 .360 Central #1 86,492 .010 Central 02 449,056 .050 Crockett-Valona 15,535 .266 Oakley 911 .023 Rodeo 83,391 .770 San Pablo 31,900 .024 San Pablo 1974 296,400 .216 Stege 110,327 .099 Hospital Districts: Concord 110,893 .021 Mt. Diablo Debt Service Area 21,947 .022 Recreation and Park Districts: Pleasant Hill 113,446 .116 Rollingwood-Wilart 2,115 .049 -Dater Districts: Castle Rock 4,849 .751 Crockett-Valona 49,940 .838 Gregory Gardens 45,176 .324 San Miguel Estates 4,939 .268 San Ramon Valley 246,862 .175 Walnut 8,509 .158 OW01 C rg yy44P �n u1 Yf t g s e _<t $^" .P 'gid' r'*" �r. +f' 4k '� J I t 80ard 'O SupennSOrs r .ya ga Yr ! Local Special District Bond Issues and�Debt Service Tax Rates r F #,q for '1975-.76 ,� 4 3 f�_`6p "y f !V $ d N f S Rl wt' I.? ,,,,k . �` a n `fie, �'� a w' ,�...._.. �� i n� "' 4 :Amount Requued Rate p2"Q0 o� t ; p .y ,� d,. �'k r'4� ,. on Secu�ced Ro12� Asse11 ssedlFaluation �� " a r a o..t � r"fis� 9Y-i,$''` .. i x � m e I st riuriicpal -Imyrovement nistricts ' m �� 1 :Bethel Island ZS,Q28 'P.. , , � # ;," �, �� w a r x �� r c f}� �F III' �F - M ,P7J-rf+g HDF S�. do �� : a p S 1 J d 45��`� f"y fL { y" 4 1. I� & A' "fyi'.t 8 _� K* ,� irr dam, .... f'k,�,,�,., -, ,-,�,- , -, . I W,�ii � .1, '. , -, , t�__ - - ,'y " i+y'a+FF Y � } �Y ,r. 'Ofia'ix 9x „_ r 'cf mss`ncF,r! --- 13 r � ', �`i' �w c t7,1� o* 'la.7aS xa 14. W-� a{`sd5t _ reIi #{�?� n s> 1� 1 .11 M fN� k kw.�, �Z K� i �.,�y�,.( ,� 4 I s i7 t�' k'-f �+ f mow'' r $ t r '�+ 2�'4 '�' �FINVIX_—11 E In 3 f .�,�� _ fk,- E z rok yk s . �.. g rkXri.,,gFlMZA .sl ¢ y $ W. ,, d w 4t T"r +`f.5i s - {; .� ,k'w hr's.{j.4Y -C 'Y 1'{^ 14�q f I I S} t ,. 4 ,v1. "It,} A 1Ii -11, y} ._ _ FxtON . - - . o- ', �'.:- X41 P f, K. yyyy t E � , 'Ff A , . a # a K A.r f x +, '1` ' ' . I ._ �ht�c 11: t skfk = y n { �tx e�> ✓p.. -ii rte->_ z _ t y ns . . �a y w^yI 11: y 5 WON 11 1.. 4y. { .tom! .5+.oy. 'w11 n f 'z» i dh✓'>t`"�K'^",.i s^Ys, ,^,�,v .S,�l ah ,. 9 a< 11 Office of COUNTY AUDITOR - CON TROLLER , Contrat Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 . a. } TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller ,rte: a, SUBJECT: Joint -Union School Districts' Tax Rates for 1975-76 On the basis of tax rates submitted to this County by the County of Alameda, the following taxes are to be levied on property within this County in the following Joint School Districts: Amount Required Rate per $100 of`. Total on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Rate Amador Joint Union High - General 6,382 2.292 2.292 .Amador Joint Union high - Bond 1,130 .406 .406 Livermore Joint Unified - General 43,594 5.669 5.669 Livermore Joint Unified - Bond 2,991 .389 .389' Pleasanton Joint Elementary - General 5,164 1.855 1.855 ' Pleasanton Joint Elementary - Bond 1,066 .383 .383 South County Jt. Community College - General 6,284 .600 .600 South County Jt. Community College - Bond 649 .062 .062 . Elementary School Area-Nide Tax Levy Amador High School Area 2,823 1.014 1.014 Development Center for handicapped Minors 178 .017 .017 Education Physically Handicapped 723 .069 .069; Education of Trainable Mentally Retarded Minors 251 .024 Capital Outlay 377 .036 Trainable Mentally Retarded - Physically Handicapped Audio Visual 42 .004 Tuition Trainable Mentally Retarded - Physically handicapped 146 .014 .078 The duty of your board to make these levies is set forth in Sections 89S.7, S95.8, 16645.9, 20454, 20455, 2070S, 20911 and 22101 of the Education Code. HDF/SK:dc Office of COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra•Costa County Martinez, California September 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Discovery Bay Reclamation and Drainage Maintenance District Tax Rate for 197S-76 Certification received from the Reclamation and Drainage Maintenance District calls for 1975-76 levy on the taxable land within thedistrictas shown. Amount RequiredRate per $1. 'of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation- Discovery Bay Reclamation and Drainage bIaintenance District 14,3S4 .500 The duty of your Board to levy this assessment on the taxable land within the district is contained in Section S1362 and 51366 of the Water'Code. HDF/SK:dc 003 ; Office of • COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Contra•Costa County Martinez, California Sentemher 2, 1975 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: 11. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller SUBJECT: Reclamation District No. 800 Tax Rate for 1975-76 Certification received from the Reclamation and Drainage Maintenance District calls for 1975-76 levy on the taxable land within the district as shown. Amount Required Rate per $100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuation Reclamation District 800 47,775 1.000 The duty of your Board to levy this assessment on the taxable land within the district is contained in Section 51362 and 51366 of the Water Code. IIDF/SK:dc COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA OFFICE OP AUDITOR-CONTROLLER DISTRICTS GOVF.RN'ED BY LOCAL BOARDS AIND OTHER AGENCIES COLLECTING TAXES ON COUNTY TAX POLLS Cormarison of 1974-75 and 1975-76 Tax Rates 1974-75 1975-76 Tax Rates Tax Rates Operating Debt Operating Debt Funds Service Funds Service. TIRE DISTRICTS Danville 1.182 1.062` Kensington 1.713 .138 1.830 .163 Rodeo 1.051 1.035 San Ramon .809 .803 San Ramon Zone 1 .184 .200 RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Contra Costa .009 .007 ,.1OSQUIT0 ABATEMENT.DISTRICT Central Contra Costa .025 .019 Diablo Valley .072 .126 SANITARY DISTRICTS Byron 1.000 .422 1.000 Central Contra Costa .SSO .550 Central Issue #1 .012 .010 Central Issue #2 .055 .050 . Crockett-Valona 1.000 .298 1.000 .266 Mt. View .170 .250 Oakley .300 .029 .400 Rodeo 1.000 .760 1.000 .770 San Pablo .610 .24S .570 .388�•Z Stege .170 .113 .170 .099 11OSPITAL DISTRICTS Mt. Diablo .190 .024 .226 .021 Alt. Diablo Debt Service Area .02S .022 Los Medanos .200 .200 West Contra Costa .198 .162 CEMETERY DISTRICTS Alamo-Lafayette .013 .004 Byron-Brentwood-Knightsen Union .067 .047 PARK, RECREATION &ND PARKWAY Ambrose .450 .500 Brentwood .313 .151 Green Vallev .379 .176 Pleasant Hill .S79 .12S .588 .116 Pleasant Hili Debt Area 11 .001 .001: ' Rollingwood-Wilart Park .223 .054 .231 .049 REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT East Bay .194 .198 O03VV' Comparison of 1971-75 and 1975-76 Tax Rates 1974-75 1975-76 Tax Rates Tax Rates Operating Debt Operating Debt Funds Service Funds Service AUNICIPAL IMPROVEWWArT DISTRICT Bethel Island 2.000 .SGS 2.000 .460 COUNTY WATER DISTRICTS Castle Rock Water .35S .832 .374 .7S1 Crockett-Valona -- .942 .009 .838 E1 Sobrante 1.720 1.359 Gregory Gardens Tater .362 .324 San Miguel Estates .31S .268 , San Ramon Valley .003 .199 .002 .175 Walnut .161 .158 ;;ONR,PJNITY SERVICE DISTRICT (JOINT} Valley .967 1.349 Valley District #1 .307 .255 VUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT East Bay .14S .136 East Bay District #1 .067 .067 TRANSIT DISTRICTS Alameda - Contra Costa .513 .453 San Francisco - Bay Area Rapid .048 .464 ,047 .400 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Bay Area .016 .015 COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT Diablo .S80 .580 Kensington 1.270 1.296 JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICTS Amador Joint High 2.225 ..299 2.292 .406 Livermore Joint Unified 4.789 .427 5.669 .389 Pleasanton Joint Elementary 1.761 .406 I.85S .383` South County Joint Community College .604 .068 .600 .062 Elementary School Areawide Tax Amador High Area 1.007 1.014 Handicapped Minor Center .019 .017 Education Physically Handicapped - Elem. .038 .069 Education Physically liandicapped - Sec. -- -- Education Trainable Mentally Retarded Minors .OS2 .073 rLENIF.NTTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTS Brentwood 1.221 .278 1.443 .238 Byron 1.143 -- 1.150 -- Canyon .871 .106 2.085 -- Knightsen 1.637 .060 1.542 .0S1 Lafayette 2.223 .133 2.383 .111 Moraga 1.847 .291 1.390 .331 -2- F ... f '._ `� Comparison or 1174-75 and 1975-76 Tax Pates 1974-75 197S-76 Comparison of 1974-75 and 1975-76 Tax Rates 1974-75 1975-76 Tax Rates Tax Rates Operating Debt Operating Debt Funds Service Funds Service' ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICTS (continued) Oakley 1.745 .282 1.427 .238 Orinda 2.213 2.992 Issue 6-9B .059 .047' Issue 9C-10C .132 , .128 Walnut Creek 2.003 .056 2.011 .047 i1IGH SCHOOL DISTRICTS Acalanes 2.036 2.213 Issue SA-6B .019 Issue 6C-6D .015 .015 Issue 6E-8B .139 .134 Issue 8C .039 .035 Liberty 2.235 2.394 Issue IA-D .009 .006_ Issue 1E-2D .216 .184: UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS Antioch 4.336 4.209 Issue 2-4D .153 .128 Issue S-7A .436 .369, John Swett 3.075 2.594 Martinez 4.223 4,064 Component Districts Alhambra High Issue #6 .092 .074 Martinez Elementary .089 .047 Vine Hill Elementary .058 .033 Mt. Diablo 5.022 .669 4.787 .395: Pittsburg 4.596 .494 4.264 .344 Children's Center .051 .058 Richmond 5.786 5.427 Richmond #lA-1C .089 .074 Component Districts Richmond High #3-4 .039 .026 Richmond High #5 .121 .100 Pinole-Hercules .134 .119 Richmond Elem. 5-6G .025 .022 Richmond Elem. 6I1-I .008 .006 San Pablo .107 .078 Sheldon .120 .119 Children's Center .021 .096 San Ramon 5.287 .875 5.616 .649` Component Districts Alamo 74 .034 .018 Danville 74 .130 .089 San Ramon 74 .035 .021 San Ramon High 74 .018 .012 CONTRA COSTA CO*LWITY COLLEGE .805 .727 -3- Comparison of 1974-75 and 1975-76 Tax Rates 1974=7S 1975-76 Tax Rates Tax Rates Operating Debt Operating Debt Funds Service Funds Service - SPECIAL SCHOOL LEVY Elem. School Areawide Tax Acalanes High Area 1.009 1.02E Liberty High Area 1.023 1.014 Regional Occupational Centers .004 .008 Educ. Severely Mentally Retarded Minors .049 .081 Physically Handicapped Minors .054 .002 Children in Institutions .025 .041 Development of Centers for Handicapped Minors .015 .006 Equalization Aid Offset .030 -- Juvenile Hall .018 .016 (Continued Page S) CITIES Antioch 2.089 1.209 Brentwood 1.770 1.770 Clayton 1.000 1.000 Lighting Maintenance #1 .260 .200 Concord 1.170 1.190 Kirkwood Maintenance 1 .443 .238 Balhan Terrace St. Lighting Mtce. .302 E1 Cerrito 2.095 2.23S Hercules 1.000 1.000 Lafayette Lighting Mtce. District Zone #1 .090 .030 Lighting Mtce. District Zone #2 .240 .240 Lighting Mtce. District Zone #3 .090 .090 Lighting Mtce. District Zone #4 .050 .050 Lighting Mtce. District Zone #S .030 .030 Lighting Mtce. District Zone #6 .250 .200 Core Area District .200 .200. Martinez 1.970 1.870 Parking District Al .750 .750- Moraga .SIO Lighting Maintenance .094 Pinole 1.930 1.923 Pittsburg 2.985 2.135 Parking District #1 .500 .S007 - Pleasant Hill Unified Lighting Mtce. District #1 .4S0 .350 Diablo Vista Eater Mtce. District .850 .850 Richmond Tax District 1 3.120 3.100 Richmond Tax District 3 2.950 2.930 Richmond Tax District 5 3.070 3.050 Richmond Tax District 6 2.910 2.890 San Pablo 1.180 .010 1.190 Walnut Creek 1.090 1.030 COUNTY EATER DISTRICTS (Tax Rate determined by District) Contra Costa County .OS9 .071 Contra Costa County Improvement District 1 .093 .093 Contra Costa County Improvement District 2 1.000 1.000 -4- ul ,. ' Comparison of 1974-7S and: 197S-76 Tax Rates... 1074-75 ,�. 1375-76; t Tax Rates Tax Rates .. . Operating Debt° Operating Debt Funds Service Funds Service RECLAMATION AR'D DRAINAGE ANCE Discovery Say .500 .500: Reclamation District 800 1.000 1.000 '1P . ECIAL .SCHOOL LEVY (Continucd) Capital Outlay .00? Special Educ Master Plan L-C 7038a .0I3 Special Educ Master Plan EC '7038b .I32 ,. tt be 31 zj k.' 1 ' w In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Molter of Establishing the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging. This Board on May 20, 1975 having designated itself as the Contra Costa County Area Agency on Aging in accordance with the Older Americans Act of 1965, having established the Contra Costa County Office on Aging, and having delegated to the Director, Human Resources Agency, the responsibility for administering the Area Agency; and The Board on June 17, 1975 having endorsed an interim plan (presented by the Human Resources Agency) for the Area Agency on Aging and having directed that the final plan be prepared for this Board's approval and for submission to the State Office on Aging prior to October 1, 1975; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging is ESTABLISHED to assist in completing the 1975-1976 Plan for the Area Agency on Aging, with the understanding that the Council's constitution and bylaws shall be approved by County Counsel and by this Board; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FDRTHER ORDERED that the aforesaid Advisory Council shall be composed of those persons listed on the attached Exhibit A. who shall nerve three-year terms, the terms to be staggered by drawing of lots. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Committee Members Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director, Human Resources Supervisors Agency affixed this 2nd day of September, lq 75 Attn: Contracts Adm. — Social Service _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Auditor-Controller By /� , ,� Deputy Clerk County Counsel Deputy County Administrator 00013 1 H 24 8/75 10M ADVISONY COUNCIL ON AGING Mrs. Agnes L. Bardin Mrs. Mary H. McDonald 21 Inverness Ct. 1702 Estudillo Street San Ramon, CA 94583 Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: 828-0214 Telephone: 228-3243 Mr. Cleophas Brown Mrs. Francis Mefford c/o Seniors Drop-ln. Ct 432 Clarence 1020 Nevin Avenue Richmond, CA 94801 Richmond, CA Telephone: 232-1317 Telephone: Mrs. Patricia K. Brown Mr. Carl B. Mutter 3255 Sweet Drive 5260 Sunset Drive Lafayette, CA 94549 E1 Sobrante, CA 94803 Telephone: 283-0819 223-2566 Mrs. Cora Burch Mrs. Della Morena 260 South 9th Street 341 - 20th Street Richmond, CA 94804 Richmond, CA 94801 Telephone: 232-8379 Telephone: - • Mr. Edmund Burk Mr. James S. Nakashita 282 Zoe Court 7 Skander Court Pinole, CA _ 94564 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Telephone: 758-2742 Telephone: 825-1537 Mr. Pete Davis c/o Housing Authority Mrs. Lela K. Sater 138 A Pueblo Avenue 1928 Woodland Drive Pittsburg, CA 94565 Antioch, CA 94509 "Telephone: Telephone: 757-8710 Mrs. Ella May Frazer Mrs. John Setley 155 Sharene #102 Garden Estates Walnut Creek CA 94596 Alamo, CA 94507 Telephone: 937-7855 Telephone: 837-5764 Mrs. Alice E. Goldsberry Mrs. Lucille Treat 106 Ontario 100 Village Dr. 0216 Oakley, CA 94561 Brentwood, CA 94513 Telephone: 625-2023 Telephone: 634-3271 Mrs. Mattie Harrison Mr. A. R. Wells 523 Suisun Avenue 63 Mayhew Way Rodeo, CA 94572 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: 799-2190 Telephone: 933-0474 Mr. Clayton A. Kempf Mrs. Zola Williams 1124 Larch Avenue 185 "A" Madeline Moraga, CA 94556 Pittsburg, CA 94565 Telephone: 376-6022 Telephone: 432-7122 Mrs. Beatrice Martilla 1548 Golden Rain Walnut Creek, CA 94595 w3V "a CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ADVISORY COUNCIL ON AGING Cathcart, Frank J. Harr, H. H. (Bud) 829 Stonehave Drive 1978 Lucille Lane Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Pleasant Hill,:CA 94523 933-3238 689-1414 Craig, Clarence Huffman, Miss_Zelia M. 130 Leanne Lane 3259 Camino Colorados Concord Mobile County Club Lafayette, CA 94549. Concord, CA 94520 283-0646 825-0109 Crowe, Mrs. Beryl Lee, Mrs. Juanetta 1301 Ulfinian Way 11 Holcomb. Court Martinez, CA 94553 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 228-3459 935-3190 Dahlin, Mrs. Thelma Schroeder, Art 2603 Vargas Court 706 Seaview Drive Concord, CA 94520 E1 Cerrito, `CA 94530 525-0177 685-8768 Doherty, Pauline Simmons,,George 342 Gloria Drive 2132 Golden Rain Road Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Walnut Creek, CA 94595 ' 939-6173 685-4606 Foreman, Roy A. Spaulding,_Roger 1231 Stafford Avenue 4662 Springwood Way, " Concord, CA 94521 Concord, CA 94521 682-8027 228-5330 Fowler, Mrs. Lofton 167 S. 8th Street Richmond, CA 94801 232-7479 0031 I . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Septeber 2 , i9 75 In the Matter of Application for Funding Job Opportunities Program. The County having been advised by the U. S. Departments of Commerce, Labor, and Housing and_Urban Development that funding is potentially available under Title % of the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, to provide a Job Opportunities Program; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator is AUTHORIZED to submit applications to the U. S. Department of Labor and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for funding under this programa PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. IN 1 hereby certify that the foregoing b a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Director of Personnel Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Auditor-Controller County Administrator (3)"~ affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Craig` 314 H 24 SPS IOM OFFICL C7 =UNT: AQ#o INISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 2ND PLOOR.ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 9 3 ARTHUR G. WILL September 5, 1975 BOARD OF SUPERN150RS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR W.N. D=GEss.C11AgAIIA16 PHONE 228.1000j 72_40`v DISTRICT.s - J.P.KENNY.V1Ci CMAt11MAN . OtSTR1CT.1 . A.M.DIAS.ctsinscr 2- J.r—WORIARTY.131nneiM 3• G A.LINSCHEID.O/sTR1cT s Mr. Roberts T. Jones, Director Office of Community Manpower Programs y 601 "D" Street, NW. Washington, D. C. 20213 Dear Mr. Jones: Reference is made to the August 22, 1975 letter from Pierce A. Quinlan to chief elected officials regarding Title X of the Public Works and Econ9mic Development Act (PWEDA) of 1965, as amended. Enclosed you will find a completed SEC-887 form containing Contra Costa County's recommended projects. These projects are in the following -two areas: 1. Welfare a. Hiring eligibility aides to visit the home of potential welfare recipi- ents to affirm or disaffirm the client's statements on the WR-2 regarding eligibility for welfare, thereby reducing the error rate. --- b. Hiring eligibility aides to recover outstanding SSI Emergency Loan payments. 2. Public Works a. Hand sweeping bike paths, curbs, gutters, and intersections. b. Weed abatement in the County right-of-way. c. Litter control along County highways. d. Repainting the red, green, and yellow curbs on County roadways. e. Performing a variety of manual work in the maintenance and repair of flood control structures and drainage channels. We sincerely hope that these projects will be approved and would appreciate being notified of the funding decision as soon as possible. Very_truly yours, Ga E: Brawn Supervising Management Analyst MHG:rf 1 Enclosure cc: Wallace Brown, Federal Representative uv315 r ' new 3tt:JU w.i asaaTee.T Oe tx..sece Paw&cr WMAr/rcATgm mnlsasa •a+•�,.. o.e•ca nae e.o,atecs... ttOsnt*Cs alt an.rj SUwiARY OF EVALUATION AND FINDINGS s'mtj"o' ! TITLE X I I I I I I I I I I II to i INSTRUCTIONS This fors is to be crospleted is duplicate b7 depac=wats.asescies or resioasl Commissim for any rajas,project or activity for such Title X fuads an sough:. The project as described bercia will be sessated ajawc so cosptnoce With 11 abepov as a of Tale X of the Public Tads and Economic Develepmeae Act sad the Title X«q*itements established by i the Sec:eaq of Commerce. The project witj oho be ssaswof asaint all projects proposed by ether assecies. Siwe the does rs,triad b be rWart sd am We Am=will bo adosetsd b/aa7itste 6e yrocnawr j of d}is appfrcatiort,We irr�ortatt tsar de tp�rnMeiate eeportiaj iosyacriona M fafl000d oepficitlY. beta numbers a.-e not secessatily consecutive but are idestiGcations nettled isr Department of Camsetc*ptocessios. Specific Lvttecrimts ate listed below for each specific question. Fill ie ALL fiywes as right jest:iioi.I.o,,—how the frgare 1rt+s right t.I.h. For eamapte.to o-werisg a dollar owwet ar 514621,the ligaro wo.0 M eatersi is de blacks nRows all cools to the wwrest ballet. Omit all(S)dally and comma signat . V salaries porceog, figures.nolo tint obs' 'mel poise is pspristed as the lista,where apl:ailw L Naso of Department.Aseocy at ltesiaaal Cassiaaioa asking this proposal(TYPE or P UND s 2-14 Fill is Agency Code as listed below: Ageac r Cd► Agowey C.8 14th tS,h 14th INA Regional Action Plaoains CommisAsom / / latseiar,Depot"""of An-Cas. Gratia Resiml Cmsissioa / 1 1Narme of Indies Aft&" 3 4 Upper Greet Lakes Res:esal Commission / 2 Geological Survey _ 3 3 New Ergs Rejiesal Cnmmiss:os / 3 buteso of Uiars 3 6 Coastal Mains Resiaaal Commission / 4 Deresn of Land lhrsgastnt 3 7 Feu:Caatts Res:assl Cou sissism / 3 National Pah Service 3 • OU-Test Re=iosal Comeissaa / 7 Daeneeilk Pow"Service 3 9 Appalachian Resiooal Cesuissits ! 6 Pacific Narshwest Resrsmal Cosmissiam 1 9 Labor,Doparrant of 6 ! Ifaepo.ee Aisiohtation 6 1 Agriwlrw,Dgarrmeal of 1 / Public Saws"Ca.-err Gnas, 6 2 Askin rte.Sabiliasti w sad Otftcs of the Secuotp 6 3 Cmervadoe Service 1 1 Farmers Hoes Adaaisastioo 1 2 Ifatiooal Sciamce Foundation T 1 Soil Conservariaa Service 1 3 National Eadoweont of the Ara 7 2 U.SForest Service 1 4 Nation!Eadowntat of the Naneicies 7 3 Ametiw Resnttsion Riwtes" Esvitarroeaal PtotecTima hescY 2 1 AdUiMiJWWi1W 7 4 Fedeal EUMV aa=i= 2 2 Tiaomeoso*Vasey Authority 7 3 • Federal Teade Commission 2 3 General Services Adsiaisttntien 2 4 Tanspot ation.DogoAosat of • / National Aersnedes sad Dasom of Public Randa S 1 . Spec*Admintsstoaa 2 3 Federal Aviatina Administration i' 2 . Interstate Caustic*Commission 2 6 Was!lass Tassit Aduirsmarina I 3 Ener Research and DewNrpmes Adaisiwwatim 2 7 CamsuBy Services Administarion 9 2 Small flasiaess Adainisention 2 a Maritime Adauisttatios Veterans Adeiaistatina 2 ! Fadoal Field Comm.Is,*tansies is Alaska ! ! 