Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 01011972 - Budget 1972-74 STORED: REEL #a33NDEX 'L.MAP # BOX 4.. IN THE BOARD OF SUFFiVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Referrals ) to Administration and Finance } September y; 1972 Com,?ittee of the Board. The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W, N. Boggess) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to aforesaid referrals: Referral Late Item Recommendation 1-31-72 Report of County Administrator Acknowledge receipt on alternate methods of finan- and retain on file cing now county jail. for reference; public hearing on jail project to be held after receipt of architectural plans and report from Bay Area Social Planning Council; remove as committee referral. 1m31-72 Report of 1971 Grand Jury Report of County Audit Finance Committee*" Administrator on this Grand Jury Committee report approved Dy Board. Remove this item as a committee referral. 5-23-72 Employment of a part-time Funds for employment secretary for the County . of a part-time Recreation and Natural Executive Secretary Resouirces Commission; also included in Final referred to Administrator Budget; remove as for consideration during committee referral. 1972-1973 budget review. 6-20-72 L/1972-1973 Budget Message. Committee submitted its recommendations at Final Budget hearing; remove as committee referral. 6-120N'�2 Let pr from Local No. 1 Progress toward iningviolation of resolution acceptable -Employee Relations to all parties being ce by H. D. Funk., made in discussions County Auditor-Controller. involving Local No. 1, department head, and Employee Relations ' Officer. Remove as committee referral at this time. Referral Date Item Recommendation 7 �11�-72 County .Juvenile Justice Funds in the amount of. Commission resolution $10,000 included in the urging approval of Final Budget for pilot Probation Department program on recor=enda-- request for allocation tion of committee; of $24,000 for adult remove as comtii.ttee Probation Emergency Board referral. and Care Fund. 7-31-72 Letter from Martinez Consultations with Human Resources Commission interested repreaenta= and Council for Civic tives held prior to Unity of Orinda, Lafayette adoption of Final and Moraga requesting Budget; remove as attendance at work session committee referral. of County Human Relations Commission budget. 7-3172 Request. from Superintendent Required tax fixed by of Schools for levy of Board of Supervisors on taxes for the maintenance September 1, .,1972; of Regional Occupational. remove as aomzittee Programs; also referred to referral. County Administrator and County Auditor-Controller. 8--22-72 Analysis and summary of Recommendations con- recommended reductions for sidered by com<nitte-e 1972-1973 County Budget .as and full Board of proposed by Contra Costa Supervisors in Final Taxpayers Association. Budget determinations; .remove as commiittee. referral. The Board having considered :gE 3, committee repor't .and determined the recommendations to be appropr3�a. NOW.. :TH6RSFORE, on motion of Supervisor Moriarty, 4ecgxj�6d by Supervisor J: . P:. Kenny, IT IS BY 2'HB 'BO9iD.0ADM= that 'tbek aforesaid recommendstions of its Admiriin.tration and Finance Committee' are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by -the following votes AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kgmiyv A.• A. Dias, . E. Moriarty, W. ,, .N-e Bogge sa, R. A. Linscheid.. NOES: Bone.- AB3£NT: Mone. I HERM CERTIFY that the toreg Ang Is a true and, correct copy of an order 'entered on the minute., of said Board of Supervibora on the date aforesaid, cc: Administrator Witness my band wW the Seal of.the . County Counsel Board of Supervisors affixed this nth day Welfare Director of September, 1972. Sheriff W. T. PAASCHs CLRRK Auditor auntC le k reastre1-j�c Cgileator By ersonne ec or Deanna etr e pprobatti n Officer 3uperinten en or Schools Deputy Clerk �a�urgl.R eaourc°a end M t esio lesources LBC4o. f is $ A L} i �c CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Inter - Office Memo Date: June 20, 1972 To: Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. F. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) From: Clerk of the Board Subject: 1972-1973 Budget Message The Board today referred to you the 1972-1973 Budget Message. cc: County Administrator dah i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 20 19 72 In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of 1972-1973 Budget Message of the County Administrator. The County Administrator having submitted his BUDGET MESSAGE for the fiscal year 1972-1973 ; NOW, THEREFORE , on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said BUDGET MESSAGE is ACKNOWLEDGED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said BUDGET MESSAGE is APPROVED as the basis for the preparation and issuance by the County Auditor-Controller of the 1972-1973 Proposed County Budget; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the BUDGET MESSAGE is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E . Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. NOES : None. ABSENT: Supervisors A. M. Dias and W. N. Boggess . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc: Auditor Supervisors Administrator affixed this 20th day of June , 1972 Board Committee W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Do othy A. Harkness H24 4/72 tone 0 • In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, St to of California August 28 , 19 7 In the Matter of Approved budget request of County Superintendent of Schools regarding Regional Occupational Training Programs . This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the 1972- 1973 proposed County Budget; and Floyd Marchus , County Superintendent of Schools, having submitted a request dated July 12 , 1972 to this Board for approval of Regional Occupational Training Program's estimated to cost - $110,266 for the 1972-1973 fiscal year; and Financing of this program will require county taxes in the amount of $38,441 for this fiscal period; On motion of Supervisor W. N. Boggess, seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforementioned budget request is hereby APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None. ABSENT: None . 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of-Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Superintendent of Schools Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Auditor-Con troller Supervisors Administrator affixed this 28th day of August , 19 72 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 19 72 In the Matter of The Adoption of the County Special Districts Budgets for Fiscal Year 1972-1973• The Board of Supervisors having heretofore considered the budgets for County Special Districts (other than Fire Districts) and proposed changes thereto for the 1972-1973 fiscal year; and The County Auditor-Controller having presented to the Board of Supervisors a schedule of budget adjustments incorporating recommended changes for adoption; and On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the public hearing is CLOSED on the Special Districts Budget, the adjustments as presented are APPROVED, and said Budgets are ADOPTED by this Board for fiscal year 1972-1973, as follows. (Type in Special Districts Budgets ) The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid. NOES : None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Auditor-Controller Supervisors affixed this 28th day of August , 1972 &' W. T. PAASCH, Clerk ByDeputy Clerk Laurette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M 0 i l H. DONALD FUtJF•, DIvtSRG'I S;.aEnvt�ok5 A UD:'I bfi.0 C,i7 i20LLCtt INTERNAL AUDIT O NAL.LI L. EOUGHfT AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OFFICE JOHN A. AYLA1D 45,'::TAUT AUDVIOR.CONTRULLER '�`�} +� /�(�c'j %'� '�R. '�j TAX AND SPECIAL 1..N�_R' 1 COSTA.. ��jxeJ.l.�.�,L 1 DISTRICT ACCOUNTING SAM RSIMOTD FINANCE DUILDING ACCOUNTING EEIC MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 ROY a, bt PURCHASING PHONE (415) 228-3000 WALTER A. SrYDEN SYSTEMS ARTHUR T. STURGES.r. August 25, 1972 DATA PROCESSING GLEN TAYLOR VEDT /f�- T. PAAS CH CLC RCI OF SUP ISO.., R Supervisor James P. Fenney, District I 6y .. _.. j Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District II Supervisor James E. Moriarty, District III Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District IV Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District V The attached are changes to our recommended changes for adoption of final budget of August 24, 1972 for County Service Area R-5, South Danville. These changes _ were requested by the Department of Public Works and the attached schedules are to replace those that appear in our recommended changes of August 24, 1972, t H. DONALD FUNK Auditor-Controller 1 4 4 R v( f i .. .•.v_....: ,...._rsr.:.;iM^,'¢•M:. .a. w, ro*k-•c a+m¢`Y 4n,r.! ' ' 7+`°':?R...�..,...Y.. , �0.rif.i my^;*..�,.yvw...ra,;,.».� Y rr;rr;•,v Ilk, w' County Special Districts 1972-73 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Expendi- Total Secd. 1371- 1572- tore j Total Tax Tax 1072 1973 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy ment Rate Rate RECREATION County Service Area - Recreation: Area R-5, South Danville 4,605 4,605 303 4,302 4,302 206 4 , I t r 4 ; s -•>•r vretr;•+'�17t�ty„S.e,; ;r1`!k-,r...n.r,,.:,..t•.+,.Y„r,,,v - -13- . 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Recreation ; R-5 (South Danville) General Services & Supplies 4,200 13 4,187 Reserve for Contingencies 420 2 418 Total Requirements 4,620 15 4,605 1 • ,.». •:'. tHr�R�•p¢yC�aer,+.W9-ixg7...!3r�+t,.ac�.�o!!v-,.el. �...r . . 0.,va•gu ( y pp —o— . f' 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates i Increase Decrease Final Budget Fund District F: Revenue Item Proposed Budget County Service Area - Recreation R-5 (south Danville) General3041 303 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief ___-__04 -- 1 ___,_303 ,LD FUNK DIVtSTON SUPLRVISO FS TOR CONTROLLER INTERNAL AUDIT AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OFFICE JOHN it. AYLARD ONALD L. BOUCH ET 'ASSI:TANT AUD%TOR•CONTROLLER TRT: Ricl ACCOUNTING I`U/fJ CONTRA COSTA BOUNTY DISSA X ACCOUNTING SAF: KtMOTO FINANCE BUILDING ACCOUNTING ROY D. MEEK MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PURCHASING PHONE (415) 228-3000 WALTER A. SEYDEN SYSTEMS ARTHUR T. STURGESS August 24, 1972 DATA PROCESSING GLEN TAYLOR RECEIVE... . T. PAASCH Supervisor James P. Kenny, District 1 CLE Bo LOF SUPE ISORS Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District 2 C A T Supervisor James E. ;•toriarty, District 3 ey Deputy Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District 4 Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District S Enclosed is material covering recommended changes for adoption of final budgets. These are for County Special Districts other than fire districts. The preliminary budgets for these districts were adopted on July 18, 1972. The schedules include districts' requirements for expenditures, revenue other than taxes, and estimated 1972-73 tax rate compared to actual 1971-72 tax rate. These budgets must be adopted by your board on or before August 30, _ 1972. } r 11. DONALD FLANK Auditor-Controller HDF:kt ' } :k a Enclosures r 1 r ' cn • -n • n b C r+ O W. NN NNN t-4 r4 N O :7 -71 -1 -1 ^.7 -77 ^•7 `n 7 0 aa > C O to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-- 1.- 1.- I--+ I-- 1-+ O H " H = •'-3 r+ 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.. 0 0 0 rt n H •-3 Ct (D (D (D (D 0 O (s 0 _ -3 O O O O O O O O 01 -3 W f.1 w n r- O O Q. G•. n 92, C. m ^ n O -i n c+ �r =I: = �a -_r ;r a 4r ti rt '� O r+ z7 •r7 111 cn rt :� V N I-+ ►-• �-• �-• ►� �-• ►r ;� w n n n n n n n n w I I I co O ►-� V tJ t7 0 C% C% W O .ry ►-• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OY r. r A W I--� ►i cn N -n & rt rf rt rt r+ e f c+ ri O n t'• ct tO n 74 I= H H H R H H H H H M O "O > cn n O O DO CD O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G H- :300 C d O C; O ct r► C: •d rr N C C. r• c+ rt w rt y Mc+ H. N N N tA N N N N h 0 `< to O C H tO to H UI n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ct C n n cn H 0 G rF O d d 0 0 d 0 d 0 H W C O w H n H :3 tD CD O tD O (D O O p r• 0 H 1' z w < c+ H. cf c+ n H t10 Oil En W 1- n H :3r a =r =x a zm O c+ < 0• w n O rt O to to m cp v W N1.- to w 3 "17 G» �a CD N I-• > a n O P- 0 •• n (D :j H 'o C rC• � > O W N to ►j •b to rt O 0 tTl n r+ rt c+ to w •77 t� o �• � H cD Ot A r rt'd G X t A t-+ Q` 1+ W W I.- N 1••• N W-11C H b C% C% -4 I.- A co to 00 �1 N C. 11 A C. I.- t7 C• �1 A N O H 0 O to Ct N I-- V to M W tD to N 00 (n C` 1-+ tD 00 0o V V A W V W d O d N 000 V VtD r- A1- -4 Ct OtnNODC L40CN V tnA -4 H N• N 07O0tnN to Vt7N N W ooN VtnO O Ln tD V LOUIN W t to W (n ►- VtO0% tO -4CO A ►-+ ONVUIOAtoa. A ACnUI 1 (D 00 Oo 1a17 0 Co O CD 0 C to to Ul Il N d W Y V V 0 F; W Ul I.- ►� � pl V V N N (D F+ tD cItd N /�� CD O A ►-+ A N W W ►-+ N 1 • N d .0 rt V Ot V N A OD Ul 00 V N C% r A V I.- tD C• V A N r+ Z {Sl O Ot N r W t0 OD W CD to V 47 Ut C` 1-, t7 W W V V A W V W W. 1-• Y V V V V V V V H n to O Oo V 11 tD A A I-+ V to O to N 0. CC CC O C% N V W A V Q O 00 00 1 C% I--• N w V tD N W W 00 N V Ul P.-O to to V to Ut N 1 I.- O N W Ul 1-+ A 4J 0 O V 00 Ot r O N V to N A tD Ct A A N Ul to:3 V ct N`< . 1 V (n W•d (D •� n Ln A Iii. < w v W N to h+ W W I•+ 00 d w w r to to �l W to I tD to r to N CD O A (4) W N w w Ir A N N r to to V to W Ul co O Ct tD tD O W -1 Ct +-� t•+ 0% A d I+ C • O O` C. to tD A tD N �t Ul O OD A t.- W t7 i-• V O W UI A W W C d N A ON N Ot 1•+ N tD N O N A N Ct to tO 0 0 0 0 W A I-- W tD d ►-+ CL rt V V N 1- to t7 O W 00 OD V W A tD O V W to O A A Ct C\ N GQ G QQ H O N- ct n r: N l- 7� ►� Y tD W l.- ►-+ 0 O w O t-• A N N -4 r U1 V A W O 0 .0 x rt N F-• N t" N A o^D OD OD 0% N O to O O N W V W W rt w Ln W -4 0 -4 0% to V V V Y V V V Y 1•d. r YO V VC• NVtYDUW A OOW H Ct A to to W O W O I-+ C% Oo Co O tD to Ct W -41- W co C W 1-+ A tD W UI to O ON Ct W V 00 tD tD tD N O 0o tD W I (D tr1 t1 W to Ct C• tD tD w - 00 1 In Nt-� 1--• [ C: N I-� W A 1--� ►-� W tD W C% < N 0 C .i O Ct ► N V tD C% A tD W to (D O A V A A GN W A V d C• ` 00 W ON Go to 1-+ N OD I-� N W W to N OD 1•-+ O A W C• 00 OC N N 00 C+O w � X i O N to CAI f-A 0.00 ~ (D (D w tD t ►-+ I-+ 1-+ N N A O N N N 1 A A N W 00 ft C X OA Ul n1 V O V to Ct V 00 at N V O tD Oo W W ON W r• 00 V to Do ►-+ 0 W IU.l U7 to 0 u, V O7 N Oo Ln V A W O V N N tD O tJ V V W N r Z. N tp Ct CO I✓ UI W N I W W O 4-% Go00 O NW V tGr ` c` -3 X: C. C, CAN '7 G7 i CJ I� W W ►� O N O F-• ►� �' O W W tD I w t:J to to to N N UI L-I +^- A UI W C' U: G: N Ut to I-- rr X V V 00 A Ot00 00 CI OC O OC C) C) lD [JN • � 1 GI N ► N W I� O r O r ►-• ►• .- r y jy t J ¢1 fJ to ti to I • W UI N •C- L' C W G f"I U. co N t!i Ut UI CC X V V O C• A 0 0 O O O O O C O O C O O (.1; N W N I ,,.....�-x,i,. .e,. r,/;:>Y^n;r,Y Sl.r..:,....t,.• ..,yv5`t_ ..::... •tr.:f ?' t. 4 .. ..�..r.. - ., yy County Special Districts - 1972-73 Final Budget - Available Amount to Requirements Financing w be Raised by Taxes Expendi Total Secd. 1971- 1972- ture Total Tax Tax 1972 1973 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy ment Rate Rate PRO'T'ECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY (Cont.) Storm Drain Maintenance Districts: District #1 386$ 70 386$ 70 282,943 103.,627 2,888 100,739 .550 .300 District #4 22,024 22,024 14,031 7,993 285 7,708 .040 .040 Total Sotrm Drain Maintenance Districts 408,594 408,594 296,974 111,620 3,173 108,447 Countv Service Area - Drainage: Area D-2, Walnut Creek 65,000 65,000 65,000 L Area D-3, Antioch 44,000 44,000 44,000 Area D-12, Sandmound Acres 1,250 1,250 75 1,175 1,175 .214 Total County Service Area - 110,250 110,250 109,075 1,175 1,175 Drainage Countv Service Area Police: Area P-1, Crockett-Valona 8,615 8,615 2,320 6,295 155 6,140 .104 ,108 Area P-2, Danville-Alamo 57,580 57,580 11,931 45,649 1,205 44,444 .072 ,067 Area P-4, Orinda 55,000 55,000 2,907 52,093 13,187 50,906 .109 .084 Total County Service Area - 121,195 121,195 17 ,158 104,037 2,547 101,490 Police TOTAL PRO'T'ECTION TO PERSONS & 7,962,662 810,669 8,773,331 6,808,045 1,965,286 110,415 1,854,871 PROPERTY HEALTH & SANITATION Sanitation Districts: 563 District #3, Debt Service 11,588 233,975 2450563 245.1 District 4#5 122041 1,838 13,879 13,879 District 105, Debt Service 1,574 2,484 4,058 4,058 ..,C, County Special District 1972-73 Final Budget Available Amount to - Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Expendi- Total Secd. 1971- 1972- ture Total Tax Tax 1972 1973 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy ment Rate Rate HEALTH 6 SANITATION (Cont'd) Sanitation District (Cont'd) : District #7A 1,240,053 1,240,053 1,(197,452 142,601 907 141,694 .698 1.207 District #7A, Cap. Out. Res. 181,163 181,163 181,163 District #7A, Debt Service 28,622 28,622 23,521 5,101 399 4,702 .346 ,053 District #7B 9,066 21 9,087 9,087 District. #78, Debt Service 11,800 10,797 22,597 22,597 District #15 3,917 3,917 3,917 District #19 53,806 53,806 53,806 Total Sanitation District 115532630 2492115 1,802,745 1,655,043 147,702 1,306 146,396 County Service Area - Sewer: Area S-1, Sandmount Slough 411 411 411 Area S-2, Oakley 7,370 7,370 7,370 Total County Service Area - 7,781 7,781 7,781 Sewer TOTAL HEALTH & SANITATION 1,561,411 249,115 1x,810,526 1,662,824 147,702 1,306 146,396 HIGHWAYS 8 BRIDGES County Service Area - Lighting: Area L-32, Kensington 16,239 16,239 2,851 130388 81 13,307 .086 .085 Area L-41, Nest County 57,741 57,741 123,167 45,574 713 44,861 ,145 .134 Area I.-42, North Central County 30,512 30,512 4,456 261056 844 25,212 .173 ,156 Area L-43, {gest Pittsburg 301770 30,770 62950 23,820 855 22,965 ,229 .210 Area L-45, South Central County 68,169 68,169 30,583 37,586 1,016 36,570 ,123 .082 Area L-46, Northwest County 32,466 32,466 6,177 26,289 913 25,376 .209 .198 Total County Service - 235,897 235,897 63,184 172,713 4,422 168,291 Lighting - e..,'R�,w..r.. ......-..,.?.•.r+.�•t?..,.`rrl^!?"^- ...�.y...: .:...,.....•,...: m'i;..y... ..t.'. ,.,r{ • .,.y County Special Districts - 1972-73 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Expendi- Total Secd. 1971- 1972- ture Total Tax 'Tax 1972 1973 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax Districts ation Reserve ments ments Leve ment Rate Rate HIGIMAYS & BRIDGES (Cont'd) County Service Area - Miscellaneous: Area 11-1, Delta Ferry 17,238 17,238 105 17,133 413 16,720 1.212 1.926 Area M-3, Rollingwood 7,089 7,089 1,685 5,404 52 5,352 .110 . 172 Area M-4, San Ramon 47,217 47,217 8,798 38,419 605 37,814 .120 .180 Area M-6, Danville 13,939 13,939 9,342 4,597 4 4,593 .576 .172 Area M-7, North Richmond 8,708 8,708 2,146 6,562 296 6,266 .174 .197 Area 'rd-8, Byron 3,646 3,646 5,276 (1,630) (1) Area M-9, Crinda 2,130 2,130 578 1,552 1 1,551 .208 . 144 Area '1-11, Crinda Area 22,743 22,743 3,014 19,729 19,729 .S35 Area N1-12, El Sobrante 13,750 13,750 2,S79 11,171 3,7S7 7,414 1.710 .763 Area M-13, Bethel Island 437 437 181 256 256 .123 .359 Area 1-14, Clayton 2,306 2,306 1,450 856 44 812 .299 .094 Area `•1-15, Yynacio Valley 946 946 484 462(2) Area M-16, Clyde Area 2,647 2,647 227 2,420 2,420 .326 (1) No tax rate necessary to finance budget. (2) There is no estimated tai; rate because there is no secured assessed valuation. Total County Service Area - 142.7g6 142,796 35 ,865 106,931 5,172 1()2.927 Miscellaneous County Service Area - Road Maintenance: Area IM-1, Muir Oa s 1,082 1•,082 381 701 2 699 .091 .091 Total County Service Area - 1,082 1,082 381 701 2 699 Road Maintenance y T(}TAI, HIGl31VAYS & BRIDGES 37775 379;775 99,430 28n04 9,596 271-.917 r t t I f i .....-. _.. ,.,.. •t.,..., -_.;..r-r- •...4-•a-^.:w'•`-6 p-h!wv' 'm;v'P•e v•.gj7,: - •.:v �+wAv.r ..t+ 9-: County Special Districts 1972-73 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Expendi- Total Secd. 1971- 1972- ture Total Tax Tax 1972 1973 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Lem ment Rate Rate RECREATION County Service Area - Recreation: Area R-1, Montalvin Manor 43,996 43,996 7,926 36,070 541 35,529 .250 .250 Area R-4, Moraga 174,799 174,799 76,265 98$ 34 2,030 96,504 .250 .250 Area R-5 , South Danville �(� .� 81�� --- 5,227 22 ;ZOO Area R-6, Orinda 70,199 70,199 9,907 60,292 ill 60,181 .010 .100 TOTAL RECREATION 294,589 294,589 94,466 200,123 2,682 197,441 EDUCATION County Service Area - Library: Area LIB-2, El Sobrante 85,598 85,598 63,597 22,001 558 21,443 .100 . 100 Area LIB-5, Pleasant Hill 1,887 1,887 1,887 Area LIB-10, Pinole 98,571 98,571 35,213 63,358 1,672 61,686 .150 .150 Area LIB-11, Oakley 310076 3,076 3,076 Area LIB-12, Moraga 79,629 79,629 20,521 59,108 1,206 57,902 .150 . 150 Area LTB-13, Ygnacio Valley 120,970 120,970 59,783 61,187 2,035 59,152 .100 .100 0 TOTAL EDUCATION 389,731 389,731 184,077 205,654 5,471 200,183 MISCELLANEOUS Contra Costa County Pater Agency 289,217 289,217 108,100 181,117 9,323 171,794 .008 .010 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 289,217 289,217 108,100 181,117 9,323 171,794 GRAND TOTAL 10,877,335 '1;059;784 .11,937,169 8,956;942 2,980,227 138,793 2,842,602 ? s COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Office of Auditor-Controller DISTRICTS GOVERNED MROUGH BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (Other than Fire Districts) Comparison of 1971-72 Budgets, Tax Levy, and Tax Rates with 1972-73 Final Budgets, Tax Levy and Estimated Tax Rate 1971-72 1972-73 Final Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate PROTECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY - County Service Area - Fire F-1, South Richmond 3,513 3,168 .911 3,725 3,322 .953 F-3, Antioch 106,661 67,685 .350 127,455 86,438 .450 F-4, Pittsburg 35,305 24,520 .350 43,594 33,756 .450 Total Service Area - Fire 145,479 95,373 174,774 123,516 t Flood Control Districts Flood Control & Water Conservation 1,161,397 327,054 .020 1,267,296 348,884 .020 Flood Control Zone 1 167,720 45,187 .180 197,659 49,267 .180 Flood Control Zone 2 20,524 318,004 10,899 .180 Flood Control Zone 3B 4,394,845 837,718 .150 5,373,612 927,727 .150 Flood Control Zone 7 124,138 43,079 .180 149,655 24,542 .100 Flood Control Zone 8 11,209 2,118 .030 11,877 2,619 .030 Flood Control Zone 8A 61,105 7,478 .150 66,222 6,527 .100 Flood Control Zone 9 21,627 7,823 .040 25,580 8,533 .040 lood Control Zone 9A 155,176 25,327 .140 78,031 27,372 .140 Total Flood Control Districts 6,117,744 1,295,784 7,487,936 1,406,370 Storm Drainage Districts Zone 1 5,728 5,728 Zone 10 112,581 40,696 .350 159,197 45,628 .350 Zone 13 56,286 35,098 .350 83,479 27,108 .250 Zone 16 37,469 10,110 .126 48,426 10,894 .IS4 Zone 16 Construction 9,929 9,929 Zone 16 Debt Service 23,719 17,977 .224 23,114 17,520 .216 Zone 19 11761 1,761 Zone 22 79,364 19,677 .150 72,865 Zone- 77 52,626 13,021 .350 66,083 12,723 .350 Tota.i Storm Drainage Districts 379,463 136,579 470,582 113,873 ? hes Governed Through Board of Supervisors than Fire Districts) e 1971-72 1972-73 Final Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate Storm Drain :Maintenance Districts District i 225,746 105,485 .3S0 386,570 100,739 .300 District 4 17,018 7,585 .040 22,024 7,708 .040 Total Storm Drain maintenance District 242,764 113,070 408,594 108,447 County Service Area - Drainage Area D-2, Walnut Creek 25,000 65,000 Area D-2, Antioch 44,000 Area D-12, Sandmound Acres 1,250 1,175 .214 Total County Service Area - Drainage 25,000 110,250 1,175 County Service Area - Police Area P-1, Crockett-Valona 8,187 6,345 .104 8,615 6,140 .108 Area P-2, Danville-Alamo 52,039 42,334 .072 573580 44,444 .067 Area P-4, Orinda 48,905 61,677 .109 55,000 50,906 .084 Total County Service Area - Police 109,131 110,356 121,195 101,490 TO'N'AL PROTECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY 7,019,581 1,751,162 8,773,331 1 ,854,871 HEALTH $ SANITATION wnitation Districts District 3 4,S10 3,492 .023 District 3, Debt Service 244,548 245,563 District 5 12,270 13,879 District 5, Debt Service 5,492 4,058 District 7A 1,160,716 78,799 .698 1,240,053 141,694 1.207 District 7A, Capital Outlay Reserve 111,3333 181,163 District 7A, Debt Service 29,484 29,312 .346 28,622 4,702 .053 District 7B 21,885 9,087 District 7B, Debt Service 33,510 22,597 District 15 3,824,634 3,917 Distiict 19 25,875 53,806 Total Sanitation Districts 5,474,257 111,603 1,802,745 146,396 w -3- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors _(Other than Fire Districts) 1971-72 1972-73 Final Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate County Service Area - Sewer Area S-1, Sandmound Slough 411 411 Area S-2, Oakley 7,370 7,370 Total County Service Area - Sewer 7,781 7,781 TOTAL HTALTH $ SANITATION 5,482,038 111,603 1 ,81n,526 146,396 HIGHAAYS & BRIDGES County Service Area - Lighting Area L-32, Kensington 15,631 13,560 .086 16,239 13,307 .085 Area L-41, West County 60,167 48,647 .145 57,741 44,861 .134 Area L-42, North Central County 27,467 22,779 .193 30,512 25,212 .156 Area L-43West Pittsburg 21,597 16,653 .229 30,770 22,965 .210 Area L-44, Port Chicago 1,468 904 .213 Area L-45, South Central County 54,925 43,634 .123 68,169 36,570 .082 Area L-45, ?one 1, South Central County 22,000 22,000 1.664 Area L-46, Northwest County 32,407 25,050 .209 32,466 25,376 .198 Area L-47, East County 8,342 6,393 .228 Total County Service Area - Lighting 244,004 199,620 235,897 168,291 �*nty Service Area - Miscellaneous -rea M-1, Delta Ferry 10,650 10,179 1.212 17,238 16,720 1.926 Area M-3, Rollingwood 7,173 3,419 .110 7,089 5,352 .172 Area M-4, San Ramon 39,662 19,933 .120 47,217 37,814 .180 Area M-6, Danville 16,931 11,714 .576 13,939 4,593 .172 Area M-7, North Richmond 8,575 5,387 .174 8,708 6,266 .197 Area M-8, Byron 2,300 3,646 Area M-9, Orinda 2,103 1,687 .208 2,130 1,551 .144 Area M-11, Orinda Area 12,607 22,743 19,729 .535 Area M-12, E1 Sobrante 16,999 17,009 1.710 13,750 7,414 .763 Area M-13, Bethel Island 344 110 .123 437 256 .359 Area 1111-14, Clayton 1,760 692 .299 211,306 812 .094 Area M-15, Ygnacio Valley 946 Area M-161, Clyde Area 2,647 2,420 .326 Total County Service Area - Miscellaneous 119,104 70,130 142,796 102,927 n -4- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1971-72 1972-73 Final Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate County Service Area - Road Maintenance Area RD-1, ?Muir Oaks 600 556 .091 1,082 699 .091 Total Service Area - Roads 600 556 1,082 699 TOTAL HIGMAYS & BRIDGES 363,708 270,306 379,775 271,917 RECREATION County Service Area - Recreation Area R-1, ;,iortalvin Manor 12,089 6,344 .250 43,996 35,529 .250 Area R-4, Moraga 88,286 83,878 .250 174,799 96,504 .250 Area R-5, South Danville 5,595 5,227 .250 Area R-6, Orinda 74,949 5,581 .010 70,199 60,181 .100 TOTAL RECREATION 175,324 95,803 294,589 197,441 EDUCATION County Service Area - Library Area LIB-2, E1 Sobrante 88,639 21,531 .100 85,598 21,443 .100 Area LIB-5, Pleasant Hill 1,887 1,887 Area LIB-6, Kensington 20,910 19,467 .124 Area LIB-10, Pinole 68,042 59,038 .150 98,571 61,686 .ISO Area LIB-11, Oakley 3,076 3,076 Area LIB-12, Moraga 49,634 50,327 .150 79,629 57,902 .150 Area LIB-13, Ygnacio Valley 58,237 54,499 .100 120,970 59,152 .100 TOTAL EDUCATION 290,425 204,862 389,731 200,183 D`:IciELLANEOTIS Contra Costa County Water Agency 250,712 128,998 .008 289,217 171 ,794 .010 TOTAL MISCELLANFOUS 250,712 128,998 289,217 171,794 GRA,;'D TOTAL 13,581,788 2,562,734 11,937,169 2,842,602 m -1- OFFICE OF COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Recommended Budget 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service :area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Services $ Supplies 3,525 3,525 Reserve for Contingencies 200 200 .Total Requirements 3,725 3,725 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Services v Supplies 111,760 111,760 Fixed Assets 17,938 3,243 14,695 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirements 130,698 3,243 127,455 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Services & Sunplies 40,400 40,400 Fixed Assess 2,194 2,194 Reserve for Contingencies 977 23 1,000 Total Requirements 41,377 2,217 43,594 To adjust budget, to maintain desired tax rate. -2- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Flood Control Contra Costa Flood Control {Vater Conservation General Salaries $ Employee Benefits 895,500 - 895,500 Services & Supplies 220,100 25,000 195,100 Other Charges 150,000 150,000 Fixed Assets 20,800 20,800 Reserve for Contingencies 51,177 45,281 - 5,896 General Reserve 125,000 125,000 Total Requirements 1,312,577 150,000 195,281 1,267,296 To adjust budget as requested by district and to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 1 ('Marsh Creek) General Services & Supplies 88,000 88,000 Fixed Assets 106,000 106,000 Reserve for Contingencies 8,710 5,051 3,659 Total Requirements 202,710 5,051 197,659 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 2 ('Kellogg Creek) General Services & Supplies 2,000 .2,000 Fixed Assets 304,500 304,500 Reserve for Contingencies 3,574 7,930 11,504 Total Requirements 3101*074 7,930 318,004 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 3B (Central Count,,) General Services & Supplies 1,078,000 1;073,000 Other Charges 41,500 41,500 Fixed Assets 2,841,500 192,000 3,733,500 %eserve for Contingencies 278,208 137,092 415,300 General Reserve 700,000 105,312 805,312` Total Requirements 4,939,208 434,404 5,373,612 c .adjust budget as requested by district and to maintain desired tax rate. c1 - -3- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District_ Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Flood Control (continued) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Services & Supplies 28,000 28,000 Fixed Assets 114,000 114,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,389 2,266 7,655 Total Requirements 147,389 2,26T 149,655 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Services v Supplies 11,000 11,000 Reserve for Contingencies 980 103 877 Total Requirements 11,980 103 11,877 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Subzore 8A General Fixed Assets 61,000 61,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,229 1,993 5,.222 Total Requirements 64,229 1,993 66,222 To adiust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Services & Supplies 23,000 500 23,500 Reserve for Contingencies 1,845 235 2,080 Total Requirements 24,845 735 253580 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Subzone 9A General Fixed Assets 75,000 75,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,150 149 3,031 Total Requirements 78,180 .149 78,031 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. -4- 1972-73 X972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage Zone rl (Lafayette Valley Estates) General Other Charges 500 500 Fixed Assets 5,200 1 5,201 Reserve for Contingencies 27 27 Total Requirements 5,727 1 5,728 To adjust budget to available funds. Zone X10 (tt'est of Danville) General Services & Supplies 500 500 Fixed Assets 152,500 152,500 Reserve for Contingencies 945 5,252 6,197 Total Requirements 153,945 5,252 159,197 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone X13 (North West of Alamo) Genera! Fixed Assets 69,000 9,000 78,040 Reserve for Contingencies 4,525 954 S,479 Total Requirements 73,525 9,954 53,479 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate, Zone =I6 (Gregory Gardens) General ' Other Charges 5,000 5,000 Fixed Assets 43,000 43,000 Reserve for Contingencies 4,800 4,374 426 General Reserve 1,541 1,541 Total Requirements 54,341 5,915 48,426 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. t � � n ee Lam. -5- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage (continued) Zone 116 (Gregory Gardens) Debt Service Other Charges 17,757 17,757 General Reserve 5,357 5,357 Total Requirements 23,114 23,114 Zone r16 (Gregory Gardens) Construction Fixed Assets 9,000 27 9,027 01 Reserve for Contingencies 929 27 902 Total Requirements 9,929 27 27 9,929 To adjust budget to loo Reserve for Contingency limitaticn. Zone 719 (North Richmond Area) General Services & Supplies 250 250 Fixed Assets 1,450 1,450 Reserve for Contingencies 61 61 Total Requirements 1,761 1,761 Zone -U22 (N.E. Ycnacio Palley) General Fixed Assets 65,000 65,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,543 3,957 6,500 General Reserve 1,365 1,365 Total Requirements 67,543 5,322 72,865 Tc adjust hudget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone r77 (I;est Sherman Area) General Other Charges 2,000 2,000 Fixed Assets 63,000 63,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,879 796 1,083 Total Requirements 66,579 796 66,083 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. z , L -6- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Bridget Storm Drainage Aiaintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General Services S Supplies 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets 364,000 364,000 Reserve for Contingencies 14,733 4,837 19,570 Total Requirements 381,733 4,837 386,570 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. District -`4 (San Pablo Area) General Services 14 Supplies 16,500 16,500 Fixed Assets 1,000 1,000 Re-serve for Contingencies 1,626 124 1,750 General Reserve 2,774 2,774 Total Requirements 19,126 2,898 22,024 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Drainage 2 General Services & SUDDlies 3,000 3,000 Other Charges 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets 57,000 57,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total :requirements 65,000 65,000 x D-3 & D-12 on page 15 of budgets County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockatt) General Salaries F. Employee Benefits 7,695 7,695 Services u SuDnlies 670 670 Reserve for Contingencies 250 250 Total Reauirements 8,615 5,615 P-2 (Danville-Alamo) General Services & Supplies 53,5S0 53,580 =serve for Contingencies 4,0030 4,000 Total Requirements 57,580 57,580 P-4 ,Orinda) General Service F Supplies 55,000 55,000 Total Requirements 55,000 55'000 -7- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Sanitation. District r 3 (Tara Hills Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,588 11,588 General Reserve 233,975 233,975 Total Requirements 245,563 245,563 District rS(Port Costa) General Services $ Supplies 6,947 6,947 Fixed Assets 4,000 4,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,094 1,094 General Reserve 150 1,688 1,838 . Total Requirements 12,191 1,688 13,870 District #5 (Port Costa) Debt Service Other Charges 1,574 1,574 General Reserve 2,451 33 2,484 Total Requirements 4,025 33 4,058 To adjust budget to available funds. District Y7a O est Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 107,110 1,300 105,810 Fixed Assets 1,090,150 1,300 1,091,450 Reserve fcr Contingencies 13,726 29,067 42,793 General Reserve 57,130 57,130 Total Requirements 1,268,116 30,367 58,430 1,240,053 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. District :` 7A (West Pittsburg Area) Debt Service Other Charges 28,622 28,622 Total Requirements 28,622 28,622 r 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Sanitation (continued) ` District :7A (Iest Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Reserve Fixed Assets 235,177 54,014 181,163 Total Requirements 235,177 54,014 181,163 To adjust budget to available funds. District i#7B (Port Chicago Area) General Services F Supplies 8,242 8,242 Reserve for Contingencies 824 824- General Reserve 4,633 4,617 21 Total Requirements 12,875 824 4,612 9,087 To adjust budget to available funds. District =7B (Port Chicago Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,800 11,800 General Reserve 10,797 10,797 Total Requirements 22,597 22,597 District =15 (Bethel Island Area) General Fixed Assets 2,912 649 3,561 Reserve for Contingencies 290 66 356 Total Requirements 3,202 715 3,917 To adjust budget to available funds. Distric--' 919 (Byron Area) General Services y Supplies 52,125 52,125 Resex-ve for Contingencies 5,212 3,531 1,681 General Reserve 11,763 11,763 Total Requirements 69,100 15,294 53,806 To adjust budget to available funds. -9- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Sewerage S-1 (Sandmourd) General Services F, Supplies 411 411 Total Requirements 411 411 S-2 (Oakley) General Services F Supplies 7,370 7,370 Total Requirements 7,370 7,370 County Service Area - Lighting L-32 (Kensington) Services f, Supplies 14,263 500 14,763 Reserve for Contingencies 1,426 SO 1,476 Total Requirements 15,689 550 16,239 L-41 (West County) General Services & Supplies 52,492 52,492 Reserve for Contingencies 5,249 5,249 Total Requirements 57,741 57,741 L-42 (North Central County) General Services F, Supplies 27,739 27,739 Reserve for Contingencies 2,773 2,773 Total Requirements 30,512 303,512 L-43 (tVest Pittsburg Area) General Services „ Supplies 27,973 27,973 Reserve for Contingencies 2,797 2,797 Total Requirements 30,770 30,770 L-45 (North Central County) General Services & Supplies 61,972 61,972 Psserve for Contingencies 6,197 6,197 ' Total Requirements 68,169 68,169 i i �s� u -10- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Firal Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Lighting (continued) L-46 (North vest County) General Services & Supplies 29,515 29,515 Reserve for Contingencies 2,951 2,951 Total Requirements 32,466 32,466 County Service Area - ?•iiscellaneous _ (Delta Ferry) General Services & Supplies 16,150 1,088 17,238 Total Requirements 16,150 1,088 17,238 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. `•!-3 (Rol lin,-,,i-.,00d) General Services & Supplies 6,420 25 6,445 Reserve for Contingencies 642 2 _ 644 Total Requirements 7,062 27 -."089 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-4 (South San Ramon) General Serviccs t, Supplies 42,550 375 42,925 Reserve for Contingencies 4,255 37 4,292 Total Requirements 46,805 412 47,217 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-6 (Danville Area) General Services & Supplies 12,622 SO 12,672 Reserve for Contingencies 1,262 5 1,267 Total Requirements 13,884 55 13,939 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. - -11- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final ?game of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - :Miscellaneous (continued) M-7 (:Forth Richmond) General Services u Supplies 7,817 100 7,917 Reserve for Contingencies 7S1 10 791 Total Requirements 8,598 110 8,708 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. _ aM-8 (Byron Area) General Services ; Supplies 3,120 195 3,315 Reserve for Contingencies 312 19 331 Total Requirements 3,432 214 3,646 To .adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-9 (Orinda) General Services & SuDrlies 1,907 30 1,937 Reserve for Contingencies 190 3 193 Total Requirements 2,097 33 2,130 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. NI-11 (Orinda Area) General Services & Supplies 19,526 1,150 20,676 Reserve for Contingencies 2,067 21,478 �� Tota_ Requirements 22,743 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-12 (E1 Sobrante Area) General Services & Supplies 7,030 420 7,500 Fixed assets 5,000 5,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,208 42 1,250 Total Requirements 13,288 462 13,750 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works -12- 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final Tvame of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (continued) M-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Services $ Supplies 398 398 Reserve for Contingencies 39 39 Total Requirements 437 437 M-14 (Clayton Area) General Services & Supplies 2,047 50 2,097 Reserve for Contingencies 204 5 209 Total Requirements 2,251 55 2,306 ' To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-15 (Ygnacio Valley) General Services & Supplies 790 70 860 Reserve for Contingencies 79 7 86 Total Requirements 869 77 946 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. NI-16 (Clyde Area) General Services Supplies 1,596 811 2,407 Reserve for Contingencies 159 81 240 Total Requirements 1,755 892 2,647 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. County Service Area - Roads RD-1 (MUi r Oak-s) General Services & Sunnlies 805 179 984 Reserve for Contingencies 50 48 98 Total Requirements 855 227 1,082 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. -13- 1972-73 1772-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Countv Service Area - Recreation R-1 (,Montalvin 'Manor) General Services &.Supplies 10,076 290 9,786 Fixed Assets 34,500 290 34,210 Reserve for Contingencies 4,457 4,457 Total Requirements 49,033 5,037 43,996 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. ' R-Y (Moraga) General Services & Supplies 3,910 3,910 Fixed Assets 156,471 156,471 eser:re for Contingencies 15,090 672 _14,418 Total Requirements 175,471 672 174,799 R-5 (South Danville) General Services & Supplies 4,200 887 5,087 Reserve for Contingencies 420 88 508 Total Requirements 4,620 975 G , ,a2S, / 7,� 5,595 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rat R-6 (Orinda) General Services c; Supplies 11,650 11,650 Fixed Assets 112,363 60,200 52,168 Reserve for Contingencies 11,622 5,241 6,381 Total Requirements 135,640 65,441 70,199 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Library LIB-2 (EI Sobrar_te) General Fixed Assets 84,661 63 84,593 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 -,000 - Total Reouirenents 85,661 63 33,598 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. f� a to -14- 1972-7.3 1972-73 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service area - Library (continued) LIB-5 (Pleasant Hill) General Services & Supplies 1,887 1,857 Total Requirements 1,887 1,887 LIB-10 (Pinole) Genral Fixed Assets 117,415 20,844 96,571 Reserve fcr Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Requirements 119,415 20,844 98,571 To.adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. LIB-11 (Oakley) General Services i Supplies 3,076 3,076 Total Requirements 3,076 3,076 LIB-12 (.Moraga) General Fixed assets 77,606 23 77,629 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Requirements 79,606 23 79- 29 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. LID-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Fixed Assets 119,036 66 118,970 Res.-rve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Reauirements 121,036 66 120,970 To must budges :o maintain desired tax rate. Water A-ency Contra Costa County General Salaries & Employee Benefits 4,800 4,SJ0 Services & Supplies 239,660 IS, 65 253,125 Reserve for Contingencies 24,446 1,846 26,292 Total Requirements 268,906 20,311 289,217 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. } ~ -15- 2A 1972-73 1972-73 Proposed Final ?game of. District Fund —Budget Increase Decrease Budget *County Service Area - Drainage 3 General Services & Supplies 5,070 5,000 Fixed Assets 35,000 35 S000 Reserve for Contingencies 4,000 4,000 Total Requirement 44,000 44,000 *County Service Area - Drainage 12 General Fixed Assets 1,200 1,200 Reserve for Contingencies 50 50 1,250 . Total Requirement 1,250 A 1 -1- OFFICE OF COUNTY ATINTOR-CON17ROLLEP_ Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other Than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Recommended Budget Estimates of Revenue other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates *-strict $ Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget increase Decrease Final Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 179 179 Business Inventory Tax Relief 2 2 181 181 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Homeo,,�ner's Property Tax Relief 620 620 Easiness Inventory Tax Relief 3,696 1 3,695 4,316 1 4,315 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Homeo,:ner's Property Tax Relief 14 14 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,909 3,909 3,923 3,923 Flood Control Contra Costa County General Planning f Engineering 506,000 506,000 Homeoi-Mer's Property Tax Relief 15,111 15,111 Business Inventory Tax Relief 6,661 6,661 527,772 527,772 Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Fedeyal Subvention 2,000 2,000 State Subvention 3,000 3,000 Nomeoi,mer's Property Tax Relief 1,359 1,359 Business Inventory Tax Relief 314 314 6,673 6,673 -2- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General State Subvention 280,000 280,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 170 170 Business Inventory Tax Relief 6 6 280,176 280,176 e 3B (Central County) General Wast Bay Regional Park Subvention 222,000 222,000 State Subvention 646,500 646,500 Federal Subvention 260,000 192,000 452,000 Other Subvention 75,000 75,000 Homeoimer's Property Tax Relief 50,884 50,884 Business Inventory Tax Relief 8,162 8,162 1,262,S46 1922000 1,454,546 Zone 7 (t;'ildcat Creek) General Homeoumer's Property Tax Relief 1,174 1,174 Business Inventory Tax Relief 913 913 2,087 2,087 Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 123 123 Business Inventory Tax Relief 22 22 145 14S Zone 8A General County Subvention 13,000 13,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 405 1 406 Business Inventory Tax Relief 69 69 13,474 1 13,475 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Homeowiner's Property Tax Relief 612 612 Business Inventory Tax Relief 15 1S 627 627 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District s Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Bud-et Zone 9A General State Subvention 3,000 3,000 'Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,106 2,106 Business Inventory Tax Relief 51 51 5,157 5,157 Corm Drain Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General County Subvention 35,000 35,000 Zone 3B Subvention 2,000 2,000 Drainage Fees 7,000 7,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,650 5,650 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,441 1,441 51,091 51,091 _ District n4 (San Pablo Area) General Iioncowper's Property Tax Relief 519 519 Business Inventory Tax Relief 95 95 614 614 County Service Area • D-2 (Walnut Area) General Drainage Fees 50,000 50,000 50,:'100 50,000 D-3 (Antioch) General Drainage Fees 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 D-12 General Hor-,e_owner's Property Tax Relief 75 75 7S 75 -4- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimated Revenue Estimates District Revenue Iter Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General IIomeourner's Property Tax Relief 539 54 485 Business Inventory Tax Relief 137 13 _ 124 676 67 609 ® P-2 (Danville-Alamo) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,533 240 2,293 Business Inventory Tax Relief 160 160 2,693 240 2,453 P-4 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,761 2,761 Business Inventory Tax Relief 146 146 2,907 2,907 County Sanitation District =#5 (Port Costa) General Settler Use Charges 9,676 9,676 9,676 9,676 District 7Aesteneral ( Pittsburgg Area) Interest on Invested Funds 1,000 1,000 Setter Services 2,558 2,558 Parrents in Lieu of Taxes 300 300 Federal Subvention 843,000 848,000 Connection & Development Fees 124,591 124,591 976,449 976,449 District 7A (h1est Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Reserve Bella Vista 29,163 29,163 Connection Development Fees 150,000 150,000 Interest on Investments 2,000 2,000 181,163 181,163 - -S- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District fT Revenue Item Fund Pronosed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget County Sanitiation (Continued) District 7B (Port Chicago Area) General Seiner Use Charges 8,242 8,242 8,242 8,242 District =15 (Bethel Island Area) General Seiner Service Charge 882 882 882 882 District n19 (Discovery Bay) General Sewer Services 37,200 37,200 Engineering Services 1S,nnn _ 15,000 52,200 52,200 County Service Area - Lighting General L-32 (Kensington) Homeoiener's Property Tax Relief 1,021 38 1,059 Business Inventory Tax Relief 12 12 1,033 38 1,071 ® L-41 (1t'est County) General Homeow-ner's Property Tax Relief 4,029 93 4,122 Business Inventory Tax Relief 95 95 4,124 93 4,217 L-42 (North Central County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief. 1,737 11 1X 726 Business Inventory Tax Relief 118 118 11 1,844 -6- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District FT Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget L-43 (N'est Pittsburg Area) General From L-47 589 589 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,509 208 2,301 Business Inventory Tax Relief 187 3 184 3,285 211 3,074 L-45 (North Central County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,531 627 1,904 Business inventory Tax Relief 148 1 147 2,679 628 2,051 L-46 (.North Pest County) General Homeo,cner's Property Tax Relief 2,002 20 1,982 Business Inventory Tax Relief 357 3 354 2,359 23 2,336 County Service Areas - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta Ferry) General Homeoi%m er's Property Tax Relief 98 7 105 98 7 105 • %1-3 (Rollingwood) General Pomeowner's Property Tax Relief 528 528 Business Inventory Tax Relief 5 5 533 533 M-4 (South San Ramon) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,816 2,816 Business Inventory Tax Relief 452 452 3,268 3,268 -7- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget M-6 (Danville Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 148 4 152 148 4 152 M-7 ('north Richmond) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 199 1 198 Business Inventory Tax Relief 344 1 343 S43 2 541 M-9 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 33 33 33 33 M-12 (El Sobrarte) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 21 2 23 Business Inventory Tax Relief 584 584 605 2 607 M-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 11 I1 11 11 111-14 (Clayton) General Homeow;•ner's Property Tax Relief 44 44 44 44 Dl-16 (Clyde Area) General From L-44 41 41 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 114 67 181 Biziness Inventory Tax Relief 3 2 5 158 69 227 Z 2 r -8- 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District Ft Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget County Service Area - Recreation R-1 (Montalvin Manor) General From CC Sanitary -3 16 16 Homeo+tirner's Property Tax Relief 3,748 506 3,242 Business Inventory Tax Relief 84 84 3,832 16 506 3,342 P.- ('ioraga) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4,781 4,781 Business Inventory Tax Relief 280 280 5,061 5,061 R-5 (South Danville) General Homeow,ner's Property Tax Relief 304 64 368 304 64 368 R-6 (Orirda) General Homeoinier's Property Tax Relief 3,266 3,266 Business Inventory Tax Relief 17 17 Interest on Investments 3,150 3,150 6,433 6,433 County Service Area - Libraries LIB-2 (El Sobrante) General IIoneoiY-ner's Prooerty Tax Relief 1,490 1,490 Business Inventory Tax Relief 70 70 1,560 1,560 I LIB-10 (Pinole) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,093 5,093 Bi.-iness Inventory Tax Relief 188 188 5,281 5,281 •� -9- F 1972-73 1972-73 Revenue Fstir:-ates Revenue Estinates District F{ Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget LIB-12 (�ioraga) General Honeowm er's Property Tax Relief 2,869 2,869 Business Inventory Tax Relief 167 167 3,036 3,036 LIB-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,730 3,730 Business Inventory Tax Relief 364 364 4,094 4,094 Contra Costa 11,ater Agency General Homeowmer's Property Tax Relief 7,484 1 7,483 y' Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,085 1 3,084 _ 10,569 2 10,567 z: r.: i ... Y f • IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Recommendations ) of Board Administration and Finance ) August 28, 1972 Committee on 1972-1973 Proposed ) County Budget. ) This being the time fixed for the Board to consider the recom- mendations of its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) on the proposed County Budget for 1972-1973 fiscal year, policy items and various other budget matters; and The Administration and Finance Committee this day having sub- mitted a report (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board) in which the following recommendations are set forth: 1. A number of adjustments as more specifically itemized in schedules attached to the aforesaid report are proposed with the net result being a recommended total county budget in the amount of $166,292,660; this being a net reduction of $5,032,797 from the proposed budget in the total amount of $171,325,457; 2. It is recommended that the number of new personnel to be authorized (as set forth in Table I attached to report) be reduced to 79 full-time permanent, 5 permanent part-time (full-time equivalent of 2 and 16/40) and 1 permanent- intermittent positions. Proposed additional ositions (50) for the Social Service Department and (41 for the Probation Department determined as needed for projected case load increases during the year have been deleted. It is recommended that the County Administrator review the staffing of these departments after six months operations have been completed when work loads are known and can be more precisely projected for the remainder of of the 1972-1973 fiscal period and report his findings as to needed additional staff to this Board; Also, certain programs are recommended in the committee report for implementation in the 1972-1973 fiscal year following submittal of detailed plans to this Board for program approval. Personnel for these programs are not included in the position schedule pending approval of the operating plan and development of the organization and staffing needs to establish such programs; 3. An important method in effectuating a reduction in property tax is to increase revenues from other sources wherever possible. Substantial gains have been made by the county through adoption of procedures and practices whereby the maximum return is realized for medical services provided at the County Hospital and its out- patient clinics . It is recommended that these intensive efforts be continued and that the County Administrator be directed to review with county departments the charges being made for services performed to determine if existing fee structures should be modified to reflect current costs in order that those directly benefiting pay an appropriate amount and that county revenues from services provided be maximized; 4. In furtherance of the objective indicated above, it is recommended that the Medical Social Service Unit currently a component of the County Hospital be transferred to the Social Service Department. Also, administration of certain contracts far rehabilitation services formerly charged to the County Hospital are to be transferred to the Social Service Department. These lateral transfers will not change gross budget requirements but will result in increased subvention revenues; 5. Budget appropriations for the County Hospital. have been decreased $400,000 to reflect the closing of Ward B-2 resulting in a reduction in operating requirements. Also, commitments made to state institutions are being reviewed to transfer patients to the community in order to improve patient care and rehabilitation and to reduce the number of patient days of care for which the county must pay the state . The fiscal effect of this recommended action is the elimination of $539,550 from the proposed budget which represented the estimated amount the county would have had to pay the state for patient care over the state allocation made to the county under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act; 6. Anumber of revisions (as set forth in Table II, Item 14.) are recommended to Plant Acquisition appropriations in order to provide funds for certain priority W000,000 jects. Of major significance is the elimination of appropriated from the Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund for construction of the new jail as it is apparent that the county will not be in a position to advertise this project for construction bids in the 1972-1973 fiscal year. It is recommended that the Board continue with the $0.10 levy for the Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund to raise money for additional plant acquisition; 7. The policy matters identified in the Budget Message for the 1972-1973 fiscal year were reviewed with individual items recommended by the committee set forth in its report. It is recommended that all policy items not specifically included in said report be denied; and The report of the Administration and Finance Committee having been completed, Chairman E. A. Linscheid asked for comments from those persons in the audience who desired to be heard on the proposed County Budget; and Comments having been heard from Mrs. R. S. Long, Mr . W. P. Baker, Executive Vice President, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, and Mr. John Zuppan, President, SHOCKED TAXPAYERS IN REVOLT; and The individual Board members having discussed the recommendations of the Administration and Finance Committee, specific items included in the budget, and the need for state legislation to complete needed tax reform thereby permitting property tax relief; 1 On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing is CLOSED and the recom- mendations of its Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year as revised and modified by the recom- mendations made in the Administration and Finance Committee report of August 28, 1972 is ADOPTED as the Final Budget for the county for the 1972-1973 fiscal year, . as follows: (Type budget in minute book. ) The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid . NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed (S E L} this 28th day of August,. 1972. A W. T. PAASCH, CLERK cc:. County Departments Mrs . Long Mr. Baker By Mr. Zuppan Louret a Kincaid Deputy Clerk In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 1972 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to Clothing Allowance for members of the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Reserves . The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been requested by the County Sheriff-Coroner and recommended by the committee that an appropriation of $3,000 be authorized to increase the clothing allowance for members of the Contra Costa County Sheriff 's Reserves from $50 per year to $75 per year effective October 1, 1972 to recognize in a small way the valuable services provided by the reserves for the community; On motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY TIS BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation of the Administration and Finance Committee is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid . NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Sheriff-Coroner Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Auditor-Controller Supervisors Administrator affixed this 28th day of August , 1972 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Coed Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 19 _Z2 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to allocation for juvenile delinquency prevention. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been requested by the County Probation Officer and the Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Commission that additional professional assistance be provided to local communities to develop delinquency prevention programs and to coordinate juvenile delinquency prevention efforts at the county and community level with special emphasis on drug abuse programs ; and It having been indicated that more effective community services focused on juvenile delinquency could result in reductions in the number of youths referred to county services; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that an appropriation of $11,325 be included in the budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year to intensify juvenile delinquency prevention efforts; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid committee recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes or said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Probation Officer (3 ) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Auditor-Controller Supervisors Administrator affixed this 28th day of August , 19 72 Juvenile Justice Comm. W. T. PAASCH, Clerk c/o Probation By iLz &I(— Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 —11972-- In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to initiation of certain program, Probation Department. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been requested by the County Probation Officer and recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that an appropriation of $10,000 be authorized to initiate a program of making emergency allowances available for food and shelter for certain persons placed on probation who are without funds or any immediate means of support; and As a condition precedent to implementation of this program the procedures and regulations to be established for the use of this fund are to be developed by the County Probation Department and approved by the County Administrator; and A report describing the results of the program is to be made by the Probation Department after six months of operation; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is o true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc . Probation officer Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this28thday of August 1972 Administrator W. L PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 19 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee pertain- ing to addition of Staff Nurse position, juvenile facilities . The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been indicated by the County Probation Officer that new juvenile facilities will be completed and placed into operation during the 1972-1973 fiscal year thereby placing greater demands for nursing services at this location; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that nursing services at the Juvenile Hall and the Childrens Shelter be improved by the addition of one Staff Nurse position effective October 1, 1972 to expand night nursing coverage at these juvenile facilities; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None. ABSENT : None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c. Probation officer (2) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of . Personnel Director Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this 28th day of August , 19 72 Administrator W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By / Deputy Clerk Loureve Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Recommendation ) of Administration and Finance ) Committee with respect to the ) August 28, 1972 Homemaker Program, Social Service ) Department. ) The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E . Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been indicated by the County Welfare Director that implementation of a Homemaker Program to replace the present system of attendant care home services has been mandated by the federal government; and A preliminary analysis of the proposed program reveals that due to the federal and state formulae for financing the delivery of home care services to Aid to Disabled cases it may be fiscally advantageous to the county to implement the Homemaker Program at an early date; and In view of the aforementioned reasons , it having been recom- mended by the Administration and Finance Committee that the program be approved in concept only and that county staff be directed to complete a comprehensive study of this matter and develop a plan for establishment of a Homemaker Program; and The details of the plan, including staffing and financing, are to be presented to the County Administrator for review and approval and subsequent submission to the Board of Supervisors for its approbation; and Only after approval by this Board of the detailed program is consideration to be given to authorization of additional staff and approval of the budget adjustments (subject to the understanding that no additional county funds are to be provided ) necessary to implement the Homemaker Program; On motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation of its Administration and Finance Committee is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A . Linscheid. NOES: None. ACERTIFIED COPY ABSENT: None . I certify that this Is a full, true & correct copy of the original document wlilch is on file in my office, c c: We if ar e Director (3) and that it 2s passed & adopted by the Board of Auditor-Controller Superri:.ors of Contra Costa County, California, on Administrator the date shown. ATTEST: W. T. PAASCEL county clerk&ex-officio clerk of said Board of supervisors, by deputy clerk. AUG 2 8 1972 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 197x„_ In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to plan for implementation of performance of medical eligibility. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been indicated that it is the intent of State legislation and the policy of this Board that the county maximize revenues from subventions and from billings for medical services performed by the county; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that in pursuit of this objective it is desirable and would be of benefit to the county that a plan be developed whereby patient liability and/or eligibility for public assistance for medical services provided at the County Hospital and the outpatient clinics is determined by staff assigned to the Social Service Department; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED and the Social Service Department is directed to submit to the County Administrator a plan for implementation of performance of medical eligibility for review and subsequent submittal to the Board of Supervisors for approval. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES : None. ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c . Welfare Director (2) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Medical Director Supervisors Health Officer affixed this 28th day of August , 1972 Auditor-Controller W. T. PAASCH, Clerk Administrator By / �l�Ger.<-�p , Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M i V ® ! In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 1972 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to foster home care rates . The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related-matters considered during its review of the budget; and It having been indicated that the proposed Budget includes supplemental funds to provide for an increase of $5 per month to certain rates paid to foster homes; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that the supplemental appropriation to finance the suggested increase be approved to enable adjustment of monthly foster parent payments to offset the effect of inflation upon the cost of care and to serve as an inducement to increase foster home placements; On motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED and county staff is directed to present a- schedule of foster home rates incorporating the proposed rate increase to the County Administrator for presentation to this Board for its considera- tion . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid . NOES : None. ABSENT: None . 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. c c: Welfare :Director (3 ) Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Probation Officer (2) Supervisors Administrator affixed this 28th day of August , ig 72 Auditor-Controller W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By 4 ' Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 1972 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to Educational Resources Information Center. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and The County Superintendent of Schools having requested that the county provide local financial assistance of $15,000 to support the Educational Resources Information Center for the 1972-1973 fiscal year; and It having been indicated that this program would broaden and improve the services of the Office of the County Superintendent of Schools by providing a computer oriented system for retrieval of educational literature and that the total cost of the program for the year is estimated as $81,163 with $66,163 to be obtained from other sources; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that county financial assistance not to exceed $15,000 be provided for the 1972-1973 fiscal year with the understanding that said assistance is a one-time only grant to enable the system to become operational and to allow sufficient time for development of a user charge so that the Center may become financially self- sustaining; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None . 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Superintendent of Schools Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrator Supervisors Audi tor-Controller affixed this 28th day of August , 19 72 W. PAASCH, Clerk Byr CLC dL Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 , 1972 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to allocation for County Library. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and The County Librarian having advised the committee that the proposed program for public multi-media services, including films, tapes , cassettes and sound films , has been modified to reflect a cooperative agreement with the County Superintendent of Schools for film storage , maintenance and joint use of materials; and Services provided under the agreement will eliminate costly duplication of equipment and personnel by the County Library thereby reducing the budget requested for this program to $18,000; and There being an increasing demand by the public to make available for circulation film and sound recordings to augment written materials ; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that the requested budget appropriation of $18,000 for the 1972-1973 fiscal year to supplement multi-media materials circulated by the County Library be authorized; On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Librarian Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Auditor-Controller Supervisors Administrator affixed this 28th day of August , 1972 1 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By ZL Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-15M In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 28 19 72 In the Matter of Recommendation of Administration and Finance Committee with respect to appropriation for a basic book catalog, County Library. The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal ,year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and The County Librarian having advised the committee of the necessity to provide an appropriation of $25,000 in the 1972-1973 fiscal year for the printing of a new basic book catalog to incorporate new book acquisitions; and The printing of the new basic book catalog is essential for public convenience and to permit the full and rapid utilization of this document to enable the public to enjoy the full use of printed materials; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that the requested $25,000 appropriation for the printing of the new basic book catalog which is included in the proposed budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year be authorized; On motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendation is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid . NOES: None . ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: Librarian Supervisors Auditor. -Controller affixed this 28th day of August 19 72 Administrator —" W. L PAASCH, Clerk By. dLtt& tac Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-ISM IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Recommendation of ) Administration and Finance Committee ) with respect to part-time secretary ) for the Contra Costa County ) August 28, 1972 Recreation and Natural Resources ) Commission . ) The Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) having presented a report dated August 28, 1972 on the proposed County Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year incorporating therein certain recommendations with respect to policy items and other related matters considered during its review of the budget; and The Chairman of the Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission having proposed that a part-time executive secretary be employed to provide additional staff services for the Commission; and Recreation, open space, parks and matters affecting the envi- ronment are demanding increasing attention of this Board as they are of great importance and concern to the public; and It having been recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee that an appropriation of $3,000 be provided in the budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year to employ a part-time executive secretary effective November 1, 1972 to assist the Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission; and A general discussion by the Board as to the need for this part- time position and the method to be used for selection and employment of the individual to perform this function followed; On motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendation of the Administration and Finance Committee is APPROVED with the understanding that the continuing need for a part-time executive secretary position for the Commission shall be reviewed prior to adoption of the 1973- 1974 fiscal year budget . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess . NOES: Supervisor E. A. Linscheid. ABSENT: None . CERTIFIED copy 1 certify that this is a full, true & correct copy or the original document �Which is on file in my office cc: Commission c/o Administrator and that it . :a :,;ICQpj •- •3.'� r•1, b%, the Board o Supervisor: �}; �' �* '. California, o Administrator -�- ntv, the date snot,•;.. ci' F:;ASC"rI count Personnel Director clerk&ex-of`icio clerl:c:'sai.�Livard of Supervisors. Personnel Director by d puty clerk. �'�,fiLCh7G?.Gc y - on THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Administration Building ell Martinez, California RECET August 28, 1972 T. P A A S C H CLER SOA OF SUPERVISORS O COST BY r%.- REPORT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE C010ITTEE ON 1972-1973 PROPOSED BUDGET Upon receipt of the Budget Message of the County Administrator, the Board of Supervisors approved it as the basis of issuance of the Proposed Budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year and referred it to the Administration and Finance Committee for review and recommendation. The County Administrator indicated that although a number of uncertainties existed at the time of preparation of the Budget Message, unless potential favorable situations developed a county tax rate increase of about $0.15 might be required. The Administration and Finance Committee approached the task of budgetw-review with the objective of reducing the budget wherever possib a as it is very clear that the taxpayers of acounty are iMneed of property tax relief and should not be subjected to another tax rate increase. With this underlW—n—tlsstrative hiloophy, the camittee met Frith department heads and staff for many long and arduous hours in study sessions to evaluate work programs and to determine the fiscal requirements for financing county services. The information below indicates in summary form the recosmen- dations of this committee with respect to the county budget for the 1972-1973 fiscal year: 1. A budget in the total amount of $1669292,660 is- recommended; this is a reduction of IM'5 032,797 from the Proposed Budget total of .3,25,457 and is $7 534,020 more than the budget for the 1971-19/2 fiscal year. 2. 2. The county tax rate necessary to finance the recommended budget will be $2.834 throughout the county (except within the City of chmond) which is a reduction of 37 cents from the tax rate of $3.204 inM TM-Mrfisaal year. Inside the City of Richmond the county tax rate will be $2.662 (eaacludes County Library Fuad requirement of $0.172), which is a reduction of 36.4 dents from the 1971-1972 fi year. The following comments provide a brief explanation of the budget revisions made by the committee in order to arrive at the above recommendation: 1. It is recommended that only 79 full-time permanent, five permanent part-time (full-time equivalent of 2 and lb/40) and one rmanent-intermittent PO sitions be authorized ee attached schedule); this is a reduction of 110 positions from the 195 included in the Proposedet which in turn had been pared down by tMounty Adminis- trator from the 880 positions requested departments. It is pointed out that of total positions requested 18 are to staff the new Juvenile Hall Addition upon its letion this fall, 14 are to be assigned to pro acts or programs the cost of which is reimbnr by the state or federal governments, 11 replace tevpovary positions which have developedE full time assignments and are offset by tions in appropriations for temporary ses five are for persons working in the PubWIOYment Program who will be transitioned to penument positions, and one replaces a service previously provided under contract. The positions are necessary to cope with work load increasQa and to maintain an adequate level of county service. It is specifically pointed out that the 50 additional positions for the Social Service Department and four positions for the Probation Department have been deleted. The used for these positions is determined b1 application of certain work load standards applied to projected case loads. 3. These positions have been eliminated on the basis that case loads are not increasing at the rates previously experienced and the =amber of positions requested may not be needed. It is reca®ended that the County Administrator review the staffing of these departments after six months of operation in the 1972-1973 fiscal year (January 1, 1973) and report his findings to the Hoard. Certain programs are being receded for implementation in the 1972-1973 fiscal year. The personnel for these ppro�grams are not included in the position schedule pending development of the operating plan, organization and staffing needs which are to be subsequently reviewed. 2. One of the reasons for the decrease in the county property tax rate is the concerted attention devoted to increasing revenues s wherever possible, thereby reducing the amounts which must be raised by property taxes. Substantial gains have been realized by the transfer of certain cases and program costs from the County Hospital, where they have been fully financed by county property taxes, over to Social ServiceDepartsiant programs where the local cost is 25 per cent. Attention is being given to. carefulscreening for eligibility, billing and collection for patient services delivered at the County Hospital and the outpatient clinics. It is reeoorsentied that these efforts be aoantinnad and that the County Administrator review with county departments the chargges being - -a- services provided to detexmine if the zuctures should be modified to reflect current costs in order Haat those directly benefiting pay an appropriate amount and that county revenues be maximized. 4. 3. A number of revisions are recommended to the Plant Acquisition appropriations in order to provide finds for certain priority projects; These additional requirements have been offset largely by reductions to other appropriations or deferral of projects, Of major significance, however is the elimination of 5,000,000 approprated from the Accumulative Capital Outlay Mme for construction of the neer jail. It is t that the time required to conduct liehearings an this project following receippt of the report from the Bay Aspera Social Plarm ng envy and the completion of plans incorporat_ Whatever program modifications which may be determined as desirable will delay the advertising of this project. Further, funds from some deferred financing plan will be required toy part of the cost of the project. Therefore, it i9 recommended that the funds for construction not be appropriated but remain in the Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund and that the Board continue to levy the ten cent tax for this fund. An appropriation of only $200,000 is ' --dad to ou cover further design and miscellanes costs as may be necessary. 4. The budget for welfare was reviewed -to determine if reduction of appropriations included in the Proposed Budget could be modified. _ The most recent infozmation available as to the case load in the various categorical assistance programs and laws and regulations promulgated we analyzed thereby permitting further budget reductions. Also taken Into consideration were the programs modifications transferring certain programs to the welfare budget to increase revenues as indicated in item 2 above. The net result of this review is to decrease the gross budget requirement for public welfare included in the Proposed Budget by $5139326 to a total of $79,321,392. This totalddgget is $1 138,280 more than the b��dget provided in the 1931-1972 fiscal year which is a very awdest increase in son to recent years. The net county financ participation in welfare (cate- gorical assistance programs mad administration) included in the re ad Midget is $1790039516, 0 5. a decrease of $196929870 from the 1971-1972 fiscal year. Although applications for assistance continue to increase, the rate of increase has lessened substantially due to the improvement in the economy and the effect of welfare reform legislation enacted in 1971. 5. Another area of recommended major a which is worthy of special mention is the et for the County Medical Services which has reduced by a net amount of 4,5291,350; some of these appropriations have transferred to Social Service for claiming purposes while others are direct budget reductions such as for the closing of a ward; these reductions are discussed in more detail in the appropriation schedule attached. Another significant item is the result being shown from the more intensive eligibility screening and billing procedures initiated with the advent of Medi-Cal reform. Based upon the latest statistical data, a net increase of ;w ✓�'�`'e ° $958,753 over the amount included in the Proposed Budget is projected, which reduces the amount of local property tax dollars required to sustain county medical services. Our committee considered all policy matters identified in the Budget Message, evaluating the benefits to be obtained against the cost involved. In order to restrict the length of this report only those policy items being recomended are discussed below: �1. It is recommended that $3,000 be provided to increase the clothing allowance for members of the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Reserves . from $50 per year to $75 per year to recognize in a small way the valuable services provided by these men for the common ty. Provision of $11,325 is made to intensify the delinquency preventionrogram in order to coordinate efforts at the county and couomtmity level with special emphasis on drug abuse pro- grams. The budget ap ropriation will provide for one Deputy Probation Officer and cooca d tont expenses, • 0 6. 3. An appropriation of $101,000 is recommended to initiate a programa of mekin allowances available for emergency food and shelter for certain persons placed on probation vho are without funds or aasapp immediate means of support; implemention of this gram is subject to approval by the ty Administrator of the procedures and regulations to be established for the use of these funds and a: report describing the results of the program to be made to the Hoard of Supervisors after six months of operation. 4. It is recommended that nursing service be ewnmided by the addition of one Staff Nurse effective October 19 1972 so that night coverage can be maintained at Jirnanin Ia Hall and the Childress Shelter. With a dole% Lon of facilities at the juvenile complex and the increasing number of children to be housed the need for additional nursing services will become even more acute. 5. In view of the federal mandate for implemen- tation of a Homemaker Program and because the cost to the camty, for conducting this program is fully reimbursed by state and federal funds, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the pr;EL:t!TC0�WS`00"rf t and direct county staff to develestablishment of this service. the plan are to be presented to the County A&dnistrator for review and approval with the required financial adjustments to be made during the fiscal year by the Board. No additional budget appropriation is required at this time. 6. It is recommended that eligibility determination for medical services at the County Hospital and outpatient clinics be assigned to the Social Service Department in order that reimburse- ment may be obtained for the cost of the positions required to adequately perform this function . An anticipated benefit to be derived iron this arrangement is the additional reveam to be 7. obtained a U',e's'tL=df :L"t3f' ibill, �o this unit and the subventions to be derived are included in the total Social Service Department adjustment with the details to be developed after further staff study. ` 7. A proposed increase of $5 per month for foster home care to offset the continued advance in the cost of living is covered in the appropriations included in theProposed Budget; it is led that the Hoard approve the rate increase. No budget adjustment is necessary for this item. 8. The County Superintendent of Schools has requested that the county provide $15,000 to support the Educational Resources Information Center for the 1972.1973 fiscal year; the total cost of this program for the year is estimated as $819163 with f of $669163 to be obtained from other source. Lomputer retrieval of educational literature enables the office to broaden its service to school districts, county staff and community organizat3 ons. County financial assistance of $15,000 is wecammended with the unders that this grant is for enab one year onl to ie the system to became fully operational and to allow time for the development of a user charga so that the Center My become financially self-sustaining. • 9. The re steel program for multi-media services including films, tapes, cassettes and sound films has been modified to reflect a proposed cooperative arrangement with theDepart. ment of Education for film stor�e�tenance and joint use of materials. Such an arrangement will eliminate costly duplication of equipeuent and personnel by the County Librasy0 As a result of this program age the requested budget has been reduced to $118 000. Approval of the program on this basis is in that there is an increasing demand by the public for multi-media materials. • 8. 10. The proposed printing of a basic book catalog to incorporate new book acquisitions is necessary for the full and rapid utilization of this document. The cost of the printing will be shared with Alameda County resulting in a $25,000 cost to the county. It is reCA3MMeMded that this printing be apprated; no additional funds are necessary as the necessary appropriation for this item is included in the budget. 11. The policy matter regardim the Aid to Cities pprogram has been determined dpreviously by the Board• no adjustment of this item is necessary as the $500,000 appropriation for the program was Included in the Proposed Budget. 12. The policy matter that the county contribute $10,000 toward the local matching funds rs red for development of a trail system was re apprnved the Board; no adjustment is necessary as a $10,0 appropriation for this item is included in the budget. 13. Parks, recreation facilities, open space and matters affecti�- the environment are important to the public =a of concern to this Hoard. In order to give these matters greater attention at the county level, it is recommended that a part-time Executive Secretary be employed effective November 1 1972 to assist the Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural �s Commission. As canreadil be seen from the caoments and reca®usadations incorporated in this report, the Administration and Finance Committee gavevery careful attention to the budget in order to lower the tax rate and yet to provide a program of public service which is acceptable and meets the needs of our citizens. It is suggested that the Board of Supervisor pt the recaamendations incorporated in this report. f WO No BUGM53 Supervisor District 3 Supervisor District 4 TABLE I ADDITIONAL POSITIONS RECOMMENDED 1972-73 Fiscal Year Budget Unit Department Number Classification Date 002 Clerk of the 1 Intermediate 10-1-72 Boarld Stena Clbrk' Oil Data Processing 1 Key Punch 10-1-72 Operator 1 Data Processing 10-1-72 Equipment Operator 11 016 County Assessor 1 Senior Appraiser 10-1-72 030 , County Counsel 1 Deputy County 11-1-72 Counsel I 035 Civil Service 1 Safety Services 10-1-72 Commission Coordinator 1 Permanent Inter- 10-1-72 mittent Intermediate Typist Clerk . 055 Radio Facilities 1 Senior 10-1-72 Communication Technician 065 Martinez 2 Custodian 1-1-73 Administration Buildings 210 Mt. Diablo 1 Deputy Clerk I 10-1-72 Municipal Court 1 . Deputy Clerk I 1-1-73 213 West Municipal 1 Deputy Clerk I 10-1-72 Court 215 River Municipal I Deputy Clerk I 10-1-72 Court 20,140 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS RECOfrMHDED 1972-73 Fiscal Year (continued) Budget Unit Department Number Classification Date 240 County Clerk 1 Legal Clerk • 10-1-72 _ I Intermediate 10-1-72 Typist Clerk 1 Typist Clerk 10-1-72 242 District Attorney 2 Deputy District 11-1-72 Attorney I 1 Investigator 10-1-72 2 Typist Clerk 10-1-72 243 Public Defender 1 Deputy Public 11-1-72 Defender I 1 Pub i.ic Defender. 12-1-72 Investigator 1 Typist Clerk 11-1 -72 255 Sheriff 2 Sergeant 10-1--72 1 Deputy Sheriff 10-1-72 1 Sheriff's 1-1-73 Services Assistant 256 Sheriff' s 2 Sheriff's 10-1-72 Communications Dispatcher 300 County Jail 2 Sergeant 10-1-72 1 Lead Cook 10-1-72 3. Sheriff's 9-1-72 Services Assistant 2 Deputy Sheriff 10-1-72 308 Probation 2 Probation 10-1-72 Suoervisor I 1 I r abati on 30-1-72 Supervisor II Deputy Probation 10-1-72 Officer 6 `.'ypist Clerk 10-1-72 TABLE I ADDITIONAL POSITIONS RECOtiMENDED 1572-73 Fiscal Year (continued) Budget - Unit_ Department Number Classification Date 313 Boys Ranch - Group 10-1-72 Byron Counsellor I 1 Group ' 10-r1-72 Counsellor I 16/40 314 Juvenile Hall 1 Staff Nurse 10-1-72 14 Group 10-1-72 Counsellor II 2 Intermediate 10-1-72 Typist Clerk 2 Custodian 10-1-72 324 Special Super- 1 Deputy Probation 10-1--72 visitor, W"tern oAicsr Juvenile I Typist Clerk 1.0--1-72 325 Central Juvenile 5 Deputy Probation . 