HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 11052002 - D2 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS . -r': : pl...
` Contra
h1. ... Costa
FROM: DENNIS M. BARRY, AICP
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR County
DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 2002
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA
SPECIFIC PLAN (SP2002-02) and APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED-UNIT DISTRICT
REZONING (RZ023116) AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (DP023041)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. OPEN the public hearing and receive testimony on the proposed Amendment to the
Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan and proposed Rezoning and Preliminary
Development Plan, and CLOSE the public hearing;
2. FIND the Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate and has been prepared consistent
with State and County CEQA guidelines;
3. ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration
4. CONSIDER The County Planning Commission's recommendation regarding the proposed
amendment to the Specific Plan and APPROVE the proposed Specific Plan Amendment
related to a reduction of setbacks for the Sub-areas 11 and 12 (BART Property) and
elimination of the Treat Blvd. pedestrian overcrossing at Oak Road;
5. ADOPT the attached Resolution with Growth Management Findings and Preliminary
Development Plan Findings; and
6. APPROVE the Planned-Unit District Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan;
7. ADOPT the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and
8. DIRECT the Community Development Department to file a Notice of Determination and pay
the filing fees to the County Clerk.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATUREW:
ACTION OF BOARD ON N UArnbe r 51, APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER_,xx
SEE ATTACHED ADDENDUM
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND
xx-_UNANIMOUS(ABSENT Nnna) CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
AYES: NOES: ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN
Contact: Maureen Tams, Community Development-335-1250 ATTESTED November 5 , 2002
JOHN SWEETEN, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: Community Development Department SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMININISTRATOR
Public works Department
Redevelopment Agency .
Building Inspection Department BY , DEPUTY
Bay Area Rapid Transit District
November 5, 2002
Board of Supervisors
Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan Amendment and Rezoning/Preliminary Development Plan
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The cost of this project has been shared by the County Redevelopment Agency and
the assigned developer of the project, Ironhorse Associates. The County's portion
has been included in the Redevelopment Agency budget. The Agency will be
reimbursed its costs as part of a subsequent Disposition and Development/Lease
Agreement.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATONS
The County sponsored a design Charrette for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Property in early
2001. The process began with a research and education phase in January 2001, followed by
six days of public meetings on various topics(i.e., parking, pedestrian bridge, swim club, etc.),
presentations, open studio, etc. The review and revise phase of the Charrette included two
meetings in April 2001. A final meeting, focusing on the Codes was held in December 2001.
Over 500 people participated in the Charrette process, which included over 85 hours of open
public session. The Summary Report was accepted by the Board of Supervisors December
2001. The Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan application is consistent with the
outcome of the Charrette.
Under consideration are; (1) Amendments to the Specific Plan; and (2) approval of the
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Amendments to the Pleasant Hill BART
Station Area Specific Plan proposed include (a) elimination of the Treat Blvd. pedestrian
overcrossing at Oak Road from the Specific Plan and (b) a reduction in the building
setbacks for subareas 11 and 12 (the BART property) of the Specific Plan area. The
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan involve rezoning the site to a Planned-Unit
District and the adoption of the Preliminary Development Plan, consistent with the outcome
of the Charrette. The County Planning Commission considered a recommendation on
these proposals and recommended approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Development
Plan and expressed some concern about the portion of the Specific Plan Amendment
dealing with the pedestrian overcrossing.
The concerns expressed regarding the Specific Plan Amendment were limited to the
elimination of the pedestrian bridge and pedestrian safety at the intersection. The Planning
Commission recommended approval of the amendment, subject to the Board of Supervisor's
consideration of incorporating pedestrian safety facilities to improve pedestrian safety and ease
in crossing Treat Blvd. including inclusion in the final design consideration of such things as:
a. Separate crosswalk surface from Treat Blvd. asphalt such as colored pavers.
b. Surface blinking lights at the crosswalk during cross cycles.
c. A protected wide center island for pedestrians to a light with a walk button.
d. Islands after the right turn lane islands and a right turn lane on westbound Treat turning
into the BART station to narrow the width of the crossing.
e. Yield to pedestrians at the right turn from northbound Oak onto Treat going east.
November 5, 2002
Board of Supervisors
Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan Amendment and Rezoning/Preliminary Development Pian
Page 3
f. Left turn signal from southbound Oak going east on Treat so it doesn't conflict with the
pedestrian movement.
g. Inclusion of a countdown pedestrian signal.
Staff has reviewed the pedestrian safety facilities suggested by the Planning Commission.