111401116 Edutotian and pellote, D"Mftm"of 3 / Cetgs of Easiness ! 2 Nat:aoal bsticuor of Health 3 I Office of E64attem ) 2 U S.Army ! 4 - meabh Services Adnisistation 3 3 U.S.Au Force � 9 Hatsies ami Urhes D.. 6p=ow% U.S.t4vY 9 3 Department of 4 / Office of the Stc as 4 1 Smiulk2enis°Issritstios 7 6 Interior.Depeopmest*111-0 3 / Actiss 7 7 owe"of Outdoor Rectvatioa 3 1 Cemmetto eod EDA 9 3 Fish and Lrldlde Sr.—'w* 3 2 B'fae OF prt[laatisa S 3 1 usto—oc rssrtevo 003 2.16 Fin in grope iej aseecy prsje=member ar ether symbol 2-33 Slice how chess foods will be used Ester"G"for Sant "c"for coettscc r I i i�li EM IPlzhMCkISI —0,1(at e,....t,J. 4 z 244 U fumes will be ss:!as Graan: 2.75 coepecicireaass(For ceaascts or Green as shown in box 3d): - Ester-'F••it the work is pedeaft directly Ester"C"if the contract or grant (force accouac) Was subject v competitive bid. Eater••C'•if Werk is carsactrd net gor prisaee caseeataaes Ester-M-if art subject co 2 F Eater`a''it beth(comb;ouios of abs..) coopecitive Did. er w 1 D 2 rr Eater"C"for othpeter) - S- 3.4 Vase sad addreaa at game for casascar.rt kmswa3 Pwar 10401 aawe sad*""as Name County of Contra Costa t 4.14 Sweat A. moz K 9 4 Administration Building U .a .. » — S.0 City.cousty of Parisbea. Stam..Zipcede: ' 0 s Martinez Contra Costa California 94553 6.14 Peaiect l.cetiora Print city aria.sp*W as listed is dee FIDS code waaal.-forklwide Gcographical•Locsrias Codas••• _ U projnc is oat withim city bow wbcim lave lata a.hlaak.U awltitity projeec.Prior ase.d_sea cities in from a_ code sU.sa es as Used is the wasmal;maldaoty codes are shows at aishr of bases.-FSS 76IM6r9078. r e.Poet ckr Name(or mases if u or4icity stem ciy ke code(Use l4i8 tys rkaa an • y is i-sunt 3 0 6 now a»"M) L Peat corny(eacdy a is mammal) at tawsties if io stmt;<wsry areas. Zce1-ry cel . . eat a L sew tb» • a . 6 1 was ssmmy.) 4 6 Contra Costa r T is Stare wade ICre!9+Mo�.elewt C.Prins sure(exactly as is Mawau or suers it u could-$rate areas. a Is lwarad la wrap S riga-ear suss) • California Fl LEarercasg:essiaaaldisaiccareDat(e.g..Eaurtitardtaaiet.wse..s 8 a ) )- Goiesir»atOUaietswde tWe . .b Qt asset them Noe.list each coagteaiotal disaiet member) �whes � 007 008 009 - • 6 0 6aaier.) _ - MJ Shaer title of poi--.c(Fat public isfasassan usek 17M Social Service and Public Works Projects I S-14 atones of work rLe•,triad d Project: wamet/sewer,tsmipsira.asioins,ata) • ,a a Home Visits to Potential Welfare Clients, Manual Labor 9.14 P=pose*1 Work(Lescn3e end product of Project: ",facilities for todasaial Pack,espoosies of twertatiessl faciucies.tawov mar private empigmnc." ' • 9 9 Reduction of Welfare Error Rate, Environmental Improveren4 10.14 List x:**week farce skins fat this Praia=cur laborers.aepesten,clerical,saprrvisory): x a Interviewing Skill, Ability to Observe and Document, _ 11.14 Skiva continued i t Laborers I 12.11 Enreethe'aoe txdr.hick best tesatbes how cher skill tegwitd by skis pair«cos he Stu by perseas Wbo are come Germy coos�m��bow project wk flow listins) U codas t)ate sac apPtaPnste.etsor • t 2 Q _ c.f.sweet:« I P:ajece will ext rd emp.oyeeat of cxis:ins Work forte 6 Proiect work forte less&baa 201.aaskilled • 2 Project will persit recall of laid a"Werk farce 7 Project awrk force 20.40f saskilled 3 Project requites special Skills knows&o exist amwg mreeployd 8 Proiec:work force 41-CM-..unskilled _ 4 Proje:r regairea skills Wb"can be s-i-ed chrewsh 9 Project-th lace 6t-W.unskilled - vaia.which-ill be peerided it Project work lice as•1CCZ waskilled S Projttr require aerw chas 30+'skilled•availability seats � loved ax krw-e ae+til eecevians tae source at Me&bow information wkrth imiWed you m make s rvds tic-.state eep.oymest setvrce,project - manaser.eec.k ' Project Manager • Ia—sec....I.,. wKw+.►Oc.».r.a►e . 003V i 1 1 Ates am pro;vc'eL»iraeatim meleu de Cedes wbieb best fu this Project from the cedes Movidtd for eseb seetioak - - r 1114 A.Ss.del latwest Gies 1 3 9 Gia S tectiaa n t. 1 e.teesraaial 6 Raitraada 2 Emew eese2te3.eaasctracisa or develepsese 7 Oriel tesa pototiew 3 tatixal defsese a Historic preservasiea 1 Eariroasraal ispe..seeats 9 crier Special, apw*We l f a re ) 3 Leat tees eemonie deaelopmeat beaerca 0 NO Special;mm is 13.15 IL Ur%w%fRwal Cad. C'.ada S.lectioa h 1 Uebso-ever 230.000 Povatattao 1 Rural 2 Uebaa•30.001`230.000 y 3 Runt-con 3 UA.-3,000-30,000 pepaLtaw 6 Aaeat-pub4e hada 1111 G Arae of Activity Cade 11 131 9 M el C«i.SatKtiaa Saalteties.woes,supply,dwLga Traesyraat4a Rentals(atdei'iap tts spe"woes • bldgs.) at Dans.levees 20 Avparn 10 Mesas,auditorium.oosCoss, 02 Dcaisase ditches 21 Bridles soar.4"Co s - 03 Flood casual 22 fiio—ya Q Guthovses 04 Resenoics.mess. 23 Pat facilities 12 Faetmies scotge naku 24 Raibad.racieas 13 Fats 03 Sankur sewers 23 Raihond sacks acrd tailuod 14 Hospiais _ 06 Sewate collection taedbeds 13 Nom"s,s?ara.eat bsildlwo 07 Se-ate eraasmest 26 uailteeds,oabor facilities 16 bdetstaal parks - 0099 v�leewets esess.Viaducts 23 s�ays 417 Jas•pciseaa - 19 ad=(Speeic7) 39 Oder 6p it7) 19 ! resters.ds�sieF owwl' p - • 71 sus Office be • . Raaaaliwt,-!lute.Cod Disc4r-o%Ids,Odes. 32 Palk.,firs.sd Caucus facilities S .1 easearcas sarrtcvs 33 Pseorssias facilities f . 14 sdwmds.eetleppes,ad whet60 Agricalcuma • . taitttooads.Sad oatber n Ckcical 80 Air a � B s�`rs ss 'r"c� - 77 vaeabwses 61 Derma st sad mamas 93 DDolsu6�t � �r 6?KD7) • fscal e3 sed boardwalks B< Elecsiotl wimug Sud(hares 62 Fish lautheries Said saber 83 Feaciat fish facilities 06 Fire Paemeaiea • 63 Game preserves.wildlife 97 Primas,modem,dnese central aefrtes Ri .11asttatras arils - 63 Path,caaj 90 ares,oos[ac 90 ScivalipsSaid�eaa'tn- Sotieaa,seaestma mesa. 99 Other(Specdy) - pacer1 a—f 'r:a"m"' Public Assistance - - athletic[uiliciee • 66 Race«acls,arable, 67 Rivas.lakes.scream,ahsres - 63 Trees.shrubs,ve2mcies,no err 79 Other es?aul7) MU D.Attire aritbia.....f cdby CSA. 1 3 Q Y .. • code Sdaetiaa - ••' @ Acivirei:coll=4.bras.preesce01 ChwW. - ce 04 �,asseccaft.c�•as ,esabrate.�sabre,aar"T 06 Dftente � mwsee _- - 1.h - 04 1F,Wsseteemww.etearaae 09 Fit.Curt,repair.evecare.eefuhiah.sCmadel.eedeceato.seaovars - 10 Fuaish,provide.supply ' 11 Slaiania,protect.Svppaet,upbsld - 12 Alanipatan,ataaevver,Spann.sae - 13 Pcadace.construct.pnTae,build.fabricate - • 11 Promote.&draw*.isttease,etteed.espaed 13 ReGae.P+---�r•caw - • 16 Release,dere!,free,aeparue 17 Rettiavt,tecover Is Stem.cermet.hold 19 TraSafec.ewer 20 Tracrium.Coe act - + 99 0tber(SpeeifT) 00318 13-M E.P.goct loes6e+/e.aesl:a c.1.e [ ; } fat.S.l.ew.. t Fedstal[ovalis;• 6 Govemsest bo;ldiass-am Faders[ 2 Federal hada 7 Gev.,msec Lads a"bod&oss-am Federal 3 Fedsxa:lands aad baildisgs 8 Primer-mas•prolic s o 4 UA".est..st:aaa 9 Pt:vate-.epaficTe } i Gotemem loads-am Fa&ml r Odw tspetily) are Rec i of e-nt Home 13,2) F.Letiw 6tomslty calm: 1 3 We 3.1001" i I labor casts(sa!&ty,baaefia)as 7=at now of tool peaircc c-o- 2 Label casts fra'ary.beoefio)are fess than 73%of tool P*cc cos". } 13.22 Is tb s poiaee m activity ase of tM loue.;ois 1 1 3 3i I Fasds to ca.cimr as essstias activity or peejecc. • 2 Fmda to tesaF a mmli ocad ocdvuy of project. 3 Foods to im:siate a mo activity at ptejec:. • 4 Cents to ftrancv as explicit oeecavn as a jamiaenly spprovad activity ar project. 1 Z1 Does this project accelate m on Ss;eg at planted activity ar advance on activity aebenviar ploaaed tot Fisni Year 19773 - r= N 1 as i ESTIMATED PROJECT RHAMC AG Closaeo that tb odditieo of luno A*t msh E-[egsal lwet F.toed pmieat coetj - !i .i 111 A.-red,X taco taV.e.e.a [ 4 1 13, y, � S Q O( � • $a .s s• sr i 14.22 IL Son roods avatublr GTI• I t A 10,M I • t • 14.2! C.Private hada available res•.doaaciens.rssso.-C-) 1 1 I I I I l t _ _ MU O.Local(cods available G.r..«maty va city.ew.) T 4 ` 15151614181 } M Y � 1443 E.OTHER FED_tTAL FDMDS j - l.Teal otbet Federal Agency Fmda Cd there aml s aura ocher Federal Ageaciea.aha.tale)FdMl(oda • bran oU aseacies). ! - 1 + 1 1 1 181117161E! - Y M t 11.51 2.Enter cads of the ether a ebr Is"O"coombeg"is EI above.:[appliuhle. - (Also.pric czar d all els lsm eacies.i[appliealle. fetes co listiej sber.n is lits 2-14T T L - �• a-U. S. Department of Health Education and Welfare E E _ d 14.53 F.T•ral pai00 coat Me=A.D•C•D.EI a F): 1 4 i I � 111 11411181 - ss as saw aec•.v.••n. 4 "Caret rsse►.vo 01319' . F.glytsaee/leher ash(estiwatad)z I �.- IS.14 A.Toni estimated tabor cow.aU!soda(iwck de theca teed indictee.,*Sea sod lriaje bowefink 1 s 1300130141 .1 .f M is 15 21 • 8.Fsdu&ted rtusbat of pose"h be employed on the project. .2,91 » as - 15.26 C.Eutisated tsaweeashe of employment. Dae nsaa sensb qob 176 casdweo. (Deteraised by. moa of total estiosted wouber of boas of penoes to be t eapis2ed divided by 176 s sw4 outs) 1 i 1 t 1 31 31 61 Istel D.Tool cost pet now-watb is dollars(divide km 13.14 A by kens 13-25 1 s 111101014 >a as Isar E.-Labor isawsitp(divide ks 13-14A(total mimeted labor costs)br kens 14-33 F (fetal pmjeet cost). petdetaje nauk now be expressed is.mels percentage _ • para ootr,sot b emoted 100: _ 1 i 8,J2 x - >. at - • F.Coaster somber of pwtaaoa uaempiared is elistble area CSee IiR al elisible atsexk 1 s1 12#5100,21 Ulm G Uneople7cent sate is area(expressed b the baodsedtb puts"-i.e.,sboold the nor. be 82x.the es"in tba bixk.ould be I 1 8 1-1 2 10 (x): 1 3 It 01 10101 2 so sa ISM I _ • IL Daft of smenspkgmeot eves A4ock Dar.Tam); 1 i 0 t 812 t 0l 7r 5 I 1. hoarse of—play—race(w State Fapiels eat Secvow.Lamre Der-am statistics.etc k - State Emploti-ment Service 16-16 TM oqi iuwnsbr be made to employ the asumpispod? (Fater is--Y-for Yes or"M-•let Mo) (See Title x tgaireaan.kens 1) Q above Cgai cum 0641)is as Aseaq ptoeednsf,estae A-• � • if&beat to%suesest 0640 is is Geaat teras efts.-� _ u above npuesm 0640 is in Castrate tans.eater--C-- - 1 6 if&mote rgui.c om(1640 is is ad=— _.tsar..a..) „ - 16.16 Date rode X foods eaa be ebliSsead akar sstdwttiw of ass""Cie later Chas December 31,1973 saVer dee=Sod is,rule X requiteams,ken 21 y ( o. I vw I - 1 f t f • M 1t - 1652 Dare..ck(esplersese)ass k ncbvdal d b mesio(neo rode X esquiruean.krns 3k - r w• vw 1 6 1� 1 115 715j - • 16.73 - - Xnim wd date project will be 735 complete(See rule X rq&iteaesss.kens dk 1 6 0.81 .417 6 Fstiaated dace project Liu be eomptead- 1 6 '�rlGir0 t - 7- .r 16-60 R•lorM"asup as few plias(S»Title X Reg6kowasts how sa A.Lt sst-"ee.;a selmind for this pwjecO(Emm•'Y'•for Yes w•'fit"fee Ke) II.a.amavw 17.140 delve. It&maw is Tot.mosWer 16.418. WHY y N 16.41 a ft.vas d-a3"rot ea•dvctad? Mom"Y"for Ya,"1t'•for 4o er"P"for pemdias,it it Las - beee scheduled). 16 p a. 17.14 C.Ezpla:m Loa.deft 6atiaa Was u.s&abet activity is eat ieeaasistaat Wird ioesl%a��plass. Ezp"dom shmm Cat oitbis da am*liars pre ;"bale". (Ta bee"mplet•d«tf711 Ih• osarsr to 16.43 is-No!*.) • as as r• 1940as 1 8 1 r• - 19.14 1 9 20.14 COMMENTS 8Y LOCAL GOVERNMENT(Sea Title I It•.6) Is applico•t sm ItaW 3.14 a emir of s"uwl 4ovaoraet? (Face:-r*lar Yes or"I4•'Got NQ Ile 20.15 If Item 2411 is"W.tbdappmrm aoic for d w area have as oppoemay to coasrmt a pnV*mis of Iter w"Y'•for Yes.or"A for No.) - • 2 O as 20.16(Mate eoanew Were requested true oak of semetal saseraseet tar area. mllilhal Eater is 1--e blacks belw.da apprapriam staaeoty/lejal aatbatiry(ies)tot this pr"*SaL _• 21.14 A. 2 1 2191CIFIRI ' I - • • as 213] a2 1 219'u's I C,0 I9 ( � as sr ' =m C. 2 1 8181SITIAIT 11 181 41 g - - Naso."dot"&W adq►s•r smobw d o6reid otspswrlls isr thio pwjsot IMmlm Www.mi hem mmuniryi Nvactt Ata,..• ' i4swere.some se:aid•sl stfitid.id aad"rirp me owalis pwjm•s4"Muscat pw0 h•/•. . . � Stssatsre - Title • 0321 OFFICE OF COUNT ADMINISTRATOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - - 2NO FLOOR, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING •IARTINE2- CALIFORNIA 94553 ARTHUR G. WILL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS GOONEY ADMINISTRATOR � PHONE 229.3000 P Se tember 8 1975 W. N. BOGGESS. CHAIRMAN DISTRICT 4 J.P. KENNY-vICE•CNAUIMAN DISTRICT t " A. M. DIAS.DISTRICT z ' J. E.MORIARTY.DISTRICT 3' .E.A. LINSCHEID- DISTRICT 5 Mr. James If. Price, Area Director Department of Housing and Urban Development San Francisco Area Office One Embarcadero Center, Suite 1600 San Francisco, California 94111 Subject: Proposal for Deployment of EDA Title X Job Opportunity Program Funds _ Dear Mr. Price: Pursuant to the memorandum dated August 26, 1975 by Mr. Roosevelt Jones concerning Title X Job funds, we are enclosing two copies of Form SEC 887 (Summary of Evaluation and Findings -- Title X.)• outlining a proposed activity to be funded. The Title X funds will be utilized to augment and accelerate progress on the Montalvin Manor Area Park project activity (Activity Number 19 in our 1975-76 Community Development Program). The project is located in the western area of Contra Costa County (Census Tract 3640) where the current unemployment rate is 10.0% (July 1975 figure supplied by The Data and Research Division of the California Employment Development Department). The project consists essentially of improvement and development activities, which are highly labor intensive and will employ many persons currently unemployed in the project area. It would require an allocation of $104,090 and approximately six months for comple- tion. It is our understanding from a phone conversation with Mike Daugherty of your office, that the information in the following sections of Form SEC 887 will be supplied by HUD: 2-16, 21-14A, 21-33B, 21-32C, and Area Office Director name and address. For further information, please contact the Contra Costa County Plan- ning Department at 372-2035. Sincerely yours, Arthur G. Will County Administrator AGW:dh Encs. 00322 ., •,l. VC _ , , hn . ... .• !'.. 7.: - . ; . I I I . I � � .1 �: � � �. . -, .. * "' -"",---",�.,,��,,�..�-,,-.',�,�--.',--"", .. � r: i . I � � . I I 1 I I I I I � . I , . ., :_., . -,,11:,,_.- ,- "-, , , , " ' ,`� __ - -, �, _ � 1. � I I I . .. I .., � � ,� . , . , - , - - - I'll---, �' I I . I I . - � . .. . � - . 1' , --1 _ - ,�, , 11 -1 1-1 _:,-- - .- -1 - ;-1- —�_!_11`_ I I � , .I I . I -——-, -111. 1— -, .17 1 1 �I o I I ., — .I . — . . I . I.: �, I — , - �11 I - __1-1�1---_ � � 4-111, n, � 11 � I I � I � . �: ��, . , "; __', - __ -.- - , ;� .'- � � I � I " � . .. , , , � -- __ ., - - �, 7- s: .�_._ .-._--.,. . sonu SEC-844 .s 01:PAINTUM1.1 oc_r C+NNt rrcr Rilp'li T M►NTI.FICATIo"I(UMPEa : t ' arr,r..2.Tnl : r.►►,rr.,t.r •.n:'+t c,.rr..r. i.(COrMCattE-.USE'OIIIYI - _ Septal Ne .. 1 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION AND.FINDINGS TITLE X lel._,_Wil: +i; ', 7 '_ ,r 1 INSTRUCTIONS ,f F 11 � 71gx (arm rti ti+;he completed in rlupliraty by de�artmcn•s q i Dere••. ar ri t tr,,,rl comm►..um liar nny 1 engram (t" n r r nr T. . yctivity(ar Which Title X lundv:ire snirglit."'Lhr-i's t t.d:•%,er 14A 1,t In a ill l C;mcti crrr d ay cruet'-.rr c,mh',nn.c.-,,.� the I,r—;siin% of 1 it(t K of tht:;Puhlic:warkx and I �u:1,•o.4 Itrvt 1.h.l•r,u•�it A•t .irn1 the i`rtk\ rcqunrrrMnt r Fil Ir hcd �r eM•.secrCtTry o(.(,ammeice. 11�1 ` Phe ptr+jett «ill'alcu br measured n/ainat all prosect: j+rr•pn.e�l hj nthrzr oFencies ar } ;Since flic d.Iri rrquireJ:ru b.nportr J tm'this loan wi1V ht:tnrfnm,f'•rl rn l".pirate fhc proca s ln�n!fhrs,ryr/rhi ttr.N► rt'r 1, impnrl of fhnf d,t :,pprupriafr•nyrurfin�irsfauifiAnx hcar,lluvr+l.r•Kp(irill� '- j4 :. _ .__.I : + �I r�4. Ite1.m numlxrx rare not,necessarily eausccu{ive brit are id,nrtlicAtiuns need►J for Depattmt nt of F.o i ile a pro►r•: rnF Speeific'tnstiucrioys are listeJ.beloy lut.eerh.kpeufir;quextiun: f Fill in ALL figtittrs o:. rig6f'jdsiifird•a.e., enter the.figure,(reel right to leh ;For etrarilple, rn Mftr►raye deller;arwerM;ef =!?S,G28; tbo figure vrould he ontered ie;tbe Necks os;sl_'L.LlJ 2- 11 .�SlJFJ?J�J•'.Round o1I eentsas the.nearese Boller 0r•rt r .- all S)del lei and cotelae sioni. In Onloring perccrlla� liyureo,,Rete'/hoc the decltael pint is j opinlett err the Pone,s*He ' t"{a oppliea`In. ' .. ' Y y 1 n_ . -: . _ _ -. Y .. _ � 3" 1.'Narae:of.Drly.ment, Agency or Regional Commission,making this proposal(TYPE upR1NT)r �;� �. Dept. of-Housing and Urban Deveiopfnent , ,__ . y . . . :,. : . 2-1! fill it rl6rncy Code as li eed below:,, I. . 11 ., [ I : , , . I , , �- .. .1 :�:.: -r��2 �` ' L %. �,' h.1 r y ,g -. Agency Cnde ` r. Aryr•ney Cede+ T' 1416 1916' . . r I "# ;t ;ih: r ; . _ -- 11 - .r ,. 1 11 RtRional:Actian 1'Iaiming C ommiaxicns A Q, Inlrrier,'Daporlrnent of.the Cen #" Uznrke.Rrpinnal C•omrnission`, tl 1 Rurrau.( bldi►n Affair•: S t z ? I,I,pt•:_Gna:,I.a.:rs.ltarinn.:l tunw:icSinn ll 2 Grnli�t•rc rl-Surrrt a • , y Plcw IinrLtuUiits/;irn,..l ( .ni.nii.cinn l! 1. i Iture.�n of tilinrs . Co.-.Ia1 1)Lifin Ilegimoil C•amm+ :.inn A ! Ittur:iu n' 1.ind \hnr �nrrnc °'4 huw Corners'Lr•/;inn,il,(,nrrmiYaiun 0 S \.rtitirrt%l 1'.tik.�rr.ic,c 1 , r n Ohl;i'rat ItcK".,.l conmtnsiun 'q 1 '/ Ilounecrllt ('user crrr t* S o hs ` r�, „, Appal thlawn ginnal:.0 onrrms•un t! 6 , k 1'acdit Nonhreat.Rcgronll C:umrnl.rinn . (! J Lober, DepnrlreeM of t 0- 4 ��k= V 1.,olaw,r A,imuiistr uirnr 1, 1 �` A?ncellttre, Dcporinrrnt of 1 A f uhlri , ,rye'( i•ccr(,rants (. =;, i• A/tntuhtur.�r.rhilixntivn and' (litre►'►► the Ser ret In _. , (omerrn•itvi brrtcr 1 I1. I Yi + {torr ) �.►►rare 1 aura.. t. ' IarmeryHome'Admmir'tc:uiun : „ 1 2 litwn 1 .stril.Gon:crcatiun�crvicc . I ; \ulnual l n,lowmrncaf.Jrr Atex; . I , : _ 11� U 54 S .:F.orext Service d, .,rttnu:rI I n(.wi,+�nt ,it rhe Uomi�nrurx ' • 1 I's Amenc�n Ilrwduunn Illee•ntrnnlal M ' Eevirtrrttnc1.ntal 1 rotcttion Agency 2 1 Admuticaatlun;, z : Frdaral LsnerFy Adminixtration 2 2, Icnuccscr\r.tllcy Autl•nnts -:. p Tedetal.'I rndr Camuiission' 2 '3 w . 'General Serr{crs:`Adnrin sttation 2 , � Trensoertatre :' DepeMwMt el g p National Aeionaurics and Ilurrlu o1.f Pubhc Rads R 1 Space Ailalinistrution ; 2 } I'ede•ral Arwtimt AJrninrtitratton - R r} ` Imerasa�e Comnrrrcr.Cotemission 2 6: 111t a:i►fast.T anau Adwtnexuitton R S Energy Research and Derclupmcnt "u ur Aderinistrwtu,n 2 7 Y•om+nurrity S ►tiers Ad{o{nlscratinn 1 ,t SmallltusiDexl: Adurinis{ration. 2 ff Alaritimd;Adn.inistranans 9 l•, ', _ Vcteraua':Admini.rratir+n' 2 9 . 11 a:r.ien,l 1 i•1,1 Corm fnr,49,o•nit. s in Alirxka .� , n Health• Edveelit.n`onJ Nblfur0. DeperlartrwI of } 0 Copt o/l-- Terra ) : x -'National Iu Brute ..i Ilealth ; 1 .1 L Q(lice of LAuiatr in, 3 1. 7 U.S.Arany .• . '1. t.. r .-< '.Ilcnlrh$cn ice:: AdminiapntioR ) ' 3;, ' Y ll.F.Air l ut:c " , ti 9 :, flausinq end Vfhon Dovelopmenl, U.S. Nlovy1. % y I. Drpo�tnrrnf of .1 1f o�rice of 11..•Secrt.taly ,1 I Smithsinri.ur Inatitutiau 7 G.. :'•Bran T - Interior, Dept+rttnent of the } if � 11 Hnrc.•ur+l lht!.I,mrJtrc,^atian } ) C.ommorcs end'EDA 9 s i�haua W�Idlitr`,rriic } 2 t `-, liurr.nr of'It.c I.:r.i.un•u S '.: '. , - _!. 1 - q r 2 �: W. O"32" F t Gy .sem- :. _.r _ i ��._0,0,0,.0, .. . .•.�:.,.,,�. 2.16 Fill is paaP"aeug.Prosy rrojecr number or ether symbol 7.33 51am boa tb0,.e INnd•will be need: Fater-G-lea Runt . "C'for comeacr �t�..I1:l.C.11._L.E_LI_Ll_l Ll�Jlot IaaN o 2 Cj . 0,0,()0,0,fM cher Ixe0,eey)-•-- ao sa _ t. 2.34 It(uvula will be u%cd as Boaster: N/A 2.3S(saspetitivearss(For Goruraets of Gsanti us theme its- loos 1•l). Ealre•'P••it the woad( is performed directly Entre"C"if the contractor rant - (l * acaccount) Was sot•ject to comperitive bid. 1'atrer C ' it work is contracted out Be rater"N"i/as sable"to 1•riv aee contractors 1 0 2 Farce"t•"if barb(combination of above) competitive bid. 0 2 w 4s Eater"d"for other esractrre 1,s 3.14 lame and address of grantee (or contra:tar.it L•avowa) Pit seR.t node and address No" K3 L Contra Costa County �_J• is as 14 an 4.14 Street Address 0 4 6S1 Pine Street as as as N 5.14 City.County or Parishes. State.zipeode: - FiT31 Martinez Contra Costa Coun&X, California 94SS3 6.14 Project location: Print city mase.spelled as listed is dwFIFS code maaral.••serWwWe Geopiphicsl•l.ocarion Codes"• If pojece is am Within city Iwnn., .-a.leave Item a.blank.U multi-city Project.print rime all cities in Item A. Cade all entries as listed is the wnual;swlti.entity Codes ace slams at rtsdw of basea<.•FSS 7610-M.90Jt1. a.Print city acme(w aasaes if in multi•eieY area). Cbt'to4r fgso. "ahrn oa0', 13 N/JLis iw were r o oar . • 6 Z MG 6 s�_I..J car. r e 99W.) N/A . - i Ctmory code(1140,"it.hen poi- k Print etwaey(exactly an is mammal) or eouaries if is siulei-snooty areas. .et t•on ms.e view ' now eaeetv.) 4 colrrR�► CMA of U _ _�,J ss Stott code I**—+Mn i0,ct C.Prior state(exactly as in manual) or states it in emit(_-swe arras. a. is Iee..s.1;.o.ee@ f than«a1,or4te) : 46 6 C.Lal M _ _ 1 ao t1, d.Enter rearprssiomell district wetaberfe.g..Enter liestdistrict.etc..as. Q 01111 -3. Cog10.siss4l.aur:cs code Ib.. (11 more Than ane. list each congressional disarin Number) Is ore.bra Maas 21 is in rm.M thaw w DISTRICT 7 4 6 drnaiet.a 1,c N 7.14 Share title of revolver(Far pablie information use) d Montalvin Manor Area Park J 8.14 Nature of Wort:(i.e..land of project: Waterfsewee.eamp4ites.training.etc.) OMS Park Develot)ment a1, as a. .. 9.14 Purpose of work(Describe end pothers ci rmleet: i.e..facilities for hNluatrial Park.expansion of reereatlaaal facilities.trai6ias IN private colder"".etc.) Expansion of Recreational Facilities on a• to Aide 10.14 List major work force skills for this politer"..labotea.tmrpewers.eleeiesl,supelvisoryk Laborers \r :. as ., 11.14 Skills r'osriauatif [tip N/A "J sit 6. \. 12.14 Bawer the our color whia.h host desetibea hour the skill.t etc l 11 rhea project rau he mer ter persons who.are - _ presently uncoph yed in she project area(select code boo below lestem V codec.14 use Doe appropriate.closer code from 6-*stoup which beat describes poieet walk lace. Code Selection • 1 11talrat .ill cased emploolrovnt of ca.