10-1-72 Intensive Super- Officer vision Unit 355 Recorder 1 Intermediate 10-1-72 Typist Clerk 357 Planning 1 planner I 10-1-72 Commission 450 Health 1 Public Health 10-1-72 Department Nurse 20/40 1 Out-of-Home Care 10-1-72 Nursing Supervisor 620 County Library 1 Librarian 1 10-1-72 1 Library 10-1-72 Specialist 1 Library 10-1-72 Assistant I 20/40 1 Library Clerk 10-1-72 20/40 TOTAL 85 TABLE II BUDGET REVISIONS RFCO:*L NDL:D AYPROPRIArIONS 1972-73 Fiscal Year Increase Decrease 1. Various Departments (General Fund) Permanent Salaries $1,620;293 $. Social Sectirity ' 8,562 Health Insurance 115# 369 ReLirement Contribui:ions 5G78742 Reservu for Contingaixies 1,176,482 County Library (Library Fund) Permanent Salaries 75,402 Social Sccurity 29,003 Health Insurance 48322 Ret.`.rement Contributions 15,950 Reserve for Contingencies 65,777 Various Departments (General Fund) Uniform T,llowance 20,765 Reserve for Contingencies 200765 2. Social Service (Categorical. Aids) a. hid to Families With Dependent Children 627,500. b. Aid to Families With Dependent Children-Boarding _'saes & :institution:; 600,000 c. General ?relief 5,700 Social Servicc (Administration) 708,394 Mot Decrease - $513,326) 3. Roads a. AW to Cities 3104313 b. Minor Road Constructio;l- LtMnada Lane 35,000 4. Animal Control Overtime 311300 5 . Civil Se wicc: a. Over ti.nn 1 ,635 b. Ono PorL•ablo Copy Nac h : Ms:: 480 ® i TABLE II BUDGET Ri'V SIC.'I:S RECOI'.:iENDED APPROPIUATIONO`.j 1972-73 Fiscal Year (continued) Increase Decrease 6. Assessor Rent of Equipment $ 1,,1:25 $ 7. Treasurer-Tax Collector a. Temporary Salaries 1, 280 b. Office Expense 2,900 8. Retirement Administration a. Office Expense 10000 b. Professional & Personal Services 7,600 Auditor-Controller Cost Applied (600) 9. Office of Economic Opportunity a. Canpership Program (004-2310) 12,000 b. Audit Program 4, 500 10. County Counsel a. Memberships 270 b. Specialized Printing 1,000 11. Richmond Municipal Court Office Expense 600 12. Equipment Operation Automotive Equipment 41,740 13. Provision for Reserves Revolving Fund-County Service Area 85,000 14. Plant Acquisition Branch Jail Security Improvements 21,650 County Hospital-Ins tall Fire Sprinklers 1500,000 Finance Building-Alterations for Tax Collector 240550 TABLE Il BUDGET REVISIONS RECO 11ENDED APPROPRIATIONS 1972--73 Fiscal Year (continued) Increase Decrease 14. Plant Acquisition (continued) Finance -Building-Remodel Second Floor $ $ 650000 Veterans Memorial Building- Temporary Court Facility 160600 Civic Center Land Acquisition 501000 Garage-Relocate Gas Pumps 30,000 Veterans Memorial Building-- Lafayette Assessment, District Improvement 5,910 Parking Lot 26,200 Construct Jail 50000000(1) Provision for Reserve Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund 18772,000(1) 15. a. County Hospital Various Accounts 4000000 b. County Hospital Various ,Accounts 4008000. Special Fiscal Services Professional Services 1508000 c. County Hospital Professional Services 140400 Cost Applied 2008000 d. Hospitals-Mentally Ill and Retarded Professional & Personal Services 539,550 16. Land Use and Transportation Study Project Components (carry-over) 20,000 17. Special Fiscal Services Professional Services 401000 (1) Accumulative Capital Outlays Furl • TABLE I1 BUDGET REVISIONS RECOMMENDED APPROPRIATIONS 1972-73 Fiscal Year (continued) Increase Decrease 18. Airport Subsidy Enterprise Fund Aid $ 62', x.13 ? 19. County Hospital Office Equipment 450 20. Various Departments Labor Provided (74,114) Cost Applied (160,169) Professional Services 340000 21. Various Departments New Permanent Salaries Requirements 3,937(1) 443,419 Fixed Assets-New Positions 34,415 Temporary Salaries 86,650 22. Provisions for Reserves Reserves for Inventories 691596 23. Game Protection Special Departmental Expense 44,382 24. County Administrator Public Information Program 101000 25. Sheriff Increased Clothing Allowance for Reserves 31000 26. Probation Department Delinquency Prevention Program 110325 Board and Care for Probationers 10,000 27. Superintenden4 of Schools Grant Financial Assistance to Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) 15,000 (1) Library Fund 7#1246 TABLE I1 BUDGET REVISIONS RECOMMENDED APPROPRIATIONS 1972-73 Fiscal Year (continued) Increase Decrease 28. County Library Provide Multi-Media Materials $ 18+000(1) $ 29. Park Administration Employ Part-Time Execrative Secretary to Commission 3,000 Grand Total $ 503709003 $100402,800 Net Decrease 58032,797 PROOF TOTAL $1084020800 $1084028800 Fund Detail General Fund — $1,985,752 Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund-Decrease 3,228,000 Revolving County Service Area Fund 85,000 Fish and Game Fund 4,382 Library Fund 21,977 Provision for Inventories 69,596 Net Decrease $5,032,797 (1) Library Fund #1206 TABLE III REVENUE REVISIONS 1972-73 Fiscal Year Increase Decrease 1. Social Service -- Categorical Aids a. Federal Aid for Children $ $ 2760153 State Aid for Children 171,968 b. Federal Aid for Children 50,068 State Aid for Children 521F571 c. Federal Aid for Disabled 208236 d. Federal Welfare Administration 486,548 State Welfare Administration 220,269 (Net Decrease - $304,717) 2. Sale of Real Property (Item 3b) 75,000 3. Federal Aid - Economic Opportunity 108500 4. Library Services (7741) 20,000(1) S. Sale of Personal Property 8,850 6. Federal Welfare Administration 300000 7. County Hospital Medi-Cal (#7635) 10303,428 Medicare 55,090 Patient Payments-Mental Health 125,000 State Aid-Mental Health 329,585 (Net Increase - $958,753) $2,039,326 $1,195,940 Net Increase 843,386 $28039,326 $20039,326 (1) Library Fund (#1206) $ (20,000) General Fund (#1003) 863.386 Net Increase $ 843,386 � �E�vc� ot BGVUD OL�cfl'aElihtSO� y5 Y��' ♦�� � UJIP ;. r, .+� ,t �4 TC RES00NSI LE METROFROLE aN M7E dfSP�PERl u - .�-� H E3* - THURSD�►Y AUGUST g4, ,L � r - f� i Contra: � 3 , K_ a V S6 3 f. The Contra costa-Board of Supervisors is Over 1 �, �"'� �JW. to adop bu et-of about seeA c � $B�aP expected Monday t a _ n£ T 6c, F v. �'',�,�LI-63 million,:the largest spending pogram ui =3.2! EPS'�. r t � ; ab l Y 4 11J .h1StOry assessed 3 Su is are now seeking.-ways, to mole � � `3 .��p budget which stads ; � the II1 G1117��r�+a+�..J.: Qar�.S ]nllllon more than last y ° ` tsome _ - ,the budget: �irom � cult decisions on To�helP ttiem fn'the dtffi �,yQhere:to reduce spending,snperv>sorst faster r s `�` Lyellgive strong consideration to recommen 0 �� 7ations by th6-Contra--Costa -Taxpayers Asso s; Alemeda Go1Y' �- o �:'e k �° executive Vpi�ce:P{{r�esident W_ ilham P� x. �� E ; ( � ggested that $ -WWIiIC� l y_:..� 1✓ Y.f 4 k C. f.�'$p'fS�t.9 YY er.has •su . 1,859,872 canoe �-� -,.� y. �,- �„ ,�, �•r �hcedfrom-the budget an IA,program Tlie largest budget reductions:proposed ' Eby Baker would be-X50;000 at:the County }j' �' welfAnts.:•; sp anti: the Social Servile 35 9" in navy state slid federally aipndatgd P Bre -;silo itala sand Pepartment Baker,says .the':hospital is pig-ups . x $sid have p1 ,Pro ` _ mental AIOTB thal� W Share Of Cost ln:the X hick is funded on a match- u S t t health program w. eats of ta�c incie ; `y basis with_the state. .He eoAtends-the hgitile-for es, � Co„gtyres�dgnts caa ,y 2� pihdl is'accepting Patients sthte funding t s�QeYYlsors tQ trsr at a<'costi of- X50,000 to"local �u11Y a. . do, v�t1i what revenues are at hand. 'may ars - Bager recommends thatthe'Social S=iv Granted it is not easy to Bold the•Iute on �ce.Department not hire 5Q new'employes as h=while Iuroyidwg-the services.thaf conA- planned because-the actual number of we)• ty resents have come to expect.-But the fare;recipeats is showing a gradual decline - - board must sham ta':draw that line. erhaps by following,the Taxpayers As- _']PItis-all,weli a g to-demaWi ,JXOP sociation recommendations, supervisors maY t ta�refotm:at t}�e state level, 71 Liex�per►dof lie able to Mold a-better line on taxes than y resCoan also is needed at the local level the have in the.past: i�od de well to give sttot Since 1960 th budget to provide county � tathea�dv�ce othe Taaye ' e:bn government;services has>:quadiupTed:'irate "tiat"'they ``ems. miIllon�to.$159 million for the 2972tt . � fr E 1 R. r P + R Rf3�OM Iq + r ae, 41 Ift,"01,1111ft co" * ` �, 4 1 F 3`E >tjam Z;, swpeevi�iocs aoe``w s�Mi�..�s 4 sit' � X 5 law mWiOi! '!ue[e- tw Lit yew's •Ta-ls�i tYie iu'11r�irieilit>rci�iiwie an ����' �_, �'�� Ezidcetitre Vke,1rt P �, s..2 �by ip.i .;d=fit In Le isvti�ptai�ii .ii frwiei a a - 'wit tie sbte :He � Iq+ss�t > a=**patirts Tata k tae Tv; .. =at s oast of Iscal _ i►te!low. ._, now recommuft sift SO"S Dl�m mt vA kin Www moes as Geailed iir Slt w .:f�►IrY Mls4s�s = y idm De �c aet@4 sic Of Wwi. t r�r ilepn+rl �tl�taletlas:t�ltai i+e irests is:bogies a gra"decl e. Ove;aw 16ems. �1t tie'. Ferhsps by foiba `tie�'aers A:- =slrrd"Ia io* lMt: mciation rec�omirr�d t3rM, mt0r'. .' a/.wt�sill psi /ess be able to iaii a Moet.lfos at t=iss ur q.t tr1�a�at t wM�s: iii. Y 'mit is dit Vve M_ �w 'is areii at>Yb �M1Me: ..ta prwi�it pgsti � � M �iiE f� ` 1�■�iea fi�Vii!aiWr�tsc tbe'bllaIgiM !� M WN 0 �f OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF-CORONER CONTRA COSTA COUNTY WALTER F. YOUNG SHERIFF-CORONER REC 3 D P.O. BOX 991 / MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 Aug. 23, 1972 ::Z_ VISORS Deputy Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Martinez California 94553 Gentlemen: You received a letter and report analyzing the county budget as proposed for 1972/73 with recommendations from Mr. William P. Baker, Executive Vice President of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association. He comments and advocates budget changes for the Department of Sheriff-Coroner on pages two and three. We reply. Workload statistics do not reflect a significant decline during the past four years. There are some decreases in the area of felony crime occurrences, and there are major -increases in narcotic, dangerous drug, and vice-type violations. Continuing changes in law require greater investigative application for each case. A serious burglary problem still exists and requires a constant major effort by both patrol and investigative forces to effect even minimal control. The three Sergeants mentioned under "Sheriff's Office" are positions recommended by the County Administrator to pro- vide proper supervision of patrol officers (two) and to in- crease the Juvenile Investigator's forces (one). The span of control of Sergeants over patrol officers is too large. There are about twelve officers per Sergeant. With the addition of these positions the department plans to provide greater street patrol forces by adoption of the four-day, ten-hour schedule per week. The processing of juvenile investigations has become as complex as adult cases due to additional legal requirements. The additional Sergeant is needed. As to policy matter number 1: For many years we have informed the Board of areas where we believe it is desirable to provide higher levels of service. These recommendations .�1 Board of Supervisors - page 2 - Aug. 23, 1972 are based, in part, on improving the existing level of service and in planning to provide for future needs, e.g. , anticipated population growth with the operation of Bay Area Rapid Transit, etc. We fail to understand the reasoning behind the recommendation to deny the new permanent positions (2) for Communication dispatching. During the fiscal year 1971/72 the department expended $14,130.00 in temporary salaries for vacation and sick relief by utilization of permanent-intermittent personnel. With the deletion of these P. I. positions and authorization of two permanent positions, no temporary salaries will be expended. There is scant need to recount the problems of holding our jail system together. We currently have seven Sergeants in the Detention Division for two facilities. With 42 shifts per week to cover, seven will not have a Sergeant on duty. The coverage lessens when Sergeants are absent, on vacation, or sick leave. The branch jail at Marsh Creek requires constant supervision-, ,this place is an improvised structure required to provide maximum confinement, a difficult task. The department has requested an additional Lead Cook for many past years. Last fiscal year we experienced difficulty when inmate cooks went on strike. We need relief during the regular days off of our present two cooks. We can ask inmates to assist in kitchen work as long as we provide a regular cook to supervise, instruct, prepare menus, etc. When shifts are not covered, we often experience periods when no inmate with cooking ability is available. There are many reasons why the Detention operating costs are increasing: Examples, food costs for fiscal year 1971-72 - approximately $140,000.00, medical costs for last six months of year - almost $100,000.00. We are compelled to provide for inmates in accordance with State minimum standards. Costs are reflecting raising standards, inflation, court orders, and new needs. Very truly yours, WALTER F. YOUNG, Sheriff-Coroner .i ry D. ay, Unds rif HDR/hva Under CC: J. P. Mc Brien, County Administrator Contra Costa Taxpayers' Association CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Inter- Office Memo Date: Augus t 22, 1972 To: Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess ) From: Clerk of the Board Subject: The Board today referred to you for review recommendations of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association with respect to the proposed 1972-1973 County Budget. lk attachments to the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Augus t 22 , 19 72 In the Matter of Recommendation of Contra Costa Taxpayers Association with respect to proposed 1972-1973 County Budget. Mr. William P. Baker , Executive Vice President, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, having transmitted to the Board the associations detailed analysis of the proposed county budget for fiscal year 1972- 1973 (including a summary of recommended reductions ) ; and On motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias , seconded by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, IT IS BY =E BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid material is REFERRED to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor Moriarty and Supervisor W. N. Boggess) for consideration in conjunction with its review of the budget. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias , J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Taxpayers Assn. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Board Committee Supervisors Administrator affixed this 22nd day of August , 1972 - W. T. PAASCH, Clerk 8y Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 7/72-ISM �" • • A CONTRA COSTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION P.O.BOX 27 / 820 MAIN STREET / MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553 / PHONE 228-5610 August 18, 1972 Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Gentlemen: Attached is the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association's detailed "Analysis of the County Budget by Department." We are providing this "outside view" of the proposed 1972-73 County Budget at the beginning of your hearings in hopes that it will serve as a resource to you in making the delicate decisions weighing proposed need for increased public services against the need for property tax relief. Included in our analysis are specific requests for reducing the Budget by $1,859,872. While these recommendations are specific, including the reasoning behind our decisions, they should by no means be considered as all-inclusive. During your deliberations, you will notice that this year's "buzzword" is intensify service. When you see this term used as a rationale for increasing staff and operating expenses, please think to yourselves, "cut, squeeze and trim." We would like to take this opportunity to thank the County Administrator, Mr. J. P. McBrien, and his staff for their cooperation in answering our questions during the long task of reviewing the proposed Budget. Our office stands ready to assist you in any way possible during your ten days of difficult Budget decision. Please feel free to call on us for further assistance. Sincerely, William P. Baker REQ EIVED Executive Vice President WPB:mc �oC•l� 7�_ Enclosure T. P A A S C H CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS _ NTRA C j A CO. By puty BUDGET UNIT COMPARISONS Budgeted Requested Budget Unit 1971-72 1972-73 Increase or Decrease General and Administrative $ 1295959280 $ 1896829017 $ 690869737 + 48 % Public Protection 22,105,873 24,663,570 2,5579697 + 12 % Health & Sanitation 398529857 49378,349 5259492 + 14 % Public Assistance 103,449,313 10791729741 39723,428 + 4 % Education 3,364,082 39462,453 98,371 + 3 % Roads 91539,311 898429750 - 6961561 - 7 % Recreation 28,290 52,339 24,049 + 85 % Debt Service 541,876 531,238 - 10,639 - 2 % Airport Subsidy 58,949 -- - 58,949 - 100 % Reserves 11631,194 3,540,000 19908,806 + 117 % Totals $157,167,025 $171,325,457 $ 14,1589432 + 9 % Provision for Reserves 1,591,615 -- - 19591,615 - 100 % TOTAL BUDGET REQUIREMENTS $158,758,640 $171,325,457 $ 129566,817 + 8 % . OUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED REDUCTI* No. Positions Amount Total Amount Reduced Reduced Reduced/Added r PUBLIC DEFENDER Salaries d Wages - 1 -$ 6,000 Fixed Assets - 300 -$ 6,300 SHERIFF'S OFFICE Salaries d Wages 0 +$ 12966 SHERIFF'S COMMUNICATIONS Salaries & Wages - 1 -0- COUNTY JAIL Salaries d Wages - 3 -$ 26s017 Services d Supplies - 1009000 Fixed Assets - 6,000 -$ 132,017 PROBATION Salaries & Wages -18 -$1119819 Services d Supplies - 89000 Fixed Assets - 5,000 -$ 124,819 JUVENILE HALL Salaries & Wages -16 -$ 84,800 Schools & Hospital Chgs. - 30,000 Household Expense - 5,000 Grounds Maintenance - 3,000 -$ 1229800 GIRLS RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER Salaries & Wages - 6 -$ 89520 Household Expense - 16,500 County Equipment - 3,782 -$ 28,802 SAFETY COUNCIL Contribution -$ 61975 ANIMAL CONTROL Services d Supplies -$ 16,839 HEALTH DEPARTMENT Services & Supplies -$ 16,177 Fixed Assets - 2,065 -$ 18,242 SOCIAL SERVICE Salaries d Wages -50 -$422,696 Services & Supplies - 880700 Fixed Assets - 24,540 -$ 535,936 AID TO NEEDY CHILDREN BOARDING HOMES & INSTITUTIONS -$ 42,900 GENERAL RELIEF Services & Supplies -$ 157,296 COUNTY LIBRARY Salaries d Wages - 4 -$ 189912 COUNTY HOSPITAL 650,000 TOTALS -99 -$1,8599872 ANALYSIS OF COUNTY BUDGET BY DEPARTMENT COUNTY COUNSEL An increase of $27,310 in the operating budget reflects 1 new Deputy County Counsel I position and the first full year costs of the 2 new positions hired in 1971-72. A further request for 2 additional Deputy County Counsel I. based on re- quests from local school districts, is not funded in the proposed budget. Recommendation: Approve as budgeted. Until the impact of the 1 additional Counsel and the 2 Counsels added in 1971-72 is measured, the request for 2 additional Counsels for school district legal work should be denied. PUBLIC DEFENDER The Public Defender's office's vociferous appetite for public funds was not curbed by the additional 8 positions granted in 1971-72, as this unit has again re- quested a 50% increase in staff positions. As crime rates continue to rise steadily nationwide, the area which dominates the local caseload is misdemeanor applications. Actual d Actual Estimated Projected Activity 1970-1971 1971-1972 1972-1973 Felony applications 19614 1,625 12787 Misdemeanor applications 4,277 59054 5,559 Juvenile applications 1,453 1,173 1,291 Conservatorships ? 541 596 Other applications ? 632 695 Total 8,070 9,025 9,928 Positions 36 42 49 While it is difficult to assess just how much legal and investigative talent should be applied to assure an indigent accused of an adequate defense, some limitation must be found to defend the taxpayer against staff increases in the magnitude of 30% over the past two years. Recommendation: Delete: 1 Investigator Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$ 6,000 Fixed Assets 300 Total Reductions -$ 6,300 Because the misdemeanor area was the only activity showing a marked increase between 1970-71 and 1971-72, the priority appears to be in trial attorneys rather than investigators. We recommend the deletion of one investigator position from the 1972- 73 budget. We further recommend that the request to involve the Public Defender's office in pre and post-trial stages of a case in the form of establishing a Rehabilitation and Resources Specialist would duplicate in part the probation office and should be denied. -1- • SHERIFF'S OFFICE Workload statistics indicate a leveling off over the past four years in most major activities including arrests, detective investigations, juvenile cases and warrants processed. The two areas showing marked increases are complaints reported to patrol and transportation. To alleviate this workload the budget contains requests for 3 Sergeants, one Deputy Sheriff for special services, and one Sheriff's Services Assistant for transportation. In addition, under Policy Matter No. 1, the Sheriff is requesting 17 additional positions at a partial year cost of $167,221 to intensify services. Recommendation: Delete: 3 Sergeants Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$ 28,044 Add: 3 Deputy Sheriffs (patrol) Add: Salaries and Wages + 30.000 Total +$ 1,966 The increased positions in the budget reflect an emphasis on supervision rather than an increase or intensification of patrol to handle the mounting number of public complaints. The growth in the ratio of complaints to arrests indicates the super- ficiality of many complaints, however an additional 3 Deputy Sheriffs on patrol will better meet the increasing need in this public service area. Policy Matter No. 1 The addition of 17 positions not covered in the budget is requested by the Sheriff "to intensify services." Neither the workload statistics nor population growth support an increase of this magnitude in the level of service. SHERIFF'S COMMUNICATIONS The budget contains a shift from 3 permanent-intermittent to 2 permanent Dispatcher positions with a partial year break-even point achieved. We recommend the creation of only one permanent position and the retention of an equivalency of permanent-intermittent positions for the following reasons. 1. Heavy periods of telephone calls (the major workload increase) can be estimated in advance but would not conveniently fill an eight hour shift. 2. To allow for vacation and sick leave substitution, permanent-intermittent positions are a necessity. Recommendation: Delete: 1 Permanent Sheriff's Dispatcher $ -0- COUNTY JAIL The budget adds 4 new positions: 2 Sergeants for "around-the-clock" supervision at the branch jail (Rehabilitation Center). 1 Head Cook - preparation of meals on weekends and in absence of present Lead Cook. 1 Sheriff's Services Assistant - prisoner transportation. In addition, Services and Supplies are increased $155,751, a substantial 32% over the 1971-72 budget, and Fixed Assets jump from $2,175 to $11,315, a 420% increase. -2- i • COUNTY JAIL (Con't.) In 1971-72, seven positions were added to the County Jail budget to provide for the security of the 20-40 county jail prisoners housed at the Rehabilitation Center due to an overcrowding at the county jail. However, workload figures show that since 1969-70, the year before the transfer of prisoners to the Rehabilitation Center, maximum security prisoners have only increased from 168 to 175, and the budget estimates this to grow to only 185 through 1972-73. It would be excessive to add 2 Sergeants to the existing staff at the Rehabili- tation Center at this time. Jt is questionable how the inmates and staff could have survived on weekends with'a Lead Cook for to these many years, but faced with a tax increase, we're willing to continue one more year. The Services and Supplies and Fixed Assets requests must be further reduced, but detailed information is lacking to make precise recommendations. Below is the three year spending pattern: Budgeted Recommended 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 Services and Supplies $4581509 $494021 $650,072 Fixed Assets 40592 2,175 119,315 Recommendations: Delete: 2 Sergeants 1 Head Cook Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$ 26,017 Services and Supplies - 100,000 Fixed Assets - 6,000 Total Reductions -$132,017 Policy Matter The Sheriff has requested 6 additional positions not included in the budget for a partial year cost of $49,451 to "intensify services" at the two jail facilities. The number of prisoners has increased from 285 to 310, while staff has increased from 61 to a recommended 75. In the past year the average prisoner count has gone from 298 to 310, an increase of 4%, while bookings have virtually leveled off, 11,243 in 1970-71 to 11,500 in 1971-72 (+2%). Noting the increase of 8 positions granted in 1971-72, this request is not substantiated by workload data and should be denied. -3- PROBATION The budget recommends an increase of 19 positions in the Probation Department, from 203 1/5 to 222 1/5 (+9%). This is on top of a 12% increase (181 to 203 ) granted during 1971-72. Caseload figures are cloudy due to the transfer of 18 year olds and above from Juvenile Division to the Adult Division, but total caseload figures show a decrease of 2 cases, from 12,115 to 12,113, over the past year. Workload hours, a questionable statistic, showed a greater decrease, from 136,152 to 125,219. The 19 additional positions are therefore not based on workload increase, but rather on "guidelines" which justify this substantial increase in staff. These rigid guidelines of 20 investigations per Deputy per month and 80 juvenile or 130 adult cases under supervision can be compared to the welfare caseload requirements recently eliminated by the State of California. All positions requested have a delayed effective date and many (9) are justifed by the comment "anticipated workload increase." Recommendation: Delete: 18 Positions Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$111,819 Services and Supplies - 89000 Fixed Assets - 5,000 Total Reductions -$124,819 With the increase of 22� positions in 1971-72, workload data, mentioned above, does not justify a further increase in staff this year. The one new position of Typist Clerk for the consolidated Pittsburg office has not been eliminated by our recommendations. The recommended $13,000 decrease in Services and Supplies and Fixed Assets is an estimate of the amount of increase over the 1971-72 budget directly related to the new positions, and in the case of Fixed Assets represents extraordinary growth. Policy Matters No. 1 and No. 2 Not included in the budget is a request to "improve caseload standards" and to establish a training unit (50 positions at $317,796) and a request to add 2 Delin- quency Prevention Officers to provide "expert guidance to local community groups interested in initiating a delinquency program ..." ($16,566). Noting the 22 1/3 positions granted in 1971-72 and the nonexistent workload increase, there should remain in the Probation Department's budget flexibility for improved services without adding even one of the 52 additional positions requested. Policy Matters No. 1 and No. 2 should be denied. Policy Matter No. 3 Board and care for probationers without means of support should be within the realm of Social Services and not be allowed to expand into the Probation Department. The request for $15,000 to initiate the program should be denied. Policy Matter No. 4 Placing information on all active probation cases on Alameda County's Police Information Network appears to be "too much of a good thing." While it is important to have immediate access to information on criminals at large or probationers who have unlawfully violated terms of probation, placing information on all active probation cases appears to have little value and obligates the county to one more permanent project which would never be reviewed or evaluated. We recommend that this request of $8,800 be denied. -4- • JUVENILE HALL The budget requests a modest increase of $493,357, or 37%, over 1971-72, and an additional 31 positions, 46%, over 1971-72. These requests are made in the face of a decrease over the previous year in all three categories of workload statistics: Admissions (-9%); Child care days (-15%); and average daily population (-16%). The reason given for this increase, the opening of the new Boys Wing housing 40 juveniles, has merit, but the magnitude of this request is unconscionable. Even with this additional space, the population is not expected to reach the 1970-71 level by the end of 1972-73. Recommendations: We fail to see how the opening of one new Boys Wing can necessitate the addition of the following staff: 14 Group Counsellor II; 7 Group Counsellor I; 2 Custodians; 2 Intermediate Typist Clerks. In addition, 5 Group Counsellor II and one Group Counsellor I positions are being requested for a Girls Unit planned for May 1, 1973. It is difficult to judge the impact of a three months delay in the opening of the Girls Unit as population figures are not segregated by sex. We recommend: 1. Reduce the staffing of the new Boys Wing by 7 Group Counsellor II, 2 Group Counsellor I and one Clerk Typist. (-$53,000) 2. Delay the new Girls Unit until a more thorough review of population needs is made in the 1973-74 budget hearings. (Reduce 5 Group Counsellor II and one Group Counsellor I). (-$319800) Delete: 12 Group Counsellor II 3 Group Counsellor I 1 Clerk Typist Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$ 84,800 In addition, the schools and hospital increased charges appear to be high in relation to the relatively small increase in population at Juvenile Hall. Reduce: Schools and Hospital Charges - 30,000 Household - 59000 Grounds Maintenance - 3,000 Total Reductions -$122,800 Policy Matter Not included in the budget is a request for 11 additional personnel ($59,784) to improve staffing of the kitchen and storeroom area, to increase nursing services, and to provide increased staff for detention units. This request cannot be justified by the population figures. The 15 position staff increase recommended by this report should offer relief, if properly applied, to the detention units. -5- _1 • 0 GIRLS RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER The recommended budget for this center contains an increase of $58,586 and a staff increase of 6 (60% over 1971-72). These increases are predicated on the open- ing of a new Girls Unit May 1, 1973, rated for a capacity of 40 girls. Despite this estimate only an increase in population from 16 in 1971-72 to 18 is forecast for 1972-73. We are in doubt as to how this Girls Treatment Program, beginning May 1, 1973, and requiring 6 new Group Counsellors, ties in with the proposed Girls Unit in the Juvenile Hall budget, starting May 1, 1973, and also requiring 6 new Group Counsellors. Recommendation: Delay opening of this new unit until October 1973 to allow for a thorough staff- ing review during the 1973-74 budget hearings. If this budget is approved as sub- mitted, a one-to-one ratio of staff to average daily population will occur in May 1973. Delete: 6 Group Counsellor II Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$ 89520 Household Expense - 16,500 County Equipment - 3,782 Total Reductions -$289802 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Recommendation: Approve as budgeted. Policy Matters No. 1 and No. 2 The Department of Agriculture has requested, in addition to its $500,305 budget, authority to begin an environmental protection project adding one Biologist position ($11,360), and a consumer protection service involving 3 new positions ($19,980), and Fixed Assets and Equipment totaling $11,614. We recommend that before the Department of Agriculture intensify its undercover buying, industrial quality control and environmental protection programs, further consideration be given to the anticipated outcome of these endeavors in light of the relatively high cost of expanding such programs. SAFETY COUNCIL The contribution to the Eastbay Chapter of the National Safety Council was eliminated in 1970-71 and was not included in the budget for 1971-72. In light of the $5,675 budgeted to Item No. 158, County Safety Services for the continuation of an employee safety program (which includes driver training, develop- ment and dissemination of safety information, safety gear and equipment, poison oak prevention and safety conferences and contests), an additional contribution to another safety program would not be in the best interest of the citizens of Contra Costa County. Recommendation: Delete: Contribution to Safety Council -$61975 -6- ANIMAL CONTROL Recommendation: Reduce Services and Supplies -$16,839 lie question the necessity for "more comprehensive and timely computer generated dog identification reports" ($5,000) and feel that $11,839 for "higher operating costs due to price inflation and workload growth in several other accounts" is excessive, considering that salaries and wages increased $35,103 over 1971-72. Building repairs are budgeted at $22,100, and maintenance of transportation fleet is increased by $12,200. The increase of $79,551 and 2 new positions over 1971-72 should provide relief from the increased workload estimated for 1972-73. Policy Matter No. 1 The budget does not include a request for $37,299 and 3 positions to furnish special patrol coverage in areas experiencing "unusual animal control problems" and to "intensify animal services countywide due to population increases." We recommend that the budget of $659,673 and 44 positions be approved without inclusion of Policy Matter No. 1. Policy Matter No. 2 The County Agricultural Commission again requests 6 new positions to staff a permanent dog licensing crew and feels that such a crew will generate enough licensing fees to be self sufficient. We do not feel that either the population growth or the past increases in license fees (about 5% or $15,000 per year) support the contention that even the partial year cost of $44,438 could be defrayed by the addition of a permanent licensing crew. We recommend that this request be denied. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Recommendation: Approve as budgeted. Policy Matters No. 1 and No. 2 Not budgeted are requests to add an Executive Director and a Secretary with expenses ($23,460) and establish compensation for the Commission members attending meetings ($2,500). The Human Relations Commission was established in 1969 to advise the Board of Supervisors on matters pertaining to divergent groups in the community and "to foster peaceful relations in the interest of preserving public peace among citizens of dif- ferent races, religious, and national origins. The budget contains clerical services, supplies,and mileage reimbursenent to the Commissioners. The Commission was designed to present an exceptional and divergent outside view- point to the Board of Supervisors, and not to become a part of the structure of gov- ernment. If qualified and enthusiastic Commission members cannot be found without requiring compensation and separate staff, the Commission should be dissolved. -7- HEALTH DEPARTMENT The recommended budget for the Health Department contains an increase of $222,375 (87.) and 6 new positions. Services and Supplies are increased by $54,328 and include "first year county fin- ancial assistance" to the Bay Area Health Officers Association in the amount of $6,204, and an increase of $4,973 in membership fees to the Comprehensive Health Planning Association. Fixed Assets are increased $2,065 "for replacement of old worn-out equipment and new items to effectuate operating economies wherever possible ..."! Recommendation: Reduce: Services and Supplies -$ 16,177 Fixed Assets - 2,065 Total Reductions -$ 18,242 We recommend reductions of $11,177 for new and increased dues to outside assoc- iations and $5,000 for "greater volume of office expense"; and $2,065 in Fixed Assets "to effectuate operating economies . .. ." We would strongly recommend that the County Administrator report to the Board of Supervisors the amount of money buried in the budget for membership in associations. The inference, from the $24,204 found in the Health Department budget for association memberships, is that the total is significant. SOCIAL SERVICE' The Social Service budget provides us with a real paradox. While categorical aid, the amount of money given to recipients, is down $1,482,648 due to a leveling off and gradual decline in the number of recipients, the operating budget for Social Services is up $3,134,254. New positions being requested amount to 50. In order to justify additional personnel and operating expenses the department has resorted to the "caseload standards" approach whereby the number of employees are set by a rigid ratio of cases to employees. At the present time nearly 30% of all county workers are employed by the Social Service Department. Despite the leveling of the number of recipients, the budget refers to caseload growth. We feel that the staff should be flexible enough to shift from an area of categorical aid to another, based on the demand for services, without continually requesting additional staff. Recommendations: Delete: 50 positions Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$422,696 Services and Supplies - 88,700 Fixed Assets - 24,540 Total Reductions -$535,936 In June, the Board of Supervisors approved 70 new positions, mainly in the eligibility (intake) area subject to the approval of the Board's Administration and Finance Committee. The Taxpayers Association recommended in a letter to this Committee, after its hearing on July 21, 1972, that only 36 of the 70 requested positions be filled at that time, and that the impact of these new positions be measured before the ba-ante is considered later in 1972-73. At the time of this analysis no positions have been filled. As a result no salaries have been expended during July and August, yet a full year's salaries for 70 positions have been included in the budget. In hopes that only 36 positions will be authorized and filled some time this fall and the rest be con- sidered later in 1972-73, we recommend a $200,000 reduction in the $484,164 budgeted for these 70 positions. -8- SOCIAL SERVICE (Con't.)* In addition, we recommend no additional positions be granted to the Social Service Department above the 70 mentioned previously, and that $222,696 included in the budget for 50 additional positions be deleted. We further recommend that Services and Supplies be reduced by $73,000 (Office Expense augmented "as a result of increased wv rk load"), and by $3,100 for auto mileage and $12,000 for office space to support the 50 proposed new positions. Fixed Assets should be reduced by $24,540 -- office furniture and equipment for the additional 50 positions. AID TO NEEDY CHILDREN - BOARDING HOMES AND INSTITUTIONS The budget for Boarding Homes and Institutions includes a $427,896 increase over 1971-72 (21%). Included in this figure is an increase of $42,900 for Foster Home Rates. The State of California, in the latest of its statistical series, "Public Welfare in California," May 1972, lists expenditures for dependent children in Boarding Homes and Institutions of all counties. Contra Costa is ranked the third highest in the state with an average payment per month of $211.19. The statewide average of all counties for the same period, the quarter ending March 1972, was $171.67. Recommendation: Reduce: -$42,900 As Contra Costa County pays $39.52 more per child per month than the statewide average, a rate increase is not warranted at this time. GENERAL RELIEF This totally county-funded welfare program is intended to aid the destitute "not eligible for any other category of assistance." The budget recommends a $412,980 increase, or 21%, over 1971-72. However, the narrative states that "The recommended appropriation is based on the assumption that economic activity within the county will improve slightly during the 1972-73 fiscal year." The State of California's Statistical Series PA 3, "Public Welfare in California," lists Contra Costa's total expenditure for General Relief: December 1971 $ 136,401 January 1972 163,887 February 1972 152,196 March 1972 148,135 April 1972 146,169 May 1972 147,795 Budgeted per month for 1972-73 162,205 We are in effect budgeting at the level of the highest month times twelve. An average of the 6 months ($149,097) yields an annual budget need of $1,789,164. In addition, $462,840 must be added to the montly relief figures for Board and Care. Recommendation: Reduce: Services and Supplies -$157,296 This figure will hold the General Relief budget at the 1971-72 budgeted level. If economic activity does in fact improve during fiscal year 1972-73, further flexibility will exist to cover unforeseen emergencies. -9- it • COUNTY LIBRARY The budget for the County Library System is recommended at slightly higher than 1971-72 budgeted allowance. However the budget contains a recommendation for 4 new positions and a total increase of $89,239. While increased activity is reported at the San Ramon and Moraga Branches, total circulation this past year is down from 1970-71 and remains at the level of 1968 and 1969, 2,900,000. The staffing of the libraries should be flexible enough to accommodate this steady workload without adding new staff this year. One measurement of the cost of the County Library is to compare the operating budget with the demand for books, the major purpose of the library. While staff provides related services to the public such as reference information and the order- ing and cataloging of new books, the main indicator of activity is the volumes checked out by the public. At the current time the cost to the county runs approximately one dollar per book checked out to operate the library -- a substantial cost in our opinion, con- sidering that the direct beneficiaries of this service are asked to pay nothing. Recommendation: Delete: 4 New Positions Reduce: Salaries and Wages -$18,912 We recommend that the County Board of Supervisors investigate the adoption of a charge for a four year library privilege card, exempting those under 18 years of age, and a possible 5C or 10c per volume fee to cover anticipated growth in operating expenses of the County Library System. COUNTY HOSPITAL The recommended budget represents a 7% increase over 1971-72. While this is not out of line in comparison with other units of county government, there is an issue we would like to raise. The State is involved in the financing of Mental Health Programs on a matching basis with the county. At the present time the county is exceeding its matching requirement by accepting patients not eligible for State funding. The amount of this totally county funded extension amounts to $650,000 for 1972-73. Recommendation: We request the County Board of Supervisors to investigate the need for exceeding the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act's eligibility requirements and recommend that in the future the County's Mental Health Program be tailored to meet maximum State matching requirements. Reduce: -$6507000 -10- PftS S RELEASE TAXAugust 18, 1972 CONTRA COSTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION P.O.BOX 27 / 820 MAIN STREET / MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553 / PHONE 228-5610 TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION ASKS $1,859,892 CUT IN COUNTY BUDGET The Contra Costa Taxpayers Association today issued its analysis of the 1972-73 County Budget. In the detailed review of the various departments,which make up the total County Budget, the Association makes specific recommendations amounting to a $1,859,892 reduction in the proposed budget. "While both state aid and property assessed valuations are scheduled to increase in 1972-73, a proposed expenditure increase of 8% threatens to wipe out revenue gains," stated William P. Baker, Executive Vice President of the Taxpayers Association. "If cuts aren' t made in the proposed budget, a tax rate increase (above the existing $3.024 per $100 of assessed valuation) is likely," warned Baker. In a letter to the Board of Supervisors the Taxpayers Association included the hope that its analysis would "serve as a resource to you in making the delicate decisions weighing proposed need for increased public services against the need for property tax relief. "I am confident that the Board of Supervisors will consider much needed property tax relief as more important than increasing public spending in 1972-73," Baker included. ti0 IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on ) Proposed County Budget for ) Friday, August 18, 1972 Fiscal Year 1972-1973• ) This being the time fixed for hearing on the 1972-1973 proposed County Budget, and proposed budgets for Special Districts (other than Fire Districts) and County Service Areas, notice of same having been given for the time and in the manner required by law, the Board proceeded with the hearing; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess, member of the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, Chairman) having reported to the Board that the Committee is still in the process of meeting with department heads and staff to discuss budget requests and policy items included in the proposed budget; that it is working strenuously to cut the budget where possible, and still maintain a reasonable level of services to the public, in an effort to ensure that there be no increase in the tax rate as compared to last year and, if possible, to reduce it below the level of last year; that the employee strike delayed the process of closing the books for the 1971- 1972 fiscal period which in turn delayed receipt of certain financial data (such as cash balances available for the 1972-1973 fiscal year) required by the committee in connection with its deliberations; that its recommendations on the proposed budget will be submitted to the Board at a later hearing and it suggested therefore that any persons .who wished to speak at this time be heard and that the hearing then be continued to a later date; and The Chairman having called upon interested persons to comment on the proposed budget, the following persons appeared: Mr. Vernon Gunnels, 1754 Elm Road, Concord, California; and Mr. John Zuppan, Franklin Canyon Road, Martinez, California, representing STIR ( Shocked Taxpayers in Revolt); and Mr. Gunnels and Mr. Zuppan each having noted the concern of taxpayers with regard to the property tax burden on homeowners and having urged that additional revenue resulting from increases in assessed valuations be used to cut the budget and effect a reduction in this years tax rate; and Board members having commented on the urgent need for property tax reform and the fact that the State Legislature once again had failed to produce the reform measures required to alleviate the property tax situation; and No one else having appeared to speak on the proposed budget, on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on same is CONTINUED to Monday, August 28, 1972 at 2 p.m. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a f— t,e do cornet coF3 of ABSENT: Supervisor J. P. Kenny. the original doca:aent on file is my office, ulld tilt It oval passed - adopted by tl c 130ard of ti�lpervirola o!' Gynt.-a Co_ta caunLy, California, oil cc: Auditor ti'" data �uu1W.-L A'rr:.•sr: 17, T. I'AAs CIJ, county '41'rg Ei "-officio clerk of said Board of Supervisory, Administrator by doputy clerk. G - -} s-�� © Z/j SUNNY IN AFTERNOONS • 4WARM TEMPERATURE LIGHT WIND NTYI FAM i LY EWSPAPER .OSTA — MARTINEZ, CALIF. — SATURDAY,AUG. 19, 1972 a: �;ars�isn�s wfiB02 SECTIONS — 12 PAGES i n AIM a w."cli Consideration By Supervisors To Resume Aug. 28 No Increase-In Levy Hope Told By Board's Finance Committee By JOHN R. HOLLIS City Editor Morning News-Gazette MARTINEZ — Only two taxpayers showed up . yesterday morning as county supervisors opened their hearing on the 1972-73 county budget of $171 million. Both John Zuppan, Martinez dairyman who Is president of Shocked Taxpayers in Revolt.(STIR), ' and V a r n o n Gunnels, C o n c o r d steamfitter, pleaded with the super. visors to reverse the an- nual trend of increases and to take the action necessary to reduce the tax levy. . The supervisors were not ready to really discuss the 1972-73 budget since the board's administration and finance committee — Super- v i s o r s James Moriarty, chairman, and Warren- Boggess, member — have not completed meetings with the v a r i o us department heads. Also the county stag has not finished analyzing the effect of additional state aid on the overall budget. Assistant Administrator Frank Fernandez said that the preliminary budget . would have required a 15- cent increase in the tax levy In order to be balanced. However, he said the in- crease in *Vessed valuation plus the additional aid should cut this levy"alightly. Boggess, speaking.for the administration and (mance committee,-said both he and Moriarty are "dedicated to the idea of a no tax (levy) increase and if possible a decrease. He said be m d''hb. co1- league believe this Possible became be' h See TAM Page d Ate. �'➢T;.;;a,` w'aw:="; �0ep .' 94; wilt-be<� ---r�asx-.an�aea::sesaartse;. r �- ,�a –`"-�, _�•s. , -„-.. kyr-'19,y .r.ile ;K-�-,------ atte4t�e a yy�,s �5 al. _ � `little e�•` shave t4 -�: }say- y' �> X these `� d zlsy, �z litittg �a tli ,.state :x "u a CLEasln� �'i`hP'�'bndKel dies wM!as' • ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE BUDGET STATEMENT August 18, 1972 The Administration and Finance Committee has been and is continuing to meet with department heads and staff to discuss budget requests and policy items included in the 1972-1973 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget. Your committee is working strenii- ously to cut the county budget in those areas where possiblew. while maintaining a reasonable level of services to the public — in ublic -in an effort to get the tax rate back to last year's level or perhaps reduce the rate. Needed additional fiscal information such as cash balances available for the 1972-1973 fiscal year are in the final phases of development. The entire process of closing the books, for the 1971-1972 fiscal period was delayed this year due to the employee strike resulting in some of the required financial data being somewhat later than usual. A report will be made by the Administration and Finance Committee as to its recommendations on the proposed budget at one of the later public hearings to be conducted by the Board. Ample opportunity will be afforded for complete review and discussion of the committee recommendations. It is suggested that the Board open the public meeting on the proposed budget for the 1972-1973 Fiscal Year at this time and hear comments and recommendations from those persons who wish to be heard so that their suggestions and points of view may be considered by both the Board and your committee.- P:,T - c L- EO�q� ORS 1 C i PA 6yeputy ANTRA COSTA COUNT-TO , JUVENILE JUSTICE COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND MRS. ROBERT T. ADAMS DELINQUENCY PREVENTION COMMISSION LOTH FLOOR COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 August 17, 1972 RECEIVED 7 & 7-2,Honorable James E. Moriarty W. P „ A S C H Honorable Warren N. Boggess CLCRKXDARDoe7 SUPERVISORS Administration and Finance Committee ay TOSTA CO uty Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Gentlemen: The Budget Committee of the Juvenile Justice-Delinquency Prevention Commission has carefully reviewed the budgets of the Probation Department and the institutions caring for wards of the Juvenile Court. We have had conferences with the Probation Officer, members of his staff and superinten- dents of the several institutions. In general , the Commission concurs with the County Administrator's recommendations. In addition, the Commission urges your favorable action on certain policy matters. PROBATION POLICY MATTER NO. 1 Additional Staff to Improve Case Load Standards We support the Department's request for these positions because the present staffing level is inadequate to achieve the results in reducing criminality that should be expected from a probation service. These requests will bring . the Probation Department closer to recognized standards established by State and National organizations, both public and private. Even if all of these requests were granted, however, the Department would still be significantly below such standards. We especially urge favorable action on the request for a training officer. Contra Costa County Probation Department is, to our knowledge, one of the few departments of its size that does nut have such a position. Many departments have several persons assigned to full time training duties. The Commission has long been concerned with the need for training to upgrade competence of personnel . In our opinion, money spent on improving probation services can be justified by the greater amount saved through de­ !zsed need for institutionalizing. When a convicted person is confined, it not only costs the taxpayers money to Honorable James E. ).Moriarty Honorable Warren N. Boggess August 17, 1972 Page 2 keep him in confinement, but frequently his family must seek public relief and society loses taxes the subject would have been paying were he productively employed. PROBATION POLICY MATTER NO. 2 Delinquency Prevention Officers The Commission and the Probation Department continually receive requests from our communities for assistance in developing delinquency prevention programs. The Department is not able to answer many of these requests because of limited manpower. Contra Costa County has only one person assigned to delinquency prevention activities. This puts Contra Costa far behind other California counties of comparable size. More effective community services focused on delinquency prevention could significantly reduce the numbers of juveniles referred to County services. A modest reduction would pay for the requested salaries many times over. The United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare, in a recent publica- tion, points out that it costs a minimum of $600.00 to bring a youth before the Court. This figure does not include the heavy costs of providing either proba- tion services or institutional care after court action. 'PROBATION POLICY MATTER NO. 3 Board and Care for Probationers Most departments , both State and County, providing probation and parole services, have available funds which can be given or loaned to probationers or parolees to assist them in getting started after they have been released from custody, or to provide emergency help in times of crises. The type of help referred to is short-term assistance in obtaining lodging and food, adequate work clothing to secure a job, and funds for transportation to work until such time as the subject can receive his first pay check. It is during the first critical days when a person is on probation that he most needs financial assistance. The temptation to commit further crimes for gain is especially acute during this period if he does not have sufficient money to take care of his minimal needs. BOYS' RANCH - BYRON We note that the County Administrator has recommended the inclusion of funds for additional night coverage at the Ranch. We strongly support this recommendation. For years members of the Commission have been concerned about the dangers inherent in the present level of night coverage. JUVENILE HALL POLICY MATTER Additional Personnel Honorable James E. Moriarty Honorable Warren N. Boggess August 17, 1972 Page 3 I . We recommend the inclusion of a position for an additional full-time nurse so that night coverage can be maintained at all times. It should be noted that the night nurse not only provides.for emergency medical service for children in the Hall but also dependent children in the .Shelter operated by the Social Service Department. Again, it is extremely dangerous not to have around-the-clock nursing personnel on duty. The present workload during the day-time hours precludes rescheduling staff to provide this night coverage. ll . The current ratio of counselors to children and the projected ratio when the new units are in operation remains inadequate to provide for the safety of staff and children. Because of continuing action by the Department to screen out youth who are not really in need of secure custody, the residual population is more volatile and difficult to supervise. Ill . The institutional helpers requested would relieve the staff from house- keeping duties, releasing them to concentrate on the functions for which they were employed. It has also come to our attention that counselors find it difficult to take needed breaks during their eight hour tour of duty. Such working conditions are contrary to accepted personnel standards. IV. Additional kitchen staff is needed: (A) To provide adequate supervision for youths working in the kitchen because, as pointed out above, they are less tractable than in the past; and (B) because there will be a greater area to service as soon as the new units are occupied. V. The storeroom clerk is needed to operate the central storeroom and dispersing center in the new wing of the Hall . If this position is not provided it will be impossible to utilize this storage area as designed. AID TO NEEDY CHILDREN - BOARDING HOMES AND INSTITUTIONS (Page 242) Foster Home Rate Increase We support the recommendation of the County Administrator for a $5.00 per month increase in the foster home rates. This is basically a cost of living increase. However, the rate scale will still be well below the out-of-pocket costs of foster parents. Yours very truly, MRS. ROBERT T. ADA,'-',S CHAIRMAN RTA:ds cc: J. P. McBrien, County Administrator John A. Davis , County Probation Officer Claude Van Marter, Deputy Director, Social Service Dept. Honorable Edmund Linscheid Honorable Alfred M. Dias Honorable James P. Kenny V/ LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF DIABLO VALLEY CALIFORNIA 56 Mayhew Drive Walnut Creek, Ca. August 139 1972 RECEIVED Chairman Linscheidi and Board Members ,. Administrative Building, P.Q. Box 911 Au 15 1912 Martinez, California, 94553 W. T. P A A S C H CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COQ RA C "T Co*. j«r= By CleAW The Diablo Valley League of Women Voters urges your continued financial support of the Educational Media Services Center at 2371 Stanwell Drive, Concord. As a citizens' grpup studying the state's role in education, we were given invaluable access to resource mater- ial and helpful assistance in our study. We believe that the Educam tional Media Service Center is providing a unique and needed service for the large number of groups throughout the county that are inter- rested in education, as well as for the education profession itself. Sincerely, �N y Kyne�r��E��d. Chm. 1971-72 w %Nww w pwmr� Valerie Clark, President WwThe League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization. 0.0. 0 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN Orinda Branch Representing Moraga,Lafayette and Orinda,California 5 Thorndale place boraga, California 94556 August 3, 1972 EIVED Board of Supervisors t!il ? —1972 Contra Costa. County W. -r. PAASCH Administration Building & RD OF SUPERVISORS iyiartinez, Calif ornia O RA C S A Co- Deputy, X• Gentlemen : Our branch of the American Association of University Women has used the Contra Costa County Schools ACCESS Information Center. In particular, the Dialogue on Women Section and the Education Section have found the Center particularly valuable. It is our hope that this center will continue to be available. Sincerely, Gayle B. Uilkema, President Orinda-Moraga-Lafayette .Branch Affidavit of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SS. c°TIgf*n`D fines q Gen. Mgr. .............................................. being duly sworn, deposes and says:That he is now,and at all times herein mentioned, has been, a resident of Contra Costa County, State of California, a citizen of the United States and State of California,over the age of 21 years,and in no way or manner interested in the subject of the an- nexed notice; that he is now, and at all times herein men- tioned has been General Manager, Principal Clerk or Office Manager of the CONTRA COSTA TIMES, and as such Manager has charge of the records of said newspaper; that said CONTRA COSTA TIMES is, and at all times herein mentioned was,,a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at the City of Walnut Creek.,Contra Costa County,State of California;that the CONTRA COSTA TIMES was decreed a newspaper of general circulation June SAT s 26, 1952, file No.55193;that the CONTRA'COSTA TIMES M01F f w is the continuation of and;successor of, the WALNUT CREEK COURIER JOURNAL; established in 1911 and de- creed a newspaper of general circulation October 22, 1934, file No. 19764; and that the said newspaper;is,now, and at all times herein mentioned has been , printed and published r - Tuesday, Wednesday,Thursday, Friday and Sunday of each week. Advertisement s� I SII That the .....�................... ........ �. .............................................. a copy of which is attached upon the left hand side of this . page opposite to this affidavit, was printed and published in said newspaper and in every issue thereof from and includ- ing the x 4 August t , � �. ......... day of ...................... .. Y to and including the .. .. day of ., At1pUSt 19 7:....... ;that is to say,said notice was published in the issues of said newspaper on the following dates: ....A..ugus.t.Y, .1M.................. C, t .............................................. t .............................................. t+: .............................................. .............................................. .............................................. Ilh ,max .............................................. .............................................. That the s d notice was published in the newspaper proper and not i a su pleme . LEL) rAffiant ubsci bed and sworn to (ore me, this ... day of ..qugu t. . 19rL2 : ^ 1 : 197`' W. T. PAASCN Nota P-blic in and for 6 ontra Costa Count , CLCRK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS State of California O TRA COSTA�CO. By _,. DeputyOFFICIAL SEAL. VIRGINIA L. LADD �® NOTAPYPUBLIC-CALIFORNIA CCN i RA COSTA COUNTY <aauFW P.1yCommissionExpires Aug.13,1973 1940 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Walnut Creek, Calif. A davit of Publication "ROTICE TO TAXPAYERS STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA j p' R. A. Bean being first duly swan deposes and :That at all times hereinafter mentioned....he was a citinen of the Unitedtates,over the age of eighteen years, and a resident of said Connq,and was and daring all said time the principal clerk to the Printer of The INDEPENDENT, a news per of general earealatioa printed and published daily,Sunday and leholidays excepted, in the Ciq of Rich. mond, in acid County of Contra Costa, State of California; that said The INDEPENDENT is,and was at all times herein mentioned a newspaper of general circulation as that term is defined by Section 4460 of the Political Code, and, as provided by acid section,is published for the dissemination of local and telegraphic news and intelligence of a general character,having a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and is not devoted to the interest,or published for the entertainment or instruction of a particular class,profession,trade,calling,race,denomination,or for the entertainment or instruction of any number of such classes, professions, trades, callings, races or denominations; that at all said times said newspaper has been established,printed and published in said City of Richmond,in said County and State at intervals for more than one year preceding the first publication of the notice herein mentioned,that said notice was set in type not smaller than nonpareil, and was preceded with words printed in black face type y gFax r not smaller than nonpareil, describing and expressing in general terms the purport and character of the notice intended to be given; that the................ NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS ................---......................................_.._._.................... (Proposed County Budget) .............. .............................................................................................................of which the annexed is a printed copy,was published and printed in said newspaper at i r one time °° '' ; feast _.......-•........__.........................._....-......._.......-.......-........................................_ Kr} g 4th day of Au ust.....1972 commencia on the............................... and ending on the_............4.th...........day of.........AUgUat-t....1 72_, r . }. r both days inclusive, to-wit: _--------Augus-t....4-=.-..1,972................. s r � tree• t'Au+►4-� `-a .._............._...--..........._......._................_.._..........._..._..._..._....._........... ......................................................................................................................................... That the notice was published in the newspaper proper d not in a supplement. __ _ .._.. _._.............._......................_.......-.... R. Bean F I L E D Subssr% ed and sworn to before me this c? 7, 1912 _ 4tb day of W. T. PAASCH CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS t•' Al] l]gt 71, A COSTA CO. �,. R 19___ By Deputy Lillian M. Low •Notary Publio in and for Contra Coats County, State of California. '<;613.:-�'�•. 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS In the Matter of BUDGETS -------------------------------------•------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1 SS- County of Contra Costa J <- w Sharon L. Tule of said County, being duly sworn, deposes and says: THAT she is and at all times herein mentioned was a citizen of the United States of America, over the age of twenty-one years, and that she is not, nor was she at any of the S times hereinafter named a party to, nor interested in the above entitled matter; that she is the PRINCIPAL CLERK OF THE PRINTER of the - "ANTIOCH LEDGER", a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in the City of Antioch, County of Contra Costa, State of Cali- fornia, and which newspaper is published for the dissemination of local and telegraphic news and intelligence of a general character, and which .y newspaper at all times here mentioned had and still has a bona fide subscription list of paying subscribers, and which newspaper has been es- tablished, printed and published at regular inter- vals in the said City of Antioch, County of Contra Costa, State of California, for a period exceeding one year next preceding the date of publication of the notice hereinafter referred to; and which newspaper is not devoted to nor published for the y4 interests, entertainment, or instruction of a par- ticular class, profession, trade, calling, race orVi denomination or any number of same; that the , notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, r - has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof, on the following dates, to-wit: Published August 4, 1972 ------------------------------------ - - -------•-- ---- - ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------•----------------------------------------- (Signed)___. --------------------------�___________________ _________ FILE D Subscribed and Sworn to before me this ALG 7 1972 W. T. PAASCH CLERK OARQ OF SUPERVISORS 5th day of__Au u St - -- 19.72_ TRA COSTA CO. _--__-- -------- B Notary Public In and for the County of Contra Costa, Legal No-72-292 State of California. .� 8� r�rg oat�Cauaty� LEONA MARCHETT! .� NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA r- PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY lly COMIP.c tore a � . f THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA C 0 STA COUNTY P. 0. Box 911 Martinez, California 94553 July 26, 1972 The Independent 164 Tenth Street Richmond, California 94801 Gentlemen: Re: Purchase Order ;# 22222 Enclosed is Notice to Taxpayers regarding availability of proposed County Budget Which we wish you to publish on August 4. 1972 Please sign the enclosed card and return it to this Office. Immediately upon the expiration of publication, send us an affidavit of publication in order that the Auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Very truly yours, U. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Nan I raham Deputy Clerk Enclosures i THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y P. 0. Box 911 Martinez, California 94553 July 26, 1972 Antioch Ledger F. 0. Box 70 4ntioch, California 94509 Gentlemen: Re: Purchase Order 4 22223 Enclosed is Notice to Taxpayers regarding availability of proposed County Budget Which we wish you to publish on August 4. 1972 Please sign the enclosed card and return it to this Office. Immediately upon the expiration of publication, send us an affidavit of publication in order that the Auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Very truly yours, U'. T. PAASCH, CLERK By. N anW In ab. Deputy Clerk Enclosures THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS C 0 N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y P. 0. BOX 911 Martinez, California 94553 July 26, 1972 Contra Costa Times P. 0. Boa 937 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Gentlemen: Re: Purchase Order # 22224 Enclosed is Noticeto Taxpayers regarding availability of proposed County Budget Which we wish you to publish on August 4, 1972 Please sign the enclosed card and return it to this Office. Irmnediately upon the expiration of publication, send us an affidavit of publication in order that the Auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Very truly yours, l:. T. PAASCH, CLERK By NancIn sham Deputy Clerk Enclosures ti NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVER that printed copies of the following budget documents for the fiscal year 1972-1973 will be available on August 8, 1972 to any taxpayer desiring a copy: Proposed County Budget, Proposed Special District (other than Fire District) Budgets, and Proposed County Service Area Budgets. Copies may be obtained at the Office of the County Clerk, or the County Auditor-Controller, Martinez, California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of Super- visors will meet for the purpose of fixing the aforesaid budgets for fiscal year 1972-1973 on Friday, August 18, 1972 at 9:30 a.m., in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, Californ ia .at which time and place any taxpayer may appear and be heard regarding the increase, decrease or omission of any item in the proposed budgets, or for the inclusion of additional items. All proposals for the increase or the inclusion of additional items shall be submitted in writing to the Clerk of the Board before the close of the public hearing. Should there be any applications or requests for a further hearing on file, such hearing shall be continued from day to day until concluded, but not to exceed a total of ten days. DATED: July 25, 1972 W. T. PAASCH, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California By� d.-� NancyVIngtAham Deputy Clerk In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California July 2$ 19 72 In the Matter of Fixing Time for Hearing on Proposed Contra Costa County Budget, Proposed Special District Budgets, and Proposed County Service Area Budgets. On motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Super- visor A. M. Dias, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Friday, August 18, 1972 at 9:30 a.m. is fixed as the time for public hearing, in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California on the proposed county budget, proposed county special districts (other than fire districts) budgets, and proposed county service area budgets for the fiscal year 1972-1973; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the aforesaid hearing be given pursuant to Section 29066 of the Govern- ment Code, and the public be advised that beginning August 8, 1972 the proposed budget documents will be available to taxpayers. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c: County Administrator Supervisors County Auditor affixed this 25th day of July , 1972 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By l ,Xeltol- Deputy Clerk t cy 6Fngraham H 941 1 1/71 1O r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California July 18 19 72 In the Matter of Approving 1972-2973 Proposed Budgets for County Special Districts and County Service Areas . The County Auditor-Controller having filed with this Board 1972-1973 fiscal year proposed budgets for county special districts (exclusive of county fire protection districts ) and county service areas; and The County Auditor-Controller and the County Administrator having recommended that the aforesaid budgets be accepted as the proposed budgets and serve as the bases for review and consideration for adoption as the final budgets for the 1972-1973 fiscal year; and The County Administrator having also recommended that the sum of $1,250 be included in the proposed budgets for County Service Area D-129, Sandmound Acres; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor A. M. Dias, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid 1972-1973 proposed budgets, inclusive of the budget for County Service Area D-12, Sandmound Acres, ,are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : County Administrator Supervisors County Auditor affixed this 18th day of July , 19 'Z2 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By1ir Deputy Clerk Deanna Petrie H 11 11/71 10M - r 71 t" t 3w� c9- S7 ............ CN. 1 .f DFUNK • DIVISICN SUPERVISORS P 11UI '-ON ROLLER INTERNAL AUDIT AUDITCSR-CO;:T ROLLER OFFICE JOHN A. AYLARD O'.AL BOUCHL'T TAX AND SPECIAL SSI NT AUDITOR-CONTROLLER r DISTRICT ACCOUNTING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SAM KIMOTO FINANCE BUILDING ACCOUNTING ROY D. MEEK MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 • PURCHASING PHONE (415) 228.3000 WALTER A. SEYDEN SYSTEMS July 14, 1972 ARTHUR T. STURGESS DATA PROCESSING GLEN TAYLOR Supervisor James P. Kenny, District I Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District II Supervisor 'James E. Moriarty, District III Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District IV Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District V Enclosed are proposed budget requests for County Special Districts other than fire districts. The schedules include proposed budget, total requirements, and estimated revenues other than taxes. We request that these budgets be adopted by your board on July 18, 1972. These proposed budgets must be adopted on or before July 20, 1972. • H. DONALD FUNK Auditor-Controller t HDF:gd Enclosures RE IaD X91 fi7a w P ASCH CLE A F SUPER ORS N COST Deputy By 'i t 1 I .-+ 1 NO.O O 00000 COO OO N to 0 • CIS M d tnMtA (%j 0000if) 0 M OqctItt Lntnv O to t0 .3 CT r- Cd Cd Ol et 7 O .-� 1 r+ .-�1 O r1 O r♦ M N .4 N M . . . . . . . . . . . . as ;L3 r♦ .-4 F-. a a r 1 rloo 0o 00o000 00 � l9t 00 r♦ N d r-I to M N 00 to 00 M M d et M to N N to to il- +1 C7M M O .•� r1 r--1 O r1 0 r-t M M r-4 N .•-t M , CA Cd . . . . . . . . . . . . t t t 1-4 M C1 M t- to W O %0 n m to CT M O to et t� M O N %O O C1 w Ln r--t r-C M 00 CT M M r♦ N Cl H M \0 r-q O M M W .D to %0 N 0 M 00 'T O [t M O It 'O O +1 M CT -tt t` t� M O d- N %0 00 fl- Nw rw et et . O Cd N m CO M .N-+ M � -4 C4 N N Oa et N r-1 r-1 0-4 -4 N V) E- C4 0 C4) `- O E+ 1-4 1-4 N et 00 N N \0 co %0 M -tr M N of to +-t N Tr 4J 'O .-1 00 N r-1 n 01 00 'gr \0 M 00 M r-4 to t` It 00 -4 k0 t U to M (A et \O Cil t- N � r-1 \0 O l� t� O 'd N 1- 0 r-4 M r-i N to Co Ow W a - CIS 4) N st .-t t` to r o0 N N N N W M M to qtt O N CT M M I't M O O M O %0 0 00 to r-1 N 00 14T coo CT M ND t M N Itt O 00 O 00 \0 M \0 n n O 00 CT to 'RT to t- N w w w w w w w w w w w w w w + w H Mw�D t� t� O r O I0 CA N \0 000 0 M C. NI': d• �O r-1 •ri N O M eT t� to -4 I\ N N co Itt N r-1 r1 r-i r-1 Cd O +1 r♦ r-4 M C7l ri E• Er cz 0 O t10 M lq:r \0 M N M %0 \0 t- M tt t- t- t- t- O rl ri CT O1 �q M O Ar-1 r-1 t. C% to lqzt CA r� t� fl, IRr 00 CT fl. N to O N O N \0 N r-t \0 lcr Ilzr O ,O•rt M CA n t� %D ri to O N V r♦ 0-1 M t- O O 00 C1 to t-- to r1 rn to 4J td V w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w + w w +.1 O r-t , tt M 00 r•-t r-•1 CT N 00 CT t- \0 O %0 to O t0 r♦ at to r1 t" N O U t4 •,I Cd N N -cr to M \0 r4 to r•1 to O r1 et *.t %0 to et •rc b Cd O 01 r-1 N C) r--/ \0 r4 M w +1 Q LC. M to to •rC rO A y to r-4 O to Pa .H O U N O 0. 1 to 00 t- O t,. O et w CA O m M O N t-to M r-t O1wt r-C M M "IT ¢. O N C1 t� O � ri 1- O 00 00 N diC70 M _ N -t N -CT N r1 O •7 t- \0 Cn M H t- \0 M a0 to t� O N M CT N 00 r-1 r•1 r�CT to M Cl r4 t`- to 00 � ,rl N Cd O +�1 11 w 0 w r-1 to Nw N w Ow C1 w r�: w w w C w w tow Mw.M w mt w Cl w M+ w r w w w >. 1r•-1 0 r l r-C O +1 N +1 a, L'. M � t- r-4 O r-1 M et r-1 �0 N t� CT to t- to N t0 t0 to 9 � E r-1 r-1 M N M CA r-1 O r-1 O r♦ U N 4.1 91 Ci>l O O r-1 t- 00 RPj F•1 O O to M O 4) N to Mw Mw �0 •rt C7 r-1 r-1 .. O O LA00n O t, Oqct0001OCTVIO N ntAMOC t` r♦ MG7 %0 t N Ci n O t` r4n00000N 'Ct00 m C4 'Tr NON to %014t1` \0 1 •rl t- %0 M 00 to t� O N M C1 N o0 r-t r-t t- M to O Gl t" t� to o0 00 •O P. M O r--t to tom• N O C1 n .-4 wt a 00 \0 to M M CIS C1 t- r4 t- %0 CA >; O K M IR:r t- 00 O r•1 M it r-4 \0 N !` \0 to t- to r-1 t0 V O O 14 O r♦ r-4 r--i N M Cl r-1 01 r-iIML4 14 P4-r4 �t x O P++1 r--t aT \0 W +1 Q Cd O . .rl O to w 4J 4J u t td •r4 •� Cdk 4J O d) 41 M tn N •r•1 r/ A Ci: d O A tx7 ts'i. f; co W •4 0 k r-t N M r� 00 00 Ct Cil O +1 O U Cd O +1 0 p U •rt •rt P Cn t i_ to U +1 Y -14 +1 •r1 H (D •rt O C.) O O G 0 O CU N R k O O r;. U .0 O U) P 3'. >- 1; C K P = L: L: O +1 O O Lt Cn 0 r-4U .0 +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U to H to A C tia O f >, 0u7NN NN NNNN •r1 +1 W Q •r1 4-1 +1 rl b A N +1 CS. 1j 2j P Q r•{ r-4 . 1 r-t r-1 r-t .-+ .-� . 1 O K p a O •r 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CD O 00 O O U Cn 0. O ri N t'+ k k k H k H k r--C U A +1 F •H U O +1 4-1 +1 +1 +1 4-1 +1 +.1 +1 Lt. c3 Cn Z k .-+ M -S r-4 +1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r1 H 0 M ,�o \0 %0 C1 N n r-t O N 1 1 1 Cd C U U U U U U U U U Cd M r1 r~ rt r-t r1 r-1 r-1 N ('� Cd +1 1--t Cn LL L1- L:. +1 O r 7-r -r z ft ab :U: a +.1 U F O U •OCIO bb -O .Obb O A O • 1 U > Cd Cy Cd F O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E• H W +1 000 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O s; L: K P f; L; P L= H t-1 k O � •-• V-4 rt 1 .1 r- r-1 1 .1 —4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O Q Q Q 0 L" m LL L" ". mL1. Le ts. 0 -1 N N N N N N N N •r•1 a O •-•� i-1 A GL U LL M t N 1 OO O -ret 00 11 in ;' 0 4; t`• t, X 4, M O r-1 O O N to N 'In cl td td rda cOnOVo ti o as N 4J cl clH tx 1 •d t- r4 et N kD N r•/ M 0 U) N c0 w M O 00 tT F1 t- N t-- N CIA cT 00 N • .�{ w w w w w w w w O d in O Ln � to � H ��'. � rl r•1 .-1 � ,..�- w 0 K Cd OH co Ln M tnLAN N (1 4J 't 3 00 00 n t!1 O 00 It n O u 00 N r-4 r-1 N r-4 Ln r-4 t� 41 -O • 4) w w w w � .'0 •LI N tom,tn > N M r--1 r-1 N O O r4 r♦ Cd 0 N N et cn 1\ M Q1 00 N �• rL1 r r-4 Ln M Ln O1 00 M O O tt Oet N O w w w w w w w w , rn 00 r-1 •r4 to O r-4 � tl1 M O %D !t Cd 0 41 C K d i~ r4 O w 0 0 ri H H tr E 0 bD r4 V to O O O %0 M 1'- %0 N M r4 Ln It r4 G.• t:1 r-4 O O O O t�N O O r-4 %D m N ri .0 •r1 O ri N O t- N to r-1 O r4 N 4J td U w w w w w w w w w w w 4..1 0) r•4 0 CO r-4 G1 Ln le tT .-4 N N "q to to N It ri 0 bio • 00 coo -it -,1 10 td = N 0-4 N %0 � r0•I V-4M N r-4t r 1 4J t� to •r4 TS A d N r-1 O ria •r1 O U k 0 a. t M %0 0) O O O Ln Q O to O M r-1 Ln %0 P4 tU M N Ln O O O ri 00 O cs r-1 t0 Ol N.r•1 t� M k t� r-4 00 O O O %0 U7 O r-4 00 to r-1 O r-t N r-4 -rl to w w w w w w w td :3 +J r♦ tT Ow N Cw 00 11w 1!� H v t n Nw w w v 00 41 N 41 d 9: 00 r-i O %0 v O M to N Ln tt r♦ %0 r. � 4) M r-i r-1 M N N w w O r4 00 rl U N N r-4 O 00 Vf O .-1 O Lf) tn 4) H 0c0 Qh1 rN4 St 9-4 f4 0 O M M to •rt C.7 a ri N d 0 a M %0 C.1 Cl 0 O u•1 O O to N 00 r-i v %D t M N tPt O O O r-4 00 O 0% r•1 00 v t- 00 1 •rt 00 O O O iD to O r-4 alLnO to t71 •r1 k/� w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w TS Y• r-4 tT O t!1 et M co t- 1n r-4 N r-1 N r-1 O G: O 0 00 r-1 O �O ti O Ln to N N r-4 r-4 9-1 0P+01:14 k 0 M 17 N N r-1 r-4 Lt] 4-1 Q td 'LI m � rs •r4 O r•1 U O v 4) G• W'• tn 4-1 1 1 to N 0 Cd a 0 tD tq 41 Cd •14 •rpt S ¢ •a 9 O Q a u a A Id td '"4 0u o •r}+ 07 tD .c t7 d ••U a ted r-i •rt H H U3 r- 1 N t I ¢ z to z 0 cd U 0 41 0 0 O to O O t, td O to td 4J r-4 to ►-1 z y., 4J U) 4) A 0 4-1 U 0 d) r•4 td H O u C w i-t k O O :1 •ri 'b >. U H •r 1 0 LU r N Q 0,' •ri 41 Q U > = 41 w f• S4 t� CL •td 0 U 0 td t,`a� O w 0 k d it O O H H t4 w 4 O ZF: r4C 4J •r4 UR: ¢ O O uUOO O atY >-+ •rtMMton E» :9ft cn k •rt U s; •r4 U Q. a A -IV 4u 44 � 41 Z -H P P 1-1 N t•.1 tl N G' r-1 -3 O U) 4J 4J 4J 4t O cC v U cs •14 0 t 1 Of H 9) t 1 1 td 6 a O U U 0 0 4J ►-4 $4 H -rl +j A M A 0 A 4j A to CL G. 0. 4 t a. a7 •r1 •,1 •rt -r1 •r1 U F O P 1. O O O 4J f4 fi S4 k •r4 U 4J 4J cd td H td td co H He^�-�'�• td 4•t 4J 4J P f4 W N tn 4J O v 4.1 0 0 d t-• 45 N N N N 4J F E .4 •r4 O P H f4 .-7 •r4 •r4 •r1 •r1 •r4 H O OG] A OQQ O � QQ Q r. aAAA A Oa.. t� 0 0 x to r 1 N r--1 r` Q1 Cl O M N M 0 Ln 00MLn NOO �+ n r'� X +J O O r-4 r-I N r•/ N d) 'JI CT C71 co Cd 0O W .-q .-4 H a L., a t %0 Ln to 4m to 71 "Cr 00I'll m r4 CD SC M O .-t ri N r-I N ri r••I H C1» 1 O M M %0n000V1n M m Ln �t OON %DMM %D N t?1 N N 0000ON %O %0 N w w w w �t r-� .•� N M L11 1 00 M O U x a, f~ Ln Ln r-1 Nr N N st N 00 cn H a & '� •-� r4 cd O H O 00 00 r-I M Itt Ln � M N +1 r� n OO r-1 -I to r-I r-1 N �, fJ N O m r- 00 co O O I'll +J ,t1 • Q) �+ w w O i-/ W > O d)w tn �r -Oa CSS a O C1 r-I r-I rl O N M r-/ O Ln ,.O r4 N N 00 r-1 r- r-+ Ln 111 00 I N N N 00 %D 00 r•+ %D Ln �O U w w w w w w w w w w • f i Ln N N N Ict to Ln C71 �O Q -H W Ln Ln r-I vt N N -W N 00 td y� :3 +-1 O R1 a H E-• tz N bA r� M Ln tom- N O h r-+ O r-I 00 N r-4 O Ln 00 %0 N .-I g r� O 1- Al O O d• r-I rl 00 N O M Nf VS r-1 r-/ %D p •r-I r-a R• 00 Ln N r•/ N rt M I,. O 00 r-+ %0 %D Ln M %D W +„1 Cd U w w w w w w w w w w w w +-1 4) r-# 0 Ln M N N M m Q1 h t� r- N M t'f Ln 1b to O V b0 •r+ Cd M N ri N %0 It V1 r-I r•/ Ln •r+ T7 Cd 9 N r- +-1 W •r+ "C3 A CJ N r-1 O Cd a •r+ O C1r I f- N Ln r\ N O Co r-1 O r-I C71 M r+ N O O NO n a CU r" N r- tT O O %D r♦ r- 00 ..4t 00 qY r-t r- %D -10 C/) M f+ r-+ %D 00 In N .-+ Cr � M n N %D n Ln n r-1 -T M r`+ .r-I W . w w w w w w w w w w w w >> 1 Cd ',3 +-1 Ln 00 N N M L71 r-I h+ r: 0 Ll1 t�•O O 00 N 11 +1 N +J W K M N r-/ N �D O O r-I 111 M M %D M M = tr O O N N M 01 N =Sc1 Ha E. w O r-1 ri r•I U N 4) r- h 00 00 w w O r, W d0 r-I O O k O N r-I r-+ N N •ri C7 a M M ' O• O a CS N N O N h 01 r♦ O r-1 O 01 r-I C4 0 0% %O I- 1 h N v O O M %0 r♦ rl� 00 •M 00 •L7 r-1 n %0 110 It 1 •r+ r-/ %D N 00 N M Ln v M r.. M CD r- Ln r- F-4 IRT M w w w w w w w a Ln 00 0o r-I M n O n n 00 LI; n O O 00 N Lr; M N r-1 Ln 00 co r-I Ln M M %D M M W d cd N r-I .-+ ' N G>l �•1 H 3 � O tn M O Cd z be 41 41 Cd i . c0 v N O r. O R >% m r+ ni +-3 0 D d rC U U � 4Jt~ > W $ O O H b0 O d) r--. O I.1 U U O U r-I (D O A U] W •yr+ --I4JCd Cd •rl v v 4.1 4J �' I f-1 r J C 4J G k -O fd U) W -1 4 1 41 O o C4 O r- +•1 (- O d) .� +,i r -O �a r+ cd O Cn ta7 Cd C U d) +1 d) 3 cn O U c3 0 0 +-1 a O >. cn O -4 U •r+ U = 1--1 -r-I U A A Cly H E 0 .% W fd W +..1 C3. +•1 >� H f+ +-1 Q •:7 r•+ +.1 H C7 Q = to k iJ H W Q Q C] CY M O tJ Cd d O d ►-+ C) :G r~ r/) Z t: f-t rr r� r� 1, n r-1 .-+ as U cn O O w Cx V O •r+ Z Qm- a :tt :m -u a Cn • w w U x •'r�{ Nr-tNMMcO u 41 U) « 0 +.1 P i.! +-1 +J r-I !/ r•-I N r-+ a ur fN M tt" V tY rd t-0 Q U U U U U U C3 tJ I 1 Cd Q 0 I 1 1 t 1 1 Cd •r+ 4.1 L:7 •r4 •rl •r•1 .r1 •rl •r 4 •rt +•1 Cl1 to rn N H N U3 J .-7 -3 A r-1 -3 +.1 -3 U +-1 N N F•I $4 fr P O O G 0 •r+ x C;1 " 4-I V y +-1 +-► E-. Cd Cd H H 4 c1 Ld Cd cC Ld td it H +-1 W W W W W W d) Q +� O O Q) d) N O +•1 1-1 •r1 •r+ -H -rr •r1 •rl •r4 t; N F-1 p to i-1 N k N •U) t¢ cnooc CA OQ ¢ H o ¢ ¢ e A � to U � U10:93 i i vI c0NOI" co Nrt M 1. d %0 r-4 -I0 • NM N Cot- o %0 a) d -'t Q %0 (A O m 00M O 4J I- I- X 4J I*l 1-4 -4 r4 r-4 .--1 In n M O N O N N r-4 E-r 1:4 r4 'S. I NO O %0d o0 O M01 r•1 Op ri N Q) ri r•1 N t-, t, O r•/ N 0% cn M M .-4 r4 t!) .-4 r-C N O N C4 cl (71 Cd r-1 r-4 [� r•i r-4 I m O Co 1--1 %0 o0 N M 00 d M N O O N 00 M O m to r4 d 0 M N O to O M 10 O O N 01 I. f-I to M t- d M In n r-4 N t� In M n t� M 01 d O +0 Ln M I- d %O 1••4 m r- rl O r-4 01 %O U }}(( CS• R r-tM r-•1 O O M O O [� 4) Q .••c N y}tn� Cd O O E-r M N to d %0 r-+ r- d N N N %0 r•4 O •rl +� b r-1 N O rn in d � rn d M 4J >, U d %G N to Ln O cd C Was M M O N cs • b Cd CU � � N v N O N N MCnN t71N 0O00 M 00 N N In O M y IU .0 r-10NdO M N V Immo V4 O O O MO ' to t OdMd \O MI� CONOMM C1 I-• t*l M tnln N 0 w w w w w w w w Cd f•1 tiD to CO d �O r-4 01 Ow r-1 In .•� Ow CO -rl tn r--1 M r♦ r-4 (D Cd N d Oki O Cd CU O H a � ami O N N 0p 000NCA \0 N00O0001M CnN o0 M M M •ct00: •rt r••4 O M %O O M 0) M Ln M N t� r-4 00 N Coo Ln Ln O (31 %0 rO •r4 r•-1 %0 d �. O d Cn r, d r•4 ct d N V-4 r-4 r•1 O d CA m t/1 43 Cd U w w w w w w w w w w w w +1 0rte+ r- r- 4 C0 01 r4 M r-4 N r-4 M OMO co n .00 •rq 'd Cd V.14 N � 4w d N A a) Cd r4 O •,tb.1 C ,fl U 1-t Cq O Q. t ON to d o0 N I� O o0 I� r-4 M Ln %O In M 00 M r-/ +1 CnM 0 N OOO AMClt- W MCf) \O to O In Ln O MI- Cd f•1 r 4 O CO c0 N d O It N It cv 00 t*l r-4 00 00 M O d I-- r.4 -r4 N w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w Cd O 4-J \O t- \0 M 00 M N r-4 M N r-•1 00 d c71 to X O O O r-4 d r-4 N .-� � t M d r-4 4.1 O U O ) Cd 0O O 14 F4 +J S lA Q) -rj a O O O cr 0 N cz •r•1 O NMdCnNngo0nr-4M M \D to N 00 Mr-4 O I Ln O O 00 t71 M O n 00 M Ln \O Ln O to cn O M t- 14 t •ri r-4 O co 00 N d O d N d N 00 t*- r-i 00 00 M O It a) r.1 1•'1 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w R. \O I, \O M 00 M N .-4 M N r-4 00 d t71 In O O I- r4 d r••1 C14 r-4 M n •C* t- a) tU k O r-C M r-4 t3. k ¢.-rt n W +O) Q Cid v O U Cd O t; - Q 1 41 1 f; Cd Cd •rr44 Cd W •rt r-4 a) Cd CU C7 0 1 0 u PO N G rO4 O c'Cdd a) q U 9 4-) •r4 b cd 4) O 1-4 U O U O Cd C: A T3 I- C) 41 -4 Id Cd •r4 a •rI O Q Cl' O k O O k O :n > a) to U Z v a) :c O a) .0 )•4 O O < O to Cd O td r4 Cd LC. C4 E r-4 U as .Q r♦ O •r4 Cn O Cd O Cn O En cd > M U 1- Cd -4 •r4 Cy 'ZI O O 41 U d O 0 a) >• 0 r1 cd C:1 t•4 Cd •r4 CG •r4 0' C •O O U] ..0 >. CO -0 >. C) {•t 1-1 >.+j Q k Cd 00 CJ Q -C > O I» •rt +-1 td O >. 41 O Q •,..I 4.1 f; 3 Q 4-/ Cd Q .4 r-. P: C • I. •-1 tr r4 U r-4 W r-4 O Cd O I- O k ►-C 0 0 0 0 0 0 >, f•+ O W O U >- U O r-4 O :;1-• O Cd C7 O O O C..' UAC m G x [.2 O O .-4 U O 1, t-t U % .c. b •riI J y •rt U >? w - w-ti N it d to O U > r. 't1 > I 00 O r-4 r-t r--r r-4 r-4 r•4 r-4 to I r-4 cd ...7 Z S. 4 C) 1 i 1 t 1 I 1 i I 1 1 1 t c3 r4 a A Cd O < O O 1 t •r4 < >1 Cd Cd cd Cd Cd Cd cd Cd Cd cd Cd Cd Cd H Cd Q >1 td Cd S4 _> 41 a) U 0 O N a) a) a) a) a) a) fay) N 4a O w 41 N a vim) C: ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q < < < Q4 < 6Q U :j •r1 ►-+ O 0w O A x U U U t 1 M 10 0 0 0 O co "Ar" atCd 4-3 Na o Lr) CD o a Lo H w -4 CV 0 ,a•1 O O 0 0 00 rn � a a rMi � � a 1 \0 00 tt7 O r1 CA •tr v rf \0 U) .-i � 00 1- v ri ii M r1 (M •r1 w w w U) \0 "� N N N 00 U }4 47' i; %0 O N .O to t!) O to to d' 0 0 0 N N .-i r♦ 00 w vl N X rn O H rt N 00 N NO to r•i M M A +•+ b .-a 00 Ln >% U ri tip Ln \0 N O M M 'L1 t41 to qN rt ri N t!! C 131 04 O 0 W A a M in 4 N td a 0 \0 0) h co M O v U) M 1 M N \0 O M O N h to t!1 t`% 0 w w w w w w w w w w F-i if O M N M cT r-+ to %0 \0 00 r•1 •r{ U) %0 O N %0 M LO 0 \0 \0 00 Cd :3N N rr 41 t t O1 +•i X cr = HHS E N � 7 0 tab r+ M 1� N 110 \0 N W t71 t71 t!) ri O \0 N t;)1 00 nr� H N %0 O •r+ N +1 td U M M ri N 00 O O Ln 00 DS M M O +•t 0 ri 1: tJl ri M ri \0 M O C71 er Nu to N of •� 0 •> .ri r r�Cd -t `O tr7 N to O O O Ol N e i e-i t0 /1 t0 ¢ LL. w Ot) A 0 rn rt 0 to 04 •rt O 0 a 1 0 0 •tr ri r- en \0 to \0 r-t %0 \0 00 N A* w \0 00 ri r o 00 0 0 r+ En M fi %0 10 h %D 00 NT O W Cf ti0 m 471 h 1\ ri •ri to w w w w w w w w w w w w w Cd Z 4J d tr1 v to ri pl M 0 r1 0 00 ,0o N i.1 N +.i t7' >~ M �0 00 ri 1` N rt \0 \0 00 0 t7) " r•� M ri r i N N tC1 rzU N +•i r-t 0}� ami H �t °i 0r-k 4) ai N to cr a1 a 0 O v .-4 t` u, w •O \0 •-) •-+ 1 N 'er \0 %0 00 r-i r- O M 00 O O N 0 -,4 t0 c0 I�.t 0 160 O tO Q1 m Ol w w w w w w w w w •C• Ln v to ri tT M 4m r 4 O 00 00 Cw O S." M \0 00 rt r- N r{ tip X .'J ¢.+.t 0-4 M ri r/ d N N W 4J Q O .1 n 'L3 +-i f= - O U v � U O � td d td 0 $4 0 k � .F-t tU a -4 a +' > m W � � o i r- Cd .`""ti 1 z 0 >. Os "4 >% cc lu 4J .-. cc ;m o 0 o .-0+ 0 0 O O G m H 0 cn m .x P4H O 4.) < 41al� al d rt N !S. 0 0 � Q SJ W a O D O 1•c U 0 w w w w w U U a. Q u •u to 0 W U w -0 r•i N M t0 t!) P t-1 Q .i N to rt M "4 ri W a N ;c, H > w w i i i i i t Oz k � \0 a 1� ca s0 ca x a w U a 41 u 1-4f`-i. to � a F- o •,q d m m F• Hm cd m es m m F a +� H c7 fi C 1 v 0 0 d + 0 0 0 0 0 0 W )r 4J G' U K H it k k k k U O •.+ w a d d ::s < < < Q to cJ A 0: U W U OJWe of County Auditor-Controllers Page 1 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund . Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Services & Supplies 3,525 Reserve for Contingencies 200 Total Requirements 3,725 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Services & Supplies 111,760 Fixed Assets 17,938 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 Total Requirements 130,698 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Services $ Supplies 40,400 Reserve for Contingencies 977 Total Requirements 41,377 Flood Control Contra Costa Flood Control & Water Conservation General Salaries it Employee Benefits 895,500 Services & Supplies 220,100 Fixed Assets 20,800 Reserve for Contingencies 51,177 General Reserve 125,000 Total Requirements 1;312,577 Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Services & Supplies 88,000 t Fixed Assets 106,000 Reserve for Contingencies 8,710 Total Requirements 202,710 Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Services $ Supplies 2,000 Fixed Assets 304,500 Reserve for Contingencies 3-,574 Total Requirements 310,074 Zone 3B (Central County) General Services & Supplies 1,078,000 Other Charges 41,500 Fixed Assets 2,841,500 Reserve for Contingencies 2783208 General Reserve 700,000 Total Requirements 4,939,208 Off,3,ce of County Auditor-Controller Page 2 Districts Governed Through Board of Superv7sors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget Flood Control (cont'd) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Services & Supplies 28,000 Fixed Assets 114,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,389 Total Requirements 147,389 Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Services & Supplies 11,000 Reserve for Contingencies 980 Total Requirements 11,980 Subzone SA General Fixed Assets 61,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,229 Total Requirements 64,229 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Services $ Supplies 23,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,845 Total Requirements 24,845 Subzone 9A General Fixed Assets 75,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,180 Total Requirements 78,180 Storm Drainage r Zone ##1 (Lafayette Valley Estates) General t Other Charges 500 Fixed Assets 5,200 Reserve for Contingencies 27 Total Requirements 5,727 Zone ##10 (West of Danville) General Services $ Supplies S00 Fixed Assets 152,500 Reserve for Contingencies 945 Total Requirements 153,945 Zone #713 (North & West of Alamo) General Fixed Assets 69,000 Reserve for Contingencies 419525 Total Requirements 733,525 Zone ##16 (Gregory Gardens) General Other Charges 5,000 Fixed Assets 43,000 Reserve for Contingencies 4,800 General Reserve 1,541 54,341 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 3 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget) 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget Storm Drainage (Cont'd) Zone #16 (Gregory Gardens) Debt Service Other Charges 17,757 General Reserve 5,357 Total Requirements 23,114 Zone #16 (Gregory Gardens) Construction Fixed Assets 9,000 General Reserve 929 Total Requirements 9,929 Zone #19 (North Richmond Area) General Services & Supplies 250 Fixed Assets 1,450 Reserve for Contingencies 61 Total Requirements 1,761 Zone #22 (N.E. Ygnacio Valley) General Fixed Assets 65,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,543 Total Requirements 67,543 Zone #77 (West Sherman Area) General Other Charges 2,000 Fixed Assets 63,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,879 Total Requirements 66,879 t Storm Drain Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General Services & Supplies 3,000 Fixed Assets 364,000 Reserve for Contingencies 14,733 Total Requirements 381,733 District #4 (San Pablo Area) Services & Supplies General 16,500 Fixed Assets 1,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,626 Total Requirements 19,126 County Service Area - Drainage 2 General Services $ Supplies 3,000 Other Charges 3,000 Fixed Assets 57,070 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 65,000 Office of County Auditor-Controllef Page 4 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed ?dame of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Drainage 3 General Services & Supplies S,000 Fixed Assets 35,000 Reserve for -Contingencies 4,000 44,000 County Service Area - Police 1 P-1 (Crockett) General Salaries £ Employee Benefits 7,695 Services & Supplies 670 Reserve for Contingencies 250 Total Requirements 8,615 County Service Area - Police 2 General Services & Supplies 53,580 Reserve for Contingencies 4,000 • , 57,580 County Service Area - Police 4 General Services $ Supplies 55,000 Total Requirements 55,000 County Sanitation District #3 (Tara Hills Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,588 General- Reserve 233,975 Total Requirements 245,563 t District #5 (Port Costa) General Services $ Supplies 6,947 r� Fixed Assets 4,000' Reserve for Contingencies 1,094 General Reserve 150 Total Requirements 12,191 District #5 (Port Costa) Debt Service Other Charges 1,574 General Reserve 21P451 Total Requirements 4,025 District rM (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 1071110 Fixed Assets 1,090,150 Reserve for Contingencies 13,726 General Reserve 57,130 Total Requirements 1,268,116 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 5 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Sanitation (Cont 'd) District 007A (West Pittsburg Area) Debt Service Other Charges 28,622 Total Requirements 28,622 District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Fixed Assets Reserve 235,177 Total Requirements 235,177 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) General Services & Supplies 8,242 General Reserve 4,633 Total Requirements 12,875 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,800 General Reserve 10,797 Total Requirements 223597 District #15 (Bethel Island Area) General Services & Supplies Fixed Assets 2,912 Reserve for Contingencies 290 Total Requirements 3,202 District #19 (Byron Area) General Services & Supplies 52,125 t Reserve for Contingencies 5,212 General Reserve 11,763 Total Requirements 69,100 r County Service Area - Sewerage S-1 (Sandmound) General Services & Supplies 411 Total Requirements 411 S-2 (Oakley) General Services & Supplies -7,370 Total Requirements 7,370 County Service Area - Lighting L-32 (Kensington) General Services £ Supplies 14,263 Reserve for Contingencies 1,426 Total Requirements 15,689 � r Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 6 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Lighting (Cont'd) L-41 (West County) General Services & Supplies 52,492 Reserve for Contingencies 53,249 57.741 L-42 (North Central County) General Services & Supplies 27,739 Reserve for Contingencies 2,773 Total Requirements 30,512 L-43 (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 27,973 Reserve for Contingencies 2,797 Total Requirements 30,770 L-45 (North Central County) General Services $ Supplies 61,972 Reserve for Contingencies 6,197 Total Requirements 68,169 L-46 (North West County) General Services & Supplies 29,515 Reserve for Contingencies 2,951 Total Requirements 32,466 County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta Ferry) General Services $ Supplies 16,150 Total Requirements 16,150 r. M-3 (Rollingivood) General Services & Supplies 6,420 642 Reserve for Contingencies Total Requirements 7,062 1.1-4 (South San Ramon) General Services & Supplies 42,550 Reserve for Contingencies 4,255 Total Requirements 46,805 M-6 (Danville Area) General Services & Supplies 12,622 Reserve for Contingencies 1,262 Total Requirements 13,884 N y } ' v Oce of County Auditor-Controlle,0 Page 7 Districts Governed Th rough Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Cont 'd) M-7 (Nortk Richmond) General Services & Supplies 711817 Reserve for Contingencies 781 Total Requirements 8,598 M-8 (Byron Area) General Services & Supplies 3,120 Reserve for Contingencies 312 Total Requirements 3,432 14-9 (Orinda) General Services & Supplies 1,907 Reserve for Contingencies 190 Total Requirements 2,097 M-11 (Orinda Area) General Services £ Supplies 19,526 Reserve for Contingencies 1,952 Total Requirements 21,478 M-12 (F1 Sobrante Area) General Services & Supplies 7,080 Fixed Assets 5,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,208 r Total Requirements 13,288 t M-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Services & Supplies 398 Reserve for Contingencies 39 r, Total Requirements 437 M-14 (Clayton Area) General Services & Supplies 2,047 Reserve for Contingencies 204 Total Requirements 211251 M-15 (Ygnacio Dalley) General Services & Supplies 790 Reserve for Contingencies 79 Total Requirements 869 M-16 (Clyde Area) General Services ; Supplies 1,596 Reserve for Contingencies 159 Total Requirements 1,755 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 8 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Roads RD-1 (Muir Oaks) General Services & Supplies 805 Reserve for Contingencies 50 Total Requirements 855 County Service Area - Recreation R-1 (Montalvin Manor) General Services & Supplies 10,076 Fixed Assets 34,500 Reserve for Contingencies 4,457 Total Requirements 49,033 R-4 (Moraga) General Services $ Supplies 3,910 Fixed Assets - . 156,471 Reserve for Contingencies 15,090 Total Requirements 175,471 R-5 (South Danville) General Services $ Supplies 4,200 Reserve for Contingencies 420 Total Requirements 42620 R-6 (Ori:nda) General Services $ Supplies 11,650 t Fixed Assets 112,368 Reserve for Contingencies 11,622 Total Requirements 1350640 County Service Area - Library Lib-2 (F1 Sobrante) General Fixed Assets 841661 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 Total Requirements 85,661 Lib-5 (Pleasant Hill) General Services £, Supplies 1,887 Total Requirements 1,887 Lib-10 (Pinole) General Fixed Assets 117,415 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 119,415 Lib-11 (Oakley) General Services $ Supplies 3,076 Total Requirements 3,076 t � Office of County Auditor-Controlle• Page 9 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 Proposed Budget 1972-73 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Library (Cont'd) Lib-12 (Moraga) General Fixed Assets 77,606 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements _ 79,606 Lib-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Fixed Assets 119,036 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 121,036 Rater Agency Contra Costa County General Salaries $ Employee Benefits 41P800 Services & Supplies 239,660 Reserve for Contingencies 24,446 Total Requirements. 268,906 r t r? t O*cc of County Auditor-Controll� Page 1 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Dire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District- $ Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Homeoi:nier's Property Tax Relief 179 Business Inventory Tax Relief 2 181 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 620 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,696 4,316 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,909 3,923 Flood Control Contra Costa County General Planning F Engineering 506,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 15,111 Business Inventory Tax Relief 6,661 527,772 r Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Federal Subvention 23.000 t State Subvention 3,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,359 Business Inventory Tax Relief 314 .,: 6,673 Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General State Subvention 280,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 170 Business Inventory Tax Relief 6 • 280 Zone 3B (Central County) General East Bay Regional Park Subvention 222,000 State Subvention 646,500 Federal Subvention 260,000 Other Subvention 75,000 Homeou,n er's Property Tax Relief 50,884 Business Inventory Tax Relief 8,162 1,262,546 1 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 2 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District F Revenue Item Fund Recommended Flood Control (Cont'd) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Iiomeoi%ner's Property Tax Relief 11174 Business Inventory Tax Relief 913 2,087 Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Homeotimer's Property Tax Relief 123 Business Inventory Tax Relief 22 145 Zone 8A General County Subvention 13,000 Homeoi%mer's Property Ta.-,( Relief 405 Business Inventory Tax Relief 69 13,474 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 612 Business Inventory Tax Relief 15 627 Zone 9A General State Subvention 3,000 t Homeoi%mer's Property Tax Relief 2,106 Business Inventory Tax Relief 51 r 5,157 Storm Drain Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General County Subvention 35,000 Zone 3B Subvention 2,000 Drainage Fees 72000 Homeoti.mer's Property Tax Relief 5,650 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,441 51,091 District #4 (San Pablo Area) General Homeozner's Property Tax Relief 519 Business Inventory Tax Relief 9S 614 i r Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 3 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing = 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District 4 Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Area D-2 (Walnut Creek) General Drainage 50,000 50,000 D-3 (Antioch) General Drainage Fees 40,000 40,000 County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 539 Business Invenitory Tax Relief 137 676 P-2 (Danville-Alamo) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,533 Business Inventory Tax Relief 160 2,693 P-4 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,761 *. Business- Inventory Tax Relief 146 2,907 t County Sanitation District #5 (Port Costa) General Sewer Use Charges 9,676 9,676 District 7A (Gest Pittsburg Area) General Interest on Invested Funds 1,000 Sewer Services 2,558 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 300 Federal Subvention 848,000 From Construction Fund 124,591 976,449 District 7A (19est Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Bella Vista Reserve 29,163 Connection f, Dvelopment Fees 150,000 Interest on Investments 2,000 181,163 r t 0 ice of County Auditor-Controller Page 4 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Sanitation - (Cont'd) District 7B (Port Chicago Area) General Sewer Use Charges 8,242 8,242 District "15 (Bethel Island Area) General Sewer Service Charge 882 882 District 1'119 (Discovery Bay) General Sewer Services 37,200 Engineering Services 15,000 52,200 County Service Area - Lighting L-32 (Kensington) General Homeoi%uier's Property Tax Relief 1,021 Business Inventory Tax Relief 12 1,033 L-41 (West County) General Homew mer's Property- Tax Relief 4,029 ,. Business- Inventory Tax Relief 95 4,124 L-42 (North Central County) General Homeotim er's Property Tax Relief 1,737 r Business Inventory Tax Relief 118 1,855 L-43 (West Pittsburg Area) General From L-47 589 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,509 Business Inventory Tax Relief IS7 3,235 L-45 (North Central County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,531 Business Inventory Tax Relief 148 2,679 L-46 (North hest County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,002 Business Inventory Tax Relief 357 2,359 i Ace of County Auditor-Controlls Page S Special Districts under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Dire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District $ Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Areas - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta berry) General Homemmer's Property Tax Relief 98 98 M-3 (Rollingwood) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief S28 Business Inventory Tax Relief S 533 M-4 (South San Ramon) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,816 Business Inventory Tax Relief 452 3,268 M-6 (Danville Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 148 148 M-7 (North Richmond) General Homeowmer's Property Tax Relief 199 Business Inventory Tax Relief 344 543 t M-9 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 33 33 M-12 (EI Sobrante) General Homeoumer's Property Tax Relief 21 Business Inventory Tax Relief 584 605 NI-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 11 11 bl-14 (Clayttrn) General Homeowmer's Property Tax Relief 44 44 ,MI-16 (Clyde Area) General From L-44 41 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 114 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3 158 t ' Office of County Auditor-Controller• Page 6 Special Districts under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Areas - Miscellaneous (Cont'd) RD-1 (Muir Oak) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 44 44 County Service Area - Recreation R-1 (Montalvin Manor) General Iiomcoi%mer's Property Tax Relief 3,748 Business Inventory Tax Relief 84 3,832 R-4 (Moraga) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4,781 Business Inventory Tax Relief 280 5,061 R-5 (South Danville) General Homeoimer's Property Tax Relief 304 304 R-6 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,266 r Business. Inventory Tax Relief 17 Interest on Investments 3,150 f 6,433 County Service Areas - Libraries LIB-2 (El Sobrante) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,490 Business Inventory Tax Relief 70 1,560 LIB-10 (Pinole) General Ilomeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,093 Business Inventory Tax Relief 188 5,231 LIB-12 (Moraga) General Homeoiener's Property Tax Relief 2,869 Business Inventory Tax Relief 167 3,036 Ace of County Auditor-Controllo Page 7 Special Districts .Undcr Authority of County Board of supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1972-73 Budget (Included in available financing) 1972-73 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended LIB-13 (Ygnacio Dalley) General Homewoier's Property Tax Relief 33730 Business Inventory Tax Relief 364 4,094 Contra Costa Water Agency General }lomeoi%mer's Property Tax Relief 7,484 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3,085 10,569 L r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa "County, State of California June 20 19 72 In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of 1972-1973 Budget Message of the County Administrator. The County Administrator having submitted his BUDGET MESSAGE for the fiscal year 1972-1973 ; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor J. E . Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said BUDGET MESSAGE is ACKNOWLEDGED ; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said BUDGET MESSAGE is APPROVED as the basis for the preparation and issuance by the County Auditor-Controller of the 1972-1973 Proposed County Budget; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the BUDGET MESSAGE is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Moriarty and W. N. Boggess) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisors A. M. Dias and W. N. Boggess. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of cc: Auditor Supervisors Administrator affixed this 20th day of June ,.1972 Board Committee W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Do othy A. Harkness H24 4/72 10M IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA in the YlaLtsr of Referrals } to Administration and Finance April 24, 1972 Committee of the Hoard. } 3 The Board :Hereto-'ore having mads certain referrals to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. 14oriarty and W. X. Boggess ); and Said committee having reported and recommended as follovrs wi.t"a respect to aforesaid referrals: Rsferral Ds to Ito 1 Re a mamend a,�o Positions Review Of nro ositions Givespecial. attention to —L-18-72 3 allocated L-o county departments continuation of special from Emergency Employment Act positions in budget review Funds. for the 1972-1973 -'fiscal year. Remove as committee referral. 1-31-72 Report of :he 1971 Grand Jury Board considered and Taxes/Assessment Committee. approved report of County Administrator on said committee report ma March 31, 19;2. Remove as committee referral. 2-1572 Report of Co,mty Administrator Public hearing held on on the Watson Amendment. Watson Tax Limitation Initiative and on Co-anty Supervisors Association Tax Re y'orni Program. on March 27,, 1972, and determ:.nay-ion made to endorse the latter taros.:-am. Remove as committee referral. 4-4-72 Memorandum report of County Committee has review3d wid Administrator responding to concurs with repor-, .sub- the greneral, comments and mitted by Administrator recur? nandat;ions of the 1971 but believes a survey of County Grani Jury. county departmonts by managemeni consultant's may be in order after th3 results of the cverall review of cowt;y gov.3rn~nent organization seeing m fide by the County Association of Caywi+ornia are made available and if the' costs involved a:.°e reasonable 'aa Beard having considered said caammi.ttee report and determined the :�e coalnie;oda .i.ors to be appropriate; NC ii, TIFF PORE, on motion of Supervisor Moriarty, second ad by Sud a y� v'_.sor J.. P,: Kenn y, IT 13 .BY TF2 BOARD ORDZRR- ? that the aforesaid rt3cozunandazions o' iti: A--17iini3tration and Finance Committee are APPROVE., rt ?he J'oregoinnC order was passed by the following vote of the Board A M-.', Supervisors J. P. Ferny, A. M. Dias , J. R. Moriarty! W. W. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid. NO'I'm I-Tone. ABSP T: If one . I .HEREBY CERTIFY Inat the foregoing is a true Brad cox,,ract copy of ,z ox der entered o)� the minutes of said Board of Supa�}i-1 cors on the dato ,f c:.tesa' . Wi:mess my "hand and the Seel of the Board of Suuerviso»., 9_S E A L affixed this 21 th day of April, 972 , jo Bv LOLl`'e t t Dt�out�r vlerk A cc:'- AaminL-1trato:9 Auditor-Ccnt,."o13.ar Assessor Superior Cozy t So ora terg IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE. OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Referrals ) %o Board Human Resources ) April 4, 1972 Committee. ) The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its Human Resources Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and J. P. Kenny) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to aforesaid referrals : Referral Late Item Recommendation 12/14/71 i Letter from civic organiza- Board of Supervisors action / e tions submitting suggestions taken on *larch 14 , 1972 on related to County Human recommendation of Administration Relations Commission. and Finance Committee ; remove as committee referral. 3/9/71 Proposal for adoption of a Refer to County Administrator 1/31 �� landmarks ordinance. for further evaluation of need, methods of implementation and costs of administration of a landmarks ordinance. 1/31/72* Resolution from City of Ordinance adopted 9/30/73; Walnut Creek advocating remove as committee referral. adoption of nark dedication ordinance. 1/31/72* Vacancy created by resig- R. E. Jornlin, County Welfare nation of District Attorney Director, heretofore designated O'Alalley as Chairman of the by the Board to replace Drug Abuse Executive *ir. O'Malley; remove as Committee. committee referral. 1/31/72 Letter from E. S. Kreins, Committee finds that letter Chairman, Contra Costa answered satisfactorily by County Police Chiefs County Administrator; remove Association,concerning as committee referral. status of county jail project. 2/8/72 `//Request of Contra Costa Consider in conjunction with County Friendship Club for budget review for 1972-1973 financial assistance with fiscal year; remove as club activities. committee referral. 2/15/72 Request of Contra Costa Approve request with the County Inter-Agency Nutrition understanding that no financial Council for recognition as commitment on the part of the the official organization county is involved. for nutrition in Contra Costa County. 2/28/72 1'ru;oosed actimi or Mate "latter resolved by enactment Department of Social Welfare of special legislation at the terminating assistance to 1972 session of the California certain AFDC children over State Legislature; remove as 18 years of age. committee referral. Referral Date Item Recommendation 3/21/72 Establishment of procedures Committee agrees that such for annual meetings between meetings are an excellent Board of Supervisors and idea; refer matter to R. E. Board of Directors of Contra Jornlin, County Welfare Costa Council on Aging. Director, to correspond with Council to make suitable arrangements for annual meeting. The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recommendations to be appropriate; NOW, T11FREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommenda.- r.:ion5 of its tdwman Resources Committee are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: DYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, N. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed (S E A L) this 4th day of April, 1972. W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By a Q. *uAte-ew— cc: Assemblyman John T. Knox Dorothy Harkness Contra Costa County Recreation F Deputy Clerk Natural Resources Commission County Counsel County Administrator City of Walnut Creek SIT. Richard Juba Human Relations Commission County Welfare Director-2 Contra Costa County Drug Abuse . Council County Auditor F. Scalercio County Sheriff Mr. Joseph J. Flanagan, Jr. M. s . K. Wyciham County Health Officer Contra Costa Council on Aging IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Referrals ) to Administration and Finance March 14, 1972 Committee of the Board. The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors J. E. Moriarty and W. N. Boggess); and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to aforesaid referrals: Referral Date Item Recommendation 1-31--72* Letter from Attorney J. H. ) Wilson pertaining to federal flood and landslide insurance. ) Consolidate into one 1-31-72# Report of County Adminis- ) general committee trator on federal flood ) referral pertaining and landslide insurance. ) to federal flood and landslide insurance. 1-31-72* Letter from State Office ) of Emergency Services ) concerning federal flood ) and landslide insurance. ) 1-31-72# Acquisition of right of Property is within the way for West Antioch boundaries of the City Creek, County Service of Antioch which there- Area D-!3, Antioch area. fore has a primary interest in the matter, but continued follow up by Flood Control and Public Works Department staff is in order; remove as committee referral. 2-15-72 Request of Mr. H. L. Clarke Deny request; freeze on behalf of Local l that imposed by the federal county employees be paid government as a matter interest on money from of national interest, merit increases withheld and program does not during Phase I of the contemplate payment of Economic Stabilization interest on compensation Program. deferred by the freeze. *Carry-over item from 1971 Administration and Finance Committee. Referral Date Item Recommendation 2-15-72 Reimbursement to members Provide actual, necessary of all county commissions and reasonable expenses, for expenses - inclusive as a minimum, to members of the payment of stipends of all official county to the Contra Costa County commissions so that Hogan Relations Commission. voluntary public service, an important facet of local government, may be provided without financial sacrifice. Consider new, or increased, stipends in conjunction with review of the budget for 1972-1973 Fiscal. year. The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recommendations to be appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that -the aforesaid recommendations of its Administration and Finance Committee are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M.- Dias, J. E. Moriarty, E. A. Linscheid, W. N. Boggess. NOES: None. ABSENT: None . I HEREBY CERTIF=Y that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed (S E A L) this 24th day of March, 1972. W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By AucG2& t-nC'.ctc`� cc: Attorney J. H. Wilson Loourette Kincaid --- Administrator Deputy Clerk Flood Control District Director of Planning County Counsel Buildingg Inspector Mr. H. L. Clarke, Local 1 Personnel Director Auditor Human Relations Commission Attn: Mrs. Mary Golden ,t MODEL CITIES CENTER FOR LAw & TIUSTICE 2M EAST Bay JM.LYN AVENUE ROBERT H. PEREZ IN REPLY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LOS ANGELES, CA.JFOPN'A 9CO33 PLEASE REFER TO ARTHUR A.CORRALES LEPHONF 273 256-2590 DEPUTY DIRECTOR RECEIVED1. Decetber .a, 1973 DEC 101973 J. R. OLSiON OF supm"SmTA i Clerk, Board of Supervisors All California Counties r; Dear Sir: 1 We are conducting a comparative study of public ex- '-' ' penditures for what we describe as "Private" services, �',• and we would appreciate receiving a copy of your latest �. county budget. Your cooperation in this matter is greatly appreciated. Very truly yours,Ve t `—JOHN TRAPANI Director of Litigation JT:j:a 1 i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California October 16 ' 19 73 In the Matter of Request of Carquinez Coalition for Revenue Sharing Funds. At the conclusion of the hearings on the County Budget for the 1973-74 fiscal year the Board having retained in the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) the request of the Carquinez Coalition for Federal Revenue Sharing funds to implement a low cost public transportation system for the communities of Crockett, Port Costa, and Rodeo; and Supervisor Boggess having this day reported in behalf of said Committee recommended that the aforesaid request be denied inasmuch as all Federal Revenue Sharing fund allocations have already been made for the fiscal year 1973-74; and Supervisor Boggess having further recommended the suggestion be made to Mr. Sebe Hill, Chairman of the aforesaid Coalition, that he renew his request prior to the hearings on the budget for the fiscal year 1974-75; and Supervisor Linscheid having seconded the motion, the same was passed by the following vote of the Board : AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES: None . ABSENT: None . I, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of c c : Mr. Hill Supervisors County Administrator affixed this 16th day of October . 19 73 4ftt- W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Vera Net on H 24 5/73-15M WA N N. BOGGESS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUPERVISOR FOURTH DISTRICT 1331 CONCORD AVENUE. CONCORD. CALIFORNIA 94520 • 687-6900 s. F713 OCTOBER 15, 1973 cit eo PAA S By IV DR SUPERV ISpRS REPORT OlePuty OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON CARQUINEZ COALITION REQUEST FOR FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR LOW COST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM. The Administration and Finance Committee met today and considered the request of the Carquinez Coalition for Revenue Sharing funds to implement a low cost public tfansportation system for the communities of Crockett, Port Costa and Rodeo. In view of the fact that Federal Revenue Sharing £undsallocations have already been made for this year, the Committee is recommending denial of the request with the suggestion to Mr. Hill, President of the Coalition, that he renew his request at budget time next year. r Warren N. Boggess, Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, Supervisor District Four District Five 4 t3lb r' BOARD 0--' E SUPR OH , � 1� HEARING ON: 7^s31.t. ; I r�. 1 tD_�� Pll�,� o.. LATS: ,. _.�....d.... .. .Re.,.....,,.�. . Sr"L:T'I�� -..�.�sr..r+..mss.r.+..r.wewr.,rwnrros.n.w..+.w�r.�.+rr.•...�.ov.•rsv.....crs.+a.r•..•„+-.: .:[;:.,:7�•u�:_:rri�i'tl�.'t �.�;�,?!,y V� C�R.G-.�t`;�jFir � �� .�� tl�,i.��i -•---,.,.:..>,r...-v.w,..s.+.. � ke ' C' l Et.SiP. slip onSOt31U*�i� flow -� g tCEEIVED AASCH CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS /j TRA COSTA CO. Sy LC _ Deputyl Changes In Proposal : 1 . Where the name Bay-V-Vista appears thru out the proposal as users of the transportation services , shall be change to ;ead tractC57-58)Rodeo, Port Costa and Crockett residents as users of the service. :3 2. Route Schedual system. A- To be workfin second month of cperatiun , with resdients of tract 57-58. 3. In place of free* service, first year and there after, t change tc read low-cost transpurtation system: 25 cents. fare for residents of tract 57-58, seniur citizens fare 15 ce.ats . `-5 ►t13 ►s. r Carquinez Coalition Sebe Hill, Chairman 118 California Street Rodeo, California 94572 Contra Costa Board of Supervisors I'lartinez, California Dear Sirs: We, the members of the Carquinez Coalition who represent Rodeo Crockett and Port Costa (census tracts 57 and 58) feel that our area should share in the _federal revenue sharing funds now being allocated. We request a place on the hearing agenda May 15 and will submit our proposal by :00 pm on May 1. Sincere fir, Sebe Hill, Chairman Carquinez Coalition RECEIVED II ; ;ko at-,m' APR W) 1973 W. T. PAASCH CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY aANTRA COSTA CO. ? Deputy rn ,4 ei�� ZZ 55 ti � V r � RECEIVED APP /91973 T. PAASCH LsCLERK OF SUPERVISORS Ay tleDurY ac 2. 7A � V —tic, � coz" d\ CAROV11EZ CM=CN _ PROPOSAL: MERAL GENERAL REVE:NWE SHARING P 1 The Carquinez Coalition, a nan-profit organization, Was founded for the purpose of uniting groups within the areas in order to prorate the welfare of all residents. The Carquinez nez Coalition, representing coir munities of Crockett, Rodeo, and Port Costa (oensus tracts 57 and 58) feels that local residents are best qualified to control their own com- munity programns. For these reasons the Coalition is fisting funding six programs that would meet the most urgent needs of our camrnunities. A brief work description and supporting budget outline of each program follows. 0 RECEIVED P. M. MAY I, 1973 W. T. PAASCH CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CO T OSTA CO. By Deputy Carquinez Coaltoo 525"Second-St"et Radom, Calif. 94572 • SENIOR CITIZENS There are active and growing Senior Citizen groups in Rodeo and Crockett. These groups are engaged in several projects.to enhance the lives of our Senior Citizens in areas such as health, transportation, reaching and involving isolated persons, housing, and volunteer recruitment. We feel that at least a part-time staff person and sane meeting facilities are needed to continue these projects. We therefore request a budget of $12,000 for one year's operation: Staff $6,000 Rental $2,000 Total Budget $8,000 ' -.: �M ROLEO HEAD START PROPOSAL 1973 SUMMER PROGRAM The Rodeo Head Start hereby submits the following proposal and budget in hopes of receiving Revenue Sharing monies, thus allowing for the operation of a summer program in this area. While currently providing pre school services for forty-eight children in the Crockett/Port Costa/Rodeo oaammities, it is generally felt that an eight weeks summer program with the sane basic concepts, could prove very beneficial for children and parents alike. We propose to expand the enrollment frau forty-eight to sixty children, and expand the age limit to accarodate children from three to six years of age. This will allow for an intensified class of pre- kindergarten children as well as those just canpleting kindergarten, but needing reinforced studies. The program will operate from 18 June - 10 August 1973, with three classes of twenty children each. The class day will remain as it cur- rently is - 9:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Children will be grouped chronolo- gically, and each class will be staffed by a teacher, assistant teacher and parent and youth volunteers. Rodeo Headstart - Summer Program Proposal - 1973 Salaries and Wages $8,984.00 Consultant and Contract Serv. 125.00 Travel 652.00 Utilities 94.00 Consumable Supplies 1,530.00 Equipment 300.00 Zb�al ProgramOu YOUTH PROGRAMS Partly because of geographic isolation and transportation problems, there is a real lack of recreational facilities and activities for youth in these cam unities. This project would provide for a full- time planner and organizer to develope ccmminity programs with cam mitt' resources and involve neat. Staff $10,000 Operating Expenses 5,000 Total Budget $15,00 rF THE DPaM-IN CX7C.lNSEIAING CENTER PROJECT PURPOSE: TO PIWIDE COUNSELING, EDUCATION AND REFERE2AL SERVICES FOR THE FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUAi:S IN OUR COMMUNITIES REGARDIF,SS OF ClXDR OR QtEED. SERVICES: COUNSELING FOR ALL AC'S BY LICENSED PRACTITIONERS. GROUP WORK, EVALUATICN AND DEFERRAL, EDUCATION IN FAMILY LIVING AND RELA'T'ED PROBIRC. STAFF: AN ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, AND SECIWARIAL ASSISTANCE, CON- SULTANTS AND PART TIME SPECIALISTS. FUNDING: (GOAL IS TO BECOME SELF SUPPORTING WITHIN ONE YEAR) SLIDING FEE Sam=, GRANT'S, CONTRACT SERVICES WITH EEPAMiE NT OF MENTAL HEALTH, VETERANS AMNIINISTRATICN, CIA CHE'S, ETC. COST: STAFF $7,600 OPERATIONS 2,400 $10.000 SEED MCNEY PDR BEGINNING OPERATIONS t: f TRANSPORTATIM Transportation is one of the major problems facing our caanmity residents. Adequate transportation within our area to necessary work points, medical service, shopping and educational facilities, has not been available. Simply stated, area residents are not adequately served by the transportation systems that are available in Contra Costa County. They are poorly served because of three main factors; 1. Low incame, 2. They live in a area poorly or not served at all by public transit, 3. They are confronted by a transportation netvmrk and facilities strongly oriented toward the private automobile. Furthermore, these problems interact with one another and in so doing further augment the transportation difficulties of the camauzities. The transportation project will provide a 24-hour link-up transport isystem to AC and BART, thus increasing the aocesibility of employment markets, shopping areas, recreational., and health facilities. x r BUDGET FOR MINI-BUS TRANSPCICATIM SYSTEM NUMBER ITEM COST 4 15-seat minibus @ $5,000 each........................... . .@20,000.00 8 2-way radio system for minibuses $87 each and antenna @ $15 each) ............. ... .. ............................. 768.00 1 Base antenna 2-way radio system.......... ..... .. ....... . . . 30.00 1 Project Director... .... .. .............. ...... ......... .. . . 10,000.00 7 Bus operators (4-full time at $600.00 per month for 12 months) (3 half-time at $300.00 per month for 12 vonths night shift) 39,600.00 1 Dispatcher (670/mo, for 12 months) ... ... ....... ....... ... 8,040.00 Fringe benefits (15%) .... ......0..................... .... . 11,206.00 1 Urban Consultant.......................................... 3,000.00 (Travel allotment for mini-buses) (Up-keep and repairs) ........... ...... .. . ... .. ........ .... (11�/mile x 5,000 miles/mo. x 12 mos. x 4 mini. buses...... 22,000.00 Insurance ($651.50 1 yr. x 4 minibus) ................... .. 2,616.00 TC7TTAL $106,678.00 CAMUiMZ COALITICN The Coalition itself does not see any need for a staff parson, but intends to rely on local, elected citizens to provide leadership for these programs. Accordingly, it is requesting only a $12,000 derating budget for necessary clerical help, travel expenses, and possible consultant fees if needed. BUDGET SUNNI W Carquinez Coalition $12,000 Sensor Citizens 81000 Headstart Sumner Program 11,685 Youth Program 15,000 Counseling Project 10,000 Transportation Project 106,678 TOTAL BUDGET $163t363 its t < a f� e Proposal for 5 , � r 4 ' Mini-Bus Transportation System t For Hays--Vista Residents i 1 i i i S } . n 5s M { ' Sutwitted to i Hoard of Supervisors i Contra Costa County Martinez# California 1 "u Willis Papillion Graduate Student '2 ;.a School of Welfare U.C. 'Berkeley -a" Prepared for 3;3 Community organizer Advisor and Social Planner, Bayo-Vista Tenant Council Assigned to Sayo-Vista Tenant Council t Bayo-Vista Housing Project q°t "do*# Cslifornis tN, MlSd �'fPtq( " '.fiyxTilr�* SE °kn1�I ;'S i t'4`' ,, 5. 3 � +, 4. t r a � r'1::a ' .,:•� e �t` }'"�"1- (f it -i _4, SF ai xt a` ,� "`F�yr f � t �5 .:y.�t a ♦ e + 5N u � tY + f } s z �aC) , +, t tS.,�Sc,''.�xiti Y ya'�r,.iH'tfl ,�.,r�''}r'.<i,.�5 ,..T}.r�{�w 5 �.�.ik'" } ;t' � t ,., ,5•'r�. t ,.'s s ..�,;.f}. #.'fit,. ,a.ra.?•;i,.. ..... ..,,,• Y;:fi ,_ -,,r ,F.i. .,r.. ,r;:. t,.a .. `� � ..:£:.:. ,.tr., ti TABLa at colP more Page lo TRMISPORTATION YoR THE RasiDwas or AAYO-VISTA•••{•*•{*•• 1 HOUSE PROJECT« 1 F.. (a) INTRODUCTION -»w The•Need 1 iITATImENT OF Tali PROBLEM.*•{#•••*•»#!{#!:•.••{i!••{»{•!!{ 2 (b) Transportation .#,• Not Adequate 2{ OWGRAPHICAL1 sKBTCli•!!#•t•{{*!.*!*#•*•*t*••!••r•* � �.r•*{ 2 ;A: (a) service Area (b) Characteristics of The Tenants Of the Bayo-ovists, t� House Project ` 4. Theoretical etetement!••{••!.#*».*.#•*•*•{•••.•.*{*••#•!• a +e So The Specific d Go General project Goals and ob,)ectives».#•#{###!•*!.!*#•••• 7 7* Discription of Activities#•##*•**•!!•••*•.•r•!•••••*•!•!• a B# Project Adm►inistri�tl0n###••••!••!!!•••••!#*•**»•,•#•#*•{•• � ' operatinq Tine Table*•{»•#*. •»**..+►••«R»#N,{,#».!«•*••eggs jib (a) Activities f 14• Budget F+or Bayo-Vista Mini+eus Transportation system,*,#q# 1t f11• Programs svaluation.•#.•!••***#••*••{�s••*•»{•».•.•#r•*•N• 11 12{ Suneary•!•!#•#•••••»#•!•i!••{!!i{•i•{•••{•{{#»i•#{i{{{•»! �� ; 129 Survey#•*.••*#•«••«,*!•#*!.•••••••!!•!*••••#!•!!**•**•!*•• 17 144 Mini-DUm Transportation ayfte�e•••{#{•••»•#i••#••#{»••i•M• 8 1'i• Bibliagraphy.r*•{•••**••+►*•*.•M••.••«••••*.••••.•••{•».{• 20 ; • f rgQ r.�t+a!r.rn Ny..!nra •�' i.l,"s\'+rik"9q'r+�`�'u `./t�f' .•!S,�`f'1.4T" .Mie"' t ' '' ' •• ,�1" {'RT' 7'TMw'F^a'# rrsmf¢+rn«}•t :rt'twrge 4af4't'�`+� '4!!'�M. S[',' �j1 4�'t'�•7' tt . ����4 rk tt:: t ,. #' i s= '", t t ? � t + c t �� t;f r -�` -- � tai i h�.riff f •�t r i�. TRANSPORTATION FOR TNS RBMENTS Or BAYO-VI STA HOUSING -p RO!M4"� Is INTRODUCTION The Needs What are the special transportation needs of Poverty areas? This is a question frequently asked. The answer iso that the + poor do not have special requirements they have sauna needs as everyone else# but have to depend more on public transportation, j Transportation requirements are not a function of income,. levels# 'but are only wiodifted by income insofar as it may affect 5 y the trip .purpose unit and its position in the hierachy of i trip purposes Although in poverty areas the work trips probable l t rank highest, poor people trust also travel for shopping, medical dare$ education, recreation and all of the other services I essential to a normal pattern of living* They may have special i problems# being poor and confined in areas where facilities are lackin s but ,their transportation q po requirements are the Sarno• It is not a question of special requirenmentsp but of special i problems• i Limited mobility is one of the problems arising frost lack of money. Uniting economic circumstances restrict access to means of transportation• If poor people were able to aoqutire sufficient funds# they could use public transit where it is adequate, or purchase automobiles where it is note without such, funds they stay not be able to do either# or lacking a choice } may be forced to depend upon the public transportation systm t h OV en lhnWW it may not fully serve their needs• j � 1 r, r -r-The Hayo-Vista Residents A. 4TATIMWr OF THE p{tOBLt�MMI ; Are Pot Adequately served. 1 problems lacing the Bayo- T ns at is one of the major Vista residents• Adequate transportation within the Rodeo CVista housing projAet area as well City liuits, and the Bayo- + ,1 4 se to necessary work points medical service�' shopping dna i„ educational facilities, has not been a+vaille• 1 have had to rely on priwete auto- The 8eyo-Vista resents . t t; mobile for which they aresill equipped to pay. Insurance i• obtain and r+aintaannend other relates wry difficult for them to costs are an additional bundene Cars in poor repair often lead to accidentso tardinessg -and aboenteeiso• Accumulated park- ' ing and other traffic tickets for which'` hsy are unable to Pay t� +1 leas to arent, imprisonments and lora Of employment or sm'stimes ' i inability to gain employment* SiuP1Y s tated# the Bayo-Vista residentso are not adequately served i ! i ems that are available in Contra oosla by the transportation syst _ 1 a are poorly served because Of three main factor81" County• Thay (1� a poorly or not ierved at all Low income a (2) Th*Y flus in a are ansit# (3) They are confronted by a transportation network ; by public tt ivate j and facilities strongly oriented toward the p sutmwbile• s t ' iwrthermores these problems interact with one another dna in so doing r !; further augment the transportation difficulties of the Bayo-Vista. , residento• 1.P no means are the difficulties with existing transportation systems f 1 r the eiderly� �£ confined to the Bayo-Vista Housing project. The poo M ` and handicapped of Rodeo# Port t�oatAN Crockett also suffer isa� swN , O! the saws difficulties• �. M' 277 >'ar' w`#�. L�,rttlTSf J { f e...iri'r� t ytat ,�t et ,�, r1i r} o fc.ixet ...� � .-. 1 f i i r t d..�.`'Y ' � ' "`,...t , .•d..rcL' ,'ri�c,?vs ,_,.,.at. ..r-..r. ii r i YI. GDOGRAPHICALlOKBTCH f '1. A. Rodeo consists of 580 cores with • '- population of 5#300. It is located approximately 40 miles to the northeast of Ban tranoisoo. The area is surrounded by anion oil Refinery on the � .. Bast, Ban Pablo lay to the westip Carquines strrIits to the north and interstate 80 to the South• The ' population breakdown IN about 1% Asian# 8.2% Blacks# 1.8% Chicano, and 90% white. Most of the residents of the amity Of Rodeo are either ern- ployed by union oil or are on some form of public assistance. e. 13RVICB 1�R The service area of the mini-bas transportation system is in the cotnrnunity of the Bayo•Vistao Which is a public housing project in •T} the city Of Rodeo. There are 250 families, population of 940 1n the Bayo-.Vista project. This is roughly 25% of the total i Population of the City of Rodeo. Rodeo it unincorporated and Transportation# Healthy Polices Pireo and other social-public ` services are provided� P by the county of contra Costa. Having i no municipal resvloe& 00cial•eoonomio problem bsom unru% unto able C, MHASMIMMICS 01 Th2I , Raw-vest S1 IM left According to the 1970 census there are 940 people in Bayo. i Vista housing Pro,Oot. This number includes the l0llOW1U g Prcp. i • j portions--- 36 elderlyp 326 adults# $76 childreng total popu.• L lotion 940. The racial breakdown of the say*-Vista Housing PXOject differs ! considerable fits that o! the total �. � population o! the City of codec. whites "kewp the largest pe r--osnt o! a pop�ti tlea »0 z m to .t• try M.r w r �t ]£' "T11:1 y ,X . a t r 60.31 $lacks 125 or 32%s Chicano 38 or 6%, and Asian 13 or 1.7%o Indian? I Statistics that I have been able to gather mricerning Income levels j Indicate that Dayo-Vista tenants are in a precarious state* Approximately ,40 per cant of the tenants still gain thoir major I' source of income from employment. The overwhelming proportion � of the tenants# however# are dependent upon some form of Public Assistance• welfare# and some social security, xnaome breakdown) 70% under ;50,0009 22% $5#000 to $0@000. Public assistance breakdowns a; los totally Disabled, 70 old aged 227 ABDC# 62 medical (no cash) 29 lova stamps (no cash) 407 cape&. Yneluded in the appendix Is an extensive Social Roonomice veographical s, and tiistarical view of the city of Rodeo t and Mayo- Vista Itousing project• r Li 42 tv "t If tY a '1 ) N i1 :';"1'f 131'1f f•at P U.p, 1 tl v M Pf t t .� `,l rx:: ( ° n•l�.Y�F�� v.Cr 'k .N! , srJ t;! y ;S •,r Sk it`�r1'-:�, 7���"ti' i t < .:: � �, . ' t. ' �. ,u a , •f.', . . r, h. � f t .''r t, s .. . ,. r 1 1,, r� gg � s,. i Secretary Of Trans portatione John A• polpe, recently said$ "NO cannot solve the Notion's social Problems by solving its transportation problems alone, on the other hand, until we till the nation's transportation needs. It will be difficult to re. solve many of our socialN N x problems. Bbr the poor# the need for aobility means broadening and inter• jj 4 silying the Tanga of alternoti,ws available in tuns of annrsased I { living standard and improve lifestyle• Transportation ' po tation is one Of the keys to opening the door to these alternatives. Without I n it, none of the other needs of the poor can be ratict- The frequency of the trans portatf as a maJor problem of the poore was one Ot the zancianys tnnc i out of the report made by the presidents' National advisory "'lesion on urban and Rural poverty. (1967) In Borne of the target areas trap• station a ` i po ppears# indeed, k Ito be a maJor problem, not only y good► but health and radical care# urch attendance j shcultural activities, recreation I i and social contacts depend ana : '. dquate transportation facilities. •� Given ,the Psydhologlealt physical, social, and in"o barriers !awing the poor& _(Baw.•yis a► tanente�) ti providing wore f opportunit/ws to the poor for improving thei r life-style is like! to fail if sow fora of coordinated transportation in not avail. able to • without transportation they are not even able to obtain the servicer that are Supposed to help then$ and their. probiews are aggravated. ( � 1 Passenger MacLean acLean Transit associationAugust I w� ._ a Au gust ZA�1f70e0i � G+tr s y,• r T t z "P. yt r{fj"•ttytynS*"C' ^',i"!•#� fo'j+h•ti5t ,.h[y,�.' 4 r` fS r y r iL. r w -'3 y `,: . ' s - tl i + { ,'� k • .ati a 4t j.., i rt Y S� .. .. .... ... .. ... 3, .x... x 4.. . ,(..,? • ,t .,(tFh„,h r, {` r,:tx�� .�t �;'} rS f. t r^�x, r'•4 rZ 4 f>y � �zY�L-.:r 4 F • •' � , � rv�tu WH t The relative inaccesibly of public transporation virtually , �.z 44 inearc"rates the poor (;1ft 2 Vi,gtnTenta�)s The availablity of 1 . , transporation incourages activity and expands alternatives j the i rf lack of transporation limits the perspectives and ppportUnitiss available to inAividualse Yt limits their capacity to Mork and therby maintain some economic indep9ndencee It restricts their ;{ i ability to maintain contact with others# and it is not surprising that the poor feel a heightened sons* of isolations The parr perceive the loss of transporation as a loss in nwbilityo and i they do not differ from any other class group in recognising that their mobility A»terrmines the quality of their exstenc*s "The lack of appropriate tranaporation constric=ts the life (j I ,7 i• space of any person, limits capacity for self maintennnoeo restrict* his aetivites and his contacts with other peoplao and may eontributs•,' to his dieenga+gesnent or alienation from soei*tyv and his experienc=e y atwrnie7 3 " <' THE apBClp'IC DESTINAMN90 Transporation to Nhero Lack of transporation keeps the poor (NaywVista Tentants) f J?k fm m shopping at shopping venters so they could take advantage of j eft lover process They have to buy frois neighborhood stores and drugs I ,, stores which charge more for their product and thereby the sreall amount of their incomes cannot •be stretched to full advantages Lack of transporation also keeps them from going to city and county health clinics for doctor and medications at a reduced costs A i large proportion of the psopl�� who peed surplus commodities are unaMe ;? f ;c to receive then because they cannot get back and forth to ths, i distribution points. i 4 1 evolution procedures for Poverty Transporation projeatso p*eMrod for urban mass transporation a8minstration►e my jbhn L. Craf$ i. ataatbrd Ressuck Institute• ! _ �� M,y}-^v Fns;t flrI ts'n*f^e fi k n v t r47a nt t .�". 'yK"� �fh to v't *�ri, n v+t <i waf ,y at•,, V7 !"- ,i �rirL yf, A t I � • RR r Ron=& p�t+d dear t3o4114 +uf v +is Axes � a .x 1 "oct coni Improve the physicalo 60*Wmical and social well being* of + the tenants residing in ]Bayo-Vista housing pxdjsc*o within the city of Rodeo# Calit• ' A. Eliminate the isolation eg the AayorVista tenank* tmu% the i rest of the Contra costa County, ' X Ss increase the Mobility of the HAy+o•viste tenants• , Co xnerease "Is range Of their lits Options♦ D• ImprcvA and increase Haya-Vlpta tenants aaceaisa.bIlity t•.o � all county r,grv10e01"MIth, welfare program*# oounsnlin gr vent)o to prov449 tz"asrortAtion ftr the nay -vista tenants to enable 1F three to tkka plantago of all cultttaal# and recreational taoilities In the county ; F'. Provide tran*portation 90s the Bs h yo�Vists tenants to slap. , ping fa«:Mtlens a, incrsoee the mobility of those %bo do not have ses*enable access to alternative lbxro* of trandportation, with special i attention to such } 4sou►Pn as the poor# the olds ani the 1u+nc9i» cappedo `A IN envelop A tranoportation notkjork in the p ayo_Vi,sta houning -r Project that Can tie in whiff the O*Mty tran*its and ftrt systems 'h P)' Y. Prrn►ide emnr+gsncy transportation to neatth services s .,N "Nw.n,rr x.na.+YN•ref#�<.'K. *r4 d^' s f.mz . - - .. '+�`- r ,.ttstr._�sl�t Y ;r•, i f IM- Rincrint i,on of Activit ten, f The Bayo-Vista mini-bus project will provide tree 24 hour County Nide transporation syntomp with link-ups to County and hart transit system. The trarisporation system will consit of lour wini• buses with a capacity for fifteen people# with the center being located in the Dayo-Vista housing projects The mini-buses will b© used to tz•ai'snort Bayo-Vista tenants to and from county service center# Health and shopping facilities, In addition the transportation eustem will be un©d to improve the mobility odfbhs Bayo-Vista tenants by inereasesinq their access to commercial, health, recreational and other community# and County j facilities. The needs, interests and wishes of the Uayo-Vista tonants, i both as they relate to this program* as well as other programs that the county provides for the Dayo-Vista tenants are ascort- alned through existing outreach programs. Tho. contiusd dependence j .A upon *mmunity and county aide and reprenentativese referrals from the County service agencies, other organization concered with the Bayo-Vista tenants problems will play a significant role ? ' In assuring that we are responive to the needs and desires of i the Dayo-Vista tenants. The only requirement demaned of project participants is that + t they be a tenant of the Bayo-Vista housing projects Information i + about the project will be dissemina►tod to the community through 1 newsletters, filorse mass media, churches# organisations aoncered i with the problems Bayo-Vista tenants, and County servic=e center t f ;; :'T.d,: sv...*7 1 !'.01+5Tn.9�i?.1.1�1 x•`..yr,he v ,yr wF`4ger !ru't •�k roK fitly- ;ti+i..a. .}'f-,wti s�.+'."h'aay.n T rWJ{ � •b ��� t �"" � '��-T,z •At'1�t d�hYa�ryl+s f.' t �'r c• 3 i � ' � dal i� t br� � � 7 1 1 rx!t a ;`} t;. 4 F -•;- ;i ;�� t a rry4( j 1{�ti `� t.: '[ � IV. Project Administrations 1. AdminiaterinaAce ncy�i i A. The Bayo-Vista Mini-Bus transportation will be operated by the Bayo-Vista tenants Council Oo rporation. The Council will establish the policy# and Mork jointly with the project Directory in planning+ � . evaluation, and monitoring of the project. Also selection of the Project staffs will be shared jointly Kith the Council and projeat Director. i, Z. tale Diractor� •. The Duties and responsibility of the Director# are the day-to-day management of the projects supervision and overall responsibility of the project statf and services. The Project Director will work very closely with the Aayo•Vista tenants Council, in Implementing policy direction. Requirements# l. .oneear mane rial a yin , � experiences or equivalent e4uoational 2 resi4ents of sayo.*Vista Housing Ps+o jest �'' �4p .i,4iF{'... 4 r ;g �'r7, 41 i�- r• 1. 12teRatcheic he Bowie runctionst , Responsible for,maintalning driving mileage and accident j recordsH setting up# organising and coordinating driverso sdheA"1e80 Assign drivers and dispatch as needed• Ooordinating driver I activities in conjunction with project director* May be called j t, upon to perform other duties as assigned sudh ase tiequire+�ente� � �� Must be able to operate equipment and haw some elerloal r ifs and ability to think clearly. i Z• esidentsof Dayo•Vlsta Housing pro of 1 I 4* Driver °y 1 i + As I Davie Hwnctionse j Drive bus# and fill out trip purpose foga, t , h 1 ' j � Requiran®nts� , 2 j� If 18 to 55 years old J^i y µ 2s Valid California Driver's license { I 3s able to operate equipment , 4 s sesident,o! eayo•Vista Housing OY+o sot f � r j•y �:H �i1= IF r 'r•.. r ygarh,,ry• �11•N:411!Hw�a �nrys} 'nr•n .y +..,ary '"M••q'1 1n•..r m+•}r•• ,v • ,, , ,,. -' ' J �� .� - ' .li j. � ., Jt , f t ?! �. :'� »r• � ..Y �;U4j 1�• t+ r:•.�_"`Ot�"*1Mti+) �yy i �f' , ' Ya.,�'tre�,e+r.r•;pr++.J ��#J'�"�!'�'"1 t 't'r�'•7'Y �l�'^'*++{a' w�;r+uw�••t!'`tPC p^ t - � + . �� . .., - ,{: ..... _ 5,' .-._. .. 4 rt.. ? •_ .fir .. .fr ,,.. . - � , OP�H_Rl►TEN—TW A ELI AMUITNU A) Develop stat! Job deearipliOtlr••••�•••••r••••••••••••• let b) !lend cmt Job announcwmYnto•••r+••.••r•••.••.•••r.rtoo* loot f I d) Screen r••••••••••r•r•••••••••••• lot D) Select personnel ••• ••••••••••••.••••.•.••••••••••••• lot I " e) Order wdni+buses and equlpimm tog*•••.goo••••••0•r•e••• le! 1) Orient and train stat• .•s•r•.,,••�•••••r•.•...•...••• and O) Develop bus adhodulos and t+oulerr.•••••••••••.•• • ••••• lot.&2nd R) Dw!rlo ' 'n p operating procedures and terms.•.•.•..�•.• r•.,,,,Znd " I) Coordination with public trent rtation oe `` - , po znriee•.••••• end 'Y •T) Operate pro'art•••••••�r•••••••••.•••r•••••••••r.••••�. �Bd+llth i R) Develop nownd year plat based on lot action year w"rience and e�ala►tion•���••�••••�••••••••••••••••• 10tH t i, i ;R 4, it 'y A }�t.. ` i t' ro. •,*�- �"`P 4 f) �i.�"6'a } i,k��+'�A��,r.Wcry '�M,'N` y S a TS t ` i BVU(iF.T_ #OR PAj2-Vx R MINZ•B VS MMSPOMAMOM URI M man 4 is-seat mini ban 0 $S@000 eadh•••••e•••••• =209000900 A 2-rway radio system fhr Naini buses• ($137 oadh and antenna a $15 oadh)••••••••••••,•••„• 768000 , 1 Bas• antenna 2-way radio syptemeoeo•••••.• S 30.00 r i � 1 trout Direrhos•�•��••••••�••�••••�••••�• 1100000.00 ''. 7 nus operators (46tu11 time at 4600.00 per `r � w month for 12 months) 0 half-time at 000.00 par month for 12 months niglht,+shift)• $390400000 } 1 Dispatdher (670/moo for 11 months) •.•••e•• 0 00040.00 Fringe benefits (15%)�.••••�••••�••••••••• 't� �206 00 a= 1 urban vonsultento•••• ••••••.•••••• •••••••••o 3#000.00 (Travel allotment for mini-buses) (Up-keep and repeirs) ..•.•.•.•..••••••...• 4 (11#/Mile x 50000 miles/moo x 11 moo* x 4 mini buses)••••••••••�••�•••••••r••••••••• $226000000 ' f ,,,;,,-Insurance (X651.50 1 yr* is 4 mini bus)•••• S 34116.00 i Total ti xz}3f W , r � ' 1 ..3. 13 r✓ Y'". + ?t � {'.' i i s fe, w '" Da&i !y'1 t,i+,sh'�d �r5 t;si.!�rvfa;{�r � a., c t� s :.Y. r {�, L.^' 11 7*c3 '�i � �'c � •+..�. ;- t s. N s � >. r iY. �-k t�<1=*. SS # d! } ���.. ,,,.f . :.�.....;,,.:�,.:. 3'r.-. i�_•�::.�.r. '�.�..:r..},�� �.e.;: r ,t ,•'Yr ,,r.,t�x*.y� r � ;„';;.%;,fid `.} '� 4+ - t,i3�.:r.�v t �., � .._ d, ;'.t4�:'r.K�t�+�. .r 1 �. r tk_ I P_RO(iR11M P.V11�r�1`,mION$ r A. TIenenortation Svs emI I A weakly log Of the following informationp taken ta" r' Passenger surrey table no* 1 1• Numbers of tris made P by bus• j 2• purpose of each trips 3• Number Of passengers each trip• i ( 1 4. Origin of trip, �• Dastination of trip. This date will be analysed to assess the effaotiwness of the transportation system from centers The intOtmation Mould indicate where possible changes I I in priority for use of the mint•buses may bep Ltethe systems as a whole meets the expressed needs of the tenants of fF, Bayo-Vista Housing project# and whether or not certain areas Of the city of Rodeo. port Costa ! s . and Csbckett can use the same type system and services It*.MDITItIO„PROC DUatrg� The rInance Department of the Contra costa County will be responsible for the financial records and transactions of the L project• The Auditor•• office wilt provide the audit of the i PtO ject in accord with proscribed CDURty Auditing procedures• ' 13 r :: ' h. Sp4 � 1Y'•wSGWI`'.'S 7J Ct;' d};ij� �^+ - 't l t , ,lY.`S•• �rr���Nt�i,��y�y�, �y'l , . a. .:.,v.• 1. ".. .._:/ 't.t'11��eri K,r ct {S+ rr � d3f k Y' +`t,4d s •^ts -b'l . > _ i � v 1 , ti. fs �, TABLt .1 Trip Orin 0-in Orout Not Purpose D-�__._ Traffic Across t _...?'4ta1_..._... .. Project Area Did not indicate i Seek { Employment i r Work Recreation. 1 Medical Stopping ' School Total5:1i k. nuor g n Ins s Pmjoct area i o-outworigin outside Project area D-inaDestination inside Project area D-out•Destination outside Project area I I .rR r0 f .qf { 14 { it"` 1 ..f.y i tln M)•t, L �S1.1C•�,t ,� kfi 4 p T! J�4^ � 'Jtl V ds y......p,�t �'� .1�`ML��y�,1.4Lyf�y'� .t _:�� I`)}S"`�•El`"f)"` � s�� � •,-I'^Y^t.�`S�1 4 7tt (i rt �i3.; ti t't, r.. a•,?�,r .'�'Ri� .�i( ��< is•+ rr���t 'bf ji z� � F t ,� r-' �� �.r ,� �i�d•�'i�r���'�t;� ,�( � }ti t � r +f."'��d� I 1 r r "MT-nmap . This d � emanstration project is significant and i f significant because it Will den+onsttate that transporation bring about the mobile necess of poverty, a r'Y for the Poor* to rise beyond the love, The project it i y sPortant for a number Of •cher reasons as Well. 2 1q of them deserve to be pointed out. i 2t will pmvid. an extremely useful record of experience With several means o! providing public transportation for the Purpose of x .obs and essential service. Second , . . e and most important it Will L`re' emphasize that it is urgent 1A, to give now consideration to the location of those eat { r nary to Improve the ivities newer• I living conditions of the inhabitants new in the Poverty pockets of our metropolitan rag, ons health service educational faailiter ` • market for r cbnetnnsr 9oods� recreation sites, as + well as Job*)* A high degree of mobility for the of t" more affluent ! t Population hes wade possible an urban Pattsrn aharaeterited by a Wide dispersion and range of edylov in these soeloeeonon�ia aeitivities* mut and other �s Y of the ersential aatiVites are Act 1 Within the range Of access Of people in the •' eY area at feasible 10"19 Of transport service. An Important ' be learn from this PrOJOct is that lesson that ash activity location hand With the kind and level of goes had ih : transportation that is capable Of being realised and wrtained. Attention must be ti giving the r locational as � Peots os essential activities as well as : the mean m! transport to trach them• 0 AT 3 jr,�` � ti r • ( I ' i ` w Given the psydhologicml, phyictnl j eool.nlw ecelpInnia berries -; that the poor ("yo-Vista tennnts) face, plus whin the» conditions aro } oumbinod with the lack of public transportation within or out of , : � the PAya-V$.sta tadeo arra 1 one begins to understand why tayo-Vistd residents in the tcid"t of a highly industxielxed and increasingly m4mricalisod omnty, hove tails toshavo in the emmmie gxOwth that has aoeo on in Contra cbstm county, j . f ' r ya �S ,ZZ^_ I 3 i I i Gixx3]; Y ( r, t t . . a R.? }u Fr.,:=: .i >.iv2 ).a.:.r. .''isA�a,.Y&�Fi>ki�y .�a j�lx y�,,l,+fb s. q.• , F ♦ ` i 1 -mmatell SUM t They nrmpla ae• a rMSOW R mplinvo The raddow sampling c gyres Awe to the tile" invole in training the lntervimrorl willingness j and anwillin Goer interviews of the temonts to be � I ea peoleily of harinci the tenants to give their namecs, and talk into tape K"corder• it LUM + n r The lata rvimpers were not salaeteete they were Maltmteers i lnterviSWrse male femalel about fifty five years old. The interviewares j ware► given a taps, recorder# send out as o to ml and was told to { interview anybody and everybody in the 0e1yo•Vista Housing Pro j".., that was Milling to give a stotment an the need for transportation i•r In the Mayc+-Viet:n Housing Project• J• The Pecorder rntervimm 9,mrs play"4 bacOt a and typ*d the leo♦ t. i of the AA}aVleta tenantel in the exact manner and wordage an they f I wete recorded• There were no alterations, or editing of the recorded i Interviews) reason beingl the respondents ask that their statment not to be dhange in order to show their true feelings and tmeel" a I about the ROW !br transportation )bar Sayo-Vieta tenants. � ,t t z r , .+i•;t <i r e��`�+�4'VrO�.�'"'1ng ...�'�s +'=�y'r`d�nh• a {cr+"'{f►dI'lry �vro� t -.r �r+��{ i ,' +r _ i f t 5 ♦ F'+L yyl"t�F�+�'�+J" ��.�.. ;5� fr{ r a xy tL ,t� xr �: 1y}14! '+ t 2 r , ! �C'-1 jf �tx> t��i/'�`1 '+r t 14i�> > >43c +�� 3 r t l i, - v.X�.4 +.'�tX� Y{��Fs J�# d 4 '�`' ,. Y ,�;• ' rr t ,i'#o` �.{Yma.�-0 , A t a , 1 ! �. r -1 r 1• nbt� hnr.�aait�l:e� T.nc. ].9Ga. T��^.VA?. I1nxx�.eat"nt T�rr..nnpnrt:rthl.on i NeeAs of Handicapped• combridger Ma96acdhu9ett8o U Ci rs f!° t3 entt. 1969• Final report Z• City ootorefiester planning Doparbn 7 rr►nr+�x�rtant:ir�n >7�+t�aoea� i,ravorty PoCkOt:n tu'!.A F.rlOnYm#mh centers Dorchester• i president•e National Advioory canaission on Rural psoverty• MI(VIO n"I" P(xipl!, I.-D: no-bind" vtnnhingI4nr D.C. Volpe f, (Rmot, printing OffiCOs .' 49 Tranaportation Researdh institutep carnegie-Mallon Univer- nit:y 196% r atortt n,t,,vutn for turban -.rnn"POrt.n+:ton. R%ort prepared for the Dept* of Housing and Urben DeveaiPMMt• PittUTAIrgho 59 U68• vapartmant: Of Flnu51ng and T1rlinn ratolnr-mnnt. 'tgBA• T4'+ tetorroa•s Transpottation• lava System for the Urban Future WaslAngton D•C. U.9. Covet• printing office. 8. U•$* Urt) n »opnxt�lanl: of Tx�.�trtlwxt:�ttot�. 390so Cc�etie and Objaotivees problems programs and priorities• flownMdus frt,rn thcz ;orsoL•Ury of trangl"ratArmv nlinn a, rnyd• Nashingtont D•Ce 1� O•s• Urban glass Transportation �►dntinstration• u.8• Dept• o� �rl:nau,ortbta.�m�ilvie90Psioritess*and c,eo�ia► or CP ital Grants object • "< a (xntornol %TTAPanerte) {T <.r WA ` rrt �ty'+'4M1;� sk r �5 •CiSptwsn rr +,`igt' tNayyy 44a�{5t•.�,y f f{ 'i V j J c l ? : :h<,t 9 3i e'> ,t • 1 4d a i•,ti i ar, r n dt !u `,4 in pz�t [ : n, � u f.� COAL A GOAL A: CARJINEZ COACT 10N o establish a Carauine:,, Coalition as the central representa- tion orgariizatioii fur the reaiderits of Rodeo, Crockett and- Port costa ( tracts `>1-5f3). Purpose: (1 ) AtO. as the governing or advisory board, for any % f1ed.cral,state, or county funds to organisation and aC-onx. es providing services for the resi- dents of the Coalition Communities. (2) Act as a vehicle fol- the residents of the roalitioii to address themselves to their coffiiixtriity problems and needs. (3) 'Provide the opportunity for the residents of tracts 57-50 to voice their interest,concern, and opposition in regard to what type of program are to come into their community. (4) Provide a vehicle through which the residents of tract 57-58 can work with all agencies and institutions in solving community problems. (5) Act as a local organization for residents of tracts 57-5S to Darticipate in determining the future growth of their communities. Problems, Objectives and Bonefitat. ( 1) Know locale form of government to represent the people. Know locale law inforcers. Kr)ow local transportation system. (4) Know recreation facilities or activities for young adults and youth or adults. (5) Know agencies or organizations working on behalf of the grovith and improvement of their community. Objectives: 0 Develop an org'a.nization with a cross rection of community leaders from all three communities of the Carquinez Coalition. (21 provide the residents with the, opportunity to serve on a committee dealing with some of the problems of their community. , n+�k�Sa COAL B •aq3 ZAiF.�.n..f4 .. ._. ..Sr t.1 ., ._ ,. .. t. .. �. r.r �i. .... Y .. 1 ... ... .,. ... _ GOAL B: CARQU1REZ CUALITION Establish a community agency with staff capable of dealing with the needis and problems of each community of the Carquinez Coalition. I Nrvose: (1 ) Research and evaluate the social needs of each Community. 2_1 To organize and develop the Garquirez Coalition Roard into a urganized group capal)lcr of seeking and raising funds to meet the social needs of their communities. (3) To ori:anize acid set 'up a Coauiunity Action Board to apt as the administrating and governing board. to the Co=unity Action agency. (4) To organize ant]. establish the Carquinez Coalition Board as the central and local organization working IfOr better way of life$ to work toward the improvement of educationj employment, health, housing and recreation. (5) To house and work with the young adults and youth of the Coalition to develop recreational facilities and activities, and develop programs to me»t U-io social and other needs of young adults and youth. Problems Objectives and 13enefits: ( 1 ) Know Community Agency to deal with growth and development of each city. (2) Know Agency set-up to provide recreation for the young adults or youth. (3) Know Agency- set-up tolmeet the social needs of each community. Know Agency set-up to provide the community with information on where and how to seek funds to meet the needs of the resident of their own community. Know local agency set-up to protect each cowiluxii ty from,'crime and-d6linqueficyi, Objective: (1 7levelop an agency With q• ste.f f capable of seeking funds to meet the reeds of the communities of the Coalition. (z) Develop an agency with a staff capable of getting outside agency to holo solve the problems and meet the needs of each comretinity. is .......:.: GOAL C I�Mawnlr GOAL C: C.MIH; INEZ COALITION Establish a Carquinez Young Adults (18 and over) and Youth ('17 and under) Council. %rpoue: (1 ) Act as the governing board for both young adults and youth residing in tracts 57-58 (2) 'Provide the opportunity for youth to work adult agencies and institutions in developing youth programs. (3) Provide youth the opportunity to work with adults, agencies and institutions in colving communities problems. (4) Provide youth the opportunity to develop* recreation, education, social and other programs and activities. (5) Provide the opportunity for both young adults and youth to work with a(!%ilts, agencies and institutions to developVj crime and delinquency prevention programs. ]'.rob].ows: ( i) 'the lack of recreational facilities and activities for youth residing in the com- munities of the Coalition. (2) 'Me lack of culture and education program: for youth residing in the communities of the Coalition. The lack of opportunity for youth to voice their views and concerns of the problems youth have with different institutions and agencies in their particular city The lack of effective dealing with problems of young adults and youth by adult institutions and .agencies of the county, city and or com- f (�) The lack of opportunity for youth to developW -nd operate youth-run programs in their community. (v) The lack of opportunity for youth to learn about coren:urai ty, city curd county government. Ob.iective; 1) The ,,arquinez Con.litiori Youth Council will work with the leaders from each community to develope them into an organized group of young community leaders. (2) 'flee Carquinez Coalition Youth Council will establish an adult advisory board as needed to work with the youth councils. it is the hope ofthe youth that the adults advisory board would act more as ari advisor than as a policy-making board to the youth. (31 The Carquinez:, Coalition Youth Council will be work.in tvi'tli as many different institutions and aguncies in the county ;:i.::d each community. (4) The. Carquinez Coalition Youth Council will e:siah.Licl; s"Kill centers to increase the level of skills acquired b;,r youth in schac;l. By doi,16 this, employment may increase amourg young 'oun4 adults and youth. Apprenticed:ig enrol-will increase. Job readiness clas:.es and workshops will lnc.re:ase. Benel'i L: (1) 'Through the development of youth leaders in the conmiunity, youth will be able to voice their con:.err:s to i.ns L� . Lions acid agencit.s wi•tl:'n their coix,iu,iti,us in an organized manner, Aich will brines about meaningful changes for the youth. (2) With the adult encouraging; stronger yoa.th involve- ment, the Carquinez Coalition Youth Commission could become a model for other youth groups. A direct result of -the involvement of youth in planning and decision-making will be the closing of the com- munication gap between youth and adults. ...., a .. ... .s ., .. ... .. .. .. t..' .:.•.. '.t.t "i.':` '!" ...,.... . . 5 .. .: . . . ..,... . ..:::: -...• a .,:'' M�111��SA�lt�: � ^ ��,?t'�}�',;� z y si't(d4' ,. ,f,�x,'vS �L H'#s�a' °.° &.k Y r 11 yj ,, r� xi�dr ,�'f t tia�,y.. Y,{kn 'r ..";; ,i x�'i �'lr�x.. r s, i.{,�`� '�s "i' d g>, °s d x rY ,++ ,� .„;�. ` r'zw ,�' i ft 7Y t y,,, 1.„s.. 3 I s Y 2 `� w ,a "' r Atl' ,f !. dP..,.. ,;.,: .. :.,<� S s : t �:t,,, s. :M"—`,-.,. t),z' .. td .�h o .:?. x a`t�t dirt of . .u < r 1 t r ref a e ac t s z, e } ,. c z tT i'' 7 fFiy t v , f sri/.t�. t!; •rl6{ f}s e dti r°�',.tr '" -'J t "+ tr-c?&F f'. 1f N� t{t ,q�'z 1$•'S #r r� f r Y , r zi r t C:. 5 �j= + F id it f i. i t T 1 t '.,. ?,{t it '!t i y r s,r t X'� YT, y t.-. L a t 1 i t S t, t �.- t 1 3' f t{ xy L. �'} e,}F r+,�' y�.! k*i w a; r t r r t ft r - r' j �.I I I- .� �',�, .,:-, . . ., ."- I '_�:,," , ,-- I ;��I-,—"- -�-,-,-��. 1: — ^;i+4 -1 I n j`t, :anti }k', yr4 S r ° _ �am yzt i dT {,.� f. r i J4f 5 t .J 'f�Me�(1* t�� 1 . R. rr r' S4. tt :i td li,i. `)t'7 ,ri Cy: TL{y t]1'is�.ry r: i^x t + .ai -S. z J ! U> a s7 l+Qw� �iyt{ r� + t''QPM ► y 1N ,(- y^ ( .� I tl`�S xtt t r C(,�( �i{}'�f -•, r{y� � r .r r x '�i r r ` O. �x} lii� r s -11 '. rtt kr,�$�j /�,� " "I 1' i ' Y k,,J 1 y r a E,/,'t> rt t ���yy�� K - � I 'Y2Yz'�SFf 1! + - - i +r�`+a"' +..r+.....�....c.y t -r�-4 1,t j ww.swr.Mn,t.��y,w�+wvwn� ►ewr�r.� 1. +r• y } . t I UP' Ti#}rlj Y.i ' .l`�.t �.J.7r .L 1, J7i?�J(} LZ�1+ UtJ,,�� �l .ij Yc4 r� 'Ar.3 ` , t' -'T+. fi+..t.. x`-,1l `� n. ,} �}} ,`:5�t ( i, y ,,,,�-tt 15' r •i t .{ wt§ 1 r C! !� � •� \I 9S' 3,�'.x.:v{� "s, dF VNf ifV W�'lj' �1. wL.{'� i�, �f�'�eY44 i I. t trr> 'Y.ill i'at ? 41i• lrAiJ.it i� t,•1 4'r}r'� Gv�' ( r~ -1 Ir1. ' ' ',, .�4r It Y,rN } , + aRelt� +�.�. �J—Only l•Y•�4s' t.P,(,+�./ ' . + r 7 t s. » ,1 ' �y {'Y' {t{ ; +� e�yy yy�� i t1 � �t� � � far j ' {�LC?{� is - I § y �. / ,�Wt0. M� 7Yc�Ja , 't t > ,: �i#'lj+n:# r a!>s t,+ r {+a 3t :rf yh`. t t t i {. i �,t 4 ' dS '' lryf tax t b z} ,l tr{ � il iti :'n S t I ', d r' , ,' f tx tzr 1d b r$ - t6 1 A i'Yr �" u '' b� w. s�jgd a r,.+S dry S '}� } 1 y t'r� .}� SN a ,,_ a } 1 a i t sz , c i}., .t�SF'�4W i3"ti[iL.i F ,1d6 �i.M� .,r++.�..y�.t 4 r� �M V t t t t{t(y� �6 t d } L 1•}�, .;yt' 1 +. t b { y ? Pf"'l 7 Lf t } o('3+�'J ti V i s rj LLtr ii;{r ,.f1p ,.. �t s y1Y ly �12 +�{;, ��yy'/�"#�}1 + ti'j� i fs ..,tt,Sri t.( ♦ t",, r 4 y .r'4'e "k t" d .,,� 1 4 z r fq r' sa c 3 y j. G��,M,f lPl�(1 �+ rX t Yt> '�5:. �' i},-,iiOf u,'o ,.4•. " yy��, >=Cs w t`ry s'p n t xz -! � t V�#�" Y'�. t� 1 kh` } $ t� §C?�y:� 5i j ,it ' i J.e 'i� ';x a �:� }ri lz9 S¢ A,i *r Pr,r fYl 7- M k t �x, r,}TJ'j s i S 1..rtej /�,�t r, �j{'{� + ��11 ^� �+ .x ,. r y, r] ,{ r. a.,,,x I::yp j�.t" tya,+� Tize t : t§F. --w-L f f t —t,"F Q" �,,'l ;O.; �r ff W "-C +� '.,(, t f�y+�r c , : T �~t 3y"+t uh. 2 d'", fyi'ir'f'a Z!f U T S. , :i s(G �° r '{r a ,r�rs Mtn f k q�. :� ' t. �.�u+ C 1 �'<r t �' -c` �' S��" 11 �t,{y�� fie` 1T ! `r` {, S Tc,��,t,4,ty td{rxyt f t 1J Sz, i!}: 1 *ay j �' �'y+?Z ` : a€.G�"" ati F;i 'c 1 t. h ,. '1s �}t�*�r ��' ('j� .} {`fit} �}y� rr�t t_ .>b e i f. 4., z t wti$ "' '�+" ak>Si."" Cyt y a.3 v.`' ,''s t{°l,�r•'rT< 7�+t_R11. 1&.,; t1I ,,. 17 V i rfZ4MJ�4 t*+t §r4 d Y. Y4+1i' k 4 x L'.. '` 'P ..1f.� #'IS �'St �Y. S} t.:,f lktt> 13k�=5t,'rx��'i S!2.si.2F'z+?jw{Eh�'hjtx' .urstSy3 r,34 a ,tc� i�,�t 4: iC y zb A yt' u x fan_ i 1.' 3 t ! t R -.-+L s r tjr 1�§ t. 4 7 a ?'l .ry zac r i i" a.`k H7 -x 43f �1z rs s T1 STT��i -1 ty (q�°L -.111. {L.: r s ? y k ee i'rt t fit, �c� t' \�° tt,,,° 'i. A iI 'e F'r 'S�1i Tk w '-, .{'"' 4'+.ri.'ttt ro'" ,ix� ft t�:a �.i1 i�.tJ.y Y C�,y '+` 1`' S b!.? i trw t4k dr t.. r fi e.'l d i 7 + jtJ i ._.itrt 1� `}0 1 ri .L' �x7kV>:,ii r A3 + t -n\ .x zF 7* ,�, (x `� , ^,+`t'�S ,0 -i4t fl ry.+S fkT 1�('ri �9tt 5.�,N�t +�t, rf', tJ �z r x tL t, t S iff"?tk{vref,� t t y zw r t 1G`' i'j Mf" [ 4d< a► ,} 7�is_ 3 Y L# ijj�} d1 z rd iz i �z Uz i d e :t t }t Q + q" s , r' tt s ' `:T�d^.as ji�r a 14 \ i ly r' j 5t::f a .z,.? 1 t .t i , t Ff iv �,ee. z 4 q n t t S ra cJ r is Fy �, �t t t �i F T i 1 1 i (. t 'h f l a F' K td S J t ! r i J 2 itr L , S � (7 f 1 c i' +,, r S > y S.P �'_ tifL > .� } ,,4 1} F t 4rt,y }` I'S",{h', tt F�x'�k�', 't,' Mrd arLi 4� x t,+i; x rr\. .t 's Pia t.c *'Ll -"-.fit^ i tr �'rt, 1 'z2 es �{,iy V{ tr.�J t.- ygN,;r Cq,r4T1 t"r t r.. qty t - ¢t x i F .� c 1 xs t.St, ,x ➢1r P S-qr{ ak*53 4; f4�'.. ,.i::t{f 1 { 1 k K. •4 /.v C 1 )-S S, f �r .1 ; .,X dy t l !S 7 t y�-5.{ f�`y >+,s ytr j i f Sye} y#,5.. It w e _t t {{R lE a- J ; t 1 Y t t n J" Ilkr,.* i 43 rt kt '<i i X� } i 17 ix4 t t2th r c r 5 t ;i} t l $. ; 7 x "T t 3; '' tY Sdz S C t'C ry ,i s. 's,F' c i .. t .�P .. p :.FY, _ } y b:{ t -i p ,{ °�dt T r k ., 4 e t it Ft' °} r+-r`,tsrt I-1r- x }4# .rpt x;t p ,4hr- 1n*, t ,,. k �- t 1 k -:i �-: +w i , ,5 ,.c- 3'�ti f t , t� ti 7"� ,} Pw,l=t vt ` f F7 -3 =}{., , M,. 1. r t ' t �..t r _ ist,dS Stt ! l,.J, j�,3- . �' �!'7#ir` h .t^yti1F t c}t.. i 'sr _.r,x , 1 is t > r. ,h{ t ht +4-f z ) x yt .4�1"2 y +:,Y{, „Yy'.,''533: � e# ti N ,� t fi t .,d t f t t c pf J Y_.°} r,trj S zs t�, �` � 4s .1 y :t n`ytY !? .. fy.,te �.':'� tv r d Y, v t'/ '-r '1 -.v m+,x c t x t, ...,T t c t? y rzt*t 1'>a.. y T, y r t s L .i t 2 a x t t7 It t y Sit s 1! i�,°'�rR ': 4x n+y dye t-,zk 'y k r-t y.,t,ri n r. s" t _ Ylri t � ? �t r t d it k2 _ t l t 7 t - 'r y �. t r t t.., x e ] t P ! `,` z'7 #tiT., r� t<t yf t rt i ;F rcidY 'r'K1C'r ' test s. x 1 x E i i t f t'k.,t t�` k '' r-r 1`„ d { x h,.t,y°ti1Y„ 11 ._ �`'+�� .} -.{ } at '-. --il4 r t ifY,t �;lrl-t` f W§4� •r.trz :'4r �F a•..i,t r. r �t s.~ rz tL , `•w"�'r„} ... t 't�'f F''Lfb :, t4 tet` �t� ";+':�' x''S're c ° 3 t ay i,tt,t^'• i74� 1 r.:f y i•4�,-�} s ' s$4 +,i "-s yt;r �`- tc_�% r, ' 1 { - v:}r -> ,4t 4• Y c... s ,,,IY. rt t: y x ..1 3ti r i Y� f w r S i F3 r z Y y .r Bx } r t, .,t`',+ 1, ti t :c c +y. r ail k t.ti r,.•�,.v t }} 's 7 r , tv -' ! +�, ' . .,W Y.. l..l �'�,t!f`r�. i r :tk;, 5 xz 21:r '.t,:t R rt #3 �.�:tit (t',,rlt' t r + ,r i k et fq, i i'tA e, .�- #?. k a! s }as, rk+>°�:•'+ Y ..v , ,;ii?M Jx +v.•'r 'tsF } t'S.tYij, r 1 2- 2ff� ' (, '�, s- t .''C, .t" i' .i 7 p z.. ,1 . k t`t t Y 7 g 'y i 1�Y' t l'. § !. 1. .S iE f 'S .._. T'1,��.y$ .'Ay x 4,`,'' fj f� 4cy. th•-§ t' �}'ry A ;1 k"`tly L.+yA t .T +i$L;.i+}'^Z ti,+Sh 'Ft 'f.:�l wx i i y1.- } ) t .ix t 4�. ' r....f �'' a ,�y z=;.P' z. t:� .rt ` �,«s'h;,. *!� n # ' -t }x �-i., .a �1et•5.^ '�S{r x. i ti, y "• 'y�n. t,+'y.. u ar of �r :kd < � Ex '>, ^ 4 a k t# r t h lf, yq k 'ti f z#' i 7 t', tl t :hh '7'.v, j' 3s :• k'-tyt <3 e y it'°. i es `-`n`Y'. "t 7 t b. ''',h;ws. .; jfly.a �w "r +,�3� � t t ��;L.. jt s r f ti, r r � -r � Nt" y : wt, y �t �( v��`_• t t aw >,�a =. `rrr'f ' S zh:S `�#G'`''zt 1., ;'"i.k"e ^..a'+ka .. g 'svit 4'+T' xt rt ��'. � t��xavn�.r�gwa rf+" ..l, �f+,J�. #"In aha���+tt��• �� L-t�k! e7�'� 5 n) 9 •' lI�rr, t ri .t .?R[i �fi:Y•'yl• .� % S,SAY.,i�fJ t a — s r fiw�� F� '1.�, -. f S� } .4 ;# `i. .1 Y 5 1��'-'J �i r`'eYl'•'J�y��� G y ���3. � t= i s t: � -t t :_ �d. r . �" hw t t .y, z 5 ,, '^C 7� ���2r'-• CLES O� CORPORATION � ;KAYO- VISTA TENANTS - _ COUNCT�:'CO i � - a REORj�TION of ►hr;"c`,;,,�0 secr,'e�; � �-tx� ••�., of S 'foA SEP ,L Jr F Secis t .y o f Y Jq�,yEs to f State : The� - p�P HAKRiS ' Jh ' E name of thiscorporation, shall be' DAYO� ,VISTA.,TEN ' COUNCIL' 'CORPORATION RATION. LN�S� LEDr e SEP 2 91971 Th put poses P .for which this . - - corporation .is formed -art The `� T PAASCH, County Crerk specific and NTF3A COSTA•COUIYTY P rimar Y Purposes .'are top ve'�StA7p through which f ' in e � .. gfctunon ., the Bayo 'Vista . rovide a c spot Housing Pro - discuss and analyze- = � � ]ect can discover, cC problems common to _ all tenatns a �. �• . solutions to ' � : , to develo these.. problems, ao� } increase u 4�� stand1ri ` � - ' P blic. awareness and under 4 of th r e problems and needs Of �the �, a r�• Housin tenants r f 9 .:Project, and to ,. in the Bayo Vista � ► ' provide a. channel of co }q�.,• ` , local . . ' j organizations. - cation wit .they . h o r � a and to work to � t: _ getlier with the- :betterment - these organizations toward of• tot r the al Rodeo r � 2 t The general Purposes .and powers 'are to Iife� in - , . improve t Yo to � qualit t r the � . ea Vis he Housing project and to standln . ; �• ;r}; g between the Ba O -: _ :Promote a better Y Vista,. Housin 5 Rodeo c g Probe t it r through :community act 8 neighbors lA � � � �, and = ion• ` � .� - 4r A TTT t r .corporation' is organized pursuant to :the � cot .. Potation law ofthe�,S � ': =::, general non'profit .; tat ' � { �. 4 a of, California IVkn. a,s 4i t The_ county yin •th. , is State`�where � r ` the p transact�on• of the business • ` � incipal office: F - for '..the "•� �� r� 1 = of this corporation is ', 'Costa County `located in Contra: L t # Y names and ,add sof � . nesse thee: •r `- �� f'` .,. M�. v capaclt , _ -; -: , persons who are to Y of a�rectors: u �- act in 'the r 8 ntll .. e selection 'of NAME:_ lr .SUCC@SiSO th the s rs + are �+ f SAD eburn. oristance 110-.ICalifoSt _ t � , f •y,; ,� � ;�, Kahn - �. ,.. -. . 11 _ _ . .. 2'.Calif : • � eo, Calif —_Zelma Davis S . orriia St_ , Rodeo, Carl f• � + 164 -Californi . , a St f. Rodeo, Cali :y.,.,,:, —.�".�.....,.�,•x 3..�� x 5 �..�.y��.T r.7�r rf�t �}Yy��.1.."4 �y "��}l��gcy.,.,"'arw+.r�.�y,� _ .t -r M���: .• ,z-^-: ,..r;,��� ,� �''�,�s•.��,,�.c it.i'f...t'�-�r"�.�y�:iY+"�� {r-'`r s,''t ,�:•�"'�y rt� 'w^��x,.+.3,r•�'r��� ,„r"' rp'' n'.-,`r,�. a3. �• - '".^.+,. �' y,. �.n'�' _4= �iy,.,*„ "�� �� � �,.�a` '�'� L��Y� � t"t t � �...9rSC� t...,,r`,�" " '2�f a S r� r.14 fir.; •, Y� �xt1 .. �,�- �''� r. � Yn- a�,.a�„ ,�.ysl r}c."'t:.a*^ +- ,FRa��r•�s.,•,;c,tc" ?�`".���,.pe. . f ,'+-.y =Y,� `•"* y�i"�2i ....c:.. '�� x..- ....,.. w "4•.�_ .rw'i.. ^s . ^^� .x `���-�i•h '��"�F.... ����# � r .^r+ P j� rp�j �t'•+��'�"+' . ti e . ..-., - 3'o-f�' ::4 '',t_r2M' ,>-�."s2n`3 uc �t T�.sx a.-.,•,tir,s rt'+"?- sir !M­,-,!.t,, r M / ala. i f -%t - of ^ .S`° w ,, r r l }'" s.Y,t� r!�5 Xtx �'Ae? } r'Z k r t -i <: _ J. r s r f r n, 1 a.yY'g [ : . , „i1. Y - Y �l` A rt Y jii .i . .$ � ,, :. 11 fk' rte` Some Mitchell 23 California St Rodeo, Calif r ` FlorencelAguilar 25 California St , Rodeo', Califr }11. T '} S.�1.1111 .3 .�. 122 California tf , Rodeo, Calif.. r Carol•Wilson k� Nettie Harvey 126 California St , ':Rodeo, Calif._ t . Lois Fierce 1218. Mari osa St. , Rodeo, Calif. t P'., .- Mary Harris � : 1321 Mariposa St. , Rodeo, Calif k Robert Gray = 1317 Tulhbee Ct. , Rodeo;, Calif y Velma .Henderson 113 Dempsey, Way, Rodeo, Cali ; , . , . -.. _, t �. VI. { ,__..,I.. r ... _ 9J z'�* Themembership of the; corporation shall,1. consist `of all Bayo . r in p '4' Vista '.Housin Project Tenants'. Each�-,member of :the corporation shall have; 1 lr 1 - „ - } 11, x ' the, power to ,case .one, vote in all •corporate elections and i'. all matters ,,. - ' r, ,. s r 4 , c f requiring membership approval: -Every member of the corporation shall` be i` Z, t 2 �c-: f, i.i n. ualified 'to serve as an `officer,' director, or chairman of a aor orate : F, f, q p - <;Tr : qualified to serve as `1.aI.n officer, ;director .or chairman of a corporate - _ ., h committee The affability .of the members to dues and assessment�11s: and ',the , ," .- ' '' method, of collection thereof,' shall �.be as set forth in the By laws. a 4 . x r �t _ , , r ti t r �r _ -11 VII• _ ; d I.- .-., .. ., _ i � r� i. The property.'of1­1 ..this corporation is irrevocably :aedcated K F 3 to charitable purposes •and no: part of the net income or' assets of this t` 3 ,, - _ r 1 a • ; x F i rr: �: r .. .. 11 R rr .{ ? r I ., `.. organization shall ever inure to the "benefit of any director:, officer t� t or member thereof or: to the benefit of any'; private 'persons. _ Upon the . �' 5 '• ;. dissolution.'or winding up of the corporati11-1­on its assets, remaining after r' `1 I 4 4 1 . payment, or'. prove s"ion for:.payment, .of 1.all debts andY liab> li i es of$ this f : t . ;, corporation shal11- l be organized and operated exclusively11£or charita1 . ble , _ - t _ j purposes and--which. has established its tax exemption status ':under r y }r I { F f Y. v S I Section 501,(16) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. 5 ' �` If this,:corporation holds; any•.assets In trust, or the corporationE { � '. V, t; s r ss:.1.foI 11 rmed` for charitable:purposes, such assets ; shall be d>_sposed ofsin annex' as ma be� directed by decree of the Superior Court of the .y !-"4_ ` suchen Y .. - 1 f' county 'iri which' the"corporaton has 'its principal office, upon petition ,-,. Ow" * :, therefor by the Attorney General or Uy any person concerned in the . �; liquidation, in `a proceeding to which the Attorney':General, is a party . , � . - M I 2. , . :.:.. ' ; .. .. ,. . ..—- �1 . . .. ;-- f= . <.:a .-. . �} �. r"f pµ. , - r . -1 -4 - - - .}.. 4.;. - - I 5 "..,wwx .t-.w 3.k -�z'�t w*� x a: ,I t?'r v( �? 's�, t"r.Fr A; Jti, ��T i i Ft•t. r} x � [ro _ r i'wt ii,`�i f } '�' u e ( 1'Z }_ Sri i,� / 't �'_ T tv+, -s't K 4" ..'t-t +�^e'3'-. ��. i .��� tri°e@s,1 ��r tt - • _ i. r t t _ (: � r�Y �i' _"ys .'.xb . tY letr ° -a ,k r sf .� m .tu,e - .k' -r s .tYr- h T` 4 ! l t { 1 {.G4 c^YS2 �i Ci '3 i 3 ' - i'_ t.s -i r .x r "4 ztt� • `i-:r{ - .: i . } i Y' t VIII• �, r;. ? } t t ,I - rti., ...fir, h J t t? 1 t = 3'a �u� � S.,Lt t '':' t N 9 t� The name of the unincorporated association which is' being Kj .:- .. - : ; is' .� s Zk } f :�,� ,�ncorporated is KAYO VISTA :TENANTS COUNCIL CORPORATION. z ...._ _ - L �. - .. .. • - - lr ; t� .ria .. .. _ _ Y-1: ..:.- .. . ..ti .Y. ..r'n , ..-.- ., q J 4 =t -y At 1 t . .): .'..:. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,.`we, ,the undersigned eleven; all; of whom 45 ix; t r '�4 ' , { ., . ,; -be>.ng persons named above as the first directors;; have executed these w Fa of Jul 1971. Articles of Incorporation the day Y• x /. `�/ / ter` n it f � ` ' �` `( CONSTANCE KAHN ,� �- f j,� 3 x HLRN HILLq ` ` r , 1 I _ '_ { �t r � _[ ,. L/-��•3 �{�,. iL ELL ,'' y its tom ' t SONIE MITCH `,lis fia< ?��*� ZELMA DAMS r n _ r -- t - r.i !f { f lx I`/ r: a x r kr of c yrs"' t 6?}ar s,�.i' f x. r Y ,1: t �� ,�.'. G�((i Lam• L /l_�! �.�'L i - { •e".a ry r# tt+7`y"�s..,, ' ' FLOR>,NCE AGUI, IL ONh � , �"a i CAROL S ,, ti a 9 -I 1 r S L}}��(( f^ 3k Y ! s . '.Y ..i! ti_ ..l t.., c f = n.,;. � ,.-((;<F,rC^-�.cY 4 -i. .(�a Fr, r yq tea? Yry 3 /,:':. :�.f_ //-�-1/' ,< +. . ,§ i�tLt..Y�tyk�✓,s `- LOIS PIERCE k �� ` 4f" " VEY ✓- -d �� r; NETTIE r �� f �,A{{{{� ��� $" ♦ r t i-�s��C� `s �•t�� r RO V' L*`. 'x a x -_: �y,"<� hrhk �,..KrN (rt x Y HARR �. s_,., s y s ,,t r'7 ,nt .Y'`F •z 1 t f N. '�----•s I.. 1 y t .Y Ei t S'�' ,,„h,2 d J x-.. r. ♦ s K,r;^ 'X,hr d Trt +!'R` i .�-.. 4 1 J /� �{ f k , t,, , y j t L t'(� 1 r'1.�: r j ( S s, 5 t k i t '._r i acz. 3+ """ F = NDERSON �a=�f P �' F "�17.u'< ,.,Vf '3, y ; 4 s n a 3 x i - C i ''' '1 K t z. $ '. i.[ 'i �t - t%:` F/ {: .. .r , t' 2 . .�.'w3 t'r': ,t �' r y .i E ms'. >~ a. +4 STATE OF CAI;IFORNIA ) = '�* s '", 3 4z - w ''x 1'v :;a ) t ' " ;COUNTY °OF CONTRA r ;tom, f e� �; COSTA ) ' ' a On th a of `Jul ; 1971, before me, fir t , is Y Y h he •for the State of California,` with principal office in , f y j a,Notary Pub �`���'`i ''? y ersonally appeared SEHURN HILL,` CONSTANCE KAHN• y�; _' A- Contra Costa Count , 'p k���t14,4 z;= `fps, t = , " . ZELi3lA DAMS,._SONIE MITCHELL, FLORENCE AGUILAR, CAYtOLz'-WILSON, NETTIE _1 j ht � a� �, ,, tai �� 9 k ,b £.y�.X r,, -L .. f�3•v 1,,.,.. :. t LOIS PIERCE, MARY <HARRIS, ROBERT GRAY, ` n� „VE r z %�xj �rti �� HkRVEY, a LMA HENDERSON, G r {:. � - hose 'names are subscri _ zi. k trt be o t € ,{ i{ the ersons w ' d t j he A Kr4 a �i !' known` to me to be P h : +E4s� i v = .r$ v s 1s f ?w;thin Articles of Incorporation, and acknowledged fto' me {that. theyi z p `a n � r A .executed the _same.X s w s v+ .t t,,� C"�' �' h{ OF I Have hereunto set,my hand and affixed 'my ,_; w.=; a- };�r i, IN WITNESS'WHERE , y , as , t above written 1 r : _' official°:t seal on the day and year first i1 u E $ `?• 3E'�� �.,V Y v ,� .t i r �i''j/,/.7� .`". _ t ^� (.�PL �- f f'JiY „ .7.�'tik,,. . yar -;<k{ i a r F •ti "(.,(,�'r 4� _. _ af'r tF <t; 'ya . �'',� Np - , �F1t IA S ,yam= `1 EAL '' r VFf (t�A (� I I IVDtRSQN �`'' �, zf ._4 _, `__Kr�� `NUTAAY PUB6_C CALIFORNIA x r�� � -z `' w STh'1'I' U�':,(.AI/1I UIt ) �``M.! Gib31 r r t , ;t.�7SfA GU i sN t { s- '. ,, : ,� y� ,.. ) SS. }�%�_W&i missidTi IresApr 1U i9/3 �, 4x a r ..^ _ _ r� '- wiz 3i >u `Z�St�j.'J I rif t rlf�'I'f�A`(�0:;I'A ) 431 Sixth SC RichmonJ. call. 9a � ,' �� i _. - '� • ��I,fr iir,flersiynrd being first duly sworn, each for: himself, deposes h _ r t, iAt t, k „: . /'s " and says: t - k. t That they are the Board of Directors of the- KAYO VISTA TENANTS K } _ `.rs 1' v `', - � } COUNCIL' CORPQRATION, . '�► �t,". , -_ it -. -----�._......a- a _. --•� , --... _ ' f #, — .' �•=.•mak. r— i 'a.'�-j,. T.ak ^A .r ' ,3� �F r x. a, ^ _--• ._T ..t �""rs Y 1. i sr r 3 r n t x 1 j �� ', , '"" _�=�ss- rY � ,-N't �"`z�,r• �t ' !ms,." S r s~ j�T s c Lr -y r i'� " .. - i. .�y � t'l t-'���'�t�ttT,r _j J a r s �t i n t F t rn ¢ ,y ^ c"�'4c3 x w 3�X2, y c -r r a" �.� s "�i x -r^ ^r- .••- � z" tTu 4.-3 ';"�`s are t =r r s« r . ^""" "` ri"F -�.' �„„'L. i�- y ..._. «•S. ,«.-�wJi":dt •'3�r. Coo n. 7 3 t� C”.r ' , , , =S.t_.. x , r .._� ` ..c'r t rr' r r ,::�"+••--*r.tt„+use*lt..-ns" i -- '' .?.._, _ K r. ;, -. .. ,. .. .. :-.... y�j� '"R c'34 *� fir? s ^ � as a ' f,••p,^^•�':-�g `- y r cry�a�+f'y �k� �`�x�� 4 L r ��� �'at'P++" �`2' �+ a.?r to � 1' 4 F "'+�h tom. + r c '• 1 -y � �r _ h �� said:unincorporated. association .menned in `the foregoing Articles tio E X1 s of, Incorporation, that 'said association has duly authorized zts incor F k potation and,_has authorized thea-undersigned to execute the Articles � f Incorporation. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we the undersigned, ' being'the "personed s namJ above as the first Board of Directors have executed these Articles of s Incorporation this jit? ,day of July 1971..of , .h! f. ��) � iii �� 1� i t,,-. " f l .t ,� � '��• SEH/URN HILL CONSTANCE N :KAH r ZL IS SONIE: MI HELL w �' FLORENCEAGUILA CAROL�WILSON � r .�. • r��� f r ,LOIS s NET Ig HARVEY fi I fr RY S RO ERT GRAY ' IMU�" VELMA HENDERSON t µ iL Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of July, 1971. r.` � u xBAL` a` = OFFICIAL S VFIH HENDC P.SON Y PUBLIC CALIFORNIA NU7AR cou�'•11•y NOT Y PUBLIC s 97 p +i� �.� e� e If► t V t31l:uss.onEx�+resApry2U :c is yyaat i V {_ t -f �i M. •S t F- j s f t• 2 r i r _ r �5. . 3 L:t 4. a7, w:w.�. I5, v"wn i'{ i •2 '� S i R ♦ I I `f F d ` 4 x k ' ..1�,•.'�'',7�r„tY.a �: x,.....::�..r- '.' ,T+.�. � r,•«s"Z'2' ti a.'C ' �Y .:t L 3� � cif '� ' f jt `r -�-3 ���� � '� ����. �"�':-c, r � � "''•z� .ti'>,. A � s� t ' s -: "'�z + 3�i`,�rF• ��w-i a� ,�l�, z r sj''�„xc'�,�c';�����«�'k j'� �� 4 �� � � c;� ��,fy 3✓. i ,.`: , - ._... ;� . +:ass. _._ - T �r �4♦ r`. .^.<.�. .:+,---+ „�.•�„�,75:,x.. ^.�fi.. .a ,a.a+.�o�t,F.,.r...... •t++pR•*p.'•n.+ •.- .,�.-a..w-..%-1.-r.•--..,.. ..,.�.r„ _ i t{ xt ,yM1.�. 11 I— i t {, tr • 1 } t✓ `. .fin r1 E' k �.a r , _ �: i '� •! 11 v !' , ti+ i — 'BY LAWS f . •BAYO VISTA TENANTS COUNCIL �CORPORATION ,, f 4 ' ANon-Profit'"Corporation ; •�. - ,.. 