From a maintenance standpoint, the separate crosswalk surface (i.e., pavers) would be of
concern for long-term viability of a paving material other that asphalt for the busy Treat Blvd.
Staff concluded that this will not significantly enhance safety since the there is a traffic signal at
the crossing location. While additional painting the asphalt for a high-visibility treatment could
be considered, the standards dictate that this treatment be limited to intersections that are not
signalized. Surface blinking lights on the crosswalk are contrary to current practice because
the crossing is already signalized. This treatment is still experimental and are limited to non-
signalized pedestrian crossings.
The Redevelopment Agency commissioned a traffic study for the proposed removal of the
bridge. The idea of an island refuge was considered, however, it was not recommended to be
implemented because there is not adequate width in the current medians. Additional width
would be necessary to have the six ft width needed for a pedestrian island refuge. This would
require frontage widening and associated tapers. The suggestion of islands at the right turn
lane from westbound Treat Blvd. to northbound Oak Road (the BART Station) already exist.
Yielding to pedestrians that have the right-of-way is already the law. The County has standard
"Observe the pedestrian right-of-way" signs that could be added to the all legs of the
intersection. The traffic engineer confirmed that the existing eight-phase traffic signal cycle
currently does not give a pedestrian right-of-way in conflict with a left-turn movement. The
countdown signal is a feasible suggested feature that can be explored for this intersection and
subject to approval of the California Traffic Control Devices Committee.
Staff is currently in the design phase of the Ironhorse Trail (Treat Blvd. at Jones Road)
overcrossing, which includes adding a right-turn lane from northbound Oak Road onto Treat
Blvd. The pedestrian enhancements discussed could be evaluated further, incorporated into
the design as appropriate and brought forward to the Board for consideration.
The Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan under consideration are consistent with
the outcome of the Charrrette. Consideration of the Preliminary Development Plan includes
adoption of the Regulating Plan, Principles and Regulations and Architectural Codes.
Although these Codes provide a far higher level of detail than that which is required for a
Preliminary Development Plan, the Codes provide assurances that the future plans as they
brought forward in the Final Development Plan is consistent with the development and
design consensus for the BART property from the Charrette will be consistent. Many of the
finer details of the plan, such as the road improvements on Jones Road, will be designed
with the Final Development Plan.
November 5, 2002
Board of Supervisors
Pleasant Hill BART station Area specific Pian Amendment and Rezoning/Preliminary Development Pian
Page 4
CONCLUSION
The proposal under consideration is an essential step in the development of the BART property
into a vibrant mixed-use Transit Village. A"Town Architect"has been retained to work with the
developer, their architect, and County staff in developing subsequent site plans,elevations and
use programs consistent with the preliminary development plan and Codes. Undertaking these
steps will assure that a Final Development Plan(s)for the site will consistent with the Charrette
outcome. As required by County Code Final Development Plan hearings will be public and
include public notice.
DAMATlPleasant Hilt BAR`1"1BART Development\BOARD ORDER 11-5-02.doe
Resolution No. 33—2002
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE
PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA OF CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2002, the Contra Costa County Community Development
Department issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
proposed amendment to the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan and the
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for the 18-acre BART property in the
unincorporated Pleasant.Hill BART Station Area; and
WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, the project was scheduled for hearing before
the County Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 8, 2002; at which time an
opportunity to provide testimony was given, and after having fully reviewed, considered
and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter;
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on October 8, 2002, the County Planning
Commission:
1.) Has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring prior to forwarding a recommendation;
2.) Recommends approval of the Amendment to the Specific Plan including
removal of the Oak Road pedestrian bridge from the Specific Plan and the
reduction of building setbacks for Subareas 11 and 12, subject to the Board of
Supervisor's consideration of incorporating pedestrian safety facilities to
improve pedestrian safety and ease in crossing Treat Blvd. including inclusion
in the final design consideration of such things as:
a. Separate crosswalk surface from Treat Blvd. asphalt such as colored
pavers.
b. Surface blinking lights at the crosswalk during cross cycles.
c. A protected wide center island for pedestrians to a light with a walk
button.
d. Islands after the right turn lane islands and a right turn lane on westbound
Treat turning into the BART station to narrow the width of the crossing.
e. Yield to pedestrians at the right turn from northbound Oak onto Treat
going east.
f. Left turn signal from southbound Oak going east on Treat so it doesn't
conflict with the pedestrian movement.
g. Inclusion of a countdown pedestrian signal.