•riNg stalk loose 6 Proiefr 1,0816 force Ira..Imn lel':1815,111ed 7 Pro-Svcs No ill'retmts recall.•1 1464.41 1,w16 Lorre 7 lhajecr s"rk farce 10-4n oro tlll0,.1 i 3'ralcel teyuur%sl-rLe al.tilt.Lm•..a te eai.s amaap anea■plaved S Pta.irce want forst 41 -60:amiroWl 4 Project te.laltr%nLall%a4ish%;.an l r Frtacd theoogb on-the-job 9 181141inI Work lone 61 -N0•:umLJlr•l trainily,aloin(gall 1■ I-1••cl.tr l d Pa6ject wwle force W -10111.an6.1,illed Pnq.•l t t6•yuaa. N•wv dun'-U-. •.144.1.aeailahJiry aAaag aNN'l..1.• 6.1 161-1 I.61.an"Neill era t".t..a at :e.arr few a.wrsr a ts . �.e aula+l:.r"w.+I.lab ens J youto w..Le t 1a I gement(8.a..stare emp neat%."T cc.pwjece amawl.rick: California Employment Development Department \\•....6 a ...N•.N I ascOu..Vc ra.r-tor. 00324 r. Area sad p.geer elassificaticns 041cct the co.lcs Which Leat fit this[voice[lrr+a the conies provided for each secriozl' 13.14 A. Special 10101661 Coda: 1 1 319 1 Code Selection to Is rot tf 1 Bicentennial 6 Rwilcoads 2 Energy reaearch,coasetvatios or development 7 Other trsnsp0ta[ion S 3 Nationrl defense . . 8 Historic lerserva[ion ' 4 Eavironmental impra>emencs 9 Otho special interest(Specify Recreatioli ) i S Long term economic developawnt benefits 0 No special interest S ,•i 13.1S S.Urbon ural Gee l •. j ,, SI Code Selection t' 1 1 Urban-over 230.000 population 4 Rural community 2 Urban-30,001 •230.000 Pc'pulotion S Rural-outside community 00 .'.' 3 Urban-3.000-30. 0 popubtion 6 Rural -public leads ' •i 13.16 C.Area e(Activity Code 6 IS I '} Code Selection Sanitation,water supply,drainage Transportation sollditps (excluding t►onapettatien • bfdgs.) i Ol Dame. levees 20 Airpocts 40 Ateaas,auditor ems,museums, i 02 Drainage ditches 21 Bridges stadiums,theaters- ct 03 Flood control 22-Highways 41 Courthouses ; 04 Reservoirs.wells. 23 Pon facilities 42 Factories t storage tanks 24 Railroad stations 43 Forts OS Sanitary sewers 23 Railroad truths and railroad 44 Hospuils 06 Sewage collection roadbeds 43 Houses,apartment buildings " 07 Sewage treatment 26 Railroads,other facilities 46 Industrial parks- 08 Scotrm severs 27 Roads■0d atreets 47 jails,prisons 09 Waterlines.viaducts 28 Waterways 48 Lighthouses - 19 other(specify) 39 other(Specify) 49 Mattipwpose centers.come:unitr buildings 30 Nursing homes 31 Office buildings Recreation,wildlife,and Disciplines.predacts,trades, 32 Police.fire,and rescue facRities • natural resources services 33 Processing facilities 60 Agricultural centers. 80 Aim conditioning.te34 Schools.colleges.and otherfrigeratioa learning and trainiag facilities fairgrounds.and market 81 Clerical services SS Warehouses areas 82 Data Processing 39 Other(Specify) 61 Bating and swimming 83 Drafting.mopping facilities and boardwalks R4 Electrical wiring and fixtures 62 Fish hatcheries and other 83 Fencing tiab facilities 66 Fire protection 63 Game preserves.wildlife 87 insect.rodent.disease control refuges 88 Navigation aids 64 Landscaping 89 security services 63 Parks.eampaires.comfort 90 :shooting sod training stations,recreation areas. 99 Other(Specify) Picnic areas,rest areas. athletic facilities 66 Race cracks.stables 67 Rivers.lakes.streams,shoes 68 Trees.shrubs.vegetation.flowers 79 Other(Specify) 13.18 D.Actlsa within area of activity code: ! 3 Code Selection . Ol Avenge.grade 02 Acquite,collect.obtain,procure 03 Change.exchange.replace 04 Compare.associate,correlate.evaluate.meuore.relace,survey 03 Control,regulate 06 Create.develop 07 Dismvtle.demolish , OR FlimilcAtc,cetwive.excavate 09 Fix.cure.repair.restore,refurbish.remodel.redecorate,renovate 10 Futnish.provide,supply 11 Idairusin.prole",support.uphuM 12 IJanipulate.maneuver,operate.use 13 Produce.cona[ruct.prepare.build.fabricate 14 Promote.advance,increase,extend.expend 13 Refine.putily.clean 16 Releawe.detach,tree,separate 17 Retrieve.recover . IS Store.confine.ho1J 19 Transfer.eanvey 20 Trasmincm,coven , 99 Other(Spccify) 01 and 06 above - •OIw sec.I&r$*.Too 3 uscom. oc 110411`41./•• . • 0032 ' •_'t' �i:IXt� 13-20 E.Project location/ownership codas 1 T 315 r •Salaetiflrl I Federal buildings 6 Governmenc bufldiags -not Federal 2 Federal bads 7 Governawnt lands and buildings-aos Federal 3 Federal lands and baildings 5 Private -non-profit 4 Indies traervations 9 Private-profit making S Govet rumen lands-not Federal 0 Other(Slrcify) 4c `f 17.21 P.Labor Intensity code: a Cods Soloctie e = •' 1 Labor costs(salary.benefits)act 75%at more of total project costs. � � •; 2 Labot costs(salary.benefits)are less than 75%of total project costs. 13-22 to this project or activity one of the foUawiag7 I : ft I Fulda to continue an existia)t activity or project. 2 Funds to restart a terminated activity or project. . 3 Funds to initiate a new activity or project. 4 Costs to finance as explicit overrun on a previously approved activity at project. •4� 13-23 Does this protect accelerate an on going or planned activity.or advance oro activity otherwise '•I' planned for Fiscal Year 19771 (Eater"Y"for Yes.••N"for No) _Y.J ESTIMATED PROJECT FINANCING(Issues that the oUltlea of Items A through E-1 equal Item F, 16191 project cost). 14.14 A. Title X funds requested 1 4 1 1110 141019� 0� . • 14.22 B.State funds available - M4 ! !! ( ' _1 4 1 14 1 9 191 6 t 01 s. 14.29 C. Private funds available(i.e..donations.trusts.etc.) I .1 , ' 0 _• ss • 14,36 D. Local foods available(i.e..county of city.etc.) i __12 1 •• u 14,-13 E.OTHER FEDERAL FUNDS 1.Total other Federal Agra y Funds(if there ate-2 or mare other Federal Agencies, show legal Federal funis from all agencies). 1 a I 1 1215 01010 •s w 14.31 2.Enter code of the other apeacyy oviding the largest conttibucion in El above,if applicable. 4`4 (Also.prise name of all the furtag aSeaeits.it applicable. Refer to listing shorn in frena 2-141. l 1 J4 0 E a, D.S. Department b. Development and Planning' C. .l t d. 14.53 F. Total project cast (Items A • It t C • U • F1 a t): . MI ., [ �2 10101 010 101 rOn"att-Nr N.tM 4 u,co"Raoc r••r••►ts to �' ••�. �„ ... ..... .. .......... ;f Employment/labor costs(estimated): 15.14 A.Total estimated labor costs.all funds(include direct and indirea wages and fringe benefits): • t s �ltslo 01010 � ;• 15.21 i S. Estimated number of persons to be employed on this pcvjeet. C- Estimated man-mootbs of employment. One man-mooth equals 176 own-hours. (Determined by: now of total estimated number of hours of persons to be ' employed divided by 176 map-hours) _ t t 3 2! 0 15.33 ' D.Total cost per man-month in dollars(divide Item 15-14 A by Item 13-26 C e 15.39 E.-Labor intensity(divide Item 13-14A(Total estimated labor comes)by trap 14-33 F (Total project come). Percentage result must be expressed in whole percentage Points only.am to exceed 100: _ • t s 17iSIX .. as- IS-42 F.Current number of persons unemployed in eligible ares(Sce Use of eligible areas): Contra Costa County 1 s 1 l 1 lS 1 O t 3 1 3 Minus Richmond, Concord and Pittsburg „ IS-So G.Unemployment rate in ores(expressed to the btudecdtb•percenr•i.e..should the rate be 0.2x,the entry in the block would be( 19 1•12 10 13): • mis '1 15.55 we H.Date of unemployment rate(Month.Dap.Year): l S 01 7�0o.t 1� 7v! se •o July 1 1975 I. Sweet of unemployment rate(i.e..state Employment Service.Labor Department statistics,ece.): California Employment Development Department t6.1< rill requirement be made to employ the socuployed? (Enter in"Y"fat Yes at"N"for No) (see Title X requirements.item 1) 1 6 16.15 If above requirement(16.14)is an Apencv procedure.enter"A" It above te"itemene(16.14)is in Grant terms eater."C'• It above requirement(16.14)is in Contract terms.eater"C•• [ 6 C U above requirement(16-14)is in other t ct 1 .Cores 16.16 Date Title X buds can be obligated after notifiestiew of transfer(No later than December 31.1973 and/or described in Title X requirements.Item 2). "o M16o. rw 1 6 112 311 7tS _j is-22 Date wail,fewployment)can be-%cl•e lukd to begin(see Title X requitemeses.Item M. ..o s► rw 1 6 0 2 0 I 7t 6] lb•21< Estimated date project will be 73»complete(See Title X requirements.item 4): ]* 61 1o. 75 •0t6 ] 16-34 Estimated date ptoject will be enmplcted: ..o o. t ra 0. 1i_7t .oa.,s.e.•Sol•s.•.. 3 et•eow•ne uori.nr• 0032 w.. r .t. r C. 16-40 Relationship Is local plan. (See 71119 X requtrenseel.flea S) '• A. la an A-95 review required fur thin ptnieet? (Enter"Y•• Inc Yea or "N"fa No) �. It No,answer 17-14C below. If answer is Yes.answer J641 D. s 16.41 S. Was A-91 review conducted? (Enter"Y'•for Yes,"N•'for No of"1'"(at penJing. if it has f been scheduled). ! 3' 17-14 r C. Explain how detefaunation was made that activity is not inconriarrnt with Incally approved piano. t Faplanatinn should fit within the three lines provided below. (To he cowplolod only if the oeswer to 16-40 is "No".) r M17 N/A • p. to pa r 18.40 1 8 N/A ' to - 19.14 1 9 N/A •20.14 COMMENTS BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT(See Title X Requirements liens 6) Is applicant la(farm 3-14 o wait of general goverruaont? (Falter"Y"(or Yes at"N"for No). z o y to 20.15 If Item 20 if is"No".did an" giciate unit ofeat-W rvemcnt for the ea have an Opportunity to ccmatcitt oa sp-cant Proposal? ( mur Ewer ' Y"for Yes.a"N"for NO.) 2 0 NI A to 2046'Dn4 ComtaenKwere'tequestal Gtr►t unit of Rcnetal rnt;wtuernt ftK arc r• utt ..1.2 0 012 l7.l-4J N 1rPRa�eeptti, ?!"S.rlti�7lwMfM••.w wr.•'.. w:�•�.�y�..►vr4rr-i.�aw..•-Mk�r.Mi�lt7'�' r 1'►C•Or:4r 7.T•i^.•.:::► --w •.IqS•�. Enter in the blocks below,the apfroiviate for this propos,►i. ays•J.t:• 21-11 A. i ' { f" !• K ! I :usl fru . to 7) •.. .. • .I' •� N • f�"-_•gyp-r 21.32 C- 2 1 I SiTIAIT ( ( I (_, �, •t Name.address artd teierlxae suud.et d nUiei,l teepsaatble fns this prrieet Iprvirct 01 icre,etc.)iruu.fwntsnnll earner: Insert: Area Office Director Cianature Address y • t F' : Sipwatwe. a( .. .� i.l v At•t:y • •r phi• rf.wct .4•14.ue t -I er4 funds. GZL S:y„acute !� David 0. Meeker, Jr. Assistant Secretary. Ccu=nity Planning and Devr-lapuent t�i' � licit >>... •on.r•t e•e.r.•su 6 u.eJ-.•.•r.e t•t•r•e•ta • w328 1117 TIM BOARD Or S OER v iS un S OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for Landscaping on San Ramon and ) September 2. 1975 Green Valley Creeks, Danville Area, ) Flood Control Zone 3B, Project No. 8515-75. ) Bidder Total Amount Bond Amounts Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. $39,817 Labor & Mats. $19,90.9'19,90.9 1460 Concord Avenue Faith. Perf. $ 39,817 Concord, California 9$520 Neil Shooter Company, Novato ' Watkin & Bortolussi Inc., San Rafael R.E.G., Inc. , Hayward Bibens Nursery Company, Modesto Munkdale Brothers, Inc., Burlingame Cagwin & Dorward, San Rafael Huettig & Schromm, Inc., Menlo Park Contra Costa Landscaping, Inc. , Martinez The above-captioned project and the specifications' therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received, the Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that said contractor shall iresent two good and sufficient surety bonds as indicated above; and that the Public Works Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned .it together with bonds as noted above and any required certificates of insurance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. IT IS FURTIM ORDERED that, upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, the bonds posted by the other bidders are to be exonerated and any checks submitted for security shall be returned. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975 - CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this Is a full. true d correct copy of the oribinat document which is on file In my office. and that It was paused & adopted by the Board of Superriaors of Contra Costa County. California. on. the date ohown.ATTEST: J. R. 01-9801%. County Clark&esofflclo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. cc:- Public Works Director by Deputy Clerk. County Counsel as4A - i97� County Auditor Contractor ilVsl,6� Form 9.1 Rev. 6-75 In the Board of Supervisor of Contra Costa County, State of California AS EX OFFICIO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND MATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT September 2 , 19 2a In the Matter of Channel Work, San Ramon Creek, Flood Control Zone 3B, Danville Area. (Work Order 8076) The Public Works Director having recommended that he be authorized to perform maintenance and minor betterment (installing a down drain and replacing and grouting rock rip-rap) in San Ramon Creek near Freitas Road, Danville area, said work to be done by a combination of County forces and hired equipment at an estimated cost of $6,500 (funds to be provided by Flood Control Zone 3B); and It having been noted that said work is a Class 1 cate- gorical exemption from Environmental Impact Report requirements; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order enured on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Flood Control District Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12/74 - 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard 0030 In the Board of Supervisors of �r#[9)kJ49 &%%DS&9t U.12.694MY0 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER C01iMUTTON DISTRICT September 2 , 19 .71 In the Matter of Silt Removal, Wildcat Creek, Flood Control Zone No. 7, North Richmond Area, Work Order 8077. The Public Works Director having requested authorization to remove 1800 cubic yards of silt from Wildcat Creek, North Richmaand area, approximately i ,000 feet below Central Street to the Southerm Pacific Railroad Crossing, stating that said project is- a Class 1 categorical exemption from environmental impact report requirem pts, " and advising that said work will be done by a combination of county forces and hired equipment at an estimated coat of $202000; IT IS BY TEM BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is APPROVED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of ac: Public Works Director Witness affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 _ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk y &,� Deputy.. Clerk. Constance J. Davies 0033-1- H 031H 24 8/75 10M H 24 8175 20M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 1975 In the Matter of Closure of Certain Streets for "Pioneer Day," on September 6, 1975, Danville Area. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that permission is GRANTED the Contra Costa County Heart Association to close Railroad Avenue (Road No. 4725T) between Linda Mesa Avenue and Prospect Avenue and between Prospect Avenue and School Street, Danville area, on September 6, 1975 between 6 p.m. and midnight, to hold its fund—raising benefit "Pioneer Day," subject to the conditions set forth relative to celebrations in Resolution No. 4714 adopted by the Board on December 28, 1965. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing 1s a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c• C.C.C. Heart Assn. (via P. L-)p my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director ervisors Danville Fire Protection affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 75 DistrictJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk California Highway Patrol B �1..� De Clerk H 24 ,,fiq T5-p!' Sheriff y ldred 0. BallardDeputy m332 iR In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 119 7 In the Matter of Authorising Acceptance of Instrument for Recording Only. The following offer of dedication for drainage easements is accepted for recording only: Date Grantor Reference August 259 1975 Garden Creek Development Subdivision 4295 Company, Inc. PASSIM by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered onthe minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. oc: Recorder (via P.W.) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of: Public Yorks Director Supervisors Director of Planning wed this 2nd day of3eptember , 19 75 County Assessor J. R. OLSSON, Cleric By Deputy Clerk Constance J. Davies H 24 8/75 IOU M 24 S75 10M f : , BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re. Pursuant to Section 22353 of the TRAFFIC RESOLUTION .NO 21k6-SPD CVO, declaring a Speeding sone on MIME PAM= (Rd. M01% San � Date: SEP 02 197 Ramon area (Supv. Dist. V -'San Ramon } The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT. , On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Degartment's .Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012 , the following traffic regulation is established (and other action taken as indicated) , Pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22358, this Board hereby determines that 40 miles per hour is more than is reasonable and safe on that portion of V_MLAGE PARMAY (Rd. #5401}, beginning at the intersection of 4lcosta Boulevard and extemding southerly to the .Alameda County Zine, a street idthin the criteria of Section 22358, and this Board figs that 35 mph is an appropriate and reasonable and safe rizaa facie speed lit there, and hereby so determines and declares. T.R. 1#1329, pertaining to an existing 40 mph speed limit on Village Parkway, is herby rescinded. SEP 0 2 1975 Adopted by the Board on..._........�... cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 ' i BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Re: ) Pursuant to Section 22507 of the ) TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO . pt1�-p:mt CYC, declaring a Parkin.- zone on ) SEP 197 BAIT RDFT ROAD (Rd. A-061B), Date: 5 .Ialnut Creek area . (S u p v. Dist. _TT]: slutGr4atc Y The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors RESOLVES THAT: On the basis of a traffic and engineering survey and' recommenda- tions thereon by the County Public Works Department's Traffic Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012 , the following traffic requlation is established (and other action taken as indicated) : - '--. - Pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, par.!dng is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times, on the vest side of BANCROFT ROAD (Rd. #4061B), Walmut'Creek area, beginning at a point 20 feet south of the centerline of Ydnert Road and extending southerly a distance of 60 feet. Adopted by the Board on.. cc County Administrator Sheriff California Highway Patrol T-14 sus 0Q IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA September 2 •1975 In the Matter of Approving ) and Authorizing Payment for ) Property Acquisition ) IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the following settlement and Right of Way Contract are APPROVED And Mr. Vernon L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, is AUTHORIZED to execute said contract .on behalf �of the County: Contract Payee and Reference Grantor Date Escrow Number Amount Alcosta Boulevard Lawrence A. August 7, 1975 Title Insurance $19,665.00 San Ramon Area Davidson, et ux. and Trust Company, Assessment Escrow No. ' CD=239417 District 1973-3 Road No. 5302 Environmental and planning considerations have been complied with. The County Auditor-Controller is AUTHORIZED to draw warrant in the amount specified to be delivered to the County Supervising Real Property Agent. The County Clerk is DIRECTED to accept deed_ from above-named grantor for the County of Contra Costa. The foregoing order was passed September 2, 1975 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of 'the Board of Supervisors affix6d this %nu day of September , 1g 75 . cc : Public Works Director J. R. OLSSOiJ, CLERK County Auditor-Controller County Administrator By Bonnie Boaz 0 Deputy Clark Form #20.4 m3nA,. 75-2-200 , LJ v�V. s _ Bonnie Boaz Deputy- Clerk Form #20.4 M336 avVM . In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 --01975 In the Matter of Vegetation and Debris Removals Countywide Area, Project 80. M 76-2, Work Order 4742. IT IS BY THE BOARD OSDMM that the Public Works Direetbr is authorised to arrange for the removal of vegetation and debris from various ditches throughout the County, as set forth on the. . list entitled "Job 76-2-Routine List of Ditches for Vegetation and Debris Removal," (on file in theofficeof the Public Works Depart— ment) at an estimated cost or $25,000. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of Ow Board of cc: Public Works Director supervism affixed this 2nd day of 222Lgmber 19 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ?A 4-c.._�Q.