4 t, 7;` r• 7;. ^I O.: , t,'' ,� ARTICLE I. : , a yam{ i �r� =,i# .Offices - The principal office of the corporation inJ the State of ' '� L' r _ I W. �`` i California shall be located in .the Cit of Rodeo Count of Contra Costa. s`- . t ' The cor ration ma . have such other offices er. with or1. wi ut ` 5 �: corpora eith in tho ._: �;' y ," `� ' • the County of-Contra Costa, State of California; as,;the,Hoard of ,: , t .11 ' { . , Directors may' determine- or as *the off airs of the corporation may�require °` '� .: ,...z.t--(i. -:z. 7�I` from,time -W ♦We•y• t• 11 4. s �r h + t'' r ,. '� Ty�••}f� ! Fr ARTICLE IIS ` _� � '. Y t t ;.) ` .. t.r,:� r section ,I - Classes of Members �� f , M� - a Ata 1. t j ,- J I, � t " t • i F4 a. '`•�'�' •The corporation shall have one (1) class,.of members. ,.The de- x LLTf_ ' 2 . ..• L r$ t 1, � signation of'such `class and the qualifications and. rights.°of the members �` 11 - .t I•i: # -1,r of.such -class 1.shall1.be as follows: The memtiesship of the: corporation _. f Jam° ��ehall consist of every Bayo Vista gousing Protect tenant:' ' .> .. - , yI �,M-yy��r 1 4 .- - - •) y _ -, ,.' fi , f 4 ARTICLE III• '� ;• i y ,; i' ' Secti_on 1 .-- Annual Meeting, 3 ' t k-11 . ( An .annual,meeting o� .the members shall be held at" Rodeo, on: they, r,,r , : 4 "' XX } first: day in �the month. of June in each,year,: beginning with the year r,i , • �s :1 ik,4'+ 1. 1971 at the hour, of 7 s30 •o'clock .m-- foie the se of electia • r « P ' directors and for the transaction of such other business as may bo�ae , "; , .i r.x � t •r �r r4 ' `, r -before the meeting. If the day` fixed ,for the annual meeting. shall b'O <, - - -. :, 4,4 f - - U 'a a Jogal,holiday ing. the. State •of California, such `meeting ;'shall be,held 1.t _ { {{} t 1. C ;r} , , ♦ h e Ott - . F IV r_;� `.on. the next succeeding business day. If the; election' of=�dired. shall ° ; not,.be held on the day designated berein for any ;anii :nual .meeting, or a7.t` , ;,,�, } . r any ad journment thereof, the Board of Directors sha­11-1ll• cause. the election `5;` E e z% � to bs held at.'a special meeting.'of the .members as soon thereafter as ' - ,� i 'i s 11 1. f �" conveniently may• be. t :{` z, Section 11 - Special Meetings '` - ' * . - I 1 ,::,� ��� �, , _�.j , i �;. �tr Special Meetings of the members may be called by the president, - art the Board of Directors, or not less. than one-tenth of the. members _having .A. . - . l < jc'�` � ,.' ` - voting rights. All annual and special meetings shall be held at: the A s �,,. -:, - _ _ �� -1• ?1` —i .4 �- i ft.,„,•a t,'7 •�.z'�• rn a'tIlz-_eW -. S+a•t%'a�', •N.- � .--...• ,7 i . ! �, 't 1. -A a z -. t �".{ .." :`3sr�a� a- s ,F.-�^..-Y 7,,x- C ' •�y �'. Z. :a�� F r'_ �•.l •r ... , :` -vt..!"•' ts.—"'.a_,c.,.�,•„ 'a • t t-.s.;�•-,.��a yy .-r stir-t` a.-.,. .r �. 'c .� �'° •tip . t► 4, Vt i�r-ttRc r Y i -� ter • !- 'r.£ »rs, (rx "fit.i to t» ? »� r INN :.. ,��„_ ••.y:^" 's.5' ..Y. •^.-..x.'�'S«.�.,-..Y^'•'. t- ..5C7-"'m •J_ �'r�.y.. '2'-'1"5,... '„� ]" `�".S. Z: ...... +w. ^; v 1. tvr m ';_ .. '^•-. I. Xs. t is_ �, J°'•�••• r� F t 3 {r-r Z j K _ i tt14C' � k•• S>x, rC .. -' 2 t. ° 1„`f"" '� «ey ^`� tY S`� r• �,. '' r �'� .{• i.:t.` i� }rkv t. N -.s.. .. �- .. 4K Si. S ,, 1\ I'� "`li' C S.. { N 1y-Yw r b �y< X'Y L ,ry.. L 1532 li 5-R ~,-0 r, 4 ,r a ,3 Sy N�` Ny'`N yr- 1. {S 1 -c5 y �„ t 11 r .�tj 3 .F�e SG . �� r r -, , ­­­;�J�:�I:". � , �--;­'11� _'.�,-­— t !0 _ t. t-- I - I ��`i r% i f r l'�-T' 5 ~ r i< ..� � R. ,, � - , ,­��zj, p. 1i �'_ -_­1 �, ,,, ,- r . . I . � --_1�- - 11.::�`J'._�Ilr_�,I I ­_�,']­,­'�' ., s .A t i 7 - T ,y, t �iT"y •:r. J r.,1 ='r r t Vii- i �r .`'"�' . auditorium of".the Bayo vista Administration`Buildag 3n Rodeo, :Calaforna. . . : . . ,-;._< . L , Section SII Notice of Meetings _111 .' 1. Written or printed notice stating thd. place, day and hour. "of any meeting of,members shall be,A.olivered either personally or'`by` mail,, , %e d . i !C, L r -.` �. . - , hs :W• ` to each member entitled to vote' at`such;meeting, not less than:'ten or rt" +� more. than fifty days before the' date of such meeting, by or at ;,the ,; � ' . I •I j L .. I ­ 1• , y direction of the president, or the ,secretary, or the officers or persons- 11 �. : '� F... ` N`,+i . 9, calling the meeting. In case of a .special meeting or.',when required`-by �,'.: }, ; statute or by these by-laws`, the purpose or -purposes for, which. the meeting ^4 �� ,' . ,, : ,:. I 11 'L is called, shall_ be stated in' the notice..'i If mailed, -the notice- of ',a r x +, «, ,i •�, t"a�eetinq shall".be deemed .to be delivered When depositik in' the United _, ��, , r, . =r{ t} ,,a y1 = States mail addressed to the mem1 . ber at his- address; as it "appears on the R M If: r j: "�r' ecoids ;of the corporation, 1. Ipostage- thereon re ,aid. . �t A. = poration, with1 . I. prepaid.. - �. Section IV Informal" 'Action by` Members �... . t s -s ; s i .Y s1 i ' t 4 Any -`action required by law to be taken at a meeting-.of the - F h -+ i , - . ..: � i' A *t16� ,�*members, or any actipn which may be taken at a-meeti g of members, may be 5`; 11 L. ,t ��i .,* taken without a'meeting' if a consent in writing;'settinq forth the - i�_ r action`so taken, . shall be signed by all of' the member­ 11s 'entitled , t�=� `may ♦ 5. � k .1 , ct t k L Y;4 i`>'', vote ,with ,respect, to .tbe subject; matter thereof. `, '' }' I. I. `r - r ' •.,f� ti Section V - Quorum ST f ' :j a ' • - a �> 1 In ` The members holding 15 percent of the:votes' which may be c1.ast t ` F 441k "'`�',A=�' at any meeting shall constitute. a quorum at 'su1 . Ich meeting. . ;Ift a quorum is � I I . _ ., not present at any meeting of-members, a majority of the aembers present, VE )� -1-0, Q'1 rt 1 ,i :.. - x t i y t i r; • y r . t may adjourn the meeting from time to time without Tfurther. notice:> ; ,t1. ART ICLE IV . _ �`' '' Board `of Directors — , S 1 �` r . Section 1 - General Powers _ G !� t j( . Y 7 s .. The affairs of the corporation shall be managed by its Board ` � _ - .' of Directors. ' Directors must be residents of the Bayo=,VZsta Housing . } �r t Pro 'ect. The' five (5) directosa' receiving the gseatest number of votes :, w shall hold office until the let day of June, `1973 and until their ' 4.- - f ,. * • , •". ,-.� successors have been elected and qualified. The ot1. her six directors shall t. t' % .. " ;,. rI hold office until the • lst.-day of June, 1972 and._until their successors 3 r t '-' 'k` .> '•� '��� rhall have.yeen elected and qualified. t y -, j -'�} ' t ^ 2 rr 7 Y.0 0. , � Z �• .., .x • '•j-1 *'r .. a ... t:•n !X'.i. y„ t 1. •�,, .... �.. Y.e. 33 Y Y 4 i "7 3 t r �!.] irk'-K'44t iA `�J- ! .} 1I:Jet .{'1• �tv �• Je L 3 y_ ie.Rut" L � + zz L r Lt , K� a t'ilT . i t 5a .., .. f. `+ r Y r fy ,�> A !C " : . . r._ X. ;'.` "�'"''' *�'hc2,t N�,p�"'.:, hum fir. ^.+.,r•4F Fr d ,-�•. .y� +.• •,,,.,F,rtdga-n M y _ 7' ,�..r 1, r .lit " yt ' - r ` 't "•Y s s F l �✓ *_ ,: - -"I 11 I .i i 7 4i 11111 �u.�.�.�iii•aaa F. �5. (. T �yy�.. P- Section 1l Regular "Meetings 4 - �' � ,S- . 01; F M s. ` A` r-egu"iar 'ars , < L' meeting `of- the Board 'of` Dire17.ctors ,"shall be 'held';: i i," without other nU notice ; _„ t� ,Y.. n this by-law, immediately after, and at: the ;- same piac.e as , the annual meeting of members. The Board of Directors - :� maf provide bf resolution the time and place,. either within or without . T._: the State of California, for the holdinq .of additgnal regular meetings - " of tl�e Board without other notice than such resoluti"on + . . . r III 1. r Section iil - Special Meetings — ':,: �. ,: �-. • ` -. k . �. - Special-meetings of the. Board :'oF' Directors .ma . be ,called ;b �; ; Y. y or at:; ,. the request of the president or;'any two directors. The person 'or 1.0 _.;:; +4:; persons authorized to call"special meetings of th`-. . - d m I may f i.x any `". _ � ' ' � a 11 place, either within or without; the "Stat`e, " as the place for`holdin i tom, °� . ;` ..' special meeting of the Board' called by them: :+ " - _.�, i f` ts. E > 4; k >• Section IV - Notice �= �_.. .. ; 1. 'ti i .dr _� s . 117 t:'. Q. Notice of any special meeting of the Board of Directors ehall be , . ,Y - ,t ;,. N ;'L , given at least 5 days previously thereto by written` notice. delivered 11 I '� ,. personally or sent by mail or telegram to each. director' at" his ,address } K; s ' - ,,_ . - "., ��' as shown by the records of the corporation. If mailed,"I.such notice. shall, j � �>rJ � $, i; be deemed to. be delivered when deposited in the: Un�.ted States mail in t` ,: : t'' a sealed envelope so addressed with > , postage thereon prepaid. If notice" , - 1- s.'.. 4 be given .by telegram, such notice shall be `deemed toi. be dI. elivered -when ., the telegram is delivered to the. tele ra h com an 4 .a. p Y An '.dir 0� 9 P " y ector. may' waiy� i notice' of any meeting. The attendance of a' director at an meetin"" - 1. Y g shall . _ - Dt.. 1 '. :'constitute a waiver of notice of such meetin r #� -,,Y ' g, except where a4 director , tTk �, , attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting to tt►e'transaction ' 1.i11 j. 1' ': _11 j' , *� of any business because the meeting is not. lawfully called.,or convened. tt . _': The business to be transacted `at the meeti"I Ln " P { ` • rs. . g need not be- s ecified in. ':1I" the notice or waiver of .notice of such meetin s F ;y ; g, :unless �ecif�Cally ` *, s.YI. F t� requi %I red by law or by these by-laws. �` � � — I - - ,..- II�� I .� ", . ' I i.j� �4i� i.:�, '. rtl`, -. + �;t-�_f . -k}": , mt Y i;%�-,',�'�:.:-',£'h-, e rr�i?l 1:.i f'�•:w . -:� . � I.aodr tit►"��,I,11 } I I. 1. il �L- - ., - I T f I : I I� , - � ..." - . � . ..:!. I i , ��I I . 1. ..I .4,�, :, ,. .. �*, ,- :!�".:,"� ,1.e�, I -I ., � , � : -e, , s'.. `94 ,� "F � , . .� ,� �," � . - ,­. ,-:::::,�� :%��: '�; I- ,, .�� ;.�, .�, .� ,-:- .�7 , . �, -�, 11 .�"I , . IF,, 1 �!, , St _­�:­�,: O +��QUO�LUt� I I. —�. , tz.k . t r�.,, �� , �p '9 I-�­ �'. f,` r t [tet' ( �.t { s ' y��F ' t f r 4C i ;,r :: r t ', ;;5wen;directors. shall 'constitute:�:a quorum for ahs transaction of a s+ v�eft ° t ` -` i i , i i .' �� # � usiness at any meeting of;;the Hoard, bpt if less than a majority .of th11 e xr= x r t ' �;,. Directors are present" at said m_�eting,. a majority of the Directors resent , kA�` ' '`{ may adjourn-the' meeting from time to time without further notice. ' -OL 1. .� r :. i -. i w. `. � R - t i a G , .K•,� H t + r i 1 1 S t t� 7 ! W"•.4 C ,�u: �"Y' 'CL ' 3 {.,. .,z f` r ipt r . fit} 11-1 .�{ i ti .A� 12 rt 1'is i K 1" fi -, :- "S—1.'k`i- of •-, .. = T ' 7 � J�' �, = t yp :r A f ` ,1 j S -, ,<;a.', jr .� s rP :.r,_ ;r i t s :tAA, , •�,4 , .e1"j-, y-6 -v,r `�. 4,z, ,%i l.,'gk I", N.- sF\ 5a, t L t�4 .:Fz,, s YE "L $ _ v y f'u,�, 1' r .a ..._k • 'S x .,+t y 3_�-b'• ..<apA^ �d .-y i""t''s.,.' x. Y 4 ts�3+i y.44 j-_,!_r} -i ?11 t-` r - ~• "w .4 M , j ' ' } r ) ,� t,.,Gt'+ y <t r7 r r I �t . ,? tI. s t e7r,�. , ... . y tib. � x"r * i 1 .t{/.}, „y\,.�'T.`: �F r f'l'f'��. �.�_•Y�, §^.a." y+. -rM y hK �A S j 1 Y f t" r♦ J 4 ffll. x� 11, Section° VI Manner :af Acting y _r � ,� �° ��, til i : x }, ' - - f co- � " i ' y' .' ,�s .. r. an y x•�' a.s„ ,.$ ... + The act of` a'ma�ority of`the Directors present at a meeLirg atwhic ,�_ i ;_ a quorum` is-present shall be the act of the Hoard of� Directors, unless- '' -the act of a rester number is re iced b law• or b ' these b laws. g . 9v Y Y y Section VII - Vacancies � R y :n 1 �' ' 'O : Any vacancy occurring in :the board of. Directors and any director- :F ,, �i� ship to be fined by reason of an increase in the number of Directors, 1 "' , .' i tr :. . :', shall be filled by' the `Board of Directors. A.direetor, elected . to ,fil'l 74r , , ;, ri a vacancy shall be elected for thp•.unexpired term of his`�predecessor in � . \ r 1 �J > office. ,, �: sI �� . t 1. . Nwl 1 ir `, t. �� Section VIII - Removal T. r 14 1 h }. p � ' a is .� •.. *� If a director'is 'absent from three eonsecntive board"meetings, ' + . E 1 t t , ; ', r he%she shall be subject. to immediate removal frog the Board.. ; ]] . % , _ ,: I F' � 1 s �^r .'yt `' - a} i- ARTIC4Z•V r fr r -. • ", : �. '` ,c ,Sactio11 l Of f Kari t S fl?. e'" 6. <�I _s�, ', '' The officers of "the corporation shall be a president,.,one of 3 =- , 11 i- Y more vice-presidents (the number. thereof to, be deter_niine , by 'the' Bogrd. 6 P s, L.;-. :6 ' , of' Directors) a secretary; a treasurer, Rind such other officers as •may } 6 '� `a• be elected fn accordance with the provisions of this article. The r ' f v " , .: f -V ml . 6Board of Directors may elect or, appoint such other officers, including i '^� n t► One Or more assistant secretaries and one or` more apsistant treasurers, as c : • :, },: y U � `it shall deem desirable', arCh -officers- to have the authority" and perform 4- . . . " . - 1 F 6 AL .. . . *;a. _u,, . the duties prescribed, from time to time, by the Board of Directors. .Any E([ •F • 1 �y1�1 ' 'two or :More offices ma be held b the same erson, exce t the offices of i y by -the P ,P : t, s, c., 'i.. ... president and secretary. R ;`, " ' Section 11 Election and term of office . � �. , �s, r t;'11 I - _w11 The officers of _the ,corporation shall be elected annually by the 1 �; board of Directors at the regular annual meeting of the Board ,gf y t� i ' _ ': Directors. If the election of officers shall not be, held' at, suc meeting, ~~. \ such election shall be held as soon thereafter ae conveniently may. e. : £ > `� New offices' may be, created and filled at any meeting of "the Bo ,of �`, i - ,'� Directors. Each officer shall hold office until his successor sh - have " been duly elected and shall have qualified.. : i . _ ' ' _._ r. . r , , ;.. . . �� . 4. r rq t i':I a.+ - sr._ s ,J{ �'xF' .� -'$t"Sl�cx:.� x *p�x - r. *'� Y<+ , i �., ��, i•r _ t 3j 11�'.. r•a i"i�<,». s w -r <r f� g - !' ,- M it 't 41I'r, ', S ­11'Lbs �- N1' i s t , ...1 i }�4+ yAi r� e a#i tF1 st i a , ' .� 'i.• r t j4 r '� i _ '~� .• Y .I + , j �-£f I, t ftEf t(t. i4 1, r > ' 5 ..I + F � t' ..'•' .i. - '+ U ...ti.. ap 4`.t..-' .� t t r 1r t t s : i tij, i Cyt{}*+i +-itl.f'f5r;y id. y:: .d+�''��1.'1..,..� �. .� { 1 ti '1i.n A 4 t 7t>L 4n }T,2 }K M1 `` ti: G sc s�- t s Ei + r i z i� : 1� C " x11, x -sY� T,=r �i= rr, T, ! '�d x� ct th i.,!: 1_ t� s _ t - .. a.... w...l.._..t. .,_ .�r�,��1'.'.'�,.,1'tie.t���'•` iy'.'.a�.i�+t% 'fir' .. 1 k .. t < - s, c4 _ , y T _ k,e'K 3� r' 1", {i+,.�,.' .1� ', ,w}.wA'Tw,."'^r.r..rn++.+s.. A - M t .J # , h L P 1 T ""`�. y �e ' F "".'•-- ._.,t. .may '� `X' f F a ?'. f a. ._-2.r-. v _ x ``r te E ' # ; �� 2 4 - r:. l -' ;;Z if -w.M- f'+.L <. . J4 fi r; 1: : .. - t > dot' �• ,a > t F t; a t = Section 111 = - r.-1 u Retnov 1 a y ` �.. - _ 1 ,• _ . - . . . . .._ _ . AnY officer elected ora & PPointed b ' `� be removed b Y 'fthe Hoard of Directors may Y the Board of D- r� tors whenever in its ua , interests of the c. � j . 9ment the beet },< orporation would be , , shall be without nerved thereby, but such reawval Prejudice to the contract si ' �, E so remo ghts, i f :#A -,` vee. , Y. of t h s he offices '� Section IV ! y ;+ y.. i� - Vacancies , �` 3 r F p S r r k , h , G i s 4 , - [ q" a4K {t 1,. _ - # t,. ;•d r i ;� hl r I i�.r u s„a � 1•`y w mss'' a. A. vacan ,. s; >� s� �, . '�` `�' �Y ice• ~{ €#w!i t in off z : s _ becau _r. .L ,_ : e edea J•' V s die � ° •4 reel net N w re qualification, or otherwise ° . # , ! � � g fine, -r�o�ral,�_ .1 �� _: �„ t - 4r Boa Tilled �y' .J for the unexp � by the Board of � � - •..�. fired portion s�. ,7; `'ectors ,.. ' f , of the �r�• ' `. { N . '. '.1, faX t}'� 1 T'?'F i•,f, �^i r. •- S { s:v a ,,t - 'f t l 1 Y s. 4, "� iSRr.^{ ' i e. , .r fv l:. .'A - : ?r ;1 c ,A. ! !4� t 1 f L7 f} S ., r}N . w.1 ,bt,G" ,TZ,J 4�`Z, '.. ,r,�ar� {,K x5 veYt� ^.v .— n �'n ♦ Y.- ! ` ..a�t , i'1' �s 4{ . t q` !{# +.�t 3 t2 iF J �ri 1 � ? ! Pre. deAt. S o t r ks} k s � , t'.„3 fit4�r J�7t �`f{c_r 71 � „� � . .. r , p ti , 'r .�z r*y ^Y �; _ t: t7. i r ,:f�[ �f, -t 2 i.r,,f ,t e president shall ,. �, i , . #rai tho pal executive ,�,, � � _r �•� s `corporation and s = ot�ficer o t?u - +a4�, r , ,,. � � hr}ll in general::sups i ' 3 r st ,�. business and affair$ r and ooAtrol all:,of the r `a` �w 1 f of-M•e `Cor r t ;_ •- i r. ,�► po .tion. Ne/ehe'�rh F z, r �? � i , Fr �''4£ seat qs of the : err all preside at ail ` .' `; -�3" ,n memo and of the. Hoard . 't '' ,, _ . I with o Dir tors. He �, _ , . _ the secretary or ` ec iaay oign," ; t n , _ `r y other >: t, r . proper officer of the cor t " •'"" i14 - sed byythe Board of Directors. an r p9ratio', a�ihos�=i� � K �,a, other instr - a rx rK Y eels, awrtgagee,r'bonds, _.Ants �. �;, r wnents which .the Hoard ° ; f }- Hct . or.. � ; i.,3 a - ' : , o! rectors e o � _� Di uthoriz .f executed exc t : s bav ed tofbe 1 �' ` , . eP in case where the si =� '�` ah s •� .�,� y fining aqd; ° ucecution thereof • be expreB a l d hall t*F k;, x� ,> Y_ elcgated by, the Board : .�:°3 ; a of}.Directors orb �� , � statute to some othert;officer or a`eAt` •� r Y these by-laws orb " x-' = ' g of the cor 'x� � poration '=c ys, he shall perform al and in general �x .., r 1 duties incident ,r l i,= to the office ott ,4 }r .� such other president and F& ,,'.t, �- °� - duties, as ma a' �� Y be prescrfbea by ` r .� � to time. • - the Board of Directors t f _ f Y� ar .* r`"r'F asW y r ra -. Section Vl -'ViC t � s "- _.. e. Pre.iden z jf •` t ID .'the ,� ,} ��._ sence �-. of the, president or in'-event of his instil `:` refusal to act'' lity or � _• � h the vice-p hall �.TA fi� a residents r. perform the duties of;the _ T ,f ,t *fi president,` and :when .-- actin - , J. shall have all: th G L i` 4fi`R a posers of and be M subject to all the restrictiu�s`a �� Pon the `president. . 1 .,., Any vice-president : Y �, shalt perform such other duties as from t ime tot I hi�a by: the :preoident orb isle shay bo ..signed to � . i -- k+ i , y the Hoard of Directors. E R-t �s r �.,� ' :t t ... ' , , _ - . :. r .;rz r.r 1 t c i -. .r r-r ; _ f r � _.{. E '� +'..r'Y }.... r"�- ,ri's'rv.,c� tr...f r 4 �` Y t� 4 ....��i.. .R yM..—.; �", i '.� ~ ..�w..,s,. �.5 4iM$ ��.. .i f�. a .i5 t l.d'i .. -if....'S'• -• •.� '.:L.. k w�� � `' "C.'?. w-...•Pf t . �k`1'• is C , £ -+.r 7 r i .� :u y r r L�ori ?;. ! s. 7 ,�;.. Swtli'}� 'T�:,,C 'f 1 �r t -�S' } i',••kt , a , ..r„�..,}"�,�` .,, z �e?'C„,�.r�q,^•.,FCy r�,K'C gar.a,.-w.�..�x•w t al.,n-at�A �;�e.��+`�+:?'Y'i.Y�rr,:s��'�F"�'"�„ `±i'�",�.�i� ��K �- � - r 5 = f aY.� ��_?"y{'p ° _,.t ?x.,�,s§ �t ,y,•Lt'�yr;�frsf�..S I��Yy^y � .S �,+ r,�r > � � -e 1 r s� r•Y`� s? t � i ,# z�.�L, .a ��M•Cy tr , t .,. :; �: - _ ^t z:� ,.,t ¢... � ; t ar t r `'� .1K.+ {.0`'f1�,`may... i - _ L,. %c �.h.+.. fi.r 5 }l, �^ $�'� rug-`�. •X' r '�� t � 1 ;; The: treasurer shall-have charge and custody rA'ot nd�be `�responsible`��� •� 1 - -E �,�,p.-•.�_, r; for all funds ,and securities of,the corporation, receipts for moneys: due 'arid `payable 'to the cosposation' from any source '_ - j • � Whatsoever, and deposit all such..•moneys.. in the name of� the.`corporation 1� 'in such banks, trust-companies, or other depositaries :as shall 'be 4•'' t f -;,.,.,selected in;accordance with the :provisions of`�Artscle .YII u lawss. ;and in general.perform all ,the 'duties incident tothe offsite_ of •' � � .r S. L.tseasurer and such;other ,dutioe incident to the office; of -Tre,aurer-_and._ " I� Y be ch other duties as from time to time ma -Asn i`gnid .president or by the Board of Direct ors. a � � +�i� .t '� Seetiori VISI Secreta The secretary shall koep the „minute• of !h� naetingd o! .the t'' `} " �, �'e sf;•+ members and of; the Board of Directors: 1n one or mole book• provided for .that purpose j see that all not ice• aro duly= given in accosdance,-with tho provisions ,of these; by-laws or ai required by`laws Xbe custodian of thi �� } Z a. �reOr corda F and of: the coal of the corporation and sae, that ?S Y w.�a t.::: _ � •. .. . :: ' ,;; - .. � s `” � alp": corporation'.is affixed .to all•:documente, tt%e execution o! on';behalf of the cor pration under it• Beal is dui authorised in � frf�,�' - r ��•..,u P Y �.� accordance ,with"the �provisions of the8e , poet office address ,of each membes which shall be furnished- to the r tFx�r by such member t and in general 'perforce l-1, duties incident to t ` �'' � 1-' s office :of secretary and spch other duties as froaq P � may be as' 'may _to him by the president or, by the .Board o!1:Directoro "' ,T' _ _ ,'• aka 'Section IX •- Assistant Treasurer8 and' Assistant Secretaries' , ' ' ,a��', +' ��I. t '•�` Ifrequired by the Board .of Directors, the ssei'atant- treaousete ehal t� �i � e bonds -for the faithful ,discharge givof ,their= duties in ....... y=f � and_ ;with :such sureties as the Hoard o! Directors shall 'deteru►ine assistant ;treaauraro and' assistant secretasies:', in :goneral,; shall •mss;( � ';"; ,• .: :;: ,'; � � �� ,�� .fo�caa such duties as shall'-be :assigned .to him by the treaaurez or at� secretary or by the president or _the Hoard o! Disecloss. R} ; 4 f i' Y � Tt • r'•z M'�r'M. 3'� • ...... .^4-r t' v � � Y t ;: 'a .+ K N ' � t „mow ��d y'^^.'i J=INA 1, � 1��' .,i }/"L !d C� t K.:��� �"6•'•� � � t v µ 'M ... � �� .r ha;' 3.. tx .ti* � :�f� �;.;. }}t +;� TF . ,j � t.� hr f`��LT� �slh}'tS � '��i'} t � ..tJt t '" f`t �•� -5�3�� e u .r��+ � k-x z.,- � t �'�' '�� a�"� i 7����w s w(,�-�'i�` '"v``�}.•"�--e°'i ;�;�+ +� 'i''1t ,. � S � �',�`�a, � gr r .,:-r. ..��rE�' • n �: ,x,p „ „...! ���t�r_."}{':y,'�w�,.,,��.: w € �' ^'^•,,�t..w» i'' ." ' .._ -•R:.;..:cx � �..y_, � ..s. � x 'c j ""'���. �t r i^-.-t:.�«.•..r' k,�'�.G..G+.-q xr;Sy rj � , t Z a` ��h �... . St'. Y.. '� e•^''t,,,, tF �.4. a. � gN.ft�."...'t7'A•.7.. _,.e e« r"'?d�R'w�.r'el. G` � � 'L'�"J-.r-� �:i '�~»=n:��" Fy mY'.,�" � "'LSC t^ti _ '� w?iEyC��'�� +. r"1F.. °s.•e«.y A Y",t� _, ...."�'�,7Nu C�.�,. " �r"'F�""t t-tra•U• ,�' "Lk�F �,C Z���w..'CJ�I Y' r _ , r� ��' �; •x.. a. t.. "�'�' tr �..m x `�:^�'.,.�.,..y-._•r,�`,s`-� _ .�,��.'.7t;i,- ��-•c3Hz" .e..w... «z;ra:; ,,,.-+r.��r�•� "..�`,.a:.�, t�-.e..�, y, •�, ~���� "�'�'t�„L�����--r < �:_�.-.:.e.,�F. �.:....m�Yi t � '�. :,F x�� -�`tz �.������� �.��",.,,;�sa,�z��,�::'_ tT lr ° t �.. t r k �r S� r-,.:ry �v2ti",�y, .r.n t,, A t ar a c 94 , h - tr , R _4 r r �,.�nt i i is t ? v f[ �-,t y S Y t` r t, �..r� ~ s ' rr i 2 .sl_•, ?n+ Y t r ,4,. .YY .y, f ¢r r , 7J 'It y h 'f } 1 t '',,.� t i I- !f � - t _ i l .. i-t' R" X sx.... ' i ,.a? ARTICLE VI ,< � , F,. r ; Committees y i t Section 1 r ,1 �- r Committees of Di rectors �' I �$` a _ The Board of Directors,. by a majority of. he }Drectors:' in office t may designate one or more committees, each of� wh Y ' ., ich shall consist...o > �< ' f t m - X, two or more directors, which committees, to : he extent provided in. said f4'� ` + �� ; resolution, shall have and exercise the authorit of't =oma i ¢ t, � in the iaanagement of the corporation- Y he Board of Director: . T , but the designatiory such .' = f , r�»e= - S r �� s committees and the delegation thereto of� auth-"' — shall not �� ,,, a operate , r °-� rM to relieve the Board .of Directors f t T r �... . or any irdividu ti .-�, al director,. fan �, k },,_ reapo o Y k r � " fix' nelb lity: d uP or .h ti r impose on` it im f I .� �`t r by' law. Y }k , , �, �,. � � . 4 x �s.- - A ��''� ` Section I1'= Ot _i A t,. k yV= , her-C tees �+{ + ,F"r .� r , r _ , ommi t s� !+ �; + o- r S Other. comm. ,. I not:,having and exerci8inq;the authority o- the . :; Er > � , Hoard of Directors. in the management of the corporation may be 'de Y= f " aF aignated by a resolution adopted. by a majority of he uire-ctors: resen #� G J ;� t at a meeting at which .a:quorum is resent, P t . .qtr ; P Except,as otherwise provided 'lt [ f ;f = _ , : f Jp r + in such resolution,- members of each 'such cava 'ttee.shall b, members `pf = •; , t . . ,_ _; �w .: ; a �,� �t i � '� .t '� the corporation, and the president. of the;corporation ahalh a o _ , } asp � � � f t a - - - _ x� ti, pint rthe i s members whenever in their ud i- fl,+` ] gment the bent intere�ta of the corporation & df, 1 3.r{ , : T ;, r shall be served by such ,removal.` . r_ a :. , ` a L ` h . • \, r r �.. , t I i= k �tt yi::. �` , . Section 111 f'4., Term of Office r ' _''~► fab:: t, }� �; } Each ;member of a' committee :shall continue as such until the K ifs.. / ♦ J l }I t 'r + {� =next 'annual .meeting of the members ,of the ,cor orat L �? p , ion and until his :. ��- successor is a. ` .; ,. ,� p_%. I d unless the committee shall be sooner terminated `3; w , >1 , ' r �: or unless such member be removed from:ouch'comm ttee, orV unless s .-_t�} � - } -. , . - member shall cease to ualif r� .� . , q as. .� Y a member thereof. c ti �, ,_ r a 2T., Sect"20 . �`,,. t rz� n iV ''Chairman- i. f ty� �_ One member of each comtaittee ahall be a " : " �f ' �' ppointed chairman. by the ` � 1t person or persons authorized to appoint the.^members ' ; hereof. , IA .• y j , ti Section V _:,P - Vacancies `, s: r ,- p Y y . ; K+ z] Vacancies 1n the memberahi of an committee ma be filled :b . 7` f - Fr s Y r- appointments made' in the same manner as provided in 'the 'case of the 1.3µ�. .�: original appointments. t= tF a '..' - Si _^ .. ... .IA; : » 3��+v»:. f L �'-. Y z s` ty .� a{ r �tx i-tf,x ' �.kk, rt t i 1"Nf a v z t'kt a ,. , !e r r,4 t rs„c.�''7..*r" ,ti.>� ?+ r r i-�s 3 t a :s s` + �.''� t x t 4 i j Jif t j [ 1 i 'trl;.,�.*, ^s ••-.Y.'.•rr ..,sem .t z r 't t F 7 Ir c t - ��. t '7c r r i 1 c ai tAj i Y's 'K 's'k"y'�.r w ?.7' •' '3^r"k �...L y+�, "+ -y ^,,,, ,v I^+�t;u+ �� k•-., 7^. •r�X'1C -f J e� .+3 i� S%l'.is,-.�+fi# n t;� ..- ,_' 'T"'+" ""' t. t «";i.:t* ,.1 i r K-j. ,,, J. ,Li"�•3 ,»w„•y ,s-I :: t•' afs r J' �'ty ��S'•k i y� >,ri f _., «- i rid �a,�s ti r S x i t -fr ,;I? ., ., ,­.-" � _ , . � I ; * 1� 1/ i "s3. ' ,�� - . � . .� � - , -, , lr�`, - -I . i �, ,, $ - #� � -.� t, i . F Irk r C Section VI Qi:orum tiF i 45 Unless otherwise pro•. ",dad :in the. resolution of the -Board of:' `. 1 1. _ { ice Directors deli natio a1. co�r�aittee a' ma grit of .the whole committee ; 1� 114 g i 7 Y , < shall constitute 'a uorum and the act of a majority of the members' ; q .,;, �• . t,' present at a meeting at which a quorum is present' shall be the..act of the � ]_ ; • t :` committee. � - # 1. :} t. : _ Section VII - Rules1. � - • r• ` - + , Each committee may adopt rules for its own government not r' .1 inconsistent with these by-laws or with ru1ee°Caidopted,-by she Board. of - 'r, 11 j • I:�r Y Vii' S ,f1• 5 x �.-.,.: t Directors.' ` Le 11: �t fix° } Itis ti .�jjam rC �_ : , i x s k r t ARTICLE VII. r +,"`_ ,. x y'• d t ' 1. 1 . 11 , 3ecticn 1 Contracts ��r , ,!, I.i -f''_� `r 11 .�; .,' ,i i fir: y;,,,, f , The Board of Directors may authorize' any' officer or- officers, ]r - : 2. A. ``'i4 s. l a a1. nt ora ants of the corporation,' in`addition to the officers so ` y. r S 4 P .; :, :�°'��, `authorized b these by-laws, to enter into any contract or execute and � I 1_1 . .. - ; �j ;,' , A� deliver any instrument in the name of and on behalf of the corporation, � .16-11.lf ' ,` 3�,,;' 11 : �; and sLcY► authority may be,,general or confined to `specific instances. �d r r .f " 11 4'.,�10,�, ,, i 1 ' '' � ' , Section 11 - `Checks Drafts etc _11 it 1. S 2Y iw' ;....�—�— t i ,; 11- W. ", a ' i All checks, 'drafts, or orders .for the payment of money,, notes, I. � �` Asn �a:•. or other evidences_ of indebtedness issued in .:the' name of ,the corporat$on, t�� '� ? . shall be signed by such :officer or officers, ,agent or agents of the 'n' a x # - 1� cor oration and in such manner as shall from time_ to tame 'be determined by P1. 11 � . ',,. �'Ir 11- - resolution of the Board of Directors. In the absence `of such, deter 1 . �`1 . �. ,r _ [ f - 3 _'1 J if � 11 °' .urination by the Board of Directors, :such instruments shallI I be signed by k"�, - ,,{ 'I - the treasurer. or an ,assistant treasurer and countersigned. by the president t �,, r. ,. r .�R,_ �`f or a vice-president of the corporation. c7 �y' a ► 3 s =R tq`+ ] t.; Section 111 - Deposits ' _ r� 8 ' I. 1. s • All funds of the corpor tion shall be deposited from . ,, a tT .1o the credit of the corporation in such banks, ."trust companies, 1or r tr ,� tim $ . �} 1. other aepositaries as the Board of Directors may select. T�', t. I 1-11 f. -Section IV - Gifts K , 4 The Board of Directors may accept on behalf of the corporation , ,�­ 1 I a I -0 D —- i i � > ♦ 1. 1. 1 � � % ..='�-���,-=�::':,"'���t�-�",-"-,�'-""-�',';2�-:' - — -�� ,q,_.: , ­ ­ , -:-.�,:�'-[."-;:,-,�,,,� .��. G-. s .:, .'Yat x.4 r r•... 7q �, t . rye,,. �. f} a , Sit „ a... . ,' xr Y `x^s ..x'- " v - r rte^ .z„•. 3 a,{ '.e�,' u ryk. ° , t m itt k j s.. $ 11 $ - •t S 4 3 1'` J •+.... 4 .b...d . (. r1 ', Y.j.. ti f r "i.al.FY�i ^] ,.SS .. ,3tSttMt�*4°.sus; l `fY eY, �1Xu r ...+ '- . :'n. art a #Lr ''' F • } r .••.,._. """:"I e ...•.i A ids.],r* _�: 1 j t+, a'w•7�1•'. N t x i1 r i- V " _ •. Y f f I r t.{g 7 Y I.f-^ .. - " J - 4 ri any contribut` - « t i ion, gift, bequest; or devise; for:the � t,_. for anY special general purpoaos. or _ x Purpose of the corporation. .,� .r� 1-,Et ARTICLE VIII. € j •_, . : ,, I; BOOKS a21C R@CQras . - . f o;r '' the corporation shall kee � �' a p correct and complete books and ': records of account and shall al : d` so kee . P minutes of the proceedings of its members j � Board of Directors - ,, and committees `havir, an :� ,n authority` of the Board of Directors a 9 Y of the +(� ''� .�` .. �� :. ;� , nd shall keep at the registered or : principal office, ':a .record giviri t f, �.� - g . he name$ and L addresses of the members $ 1 ,t # W entitled to - vote. AlI books and records of the cor or ` r s� -- inspected b P ation may be � , Y any memo 4 er, or his a ent I r j �, �¢c '• g attorney: for~an ,t R., at any reasonable ti k, �,�,�j 5 Y proper purpose �, # me.: i �s , � . s, :�� 4k y �'S �� 7r 1 6 - ..�+ f 4 4. : ' ARTICLE I7C j`ra r ', r z� �} '.r ' +�. t r �= Fiscal .Year . 4 ,�., c_ n The fiscal " 4 �r 'q year of the corporation shall begin ;on. the .f 1` ;� _ R. ;� Y;*' ''' of Januar first day F . j, �, F y and. end on the last day of'. December in ,each`- j� rs year ,t,►F: }'rte z � , .V ARTICLE X. Atnendrtents -to B -laws , :; { I +t K --. These :hy la ,' ' -_. t ws .I be altered. .amended or. ,� ' i -_ laws ma be _ repealed and new; b P F r4' Y adopted by a ma orit f �� Y J y of the directors rte ;, ��• t�� ��C _T ` meeting :or at an s P --►ent at any regulars l ;.,. Y pecial meetin a - - �� _ ..n g. if at le set 30 days' xrYtten notice: iso Y given of: intention' to alter, amend, or repeal ortr `' r _, o adopt new b' 'laws t,' at such meetin g This. provision is subject: to the w ;�- - -_ -' . power of a majority � _ of the members to change or repeal ,the `b a y - Y laws. ' ` �: � .` > �i t" F f 1 i 1? Vis _.... .. - -a - 1 ` r.� C f _ �r j1 r t c• - e a _ ! - S F1 ,4� r - - - r - r'� si. , - t , s' '* . i ' "` ;, rr _k x_ , , - . - 2; - - di r 9 X KT .. • - ;� _'� , : ; x ....' `*'' t^1.1 ^; 1. t 4.r A,.if:: d! {'�j s d s i '' ' f •}" r n ` "jai+} 't' ay i ..., '.C` „7 + F T 1 -: _ .2 r Xt ....s '� 1( I- L 'f ,e 1 �!,•.I '�i' „ r"'tP r. d i, y '�.' n w`i 4 c.,'zti c r. t t t r P St.. :x•iw r h 4� } i .z.' s. .E c rx S z f { I i 3'" .. '� r ,T r z 3.t I -:a .�rry'�:.9:,i r �i� r t -r it + +4 7 a r : y.'' q.. ,,y� 9 i i+ +, tiw� fi ," [ .—.!Y iZ:-a..,».' �s3a i i '� a`1 cr 1^i w t t #r - #'-"' ,,f. � '+'. .an, 7R .' L"' + Y �r� x "" +' .+; r"d t f s q�` C'a�'�,^ r."" in syr, 'c ^7" "-�G. "G.�e �'"'.."Ls,• _ i 'T rt' .w - t. ? a" tc x. ....,fir,-'.� .,.'O'F: .?�`- k �'' *'°' A 3��'•2,� ,'' ! �,.. s � '...P „S } v ; � .y .s.r ,tom � . �r _. { . . .KwMm•=K �t, � '"� ' �� fU ''''fiF"i�.G9 fl.,r'r ,�,-.-�'�'.'i""��,',,'�t1 I e;js IN T3E BOARD 0-' SUPERVISORS 0, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFO.TLTIA In the Matter of } Complimenting the Office of ) County Administrator on ) RESOLUTION N0. 73/593 1973-1974 Budget Preparation. ) } ITEEREAS this Board of Supe-1-visors has concluded its budget deliberations and approved the 1973-1974 County Final Budget; and WHEREAS Supervisor E. A. linscheid noted for the attention of this Board that the Office of County Administrator had spent many weeks and many hours of uncompensated overtime in reviewing department budget requests, in consulting with. department represen- tatives on such requests, in checking on thousands of budget items, in preparing its Budget Message which was adopted by the Board as its 1973-1974 County Proposed Budget, and in conferences with the Board Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) and department heads for the purpose of developing recommendations on changes in the approved 1973-1974 County Proposed Budget for detailed review by this Board prior to approving the 1973-1974 County Final Budget; and WHEREAS Supervisor Linscheid also noted for the attention of the Board that the Office of the County Administrator had reduced the budget total as originally requested by $32,500,000 and dimin- ished the number of requested positions by more than 500 before presenting its Budget Message to the Board; and Iff1EREAS Supervisor Linscheid further noted for the attention of the Board that Mr. Fri Fernandez, . Assistant to the County Administrator, was a key employee in budget preparation and had performed very meritoriously under time schedule pressures; I OW Y THEREFORE, BE IT BY T=E BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA. COSTA, CALIFOR�;IA RESOLfi'D that it expresses sincere appreciation to the Office of the County Administrator for fine 1973-1974 budget work and extends particular thanks to 11r. Frank Fernandez, Assistant to the County Administrator, for his budget efforts and accomplishments. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 1973 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. ?. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor J. 2,1oriarpy. cc: County Administrator CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of the original document which is on file in my office, and that It was passed & adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County. California. on the date shown. ATTEST: T Pj' N. County Clerk&ex-officio Clerk of said Boar upervisors. by Deputy Clerk. / .�: on SYS3 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Thursday , August 'g0 19 In the Matter of Retention of Certain Matters in the Administration and Finance Committee. This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974, the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) having submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday , August 28, 1973; and Mr. Sebe Hill, President, Carquinez Coalition, having appeared and urged that federal revenue sharing funds be allocated to implement a low cost public transportation system for the communities of Crockett , Rodeo and Port Costa; and Mrs . Mattie Harrison and Mrs . Evelyn Paoli having also appeared in support thereof; and Sunervisor A. M. Dias having recommended that aforesaid matter be retained in the Administration and Finance Committee for further consideration; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the matter of establishment of a central laboratory for sobriety testing services (discussed by the Board on Tuesday, August 28, 1973) also be retained in said committee for further review; and On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor Boggess , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J . P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None, ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc • Congressman Jerome t-laldie Witness my hand and the Seol of the Board of . Mr. Hill Supervisors Sheriff-Cor -er affixed this 03 th day of August , 1973_ Auditor-Controller � W, T. PAASCH, Clerk Board Committee 1P Is Administrator By u.L Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 5/73-15M ` •V ••! • L IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS op SCONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of ) Administration and Finance Committee ) September 4 , 1973 on Referrals Dealt with by Final ) Budget Recommendations . ) This Board on August 30, 1973 having; adopted the Final Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 , as recommended by its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) ; and The Administration and Finance Committee having submitted a report this day with respect to a considerable number of items which were referred to it for review in connection with the proposed budget deliberations , and which were dealt with by Final Budget recommendations, to wit : REFERRAL DATEITEM r2-13-73 Continuation of the Concentrated Burglary Suppression Program by Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner including the staffing required to conduct same; 3-13-73 Report of County Administrator entitled "Impact of Reagan-Moretti Tax Shift Bill (SB 90) " ; 4-30-73 Request of Joseph L. Hirsch, O.D. , urging that priority be given in the budget for the 1973-1974 fiscal year to permit a reoranization of the Human Relations Commission and funding for a full time Director and Secretary; 15-22-73 Proposed amendment to policy regarding placement of children under three years in temporary foster homes , as requested by the Human Resources Director; 5-22-73 Request of Human Resources Director to authorize payment of Group I ATD rate for board and care of certain General Assistance recipients who require supervised care; 5-22-73 Request of Mr. Martin R. Loey that position of Ombudsman be added to county staff; 5-15-73 Allocation of revenue sharing funds for consideration in conjunction pith the coul.ty budget for fiscal year 1973- 1974 ; 5-22-73 Continued review of Work Furlo..,gh Project in terms of type of facilities , program, and cost of facilities ; 5-29-73 Communication. from G. W. Watt, Office of the Secretary of the Treasury , on procedures regarding general revenue sharing funds ; 5-29-73 Reauest of San Francisco Bay Area Council for allocation of $1,000; 5-5-73 Letter fro? !'.arti nez Human ?esou"'ces Ccmnmisslon endorsing the proposed 1973-10,74 work nro -^ar and budr-et of the County -H-uman Relations Co-mission; 0 f REFERRAL DATE ITEM 6-19-73 Matter of Budget 1-7essage of the County Administrator for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; ' 6-19-73 Report of Board Hunan Resources Committee on restricted social service programs , for follow-up action; If 6-19-73 County Community Action PrograM and EOC proposal- for a County Department of Community Development, for con- sideration in conjunction with determinations on use o_`' revenue sharing funds and the final budget ; re- referred from Human Resources Committee to this committee;. 6-25-73 Disposition of the 14 diminished Social Work Supervisor I positions , for review in conjunction with the final budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; 7-3-73 Letter from Mr. Audrey 0. Bustanoby, Walnut Creek, requesting that applications for revenue sharing funds be carefully examined for excessive administrative costs; 7-3-73 Communication from Contra Costa Council on Aging requesting financial support from Board to continue the countywide Friendly Visitors Program; -7-3-73 Letter from Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pertaining to SB 400 regarding the euthanasia of animals ; 7-24-73 Communication advising that the Superior Court Judges have voted in favor of permanent appointment of Mark Thomas as Juvenile Referee; *7-24-73 Reauest of Superintendent of Schools for levy of taxes for the maintenance of regional occupational programs ; 7-30-73 Suggestion of ?r. Anthony G. Lagiss, Lafayette, that federal revenue sharing funds be used to establish a county museum; 8-7-73 Inquiry of Congressman Jerome R. Waldie as to feasibility of Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee obtaining revenue sharing funds; 7-30-73 Request of Concord Child Care Center for funding day care services for preschool children; 8-14-73 Request for county sponsorship of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program; ('Funds included in Final Budget) On the recomme_,dat ion of the Administration and Finance Corrmzittee, and on motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that each of the above-stated items is . L:E TOVED as a committee referral. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors T. P. Kenny, 1.4. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None. ABSENT : Svoervisor J. E. " oriarty. e - I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of September, 1973. W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Lourette Kincaid Deputy Clerk cc : Board Members Administrator Auditor-Controller Sheriff-Coroner T11r. Hirsch Human Resources Director Mr. Loey County Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Council Economic Opportunity Personnel Director Martinez Human Resources Commission County Human Relations Commission Social Services Unon, Local 535 Mrs . Bustanoby Conra Costa Council on Aging Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Agricultural Commissioner Honorable Jackson. Davis , Superior Court Judge, Department 6 Probation Officer Superintendent of Schools Mr. Lagiss Mr. Cub icciotti, Chairman, Advisory Committee, Retired Senior Volunteer Program 1.V V June 19, 1973 Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) Clerk of the Board (by Sandra 'Stimler, Deputy Clerk) 1973-1971.E BUDGET MESSAGE of the County Administrator The Board today referred to you the BUDGET MESSAGE of the County Administrator for fiscal year 1973-1974. ss Attachment cc: County Administrator ! In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 19 , 19 Z3. In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of 1973-197 . Budget Message of the Count; Administrator. The County Administrator having submitted his BUDGET MESSAGE for the fiscal year 1973-1974; NOW, TBEREF'ORE, on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded b9 Supervisor J. P . Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said BUDGET MESSAGE is ACKNOWLEDGED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said BUDGET MESSAGE Is APPROVED as the basis for the preparation and issuance by the County Auditor-Controller of the 1913-1971 Proposed County Budget; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the BUDGET MESSAGE is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) • The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AXES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT.: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrator Supervisors Board Committee affixed this 19th day of June , 19 73- W. T. pA ASCH, Clerk gy Deputy Clerk Sandra Atimler H 24 7/72-15M k _ IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Platter of Report of ) Administration and Finance Committee ) September 4, 1973 on Referrals Dealt with by Final ) Budget Recommendations . ) This Board on August 30, 1973 having adopted the Final Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974, as recommended by its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) ; and The Administration and Finance Committee having submitted a report this day with respect to a considerable number of items which were referred to it for review in connection with the proposed budget deliberations, and which were dealt with by Final Budget recommendations , to wit : REFERRAL DATE ITEM *2-13-73 Continuation of the Concentrated Burglary Suppression Program by Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner including the staffing required to conduct same; 3-13-73 Report of County Administrator entitled "Impact of Reagan-Moretti Tax Shift Bill (SB 90) 11 ; 4-30-73 Request of Joseph L. Hirsch, O.D. , urging that priority be given in the budget for the 1973-1974 fiscal year to permit a reorganization of the Human Relations Commission and funding for a full time Director and Secretary; "5-22-73 Proposed amendment to policy regarding placement of children under three .years in temporary foster homes , as requested by the Human Resources Director; 5-22-73 Request of Human Resources Director to authorize payment of Grouo I ATD rate for board and care of certain General Assistance recipients who require supervised care; 5-22-73 Request of Mr. Martin R. Loey that position of Ombudsman be added to county staff; -15-73 Allocation of revenue sharing funds for consideration in conjunction with the county budget for fiscal yeac 1973- 1974 ; *5-22-73 Continued review of 1111ork Furlough Project in terms of type of facilities , program, and cost of facilities ; 5-29-73 Cormunication from G. W. Watt , Office of the Secretary of the Treasurer, on procedures regarding general revenue sharing funds; 5-29-73 Request of Sar. Francisco Bay Area Council for allocation of tl, 000; 6-5-73 Letter from ?artinez Human Resources Cor_mission endorsing the Proposed 1973-1974 work ororran and budget of the County iuman Relations Connission; r 0 REFERRAL DATE ITEM 6-19-73 Matter of Budget !Message of the County Administrator for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; 6-19-73 Report of Board human Resources Committee on restricted social service programs , for follow-up action; 6-19-73 County Community Action Program and EOC proposal for a County Department of Community Development, for con- sideration in conjunction with determinations on use of revenue sharing funds and the final budget; re- referred from Human Resources Committee to this committee; 6-25-73 Disposition of the 14 diminished Social Work Supervisor I positions , for review in conjunction with the final budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; 7-3-73 Letter from Mr. Audrey 0. Bustanoby, Walnut Creek, requesting that applications for revenue sharing funds be carefully examined for excessive administrative costs; 7-3-73 Communication from Contra Costa Council on Aging requesting financial support from Board to continue the countywide Friendly Visitors Program; x7-3-73 Letter from Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pertaining to SB 400 regarding the euthanasia of animals ; 7-24-73 Communication advising that the Superior Court Judges have voted in favor of permanent appointment of Mark Thomas as Juvenile Referee; *7-24-73 Request of Superintendent of Schools for levy of taxes for the maintenance of regional occupational programs ; 7-30-73 Suggestion of Mr. Anthony G. Lagiss, Lafayette, that federal revenue sharing funds be used to establish a county museum; 8-7-73 Inquiry of Congressman Jerome R. Waldie as to feasibility . of Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee obtaining revenue sharing funds ; 7-30-73 Request of Concord Child Care Center for funding day care services for preschool children; 8-14-73 Request for county sponsorship of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program; ('Funds included in Final Budget) On the recommendation of the Administralion and Finance Committee, and on motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that each of the above-stated items is RE1�?011-ED as a committee referral. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. L?nscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None. ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Mori-arty. w I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true 'and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of_ September, 1973• W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Lourette Kincaid Deputy Clerk cc : Board Members Administrator Auditor-Controller Sheriff-Coroner ,..r. nlrsch Human Resources Director Mr. Loey County Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Council Economic Opportunity Personnel Director - -v Martinez human Resn=­-_7 vountJ ='iun!an Relations Commission Social Services union, Local 535 �tr,s . Bustanoby Conra Costa Council on Agj gig Contra Costa 3ocietJ for the Prevention of Cruelty to Ani^-als Agricultural Commissioner 11 1 -orable Jac'- Davis, Superior Court Judge, Department 6 ProbaLlon Officer rrozra_n i I UT TRE BOARD 0--:1 SUPERVISORS 0. COITTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALI120,TLTIA In the hatter of ) Complimenting the Office of County Administrator on ) RESOLUTION NO. 73/693 1973-1974 B•adget Preparation_ ) 1-=REAS this Board of Supervisors has concluded its budget deliberations and approved the 1973-1974 County Final Budget; and WHEREAS Supervisor E. A. linscheid noted for the attention of this Board that the Office of County Administrator had spent many creeks and many hours of uncompensated overtire in reviewing department budget requests, in consulting with department represen- tatives on such requests, in checking on thousands of budged, items, in preparing its Budget Message which was adopted by the Board as its 1973-1974 County Proposed Budge L, and in conferences with the Board Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. IT. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) and depart-ment heads for the purpose of developing recommendations on chanes in the approved 1973-1974 County Proposed Budget for detailed review by this Board prior to approving the 1973-1974 County Fina? Budget; and V=REAS Supervisor Linscheid also noted for the attention of the Board that the Office of the County Administrator had reduced the budget total as originally requested by 232, 500,000 and dimin- ished the number of requested positions by more than 500 before presenting its Budget Message to the Board; and 1,IHEREAS Supervisor Linscheid further noted for the attention of the Board that Mr. Fri Fernandez, Assistant to the County Administrator, was a key employee in budget preparation and had performed very meritoriously under time schedule pressures ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY T= BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF T,--ib COUiTTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORITIA ? .SOLITED that it expresses sincere appreciation to the Office of the County Administrator for fine 1973-1974 budget work and extends particular thanks to Mr. Frans Fernandez, Assistant to the County Admidi_strator, for his budget efforts and accomplishments. PASSED A2i-D .1001 TED, this day of September, 1973 by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors T. _ . Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. 14. Dias. NOES: None. ABSEt3T. Sutiervisor J. E. CERTIFIED COPY CC: ::oanry Administrator I certify that this is a full. true & correct copy of the original document which is on file in my office. and that it u•as passed & adopted by the Board of F4urwrvisors of Contra Costa county. California. on the date shown. ATTFST: W.T County Clerk &:ex-officio Clerk of said Boar-cY'oE$upervisors, —- by Deputy Clerk. �� on In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Thursday, August -�Q 19 7T In tha Matter of Retention of Certain: Matters in the Administration and Finance Committee. This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 , the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. Id. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) having submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday , August 28, 1973; and Mr. Sebe Hill , President , Carquinez Coalition, having appeared and urged that federal revenue sharing funds be allocated to implement a low cost public transportation system for the communities of Crockett , Rodeo and Port Costa; and ?Ars . i,?attie Harrison and Mrs . Evelyn Paoli having; also appeared in support thereof; and Sucervisor A. IJ. Dias having recommended that aforesaid matter be retained in the Ad-rinistration and Finance Committee for further consideration ; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the matter of establishment of a central laboratory for sobriety testing services (discussed by the Board on Tuesday , August 28 , 1973) also be retained in said committee for further review; and On motion of Supervisor Linscheid , seconded by Supervisor Boggess , IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED. The foregoing order c-ras passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J . P. Kenny , W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None . ABSENT: Supervisor J . E. Moriarty . 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Congress^ian Jero,;e 1�!aldie Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of 14r. Hill Supervisors Sheri ff-Coroner affixed this iOth day of AucusL , 197? Auditor-Controller W. T. PAASCH, Clerk Board Committee . 'J n t r t;•,r. By_� t � r� cam,- Deputy Clerk Tourette � ncald H 24 5/73-15M i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of ) Administration and Finance Committee ) September 4 , 1973 on Referrals Dealt with by Final ) Budget Recommendations . ) This Board on August 30 , 1973 having; adopted the Final Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 , as recommended by its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) ; and The Administration and Finance Committee having submitted a report this day with respect to a considerable number of items which were referred to it for review in connection with the proposed budget deliberations , and which were dealt with by Final Budget recommendations , to wit : REFERRAL DATE ITEM T2-13-73 Continuation of the Concentrated Burglary Suppression Program by Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner including the staffin7 required to conduct same; 3-13-73 Report of County Administrator entitled "Impact of Reagan-I,-'oretti Tax Shift Bill (SB 90) " ; 4-30-73 Request of Joseph L. Hirsch, O.D. , urging that priority be I'iven in the budget for the 1973-1974 fiscal year to permit a reor':anization of the Human Relations Commission and funding for a full time Director and Secretary ; u5-22-73 Proposed amendment to policy regarding placement of r children under three .years in temporary foster homes , as requested by the Human Resources Director; 5-22-73 Request of Human Resources Director to aut'rorize payment of Group I ATD rate for board and care of certain General Assistance recipients who require supervised care; 5-22-73 Request of Nr. Martin R. Loey that position of Ombudsman be added to county staff; 5-15-73 Allocation of revenue sharir_cr funds for consideration in conjunction ,•iith the cou._ty budF-.et for fiscal ,;tear 1973- 1974 ; 5-22-73 Continued review of Work Furlo7_,;<,h Project in terms of type of facilities , program, and cost of facilities ; 5-29-73 Co"munication from G. W. ?-;att , Office of the Secretary of the Tre?surv , on procedure re�;ardin? general revenue sharing- funds ; 5-29-73 Reauest of San Francisco `,ay Area Ccunc 1 for allocation Of $1 , 000; 61-5-73 Letter f ro^ "Ta»tj nez Huran Pesou_-ces Com..-mission endorsing the nrr�rAij^©(�. 1")T'-1074 '.!/yr / »�. "3,:. !T'J. f?a'� 'et o: t' e Count,% ._uman a.ions ro~--_:-,>icn; REFERRAL DATE ITi!r "'N6-19-73 Matter of Budget !Aessage of the County Administrator for fiscal ,year 1973-1974 ; 6-19-73 Report of Board Hunan Resources Committee on restricted social service pro-rams , for follow-up action; r 6-19-73 County Community Action Prorrra:r. and EOC proposal' for a Count;, Denartment of Community Development, for con- sideration in conjunction with determinations on use of revenue stearin,- funds and the final budget ; re- referred f-rom Human Resources Committee to this committee;. 6-25-73 Disposition of the 14 diminished Social Work Suoervisor i positions , for review in conjunction with the final budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; 7-3-73 Letter from r,?r. Audrey 0. Bustanoby, Walnut Creek, requestint, that applications for revenue sharing funds be carefully examined for excessive administrative costs ; 7-3-73 Communication from Contra Costa Council on Aging requestin,; financial support from Board to continue the countyi.ride Friendly Visitors Program; 7-3-73 Letter from Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pertaining to SB 400 regarding the euthanasia of animals ; 7-24-73 Communication advising that the Superior Court Judges have voted in favor of permanent appointment of Mark Thomas as Juvenile Referee; *7-24-73 Request of Superintendent of Schools for levy of taxes for the maintenance of regional occupational programs ; 7-30-73 Suggestion of r,Ir. Anthony G. Lagiss, Lafayette, that federal revenue sharing funds be used to establish a county museum; g-7-73 Inquiry of Congressman Jerome R. irialdie as to feasibility of Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee obtaining revenue sharing funds ; 7-30-73 Request of Concord Child Care Center for funding day care services for preschool children; 0-14-73 Request for county sponsorship of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program; ( ..Funds -included in Final Budget) On the recomme..dat ion of the Administration and Finance Comm-'ittee, and on motion of Supervisor Borkcess , seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED hat each of the above-stated items is 'r?EMOVED as a committee referral. The foregoing of-der eras pas sed by the f ollo�rins:vvote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny , N. Bog-ess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . IN OE : id;,ne. ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty. w I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of September, 1973. W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Lourette Kincaid Deputy Clerk cc : Board Members Administrator Auditor-Controller Sheriff-Coroner Mr. Hirsch Hunan Resources Director Mr. Loey County Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Council Economic Opportunity Personnel Director Martinez Human Resources Commission County Human Relations Commission Social Services Union, Local 535 Mrs . Bustanoby Conra Costa Council on Aging Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Aninals Agricultural Commissioner Honorable Jackson Davis , Superior Court Judge, Department 5 Probation Officer Superintendent of Schools Mr. La--iss Mr. Cub?ceiotti, Chairman, Advisory Committee, Retired Senior Volunteer Program k n June 19, 1973 Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) Clerk of the Board (by Sandra Stimler, Deputy Clerk) 1973-1974 BUDGET MESSAGE of the County Administrator The Board today referred to you the BUDGET MESSAGE of the County Administrator for fiscal year 1973-1974• ss Attachment cc: County Administrator .._ -.:.. _a.. .. ,..,.:. _.ry..a YJ? .ti `'r :.pn+ •�,t, .._ ., ,r*5F$ 5f k^ 4; Om" In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 19 19 Y3L- In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of 1973-1974 Budget Message of the County Administrator. The County Administrator having submitted his BUDGET MESSAGE for the fiscal year 1973-1974; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P . Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said BUDGET MESSAGE is ACKNOWLEDGED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said BUDGET MESSAGE is APPROVED as the basis for the preparation and issuance by the County. Auditor-Controller of the 1973-1974 Proposed County Budget; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the BUDGET MESSAGE is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) . the Board:The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered cn the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrator Supervisors Board Committee affixed this 19th day of June , 19 73 .W. L PAASCH, Clerk By, Deputy Clerk Sandra timler H 24 7/72-15M �s ., r► IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Report of ) Administration and Finance Committee ) September 4, 1973 on Referrals Dealt :with by Final ) Budget Recommendations . ) ) This Board on August 30 , 1973 having adopted the Final Budget for fiscal ,year 1973-1974 , as recommended by its Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) ; and The Administration and Finance Committee having submitted a report this day with respect to a considerable number of items which were referred to it for review in connection with the proposed budget deliberations , and which were dealt :with by Final Budget recommendations , to Twit : REFERRAL DATE ITEM *2-13-73 Continuation of the Concentrated Burglary Suppression_ Program by Office of the County Sheriff-Coroner including the staffing required to conduct same; 3-13-73 Report of County Administrator entitled "Impact of Reagan.-Voretti Tax Shift Bill (SB 90) " ; 4-30-73 Request of Joseph L. Hirsch , O.D. , urging that priority be given in the budget for the 1D73-1974 fiscal year to permit a reorganization of the Human Relations Commission and funding for a full time Director and Secretary; '5-22-73 Proposed amendment to policy regarding placement of children under three .years in temporary foster homes , as requested by the Human Resources Director; 5-22-73 Reauest of Human Resources Director to authorize payment of Groun I ATD rate for board and care of certain General Assistance recipients who require supervised care; 5-22-73 Request of T.7r. 'rartin R. Loey that position of Ombudsman be added to county staff; 5-15-73 Allocation of revenue sharing, funds for consideration in conjunction with the county budget for fiscal yea� 1973- 1974 ; 5-2L 73 Continued review of Work Furlou„h Project in terms of type of facilities , program, and cost of facilities ; 5-29-73 Com-rurication from G. 1:`. 1•latt , Office of the Secretary Cf t^_ Treasury , on procedures regarding- general revenue s.?arinF -funds ; 5-'9 Reauest of San. Francisco Bav Area Council for allocation of $1 , 000 ; -5-73 better frog- artj.nez Human 1�ASource5 Cor'rtis_ion endorsing tri' r.r ice7,, .,i J 1 4 .'1rirv. of the Cour`;✓ 1 u,:�ar. ?r�at .ors Co-:'iSsiG.i; . REFERRAL DATE ITEM 6-19-73 Matter of Budget Nessage of the County Administrator for fiscal ,year 1973-19711 ; 6-19-73 Report of Board Human Resources Committee on restricted social service programs , for follow-up action; 6-19-73 County Community Action. Program and EOC proposal for a County Department of Co.-nmunity Development, for con- sideration in conjunction with determinations on use of revenue sharing funds and the final budget ; re- referred from-Tuman Resources Committee to this comr..ittee; 6-25-73 Disposition of the 14 diminished Social ?Mork Supervisor I positions , for review in conjunction with the final budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 ; 7-3-73 Letter from "r. Audrey 0. Bustanoby, Walnut Creek, requesting that applications for revenue sharing funds be carefully examined for excessive administrative costs ; 7-3-73 Communication from Contra Costa Council on Aging requesting; financial support from Board to continue the countywide ''riendly Visitors Program; *7-3-73 Letter from Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pertaining to SB 400 regarding the euthanasia of animals ; 7-24-73 Communication advising that the Superior Court Judges have voted in favor of permanent appointment of Park Thomas as Juvenile Referee; �'7-24-73 Request of Superintendent of Schools for levy of taxes for the maintenance of regional occupational programs ; 7-30-73 Suggestion of Mr. Anthony G. Lagiss, Lafayette, that federal revenue sharing funds be used to establish a county museum; X13-7-73 Inquiry of Congressman Jerome R. Waldie as to feasibility , : of Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee obtaining revenue sharing funds ; 7-30-73 Request of Concord Child Care Center for funding day care services for preschool children; 3-14-73 Request for county sponsorship of the Retired Senior Volunteer Program; (-Funds included in Final Budget) On the recommendation of the Administra`ior and Finance CoTrittee, and on motion of Supervisor Borrc*ess , seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that each of the above-stated items is OV :D as a committee referral. The foregoing order was passed by the -following vote : AYES : Supervisors J . P. Kenny , W. N. Bon-ess, E. A. Linscheid, A. "7. Dias . i:OES : None. ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty. i I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of September, 1973. W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Lourette Kincaid Deputy Clerk cc : Board Members Administrator Auditor-Controller Sheriff-Coroner Mr. Hirsch Human Resources Director Mr. Loey County Counsel San Francisco Bay Area Council Economic Opportunity Personnel Director Martinez Human Resources Commission County human Relations Commission Social Services union, Local 535 Mrs . Bustanoby Conra Costa Council on Aging Contra Costa Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Aninals Agricultural Commissioner Honorable Jackson. Davis , Superior Court Judge, Department 6 Probation Officer Superintendent of Schools Mr. Lagiss Mr. Cubiccictti, Chairman, Advisory Committee, Retired Senior Volunteer Program CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Inter - Office Memo Date: August 7, 1973 To: Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) From: Clerk of the Board Subject: The Board today referred to you an inquiry from Congressman Jerome R. Waldie regarding feasibility of Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee receiving revenue sharing funds. ep ccs County Administrator I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California August 7 19 7 In the Matter of Inquiry with respect to Revenue Sharing Funds . This Board having received a July 27, 1973 letter from Congressman Jerome R. Waldie inquiring as to the feasibility of the Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee receiving revenue sharing funds; and On motion of Supervisor J. P. Kenny, seconded by Supervisor E. A . Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said letter is REFERRED to its Administration and Finance Committee ( Supervisor W. N. Boggess and Supervisor Linscheid) . The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors Carquinez Coalition affixed this 7th day of August , 19 73L Steering Committee W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Elsie Pi 01tt H 24 5/73-15M i f JEROME R. WALD[E COMMITTEES: MEMBER OF CONGRESS JUDICIARY 14TH DISTRICT,CALIFORNIA POST OFFICE AND CML SERVICE OuwmAN OF S&MCOMmITTEE ON WASHINGTON ADDRESS: �Ot�gre�� of tieIYitebtate� Rr„REmExr.EALTH BENEFITS ImsuRAmm Room Room 408 SELECT COMMITTEE ON CRIME CANNON HOUSE OrrlCZ BUILDING WAsmjHaToN.D.C. 20515 30owe of Rortoentatibeg DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE PHONE,225-5511 E.A."PAT"FERousoN AREA CODE,202 Wa0ittoWn,M.C. 20515 805 P.O. ���RaT MARTINEZ.CAurORNIA 9455$ PHoNE:229-1974 July 27, 1973 ARFA Com 415 RICHMOND Omm P.O.Box 1186 PosT Orvwx Bu1LDINo 11TH AND NmN STRErm RICHMOND.CAuFORNIA 94002 PHoNe:233-4425 Supervisor Al Dias, Chairman Board of Supervisors - Contra Costa County Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Dear Al: I have been contacted by Mr. Sebe Hill, President, Carquinez Coalition Steering Committee, 525 Second Street, Rodeo, California 94572, relative to their desire to obtain revenue-sharing funds to get their project underway. Their motiv% appear to be most commendatory, and I should like to take this opportunity to express my interest in their behalf. May I hear from you ag to the feasibility of their obtaining funds for their program? Sincerely yours, "L4,4- JEROME R. WALDIE United States Congressman Fourteenth District JRW:afs JUL / tib V. Y. Pr1Q ; ^ !t ec�t::y s IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Adopted County ) September 4, 1973 Budget for the 1973-1974 Fiscal ) Year and Directive to Department ) Heads on Fiscal Limitations. ) The Board having concluded action on the county budget for the 1973-1974 fiscal year following an extensive and thorough review of county programs and services and the necessary financing related thereto; and The Board having determined the program of public services to be provided by county government for the 1973-1974 fiscal period and the property taxes necessary to support said program through the adoption of the county budget; and The Board having determined that increasing financial pressure is being exerted upon county government by reductions in financial assistance from the federal and state governments for traditional county programs and services and by the imposition of legal restraints (Senate Bill 90) on further property tax rate increases; and The desire of the Board being that all departments operate within approved budget appropriations and that savings be effected wher— ever possible, accordingly all department heads are DIRECTED to: 1. Operate as economically and efficiently as possible; 2. Refrain from actions to expand or intensify the level of services or to initiate any new programs until such proposals have been submitted to the Office of County Administrator for review and analysis and authorization is granted by the Board; 3 . Submit all applications for federal or state finan— cial assistance to continue existing or to establish new projects and programs to the Office of County Administrator for review and analysis and for approval by the Board prior to submission to state and federal authorities; and On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor W. N. Boggess, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Clerk of the Board is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this order to each department head for compliance with the provisions contained herein; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that county officials are reminded of their personal liability for expenditures made or liabilities incurred in excess of budget appropriations, pursuant to Government Code Section 29121; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that department heads are DIRECTED to follow the provisions of Administrative Bulletin Number 4, which sets forth the administrative procedures to be followed for the expansion of existing programs or services or the establishment of all new programs or services. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty. cc: All Departments I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the 4th of September, 1973 • Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 4th day of September, 1973 - W. T. PAASCH, CLERK By Z&V�� DorotMy L acini Deputy Clerk . , � l In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Thursday, August 30 1973_ In the Matter of Adoption of County Special Districts Budgets and County Service Area Budgets and Special School Levy for Fiscal Year 1973-19711 . The County Auditor-Controller on August 20, 1973 having presented to the Board a schedule of budget adjustments , incorporating changes in the proposed budgets (approved by this Board July 17 , 1973) for County Special Districts (exclusive of county fire protection districts) , County Service Areas , and Special School Levy (Regional Occupational Centers) ; and The Board having conducted hearings on aforesaid budgets and recommended adjustments relating thereto; NO11, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor J . P. Kenny, seconded by Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the public hearing is CLOSED on Special Districts Budgets , County Service Area Budgets and Special School Levy , the adjustments as presented are APPROVED, and said budgets are ADOPTED by this Board for fiscal ,year 1973-19711 , as follows : (type in Special Districts Budgets) The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. 11. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None . ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Sunt . of Schools Supervisors Auditor--Controller affixed this 30th day of August , 1973 Administrator i W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk �o_�rette 'incai H 24 5/73-15M a.. �....;r ; I , •1�• f•)QNAA1 FUNK DCVI.^•IOt: SU^LItV tSORS INTERNAL AUDIT DC:.LLD L. 172OUCHET AUDITOR-CONTROLLER. OI=FICE JOHN A. AYLARD F ut.I:.T:.NT Au D11'VR•C0NTROL!rr. j TAX AI1L SFECIAL CONI i RA COSTA COUN'�'JT DISTRICT K ACCOL'tdT1YG SAM KItt0:0 FINANCE BUILD:NG ACCOUNTING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94555 ROY a. a.C= PURCHASING PHONZ 141!5) 2213.3000 WALTER A. SEYDEN SYSTEMS ANTHUR T. S1URGESS August 217, 1973 DATA PROCESSING GLEN TAYLGR Z. t • 4 7171-1973 Superviser James P. Kenny, District I ,, p „ „ Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District 2 � ; N. T. � `'A S v{1 ^. RD OF SUPSCVlSCRS i' Supervisor James E. Moriarty, District 3 t COi.P17 RA COSTA CO. Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District 4 ....... :,. L- Me-putv Supervisor Edmujid A. L•inscheid, District 5 'J Inclosed is material covering recomnended charges for adoption of final bud,ets. These are fov County Special Districts other than fixe districts. The preliminary bu3gets for these districts were adopted on July 20, 1973. The sc7ledules include districts I requirements for expenditurCs, revenue miter than taxes, and estimated 1973-74 tax rate compared to actual 10.72-73 tax rate. These: budgets must be adopted by your board on or before August act, 1973. H. DONALD F11:N1, Auditor-Controller 11DF:kt Enclosures County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget Available A r.ou n'.. to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Vs Expenai- Total 1972- ?;i;S- ture 972- ture Total Tax Est. Tax 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd-. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy mWit P a t e Pat a 1. PRO'rEcTION TO PERSONS PROPERTY County Service Area - Fire Area F-1, South Richmond 3,568 3,568 313 3,235 .953 955 Area F-3, Antioch 139,466 139,466 24,042 115,424 21 ,724 .450 .4_50 Area F-4, Pittsburg 44,299 44,299 8,362 35,937 4 ,273 i F, .4 5 rl, .450 Total County Service Area Fire 187,333 187,333 32,737 154,596 26 ,002 Flood Control Districts Ff id Control (i Stater Conservation 1,046,458 1,046,458 660,841 385,617 23,997 361 ,620 U 2 C. 1')70 224,404 -1,SS3 i. Flood Control Zone Iftl 224,404 173,406 50,998 1,66S 4- 1 IM Flood Control '"one 2 31,571 31,571 31,571 Floud Contral Zone #33 4,866,664 4,866,664 . 3,766,614 1,100,050 52,300 l,64 7 Flood Cow-rol Zone 97 176,331 176,331 149,852 26,479 2,457 ,101 .2 Flood Control Zone V3 12,10S 12,105 9,444 2,661 90 S 7 1 .03;1 Flood Control Zone s1 SA 27,894 27,894 21,213 6,676 2)19 Flood Control Zone #9 31 ,746 33,746 25,104 8,642 253 FIGod, Control Zone #9A 108,782 103.4782 80,647 28,135 874 1..7 ..161. .14v Total Flood Control Districts 6,527,955 6,S27,9S5 4,918,697 1,609,253 82,355 Stora Drainage Districts Zone #1 .- CIO 5,728 5,728 5,728 :.one x;10 1 go$4 09 190,409 141,347 49,062 483 13 104,413 104,413 76,570 27,848 302 _150 2,0 65 43 2 2 34 1 L�. =one �16 43)(1103 43,603 21,538 2 Zone #16, Debt Service 17,269 5,238 2_,S07 4,282 13)2125 69 1516 1f; i one 19 1,761 1,761 1,761 :one 67,716 67,716 67,716 r;77 99,877 99,377 82,648 17,229 Total Storm Drainaae Districts 530,781 5,238 536,019 401 ,590 134,429 1 ,87? 1 i-! • County Sp--cial Distrim:s 1973-74 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Est . Lxl;endi- Total Seca . 1972- I373- ture Total Tax Est . Tat 1973 1971 Appropri- General Require- Require- L'nsecd.. Reo}iii rc- 'Fax Tax ,)istrict atiott Reserve n,ents ments Levy me.,t Pat fate _. I'Itc)"I'i:C"CIO:; TO PEP.SONS ; PROPERTY (Cont'd) 1'. ,,*to-m Drain t.1aintenance Districts � _ Istrict .r'1 546,719 546,719 416,05S 130,661 2,333 128,.323 .500 ,300 Uia;rict iI 27,158 27,153 19,30,6 7,352 274 7,773 .040 ,040 "Total Stor-m Drain Maintenance Districts 573,577 573,877 435,364 135,513 2,612 135,901 y Con i-A y Service Area - Drainage .r<:i t)-2, i�llnut Creck 67,113 67,413 67,413 `iL!a D-3, Antioch 40,962 40,962 40,962 Area D-12, Sana„Lound :acres 2 ,597 _ 2,597 1,475 1 ,122 51 1-,071 .211 .214 Total County Service Area - rainage 110,972 110,972 109,550 1 ,122 51 1 ,071 Count-v Service Arca - Police Ar : - P-i, Crock -Valona 1x,952 8,952 2,969 5,957 134 5, x 19 .10y .105 ica P-2, Danville-Ala,-no 62,108 62,108 10,746 48,023 I ,I40 1G,S33 .067 ,067* Area P-4, Orirda 59,108 59,108 7,Uz7 49,789 887 43 ,()012 .054 .08.1* Area I'-a, Roi.md'nill Area .30,400 30.-100lU 1?5 10,525 _ 41) "� ,IS 00 Total County Service area - Police 160,56S 160i568 11,477 314 320 2 ,161 112 ,15.^i ter_ ---- TtY,'.1I. Pi;OTECTION TO PERSONS I'ROPEDTY SLC)91,486 5 ,238 8 ,096,724 5 909 ,715 2 IS2 ,233 115 ,051 2,nG?, I;;7 '-!:-,;ti! ated Tax Rate is Reduced to 1972-73 T L< Rate : a Paue 3 County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes t Est. Expendi- -�' Total Secd. 1972- 1973- ture Total Tax 1st. Tax 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Llnsecd-. Requirt;- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy meat Late hate f L't' .T11 ICND SANITATION S,trization Districts ' A l.jistrzct •3, Uec Service 11,394 233,952 245$ 16 2450346 District P5 13,345 13,848 13,848 i?istrict Debt Service 1,532 808 2,340 2,340 District ?r7A 817,211 36,009 353,220 672,436 180,784 1 ,693 179,091 1 .20' 1 .20; r. District 7�7A, Capital Outlay 189,530 189,530 189,530 District 97%x, Debt Service 27,759 27 ,759 7,237 20,472 65 30,407 .05 •IS2 Eistrict 07B 12,171 2,607 14,778 14 ,773 District I'7B, Debt Service 16 ,600 16,600 10,939 5,661 5,{ f>1 7.970 District 17.15 3,687 3,687 3,637 District 1'.19 80,822 111,008 90,830 90,S30 Total Sanitation District 1,174,554 233,384 1 ,457,938 1 ,251 ,021 206,917 1 ,758 205,159 (County Service Arca - Sc,,ti:er Sand;;:ound Slough 411 411 411 ".rca S-2, Oakley 7,371 _ 7 ,371 7,371 ® -'1'ot�l Count} Service Area Sewer 7,72 _ 7 ,753 7,732 +` TOTAL HE ALTI I i, SAk\IT TION .1 ,142,336 283,384 1 ,165 ,720 1 ,258,803 206,917_ 1 ,758 ISS 205 1�9 `t lfli;lII.AYS % BRIDGES Service Arco- - Lighting _ -,fres L-a? , !!c�:ain�*,tcn 18,093 18 ,092 4,962 13,130 72 13,053 OS5 t�=::: Area L-41, ,cst County 66,824 60,824 17,595 43,229 601 42,623 ,•. v 35,903 10,895 25,008 657 2.1 ,.351 .1Sti 1 ,.'.-ea L-42, ,corgi Central Count, SS,903 X' '? Y 1 k r y S i. 5 49 �r County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget E' Available iU:ount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes { Expendi- Tot 1 197 t a Scccl. I�72- 1 �73- tore Total Tax Est. Tax 1073 1971 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd, Require- Tax Tax Ij strict ation Reserve ments ments Levy ment Rate Irate ' IlI .i C';\YS F BRIDGES (Cont'd) Scrvicc 'trea - I.i;:ding (Cont'd) L-43, 1';est Pittsburg0 ittsburg 35,416 35,416 10,795 24,621 724 23, 7 .210, 210 W,e:z L-415, South �uentral County 66,712 66,741 20,626 46,116 I6 778 ' >� ' , , x ,538 .OS_ .03- AI%_! z L-46, :;arthwe;t County 34,357 34,357 10,064 24 ,293 802 2.3,4'.91 .19S .135 Total County Service :area - I.i 251,3.34 251 334 74,937 176,397 3,634 17?"763 CL)u::ty S ryice Arca - Miscellaneous i'f-1, Delta Fc•rry 17,638 17,638 322 17 ,316 615 LC. ,?�i 1 .0? > 1 . 126 �z i;:z '•1- , Rol lin_ :ooct 7,466 7,4G6 2,496 4 ,970 70 4 ,a?:' .1:%_' .1.72 yrs r :. :,1-I , Sat ,.):? 57,126 57,126 19,390 37,736 872 36 1SL) if>7 lrc:rz :1-G, Danvil' 12,632 , G,61 632 1'' 632 n 6011 30 1.7' � � , ,=':11 . ' 17' ond 9,491 9,491 2,799 6,692 4,12 G,. S(1 .I )7 ..197 :r a ' -3, L'yra-z 5,144 5,34=1 566 I,77S 3 144 S,144 2, :roa .;-), OrinLi. 2,544 Ara -11 , Ctrl?.ca Area 25,043 28,043 3,452 24,51;1 4,291 14,1S6 14,16 4 ,877 9,509 1,357 •_,:, 7��3 1.5 ':� ;:c: -1,;!-i ad 457 457 179 273 ::7i1 ". -1•l, Ci.aytc,:: 2,302 2,502 748 1,554 15 1 ,539 .09. 4 .t,�'•1 ,\z v z ..:-15, -nac i ;al lev 476 476 476 \rctt `t-10, t1 yJ1 c ��ea 3,615 3,615 1 ,6S5 1,930 20 1 ,f)w .32G .326 .rc,c -17, i:z :Iaror (Former R-1) 47,109 47,100 13,168 33,941 473 3a0,46 .250 250 ,"rea `1-19, Cori??u% ;,o:,ds, 254 254 254 ".rca ':-20, I;odi�o lrea _ 0,239 6,239 6,230 Total County Area - >•'isccllancou 214,522 214,522 68,413 146.109 8,106 1372013 r :i _ r PzCe S � ' ^ County Special Districts , 1973-74 Final Budget A-vailable Mount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes . I.-St . -'x---- I972- lO73_ i Total � 7o�ul �u� Est . Tax l973 l97� � ^°�� Appropri- General Require- Require- Unaacd, I'1cqtiirc- Tax Tax � � i/jstrict utiou Reserve ouunts mont s Levy ��ut �u10 Du�e r ^ !|l:\l�&Y3 F, BRIDGES [Coot`d) � � CnunC Si mu Road Uaintmouooa � l 7�O 17«47 1J087 653 3 ( .'0 .091 .09i ��. . ..~_^° ..^� ..^`~ �_ �_ �. ` Total County Service Area - ' iuumd >L1iotonaucu 17»40 1 ,740 1J087 653 3 6�O � iiI(--,HVAYS DKIDGES 467 �E.646759x6 144�437 323�159 Il �%33 3Il �326 � ` ! !i:U[JTlUX ( - Cnxnt Service Area kuorcatinu ' ----'�� 475,574 475,574 374"885 108,689 3,S62 97^l27 � .%�D ,�S0 ' Ai-ca R-5'' South Danville I0,930 10,330 4*956 5,974 ? 5 ,D67 ,2O6 ^306 � � up 11-60rindo 234)7Y}8 2347Y08 169�574 65�134 1 .105 G� ,0 2 .lOO .lOO ' KZCR;A�IO@ 721,212 721 ,212S49,415 I7I "797 4��74 l87'I2J � � Cn c iX Lil)rary � � ^ a 63"038 4l,287 31 ,771 480 21 ,285 .1011) ,100 10 ' ',1 Sobrante 63,038 2*7l� 61 ,060 ,150 .l50' ` 1 , % 62,997 1 ,927 .\r�z LIF�-ll . Oakley 3,077 3^077 3,077 � Aruu LID-12^ �oruO � a IO7,l�4 l07^I24 46"7ll 80^4l3 �,l�7 58 ,276 .l�D ,l� , Area LIB-13, Yuouoio Valley 1722,260 172 ,260 91 ,046 81 ,214 1 ,972 79�242 .lOO .lOU 43l����l99 431 ,199 204,814.2D4� _�[l4 226,385 6,5222l9 8�� --_�� _________ . ~ ^ ' ' ^ Pagc 6 • County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget Available Amount Lo Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes _ Est , Expendi_ Total Sect!. 1972- 1973- Lure Total Tax Est . Tax 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Requirc- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy meat Rate Rate Contra Costa County Water Agency 309,764 309,764 129,230 150,534 11,910 168,62:1 .010 .010 TOTAL .1 'L L'LI„�.`�EOUS 309,764 309,764 129,230 180,534 11 ,910 165 ,624 G[::L\D TOTAL 11,203,593 283,622 11 ,492,215 5,196,411 3,391 ,030 151 ,7.18 3 ,13:)=:',12 County Special Districts Page 7 1973-74 Final Budget n Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Expendi- Total Secd. 1972- 1973- ture Total Tax Est. Tax 1973 191-4 j Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve merits ments Levy Vent Rate Rate_ !'C�oioral Occupational Centers 125,938 125,938 � 74,344 51,594 2,807 48,787 .002 ,003 ® Total 125,938 125,938 74,344 51,594 2,807 45,787 --r— s ._—_.,7 87 rs j, t= This budget is provided under Education Code Section 7456 and is as requested by the County Superintendent of Schools. .r COUNTY OF COLNT^A COSTA Office of Auditor-Cont;•oller DISTRICTS GOVERNED THROUGH BOARD OF SUPkRVISORS (Outer than fire Districts) Comparison of 1972-73 Budgets, Tax Levy and Tax Rates with 1973-74 Final Budgets, Talc Levy and Estimated Tax Rate 1972-73 1973-74 Final Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate PROTECTION TO PERSONS £ PROPERTY 41ty Service Area - Fire F-1, South Richmond 3,725 3,322 .953 3,563 3,235 .953 F-3, ;Ultioch 127,4SS 86,438 .450 139,466 93,700 .4.50 F-4, Pittsburg 43,594 33,756 .450 44,299 31,659 .450 Total County Service Area - Fire _174,774 123,516 137,333 12,13 S9.1 lood Control Districts ilnod Control t& Plater Conservation 1,267,296 344,484 .020 1,046,458 30)1 ,620 ,020 i lood Control Zone 1 197,659 49,267 .180 '24,=104 49,333 .180 t Flood Control Zone 2 313,0,04 10,899 .180 31 ,571 IoControl Zone 3B 5,373,612 927,727 .150 4,S66,664 1,047 ,256 .150 Floor! Control Zone 7 149,6S5 24,542 .100 176,331 24,022 ,100 Flood Control Zone S 11 ,877 2,619 .030 12,10-, 2,571 .030 Flood Control Zone 8A 66,222 6,527 .100 27,994 6,457 .10111 F Flood Coiitrol Zone 9 25,580 8,533 ,040 33,716 8,35:) .040 Iood Control Zone 9A 78,031 27 ,37'- .140 1003 ,70-2 27,261 ,140 Total Flood Control Districts 7,457,936 1 ,406,370 6,527,955 1 ,52 Y.U, ' Storm Drainage Districts Zonc: 1 5,728 5,729 �. Z01"e 10 159,197 45,623 .350 190,409 4S,r7? ,35n Zone 13 83,479 27,103 .2SO 104,418 27,516 .250, , Zone '-6 48 ,426 10,394 .1.14 4.5,603 22,022 1��2 Zone 16, Construction 9,92 Zone 16, Debt Service 23,114 17,520 .276 22,507 18,156 ,158 Zone 19 1 ,76.L! 1 ,761 Zo�:e :2 72,665 67,716 �o1:C 77. 66 OS 3 _12 723 .350 9r ,b7? 16,�ti 1 .35(1 ' -- Total Storer Drainage Districts �T70,__ 2 113,$73 ____ S36 .01? 132 ,359 -2- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 1973-74 Final Secured Tax Sinai--Secure .mate District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy `l'-i.\ Rate Storm Drain ;Maintenance Districts District 1 386,570 100,739 .300 546,719 128,323 ,300 District 4 22,024 7,708 ,040 27,158 7,575 ,040 Total Storm Drain Maintenance District 408,594 108,447 57:3 ,877 135 ,901 County Service Area - Drainage Area D-'?, P;alnut Creek 65,000 67,413 Wrea D-•3, Antioch 44,000 40,962 Area D-12, Sandmound Acres 1 ,250 1 ,175 .214 2,597 1 ,071 .21.4 Total County Service Area - Drainage 110,250 1 ,175 110,972 1 ,071 County Service Area - Police Area P-1, Crockett-Valona 8,615 6,140 .108 8,952 5,849 ,108 Area P-2, Danville-Alamo 57,580 44,444 .067 62 ,1.08 46,883 ,067 Area P-4, Orinda 55,000 50,906 .084 59,108 48,902 .04 Arca P-S, Roundhill Area - 30,400 40,525 .800 Total County Service Area - Police 121 ,195 101 ,490 160,565 1-12,1-1 TOTAL P120TECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY 8,773,331 1,854,871 8,096,724 2 ,067,1107 y ! E^.L'1'11 F, SAi,ITATION enitation Districts District 3, Debt Service 245,563 245,346 District S 13,379 13,548 District 5, Debt Service 4,058 2,340 District 7A 1,240,053 141,694 1 .207 85.3,220 179,091 1 .207 District 7A, Capital Outlay Reserve 181 ,163 1£9,530 District 7A, Debt Service 23,622 4,702 .053 27,759 20,107 ,182 District 713 9 .087 14 ,778 District 7B, Debt Service 22,597 16,6001 5,661. 7 ,970 District 15 3,917 3,687 District 19 53,806 90,830 Total Sanitation Districts 1,802,745 146 396 1 ti 9,, 235,1 i i ,=,.7 ,_ 3.3 _ i -3- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire District.;) 1972-73 1073-74 Final' Secured Tax Final Secured Estimated` District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Taff Levy Tax Rate County Service Area - Sewer Area c-1 , Sandmound Slough 411 411 Area. S-2, Oakley 7,370 7 ,371 Total County Service Area - Sewer 7,751 7,782 TOTAL PEALTH ; SANITATION 1 ,810,526 146,396 1 ,465 ,720 0 HIC;HWAYS & BRIDGES County Service Area - Lighting Area L-32, Kensington 16,239 13,307 .085 18 ,092 13,05E .085 Area r,-41, Wcst County 57,741 44,36-1 .134 60,824 12,625 .134 Area L-42, North Central County 30,512 25,212 .156 35,903" 24 ,351 .156 Area L-43, 1':est Pittsburg 30,770 22,965 .210 35,416 2;1,8.)7 .210 Area L-45, South Central County 68,169 36,570 .082 66,742 45,33S .082 =s r Area L-46, Northi•rest County 32,466 25,376 .198 34 ,357 23,491 .198 Total County Service Area - Lighting 235,897 153,291 251 ,33; 172,763 County Service Area - Miscellaneous Area 1-1 , Dclta Ferry 17,238 16,720 1 .926 17,638 16,701 1 .926 Arca %1-3, Ro11ingwood 7,089 5,37=2 .172 7,466 4 ,392 .172 O4rea 11-4, San Ramon 47,217 37,814 .180 57,126 30,8611 .180 rea :;-6, i:anville 13,939 4,593 .172 22,652 5 ,98 , .172 rea :•1-7, North ltic',.,iond 3,705 6,266 .197 9,491 6,250 .197 Area :i-fi, Byro;: 3,646 E,144 Area :1 9, 0rinda 2,130 1,551 .144 2,344 1,775 .144 Area c1-11, Crincla Area 22,743 19,729 .535 28 ,o"13 20,30 .535 Area :•1-12, E1 Sobrante 13,750 7,414 .763 1 ,186 7,95- .763 v ",rea :d-Ia, Bethel Island 437 2S6 .359 457 278 .359 Area :"1-14 , Clayton 2,305 812 .094 2,302 1 ,539 .094 Area :1-15, Y nacio Vallcy 9 A,6 476 Area '.1-10, Clyde Arca 2,647 2,420 .326 3 .615 1,910 .526 .rca :,i-17, Montalvin Manor (Formerly R-1) 47,109 33,468 .250 Area `•1-19, Orinda ;'!nods 2541 •1-20, Radco Area 6 ,239 Total Count, Service Area - Miscellaneous 142,796 102,927 -5 14 ,522 i1i7,91 E ri,v r i -4- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1.972-73 1.973-74 Final Secured Tax F nal Secured EstinritecT District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax Rate County Servico Area - Road Maintenance Area RD-1, Muir Oaks 1,082 699 .091 1,740 650 .091 Total County Service Area-Road Maintenance 13,082 699 1,740 y 63 TOAL HIGI"tWAYS $ BRIDGES 379,775 271,917 467,596 311 ,326 l2ECIZL-'ATI ON County Service Area - Recreation Area R-1, Montalvin idanor (Successor M-17) 43,996 35,529 .250 Area R-4, ,!oraga .174,799 96,504 .250 475,574 97,127 ,250 Area R-5, South Danville 5,595 5,227 .250 10,930 5,967 ,206 Area R-6, Or.inda 70,199 60,1S1 .100 234,705 61,029 ,100 T(i'1L PJI"C11EAT ION 294,589 197,441 721,212 167,123 IiFl. 1CAT I0;•I County Service Area - Library .a. Area LIB-2, E1 Sobrante 85,596 21 ,443 .1.00 63,033 21,285 ,100 Area LIB-5, Pleasant Hill 1,887 9-ea LIB-10, Pinole 98,571 61,686 .150 85,700 61 ,060 .150 Area LIB-11, Oakley 3,076 3,077 Area LIB-12, '.!oraga 79,629 S7,902 .150 107,124 58,276 .150 Area LIB-13, Ygnacio Valley 120,970 59,152 ,100 1%2,260 79,242 .100 TOTAL EDUCATION 369,731 200,1.83 451,199 219,563 Af1SoCELLLANE 0US Co .tra Costa County Water Agency 289,217 171,794 ,010 309 .764 169,624 ,010 TOTAL ',1I SCI:LL' jV4E-OUS 259.217 171,7?=1 309,761? 168 ,624 GP.AND TOTAL 11,937,169 2,343,602 11 ,192,215 3 ,1 i -1- OFFICE OF COUNTY AUDITOR-CO,,iMJLLER Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Recommended Budget 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General • Services & Supp?ies 3,390 3,390 Reserve for Contingencies 178 _ 178 Total Requirements 3,568 3 Sob F-3 (Antioch Area) General Services & Supplies 113,500 113,500 Fixed Assets 25,205 25,205 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 239 761 Total Requirements 139,705 239 1.39,466 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Sertiices & Supplies 42,400 42,400 Fixed Assets 559 S g Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 340 1,311.13 Total Requirements 43,959 340 44,299' `1'o adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. A -2- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Flood Control Contra Costa Flood Control & Water Conservation General Services & Supplies 1,047,500 3,542 1,043,958 Fixed Assets 2,500 2,500 Reserve for Contingencies 60,590 60,c!-'0 Total Requirements 1,110,590 64,132 1,046,458 To adjust budget as requested by district and to maintain desired tax rate. Zone I (Marsh Creek) General Services & Supplies 86,000 86,000 Fixed Assets 131,000 131,000 Reserve for Contingencies 7,256 148 7,40_4 Total Requirements 224,256 148 224,404 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Services & Supplies 2,000 2,000 mi Fixed Assets 27,500 27,500 Reserve for Contingencies 1,783 288 2,071 Total Requirements 31,283 288 31 .1 571 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 3B (Central County) General Services k1l Supplies 541,000 541,000 Other Charges 28,000 23,000 Fixed Assets 3,858,000 3,853,000 Reserva for Contingencies 359,011 80,653 439,664 Total Requirements 4,786,011 80,653 4,866,664 To adjust budget as requestei by district and to maintain desired tax rate. 