J), /r'=
The decision of the County Planning Commission was given on Tuesday, October 8,
2002,by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners — H.Wong, L,.Battaglia, R. Clary, C.Gaddis,
J.Hanecak, S.Mehlman, M. Terrell
NoEs: Commissioners—
ABSENT: Commissioners—None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners-J-None
1, Dennis Barry, Secretary of the County Planning Commission, herby certify that the
foregoing was duly called and approved on October 8, 2002.
ATTEST:
Dennis M. harry-- Secretary of the
County Planning Commission,
Contra Costa County,
State of California.
Resolution No. 34—2002
RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF
CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REGARDING A REZONING AND
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, RZ023116 AND DP0230419 IN THE
PLEASANT HILL BART STATION AREA OF CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY,
WHEREAS, on September 3, 2002, the Contra Costa County Community Development
Department issued a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
proposed amendment to the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan and the
Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for the 18-acre BART property in the
unincorporated Pleasant Hill BART Station Area; and
WHEREAS, after notice was lawfully given, the project was scheduled for hearing before
the County Planning Commission on Tuesday, October 8, 2002; at which time an
opportunity to provide testimony was given, and after having fully reviewed, considered
and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter;
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that on October 8, 2002, the County Planning
Commission:
1.) Has considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring prior to forwarding a recommendation;
2.) Recommends Rezoning of the site from single-family (R-15) to Planned-Unit
District(P-1)
3.) Recommends approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, subject to the
Conditions of Approval, including the Regulating Plan, Principles and Regulations,
and the Architectural Codes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County Planning Commission makes the
following findings pursuant to the Contra Costa County General Plan Growth
Management Element and County Code Sections 84-66.1406.
1. Growth Management Element Performance Standards Findings
a) ;Traffic: Traffic impacts have been addressed in the DEIR for the Pleasant Hill BART
Station Specific Plan. A comparison of the proposed project's trip generation
characteristics with the alternatives evaluated in the 1998 EIR shows that the traffic
generated by the project is within the lower and upper range of impacts and
mitigation measures identified in the 1998 EIR.
b) Water: Contra Costa Water District indicated they have capacity to serve the project.
e) Sanitary__Sewer: The project is within the boundaries of the Contra Costa Central
Sanitary District, service is planned for the area.
d) Fire Protection: The subject property is within the Contra Costa Fire Protection
District Boundaries and the project is required to comply with all of the District's
requirements, including the payment of fees.
e) Public Protection: Although no comments were received from the Sheriffs
Department on the Preliminary Development Plan, staff expects comments from the
Sheriffs department when the plans are more detailed when the Final Development
Plan(s) are submitted.
f) Parks and Recreation: Park dedication fees are required per County Ordinance for
residential projects. The fee is used to provide parks/recreational opportunities
within the area and would offset any impacts to parks.
g) Flood Control and Drainage: The project will be required to meet all collect and
convey requirements.
2. Findings For Approval Of A Preliminary.Development Plan:
The proposal is consistent with Section 84-66.1406 of the zoning ordinance which
requires the following findings be made prior to granting the preliminary development
plan approval:
a) The applicant intends to start construction within two and one-half years from the
effective date of zoning change and approval. The applicant has expressed their
desire to begin construction of the beginning phase of the proposed project once the
plan is finalized and afnal development plan is approved.
b) The proposed planned unit development is consistent with the County general plan.
The proposed project is consistent with the mixed-use general plan designation, the
policies of the Pleasant Hill BART Station area Specific Plan, and compatible with
other uses in the vicinity.
c) In the case of residential development, it will constitute a residential environment of
sustained desirability and stability, and will be in harmony with the character of the
surrounding neighborhood and community, The proposed development locates high-
density residential uses inclose proximity to existing residential uses. The project is
located at a transit center, near existing and proposed neighborhood retail services.
d) In the case of commercial development, it is needed at the proposed location to
provide adequate commercial facilities of the type proposed, and that traffic
congestion will not likely be created at the proposed center, or will be obviated by
presently projected improvements and by demonstrable provisions in the plan for
proper entrances and exits,and by internal provisions for traffic and parking,and that
the development will be an attractive and efficient center which will fit harmoniously
into and will have no adverse effects upon the adjacent or surrounding development.
The proposed commercial development meets the policies of transit-oriented
development and the Pleasant Hill BART Specific Plan. Traffic impacts have been
adequately addressed in the 10BIR for the Pleasant dill BART Specific Plan. No
variances to the number of parking spaces are requested.
e) The development of a harmonious, integrated plan justifies exceptions from the
normal application of this code. The planned-unit zoning district is the appropriate
zoning designation for the proposed project and is consistent with the principles of
transit-oriented development, and the goals of the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area
Specific Plan and County General Plan.