��-�De;wty,Clerk Constance J. Davies H 24 8/75 IOM I RECEIVED, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 255 GLRCIER DRIVE, MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 9455 S E -z 1975 J. R. OlSSON ISOPS JCB DMP 76-2 - ROUTINE LIST OF DITCHES FOR VEGETATION AND DE JII wpm of w CO. Note: The numbers in parentheses indicate the clauses under which ' the work fits the provisions of the Drainage Maintenance Policy (Board Resolution 72/17). WEST COUNTY W-1 : BROOKSIDE GARDEN TRACT Roadside ditch beginning at Ninomiya (formerly Kawai) Nursery, thence westerly along Brookside Drive, thence southerly along Central Street, thence westerly along Pittsburg Avenue, thence northerly along Garden Tract Road to twin culverts leading to Drainage Zone 19 outlet ditch (North Richmond Area). (2a, 2b, 5b). W-2: DRAINAGE ZONE 19 OUTLET Ditch from Garden Tract Road to third timber bridge located about 600 feet westerly (North Richmond Area). (3b, 5a). W-3: EDWARDS Edwards Creek (a) from S.P.R.R, culverts to Loring Avenue, (b) from inlet of boy: culvert under Crockett Boulevard to downstream end of basin of School District's check dam (Crockett Area) . (2a, 2b, 5a, 5b) . W-l:: RODEO - WILLOW Ditch located about 1100 feet north of Hawthorne Drive, from Rodeo Creek to two pipes under Willow Avenue (Rodeo Area). (2a, 2b, 5b). W-5: WILART PARK \ Ditch along east side of Wil-art Park tract from freeway pipe to behind 3136 '..'i tart Drive (Richmond - San Pablo Area). (5a). W-6: CLARK ROAD DITCH Ditch starting at inlet of culvert at Clark Road and Jana Vista upstream 400-feet t (2a, 2b) . W-7: ELM14100D ROAD DITCH Ditch starting at inlet of culvert at Canyon Road upstream -`e t f culvert inlet at Elmwood Road. (2a, 2b, 2c, 5b). �� 1y lul Mw __I i WEST COUNTY (CONT.) W-9: LA PALOMA ROAD DITCH Ditch starting at outlet of culvert at Appian Way downstream 300-feet +" to junction with Appian Creek. (2b). W-9: APPIAN CREEK - FOSTER LANE Creek starting at the Foster Lane slide upstream 450-feet + to Garden Lane. (2a, 2b, 5b). W-10: APPIAN CREEK - GARDEN LANE Creek starting at Garden Lane upstream to first crossing of Appian Way_ (2a, 2b). - W-11: APPIAN' CREEK - APPIAN WAY I Creek starting at first crossing of Appian Way upstream to second crossing of Appian Way. (2a, 2b). W-12: APPIAN CREEK - APPIAN WAY 11 Creek starting at second crossing of Appian Way upstream to Rincon Road. (2a, 2b). W-13: APPIAN CREEK - RINCON ROAD Creek starting at Rincon Road upstream 250-feet + to 24-inch culvert. (2a, 2b). W-14: PEBBLE DRIVE DITCH A. Ditch starting at inlet of culvert at Appian Way upstream 600-•feet + to culvert outlet at the apartment complex. B. Ditch starting at inlet of culvert at-the apartment complex upstream 50-feet +. (2a, 2b, 2c, 5a). W-15: WILDCAT CREEK - MARKET STREET PARK Creek starting at city of Richmond city limits upstream 1700-feet + to the Market Street Park. (2a, 2b, 2c). W-!6: WILDCAT CREEK - 3rd STREET Creek starting at the Market Street Park upstream to 3rd Street. (2a, 2b). -2- VVtith7 WEST COUNTY (CONT.) W-17: WILDCAT CREEK - SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD Creek starting at 3rd Street upstream to the Southern Pacific Railroad. (2a, 2b)• ! W-18: 381 OCEAN VIEW AVENUE Ditch and stilling basin. (2a, 2b). NORTH CENTRAL COUNTY NC-l: AIRPORT - GOLF COURSE (a) Ditch along west side of airport from Arnold Highway bridge southerly to golf course, thence along edge of golf course to culvert under freeway; (b) tributary parallel to freeway on golf course side from freeway culvert to Concord Avenue; (c) outlet ditch from Arnold Highway bridge to Grayson Creek (Pacheco Area). (2a, 2b, 5b). NC-2: BUCHANAN INDUSTRIAL PARK Ditch starting at outlet of pipe behind former site of Standard Oil Station, thence northerly and easterly about 500 feet- along boundary of Buchanan Industrial Park to inlet of new pipe (Pacheco Area). (5a). NC-3: CHESTNUT AVENUE Ditch at right angles to Chestnut Avenue approximately opposite Chestnut Court, from Chestnut Avenue southerly about 350 feet to right angle bend, thence easterly about 300-feet, southerly about 150-feet, and easterly about 200-feet to outlet of pipe draining West Street (Concord Area). (5a). NC-4: CLEARLAND HEIGHTS Lined channel along east side of tract (West Pittsburg Area). (5a). NC-5: DE NORMANDIE MANOR Ditch along west tract line from culvert behind supermarket to 123 De Normandi_- Way - Morello Avenue; also outlet ditch from Pacheco Boulevard to chain link fence about 200-feet downstream. (do not clean fence or trash rack) (Martinez Area). (2b, 5a). NC-6:- EAST PLEASANT HILL ROAD Ditch along East Pleasant Hill Road from about 200-feet north of outlet of crass culvert at Barber Lane to Alhambra Creek (Martinez Area). (5a, 5b). NC-7: HOWE - PALM (New) (y; Ditch from culvert under Pacheco Boulevard located about 350-feet east -3- 1w3_ r .NORTH CENTRAL COUNTY (CONT.) NC-7: HOWE - PALM (Hew) ((Cont.)) ' of Howe Road southerly and westerly to Sycamore Street (extended); (b) . ,.., ditch from Veale Avenue westerly along north line of Martinez Little League Ballpark property; (c) ditch on vacant lot between 667 and 701 Palm Avenue. Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b). NC-8: PACHECO FIRE HOUSE Ditch behing firehouse, from Blackwood Drive to Grayson Creek (Pacheco Area). (2a, 5b). NC-9: PLEASANT HILL MANOR Ditch along west and north sides of tract to culvert under Willow Pass Road (Pleasant Hill - Concord Area). (5a). NC-10: SANTA FE - MONTEREY Open ditch portions of system from intersection of Almond and Santa Fe Avenues to about 60-feet upstream of Monterey Avenue (Martinez Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b). NC-11: VINE HILL GARDENS Ditch from Sewage Plant Road to Rodriques Avenue (Martinez Area). Right of entry required. (5b). NC-12: YGNACIO VALLEY OUTLET Open ditch portions of Storm Drain Maintenance District No. 1 system from Pine Creek at Fox Way to Treat Boulevard (Concord Area)_ (3b, 5a). NC-13: MORELLO HEIGHTS DRIVE DITCH Ditch along north side of A.T. S S.F. Railroad from Morello Avenue upstream 500- feet + to drainage structure. (2a,-2b). N£-14: MACMURTY DRIVE DITCH Ditch from end of Macmurty Drive downstream 400-feet + to main ditch. (2a, 2b). WALNUT CREEK AREA WA-1 : ACALANES VALLEY ESTATES Ditch along north tract line paralleling EBMUD right of way from Reliez Creek to two side drains approximately 600-feet upstream (Lafayette - Walnut Creek Area). (2b, 5b). -4- 00841 .. a :a.. -4- 00 341 WALNUT CREEK AREA (CONT.) WA-2: ALVARADO - WOO-TEN Ditch starting at intersection of Alvarado Avenue and Wooten Drive, thence ;.:.; northerly and easterly about 300-feet to first cross fence (Walnut Creek Area). .. • Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 56)_ WA-3: ARLENE GARDENS Ditch from drop inlet about 500-feet north of Arlene Drive southerly across Arlene Drive to two pipes under Orchard Lane (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required. (5b). WA-4: CASTLE HILL ROAD Ditch from Castle Hili Road opposite end of Meadow Lane, northerly to Tice Creek (Walnut Creek Area). (5a). WA-5: DALE COURT Ditch paralleling extension of Dale Court from "bullring" to pipe outlet about 200-feet upstream (Walnut Creek Area). (5a). WA-6: ESSENAY AVENUE Ditch from Larkey School culvert to about 100-feet upstream of Essenay Avenue (Walnut Creek Area)_ (5a). WA-7: HOOKSTON - BUSKIRK (New) Open ditch portion of system from intersection of Hookston Road and Buskirk Avenue to Walnut Creek Manor fence line (Walnut Creek - Pleasant Hill Area). (2a, 2b, 5a, 5b)• WA-8: KENDALL ROAD Ditch along southerly side of 179 Kendall Road (Walnut Creek Area). (2a, 2b, 5b)_ WA-}: LAS.JUNTAS - BUS KIRK Ditch from outlet of culverts under BART station across Las Juntas Way to box culvert behind office building at 3126 Buskirk Avenue (Walnut- CreekPleasant !ii l I Area)- (5a, 5b). 00342 -5- WALNUT CREEK AREA (CONT.) WA-10: MAGNOLIA - WILLOW Ditch starting at easternmost leg of Magnolia Way, thence westerly and southerly' ' to private bridge about 100-feet west of Willow Avenue; also side ditch draining Park Avenue (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required for part of th i s work. (5a, 5b). WA-11 : MAYHEW PARK Ditches: (a) along east tract line, thence along Mayhew Way to cross culvert; (b) in center of tract from south tract line across Ludell Drive to ditch (a): (Pleasant Hill - Walnut Creek Area). (5a). WA-12: McCONNELL ACRES Gerry Court and Golden Hill Court outlet ditch along south tract line of McConnell Acres, thence southerly to Mountain View Boulevard (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required for off-tract portion of this work. (5a,. 5b). WA-13: NORLYN (Revised) Ditch behind 120 through 160 Norlyn Drive (Walnut Creek Area), also side ditch between 150 and 160. (5a)- WA-14: RELIEZ VALLEY ESTATES Ditch from EBMUD right of way across Acalanes Avenue and Palomeres Street to Ortega Street; also outlet ditch leading to culvert under.freeway ramp (Lafayette - Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required for part of this work. (5a: 5b). WA-15: SANS CRAINTE (a) Sans Crainte Creek main channel from San Ramon Creek to culvert under San Miguel Drive located just north of Margaret Drive intersection; (b) side ditch fron main channel across..Herron Avenue to Celeste .Avenue; and (c) .side ditch along west side of San Miguel Drive from main channel -to Rudgear Road (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5a, 5b).' WA-16: S.P.R.R. - VIA ROBLES Ditch along east side of Southern Pacific Railroad from end of Via Robles to about 600-feet southerly (Walnut Creek Area) . Right of entry required. (2b, 5b). WA-17: TICE VALLEY - :OLYMPIC Ditch behind Texaco Station from Tice Valley Boulevard to Olympic Boulevard (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required. (5b). o0 3�r1 -6- - WALNUT CREEK AREA (CONT.) WA-18: WALNUT BOULEVARD Ditch starting at culvert under Sierra Lane, thence northerly along east side of Walnut Boulevard to right angle bend opposite Brasero Lane, ' thence easterly and northerly to southeast corner of 125 Marshall' Drive; also through 1099 Ygnacio Valley Road (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b). WA-19: WEBB - LANCASTER Ditch from about 200-feet downstream of Webb Lane to about 300-feet upstream of Lancaster Road (Walnut Creek Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b)'. WA-20: WOODSIDE ACRES Tract outlet ditch along east side of Southern Pacific Railroad just south of Mayhew Road (Walnut Creek - Pleasant Hill Area). (5a). WA-21 : PINE CREEK - LANE DRIVE Creek from BART crossing upstream to Lane Drive (2a, 2b, 5b). WA-22: DIABLO VIEW ACRES DITCH Ditch from culvert at Diablo View Road upstream 900-feet {. (2a, 2b). SOUTH CENTRAL COUNTY SC-1: CAMEO ACRES Ditches in Cameo Acres and adjacent tracts: (a) Main ditch from Clydesdale Drive just east of Maiden Lane to a point approximately 200-feet upstream from stub end of Plaza Circle; (b) side ditch along back line of lots on west side of Vista Del Diablo (Danville Area). Right of entry required for (b). (5a, 5b)- SC-2: CAMINO VERDE Ditch starting at pipe inlet behind 71 Alta Loma Court, thence easterly and southerly about 600-feet to pipe outlet behind 118 Redondo Way (Danville Area): . (5a). SC-3: DEAN - MARKS Ditch parallel to Marks Road from outlet of pipes at Dean Road intersection to about 200-feet downstream (Alamo Area). Right of entry required (2a, 5b). -7- 344 SOUTH CENTRAL COUNTY (CONT.) SC-4: EL PINTADO WEST (a) , Ditch from La Gonda Way opposite north end of St. Isidore's Church to f 60-inch culvert under El Pintado West, (b) side ditch from (a) to end of Parrot Place (Danville Area) . Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b)- SC-5: EL RINCON - LA QUESTA Ditch from El Rincon Road to south side of 331 La Questa Drive (Danville Area). (5a). SC-6: FAHRNEY DITCH Lined ditch parallel to southwesterly side of S.P.R.R. from San Ramon Creek (at trestle south of Danville) southeasterly about 1600-feet to upstream end of lining (Danville Area). (5a). SC-7: FAIRWAY DRIVE Ditch from Clydesdale Drive along north side of church property to Fairway Drive, thence northeasterly about 400 feet to golf course maintenance road (Danville Area). Right of entry required for part of this work. (5a, 5b). SC-8: GARY WAY Ditch in Jones Walnut Acres tract from end of Gary Way northerly to tract line, thence easterly to S.P.R.R. (Danville - Alamo Area) . (5a) . SC-9: GLENWOOD Tract outlet ditch along westerly side of Danville Highway from D.Z_ 10, Line A channel to where ditch turns under subdivision fence (Danville - Alamo Area) . (5a). SC-10: INA COURT Ditch from outlet of culvert draining end of Ina Court to about 300-feet daynstream (Alamo Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b). SC-11: LA GONDA COURT Ditch along back line of lots on south side of La Gonda Court (Danville Area) . (5a)• SC-12: LAS LOMITAS (Revised) (a) Lined channel from culvert outlet about 100-feet east of Lomitas Drive, across Lomitas Drive, thence westerly parallel to and between Camino Tassaj ara ' and Gil Sias Road, thence southerly to arch culvert under Camino Tassaj ara -8- UMM-5- SOUTH CENTRAL COUNTY (CONT.) SC-12: LAS LOMITAS (Revised) ((Cont.)) (b) short section of ditch behind 247 Ramona Road, (c) ditch along back Line of 134 through 184 Molitas Road (Danville Area) . (5a). NOTE: The ditch along Camino Tassajara has been replaced by a pipe. SC-13: LAURENITA Ditch along north and east lot lines of 1490 Laurenita Way (Alamo Area)_ (5a. 5b). SC-14: PODVA ROAD Ditch from right angle bend in Podva Road southerly along private road about 700-feet to outlet of pipe draining Ocho Rios Drive (Danville Area). (5b). SC-15: SIERRA VISTA Ditch along west line of Rancho San Ramon Heights, Unit No. 2, from end of Camino Court to Green Valley Creek, including side ditches draining ends of Camino Court and Sierra Vista Place (Danville Area). (5a). SC-16: S=P.R.R. - NORTH OF- ALAMO (Revised) Ditches along east side of railroad from Hillgrade Avenue to twin culverts under tracks about 600-feet north of Cervato Drive and from West Livorna Road to 36" railroad cross culvert located about 1 ,000-feet south of Ridgewood Road, also side ditch along north side of West Livorna Road from railroad to West Livorna section of Lunada Lane (Alamo Area). Right of entry required.: (2a, 2b, 5a, 5b)- SC-17: b).SC-17: S.P.R.R. - SAN RAMON GOLF COURSE Ditches along west side of railroad: (a) from Alcosta Boulevard northerly to golf course property line; (b) from Oak Creek northerly� to outlet of culvert draining Sedgefield Avenue (San Ramon Village Area). (5a) . Si-18: VIA DON JOSE Ditch along back line of lots on north side of Via Don Jose (Alamo Area). (5a). SC-19: WOODVIEW (Revised) Ditch from southerly stub end of Cervato Drive section of Lunada Lane easterly to S.P.R.R. , thence along westerly site of railroad to grin culverts under tracks located about 600-feet north of Cervato Drive (Alamo Area). (5a). -9- hr SOUTH CENTRAL COUNTY (CONT.) SC-20: LOVE LANE DITCH Ditch from culvert outlet downstream 182-feet +. (2b) . - > SC-21 : SAN RAMON CREEK Creek from bridge at Greenbrook Drive upstream 200-feet +. (2a, 2b, 5a)- SC-22: NORTH BRANCH GREEN VALLEY CREEK Creek from junction with main channel upstream to Green Valley Court. (2b, 5b) . SC-23: GREEN VALLEY CREEK - FREEWAY Creek from freeway upstream to Bueno Court. (5b). SC-24: GREEN VALLEY CREEK - BUENO COURT Creek from Bueno Court upstream to first crossing of Diablo Road. (5a, 5b). SC-25: GREEN VALLEY CREEK - DIABLO ROAD I Creek from first crossing of Diablo Road upstream to new flood control channel - (5a). hannel _(5a). SC-26: GREEN VALLEY CREEK - DIABLO ROAD 11 Creek from second crossing of Diablo Road upstream to the junction of the Borth Branch of Green Valley Creek. (2a, 5b). SC-27: GREEN VALLEY CREEK - GREEN VALLEY ROAD Creek from culvert at Green Valley Road upstream to Clydesdale Drive. (2a, 5a). EAST COUNTY E-t : B`'ROI - CAIN. DIABLO Ditch from culvert under Camino Diablo just east of Bryon Highway to about 400-feet easterly (Byron Area). Right of entry required. (2a, 2b, 5b). ORINDA AREA ' 6R-1: OVERHILL DITCH Ditch from culvert at Overhill and Glorietta Boulevard downstream 150-feet + (2b). OR-2: DARYL DRIVE DITCH (a) Ditch from culvert at Daryl Drive and Glorietta Boulevard downstream 100-feet +. (b) Ditch from culvert at #34 Daryl Drive downstream to main ditch. (2b, 5a).. OR-3: IVY DRIVE DITCH (a) Ditch from culvert at 176 Ivy- Drive upstream 200-feet t. (b) Ditch from culvert at 176 Ivy Drive downstream 175-feet + to main ditch. (c) Main ditch 175-feet ± upstream of junction. " . (d) Main ditch 125-feet T downstream of junction. (2a, 2b, 5a). OR-4: EASTON COURT DRAINAGE Structures at 15, fl] and #22 Easton Court. (5a). 00348 -I1- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 ___, 1975 In the Matter of installation of Drop inlet, Martins Areas Project No. DMP 76-3, Work Order 4743. The Public Yorks Director having requested authorization to install a drop inlet in an existing at drain system is the Martinez area at a cost of $18800# stating that said project is- a Glass 1 categorical exemptiOn from environmental impact report requirements; IT IS BY M BOARD ORDUM that the aforesaid request is APPROVED. PA,%= by the Board on September 2s 1975« I hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid 1N'�tness my hand and the Seal of the Board of sat Public Yorke Director Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 ? eatR. OLSSON, Clerk Clerk Constance J. Davies H 24 W75 IOM In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 In the Matter of Request for Construction of Major Road Segments, San Ramon Area. The Board on July 28, 1975 having requested the Public Works Director to report on a letter from Mr. Michael Wahlig, Director, San Ramon Homeowners Association, P. 0. Box 54, San Ramon, California 94583 asking that the Public Works Depart- ment be directed to study the need for completion of construction of three major north-south roads (Tareyton Avenue, Davona Drive and Broadmoor Drive) through to Montevideo Drive, San Ramon area, and to explore the possibility of establishing an assessment dis- trict to finance said construction; and The Public Works Director this day having submitted his report, a copy of which is attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein, stating that formation of an assessment dis- trict seems unnecessary in light of the imminent development of subdivisions which will insure completion of additional access roads; and The Board having considered and concurred with the report, receipt of same is ACKNOWLEDGED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Mr. M. Wahlig Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors Works Director Director of Planning affixed this 2nd day of September, 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H za 12174 • 15-M Mildred 0. Ballard ir,,t,�r► . N Report B. PINE VALLEY ROAD - San Ramon Area On July 28, 1975, the Board of Supervisors referred a July 15, 1975 letter from the San Raison HomeoYmers Association to the Public Works Department for report. The letter urged the completion of Tareyton Avenge, Davona Drive and Broadmoor Drive through to Montevideo Drive, and requested that the Public Ifors Department study the need for the completion and the possibility of using an Assessment District-to con- struct the missing segments. The letter from the Homeowners Association adequately ey_- plains the current traffic situation -nd the necessity for additional access. There are presently about 1,000 homes and a high school which must use the Pine Valley Road freeway undercrossing or Tareyton Avenue to the south as access, and the latter is a long, circuitous route through several sub- divisions. New subdivisions will provide five additional access roads. However, these subdivisions have been held up due to unavail- ability of adequate sewer service. A new sewer pumping station is now being constructed and will provide the necessary service in the near future. The letter from the Homeowners Association also inquires as to whether an Assessment District could be formed to construct the missing links. While an Assessment District could be formed, the lacr related to assessment districts specifies that the cost be spread to the benefiting owners_ This would involve not only the subdividers, but several hundred homeowners and the school district. Such an approach would be very time-consuming- (Continued on next page) A G E N D A Public Works Departr-ent Page.1 of 8 September 2, 1975 Report B Continued: For these reasons an Assessment Diutrict seems impractical and un:.:ocez;sarj in light of the ir-nanant subdivision ' d'::a iopmen t. ('•:ATL TO CLERK OF THE BOARD: Please send a copy of this r ort to the San Racoon Homem-iners Association, P_ O. Box S., San Ramon, CA 94583. (LD) ' _ f IH eME BOARD 0r SU PFAIV ISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Awarding Contract } ` for Construction of a Median } _ Ssptember •2, 1975 Opening on John Glenn Drive, Concord Area, Project No. 4177-6072-) 75• Bidder Total Amount Apollo Concrete, Inc. $3,021 2001 Kendree Street Antioch, California 94509 Hess Concrete Construction Company, Inc. , Napa Peter Cole Jensen, Inc. , Danville The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that the Public tlorks Department shall -prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it with any required certificates of insur- ance, and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved theta as to form, the Public ?forks Director is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. This project is considered a Class 1c categorical exemption from environmental impact report requirements. PASSED by the Board on September 2. 1975 CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full. truer & correct copy of the original document which is on file In my office, GG: Public flocks Director and that It was parsed 1t: adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. California. on County Counsel the date shown.ATTEST: J. It_ OLSSO , County County Auditor-Controller Clerk&exofflclo Clerk of said Board of Supervisors. by Deputy Clerk. Contractor �( on SEP 0 2 1975 JOHN GLENN DRIVE Project No. 4177=6072-751 REQUEST FOR BID A Bid is requested for the following described work proposed to be constructed as noted herein: LOCATION: The project is located on John Glenn Drive , north- of Concord. Avenue in the Concord area. _ DESCRIPTION OF WORK: The work consists of curb removal and replacement , irrigation system relocation , . installation of conduits, and portland cement concrete pavement construction. Work is to be performed in accordance with the plans and " specifications enclosed herewith. Proposals are to be delivered to: VICTOR 1- . SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SIXTH FLOOR . ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 651 PINE STREET tiART I IIEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 before 2 p.m. on August 27, 1975. Bids will be opened by the Public Works Director who will reccn-;end to the Board .f Supervisors as to the: a:rard of the contract or will arrange for issuance of the purchase orderto the lowest responsible bidder , except that the Public Works Director reserves the right to reject any or all bids for cause. and to do work with County forces , to request new proposals , or - :c cancel the project . For pre-Bid information, contact : Road Design Division one ( 15) 372-2131 F L ATTACHMENTS : 975 Pronosal Plans it. otswu _ 6oAm OF 5U Specifications w • � $yam- .-_�.. ...ao �.�a.� ; a F ::•a;;tr:pyr„-�� i JONPI GLEMI DRIVE Project No. 41.77-6072,-75 P R 0 P 0 S A L The undersigned , being a duly licensed Contractor in the State of California , hereby offers to do the work necessary to complete the project as described in the Request for Bid , for the following lump sum price: Dollars And , further , the undersigned agrees to enter into contract with the County or accept a purchase order to do the work as provided above and in conformance with the following General Provisions : GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . The lump suin price shalt include full payment for furnish- ing all labor, equipment , and material necessary to complete the project as shown on the Plans . Any reference to the Standard Specifications providing for additional payment for work shoran on the plans or necessary to complete the project shall not apply. 2. Any change in the scope of work or quantity of work- will be by written order of the Engineer which Trill specify the r:ork to be done, adjustment of allotted time and the basis of compensa t ion for such w=ork. 3 . The undersigned shall complete the project within the allotted time of fifteen (15) working days, counting from and including the date stated in the Notice to Proceed . 4 . For labor performed at "force account” the percentage (S . S . Section 9- 1 .03A( lb) ) to be applied to the actual mages paid (S, S . Section 9-1 . 03A ( la) ) will be 18 percent. 5 . The undersigned .agrees to comply :rit:h all local , State , and Federal rc.luIations appiicable to labor , gage rates , hours of work, apprentices , and subcontractors. Mages paid shall be not less than the current list of prevailing wages on file in the office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 5. Neither a Faith1cul Perforwancc Bond (surety bone' nor a Labor and Materials Eons (surety bond) is required for work- done :orkdone under this contract or purchase order. 7 . In the event work is performed under contract , the County ,j i l l file a ilot i ce or Completion. upon acceptance of the completed . work by the Board of Supervisors. t JOHN: GLENPI DR[ IE Project No. 41.77-6072-75 GENERAL PROVISIONS (Continued) 8. The t..—rk sha l I be performed under the general supervision of the Public Works Director , or his authorized representative , who shall have the authority to approve or reject any portion of the work, or to order the suspension of the work for- cause. 9. Before any work is commenced on this contract , or pursuant to a purchase order , the Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director_ (a) Evidence of adequate Workmens ' Compensation Insurance (b) Certificate of Public Liability ($250,000!$500 ,000) and Property Damage Insurance ($100 ,000) . 10. By acceptance of the contract or purchase order , the undersigned agrees to save , indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Contra Costa , or its representatives , from all liabilities imposed by law by reason of injury or of death to any person or persons or damage to property which may arise out of the work covered by this contract , or performed pursuant to the purchase order and does agree to defend the County in any claim or action asserting such liability Date Company Authorized Signature Address Title California Contractor ' s (SIGNATURE TO BE f.OTARIZED) License Ho. 0 _ 2 _ ,w e..,..., ` .y x a `d -1 sar�V`?- s'�,�-e�.t�".�` t t' '„qa ..Y' .. 4. y 7:., r ""*-, t-,�t" t t;1- € art.*,'t '✓rsy-.{-n t r�I' .. t i I. Ft c i� ..'yM. .�i t .�'h �, �.;,,✓,,rl•3 Zryt^ami_. i�� }'SY _._ z ' + { 1 , w r` S 3`1....5 -,Kyr r .I• + .j - e t a q 4 21 ' t r. . n r ( ,°, a�. W .rr r �` >f~M i;- .. i►<, f ala ; -1 _ ray ar' t ` _"� r�" r Mlt'' a,Y'r, 3"`a S � 1`t-. Y IF_ d.(� �•.r viSl -� w i-7 N(f.t '�a < ..x 4 •v" r�+.,,sn t.. 1 } Il 5 O ,+';�a `y g (fes 1t: 1 .� ,. r♦ o}, e).r•. tt..�.'I { Gtt `� } a y._-,4z a rr'.,, }u_. I ,r� '7',� KA ,�. t•x� R a� jti `I ?il I 1 trR' 7 A + j F ♦�'R�, f e'i} sM!"7; t� �-'�' 3`4"trrZ:ts ',�`` 9# J- S t' £� > S t/T� a, 4 ,.5 4 0 t ?.t as$ ! .� a c aK t"rfx C? * " tµ:{ 1r '4 < i ..t�• � F O J u r �� c v 'I- ir`{ !- r WGs tZ� .1 ua9 ! 1 f 4i Z r y .Ir - f:<�raQr�v ,( u- v tt h !i �� o x a - ' ar t'J st c .r.�7 t�s ::T i c�Q"ru -:3 Tr.,' tl( ,>r �I. r f,�•<, a .,Ltd t�. �.,a F �•-„ -, }L-<:j .C::i 1:.( 1 1_ 1 �'rt rho..t� -..s"�.�c i. yi' "``h'.iryi.}''U:f `r ;moi f�:' .�1�.- ^'-j (a m Y $ 'i 1 r cC.l, a rt, 1 1.i ;-:; ,a 1 t rip c t:� e a � � v u/ Q'�tns k y '"Ll�'ra ,`.,' r H a as ti 4 •XA'ws'�- u.n '°' . - (-L7 :_^ n -u n. Q 1 :£ a•:u no 'u k-r "a - $v r t .,r ��,},tea ;o Sa SI $ a P� -s:l "a ,.;S <r -e(i •(.`Y n A 1\i'.(L�'i"0 �� Y � t ..r f.♦ n G r: -'� 5 r ; s ..>a• a z v1... Y r v`l�k CESS `4' �e i(.'�Y!•t(`♦'.Wf- s u 4 i �,',( -rL a r 7 i( Z E F}-� I t o"7 k'M .� Yr�. t J7 c V nc�?es=`` � �_,� r�4 Sri. •Y L.�-' 1 a 6 t t r�,=l '` r.: L Z' ..1.}<F Z` a` y c x 'tv tf _F (I.m r t , i O f 4j, ,�-Sw -1' h a• +i -.ri�I r .:s Y+1'.tr 2 G"I , rR'.1. �--- (t O x}w r a n.. Gr. h ! ; -:,Y W;�' ",' xw .._Q1.m?T' i.X ikr��-•. ( o .+ -�." d1 (• Q v j ,..1 . r I s r,t. S�$.+y z.4f�i+J Jiyy +� ,y s, Ii J d 4 1..�'L'�a ,4 (� r 5v'4` t t fc c a.ry.^. �4ch l at'�7 z, . fr Yc.:. r ',:i H .0] .(i . - W ♦' .- it s,# o �,('��`3�4.4 ' i (!1 ; f l?j. a a' as U'a �J . L au `y r O �'S F (: `.x _� z...� b Is Y„-s,x,Ux( v^Y + 7 t- t Q 4 t __ s r , . a f" Z. r „_F-f r 4 •a J Y.-c I S. - t ..• +. \q .r,F+� ��" r"' N O l ,. I � •'i•�,o:ri ,r r e->-�a+ ri: 7 cr,..itg t ,y .�`.�!y-mak£. ��. .; }{ i I_ -fA i E i 's 7 n= �rccr;.`i a'� i✓ 4i�._�u�, fi:,;(1L *'s^, 'r +,i" '.'="+:.p , r v,.j L�. i _. cur s Y r# r a, yj , �. , ,1 ''Z ce 'r`'l� S _x Q ';.£ �Fsra ,� g;.:.. $ d.,�vnsi` ,'.�.�c'1 :c :.:�r,£t- Q W 4 G. 7j g 4. w 7rt C].- ac J lJd c-,, She•^' 'a ".f-: Y }o ^ ♦r�� 3 5-to rat/ �rfii i+«t Ute, 1 �i R.'. v ( O r _ orS 3 ..0 n(rr Y L. SS s '�ev 7 t t„{ y 'r N -,�, r '(S�4 s y� to c g. s�' • l cA '�. �1-4tf r -`Y' F 3 fk .,. j u l; a t•'L W ofa E O .y7 a,,lA-, rZot �.3'ro.-{ ,L'T.A.l J'SS't iE'4' d.. r. Ka J C'O C r,-' J G- Y 'Lr' .� 'c i $ i 0 4( \ *n ri ' O o w2 fSYa a caT'a(. 1f'�i}� cI u 4 ry t. _:r,` - -v,(a*t n.�• Z v Es «i .�•..I:a-' wr.J.f fi r(.•��cti� +kr"k �'` r" _ q i' .r.,a r-•( .« a n $•,...`. '3 ".n.zr rs o a ch'a j'3 . Gs, r S' ` x eQ-t - t u n u� q33 : ,(, F'. a ��,�:e� {� r .� u r�lt,,7e a�t%Z'L'r-V.. ;�l...c.u�.y 1t�. " a •Std R } o r F.i «4L i £ .v, I a. ;'3< l a a. +�' F "^r+, p.Ir•I• ci W r+3k n M..'7'q '.,;^`•cf �t`yF.y ';t c K 3 S4..r1 V T a. 4 iS:.l tw ,J> x 14I Lr y,( t •c'- y fi'�,7?y 'Li •2'I d br a•♦; : d w^ri. �u Z o r }� a tG 1 z moi.<:al..•I`�-tit ru f+ ..�;{RS 5,t"" za3�� l�y�'�1:e_ :w V ,� 1 . q. W s� « �� ]S�,y }u W -n 3� - 2'+�i t•d�. Cf 3"l �rl:Ll.'• .Y/. .-1•l�/ W V. l a' t W 4D+r� ) r y j',Q.LCI(i> '• Kk.3 uc�s t �*i �,.I- T Iff f :. r } �:, a �'� ! r,I E_ (rl S o�''a o L .,t o s. -Y?s u i I;-G,u( g i" i`Ft3.f• -'t . 1'' art < .ti•. ' - ':8� y e ",f,".�♦ 'ar •" R:�>r S 4 !J ``d s iF•''r•aa.f '...,1, t .r. .S��l i- .i"" £ / ( O�. $ G;. S c y,x av-a .S'o >.u.ra a t of-a,' ,^l t 't. ga'(fi, rLt"i�¢ t f 3-I a (`t o.L' Hao"l0 ,-a;y�� ; 1 -_t .I iti co• ra 7a n - 5 a i "'r rr : ,a ,,tyi`'., „,,,r- 9 j. ."fi 1 1 i }: d, >q �.� a .c.c[ w rl t +.zx- �,�: ^}„fi.F yit d try aa5>.-" ', tt- A" u' 2 r. : . O T > ,a< z f�2s, S �-. rn i q-� ii. i IT' N'Z u:L.�. . ,p'._i - .�" s r y.. bfr .£ E' ` '?"_ J'+a`4t". ' 1.;. ° t k , i.tl Y •.. M a} ':l of 4, b r r t4 ,.f .:+mt r '°s'''� L I � _t. ., � �*'r rt at•'• r v ►- O G; 7 l G.�d� k �j �''S �� '`9!•i TT�y � 1 1 � 1 r 4; ( lttl•[. Z r t y y;,,1 �' o tf t t'°' rt x "K ` ",,..rr F=... J w .+ 4 r�s .r..,..., k{v v3. fy.I �" �'i4y wW _L - s v u�v.x 'Ss', R ,. a"_ K `•s + t. (.7 i tt ;1 fJ _ J'r d y { o r ar✓ :Q 'r`- W tt R 'r-' iI�"��7e.t i wsu j c « c N G c S--r .:X� t ?r3�'!ijx� 7•� hL �>rt '' r :!n +.t u o n s'lv 1i..� o' r� U t 'F'y.'� -rC •' n ^n- ",� ,(r s. n rI C;¢,7 L'• w•e L"; I+ ,nu ur S .. Ct ''A t n3- ('Y?'�. i�C)e.' +1�• SKY' t y...., :� Y » N t a' O•f�. _ �• r S G ; { [•O G7'.y,,� h)J 2.11.. J tr' z .� �: :u < •a 4.r u nor", i V r * r �4.,`- +.0.", ♦ `Io «:.• r v 1 °..-::u� N j' v uo r .:` crf /ij. �1, cQ �Isi �3•ft_. rt o-ua .. .O :, 4.::a` � ♦I :a ,X ::J• ,IY rTTt•••"`'"•=I .xtc d' •�''` L r� .^.`. •"(�j�?a7' =lr ro ;q�u o<: a1 r-..« o .W i u:'7o vt•'��' a�� 'yy'r ?u-!` ` vri L:UT�r_,,.�K^.3{ r' ��,<jr .W :.i'_ !, t L "-0 v' « r•..t 3 ,�`{,`,` � >r 'r+, (rt ; iY. p x Q -: • n r 4 v.e t G {u{ ��y-� 7�;. a � .,.- i''t� �� ',�;r�s`Z 1 �Y' "" \ii ttc.. .:L it -:ma . +i • t S C s m� ,,,,,p � k 121 i_. 'fiat .. q f f 1'S:, a,c.` fi �� {{ _ e. 11 -J t a e?,♦b': 1,t s n. t . �'oTL, 6 Ie -a ,"- r 7 v �t a`r � o :Q s i A c, �'� k i' \ 4"(.�µ�cf :a't !oi4.1j�C .+'; s�'krY Z°�. ( ,-41 ;u r .•� l/� o-n a - -:W 10 �.c n 1�K c'• .++ai,tr-t3 r'I-; / ;c t kr.. }C Y Lt sy• Y_ __ 'Q a� i.,� o : 8 ' -t-Z o ', :,5,,.,±,'"�('a2. ; 'L�:.o L"r}i O }"^ < dh •- �: ., „.� 4 ::.yrs ,y4a,� ti: i+a .:.r r 'W c �.,u •.ot F ..3 vll� ,z p� €3:� ��c4;.��`,r, m T'' r > '�y'� ''"�; -' i -":. E v i.,c :a :t9 c - r t `-...,. a<T` Glia' YY «'}j�'max wt, a_ y N�o 1:uL Z'a�r t� :w o � a. or v v4 .l�c-'' `$ I- .: „ZI'+ a},- C.:- n c( E �..> c :.!l ',,. f :i h'$.'.3'iS'rm v Sys 4'iZ rg a,. 4 - < '.:, r .. N f t r„� c to '.o t _ ° a "'t q �* "r z `a .(y c o 4.., '5_ ,c.� �> •+:.,T .' .t11.'ar t). G 1.y (a �.n ;` r i'" z• M V.uCti . ern. a'= ,r.d r:.:i'Kb ':.Z;EFIn;S s:t£ t # a> Fiv - Tm o. tn h st ver, cy� a #`fy i�' _ ry -rr rl N-M - i-ri aI a. am as ''o ,,,,, t�.�'�"` �gnate3 4>.»�,.' 1 i�+.' .( Vick' c% c^ ors,moi a`,,t^Y' ",�,�� .,� A 5 , ( hr r.� u l 1 x t Yjl Y',AY(t2... �.� bl a-N` .}"- �I -s*d�- a�r7'r �� t �r c 3 .�, c n S • a 1 i..�C .y 5111,;u r .`. .�ih:".: •:1 r a \ W �, 1-` a k? (-%-t'Y a U',,;- r ;"'a w a a "": ' 7. r Y W y t,c v♦: -U •I ?; r}x 't f i�K� .sr' ;..s. E a. 'r:,u •.". _ �.0 u� U ,' t �_- n c_4 .J < ;i ,. i ',f /Utz F 'Q �� Ik nv,`'-•`wX„" .,� i i i 1: (: Y 'i ✓,I _yep-� .. P 3% -7 Y :Ll 7 1 N 41 N' l�j. O. r( ..t F 1 N r, e � k s d U •-w. -,;+7a � .__ :( Cil l� '4 =a41 _ s * �r'r(f k c`- •' J r n. 1 �yv .*t,Y-tee.:..,.- �'\ (.. t « ( � �' i, N - -. v-.-t 1� � S ;�F 1 - �� jrr} <<n�t� l'�'iti'{H�ei' t� -s. U1 f s ..i. (. p1 -i u - . .�, r•{{ n� 7 a tai 5 ul t:: o Cr.k, tF 'iff�' _ �� " n r' a 1 �12.r^"'['d' .W '.o r i ��r �'� lJ �� u v=- 'r I'°I.r ttll 1 4 0 7 tl1 G. r... ♦ C1 >0 o t h- A yk 44 A. n.. Ti_ t , _y, 1` _V o> ff 4 f( t ia" 1 :� t.., $ -'�'"r 8y .:TI .`♦ .Y t u.• JTr ';s F t _� a i z r { " i- •n" 3t'7S r.�r. y„a. F u a a u a {- L _ t \ o +.Ick f a d .. u c r YS •, r f# ''S`* ' ^SY ''.S E N t r ( f yua. C "'i n4 "1-t Sy` .- �.i _ F.a�: } + •w �a= 1 i �y ov _ H£ > hs':": �i`"�zyI7�'-'. E ^v t :'� *'O -E'a s�T' S+, ,`k oy, s ,4�. "L q{ M 2 K# g�,kp;.--y.:•{�`," oo r .� v". ".2 i Y t,� S.. Yo. q } S�' 3• `i �tau� #"".+.�� 4 o a. j.c '.iL. a♦ kn !L ..c o si`� '-r 1 `' -i".,rt„15: 1� u, ' 'I L T .1oS �Y t,r 7 7 - {! € �f i. r`-v.•`+ y a. 'J=��" nr� - f t t [k r 1 x .1..' ,�.� ! "1. .M t a ?S "'r"3 F,.^s"'�1T�"j gr.•ra.*.4.Yr.• _ _ r Y 4 e v if "�..r Y r ":�5 a< �''.+ - i' t(1f s<T+•'La`",y' k� eL F k 3 r L e ri y L 2 ^ t }� % t$rn3.Y as w _'v 3 0 ^Ai 9 kx� ST �... s s i. it r �,n.rs M :.i'�-�:�, .,,.,x t�.r» r Gk?s rt,'4c+.c^,-tiw -v '. _ ._ _ _ _ _.. ._.,.�_.. _..._.•.. _,-.,.- ....._. _.__.. I • • i' • • 1 J-1 •L w ~ j`- •:- i, �� • !- •�'�'-ii•O X11 ••t i� O � a1 Ml ICE<r~•Y a iI • ••t f .:' •� a- •• • /0.O.a�IrllY • L+ • •r -. • �7t 3a�. 3: • >t . .• i w > -"3-z ! • e �- ; 3:r X i 13jt•�+l+:s/i• j ■ tqp F lam.- a INS BIS r Selo* 96 OL V- ! •�f �• O •Li , N 3 Y •~ P-� :Ratio\. ii y• s rte•i • f �f i �S asi= oaf FA sa` • •'Y • \�■wyd�.�a "'1 �• �w .�.. Y 1- s•• �� •• ;� � •LJ us US F I ra Y ci" 02.6 xz ON aa- aSs 3Z M ' ' 6 ,�,�, _ �rrf�)1,�• � � •'• y PY o i Is rid w'i i'�'�•�f Ylow YZ: 1, ` a- ir + Ira �•� a�.s•_... _ . ly :: Y r i >. • I' , .r+ •1 t .� ± �o . 1 ZS"a;�w s ICwq 1 Saw• aI•/T s ire a fA t\ —• • t C. i s'31 —9 •; W Yrs r x 4L a: '•. •..p e iS�! VVZ i• .:iia O= g :` r•- •M� 6• : > O a= ,^• -Of ` .2671 .•1 � V' w•K r•. trr r __ t� %�• �i � ; i' � .i, � � =: •• .air T M p ; =t.• • ••Z iw�' �-1 •w+ 0 l v a • x 3L� • �� < aX s.' a zi-g s32-+a are fy -t a:: 1 : . 0 r as r ve t. rot it - a".. Ax��'< . rN Q. ?.W A t C g A p tr s, es► + e+ }_rte rrn- 14. 10 { -Op '{J► '� �.� ... parr ''.t' .` �'��`�� G ..: , •�i0 �.;.: flan' Xe v -a► IL in rn U n 4 �, M nit f 4•a'?moi o 614 h Vit;,o '� • .,,4 n fia a p of 2 cli CN ta C., cck '*CA ' O r 9r i 4 lT}i u �31A W w lit 3 t;, �` y�! t" " 8 a gti + Vic` { "'., • u pq u r tat tt 1 ACL ` 0., Q.L1 q•a ti -. ? t tt O u � '�.xa �• `p`'�',' VIA � �3 a �- � It jr, O C D a .; 'Z •.. �; .. oft tla ' itCk + A G TA CA Vt Is IV 7p Ott t21 nfb Xr- it coo w au # x �tis � -.�.. CIO o O ^C m .•r � G M .N 'd9 �2 �°G pr' 114 TEE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - In the Matter of Awarding Contract ) for Construction of a Rear Yard ) September• 2, 1975 Drainage System, Canyon Road, ) Moraga Area, Prdject No. 2631-4165- ) 75. Bidder Total Amount Remmil Corporation of Oakland $1 ,818 2?30 Adeline Street 091cl and, California 94000 Peter Cole Jensen, Inc. , Danville The above-captioned project and the specifications therefor being approved, bids being duly invited and received by the Public Works Director; and The Public Works Director recommending that the bid listed first above is the lowest responsible bid and this Board concurring and so finding; IT IS ORDERED that the contract for the furnishing of labor and materials for said work is awarded to said first listed bidder at the listed amount and at the unit prices submitted in said bid; and that the Public :,forks Department shall prepare the contract therefor. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it with any required certificates of insur- ance., and the County Counsel has reviewed and approved them as. to form, the Public Works Director is authorized to sign' the contract for this Board. This project is considered a Class 1c categorical exemption fron environmental impact report requirements. - PASSED be the Board on Septerioer 2. 1975 CERTIFIED COPY the fy that this lit a Original doer tueat which bo on file mue & correct y office. cc: Public t.orks Director and that it was iwssed .L• adopted by the Board of - County Counsel t e date shown.visors of Contra JCountr- California, on County Auditor-Controller Clerk b eso[[lcio Clerk of said Board o of Supervisors. r°uty Contractor by Deputy Clerk. ,CX«� iuoa SEP 02 1975 0 4: yr x y: 0 ' a I 0M9 i CANYON 'ROAD Project.. No.' 2631-41.65-75 REQUEST FOR BID A Bid is requested for the following described work proposed to be constructed as noted herein: LOCATION: The project is located in the rear yard of a County owned house at 21 Hammond Place, in the Town of Moraga. The property backs on the easterly side of Canyon Road. DESCRIPTION OF WORK: The work consists of furnishing and installing a yard drainage system, removing and replacing curb, gutter sidewalk and conform pavement in accordance with the Plans and Specifications enclosed herewith. Proposals are to be delivered to: VICTOR W. SAUER, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SIXTH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 before 2 p.m. on August 27, 1975. Bids :ciil be opened by the Public tiorks Director who will recommend to the Board of Supervisors as to the award of the contract or will arrange for issuance of the purchase order to the lowest responsible bidder, except that the Public Works Director reserves the right to reject any or all bids for cause, and to do work with Cc::nty forces, to request new proposals, or to cancel the project. ATTACHMENTS: F I L D For pre-Bid Informtion, Contact: Proposal ? _ Road Design Division Plans jt�--� 1975 Phone' (415) 372-2131 Specifications J. a WSW Clay BOA"OF SUXv�vtSORs sPU c �M.N Canyon Road Project No. 2634-4165-75 P R O P O S A L The undersigned , being a duly licensed Contractor in the State of California, hereby offers to furnish all labor, -equipment., and material required, and to do the work necessary to complete the project as described in the Request for Bid in accordance with plans and specifications therefor for the following lump sum price: Dollars (S ) . And, further, the undersigned agrees to enter into contract with the County or accept a purchase order to do the work as provided above and in conformance with the following General Provisions: GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 . The undersigned shall complete the project within allotted time of fifteen ( 15) working days, counting from and including the date staffed in the notice to proceed as the starting date. Said notice to proceed will be issued by the County Public Works Department, Construction Division. 2. The undersigned agrees to comply with all local , State,' and i•ederat regulations applicable to labor, wage rates, hours of work, apprentices, and subcontractors. Mages paid shalt be not less than the current list of prevailing wages on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 3. Neither a Faithful Performance Bond (surety bond) nor a Labor and Materials Bond (surety bond) is required for work done under this contract or purchase order. 4. In the event work is performed under contract, the County tiit ! file a Notice of COMpletions` uDon acceptance of the completed work by the Board of Supervisors. 5. The work shall be performed under the general supervision of the Public Works Director, or his authorized representative, who sha l ! have the authority to approve or reject any portion of the work, or to order the suspension of the work for cause. 6. For Changes in Work: ( 1 ) Payment (or credit) required to compensate for author- ized changes in the scope of wort; or quantity of work required by the County shall be made in accordance with provisions" of a supplemental written order for the change_ 4 Canyon Road Project No. 2631-4165-75 GENERAL PROVISIONS (Continued) 6, For Changes in Bork: (Cont. ) (2) Force Account: As used here, "force account"-deans the method of calculating payment for labor, equipment and/or- materials based on actual cost plus specified percentages to cover overhead and profit for Mork not included as a bid item in the. contract. When extra work is to be paid for on a force account basis, com- pensation will be determined in accordance with the provisions in. Section 9-1 ,03 of the Standard Specifications (S.S. ) as modified herein. A. Labor: The actual wages to be paid, as defined in S. S. Section 9-1 .03A( la), will be considered to be the 'pre- vailing wage rates in effect at the time the labor is performed, . and no revision of payment for labor already performed will be made for any retroactive increases or decreases in such wage rates. Premium mage rates will not be paid for any labor. employed on force account work unless such rates 'have been approved, in writing, by the Engineer. The percentage (S.S. Section 9-1 . 03A( lb) ) to be applied to the actual wages paid (S.S. Section 9-1 .03A ( la)) wil'i be 18 percent. B. Equipment: The equipment rental rates to be paid for each classification of equipment shall be the prevailing rates approved by the Board of Supervisors for rental of equipment to Contra Costa County, which are in effect at the time the equipment is used. The rental rate list is available at the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Business and Services Division. No payment will be made for idle time due to breakdown, lack of operator, weather conditions prohibiting work,, or other circumstances beyond the control of the County. The provisions in S.- S. Section 9-1 .03A(3a)` shall apply with these modifications: ( 1 ) Equipment shall be c:elivered to the job equipped as ordered; (2) idle time, or time to complete rigging of the equipment as ordered or to prepare it for move-off, will not be paid for; (3) idle time waiting for the arrival of transporting equipment to move the rented equipment wili nog be paid for, 7. Before any work is commenced on this contract, or pursuant to a purchase order, the Contractor shall furnish to the Public Works Director: (a ) Evidence of adequate Workmens' Compensation Insurance. (b) Certificate of Public Liability (5250,000/5500,000) and Property Damage Insurance ($100,000. ) V -2- Canyon Road Project tio.,,2631-4165-75 GENERAL PRiVISIONS (Continued) 8» By acceptance of the contract or purchase order, the under- signed agrees to save, indemnify, and hold harmless the County `of Contra Costa, or its representatives, from all liabilities imposed by law by reason of injury or of death to any person or persons or damage to property which may arise out of the work covered by this contract, or performed pursuant to the purchase order, and does agree to defend the County in any claim or action asserting such liability. Company Authorized Date Signature Address Title California Contractor's (SIGNATURE TO BE NOTARIZED) License No. 00= -3 r ;1 sf !r 7 i✓;y4vN !1J y y r •. '•'t• � 'W! � � how � A OZr rF r • •. r• •w OY¢¢�WVD o �•+ ' i ' as '•' �=t• r:. ■ i. • ;�ar�• a.•,:•t• r/ tt p Y it1 O lii�" " • ' _�« •Vii' � � + ,►`p.'j+ts.s n.3�! t� .+J• j ` ,•�•1' o y Z V 4 ,'�. �•a �Y'»i � '• • i2L !tj 1 �,��y�j/.�I'T� s r■.`s" � 1•r �Q'• :•L't� •.fi i i �w : 1 .•.t• i S^ �';__ ..,• .". ii i"'� w ` : 5 r•e-+i Kv ' •�° J'L +j?• •(,,Ss'i :' `?•+�_%r • tt 4 , '�:,1♦' S,« 1� �O i S..♦ 't rt ii • ri� � Ls 1 ;i �:.�.