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease ' Budget Flood Control (Continued) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Services & Supplies 30,000 30,000 Fixed Assets 139,000 139,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,591 r 1,740 7,331 Total Requirements 174,591 1,740 176,331 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax 'rate. 41 Zone VO (Pinole Creek) General Services & Supplies 11,000 11,000 Reserve for Contingencies 506 599 1 ,105 Total Requirements 11,506 599 12,105 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Subzone 3A General Fixed Assets 23,000 2,359 25,359 Reserve for Contingencies 2,151 384 2,535 Total. Requirements 25,151 2,743 27,E94 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 9 (Rodeo C:,:eek) General Services & Supplies 25,000 5,679 30,679 Reserve for Contingencies 2,456 611 3,067 Total Requirements 227,456 6,290 33,746 To adjust budget t-c maintain desired tax rate. SL,bzone 9A General Fixed Assets 98,000 1,348 99,348 Reserve fc;r Contin-encias 5$389 4,045 9,454 C, Total Requirements 103,389 5,393 103,732 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. -4- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage Zone #1 (Lafayette Valley Estates) General Other Charges 500 500 Fixed Assets 5,200 5,200 Reserve for Contingencies 28 28 Total Requirements 5,728 5,728 Zone #10 (West of Danville) General • Services & Supplies S00 500 Fixed Assets 65,500 107,099 172,599 Reserve for Contingencies 4,711 12,599 17,310 Total Requirements 70,711 119,698 190,409 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. `Lone #13 (North & West of Alamo) Ceneral Fixed Assets 60,000 33,926 93,926 Other Charges 1,000 1,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,852 5,640 9,492 Total Requirements 64,852 39,566 104,418 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. 'Lone 016 (Gregory Gardens) General Otter Charges 2,000 2,000 Fixed Assets 29,000 8,639 37,639 Reserve for Contingencies 8,127 4,163 3,964 Total Requirements 39,127 8,639 4,:.03 433,603 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone '716 (Gregory Gardens) Debt Service Other Charges 17,269 17,269 General Reserve _ 5,238 _ 5,238 Total Requirements 22,507 22,507 1973-74 1973-•74 Proposed Final . Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Stcrm Drainage (Continued) Zone P19 (North Richmond Area) General Services & Supplies 250 250 Fixed Assets 1,450 1,450 Reserve for Contingencies 61 61 Total Requirements 1,761 1,761 Zone #22 (N.E. Ygnacio Valley) General • Fixed Assets 65,000 65,000 Reserve for C:mtingencies 2,819 103 2,716 Total Requirements 67,819 103 67,716 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 977 (West Sherman Area) General Other Charges 5,000 5,000 Fixed :assets 89,000 89,0d0 Reserve for Contingencies 3,956 1,921 5,877 Total Requirements 97,956 1,921 i 99,877 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Storm Drainage Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General Services $ Supplies 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets 494,000 494,000 Reserve for Contingencies 45,869 3,850 49,719 Total RequiremeutS 542,869 3,850 546,719 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. District #4 (San Pablo Area) General Services & Supplies 18,500 4,689 23,IS9 Fixed Assets 1,500 1,500 Reserve for Ccr-tingencies 3,196 727 Total Requirements 23,196 4,689 727 -6- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Nemo of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage Maintenance (Continued) County Service Area - Drainage 2 General Services G Supplies 3,000 3,0100 Other Charges 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets 57,000 57,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,413 y 4 013 Total Requirements 65,000 2,413 67,413 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Ccunty Service Area - Drainage 3 General Services & Supplies 4,000 4,000 Fixed Assets 40,000 3 ,038 36,962 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirement 45,000 4,038 40,962 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Drainage 12 General Fixed Assets 2,300 2,300 Other Charges 100 100 Reserve for Contingencies 188 9 197 Total Requirement 2,588 9 2,59 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General Salaries $ Employee Benefits 7,889 7,889 Services & Supplies 730 730 Reserve for. Contingencies 250 83 33:, Total Requirements 8,869 83 8,952 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. P-2 (Danville-Alano) General Services & Supplic-3 58,108 58,108 "esc,rve for Contingencies 4 ,000 4,000 Total Require.monts 62,10862,10- -7- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of. District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Police P-4 (Orinda) General Service G Supplies 58,108 58,108 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirements 59,108 59,108 P-5 (Round Hill Area) . Services £ Supplies 29,054 946 30,000 Other Charges 400 400 a Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Requirements 29,454 946 J0,400 To a(liust budget as requested by Sheriff County Sanitation District 13 (Tara Hills Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,394 11,:94 General Reserve 234,951 999 23 ,95' Total Requirements 246,345 999 --14S)3+b . t To adjust budget to available funds District #5 (Port Costa) General Services F Supplies 8,415 1,707 6,708 Fixed Assets 7,140 7,140 Reserve for Contingencies 11555 1 ,555 Total Requirements 17,110 3,262 13,848 To adjust budget to available funds. District 15 (Port Costa) Debt Service Other Charles 1,532 1,532 General Reserve 1,057 249 _ 808 Total Requirements 2,589 249 22340 To adjust budget to available funds. 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Vinal Name of District Fund Budget_ Increase Decrease ,hudget County Sanitation (Continued) District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 115,365 115,365 Fixed Assets 682,100 682,100 Reserve for Contingencies 19,746 19,746 General Reserve 43,133 7,124 36 LOOS Total Requirements 860,344 7,124 853,220 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. • District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) Debt Service Other Charges 27,759 27,7.59 Total Requirements 27,759 27,759 District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Reserve Fixed Assets 189,530 _ 189,530 Total Requirements 189,530 189,530 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) General Services14 Supplies 1 9,565 9,565 Fixed Assets 1,500 1 ,500 Reserve for Contingencies 1,106 1,106 General Reserve 4,621 2,014 2,607 Total Requirements 16,792 2,014 14,770 District 97B (Port Chicago Area) Debt Service ® Other Charges 16,600 - 16,600 Total Requirements 16,600 16,600 District #15 (Bethel Island Area) General Fixed Assets 3,219 3,21 Reserve for Continencies 321 147 468 Total Requirements 3,540 147 3,687 To adjust budget to available funds. Dis-;rict 4'19 (:3yron Area) General Services & Supplies 53,475 .1 ,000 52,475 Fixed Assots 20,000 1,000 21,000 P.eserve for Contingencies 7,347 7,347 General Reserve 9,311 6y7 10.1)08 Total Requirements 90,133 1,69, 1,000 9G,o30 To adjust budget to available funds. I -9- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease, Budget County Service Area - Sewerage S-1 (Sandmound) General Services & Supplies 411 411 Total Requirements 411 411 S-2 (Oakley) General Services & Supplies 7,370 1 7,371 Total Requirements 7,370 1 7,371 To adjust budget to available funds. County Service Area - Lighting L-32. (Unsington) General Services & Supplies 16,523 16,523 Reserve for Contingencies 1,652 83 1,569 Total Requirements 18,175 83 I5,092 To adjust budget to available funds. L-41 (West County) General Services & Supplies 55,328 55,328 Reserve for Contingencies S,S33 37 5Liq-_ — 41t5 Total Requirements 60,861 37 600244 To adjust budget to available funds. L-42 (North Centr?.1 County) General Services A Supplies 32,476 32,476 Reserve for Contingencies 3,248 179 3,427 Total Requirements 35,724 179 35,qu L-43 (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 32,05 32,585 Reserve for Contingencies 3,2SS 427 2,331 Total Requirements 35,843 427 0,416 To aijust budget to available funds. -10- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease -Budget County Service Area Lighting L-45 (North Central County) General Services Fj Supplies S9,325 1,350 60,675 Reserve for Contingencies 5,932 135 6,067 Total Requirements 65,257 1,485 66,742 To adjust budget to available funds. C, L-46 (North West County) General Services & Supplies 33,656 33,656 Reserve for Contingencies 3,366 2,665 701 Total Requirements 37,022 2,665 34,357 To adjust budget to available funds. County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta Ferry) General Services & Supplies 17,047 17,047 Other Charges 506 8559i Total Requirements -- 17,SS3 85 17,638 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-3 (Rollincy,400d) General Services Fj Supplies 6,751 37 6,788 Reserve for Contingencies 675 3 6718 Total Requirements 7,426 40 7,466 To odJust budget as requested by Public Works. M-4 (South San Ramon) General Services & Supplies 51,466 467 51,033 Reserve for Contingencies 5,147 46 5,193 Total Requirements 56,613 513 57,126 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works -11- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-6 (Danville Area) General Services & Supplies 11,289 195 it 484 Reserve for Contingencies 1,129 19 1 148 Total Requirements 12,418 214 12,632 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. �1-7 (North Richmond) General Services & Supplies 8,438 190 8,620 Reserve for Contingencies 844 19 '863 Total Requir?ments 9,282 209 9,492 To adjust, budget as requested by Public Works. M-8 (Byron Area) General Services & Supplies 4,805 4,80S Reserve for Contingencies 471 132 5,+9 Total Requirements 5,276 132 5,144 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-0 (Orinda) General Services & Supplies 2,094 37 2,131 Reserve for Contingencies 209 4 213 Total Requirements 2,303 41 2,344 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. K-11 (3rinda Area) General Services & Sz!ppli:s 25,834 15,83* Reserve for Contingencies 2,583 374 2,200 Total Requirements 28,417 374 228,043 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. -12- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease —Iludget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Continued) M-12 (E1 Sobrante Area) General Services & Supplies 4,574 2,540 2,034 Fixed Assets 12,152 12,152 Reserve for Contingencies 1,673 1,673 Total Requirements 18,399 4,.20.3 14,186 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-13 (Bethel island Area) General Services t Supplies 413 3 416 Reserve for Contingencies 41 41 Total Requirements 454 3 457 To adjus-c budget as requested by Public Works. 11-14 (Clayton urea) General Services & Supplies 1,807 286 2,093 Reserve for Contingencies 180 29 _ 209 Total Requirements 1,987 315 2,302 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. ;i-15 (Ygnacio Valley) General Services & Supplier 435 436 Reserve for Contingencies 43 3 40 Total Roquirement;s 479 3 476 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-16 (Clyde Area) General Services & Supplies 3,425 3;1425 Reserve for Contingencies 342 152 190 Total Requirements 3,767 152 3,615 -13- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Butt Increase decrease Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Continued) I17 ( =talvin Manor) General Services & Supplies 6,070 6,070 Fixed Assets 52,723 15,966 36,757 Reserve for Contingencies 5,879 1,597 4,282 Total Requirements 64,672 17,563 47,109 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. *111-19 (Orinda 11.00ds) General Services & Supplies 231 231 Reserve for Contingencies 23 23 Total Requirements 254 254 Al-20 (Rodeo Area) General Services 6 Supplies 2,836 2,836 5,672 Reserve for Contingencies 283 284 567 Total Requirements 3,119 3,120 6,239 HI To adjust budget as requested by Public iFiorks. County Service Area - Reads RD-1 (Noir Oaks) General Services & Supplies 1,581 1 1,582 Reserve for Contingencies 159 _ 1.38 Total Requirements 1,739 1 � 1,740 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Recreation R-4 ('oraa) General Services T; Supplies 120,900 120,900 Fixed Asset: 339,021 31-9,021 Reserve for Cont?nz;; ncies 20,000 4,347 15 ,653 Total Requirements 479,921 4,347 475,574 ,, To. adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. -14- 1973-74 1973-•74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease -Budget County Service Area - Recreation (Continued) R-5 (South Danville) General Services & Supplies 9,916 23 9,939 Reserve for Contingencies 991 991 Total Requirements 10,907 23 10,930 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. i R-6 (Orinda) General Services i Supplies 26,000 4,650 21,350 Faxed assets 195,443 4,650 200,093 Reserve for Contingencies 6,000 7,265 13,265 Total Requirements 227,443 11,915 4,650 234,708 " To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Library LIB-2 (Tl General Services P, Supplies 10,200 10,200 Fixed Assets 81,258 28,420 52,838 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirements 92,458 29,420 63,038 ^.'o adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Count), Service Area - Library LIB-10 (Pinole) General Services €, Supplies 10,600 10,600 Fixed Assets 145,231 70,i3i 75,101 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 w 2,000 Total Requirements �157,83I 72,131 85,700' To adjust budget to -maintain desired tax rate. LIB-11 (Oakley) General Services & Supplies 3,076 1 3,077 Tc;�al Requirements 3,076 1 ,O 7 To .adjv�;z budget to maintain desiired tax rate. 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Scrvice Area - Library (Continued) LIB-12 (Moraga) General servicos & supplies 0,350 9,350 Fixed Assets 119,549 21,775 97,774 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Requirements 130,899 23,775 107,124. ' To adjust budget to naintain desired tax rate. LI8-13 (Yanacio Valley) General C, Fixed Assets 176,316 4,056 172,260 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 0 Total Pequirements 178,316 6,056 172,260 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Water Agency Contra Costa County General Salaries & Employee Benefits 4,800 4,800 Services & Supplies 599,707 77,097 400,000 276,804 Reserve for Contingencies 20,450 7,710 28,160 Total Requirements 624,9.5.7. 84,807 400,000 309,764 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. OFFICE OF COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLE'R Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other Than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Recommtended Budget Estimates of Revenue other than Current Property 'Faxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 19 Revenue Estimates Revenue Ustimates DA-rict- Revenue Item Fund - Proposed_ gudget Increase Decrease Final "'Ild4get County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 449 449 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Ho,,T,Qowner1s Property Tax Relief 1,649 Business Inventory Ta;c Relief 5,944 7,593 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Hoi-,ico:ver ls Props-i-ty Tax Relief 32 32 Business Inve-1-.ory Tax Relief 4,954 4,986 Flood cont-,�l Contra Costa County General Planning, ("; Engineering 321 ,601 Hoi.iQoi,:ner's Property Tax Relief BUSilleSS Tn veat�ry Ti:.x Relief 10,517 372,937 y x. M`_ .one I (.',Iar.-!,. Crac!,) General Federal Sulk-.vention 2,000 -2 oc, ".-ate Subvcntion 3,000 : h! 10 Property T-,X Relief 3,8330,8 381;0 -Zusin..;ss Inveatory Tax Relief -504 9,542 -�- ~ 1973-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Deuuuoo Estimates Jistrict � Revenue Item Fund P a6 Budget Increase Oeuruusm ' Final Budget Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Business Inventory Tax Relief 85 _ 85 Os Zone 3D (Central County) General East Bay Regional Park Subvention 94^000 94 ,000 State QobVmntiuo 316"000 316,000 ederuI Subvention 320^000 3-20,000 ther Subvention 5,0O0 5,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Belief 136,088 I36,D88 Business Inventory Tax Relief 14,160 l� l60 Zona 7 (Wildcat Creek) General ' Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,09I 3'091 Business Inventory —lax Relief 1 ,053 1,053 4*144 . ,^.., 7000 G (Pinole Creek) General llomeoxoer/s Property Tax Relief 323 323 Business Inventory tax Relief 36 26 0 n 8A General 11om0000er/s Property Tax Relief l *0(,0 I ^O60 Business Inventory Tax Relief 60 60 . 1120 Zuoo D (Rodeo Creek) General 11o:naovnmr`s Property Tax Relief 1,7I4 1,7114 Business Inventory Tux Relief 20 __ 26 , 1,740 - , _40' . . \ � ~ -3- * I973-74 073-74 Buvoona Estimates Revenue 2.stimates DistrictPuud d Dud Increase Decrease Final 8uJ ot ' __- Zoom D& General State Subvention 1,000 I,090 Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 5,304 5,(,01 Business Inventory Tux RmIlof 90 80 6^994 ~,'~` Storm Drainage a 77 General ����Iwmsaut liilI Subvention II,000 ll,()(-)O Zone 3D Subvention 6,000 6,000 ' 17,000 - ^-..- Storm Drain Maintenance District Ul (Ygoacio VuIIoy Area) General ' County Subvention 45,000 4S `O0O Zone 3B Subvention 3^000 2 `000 Drainage Fees 10,000 10 000 Homeowner's Property 'fax Oalio£ 14,963 l4 ,06.3 Business Inventory �u� Dalim� 2,783 .- ,783 . _ _ __ — -' 4G �� *e District ft4 (Sao Pablo Areal General Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 1,479 1 ,-179 Business Inventory ?ax Bmllaf 144 1.14 1,623 1 ^6,23 County Service Area D-2 (Walnut Area) General 47 O8O 47 O�D D��ioa�o �om� _------- -------47,000 47 47 .O0S ^ 9-3 (Antioch) General Draiva�o �ec� 40,000 40,]O0 40^000 4C ,800 - D`l2 (Suodiouod Acres) General 8oaoo,.-oer's Prmpurty Tux Relief 19I l9l Btzinuss Inventory Tax Relief 25 , _ _ 21h -^» ' ^ ' ' -4- I973-74 I973-74 8mvmnom Estimates Revenue Esti-mates District 6 Rev--nue %��o �o�8' Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget _ County Service Area - Police 9-1 (Crockett) General 110mconuer's Property I`uz Relief 1^3I9 1 ,219 Duaiocsa Inventory Tax Relief 518 518 1,737 1,737 9-2 (Dzo\ville-Alamo) General nmoownor'a Property Tax Relief 6"146 6,l46 ~m��usioeaa Inventory Tax Relief 267207 6,413 6,41,3 P-4 (Orimda) General 8oimaoxuwr's Property Tax ReIi--,f 6^667 6'667 Business Inventory Tax Relief 181 lsl ' ' . _ �-S (Dnuod Hill Area) General l!o�coxoor's Property Tax Relief 3,335 65 _,3_ ���` . 3"335 65 3^27O � County sanitrtinn District XS (Port Costa) General Sonur Use Charges 9,758 9 ,758 ^ 9,-1153 Distrizt- 7& (�o!-�t Pittsburg Area) General Inturost on Iuv:utud Funds l 'OUO 1 ,O00 So'.mr Services 3,520 s^.�20 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 300 300 poduzal Subvention 466°900 4c`�^�UO . Pa��it 11 Inspection 5,241 Sale of Loud 5 ,000 From 7& Construction Fund 124,591 12 S3l 481J.961 124 ,S91 ^ ' . � ' ` -S- ` 1973-74 I973-7l Revenue Estimates Kuvouoe 3stinmtas District & Revuoue Item Fund Prop2sed aidget Increase Decrease Final Budget County Suuitatiou (Continued) District 7A [Noat Pittsburg �rm�1 C��l��I Outlay Reserve ^ ~ 2� I62 29 l�2 Bella Vista * --^--- S] 0OO Connuction � Development �m�� 53^000 , � O0U - S 000 Interest on Investments ________ ________ - ' 87,162 S7,162 D -tri-ct 7O [Port Chicago �ro�l ��uo�ol ` ' l� 17l - l2 l7l wor Oao Cbz�Q�� -- � -_ District 415 [��t��l Island Area) Q�oarmI ` _^ J83 Sewer Service Charge 882 Dis882 trict YID#l9 �D�soovery Bay) General ^ ° 3D0 S7 SOO , < Sa�vcr Services � -�'57 - '` �D0 ,—~ EoaiuocrioS� 8O0O Services --S�� 63,300 County Service Area - Lighting General ` | -32 (KousinCton) | omeu*nmr'~ Property Tax Relief 2/S44 Uusincss Inventory Tax Relief 18 �Q 2,563 L-41 C\�ost C000ty) General }!omcnxomr'n Property 7mz Relief 11,442 Bos�ucsa I l2S 125 vootozT Tax Dalim� 11"5n/ L-43 ��o�tb �uu�r4l County) General ^ ' � l�J ^ liomoownar's Pro�cxty 'fax Relief 5;140 ' lSD- Business Inventory Tax Relief lSQ 5,299 ' . ° . �_ -6- 1973-74 1073-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District ; Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget increase Decrease Final Budget Lighting (Continued) L-43 (Plwst Pittsburg Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 6,759 6,759 Business Inventory Tax Relief 285 285 7,044 7 ,0,14 L-45 (North Central County) General Iameot'ncr's Property Tax Relief 5,661 5,661 Business Inventory Tax Relief 171 171 5,832 L-46 (;north West County) General Homew-iner's Property Tax Relief 5,095 5,035 Busiucss Inventory Tax Relief 1 ,128 1 ,128 6,223 6,223 Cu,;nty Service Areas - ;Miscellaneous NI-1 (Delta Gerry) General 70 Homew..ner's Property Tax Pelief 270 - 270 ?7 :�i-s (Rollin wood) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,607 1 .607 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1 _. I 11608l ,; )S h1-4 (South San Ramon) General F,C� 7, .4 IIaY:,cotitiner. 's Property Tax Relief 7,564 „� Eusincss inventory Tax Relief 72`9 29 8,293 S,wJa (Danville Area) General t1 60 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 680 680 ' \ ' -7- 1973-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Rovm000 3ntbnutos District & Revenue Item Fund —Proposed B � Ionrmusa Decrease Final Dod t u Q-7 (North Kicb>uood) General l|omouwoor/s Property Tax Relief 497 407 Business Inventory Tax Relief 882 SK,l,379 l'370 0-8 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief lIg I19 119 UD NI-11 (Orinda) General Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,072 l O72 (El Sobraute) General � Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 53 53 Business Inventory Tax Relief 3S2 ��� --------- -------' -------- H-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 25 25 25 U-14 (Clayton) General fooccoxnor/s Property Tax Relief 196 106 ��° ' -^.. -1-16 (Clyde Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 569 569 Business Inventory Tax Relief 7 ___ 7 576 �� Z7 , . ' _� -D- , I973-74 I973-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District Vj Dmv�nna Item Poud Proposed Budget Ioczaosm Decrease Final D��d ot County Service Area - Recreation N-17 (0uotulvio Manor) General Hmnoowuor's Property Tax Relief 9'lD5 9,195 Doaincua Inventory Tax 8oIimt 97 97 9^�33 M-20 (Rodeo Area) General lgbtiog Fee 3,119 3,119 3^119 RD-1 (Muir Oak) General 8omaoxuer`s Property Tax Ballaf 105 105 105 105 D-4 D1oracrul General Park Dedication Fees 194,000 19. ,000 Hu/uumwoor's Property Tux Relief 12*491 12.491 ~° Business Inventory Tux Relief 473 473 . -_-^~~ ^ , -4 R-5 (South Danville) General Homo-owner's Property Tax Relief OSO 880 0.) 'Uriuda1 General Pork [)odioutinn Fees 34,000 1!ouuownur`s Property Tax Relief 7,852 7.862 DuSiouSs IoYorltory 7ZLx, Relief 213 213 Interest on Inves#aunta 1 ,500 l .7)00 43,576 75 ,'m/,ioty Service Area - Libraries � IU-2 (El Sjobruote) General 11orceoxomr's Property Tax Relief 4^107 IN �= ' B�ai�o�s Inventory Tax DmIimf 88 88 ' -------- --------' -------'— `,^'~ . '^.~ ' . ^ � � � � i f 1973-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Filial Budget Libraries (Continued) LIB-10 (Pinole) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14,214 14,214 Business Inventory Tax Relief 288 288 14,502 1sI,502 LIB-12 (Moraga) General Homeo%rner's Property Tax Relief 7,494 7,494 Business Inventory Tax Relief 284 284 7,778 7, 18 LIB-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 9,464 9,464 Business Inventory Tax Relief 478 478 9,942 9,942 Centra Costa Water Agency General County Subvention 400,000 400,000 - Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 20,205 20,205 Business Inventory Tax Relief 5,239 5,239 425,444 400,000 25,444 s r� l' a j h x � • 4 4. ei i F ti } MONISM - 0*ii:e of . C40UNTY AUDITOR-:.U:' r:tU:.4 ` Contra Costa County Martinez, California aiioust 31, 1973 • '.'!.•T. P -A'S H TO: Board of Supervisors H. Donald Funk, Audi tor-Control ler �� S I J B j LCT: County Tax Ra`e for 1973-74 The County 2udoe. For the fiscal ycnr In73-74, as adopted by your Board on August 30, 197.=+, i11 require the following tar. levies: Anount Required tate per $1.00 of on liccured Roll Assessed Valuatic Ge;:cral Fund-Ceneral Purpose 47,5;5,509 2.356 -Retirer.Ient & Pension 4,394,346 .243 i•oral General Fund 47,545,509 2.629 Com:r,?;r S,lt�erin.ien:iG1n of Schools Fund 523,827 ,029 jtic!1rw:-cJ Fv;Tdin- Interest and Fund 960 .001• Total Ccanry-'.vide Funds 43,070,296 2.659 r County Library Fund-Ganeral Purpose 2.530,271 .1655 -P.etirelrert Pension. 116,416 .008 Total County Librar;, Fund 2,646,747 171 Total, Exclusive of City of Richmond 50,117,013 2.830 The for going tax rates were comp'ited on the folloviing adjusted vol-.;at:ion basis: Secure Roil Unsecured :oll Count-v Assessed Poll 1,643,758,1So 122,309,784 State Buard Assessed Roll-Utility Roll 179.33S;100 -0- Total Equalized Not V'aluatzor. 1 ,823,146,546 122,3G9,7194 L..ss "I"J. awarccs for: AlloccLtion of Taxes to Various Ped-„ relovnent A(,-ncies 10,535,250 ' of 1% Ca;".�e lations and Adjustments 4,109,395 20 Es% ;a a_ed Delinquencies _ 2,4 5 796 Adjusted County-19ide Tax Base • 1.3??.Sn .7D: 119 values ion ou.tslde o7' titV Li �.cli one ,55s,71fc,ss= 67,0=S"1,536 Less for: llcczt?on n; tares to Various � :ct�” �oll:ent Ar-e tics 4,41^ 51%9 Au.ii:tr.: iit a^.d DcIino,ienc F, 5.G -,_=02 Library , l,i 7}� County Ta;- ase 1 ,i 7 1 3 or3Y0171,6,y7J.4G T,'-,e :.Zi. ty of )-our Board to levy -,axes t{: f_`.Tance tt?f' �C:I:it✓ : 't''' is set forth In Section 29120 r- the Ge°.a n;-c;,t Ccde. II r% IT:gb Office of C( NTY AUDITOR.-CON TROiLE4 Contra Costa County Martinez, California Aut.ust 31 , 1973 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: 11. Ronald Funk, Auditor-Controller j SUBJECT: County Tax Rate for 1973-74 The County Bu3get for the fiscal year 1973-74, as adopted by your Board on August 30, 1973, will require the following ta:c levies: Amount Required Rate per ;100 of on Secured Roll Assessed Valuatioo General. Fund-General Purpose 47,545,509 2.386 -Retirement. & Pension 4,394,346 ,243 Total General Fund 47,545,509 2.629 County Superi-ntendent of Schools Fund 523,827 .029 Ri chmoild Puildi ng Tnterest and Redemption Furl 960 .001 Total County-Wide Funds 48,070,296 2.659 County Library Fund-General Purpose 2,5.30,271 .163 -Retirement F, Pension 116,446 .008 Total County Library Fund 2,646,747 .171 Total , Exclusive of City of Richmond 50,717,013 2.830 The fore`oi.r.R tax rates were computed on the following adjusted valuation. basis: Secured Roll Unsecured Roll County Assessed Roll 1,643,758,155 122,309,784 State Board Asscssea Roll-Utility Roll 179,388,190 -0- Total Equalized Net Valuation 1,823,146,346 122,309,784 Less Allowances for: Allocation of Tates to Various Redevelopment Agencies 10,535,250 -4 of la Cancellations and Adjustments 4,109,395 2% Estimated I1el.inquencie's _ 2,446,196 Adjusted County-hide Tax Base 1,SOf3,501,711I 119,863,5II8 Valuation outside of Citi- of Richmond 1,555,710,554 87,048,586 Less Allowances for: Alloc�_tion of taxes to Various Re-JeVe101) '�'!'.t Agencies 4,402,969 Adjust;�.e;its and Delinquencies 3.451 ,402 1,740,972 Adjusted County Library Tax lin se 1,S'7.826.IS3 85,707,614 Th'- duty of your 11oar(. to le:Vy T17•an/Sr ty taxes to finance the County Budget is set forth in S:ction 291.20 cl the Go;rcr-:mant rode. MDF/CI,T:gb In the Board of Supervisors of -Contra Costa County, State of California Thursday , August In , 19 Z-3.- In the Matter of Retention of Certain Matters in the Administration and Finance Committee. This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974, the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) having submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday, August 28, 1973; and i Mr. Sebe Hill, President , Carquinez Coalition, 'having appeared and urged that federal revenue sharing funds be allocated to implement a low cost public transportation system for the communities of Crockett , Rodeo and Port Costa; and Mrs. Mattie Harrison and Mrs . Evelyn Paoli having also appeared in support thereof; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having recommended that :aforesaid matter be retained in the Administration and Finance Committee for further consideration; and Supervisor Linscheid having recommended that the matter of establishment of a central laboratory for sobriety testing services vl� (discussed by the Board on Tuesday, August 28, 1973) also be . retained in said committee for further review; and On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor Boggess, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recommendations are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny , W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None. ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Congressman Jerome Waldie Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Mr. Hill Supervisors Sheriff-Coroner affixed this 0th day of August , 197 Auditor-Controller W. Tr PAASCH, Clerk Board Committee Administrator BY. Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid �'/�' t ��.�....J i � i' �i �.f :J .t YiF�Lit I •,l H245/73-15M ?L f` �.�.�'•.� � .i' .� )� C, Jl - C`i .- In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Thursday , August 30 19 7 In the Matter of Adoptin': County Budget for Fiscal Year 1973-19714 . This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal ,year 1973-19714 , the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A . Linscheid) having; submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday , August 28, 1973 ; and The Board having; heard from all interested persons wishing to speak with respect to the proposed budget and the recommendations of the Administration and Finance Committee ; and Mr. t-lilliam Baker, Executive Vice President , Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, having appeared and recommended that the budget as submitted by aforesaid committee be adopted; NO111, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Boggess , seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the public hearing is CLOSED and the County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 is ADOPTED as follows : (type in budget) The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny , W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None. ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty . 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Mr. Baker Supervisors Auditor-Controller affixed this 30th day of August , 197-- Administrator 97_Administrator W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By '-�� , Deputy Clerk Lourette Kincaid H 24 5/73-15M E 410 y Ma Sltttir on to 'lurn, aril call j4he d_6 n t r a Gosta woes count.7t is� tal far the com!ty _budget:`hearings as ",estisIunen#of$�spay cllri Aug..38,>the board of super ie,3�a it�nowt visors voted to hitt. the Remember, the spay clot- �$t1,tI0ll=anequesteci for tt es- x A for,-- pat, ,the pe Ie'S #ablishment of a spay cUmc " ;everyoiie who reads Ibis Iet Into- a;contingency fuait for ter woultk sensi a danatioi�°;to Wrouim4tely 30: days> SPAY Clinic I'ttdd, Arnett= snore` , Iess,.�-after �Ittch can Savlitgs, P 'Q,Box`5262 Time ttiedtropoaal sell-again { Walnut :`Creek, 94x96,; we to brotlrt up. for.Almould Iie svAon #I1e way ta= :stun tivard ilie estahlisbment=•01 7f you, the citizens of Con- this sacely neeied facility; tra Gasta~aunty.are ewer to We need nehv 'rtenabers-tc guy relief from the ":,us: n our;ef#ajcts ry Joiri cost df spaYmg rand our group fiYr rieu'tetsng gaur pets, ;you your`agiglicatgu nosy ;Yanr -must do"`something. atout tt dues pay for our adiniitstra• b e for a .thi's"""'proposal is .,rive casts Pllione 886 foz brought.before'the.board of, 'information 4 supervisors again far constd.;: P ho n.e your supervisor eratiaa► todayThea nirnxbers axe a. H ave 4 you hard si�rikusg °,�olIows Hien..and heads of :house- holds a amk6d the-steadily 6am:=PablWMarWte :area: In6vii rig cost of aninral=: Alfred ,M" Dias, L616.;'23rd control as compared to the Cor San } Pint- 2a . CAincord+PIeasanf Hail ` ;War reduced-cost of.;slits facillty ',red: I , gess,,,, 27, 'Can `�y use of 1.a spay cluuc?r:Can �`curd Av mrd 687-69OD. you tett your.ciil�en yr el- Richmond, El;°Cerrito:azea. deny parents they-cannot.• dames P. Kenny,. 10(!'37tt have ,a--.pet because you SA , .':Rachmond, 233.7060 can3 afford to Have: it Danville;: Prtfsburg Ed spayed or• neutered? Myst ;inunt3 A:4 I,insciieul,;45'.Civic they be,-deprive 761.the coon rDr. Pittsbur 439 .`"La pamansh ' and therapeutic gr }'vs3ue-,of a 9teeause of `fayctte,�Walnut ;I�eeic, t3rin ua 3amii E Moriarty,;344< :.-fear, prat;it svilI,repuroduce G o l d'e;n Gafe Atay, Z;a Must Elie Soy of ciririg #ie faette,,2849x33. educed fa dolia s;;and >i'Iie.sn ey. sa�ved,b 1pivr cents? Ate we,''or,are sve riot, a civilize&s6cietp�"'`` eririg.the t antmatton IIsn't A= I# tune..you -;men .stol has,been.proved tiy:fig .,-Out svliese .pour:.tas .oresthe, I.os ;A;pgeIe± money,is going?'.Wouldn't it ,'E spay clinic ft lbas'provert,si ia#re"more sense to;spend successful W : :that city;'is xt►,0oo 'anlp ;once ;than to estal7lishingr adaitianal .clip spend '$50UO11 additionally ics'ta.meet the.Ienawnd The year, after year,-,aver`; and er:of animals destroy. -above;the .allocated cost of .ed in Contra.t3osta4+ao+inity>i: anitrial: .codkral? You:. die.second .,largest ,:ut<4Nhaying for, this added. ex- '''state.'Are we to remain in be- per and it Is your own � regretiahle`positfun be• fault if. you cantiaue to'do cause of lack of foresight on so! the part af.some of;our su- ,Wrtte;.qr phone your; su ls ' money 'sve :Pery sor and_ request' that _..5vould.save on amnial: can this money,be,allocatea for trol by use of a self-seipport- the:es abllshtrlint of a low ing p clinic caitlsl rhes:"lac :,c:.cst"."seI#-suppttr#Ittg :spay used for.;other`issues,+�rtcb s clinic 'If;:*OU--ace relc actant :" o n e e r n (bAfr C,oaita to ;#aa talar h'im 1n die is .not. .available, -leave *fhmk'afrout it melt Itfls your,. name .and; nature td ;m e n s Y lli �k�"pacicet�: yaaf call; tai lits secretary Phtra+a your sup6rv� nr+` gh keeps t a ta3ly cEllS �,IAFI "�S�tirr3er ;and" passes 'tl}e u>¢omiattod - �'4�� �Concord i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Denying Allocation ) of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds ) for Construction of Animal Spay ) Thursday , August 30 , 1973 Clinic. ) This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 , the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) having submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday , August 28, 1973 ; and Mrs . Barbara Poppins , representing SPAY of Contra Costa County, having appeared and urged that $50,000 of revenue sharing monies be allocated for construction of a county Animal Spay Clinic ; and Mrs . Miriam Wilkins , representing the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Contra Costa County , and Mrs . Nancy Cole, President of SPAY, having appeared in support of said request ; and Mrs . Marjorie Gills (wife of a veterinarian) having appeared in opposition to the proposal; and Supervisor Linscheid having indicated that the committee members had been unable to agree on the proposal that $50 ,000 in federal revenue sharing funds be allocated for construction of an Animal Spay Clinic, and having recommended that said allocation be denied at this time and the question be put on the ballot for determination by the voters of this county; and Supervisor Boggess having stated that there is a need for a County Animal Spay Clinic , that the proposed allocation for this facility represents only . 003% of the total amount of federal revenue sharing funds available to the county , and that it is his recommendation that the allocation be approved; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that in his opinion the Board of Supervisors should consider, as an alternative, placing this proposal on the ballot and having recommended that the proposed allocation be removed from the budget at this time and the money placed in the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund-Reserve for Contingencies ; and On motion of Supervisor J . P. Kenny, seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Dias is APPROVED. The foregoing; order was Massed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J . I'. Kenny , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : Supervisor 1.7. N. Boggess . ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty . CEI-tTIF ED COPY I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of cc : Ms . Poppins the original document w,iich is on file in my office, Agricultural Commissioner and that it was 1>a.>::i i_ ..c:o?tea by the Board of Auditor-Controller Supercl:on; of Cunha C Count•, California, on the tate �::..:n. y T:"-.. _. i T. i'..AsCIi, county County Registrar ctY:r & er.-{:_f:_ , ci__.. _ai:i Loard of supen-isors, County Ad inistrato.- a ; cierr_ o_ Y IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Denying Allocation ) of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds ) for Acquisition of Additional Park ) Thursday, August 30 , 1973 Lands Adjacent to Mt . Diablo State ) Pork. ) This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget for fiscal year 1973-1974 , the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) having submitted its written recommendations on the proposed budget on Tuesday , August 28, 1973; and Ms . Mary Bowerman of Lafayette having appeared and urged that monies be allocated from revenue sharing funds to assist in the acquisition of additional park lands adjacent to Mt . Diablo State Park; and Supervisor Linscheid having indicated that the committee members had been unable to agree on the proposal that $400,000 in federal revenue sharing funds be allocated for purchase of additional lands in the vicinity of Mt . Diablo State Park, stating that although the acquisition of additional land for parks and open space is desirable, it would be appropriate that such a proposal be placed on the ballot for determination by the electorate, and having recommended that said allocation be denied at this time; and Supervisor Boggess having; advised the Board that the allocation of federal revenue sharing monies for this purpose would be of benefit to allpeople in the county as well as meet a county need, pointing out that only 2-1/2% of the total federal revenue sharing monies available to the county is proposed for this purpose and that a unique opportunity is afforded at this time in that an allocation of these funds can be used as local matching funds to obtain additional state monies for acquisition of lands to preserve this natural landmark; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having indicated that he concurs with the need to provide parks but pointed out that the acquisition would be for expansion of the State Park System and that the East Bay Regional Park District is primarily responsible for major park and recreation facilities for residents of the county ; and Supervisor Dias having stated that he concurred with Supervisor Linscheid that the allocation of funds for acquisition of park lands should be placed on the ballot for determination by the people; Supervisor Linscheid having moved that the proposed allocation of $400, 000 of federal revenue sharing funds be 1) removed from the budget at this time, 2) that these funds be placed in the Federal Revenue Sharing Fund-Reserve for CdntinEencies , and that 3) the ratter of the above-mentioned ballot proposition be referred to the East Bay Regional Park District and the Contra Costa County Recreation and :•iatural Resources Commission for evaluation and recommendation and that the District be requested to work with Senator John A. Plejedly in a joint effort to obtain financial assistance from the State; i On motion of Supervisor Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of Supervisor Linscheid is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : Supervisor W. N. Boggess . ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of the original document wolcli is on file in my office, and that it was passed & a&))ted by the Loard of Supervisors of Contra CustL, County, California, on the date shown. a'CrESi': W. T. PAASCH, county clerk &ex-officio clerk of said L'oard of Supervisors, by depu'ty�}c�lerk..! on cc : Ms. Bowerman East Bay Regional Park District Contra Costa County Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Auditor-Controller County Registrar Administrator 1 i 0 RECF D /If OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CL - 80. ^. s C H G=SUF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY oy o ,RA cow E vIsoRs Administration Building Martinez, California Deputy To: Board of Supervisors Date: August 30, 1973 From: J. P. McBrien, Subject: Budget Revisions County Administ atox The attached schedule of budget revisions incorporates a number of changes, primarily technical in nature, to reflect revisions in fund balances available, establishing a separate tax levy for the Superintendent of Schools pursuant to Chapter 208, Statutes of 1973, adjustment required for the County Airport Enterprise Fund and revisions made for cost allocations to various departments. The net effect of these adjustments is to increase the total county budget to $186,448,153; however, the proposed tax rates as indicated in the Administration and Finance Committee report ($2.830 outside Richmond and $2.659 inside Richmond) will not change. FF/aa encls. i BUDGET REVISIONS 1973-1974 Appropriations Increase Decrease 1. Superintendent of Schools Occupancy Cost $73,1Oq(1) Data Processing Services $4 000(�-� Cost Applied (500)(1) Pleasant Hill Buildings Rent of Real Property 29,555 Cost Applied 43,0545M 2. County Airport Construct Commercial Court 33,000(2) Airport Subsidy Aid to Enterprise Fund 599589(4) 3. Various Budget Units a. Labor Provided (79935)(4) b. Telephone Exchange Service - GF 27,065(4) Telephone Exchange Service - LF 349(3) c. Maintenance of Radio and Electronic Equipment l v 250�4'� d. Data Processing Services 122,300 4 e. Microfilm Service 7,134(4) 4. Assessor Open Shelf Filing System 7,000(4) 5. Reserve for Contingencies -- Library Fend 3,048(3) Reserve for Contingencies - General Fund 157,311(4) Total $296t548 $2639263 Net Inu%rease Fund Breakdown Superintendent of School Fund(l) $3,500 un Airport Enterprise Fd • ) 33 000 County Library Fund 2,699 General Fund72484 T7T' Net Increase 33.285 2. Revenues Increase Decrease Superintendent of Schools Salary - General Fund $21,000 Superintendent of Schools Salary - Superintendent of Schools Fund $23,660 1 EXPLANATION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 208, Statutes of 19:3, a separate tax levy must be established to finance the operation (ivrluding the cost of housing in a county office) of the County Superintendent of Schools. This revision to the budget provides for the space occupancy cost (as determined by the Cotmty Auditor--Controller) and reduces the estimated charges for Data Processing Services. 2. A revised proposal has resulted in a change of plans at the County Airport thereby permitting deletion of an appropriation for construction of Commercial Court. Also, a reduction in the Airport Enterprise Fund balance available ($53,950) and revenues ($34,000), together with a net bud*et decrease ($28=361), requires that the General Fund aid to the Airport Enterprise Fund be increased $59,589 to a total of $79,589. 3. Appropriation in various budget units for labor and services provided by other county departments are affected by reductions which have been made to the budgets of the department providing the service; consequently, these reductions are passed along in the cost allocations made to those budget units receiving the service. 4. The County Assessor is converting to an open shelt filing system in the new buildi to more efficiently utilize space. An appropriation of $ ,000 is required for these files. 5. The net effect of changes in the fund balances available and proposed appropriations and revenues has been adjusted by revisions to reserves. ® PISS RELEASE CONTRA COSTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 27 / 820 MAIN STREET / MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553 / PHONE 228-5610 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 27 /-"1-"4 L - - k—A § @ t-� 4m ,", l 7 TAXPAYERS PRAISE SUPERVISORS' BUDGET COMMITTEE CLe�x c­7>'J)7 N7 COST C "y _..... - ... eputy MARTINEZ. The Contra Costa Taxpayers Association praised the work of the Administration and Finance Committee, Supervisor Warren Boggess, chairman, and Super- visor Ed Linscheid. The Committee's recommendations on the 1973-74 proposed budget came after a detailed analysis of the effect of the transfer of several major welfare programs to the Federal government, the allocation of Federal revenue sharing funds, and the overwhelm- ing requests for new programs and county employees by the various department heads. "This was a difficult year to assess budget priorities because of the uncertainties inherent in the Federal takeover of old age, blind and disabled welfare programs as well as the reduction in OEO funding," stated William P. Baker, Executive Vice President. "Another complicating factor was that public and private agencies had requested three times the amount of available Federal revenue sharing money. While the budget shows a substantial increase of $20 million, the bulk of this increase is due to the allocation of accumulated capital outlay funds and Federal revenue sharing money. "There has been considerable comment regarding the deemphasis of 'people programs. ' The only rationale for government is to serve the people in areas in which they are unable to find private assistance. In setting governmental priorities, the funding of all programs which benefit our county residents must be based solely on the merits of the program. There is no simple answer to the question of whether social welfare programs are more important than library services, whether parks are more important than police services, or whether probation is more important than fire protection. (more) "In other words, all programs are 'people programs' and must be evaluated for their effectiveness, and difficult decisions must then be made to allocate the limited public tax resources. "We commend the County Administrator's office for paring the initial request from $225 million to $192 million. The Taxpayers Association commends Supervisors Boggess and Linscheid for their determination in maintaining the $2.83 tax rate (a .3 cent reduction). We strongly recommend that the Board of Supervisors adopt the budget level of $186,378,369 recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee and set the tax rate at $2.83,11 Baker concluded. 13 J THE CONTRA COSTA SOCIETY for the PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS 1622 Santa Clara Street Richmond, California Phone: 525-0566 RECE August 30, 1973 �. /l`7 � ' T• Fr: ASC �f CLLR OAR Board of Supervisors N COOSUPERV!SC {� Martinez, California Dy _ STA •-•---......-.. eputy Gentlemen, The Contra Costa County Humane Society strongly recommends that $50,000 from revenue sharing; funds be allocated for a spay clinic. It is time to take a positive step and prevent surplus pet population instead of dealing in the cruel and expensive process of impounding ar_d '' uthanizing"animals at the rate of over 43,000 per year. - :lith the present budget allocation of $660,000 rising to $728,000 for the next year, the need for a control measurs is obvious. Indeed, it is recommended that 875,000 be put aside for the coming year. Bay Area counties consider themselves enlightened, yet So. California is ahead of us in providing spay clinics. - This week, I called four veterinarians; the price of spaying a very large dog, a specific dog presently needing the oper- ation, ranged from $40 in Walnut Creek to $90 in one veter- inary hospital. Citizens need monetary help when the price is that high. The $50,000 needed seems to be a very small amount when compared to the $875,000 ti•.hich may be needed to onefjate animal control facilities for the next year. It is a small amount compared to what indiviJual pet owners pay out in any year for operations. ;;e hope that the Board of Su oervi.sors will me-�.; to alleviate the problems and sufferi.n6 resulting from the uncontrolled pet population explosion. Very truly, i^.. '.1i1k .na 921,5 Galvin ?ir. El Cerrito, Ca. 526-5960 I B4A OF ATONr ucTWqi»'u ST • •1 ii oll(please cte 4i p r7� t Rt - nenF:UPF,,q sons QY COS=A Cr z. rAUty !J S T A T U S R F P 0 R T- { F� CS?AY f:NTP NW ER CLINIC ?ROCRANi F- r_ NOVEMFR. 1972 i. i' PREPARED BY TdE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DFPAR ,rNT OF ANIMAL REGnATION r. i w , Robert Z. Rush General Manager • r • - f 9 i e I .. f ' S i MORT E The Department of Animal Regulation has established by actual experience that a spay and Neuter Clinic program is an effec- tive and modern concept of animal population contrbi necessary to protect the health and welfare of the community. It has established that this Program is not only feasible, but a necessary function of a total an im.al care and control program designed to cope with c serious environmental problem. It is the only positive alterna-tive until non-surgical means of ani- rrzl sterilization, utilized under proper controls, is made available to the general pub ic. i ':hese conclusions, supported by the Los Angeles City Council and Mayor, has resulted in the expansion of the City's pilot F program which established one such clinic and authorized its operation for the period of February 17, 1971 through June 30, 1972. Authorization, effective July 1, 1972, was granted not I ' only to enlarge the s;.Efl at the present clinic, but to esta- blish sta-b ish additional clinics, with the enlarged staff, at two dis- trice animal shelters serving widely separated areas of the City. f 1 ' f ' i r t. SPAY AND NFUTF.R CLINIC PROGRAM The basic concept of the proprnm has always; been to provide these sur- gical' services to cat and dog owners at the lowest cost possible and E t yet maintain the highest possible medical standards. The program is designed to operate on a break-even basis, however, public fonds are appropriated on an annual basis to meet expenses. These funds are replaced by the revenues derived during the year. Because public funds { and public facilities are used there is no eligibility requirements imposed, other than City residency, upon the pet owner. Thus, aside from residency, the only- eligibility requirements imposed } upon participants are imposed upon the animals themselves. They are: i the animal must be at least six months old; no females will be spayed while pregnant, lactating; or in heat; all dogs must be licensed; and must be medically fit to undergo surgery. Procedurely, the program participant must telephone for an appointment for a pre-surgical examination which is scheduled at least In days prior to the date of surgery. At the time of examination, the fee of S17.50 for an ovariohysterectomy or 511..50 for a castration is paid and, if the animal qualities for surgery, it is vaccinated (cats for pneumonitis w and panleukopenia; dors for distemper-hepatitis-leptosprosis) . The fees noted are the total costs to the owner and include: surgery; vaccina- tions; overnight care: and emergency service at any hour should compli- cations arise. However, an additional cost of 0.5n per day .i.s .imposed upon those owners that do not pick up their animal after surgery when i they are schedulers to do so. The pet owner then returns the animal to the clinic on the afternoon prior to the scheduled date of surgery and, , normally, picks it up on the afternoon following surgery. Thus, the animal is tinder our care for a period of two nights. Comparative considerations relative to the costs of, and the services pro- vided, by the City of Los Angeles and those of a private veterinarian are indicated hereinafter (Appendix III) . However, it must be noted that the private practitioners economic achievement is strongly influenced by two elements: public evaluation of the worth of his services; and his own personal evaluation and belief of that same worth. Consequently, fees among these practitioners may vary and seem to be based upon: tradition; f average charges for a given area; estimates of hourly rates; and other geneal considerations. ! i a. E%AMINATION (Pre-surgical) : A thorough examination is pro- videcl for each surgical candidate by both surgical teams. f i. City - Costs included in the fee hereinabove noted. s_ No charge if patient is rejected because of any discovered ailment that might adversely affect the outcome of surgery. } 2. Practitioner - A charge is imoived for female cats or dogs regardless of whether the ani- mal is accepted or rejected, because of the time spent. tA . - 2 - h. IMUNUATION: Immunizations noted hereinabove are required t by both surgical teams. 1. Citv - Costs included in the fee hereinabove noted. 2. Practitioner - Fees separate and apart from regular surgical fees. c. ADMISSION: 1. City - Residence requirement for pat owner. 2. Practitioner - Varies. As a rule costs are not a factor. d. SIMGERY: Surgery provided in the clinic is equal to, or above, most private practitioners. However, experience in the clinic based upon age level of the animals, general condition and size, indicates that surgical fees for t practitioners are considerably higher. e. HOSPITALIZATION (Post Surgical) : 1. City - Care is on a continuous basis relative to i personnel in attendance and on call 24-hours a day. 2. Practitioner - Varies. Limited care in many pri- vate veterinary facilities. f. EMERGENCY SERVICES: 1 I. City - Available on a 24-hour, seven days a week r basis if required. 2. Practitioner - Limited services in many private s veterinary facilities. g. POST-OPERATIVE. CARE,: Services relative to removal of sutures and examination after surgery. 1. City - No charge. In case of post-operative complications, additional surgery or repair is accomplished without addi- tional fees. 2. Practitioner - Variable costs are involved depending upon the situation and the veterinarian. Evaluation of the factors noted indicate substantial monetary savings realized by pet owners participating in the Spay and Neuter Clinic Program. These are summarized as follows: SUM14ARY OF DIRECT 110\F.TARY 5AVINCS TO CLINIC PARTICIPA*ITS Savinfis Minimum Maximum Spay (Ovariohysterectomy) Canine 527.50 S140.0Q Spay (Ovariohystcrectomy) Feline ?7.50 85.50 Castration (Orichectomy) Canine 28.50 86.00 i s • t Castration (Orichectomy) Fcline 21.5n 71.50 From the standpoint of public acceptance, the Spay and Neuter Clinic Pro- E gram has obviously enjoyed a tremendous success. Requests to participate t have far exceeded the capabilities of the original staff and facilities. Appointments schedules have been consistently limited to two months in t advance only through administrative efforts. This condition is expected to continue despite the authorized expansion of facilities and personnel. r t Cost, revenue, and operational statistics relative to the original and t expanded clinic programs are reflected in Appendices I h II. However, { comments relative to the actual and anticipated clinic operations are as follows: 1. Original Program The ordinince stahl'_..._r._ the nilot- epay and Neuter Clinic and � authorizing the employemnt of one Veterinarian, one Kennelman (t and one Clerk Typist became effective in the fall of 1970. The : clinic did not hezin operations until February 17, 1971. It . must also be ;ioted that for approximately 41-1 months, or until about June 30, 1971, it operated at less than one-half capacity due to problems related to the recruitment of the veterinarian and development of procedures. Consequently, the reported defi- cit of revenues compared to expenditures amounting to $12,195 . during the entire pilot program period is not a true representa- tion of cynic operations. Revenues, based entirely upon the number of surgeries performed, reflect this reduction in time k available for surgical performance. A more accuraEe indicator , are those statistics for the fiscal year 1971-72 when the clinic operated at full capacity. These are as follows: Revenue (2,626 surgeries) S42,Q49 Expenditures: Salaries $33,187 ` Expense: Medical Supplies 57,185 Alterations & Improvements (20 year write-off) 577 7,762 E Equipment (10 & 20 yr. write-off) 443 ` Sub Toral fi41 General City Overhead 3,319 Less: Total Spay & Neuter Clinic frosts 44 .711 TOTAL DEFICIT - CLINIC PROGRAM 1971-72 M.762) RECET D ; 2. Expanded Program �i /1 7 _ The Department of Animal Regulation was authorized by the Lo v . P ,', A S C H Angeles City Council. and Mayor to expand the Spay and NeuterPcLZRK POPRDOF'SL)PERVISORS Clinic Program in Fiscal Year 1972-73. Expansion to cons istt.. Co/rt�-„ cosT,a CO. Deputy of: establishing two additional clinics, one at the Elevent" Avenue Animal Shelter and one at the Fast Valley Animal Shel- ter; and increasing the size of clinics by staffing all of ' them with two Veterinarians, two Veterinary Assistants, and one Clerk Typist, The Department is currently finalizing contrac- tual requirements to secure Dortable or temporary building structures, which upon completion will be presented to the Mayor and City Council for such action as may be required. t It is the Department's belief that the additional staff at each clinic will more than double the current operational capacity at the existing clinic. This is possible because of the team _ concept and a refinement of procedures made possible by our prior experience. Consequently, the number of surgeries per year will increase from an approximate 2,360 per clinic to 5,750 per clinic E and a total of 17,250. Projected revenue and expenditures are as follows: 1972-73 1973-74 Revenue S165,851 5287,697 Expenditures: Salaries Slc?5,5°5 S184,800 Expense 46,031 57,364 Amortization Plan-Equip. 4 ,031. 4,031 General City Overhead 10,458 16.5,105 18,480 264,675 f TOTAL REVE11111E IN EXCESS OF PROGRAM COSTSS746 $23,022 f \ F Revenue is basted upon the number of surgical operations that can T be performed by clinic Staff during a given period. Actual experience has provided a basis upon which to build projections of anricipated capabilities. These are as follows: ACTUAI. AND PROJECTED SURGERIRS* BY SPAY AND NFiJTER CLINIC STAFF Operations Performed Average Total Fiscal. Year - Staff Assigned Per Day Per Year WO-71 1 - Veterinarian (40± ?Months) 5.42 481* 1471-72 I - Veterinarian (12 'Months) 10.4n ),r%?r) In72-73 I - Veterinarian (6 Months) 1.?..33• 1 ,313 6 - Veterinarians (6 Months) 11 .78 8,625 Sub-Total 11.=95 0,9I� 1971-74 6 - Veterinarians (l.? 'ionths) 12.. 58 17,250 *1970-71 fiscal Year represented period of time devoted to the creation of a surgical team and establishment of clinic pro- cedures necessary to achieve an efficient operation. As Previously stated, the surgical services provided to the cat and dog owners of the City of Los Angeles arg of the highest possible medical. standards. To achieve and to maintain these standards, a staff of surecons possessing unimpeachable creden- tials and experience must he sought out and retained. Due to the effective recruitment efforts of the Personnel Department of the City of Los Angeles a dumber of well qualified veterinar- ians has been made available for appointment as surgeons in the Spay and Neuter Clinics for the Department of Animal Regulation. Job applicants have indicated that salary was not the primary i reason for this response, but was predicated upon the opportuni- ty for a qualified person to participate in a meaningful public service program of the magnitude and type authorized. Requirements for the position of Veterinarian in the Department of Animal Regulation are as follows: THE SALARY range is $1418 to 51533 per month. THE DUTIES A Veterinarian diagnoses and gives first-aid treatment to animals in custody of the Department of Animal. Reglil.atlon and inspects their care and treatment. Veterinarians also perform surgery in City spay and neuter clinics. THE VACANCIES The immediate vacancies to be filled involve full-time sur fiery in the City's spay and neuter clinics. A veterinarian so assigned receives a 5' % salary bonus, equivalent to a salary range of $1499 to 51692 per month. THE REOUIREPfFNTS a. Graduation from a school of veterinary medicine recognized by the Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine of the State of CAlifornia, and two years of full-time paid pro- fessional experience in the practice of veterinary medicine. b. One year of graduate study in veterinary medicine or a closely related field may he substituted for one year of the required experience. c. A valid license to practice veterinary medicine issue6 by the California Board of Examiners in Veterinary Medicine is desirable at the time of appointment. Candidates not possessing this lleenne may file for the examination, but must obtain the California license within 12 rionths from the date of appointment. (Reference California Business and professional Code). s d. New City employees will he required to be City residents within 18 months after appointment. 3. Ohjectlonn of the :pay and Neuter Clinic by the Veterinnry Medical c Profession. t i The California Veterinary Medical Association and the Southern Cali- fornia Veterinary Medical Association has continually expressed i opposition to the Spay and Neuter Clinic Program based upon their ' belief that the City of Los Angeles has invaded the veterinary meds- t cal field and that such surgl.cal alteration should remain a private enterprise effort. However, the most recent effort to harrass governmental agencies operating or considering to operate Spay and Neuter Clinic Programs transpired on November 9, 1472, when Senate Bill No. 481 was amended at the request of Senator Walter Stiern to amend Section 4828 of the California Business and Professional Code.. This amendment, if F passed, would prohibit the use of out-of-state veterinarians by gov- ernmental. entities unless they were under the direct supervision. of . € a veterinarian licensed in California. Current State laws covering the veterinary practice act specifically authorizes the employment of out-of-state veterinarians by govern- mental agencies for a period of 12 months from date of employment. If at the end of 12 months the veterinarians have not secured a 11cense to practice in the State of California, said services would be terminated. It is interesting to note that the provision authorizing governmental agencies to engage the services of out-of-state veterinarians has been a lay..= for approximately 20 years. 4. Application of the Spay and Neuter Program to Other Comrminities. The Spay and Neuter Clinic Program, as presented and projected by : the Department of Animal Regulation in this report, can be applied in a lesser or greater degree and in a wide variety of sound appli- cations by most cornnunities with sufficient animal population required to sustain the program. However, most communities will fail to achieve the full value of a program of this type unless it is augmented by an effective animal care and control program. Most important of these supporting programs are as follows: a. Differential in dog license fees which provides an incentive to the dog owner to have his dog spayed or neutered. b. Humane animal education program to increase animal owner responsibility in the grades Kindergarten through ;ix. . c. Law enforcement programs to achieve full compliance with 'all laws and ordirrar+ces. w t d. Ar: aggressive public relations program with accent on the need for spaying and neutering. r . i i APPENDIX I vtY Spay and Neuter Clinic Program Work Statistics For Fiscal Years 1970-71 and 1971-72 ANIMALS PROCESSED 197n-71 � 1971-77. Medical Examinations Dogs Cuts Total Dogs Cats Total Male 80 71 - 151 236 163 399 Female 487 165 652 1,479 459 .1,937 TOTAL 567 236 R03 1,714 622 7,336 Injections Male 59 130 189 173 236 409 Female 41n 322 752 1,149 663 1,812 TOTAL 489 452 941 1,322 R99 7,221 Surgery Male 2.7 74 101 245 2.55 5�0y1 Female 231 1.49 380 1,527 598 2,125 i TOTAL 258 223 481 1,773 953 2,626 } t REVENUE (Based on Number of Surgeries) # Receipts Male S 310.50 S 851.00 S1,161.50 S 2,629.00 S 7.,932.5n S 5,761.50 Female 42042.50 2,607.50 -61650.00 26,722.50 10,465.n0 37,1,97.50 TOTAL REVENUE 54,353.00 53,459.50 $7,911.50 529,551.50 513,397.50 S42,949.nn s CLINIC MANIHOURS Gross Net Gross Net 1 - Veterinarian 71,9 710 2,096 ?,02n I - Kennelman 864 856 2,108 1,888 I - Clerk Typist 1,384 1,348 2,n96 1,916 TOTAL 2,966 2.,914 6,300 5,924 � a 170-7I 1171-72 BUDGET APPROPRIATION Total Total Salaries 519.881 533,127 Expense: Animal Regulation S 3,901 56,947 Public Ruildinps (A & I's) 18,443 Sub-Total - 22,344 6,947 Equipment 142893 TOTAL 57 118 M.21274 V. AMORTIZATION PLAN-ACTUAL/ANNUAL COST Salaries 12,193 33,187 Expense: Medical. Supplies 540220 57,185 Alt. & imp. (20 yr.) 346 577 Sub-Total 4,566 7,762 Equipment: 10-20- year life 266 443 a TOTAL AMORTIZED ACTUAL COST S17,025 541,392 General City Overhead - Annual Cost: q E Computed at 10 percent salaries 1,219 3,319 TOTAL SPA`' AND NEUTER CLINIC PROGRAM COSTS 519,244 544,711 'I. C0MPARI5n':-RrVrNUE AND EXPENDITURES Revenui� S 7,811.50 S42,949.00 i Expenditures (Adjusted) 18,244.0(? ",711.00 Estimate Net Revenue Over Clinic Costa (S10t,32.S0) (S1,762,00} 5 'r cc c c o c c o c c c c c c c c c c ++ X tI1 CC C C t4 •.t X oC to C t a r1 v .7 c a r4 cli cr ts: :> Q1 a N a V. a a a N r4 '.7 a s ICA a N a s !!) N > > > > > V> W a > > > .'> > H L {.+ to c c to c to to a to c c M 41 w to co c to c co to a c c toccc c .+ ca L c o to to va c c V V41c c [�•l > u 9 -4 GIu1O UC U U tt. UC t„ > U U CIC Uu' U u EC� U 1 G Y1 r q O Pl C G rt G . U (r v t r t r-t G G •ra -4 t~ P. H (t) H V. M H .] H V Vf LLr H H Vt H <.- H i-•J t t tr V. E E O O L 41 V V G a L r1 U t Er G N a s a s a a a a a u G to a s a a a a a a E .t a > > > > > > > > > �. •r+ a; > > > > > > > > .0 .-� � ,-t v-t H '.t •rt •rd •rt •.-t O G� 1r to to N W c Q N N N 0 c U p to to to N c N N th N C E C ,� m 0 7 7 O tr.. 7 x 7 7 + V' a9 O O O O tr1 z O 7 7 V' O l+ .L t--t r--i -r1 rt rt n -4 rt r-� • `!. .0 rl '-1 r--t r-'1 • rl .-� r-! r-1 N cc < L U U U U U U U U U O S U U U '• > G G G G H G G t= C G .-1 H H H H H �J) H M H H "1 V: H H H H V: H H H H, fr t E >• E c: rL d C co N 1+ R td C � H G a F-i •ri L M i ri +� a c o 0 o a c o o+ c a :j ,> C:� t^ c c to a tt+ o c! to Ln N rn' Cal.Ca n uCi 1^ z dtv to o ' y .iV� a V a w a N .� y m W et <n w a y Vii � > i r4 Co a 1+ ;r+ .r1 - , •C7 •r > >> > > N tll E u r_ t� O c to C to to a to C c Oat }.c to En C 'oto c ami two 4) 0 c >, to O C C c a C 7 0 u O C O cd N :j O C O C ::� O u C G E: C, t OL w •r>t " u Gtnc uo u u r- uo to c=: .14L) uu gn C UC; u u Eo c G C-, G -A G .-t .1 �- w G G -t C tv. C: t= •rc -4 N Hp H f N " (r HH .] Hv v HP: HH 1-4 <n ? Nv u U U . > U r-t C C N a s a s a s d a a E-, G N a a a a a tU a s U O •ri U > > > > > > > > > O +1 a > > > :► > > > > .i .� ri •r vi .1 t -H •rd t1 r-1 b •rt •rt r4 vA -rt t4 U U 14 W to 0 to O w to N N to O U U H to to t^ to O N N to N C C; 10 ? O a 7 trl 0 0 0 0 to a tU O O O O to O V 0 0 Vl t•4 x r-1 r t .-i M • r t r-t r-4 r•1 r-t • 'L7 .� H r-t t-t rt • r-1 r-t rt r-4 a Q U U U U U t� U U U U U t� -H Q U U U tJ U r-t U U U U r-t sj G G r. G r-I G G 9 G G r-t .0 G G G G r-t a C C G r•+ ch H H H V) H H 1-4 1-4 VT U t-7 H H H H VJ H HHH V} , .0 p S O t•+ �• co j O i. O L bC a O 11 L 00 a U v l { •rt ?^ a s G u a ct1 tt H tU a G 1 t a to •� U . N G U U cJ to U •r-► to C U U L1. U a C) a .-t U < U a a s 4-4 to co s. V4, a .i H U to 1. - >cHn v v to> r-t v v co a l R O G td a •r•t 0 O .; ato L V v t.: O aaN u U O vt t3 a O O -ri N CO L W Or t u U a Q' u A O rt CIC U a ¢' co N '1 1+ C 0.- H td N vi (IN N t+ G 0. t . G .c to W L ty ti; O L O 0 v t w p L rJO O •.1 (: to U + .c: U rt H v-t t~ to a -4 X W H t3 O ++ bo t: u 1• ii :t B rt bo a U 1• u t0 1 [' i; .v Ci to C= F 1+ vi &I ci La iC �_ •C1 :� (.) •.t t" G V. •LJ 7 O -4 P. O W H Q V. ;.G APPE4DIX II • Spay nnA Neuter Clinic Program Proposed Work Statistics For Fiscal Years 1972-73 and tQ73-74 F, ANIMLS PROCESSED 1972-73 1973-74 '•fedical Examinations p2ys Cats Total. Dogs Cats Total Male 464 546 1,010 816 961 1,777 Female 4,994 1,952 61946 4,791 3,432 12,213 TOTAL 5,459 2,498 7,956 9,5Q7 4,193 13,990 Injections Male 296 662 949 504 1,163 1,667 Female 3,123 2,747 5,870 51491 4,297 10,322 TOTAL. 3,409 3,409 6,418 51995 5,994 Il,QQ9 Sur er ' Male 604 740 1,344 1,961 1,307 2,363 Female 6,156 2,438 8,594 10,600 4,287 1.4,477 TOTAL 6,760 3,179 r!,r3R 11,661 5,589 17,250 7r. REVF\IIF. 1972-73 1973-74 Receiots 2LS Cats Total Dogs Cats Total Male S 6,946.00 S -9,510.00 S 15,456.00 S 12.,201.50 S14,973.0r) S 27,174.50 Ferrate 107,730.00 424665.00150,395.n0 145.500.nn 75,027,50 266,5?2. 50 TOTAL, REVENUE $114,676.00 551.,175.00 5165,851.00 5197,701.50 SRq,4Q5.9n -,?q7,6Q7.0n IT, %L II1I., :dA';NOt;RS 1977_-73 2473-74 Gross Net Gross Net n - Veterinarians 7,080 6,704 12,451 10,964 6 - Veterinary Asst. 7,080 6,708 12,480 109948 3 - Clerk Typist 4,086 3,780 6,240 5,464 TOTAL IS,240 17,06 31,7rin 77,4?0 B s 1972-73 1973-74 i:SPrNDITURFS Total Total Salaries S1n4,585 5184,800 Expense: Animal Regulation S3Q1016 $40,967 Public Buildings 25,059 17.,530 i" Righf of Flay and Land 19,35E _5q,068 Sub-Total 83,431 111,565 Equipment 47,61.2 TOTAL 5235,628- 5296,365 V. A.MORTI7.ATION PLAN-ANNUAL COST Salaries 104,585 194,800 Expense: :Medical Supplies S39,016 540,967 Building Tease (20 Yr.) 5,762 14,517 Installation-design costs (20 years) _I,253 1,:380 46,61 57,364 Equipment: 10 year life 2,096 2,0^(, 20 year life 1 935 11915 4,031 4,031 TOTAL ANNUAL AMORTIZATION COST 5154,642 5246,195 General City Overhead - Annual Cost: Computed at 10 percent salaries In,453 18,480 T07AT, SPAY AND Nr[71F:R CLINIC PROGRAM COSTSS1h5,105 g264,675 VI. C0X1'AH Y F,)N-RF'VFNUL AND EtPENDITURrS Reve"Ll $165,951 S297,697 EXPC-1131tLres (Adjusted) 165,105 264,675 Estimace Net Revenue Over Clinic Costs 8746 g a I 11111114111 AJIJ t r •.0+� 1+l { r � - r � (C)_L 0 � • r TOJ� lw t 0', Attitudes of animal control officials and humane groups toward animal overpopulation and spay clinics have put increasing pressure on the veterinary profession. Part 1 of this series focuses on the spay controversy from their viewpoint. In our next issue, programs established and run by DVMs will In turn be reviewed. AN MVP STAFF REPORT otir own business? In a previous article {AIVP, Aiarch 1971), we concluded with a *'We have always hcifcvcd that spayjncutcr question: "Do Ave want to expand our use- programs to control the surplits animal l,i , on our own terms, or arc we willing !tc>pui:ttion should be the responsibility of to gamble that a business-aspolicy vrtrrinarfanc, {but} vetci inary assaciatiolls will not backfire on us?"' 7n the two years thiotighout the country have failed miser- ably fit their obligation to the coltutlunity.,' since, the profession 11:15, with few excep. tions, taken that gaatblc. L•lsewherc, coil- 'I'his t.:Ati s:uci by ltcuy C::u�cloni, a htnlianc ecrnecl groups leave iustltutcel significant exe•et+tivr. Stich has been tile pl•ograins which stay seriously alfeet all :+ttitucic ofmanyhuuiauc ol'l;anizations vetcrinari:uls. Only a brief prrspcctive ort tt,i`:trtl file vete:iu:uy profession, and many file ovcrpoputatioll problem will iuctiratc DVAIN have Councl thcntsclvcs fn amllivaIcllt why gic•atcr concern over animal control ,itu,1ti+,uti %viten the clucstioll of Spay Clinics is ilrgrnt. 11.1s :,t iNvil. While lrtnitallc glotelis have been advo- According; to recetit roltsctralitrc esti- eatiltr altitttal biltb control, iescarchers mates, 2000 to 3500 eiogs and cats are born %1wiitlfog; illttcatiing; amooms of tituc in in the U.S cvciy hotter, while oilier stirveys Ihfs air,+, alld gove•lnlliellial agencies alto. indicate 10,000 attimals per linter, or allolit c:16111; olruc:lied Moir lnunry. slic vcicrilrary :15 ulillicrte l►oppics aocl 50 litiiliou hitictis l,rt,lraf+,n Jim for tile- tr+osi part beim mind. each year. With (lily -13 million families in its), its otvn business. t::tu we aiforcl u1 mind file U.S. it is iulnicil alely evident that there Morc6, 1973 as bring born. Tlit s, file new al►Irtoarb to ccs one bitch can animal rcmtrol has br•rontr cont tat r•ption. 'I'hc 11111%1 popular nfc•tbocl of atllit•vinl; this tfheoirtically %rive ruse t o would be the developnlc•rtt of a rhral, hill • or injcc tine which worth) rlfrr tivrly orr- 67, 710 offspring ili/e 111.11% aucl, especially, fc•tnalr. gels. The �s problem is that no stint wonder %trot; is in S1.1.`yeai`s within sight. Drag contp:utic% romrdr that they won't have anythinl; for yrars. An in- jectable eontrarepfive for frn►ale cats and is a hu.-c surplus, and many of these animals clogs was on the market for Iwo years, but cod up in the sirem and/or (lead in shcl- it was withdrawn in 1966 best% of ttn- tcrs. .bract 11.3 million dogs and cats (d2"Jo desirable side efrccts. 110111 lipjohn and of file total population) are destroyed an_ Syntex are presently working 011 new cors- nually its private and public shelters at a trarcptives, bm neither company offer% any cost approaching $100 million. Iaefl dis. hope for the near future. crnrnting animals which clic of disease, mal- At Colorado State Ilnivrrsity, Dr. Lloyd treatment and starvation, those which stir- C. Faulkner bas been rescar(hing file pns- vive each rear will acid tremendously to the sibility of using hormones for animal birth growing problem. control since PffiR, but progrrs% it slow. At f i'!tc cause of this problem is obvious: a recent meeting of animal control officials, doh-% and cats arc highly prolific. Farly pu- Dr. Faulkner said he did not expe(t to hrrty, short pre;gttancy and big litters make have a marketable product for R to 10 clog,; allow 15 times, and cats 30 In 95 times years. Similar cowracc•ptivc re-car.h pro- as fertile as htinlans. Under totally ancon- grants are under way at other nnitcrsitirs, trolled breeding, with a hitch producing 10 (Virginia, Gcorgia, Cni iirll) but notrc prorn- pups (5 male and 5 female) ttt•ice yearly, ises fast results, and file m•rrpopttlation and with all female offspring repr(xlucing crisis continues to grow. It has been stfg- similarly, I bitch can theoretically give rise gested that an obsctire California firm to 67,710 offspring in f► years. More realistic (Ag-rophyslcs) will market a birth control calculations indicate that up to 9900 off •device" for females (luring 1973, hitt this spring would be born within 7 years under information has not been -%veil sulwanti- optimal conditions, and about 72 tmcicr ated, and scientific reports 011 this product controlled ronditions. Even at rile lowest have not been made_ available. rate. it is readily apparent that clogs pro- duce too many offspring for society to han- Between here and "(lie pill" are. several (Ile. And figures on cats (which reproduce at ),cars (at ]cast), and file only available an unbelievable logarithmic rate) arc even me.hod to prevent unwanted births in ani- 11101*e frightening. mals is spaying and castration. Of course With animal numbers increasing at the DVAfs have long offered these services to present rate, the old standby metbods (or the public, at a price, but it is now becom- application) of animal control, involving ing evident that sonic persons cannot afford leash laws, licensing, capturing strays and to have their animals neutered at the going dccfro%•ing thorn, have failed. At best, these rates, and many others feel that the vctrr- { nteacurec only help to protect humans from inary profession should lower these rates being conlpletel)• overran in areas where in file interest of the general public and %nab• populations arc highest. To compli- the environment. cart• the task faced by animal control offi- The profession has largely rcfnsed to 1 cial%, nr:ur) citizen tirottps have begun to succumb to pressure from special interest launch attacks against public shelters be- groups advocating low-cost spays. Though cause of overcrowding and methods of some state and local associations oto co- operate with programs established by hu- If file population problem cannot be mane organizations and local animal con- solved by killing excess animals, then it trol officials, these programs often involve ` bc•contes necessary to prevent them from spays at the prevailing rates, with the spon- 24 MODERN VETERINARY PRACTICE (lilt interference. Now that spay (linits are t pippin}; ill) aroltlld file county, crlrll;ic•s �] have hccn directed toward sloppirll; the ,�"✓ 1 "stray fever" before it affects a wide svg- r ntcnt of file profe%%ion. As rt prn'Icd in a recent i mie of (AVtiIA, the AVXfA (:omidl on Velt•rinary Srlvicv% stated that spry clinirs "mtl%t br, con%idered :Is lisle of Idle pees%iblc %ofllttom" to Ihc ani- mal conlrol problem. Hill 111ry su;�;rsttd, Iill%le.1d, that the 1►c%I 1111•.111% Io control tile. :utilltal population itllltlde (1) enrolling existing laws, (2) tlt:og;inq hil;11rr license fees for intact animal%, (3) litemill" and I romrolliti cats, (I) rduratinl.; flee ImMir. ' and (5) ncutc•ritlg; all atlitltals lc Ira,rci hots 1 private and public %lintel." it•, anything but cfinirs! �`�- ±,•� 'I'hc stray clinic controversy is ccntr]ctl j in f ccs Angeles, tvitcre life first immicil,ally operated Spay &- Ncutcr Oinic opened its doors to Ihc ptlhlic in Feln nary 1971. The promlyl,e clinic otrnpied a reilloclek-d acc- t — film of an animal Shelter alld teas t•cluipped 1 with the best pos%iblc hardware. Dv.'i ncd to operalt• on .1 brcwk-even basis. sp•tyitl" (tlfkq or cat) Iva% offercd to all comers fill- $17.50 or$17.50 and castration for $11.50. These prices inclt]eled a prestlrg;ical examination, Dr.Willis Vansell,DVM, prepares cat for surgery at illoc'tllalions, anesthesia. sill-g ery :ltd post- los Angeles public low cost Spay & Neuter Clinic. stirgiral care. "Impossiblel" Avas the reac- tion from Ilic vcit•rinary prufes%iun. Al Ihc%( %oring olgallirations pickilig up all or p:tl't l,ticts file tax-p:tying; public: Ivotlltl be sup- of th(; 1.11) fur scrvires rolulered, and the porting; every freeloading; pet otviler IvIlo clients l,ayirtg; the balance. In other words, didt]'t want to pay the fees in private thele is no looney lost to lite practitioner. t•liuics. There have hccn no major organized ef- Regal-dicss of many con plaints by lural foil% by the velel itl:tly lnofession at large vetcrimiri:ms. and ivith support from local to att:u k the ptol,lrnt of animal overpoptl- humane associations, file spay clinic ope•tivd. latic,n, %o l;lc,ttps tonlrrned with animal with city veterinarian Walter E. Zeit-Itr (unt:ltrption have looked ekewitere for directing; its operation. A short tittle later 1101). '1 It(- l{uvel n11tt•nl ha% ]tow bcc•omc Ilse 1111% 11'illis Vallsell, a Ivell•respvcIed pracli- mai11 %tittle of altscct•1% to til(` ovcrpopnLl- tiont•r. Iva% villployc•d to rtnt tl,e clinic, atld Iiun (Iisk. lI i, .11 1111, l,oitu 111.11 the pro- I)r. %(•iglu rrt11ncd to other dudes. The It•„lull hat% Iw(ontt• A.11111vd. lime t11e sol[]- clinic has pro%pe•rt•d in %pile of protests. tion 1114m corttlnortly sljggc%tat is the spay :incl the progran► is slatrcl for expamiun. :tad neuter c Iinic-. T%vo move %pay lilt[ limiter clinics are ` Tilt. tu•lc tbotight of .t/my dirties has plallnctl for the near future, Ivith I total malty %IvIrl iu:n i:u1% and nlo%t a%soc iations of 5 prujecfctl. 111, in :11111,. 1'1t•vinit%ly, all 111( rr:t%ous why In file few utuntlt, rndirt,; the firm fiscal a vett t 111.11 i:ut %hould not. betula( iuvulvctl yvar of ol,c•ratiort, tilt Irl Spay & Nctilcr in lucv 1ij%l spaying; %vere cc•1tic-led alotlrld (ail:ic- perfill nit-d •gal surgeries. A chug in Ili% i11.11i1 tlabtc ri"Ill to 1)t• paid justly for flat- hot Let. Ili fiscal year 71-72. with tine Ills %rt vis t, and ul,t•]atc his business with- IMI oil duly. 211111 animals Ivcre 111411 •s,ccl Mards, 1973 25 IliftY►IIlia thiel ll:nv• 'll"wo i111clrs1 ill .� • ��. . . 111 j ! ( lablisltinl; sitllil.11 Intg;t:ttc►s, and st yr tat 1111. / % ' j1•� �`��y. nlattc• 011;.,niiali,►us bavr altrculy t31u•nr•11 Y 1,7.2-70 Clllllllals will be ow(11%1 spaytliuits, liul Ihisrxp:utsi0n has t�1� ..._.... ``'lielllolvd. and the city 1101 slopprd at the (:.Ili(Olnia br►Idrr; 1hr ' LA Dcl3:utn•111 of Animal I(c•:nl.►lion Itas o Lo lingeles ttctivcd afoul :1111! retluests lot inf0lnati0n on Iltc operation and (easibility of spay 1(•111 realize a profit 1" clinics, from 21 g;ovcl11nlc:nlal rr.ptesc:Iua- 1 of I`93 09 orer its fives :Intl 85 hi m:rrte mg;inirati0ns. Anl icome from :12 %1;11(-% :,fill 5 nluirirs have 1111'('.Sllll en 1111 tax tit oney rorcirn counlrics. 11 is very appatr11t. that :, j�� tvitle porlion of Illy. coltntny to,llrl be aI• - .11 :I 1111.11 t41.1 of- �1711•..' It► taxpayers: the felled fly lowtost spay clinic~ opr►atrd 19'13 ► I rt(fit t 1 • flo n ies near d rovcl.c,td t ithrr by g�ovc•rfinu•rtt or (more, likely) by � • t sn 1-t-1 concerned cilimn g ioltps. fv• t . ' , I: S C H III(- to't of, operating file clinic. h:lrective •• CLZRK e^ ,�o Qr- S Ft-limen-y 1!17'2. Dr. Vamell resig;ncd his Accorcling 10 Los Atlg;cles offtt ial%, QNTR ( PERVISQRs C A COSTA CO. po,t, but two 1)\•\Is (Drs. David \Varrcn a ~pay -incl Nether Clinic l'10g;tanl is .I 1�Y � -- ._ Deputy :111(1 John 011111:111) have repim-cd him, and (.114.4live and nloderll conept (if animal four others have alrcady been chosen to I)o1,111alion control Imess:ny to Irlotcct the opt-rale Ihc spay clinics scheduled for open- lu•alllt :end welfare cif the community." Though veterinarians may disagicc•, they j for (im al Near 72-7:5, the Department of 11111%1 achnit that Ihc Inogratn hay wol k-f-d j 1 :\Ilinrll Kcg;nl:lion has projected .1 total So far (in Icrlm of clinic 11111(Iitnl) in Los suI err) count of 9918, with a S.7-1f) profit Angeles. I foto much Illis prog;rafif will ac:- to the city. The clinics are beginning to do wally affect the animal overpopulation wore than hre:Ik rtcn. With six 1)VNTs Olt pi •oblcm remains In be seen, but file very stall in 7:1-71, each performing; -in estilnatccl fact that the spay clinic pays for itself over- I'_' to 13 0per-itirnts daily, 17,250 animals any possibility of file prog;ran► being will he neutered, and lite city of l..os disanuinucd. \n;c ICs will rcaliic a profit of $21,02' ewer (:alifnrnia velcrincu•i:ttts have continued its intcstnitnt in tax money. In oppose the clinics 10 no avail. The 1310- 1 ' 'Hw cost breakdown of the clinic: in- hcant is totally sttl3potte•cd by g;overnnn•nt c lodes salaries of clinic penson11t•I, c(Iuip_ ollicials. According; to :fit LA Dcp:u•tlncrtt nlcnt. snJ3plics. "encl-A city overhead. (•tc. of Animal Rcgnlation status report. "'1-hc: OI'I►t,ncnt. of Ihc• p,.o rant Ilat•c sU;;g M.estecl most recent clfol-t to 11:u•rass governmental :Itientes Op]G'allllgr or crntsi(icring; to 0per-ile Ihm the acco11milt� is not specific enough, an,( that it is Unrealistic because of low SI)ay and Neuter Clinic Programs tr-ins- ovel Bead costs (tile cit)• owns the buil(ling), pired on November 9. 19721,•• when a Cali- Ito taxation, and hidden costs (possibly at fornix state senator (himself a licensed adI]Iinistration lrtels). Despite such argil- D111\1) spearheaded an anienchnent which 1u•nts. Ilse clinic Shows a profit above the Ito►Ild have p►•ohibiled the use of 0111-of- nnun111t appropriated to the clinic itself, state I)V\fs in spay clinics Unless they were and other cxpcn(IitUr(s by the llepartntcnt sttpervised by limiscd California DV\Ts. T of A16111al Rcgulaliotl would be nta(le if -I-hc -imcl]dntcnt passed the Senate, bat the ( 11111,( Wcrt• not in existence. Iminane group lobbyists were largely re- 11 is dearly (•idem from the financial N"Isihh: for killing; it in the Assembly. t,•„iIds of Ihc spay clinic that a city-cwt Spay clinics continue to ]lire otll-of-slate Spat 1m)t;t:111t need 1101 he a bur(Ien on the DVINis with tite Inavision that they become t.Ixp:,cer,, :nut this slakes it very attractive licensed in California within a year. to 011wr cities with animal overpopulation This incident, and others like it, have left pr0blcw-, •I he county of Los Angeles is a feeling; of tension and antagonism be- now pl:nuting;a spay and neuter clinic blue- ttveen lWiMs and those concen]cd with ani- , limited after the LA city prototype, other mal population control. Government and 26 MODERN VETERINARY PRACTICE l►tirtt.ttle I;toeps tray seem to Itat•C little ruts- tc•rtl for the prohleuts of the 11r:►ctitiotter t` :1(1d nlan) Iilinl:tl ron(rof oflicials feel that DVAIs are only inft•re,1ed ill money, with little rt;gattl fof• file greater ell virottuteurtl I,tul,lc•ms caused 1>�• :11tin1al Orc•rpopulalion. � i "�; ►:y \. I.:\ city t•ctcrin.16.111, 1)1-. lcigier has a ) onitloe insight it►to Will Sides of the con- 1 i1 tru�rr,), I Ie mired atter ocuty )•can's of sic- tc•,sful praticc ilk P:t.adena anti was cut- l,lc,tc•tl by the city tihol tly bt•fore the .spay f � L rlittic prcn;ratit tvas e,tablisllecl. Ile says: f i '•The animal up ,elation ex plosion is re;rlly in rite 1-val►►t of the :etiutal co►tlrol oflue1. (:ettl) his only tool nosy is the shay :ell teeter clieic, shite t•l►ctttival or hor- trtut►al inl►ibitcns arc )Ct lO he pl-ovelt. 'I'1►e I tctc•rieari:et feels that sorgcry is tlot file :cestwer lilt' tu:tity rcasous, otic bc•inti 9ov- I 4-t uuu tit intcrlcrcvtce, (till) vcterinariatls , leel tl►at clic ntl111ber of :oliallAs Ihc•y spay in :t Clay is really so much more 01.111 our — jni,cnt spay clieic c:ut dO. ]int they :tie not Mrs. [lefts Yorty, wife of Los Angeles Mayor Sam Yorty, jrrojectitl.q this into the future. What if we observes as Dr.Vanselt prepares cat for surgery. c-slablisll spay clinics tltlotighoet the static. :will► \ rltintbcr of n1cr1 doirti; the suI•I;crics? the actual sj,ay and Heftier prot;►'atn. if TIICn our 11ftinbers will i11ov;vic too. At the vcteritt runs took Ovcr the 1pronnani, it plv,cnt tittle, )'CS, they arc doing nt:uly pyo lilt be a good tV.ly to prevent the city ,Wore, but that's redly a poor ;it-gonletlt, from I;oin;; on to so►eetltit►;; else. ".\eother arl;umrnt is tl►at many of tits "We have a $10.'I utillion bond issue pc•ttl,le %vIto cotcte to the prescut slpay incl c0111ing till. This involves rchoildinl; five of 1tc•ute•r a litlic can ce•rtairlly well alloud [lie otlr• shelters Ivitlt spay :111(1 nc•titer clinics Is fres ifnolvccl. Whc•►1 1 ►yas ie practice t felt part of the entity, also tvifit ve•tcrin:tl-y fat- thc ,:title %way. I didn't rcaliie that :tei►n:fl tilifies. If this passes, file veterivari:uts ac toluol ►wan seri .1 1,roblc11l. I practical for n4)t only 1;oin1; to be concerned with spay )Ctrs, sheltered i1( Pasadena, a11d really acct neuter clinics, but (also with) coin, ,�.,,o'( atware Of what twc►s going; o1( fere plete veterinary services at each shelter.' (ill I.:\). The tttiutal poptilutiurt is such I)r. %c•iglcr indicated the rrasotl complete that it rtlt re:ell)• get out of handl I k11uty veterinary facilities we're rlcecled ty:ts that that ole or t►wo %pay a11d neuter clinics llere oflici:ds thought file city ttias being ovcr- a11t1 thetc aft nut really goilig 10 h:eve all chatlj;ed by 1n:111y DV11s for treatment of inonetli:ee cpcet oil (lie :titi11ud population, injured animals brou'-Ill to the shehet:s, i4-•, it's a I,t gitt►tifig: it's soltlet.hiug we by rerldcrinl; ttlorc service than ve(lith-ed for (;111 tic,, first aid. Ile said that the city 4-oold easily "1'rterit►:u Taus had :eltl)le opl,orttiuity to 1,1111 its o►wr1 rabies clinics with such facili- t t;tt t till, I,1ug1:11t►, bot they clicttt't do it. tics, a11d t11ight olfc•r toltlplelf: vett•I•illary 1tt 'tr lfa,! ;t i;t,;ot) of nut tvalitinl; to r1(- services Ott :I 1tle•tli(.al c•ertte•r stale. Ile alsu ` „i,t tate will) Ilu•,e f)•l,t•, 4 protiranl,." 14, intlicaled that such cli114% toold relnc,ent heel put�llt y 11eallh :11111 :n till(ial Ilte vtu;�ua►d of >ocialiiccl trtt•rirt:u v uu•di- itc,entilt.ttt1)n I,to;;l:nn, .t, r�:Ouplcs of .11cas 4-itic. u11e1r 11V\Is b:1ce bren eX(lttdt-tl hv(;Io.e \1'hc•1c• rat such ptun-t:nnx dv%elop? The „i thc•it ttuuiilifivoc „ Io hetoum iuvolsecl, I.:\ .111iu,a) 4-4)11[11)1 t,ilui.th ate ptuntotio" I le• ,.11(f, *TvI1.11It'll 1.4)1, aIe rt11,ft• 40111ef IlCd sp.ty :1111 et•uler pto;•1.1111s to :,►►)One• into- ct,Ilt file clors►iorl 1)I I;O4-ettlnu n►.►) iuler• voc-11, sa iog 111.11 Ilwir 11111141111rr 1►tu;t.un Ictrit,1. toil, p,iv.lte lit i%(, 111a01 with ". c•:r►1 lie applied in a Ivs,vl- or 91c.110, Murcf,, 1'!73 27 9 _ 110:1cr .Ind in a %.idc• %alirlr of sotlntl alt- slrur-d h%• Ihc.. l;►oill Slrtiltiatloll sst►l;r•►y 11114.1111)11% I,% IIIc%I tonnnunitic•s with snlli- is finer(' :11 141 to t/., fill IIIc going ►air, rir•- twill .116111A popul.111on to susfairl Illi Itrr>• prstdinl; fill Ihr• me:c. (:af% :err- %Imp-d fell I Io%%v%cr. Ilwv do poitu out Ihat Ilie $12.50 It) .515.011, anti (-hofs lot $20 It) Ii,Ff, %hould lu• :rtttint•nI(-d by other dept•nlling ort Ilie sill- alit) rortrlilinrl of Illy nu.)•olrs tit tonnol tb< anistt.tl popnllatir_n• artirlrll. Move crnlll,litalrrl opr•Iatiom rill \1.11.1t :fir Iltc••r nt•asulc•s? Tiley arc• tss(-n. Loge dos may I fill :1 hit higher. but IIIc• I've 1611% lite %.fill(- as those proposed by the is %fill Winch lower Ih:ut nfilnl:Il• Dminl; AVNI \ 0/111161 cttt \'c•trrinaly Sc•Ivice: (1) 197.1 Po Avii%lancc tcfl-rted morn- than .► dillc•)c•ttti.d liuvivw N.C. whitlt provides an :11.000, anti Alcrcy (:rusadr, over' 12.000 ail. intt-116%(- lot* owfirrs 11) har%r their pets irttals for low•tost slcriliiation. .tc•tilt/c•d• (2) a luau.me animal education OIlitial% of S(:V,\IA have slu)kcn againrt In1+gt.)nt rel increase• ownc•I' I(-sponsibility. 