The decision of the County Planning Commission was given on Tuesday, October 8,
2002, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners — H.Wong, L.Battaglia, R. Clark, C.Gaddis,
J.Hanecak, S.Mehlman, M. Terrell
NOES: Commissioners—
ABSENT: Commissioners—None
ABSTAIN: Commissioners—None
1, Dennis Barry, Secretary of the County Planning Commission, herby certify that the
foregoing was duly called and approved on October 8, 2002.
ATTEST:
"t�r � h - -
Dennis M. Barry— Secretary of th
County Planning Commission,
Contra Costa County,
State of California.
A•3
tr+
IMf ,.•
�� i+ + P R•JYr'',•'��YSti;JT`}J�Y` rJ'.ti°°
.•.y�Yr
,r �•� Jr r. M 77
+ A-3
1', J
Yl f{ ..{}• i ..
f..
7BI,'
Rezone From 0"1
To
�11 Area
Planning
Commission,State of California,do hereby certify that Costa
corr"�, Chair Of County
t this is a true and
indicating thereon the d
in the ecision of the Contra
matter of Costa Coun
ty Planning Commission
AT MT:
• aCosta
rt
= cf
ORDINANCENO. 2=-45
(Re-Zoning Land in the Pleasant Hill Area)
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows:
SECTION I: Page L-14 of the County's 1978 Zoning Map(Ord.No.78-93)is amended by
re
re-zoning the land in the above area shown shaded on the map(s)attached hereto and incorporated
herein(see also Community Development Department File No.„RZ=16 )
0-1 LimitedOffice
FROM: Land use District R-15_ { Single Family Residential 1
TO: Land Use District P-1 ( Planned Unit 1
and the Community Development Director shall change the Zoning Map accordingly,
pursuant to Ordinance Code Sec.84.2.003.
SECTION II. EFFECTIVE BATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage,
and within 15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors
voting for and against it in the ,a newspaper
published in this County.
PASSED on by the following vote:
Supervisor Ave No Absent Abstain
1. 1.Gioia { ) { ) ( } { )
2. G.B Uilkema { ) ( } { ) ( )
3. D.Gerber { ) ( } ( ) { )
4. M.Desaulnier ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
5. Federal Glover ( ) { ) ( ) ( )
ATTEST: John.Sweeten,County Administrator
and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Chair of the Board
By ,Dep. (SEAL)
ORDINANCE NO. 2DQ2 45
RZ023116 C.C.C.Redevelopment Agency
--/, did
ADDENDUM TO ITEM D.2
November 5, 2002
The Clerk of the Board heretofore noticed the hearing before the Board of Supervisors to
consider the recommendations,of the County Planning Commission to approve an amendment to
the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Specific Plan to eliminate the Oak Road pedestrian bridge
from the Specific Plan, and reduce building setbacks for subareas 11 and 12; rezoning the site
from Single-Family Residential Zoning District (R-15)to a Planned-Unit District (P-1); and
approval of a Preliminary Development Plan to construct 290,000* -456,000 sq. ft. of office,
274-446* multi-family residential units(including 50 for-sale units), 42,000 sq, ft, of storefront,
7,000 sq. ft. of Civic use, and the expansion of the existing 1,337 space parking garage with the
relocation of the existing 1,477 surface parking spaces and the 581 parking spaces on the Iron
Horse Corridor, within the specified 18-acre Central County site that includes the Pleasant Hill
BART station, 1,337 space parking garage and 1,477 surface parking spaces.
Maureen Toms, Community Development Department, presented the staff recommendation.
The public hearing was opened. The following persons spoke:
Mark Farrau, Millennium Partners, 735 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94102;
Jeff Ordway, Bay Area Rapid Transit District(BART);
John Ruzek, S.F. Bay Area Pedestrian Action Group,756 Milton Road, Walnut Creek, CA
94595,
Evelyn Stivers, Greenbelt Alliance, 1601 N. Main#105, Walnut Creek, CA 94596;
Ted Pierce, Diablo Valley Commuters Alliance, 3572 Eris Ct., Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
Gene Demar, 1313 Gragg Ln., Concord, CA 94518;
Don Mount, 1309 Gragg Ln., Concord, CA 94518;
Bruce Klimoski, 3529 Torino Way, Concord, CA 94518;
Pat O'Brien, Contra Costa Contra Renaissance Club Sport, 2805 Jones Rd.;
Dick Schermerhorn, Contra Costa Economic Partnership, 1320 Arnold Dr., Martinez, CA
94553;
Helen M. Fehr, Diablo Valley Commuters Alliance, 5320 Likins Ave., Martinez, CA 94553;
Robert Frederick, 22 Cedarbrook Ct., Walnut Creek, CA 94597;
Peter Duncan, 112 Roble Road, Walnut Creek, CA 94597;
The following person did not speak but left his written comments.