+. r•i3 Is I aY •y.is '�' t it , G `�J •.• '1t;y .s •`i p sb +� :ri �•�"i =w i S'A. t Asiw � ••M d ,1 i 1 ,Z•tt i Mme.-' • t W \ •r g..��c• ��' �Z'=S �S `'� •.It� t A �tS `�...- Y�'�a's•.i'• ' y ' � � z 4 f� y'SS.++rrr� •'a ' ■ wo i i~ �' b• t• r . rs 1_ 4 :45 • f•+• s i.�j•t D Sr S'�� •"?i pT '•+: .•' vv* 41 :L•+L 23 •x' _ :'Y br`Cyg < g !r, t°:�:!O� 5 J _ $' 'a� �;pfs.Ci• Y" 1 tom.. si5'.t� Z •" f 3• •iR •wP�'t sad •'t. f.,'ls y�.� W a �!♦•� 'a � y rS Olk Y S !•. � �r y Sa OR S Y �} v.", t 'S,•`+�f' ilf � '` � p is p � < w•�' � ••Z 1 �1 a i x t i«! • w ag • s �y.� Y i •. War { �.t f" iia •�rs'� Y 1 �I S..ys } ';•� O+• •� a• -« t a sit E3i o giw OA r f � i � `� 'KL • 1.jrt•4� N I, Is di i:Si• � ; �� ''�i e: .. ■. ,� int ssy ri.t , s� �t;'S rK■v� �' ;i'rr .� = 0 ;•■:•r" r .1' J ±,, Q. •1 '.L:�� iir1"'v♦•• r 1 • _ •..�, j`•'•.•. +Sit V 4 �,^ :. • Cy F ". o r g t�• : t .r •tb v, •i�ir � R.• •7 OS Is V�' Y ' • •I t • y t r t a cl ._.--�s�-'"'�'�j4, ' •• ` _': `•' ��-.'l.t �: � `;ate... �%`� CAN ON QA a �.'-?�.QG G .-�.•..��.•.. Ar< �:~�;�•' t,`t•' ^-...:': ."``tow``"... • � 1 � a SL� -rh. *7 •�Y i `'j.. it�iJ t�'^'^t Y1 ••ry4'• •`•7 a.`. r-^'�•r./ \ '� Q \ `='Q 9`'a.«�., .'♦ r• • •:� 'i ut Y' t ''� ,.\-'� ✓ �`'�,^-r�•' ��` fir. b `�• \1 �t`i� 4\ y y� r.r v" iv 1 (�'a `c crt� /r•�`:,r x �• •1+ 'p"{J♦t a•. _'r•`' +`� . ✓ s uN = r.:✓ y+'��at / _t""�y"r. �'G�-_yr♦1 r� S� 1 1t � � �.l �• „� •�.r'fir � 1 �^ ".- .�"i i.• .�•_ G 4 i .r•,�4 x s .i IN i! a 1 t t1 1�,,,i, fi •' � r� •,s. 4 ,n I. � � r!✓..�.._ `r,;.h,�:N' ~'•• I is a `�. .. ', N OM -4! ,r � �•• 00.4 s • ,t �': �a✓ ':..i' b � �� - � � O � .• �Of C"! *~ p 's' iJrr� �l� il,' � t;'• Iy \�I �"'r: yml ` J i• *.� " .. lN7C�l[�'i(N"tfd%•; •�• ••\ � •• .•t 1 �Y ( ;4 na SIN Sr 4 > d 11, 1 Q tr► u �, 7p �. f 4 � o zi r - Nuri via ICA, IL TL ,.. K o � �• M ��LR• '� i -" k,_ y r0 .� ` Cypy Cs Z �� In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19 75 In the Matter of Senate Bill 599. The Board on August 25, 1975 having discussed Senate Bill 599 which would remove the local option of including a county jail within a department of corrections and would require that jails be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the sheriff, and having deferred to this date further consideration of same; and Sheriff Harry D. Ramsay having commented on the law enforcement reasons for having the jail under the jurisdiction of the sheriff; and Board members having commented on the desirability of supporting the position established by the County Supervisors Association of California; and On motion of Supervisor J. P. Kenny, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS ORDERED that a County position in OPPOSITION to Senate Bill 599 is hereby established. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c.c. Governor Edmund G. Brown u �,. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of �►rvisors Senator J. A. Nejedly ed this .,� Senator N. C. Petrie affix --,D—day of 19 gg� Assemblyman J. T. Knox J. R. OLSSON, CM Assemblyman D. E. Boatwri*t Deputy Clerk Assemblyman K. A. Meade --PAleen Elder H 24 s/74 CAA Q County of San Diego Sheriff-Coroner County Administrator county Administrator �w'it►�tet;-. In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 _' 19 75 In the Matter of Request of Schell & Martin, Inc. (1912-RZ) to Rezone Land in the West Danville Area. M. C. Connett, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Schell & Martin, Inc. (1912-RZ) to rezone land in the West Danville area, and no one having appeared in opposition; and The Board having certified that the final Environmental Impact Report as received from the Planning Commission has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the state guidelines and having further certified that the Board as lead agency and decision-making body has reviewed, con- sidered and evaluated the information contained in the said final Environmental Impact Report; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Schell & Martin, Inc. (1912-RZ) to rezone 7.2 acres fronting approximately 660 feet on the southerly side of Kuss Road and Clipper Hill Road , being 180 feet westerly of Bradford Place, West Danville area, from Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40) to Single Family Resi- dential District-20 (R-20) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance , amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County, giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in "THE VALLEY PIONEER." PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date oforesaid. c c. Schell & Martin, Inc. Wlitness my hand and the Seal of the Board of M. C. Connett supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Ro bie 6 ierrez H 24 8175 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia September 2 , 19`75 _ In the Matter of Request of Valley View Company Applicant and Owner, to Rezone Land in the Walnut Creek Area (1956-RZ) This beim; the time fixed for hearing on the recom- mendation of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Valley View Company (1956-RZ) to rezone land in the Walnut Creek area, and no one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. Anthony A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised that no Environmental Impact Report was required for this application inasmuch as the General Plan indicates low density single family residential for the area; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Valley View Company to rezone approximately 23 acres, more or less, fronting 1,300 feet, on the southwest side of Castle Rock Road in the Walnut Creek area, from Single Family Residential District (R-12) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and the County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance, amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa -County,: giving effect to the same, said ordinance to- be published for the time and in the manner as required by law in the CONTRA COSTA TIMES. Passed by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Valley View Company Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 2nd day ofSentember . 197 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By ' 'f1"7yt.rL 2 '40Cvz _ Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz l�ll►�t7U(7 H 24 8/75 10M 01.0 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request of Ron Walker Realty, Applicant , (1957-RZ) to Rezone Land in the East Alamo Area. Janet S. Neill, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommenda- tion. of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Ron Walker Realty, applicant (1957-RZ) to rezone land in the East Alamo area, and no one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised the Board that no Environmental Impact Report was required for this application; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Ron Walker Realty (1957-RZ) to rezone 6 acres (more or less) fronting approximately 400 feet on the east side of El Pintado Road, generally opposite Spring Lane, East Alamo area, from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance, amend- ing the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County, giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in "The Valley Pioneer." PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975• 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• Applicant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • Owner Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 2nd day of September . 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H za 12n4 - is-n N. In aham ' t In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Request of Coleman & Isakson, Applicants (1954-RZ) to Rezone Land in the Alamo Area. Ron Johnson, Owner. This being the time fixed for hearing on the recommenda- tion of the Planning Commission with respect to the request of Coleman & Isakson, applicants (1954-RZ) to rezone land in the Alamo area, and no one having appeared in opposition; and Mr. A. A. Dehaesus, Director of Planning, having advised the Board that no Environmental Impact Report was required for this application; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the request of Coleman & Isakson (1954-RZ) to rezone 2.79 acres (more or less) located westerly of the intersection of Hagen Oaks Drive and Hagen Oaks Court, southerly of Stone Valley Road, Alamo area, from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20) is APPROVED as recommended by the Planning Commission. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Director of Planning and County Counsel are DIRECTED to prepare an ordinance, amending the zoning ordinance of Contra Costa County, giving effect to the same, said ordinance to be published for the time and in the manner required by law in "The Valley Pioneer." PASSED by the Baord on September 2, 1975• I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc• Applicants Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Owner Supervisors Director of Planning affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By Deputy Clerk H 24 12!74 - 15-M N. In aham xW70- r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 IL In the Matter of Proposed County Jail. The Board having received an .August 21, 1975 letter from The Honorable Jackson C. Davis, Presiding Judge, Superior Court, expressing the opinion that the proposed county Jail should be constructed at its presently planned location, that the criminal courts and Jail should be in one building adjacent to the present courthouse, that it should contain a combination of single and multiple cells, and that construction of said facility should commence without further delay; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid letter is ACKNOW1EDGED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Judge Jackson C. Davis Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Counsel Supervisors County Sheriff—Coroner affixed this2nd day of a0plMber, 19 -M �//JJ J. R. OLSSON, Clerk �� By_ /C � . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall ilk H 24 8/75 lOM ;rs t JACKSON C. DAVIS1ttut "tea • y4�1oRCOGp� JUDGE [FQ,Qr�Ziji 9 DEPARTMENT 6 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA COURTHOUSE • MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553 August 21, 1975 RECEIVED AUG 2 21975 Board of Supervisors aeaat b,;� 9'-Uw- - Contra Costa County l�''�, °f;UAetNi°°ft Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 r Re: Proposed County Jail Gentlemen: Mr. Will has conferred with a delegation of Superior Court Judges regarding the alternatives submitted with reference to the location of the proposed new jail and the issue of single-versus-multiple cells. Meanwhile, we have been informed that an agreement has been reached with Senator Nejedly whereby a ratio of one-third single cells to two-thirds multiple cells will be acceptable, and that his bill has been withdrawn. Finally, we understand Mr. Will has been requested to report on the propriety and cost impact if the courtrooms are eliminated from the construction. The following is written on the assumption that the existing Superior Courts are to remain in their present location in Martinez. The fail should be constructed at its presently planned location: 1. Criminal courts and jail should be in one building. a. Each day, substantial numbers of inmates must personally attend court for various motions and hearings as well as trial. When, as now, the jail is in a separate building, the prisoners must be transported in manacles on public streets to attend court. This results in (i) risk of danger to the public in event of attempted escape or other disturbance, (ii) a daily event which downgrades Martinez' civic image, (iii) exposure U. orci�c V MicrotQm or-agarftra MINN Board of Supervisors ' Page 2 August 21, 1975 of citizens to vulgarities by the prisoners, - (iv) ongoing expense in providing escorts and transportation, and (v) contentions that criminal defendantsi constitutional rights to a fair trial are prejudiced by such public exposure, or that cruel and inhuman punishment is being inflicted. b. The efficiency of the criminal courts will be promoted when prisoners are available for immediate court appearance, inasmuch as .events frequently occur which require an unanticipated court attendance by an inmate. c. At present, with the criminal and civil courts being located in the same building, jurors, civil litigants and witnesses, and young children, are exposed to shackled prisoners' as they are led through the corridors. Further, there is always the possibility (as occurred several weeks ago) that a criminal defendant will attempt to escape and will run through crowded hallways endangering bystanders. d. New courtrooms will be required, probably even before the completion date of the jail. Projections indicate that by 1977 we will need four more judicial positions than we have at this time. Including such courtrooms in the new build- ing should be less costly than construction at a separate site. 2. Criminal courts and 'ail should be ad'acent to the present court ouse. a. To obtain maximum utilization of the services of each judge, it is necessary that all legal matters be assigned out from the presiding judge to the various departments. As each department completes its assignment, the presiding judge is notified and he sends the next pending matter to such department. Where the departments are in proximity, such transfers are made in a matter of moments. If they were to be placed at widely separated locations, a substantial loss of time occurs while the litigants, lawyers, witnesses, court files and exhibits are trans- ported from one place to another. 00373 Board of Supervisors Page 3 August 21, 1975 b. Expense, delay and confusion would result from distant separation of the courts in. connection with juries and jury panels. At -present, the jury panel is held in the jury panel waiting room, from which certain numbers are sent to the individual trial departments when jury selection commences. As prospective jurors are challenged and removed, and when the. jury is selected, those persons not selected rejoin the rest of the panel in the waiting room for assign- ment out to other trial departments. If the courts were to be widely separated, the county would have to provide some means of transportation. c. If the jail and courts were to be located in the area of the Juvenile Hall, as some have proposed, and if the panel were transported there by the county, the county would have to provide some sort of eating arrangements for the panel. d. If the structure is now to be relocated, not only will further delay and expense result, but protests will be received from residents of any such new area. e. Even with only one branch court--Richmond-- there is almost daily confusion and misunderstanding on the part of witnesses, litigants and attorneys who appear at one location when they should be at the other. f. It is also desirable that each department be located in proximity of the county clerk's office, which is the repository of the legal files and the place where all judicial orders must be filed. Frequently a trial court has unanticipated and immediate need of a file. Delay and expense will result if a bailiff must travel some distance to obtain same. g. Operation of the Richmond court is inef- ficient for the reasons mentioned herein. If the two planned courtrooms are also removed from proximity of the courthouse, this waste will be compounded, to the extent that we would require an additional judge to offset the loss. 0OV4 x.4. r Board of Supervisors : Page 4 August 21, 1975 The Jail should contain a combination of single and multip a ce s; 1. Some prisoners express a preference for multiple cells. Motivation in some instances is sex oriented, which of course is not an acceptable reason. However, some prisoners are gregarious by nature, and some may experience genuine discomfort if locked up in .isolation. 2. Single cells maximize opportunities for suicide. 3. Defense lawyers may be relied upon to contend confinement in a single cell constitutes "solitary confine- ment" and an abridgment of constitutional rights. if an alternative is provided, such contention is eliminated. 4. Senator Nejedly cited court decisions which he interpreted as suggesting a legal mandate that all cells be single. Those of us who have read those decisions do not interpret same to contain such an unqualified mandate; rather, the courts therein were confronted with evidence of specific jails which contained a multitude of deplorable conditions wherein one such was the multiple use of cells originally designed for single occupancy. However, it must be conceded that no one can anticipate what the State or United States Supreme Courts will do at any time. We can merely advise that in our opinion, at least, a combination plan is not only acceptable, but preferable to a design which would provide only single cells. 5. We understand "Plan A" achieves a combination which would comply with your agreement with Senator Nejedly. For that reason and for the reasons set forth above, we recommend such Plan. You have been under pressure from groups who do not want to spend money for a jail, or who advocate parole alternatives in lieu of confinement, or who want a jail so long as it is placed somewhere else. However, it cannot be questioned that the use of the old jail must be discontinued 003'75 i Board of Supervisors Page 5 August 212 1975 and each day's delay is costing the taxpayers money. We- are confident that it is in the best interest of the great, majority of the citizens of this county that the studies and hearings and referrals be brought to an end, that a final decision be made, and that construction commence without further delay. Very truly yours, JACKSON C. DAVISr Presiding Judge Superior Court JCD:ea cc: All Supervisors Superior Court Judges County Administrator Arthur Will • nn � V � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 75 In the Matter of Acknowledging receipt of report of the Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals D-Lr. A. L. Seeley, Agricultural Commissioner, having received a copy of a report of the activities of the Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for the fiscal year, 1974-75; and Mr. Seeley having expressed his appreciation for>a job well done and for the complete and splendid cooperation extended his department by the Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforementioned report is acknowledged with appreciation. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Orig: County Department of Supervisors Agriculture affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By . %/r L,' . �„ U.. / Deputy Clerk H 24 12174 . JSM Aobbie utier4z cc: Contra Costa S.P.C.A. County Administrator 003'77Y :_� THE CONTRA COSTA SOCIETY (cr the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS 1622 Santa Clara Street Richmond, California Phone: 525-0566 August 19, 1975 AN:1,SAL REPORT D luI L4 . D . To, Board of Suoervi sons AUG 2 0 1975 Via: Agricultural Commissioner Fiscal Year: „uiy 1, 1974 - June 30, 1975 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE GRL U E U U A < En En En C H C��' ; x a v) G: In am , sw2 -�.." w w w o z � Q •..7' 0 . C �' rar o Or vx v x v x a. �-• wo July *74 66 ZOS l96 61 1,188 599 .755 875 August 52 90 205 55 1,077 579 723 859 .Seat=ber 29 72 179 37 1,460 493 643 758 oc`ober G•7 94 177 49 1,298 536 658 835 h1w.-c-iber 41 68 175 36 1,231 490 605 697 December 83 116 176 73 1,373 588 662 745 January 975 62 102 168 52 880 497k 651 742 February 62 112 160 55 1,254 50914- 763 tiarch 66 120 169 55 356 524 695 799 Aaril 50 86 153 39 836 360 481 655 ;day 65 104 193 56 916 661 759 902 Jure 57 79 157 50 882 476 616 654 TOTAL 700 1,147 2,108 618 13,251k62312 7,841 9,284 Resaectfully submitted, / George Bradford, Jr. PRESIDENT 003'78 h'ticrofikned with board order In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 , In the Matter of Request for Investigation of Operations of Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. The Board earlier this day aaltnowledged receipt of a report on the activities of the Contra Costa: Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for the fiscal year 1974-1975• In connection therewith Nr. Warren L. Smith, 1100' Bailey Road, Pittsburg, California 94565 appeared and requested that the Board examine the operations or the S.P.C.A. inaamuch as he telt that the society investigated complaints< which- were not necessarily valid and that the organization encouraged citizens to file such complaints. The Board took no action on this request. THIS IS A NATTER OF RECORD a matter of record' hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy ofamsnibr, inbred on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dab aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Supervison affixed this 2nd day of Ssptsmber. 19 75 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By. Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boas (0379 H 24 8/75 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California r f Sentember 2 19 Z.� . In the Matter of Noise Element of the County General Plan The Director of Planning having notified this Board that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the above amendment; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that a hearing be held on Tuesday, September 16, 1975 at 11:50 a.m. in Room 107, Administration,,- Building, dministration -Building, Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, and that the Clerk publish notice of same as required by law in the CONTRA COSTA TIMES. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote oforesaid Witless my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Planning Supervisors Public Works affixed this nrt day of�Sont fnrhor,. 19 _ J. EL OL.SSON,, Clerk By Deputy Clerk: Bonnie Boaz H 24 5/74 -12,500 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 ' 19 11 In the Matter of Claim for Damomes Mr. Dennis Rua•a• Harnetto, 1092 Kitahell Caron Real, Clayton, California, 9451T, havi" filed with this Hoard on August T. 19T5 a olaim for daaaa•s In the s wwat of $210012.421 IT I3 BY TRT BOARD ORDSASD that the aforesaid akin Is DMIND. PA3M by the Board on SepUmber 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Go: Claisant Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works (3) Supervisors Attn t Mr. broatchaffixed this 2nd �y of September 19 T5 County Counsel — County Administrator J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By d-M�� 4Yt' . Deputy Clerk Bon=* Boaz 8 H 24 8/75 10M m WNW ti I L =W= 1, X411=2 7 1975 _ J. R. OLSON 1 ;"lalm of CLW EOA;D OF sux.rS= ' C^ TRA COST COQ. 21'' DENNIS EUGENE BARNETTE . CLAIM FAR DAMAGES FOR 3 � v. BATTERY AND NEGLIGENCE UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE 4 CITY OF CONCORD; and THE SECTION 910 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA; 5 OFFICER BREUKER of the CONCORD POLICE DEPARTMENT; 6 � DOES ONE through TEN, INCLUSIVE; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 7 OF THE CITY OF CONCORD. 8 0: THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF CONCORD, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 9 10 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that DENNIS EUGENE BARNETTE, hereby 11 claims damages from OFFICER BREUKER, CITY OF CONCORD, COUNTY OF CO 12 if OSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and DOES ONE THROUGH TEN, INCLUSIVE, 13 :.UBLIC EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF CONCORD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, in the 1 14iiamounts, computed as of the date of the presentation of this claim 15 hereinafter set forth. 16 The claims herein are based on physical injuries inflicted on 17 claimant and the lost income claimant suffered due to being unable 18 to work due to the battery and negligence of OFFICER BREUXER, CITY 0 19 ONCORD and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA arising frau the following 20 dates, places and circumstances: 21 (1) On May 1, 1975, claimant, DENNIS EUGENE BARNETTE was 22 arrested for suspicion of violation of vehicle code 23102(a) He was 23 !a rested by OFFICER BREUKER of the Concord Police Department and a 24 as yet unidentified fellow police officer of the Conoord Police 25 II epartment. 26i (2) At approximately 0159 hrs. on May 1, 1975, claimant was la t . t 1jTrested, and placed in handcuffs for transportation to the jail. 2 + (3) At said time and place, OFFICER BREUKER and his fellow 3 Dfficer, placed handcuffs on claimant which were so tight and re- 4 trictive, that he suffered nerve damage to his hands, wrist and 5 orearm. 6 (4) At said time and place, said claimant, 'DENVIS EUGENE 7 BARNETTE, repeatedly asked the officers to loosen the handcuffs, to 8 hich they negectively responded. 9 (5) OFFICER BREUKER, and his fellow officer, were negligent 10 'n that they failed to use reasonable care in applying the handcuffs 11 to claimant, which resulted in a severe restriction of hands, wrist 12 d arms,which thereby caused a nerve damage and injury thereto. 13 (6) In so applying the handcuffs in the manner iu which severe 14 erve damage was inflicted to claimant, defendants were using unrea- 15 sonable force, and in so doing, committed a battery. 16 (7) Claimant, . at this time, is unable to name the other 17 "ellow officer and parties responsible for the injuries inflicted 18 apon him and ask leave to amend this claim to set forth the names, 19 ac ties, badge numbers, and titles of DOES ONE through TEN, Inclu 20 sive when the same have been ascertained. 21 (8) Claimant, claims the following damages as of the date of 22 f the presentation of this claim: 23AAgainst Officer Breuker and the City of Concord, nd the County of Contra Costa Inclusive for 24 eneral damages, physical and mental pain, and uffering, etc. 25 Medical Bills $345.62 Lost Income-2 wks $696.80 261 General damages $10000.00 carried forward $11042.42 AN . V mil i R -2- - 00383 I I ; carried forward $11042.42 2 'against Officer Breuker, Does One through Ten, Inclusive, for exemplary damages for 3lintentional battery $10000.00 4 TOTAL DAMAGES $21042.42 5 (9) All notice or other communication with regards to this 6 claim should be sent to DENNIS EUGENE BABNETTE, 1092 Mitchell Canyom 7 Road, Clayton, California, 685-0386. 8 � 9 DATED: August 5, 1975 10 Claimant In Propria Persona 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3- 00384 F In the. Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Reptpmber ? In the Matter of Application for leave to . present late claim Mr. Jimmie Lee Haley, 2707 Mayfair Avenue, Concord, California 94520, having filed with this Board on August 12, 1975 an application for leave to present late claim in the amount of $100,000.00; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid appli cation is DENIED. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid Witness my hand and the Sealof the Board of cc: Claimant supervisors Public Works (3) affixed this 2nd day of September. 19 75 Attn: Mr. Broat ch J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Counsel B Q , . D Clerk County Administrator y eP'+tY Bonnie Boaz 00385 H 24 8175 10M H 24 9175 10M JI2%T,'4IE LEE HALEY, ] Claimant, ] APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO J PRESENT LATE CLAIM BY VS. ) CLAIMANT l CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, ] MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL ] DISTRICT ] TO THE CONTROLLER OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: 1. Application is hereby made for leave .to present a late claim founded on a cause of action for personal injuries* which accrued in December, 1972, and for which a claim was not presented within the 100 day period provided by Section 911.2 of the Government Code. For additional circumstances relating to the T' cause of action, reference is made to the proposed claim attached to this application. 2. The reason that no claim was presented during the period of time provided by Section 911.2 of the Government Code is that the claimant, JIM_MIE LEE HALEY, was a minor during all of the 100 day period specified by Section 911.2 for presentation of the claim, -all as more particularly shown by the attached declaration of JIMMIE LEE HALEY. 3. This application is being presented within a reason- able time after the accrual of this cause of action, as more parti- cularly shown by the attached declaration of JIM141E LEE HALEY. Fif L l�uG /d, 1g75 J. R Q4V CJAf ^CCSlA e APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM BY CLAIMANT Page two - WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this, application be granted and that the attached proposed claim be ,; rec-eived and acted on in accordance_with Sections 912.4' = 912.8` of the Government Code. DATED: August 11, 1975 Law Offices of NE D. REID,, C� By Pamela Pierson a. 0038 DECLARATION OF JIMMIE LEE HALEY IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM I, JIMMIE LEE HALEY, hereby declare under penatly of perjury that the following is true and correct. That in the first part of December, 1972, while I was playing football on the grounds of Mt. Diablo High School, in Concord, County of Contra Costa, State of California, I suffered injuries to my leg and knee as a result of the negligent supervision of the grounds of the school by the school authorities. That at the time I suffered said injuries I was - participating in required school activities; That I was fifteen (15) years of age at the time that I suffered the said injuries and that I became eighteen (18) years of age on July 6, 1975. That I have suffered permanent injuries and I wish to file a claim against the County of Contra Costa, Mt. Diablo Unified School District in the amount of $100,000.00. That it is less than 100 days since I attained the age of majority. DATED: August 8, 1975 San Francisco, California 00t1lJC7 CLAIM AGAINST THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA MT. DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Government Code Sections 910 to 911.2 require that all claims must be presented to the Board of Supervisors within 100 days from date of accident. CLAIMANT' S NAME: JIMMIE LEE HALEY AMOUNT OF CLAI14: $100,000.00 CLAIMANT'S ADDRESS: 2707 Mayfair Avenue Concord, California 94520 ADDRESS TO WHICH NOTICES ARE TO BE SENT: c/o Law Offices of NEIL D. REID, INC. 228 McAllister Street San Francisco, California 94102 DATE OF ACCIDENT: December 1972 LOCATION OF ACCIDENT: Mt. Diablo High School, Concord, California HOWT DID ACCIDENT OCCUR: In the first part of December 1972, I was participating in required school activities when I suffered personal injuries while plahing football due to negligent supervision of the grounds of the school by the school authorities. DESCRIBE DAMAGES: Injured leg, knee and hip Signed on behalf of claimant JIMMIE LEE HALEY DATED: August 11, 1975 Law Offices of NEIL D. REID, INC. By P Pamela E. Pierson c � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 1975 In the Matter of Legal Defense IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County provide legal defense, as follows , reserving all of the rights of the County in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Sections- 825 and 995: NAME AND/OR DEPARTMENT COURT AND ACTION NUMBER Mr. T. L. Lambert, Deputy Sheriff Superior Court No. 155517 Myrtle Brooks , Plaintiff Mr. J. R. Wallis , Deputy Sheriff Superior Court No. 152927 Roy James, Plaintiff Personnel and former personnel Superior Court No. 151656 of the Office of the County Terry Dean Dickson, Plaintiff Sheriff-Coroner PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Sheriff-Coroner Supervisors County Medical Services offixed this 2nd day of September 19 75 County Counsel J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By cx Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz 0M N 24 Bps 10M IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Presentation ) of Position of I.A.F.F. September 2, 1975 Local 1230 Concerning ; Compensation Negotiations. This being the time for representatives of.the United Professional Fire Fighters of Contra Costa County, International Association of Fire Fighters Local 1230, to state the position of said organization concerning compensation negotiations for the 1975-1976 fiscal year; and Mr. William Cullen, Secretary, I.A.F.F. Local 1230, having appeared in support of the organization's request for increased pay, expanded fringe benefits, and additional personnel; and Mr. Cullen having advised that the last offer submitted- by the county representative (Industrial Employers and Distributors Association) was unacceptable, having asserted that an impasse in negotiations exists, and on said basis having requested that the Board make final determination on the fire fighters' demands or submit same to arbitration; and Mr. Benton Wright, President, I.A.F.F. Local 1230, having informed the Board that in the event the organization's final proposal is not accepted or the matter is not submitted to arbitration, the fire fighters in the five districts (Contra Costa County, E1 Sobrante, Orinda, Moraga and Riverview) will take a job action but that he was hopeful of a negotiated solution; and Chairman W. N. Boggess having stated that the Board does not directly engage in meet and confer negotiations, that said negotiations are conducted by I.E.D.A. on behalf of the Board, and having further stated that the County's Employer-Employee Relations Ordinance provides for mediation as the initial means for resolu- tion of an impasse, followed by fact finding, if necessary; and On the recommendation of Supervisor A. M. Dias, ITIS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the county's representative (I.E.D.A.) is instructed to contact Local 1230 representatives to arrange another meeting in an attempt to arrive at a satisfactory agreement. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 2, 1975. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK cc: I.E.D.A. By �� aL�� I.A.F.F. Local 1230 Deputy Clerk Director of Personnel County Counsel County Administrator 003% 0._ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 --j19 75 In the Matter of Prepaid Health Plan Contract with the State of Cal itornia. Mr. C. A. Hammond, on behalf of the County Administrator, having advised that the Prepaid Health Plan contract with the State of California will expire in the relatively near future and having, therefore, suggested that a committee of the Board be designated to meet with the County Administrator and the Director, Human Resources Agency, to review policy issues to be resolved; and The Board members being in agreement with said suggestion, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORD-".r = that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty). PASSED by the Board on September 21, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witnen my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Board Committee County Administrator S'pen`aOn Director, Human affixed this 2nd _doy ofSep±ember,, 19 7-5— Resources Agency ` , J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By A&WG IR4UL4& Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall (D) 00M H 24 8/75 IOW t _ . In the Board of Supervisors Of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 In the Matter of Proposed Budget for Delta Advisory Planning Council. The Board having received an August 25, 1975 memorandum from Mr. Richard Hildebrand, Chairman, Delta Advisory Ming Council, Sacramento, enclosing the Council's proposed budget for the 1975-1976 fiscal year and requesting Board approval of same; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is REFERRED to the County Administrator. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: County Administrator 1Mdness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Public Works Director Supervaors Environmental Control affixed tho -2 _day ofSeptembgr 19 M Director of Planning J. R�.�iOLSSON, Clerk By. / IIZZ ZgA- . Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00393 H 24 8/75 10M „4 u t � In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Seytember 2" 19 tri— In the Matter of Complaint Regarding ' Planning Matters. The Board having received a letter from Mr. Fabin Richart, Route 1, Box 88, Byron California 94514, complaining that planning matters are being delayed pending receipt oE..,the recommendations of the committee established by the Board to aid in review of the County General Plan as it applies to the eastern portion of the county; IT IS ORDERED that the concerns expressed by Mr. Richart are referred to the Director of Planning for report. Passed by the Board on September 2R. 19T5- 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors an the date aforesaid c c - Mr. F. F. Richart Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Director of Planning Supervisors County Administratoraffixed this 2nd 'day of September . 19T5 J. R. OLSSON, Clerk By i L[-21 t/ti Deputy Clerk Bonnie Boaz W394 H 24 aflS 10M I H 24 8/75 10M In the Board of Supe rs rviso of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 7r In the Matter of Start-up Funds in connection with Child Health and Disa- bility Prevention Program. The Board having received a letter from Edward P. Melia, M.D. , Chief, Children and Youth Unit, Family Health Services Section, State Department of Health, advising that an optional reimbursement procedure of the Child Health and Disability Prevention Program provides start-up funds for salaries of health screening personnel for a four-month period in fiscal year 1975- 1976, and that a budget addendum must be submitted by September 15, 1975 in order to utilise said procedure; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid matter is REFERRED to the Director, Human Resources Agency. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: Director, Human Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Resources Agency Supervisor Acting County Health affixed this a,d day ofSoptag ,, 19 ,7 Officer J. R. OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator By �✓� �2c,r�„��,/ , Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall 00395.. H 24 8/75 10M r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 , 19 7, In the Matter of Proposed Property Exchange. Supervisor E. A. hinseheid having brought to the attention of the .Board a letter he received from Mr. John W. Ewing, Manager, Commercial Investment Division, John M. Grubb Company, Realtors,- Walnut Creek, proposing that the county consider exchanging property for a parcel of land on South Main Street in Walnut Creek which the company feels could be developed as a recreational property; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid proposal is REFERRED to the Public Works Director, Real Property Division. PASSED BY THE BOARD ON September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the. minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid M cc: Mr. J. W. 1 ring arms my hand and the Seal of the Board of 1301 Ygnacio Valley Rd. Supervisors Walnut Creek, Calif. affixed rthis 2nd day of September. 19 � Public Works Director J. R. OLSSON, Ctwrk Real Property Division By Deputy Clerk, County Administrator Helen C. Marshal f H 24 BP5 10M I z 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September. 2 , 19'-75 In the Matter of Freeway Locations on Routes 93 and 77, Orinda—Lafayette Area. The Board having received an August 22, 1975 letter from Fir. T. R. Lammers, District Director, State Department of Trans— portation, transmitting a copy of a resolution adopted by--the California Highway Commission rescinding the previously adopted freeway locations on Routes 93 and 77 between Orinda .and Lafayette (Contra Costa County), and advising that disposal of acquired rights of way is being deferred until July 1, '1976 to allow planning and financial studies for local transportation needs to be completed; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid resolution is RIMMED to the Public corks Director. PASSED by the Board on August 25, 1975. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the dote aforesaid. cc: Public Works Director Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of. Director of Planning Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 7nd day of 19 —75 J. R. OtSSON, Clerk By ijZ Ce- h` Deputy Clerk Helen C. l:"arshall 011397 H 24 6/75 10M 4 � H�0 5 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19U— In 9U-In the Matter of Petitions in connection with proposed Assessment District No. 1975-5, Alamo Area. The Board having received petitions from Alamo residents expressing opposition to proposed Assessment District No. 1975-5,r Entrada Verde Improvements, and requesting that certain properties be excluded from said assessment district; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid petitions are REFEALRED to the Public Works Director. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid cc: First Named Petitioner, Wiener my hand and the Seal of the Board of Mr. Ted Rusley Supervisors Public Works Director affixed this 2,a day of spptembi,,. 19 M- County Counsel J. R OLSSON, Clerk County Administrator Deputy Clerk Helen C. Marshall t17C7 H 24 8PS 10M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Califomia SeRlember 2 19 7-1- In the Matter of Request for additional Security Measures at Buchanan Field Airport, Concord. Supervisor V. H. Boggess having brought to the attention of the Board an .August 25, 1975 Letter he received from Mr. Joe Kramas, President, Bodekey Electronics Inc. , Concord, requesting that additional security measures be provided at Buchanan Field Airport to deter thefts of airplane and/or radio and aviation equipment, and that additional investigative and recovery methods for stolen property be employed. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid request is AES'.-RRE:'D to the Contra Costa County Aviation Liaison Committee. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered an the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. Joe Kramas 'Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 109O E Detroit Ave. Supervisors Concord, Calif. 