1,1)111 p logr:usts cm nnnttous o(rasiolm At- a) stilt( c•ttlortrmc•nt Ili t)gra ills to achieve ording Io Itchy (:atrlorti. "IIIc S(:V\1:\ lull tompli:ntce %wifll artirttal control lams, spokcsule•n bast: hart of their all;tuncnl cost ressivc PR program Willi alt the assumption that Irnert Ic1s I,rfidurr in actt•nt on tilt• need for stcriliiing pets• ferior work. Over the 12 years we limo•, (cm- Ofie of tits most advanced concepts in diluted out• progr:ust, the• perrentage of 1a- animal ronlrol prac-lited by file I,A Depart- talities has been no more than would nor- ; nrc•nt of Animal Regulation is aur ctlticatiolt molly or•crtr in any velcrimoy ptactire. I.-Io;rant developed for school children front \Vhel cil}te oI•g:fitiiation sax c%•(-st su%• I kindcrti:11-It-11 through grade six. Animal 1)(ctecl a vetcrirlat•ian of l)rrfotluirtl; less : Icgularloll officials provide a teacher pro_ than smisfa(tory work, Ile has bveli imnte- gran kit, (ilius. books lists anti animal con- diately dropped from the programs." Irol olliccrs to make children aware of the In further support of the spay programs, ani11131 o%c•t•I,opulmion problem enc]to teach \Is Girdoni said, "No far :I% st:ntrlauds are them %wa%s in which they can help. Like concerned, when %ve humans require hos- Ili(- spay Ino;.;rant, this measure is not likely )it tliiafion, ac would all like to be able to have immediate results, but in the long to .afford deluxe hospitals with rccl•rtrpct run it is creating better pct o%vners for the treatment. When %we cannot afford it, %ve future. ;ire very happy that lower-cost clinics and Veterinarians in Southern California have County General f lost)ital are there to pro- shown increasing concern about the well_ vide the needed rncclical care. The same 01'gattiml grlowth of the Los Angeles animal holds true for animal erre, but there is no control program, but this program is not County General Ilospilal or other low-cost the only one in operation. Several humane facility to turn to." qlrl+ups which offer low-cost spat's and sub- In reference to the profession at large, sick/• o%wnt•rs who cannot pay are fiercely ]1Is Cardoni said that veterinary associations opposcd by Ili( Somlicrrt California V\IA, - have consistent]}• opposed public low- mole so because SC\'\I:\ members work cost spay/neuter clinics with all their might, with these groups. The foremost of these in much the same fashion the A\fA op- or;;:utiiations :ire Pct :\ssist:ufcc hounda posed Medicare. This has not hurt the in- tion. :utcf \lc•rc%• C:rusadc, Inc, which have comes of human doctors in IIIc least, and bcl-n in opc ration for 18 and 12 }'cars, re- there is no reason to believe the clinics %p•(mck. Both „roups :ire dcdirmcd to %%.r,ulcl hurt the incrnncs of %dcrin:uiaus." I,I1+ttctilt; animals :out eonnolliiig over- She indicated, Iuoreover, that the awnia- pllpul.itilnl Ihloul;h %williiation. tion have ". . . tailed miserably in their ob- :11c1+tding to Ilett\. Cardoni, executive ligations to the c-onnunnity, %with file single director of Mc•ruy (:rusadc, both organiza- objective of holdill" their monopoly on vet- IM11% ,illi to help pct owners who cannot crinary rrtedicine. They are .%rimming up- allord the prevailing fees; clients arc rc- stream against the tide, and unless they ` (erre(( to about 50 cooperating DVNIs ntalernice their thinking and stop trying 28 MODERN VETERINARY PRACTICE RETAIL CLERKS UNION SAO " L KO. 1179 CHARID BY RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL OCIATION AFFILIATED WITH AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer President WILLIAM C. RODDICK D. BILL HENDERSON 4121 ALHAMBRA AVENUE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 TELEPHONE: (415) 228-8800 0 160 Aug ups t 28, 1973 -z--r r PA-AS- r�A RD OF SUPF-RVIS0�3 l i Rl'C .:)A A G03;A CO. ewltY At Diaz, Supetcvi4 on Adminizt ation Bui d,i.ng Ma4ti.nez.. Ca 94553 Dean Mn. D.i.a,6: I have been .instAuc ted by the member s o6 this Union to urge your zuppo/ t of the pnognam o6 SPAY of Contlra Costa County and to maze avaitabte $50,000 bon tfi';z prLog&= &nom revenue zha t i.ng bunds. YOUA6 t u t y, AWL. D. B.iU HendeAzon, Ptea.c.dent DBH:dc IMI 1.111.O/ SYr1O01 f11M1 ' WdA11�111pr,{�� Un' -v� 1.,M A 27, /973 . A.ldiad RC T--\I Ei Boa�rd o� Supertvc.doird All - Wa zd S#icee� 4°v. i. �', S � l Ca,Ci,��(M/lir.{ CL�Rf< ARD SUP ;trR OSTA Oy �__. R_.........__.._...... . Dean A. A.l aw and Boaird o� Supeavilaa w: /?e: Lad iced' D,i,.dcua.di.on -q-,roup and Chi"n-'.e �wup Soing #o the weeldl# di dcu Own pwup .Led by Co" llezUA Nwcde Mw. Al Crum Aad ae&d;&d .in a new coq-Gene in mgde.V and an unfnoveneni in mrd ze.lati.on h p #o /uwband, my ch,i,ld, 4aiendd and acglvinAwtced. 71vwugA the a conmua#,iond the aut 04 undo.Lved deptediiond and pzob- iew uA ch a.LL mo#hora have to a d"e have ieedene4 Beaauee o4-the change S am mace at ease, AeL moire capable #o hand,[e mohhe&iood and have a.lsdo .deen oAe t uomeen ma#wte in chawc-i-ea--gaouxrrg inio moire wP.LL- ad pot d .Gzdj-ed .in the wn=unU* 7hzough the .dam P&y..uV o� gamd a d CWftd P& pWechoo.L O eR moray . i"Ie oned aite Zw&ni;ng .inwzZable Leeeone in hwwn. Aelatimi. Aj moray umwit, .&he mgee 4 mm-4- a�p,?d -to pay 4o4 the nuoweV hAw .lezm _. trig .ei hm.;tion h16A pby gaoup jtaa ch i,lal%en 41 .impa hmf- ad uw.0 ad con- _ w-nient became o4 the pzhiesing being held .loort1y. 9 am Aanftbd P,% the pie.den# discard dion group and ureelldy cJ:.i ldicen.d ac.&vi.iy time. .7 hope ;1u.d cont inue.e .in the Ad uAe a d we U ad Aeie ate no eimi laz cy/coupd o� #lug na&w .in the aicea. YOulw 4=4 _ - (&a.) Linda in Paxeon Mr.S Mrs. Joseph E. Paxson Frontier Trailer Court 90 San Pablo Dam Rd., Space 22 San Pablo, California 94806 i 3 16 tjsi cp �r � D . AUG 2 91973 W. 1. PAASCN 0 OLGPtFt BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RA COSTR,CO, OY Deputy C O C 7 C } w ev E 3 E WU MARTINEZ OLB17b (1742) (2-196221E241 )PD 08/29/73 1742 L ICS IPMRNCZ CSP 4158614726 TDRN SAN FRANCISCO CA 17 09-29 0542P EST FMS BOARD OR SUPERVISORSY TONE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY �w MARTINEZ CA a URGE YOU NOT TO ALLOCATE REVENUE SHARING FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF COUNTY JAIL REV ROBERT M DAVIDSON� JOINT STRATEGY AND ACTION COMMISSION NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ECUMENICAL COUNCIL MGMOAKA OAK y�s aos 0 fa 2-158386E240 08/28/73 W ICS IPMRNCZ CSP ,�4157994526 MGM TDRN RODEO CA 1dH*0V-%U8!%PfAilgram ' R 0 ZIP 94553 !� • RECE E e�► • SUPERVISOR AL DIAS A13P 23 `'1973 COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS i W. T. P A A S C H • I CLERK 00ARD OF SUPERVISORS MARTINEZ CA 94553 ` " CK; PJ,RA COS—,A CO. z :v Deputy ® • • MR DIAS APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERN REGARDING THE RODEOCHILD DEVELOPMENT _ CENTER. STRONGLY INCOURAGE YOU TO SUPPORT PEOPLE~ PROGRAMS 0 - NOT BUILDINGS AND ANIMAL SHELTERS. LETS HELP KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF JAIL INSTEAD. REVEREND DEAN CHARLES ELLERN PASTOR FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0 RODEO CA 1855 EST 0 MGMOAKA OAK � c ; 0 .z. • 0 • • �► i !� • 1! 0 0 0 c8 � r=i � r D d U /^ CD to N v t4 3 W y. r� r'1 ra � U� N110, � o \0 I rrS •• d 0 r i a t r n 00 �� �d OEM%dM =S 0 3� +� � i � �� � Y+ r•3 c'+ co PI V4 CD D ll CD N O t_y J`1 r� U� rA CAV (A1 IPA A r� -,C ' �� e4 lt•. .♦ i �n r �J L� ,tea G h • �' CD �- + to N 14 a •• rt ~ice �'•.�* ��1 -41 v - ; !� 71 C-Q C,T- I cz� a .. �=a r3 to { YQ V• � G tom' lei • `'"� �"j ��-. -.1 1 ) j D G %J C .. ; L--j tipQ EZpry 1_ -r� 4 T 1 �t +1 I M r � \ a a o T M f A _ M i IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing on Proposed ) County Budget for Fiscal Year ) Tuesday , August 28, 1973 1973-1974 . ) This being the time fixed for continued hearing on the proposed County Budget, proposed County Special Districts (other than fire districts) Budgets, and proposed County Service Area budgets for the 197;-1974 fiscal year, and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having sub- mitted the report of the Administration and Finance Committee of the Board (Supervisor Boggess and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid) detailing its recommendations on the proposed budget (a copy of said report being_ on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board) ; and The following persons having appeared to present requests or offer comments with respect to certain items included in the budget : Acting Sheriff Harry Ramsay, on establishment of a central laboratory for sobriety testing services ; appearing in support of same were Duayne Dillon, Chief, Criminalistics Laboratory, Office of County Sheriff-Coroner: Police Chief Edward Kreins , City of Pleasant dill; Police Chief Donald P. Burke, City of Walnut Creek; and Captain John huddleston, Concord Police Department ; Arts . Elizabeth D. Middione, Executive Director, Contra Costa County Association for the A11entally retarded, on workshop programs for the adult retarded; Mr. Sebe Hill, President , Carquinez Coalition (Crockett , Rodeo, Port Costa) , on Head Start and day care centers ; Mr. Carl Poirot , Social Service Department , that first priority on use of federal revenue sharing funds be for people services and that other matters , such as acquisition of land, construction of a spay clinic, and building be deferred ; Mr. Henry Clarke, Business Manager, Contra Costa County Employees Association, Local 1; Ms . Nancy Olander, member of the Volunteer Bureau of Contra Costa County , on the Friendly Visitor Program; Ms . Bertha Brown, member of Contra Costa Suicide Prevention Center: 1,7r. :Tillie Dorset, Executive Director, Richmond Community Development Corporation, on funding for Halfway Houses ; Ms . Anita Edwards , member of the Advisory Committee of the Contra Costa County Coordinating Council ; Mrs . Ruth Anderson, member, Family and Children's Services Advisory Committee ; and There being no other persons appearing to speak, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Thursday, August 30, 1973 at 9 :30 a.m. is FIXED as the time for continued hearing; on the aforesaid proposed budgets and for decision thereon. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote : AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None. ABSENT : Supervisor J . E. Moriarty. CERTIFIED COPY I certify that this is a full, true & correct copy of the original document which Is on file in my office, and that it wa:: pa;::ed &- ad,, ted by the Board of Supervisurs of C,,ntra C:.sta Cr>unty, California, on the dato s1iu% .t. .A'1'TEST: W. T. P.iASCH, county clerk .r- cx-officio clerk of said Board of Supervisors, by deputy clerk. cc : Administrator Auditor-Controller REPORT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMITTEE ON 1973-1974 PROPOSED BUDGET As indicated by the committee status report submitted to the Board of Supervisors on August 20, 1973, the Proposed Budget has been the subject of intensive and thorough review. The report advised that although substantial reductions to expenditure programs had been made and practically all proposed new program and services eliminated the reduction in federal financial participation in traditional budgetary areas has created significant problems. This factor plus the reduction in the fund balances available left the budget "unbalanced" by about 11.4 million dollars using the 1972-1973 tax rate and excluding use of Federal Revenue Sharing Fids. In view of the substantial Increase in the assessed value of many properties it is the opinion and strong recommendation of the Administration and Finance Committee that the taxpayers of our county not be subjected to any tax rate increase this year. Countygovernment is in a financial vise with the taxpayers demanding relief which is being felt at all levels of government; as a consequence the federal And state governments have resorted to reducing or eliminating financial aid in tong-standing partner- ship programs. The adoption of SB 90 simply makes legall binding a fact of life that is already a political reality in applying . restraints to property tax increases. On the other side of the coin are the insistent public demands for the many services necessary to provide for the diverse needs of contemporary society. The erosion of budgets by inflation which all of us are personally very aware of exerts tremendous pressure on the fiscal demands of government.. With the above considerations in mind, a total county budget of $1861,378,368-is recommended; this recaasaended budget includes appropriating the total balance of $5,033,951 in the Aacumulative' Capital Outlay Fund and $151,700,201 in the Federal Revenue Sharia : Fund. The budget as recommended and described in some detail- i�n- the material which follows will result in a countywide tax rate: (excluding the City of Richmond) of $2.830, a reduction of .3 of.a cent •from the 1972-1973 rate of $2.833. Inside the City of. Ricbnond the county tax rate will be $2.659 (excludes county. . Library tax levy of $0.271) me which is the saw reduction of .3 of a cent from the 19.72-19 3 rate of $2.662. RECEIVED T. P ASCH L13y . [R OA F SUPERVISORS N COST - aPoty I V /i 0 2. In order to "hold the line" on taxes this Board must make some hard decisions and take a firm stand in the fiscal strateggy� to be used to achieve this objective. This committee recomm�ds that the following actions be approved by the Board for the 1973-1974 fiscal year: 1. The county has been advised that the alloca- tion made by the State of California of federal funds to finance social services is limited to $6,771,000 which is 2.376 million dollars less than what was included in the Proposed Budget. This county has been aggressive in seeking federal funding for programs to provide for the needs of a substantial segment of our population. It is now abundantly clear that the county cannot sustain such an effort and we must reduce social programs to the financier eve es I tablIeftede Yederal an - Wmts A federalservices allocation deter- mined by a state formula which is uniformly applied throughout the state will tend to reduce social services provided by the county more toward a statewide average. In view of • the reduction in federal funds ava-llable for the 1973-1974 fiscal year and a strong possibility of greater cuts in subseqquent fiscal years, t hp eam r*e• rePnuam s that hA AQet fnr hp Snr-iAl SarviG! DO31mg+r±t be reduced to a level of services that can be wholly financed within the fiscal veil to do otherwise would • y Prolong the agony and result in ultimate d • int - ment to many. The budget detail at � hereto includes such a financial reduction. The procedures for implementation of program reductions in accordance with the budget provision is an administrative matter to be appropriately handled by the Human Resources Director. It should be noted that funds are budgeted to continue contort services, primarily child day care, for the period July 1, 1973 3 9 During this period, the Board of Supervisors, Hunan Resources Director and interested caamivaity leaders are urged to exert every effort to convince the State of California that it should assume responsibility for child day care. The Board should be aware that i _L 3. _thin recommendation involvied some "hard" decisions including staff layoffs. The number to be laid off is not known at this time but the department head should immediately develop plans with the cooperation and approval of the County Administrator to implement the reductions necessary to remain within the budget appropriation. 2. No attempt was made in the Proposed Budget to incorporate the revised fiscal requirements to reflect the federal assumption of respon- sibility for adult aids under HR 1 due to the lack of information and state legislation on implementation procedures and financial provisions. The State of California hasyet to adopt legislation which will specify the amount the counties will have to pay as supplementation to the basic federal grant and procedures for administration of the supplemental grant program. On the basis of information received to date, the formula used to determine county costs under HR 1 will not result in savings to counties. Budget revisions have been made to reflect the federal takeover of adult aids on January 1, 1974. Also, an appropriation of $1,615,000 is included to provide for county supplementation of HR 1 grants, the committee is of the opinion that under the circumstances this prudent approach should be followed. 3. An additional comehensive review was made of categorical aids to welfare recipients in view of the proposed substantial increase from the previous fiscal year of approximately 1.5 million dollars in county funds. It was noted that the largest increase in county money ($994,820) was in the General Assistance Program which is fully financed by county funds. The cost of this program under current board policies has grown to a total proposed county amount of $3,380,340. A reduction of $593,440 in General Assistance is recommended by the committee and the Human Resources Director is ordered to develop a revised 4. lic for consideration b the Board which will lor exD itures to the bu et =roRriat on recommended. The soaring cost of county aid in the form of General Assistance must be checked. 4. Proposed additional permanent positions were further reviewed; consequently an additional 19 R2sitions were deleted. The tots pox t ons originally requested by department heads of 824 has now been seduced Sb additional positions for staffing_juv ile facilities and work load growth. This . crease s approximately one per cent of the total number of county employees. In addition 48 positions are included for replacement of temporary positions and Public Employment Program employees who have been working full time; the Public Employment Program, a federal program, is being phased out in the 1973-1974 fiscal year. 5o a. Federal Revenue Sharing, a program of federal assistance to local-government over a five year period,_Wg not taken into consdera- tion in the Proposed Budget di to the uncertainties in financing the regular county budget and the largge number of requests made at the public hearings held whereby requests received totaled about 44 million dollars. The total amount of Federal Revenue Sharing funds received and anticipated for the 1973-1974 fiscal year is 15.7 million dollars, greatly under requests. After making the many budget reductions stated above and indicated in the attached detail, the county budget would remain unbalanced when applying the 1972-1973 rates to the 1973-1974 assessed valuation thereby requiring a tax rate increase. Inasmuch as this committee is firm in its decision that the eduction of RroWsed 2 expenditures and to finance General Fuad expenditures with the Revenue Sharing Fund. 5. It is obvious from the previous discussion of budget cuts in appropriations for welfare programs and services and the many other revisions specified on the attached sheets that the proposed county expenditurerogram has been significantly reduced. ghy, reductions would indeed be pai,� Ari ,Asut _ in a criuyling of traditional county services. It is apparent, therefore, that the reasonable and prudent course of action to follow would be to utilize Federal Revenue Sharing funds to close the financial gap in the General Fund. The utilization of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds to finance programs and departments which qualify under the federal priority expenditure categories will reduce the total property tax requirements thereby allowiag the tax rate to be established at about the same level as for the last fiscal year. The need of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds for this purpose was envisioned earlier when the Board determined not to allocate these funds until it had a clear picture of county budget requirements and the contemplated tax rate. The committee is aware that using Federal Revenue Sharing Funds to finance operating budgets may become a problem in future years should the revenue sharing program be curtailed or eliminated. Currently the Board appears to be left with no alternative. Further effort must be devoted .to long -range financial planning. Certainly, allocation of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds to establish or enrich programa (as originally envisioned by many) which usually require subsoquent fends for sustenance is not prudent in view of tax limitations imposed by SB 90. It is, therefore. recommended that Federal Revenue Sharing Funds in the asrouat of $4,611,015 be utilized to finance regular programs-which fall intote federal oriority ggpenditure categg esi&ich tr&&Ftionally have been funded by the General Fund through property tax levies. I i e,w �s '�y P a ' 6. b. An Accumulative Capital Outlay (ACO) fund was established in the 1970-1971 fiscal year to raise funds for a new county jail and other needed capital improvement projects. The plans for the new jail are currently being revised pursuant to the directives issued by the Board and it is estimated will be completed in 1974. It is recommended that with the avail- i ityyiofF�ederal Revenue Sharing funds about .57 million doltars be set aside for iiIl construction. With this i5biHEEM allocation it is nded that the 10 cent le for the ACO fund be el to for the- 1973-1974 fi 1 - sca year in order to get to the tote county tax rate. This fiscal procedure would provide more funds for this project than would have been available under the former procedure of a 10 cent levy (which would raise about 2 million dollars) and yet take some pressure off the tax rate by allowing a commensurate increase in the General Fund levy without increasing the total county rate. The balance in the Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund in the amount of $5,033,951 will be appropriated making a total available for this__ project of about 12.5 million o Iarss. Hope- fully, sufficient additional funds can be made available in the 1974-1975 fiscal year to make this project a reality as the steady rise of construction costs escalate the price of this facility over one million dollars each year there is a delay. c. The use of Federal Revenue Sharing funds must be allocate to specific gr or y ca - gories. schedule is attached �rhieh indicates. a sues7est ed distribution of these , essay of which have been removed from General Fund financi.n&. The committee is unanimous in its recommendation with an exception beinmade by Supervisor E. A. Linscheid to the 400,000--j' to assist in acquiring park lands adjacent to Mt. Diablo State Park and $50,000 to construct a new animal spay clinic. A decision should be made now or in the near future with funds set aside in the Federal Revenue Sharing Reserve for Contingencies so as to be available a~ some later date for expenditure. 7• 6. All matters requiring policy decision by the Board of Supervisors identified in the Budget Message have been reviewed and benefits attributed thereto evaluated against the cost involved. OnlX those- Policir items which ar economically a vantageous or coni eyed aecessary or highly desirable the attgehed schedule are recommended; this is not the year for new county programs. It is not intended that all R21igy items not included be considered as completely and finally rejected. In some specific instances the County Administrator has been requested o develo further information d the committee. The limited time afforded by the budget calendar precludes development of necessary supplemental informa- tion and hearing of the various points of view of all interested and involved parties; additional time is needed to afford the committee the-opportunity to completely evaluate complex proposals. As can readily be seen, the county budget for the 1973-1974 fiscal year presented particularly difficult problems for the committee. The financial crunch upon" the county arising €rom -cut-r. barks in federal and state revenues used in partnership programs; the erosion of budgets by soaring inflation and the need to" hold the line on the property tax rate creates a situation which .can' only be met through severe restrictions on goveze�t spending . and the use of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds. .It is abundantly clear that U those same forces continue unabatedly to apply pressure on the fiscal capability of local government and withh the legal restraints appl ed by 5B 90 that we are :on a collision course with a future financial crisis::.. . Afty. reduction in the amount of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds would) indeed be disastrous. The survival of local government asIA. partner in providing "publ.ic services requires that legijlat:ive relief be sought to remove the fiscal straightjacket we t.iiv are in. In the meantime a . officials responsible for the conduct of county government, it is imperative that all applications aiid proposaIs for federal and state financial assistance be very carefully evaluated as to the future county commitment required,. All requested new programs should be approved only after careful caasiderati.on of the financing required as it appears that there must be some offsetting reduction in existing program. w � � it is suggested that this report and detail be made 9 available to department heads and tlbe public and. that the Board members care{i?L ly review i-he recommendations included herein for further discussion and adopt-for. or.. August 30, 1973. A. EINS Supervisor District 4 Supervisor District 5 BUDGET ?,,EIrISIciq,- APPROPRIATIONS 1973-1974 Increase Decrease 1. Municipal Court Walnut. Creek-Danville Rent of Real Fropertv $30,000 Court Furnishings and Equipme-at12,971 2. Categorical Aid Progrziis (I\Tet.) a. Aid to Needy Aged 4251480 b. Ait9 d to Needy BliLd 439,600ce Aid to Potentia-11-y Self-Supporting Blind $569800 d. Aid to FamiUes :lith Dependent Children 5279992 e. Aid to Neely Ch.-'.ldren - BHI 40 f. Aid to Dj.-;abled 6 g. Gc-.,neral ASSiSteaCa 29v560 9t County Security Incc-me 1,615,000 3. Auditor-Co'n;ro-Iler a. Micro'ilm Readell-/Printer 21700 b. Cost Applied -90000 4Q Special Fiscal Servict.,s Profeirional, and Pe.*sonal Services 170,700 5. Treasu-.-ar-Ta.x Collect�.z Book'-.eeping Wachinre 60500 6. Other �lections. Various Accotm. ts 150,150 7. Equipw-,nt OperatI07, ev Diesel Dumf Trucks (20 ton) 120y000 Excavator 75vOOO b. Flood Coyitrf,l Eq7.iipment 79200 8. Builling Mainte'aance Tm oiary Sa—iries r 25p000 9. Ecc-.iom2;.c Deve?opmezit support Tou', sn: Bureat, 4,500 10. Central Service Fixed Asset,, 49,300 11. 7uilding Insleetc r Temporary Ealarles 15,000 • 2c Tncraase Decrease 12. Planning Department Pz:ofes::ional Sen,-Ic:es :;900 13. Health Department e. E:�r7_yy ai-?d Perio� ?c ifedi-cal Sc::-eeni:-►s, for E1 gible I�I-no?_s �� 296 r 000 b. Professional Fees 109800 c. Establish Medical J4•'z�rr�1 Unit, ��}y�g pp0 14. County Medicai Services Various Appropriazlons 93 000 15. Public Works Department a. Road Maintenar-ce 5009000 b. Roadt-Construrtion 250P00O c, tid to Cities '726,718 d. Road Construction 133v615 eo .Engineering and Admi.nistreticit 84,244 f. Colmty Flood Ccr..tro _ ,w Constiuct Drainage System 8 ?,865 16. Various Department's Equi_pmrm-ati 6v320 , 17. Sheril`f a. Twpora?y Salaries 7,6 '5 b. State Assessment 850 C. C?of ming Allowance 12 e 000 18. Human Resources Agency Office Expense 14,400 Cost Applied --1.�JP) 19. Retirement Administration a. Office Expense 500 b. iempora�;% Salaries 31000 20. District Attorney - Special Projects Control of Major off:endzrs Fri je--t 89v970 z error. F-ovided -21,970 21. Galifcraia ',Ieiica, z sSistza_we Progrzm Grants In Aid 2259000 31 Increase Decrease 22. Permanent Salaries - General Fund d $2,9679880 Permanent Salaries - Library Fund 101x906 FICA - General Fund 659634 FICA - Library t'F unci 50846 Retirement - General iAmd 28-19272 Retirement - Library Fund 8,956 Health insurance - General. Fund 131,787 Health Insurance - " ibra:,j 'F= d 5,gzd,a Health Insurance Reired General ?lurid 9,000 Health Insurance Ret.l.red Library Ftmd 1,000 Reserve for Contingencies � General. Fund $3v4559573 Reserve for Contingencies -- L-i braxy Fund 1231,6512 23. Various Departments New Permanent Salaries -- General 1,209,698 New Parasanent Salaries -- Library 79541 24. District Attorney -- Family Support Cost Appl ie•:? -200,000 25. Childrens Shl elter Professional_ Services 199,000 26. Pliant Acquisition Various Projects 1459000 27. Game Protection Special Departmental Expense 70175 28. Accumulative Capital Outlay Fund Building Construction 2,1169049 29. Federal. Revenue Sharing Various App:.oprlatious 1597002201 30. District Attorney Establish Goncord Office 319600 3?. Spet2w.a.al Grant Programs Continue Richmond Youth House 28,581. 32. Welfare General Assistance Supplements 66,000 4. Increase Decrease 33. Office of Emergency Services Medical Emergency Radio System $500310 Radio Facilities . Cost Applied -79810 34. Radio Facilities Countywide Communications Coordination 31,000 Radio Facilities Cost Applied -6,525 35. Various Departments Wage Benefits 565 36. General Assistance County Aid $477,000 37. Welfare Administration Various Accounts 21943,709 Total $22,742,838 $242010s202 Net Decrease '.$10267,1364 Deduct transfer of appropriations from General Fund to Federal Revenue Sharing Fund and also included in Item 29 resulting in duplication 41 611,015 Total Reduction $5,878,379 EXPLANATION 1. Amendment to agreement with CPS Investment Co. approved by the Board of Supervisors on August 7, 1973 provides for extension of the date for completion of the building which eliminates the need for the appropriation to cover the rental payments. 2. Appropriations to the categorical aid budgets must be revised to reflect the impact of the federal assumption of adult aids under HR 1; adjustments have been made to providee xpenditures through December 319 1973 only. A prudent approachhas been taken whereby the count share of these programs which would have been required if there had been no federal takeover is budgeted as County Supplemental Security Income. No county savings are anticipated from implementation of FIR-1. Other program budgets have been adjusted in accordance with the latest case load and cost in ormation. The net county cost has been decreased only $26,303. 3. a. This microfilm equipment was purchased in the 1972-1973 fiscal year due to failure of old unit. b. This increase is due to an adjustment made to the cost applied to the County Hospital, increasing the Accounting Systems Development and central account- ing systems. 4. A review of the work program for the 2973-1974 fiscal year reveals that a reduction of $170,700 in the additional funds requested is in order. 5. Parts ceamot be obtained from the current model which is over 20 years old and constantly breakingg down and In need of replacement as it is critical unit in the financial system. 6. An ap ropriation of $128,100 is required for conducting on November 6, 1973 the .special state election pursuant to the initiative measure and to provide for a deficiency in the proposed budget in the amount of $22,050. 7. a. New major heavy construction equipment consisting of a gradeall excavator and four 10 yard dui trucks is proposed to establish a unit for ditch cleaning and pavement failure repair operations. It is recommended that this work be performed with rented equipment or under contract rather than embark on this program which requires a large c€tpital investment to implement. 2. b. Additional Flood Control District equipment which is to be purchased by the Public Works Department hes been identified; an additional appropriation of $7,200 is required for a truck. 8. Inasmuch as the proposed additional permanent positions have been reduced, the temporary salaries appropriation must be increased to cover the work program in accordance with prior expenditure experience. 9. A review of the policy item indicates that financial support should be provided for the Tourism Bureau to promote facllities at the County Airport and environs in cooperation with Concord. it is proposed that financial assist initially be restricted to $750 per month for a 10 month period and arrangements be made through the Contra Costa County Development LOU.Associat 10. Fixed assets for proposed Driver Clerk position which has been deleted a, t be eliminated. 11. Additional temporary salaries in the amount of $14,000 are required to cover increased building activities in view of elimination of requestedpermanent positions. Work load to be reviewed in January, 1974 to determine effect of "tight money" situation. 12. This appropriation of $900 provides for continuation for three - months of the agreement with Mr. A. Burton to provide park and recreation co =Ing services. 13. a. This pro;j ec , is reenlired by M-I for minors who are membera of families eligible under Medi-Cal, and is designed to provide early screening diagnosis and treatment in order to prevent and correct disabilities of children. Revenues are estimated which will offset the cost of this program for the 1973-1974 fiscal year. b. Board of Supervisors Resolution Number 73/521 increased the fees for physician services; an additional $109,800 is required to cover the new rate schedule. CIS The proposals for implementation of an expanded employee safety program to meet requiremaats of OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Act) and self-insuring the.workmen°s compensation insurance program are currently under study and consideration. Until such study is completed and a plan for action determined, no a ropriations are to be provided to fund components of the programs. i i r 3. 14. After review of expenditure experience and comparison with budget appropriations, various adjustments are necessary to most operating requirements; the most substantial increase is required for marketing and implementation of the PHP. 15. a. Although the long, wet winter of the previous year adversely affected the condition of roads in various sections of the county, the restoration of pavement failures may be completed over several years as a part of the regular, on-going road maintenance program; additional funds have been provided for road maintenance. It does not appear necessary to authorize an additional special appropriation of $500,000 for pavement repair. b. A review of the sources of revenue used to finance roads in the budget process indicates that $1,222,000 is .being financed by other general fund revenue sources; this compares with $4689000 for the 1972-1973 fiscal year. It is proposed that the road program be reduced over a two year period to a level which will eliminate the need for any support from other general fund revenue sources. In order to accomplish this objective it is recommended that the road construction budget be reduced by $250 000 which will result in the net requirement of about 275,000 from other general fund revenue sources which is about $200,000 less than for the 1972-1973 fiscal year. C4, A number of appropriations from previous years for various Aid to Cities projects could not be encumbered during the 1972-1973 fiscalyear and be carried over; therefore, it is necessary that $7260718 be reappropriated to preserve the integrity of the $500,000 annual allocation. d. Various projects must be adjusted and others added in accordance with agreements with subdividers and other public agencies. The lactose• of appropriai tions for road projects is completely offset 7 additional road revenues. e. Additional engineering and administrative work will be required as a part of the Richmond Area Study and a proposed traffic safety computer pror84,244 m; the additional budgetary appropriation of is fully offset by revenue. !» . �:.,:� �.••.;> 4T ^ , ,:� x -. - -.+t. v-t.,. ass .��.. _ .. ;(_:-, .. .—f, .. . ,. - .... ... ... IN 21 4. f. The appropriation for the North Richmond Dra project must be reduced to reflect the work per ormed and the revenue received for the 1972-1973 €iseal year; this reduction is offset by a reduction in revenue in a like amount. 16. Appropriations in the total amount of $6,320 are necessary to provide for equipment in various departments to replace units stolen and broken down, revised operating requirements and known price increases. 17. a. On July 30, 1973 the Board of Supervisors approved an agreement with the East Bay Municipal Utility District to furnish reserve police officers to provide services within the San Pablo Recreation Area for the 1973 season. The district is to reimburse the county for the cost of services provided. b. A special assessment fee of 20 cents per licensed bicycle must be paid to the State of California, Department of Justice, to finance the automated Stolen Bicycle System, pursuant to SB 147. c. An additional appropriation of $12,000 is proposed to provide certain safety equipment for sworn r0ak.land rsonnel in. accordance with a recent court decisioa Police Officers Association vs. City of Oakland) and -__... opinion of the County Counsel. 18. The proposed budget did not make provision for rental of a Xerox machine formerly charged .to the Welfare Department. It is estimated that the-armual cost for use of this aqui t will be $14,400 with $2,400 charged to other budget ts. 19. a. Employee booklets which had bawl anticipated would be mailed in the..1972-1973 fiscal year were not sent until after July 1 thereby resulting in an unantici- pated expense in the 1973-1974 fiscal period. by In order to clear the backlog of fiscal year in the office it will be necessary to extend employment of atemporary accountant for about 3 months; an additional appropriation of $3,000 is required. 5. 20. On May 29, 1973 the Board of Supervisors authorized submittal of an application to the California Council. on Criminal Justice for a grant tolenient a project with the objective of identifying repeat or habitual offenders in burglary and other major crimes and to plan for their control by use and enforcement of probation conditions. This project will be developed jointly with the Richmond Police Department; revenues to be received include $66,500 in cash payments with $21 970 of in-kind matching contribution and $1,500 cash matcAing requirements. 21. Thepproposed appropriation for payment of the county liability. , to t9 State, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code, Section 14150, was based on an assessed valuation increase of 7.5 per cent a�325 lied to the 1972-1973 fiscal year liability. An additional .000 is required as the assessed valuation increased 11 per cent thereby increasing the liability of the county to $7,095,000. 22. Appropriations for permanent salaries and wage benefits amt be adjusted in accordance with the salary and wage benefit increases granted by the Board of Supervisors. Provision was made in the Reserves for anticipated increases which would be granted after agreement is reached in the meet and confer sessions. The amount remaining in the Rserve for Contingencies - General Fund is $1,944,427 and in the Reserve for Contingencies - Library Fund there is a balance of $62,848; this compares with $2,144,800 and $89,223 for these Reserves in 1972-1973. 23. Theproposed budget included financing in the amount of $2,048,909 for 307 new permanent positions. As a result of the committee budget review the number of new permanent positions has. been revised to 104 and the appropriation reduced to $831,670, a reduction of 203 positions and $1,2179239. Also, the requirements have been revised to reflect the new nage rates and cost of employee benefits. 24. It has been determined that services provided by the District Attorney in handling; welfare cases will be charged directly to . Welfare Administration. An appropriation is luclTuded in the, welfare budget to cover this charge, the offsetting entry credit in Applied Cost. 25. The Children Shelter budget unit increase of $19,006 is ac®qurd' . to provide for the revised estimate of the cost of educational. services furnished by the Superintendent of Schools. 6. 26. Appropriations for various plant acquisition projects have been revised in accordance with current plans based upon the latest information available; included are reductions for land acquisition and parkin lot development in the Martinez Civic Center in the amount of $120,000 and elimination of $25,000 for leasehold improvements for the Walnut Creek-Danville Municipal Court. 27. The budget for Game Protection is modified annually to appropri- ate all monies available in the Fish and Game Fund. The current estimate is that only $7,825 is available (including flues for the 1973-1974 fiscal year) in the fund; therefore, the budget is decreased $7,175 to the available funds. 28. This adjustment increases the budget appropriation to the amount which will be raised by the 10 cent levy. 29. All entire balance of the Federal Revenue Fund of $15,700,201 (both funds received and estimated revenue for the 1973-1974 fiscal year) is .included in the budget to wake the feacWs avail- able for expenditure. The recommended allocation of these funds is shown on a separate schedule. 30. The proposed establishment of a Concord Branch Office for the District Attorney (a funded policy item) has boon deleted as further study must be devoted to a more comprehensive approach . to providing space for county personnel providing services. JA- .,.1, the Concord and adjacent central county area. 31. The funding necessary for continuation of the Ricbmond Youth House after the expiration of the December 30, 1973 HEW grant has been deleted. The Probation Officer should actively pu rau+�.. refunding by HEW of this project;. if this effort fails otbtr' . .; .:.:.. sources of funding should be sought. If all such av+maaues `of funding prove fruitless, then the Probation officer gray tris�i to request county funding at that time. 32. The providing of general assistance .supplements for private '" rehabilitative group homes to- care for general assistance recipients suffering from mental disorders, drug abuse and alcoholism is a further .expansion of services which camot be. afforded in the 1973-1974 fiscal period. 33. This appropriation provides for the estimated cost of Phase I of the Medical Emergency Radio System designed to I=rbveemerggency medical .care capability ss it relates to traffic accidents. All costs are covered by a grant received from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety, 7. 34. This CCCJ Project Number 1370 to facilitate the transfer of information between law enforcement agenvies to most current needs. Revenue in the amount of $21,000 is anticipated from the State with the county contributing $10,000 of which $6,525 is in-kind services and $3,475 cash participation. 35. An adjustment is required for wage benefits to revised temporary salary requirements. 36. The continued rapid rise in General Assistance expenditures (proposed increase of $994,820) must be turned around; a reduction of $477,000 is recommended which will leave a total appropriation of county funds in the amount of $2,786,900 Which is still $451,820 more than allowed for the previous year. The Human Resources Director is to resent a revised general• assistance policy to the .County Administrator and the Board- of 'Supervisors designed to stem the rapid rise in the expendl- tures for this program, and to remain within the budget allowance. 37. The budget for welfare administration has been revised in accordance with the directive of the committee that expenditures for services are to be restricted to an amount which will be totally claimable under the federal ceiling. A comprehensive . review was wade by staff v&ich resulted in a number of modifications. A BUDGET REVISIONS REV. ?LAS 1973-1974 Increase Decrease 1. Categorical Aid Programs Federal Aid $51543s316 State Aid 4•, 086,569 2. Election Services State Initiative Measure $128,700 3. Medical Services Medical Screening for Eligible Minors 296,000 4. Public Works a. Road Revenues 133,61.5 b, Road Revenues 84,244 C. Federal Aid for Construction of North Richmond Drainage 840,865 5. Sheriff a. Police Services 7,675 6. District Attorney State Assistance 65,000 City of Richmond Contri'uution 19500 7. Planning Department Zoning Permits 50,000 8. District Attorney Consumer Fraud Penalties 1759000 9. District Attorney - Family Support State Aid (#6494) 1390000 10. County Medical Services Medi-Cal Fees 545,000 11. State Aid Traffic Safety Project 509310 12. State Aid Communications Coordination Project 211,000 13. Federal. Reverme Sharing Receipts 6,600,000 Federal Revenue Sharing Interest 350,000 20 Increase Decrease 14. Fish and Game Fines $10000 15. Welfare Administration Federal Aid 275689116 State Aid $334,465 Other Aid 200,000 Total $81841,909 $130378,866 Net Decrease $47536,957 e 0 REVFANLM 1. Adjustment of Federal and State financial assistance in accordance with revised categorical aid program budgets is required. 2. In accordance with the July 3, 1973 opinion of the Legislative Counsel, the State of California will be required to reimburse local government for the cost of statewide initiative measure election. 3. The cost of implementing the project for early and periodic medical screening for elligible minors (under Medi--Cal program) is to be fully reimbursed by Medi-Cal and federal grant funds. 4. a. Additional revenues to be received for road construction pursuant to various agreements. b. Additional revenues to be received for engineering services performed for the Richmond Area Study ($11,250) and the TOPICS program ($72,994) are hereby added with offsetting appropriations included to complete the work. c. A revenue decrease of $840,865 is required as this amount was received and appropriated in the 1972-1973 fiscal period. ` 5. Revenues are to be provided by MMUD for police services at the San Pablo Recreation Areas, pursuant to the agreement approved July 30, 1973. 6. Notification has been received from the CCCJ of approval of the grant for the Ma'or Offenders Project; this m4ect is to be inanced by $6500 grant from the CCCJ and00 cash contribution from the City of Richmond. 7. It is recommended that zoningpermit fees be increased and fees established for environmental impact reports effective about October 1, 1973; the total estimated additional revenue (making allowance for some reduction in building activity) for the 1973-1974 fiscal year is $50,000. 8. Additional revenue in the amount of $175,000 is anticipated as a result of intensified consumer fraud activities conducted .by the District: Attorney. 9. Revenue which had been budgeted for family support activities conducted by the District Attoraey must be modified to eliminate the amount to be received for handling welfare cases as the cost of these services will be charged to the Welfare Department and the revenue received incorporated in the welfare clafm and revenue. • 2. E 10. The anticipated revenue to be received from Medi-Cal billings has been increased based upon 1972-1973 revenue experience and anticipated increased fees. 11. The State of California has granted the cozmty $50,310 to establish a Medical Emergency Radio System (MEDARS) to provide for local central dispatch/control and hospital to ambulance communications. 12. Revenue in the amount of $21,000 is to be received from the state for CCCJ project 1370 which is for a countywide communica- tions coordination project to transfer information between law enforcement agencies. 13. Receipt of Federal Revenue Sharing Funds in the total amount of $6,600,000 and interest earned in the amount of $350,000 is anticipated for the 1973-1974 fiscal. year. 14. The revenue to be received from fish and game fines has been reduced $1.,000 in accordance with prior experience which indicates that the total revenue from this source should be about $7,000, rather than the $8,000 in the -Proposed Budget. 15. Social Service Department budget and revenues have been revised in accordance with the ceiling established for federal reimburse- ment to the county for welfare services. i,5 -Wtt 77.r r ALLOCATION OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUND Public Safety Sheri-Z`oro'-ner $198960991 Environmental Protection Complete PMse IT - Nater Quality Study $400,000 Contribution to Bay Area Sewer Service Agency 84,606 484,606 Public Trans ortation Finance Aid to cities Road Program 1,226,718 Recreation Acquire arc ands Adjacent to Mt. Diablo State Park 400,000 Libraries Replace oo ®o bi1e 40,000 Capital EXPenditures Remodel dor superior CouFt 5009000 Land Acquisition - Civic Center 150,000 Remodel Finance Building 65,000 Incinerator Air Scrubber 15,700 Euthanasia Facilities 167,000 Hospital Electrical Corrections 2509000 Construct New Corporation Yard 50,000 Construct Animal Spay Clinic 50,000 Construct New Jail 7y500000 8,7479700 Reserve for Contigencies Maintain reserve for possible liabilities arising from implementation of Homemaker Program and additional county supplementation of HR-1. ,29904_86 Total Available 15 700 201 i F .47 7 ADDITIONAL POSITIONS RECOM-1ENDED 1973-19.74 Fiscal Year f i i Budget Salary Unit Department Number Classification Date Cost 010 Auditor- 1* Account Clerk II 10-1-73 $ 6,705 Controller 2* Account Clerk 1 10-1-73 12,571 3 9,276 011 Data 1 Data Processing Processing Shift Supervisor 10-1. 73 $ 9,635 1* Account Clerk I 10-1--73 6,286 1 Equipment Operator II 10-1-73 7,198 23,11-9 015 Treasurer-Tax 1 Account Clerk I 10-1-73 $ 6,286 Collector 2 Typist Clerk 10-1-73 11,165 T $ 17,491 016 Assessor 1* Stenographer Clerk 10-1-73 $ 5,993 4* Typist Clerk 10-1-73 22,331 1* Intermediate Typist Clerk (PI) 10-1-73 3,445 2 Auditor- Appraiser 10-1-73 21,707 8 53,476 035 Civil Service 2 Typist Clerk 10-1-73 $ 11,165 1 Administrative Analyst 10-1-73 8,963 $ 20J29- 065 Martinez 2* Operating Administration Engineer 10•-1-73 $ 21,576 Buildings 1 Custodian II 2-1-74 30,917 1 Custodian I 2-1-74 30,478 4 28,9717 079 Building 2* Electricians 10-1-73 $ 27,097 Maintenance 3* Steamfitters 10-1-73 46,956 1* Draftsman- Estimator 10-1-73 11,873 6 85,929' 149 Central Service 1 Duplicating Lachine Operator 10-1-73 $ 6,747 1 Duplicating Services Clerk 10-1-73 5,718 $ 12,4697 2. Budget Salary Unit Department Number Classification Date Cost 210 Mt. Diablo 1* Chief Deputy Clerk 10-1-73 $ 11,407 Municipal Court 1* Deputy Clerk I 10-1-73 5,583 2 6,990 212 Richmond 1* Deputy Clerk I 10-1-73 $ 5,583 Municipal Court 245 District 2 Departmental Attorney-Family Collections Support Assistant 10-1-73 $ 14,822 1 Departmental Collections � Assistant 2-1-74 T78 f 830 255 Sheriff 1 Deputy Sheriff 9-1-73 $ 10,355 256 Sheriff's 1* Sheriff's Communications Dispatcher 10-1-73 $ 7,724 300 County Jail 4* Deputy Sheriff- Female 10-1-73 $ 42,258 1* Sheriff's Service Assistant 10-1-73 8,805 5 "11,063 63 308 Probation 3 Deputy Probation Officer 10-1-73 $ 31,797 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk 10-1-73 6,358 314 Juvenile Hall 8* Group Counsellor II 10-1-73 $ 68,763 1 Institutional Supervisor II 10-1-73 12,165 9 80,928 320 Preplacement 3 Institutional Program Supervisor I 10-1-73 $ 31,864 7 Group Counsellor II 10-1-73 60,167 1 Intermediate Typist Clerk 10-1-73 6,358 11 "8,,389 I 3. Budget Salary Unit Department Number Classification Date Cost 321 Girls Center 5 Group Counsellor II 10-1-73 $ 42,976 1 Driver Clerk 10-1-73 7,240 6 T 50,216 357 Planning 2 Assistant Director of Planning 10-1-73 $ 35,310 1* Typist Clerk 10-1-73 5 583 359 Coroner 5 Coroner's Aide 1-1-74 $ 21,470 366 Animal Control 2 Animal Control Officer 10-1-73 $ 15,635 � ��Kennelman 3-1-74 j�90 540 County 4* Intermediate Hospital Typist Clerk 10-1-73 $ 25,428 1* Clerk III 10-1-73 7,198 1* Special Qualifi- cation Worker 10-1-73 5,553 1* Utility Worker 10-1-73 6,664 2* Typist Clerk 10-1-73 11,165 1* Licensed Psychiatric Technician 10-1-73 51993 1* Staff Nurse I 10-1-73 80,818 11 70,81 577 Crippled 1 Supervising Children Cerebral Palsy Services Therapist 10-1-73 $ 10,916 22 Therapist Aide 10-1-73 123r190 620 County Library 1 Librarian II 1-1-74 $ 61432 1 Librarian I 2-1-74 4,765 3 Library Clerk 2-1-74 2,966 j16 TOTAL 104 $831,670 *Replacement of Temporary and PSP Positions 48 396,941 Additional Positions 56 $4341729 j 9. �.. w r -. .,.^ <'Sf,�-Y .- '` ' � �'S'".r.�J4 •'-c.- a wt .. ' ,:'w A'"-'JX".=. .+:t�.... Y. .. ... ,.,� r ,. n ..-, rn+. .#.h.e r r - SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL PERMANENT POSITIONS 1973-1974 Fiscal Year Replace Temporary Cost Budget N._...--umb� or PEP 199.27 r 276 vit �n�tment 3 Auditor-Controller 3 010 3 1 23,119 _ 01i Data Processing 015 Treasurer-Taac 3 17,451 Collector 6 53,476 8 016 Assessor 3 1 20,128 035 Civil Service Martinez Administra- 4 2 28,971 065 tion Building$ 6 85,926 Building Maintenance 6 079 2 1 12,465 199 Central Service Municipal 2 16,990 210 Mt. Diablo 2 Court 212 Richmond Municipal 1 1 5,583 Court 295 District Attorney - 3 .. 1.8,830 Fami1Y Support 10,355 1 255 Sheriff 256 1 1 7'724 Sheriff's Communications 5 51,063 5 300 Sail 4 _ 381155 308 Probation 80,928 9 314 Juvenile Sall 8 98,389 Preplacement Program 11 320 _ 50,216 6 321 Girls Center 3 1 40,893 357 planning I i 2 e 359 Coroner 5 - 21,470 366 Animal Control 4 22,090 540 County Hospital 11 11 70,819 577 Crippled Children 3 - 23,190 620 County Library 3 - 14,163 TOTAL 104 48 $831,670 Less - Replacement of Temporary and PEP Positions 48 396,941 MEW Actual Additional 56 $434,729 POLICY MATTERS RECOIT ENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COIKMITTEE Summarized below are those policy matters which are specifi- cally recommended by the Administration and Finance Committee. Budget Unit and Item Amount County Assessor Implement Direct Billing Personel Property Assessment Program $239681 Economic Development Provide Financial Support for Tourism Bureau 79500 Sheriff Continuation of Concentrated Burglary Suppression Program 102,760 Sewage, Waste and Water Finance Apportionment of Bay Area Sewage Services Agency 84,606(1 Social Service Emergency Foster Homes 20,000 Aid to Needy Children - BHI Foster Home Rate Increase 399120 General Relief Foster Home Rate Increase 11,800 County Library A_dd=ti ona? Boc!=, oblle Jnyt 40tOOO(13 Animal Control Construct Spay Clinic 509._(1) Total $3699467 All other policy matters identified in the Budget Message were considered and of necessity must be denied. The items presented included many desirable public services and programs; however, the property tax situation currently faced precludes the financing required for their implementation. (1) Appropriations to be financed from Federal Revenue Sharing Fund - Total Amount $174p606. e v _ w. I � PAASCH CL=RK 130ARD C7 c_uPERVISORS August 27, 1973 corvT�n COSTA CD. Deputy Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Dear Sr: Since I cannot attend your budget session in pHrson because I have to worm during the daytime for a--living., I want to take this moans of protesting any budget proposal that will invole any raise n the tax rate. It seems to me it wodld be more appropriate to lower the tax rate since the recent huge reassessments in the ecunty of 38-E0°'. This reassessment alone will produce at least a 15�. jump in revenue without raising the tax rate according to chief appraiser Carl Rush. i5" is a lot of money. My hourly wage is limited to 5,5% and that hasn't been approved by the Pay Board yet. Yy horse in Concord was reappraised 3 ,years ago for an increase of $4600.00. This year they hit me again for a $4320.00 increase, which more than wiped out the recent $1,00.00 increase in exemption. Where is the so-called property tax relief? Don't "pass the buck" on tax relief to Sacramento or Washington. You are the ones who spend the money and control the purse strings in Contra Costa County, so do like we ta:.payers that are limited by the Pay hoard have to do, live within a limited budget. Don't have the attitude that the taxpayer is an unlimited source of revenue. Other taxing districts in the County are cutting their tax rate, how about you doing the s�1me? Cordially, UN Vernon E. Gunnels Sr 1754 Elm Road Concord, Cal. -ti t � F g 3 =a ' r "C EIV 3../D i WU MRRTIE2 ? ` 150P OLA169(1549) (2-151144EZ'40)PD 08/28/73: 1549 ICS IPMRNCZ:."CSP . ; _ . ,•` ttLv _ 7147290592,:-TDRN CARLSBAD-`.,CA:i27 08-29-0349P EST W. T. A :,N PA ; FMS WARREN BOGGESS BQARD OF SUPERVISORS DLR CLE RhC ARD OF sua_ilviso" 'COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BLDG;; - yam+ cosra.cu 'tARTINEZ Ck'94553 BY WE NEEIl: A LI:'XTHE DAY CARE,:WE= CAN GET-..DIRECT SER VICE TO CLIENTS r w ,�;REALLY IS - CHEAPER -THAN INDIRECT SERVICE. THANKSFOR ALL YOUR _yHELP IN THE=-PA`ST,. �` h t: 3 e, FRAN DA VLDSONDI RECTOR�RODEO CHILD DEVELOPMENT,`'CENTER 4 ��"'' •+. mss' ���L� 7-. d , _ E f Au ^ Fr.'. -� �� 1i � �. x. an y t 'WU MARTINS 152P - � yr, 1Cyt • ,.,xi : ; ~`�'. X F OLA 1,70 1 ) C2�1 S12A 3E�40)PD 08/28/73-1551 riUJ Ma CICS IPMRNC CSPx f' 7147290592 TD8N"CAR A 27. 0$-28�035iPtEST:, -: W':T``PAASC,l . CLERK ARD. -SU?ERV{SONS a FFMS ALFR ZIkn IAS ,BOARD -4F *SUPERVISORS ,,DLR c ;R�.c rA co. c: 'Q?UNTY.-ADMINIS.TRATIQN •BLD& n ,_ , ', fir - �r _ a.oucx ?` i l"ARTINEZ. CA 94553 c :CONTINUE-'F-lG-MING FOR OUIL`•DAY CARE CENTERS OUR COMMUNITY- NEEDS. " THE SER.VICE�AND�WI_LL VERY-"'-MUCH APP&ECIATE YOUR HELP rx•. t FRAN DA:VIIISCINDIRECTOR-YRODEO 'CHILIl�DEVELOFMENT'•CENTER � i.J• ti �T M ,y ,K ,^t .h..yr{ \�; f.� n'SY r, •,"�. .. W 't�T' _"S...r� :.:�-. i... .� ..y •�.ay,.,p S tr ��1".':- _ ;^.5;,.X, r�... +yrxa ,c. _ - .J,, *,-„''y"_' �a�,.st..” '. rtl"1,- }I,.. :+ts. tom.*'- .. )i_r-'.". a�l1"al+Zh-'�:^: - .. -. - t: N, •r�- r• � K- � 4 r' -T v •,�t#i .T kC?""'+Y L',S�n,.k t`;.A4. "nos Ayf•' tt' 'S 4" J- "• 1, F4`-i:. �•'- Y - r ��. b. -A i ..r' 1 +A(S" �.��k � '-'�„ �;i �.. ,i. .+ `!r 1 � r.r y 'rl�i Ys �`'�r ��::�� co VU MARTINS -�� i. Vii;; "t:r+EI -ED ap Af(( UG Z OLB174t154-51: 2-150952E240}PD 08/28/73 1545 - E t ICS IPMRNCE!!CSP. �. 7147290592�SDRN CARLSBAD-;-CA 29 48-28 0345P EST CLERK wBOA-RD g FMS JAMES.KENNY•-BOARD ,OF7SUF:7RVIS­ORS DLR � "'RA"OS-_Ar=1 � COUNTY-ADMINISTRATION BLDG`;`: M4RTINF_2:•CA•`,94553 2 PLEASE RECONSIDER DAY 'CARE"CONTRACTS KEEPIX MOTHERS AND CHILDREN (FF WELFARE-IS CHEAPER THAN MAINTAINING THEM ON GRANTS WE HAVE trDRE THAN':,JUSTIFIED OUR PAST EXPENSES IN WELFARE SAVINGS FRAN DAVIDSONDIRECTOR RODEO CHILD- .DEVELOPMENT CENTER _ - ...:'+v'. .3 G.. .. .. r}r5 h*,.+:+ �; � .l Vi.µ i _:t; f -• - OPEC. 5 /. MARTIN E. ROTHENBERG JUDGE. OEPA RTMENT 7 j5tafi n£ daidm_dm �A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA yV. 1 u .. rc"' J COURT HOUSE, MARTINEZ T, A �7%, t� -R•,tSCR3 GON--R,q CQ3�A C�. August 27, 1973 „:y ..._CI Comity L/ U Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) Board of Supervisors Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 Re: Conciliation Court Gent letnen: In the absence of Judge Robert Cooney, and as the Acting Domestic Relations and Conciliation Court Judge, I wish to correct a misunderstanding contained in Mr. McBrien's memorandum of August 20, 1973, con- cerning the Conciliation Court. It should be noted that one of the objectives of the Superior Court Judges in proposing transfer of the Conciliation Court to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court is not to provide for expansion of the service, but is to provide for curtailment and reduction of the service. Yours very truly, MARTIN E. ROT BERG, JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR URT bER:wl1 CC: Judge William R. Channell, Presiding Judge Judge Robert Cooney C. L. Van Marter R. E. Jornlin J. P. McBrien Doris Treisman i I �i umar, Resources r.aency CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date August 27, 1973 To J . P.PIN County Administrator R � a..� f t F �' ups Y i-jD Fr0111 R. E. Director1Y, / y7.3 "1„^, SCH CLZRK POARD QF SUPERVISORS Subj STAFFICAL SERVICES ELIGIBILITY DIVISION CONTPkA COSTA CO. Ey _.._------_l..L....... Deputy References: (a) Memo to H. D. Funk from R. E. Jornl in, dated July 20, 1973, subject, Staffing of Financial Clearance Unit (b) Memo to J . P. McBrien from R. E. Jornlin, dated August 14, 1973, subject, Staffing for CHAS Credit Section The above cited references outlined the difficulties that would result by inadequately staffing the Medical Services Eligibility Division. Those difficulties predicted an increasing backlog. Currently the Medical Services Eligibility Division is operating with 12 personnel absent. Some of these personnel are on leave, others have been assigned to the CHAS Credit Section and one is out sick. As a result of this situation and an 'inadequate current staff, the remainder of the working staff is unable to keep up with the volume of work. Even when all of the current staff is seeing patients and maintaining the paper flow, there is a slow accumulation of backlog. The situation at the moment is that the staff is overwhelmed. As a consequence, I have issued orders to those units to do the best they can by arranging their work in priority fashion and doing the most critical work first. The remainder of the work will either be picked up in the distant future by costly overtime or simply will be forgotten. I can do no more than what I have done to this point in time in shifting personnel , permitting overtime and generally outlining the problems that will result with inadequate staffing. As the situation currently stands, I see no viable alternative for me other than that noted above. It should be specifically pointed out that without adequate staff for the Medical Services Eligibility Division, this county will suffer a loss in its ability to claim for Medi-Cal and from other revenue sources. Moreover, the cost of administering the Medi-Cal program, which constitutes over 40% of the Medical Services Eligibility Workers' activity, is 100% reimbursable to the county (50% federal funds and 50% state funds) . In addition, 90% of eligi- bility determination services for Short/Doyle are potentially reimbursable to the county. Thus, it is obviously contrary to the best interests or the county to suffer revenue losses simply by failure to provide adequata =--off to the Medical Services Eligibility Division. In the light of this situation, if you feel there is something I have overlooked or there is some significant help that can be offered, I would be most anxious to hear it and follow up. - ., e AIL 1 J. P. McBrien -2- August 27, 1973 In summary, I have stressed the importance of maintaining adequate staffing based on the work measurement study; and further, I have stressed the diffi- culties that would arise by temporarily staffing the CHAS Credit Section with Eligibility Workers. We have also recognized the importance of the CHAS effort and their urgent need to replace the EW's with clerical personnel they can train and retain. Therefore, any solution to the problem of Medical Services Eligibility Division must also provide for the CHAS Credit Section. No effective resolution for these problems has been provided. As a conse- quence, I must request your policy guidance regarding the method of operation you suggest I pursue. REJ:mc cc: H. D. Funk, Auditor-Controller --'� Administration and Finance Committee . ,gp � a z �•-k. . .. e.__ r . . ... ,. a ..>.. _ _ :7 .. r .r...,, .. ,.,<.... _.,. ._..9,. i 1� � iaum a n Resouz ccs e,(enqNEW . I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date July 20, 1973 To H. Donald Funk, Auditor-Controller F} m R. E. J Pnlin. Director . Subj STAFFIN/Q FIPlANCIAL CLEARA14CE UNIT Reference: Your memorandum dated July 16, 1973, same subject The desirability of having the required classified clerical positions in the CHAS Financial Clearance Unit on board by the end of August is unquestionable. However, the practical problem remains the lack of vacant positions available to transfer at this time. As you know, we had hoped to have these positions available from an early allocation to Medical Services Eligibility Division which we requested from the Board of Supervisors , but this request was denied despite full support from the County Administrator. The basis of our request for early allocation of personnel to Medical Services Eligibility Division was a comprehensive work measurement study conducted during April 1973. This study indicated a requirement for 49 EW positions, in lieu of the current authorization of 37.5, and_Lclerical positions in lieu of the current authorization of 17 permanent and 6 temporary positions. Due to the fact that the Eligibility Division has been understaffed, a sub- stantial backlog had accumulated necessitating the expenditure of 3,106 hours of EW and Clerical overtime between February 9, 1973, and April 30, 1973, to reduce it. :t was hoped, therefore, that by the early allocation of the additional required positions, the build-up of another backlog could be avoided. Since the early allocation was not forthcoming, backlog began to accumulate again during the month of May. The rate of accumulation from May 1 , 1973, to the present has been approxi- mately . Medi-Cal applications and 176 Billing Instructions per month. On July 1 , 1973, these figures stood at 247 Medi-Cal applications and 1 ,037 Billing Instructions (pending over 30 days) . Projecting these accumulations forward to October 1 , 1973, we can anticipate backlogs of at least 448 Mledi- Cal applications and 1 ,565 Billing Instructions if we are unable to obtain the required staffing. Moreover, the postponement of returning the EW's now temporarily assigned to the CHAS Unit will further contribute to backlog accumulation. At this rate, the Eligibility Division will be again in the same untenable position on January 1 , 1974, as they were on January 1 , 1973, and costly overtime will be required again to reduce an unacceptable backlog accumulation. Even though EW's have not been performing reception/intake duties since formation of the Financial Clearance Unit on July 5, 1973, backlog has -- 'J•.�J�..^�•i�r'jr._C�...i�-.:+�'.-1-i �:-.:..�►: i 11��� ......' C .� are J vacant. Aside frolm the adverse roraie tactors, the consequences or ba.-kicg accumulation in the Eligibility Division cause a chain reaction. It slo:•rs do:.n the routine work in the Hospital Business Office because billings are not sent out in a timely manner and this jeopardizes our Medi-Cal --ollections. By providing to the CHAS Unit 4 newly assigned EW's (3 scheduled for vacancies in the Eligibility Division and 1 for a vacancy in the Social Service Department) and 2 temporary TC's from the Eligibility Division, it was possible to commence training on July 5, 1973, as requested by Mr. Hawn. However, the loss to the Eligibility Division of the 2 temporary TC's also has had some adverse impact since these two personnel (who performed their duties on the 12:00 midnight to 8:00 a.m. shift) were able to also perform other clerical stork when not actually receiving clients. The clerical duties they performed (ad-nit and non-admit procedures and processing returned invoices) averages out at about 83 manhours per month or roughly one-half of one clerk equivalent. This means that these duties now have to be performed by other clerical personnel in the Eligibility Division who are already fully employed, thereby further contributing to backlog accumulation. As indicated in previous correspondence and verbal communications , as long as personnel were provided who could perform the financial clearance function, the situation could be tolerated until permanent positions become available. Further, the County Administrator has authorized temporary clerical staffing of the CHAS Unit in order to avoid further aggravating the backlog accumulation situation in the Eligibility Division and , as indicated above, causing a slow down of work in the Hospital Business Office. n 'Faced with the problems developing from a denial of our early allocation request, as cited above, our plan is to start in the near future transferring into the CHAS Unit temporary TC/ITC's on a scheduled basis so that appropriate training and competence can be maintained. In this manner, the requirements of CHAS are fulfilled pending the allocation of permanent positions and the essential work of both the Eligibility Division and the Hospital Business Office are not disrupted or reduced to the point where a massive and expensive backlog is again accumulated. REJ:mc cc: J. P. McBrien, County Administrator A. Croutch, Assistant to Director, Management Affairs Humour Resoulu crzrn;-y COI�c'r�'T?A COSTA COUi�TTY Date August 14, 1973 To J . P. McBrien, County Administrator Attention Tom Vie 1 ch, Supervising Management Analyst From R. E. Jorn I i rfl; Di rector , SUbj STAFFING FOR CHAS CREDIT SECTION Reference: a. Memo to R. E. JornIin f rom J . P. McBrien, dated August 6, subject - Request for Four ITC's. b. Memo to J . P. McBrien from R. E. Jornl in and D. J . Ludwig, dated July 31, subject - Request for Four ITC's. c. Memo to H. D. Funk from R. E. Jornlin, dated July 20, subject - Staffing of Financial Clearance Unit This memorandum is in response to reference a. In order to clarify and exp I a i n the problems encountered in seek i ng to staff the CHAS Credit S=v,I-i nn at the County Hospital , it is necessary to review the general sequence c.f- events over the past three months. Your attention is invited to the ouTline below which highlights the situation with respect to both the CHAS Cretin Section and the M led i ca I Services Eligibility Division. We would I :ice ;,I�;et a with you as soon as possible after you have received�h i s rierrorandur� CHAS Credit Section The original recommendation provided for establishment of this activity with twelve ( 12) positions: six (6) to be transferred from the Medical Services Eligibility Division; three (3) from Medical Services Reception Unit; and three (3) new positions to be created. It is planned for the CHAS Credit Section to be supervised by the Medical Services Reception Supervisor. Because our request for early allocation of positions to Medical Services Eligibility Division was denied, it was not possible to transfer in the six (6) positions required for this unit in early July without seriously deplet- ing an activity already functioning with insufficient staff. Therefore, in order to enable the CHAS Unit to commence training on July 5, a decision was made to temporarily assign to the CHAS Unit four (4) newly assigned Et'l's and two (2) limited term clerks from the Eligibility Division. It was clearly understood and agreed that this arrancement would be temporary pending Establishment of permanent TC/ITC positions for the CHAS Unit. Because of tha increasing need during July in the Eligibility Division for return of their E'„'s to fill existing vacancies, the County Administrator's Office authorized the replacement of these personnel with temporary TC/ITC's. Hence, -the memorandum (reference b. ) of July 31 . At the present time the CHAS Unit is operating with four (4) EW's, two (2) limited term clerks from the El igibi I ity Division ^-d three (3) frcr-, IN-le Fo3pi .-ul nec�_zDLicn -2- Unit. This is an unsatisfactory situation from the standpoint of both the CHAS Unit (which urgently needs to train the clerks they will retain) and Medical Services Eligibility Division (which urgently needs the return of EW's to fill existing vacancies in current staff) . Medical Services Eligibility Division During the month of April , a comprehensive work measurement study of this activity was conducted. The results of the study indicated a requirement for 49 EW's, in lieu of current staff of 37.5 and 27 clerks in lieu of current staff of 23 (6 clerks being limited term) . This study was presented to the County Administrator's Office on May 25, with a recommendation for addition of two (2) EW Sup I 's, total personnel requirement of 17 ( 11 EW's, 4 clerks, . 2 EW Sup 1 's) . Subsequently, the County Administrator's Office supported our request to the Board of Supervisors for early allocation of these personnel in order to provide the capability for avoiding another backlog build-up and to provide positions for transfer to the CHAS Unit. At a meeting with CHAS representative, Mr. Hawn, and Chief, Medical Services Eligibility Division on May 31 , it was determined from the work measurement study (Reception/Intake Procedure = 1 ,086 manhours/month) that about 1 ,000 manhours equivalent per month would be taken over by the CHAS Unit. This amounted to an estimated work equivalent of five (5) EW's and one ( 1 ) clerk This formed the basis for planning the transfer of six (6) positions from the Eligibility Division to the CHAS Unit. However, it was emphasized that this could not be done from the currently insufficient staff of the Eligibility { Division without seriously jeopardizing their ability to accomplish their mission. Even with the transfer of approximately 1 ,000 manhours equivalent of work to the CHAS Unit, the Eligibility Division would still need six (6) additional EW's and three (3) additional clerks to have sufficient staff to accomplish the workload and avoid the accumulation of backlog. With denial of our request for early allocation of personnel and the temporary transfer of six (6) personnel from the Eligibility Division to the CHAS Unit, the Eligibility Division has been operating since July 5 with authorized staffing of 33.5 EW's and 21 clerical personnel . Actual staffing has been considerably less (average of about 30 EW's and 19 clerks) due to absences for normal summer leave. This condition has been still further aggravated by the necessity to shift temporarily three (3) EW's to other locations to insure coverage. This is a costly action because mileage must be paid daily between Richmond-Martinez-Pittsburg. This situation has also led inevitably to another accumulation of backlog. As of August I , the backlog stood at 277 Medi-Cat Applications and 830 CMSE-1 's. The continuation of this situation is most unsatisfactory since backlog the Eligibility Division causes incorrect billings to be sent out from the Hospital Business Office, which in turn, jeopardizes our 'Vedi-Cal collections. Finally, there is the additional cost of overtime to reduce backlog or simply keep it down to a manageable level . Accordingly, considering the background out l i red a e, , o gens i der it mar.datory '~'' to return the four (+) c7i's from -"'-ee,e �- � it -;. ci icibi { ity Division at a 9 f -3- the earliest possible time. It is further necessary to staff the CHAS Unit �. with personnel who can be retained if CHAS is to succeed and is to remain on schedule. Beyond these immediate requirements, it is urgently requested that you again support our request for the additional personnel needed by the Eligibility Division in order to permanently staff these two essential activities with sufficient personnel to accomplish their respective missions. REJ:mc cc: A. Croutch, Assistant to Director, Management Affairs H. D. Funk, Auditor-Controller Attachments ti . r, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ASSOCIATION FOR THE MENTALLY RETARDED 2717 NORTH MAIN STREET - WALNUT CREEK. CA 94596 (4 15) 933-1544 FIR EST DENT �, "^� jVED F.t,11F R C)L.W 1 t5.'�N VICEPRESIDENTS August 24, 1973 '' A � Lt::.ru.Rn YacogzvrvsKl € .4 �'jr173 J11 TURNER f J TREASURER r W. T. P A A S C H �.:I.',:_i•+ F VLF J:i C3 E ����i( Q. SEC RE TAgV IARC OF SUPH}�YISORS ra Rz,E1.lb•u:C rr+LCILE MAN CONTRA COSTA CO. BOAgD OF DIRECTons cy _/1 L1.'. °I,E,F-RT r.GEY Board of Supervisors --- 4!R5.r +11_IE.UINGWA:V.4 LL n,la s.n,:.;+v Lou nlxoN P.Q. Box 911 I, 'NL:TL.t.LLIS ROBE RT LU'NL Martinez, California 94553 III_Put r.ART IN r.t R7..i:Vf:PARK. 1t5 "'n"L ""'"L Attn; Mrs. Geraldine Russell ALF R[r ::crILE51NCCR !F:��r.tA Rv soot.RI Mk- !-,'4.T TL)PP0LOTo n�FS� suE-.ST oc KmaN F,>:FliT IF T'.VL R iZ Dear Sirs: .!RS %'.L I Nt-':lf)FSY i.�LL i-.K Il.'.:RALSTAIJ PAST PRLSIDENTS LL LI`, 1411.1912 T 1.KC'�•+1',;>r.!n'r,i�'(i 7vo919;0 "1>M"ITE',"''_ 1967 1" I`:,J/.I+P11, 1IRepresentatives of our Association will attend the hearing of the IIAI . 66•. F.Gb EXLCUTIVC DIRECTOR Board on Tuesday, August 28 at 9;30a.m. , to demonstrate their L:. H ':AETI,11.4!IUtllor:L concern for the future of C.C.C.A.M.R. 's three workshop programs LYNN DAY TREATMENT CE.NTCR for the adult retarded. i—k—I �f;HOI:I_CHILDREN 20' f RC NTSTt1EET It.Lt 94526 Spokesmen will be available to answer questions concerning our ,11'0 831 r.`•34 "1KSHOP 17 TS RST 10T"STREET agency's application for Revenue Sharing Funds. .ITT SD LI-G. 94565 1 415)432 2323 RI CHMONO WORKSHOP 714 SQUIH 13TH ST 14E LT RI(:Hnl ONO 94804 (415)23:' 0566 WALNUT CREEK WORKSHOP 110 Sincerely, 2.`.f n�'ENVC SOj T I, , �2 S 4998 . GEGE nR 4 ROAD CENTER R ,...1_N'J! +'REEK '74596 Eliza eth D. Middione VFi.VE VILLAGE THRIFT STORE ,1„:1701-LN0,BEL1 Executive Director iORL.1415)232 207Z 11.111[ /41•.7 914 :143 MCMEIER r,,:,1(:. s,:)(:+FTI„N EDM;pjm 1 in”LT;.R D r_rl C'i1 L DR EN LnL.li-.)!:i:1:a4 SCi L.I TION H L,FiE TA RUELD D I INTEI:r::.l ICl'i nl_� LIF TION �j`�•/_ • OF gE.,IAF11t IT,' ,(--.�;•5-„CILITi ES K/ CALL'-:' :,nsSOCIn,1ON C;E Rt•+i::,Il I:.:;14'�'.'f.1 i:IL ITI LS r ./A 01= F:;r,r:R„_::..T.t�'iF.�:l'"1T�CS .1� :-1rFr- V f�:+'r.`.f✓.J� J t;N.r: t ,�. II�II� ���� } ^4.�,w- a..a. •' Es se i f Z Pe s " 77 i�5 •� t .,7 -1orih Imo_ s140i R .HOLLIS Clay Editor hAcirning News-Gai" s MARTINEZ A speciil,,pubhe sstaxXa;tirevievri. committee ":hes recomm ndsd tt�s# ttte silOrms rof county Supt�rvisors be mcreiseei fio �1�,7� ps�r�X!i or 3112 � r month. Tl�°supervisors P yt. ceive SI X00:per month or ;13,ZOO:p,er'Xir. Th cors=;, mitt*• -wthiek vrss urrieiir. PL:-'aEll►ii I Ilam P Blc�rerty* . vici presie�in#ef� 1. t�i C+�= soClationr ,41, e _ * twfei'Mdid "tier tiN'� , ., rens* ifs resin text= rauMy-widt ` ; #tion:Tlii .would he 6,when Gov. Ronald kra gan's tax reform mes-. ' sure is'brfore vaM� '� The committee-lalso ?rec- ommended that i Chest - v i s o r s ItarlWie sitifi t funds for the u1v"xe Q973-74 budget r soh that budget;;;was held;'. gm day mornuig and cart #ntW"Ana 28 mus ;ate ed VW 1# .. bd . St19 ► 58,747,.r=uP } 25SBrl;087 #rotri tbe:'S9�i373 b»dget. Ttie lioar$'s, admiaistratton and finance committee:. .expect ed to reconinend ..some;. trimming of the,_;"pro posed- budget In-'_his .r`eport tW4 'W*_ -vi$ors, 'chalman;Baker:•saidr: the salary recommendations- were made after,.comparing - - - Contra Costa with==oounties. having similar populodoas public eniploYes,r assessed;? valuation and=huger charas= terisiics and also with other surrounding coinnles in 'tfhe Committee uria[tiM visors' salaries "were Iong. overdue for adjustment;` the report stated. The $13,200 salary hii._been in effect since X1968 "We strongly feel, that, =the tSt GruuP iacam urn general, public .sbould.. sup- Port a..modest Increase :m the;salaries>`of.their elected 'V T WARD Ile* :a:suggested monthly . xs � ' of $1378' .2.. 1 � � ever, "the' Bay Area counties'":comparisonY on sal The salary study was.iais- Ary; alone, excluding..the cussed snith Prof. .Hurbert lowest "aiid the highest; and Marshall of Stanford's polio-. adding'5,-Per cent for:"infIa cal science ,department'who tion,,.-came' .to X1301:.`per approved the approach,used month for 1973-74,: by the committee I' 'arriv= Besides Baker,- committee ing• at the $15,744 per year m em b e r sincluded Elton figure, Baker said. Brombacher, ;appointed<-by Also compared were Supervisor` James.. Kenny, ; fringe benefiits.':of,:super-, John Homlotis,' appointed by a visors in other counties. Supervisor' A. 'M 'Dias, Contra Costa ca�pared fa Geno Banducci, ,appointed vorably in granting fringe .:by: .s u p e r v i s o r James benefits. Moriarty:and,I: D. Macaith- tFour factors were used,u% ur, appointed'by Superyisoi+ volving number _uf: county Warren Boggess. employes, assessed valua- l7thec committee members tion, of unincorporated .weie.William.Roddick,.head areas, population pf unincor :­of Athe Retail Clerks Union porated areas ;and annual acid Mrs.: Margaret' l?e- 5udget regp!rements Wien , Priester of the :Zeagae 'of a factor was wIihin plus` or .="Women Vofers ,Siupei�+►isor, IniiltiiS 30 'ppeer cent of the Edmund Linscheid, opposed Contra OKI, -.e,r it gPc18� to-�aay�sglary InCPeaSE coiafdered,"coctarabie. *arise of-t 'heavy,local 3ai? Fdtr"i'S1RS Ioad, did' ynot appounty Ali four-factors were`ap- one; f plie3-to.Fnesna :Kern. Riv Ule'1iQ BOARa. eri-ide. "and.,-Seto.. ;It willtiee up to ;super ;: titir'ee:were'applied:to'Sac- visors as to}whether or.txit ranito;;and =Sad; Bernar- to "submit the proposed:rata'- cum two;.ta San-Mateo and to`-voters: -'The ,supervts+cs, Oragge.and one:to,Ventura, using a new law ut .1 0, Alipaub", Santa,:Clara and voted themselves a rsuse,-:to Si1n Diego ` #14,500, but that Was sti i* T it a appbcable' factors down at the loft election.b" t ut�d;lplkd :by county voters as'..,:the result Ofrtty'a 3*fAl , Cditta ..of:an Initiative placed on the . watt::'incittde+i,at uallot oy a petition sfgtedE ilio per;month timea all by more than 20,800 Voters: four: factors The wted A subsequent court battle salary total resultlag fcotit aver and substah the u c�untttes was.t;-#41,29ti 'the initiative" esutted in a .' aid. #ire total 4ttuinbet a< that the niitiahve had times #actor sras applied mlled bade'salaries orad that pphe to 30, Divldutg a futnnre inei!easYs iter' sub- �;��bY � give-�Shie=.e�m- '"jest talvoteby fhe�`pegde . WIWI.. ;r a ^r �. ♦.T-+^iC v.,ww•-r a .r ^et \ -zr^rca:C 't'?o K cY� :]^ `+C f"} r�• x �=�..-.^+ ..�c-iiw r x v r Y..r' �*. �-f p„ a '{Z1-aa rS �`,k _'A��,y -S c,,,�''sS � i'•rfip��� K•.. a7•F' r i>z } � .�Y.�]� '�+aa t.�'�'Lr r.i.��x5�-� w 1 •� ,Tr .�• .c`riL.sM'-h� �: T3 L �kyr z�` „�; .0� �.�:v. Y r ..r4� :���-., �•�� J� t c �� ; �"�';..�-. �yp aux• ,7.', ' oa +. N. ; Y�w *Mima -4antre Costs Ti'mes� Tuesdayr, Aui0MI,1973M:- ?, u..,. "� 'L-3.a.,-.- .- t,xi.: .,... +<.' :.� +`�, Y.. i... i' - - ..-• F Ary.ftG, r s:� -rsr. 3�;3 '£=' :` � JsS-�-'`•9LL�r..L`'t^ !" h r ^ri.r,� '-�}t '`�1�'�y rr � M � � } a k F $ S'hGr ., } r ,. "JF`,y�,s.r Il + "` X .t (`�. } Hart,,gttxmmedSLl "nul}ton '5upertdpr tvrren Bag .pss a 7epor"w'a � r ftithepropasedSl9Z cntitran 'CariCotxl:commiEteechairm�n, }rProPos � s>aetit coybudget.theContra:Costa told the:futl board at the first emp7oyes�hadbeettrtritcedt r'" 8tt>tsof �Supervrsors,>ed pudgetharrngbfotxlay' lif6uGa! � a ` p�+ g,Rinaniae Gomipittee Butlfe Brag­merely, 'also boKrcu} tTJy ; _ r hs�mrsed t Xt�aatble� 'up fpr riucbotl5nx a' }-re�dctn tlttt ` o� 3 zr1 c' tSrvpl5 fent t a� fed intome•of�11s�tntllirth zntjh ,�.� ,. ���`�,r raterease. ' t1 �YcOiriear& @S�nde�te� Airirti�i'� � � } ������ ` ^�4 the amount rt would rttlwseti btrd ea as 2°i , raise the X114 tntttron att.Iune�s g_3.4 rpt g ctaan r� y statearxlIg smell rih 11 tmbalai ces'lhe audgpt _ Teehniea}l th` iioal'dTriukt�' ass eanlinue—W, ec ; 'afteee first plasetrimirung ratsethe current�83pttipert� ivhabtvtll�Ctvaii��e%avartabp�-r� `;"�'����'k x._ _ CQIIiri) kBOg a ridgy SrMIrC SuPervtlmrnt ,Litt�etd° xuduttddterriitr 4 ` f Pittabi�mdicatestru►>gIYetxt 'rom fK►meo�� thai#Itey uetopreveptat andxt; Itvnr" � s Iat�l�{CtaSe r :} 4'Rem(1t3P>i $$It�� elCBlk a Thec=mere frank toadd,thal fund, ptherthari th15iA �l"t�n�rastiC`Ct�t6dL` � rlt }([OWYty1�'� s> $y�•�v�t althoagh. '7"""" w ?�'Ms�y�a.Sf..'k'' a' +'_h+. yi C flueted j's a � r x UIQ[1�D i r8 Fs� ial It ha gposs .� x osgt berfeft Ifig:`;F[fort�"itnotisw.eramrrie`^ -M s r" _, -, ea nir k pp° - { �+ sxPrograms�:The^$upervisorsa eY'en rture:a�,Uv5time yetanother Iag2r": � ttii fundlt iri Qget eliirunsEeti` i�hetE4rit buh911`;a . _ �'i?oad i "ork -s�pjorted..g :Yernft 4 deltrons: :7 ,?ha7�sr~p� ;u�l'rsyequt�, .eecotulnendingit<� o�1�Stb�YfCo� assti�.Ftl., ..��+ S L ,i- e nail tiro Homey]ja uiklantiltag;.t �: `'feeut as 9'tlp supernsgrlly, v tii ills :;, 1 'e ti pis } avallabl ' :,t ht '.v_ .449virn"M- tSWhiCh�1�8 K am sure to a1100tatttidstoPthept�►dpht� tie 8�ra, _'''' -� cons ng over�0 r money for capitalimprmemeiil gCo6ilt`•'�p�cti�Y�ers, . -aclhiWra ,. Gentralrelief q'He[ludget g Pe cent-lp ..projects, parircutNrl thenne+v subttutf dggl'>ttgt>�iyestU Y9� •- nate ats rtsi In this ourtperso l►n4XIMCi .� county jail:Some oEitcouldgq� the' budget` rf'Cgmmending welfate Late brt.rl:lte' a �Xqunt}c iibrar -'11'ha2`. :�forsoaal progr-amsMhgcutia�'thoseareat~��LW�teelt?aijb� i ' ar a y.b�the county a�sQc1p jgn.-�ecom e because sin vont wha ns -'in real t4 =..from other funoid rbu t ltnttle"d �rh )i1eM.�tt{fget, g intensify t rare ser ces 'emphasis wilt be giv o'ne tivithout`e 8gering nec�sar�':have lett their fartiilles Baker- ' -onlyesperditu �services_providedtothepeop[e-,'.- tum o �theboardrevreWr rncu mg:w end and y, rn *noon ;;the libta The commttteg ; ... ,'af Camra Costa @ohnt ? 9 t t y_::, toward °�° -Y' ' Y . "_ refuses to;cons r Buser `,,YftV6er this wee iirlth;- tttY' among:0the�taxaaV Me o r irty. -eGminatiri ee_ Dtlibi-a Pf fiscal analtstQ#,detel. ltassocratton} �Y��$rsinge c►trzens w_ s fi nr mcirevfakon atttlthes;ll, Rrlll t arettese } zrT .-..� -ve-p oxen .welfare, as- a - -t "d- cut. .• r ^` C o u n l ir��► osis i t ii F'4^ ., u_to or amr su rt.'. ,a , tlhCerni_ ',the rru Tl1¢ bt►ait rtf 1�1fnvestii?ate,�a five 't year! .�d blind'arrd disabled_ j' puljiie )leatill�s tI seoutoEthecount- real `.Whr�etheFe3era government -re 'S nd "lifter Y p g reromme E�slo million �1 .'ba er.n - tm r-caTan� •taking over_.these•:welfaref4... y nd a -..e wit�lattilt>j'gp_ adtf ,.`medicare=have= ie'programs.' Baker.-rioted-tha projet: s-mi1liost towar�,a asdo�ttonscttgdll pita aonulatrnn already 6v iffer ce bet enteral c ente= t to ly two spakts if Prowditue that t e4ts may go ' a l Ub C a t i an s,- a n `, th a �"'� �-� rpnblic attendedthe�* tiit ,tootherhasaitals• su tants y n errate'w ch "�'�a a 'm' }. _hmringonthebudget.' , oris- u 'onfutioir h_.:Za7ifoaua �s.musC be made €,e eMrontc - ataa-processing a -�- 58rvr s rand• Tom Haller,represetiti. �� uP,_ l e stateapd.the.'counties:-`'` East Bay Chapter aJ ,r- ,earlierJdl & fa "jutr-and.�indications&e the state . National SafetyCou'ttaT agar statd"fundsr-totati-n siy�•'%riltpassat-muchtiftheburderr '. laSiateP�rict Lam' puYin a.plea for504s;[f►e r}ri'ullion foi� wor'centers�`foc uLa ;tri - counties: roourtty's contnhuti t'e tabrLtat{w3+� Tr`inu?atex< reFomu_tended _ Y, fa4:tederrk at fi} industrial and,!4 -Bz spetjtT r !r ra4ratts tam. !� Ornbudsma Baker. =3>;idr3y :> s county- _ tt$e +37 Bart X. recotnm enia -r..,* sea ae ,�9Pl;a k�jtCf<t4l11F .)ay area- �r.- _ kIialkr said,and sari ,P�d 11h, liiwltr ;D{�►e!!• ,s x. _ l a�iit _' yl„- n. 3 = { Supaei � o. � ? ie i a 1 nc_•rea, 5 yam;-VJAh � r; +'. b �L 1' :. .:r: �� „,','Contra Co oust 1KflItam 1Q: Baker= ice,> Ctni AlSlaiDfSattOabb. laterdatef. ;� upervisorsv auj�� >�2,514as president the CouaEy:<< there ri11 be a pu4Jie heanti�'1.: :Bal eisaidihesalar}carrived ' ;rear Sala ir�dl�se p bout:Taxpayers sociation- .' beterrtht mattar is decidld_ a�W4, =Mram►at boom per cent,' uride _ %t I� Pf. be iu t894 .711O=board {n tilt raisd:kw'- 6 salagystudiesmade given there �odiv*b aid'.�eyarRt[ �oTnlittae salary imm'i13204 to 1t1:50P`t One=comparid Contra eta board - appo� jtimborsz FOWstronaly the- per y�r per ep, but an, to a kkr j Avview`Comnu blicslrapldliealloWedtavots.- initi tiveprtittaf_onliWyMes�_ sirs va '?O ��ttee aka ,oaP�thtsupirv�s (it'Yion•6allatraoultad' super isoc's'"sa�rieg blig healloup# s � �` inknackingit back down to}At sirru7aF t�Ettie= the increasebdartr� Sonne rrrerabersF lowalavai:. avers . M► '-' '2hpwerlplbeJJR k.court de�ioR held t�; supeeWlioltis�� 4 ThaL'part didn't; 1�" "period.betr-a naht d thi;propk to set ttk was3I6 5 IZ ,yam well with'.severbeei'd vie �pptn>l~=tb� suparylsor::malarias by.' Th:� ��>7ping .r _r Fss ttn+e the':uuuatne but;felt• open the: rOOMI NA tjou a �+ R q• '` "ord' n ert'we t ii�t et�eet't-sanetiop f4t:the and to t u „s•.,,were cut' b rottr w 111p c p 4 F DSC lr -...-.,-..,-November 19l7�rx��fltt>iL`twould' bespifiqierg fiery tor: lncreaiteila Awn 0' Of�312: q �' ndwtion. Thew '� *ii$,2floaY b1d�i1gR tter osh �bR�io� ate .` $16744 under_ 4^ T t -y1 �.. .',i-.0•tsir rr' AMY •. ; Monday , August 20 , 073 Board meeting V111 0 DIPS : '� on the committee to review supervisors salaries? Do�have that before us . ?,'M. BAKER : Sneak now as member of the public and not as taxpayers rour. . "ould like to present to you now our report . Read report of the Salary Review Committee contained in letter dated Aurust 20 . BOGGESS : If committee unanimously sunnorted increase , I am in agreement , appears ambivalent ,. should go to the voters for approval. BAKER : Committee felt that people should have xiawxorkxko opportunity to vote on this . It was a compromise, kind of. BOGGESS : Mould agree to public hearing; on it but do not see why it should rro to voters . KENNY: Believe Chairman should set some type of hearing. Agree with Boggess that there is no need to vote. Law has been changed to make raises effective rO days after action . DIAS : Hearing will be held to permit all those who wish to comment . Pollowir_g that Board will have decision to make . Would like copies of ,your and committee recommendations made available to all who wish to have it . Perhaps should be put on Board agenda to determine date at regular board meeting and make this written report available to all. BOGGESS : See no reason not to set a date. 4/1 September 4 LINSCHEID: We are going through trying time in the next week or 10 days . Do not think now is time to consider this . Suggest wait until we get the budget and then if ,you wish to hold hearing, fine. KENNY : r•love date to , September 11 at 3 p.m. 1/!I LINSCHEID: Believe it is to soon after the budget . Why not have night meeting on this anyway? Sometime in October. BOGGESS : Hoer aboif, the September night meeting? DIAS : There is motion for September 11 . Mould like Board to be unanimous on the date however. BAKED : Believe the September night meeting =.