Richard Dave, 4416 Sugarland Ct., Concord, CA 94521
The public hearing was closed. The Board discussed the matter and took the following action:
CLOSED the public hearing; APPROVED staff recommendations with a modification under
Recommendation#4: strike out starting with"and elimination of the Treat Blvd. Pedestrian over
crossing at Oak Road''; Modifying#6 Approve the Planned-Unit District Rezoning and
Preliminary Development Plan with an added condition regarding the requirement for
participation in the bridge funding; INTRODUCE the ordinance No. 2002-45 giving effect to the
rezoning; WAIVE reading and SET November 12th for adoption.
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
Adopted this Order of November 5,2002,by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Uilkema,Gerber,DeSaulnier,Glover and Gioia
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO.2002/719
SUBJECT: IN THE MATTER OF AMENDMENTS TO THE PLEASANT HILL
BART STATION AREA SPECIFIC PLAN
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES that:
WHEREAS, there is filed with this Board and its clerk a copy of Resolution No. 33-2002,
adopted by the County Planning Commission,which discusses proposed amendments to the Specific Plan
for the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area(#SP2002-02). The resolution makes reference to the proposed
amendments related to building setbacks for Sub areas 11 and 12 and the elimination of the Treat Blvd.
pedestrian overcrossing at Oak Road.
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2002,the Board held a hearing on said Specific Plan Amendments
discussed by the Planning Commission Resolution 33-2002. Notice of said hearing was duly given in the
manner required by law. The Board, at the hearings called for testimony of all persons interested in this
matter. After taking testimony,the Board closed the public hearing.
WHEREAS, the Board finds that the proposed Amendment to the Specific Plan will not have a
significant impact on the environment. An Environmental Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration,
and Mitigation Monitoring Program was prepared and adopted by the Board, after having considered all
comments received thereon, for the Pleasant Hill Bart Station Area Specific Plan Amendments. These
actions satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and County CEQA
Guidelines.
WHEREAS, the Board members having fully considered these Specific Plan Amendments
discussed in Resolution No. 33-2002, the recommendations included in the County Community
Development Department staff report dated November 5, 2002, hereby adopts the Amendment to the
Specific Plan related to the reduction of building setbacks for Sub areas 11 and 12. The Board dcferred
consideration of the Amendment to the Specific Plan related to the elimination of the Treat Blvd.
overcrossing at Oak Road until such time that a Final Development Plan is considered for the BART
property. The Beard further resolved that although the developer of the BART property would be
required to participate in the financing of the bridge, no money should be collected from the developer to
pay for the bridge until a final decision related to the bridge is made.
WHEREAS, the Board made the following findings pursuant to the Contra Costa. County General
Plan Growth Management Element and County Code Sections 84-+66.1406.
1
I. Growth Mammo-atElmwnt ftakmme Standards Findiny
a) Tr,ft: Traffic impacts have been addressed in the DEIR for the Pleasant Hill BART Station
Specific Plan. A comparison of the proposed project's trip generation characteristics with the
alternatives evaluated in the 1998 EIR shows that the traffic,genu by the project is within
the lower and upper range of impacts and mitigation measures identified in the 1998 EIR.
b) : Contra Costa Water District indicated they have capacity to serve the project.
c) Sm%tM Sewer: The project is within the boundaries of the Contra Costa Central Sanitary
District,service is planned for the arca.
d) Firc Pratection: The subject property is within the Contra Costa Fire Protection District
Boundaries and the project is required to comply with all of the District's requirements,
including the payment of fees.
c) Public Prrrtecaion: Although no comments were received from the Sheriff's Department on the
Preliminary Development Plan, staff'expects comments from the Sheriffs department when
the plans are more detailed when the Final Development Plan(s)are submitted.
f) Parks and Recreation: Park dedication fees are required per County Ordinance for residential
projects. The fee is used to provide parks/recreational opportunities within the area and
would offset any impacts to parks.
g) Flood Con ! aW Drakinaae: The project will be required to meet all collect and convey
requirements.
1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct
copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date
shown
ATTESTED_ November 5, 20Q2
John Sweeten, Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors and County Administrator
By: Deputy
Orig. Department: Cleric of the Board
Cc: Director of Community Development
Director of Public Works
County Counsel
County Administrator
2
C�Cl 2/- 2//0