94520 affixed tha 2nd_day of Sspt=2b=, 19 M Aviation Liaison Cte. e I R. OLSSON, Clerk Public works Director By. �'1� ,, ,,,,� C tlZ Deputy Clerk County Sheriff-Coroner • Helen C. MarshallCounty Administrator Airport Manager H 24 SPS 10M H 24 6/75 10M IN THE BOARD OF :SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Proposal ) that Transfer of Cardroom ) September 2, 1975 Licenses be Permitted. ) This being the time for the Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) to present its recommenda- tions with respect to the request of Attorney T. J. Coll that consideration be given to amending the County Ordinance Code to allow cardroom licenses to be transferred; and Supervisor Dias having reported that the Committee had reviewed the code provisions governing cardroom licenses, that Section 52-2.411 does not permit cardroom licenses to be assigned or transferred, that said section was enacted to effect the gradual elim- ination of all cardroom licenses, that an increase in the number of licenses would not result from removal of the restriction but that the present number would be retained; and Supervisor Dias having further reported that the Committee had also reviewed this matter with the County Sheriff-Coroner and the County Counsel and after considering all facets of the situation is of the opinion that removal of the restriction on the transfer of cardroom licenses is warranted with the understanding that transfers be subject to a transfer fee and to consideration by the Board on an individual basis on the recommendation of the County Sheriff, to assure that no one person (or firm) accedes to the several licenses and that cardroom operations do not concentrate in any single geogra- phical area of the county; and The Committee having recommended that the Board direct the office of the County Counsel to prepare appropriate amendments to the Ordinance Code to accomplish the objectives cited, and Supervisor Dias having moved approval of the Committee recommendation, which motion was seconded by Supervisor Moriarty; and Supervisor Moriarty having suggested that Mr. Coll submit his recommendations as to "fee schedule" to the County Counsel for review in preparing the proposed ordinance amendment; and County Counsel having inquired as to whether transferabil- ity of a license included transfer to a different site as well as individuals and Committee members having responded in the affirmative; and Supervisor J. P. Kenny having raised certain questions and having requested that the County Counsel and the County Sheriff pro- vide him with additional information prior to Board action on the Committee recommendations, and there being no objection the aforesaid motion was withdrawn; and Supervisors E. A. Linscheid and W. N. Boggess having voiced concern with the Committee recommendations, expressing the opinion that a special value would be placed on existing cardroom licenses if transfers were to be allowed; and Board members having further discussed the matter and hav- ing agreed that additional information was desirable; 004tmm- NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of the aforesaid Committee report is ACKNOWLEDGEDand action thereon• is DEFERRED until September 10, 19T5 so that answers to the various, ques- tions raised by Board members might be obtained. PASSED BY THE Board on September 2, 19T5• cc: Attorney T. J. Coll County Counsel County Sheriff-Coroner County Treasurer-Tax Collector Board members CERTIFIED COPY I c m"F that this fs a full, true & correct copy of the orlghW document which is on file in my office, and that it was passed & adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa county. California, on the date Shown.ATTEST: J.` R. OLSSON, County by.Deputy Clerk Clerk&ex•offtcto Clerk of said Board of Supervisors, ,. + �� lot on VV401,- x 00401 • THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JAMES P. KENNY,RICHMOND WARREN M 89GGESS' 11!DISTRIZ" A CHAIRMAN 11111 ALFRED M.DIAS.SEN PASLO CON COSTA COUNTY JAM FS P. KENNY 2h0 0l5TRIGT VI:C CHAIRMAN JAMES E. MORIARTY.LAFAYETTE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. ROOM 103 JAMES R.OLSSON.COu NTY CLERIC "D DISTRICT AND EX OFFICIO CL[ItK OF THE BOARD WARREN N.SOGGFSS.CONCORD P.O. BOX 911 MRS.GERALDINE RUSSELL ATH DISTRICT CMItF CL[RK MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 �� EDMUND A. LINSCHEID. PITTSOUR6 E STH DISTRICT E E 10. � t August 28, 1975 LP a 1975 REPORT J. It. OLSSON Off+ a K D OF SUP W;t5 GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE e 1�; r o. .-..�..Deou ON PROPOSAL TO ALLOW TRANSFER OF CARDROOM LICENSES On February 18, 1975 the Board referred to the Government Operations Committee for review a request that the Board policy be modified to allow for transfer of cardroom licenses. The Committee has reviewed this and determined that Ordinance Code Section 52-2.414 presently governs this matter and that said section provides as follows: "cardroom - Nontransferability of License and Work Permit. No cardroom license and no cardroom work permit shall be assignable or transferable." This provision was enacted to effect gradual elimination of cardroom licenses; its removal would not increase the number of licenses but would retain the present number_ In its review the Committee determined that the Board's action in adopting the aforesaid Ordinance provision was based to a con- siderable degree on a concern at that time that the existence of cardrooms in the unincorporated areas presented a police problem for the County Sheriff. The County Sheriff, therefore, was con- tacted on this matter, and in response the Committee advised by Mr. H. D. Ramsay that cardrooms are not presently a police problem and that he is agreeable to a modification of the aforesaid section to allow for transfer of cardroom licenses. In its review the Committee also determined that County Counsel is concerned that removal of the restriction on trans- ferability may place (or increase) the value of cardroom licenses and that transferability, if authorized, should involve controls on prospective transfers of the cardroom licenses. 00462 Ntiuofiimed with board order 2. Considering all facets of the situation, it is the opinion of the Committee that amendment to the section cited above to remove the restriction on transfer of cardroom licenses is warranted with the understanding that transfers be subject to a transfer fee and to consideration by the Board on an individual basis on the recom- mendation of the County Sheriff-Coroner. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the Office of County Counsel be instructed to pre- pare amendments to the Ordinance Code to accomplish the objectives cited. Board of Supervisors review of proposed cardroom license transfers is suggested to assure that no one person (or firm)' accedes to the several licenses, and that cardroom operations do not concentrate in any single geographic area of the County. Ir A. M. �J. E. MORIARTY isor, District II Supervisor, District III 00403 In the Board of Supervisors of In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California September 2 19 75 In the Matter of Appeal of R. D. and M. V. Earl from Planning Commission Conditional Approval of Tentative Map for Subdivision 4715, Reliez Valley Area. Raymond O'Neal, Owner. The Board having heretofore fixed this date for decision on the appeal of Richard D. and Marilyn V. Earl from Planning Commission approval with conditions of the tentative map for Sub- division 4715, Reliez Valley area; and Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having advised that he had viewed the site, that he was concerned with respect to'the proposed entrance for the subdivision, and having asked if the Public Work's Department staff had considered the possibility of making a through intersection opposite an established subdivision; and Mr. V. L. Cline, Chief Deputy Public Works Director, having stated that construction of a through intersection would necessitate the removal of an existing house; and Mr. Raymond O'Neal, subdivider, having responded that requiring removal of the aforesaid house would undoubtedly terminate plans for the proposed subdivision; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that he also had concerns but that in view of the recommendations of staff and the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission, he would recommend that the appeal of Mr. and Mrs. Earl be denied; IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda- tion is approved. PASSED by the Board on September 2, 1975 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Mr. and Mrs. R. D. Earl Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of � �� Mr. Raymond O'Neal affixed this 2nd d of September, 19 75 Public Works Director ay Director of PlanningJ. R. OLSSON, Clerk By 4L�� , Deputy Clerk H sa 12174 . Esau Vera Nelson 00404 57IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of } Executive Session ) September 2, 1975 } The Chairman having announced at 9:40 a.m. that the Board would recess into executive session to consult with its representa- tives in connection with discussions of salary matters (pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6) and to obtain legal counsel .on mat- ters involving potential litigation in accordance with the Board's order of August 25, 1975; and In connection therewith Mrs. Kathleen Nimr, representing the League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley, having requested per- mission to speak and having read a statement alleging that litigation is nqt legal grounds for referring the referendum petition to executive session and that the only question before the Board is whether the resolution ordering the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization is subject to referendum; and Mrs. Nimr having asked that the August 25, 1975 motion be reconsidered; and County Counsel having responded that there is an attorney- client privilege between County Counsel and the Board of Supervisors and that the Board is entitled to receive confidential legal advice regarding legal action they may take or which is likely to be taken against them; and THEREUPON, the Board recessed into executive session in Room 108 of the County Administration Building. At 11:00 a.m. the Board reconvened in its chambers and the Chairman announced that the decision on the referendum petition re- garding the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization would be made by the Board on September 10, 1975 at 11:15 a.m. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order adopted by the Board of Supervisors on September 2, 1977. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 2nd day of September, 1975. J. R. OLSSON, CLERK cc : County Counsel By ' &T7t� t Gln,. County Administrator Deputy ClerW 0Q405 And the Board adjourns to meet on S at in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California. 4 W. N: Bogges , Chairman ATTEST: J. R. OLSSON, CURB De ut 00 V•K, T� n ; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGULAR PYMING TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2, 1975 Approved minutes of proceedings for month of August. Approved personnel actions for Department of Agriculture (Animal Control Division), District Attorney, Public Works (Buildings and Grounds), Human Resources Agency, Medical Services, Sheriff, Civil Service. ' Authorized placement of dependent child of court at Chamberlain's Children Center. Adopted Ordinance No. 75-37 rezoning certain land in the Danville area to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20), C. and S. Wailes, applicants (1933-RZ). Fixed September 16 at 11:50 a.m. for hearing on recommendation of Planning Commission with respect to Noise Element of the County General Plan. Denied claim for damages filed by D. Barnette; and application for leave to present late claim riled by J. Haley. Authorized provision of legal defense for following personnel in Superior Court Action Nos. indicated: ,Deputy Sheriff Lambert, No. 155517; Deputy Sheriff Wallis, No. 152927; and personnel and former personnel in-Sheriff Is office, No. 151656• Fixed September 10 for adoption of proposed ordinance which would repeal bicycle licensing ordinance (No. 72-23)• Approved Traffic Resolution Nos. 2146 and 2147; and rescinded No. 1329• 00407 September 2, 1975 Summary, continued Page 2 Authorized Director, Human F.esources Agency, to sign fee-for-service contracts with physicians utilized by Medical Services and Health Department; and authorized continuance through September 30, 1.075 of fee-for-service contracts in effect on June 30, 1975. - Authorized attendance of H. Gann and M. Poe, Office of Economic Opportunity, at National Head Start Handicap Conference, Houston, Texas, September 21-24. Exercised option to extend leases with 011, Chemical and Atomic Workers international Union, Local 1-5, for premises at 1515 Market Avenue, San Pablo, for continued use by Medical Services; and with Neighborhood House Inc. for premises at 305 Chesley Avenue, Richmond, for use by Health Department. Established County position in opposition to SB 599 which would renove the local option of including a county jail within a department of corrections and would require that jails be under the exclusive jurisdiction of the sheriff. Approved recommendation of Planning Commission on request of Schell & Martin, Inc. (1912-RZ) to rezone land in the Danville area to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20). Approved recommendation of Planning Commission on request of Valley View Company (1956-RZ) to rezone land in the Walnut Creek area to Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40). Authorized refund of park dedication fee to F. England paid in connection with Issuance of Building Permit No. 83604. Authorized write-off of delinquent general accounts receivable. Approved recommendation of Planning Commission on request of Ron Walker Realty (1957-RZ) to rezone land in the East Alamo area to Single Family Residential District-40 (R-40). Approved recommendation of Planning Commission on request of Coleman & Isakson (1954-RZ) to rezone land in the Alamo area to Single Family Residential District-20 (R-20). Denied appeal of R. Earl from Planning Commission conditional approval of the tentative map for Subdivision 4715, Reliez Valley area. Acknowledged receipt of the following: Letter from Superior Court Presiding Judge J. Davis expressing an opinion with respect to the proposed county jail; Report from the Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals on -its activities for P'Y 1974-75; A?emorandum reports from County-Administrator in connection with dispersal of park dedication funds; and on interim assistance being provided to Vietnamese refugees under existing aid programs. Took the following actions as Ex Officio the Board of Supervisors of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District: Awarded contract to Valley Crest Landscape, Inc., for landscaping on San Ramon and Green Valley Creeks, Danville area; Authorized Public Works Director to arrange for certain channel work on portion of San Ramon Creek, Danville area; and to remove silt, Wildcat Creek, North Richmond area. Granted permission to Contra Costa County Heart Association to close portions of Railroad Avenue, Danville area, on September 6 to hold fund-raising benefit "Pioneer Day," subject to compliance with certain conditions. Accepted instrument for recording only from Garden Creek Development Company, Inc. , In connection with Subdivision 4295. 0000 September 2, 1975 Summary, continued Page 3 Authorized Chairmian to execute the following: Cor.munity bctior. Program Aiulti-Year Plan for 1976, Office of Economic Oppor- tunity; Agreement with Contra Costa County Development Assn. for services in promoting economic development and bicentennial activities in the county; Rental agreement with Duffel Financial & Construction Company and Buchanan Oaks Partners for premises at 2401 Stanwell Drive, Concord, for occupancy by Social Service Department; Contract frith Contra Costa 'County Superintendent of Schools for provision of Comprehensive Alcohol Education and Training Program under the Short-Doyle Act; Agreement with City of Richmond whereby the Probation Department will be paid 5600 to administer a summer program for disadvantaged youth; Grant application to U. S. Department of Justice, LEAA, for purpose of studying county emergency communications system; Amendment- to agreement with Byron Sanitary District whereby the County agrees to pay a service fee for treatment facilities; Amendment to June 24, 1974 contract with State Employment Development Depart- ment extending services for Work Incentive-Career Opportunity Development Program to Nov. 30, 1975; Supplement to Amended License Agreement for IBM Program Products with IBM Cor- poration for purpose of improving teleprocessing systems capability. Instructed County's representative (I.E.D.A.) to contact International Associ- ation of Fire Fighters Local 1230 representatives to arrange a further meeting concerning compensation negotiations. Referred to: Government Operations Committee (Supervisors Dias and Moriarty) - matter of State Prepaid Health Plan contract; County Administrator - request for approval of Delta Advisory Planning Council's proposed budget. for FY 1975-76; Director of Planning - letter from F. Richart re delay of planning matters pending receipt of recommendations of committee established to aid in review of County General Plan relative to eastern portion of county; Director, Human Resources Agency - letter from State Department of Health advising budget addendum be submitted by Sept. 15, 1975 in order to utilize optional reimbursement procedure of the Child Health and Disability Prevention Program rela- tive to start-up funds for salaries of health screening personnel; Public Yorks Director - letter from John gi. Grubb Company proposing that county consider exchanging property for a parcel of land on South Bain Street in Walnut Creek which the company feels could be developed as a recreational property; California Highway Comrission resolution in connection with freeway locations on Routes 93 and 77, Orinaa-Lafayette area; petitions received from Alamo residents re- questing exclusion from proposed Assessment District No. 1975-5; Coitnzy Aviation Liaison Committee - for review and report request of Kodekey Electronics Inc. for additional security measures at Buchanan Field. Authorized payment to L. Davidson et ux in connection with property acquisition, Alcosta Boulevard, San Ramon area, Assessment District 1973-3• Authorized Public : orks Director to arrange for removal of vegetation and debris from various ditches throughout the county; and to install a drop inlet in an exist- ing storm drain system, Martinez area. Declared following ne:mbered ordinances duly published: 75-29 through 75-36. Concurred tirith and ack.norrledged receipt of report from Public Works Department with respect to the reed for completion of Tareyton Avenue, Davona Drive and Broad- moor Drive, San Ra--on area. 00409 September 2, 1975 Summary, continued Page 4 Adopted following numbered resolutions: 75/691, accepting as complete contract with Ted R. Jenkin's Company, Inc." for first phase of 1975 Slurry Seal Project, East Richmond Heights and Tara Hills " area; 75/692, approving plans and specifications and fixing September 23, 1975 at 11 a.m. as time to receive bids for Avenida Martinez Slide Repair, EI Sobrante area; 75/693, authorizing Chairman to execute Grant Deed to State for small parcel of land in connection with required widening of State Highway 4; 75/694, 75/697, and 75/698, fixing Oct. 21, 1975 at 10:30 a.m. as time for public hearing on proposed abandonments of Campo Calle from Quandt Road to Pleasant Hill Road, Lafayette area; most easterly end of Hawthorne Drive, 'tlalnut Creek area; and railroad grade crossings at Warner Road and Del Porto Road, Oakley area, respectively; 75/695, accepting highest bid received at public auction on Aug. 16 for sale of county—oL:ned property at 1000 Sanders Drive, Maraga area; 75/,696, approving map and agreement for Subdivision 4444, Walnut Creek area; 75/699, accepting as complete construction improvements in Subdivision 4295, Danville area; retained cash deposit for one year; and accepted Diablo Road Widen— ing, Richard Lane, Scotch Court and Soda Place as county roads; 75/700, approving schedule of itemized fees for documents and photographic services recommended by Sheriff—Coroner, effective Sept. 1, 1975; 75/702, approving increase for ground rental of lease with George Valente et"ux (originally Brabant & Sullivan), Buchanan Field Airport; 75/703, providing compensation adjustments for certain management classifica— tions, taking into account those negotiated by employee organizations. Acknowledged receipt of Government Operations Committee report on proposal of Attorney T. J. Coll that consideration be given to amending the County Ordinance Code to allow transfer of card_room licenses, and deferred action thereon until Sept. 10, 1975. Dissolved certain Board—appointed committees whose functions had been completed. Recessed into Executive Session for discussions of salary m-tters and to obtain legal counsel on matters involving potential litigation; following the Executive Session the Chairman announced that the decision on the referendum petition re the Blackhawk Boundary Reorganization would be made by the Board on Sept. 10, 1975 at 11:15 a.m. Fixed tax rates for FY 1975-76 to be levied on each $100 of assessed value of property for county district and service areas, school districts and special school programs, other districts governed by local boards and other agencies collecting taxes on the county tax rolls. Approved inclusion of additional revenue of $130,000 (sale of real property) , in county budget and fixed County tax rates to be levied for FY 1975-76. Awarded contract to Remmil Corporation of Oakland for construction of a Rear Yard Drainage System, Canyon Road, I:oraga area, and to. Appolo Concrete, Inc. for construction of a Median Opening en John Glenn Drive, Concord area. Adopted Resolution No. 75/701 approving recommendation of the County Solid Uaste Management Policy Committee with respect to resource recovery. Authorized Chairman to execute applications for Federal funding to provide a Job Opportunities Program authorized by Title X of the Public Works and Economic Development Act -of 1965, as amended, to the U. S. Department of Commerce and Labor and the Housing and Urbzn Development. Established the County Advisory Council on Aging and appointed members thereto; and took action to terminate existing advisory council on aging. W41G Y , s� Y ! A S 1 d" IP precedng. docutnents.�. consist: Of 410. pages. � i A� s w� ra deINL w SO T 4 +�% - s ✓. mri a -_fir��. .yy ; r; �) d S �r�o*t 1Y Y Yom'" 3 ( $yY q f L 3 x.f f � # f T f tp WON mru'`*Yvax.�✓. -t