-could be inbrder for this one occasion. Do not normally endorse night meeting. BOGGESS : Asked Kenny if Ja caz*ceto amend the r^otion for the night meeting; Boggess withdrew his second ar:d = Ied it be scheduled for September 24 at 8 n .m. No second to the motion. DIAS : Directed Clerk to this item for discussion at tomorrow ' s meeting*. NO ACTION ON THE SUPERVISORS SALARIES a f ; a Ire THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF t` CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Hearing; on ) Proposed County Budget for ) Monday, August 20, 1973 Fiscal Year 1973-19711 . ) This being the time fixed for hearing; on the proposed County Budget , proposed Special Districts (other than fire districts) Budgets , and proposed County Service Area Budgets for fiscal year 1973-1974 , notice of same having; been given for the time and in the manner required by law, the Board proceeded with the hearing;; and Supervisor 1-7. N. Boggess , Chairman of the Administration and Finance Copirittee (.Supervisor E . A. Linscheid, member) having submitted a report (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk of the Board) on the status of its first review of the proposed budget , noting in connection therewith that the proposed budget was formulated without much of the information that is essential for determination of budget requirements with precision, that a number of the missing elements (assessed valuation and available fund balances) have been ascertained while others , such as the procedures and regulations for implementation of HP 1, remain unknown ; and The committee having further reported that its first review of the proposed budget has resulted in considerable modifications and changes to both appropriations and revenues in many areas and that It is determined to develop a budget which will adequately meet the needs of the county and which will be acceptable to the taxpayers and ha.vinF suggested, therefore, that comments and recommendations on the budget be received by the Board, following; which the hearing be continued to Tuesday , August 28, 1973, at which time the committee will present another report on its recommendations for further modifications , as found necessary , to the budget ; and The Chairman having called for comments and Mr. Thomas F. Holler, Managing Director, Eastbay Chapter National Safety Council, 1322 Webster Street , Oakland , California having; appeared and requested that funds be budgeted for the Council so that it might conduct safety programs , such as defensive drivi.nr courses , in Contra Costa County ; and ''V'r. lv!illi.am P. Baker, Executive Vice President , Contra Costa Taxnav ers Association , hq.ving appeared on behalf of the Association and presented its analysis of the proposed budget (a cony of said analysis having* been filed with the Clerk of the Board) in which the Associ?tion recommends that reductions be made in certain corponents of the budget and that revenue sharing; monies be expended for items of a non-recurring; nature, such as building: the proposed county ,jail and the proposed service center, and with some nominal allocations to expand the existing rpt . Diablo State Park; and Mr. Baker having also reported as Chairman of the Salary Review Committee established to review salaries of merbers of the Board of Supervisors , and having^ submitted a letter dated August 20, 1973 (a copy of which is on file with the Clerk) setting forth the committee recommendation that salaries of t.e Board members be increased from $1,100 per month to $1,312 per month, that the increase be approved by the voters at the next countywide election, and that funds be included in the 1973-11074 budget to cover the increase ; and Im I 1. � . ■■ y-,, v .�a:'�(,, p ,yc•..�.�!,,s.''.`.:...rZ, ;:F::�.iw+s. ..... _ .<.-.,... :rn.... .r,:�R.,.,...r e'1 ._. _.. .. ,. . ... ... .A. .... S r.. . •,H4 R,aXfi.f^�'l.�'y1¢r'4�.YF�/1`:.:N ..w.�Y-..",NYM`.'./i Tom.... ....I4'.:�f' .. ... .. ..... .. Supervisor Boggess having stated that inasmuch as the committee was unanimous in its recommendation, he saw no need to put the matter before the voters but that he was strongly in favor of a public hearing; on same; and Sunervisor J . P. Kenny having indicated agreement with the position of Supervisor Boggess noting; that legislation pertaining to the salaries of supervisors was being given attention by the California State Legislature and that said legislation should be reviewed by staff as to its content and status before a hearing; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that there was no question but that a public hearing- should be held so that all persons who wished to comment might do so, that copies of the committee recom- mendation should be made available to those desiring; same, and that perhaps the matter of fixing a hearing; date should be listed on the Board agenda for consideration at its next regular meeting; and Supervisor Boggess having indicated that he saw no reason to delay setting; a date, and having moved that the aforesaid hearing be scheduled for September 4, 1973, and Supervisor Kenny having seconded the motion; and Supervisor Linscheid having stated that in view of the fiscal problems facing the county it was his opinion that consideration of the salary ratter was inappropriate at this time and should be deferred to some later date; and Supervisor Kenny having then moved that September 11, 1973 at 3 p.m. be fixed as the date for hearing_; on the aforesaid matter, and Sur..ervisor Boggess having seconded the motion; and Sunervisor Linscheid having; commented that a later date would be preferable and proposed that the matter be set for hearing at a special night meeting sometime in October, and Supervisor Boggess having; suggested September 24 , 1973, a regular night meeting date of the Board, and ?.fr. Raker having stated that although he does not normally endorse night meetings , he felt for this one occasion the September night meeting; would be in order; and Supervisor Boggess having withdrawn his second to the motion made by Supervisor Kenny (that the hearing be set for September 11) and moved that it be scheduled for September 24 , 1973 at 8 p.m. ; there was no second to the motion; Thereupon Supervisor Dias concluded the discussion by stating that the matter would be given further attention at the next meeting; of the Board , Tuesday, August 21, 1973; and No one else having appeared to speak on the proposed County Budget , proposed Special Districts (other than fire districts) Budgets , and proposed County Service Area Budgets for fiscal ,year 1973-1974 ; and On motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that August 28, 1973 at 9 : 30 a.m. is FIXED as the time for continued hearing: on the budgets and 9 : 30 a.m. on August 30, 1973 is FIXED as the time for adoption of same , as required by law. The foregoin.r order i%as passed by the following; vote: AYES : Supervisors J. P. Kenny , W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . cj"MAD COPY NOES • Mone. + a••w/r AMtk;.i. ./.n, Irma &aer.Kt..ff,f to. • aripiwul deemwa�f taLwb i. ow /iii .n ,., '!: r fwal.f .rsr:.s.r.nd[�a.�PpfN� �. :is b.v r1 e/.w;a•. ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. }-4 oriarty. v; la:. .go-. A 7:'.:.4.%: 117, i, PA 4 J:.H eamnf?.1.r4 V 430-0;l-'eio a/a.j aj .a:d Beard e/ Snp.rmi.e.m, le cc : County Administrator crr 4 U � •r U (a4j 4J 11 L i Kr 4JC Z 4J z 0 ( 4,J 121 r 4 OIL< i J uj 4J Z:Oir ro' k to a az¢ q' 4J OC - p ( Z a w a Q �k N 41 41 to N II Eft a¢ -� a�a N � � � � NUJ 41 J Z oar � U i 4J CL m s V #n CO u CL 14 4 k'{ Ql ' O4 a a H4j,% lJ, a� O z$y F ----------- ... ................. ------------------------- ....................... ...................... ......... ....... • VqD'August 20, 1973 R�;�►C�-I Hon. Board of Supervisors W. T. PAAGCIH Administration Building cue K eoARo o= SUPERVISORS Martinez, California 94553 By c T c rA co. _. Deputy Gentlemen: Enclosed is the report of your public Salary Review Committee appointed by Board Order of May 15, 1973. The following results were a compromise of the two enclosed salary studies -- one which compared Contra Costa County with counties having similar population, public employees, assessed valuation and budget characteristics, and the other comparing Contra Costa County to surrounding Bay Area counties. Our recommendations are: 1. That the Board of Supervisors salaries be increased from $1,100 per month, or $13,200 per year, to $1,312 per month, or $15,744 per ;year; 2. That this increase be approved by the voters at the next county-wide election; 3. That an amount of money sufficient to cover this increase be included in the 1973-74 budget. It was the unanimous opinion of the members of the Salary Review Committee that the Supervisors salaries were long overdue for adjustment. The current salary level of $13,200 per year is the same as that approved in 1968. We strongly feel that the general public should support a modest increase in the salaries of their elected local County officials. Respectfully submitted, William P. Baker, Chairman SALARY REVIEW COMMITTEE Elton Brombacher Appointed by Supervisor J. P. Kenny John Homlotis Appointed by Supervisor A. M. Dias Geno Banducci Appointed by Supervisor J. E. Moriarty J. D. Macarthur Appointed by Supervisor W. N. Boggess William Roddick Retail Clerks Union Mrs. Margaret League of Women Voters DePriester William P. Baker Contra Costa Taxpayers Association t . : .. -:.-�-, ?'� r..iJ-.-=:iif •.- "t <``3 .. ... 91..N ... <. ti,... t. .:Y=... Pti.. ,:a aFen y -'1 REPORT ON SUPERVISORS SALARIES PREPARED BY J. D. MACARTHUR The subject of the administration of public officials' salaries, and more particularly the salaries of County Supervisors, was discussed recently with Professor Hubert Marshall of the Political Science Department, Stanford University. Professor Marshall approved the approach used in the following proposal submitted for the Committee's consideration. The suggested salary for Contra Costa County Supervisors is a weighted average of the current (July 1, 1973) salaries of County Super- visors in California in counties which are comparable to Contra Costa. The matter of comparability was determined on the basis of the following four factors: (a) Number of County Employees, (b) Population in the Unincor- porated Area, and (d) Adopted Annual Budget Requirements. Those counties which fell within plus or minus 30% of the Contra Costa figure in a factor were considered comparable in that factor. The suggested salary was determined by weighting the salary by the number of factors in which each county was found to be comparable to Contra Costa County. S { �J COUNTIES COMPARABLE TO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY IN EACH FACTOR 1. COUNTY EMPLOYEES(') Plus or 3. ASSESSED VALUATION IN UNINCORPORATED Minus 30% of Contra Costa Co. AREA M Plus or Minus 30% of Contra Costa County Contra Costa 6073 Contra Costa $ 82419759470 Fresno 4463 Fresno 710,608,252 Kern 4783 Kern 842,954,960 Riverside 4950 Orange 661,202,433 Sacramento 7693 Riverside 657,010,654 San Bernardino 6500 Sacramento 754,058,281 San Mateo 4394 San Bernardino 1,050,345,020 Ventura 4242 San Diego 893,306,409 2. POPULATION IN UNINCORPORATED AREA 4. ADOPTED ANNUAL BUDGET REQUIREMENTS(*) M Plus or Minus 30% of Plus or Minus 30% of Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Contra Costa 187,872 Contra Costa $ 166,292,660 Alameda 134,496 Fresno 12799669386 Fresno 1871,781 Kern 1269689,285 Kern 209,535 Riverside 132,793,693 Orange 177,330 Sacramento 205,128,740 Riverside 196,720 San Bernardino 1819882,965 Santa Clara 148,720 San Mateo 130,229,305 5. COUNTY SUPERVISORS' MONTHLY SALARIES ( ) County Salary Factors Salary Weighted Contra Costa $ 1,100.00 4 $ 4,400.00 Fresno 942.00 4 3,768.00 Kern 1,523.00 4 6,092.00 Riverside 1,375.00 4 59400.00 Sacramento 1,250.00 3 3,750.00 San Bernardino 1,646.00 3 49938.00 San Mateo 1,375.00 2 29750.00 Orange 2,042,00 2 4,084.00 Ventura 1,250.00 1 1,250.00 Alameda 1,583.00 1 19583.00 Santa Clara 1,446.00 1 1,446.00 San Diego 1,833.00 1 19833.00 30 $41,294.00 $ 41,294.00 30 = $ 1,376.00 Suggested Monthly Salary - $ 1,376.00 County Supervisors Association of California Suite 201, 11th 8. L Building Sacramento, California e f .x fSUPERVISORS SALARIES - BAY AREA COUNTIES 6-22-73 MONTHLY CAR/ LIFE COUNTY SALARY MILEAGE HEALTH DENTAL INSURANCE RETIREMENT EXPENSES Alameda $ 1,583 Car Yes Yes Yes Contra Costa $ 1,100 Car Yes Yes $2,500 (Co, Retire- Yes ment system) Marin $ 11400 Yes Yes $5,000 Out of County ($1,155 if Meals & have Admin. Lodging Asst.) San Francisco $ 800 Mileage Yes No Meals San Mateo $ 1,375 Mileage Yes Yes Yes Yes Out of County ($175/mo) Meals d Lodging Santa Clara $ 1,375 Car Yes Yes Yes PERS Out of County (3 lease ($5,000 Meals d 2 mileage) Free) Lodging ($40/day + con- vention cost outside of 80 m.) Solano $ 945 Car Yes Yes PERS Meals d Lodging The average salary was $1,225 and excluding the highest and lowest was $1,239. Adding 5% for inflation the average Bay Area salary (excluding high and low) is $1,301" for 1973-74. Supervisors salaries in most counties are not included in the compensation package approved for civil service employees, although the supervisors fringe benefit package is usually the same. Expense accounts are universal for meals and out of county lodging, how- ever the exact amount varies widely. Several counties have intentions of granting unspecified salary increases this year prior to the passage of the 1973-74 county budgets. * : i TAX: CONTRA COSTA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION P.O. BOX 27 / 820 MAIN STREET / MARTINEZ,CALIFORNIA 94553 / PHONE 228.5610 August 20, 1973 Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa Administration Building Martinez, California 94553 CL-„` r uti Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Contra Costa Taxpayers Association's analysis of the proposed 1973-74 County Budget. In reviewing the proposed- budget we have limited our comments to those areas which we feel can be reduced without impairing County services. We have prepared these comments to assist the Board's Admin- istration and Finance Committee in sufficiently paring the budget to meet the expected revenue generating from the existing $2.83 tax rate. We have also included our thoughts on distribution of the $15 million accumulated revenue sharing funds. Our reservations about funding ongoing programs with limited revenue sharing funds cannot be overstressed. We believe that sufficient flexibility exists at the current tax level, considering the growth of assessed valuation, and adding to the tax rate would place an unnecessary burden on the property taxpayer at a time when the Contra Costa County citizen is facing evaporation of his spending power due to an inflationary spiral beyond his control. We appreciate the opportunity to present our recommendations to your Honorable Board. Sincerely, William P. Baker Executive Vice President WPB:mc Enclosure I x�. - 7. z�°x a :,!:e _,•,,.s;, r.�_�`� r?�s.,.,*irt,.e!' � �t5 ._ .+,..,.�. ..,.., .,a tn.. .s _ Analysis of the - Contra Costa County Budget Proposed I973-1974 MILLIONS 1971-72 Proposed 1972-73 1973-74 200 � i $192,256,747 190 180 170 ._._. $166,292,660 160 $158,758,640 150 --_ Contra Costa TaarpaYers Association AUGUST 1973 C Rq!t r INTRODUCTION This ,year the County is requesting an increase in spending of some $25,964,087 , including $2 ,Ot,8,909 for 307 new employees. This amount , which represents a 16% increase over 1972-73, is a scaled down figure from the requests of department heads which totaled $224,727 ,290. Management of County government begins with the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator's office , but is actually widely dispersed among many depart- ment heads and other management personnel. It is to this layer of county govern- ment commonly known as management , that the public must loo:: for the efficient and economic operation of county government. Management's recommendations , first to the County Administrator and then to the Board of Supervisors ' Administration and Finance Committee , were beyond the taxing ability of the public. If these recommendations were accepted , the County budget would double every 2` years, 1972-73 1973-74 $ % Allowance Request Increase Increase General C Administrative $ 14,025,353 $ 48,137 ,6801` $ 34,112 ,327* 243 7* Public Protection 25,207 ,690 32 ,546,372 7 ,338,682 29 % Health & Sanitation 4,471 ,045 5,299,406 828,361 19 % Public Assistance 104,883 ,518 113,402 ,220 8,518,702 8 % Education S Library 3,567 ,855 4 ,126,110 558,255 16 Roads 9,241 ,980 14 ,977 ,Z!42 5,735,462 62 % Recreation 61 ,249 71 ,922 10 ,673 17 % Reserves 2 ,314 ,023 5,675,000 3,360,977 145 % TOTAL $163,772 ,713 $224,236,152 $ 60,463,439 37 % Californians are now paying 40% of their total personal income in taxes , yet the original budget recommended a whopping 37% increase in spending for 1973-74 alone, It must be made clear that these recommendations were not accepted by the County Administrator or the Board of Supervisors , but the fact that these re- commendations were made shows the great pressure within government to increase the level of spending with a resultant increase in the public's tax burden. "Contains capital outlay projects. e' ME REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR 1973-74 Our impression of next year's revenue , based on the existing $2.833 tax rate, will yield approximately $191 ,833,500, broken down as follows: Carryover Balance $ 7 ,000,000 Estimated Property Tax 62 ,523,602 Budget Revenue Recap 107 ,309,898 Federal Revenue Sharing 15,000,000 Total $191 ,833,500 We have used as a basis for this estimate a total assessed valuation figure of $2 ,206,975,000. This represents a county-wide growth in assessed valuation of 10% in one year. We strongly recommend reducing the proposed budget from $207 million to $191 million, thereby avoiding an increase in the tax burden above that caused by the increase in assessed valuation. If the Board of Supervisors can stay within the $191 million figure, the County budget will be increased by 1576 over 1972-73. Much of this increase is due to an application of Federal revenue sharing funds and a one year expenditure of accumulated capital outlay funds. These two factors cause the budget increase to appear larger than that normally expected for the conduct of ongoing County services. In fact it is because of the ex- penditure of the $15 million revenue sharing funds in one year that the actual 1973-74 budget requests total $207 million ($192 + $15 million) . We have prepared the following comments in order to assist the Board of Supervisors and the public in understanding the County budget and to point out thoQP areas that we feel can be trimmed from the budget without endangering necessary services provided to the people of Contra Costa County. _ Wf.iw3S'.d!iSSs]1'. v.E,a '., 7 :'�'. •-...... ... a].. .,as,r - i _ _,s r'R.A ,,.s.x.. -S - 1 ...E1 51 4 REVENUE SHARING Due to a quirk in Federal law, over two years of Federal revenue sharing moneys will be available for expenditure by the County in 1973-74. Thus almost $15 million is available for expenditures in 1973-74, however three times this amount has been requested by various private, semi-public and public agencies. Therefore, a decision must be made as to the scope of distribution of the limited revenue sharing funds. In order to balance the budget without raising the existing tax rate, it may be necessary to fund equipment purchases and other one time expenditures with part of the Federal revenue sharing money. We have prepared our analysis based on the premise that cuts in the proposed budget can be made which will enable the County to complete several important capital improvement projects. The Contra Costa Taxpayers Associatien recommends that revenue sharing funds be limited to previously approved capital outlay projects. Because of the uncertainty of future Federal revenue sharing funds, ongoing County programs should not be supported by Federal revenue sharing money. While it would be nice to divide the money up equally among the various applicants, the impact of funding one-third of all requested programs would be nil. We recommend the following capital improvement projects: 1. COUNTY :,AIL The planning of the County jail has been in progress since early 1960. Tire need for a County jail has been e-tablished by studies and a court order, and the planning has been approved by the Board of Supervisors. The addition of needed courtroom facilities has complicated the financing of this project. Inflation is driving the cost of this project up $1 million_ per year while the 10c tax for this purpose raises only $2 million. At this rate the jail cannot be built without an increase in the property tax rate or the application of Federal revenue sharing funds. -1- sa The Contra*sta Taxpayers Association recconds that $10 million of the available Federal revenue sharing funds be added to the $7.5 million accumulated by the 10c County tax so that construction may begin during the current fiscal year. 2. SERVICE CENTER In order to bring together the financial -planning and electronic data processing services, the County has long needed a combined service center. We recormend a $4,633,000 appropriation which will benefit the taxpayers and County government alike. 3. OPEN SPACE There has been a great deal of interest for the County to participate in open space projects. The only logical approach is for the County to join with the State and Federal governments and the East Bay Regional Park District in providing open spaces in sufficient magnitude as to warrant public use by all the citizens of Contra Costa County. Promises have been made that if the County were to commit $1 million over a three year period, the State and East Bay Regional Park District would follow suit. We, therefore, recommend that an agreement be reached with these agencies, that $3 million over the next three years be added to the State Park at Mt. Diablo, and that the County budget $333,000 of its revenue sharing money during 1973-74 to this project. 4. THE FUNDING OF SOCIAL PROGRAMS FROM REVENUE SHARING FUNDS Many of the requests for revenue sharing funds were made on behalf of social programs such as community action, minority involvement, employment, handicapped, pre-school, and animal welfare_ Most of these programs are being eliminated from the Federal budget. It is impossible for the County to evaluate the social action programs in terms of cost benefit analysis. It would take literally a staff of thousands to determine whether these programs were in fact benefiting the poor, tle handicapped and those others involved. We believe it is because of this lack of positive data that the Federal government is eliminating the OEO type programs. -2- � Because of the uncertainty of continued Federal revenue sharing funds and because social action programs have not proven to assist those most in need, we strongly recommend that the County not allow itself to become involved in the funding of these ongoing programs. We request that Federal revenue sharing funds be used in one time only expenditures involving approved capital outlay projects which could not be built in the near future without Federal resources. HEALTH AND WELFARE ADMINISTRATION This is the first year that the super agency will be partially funded by new County money rather than solely by other agencies, State and Federal governments. The agency is supposed to provide direction and coordination to the three existing departments -- Social Service, Health and Medical Services. The budget recoremends an increase of from 5 to 212 positions for 1973-74 at a cost of $413,972. The budget states, "The increase in personnel over that shown for the 1972-73 fiscal year is the result of positions having been transferred into this budget unit from three divisional components of the agency and does not represent the creation of new positions." We are having trouble following the peas as they are transferred from shell to shell. Recommended 1972-73 1973-74 Increase Social Service Department 1,530 1,680 + 150 Health Department 220 224 + 4 County Medical Services 822 833 + 11 We recommend that the agency be evaluated during 1973-74 for its impact upon the social and medical programs. We further recommend that each of the new 16 positions be traced to the original agency to see that the positions there have been abolished and not refi.l.lcd. -3- ,'v .,,,x•q. .c.s p.kgk +^..�'—...!e'w. r ,'f -..ate-,`s. .... ,a .. ._ ..._, ..u; :.. . ..„ k, i� . .r�°� .. .-nom:•>�.,. ... SOCIAL SERVICES i The budget recommends an increase in the County's welfare cost of 20%, from $16,536,273 to $19,879,201 ($3,342 ,928) . ^art of this increase is to fund 150 neer staff positions estimated to cost $1 ,500,000. The welfare caseload is estimated to be increasing by approximately 576 to 10%, compared to the 25% increase of 1971 . Therefore, new staffing require- ments are not so much the result of caseload growth, but rather the application of magic caseload standards. According to data found on P. 216 of the proposed budget , the total amount of money to be spent on the welfare recipients for 1973-74 is $81 ,622 ,735. Of this amount , $24,152 ,191 is being spent on "Welfare Administration." A substan- tial. 30%, therefore, goes to administration and staff services while 7076 goes directly to the recipients for theirsupport. This is a result of the rigid organization, staffing standards and the caseload numbers game which has long plagued the Federal , State and local governing boards in their attempts to reduce the overhead expenses in the welfare program. The multitude of welfare positions has all of the flexibility and impact of the Czarist armies. It is interesting to note that although the total welfare program is increasing by 3% ($78,904,385 to $81 ,622 ,735) , the County portion is budgeted to increase by 207o ($16,536,273 to $19,879,201) . -4- GENERAL RELIEF General relief is a County only supported program for those not eligible for categorical aid (regular State and Federally assisted welfare programs). This year's budget request is a modest 40% ($965,260) increase over the budgeted 1972-73 allowance. One of the main reasons for this growth is the "under 21 (single) youth who leave their families and apply for aid in increasing numbers. .." Apparently when today's youth takes off "on his own," it's with a little help from his friends, the taxpayers. The line must be drawn to separate the needy from those who voluntarily leave their homes so that those who are destitute will receive as much help as possible. We recommend that the Board of Supervisors review the eligibility regulations, specifically with an eye toward eliminating our young, single citizens who have chosen welfare as a substitute for family support. RESULTS OF HR-1 The Federal government under the Social Security Administration has assumed responsibility for aid to the aged, blind, and disabled and will attempt to stream- line the administration of these programs by January 1, 1974. Subsequent Federal legislation requires that the difference between Federal allocations for these three categories and the substantially higher rate which California pays must be made up by the State and counties. It is expected that the State will pass part of this burden on to the counties. For this reason all of the money saved by the elimination of County workers in the above three areas, plus the County share of the grants, must be set aside to fund the cost passed down by the State for the difference in payments. -5- Ell. r t RESULTS OF HR-1 (Con' t.) However at a time when the Federal government is taking over the three adult categories and when the caseload growth is leveling, the budget is recommending. an overall increase in welfare staff of 150 positions. Recommendation: Eliminate the recommended increase of - $1,500,000 150 County welfare workers. Phase out the existing positions in - $ 225,000 the adult categories (one-half year). To Reserves $ 400,000 COUNTY HOSPITAL The effects of Medi-Cal and Medicare are finally showing up in decreased County hospital population in all four major workload areas. The budget shows an increase of $1,438,364 and 11 new positions. At a time when many counties are closing their hospital facilities, due to the choice of hospitals offered by Medi-Cal and Medicare, Contra Costa is investing some $300,000 in updating the hospital plant. We recommend to the Board of Supervisors that it investigate the long range (5 years) phasing out of the hospital business before a total rebuilding of our County hospital facility is needed. The $18,401,000 budgeted for this program should contain more than enough flexibility to cover the supplemental payments due if patients were absorbed by their local non-profit or private hospital. This would limit the County's operation to only those patients who could not adequately be cared for in other institutions. -6- HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION The budget has omitted a request to add an Executive Director and a Secretary. The annual salary costs of these two positions , including fringe benefits , is $28,925. Authorization of the staff would require the purchase of office furniture and equipment , rental of office space and operating expenses amounting to an additional $7,600. The Human :telations Commission was established in 1969 to advise the Board of Supervisors on matters pertaining to divergent groups in the community and "to foster peaceful relations and relieve tensions in the interest of preserving public peace among citizens of different races , re- ligions , and national origins." The budget contains clerical services , supplies , and mileage reimburse- meet to the Commissioners. In addition, existing staff resources from other County departments can be utilized when necessary. The Commission was designed to present an exceptional and divergent outside viewpoint to the Board of Supervisors , and not become a part of the structure of government. If qualified and enthusiastic Commission members cannot be found without requiring compensation and separate staff, the Commission should be abolished. Recommendation; Approve as budgeted. -7- OMBUDSMAN Suggested in the budget is a policy matter to establish the function of County Ombudsman to "investigate allegations , charges , or complaints by citizens against the actions and policies of government." We strongly oppose the creation of yet another layer of tax supported government ostensibly to assist in untangling the bureaucratic maze of governments which are consuming over 40% of our personal income. If government becomes so unmanageable or bureaucratic, then the citizen has the right to appear before the elected governing boards to seek clarification or assistance. Recommendation: Deny the establishment of County Ombudsman (-$32 ,000) COUNTY LIBRARY The County Library's request has been trimmed to maintain the 1972-73 level of service with an addition for the new Pinole Library, which will open February, 1974. (de request that the County evaluate the need for operating or replacing a boo'-,mobile. It does not seem reasonable to maintain 22 libraries (excluding Richmond) with staff and at the same time support a mobile unit. The cost of replacing this unit is $L,0,000 and existing staff should be transferred to fill several of the four requested new positions. -$50,000 POLICY DECISION #1 The library has requested 9 full-time and 7 permanent part-time positions to "intensify and in some cases to increase public services." The library refuses to consider the user fee concept for library cards or for minimum circu- lation charge. Their position is "adoption of a user fee would limit the opportunities to a privileged few." As their budget has now exceeded $3 million a year, which must be totally supported by the general public , further additions to their budget at this time would be inappropriate. f_ 3,1u�y -8- IN I < w..#..am .. ,. .r 'r�._. ..., •;s>t;' .E,:-,_. 4fy.. -. ,2`� .-r. r.... ,. -d..t? L.,Fj SHERIFF'S OFFICE 14ORK FURLOUGH CENTERS The County Sheriff's office was selected to receive $1.25 million State assistance in building two new work furlough centers to aid in the rehabilitation of sentenced prisoners. We congratulate the Sheriff's office on being the only County applicant so honored. However, we hasten to point out the following two liabilities: a) To construct consecutively two buildings housing 75 inmates each without first testing the program for its impact on prisoner rehabilitation is doubling the liability unnecessarily. b) The staffing costs and operating expenses are extremely high in a program of this nature. The State is attempting to bind the County to a long range commitment for a $700,000 expenditure per year for operating these centers. If an agreement with the State is signed without further evaluation, the County may become overextended in this obligation. In short, the $1,250,000 from the State is a very small part of a substantial long term County investment. JUVENILE PREPLACEMENT UNIT The budget contains a new program request to "provide a secure custody setting for up to 21 boys who are too unstable to be at the Boys Ranch, or who need a secure setting for a period of time before placement; in the past these youths have been committed to the California Youth Authority." Despite the $95 per month carrot offered per youth by the State, the cost of $232,454 and 16 staff members to accommodate 21 youths cannot be justified. The State provides the California Youth Authority facilities for those who cannot adjust to a setting like the Boys Ranch. Rather than create yet another level of custody program at over $11,000 per youth, the County should use the pxi.sti.ng State facilities. This is the year to make a decision as the program is still in the planning state. We recommend that it not be funded, - $232.454 -9- I � n, x YA ;. w+ .;ti � � . r _ ..ter. .. ..,.. ! .. ,... -•._.. ... -en r ,.ni... r w..._ r.,.. ........ .. ,- _ 1 r PUBLIC WORKS The Department of Public Works is requesting a 40% increase in its budget and a trebling of its County general fund expenditures from $468,417 to $1,222,557. Much of this increase will be used for resurfacing roads presumably because of the bad weather last winter. Resurfacing of County roads is an inexpensive investment in protecting the long term condition of our road system. However, this investment must be tempered by the availability of funds to complete this work. The greatest amount of general fund revenue expended by the Public Works Department in the last seven years was almost $600,000 in 1969-70. The following are general fund expen- ditures for public works during this period: 1966-67 $ -0- 1967-68 1489481 1968-69 961,706 1969-70 593,997 1970-71 51411 1971-72 (1749272) 1972-73 468,417 1973-74 Proposed 1,222,557 We recommend that part of this road construction be deferred until the follow- ing fiscal year. - $ 622,557 EQUIPMENT The Equipment Operation budget recommends an increase of 93%, from $505,200 to $977,154. We question the need for purchasing almost a million dollars in new equipment in one year. Included in the budget for new equipment is an excavator and four heavy duty trucks which, if approved, will cost the County $195,000. The County is currently leasing a portion of this equipment. As a general rule we feel that specialized high cost equipment should either be leased or services obtained from contractors who own the necessary equipment. We feel that a study will show that if the County involves itself in the purchase and maintenance of specialized heavy equipment, it will be far more costly than leasing or contracting services. Until such a study is made, we ask that this amount be deleted from this year's budget. -• $195,000 -10- V/ JAMES P. KENNY, RICHMOND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ALFRED M. DIAS IST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M. DIAS, SAN PABLO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAMES E. MORIARTY 2ND DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN C JAMES E. MORIARTY• LAFAYETTE W. T. PAASH. COUNTY CLERK 3RD DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, ROOM 103 AND EX OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N. BOGGESS. CONCORD P. O. BOX 911 MRS. GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID, PITTSBURG MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 PHONE 220-3000 LERK STH DISTRICT EXTENSION 2371 August 20, 1973 Board of Supervisors i a0� //�7 Contra Costa Count ` n !, 1- Administration Building , Room 103 LCLI ° o- vAcos-rMartinezCalifornia 94553 .. ._. _.__ Gentlemen: Re: Status Report - Budget for the 1973-1974 Fiscal Year The Proposed Budget for the County of Contra Costa for the 1973-1974 fiscal year has been the subject of intensive review by the Administration and Finance Committee. Department heads have met with our committee to provide information in support of their budget requests and staff of the Office of County Administrator have been present to explain the basis of budget recommendations made by the office. As indicated in the Budget Message, the Proposed Budget was formulated without much of the information which is essen- tial for determination of budget requirements with precision. A number of the missing elements - assessed valuation and available fund balances - have been ascertained while others, such as the procedures and regulations for implementation 66 HR-1, remain unknown. The committee is following a prudent approach in those areas which are uncertain in an effort to avoid future fiscal difficulties. Our first review of the Proposed Budget resulted in con- siderable modifications and changes to both appropriations and revenues in many areas. The following information summarizes the results of our reviews and deliberations:: . 1. The 307 additional permanent positions included in the Proposed Budget which were estimated to cost $2.0 million dollars have been reduced to 123 with a total cost of $1.0 million dollars (calculated at the new salary rate) . M t ice.'. . •-,. 2. 2. The total Proposed Budget of $192.2 million (excluding Federal Revenue Sharing funds) has been reduced by a net amount of $11.7 million to a revised total of $180.5 million; this total budget still is over $14 million higher than for the 1972-1973 fiscal year. 3. Unfortunately, the revenues from sources other than property taxes which go into the General Fund have also declined $11.8 pillion from the Proposed Budget to $85.8 million, which does not include any Federal Revenue Sharing funds. The decrease is primarily attributed to the transfer of adult welfare assistance programs to the federal government pursuant to HR-1 and the ceiling on welfare services imposed by federal and state statutes and regulations regulting in a revenue loss of approximately $2.4 million. Excluding revenues from the state for the Homeowners and Business Inventory exemptions for both the 1972- 1973 and 1973-1974 fiscal years, a comparison of the General Fund revenues other than property taxes reveals that the favorable trend experienced in recent years of a steady rise has been turned around with an estimated decrease of $7.1 million from last years adopted amount. A major problem develops from the decrease in revenues for welfare administration and categorical aids Mich result in a net increase of county cost in the amount of $6.1 million. 4. An important component of the financing of budget requirements is the fund balance available at the beginning of the fiscal year to finance the budget. The preliminary figure of the General Fund balance is also discouraging in that it is down about $2.4 million from the 1972-1973 fiscal year. This fund balance decrease means that in order to finance the same expenditure program for services an addi- tional $2.4 million in property taxes will be required. 5. The County Auditor-Controller has recalculated the financial requirements for permanent salaries and related wage benefits to recognize the salary program resulting from negotiations; an additional $3.6 million is required which can be financed from monies set aside in reserves. r, M 3. 5. It is estimated that about $15.7 million will be available in the Federal Revenue Sharing fund. This amount includes all funds received to date and anticipated during the 1973-1974 fiscal year, as well as estimated interest earnings. All of these monies will be appropriated to make them available for expenditure during the fiscal year. 7. Taking all of the above factors and numbers into consideration reveals some very startling and disappointing facts which must be brought to this Board's attention in order that the magni- tude of the task faced by the committee and ultimately by this Board may be brought into perspective. The proposed expenditure program after making the many revisions and cuts summarized above is "unbalanced" by about $11.4 million. By "unbalanced" is meant that applying the 1972-1973 fiscal year tax rate to current assessed valuations will result in a shortage of $11.4 million in funds to finance the current level of county programs and services; put another way, $11.4 million needs to be cut out of the budget to make ends meet. The above amount excludes any reference to Federal Revenue Sharing funds. The above summary information indicates the status of the deliberations of the Administration and Finance Committee whereby the Proposed Budget has been subjected to close scrutiny. Although the task is difficult, we are determined to develop a budget which will adequately meet the needs of our growing county and which will be acceptable to the taxpayers. It is suggested, Mr. Chairman, that with t'shis background information you invite comments and recommendations from anyone in the audience who wants to be heard on the county budget. Upon conclusion of comments it is proposed that this hearing be continued to Tuesday, August 28, 1973, at which time this committee will present another report on its recommendations for further modifications, as found necessary, to the budget. This time sch�ule will allow far further consideration by individual Board members of committee recommendations prior to adoption on .iTbu day, August 30, 1973, pursuant to law. W. N. B G E. A. LINSCHEID Supervisor, District IV Supervisor, District V m � r UGNA:.D FUNK D1vlstoN SUF£RV15055 n UDITUR. 1:HOLLER INTERNAL AUDIT noNALD 1.. COUCHCT AUDITOR-CONTROLLER OFMCE JOHN A. AYLARD ASSISTANT AUL'VLOR.CO TROLU.R l `1T {� < r lhT TAX AND SFECIAL TA SAM Ktscozo FINANCE BUILDING ACCOUNTING MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 eoY D. mads PURCHASING PHONE (415) 228•2000 WATER A. SEYDEN SYSTEMS ARTHUR T. STURG£SS August 20, 7973 DATA PROCESSING GLEN TAYLOR moo, /Y 7J Supervisor .James P. Kenny, District 1 Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District 2 ZYn�,nu(y Supervisor James E. Moriarty, District 3 Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District 4 Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District S Enclosod is material covering recommended changes for adoption of final budgets. These are for County Special Districts other than fire districts . The preliminary budgets for these districts were adopted on July 20, 1973. The schedules include districts ' requirements for expenditures, revcnue other than taxes, and estimated 1973-74 tax rate compared to actual 1972-73 tax rate. These budgets must be adopted by your board on or before August 30, 1973. 1 Ii. DONALD FUNK Auditor-Controller HDF:kt Enclosures ! :af County Special Districts 1973-74 Final budget Available Amount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes r5% , Expendi_ Total Se-.d. i9i:? - a �7 tore Total Tax Est . Tai- 19 19,74 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy InertP,ata ` 1'.atz _ n,.o ECTION TO PERS0:3S $ PROPERTY County Service Area - Fire \rca' F-1 , South }tichmond 3,563 3,568 333 3,235 �krca F-3, Antioch 139,466 139,466 24,042 115,421 21 ,724 ? ;,;';}r, .•1 '(� .4 0 Area F-4, Pittsburg _44,299 44,299 85362 335,937 4 ,27S 31 ,659 .-3�J, ,45)0 Total County Service ,area - Fire 187,333 187,333 32,737 154 ,S96 26,002 Flood Control Districts flood Control 6 I";ater Conservation 1,046,458 1,046,458 660,811 385 ,617 23,997 3;>i ,6 2 ' .`;^C .C!2O Flood Control Zone #1 224,404 224 ,404 173,106 50,998 1 ,665 At ,733 .1�"' .530 Flood Control Zone "2 :51 ,571 31 ,571 31 ,571 Flood Control Zone "33 4,866,664 4,866,664 . 3,766,614 1,100,050 52,500 1,', Floc,d Cor;troI 7Oale !,7 176,331 176,331 1-49,352 26,479 2,,57 1-1ood Control Zone ;!8 12,105 12,105 9,444 2 ,661 90 Flood Control Zone 7-'8'1 27,5911 27,89.1 21,215 6,676 219 blood Control Zone 7 9 3.5,746 33,746 25,104 5,642 255 Flood Control Zone #9A 10S,782 103,782 80,647 25 ,135 874 �'17 ,. Total Flood Control Districts 6,527,955 6,527,955 4,918,697 1 ,609,255 _ 82,355 1 ,r": )5 SLC)-,:,-.1 Drainage Districts Rorie . 1 5,728 5,728 5,728 one ;10 190,409 190,409 141 ,317 49,062 483 10 X13 104 ,418 104,418 76,570 27 ,848 30?. 27 ?`.: 250 _one 16 43,603 43,603 21 ,538 22,0 S 43 one ;r 16, Daut Service 17, '61) 5,238 22:,507 4 ,282 15 ,225 69 _one `19 1 ,761 1 ,7.61 1 ,761 c f.22 67,71(, 67,716 67 ,716 �o:.e ;177 99 ';77 �2 99,577 82,647 17 :� `-'6S iot l ;tor:; Drainapt Districts 5?.0,751 5 ,235 535,019 401 ,590 _ 134 ,429 1 ,879 :�' ,r i ` i � ` County Special Districts 11)73-74 Final Budget Available Anuurt to Duquiromoots Financing be Raised by 'taxes ---------- -------~- ------------�-- Seed. -- 1972- 157�- t ^ o Total Est. Tax 2973 1B74 Annzo�ri~ C��er�I Require- Require- Dosccd~ Require- Tax Tax ^^ ma�t � munt Buca Kate District ��io� Reserve m�ot� nx�o�� ��v]�__- ----_--- ----- -----' ili)O'IECTION TO PERSONS IrT PROPERTY oot'dlStor,:, brain ',-'.,aintcnance Districts ' 546^7I9 546,719 410^OS8 130,661 2P 338 128.323 .300 .300 )istrict '14 27,158 27,I58 I9,306 7JSS2 274 7 �J1S .040 .040 Total Stonm Drain o Districts ��3 877 573 877 435,364 138,513 � 2 ,612135,001������� ����. -------- -----�--- ---------' --------- ! Area U-2, 1,"ainut Creek 67,413 67,413 67,413 ^ Arca D-3, Antioch 40'962 40'962 40,9C2Area D-12, Sandmound Acres � 2,5972,S97 l,47S I �122 6l lj,7I .2l4 ^214 Total County Service Area - , 110'M 110,972 109j850 I �122 51 I ,071 Area 11-1, Crockett-Valona 8,952 8^952 2,969 5,931 134 6,849 .lOS .I08 Area P-2, Danville-Ala,mo 62,108 62,108 I0,746 48 ,023 l,140 46,8303 .067 ,007* 59^I03 59,I08 7^887 49,789 887 At3 ,91)2 .084 ,084* lkrua P-5, ,8O0 Roundhil- .__- � � �_� ' __-_-_--__ _________� ______'-__ Total County Service Area Police 160,568 I6O ��\ 11 ,477 1443[20 3^161 l z -----�--- -----�--- ----'�---- ---------PERSOINS 1*01"AL PROTECTION TO & & PROPERTY 80(.)1 ,486 23 ,096,724G �15,051 2-.007 ,18�7- *'Estimated Tax o is Reduced to 1972-73 Tax Rate '.__ r .4 f yfry; ''.r. Pa-c 3 County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget Available Amount to Requirements `Financing be Raised by Taxes Est. Expendi- -� Total5ecc1 . 1972- ?973- ture Total Tax Est.. Tax 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd., Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments meats Levy ment Cate Rate a 'i"ALTIJ AND SV,4ITAT ION i 4 . 1:"11 t,i L l o n Districts �Oistrict !:5 , Debt Service 11,394 233,952 245,346 245,346 District ':; 13,S40- 13,348 13,848 :,istrict = 5, Debt Service 1,532 808 2,340 2,340 District -717A 817,211 36,009 853,220 672,430 180,784 1 ,693 179,091 1 .20" 1 .207 District =�7A, Capital. Outlay 189,53O 189,530 189,530 id-.strict i;7A, Debt Service 27,7S9 27,759 7,237 20,472 65 2G,40fi .053 .182 District : 7U 12,171 2,607 14,778 14,778 District #7I B, Debt Service 16,600 16,600 10,939 5,661 5,()61 7 .970 District n15 3,657 3,687 33,637 District ' 19 80,822_ 10,008 90,830 90,330 _._. ` Total Sanitation District 1,174,554 333,384 1,457,938 1,251 ,021 206,917 1 ,758 uG:7 ,159 "g Coonty Scrvice Area - Smi.er �AI-ca S-1 , Sand3aound Slough 411 411 411 Arca S-2, Oakley 7,371 7,371 7 ,371 fol-al County Service Arca - Battier 7,782 _ 7,7g2 7,782 � _ �+ 1 `' 82 283 384 1 t65 720 1 258 803 206 X317 1 758 2n5 i5�1 F i : '1'r�L lil:,�LTii it Sl �II'��tlOti 1,13.,336 �, ,• , , 59 Co!ii:ty Service Arca - Ughting �:L.azn toy: 18,092 18 092 4,962 13,130 72 1.3,058 .033 0 °µ Area L-41 , Wrst County 60,824 60,824 17,595 43,229 601 42 ,62; .131 ia} Area L-421, North Central County 35,903 35,903 10,895 25,003 657 24 ,351 is() ,1:;6 .a` a" G i u � i �4 p 1 8, County Special Districts 1973-74 f=inal 8uddct Atiailablo Arount to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Inst . Expendi- Total Secd. 19111- 1973- ture Total Tax Est, 'fax 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd, Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments Gents Levy !Sent Rate Tate - f --- f IHC+ 1 ,M'S tcT BRIDGES (Cont t d) Ccnisttv Service Area - Lig-hting (Cont'd) ' ret! L-43, t%est Pittsburg, 35,41f, 35,416 10,795 24,621 724 ^3,`97 .210 .2I;? Wr ,t !.-IIS, Sou-ch Ccntral County 66 7 2) 66,742 20,626 46,116 778 '5 ,3-'s .002 :fret: L-46, :,orthwest County 34,357 34,357 10,064 24 ,293 802 � 23,491 .198 .19" Totu1 Count,,- Serv=ice Area - Li�Iiti„�� 251,33.1 251 ,3?4 74,937 176,397 3,633 °x C,aunt�• Service Area - Miscellaneous -__1,�La :I-1, L�e1ta merry 17,638 17,633 322 17,316 615 1( ,701 1 .92::, i . 1'6 .',rca :;-3, P'o11ini�,,;ood 7,466 7,466 2,496 4,97{1 73 ,:i 72 ,17'' 172 :1. ;z :•I-4 , San Rav,:)n 57 ,126 S7,126 19,390 37,736 872 3 ,:;:,3 ,F ,1 S"t Area :1-c; I?an,•i11 12,632 12,032 ( ,613 60014 .30 :,.:'.,1 .I72 .172 ' 0,491 9,491 2,799 0,692 4=32 (.,:':,$) 11 .197 .._7, V : c�imonc1 c ;:ort.t z•;:a :}-S, ;Jvron 5,144 5,144 5,144 1 ^75 1=34 .14^f ­_.n -_�, Orinda 2,344 2,334 566 1 ,778 3 = - .- ? 28,043 28,043 3,452 23,51 4 ,7.91 20 1)() p r -12, i:F :,oi: rite 14 186 14,186 4 ,577 9,30'9 1 ,357 7,5 } ;6 c.a .i-13, 4thc1. _aiand X457 457 179 273 '_'73 .:,SJ 3551 2 '4$ 1 554 is ,;,;.�� r `�1-1.3, C1aYLc, : 2,302 ,30 , Al.ca ..-1 �, YI?11�..c Valley 476 476 476 .-10, C1%"0 r a 3,(>15 3,615 1 ,65, 1 ,930 20 1 ,010 :�2G X26 rc:a '1-17 , ,1C)tita., :in :Ianor (Fortner R-1) 47,109 47,109 13,160) 33,941 473 S 3, t )S 250 5r} Arca .`1-1'- , Orind.: 1.00c)s 254 254 254 r: a '.-20, I:ocieo '..rea 6,239 6,239 6,239 Total County Service Area - AI .;iscellaneous 214,522 214,:322 68,413 146,109 8,196 1"7 ,'.)??.3 z �j 4R a u„ k F R { Pn�o 5 . County Special Districts 1073-74 Final Budg�t AVuiluble Amount to � Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Est . Crpoo��- � ��� �� �� �� � �� �u�ol �� �ocJ. I973- l�73- tnro Total -tux Est, Tos 1973 1974 Appropri- General Require- Require- Uusood. Rcquirm- Tux 7oX � bistricr__ �tioo Reserve ments meots Levymont Rate Rate . -- / |iIC\|�AYS BRIDGES (Cont/d) (.ounty Scrvicu Area - Rood Maintenance ' 1,740 l ?40 1,087 053 3 6SO ,O9l .09l � ��--_ .- ^" .~~^ -�~ � � �m~ . Total County Service Area Road :�!aioteoonce 1,740 l 74O 1,087 653 3 670 � -___ ` F, BRIDGES 407 �596 467,59K6 144,437 323 �159 11,833 31I3[26 Coun� Sorvi�c &ruo - Xmcrc��i�u ` 1-cu K-4 , iloraga 475,574 475,574 374^085 100P689 3,562 97,127 ,260 .350 Arca ||-5^ South Danville I0»930 10^930 4,968 5^974 7 -3 ^967 .206 ^206 Area 111-6, Oziudu 234 ,708 234,700 169,574 65'134 1"I05 64 029 .lOU .100 � �G*F,kT DECR��TION 72l���_2l2 72l����. � 212 S49,415 17179�/ 4 ,674 167,123 l67,1[23 Cowity Service Area Library 63,038 63,038 4l ^267 21 771 486 21 2,13,5 ,100 NO ,%zcz LIU-10, yiomlc 85 700 83^700 2%^7I3 62,987 1 ,927 6l 'O60 ,l60 'lSO �rcn LIS-ll , Oakley 3'077 3,077 S,077 �ruo LII-12, MoroDa 107,124 107,124 46^711 68,4I3 2,I37 S8 `276 .l60 ,ISO Area LID-I3^ Y�ouuio Valley 172,260 I73 �26�0 91,046 81 ,214 1 ,9r72 79,242 .100 .IOO i` '[AL, �UUCA[I8N 431 ,199 431I90 2O4 ,8l4 226,385 G �22 219 ��� .� � ) r Pago 0 County Special Districts 1973-•74 Final Budget Available Amoun-t: to Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes Ex;lend4-- Total Secd. 1972- 1973- ture Total Tax Est . Tax 1973) 197 1 Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Recluire- Wax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levymerit !tate I7 ate '!ISCI:LLAN,ECUS Contra Costa County Nater Agency 309,764 309,764 129,230 180,534 11 ,910 168,624 .010 .010 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS 309,764 309,764 129,230 180$ 34 11 ,910 162 ,624 GRAND TOTAL 11,203,593 288,622 11 ,492,215 8,196,414 3,291 ,030 151 ,7=18 3 ,1.i'1 .28,- a ■ x Page 7 County Special Districts 1973-74 Final Budget Available Amount to ` Requirements Financing be Raised by Taxes 1 _ Est. Ex-oendi- Total Secd. 1972- 19'3- ture Total Tax Est. Tax 1973 1974 s Appropri- General Require- Require- Unsecd. Require- Tax Tax District ation Reserve ments ments Levy ____ meat Rata- Rate Regional Occupational Center .125,938 125,935 74,344 51,594 2,801 48,787 .002 .003 i Total 125,938 125,938 74,344 51,594 2,807 48,787 r; i. r a: 4 4 S > This budget is provided under .Education Code Section 7455 and is as requested by the County Superintendent of Schools. 3 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Office of Auditor-Controller DISTRICTS GOVERNED THROUGH BOARD OF SUPERVJSORS (Other than Fire Districts) Comparison of 1972-73 Budgets, Tax Levy and Tax Rates with 1973-74 Final Budgets, Tax Levy and Estimated Tax Rate 1972-73 197.3-7=4 Final Secured Tax Final Secured E:stimited District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Tax, I;n+P } PROTECTION TO PERSONS & PROPERTY' Cc,*y Service Area - Fire F-1, South Richmond 3,725 3,322 .953 7,5673 3,235 993' F-3, Antioch 127,455 86,438 .450 139,40 93,7t1J .450 F-4, I'.ittsburn 43,594 33,756 .4SO 44,299 31 ,6S9 .450 Total County Service Area - Fire 1714,774 123,516 137,333 .128 ,59-1 FJ_ood Control Districts Flood Control k& Water Conservation 1,267,296 348,484 .020 1 ,046,458 361,620 ,020 Flood Control Zone 1 197,659 49.267 .180 224,404 49,3:13 .180 .Flood Control Zone 2 318,004 10,899 .180 31,:771 Flood Control Zone 3B 5,373,612 927,727 ,150 4,866,664 :,047,259 .150 Flood Control Zone 7 149,655 24,542 .100 176,331 24 ,022 ,100 Flood Control Zone 8 11 ,877 2,619 .030 12,10:; 2 ,511 .030 Flood Control Zone to 66,222 6,527 .100 �7,S:t=4 6,x1'.;7 .100 '� Flood Control Zone 9 25,580 8,533 .040 33),746 8,3t;9 .040 Flood Control Zone 9A _ 78,031 27,372 .140 108 ,782 27,261. .140 Total Flood Control Districts 7,487,936 1,406,370 6,5279 3 1 ,5'2-6-1 :r Storm Drainage Districts Zone 1 5,728 5,72S Zone 1.0 159,197 45,628 .350 190,403 43 ,57,1 350 Lo.!e 13 83,479 27,103 .250 1011 "418 27,5.1(, .250 7one: 16 48,426 10,39.1 .134 43)603 22,022 .1.?2 Zone 16, Construction 9,929 Zone 16, Debt Service 23,114 17,520 .216 22,507 18,150 .155 Zone 19 1,761 1 ,761 Zone 22 72,865 67;716 'Gone 77 66,083 12,723 .350 99,377 16,261 .350 #=' Total Storm Drainage Districts 470,582 113 ,873 536,019 132,.39 i= is u x � i w ` -2- oistrlcto Governed 711b Board of Supervisors ' 80±ber than Plra Districts) � 1972-73 1973-74 -Pi-na 1 Secured Tax District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Io% Dote Storm Drain 0uintwoauoo Districts District l 388*570 100^739 .300 546 719 128,323 .300 District 4 22,024 7,708 .040 27,158 7,571 .040 Total Storm Drain Maintenance District 408,594 108,447 573,877 135,901 County Service Area - Drainage Area D-3^ Malout Creek 65,000 67,413 * u D-3' Antioch 44,000 40*962 r-cla D-12, Suodmound Acres 1,250 1 ,175 ,214 2,597 1071 ,314 Total County Service Area - Drainage 1102SU 1 ,175 110,972 1 , 7f ` County Service Area - Police Area p-l^ Crockett-Valooa 8,615 6^140 .108 8^952 5^G4� .108 Area p-2, Danville-Alamo 57^580 44^444 ,067 62^188 46'SS3 ,067 ' Area 9-4^ Orinda 5S^000 5O,10O6 .084 59,108 48^902 .084 Area P-5, RnuudbilI Area _ - 30,400 40 52:", .DOO _ Total County Service Area - police 121 ,195 101 )490 160,568 142 l'`'� === TOTAL PROTECTION Y] PCP3ONIS PROPERTY 8 773 33l 1 ,854 871 8,096 ,724 2 ;7 ,187 HEALTH F, sA%,,I,r8TI0N '--- 0tuzion Districts ' strict 3, Debt Service 245^563 245,348 District S 13,379 13,848 District G^ Debt Service 4,058 2,340 District 7A 1^240.053 141^694 1 .207 353,220 179^091 1 .207 0istriut 7A^ Capital Outlay Reserve I81 '163 189,530 � District 7A, Ucbt Service 28,622 4.1702 .053 27,7S9 2O^407 .IO� District 7D 9.087 14^778 District 7D, Debt Service 22^5B7 16,600 5^661 7 .970 District 15 3,917 3,687 District 19 53,806 90,830 ' Total Sanitation Districts 1,802,745 l40 39b 1 4 S 7 9 3 23 205,1 ,/ ----------- i �1 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 1973-74 Final Secured -`Tax Final Secures -�Est xiate District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget 'Tax Lcyy Tax Rate County Service Area - Sewer Area S-1 , Sandmound Slough 411 411 Area S-2, Oakley 7,370 7 ,371 Total County Service Area - Sewer 7,751 7,732 TOTAL HEALTH & SANITATION 1,810,526 146,396 . 1 ,465,720 i11G1111AYS ; BRIDGES County Service Area - Lighting Area L-32, Kensington 16,239 13,307 .085 18,092 13,055 .085 Area L-41, West County 57,741 44,861 .134 60,824 42,628 .134 Area L-42, North Central County 30,512 25,212 .156 35 ,903 24 ,89 .156 Area L-43, Fest Pittsburg 30,770 22,965 .210 35,41( 2:5, i°)" .210 Arca L-45, South Central County 68,169 36,570 .082 66)742 45 ,335 .082 Area L-46, Northwest County 32,466 25,376 .198 34,357 - 23,491 .193 Total County Service Area - Lighting 235,877 168,291 251 ,334 172 ,763 County Service Area - :Miscellaneous - Area "4-1 , Delta Ferry 17,238 16,720 1 .926 17,6.iS 10,701 1 .926 Area M-3, Rollingwood 7,039 5,352 .172 7 ,466 4 ,3192 .172 h Area "M-4, San Ran on 47,217 37,314 .180 57,126 36 ,13(, 1 .180 'a t1-(, Danville 13,939 $ ,593 .17Z 12,632 5 'gLs., .172 rea 11-7, ;Forth Richmond 8,705 6)266 .197 9, 191 6,25!) .197 Area N-8, Byron 3,646 5,144 ' Area :i-9, Orzncla 2,130 1,551 .144 2 ,344 1,775 ,144 Area 1-lI, Orinda Arca 22,743 19,729 .535 28 ,043 20, .30( .535 Area :1-12, El Sobrante 13,750 7,414 .763 1,t ,1S6 7 ,95)2 .763 Area t4-13, Bethel Island 437 256 .359 4.S7 27,'> .359 Area %1-14, Clayton 2,306 812 .094 2,.SU2 1,539 .09t Area 11-15, Ygnacio Valley 946 476 Arca 1'.1-16, Clyde Area 2,647 2,420 .326 3,615 1 ,910 .326 Area M-17, :lontalvin "Manor (Formerly R-1) 47,1k9 33,46 .250 s_ Area '.1-19 Orincta Woods 25`1 9, 239 Area N-20, Rodoo Area , 22 `Dotal County Service Area - Miscellaneous 142,796 102,927 2144,5522 3 i F•� k E 6 3 5 S .r a v r -4- Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1972-73 1973-74 Final Secured Tax Final Secured ESt.i_,nute District Budget Tax Levy Rate Budget Tax Levy Taa Rate County Service Area - Road Maintenance Area RI)-1 , ;Muir Oaks 1,082 699 .091 1,740 650 .091 Total County Service Area-Road Maintenance 1,082 699 1,740 650 TOTAL HIGHWAYS & BRIDGES 379,775 271,917 467 ,596 311 ,326 t �(IiC RIa1T'I ON County Service Area - Recreation Aroa R-1, :,Iontalvin ;Manor (Successor M-17) 43,996 35,529 .250 Area R-4, ,Moraga 174,799 96,504 .250 475,574 97,127 .250 Area R-5, South Danville 5,595 5,227 .250 10,930 5,'1(57 ,206 . Area I:-6, Orinda 70,199 60,181 ,100 234,705 64,029 ,100 TOTAL RIECREATION 294,589 197,441 721,212 167,123 T EDUCATION County Service Area - Library Area LIB-2, El Sobrante 35,598 21,443 .1O0 63,038 21)285 .100 Area LIB-S, Pleasant Hill 1,537 a LIB-10, Pinole 96.571 61,636 .150 85,700 61 ,060 ,150 ��rea LIB-11, Oakley 3,076 3,077 Area LIB-12, ','oraga 79,629 57,902 .150 107,124 58,276 15O :area LIB-13, Ygnacio Valley 120,970 59,152 .100 11-2,260 79,242 ,100 TOTAL EDUCATIO'�, 399,731 200,183 451 ,199 2l'},8("s 1 5 aF; MISCELLANEOUS r. Contra Costa County Water Agency 289,217 .171 ,794 .010 309 ,761 163,024 ,010 4= TOTAL -MISCELLANEOUS 289,217 171 ,794 3 9,764 1 -5, I ' GRAD TOTAL 11,937,169 2,8425602 11 ,:192 ,215 13f ,': ;'::' 4: 3 i -r kiF i�. t -1- OFFICE OF COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Recommended Budget 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Services & Supplies 3,390 3,390 ® Reserve for Contingencies 178 178 t Total Requirements 3,568 3,563 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Services & Supplies 113,500 113,500 Fixed Assets 25,205 25,205 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 239 _ 761 Total Requirements _ 139,705 239 139,466 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 42,400 42,400 Fixed Assets 559 559 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 340 1,340 t Total Requirements 43,959 340 44,299 ® To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. G 4 r I i :t_r fs v.? y' T? n f. t 3 f e4 4; S 3. a i J 4 , k� kfr t "3; <�tici yk, 4 -2- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrenso Budget Flood Control Contra Costa Flood Control & Water Conservation General Services & Supplies 1,047,500 3,542 1,043,958 Fixed Assets 2,500 2,500 Reserve for Contingencies 60,590 60,590 Total Requirements 1,110,590 64,132 1,046,458 To adjust budget as requested by district and to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Services 4 Supplies 86,000 86,000 Fixed Assets 131,000 131,000 Reserve for Contingencies 7,256 - 148 7,404 Total Requirements 224,256 148 224,40 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Services £, Supplies 2,000 2,000 Fixed Assets 27,500 27,500 r Reserve for Contingencies 1,783 288 2,071 Total Requirements 31,283 288 31,571 " To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 3B (Central County) General ' i' Services & Supplies 541,000 541,000 Other Charges 28,000 28,000 Fixed Assets 3,853,000 3,858,000 Reserve for Contingencies 359,011 80,653 439,664 Total Requirements 4,786,011 80,653 4,866;664 To adjust budget as recuested by district and to maintain desired tax rate. F Y `x. :4 a . d Rt i a ,i 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Flood Control (Continued) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Services & Supplies 30,000 30,000 Fixed Assets 139,000 139,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,591 1,740 7,331 Total Requirements 174,591 1,740 176,331 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Services & Supplies 11,000 11,000 Reserve for Contingencies 506 599 1 ,105 Total Requirements 11,506 599 12,105 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Subzone 8A General Fixed Assets 23,000 2,359 25,359 Reserve for Contingencies 2,151 384 2,535 Total Requirements 25,151 2,743 27,894 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Services & Supplies 25,000 5,679 30,679 Reserve for Contingencies 2,456 611 3,067 Total Requirements 27,456 6,290 330746 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Subzone 9A General Fixed Assets 98,000 1,348 990343 Reserve for Contingencies 5,389 4,045 9,434 Total Requirements 103,389 5,393 108,782 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. k� A J4 -4- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease_ Budge, Storm Drainage Zone ##1 ('Lafayette Valley Estates) General Other Charges 500 500 Fixed Assets 5,200 5,200 Reserve for Contingencies 28 28 Total Requirements 5,728 5,728 Zone 110 01est of Danville) General Services & Supplies 500 500 Fixed Assets 65,500 107,099 172,599 Reserve for Contingencies 4,711 12,599 17,310 Total Requirements 70,711 119,698 190,409 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone #13 (North & Z'rest of Alamo) General Fixed Assets 60,000 33,926 93,926 Other Charges 1,000 1,000 p Reserve for Contingencies 3,852 5,640 __._ 9,492 Total Requirements 64,852 39,566 104,418 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone #16 (Gregory Gardens) General Outer Charges 2,000 2,000 Fixed Assets 29,000 8,639 37,63339 Reserve for Contingencies 8,127 4,163 3,964 Total Requirements 39,127 8,639 4,163 43,603 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. s j Zone ##16 (Gregory Gardens) Debt Service Other Charges 17,269 17,269 General Reserve 5,238 5,233 Total Requirements 22,507 22,507 sou 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final . Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage (Continued) Zone #19 (North Richmond Area) General Services & Supplies 250 250 Fixed Assets 1,450 1,450 Reserve for Contingencies 61 61 Total Requirements 1,761 1,761' Zone #22 (N.E. Ygnacio Valley) General Fixed Assets 65,000 65)000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,819 103 2,716 Total Requirements 67,819 103 07,716 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Zone #77 (West Sherman Area) General Other Charges 5,000 5,000 Fixed Assets 89,000 89,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,956 1,921 5,877 Total Requirements 97,956 1,921 99,877 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Storm Drainage Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General Services & Supplies 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets 494,000 494,000 Reserve for Contingencies 45,869 3,850 49,719 Total Requirements 542,869 3,850 546,719 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. District #4 (San Pablu Area) General Services & Supplies 18,500 4,689 23,189 Fixed Assets 1,500 1,500 Reserve for Contingencies 3,196 727 2,469 Total Requirements 23,196 4,689 727 27,156 -6- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget Storm Drainage Maintenance (Continued) County Service Area - Drainage 2 General Services 04 Supplies 3,000 3,000 Other Charges 3,000 3,000 Fixed Assets S7,000 57,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,413 4,413 Total Requirements 65,000 2,413 67,413 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Drainage 3 General Services & Supplies 4,000 4,000 Fixed Assets 40,000 3,035 16,962 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirement 45,000 4,035 40,962 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Drainage 12 General Fixed Assets 2,300 2,300 Other Charges 100 100 Reserve for Contingencies 188 9 197 Total Requirement 2,588 9 2,597 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. WIount\ Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General Salaries & Employee Benefits 7,889 7,839 Services & Supplies 730 730 Reserve for Contin-encies 250 83 333 Total Requiremarr,,.s 8,669 83 8,952 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. P-2 (Danville-Alamo) General Services & Supplies 58,108 58,108 Reserve for Contingencies 4,000 4 ,000 Total Requirements 62,103 62,103 -7- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease fudfiet County Service Area - Police P-4 (Orinda) General Service $ Supplies 58,108 58,108 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,000 Total Requirements 59,108 S9,108 P-5 (Round Bill Area) Services $ Supplies 29,054 946 30,000 Other Charges 400 400 Reserve for Contingencies General Reserve Total Requirements 29,454 946 30,400 To adjust budget as requested by Sheriff County Sanitatior_ District #3 (Tara Hills Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,394 11,394 General Reserve 2340951 999 233,952 Total Requirenents 246,345 999 2451*346 To adjust budget to available funds 6ti4� District 95 (Port Costa) General Services & Supplies 8,415 1,707 6,708 d Fixed Assets 7,140 7,140 Reserve for Contingencies 1,555 1 ,555 Total Requirements 171110 3,262 13,848 To adjust budget to available funds. District nS (Port Costa) Debt Service Other Charges 1 ,532 1,532 General Reserve 1,057 249 808 Total Requirements 2,589 249 2,340 To adjust budget to available funds. tr ' -8- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget A County Sanitation (Continued) District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 115,365 115,365 Fixed Assets 682,100 682,100 Reserve for Contingencies 19,746 19,746 General Reserve 43,133 7,1.24 36 ,009 Total Requirements 860,344 7,124 353,224 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. District 117A (best Pittsburg Area) Debt Service Other Charges 27,759 27,759 Total Requirements 27,759 27,759 District #iA (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Reserve g Fixed Assets 189,530 189,530 Total Requirements 189,530 189,530 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) General Services & Supplies 9,565 9,565 max_: Fixed Assets 1,500 1,500 Reserve for Contingencies 1,106 1,106 General Reserve 4,621 _ 2,014 2,607 Total Requirements 16,79?. 2,014 14-77q District #7B (Port Chicago Area) Debt Service Other Charges 16,600 16,600 Total Requirements 16,600 16,600 District #15 (Bethel Island Area) General s Fined Assets 3,219 3X 219 Reserve for Contingencies 321 147 468 w' Total Requirements 3,540 147 3,687 To adjust budget to available funds. District #19 (Byron Area) General Services & Supplies 53,475 1,Og0 52;A75 Fixed Assets 20,000 1,000 2"000 Reserve for Contingencies 7,347 1,347 4 General Reserve 9,311 597 lO ,OC;3 Total Requirements90,13:; 1,697 ?,000 �0,� 0 R To adjust budget to available funds. �p i rf , 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Sewerage S S-1 (Sandinound) General Services & Supplies 411 _ 411 Total Requirements 411 411 S-2 (Oakley) General Services & Supplies 7,370 1 7,371 Total Requirements 7,370 1 7,371 s To adjust budget to available funds. t County Service Area - Lighting s L-32. (Keiisington) General Services & Supplies 16,523 16,523 Reserve for Contingencies 1,652 83 1,569 4 Total Requirements 18,175 83 18,092 F To adjust budget to available funds. L-41 (West County) General Services $ Supplies 55,328 55,328 Reserve for Contingencies 5,533 37 5,496 Total Requirements 60,861 37 -- 60,824 s µ To adjust budget to available funds. L-42 (North Central County) General �_. Services $ Supplies 32,476 32,476 Reserve for Contingencies 3,248 179 3,427 Total Requirements 35,724 179 35,903 z; L-43 (Nest Pittsbu=g ,'area) General Services & Supplies 32,585 32,585 Reserve for Contingencies 3,258 427 2,831 Total Requirements 35,843 417 35,416 To adjust budget to available funds. All V!. �i a s x� 1 i x 3 a r I r -10- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Lighting L-45 (North Central County) General Services & Supplies 59,325 1,350 60,675 Reserve for Contingencies 5,932 135 6,067 Total Requirements 65,257 1,485 66,742 To adjust budget to available funds. P ® L-46 (North {lest County) General Services & Supplies 33,656 Reserve for Contingencies 3,366 2,665 701 Total Requirements 37,022 2,665 ' 34,357 To adjust budget to available funds. County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta Ferry) General Services F Supplies 17,047 17,047 Other Charges 506 85 591 Total Requirements 17,553 85 17,638 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-3 (Rollingwood) General Services i Supplies 6,751 37 6,7$8 Reserve for Contingencies 675 3 r 673 Total Requirements 73,426 40 7,466 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. N11-4 (South San Ramon) General Services & Sunplies 51,466 467 5.1,933 Reserve for Contingencies 5,147 46 5,193 Total Requirements 56,613 513 57,126 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works i 1 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decreaie. M", County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-6 (Danville Area) General Services & Supplies 11,289 195 1.1,484 Reserve for Contingencies 1,129 19 1,148 Total Requirements 12,418 214 12,632 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-7 (North Richmond) General Services & Supplies 8,438 190 8,628 Reserve for Contingencies 844 19 S63 Total Requirements 9,282 209 9,491 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-8 (Byron Area) General Services FT Supplies 4,805 4,805 Reserve for Contingencies 471 132 4 339 Total Requirements 5,276 132 5,144 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-9 (OrindaJ General Services & Supplies 2,094 37 2,131 Reserve for Contingencies 209 4 213 Total Requirements 2,303 41 2,344 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. NI-11 (Orinda Area) General Services & Supplies 25,834 25,834 Reserve for Contingencies 2,583 374 2,209 Total Requirements 28,417 374 28,043 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. A f V.. -12- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget u County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Continued) M-12 (E1 Sobrante Area) General Services £, Supplies 4,574 2,540 2,03.1 Fixed Assets 12,152 12,152 Reserve for. Contingencies 1,673 1,673 Total Requirements 18,399 4,213 14,186 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. 01,11-13, (Bethel Island Area) General Services & Supplies 413 3 416 Reserve for Contingencies 41 _ ._._. 41 Total Requirements 454 3 457 P To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-14 (Clayton Area) General '1,093 Services & Supplies 1,807 286 Reserve for Contingencies 180 29 _ 209 Total Requirements 1,987 315 2,302 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. M-15 (Yfinario Valley) General Services & Supplies 436 436 ® 43 3 40 Reserve for Contingencies _ u;. Total Requirements 479 3 476 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. NI-16 (Clyde Area) General 3 425 Services ; Supplies 3,425 3) 425 for Contingencies 342 152 190 Total Requirements 3,767 152 3,615 4 6, v k Fl" _N i f 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Vz . Budget ima of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Continued) M-17 (Montalvin Manor) General Services & Supplies 6,070 6,070 Fixed Assets 52,723 15,966 36,757 Reserve for Contingencies 5,879 1 ,597 4,282 Total Requirements 64,672 17,563 47,109 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. Oi-19 (Orinda Woods) General 231 231 Services & Supplies 23 Reserve for Contingencies 23 U Total Requirements 254 254 M-20 (Rodeo Area) General 2,836 2,836 5,672 Services & Supplies 567 Reserve for Contingencies 283 284 Total Requirements 3,119 3,120 6,239 To adjust budget as requested by Public Works. County Service Area - Roads RD-1 (Iluir Oaks) General 1,581 1 1,53-" Ser-%,ices & Supplies Reserve for Contingencies 158 158 0 1,740 Total Requirements 1,739 1 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Recreation R-4 (No-raga) General 120 900 Services & Supplies 120,900 P 339,021- 339,021 Fixed Assets Reserve for Contingencies 20,000 4,347 15,653 Total Requirements 479,921 4,347 475,574 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. f' z -14- 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed V inal Name of District Fund Budget _ Increase Decrease Mltudget County Service Area - Recreation (Continued) R-5 (South Danville) General Services & Supplies 9,916 23 9,939 Reserve for Contingencies _ 991. _ 991 Total Requirements 10,907 23 10,930 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. K' R-6 (Orinda) General Services ; Supplies 26,000 4,650 21,350 Fixed Assets 195,443 4,650 200,093 Reserve for Contingencies 6,000 7,265 13,265 -Total Requirements 227,443 11,91S 4,650 2;14,708 " To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. County Service Area - Library LIS-2 (El Sobrante) General Services & Supplies 10,200 20,200 Fixed Assets 81,258 28,420 52y83i8 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 1,,0_00 Total Requirements 92,458 29,420 63,038 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. b Oounty Service Area - Library LIB-10 (Pinole) General Services & Supplies 10,600 10,600 Fixed Assets 145,231 70,131 "S,100 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 +, Total Requirements 157,831 72,131 85,700 To adjust budget .to maintain desired tax rate. s LIE-11 (Oakley) General Services $ Supplies 3,076 1 3,077 ., Total Requirements 3,076 1 3,077 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. s 41 C 'Fe 1973-74 1973-74 Proposed Final Name of District Fund Budget Increase Decrease Budget County Service Area - Library (Continued) LIB-12 (Moraga) General Services & Supplies 9,350 9,350 Fixed Assets 119,549 21,775 97,774 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Requirements 130,899 23,775 107,124' To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. LIB-13 (Ygnacio, Valley) General Fixed Assets 176,316 4,056 172,260 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 2,000 Total Requirements 178$316 6,056 172,260 ,ro adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. Water Agency Contra Costa County General Salaries & Employee Benefits 4,800 4,800 Services eT Supplies 599,707 77,097 400,000 276,804 Reserve for Contingencies 20,450 7,710 25,160 Total Requirements 624,95T 84,807 400,000 509,1764 To adjust budget to maintain desired tax rate. f e J rl —1— L OFFICE OF COUNTY AUDITOR-CONTROLLER Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other Than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Recommended. Budget Ilk Estimates of Revenue other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 19733-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue E=stimates Di, ict Fi Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Firtal Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Riclmond) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4r+9 449 449 �• �i ,F-3 (Antioch Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,649 1 ,c: 39 Business Inventory Tax Relief 5,944 5 ,944 s 7,593 7,393 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 32 32 r Business Inventory Tax Relief 4,954 4, 54 4,986 4 ,086 Floo'"F, Control Contra Costa County General Planning T I ngincering 321 ,601 3;'; ,L.01 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 40,819 4 0,Z31 9 Business Inventory Tax Relief 14,517 10 .517 372,937 372,337 Zone 1 (.Marsh Creek) General Federal :subvention 2,0011 2 ,0O0 State Subvention 3,000 Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 3,838 3a Business Inventcry Tax Relief 5044 9,3442 n { A 4 2 eft F t } 1073-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Revertttc l,stimates District Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Ia 11a Budget Zone 2 (Kellogg Creel) General Business Inventory Tax Relief 8S 85 S5 "one 3B (Central County) General East Bay Regional Park Subvention 94,000 9'4,C!00 316,000 State Subvention sIG,000 S 00n 3'���,0?0 oo0 ,ederal Subvention 320,000 - ;.Iter Subvention 5,00n . Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 136,988 136,958 Business Inventory Tax Relief 14,100 I4 ,Ito £86,148 866,143 Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General 091 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,091 3,05 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,053 -. , 144 4,144 �3 ,i ^+ Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) ' General i:osmeotaner's Property Tax Relief 323 323 rt: 1-6 y° Business Inventory Tax Relief 26 ---- 349 ;+9 Zane 3A General r 7meowner's Property Tax Relief 1,060 Business Inventory Tax Relief 60 `'0 1,120 1 ,1--0 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creel:) General Ho teofner's Property Tax Relief 1 ,714 ? i Business Inventory Tax Relief ''-6 — 26 4 1,740 ' as O gsl: w KY 1 i l C ^ ` -3- 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Cuvnnus !:�,-.11imc1cs — District Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Flnzi �\o� et Zone OA General State Subvention 1^000 I ,O00 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,804 5,904 Business Inventory Tax Relief 90 _____�/U 6,994 b,��� . . . Storm DrziooQo W 77 GeomrzI �a��uut l{ill' 3ubv�o�ioo Il^0OO 11 ,00O 60O0 000 Zone 3D Subvention 6 -------- --------' ^. ^~~- . 000 Storm Drain Maintenance District #1 [Yguooim Valley Azmul General ^ County Subvention 45,000 45 ,000 - Zone 3U Subvention 2*000 2,000 Drainage Foes I0,000 10,O0O � Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14,963 1'1 .963 �r Business Inventory Tax Relief 2,783 283 74,746 71 .746 District y4 (3ma Pablo Area) General ' Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,479 ^ } 179 Business Inventory Tax Relief 144 1-14 1,623 County Service Area D-2 (Walnut Area) General Drainage Pees 47,000 17 ,000 47000 D-3 (A,tiucb) General Drainage Foes 40,000 20'(100 W�@ zi0'()0O 0-I2 (Saodmound Acres) General Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 191 191 Uusiuoos Inventory Tax Relief 25 25 216 216 ==_ | -4- l973-74 l973-7� Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District Ko��ouc Item Fond Proposed Budget _Zo_mr_a�_ao Decrease Final. uJ _ _ _ er County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General }loocoxuor/o Property Tax Relief 1^31.9 l ^2%9 Business Inventory Tax Relief 518 5I8 P-3 (Duovillo-Alamo) General zoowuor's Property Tax Relief 6,148 6^l46 0���oineos Iovc' tory Tax Relief 207 __. 267 6,413 6 `413 P-4 [Oriodu) General Homeowner's Property Ti:.x Relief 6^067 6 `667 Business Inventory 7oz Relief 101 _ 1Sl . -P~ .- ' y-S [Bound Hill Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,3335 65 ���70 3,335 65 's,270 County Sanitation Jiucrict IS (Port Costa) General Su:cr Use Charges 9,758 , 9,758 ilkric'� 7A (Itlest Pittsburg Area) General Interest on Invested Funds 1,000 Sewer Services .3^S20 Pa`�ncu�a in �i�u o� 7u�os 3U8 3U0 -- ' �0U� 1--dural Su|�Vontino 406^900 1 (', . pczrait c', Inspection 5,241 S ,2 4l Sale of Land 5,000 S ,JD0 From 7A Construction Fund 124 38ll2:4 `S 9l 431 ,961 124 ,591 5 2 1973-74 1 173-74 Revenue Estimates Revon"10 Estimates District Ij R(,.VQjjjje Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget Count), Sanitation (Continued) District 7A (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Reserve Bella Vista '29)162 29,162 Conn-Oction & Development Fees 53,000 53,000 Interest on Investments 5,000 5 ,000 87,162 -T771-6-2 District 7B (Port Chicago Area) General wcr Use Chal7ges 12,171 12 ,171 12,171 1 '171 District. t,;15 (Bethel Island Area) General Sewer Service Chargc 882 ,.;;;2 882 District 1119 (Discovery Bay) General Scl,or Services 57,300 -57,300 Engineering Services 6,000 6,c` 00 63,300 L.),unty Service Area - Lighting General L-32 (Kensington) Po-,wownerls Property Tax Relief 2,544 2 ,544 Business Inventory Tax Relief 18 is 2,562 2 ,562 L-41 (1:est County) General Homcowner's Property Tax Relief 11,442 11,-,42 Business Inventory Tax Relief 125 125 11,567 L-42 (North Ccntral County) General Hoincowner's Property Tax Relief 5,140 5,1.1 to Business Inventory Tax Relief IS9 -0- 5,299 t` 9 ' j 1 r :. -6- 1973-74 1073-44 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates 1is:rict t, Revc,ylc-,, i4em Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget Ughting (Co�;t°_ -:sued) L-43 (1 ost Pittsburg Area) General y p s er Homeowm ' Property Tax Relief 6,759 x. ^SS ,- Business In,; X85--ntory Tax Relief - -- s 7,044 �'i .044 z' L-45 (North Central County) General IIomeowrner's Property Tax Relief 5,661 17i �. usiness inventory Tax Relief 171 5,832 , 2 L-46 (North I',est County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,095 ,t495 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,128 _ 1^,128 6,223 o'223 County Service Areas - ;Miscellaneous ".1-1 (Delta Perry) General r Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 270 ?70 270 :.I-3 (Rollingwood) General Ilorcoi.nor's Property Tax Relief 1 ,607 ' ,(;07 4 BuSiTICSs Inventory Tax Relief 1 1 ,' T 1608 it;(,US s� `M-4 (Sailth San Ramon) General Y IIomc;o;ener's Property 'Fax Relief 7,561 ' ,'64 Business Inventory Tax Relief 729 8,295 1,'93 i-I-6 Manville Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 680 - - -`' Ik 680 „v F' f + p ;7 k X 3 �^ � � | ` ` ` -7- 1973-74 1073-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District 6t 1'evenue Item Fund 9 scd Budget Increase �aurmu�� Final Budget H-7 (North Richmond) General 497 Homouwncrls Property Tax Relief 497 Busiiwss Inventory Tax Relief 882 882 1^~. ~ 1,379 M-9 (Orinda) General �l9 Homeowner's Property 'fax Relief 1I9 119 119 M-11 (Orinda) QaoaraI Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,072 l 072__ 1,072 1,072 M-12 (El Sobrante) General Homcowner's Property Tax Relief 5 53 3 '`52 Business Inventory Tax Relief 252 2 305 305 13 (Bethel Island Area) General Homeowner's Property Tux Relief 25 �5_______ -- 25 NI-14 (Clayton) General IBh 's Property Tax Relief 198 ______._ lO� m �rcol General ' S69 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief S69 7 Business Inventory ��z �ol�u� 7 onoo ory � � / ) � i { `,_. 1973-74 1<)7^ 7'I� Revenue Estimates Revenue Estimates District s Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget County Service. Area - Recreation M-17 (Montalvin Manor) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 9,195 9,195 Business Inventory Tax Relief 97 97 9,292 9,2192 M-20 (Rodeo Area) General ighting Fee 3,119 3,119 3,119 3,119 RD-1 (Muir Oak) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 105i0s 105 1-5 R-4 CM ragt) General Par; Dodication Fees 194,000 19-11_,000 Ilomccwner's Property Tax Relief 12,491 12,491 Business Inventory Tax Relief 473 _ "711 206,964 Cii; 'T,3 R-5 (South Danville) General Homeowner's Property flax Relief 830 0 S0 830 S 0 (Orinda) General Park Dedication Fees 34 ,000 I oirleo:,rn:;r's Property Tax Relief 7 ,G(-,2 7 ,S62 Business Inventory Tax Relief 213 213 Interest on Investments 1 ,500 _ l , 00 43,575 -4.5,x75 County S--xvice Ar::a - Libraries LIB-2 (El Sobrante) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4,107 •4, ,107 Business Inventory Tax Relief SSS _ SS 4,195 ,l'�`S q i 4.' 4 1973-74 1973-74 Revenue Estimates Revenue t*stimates District & Revenue Item Fund Proposed Budget Increase Decrease Final Budget Libraries (Continued) LIB-10 (Pinole) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14,214 14 ,214 Business Inventory Tax Relief 288 288 14,502 11,502 LIB-12 (Moraga) General �iomeowner's Property Tax Relief 7,494 7,494 'usiness Inventory Tax Relief 284 284 7,778 LIB-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Iiomeowner's Property Tax Relief 9,464 0,414 Business Inventory Tax Relief 473 -178 : 9,942 9,`42 Contra Costa Water Agency General r County Subvention 400,000 400,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 20,205 20,205 Business Inventory Tax Relief 5,239 425,444 400,000 ".15 ,444 i ti w Affidavit of Publication STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SS. . Contra inih. i ...Legal.jClerk....... being duly sworn, deposes and sacs: That he is now, and at all times herein mentioned, has been, a resident of Contra Costa County. State of California, a citizen of the United Stales and State of California, over the age of 21 years,and in no wav or manner interested in the subject of the an- ne%ed notice: that he is now, and at all times herein men- tioned has been General Nlanager. Principal Clerk or Office L L Manager of the CONTRA COSTA TIMES, and as such RI 11anager has rharge of the records of said newspaper; that said CONTRA COSTA TIMES is, and at all times herein �-.,, mentioned was, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at the City of Walnut Creek, Contra Costa Count c. Slate of California: that the CONTRA COSTA L J• T• PAASCH TIMESwas decreed a ne1is rd er of r neral circulation June •OARD OF SUPERVISORS7(j 1952, file \o. SS193; thatpihc CONTRA COSTA TIMES NTRA COSTA CO.Deputy is the continuation of and successor of, the WALNUT CREEK COURIER JOURNAL, established in 1911 and de- creed a newspaper of general circulation October 22, 193.1, file No. 19761: and that the said newspaper is now, and at all times herein mentioned has been , printed and published Tuesday, Wcdnesdav,Thursday, Friday and Sunday of each week. That the ,legal advertisement•••••• .... .......................................... .............................................. NOTICEATO TAXPAYERS.,•_-..' a roPy of whir•h is attached upon the, left hand side of this OP pae:e opposite to this afflda%il, was printed and published in CONTRA,COSTA COUNTY said news ea to and in every issue thereof from and includ- CAIIKpRNtA f'f ' c N0TICE-•IS HEREBY-.GIVEN: ing the that printed copies of the following budget-,-,documents for the fiscal 2 11St year:1973-1974,.wtlt be available on. •••••• day of ....``�^�............. 19..7.3. August )Q, 1973 to any aaxpayec: desiring*a copy;.Proposed County. to and including the ..Z... day of ..A11g11�St.••••. Bud9ete:..Proposed 5pec1al District (of hitrIII Fire 01strld)-HudpeN,- 19 .....7.3.. . : that is to say, said notice was published and Proposed County.Service Area Budgets.Copies'maybe.obtainedat in the issues of said newspaper on the following dates: the Office ol'ttle County.Clerk, or the County Auditor Controller, ...A1Z9US.t..2.p.•1973...-.•.......-.••••• Martinez,,Cailfornia, NOTICE,-;-; 15 HE-REBY i:URT"ER GIVENahat the Board ............... ............................... of Supervisors.wfii meei.for the our- pose of fixing theaforesOld budgets for fiscal year 1473.1974-on.Monday, .............................................. August 20,-1973 at 9:30 ami in-the, Board.Ghafhbers.1•R00m 107, Ad. .............................................. ministration _ ROOM 107, Colifornia.at,whichaime,and place any taxpayer mayappear-and`be .............................................. heard:;regarding•:the ingrease,: decrease or;orllfssion of any Item In ... ........................................... Ahe-proposed budgets,-cr;forthe,Iti :,clus:imr=t►f-�Ildjfiona t;.ifefnt�+� proposals forthitincreaseor,the.in-x ........... ....... ............................ cluslon;of additional itemsshall,be, submitted'nwritingtothe Clerk of. .............................................. the Board before the close of the public hearing. "' - That the said notice was published in the newspaper proper Should there be any applications and no 'n a su a element. or,requests for a further hearing on i I file,such hearing shalt be continued' from day.-to dayuntil concluded.: (�� (;L.�� Affiant but notfaezcaefatotaloftendays. Sufe:rnbed and'e,rn to Lc1G:r mc- DATEDs-`July 24;'1473 W.T.PAASCtt,Cotmty Clerk and >S�otticia 4ierk,gf the. this ...2._. .. ,;f . . t...... . 19.73 Board of Supervisorsof ContraCosta,County,3tdto /y' of California isl.Sandra Stimler o ar u e e a o Contra Costa County, Deputy Clerk legal CCT:1681 Publish August 2,.1913OFF_ CIA IL SEA[ 1^a< SHIRLEY J. ROSS NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN I CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 1 tidy Commission Expires��prif le_107 107 i i R 11 .k'_ " ss any.-s.(nr • r COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA TO: Administration & Finance Committee Date: July 30 , 1973 Supervisors Boggess and Linscheid From: John B. Clausen, County Counsel 92P-- Re: 1973-74 Budget--County Counsel To briefly summarize the additional requests: (1) Add $1059 to account 2200 to reimburse deputies for cost of annual State Bar License Fee. (2) Lease county car for department head use on basis of attached B-3 form (estimate $2500) . Note: I would be paying all gas and oil and would not be claiming any mileage reimbursement. JBC:bc attached RECEIVED T. PAASCH CLERK RD OF SLOE ISOP.S A O TAC By eputy COUNTY COSTA COUNTY B ET REQUEST FOR CAPITAL 0WAY FISCAL YEAR 1'9.13 — i9 7`' Department: COU`TTY COr,NSEh Account Pl=bar and Title . Dept Plo.: Page _ of . .. 1. 2. 3• 5. 6, Itom QLantity Description Inventcry Estimated Administrater's Pio• Tag Mo. Cost Comments a 1 County Car@- 7. Exp1�rtion of Request - To be assigned department head for personal use- I hen not: in use by department head, car will be available for use by other depart- ment personnel to reduce pool car usage. .As an alternative to the above, I suggest a lease of a car in the $110-120 .per month range with the undersigned assuming all-costs of gasoline and o' , excepz regular maintenance service, for all car usaSe_ This suggestion could provide a real "management"incentive -for department heads and the .,�anagement group..- Attached is a study of lease cars . Also attached is an example quote from Parker-Robb Leasing, Inc. _ it March 1 , 1973 - Date 0ifike; cr DepartTent Head f John B. Clausen, Coun�r _Cou_-3szl, o - t - , A • PARKER - ROBB LE-ASI NG, ,INC. ,- P. O. BOX 635 ,, C154 7 = N. �� - �` b1�RL�.'Ui CREED, C^,LIQ ORN!A 9-1.597 if 415-934-4481 :;arc 1, 1973 nr. doh"n Clausen, County Counsel Posto fico Box 60 : 94.55 :artlrieZ, �+alif. j Dear sir; As per fro=ur re:uest this date, the fol_oNi_n information should be considered relative to the leasing o: cars for the County. The lease quoted herein would be a "closed-end" fix ;.erm lease. `ne vehicles would be leased for 24 months with a r..ilea-e limitation of 20,000 ;wiles per year. Mileage in excess of 40,000 :wiles at termination would be chargeable at the rate of 5.025 per mile for the excess. At termination, the only chargeback to the County would be for physical damageover and above normal wear and tear. The driver of said vehicle would return same to the lessor, the vehicle would be inspected for physical damage and the lease would be terminated. This type of lease takes t1aa County "out-'of-the automobile business" as they are currently enga;ed. The lease units would be delivered by a local dealer and serviced at said dealershins. Every two years .,.:e employee would get a new car. The County would be responsible to nail:, .:,-,Jure and 1=c'-eq-6e each :vehicle. The Count: would not be involved in n:.trchase or disposal of eac vehicle. This is the responsiblity of the lessor. i cheaCer monthly lease rata ma-, be o �Iai.ned by use of'an Ilepe -endlf or finance lease. This tyre o- lease rakes the Ccunty liable for a de_Fi-ite termination balance it.h no fixed term. This mase puts v^' Cou.,.t:5 "bac':-in-the autom,bllfe bus-iness again when ^ere 2s no time or m la^e 1-' le Lease ^r. i a ""s s type or I-ase - ii:�itaticn on t':t ve..�c � � ca ry_r.� cars.. cn this yp is �:_reater =han on „^e fixed terra; and om a personal viewpoint should not be conside-red by t^e Count;{. _ RECEIVED BAR 5 — 7 G7:+iY M-NMEL 'AAZTEN-U. CALIF. PARKER - ROBB LEr61ING, INC. O. BOX 63;_ f ` WALNUT CREEK, CA IFORNIA 94597 • 415-934-4481 For example, the following O,uoti;tion Cn s_ecif-c :ehicles .-;---uld. be equioned with: automatic trarz:=_Ss=:.., 0o,-;a:1 steeri' 1, CoWezl a sc brakes, V-0 engine,air condit�0:ting, tinted glass, _. d'_C, covers, remote control mi r-or a^_'- all Sa=et j was desn a tad by the State oI' California. Ot:fir :.'.'-:es a::... :-.ode-':s would be cuoted at eomoarable rates. 1973 Chevrolet 1973 Chevrolet, 1973 Che%'rol et Camaro Couze , -L. ibu COuve !iOva atcfloaCk ,595.75 5_102.32 5 97.00 5.15 5.52 5.34 T96-91 5107.74 a102.34 Under this proposal, all vechiles would be scheduled for a deliver; period of January trrough June of each year. i'ri s keeps deareciati on to a n..inimum and permits a favorable rate to dispose of the vehicles while at peak value. Thank you for your inquiry. If a ;itional information is required, i am available at your request. Sincere R. Sherdel Vice President 5 WPM 1t• `,.r-�J % � ! �S a:� ;-,.rte=� JAMES E. JEFFERIS l/ ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSCL • 1 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING • OFFICE OF f22f OA% STREET COUNTY COUNSEL a:aKLAND• CALIFORNIA 94612 COUNTY OF ALAM£DA 1418) 444.0e44 EXT. tai 1 Feor t.trer I 19 F=— .at J._ • - Lease Cars Z have a.o....a::._d the State regarding their procellze for i �; 3 _mss • for legislators. t:L1 key :Ti:..a Ibub f 1= _+ Mv r Both -Orange Couatf and the State of California have full a nten^nce leases supply with any w';3 A. accept, a L-_tz aarcz,a_ order-. 7-he Hertz leases also pro11.de for One :DO—':DO—' set of _ive replacement tires. `r;].s.i1 prover rot4tio �TI MIP:ntena`ce, a set of '3117e tires uoulcl norm-r-1-1y last from 25,CC-0 to 30,000 miles. The Hertz leases a---e also "closed-end" leases, ahic means that at the erd of the lease :eriod the County would have no further liability for the vehicle. h.L is in contrast to o;sA_ leases oehich may have a lower monthly payment but be "open-ended." This •means that at the end of the lease period, the Cotmty •would be • liabje for the dif e:ence etv' een the actual cash value as deterred _ by wholesale Blue moot; and the rz'otut of monthly payments made on t` that vehicle. _ It should a—so be _^.oted. that the figure g7aoted for a 2-year lease from He:tz 1S 37' thZIi the fig quoted on the sa=- e vehicle frcm Daly Chevrolet. The lease fo= Daly Ch+errolet did not.include re- placement tires or mwnMe"a ce, whereas the Hertz Company proposed lease does. P :z hs �•�.. � �'.i�.(` :�t••�r t�. vcr 'f tier rY '' A..a '-ate �.�_T aS. .... ♦ _L•n..�..- + �..v�:Y^+.:-��-1•+-� �c.�� - �'{:.-',•�_ _ ._.��`,�_- �.� r - ;'.� -' - �-.� y.w_�-..new iv..� �a�� G�.�u+ii�.ic..'ii i • L g 12.017 -N; AID ADYLN-ISTRATION 13.0?3 Thence, a.on? sa:d center line, Wez;erlp one and L^_I!as to the center line of 1-2ar Street; Tnerce, alo sa.-di center line, '-orcheri7 784 feet to the center -----e of SunfIo.t�er vinue (for::eriv known as ',7i'a§e arl -1-enue); Thence, mono said ce-e_ lir.? as shr,.'. on .^.'ia'_Js fi.:d in BoJ.. 45, pag-s 12, and Book 12, p={31e, of Records Of vii.'Ej3, Records of said O anl7e County, Vves:e'rly 472,3 feel, to the center line of ta:rize, Road; Thence, along said center line, SoutherI, 193 feet to t-e center Iirl�- of i Sunflower .enue f;crrerly known as Huntzing-er Avenue); Thence, alt-r- said --eater lire, Ti esteriy ..'572 i_e`, to the center lin-3 i of Harbor Boulevard; T3`e-^-_e, aler.- zaid cel-tar line, '.hTo_ther'j 26=0 feet to the cer.ter line of aiac.A.r.`'hur Boulevard (-formerly known as Talbert* Avenue); T'henc'e, alone said center line, Westerly 3100 fe•_t to the paint of } beginning. (Ord. No. 1953, Sec. 1, eff. 5127165; arzended by Oro Yo. 20147, Sa;. 1, i eff. 1127166; Ord. No. 2533, Sec. 1, eff. 11126171.) Sea 12.017. Repealed.. i (Ord.No.24SO, Sec.1; repealed by Ord.No.2U1,Sac 1, Off.12/31/70.) �• i Sea 12-01S. Compensation for Board of Supervisors. T i No member of the Board of Supervisors shall receive any compensa- tion,in addition to that pro,ided for by this section,for services rendered as a member of the Board. Such member shall receive as cornuensation for his services as such member $17,500 per annum. Such member of the Board shall also be provided the Esse of an auto- _. mobile and such group health and life insura:ue benefits and .-etir-_meat benefits as proTided Count? department heads. This compensation shall not be in lieu of ariy compensation for arm in ary Jtl:°: c_paciz c; oa amy ct r board t+r co,:-r-al 3 (Or,?No.241,.Sec.., a f j.12/511:0.) - [The next page is 1—IOHM Rev. 15 1-10JT • sc­ l � , THE BOARD OF SUpEaRVISORS C O `I T RA C OSTA C OUNTY P . 0. Box 911 Martinez, California 94553 July 27.- 1473 CONTRA COSTA Tu'ES P.O. Box 937 California 94596 ,"I nil Creek, Gentlemen: Re: Purchase Order # 52742 Enclosed is Notice to T"payers, fixing Monda , August 20, 1973 at 9: 30 a-m• as time for public hearing on proposed budget: which we wish you to publish on August 2, 19?3 Please sign the enclosed card and return it to this office. Immediately upon the expiration of publication., of publication in order send us an affidavit that the Auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Very truly Fours, W. T . PAASCH, CLERK �r By Sandra er Deput Clerk Enclosures 66-8 -75o 75o Form #17 t r In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California July 24 1973 In the Matter of Fixing Time for Hearing on Proposed Contra Costa County Budget, Proposed Special District Budgets, and Proposed County Service Area Budgets. On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that Monday, August 20, 1973 at 9: 30 a.m. is fixed as the time for public hearing, in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California on the proposed county budget, proposed county special districts (other than fire districts) budgets, and proposed county service area budgets for the fiscal year 1973-1974; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that notice of the aforesaid hearing be given pursuant to Section 29066 of the Govern- ment Code , and the public be advised that beginning August 10, 1973 the proposed budget documents will be available to taxpayers. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisors J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess. hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: County Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 24th day of July , 1973 W. PAASCH, Clerk By, &Zputy Clerk aandra &fimler H 24 5/73-15M THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR C 0 N T R A C O S ^1 A C 0 U 11 T Y P . 0. Bo= 911 Martinez, California 94553 A July 25, 1973 C014TTRA COSTA TIMES 1950 rit. Diablo Boulevard Wai nut Creek, California 91596 (� Gentlemen: U� Re : Purchase Order #r 527= Enclosed is Notice to Taxpayers, fixing_ Monday, August 20, 1973 at 9: 30 a.m. as time for public hearing on proposed budget, which we wish you to publish on July 31 , 1973 Please sign the enclosed card and return it to this office. Irmiediately upon the expiration of publication, send us an affidavit of publication in order that the Auditor may be authorized to pay your bill. Very truly yours, W. T . PAASC3, CLERK B y Sandra ;-rfimler -. Deputy .ClerL- Enclosures 6 -3 .-750 Form irT7 'iv^ C.'4?�it*�--. r .c,. a.1.+ ,... ... .. .. c.(v _ »?. .. .. i}�;E'r • v 1+, NOTICE TO TAXPAYERS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that printed copies of the following budget documents for the fiscal year 1973-1974 will be available on August 10, 1973 to any taxpayer desiring a copy: Proposed County Budget, Proposed Special District (other than Fire District) Budgets, and Proposed County Service Area Budgets. Copies may be obtained at the Office of the County Clerk, or the County Auditor-Controller, Martinez, California. NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of Super- visors will meet for the purpose of fixing the aforesaid budgets for fiscal year 1973-1974 on Monday, August 20, 1973 at 9: 30 a.m. , in the Board Chambers, Room 107, Administration Building, Martinez, California at which time and place any taxpayer may appear and be heard regarding the increase, decrease or omission of any item in the proposed budgets , or for the inclusion of additional items. All proposals for the increase or the inclusion of additional items shall be submitted in writing to the Clerk of the Board before the close of the public hearing. Should there be any applications or requests for a further hearing on file, such hearing shall be continued from day to day until concluded, but not to exceed a total of ten days. DATED: July 24, 1973• W. T. PAASCH, County Clerk and Ex-officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of Cali/,fornia Y " By f Sandr timler Deputy Clerk lift In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Jtf 1 y 1 7 19 _ In the Matter of Approving 1973-1974 Proposed Budgets for County Special Districts and County Service Areas. The County Auditor-Controller having filed with this Board 1973-1974 fiscal year proposed budgets for county special districts (exclusive of county fire protection districts) and county service areas; and The County Auditor-Controller and the County Adminis- trator having recommended that the aforesaid budgets be accepted as the proposed budgets and serve as the bases for review and consideration for adoption as the final budgets for the 1973- 1974 fiscal year; On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid 1973-1974 proposed budgets are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: Supervisor J. E. Moriarty. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc• County Administrator Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of • County Auditor Supervisors affixed this 17th day of July 0119 73 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By� Deputy Clerk Nan In ' sham H 24 7/72-15M 1 . f N i J ✓ L'RXFUNK DIVISION SUPERVISORS L c'.�tO .CONON'::c LLER INTERNAL AUDIT X l�r:e.LD. . BOUCNET AUAITOR-CONTROL! ER OFFICE JOHN A. AYLARD TAX AND SPECIAL ASStSTAY.T AUDITOP.•CONTROLLER - - CONTRA DISTRICT ACCOUNTING COSTA COUNT SAM KtYII:O FINANCE BUILDING ACCOUNTING ROY D. MEEK MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PURCHASING PHONE (415) 226.3000 WALTER A. SEYDEN SYSTEMS July 13, 1973 ARTHUR T. STURGE58 DATA PROCESSING S GLEN TAYLOR i Supervisor James P. Kenny, District I Supervisor Alfred M. Dias, District II Supervisor James E. Moriarty, District III Supervisor Warren N. Boggess, District IV Supervisor Edmund A. Linscheid, District V Enclosed are proposed budget requests for County Special Districts other than fire districts. The schedules include proposed budget, total requirements, and estimated revenues other than taxes. We request that these budgets be adopted by your board on July 17, 1973. These proposed budgets must he adopted on or before July 20, 1973. H. DONALD FUNK Auditor-Controller HDP:gb Enclosures RECl V � 171 / y7J P. CL ni( y^ SLPERVISORS COSTA uy •.. .- ..�....._.--. eputy r: .•.. N:..:�,9+'S�T..a•s n ..2E;:.. st .:•H t •;{ t....�,. _�, P+ .t�'y 1 .Y .r y: rte. N '`,I tJ t-I t-7 t,7 1-7 h- G 'S7 'T: '=1 ''i ':7 ':� '.•.7 `t7 i• ..•�� U V7 n O O O O G U C' �; +-' h' �-- +_• ►•� t-• +•-• W �• C H ^i .-• - .-' ri c7 :� O c O 0 c 0 0 0 0 u" a n. c. -r .r.. c a o Cl. c c• c_- c_. n. s- a. z n c' >:: n n n nc-:• nc� n r" , i" W V t• O C� G: C h• O C O O O O O O O ri I-- A W +- H Cfi ;7 `t1 r rt rt rt rt r+ rt rt rt 1C7 (^, i•• ••-3 rt " �'t-, W H H H H H K H H H — O O m ElD O O O O Q O O O O G r +'• .3 Ot o �' t7 +t O t� r-• W r- t-• W +- !-+ t� �f rt rt t:1 •0 .�• N N N N N tom! •�7 N � N `! C^ O :�"`i 77 G• c F. t7 to h tT t i ti.. �.'• : F•• rt C' f7 ri SIQ f7, 7 In O to W to t-+ >f L: t- C? n Cr �j H • 'o t� �• .y o ►�• to I`. ►; •v �• n f<a t C7 r t rt rt In Zia � H CU 1t tah Q` W Ct O C tH. N • 1- V OW cc w :J OW Ut V � E I— Lri -t .p O N ft. t W v Cn W A CT •L. O V W tJ 1 r � t• '" V e V .. .. ��• M .. V v u V V V e . V !-; x�•� tJ >✓ 00 V V Cn toO t J SJ tJ7 CJ r,11 Cn W C', r,\ N Ln ti✓ N 47 W to to U :J W 11 V1 'Z, W O C t S (y G1 t7 t-+ lJ V N W x =W to G� W S W .-• W T C:) t J t t0 Cn CA E F N r � t IN 0 } f H to to G CD } o, cc w i� 1t 1t v i C\ 1a h+ 1 1 (D h Gf r (1, O �t t70� W (,tC % V ON NH V GO -:A N4� W ri , G V V W N Y D A O to �. W V Cn ►+ A C� t- P O `V W Cn W N 1-1. N j t v �• t•S� t7 Co v J7 a• W V V �N t.i •tom t- to Cn O N N U7 N t7 V to tD ; r11 T t,7 h• GN Q tJ to 1- N tr: CO Cn to O kO W CO to tJ W rr O G + Q. t; I- V V N h• co W •J C\ W 0\ I--+ t+ W O� O �N tL tri Co V+ (D :J t r'3 ..V l N JO W CN cc C\ W W N Oa -3 U W p co W V tJ Ci N F+• v= (, t GY r= •.] h tl C•, �: !-• s tJ 4" Cl) W CJ 'fes T tr7 1J N •`.t :fl F-•+ (D rt 6'7 G C\ C\ W ID €•✓7 t'7 t-, W Y• 31 n tJ Cft tD F N ? to �i C>3 G: i 1 cr t-j '✓! �-' J C.> U) C OC7x t0 ? C Otr coO lco Ln (A C f � 3+-•' +� O W w r-• rt FF 7 h+ 1-• N N •ice N to V7 co tit W 1-+ to rr�+• r A C1 N C` V-, O u+�! to le v r V Y �yW 00 Cr V V V r r r Y 7 O W r !!!0o W V CT CTA CO to to C7• LO k V N rut CJt t W tJ7 ►+ V W W Ln A C'\ Q h• tJt W V W ul C Ln C\ W -J V tr7 00 A 4. •IC% i W O to rcra s, E N r • p0 to N t.� N < 11 r r Y [,0!- to CW• •t:. to co IJ CINr.Y ? Cn r n � t0J t.n to V n >-• "oUl O tc r1 t, O -: N - rt IJ7Or-nOc0 W A W tV OCA U. � N A -JO ' r.7 ._. 'r, _ t r� j_ . '.') 1,^,. - .. • t (h _ •+, ,+ y. v '.tr !ri C"s r�J U7 Vi G O rt H• u t_. C V. to rt rt (• CJ l� < rr CJ CD O rt N w y t t H• ►-3 c� w w :� rt rt 3 O O O K K C-1 (� w 'j rt •a � 'C n C rt o Cl t� .+ d -+( rt H. H .1 trt rt O w I { 1 I f; tj w 1 1 t (. H• p n 00 O t--• F--• ul .t_- N) I H p H N W FJ (A F- rt rt I-• G n n t o H• K Cr. __ -� �j W C. o o w c t t- rt H- 'C rt J O < o i rt O P. Cz y N - ::I C 1 -�:! C7 rt CJ C , v ct C/` P. H rt ;,1 En O :1 w K r O ro CD tJ ro rtro �� tri, I pP Ut H. < ~ ' < a ro n to P. y H P) 'ti P. ro C ro J N o (D-n o ° a n 71-1 H. t''• I* a Y w n y (D :3 to o G y ro ti N N rt rt b CL 1 1 1 rt ►< N O CD C7 to V C't N 1 CL V •� W Cw•t H H I ut u l O K .'D 0 ro Ln N tta% ►+ A O� CT N A O • to '7 '7 N co N tJ u1 W T W N r CL to A H 00 t,•1 Gt O O O H C0 H• 1 6W j� 00cc � o =c0000 w ct ' P.N - 1 H CD CD Ch ti �ro I.- Ct (Al n ro r� O r. H ►� W to o -0 rt V 5 V7 N to Q` H A CT 0% N A rt C w t,3 rt to :o t0 N co N N ul ut 0\ W N to t-• Ln A ►%--� ►1 0o to to%o O O l-• w (D A Cn W ul O O CT CbW O O CN O 0\ t ^O tJ ? 00 00 tO lco 00 O O to ON O I H n O t'' ro G Cr r• :n •T; ? fir'• .•� H A A J ;� CL N. V W V O N r H U, Cn V ul N 00 C V 00 t;3 A A O O V (Jt N k+• tl ►-• O\ " ul O O O\ O O CT N A � r �i to 00 W 00 I T O O O tD 'W CA C i CD t rt'O h •o A J. A A W t,� N Y• Nr a W 17 V to + ►+ 00 V O r! O` H V OG O ►-� H N � O I A H :-• A a 'tJ N tD V N v Cn ro irci*.t to N ►- t.t N CD 0 C rt H CO t-+ ►-+ N W a `G co A W rt t,t r+ V W • ri l-• V CD L .41 00 �? O :+7 (v a ^J a C � r� cKD 1 X V V cnCNo �-• c. 0 ro ww •tet (r. .t• v I W OOt-+ IJ OGl rt y, V Jrt 7a s b (? rt 0 rt Ul 0 U-1 V. t) to th Lrj tr. to rt C., p ri r.) ✓ vi w rt ct ri rt ct rt rt rt rt �j 4 0 0 rtV, (11) rt Er Cli cn rt t— H. k— H r+ I I Co PL) I I (IN p 0 0 (-) 0 0 C) 0 0 r) r) 0 to C.) K l:"+ c+ (-I rt (-t & rt rt & r+.:J t7j m at -Tr -3: r.-) Lo 0 p -t --I -j L'i til (,,, V) C: CJ • 0 J 1-0, Lrl q C.; > :r' in (r. 0 0 0 0 C 0 Cz rl- Y . . rt tj r_- 0 si tn ::; > M r+ I.— r-- > rt O d H --3 rt rt r+ rt r+ If; #4 rn, GO =l -1 pa I= n 0 to I f'• > J• ::- :3- (D En 1-< 0 0 (+ t7 p v Cri r) --: V) Z-- —C n ,j p U) P v lt5 C+ 1-t rt F--q 0 0 M H. n (D C+ ct H. to P; 0 (tp r+ 0 rt r+ ::s rt n :3 En cr SJ (D Cu rt (r r: rt En ^13 C CD CD 1-- n n 1-i C' P-1 —, -I S? H H - 0 w C: r-) la f 0 n e <. P. 11 !- r: (D r+ H. 0 0 g I"rq1 C-+ i 70 H K f) n rt Q r+ n n. 1p. H :r 0 CD o 0 �3 C-+ C+ rt I En CD > U, CA C% L-4 (A C� 1-- -4 00 co Q -13 LP cn ul C) cr, La ON rl -'j tn 'j 'ZI O t,�� CO Cc P. 00 Ln C, -4 Ln J In I-- cc 111) Lri .P N C -4 co a% N -P., C) -4 Ln ul ul UI I ) t.0 N C) 0 0 r) 0 IQ K3 O (D Ul to :j rt 0 CD IQ A H tYl IQ c-+ Ln W C% wC.1C% H --j tJ H HN0oCT HA va N -1 w ul ul C) 00 C) (D W C% CA -3 to C) IQ -j a% In P. I C N) cc --I C>3 Ln 1-11 -4 14 to Cil ul t" WA W - cc I, Ln -p- *-j C,. -4 00 '4 w J-, C) UO Ul G, ca I.- A -4 U4 J- H Ln H C:) H rl) rA c) c w tD e--.) A tD o In "C; K in C, H* -1 P 0 W 0 -=S to > Z= r+ -e' z r'l C% r-j co C- co --I F-- 7:1 1 W to 0 -.4 ton C., fl) :3 t- 0 rt :4 . C'7� . . o --I CT, -4 to W -3 Ln V L., P. CIO tn oo V wtn 0% Ul -, W -4 C:) ul H -4 (A Oo HIQ W A to t-') NJ U3 Non H .4, C% -4 00 -4 trI 110 Hc Ln L4 C) co w ON C) N t7 0 trI CD C :n 0 >< C+ N) tJ cc I.- Ln -r-% rn atn L4 W' " J- c-n 00 ':D 00 C.4 H tT us Zr- :=) Ul 'i C), CN V tJ W 00 -4 -j CN C% Cs Ln :,- -,j I, to 0 V C% is N; C-4, A --j I') co "D IQ C+ Q0 to to O ca IQ Ul W -j M m tA J co V1 L'i Cr Ul ID (D ul Go 1 4- L,I CD i 6m I 0 �t() 17� ("I r, r-; i-t i-� P+ r-1 N e; r; P; r; P; r=r rl 7 :;:v •� t� v .-j L'.1 t.] U W :0 t•1 t.: Cs V t-% t :0 1.] P t✓ v N. 7j rOt U: -- 0 2:: � 7 y :: 1 v: to I rt O r^.] C O H. p) C I' �' 11 1 t 1� 1 1 1 1 1^ 1' •lam 1� I I(D pi N 1 " N I-•+ N I + N N {-� N N N N t^ m V C• i- w O, t n C tO -1 C• to x W f j . Y Y Y .. Y Y n Y ! • (D n Y v Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1+• O 0 NO Ctt. 2CC! � Gn i7 p] CCD r+ F: i7 C n •< n t;i M C K `< O P P O n CD 1--4 Fl- :z C a O Pi 0 1-•:-a N (J I-- 1•j 1.... Pi P'3 •'., I- P•+ C_: :j rt O 11 `►S G] r`P N- ::1 0 r+ < N rr 7 C) tY `•C rt G p] `< ' C/: z a ] �' r• N P. G•l 7't rl CD G U O a .] n n r! iJ O GL c• P-' fis CD to ::I to Ccs tr w N P. o N tr ;] ► = ua -: O s (o tJ o > < > o z •; cn o co ill M' 1 P� "i 7,. H F p] 7 7 O O K I n (C P. N• p] O N pl N rt n a.`� O H. C00 P 0N t:] N O to rt 0 CD a a 0 tz CL • a P o CD p] CD N 1 rr i 0 CD z � 1 N v ¢] 9 r+ M rt 10 G X N O ti n. =3 W O� N tJ N tJ7 z F-• CA A W N 00 00 N t'l to IJ (T �l -4 Idy Ct. ♦ V V Y V ) �• N Al C% V A tO .? W - W tJ tJ A C+A to W I i W W 7-• N Ul V 0% V Co Ul tO N O V 00 N N N Ul � 1 to tO to tO .t; N -1 ILO V A tD V Cr] CT tJ co W O W N CD ^ I•. C) tr Lti (D u. CD N � P•; oro 1 � � 1 � i7 ri N CJ 0 0 O l7 N O -0 C+ V W I C % N N NUI N r+ O p] (N n N N N W A W N CO 00 N N VJ N O� V V N N• r--r 1 `� Y Y ♦ V ♦ .. Y V Y V V ♦ N •� V 14 A tV (TVAtpA WAWNNAO+ Atn CD AC!. W W N N to V C % -4 = vitoN0 �700NP.- W 1 175 t0 O tJ t0 A N V O V A O V W C% N Co v] C; W •7 a o ,-• W 1 �• c. 'JO W N p] N• 4a n N !•� V W O N %D W Ul N C % 4D N a N (D r+ V V ♦ Y V V ♦ V ♦ A � r} C] O O N NC% C % AANA00U7NUTAW AN !+• Cb Cr, V P-' W t0 CO �1 •A V -A• Ul W V M W C% -:. V Z.) N CT O N tDACTtnQ V00A00NC% m .0. W 'JO ria 0 ^3 ��0 C 0 O :j 1.0 x rtt �A W N W N CA N• NF `tn W N N CYC A` G1 U7` A V (�D v W t0 CD t.I rJ tD W V 'to U] A V 00 A �t N UI -,1 J co to V 00 _.. 1W r! Lx Q• t� U1t0N AAO V Ci: T � y n O C rn to `1 O O to 00 N A a =te N A •W N -P, 00 0% G `< � W O A W V -1 NF rt .�] rA Q CT W O U1 -j N O N 00 (n 7 O I Y. ! 0 n o n Gl W N G] F•+ rt n 1 LZ O !.'7 tJ L7 N •,: tJ � W n O N W O W �] Ul C7 r+ tO Ut t..• tO Ul CT t..7 4- tO .1 Cl V tJ n W N CZ O N W G W ] Cn N N I+ N N tO rt rQ t0 Ul I J t0 G'I C• W A lO V co -.1 N 0 .:+ W O t-+ V O• �.:. "J tri to A -I tJ �o N n 1 1.. --r +;,°"�, .a$T^�;� �';�'_� tp v ,r.:,,.re ,-,.:r., s, ...ar re-.. t �. n n.. :.dr.f5..� ,), !t.._. ... .., .... -. ..W .._..a• i f O C ., .• 1 f n W tf rt o ' r0-4 ct I-• r r [n o �- �- 0+ p rf Ft F, w trf o H H /— H `J_. CD w Ul I i O t In M v ►-. is is r K ~ G n H tD O 1 P t& CC/l O V3 tJ v O Ii O O CD n rt C ^' O '4 .� 7 O tt r1 w i t7 4 CD fly G W N *C4 `G i1 C 1- 0cn 5 L. pSi r� O CD Q O n PN 1 n --1 ''' m. ►-• 17 ' SD y w (D @ CD ',�� CDw a C '{ w o r' t 0 CD w a tr r.. t~, p LCD ,d0 N A N CN �] W N cc ` �tOt7 H ,, Ul ? N 00 0 00 A 1 r. t7 •�: W Ln H W Q JC� trJ a% r' CA j N d Q W CD pct 1 N Lo.r 1-•• y►1 v N A r tt V, tt C Ul t+ ►-+ N t7 �+ N 1- v U�1 H• ►w-• i v Ct C\ v W W V O l7 N N N 00 O W v N 1 A �• A to tD Ul W 00 O CA A A O �m A 00 1-+ t rj --t W to Ln tJl O C` t,7 Cs ►+ Co r• Ca �t .� 1.. O r l0 C C7 > Co J f1 r W U1 Ul W W U V C7 v CJ1 G�+ V 1 rt Vt W W W v W +• O W 7 -? U Cl w ct if 00 W W �' ► v tD W �] C� ` �] ;� A CJl t7 4Q (D O �' N �� O b C\ W Ln O t7 U' C` O N =I O X r tom' C% O N N• ►J 41 C\ N 41- 00 urt 0K O U Ul(A co w I l rL. In tQ V U'1 N o (+1 to :n a O tJ ~ In --3 O O r+ � lD •{ � Q. W 0 3' rY r r+ C. Vl {cam � A o • `t 71 -3 CN A Ul v N G C) c; to 4t 7 r.J t-.• ti V t C, to Y ON �J :J, V t -3 ►+ tJ tJ r+ v v •O 1... t...+ ►� ► O J Ln n W N Lrl CD O U O O O tD cC w 1-• t`J tJ X V -! c •O r r. 1-r 1-• O O Ln n W Ln t.._. O Ln 0 0 O Cr., O 1 �-� O 1 Y . '1 oil. 0 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 1 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Services $ Supplies 3,390 Reserve for Contingencies 178 Total Requirements 3,568 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Services & Supplies 113,500 Fixed Assets 25,205 Reserve for Contingencies 13000 Total Requirements 139,705 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 42,400 Fixed Assets 559 Reserve for Contingencies 10000 Total Requirements 43,959 Flood Control ' Contra Costa Flood Control & Water Conservation Gencral Services & Supplies 1,047,500 Fixed Assets 2,500 Reserve for Contingencies 60590 Total Requirements 1,110,590 Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Services 6 Supplies 86,000 Fixed Assets 131,000 Reserve for Contingencies 7,256 Total Requirements 224,256 Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Services & Supplies 2,000 Fixed Assets 27,500 Reserve for Contingencies 1,783 Total Requirements 31,283 Zone 3B (Central County) General Services £ Supplies 541,004 Other Charges 28,000 Fixed Assets 3,858,000 Total 4,7$6,011 i a Office of Cou-ity Auditor-Controller Page 2 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget Flood Control (Cont'd) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Services & Supplies 30,000 Fixed Assets 139,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,591 Total Requirements 174,591 Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Services & Supplies 11,000 Reserve for Contingencies 506 Total Requirements 11,506 Subzone 8A General Fixed Assets 23#000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,151 25,151 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Services $ Supplies 25,000 — Reserve for Contingencies 21456 Total Requirements 27,456 Subzone 9A General Fixed Assets 98,000 Reserve for Contingencies 5,389 Total Requirements 103,389 Storm Drainage Zone N1 (Lafayette Valley Estates General Other Charges 500 Fixed Assets 5,200 Reserve for Contingencies 28 Total Requirements 5,728 Zone #10 (West of Danville) General Services f, Supplies 500 Fixed Assets 65,500 Reserve for Contingencies 4,711 Total Requirements 70,711 Zone 413 (North $ I'Jest of Alamo) General 1,000 i,ixcd PSsets 60,00,0 i.csua­:c for Cci7itin-c-nci-es 3,452 Total Izequiremcnts 64,852 i Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 3 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget Storm Drainage (Cont'd) Zone #16 (Gregory Gardens) General Other Charges 2,000 Fixed Assets 29,000 Reserve for Contingencies 8,127 Total Requirements 39,127 Zone #16 (Gregory Gardens) Debt Service Other Charges 170269 General Reserve 5,238 Total Requirements 22,507 Zone #19 (North Richmond Area) General Services & Supplies 250 Fixed Assets 10450 Reserve for Contingencies _61 Total Requirements 1,761 Zone #22 (N.E. Ygnacio Valley) General - Fixed Assets 65,000 Reserve for Contingencies 22819 Total Requirements 67,819 Zone #77 (West Sherman Area) General Other Charges 5,000 Fixed Assets 89,000 Reserve for Contingencies 3,956 Total Requirements 0956 Storm Drain Maintenance District #1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General Services & Supplies 3,000 Fixed Assets 494,000 Reserve for Contingencies 450869 Total Requirements 5420869 District #4 (San Pablo Area) Services & vupplies General 18,500 Fixed Assets 1,500 Reserve for Contingencies 3,196 Total Requirements 23,196 County Scrvi.ce I,rea - Drainage 2 General Services r, Su�nl.ies 3,000 Othcr Ch ir,,,cs 3,000 Fixed Assets 57,000 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 65,000 .. .f•.-:..i- a '.,... r«: ir., e.t3'.:aA Fn�"'-_:,,-q .. _ :,a•2 1!......}+ "S; r _. y Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 4 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget •1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Drainage -3 General Services & Supplies 40000 Fixed Assets 40,000 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 45,000 County Service Area - Drainage 12 General Services and Supplies 2,300 Other Charges 100 Reserve for Contingencies 188 2,588 County Service Area - Police 1 P-1 (Crockett) General Salaries $ Employee Benefits 7,889 Services & Supplies 730 Reserve for Contingencies 250 Total Requirements 8,869 County Service Area - Police 2 General Services & Supplies 58,108 Reserve for Contingencies 4,000 62,108 County Service area - Police 4 General Services & Supplies 58,108 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 Total Requirements 59,108 County Service Area - Police 5 General Services & Supplies 29,054 Other Charges 400 29,454 County Sanitation District #3 (Tara Hills Area) Debt Service Other Charges 11,394 General Reserve 234,951 Total Requirements 2.16,345 District #5 (Port Costa) General Services F, Supplies 8,415 Fixed As�:u _ 7,140 Reservc for Continr:cncies 1,x55 Total Pcouil,_: _,a ; 17,110 r Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 5 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Sanitation (Cont'd) District #5 (Port Costa) Debt Service Other Charges 1,532 General Reserve 1,057 Total Requirements 2,589 District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) General Services & Supplies 115,365 Fixed Assets 682,100 Reserve for Contingencies 19,746 General Reserve 43,133 Total Requirements 860,344 District #7A (Nest Pittsburg Area) Debt Service Other Charges 27,759 Total Requirements 278759 District #7A (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Fixed Assets Reserve 189,530 - Total Requirements 189,530 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) General Services & Supplies 9,565 Fixed Assets 1,500 General Reserve 49621 Reserve for Contingencies , 1,106 Total Requirements 16,792 District #7B (Port Chicago Area) Debt Service Other Charges 160600 Total Requirements 16,600 District #15 (Bethel Islaid Area) General Fixed Assets 3,219 Reserve for Contingencies 321 Total Requirements 3,540 District r19 ;Byron Area) General Services & Supplies 53,475 Fixed Assets 203000 Reserve for Contingencies 7,347 General Reserve 9,311 Tat1I 90, k33 c Y.; MINIMUM MII Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 6 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budjzet County Service Area - Sewerage S-1 (Sandmound) General Services & Supplies 411 Total Requirements 411 S-2 (Oakley) General Services $ Supplies 7$ 70 Total Requirements 7,370 County Service Area - Lighting L-32 Kensington) General Services $ Supplies 16,523 Reserve for Contingencies 1,652 Total Requirements 18,175 L-41 (West County) General Services & Supplies 55,328 Reserve for Contingencies 5$ 33 60,861 L-42 (North Central County) General Services & Supplies 32,476 Reserve for Contingencies 3,248 Total Requirements 35,724 L-43 (West Pittsburg Area) General Services €, Supplies 32,585 Reserve for Contingencies 3.258 Total Requirements 35,843 L-45 (North Central County) General Services & Supplies 59,325 Reserve for Contingencies 5,932 Total Requirements 65,257 L-46 (North Nest County) General Services & Supplies 33,656 Reserve for Contingencies 3,366 Total Requirements 37,022 County Service Area - 14iscellaneous M-1 (Delta Perm•) General Scrvi.ccs , :ta.nl.ics 17,047 Other 506 Tota? {:cciui:c;::ents 171553 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 7 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Cont'd) M-3 (Rollingwood) General Services & Supplies 6,751 Reserve for Contingencies 675 Total Requirements 7,426 M-4 (South San Ramon) General Services $ Supplies 511,466 Reserve for Contingencies 5.147 Total Requirements 56,613 M-6 (Danville Area) General Services $ Supplies 11,289 Reserve for Contingencies 1,129 Total Requirements - 12,418 M-7 (North Richmond) General Services $ Supplies 8,438 Reserve for Contingencies 844 Total Requirements 9,282 M-8 (Byron Area) General Services $ Supplies 4,805 Reserve for Contingencies 471 Total Requirements 5,276 M-9 (Orinda) General Services & Supplies 2,094 Reserve for Contingencies 209 Total Requirements 2,303 M-11 (Orinda Area) General Services & Supplies 25,834 Reserve for Contingencies 2,583 Total Requirements 28,417 1.1-12 (E1 Sobrante Area) General Services & Supplies 4,574 Fixed Assets 12,152 Reserve for Contingencies 1,673 Total Requirements 18,399 1•,-13 i,,�cthcl Island Area) Genera: Services F, st!nnl i es 413 Pkscrvc> four Cuntin-encies 41 Total Requirements 454 t .. r . Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 8 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Miscellaneous (Cont'd) M-14 (Clayton Area) General Services 8 Supplies 1,807 Reserve for Contingencies 180 Total Requirements 1,987 M-15 (Ygnacio Valley) General Services $ Supplies 436 Reserve for Contingencies 43 Total Requirements 479 M-16 (Clyde Area) General Services $ Supplies 3,425 Reserve for Contingencies 342 Total Requirements 3,767 M-17 (Montalvin Manor) General Services $ Supplies 6,070 Fixed Assets 52,723 Reserve for Contingencies 5,879 Total Requirements 64,672 M-19 (Orinda woods) General Services & Supplies 231 Reserve for Contingencies 23 Total Requirements 254 M-20 (Rodeo Area) General Services & Supplies 2,836 Reserve for Contingencies 283 Total Requirements 3,119 Count;, Service Area - Roads RD-1 (Muir Oaks) General Services $ Supplies 1,581 Reserve for Contingencies 158 Total Requirements 1,739 County Service Area - Recreation R-4 (Moraga) General Services & Supplies 120,900 Fixed AsFets 339,021 Reserve :car Cunei nt; ncies 20,000 Total F.cauirc :encs 4790921 0 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 9 Districts Governed Through Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) 1973-74 Proposed Budget 1973-74 Proposed Name of District Fund Budget County Service Area - Recreation (Cont'd) R-5 (South Danville) General Services & Supplies 9,916 Reserve for Contingencies 991 Total Requirements 10,907 R-6 (Orinda) General Services & Supplies 26,000 Fixed Assets 195,443 Reserve for Contingencies 6,000 Total Requirements 227,443 County Service Area - Library Lib-2 (E1 Sobrante) General Services & Supplies 10,200 Fixed Assets 81,258 Reserve for Contingencies 1,000 Total Requirements 92,458 Lib-10 (Pinole) General Services & Supplies 10,600 Fixed Assets 145,231 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 1570831 Lib-11 (Oakley) General Services $ Supplies 3,076 Total Requirements 3,076 Lib-12 (Moraga) General Services u Supplies 9,350 Fixed Assets 119,549 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 130,899 Lib-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Fixed Assets 176,316 Reserve for Contingencies 2,000 Total Requirements 178,316 Rater Accncy Contra Costa County General Saia�i: s L :: 2 tice i;Lnefits 4,800 Services F 1unnlles 599,707 Reser(. for Cc-r:!"irt -en:ics Total Requirements 6240957 ter.. .... II ii Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 1 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimated District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Area - Fire F-1 (South Richmond) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 449 449 F-3 (Antioch Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,649 Business Inventory Tax Relief 5,944 7,593 F-4 (Pittsburg Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 32 Business Inventory Tax Relief 4,954 4,986 Flood Control Contra Costa Cotmty General Planning & Engineering 3210601 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 40,819 Business Inventory 'fax Relief 10,S17 3720937- Zone 72,937- Zone 1 (Marsh Creek) General Federal Subvention 20000 State Subvention 3,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,838 Business Inventory Tax Relief 504 9,342 Zone 2 (Kellogg Creek) General Business Inventory Tax Relief 85 85 Zone 3B (Central County) General East Bay Regional Park Subvention 94,000 State Subvention 316,000 Federal Subvention 320,000 Other Subventi on 5,000 Hoincorrner°s 1`ro ierty T_-x Rcl' of 136,988 Business Invontory Tax Relier 14,160 • 886,148 �n Vii!-.,;atrn... ... .:2c�.. '7`.•...,,r ,;fi`,;}Le �w. r� r.�.a!- ,,x .,.>�;'.;�, . ., .. .- -ER.:' _ .r.^,. p - r Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 2 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimated District $ Revenue Item Fund Recommended Flood Control (Cont'd) Zone 7 (Wildcat Creek) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 3,091 Business Inventory Tax Relief 10053 4,144 Zone 8 (Pinole Creek) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 323 Business Inventory Tax Relief 26 349 Zone 8A General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,060 Business Inventory Tax Relief 60 1,120 Zone 9 (Rodeo Creek) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,714 Business Inventory Tax Relief 26 1,740 Zone 9A General State .Subvention 10000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,904 Busincss Inventory Tax Relief 90 6,994 Storm Drainage Zone 77 General Pleasant Hill. Subvention 11,000 Zone 3B Subvention 6j000 17,000 Storm Drain Maintenance District # 1 (Ygnacio Valley Area) General County Subvention 45,000 Zone 3B Suilvention 2,000 Drainage Fees 10,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14,963 Business Inventory Tax Pelief 20783 74,746 3 ' Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 3 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 19 73-74 Revenue Estimates District. & Revenue Item Fund Recommended Storm Drain Maintenance (Cont'd) District #4 (San Pablo Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,479 Business Inventory Tax Relief 144 1,6"23 County Service Area D-2 (Walnut Creek) General Drainage 47,000 47,000 D-3 (Antioch) General Drainage Fees 40,000 40,000 D-12 (Sandmound Acres) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 191 Business Inventory Tax Relief 25 216 County Service Area - Police P-1 (Crockett) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,219 Business Inventory Tax Relief 518 1,737 P-2 (Danville-Alamo) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 6,146 Business Inventory Tax Relief 267 6,413 P-4 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 6,667 Business Inventory Tax Relief 181 6,848 P-5 (Round Hill Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 32335 3,335 County Sanitation District #5 (Part Costa) General Sc er Use Charges 90758 9,758 1 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 4 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Sanitation (Cont'd) District 7A (hest Pittsburg Area) General __M Interest on Invested Funds 1,000 Sewer Services 3,520 Payments in Lieu of Taxes 300 Federal Subvention 466,900 Permit $ Inspection 5,241 Sale of Land 50000 481,961 District 7A (West Pittsburg Area) Capital Outlay Bella Vista Reserve 29,162 Connection & Development Fees 53,C00 Interest on Investments 5,000 87,162 District 7B (Port Chicago Area) General Sewer Use Charges 12,171 12,171 District #15 (Bethel Island Area) General Sewer Service Charge 882 882 District #19 (Discovery Bay) General Sewer Services 57,300 Engineering Services 60000 63,300 County Service Area - Lighting L-32 (Kensington) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 2,544 Business Inventory Tax Relief 18 2,562 L-41 (West County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 11,442 Business Inventory Tax Relief 125 11,567 �7 n r Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 5 Special Districts Under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Area - Lighting (Cont'd) L-42 (North Cenral County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,140 Business Inventory Tax Relief 159 5,299 L-43 (Nest Pittsburg Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 6,759 Business Inventory Tax Relief 285 7,044 L-45 (North Central County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,661 Business Inventory Tax Relief 171 5,832 L-46 (North West County) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 5,095 Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,128 6,223 County Service Area - Miscellaneous M-1 (Delta ferry) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 270 270 M-3 (Rollingtieood) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 1,607 Business lnventory Tax Relief 1 1,608 M-4 (South San Ramon) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 7,564 Business Inventory Tax Relief 729 8,293 K-6 (Danville: Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 680 680 M-7 (North Richmond) General lloi:eo;:ner's Property Tax Palief 497 Business Inventory Tax Relief 882 1,379 ooma Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 6 Special Districts ander Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimates District & Revenue Item Fund Recommended County Service Areas - Miscellaneous (Cont'd) M-9 (Orinda) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 119 119 M-11 (Orinda) General Business Inventory Tax Relief 1,072 1,07'2 M-12 (El Sobrante) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 53 Business Inventory Tax Relief 252 305 M-13 (Bethel Island Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 25 25 NI-14 (Clayton) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 196 196 M-16 (Clyde Area) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 569 Business Inventory Tax Relief 7 576 M-17 (Montalvin Manor) General Homeormer's Property Tax Relief 9,195 Business Inventory Tax Relief 97 9,292 NI-20 (Rodeo Area) General Lighting Fee ___3j 119 3,119 RD-1 (Muir Oak) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 105 105 Office of County Auditor-Controller Page 7 Special Districts under Authority of County Board of Supervisors (Other than Fire Districts) Estimates of Revenue Other than Current Property Taxes for Proposed 1973-74 Budget (Included in available financing) 1973-74 Revenue Estimates District $ Revenue Item Fund Recor+.mended County Service Area - Recreation R-4 (Moraga) General Park Dedication Fees 194,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 12,491 Business Inventory Tax Relief 473 206,964 R-5 (South Danville) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 880 880 R-6 (Orinda) General Park Dedication Fees 34,000 Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 70862 Business Inventory Tax Relief 213 Interest on Investments 1,500 433#575 County Service Areas - Libraries LIB-2 (E1 Sobrante) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 4,107 Business Inventory Tax Relief 88 4,195 LIB-10 (Pinole) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 14,214 Business Inventory Tax Relief 288 14.502 LIB-12 (Moraga) General Homeowner's Property Tax Relief 7,494 Business Inventory Tax Relief 284 7,778 LIB-13 (Ygnacio Valley) General Hor,cowner's Property Tax Relief 9,464 Business Inventory Tax Relief 478 9,942 Contra Costen i','nter Al-oncy General County Subvention 400j, U0^0 Icor:e o,:per's I'ro )erty 'Pax Rcli_-f 20,205 Business Inventory Tax Relief 511239 42 ,444 `z n 1 1 In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California June 19 , 19 73- In the Matter of Acknowledging Receipt of 1973-1974 Budget Message of the County Administrator. The County Administrator having submitted his BUDGET MESSAGE for the fiscal year 1973-1974; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor J. E. Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P . Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that receipt of said BUDGET MESSAGE is ACKNOWLEDGED; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that said BUDGET MESSAGE is APPROVED as the basis for the preparation and issuance by the y County. Auditor-Controller of the 1973-1974 Proposed County Budget; and IT IS BY THE BOARD FURTHER ORDERED that the BUDGET MESSAGE is REFERRED to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid). The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. . I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Auditor-Controller Witness my hand and the Seat of the Board of Administrator Supervisors Board Committee affixed this 19th day of June W.J. PAASCH, Clerk BAy . Deputy Clerk dra timler H 24 7/72-15M � e I In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California Mav 29 1973 In the Matter of Request that Funds be Allocated to the San Francisco Bay Area Council, Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having brought to the attention of the Board a May 23, 1973 communication received by him from the San Francisco Bay Area Council in which communication said Council requests that a county allocation of $1,000 be provided the Council for the fiscal year 1973-1974; and In said letter the Council having indicated that it had been the practice of Contra Costa County prior to the fiscal year . 1971-1972 to provide an allocation of funds in aforesaid amount to financially assist the Council in promoting and disseminating information on the economic, environmental, social, governmental and business progress of the Bay Area; and Supervisor Moriarty having recommended that the request of said Council be referred to the Board Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) for con- sideration in connection with its review of the 1973-1974 county budget; NOW,- THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P. -Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the afore-' said recommendation is approved. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: Supervisors J. P . Kenny, J. E. 24oriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: done. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc: Board Committee Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of San Francisco Bay Area Suoervisors Council affixed this 29th day of May , 1973 County Administrator W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Ooro A. Harkness H 24 5/73-15M i g _ . - E •a� EASTSAY CHAPTER NATIONAL SAFIETY COUNCIL 1322 WEBSTER ST/OAKLAM CA G4612/Na4E 93-2413 April 17, 1973 APR 17197- 0% Alfred M. Dias Chairman W. T. P A A S C !a Board of Supervisors CLERK CO I ►SWE6.VISORS Contra Costa County �� -•` �tn�°� Administration Building Martinez, CA 94553 Dear Sir: Attached for consideration by the Board of Supervisors is a proposal for funds made available by the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972. The proposal is in the area of public safety. Major emphasis in the proposal is given to the National Safety Council's Defensive Driving Course. The course could be of particular value to - the County's younger drivers, who have the highest accident rate. (In fact, the greatest cause of death of teenagers:-and young adults in the County is traffic collisions.) We are grateful to the Board members for their perusal of the proposal, and we would appreciate an opportunity to appear before the Board and pursue the matter. Sincerely, ��V 7- Thomas Thomas F. Holler Managing Director TFH: ps Enc. f i SINCE 1922 THE EAST BAY'S NONGOVERNMENTAL, NONPROFIT CITIZEN SAFETY ORGANIZATION --a� m a OTBAY CHAPTER NATIONAL SAFE-*COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUNDS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY March 27, 1973 Names of programs for which funds are requested 1 . Defensive Driving Course. 2. Public Safety Education. Sponsoring organization Eastbay Chapter National Safety Council, 1322 Webster St., Oakland, CA 94612; it is a non - profit corporation, founded in 1923. Program Number One: Defensive Driving Course (a) Overview The Defensive Driving Course is a standardized, eight - hour course, developed by the National Safety Council . The course is being taught in the United States, throughout Canada, and in New Zealand, Belgium, Panama, Germany and many *other countries. It is becoming an international standard of safe driving. The stated purpose of the course is three-fold: 1) Train drivers in professional traffic accident avoidance techniques. 2) Build informed and constructive citizen support for traffic programs. 3) Promote an attitude of mutual understanding, courtesy, and cooper- ation, so that driving a motor vehicle on our streets and highways is a more civilized, safe, pleasant, and successful activity. (b) Priority Status Traffic accidents are a major health problem in Contra Costa County. They are the leading cause of death of young adults. The economic consequences are staggering. At the present time, only a minimal effort is being expended on driver safety programs. The Defensive Driving Course is effective. Studies of whether the course produces a better driver have been conducted by a variety of users and research agencies. (Please note exhibits pertaining to effectiveness.) (c) Pr9gram Description The Eastbay Chapter of the National Safety Council (the only organization in the East Bay authorized to provide the Defensive Driving Course to the public) will establish five "Defensive Driving Course Centers" in various parts of the county, enabling residents to take a course near where they live. Throughout the notion the standard student tuition fee is $10. However, in Contra Costa County, in order to attract a maximum number of drive rs to the Defensive Driving Course, the fee will be reduced to $4 during the first 12 months of DDC operations. This should result in attendance by drivers who cannot afford a $10 fee, includinc many very young drivers, and many very old drivers. �I t ._ v ■ (d) Community Participation A high level of community participation will be sought. Organized groups in Contra Costa County to be contacted include: Youth groups, business-industrial organizations, insurance companies, insurance agents, women's groups, fraternal organizations, parent - teacher organizations, schools, jaycees, chambers of commerce, senior citizen clubs, retirement commun- ities, auto dealers, traffic courts, police departments, churches. (e) County Employee Participation Employees of Contra Costa County will be eligible to attend a Defensive Driving Course, tuition-free. This could result in a substantial reduction in the number of traffic collisions involving county employees both on and off the job. Off'- the - job traffic collisions account for more lost - time than all types of on - the - job accidents. (Potential economic benefits to the taxpayers are high.) (f) Funds Requested Contra Costa County Defensive Driving Course Coordinator: salary and all fringe benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $121000 Instructor materials: kit consists of eight color movies, magnetic blackboard, flannel board, flip chart, and other visuals . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 ,700 Equipment: movie projectors, screens, easels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41000 Misc.: Telephone, printing, postage, insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11500 TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED, PROGRAM NUMBER ONE $19,200 Program Number Two: Public Safety Education (a) Overview The National Safety Council, founded in 1913, has been chartered by the Congress of the United States to serve as the nation's accident prevention leader. The Nat- ional Safety Council is the largest repository of safety information in the world. The expertise and materials of the National Safety Council are available to its accredited "Chapter" in the East Bay, the Eastbay Chapter of the National Safety Council, one of the nation's oldest citizen safety organizations. It depends on the East Bay for every cent of its operating funds; its leaders are men and women who live or work in the East Bay. Section 26153 of the Government Code authorizes a Board to provide for the edu- cation of the public relative to accident prevention and permits the Board to con- tract with an organization such as the Eastbay Chapter to perform that .function. (b) Priority Status Accidents of all types are the leading killer and crippler of Contra Costa County, with the exception of citizens in the very old -age groups. They are the leading cause of death of county residents aged 1 through 35. A continuing public safety . education program, based largely on those types of accidents killing and injuring the most persons, deserves high priority. I P A Californiay of a few years ago indicated tha a cost for county hospital indigent patie. being treated because of accident injury was in excess of one dollar per year per capita. Welfare costs for individuals who were forced on wel- fare because of accidents was in excess of two dollars per year per capita. (c) Program Description 1) Materials Materials (please note samples in exhibit section) will be provided to county residents and to non - profit public service groups in the county at no charge . Such materials also will be supplied to schools and public agencies (police and fire) at no charge. It is anticipated that a total of hundreds of thousands of items will be thus supplied. 2) Movies-:and Slides Movies and slides will be loaned to non - profit, public service organizations (e.g. , parent - teacher groups) at no charge. The Eastbay Chapter maintains one of the largest collections of safety films in Northern California. 3) Programs A variety of National Safety Council programs will be offered to county residents, including programs in the areas of child pedestrian safety, protection of the elderly, women's safety workshops, home safety, recreation safety. (Many of these are available in "package" form -- audio-visuals, instructor guides, student materials-- from the National Safety Council and are then adapted to local needs.) (d) Community Participation Since these activities and materials will be for the benefit of the general public, the several large publics within the general public will be contacted. Another aspect of community participation is that Program Number Two will be conducted primarily by citizen volunteers -- particularly women working under the auspices of the Eastbay Chapter's women's division. (e) County Employee Participation Eastbay Chapter materials (shown in exhibit section) will be provided in any quantity, free, to Contra Costa County officials: police, fire, safety and training officer, healthdepart- ment, schools. y County officials also will be eligible to rent - free use of the Safety Council's films, slides and other audio - visuals. These could become an integral part of the employee safety program . (Standard rental fee of a 16 mm color movie is $14 per week.) (f) Funds Requested Printing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . $41000 Postage costs, including film mailing costs . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . 500. Misc.: insurance, film repair, parcel post, program materials .. . . . . . 1 ,000 TOTAL FUNDS REQUESTED,PROGRAM NUMBER TWO $5,500 Total funds requested for Programs 1 and 2: $24,700.00. A � r..'Haan,nH •......... ._a',. 't''? . y IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Use of ) Revenues from County ) January 23, 1973 Hotel-Motel Tax. ) ) David A. Norwitt, Attorney at Law, representing the Sheraton Inn (Buchanan Field) having appeared before the Board this date to make a presentation on the use of revenues derived from the county hotel-motel tax; and ` Mr. Norwitt having stated that the operation of the Sheraton Inn would produce additional county hotel-motel tax revenues , that revenues from said tax should be used to promote tourism, that consideration should be given to the establishment of a county bureau of tourism, and also that attention should be given to the construction of a county convention center; and Mr. Norwitt having further stated that he wished to formally request that the Board adopt a resolution setting up a tourism bureau to be financed from the proceeds of the county hotel-motel tax; and Supervisor W. N. Boggess having noted that the Contra Costa County Development Association served in the role of a County Chamber of Commerce and accordingly there was not a need to establish a new and separate county tourism bureau; and Supervisor A. M. Dias having stated that he concurred with the opinion expressed by Supervisor Boggess, that perhaps Mr. Norwitt should discuss his proposal with the Development Association, and that the matter might be considered by the appropriate Board Committee as a budget item; and Supervisor E. A. Linscheid having asserted that actions to improve the county economy were desirable, that the segregation of revenues into special funds created problems, that the reserving of hotel-motel tax revenues to promote tourism would stimulate other similar requests such as the allocation of taxes on boats for facilities desired by the boating interests , and that in his opinion the matter of hotel-motel tax revenues should be considered during budget deliberations; and Supervisor Dias having stated that no action should be taken by the Board at this time, that Mr. Norwitt might contact the Development Association, and that any suggestions made by the Association could be referred to a Board Committee; and Supervisor Boggess having advised that the City of Concord had established a convention bureau and was successful in its tourism efforts in the Concord area, that the Sheraton Inn was a major facility in the unincorporated area and would generate revenues from the hotel-motel tax source, that the Board should consider appropriate action in the light of the City of Concord tourism procedure, that in his opinion the matter should be referred to the Administration and Finance Committee (Supervisors Boggess and Linscheid) for attention during the budget review period, and that the matter was not one of immediate urgency ; and I Supervisor Dias having concluded the discussion by indicating that a public hearing was not intended at this time, that the subject should be submitted to the Development Association, and that referral to a Board Committee could be made later for review with the 1973-1974 budget . THIS IS FOR RECORD PURPOSES ONLY, NO ACTION TAKEN. cc : Contra Costa County Development Association County Administrator m _ In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California May 15 19 73 In the Matter of Contra Costa County Human Relations Commission proposed work program and budget request for fiscal year 1973-1974- A letter dated May 4, 1973 having been received from tilr . Alex C. Aguirre, Chairman , Contra Costa County Human Relations Commission, transmitting a copy of its proposed work program and budget request for fiscal year 1973-1974, and advising that said work program and budget request were also presented at the Revenue Sharing Hearing on April 17, 1973 and that at that time it was suggested that the budget also be submitted for consideration in connection with the annual budget determination; and On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor W. N. Boggess, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid letter and related material are REFERRED to the County Administrator for review in connection with the 1973-1974 County Budget. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES : Supervisors J. E . Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES : None . ABSENT: Supervisor J. P. Kenny. 1 hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Co_mmiss i on Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Administrator Supervisors affixed this 15th day of May , 19 73 W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By�,;h�., " Wil.-ccs Deputy Clerk Loure tte Kincaid H 24 5/73-15M i In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California March 20 19 In the Matter of Letter from Council for Civic Unity of Orinda-Lafayette- = T,ioraga urging continuance of Contra. Costa Legal Services Foundation program. This Board on March 14, 1973 having received a letter from Por. Richard W. Baker, Chairman, Council for Civic Unity of Orirda-Lafayette-211oraga, P. 0. Box 281, Orinda, California 94563, urging continuance of the Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation program even if said program has to be funded by Contra Costa County; and On motion of Supervisor E. A. Linscheid, seconded by Supervisor W. N. Boggess, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that said letter is REFERRED to the County Administrator for review in connection with the 1973-1974 budget. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AY''rS: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A . Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES: None. ABSENT: intone. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an circler entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. cc : Council for Civic Unity Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of County Administrator Supervisors affixed this 20th day of 1larch ' 19 7� C , W. T. PAASCH, Clerk gY Deputy Clerk E'lsi e Pik tt H 24 7172-15M COUNCIL FOR CIVIC UNITY OF ' ORlNDA-LAFAYETTF- MORAGA POST OFFICE BOX 281 ORINDA. CALIFORNIA 94863 Murch 12, 1973 DECEIVED► ?.'4R 141973 W. T. PAASCH CLERK BOAIRD OF SUPERVISORS O(M RA COS CO. C+y _ Deputy Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County Martinez, California Gentlemen: We want to urge the Board of Supervisors to make a commitment to continue the Contra Costa Legal Services program in our county, even if it means funding by the County. Contra Costa County has been cited as having one of the best legal services programs in the United States. The curtailment or abolishment of such a necessary legal avenue to redress. grievances for the poor and the minority groups could produce a return to the unrest and rioting which led to its creation in the first place. We would appreciate hearing from-you on this matter as we feel it is of great social importance, as well as economically advan- tageous, to insure the continuing operation of the Legal Services office in this county. Very sincerely yours, Richard W. Baker, Chairman RWB:cl CONTRIBUTIONS ARE TAX DEDUCTIBLE c i • f -' In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California March 20 1973 In the Matter of Approving initiation of a Probation Department Jail Release Program. This Board on March 6, 1973 having referred to its Administration and Finance Committee ( Supervisors W. N. Boggess and E. A. Linscheid) for review and recommendation the matter of initiation of a Probation Department Jail Release Program; and Said comm-ittee having submitted a report to the Board this day recommending that the aforesaid program be authorized and three new positions be created in the Probation Department to operate same, subject to the understanding that during this fiscal year the program will be funded entirely by State probation subsidy funds, and any commitment of county funds is contingent upon evaluation of the program during the 1973-1974 fiscal year budget review; NOW, THEREr`'ORE, on motion of Supervisor Boggess, seconded by Supervisor Linscheid, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the recommendation of its Administration and Finance Committee is APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Diad.. NOES: None. ABSENT: none. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Probation Officer Supervisors Personnel Director affixed this 2nth- day of ma„ Sheriff-Coroner ch---, 19 -73 Auditor-Controller W. T. PAASCH, Clerk Administrator By Deputy Clerk Elsie Pik tt H 24 7/72-15M nd 0 JAMES P. KENNY: RICHMOND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ALFRED M. DIAS IST DISTRICT CHAIRMAN ALFRED M. DIAS. SAN PABLO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY JAMES E. MORIARTY 2ND DISTRICT VICE CHAIRMAN JAMES E. MORIARTY. LAFAYETTE ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGROOM 103 W T. PA A1,CH. -OUNTY CLERK , 3RO DISTRICT AND E% OFFICIO CLERK OF THE BOARD WARREN N. BOGGESS. CONCORD P. O. BOX 911 MRS. GERALDINE RUSSELL 4TH DISTRICT CHIEF CLERK EDMUND A. LINSCHEID, PITTSBURG MARTINEZ. CALIFORNIA 94553 PHONE 228.3000 STH DISTRICT EXTENSION 2371 March 20, 1973 REC,T VEDA IN. T. P A S C H REPORT CL_RK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA CO. ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE COMMI . .................."".._..._.._. Deputy ON MATTER OF A JAIL RELEASE PROGRAM The Board on March 6, 1973 referred the matter of the initiation of a Probation Department Jail Release Program to this committee. - Our committee has met with the County Probation Officer and has given consideration to the various factors involved in the proposed program. The program, which is one of the recommendations concai-iud in the Bay Area Social Planning Council report on the County Jail, will consist of three positions in the Probation Department to interview and investigate offenders who are admitted to the jail, to determine if release to the community is possible pending court action. The State of California has made $30, 240 available to finance the proposed program with no county matchir:g funis required this fiscal year. It is the recommendation of this committee that ::he program be authorized, the three positions be created and that z:'_e success of the program be evaluated during the 1973-197' budget review before any county funds are committed to support the program. �G r E. A. i Supervisor District IV Supervisor Distr_. - V I • �YCEIVED •�"�'��fl�T10 #I I ill m I1 s UP CLER B; SD ar suPERVISA D PA COST CO. By ' ..... D f f ,�s ex ` ! In the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California February 13 19 ,Z.,j In the Matter of Request from Eastbay Chapter National Safety Council for Conduct of a Defensive Driving Course throughout the County of Contra Costa. Supervisor J. E. Moriarty having submitted for Board con- sideration a letter dated February 7, 1973 from Mr. Tom Holler, Managing Director of the Eastbay Chapter National Safety Council, 1322 Webster Street, Oakland, California 94612, indicating that said Council would like to promote a Defensive Driving Course throughout the county, calling attention to Section 26153 of the Government Code under which a Board may contract for services to educate the public relative to accident prevention, and outlining certain services which the Council would perform in return for allocation of county funds in 1973-1974; and On motion of Supervisor Moriarty, seconded by Supervisor J. P. Kenny, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED THAT said letter is REFERRED to the County Administrator for review and report to the Board. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias . NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of cc : Eastbay Chapter National Supervisors Safety Council affixed this 13th day of February , 19 n County Administrator Mrs . Cann W. T. PAASCH, Clerk By Deputy Clerk Elsie Pigb t, H 24 7/72.15M EASTBAY CHAPTER NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 1322WBS7ER5T/QWdAtO,CA 94612/Pti 893.2013 February 7, 1973 r= (; rn Supervisor James E. Moriarty 3445 Golden Gate Way �J,. Lafayette, California 94549 Dear Supervisor Moriarty: SU ERV?SOR i 10 c4'3 I Y Among a number of National Safety Council programs of proven value which we are unable to offer County residents due to budgetary limitations (i.e. , lack of staff) is the eight-hour Defensive Driving Course. (Please note the enclosed description.) Because most of our funds come from our industrial members, we have been forced to concentrate a lion's share of our program effort on assisting them in meeting the employee training demands brought about by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. We especially would like to promote the Defensive Driving Course among drivers younger than 25, who have an extremely high accident rate, and among older (over 60) drivers, a number of whom have expressed interest in the course. Promoting and conducting Defensive Driving Courses throughout the County would be expensive, since each course is taught by a;certified, paid instructor who util- izes an elaborate set of aids, including eight sound-color movies. These expenses account for the standard tuition fee of $10.00 per student. Section 26153 of the Government Code authorizes a Board to provide for the edu- cation of the public relative to accident prevention and permits the Board to con- tract with an organization (such as this 51-year-old Safety Council) to do the job. In return for County funds in 1973-74, the Safety Council will perform the following services (none of which is presently being performed): 1) The Safety Council will expand its staff in order to energetically promote the Defensive Driving Course throughout the County. The tuition fee will be reduced from $10.00 to $4.00. (This would be the lowest fee in the nation, and should attract hundreds of drivers--including many who simply cannot afford a $10.00 fee.) 2) The Safety Council will conduct a variety of other National Safety Council pro- grams found on that organization's list of "Model Programs", such as the four-hour course for senior citizens entitled, "Handle Yourself With Care" (primarily a .home safety course). ET V t V ��i �..3 W. T. F , AS0H CLE SO EDO FSUP ISCRSOS Cy SINCE 1922 THE EAST BAY'S NONGOVERNMENTAL, NONPROFIT CITIZEN SAFETY ORGANIZATION I # Supervisor Moriarty -2- February 7, 1973 3) The Safety Council will make available without charge safety movies, slides, pamphlets and other appropriate materials to County staff, to County schools, to individuals and to nonprofit, public service organizations such as parent- teacher associations, church groups, Scouts, service clubs, and women's groups. 4) The Safety Council will assist County groups in planning and conducting safety projects, such as projects in these problem areas: pedestrian safety, home fire safety, bicycle safety, boating safety, traffic safety. 5) The Safety Council will regularly supply news releases, features, and other informational items to the mass media. 6) The Safety Council will assist the County staff in conducting an effective County employee safety program. County employees will be eligible to attend the Safety Council's occupational safety and health training programs without charge (does not include texts). (Standard tuition fees now range from $10.00 to $200.00 per student.) As to the level of County support in 1973-74, may we respectfully recommend funds in an amount that is approximately equal to the average appropriated last year by other Bay Area counties to their respective chapters of the National Safety Council. (Please note enclosed list.) As you perhaps recall, we depend entirely on East Bay sources for every cent of our operating budget. We receive no funds from the National Safety Council, or from any other "outside" source. We believe that there is a need for organized safety programs in the County, and we would greatly appreciate an opportunity to meet with you at your convenience in order to discuss that need, and to more fully describe various National Safety Council programs. Thank you for your kind consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Tom Holler Managing Director TH:mw Encs. •ir1. .. aL SAFETY COUNCIL COUNTY 1972-73 COUNTY FUNDS Sacramento Safety Council Sacramento $12,500.00 San Francisco Chapter San Francisco $301000.00 National Safety Council San Joaquin County San Joaquin County $13,500.00 Safety Council San Mateo County Son Mateo $14,000.00 Safety Council Santa Clara County Chapter Santa Clara $11 ,000.00 National Safety Council Eastbay Chapter Alameda $1 ,000.00 National Safety Council Eastbay Chapter Contra Costa National Safety Council ■ Y _ Y4' s '', I y.' y 1.4 �µx 7. a =r f n �s 0 1 s° t y �1Y '�r+' °N.�FS ���� - ,:,-: . TAKE A LO NG LOOK YOUR RIVI ISG ' r f f "' r {'- t'L'.­­" _t,,,,:, _'+ _-� .,. "" _'�gg " .__ - 8 - � 11 -, _.�, � ' '--��' ' ,',I. 1 -�.--�,-,,�,,,-�.,.,��,-��".��",7;":;'­ .."", "�'�;'-"�',�' ,.' , � ��"�' -,�� I.. � . I "'.��'­� I . I .I . � . - - -, ­ _ '�`�2­ , _;"��'4t� _ - � � " ,:,.:" !t you took a driver ': 's>hcense test tomorrow, what results would you ,' '11-1— expec4?' - � A ­...��*";f�­ ­7�::�': '�".', �2 ti Dismal failure? RI 1.oori for improvement.-Ape, .score ori both written °� _, _ .�. and practical examinations?Chances are;`most ofuscould be tiette�drivers ��, i c.-x •^ 1. _ + Sri �T than we are. 4f . :.„.. 3 `¢ 11 I. rrT"�to r r[ ( r ��s ! ' t"F""� f `' ,_.a.-¢_ �//)� y 5 y,. 'a r °i 3 {rFr �'�7 XEi�ayr 1..+�'., r"��4^ yy „ r•�e ^rr s - t ',,�.tC k�'. .,. ” •-% LA �i SL *} x 'F4 'f3 _L ''41 h�IF pl l4 23 }a?. ... BUT1WH BOTfiER y � Y .�� �� ���� :,�f.'." � k 1 V,3.W . ,� w x tr .,a r.ti irK [+, a3iL*d8d,` � � � •' '> `Y ... 's a } �.:uc .�-.fit t i.� p �n 3 'rid -�.d..».,.�m..°e. _ _ _� f ` .� > > a s w.r; ,.'' p.. .Fo..,1. Yom'.-.a�, : _ r �y + ' ,f } Key .___ . Here s why The odds are that 1 out of every 2 peopte liy�ng today vn;h �n - .���..____ tie ..�. + z s a �,, a"r Jt t 5��.,.', ' sN.`r'``..a' �' r 'r?',..k»,ra:. "'�"° }.a'Y . 'r involved in a crippling or fatal#raffle accident The stakes are high Inlnry,$ i': r iz te , disability,or death r.To change theodds,you m�gbt stayoffthe roads, r k'i� A M �P , P� Fj 1. . ,-sc'? a �?`.z � ry a ye s drive only near.hospit1. Ials,wear steel platearmor,or switch to a"bicycrea =rr f �� <z;= 0- iat ���� !��� a Y IN THE _1111 Y .IVa; OR YOU. CAN ENROLL ^y y r r�F, yr �, - - e ,_'v ;r x r 1t -� •..0 n,s. t. Lx r i s �''-,.�`' f' +` �" 'yt E s5 .:, _­'� -, _111�­'_­_ . �N., I.. A,. �I :: IIITIO4�"' I'llNAL SAFETY COU1-�--,-r,,-,'�,,��-,� ���1-1. �",� ,�­'� :"NC��__ I ——IL'S ry4. xis` ., 4- ' 4' 1 1 .- . :DEFENSIVE g? -DR �� IVING CO:URE..",: -' fi , "'. � , - vat " ' r ^. r�r.,'fvl;' i`_..: Defensive dnv ng gives drivers a better chance to avoid tt'a c mishaps. ,_ '� L t IIt is based on'the concept hat mostaccidentsare piei entablethnougF ,� r _ y ,, O fle d OUt When aid W." �e,� t � . _:;,K ..a 3 ;r- y a combination,of driver alertness,,.skill,and knowlediK6bWwhat#a do under e��17@ e D n9` ��, w � th xt Deferasty nvi W�� adverse condi#ons and emergencysituations CrQU�Se�Wlll b@£COndUCted In Y J�4 x� w M j rtr isra ea, call or Witte ' t a .1�11.1Ili rlM- t a ;tib { :y{ '?' r 3C - -+ 5 .;+"1 . 1. y z � ; -NSIVE�DRI-. IS �'E�ICH 3LE .. 3 T y !�► z". rte, [ f . ^" '° ! r ' ,t «, , yN 1* �a'� 4' 4j - And it is being taug t' h jn your area now during D`efenstve Driving Week1�1 ti �, 4 �r t fee The Defensive D"' i Course consists of a'i66ltof a r r { for a minimum ', - , . g, ;- ,� . �b n CWH 8 hours�of concentrated study,aecture, discussion, and demonst�r,a on � t 5 , R i ry1. provang his OaIk1a1W, Ct 9�I612 . ;_ It.offers:eve icensed motorist a.standardized method�for im„ °: 42, dr:vmg.ability through the practice of professional safe"dnvrng techniques F �� ` S ' r 11, • z z� 1. A RAPIDREiIIEfk OF MAJOR SthB�ET COVERED�1�1 DSC `}�� ' '�� `�� � � -��a�p tSiC, w rxa .4s F. r13,. *>.. '�e�s f )r 4 xa Y , e F ,u.".+ ' - �r REVEALS THE ©EPTH OF; H� DEME iliE=:DRQ USZONCER ,; v.�s �ti "ti ?, �t. 7 _ .. ,. Ui-,yi „. t .i�`'�`3-{nx 5 r'.y i rr ,i r Y K a� d J9 a x a -'. i 11 !s there such a thing as perfect driving?. _ r F { d _ ... '�' r� j`.'�1. ■•How car the"Two-Second�Rltle”keepyou out of a'i_"_ ion w, t,i;the � ° x ' 7 -_,`t ' .y��x _ � �. t E �} ��xj;, vetiicle ahead? rn Cast X10 00 rz st dent (n How can you shake`a tailgater� Pe n_, a .11-1­111— �> . d t r1 �� {' ■ How can you best compensate for centrifugal force o.-a curves n 1. eludes tuition a ude ., ; 1. orkloo r }y , O Which direction should you look,first when approaching an intersection? �' x t� k). _ I. _W ;t.- ■ Is it legal to exceed the speed limit in passing? Those,who Complete the &<' ` �' I , ,. ■ Haw.can you protect yourself from headlight glares hOu� 'COtJrse will rece'111-1ive a ; t �"- z raduatton certificate' -tr e H11 Iow much can you drink and sfill"drive safely. 9 (S'I .' � - �� .. ;, � 1. able fior .wall display) andw , `.1 "'��� I. a wallet cardtT' f ' DOES DDC REALLY 1NORK? — { }`:ir 5 4� PLEASE TURN THE PAGE6 y ,- �� � 1. eI N *+ ^,,^"F Lm ° 3 .'{P"° :I�.t y.. s'I rYK V 4 F �,�,vi h -' S j. {� f [ A 1. ,. S t $ c c' k wf s c1k + 9,.. _ - x.... r .� �.. Fes' Gx e33;�' ,� 't,""` s 4e-'', saga :. r =�r Vis?:: M F t�U 9L w a ;`• _ ,'. „d .. _.p Y... ..Cv ,z.. cr. r, N, • After studying the records of Defensive,Drlving Course graduates ,n Missouri,Illinois and _ Georgia, Hartford Insurance Group offers a �o portent reduction to:drivers whoccm Veto DDC. _ • An in�depth National Safety-Council research project completed In late:1972-show od.that, t' licensed drivers 'wrho completed :'the eight-hour WehsIve Driving;Counter had:sub- stantially fewer accidents and viofatfons than other drivers:Thee>e;vVere,the basic;}ind- l Ings of a study involving more than 8,000 DDC flraduafieie►,.Ix►.26 states • Does DDC Help tnafflc_violators? Typical_of judgea%respoataes: "ln niy court, l=expect.to .,see about 50percent of traffic-,violators'back In:courtgn another Traffic cnarge within a year's'tlme Since we've-had OQC:fOr violators,.'tha,►0tum ►aia for violators Is seven to eight percent"`(Judge Jamas D..Urso,=DenverCounty'Court). • The Texas State Board of Insurance has announced that Texans can receive a 10 percent reduction on their-automobile Insurance premiums,If,they successfully,complete the Defensive Driving curse. This reduction could. tspresent an annuO savings,_of million to Texas insurance buyers, • The City of New York has undertaken the massive talrxi g taskof ►rfalgln0` G toali of� -its municipal employes. Says-the qty's safety. doordinatorf'C. J Setter: ' e believe.,- this training will have an important lmpaarct on hiptway ilitfaty, not only-for the cIty`aery ; ice, but for the community at large. • "This course merited excellent reception by drivers In all echelons and:was exceptionally well-attended, a good-criterionIn training.`As an`example of results,°our.Public Works Dept:; which operates some 800 Yehiclea'more titan 6,000,000 milss:pef year, has re= duced -its accident frequency by half in the past-five ears:" {Dairid E y . ,Koch, Safety Director, City of San Antonio, Texas.). • New Mexico Governor Bruce King has publicly endorsed'ODC and has Issued a directive;' to all,department heads of state agencies; reque:ting that the coo be'presented to all state employees. o The Defensive Driving Course has bean selected`by the',Boy Scouts of America as, a national,traffic safety program to bringtheprinciples of defensive driving:to-employees'I volunteers and Explorer Scouts within the B3A organization. • The insurance carrier of the Nationa_i AssocI&1 tan of:Retirod,Persons(membership in the millions),has granted a 10 percent premlumdfscount to any pont, oider who success- fully completes'DDC. • In five years of participation In the Def•naive DHing Course;°neariy:'l,000;000,-ririvers.:` have graduated under the auspices of thO,United StatesGontinental army Command. • Defensive drivings{s 44a becoming'an:ink nstionai standarcIvU fe,driving ;The-Defan sive Driving Course ii" being taught;in:the-Unitad Staaiba=. throughout Canada, Now,:- Zealand. Belgium and Panama, and In various European countries,",:- f7_ ountries:. F z Rf� , January 23, 1973 10 : 110 a.m. no board order DAVID NORWITT, Attorney for Sheraton Inn, I want to talk about room tax. Going to be source of revenue for the county in amount we can't tell. Thinks it is critical to use money to promote business in county and increase revenue. You cannot expect any hotel operator, to carry on--advertising to benefit the county as a whole . Basically, what our proposal . is is that there be established some type of agency by the county to make use of room tax for benefit of county as whole for promotion of tourism. For example, county bureau :'or other type organization can be established to promote tourism within the county . Benefit certain portion of the county, such as the airport. We would like to see: tourism bureau be established-- utilized tax for benefit of tourism for county as whole -- build convention center, benefit everybody in county-- Would like to formally propose Board of Supervisors consider the adoption of resolution to establish tourism bureau within this county to make use of these funds . BOGGESS : County Development Association - Chamber of Commerce for Coun, Consider channeling these funds into development association. No need to form a new tourism department when we have County Chamber of Commerce. NORWITT: It is desirable to channel these funds through department . This Board consider using; the tax levy on motels/hotels for a specific purpose . Is that right? NORWITT : Specific purpose is the promotion of tourism throughout the ,county . DIAS : I think Boggess1comment was appropriate. Perhaps then you should be talking to the Development Association. A committee of the Board can be considered as budget items . LINSCHEID: Anything that helps economy is fine, but don't get into position of separate revenue and designating it for specific purposes . Let me cite , for example , personal property tax on boats . If you make a point for expanding tourism on basis of taxes and making apoint for expansion of boating interest based on amount of revenue now received for boats . This is desirable as many programs are. It would- be a proper decision at budget time to evaluate all problems and consider it at budget time. DIAS. I think this Board will do nothing at this time. If Mr. Norwitt r BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ;7 n` COT?TRA COSTA COUNTY DATE: _ 7 nnnrx °:-3.57.R TO: Mr. Robert E. Nickels General Manager Sheraton Inn P. 0. fox 5636 Concord California 94524 FROM: W. T. MASCH, Clerk of Board SUBJECT: Request for Pyr. David Norwitt to appear before the Board regarding; the room tax rate for motels . Your matter has been listed on the Board calendar for !19;; and will ge taken up at approximately Di-puty-Clerk cc: County Counsel Administrator Department 71-1-500 Form 26;2 s t" _. . Reply to; 45 John Glenn Dr. P. O. Box 5636 Concord, CA 94520 Concord, 825-7700 California 94524 OPEN,IAN. 1973 (415) 825 7700 January 2, 1973 Board of Supervisors RECEIVED Clerk of the Board P. 0. Box 911 1973 Martinez, California 94553 W. T. P A A S C H CLERK BOAf.AC T D Or SUCOSUPERVISORS f . Attn: Mrs. Kemp BY N Deputy Dear Mrs. Kemp; We are requesting that we be removed from the agenda of January 9th and rescheduled for the meeting of January 23, 1973. 44- 10.'`40 Thank you. Si erely, ert E. Nickels General Manager ya Sheraton-Inn Reply to: 45 John Glenn Dr. -vxgctwx kjak bc.orit. Concord, CA 94520 PC_Vx�;�5kx, x x x x 825-7700 OPEN JAN. 1973 2 �X P . O . Box 5636 C oncord, Ca. 94524 December 19, 1972 Contra Costa County Board Of Supervisors RECEIVED Clerk of the Board RE Y P. O. Sox 911 DEC ?,-1972 Martinez, Ca. 94553 t W. T. PAASCM +CLERK SOAR OF SUPERVISORS Attn: Mrs. Kemp NT COST By puty Dear Mrs. Kemp, — Per our telephone conversation today, please reserve time on the agenda January 9,1973, for our representative, David Norwitt to appear before the board regarding the room tax rate for motels. Thank you;; Kay Esola Director of Sales J• �',1, •� �, IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Referrals ) of Board 1972 County Government January 16, 1973 Operations Committee. The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its 1972 County Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to aforesaid referrals: Referral Date Item Recommendation 1-4-r72 Correspondence frc=:C•: Board of Supervisors on judges of Walnut Creek- December 19, 1972 approved plan Danville Municipal Court to lease new court facilities pertaining to future designed to county specifi- court facilities. cations. Remove as committee referral. 5--30-72 Recommendations of Direct County Administrator 10-•17-72 Citizens Council on to inform parties of the funds 11--27--72 Motorcycles with respect being accumulated from the to off--highway vehicle off-highw&7 vehicle tax. recreation areas; request from Mrs. Marjorie Gills with respect to riding areas and trails for off-highway motor vehicles; and letter from Jim Chakedis urging use of off-road vehicle fees an a means of providing motorcycle riding areas within county. 8-15-72 Mt. View Sanitary Board Solid Waste Disposal of Directors resolution Committee has been established; pertaining to operation refer Mt. View Sanitary District and maintenance of solid resolution to that committee. waste dump sites. Remove as Board committee referral. 11-14472 Proposal of Mrs. Cecelia Refer to County Agriculture Sharkey that funds be Coimaiss oner and Count allocated for employment A m nistrator for review and of veterinarians at donsideratlon-ifi—dom-pilation Animal Control Centers. o u g o -1971x. fiscal Year.—. Various Letters submitted to Planning Department has been Board and referred to requested to review each case County Government and furnish a recannendation; Operations Committee Committee will report after protesting payment of receipt of staff recommendation . park dedication fees. � r The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recommendations to be appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Dias, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that aforesaid recom- mendations of its 1972 County Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote of the Board: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, J. E. Moriarty, W. N. Boggess, E. A. Linscheid, A. M. Dias. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervioore affixed this 16th day of January, 1973• 3 B A L ) W. T. PAASCH, CLERK B • Deputy Sandra Stimler cc: Administrator Public Works Director Sheriff-Coroner Planning Director Fast Bay Regional Park District Contra Costa Mayors Conference Mt. View Sanitary District Solid Waste Disposal Committee Health Officer County Counsel Agricultural Commissioner Mrs . C. Sharkey Auditor-Controller Members, Board of Supervisors a r IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of Referrals ) to County Government Operations ) November 21, 1972 Committee of the Board. } ) The Board heretofore having made certain referrals to its County Government Operations Committee (Supervisors A. M. Dias and J. E. Moriarty) ; and Said committee having reported and recommended as follows with respect to aforesaid referralst Referral Date Item Recommendation 10-17-72 Letter from Mrs. A. Letter illustrates difficulties Jovanovich pertaining to which may result when temporary civil service practices personnel are hired for Con- on hiring of personnel. tinuing duties and responsi- bilities; employee has now obtained permanent civil service status. Remove as committee referral. 9-5--72 Applications for home- Approve partial exemption for owners partial property W. G. Ball (Parcel #169-291-001) tax exemption received and D. Campbell (Parcel #230- after time deadline. 080-002) which applications show deadline for filing was missed for reasonable cause. Dis- approve iss a prove L. Page (Parcel #133- 1t52- 001), G. R. Edwards (Parcel #540-050-025) and C. M. Steines (Parcel #572-121-003) for failure to make aforesaid showing. 8-28-72 Communication from County Adopt c - maittee recommendation Land Conservation Committee that only commercial agricul- with respect to certain tural production and those recreational uses in compatible uses set forth in agricultural preserves. county ordinance heretofore adopted are to be allowed within agricultural preserves. 1-4x,72 Letter and memorandum Refer to Public Defender, 5-30•-72 from W. R. Higham, Public County Counsel, and County Defender, relating to Administrator to develop plans legislation which provides and procedures for implementing for hiring of contract legislation for consideration attorneys in "conflict of by the Board. interest" cases. 5-16-72 Report of Sheriff-Coroner Report submitted for infor- on death of inmate) at mation of the Board. Retain County Jail. copy on file in Office of County Clap k. 4 =11--72 Memorandum from County Direct staff to continue to Counsel pertaining; to review problem and feasibility discharge of firef_rms in and cost of implementing San Ramon area. additional control measures. I� i Referral Date Item Recommendation 2-28--72 Review of use of temporary Matter reviewed during com- per sonnel by Animal Control pilation of 1972-1973 county Division of County budget. Remove as committee Department of Agriculture. referral. 2-28-72 Report from Judicial Council Direct staff to continue ro- of California containing view of report and legislative excerpt from "Final Reports measures based thereon and of the Unified Trial Court advise Board of Supervisors if Feasibility Study and the and when it should take a California Lower Court position on said measures. Study." 2-8-72 Letter from Presiding Letter submitted to inform Judge Norman Gregg advising Board of policy position of opposition of Superior Superior Court Judges . Retain Court Judges to participation letter on file for reference. of County Probation Depart- ment in Inter-Agency Neighborhood Center concept. 1-31-72 Investigation as to feasi- Request Public Works Director bility of bringing up to to submit preliminary report �64 ��/�� standard the improvements on feasibility and cost to on county property at County Administrator for review Buchanan Field now leased in connection with Compilation to Burgess Truck Rentals, of budget for 1973-1974 fiscal Inc. for sales office. year. 1-31-72 Proposed ordinance to Refer to Sheriff and District regulate outdoor festivals Attorney for final review and and carnivals . comment with respect to enact- ment at this time. 1-3172 Request of Mr. H. L. Request County Administrator Clarke for appointment of and County Counsel to submit new county hearing recommendations on plan and officers? to replace procedures to be utilized to Mr. Levy. conduct Hearing Officer function inasmuch as Mr. Levy has resigned. 1-31-72 Report of Law Enforcement Request staff and personnel of Committee of 1971 County city police agencies to continue Grand Jury. evaluation of recommendations and to consider in light of forthcoming recommendations of 1972 Grand Jury as well as budget considerations; and The Board having considered said committee report and determined the recommendations to be appropriate; NOW, THEREFORE, on motion of Supervisor Dias, seconded by Supervisor Moriarty, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid recommendations of its County Government Operations Committee are APPROVED. The foregoing order was passed by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors J. P. Kenny, A. M. Dias, J. E . Moriarty, W. N. Boggess , E. A. Linscheid. NOES: None . ABSENT: None . t 1ki A Z HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of an order entered on the minutes of said Board of Supervisors on the date aforesaid. Witness my hand and the Seal of the Board of Supervisors affixed this 21st day of November, 1972. (S E A L) W. T. PAASCH, CLERK J. By p �� L7n ura a Kincaid Deputy Clerk cc: County Administrator (14) Personnel Director Welfare Director (2) Assessor (b) Auditor-Controller County Land Conservation Committee Agricultural Commissioner Planning Director County Counsel Public Defender District Attorney County Counsel Sheriff-Coroner Medical Director Supervisor Linscheid Judicial Council of California Presiding Judge Norman Gregg Probation Officer Public Works Director (2) Centrax Labor Council of Contra Costa County Mr. H.. L. Clarke Superior Court Secretary (2)